Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PSOMAS Master Drainage Plan
oN P U)i (a BE iiiiniuuwi � r i •L 1 L j r' 1 n w Prepared by P5O April 2004 '. `.•�t.�.,�- � ,��, 'ALA -- ��" . - •�i. 41 Psomas Transmittal Form https:Hintra.psomas.corii/project/transmittaVtransprint.cfm?tb—id=729e PS 0 M AS, 3187 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 250 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Voice: 714-751-7373 Fax: 714-545-8883 Date: 04/09/04:; Job No. I Project: La Quinta Master Drainage Plan To: Steven' Speer, ,'Assistant City Engineer Public Works Department (760) 777-7078 City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA CA92253 0 Per Your Request 0 Mail 0 Approval nAcknowledge P-1 Enclosed �i s P/I Ov6might nReview and Comment Return Enclosures UPS Under separate cover nbPS n Distribution Respond By: essen er.., -yririts, 9 Information/Files, J Ttansparencies lar-.i&,,', 1 .-Signature. 0 Specifications nFed Ex.' 0 CD/Disketteg: J Fax 0 FFP• /.E-Mail Enclomires: (If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us immediately.) 1 Project Binder for the Preparation of a Master Drainage Plan for the City of La Quinta 4/9/04 Issued B , y: Bill Whittenberg T Copies o: File,� 4/9/2004 3:36 PM v� r� L_J City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan Project Contact List 1 LAQ010100 City of La Quinta City Contacts Nick Nickerson 78 -495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777 -7088 NAI Tel: (760) 323 -5344 Cell: (760) 861 -6401 Fax: (760) 323 -5699 Email: nnickerson(o)naiconsulting.com Steve Speer 78 -495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777 -7043 Public Works: (760) 777 -7075 Fax: (760) 777 -7155 Email: sspeer _la-guinta.org Psomas Project Manager William Whittenberg 3187 Red Hill Ave. Ste. 250 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tel: (714) 481 -7908 Cell: (714) 321 -7796 Fax: (714) 545 -8883 Email: wwhittenberg(Dpsomas.com Project Engineer Ken Susilo 11444 West Olympic Blvd. Ste. 750 West Los Angeles, CA 90064 Tel: (310) 954 -3822 Cell: (310) 710 -4433 Fax: (310) 954 -3777 Email: ksusilo psomas.com Alex Menez 3187 Red Hill Ave. Ste. 250 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tel: (714) 481 -7906 Cell: (714) 396 -9010 Fax: (714) 545 -8883 Email: amenez(a�psomas.com Project Principal Blake Murillo 11444 West Olympic Blvd. Ste. 750 West Los Angeles, CA 90064 Tel: (310) 954 -3708 Cell: (310) 429 -6444 Fax: (310) 954 -3777 Email: bmurilloapsomas.com GIS /Aerial Survey Daniel McCroskey 3187 Red Hill Ave., Ste. 250 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tel: (714) 481 -7907 Cell: (714) 336 -6560 Fax: (714) 545 -8883 Email: dmccroskeyO- Dsomas.com M:\1 LAQ010100\Admin \contact list \Contact List - rev.doc 1 of 2 ►'1 City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan Project Contact List 1 LAQ010100 • Exponent Senior Engineer Doug Hamilton 320 Goddard Way, Ste. 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Tel: (949) 341 -6000 Cell: (949) 300 -5820 Fax: (949) 341 -6059 Email: dhamilton(Dexponent.com GeoPentech Project Manager Eric Fordham 601 N. Parkcenter Dr., Ste. 110 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Tel: (714) 796 -9100 ext. 17 Cell: (714) 376 -6610 Fax: (714) 796 -9191 Email: eric ford ham(aDgeopentech.com Principal S. Thomas Freeman 601 N. Parkcenter Dr., Ste. 110 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Tel: (714) 796 -9100 ext. 15 Cell: (714) 325 -2994 Fax: (714) 796 -9191 Email: tom freeman(a geopentech.com • Sladden Engineering Principal Brett Anderson 39725 Gerand Lane Palm Desert, CA 92211 Tel: (760) 772 -3893 Cell: (760) 250 -1670 Fax: (760) 772 -3895 Email: sladdenpalmdesert cDearthlink.net M:\1 LAQ010100\Admin \contact list \Contact List - rev.doc 2 of 2 June 26, 2003 1 r � P.O. Box 1504 78 -495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 PSOMAS Attn: Ken Susilo, P.E. 11444 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 750 West Los Angeles, CA 90064 RE: City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan Dear Ken: (760) 777 -7000 (TDD) (760) 777 -1227 Enclosed for your records is a copy of the revised Professional Services Agreement for the City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan. Paragraph 5.2 "Indemnification" has-been revised to include the standard City indemnification language. Please contact me immediately if there is a problem with the revised wording, otherwise I will assume PSOMAS agrees to the new wording. No other • changes were made to the document previously signed by PSOMAS. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (760) 777 -7042. Sincerely, a imothy R. onass , P.E. Public Works Director /City Engineer Encl. TRJ /acj T:\PW7DEPMTAFFVONASSON\LETTERS2003\030626B.DOC N1� g■ • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement ") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, ( "City "), a California municipal corporation, and Psomas ( "Consultant "). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services related to the City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "services" or "work "). Consultant warrants that all services will be performed -in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the City of La Quinta and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance • of the services required by this Agreement. 1.4 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing; (c) it has carefully considered how the Work should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should Consultant' discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by City, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 1.5 Care . of Work. Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work performed by Consultant, and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance. of services by Consultant shall not relieve Consultant from any obligation to. correct any incomplete, inaccurate or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Consultant. 1.6 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Consultant shall not be required to perform • any additional services without compensation. Any addition in compensation not exceeding five percent (5 %) of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increase must be approved by the City Council. \ \CLQADMFSI \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2603 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 1 of 13 1.7 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, • which are made a part hereof are set forth in Exhibit "D" (the "Special Requirements "). In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with Exhibit "B" (the "Schedule of Compensation ") in a total amount not to exceed One hundred twenty thousand, two hundred dollars ($120,200.00) (the "Contract Sum "), except as provided in Section 1.6. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, payment for time and materials based upon Consultant's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.2 Method of Payment. Any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, Consultant shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the services provided, including time and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal • member of Consultant specifying that the payment requested is for work performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. City will pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than the last working day of the month. 3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in Exhibit "C ". (the "Schedule of Performance "). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be.extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the forced delay when and if in his or her judgement such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination shall. be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. • 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Sections 7.7 or 7.8 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance. \ \CLQADMFSI \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 2 of 13 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK • 4.1 Representative of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant are hereby. designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf With respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: a. Ken Susilo, P.E., Vice President It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The foregoing principals may not be changed by Consultant and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 . Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Steven D. Speer, Assistant City Engineer or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of City. It shall be Consultant's responsibility. to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval 'of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. • 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience; knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by..operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. C] 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times'as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees.of City. 4.5 City Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Consultant only from or through action by City. \ \CLQADMFS1 \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 3 of 13 • 5.0 INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS. 5.1 Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, personal and public liability and property.damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Consultant's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement: The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in accordance with the following table: Contract Sum Personal Injury /Property Damage Coverage Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence $50,000'- $300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence Over $300,000 $500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence Consultant shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Consultant, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Consultant, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or • indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. ThP term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi- trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither. City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. n Consultant shall carry-Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's Compensation laws. Consultant shall - procure professional errors and omissions liability insurance in an amount acceptable to City. All insurance required by this Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days written notice to City of proposed cancellation. The. procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. \ \CLQADMFSI \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 4 of 13 5.2 Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, • its officers, officials, employees,, representatives and agents, " City indemnitees," from and against any and all actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property (including property owned by the City) ( "claims ") and for errors and omissions committed by Consultant, its officers, anyone directly or indirectly employed by Consultant, any subcontractor, and agents or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by City's own negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct, or that of its officers or employees. In the event the City indemnitees are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding in any way involving such claims, Consultant shall provide a defense to the City indemnitees, or at the City's option, reimburse the City indemnitees their costs of defense, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in defense of such claim. In addition, Consultant shall be obligated to promptly pay any final judgement or portion thereof rendered against the City indemnitees. 5.3 , Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. • b. Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement and /or withhold any payment(s) which become. due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City. may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Consultant's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein :contained shall -be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS. 6.1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 6.2 Records. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the. performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records. \ \CLQADMFSI \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts\PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 5 of 13 6.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon termination of this Agreement ci- upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of it full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant shall cause all subcontractors to assign to City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages suffered thereby. . In the event City or any person, firm or corporation authorized by City reuses said documents and materials without written verification or adaptation by Consultant for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said documents and materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Consultant from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the completion of this Contract and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 6.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. Consultant shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City. 7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. • 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 0 7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty -five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with' the provisions of this section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8. 7.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Consultant sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Consultant in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. \ \CLQADMFSI \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 6 of 13 7.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non • defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Consultant requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Consultant. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 7.8 for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. 7.8 Termination For Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City as previously stated in Section 7.3. 7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement,' the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION. 8.1 Non- liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms -of this Agreement. \ \CLOADMFSI \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 7 of 13 8.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect,' in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which she or he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or general consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex; marital status, national origin or ancestry. 9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first -class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty -eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. To City: CITY OF LA QUINTA Attention: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager 78 -495 Calle Tampico P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 To Consultant: PSOMAS Attention: Ken Susilo, P.E. Vice President 11444 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 750 West Los Angeles, CA 90064 9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understanding, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. 9.3. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties. 9.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by. a valid judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs; or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 9.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that • by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. \ \CLQADMFS1 \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 8 of 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below.. CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date ATTEST: June Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney CONSULTANT - PSOMAS Name: Ken J. Susilo, P.E. Title: Vice President Date: (III o� • Exhibit A Scope of Service's The scope of services to be provided by PSOMAS, dated June 12, 2003, is attached and made a part of this agreement. \ \CLQADMFSI \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 10 of 13 • • Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation Payment shall be in full at the rates listed in the Schedule of Billing Rates attached herewith for the actual hours submitted in conformance with Section 2.2 of the Agreement. Total compensation for all work under this contract shall not exceed One hundred Twenty thousand two hundred dollars ($120,200.00) except as specified in Section 1.6 - Additional Services of the Agreement. \ \CLQADMFS1 \PJBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 11 of 13 • Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Consultant, shall complete all services within 12 months of the date of this Agreement. The project schedule is attached and made a part of this Agreement. \ \CLQADMFS1 \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 12 of 13 • 0 • Exhibit D Special Requirements None. \ \CLQADMFSI \PUBWRKS \PWDEPT \PROJECTS \2003 Prjcts \PSOMAS PSA.doc Page 13 of 13 10 City of La Quinta .• • Master Drainage Plan Scope of Services The following describes our proposed scope of services, developed to respond to requirements set forth in the City's RFP. Task 1 =- Aerial Topographic, Facilities, and Hydrologic Map (400 -foot) The basic flow of information is described below. This task focuses on mapping - related activities. Initial data would consist of aerial photography {consisting of 1 'meter pixels and a Digital Elevation Model (DEM)- derived 4 -foot contour topography). It is assumed that a storm drain Atlas or, at a minimum, index sheets are electronically available and that these would.be used to identify subject storm drains. The atlas/index sheet information would be reviewed and storm drains identified by technical staff, with attributes consisting of conduit/conveyance size. Field staff would. then use the compiled (aerial, topography, edited atlas) information for use in field verification of facilities.. (See Task 3 below.) All City - identified detention basins would also be included in these base maps. •F - Catch basin identification • Record data on hard copy • Hydrology • Hydraulics Once evaluations and recommendations are developed (Tasks 3 -6), maps will be finalized and additionaf information appended. This information will include drainage areas and design flow rates. Deliverable: The deliverable for this task will be digitally available 400 -scale aerial photos with topography, existing and proposed facilities, and hydrologic data. Master Drainage Plan 1 P S O M A S Scope of Services June 12, 2003 Task 2 — Research .2.1 Review criteria Criteria for open channels, storm drains, street flow, retention basins, and house pads will be reviewed. It is anticipated that the criteria and methods established in the original Master Drainage Plan represent the status quo for City planning and design. Future criteria will be discussed with the City and risk -based evaluation scenarios will be presented for considerabion .Ultimately, this will be a policy decision made by the City. 2.2 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Criteria Psomas will review the current hydrology and hydraulic criteria for evaluation (previous study assumed Manning's equation). While Riverside County does not employ the concepts of high confidence versus expected values used in San Bernardino and Orange Counties, these will also be considered. 2:3 Review Soils Data, Precipitation Available soils and precipitation data are limited, as reflected in the previous Master Drainage Plan. Our project team has conducted numerous percolation tests within the City and has data that may update assumptions with respect to soils and loss rates. While the Riverside County Hydrology Manual has some soils data within the County, these data do not apply to La Quinta. Psomas may. utilize NRCS soils data (SSURGO and STATSGO), select field observations, results from infiltration studies, and previous planning documents to • estimate soil types to be incorporated into a rainfall runoff model. is 2-A Provide CVWD Assumptions for Evacuation Channel and. Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel The CVWD design criterion for the Whitewater Stormwater Channel is the Standard Project Flood. As part of this task, Psomas will investigate hydraulic conditions of Coachella Valley Water District facilities for the purposes of future design, and will incorporate this information into the final plan. 2.5 Water Quality It may be beneficial to integrate concepts of water quality and water reuse into the research element. It will facilitate compliance of new development though one set of design guidelines. It will also potentially reduce project- induced impacts of development. Psomas will review current Storm Water ( NPDES MS4) Permit requirements in conjunction with current City programs and will integrate New Development storm water design elements into the Master Drainage Plan. These elements will provide a cohesive data source for both the.City and developers to facilitate compliance with both drainage and water quality compliance. Psomas will also address NPDES MS4 Construction program elements and will reference other program components in the Plan Assumption: It is assumed that this effort will not entail development of new program elements, but will leverage the current Riverside County MS4 program. Deliverable Task 2: Summary of Information for Master Drainage Plan Master Drainage Plan 2 P S O M A S Scope of Services . June 12, 2003 I� Task 3 — Evaluation 3.1 Analyze Public Facilities The purpose of this task is to review and analyze facilities under the responsibility of the City. In conjunction with Task 1, above, Psomas will review plans and data collected above. In addition, as part of the field verification process, we will verify (through surface visible inspections) inlets in the field, focusing on the arterial streets and public streets in residential areas. For purposes of cost estimation, up to 80 miles of street inventoried for drainage facilities will be initially driven for location and updating. 9 If additional field investigation or condition assessments are required, they will be separately authorized and are excluded from this effort. It is assumed that up to 50 additional locations of . street would be included for this effort. Baseline hydrologic assessments will consist of a review of the assumptions made in previous studies and an update of the analyses based on this framework. For this effort, it is assumed that new hydrologic models will not be required, but that existing models (or data developed therein) can be adopted using current criteria and watershed conditions. It is also anticipated that focused analyses Will be limited to the Cove area (though City-wide analyses are possible as an additional service); since privately developed areas would have more recent studies that have been. approved by the City and meet current drainage requirements. It is assumed that hydraulic calculations and analyses will not include detailed backwater /pipe network modeling, and that the analyses would be limited to the Cove in conjunction with potential FEMA evaluations. 3.2 FEMA (Zone A) As previously stated, .many areas within the City are within FEMA Flood Zones the most critical is near the northeast edge of the Cove. Property owners in these areas are required to purchase flood insurance at significant cost. Through the City, Psomas will request a copy of the Flood Insurance Study backup data from the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), and upon receipt, will review and evaluate these data. This review will seek to identify whether significant changes to the floodplain have been made that are not reflected on the FIRM. Psomas will review the 100 -year peak flows for the effective flood insurance study; and compare these flows to regional peak flow regression equations and analyses conducted in Task 3.1. On this basis a draft revised FIRM will be prepared along with necessary forms for submission to FEMA. With the City, Psomas will request a revision to the effective map. This task excludes responses to FEMA and subsequent processing activities. Additional processing if required may be approved by the City under separate contract amendment. 3.3 Percolation Testing The objectives of this task are 1) to assess the validity of previous tests and applications for percolation, 2) to assess the impacts of age and long -term siltation, and 3) to examine saturated soils. The geotechnical program will consist'of work plan development -and testing consistent with the attached cost proposal by subconsultant GeoPentech. Master Drainage Plan 3 P S O M A S Scope of Services June 12, 2003 • 0 • Deliverables: Analysis of public facilities, identification of FEMA issues, percolation test results and summary report. Task 4 — Conclusions Based on the results from task items 1 -3 above, Psomas will summarize the existing system component and will present them in a graphically attractive map, available digitally for use in future planning studies. Conclusions will include drainage deficiencies, FEMA Zone A areas, and an evaluation of the existing drainage criteria. Deliverable: Conclusions Section of Master Drainage Plan Task 5 — Study Alternatives The purpose of this task is to identify alternatives that reduce or eliminate the City's drainage deficiencies and FEMA.Zone A areas. Upon completio n *of the initial study phases, alternatives based on hydrology and hydraulics will be developed. Psomas will also identify other issues such as environmental,. macro -scale costs, and easements that factor into the feasibility of projects: Upon completion of Tasks 1 -4 above, Psomas will work with the City to identify favorable remedial measures. At this time, unconventional and /or multi - benefit solutions will be considered. Given the constraints identified above, a suite of projects /solutions will be proposed. Deliverable: Descriptions of one suite of study alternatives, including discussion of . environmental, cost and easement issues. Task 6 -- Recommendations Based on the Alternatives defined above, projects will be grouped into major.areas and prioritized. Funding will also be considered as part of this effort. A listing and discussion of possible funding sources for the recommended improvements that will eliminate drainage deficiencies and FEMA Zone A areas in the City will be compiled. As specified in the City's RFP, the funding sources to be considered will include, but not be limited to,. CVVWD funding, Federal funding, City funding, and developer built improvements. Other funding sources to be evaluated include drainage fees levied pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq, property assessments, and special taxes. A memorandum type report will be prepared that includes an evaluation of the alternative funding sources, and the conclusions and recommendations for sources to be considered by the City. Task 7 — Master Drainage Plan Preliminary Design'and Cost Estimates Based on the recommendations, preliminary (concept- level) design and cost estimates will be developed for projects throughout the City. For each project, Project Information Sheets will be tabulated and will include: • Description of the improvement • Alignment/location • Section/size Easements • Environmental issues • Cost estimates Master Drainage Plan Scope of Services 2 P S O M A S June 12,200-:1 • It is assumed that environmental and right -of -way data (and City staff) are readily available and staff can participate in providing expertise in these areas. Should projected capital costs be extensive, an implementation (phased expenditure) plan would be developed jointly with the City, balancing the City's priorities and objectives. • • The Plan will include an executive summary suitable for City Council review and approval. Upon approval from the City, the contents of the Master Drainage Plan would include an introduction, planning and design criteria, existing condition evaluation, proposed actions /projects, capital improvement, conclusions and recommendations. Deliverable: A streamlined Master Drainage Plan, focusing on key information required for short-term (5 -10 years) action and implementation. Task S — Master Drainage Plan Hydrology Map As shown in the attached Table of Contents,.the Master Drainage Plan Hydrology Map will be included as an appendix to the Plan report. The map will be created in GIS, with aerial base mapping and topography and storm drain information. Both hard copy and electronic files (ArcView) will be transmitted to the City for use and future updates. Exclusions and Assumptions In developing the cost estimate, the following exclusion /assumptions were made: Exclusions • Formal responses to City Council, additional analyses, or resubmittal of Master Drainage Plan • Field measurements are limited Assumptions . • With the exception of the kick -off meeting, meetings may be held remotely (Internet NetMeetings) – assume up to three (3) additional face -to -face meetings and five (5) remote meetings. • Hydraulic studies only near Cove /City Hall vicinity for FEMA feasibility . • Limited hydrologic modeling— Cove area only • Cost estimates and project information sheets for up to 10 projects • Additional work within the-contract schedule will be performed in accordance with the attached Schedule of Fees. • Reproduction and other reimbursable costs (to be paid directly by the City at cost plus 5 %) • Three (3) copies of review report will be provided. It is assumed that the City will have a preliminary and final review, and that the City will consolidate comments • Seven (7) copies of the final report with electronic files in Adobe pdf format. Master Drainage Plan Scope of Services 5 P S O M AS June 12, 2003 • • Revised Estimate of Fees The following table presents a revised estimate of fees based on the scope of services, assumptions, and exclusions provided above. Description Task 1 Aerial Topographic, Facilities, and Hydrologic Map $20,460 Task 2 Research $4,000 Task 3 Evaluation $53,510. Task 4 Conclusions $2,880 Task 5 Study Alternatives $3,440 Task 6 Recommendations $5,050 Task 7 Master Drainage Plan Preliminary Design & Cost Estimates $8,430 Task 8 Master Drainage Plan Hydrology Map $6,260 Task 9 Meetings, Project Management, QA/QC $16,170 Total Tasks 1' -9 $120,200 Master Drainage Plan 6 P S O M A S Scope of Services June 12,'203 • PS0MAS La Quinta Master Drainage Plan Fee Schedule Effective for duration of project per Project Schedule. CLASSIFICATION RATE ($) Principal -in- Charge $165 Senior Water Resource Consultant $155 Project Manager $140 Project Engineer $110 Engineer/Design Engineer $ 70 Intern $ 50 Hourly rates include direct labor, overhead, fringe benefits and fee. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES • Per the City of-La Quinta, mileage charges will not be reimbursed; parking expenses incurred by office employees are charged at cost. Prints, messenger service, and other direct expenses will be charged at cost plus fire percent. The services of outside consultants will be charged at cost plus five percent. • SPECIAL EQUIPMENT Standard computer and technology costs are incorporated into the hourly rates shown above. Survey and other specialty equipment will be charged at a per unit, per day rate. Master Drainage Plan 7 P S O M A S. Scope of Services June 12, 200_1 City of La Wita DrainagOs-MMer Plan ID Task Name Start 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Half • Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Aar Ma Jun I Jul 1 Notice to Proceed Mon 7!7/03 17 Kick -off Meeting Mon 7/7/03 Baseline Mapping Mon 7114103 ... _ -i— --g____-_.... .... ....- ._......-- - -.._3. Aerial Mapping Mon 7/14/03 Storm Drain plan review Mon 7/14/03 Ground truthing Mon 4dii63 Research Mon 7114103 g .. ........_. _... . ._.... .. ........__...... . Design Crit..eria ..... Mon 7/14/03 Infrastructure assessment Mon 8/11/03 Evaluation Mon 8111103 ... .... .... ........._....__—..._... ..... ..... ....... ...._...._......— .._..... Review of Public Facilities Mon 9/1/03 Assessment of Previous MPD Mon 8111/03 FEMA Evaluation Mon 9/22/03 Percolation Testing Mon 8/11/03 ...................... .......... .... ...... ............ :.... Conclusions Mon 10120/03 Assessment of Problems Mon 10/20/03 Development of Solutions Mon 11/17/03 Funding Opportunities Mon 12/15/03 City Interim Review Mon'1 /12/04 Recommendatlons Mon 212104 Prioritize Capital Projects Mon 2/2104 ........... .._ ... ........ .................. _..,......... Implementation Schedule Mon 2/23/04 Draft Plan Mon 3116104 Draft Master Drainage Plan Mon 3/15/04 Draft Master Drainage.Plan Map Mon 4/5/04 ............. _. . ........._ .. ._........._.._._.......... Revlew Mon 513/04 Final Plan Mon 5/17104 Final Master Drainage Plan Mon 5117/04 Final Master Drainage Plan Ma Mon 5/31!04 Staff Approval Mon 6/21/04 City-Council Approval Fri 712/04 Task Split . La Quinta schedule2 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 6112/03 Progress I Milestone ♦ Summary Rolled Up Task Rolled Up Split Rolled Up Milestone O Page 1 Rolled Up Progress External Tasks; Project Summary External Milestone Deadline ��iJ' 7/2 PSOMAS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 .22 23 24 25 26 27 ' 28 29 30 31 Project: Date: Thu Jun. 30, 2003 1:14PM I • 5,0 INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS. No. 1422 P. 1/3 5.1 Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, personal and public liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Consultant's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. 'rho amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in accordance with the following table: Contract Sum Personal Injury/Properrt r Damage Coverage Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence 560,000 - $300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence Over $300,000 X500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence If such policies include an aggregate limit, such aggregate shall be at least two times the per occurrence amounTrequired herein. Consultant shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Consultant, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Consultant. any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or • indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. ThP term "automobile" Includes, but is not limited to, a land.motor vehicle, trailer or semi-tra(ler designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither, City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and Its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Consultant shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker'& Compensation laws. Consultant shall procure professional errors and omissions liability insurance in an amount acceptable to City. All insurance required by this Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days written notice to City of propossd c.ancellat] The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the Gam all not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's obligation to indemnify City, its officer , employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. ten (10) days notice if cancellation is due to nonpayment of premium. • \\ cLGADMFS1 %PVBWRKSVPwoEatlrez0Jr=CTS12003 PriCIMPSOMAS PsA.doo Pspo 4 of 13 Jun, 30. 2003 1:14PM No, 1422 P. 2/3 resulting from the negligent acts, 5.2 Indemnification. The Consultant s all defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, representatives nd agents, "City indemnitees," from and against any and all actions, suits, proceedings, claims, mands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and, attorneys' fees, for injury to o death of parson(s), for damage to property (including property owned by the City) ( "claims" _-wW#errors and omissions committed by Consultant, its officers, anyone directly or indirectly employed by Consultant, any subcontractor, and agents or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by City's own negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct, or that of its officers or employees. In the event the City indemnitees are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding in any way involving such claims, Consultant shall provide a defense to the City indemnitees, or at the City's option, reimburse the City indemnitees their costs of defense, Including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in defense of such claim. In addition, Cor. *ultant shall be obligated to promptly pay any final judgement or portion thereof rendered against the City - indemn itees. 5.3 Remedies_ In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option; Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. - • b. . Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement and /or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. "The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Consultant's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages t0 persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS- 6,1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning Consultanre performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 6.2 Records. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services inquired by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals, The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy; audit, and make records and transcripts from such records. • UCLOAPMFSI NPUeWRKS\PWDEFr1PROJECTS\2003 Pdet&1PSOMAS PSA doe Page 5 of 13 0 Kick -off Meeting La Quinta Master Drainage Plan 10:00 —11:30 AM -- July 28, 2003 City of La Quinta Attendees: City of La Quinta: • Steve Speer, PE • Nick Nickerson; PE Psomas Team:. • Ken Susilo, PE, Psomas, PM • Vickie Bridenstine, PE, Psomas, PE • Daniel McCroskey, PLS, Psomas, GIS • Doug Hamilton, PE, Exponent, FEMA • Tom Freeman, RG, GeoPentech Agenda: 1. Introductions 2. Project Objectives 3. Review contract, scope, process, roles and responsibilities 4. Task description and required information: • Research and Field data collection • Mapping and GIS data conversion • Hydraulic Modeling • FEMA processing • Percolation testing 5. Acceptance procedures 6. Modifications to scope 7. Communications protocols 8. Data Transfer 9. Final Deliverables - MDP 10. Adjourn r-0 All Steve, Nick, Ken Ken Vickie Daniel Ken Doug Tom Steve, Nick, Ken Steve, Nick Nick, Ken All Ken PSOMAS • PROJECT REPORT Project Report For: City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan As of. 9/05/03 Date Prepared: 9/08/03 Prepared By: Vickie Bridenstine Psomas Project Number: ILAQ010100 Current Status: Active Past Period: Project Startup thru 9/05/03 Work Accomplished During Past Period: The field verification process is complete with a total of 418 catch basins within the the City of La Quinta's public streets being located and measured. A spreadsheet was created to describe each catch basin, it's location, size and condition. In addition a digital picture was taken of each basin and a photo log created to cross referense each catch basin to it's photo We are currently plotting the locations on the topo base. The FEMA backup data and calculations were ordered and Copies were made for the City an d Psomas. The FEMA data has been forwarded to Doug Hamilton from Exponent and he is currently reading and reviewing the information. Psomas has contacted the City's GIS contractor and has received the parcel data for La Quinta. A CD containing city storm drain projects (including atlas /index sheets) in digital format was received �rom the City and the information was uploaded into our project database. Prior to additional review of the atlas /index sheet information the City has promised additional cross reference parcel /project lists to aid in our review. We have met with CVWD to discuss the project. We have ordered additional drainage reports and plans that the district has covering the debris basins and channels within the project area We have researched and compiled the RWQCB permitting requirements for the City of La Quinta Special Problems Encountered: None Additional Comments: We need the following input items from the City: 1) Additional cross reference information for the digital information provided as promised in the kick -off meeting to assist analog and identifying the locations of the information provided 2) Input in locating the detention basins to be included in this study. 3) Suggested locations for the perculation tests. Next Period: 9/08/03 thru 10/03/03 Work to be Accomplished During Next Period: Work will continue on the base map plotting the catch basins and storm drains. Exponent will continue reviewing and evaluate the data from FEMA GeoPentech and Sladden will determine the perculation testing method and with the City's input determine the testing locations Special Problems Anticipated: None • Additional Comments: The project continues to be on schedule and is being performed within budget A8.3.1 b • • 0 PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 10/8/03 Date Prepared 10/8/03 Prepared by: Ken Susilo Psomas Project Number 1LAQ010100 Work Accomplished Special Problems Encountered Work to be Accomplished Special Problems Anticipated • Field reconaissance and photos of facilities taken • Data Collection and GIS coordination • Water Quality NPDES permit requirements identified • Percolation testing sites identified and potential alternative methods proposed • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data received and under review • Met with CVWD and identified agency concerns Staffing change: Vickie Bridenstine has left Psomas; proposed replacement is Bill Whittenberg, PE, DEE • Meet with City to discuss reorganization • Finalize organization and presentation of field data • Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available • Complete FIS review and identify strategy • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling None Additional Comments None MA1LAQ0 I010MAdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2003.10.08.doc 1 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S • F- -I LJ PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 10/31/03 Date Prepared 10/31/03 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg Psomas Project Number ILAQ010100 Work Accomplished Special Problems Encountered Work to be Accomplished Special Problems Anticipated • Reviewed 1987 MDP (Task 2) • Prepared draft Table of Contents for MDP (Task 2.6) • Reviewed Hydraulic Design Criteria (Task 2.2) • Data Collection and GIS coordination (Task 1) • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data under review (Task 3.2) • Prepared Draft Perc Test Protocol None • Meet with City to discuss reorganization • Finalize organization and presentation of field data • Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Complete Perc Test Protocol None Additional Comments None MA I LAQO 10 1 MAdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2003.10.3Ldoc 1 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S U n U 0 PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 11/07/03 Date Prepared 11/07/03 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number ILAQ010100 Work Accomplished • Reviewing as- builts and plotting/digitizing existing Cove drainage facilities for base map (Task 1) • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data under review (Task 3.2) Special Problems None Encountered Work to be Accomplished • Meet with City to discuss progress during week of 9/24 • Finalize organization and presentation of field data • Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Complete Perc Test Protocol • Send draft base map to City (Task 1) Special Problems None Anticipated Additional Comments None I MA1LAQ0 I 010MAdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2003.11.07.doc 1 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S • 0 n LJ PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 11/14/03 Date Prepared 11/14/03 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number 1LAQ010100 Work Accomplished Special Problems Encountered Work to be Accomplished • Reviewing as- builts and plotting/digitizing existing Cove drainage facilities for base map (Task 1) • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data under review (Task 3.2) • Sent draft base maps to City, for information only — not for review (Task 1) Need to verify datums of benchmarks shown on City as- builts Need to verify if City has drainage requirements included in project conditions of approval Would like to meet with City to discuss progress during week of 11/24 Finalize organization and presentation of field data Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) Complete Perc Test Protocol. The draft protocol under review by Sladden Engineering. Special Problems None Anticipated Additional Comments None MAILAQ010100WdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2003.11.14.doc 1 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S • • 0 PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 11/21/03 Date Prepared 11/21/03 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number ILAQ010100 Work Accomplished • Reviewing as- builts and plotting/digitizing existing Cove drainage facilities for base map (Task 1) • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data under review (Task 3.2) Special Problems • Need to verify datum of benchmarks shown on Encountered City as- builts • Need to verify if City has drainage requirements included in project conditions of approval Work to be Accomplished • Would like to meet with City to discuss progress during week of 11 /24 • Finalize organization and presentation of field data • Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Complete Perc Test Protocol. The draft protocol under review by Sladden Engineering. Special Problems None Anticipated Additional Comments None M: 1 LAQ0101MAdmin \Progress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2003.11.21.doc 1 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S • • n U PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 11/26/03 Date Prepared 11/26/03 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number ILAQ010100 Work Accomplished • Reviewing as- builts and plotting/digitizing existing Cove drainage facilities for base map (Task 1) • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data under review (Task 3.2) Special Problems • Need to verify datum of benchmarks shown on Encountered City as- builts; Riverside County is being contacted to verify this Work to be Accomplished • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Would like to meet with City to discuss progress during week of 12/10 • Finalize organization and presentation of field data • Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Complete Perc Test Protocol. The draft protocol under review by Sladden Engineering. Special Problems None Anticipated Additional Comments None MA1 LAQ0101MAdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2003.11.26.doc 1 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S • 0 0 PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client Project Name Progress Period Date Prepared Prepared by: Psomas Project Number City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan Through 12/11/03 12/11/03 Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez 1LAQ010100 Work Accomplished • Reviewing as- builts and plotting/digitizing existing Cove drainage facilities for base map (Task 1) • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data under review (Task 3.2) Special Problems • None Encountered Work to be Accomplished • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Would like to meet with City to discuss progress during week of 12/17 • Finalize organization and presentation of field data • Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Complete Perc Test Protocol. The draft protocol under review by Sladden Engineering. Special Problems None Anticipated Additional Comments None M:U LAQ010100\1dminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2003.12.1 Ldoc 1 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S V ,I 11 u • • PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client Project Name Progress Period Date Prepared Prepared by: Psomas Project Number Work Accomplished City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan Through 12/18/03 12/17/03 Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez ILAQ010100 • Reviewing as- builts and plotting /digitizing existing Cove drainage facilities for base map (Task 1) • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data under review (Task 3.2) • Completed Perc Test Protocol and reviewed by Sladden Engineering. See attached. • Updated schedule. See attached. Special Problems None Encountered Work to be Accomplished • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Meet with City to discuss progress on 1/8 • Finalize organization and presentation of field data • Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) Special Problems None Anticipated Additional Comments None M:ULAQ010100\AdminTrogress reportsTROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2003.12.18.doc 1 12/17/2003 P S 0 M A S 0 1 GeoPentech Memorandum To: William Whittenberg CC: Ken Susilo From: Eric Fordham Date: 12/17/03 Re: La Quinta Percolation Tests Purpose: To obtain percolation estimates for various soil types prevalent within storm water retention • basins within the City of La Quinta. Objective: Conduct large diameter infiltrometer tests to characterize percolation rates for various soil types and statistically analyze results to identify variability in percolation rates for given soil types and between differing soil types. Utilize direct measurements of percolation rates in retention basins, if possible. Compare results of infiltrometer tests to percolation rates estimated for retention basins. Methods: Large diameter infiltrometer tests will be conducted in accordance with the procedures developed by Bouwer, et al., 19971, as follows: 1. Steel cylinders 2 feet in diameter by 1 to 1.5 feet long with a beveled edge is driven straight down into the ground about 3 to 4 inches and soil is packed against the inside and outside of the cylinder to get good soil - cylinder contact. 1 Predicting Infiltration and Ground Water Mounding for Artificial Recharge; Bouwer, H., Back, J. and Oliver, J., October 1997. • Ir% December 17, 2003 • 2. Water is poured into the cylinder avoiding soil erosion to fill the cylinder to the top and clock time is recorded. 3. The water is allowed to drop about 2 to 4 inches, the drop is measured, clock time is recorded, and the cylinder is filled back up to the top. 4. This is repeated for about 6 hours or until accumulated infiltration has reached about 20 inches, whichever comes first. 5. The last drop of the water level is measured and the clock time is recorded. 6. A shovel or backhoe is used to dig outside the cylinder and through the total depth of the wetted soil to measure the lateral and vertical spreading of wetting. At least 3 and preferably 5 large- diameter infiltrometer tests should be conducted for each soil type identified in each basin that will be part of the study. Retention basins expecting to receive sufficient storm water flow so as to form a pool within the basin can also be tested to estimate their percolation rate. The filling of the basin needs to be the result of a discrete flow that fills the basin followed by a period of no flow where drops in pool level are due to evaporation and percolation. Basins that receive continuous flow as a result of return flow from irrigation or from other sources would require accurate flow measurements using a weir or other comparable device. The level that the pool drops would be measured with a pressure transducer and data logging system located at a secure site within the basin. Water • level measured with the transducer /data logger would be correlated to a rating table for the basin that relates surface elevation in the basin to volume. Multiple cycles of filling and percolation are preferred to obtain long -term percolation rates that may be sustainable in the event of a wetter than normal rainfall year. 0 1 2 • I City of La Quinta Kick-off Meeting 0 days Mon 717103 i Mon 717103 . Task I Basallno Mapping . ........... ..... .731 days Mae 717163 1 Thu 1115104 Adds! Mapping 5 days Men 7,71031 I Fri 1/11103 ........... 20 . days �4 Mon 2a,6 i Fri i gsI6 biifiiii-4�15R ............. 9 days M Iff'iyy Tua 12130103 ................. . ....... . . . . ....... ...... Ground ouNing . . .... ... 9 days Man 115/04 Th. 1/15104 Rose '72 clya M.W9129163 --Frl1116104 2.1 Revew ia 10 Man 3/1104 Fri 10/31103 i.2 Hydrologic and iijdriktfic drihuia� . ................ . ....... F .......... Mo'-n 1020/03 . Fd 10131103 ---2:3 RaWl— -1§6fti Do .......... . ........... ............ -.14 -dyzi----Mor-1 . 2�03 4i ..... .. ... ........... Fd'l'-/-i 610-4 I . . ..... ..... 2.6 Summarize Information for Draina 10 day. Man 115/041 Fri 1116/04 Task 3 Evaluation 93 days Mon 1016103 Mon 219104 Field Vartficatt- 67 days Micin�iOIIW031 Fd 1123/04 .....................Ass . . s - .................__..20....... -.- Assessment of Previous M DP days M W I bit Fri 1117103 • CITY OF LA QUINTA Drainage Master Plan 3.3 FEMA (Zone A) 62 lisp Mon 1016103 i Fri If910,11 Exponent ... . . ..... . .. .... . . ....... ........ i.-- FEW Evaluation 62'day. MoWi0/&6 Firl i/g/0,11 q Percolation Testing 3 30 days M Mon 12r22/03 M Mon 2/9104 Task 4 C.n�ilutslwni 3 39 day. M Mon =104 F Fri 3126104 * 4.1 Prepare �ociion oi . ........ . .. M.n.iW641. . .—Frl-31-5-10-4 .. .. ......... . � io days F �4 Mon 2a,6 i Fit 2/13104 Development of Solutions 9 9 days M Mon 2J16/04: F Fit 227/04 Funding opportunities 1 10 days F Fri 2120/04 F Fri 315104 4.2 City Review 1 10 days M Mon 3/3104; F Fri 31191G4 City Interim R-le. 1 10 day. M Man 3/1104 Fri 3119/04 ......... . .......... . . ............ ............ . .... . ... - . . .. . ..................... . . ................ . ....... F i FR-U21310-4 . ......... . ...... T"k'� Slucly Alternatives z z*days--, M Mon 3 /15/04; . .... - -Fri-4116104 .... . ... . ................................ . ............... . ....... . ...... . ................. . . ................. . ......... W WWjii'� - - - ----- *"*"**-** ' 5.2 City Review i id days . . Mon . 3129/ 04 1 1 F F I d 419/D4 . 1 1121. . - - - '*'* " "" " TasW 6 Reaunmendations""'- 1 15-daya�- " " Mo� 11112/04. - -'- Fd 4130104 . . . . ..................................... .... . . ............. . . . . .............. . . . ........... . ........... . . ... i ... ....... . ... . ........... 421/04 4.121..04 .... C] I Page 1 PSOMASI C' M !A C] • • PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client Project Name Progress Period Date Prepared Prepared by: Psomas Project Number Work Accomplished City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan Through 1/7/04 1/7/04 Bill Whittenberg, Alex Meiiez 1LAQ010100 • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data under review (Task 3.2) • Determine initial set of potential alternatives to reduce and/or eliminate drainage deficiencies and FEMA Zone A areas (Task 5, see attached) • Identify additional data required (see attached) Special Problems • The analysis of public facilities (Task 3.1) and Encountered identification of potential alternatives (Task 5) will likely require more extensive hydraulic modeling than previously required. Further guidance from City will be discussed during 1/8/04 meeting. Work to be Accomplished • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Meet with City to discuss progress on 1/8/04 • Finalize organization and presentation of field data • Need to determine whether data catalog will be made available • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) Special Problems Anticipated None Additional Comments None MAI LAQO 10 1 MAdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2004.01.07.doc 1 1/7/2004 P S 0 M A S :' r,• • Summary of Data Needed for La Quinta MDP A. Calle Tampico storm drain plans • (2) 2.5'x8' RCB, east of Eisenhower B. Desert Club Drive storm drain plans • 60" RCP, north of 52nd Ave. C. 52 "d Ave Storm Drain Plans? Which direction does this drain — easterly or westerly? D. Clarification of drainage facility (catch basin ?) along 52nd Ave, east of Desert Club Drive? Does it convey runoff from 52nd Ave to the 60" RCP in Desert Club Drive? E. La Quinta Evacuation Channel (from CVWD) • City plan set #81014 (job #13720): sheets C -02, C -03, C -04, C -101, C- 102 • City plan set #80005 (job #10714): sheets C -0 1 (better copy), C -02, C -03 • Summary of Potential Options for Future Drainage Improvements 1. Construct storm drain along Eisenhower, from Tampico (or Sinaloa) to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Slope is approximately 0.25 %. • 2. Construct storm drain along Bermudas Ave, from 52nd Ave to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Slope is approximately 0.07 %. 3. Investigate/Utilize retention in Heritage Club golf course and lakes (adjacent to Del Gato) 4. Investigate possible retention (underground ?) in area northwest of intersection between Calle Kalima and La Fonda. 5. Construct storm drain from 52nd Ave, from Desert Club Drive to Washington, and subsequently along Washington, from 52nd Ave to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. [This will not work if 52nd Ave drains westerly.] MA LAQO10100 \engr \design \hydr \Summary of Data Needed and Drainage Options for La Quinta MDP.doc • • PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 1/15/04 Date Prepared 1/15/04 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number 1LAQ010100 Work Accomplished Special Problems Encountered Work to be Accomplished Special Problems Anticipated • Met with City on 1/8/04 to discuss progress, alternatives, data needs and budget • FEMA (Flood Insurance Studies) data reviewed and discussed with the City. (Task 3.2) • Additional data is needed to complete the analysis (see attached) • The analysis of public facilities (Task 3.1) and identification of potential alternatives (Task 5) will likely require more extensive hydraulic modeling than previously required. • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Prepare updated percolation protocol and schedule percolation testing (Sladden) • Prepare Letter of Map Revision to FEMA (Exponent) • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) None Additional Comments None MAILAQ010100\AdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2004.01.15.doc 1 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S F"Ir • Summary of Data Needed for La Quinta MDP A. Calle Tampico storm drain plans • (2) 15'x8' RCB, east of Eisenhower B. Desert Club Drive storm drain plans • 60" RCP, north of 52nd Ave. • Any catch basins? C. Data for all detention, retention and infiltration facilities used by City, including private facilities (golf course lakes, etc.) • Plans (inlet structures, outlet structures, spillways)? • Design criteria (flow, freeboard, infiltration rates, etc.)? • Topo survey (sufficient to establish spillway lengths /elevations and elevation- storage relationships) D. Drainage facility (catch basin ?) along 52nd Ave, east of Desert Club Drive, and outlet works to adjacent golf course • Plans? • Design criteria (flow, velocity)? E. La Quinta Evacuation Channel (from CVWD) • • City plan set #81014 (job #13720): sheets C -02, C -03, C -04, C -101, C- 102 • City plan set #80005 (job #10714): sheets C -01 (better copy), C -02, C -03 is F. Street improvement plans (or sufficient cross sectional and slope data to determine storage and conveyance capacity of streets) MAILAQ0101 MAdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2004.01.15.doc 2 4/6/2004 P S 0 M A S 0 0 0 PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 2/6/04 Date. Prepared 2/6/04 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number 1LAQ010100 Work Accomplished • Received electronic files of various plans (including Tradition Golf Course) from City website on 1/23/04. Currently updating storm drain base map and assessing additional data needs (Task 1). • Received copy of Hydrology Report for Tradition Golf Course on 1/26/04. Currently reviewing to see if data is sufficient for modeling (Task 1). • Encoding existing storm drain data into GIS database and preparing setup for existing stormwater model (Task 3.1). Special Problems • It had been determined that the golf course north of Citrus is used Encountered for detention of City stormwater runoff. More data is needed on the detention/retention facilities of this golf course (such as a hydrologic report). • Data recently provided by the City is currently being evaluated to determine if additional data is needed to complete the analysis. • The analysis of public facilities (Task 3.1) and identification of potential alternatives (Task 5) will likely require more extensive hydraulic modeling than previously required. Work to be Accomplished • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Prepare updated percolation protocol and schedule percolation testing (Sladden) • Prepare Letter of Map Revision to FEMA (Exponent) • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Conduct percolation testing (Sladden) Special Problems Anticipated None Additional Comments None MA1LAQ010100WdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPM 2004.02.06.doc 4/6/2004 P S O M A S 0 U PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 2/20/04 Date Prepared 2/19/04 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number 1LAQ010100 Work Accomplished Special Problems Encountered Work to be Accomplished Special Problems Anticipated • Encoding recently received storm drain data into GIS database (Task 3.1) • Initiated setup of GIS stormwater model for existing conditions (Task 3.1). • Awaiting hydrologic data on golf course north of Citrus. • Data recently provided by the City is currently being evaluated to determine if additional data is needed to complete the analysis. • The analysis of public facilities (Task 3.1) and identification of potential alternatives (Task 5) will likely require more extensive hydraulic modeling than previously required. • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Prepare updated percolation protocol and schedule percolation testing (Sladden) • Prepare Letter of Map Revision to FEMA (Exponent) • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Conduct percolation testing (Sladden) None Additional Comments None • MA1LAQ0101MAdmin \Progress reports \PROJECT PROGRESS REPM2004.02.20.doc 4/6/2004 1 PSOMAS 0 • 0 PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 2/27/04 Date Prepared 2/27/04 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number 1LAQ010100 Work Accomplished Special Problems Encountered Work to be Accomplished Special Problems Anticipated • Encoding recently received storm drain data into GIS database (Task 3.1) • Continuing setup of GIS stormwater model for existing conditions (Task 3.1). • Received hydrology reports for Citrus Golf Course. • Data recently provided by the City is currently being evaluated to determine if additional data is needed to complete the analysis. • The analysis of public facilities (Task 3.1) and identification of potential alternatives (Task 5) will likely require more extensive hydraulic modeling than previously required. • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Prepare updated percolation protocol and schedule percolation testing (Sladden) • Prepare Letter of Map Revision to FEMA (Exponent) • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Conduct percolation testing (Sladden) None Additional Comments None MAILAQ0 I010MAdminTrogress reportsTROJECT PROGRESS REPM 2004.02.27.doc 4/6/2004 P S O M A S • • PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Client City of La Quinta Project Name Master Drainage Plan Progress Period Through 3/4/04 Date Prepared 3/4/04 Prepared by: Bill Whittenberg, Alex Menez Psomas Project Number 1LAQ010100 Work Accomplished Special Problems Encountered Work to be Accomplished • Completed encoding recently received storm drain data into GIS database (Task 3.1) • Continuing setup of GIS stormwater model for existing conditions (Task 3.1). • Reviewing hydrology reports for Citrus Golf Course. • Plans are still needed for the existing 60" RCP storm drain in Desert Club Drive, from 52 "d Ave to the Evacuation Channel. • The analysis of public facilities (Task 3.1) and identification of potential alternatives (Task 5) will likely require more extensive hydraulic modeling than previously required. • Prepare memo summarizing drainage requirements • Prepare updated percolation protocol and schedule percolation testing (Sladden) • Prepare Letter of Map Revision to FEMA (Exponent) • Complete FIS review and identify strategy (Task 3.2) • Complete inventory of Cove and initiate hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 3.1) • Conduct percolation testing (Sladden) Special Problems Anticipated None Additional Comments None • MAILAQ0 I01MAdminTrogress reports\PROJECT PROGRESS REPORt 2004.03.04.doc 4/6/2004 1 PSOMAS • City of La Quinta MDP Summary of GIS Data Input for Existing Storm Drain Infrastructure ■ 32 plan sets, 283 sheets ■ 471 pipes GIS Fields: Pipe ID# Upstream Manhole ID# (blank) Upstream Invert Elevation Upstream Station Downstream Manhole ID# (blank) Downstream Invert Elevation Downstream Station Pipe Material Pipe Diameter Length Slope Distance from road centerline Direction from road centerline Culvert Height (blank) Culvert Width (blank) • 175 manholes GIS Fields: Manhole ID Manhole Plan Number Manhole Station Manhole Invert Elevation Manhole Rim Elevation Manhole Material (blank) ■ 214 catch basins GIS Fields: Catch Basin ID Catch Basin Plan Catch Basin Width 1• • • Draft: For Information Only Not for Review DRAINAGE FACILITY FIELD SUMMARY STORM DRAIN DATA Field Description Units Variable type PIPE ID unique pipe ID number ft number US MH ID upstream manhole ID number ft number US INV upstream node invert elevation ft number US STA upstream node station ft number DS MH ID downstream manhole ID number ft number DS INV downstream node invert elevation ft number DS STA downstream node station ft number PIPE—MAT pipe material RCP = reinforced concrete pipe CMP = corrugated metal pipe PVC = polyvinyl chloride pipe CON = concrete box culvert or channel NAT = natural open channel HDPE = high density of eth lene string PIPE DI pipe diameter in number LENGTH length of conduit ft number SLOPE slope of conduit % number DIST RDCL dist from road centerline ft number DIR RDCL Idirection of pipe relative to road centerline (north, south, east, west) N/A strip CULV HT height of a box culvert ft number CULV WI width of a box culvert ft number CHANNEL DATA RIPRAP SIZE size of riprap ft number RIPRAP DIM riprap dimension ftxft strip CHL TOPW channel to width ft number CHL SIDE SLOPE slope of channel sides ft:ft strip CHL BOTW channel bottom width ft number CHL FL Ichannel flowline elevation ft I number CATCH BASIN DATA CB ID unique catch basin ID number number CB PLAN NO catch basin number strip CB WI length of catch basin ft number MANHOLE DATA MH ID unique manhole ID number N/A number MH PLAN NO manhole number from plans N/A strip MH STA manhole station ft number MH INV manhole invert elevation ft number MH RIM manhole rim elevation ft number MH MAT manhole material N/A strip MISC DATA PLAN NAME plan name N/A strip PLAN NO Ian set number N/A strip TRACT tract number N/A strip VDATUM vertical datum NGVD29 or NAVD88 N/A strip LOCATION street name or description of pipe location N/A strip PLAN DATE plan set date N/A date DRG BASIN storm drain basin ID serving the conduit N/A strip NOTES any pertinent notes N/A strip Drainage Facility Field summary.xls 0 Govs • GOY e pv'e PW406 • Tq'r' Nrtj SETS Con'fz-F-5poMr-> -17-0- INDEX (FLOOD AND STORM WATER CONTROL) 30 HYDROLOGY MAP 31 STORM WATER CHANNEL 32 DRAINAGE, STORM DRAINS 33 RETENTION BASINS & NUISANCE WATER SYSTEMS 34 PUMP STATIONS A A A A A A A A A A • A A A A A A A A A A CD 01 Index THROUGH 80005 -0201 (629mb) CD 02 81013 -01 THROUGH 90044 -08 (673mb) CD #3 90052 -00 THROUGH End (99079 -01) (364mb) ALPHA DIRECTORY PLANSET# IMP TYPE ;9 ADAMS / DUNE PALMS 98025 33 LSO H 01080 32 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 8841 88024 32 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-02 89047 32 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 90-01 90052 32 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91 -01 OR 91 -01A 91034 32 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91 -01A 91030 32 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 92 -01 92027 32 SESSMENT DISTRICT 92 -01 93034 32 AZUL AND CAMINO ROSADA 00032 33 BOTTLEBRUSH / SAGUARO DRIVES 00060 32 DESERT CLUB TRACT LOT 1189 99078 32 DUNA FAIRWAYS 01074 32 DUNE PALMS PLAZA 02030 32 DUNES PALMS PLAZA 97035 32 DURANGO / IUAREZ CIP 2000 -04 01070 .32 EAGLE HARDWARE aka LOWE'S 97004 32 OWER AND COACHELLA DRIVE 96011 32 EVACUATION CHANNEL (LA QUINTA) 80005 31 EVACUATION CHANNEL. (LA QUINTA) 81013 31 EVACUATION CHANNEL (LA QUINTA) 81014 31 EVACUATION C RANNEL (LA QUINTA) 81020 31 ACUATION CHANNEL 81019 31 HAMMOND RESIDENCE 01076 32 HERITAGE CLUB 87001 32 HERTIAGE CLUB 86006 32 KINGDOM HALL OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESS 02038 32 LA GUNA DE LA PAZ 83042 32 LA QUINT COURT 01112 32 LA QUINTA CORPORATE CENTRE 00016 32 LA QUINTA HOTEL (EXPANSION) 88016 32 LA QUINTA HOTEL 88002 32 LA QUINTA HOTEL 97016 32 LA QUINTA POLO ESTATES 99018 32 LA QUINTA SELF STORAGE II 01057 31 Page 1 of3 • • LA QUINTA STORM WATER PROJECT LA QUINTA STORM WATER PROJECT LA QUINTA STORM WATER PROJECT LAKE LA QUINTA LLAGE AT THE PALMS MADISON AND AVE 58 MIRA FLORES MISC. ImPROVMENTS CIP 2001 -09 MONTICELLO MONTICELLO MONTICELO MOUNTAIN VIEW C.C. (CLUBHOUSE) MOUNTAIN VIEW CIC NORMAN COURSE CLUBHOUSE NORMAN COURSE PAINTED COVE PALM ROYALE PALMILLA PGA WEST/ MADISON & AIRPORT PGA WEST POINT HAPPY RANCHOFORTUNADO RANCHO LA QUINTA — CASTTAS RANCHO LA QUINTA RACQUET / CUL-DE -SAC REUNION REUNION RONDO DRAIN CHANNEL ROUDEL AND CORTEZ LANE SANDFILTER IMPROVEMTS (VARIOUS LOCATIONS) SANTA ROSA PLAZA SANTAROSA PLAZA STONE CREEK STORM CHANNEL THE CENTRE AT LA QUINTA THE CENTRE AT LA QUINTA THE CENTRE AT LA QUINTA THE CITRUS COURSE / CLUBHOUSE PARKING THE CITRUS THE CITRUS THE ENCLAVE MOUNTAIN ESTATES THE ENCLAVE THE ESPLANADE THE HIDEAWAY (JEFFERSON STREET) THE HIDEAWAY (PORTOFINO AND DONA). THE HIDEAWAY (VIA CAPR" �g 1D� THE SEASONS �PTRADTTIONS TRILOGY SHEA HOMES TRILOGY SHEA HOMES TRILOGY SHEA HOMES TRUDGY SHEA HOMES TRILOGY SHEA HOMES • 85023 85021 85022 90028 99063 00034 02037 02065 01038 02009 02042 03052 02020 99002 01052 90042 98017 01007 99055 97032 03032 01078 94029 94031 95016 99021 99031 64001 02080 02001 02004 03068 86003 00031 02097 99079 89036 01018 90038 90044 87006 03066 03065 03063 03062 96008 99051 02105 02108 02111 02112 03023 31 31 31 31 32 32 32 32,33 33 32 32 32 32 30 30 32 33 32 32 32 32 32 32' 32 32 32 31, 32 31 32 33 33 32 31 30 31 30 32,34 32 32 31 32 32 32 32 32 34 32 32 32 32 32 32 Page 2 of 3 TRIIACY SHEA HOMES 03025 32 TRILOGY SHEA HOMES 03026 32 TRIIAGY SHEA HOMES 03027 32 VILLAGE CLUB DRIVE /PLACE 03013 32 WASHINGTON SQUARE 92020 30 WASHINGTON SQUARE 93028 30 WESTWARD HO /DUNE PALMS 02026 32 WESTWARD HO: E/O JEFFERSON 02018 32 WORLD GYM 00013 32 ""Note All files are "&' files. Total number of files: 718 Total size of folder on disk:' 1.62 GB (1,749,053,440 bytes) • • Page 3 of 3 • •f CITY OF LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 88-ml-, PREPARED BY: KICAK & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS 41 -555 COOK STREET , SUITE 220 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE: (619) 341 -9544 J SEPH KICAK; R.C.E 21775 D T ' an ,► a CITY OFFICIALS MAYOR : WILLIAM R. HOYLE MAYOR PRO TEM JOHN PENA COUNCIL MEMBER DALE BOHNENBERGER COUNCIL MEMBER JUDITH COX COUNCIL MEMBER STANLEY SNIFF, CITY CLERK SAUNDRA JUHOLA CITY -MANAGER RONALD KIEDROWSKI DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /CITY ENGINEER FRANK -R. REYNOLDS CITY of lA QUINTA Pten Set Nm 8 1 f R'Zfi811F�I to ..1�1111111111111� �111€Illlllllllrll 11111"E Ell; ��t1t191tH11!1 {I° 111E1t1[I�II[II ,A111�11rrI :11111 ll[III[IIIIl11111 (tti�lf C,IIEEIIt €tl �lulalrculcrlrr � -. 't1U11p111111E�' IEI�I[IIIIRIiI' - '11111[Illgr,� I VIC4NITY MAP J N O o co\ mo • • • SCALE T 1" - 300 Ll Ll Ll Li Ll Li Li Ll Li Li Ll L1 8 0 aoa�Da00oa��oo�oo, a0000000�aa 0 0 W W a INDEX OF SHEETS -s GENERAL NOTES - 1) ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, LATEST' EDITION, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (JULY 1984 EDITIONI. 21 NO CONSTRUCTION IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE PERMITS ISSUED BY THE CITY OF LA QUINTA- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE TO ONSITE, OFFSITE AND ADJACENT UTILITIES,FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS -FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES THAT MAY OCCUR FROM STORM WATER RUNOFF AND /OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM ANY AND ALL WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PLANS. 5) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK AND SHALL MAINTAIN ALL FACILITIES, COMPLETED AND UNCOMPLETED, UNTIL ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. 6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS -LA OUINTA (619) 564 -2246, AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 7) THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY- RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND 1 LL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) 1 -800 - 422 - 4133 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (619) 398 -5854 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 1 -800 - 422 - 4133 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY (619) 347 -8701 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 16191 398 - 2651 PALMER CABLE VISION (619) 340- 1312 8) THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR J08 SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY - CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS;AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. 9) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL A.C. PAVEMENT, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER, ETC, WHICH HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR SAID REPLACEMENT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 10) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE WITH LIKE IN KIND ANY LANDSCAPING OR SPECIAL FEATURES SUCH AS TURF, GROUND COVER, TREES, BUSHES, IRRIGATION LINES, ETC, _ -WHICH ARE REMOVED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR WORK SHALL BE INCL.UDF,O W THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 11) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12) ADJUSTMENT OF WATER VALVE COVERS AND MANHOLE COVERS SHALL TAKE PLACE AFTER A.C. PAVEMENT OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: IQ CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. M.H. NA 251. 2O CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STDL M.N. No. 252. 03 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. CB 100, 8 LOCAL DEPRESSION NO. 2 LO 201 (CASE 01. ® CONSTRUCY TRANSITION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. T.S. 303. 0 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE COLLAR PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. M803. © CONSTRUCT MANHOLE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. M.M. No. 254. O7 CONSTRUCT PRESSURE MANHOLE FRAME 8 COVER PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL- DISTRICT STD. M.H.256. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN FLOW -W EXISTING WATER LINE —S — EXISTING SEWER LINE —_G - -- EXISTING GAS LINE (L LATERAL DDEEPRESSION —T EXISTING G. T. E. CONDUIT EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT i GTY,rLp CUiNTq Plan Set UI TYPICAL CATCH BASIN LATERAL LOCATION 1 PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER No SCALE !!! �S 0 a� Ltm 0 0 0 o S S o g g SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION LIMITS W W W W W W W W W P a i a Q a i i a 1 PLAN SHEET ,V�� P INDEX-GENERAL NOTE- CONSTRUCTION NOTES 2 CALLE COLIMA STA 0- 00.00 TO STA. 7 +90.83 .. 3 AVENIDA MENDOZA STA 7 +90.83 TO STA. 17.00.60 CALLI: TECATE 4 AVENIDA MENDOZA STA I7 +OOD0 TO STA. 27 +70.83 INDEXMAP CALLE MADRID STA. 27.70.83 TO STA. 34 +00.00 ' 6 CALLE MADRID STA. 34 +00.00 TO STA. 45 +00.00 2� 7 CALLE MADRID STA. 45.00.00 TO STA 33.00.00 LEGEND •'I CATCH BASIN a CALLE . MADRID STA. 55 +00.00 TO STA. 65.00.23 CUR FACE, I.. �j I: CURB 9 GUTTER, _ ' -s GENERAL NOTES - 1) ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, LATEST' EDITION, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (JULY 1984 EDITIONI. 21 NO CONSTRUCTION IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE PERMITS ISSUED BY THE CITY OF LA QUINTA- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE TO ONSITE, OFFSITE AND ADJACENT UTILITIES,FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS -FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES THAT MAY OCCUR FROM STORM WATER RUNOFF AND /OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM ANY AND ALL WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PLANS. 5) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK AND SHALL MAINTAIN ALL FACILITIES, COMPLETED AND UNCOMPLETED, UNTIL ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. 6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS -LA OUINTA (619) 564 -2246, AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 7) THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY- RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND 1 LL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) 1 -800 - 422 - 4133 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (619) 398 -5854 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 1 -800 - 422 - 4133 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY (619) 347 -8701 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 16191 398 - 2651 PALMER CABLE VISION (619) 340- 1312 8) THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR J08 SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY - CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS;AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. 9) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL A.C. PAVEMENT, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER, ETC, WHICH HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR SAID REPLACEMENT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 10) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE WITH LIKE IN KIND ANY LANDSCAPING OR SPECIAL FEATURES SUCH AS TURF, GROUND COVER, TREES, BUSHES, IRRIGATION LINES, ETC, _ -WHICH ARE REMOVED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR WORK SHALL BE INCL.UDF,O W THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 11) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12) ADJUSTMENT OF WATER VALVE COVERS AND MANHOLE COVERS SHALL TAKE PLACE AFTER A.C. PAVEMENT OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: IQ CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. M.H. NA 251. 2O CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STDL M.N. No. 252. 03 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. CB 100, 8 LOCAL DEPRESSION NO. 2 LO 201 (CASE 01. ® CONSTRUCY TRANSITION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. T.S. 303. 0 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE COLLAR PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. M803. © CONSTRUCT MANHOLE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD. M.M. No. 254. O7 CONSTRUCT PRESSURE MANHOLE FRAME 8 COVER PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL- DISTRICT STD. M.H.256. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN FLOW -W EXISTING WATER LINE —S — EXISTING SEWER LINE —_G - -- EXISTING GAS LINE (L LATERAL DDEEPRESSION —T EXISTING G. T. E. CONDUIT EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT i GTY,rLp CUiNTq Plan Set UI TYPICAL CATCH BASIN LATERAL LOCATION 1 PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER No SCALE !!! �S 0 a� Ltm • • SEE SHEET 5 (MAINLINE) 1 SEE SHEET 4 (MAINLINE) SEE SHEET 3 (MAINLINE) SEE SHEET 2 (MAINLINE). J JI LEGEND PROPOSED STORM DRAIN W_ - EXISTING WATER LINE 5 EXISTING SEWER LINE ----------- EXISTING EXISTING GAS LINE -T -7- EXISTING C.T.E. CONDUIT EXISTINO STORM DRAIN -� -�- -� EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT GENERAL NOTES I. ALL YORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS. THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTAINED 1N THE AGREEMENT. THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (JULY 1984 EDITION). 2. NO CONSTRUCTION IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE PERMITS ISSUED BY THE CIfY'OF LA OUINTA - 'PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE, RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO ONSITE. OFFSITE AND ADJACENT UTILITIES. FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES THAT MAY OCCUR FROM STORM WATER RUNOFF AND /OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING. FROM ANY AND ALL WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL'BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK AND SMALL MAINTAIN ALL FACILITIES. COMPLETED AND UNCOMPLETED. UNTIL ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - LA OUINTA (6191 564 -2246. AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. T. THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILIT-IES. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) 1- 800 - 422 -4133 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 619- 398 -3834 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 1- 800-422 -4133 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 619 -347 -8701 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 619 - 398 -2651 PALMER CABLE VISION 619 - 340 -1312 9. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SMALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY- THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SMALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS- AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND. INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY. REAL OR ALLEGED. IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT. EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL PRESERVE EX157ING SURVEY MONUMENTS. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL A.C. PAVEMENT. CONCRETE CURB AND . CUTTER. CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER ETC -, WHICH HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR SAID RELACEMENT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. It. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE WITH LIKE AND KIND ANY LANDSCAPING OR SPECIAL FEATURES SUCH AS TURF. GROUND COVER. TREES. BUSHES. IRRIGATION LINES. ETC. WHICH ARE REMOVED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR WORK SMALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 12. ADJUSTMENT OF WATER VALVE COVERS AND MANHOLE COVERS SHALL TAKE PLACE AFTER PAVEMENT OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED. INDEX MAP SCALE: I-- 3O CONSTRUCTION NOTES y INDEX OF SHEETS 1 CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT f7 STO. ONG. NO. MH 231. Q2 CONSTRUCT MANNOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SHEET NO- DESCRIPTION LIMITS STD. DWG. NO. MM 232. ' 1 PLAN SHEET INDEX - GENERAL NOTES - CONSTRUCTION NOTES Q CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STO. OWC. NO. C9 100. 6 LOCAL DEPRESSION NO. 2 LO 201 (CASE BINODOTED PER DETAIL BELOW LEFT. 2 CALLE COLIMA STA- 7.32.93 TO STA. 11.50.00 Q CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STD- DWG. NO. 2 JS 227- - 3 CALLE COLIMA STA. 11.50.00 70 STA. 23.00.00 O CCNSTRIICf JUNCTXN STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOW CONTROL Dt5TRIGY 2- STO. DWG. NO. 4 JS 229 CASE 1. 4 CALLE*COLIMA STA. 23.00.00 TO STA. 35.00.00 �'. CATCH BASIN 3 . CALLE COL I MA STA'.. 33.00.00 TO STA. 46.53.88 CURB FACE 6 _�'ATO1 6 92 AVENIDA BERMUDAS TO AVENIDA MARTINEZ CURB B GUTTER 7 ..CATCH BASINS B EISENHOWER DRIVE TO AVENIDA VALLEJO ••�•- FLOW LATERAL CONNECTIONS ' .'•.'.. •. 8 CATCH BASINS B AVENIDA RAMIREZ TO'AVENIDA RUBIO _ '. LATERAL CONNECTIONS '. E LATERAL '. •'••... ...'.••'..• '• LOCAL 9 CATCH 8ASP13 8 AVENIDA DIAZ TO AVENIDA'MONTEZUMA . . DEPRESSION LATERAL CONJECTICNS TYPICAL CATCH BASIN LATERAL LOCATION NO SCALE m A STORM PREPARED BY- CITY OF LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RIVERSIDE COUNTY.; CALIFORNIA PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRAIN IMP.ROVE'ME ASSESSMENT KICAK a ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS 41 -555 COOK STREET , SUITE 220 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 . TELEPHONE: (619) 341 -9544 .►--! J_ ,o _ q. JO EP KICAK . KC.E. 21773 DATE ,,y �pffSyn._ s as • of DISTRICT CITY, OFFICIALS MAYOR : JOHN J. PENA MAYOR PRO TEM :DALE BOHNENBE ;RGER COUNCILWOMEN':. JOYCE BOSWORTH COUNCILMEN: DR. WILLIAM RUSHWORTH COUNCILMEN: STANLEY SNIFF CITY CLERK , SAUNDRA JUHOLA CITY MANAGER : RONALD KIEDROWSKI DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /CITY ENGINEER FRANK R. REYNOLDS crnauaurrA PAn S•• Na `10052 NTS W 90- THIN w1af �m i VICMITY MAP o I Ltlii•�- �i�� .��UIIIIIlill111= €iflll��� .I I lllll I'llll!'ll!� �IIIL�II,IIUII�II ; ., -` TIIIIII�uIE[I[II: llli[IIl[IPIi[II .wlru�ir► <lom nnauliu I [I[If 111[1116 €11 • - • llllllll[LIIIS�MIr wiunuilu� ►• I[I�Itl�ll[I11' ' �.... 'lllll[U�ili 1 i VICMITY MAP 1 I— SINGING PALMS DF INDEX MAP �I 61Y of LA QUINTA Plan Sot No. 91 o3D. wl CAMEO DUNES I° PLACE W w ' SAND FLOWER PLACE PALM GARDEN PLACE T 2I w =I W y, 3 a o 3i GOLDEN SANDS PLACE y oo -]l AV�EMDA �L F( I I W it CALLS TAMPICO y ' I o`'S�1UMP a RA ( _ S —JI CALLE LES I 'fi� jl II i! DURANGO 11F.TnIT 11 II II I�yl II II I��� II II I� �I I J �W J ; SONORA wr 1\ rj IENSENADA r c R INOGALES N.T.S. W N W. M 0 a $ N a y LEGEND >. it w ji it a W ? a s s � a o a o v o7 > i> w S z �I SHEET INDEX NUMBER SHEET BOUNDARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY " —" - ....... STREET WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY of LR C UINTA -- - - -- STREET OUTSIDE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Plan Sot No. PREPARED-BY: KICAK B ASSOCIATES CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS CIVIL ENGINEERS STREET, STORM DRAIN a SANITARY SEWER 41 -555 COOK STREET, SUITE 220 IMPROVEMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT DI.STRI T 91-1 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 (619) 341 -9544 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Wi IV SHEET 2 OF 20 i t-- J 1 } I- U H Z v Q J 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. STREET, STORM DRAIN 81 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91 -1 N N.T.S. I I j III WII GII I I I I I I I I I I I ii II I X11 it �I I I oil �I I u 2 I I = II 3 I II LEGEND 1' W nnr�nnnr r r1ppnr1,I I N UEST R A SINALOA o t o21.�- $ - ASSESSMENT NUMBER IIDURANGO _.% - 0.24 AC._ ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 3 PARCEL ACREAGE SONORA TYPICAL PARCEL III 1� ENSENADA LA OUINTA CITY LIMIT CI I'Y of LA QUINTA Plan Set No. Qlo3o II � II III II WII Oil III It I I� II I I FILED IN H OFFICE OF HE CITY CLERK THIS / roY OF . c 19 '1/ CITY CLE K RECORDED IN THE OFF CE OIF THE SUPER INTEND OF STREETS THIS DAY OF 19- SUPER I NTE ND NT OF• 'SET S AN ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIEOi BY THE CITY COON ON THE LOTS PIECES AND tF ELS OF LAND SI ON WASTLEVIEDSONSTHET I��FSAID AE SE9� SAID ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM NO THE ASS�SSMEN WERE RECORDED IN THE OFOF THE SUPERII OF STREETS:OF SAID CITY HE! �4 DAY 01 19_21. REFERENCE IS MO THE ASSESSMRECORDED IN THE OFFICE E SUPERINTENDI STREETS FOR THE EXACT A OF EACH PARCI LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSET DIAGRAM. ?cz�tn «t CITY CLERK FILED THIS Mr DAY OF SvN 19 AT THF�kOUR OF /•00 0 _ d_,_ -.M. IN BOOK OF MAPS OF ASS T DISTRICTS, PAGES IN THE OF THE COUNTY ECORDER OF THE C ONRIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. FEE: NO: ; WILLIAM E. C NERLY COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY BY` DEPUTY 1 W nnnnpnnnnn nr>nn�l NOGALES LEGEND o i II I III I II II �I 11 II I I II II II II II o 0001_jI U ULIUULII W nnr�nnnr r r1ppnr1,I I 140.32 -LOT DIMENSION c 3 - -- -LOT NUMBER aIII f I II III . II III III 11 III UULJUULL000 j 'LJ I o t o21.�- $ - ASSESSMENT NUMBER Lju Finn nnr n I II II li II I _.% - 0.24 AC._ ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 3 PARCEL ACREAGE II I II II I I II I I II II I li it II II II I II II II TYPICAL PARCEL II I II II LA OUINTA CITY LIMIT m ' 0 0 z 9 0 3 0 +� w a 0 a - -- ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY STREET WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Q z, a z _ _ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Q m 3, S, Q g o a o v c > i> W i i> i \ I �) _) O � is,. �1 �fJ 3 J BOOK 34 OF MAPS RAGE 87 PROJECT N.T.S. -L -I TY of LA D3 BY: K I C AK 81 ASSOCIATES CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT D I A RAMS SHEET [PREPARED CIVIL ENGINEERS 41 -555 COOK STREET, SUITE 220 STREET, STORM DRAIN 81 SANITARY EWER PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 (619) 341 -9544 IMPROVEMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRI T 91-1 DP COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIF RNIA 20 0 INDEX WES DRIVE HO 'PAP u ' r CV1'Y of LA QUINTA Plan Sot No. • I q 1 o3D, AVENU ) i i i HUMMINGBIRD LANE I I � 9 O I (u I LL (f ;I it II I II II II II II li II II I II may® II II .1 i I I DURANGO 7'_%, L �_' - - rl I I I SONORA 1\ rig ..) r JENSENADA 5 Ir I I ON ------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- INOGALES N.T.S. CK W D O NN N O Q S Z Q C Q Q N m ' K J M1 Q W O Q K LEGEND cc a o -u s> w f w S SHEET INDEX NUMBER �— SHEET BOUNDARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY - - =—, STREET WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY of LA QUINTA -- - - -- STREET OUTSIDE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Plan Set No. IO ` PREPARED-BY: KICAK 81 ASSOCIATES CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS SHEET CIVIL ENGINEERS STREET, STORM DRAIN 8 SANITARY SEWER 2 41 -555 COOK STREET, SUITE 220 IMPROVEMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT •DI.STRI T 91 -1 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 (619) 341 -9544 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIF RNIA OF 20 Q I q�F I [—SINGING PALMS DRIVE I I a HIGHWAY III rI FiCAMEO DUNES PLACE it w 1 J. I � m SAND FLOWER I II PLACE PALM GARDEN PLACE —� z i I T W 3 s 3 QI o . 3i GOLDEN SANDS PLACE W o �t t LiJ I N w O C _' 11 1 CALLS TAMPICO ia 0 � I %3 < R� 000000 00 a aoaoa a oa ' W CALLE LES I I (u I LL (f ;I it II I II II II II II li II II I II may® II II .1 i I I DURANGO 7'_%, L �_' - - rl I I I SONORA 1\ rig ..) r JENSENADA 5 Ir I I ON ------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- INOGALES N.T.S. CK W D O NN N O Q S Z Q C Q Q N m ' K J M1 Q W O Q K LEGEND cc a o -u s> w f w S SHEET INDEX NUMBER �— SHEET BOUNDARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY - - =—, STREET WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY of LA QUINTA -- - - -- STREET OUTSIDE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Plan Set No. IO ` PREPARED-BY: KICAK 81 ASSOCIATES CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS SHEET CIVIL ENGINEERS STREET, STORM DRAIN 8 SANITARY SEWER 2 41 -555 COOK STREET, SUITE 220 IMPROVEMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT •DI.STRI T 91 -1 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 (619) 341 -9544 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIF RNIA OF 20 • .01 ... i . *I CITY- LA QUI-NTA - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RIVERSIDE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORM D IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91m-l. PREPARED BY, KICAK a ASSOCIATES olVIL ENGINEERS 41 -555 COOK STREET , SUITE 220 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE: (619) 341 -9544 . EPH KICAK . R.C.E. 21775 ' DATE wcffsHra4r ft um nm of CITY OFFICIALS MAYOR : JOHN J. PENA MAYOR PRO TEM DR. WILLIAM RUSHWORTH COUNCIL MEMBER DALE BOHNENBERGER COUNCIL MEMBER KRISTY FRANKLIN COUNCIL MEMBER STANLEY SNIFF CITY CLERK SAUNDRA JUHOLA CITY MANAGER : RONALD KIEDROWSKI DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /CITY ENGINEER FRANK R. REYNOLDS My Of to GURWA Plan Set No. 91031 iultl mo 18lIFi IIIII!1111111n1 II I'llll!IA!!n1. PROJECT llitll I[Irlltll .111111111[:11111 �l[UIf1111G11�11 LI[Itlltlitlll�[tl° �uuulaurcrllr L -- - �culuuu�ua ►. - Irllaullcnr�' �rlurt11�4r��° i VICIM1IITY MAP ! } H A` a �1 G r� �g r� n u X 4 f z s .s I A a x1 �I B o � e 8 ' 4 T 6 1 I y • • • I SEE SHEET 6 _1 SEE SHEET 5 I SEE SHEET 4 1 SEE SHEET .'3 ISEF SHEET 2' (MAINLINE) T` (MAINLINE) (MAINLINE) (MAINLINE) (MAINLINE) SEE SHEET 11 SEE SHEET 10 SEE SHEET 9 SEE SHEET 8 S SHEET 7 (LATERALS) ( LATEERALS) (LATERALS) (LATERALS) (LATERALS) 2' INDEX MAP SCALE 7'• 300' BASIN (TC) SCALE, 1 -300` INDEX OF SHEETS • QitONpi 1�T1p1 I' I CURB B GUTTER.,-;' PCAN'SHEET INDEX - GENERAL NOTES - CONSTRUCTION NOTES 2 STA. 0 +00.00 TO STA. 7+00.00 3 FLOW STA. 7.00.00 TO STA. 18.00.00 4 CALLE SONORA STA. 18,00.00 TO STA. 28-00.00 5 CALLE SONORA STA. 28.00.00 TO STA. 38.00.00 6 E LATERAL STA. 38.00.00 TO STA. 44 +62.43 7 LOCAL DEPRESSION . / 4S• S 45' LEGEND TYPICAL CATCH BASIN L AT ERAL LoC ATION S PROPOSED STORM DRAIN N. T. S. AVENIDA HERRERA TO AVENIDA CARRANZA —W —W— EXISTING VATER'LINE LATERAL CONNECTIONS AVENIDA OBRECON TO AVENIDA DIAZ —5— S — EXISTING SEWER LINE LATERAL CONNECTIONS AVENIDA JUAREZ TO AVENIDA CORTEZ —G— G — EXISTING GAS LINE —T—T— EXISTING G.T.E. CONDUIT EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT . PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER EEIICIDIARR . 1 {AIEYIp,� �y b° REVISIONS ca m s•ax.o aln Dlmmux �40>� SCALE, 1 -300` GENERAL NOTES YORK SHALL SE DOME IN ACCOROANCE WITH THESE PLANS. THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN IRE AGREEMENT. THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. LATEST - EDITION. AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS WULT 1884 EDITION). 2. NO CONSTRUCTION IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE PERMITS ISSUED By THE CITY OF LA DUINTA - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO ONSITE. OFFSITE AND ADJACENT UTILITIES. FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ANT AND ALL DAMAGES THAT MAY OCCUR FROM STORM WATER RUNOFF AND /OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM ANT AND ALL WORK. IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK AND SHALL MAINTAIN , ALL FACILITIES: COMPLETED AND UNCOMPLETED. UNTIL ACCEPTED ST THE CITY. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - LA OUINTA (618) 364 -2246. AT LEAST 46 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. I. THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOW IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK: ME AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR. ANT AND. ALL DAMAGES WICK MIGHT BE OCCASIONED 81 THIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANT AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) -800-422-4133 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 618- 388 -3834 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COWART 1- 800 - 422 -4133 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 618- 347 -8701 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 618 -388 -2631 PALMER CABLE VISION 61,8- 340 -1312 S. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SMALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT.. INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, THAT THIS REOUtREMENT SMALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS, AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND. INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER " -AMD'THE•ENGIMEER HARMLESS FROM.. ANY AND ALL LIABILITY. REAL OR ALLEGED. IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK OM THIS PROJECT. 'EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL PRESERVE EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DOME BY THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL A.C. PAVEMENT. CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER. CONCRETE'CROSS OTTER ETC.. WHICH HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR SAID RELACEMENT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL REPLACE VITM LIKE AND KIND ANY LANDSCAPING OR SPECIAL FEATURES SUCH AS TURF. GROUND COVER. TREES. BUSHES. IRRIGATION WITNSTHETCONSTRUCTION FORFTHISPROJECT. COST FORTWORK SMALL BEEINCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 12. ADJUSTMENT OF WATER VALVE COVERS AND MANHOLE COVERS SMALL TAKE PLACE AFTER PAVEMENT OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. AM 231. O2 CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. HN 252. 3 Q "CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT .. STANDARD. DRAWING NO. CO 1.00..6 LOCAL DEPRESSION NO. 2 STANDARD GRAVING NO., LO 201 (CASE -8). MODIFIED PER. DETAIL BELOW LEFT. O CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. 2 JS 227. OS CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD CRANING 90. 4 JS 228 (CASE 11. KICAK AND ASSOCIATES CITY OF LA OUINTA NO'" "Dacus APPROVED Bi MAW s.ata n• IF Iw tl -aaa Coos n• IF Y[ xxn ' U143T[l4aCx. ELLlf0allA axu, MAUI A3V - CA�If0A1• axsse ula na - USE nn, as - u« CITY NCINtER - R.C.E. 32740 OYEO BT . R•C.E. 21773 DATE ESIGNED BT . J_G DRAWN BY I '1- CHECKED BY . J•K• DATE Cm d LA CLNNTA PION OOt Ns 9103Y'. 1 . PLAN 'SHEET INDEX I SHEET OF I I t R ' s �AI 's1 Si t o-i a I I a, 7 rI f+ I .I I 1 i 5r I �i I I INDEX OF SHEETS >pAttT lq. QitONpi 1�T1p1 LIIIIT11 1 PCAN'SHEET INDEX - GENERAL NOTES - CONSTRUCTION NOTES 2 .. CALLE SONORA STA. 0 +00.00 TO STA. 7+00.00 3 CABLE SONORA STA. 7.00.00 TO STA. 18.00.00 4 CALLE SONORA STA. 18,00.00 TO STA. 28-00.00 5 CALLE SONORA STA. 28.00.00 TO STA. 38.00.00 6 CAVE SONORA STA. 38.00.00 TO STA. 44 +62.43 7 CATCH BASINS AND LATERAL CONNECTIONS AVENIDA BERMUDAS TO AVENIDA VILLA S CATCH BASINS AND LATERAL CONNECTIONS AVENIDA MENDOZA TO AVENI.OA VELASCO S CATCH BASINS AND LATERAL CONNECTIONS AVENIDA HERRERA TO AVENIDA CARRANZA 10 CATCH BASINS AND LATERAL CONNECTIONS AVENIDA OBRECON TO AVENIDA DIAZ 11 CATCH BASINS AND LATERAL CONNECTIONS AVENIDA JUAREZ TO AVENIDA CORTEZ GENERAL NOTES YORK SHALL SE DOME IN ACCOROANCE WITH THESE PLANS. THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN IRE AGREEMENT. THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. LATEST - EDITION. AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS WULT 1884 EDITION). 2. NO CONSTRUCTION IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE PERMITS ISSUED By THE CITY OF LA DUINTA - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO ONSITE. OFFSITE AND ADJACENT UTILITIES. FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ANT AND ALL DAMAGES THAT MAY OCCUR FROM STORM WATER RUNOFF AND /OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM ANT AND ALL WORK. IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK AND SHALL MAINTAIN , ALL FACILITIES: COMPLETED AND UNCOMPLETED. UNTIL ACCEPTED ST THE CITY. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - LA OUINTA (618) 364 -2246. AT LEAST 46 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. I. THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOW IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK: ME AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR. ANT AND. ALL DAMAGES WICK MIGHT BE OCCASIONED 81 THIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANT AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) -800-422-4133 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 618- 388 -3834 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COWART 1- 800 - 422 -4133 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 618- 347 -8701 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 618 -388 -2631 PALMER CABLE VISION 61,8- 340 -1312 S. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SMALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT.. INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, THAT THIS REOUtREMENT SMALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS, AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND. INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER " -AMD'THE•ENGIMEER HARMLESS FROM.. ANY AND ALL LIABILITY. REAL OR ALLEGED. IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK OM THIS PROJECT. 'EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL PRESERVE EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DOME BY THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL A.C. PAVEMENT. CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER. CONCRETE'CROSS OTTER ETC.. WHICH HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR SAID RELACEMENT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL REPLACE VITM LIKE AND KIND ANY LANDSCAPING OR SPECIAL FEATURES SUCH AS TURF. GROUND COVER. TREES. BUSHES. IRRIGATION WITNSTHETCONSTRUCTION FORFTHISPROJECT. COST FORTWORK SMALL BEEINCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 12. ADJUSTMENT OF WATER VALVE COVERS AND MANHOLE COVERS SMALL TAKE PLACE AFTER PAVEMENT OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. AM 231. O2 CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. HN 252. 3 Q "CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT .. STANDARD. DRAWING NO. CO 1.00..6 LOCAL DEPRESSION NO. 2 STANDARD GRAVING NO., LO 201 (CASE -8). MODIFIED PER. DETAIL BELOW LEFT. O CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. 2 JS 227. OS CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD CRANING 90. 4 JS 228 (CASE 11. KICAK AND ASSOCIATES CITY OF LA OUINTA NO'" "Dacus APPROVED Bi MAW s.ata n• IF Iw tl -aaa Coos n• IF Y[ xxn ' U143T[l4aCx. ELLlf0allA axu, MAUI A3V - CA�If0A1• axsse ula na - USE nn, as - u« CITY NCINtER - R.C.E. 32740 OYEO BT . R•C.E. 21773 DATE ESIGNED BT . J_G DRAWN BY I '1- CHECKED BY . J•K• DATE Cm d LA CLNNTA PION OOt Ns 9103Y'. 1 . PLAN 'SHEET INDEX I SHEET OF I I t R ' s �AI 's1 Si t o-i a I I a, 7 rI f+ I .I I 1 i 5r I �i I I CITY LA QUI'NTA. REDEVELOPMENT .AGENCY RIVERSIDE COUNTY , CALIFORNIA PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS W :* PREPARED BY- KICAK 81 ASSOCIATES CIV.I L ENGINEERS 41 -555 "COOK STREET , SUITE 220 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE: (619) 341 -9544 OSEPH KICAK , R.QE. 21775 DATE �_J0_LWLm CITY OFFICIALS .MAYOR : 'JOHN J. PENA MAYOR PRO TEM STANLEY SNIFF COUNCIL MEMBER GLENDA .BANGERTER COUNCIL MEMBER RONALD:.PERKINS COUNCIL MEMBER MICHAEL MCCAF2TNEY CITY CLERK SAUNDRA JUHOLA CITY MANAGER : .ROBERT L HUNT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /CITY ENGINEER FRANK R. REYNOLDS T '92� 1 CRY of LA QUINTA Plan Sgt � zo2'1 I e if _..1.�11111111l1��!�1' I i iiiii iriill'i �III[1111111111�l1 . 711111111111[11 €11: ' ' • • 11llitlll(I�If tll r :a116 llir ,I !1[1€1111111 (I[IttItllllllt[tl° cuul!laurcll�r - tfill Ana lrill uulr IV �lollaul!r► 't I I VICINITY MAP 11 a 8 E l 3 11 Y. r.: z • 4 • • J G y CATCH BASIN CURB 6 GUTT f LATERAL_ / ::• ,. i 45• q DETAIL "A" N.T.S. LEGEND —W —W— EXISTING WATER LINE —S —S— EXISTING SEWER LINE —G —G— EXISTING GAS LINE —T —T— EXISTING G. T. E. CONDUIT EXISTING STORM DRAIN — S� —Sr—P— EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER I1rORTIINT NOTICE SECTION-4216/4217 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REOUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A 'PERMIT TO EXCAVATE' VILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE 1 -800- 422 -4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG INDEX MAP SCALE, I =400 GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SMALL BE CONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS. THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT. THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC VORKS CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICAT IONS (JULY 1984 EDITION). 2. NO CONSTRUCTION IS AUTHORIZED. WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE PERMITS ISSUED BY THE CITY OF LA OUINTA - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TOONSITE. OFFSITE AND ADJACENT UTILITIES. FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES THAT MAY OCCUR FROM STORM WATER RUNOFF AND /OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM ANY AND ALL WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PLANS. 5. ALL FACT LITIES .SCOMPLETEDEANDNUNCOTPLETED LUNITL ACCCEPTEEDDLBY THEACITY. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - LA GUINTA (619) 777 -7000. AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 7: THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AW APPROXIMATE VAT ONLY.-THE CONTRACTOR SMALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILI -TIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORN. HE'ASREES TO-BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH HIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT N.S.A.) 1- 900 - 422 -4137 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 619- 798 -3854 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 1 -900- 422 -4137 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 1- 800 - 422 -4135 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 619- 798 -2631 PALMER CABLE VISION 619 -740 -1312 S. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SMALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTYN THAT THIS REOUIREMENT SMALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT'BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURSN AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SMALL DEFEND. INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY. REAL OR ALLEGED. IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. 9• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DONE 81 THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL REPLACE ALL A.C. PAVEMENT. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER ETC.. WHICH HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR SAID RELACEMENT SMALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF VORX. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL REPLACE WITH LIKE AND KIND ANY LANDSCAPING OR SPECIAL FEATURES SUCH AS TURF. GROUND COVER. TREES. BUSHES. IRRIGATION LINES. ETC- . ARE REMOVED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. COST FOR WORK SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK. 12. ADJUSTMENT OF WATER VALVE COVERS AND MANHOLE COVERS SHALL TAKE PLACE AFTER PAVEMENT OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED. - CONSTRUCTION NOTES: El •••••• CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. MH 231. EF•••CONSTRUCT MANHOLES PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. MH 232. '�•••••• CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. C8 100. 6 LOCAL DEPRESSION NA. 2 STANDARD DRAWING NO. LO 201 (CASE 8). MODIFIED PER DETAIL A• WHEN NECESSARY 4❑•••••• CONSTRUCT TRANSITION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. 1 IS 701. ❑S •••••• CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL � DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. 4 JS 229 (CASE 1). l .J•••••• CONSTRUCT SINGLE BOX CULVERT PER CALTRANS STANDARD DRAWING MD. 080 0712E SHOWN ON PLAN). 'E7 ---- •CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER RIVERSIDE. COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO C8 100, B LOCAL DEPRESSION NO 2 STANDARD DRAWING NO. LM 201 (CASE Cl. MODIFIED PER PROFILES SHOWN ON PLAN. ❑ -- -CONSTRUCT JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL . DISTRICT STANDARD DRAWING NO. 2 JS 227. CRY of IAAUINTA Plan Set No. 202 i Fg R 7 3 I y B i z - 35 4 i I 6 6 a G• • 0 • RE7 AWON BASIN MCT ffU51- _ CITY OF L4 QUANTA IA QLINT� CALIFOR)VY4 d t i, fMO aMAxMV `� MMh'ux ♦lck4m 1" L -LO nPrROVAIl L -LI Ci En ineer Date _Sit y of La Quinta^ d t i, fMO aMAxMV `� MMh'ux ♦lck4m 1" L -LO IRRIGATION PLAN L -LI IRRIGA110N DETAIL L -L2 IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS L -20 PLANTING PLAN L -21 PLANTING DETAIL AND SPE MWATIONS •+rtYYl tr Or. a01r q.e�r �1 +w 4tr�. wrrr� �pr`r `L Ol w�i.� e0r +rr..r rM Urri M•r.fr. Nrr�i�r\iy`�iw rasa r rr a...r ar..w y ar..� r..r. r.rrrr_r� a+..rrwr Ya.r•Yr\r rs a rrrr waam taaeteirne amn anr{al YmrmaYt• tr lr•. a.r rr�rw.rrrrrr.. rwr p.i.r.rrrra r.r rr arrr rr r rr rr.... r r r.r w Y rrirri �� Syr rra.r�.v •.r.rr rrrrr r r Yr. Y\r era rr r r rrr. r.•. r.rY r.r, r...a.yr r►Vr \rrar .r..ev•.r r•w.� Yra rarrae /rrM rr. ^r.i•r.r. CITY OF LA GUINTA LANDSCAPING GENERAL NOTES \� t N.on alu{p•FYmmneb�mro.h\er sermevt.e aar Cgala Oidm rr or i Sezmre spa�ar tr NOENena Canmueb. Wer aAE'at x rfr d,euoomWibnmro m.roaaaam a.. ,n.. w•+man m. �r a�.a�u Ueyrurawrxmr. w• ra :ov�w.mrn.rn•..a..etna,merYw.aa f 1 m•mneo.mamnmmmNOror.nrnmem araan aFOmamos n. mmactr we mwnrr om •vav balionar w:y unro eatr•mmrvq.o,. cmvaea l.nq ) mwmamr tr •w rm r danalm tmrm w w m.. minor m a•...• aw marmmm req. W1{tlrDmWr S'.rir u.n room. Pr(n malc{crt�ee.xx {ill . Tn. mmxnrma.aaomwm trey mmo.K ny.mm•nmtra.,,ar.yrro�.. r.n:,x rtl ear• aipm ' s iim aowacb raxmmm• emr+ ara .w a..mrm >erre m.+a ro.em ur piro,anaa mry mmeuceon'Ratwraim tneranm rae aih'e.wberirwatoaa. a t.m amvgwa ' m�+Yr+rM aulem mminr a.l.pyr. e me m•o-m rr may or cb bv�a.n umaomae mm, am.mmnrnma..r M•�a ' mw.smn nr..mra..+o•am. r ns�a sasar. r. Tlr m,••®nue om.m..mm.Qa rs.e:....ramm mina om mina ro••rme. om•'\mm b.e•mm.avm/ aaotmM •+e aai u. p•d� ilw rre \n w eme•n r.rc. m•+.an r aiera.e aommr mw ow:m.•anamb amrm, - e cam�m. mvmw ma me' viu. a ..aaa:pn.+.amwinr..►ai..�maprcT r.r dmmmra omr m+gor m.r w� omer> oc ,mayor lR etrmn -FM. ).m •.a -S:mFm sr.a,x e:ma.. -Pinyin Yarime•pmnmr ]q Yamay -FeHax e:m wrt •r:m yin smamy 6110am -e'.m pm Nba tNa• 4 Pa.G6t aw em•a Svm•r a Farr Nafaq. 0. N rm• arw .em. ONE �on•a,•ax. pine d afgee M m.bna.c• .a. er Titrana un•mi a TMkCamaa bronaymmn {Yaiibn•ie NOel � {KUSC1p� `�yv P� tuvxn �9n t•w "...w � 4 air . ..r w a.... ! .. .. CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES II.wdscVe Architect. MS Sams v S1REUr SAN BERNARDM CA IM RJr.Cmrl 6t8) 3�EDU1 CITY aflAauwrA wort sa No. tp�� a n� R.T.CV GlL4M CDAIP7uVJ! MM GOMM L-W= S&W4 &utv 201 Dace Point G 92629 (710 661-3-M FAX (714) 6615169 a Qeld®ia Rag6vvd= 2432 L- . . C s� d �i � LA -s .\3 rz-N (r)PV1C cN CAO 0Q-- Ye� C 4LL OF:� -'t) ` 3E- (P P07 ? CaileTampico CB # Photo # Size Side of Street _ Location Condition 1 1 4' North ' 25' West of Washington and Calle Tam ico minor debris/good 2 2 4' North 22' of Seasons at Calle Tampico some trash and good/ good 3 4 T North 175' East of Avenida Bermudas on Calle Tampico lots of trash and poor/ poor 4 5 T South 105' East of Eisenhower on Calle Tampico minor good/ good 5 7 T South 0' West of Avenida Mendoza on Calle Tampico minor good/ good 6 8 T I South 0' West of Avenida Villa on Calle Tampico some fair /fair 7 9 T South 2' West of Avenida Navarro on Calle Tampico good-little 8 10 T South 155' East of Avenida Bermudas on Calle Tampico fair /some cracking and debris 9 12 1 T I South 640' East of Desert Club on.Calie Tampico minor good/ good 10 13 4' South 2' West of Washington on Calle Tampico minor good/ pod venida Bermuda CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 11 15 T West. 2' South of Ave.52 on Avenida Bermudas Good/lots of debris and trash 12 14 18' West 20' South of Calle Sonora on Avenida Bermudas Good/some debris 13 16 14' 1 West 3' South of Calle Nogales on Avenida Bermudas Fair /some trash and debris 14 17 14' West 5' South of Calle Colima on Avenida Bermudas Good/some trash and debris 15 19 14' West 2' South of Calle Madrid on Avenida Bermudas Fair/little debris 16 20 14' East JAcross from Calle Madrid on Avenida Bermudas Fair /debris and broken bar 17 22 14' East lAcross from Calle Colima on Avenida Bermudas Fair /minor cracking on to 18 24 16 East lAcross from Calle Nogales on Avenida Bermudas Good/minor debris 19 26 16' East lAcross from Calle Sonora on Avenida Bermudas Good/minor trash Avenida Navarro CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 20 27 1T West 31' South of Sonora on Avenida Navarro Fair /minor cracking 21 29 15' West 22' South of Nogales on Avenida Navarro Fair /minor cracking 22 30 10' 1 East 30' South of Sonora on Avenida Navarro Fair /minor cracking 23 31 16' East 20' South of Nogales on Avenida Navarro Fair /minor cracking 24 14' West 8' South of Colima on Avenida Navarro Fair /minor cracking 25 14' r East 8' South of Colima on Avenida Navarro Fair /minor cracking �3N3 C"4;- Qulm(/40 • • Avenida Villa CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of.Street Location Condition . 26 34 21' East 30' South of Colima on Avenida Villa Fair /minor cracking 27 35 17' West 45' South of Colima on Avenida Villa good/very minor cracking 28 36 115.5'1 East 39' South of Nogales on Avenida Villa good/minor cracks 29 37 1 16' West 34' south of Nogales on Avenida'Villa Fair/cracking 30 38 10' East 34' South of Sonora on Avenida Villa Fair/cracking 31 39 18' West 34' South of Sonora on Avenida Villa Fair/cracking venida Mendoz CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 32 40 17.5' West 31' South of Sonora on Avenida Mendoza good/minor cracking 33 41 10' East 31' South of Sonora on Avenida Mendoza good/minor cracking 34 43 16' West 3T South of Nogales on Avenida Mendoza poor/cracking and broken bar 35 44 15' East 3T South of Nogales on Avenida Mendoza Fair/cracking 36 45 21' West 13' South of Colima on Avenida Mendoza good/minor cracking 37 46 21' East 26' South of Colima on Avenida Mendoza good Avenida Martinez CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 38 47 1T West 38' south of Sonora on Martinez Good/ little trash 39 48 10' East 28' south of Sonora on Martinez Good/little debris 40 49 16' 1 West 32' south of Nogales on Martinez Fair /minor cracking 41 50 16' 1 East 32' south of Nogales on Martinez Fair /minor cracking 42 51 21' 1 West 135' south of Colima on Martinez Fair /minor cracking 43 52 21' East 30' south of Colima on Martinez Fair /minor cracking 44 54 14' .West 32' south of Madrid on Martinez Good /minor debris 45 55 14' East 32' south of Madrid on Martinez Good /minor debris to 0 0 0 isenhower Driv CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 46 56 14' East 54' south of Madrid on Eisenhower Poor /trees inside 47 57 14' West 54' south of Madrid on Eisenhower Poor /trees inside 48 59 21' East 18' south of Colima on Eisenhower Poorlbig crack 49 60 21' West 3T south of Colima on Eisenhower Fair /minor cracking and debris 50 61 16' East 2' south of Nogales on Eisenhower Fair /minor cracking and debris 51 62 16' West 5' south of Nogales on Eisenhower Fair/cracking 52 63 12' East 62 'south of Sonora on Eisenhower ' Fair /minor cracking 53 64 21' West 10' south of Sonora on Eisenhower Good/some debris 54 66 T East 2' south of Sinaloa on Eisenhower Good/starting to crack and some debris 55 67 7' West 2' south of Sinaloa on Eisenhower Good/starting to crack and some debris 56 89 T West 0' south of Tampico on Eisenhower Good/some debris Avenida Velasco CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 57 68 T North end of cul -de -sac north end of Velasco Good/some debris 58 69 18' West 32' south of Sonora on Velasco Fair /minor cracking 59 70 8' East 24' south of Sonora on Velasco Fair /minor cracking 60 71 16' West 32' south of Nogales on Velasco Fair /minor cracking 61 72 16' East 32' south of Nogales on Velasco Fair /minor cracking 62 73 21' West 10' south of Colima on Velasco Fair /minor cracking 63 74 21' East 33' south of Colima on Velasco Fair /minor cracking 64 75 21' West 35' south of Madrid on Velasco Good/ little trash 65 76 21' East 35' south of Madrid on Velasco Good/ little trash Avenida Herrera CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 66 77 21' East 32' south of Madrid on Herrera Good 67 78 21' West 35' south of Madrid on Herrera Poor /trees growing 68 79 19' East 32' south of Colima on Herrera Fair /some cracking and trash 69 80 21' West 10' south of Colima on Herrera Fair /some cracking 70 81 16' East 20' south of Nogales on Herrera Fair /some cracking 71 82 15' West 36' south of Nogales on Herrera Fair /some cracking 72 83 8 East 30' south of Sonora on Herrera Good/some trash Z2 21' West 30' south of Sonora on Herrera Fair /some cracking 74 85 T North End of cul -0e -sac on north end of Herrera Fair /debris • • • Avenida Vallejo CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 75 86 T North End of cul-de -sac at north end of Vallejo Good 76 87 21' West 95' south of Sonora on Vallejo Fair /some cracking and debris 77 88 8' East 21' south of Sonora on Vallejo Fair /some cracking 78 90 16' West 31' south of Nogales on Vallejo Good/few cracks 79 91 16' East 32'south of Nogales on Vallejo Poor /objects in the way 80 92 21' West 2' south of Colima on Vallejo Fair/cracking and debris 81 93 1 21' East 2' south of Colima on Vallejo Fair/cracking and debris 82 94 1 21' West 70' south of Madrid on Vallejo Good/some debris 83 95 1 21' East 80' south of Madrid on Vallejo Fair/cracking Avenida Ramirez CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 84 96 21' East 38' south of Madrid on Ramirez Fair /some cracking 85 97 21' West 35' south of Madrid on Ramirez Good /few cracks 86 98 21' East 10' south of Colima on Ramirez Fair /some cracking and debris 87 99 21' West 30' south of Colima on Ramirez Fair /some cracking and debris 88 100 16' East 32' south of Nogales on Ramirez Good/some cracking and debris 89 101 16' West 31' south of Nogales on Ramirez Good/few cracks 90 102 8' East 30' south of Sonora on Ramirez Poortbar Is missing some cracking 91 103 21' West 30' south of Sonora on Ramirez Poor /bar is broken 92 104 B. North end of Ramirez on the north end FalMots of debris venida Carranz< CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 93 105 8' North End of Carranza on the north end Good/litUe debris 94 106 21' West 38' south of Sonora on Carranza Fair /some cracking 95 107 9' East 45' south of Sonora on Carranza Poorilots of cracking 96 108 18' West 32' south of Nogales on Carranza Fair /some cracking and debris 97 109 18' East 32' south of Nogales on Carranza Fair /some cracking and debris 98 110 21' West 2' south of Colima on Carranza Good/litUe debris and little cracks 99 111 21' East 20' south of Colima on Carranza Poor/big cracks 100 112 21' West 36' south of Madrid on Carranza Good/few cracks 101 113 21' East 30' south of Madrid on Carranza Fair /some cracking and trash Avenida Obrego CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 102 114 21' East 2' south of Madrid on Obre on Fair /some cracking and debris 103 115 20' West 35' south of Madrid on Obre on PoorAots of cracking 104 116 21' East 68' south of Colima on Obre on Fair /some cracking 105 117 14 West 24' south of Colima on Obre on Fair /some debris 106 118 18' East 32' south of Nogales on Obre on Poor /major cracking 107 119 18' West 30' south of Nogales on Obre on Fair /some cracking 108 120 12' East 32' south of Sonora on Obre on Fair/lots of debris and trash 109 121 21' West 32' south of Sonora on Obre on Good/little trash 110 122 T East 8T south of Alvarado on Obre on Good/some debris 111 123 T I West 8T south of Alvarado on Obre on Good/some debris 116 128 8' 1 North End of Obre on at North end Poor /trees growing inside Avenida Alvarad CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 112 124 21' West 32' south of Sonora on Alvarado Good/few cracks 113 125 12' East 30' south of Sonora on Alvarado Good/little debris 114 126 18' West' 15' south of Nogales on Alvarado Poor /covered in debris and big piece missing 115 127 18' East 32' south of Nogales on Alvarado Good/some debris 117 129 21' West 73' south of Colima on Alvarado Good /some debris 118 130 21' 1 East 5' south of Colima on Alvarado Fair /some cracking 119 131 1 21' West 1T south of Madrid on Alvarado Good/little debris 120 132 21' East 4T south of Madrid on Alvarado Good Avenida Rubio CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 121 133 21' East 40' south of Madrid on Rubio Good /few cracks 122 134 18' ' West 35' south on Madrid on Rubio Fair /some cracks 123 135 21' East 65' south of Colima on Rubio Good/few cracks 124 136 21' West 70' south of Colima on Rubio Good/few cracks 125 137 18' East 65' south of Nogales on Rubio Fair /some cracks 126 138 18' West 32' south of Nogales on Rubio Fair /some cracks 127 139 12' East 30' south of Sonora on Rubio Good/some debris 128 140 25' West 5' south of Sonora on Rubio Fair /some cracks and debris 0 0 0 Avenida Diaz CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location 12T Condition 129 141 25' West 40' south of Sonora on Diaz Good/some debris 130 142 12' East south of Sonora on Diaz Good /some debris 131 143 18' West 65' south of Nogales on Diaz Fair /some cracking 132 144 18' East 30' south of Nogales on Diaz Fair /some cracking 133 145 21' West 10' south of Colima on Diaz Good/some debris 134 146 21' East 10' south of Colima on Diaz Faidsomecracking and debris 135 1 147 1 21' West 35' south of Madrid on Diaz Fair /some cracking 136 148 1 21' East 105' south of Madrid on Diaz Fair /some cracking and debris Avenida Juarez CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 137 149 21' East 30' south of Madrid on Juarez Good /few cracks and debris 138 150 21' West 30' south of Madrid on Juarez Good/few cracks 139 151 21' East 30' south of Colima on Juarez Good /few cracks and debris 140 152 21' West 30' south of Colima on Juarez Good/few cracks and debris 141 153 11' East 30' south of Sonora on Juarez Poor /major cracking 142 154 21' West 35' south of Sonora on Juarez Good /few cracks and trash Avenida Madero CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition 143 155 21' West 30' south of Sonora on Madero Good/some debris 144 156 10' East 35' south of Sonora on Madero Fair/lots of debris 145 157 21' West 30' south of Colima on Madero Good /few cracks and debris 146 158 21' 1 East 60' south of Colima on Madero Fair /some cracking 147 159 14' 1 West 25' south of Madrid on Madero Good/some debris 148 160 14' East 60' south of Madrid on Madero Fair/lip is cracked Avenida Cortez CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 149 161 19' West 34' south of Colima on Cortez Fair /some cracking 150 162 21' East 33' south of Colima on Cortez Poor /major cracking s • s enida Montezun CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 151 163 10' East 3' south of Madrid on Montezuma Fair/lots of debris 152 164 10' West V south of Madrid on Montezuma Fair /some cracking 153 165 8' East 3' south of Colima on Montezuma Good/some debris 154 166 10' West 0' south of Colima on Montezuma Good/some debris 155 167 23' East 3' south of Nogales on Montezuma Poor /major cracking 156 168 25' West 0' south of Nogales on Montezuma Good /some debris 157 1 169 1 10' South 2' west of Alverado on Montezuma Good/few cracks 158 170 1 8' South 0' west of Carranza on Montezuma Good /some debris 159 171 12' South 5' west of Herrera on Montezuma Good /some debris 160 172 12' North 5' west of Herrera on Montezuma FairAots of debris 161 173 12' South 22' west of Velasco on Montezuma Good /few cracks 162 174 12' North 22' west of Velasco on Montezuma PoorBots of debris Calle Tecate No catch basins Calle Potrero No catch basins Calle Temecula No catch basins Calle Madrid CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 163 175 14' South 0' west of Bermudas on Madrid Fair /some cracking Calle Chillon No catch basins Calle Arroba No catch basins Calle Colima No catch basins Calle Montere No catch basins Calle Chihuahua No catch basins Calle Nogales CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 164 176 9' South 0' west of Bermudas on Nogales Good/few cracks Avenida Morales No catch basins Calle Ensanada No catch basins Calle Sonora CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 165 177 14' South 0' west of Bermudas on Sonora Fair /some cracking 166 179 18' South 2' west of Eisenhower on Sonora Good/some debris 167 178 21' South East of Montezuma on Sonora Good /some debris Calle Durango No catch basins Calle Sinaloa CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 168 180 14' South East of Cortez on Sinoloa FairAots of debris 169 181 T South 0' west of Juarez on Sinaloa Good /few cracks 170 182 14' South 2' west of Diaz on Sinaloa FairAots of debris 171 183 14' South 2' west of Obre on on Sinaloa FairAots of debris and cracks 172 184 14' South 2' west of Ramirez on Sinaloa Fair /some debris and cracking 173 185 14' South T west of Herrera on Sinaloa PoorAots of cracking 1741 186 1 10' South 2' west of Eisenhower on Sinaloa Good /some debris 175 187 T I South 0' west of Mendoza on Sinaloa PoorAots of debris and trash 176 188 12' South 0' west of Navarro on Sinaloa Fair /some debris and trash 177 189 7' South 2' west of Bermudas on Sinaloa Fair /some trash and debris 178 190 T South 0' East of Bermudas on Sinaloa Good/some debris Ave. 52 CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 179 191 4' South 175' East of Desert Club on Ave. 52 Good/some debris 180 192 3' South 280' west of Washington on Ave. 52 FairAots of debris and trash 181 193 3' South 5' west of Washington on Ave.52 Good/some debris 182 194 4' North 250' west of Washington on Ave. 52 Poor /lots of cracking 183 195 4' North 135' East of desert Club on Ave. 52 Poor /lots of Debris Calle Barcelona CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Hidalgo CB # Photo # Size Sid -ride —of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Cadiz CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Fortuna CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Guatemala CB # Photo # Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins venida La Fond CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 184 196 4' North 70' west of Washington on La Fonda Fair /some cracking and debris 185 197 4' South 55' east of Jacumba on la Fonda Good/some debris 186 198 10' North Perpendicular from cb#199 on La Fonda Fair /some cracking and debris 187 199 10' South 0' east of Guatemala on La Fonda Fair /some debris 188 200 4' North 157' west of Main Street on La Fonda Very Poor/standing water nothing is flowin Main Street CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Hueneme CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins • • s Calle Iloilo CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Jacumba CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Kalima of Street Location Condition I nSide North End of Kalima at the north end PooMots of debris Calle Nuestra CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Amigo CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Obispo CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Paloma CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Paloma Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Quito CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins • s • Calle Rondo CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 190 202 4' West T south of Torres on Rondo Good/some debris 191 203 4' West 60' north of La Jarita on Rondo Poor/lots of cracking and debris 194 206 4' West 5' south of La Fonda on Rondo Fair/lots of debris and trash Avenida Nuestra CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 192 204 4' North 62' west of Rondo on Nuestra Good/some debris 193 205 4' South 62' west of Rondo on Nuestra Good/some debris %venida La Fond; CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Tamazula CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins %venicla La Torre CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Avenida La Jarit CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Avenida Naranja CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Avenida Tujunga CB # Photo *I Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Avenida Ultimo CB # Photo #1 Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Sagebrush Ave. CB 9l PhotuOl Size *03T Location Condition 195 207 10' 3T east of Washington on Sa ebrush Poor /some debris and cracking 196 208 10' east of Washington on Sagebrush PoorAots of debris Date Palm Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 197 209 T South south end of Date Palm Dr. Good/some debris Saguaro Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 198 210 4' North 1000' west of Date Palm on Saguaro Good /some debris 199 211 4' South 1 000' west of Date Palm on Saguaro Good /some debris Bottlebrush CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition 200 212 T North 1000' west of Date Palm on Bottlebrush Good/some debris 201 213 T South 1000' west of Date Palm on Bottlebrush Good/some debris Paradise Way CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 202 214 21' West 0' south of Springtime on Paradise Good/some debris 203 215 21' East T south of Springtime on Paradise Good/some debris and trash Springtime Way CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Summertime Wad CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 204 216 4' East 53' south of Wintercove on Summertime Good/some debris 205 217 4' West Perpendicular from Cb# 204 on Summertime Good/some debris 206 218 4' East 50' south of Desertfall on Summertime Good /same debris 207 219 4' West lPerpendicular from Cb# 206 on Summertime Good/few cracks Cloudview CB # Phulu #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 208 220 4' East 150' north of Desertfall on Cloudview Good /some debris 209 221 4' West Perpendicular from Cb# 208 on Cloudview Good /same debris Desert Fall Way CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins inter Cove Cou CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Seasons Way CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Park Ave. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 210 222 9' West 700' North of Tampico on Park Ave. Fair /some debris an cracking 211 223 4' East Perpendicular to CB# 210 on Park Ave. Fair /some debris an cracking Dry Creek CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 212 224 4' South 194' West of Park on Dry Creek Good/some debris 213 225 4' North 206' West of Park on Dry Creek Fair/cracking and debris River Rock CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Caleo Bay CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 214 226 5' West South of Ave. 47 on Caleo Bay Good /some trash and debris 215 227 5' West Perpendicular to west end of Via Florence on Caleo Bay Fair/cracking and debris 216 228 4' East Perpendicular to east end of Lake La Quinta on Caleo Bay Fair/cracking and debris C 9 • s ake CB # Side of Street Location Condition 217 T North 5' west of Caleo Bay on Lake La Quinta Good/some trash 218 South 5' west of Caleo Bay on Lake La Quinta Good/some trash Via Florence CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 219 231 4' South 5' east of Caleo Bay on Via Florence Good/some debris 220 232 4' North 5' east of Caleo Bay on Via Florence Good/some debris Washington St. CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 221 233 4' West 500' South of Highland Palms Dr. on Washington St. Poor /no water flowing Highland Palms CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Crest View Ter. CB # Photo #1 Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Sand Flower PI. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Cameo Dunes PI CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Singing Palms D CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Palm Garden PI. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Golden Sands PI to # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins T Cameo Palms Dr CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins P'A Coldbrook CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 222 234 14' South Perpendicular to Wakefield on Coldbrook Good/little debris Sunbrook CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No catch Basins Wake Field Circl CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 223 235 20' South 300' south of Coldbrook on Wakefield Fair/cracking and debris 224 236 15' North 300' south of Coldbrook on Wakefeild Fair/cracking and debris Rockberry Ct. CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Bayberry Ln. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Deerbrook CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 228 240 1' North Perpendicular with Stonebrook Poor /covered in debris Ashwood Court CB At Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins a • Stonebrook Cour CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 225 237 14' East 5' south of Deerbrook on Stonebrook Good/some debris 226 238 14' West 5' south of Deerbrook on Stonebrook Good/some debris 227 239 18 South South end of Stonebrook. Good/few cracks and debris irtch Crest Circl CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Parkbrook Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Sunberry Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition . No Catch Basins Summerbrook CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins pringbrook Cow CB # Photo #1 Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins amblewood Cou CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location - Condition No Catch Basins Bridgette Way CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 229 241 14' West 2' north of Victoria on Brid ette Good/some debris 230 242 14' West 2' north of Desert Stream on Brid ette Good /some debris 231 243 20' East north of Desert Stream on Brid ette Good /some debris 1 12' r 0 9 11 • Desert Stream D CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 232 244 12' South 10' East of Brid ette on Desert Stream Good/little debris 233. 245 20' North Perpendicular to CBS 232 on Desert Stream Goodnittle debris 234 246 14' North 14' west of Desert Fox on Desert Stream Good/little debris 235 247 14' North 2' east of Desert Fox on Desert Stream Good/little debris 236 248 14' North 2' west of Desert Eagle on Desert Stream Good/little debris 237 249 14' South Perpendicular to CBS 236 on Desert Stream Good/little debris Ashley Place CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Desert Air CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 238 250 12' West 3' north of Desert Storm on Desert Air Good /some debris 239 251 12' East 3' north of Desert Storm on Desert Air Fair /some cracking esert Wind Cow CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins I Desert Crest Dr. CBS Photo # Size Side o Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Desert Hills Cour CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Desert Fox Dr. CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins esert Rock Cow CBS Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Desert Sand Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins esert View Cou CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins esert Eagle Cou CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Los Manos Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side o Street Location Condition 240 252 14' East Perpendicular to CB# 241 on Los Manos Fair/cracking 241 253 25' West 30' North of Miles Ave. on Los Manos Good/some debris Fronterra Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Ladera Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Ocotillo Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 242 254 21' North North end of Ocotillo Fair/lots of debris Canterra Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Pala Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins a � s Milago Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Arbola Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Camino Rosada CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition 243 255 12' West Perpendicular to CB# 244 on Rosada Fair /debris and Cracking 244 256 4' 1 East 5' south of Azul Rosada Fair /debris and Cracking Camino Azul CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Camino Del Oro CB # Photo #1 Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Camino Lavanda CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 245 264 17' North Northend of Lavanda Poor /full of debris and trashed and cracked amino La Crest. CBRI Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Latigo Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Tortola Cr. T—B#1 Photo #1 Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Malia Cr. CB #1 Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Nuevo Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 246 257 21' South East of Vista Verde on Nuevo Good/some debris 247 258 21' North Perpendicular to CB# 246 on Nuevo Good Star Flower CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 248 259 10' East East end of Star Flower Fair/cracking and debris alle Santa Barbr CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Palmeto CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 249 260 14' North Perpendicular to CB# 250 on Palmeto Fair /some cracking and debris 250 261 14' South T west of Santa Barbara on Palmeto Good/some trash Calle Placito CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 251 262 T West South end of Placito Good/some debris 252 263 7' East V north of sonrisa on Placito Good/some debris Calle Sonrisa CB # Photo #1 Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Prospero CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 253 265 14' South Perpendicular to CB# 264 on Pros ero Good/some debris 254 266 14' North 220' from Palmeto on Pros ero Fair /lots of debris • .01 61 Marguerite Court CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 71 1 No Catch Basins Saffron Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Verbena Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 255 267 10' West 2' south of Dandelion on Verbena Good/some debris 256 268 10' East 2' south of Dandelion on Verbena Fair/lips cracked and debris Dandelion Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins orning Glory Co CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 257 269 1 4' West west end of Morning Glory Good/some debris Blazing Star Tr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Dalea Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Marigold Ln. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Buttercup Ln. CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition 258 270 10' South 2' east of Foxtail on Buttercup Good/few cracks 259 271 21' North 0' east of Foxtail on Buttercup Good/some debris 0 0 Foxtail Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Goldenrod Circl CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Sweet Bush Ln. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Mariposa Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calico Circle CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Willow Circle CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Iris Court # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition f 26B 0 272 4' East ' East end of Iris FairAots of debris No Harland Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 261 273 10' East 252' north of Miles on No Harland Fair/cracking and lots of debris 262 274 10' West 35' north of Nolan on No Harland Fair/cracking and lots of debris 263 275 2T East 380' north of Miles on No Harland Fair/cracking and debris 264 276 2T West 5' south of Lowe on No Harland Poor/lots of cracking and some debris Forbes Circle CB # Photo #1 Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins • West Harland Dr. CB # Photo 91 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Las Vistas Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Seeley Dr. CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Alden Circle CB # Photo # Stze Side o Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Bradford Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Lowe Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 265 277 27' South 90' west of No Harland Poor /severe cracking 266 278 2T North 90' west of No Hariand PooMots of cracking Irwin Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Carnes Circle CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No catch Basins Via Corondo CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins 0. 0 0 0 01 0 Tiara Place CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Carman Place CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Sonesta Way CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins La Palma Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 267 279 2T South 215' west of Adams on La Palma Good/some debris 268 280 2T North 215' west of Adams on La Palma Good/some debris Nolan Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Venice Dr. CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Salerno Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins I Parma Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Palermo Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins 0 0 0 Genoa Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 269 281 1 14' West 5' south of Torino on Genoa Fair /some cracking and debris Torino Dr. CB #1 Photo # I Size Side of Street Location Condition 270 282 35 North 20' west of Genoa on Torino Fair /crackin 271 283 22' South 5' west of Genoa on Torino Good/some debris Messina Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Verona Court CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Alba Court CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Milan Court CB # Photo # I Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Naples Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Rome Dr. CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Palm Royale Dr. CB #1 Photo #1 Sizel Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins • • Pompeii Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins San Marino Courl CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Como Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Siena Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Adams Street CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 272 264 12' West Perpendicular to Westward Ho on Adams Good/some debris 273 285 1' West 105' north of Wal -Marts Northern most driveway on Adams Fair/lots of debris 274 286 T West 345' north of Via Grazianna on Adams Good Few cracks 275 287 4' East 510' north of Ave. 48 on Adams Good/few cracks 276 288 21' East 1010' North of Ave. 48 on Adams Good /some debris 277 289 3' East 1056' south of Westward Ho on Adams Poor/clogged 278 1 290 5' East 265' south of La Palma on Adams Good/some debristbar? 279 291 4' East Perpendicular with CB# 280 on Adams Fair/lots of debris 280 292 4' 1 West 3' south of Star light on Adams Poor/clogged Dune Palms Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 281 293 14' West 125' south of Nuevo on Dune Palms Poor/bar is missing 282 294 4' West 35' south of Desert Streams on Dune Palms Good/some debris 283 295 T West 0' south of Westward Ho on Dune Palms Good/some debris 284 296 10' East 1210' south of 111 on Dune Palms Good/some debris 285 297 10' 1 East 700' south of Miles on Dune Palms Good /some debris 286 298 10' East 275' north of Miles on Dune Palms Good/some debris 287 299 4' East 130' south of Nuevo on Dune Palms Good/some debris 288 300 24' East 30' south of Nuevo on Dune Palms Fair/lots of debris and trash so • • Jefferson St. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 289 301 T West 5' south of 111 on Jefferson Fair/lots of debris 290 302 6' West 30' North of Ave. 48 on Jefferson Fair/lots of debris 291 303 6' West 2' South of Ave. 48 on Jefferson Good/some debris 292 304 4' West 100' north of Ave. 49 on Jefferson Poor /man hole cover gone/cracking 293 305 4' West 0' north of Ave. 50 on Jefferson FairAots of debris 294 306 14' West 600' north of Pomelo on Jefferson Good/some debris 295 307 1 T West 210' north of Pomelo Good/very little cracking 296 308 4' West 30' south of Pomelo on Jefferson Poor/cracking and debris 297 309 4' West 1056' north of Ave. 52 on Jefferson Poor/cracking and debris 298 310 T East 1500' north of Ave.57 on Jefferson Good/some debris 299 311 T East 40' south of Pomelo on Jefferson Good/some debris 300 312 T East 190' north of Pomelo on Jefferson Good/some debris 301 313 4' East 150' south of Ave. 50 on Jefferson Good/some debris 302 314 T East 5' south of 111 on Jefferson Good/some debris 303 315 T East 230' north of Ave. 59 on Jefferson Poor/clogged 304 316 T East 75' north of Corsica Gate on Jefferson PoorAots of debris Madison St. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 305 317 28' West 2' north of Weisko t on Madison Good/little debris 306 318 14' East 2' north of Ave. 58 on Madison Good/little debris 307 319 14' East 1200' north of Ave.. 58 on Madison Good/litde debris 308 320 21' East 2640' north of Ave. 58 on Madison PoorAots of debris and trash 309 321 21' East 2' north of Airport on Madison Fair/lots of debris Airport Blvd. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 310 322 4' South 1060' west of Monroe on Airport Fair /some trash and debris 311 323 21' South 2112' east of Madison on Airport FairAots of debris Ave. 58 CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 312 324 4' North 30' east of Madison on Ave. 58 Good/some debris Ave. 54 CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins 0 Monroe Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side o Street Location Condition 313 325 4' West north of Airport on Monroe Fair /front bar bent Simon Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Auto Center Wa CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 314 326 4' East 30' north of Auto Center Dr. on Auto Center Way Fair/cracking and debris 315 327 4' 1 West 30' north of Auto Center Dr. on Auto Center Way Good /some debris Auto Center Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins La Quinta Dr. CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Washington CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 316 328 21' West 675' north of Channel Dr. on Washington Fair/lots of debris 317 329 21' West 4' north of 111 on Washington Good/some debris 318 330 21' West 310' south of 11 on Washington Fair /some cracking and debris 319 331 4' West 880' south of Ave. 47 on Washington Poor/lots of debris 320 332 6' West 1435' south of Ave. 47 on Washington Fair /minor cracking and debris 321 334 4' West 948' north of Ave. 48 on Washington Good /few cracks 322 335 1 4' West 578' north of Ave. 48 Washington Good/few cracks 323 333 4' West 1120' north of Eisenhower Good/some debris 324 336 4' West 5' north of Ave. 50 on Washington Fair /lots of debris 325 337 4' West 100' south of Ave. 50 on Washington Fair/lots of trash and debris 326 338 4' East 100' south of Ave. 50 on Washington Good/some debris 327 339 4' East 300' south of Via Bolero Poor /lots of debris 328 340 5' East 15' north of Via Bolero Poor/clogged Cracking 329 341 4' East 910' south of Eisenhower on Washington Good/some debris 330 1 1 4' East 355' south of Ave. 48 on Washington Poor/clogged Cracking 331 2 T East 215' north of Ave.'48 on Washington Poor/clogged 332 3 T East 980' south of Ave. 47 on Washington Poor/clogged 333 4 21' East 230' north of Simon Dr. on Washington Good/some debris 334 5 14' East 380' north of Simon Dr. on Washington Fair/lots of debris 335 6 T East 60' south of 111 on Washington Good 336 7 7' East 15' north of 111 on Washington Good/few cracks 337 8 4' 1 East 620' north of Chanel on Washington Fair/lots of debris 338 9 10' East 0' north of Via Sevilla on Washington Poor/clogged 129 • • • Fred Waring Dr. CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 339 1 10 1 10' South - 680' East of Adams on Fred Waring Dr. Poor/lots of debris 340 11 4' South 1270' west of Dune Palms on Fred Waring Dr. Poor/clogged 341 12 4' South 270' west of Monticelloa on Fred Waring Dr. Poor/clogged and severe crackin 342 13 1 4' North 5' west of Adams on Fred Waring Dr. Poor/clogged 343 14 1 4' North 200' west of Adams on Fred Waring Dr. Poor/clogged 344 15 1 4' North 400' west of Adams on Fred Waring Dr. Poor/clogged and severe cracking 345 16 1 4' North 60V west of Adams on Fred Waring Dr. Poor/clogged Miles Ave. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 346 17 5' South 200' west of Adams on Miles Poor/clogged 347 18 10' South 250' east of Dune Palms on Miles Poor/clogged 348 19 10' South 400' east of Dune Palms on Miles Good/some debris 349 20 10' South 600' east of Dune Palms on Miles Good /some debris 350 21 12' North 2' west of Verbena on Miles Fair /some cracking 351 22 14' North 60' east of Los Manos on Miles Fair/ some trash & debris 352 23 1 4' North 200' west of Adams on Miles Poor/lots of debris 353 24 14' North V east of No Harland on Miles Fair/lots of debris Ave. 47 CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 354 25 4' South 1040' West of Adams on Ave. 47 Poortwater does not flow 355 26 T North 1040' West of Adams on Ave. 47 Fair /some cracking 356 27 6' North 500' West of Adams on Ave. 47 Fair /some cracking Ave. 48 CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 357 65 14' South 580' west of Adams on Ave. 48 Poor/cracking and trash 358 66 T South 1140' east of Adams on Ave. 48 Fair/lots of Debris 359 67 T North 11 30' east of Adams on Ave. 48 Good /some debris 360 68 14' North 600' west of Adams on Ave. 48 Good /some debris Eisenhower CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 361 69 4' North 20' east of the west gate of Laguna De la Paz Fair/cracking 362 70 4' 'West 1000' south of Avenida Fermando on Eisenhower PoorAots of debris 363 71 4' West 250' north of Avenida Mazatlan on Eisenhower Poor/lots of debris _ 364 72 4' West 2' north of Avenida Mazatlan on Eisenhower Poor/bad condition 365 73 24' West 160' south of Avenida. Mazatlan on Eisenhower Poor/clogged 366 74 8' 1 East 150' south of Ave. 50 on Eisenhower Poor/clogged • • Ave. 50 CB # Photo # Size Sldc of Strcct Location 1perDendicular Condition lPoor/clogged 367 75 4' North 150' east of La go on Ave. 50 Poor/clogged 368 76 4' South to CB# 366 369 77 1 T-1 South 20' east of Eisenhower on Ave. 50 Good /few cracks 370 78 4' 2' west of Washington on Ave. 50 Poor /clo ed 371 79 4' 800' west of Park on Ave. 50 372 80 4' 675' east of Park on Ave 50 373 81 3 ' V—Sout:h 750' east of Park on Ave: 50 374 82 3' 1000' East of Park on Ave. 50 375 83 25' 1250' west of Park on Ave. 50 376 84 T South 950' west of Jefferson on Ave. 50 377 85 T North 165V west of Jefferson on Ave. 50 378 86 4' North 1255' east of Park on Ave. 50 379 87 4' North 1000' East of Park on Ave. 50 'west 380 88 T North 800' Park on Ave. 50 381 89 4' North 2' east of Washington on Ave. 50 Westward Ho Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 382 90 T South Per ndicular to CB# 282 on Westward Ho Fair /some debris 383 91 T North 900' west of Via Aliso on Westward Ho Good 384 92 4' South 190' west of Dune Palm on Westward Ho Fair /some debris 385 93 15 North 192' west of Dune Palm on Westward Ho Fair /some debris 386 94 4' South 33' east of Dune Palm on Westward Ho Fair /some debris 387 95 10' South Perpendicular to south end of Spyglass Hills on Westward Ho Good 388 98 10' North 2' west of Spyglass Hills on Westward Ho Good /few cracks 389 97 4' East East end of Palm Circle Fair Vista Grande CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street I Location Condition No Catch Basins Via Tran uila CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Calle Serera CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Fiesta Dr. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Cortez CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 390 98 1 4' South Fair /some debris 391 99 4' North 350' west of Randsummer on Cortez Fair /some debris • • Highway 111 CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location _ 12001 Condition 392 100 1 14' South 90' east of La Quinta Drive on Highway 111 Good/some debris 393 101 1 T South east of Dune Palms on Highway 111 Fair /some debris 394 102 1 4' 1 . South 0' west of Jefferson on Highway 111 PoorAots of debris 395 103 T' North 0' west of Jefferson on Highway 111 Fair /some debris 396 104 4' North 100' west of Dune Palms on Highway 111 Fair /some debris 397 105 10' North 5' east of Simon on Highway 111 Fair /some debris 398 106 4' North 330' west of Simon'On Highway 111 Good/some debris 399 107 4' North 620' west of Simon on Highway 111 Fair /some debris 400 108 4' North side of lslancQ555, east bound on Highway 111 on the island Good/some debris 401 109 4' North 0' west of Washington on Highway 111 Good Monticello Ave. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 402 110 14' West 15' south of fred Waring on Monticello Fair /some debris 403 111 20' 1 West 50' south of Herrings on Monticello Good /some debris 404 112 8' East 90' North of Mem uila on Monticello Good/some debris 405 113 4' West 70' south of Independence on Monticello Good/some trash 406 114 T East 40' south of Independence on Monticello Good 407 115 38' West 100' north of Declaration on Monticello Good 408 118 1 T East 175' south of Morris on Monticello Good Randolph Court CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins bassador Circ CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Hemings Way CB # Photo #1 Size Side o Street Location Condition No Catch Basins America Court CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Memorial Place CB # Photo #I Size Side of Street Location Condition 409 117 8' East East end of Memorial Fair /some debris dependence Wa CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition 410 118 4' South 30' west of Jefferson on Independence Good 411 119 4' 1 North 26 west of Jefferson on Independence Good • • Morris Ave. CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 412 120 14' South 0' west of Liberty on Moms Fair /some debris 413 121 9' North 0' west of Liberty on Morris Good Franklin Court CB #1 Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Liberty Ave. CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins illiam Stone Wa CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Shadwell Circle CB # Photo # Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Dandelion Dr. CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Declaration Courl CB #1 Photo # I Size Side of Street Location Condition No Catch Basins Corporate Centre CB # Photo #1 Size Side of Street Location Condition 414 122 4' West West end of Cor erate Centre Good/little debris 415 123 T I South 130 East of Adams on Corporate Centre Good/little debris 416 124 T North 30' East of Adams on Corporate Centre Good 417 125 4' South 170' East of Adams on Cor rate Centre Fair /some debris 416 125 4' North 170' East of Adams on Corporate Centre Good • • 0 CryGIS 2 - Print Page 1 of I Scale: l" -1000' P S O M A S Tradition Golf Course N CityGIS2 Copyngtt ® 2002. All Rods Reserved La Quinta, CA The irdomatiaon cu tained herein is the proprietary prq�erty d the cdnbriars suMlied ruder license anc may rot be reproduced except as 5 ceraed by 134tal Map Prod -ts ht p: // maps .digitalmapcerAral.com /CityGIS2 /print /print.html 02/06/2004 - ------ -- - M. �uziti:fffluZi-d--WfLYUGIbIlLAWUIU7ULAEji,:,XiaSKSkL)igiazing-(;atcnfsasinsX(;atchBasin-Digil.mxd ch 400200 0 400 800 11200 F assn cations City of La Quinta Cove Area" lJllll R�7 N 4, 4 z � f 3 j , �a a P __J/� ° A, �- pp tt L i. 1 L �Z j � � I 1 x mow® ... i® a- .r .ii• ■cam .. ®INIF i�if1.111i ��anar 111111 nnxlcl�lia�■ /ird�iliR "�rr ■' ■ ®: ■■rr■ ■■ - I it I I I� Yi1�:+�fi1 ®iiillfNii rr�sH /r�r® _ iw 4, 4 z � f 3 j , �a a P __J/� ° A, �- pp tt L i. 1 L �Z j � � I 1 x mow® ... i® a- .r .ii• ■cam .. ®INIF i�if1.111i ��anar 111111 nnxlcl�lia�■ /ird�iliR "�rr ■' ■ ®: ■■rr■ ■■ - I it I I I� Yi1�:+�fi1 ®iiillfNii rr�sH /r�r® _ rr■ rnurer�® 4 e- `_ I� 71 i i a STREET PARCEL ............... I 1 1 � CITY BOUNDARY 1 ................ CONTOUR [a] 20 Foot Intervals 100 Foot Intervals 1000 Foot intervals 1 R� ........ ........ of "Aerial Photo" 0 1 2 4 Miles a STREET PARCEL ............... I 1 1 � CITY BOUNDARY 1 ................ CONTOUR [a] 20 Foot Intervals 100 Foot Intervals 1000 Foot intervals 1 R� ........ ........ of "Aerial Photo" 0 1 2 4 Miles 0% � \l N MrAg Legend I � mn WESTWARD HO (D 0 we N - -------------- - -- 1� F 0 � LDR Os M/RC p 00 Citv of La Quinta "General Zoning" 0 1 a i miles - DSMItA ~~.... _-_-. _--- ---- ---- —'-- -4&w m _ DEL CLUB .......................... I __ CLUB CLUB ON ICLM CLUB _.......... __ .�.� A FONDA f- LA -FO 777Z ` CAMP CAMP 1 ° GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=4D0' ol -' ORIZABA IAR MQRUGAdA NQR LOS VER ES ~~.... _-_-. _--- ---- ---- —'-- -4&w m _ DEL CLUB .......................... I __ CLUB CLUB ON ICLM CLUB _.......... __ .�.� A FONDA f- LA -FO 777Z ` CAMP CAMP 1 ° GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=4D0' ol -' MEMORANDUM • TO: Bill Whittenberg FROM: Alex Meiiez DATE: November 10, 2003 SUBJECT: RWQCB Permitting Requirements for the City of La Quinta Project No.: 1 LAQ010100 Task 2 The following information identifies stormwater permitting requirements for New Development / Redevelopment, Construction, and Municipal Agency activities for the City of La Quinta governed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in the Colorado River Basin — Region 7. New Development / Redevelopment New Development is considered construction on an undisturbed parcel. A Redevelopment project is any project where major modifications to an existing site or structure requiring a permit is undertaken. Routine maintenance, interior remodeling, re- roofing, and parking lot maintenance are not included. In addition, a Redevelopment project is not to be confused with the projects undertaken by the Redevelopment Agency. Planning Review Procedures Permittees are required to implement the following stormwater management measures during planning, construction, and completion phases of a development project. 1. Permittees are required to present procedures for approval of grading, building, and similar permits modified including BMPs listed in the New Development Guidelines, otherwise known as as Supplement "A" and attached to this memo. Supplement "A" satisfies the requirements of BMP R15 and comprises the single largest component of the new development and redevelopment program element. 2. Permittees are required to make information from Supplement "A" available to applicants for development as early in permitting process as possible. 3. Permittees will develop implementation procedures for New Development BMP guidelines, including training and education for employees who will implement Supplement "A" information. 4. Implementing staff will notify the applicant at the earliest possible opportunity if there is a known water quality problem that might affect the proposed development. 5. Permittees will include educational outreach on the above stated guidelines including Supplement "A" to architects, engineers, and other land development personnel. 6. Permittees will adopt and implement the development and approval review procedures outlined in Supplement "A," as described. General Conditions (to be applied by municipalities): For discretionary actions that include a precise plan of development: 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, the permit applicant shall include in its development plans for approval by the County/City Official(s) water quality management controls by specifically identifying BMPs that will be used onsite to control predictable pollutant runoff. The permit applicant shall identify the structural and non - structural measures specified in this Supplement or other equally effective standard detailing implementation of BMPs whenever they are applicable to the project; the assignment of long -term maintenance responsibilities; and shall reference the location of structural BMPs. For Subdivisions of Land: • 2. Applicant shall identify and include in its plans those routine structural and non - structural BMPs PSOMAS Page 1 outlined in Supplement "A" or other equally effective standard for approval of County /City officials. • Special Conditions ➢ Prior to issuance of certificates for building use and occupancy or building permits for individual tenant improvements or construction permits for a tank or pipeline, uses shall be identified and, for special uses (where the proposed improvements will store, generate, or handle hazardous. materials in quantities that will require permitting and inspections once operational), the applicant shall propose plans and measures for chemical management (including, but not limited to, storage, emergency response, employee training, spill contingencies and disposal) to the satisfaction of the County/City Building Official(s). ➢ Chemical management plans shall be approved by the County /City and other appropriate agencies such as County /City Fire Department, the Health Services Agency's Department of Environmental Health, and sewering and/or water agencies to ensure implementation of each agency's respective requirements. Approval by the appropriate agencies shall be furnished to the Building and Safety Department, prior to the issuance of any certificates of use and/or occupancy. ➢ Certificates or permits may be ministerially withheld if features needed to properly manage chemicals cannot be incorporated into a previously completed building, center, or complex. ➢ A list of specified uses and occupancies of concern should be developed by each jurisdiction according to their needs. Educational Program for Developers and Contractors An Educational program will contain legal, administrative, and technical information needed to acquaint developers and contractors with the NPDES program. Construction Activities Public Works Projects • ➢ Permittees must notify the RWQCB of any public works construction projects that would normally require coverage under the SWRCB Construction Activity Permit (General Construction Permit). ➢ Permittees must develop and implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) for construction activities that exceed five acres of disturbed soil. Following this process, the Permittees are not required to submit a NOI to the SWRCB; however, public works construction monitoring includes site inspections before anticipated storm events and after actual storm events to verify SWPPP implementation. Non - Public Works Projects (Private Sector) ➢ Permittees will inform contractors, operators, and agency staff about upcoming educational and training workshops on construction site erosion control and construction materials management sponsored by a professional organizations and public agencies. Materials are to be made available at the public counter and staff bulletin boards, as appropriate. ➢ Permittees are to review legal description of Part 1 Permit Application and existing grading and erosion control ordinances, if any, to determine the adequacy of existing controls for construction site erosion, sedimentation, and construction material pollutants (i.e. paints, masonry wastes, etc.). The evaluation should also include an assessment of enforcement actions. ➢ Permittees will establish a model construction site control ordinance for potential future adoption by the co- applicants in Riverside County. The ordinance will require control of pollutants from construction sites including erosion and construction material. ➢ Permittees must verify that applicants have filed a NOI prior to the issuance of a grading permit for projects that require coverage under the General Construction Permit. Public and Private Sector Projects ➢ Permittees will include education on the New Development Guidelines, or Supplement "A," in outreach • to architects, engineers and other land development personnel. PSOMAS Page 2 ➢ In addition, permittees will identify priorities for inspecting sites and enforcing control measures for construction projects that disturb greater than 5 acres (Phase 1 requirements), between 1 and 5 acres • (Phase II requirements), and sites disturbing less than 1 acre. Training ➢ Permittees will develop and provide informational and appropriate training sessions that can be provided to staff who conduct construction site inspections. Topics will cover Phase 1 and Phase II regulations, SWPPP preparation, and site inspection criteria and priorities. ➢ Permittees will describe workshops and efforts to publicize them to target audience. ➢ Permittees will describe educational materials developed in support of Supplement "A." ➢ Permittees will confirm that existing ordinances adequately address Phase I and Phase II requirements. ➢ Permittees will confirm compliance with Supplement "A." ➢ Permittees will list priorities, develop implementation schedule for inspections. Conduct site inspections within existing building/grading inspection framework based on priorities. Municipal Agency Activities Permittees will coordinate with other watershed stakeholders (e.g., Caltrans and the Bureau of Indian Affairs) is desirable. Sewage Systems ➢ Municipalities are to follow sewage response plans to prevent unintentional sewage spills from entering the municipal storm drain system. The sewage response plan includes procedures for notifying the RWQCB and other appropriate agencies, containing and cleaning up the spill. ➢ Permittees are to review and revise, if necessary, and implement sewage spill response plans. Municipal Facilities and Operations ➢ Permittees are required to conduct employee training in both stormwater and non - stormwater BMPs • related to municipal facilities and operations. ➢ Permittees are directed to identify storm sewer systems which drain areas where fleet vehicles are stored and maintained and determine drainage paths for runoff to the storm drain system. In accordance with this requirement, permittees must develop a work plan to be submitted to the RWQCB. ➢ Permittees are to prepare a model pollution prevention plan for maintenance areas for implementation. ➢ Permittees are to incorporate BMPs from Supplement "A" on new maintenance and materials storage areas, where applicable. ➢ Permittees will continue to rely primarily on staff training and education to minimize pollutant discharge from publicly maintained landscaped areas such as parks, medians, and civic center areas. However, the permittees will adopt a BMP to reinforce state regulations for pesticide use. Streets and Roads ➢ Requires municipal employee training specifically designed to educate staff on pavement maintenance, repair, and cleaning. ➢ Requires municipalities to contract a service provider for sweeping major streets, catch basin clean -out services, and sweep collector streets at regular intervals. Storm Drain Systems ➢ Requires inspections, cleaning of retention/detention basins, debris basins, open channels, drain inlets, and catch basins. Report improper discharges to storm drainage system. Training ➢ Permittees will conduct comprehensive training sessions that focus on all aspects of municipal facilities and roadway operations for public works staff in the form of annual refresher workshops. Reporting /Documentation • Permittees will accomplish evaluation and assessment of BMP performance and compliance through the following reporting and documentation activities: PSOMAS Page 3 ■ Permittees with jurisdiction over a wastewater collection system to confirm the sewage spill response plans are developed and current. • Permittees will show compliance by ensuring that vehicle maintenance and material storage yards develop and maintain a pollution prevention plan. ■ Permittees will show compliance by listing vehicle maintenance and materials storage areas and indicating sections that have been implemented. r i LJ is • Permittees will continue the use of existing data collection forms. Permittees will quantify the percentage of landscape maintenance personnel that have received training/outreach. Permittees will document any other staff training activities. • Permittees will provide a list of personnel for pesticide application and verify certification. • Permittees will show compliance of BMPs by providing copy of a BMP fact sheet. • Permittee will verify specifications included in applicable contracts. • Permittees will verify that stencils are maintained on all inlets. ■ Permittees will monitor statewide Phase I and Phase II municipal program activities and participate in evaluation of activities. ■ Permittees will describe maintenance activities. Attachment: Supplement "A" to the Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plans, New Development Guidelines (Supplement "A ") PSOMAS , 44, :. • Page 4 • AUG 12 2003 11:05 FR PSOMAS 714 545 8883 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.02 SUPPLEMENT A. TO THE RNEI,SIDE COUNTY DRAr.N'AGE AREA NtkNAGEMEN T PLANS NEW DEV L OPMENT GUIDELINES A COOPER4,TIVE PROJECT OF T.HE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, INCORPORATED CJTMS, COACF LJ=LT.A VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND THE PIVERSIDE COUNMY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AUG 12 2003 11:05 FR PSOMAS I .1 714 545 8883 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.03 SUPPLE NTEnrr A TO TBE RrV'ERSIDE COUNTY DKAWAGE AREA MANAGEMENT PLANS NEW DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES 1 NEW DEVELOPMENT 4 by . Riverside Couuty-Printing Services April 1996 AUG 12 2003 11:05 FR PSOMAS w� 1. - I � 1 i 714 545 eee3 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.04 ACKNOWL,EDGMEN*S The development •of this document, Supplement, "A" to The Santa Ana, Santa .Margarita and - VPhiteu�ater DraAinage Area IVlanagement Plan .(better known as the New Development GuideIines), took the time and efforts of-a greatmany people over a year and a half. First of all, the Santa Ana/Santa' Margarita National PoIhitant Discharge - Elimination' System (NPDES). Advisory ComraiZee thanks the Orange County Envjronibental Management Agency for the use of their work; it helped to establish the pattern and content of this doc=enL Special thanks to Mr. Jerry Linton for his very capable and unselfish leadership as chairman. of the Constiution and New Development Sub - committee, Thanks to Arturo Diaz for keeping the sub - committee minutes and making the myrads of changes that occurred during the development of this document. Many thanks to the following sub- comsnittee members: Bob Brock • City of Mumeta Tason Christie Riverside County Flood Control Chuck Collins Arturo Diaz, Secretary Riverside County Coordinating COMML (Trans Pacific Consultants) Riverside County FIood Control Delia.Garrison City Of Riverside Rodney Hanway* Building Tndusny Association ShelIi Lamb Riverside- Corona RCD Jexr3' 41WQn, Chairman Citation Builders Ibhn-PbMps- -- - - -- - -S-aa Diego kegio--nO -WQCB- John Pourkazemi City of Temecula Mark Raab - City of Norco Mimi R.,!yl 'Lewis Homes John Ristow Viren Shah Riverside County Transportation City of Corona -_- . -- Pavlova Vitale - - -- - -. -Saab A.na Regional W CB - Corrdsponding member t The Construction and New Development Sub - Committee would like to thank the expert parr;cipants who provided the necessary information and testimony needed to fairly develop the guidelines found in, this document Richard Boon Gerald Breitbarr Mehnda.Luthin 2viiks Shetler Ron W116.iss KF. (Kim) Wiseman Orange County EMA . California Restatirant Association Arco Products Company County Environmental Health Western States Petroleum Association Chevron U.S.A- Products Company Their comments and assistance contributed- substantially to the development of the present • document_ AUG 12 2003 11:05 FR PSOMAS 714 545 eee3 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.05 i II I ' ' TABLE OF CONTENTS. rI.0 INTRODUCTION .:.................. . --•-------- .............. :................ ..... ... .............. ....�.._. X ' 2.0 BACKGROUND ..................... . . . . . .. ...... ...:........:_---- ...........- -- ........ - - - -- ------------------------ I '3.0 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PROCESS ---------------- -------------------------------------------------------- 2 4_0 BNT SFLEC -RGN 4.1 Non- suuctuzal Measures.... ... .. ..................... =................ .. ............. 4- 42 Routine Structural BMPs-- - ------ - - -- ------------ - -- - -- - - -- - • - - - -•- - - - - - -- - 7 4.3 Special Structural BMPs .... ................ ........... -- ................... .. ....... .......................... 9 -5.0 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPERS AND CONTRACTORS ...... ........ •9 I TABLE'S Table 1: Appropriatd Nonstructural BMP's Table 2: Routine Strucrural BMP's ATTACHMENT Selection and Design of Sto=water Quality Controls (under separate cover) • AUG 12 2003 11:06 FR PSOMAS 41 i I .'' * J 1.0 INTRODUCTION 714 545 ee83 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.06 This document is to be used by Riverside County NPDES Co- permittees county -wide. -as -a supplement to the Drainage Area Management Flan(s) (DAMP). it was developed by :the Construction and NTew Development Sub - committee, and approved by the NPDES Advisory �:ontmittee. Appendix G of the Orange County Drainage Area Nianagement Plan; dated April 1993, served as a model for the development of this document. The objective in preparing this Supplement "A" was to identify post construction source pollutant pmYenticq 2{pd.. treattuent ,measures that could be incorporated. -into- ;development projects:.:T u's- Supplementpecommends which Best Management Practices•(BMPs) should be requiredas*standard practice. For projects with unique water quality issues additional applicable solutions may be required on a case by case basis. . The DAMP does not specify a minimum development size to be considered for ' W applications nor does it specify which, land. uses should receive the most .attention - In general, BMPs are. required on a wide variety of land uses, both residential and non - residential. BMPs should also be required on accessory uses of concern (such as outdoor material/equipmerit storage, vehicle/ equipment fuelin& and service) and certain low intensity, but potentially high polluting uses (such as golf courses and plant nurseries). Z6 BACKGROUND Tn 1987 Congress amended the Clean Water Act to require'rhe permitting of stotmwater discharges from municipal storm drain systems. The EPA promulgated regulations in 1990 to enact the new law. Tn the regulations (and the preceding draft regulations), EPA listed the County of Riverside as a county that roust obtain an NPDES permit. I Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 'and Coachella Valley Water Distinct (as applicable) to be included in the NPDES permits. The NPDES permits require the perruittees to control the discharge of pollutants to the Waters of I the United States by the implementation of BMPs. These BNIPs are listed in the Santa Ana and Santa Margarita Permits and DAMPs and in the `Proposed Management Pro_erarns' section of the Eastern Riverside Counry 'NPDES Part 2 Applicariozz Thi:..members of the Santa Ana/Santa Margarita Advisory Committee recognized the sensitive issue of imposing development and construction B?vlPs on the bolding industry_ They, therefore, formed the Construction and New Development Sub - Committee. The Sub - committee included representatives from the co- p4itrees, development companies, Building Industry Association, 'Western States Petroleum Association, engineering companies and the Riverside Couinry Coordinating Committee. The .group developed this document with particular insight from and • cooperation of tlae' development industry. The BMPs proposed herein will meet the permit requirements while not imposing undue burden on those that are to implement he actions called for. AUG 12 2003 11:06 FR PSOMAS 714 545 eee3 TO WEST LA OFFICE 3:0 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PROCESS 1 i 4., P.07 The Municipal Stoll Water Permit states that stormwater quality management should Abe. considered during a project's.planning phase, implemented during. construction. and ultimately. maintained for the life of rbe project As.such, standard conditions, of approval were -developed; to address land use areas of concern to min�e-the 'mount of pollution entering the drainage system_ Each municipality should require the-implementation of BMPs for redevelopment and specified new deyelopicuent A redevelopment project.is any project where major modifications to an existing site- and./or structure requirigg a permit is undertaken.- maintenance; interior remodeling, minor structural additions, reroofing, and maintenance.of parking lots -are intended-to be .exempt A redevelopment project is not to be confused with the projects sponsored by a RedevelopmemT Agency of a jurisdiction. It is assumed that each jurisdiction will• further define a "redevelopment project", utiliZ:rng,its own permitting citteria_ Planing review procedures must be adopted -and uniformly implemented by all the municipalities to ensure consistency. The typical process is outlined as follows: The present municipal procedure for approval of grading, building, and similar permits will be modified to include incorporation of the -BMPs listed. in Tables l •and 2; as applicable. - - - 2: 3 v1-i imcipaIities- w4l- make.zhisSupplement_d% g iTn eel nration.ofB_MPs available to development applicants through the pe'rmitting/land development process. Applicants will be informed at the earliest possible point of processing of these requirements. 3. Municipalities will develop implementation p-ocedures for the new development BMP ovidelines, including training and education for the employees tha *_ Aill impleriuent this - Supplement. 4. Implementing staff will notify applicant -at The earliest possible opportunity if there is a known water quality problem which might affect the proposed development. The municipal permitting/development review process will verify that plans contain all. the applicable BMPs. Compliance is intended to be a matter of incorporating the measures specified in this Supplement or other acceptable standard into the plans and submittals currently required by each municipality, and the review process w'iIl effectively be a verification that these are included. GEARAL CONDITIONS to be appIied.by municipalities: For discretionary actions that include a precise plan of development: L Prior to issuance of building permits, the permit applicant shall include in -its • developmentpla.*ts for approval by County /City Official(s) water gLiality management controls by specifically identif}, ng BMPs that will be used onsite to control predictable pollutant runoff- AUG 12 2003 11:06 FR PSOMRS 714 545 8883 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.08 The permit applicant-shall identify the structural and non - structural measures specified in this Supplement :or other equally effective standard detailing implementation o BMPs whenever tbey arc applicable to the project (when the project has a loading. dock, for example); the assigunent oflong -term maintenance respor�ibiliues (specifying.6e developer; parcel owner, maintenance association, lessee, etc.); and shall reference the location(s) -of structural 13Ws. 'For Subdivisions of Land: 2. Prior to recordation• and if determined applicable b Coun /Ci Officials applicant _. pp , y � ry Official( s), �P .. shall identify and'include in its plans those routine 'structural and non - structural B1vfPs outlined in this Supplement or other equally effective standard, fof approval of County/ City officials. Both conditions 1'and 2'also functionally apply io public.projects where, the local jUnisdiction technically chooses not to issue formal permits to itself or hired contractors, but nonetheless undertakes the work- ' SPECALLCONllT1<'1rONS;., When a building is being proposed for which no anticipated use is designated or when an uaanticipated,element of land use or occupancy is proposed after a basic building has already . been completed, use of language sim-2ar to the following ctmdition•is recommended for inclusion _. __in-the-conditionrwhich-rmst be~-satisffed- prior- to- issuanc---of*c- appropri�-p-dfhait:- Prior to issuance of certificates of use and occupancy or building permits for individual tenant improvements or construction permits for a tank or pipeline, uses shall be identified and, far specified uses (where the proposed improvements will store, generate or handle hazardous materials in quantities that .will require permitting and inspection once operational), the applicant shall propose plans , and measures for chemical. manAgement_ (Lucluding, . bm not_ -... to the satisfaction of the County / City Building Of£cial(s). Chemical management plans shall be approved by the County /City and other. appropriate agencies such as County /City Fire Department, the Health Services Agency's Department of Environmental Health, and sewering and/or water agencies to ensure implementation of each agency's respective requirements: Approval by the appropriate--agencies shall be fumi' shed to the Building and Safety Department', prior to, the issuance of any certificates of use and/or occupancy. Certificates orpermits may be ministerially withheld if featuies needed to properly manage chemicals cannot be incorporated into a previously completed building, center, or comple:c. A list of specified uses and occupancies of concern sbould be developed by each ,jurisdiction according to their needs. AUG 12 2003 11:06 FR PSOMAS 714 545 8883 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.09 4 :0 BMP SELECTION The )DAMP requires identification and implemeritation of BWs for new developmehi via regulatory and enforcement activities. This Supplemeixt•lists particular routine structural and non - structural BNPs that will be evaluated -for application and intensity for these activities. Thus, some of the Bdv1Ps listed herein will become conditions- of approval for new'development and construction. The measures identified in Tables 1 and 2 are to be deemed "standard practice" to be required on new developments, as specified. Two.- general Ter-ins used in'this suppleinent are--defined by example as follows: ST mcmral Controls: Physical facilities or controls, which may include secondary containment, ' first flush diversion, . 4etention/retention,basins, infiI.tration trenches/basias, oiVgrease separators, .grass swales, and engineering and design modification of exist7ng structures. These examiDl'es include both routine structural contrbls and special structural controls. 1 Non - structural Controls: In general, these would be activities or programs to educate the public on proper disposal of hazardoushoxic wastes, regulatory approaches, street sweeping and facility maintenance, detection and elimination of illicit connections and illegal dumping. Each new development will be require-d•to implement appropriate, non- structural Blvd's in keeping with- •the -sire- and - tyke. of. dev-e lopment ,.and_potentW-fgr.st9rmwater pollution, to min m the introduction of pollutants onto the drainage system.. ' Each riew development will also be required to implement appropriate `routine" srmctural BMPs in keeping with the Hie and type of development, and potential for stormwazer pollution. "Routine" strucm al Chips are economical, practicable, small scale measures which can be feasibly applied at The smallest_ unit of development A major concept of the County's NPDES storinwater „quOry program, as .set forth in. the Riverside County DAMP; is a regional approacb to stormwater� quality planning and management on a watershed basis. Later, "special” structural Bh2Ps may be installed to address any specific water quality problems identified iii the watershed planning process. "Special" structural BWs.are en»ered facilities designed to address-specific water quality problems identified in the watershed planning process, runoff management plan, EEQA process, or similar watershed planning. There may be the need to revisit these requirements at-an,as yet unspecified date or frequency. Eforts will be directed toward determining the effectiveness of structural BAfPs before they are required. Those measures which demon trate.superidr cost - effectiveness, considering right- of -wav, construction, operation, maintenance, monitorng,• and pollutant removal, may be adopted as special stmctuta.i $MPs for application as indicated during the watershed planning studies. 4.1 Non-structural Measures is 1Nt1_ Education for Propeny Owners, Teaants.and Occupants -Project conditions of approval for all new developments will require that the developer provide envi_ronrzental awareness education materials on general good housekeeping practices that contribute 'AUG 12 2003 11:06 FR PSOMAS I .. i i 714 545 Bee3 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.10 to protection of stormwater quality to all initial residents, occupants /tenants. Such materials will be.provided to the developer throiigh;•the co- perminPes'. Countywide education program. Different materials for resitlential, office commercial, retail commercial, vehicle- related commercial, and industrial uses will be Involved. N2. Activity Restrictions - If a property R hers .association (POA) or homeowners association .( OA) is formed, conditions, covenants, and' restrictions shall inc bde measures shown in Table No. I•'forthe purpose of surface water gbality..protection. N3_ .Common Area Landscape Management All, pesticides shall be applied 'in strict" accordance tcl pesticide application laws as stated .h2 ;the. State. of California Agricultural Code. All pesticide applicators shall be certified by the State as a Qualified Applicator or be directly supervised by, a Qualified Applicator. All fertilizers shall be applied at - the raTe stipulated by the manufacturer. Fertilizer Applicators shall trained ined in the proper procedures of deterinining fertilizer rates arsd calibration of application equipment Fertilizer shall be applied iri such a manner as _to avoid application onto hardscape surfaces_ Annual soil tests are recommended to advise on which fertiliser elements are needed to avoid application of unnecessary elements, or over application. The local water agency or. resource conservation district can assist with detailed info: matiori.concerr ing this BIA N4. Common Area Catch Basin Inspection - For developments with POAsIHOAs and Privately maintained drainage systems, the association will be required to have privately - - - • - • - owned -catch - basir�s�„cpectcd�n� �fne:cessary, -cleatiezi�rior tti tote- star��ea�on,' no' • - later than October 1 Sth each year. 1`T5. POAIHOA Common Area. Litter Control -For developments with.an association, the POA/HOA will be required to implement trash management and litter control procedures in the common- areas aimed at reducing pollution of drainage water. The associations may contract with their landscape maintenance firma tti provide this seryie_e. _. - - -- --a - .,-,,..0 vi uLLU1.PCLLLUj,, VLU.7lyrUg of trash receptacles in common areas, noting trash disposal violations by homeowners or businesses, and reporting the violations to the association for investigation_ N6. Streer Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots - For'developmezrs with POAs/HOAs, and privately owned streets and parlang lots; The association will be required to have the streets and parking lots swept prior to the storm season; no later than October 15th each year_ N7.. Underground Storage Tank Compliance - Compli ance with State regulations dealing with underground storage tanks vvill:be enforced by the County Department of Environmental Health on behalf of the State. N8, Spill Contingency Plan -A spill contingency plan (Business PlatJHaza -dotes Materials Management Plan) shall be prepared by the oAmer /operator in accordance with Section 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Environmental Health Depar=ertt • or the Fire Deparanent in the' City of Riverside, Corona, or Banning shalt be responsible for enforcement. Spills will be immediately cleaned up according to the Spill Contingency Plan_ AUG 12 2003 11:07 FR PSOMAS 714 545 eee3 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.11 t N9, Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance = Compliance with County /City ordinames Shall be enforced by the Environmental Health Department or the Fire Department in the City of Riverside, Corona; or Banning. N10. Uniform Fire Code lmplementatlon Plan - Compliance with Aiticle 80 of the Uniform Fire Code enforced by fire protection agency will. be required Nll. Title 22 •CCR Compliance - e6inpliance with title 22 of the "California Code of ' Regulations and relevant sections of the California Health & Safety-Code •regarding hazardous waste managemerttr will be enforced b�; the County Department of Envirbnrnental Health. on behalf°of the State. N12. Housekeeping of Loading pocks, Loading docks for grocery, drug and.discount stores, and' warehouse type commercial and industrial buildings, must be- kept in a clean ;and orderly condition through a regular program of•sweepiD& litter control, and immediate cleanup of spills and broken containers. Polluted rnater al or wash •waters shall not be allowed to discharge into a storm drain. N13. Employee Trainingl.Edubazion Program' (see NI) as it would apply to.future employees of individual businesses - Based on information provided- through the County -wide education program, developer either prepares manual(s) for initial purchasers- of business sites or, for development that is constructed for, an,unspeci ied•ause conveys = - �dmmitment- for.- this- responsibili�te- YOA•or-ptmcha_seL N14. BMP Maurtenance - The r Tbasibility for implementation of each non - structural B.N,2 and scheduled cleaning of all sttvetural BMP controls shall be identified (owner, agency name, phone number, and address). AUG 12 2003 11:07 FR PSOMAS 714 545 eee3 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.12 4,2 Routine S•tructu rat BMPs SL Control of Impervious Runoff, Impervious areas shall be graded and constructed so as to drain to- a filtration 13W, such as a landscaped area or equally effective alternative wherevdr practicable and as recommended by-the engineer of record. Direct drainage from impervious areas to the street qr a.storm drain facility is discouraged and should -be avoided.-For example, parking lot catch basins could be plat -ed in landscaped areas with allowances for, minor. ponding_ S2. Common Area Efficient Irrigation - All sites shall employ multi- pr "ogsammable.. ungauon controllers -which have enough programs to break up all irrigation stations into hydrozones. If practical and feasible, rain shutoff devices shall be employed•to prevent irrigation after significant precipitation. Irrigation systems shall be designed so areas which have different water iise requirements. are not mixed on the same station (hydrozones). Assistance in implementing a schedule based on plant water needs .is available from CMS or Mobile Lab. The use of drip irrigation should be considered for all planter areas which have a shrub density that will cause excessive spray interference of an overhead irrigation system. Use flow reducers to mitigate broken heads next to sidewalks, streets and driveways. S3. Common Area Runoff-minimizing Landscape Design - Group plants with similar water requirements in order to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration', where practical.. Examples could include the following; a. Use mulches in planter areas without ground cover to avoid sedimentation runoff- b. Set irrigation times to avoid runoff. This will involve spitting nightly irrigations into several short cycles if slope and soil conditions warrant. C. Use only enough water to provide for adequate plant health and growth d. Use the water budget mode to make global/weather related scheduling changes. e. Use CMS data for global changes so they will accurately reflect weather changes. f. Install appropriate plant materials for the location, in accordance 'Arith sunset climate zones. g. Ins -rail plants with low water requirements and consider the use of native plant material where possible and recommended by the landscape architect. S4_ Community Car 'Wash Racks - In high density multifamily developments (apartments, stacked flats) larger than 100 twits where car washing is allowed, and development having a common parking area, a designated car wash area which does not drain directly to a storm drain shall be provided for common usage. An example of such an area • would 'be joint use of an open space or visitor parking area. gash waters a-om this ama may be directed to the sanitary. sewer (with prior approval of the sewering agency), to an engineered infiltration, or equally'effective alter- iative. 7 AUG 12 2003 11:07 FR PSOMAS 714 545 8883 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.13 S5. Wash Water Controls for Food Preparation Areas - Food establishments (per State Health and Safety Code 27520) shall have contained' areas, Door sink(s) and/or mop sink(s) with sanitary sewer connections for cleaning of kitchen floor mats' and- for disposal of wash wafers containing kitchen and food -Aw' tes, if located outside. The• contained area shall also be covered to prevent entry of storrnwater. r S6. Trash Con e . rain r (dumpsfer) Areas -Trash container (dumpst8r) areas shall have draiaage'from adjoining roofs and paverrlents diverted around the area(s), and: a. Dum sters shall , p all be leak proof and have. attached workable covers.. b. Trash container areas are- to be screened -or walled to prevent offsite transport of trash_ S7. Self-contained Areas for Vehicle WaShing/Steam Cleaning/ Maintenance/Repair/ Material Processing = Self- contained areas are required for washirig/steam cleaning, ' wet material processing, and maintenance activities, specifically: a. For businesses where washing -of vehicles. without steam cleaning occurs, provide wash racks constructed in. accordance with local sewering agency guidelines or btber acceptable standard and with' the prior. approval of the sewermi agency (Note; Discharge monitoring may be required by the sewering agency). b. Where steam cleaning occurs provide wash racks as in S7.a or structurally contain (with a cover to restrict the entry of stormwater during rain events) runoff from such areas onsite for coliunercial waste removal. C, Where wet material .processing occurs (e.g., electroplating), secondary, containment structures shall be provided to hold spills resulting from accidents,; ^or equiipmen o= anf "other uirijiTanried releasers (Note: If these" are;_ plumbed to the sanitary sewer; the structures and plumbing shall be in accordance 'with State and local spill containment and reporting requireinents and have the prior approval of the sewering agency). Also see N10. d_ Where vehicle repair/maintenance occurs, impermeable berms,. drop inlets, trench ' catch basins, or overflow containment structures shall be provided around repair bays to prevent spilled materials and wash -down waters from entering the steam drain system, S8. Outdoor Storage _ 'Where a plan of development proposes or building plans incorporate outdoor containers of oils, fuels, solvents, coolants, wastes, and other.chemieals, the areas where these materials are to be used or stored must be protected by secondary contai=ent structures such as a berm, dike, or curb (see'N1 0). For commercial outdoor vehicle and equipment salvage yards, and commercial outdoor recycling, the entire • storage area shall drain through water quality inlets (see SP I). 'AUG 12 2003 11:07 FR PSOMAS 714 545 8883 TO WESI LH UrF-IUE t'.14 S9. Motor Fuel Concrete Dispensing Areas -,Areas used for fuel dispensing shall be paved with concrete (use of asphalt prohibited).. Concrete surfacing must extend a minimum ' of S' from the face )side of each pump receptacle and 4' from,the nose of the pump island. In addition,'the fuel dispensing area shall be graded and constructed so as to prevent drainage flow through the concrete fueling area. . S10. Motor-Fuel Dispensing Area Canopy - All motor fuel concrete dispensin(i areas are to -have a canopy structure. Canopy roof downspouts are to be roused to prevent drainage across the concrete fueling area. S1 I: Energy Dissipaters - Energy dissfpators, such as riprap, are to be installed at the outlets of new storm drains which enter unlined channels in accordance with applicable. agency specifications. S12. Catch Basiii Stenciling - Phrase `°No Dumping - Only Rain in the Drain" of equally effective phrase as approved by the County /City NPI)ES Advisory Committee is to be stenciled on catch basins to alert the public as to the destination of,•pollutants discharged into stormwater. S13. Diversion of Below Grade Loading Dock Drainage - Below grade loading docks for grocery. stores and czar ehouse /distn`bution centers of fresh food items will drain through water quality inlets (see SPI), or to 'an engineered infiltration system, or an equally effective alternative, S14. Inlet Trash Racks —Where appropriate to reduce intake and transport through the storm drain system of large floatable debris, trash racks shall be provided where drainage from open areas enters storm drains (Caltraas Standard Plan D96 and D98 -C, or equivalent). 4.3 _.Special Structural SMPs SP1. Water Quality Inlets - Water Quality Inlets designed to remove free phase liquid petroleum compounds, grease, floatable debris and settleable solids can be used in the foDowing applications: No's, S7, SS; and S13. 5.0 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAWFOR DEVELOPERS AND CONTRACTORS The following defines the required educational program for developers and contractors in response to the Riverside County DAMP(S); . This DAM' Supplement "A" with its attachments will contain the legal, administrative, and technical information needed to acquaint developers and contractors with the NPDES program. Riverside County developers and contractors have been implementing erosion control plans for many years and are familiar with that portion of the program: New requirements resulting from the NPDES Permir and the DAMP are contained herein. 9 • 'RUG le LIUW J 1 1 : a8 FR PSOMAS 714 545 eee3 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.15 It is, Therefore; recommended that the Building Indt tay Association and the Associated Geiieral Contractors be asked to use Their newsletters to alert their members of the information conizined in this Supplement The Supplement te)-t wiii be made available'by the County and Cities as part of the development review process.. 10 d • TAOLE 1 APPROPRIATENf)- !gTMII. -TFMAN 2 n 6 6 a z z U C 3 x T A UI A UI co m m W O fr, N r JD O T T. rr T • C R G • i Q TABLE Z `� ROUTINE STRUCTURAL BMPs oUllna ruG Ufa g' Q 'gntrol of Impervious Runoff :ommon Area Elficfen( I'd a(fon - •ommon Area ;unoff•Mlnlmizln Landscape PT—MY-91hr Car Wash Racks reeh WalerConl►ola For Lod Preparallon Areas 'as lelner (Dumpeter) Areas olr Conlelned Arose for— Wash Innn, ni___._ — X —X X • a n uslr a at pe eatueran s T Center Warehouae /OroCe Us $pens ng' a c e epa r z Maintenance m X X X X 0 3 —_" ---- X X m X X X �:l .X • R Dior Fuel Concrete Dls en olor Fuel Dispensing Area !er Dfssl ators itch Dasln Slendllw vorelon of Loarlln., X X X. OTC; Special s es. prat 9MPs such Be water quallty Inlets may be r qulred.for lndlvldual prdlecte, such ea s l runoff Issues. Please refer to the Supplement text for addltlon I information. qulpment selvage yards, the! may have unique slorm walcr 73/05 Ln A cn m m m W 0 E m m r D O n n m z .HUU 1C e0wJ 11:08 rK HSUMRS 714 545 8883 TO WEST LA OFFICE P.18 SANTA ANA WATERSHED NPDES PERMITTEES City of Beaumont, City �of Calimesa City of Canyon*L•akes City of Corona City, of Hemet City of Lake Elsinore City of Moreno Valley Ciry ofNorc Ciry of Penis tic Ciry of Riverside,__ County ofRia�eiside: City -of Sari Jacinto ' Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District* SANTA MARGARITA WATERSHED NPDES PERM17TEES Ciry ofMunieta Ciry_ of Temecula_ _ Cotmty ofRivetside Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District* i xEYVAT- EB�4IA�TFRS1j n E_ PDESpERmrjT_- EE_.&q Ciry of Banning ' Cathedral City Ciry of Coachella City of Desert Hot Springs Ciry of Indian Wells Ciry of Indio Ciry of La Quinta Ciry of Palm. Desert Ciry of Palm Spring- 'Ciry of R.ancho.Mirage Coachella Valley Water District* County of Rl verside" Riverside Counry )�7ood Control aid Water Consetvatiad Districts ' Principal Pcrmittce ** TOTAL PAGE . 1 8 *,* SUMMARY OF THE HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR THE • CITY OF LA QUINTA 1-n o N L "r Co`" 12 • • There are five major drainage areas draining to their corresponding retention basins. Area 1 (hole 16) draining to Basin 1 Area 2 (draining to Basin 2 Area 3 (hole 4) draining -to B- asin --3 Area 4 (holes 2, 3) draining to Basin 4E Area 4 (holes 2, 3) draining to Basin 4W Area 5 (hole 1) draining to Basin 5 The basin volume and depth versus volume are shown in the following pages. In the analysis, percolation rate was taken at 1 inch per hour. Area Basin Basin Capacity Inflow (acre -feet) Depth (feet) WSEL (feet) Al 1 7.9 11.12 6.27 48.27 A2 2 83.5 1.25 0.44 32.44 A3 3 14.5 0.77 1.26 35.36 A4 4 (W) 10.6 4.67 6.58 32.58 4 (E) 13.3 3.39 5.15 27.15 A5 5 27.4* 15.54 2.59 35.59 * Storm flow inudates lake EXISTING BASIN The runoff from East La Quinta system discharges directly into La Quinta Evacuation Channel (LQEC) via the existing 60" RCP buried pipe shown as.line "A" or overspill into the large detention basin in the development. This basin has capacity of 520 acre -feet below elevation 59. An additional 20 acre -feet of detention storage is available at a location southeast of the large basin. The inflow upstream of the 20 acre -foot basin is 1775 cfs. To the east of the 20 acre -foot basin there is a dual 90" RCP, which brings additional flow toward the large existing basin. The flow upstream of the 90" RCP is 1180 cfs. THE I K LI IUN PROPO BASIN 1 - HOLE 16 RAgIN rHARArTFRI:STI(;S CONTOUR DEPTH INCR TOTAL AREA sf VOLUME INCR TOTAL cult. cult acre -ft 42 0 . 9893. 0 0.0 2 34618. 44 2 42034 34618 0.8 2 117899 46 4 75865 152517 3.5 2 191473 48 6 115608 343990 7.9 1 131891 49 7 148174. 475881 10.9 Weir overflow C contour 48 Overflow directed to Basin #5 • THE TR'/&ION • PROPOSED BASIN 2 DRIVING RANGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS CONTOUR DEPTH INCR TOTAL AREA sf VOLUME [NCR TOTAL.- cult cult acre -ft . 32 - 0 19044 0 0.0 2 84365 34 2 107504 84365 1 1.9. 2 266112 36 4 158608 350477 8.0 2 3'68666 38 6 210058 719143 16.5 2 472.662 40 8 262604 1191805 27.4 2 603039 42 10 340435. 1794844 41.2 2 795020 44 12. 454585 2589864 59.5 2 1048041 46 14 5934561 36379051 83.5 • l THE TFMTION • PROPOWD BASIN 3 = HOLE 4 . BASIN CHARACTERISTICS CONTOUR DEPTH INCR JOTAL AREA sf VOLUME INCR -TOTAL cult cuft acre -ft 34 — .0 689 0 0.0 2 26270 36. 2 38716 26270 0.6 2 145689 38 4 106973 171959 3.9 2 273665 40 6' 1666921 445624 10.2 1 186709 41 7 206726 6323331 14.5. 0 PROPO,* BASIN 4 (EAST).- HOLES 2 & 3 oncJKI rlUADAt`TCDic-rif`C r CONTOUR. DEPTH INCR* TOTAL AREA sf VOLUME INCR TOTAL cult cult acre -ft 22 0 3033 0 0.0 2 . 13919 .. . 24 2 17845 . 13919 0.3 2 53202 26 4 35357 67121 1.5 2 93695 28 6 58338 160816 33 2 159567 30 8 101229 320383 7.4 21 1 258073 32 10 156844 578456 13.3. • THE TR TION • PROPOMD BASIN 4 (WEST) - HOLES 2 & 3 • BASIN CHARACTERISTICS CONTOUR DEPTH INCR TOTAL AREA sf VOLUME INCR TOTAL . cuft CA acre -ft 26 0 .1367 0 0.0 2 10284 28 2 14059 1.0284 0.2 2 42319 30 4 28260 .52603 1.2 2 75270 32 6 47010 127873 2.9 2 125486 34 - 8 78476. 253359 5.8. 1.5 208367 35.5 9.51 1.99346-1 4617261 10.6 THE TR TION • PROPb BASIN 5 - HOLE 1 BASIN CHARACTERISTICS CONTOUR DEPTH INCR TOTAL AREA sf VOLUME INCR TOTAL cuft cult acre -ft 33 0 166150 0 0.0 1 125762 34 1 211.136 125762 2.9 2 472676 36 3 261540. .598438 117 2 593424 38 5 - 331884 1191862 27.4 BASIN A YS.IS SOUTH TWIN - HOLES 7 & 8 EXISTING BASIN •. PROPOSED BASIN a CONTOUR DEPTH INCREMENT (cuyd):' TOTAL (cuyd) (acre -ft) CONTOUR DEPTH' : INCREMENT (cuyd). TOTAL (cuyd) (acre -ft) 35 0 - 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 36 1 7,212 7,212. 4 36 1 12,840 12,840 8 38. 3 44,626 51,838 32 38 3 47,824 60,664 38 40 5 .54,236 106,074 66 40 5 63,830 124,494 77 .42 7 58,674 164,748 102 42 7 59,894 184,388 114 44 9 62,190 226,938 141 44 9' 64,129 248,517 154. 46 11 65,673 292,611 181 46 11 67,870 316,387 196 48 13 68,531 361,142 224. i'48 13-- 71,129 q87,516 240 50 15 71,241 432,383 268 50 15 74,306 461,822 286 52 17 731879 506,262 314 52 17 78,675. 540,497 335 54 19 76,580 582,842 361 54 19 83,451 623,948 387 56 21 79,384 662,226 410 56 21 87,006 710,954 441 58 23 82,059 744,285 461 58 23 90,126 801,080 497 59 24 42;371 786,656 488. 59 241 45,863 846,943 525 60 25 42,371 829,027 51411 601 251 47,8571 894,800 555 TRADITIO .BASIN ANALYSIS WEIR BASIN EXISTING BASIN P PROPOSED BASIN • CONTOUR DEPTH. 0 SUMMARY OF FEMA ISSUES FOR THE LA QUINTA FLOODPLAIN January 6, 2004 General The effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the City of La Quinta in the area between Avenues 50 and 52 and east of Washington Street is based upon hydrologic and hydraulic calculations performed by Bechtel between 1987 and 1990. The hydrologic calculations assumed that the entire La Quinta Cove area drains toward Washington Street. The effective FIRM is therefore based on a 100 -year peak flow of 1,540 cfs. Hydrology Currently the Crystal Canyon Detention Basin accepts the flows south of Calle Sonora. The effective FIRM 100 -year flows are based on a larger drainage area than currently drains to the subject floodplain, .therefore the effective floodplain is likely to be overstated. The projected outflow of the Crytal Canyon Detention Basin should be- ,,evaluated to�-see if the net 100 -year flow could be reduced. Hydraulics Although the effective FIRM designates the flood hazard as Zone A, the hazard boundary is based on hydraulic calculations using representative cross sections in the area. By •• retrieving the flood insurance study backup data we have determined the floodplain elevations for the Zone A boundary is based. If specific individual structures for the area are in question, we can make a determination if the finish floor elevation of the structure is higher than the effective water surface elevation. If this is the case, it would the most straightforward basis for revising the floodplain. 0 .J ,..r... 9, � . 1 J • • REP LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET BY 100 -YEAR FLOOD �I ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. 1000 0 1000 ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); base flood elevations determined. ZONE AO ' Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flood- Ing, velocities also determined. - NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAMI ZONE A99 To be protected from 100 -year flood by WIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1ll1111111111111 II Federal flood protection system under construction; no base elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood 'with velocity hazard (wave action); no base flood elevations deter- mined. F I. nan ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave'' 'I D action); base flood elevations determined.- FLOOD. INSURANCE RATE MAP aFLOODWAY 0 AREAS IN ZONE AE LES AVENUE OTHER FLOOD AREAS r .; . ,,..._ ZONE X Areas- of -500 -.year flood; areas of II CITY OF - :. • � .• 1 ,flood• with av depths 00 sear average of less than 7. foot or with drainage i ilji il'i' I f LAaa.QUNTAI .- . _ .. . areas less than 1 squaze mile;'and . areas by levees from 100 - CALIFORNIA w protected year flood, RIVERSIDE COUNTY Q OTHER AREAS � ' ;: �;�q. ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500- � ti year flood plain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are s; y ply° r •. undetermined. tuP�kkSfYrTvbyY ' ;`� PANEL S OF 1 O Flood Boundary NOT PRINTED) .(SEE MAP'INDEX FOR PANELS Ii4 Floodway. Boundary .. w�;- — 4 — Zone D Boundary ,•::`.zi,.Y55' »'•' •:r.;., "sai'.i'? " -yJ, > Boundary Dividing Special Flood .$IF v Hazard Zones, and Boundary Dividing Areas of Different r , tea s r ,ydrtm s` rti�n "at >O G X111 f "D ASBY1c,1ttrc�s r2ti �', , '- ¢Tll��s Coastal Base Flood Elevations- Within Special Flood. Hazard P ?::+,1,•,,,'„iiZ.�i>f:{ rir tltr" yN'e 1 ,tt'�'4h'r. a, 43 t- �+y„� � � *i 21'� 1 �y "'.47 i ^r S4'a. t y��f a• ^4 Zones. t °Ct'rt 3 S �1't Y'� � � HrirY[d t..r' 4' r t 5 t s-` .,y i til 4iW d ,s F Jl •1y tot f,ii }{}lhYl' ..' 4 ]^ ,Jyl ! - I^x Sr _ y� _e�i {..� Base Flood Elevation Line; _Ele- . FtVtl -.l ''Rrt{ 513 vation-in Feet* PANEL LOCATION Cross Section Line Base Flood Elevation in Feet COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER (EL 987) Where Uniform Within Zone* 060709 0005 B �c• .. �.r,;.7y�,'�r f, +.v ,vy .,r, m;., ,:�!L':y^�% �p,'���'�t�>;rt k >''' RM7X Elevatidn Reference Mark l� ej5t , ,L j, , ;ate• MAP REVISED: *Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 AUGUST 19, 1991 NOTES t pi '` � ' VIA,' Is map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance s t TRANOF11LL0 ' Rogram. it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, rticularly from local drainage sources of small size, or all planimetric , o I features outside S pecial Flood Hazard Areas. •• ZONE X ' �� �� la A%eas of special flood hazard.(100•year flood) include Zones A, A1.30, Federal Emergency Management.Ageney ft� ` r r� T . ? -, �, �,_ AE, AH, AO, A99, V, V1 -30 AND VE. � �yr�C r�'Jb+t ;�':T£3 r' �tS `� t• � �,y?S 1 �,t hs Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas maybe protected by flood control structures. . •- t,,, >,,.SF:;. y� +: ;x`,} -•• Boundaries of the floodways w6re computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on This is an official was extracted copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes r' -° s; <• ''r' 'e''.. iy @> rrA; hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the Federal or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the v q jya ERICrgOnCy Management Agency. title block. For the latest product Information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at wvvw.msc.fema.gov • i •Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 Y � �,.,. , t��; ,� f,_: NOTES 111 rNyi?, rti c {� VIA, Tlhis map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance t+ r ogram; it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, TRANQUILLO APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET ¢. r,r* pprticularly from local drainage sources of small siie ,orallplanimetric fdatures outside Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1000 0' 1000 s S ZONE X Y n Areas of special flood hazard (100 -year flood) include Zones A, A1.30, ttN a x�kVfi ��lc� vr�f }M M At, AH, A0, A99, V, V1 -30 AND VE. Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and rt �£., r��•.ti �a; �,r interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on ` yak hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the Federal �Wl1lllLLlWl NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAMI Emergency Management Agency. II Floodway widths in some areas- may be too narrow to show to scale. Floodway widths are provided in the Flood Insurance Study Report. Coastal base flood elevations apply only landward of the shoreline. FIRM 1� t °` FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP for adjoining map panels see separately printed Map Index ;; MAP REPOSITORY City of Engineering Department F ( 78 -105 Calle Estado, ; _ La Quinta, California 92253 r I `CITY OF _ ` I P available for refer _ T � I (Maps ava• reference only, not for distribution) Q WT LA INITIAL IDENTIFICATION: ' = CALF ®RN A JUNE 19, 1985 FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS: RIVERSIDE COUNTY La Quinta Evacuation Channel FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE: JUNE 19,1985* FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP REVISIONS: PANEL 5 OF 10 Map revised August 19,1991 to change zone designations, to change .(SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) special flood hazard areas, to add special flood hazard areas, to delete sp -6cial flood hazard areas, to change floodway, to update map format an to update cotporate limits. 0 O 100 YEAR FLOOD O CONT4NED IN CHANNEL M PANEL LOCATION r U) COMMUNITY' -PANEL NUMBER 060709 0005 9 T determine If flood insurance is available, contact an insurance agInt or call the National Flood Insurance Program at (800) 638 -6620. t MAP REVISED: AUGUST 19, 1991 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 1000 0' 1000 Federal Emergency Management.Agency W W This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It Cc I I was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes F- N O F or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the ATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at wwmmsc.fema.gov It I a 11 ■ M L V ZONE X APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET W 1000 .0, 1000 C ' (n CALLE F ---- 4 FELIPE X 51 AVENUE I RM109 Z, 0 CALLE MAZATLAN z (n �IIIIIIIIIIIIII NATIONAL FLOOD IN-SURANCE PROGRAM) �t� V FKEY TO STREETS so I �t� V FKEY TO STREETS � n l ROOORM INSURANCE RATE MAP' —CALLE k GUAYMAJ — AVE IDA NARINJA AVENIDA LA JARITA II ZONE X CITY .OF -,LA QUINTA, CALEFORNIA RIVERSIDE COUNTY PANEL 5 OF 10 JSEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) .7 PANEL LOCATION .COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 060709 0005 B MAP REVISED: AUGUST 19, 1991 Federal Emergency Management Agency This is an alticial copy We portion otthe above referenced flood map. It was extracted using F-M IT On -line. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.govj GeoPentech Memorandum To: William Whittenberg CC: Ken Susilo From: Eric Fordham Date: 12/17/03 Re: La Quinta Percolation Tests Purpose: To obtain percolation estimates for various soil types prevalent within storm water retention • basins within the City of La Quinta. Objective: Conduct large diameter infiltrometer tests to characterize percolation rates for various soil types and statistically analyze results to identify variability in percolation rates for given soil types and between differing soil types. Utilize direct measurements of percolation rates in retention basins, if possible. Compare results of infiltrometer tests to percolation rates estimated for retention basins. Methods: Large diameter infiltrometer tests will be conducted in accordance with the procedures developed by Bouwer, et al., 1997, as follows: 1. Steel cylinders 2 feet in diameter by 1 to 1.5 feet long with a beveled edge is driven straight down into the ground about 3 to 4 inches and soil is packed against the inside and outside of the cylinder to get good soil - cylinder contact. 1 Predicting Infiltration and Ground Water Mounding for Artificial Recharge; Bouwer, H., Back, J. and Oliver, J., October 1997. 14 December 17, 2003 • 2. Water is poured into the cylinder avoiding soil erosion to fill the cylinder to the top and clock time is recorded. 3. The water is allowed to drop about 2 to 4 inches, the drop is measured, clock time is recorded, and the cylinder.is filled back up to the top. 4. This is repeated for about 6 hours or until accumulated infiltration has reached about 20 inches, whichever comes first. 5. The last drop of the water level is measured and the clock time is recorded. 6. A shovel or backhoe is used to dig outside the cylinder and through the total depth of the wetted soil to measure the lateral and vertical spreading of wetting. At least 3 and preferably 5 large- diameter infiltrometer tests should be conducted for each soil type identified in each basin that will be part of the study. Retention basins expecting to receive sufficient storm water flow so as to form a pool within the 'basin can also be tested to estimate their percolation rate. The filling of the basin needs to be the result of a discrete flow that fills the basin followed by a period of no flow where drops in pool level are due to evaporation and percolation. Basins that receive continuous flow as a result of return flow from irrigation or from other sources would require accurate flow measurements using a weir or other comparable device. The level that the pool drops would be measured with a pressure transducer and data logging system located at a secure site within the basin. Water • level measured with the transducer /data logger would be correlated to a rating table for the basin that relates surface elevation in the basin to volume. Multiple cycles of filling and percolation are preferred to obtain long -term percolation rates that may be sustainable in the event of a wetter than normal rainfall year. • 100 Foot Intervals 1000 Foot Intervals DRAFT FOR INF I 1 4Q VIEW City of La Quinta "FEMA Flood Zones" 0 1 2 4 Miles r maw, a .T \ I 1' I .1 I --�. 4\ i I iii . Vwm rt J � n K Al - o; i" xx ki w. 0 ra 1 :RX, m � I 4, Zj_ > q fi +� S n a � W.. on MEN awl" i � n K Al - o; i" xx ki w. 0 ra 1 :RX, m � I 4, Zj_ > q fi +� S n a � W.. on MEN awl" e. , ...� <,.. MW ,, F, 3 .. im Awn dw City of La Quinta W E 0 1 250 215-0-0 5 000 7 500 10 000 ff Feet S Vwm rt J e. , ...� <,.. MW ,, F, 3 .. im Awn dw City of La Quinta W E 0 1 250 215-0-0 5 000 7 500 10 000 ff Feet S a� C] City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan Table of Contents (Draft) ES. Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction Ordinances 1.1 Scope of Study 1.2 Description of Study Area 1.2.1 Location 1.2.2 Geography and Watersheds 1.2.3 Existing Land Use 1.2.4 Hydrology and Climate 1.2.5 Infrastructure Summary 2.0 Planning and Design Criteria 2.1 Ordinances 2. 1.1 FEMA 2:1.2 RCFCWCD 2.1.3 City of La Quinta 2.2 Design Criteria (and assumptions) 2.3 Percolation Rates 3.0 Existing Condition Assessment • 3.1 Existing Facilities 3.1.1 Off -site Facilities 3.1.1.1 Bear Creek System 3.1.1.2 East La Quinta System 3.1.1.3 La Quinta North Diversion 3.1.1.4 La Quinta Evacuation Channel 3.1.2 On -site Facilities 3.2 Existing FEMA Issues 4.0 Proposed Remedial Action/Projects 4.1 Proposed Facilities 4.2 Ultimate Runoff Conveyance 4.3 Proposed FEMA Condition 4.4 Water Quality 4.5 Alternatives 5.0 Capital Improvement 5.1 Estimated Capital Costs 5.2 Funding Sources 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 6.1 Discussion of City Risk • 6.2 Recommended Implementation Schedule 1� W. 7.0 References • • Appendices A. Drainage Maps — Existing Condition B. Drainage Maps — Proposed Condition C. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations — Existing Condition D. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations — Proposed Condition E. Percolation Test Results