CC Resolution 2014-059 SilverRock MNDRESOLUTION NO. 2014 — 059
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADDENDUM
TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO.2002-453 (SCH
NO. 1999081020) AND ADDENDUM NO. 2006-568,
FOR SILVERROCK RESORT
CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-1003
APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2002, the Board of the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of La Quinta approved Mitigated Negative 'Declaration of Environmental
Impact and Environmental Assessment No.2002-453, State Clearinghouse
Number 1999081020 (the "MND"), for the acquisition of approximately 707 acres
generally located north of Avenue 54, west of Jefferson Street, south of
Avenue 52, and east of the Coral Reef Mountains (the "Ranch") and the
subsequent development of the non -mountainous portion of the Ranch with public
golf courses and resort uses (the "Ranch Project"); and,
WHEREAS, a Notice of Determination for the MND was filed on May 16,
2002. There are no changed circumstances, conditions, or new information, which
would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to
Public Resources Code section 21 166 in connection with the Project; and,
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2006, the City Council of the City of La Quinta
approved an Addendum No. 2006-568 to Mitigated Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact and Environmental Assessment No. 2002-453, for the
SilverRock Resort Specific Plan, which plan establishes development plans,
guidelines and regulations for the development of a golf course, hotel resort
facilities and supporting commercial uses, including a Water Supply Assessment
and Water Supply Verification, and which Specific Plan area is located on a 546-
acre portion of the Ranch, generally bordered by Avenue 52 on the north, Avenue
54 on the south, Jefferson Street on the East, and the Santa Rosa Mountains on
the west; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 141h day of October, 2014, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and
Environmental Assessment No. 2002-453 and Addendum No. 2006-568, and after
hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did unanimously adopt
Resolution No.2014-059
Environmental Assessment 2014-1003
City of La Quinta — SilverRock Resort
Adopted: November 4, 2014
Page 2 of 4
Planning Commission Resolution 2014-025, recommending to the City Council
approval of said Addendum; and,
WHEREAS, an Addendum (Exhibit "A") has been prepared and it has
determined that the Project does not trigger the need for the preparation of an
additional or subsequent environmental assessment pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guideline section 15162 or Public Resources
Code section 21166, in that the Project does not involve:
1. Substantial changes to the project analyzed in the MND and previous
Addendum which would involve new significant effects on the environment
or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts;
2. Substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on
the environment not analyzed in the MND and previous Addendum; or
3. New information of substantial importance which would involve new
significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the MND and previous
Addendum substantially increase the severity of previously identified
impacts;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department did publish a public
hearing notice in the Desert Sun newspaper, on the 24th day of October, 2014, as
prescribed by the Municipal Code, with public hearing notices mailed to all property
owners within 500 feet of the SilverRock Resort property. The Addendum is a
public document and is available for review at the Community Development
Department at La Quinta City Hall; and,
WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if
any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the
following findings to justify approval of said Addendum to Mitigated Negative
Declaration of Environmental Impact and Environmental Assessment No. 2002-453
and Addendum 2006-568:
1. The Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare
of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant
unmitigated impacts were identified by the MND and Addendums.
2. The Project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered
Resolution No.2014-059
Environmental Assessment 2014-1003
City of La Quinta — SilverRock Resort
Adopted: November 4, 2014
Page 3 of 4
plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory in that no significant effects on environmental
factors have been identified by the MND and Addendums.
3. There is no evidence before the City that the Project will have the potential
for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the
wildlife depends in that in that no significant effects on environmental
factors have been identified by the MND and Addendums.
4. The. Project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental
goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no
significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the MND
and Addendums.
5. The Project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or
cumulatively considerable. when considering planned or proposed
development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area
will not be significantly affected by the Project.
6. The Project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the
human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have
been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public
services.
7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the Project
may have a significant effect on the environment in that mitigation measures
are imposed on the Project that will reduce impacts to a less than significant
level.
8. The City Council has considered the MND and Addendums and said MND
and Addendums reflects the independent judgment of the City.
9. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption
of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d).
10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the
Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La
Quinta, California, 92253.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La
Quinta, California, as follows:
Resolution No.2014-059
Environmental Assessment 2014-1003
City of La Quinta — SilverRock Resort
Adopted: November 4, 2014
Page 4 of 4
SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the City Council approving and Addendum to Environmental Assessment
2002-453 and Addendum 2006-568;
SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of La Quinta hereby approves the
Addendum (Exhibit "A") to Environmental Assessment 2002-453 and Addendum
2006-568 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution;
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of La Quinta held this 4th day of November, 2014, by the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Osborne, Mayor Adolph
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
DON ADOLPH, Mbj or
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
SUSAN MAYSELS, Ci Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(CITY SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
Prepared For:
City of La Quinta
Community Development Department
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
SilverRock Resort Project
Addendum to the Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration
Meridian We0stlake Village, CA 91361 Hampshire Road, Suite P
Consulmnts (805) 367-5720 FAX (805) 367-5733
OCTOBER 2014
Addendum
to the
Adopted Mitigated
Negative Declaration
for the
SilverRock Resort Project
Prepared for:
City of La Quinta
Community Development Department
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
Prepared by:
Meridian Consultants, LLC
860 Hampshire Road, Suite P
Westlake Village, California 91361
October 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................1.0-1
1.1 Purpose of an Addendum...........................................................................................................1.0-2
2.0 Project Description....................................................................................................................................2.0-1
2.1 Project Location..........................................................................................................................2.0-1
2.2 Project Characteristics................................................................................................................2.0-2
2.3 Development Time Frame...........................................................................................................2.0-7
3.0 Impact Analysis..........................................................................................................................................3.0-2
3.1 Land Use and Planning................................................................................................................3.0-2
3.2 Population and Housing..............................................................................................................3.0-6
3.3 Geologic and Soils.......................................................................................................................3.0-7
3.4 Water........................................................................................................................................3.0-12
3.5 Air Quality.................................................................................................................................3.0-18
3.6 Transportation/Circulation.......................................................................................................3.0-26
3.7 Biological Resources..................................................................................................................3.0-31
3.8 Energy and Mineral Resources..................................................................................................3.0-39
3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials............................................................................................3.0-41
3.10 Noise.........................................................................................................................................3.0-46
3.11 Public Services...........................................................................................................................3.0-53
3.12 Utilities and Service Systems.....................................................................................................3.0-58
3.13 Aesthetics..................................................................................................................................3.0-66
3.14 Cultural Resources....................................................................................................................3.0-70
3.15 Recreation.................................................................................................................................3.0-73
3.16 Greenhouse Gases....................................................................................................................3.0-75
4.0 References.................................................................................................................................................4.0-1
Appendices
A AQ and GHG Emissions Calculations
List of Figures
Figure Page
1.0-1 Existing Master Plan for Specific Plan Area...............................................................................1.0-5
2.0-1 Regional Location Map..............................................................................................................2.0-8
2.0-2 Local Location Map....................................................................................................................2.0-9
2.0-3 Updated Master Plan for Specific Plan Area............................................................................2.0-10
List of Tables
Table Page
2.0-1
Project Land Use Summary........................................................................................................2.0-2
3.1-1
Statistical Comparison of Approved Specific Plan and Updated Master Plan...........................3.0-5
3.5-1
Highest Daily Construction Pollutant Emissions......................................................................3.0-25
3.5-2
Operational Emissions.............................................................................................................3.0-25
3.5-3
LST Emissions...........................................................................................................................
3.0-27
3.16-1
Construction GHG Emissions...................................................................................................3.0-83
3.16-2
Operational GHG Emissions.....................................................................................................3.0-84
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Addendum has been prepared to analyze the potential environmental effects of agreements
proposed to implement the approved SilverRock Resort Specific Plan ("SilverRock Project" or "Specific
Plan"). The City of La Quinta ("City") is proposing to enter into a Purchase, Sale, and Development
Agreement and a Development Agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864 et
seq., with a master developer for development of resort, recreational, retail/commercial, and residential
uses as permitted by the Specific Plan ("Proposed Agreements" or "Modified Project").
In 2002, the City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency acquired the Specific Plan Area with the primary
objectives of (1) providing public recreation opportunities with the development of two public golf
courses, and (2) facilitating the development of resort residential and associated commercial uses that
would generate a recurring revenue source for the City. An Environmental Assessment (EA 2002-453)
was completed evaluating this proposal, and a mitigated negative declaration ("MND") was adopted,
which is referred to in this document as the "2002 MND." The project analyzed in the 2002 MND is
referred to herein as the "2002 MND Project."
The City began implementation of the Specific Plan and constructed and opened an 18-hole municipal
golf course, the Arnold Palmer Classic Course at SilverRock Resort, in March 2005. This golf course
occupies approximately 200 acres, or one-third of the Specific Plan Area. The City adopted the Specific
Plan to guide the future development of the remainder of the Specific Plan Area in 2006. An Addendum
to the 2002 MND ("2006 Addendum"), was prepared that evaluated the modifications to the 2002 MND
Project. The modified 2002 MND Project analyzed in the 2006 Addendum is referred to herein as the
"2006 Addendum Project."
The Specific Plan was adopted by the City to ensure quality development consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the City of La Quinta General Plan. The Specific Plan defines the location, type,
and amount of development allowed within the Specific Plan Area, while providing a degree of flexibility
to allow future development to respond to the opportunities in the marketplace for a unique resort
development. The Specific Plan includes development plans, guidelines, and regulations for the Specific
Plan Area, along with maximum densities, intensities, and development standards, and included the
Illustrative Master Plan shown in Figure 1.0-1, Existing Master Plan for the Specific Plan Area.
The Proposed Agreements would provide for the development of resort uses, including hotels, a spa,
residential units, a mixed -use village, and a civic park/entertainment area on a portion of the remaining
undeveloped Specific Plan Area.
The uses included in the Modified Project are permitted by the Specific Plan.
The approved Specific Plan allows minor modification without a Specific Plan amendment as follows:
• The addition of new information to the Specific Plan maps or text that do not change the effect of
any regulation. The new information may include more detailed, site -specific information. If this
information demonstrates that Planning Area boundaries are inaccurately designated, based upon
the goals of the Specific Plan, said boundaries may be adjusted or redesignated to reflect a more
accurate depiction of on -site conditions without requiring a Specific Plan Amendment. Adjustments
to the golf corridors may be made, resulting in a corresponding change to the adjacent development
parcel, without the requirement of a Specific Plan Amendment.
• Changes to the community infrastructure, such as drainage systems, roads, water and sewer
systems, etc., which that do not have the effect of increasing or decreasing capacity in the project
area beyond the specified density range nor increase the backbone infrastructure construction or
maintenance costs.1
The proposed Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement will allow the master developer to construct
the Project. The Development Agreement will vest the master developer's right to develop the Modified
Project and will provide additional public benefits to the City. The agreements are both discretionary
actions.
1.1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and State CEQA Guidelines define standards and the
procedure for determining the level of additional environmental review required when an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified or a Negative Declaration adopted for a project.2
An Addendum to an adopted MND is appropriate where the lead agency has determined that changes
to the project, changed circumstances, or new information would not result in the identification of new
significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts identified in the adopted MND. An
Addendum is appropriate where a lead agency has determined that none of the conditions described in
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 call for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have
occurred.
Public review of an Addendum is not required by CEQA. Instead, the information in an Addendum is to
be considered with the adopted MND prior to a decision being made on actions proposed.
1 City of La Quinta, SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (2006), 51.
2 CEQA Guidelines, sec. 15162-15164.
This Addendum provides:
1. An update to the information in the adopted MND for the SilverRock Project on the existing
environmental conditions within the Specific Plan Area and in the City of La Quinta.
2. An analysis of the potential environmental effects of the development that would be permitted by
the Proposed Agreements as compared to the environmental effects of the development analyzed
in the 2002 MND.
An Addendum is the appropriate document to update the information in the adopted MND for the
following reasons:
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the SilverRock Project that will require major revisions of
the adopted MND because there are no new significant effects or any substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant impacts.
2. No substantial changes in circumstances under which the SilverRock Project will be undertaken
have been identified that will require major revisions of the adopted MND as there are no new
significant environmental effects or any substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
effects.
3. No new information of substantial importance has been discovered that was not known and could
not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the adopted MND was
prepared. Specifically, a review of the current existing conditions and the SilverRock Project
demonstrates the following:
a. The SilverRock Project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
adopted MND.
b. Significant effects previously examined will not be substantially more severe than shown in
the adopted MND.
c. No new mitigation measures or alternatives have been found to be feasible that would reduce
one or more significant effects of the SilverRock Project.
d. No new mitigation measures or alternatives, considerably different from those analyzed in the
adopted MND, have been identified that the Project proponents decline to adopt.
This Addendum provides updated information and analysis of the environmental effects of developing
the SilverRock Project under the Proposed Agreements as compared to the development analyzed in the
2002 MND Project. The consistency of the SilverRock Project with the La Quinta 2035 General Plan,
adopted in February 2013, is also provided, along with updates to other City, State, or local rules,
regulations, and ordinances.
2002 MND Project
The 2002 MND assessed the environmental effects of the City acquiring and developing the
approximately 707-acre Project site. It was anticipated that the City would subsequently adopt a Specific
Plan and approve related actions to implement the 2002 MND Project, including the subdivision of the
site and the issuance of permits for individual development projects. Approximately 160 acres of the
707-acre site, consisting of a portion of the Santa Rosa Mountains, was preserved as natural open space.
As described and evaluated in the 2002 MND for the 2002 MND Project, the development program for
the remainder of the site included two 18-hole public golf courses, a 25,000-square foot clubhouse and
a public 9-hole golf course. The resort uses described and evaluated in the 2002 MND included a 250-
room hotel with a 10,000 square foot conference center, 300 timeshare/fractional or condo/hotel units
and 25,000 square feet of supporting retail and commercial uses.
2006 Addendum Project
In 2006 the City prepared the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan and prepared an Addendum to the 2002
MND to update the information and analysis in the 2002 MND to address the Specific Plan. The Specific
Plan permits the development of public golf courses, resort facilities, and supporting retail and
commercial uses in a master -planned resort environment. The Specific Plan established design and
development criteria and permits the development of two high -quality public golf courses (one of which
has since been built) with supporting facilities, a public park, a hotel with a conference center, a resort
hotel, a boutique hotel, a mixed -use resort retail village, and resort casitas. The Specific Plan Area does
not include the 160-acre portion of the Santa Rosa Mountains that was included as a part of the 2002
MND Project site because this portion of the site is preserved as open space. The Specific Plan did not
constitute a substantial change to the 2002 MND Project because the uses and development allowed by
the Specific Plan are substantially similar to the 2002 MND Project.
:4r
r
SOURCE: SilverRock Resort Specific Plan - 2006 FIGURE 1.0-1
r#eridian Existing Master Plan for Specific Plan Area
(onsuftants
066-001-14
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The SilverRock Project is located approximately 105 miles from the City of Los Angeles and
approximately 240 miles from the Phoenix -Scottsdale metropolitan region within the City of La Quinta
("City') in the County of Riverside ("County').
The City is 35.05 square miles and is located in the southeastern portion of the Coachella Valley. The City
is the "last and most southerly 'cove community' in the Coachella Valley, and has evolved along and out
from the coves and foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains."3 The City is bordered by unincorporated
County areas to the north and east and by the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains to the southwest
and west. As shown in Figure 2.0-1, Regional Location Map, surrounding jurisdictions include
unincorporated County areas to the north and east, the City of Palm Desert and the City of Indian Wells
to the northwest, and the City of Indio to the northeast.
The Specific Plan was adopted by the City to guide the development of the 546-acre Specific Plan Area
("Specific Plan Area"). The Specific Plan Area is accessible from Interstate 10 via Jefferson Street. As
shown in Figure 2.0-2, Local Location Map, the Specific Plan Area is located in the central portion of the
City and is bounded by Avenue 52 to the north, Jefferson Street to the east, Avenue 54 on the south,
and the Santa Rosa Mountains on the west. The Coachella Canal, which traverses west from Jefferson
Street and turns south within the Specific Plan Area, bisects the Specific Plan Area.
Surrounding uses include the Citrus golf course and residential community to the north of Avenue 52,
the Hideaway golf club and residential community to the east of Jefferson Street, and the PGA West golf
resort and residential community to the south of Avenue 54. The Santa Rosa Mountains are located to
the west of the Modified Project Site.
Zoning surrounding the Specific Plan Area includes Low Density Residential (RL) to the north, east,
southeast, and west; Open Space (OS) to the southwest and west; and Medium High Density Residential
(RMH) and Medium Density Residential (RM) to the southeast.
The land uses surrounding the Specific Plan Area are golf course and residential communities and
natural open space areas.
3 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan, p. II-35 (2013).
2.2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
As shown in Figure 2.0-3, Updated Master Plan for the Specific Plan Area, the updated Master Plan
illustrates the mix and configuration of uses in the Modified Project. The updated Master Plan for the
Specific Plan Area provides for the development of a resort environment, which includes hotels, boutique
hotels, spas, and other resort -rental and resort -oriented uses.4
Table 2.0-1, Modified Project Land Use Summary, refines the development in 12 planning areas to allow
825 hotel and resort residential units, and approximately 1.4 million square feet within the Specific Plan
Area. The Modified Project results in 310 fewer units, 405 fewer keys, and 125,000 fewer commercial
square feet when compared to what is permitted by the Specific Plan. A minority of the resort
residential units will be available for private ownership. Development proposed for each planning area is
explained in more detail below. While development within the individual Planning Areas is changing as
part of the Modified Project, the overall density and intensity for the Specific Plan Area will not increase.
Table 2.0-1
Modified Project Land Use Summary
Planning
Area
Use
Acres
Units
Square Feet
1
Golf Course & Ancillary Uses
173.0
--
20,000
2
Luxury Hotel and Spa
17.0
140 rooms
166,072
3
Luxury Hotel Branded Residential
14.0
35 residences
94,500
4
Shared Services/Conference Center
12.0
--
70,818
5
Lifestyle Hotel
10.0
200 rooms
169,652
6
Lifestyle Hotel Branded Residential
10.0
60 residences
147,000
7
Promenade Mixed -Use Village Area 1
10.5
150 units
175,000
8
Resort Residential Village
32.0
160 residences
480,000
9
Promenade Mixed -Use Village Area II
15.0
80 units
90,000
10
Public Use Area/Golf Reserve
10a
Phase 1 New Golf Club, Golf Cabins and
64.5
25 units
31,500
Future Holes 1-9
10b
Phase 2 New Golf Club and Holes 10-18
86.5
--
--
11
Park
35.0
--
-
12
Public Use —Trails, Canal, Streets, Parking
45.5
--
--
Total
525.0
850
1,444,942
Source: Meriwether Companies, Statistical Summary — Land Use, SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (September 2014).
4 City of La Quinta, SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (2006).
2.2.1 Planning Area 1
Planning Area 1 consists of approximately 173 acres, including the existing 173.0-acre Arnold Palmer
Classic Golf Course, existing Ahmanson Ranch House on a 1.5-acre parcel, and the 3-acre golf course
maintenance facility site. The existing golf course comprises the majority of Planning Area 1.
New development within Planning Area 1 may include renovation of the Ahmanson Ranch House, a 300-
seat restaurant, up to 10,000 square feet of conference facilities, a community -oriented arts facility, and
other outdoor uses. Portions of the existing 173.0-acre Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course will be
modified because: (1) work will be performed by the Coachella Valley Water District ("CVWD") to
renovate the existing Coachella Canal will impact existing golf features and facilities, which will need to
be restored upon completion of the work on the Canal; and (2) the proposed Luxury Hotel in Planning
Area 2 will displace existing golf hole No. 17, requiring the development of a new hole No. 17 and
modifications to surrounding golf features. On November 19, 2013, an agreement was approved
between the City and the CVWD for the construction of a parallel canal within the Specific Plan Area.
CVWD will be replacing a portion of the existing Coachella Canal within the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf
Course. As of July 15, 2014, CVWD was constructing a parallel canal through the golf course and was
planning to complete the work by September 2014 prior to the redevelopment of the Arnold Palmer
Classic Golf Course.
2.2.2 Planning Area 2
Planning Area 2 consists of 17 acres planned for a 140-unit Luxury Hotel, comprising approximately
170,000 square feet of total interior and exterior space. The Luxury Hotel would include a day spa and
fitness center. There would be approximately 131 parking spaces located near the Luxury Hotel and a
much smaller short-term parking area adjacent to the hotel entry. Valet would be the predominant
parking type because the Modified Project includes predominantly rental -based hotel units rather than
long-term residential units. Parking requirements would be met per the Specific Plan, with opportunities
to reduce the number of spaces consistent with shared parking efficiencies. The Luxury Hotel would be
serviced by a new Shared Services and Conference Center described in Planning Area 4.
2.2.3 Planning Area 3
Planning Area 3 consists of the development of 14 acres planned for 35 single-family detached
residences available for private ownership. It is anticipated these units would be occupied on a seasonal
basis, as is typical for homes in resort communities in the Coachella Valley. The luxury branded
residential units will be privately owned, have a direct relationship with the Luxury Hotel, and could be
made available by the owners for short term rental as resort units. These residences would range in size
from 2,800 to 4,500 square feet, and some of the residential units may include lock -off units. Owners
would be incentivized to rent their homes through a carefully managed program administered by the
hotel. If the owners of these homes wish to make these homes available for rent, they would be
required by covenants to the purchase and sale agreement to do so through the hotel reservation and
management system, to the extent permitted by applicable laws.
2.2.4 Planning Area 4
Planning Area 4 consists of approximately 71,000 air-conditioned and unconditioned square feet and
outdoor areas planned for a Shared Services and Conference Center Building. This facility would be
shared by the Luxury and Lifestyle Hotels and would include a ballroom meeting space, food service
areas, and back -of -house functions. Approximately 300 parking spaces would be included to
accommodate functions managed at the facility and act as overflow parking for the other uses areas
within the Specific Plan Area.
2.2.5 Planning Area 5
Planning Area 5 consists of approximately 10 acres planned for a Lifestyle Hotel, including 200 rooms
and comprising approximately 170,000 square feet. The Lifestyle Hotel would feature 2- and 3-story
buildings and would share some common facilities with the Luxury Hotel, including the spa and fitness
center, conference and meeting area, and back -of -house services. Planning Area 5 would include 220
parking spaces.
2.2.6 Planning Area 6
Planning Area 6 consists of 10 acres planned for 60 single-family attached residences available for
private ownership. It is anticipated these units would be occupied on a seasonal basis, as is typical for
homes in resort communities in the Coachella Valley. These residential units will be privately owned,
and could be made available by the owners for short term rental as resort units. These residences would
range in size from 2,100 to 3,500 square feet. The residential homes would also be designed as rental
units with a lock -off unit, allowing a total capacity of 120 units. If the owners of these homes wish to
make these homes available for rent, they would be required by covenants to the purchase and sale
agreement to do so through the hotel reservation and management system, to the extent permitted by
applicable laws.
2.2.7 Planning Area 7
Please note that Planning Areas 7 and 9 are collectively referred to as the Promenade Mixed Use (MU)
Village.
Promenade MU Village Area 1
Planning Area 7 consists of 10.5 acres proposed for Promenade MU Village Area 1. The village
environment would contain a mix of residential and commercial uses, comprising a combination of
mixed -use, stand-alone, and pop-up retail components. Planning Area 7 would feature two major
circulation elements, the River Walk and the Promenade, with intersecting north —south and east —west
pedestrian corridors having connectivity to vehicular, nonvehicular, and pedestrian circulation routes
within the Specific Plan Area. The River Walk would be a water canal, ranging from 15 to 30 feet in
width, and the Promenade would be a paved corridor connecting SilverRock Way to the existing golf
course lake bordering Planning Area 7.
The residential component consists of a total of 150,000 square feet of livable space for comprising 150
units, including planned lofts and bungalows. The lofts would be 2 to 3 stories in height and average
approximately 1,000 square feet per unit, with retail space on the ground floor of some of the buildings.
The mixed -use ground floor would feature an initial commitment of 4,000 square feet and up to a total
maximum of 16,000 square feet of mixed -use commercial space. The bungalows would be detached and
would average 1,500 square feet per unit. Both the lofts and the bungalows would be designed to rent
frequently.
In addition to a maximum of 16,000 square of mixed -use commercial space, Planning Area 7 is also
planned to include stand-alone and pop-up retail uses. The stand-alone retail space consists of
permanent buildings anchoring key corners and destinations within the pedestrian circulation network.
Pop-up retail spaces are temporary uses occurring in portable or modular facilities, which may feature a
daily or even seasonal duration. Pop-up retail would occur along the two primary pedestrian routes.
2.2.8 Planning Area 8
Planning Area 8 is planned for a Resort Residential Village, featuring 160 units on 32.0 acres located in
the southern portion of the Specific Plan Area. The residential units would range from approximately
2,200 to 4,000 square feet per unit and could include both detached and attached residences. The
residential units would also be interconnected with a central paseo trail system providing connectivity to
a common recreational amenity. The recreational amenity would include a leasing and rental
management office, fitness and recreation facilities, community common area, and an outdoor
swimming pool.
2.2.9 Planning Area 9
Promenade MU Village Area 2
Planning Area 9 is proposed for the 15-acre Promenade MU Village Area 2. Planning Area 9 may be
retained by the City for public park purposes or planned and constructed by the developer. If Planning
Area 9 was developed for public park purposes, it could be developed with passive and active
recreational uses responsive to an inventory of current recreational needs within the City. This park
acreage would be in addition to a 35-acre park designated for Planning Area 11. If Planning Area 9 is
developed by the developer, it is anticipated that it would be in a manner complementary to the mixed
uses in Planning Area 7, including additional public and private recreational uses and amenities.
Commercial uses accessible to the public may include water -oriented recreation with ancillary
entertainment, dining, and retail functions, an agri-tourism component, unique and innovative
"glamping" concepts consistent with the SilverRock setting, residential uses, and additional mixed -use,
stand-alone, and pop-up retail.
2.2.10 Planning Area 10
Planning Area 10 consists of approximately 151.0 acres divided into two subareas, known as Planning
Areas 10a and 10b. The uses in these two subareas include existing golf improvements (the Driving
Range as modified), a permanent golf clubhouse location, and a reservation of land area for possible
future golf improvements.
Planning Area 10a
Planning Area 10a is approximately 64.5 acres and includes three distinct land uses. The first is the
permanent golf clubhouse site located on 6 acres. The 15,000 gross square foot golf clubhouse would be
designed to blend in with the style of the adjacent Lifestyle Hotel and Lifestyle residential component.
Secondly, Planning Area 10a includes the existing driving range for the existing Arnold Palmer Classic
Golf Course. Additionally, 25 golf cabins, approximately 800 square feet in size, would be developed in
this area as transient -oriented units adjacent to the golf clubhouse. Lastly, there are approximately 46.0
acres of public use area, which would be reserved for future golf improvements or other land uses.
Planning Area 10b
Planning Area 10b consists of approximately 86.5 acres of public use land reserved for future golf
improvements or other land uses.
2.2.11 Planning Area 11
Planning Area 11 consists of approximately 35 acres planned for a combination of private and public
community parks, consistent with the Specific Plan. Special events including public parking, automobile
displays, art festivals, and other similar activities are permitted within this Planning Area, subject to a
temporary use permit.
2.2.12 Planning Area 12
Planning Area 12 consists of approximately 45.5 acres planned for existing and infrastructure and
amenity facilities including public and private streets, water well sites, up to 4.5 acres of private trails
with public access easements over, and the existing Coachella Canal.
2.3 DEVELOPMENT TIME FRAME
Construction would occur over time and would consist of several phases, including site preparation
(including clearing, grubbing, and grading), infrastructure construction (including internal street
development, electric, natural gas, and telecommunications improvements), and construction of
individual buildings. No clear building construction timeline is available because the Specific Plan Area
would be built out depending on the market conditions. For purposes of analysis, building construction
and support infrastructure is anticipated to occur over an 8-year timeframe, starting in the first quarter
of 2016.
The first phase of the development, site preparation, is expected to occur over 4 to 6 months. Site
preparation will begin within Planning Areas 2 through 5 and Planning Area 10. Infrastructure
construction within these Planning Areas will occur over two years following completion of site
preparation. Building construction will follow infrastructure construction over the remaining few years.
The second phase of development will begin within the remaining Planning Areas. Site preparation,
infrastructure construction, and construction of individual buildings will follow a similar development
time frame as the first phase of development.
The Modified Project development time frame of 8 years is one year shorter when compared to what
was analyzed for the 2006 Addendum Project.
�
t Itl.l{ � ttill l w[ MDRONG0 ALLEY
COUNTY OF
~€[ol 1 k€
.- SA IV BERNAR011V0
CCUIVTY OF
1J �
RIVERSIDE
f To Los Angeles
C-ESERT
i
HOT S "[CGS
f
PALhi
�1 fir,7
Palm Springs
17ternat;anaI A rpafl
R
AAA
k
1 TT IITN%N 111 HN![.ZI)TXO
THOUSAND PALMS
H EDR L 1
CITY'1�►
ai"RALa� PAL€I Bermuda Dunes
s=SER1 Arpari
1 .
INDIAN
Lou aIr
jacq el: rrrhra
Regiena'i Airport +
i• 7 hrrrrn� Airport) SILVER ROCK RESORT THERNIAL
SPECIFIC PLAN
� a s
RWERSIDE
COi1NTYCIF
f c J SAN DIEGO
SOURCE: Riverside County Data from ArcGis; Meridian Consultants, LLC - July 2014
FIGURE 2.0-1
r#eridian Regional Location Map
066-001-14
.0 rt
y _
I "• .�., 4 V�
#w
,Iy
MV
kLL�
Project Location
tit .. � � ky f�ik .. :. iy,'F•A.,fa,.,,y � •-
i• , y
me.µ
• ... - k • 4 F Yc. - a.' Y 7
p •FY
F- ! s �.�.r.'-�`P a 1`'^ '.ra •r - • f `i
Auk
a
-
_ F� k.
� vs� ra a t ♦ p
-•a
in
�end_ sue,' Is
Project Area
46
I �•�., ithy-g"ar'.(w'i�'y�a]i�*v7a�1 }
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN MILE
LUXURY BRANDEI}
RESIDENTIAL. PA 2
LUXURY IICIITEL
e PARKIN
PA
k I'r PA 5
L �} llpt mot, M 10A
p Fri'104 -OL F (A.UBFif]lJi : ?
'�t' •, �� I . FUNRE �iliF C_0L, ti E - f r� 6
f k LIFESTYLE BRANDED ltL'�F1Rk+L11'UkiL[t USE '
1 PARCEL13 + RESIM IIAL
k + _ J"A I
PARK
5 k
1 <
PA
y
PA ? "= j
S 7 1 `1r FUTIw ; CaC.a11 {''OURSI::M1
I
ZA 2 __ *i its 55 1f FE rAA>CL7:.5
LUXURY I3?]TEL
MIXED -USE VILLAGE T"'
AREr1] LF�Ily
�,LAK CL�dCK • k �� � �I�r m �., �
S G-+
PR4L'f11IwL AD[ &
MIXED -USE USE SU14i1�9 rIKY `
x+.x VILLAGE - AREA II
•de Lxw uu K
rs4
% 4G�kltse{ExtxraxF 7
WFL kk fl-EC k5Pw 17.4 Lap M
# 1.Uw11Y111L1.MIM,11Fj *jNT10LI. 14.11 V RMDKrRESMEEI9TI�hL i ]Tf j S ;ti4`�„ .I 7.
# 5NAFL,W5W1C1SXVNF"k-',< I 'i VILLAGE
1.l6F1'LJf. FlL'L :II.IJ .'.1' r YJ I 4!u IT% .�' !72
d 11IFNI ISYIA RRANIDE } RfMIA 11111 k1.1.0 *41 II
7 rFCLi�IfRArg.?RINEDs. a Lu L:.1 .aKIAI K6 041 .': % '. IL.+7 � .,•51 L',+� '`1 '�`} - 4 - -
Jf 8R`41R'M'kEti"�kipCM11YAL 4'ILLhr-i 3aA1 iiiU t� � Lnu '
9 1", 114..ADC, MWAUI LeSi. VIL.C.+u?.�B It I A q4'
aar rrL,L�1t? I h1w#,;(34,1'ctuan FLLREsa-9 -0:0 r
I r a ri i a4E 1'FIA�I➢�51L�'6{.,LI�IMtLko Lake mil �' + � 'ly ;�`--? '� -
13 PhkK .MT �.
12 avBLLC LSL TRAILS; CANAL. SMELT& ak y{ i
rARKINU 77.5 f _ .��' PA 1�1 B
TLTTAL. 52M 990 I .._�• k� J LI'1`L:RECA.)LFCOURSE
RESERVEMURLIC
„J +✓� r,% (Ax I , Cv�r Pr1F1�I'.G$
tI w, ! -a IFC.L. -
',w.�}rr+..aew+�'a.nr'n..,� �r•-w-w..ro,a.�r-ser-nT � .�.. 1� � I r
.+��+*..�@rl4sh•�w•�+e.AN�•�!t-y+�w..r� .f+ ... .--u_._.�- �� -.-u1 -, - � '
5VI NU 4
SOURCE: Meriweather Companies - June 2014
FIGURE 2.0-3
r#eridian Updated Master Plan for Specific Plan Area
�aT+,1dfi!li1�
066-001-14
3.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section includes separate subsections for each environmental topic addressed in the 2002 MND.
Each topical section first presents a summary of the information and conclusions of the analysis in the
2002 MND and the 2006 Addendum to this MND. Updated information reflecting any changes in the
circumstances under which the Modified Project will occur is presented for each topic, followed by
analysis of the environmental impacts of fully developing the uses as proposed by the Modified Project
and as compared to the 2002 MND Project and 2006 Addendum Project. The following environmental
topics addressed in the previous environmental review documents are addressed in this Addendum:
• Land Use and Planning
• Population and Housing
• Geology and Soils
• Water
• Air Quality
• Transportation/Circulation
• Biological Resources
• Energy and Mineral Resources
• Hazards
• Noise
• Public Services
• Utilities and Service Systems
• Aesthetics
• Cultural Resources
• Recreation
This Addendum provides updated analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Modified
Project for each of these topics and compares those impacts to those set forth in the 2002 MND Project
and 2006 Addendum Project. In March 2010, the CEQA Guidelines were amended to require lead
agencies to assess the significance of impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the environment. In
response to this new requirement, a section assessing potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions impacts is
provided in this Addendum.
The adopted 2002 MND identified the environmental effects of the 2002 MND Project that would be
less than significant, avoided, or substantially reduced to less than significant levels by the
implementation of the adopted mitigation measures.
The 2006 Addendum evaluated the environmental effects of the development analyzed in the
addendum as compared to the development analyzed in the 2002 MND and determined the revisions as
proposed would not result in any new or substantially more severe significant impacts than identified in
the 2002 MND.
3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Thresholds
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over
the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
The 2002 MND Project Site was primarily undeveloped at the time the 2002 MND was prepared and
contained only a few scattered structures. Given the condition of the site and the surrounding uses, it
was concluded that the 2002 MND Project would not disrupt or divide an existing community or impact
existing low-income housing. It was determined that the development of the 2002 MND Project would
comply with the City's General Plan land use designation. The 2002 MND concluded that there would be
less than significant impacts related to physically dividing an established community.
The City's 2002 General Plan designated the flat portion of the 2002 MND Project Site as Golf Course
(G), and Tourist Commercial (TC) and the portion of the Santa Rosa Mountains on the western portion of
the site as Open Space (OS) with a Hillside Overlay. The area designated Golf Course was located on the
northern, northeastern and eastern portions of the site, while the Tourist Commercial area was situated
in the interior of the site. A small portion of the site was also designated as Tourist Commercial along
Jefferson Street, just north of where the All American Canal enters the site from the east. Timeshare
units were permitted in the Tourist Commercial land use category with the approval of a Conditional Use
Permit. The zoning on the site was consistent with the General Plan land use designations and all
development was to be in accordance with all applicable zoning standards. As the proposed uses
included in the 2002 MND Project were consistent with the 2002 General Plan land use designations and
all applicable zoning requirements, no significant land use impacts were identified in the 2002 MND.
The 2002 MND concluded that there would be less than significant impacts related to consistency with
general plan and zoning designations and consistency with applicable plans and policies adopted by
agencies with jurisdiction over the 2002 MND Project. The 2002 MND determined that there would be
no impacts related to consistency with applicable environmental plans. No mitigation measures were
identified in the 2002 MND related to land use and planning.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
The 2006 Addendum identified surrounding uses including The Citrus residential and golf course
community north of Avenue 52, the Hideaway Golf Club community to the east of Jefferson Street that
had developed since the adoption of the 2002 MND, and the PGA West golf resort community to the
south of Avenue 54. The Specific Plan permitted golf course and resort uses that were compatible with
these existing surrounding golf and residential communities. The golf courses were planned along the
site boundaries to provide a buffer between the planned residential, resort hotels and retail uses and
surrounding uses. No significant impacts associated with land use compatibility were identified.
The 2006 Addendum determined uses permitted by the Specific Plan were consistent with the General
Plan land use designations. The planned golf courses, clubhouse, hotels, and ancillary retail commercial
uses permitted by the Specific Plan were allowed by the Golf Course and Tourist Commercial land use
designations. The timeshare units allowed by the Specific Plan are permitted in the Tourist Commercial
land use category with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe significant land use impacts were
identified for the Specific Plan. Land use impacts were identified as less than significant, consistent with
the 2002 MND.
Existing Conditions
The City consists of residential, resort, and commercial development surrounded by hillside and
mountain open space areas. Most of the land within the City has been developed with a few
undeveloped infill lots located throughout the urbanized area.
The City's 2035 General Plan land use designations for the Modified Project Site are Tourist Commercial,
Recreational Open Space, and Natural Open Space. The Modified Project Site is zoned Tourist
Commercial (CT), Golf Course (GC), and Open Space (OS).
The Tourist Commercial designation specifically allows tourism -related land uses, including resort hotels,
hotels and motels, and resort commercial development, such as conference centers, restaurants, resort -
supporting retail and services. The Recreational Open Space designation applies to parks, recreation
facilities, including driving ranges, club houses and athletic facilities, as well as public and private golf
courses. The Natural Open Space designation is applied to areas of natural open space, whether owned
by private parties or public entities. Little development is permitted in this designation with the
exception of trail or trailhead development.
Zoning surrounding the Modified Project Site includes Low Density Residential (RL) to the north, east,
southeast, and west, Open Space (OS) to the southwest and west, and Medium High Density Residential
(RMH) and Medium Density Residential (RM) to the southeast.
Analysis of the Proposed Project
The Modified Project Site is located next to existing golf courses and residential communities. The Citrus
golf course and residential community is located north of Avenue 52, the Hideaway Golf Club and
residential community is located east of Jefferson Street and the PGA West golf resort and residential
community is located to the south of Avenue 54 adjacent to the Modified Project Site.
The Modified Project Site's Recreational Open Space land use designation is consistent with the
surrounding Recreational Open Space land uses at the Hideaway golf club and residential community,
the Citrus golf course and residential community, and PGA West golf resort and residential community.
The Tourist Commercial land use designation is intended for tourism -related land uses, such as the
proposed resort hotels and resort commercial development, including a conference center, restaurant,
and resort -supporting retail and services. The Tourist Commercial land use designation is
complementary with surrounding Open Space Recreation and Low Density land use designations at the
Hideaway, the Citrus, and PGA West. PGA West, located to the south of the Modified Project Site, also
includes Tourist Commercial uses. The site is currently developed with the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf
Course and the Ahmanson House (acting as the existing temporary Clubhouse), and the Modified Project
would be compatible with these uses as well as the surrounding uses. The Modified Project Site would
not physically divide an existing community. Like the 2002 MND Project and 2006 Addendum Project,
the Modified Project would infill vacant land surrounded by developed land, thereby providing a more
cohesive and connected community.
As stated in the Specific Plan, a Specific Plan amendment is required if it has been determined that the
proposed change is not in conformance with the intent of the current Specific Plan approval. If the City
deems that amendments to the Specific Plan are required, they must be adopted in accordance with the
procedures set forth in Chapter 9.240 of the City's Zoning Code.5
The type and intensity of uses that would be permitted by the Proposed Agreements are in substantial
conformance with the adopted Specific Plan as shown in Table 3.1-1, Statistical Comparison of
Approved Specific Plan and Modified Project. Table 3.1-1 includes land use, number of units, keys, and
commercial square footage. As shown in Table 3.1-1, the development intensities of the Modified
Project result in 310 fewer units, 405 fewer keys, and 125,000 fewer commercial square feet when
compared to what is permitted by the Specific Plan. The Modified Project is consistent and in
accordance with the Specific Plan, which was adopted in 2006, and does not require a Specific Plan
amendment.
Table 3.1-1
Statistical Comparison of Approved Specific Plan and Modified Project
Land Use
Golf
Boutique Hotel
Resort Hotel
Mixed -Use Village
Resort Residential
Park Site
Ahmanson House
Services/Conference
Center***
Total
Approved Specific Plan*
Maximum Commercial
Units Units Square Feet
- - 20,000
225 260 -
405 520 -
160,000
450 500 -
Updated
Maximum
Units
Master Plan**
Commercial
Units Square Feet
25
25
20,000
175
175
-
260
320
-
230
270
40,000
160
160
-
80
80
10,000
- 5,000
1,160
1,360
190,000
850 955 65,000
Source: Meriwether Companies, Statistical Comparison of Approved SilverRock Resort Specific Plan & Meriwether Companies' Plan (July
2014).
Note:
This table represents a comparison cf SilverRock Specific Plan No. 2006-080 approved July 18, 2006 to Meriwether Companies' 7.09.14 plan
and project description.
* The Approved Specific Plan represents the SilverRock Specific Plan No. 2006-080 approved July 18, 2006.
** The Updated Master Plan represents the plan for the Modified Project.
*** The Shared Services Conference Center would be approximately 71,000 square feet shared back -of -house and meeting, conference, and
eventspace.
5 City of La Quinta, SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (2006).
The Modified Project would not conflict with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan (CVMSHCP), which was approved in 2007, after preparation of the 2006 Addendum. As identified in
Biological Resource Mitigation Measure 2, a fence would be constructed to reduce potential adverse
impacts to bighorn sheep by precluding access to the site. With the implementation of Biological
Resource Mitigation Measure 2, the Modified Project would not adversely affect any sensitive natural
community identified in the General Plan, the CVMSHCP policies and regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The CVMSHCP is a joint
regional planning effort of the USFWS, California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), US Forest Service (USFS), National Park Service (NPS), as well as Riverside County
and most local jurisdictions within the Coachella Valley, including the City of La Quinta. The City of La
Quinta participates in the CVMSHCP mitigation fee for new development to offset potential biological
impacts as discussed further in Section 3.7, Biological Resources, and the Modified Project will pay the
CVMSHCP fee.
Land use and planning impacts associated with the Modified Project would be similar to those identified
in the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum and would be less than significant. No new information, changed
circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Modified Project.
3.2 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Thresholds
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
The 2002 MND determined that the 2002 MND Project would introduce land uses consistent with the
General Plan Land Use designations for the 2002 MND Project Site. Because the proposed uses were
found to be consistent with the land use designations, growth attributable to the 2002 MND Project was
accounted for in the City's 2002 General Plan. No portion of the 2002 MND Project Site was designated
for residential use. The timeshare units included in the 2002 MND Project would not be developed as
permanent, primary residences. These timeshare units would not attract permanent residents to the
site; instead the timeshare units would attract visitors. The public infrastructure needed to serve the
proposed uses was available, and no infrastructure extensions were determined to be required that
could induce additional growth beyond that already accounted for in the City's General Plan. No existing
residences were located on the 2002 MND Project Site and therefore, it was determined that the2002
MND Project would not displace existing housing or existing residents. No impacts related to population
or housing were identified.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
The 2006 Addendum concluded that the Specific Plan would only permit land uses that were consistent
with the General Plan land use designations for the 2006 Addendum Project Site, and that the growth
proposed by the 2006 Project had already been accounted for in the City's General Plan. The 2006
Addendum identified that no portion of the Specific Plan Area would be designated for permanent,
primary residential use under the Specific Plan and the timeshare or hotel/condominium units that
would be allowed by the Specific Plan would not be used as permanent and primary residences based
on market information, historical use patterns for such units, and based on City requirements. As a
result, it was determined the Specific Plan would not induce population growth, consistent with the
finding in the 2002 MND, and no new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts
would occur with the implementation of the 2006 Addendum Project.
Existing Conditions
The US Census reported the population of the City was 37,467 in 2010. The California Department of
Finance (DOF) annually updates the latest US Census population numbers. The City's population as of
January 1, 2014 is estimated by the DOF to be 39,032 residents. The Modified Project Site does not
contain any residential units.
Analysis of Modified Project
The Modified Project would allow land uses that are consistent with General Plan land use designations
for the Modified Project Site and as permitted by the adopted Specific Plan. The Specific Plan allows for
timeshare, hotel, resort caritas, and privately owned residential units. It is anticipated these units would
be occupied on a seasonal basis, as is typical for privately owned units in resort communities in the
Coachella Valley. Rental of the privately owned units would be encouraged and managed through the
hotel reservation system. Based on these characteristics, the Modified Project would not induce
substantial growth in the area. As shown in Table 3.1-1, the development intensities of the Modified
Project result in 310 fewer units, 405 fewer keys, and 125,000 fewer commercial square feet when
compared to what is permitted by the Specific Plan. The Modified Project's reduction in intensity of land
uses would generate fewer visitors to the Specific Plan Area as compared to the 2002 MND Project and
2006 Addendum Project. It should be noted that the Specific Plan was accounted for in the growth
projections in the 2035 General Plan6 and as such, no new expansion of existing utility or infrastructure
improvements would be needed.
The land use impacts of the Modified Project would be consistent with the impacts identified in the
2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant. No new
information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of
the Modified Project.
3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Thresholds
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of
the project, and potentially result in an onsite or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
6 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Economic Development (2013), p. II-168.
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
A City-wide geotechnical analysis was conducted for the 2002 General Plan. No Alquist-Priolo Zones
were identified in the City, and no active or potential active faulting was identified within the City's
jurisdiction.
The 2002 MND identified that the 2002 MND Project Site was subject to ground shaking during a seismic
event similar to any area in the southern California region. The Maximum Probable Earthquake (MPE)
for the City of La Quinta was identified as a 7.2 earthquake while the Maximum Credible Earthquake
(MCE) was identified 8.0 earthquake when measured on the Richter Scale. The 2002 MND found that
there could be potentially significant impacts due to seismic grounding shaking, but that compliance
with the recommendations of design level geotechnical studies and applicable building codes would
mitigate this potential impact to less than significant. This potential impact required the implementation
of mitigation measures 1 and 2 to ensure that the identified potential impact was reduced to less than
significant.
Given the probability of ground shaking, it was determined that there was also a potential for
liquefaction and associated dynamic settlement, as the soils on the 2002 MND Project Site were found
to have the potential for hydroconsolidation with the addition of water. Furthermore, the 2002 MND
identified that the levees of the All American Canal, which bisects the 2002 MND Project Site, have the
potential for liquefaction and lateral spreading hazard impacts.
A geotechnical investigation was conducted for the 2002 MND Project Site, and groundwater was
expected to be deeper than 60 feet as soil borings to depths of 50 feet did not encounter any trace of
groundwater.7 The absence of shallow groundwater indicates that the potential for liquefaction and
seismically induced settlement on the 2002 MND Project Site was low. The 2002 MND concluded there
would be less than significant impacts related to seismic ground failure (including liquefaction) upon
incorporation of the identified mitigation measures 1 and 2.
The 2002 MND identified that loose soils observed on the site could have the potential for settlement if
subjected to structural loads if left in their natural condition. These loose surficial soils were assessed to
be subject to wind erosion and transport. The 2002 MND concluded that the 2002 MND Project would
have no impacts related to erosion or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, and fill.
7 Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Corporation, Limited Geotechnical Investigation (November
1999).
The 2002 MND concluded there would be less than significant impacts related to seismic ground failure
(including liquefaction), landslides, mudflow, subsidence of land, or due to expansive soils or other soil
conditions with incorporation of mitigation measures 1 and 2.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. Prior to the design and construction of any structural improvements, a comprehensive design level
geotechnical evaluation shall be prepared that includes subsurface exploration and laboratory
testing. Recommendations for grading/earthwork, surface and subsurface drainage, foundations,
pavement structural sections, and other pertinent geotechnical design considerations shall be
formulated and implemented based on the findings of this evaluation.
2. All buildings planned as a result of the proposed Project shall be constructed in conformance with
the Uniform Building Code (UBC), as adopted by the City of La Quinta.
Summary of Findings in the 2006 Addendum
The 2006 Addendum found that potential impacts related to geology and soils would be the same as
those identified in the 2002 MND and would be less than significant. No substantial changes were
identified.
Given the probability of ground shaking, a potential for liquefaction and associated dynamic settlement
was identified, as the soils in the Specific Plan Area have the potential for hydroconsolidation with the
addition of water. The absence of shallow groundwater identified at the time of the 2002 MND
indicated that the potential for liquefaction and seismically induced settlement in the Specific Plan Area
is low.
At the time the 2006 Addendum was being prepared, the SilverRock Soil Stabilization Project was being
implemented to avoid the loss of loose soils in the Specific Plan Area. The SilverRock Soil Stabilization
Project included stabilizing approximately 245 acres of undeveloped land within the Specific Plan Area
with vegetation. The stabilization project involved minor grading, clearing and grubbing, planting of
barley seed and supplying temporary irrigation in order to grow the seed for approximately 3 weeks.
Once the barley was established the irrigation was removed and the barley would stabilize the soil
together for 2 to 3 years. This was done as a dust mitigation measure until the site is completely
developed.
As previously mentioned in the 2002 MND, the 2006 Addendum concluded that ground subsidence due
to the lowering of the existing groundwater table was considered unlikely as no similar subsidence has
occurred anywhere near the City. Impacts associated with the Specific Plan were the same as those
identified in the 2002 MND and were less than significant.
The 2006 Addendum also concluded that the presence of expansive soils in the City is common and
mitigation measure 1 and 2 would reduce the potential impact of expansive soils within the Specific Plan
Area to less than significant. The 2006 Addendum identified that impacts associated with the Specific
Plan were the same as those identified for the 2002 MND Project and would be less than significant. No
new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation
of the 2006 Addendum Project.
Existing Conditions
A Technical Background Report for the Safety Element of the La Quinta 2035 General Plan was
completed in 2010.8 The report identified earthquake -triggered geologic effects including ground
shaking, surface fault rupture, landslides, liquefaction, subsidence, and seiches. Seismic hazards include
areas susceptible to earthquake -induced slope instability and liquefaction. Geological hazards identified
within the City in the 2035 General Plan EIR included landslides, slope instability, compressible,
collapsible or expansive soils, soil corrosivity, ground subsidence, erosion, and wind-blown sand.
Potential geology and soils hazards identified on the Modified Project Site include liquefaction,
landslides, slope instability, and ground subsidence.
Ground subsidence was identified in 2009 and showed that differential settlement had occurred in a
portion of the Coachella Canal and that CVWD must replace a portion of the existing Coachella Canal
within the Arnold Palmer Golf Course to address the subsidence.
Furthermore, the report found that within the City, land subsidence appears to be caused primarily by
groundwater pumping and possibly caused by tectonic activity. Ground fissures developed near the
intersection of Avenue 48 and Adams Street, located at the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains near the
margin of the Coachella Valley.
No Alquist-Priolo Zones, or evidence of active or potentially active faulting have been identified within
the boundaries of, or near, the Modified Project Site.
8 City of La Quinta, Technical Background Report to the Safety Element of the La Quinta 2035 General Plan Update, Seismic
Hazards, Geologic Hazards, Flooding Hazards (June 2010).
Analysis of Proposed Project
There is no evidence of an Alquist-Priolo Zone, or active or potential active faulting encountered
anywhere within the boundaries of or near the Modified Project Site. Therefore, the potential for
surface rupture as a result of fault plane displacement during the design life of the Modified Project
would be less than significant.
While there are no active or potential faults within the City; however, geological analyses conducted for
the 2035 General Plan indicate that the City could experience moderate to very high ground shaking
from earthquakes along the San Andrea Fault. Strong ground shaking can result in indirect hazards, such
as slope instability, liquefaction, settlement, landslides, and flood inundation.
All new buildings in the City are required to utilize reinforced masonry. Additionally, new construction
must comply with the UBC, and compliance with the UBC would allow structures to resist major
earthquakes without collapsing, even if structural damage occurs.9 Compliance with applicable building
codes (as identified in mitigation measure 2 of the 2002 MND) would minimize structural damage to
buildings and ensure safety in the event of a moderate or major earthquake and reduce this potential
impact to a less than significant level.
The Modified Project is not located in areas with high or moderate liquefaction susceptibility. Impacts
would be similar to the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and less than significant.
Areas at risk due to seismically induced slope instability occur within the southern and western portions
of the Planning Area near the base of steep slopes associated with the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto
Mountains. Lands downslope of mountain slopes and hillsides may be susceptible to risks associated
with landslide and rockfall. The Modified Project is not located in areas with very high, high, or
moderate earthquake -induced slope instability. The western edge of the Modified Project Site is located
adjacent to the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains, where soil slumps and rock falls occur. This area of
the Modified Project Site contains the existing Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course and is not designated
for development. Therefore, the potential impact to structures from earthquake induced slope
instability would be less than significant.
Unconsolidated soils occur in many areas of the City and are particularly subject to erosion, including
wind erosion. Erosion can result in loss of topsoil and diminish soil productivity. A majority of the City is
located within an active wind erosion zone. Mitigation measures 1 through 3 in Section 3.5 Air Quality
soil watering at construction sites, a PM10 Management Plan for construction operations, and
9 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
implementation of air quality control measures identified in the Coachella Valley PM State
Implementation Plan. Due to the implementation of the previously mentioned SilverRock Soil
Stabilization Project, the Modified Project Site already incorporates vegetation to avoid the loss of loose
soils.
The Modified Project Site is not located on a geologic unit that is considered unstable and ground
subsidence due to the lowering of the existing groundwater table is considered unlikely as the
groundwater table is a minimum of 50 feet below ground surface. Some localized subsidence has
occurred in a portion of the existing Coachella Canal within the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course
because the Coachella Canal is located on both bedrock and alluvial soils, which have different
settlement rates.
The Modified Project would not include the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems. Consequently, no impacts would occur with the implementation of the Modified Project.
The impacts of the Modified Project would be consistent with the impacts identified in the 2002 MND
and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MIND and geology and soils impacts would be less than significant with
the incorporation of mitigation measures 1 and 2 identified in the 2002 MIND. No new information,
changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the Modified
Project.
3.4 WATER
Thresholds
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on or off site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on or off site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm
water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary
or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
A site -specific water quality evaluation was prepared to analyze potential water quality issues associated
with development of the site. As pervious soils would be developed, it was determined that there would
have been a slight change in the absorption of runoff on the site, an increase in the amount of storm
runoff and changes to existing drainage pattern on the site. Through site -specific mitigation measures 3,
4, 7, and 8, the increase in the amount of water runoff from the site was determined to be less than
significant.
As no surface water bodies existed within the 2002 MND Project Site, no impacts to surface water
bodies were identified. Since the golf courses proposed in the 2002 MND Project would introduce small
man-made water ponds and lakes the potential for landscaping products to impact surface water quality
was identified. Mitigation measures 5, 6, 7, and 8 were incorporated into the 2002 MND to reduce this
potential impact to less than significant.
Domestic and irrigation water is provided throughout La Quinta and the eastern Coachella Valley by the
Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The main source of potable water provided to the City is from
an underground aquifer, known as the Whitewater River Subbasin, beneath the valley floor. Irrigation
water is supplied from this same aquifer and from the Colorado River via the Coachella Canal, and is
consumed generally in the area from Indio and La Quinta south to the Salton Sea.
According to the CVWD, there was ample water supply to serve the 2002 MND Project without
substantially or adversely changing the quantity, quality, or flow of groundwater resources.10 It was also
recommended that when possible, non -potable water from the All American Canal be utilized for
construction purposes to suppress dust generated by earthmoving activities, the operation of vehicles
on dirt surfaces, and exposed dirt surfaces as indicated in mitigation measure 2.
Water for irrigation of the golf course and landscaping, which constitutes the majority of the water
demand of the 2002 MND Project, was to be obtained from the All American Canal. In a continued effort
to reduce the total amount of water used, specific water conservation measures for both landscaping
and irrigation, and plumbing controls were recommended as conditions on the connection of the 2002
MND Project to CVWD facilities. In addition to these CVWD conditions, mitigation measures 1, 4, 7, and
8 were recommended to mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level.
The 2002 MND concluded that there could be potentially significant impacts regarding potential for
discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen, or turbidity). These potential impacts were reduced to less than significant levels with
mitigation measures 3, 7, and 8.
The City requires that all new developments construct on -site retention basins with a 100-year storm
capacity. As documented in the 2002 General Plan EIR, the 2002 MND Project Site was not located
within a 100-year floodplain, nor was it within a 500-year floodplain. As the site was primarily vacant
and undeveloped, the 2002 MND identified the 2002 MND Project would result in an increase in
impervious surfaces, but with the introduction of two golf courses, there was ample opportunity to
design the site so that it could have effectively managed anticipated storm events. The 2002 MND
Project was identified to result in less than significant impacts on hydrology and water with mitigation.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. At such time that non -potable water sources become available to the Project Site, the Project shall
be connected to this resource and utilize the non -potable water for irrigation purposes.
2. During construction activities, water trucks are to acquire water from non -potable water sources,
such as reclaimed water and/or canal water.
3. A hydrology master plan shall be prepared for the Project Specific Plan. Further, a hydrology study
shall be prepared for the hydrology master plan and submitted to the City of La Quinta for approval
10 Jim Zimmerman, Development Service Supervisor, Coachella Valley Water District (March 2002).
prior to the issuance of grading permits. This study shall demonstrate that the Project would
construct storm drainage and hydrologic improvements, such as on -site stormwater retention
basins, that conform to the City's master hydrology and storm drain improvement program as well
as implement regional and local requirements, policies, and programs.
4. Drought tolerant landscaping shall be utilized as a means of reducing water consumption.
5. Prior to the initiation of any construction activity on the Project Site, a Notice of Intent (NO]) to
conduct construction activities under the general NPDES construction permit shall be filed. Under
the conditions of this NPDES permit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and
Monitoring Plan are required. The SWPPP shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) in
compliance with the NPDES program requirements.
6. Any existing groundwater wells located on the site that are no longer in use shall be abandoned in
accordance with federal, State, and local laws and regulations prior to the issuance of building
permits.
7. Prior to operation of the golf course, the golf course operator shall prepare a Golf Course
Management Plan that includes an irrigation plan, water usage plan, and chemical management
plan in order to reduce, to the extent feasible, golf course irrigation runoff and percolation into the
groundwater basin.
8. Design of new roads, golf courses, man-made ponds, common landscape areas, storm water basins,
and other facilities shall incorporate proper engineering controls to channel storm and irrigation
runoff into detention/retention facilities that are sized to accommodate design year storms and that
incorporate filtration systems or other devices to reduce the potential for herbicides, pesticides,
fertilizers, and other contaminants to percolate to groundwater or surface water runoff.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
Since the Specific Plan would convert the remaining vacant portions of the Specific Plan Area into golf
course and resort uses, no changes to the impacts in the 2002 MND were identified. The 2002 MND
found that the 2006 Addendum Project had potentially significant impacts unless mitigated in regards to
water quality. The 2002 MND found that there could be potentially significant impacts regarding the
potential for discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g.,
temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity). These potential impacts required mitigation measures to
ensure that the potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. The 2002 MND found
that the 2006 Addendum Project would have less than significant impacts in regards to the exposure of
people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding, change in the quantity of groundwater,
either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations and impacts to groundwater quality. The 2006 Addendum identified that the impacts of the
Specific Plan were the same as those identified in the 2002 MND and would be less than significant.
The 2006 Addendum identified that the intensity of uses allowed by the Specific Plan would be greater
than the uses considered in the 2002 MND, would result in a nominal increase in water demand, as
discussed further in Section 3.12, Utilities and Service Systems. Based on the Water Supply Assessment
(WSA) and the Water Supply Verification (WSV), the CVWD Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)
incorporated herein, the Coachella Valley Water Management Plan (CVWMP) and the records for such
CVWD approvals, the City concluded that existing and planned future water supplies will be sufficient to
satisfy the demands of the 2006 Addendum Project in addition to existing and planned future uses.
Impacts of the Specific Plan were the same as those identified in the 2002 MND and were determined to
be less than significant.
The 2006 Addendum identified that there would be a slight change in drainage patterns and absorption,
but that these changes could be on and adjacent to the existing and proposed golf courses within the
Specific Plan Area, no impacts to off -site drainage would result. Additionally, there would be an increase
in the amount of storm runoff from the site. With on -site drainage improvements, the increase in the
amount of runoff from the site would be less than significant. As previously stated, existing and
proposed golf courses within the Specific Plan had sufficient capacity to accommodate drainage without
off -site drainage impacts. Per Mitigation Measure 3 identified in the 2002 MND, preparation of a
hydrology study is required prior to development to demonstrate that planned storm drainage and
hydrologic improvements, such as on -site stormwater retention basins, will conform to the City's master
hydrology and storm drain improvement program, as well as other applicable regional and local
requirements, policies, and programs.
No new or substantially greater hydrology and water quality impacts would occur with the
implementation of the Specific Plan. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe
impacts would occur with the implementation of the 2006 Addendum Project.
Existing Conditions
The Specific Plan Area is developed with the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course, Clubhouse, and has been
mass graded and vegetated to minimize soil erosion. The golf course has sufficient capacity to
accommodate existing on -site drainage quantities. On -site drainage systems have been constructed
since the development of the site in 2002.
A major storm drain exists along the northerly property frontage within Avenue 52 which extends 2,200
feet to the Calle Rondo storm drain from the northwesterly corner of the site to a point just past the
Avenue 52/SilverRock Way entrance and then back onto the resort property in to the second golf course
envelope.
California is currently in a water drought. See Section 3.12, Utilities and Service Systems, for more
information. The Arnold Palmer Golf Course is irrigated using Coachella Canal water.
The Specific Plan Area is not located within a 100-year or 500-year floodplain.11
Analysis of Modified Project
The Modified Project would comply with the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the Colorado River Basin Regional Water Control Board.
The Modified Project Site would use the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and Best
Management Practices (BMP) to reduce impacts from runoff during construction and during the life of
the Modified Project. Consistent with the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND, the
Modified Project would not otherwise substantially degrade water quality.
The Modified Project will design the common area irrigation systems to use canal water, and the plant
palette design will emphasize water -efficient drought -tolerant plants. The Modified Project will comply
with the latest CVWD water requirements and ordinances, as well as City requirements.
Impacts would be the same as those previously identified and analyzed in the 2002 MND and 2006
Addendum to the 2002 MND for conversion of the site into golf courses and resort uses. The 2002 MND
found that there could be potentially significant impacts regarding the potential for discharge into
surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or
turbidity). The development of the golf course and associated ponds, lakes, and drainage features and
implementation of mitigation measure 3 and 7 ensure that water quality impacts are mitigated to levels
that are less than significant.
Additional water sources are considered as a supplement to groundwater in that they are used to
recharge the groundwater aquifer, serve as a source substitution for groundwater, or used for irrigation,
as discussed in Section 3.12. All previous groundwater wells no longer in use were abandoned in
accordance with federal, State, and local regulations.
11 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Environmental Hazards, Flooding and Hydrology, Exhibit IV-6,
FEMA Flood Zones and Flood Control Facilities, (2013).
As previously discussed in the summary of findings in the 2006 Addendum, existing and proposed golf
courses within the Specific Plan Area have the sufficient capacity to accommodate drainage without off -
site drainage impacts.
The storm drain within Avenue 52 conveys water into the envelope of the proposed second golf course
along Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street to allow for percolation into the groundwater aquifer. The
Modified Project Site would incorporate similar amounts of open space as identified in the Specific Plan
to allow for percolation of water runoff into the aquifer.
All developed areas within the City's limits are outside the 100-year flood zone. Therefore, the Modified
Project Site is not located within a 100-year flood zone.
Hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the Modified Project would be similar to those
identified in the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant
with the incorporation of mitigation measures 1 through 5 and 7 and 8 identified in the 2002 MND. No
new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation
of the Modified Project.
3.5 AIR QUALITY
Thresholds
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
For the 2002 MND, construction and operational air quality modeling was completed based on the size
of the 2002 MND Project Site and the types of uses planned for development. Air quality emissions for
the 2002 MND Project were not projected to exceed any air quality emission significance thresholds
with mitigation. All the planned uses for the 2002 MND Project were fairly typical of uses found
throughout the City. Given the size and scale of the 2002 MND Project, which consisted largely of golf
course uses with tourist commercial uses, the 2002 MND Project was not found to have any noticeable
effect on local climate and atmospheric conditions.
None of the uses posed any special concern with regards to harmful or odorous pollutants that could
negatively affect sensitive receptors located outside the 2002 MND Project Site boundaries and impacts
were determined to be less than significant.
None of the uses planned were identified as posing any special concern with regards to harmful or
odorous pollutants that could negatively affect sensitive uses located outside the 2002 MND Project Site
boundaries. The 2002 MND also determined that the 2002 MND Project would have no impacts due to
the alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature causing any change in climate or creating
objectionable odors
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. Construction equipment shall be phased and operated in a manner to ensure the lowest
construction -related pollutant emission levels practical, and shall require the use of water trucks,
temporary irrigation systems and other measures which will limit fugitive dust emissions during site
disturbance and construction.
2. Air quality control measures identified in the Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (SIP)
shall be implemented.
3. A PM10 Management Plan for construction operations shall be submitted prior to the issuance of
grading permits. The plan shall include dust management controls such as:
• Water site and equipment morning and evening
• Spread soil binders on site, unpaved roads, and parking areas
• Re-establish ground cover on construction site through seeding and watering
• Pave construction roads, where appropriate
• Operate street -sweepers on paved roads adjacent to site
The following measures shall be implemented to reduce construction related traffic congestion:
• Configure construction parking to minimize traffic disturbance
• Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes
• Provide flag person to ensure safety at construction sites, as necessary
• Schedule operations affecting roadways for off-peak traffic hours
• Provide rideshare incentives to construction personnel
4. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize solar or low emission water heaters to reduce
natural gas consumption and emissions.
5. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy
consumption and emissions.
6. Shade trees shall be provided in close proximity to Timeshare, hotel and golf facility structures to
reduce building heating/cooling needs.
7. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize energy -efficient and automated controls for air
conditioners to reduce energy consumption and emissions.
8. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize special sunlight -filtering window coatings or
double -paned windows to reduce thermal gain or loss.
9. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize automatic lighting on/off controls and energy -
efficient lighting (including parking areas) to reduce electricity consumption and associated
emissions.
10. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize light-colored roofing materials in residential
construction as opposed to dark roofing materials.
11. Bus stops shall be positioned at locations on and adjacent to the site to be determined in
coordination with the bus transit service provider that will serve the Project area. Bus stops should
be generally located 1/4-mile walking distance from Timeshare units.
12. The golf course shall design on -site circulation plans for clubhouse parking to reduce vehicle
queuing.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
The 2006 Addendum determined that the Specific Plan would permit a greater intensity of tourist
commercial uses than were analyzed in the 2002 MND; however, with the exception of volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions during painting of the proposed structures, construction and operation
would generate pollutant levels below the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
thresholds of significance.
When the 2006 Addendum was prepared, a portion of the Specific Plan Area had already been
developed with the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course. To minimize dust emissions from the
undeveloped portions of the site, the City stabilized approximately 245 acres of undeveloped land within
the Specific Plan Area by planting barley, which stabilized the soil together for 2 to 3 years.
Air pollutant emissions associated with uses and activities that would be permitted by the SilverRock
Resort Specific Plan were estimated using the URBEMIS2002 air quality model. Model inputs were based
on the size of the Specific Plan Area and the amount and types of uses that would be permitted. While
the Specific Plan permitted a greater intensity of tourist commercial uses than analyzed in the 2002
MND, model results indicated that the 2006 Addendum Project construction and operation would
generate pollutant levels below SCAQMD thresholds, with the exception of VOC emissions during
painting of the proposed structures. However, the URBEMIS2002 model estimates emissions based on
the assumption that painting of all proposed structures would occur concurrently.
As construction, including painting of individual structures, would be phased with construction and,
therefore, would occur over time, the model overestimated the daily VOC emissions associated with
such activities. This impact, therefore, was considered less than significant. While the greater intensity
of hotel and retail uses permitted by the Specific Plan resulted in a greater number of daily vehicle trips
than was analyzed in the 2002 MND, the resort character of the SilverRock Resort in its entirety would
result in a high rate of internal trip capture, as resort guests would stay for extended periods and use
the golf course, retail, restaurant, and other resort amenities. As a result, the resort nature of the uses
allowed by the Specific Plan would result in patrons staying on the site for extended periods of time.
These extended stays within the Specific Plan area would reduce the number of new daily trips being
generated. This reduction in daily vehicle trip generation was reflected in the 2006 Addendum Project
air pollutant emissions estimates. The Specific Plan incorporated mitigation measures identified in the
2002 MND in order to reduce air quality impacts to the fullest extent feasible. With implementation of
mitigation measure 1 through 12 of the 2002 MND and mitigation measure 13, which would reduce VOC
emissions from architectural coatings, impacts would be reduced to less than significant.
The Specific Plan did not allow any land uses that would pose any special concern with regards to
harmful or odorous pollutants that could negatively affect sensitive receptors surrounding the 2006
Addendum Project Site.
Air quality impacts associated with the Specific Plan would be similar to those identified in the 2002
MND and would be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures 1 through 12
identified in the 2002 MND and mitigation measure 13, which would reduce VOC emissions from
architectural coatings. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would
occur with the implementation of the Specific Plan.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2006 Addendum
13. To reduce VOC emissions associated with architectural coatings, water -based or low-VOC coatings
shall be used and applied with spray equipment with high transfer efficiency and/or the need for
paints and solvents should be reduced by using pre -coated building materials or naturally colored
building materials.
Existing Conditions
The Modified Project Site is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin within the SCAQMD jurisdiction. The
City of La Quinta is subject to high intensity wind events year round. During fall and winter months, high-
pressure systems from the north can conflict with low-pressure systems from the south, and create a
condition known as the Santa Ana winds, which can blow for multiple days at high speeds. These strong
winds sweep up, suspend and transport large quantities of sand and dust, reducing visibility, damaging
property and constituting a significant health threat.
The Federal and State Clean Air Act standards are the thresholds by which regional ambient air quality is
measured. In the Coachella Valley air quality has exceeded state and federal standards for ozone and
particulate matter. In order to monitor regional pollutants of concern, the SCAQMD operates and
maintains two regional air quality monitoring stations in Source Receptor Area 30 (SRA 30), including
one at a Palm Springs Fire Station, and one in the City of Indio off of Jackson Street. These monitoring
stations report daily air pollutant concentrations and meteorological conditions. The Salton Sea Air Basin
is currently designated as being in nonattainment for the federal ozone, PM10, and PM2.5,
nonattainment for the State PM10 and unclassified for State PM2.5 standards. Areas where air pollution
levels persistently exceed the state or national ambient air quality standards may be designated
"nonattainment."
Analysis of Modified Project
The 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) was prepared to accommodate growth, reduce the high
levels of pollutants within the areas under the jurisdiction of SCAQMD, return clean air to the region,
and minimize the impact on the economy. Projects that are determined to be consistent with the AQMP
would not interfere with attainment of the goals of the plan because this growth is included in the
projections utilized in the formulation of the AQMP. Therefore, projects, uses, and activities that are
consistent with the growth projections used in the development of the AQMP would not jeopardize
attainment of the air quality goals identified in the AQMP, even if they exceed the SCAQMD
recommended daily emissions thresholds.
The Modified Project has been accounted for in the City's 2035 General Plan growth projections which
was determined to be consistent with the 2012 AQMP growth projections.12
The construction emissions for the Modified Project were calculated using construction emission factors
contained in the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) model. The emission calculations
assumed the use of standard construction practices, such as compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403
(Fugitive Dust), to minimize the generation of fugitive dust, SCAQMD Rule 403.1 (Supplemental Fugitive
Dust Control Requirements For Coachella Valley Sources), and Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings).
Compliance with Rule 403, Rule 403.1, and Rule 1113 is mandatory for all construction projects.
Specifically, Rule 403 and 403.1 require watering of exposed surfaces and unpaved roads three times
daily, which is estimated to reduce fugitive dust emissions of particulates less than 10 microns in
diameter (PM10) and particulates less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) by 61 percent, requires a
fugitive dust control plan for construction projects, and requires reductions in the VOC content of
coatings. Tier 3 engines for off -road vehicles during construction activities, as required by the California
Air Resources Board, was reflected in the CaIEEMod emissions calculations below.
Construction
The estimated maximum daily emissions during Modified Project construction include the incorporation
of SCAQMD Rules 403, 403.1, and 1113 and are presented in Table 3.5-1, Highest Daily Construction
Pollutant Emissions. These estimates are based on the expected location, size, and development of the
proposed Modified Project uses. The analysis assumes that all of the construction equipment and
activities would occur continuously over the day and that activities would overlap. In reality, this would
not occur, as most equipment operates only a fraction of each workday and many of the activities would
12 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Economic Development (2013), II-168
not overlap on a daily basis. The Modified Project assumed up to 5 acres were disturbed each day when
compared to 10 acres disturbed each day as analyzed by the 2006 Addendum Project. As shown in Table
3.5-1, construction activities associated with the development of the Modified Project would not result
in an exceedance of VOC, nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxide (SOx), PM10, and
PM2.5 concentration thresholds. Impacts with regard to these air pollutants would be less than
significant, even when assuming overlapping construction activities. Potential construction emission
impacts on sensitive receptors are analyzed below.
Table 3.5-1
Highest Daily Construction Pollutant Emissions
Pollutant (pounds/day)
Source VOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5
Maximum
Emission 72.4 56.2 103.9 0.2 7.7 4.7
SCAQMD 75 100 550 150 150 55
threshold
Threshold No No No No No No
Exceeded?
Source: Refer to Modeling in Appendix A, A and GHG Emissions Calculations.
Abbreviations: CO = carbon monoxide; NOx = nitrogen oxide; PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns, PM2.5 = particulate matter
less than 2.5 microns; VOC = volatile organic compounds, SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District, SOx = sulfur oxide.
Operation
The estimated operational emissions are based on development of all the proposed resort uses are
presented in Table 3.5-2, Operational Emissions. As shown in Table 3.5-2, the Modified Project's
operational emissions would not exceed regional daily VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5
concentration thresholds. Therefore, daily operational emissions generated by the Modified Project will
be less than significant.
Table 3.5-2
Operational Emissions
Pollutant (pounds/day)
Source VOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Emission 65.6 60.2 318.9 0.4 26.1 8.8
SCAQMD threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold exceeded? No No No No No No
Source: Refer to Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Modeling data sheets in Appendix A, AQ and GHG Emissions Calculations.
As shown in Table 3.5-2, operational emissions for the Modified Project do not exceed the SCAQMD
thresholds of significance. According to SCAQMD, if an individual project results in air emissions of
criteria pollutants that are below the SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds for project -specific
impacts, then the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of these criteria
pollutants. By applying SCAQMD's cumulative air quality impact methodology, implementation of the
Modified Project would not exceed the thresholds for these criteria air pollutants and no significant
cumulative impacts would occur. Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of criteria air pollutants. Accordingly, cumulative impacts would be potentially
significant. Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in a cumulative considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the Modified Project region is non -attainment.
Air quality impacts of the Modified Project would be consistent with the impacts identified in the 2002
MND Project and 2006 Addendum Project with implementation of mitigation measures 1 through 13
and will be less than significant. No new or substantially greater impacts would occur with the
implementation of the Modified Project.
Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are defined as schools, residential homes, hospitals, resident care facilities, daycare
centers, or other facilities that may house individuals with health conditions that would be adversely
impacted by changes in air quality. The Modified Project Site is located on a site that is currently
developed with the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course and Ahmanson House, with the nearest sensitive
receptors being the surrounding residential and golf communities to the north, east, and south. The
nearest sensitive receptors are located in PGA West and the Hideaway residential and golf communities,
approximately 125 feet and 150 feet, respectively to the south and east of the boundaries of the
Modified Project Site.
Localized Significance Threshold
The localized significance thresholds (LSTs) used in this analysis address whether there are potential
impacts to residents and neighborhoods located around and near the Modified Project Site. The
allowable mass -rate emissions were determined using the specified thresholds for a 5-acre site at a
distance of 50 meters (150 feet) from the nearest sensitive receptor as determined by SCAQMD. The
construction and operation analysis for LSTs for the Modified Project are shown in Table 3.5-3, LST
Emissions. As shown in Table 3.5-3, the on -site emissions estimated incorporate the required
regulations for compliance with Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), Rule 403.1, and Tier 3 engines for off -road
construction equipment. The construction of the Modified Project would not generate on -site emissions
in excess of the site -specific LSTs for NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5.
Table 3.5-3
LST Emissions
On -Site Emissions (pounds/day)
Source
NOx
CO
PM10
PM2.5
Construction
Maximum emissions
56.2
103.9
7.7 4.7
LST threshold
340
3,237
44 11
Threshold Exceeded?
No
No
No
No
Operational
Area/energy emissions
8.3
45.8
1.74
1.73
LST threshold
340
3,237
11
3
Threshold Exceeded?
No
No
No
No
Source: Modeling results are located in Appendix A, AQ and GHG Emissions calculations.
Abbreviations: CO = carbon monoxide; NOx =
nitrogen oxide; PM10 = particulate matter less than 10
microns; PM2.5 = particulate matter less
than 2.5 microns;
As indicated in Table 3.5-3, the construction of the Modified Project would result in emissions below the
localized significance thresholds. As such, the Modified Project would result in a less than significant
impact on sensitive receptors located north, east, and south of the Specific Plan Area.
According to the SCAQMD, while almost any source may emit objectionable odors, some land uses will
be more likely to produce odors because of their operation. Land uses that are more likely to produce
odors include agriculture, chemical plants, composting operations, dairies, fiberglass molding, landfills,
refineries, rendering plants, rail yards, and wastewater treatment plants. The Modified Project does not
contain any active manufacturing activities and would convert current agricultural land to residential
land uses. Therefore, objectionable odors would not be emitted by the Modified Project. Any
unforeseen odors generated by the Modified Project would be controlled in accordance with SCAQMD
Rule 402 (Nuisance).
The impact of the Modified Project would be consistent with the air quality impacts identified in the
2002 MND Project and the 2006 Addendum Project and with the incorporation of mitigation measures 1
through 13 identified in the 2002 MND would be less than significant. No new information, changed
circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the Modified Project.
3.6 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
Thresholds
a) Exceed the capacity of the existing circulation system, based on an applicable measure of
effectiveness (as designated in a general plan policy, ordinance, etc.), taking into account all
relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets,
highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program including, but not limited to level of
service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
The 2002 MND Project as evaluated in the 2002 MND included golf course and resort uses consistent
with the General Plan Land Use Designations for the site. Based on trip generation rates for the planned
uses, the traffic analysis prepared for the 2002 MND estimated that a total of 6,383 daily trips would be
generated by the golf courses and projected resort development. As concluded in the traffic analysis, all
of the study roadway intersections would operate at LOS D or better during peak hours. Implementation
of mitigation measure 1 would ensure that no significant impacts would occur at the 2002 MND Project
entrance and Avenue 52, the 2002 MND Project entrance and Jefferson Street, and Jefferson Street and
Avenue 54 if signals are warranted at these intersections.
The 2002 MND determined that the 2002 MND Project would have less than significant impacts related
to hazards and safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment), inadequate emergency access to nearby uses, insufficient
parking capacity on site or off site, and hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists. The 2002 MND
also concluded the 2002 MND Project would have no impacts in regards to conflicts with adopted
policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) and rail, waterborne, or
air traffic impacts.
The 2002 MND identified that the 2002 MND Project would not impact air traffic as it is not located in an
area that is adjacent to an airport. The nearest airport was approximately 7 miles away from the 2002
MND Project Site.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. A traffic signal shall be installed at the Project entrance and Avenue 52, the Project entrance and
Jefferson Street and at the intersection of Avenue 54 and Jefferson Street when and if they are
warranted. The developer of the site shall be responsible for payment of a fair share of the cost of
installing these signals.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
The Specific Plan allowed the continued development of the 2006 Addendum Project Site with golf
course and resort uses consistent with the General Plan and the 2006 Addendum Project as analyzed in
the 2002 MND. Since the adoption of the 2002 MND, only one traffic signal was warranted to be
installed at the 2006 Addendum Project entrance and Jefferson Street. An updated traffic evaluation
was completed to determine if the type and amount of uses that would be permitted by the Specific
Plan would result in potentially new or more severe significant traffic impacts than those identified in
the 2002 MND. While the intensity of resort and retail uses and the amount of traffic generated by
these uses would be greater than the amount assessed in the 2002 MND, no new or more severe
significant traffic impacts were identified because the surrounding roadway network had the capacity to
accommodate the traffic and impacts had been previously analyzed during the 2002 General Plan
update process. The 2006 Addendum concluded that there was no substantial change in the level of
impacts from the 2006 Addendum Project that was subject to the 2002 MND and the Specific Plan. No
new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation
of the Specific Plan.
The 2002 General Plan identified that the minimum level of service required for intersections along
roadways contained in the Riverside County Congestion Management Program (CMP) is level of service
(LOS) E. Highway 111 is a CMP roadway.
The City's General Plan established LOS D as the City's minimum level of service for intersections.
The 2006 Addendum concluded that the Specific Plan would allow the continued development of the
2006 Addendum Project Site with golf course and resort uses consistent with the General Plan and the
2006 Addendum Project as analyzed in the 2002 MND. While the type of uses allowed by the proposed
Specific Plan would be consistent with the General Plan and the traffic analysis prepared for General
Plan EIR, the permitted intensity of these uses would be greater than previously assumed in the 2002
MND. Based upon applicable trip generation rates, the full build out of the uses that would be permitted
by the Specific Plan could generate up to approximately 20,020 trips per day with 1,420 AM peak hour
trips and 1,830 PM peak hour trips, if internal trips are not accounted for. This worst case estimate is not
realistic and overstates actual trip generation because it double counts some trips as many of the resort
hotel, golf and retail village trips would be between these different uses and would stay within the
Specific Plan Area for this reason. A comparison of this worst -case project trip generation estimate and
the generation rates established by the General Plan traffic model indicates that the 2002 General Plan
EIR traffic model assumed the generation of approximately 11,181 more trips (31,202 trips - 20,021 trips
= 11,181 more trips) than the Specific Plan. Therefore, the 2006 Addendum identified that 2002 General
Plan Circulation Element roadway network was able to accommodate traffic generated by the Specific
Plan and no new significant impacts would occur.
The 2006 Addendum determined that while the intensity of resort and retail uses, and the amount of
traffic generated by these uses, would be greater than the amount assessed in the 2002 MND, no new
or more severe significant traffic impacts would result because the surrounding roadway network has
the capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the Specific Plan and impacts have been previously
analyzed during the 2002 General Plan update process.
Existing Conditions
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was prepared for the 2035 General Plan to assess the existing roadway
network, collect data on and measure the level of use and service along the existing roadways in the
General Plan study area. The traffic impact analysis also identifies potentially significant traffic -related
impacts associated with development of the uses allowed by the City's General Plan, and detailed
mitigation measures and strategies designed to reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than
significant.13 The TIA evaluated existing traffic operations in the City and analyzes impacts for the year
2035.
The La Quinta General Plan Traffic Analysis Model (LQTAM) is a detailed model developed in a manner
consistent with the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RivTAM), which is the basis for
13 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quin to General Plan (2013).
regional transportation planning efforts coordinated by Coachella Valley Association of Governments
(CVAG). The LQTAM consists of a traditional four -step modeling process including (1) trip generation, (2)
trip distribution, (3) mode split (choice), and (4) traffic assignment. Two model scenarios were included
in the LQTAM, a base year of 2009 and the forecast year 2035. To work from a more refined level, the
traffic modeling process begins with defining the traffic analysis zones (TAZ) and the roadway network,
establishing efficient/logical traffic routes, collecting land use and socio-economic data on each TAZ,
calculating trip generation in each TAZ, distributing traffic and its assignment to individual road
segments.14
The City has developed and maintains an extensive arterial roadway network, serving both local and
inter -city traffic. The City road network has been built essentially along a north -south grid with
interconnections with major arterials passing through adjacent jurisdictions.15 The Modified Project Site
is bounded by Jefferson Street, Avenue 52, and Avenue 54.
Jefferson Street is oriented in a north -south direction and consists of three lanes in each direction. It is
classified as a Major Arterial north of Avenue 54 and as a Modified Secondary Arterial between Avenue
58 and Avenue 62. Jefferson Street provides access to State Highway 111, southern parts of the City and
to Interstate 10 north of City limits. Current traffic volumes range from 12,000 to 27,000 vehicles per
day (VPD). Intersections with Jefferson Street are operating at LOS C or better and the roundabout at
Avenue 52 is operating at LOS A during the peak season. Mid -block segments operate at LOS A. The
2035 General Plan calculated 16,169 existing average daily trips (ADT) along Jefferson Street north of
Avenue 52 and 12,399 ADTs along Jefferson Street from Avenue 52 to Avenue 54.16
Avenue 52 is oriented in an east -west direction. Avenue 52 is classified as a Primary Arterial throughout
the City and the City's Sphere of Influence. Current traffic volumes range from 7,200 VPD west of
Monroe Street to about 16,100 VPD west of Washington Street. Intersections with Avenue 52 are
currently operating at LOS C or better during the peak season, with the exception of the Avenue 52
intersection with Avenida Bermudas, which is operating at LOS D. Mid -block segments are operating at
LOS A.17
Avenue 54 is an east -west street consisting of two lanes in each direction between Jefferson Street to
east of Monroe Street. Intersections with Avenue 52 are currently operating at LOS C or better, with the
exception of the Avenue 52 intersection with Avenida Bermudas, which is operating at LOS D. Roadway
14 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
15 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
16 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
17 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
segments are operating at LOS A during the peak season. There are 13,529 ADT along Avenue 52 from
Washington Street to Jefferson Street.18
Avenue 52 is designated as a Class 3 golf cart path west of SilverRock Way to Eisenhower Drive.
Analysis of Modified Project
The TIA prepared for the City's 2035 General Plan incorporated the full development of the uses
approved for the SilverRock Specific Plan. The 2035 General Plan calculates projected ADT volumes for
the year 2035. The 2035 General Plan peak season projected 35,143 ADT along Jefferson Street north of
Avenue 52; 31,532 ADT along Jefferson Street from Avenue 52 to Avenue 54; and 26,510 ADT along
Avenue 52 west of Monroe Street; 31,770 ADT along Avenue 52 from Washington Street to Jefferson
Street; and 16,133 ADT west of Washington Street.19 These 2035 projections included projected traffic
generated by the Modified Project.
The 2035 forecasted intersection LOS during the peak season based on the recommended intersection
improvements from the 2035 General Plan would result in LOS C during both peak hour periods at
Washington Street and Avenue 52; LOS C during the AM Peak Hour and LOS D during the PM Peak Hour
at Jefferson Street and Avenue 52; and LOS B during both peak hour periods with a new traffic signal at
Jefferson Street and Avenue 54. Therefore, mitigation measure 1 identified in the 2002 MND Project will
require that the developer provide a fair share of the cost to implement a traffic signal at Jefferson and
Avenue 54, as well as at SilverRock Way and Jefferson Street (if warranted). Traffic Mitigation Measure 1
requiring the installation of a traffic signal at SilverRock Way and Avenue 52 has been implemented.
The Modified Project would reduce the number of trips generated when compared to the Specific Plan
due to a reduction of land use intensities. The Modified Project includes 850 units and 65,000 square
feet of commercial space, while the Specific Plan allows up to 1,160 units and 190,000 square feet of
commercial space. The Modified Project would generate 15,683 ADT, which is 4,338 fewer ADT than
compared to the analysis prepared for the 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND. The Modified Project
would not exceed the capacity of the planned circulation system and would generate fewer trips as
compared to the Specific Plan.
The Modified Project proposes a resort environment including hotels, a spa, residential units, and a
mixed -use village, and civic park/entertainment area. The Modified Project would include design
features, such as the two circulation elements, the River Walk and the Promenade, featured in Planning
18 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
19 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quin to General Plan (2013).
Area 7, which would facilitate circulation and pedestrian safety throughout the resort. These two
circulation elements would include intersecting north —south and east —west pedestrian corridors with
connectivity to vehicular, non -vehicular, and pedestrian circulation routes within the Specific Plan Area.
The Modified Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses because the circulation pattern follows a similar
circulation route planned in the Specific Plan. The 2035 General Plan incorporated the Modified Project
in its analysis, and the Modified Project would not result in adequate emergency access.
The City's 2035 General Plan designates a new Class 1 golf cart/NEV path through the Specific Plan Area
from Washington Street to Jefferson Street south of Avenue 52. The designated Class 1 golf cart/NEV
path then continues along Jefferson Street to Avenue 54. A Class 2 golf cart/NEV path is also designated
from Washington Street to SilverRock Way which connects the Specific Plan Area to the rest of the City.
A proposed multi -purpose path is also designated through the Specific Plan Area from Washington
Street to Jefferson Street south of Avenue 52. The design of the Modified Project allows the connection
of the proposed City pedestrian, NEV, and bicycle paths.
Impacts associated with the Modified Project would be similar to those identified in the 2002 MND and
2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant with the incorporation of
mitigation measure 1 identified in the 2002 MND to include a signal at the Modified Project entrance
along Jefferson Street and a signal at Jefferson Street and Avenue 54, if warranted. No new information,
changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the Modified
Project.
3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Thresholds
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
The 2002 MND identified that the flat portion of the 2002 MND Project Site had historically been used
for agricultural purposes and the majority of this portion of site consisted of disturbed non-native
vegetation. Five vegetation communities were identified on the site including disturbed vegetation,
agricultural lands, tamarisk groves, desert saltbush scrub, and mesquite hummocks. The majority of the
2002 MND Project Site, approximately 440 acres, consisted of disturbed areas containing abandoned
citrus groves, sod fields, and ranch related buildings. Approximately 40 acres of the 2002 MND Project
Site was used to grow turf for golf course use. Tamarisk groves occupied approximately 8 acres of the
2002 MND Project Site. Native plant communities on the 2002 MND Project Site were limited to
approximately 8 acres of desert saltbush scrub and 3.4 acres of mesquite hummocks.
A series of biological surveys had been conducted on the 2002 MND Project Site between 1999 and
2002. Focused surveys for Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard, flat -tailed horned lizard, Coachella Valley
round -tailed ground squirrel, Palm Springs pocket mouse, Coachella Valley grasshopper and peninsular
bighorn sheep were conducted based on the recommendation of the USFWS and CDFG in 1999. None of
these species were observed on the site. All other sensitive species were surveyed for in conjunction
with these surveys or the previous surveys.
One species of special -concern, a Loggerhead shrike, was observed on the site during the 1999 surveys.
A second special -status species, the black -tailed gnatcatcher, was observed on an adjacent site during
1999 surveys and, for this reason, was considered to have a high potential to be present on the 2002
MND Project Site. Suitable habitat for these two species comprised very few acres and as the 2002 MND
Project Site was not likely to sustain a large population of either species, the potential impact to these
two bird species was not identified as significant.
The Santa Rosa Mountains historically provided habitat for peninsular bighorn sheep, a state- and
federally -listed endangered species. Focused surveys performed in 1999 found no evidence of bighorn
sheep in the vicinity of the 2002 MND Project Site. Essential habitat of the peninsular bighorn sheep in
this area was defined by the USFWS to include the Santa Rosa Mountains down to the toe -of -slope. As
no development was proposed to infringe above the toe -of -slope, no portion of the 2002 MND Project
Site would have been developed in the essential peninsular bighorn sheep habitat. Nonetheless,
mitigation measures were identified for the 2002 MND Project should peninsular bighorn sheep
encroach on to the 2002 MND Project Site. Mitigation measures 1 through 10 were found to mitigate
any potential significant impacts to bighorn sheep.
Seven special -status plant species were identified as known to occur in the general vicinity of the 2002
MND Project Site vicinity. A special -status plant survey was completed on the 2002 MND Project Site in
April 2000. No individuals or populations of Coachella Valley milk -vetch were found during these
focused surveys. In addition, no other special -status plant species were observed on the site during
these surveys.
One special -status vegetation community was identified within the 2002 MND Project Site. Mesquite
hummocks, defined as "partially stabilized desert sand fields" is identified as a threatened vegetation
community by the State. Two mesquite hummocks occupied approximately 3.4 acres of the 2002 MND
Project Site. These two hummocks had been degraded by trash dumping and off -road vehicle activity.
However, the loss of approximately 3.4 acres of this habitat type was identified as a potentially
significant impact. The 2002 MND identified mitigation to reduce this impact to a less than significant
level. Mitigation measure 11 required that prior to any construction or site preparation activities that
would impact the 3.4 acres of mesquite hummock, the agency or project developer shall enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Fish and Game (now the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife) and an appropriate non-profit organization whose purpose is
to acquire and manage land for the purpose of protecting special status plants and wildlife. The MOU
was to provide the organization chosen the financial resources necessary to purchase and manage 3.4
acres of mesquite hummock in the Willow Hole area or in another area where the habitat is contiguous
and large preserves already protect much of this habitat type. As discussed below, the requirements of
mitigation measure 11 has been fulfilled.
The 2002 MND identified that a total of 5.29 acres of potential wetlands that were present on the 2002
MND Project Site. A wetland delineation was completed in August 2000 and identified four potential
jurisdictional areas on the 2002 MND Project Site including a system of channels, a swale, and two
excavation retention basins. All of these features, except one of the excavated basins, were dry on the
surface at the time of the survey. No anaerobic soil indicators or hydrophytic plants were present at this
Swale. Because this wet area was the result of human activity and lacks two of the three characteristics
used to determine jurisdiction, it was unlikely that this feature is a jurisdictional wetland. The first of the
two retention basins was located at the northern portion of the 2002 MND Project area. This site was
inundated at the time of the delineation and was expected to be for the remainder of the year given the
presence of hydrophytic vegetation. The other retention basin was apparently used as water storage for
orange grove irrigation that occupies the northeastern corner of the site and was not inundated at the
time the delineation was performed in 2000. The soil was damp below the surface and there was slight
evidence of anaerobic soil conditions. The basin occupied approximately 1.8 acres and had an
assemblage of plants that narrowly met the hydrophytic plant criterion. The soil dampness and basin
topography contributed to the determination that wetland hydrology was present, but similar to the
other basin, the wetland delineation concluded that while these basins met the physical criteria of a
wetland, they might not be a jurisdictional feature because both were artificially created.
The 2002 MND determined that because development of the 2002 MND Project Site had the potential
to remove all or some of the potential wetlands on -site and because the area was regulated by state and
federal resource agencies, this loss could be considered a significant impact without the incorporation of
mitigation measures. The 2002 MND identified mitigation measure 11 to reduce impacts to less than
significant.
The 2002 MND Project Site was surrounded on two sides by mostly developed land, consisting of
residences, agricultural crops, and fallow or abandoned cropland. The Coral Reef Mountains bordered
the western edge of the 2002 MND Project Site and constitute a large, natural open space area. There
was one area adjacent to and east of the 2002 MND Project Site that contained some native scrub
habitat at the time the MND was prepared. This area was not directly connected to any large open
spaces and native habitat adjacent to it was patchy and disjunctive. Therefore, the 2002 MND identified
that the 2002 MND Project Site did not serve as a wildlife movement corridor between large open
spaces and potential impacts to wildlife movement were less than significant.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. A mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan has been prepared to protect peninsular
Bighorn Sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non -mountainous portion of the site proposed
for development. This concept plan illustrates a continuous buffer to the toe -of -slope in areas where
development could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The concept plan delineates the location,
acreage and native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. This plan shall be incorporated
into the project design and shall be subject to review by the City prior to the issuance of grading
permits. A copy of this mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan is available for review
at the City of La Quinta Community Development Department.
2. If Bighorn Sheep enter into the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between
the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3
inches) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent
fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If
the Department transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Department
shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future.
3. Dogs shall not be permitted to be loose within the Project area, and shall be kept away from the
hillside areas through appropriate signage and fencing, where applicable.
4. Access into the hillside area from the site will be discouraged through the use of signs or barricades,
if necessary, unless the access is provided as part of a trail system that is approved by the USFWS
and CDFG.
5. A construction plan shall be prepared and provide, to the extent practicable, construction activities
that emit excessive noise will be avoided adjacent to the hillside. In addition, during grading and
construction activities any blasting or pile -driving near the hillside will not occur during the period
from January 1 through June 30.
6. The final design of the Project shall insure that road and driveways are designed to minimize
headlight shine from vehicles onto the hillside.
7. In all areas adjacent to the hillsides, non -glare glass shall be used in new construction. Exterior
building lights shall not shine on the hillside. Exterior lighting shall be kept at the safest possible
minimum intensity and aimed away from the hillside.
8. The landscape plan shall include only plants that are non -toxic to wildlife. All exotic plans such as
tamarisk and fountain grass are prohibited. Existing trees may remain.
9. All swimming pools located in the Project Site shall be fenced pursuant to City regulations.
10. Efforts shall be made to ensure that all pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, and fertilizers used during
the construction and operation of the Project Site will not be harmful to wildlife.
11. Prior to any construction or site preparation activities that would impact the 3.4 acres of mesquite
hummock, the agency or project developer shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with CDFG and an appropriate non-profit organization whose purpose is to acquire and
manage land for the purpose of protecting special status plants and wildlife. This MOU shall provide
the organization chosen the financial resources necessary to purchase and manage 3.4 acres of
mesquite hummock in the Willow Hole area or in another area where the habitat is contiguous and
large preserves already protect much of this habitat type.
12. Prior to the commencement of on -site grading, a 404 permit shall be obtained, if legally required,
for alteration of areas under the Army Core of Engineers (ACOE) jurisdiction. In addition, if
development activities are to take place within streambeds or drainages under the jurisdiction of
the CDFG, a streambed alteration agreement shall first be obtained, if legally required.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
Subsequent to preparation of the 2002 MND, the entire site was mass graded and the Arnold Palmer
Classic Golf Course was built on the western portion of the site along the edge of the Santa Rosa
Mountains. Mitigation measure 12 was implemented prior to the commencement of on -site grading to
mitigate potential impacts to jurisdictional wetland habitat. The majority of the remainder of the site
was planted with barley as a dust control reduction measure.
As discussed in the 2002 MND, one special -status vegetation community, known as mesquite
hummocks, was identified within the Specific Plan Area and impacts to these hummocks was identified
as a significant impact. A non-profit organization purchased contiguous mesquite hummock habitat in
another area to offset the 3.4 acres of mesquite hummock on -site. Impacts to the mesquite hummocks
on the site were mitigated by implementation of mitigation measure 11.
Mitigation measures 1 through 10 were included in the 2002 MND to prevent peninsular bighorn sheep
from coming onto the 2006 Addendum Project Site. The 2006 Addendum identified that City staff was
working with the USFWS and CDFG regarding peninsular bighorn sheep sightings on and adjacent to the
Specific Plan Area and that, if needed, a peninsular bighorn sheep perimeter fence would be installed.
Implementation of these mitigation measures would mitigate any potential impacts to bighorn sheep to
a less than significant level.
Subsequent to adoption of the 2002 MND, construction of the Arnold Palmer Golf Course commenced.
As identified above, mitigation measures 11 and 12 were implemented to minimize biological impacts
identified in the 2002 MIND. The 2006 Addendum identified that mitigation measures 1 through 10 were
still applicable to the Specific Plan. Impacts to biological resources associated with the Specific Plan were
identified as being the same as those identified in the 2002 MND because potential impacts to biological
resources would be mitigated with implementation of the mitigation measures 1 through 10 identified
in the 2002 MND. No substantial changes from the 2002 MND were identified and no new information,
changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for the Specific Plan.
Existing Conditions
The Modified Project Site has been entirely graded and is currently partially developed with the Arnold
Palmer Classic Golf Course on the most western portion of the site along the edge of the Santa Rosa
Mountains. No riparian habitat is present on the Modified Project Site. The western boundary of the
Modified Project Site is located adjacent to the Santa Rosa Mountains, which provides habitat for the
peninsular bighorn sheep.
A comprehensive biological resources study was prepared for the General Plan Update in 2010.20 The
study identified that a total of 11 species in the Coachella Valley are now listed as threatened or
endangered by either the State or federal government. The CVMSHCP has been implemented since 2008
for the Coachella Valley and portions of the surrounding mountains to address sensitive species in the
area. An MOU was developed to govern the implementation of this conservation plan. The City is a
signatory and participant for the CVMSHCP. The CVMSHCP identifies conservation areas to conserve
over 240,000 acres of open space and protect 27 plant and animal species within the eastern portion of
Riverside County including the cities of Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio,
La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage. The Modified Project Site is located adjacent
to the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area. The CVMSHCP will be implemented
through the collection of fees from development, open space trust funds, and funding from some
permittees for infrastructure and development projects. The City collects a CVMSHCP fee for applicable
projects and collects the fee at permit issuance.
Analysis of Modified Project
The City's 2035 General Plan, adopted in 2013, identified that the rocky hillsides of the Santa Rosa
Mountains, including lands that occur in the southwestern portion of the City's Planning Area, provide
habitat for the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. Portions of these Planning area lands fall within the CVMSHCP
Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area. The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains
Conservation Area covers 272,000 acres located with the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains
National Monument boundaries. The western portion of the CVMSHCP planning area includes the Santa
Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. The CVMSHCP notes that bighorn sheep present in the Santa Rosa
Mountains may be indirectly impacted by development at the base of the mountain slopes. While
generally intolerant of human activity, bighorn sheep are susceptible to toxic plants associated with
landscaping, collision with vehicles, and parasites. Bighorn sheep have been known to abandon hillside
habitat as a result of human activities including hiking or other recreational activities.
20 City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta General Plan Update: Biological Resources (June 2010)
Bighorn sheep are a covered species within the CVMSCHP and development within or adjacent to
bighorn sheep habitat is subject to a variety of requirements set forth in the CVMSCHP. The Modified
Project Site is immediately adjacent to the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The 2002 MND identified
mitigation measures to protect the bighorn sheep. Mitigation measure 1 and 2 require a mountain toe -
of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan that would include the development of a fence to prevent
bighorn sheep access to the Modified Project Site. The plan would protect bighorn sheep and other
wildlife from entering the golf course and development areas.
The USFWS and the CDFW provided a notice to the City to express concerns regarding urban -related
impacts to the peninsular bighorn sheep in February 28, 2014.21 Specifically, the letter raised concerns
regarding observations of bighorn sheep regularly grazing within several golf resorts including the golf
course located within the Specific Plan Area. The bighorn sheep are using these areas to forage and to
possibly locate water. Pursuant to the CVMSHCP, when a written notice that bighorn sheep are using
artificial sources of water or food in unfenced areas of existing urban development within or near a
conservation area, a barrier (i.e. an 8-foot fence or functional equivalent) to sheep access is required to
be constructed within two years of the notice. The notice also requires that the City provide the Wildlife
Agencies (USFWS and CDFW) with a letter -report of actions taken to notify and work with golf resort
owners/managers to plan fence construction. This report is required to include a preliminary map of
fence locations, provisions for development, any CEQA analysis that may be required, and a timeline for
construction. At a minimum, the City will provide an appropriate barrier as deemed necessary and
accepted by the Wildlife Agencies. The City, in conjunction with the USFWS, CDFW, and CVAG, is
currently in discussions to prepare this plan.
The Modified Project Site has been graded and partially developed with the Arnold Palmer Golf Course.
The development of resort uses on previously graded areas would not have an adverse effect on any
sensitive natural community identified in the General Plan, the CVMSHCP, policies, and regulations or by
the CDFW or USFWS. The Modified Project will also include design features 6 and 9 identified in the
2035 General Plan to reduce potential impacts to sensitive biological species.
Any future development would be subject to compliance with specific goals and measures set forth in
the CVMSHCP. The Modified Project Site is not located directly within the CVMSHCP Conservation Areas,
but the Modified Project Site is located adjacent to the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains
21 Kennon A. Corey and David Elms, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Notification
that Peninsular Bighorn Sheep (Ovis Canadensis nelsoni) are using artificial sources of food in unfenced urban areas in the
City of La Quinto, Riverside County, California, letter (February 28, 2014).
Conservation Area. The Modified Project would be required to pay the CVMSHCP/Natural Community
Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee as required by design feature 1 identified in the 2035 General Plan.
Consequently, impacts associated with the Modified Project would be similar to those identified in the
2002 MND and 2006 Addendum and would be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation
measures 1 through 10 identified in the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum, as well as the incorporation of
design features 1, 6, and 9 identified in the 2035 General Plan. No new information, changed
circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the Modified Project.
The following design features would be incorporated into the Modified Project:
1. The City shall require payment of Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
mitigation fees prior to issuance of occupancy permits for development projects required to pay
such fees.
6. Prior to the issuance of any ground disturbing permit for qualifying projects in a Conservation Area,
the City shall require a protocol complaint survey for Burrowing Owl, in compliance with the MSHCP
Section 4.4.
9. In compliance with the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), and the City shall
continue to require that for development projects proposing removal of vegetation between March
and August, a qualified biologist shall be retained to determine whether any bird nests or young
occur on the site, and if they occur, to provide mitigation measures compliant with the MBTA.
3.8 ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Thresholds
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region
and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on
a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
Energy services are provided to the City from the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). The IID would be able
to supply electricity to future developments. All buildings planned for the 2002 MND Project were
required to conform to Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code, which requires energy efficient envelop
construction, equipment and fixtures. Landscaping and irrigation plans were recommended to be
reviewed to ensure implementation of water efficient measures and drought tolerant plants.
Furthermore, development of the 2002 MND Project was planned to be consistent with the General
Plan. The 2002 MND Project was anticipated to conform to all standard energy efficient building codes,
no significant impacts to energy consumption were found to occur.
Non-renewable resources, such as natural gas, petroleum products, petrochemical construction
materials, steel, copper and other metals, sand and gravel are considered to be commodities which are
available in a finite supply. The processes that created these resources occur over a long period of time.
Therefore, the replacement of these resources was not anticipated to occur over the life of the 2002
MND project. To varying degrees, these materials were all readily available and some materials, such as
sand and gravel, are abundant. Other commodities, such as metals, natural gas, and petroleum
products, were also readily available, but are finite in supply. If not consumed by the 2002 MND Project,
these resources were likely to be committed to other projects in the region intended to meet the
anticipated growth outlined in the General Plan. Furthermore, the investment of resources in the 2002
MND Project would have been typical of the level of investment normally required for a project of
similar scale. Provided that all standard building codes, including energy conservation standards, are
followed, no wasteful use of non-renewable resources was anticipated or identified in the 2002 MND.
Most of the developable areas in the City are located in areas with a minimal presence of significant
mineral deposits, and no impacts to mineral resources were identified in the 2002 MND for the 2002
MND Project.
The 2002 MND concluded the 2002 MND Project would have less than significant impacts in regards to
energy and mineral resources and no mitigation measures were identified.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
As identified in the 2002 MND, the IID has stated that they would be able to supply electricity to future
developments, including the resort and related uses that would be allowed by the Specific Plan. The
uses proposed in the Specific Plan were determined to be consistent with the City's General Plan. As all
future development permitted by the Specific Plan would conform to standard energy efficient building
codes, no significant impacts to energy consumption would occur.
If not consumed by this Specific Plan, non-renewable resources, such as natural gas, petroleum
products, petrochemical construction materials, steel, copper and other metals, sand and gravel, would
likely be committed to other projects in the region intended to meet the anticipated growth outlined in
the General Plan. Furthermore, the investment of resources in the development of the Specific Plan
would be typical of the level of investment normally required for a project of similar scale. Provided that
all standard building codes, including energy conservation standards, were followed, no wasteful use of
non-renewable resources was anticipated.
Energy and mineral resources impacts associated with the Specific Plan were the same as those
identified in the 2002 MND and were determined to be less than significant. No new information,
changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the Specific
Plan.
Existing Conditions
The City is located within the service boundaries of the IID. There are currently six substations located
within the City and the Sphere of Influence. The City's Municipal Code requires that all utilities in new
residential districts and subdivisions be undergrounded.22 As of January 1, 2010, all new construction of
residential and non-residential buildings in the City were required to abide by the Energy Efficiency
Standards implemented through California Building Code (CBC) Title 24. New homes are required to
include at least 50 percent of kitchen lighting to be LED, compact fluorescent or similar high efficiency
fixtures, as well as include double pane windows, cool roofs, and other design techniques to reduce heat
loss. Non-residential development is also subject to new more efficient requirements for mechanic
systems, outdoor lighting, sign lighting and refrigerated warehouses.23 The California Energy Code
(CEC), Part 6, Title 24, California Code of Regulations, was modified and contains additional energy
efficient requirements for new construction went into effect July 1, 2014.24
The Modified Project Site is located within the MRZ (Mineral Resource Zone)-1, which is defined as areas
where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is
judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.25
Analysis of Modified Project
The Modified Project would use less energy than the Specific Plan due to the reduction in intensity of
uses from 1,160 units allowed in the Specific Plan to 850 units generated by the Modified Project. The
Modified Project would comply with the Energy Efficiency Standards set forth in the CBC. Energy
22 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
23 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan, p. II-143 (2013).
24 City of La Quinta, "Building Code" (2014), http://www.la-quinta.org/your-government/community-development/building-
division/building-information/building-codes.
25 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Energy and Mineral Resources, Mineral Resource Zone Map, Exhibit III-1
(2013).
efficiency standards for development have increased since the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the
2002 MND, and the Modified Project would incorporate the latest CBC standards.
Since the Modified Project is located in the central portion of the City in areas designated MRZ-1,
implementation of the Modified Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally -important
mineral resource considered valuable in the region and state. Implementation of the Modified Project
would not result in the loss of availability of a mineral resource recovery sites delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan.
Energy impacts would be similar to impacts identified in the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the
2002 MND and would be less than significant. Mineral resources impacts associated with the Modified
Project would be the same as those identified in the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND
and would be less than significant. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts
would occur with the implementation of the Modified Project.
3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Thresholds
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code, Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or working in the project site?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project site?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the entire 2002 MND Project Site to
determine if any on- or off- site locations presented any specific hazard related impacts to the planned
development of the 2002 MND Project Site.26 No contamination of off -site locations was identified that
could impact the 2002 MND Project Site. The abandoned single-family residence located on the site was
investigated. It was determined that asbestos was present in some of the building materials. With the
proper demolition techniques, no impacts were anticipated to result from demolition.27 The 2002 MND
determined that impacts were less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measure 1.
Very low concentrations of benzene, toluene, and lead were detected at the former location of two
underground storage tanks. However, as these concentrations were very low and the underground
tanks were removed and closed by the appropriate regulatory agency at that time, no further study or
investigation was warranted.28 Impacts associated with hazards were determined to be less than
significant.
The 2002 MND Project included the proposed development of golf courses, a hotel, timeshare units, and
associated commercial uses. None of the planned uses posed a substantial risk of release of hazardous
materials. Furthermore, the planned uses did not pose any health hazard or potential health hazard to
onsite visitors or nearby adjacent residences. Impacts associated with hazards were assessed to be less
than significant.
The 2002 MND Project was not anticipated to interfere with any adopted emergency response or
evacuation plans, as the 2002 MND Project would not obstruct the existing or planned circulation
network. Impacts associated with hazards were determined to be less than significant.
26 Note: The Phase I site investigation was prepared for the entire site through two separate reports. One for the portion of
the site north of the Coachella Canal, while the second report was prepared on the portion of the site south of the
Coachella Canal. Both reports were prepared in February 2001.
27 Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Corporation, Environmental Site Assessment South Ranch
Property (February 2001).
28 Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Corporation, Environmental Site Assessment North Ranch
Property, February 2001.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. Prior to the demolition or renovation of the on -site family residence, asbestos -containing materials
(ACM) shall be removed in accordance with current regulatory guidelines.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
The 2006 Addendum identified that the Specific Plan would permit the development of golf courses,
hotel and casita units, and associated commercial uses. These types of uses were previously analyzed in
the 2002 MND. None of these planned uses would pose a substantial risk of release of hazardous
materials. Furthermore, the planned uses would not pose any health hazard or potential health hazard
to visitors or nearby residences.
The existing structures present on the site at the time the 2002 MND was prepared, including the
abandoned single-family residence and related agricultural buildings, have been demolished. Hazards
and hazardous material impacts associated with the Specific Plan were the same as those identified in
the 2002 MND and were determined to be less than significant. No new information, changed
circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the Specific Plan.
Existing Conditions
The City is an urbanized area located within the Coachella Valley and the potential for exposure to
hazards and hazardous materials is prevalent in urbanized regions.29 In order to coordinate efforts
relating to hazardous materials management, the County has developed a Hazardous Waste
Management Plan (HWMP), which addresses the proper disposal, processing, handling, storage and
treatment of hazardous materials. The City has also adopted the HWMP and implements it at the local
level.30
The City's Emergency Services Division is responsible for the community's preparedness and response to
natural and manmade disasters and emergencies. The City has prepared the Emergency Operations Plan
to plan and prepare for emergencies. La Quinta has also established Code Red, which is an ultra -high-
speed telephone communication service that provides emergency notifications to local residents during
emergencies. The City is also involved in the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program,
which educates volunteers in the community about disaster preparedness and trains them in basic
29 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
30 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan (2013).
disaster response skills. The CERT group is organized to support the City of La Quinta during emergencies
or disasters.
Hazardous materials are highly regulated by various government agencies, such as the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the California Highway Patrol (CHP), and the US Department of
Transportation, and cleanup and containment of these accidents is monitored by these same agencies.
Emergency evacuation and response plans, such as Code Red, are already developed in the City to
provide automated notification to residents during an emergency, including hazardous waste spills.31
The recently certified General Plan EIR discussed that fire hazards exist where wildland areas are
adjacent to or are intermixed with urbanized areas. Many of these wildland areas include rugged
topography with highly flammable vegetation.32 The City is situated at the base of the Santa Rosa
Mountains; however, these areas are considered low wildfire zones. The open space and wilderness
areas on the western portion of the City are made up primarily of granitic rock and sparse desert
vegetation. Therefore, there is limited vegetation to burn that could cause a major wildfire. The flat
urbanized areas of the City are considered very low wildfire areas.
Analysis of Modified Project
The only existing development on the Modified Project Site includes the Ahmanson House, acting as the
existing temporary Clubhouse, and the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course. Since the preparation of the
2006 Addendum, the one -site single family residence, known as the Ahmanson House, was renovated.
The previously identified single family residence on -site in 2006 has since been demolished and
removed from the site. Therefore, mitigation measure 1 is not required as there are no structures with
the potential for asbestos. None of the planned uses would pose a substantial risk of release of
hazardous materials. Furthermore, the planned uses would not pose any health hazard or potential
health hazard to visitors and nearby residences.
The Modified Project is located within approximately one mile of two underground storage tanks (UST),
one at the Oak Tree West property and the other at the Landmark Lease site. The Oak Tree West
property is included on the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) list and the Landmark Lease site is
included on the historical UST list. However, records show that the Oak Tree West site was satisfactorily
remediated and the site is listed as case closed. The Landmark Lease site has no reported violations. The
underground tanks were removed and closed by the appropriate regulatory agency at that time, no
31 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
32 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
further study or investigation was warranted.33 A prior Phase I was prepared for the site and indicated a
minor concern related to the presence of residual pesticides and herbicides related to previous
agricultural uses of the property. Recommendations in the report required a dilution of the upper
surface soil. Based on the 2014 Phase I, adequate blending and dilution of the residual pesticide and
herbicide has occurred of the site.
The Modified Project is not located within the vicinity of a public use airport or a private airstrip. The
nearest public use airport is the Bermuda Dunes Airport, located approximately 7 miles from the
Modified Project Site. Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, a County -owned public use airport, located
approximately 10 miles from the Modified Project site.
The City currently contracts with Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) for emergency services, and
the City's Emergency Services Division is responsible for preparing the community for natural and man-
made disasters and emergencies. The 2035 General Plan will facilitate new development, and therefore
will increase population throughout the City's limits. Any increase in population has the potential to
affect emergency response plans and emergency evacuation plans. However, the Modified Project will
not induce population growth.
The Modified Project is not anticipated to interfere with any adopted emergency response or evacuation
plans, since the Modified Project would not obstruct the existing or planned circulation network. The
Modified Project Site is located within a low wildfire zone and as such, wildland fire impacts would be
less than significant.34
Hazard and hazardous waste impacts associated with the Modified Project would be similar to those
identified in the 2002 MND and the 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and impacts would be less than
significant. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the
implementation of the Modified Project.
3.10 NOISE
Thresholds
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
33 Sladden Engineering, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, SilverRock Resort Property, SWC Avenue 52 and Jefferson
Street, La Quinta, California (July 15, 2014).
34 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan, Section 111 (2013), p. III-97.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise
levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project site to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project site to excessive noise levels?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
Construction
The 2002 MND identified that development of the 2002 MND Project Site would result in the generation
of noise during construction. The 2002 MND further determined that construction noise would occur
throughout site development with a majority of noise intensive activities occurring at the beginning of
the 2002 MND Project when the site was cleared and graded. Noise intensive activities typically involve
the use of heavy equipment, including scrapers, loaders, tractors, and concrete mixers. Trucks would be
used during construction to deliver equipment and building materials, as well as haul away waste
materials. Additionally, the 2002 MND noted that smaller equipment, including jack hammers, saws,
pneumatic tools, and hammers, would also be used during construction. This equipment would generate
steady state and episodic noise that would be heard on- and off -site. The noise generated during the
construction phase would typically affect the occupants of nearby residences; however, the majority of
development would take place at the interior of the site with activities for a planned golf course along
the exterior of the site.
At the time of the 2002 MND, the existing surrounding uses included a residential subdivision north of
the site and the PGA West golf course residential community south of the site. These residences would
only be subject to golf course construction noise, as opposed to heavy infrastructure and structural
construction. Additionally, the 2002 MND noted that a solid masonry wall shielded the residential
subdivision north of the site and would substantially reduce temporary, short-term construction noise
levels at the existing residences. The 2002 MND noted that construction activity would be short-term
and would not introduce adjacent uses to excessive noise levels. The 2002 MND identified that with the
incorporation of mitigation measures 1, 2 and 3, impacts associated with construction noise would be
reduced to less than significant.
Operation
The 2002 MND identified that a citywide roadway noise analysis was completed for the 2002 General
Plan EIR. Noise monitoring was conducted at the intersection of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street
adjacent to the 2002 MND Project Site. The community noise equivalent level (CNEL) was 64.7 A -
weighted decibels (dBA), measured 100 feet from the centerline. Noise levels were modeled based on
roadway volumes to calculate noise contours for existing conditions and future build out on roadways
adjacent to the 2002 MND Project Site. At that time, the projected future noise level along Jefferson
Street, south of Avenue 48, was 65 dBA 84 feet from the centerline. The analysis identified that the
future build out roadway noise levels were calculated along the same segments. The future build out
noise environment along this roadway segment was identical to the existing conditions. The planned
golf courses would effectively buffer the proposed resort uses from roadway noise levels from Jefferson
Street and Avenue 52. These noise sensitive uses would be located well outside the 65 dBA noise
contours projected for these roadways.
The 2002 MND identified surrounding uses, which included a residential subdivision to the north, vacant
land to the east, PGA west golf course and residential community to the south, and the mountains to
the west. These adjacent uses would not generate severe noise levels. The proposed golf courses were
planned to be developed on the 2002 MND Project edges and would serve as a buffer from adjacent
noise sources. Additionally, the golf course would also attenuate noise levels from the use proposed at
the interior of the 2002 MND Project Site to uses off -site. Therefore, the 2002 MND found that the 2002
MND Project would not introduce land uses that would generate excessive noise levels or expose people
to severe noise levels as a result of the 2002 MND Project.
The 2002 MND determined that design for the 2002 MND Project was consistent with the General Plan.
Uses that would generate any noticeable noises would be located in the interior of the 2002 MND
Project Site. The 2002 MND Project development would incorporate modern noise attenuation for
planned structures within the 2002 MND Project Site. Mitigation measures 4 and 5, impacts related to
operational roadway noise were determined to be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. Between May 1 and September 30, all construction activities on the Project Site shall only occur
between the hours of 6:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM
on Saturday, and shall be prohibited on Sundays and public holidays. Between October 1 and April
30, all construction activity on the Project Site shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and
5:30 PM Monday through Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, and shall be prohibited
on Sundays and public holidays. All operational activities of the SRR SP shall also be subject to the
Noise Ordinance of the City as well.
2. All construction equipment operating in the planning area shall be fitted with well -maintained
functional mufflers to limit noise emissions.
3. To the greatest extent feasible, earth moving and hauling routes shall be located away from existing
residences.
4. The design, selection, and placement of the mechanical equipment for various buildings shall
include consideration of the potential noise impact they may have on uses within the development
site.
5. Silencers and/or barriers shall be provided where necessary at outdoor equipment, such as cooling
towers, air cooled condensers and refrigeration compressors/condenser units, and at the air intake
and discharge openings for building ventilation systems.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
Construction
The 2006 Addendum determined that construction noise would occur throughout the period required to
fully develop the uses permitted by the Specific Plan. The 2006 Addendum identified that noise intensive
construction activities would include grading, as well as construction of internal roadways and related
sewer, water and other utility improvements. These construction activities typically involve the use of
heavy equipment, including scrapers, tractors, loaders, and concrete mixers, similar to the 2002 MND.
The 2006 Addendum identified surrounding uses, which included residential and golf course
communities to the north, east, and south of the Specific Plan Area. The majority of building
construction for the resort and retail village uses would take place in the interior of the site, since the
two planned golf courses would be located on the exterior portions of the site. The Hideaway residential
and golf club community located east of the Specific Plan is bordered by a large landscaped earthen
berm, and the Citrus residential and golf community located to the north of the 2006 Addendum Project
Site is shielded from the Specific Plan Area by a solid masonry wall. The PGA West community located to
the south of the 2006 Addendum Project Site also has landscape areas and walls that serve as buffers for
the community. The 2006 Addendum further discussed the substantial distances between the locations
where building construction would take place along with the existing walls and berms that act as noise
barriers for these surrounding residential uses would substantially reduce construction noise levels at
these surrounding uses. Additionally, the 2006 Addendum incorporated mitigation measures 1, 2, and 3
identified in the 2002 MND to reduce noise from construction to a less than significant level. No new
information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for the Specific Plan.
Operation
The 2006 Addendum identified surrounding uses that included residential and golf course communities
to the north, east and south of the SilverRock Specific Plan Area. The 2006 Addendum incorporated
information from the citywide roadway noise analysis completed as part of the City's 2002 General Plan
EIR. The 2006 Addendum also found that the planned golf courses would buffer the proposed resort
uses from roadway noise levels along Jefferson Street and Avenue 52. The 2006 Addendum further
noted that noise sensitive uses would be located outside the 65 dBA noise contours that were projected
for these roadways in the General Plan citywide noise analysis.
The 2006 Addendum determined that the Specific Plan would increase the amount of vehicle trips
generated when compared to the 2002 MND. The estimated number of trips generated by the Specific
Plan would be well below the projections for the Specific Plan Area in the General Plan and analyzed in
the EIR. Similar to the 2002 MND, the 2006 Addendum found that the Specific Plan would not introduce
land uses that would result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the 2006
Addendum Project vicinity.
The majority of building construction for the resort and retail village uses would take place in the
interior of the site, since the two planned golf courses are located on the exterior portions of the site.
The 2006 Addendum also found that the Specific Plan would not expose people to excessive noise levels,
since the Specific Plan would not introduce land uses that would generate severe noise levels. The 2006
Addendum identified that impacts associated with the Specific Plan would be the same as those that
were previously analyzed in the 2002 MND. The 2006 Addendum determined that operational noise
impacts were less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures 4 and 5 identified in
the 2002 MND. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for
the Specific Plan.
Existing Conditions
Construction
The La Quinta Municipal Code has established day and time restrictions on construction activities. La
Quinta Municipal Code Section 6.08.50 provides limits on construction activity during the day and is as
fol lows:35
"Between May 1 and September 30, all construction activities shall only occur between the hours
of 6:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday,
and shall be prohibited on Sundays and public holidays. Between October 1 and April 30, all
construction activity shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday
through Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, and shall be prohibited on Sundays
and public holidays."
Operation
The Modified Project Site includes an existing golf course and the Ahmanson House, which is currently
used as a Clubhouse for the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course. There are no sensitive uses located on -
site.
Existing noise levels along Jefferson Street are 66.0 dBA CNEL 100 feet from the centerline. The nearest
sensitive uses are residential uses at the Hideaway and PGA West. Noise levels along Avenue 52 west of
Jefferson Street are 65.9 dBA CNEL. The nearest sensitive use along Avenue 52 west of Jefferson Street
is residential use at The Citrus.
Noise standards in the City allow sensitive land uses to experience a maximum noise level of 65 dbA
CNEL in outdoor living areas (patios, balconies and rear yards). The noise contours provided in the
General Plan Update Noise Element Technical Report are based upon soft site conditions, and do not
account for noise barriers, topography, or final roadway grades that may affect ambient noise levels.36
35 La Quinta Municipal Code, sec. 6.08.050, Disturbances by Construction Noises.
36 City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta General Plan Update Noise Element Technical Report (June 2013) 41.
Analysis of Modified Project
Construction
The City's 2035 General Plan EIR determined that noise levels from heavy equipment can range from
approximately 68 dBA to 100 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. Noise levels diminish rapidly with a double of
distance from the noise source at a rate of approximately 6 dBA per doubling distance from the
construction site.37 Noise intensive construction activities would include grading, as well as construction
of internal roadways and related sewer, water and other utility improvements. These construction
activities typically involve the use of heavy equipment, including scrapers, tractors, loaders, and
concrete mixers. Construction of buildings within the planning areas would involve less heavy
equipment, but would still generate noise from the use of smaller equipment, including jackhammers,
pneumatic tools, saws, and hammers. This equipment would generate both steady state and episodic
noise that would be heard both on- and off -site.
The Modified Project would comply with the standards set forth by the La Quinta Municipal Code which
is also identified in mitigation measure 1. Furthermore, the surrounding uses, including the Hideaway
golf club and residential community, the Citrus golf course and residential community, and the PGA
West golf resort and residential community, have masonry walls which act as noise barriers and would
reduce temporary noise during construction.
Construction -related noise impacts would be similar to the impacts identified in the 2002 MND and
2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and with the incorporation of mitigation measures 1, 2, and 3.
Impacts would be less than significant and no new information, changed circumstances, or more severe
impacts were identified for the Modified Project.
Operation
Primary sources of noise throughout the City are caused primarily by motor vehicle traffic on City
streets, particularly major roadways.38 Other noise generators in the City include those associated with
commercial uses, including mechanical equipment, such as fans, motors, and compressors.
Motor vehicle traffic is the largest noise generator throughout the City. Existing ambient 10 minute
noise levels 100 feet west of Jefferson Street between Avenue 52 and Avenue 54 are 66.7 dBA with the
calculated ambient CNEL of 71.0 dBA. The noise levels did not take the barriers surrounding the nearby
37 City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta General Plan Update Noise Element Technical Report (June 2013) 54.
38 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
residential uses into account, so noise levels could be lower than projected. Effective noise attenuation
barriers can reduce noise levels by 10 to 15 decibels.39
The 2035 General Plan projected noise levels on streets adjacent to the Modified Project Site for 2035.
The 65 dBA CNEL noise contour along Jefferson Street between Avenue 52 and Avenue 53 would be 239
feet from the centerline. The CNEL noise level 100 feet from the centerline would be 70.7 dBA. The 65
dBA CNEL noise contour along Avenue 52 west of Jefferson Street would be 220 feet from the
centerline. The CNEL noise level 100 feet from the centerline would be 70.1 dBA. It should be noted that
the 2035 General Plan has incorporated the trips generated by the Specific Plan into account in its
projected 2035 build out conditions. As discussed in Section 3.6, Transportation/Circulation, the
Proposed Amendments would reduce the number of vehicle trips by 4,338 generated when compared
to the 2006 Addendum. It should also be noted that the trip generation along adjacent roadways was
included in the General Plan Update (as discussed in Section 3.6). The Modified Project would
reconfigure the proposed uses when compared to the Specific Plan. However, the vehicles entering and
exiting the site would follow similar trip distribution patterns as those identified for the 2006 Addendum
Project. Noise levels from vehicles would remain similar, albeit slightly reduced, as those noise levels
identified in the 2006 Addendum Project.
On -site sensitive uses include the hotel and resort residential units. These uses would be located
approximately 725 feet from the centerline of Jefferson and approximately 825 feet from Avenue 52.
The distance from the centerline between the golf courses surrounding the edges of the site and the
sensitive on -site uses would reduce noise levels below 65 dBA CNEL.
As discussed previously, the City's Municipal Code establishes base ambient noise level limits for noise
sensitive and other non-residential uses based on time of day. The Modified Project would include a
civic park/entertainment area be designed to accommodate outdoor functions and events. However,
the Modified Project would comply with the City's Municipal Code. The Modified Project would adhere
to the standards set forth by the Municipal Code and the General Plan Update, and result in a less than
significant impact.
The nearest public use airport is Bermuda Dunes Airport, located approximately 7 miles from the
Modified Project Site. The next closest airport is the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, a County -
owned public use airport, located approximately 10 miles from the Modified Project site. The Modified
Project is not located within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, and the Modified Project is
not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
39 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quin to General Plan (2013).
The impacts of the Modified Project would be consistent with the impacts identified in the 2002 MND
and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and with the incorporation of mitigation measures 4 and 5
identified in the 2002 MND. Operational noise impacts would be less than significant and no new
information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for the Modified Project.
3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES
Thresholds
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
• Fire Protection?
• Police Protection?
• Schools?
• Libraries?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
Fire Protection
The certified EIR for the 2002 General Plan analyzed fire service and the potential demand on fire
service through build out of the General Plan area. Fire service was, and is provided to the City by the
Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). Each individual project is subject to review by the RCFD to
ensure that adequate fire services would be provided to the project at the time of development.
Therefore, with the implementation of the mitigation measure 1, impacts to fire service were assessed
to be less than significant.
Police Protection
The certified EIR for the 2002 General Plan analyzed police protection and the potential demand on
police protection through build out of the General Plan area. Police protection was, and is, provided to
the City by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department (RCSD). As development throughout the planning
area continues, the demand on sheriff services in the City would continue to increase. Eventually,
without increased staffing and equipment, the police protection provided by the RCSD would no longer
be adequate. However, with the implementation of mitigation measure 2, impacts to police protection
were anticipated to be less than significant.
Schools
Two public school districts serve the City, which are the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD)
and the Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). Since the 2002 MND Project would introduce
seasonal residents, no additional students would have been added to the DSUSD. Although the payment
of applicable school fees would be required, no significant impacts to schools were anticipated to occur.
Libraries
The La Quinta Public Library is a branch of the Riverside County Library System. The 2002 MND Project
would not introduce any permanent residents. Consequently, no additional demand on public library
services was identified as library services are typically used by permanent residents. Any applicable
developer fees would have been paid prior to the issuance of building permits. No significant library
service impacts were anticipated to occur.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. The Riverside County Fire Department, in its review of new development proposals, shall evaluate
project plans and the Department's ability to provide proper fire protection. This review shall
include, but shall not be limited to, internal circulation, project directories, street names, and
numbering systems. New developments shall comply with all City and Fire Department standards.
2. The Riverside County Sheriff's Department shall review new development proposals in order to
evaluate project plans and the Department's ability to provide adequate police protection. This
review should include, but not be limited to internal circulation, project directories, street names,
and numbering systems. New developments shall comply with all established City and Sheriff
standards.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
Fire Protection
The 2006 Addendum identified that the average response time for the City's station as being
approximately 5 minutes. As development continues throughout the City and its Sphere of Influence,
increased demand would be placed on the existing fire services. Individual development projects are
reviewed by the RCFD to ensure that adequate fire services would be provided to the project at the time
of development.
The paramedic service provider for the City of La Quinta is American Medical Response (AMR). AMR
works in conjunction with local fire departments, police departments, and other public agencies to
provide paramedic services. The 2006 Addendum determined that impacts from development of the
uses allowed by the Specific Plan were the same as those identified in the 2002 MND and were less than
significant. Mitigation measure 1 was also identified in the 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND to reduce
potential impacts on RCFD to a less than significant impact. No new information, changed
circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for the Specific Plan.
Police Protection
In 2006, the RCSD maintained an average response time of 5 minutes with 3 sheriff units assigned to the
City of La Quinta, each with 1 or 2 deputies depending on the time of day. As additional development
occurs in the City, the demand on sheriff services in the City would continue to increase and additional
resources would be provided to meet the increased demand. Mitigation measure 2 was also identified in
the 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND to reduce potential impacts on RCSD to a less than significant
impact. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for the
Specific Plan.
Schools
The timeshare or hotel/condominium units that may be developed pursuant to this 2006 Addendum
Project are not likely to be used as permanent and primary residences based on market information,
however, historical use patterns for such units indicates that these units would be occupied on a
seasonal basis, as is typical for homes in resort communities in the Coachella Valley. Since the Specific
plan would permit hotel, timeshare, hotel/condominium and resort casitas units that would introduce
seasonal residents, no additional students would be added to the DSUSD. Although the payment of
applicable school fees would be required, no significant impacts to schools would occur. As a result, the
impacts of the uses allowed by the Specific Plan were determined to be consistent with the impacts
analyzed in the 2002 MND.
Libraries
The La Quinta Public Library was renovated and expanded since the 2002 MND was adopted. The
timeshare or hotel/condominium units that may be developed pursuant to this 2006 Addendum Project
are not likely to be used as permanent and primary residences based on market information, historical
use patterns for such units, and based on City requirements. As a result, the impacts of the uses allowed
by the Specific Plan were determined to be consistent with the impacts analyzed in the 2002 MND.
Existing Conditions
Fire Protection
Fire protection for the City is provided through a contract with the RCFD. The two closest City -owned
fire stations located within the City are staffed with both full-time paid and volunteer firefighters. Fire
Station Number 32 is located at 78-111 Avenue 52 and is equipped with both primary and reserve fire
engines, along with volunteer squad and rescue vehicles. Fire Station Number 70 is located at 54001
Madison Street and is equipped with a primary engine, a brush fire engine, and a volunteer squad
vehicle. Currently, average RCFD response times are between 5 and 7 minutes.
Police Protection
The City contracts with the RCSD for police staffing. The 2010-2011 City contract provided for 51 sworn
officers and 5 community service officers. There RCSD facilities are located within the City. One station is
located at 51-351 Avenida Bermudas and a business district office is located as 79-440 Corporate Center
Drive.
The RCSD maintains a staffing level of one staff per 1,000 population; however, the City does not
maintain a staffing ratio and staffing is based on the safety needs of the community and the available
resources to provide for safety needs. The City's 2010 full occupancy population of 59,427 would place
the current level of police staffing at 1.06 staff per 1,000 population.40
Schools
As mentioned previously, there are two public school districts, DSUSD and CVUSD that offer public
education to students in kindergarten through twelfth grade. DSUSD serves students living west of
Jefferson Street and north of Avenue 48. CVUSD serves students east of Jefferson Street and south of
Avenue 48.
40 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan, Public Services & Utilities, Law
Enforcement, Existing Conditions (2013), III-178.
Libraries
The La Quinta Library, a city -owned library facility, is located at 78-275 Calle Tampico and operated by
the County. The City's 2035 General Plan determined that existing library facilities are sufficient to serve
the current population.
Analysis of Modified Project
Fire Protection
Individual development projects are reviewed by the RCFD to ensure that adequate fire services would
be provided to the Project at the time of development. With the implementation of mitigation measure
1 identified in the 2002 MND, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Impacts of the
Proposed Agreements would be consistent with the impacts identified in the 2002 MND and 2006
Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant. The Modified Project will pay the
applicable fire protection Development Impact Fees as identified in the Development Agreement. No
new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation
of the Modified Project.
Police Protection
Individual development projects are reviewed by the RCSD to ensure that adequate police services
would be provided to the project at the time of development. Implementation of mitigation measure 2
identified in the 2002 MND would reduce potential RCSD impacts to less than significant. Impacts of the
Proposed Agreements would be consistent with the impacts identified in the 2002 MND and 2006
Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant. No new information, changed
circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the Modified Project.
Schools
The Proposed Agreements would generate seasonal population growth and would incrementally
introduce a small number of seasonal residents similar to those identified in the growth projections
identified in the City's 2035 General Plan. Although the payment of applicable school fees would be
required, no significant impacts to schools would occur. Impacts of the Proposed Agreements would be
consistent with the impacts identified in the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and
would be less than significant. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts
would occur with the implementation of the Modified Project.
Libraries
The Proposed Agreements would not introduce any permanent residents or result in permanent
population growth and would place a minimal demand on public library services. Impacts of the
Proposed Agreements would be consistent with the impacts identified in the 2002 MND and 2006
Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant. The Modified Project will pay the
applicable library development impact fee as identified in the Development Agreement. No new
information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of
the Modified Project.
3.12 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Thresholds
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion
of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
Energy
Energy services are provided to the City from IID. The Southern California Gas Company provides natural
gas service to the City. As identified in the City's General Plan, the IID will be able to provide electrical
service to the 2002 MND Project Site. Please refer back to Section 3.8, Energy and Mineral Resources
for more discussion on energy service. Mitigation measures 1 and 2 would minimize the 2002 MND
Project's impact on electrical and natural gas services.
Wastewater Services
The CVWD is responsible for wastewater treatment in the City of La Quinta. The City requires that all
new development finance its share of public utilities infrastructure and improvements required to
properly service the proposed development. With implementation of the mitigation measure 3 and 6
identified in the 2002 MND, impacts were anticipated to be less than significant with regards to
wastewater service. Furthermore, the 2002 MND identified mitigation measure 7 to remove all septic
tanks on site in accordance with Federal, State, and local regulations.
Storm Drain Infrastructure
The CVWD is the regional authority responsible for the management of storm waters within the
Coachella Valley, while the City is responsible for storm water management within the City boundaries.
Although never officially adopted, the City has prepared a storm water management plan that has been
used to direct future management plans and policies. The City's network of storm water drainage pipes
range in size from 18 to 60 inches in diameter. With the implementation of the mitigation measure 3
identified in the 2002 MND, impacts related drainage would have been reduced to a less than significant
level.
Water Services
The main source of potable water provided to the City is from an underground aquifer beneath the
valley. Irrigation water is supplied from this same aquifer and from the Colorado River via the Coachella
Canal, and is consumed generally in the area from Indio and La Quinta south to the Salton Sea.
According to the CVWD, there was ample water supply to serve the 2002 MND Project without
substantially or adversely changing the quantity, quality, or flow of groundwater resources. It was
determined that potable water could have been provided to the 2002 MND Project site by the CVWD
through the existing 12-inch water main located in Jefferson Street and 18-inch lines in Avenue 52.
It was also recommended that when possible, non -potable water supplies would be utilized for
construction purposes. This reduces the overall demand for potable water. During the construction
phases of development, non -potable water would be used to suppress dust generated by earthmoving
activities, the operation of vehicles on dirt surfaces, and exposed dirt surfaces. It was recommended
that this water would be obtained from the Coachella Canal. Water for irrigation of the golf course and
landscape setbacks (the vast majority of water demand by the 2002 MND Project) was to be obtained
from the Coachella Canal. In a continued effort to reduce the total amount of water either used or
wasted, specific water conservation measures for landscaping, irrigation, and plumbing controls were
recommended as conditions on the connection of the 2002 MND Project to CVWD facilities. In addition
to these CVWD conditions, other measures were recommended to mitigate potential impacts to a less
than significant level. The 2002 MND concluded that the 2002 MND Project would have no impacts in
regards to substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies.
Solid Waste
The City and the County had a contract with Waste Management of the Desert for the collection and
transport of solid waste to landfill sites. At the time of the 2002 MND Project, Waste Management
Services of the Desert transported solid waste generated in the City to the Edom Hill Landfill in the City
of Indio. The Edom Hill Landfill was permitted to accept up to 2,651 tons per day, with a remaining
capacity of approximately 1.5 million cubic yards. The Edom Hill Landfill site had an expected closure
date of January 1, 2020.41 At the time of the 2002 MND Project, the City achieved a 54 percent waste
diversion rate.42 It should be noted that since the 2002 MND Project was prepared, additional landfill
sites have been identified as available to accept solid waste from the City. Specifically, Azusa Land
Reclamation Co, Lamb Canyon Disposal Site, and the Spadra Sanitary Landfill were all available for waste
disposal from the 2002 MND Project Site.43 With the development of the proposed uses, total solid
waste generated from the City was expected to increase; however, given that additional landfill sites
were available for solid waste acceptance, and with continued waste diversion programs, solid waste
impacts associated with the 2002 MND Project were anticipated to be less than significant. With the
incorporation of mitigation measure 4 and 5, impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, the
2002 MND Project identified that the primary method of extending the life of the landfill sites was
effective waste diversion and recycling techniques.
41 California Integrated Waste Management Website (February 2002), http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/.
42 Most recent board approved data, 1998 California Integrated Waste Management Website (February 2002),
http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/.
43 California Integrated Waste Management Website (February 2002), http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. The most efficient furnaces, water heaters, pool heaters and other equipment that use natural gas
shall be used in project construction. The use of kitchen appliances that use natural gas and
alternative, renewable energy sources, including solar and wind turbine technologies shall also be
used to the greatest extent feasible.
2. Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, which addresses energy conservation in all proposed
uses, shall be strictly enforced in project design and construction.
3. All planned uses shall be connected to the city-wide sewer system.
4. A recycling program shall be developed for all proposed uses. Recycling provisions for commercial
and business establishments should include separate recycling bins. Items to be recycled at
commercial establishments may include white paper, computer legal paper, cardboard, and glass
and aluminum cans.
5. Professional landscaping services from companies which compost green waste shall be utilized.
6. The Project's fair share of public utilities, infrastructure and improvements required to properly
service the proposed uses shall be determined through consultation with the City Department of
Public Works in the Development Agreement and paid prior to the issuance of grading permits.
7. Any existing or historic septic systems located on the site shall be abandoned in accordance with
federal, state, and local laws and regulations prior to the issuance of building permits.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
Wastewater Services
As identified in the 2006 Addendum Project, the CVWD maintains a network of sewer trunk lines
throughout the City ranging in size from 4 to 24 inches in diameter. An 18-inch main line is located
adjacent to the Specific Plan Area in the Jefferson Street right-of-way. Wastewater is transported to one
of two treatment facilities operated by the CVWD. One facility, located at Madison Street and Avenue
38, treated approximately 2 million gallons per day, while the second facility, the Mid -Valley
Reclamation Plant located on Avenue 63, treated approximately 4 million gallons per day. These
facilities were identified to have the capacity to treat approximately 2.5 million and 5.8 million gallons
per day, respectively. The Mid -Valley Reclamation Plant would treat wastewater generated from the
Specific Plan Area. The 2006 Addendum referenced the 2002 General Plan EIR which stated that states
the capacity of the Mid -Valley Reclamation Plant was approximately 1.8 million gallons per day, and that
the plant was expected to receive a 20 percent increase in capacity over the next year, with adequate
capacity to serve the Specific Plan.44 The 2006 Addendum Project would also need to have adequate
transmission capacity to deliver wastewater to the Mid -Valley Reclamation Plant. The City requires that
all new development finance its share of public utilities infrastructure and improvements required to
properly service the proposed development. With implementation of the mitigation measure 6
identified in the 2002 MND, impacts were less than significant with regards to wastewater service.
The City entered into a Domestic Water and Sanitation System Installation and Irrigation Service
Agreement (Water Agreement) with the CVWD for the Specific Plan Area. This Water Agreement
requires that several local improvements be made to the water delivery system to provide service to the
Specific Plan Area. Proposed sewer improvements to be made as part of the Specific Plan included
construction of a 12 inch sewer main in SilverRock Way from the existing Ahmanson House to Avenue
54, a 27 inch sewer main to run west in SilverRock Way to Jefferson Street in the Jefferson Street Access
Road, and a 27 inch sewer main to connect to the 12 inch sewer main in SilverRock Way to an existing
pump station. Furthermore, the Water Agreement called for Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be
incorporated into the infrastructure improvement designs and construction in order to avoid potentially
adverse impacts due to the construction of these improvements. These improvements will all be
constructed in new or existing streets and no significant impacts will result for this reason.
Storm Drain Infrastructure
The City's network of storm water drainage pipes range in size from 18 to 60 inches in diameter. The
2006 Addendum Project would be required to minimize impacts on the City's local network of storm
drain pipes. With the implementation of the mitigation measure 3 identified in the 2002 MND, impacts
related drainage would have been reduced to a less than significant level.
Water Services
As previously discussed in the Water Agreement, proposed water infrastructure improvements to be
made as part of the Specific Plan include an 18 inch water main in SilverRock Way from the Ahmanson
House to Avenue 54, an 18 inch water main to run west from SilverRock Way to Jefferson Street in the
Jefferson Street Access Road, provide two water well sites, and provide a pressure reducing/boosting
station.
44 City of La Quinta, La Quin to General Plan Environmental Impact Report (2002).
Water and wastewater infrastructure improvements included in the Water Agreement would require
utility mains to be constructed in the southern portion of the Specific Plan Area, which is bisected by the
Coachella Canal. These mains would be constructed to run beneath the Coachella Canal, which is
approximately 8 feet deep. Designed sewer mains would be installed through bored casings that would
be at least 3 feet beneath the canal bottom. This sewer main design would not require special sewer
requirements from the CVWD. Water mains would be designed to run at bridge level. All utility
infrastructure improvement designs would comply with established CVWD standards and would be
subject to CVWD review and approval. With the implementation of the mitigation measures 3 and 6
identified in the 2002 MND Project, impacts would be less than significant with regards to wastewater
service.
As previously mentioned in Section 3.4, Water, the 2006 Addendum Project identified that the
increased intensity of uses in the Specific Plan, when compared to the 2002 MND Project, would result
in a nominal increase in water demand. The CVWD Board approved a Water Supply Assessment (WSA)
and Water Supply Verification (WSV) for the Specific Plan pursuant to Water Code section 10901 and
Government Code Section 66473.7. The WSA determined that the Specific Plan would have a demand of
2,361 acre-feet per year (AFY). This demand had been previously included and analyzed in the CVWD's
2005 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and was also analyzed in the 2002 Coachella Valley
Water Management Plan (CVWMP) as well as the EIR for the CVWMP. Based on this, the WSA and WSV
concluded that the CVWD had the current and future water supply necessary to provide water for the
Specific Plan and other existing and planned future uses that will be served by CVWD. Therefore,
existing and planned future water supplies will be sufficient to satisfy the demands of the 2006
Addendum Project in addition to existing and planned future uses. The impacts of the Specific Plan were
the same as those identified in the 2002 MND Project and were less than significant.
Solid Waste
The City and the County of Riverside have a solid waste service agreement with Burrtec Waste and
Recycling Services, LLC for the collection and transport of solid waste to landfill sites. The service
agreement between the City and Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC is negotiated every five
years. At the time the 2002 Certified General Plan EIR was prepared, Waste Management Services of the
Desert transported solid waste generated in the City to the Edom Hill Landfill in the City of Indio. Since
then, the Edom Hill Landfill had closed, and the Edom Hill Transfer Station was in operation and
accepted solid waste from the City. All waste received at the Edom Hill Transfer Station was transferred
to three landfills; Lambs Canyon Landfill near Beaumont, Badlands Landfill near Moreno Valley, and El
Sobrante Landfill near Corona. In addition, the Azusa Land Reclamation Co and the Spadra Sanitary
Landfill were available for waste disposal from the Specific Plan Area. With the development of the
proposed uses in the Specific Plan, total solid waste generated from the City was expected to increase;
however, given that additional landfill sites was available for solid waste acceptance, and with continued
waste diversion programs and the incorporation of mitigation measures 4 and 5, solid waste impacts
associated with the Specific Plan were less than significant.
The 2006 Addendum Project determined that impacts from development of the uses allowed by the
Specific Plan were the same as those identified in the 2002 MND Project and were less than significant.
Mitigation measure 7 would not be required as the site has been mass graded and any on -site septic
tanks have been removed. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were
identified for the Specific Plan.
Existing Conditions
Wastewater Services
Sewage generated within areas in the City located south of Miles Avenue is conveyed to the Mid -Valley
Water Reclamation Plant, located in Thermal.
Storm Drain Infrastructure
As previously discussed in the summary of findings in the 2006 Addendum Project, existing and
proposed golf courses within the Specific Plan Area have the sufficient capacity to accommodate
drainage without off -site drainage impacts.
The storm drain within Avenue 52 conveys water into the envelope of the proposed second golf course
along Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street to allow for percolation into the groundwater aquifer. The
Modified Project Site would incorporate similar amounts of open space as identified in the Specific Plan
to allow for percolation of water runoff into the aquifer.
Water Services
The Modified Project Site is located within the CVWD service area. The CVWD currently has
approximately 108,000 domestic water connections45 and pumped 109,488 acre-feet of groundwater
in 2010.46 However, the annual pumping supply is approximately 300,000 afy in a normal year and
fluctuates depending on water demand. CVWD provides services for domestic water, irrigation water,
sanitation collection, wastewater reclamation and recycling, imported water (recharging), stormwater
45 Coachella Valley Water District, 2013-2014 Annual Review, (June 2014), 17.
46 Coachella Valley Water District, 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, (June 2011), Table 4-6.
protection and agricultural drainage. The primary water supply for CVWD is groundwater from the
Whitewater River Subbasin in the Coachella Valley and supplements groundwater use with imported
water and use of reclaimed water. The 2012 Coachella Valley Water Management Plan Update
(CVWMP) identified that the Whitewater River Subbasin has an estimated storage capacity of
approximately 30 million acre-feet.47 In addition to groundwater, CVWD has additional water sources
including imported water, recycled water, and a small amount of surface water.
The Coachella Valley has been primarily dependent on groundwater as a source of domestic water
supply since the early part of the 20th century. The CVWMP and the annual CVWD Engineers Reports on
Groundwater Replenishment review the historical use of water in the Coachella Valley. In 1936,
groundwater use was 92,400 afy and increased continually to about 376,000 afy in 1999. Groundwater
use in 2009 dropped to about 358,700 afy due to a combination of water conservation efforts, source
substitution projects, and the effects of the ongoing economic recession.48 Deliveries of Colorado River
water and SWP water help offset this groundwater use. The Colorado River water deliveries are
currently approximately 444,000 afy, with SWP deliveries to the Coachella Valley currently at 194,100
afy over the same period. Total water supplies for 2015 would total 125,800 afy and for 2035 would
total 242,700 afy.
On January 17, 2014, Governor Jerry Brown Issued a Drought Declaration and requested a voluntary 20
percent reduction in urban water use Statewide. He also directed the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB) to adopt Emergency Regulations. As a result, on July 15, 2014, the SWRCB adopted
Emergency Regulations for Statewide Urban Water Conservation. These Emergency Regulations became
effective on July 28, 2014 and are contained in Title 23, Sections 863-865, of the California Code of
Regulations. The regulations will remain effective for 9 months and could be extended if drought
conditions persist. The regulations prohibit applying water to outdoor landscapes in a manner that
causes runoff such that water flows onto adjacent property, non -irrigated areas, private and public
walkways, roadways, parking lots, or structures; applying water to any hard surface including, but not
limited to, driveways, sidewalks, and asphalt; and using potable water in a fountain or other decorative
water feature, except where the water is part of a recirculating system. The regulations also require that
Urban Water Suppliers must move to the first mandatory level of water reduction designated in their
2010 Urban Water Management Plan. The CVWMP already addresses management of water use during
drought periods. For CVWD, the first mandatory level of water reduction designated in the CVWMP is
Stage 2, which requires a mandatory 10 percent reduction in water use.
47 Coachella Valley Water District, Coachella Valley Water Management Plan Update, Executive Summary (January 2012), p.
ES-1.
48 Coachella Valley Water District, Coachella Valley Water Management Plan 2010 Update (January, 2012).
Approximately 19 acres of the Coachella Canal,49 are located within the boundaries of the Modified
Project Site. Up to 97 percent of the Modified Project's water usage for irrigation purposes, which is by
far the majority of the total water demand for the Modified Project, may be obtained from the
Coachella Canal in accordance with the terms of the existing Water Agreement between the City and
CVWD. Indirectly, canal water will be used for groundwater recharge and source substitution
throughout the Coachella Valley.
CVWD provides water and sewer services to the City and the Specific Plan Area. Water to the Specific
Plan Area is provided by CVWD through the existing 18-inch water main beneath SilverRock Way.
Solid Waste
The City has a franchise agreement with Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC (Burrtec) for the
provision of solid waste disposal in the City and its Sphere of Influence. Non -hazardous household,
commercial and most non -hazardous industrial solid waste collected in the City is taken to the Edom Hill
Transfer Station in Cathedral City. From there, waste is transported to one of three landfills: the Lamb
Canyon regional landfill; El Sobrante Landfill; or the Badlands Landfill.
Analysis of Modified Project
Wastewater Services
Sewage generated from the Modified Project would be conveyed for treatment to the Mid -Valley Water
Reclamation Plant. The Mid -Valley plant has a current capacity of approximately 10 million gallons per
day (mgd) and processes an average of approximately 5 mgd per day. Given the excess capacity, there
are currently no plans for expansion at the Mid -Valley plant. The Specific Plan Area connects to the
existing CVWD sewer line system via a 12-inch sewer line. There are 18-inch diameter force mains in
Washington Street, Jefferson Street, Madison Street, and Avenues 50, 58, and 60.50 The Modified
Project would not require the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of
existing facilities as the Modified Project has already constructed the required sewer lines identified in
the Water Agreement discussed above. The Modified Project would result in less dense development on
the site, and the sewer line constructed for the 2006 Addendum Project was sized for more dense
development. Since development of the Modified Project would generate less wastewater then the
49 Note: The Coachella Canal is a branch of the All -American Canal that brings Colorado River water into the Imperial and
Coachella Valleys. This information is from Coachella Valley Water District, Coachella Valley Water Management Plan
Update, Section 4 - Existing Water Supplies (January 2012), p. 4-14.
50 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
2006 Addendum Project, the Modified Project not result in the plant exceeding sewage treatment
requirements.
Storm Drain Infrastructure
While the Proposed Agreements would result in less intense development when compared to the 2006
Addendum Project, the rearrangement of land uses would result in similar impacts to runoff as
identified in the 2006 Addendum. The Modified Project would not require or result in the construction
of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, per the Water Agreement, as
the Modified Project has already constructed the required facilities identified in the 2006 Addendum
Project to the 2002 MND Project.
Water Services
Domestic water is provided in the City by CVWD. Groundwater is the primary source for this water
supply, which CVWD extracts from the Whitewater River Subbasin by means of a system of deep wells
within the region. The Modified Project would generate a water demand of 2,194 acre-feet per year.51
This potable water demand is 167 less acre-feet per year than the approved demand of 2,361 acre-feet
per year for the WSA for the 2006 Addendum Project. As discussed above, the current drought condition
does not affect long-term water supply planning by CVWD because the CVWMP addresses management
of water use during drought periods, consistent with state law.
It should be noted that the CVWD water supplies have been reallocated resulting in fewer water
supplies and water demand since the approval of the 2006 WSA. The Modified Project will demand 1.7
percent of 2015 and 0.9 percent of 2035 water supplies, consistent with the findings in the 2006
Addendum Project to the 2002 MND Project.
Solid Waste
All solid waste generated by development within the Specific Plan Area would be taken to the Edom Hill
Transfer Station and transported to either the Lamb Canyon Landfill, Badlands Landfill, or the El
Sobrante Landfill. The annual disposal rate at the Lamb Canyon facility is 0.46 million tons per year. The
landfill is permitted to receive a maximum of 5,000 tons per day and it is projected that current landfill
51 540.6 acre-feet per year (residential) + 101.2 acre-feet per year (mixed use) + 1,453.1 acre-feet per year (open space) +
98.7 acre-feet per year (public park) = 2,193.6 acre-feet per year. CVWD, WSA and WSV for the proposed SilverRock Resort
Specific Plan, (2006) Table 3.1-1.
capacity will extend to 2021, but the Lamb Canyon landfill has potential for expansion. All of these
landfills currently have capacity for solid waste generated by the Proposed Agreements.52
Solid waste generated by construction and demolition sites may account for as much as 22 percent of
the solid waste stream. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City refers developers to Burrtec
environmental staff to develop a recycling plan to recycle at least 50 percent of these materials, as well
as required by mitigation measure 4.53 The Modified Project would comply with federal, State, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid waste (AB 341: California's 75 Percent Recycling Goal, SB 1016:
Diversion Compliance, Per Capita Disposal Rate, and AB 939: Integrated Waste Management Act).
Impacts associated with the Proposed Agreements would similar to those identified in the 2002 MND
Project and with the incorporation of mitigation measures 1 through 6, impacts would be less than
significant. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the
implementation of the Modified Project.
3.13 AESTHETICS
Thresholds
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
In the 2002 MND Project, the local mountains surrounding the 2002 MND Project Site were considered
scenic resources within the City. The 2002 MND Project identified that the Coral Reef Mountains, rising
up to 1,600 feet above sea level, are located along the western property boundary of the 2002 MND
Project Site. Design standards identified for the 2002 MND Project required that developments adjacent
to the Coral Reef Mountains maintain views from adjacent locations off -site. The 2002 MND identified
52 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
53 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan (2013).
that the 2002 MND Project's building heights, setbacks, scale, and architectural treatments maintained
views of the Coral Reef Mountains.
Jefferson Street was identified as a primary image corridor, Avenue 52 as a secondary image corridor,
and Avenue 54 as an image corridor. An image corridor is defined by the General Plan as a public right-
of-way along major arterials which provide views of scenic resources. The 2002 MND Project identified
that roadways with these classifications were required to be improved and maintained according to the
City's Municipal Code. Specifically, setbacks, landscaping materials and signage are all treatments that
are regulated through the City's Municipal Code. Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 are located adjacent to
the site. The 2002 MND identified mitigation measures 4, 6, and 7 to mitigate potential aesthetic
impacts along Jefferson Street and Avenue 52.
The 2002 MND did not identify any scenic resources on the 2002 MND Project Site. The 2002 MND
further identified that the 2002 MND Project Site was not located within or adjacent to a state scenic
highway. The 2002 MND determined that light and glare impacts were less than significant with the
incorporation of a mitigation measure 3 for lighting.
Although plans for individual development projects within the 2002 MND Project Site had not been
prepared yet, the 2002 MND Project would be designed and developed consistent with the General Plan
and City Municipal Code. These guidelines determine appropriate size, scale, treatment, heights, and
setbacks required for projects with specific land use designations and zoning classifications. Through the
implementation of mitigation measures 1 through 7 and the approval of Site Development Permits by
the Community Development Department, impacts associated with visual resources were determined to
be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. Landscape designs and materials that complement the native desert environment shall be utilized in
project design and construction.
2. Overhead utility lines shall be undergrounded to the greatest extent possible through the
establishment of an undergrounding program and guidelines subject to the review of the City
Engineer and Public Works Department
3. Outdoor lighting shall be limited to the minimum height, number of fixtures, and intensity needed to
provide sufficient security and identification in each development, making every reasonable effort
to protect the community's night skies, consistent with the City Dark Sky Ordinance.
4. Signage shall be limited to the locations, sizes, and maintenance requirements necessary to provide
functional identification.
5. Safe, convenient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, screened outdoor storage/loading and other
unsightly areas, protected and enhanced outdoor seating areas, appropriate lighting levels, limited
signage, and landscaping designs that preserve and enhance visual resources shall be included in the
design of any commercial area on the Project Site.
6. Development proposed along designated scenic highways, roadways and corridors shall be reviewed
for compatibility with the natural and built environments to assure maximum viewshed protection
and pedestrian and vehicular activity.
7. All grading and development proposed within scenic viewsheds shall be regulated to minimize
adverse impacts to these viewsheds. All grading, development, and landscaping plans shall be
submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
The 2006 Addendum did not identify any scenic resources on the Site and the 2006 Addendum Project
Site was not located within or adjacent to a state scenic highway.
The 2006 Addendum found that through the implementation of the mitigation measures 1 through 7
identified by 2002 MND and approval of Site Development Permits by the Community Development
Department, impacts associated with visual resources were less than significant. The 2006 Addendum
identified that light impacts would be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measure
3 for lighting identified in the 2002 MND. The 2006 Addendum found that the 2006 Addendum Project
would have less than significant light and glare impacts.
The 2006 Addendum determined that impacts from development of the uses allowed by the Specific
Plan were the same as those identified in the 2002 MND and were less than significant. No new
information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for the Specific Plan.
Existing Conditions
The existing visual character of the incorporated portions of the City is characterized as suburban.54 The
suburban character includes residential neighborhoods, commercial shopping centers, office parks, golf
54 City of La Quinta, Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quin to General Plan (2013).
courses, parks, and community facilities. Development within the City is generally lower density and
buildings within the City are typically low-rise structures.
The Modified Project Site is surrounded by a variety of land uses, including residential, commercial,
resort facilities, office parks, agricultural facilities, golf courses, and vacant land. The Modified Project
Site is located adjacent to two image corridors identified in City's 2035 General Plan. Jefferson Street
and Avenue 52 are identified as image corridors in the General Plan.
Scenic vistas surrounding the Modified Project Site include views of natural features, such as the Santa
Rosa Mountains. The Modified Project Site is located adjacent to the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto
Mountains, which are identified as a visual resource in the City's 2035 General Plan.
The Modified Project Site does not include scenic resources, consisting of trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings that are visible from a state scenic highway. There are currently no scenic highways
that run through the City.
Existing sources of light and glare are located near the Modified Project Site along major arterials, such
as Jefferson Street, produce light and glare from signalized intersections, street lamps, and vehicle
headlights. The Clubhouse within the Specific Plan Area produces minimal nighttime light for safety,
security, and operation.
Analysis of Modified Project
Design standards set forth in the Specific Plan require that developments adjacent to the Santa Rosa and
San Jacinto Mountains maintain views from adjacent locations off -site. These design standards
specifically deal with building height, setbacks, scale, and architectural treatments. The Modified Project
would include 2- to 3-story buildings that would allow views of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto
Mountains from the adjacent buildings and the public rights -of -way. Site plan review of the Modified
Project will ensure enforcement of the City's development standards. The Modified Project would not
obstruct views of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains and would result in less than significant
impacts, similar to the 2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND.
Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 are identified as image corridors in the General Plan. Roadways with
these classifications are required to be improved and maintained with appropriate setbacks, landscaping
materials, and signage according to the Specific Plan. The Modified Project would provide landscaping
and edge effects consistent with the uses to the north, east, and south of the Modified Project Site and
will be reviewed and enforced during site plan review.
There are no officially designated state scenic highways located within the City. Therefore, the Modified
Project would not substantially damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway. Furthermore,
the Modified Project Site does not contain scenic resources, including trees, rock outcroppings, or
historic buildings. The Modified Project Site includes the Ahmanson House, which was built after 1950
by previous owners of the property. However, the Ahmanson House has not been identified as a historic
landmark, according to the historic study conducted for the 2035 General Plan Update, and as discussed
in the Cultural Resources section. Therefore, the Modified Project would not substantially damage
scenic resources within a state scenic highway. Impacts to scenic resources along a state scenic highway
would be less than significant similar to the 2002 MND.
The Modified Project Site is currently occupied by the Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course and the
remaining portions of the Modified Project Site are undeveloped and vacant. The Modified Project
would develop these vacant portions and would improve the visual character of the undeveloped land
with resort uses. The Modified Project is surrounded by golf course and residential communities and
would develop a resort environment that would be compatible with its surrounding uses and the visual
character of the City. To ensure that the Modified Project would be visually compatible with surrounding
land uses to the north, east, and south, the Modified Project would incorporate mitigation measure 5
from the 2002 MND which would require a safe, convenient vehicular and pedestrian circulation,
screened outdoor storage/loading and other unsightly areas, protected and enhanced outdoor seating
area, appropriate lighting levels, limited signage, and landscaping designs. Therefore, the Modified
Project would be compatible with the visual character of the City.
The City has established a Dark Sky Ordinance, which states that any proposed lighting on a building or
parking lot shall be shielded so that light is projected downward and not onto adjacent properties or the
public right-of-way. The City requires that projects comply with this Ordinance. Mitigation measure 3
requires that lighting for the Modified Project comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance by ensuring that
lighting is projected downward and not into adjacent property or streets. The Modified Project would
not have additional impacts due to the creation of light and glare. Additionally, less development is
planned, which will result in less lighting and glare.
The aesthetic impacts of the Modified Project would be consistent with the impacts identified in the
2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant with the
incorporation of mitigation measures 1 through 7 identified in the 2002 MND. No new information,
changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Modified
Project.
3.14 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Thresholds
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
The 2002 MND identified site -specific historic and cultural issues that were addressed in a historic and
cultural study for the 2002 MND Project Site in September 1999. According to the site -specific study, no
structures on the 2002 MND Project Site were determined to have historic landmark status.
The 2002 MND identified the City as containing dense concentrations of archaeological sites. Eight of
the finds, known as isolates, were identified within the study area during the preparation of the Phase I
cultural resource investigation. Six of the isolates were associated with an archaeological site (CA-RIV-
2842) located outside of the 2002 MND Project area. The 2002 MND concluded that the area associated
with these six isolates should be considered archaeologically sensitive and that impacts to other
undiscovered isolates could occur during ground -disturbing construction work. The 2002 MND
determined that build out of uses would require earthwork to develop pads, contour new drainage
patterns, and involve trenching to install utilities. Based on the results of the site -specific Phase I survey,
the 2002 MND found that the 2002 MND Project would not significantly impact known resources on -
site. However, the 2002 MND did note the sensitive nature of the 2002 MND Project Site and the
potential to impact previously unidentified subsurface resources. The 2002 MND identified less than
significant impacts with the implementation of Mitigation measure 1.
If human remains are uncovered during ground -disturbing activities, all such activities within a 100-foot
radius of the find shall be halted immediately and the 2002 MND Project applicants' designated
representative shall be notified. Requirements for the discovery of human remains are addressed in
California Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5 and 7052 and California Public Resources Code
Section 5097. The 2002 MND Project applicant shall immediately notify the county coroner and a
qualified professional archaeologist. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human
remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or State lands (Health and Safety
Code Section 70S0.5[b]). If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he
or she must contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) by phone within 24 hours of
making that determination (Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]). The 2002 MND Project applicants'
responsibilities for acting upon notification of a discovery of Native American human remains are
identified in detail in the California Public Resources Code Section 5097.9. The City or its appointed
representative and the professional archaeologist are then required to contact the Most Likely
Descendant (MLD), as determined by the NAHC, regarding the remains. The MLD, in cooperation with
the property owner and the lead agencies, would then determine the ultimate disposition of the
remains.
Mitigation Measures Identified for 2002 MND
1. During any ground altering activities associated with project grading or construction, including
demolition of existing modern structures and facilities, the project area shall be monitored by a
qualified archaeological monitor and a qualified paleontological monitor shall be required in the
event of discovery of resources. The monitor shall have the authority to halt any activities impacting
potentially significant cultural resources until the resources can be evaluated for significant and
cleared or mitigated. The monitoring program shall also include consultation with the local Native
American representatives (e.g., Torres -Martinez and/or Morongo Reservations) consistent with
applicable statutes governing cultural resources.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
The 2006 Addendum identified two structures present in the Specific Plan Area. The first structure is the
Kennedy residential complex, which was built after 1950 by previous owners of the property, also
known as the Ahmanson House. The Ahmanson House is not a historic landmark, according to the site -
specific study conducted.
The 2006 Addendum referred back to the 2002 MND, which identified the sensitive archeological nature
of the 2006 Addendum Project Site and the historic and cultural study of September 1999. However,
since the 2002 MND was adopted, the entire 2006 Addendum Project Site was mass graded.
The 2006 Addendum found that the Specific Plan would not significantly impact known resources on -
site; however, given the site's sensitive nature, the development and buildout of the Specific Plan has
the potential to impact previously unidentified subsurface resources. The 2006 Addendum concluded
that the implementation of mitigation measure 1 would reduce impacts to less than significant. There is,
therefore, no substantial change from the 2006 Addendum Project that was subject to the 2002 MND.
No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the
implementation of the Specific Plan.
Existing Conditions
The City recently completed a Cultural Resources Technical Report for the General Plan 2010 Update
("2010 technical report").55 The 2010 technical report determined that more than 500 archaeological
sites, more than 280 buildings and other built -environment features, and more than 170 isolates, or
localities with fewer than three artifacts, have been recorded within the City or one -mile outside of the
area. The Modified Project Site does not contain historic resources and is not located immediately
adjacent to a historic resource.56 The nearest historic resource is located approximately 1.5 miles to the
west, but is separated from the Modified Project Site by the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains.
As noted in the 2006 Addendum, the entire site has been mass graded and the Arnold Palmer Classic
Golf Course is located on the most western portion of the site along the edge of the Santa Rosa
Mountains. Since the Modified Project Site has been graded and a portion of the site has been
developed, the area has already been disturbed by grading and construction activity.
Analysis of Modified Project
As discussed above, the Specific Plan Area does not contain any identified historical resources. No
impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Agreements.
The Specific Plan Area has been mass graded. Any potential discoveries of human remains or
archeological resources would have been identified during the development of the Arnold Palmer Golf
Course.
A Paleontological Resources Technical Report was completed in 2010 as part of a 2035 General Plan
Update.57 The 2010 Paleontological Resources Technical Report covered an approximately 37-square
mile area in and around the City. The Modified Project Site was identified as located in an area
designated "high paleontologic sensitivity." The 2035 General Plan EIR notes that new development
activity, including construction, grading, and other site disturbances in moderate and high sensitivity
areas has the potential to impact paleontological resources. Therefore, the Modified Project would
55 City of La Quinta, General Plan Update, Cultural Resources Technical Report (2010).
56 City of La Quinta, Historic Preservation, "Historic Resources Survey/Database and Map," Historic Resources Inventory
Database (2012).
57 City of La Quinta, General Plan Update, Paleontologic Resources Technical Report (2010).
implement Mitigation measure 1 identified in the 2002 MND in order to reduce potential impacts to
paleontological resources to less than significant.
Consequently, the impact of the Modified Project would be consistent with the impacts identified in the
2002 MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant. No new
information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the
Modified Project.
3.15 RECREATION
Thresholds
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Summary of Findings in 2002 MND
The City acquired the SilverRock resort site to provide two public golf courses, as well as a 9-hole public
course offering a junior golf program. Therefore, the 2002 MND Project would provide additional public
recreational services without increasing the City's population, which would have been considered a
beneficial impact of the 2002 MND Project. The 2002 MND Project would not have increased the
demand for neighborhood or regional park facilities, nor would it have affected existing recreational
opportunities. Therefore, no significant impacts to recreational facilities were identified.
The 2002 MND determined that the 2002 MND Project would have no impacts in regards to an increase
in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other facilities. The 2002 MND found that impacts
regarding existing recreational opportunities being affected by the 2002 MND Project were less than
significant.
Summary of Findings in 2006 Addendum
With the exception of Lake Cahuilla County Park, the 2006 Addendum identified that the City of La
Quinta is responsible for providing and maintaining public parks within the City. Existing public parks
within the City include the Fritz Burns Park, the Francis Hack Park, Seasons Park, Adams Park, the
Eisenhower Park in the Cove, the Desert Pride Park, the Community Park, and the Avenue 50 Sports
Complex.
California passed legislation (Section 66477 of the Government Code), which allowed a city to pass an
ordinance to require, as a condition of approval of a subdivision, the dedication of land or the payment
of a fee in lieu of dedication, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes. This
legislation, referred to as the "Quimby Act," establishes a standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents as
the amount of land necessary to meet the requirement for the provision of neighborhood and
community park land. Given the nature of the uses proposed, the 2006 Addendum Project identified
that the Specific Plan would generate seasonal residents and the Specific Plan introduced two public golf
courses and approximately 35 acres of public park space for seasonal residents for the 2006 Addendum
Project. Therefore, the Specific Plan provided additional public recreational services without increasing
the City's population, which would be considered a beneficial impact of the Specific Plan. The Specific
Plan did not increase the demand for neighborhood or regional park facilities, nor did it affect existing
recreational opportunities. Therefore, the 2006 Addendum identified that no significant impacts to
recreational facilities would occur.
Recreation impacts associated with the Specific Plan would be the same as those of the 2002 MND and
were determined to be less than significant. There is, therefore, no substantial change from the 2006
Addendum Project that was subject to the 2002 MND. No new information, changed circumstances, or
more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the Specific Plan.
Existing Conditions
The City owns and operates several park facilities and includes both active and passive recreational
opportunities for residents and visitors. Within the City are five mini parks, including Eisenhower Park,
Seasons Park, Saguaro Park, Desert Pride and Velasco Park. Neighborhood parks are larger than mini
parks and provide both active and passive recreational needs for the community. These include parks
such as Fritz Burns Park, Adams Park, Monticello Park, and Pioneer Park. The third type of city -operated
park includes community parks. There are three community parks in the City including the 16.75-acre La
Quinta Sports Complex, the 18-acre La Quinta Park, and the 17.5-acre Civic Center Campus.
There are approximately 5,259 acres of open space areas set aside for recreational facilities within the
City. These developed open -space recreational areas include a variety of City owned and maintained
parks and facilities, County of Riverside -owned parks, Desert Recreation District facilities, and public and
private golf courses. In addition, there are approximately 6,933 acres of natural open space areas within
the City, which offer hiking trails, equestrian trails, and other passive recreation opportunities. The City
also offers numerous golf courses and resorts, making it a destination for golf enthusiasts.
Analysis of Modified Project
The Modified Project would include two public golf courses along with additional public park space,
which would be considered recreational resources within the City, a 35-acre public park with private
amenities, and a 15-acre public park. As previously discussed, the Modified Project could generate a
minority of seasonal residents within the Specific Plan Area, as is typical for homes in resort
communities in the Coachella Valley. Quimby Act fees, or an in -lieu parkland fee, will be paid to the City
to offset potential resident use of parkland located outside of the Specific Plan Area. The existing Arnold
Palmer Golf Course would be modified to accommodate work to be performed on the Coachella Canal
and to accommodate the proposed Luxury Hotel. Therefore, the Modified Project would provide
additional public recreational services without increasing the City's population, which would have been
considered a beneficial impact of the Modified Project. The Modified Project would not result in
increased demand on neighborhood or regional park facilities, nor would it affect existing recreational
opportunities.
The impacts of the proposed Amendments would be consistent with the impacts identified in the 2002
MND and 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND and would be less than significant. No new information,
changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Modified
Project.
3.16 GREENHOUSE GASES
Thresholds
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases?
Existing Conditions
The California State Legislature enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions
Act of 2006. AB 32 focuses on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in California. GHGs, as defined
under AB 32, include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, NOx, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and
sulfur hexafluoride. AB 32 requires that GHGs emitted in California be reduced to 1990 levels by the year
2020. The performance standard identified in the 2014 Updated Scoping Plan' recommends a 15
percent reduction from business as usual by 2020. The identified GHG reduction goals include 30
percent reduction from 1990 levels by 2020 (of which the State has currently reduced 15 percent), 40
percent by 2030, 60 percent by 2040, and 80 percent by 2050 from 1990 business as usual levels. The
2014 Updated Scoping Plan, CARB encourages local governments and air districts to meet the 15
percent reduction below today's level by 2020 to ensure that their municipal and community -wide
emissions match the State's reduction target.
The City adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GGRP) in order to meet the requirements of AB 32.
The GGRP establishes current emissions and sets targets for long-term reductions. The GGRP includes a
comprehensive inventory of greenhouse gas emissions generated City-wide, including those generated
by local government activities. Future emissions of greenhouse gases are projected, reduction targets
set, and policies and programs are proposed as part of the GGRP in order for the City to meet mandated
reductions. To be consistent with AB 32, the reduction target is to achieve 1990 level emissions by 2020,
and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.58 Pursuant to AB 32, ARB established statewide 1990
greenhouse gas emissions as 427 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MMTCO2e).59
Community -wide activities in the City generated an estimated 1,228,050 metric tons of carbon dioxide
equivalents (MTCO2e) in 2005.
Analysis of 2006 Addendum Project and Proposed Project
Construction
As presented in Table 3.16-1, Construction GHG Emissions, construction activities associated with the
Modified Project would generate 8,595.1 MTCO2e GHG emissions. The SCAQMD recommends
annualizing construction -related GHG emissions over a project's lifetime, defined as a 30-year period, in
order to include these emissions as part of the annual total operational emissions. Therefore,
construction -related GHG emissions have been annualized over this period and included in the annual
operational emissions.
Construction activities associated with the approved Specific Plan would generate a similar amount of
GHG emissions as those for the Modified Project, as shown in Table 3.16-1. GHG emissions would be
similar because
58 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan (2013).
59 California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, "California 1990 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Level and
2020 Limit (2014), http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/19901evel/19901eve1.htm.
Table 3.16-1
Construction GHG Emissions
Year
CO2e Emissions
(Metric Tons per Year)
Modified Project
2006 Addendum Project
2016
520.6
20.
2017
767.0
767.0
2018
757.3
757.3
2019
1,068.0
1,068.0
2020
1,222.7
1,222.7
2021
1,209.5
1,209.5
2022
1,196.6
1,196.6
2023
963.8
963.8
Total Construction GHG 7,705.9 7,705.9
Emissions*
Annualized over Project 256.9 256.9
Lifetime
Source: CaIEEMod Emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A, AQ and GHG Emissions Calculations.
Note: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.
Abbreviations: MTCO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions.
*N20 emissions account for 0.35 MTCO2e/year.
Operation
A summary of the annual operational emissions of both the Modified Project and the 2006 Addendum
Project is provided in Table 3.16-2, Operational GHG Emissions. The operation estimates represent
emissions with incorporation of the standard design features identified in the City's 2035 General Plan
during operation of the Modified Project. The operation estimates represent business as usual
operations during operation of the 2006 Addendum Project, as shown in Table 3.16-2.
To provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA
documents, SCAQMD staff has proposed a tiered series of thresholds to be applied based on the amount
of GHG emissions generated by a proposed project and the type of project. The first tier does not apply
to the Modified Project because the project is not categorically exempt from CEQA. The second tier
threshold of significance is applied if the project is subject to an adopted GHG reduction plan. The City
has adopted a GGRP which applies to the Modified Project. The analysis presented below compares the
Modified Project's GHG emission reductions from the 2006 Addendum Project, or business as usual,
GHG emissions. The Modified Project's GHG emission reduction will then be compared to the City's
GGRP reduction targets.
Table 3.16-2
Operational GHG Emissions
Emissions
GHG Emissions Source (MTCO2e/year)
2006 Addendum
Modified Project Project
Construction (amortized) 256.9 256.9
Operational (mobile) sources* 4,411.8 7,385.0
Area sources 542.3 542.3
Energy 4,216.9 5,112.5
Waste 101.6 406.3
Water 874.2 1,100.5
Annual Total 10,403.7 14,803.5
Source: CalEEMod Emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A, AQ and GHG Emissions Calculations.
Notes: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.
Abbreviations: MTCO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions.
*N20 emissions account for 0.18 and 0.30 MTCO2e/year, respectively.
The following design features would be incorporated into the Modified Project:
1. Landscaping designs shall incorporate the use of trees or other vegetation to maximize the
shading of buildings in order to reduce energy requirements for heating and cooling and provide
carbon storage.
2. Desert landscaping techniques shall be utilized, including the use of automated water efficient
irrigation systems and devices.
3. Smart scalping practices shall be implemented during to minimize fugitive dust emissions and
reduce water demands.
4. Building designs shall meet or exceed the current Title 24 requirements or achieve LEED or
Energy Star standard equivalence ratings or better; buildings shall be equipped with energy
efficient and water conserving appliances and fixtures; building design shall include natural
lighting and ventilation; and light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavement shall be utilized.
5. New buildings and substantial remodels including new roofs, should be designed to
accommodate rooftop photovoltaic, above parking solar, or incorporate solar control into the
architectural design to reduce window exposure to direct sunlight.
6. Recycling and composting facilities and programs shall be readily available for all new and
existing land uses and every effort shall be made to divert the landfill waste stream.
The following design strategies will reduce reliance on traditional automobiles for transportation:
1. Promote the use of electric vehicles and alternative modes of transport by providing safe and
convenient bicycle, scooter and other non -motorized transport travel lanes, and parking, as well
as preferential plug-in stations for electric vehicle parking.
3. Assure all new development has safe and convenient access to public transit routes that include
seated, shaded bus stop areas.
4. Incorporate recreational open space adjacent to or as part of residential land uses.
Community -wide activities in the City generated an estimated 1,228,050 MTCO2e in 2005. As such, the
targets set forth in the GGRP are to achieve 10 percent below 2005 emission levels by 2020 and 28
percent below 2005 levels by 2035.60 To reach these targets, the GGRP includes a wide range of
implementation tools which can be implemented by City officials, residents, and business owners. As
shown in Table 3.16-2, the operational GHG emissions for the Modified Project with design features
would be 10,403.7 MTCO2e per year. The operational GHG emissions for the 2006 Addendum Project,
which are the business as usual GHG emissions, would result in 14,803.5 MTCO2e per year. The
Modified Project would reduce GHG emissions by 4,399.8 MTCO2e per year, approximately 30 percent,
from the business as usual scenario. Therefore, GHG emissions generated by the Modified Project would
be consistent with the targets set forth in the GGRP by achieving 10 percent below 2005 emissions levels
by 2020 and 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2035. Impacts would be less than significant.
Conflict with an Applicable Plan, Policy or Regulation
The GGRP sets targets and identifies reduction measures to ensure that the City is consistent with AB 32
goals of reducing GHG emissions by 2020 and 2035. As previously identified, the GGRP identified that
the City would need to achieve a 10 percent reduction from 2005 levels by 2020 and 28 percent
reduction from 2005 levels by 2035. The business as usual scenario would result in GHG emissions
(without Title 24 efficiencies or mitigation measures) of 14,803.5 MTCO2e per year.61 As indicated in
Table 3.16-2, the Modified Project would result in 10,403.7 MTCO2e per year with mitigation measures.
The mitigation measures would reduce GHG emissions by 4,399.8 MTCO2e per year, approximately 30
percent, from the 2006 Addendum Project business as usual scenario. The Modified Project would be
consistent with the goals of AB 32 and the GGRP set forth by the City for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases by 10 percent below 2005 levels and by 28 percent below 2005 levels in
2035. The Modified Project would not conflict with AB 32 or the GGRP. Impacts would be less than
significant.
60 City of La Quinta, La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Air Quality.
61 286.5 MTCO2e per year BAU Construction + 0.16 MTCO2e per year N20 + 14,851.6 per year BAU = 15,138.3 MTCO2e per
year BAU
4.0 REFERENCES
California Department of Conservation. California Geological Survey. Update of Mineral Land
Classification for Portland Cement Concrete -Grade Aggregate in the Palm Springs Production -
Consumption Region. Special Report 198. 2007.
California Environmental Protection Agency. Air Resources Board. "California 1990 Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Level and 2020 Limit. 2014.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/1990level/1990level.htm.
California Integrated Waste Management Website. February 2002. http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/.
CEQA Guidelines, sec. 15162-15164.
City of La Quinta. City of La Quinta General Plan Update: Biological Resources. June 2010.
City of La Quinta. Cultural Resources Technical Report. City of La Quinta General Plan 2010 Update. 2010.
City of La Quinta. Environmental Impact Report for the City of La Quinta General Plan. 2013.
City of La Quinta. Historic Preservation. "Historic Resources Survey/Database and Map." Historic
Resources Inventory Database. 2012.
City of La Quinta. La Quinta 2035 General Plan. 2013.
City of La Quinta. La Quinta General Plan Environmental Impact Report. 2002.
City of La Quinta. Paleontologic Resources Technical Report: City of La Quinta General Plan 2010 Update.
2010.
City of La Quinta. SilverRock Resort Specific Plan. 2006.
City of La Quinta. Technical Background Report to the Safety Element of the La Quinta 2035 General Plan
Update. Seismic Hazards, Geologic Hazards, Flooding Hazards. June 2010.
Coachella Valley Water District. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2011.
Coachella Valley Water District. 2013-2014 Annual Review. June 2014.
Coachella Valley Water District. Coachella Valley Water Management Plan Update. January 2012.
Corey, Kennon A., and David Elms. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and
Wildlife. Notification that Peninsular Bighorn Sheep (Ovis Canadensis nelsoni) are using artificial
sources of food in unfenced urban areas in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California
Letter. February 28, 2014.
La Quinta Municipal Code, sec. 6.08.060. Disturbances by Construction Noises.
Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Corporation. Environmental Site Assessment
North Ranch Property. February 2001.
Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Corporation. Environmental Site Assessment
South Ranch Property. February 2001.
Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Corporation. Limited Geotechnical
Investigation. November 1999.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 402, Nuisance. Adopted May 7, 1976.
APPENDIX A
AQ and GHG Emissions Calculations
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
SilverRock Addendum
Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
10.00 i
1000sgft
; 0.23 10,000.00
0
--
General Office Building
_------------------------------
71.00 +
-----------------------------------
1000sgft ; 2.50 71,000.00 -+
-------
0
-----------------------------
General Office Building
------------------------------_
5.00 +
----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
1000sgft ; 0.11 5,000.00 - 1
- -- - - --
0
-----------------------------_
Other Asphalt Surfaces
------------------------------_
37.00 +
------------------ -- -- ----- -- -------------- - - - - ------- - - - - --
Acre ; 37.00 0.00 - 1
-- - - - --
0
------------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------------
User Defined Recreational
4.00 +
---- --------;-----------
User Defined Unit ; 4.00 0.00 - 1
--- - - --
0
-----------------------------_-
CityPark
-----------------------------_
35.00 +
-----------------------------------------------------i----- - - - - --
Acre ; 35.00 0.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Golf Course
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
134.50 +
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------- 1- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Acre ; 134.50 5,000.00 - 1
- - - - - - -
0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ _ . - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _-- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 1- - - - - - - - - - - -
- . _ _ _ _ _
Golf Course
15.00 +
Acre
; 15.00 0.00 1
0
------------------------------_
Hotel
-------------------------------
140.00
------------------------------ =--------------- -------- - - - - --
Room ; 17.00 166,400.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
+
-------------------------------
Hotel
------------------------------_
200.00
------------------------------=----------------- -------- - - - - --
Room ; 10.00 169,700.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
+
--- ---- - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_------------------------------
Quality Restaurant
5.00 +
---- -------- --------- -;-------------
1000sgft ; 0.11 5,000.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
-----------------------------_-
-----------------------------_
----------------- --- -- ----- --------------- - - - - ---------- - - - - -- -+
- - - - --
artments Mid Rise
Apartments
150.00
+ Dwelling Unit
; 10.50 150,000.00
270
-----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------------
Apartments
artments Mid Rise
80.00 +
---- --------;-------------
Dwelling Unit ; 2.11 75,000.00 -+
-- - - --
144
--------- - --- - -- ----------_-
Single FamilyHousing
-----------------------------_
255.00 +
-----------------------------------------------------i-------- - - - - --
Dwelling Unit ; 56.50 459,000.00 -+
- - - - --
824
Strip Mall
35.00
1000sgft
25.50 35,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 3.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 20
Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
CO2Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - PA 1: 10,000 sf conference room, 15 acres modified existing golfcourse; PA 2: 140 hotel rooms; PA 3: 35 single family units; PA 4: 71,000 sf shared
services/conference center;
PA 5 200 hotel rooms; PA 6: 60 luxury branded units; PA 7: 25,000 sf retail, 150 apartment units;
PA 8: 160 units; PA 9: 15,000 sf retail, 80 apartment units; PA 10: 5,000 sf new clubhouse, 134.5 acre golf course
PA 11: 35 acre park; PA 12: 4 acres trails, 37 acres streets/landscaping
Construction Phase - Based on estimated construction schedule of 8 years
Trips and VMT - Per CalEEMod User's Guide for trip generation
On -road Fugitive Dust - Assume Paved Roads
Grading -
Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Trips - Water Well Sites and All American Canal
Road Dust - Paved Roads
Woodstoves - No woodstoves
Area Coating - No negative
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater -
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - Tier 3 required per CARB. SCAQMD Rule 403 and 403.1.
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 1113
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaMitigation•UseLowVOCPaintNonresidential ExteriorV- 250 50
alue
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
tblAreaMitigation
• UseLowVOCPai ntNon residential I nteriorV • 250
50
alue
----------------g------------
tblAreaMiti ation
+------------------------------f-------------------------------
• UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorValu 250 i
--------------------------
50
• -------e-------------
+
}-------------
t----------------
-------------
tblAreaMiti ation
g
• UseLowVOCPaintResidentiallnteriorValu
i 250 i
50
------------- --- ----- --- -----+-
e
- --------------------------
I
- ¢-----------------------------
--------------------------
tblConstDustMiti ation
Clean Paved Road PercentReduction
a 0
80
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ �
--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
°v 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
1.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------j�--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
a 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
T 0.00
3.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
------------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
T 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------$--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------+------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
°v 0.00
2.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
4.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
i 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
9.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----------------- -------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
} No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier
------------ ------ ------ ------ �
s No Change
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------------ ------ ------ ------ �
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------+------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
-----------------------------
s No Change
--------------------------
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-} ----- ------ ------------------ -4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
i No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------_------------------------------j�------------------------------4--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
a No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------_------------------------------
------------------------------4
--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
v No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
-----------------------------
Tier
-�------------------------------4--------------------------
? No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
} No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
-------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
-
; Tier
----------------4--------------------------
v No Change ;
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------
4 No Change
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier 3
_-----_tblConstructionPhase ----------------------
____________NumDays--_---__----�-----------------------------T--------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
; NumDays
6,200.00
1,161.00
-----------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
------------------------------
NumDa s
------------------------------4--------------------------
°v 440.00
43.00
____-_-tblConstructionPhase ______
_________PhaseEndDate__--_--------------------
------------T-___--___----
--------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseEndDate
i023
4
10/2/2023
10/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
4
4/18/2019
4/19/2019
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseEndDate
$ 2/21/2024
12/20/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
10/2/2023
8/1/2019
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseStartDate
4
- 4/20/2019
4/19/2019
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
12/2/2016
12/3/2016
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
4 12/23/2023
10/23/2023
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWood Mass
4
i 457.60
0.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------
FireplaceWood Mass
------------------------------ 4
i 457.60
0.00
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
tblFire laces
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . . . _ - .. . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ .
NumberWood
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
s 25.50
_ _ _ _ . _ . _ . - . . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
Land UseS- uareFeet
_�----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -4
1,611,720.00
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
0.00
-----------------------------+-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Land UseSquareFeet
------------------------------4--------------------------
°v 174,240.00
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _.. _ _ _ . .. _ . . . .
Land UseS- uareFeet
_L----- ------------------------ t
fi 1,524,600.00
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
0.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
_-----------------------------}------------------------------4--------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
i 5,858,820.00
5,000.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
------------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
------------------------------4
v 653,400.00
--------------------------
0.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
203,280.00
166,400.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
290,400.00
169,700.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
80,000.00
75,000.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
-----------------------------$------------------------------4------------
LotAcreag
4 1.63
-------------
2.50
e
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
LotAcrea
_L----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 4.67
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ .. _ _
17.00
e
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . . . .
LotAcreage
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
6.67
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - - _ _ _
10.00
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
3.95
10.50
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
4------------------------------
LotAcreage
�----------------------------- 4--------------------------
v 82.79
56.50
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblLandUse
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LotAcreage
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 0.80
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.50
----------tblLandUse----------=-----------Population
------------------
-------------------------------4--------------------------
485.00
-----------------------------_----------------------------
tblLandUse
Population
-j�-----------------------------
i 258.00
--------------------------
144.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
------------------------------
Haul in PercentPave
-----------------------------
v 50.00
--------------------------
100.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
_------------9-----------------�--------------------------------------------------------
Haul in PercentPave
i 50.00
100.00
-----------------------------Y------------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
Haul in PercentPave
--------------------------------------------------------
i 50.00
100.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblOnRoadDust
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - . _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ . .
Haul in PercentPave
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
4 50.00
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _
100.00
-----------------------------Y------------g----------------
tblOnRoadDust
Haul in PercentPave
-$--------------------------------------------------------
50.00
100.00
-----------------------------+------------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
VendorPercentPave
--------------------------------------------------------
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
Vend orPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
VendorPercentPave
4
T 50.00
100.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
_------------------------------
VendorPercentPave
g--------------------------------------------------------
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
Vend orPercentPave
4
50.00
100 00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
i 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblOnRoadDust
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. - _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _
WorkerPercentPave
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 50.00
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ - _
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
4
a 2014
2020
-----------------------------_-----------------------------
tblRoadDust
RoadPercentPave
------------------------------
4 50
-------------- -----------
100
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
4
i 449.00
186.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblTripsAndVMT
Y _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . - .. - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . - _
WorkerTripNumber
_L----- ------ ------ ------ ------ t
ii4 1,262.00
_ . _ - . _ . _ . - _ . _ _ . _ . - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
583.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblTripsAndVMT
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ .
WorkerTripNumber
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
4 252.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
117.00
-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
+------------------y-----------�------------------------------4--------------------------
NumberCatal tic
i 11.50
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblWoodstoves
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
NumberCatal tic
_r------ ------ ------ ------ ------ t
i 12.75
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _
0.00
-----------------------------
Y-----------------------------
4-------------------------------____._____-_____-.____--__
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
11.50
0.00
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
12.75
0.00
-----------------------------
4------------------------------
----------------------------- 4--------------------------
tblWoodstoves
; Wood stove DayYear
82.00 ;
0.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - ------------------------------ t
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblWoodstoves
Wood stove Da Year
Y
°v 82.00
0.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
+ 999.60
0.00
r
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2016 •i 0.6841 i 7.3181 5.5591 5.5300e- 4.8762 0.3886 i 5.2648 2.3118 i 0.3575 2.6693 0.0000 i 517.3785 517.3785 i 0.1521 0.0000 i 520.5719
003
2017 •i 0.8028 i 9.0611 i 6.2191 i 8.2700e- 2.7102 i 0.4314 i 3.1416 i 1.1206 0.3969 1.5175 0.0000 1 762.1621 i 762.1621 i 0.2292 i 0.0000 1 766.9750
003
2018 •i 0.6993 i 7.7822 5.6438 8.3000e- 2.7103 i 0.3640 i 3.0743 1.1206 i 0.3349 1.4555 0.0000 i 752.5058 i 752.5058 i 0.2300 i 0.0000 i 757.3351
003
2019 •i 4.4255 i 5.3624 i 7.7627 i 0.0136 i 3.2707 i 0.2458 i 3.5165 i 1.2709 0.2291 1.5000 0.0000 i 1,064.929 i 1,064.929 i 0.1458 i 0.0000 i 1,067.991
2 i 2 i i i 1
----------------- j------- j------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i-------i--------------- --- -- j-------j-------j-------1
2020 •i 9.5881 i 4.2420 8.6321 0.0166 i 0.8751 i 0.1897 i 1.0648 i 0.2345 i 0.1787 0.4131 0.0000 1 1,220.402 i 1,220.402 i 0.1096 1 0.0000 1 1,222.705
8 i 8 i i i 2
2021 •i 9.4949 i 3.7614 i 8.2802 i 0.0165 i 0.8717 i 0.1631 i 1.0348 i 0.2336 0.1536 0.3871 0.0000 1 1,207.239 i 1,207.239 i 0.1073 1 0.0000 i 1,209.491
3 i 3 i i i 6
---- ------------------------------------------------------i------- j--------------------- �-------�-------�-------
2022 •i 9.4156 i 3.3895 8.0125 i 0.0165 0.8684 0.1411 i 1.0095 0.2327 i 0.1329 0.3656 0.0000 i 1,194.380 1,194.380 i 0.1054 0.0000 1 1,196.594
3 i 3 i i i 4
2023 •i 9.1455 i 2.5979 i 6.3187 i 0.0133 i 0.6829 i 0.1066 i 0.7895 i 0.1829 i 0.1003 0.2832 0.0000 i 961.8212 i 961.8212 i 0.0932 1 0.0000 1 963.7792
Total
44.2559
43.5145
56.4282
0.0986
16.8656
2.0302
18.8958
6.7076
1.8837
8.5913
0.0000
7,680.819
7,680.819
1.1726
0.0000
7,705.443
1
1
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
2.1 Overall Construction
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2016 •i 0.1393 i 2.6469 3.3225 i 5.5300e- 1.8054 i 0.1287 i 1.9341 i 0.8565 i 0.1287 0.9851 0.0000 i 517.3779 i 517.3779 i 0.1521 0.0000 i 520.5713
003
2017 •i 0.2066 3.8855 i 5.0671 i 8.2700e- 1.0028 i 0.1722 i 1.1749 i 0.4151 i 0.1722 0.5873 0.0000 i 762.1612 i 762.1612 i 0.2292 i 0.0000 i 766.9741
003
----------•r-------------j---------------- j------- j---------------- j------ -�---------------+------r-------------j-------j-------*-------
2018 •i 0.2064 i 3.8993 5.0744 i 8.3000e- 1.0028 i 0.1728 i 1.1756 i 0.4151 i 0.1728 0.5880 0.0000 i 752.5049 i 752.5049 i 0.2300 0.0000 757.3342
003
2019 •1 4.1270 i 3.7504 i 7.7332 i 0.0136 i 1.1831 i 0.1622 i 1.3453 i 0.4721 i 0.1604 0.6326 0.0000 i 1,064.928 i 1,064.928 i 0.1458 i 0.0000 i 1,067.990
7 i 7 i i i 6
2020 •i 9.3756 i 3.5560 i 8.7642 i 0.0166 � 0.2803 i 0.1599 i 0.4402 i 0.0885 i 0.1576 0.2461 � 0.0000 i 1,220.402 i 1,220.402 i 0.1096 i 0.0000 i 1,222.704
4 i 4 i i i 8
-----------•------- j------- j------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i-------------- -+------r------�-------�-------�-------*----- -
2021 •i 9.3147 i 3.3260 i 8.4489 i 0.0165 0.2792 i 0.1562 i 0.4354 i 0.0881 i 0.1542 0.2423 0.0000 i 1,207.238 i 1,207.238 i 0.1073 i 0.0000 1,209.491
g i g 2
2022 •i 9.2631 i 3.2057 8.2084 i 0.0165 0.2781 i 0.1553 i 0.4334 i 0.0878 i 0.1533 0.2411 0.0000 i 1,194.379 i 1,194.379 i 0.1054 i 0.0000 i 1,196.594
g i g i i i 0
2023 •1 9.0314 2.6142 i 6.5348 i 0.0133 0.2183 i 0.1318 i 0.3500 i 0.0688 i 0.1303 0.1991 0.0000 i 961.8208 i 961.8208 i 0.0932 i 0.0000 i 963.7788
Total
41.6641
26.8840
53.1535
0.0986
6.0499
1.2392
7.2890
2.4920
1.2295
3.7215
0.0000
7,680.814
7,680.814
1.1726
0.0000
71705.438
7
7
9
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
5.86
38.22
5.80
0.00
64.13
38.96
61.43
62.85
34.73
56.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reduction
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 8.5350 i 0.0419 i 3.6225 i 1.9000e- 0.0571 i 0.0571 i i 0.0567 0.0567 0.0000 i 538.9368 i 538.9368 i 0.0160 9.7700e- i 542.3020
Energy •i 0.1849 1 1.6476 i 1.1668 i 0.0101 i i 0.1278 i 0.1278 i i 0.1278 0.1278 0.0000 i 5,088.590 i 5,088.590 i 0.1849 i 0.0645 5,112.479
Mobile •i 5.4527 i 12.9841 57.7953 i 0.1049 6.7817 i 0.2174 i 6.9991 i 1.8122 i 0.2002 2.0124 0.0000 i 7,378.670 i 7,378.670 i 0.2882 i 0.0000 i 7,384.721
'� i i i i i i i ■ 5 i 5 i i i 8
Waste •i i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 181.2953 i 0.0000 i 181.2953 i 10.7142 i 0.0000 i 406.2944
Water •1 i � i � i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.9146 i 1,022.585 1,041.499 i 1.9897 0.0556 i 1,100.518
'� i i i i i i i ■ 2 i 8 i i i 7
Total
14.1726
14.6735
62.5846
0.1152
6.7817
0.4022
7.1840
1.8122
0.3847
14,028.78
14,228.99
13.1930
0.1299
14,546.31
j
j
j
j
j
j
T-777.2099
26
24
j
66
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 5.0990 i 0.0419 3.6225 i 1.9000e- 0.0571 i 0.0571 i i 0.0567 0.0567 0.0000 i 538.9368 i 538.9368 i 0.0160 9.7700e- i 542.3020
Energy •i 0.1609 1.4330 i 1.0137 i 8.7700e- i i 0.1111 i 0.1111 i i 0.1111 0.1111 0.0000 i 4,197.001 i 4,197.001 i 0.1503 i 0.0540 i 4,216.884
003 i i i i ■ 0 i 0 i i i 2
Mobile •i 4.9627 i 9.0401 45.5480 i 0.0628 3.8956 i 0.1323 i 4.0279 i 1.0410 i 0.1219 1.1629 0.0000 i 4,407.667 i 4,407.667 i 0.1856 i 0.0000 i 4,411.566
Waste •1 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 45.3238 i 0.0000 i 45.3238 i 2.6786 i 0.0000 i 101.5736
Water •1 i � i � i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 � 15.1317 i 811.8997 � 827.0313 i 1.5915 � 0.0444 i 874.2224
Total
10.2225
10.5150
50.1842
0.0717
3.8956
0.3006
4.1962
1.0410
0.2898
1.3307
60.4555
9,955.505
10,015.96
4.6219
0.1082
10,146.54
4
09
82
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
27.87
28.34
19.81
37.75
42.56
25.28
41.59
42.56
24.68
39.43
69.80
29.04
29.61
64.97
16.75
30.25
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 ;Site Preparation
+Site Preparation
11/1/2016
i12/1/2016
5:
240
+
i
i
2 •Grading
+Grading
112/3/2016
i4/19/2019
5:
620
+ i
i
3 Building Construction
+Building Construction
14/19/2019
i10/1/2023
5:
1161
4 •Architectural Coating
- 1------------=------------=--------4----------------------------------
!Architectural Coating 18/1/2019 :12/22/2023
5:
1147
:------------------------
-----------------------+------------------------T-----------------------T--
----------
-- -------------------------
5 •Paving
:Paving
:10/23/2023
12/20/2023
5.
43,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1550
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 1,385,100; Residential Outdoor: 461,700; Non -Residential Indoor: 3,630,960; Non -Residential Outdoor: 1,210,320
(Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor
Site Preparation
+Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3; 8.00E
255'
0.40
---------------------------
Site Preparation
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 4; 8.00E
t--------------
97,
0.37
--------------------------
Grading
-------------
+Excavators ; 2; 8.00E
--------------
162'
0.38
---------------------------
Grading
--------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Graders ; 1; 8.00E
174'
0.41
----------------------------
Grading
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------t--------------
+Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 ; 8.00E
255'
0.40
----------------------------r--------------------------
Grading
-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Scrapers ; 2E 8.00E
361,
0.48
----------------------------
Grading
------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2E 8.00E
--------------
97'
0.37
----------------------------
Building Construction
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Cranes i 1; 7.00E
226'
0.29
----------------------------
Building Construction
r- --- - - - - - +------------+-------------t--------------
+Forklifts i 3; 8.00E
89'
0.20
----------------------------�--------------------------
Building Construction
-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Generator Sets ; 1 ; 8.00E
84'
0.74
----------------------------
Building Construction
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3; 7.00E
97'
0.37
----------------------------
Building Construction
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Welders ; 1; 8.00E
46'
0.45
----------------------------
Architectural Coating
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Air Compressors ; 1 ; 6.00E
78'
0.48
----------------------------
Paving
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Pavers i 2; 8.00E
125'
0.42
----------------------------
Paving
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Paving Equipment i 2; 8.00E
130'
0.36
------------------- ------ ---f
--------------------------+-----------------i-------------T-------------r
-------------
Paving
:Rollers 2- 8.00,
80,
0.38
Trips and VMT
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling
Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7:
18.00
0.001
0.00;
11.00:
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
IHHDT
----------------
Grading
8;
-------------------------------
20.00:
0.00: 0.00:
4
11.00:
----------------------------------
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
':---------------------
EHDT Mix
IHHDT
----------------�--------------�
Building Construction
9:
----- - i----------=---------
583.00-
186.00: 0.00:
---------------------------------------------':---
11.00:
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
----------------
:HDT_Mix
IHHDT
-------------
ArchitecturalCoating
1;
----------
117.00-
---------
0.00i 0.00i
----------4----------=------------
11.00:
5.40:
----- ----
20.00:LD_Mix
----------I
EHDT_Mix
---------
:HHDT
r----------}----------r---------+------------
'
- -
�_-------------------------------
-------------------+----------
-- ----
Paving
6;
15.00,
0.00,
0.00,
11.00,
5.40,
20.00TLD_Mix
HDT_Mix
rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust -1 2.1680 0.0000 i 2.1680 i 1.1917 0.0000 1.1917 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road -1 0.6093 i 6.5559 i 4.9326 4.6900e- i 0.3526 i 0.3526 i 0.3244 0.3244 0.0000 i 442.5253 i 442.5253 i 0.1335 i 0.0000 i 445.3284
003
Total
0.6093
6.5559
4.9326
4.6900e-
2.1680
0.3526
2.5206
1.1917
0.3244
1.5161
0.0000
442.5253
442.5253
0.1335
0.0000
445.3284
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 9.1800e- i 0.0129 0.1236 2.1000e- i 0.0179 i 1.2000e- i 0.0180 4.7400e- i 1.1000e- 4.8500e- + 0.0000 i 15.2458 15.2458 i 9.5000e- i 0.0000 15.2657
003 004 004 003 004 003 . 004 i
Total
9.1800e-
0.0129
0.1236
2.1000e-
0.0179
1.2000e-
0.0180
4.7400e-
1.1000e-
4.8500e-
0.0000
15.2458
15.2458
9.5000e-
0.0000
15.2657
003
004
004
003
004
003
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.8032 0.0000 0.8032 i 0.4415 0.0000 0.4415 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.1142 i 2.3350 i 2.8080 4.6900e- 0.1153 0.1153 0.1153 0.1153 0.0000 i 442.5248 i 442.5248 i 0.1335 i 0.0000 445.3279
003
Total
0.1142
2.3350
2.8080
4.6900e-
0.8032
0.1153
0.9186
0.4415
0.1153
0.5569
0.0000
442.5248
442.5248
0.1335
0.0000
445.3279
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 9.1800e- i 0.0129 0.1236 2.1000e- i 5.4600e- i 1.2000e- i 5.5800e- 1.7000e- i 1.1000e- 1.8100e- + 0.0000 i 15.2458 15.2458 i 9.5000e- i 0.0000 15.2657
003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 . 004 i
Total
9.1800e-
0.0129
0.1236
2.1000e-
5.4600e-
1.2000e-
5.5800e-
1.7000e-
1.1000e-
1.8100e-
0.0000
15.2458
15.2458
9.5000e-
0.0000
15.2657
003
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
004
3.3 Grading - 2016
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 2.6887 0.0000 2.6887 i 1.1149 0.0000 1.1149 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
-.-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------- --+ - ------'-------'------- '---------------
Off -Road •� 0.0648 i 0.7481 i 0.4914 � 6.2000e- i � 0.0358 � 0.0358 i � 0.0330 0.0330 � 0.0000 i 58.1957 i 58.1957 i 0.0176 i 0.0000 58.5644
004
Total
0.0648
0.7481
0.4914
6.2000e-
2.6887
0.0358
2.7246
1.1149
0.0330
1.1479
0.0000
58.1957
58.1957
0.0176
0.0000
58.5644
004
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.3 Grading - 2016
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 8.5000e- i 1.2000e- i 0.0115 2.000Oe- i 1.6500e- i 1.000Oe- i 1.6600e- 4.4000e- i 1.000Oe- 4.5000e- + 0.0000 i 1.4117 1.4117 i 9.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 1.4135
004 i 003 i 005 i 003 005 003 i 004 005 004 i 005
Total
8.5000e-
1.2000e-
0.0115
2.000Oe-
1.6500e-
1.000Oe-
1.6600e-
4.4000e-
1.0000e-
4.5000e.
0.0000
1.4117
1.4117
9.000-
0.0000
1.4135
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
0050e
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.9962 0.0000 0.9962 i 0.4131 0.0000 0.4131 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
-.i-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------- --+ - i-------'-------'-------'---------------
Off -Road •� 0.0151 i 0.2978 i 0.3794 � 6.2000e- i � 0.0132 � 0.0132 i � 0.0132 0.0132 � 0.0000 i 58.1957 i 58.1957 i 0.0176 i 0.0000 58.5643
004
Total
0.0151
0.2978
0.3794
6.2000e-
0.9962
0.0132
1.0094
0.4131
0.0132
0.4263
0.0000
58.1957
58.1957
0.0176
0.0000
58.5643
004
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.3 Grading - 2016
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 8.5000e- i 1.2000e- i 0.0115 2.000Oe- i 5.1000e- i 1.000Oe- i 5.2000e- 1.6000e- i 1.000Oe- 1.7000e- + 0.0000 i 1.4117 1.4117 i 9.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 1.4135
004 i 003 i 005 i 004 005 004 i 004 005 004 i 005
Total
8.5000e-
1.2000e-
0.0115
2.000Oe-
5.1000e-
1.000Oe-
5.2000e-
1.6000e-
1.0000e-
1.7000e.
0.0000
1.4117
1.4117
9.000-
0.0000
1.4135
004
003
005
004
005
004
004
005
004
0050e
3.3 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 2.6887 0.0000 2.6887 i 1.1149 0.0000 1.1149 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
-•-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'--------------- ------� '-------'-------'-------
Off-Road 0.7929 i 9.0470 i 6.0847 8.0200e- i 0.4312 0.4312 i 0.3967 0.3967 0.0000 i 744,5610 i 744.5610 i 0.2281 i 0.0000 749.3517
003
Total
0.7929
9.0470
6.0847
8.0200e-
2.6887
0.4312
3.1200
1.1149
0.3967
1.5117
0.0000
744.5610
744.5610
0.2281
0.0000
749.3517
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.3 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 9.9400e- i 0.0142 0.1345 2.5000e- i 0.0215 i 1.4000e- i 0.0216 5.7100e- i 1.3000e- 5.8300e- + 0.0000 i 17.6011 17.6011 i 1.0600e- i 0.0000 17.6233
003 004 004 003 004 003 . 003 i
Total
9.9400e-
0.0142
0.1345
2.5000e-
0.0215
1.4000e-
0.0216
5.7100e-
1.3000e-
5.8300e-
0.0000
17.6011
17.6011
1.0600e-
0.0000
17.6233
003
004
004
003
004
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.9962 0.0000 0.9962 i 0.4131 0.0000 0.4131 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
- ��-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-----------------------�------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •1 0.1967 i 3.8714 i 4.9326 � 8.0200e- i � 0.1720 � 0.1720 i � 0.1720 0.1720 � 0.0000 i 744.5601 i 744.5601 i 0.2281 i 0.0000 � 749.3509
'� 003
Total
0.1967
3.8714
4.9326
8.0200e-
0.9962
0.1720
1.1682
0.4131
0.1720
0.5851
0.0000
744.5601
744.5601
0.2281
0.0000
749.3509
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.3 Grading - 2017
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 9.9400e- i 0.0142 0.1345 2.5000e- i 6.5800e- i 1.4000e- i 6.7100e- 2.0400e- i 1.3000e- 2.1700e- + 0.0000 i 17.6011 17.6011 i 1.0600e- i 0.0000 17.6233
003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 . 003 i
Total
9.9400e-
0.0142
0.1345
2.5000e-
6.5800e-
1.4000e-
6.7100e-
2.0400e-
1.3000e-
2.1700e-
0.0000
17.6011
17.6011
1.0600e-
0.0000
17.6233
003
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
003
3.3 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 2.6887 0.0000 2.6887 i 1.1149 0.0000 1.1149 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •1 0.6903 i 7.7692 i 5.5210 8.0500e- i 0.3638 0.3638 i 0.3347 0.3347 0.0000 i 735.5190 i 735.5190 i 0.2290 i 0.0000 740.3275
003
Total
0.6903
7.7692
5.5210
8.0500e-
2.6887
0.3638
3.0526
1.1149
0.3347
1.4497
0.0000
735.5190
735.5190
0.2290
0.0000
740.3275
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.3 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 9.000Oe- i 0.0130 0.1228 2.5000e- i 0.0216 i 1.4000e- i 0.0217 5.7300e- i 1.3000e- 5.8500e- + 0.0000 i 16.9868 16.9868 i 9.9000e- i 0.0000 17.0075
003 004 004 003 004 003 . 004 i
Total
9.000Oe-
0.0130
0.1228
2.5000e-
0.0216
1.4000e-
0.0217
5.7300e-
1.3000e-
5.8500e-
0.0000
16.9868
16.9868
9.9000e-
0.0000
17.0075
003
004
004
003
004
003
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.9962 0.0000 0.9962 i 0.4131 0.0000 0.4131 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ i------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------+-------i-------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •1 0.1974 i 3.8863 i 4.9516 8.0500e- 0.1727 0.1727 0.1727 0.1727 0.0000 i 735.5182 i 735.5182 i 0.2290 i 0.0000 740.3267
003
Total
0.1974
3.8863
4.9516
8.0500e-
0.9962
0.1727
1.1689
0.4131
0.1727
0.5858
0.0000
735.5182
735.5182
0.2290
0.0000
740.3267
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.3 Grading - 2018
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 9.000Oe- i 0.0130 0.1228 2.5000e- i 6.6000e- i 1.4000e- i 6.7400e- 2.0500e- i 1.3000e- 2.1800e- + 0.0000 i 16.9868 16.9868 i 9.9000e- i 0.0000 17.0075
003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 . 004 i
Total
9.000Oe-
0.0130
0.1228
2.5000e-
6.6000e-
1.4000e-
6.7400e-
2.0500e-
1.3000e-
2.1800e-
0.0000
16.9868
16.9868
9.9000e-
0.0000
17.0075
003
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
004
3.3 Grading - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 2.6887 0.0000 2.6887 i 1.1149 0.0000 1.1149 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
- ��-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-----------------------�------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •� 0.1932 i 2.1408 i 1.5914 2.4400e- i 0.0989 0.0989 i 0.0910 0.0910 0.0000 i 218.9915 i 218.9915 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 220.4465
003
Total
0.1932
2.1408
1.5914
2.4400e-
2.6887
0.0989
2.7877
1.1149
0.0910
1.2060
0.0000
218.9915
218.9915
0.0693
0.0000
2:0.4465
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.3 Grading - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 2.5000e- i 3.6400e- i 0.0344 8.000Oe- i 6.5300e- i 4.000Oe- i 6.5700e- 1.7300e- i 4.000Oe- 1.7700e- + 0.0000 i 4.9486 4.9486 i 2.8000e- i 0.0000 i 4.9545
003 i 003 i 005 i 003 005 003 i 003 005 003 i 004
Total
2.5000e-
3.6400e-
0.0344
8.000Oe-
6.5300e-
4.000Oe-
6.5700e-
1.7300e-
4.000Oe-
1.7700e.
0.0000
4.9486
4.9486
2.8000e-
0.0000
4.9545
003
003
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.9962 0.0000 0.9962 i 0.4131 0.0000 0.4131 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
- ��-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-----------------------�------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •� 0.0598 i 1.1763 i 1.4988 2.4400e- i 0.0523 0.0523 i 0.0523 0.0523 0.0000 i 218.9913 i 218.9913 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 220.4463
003
Total
0.0598
1.1763
1.4988
2.4400e-
0.9962
0.0523
1.0485
0.4131
0.0523
0.4654
0.0000
218.9913
218.9913
0.0693
0.0000
2:0.4463
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.3 Grading - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 2.5000e- i 3.6400e- i 0.0344 8.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- i 2.0400e- 6.2000e- i 4.000Oe- 6.6000e- + 0.0000 i 4.9486 4.9486 i 2.8000e- i 0.0000 i 4.9545
003 i 003 i 005 i 003 005 003 i 004 005 004 i 004
Total
2.5000e-
3.6400e-
0.0344
8.000Oe-
2.000Oe-
4.000Oe-
2.0400e-
6.2000e-
4.000Oe-
6.6000e.
0.0000
4.9486
4.9486
2.8000e-
0.0000
4.9545
003
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
004
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.2152 i 1.9183 i 1.5665 2.4500e- 0.1176 i 0.1176 0.1106 0.1106 0.0000 i 214.2223 i 214.2223 i 0.0521 i 0.0000 i 215.3169
003
Total
0.2152
1.9183
1.5665
2.4500e-
0.1176
0.1176
0.1106
0.1106
0.0000
214.2223
214.2223
0.0521
0.0000
215.3169
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
I I 1 I I I I I I I I
Hauling •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 � 0.0000 + 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000
I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I
,I I
-----------•r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
+-------I-------'-------'-------'-------+-------
I I I I I I I I I I I
Vendor •I 0.1286 I 0.9242 I 1.8704 12.7700e- I 0.0818 I 0.0191 I 0.1008 I 0.0232 I 0.0176 0.0408 � 0.0000 I 238.7599 1238.7599 11.5600e- I 0.0000 � 238.7926
003 I 1 1 I 1 . I I I 003 I I
, I 1 I
I I 1 I I I I I I I I
Worker •I 0.1690 I 0.2460 I 2.3221 15.0900e- I 0.4410 12.7900e- I 0.4438 I 0.1171 12.5900e- � 0.1197 + 0.0000 I 334.1494 1334.1494 I 0.0191 I 0.0000 i 334.5504
003 I I 003 1 I 1 003
Total
0.2976
1.1702
4.1925
7.8600e-
0.5228
0.0219
0.5446
0.1403
0.0202
572.9092
0.0207
0.0000
573.3430
003
[777000
11572.9092
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I
Off -Road •I 0.0614 I 1.2969 I 1.6301 12.4500e- I I 0.0825 I 0.0825 I I 0.0825 0.0825 0.0000 I 214.2221 1214.2221 I 0.0521 I 0.0000 i 215.3166
003 I I I I I I I I I
Total
0.0614
1.2969
1.6301
2.4500e-
0.0825
0.0825
0.0825
0.0825
0.0000
214.2221
214.2221
0.0521
0.0000
215.3166
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
+-------r------'-------'-------'-------+-------
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.1286 i 0.9242 � 1.8704 i 2.7700e- i 0.0338 � 0.0191 i 0.0529 � 0.0114 i 0.0176 0.0290 � 0.0000 i 238.7599 � 238.7599 i 1.5600e- i 0.0000 � 238.7926
003 003
Worker •i 0.1690 i 0.2460 2.3221 5.0900e- i 0.1349 i 2.7900e- i 0.1377 0.0420 i 2.5900e- 0.0445 + 0.0000 i 334.1494 334.1494 i 0.0191 i 0.0000 i 334.5504
003 003 003
Total
0.2976
1.1702
4.1925
7.8600e-
0.1687
0.0219
0.1906
0.0534
0.0202
572.9092
0.0207
0.0000
573.3430
003
[777000
11572.9092
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.2766 i 2.5000 i 2.2019 3.5100e- 0.1458 0.1458 0.1371 0.1371 0.0000 i 302.1514 i 302.1514 0.0736 i 0.0000 303.6973
003
Total
0.2766
2.5000
2.2019
3.5100e-
0.1458
0.1458
0.1371
0.1371
0.0000
302.1514
302.1514
0.0736
0.0000
303.6973
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------- ----+-------r------'------- '-------'------- +-------
Vendor •i 0.1578 i 1.1253 � 2.4581 i 3.9500e- i 0.1170 � 0.0246 i 0.1416 � 0.0332 i 0.0226 0.0558 � 0.0000 i 333.7153 � 333.7153 i 2.1500e- i 0.0000 333.7604
003 003
Worker •i 0.2256 i 0.3299 3.1084 7.2900e- i 0.6314 i 4.0100e- i 0.6354 0.1676 i 3.7100e- 0.1713 + 0.0000 i 458.9780 458.9780 i 0.0261 i 0.0000 459.5252
003 003 003
Total
0.3834
1.4552
5.5665
0.0112
0.7484
0.0286
0.7769
0.2008
0.0263
0.2271
0.0000
792.6933
1 792.6933
j 0.0282
0.0000
793.2856
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.0879 i 1.8568 i 2.3338 3.5100e- 0.1181 i 0.1181 0.1181 0.1181 0.0000 i 302.1510 i 302.1510 0.0736 i 0.0000 303.6969
003
Total
0.0879
1.8568
2.3338
3.5100e-
0.1181
0.1181
0.1181
0.1181
0.0000
302.1510
302.1510
0.0736
0.0000
303.6969
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------- ----+-------r------'------- '-------'------- +-------
Vendor •i 0.1578 i 1.1253 � 2.4581 i 3.9500e- i 0.0484 � 0.0246 i 0.0729 � 0.0164 i 0.0226 0.0390 � 0.0000 i 333.7153 � 333.7153 i 2.1500e- i 0.0000 333.7604
003 003
Worker •i 0.2256 i 0.3299 3.1084 7.2900e- i 0.1932 i 4.0100e- i 0.1972 0.0601 i 3.7100e- 0.0638 0.0000 i 458.9780 458.9780 i 0.0261 i 0.0000 459.5252
003 003 003
Total
0.3834
1.4552
5.5665
0.0112
0.2415
0.0286
0.2701
0.0764
0.0263
0.1027
0.0000
792.6933
792.6933
0.0282
0.0000
793.2856
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.2471 i 2.2629 i 2.1582 3.5000e- 0.1246 0.1246 0.1172 0.1172 0.0000 i 301.0339 i 301.0339 0.0725 i 0.0000 302.5568
003
Total
0.2471
2.2629
2.1582
3.5000e-
0.1246
0.1246
0.1172
0.1172
0.0000
301.0339
301.0339
0.0725
0.0000
302.5568
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
+-------r------'-------'-------'-------+-------
Vendor •i 0.1463 i 0.9248 � 2.3435 i 3.9300e- i 0.1165 � 0.0213 i 0.1378 � 0.0331 i 0.0196 0.0527 � 0.0000 i 331.9812 � 331.9812 i 2.1600e- i 0.0000 � 332.0265
003 003
Worker •i 0.2130 i 0.3118 2.9494 7.2700e- i 0.6290 i 4.0400e- i 0.6330 0.1670 i 3.7500e- 0.1707 + 0.0000 i 450.4960 450.4960 i 0.0252 i 0.0000 451.0257
003 003 003
Total
0.3592
1.2366
5.2930
0.0112
0.7455
0.0253
0.7708
0.2001
0.0234
[777000
1 782.4772
11782.4772
j 0.0274
0.0000
783.0522
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.0876 i 1.8497 i 2.3249 3.5000e- 0.1177 i 0.1177 0.1177 0.1177 0.0000 i 301.0335 i 301.0335 0.0725 i 0.0000 302.5565
003
Total
0.0876
1.8497
2.3249
3.5000e-
0.1177
0.1177
0.1177
0.1177
0.0000
301.0335
301.0335
0.0725
0.0000
302.5565
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 28 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
+-------r------'-------'------ -'------- +-------
Vendor •i 0.1463 i 0.9248 � 2.3435 i 3.9300e- i 0.0482 � 0.0213 i 0.0695 � 0.0163 i 0.0196 0.0359 � 0.0000 i 331.9812 � 331.9812 i 2.1600e- i 0.0000 1 332.0265
003 003
Worker •i 0.2130 i 0.3118 2.9494 7.2700e- i 0.1925 i 4.0400e- i 0.1965 0.0598 i 3.7500e- 0.0636 + 0.0000 i 450.4960 450.4960 i 0.0252 i 0.0000 451.0257
003 003 003
Total
0.3592
1.2366
5.2930
0.0112
0.2406
0.0253
0.2659
0.0761
0.0234
0.0995
0.0000
782.4772
782.4772
0.0274
0.0000
783.0522
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.2209 i 2.0197 i 2.1226 3.4900e- 0.1047 0.1047 0.0986 0.0986 0.0000 i 299.9946 i 299.9946 i 0.0718 i 0.0000 301.5017
003
Total
0.2209
2.0197
2.1226
3.4900e-
0.1047
0.1047
0.0986
0.0986
0.0000
299.9946
299.9946
0.0718
0.0000
301.5017
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 29 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
+--------------'------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.1414 i 0.8287 � 2.2931 i 3.9000e- i 0.1161 � 0.0209 i 0.1369 � 0.0329 i 0.0192 � 0.0521 � 0.0000 i 330.2883 � 330.2883 i 2.1900e- i 0.0000 330.3342
003 003
Worker •i 0.2024 i 0.2981 2.7992 7.2400e- i 0.6266 i 4.0400e- i 0.6306 0.1663 i 3.7500e- 0.1701 + 0.0000 i 442.1681 442.1681 i 0.0244 i 0.0000 442.6809
003 003 003
Total
0.3439
1.1268
5.0924
0.0111
0.7426
0.0249
0.7675
0.1993
0.0230
0.2222
0.0000
772.4564
772.4564
0.0266
0.0000
773.0151
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.0873 i 1.8426 i 2.3160 3.4900e- 0.1172 i 0.1172 0.1172 0.1172 0.0000 i 299.9943 i 299.9943 i 0.0718 i 0.0000 301.5013
003
Total
0.0873
1.8426
2.3160
3.4900e-
0.1172
0.1172
0.1172
0.1172
0.0000
299.9943
299.9943
0.0718
0.0000
301.5013
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 30 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
+--------------'------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.1414 i 0.8287 � 2.2931 i 3.9000e- i 0.0479 � 0.0209 i 0.0688 � 0.0162 i 0.0192 � 0.0354 � 0.0000 i 330.2883 � 330.2883 i 2.1900e- i 0.0000 330.3342
003 003
Worker •i 0.2024 i 0.2981 2.7992 7.2400e- i 0.1917 i 4.0400e- i 0.1958 0.0596 i 3.7500e- 0.0634 + 0.0000 i 442.1681 442.1681 i 0.0244 i 0.0000 442.6809
003 003 003
Total
0.3439
1.1268
5.0924
0.0111
0.2397
0.0249
0.2646
0.0758
0.0230
0.0988
0.0000
772.4564
772.4564
0.0266
0.0000
773.0151
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.1527 i 1.3955 i 1.5804 2.6200e- 0.0679 i 0.0679 0.0639 0.0639 0.0000 i 225.0735 i 225.0735 0.0535 i 0.0000 i 226.1962
003
Total
0.1527
1.3955
1.5804
2.6200e-
0.0679
0.0679
0.0639
0.0639
0.0000
225.0735
225.0735
0.0535
0.0000
226.1962
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 31 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------+-------r------'------- '------- '------- +--- ----
Vendor •i 0.0991 i 0.5477 1.6552 i 2.9200e- i 0.0870 0.0150 i 0.1020 0.0247 i 0.0138 0.0385 0.0000 i 247.0942 247.0942 i 1.5400e- i 0.0000 247.1266
003 003
Worker •i 0.1454 i 0.2158 2.0070 5.4300e- i 0.4699 i 3.0400e- i 0.4730 0.1248 i 2.8200e- 0.1276 + 0.0000 i 327.2257 327.2257 i 0.0179 i 0.0000 i 327.6009
003 003 003
Total
0.2445
0.7634
3.6622
8.3500e-
0.5569
0.0181
0.5750
0.1495
0.0166
0.1661
0.0000
574.3198
574.3198
0.0194
0.0000
574.7274
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.0654 i 1.3820 i 1.7370 2.6200e- 0.0879 i 0.0879 0.0879 0.0879 0.0000 i 225.0732 i 225.0732 0.0535 i 0.0000 i 226.1959
003
Total
0.0654
1.3820
1.7370
2.6200e-
0.0879
0.0879
0.0879
0.0879
0.0000
225.0732
225.0732
0.0535
0.0000
226.1959
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 32 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '--------------------- --r------'------- '------- '------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0991 i 0.5477 � 1.6552 i 2.9200e- i 0.0359 � 0.0150 i 0.0510 � 0.0122 i 0.0138 0.0260 � 0.0000 i 247.0942 � 247.0942 i 1.5400e- i 0.0000 247.1266
003 003
Worker •i 0.1454 i 0.2158 2.0070 5.4300e- i 0.1438 i 3.0400e- i 0.1468 0.0447 i 2.8200e- 0.0475 + 0.0000 i 327.2257 327.2257 i 0.0179 i 0.0000 i 327.6009
003 003 003
Total
0.2445
0.7634
3.6622
8.3500e-
0.1797
0.0181
0.1978
0.0569
0.0166
0.0735
0.0000
574.3198
574.3198
0.0194
0.0000
574.7274
003
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 3.6823 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
-----------•i-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'--------------- ------� ------'-------'-------'-------
Off-Road •1 0.0145 i 0.1000 i 0.1004 1.6000e- i 7.0200e- 7.0200e- i 7.0200e- 7.0200e- 0.0000 i 13.9152 i 13.9152 i 1.1800e- i 0.0000 13.9399
004 003 003 003 003 003 i
Total
3.6969
0.1000
0.1004
1.6000e-
7.0200e-
7.0200e-
7.0200e-
7.0200e-
0.0000
13.9152
13.9152
1.1800e-
0.0000
13.9399
11
004
003
003
003
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 33 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0202 i 0.0294 i 0.2776 6.1000e- i 0.0527 i 3.3000e- i 0.0531 0.0140 i 3.1000e- 0.0143 + 0.0000 i 39.9423 39.9423 i 2.2800e- i 0.0000 i 39.9903
004 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0202
0.0294
0.2776
6.1000e-
0.0527
3.3000e-
0.0531
0.0140
3.1000e-
0.0143
0.0000
39.9423
39.9423
2.2800e-
0.0000
39.9903
004
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 3.6823 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •!------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '--------------- ------� ------'-------'-------'-------
Off-Road •i 3.2400e- i 0.0740 i 0.0999 1.6000e- i 5.1800e- 5.1800e- i 5.1800e- 5.1800e- 0.0000 i 13.9152 i 13.9152 i 1.1800e- i 0.0000 13.9399
003 004 003 003 003 003 003 i
Total
3.6856
0.0740
0.0999
1.6000e-
5.1800e-
5.1800e-
5.1800e-
5.1800e-
0.0000
13.9152
13.9152
1.1800e-
0.0000
13.9399
004
003
003
003
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 34 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0202 i 0.0294 i 0.2776 6.1000e- i 0.0161 i 3.3000e- i 0.0165 5.0100e- i 3.1000e- 5.3200e- + 0.0000 i 39.9423 39.9423 i 2.2800e- i 0.0000 i 39.9903
004 004 003 004 003 . 003 i
Total
0.0202
0.0294
0.2776
6.1000e-
0.0161
3.3000e-
0.0165
5.0100e-
3.1000e-
5.3200e-
0.0000
39.9423
39.9423
2.2800e-
0.0000
39.9903
004
004
003
004
003
003
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 8.8511 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ i------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------+-------i-------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •1 0.0317 i 0.2206 i 0.2399 3.9000e- 0.0145 0.0145 0.0145 0.0145 0.0000 i 33.4476 i 33.4476 2.5900e- i 0.0000 33.5020
004 i i i i i i i003
Total
8.8829
0.2206
0.2399
3.9000e-
0.0145
0.0145
0.0145
0.0145
0.0000
33.4476
33.4476
2.5900e-
0.0000
33.5020
11
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 35 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0453 i 0.0662 0.6238 1.4600e- i 0.1267 i 8.000Oe- i 0.1275 0.0336 i 7.5000e- 0.0344 + 0.0000 i 92.1105 92.1105 i 5.2300e- i 0.0000 i 92.2203
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0453
0.0662
0.6238
1.4600e-
0.1267
8.000Oe-
0.1275
0.0336
7.5000e-
0.0344
0.0000
92.1105
92.1105
5.2300e-
0.0000
92.2203
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 8.8511 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ i------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------+-------i-------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •i 7.7900e- 0.1778 0.2401 3.9000e- 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0000 i 33.4476 33.4476 2.5900e- 0.0000 33.5020
i i i i
•� 003 004 i003
Total
8.8589
0.1778
0.2401
3.9000e-
0.0125
0.0125
0.0125
0.0125
0.0000
33.4476
33.4476
2.5900e-
0.0000
33.5020
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 36 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0453 i 0.0662 0.6238 1.4600e- i 0.0388 i 8.000Oe- i 0.0396 0.0121 i 7.5000e- 0.0128 + 0.0000 i 92.1105 92.1105 i 5.2300e- i 0.0000 i 92.2203
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0453
0.0662
0.6238
1.4600e-
0.0388
8.000Oe-
0.0396
0.0121
7.5000e-
0.0128
0.0000
92.1105
92.1105
5.2300e-
0.0000
92.2203
003
004
004
003
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 8.8174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ i------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------+-------i-------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •1 0.0286 i 0.1993 i 0.2372 3.9000e- 0.0123 0.0123 0.0123 0.0123 0.0000 i 33.3200 i 33.3200 i 2.2900e- i 0.0000 33.3680
004 i i i i i i i003
Total
8.8459
0.1993
0.2372
3.9000e-
0.0123
0.0123
0.0123
0.0123
0.0000
33.3200
33.3200
2.2900e-
0.0000
33.3680
11
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 37 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0626 0.5919 1.4600e- i 0.1262 i 8.1000e- i 0.1270 0.0335 i 7.5000e- 0.0343 + 0.0000 i 90.4083 90.4083 i 5.0600e- i 0.0000 90.5146
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0427
0.0626
0.5919
1.4600e-
0.1262
8.1000e-
0.1270
0.0335
7.5000e-
0.0343
0.0000
90.4083
90.4083
5.0600e-
0.0000
90.5146
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 8.8174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ i------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------+-------i-------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •i 7.7600e- i 0.1771 i 0.2391 3.9000e- 0.0124 0.0124 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 i 33.3199 i 33.3199 i 2.2900e- i 0.0000 33.3679
•� 003 004 i003
Total
8.8251
0.1771
0.2391
3.9000e-
0.0124
0.0124
0.0124
0.0124
0.0000
33.3199
33.3199
2.2900e-
0.0000
33.3679
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 38 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0626 0.5919 1.4600e- i 0.0386 i 8.1000e- i 0.0394 0.0120 i 7.5000e- 0.0128 + 0.0000 i 90.4083 90.4083 i 5.0600e- i 0.0000 90.5146
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0427
0.0626
0.5919
1.4600e-
0.0386
8.1000e-
0.0394
0.0120
7.5000e-
0.0128
0.0000
90.4083
90.4083
5.0600e-
0.0000
90.5146
003
004
004
003
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 8.7836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
�i-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------i-------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •� 0.0266 i 0.1831 i 0.2358 � 3.9000e- i � 0.0106 � 0.0106 i � 0.0106 0.0106 � 0.0000 i 33.1923 i 33.1923 i 2.1600e- i 0.0000 33.2377
004 i i i i i i i003
Total
8.8102
0.1831
0.2358
3.9000e-
0.0106
0.0106
0.0106
0.0106
0.0000
33.1923
33.1923
2.1600e-
0.0000
33.2377
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 39 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0406 i 0.0598 0.5618 1.4500e- i 0.1257 i 8.1000e- i 0.1266 0.0334 i 7.5000e- 0.0341 + 0.0000 i 88.7370 88.7370 i 4.9000e- i 0.0000 i 88.8399
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0406
0.0598
0.5618
1.4500e-
0.1257
8.1000e-
0.1266
0.0334
7.5000e-
0.0341
0.0000
88.7370
88.7370
4.9000e-
0.0000
88.8399
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 8.7836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ i------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------+-------i-------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •i 7.7300e- i 0.1764 i 0.2382 3.9000e- 0.0124 0.0124 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 i 33.1923 i 33.1923 i 2.1600e- i 0.0000 33.2376
•� 003 004 i003
Total
8.7913
0.1764
0.2382
3.9000e-
0.0124
0.0124
0.0124
0.0124
0.0000
33.1923
33.1923
2.1600e-
0.0000
33.2376
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 40 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0406 i 0.0598 0.5618 1.4500e- i 0.0385 i 8.1000e- i 0.0393 i 0.0120 i 7.5000e- 0.0127 0.0000 i 88.7370 88.7370 i 4.9000e- i 0.0000 i 88.8399
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0406
0.0598
0.5618
1.4500e-
0.0385
8.1000e-
0.0393
0.0120
7.5000e-
0.0127
0.0000
88.7370
88.7370
4.9000e-
0.0000
88.8399
003
004
004
003
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 8.6147 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •1 0.0244 i 0.1661 i 0.2309 3.8000e- i 9.0300e- 9.0300e- i 9.0300e- 9.0300e- 0.0000 i 32,5540 i 32.5540 1.9500e- i 0.0000 32.5949
•� 004 003 003 003 003 003 i
Total
8.6391
0.1661
0.2309
3.8000e-
9.0300e-
9.0300e-
9.0300e-
9.0300e-
0.0000
32.5540
32.5540
1.9500e-
0.0000
32.5949
11
004
003
003
003
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 41 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0382 i 0.0566 0.5267 1.4300e- i 0.1233 i 8.000Oe- i 0.1241 0.0327 i 7.4000e- 0.0335 + 0.0000 i 85.8757 85.8757 i 4.6900e- i 0.0000 i 85.9742
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0382
0.0566
0.5267
1.4300e-
0.1233
8.000Oe-
0.1241
0.0327
7.4000e-
85.8757
85.8757
4.6900e-
0.0000
85.9742
003
004
004
[777000
11
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 8.6147 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ i------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------+-------i-------'-------'-------'-------+
Off -Road •i 7.5800e- i 0.1730 i 0.2336 3.8000e- 0.0121 0.0121 0.0121 0.0121 0.0000 i 32.5540 i 32.5540 1.9500e- i 0.0000 32.5949
003 i i i 004 i i i i i i i i 003
Total
8.6222
0.1730
0.2336
3.8000e-
0.0121
0.0121
0.0121
0.0121
0.0000
32.5540
32.5540
1.9500e-
0.0000
32.5949
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 42 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0382 i 0.0566 0.5267 1.4300e- i 0.0377 i 8.000Oe- i 0.0385 0.0117 i 7.4000e- 0.0125 + 0.0000 i 85.8757 85.8757 i 4.6900e- i 0.0000 i 85.9742
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0382
0.0566
0.5267
1.4300e-
0.0377
8.000Oe-
0.0385
0.0117
7.4000e-
0.0125
0.0000
85.8757
85.8757
4.6900e-
0.0000
85.9742
003
004
004
003
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.0218 i 0.2150 i 0.3071 4.8000e- 0.0108 0.0108 9.9100e- 9.9100e- 0.0000 i 42.1416 i 42.1416 i 0.0136 i 0.0000 42.4279
•� 004 003 003
Paving •1 0.0485 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
0.0703
0.2150
0.3071
4.8000e-
0.0108
0.0108
9.9100e-
9.9100e-
0.0000
42.1416
42.1416
0.0136
0.0000
42.4279
11
004
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 43 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- -------- '------- '-------'------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 8.2000e- i 1.2200e- i 0.0114 3.000Oe- i 2.6700e- i 2.000Oe- i 2.6800e- 7.1000e- i 2.000Oe- 7.2000e- + 0.0000 i 1.8565 1.8565 i 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 1.8587
004 i 003 i 005 i 003 005 003 i 004 005 004 i 004
Total
8.2000e-
1.2200e-
0.0114
3.000Oe-
2.6700e-
2.000Oe-
2.6800e-
7.1000e-
2.000Oe-
7.2000e.
0.0000
1.8565
1.8565
1.0007e-
0.0000
1.8587
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.0118 i 0.2379 i 0.3639 4.8000e- 0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0000 i 42.1416 i 42.1416 i 0.0136 i 0.0000 42.4278
004
Paving •� 0.0485 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
0.0603
0.2379
0.3639
4.8000e-
0.0129
0.0129
0.0129
0.0129
0.0000
42.1416
42.1416
0.0136
0.0000
42.4278
004
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 44 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
3.6 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
1-
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 8.2000e- i 1.2200e- i 0.0114 3.00OOe- i 8.2000e- i 2.00OOe- i 8.3000e- 2.5000e- i 2.00OOe- 2.7000e- + 0.0000 i 1.8565 1.8565 i 1.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 1.8587
004 i 003 i 005 i 004 005 004 i 004 005 004 i 004
Total
8.2000e-
1.2200e-
0.0114
3.00OOe-
8.2000e-
2.00OOe.
8.3000e-
2.5000e.
2.00OOe-
2.7000e.
0.0000
1.8565
1.8565
1.00OOe-
0.0000
1.8587
004
003
005
004
005
004
004
005
004
004
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Density
Increase Diversity
Improve Walkability Design
Improve Destination Accessibility
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 45 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
ROG
NOx I
CO
I S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated •, 4.9627 i 9.0401 i 45.5480 0.0628 i 3.8956 i 0.1323
4.0279
i 1.0410
i 0.1219
1.1629
0.0000 , 4,407.667 4,407.667 0.1856
i 0.0000 i 4,411.566
9 , 9 ,
, i 0
Unmitigated
5.4527 12.9841 57.7953 0.1049 6.7817 0.2174
6.9991
1.8122
0.2002
2.0124
0.0000 7,378.670 • 7,378.670 • 0.2882
- 0.0000 7,384.721
5 5
8
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise ; 988.50 1,074.00 910.50 2,213,593 1,271,545
. . .. . . .. . . . . .A - - - - - - - -f - - - - - - - - - - -
• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. - - - - - - - - - __________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Apartments Mid Rise 527.20 , 572.80 485.60 1.180.583 678,157
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
City Park + 55.65 ; 55.65 55.65 106,102 60,948
......................................-----------------------T-------------------------------- --------------------------
Strip Mall + 1,551.20 ; 1,471.40 715.05 1,658,658 952,776
.................................................. ---------- ---------- ---------------------- -----------------------
General Office Building + 110.10 ; 23.70 9.80 178,048 102,275
................................................... ---------- - ----------- ---------------------- -----------------------
T Y
General Office Building ; 781.71 168.27 69.58 1,264,143 726,156
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .----------T . . .. - - - - - - - Y ---------------------------------------------------
General Office Building ; 55.05 11.85 4.90 89,024 51,138
A------------
..................................... ---------- ----------- ----------------------------------------------------
Golf Coup se , 782.79 790.86 1.144.481 657,419
:
.............. _ _ _-677.88
............... --------------T --Y - -
Golf Course ; 75.60 ; 87.30 88.20 127,637 73,318
......................................-----------
;-----------T-----------Y---------------------------------------------------
Hotel + 1,143.80 , 1,146.60 833.00 1,633,249 938,180
.................................................. ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r
Hotel ; 1,634.00 ; 1,638.00 1190.00 2,333,213 1,340,257
. .
.................................................. ---------- ---------- ---------------------- -----------------------
T y
Other Asphalt Surfaces + 0.00 0.00 0.00
.................................................. -----------------------------------------------.-------------------------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 0.00 0.00
...................... ...... ...... ....________-__ __----------- ------------------------ --------------------------
Quality Restaurant ; 449.75 471.80 360.80 376,413 216,221
�_
.................................................. ------------------------------------------- -------------------------
Single Family Housing + 2,440.35 ; 2,570.40 2236.35 5,435,239 3,122,141
Total 10,490.79
10,074.56
7,750.29
17,740,383
10,190,532
4.3 Trip Type Information
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 46 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
1
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
7-Miles
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H O or C-NW
H-W or C-W H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
=ed
Pass -by
Apartments Mid Rise ; 11.00
3.50
4.50
40.20
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
........................--------------------
.......... r - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
-- - - ------ - -
Apartments Mid Rise 11.00
3.50
4.50 v
40.20
;-
19.20
, 40.60
86
11
3
....................... .----------- ----------
City Park ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
-----------------
33.00
1 48.00
I ----------------------------------------------------
19.00
66
28
6
.......................---------------------
------
Strip Mall 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
16.60
1 64.40
19.00
45
40
15
......... ...............-------------------
General Office Building ; 12.50 4.20
r--------�
5.40
33.00
I 48.00
---�
19.00
---------
77
---------- -----------------
19
4
...............---12.5-------------
General Office Building 12.50
4.20
5.40
33.00
48.00
1900.
77
19
4
......... ...............-------------------
General Office Building ; 12.50 4.20 T
---;r-
5.40
-------�
33.00
--------�
48.00
----------------------
T 19.00
77
---------- -----------------
19
4
Golf Course 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
33.00
48.00
19.00
52
39
9
........................-------------------- T
Golf Course 12.50 4.20
....... :
----------�
5.40
33.00
........
48.00
T ...........: ..
19.00
--------
52
-------- -----------------
39
9
........................--------------------
-r--------�
--------------
Hotel 12.50
4.20
5.40 r
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
....................... .----------- ----------
Hotel ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
--------
19.40
1 61.60
19.00
58
------ -----------------
38
4
........................--------------------
--- ---------
-----------------
Other Asphalt Surfaces 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
........................----------- ----------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
-------
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
-----------------
0
0
........................--------------------
_
T
--------------
Quality Restaurant 12.50
4.20
5.40 i
12.00
69.00
19.00
38
18
44
....................... r----------rt---------T----------,F
Single Family Housing 11.00 3.50
4.50
------------------ r--------t-----------
40.20 19.20 40.60
---------
86
-------- -----------------
11
3
LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
0.471073• 0.065210, 0.167869, 0.157103, 0.039378, 0.006346, 0.011728, 0.072116, 0.001386, 0.001196, 0.003702, 0.000530, 0.002362
§.g FenffggPetaiI
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 47 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
0.0000
0.0000
i
i 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
i 2,605.105 2,605.105 0.1198
i 0.0248
i 2,615.301
Mitigated
8 8
i 0
------------ •------- '------- '-------- ------------------------------------------------------
----+-----
r------'-------'-------'-------+-------
Electricity •i
i � i
i
i 0.0000
i 0.0000
i
i 0.0000
0.0000
� 0.0000
i 3,258.613 � 3,258.613 i 0.1498
i 0.0310
� 3,271.366
Unmitigated
4 4
i 1
NaturalGas •i
0.1609 i 1.4330 1.0137 8.7700e-
i
i 0.1111
0.1111
i
i 0.1111
0.1111
0.0000
i 1,591.895 i 11591.895 0.0305
i 0.0292
i 1,601.583
Mitigated
003
■
i 2 2
i 2
NaturalGas
0.1849 1.6476 1.1668 0.0101
0.1278
0.1278
0.1278
0.1278
0.0000
1,829.976 - 1,829.976 - 0.0351
- 0.0336
1,841.113
Unmitigated
6 6
6
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 48 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 959500 �i 5.1700e- i 0.0442 i 0.0188 i 2.8000e- 3.5700e- i 3.5700e- i i 3.5700e- 3.5700e- 0.0000 i 51.2026 i 51.2026 i 9.8000e- 9.4000e- 51.5142
Rise 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 004 004 i
--------- ------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------�-------+---- '-------'-------'------- --ter +-------
�-
City Park 0 i i i i i i i i i i i
0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
.i
General Office 18250 :i 1.000Oe- 8.9000e- i 7.5000e- i 1.000Oe- i 7.000Oe- i 7.000Oe- i 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0000 1 0.9739 i 0.9739 i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.9798
Building 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 1 005 i 005
i � � i � i i � .
-------------------r------�''-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------r------i � '-------'------- '------- tei -------i i i i i i i i i '*-------
General Office 259150 -1 1.4000e- i 0.0127 i 0.0107 i 8.000Oe- i 9.7000e- i 9.7000e- 9.7000e- 9.7000e- 0.0000 1 13.8292 13.8292 i 2.7000e- i 2.5000e- 13.9134
Building i .� 003 005 004 004 004 004 . i 004 004 i
General Office i 36500 -i 2.000Oe- i 1.7900e- 1.5000e- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.4000e- i 1.4000e- i 1.4000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1 1.9478 i 1.9478 i 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 1.9596
Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 i 005
i � � i � i i �
---------- •'------'----------------------------------------------------------------+-------' '--------------'------- --'''''''
ter i i i i i i i i �- i i 'i +-------
I
Golf Course 0 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
.i
-------- ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i +-------
Hotel 1.04666e -1 0.0564 i 0.5131 i 0.4310 i 3.0800e- i 0.0390 i 0.0390 i 0.0390 0.0390 0.0000 1 558.5355 i 558.5355 i 0.0107 0.0102 i 561.9347
i +007 003
-- ------- ter i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
Hotel i 1.06741e -1 0.0576 i 0.5232 0.4395 i 3.1400e- i 0.0398 i 0.0398 0.0398 0.0398 0.0000 i 569.6122 569.6122 i 0.0109 i 0.0104 573.0788
+007 003
Other Asphalt 0 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
.1
Surfaces
-------- •''-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------' '-------'-------'-------
Quality 1.38755e -i 7.4800e- i 0.0680 i 0.0571 i 4.1000e- i 5.1700e- i 5.1700e- i 5.1700e- 5.1700e- + 0.0000 i 74.0450 74.0450 i 1.4200e- 1.3600e- 74.4956
Restaurant i +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 003 i
-------- ter i i i i i i i i r------i i i t-------
Single Family i 8.61056e �i 0.0464 0.3968 0.1688 i 2.5300e- i i 0.0321 i 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0000 i 459.4925 i 459.4925 i 8.8100e- i 8.4200e- 462.2889
Housing i +006 003 . i 003 003 i
--------- ---------r------�'-------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '--------------- +-------r------� '-------'------- '------- tei i i i i i i i i i i '*-------
Strip Mall 81200 �i 4.4000e- i 3.9800e- i 3.3400e- i 2.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1 4.3331 4.3331 i 8.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 4.3595
004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004
� i 005 i 005
� i � i i � i � � �
----------- '-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+---- - ------'-------'-------'------- �------ter------i i i i i i i i -r i i i -----------------
Apartments Mid 1.79906e �i 9.7000e- 0.0829 i 0.0353 i 5.3000e- i 6.7000e- i 6.7000e- i i 6.7000e- 6.7000e- 0.0000 i 96.0048 i 96.0048 i 1.8400e- 1.7600e- 96.5891
Rise i +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 003 i
Total
0.1849
1.6476
1.1668
0.0101
0.1278
0.1278
0.1278
0.1278
0.0000
1,829.976
1,829.976
0.0351
0.0336
1,841.113
6
6
6
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 49 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
City Park 0 �i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
---------- ;I'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+----- -I '-------'------- '------- -�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
General Office i 15512.5 -i 8.000Oe- i 7.6000e- 6.4000e- i 0.0000 i 6.000Oe- i 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.8278 0.8278 i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.8328
Building 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 . i 005 005 i
General Office 220278 :i 1.1900e- i 0.0108 i 9.0700e- i 6.000Oe- i 8.2000e- i 8.2000e- i i 8.2000e- 8.2000e- 0.0000 1 11.7549 i 11.7549 i 2.3000e- 2.2000e- 11.8264
Building i .� 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . i 004 004 i
--------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
General Office 31025 q 1.7000e- i 1.5200e- i 1.2800e- i 1.000Oe- i 1.2000e- i 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 i 1.6556 1.6556 i 3.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- 1.6657
Building i .� 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . i005 005
--ter �- t- ---- --
i i i i i i i i i i i
Golf Course i 0 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
.1
-------- ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------� '-------'-------'------- -�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
Hotel 9.01788e q 0.0486 i 0.4421 i 0.3713 i 2.6500e- i 0.0336 i 0.0336 i i 0.0336 0.0336 0.0000 i 481.2285 i 481.2285 i 9.2200e- i 8.8200e- 484.1572
+006 .: 003 . i 003 003 i
- ------ -�'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------------'-------'-------'-------
Hotel 9.19672e q 0.0496 i 0.4508 i 0.3787 i 2.7000e- i 0.0343 i 0.0343 i 0.0343 0.0343 0.0000 i 490.7721 i 490.7721 i 9.4100e- 9.000Oe- i 493.7589
i +006 .: 003 . i 003 003 i
---------- -�------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------'-------'-------'------- --ter +-------
�-
Other Asphalt 0 i i i i i i i i i i i
0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
.i
Surfaces
Quality 1.32625e �i 7.1500e- i 0.0650 i 0.0546 i 3.9000e- i 4.9400e- i 4.9400e- i 4.9400e- 4.9400e- 0.0000 i 70.7735 i 70.7735 i 1.3600e- 1.3000e- 71.2042
Restaurant i +006 .: 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 003 003 i
---- - -- - ter - - ----i i i i i i i i r---- - -i i i '*-------
Single Family 7.54657e �i 0.0407 i 0.3477 i 0.1480 i 2.2200e- i 0.0281 i 0.0281 i i 0.0281 0.0281 0.0000 i 402.7139 402.7139 i 7.7200e- i 7.3800e- 405.1647
Housing i +006 003 . i 003 003 i
Strip Mall 70595 q 3.8000e- i 3.4600e- i 2.9100e- i 2.000Oe- i 2.6000e- i 2.6000e- i i 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 0.0000 1 3.7672 i 3.7672 i 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 3.7901
i .: 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 i 005
i � � i � i i � �
----------- '-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+------ ------'-------'-------'------- �------ter------i i i i i i i i -r i i i *-------
Apartments Mid 1.56923e q 8.4600e- i 0.0723 i 0.0308 i 4.6000e- i 5.8500e- i 5.8500e- i i 5.8500e- 5.8500e- 0.0000 1 83.7403 i 83.7403 i 1.6100e- 1.5400e- 84.2499
Rise i +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 003 003 i
Apartments Mid 836925 �i 4.5100e- 0.0386 i 0.0164 i 2.5000e- i 3.1200e- i 3.1200e- i i 3.1200e- 3.1200e- 0.0000 i 44.6615 i 44.6615 i 8.6000e- 8.2000e- 44.9333
Rise 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 004 004 i
Total
0.1609
1.4330
1.0137
8.7600e-
0.1111
0.1111
0.1111
0.1111
0.0000
1,591.895
1,591.895
0.0305
0.0292
1,601.583
003
2
2
2
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 50 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
I
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 308387 •i 88.2502 i 4.0600e- 8.4000e- 88.5956
Rise i ;� i 003 004
-----------------J---------------*-------
Apartments Mid 578226 •i 165.4691 i 7.6100e- i 1.5700e- 166.1167
Rise 003 003
--------- �i-------�------- -------*----- -
City Park 0 .i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
--------- �i-------j------- ------- -------
General Office 106900 •i 30.5912 i 1.4100e- i 2.9000e- 30.7110
Building i ;� i 003 004
-----------------j-------i-------*-------
General Office 53450 •i 15.2956 i 7.000Oe- i 1.5000e- 15.3555
Building i ;� i 004 004
--------- ;i-------j-------j-------*-------
General Office 758990 •1 217.1978 i 9.9800e- i 2.0700e- 218.0478
Building 003 003
------- ---- ---- ------ ----- - -*- - - - - - -
Golf Course 0 .i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
i •�
__ _
Hotel 3.37293e •i 965.2203 i 0.0444 9.1800e- 968.9977
+006 003
---------- �i-------�------- -------*-------
Hotel 3.43982e •i 984.3623 i 0.0453 i 9.3600e- 988.2146
+006 ;: i 003
----------- --------------j-------I-------*-------
Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Surfaces
i i i
Quality 262000 •i 74.9757 i 3.4500e- i 7.1000e- 75.2691
Restaurant i ;� i 003 004
--------- ------------- -------*-------
Single Family 1.95831e •i 560.4030 i 0.0258 i 5.3300e- 562.5961
Housing +006 ;� i 003
--------- ---- ---J,- ------ ----- --*-------
Strip Mall 548100 •i 156.8481 i 7.2100e- i 1.4900e- 157.4619
003 003
Total
3,258.613
0.1498
0.0310
3,271.366
4
1
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 51 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
I
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 263141 •i 75.3024 i 3.4600e- 7.2000e- 75.5971
Rise i ;� i 003 004
-----------------J---------------*-------
Apartments Mid 493390 •i 141.1920 i 6.4900e- i 1.3400e- 141.7445
Rise 003 003
--------- �i-------�------- -------*----- -
City Park 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
--------- �i-------j------- ------- -------
General Office 40262.5 •i 11.5218 i 5.3000e- i 1.1000e- 11.5669
Building 004 004
---------- -------j------- J-------*-------
General Office 571728 •1 163.6095 1 7.5200e- 1 1.5600e- 164.2498
Building i ;� 1 003 003
-------- -------------- ------- -------
General Office 80525 •i 23.0436 i 1.0600e- i 2.2000e- 23.1338
Building 003 004
------- ---- ---- ------ ----- - -*- - - - - - -
Golf Course 0 .i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
i •�
__ _
Hotel 2.66548e •i 762.7717 i 0.0351 i 7.2500e- 765.7568
+006 003
---------- �i-------j------- I -------*-------
Hotel 2.71834e •i 777.8988 0.0358 i 7.4000e- 780.9431
+006 ;: i 003
----------- --------------j-------I-------*-------
Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Surfaces
i
Quality 228678 •i 65.4399 i 3.0100e- i 6.2000e- 65.6960
Restaurant i ;� i 003 004
--------- ------- -------
Single Family 1.65656e •i 474.0519 i 0.0218 i 4.5100e- 475.9071
Housing +006 003
--------- ---- ---J,- ------ ----- --*-------
Strip Mall 385350 •i 110.2744 i 5.0700e- i 1.0500e- 110.7060
003 003
Total
2,605.105
0.1198
0.0248
2,615.301
8
0
6.0 Area Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 52 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non -Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non -Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
ROG
NOx
CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
177Total
CO2
I CH4
N20
I CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 5.0990
i 0.0419 3.6225 1.9000e-
i i 0.0571
i 0.0571
i i 0.0567
0.0567
0.0000 i 538.9368 i 538.9368 i 0.0160
i 9.7700e- i 542.3020
Unmitigated 8.5350
- 0.0419 3.6225 1.9000e-
0.0571
0.0571
0.0567
0.0567
0.0000 538.9368 538.9368 - 0.0160
• 9.7700e- 542.3020
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 53 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 3.8749 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
Coating
i
Consumer •i 4.4956 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Products
----- ----•r------j------- j------- j------- j------- j------- j------- j------- j--------- ----- -_---- --r---------- - --- ------ ----- --*-------
Hearth •i 0.0539 i 0.0000 i 2.9400e- i 0.0000 i 0.0372 i 0.0372 i i 0.0368 0.0368 0.0000 i 533.0420 i 533.0420 0.0102 i 9.7700e- i 536.2860
003 . 1 003 i
Landscaping •1 0.1106 0.0419 i 3.6196 i 1.9000e- 0.0199 i 0.0199 i i 0.0199 0.0199 0.0000 i 5.8948 i 5.8948 i 5.7700e- i 0.0000 i 6.0160
004 003
Total
8.5350
0.0419
3.6225
1.9000e-
0.0571
0.0571
0.0567
0.0567
0.0000
538.9368
538.9368
0.0160
9.7700e-
542.3020
11
004
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 54 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Subcategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 0.7750 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
Coating
i i i i i
Consumer •i 4.1595 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Products
----- ----•r------j------- j------- j------- j------- j------- j------- j------- j---------------_---- --r-------------------- -------*-------
Hearth •i 0.0539 i 0.0000 i 2.9400e- i 0.0000 i 0.0372 i 0.0372 i i 0.0368 0.0368 0.0000 i 533.0420 i 533.0420 0.0102 i 9.7700e- i 536.2860
003 . 1 003 i
Landscaping •1 0.1106 0.0419 i 3.6196 i 1.9000e- 0.0199 i 0.0199 i i 0.0199 0.0199 0.0000 i 5.8948 i 5.8948 i 5.7700e- i 0.0000 i 6.0160
004 003
Total
5.0990
0.0419
3.6225
1.9000e-
0.0571
0.0571
0.0567
0.0567
0.0000
538.9368
538.9368
0.0160
9.7700e-
542.3020
11
004
003
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Apply Water Conservation Strategy
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 55 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 827.0313 i 1.5915 0.0444
i 874.2224
- - - - - - - - - - - %.............. +------- - ----} ------ * - - - - - - -
Unmitigated 1,041.499 - 1.9897 0.0556
1,100.518
8
7
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O13.2.2 Page 56 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
door Use
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 1 14.9854 / •1 90.6286 0.4923 i 0.0124 1 104.7932
Rise i 9.44733
1 1
City Park 1 0 / •1 132.5833 6.0900e- 1.2600e- 1 133.1021
41.7018 003 1 003
1 1
General Office 1 15.2851 / •1 91.5890 0.5021 0.0126 1 106.0336
Building 1 9.36829 ;1 1 1
1 1
Golf Course 1 0 / •1 566.3200 0.0260 5.3900e- 1 568.5363
1 178.126 ; 1 1 003
1 1
Hotel 1 8.6247 / •1 37.9201 0.2827 6.9700e- 1 46.0167
0.9583 003 i
1 1
Other Asphalt 1 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000
I q I
Surfaces 1 •1 1 1 1
1 1
Other Non- 1 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces 1
1 1
Quality 1 1.51767 / •1 6.4446 0.0497 1.2200e- 1 7.8684
Restaurant 10.0968725: 1 1 003
1 1
Single Family 1 16.6143 / •1 100.4795 0.5458 0.0137 1 116.1838
Housing i 10.4742
1 1
Strip Mall 1 2.59254 / •1 15.5346 0.0852 2.1300e- 1 17.9846
j 1.58898 003
Total
1,041.499
1.9897
0.0556
1,100.518
11
8
j
1
7
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 57 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
I
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 11.9883 / •i 70.9524 i 0.3937 i 9.8600e- 82.2781
Rise i 7.55787 ;i 003
-- t-------+i------- -------------- -------
City Park 0 / •1 106.0666 4.8800e- 1.0100e- 106.4817
33.3615 ;i i 003 003
------------------ �i-------�--------------*-------
General Office 12.2281 / •1 71.6898 i 0.4016 i 0.0101 83.2392
Building i 7.49463 ;
__ _ i .i i i
Golf Course 0 / •i 453.0560 0.0208 i 4.3100e- 454.8290
142.501 ;i i 003
--------- 4i------- -------------- -------
Hotel 1 6.89976 / •i 29.4438 0.2261 5.5700e- 35.9175
0.76664 ;i i 003
----------- t-------+i------- -------------- -------
Other Asphalt 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Surfaces i
i
Other Non- 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces
---------+i-- ----------- ----- - - -*- - - - - - -
Quality 1.21413 / •1 4.9986 0.0398 9.8000e- 6.1371
Restaurant i 0.077498 .1 i 004
------------------4i------------- ---- ---- * - - - - - - -
Single Family 13.2914 / •i 78.6647 i 0.4365 i 0.0109 91.2213
Housing i 8.37937 ;
Strip Mall 2.07403 / •i 12.1595 0.0681 i 1.7100e- 14.1184
1.27118 ;i 003
Total
827.0313
1.5915
0.0444
874.2224
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 58 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
CategoryNear
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 45.3238
i 2.6786 0.0000
i 101.5736
- - - - - - - - - - - %.............. +------- - ----}............
- ------ * - - - - - - -
Unmitigated •• 181.2953
10.7142 0.0000
406.2944
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 59 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
I
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 105.8 :i 21.4764 1 1.2692 i 0.0000 i 48.1301
Rise i .' i i
i i
City Park 3.01 -i 0.6110 0.0361 0.0000 i 1.3693
------------------ �i-------�--------------
General Office 79.98 •i 16.2352 i 0.9595 i 0.0000 36.3842
Building •'
_ i
-t-------�i-------�-------------- -------
Golf Course 139.03 �i 28.2218 1.6679 i 0.0000 i 63.2470
---------- �i-------�-------------- *-------
84.6826Hotel 186.15
�37.7868 2.2331 0.0000
----------- t------- �i------- -------------- -------
0 Asphalt 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Surfaces i
i
Other Non- 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces •'
i
---- - - - - - -- ----------- ----- - - -*- - - - - - -
Quality 4.56 •1 0.9256 0.0547 0.0000 2.0744
Restaurant
Single Family 337.84 �i 68.5785 i 4.0529 i 0.0000 1 153.6888
Housing
Strip Mall 36.75 �i 7.4599 1 0.4409 0.0000 1 16.7182
ETotal
181.2953
1 10.7142
1 0.0000
406.2944
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 60 of 60 Date: 10/7/2014 12:23 PM
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
I
I
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 26.45 •1 5.3691 1 0.3173 1 0.0000 12.0325
Rise i i �i
i i �
--------- --------j-------j-------*-------
City Park 0.7525 •i 0.1528 9.0300e- 0.0000 0.3423
003 1
------------------�i-------�--------------*-------
General Office 19.995 •i 4.0588 i 0.2399 i 0.0000 9.0960
Building •�
_ i
-t-------+i------- -------------- -------
Golf Course 34.7575 �i 7.0555 0.4170 0.0000 i 15.8117
---------- �i--------------------- -------
-1 46.5375 -i 9.4467 0.5583 i 0.0000 i 21.1707
----------- t------- �i------- -------------- -------
0 Asphalt 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Surfaces i
i
Other Non- 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces •�
i
---- - - - - - -- ----------- ----- - - -*- - - - - - -
Quality 1.14 •1 0.2314 0.0137 i 0.0000 0.5186
Restaurant
i
Single Family 84.46 �i 17.1446 i 1.0132 i 0.0000 i 38.4222
Housing
Strip Mall 9.1875 -i 1.8650 0.1102 0.0000 i 4.1795
ETotal
I 1�
45.3238
1 2.6786
1 0.0000
101.5736
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Vegetation
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
SilverRock Addendum
Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
10.00 i
1000sgft
; 0.23 10,000.00
0
--
General Office Building
_------------------------------
71.00 +
-----------------------------------
1000sgft ; 2.50 71,000.00 -+
-------
0
-----------------------------
General Office Building
------------------------------_
5.00 +
----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
1000sgft ; 0.11 5,000.00 - 1
- -- - - --
0
-----------------------------_
Other Asphalt Surfaces
------------------------------_
37.00 +
------------------ -- -- ----- -- -------------- - - - - ------- - - - - --
Acre ; 37.00 0.00 - 1
-- - - - --
0
------------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------------
User Defined Recreational
4.00 +
---- --------;-----------
User Defined Unit ; 4.00 0.00 - 1
--- - - --
0
-----------------------------_-
CityPark
-----------------------------_
35.00 +
-----------------------------------------------------i----- - - - - --
Acre ; 35.00 0.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Golf Course
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
134.50 +
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------- 1- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Acre ; 134.50 5,000.00 - 1
- - - - - - -
0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ _ . - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _-- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 1- - - - - - - - - - - -
- . _ _ _ _ _
Golf Course
15.00 +
Acre
; 15.00 0.00 1
0
------------------------------_
Hotel
-------------------------------
140.00
------------------------------ =--------------- -------- - - - - --
Room ; 17.00 166,400.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
+
-------------------------------
Hotel
------------------------------_
200.00
------------------------------=----------------- -------- - - - - --
Room ; 10.00 169,700.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
+
--- ---- - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_------------------------------
Quality Restaurant
5.00 +
---- -------- --------- -;-------------
1000sgft ; 0.11 5,000.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
-----------------------------_-
-----------------------------_
----------------- --- -- ----- --------------- - - - - ---------- - - - - -- -+
- - - - --
artments Mid Rise
Apartments
150.00
+ Dwelling Unit
; 10.50 150,000.00
270
-----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------------
Apartments
artments Mid Rise
80.00 +
---- --------;-------------
Dwelling Unit ; 2.11 75,000.00 -+
-- - - --
144
--------- - --- - -- ----------_-
Single FamilyHousing
-----------------------------_
255.00 +
-----------------------------------------------------i-------- - - - - --
Dwelling Unit ; 56.50 459,000.00 -+
- - - - --
824
Strip Mall
35.00
1000sgft
25.50 35,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 3.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 20
Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
CO2Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - PA 1: 10,000 sf conference room, 15 acres modified existing golfcourse; PA 2: 140 hotel rooms; PA 3: 35 single family units; PA 4: 71,000 sf shared
services/conference center;
PA 5 200 hotel rooms; PA 6: 60 luxury branded units; PA 7: 25,000 sf retail, 150 apartment units;
PA 8: 160 units; PA 9: 15,000 sf retail, 80 apartment units; PA 10: 5,000 sf new clubhouse, 134.5 acre golf course
PA 11: 35 acre park; PA 12: 4 acres trails, 37 acres streets/landscaping
Construction Phase - Based on estimated construction schedule of 8 years
Trips and VMT - Per CalEEMod User's Guide for trip generation
On -road Fugitive Dust - Assume Paved Roads
Grading -
Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Trips - Water Well Sites and All American Canal
Road Dust - Paved Roads
Woodstoves - No woodstoves
Area Coating - No negative
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater -
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - Tier 3 required per CARB. SCAQMD Rule 403 and 403.1.
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 1113
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaMitigation•UseLowVOCPaintNonresidential ExteriorV- 250 50
alue
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
tblAreaMitigation
• UseLowVOCPai ntNon residential I nteriorV • 250
50
alue
----------------g------------
tblAreaMiti ation
+------------------------------f-------------------------------
• UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorValu 250 i
--------------------------
50
• -------e-------------
+
}-------------
t----------------
-------------
tblAreaMiti ation
g
• UseLowVOCPaintResidentiallnteriorValu
i 250 i
50
------------- --- ----- --- -----+-
e
- --------------------------
I
- ¢-----------------------------
--------------------------
tblConstDustMiti ation
Clean Paved Road PercentReduction
a 0
80
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ �
--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
°v 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
1.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------j�--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
a 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
T 0.00
3.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
------------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
T 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------$--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------+------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
°v 0.00
2.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
4.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
i 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
9.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----------------- -------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
} No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier
------------ ------ ------ ------ �
s No Change
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------------ ------ ------ ------ �
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------+------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
-----------------------------
s No Change
--------------------------
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-} ----- ------ ------------------ -4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
i No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------_------------------------------j�------------------------------4--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
a No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------_------------------------------
------------------------------4
--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
v No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
-----------------------------
Tier
-�------------------------------4--------------------------
? No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
} No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
-------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
-
; Tier
----------------4--------------------------
v No Change ;
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------
4 No Change
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier 3
_-----_tblConstructionPhase ----------------------
____________NumDays--_---__----�-----------------------------T--------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
; NumDays
6,200.00
1,161.00
-----------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
------------------------------
NumDa s
------------------------------4--------------------------
°v 440.00
43.00
____-_-tblConstructionPhase ______
_________PhaseEndDate__--_--------------------
------------T-___--___----
--------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseEndDate
i023
4
10/2/2023
10/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
4
4/18/2019
4/19/2019
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseEndDate
$ 2/21/2024
12/20/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
10/2/2023
8/1/2019
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseStartDate
4
- 4/20/2019
4/19/2019
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
12/2/2016
12/3/2016
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
4 12/23/2023
10/23/2023
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWood Mass
4
i 457.60
0.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------
FireplaceWood Mass
------------------------------ 4
i 457.60
0.00
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
tblFire laces
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . . . _ - .. . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ .
NumberWood
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
s 25.50
_ _ _ _ . _ . _ . - . . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
Land UseS- uareFeet
_�----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -4
1,611,720.00
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
0.00
-----------------------------+-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Land UseSquareFeet
------------------------------4--------------------------
°v 174,240.00
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _.. _ _ _ . .. _ . . . .
Land UseS- uareFeet
_L----- ------------------------ t
fi 1,524,600.00
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
0.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
_-----------------------------}------------------------------4--------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
i 5,858,820.00
5,000.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
------------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
------------------------------4
v 653,400.00
--------------------------
0.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
203,280.00
166,400.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
290,400.00
169,700.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
80,000.00
75,000.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
-----------------------------$------------------------------4------------
LotAcreag
4 1.63
-------------
2.50
e
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
LotAcrea
_L----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 4.67
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ .. _ _
17.00
e
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . . . .
LotAcreage
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
6.67
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - - _ _ _
10.00
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
3.95
10.50
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
4------------------------------
LotAcreage
�----------------------------- 4--------------------------
v 82.79
56.50
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblLandUse
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LotAcreage
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 0.80
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.50
----------tblLandUse----------=-----------Population
------------------
-------------------------------4--------------------------
485.00
-----------------------------_----------------------------
tblLandUse
Population
-j�-----------------------------
i 258.00
--------------------------
144.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
------------------------------
Haul in PercentPave
-----------------------------
v 50.00
--------------------------
100.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
_------------9-----------------�--------------------------------------------------------
Haul in PercentPave
i 50.00
100.00
-----------------------------Y------------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
Haul in PercentPave
--------------------------------------------------------
i 50.00
100.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblOnRoadDust
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - . _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ . .
Haul in PercentPave
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
4 50.00
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _
100.00
-----------------------------Y------------g----------------
tblOnRoadDust
Haul in PercentPave
-$--------------------------------------------------------
50.00
100.00
-----------------------------+------------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
VendorPercentPave
--------------------------------------------------------
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
Vend orPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
VendorPercentPave
4
T 50.00
100.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
_------------------------------
VendorPercentPave
g--------------------------------------------------------
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
Vend orPercentPave
4
50.00
100 00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
i 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblOnRoadDust
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. - _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _
WorkerPercentPave
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 50.00
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ - _
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
4
a 2014
2020
-----------------------------_-----------------------------
tblRoadDust
RoadPercentPave
------------------------------
4 50
-------------- -----------
100
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
4
i 449.00
186.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblTripsAndVMT
Y _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . - .. - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . - _
WorkerTripNumber
_L----- ------ ------ ------ ------ t
ii4 1,262.00
_ . _ - . _ . _ . - _ . _ _ . _ . - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
583.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblTripsAndVMT
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ .
WorkerTripNumber
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
4 252.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
117.00
-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
+------------------y-----------�------------------------------4--------------------------
NumberCatal tic
i 11.50
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblWoodstoves
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
NumberCatal tic
_r------ ------ ------ ------ ------ t
i 12.75
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _
0.00
-----------------------------
Y-----------------------------
4-------------------------------____._____-_____-.____--__
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
11.50
0.00
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
12.75
0.00
-----------------------------
4------------------------------
----------------------------- 4--------------------------
tblWoodstoves
; Wood stove DayYear
82.00 ;
0.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - ------------------------------ t
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblWoodstoves
Wood stove Da Year
Y
°v 82.00
0.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
+ 999.60
0.00
r
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2016 •i 6.5845 i 74.9254 50.4206 i 0.0637 18.2169 3.5853 i 21.1565 9.9706 i 3.2985 12.6751 0.0000 i 6,573.530 6,573.530 i 1.9447 0.0000 i 6,614.367
'� i i i i i i i i ■ 0 i 0 i 8
2017 •1 6.1938 i 69.6937 i 47.9636 i 0.0637 i 8.8407 i 3.3183 i 12.1589 i 3.6409 � 3.0528 6.6937 � 0.0000 i 6,465.447 i 6,465.447 i 1.9434 i 0.0000 i 6,506.258
2018 •i 5.3751 i 59.6271 43.3598 0.0637 8.8407 i 2.7891 i 11.6297 i 3.6409 i 2.5660 6.2068 0.0000 1 6,359.021 i 6,359.021 i 1.9425 i 0.0000 6,399.813
'� i i i i i i i i ■ 6 i 6 i i i 7
2019 •i 74.3169 i 87.4119 i 105.5872 i 0.1776 i 14.6210 i 4.0290 i 18.6500 i 5.1906 i 3.7329 8.9235 0.0000 1 15,825.33 i 15,825.33 i 2.8178 1 0.0000 i 15,884.50
36
00 00 i �
----------------- j------- j------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i-------i--------------- ------ j-------j-------i------- i
2020 •i 73.6575 i 31.8188 67.4706 0.1282 i 6.7588 i 1.4471 i 8.2059 i 1.8091 1.3631 3.1722 0.0000 1 10,371.50 i 10,371.50 i 0.9221 1 0.0000 1 10,390.86
05 05 i 49
2021 •i 73.1889 i 28.3449 i 64.7919 i 0.1282 i 6.7587 i 1.2486 i 8.0073 i 1.8091 1.1759 2.9850 0.0000 1 10,298.11 i 10,298.11 i 0.9055 i 0.0000 i 10,317.12
59
OS 05 i �
---- ------------------------------------------------------i-------j--------------- ------ �-------�-------�-------i
2022 •i 72.8293 i 25.6363 62.8285 i 0.1282 6.7585 1.0847 i 7.8431 1.8090 i 1.0216 2.8306 0.0000 i 10,227.00 10,227.00 i 0.8936 0.0000 1 10,245.77
86 86 i 38
, i
----------- ------------- i------- j------- i------- i------- i ------- i-------i--------------- ------ i------- J-------J,-------
2023 •i 72.5078 i 23.5060 i 60.8198 i 0.1281 i 6.7583 i 0.9585 i 7.7168 i 1.8089 i 0.9025 2.7114 0.0000 i 10,160.03 i 10,160.03 i 0.8808 1 0.0000 1 10,178.53
61
94 94 i �
i
Total
384.6537
400.9641
503.2419
0.8813
77.5534
18.4606
95.3683
29.6791
17.1132
46.1983
0.0000
76,279.98
76,279.98
12.2503
0.0000
76,537.24
83
83
39
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2016 •i 1.6179 i 29.8914 39.2264 i 0.0637 6.7394 i 1.3245 i 7.7015 i 3.6936 i 1.3244 4.6555 0.0000 i 6,573.530 i 6,573.530 i 1.9447 0.0000 i 6,614.367
'� i i i i i i i ■ 0 i 0 i i i 8
2017 •i 1.6075 � 29.8815 i 39.1018 i 0.0637 i 3.2645 i 1.3245 i 4.5889 i 1.3483 i 1.3244 � 2.6727 � 0.0000 i 6,465.447 i 6,465.447 i 1.9434 i 0.0000 � 6,506.258
'� i i i i i i i ■ 1 7 i 7 i i i 1
----------•r-------------j---------------- j------- j---------------- j------ -�---------------------- -------------- ------- *---- -
r------
2018 •i 1.5984 i 29.8731 � 38.9962 i 0.0637 � 3.2645 i 1.3244 i 4.5889 i 1.3483 i 1.3244 � 2.6727 0.0000 i 6,359.021 i 6,359.021 i 1.9425 i 0.0000 i 6,399.813
2019 •i 72.4295 � 56.2030 i 103.9368 i 0.1776 i 5.1221 i 2.4640 i 7.5862 i 1.9352 i 2.4451 � 4.3802 � 0.0000 i 15,825.33 i 15,825.33 i 2.8178 i 0.0000 i 15,884.50
2020 •i 72.0347 i 26.5822 � 68.4787 i 0.1282 � 2.1555 i 1.2200 i 3.3755 i 0.6793 i 1.2023 1.8816 � 0.0000 i 10,371.50 i 10,371.50 i 0.9221 i 0.0000 i 10,390.86
�� ■ 05 05 i 49
2021 •i 71.8076 i 25.0090 i 66.0847 i 0.1282 � 2.1554 i 1.1963 i 3.3517 i 0.6792 i 1.1806 1.8598 � 0.0000 i 10,298.11 i 10,298.11 i 0.9055 i 0.0000 � 10,317.12
�� ■ 05 05 i 59
---------- •r-------------j------- j------- j------- j------- j------- j------- j-------- -------_-------------- -------------- -------*-------
2022 •i 71.6562 i 24.2226 i 64.3354 i 0.1282 2.1552 i 1.1939 i 3.3491 i 0.6791 i 1.1784 1.8575 0.0000 i 10,227.00 i 10,227.00 i 0.8936 0.0000 i 10,245.77
�� ■ 86 86 i 38
----------•r-------�------------------------------------------i-------j---------------_------r-------------i-------j-------*-------
2023 •i 71.4806 23.4215 i 62.4475 i 0.1281 2.1550 i 1.1877 i 3.3427 i 0.6790 i 1.1727 1.8517 0.0000 i 10,160.03 i 10,160.03 i 0.8808 i 0.0000 i 10,178.53
Total
364.2323
245.0841
482.6074
0.8813
27.0116
11.2352
37.8844
11.0420
11.1522
21.8317
0.0000
76,279.98
76,279.98
12.2503
0.0000
76,537.24
83
83
39
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
5.31
38.88
4.10
0.00
65.17
39.14
60.28
62.80
34.83
52.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reduction
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area •i 48.4088 i 0.4650 40.2888 i 2.1200e- 1.1287 i 1.1287 i i 1.1191 1.1191 0.0000 i 14,403.37 i 14,403.37 i 0.3453 0.2627 i 14,492.07
003 ■ 57 57 i 67
Energy •i 1.0132 i 9.0278 i 6.3936 i 0.0553 i i 0.7000 i 0.7000 i i 0.7000 0.7000 11,053.17 i 11,053.17 i 0.2119 i 0.2026 11,120.44
�� ■ 23 23 i 01
Mobile •i 38.2888 i 73.8235 i 354.8991 i 0.6377 41.0810 i 1.2988 i 42.3799 i 10.9670 i 1.1965 12.1635 i 49,384.89 i 49,384.89 i 1.9000 i i 49,424.79
Total
87.7107
83.3163
401.5815
0.6951
41.0810
3.1275
44.2085
10.9670
3.0156
13.9826
0.0000
74,841.44
74,841.44
2.4572
0.4654
75,037.31
56
56
52
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area •i 29.5811 i 0.4650 40.2888 i 2.1200e- 1.1287 i 1.1287 1.1191 1.1191 0.0000 i 14,403.37 14,403.37 i 0.3453 i 0.2627 i 14,492.07
003 . 57 57 i 67
Energy •i 0,8814 i 7.8522 5.5544 i 0.0481 0.6090 i 0.6090 i 0.6090 0.6090 i 9,615.145 9,615.145 i 0.1843 i 0.1763 1 9,673.661
7 i 7 i i i 9
Mobile •i 35.1441 i 51.9167 273.0431 i 0.3814 23.5980 0.7891 i 24.3871 6.2997 i 0.7270 7.0268 29,510.15 29,510.15 i 1.2226 29,535.83
Total
65.6066
60.2339
318.8863
0.4316
23.5980
2.5267
26.1247
6.2997
2.4551
0.0000
53,528.68
53,528.68
1.7523
0.4390
�8.7548
11
11
F3,701.57
33
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
25.20
27.70
20.59
37.91
42.56
19.21
40.91
42.56
18.59
37.39
0.00
28.48
28.48
28.69
5.66
28.43
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 -Site Preparation 'Site Preparation
! 1/1/2016
112/1/2016
5:
240:
i
i
2 •Grading +Grading
!12/3/2016
i4/19/2019
5
620:
i
i
3 •Building Construction +Building Construction
!4/19/2019
i 10/1/2023
5:
1161
i
i
4 •Architectural Coating !Architectural Coating
!8/1/2019
:12/22/2023
5
1147:
i
i
5 -Paving -Paving
:10/23/2023
-12/20/2023
5•
43,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1550
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 1,385,100; Residential Outdoor: 461,700; Non -Residential Indoor: 3,630,960; Non -Residential Outdoor: 1,210,320
(Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor
Site Preparation
+Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3; 8.00E
255'
0.40
---------------------------
Site Preparation
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 4; 8.00E
t--------------
97,
0.37
--------------------------
Grading
-------------
+Excavators ; 2; 8.00E
--------------
162'
0.38
---------------------------
Grading
--------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Graders ; 1; 8.00E
174'
0.41
----------------------------
Grading
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------t--------------
+Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 ; 8.00E
255'
0.40
----------------------------r--------------------------
Grading
-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Scrapers ; 2E 8.00E
361,
0.48
----------------------------
Grading
------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2E 8.00E
--------------
97'
0.37
----------------------------
Building Construction
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Cranes i 1; 7.00E
226'
0.29
----------------------------
Building Construction
r- --- - - - - - +------------+-------------t--------------
+Forklifts i 3; 8.00E
89'
0.20
----------------------------�--------------------------
Building Construction
-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Generator Sets ; 1 ; 8.00E
84'
0.74
----------------------------
Building Construction
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3; 7.00E
97'
0.37
----------------------------
Building Construction
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Welders ; 1; 8.00E
46'
0.45
----------------------------
Architectural Coating
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Air Compressors ; 1 ; 6.00E
78'
0.48
----------------------------
Paving
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Pavers i 2; 8.00E
125'
0.42
----------------------------
Paving
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Paving Equipment i 2; 8.00E
130'
0.36
------------------- ------ ---f
--------------------------+-----------------i-------------T-------------r
-------------
Paving
:Rollers 2- 8.00,
80,
0.38
Trips and VMT
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling
Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7:
18.00
0.001
0.00;
11.00:
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
IHHDT
----------------
Grading
8;
-------------------------------
20.00:
0.00: 0.00:
4
11.00:
----------------------------------
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
':---------------------
EHDT Mix
IHHDT
----------------�--------------�
Building Construction
9:
----- - i----------=---------
583.00-
186.00: 0.00:
---------------------------------------------':---
11.00:
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
----------------
:HDT_Mix
IHHDT
-------------
ArchitecturalCoating
1;
----------
117.00-
---------
0.00i 0.00i
----------4----------=------------
11.00:
5.40:
----- ----
20.00:LD_Mix
----------I
EHDT_Mix
---------
:HHDT
r----------}----------r---------+------------
'
- -
�_-------------------------------
-------------------+----------
-- ----
Paving
6;
15.00,
0.00,
0.00,
11.00,
5.40,
20.00TLD_Mix
HDT_Mix
rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust -1 18.0663 0.0000 i 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 � i i 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road -1 5.0771 i 54.6323 i 41.1053 0.0391 i 2.9387 i 2.9387 i 2.7036 2.7036 i 4,065.005 i 4,065.005 i 1.2262 i i 4,090.754
3 i 3 i i i 4
Total
5.0771
54.6323
41.1053
0.0391
18.0663
2.9387
21.0049
9.9307
2.7036
12.6343
4,065.005
4,065.005
1.2262
4,090.754
11
3
3
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0946 i 0.1005 1.1548 1.7600e- i 0.1506 i 9.9000e- i 0.1516 0.0400 i 9.000Oe- 0.0409 142.6944 142.6944 i 8.7000e- i i 142.8771
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0946
0.1005
1.1548
1.7600e-
0.1506
9.9000e-
0.1516
0.0400
9.000Oe-
0.0409
142.6944
142.6944
8.7000e-
142.8771
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 6.6936 0.0000 6.6936 i 3.6793 0.0000 3.6793 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road •1 0.9515 i 19.4584 i 23.4003 0.0391 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.0000 i 4,065.005 i 4,065.005 i 1.2262 4,090.754
3 i 3 i i i 4
Total
0.9515
19.4584
23.4003
0.0391
6.6936
0.9611
7.6546
3.6793
0.9611
4.6404
0.0000
4,065.005
4,065.005
1.2262
4:090.754
11
3
3
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0946 i 0.1005 1.1548 1.7600e- i 0.0459 i 9.9000e- i 0.0469 0.0142 i 9.000Oe- 0.0152 + i 142.6944 142.6944 i 8.7000e- i i 142.8771
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0946
0.1005
1.1548
1.7600e-
0.0459
9.9000e-
0.0469
0.0142
9.000Oe-
0.0152
142.6944
142.6944
8.7000e-
142.8771
003
004
004
003
3.3 Grading - 2016
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 6,4795 i 74.8137 i 49.1374 0.0617 i 3.5842 3.5842 i 3.2975 3.2975 i 6,414,980 i 6,414.980 1,9350 i 6,455.615
7 i 7 i i i 4
Total
6.4795
74.8137
49.1374
0.0617
8.6733
3.5842
12.2576
3.5965
3.2975
6.8940
6,414.980
6,414.980
1.9350
6,455.615
7
7
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.3 Grading - 2016
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.1051 i 0.1117 1.2832 1.9500e- i 0.1673 i 1.0900e- i 0.1684 0.0444 i 1.0100e- 0.0454 + i 158.5493 158.5493 i 9.6700e- i i 158.7524
003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.1051
0.1117
1.2832
1.9500e-
0.1673
1.0900e-
0.1684
0.0444
1.0100e-
0.0454
158.5493
158.5493
9.6700e-
158.7524
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 3.2135 0.0000 3.2135 i 1.3325 0.0000 1.3325 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road 1.5128 i 29.7798 i 37.9432 0.0617 i 1.3234 1.3234 i 1.3234 1.3234 0.0000 i 6,414.980 i 6,414.980 1.9350 i 6,455.615
7 i 7 i i i 4
Total
1.5128
29.7798
37.9432
0.0617
3.2135
1.3234
4.5369
1.3325
1.3234
2.6559
0.0000
6,414.980
6,414.980
1.9350
6,455.615
11
7
7
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.3 Grading - 2016
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.1051 i 0.1117 1.2832 1.9500e- i 0.0510 i 1.0900e- i 0.0521 0.0158 i 1.0100e- 0.0168 + i 158.5493 158.5493 i 9.6700e- i i 158.7524
003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.1051
0.1117
1.2832
1.9500e-
0.0510
1.0900e-
0.0521
0.0158
1.0100e-
0.0168
158.5493
158.5493
9.6700e-
158.7524
003
003
003
003
3.3 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 6.0991 i 69.5920 i 46.8050 0.0617 i 3.3172 i 3.3172 i 3.0518 3.0518 i 6,313.369 i 6,313.369 i 1.9344 i 6,353.991
0 i 0 5
Total
6.0991
69.5920
46.8050
0.0617
8.6733
3.3172
11.9905
3.5965
3.0518
6.6483
6,313.369
6,313.369
1.9344
6,353.991
0
0
5
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.3 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0946 i 0.1017 1.1586 1.9500e- i 0.1673 i 1.0600e- i 0.1684 0.0444 i 9.8000e- 0.0454 + i 152.0786 152.0786 i 8.9500e- i i 152.2666
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0946
0.1017
1.1586
1.9500e-
0.1673
1.0600e-
0.1684
0.0444
9.8000e-
0.0454
152.0786
152.0786
8.9500e-
152.2666
003
003
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 3.2135 0.0000 3.2135 i 1.3325 0.0000 1.3325 i 0.0000 0.0000
- --i-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------- --+ - i-------'-------'-------'-------+ ------
Off -Road •� 1.5128 i 29.7798 i 37.9432 0.0617 i 1.3234 1.3234 i 1.3234 1.3234 0.0000 i 6,313.369 i 6,313.369 i 1.9344 i 6,353.991
0 i 0 i i i 5
Total
1.5128
29.7798
37.9432
0.0617
3.2135
1.3234
4.5369
1.3325
1.3234
2.6559
0.0000
6,313.369
6,313.369
1.9344
6,353.991
11
0
0
5
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.3 Grading - 2017
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0946 i 0.1017 1.1586 1.9500e- i 0.0510 i 1.0600e- i 0.0521 0.0158 i 9.8000e- 0.0168 + i 152.0786 152.0786 i 8.9500e- i i 152.2666
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0946
0.1017
1.1586
1.9500e-
0.0510
1.0600e-
0.0521
0.0158
9.8000e-
0.0168
152.0786
152.0786
8.9500e-
152.2666
003
003
004
003
3.3 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 5.2895 i 59.5338 i 42.3068 0.0617 i 2.7880 2.7880 i 2.5650 2.5650 i 6,212.804 i 6,212.804 i 1.9341 i : 6,253.420
2 i 2 i i i 9
Total
5.2895
59.5338
42.3068
0.0617
8.6733
2.7880
11.4614
3.5965
2.5650
6.1615
6,212.804
6,212.804
1.9341
6,253.420
2
2
9
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.3 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0855 i 0.0933 1.0530 1.9500e- i 0.1673 i 1.0500e- i 0.1684 0.0444 i 9.7000e- 0.0454 + i 146.2174 146.2174 i 8.3500e- i i 146.3928
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0855
0.0933
1.0530
1.9500e-
0.1673
1.0500e-
0.1684
0.0444
9.7000e-
0.0454
146.2174
146.2174
8.3500e-
146.3928
003
003
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 3.2135 0.0000 3.2135 i 1.3325 0.0000 1.3325 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road •1 1.5128 i 29.7798 i 37.9432 0.0617 i 1.3234 1.3234 i 1.3234 1.3234 0.0000 i 6,212.804 i 6,212.804 i 1.9341 i 6,253.420
Total
1.5128
29.7798
37.9432
0.0617
3.2135
1.3234
4.5369
1.3325
1.3234
2.6559
0.0000
6,212.804
6,212.804
1.9341
6,253.420
11
1
1
9
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.3 Grading - 2018
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0855 i 0.0933 1.0530 1.9500e- i 0.0510 i 1.0500e- i 0.0520 0.0158 i 9.7000e- 0.0168 + i 146.2174 146.2174 i 8.3500e- i i 146.3928
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0855
0.0933
1.0530
1.9500e-
0.0510
1.0500e-
0.0520
0.0158
9.7000e-
0.0168
146.2174
146.2174
8.3500e-
146.3928
003
003
004
003
3.3 Grading - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •i 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 4.8912 i 54.1978 i 40.2888 0.0617 i 2.5049 2.5049 i 2.3045 2.3045 i 6,111.312 i 6,111.312 1.9336 i 6,151.916
•�
i i i i i i i i , 1 i 1 i i i 7
Total
4.8912
54.1978
40.2888
0.0617
8.6733
2.5049
11.1783
3.5965
2.3045
5.9010
6,111.312
6,111.312
1.9336
6,151.916
1
1
7
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.3 Grading - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0785 i 0.0862 0.9735 1.9500e- i 0.1673 i 1.0500e- i 0.1684 0.0444 i 9.7000e- 0.0454 + i 140.7383 140.7383 i 7.8900e- i i 140.9040
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0785
0.0862
0.9735
1.9500e-
0.1673
1.0500e-
0.1684
0.0444
9.7000e-
0.0454
140.7383
140.7383
7.8900e-
140.9040
003
003
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 3.2135 0.0000 3.2135 i 1.3325 0.0000 1.3325 i 0.0000 0.0000
-•-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------- -- --------'-------'-------'-------
Off -Road •� 1.5128 i 29.7798 i 37.9432 0.0617 i 1.3234 1.3234 i 1.3234 1.3234 0.0000 i 6,111.312 i 6,111.312 1.9336 i 6,151.916
•�
i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 7
Total
1.5128
29.7798
37.9432
0.0617
3.2135
1.3234
4.5369
1.3325
1.3234
2.6559
0.0000
6,111.312
6,111.312
1.9336
6,151.916
11
1
1
7
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.3 Grading - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0785 i 0.0862 0.9735 1.9500e- i 0.0510 i 1.0500e- i 0.0520 0.0158 i 9.7000e- 0.0168 + i 140.7383 140.7383 i 7.8900e- i i 140.9040
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0785
0.0862
0.9735
1.9500e-
0.0510
1.0500e-
0.0520
0.0158
9.7000e-
0.0168
140.7383
140.7383
7.8900e-
140.9040
003
003
004
003
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 2.3516 i 20.9650 i 17.1204 0.0268 i 1.2850 1.2850 i 1.2083 1.2083 i 2,580.761 i 2,580.761 i 0.6279 i : 2,593.947
8 i 8 i i i 9
Total
2.3516
20.9650
17.1204
0.0268
1.2850
1.2850
1.2083
1.2083
2,580.761
2,580.761
0.6279
2,593.947
8
8
9
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.3856 i 9.6499 18.8262 i 0.0303 i 0.9025 i 0.2075 i 1.1101 0.2559 i 0.1909 0.4467 i 2,889.997 : 2,889.997 i 0.0184 2,890.383
7 1 7 1 i i 2
;� I 1
-----------•-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+--------------'-------'-------'-------+-------
Worker •i 2.2881 i 2.5130 28.3782 0.0568 i 4.8778 i 0.0305 i 4.9083 1.2938 i 0.0283 1.3221 + i 4,102.520 4,102.520 i 0.2301 4,107.351
2 i 2 i i i 8
Total
3.6737
12.1629
47.2045
0.0871
5.7803
0.2380
6.0184
1.5497
0.2191
1.7688
6,992.517
6,992.517
0.2484
6,997.735
9
9
0
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,580.761 i 2,580.761 i 0.6279 2,593.947
8 i 8 i i i 9
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,580.761
2,580.761
0.6279
2,593.947
8
8
9
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.3856 i 9.6499 18.8262 i 0.0303 i 0.3714 i 0.2075 i 0.5789 0.1255 i 0.1909 0.3164 2,889.997 2,889.997 i 0.0184 2,890.383
7 i 7 i i i 2
Worker •i 2.2881 i 2.5130 28.3782 0.0568 i 1.4863 i 0.0305 i 1.5168 0.4614 i 0.0283 0.4896 + i 4,102.520 4,102.520 i 0.2301 4,107.351
2 i 2 i i i 8
Total
3.6737
12.1629
47.2045
0.0871
1.8577
0.2380
2.0957
0.5868
0.2191
0.8060
6,992.517
6,992.517
0.2484
6,997.735
9
9
0
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 2.1113 i 19.0839 i 16.8084 0.0268 i 1.1128 1.1128 i 1.0465 1.0465 i 2,542.479 i 2,542.479 0.6194 i : 2,555.488
9 i 9 0
Total
2.1113
19.0839
16.8084
0.0268
1.1128
1.1128
1.0465
1.0465
2,542.479
2,542.479
0.6194
2,555.488
9
9
0
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.1827 i 8.2247 16.9949 i 0.0303 i 0.9021 i 0.1866 i 1.0887 0.2557 i 0.1716 0.4273 2,821.450 2,821.450 i 0.0176 i 1 2,821.820
5 i 5 i i i 9
Worker •i 2.1283 i 2.3539 i 26.5147 0.0568 i 4.8778 i 0.0306 i 4.9084 1.2938 i 0.0284 1.3222 + i 3,936.184 3,936.184 i 0.2193 i i 3,940.788
5 i 5 i i i 8
Total
3.3110
10.5787
43.5096
0.0870
5.7799
0.2172
5.9971
1.5495
0.2000
1.7495
6,757.635
6,757.635
0.2369
6,762.609
0
0
7
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,542.479 i 2,542.479 0.6194 2,555.488
9 i 9 0
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,542.479
2,542.479
0.6194
2,555.488
9
9
0
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.1827 i 8.2247 16.9949 i 0.0303 i 0.3709 i 0.1866 i 0.5575 0.1253 i 0.1716 0.2970 2,821.450 2,821.450 i 0.0176 2,821.820
5 i 5 i i i 9
•i 2.1283 i i . Worker 2.3539 26 5147 0.0568 i 1.4863 i 0.0306 i 1.5169 0.4614 i 0.0284 0.4897 + i 3,936.184 3,936.184 i 0.2193 i i 3,940.788
5 i 5 i i i 8
Total
3.3110
10.5787
43.5096
0.0870
1.8572
0.2172
2.0744
0.5867
0.2000
0.7867
6,757.635
6,757.635
0.2369
6,762.609
0
0
7
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
Ib/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.8931 i 17.3403 i 16.5376 0.0268 0.9549 0.9549 0.8979 0.8979 i 2,542.781 i 2,542.781 i 0.6126 2,555.646
7 i 7 i i i 2
Total
1.8931
17.3403
16.5376
0.0268
0.9549
0.9549
0.8979
0.8979
2,542.781
2,542.781
0.6126
2,555.646
7
7
2
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
+-------r------'------- '------- '------- +--- ----
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
Vendor •i 1.0982 i 6.7966 � 16.1388 i 0.0302 i 0.9020 i 0.1625 i 1.0644 � 0.2556 i 0.1495 0.4051 � i 2,817.567 2,817.567 i 0.0178 2,817.941
9 i 9 i i i 2
Worker •i 2.0095 i 2.2331 25.2338 0.0568 i 4.8778 i 0.0310 i 4.9088 1.2938 i 0.0287 1.3225 + i 3,878.043 3,878.043 i 0.2131 i i 3,882.517
4 i 4 i i i 6
Total
3.1077
9.0297
41.3726
0.0870
5.7798
0.1934
5.9732
1.5494
0.1782
1.7276
6,695.611
6,695.611
0.2308
6,700.458
3
3
8
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,542.781 i 2,542.781 i 0.6126 2,555.646
7 i 7 i i i 2
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,542.781
2,542.781
0.6126
2,555.646
7
7
2
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
+-------r------'------- '------- '------- +--- ----
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
Vendor •i 1.0982 i 6.7966 � 16.1388 i 0.0302 i 0.3708 i 0.1625 i 0.5333 � 0.1253 i 0.1495 0.2747 � i 2,817.567 2,817.567 i 0.0178 2,817.941
9 i 9 i i i 2
Worker •i 2.0095 i 2.2331 25.2338 0.0568 i 1.4863 i 0.0310 i 1.5173 0.4614 i 0.0287 0.4901 + i 3,878.043 3,878.043 i 0.2131 i i 3,882.517
4 i 4 i i i 6
Total
3.1077
9.0297
41.3726
0.0870
1.8571
0.1934
2.0505
0.5866
0.1782
0.7648
6,695.611
6,695.611
0.2308
6,700.458
3
3
8
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.6992 i 15.5364 i 16.3276 0.0268 0.8057 0.8057 0.7581 0.7581 2,543.749 i 2,543.749 i 0.6085 2,556.528
7 i 7 i i i 6
Total
1.6992
15.5364
16.3276
0.0268
0.8057
0.8057
0.7581
0.7581
2,543.749
2,543.749
0.6085
2,556.528
7
7
6
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 28 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.0665 i 6.1183 15.8518 i 0.0302 i 0.9018 i 0.1599 i 1.0617 0.2556 i 0.1471 0.4027 2,813.991 2,813.991 i 0.0181 2,814.371
0 i 0 i i i 1
Worker •i 1.9099 i 2.1430 24.0159 0.0568 i 4.8778 i 0.0311 i 4.9089 1.2938 i 0.0288 1.3226 + i 3,820.998 3,820.998 i 0.2071 i i 3,825.347
6 i 6 i i i 2
Total
2.9763
8.2614
39.8677
0.0870
5.7796
0.1910
5.9705
1.5494
0.1759
0.2252
6,639.718
[7776,634.989
6
17634.989
6
3
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,543.749 i 2,543.749 i 0.6085 2,556.528
7 i 7 i i i 6
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,543.749
2,543.749
0.6085
2,556.528
7
7
6
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 29 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.0665 i 6.1183 15.8518 i 0.0302 i 0.3706 i 0.1599 i 0.5305 0.1252 i 0.1471 0.2723 2,813.991 2,813.991 i 0.0181 2,814.371
0 i 0 i i i 1
Worker •i 1.9099 i 2.1430 24.0159 0.0568 i 1.4863 i 0.0311 i 1.5174 0.4614 i 0.0288 0.4902 + i 3,820.998 3,820.998 i 0.2071 i i 3,825.347
6 i 6 i i i 2
Total
2.9763
8.2614
39.8677
0.0870
1.8569
0.1910
2.0479
0.5865
0.1759
0.2252
6,639.718
[7776,634.989
6
17634.989
6
3
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.5661 i 14.3126 i 16.2093 0.0268 i 0.6967 0.6967 i 0.6557 0.6557 i 2,544.626 i 2,544.626 i 0.6044 i : 2,557.319
2 i 2 i i i 1
Total
1.5661
14.3126
16.2093
0.0268
0.6967
0.6967
0.6557
0.6557
2,544.626
2,544.626
0.6044
2,557.319
2
2
1
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 30 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.9966 i 5.4076 15.2646 i 0.0301 i 0.9016 i 0.1535 i 1.0551 0.2555 i 0.1412 0.3967 2,806.986 i 2,806.986 i 0.0170 2,807.343
6 i 6 i i i 8
Worker •i 1.8219 i 2.0678 22.9326 0.0568 i 4.8778 i 0.0312 i 4.9090 1.2938 i 0.0290 1.3228 + i 3,770.326 3,770.326 i 0.2020 i i 3,774.568
4 i 4 i i i 1
Total
2.8184
7.4754
38.1972
0.0869
5.7794
0.1847
5.9641
1.5493
0.1702
0.2190
6,581.911
[7776,577.313
0
17577.3113
0
9
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,544.626 i 2,544.626 i 0.6044 2,557.319
2 i 2 i i i 1
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,544.626
2,544.626
0.6044
2,557.319
2
2
1
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 31 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.9966 i 5.4076 15.2646 i 0.0301 i 0.3704 i 0.1535 i 0.5239 0.1251 i 0.1412 0.2663 2,806.986 i 2,806.986 i 0.0170 2,807.343
6 i 6 i i i 8
Worker •i 1.8219 i 2.0678 22.9326 0.0568 i 1.4863 i 0.0312 i 1.5175 0.4614 i 0.0290 0.4903 + i 3,770.326 3,770.326 i 0.2020 i i 3,774.568
4 i 4 i i i 1
Total
2.8184
7.4754
38.1972
0.0869
1.8567
0.1847
2.0415
0.5865
0.1702
0.2190
6,581.911
[7776,577.313
0
17577.3113
0
9
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.2664 i 1.8354 i 1.8413 2.9700e- i 0.1288 0.1288 i 0.1288 0.1288 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0238 i 281.9473
003
Total
67.8324
1.8354
1.8413
2.9700e-
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 32 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.4592 i 0.5043 5.6951 0.0114 i 0.9789 i 6.1200e- i 0.9850 0.2597 i 5.6700e- 0.2653 + i 823.3188 823.3188 i 0.0462 i i 824.2884
003 003
Total
0.4592
0.5043
5.6951
0.0114
0.9789
6.1200e-
0.9850
0.2597
5.6700e-
0.2653
823.3188
823.3188
0.0462
824.2884
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •� 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0238 i 281.9473
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 33 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.4592 i 0.5043 5.6951 0.0114 i 0.2983 i 6.1200e- i 0.3044 0.0926 i 5.6700e- 0.0983 + i 823.3188 823.3188 i 0.0462 i i 824.2884
003 003
Total
0.4592
0.5043
5.6951
0.0114
0.2983
6.1200e-
0.3044
0.0926
5.6700e-
0.0983
823.3188
823.3188
0.0462
824.2884
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- i 0.1109 0.1109 i 0.1109 0.1109 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0218 i 281.9057
003
Total
67.8081
1.6838
1.8314
2.9700e-
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 34 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.4271 i 0.4724 5.3211 0.0114 i 0.9789 i 6.1400e- i 0.9850 0.2597 i 5.6900e- 0.2653 + i 789.9375 789.9375 i 0.0440 790.8616
003 003
Total
0.4271
0.4724
5.3211
0.0114
0.9789
6.1400e-
0.9850
0.2597
5.6900e-
0.2653
789.9375
789.9375
0.0440
790.8616
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •i 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0218 i 281.9057
003
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 35 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.4271 i 0.4724 5.3211 0.0114 i 0.2983 i 6.1400e- i 0.3044 0.0926 i 5.6900e- 0.0983 + i 789.9375 789.9375 i 0.0440 790.8616
003 003
Total
0.4271
0.4724
5.3211
0.0114
0.2983
6.1400e-
0.3044
0.0926
5.6900e-
0.0983
789.9375
789.9375
0.0440
790.8616
j
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 2.9700e- i 0.0941 0.0941 i 0.0941 0.0941 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0193 i 281.8537
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.7848
1.5268
1.8176
2.9700e-
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 36 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.4033 i 0.4482 5.0641 0.0114 i 0.9789 i 6.2100e- i 0.9851 0.2597 i 5.7600e- 0.2654 + i 778.2694 778.2694 i 0.0428 779.1673
003 003
Total
0.4033
0.4482
5.0641
0.0114
0.9789
6.2100e-
0.9851
0.2597
5.7600e-
0.2654
778.2694
778.2694
0.0428
779.1673
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
Ib/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •i 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0193 i 281.8537
003
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 37 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.4033 i 0.4482 5.0641 0.0114 i 0.2983 i 6.2100e- i 0.3045 0.0926 i 5.7600e- 0.0984 + i 778.2694 778.2694 i 0.0428 779.1673
003 003
Total
0.4033
0.4482
5.0641
0.0114
0.2983
6.2100e-
0.3045
0.0926
5.7600e-
0.0984
778.2694
778.2694
0.0428
779.1673
j
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.2045 i 1.4085 i 1.8136 2.9700e- i 0.0817 0.0817 i 0.0817 0.0817 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0183 i 281.8329
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.7705
1.4085
1.8136
2.9700e-
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 38 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
I I I I I I I I I I I
Hauling •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 � 0.0000 + I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000
- ---,•I -------'I -------'I ------- '1 -------'I ------- '1 ------- '1 -------'II ------- '1I ---------------,+------1---- '1 ------- '1 -------'II ------- -------
0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I
,1 , 1
I I I I I I I I I I I
Worker •I 0.3833 I 0.4301 I 4.8197 I 0.0114 I 0.9789 16.2400e- I 0.9851 I 0.2597 15.7900e- � 0.2654 + I 766.8213 1766.8213 I 0.0416 I � 767.6940
003 1 I 1 003
Total
0.3833
0.4301
4.8197
0.0114
0.9789
6.2400e-
0.9851
0.2597
5.7900e-
0.2654
766.8213
766.8213
0.0416
767.6940
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I
Off -Road •1 0.0594 1 1.3570 1 1.8324 1 2.9700e- 1 1 0.0951 1 0.0951 1 1 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 1 281.4481 1 281.4481 1 0.0183 281.8329
003 I I I I I 1 I I I
1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 1 0.0000 1 1 � 0.0000
'1
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 39 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.3833 i 0.4301 4.8197 0.0114 i 0.2983 i 6.2400e- i 0.3045 0.0926 i 5.7900e- 0.0984 + i 766.8213 766.8213 i 0.0416 767.6940
003 003
Total
0.3833
0.4301
4.8197
0.0114
0.2983
6.2400e-
0.3045
0.0926
5.7900e-
0.0984
766.8213
766.8213
0.0416
767.6940
003
003
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
Ib/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •i 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.1917 i 1.3030 i 1.8111 2.9700e- i 0.0708 0.0708 i 0.0708 0.0708 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0168 i 281.8017
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.7576
1.3030
1.8111
2.9700e-
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 40 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.3656 i 0.4150 4.6023 0.0114 i 0.9789 i 6.2600e- i 0.9852 0.2597 i 5.8100e- 0.2655 + i 756.6521 756.6521 i 0.0405 i i 757.5034
003 003
Total
0.3656
0.4150
4.6023
0.0114
0.9789
6.2600e-
0.9852
0.2597
5.8100e-
0.2655
756.6521
756.6521
0.0405
757.5034
j
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0168 i 281.8017
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 41 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
-----------•-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+------ r------'-------'-------'-------+------
Worker •i 0.3656 i 0.4150 4.6023 0.0114 i 0.2983 i 6.2600e- i 0.3046 0.0926 i 5.8100e- 0.0984 + i 756.6521 756.6521 i 0.0405 i i 757.5034
003 003
Total
0.3656
0.4150
4.6023
0.0114
0.2983
6.2600e-
0.3046
0.0926
5.8100e-
756.6521
0.0405
757.5034
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
[777756.6521
j
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.0128 i 9.9983 i 14.2850 0.0223 0.5010 0.5010 0.4609 0.4609 2,160.613 i 2,160.613 i 0.6988 2,175.288
9 i 9 i i i 4
Paving 2.2544 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000
Total
3.2672
9.9983
14.2850
0.0223
0.5010
0.5010
0.4609
0.4609
2,160.613
2,160.613
0.6988
2,175.288
11
9
9
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 42 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0469 i 0.0532 0.5900 1.4600e- i 0.1255 i 8.000Oe- i 0.1263 0.0333 i 7.5000e- 0.0340 + i 97.0067 97.0067 i 5.2000e- i i 97.1158
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0469
0.0532
0.5900
1.4600e-
0.1255
8.000Oe-
0.1263
0.0333
7.5000e-
0.0340
97.0067
97.0067
5.2000e-
97.1158
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.5490 i 11.0645 i 16.9276 0.0223 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982 0.0000 i 2,160.613 i 2,160.613 i 0.6988 2,175.288
9 i 9 i i i 4
Paving •1 2,2544 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000
Total
2.8034
11.0645
16.9276
0.0223
0.5982
0.5982
0.5982
0.5982
0.0000
2,160.613
2,160.613
0.6988
2,175.288
11
9
9
4
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 43 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
3.6 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000
1
Worker •i 0.0469 i 0.0532 0.5900 1.4600e- i 0.0382 i 8.00OOe- i 0.0390 0.0119 i 7.5000e- 0.0126 + i 97.0067 97.0067 i 5.2000e- i i 97.1158
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0469
0.0532
0.5900
1.4600e-
0.0382
8.00OOe-
0.0390
0.0119
7.5000e-
0.0126
97.0067
97.0067
5.2000e-
97.1158
003
004
004
003
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Density
Increase Diversity
Improve Walkability Design
Improve Destination Accessibility
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 44 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
ROG
I NOx I
CO
I S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated •, 35.1441 i 51.9167 273.0431
0.3814 i 23.5980 i 0.7891
24.3871
i 6.2997
i 0.7270
7.0268
29,510.15 29,510.15 1.2226
i i 29,535.83
Unmitigated
•• 38.2888 73.8235 354.8991
0.6377 41.0810 1.2988
42.3799
10.9670
1.1965
12.1635
49,384.89 49,384.89 • 1.9000
49,424.79
76 76
84
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise ; 988.50 1,074.00 910.50 2,213,593 1,271,545
. . .. . . .. . . . . .A - - - - - - - -f - - - - - - - - - - -
• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. - - - - - - - - - __________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Apartments Mid Rise 527.20 , 572.80 485.60 1.180.583 678,157
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
City Park + 55.65 ; 55.65 55.65 106,102 60,948
......................................-----------------------T-------------------------------- --------------------------
Strip Mall + 1,551.20 ; 1,471.40 715.05 1,658,658 952,776
.................................................. ---------- ---------- ---------------------- -----------------------
General Office Building + 110.10 ; 23.70 9.80 178,048 102,275
................................................... ---------- - ----------- ---------------------- -----------------------
T Y
General Office Building ; 781.71 168.27 69.58 1,264,143 726,156
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .----------T . . .. - - - - - - - ---------------------------------------------------
Y
General Office Building ; 55.05 11.85 4.90 89,024 51,138
A------------
..................................... ---------- ----------- ----------------------------------------------------
Golf Coup se , 782.79 790.86 1.144.481 657,419
:
.............. _ _ _-677.88
............... --------------T --Y - -
Golf Course ; 75.60 ; 87.30 88.20 127,637 73,318
......................................-----------
;-----------T-----------Y---------------------------------------------------
Hotel + 1,143.80 , 1,146.60 833.00 1,633,249 938,180
.................................................. ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r
Hotel ; 1,634.00 ; 1,638.00 1190.00 2,333,213 1,340,257
. .
.................................................. ---------- ---------- ---------------------- -----------------------
T y
Other Asphalt Surfaces + 0.00 0.00 0.00
.................................................. -----------------------------------------------.-------------------------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 0.00 0.00
...................... ...... ...... ....________-__ __----------- ------------------------ --------------------------
Quality Restaurant ; 449.75 471.80 360.80 376,413 216,221
�_
.................................................. ------------------------------------------- -------------------------
Single Family Housing + 2,440.35 ; 2,570.40 2236.35 5,435,239 3,122,141
Total 10,490.79
10,074.56
7,750.29
17,740,383
10,190,532
4.3 Trip Type Information
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 45 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
1
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
7-Miles
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H O or C-NW
H-W or C-W H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
=ed
Pass -by
Apartments Mid Rise ; 11.00
3.50
4.50
40.20
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
........................--------------------
.......... r - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
-- - - ------ - -
Apartments Mid Rise 11.00
3.50
4.50 v
40.20
;-
19.20
, 40.60
86
11
3
....................... .----------- ----------
City Park ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
-----------------
33.00
1 48.00
I ----------------------------------------------------
19.00
66
28
6
.......................---------------------
------
Strip Mall 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
16.60
1 64.40
19.00
45
40
15
......... ...............-------------------
General Office Building ; 12.50 4.20
r--------�
5.40
33.00
I 48.00
---�
19.00
---------
77
---------- -----------------
19
4
...............---12.5-------------
General Office Building 12.50
4.20
5.40
33.00
48.00
1900.
77
19
4
......... ...............-------------------
General Office Building ; 12.50 4.20 T
---;r-
5.40
-------�
33.00
--------�
48.00
----------------------
T 19.00
77
---------- -----------------
19
4
Golf Course 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
33.00
48.00
19.00
52
39
9
........................-------------------- T
Golf Course 12.50 4.20
....... :
----------�
5.40
33.00
........
48.00
T ...........: ..
19.00
--------
52
-------- -----------------
39
9
........................--------------------
-r--------�
--------------
Hotel 12.50
4.20
5.40 r
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
....................... .----------- ----------
Hotel ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
--------
19.40
1 61.60
19.00
58
------ -----------------
38
4
........................--------------------
--- ---------
-----------------
Other Asphalt Surfaces 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
........................----------- ----------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
-------
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
-----------------
0
0
........................--------------------
_
T
--------------
Quality Restaurant 12.50
4.20
5.40 i
12.00
69.00
19.00
38
18
44
....................... r----------rt---------T----------,F
Single Family Housing 11.00 3.50
4.50
------------------ r--------t-----------
40.20 19.20 40.60
---------
86
-------- -----------------
11
3
LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
0.471073• 0.065210, 0.167869, 0.157103, 0.039378, 0.006346, 0.011728, 0.072116, 0.001386, 0.001196, 0.003702, 0.000530, 0.002362
§.g FenffggPetaiI
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Exceed Title 24
Install High Efficiency Lighting
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 46 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
ROG
NOx I
CO
I S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas •i
0.8814 7.8522 5.5544 0.0481 0.6090
0.6090
0.6090
0.6090
` i 9,615.145 9,615.145 0.1843
i 0.1763 1 9,673.661
Mitigated
7 7
- - - - - - - - - - - —
------------ +--------------I--------------- --------------- +--------------#---------------+--------------I---------------}--------------- - - - - - - - + - - - - - - --------- ------ ------------- --4---------------4---------------+ - - - - - - -
NaturalGas
1.0132 9.0278 6.3936 0.0553 0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
• 11,053.17 11,053.17 • 0.2119
- 0.2026 11,120.44
Unmitigated
23 23
01
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 47 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
I
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Mid 2628.77 �i 0.0284 i 0.2423 0.1031 i 1.5500e- 0.0196 i 0.0196 0.0196 0.0196 309.2667 i 309.2667 i 5.9300e- 5.6700e- 311.1489
Rise 003 . 003 003 i
----------- ------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------� '-------'-------'------- �------ter i i i i i i i i r------i '* - - - - - - -
Apartments Mid 4928.94 -1 0.0532 i 0.4542 0.1933 i 2.9000e- i 0.0367 i 0.0367 i 0.0367 0.0367 i 579.8751 579.8751 i 0.0111 0.0106 583.4041
Rise 003
City Park � 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
---- - -- - ter - - --- -i i i i i i i i r---- - -i i i '*-------
General Office 100 :i 1.0800e- i 9.8000e- i 8.24OOe- i 6.000Oe- i 7.5000e- i 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- i 11.7647 11.7647 i 2.3000e- 2.2000e- 11.8363
Building i .� 003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . i004 004
General Office 50 q 5.4000e- i 4.9000e- i 4.1200e- i 3.000Oe- 3.7000e- i 3.7000e- � i 3.7000e- 3.7000e- 5.8824 i 5.8824 i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- i 5.9182
Building i .: 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 i 004
i � � i � i i � �
-�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i *-------
--------- ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+---- -� '-------'-------'-------
General Office 710 q 7.6600e- i 0.0696 i 0.0585 4.2000e- i 5.2900e- i 5.2900e- 5.29OOe- 5.2900e- i 83.5294 83.5294 i 1.6000e- i 1.5300e- 84.0378
Building i .: 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 003 003 i
- ---- ---------�i-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------i-------'-----------------------t-------
Golf Course � 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
- ------ ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------� '-------'-------'------- -�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
Hotel 28675.5 -i 0.3093 i 2.8113 i 2.3615 i 0.0169 i 0.2137 i 0.2137 i 0.2137 0.2137 + i 3,373.589 3,373.589 i 0.0647 i 0.0619 3,394.120
0 i 0 i 1
- ---- - ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------------------'-------'-------'-------
Hotel 29244.2 q 0.3154 i 2.8671 i 2.4084 i 0.0172 i 0.2179 i 0.2179 i 0.2179 0.2179 i 3,440.493 i 3,440.493 i 0.0659 0.0631 i 3,461.431
2 i 2 i i i 4
---------- ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------'-------'-------'-------
Other Asphalt 0 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
�1
Surfaces
- ------ ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------------------'-------'-------'-------
Quality 3801.51 -i 0.0410 i 0.3727 i 0.3131 i 2.24OOe- i 0.0283 i 0.0283 i 0.0283 0.0283 i 447.2361 i 447.2361 i 8.57OOe- 8.2000e- i 449.9579
Restaurant i .I 003 . 003 003 i
Single Family 23590.E .i 0.2544 i 2.1740 i 0.9251 i 0.0139 i 0.1758 i 0.1758 i i 0.1758 0.1758 i 2,775.363 2,775.363 i 0.0532 i 0.0509 : 2,792.253
Housing 3 3 i 7
Strip Mall 222.466 �i 2.4000e- i 0.0218 i 0.0183 i 1.3000e- i 1.6600e- i 1.6600e- i i 1.6600e- 1.6600e- T 26.1724 i 26.1724 i 5.000Oe- 4.8000e- i 26.3317
003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 004 004 i
Total
1.0132
9.0278
6.3936
0.0553
0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
11,053.17
11753.17
0.2118
0.2027
11,120.44
23
23
01
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 48 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
I
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Mid 2.29294 �i 0.0247 i 0.2113 i 0.0899 i 1.3500e- 0.0171 i 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 269.7582 i 269.7582 i 5.1700e- 4.9500e- 271.3999
Rise 003 . 003 003 i
----------- -------r ------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------� r------'-------'------- '------- tei i i i i i i i i i i '*-------
Apartments Mid 4.29927 -1 0.0464 i 0.3962 i 0.1686 i 2.5300e- i 0.0320 i 0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 i 505.7965 505.7965 i 9.6900e- i 9.2700e- 508.8747
Rise 003 . 003 003 i
City Park � 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
---------- ;I'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'--------------- +---- -'-------'------- '------- -�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
General Office 0.0425 �i 4.6000e- i 4.1700e- i 3.5000e- i 3.000Oe- i 3.2000e- i 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- i 5.0000 5.0000 i 1.0000e- i 9.000Oe- 5.0304
Building i .� 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . i004 005
General Office i 0.085 -i 9.2000e- i 8.3300e- 7.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- i i 6.3000e- i 6.3000e- i 6.3000e- 6.3000e- i 10.0000 1 10.0000 i 1.9000e- i 1.8000e- 10.0609
Building i .: 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004
� i 004 i 004
i � � i � i i � .
---------- ;I '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '--------------- +-------'-------'-------'-------
General Office 0.6035 �i 6.51OOe- i 0.0592 i 0.0497 i 3.5000e- i 4.5000e- i 4.5000e- i 4.5000e- 4.5000e- i 71.0000 i 71.0000 i 1.3600e- i 1.3000e- 71.4321
Building i .� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 003 003 i
- ---- --- I--------i------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------------- i------- ' -------- -------- ------- t-------
Golf Course � 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
---- - -- - ter - - --- -i i i i i i r---- - -i i i '*-------
Hotel 24.7065 -1 0.2664 i 2.4222 i 2.0347 i 0.0145 i 0.1841 i 0.1841 0.1841 0.1841 + i 2,906.650 2,906.650 i 0.0557 i 0.0533 2,924.339
0 i 0 i 4
Hotel 25.1965 -1 0.2717 i 2.4702 2.0750 i 0.0148 i 0.1877 i 0.1877 i 0.1877 0.1877 i 2,964.293 i 2,964.293 i 0.0568 0.0544 2,982.334
9 i 9 i 1
- -------- ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+------'-------'-------'-------
Other Asphalt 0 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
.i
Surfaces
-------- I •''------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------------- ' '------- '------- '-------
Quality 3.63355 -1 0.0392 0.3562 0.2992 i 2.14OOe- i 0.0271 i 0.0271 i 0.0271 0.0271 i 427.4762 i 427.4762 i 8.1900e- 7.8400e- i 430.0778
Restaurant 003 . 003 003 i
--------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
Single Family 20.6755 �i 0.2230 i 1.9054 i 0.8108 i 0.0122 i 0.1541 i 0.1541 i i 0.1541 0.1541 + i 2,432.416 2,432.416 i 0.0466 i 0.0446 2,447.220
Housing 7 7 i 0
-------- ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i t-------
Strip Mall 0.193411 �i 2.09OOe- 0.0190 i 0.0159 i 1.1000e- i 1.4400e- i 1.4400e- i i 1.4400e- 1.4400e- i 22.7542 i 22.7542 i 4.4000e- 4.2000e- i 22.8927
003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 004 004 i
Total
0.8814
7.8522
5.5544
0.0481
0.6090
0.6090
0.6090
0.6090
9,615.145
9,615.145
0.1843
0.1763
7673.661
7
7
9
6.0 Area Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 49 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non -Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non -Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
ROG
NOx
CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
177Total
CO2
I CH4
N20
I CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated •i 29.5811 i 0.4650
i 40.2888 2.1200e-
i i 1.1287
i 1.1287
1.1191
1.1191
0.0000 i 14,403.37 i 14,403.37 i 0.3453 i 0.2627
i 14,492.07
003
i i
i
i i
�
, 57 57
67
i � i � i i
-------------i i i i
Unmitigated •• 48.4088 - 0,4650
40.2888 2.1200e-
1.1287
1.1287
1.1191
1.1191
0.0000 14,403.37 • 14,403.37 - 0.3453 • 0.2627
14,492.07
003
57 57
67
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 50 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural •i 21.2324 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000
Coating
i
Consumer •i 24.6335 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000
Products
Hearth •i 1.3137 i 6.000Oe- i 0.0717 i 0.0000 0.9076 i 0.9076 i i 0.8981 0.8981 0.0000 i 14,331.17 i 14,331.17 i 0.2747 i 0.2627 i 14,418.39
005 . 65 65 i 36
Landscaping •i 1.2292 0.4650 i 40.2172 i 2.1200e- 0.2210 i 0.2210 i i 0.2210 0.2210 i 72.1992 i 72.1992 i 0.0707 i i 73.6831
003
Total
48.4088
0.4650
40.2888
2.1200e-
1.1287
1.1287
1.1191
1.1191
0.0000
14,403.37
14,403.37
0.3453
0.2627
14,492.07
003
57
57
67
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 51 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural •i 4.2465 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000
Coating
i i i i i
Consumer •i 22.7918 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000
Products
Hearth •i 1.3137 i 6.000Oe- i 0.0717 i 0.0000 0.9076 i 0.9076 i i 0.8981 0.8981 0.0000 i 14,331.17 i 14,331.17 i 0.2747 i 0.2627 i 14,418.39
005 . 65 65 i 36
Landscaping •i 1.2292 0.4650 i 40.2172 i 2.1200e- 0.2210 i 0.2210 i i 0.2210 0.2210 i 72.1992 i 72.1992 i 0.0707 i i 73.6831
003
Total
29.5811
0.4650
40.2888
2.1200e-
1.1287
1.1287
1.1191
1.1191
0.0000
14,403.37
14,403.37
0.3453
0.2627
14,492.07
003
57
57
67
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Apply Water Conservation Strategy
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 52 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:21 PM
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Vegetation
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
SilverRock Addendum
Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
10.00 i
1000sgft
; 0.23 10,000.00
0
--
General Office Building
_------------------------------
71.00 +
-----------------------------------
1000sgft ; 2.50 71,000.00 -+
-------
0
-----------------------------
General Office Building
------------------------------_
5.00 +
----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
1000sgft ; 0.11 5,000.00 - 1
- -- - - --
0
-----------------------------_
Other Asphalt Surfaces
------------------------------_
37.00 +
------------------ -- -- ----- -- -------------- - - - - ------- - - - - --
Acre ; 37.00 0.00 - 1
-- - - - --
0
------------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------------
User Defined Recreational
4.00 +
---- --------;-----------
User Defined Unit ; 4.00 0.00 - 1
--- - - --
0
-----------------------------_-
CityPark
-----------------------------_
35.00 +
-----------------------------------------------------i----- - - - - --
Acre ; 35.00 0.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Golf Course
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
134.50 +
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------- 1- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Acre ; 134.50 5,000.00 - 1
- - - - - - -
0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ _ . - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _-- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 1- - - - - - - - - - - -
- . _ _ _ _ _
Golf Course
15.00 +
Acre
; 15.00 0.00 1
0
------------------------------_
Hotel
-------------------------------
140.00
------------------------------ =--------------- -------- - - - - --
Room ; 17.00 166,400.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
+
-------------------------------
Hotel
------------------------------_
200.00
------------------------------=----------------- -------- - - - - --
Room ; 10.00 169,700.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
+
--- ---- - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_------------------------------
Quality Restaurant
5.00 +
---- -------- --------- -;-------------
1000sgft ; 0.11 5,000.00 - 1
- - - - - --
0
-----------------------------_-
-----------------------------_
----------------- --- -- ----- --------------- - - - - ---------- - - - - -- -+
- - - - --
artments Mid Rise
Apartments
150.00
+ Dwelling Unit
; 10.50 150,000.00
270
-----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------------
Apartments
artments Mid Rise
80.00 +
---- --------;-------------
Dwelling Unit ; 2.11 75,000.00 -+
-- - - --
144
--------- - --- - -- ----------_-
Single FamilyHousing
-----------------------------_
255.00 +
-----------------------------------------------------i-------- - - - - --
Dwelling Unit ; 56.50 459,000.00 -+
- - - - --
824
Strip Mall
35.00
1000sgft
25.50 35,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 3.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 20
Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
CO2Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - PA 1: 10,000 sf conference room, 15 acres modified existing golfcourse; PA 2: 140 hotel rooms; PA 3: 35 single family units; PA 4: 71,000 sf shared
services/conference center;
PA 5 200 hotel rooms; PA 6: 60 luxury branded units; PA 7: 25,000 sf retail, 150 apartment units;
PA 8: 160 units; PA 9: 15,000 sf retail, 80 apartment units; PA 10: 5,000 sf new clubhouse, 134.5 acre golf course
PA 11: 35 acre park; PA 12: 4 acres trails, 37 acres streets/landscaping
Construction Phase - Based on estimated construction schedule of 8 years
Trips and VMT - Per CalEEMod User's Guide for trip generation
On -road Fugitive Dust - Assume Paved Roads
Grading -
Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Trips - Water Well Sites and All American Canal
Road Dust - Paved Roads
Woodstoves - No woodstoves
Area Coating - No negative
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater -
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - Tier 3 required per CARB. SCAQMD Rule 403 and 403.1.
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 1113
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaMitigation•UseLowVOCPaintNonresidential ExteriorV- 250 50
alue
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
tblAreaMitigation
• UseLowVOCPai ntNon residential I nteriorV • 250
50
alue
----------------g------------
tblAreaMiti ation
+------------------------------f-------------------------------
• UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorValu 250 i
--------------------------
50
• -------e-------------
+
}-------------
t----------------
-------------
tblAreaMiti ation
g
• UseLowVOCPaintResidentiallnteriorValu
i 250 i
50
------------- --- ----- --- -----+-
e
- --------------------------
I
- ¢-----------------------------
--------------------------
tblConstDustMiti ation
Clean Paved Road PercentReduction
a 0
80
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ �
--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
°v 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
1.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------j�--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
a 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
T 0.00
3.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
------------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
T 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------$--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------+------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
°v 0.00
2.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
4.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
i 0.00
2.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
v 0.00
9.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----------------- -------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
1 0.00
1.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
- - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
} No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier
------------ ------ ------ ------ �
s No Change
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------------ ------ ------ ------ �
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------+------------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
-----------------------------
s No Change
--------------------------
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-} ----- ------ ------------------ -4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
i No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------_------------------------------j�------------------------------4--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
a No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------_------------------------------
------------------------------4
--------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
v No Change
Tier 3
-----------------------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
-----------------------------
Tier
-�------------------------------4--------------------------
? No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-{------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
} No Change
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 3
-------------
tblConstEquipMitigation
-
; Tier
----------------4--------------------------
v No Change ;
Tier 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblConstEquipMitigation
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------
4 No Change
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tier 3
_-----_tblConstructionPhase ----------------------
____________NumDays--_---__----�-----------------------------T--------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
; NumDays
6,200.00
1,161.00
-----------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
------------------------------
NumDa s
------------------------------4--------------------------
°v 440.00
43.00
____-_-tblConstructionPhase ______
_________PhaseEndDate__--_--------------------
------------T-___--___----
--------------------------
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseEndDate
i023
4
10/2/2023
10/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
4
4/18/2019
4/19/2019
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseEndDate
$ 2/21/2024
12/20/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
10/2/2023
8/1/2019
tblConstruction Phase
PhaseStartDate
4
- 4/20/2019
4/19/2019
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
12/2/2016
12/3/2016
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4
4 12/23/2023
10/23/2023
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWood Mass
4
i 457.60
0.00
-----------------------------
------------------------------
FireplaceWood Mass
------------------------------ 4
i 457.60
0.00
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
tblFire laces
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . . . _ - .. . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ .
NumberWood
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
s 25.50
_ _ _ _ . _ . _ . - . . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
Land UseS- uareFeet
_�----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -4
1,611,720.00
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
0.00
-----------------------------+-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Land UseSquareFeet
------------------------------4--------------------------
°v 174,240.00
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _.. _ _ _ . .. _ . . . .
Land UseS- uareFeet
_L----- ------------------------ t
fi 1,524,600.00
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
0.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
_-----------------------------}------------------------------4--------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
i 5,858,820.00
5,000.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
------------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
------------------------------4
v 653,400.00
--------------------------
0.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
203,280.00
166,400.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
290,400.00
169,700.00
tblLandUse
; Land UseSquareFeet
80,000.00
75,000.00
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
-----------------------------$------------------------------4------------
LotAcreag
4 1.63
-------------
2.50
e
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
LotAcrea
_L----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 4.67
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ .. _ _
17.00
e
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblLandUse
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . . . .
LotAcreage
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
6.67
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - - _ _ _
10.00
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
3.95
10.50
-----------------------------
tblLandUse
4------------------------------
LotAcreage
�----------------------------- 4--------------------------
v 82.79
56.50
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblLandUse
Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LotAcreage
- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 0.80
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.50
----------tblLandUse----------=-----------Population
------------------
-------------------------------4--------------------------
485.00
-----------------------------_----------------------------
tblLandUse
Population
-j�-----------------------------
i 258.00
--------------------------
144.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
------------------------------
Haul in PercentPave
-----------------------------
v 50.00
--------------------------
100.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
_------------9-----------------�--------------------------------------------------------
Haul in PercentPave
i 50.00
100.00
-----------------------------Y------------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
Haul in PercentPave
--------------------------------------------------------
i 50.00
100.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblOnRoadDust
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - . _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ . .
Haul in PercentPave
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
4 50.00
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _
100.00
-----------------------------Y------------g----------------
tblOnRoadDust
Haul in PercentPave
-$--------------------------------------------------------
50.00
100.00
-----------------------------+------------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
VendorPercentPave
--------------------------------------------------------
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
Vend orPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
VendorPercentPave
4
T 50.00
100.00
-----------------------------
tblOnRoadDust
_------------------------------
VendorPercentPave
g--------------------------------------------------------
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
Vend orPercentPave
4
50.00
100 00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
i 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblOnRoadDust
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. - _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _
WorkerPercentPave
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -
4 50.00
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ - _
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblOnRoadDust
WorkerPercentPave
4
4 50.00
100.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
4
a 2014
2020
-----------------------------_-----------------------------
tblRoadDust
RoadPercentPave
------------------------------
4 50
-------------- -----------
100
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
4
i 449.00
186.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblTripsAndVMT
Y _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . - .. - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . - _
WorkerTripNumber
_L----- ------ ------ ------ ------ t
ii4 1,262.00
_ . _ - . _ . _ . - _ . _ _ . _ . - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
583.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblTripsAndVMT
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ .
WorkerTripNumber
_L----------- ------ ------ ------ t
4 252.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
117.00
-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
+------------------y-----------�------------------------------4--------------------------
NumberCatal tic
i 11.50
0.00
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tblWoodstoves
Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
NumberCatal tic
_r------ ------ ------ ------ ------ t
i 12.75
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _
0.00
-----------------------------
Y-----------------------------
4-------------------------------____._____-_____-.____--__
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
11.50
0.00
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
12.75
0.00
-----------------------------
4------------------------------
----------------------------- 4--------------------------
tblWoodstoves
; Wood stove DayYear
82.00 ;
0.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - ------------------------------ t
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblWoodstoves
Wood stove Da Year
Y
°v 82.00
0.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - ----- ------------------------ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
+ 999.60
0.00
r
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2016 •i 6.5582 i 74.9377 50.1980 i 0.0635 18.2169 3.5853 i 21.1565 9.9706 i 3.2985 12.6751 0.0000 i 6,562.045 6,562.045 i 1.9447 0.0000 i 6,602.883
8 i 8 i i i 6
2017 •1 6.1698 i 69.7048 i 47.7609 i 0.0635 i 8.8407 i 3.3183 i 12.1589 i 3.6409 3.0528 6.6937 0.0000 1 6,454.407 i 6,454.407 i 1.9434 1 0.0000 i 6,495.218
g i g i i i 3
----------- ------------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ------- --------I ------- ------ -------------- -------
2018 •i 5.3532 i 59.6371 43.1739 0.0635 i 8.8407 i 2.7891 i 11.6297 i 3.6409 i 2.5660 6.2068 0.0000 1 6,348.389 i 6,348.389 i 1.9425 i 0.0000 6,389.181
3 i 3 i i i 5
2019 •i 73.7635 i 88.2171 i 106.1052 i 0.1730 i 14.6210 i 4.0317 i 18.6527 i 5.1906 i 3.7354 8.9259 0.0000 1 15,483.77 i 15,483.77 i 2.8188 1 0.0000 i 15,542.96
41
02 02 i �
----------------- j------- j------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i-------i--------------- ------ j-------j-------i------- i
2020 •i 73.1381 i 32.5485 67.7160 0.1229 i 6.7588 i 1.4493 i 8.2081 i 1.8091 1.3651 3.1742 0.0000 1 9,994.822 i 9,994.822 i 0.9231 i 0.0000 i 10,014.20
1 i 1 i 73
2021 •i 72.7040 i 28.9761 i 65.3157 i 0.1229 i 6.7587 i 1.2505 i 8.0091 i 1.8091 1.1776 2.9867 0.0000 i 9,926.552 i 9,926.552 i 0.9065 i 0.0000 i 9,945.589
5 i 5 i i i 4
2022 •i 72.3779 i 26.2172 63.4899 i 0.1229 6.7585 1.0864 i 7.8449 1.8090 i 1.0232 2.8322 0.0000 i 9,860.285 9,860.285 i 0.8946 0.0000 1 9,879.073
8 i 8 i i i 0
2023 •i 72.0823 i 24.0199 i 61.4578 i 0.1228 i 6.7583 i 0.9598 i 7.7181 1.8089 i 0.9037 2.7126 0.0000 i 9,797.449 i 9,797.449 i 0.8818 i 0.0000 1 9,815.968
8 i 8 i i i 2
Total
382.1469
404.2583
505.2173
0.8549
77.5534
18.4704
95.3781
29.6791
17.1222
46.2072
0.0000
74,427.72
74,427.72
12.2553
0.0000
74,685.08
35
35
53
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2016 •i 1.5916 i 29.9038 39.0038 i 0.0635 6.7394 i 1.3245 i 7.7015 i 3.6936 i 1.3244 4.6555 0.0000 i 6,562.045 i 6,562.045 i 1.9447 0.0000 i 6,602.883
'� i i i i i i i ■ 8 i 8 i i i 5
2017 •i 1.5835 � 29.8925 i 38.8991 i 0.0635 i 3.2645 i 1.3245 i 4.5889 i 1.3483 i 1.3244 � 2.6727 � 0.0000 i 6,454.407 i 6,454.407 i 1.9434 i 0.0000 � 6,495.218
'� i i i i i i i ■ g i g i 3
---------- •r------------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ------- ------------------------------ -------------- -------*-------
2018 •i 1.5765 i 29.8830 i 38.8103 i 0.0635 � 3.2645 i 1.3244 i 4.5889 i 1.3483 i 1.3244 � 2.6727 0.0000 i 6,348.389 i 6,348.389 i 1.9425 i 0.0000 i 6,389.181
'� i i i i i i i ■ 3 i 3 i i i 4
2019 •i 71.8760 � 57.0082 i 104.4548 i 0.1730 i 5.1221 i 2.4667 i 7.5888 i 1.9352 i 2.4475 � 4.3827 � 0.0000 i 15,483.77 i 15,483.77 i 2.8188 i 0.0000 i 15,542.96
�� ■ 1 02 02 i 41
2020 •i 71.5153 i 27.3118 i 68.7241 i 0.1229 � 2.1555 i 1.2222 i 3.3777 i 0.6793 i 1.2044 � 1.8836 � 0.0000 i 9,994.822 i 9,994.822 � 0.9231 i 0.0000 i 10,014.20
'� i i i i i i i ■ 1 i 1 i 73
2021 •i 71.3226 i 25.6402 i 66.6085 i 0.1229 � 2.1554 i 1.1982 i 3.3535 i 0.6792 i 1.1823 1.8615 � 0.0000 i 9,926.552 i 9,926.552 i 0.9065 i 0.0000 � 9,945.589
'� i i i i i i i ■ 5 i 5 i i i 4
---------- •r------------------------------------------------�-------�---------------+---- --r-------------�-------�-------*-------
2022 •i 71.2048 i 24.8034 64.9968 i 0.1229 2.1552 i 1.1957 i 3.3509 i 0.6791 i 1.1800 1.8591 0.0000 i 9,860.285 i 9,860.285 i 0.8946 0.0000 i 9,879.073
2023 •1 71.0552 23.9354 i 63.0854 i 0.1228 2.1550 i 1.1890 i 3.3440 i 0.6790 i 1.1739 1.8529 0.0000 i 9,797.449 i 9,797.449 i 0.8818 i 0.0000 i 9,815.968
'� i i i i i i i ■ 8 i 8 i i i 2
Total
361.7255
248.3783
484.5828
0.8549
27.0116
11.2450
37.8941
11.0420
11.1612
21.8407
0.0000
74,427.72
74,427.72
12.2553
0.0000
74,685.08
34
34
53
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
5.34
38.56
4.08
0.00
65.17
39.12
60.27
62.80
34.81
52.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reduction
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area •i 48.4088 i 0.4650 40.2888 i 2.1200e- 1.1287 i 1.1287 i i 1.1191 1.1191 0.0000 i 14,403.37 i 14,403.37 i 0.3453 0.2627 i 14,492.07
003 ■ 57 57 i 67
Energy •i 1.0132 i 9.0278 i 6.3936 i 0.0553 i i 0.7000 i 0.7000 i i 0.7000 0.7000 11,053.17 i 11,053.17 i 0.2119 i 0.2026 11,120.44
�� ■ 23 23 i 01
Mobile •1 31.6066 i 79.2896 370.0575 i 0.6047 41.0810 i 1.3075 i 42.3885 i 10.9670 i 1.2044 12.1714 46,994.66 i 46,994.66 i 1.9069 i i 47,034.71
Total
81.0285
88.7824
416.7399
0.6621
41.0810
3.1361
44.2172
10.9670
3.0235
13.9906
0.0000
72,451.21
72,451.21
2.4641
0.4654
72,647.22
11
57
57
93
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area •i 29.5811 i 0.4650 40.2888 i 2.1200e- 1.1287 i 1.1287 1.1191 1.1191 0.0000 i 14,403.37 14,403.37 i 0.3453 i 0.2627 i 14,492.07
003 . 57 57 i 67
Energy •i 0,8814 i 7.8522 5.5544 i 0.0481 0.6090 i 0.6090 i 0.6090 0.6090 i 9,615,145 9,615.145 i 0.1843 i 0.1763 1 9,673.661
7 i 7 i i i 9
Mobile •i 28.8422 i 55.1764 305.0550 i 0.3621 23.5980 0.7977 i 24.3957 6.2997 i 0.7350 7.0347 28,070.85 28,070.85 i 1.2295 28,096.67
Total
59.3047
63.4937
350.8982
0.4123
23.5980
2.5353
26.1333
6.2997
2.4630
52,089.38
52,089.38
1.7591
0.4390
[-777000
12
12
F2,262.41
72
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
26.81
28.48
15.80
37.73
42.56
19.16
40.90
42.56
18.54
37.37
0.00
28.10
28.10
28.61
5.66
28.06
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 -Site Preparation 'Site Preparation
! 1/1/2016
112/1/2016
5:
240:
i
i
2 •Grading +Grading
!12/3/2016
i4/19/2019
5
620:
i
i
3 •Building Construction +Building Construction
!4/19/2019
i 10/1/2023
5:
1161
i
i
4 •Architectural Coating !Architectural Coating
!8/1/2019
:12/22/2023
5
1147:
i
i
5 -Paving -Paving
:10/23/2023
-12/20/2023
5•
43,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1550
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 1,385,100; Residential Outdoor: 461,700; Non -Residential Indoor: 3,630,960; Non -Residential Outdoor: 1,210,320
(Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor
Site Preparation
+Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3; 8.00E
255'
0.40
---------------------------
Site Preparation
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 4; 8.00E
t--------------
97,
0.37
--------------------------
Grading
-------------
+Excavators ; 2; 8.00E
--------------
162'
0.38
---------------------------
Grading
--------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Graders ; 1; 8.00E
174'
0.41
----------------------------
Grading
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------t--------------
+Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 ; 8.00E
255'
0.40
----------------------------r--------------------------
Grading
-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Scrapers ; 2E 8.00E
361,
0.48
----------------------------
Grading
------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2E 8.00E
--------------
97'
0.37
----------------------------
Building Construction
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Cranes i 1; 7.00E
226'
0.29
----------------------------
Building Construction
r- --- - - - - - +------------+-------------t--------------
+Forklifts i 3; 8.00E
89'
0.20
----------------------------�--------------------------
Building Construction
-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Generator Sets ; 1 ; 8.00E
84'
0.74
----------------------------
Building Construction
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3; 7.00E
97'
0.37
----------------------------
Building Construction
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Welders ; 1; 8.00E
46'
0.45
----------------------------
Architectural Coating
--------------------------=-----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Air Compressors ; 1 ; 6.00E
78'
0.48
----------------------------
Paving
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Pavers i 2; 8.00E
125'
0.42
----------------------------
Paving
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------+-------------t--------------
+Paving Equipment i 2; 8.00E
130'
0.36
------------------- ------ ---f
--------------------------+-----------------i-------------T-------------r
-------------
Paving
:Rollers 2- 8.00,
80,
0.38
Trips and VMT
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling
Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7:
18.00
0.001
0.00;
11.00:
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
IHHDT
----------------
Grading
8;
-------------------------------
20.00:
0.00: 0.00:
4
11.00:
----------------------------------
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
':---------------------
EHDT Mix
IHHDT
----------------�--------------�
Building Construction
9:
----- - i----------=---------
583.00-
186.00: 0.00:
---------------------------------------------':---
11.00:
5.40:
20.00:LD_Mix
----------------
:HDT_Mix
IHHDT
-------------
ArchitecturalCoating
1;
----------
117.00-
---------
0.00i 0.00i
----------4----------=------------
11.00:
5.40:
----- ----
20.00:LD_Mix
----------I
EHDT_Mix
---------
:HHDT
r----------}----------r---------+------------
'
- -
�_-------------------------------
-------------------+----------
-- ----
Paving
6;
15.00,
0.00,
0.00,
11.00,
5.40,
20.00TLD_Mix
HDT_Mix
rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust -1 18.0663 0.0000 i 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 � i i 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road -1 5.0771 i 54.6323 i 41.1053 0.0391 i 2.9387 i 2.9387 i 2.7036 2.7036 i 4,065.005 i 4,065.005 i 1.2262 i i 4,090.754
3 i 3 i i i 4
Total
5.0771
54.6323
41.1053
0.0391
18.0663
2.9387
21.0049
9.9307
2.7036
12.6343
4,065.005
4,065.005
1.2262
4,090.754
11
3
3
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0709 i 0.1116 0.9545 1.6300e- i 0.1506 i 9.9000e- i 0.1516 0.0400 i 9.000Oe- 0.0409 132.3586 132.3586 i 8.7000e- i i 132.5413
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0709
0.1116
0.9545
1.6300e-
0.1506
9.9000e-
0.1516
0.0400
9.000Oe-
132.3586
8.7000e-
132.5413
003
004
004
[777132.3586
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 6.6936 0.0000 6.6936 i 3.6793 0.0000 3.6793 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road •1 0.9515 i 19.4584 i 23.4003 0.0391 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.0000 i 4,065.005 i 4,065.005 i 1.2262 4,090.754
3 i 3 i i i 4
Total
0.9515
19.4584
23.4003
0.0391
6.6936
0.9611
7.6546
3.6793
0.9611
4.6404
0.0000
4,065.005
4,065.005
1.2262
4:090.754
11
3
3
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.2 Site Preparation - 2016
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0709 i 0.1116 0.9545 1.6300e- i 0.0459 i 9.9000e- i 0.0469 0.0142 i 9.000Oe- 0.0152 + i 132.3586 132.3586 i 8.7000e- i i 132.5413
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0709
0.1116
0.9545
1.6300e-
0.0459
9.9000e-
0.0469
0.0142
9.000Oe-
132.3586
8.7000e-
132.5413
003
004
004
[777132.3586
003
3.3 Grading - 2016
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 6,4795 i 74.8137 i 49.1374 0.0617 i 3.5842 3.5842 i 3.2975 3.2975 i 6,414,980 i 6,414.980 1,9350 i 6,455.615
7 i 7 i i i 4
Total
6.4795
74.8137
49.1374
0.0617
8.6733
3.5842
12.2576
3.5965
3.2975
6.8940
6,414.980
6,414.980
1.9350
6,455.615
7
7
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.3 Grading - 2016
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0788 i 0.1240 1.0606 1.8100e- i 0.1673 i 1.0900e- i 0.1684 0.0444 i 1.0100e- 0.0454 + i 147.0651 147.0651 i 9.6700e- i i 147.2681
003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.0788
0.1240
1.0606
1.8100e-
0.1673
1.0900e-
0.1684
0.0444
1.0100e-
0.0454
147.0651
147.0651
9.6700e-
147.2681
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 3.2135 0.0000 3.2135 i 1.3325 0.0000 1.3325 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road 1.5128 i 29.7798 i 37.9432 0.0617 i 1.3234 1.3234 i 1.3234 1.3234 0.0000 i 6,414.980 i 6,414.980 1.9350 i 6,455.615
7 i 7 i i i 4
Total
1.5128
29.7798
37.9432
0.0617
3.2135
1.3234
4.5369
1.3325
1.3234
2.6559
0.0000
6,414.980
6,414.980
1.9350
6,455.615
11
7
7
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.3 Grading - 2016
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0788 i 0.1240 1.0606 1.8100e- i 0.0510 i 1.0900e- i 0.0521 0.0158 i 1.0100e- 0.0168 + i 147.0651 147.0651 i 9.6700e- i i 147.2681
003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.0788
0.1240
1.0606
1.8100e-
0.0510
1.0900e-
0.0521
0.0158
1.0100e-
0.0168
147.0651
147.0651
9.6700e-
147.2681
003
003
003
003
3.3 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •i 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 6.0991 i 69.5920 i 46.8050 0.0617 i 3.3172 i 3.3172 i 3.0518 3.0518 i 6,313.369 i 6,313.369 i 1.9344 i 6,353.991
0 i 0 5
Total
6.0991
69.5920
46.8050
0.0617
8.6733
3.3172
11.9905
3.5965
3.0518
6.6483
6,313.369
6,313.369
1.9344
6,353.991
0
0
5
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.3 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0707 i 0.1128 0.9559 1.8100e- i 0.1673 i 1.0600e- i 0.1684 0.0444 i 9.8000e- 0.0454 + i 141.0388 141.0388 i 8.9500e- i i 141.2268
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0707
0.1128
0.9559
1.8100e-
0.1673
1.0600e-
0.1684
0.0444
9.8000e-
0.0454
141.0388
141.0388
8.9500e-
141.2268
003
003
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 3.2135 0.0000 3.2135 i 1.3325 0.0000 1.3325 i 0.0000 0.0000
- --i-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------- --+ - i-------'-------'-------'-------+ ------
Off -Road •� 1.5128 i 29.7798 i 37.9432 0.0617 i 1.3234 1.3234 i 1.3234 1.3234 0.0000 i 6,313.369 i 6,313.369 i 1.9344 i 6,353.991
0 i 0 i i i 5
Total
1.5128
29.7798
37.9432
0.0617
3.2135
1.3234
4.5369
1.3325
1.3234
2.6559
0.0000
6,313.369
6,313.369
1.9344
6,353.991
11
0
0
5
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.3 Grading - 2017
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0707 i 0.1128 0.9559 1.8100e- i 0.0510 i 1.0600e- i 0.0521 0.0158 i 9.8000e- 0.0168 + i 141.0388 141.0388 i 8.9500e- i i 141.2268
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0707
0.1128
0.9559
1.8100e-
0.0510
1.0600e-
0.0521
0.0158
9.8000e-
0.0168
141.0388
141.0388
8.9500e-
141.2268
003
003
004
003
3.3 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •i 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 5.2895 i 59.5338 i 42.3068 0.0617 i 2.7880 2.7880 i 2.5650 2.5650 i 6,212.804 i 6,212.804 i 1.9341 i : 6,253.420
2 i 2 i i i 9
Total
5.2895
59.5338
42.3068
0.0617
8.6733
2.7880
11.4614
3.5965
2.5650
6.1615
6,212.804
6,212.804
1.9341
6,253.420
2
2
9
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.3 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0636 i 0.1033 0.8671 1.8100e- i 0.1673 i 1.0500e- i 0.1684 0.0444 i 9.7000e- 0.0454 + i 135.5852 135.5852 i 8.3500e- i i 135.7606
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0636
0.1033
0.8671
1.8100e-
0.1673
1.0500e-
0.1684
0.0444
9.7000e-
0.0454
135.5852
135.5852
8.3500e-
135.7606
003
003
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 3.2135 0.0000 3.2135 i 1.3325 0.0000 1.3325 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road •1 1.5128 i 29.7798 i 37.9432 0.0617 i 1.3234 1.3234 i 1.3234 1.3234 0.0000 i 6,212.804 i 6,212.804 i 1.9341 i 6,253.420
Total
1.5128
29.7798
37.9432
0.0617
3.2135
1.3234
4.5369
1.3325
1.3234
2.6559
0.0000
6,212.804
6,212.804
1.9341
6,253.420
11
1
1
9
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.3 Grading - 2018
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0636 i 0.1033 0.8671 1.8100e- i 0.0510 i 1.0500e- i 0.0520 0.0158 i 9.7000e- 0.0168 i 135.5852 135.5852 i 8.3500e- i i 135.7606
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0636
0.1033
0.8671
1.8100e-
0.0510
1.0500e-
0.0520
0.0158
9.7000e-
0.0168
135.5852
135.5852
8.3500e-
135.7606
003
003
004
003
3.3 Grading - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 4.8912 i 54.1978 i 40.2888 0.0617 i 2.5049 2.5049 i 2.3045 2.3045 i 6,111.312 i 6,111.312 1.9336 i 6,151.916
•�
i i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 7
Total
4.8912
54.1978
40.2888
0.0617
8.6733
2.5049
11.1783
3.5965
2.3045
5.9010
6,111.312
6,111.312
1.9336
6,151.916
1
1
7
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.3 Grading - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0584 i 0.0953 0.8003 1.8000e- i 0.1673 i 1.0500e- i 0.1684 0.0444 i 9.7000e- 0.0454 + i 130.4859 130.4859 i 7.8900e- i i 130.6516
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0584
0.0953
0.8003
1.8000e-
0.1673
1.0500e-
0.1684
0.0444
9.7000e-
0.0454
130.4859
130.4859
7.8900e-
130.6516
003
003
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i 3.2135 0.0000 3.2135 i 1.3325 0.0000 1.3325 i 0.0000 0.0000
-•-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------- -- --------'-------'-------'-------
Off -Road •� 1.5128 i 29.7798 i 37.9432 0.0617 i 1.3234 1.3234 i 1.3234 1.3234 0.0000 i 6,111.312 i 6,111.312 1.9336 i 6,151.916
•�
i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 7
Total
1.5128
29.7798
37.9432
0.0617
3.2135
1.3234
4.5369
1.3325
1.3234
2.6559
0.0000
6,111.312
6,111.312
1.9336
6,151.916
11
1
1
7
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.3 Grading - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0584 i 0.0953 0.8003 1.8000e- i 0.0510 i 1.0500e- i 0.0520 0.0158 i 9.7000e- 0.0168 i 130.4859 130.4859 i 7.8900e- i i 130.6516
003 003 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0584
0.0953
0.8003
1.8000e-
0.0510
1.0500e-
0.0520
0.0158
9.7000e-
0.0168
130.4859
130.4859
7.8900e-
130.6516
003
003
004
003
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 2.3516 i 20.9650 i 17.1204 0.0268 i 1.2850 1.2850 i 1.2083 1.2083 i 2,580.761 i 2,580.761 i 0.6279 i : 2,593.947
8 i 8 i i i 9
Total
2.3516
20.9650
17.1204
0.0268
1.2850
1.2850
1.2083
1.2083
2,580.761
2,580.761
0.6279
2,593.947
8
8
9
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.5371 i 10.1803 24.5681 i 0.0301 i 0.9025 i 0.2102 i 1.1127 0.2559 i 0.1933 0.4492 2,857.547 2,857.547 i 0.0193 i 1 2,857.952
0 i 0 i i i 8
Worker •i 1.7010 i 2.7787 23.3276 0.0526 i 4.8778 i 0.0305 i 4.9083 1.2938 i 0.0283 1.3221 + i 3,803.663 3,803.663 i 0.2301 i i 3,808.495
5 i 5 i i i 1
Total
3.2381
12.9589
47.8957
0.0827
5.7803
0.2407
6.0210
1.5497
0.2216
1.7713
6,661.210
6,661.210
0.2494
6,666.447
4
4
8
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,580.761 i 2,580.761 i 0.6279 2,593.947
8 i 8 i i i 9
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,580.761
2,580.761
0.6279
2,593.947
8
8
9
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.5371 i 10.1803 24.5681 i 0.0301 i 0.3714 i 0.2102 i 0.5815 0.1255 i 0.1933 0.3188 2,857.547 2,857.547 i 0.0193 2,857.952
0 i 0 i i i 8
Worker •i 1.7010 i 2.7787 23.3276 0.0526 i 1.4863 i 0.0305 i 1.5168 0.4614 i 0.0283 0.4896 + i 3,803.663 3,803.663 i 0.2301 3,808.495
5 i 5 i i i 1
Total
3.2381
12.9589
47.8957
0.0827
1.8577
0.2407
2.0984
0.5868
0.2216
0.8084
6,661.210
6,661.210
0.2494
6,666.447
4
4
8
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 2.1113 i 19.0839 i 16.8084 0.0268 i 1.1128 1.1128 i 1.0465 1.0465 i 2,542.479 i 2,542.479 i 0.6194 i 2,555.488
9 i 9 0
Total
2.1113
19.0839
16.8084
0.0268
1.1128
1.1128
1.0465
1.0465
2,542.479
2,542.479
0.6194
2,555.488
9
9
0
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.3126 i 8.6576 i 22.9315 i 0.0300 i 0.9021 i 0.1888 i 1.0909 0.2557 i 0.1737 0.4294 2,789.610 2,789.610 i 0.0186 i 1 2,790.001
7 i 7 i i i 8
Worker •i 1.5875 i 2.8011 i 21.7747 0.0528 i 4.8778 i 0.0306 i 4.9084 1.2938 i 0.0284 1.3222 + i 3,648.983 3,648.983 i 0.2193 i i 3,853.587
2 i 2 i i i 5
Total
2.9001
11.2587
44.7062
0.0826
5.7799
0.2194
5.9993
1.5495
0.2020
1.7515
6,438.594
6,438.594
0.2379
6,443.589
0
0
3
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,542.479 i 2,542.479 0.6194 2,555.488
9 i 9 0
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,542.479
2,542.479
0.6194
2,555.488
9
9
0
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.3126 i 8.6576 i 22.9315 i 0.0300 i 0.3709 i 0.1888 i 0.5597 0.1253 i 0.1737 0.2990 2,789.610 2,789.610 i 0.0186 i 1 2,790.001
7 i 7 i i i 8
Worker •i 1.5875 i 2.6011 i 21.7747 0.0526 i 1.4863 i 0.0306 i 1.5169 0.4614 i 0.0284 0.4897 + i 3,648.983 3,648.983 i 0.2193 i i 3,653.587
2 i 2 i i i 5
Total
2.9001
11.2587
44.7062
0.0826
1.8572
0.2194
2.0766
0.5867
0.2020
0.7887
6,438.594
6,438.594
0.2379
6,443.589
0
0
3
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.8931 i 17.3403 i 16.5376 0.0268 i 0.9549 0.9549 i 0.8979 0.8979 i 2,542.781 i 2,542.781 i 0.6126 i : 2,555.646
7 i 7 i i i 2
Total
1.8931
17.3403
16.5376
0.0268
0.9549
0.9549
0.8979
0.8979
2,542.781
2,542.781
0.6126
2,555.646
7
7
2
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
---•r------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------, +-------r------'-------'------- '---------------
Vendor •i 1.2175 i 7.1486 22.1088 i 0.0299 i 0.9020 i 0.1643 i 1.0663 0.2556 i 0.1512 0.4068 2,785.712 2,785.712 i 0.0188 i i 2,786.107
9 i 9 i i i 7
Worker •i 1.5062 i 2.4656 20.6979 0.0526 i 4.8778 i 0.0310 i 4.9088 1.2938 i 0.0287 1.3225 + i 3,595.119 3,595.119 i 0.2131 i i 3,599.593
4 i 4 i i i 5
Total
2.7238
9.6142
42.8067
0.0826
5.7798
0.1953
5.9750
1.5494
0.1799
0.2319
7,385.701
11
[7776,380.832
3
17380.832
3
2
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,542.781 i 2,542.781 i 0.6126 2,555.646
7 i 7 i i i 2
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,542.781
2,542.781
0.6126
2,555.646
7
7
2
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
---•r------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------, +-------r------'-------'------- '---------------
Vendor •i 1.2175 i 7.1486 22.1088 i 0.0299 i 0.3708 i 0.1643 i 0.5351 0.1253 i 0.1512 0.2764 2,785.712 2,785.712 i 0.0188 i i 2,786.107
9 i 9 i i i 7
Worker •i 1.5062 i 2.4656 20.6979 0.0526 i 1.4863 i 0.0310 i 1.5173 0.4614 i 0.0287 0.4901 + i 3,595.119 3,595.119 i 0.2131 i i 3,599.593
4 i 4 i i i 5
Total
2.7238
9.6142
42.8067
0.0826
1.8571
0.1953
2.0524
0.5866
0.1799
0.2319
7,385.701
11
[7776,380.832
3
17380.832
3
2
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.6992 i 15.5364 i 16.3276 0.0268 0.8057 0.8057 0.7581 0.7581 2,543.749 i 2,543.749 i 0.6085 2,556.528
7 i 7 i i i 6
Total
1.6992
15.5364
16.3276
0.0268
0.8057
0.8057
0.7581
0.7581
2,543.749
2,543.749
0.6085
2,556.528
7
7
6
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 28 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.1797 i 6.4331 21.7042 i 0.0299 i 0.9018 i 0.1617 i 1.0635 0.2556 i 0.1487 0.4043 2,782.154 2,782.154 i 0.0192 i i 2,782.556
0 i 0 i i i 1
Worker •i 1.4396 i 2.3647 19.6925 0.0526 i 4.8778 i 0.0311 i 4.9089 1.2938 i 0.0288 1.3226 + i 3,542.086 3,542.086 i 0.2071 i i 3,546.435
5 i 5 i i i 2
Total
2.6193
8.7977
41.3968
0.0825
5.7796
0.1928
5.9723
1.5494
0.1776
0.2262
6,328.991
[7776,324.240
5
17324.240
5
3
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,543.749 i 2,543.749 i 0.6085 2,556.528
7 i 7 i i i 6
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,543.749
2,543.749
0.6085
2,556.528
7
7
6
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 29 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.1797 i 6.4331 21.7042 i 0.0299 i 0.3706 i 0.1617 i 0.5323 0.1252 i 0.1487 0.2739 2,782.154 2,782.154 i 0.0192 i i 2,782.556
0 i 0 i i i 1
Worker •i 1.4396 i 2.3647 19.6925 0.0526 i 1.4863 i 0.0311 i 1.5174 0.4614 i 0.0288 0.4902 + i 3,542.086 3,542.086 i 0.2071 i i 3,546.435
5 i 5 i i i 2
Total
2.6193
8.7977
41.3968
0.0825
1.8569
0.1928
2.0497
0.5865
0.1776
0.2262
6,328.991
[7776,324.240
5
17324.240
5
3
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.5661 i 14.3126 i 16.2093 0.0268 i 0.6967 0.6967 i 0.6557 0.6557 i 2,544.626 i 2,544.626 i 0.6044 i : 2,557.319
2 i 2 i i i 1
Total
1.5661
14.3126
16.2093
0.0268
0.6967
0.6967
0.6557
0.6557
2,544.626
2,544.626
0.6044
2,557.319
2
2
1
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 30 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
+-------r------'------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •r------'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '----------------
Vendor •i 1.1001 i 5.6664 � 20.8605 i 0.0298 i 0.9016 i 0.1548 i 1.0564 � 0.2555 i 0.1424 � 0.3979 � i 2,775.081 2,775.081 i 0.0180 i i 2,775.460
9 i 9 i i i 8
Worker •i 1.3814 i 2.2803 18.8034 0.0526 i 4.8778 i 0.0312 i 4.9090 1.2938 i 0.0290 1.3228 + i 3,494.913 3,494.913 i 0.2020 i i 3,499.154
1 i 1 i i i 9
Total
2.4814
7.9467
39.6638
0.0824
5.7794
0.1860
5.9654
1.5493
0.1714
1.7207
6,269.995
6,269.995
0.2200
6,274.615
j
j
j
j
j
0
0
7
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.6712 i 14.1741 i 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 i 2,544.626 i 2,544.626 i 0.6044 2,557.319
2 i 2 i i i 1
Total
0.6712
14.1741
17.8156
0.0268
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.9016
0.0000
2,544.626
2,544.626
0.6044
2,557.319
2
2
1
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 31 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 1.1001 i 5.6664 20.8605 i 0.0298 i 0.3704 i 0.1548 i 0.5252 0.1251 i 0.1424 0.2675 2,775.081 2,775.081 i 0.0180 i i 2,775.460
9 i 9 i i i 8
Worker •i 1.3814 i 2.2803 18.8034 0.0526 i 1.4863 i 0.0312 i 1.5175 0.4614 i 0.0290 0.4903 + i 3,494.913 3,494.913 i 0.2020 i i 3,499.154
1 i 1 i i i 9
Total
2.4814
7.9467
39.6638
0.0824
1.8567
0.1860
2.0427
0.5865
0.1714
0.7578
6,269.995
6,269.995
0.2200
6,274.615
0
0
7
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
Ib/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •i 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.2664 i 1.8354 i 1.8413 2.9700e- i 0.1288 0.1288 i 0.1288 0.1288 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0238 i 281.9473
003
Total
67.8324
1.8354
1.8413
2.9700e-
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 32 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.3414 i 0.5576 4.6815 0.0106 i 0.9789 i 6.1200e- i 0.9850 0.2597 i 5.6700e- 0.2653 + i 763.3424 763.3424 i 0.0462 i i 764.3120
003 003
Total
0.3414
0.5576
4.6815
0.0106
0.9789
6.1200e-
0.9850
0.2597
5.6700e-
0.2653
763.3424
763.3424
0.0462
764.3120
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •� 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0238 i 281.9473
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 33 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.3414 i 0.5576 4.6815 0.0106 i 0.2983 i 6.1200e- i 0.3044 0.0926 i 5.6700e- 0.0983 + i 763.3424 763.3424 i 0.0462 i i 764.3120
003 003
Total
0.3414
0.5576
4.6815
0.0106
0.2983
6.1200e-
0.3044
0.0926
5.6700e-
0.0983
763.3424
763.3424
0.0462
764.3120
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- i 0.1109 0.1109 i 0.1109 0.1109 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0218 i 281.9057
003
Total
67.8081
1.6838
1.8314
2.9700e-
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 34 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.3186 i 0.5220 4.3699 0.0106 i 0.9789 i 6.1400e- i 0.9850 0.2597 i 5.6900e- 0.2653 + i 732.3002 732.3002 i 0.0440 733.2243
003 003
Total
0.3186
0.5220
4.3699
0.0106
0.9789
6.1400e-
0.9850
0.2597
5.6900e-
0.2653
732.3002
732.3002
0.0440
733.2243
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0218 i 281.9057
003
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 35 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.3186 i 0.5220 4.3699 0.0106 i 0.2983 i 6.1400e- i 0.3044 0.0926 i 5.6900e- 0.0983 + i 732.3002 732.3002 i 0.0440 733.2243
003 003
Total
0.3186
0.5220
4.3699
0.0106
0.2983
6.1400e-
0.3044
0.0926
5.6900e-
0.0983
732.3002
732.3002
0.0440
733.2243
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 2.9700e- i 0.0941 0.0941 i 0.0941 0.0941 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0193 i 281.8537
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.7848
1.5268
1.8176
2.9700e-
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 36 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.3023 i 0.4948 4.1538 0.0106 i 0.9789 i 6.2100e- i 0.9851 0.2597 i 5.7600e- 0.2654 + i 721.4905 721.4905 i 0.0428 i i 722.3884
003 003
Total
0.3023
0.4948
4.1538
0.0106
0.9789
6.2100e-
0.9851
0.2597
5.7600e-
0.2654
721.4905
721.4905
0.0428
722.3884
j
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0193 i 281.8537
003
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 37 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.3023 i 0.4948 4.1538 0.0106 i 0.2983 i 6.2100e- i 0.3045 0.0926 i 5.7600e- 0.0984 + i 721.4905 721.4905 i 0.0428 i i 722.3884
003 003
Total
0.3023
0.4948
4.1538
0.0106
0.2983
6.2100e-
0.3045
0.0926
5.7600e-
0.0984
721.4905
721.4905
0.0428
722.3884
j
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.2045 i 1.4085 i 1.8136 2.9700e- i 0.0817 0.0817 i 0.0817 0.0817 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0183 i 281.8329
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.7705
1.4085
1.8136
2.9700e-
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 38 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.2889 i 0.4746 3.9520 0.0106 i 0.9789 i 6.2400e- i 0.9851 0.2597 i 5.7900e- 0.2654 + i 710.8476 710.8476 i 0.0416 i i 711.7203
003 003
Total
0.2889
0.4746
3.9520
0.0106
0.9789
6.2400e-
0.9851
0.2597
5.7900e-
0.2654
710.8476
710.8476
0.0416
711.7203
j
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
1
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0183 i 281.8329
003
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 39 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.2889 i 0.4746 3.9520 0.0106 i 0.2983 i 6.2400e- i 0.3045 0.0926 i 5.7900e- 0.0984 + i 710.8476 710.8476 i 0.0416 i i 711.7203
003 003
Total
0.2889
0.4746
3.9520
0.0106
0.2983
6.2400e-
0.3045
0.0926
5.7900e-
0.0984
710.8476
710.8476
0.0416
711.7203
003
003
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
Ib/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •i 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.1917 i 1.3030 i 1.8111 2.9700e- i 0.0708 0.0708 i 0.0708 0.0708 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0168 i 281.8017
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.7576
1.3030
1.8111
2.9700e-
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 40 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.2772 i 0.4576 i 3.7736 0.0106 i 0.9789 i 6.2600e- i 0.9852 0.2597 i 5.8100e- 0.2655 + i 701.3805 701.3805 i 0.0405 i i 702.2318
003 003
Total
0.2772
0.4576
3.7736
0.0106
0.9789
6.2600e-
0.9852
0.2597
5.8100e-
0.2655
701.3805
701.3805
0.0405
702.2318
j
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
1
j
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating •1 67.5659 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road 0.0594 i 1.3570 i 1.8324 2.9700e- i 0.0951 0.0951 i 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 i 0.0168 i 281.8017
003 i i i i i i i i
Total
67.6254
1.3570
1.8324
2.9700e-
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0951
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
11
003
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 41 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000
-----------•-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+------ r------'-------'-------'-------+------
Worker •i 0.2772 i 0.4576 i 3.7736 0.0106 i 0.2983 i 6.2600e- i 0.3046 0.0926 i 5.8100e- 0.0984 + i 701.3805 701.3805 i 0.0405 i i 702.2318
003 003
Total
0.2772
0.4576
3.7736
0.0106
0.2983
6.2600e-
0.3046
0.0926
5.8100e-
701.3805
0.0405
702.2318
j
j
003
j
j
j
003
j
[777701.3805
j
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.0128 i 9.9983 i 14.2850 0.0223 0.5010 0.5010 0.4609 0.4609 2,160.613 i 2,160.613 i 0.6988 2,175.288
9 i 9 i i i 4
Paving 2.2544 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000
Total
3.2672
9.9983
14.2850
0.0223
0.5010
0.5010
0.4609
0.4609
2,160.613
2,160.613
0.6988
2,175.288
11
9
9
4
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 42 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
------- ------- '------- '------- '------- -------
------------ •------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ' ------- '----------------
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0355 i 0.0587 0.4838 1.3500e- i 0.1255 i 8.000Oe- i 0.1263 0.0333 i 7.5000e- 0.0340 i 89.9206 89.9206 i 5.2000e- i i 90.0297
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0355
0.0587
0.4838
1.3500e-
0.1255
8.000Oe-
0.1263
0.0333
7.5000e-
0.0340
89.9206
89.9206
5.2000e-
90.0297
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.5490 i 11.0645 i 16.9276 0.0223 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982 0.0000 i 2,160.613 i 2,160.613 i 0.6988 2,175.288
9 i 9 i i i 4
Paving •1 2,2544 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000
Total
2.8034
11.0645
16.9276
0.0223
0.5982
0.5982
0.5982
0.5982
0.0000
2,160.613
2,160.613
0.6988
2,175.288
11
9
9
4
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 43 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
3.6 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000
1
Worker •i 0.0355 i 0.0587 0.4838 1.3500e- i 0.0382 i 8.00OOe- i 0.0390 i 0.0119 i 7.5000e- 0.0126 i 89.9206 89.9206 i 5.2000e- i i 90.0297
003 004 004 . 003 i
Total
0.0355
0.0587
0.4838
1.3500e-
0.0382
8.00OOe-
0.0390
0.0119
7.5000e-
0.0126
89.9206
89.9206
5.2000e-
90.0297
003
004
004
003
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Density
Increase Diversity
Improve Walkability Design
Improve Destination Accessibility
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 44 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Category
E55.1764
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated 305.0550
0.3621 i 23.5980 i 0.7977
24.3957
i 6.2997
i 0.7350
7.0347
28,070.85 28,070.85 1.2295
i i 28,096.67
Unmitigated
•• 31.6066 79.2896 370.0575
0.6047 41.0810 1.3075
42.3885
10.9670
1.2044
12.1714
46,994.66 • 46,994.66 • 1.9069
- 47,034,71
77 77
25
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise ; 988.50 1,074.00 910.50 2,213,593 1,271,545
. . .. . . .. . . . . .A - - - - - - - -f - - - - - - - - - - -
• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. - - - - - - - - - __________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Apartments Mid Rise 527.20 , 572.80 485.60 1.180.583 678,157
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
City Park + 55.65 ; 55.65 55.65 106,102 60,948
......................................-----------------------T-------------------------------- --------------------------
Strip Mall + 1,551.20 ; 1,471.40 715.05 1,658,658 952,776
.................................................. ---------- ---------- ---------------------- -----------------------
General Office Building + 110.10 ; 23.70 9.80 178,048 102,275
................................................... ---------- - ----------- ---------------------- -----------------------
T Y
General Office Building ; 781.71 168.27 69.58 1,264,143 726,156
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .----------T . . .. - - - - - - - ---------------------------------------------------
Y
General Office Building ; 55.05 11.85 4.90 89,024 51,138
A------------
..................................... ---------- ----------- ----------------------------------------------------
Golf Coup se , 782.79 790.86 1.144.481 657,419
:
.............. _ _ _-677.88
............... --------------T --Y - -
Golf Course ; 75.60 ; 87.30 88.20 127,637 73,318
......................................-----------
;-----------T-----------Y---------------------------------------------------
Hotel + 1,143.80 , 1,146.60 833.00 1,633,249 938,180
.................................................. ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r
Hotel ; 1,634.00 ; 1,638.00 1190.00 2,333,213 1,340,257
. .
.................................................. ---------- ---------- ---------------------- -----------------------
T y
Other Asphalt Surfaces + 0.00 0.00 0.00
.................................................. -----------------------------------------------.-------------------------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 0.00 0.00
...................... ...... ...... ....________-__ __----------- ------------------------ --------------------------
Quality Restaurant ; 449.75 471.80 360.80 376,413 216,221
�_
.................................................. ------------------------------------------- -------------------------
Single Family Housing + 2,440.35 ; 2,570.40 2236.35 5,435,239 3,122,141
Total 10,490.79
10,074.56
7,750.29
17,740,383
10,190,532
4.3 Trip Type Information
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 45 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
1
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
7-Miles
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H O or C-NW
H-W or C-W H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
=ed
Pass -by
Apartments Mid Rise ; 11.00
3.50
4.50
40.20
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
........................--------------------
.......... r - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
-- - - ------ - -
Apartments Mid Rise 11.00
3.50
4.50 v
40.20
;-
19.20
, 40.60
86
11
3
....................... .----------- ----------
City Park ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
-----------------
33.00
1 48.00
I ----------------------------------------------------
19.00
66
28
6
.......................---------------------
------
Strip Mall 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
16.60
1 64.40
19.00
45
40
15
......... ...............-------------------
General Office Building ; 12.50 4.20
r--------�
5.40
33.00
I 48.00
---�
19.00
---------
77
---------- -----------------
19
4
...............---12.5-------------
General Office Building 12.50
4.20
5.40
33.00
48.00
1900.
77
19
4
......... ...............-------------------
General Office Building ; 12.50 4.20 T
---;r-
5.40
-------�
33.00
--------�
48.00
----------------------
T 19.00
77
---------- -----------------
19
4
Golf Course 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
33.00
48.00
19.00
52
39
9
........................-------------------- T
Golf Course 12.50 4.20
....... :
----------�
5.40
33.00
........
48.00
T ...........: ..
19.00
--------
52
-------- -----------------
39
9
........................--------------------
-r--------�
--------------
Hotel 12.50
4.20
5.40 r
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
....................... .----------- ----------
Hotel ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
--------
19.40
1 61.60
19.00
58
------ -----------------
38
4
........................--------------------
--- ---------
-----------------
Other Asphalt Surfaces 12.50
4.20
5.40 v
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
........................----------- ----------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces ; 12.50 4.20
5.40
-------
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
-----------------
0
0
........................--------------------
_
T
--------------
Quality Restaurant 12.50
4.20
5.40 i
12.00
69.00
19.00
38
18
44
....................... r----------rt---------T----------,F
Single Family Housing 11.00 3.50
4.50
------------------ r--------t-----------
40.20 19.20 40.60
---------
86
-------- -----------------
11
3
LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
0.471073• 0.065210, 0.167869, 0.157103, 0.039378, 0.006346, 0.011728, 0.072116, 0.001386, 0.001196, 0.003702, 0.000530, 0.002362
§.g FenffggPetaiI
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 46 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
ROG
NOx I
CO
I S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas •i
0.8814 7.8522 5.5544 0.0481 0.6090
0.6090
0.6090
0.6090
` i 9,615.145 9,615.145 0.1843
i 0.1763 1 9,673.661
Mitigated
7 7
- - - - - - - - - - - —
------------ +--------------I--------------- --------------- +--------------#---------------+--------------I---------------}--------------- - - - - - - - + - - - - - - --------- ------ ------------- --4---------------4---------------+ - - - - - - -
NaturalGas
1.0132 9.0278 6.3936 0.0553 0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
• 11,053.17 11,053.17 • 0.2119
- 0.2026 11,120.44
Unmitigated
23 23
01
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 47 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
I
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Mid 2628.77 �i 0.0284 i 0.2423 0.1031 i 1.5500e- 0.0196 i 0.0196 0.0196 0.0196 309.2667 i 309.2667 i 5.9300e- 5.6700e- 311.1489
Rise 003 . 003 003 i
----------- ------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------� '-------'-------'------- �------ter i i i i i i i i r------i '* - - - - - - -
Apartments Mid 4928.94 -1 0.0532 i 0.4542 0.1933 i 2.9000e- i 0.0367 i 0.0367 i 0.0367 0.0367 i 579.8751 579.8751 i 0.0111 0.0106 583.4041
Rise 003
City Park � 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
---- - -- - ter - - --- -i i i i i i i i r---- - -i i i '*-------
General Office 100 :i 1.0800e- i 9.8000e- i 8.24OOe- i 6.000Oe- i 7.5000e- i 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- i 11.7647 11.7647 i 2.3000e- 2.2000e- 11.8363
Building i .� 003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . i004 004
General Office 50 q 5.4000e- i 4.9000e- i 4.1200e- i 3.000Oe- 3.7000e- i 3.7000e- � i 3.7000e- 3.7000e- 5.8824 i 5.8824 i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- i 5.9182
Building i .: 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 i 004
i � � i � i i � �
-�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i *-------
--------- ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+---- -� '-------'-------'-------
General Office 710 q 7.6600e- i 0.0696 i 0.0585 4.2000e- i 5.2900e- i 5.2900e- 5.29OOe- 5.2900e- i 83.5294 83.5294 i 1.6000e- i 1.5300e- 84.0378
Building i .: 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 003 003 i
- ---- ---------�i-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------i-------'-----------------------t-------
Golf Course � 0 .1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
- ------ ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------� '-------'-------'------- -�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
Hotel 28675.5 -i 0.3093 i 2.8113 i 2.3615 i 0.0169 i 0.2137 i 0.2137 i 0.2137 0.2137 + i 3,373.589 3,373.589 i 0.0647 i 0.0619 3,394.120
0 i 0 i 1
- ---- - ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------------------'-------'-------'-------
Hotel 29244.2 q 0.3154 i 2.8671 i 2.4084 i 0.0172 i 0.2179 i 0.2179 i 0.2179 0.2179 i 3,440.493 i 3,440.493 i 0.0659 0.0631 i 3,461.431
2 i 2 i i i 4
---------- ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------'-------'-------'-------
Other Asphalt 0 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 + i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
�1
Surfaces
- ------ ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'----------------------'-------'-------'-------
Quality 3801.51 -i 0.0410 i 0.3727 i 0.3131 i 2.24OOe- i 0.0283 i 0.0283 i 0.0283 0.0283 i 447.2361 i 447.2361 i 8.57OOe- 8.2000e- i 449.9579
Restaurant i .I 003 . 003 003 i
Single Family 23590.E .i 0.2544 i 2.1740 i 0.9251 i 0.0139 i 0.1758 i 0.1758 i i 0.1758 0.1758 i 2,775.363 2,775.363 i 0.0532 i 0.0509 : 2,792.253
Housing 3 3 i 7
Strip Mall 222.466 �i 2.4000e- i 0.0218 i 0.0183 i 1.3000e- i 1.6600e- i 1.6600e- i i 1.6600e- 1.6600e- T 26.1724 i 26.1724 i 5.000Oe- 4.8000e- i 26.3317
003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 004 004 i
Total
1.0132
9.0278
6.3936
0.0553
0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
11,053.17
11753.17
0.2118
0.2027
11,120.44
23
23
01
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 48 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
City Park 0 �i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
---------- ;I---------------------- +------- '-------'-------'-------
General Office i 0.0425 q 4.6000e- i 4.1700e- 3.5000e- i 3.000Oe- i 3.2000e- i 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- i 5.0000 5.0000 i 1.000Oe- i 9.000Oe- 5.0304
Building i .� 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . i004 005
General Office 0.085 �i 9.2000e- i 8.3300e- i 7.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- i 6.3000e- i 6.3000e- i 6.3000e- 6.3000e- i 10.0000 i 10.0000 i 1.9000e- 1.8000e- 10.0609
Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004
� i 004 i 004
i � � i � i i � .
---------- N'-------'------- '-------'-------'------- '------- '------- '--------------- +------- '-------'-------'------- -�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
General Office 0.6035 -i 6.5100e- i 0.0592 i 0.0497 3.5000e- i 4.5000e- i 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- i 71.0000 71.0000 i 1.3600e- 1.3000e- 71.4321
Building i .� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 003 003 i
--ter �- t- ------
Golf Course i 0 i i i i i i i i i i i
0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
.1
-------- I ��'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------� '-------'-------'-------
-�------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
Hotel 24.7065 q 0.2664 i 2.4222 i 2.0347 i 0.0145 i 0.1841 i 0.1841 i 0.1841 0.1841 + i 2,906.650 2,906.650 i 0.0557 i 0.0533 2,924.339
0 i 0 i 4
- ------ ��-------- ------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '---------------------- '-------'-------'-------
Hotel 25.1965 q 0.2717 i 2.4702 i 2.0750 i 0.0148 i 0.1877 i 0.1877 i 0.1877 0.1877 i 2,964.293 i 2,964.293 i 0.0568 0.0544 i 2,982.334
9 i 9 i 1
---------- -�------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+-------� '-------'-------'------- --ter +-------
�-
Other Asphalt 0 i i i i i i i i i i i
0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
.1
Surfaces
- ---- - -�'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-----------------------'-------'-------'-------
Quality 3.63355 q 0.0392 0.3562 i 0.2992 i 2.1400e- i 0.0271 i 0.0271 i 0.0271 0.0271 i 427.4762 i 427.4762 i 8.1900e- 7.8400e- T 430.0778
Restaurant 003 . 003 003 i
--------ter------i i i i i i i i r------i i i '*-------
Single Family 20.6755 -1 0.2230 i 1.9054 i 0.8108 i 0.0122 i 0.1541 i 0.1541 i 0.1541 0.1541 + i 2,432.416 2,432.416 i 0.0466 i 0.0446 2,447.220
Housing 7 7 i 0
--------- I ��'------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- '------- ---------------� '------- '------- '-------
Strip Mall 0.193411 :i 2.0900e- 0.0190 i 0.0159 i 1.1000e- i 1.4400e- i 1.4400e- i i 1.4400e- 1.4400e- i 22.7542 i 22.7542 i 4.4000e- 4.2000e- i 22.8927
i .: 003 004 003 003 003 003 . i 004 004 i
----------- '-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'---------------+---- -� '-------'-------'-------
Apartments Mid 2.29294 :i 0.0247 i 0.2113 i 0.0899 i 1.3500e- i 0.0171 i 0.0171 i i 0.0171 0.0171 + i 269.7582 269.7582 i 5.1700e- 4.9500e- 271.3999
Rise 003 . 003 003 i
Apartments Mid 4.29927 �i 0.0464 i 0.3962 i 0.1686 i 2.5300e- i 0.0320 i 0.0320 i i 0.0320 0.0320 i 505.7965 i 505.7965 i 9.6900e- 9.2700e- i 508.8747
Rise 003 . 003 003 i
Total
0.8814
7.8522
5.5544
0.0481
0.6090
0.6090
0.6090
0.67
9,615.145
9,615.145
0.1843
0.1763
9,673.661
7
7
9
6.0 Area Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 49 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non -Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non -Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
ROG
NOx
CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
177Total
CO2
I CH4
N20
I CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated •i 29.5811 i 0.4650
i 40.2888 2.1200e-
i i 1.1287
i 1.1287
1.1191
1.1191
0.0000 i 14,403.37 i 14,403.37 i 0.3453 i 0.2627
i 14,492.07
003
i i
i
i i
�
, 57 57
67
i � i � i i
-------------i i i i
Unmitigated •• 48.4088 - 0,4650
40.2888 2.1200e-
1.1287
1.1287
1.1191
1.1191
0.0000 14,403.37 • 14,403.37 - 0.3453 • 0.2627
14,492.07
003
57 57
67
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 50 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural •i 21.2324 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000
Coating
i
Consumer •i 24.6335 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000
Products
Hearth •i 1.3137 i 6.000Oe- i 0.0717 i 0.0000 0.9076 i 0.9076 i i 0.8981 0.8981 0.0000 i 14,331.17 i 14,331.17 i 0.2747 i 0.2627 i 14,418.39
005 . 65 65 i 36
Landscaping •i 1.2292 0.4650 i 40.2172 i 2.1200e- 0.2210 i 0.2210 i i 0.2210 0.2210 i 72.1992 i 72.1992 i 0.0707 i i 73.6831
003
Total
48.4088
0.4650
40.2888
2.1200e-
1.1287
1.1287
1.1191
1.1191
0.0000
14,403.37
14,403.37
0.3453
0.2627
14,492.07
003
57
57
67
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 51 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural •i 4.2465 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000
Coating
i i i i i
Consumer •i 22.7918 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000
Products
Hearth •i 1.3137 i 6.000Oe- i 0.0717 i 0.0000 0.9076 i 0.9076 i i 0.8981 0.8981 0.0000 i 14,331.17 i 14,331.17 i 0.2747 i 0.2627 i 14,418.39
005 . 65 65 i 36
Landscaping •i 1.2292 0.4650 i 40.2172 i 2.1200e- 0.2210 i 0.2210 i i 0.2210 0.2210 i 72.1992 i 72.1992 i 0.0707 i i 73.6831
003
Total
29.5811
0.4650
40.2888
2.1200e-
1.1287
1.1287
1.1191
1.1191
0.0000
14,403.37
14,403.37
0.3453
0.2627
14,492.07
003
57
57
67
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Apply Water Conservation Strategy
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 52 of 52 Date: 10/7/2014 12:18 PM
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Vegetation
CITY OF LA QUINTA
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
PROJECT NAME: The Ranch/SilverRock Resort SCH No.: 1999081020 APPROVAL DATE: May 15th, 2002/July 18th, 2006
The Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act. It is the intent of this program
to (1) verify satisfaction of the required mitigation measures; (2) provide a methodology to document implementation of the required mitigation; (3) provide a record of the
Monitoring Program; (4) identify monitoring responsibility; (5) establish administrative procedures for the clearance of mitigation measures; (6) establish the frequency and
duration of monitoring; and (7) utilize existing review processes wherever feasible.
The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated in to the approval for this project in order to mitigate potentially significant environmental impacts to a level
of insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that this mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the
City of La Quinta's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
Env. Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Geology
The soils at the site
Prior to the design and construction of any structural
Receipt of site
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
have the potential
improvements, a comprehensive design level
specific
issuance of any
for
geotechnical evaluations shall be prepared that
geotechnical/
grading permits
hydroconsolidation
includes subsurface exploration and laboratory testing.
engineering
with the addition of
Recommendations for grading/earthwork, surface and
plans for the
water
subsurface drainage, foundations, pavement structural
Project
sections, and other pertinent geotechnical design
considerations shall be formulated and implemented
based on the findings of this evaluation.
The Project Site
All buildings planned as a result of the Proposed
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
would be subject to
Project shall be constructed in conformance with the
construction
issuance of any
ground shaking
Uniform Building Code, as adopted by the City of La
plans
building permits
during a seismic
Quinta.
event.
Water
The project would
During construction activities, water trucks are to
Field
City of La Quinta
Ongoing during
use potable water
acquire water from non -potable water sources, such as
inspection
construction
for dust
reclaimed water and/or canal water.
suppression instead
of reclaimed water
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Cumulative use of
At such time that non -potable water sources become
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
potable water for
available to the project site, the project shall connect
landscape and
and Coachella
issuance of
irrigation would
to this resource and utilize the non -potable water for
project plans
Valley Water
building permits.
incrementally
irrigation purposes.
to identify the
District
contribute to the
ability to
demand on water
connect to
supplies
non -potable
water sources
in the future
Drought tolerant landscaping shall be utilized as a
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
means of reducing water consumption.
landscape and
issuance of
project plans
building permits
The project will
A hydrology master plan shall be prepared for the
Receipt of site
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
result in changes to
Project Specific Plan. Further, a hydrology study shall
hydrology
issuance of grading
absorption rates,
be prepared to support the hydrology master plan.
master plan
permits
drainage patterns,
This study shall demonstrate that the project would
and study for
or the rate and
construct storm drainage and hydrologic
the Project
amount of surface
improvements, such as on -site stormwater retention
runoff
basins, that conform to the City`s master hydrology and
storm drain improvement program as well as
implement regional and local requirements, policies
and programs.
Prior to the initiation of any construction activity on the
Provide NOI
Regional Water
Prior to the
project site, a Notice of Intent (NOI), Storm Water
and
Quality Control
issuance of any
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and Monitoring
verification
Board
grading permits
Plan will be filed with the RWQCB under the general
that it was
NPDES construction permit. The SWPPP shall include
sent to
Best Management Practices (BMPs) in compliance with
RWQCB
the NPDES program requirements.
Any existing groundwater wells located on the site that
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
are no longer in use shall be abandoned in accordance
construction
issuance of any
with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations prior
plans
grading permits
to the issuance of building permits.
-2-
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Design of new roads, golf courses, man-made ponds,
Review of site,
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
common landscape areas, storm water basins, and
storm
issuance of grading
other facilities shall incorporate proper engineering
drainage and
permits
controls to channel storm and irrigation runoff into
landscape
detention/retention facilities that are sized to
plans
accommodate design year storms and that incorporate
filtration systems or other devices to reduce the
potential for herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and
other contaminants to percolate to groundwater or
surface water runoff.
Water from golf
Prior to operation of the golf course, the golf course
Receipt of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
course operation
operator shall prepare a Golf Course Management Plan
Golf Course
issuance of
would contain
that includes an irrigation plan, water usage plan, and
Management
operation permit
pollutants that
chemical management plan in order to reduce, to the
Plan
impact
extent feasible, golf course irrigation runoff and
groundwater
percolation into the groundwater basin.
quality
Air Quality
Construction
Construction equipment shall be phased and operated
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
activity generates
in a manner to ensure the lowest construction -related
construction
grading permit
vehicular air quality
pollutant emission levels practical, and shall require the
management
pollutants
use of water trucks, temporary irrigation systems and
plan
other measures which will limit fugitive dust emissions
during site disturbance and construction.
The following measures shall be implemented to
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
reduce construction related traffic congestion:
construction
issuance of grading
• Configure construction parking to minimize traffic
management
permit
disturbance
plan
• Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes
• Provide flag person to ensure safety at
construction sites, as necessary
• Schedule operations affecting roadways for off-
peak traffic hours
• Provide rideshare incentives to construction
personnel
-3-
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Emissions of PM10
A PM10 Management Plan for construction operations
Review of dust
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
would exceed the
shall be submitted prior to the issuance of grading
control plan
grading permit
thresholds of
permits. The plan shall include dust management
significance during
controls such as:
construction
• Water site and equipment morning and evening
• Spread soil binders on site, unpaved roads, and
parking areas
• Re-establish ground cover on construction site
through seeding and watering
• Pave construction roads, where appropriate
• Operate street -sweepers on paved roads adjacent
to site
Air quality control measures identified in the Coachella
Review of dust
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan shall be
control plan
grading permit
implemented.
To reduce VOC emissions associated with architectural
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
coatings, water -based or low-VOC coatings shall be
construction
building permit
used and applied with spray equipment with high
management
transfer efficiency and/or the need for paints and
plan
solvents should be reduced by using pre -coated
building materials or naturally colored building
materials.
-4-
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Operation of the
Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
proposed project
solar or low emission water heaters to reduce natural
construction
occupancy permit
would result in
gas consumption and emissions.
and site plans
increased air
pollutant
Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize
emissions.
built-in energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy
consumption and emissions.
Shade trees shall be provided in close proximity to
Timeshare, hotel and golf facility structures to reduce
building heating/cooling needs.
Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize
energy -efficient and automated controls for air
conditioners to reduce energy consumption and
emissions.
Timeshare and golf facility construction shall be
constructed using special sunlight -filtering window
coatings or double -paned windows to reduce thermal
gain or loss.
Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize
automatic lighting on/off controls and energy -efficient
lighting (including parking areas) to reduce electricity
consumption and associated emissions.
Timeshare and golf facility construction shall use light-
colored roofing materials in residential construction as
opposed to dark roofing materials.
Bus stops shall be positioned at locations on and
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
adjacent to the site to be determined in coordination
construction
grading permit
with the bus transit service provider that will serve the
and site plans
project area. Bus stops should be generally located 1/4
mile walking distance from Timeshare units.
The golf course shall design on -site circulation plans for
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
clubhouse parking to reduce vehicle queuing.
construction
grading permit
and site plans
-5-
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Transporta
Increases in local
A traffic signal shall be installed at the Project entrance
Warrant study
City of La Quinta
Ongoing
tion and
roadway volumes
and Avenue 52, the Project entrance and Jefferson
Circulation
would
Street and at the intersection of Avenue 54 and
incrementally
Jefferson Street when and if they are warranted. The
decrease
developer of the site shall be responsible for payment
intersection LOS
of a fair share of the cost of installing these signals.
Biological
During construction
Efforts shall be made to ensure that all pesticides,
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
Resources
and landscaping
fungicides, herbicides and fertilizers used during the
Construction
issuance of grading
activities, impacts
construction and operation of the Project Site will not
and
permits
to common wildlife
be harmful to wildlife.
Landscaping
would occur
plan
During construction
A construction plan shall be prepared and
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
and operation,
demonstrate, to the extent practicable, construction
Construction
issuance of grading
there is a potential
activities that emit excessive noise will be avoided
plan
permits
impact to
adjacent to the hillside. In addition, during grading and
Peninsular bighorn
construction activities any blasting or pile -driving near
sheep and other
the hillside will not occur during the period from Jan. 1
wildlife
through June 30th.
Potential impact to
The landscape plan shall include only plants that are
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
Peninsular bighorn
non -toxic to wildlife. All exotic plans such as tamarisk
project
building permit
sheep from
and fountain grass are prohibited. Existing trees may
landscape
increased human
remain.
plan
presence on Project
Site
I2
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
A mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
has been prepared to protect peninsular big horn
construction,
grading permit
sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non-
landscape and
mountainous portion of the site proposed for
site plan
development. This concept plan illustrates a continuos
(Agency shall,
buffer to the toe -of -slope in areas where development
to the extent
could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The
practical,
concept plan delineates the location, acreage and
widen the
native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area.
narrowest
This plan shall be incorporated into the project design
points of the
and shall be subject to review by the City prior to the
buffer areas
issuance of grading permits. A copy of this mountain
to minimize
toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan is available
the impacts
for review at the City of La Quinta Community
on the hillside)
Development Department.
If Bighorn Sheep enter onto the Project Site, an 8-foot
The Agency
City of La Quinta
Ongoing
fence (or the functional equivalent) between the
shall
development and the hillside shall be constructed. The
guarantee to
gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If
pay
determined necessary, the City shall construct
the design and
temporary fencing while permanent fencing is
construction
constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which
costs for the
Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency transfer
fencing, and
or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the
that if the
hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient
property
for the construction of fencing if needed in the future.
is transferred,
it shall require
that the
subsequent
owner bond
or posts
sufficient
security for
the
completion of
the fence
should it arise
in the
future.
-7-
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Dogs shall not be permitted to be loose within the
Review of
City of La Quinta
Ongoing
project area, and shall be kept away from the hillside
landscape and
areas through appropriate signage and fencing, where
signage plan
applicable.
Access into the hillside area from the site will be
Review of site
City of La Quinta,
Prior to issuance of
discouraged through the use of signs or barricades, if
and signage
CDFG, USFWS
occupancy permit
necessary, unless the access is provided as part of a trail
plan
system that is approved by the USFWS and CDFG.
There is a potential
The final design of the project shall insure that road and
Review of site
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
impact from
driveways are designed to minimize headlight shine
and
issuance of grading
nighttime light on
from vehicles onto the hillside.
construction
permit
wildlife
plan
There is a potential
In all areas adjacent to the hillsides, non -glare glass
Review of site
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
impact from glare
shall be used in new construction. Exterior building
and
issuance of
and exterior
lights shall not shine on the hillside. Exterior lighting
construction
building permit
lighting on wildlife
shall be kept at the safest possible minimum intensity
plan
and aimed away from the hillside.
All swimming pools located on the Project Site shall be
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
fenced pursuant to City regulations.
construction
issuance of grading
plan
permit
Potential impact to
Prior to any construction or site preparation activities
Verification of
City of La Quinta,
Prior to the
mesquite hummock
that would impact the 3.4 acres of mesquite hummock,
receipt of
CDFG
issuance of grading
habitat
the agency or project developer shall enter into a
financial
permit
Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) with CDFG and
security
an appropriate non-profit organization whose purpose
instrument
is to acquire and manage land for the purpose of
and copy of
protecting special status plants and wildlife. This MOU
the MOU
shall provide the organization chosen the financial
resources necessary to purchase and manage 3.4 acres
of mesquite hummock in the Willow Hole area or in
another area where the habitat is contiguous and large
preserves already protect much of this habitat type.
The exact location and cost shall be determined
through consultation with CDFG and the selected
organization.
W
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Potential impact to
Prior to the commencement of on -site grading, a 404
Receipt of
City of La Quinta,
Prior to the
areas under the
permit shall be obtained, if legally required, for
required
CDFG, ACOE
issuance of grading
jurisdiction of the
alteration of areas under the ACOE jurisdiction. In
permits
permit
ACOE and the CDFG
addition, if development activities are to take place
within streambeds or drainages under the jurisdiction
of the CDFG, a streambed alteration agreement shall
first be obtained, if legally required.
Hazards
Exposure to
Prior to the demolition or renovation of the on -site
Proof that a
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
asbestos is a
single family residence, asbestos containing materials
qualified
issuance of
significant impact
(ACM) shall be removed in accordance with current
demolition
demolition permit
regulatory guidelines.
team has been
retained
Noise
Construction noise
Between May 1 and September 30, all construction
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
would impact local
activities on the project site shall only occur between
construction
issuance of grading
residents and
the hours of 6:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through
plans
permit
sensitive receptors
Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, and
shall be prohibited on Sundays and public holidays.
Between October 1 and April 30, all construction
activity on the project site shall only occur between the
hours of 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday,
and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, and shall be
prohibited on Sundays and public holidays. All
operational activities of the Project shall also be
subject to the Noise Ordinance of the City as well.
All construction equipment operating in the planning
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
area shall be fitted with well -maintained functional
construction
issuance of grading
mufflers to limit noise emissions.
plans
permit, ongoing
throughout
construction
To the greatest extent feasible, earth moving and
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
hauling routes shall be located away from existing
construction
issuance of grading
residences.
plans
permit
The design, selection and placement of the mechanical
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
equipment for various buildings shall include
construction
issuance of
consideration of the potential noise impact they may
plans
building permit
have on uses within the development site.
-9-
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Silencers and/or barriers shall be provided where
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
necessary at outdoor equipment, such as cooling
construction
issuance of
towers, air cooled condensers and refrigeration
plans
building permit
compressors/condenser units, and at the air intake and
discharge openings for building ventilation systems.
Public
The proposed
The Riverside County Fire Department, in its review of
Review of site
Riverside County
Prior to the
Services
project would
new development proposals, shall evaluate project
and landscape
Fire Department
issuance of grading
incrementally
plans and the Department's ability to provide proper
plan
and City of La
permit
increase demand
fire protection. This review shall include, but shall not
Quinta
for service on the
be limited to, internal circulation, project directories,
Riverside County
street names, and numbering systems. New
Fire Department
developments shall comply with all City and Fire
Department standards.
The proposed
The Riverside County Sheriff's Department shall review
Review of site
Riverside County
Prior to the
project would
new development proposals in order to evaluate
and landscape
Sheriff
issuance of grading
incrementally
project plans and the Department's ability to provide
plan
Department and
permit
increase demand
adequate police protection. This review should
City of La Quinta
for service on the
include, but not be limited to internal circulation,
Riverside County
project directories, street names, and numbering
Sheriff Department
systems. New developments shall comply with all
established City and Sheriff standards.
Utilities
The project would
The most efficient furnaces, water heaters, pool
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
and
result in an
heaters and other equipment that use natural gas shall
construction
issuance of
Service
incremental
be used in project construction. The use of kitchen
plan
building permits
Systems
increase in
appliances that use natural gas and alternative,
electrical demand
renewable energy sources, including solar and wind
turbine technologies shall also be used to the greatest
extent feasible.
Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, which
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
addresses energy conservation in all proposed uses
construction
issuance of
shall be strictly enforced in project design and
plan
building permits
construction.
The use of septic
All planned uses shall be connected to the city-wide
Review of
Coachella Valley
Prior to issuance of
systems in the City
sewer system.
construction
Water District
grading permit
could result in
plan
potential impacts
-10-
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Any existing or historic septic systems located on the
Review of
Coachella Valley
Prior to issuance of
site shall be abandoned in accordance with Federal,
construction
Water District and
grading permit
State, and local laws and regulations prior to the
plan
City of La Quinta
issuance of building permits.
The incremental
A recycling program shall be developed for all
Receipt of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
increase in solid
proposed uses. Recycling provisions for commercial
recycling
issuance of
waste generation
and business establishments should include separate
program
occupancy permit
could result in
recycling bins. Items to be recycled at commercial
potential impacts
establishments may include white paper, computer
legal paper, cardboard, glass and aluminum cans.
Professional landscaping services from companies
Verification
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
which compost green waste shall be utilized.
that a
issuance of
qualified
occupancy permit
landscaping
service has
been retained
The incremental
The Projects fair share of public utilities, infrastructure
Verification of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
demand from the
and improvements required to properly service the
receipt of
issuance of grading
project on utility
proposed uses shall be determined through
financial
permit
systems could
consultation with the City Department of Public Works
security
result in potential
and paid prior to the issuance of grading permits.
instrument.
impacts
Aesthetics
The project area is
Landscape designs and materials that complement the
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
adjacent to a scenic
native desert environment shall be utilized in project
landscape and
issuance of grading
area. Development
design and construction.
design plans
permit
would alter the
aesthetic nature of
the area
Overhead utility lines shall be undergrounded to the
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
greatest extent possible through the establishment of
design and
Public Works and
issuance of grading
an undergrounding program and guidelines subject to
site plans
City Engineer
permit
the review of the City Engineer and Public Works
Department.
Signage shall be limited to the locations, sizes, and
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
maintenance requirements necessary to provide
design plan
issuance of grading
functional identification.
permit
-11-
Env.
Issue
Area
Potential
Env. Impact
Mitigation Measure
Method of
Review
Verification
Responsible
Agency
Monitoring
Milestone
Verification of
Compliance
Initial I Date I Remarks
Safe, convenient vehicular and pedestrian circulation,
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
screened outdoor storage/loading and other unsightly
landscape and
issuance of
areas, protected and enhanced outdoor seating areas,
design plans
building permit
appropriate lighting levels, limited signage, and
landscaping designs that preserve and enhance visual
resources shall be included in the design of any
commercial area on the Project Site.
Development proposed along designated scenic
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
highways, roadways and corridors shall be reviewed for
landscape and
issuance of grading
compatibility with the natural and built environments
design plans
permit
to assure maximum viewshed protection and
pedestrian and vehicular activity.
All grading and development proposed within scenic
Review of
City of La Quinta
Prior to the
viewsheds, shall be regulated to minimize adverse
landscape and
issuance of grading
impacts to these viewsheds. All grading, development
design plans
permit
and landscaping plans shall be submitted to the City for
review and approval prior to the issuance of grading
permits.
The project would
Outdoor lighting shall be limited to the minimum
Review of
City of La Quinta,
Prior to the
introduce new
height, number of fixtures, and intensity needed to
design and
Riverside County
issuance of
sources of light and
provide sufficient security and identification in each
site plans
Sheriff
building permit
glare that would
development, making every reasonable effort to
Department
alter the existing
protect the community's night skies.
nighttime
environment
Cultural
There is potential
During any ground altering activities associated with
Verification
City of La Quinta
Prior to issuance of
Resources
for discovery of
project grading or construction, including demolition of
that a
grading permit
unidentified
existing modern structures and facilities, the project
qualified
subsurface cultural
area shall be monitored by a qualified archaeological
historical
resources during
monitor. The monitor shall have the authority to halt
consultant has
future ground
any activities impacting potentially significant cultural
been retained
altering activities
resources until the resources can be evaluated for
significance and cleared or mitigated. The monitoring
program shall also include consultation with the local
Native American representatives (e.g., Torres -Martinez
and/or Morongo Reservations).
-12-