COC 2000-0190 APPLICATION.
-
,
r
�ti
NO. 'APPROVAL
LETTER
ceitti•
44Qdnt &d03]iU
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE:
ITEM TITLE:
January 2, 2001
Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-007
for a New Freestanding Sign for a Historic Commercial
Building Located at the Southwest Corner of Calle
Tampico and Eisenhower Drive Applicant: Jim and
Bruce Cathcart, La Quinta Palms Realty
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the monument sign for Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-007, as
recommended.
•FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On December 21, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the proposed
freestanding sign (Attachment 1). The Commission unanimously approved the sign
with the condition that the clipped corners be deleted and the sign incorporate an arch
in its design.
On November 9, 2000 (Attachment 2), the Historic Preservation Commission
recommended to the City Council approval of the applicant's request to restore the
City identified historic- structure to a condition which enhances its architectural
integrity. The City Council (on Consent Calendar) approved the Certificate of
Appropriateness request on November 21, 2000. One of the requirements was that
the proposed freestanding sign be revised to be lower in profile.
11
Proposed Revision:
The applicants have submitted a revised sign proposal consisting of a rectangular sign
with "clipped corners" on the top and using a white smooth trowel "California Mission"
finish (Attachment 3). The sign is four feet high and six feet wide and eight inches
G:\WPDOCS\cccdiCOA007.wpd
•
thick with an area of approximately 21. square feet. The sign would have their "palm
tree" logo in gold, blue and white at the top, with their name in blue and black, and
address in black: The letters and logo will be made out of an opaque hard foam and
externally illuminated with low voltage landscape lighting.
The sign will be placed in the lawn area perpendicular to Eisenhower Drive. The large
palm tree near the sign will be removed. Although not shown with a planter, a small
planter with a short (six inches) high wall may be provided. If a planter is used, the
overall height of the sign will remain at four feet.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 7.08.030, •the request can be approved if it is
determined:
1. That the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely
affect any architectural or landscape improvement.
RESPONSE: The proposed sign is in keeping with the architectural character of
the original features of the building. The proposed freestanding
masonry sign will replace a modern freestanding wood sign near
the northeast corner of the lot facing Eisenhower Drive. Under
Chapter 9.160 (Signs) of the Municipal Code, because this
business does not have at least 200 feet of street frontage on
Eisenhower Drive it is not allowed a freestanding sign. The
building was constructed as a residence and, as such, was not
designed to accommodate a building sign. Municipal Code Section
9.65.030 (Commercial Village District) allows City identified
historic structures to deviate from Chapter 9.160 sign
requirements as a part of the Certificate of Appropriateness
process. The design of the proposed masonry sign conforms to
the architecture of the building.
2. If the owner of the designated historic site or landmark demonstrates that such -
property cannot be economically used and denial of a permit would deprive the
owner of all or most of his economic interest in the property, the City Council
may issue the permit with an effective date 180 days from the issuance of the
permit to allow time for the investigation of alternatives to the work proposed
in the permit application, such as acquisition of the site improvement by the
City or a public interest group.
RESPONSE: The proposed revisions to the sign is in keeping with the character
defining features of the building and will be beneficial to the
property owner as well as the City.
002
G:\WPDOCS\cccdiCOA007.wpd
• •
In the case of construction of a new improvement upon a historic site, that the
exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the •external appearance of existing historically designated improvements
on said site.
RESPONSE: No new construction is proposed to the existing building.
That the applicant has presented clear and convincing evidence of facts
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City Council that such disapproval will
impose immediate and substantial hardship on the applicant because of
conditions peculiar to the person seeking to carry out the work, whether this be
property owner, tenant, or resident, or because of conditions peculiar to the
particular improvement, or other feature involved, and that approval of the
application will be consistent with the purposes of the permit procedures.
RESPONSE: The applicant has shown that the revision to the sign will improve
the appearance of the buikiing, and ,the applicant has shown a
desire to retain the architectural integrity of the structure.
Alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve the monument sign for Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-007, as
recommended; or
2. Do not approve the monument sign for Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-
007; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
y Her :n
munity Development Director
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachments:
1. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes for December 21, 2000
2. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes for November 9, 2000
3. Sign plan
G:\WPDOCS\cccdiCOA007.wod
003
•
DATE:
ITEM:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
APPLICANTS:
BACKGROUND:
HISTORIC .PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
fj`Fc0,0`
DECEMBER 21, 2000
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2000-007
NEW FREESTANDING SIGN FOR A . HISTORIC
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO AND
EISENHOWER DRIVE (51001 EISENHOWER DRIVE)
BRUCE AND JIM CATHCART (LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY)
On November 9, 2000, The Historic Preservation Commission recommended to the
City Council approval of the applicants request to restore the City identified historic
structure to a condition which enhances its architectural integrity. The City Council
approved the Certificate of Appropriateness request on November 21, 2000. One of
the requirements was that the proposed freestanding sign be revised to be lower in
profile.
PROPOSED REVISIONS:
The applicants have submitted a revised sign proposal consisting of a rectangular sign
with "clipped corners" on the top and using a white smooth trowel "California
Mission" finish. The sign is four feet high and six feet wide and eight inches thick
with an area of approximately 21 square feet. The sign would have their "palm tree"
logo in gold, blue and white at the top, with their name in blue and black, and address
in black. The letters and, logo will be made out of an opaque hard foam and externally
illuminated with low voltage landscape lighting.
•
The sign will be placed in the lawn area perpendicular to Eisenhower Drive. The large
palm tree near the sign will be removed. Although not shown with a planter, a small
planter with a short (six inches) high one may be provided. If a planter is used, the
overall height of the sign will remain at four feet.
DISCUSSION:
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 7.08.030, ,the request can be approved if, and
only if it is determined:
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-007 sign cathcart.wpd
1. That the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely
affect any architectural or landscape improvement.
RESPONSE: The proposed sign is in keeping with the architectural character of
the original features of the building. The proposed freestanding
masonry sign will replace a modern freestanding wood sign near
the northeast corner of the lot facing Eisenhower Drive. Under
Chapter 9.160 (Signs) of the Municipal Code, because this
business does 'not have at least 200 feet of street frontage on
Eisenhower Drive it is not allowed a freestanding sign. The
building was .constructed as a residence and, as such, was not
designed to accommodate a building sign. Municipal Code Section
9.65.030 (Commercial Village District) allows City identified
historic structures to deviate from Chapter. 9.160 sign
requirements as a part of the Certificate of Appropriateness
process. The design of the proposed masonry sign conforms to.
the architecture of the building and will maintain the architectural
integrity ofthe building.
2.. If the ownerpof the designated historic site or landmark demonstrates that such
property cannot be economically used and denial of -a permit would deprive the
owner of all or most of his economic interest in the property, the City. Council
may issue the permit with an effective date 180 days from the issuance of the
permit to allow time for the investigation of alternatives to the work proposed
in the permit application, such as acquisition of the site improvement by the ,
City or a public interest group.
RESPONSE: The proposed revisions to the sign is in keeping with the character
defining features of the building and be beneficial to the property
owner as well as the City.
3. In the case of construction of a new improvement upon a historic site, that the
exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the external appearance of existing historically designated improvements
on said site.
{
RESPONSE: No new construction is proposed to the existing building.
4. That the applicant has presented clear and convincing evidence of - facts
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City. Council that such disapproval will
impose immediate . and substantial hardship ' on the applicant because of
conditions peculiar to the person seeking to carry out the work, whether this be
property owner, tenant, or' resident, or because of conditions peculiar to the
particular improvement, or other feature, involved, and that approval of the
application will be consistent with the purposes of the permit procedures.
p:\stan\hpc'rpt ca 2000-007 sign cathcart.wpd
•
RESPONSE: The applicant has shown that the revision to the sign will improve
the appearance of the building, and the applicant has shown a
desire to retain the architectural integrity of the structure.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2000-, recommending approval of the requested revision to
the sign.
Attachment:
1. Proposed sign exhibits
Prepared by:
I23
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Submitted by:
Planning Manager
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-007 sign cathcart.wpd
3
Colon o�
Cv`S m er c-ejL4L5 -
. ......................... .....
�I
MIO'"l }lrfa<
J"
ILL
I, a
S I - S O 1 H 13 2 1I D0 V. @8►. t at
. -
34166.6 Lau-
D\
Gui
! ell +
lrbri .4leir Nsh��Al�/if�Aagar.
d�i
Owe AW4EMU aa.alai ale 1.ffibbawl
I
ivwada. .lft.sma
Foa/..-841516r5 4 I-cico
1
•
•
�athi
�w FILEC4tP)$
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE:
ITEM TITLE:
November 21, 2000
Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-007
to Allow Restoration of a Historic Commercial
Building Located at 51001 Eisenhower Drive.
Applicants: Bruce and Jim Cathcart (La Quinta Palms
Realty)
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: X
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-007, subject to Findings and Condition
of Approval.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Building Description
The historic structure is identified in the City's Historic Survey and located on the
southwest corner of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Estado. It was originally constructed
as a residential "casitas" in 1938 and converted to a real estate sales office in the early
1970's. The building is a one story stucco clad Spanish Colonial Revival style
structure featuring a side gabled, low pitch tile roof. The roof extends out over the
front of the building creating a covered porch. A southwest style addition has been
added at the back of the building. The building has been maintained over the years,
with work including a new tile roof, which has modified the original appearance of the
building.
The applicants have applied for. a Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP)
grant to help pay for the proposed improvements. Their application for the grant was
processed through the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee at its meeting
of October 4, 2000, and received adequate points to qualify for a grant (Attachment
1).
P:\STAN\coa 2000-007 cc rpt.wpd
Proposed Restoration
The applicants are proposing to restore the building thereby enhancing its architectural
integrity (Attachment 2). This includes re -stuccoing the exterior walls with a white
smooth trowel "California Mission" finish, replacing the concrete tile roof with a
mudded two piece clay tile roof, repainting the Tight colored wood trim dark brown,
replacing three porch posts, restoring the painted door to its original brown finish, and
refinishing the wood frame windows with a dark brown finish. The painted concrete.
patio entry will be covered with sautillo tiles.
In the front yard, the existing freestanding wood sign and railroad tie planters at the
northeast corner of the lot will be removed and replaced with an integrated masonry
monument sign and planter. The sign and short planter will be finished with the
building stucco finish and capped with red brick. The remaining railroad tie planters
in the yard will be replaced with matching short walls.
Discussion
Pursuant to the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code Section 7.08.030, the request
can be approved if, and only if it is determined:
1. That the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely
affect any architectural or landscape improvement.
RESPONSE: The proposed design modifications are in keeping with the
architectural character of the original features of the building. The
proposed freestanding masonry sign will replace a modern
freestanding wood sign near the northeast corner of the lot facing
Eisenhower Drive. Under Chapter 9.160 (Signs) of the Municipal
Code, because this business does not have at least 200 feet of
street frontage on Eisenhower Drive it is not allowed a
freestanding sign. The building was constructed as a residence
and, as such, was not designed to accommodate a building sign.
Municipal Code Section 9.65.030 (Commercial Village District)
allows City identified historic structures to deviate from Chapter
9.160 sign requirements as a part of the Certificate of
Appropriateness process. The design and scale of the proposed
masonry sign as conditioned will conform to the architectural
integrity and scale of the building.
2. If the owner of the designated historic site or landmark demonstrates that such
property cannot be economically used and denial of a permit would deprive the
owner of all or most of his economic interest in the property, the City Council
- 002
P:\STAN\coa 2000-007 cc rpt.wpd
• •
may issue the permit with an effective date 180 days from the issuance of the
permit to allow time for the investigation of alternatives to the work proposed
in the permit application, such as acquisition of the site improvement by the
City or a public interest group.
RESPONSE: The proposed revisions to the building are in keeping with the
character defining features of the building and would be beneficial
to the property owner as well as the City.
3. In the case of construction of a new improvement upon a historic site, that the
exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the external appearance of existing historically designated improvements
on said site.
RESPONSE: No new construction is proposed to the existing building.
4. That the applicant has presented clear and convincing evidence of facts
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City Council that such disapproval will
impose immediate and substantial hardship on the applicant because of
conditions peculiar to the person seeking to carry out the work, whether this be
property owner, tenant, or resident, or because of conditions peculiar to the
particular improvement, or other feature involved, and that approval of the
application will be consistent with the purposes of the permit procedures.
RESPONSE: The applicant has shown that the revision to the building will
improve the appearance of the building, and the applicant has
shown a desire to retain the architectural integrity of the structure.
Historic Preservation Commission Review
The Historic Preservation Commission considered this request at its meeting of
November 9, 2000, and adopted Minute Motion 2000-029 on a 4-0 vote,
recommending approval, subject to the following condition:
1. The freestanding sign shall be redesigned to provide a lower profile sign. The
sign shall be submitted to the HPC for approval.
The Historic Preservation Commission meeting minutes for November 9, 2000, are
attached (Attachment 3).
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The.findings necessary to approve this request can be made as noted above.
003
P:\STAN\coa 2000-007 cc rpt.wpd
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-007, subject to the attached
Findings and Condition of Approval; or
2. Do not approve Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-007; or
3. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
ry Her
muni y Development Director
Approved forsubmission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachments:
1. Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee minutes for the meeting of
October 4, 2000
2. Plan exhibits
3. Historic Preservation Commission minutes for the meeting of November 9, 2000
P:\STAN\coa 2000-007 cc rpt.wpd
14
•
ATTACHMENTS
•
OATTACHMENT 1
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
October 4, 2000 .10:00 a.m.
CALL TO ORDER
A. This meeting of the Archite ural and Landscaping Committee was called
to order at 10: a.m.. by r incipal Planner Stan Sawa who led the flag
salute.
B. Committee Members esent: Bill Bobbitt, Dennis Cunningham, and Frank
Reynolds.
C. Staff present: As tant City Manager Mark Weiss, Management Analyst
Britt Wilson, Pri !pal Planner Stan Sawa and Executive Secretary Betty
Sawyer.
II.PUBLIC COMMEN None.
III. CONFIRMATI. OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed
IV. CONSENT ' ALENDAR:
A. P incipal Planner Stan Sawa asked if there were any changes to the
mutes of September 13, 2000. There being no corrections, it was
moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to
e the s - - submitted.
. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2000-001; a request of
Bruce Cathcart and Jim Cathcart, La Quinta Palms Realty for review of
a funding request to restore the existing wall texture, roof, wood trim,
planters and patio entrance.
1. Management Analyst Britt Wilson presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
1305
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC10-4-00.wpd 1
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
2. Committee Member Cunningham confirmed the grant was for up
to $.15,000 and that this project will cost more than that figure.
Mr. Cathcart stated that was correct. Committee Member
Cunningham stated this was a step in the right direction
considering we have our historical look being the La Quinta Hotel
and this building is a good representation even in its existing
condition. With the proposed improvements it will bring it even
more into conformance with the look of of the Hotel.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if Community Development
Department had reviewed the plans and what was the process in
regard to the approvals. Staff stated the project is submitted to
this ,Committee for approval of the funding and then it will go
through the normal processing procedure. Committee Member
Bobbitt stated his only concerns are to see that it will be approved
by staff. He enjoys the downtown look and this building is
attractive and with the mud tile it will only enhance the look. This
is the look he would like to see more of in the Village. The other
buildings downtown are not this style. He asked staff if they will
be encourage to change their facade. Management Analyst Britt
Wilson stated that in relation to the CPIP, when the Agency Board
adopted it they wanted it to be consistent with the Village
Guidelines. If the project does not conform to the Guidelines, it
might not score as high.
4. Committee Member Cunningham stated that In this case the
project will cost more than the grant and as the applicant is
matching the funds, it is good business.
5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked how the City determines what
percentage of the amount requested, the applicant will receive.
Staff stated the applicant is required to do a 10% match and the
City will go up to $ 15,000. This is a rebate program. The
applicant receives the money after the work is completed.
Committee Member Bobbitt stated his concern that an applicant
could submit an inflated bid to get the extra .money. Staff stated
it is a rebate program and they must show clear evidence that the
money was spent. The process runs so that the applicant can
receive an approval on the grant and .then go through the City's
permit process to do the work. Staff is requesting this Committee
to score the project and make a recommendation as to the amount
that should be granted. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that
without a full set of plans it is hard to determine what the
applicant is doing. •
•_ t
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC 10-4-00.wpd 2
'UN
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
6. Committee Member Reynolds stated it is a good idea as it is in a
conspicuous location in the City.
7. Committee Member Cunningham reviewed the proposed changes
with Mr. Cathcart, the applicant.
8. Management Analyst Britt Wilson asked how the Committee
Members wanted to determine the scoring. Committee Member
Bobbitt stated he would prefer an open discussion on each of the
point. areas.
9. Committee Member Cunningham stated they need to look at what
is viewed by the public eye. Staff stated the idea of the grant is
to see something from the street scene. Discussion followed as
to the criteria the funds could be used for and how the applicant
would be held accountable to be sure they complete the work as
it was submitted.
10. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what the process will be once
it passes this Committee. Staff stated it will depend upon the
applications they will need to submit for the planning approval
process. Committee Member Bobbit stated that if the landscaping
is part of the applicant, he would like it to come back to the ALRC.
Staff stated it would be up to the Community Development
Department to determine :he process after the CPIP approval.
Committee Member Bobbitt stated that if the applicant wanted to
do just landscaping whicl- normally would not need Planning
approval, what will keep the applicant from putting something in
that was not attractive. Staff stated that if it is significant new
landscaping it will be brought back to the ALRC.
11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion
2000-018 recommending approval of Commercial Property
Improvement Program 2000-001 with a rating score of 89 and
dollar amount of $15,000. Unanimously approved.
rcial. 'ro. ert 1 . rove e P . • ram 2000-002; a request of
vid Cetina, ' anchito Mexican Restaurant for review of a funding
req• -st to construct a front patio cover and new concrete.
1. Man. 'ement Analyst Britt Wilson presented the information
contain in the staff repo-t, a copy of which is on file in the
Community ; -velopment Department.
007
—__..___._‘uronnrcw nrin_e_nn.,,.,,l
3
•
• ATTACHMENT 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The goal of this project is to restore the building located at 51-001
Eisenhower Dr., La Quinta, CA. to its original, historic colors, textures and roof
design, . and to replace the existing sign and railroad tie planters with a more
traditional style masonry monument sign and masonry garden walls capped with
red brick.
To restore the exterior of the building to its original "texture" will require
the entire exterior of the building be re -stuccoed with a white, smooth California
Mission finish. The existing concrete tile roof will be replaced with an historic La
Quinta Mission 2 piece / mortar roof and the existing wood trim will be repainted
from its current light beige to a rich dark brown. Prior to painting, three large
posts will be replaced and the original plank wood door will be "restored" by
sanding, patching and filling, and refinishing. Additionally, the original single pane
wood framed windows will be "restored" by sanding, patching and filling, reglazing,
and refinishing with a dark brown finish. Finally, the covered entry (patio) floor,
currently just painted concrete, will be covered in super Sautillo tiles.
The existing sign and railroad tie planters will be removed. A new masonry
monument sign and masonry wall planter, though slightly smaller, will be
reinstalled in the same location as the original sign. Both the sign and planter will
be finished with the white, smooth Mission finish and capped with red brick. The
remaining railroad ties currently used as planters and borders will also be replaced
with matching white, masonry garden walls also capped with red bricks and the
northern most planter will be similarly bordered.
nO
� ATTACHMENT 3
Excerpt from Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 9, 2000
B. Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-007: Request for restoration of a
historic commercial building; located at the southwest corner of Calle
Tampico and Eisenhower Drive .(51001 EisenhowerDrive).
1.. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the staff report, a .copy: of
which is on file in the Community,Development Department.
2.•- ; Commissioner Sharp thought th, plan wasta.•nice'$improvement but
was concerned about the redcap brickand its authenticityHe
also questioned the proportions of the sign as it affects°therwhole
Er—
izo
project. He suggested reducing the eight of the sign'. He then
asked what the sign matErials`wereA and if the letters were hand
painted, He also asked if the s gn would be illuminated.
s �
Principal Planner Sawa replied it was€painted . with no lighting ;
shown on the plans _w.:
Commissioner
illuminated sign
carp then ask
'.'Planning Manager
Of •
;illumination.
City would allow an
brio reel ed that it depended on the type of
Commissioner Sher, Staled the appropriateness of the design was
good but acondition should be added regarding illumination.
anning'Manat
mger di-loria said that could be added if it was the
'mission's recommendation.
Cofmmissoner Irwin commented she went to the building to look
at how large the present wood sign was.. She couldn't determine
iN
the size but felt with tha height of the planter and the sign's
present size it was' very large in proportion to the building. The
other improvements they, were making were going to take the
building right back to wha _ it originally was. Heronly concern was ..
the size of the sign:
'Commissioner Sharp tasked if there was some way the
Commission could see a scaled drawing or plot plan of the whole
project, including the sign. to ,get a sense of the scale of the sign.
P: CAROLYN\Cathcart HPC.wpd
10. Commissioner Irwin added the City had standards on signs and
their size. She added the veterinary sign doesn't overpower the
historic building. This building is smaller with a very large sign and
doesn't preserve the historic aspect of the building.
11. Planning Manager di lorio commented the Code measures signs
height from the nearest curb and the Commission<ould ask it be
measured that way to regulate the heightCof thesign.
12. Commissioner Irwin wasn't in favor of tellin the: a licant what
��_� ,��,�' g,� .. PPS �:;
size their sign should be, but .was concerned tlatthis,,beautiful
historic building could be overpowered by a sign.\ _ f,.
13. Planning Manager di lorio responded the City Regulations in the
Zoning Code allows historicAbuildmg,igns flexibility due to the
architecturally sensitivity of the project Monument signs aren't
allowed for buildings withlesstnhan 200feet offrontage and there
would have to be a ndingfb' he Comrnission that having a
building mounted sign would'infnngeonn,�the architectural integrity
of the historic structure A�lso.,sthe Code specifies the maximum
square footag& size and;height for;.rnonument signs. She added
when the Planning Commission -approves a sign they look at the
proposed sign and how it relates to the site if the maximum is too
high the Commiss on!mayyrequire a reduction in size and height.
She suggested the Commission approve the project and ask for the
applicant°to come back with a more appropriate sign.
CommissionerSharp commented he was having difficulty
envisioning th cale of the sign from the sketches provided and
asked\of it was possible to see a scaled drawing.
7k a
15. Commissioner Irwin responded she would be inclined to approve
the) project with the exception of the sign and have that brought
rl
back to make a decision on the appropriateness of the sign.
16./'`Vice Chairman Puente asked if the Commissioners would like to
have a scaled drawing.
17. Planning Manager di lorio said the condition could be added
recommending approval of the requested revision to the building
subject to the following condition:
P:\CAROLYN\Cathcart HPC.wpd
010
Manager di lorio if the
final design of the sign would go before thePlanning Commission.
Planning Manager di.lorio answered thelway the Code reads the
Certificate of Appropriate ss E`would be reviewed by_the HPC and
3.'t xIx kp«L
e t' rv�.;;�
Commissioner Irwin , sked if the project would be going back
through they Architecture and/Landscaping Review Committee
(ALRC).
Unanimously approved.
Councilmernber Don Adolph askedP
the Council
"That a scaled drawing of the monument sign, including .,the
• elevations, be submitted tD the Historic Preservation Commission
for approval." ;.
18.There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Sharp/Irwin to adopt. Minute -Motion 2000-027
recommendingroval of. Certificate of -A"
a Rp ppropnateness 2000-
007; with the following condition added._
"That a`scaled drawing ofthemonument sgn, including the
elevations, be submitted to theAHistoricPreservation-
ar ..•`=€'�F.' t'ai a° k:.�^ fin ` k€::fn.. fx(a +'-
Commission for approval."
Planning Manager di lorio said no. The applicant would be able to
get their permits to do the modification as soon as Council made
a decision ate their November 21 St meeting: : She also told the
Commission the applicant has already received funding'
`ecru ' .
� aliffvication'approval through the ALRC.
P:\CAROLYMCathcart HPC.wpd
ATTACHMENT 1
•
•
6
I 4.
v9
T
:9
1-;
d
00
x
0o
012
cs
I�.
;
d
'3
-z
va
gza oa
{r;Itor.•
11
0
•
— Q 4
•
••••••
-t•-•
'•••
Cr5 •
ezt —t„
• .4N .
r...;.% •
41:
ctF•
1.407
64—
,
11%
."-"*2'•••••
•
',....% 4,, •'. .-- ':.;.<•4•:. , . ..., ...: / •:,,.....\
,4":,,,•=".,:-'-1(-411‘ f!%:-,..vreyt.5; •
.`t":4,.. \ : : / ,.•.,N .
\ .
••''' Pr-,
.,' ,
--A
- • 014
• •
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Existing building to be
re -textured with white,
smooth mission finished
stucco walls
La Quinta Hotel —
Example of white,
smooth mission finished
stucco walls
011
• •
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Existing building with
modern concrete tile roof
and light colored wood
trim
itateelissat
La Quinta Hotel —
Example of original
historic Mission La
Quinta two piece mortar
roof and dark brown
wood trim to replace
existing roof and trim
color
•
•1'711111riaalrallaNOMIVINMInarti`if-t,;iy.f.,r7.
ECOPN
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 2000
ITEM: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2000-007
REQUEST: RESTORATION OF A HISTORIC COMMERCIAL BUILDING
LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO AND
• EISENHOWER DRIVE (51001 EISENHOWER DRIVE)
APPLICANTS: BRUCE AND JIM CATHCART (LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY)
BACKGROUND:
The identified historic structure was originally constructed as a residential "casitas" in
1938 and converted to a real estate sales office in'the early .1970's. The building is
a one story stucco clad Spanish Colonial Revival style structure featuring a side gabled,
low pitch tile roof. The roof extends out over the front of the building creating a
covered porch. A southwest style addition has been added at the back of the building'.
The building has been maintained over the years, with work including a new tile roof,
which has modified the original appearance of the building.
The applicants have applied for a Commercial Property ImprovementProgram (CPIP)
grant to help pay for the proposed improvements. Their application for the grant is
presently being processed through the Architectural and Landscaping Review
Committee. •
PROPOSED REVISIONS: •
i
The applicants are proposing to restore the building thereby enhancing its architectural
integrity (Attachment.1). This includes re -stuccoing the exterior walls with a white
smooth trowel "California Mission" finish, replacing the concrete tile roof with a
mudded two piece clay tile roof, repainting the light colored wood trim dark brown,
replacing three porch posts, restoring the painted door to its original finish, and
refinishing the wood frame windows with a dark brown finish. The painted concrete
patio entry will be covered with sautillo tiles.
In the front yard the existing freestanding wood sign and railroad tie planters will be
removed and replaced With an integrated masonry monument sign and planter. The
sign and short planter will be finished with the building stucco finish and capped with
red brick. The remaining railroad tie planters in the yard will be replaced with matching
short walls.
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-007 cathcart.wpd
N
<4.
DISCUSSION: .
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 7.08.030, the request can be approved if, and •
only if it is determined:
1. That 'the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely
affect any architectural or landscape improvement.
RESPONSE: The proposed design modifications are in keeping with the
architectural character of the Original features of the building. The
proposed freestanding masonry sign will replace a modern
freestanding wood sign near the northeast corner of the lot facing
Eisenhower Drive. Under Chapter 9.160 (Signs) of the Municipal
Code, because this business does not have at least 200 feet of
street frontage on Eisenhower Drive it is not . allowed a
freestanding sign. The building was constructed as a residence
and, as such, was not designed to accommodate a building sign.
Municipal Code Section 9.65.030 (Commercial Village District)
allows City identified historic structures to deviate from Chapter
9.160 sign requirements as a part of the Certificate of
Appropriateness process. The design of the proposed masonry
sign conforms to the architecture of the building and will maintain
the architectural integrity of the building with a building mounted
sign.
2. If the owner of the designated historic site or landmark demonstrates that such
property cannot be economically used and denial of a permit would deprive the
owner of all or most of his economic interest in the property, the City Council
may issue the permit with an effective date,180 days from the issuance of the
permit to allow time for the investigation of alternatives to the work proposed
in the permit application, such as acquisition of the site improvement by the
City or a public interest group.
RESPONSE: The proposed revisions to the building are in keeping with the
character defining features of the building and be beneficial to the
property owner as well as the City.
3. In the case of construction of a new improvement upon a historic site, that the
exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the external appearance of 'existing historically designated improvements
on said site.
RESPONSE: No new construction is proposed to the existing building.
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-007 cathcart.wpd
•
•
4. That the applicant has' ,presented clear and convincing evidence of facts
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City Council that such disapproval will
impose immediate and substantial hardship on the applicant because of
conditions peculiar to the person seeking to carry out the work, whether this be
property owner, tenant, or resident, or because of conditions peculiar to the
particular improvement, or other feature involved, and that approval of the
application will be consistent with the purposes of the permit procedures.
RESPONSE: The applicant has shown that the revision to the building will
improve the appearance of the building, and the applicant has
shown a desire to retain the architectural integrity of the structure.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2000-_, recommending approval ofthe requested revision to
the building. 3,
Attachment:
1. Proposed plan exhibits
Prepared by:
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Submitted by:
IcC{a,co
Christine di. Iorio, ; Planing Manager
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-007 cathcart.wpd
•
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The goal of this project is to restore the building located at 51-001
Eisenhower Dr., La Quinta, CA. to its original, historic colors, textures and roof
design, and to replace the existing sign and railroad tie planters with a more
traditional style masonry monument sign and masonry garden walls capped with
red brick.
To restore the exterior of the building to its original "texture" will require
the entire exterior of the building be re -stuccoed with a white, smooth California
Mission finish. The existing concrete tile roof will be replaced with an historic La
Quinta Mission 2 piece / mortar roof and the existing wood trim will be repainted
from its current light beige to a rich dark brown. Prior to painting, three large
posts will be replaced and the original plank wood door will be "restored" by
sanding, patching and filling, and refinishing. Additionally, the original single pane
wood framed windows will be "restored" by sanding, patching and filling, reglazing,
and refinishing with a dark brown finish. Finally, the covered entry (patio) floor,
currently just painted concrete, will be covered in super Sautillo tiles.
The existing sign and railroad tie planters will be removed. A new masonry
monument sign and masonry wall planter, though slightly smaller, will be
reinstalled in the same location as the original sign. Both the sign and planter will
be finished with the white, smooth Mission finish and capped with red brick. The
remaining railroad ties currently used as planters and borders will also be replaced
with matching white, masonry garden walls also capped with red bricks and the
northern most planter will be similarly bordered.
•
(.1)
grt,
0 •
(ki,foeborl Mood)
51-001 eASE A/kowe Dit. LQ
,-ez•
AO: Re 57-vce o
LetoDalt, rribi.ALS
(4.1'1 boo k
N kw SiAtv -t
Sag_ a4
, •
• • •7,7;-•
! I !
•
•
4
- ��1+
-e w
%
-ril. a :, ..: -,.. ':; i .
x3 i
J FY� ,j��, S
'�- "k \\,.t' III �. _._ ;�
•
Z.
Z.
7.
•
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Existing building to be
re -textured with white,
smooth mission finished
stucco walls
La Quinta Hotel —
Example of white,
smooth mission finished
stucco walls
•CITY OF LA QUINTA•
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Existing building with
modern concrete tile roof
and light colored wood
trim
La Quinta Hotel —
Example of original
historic Mission La
Quinta two piece mortar
roof and dark brown
wood trim to replace
existing roof and trim
color
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2000
CASE NO.: N.A.
APPLICANT: BRUCE CATHCART, JIM CATHCART
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
REQUEST: FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM 0
LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF EISENHOWER AT TERMINUS OF CALLE TAMPICO
(51-001 EISENHOWER DRIVE)
BACKGROUND:
As the ALRC is aware, the City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (RDA) has
established a Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) :to facilitate the
economic and aesthetic improvement of commercial properties within Redevelopment
Project Area No. 1. The attached program description further delineates the program's
goals and procedures (Attachment 1).
The RDA began accepting CPIP applications on September 1.1, 2000. Staff has
received seven (7) submittals as of this writing. The application submitted by La
Quinta Palms Realty (Jim and Bruce Cathcart) is one of two that have been deemed
complete at this time (Attachment 2). The proposal, as represented in the application,
is to "restore existing wall texture, roof, wood trim, planters and patio entrance to
original La Quinta Hotel style including sign." More specifically, the applicant proposes
to re -stucco the exterior walls with California Mission finish, replace concrete roof tiles
with an historic La Quinta Mission mortar roof, replace vertical posts supporting front
shade structure, restore plank door and wood sash windows, cover front sidewalk with
Sautillo tiles, and erect a new masonry monument sign and garden walls.
As may be recalled, the ALRC is responsible for evaluating the application, sketches,
and plans based on the funding criteria. It should also be pointed out, however, that
the CPIP determining process is separate from any required planning approvals.
Therefore, although the ALRC may determine a project is eligible for funds, the
applicant may have to process additional planning applications as required by City
codes (e.g. a sign permit) before funding is actually awarded.
• •
Because the CPIP encourages the incorporation. of design elements from The Vi//age
at La Quinta: Design Guidelines , a copy of those guidelines is attached for use by the
ALRC (Attachment 3).
In accordance with the parameters of the program, the ALRC is being asked to score
the Cathcart's application. A. minimum score of 70 is required to be eligible for
funding. A copy of a brochure created to provide guidelines on the CPIP, including the
Funding Criteria, is attached which outlines the funding determination process
(Attachment 4). To facilitate scoring of the application, staff has prepared a Funding
Criteria worksheet for use by the ALRC (Attachment 5). The ALRC may wish to
consider having each member score the application then taking the average to
determine if the applicant receives the minimum 70 point score to be considered for
funding. Alternatively, the ALRC could arrive at a consensus score among all the
members. •
If approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the Community
Development Department for identification of appropriate planning approvals, if any.
After receiving all appropriate City approvals, the. La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
will enter into a rebate agreement with the applicant.
The applicant has been made aware of this meeting and has indicated that one or more
persons will be present at the October 4th ALRC meeting.
Prepared and submitted by:
Britt W. Wilson, Management Analyst
City Manager's Office
Attachments:
1. La Quinta RDA Commercial Property Improvement Program
CPIP application; Bruce/Jim Carthcart, La Quinta Palms Realty
3. The Village at La Quinta: Design Guidelines
4. CPIP Brochure including Funding Criteria section
5. Funding Criteria worksheet
G:\MyData\WPDocs\CPIP\ALRCSTAFFREPORTCATHCART 10-04-00.wpd
00
i •
} ATTACHMENT 1
LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ADOPTED BY THE
LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ON.
MAY 16, 2000
003
•
• ATTACHMENT °I
LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COMMERCIAL 'PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PURPOSE
In order to encourage business enterprises to enhance the economic and aesthetic
potential of their property, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (Agency) has
established a Commercial Property Improvement Program (Program). Program
objectives include:
The rehabilitation of commercialstructures to enhance aesthetics, restore historic
features, and extend a building's economic life, and;
• Offsetting building improvement costs to facilitate the efforts of creating and
expanding business enterprises.
Grants of up to $15,000 may be available to eligible tenants and business/commercial
property owners. These grants may fund building improvements including new facades,
signs, painting, lighting, parking, and landscaping.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
Commercial property owner and tenants within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area
No. 1 are eligible to apply. If the applicant is a tenant, the property owner must provide
written authorization for Program participation.
ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
Grantsmay fund engineering and architectural design, permits and fees, and exterior
improvement construction costs. Eligible, construction elements include:
Exterior Facade Improvements - Reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs,
awnings/canopies, exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, and decorative roof
treatments to the entrance and visible sides of the building. Exterior facade
improvements will require the removal of old, obsolete, and/or non -conforming signs.
Site Improvements. - Reconstruction and/or expansion of parking lots, sidewalks,
landscaping and irrigation systems, exterior lighting, and other improvements that
enhance the property's general appearance.
Demolition - Removal of structurally unsound or non -conforming structures.
Other Improvements - Electrical and plumbing system upgrades may also qualify when
directly associated with facade. improvements. Agency staff will determine the eligibility
of other capital improvements on a case -by -case basis.
Vilfacprog
1 05/10/00
004
• •
A licensed contractor must perform all work for projects costing in excess of $3,000.
For projects costing $3,000 or Tess, the applicant or other personnel may perform the
work. All applicable City permits must be obtained as well as a City business license.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design guidelines for facade improvements may include:
• Enhancing the original features of the building, including significant architectural
details;
• Incorporating colors that complement neighboring buildings;
• Utilizing materials suitable to the building. style;
• Providing exterior accent features to enhance appearance;
• Using appropriate and creative signage, landscaping, and lighting, and;
• . Increasing and/or opening window areas to expose interiors. Care should be
taken to avoid cluttered and poorly designed window treatments.
Properties within the Village of La Quinta are encouraged to incorporate the Village
Design Guidelines design elements.
AVAILABLE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
This Program is funded through a combination of Agency tax increment and City
general fund revenue. Applicants will be approved on a first -come, first -served basis,
with the amount of financial assistance determined by the Agency.
All approved grants will require a 10% funding rnatch.by the applicant. A maximum of
$15,000 will be allocated to any one property in a.given fiscal year.
Approved grant funds may be used to reimburse an applicant for up to $1,000 in
architectural service fees. Subsequent architectural expenses may be matched dollar
for dollar. However, all architectural service costs will be the applicant's responsibility if
the improvements are not constructed per the approved. grant.
PROGRAM STEPS
Applicants seeking grant allocations of $3,000 or less are subject to the following
procedures:
1. The applicant will obtain an application and Program description from the Agency.
Applications are available at the Community Development Department located at
City Hall.
Vilfacprog
2 05/10/00
005
,r.
and current photos of the subject property.
3. City staff will meet with the applicant to discuss Program requirements as they
pertain to their specific needs.
4. The applicant will prepare improvement sketches and preliminary cost estimates; the
sketches should identify materials, colors, and other improvement
recommendations.
5. The City' s Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC) will review and
approve proposed improvements.
6. The applicant will obtain and submit two (2) quotes/bids for materials subject to
reimbursement consideration.
7. The Agency and applicant will sign a Building Improvement Rebate Agreement
outlining the work tote completed. No work shall commence (other than the initial
design sketches) until the applicant submits an executed Rebate Agreement and all
applicable building permits are obtained.
8. The applicant will obtain all applicable building permits. .
9. The applicant is responsible for project implementation. The project must be started
within 90 days from obtaining building permits and be completed within one year
after the execution of the Rebate Agreement.
10. Upon completion, the applicant must submit'photos of the finished project, and proof
of vendor payment and lien releases. City staff will then visit the site to certify
project completion within 15 days after receiving these materials from the applicant.
.11. The applicant will receive the approved grant funding upon verification of project
completion. This will occur within 15 days afterthe site visit and certification of
vendor payments and lien releases.
12. All applicants seeking reimbursement for labor costs must follow the procedures for
projects in excess of $3,000 set forth below irrespective of project cost.
Applicants seeking grant applications greater than $3,000 will be subject to the
following procedures:
1. The applicant will -obtain an application and Program description from the Agency.
Applications are available at the Community Development Department located at
City Hall.
2. The applicant will submit a completed application, project description, and current
photos of the subject property.
Vilfacprog 3' , 05/12/00
006
uuuuuuiiuiuwnuuunmuuuui
•
3. City staff will meet with the applicant to discuss Program requirements as they
pertain to their specific needs.
4: An architect or design professional will prepare improvement sketches and
preliminary cost estimates; the sketches should identify materials, colors, and other
improvement recommendations.
5. The City' s Architecture and Landscaping. Review Committee (ALRC) will review and
approve proposed improvements.
6: If applicable, an architect or design professional will prepare construction drawings.
7. The applicant will obtain three (3) contractor bids. .
8. The applicant will submit theconstruction bids and proof of contractor insurance to
City staff.
9. The Agency and applicant will sign a Building Improvement Rebate Agreement
outlining the work to be completed. No work shall commence (other than the initial
design activities) until the applicant submits an executed Rebate Agreement and the
applicant obtains all applicable building permits.
10. The applicant will obtain all applicable building permits.
11. The applicant is responsible for project implementation. Construction must start
within 90 days from obtaining building permits and be completed within one year
after the execution of the Rebate Agreement.
12. The grant will be funded in three equal payments. Payment of 33% of the total grant
amount will be made when construction commences. A second payment of 33% of
the total grant amount will occur when the project is 50% complete (the Rebate
Agreement will describe this milestone). The third payment will be made upon
project completion and verification of the items presented in #13 and #14 below:
13. Upon completion, the applicant must submit photos of the finished project, and proof
of vendor payment and contractor lien releases. City staff will then visit the site to
certify project completion within 15 days after receiving these materials from the
applicant.
14.The applicant will receive the final progress payment upon verification of project
completion. This will occur within 15 days after the site visit and certification of
vendor payments and construction lien releases.
007
Vilfacprog 4 05/12/00
ATTACHMENT 2
LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM APPLICATION
Submitted by: Bruce and Jim Cathcart / La Quinta Palms Realty
Property address: 51-001 Eisenhower Dr., La Quinta, CA. 92253
Phone / Fax : (760) 564-4104 / (760) 564-0344
Email: LQPalms@aol.com
Submission date: September 11, 2000
Submitted to: The City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
Address: 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253
Phone: (760) 777-7000
Web site: http://www.la-quinta.org
008
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
Commercial Propertylmprovement Program Application -
Applicant Information
Applicant Name: Bruce and Jim Cathcart
Applicant Phone: (760) 564-4104. Applicant.E-Mail: LQPalms@aol . corn
Name of Business: La Quinta Palms Realty
Mailing Address: 51001 Eisenhower Dr. La Quinta, CA. 92253
Business Phone: (760) 564-4104 Business Fax: .(760) 564-0344
Property Owner: Yes: No:
Business Owner: Yes: XXX No:
Project Information ,
Business Location: 51001 Eisenhower Dr. La Quinta, CA. 92253
Type of Business: Real Estate Sales
Project Goals: To restore the historic features and enhance the
aesthetics of the exterior of the structure and replace. existing sign.
Proposed Improvements: Restore existing wall 'texture, roof, wood trim,
planters and patio entrance to original La Quinta Hotel style including sign.
Total Project Cost (please attach cost estimate): In excess of $15 , 000. 00, ( see summary sheet )
Requested Agency Assistance: $15,000.00 Applicant Budget Amount: $1,500.00
Description of Applicant Funding Sources: Cash on hand, Valley. Independent Bank
Proposed Project Duration: 60 Days, work. to commence upon excecution of
Rebate Agreement with the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency.
Attachments
• Two (2) color photographs of the property where improvements will be installed
• Project sketches or plans (based upon funding level)
• Cost estimates
Certification Statements
If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the following certification must be completed
by the property owner: '
, declare under penalty and perjury that I am the owner of
property involved in this application. I acknowledge that only one (1) tenant of the subject property
involved in this application may be awarded program funding in any one (1) given fiscal year. •
Signature: Date:
The following statement must be completed by the applicant and property owner:
I/we acknowledge the filing of this application and certify that all above information is true and correct
to.the best of my/our knowledge and belief. I/we understand that a Building Improvement Rebate
Agreement, must be signed and authorized by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency prior to
commencinany work on the p
Signature'.. s Date: 9/9/00
Signature:
Date: . 9/9/00
009.
INTRODUCTION
The building located at 51-001 Eisenhower Dr., on the corner of Eisenhower
and Tampico', is one of the original "Casitas" built in the 1930's. This casita (or'
"little house"). was converted into a Real Estate Sales office in the early 1970's by
Marie Bellows and has been known as "La Quinta Palms Realty" ever since. Bruce
and Jim Cathcart acquired this property in 1983. Over the years portions of this
building have added onto, updated and "modernized" with everything from new
plumbing, electrical, heating and air conditioning as well as keeping up with the new
styles of lighter colors and exterior design changes. Recognizing this building's
location as one of the officially designated gateways to the Village at La Quinta and
the cove residential area, Bruce and Jim Cathcart have always tried to -present an
attractive and well maintained appearance, not just because it is good for business,
but also in a show civic pride and in hopes of inspiring others to do the same. If
approved for a grant from the City of La Quinta's Redevelopment Agency, the
Cathcarts would like to renovate the exterior facade of "La Quinta Palms Realty"
by restoring the building with its historic features and replacing the existing sign
and planters with a traditional masonry style monument sign and garden walls.
In addition to the completed Program Application, included in this proposal
is a general project description, several current photos of the subject property as it
exists today as well as photos of the proposed improvements taken at the La Quinta
Hotel and other historic landmarks, a Specifications Sheet that was submitted to
three local General Contractors for competitive bids, A Summary Sheet listing the
Contractor's information and Bid Totals, the individual Contractor Estimates
(totals only based upon our spec. sheets), and Proof of Insurance (when not on file
with the City of La Quinta's Building Department), and a drawing of the monument
sign.
010
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The goal of this project is to, restore the building located at 51-001
Eisenhower Dr., La Quinta, CA. to its original, historic colors, textures and roof.
design, and to replace the existing sign and railroad tie planters with a more
traditional style masonry monument sign and masonry garden walls capped with
red brick.
To restore the exterior of the building to its original "texture" will require
the entire exterior of the building be re -stuccoed with a white, smooth California
Mission finish. The existing concrete tile roof will be replaced with an historic La
Quinta Mission 2 piece / mortar roof and the existing wood trim will be repainted
from its current light beige to a rich dark brown. Prior to painting, three large
posts will be replaced and the original plank wood door will be "restored" by
sanding, patching and filling, and refinishing. Additionally, the original single pane
wood framed windows will be "restored" by sanding, patching and filling, reglazing,
and refinishing with a dark brown finish. Finally, the covered entry (patio) floor,
currently just painted concrete, will be covered in super Sautillo tiles.
The existing sign and railroad tie planters will be removed. A new masonry
monument sign and masonry wall planter, though slightly smaller, will be
reinstalled in the same location as the original sign. Both the sign and planter will
be finished with the white, smooth Mission finish and capped with red brick. The
remaining railroad ties currently used as planters and borders will also be replaced
with matchingwhite, masonry garden walls also capped with red bricks and the
northern most planter will be similarly bordered.
011.
PHOTOS
• •
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Current Existing Sign
and planter
Example of masonry
monument sign — shown
for style only, see
drawings and next photo
for proposed design of
new sign and planters
013
• •
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Example of design
features for proposed new
sign include white, smooth
mission finish stucco with
red brick cap. Similarly
designed garden walls will
replace railroad ties in
existing planters shown
below.
Existing railroad tie
planters to be replaced
with white, smooth
mission finish masonry
garden walls with red
brick cap
014
• •
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Existing Patio Entrance
La Quinta Hotel - Example
of proposed tile flooring and dark
brown wood trim (patio ceiling,
posts & beams)
• •
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Existing building to be
re -textured with white,
smooth mission finished
stucco walls
La Quinta Hotel —
Example of white,
smooth mission finished
stucco walls
016
• •
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Existing building with
modern concrete tile roof
and light colored wood
trim
La Quinta Hotel —
Example of original
historic Mission La
Quinta two piece mortar
roof and dark brown
wood trim to replace
existing roof and trim
color
017
• •
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
Existing windows
La Quinta Hotel — Example of retrofit
windows to replace existing windows
with dark brown trim
BID SHEET & WORK SPECIFICATIONS
CONTRACTOR SUMMARY SHEET
CONTRACTOR ESTIMATES/BIDS
019
BID SHEET AND WORK SPECIFICATIONS
1. Re -stucco entire existing building using a smooth, California Mission finish,
Color - Lahabra Products base 100 (white). Include all labor, materials, scaffold,
masking and clean-up.
2. Brown coat and stucco front planter (as built per plan), 55 linear feet of single
course masonry concrete block patio and planter border (two sides) and 48
linear feet of three course masonry concrete block garden wall (one side) using a
smooth, California Mission finish, Color - Lahabra Products base 100 (white).
Include all labor, materials, masking and clean-up.
3. Remove existing roof tile, install one ply 40 Lbs. Felt nailed to sheeting. Stack
new tile and trim on roof, distributing weight evenly. Install ridge boards and
felt over to protect. Install tile to match Old Historic La Quinta two-piece and.
mortar. Include all labor, materials, dumpster, clean-up and a five year
warranty.
4. Remove and replace three 6"X 6"X 6' D.F wood covered entry support posts.
5. Remove existing sign and railroad tie planter box and railroad ties along front
entry border and garden wall. Install masonry concrete block and red brick cap
per plan for new sign and front planter box. Insta11 55 linear feet of single
course 8"X 8"X 16" masonry concrete block and red brick cap along existing
covered entry and planter border. Insta11 48 linear feet of two course 8"X 8"X
16". masonry concrete block and red brick cap along existing patio and planter
border. Include all labor, materials, and clean-up.
6. Remove existing glass from front four windows and restore existing wood frames
by sanding, patching and filling, and refinishing. Reglaze windows with new
glass. Include all labor, materials, and clean-up.
7. Clean, patch and prepare concrete floor at covered front entry. Install
approximately 180 square feet of 12"X 12" Super Sautillo tiles, grout (natural)
and seal. Include all labor, materials, and clean-up.
8. Clean and prepare all wood surfaces for painting. Restore original plank wood
front door by sanding, patching and filling, and prepare for painting. Prime
three new wood entry cover posts and prepare for paint. Paint all exterior wood
surfaces with Glidden Evermore acrylic latex satin paint (or equivalent). Color
to be "Strattford Brown". Include all labor, materials, scaffold, masking and
clean-up.
9. Restore and repair damaged landscaping and irrigation system. Install new
landscaping and irrigation system to front planter. Include all labor, materials,
and clean-up.
020
CONTRACTOR'S SUMMARY .SHEET
Contractor Estimate/Bid
Mumbil Inc.
Bill Howard
License #537333
(760) 340-2726 $16,500.00
Total Construction
Connie Galati
License #655861
(760) 360-8453
Riddell's Home Improvement
Dave Riddell
License #648311
(760) 320-8001
$17,625.00
$17,125.00
0 21.
September 8, 2000,
Bruce and Jim Cathcart
51001 Eisenhower Dr.
La Quinta, CA. 92253
Re: Bid for work at 51001 Eisenhower Dr., La Quinta, CA.
Dear Bruce and Jim,
Thank you for the opportunity to bid the proposed remodel for your office building.
Please consider this letter my formal bid to do the work outlined in your "Bid Sheet and
Work Specifications" a copy of which is attached. This bid is for only the work specified
on your bid sheet and does not include any plans or building permits. These will be an
extra cost and are to be paid by you at the time of their issuance.
My bid to complete all of the attached work is $16,500.00. 0
If this price is acceptable to you, we will execute a contract and agree upon a payment
schedule. We should be able to start work immediately. The Insurance policies that you
requested are already on file with the City of La Quinta. Have them call me if they have
any questions.
Thank you again for the opportunity to bid this work for you.
Sincerely,
4,AAAA,_
Bill Howard
P.O. Box 10758, Palm Desert, CA 92255-0758
Tel (760) 340-2726 _ Fax (760) 568-2776 022
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
73-091 Country Club Drive, Suite A4-2
Palm Desert, CA 92260
(760) 360-8453
(760) 772-0010 FAX
NAME !ADDRESS
i.a fall. ReaIt%
51 DO I Eisenhower Dn ve
i La Quinta, CA 92253
I Attn: Mr. Jim Cathcart
DESCRIPTION
To provide material and labor as per your attached scope of work.
Exclusions:
Permits
Plans
•INote:
All insurance is on•file at the Cite of l.a Quinta.
i General Liuhilit' . Worker's Compensation and Commercial Auto •
It copes are required. 1)11.: c wow i1 . offi:e
We look forward to hearing from you
aND
— -. -.
QTY
RATE
Estimate
DATE , ESTIMATE #
9/8/2000 427
PROJECT
Exterior Office lmproveme... ,
17,625.00
•
TOTAL
TOTAL
17,625.00
S 17,625.00
c
FROM :- RIDDELLS HOME IMPROVE T
PHONE NO. : +760 320 8001
Sep. 08 2000 04:16PM P01
•Ps APPRO�V■D
idle 1 's
le' op HOME IMFIBOVEMENTB SERVICE
TEL: (760) 320 8001
Fax: (760) 320 8001
830IFair Circle Palm Springs Ca 92262
9/8/00
Attn: Bruce and Jim Cathcart
This is an estimate for the work specified on the attached
Bid sheet for the property located at' 51001 Eisenhower Dr.'
La Quinta, CA..
All work to be completed in 120 days.
Payments to be made in three equal'draws, prior to
the start of any work, upon completion of masonry work
and the installation of new roof, andlupon completion of
the entire job.
This estimate does not include permits.
Total Bid: $17,125.00
I look forward to hearing from you.
State License No 648311 F. T. I D # 560-59-8495
VendorNo1000296
Contractors ere Required by LawToBe Licensed, end Regulated By The Contractor's State Lionise Board
• Any Questions Concerning A Contractor May Be Referred To The Registrar Of The Board
Whose Address is: Contractors. state Uoenee Board 1020 N St Sacramento, a 95814 0 2 4
FRbM : RIDDELLS HOME IMPROVET
PHONE' NO, : +760 320 800140, Sep. 08 2000 04:17PM P02
•
4 ,,..` xo.
I art
�.EI�,I��II1 x����?
i . .� ,! k;;;, : < C3)�„a;a�ii ., r;.•:$ 3:a:c ;<:;' ; is y." vim'. ('"TS:> v...:..mw.
oA,c`,i<?...<<. k'o..:.�.<,�v.::i.iS:k:SL?�>:f:YyJyiSi2�.: wV.l,<).c. }fl 11Ti /V,1/1�I�NN XM %�
i./.\.rr.
S: �
�&
,.<w v:acs��.iriir .:•'.di:x.:..
Y'
_ .;e:i``:"`'.v'rse:ie,•;,'�^.J,tir y; ).,,,,.;
<:'i�ak. R.�...ii'�>:>.'`... �:)...,«.v:,�w..:Aa>�.,�`.LSta>neea:i,. !1 G / n C / n n
cw .. 4s� w:a2<^i?iric "«?ar;vy�.t.yy�,;Q �+.r /. V .� / v v µ.
PRODUCER Weingarten Hough'-Lic#0086542
P 0 BOX 1866 'I
• ' i
THIS CERTIFICATE '}ISISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
-HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Palm Springs CA 92263 I
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
(760) 325-2526 I
1,
COMPANY, •
A ENVIRONMENTAL & CASUALTY INS.. CO.
INSURED 4
Riddell'a. Home, Improvement 1
COMPANY I •._
8
830 Fair Circle
i
COMPANY - . '—
C
-
Palm Springs CA 92262
(1760) 320-8001
COMPANY —'
.
!...... ;_: ti, isi .:.. :.,.,:<:. :..!4.r.�--....4....;,;31. _w:.. /,--......v
�)�>�y� L•.<: t� � � � 11��{ fi ,!q'.. • �» .R���w v. �� ... v�i.�.b,C� +5 `Y,i J 'q:,ro:'sl'r �>iii$i�" ��>C':v �';f.:>F. r5.!� ,:!Yn; •. .c+3.
:y:1�:F(,<,N.7.:.�k.i LLl:3:T\v1a':i"rii tio:<`<, .b:a..L.�!.i'�vc'<SC�u:< `'�r<�,:h.�t:is. ,..Sl'i vo.av< ;�v <> !'C ` °'1,`.>'�. [ a:<:k:`�< <:i�'.! l�a'�F •<: <h•.� x
).,!3.... n 'na i•. `1 ., `Vi �!f K hK o „� ..� �7s>fw..xw�:.��iR:tSf);C��i::�?�...�.lh �taNY.$'-^hir,:
aaa.w!..tiJ."''.., v.: V"$S :�\...:..4..�d kAv:.v �e��i<:J�.a.:;J: �,!, ... 'r':.. � <xe aeac<.«<,•eo�vrr4itiae. 1: ee ,>T>. t�. u, �� • .��iy��♦..<k,�:a"., r:F THAT
THIS IB TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THt INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IB SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO
LTR
TYRE OF INSURANCE
•
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE DeM/DD/YY)
POUCY EXPIRATION
DATE (MM/DDIYY)
UMITS
A
GENERAL UADIUTY
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$1 , 000 a, 000
X
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CGL 5 8 717 5
0 5/ 0 4/ 0 0
0 5/ 0 4/ 01
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$1 ,• 000 , 0 0 0
"< $
ih4..'
J CLAIMS MADE L�'JCC OUA
8.PERSONAL ADV INJURY
S 1( 000,000
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT
EACH OCCURRENM:
S 1> 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
`
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire)
.
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
r
I
MED EXP (Any one person)
$ 1 , 000 '
AUTOMOBILE
UABIUTY
ANY
ANY AUTO
I
1 / /
/ /
SINGLE LIMIT
$
_
AU. OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
I
.
BODILY INJURY
(Per person)
HIRED AUTOS
NON•OWNED AUTOS
•
BODILq INJURY
_
•
_
$
I
I
1
PROPERTY DAMAGE
GARAGE
LIABILITY
AUTO ONLY • EA ACCIDENT
S
ANY AVM
4 / /
- / /
OTI'IER THAN AUTO ONLY:
�{
., , >:. .. . ...—
I.
EACH ACCIDENT
$
$
-
•
AGGREGATE
EXCESS UABIUTY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
UMBRELLA FORM
•
i / /
/ /
AGGREGATE
$
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
.'
S
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
'
i
STATUTORY UMITS
EMPLOYERS' UABIUTY
,'
/ /
EACH ACCIDENT
$ •
THE PROPRIETOR/ a
-^—
INCL
' •
.
DISEASE • POUCY UMIT
$
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS ARE:
D(CL
.
DISEASE - EACH EMPLOYEE:
$
OTHER
•
•
/ '
./ /
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS) .00ATIONSNEHICLES!SPECIAL ITEMS
r
Operations of the insured for the Certificate Holder., •
• . I
l_^
:AMU ,AF44ew2 :a\ K..4:ti6k.sk;,' Ws4Kxi`YSh•KitFWv:,Vi
HomeSteps Asset Service!
A Freddie Mac Unit
Attn: `Tieh Ledbetter
12222 Merit Dr. Ste 700
Dallas, Tx. 75251-2277
y'� �y rW�' :��••'i�•:�i/i� ;l.k%,";Qtx: ,L '4s�iv.� S4�NZ.' *�N
,i.4s§§l4a)Lcz«xRY�7 2...,:�.R...A..,.XA�ihM
I SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL-BNDEAVOR TO MAIL'
t .• 3 Q DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT.
I BUT PAILu TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NQVBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
I OF ANY ND UPON TH COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPREBENTATIVEB,
AUTHORIZ PRESS TI C
A(7,t�i �^j //��yy����''>>�. �..5S��(( Q� ra:.{<�;• . tI f}%l:{ n.>,.v :P.\`:C<J,3.'<J; ".<`o'i1+t•:.�.:< a io. �.XTca: I. 4, ••..1t.: 14t�:h iSi v'tC.:.`. %eW���!!! 6
1.?,-.�•....., r,... .>,�.. . L,i,',t�ti�,rq ;,�,<�;��••r.;,vr<;pnv»;�t ;t; ei:S:4�hCtlN'`ic?d.?�CiC:a�3iS:£:xa}'r:4.'`.'.'•ia:i4aC:�>;'�'n•seo w;a5 ar.�:af:. X;it: : fd .�Y,S.'•Z;..{L..>S'•t::4 ,..4... ti ........
.'. j,,:,,.I+,iLM�Y,ii� ��4,�.•};iJ.at. i�W���:,•�<y1•:L"[�A::<w.o..a' >V :lvl.....iz:....n1r:..:.,..,..'!S?..:`.�3�>:J'.r:��,C�<:�..:.v<qax;.+:a:.�..0:\4.':�'�:�o:<.'s.•s:<..Kaa«.�•oi.K.kl�e�C.C..b....ti-...'. .mow:. ,,��,,.. ... ,.1.,!
e
026
V• •
O3
•
v
kri -r
t Is-- •
4-,
•*. '•-. y--.-e....:,.:-, ., ..,4, :•••
- :Kil',.... t ' \-.. •
.:.J'. ••••••;,, -•:-7r'E;#4.4")
. .. • \ ...,-- . ierfi'l?';',:,:•.' , 1,72.,. .,,;..
. ‘ •,-..,....,,,,
• • •
. . • . .,...- . .
. . • .. • ......
•
•
•
=..
.1.-•
'Ml.. -....-
'''.. -2.
'r.
'- 'At
.. •P
'',.. =•• 71_ '644
-•:.. —— co—. od. .. • -••••,,,,,:-,
4-:
\ •• .41 ,• -•:,i-
,,,
\ igli.,.....---,-.--•::::‘1 \ I -`4.-
......--......--...--.*.Q.
17.--•*.---••••,---.-4"J.
4.• , `.,`17„. \
..\
---...N:-.2-
• 1,
2
‘r
--S
027
:di
3TTACHMENT 3
'u.I�cic�
TilE1111cacf1/iIINTA..
IIESI&'tIIIBEIINE$
Prepared by:
tommurity Development Department
Adopted by the La Outnta (tty Cowl Jidy 7.1
• TABLEIITCIINTENTP
INTRODUCTION
I.A. OVERVIEW
I.B GOALS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES • 2
11. VILLAGE AT LA QUINTA DESIGN GUIDELINES 3
1I.A. LAND_USE _ . • 3
11.B. CIRCULATION CONSIDERATIONS 5
1. Vehicle Traffic and Parking. 5
2. • Pedestrian. Movement 8
II.C. SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN 9
1. Building Character • 9
2. Site Design and ;Activity Space 11
11.D. ACCESSORY PROVISIONS 13
1. . Streetscape 13
2. Signing 1, 3
3. Lighting/Landscaping, 14
REFERENCES
17
APPENDIX 18
029
INTRODUCTION
his document provides a flexible and
positive approach to regulating
development in The Village area.
When looking at The Village, there are
several problems whichrelate primarily to
the size of parcels and the existing street
patterns in the area. There are a myriad of
lot sizes and configurations, which make it
difficult to apply some of the most basic
zoning standards, such as setback, parking
and lot coverage requirements. In addition,
the existing,circulation system incorporates
jogs,. intersections and access situations
which are not conducive to typical
property development requirements.
However, site design . and development
solutions set forth by these Guidelines can
serve to build on the positive attributes in
the Village, such as climate, ambiance and
the natural views afforded the area.
I.A. Overview
0 ver the past several years, there
have been numerous discussions
on many different , levels,
involving the aty Council and
Planning Commission, aty staff, residents,
property owners, realtors and business
interests, regarding development potential
in The Village and what the area identity
should be. The common theme continues
be one of a village -oriented. area that will
maintain the quiet seclusion of the
mountain surroundings and the friendly
atmosphere, while encouraging business
-1-
development within that context.
/. B. Goals and
Guiding Principles
GOAL: Establish ' The Village at La
Quints as a mixed -use
area, . providing . a wide
range of residential and
commercial opportunities.
Principle - Permit a variety of
commercial, residential and lodging uses,
which will promote and serve The Village
area while allowing private forces to dictate
the extent of marketavailability for various
uses in the area.
GOAL: Promote the presence and
awareness of artistic and
cultural influences in The
Village environment.
Principle - Focus efforts of the Arts in
Public Places Program into The Village
area.
Principle - Encouragepublic and private
open spaces which can accommodate
artistic displays, shows, and similar events.
GOAL: Create a sense of design,
scale and place that will
lend itself to The Village
environment..
-2-
030
Principle - Provide for active and passive
pedestrian space, street furniture, traffic
calming techniques and similar methods to
enhance the concept of a Village
environment:
Principle - Prepare building, architecture
and site design guidelines which promote
The Village concept and allow flexibilityin
project proposals and staff direction to
applicants in achieving a sense of that
concept.
11. VILLAGE DESIGN
GUIDELINES
ILA. LAND USE
These Land Use Guidelines have been
developed based on La Quanta General
Plan policies and other documents as listed
under References.
• The Village area covered by these
Guidelines shall be as shown on
the area map in this document
(Figure 1). Land uses in all zoned
properties within the Guideline
boundary shall be consistent with
these Guidelines to the . extent
that they apply, recognizing that
these Guidelines are applicable in
zone districts other than Village
Commercial.
• Village land uses shall include a
diverse mix of retail, office and
-3-
f
residential *at varying densities
and scale.
• Land uses in The Village shall
include residential mixes, at
densities as set forth by the
General Plan. Uses .which are
100 % residential are permissible.
In general, residential uses shall
locate above commercial uses in
common buildings, or may be
located in stand-alone multi-
family residential buildings.
• Mixed -use development projects
are defined as commercial
office/retail, along with residential
uses, as part of one project site
or building.
• Retail mixed -use projects are not
subject to any floor/area ratic
(F.A.R.) or lot coverage
standards. The intensity of the
commercial component and
residential density shall be
determined on a site -specific
basis, under the Village Use
Permit process.
• Multi -story commercial
retail/office projects shall
generally locate office uses on
upper floors, but will be reviewed
on a site -specific basis.
• Land uses which encourage
entertainment, artistic displays
and other interactive component:
as part of the primary useart
desirable.
031:
IN NIS
INI
•
in limo
al MOM
MI MI
,.
11=111
MOM
EMI
IMMO
Minn
ON inn
MEM
IN■
MEM
TIMM
IMMO
NEM
Trimia
NITER
STEM
MEM
IN
■ _
_
amain
imem
FRANCES HACK
PARK
21141111111,6
imam
_■
__
EMEMMI
IMMO
WNW
OINIS
EMMEN
anion
mown
swum
worm
siosma
sommi
VMS WO
UNBEND
MINIM
INT TM
s
4EN-
__I
--
mom
mom
imam
mom
ammo
imam
ONNIMINee
eemeel
-Fr
TOMDTr
1
—i11111111111111
1111111111111111111
R 1111
LH
tl
ESTADO
.■
w
!
TT
INTIBTm
R■
52nd
flhlk
1111 111,
in
IMMIME
101
MIT la
lala Sae
s--
alP
NM IMIla
O
Tom
I On
IIMMIII
IMMUNE
FIGURE 1
AVENUE
N.T.S.
Village at La Quinta - Design Guideline Boundary
032
Village /and use patterns will be
. encouraged to reflect a sensitivity •
to the overall, accommodation of
pedestrian activity.
• Compact groupings of shops,
offices and other uses are
encouraged so as to promote
pedestrian mobility and space.
Attached as the Appendix to these
Guidelines are excerpts from various
design documents, which visually represent
some of the concepts referred to.
ILB. CIRCULATION
CONSIDERATIONS
Many circulation issues can be directly
related to street improvements and design
criteria that cannot. be addressed . in a
generalized planning guidance document.
However, there are many aspects of site
design that can impact circulation patterns.
and can be addressed to a certain degree.'
Vehicle Traffic
and Parking
• Development projects shall
address the feasibility of vacating
unnecessary street and alley
rights -of -way, especially relating
to potential adaptive reuse as
pedestrian and/or bike access,
-5-
on-street parking, erc.
• Right-of-way abandonment and
merger of lots shall be
encouraged and accommodated
where logical and feasible. It is
desirable to create larger blocks
and parcels for siting commercial
. and mixed -use projects, and such
actions taken for traffic purposes
may also have this benefit.
• Both City and private streetscape
projects shall equally consider the
pedestrian and bicycle in any
street improvement and site
planning.
• Streetscape items such as
lighting, benches, bus stops and
shelters, trash receptacles,
bicycle racks, etc., shall be
addressed by all private and
public development projects.
• Alleys used for vehicles shall be
designated one-way to reduce
traffic conflicts from adjacent
parking areas, deliveries and
through traffic.
• Rights -of -way for Calle .Estado
and Avenida La Fonda, between
Desert Club and Bermudas, shall
be investigated for reduction and
redesign of medians, curbsand
sidewalks to allow better
pedestrian movement and on -
street parking design.
033.
•
• Accessdriveways and
intersection configurations such
as those existing at the bank
building at the intersection of
Calle Estado and Avenida
Bermudas, shall be discouraged.
• The City shallestablish design
standards for special sidewalk
and pedestrian street crossing
treatments and materials.
• All development projects, public
and private, shall investigate the
use of various traffic calming and
pedestrian • enhancement
techniques, such as traffic
chokers, curb bulbs, partial or full
street closures, traffic circles,
etc. as alternatives in developing
all project improvements in The
Village.
• Off-street parking areas shall not
be located •in the front of
buildings, but to the rear and
sides to allow integrated .shared
parking, areas between structures
and open up the street frontage
to pedestrian access and outdoor
activities. Parking areas shall be
clustered whenever possible; any
off-street parking not provided
on -site shall be located in
designated City (public) parking
areas to achieve this.
• Where feasible and appropriate,
on -street parking may be credited
toward meeting off-street parking
requirements.
-7-
Pedestrian
Movement
• Public and private projects. shall
provide a clear delineation of all
pedestrian circulation areas.
• Adequate • shading, • through
landscaping or building design
features, for pedestrians along
street frontages as well as
interior . project areas shall be
provided.
• Pedestrian focal points, such as
community gardens, plazas,
courtyards, piazzas, etc., shall be
provided in public and private
projects where deemed
appropriate. Consideration shall
be given to existing surroundings
and the project relationship to the
overall circulation in the vicinity.
• Paving accents, interlocking
stones/tiles, and other materials
and pattems shall be employed in
all Village projects so as to define
pedestrian zones and spaces, and
maintain separation from vehicle
traffic.
• Building frontages along streets
requireadequate space for
pedestrian movement, street
furnishings and outdoor spaces,
but shall also maintain a close
proximity to pedestrian travel
ways.
-8-
034
•
Pedestrian links shall be
incorporated . in all public and
private .development projects.
Linking shall consider the existing
pedestrian environment and
provide for future access
potential.
• The City shall consider /inking
pedestrian areas . created by
private and public projects into a
Village -wide system, once
development activity
demonstrates the potential need.
Attached as the Appendix to these
Guidelines are excerpts from various
design documents, which visually represent
some of the concepts referred to.
II.C. SITE AND
BUILDING DESIGN
The main focus of the site and building
design portions of these Guidelines is to
promote the element of human scale,
consistent with the objective of creating a
pedestrian environment in The Village.
. Building
Character
• Building mass and scaleshall be
compatible with that of
surrounding structures.
•
Buildings shall be designed with
appropriate architectural variation
and detailing to break - up
monotonous building elevations.
Treatments such as graduated
heights, balconies, recessed and
extended building sections,
staggered setbacks, 'etc. should
be employed.
• Buildings located on comers shall
attempt to orient pedestrian
entryways to the • comer,..
providing an opportunity for a . .
small entry court or plaza, water
feature location, etc. This also
allows for better intersection
visibility.
Retail buildings along street
frontages shall be close to the
street and sidewalk areas to
promote window shopping and
streetside activity.
• Commercial buildings shall be
enhanced . with various
architectural elements such as
arcades, trellises, porches, bays,
towers and balconies, with the
intent . of promoting the
pedestrian environment.
• Buildings shall incorporate design
elements that draw in pedestrians
and reinforce street activities,
especially along streets such as
Calle Estado and Avenida La
Fonda.
-10-
0 35 .
•
•
Variations in floor levels, steps
and stairs, building faces, roof
forms and other treatments that
help create the appearance of a
smaller project shall be
encouraged.
• Building heights shall gradually
transition between each other. In
order to preserve mountain views
and the intrinsic qualities of The
Village environment, building
height -shall -not exceed 2 stories.
However, architectural features
integral to the building design and
which contribute to a consistent
building appearance and scale
should be permitted to exceed
any prescribed height limit to a
reasonable extent.
2. Site Design and
Activity Space
As an area that promotes outdoor
activities, proper design of outdoor spaces
is essential to The village. These spaces
must provide for both passive and active
outdoor needs, from , sitting quietly to
accommodating an art display or outdoor
musical performance.
• Courtyards and. other types of
pedestrian . and passive open
space shall be provided when off -
site parking scenarios are
employed.
-11-
Layout of building sites in, The
Village shall consider movement
of pedestrians as significant as
the movement of vehicles.
Adjacent retail and mixed -use .
projects shall . consider use of
pedestrian alleys, which can be
used to lure pedestrians to
interior shop areas, • plazas,_
courtyards, restaurants, etc.
These can be usedeffectively to
create a desire to explore a given
space, drawing pedestrians to
different activity areas. •
• The site layout for any project
shall • demonstrate . adequate
capacity for the use envisioned
e.g., an outdoor cafe will require
greater streetside setback than a
typical retail store); otherwise the
use should not be allowed.
• Water features shall be
incorporated into projects where
appropriate.
• Structures shall be sited to create
internal spaces, with- pedestrian
access available from the street
or off-street parking areas.
• Entries into shops and offices
shall access directly to a
pedestrian oriented street . or
other .pedestrian access; single
access multiple tenant buildings
should be discouraged.
-12-
036
•
ACCESSORY
PROVISIONS
1. Streetscape
• Public and private development
projects shall.. encourage and
facilitate provision of street
furnishings, such as bicycle
racks, trash receptacles, benches,
drinking fountains, etc.
Street furniture shall be
appropriately sited and should not
obstruct or block pedestrian
travel, or interfere with sidewalk
businesses.
• The City shall investigate
establishing a streetside banner
mast program, to be used for
announcing and. defining the area
for special events such as
Mainstreet Marketp/ace. Street
lighting posts could be used as
the banner masts.
• The formation of a Downtown
Business Association, which .
would address issues such as a
business improvement district,
attraction, retention and other
assistance efforts, shall be
encouraged.
2. Signing
• Building signs shall be designed
as an integral feature of the
-13-
buildings they relate to, and be in
good scale and proportion to the
structures.
• Village Entry /den tifica tion Signs
shall be . established at key •
intersection locations around The
Village area, and shall be
supplemented with . Village• .
directional signs . . where
appropriate. The following key
intersection .locations are
identified:.
• Washington Street and
Calle Tampico
• Eisenhower Drive and. Ca1/e
Tampico
• Avenida Bermudas and 52i°
Avenue
Additional or alternate locations
may be identified and designated
as may be deemed appropriate.
Entry and directional signs shall
be monument type, with indirect
lighting. Sign designs shall
incorporate common landscaping
and design characteristics.
• Directional signs shall be in
appropriate proportion to entry
sign design.
• Project applications involving
specified locations will be
required to participate in
establishing these .signs, . in
concert with any City or other
-14-
037
established procedures ' .or
programs in effect at such rime.
3. Lighting/
Landscaping
• Lighting shall be maintained at a
low /eve/ and limited primarily to
landscaped areas, consistent with
the Outdoor Light Control
Ordinance.
Any building mounted lighting.
shall be designed to highlight
building . entries, dramatize
specific architectural features and
accentuate light and shadow to
articulate facades.
Landscaping treatments shall be
provided to enhance architectural
features and to provide shade for
pedestrian and parking areas.
• Continuity of landscape design
shall . be maintained • between
adjacent developments.
• Standards for tree wells and
street trees shall be prepared and
adopted.
• Where building sites limit the
available planting area, the
placement of trees in parkways
and pavedareas shall be
encouraged.
-15-
• Screening of parking areas, utility
boxes, servicing and waste
enclosures, and other unsightly
areas shall be accomplished by
• using combinations of
landscaping, walls and earthen _
berms. Hearty species shall be
used to insure year-round
• effectiveness.
Attached as . the' Appendix to these
Guidelines are excerpts from • various
design documents, which visually represent
some of the concepts referred to.
-16-
038
REFERENCES . _
CITY AND COUNTY DOCUMENTS:
• City of Belmont, CA; Design Control District, Belmont Zoning Ordinance, 1996
• City of Downey, CA; General Plan Design Element, 1992
• City of La Quinta, CA; Village at La Quinta Specific Plan, SP 87-009, 1988.
• City of La Verne, CA;. General Plan Design Element, 1990
• City of Merced, CA; Merced Village Design Guidelines, 1991
•
City of San Bernardino, CA:
- Property Development Standards, Development Code, 1991
- Main Street Overlay District, Development Code, 1991
• City of Seattle, WA; Making Streets That Work, Seattle Engineering Department and the
Office of Planning and Management, May 1996
County of Santa Cruz, CA; Felton Town Plan, 1987
ADDITIONALREFERENCES:
• . Peter Calthorpe; The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community and the American
Dream, Princeton Architectural Press, 1993
• CSPU Pomona, Department of Urban and Regional Planning; Class exercise for URP
431 /432. Design Studio, conducted by Professor Richard E. Lloyd for the La Quanta
Chamber of Commerce, October 1996 to July 1997:
- "The Village" Study and Improvement Proposals, April 1997
- Village Impressions: Design Images for La Quinta Village
-17-
'039 '
1
APPENDIX:
f '
GRAPHIC EXAMPLES OF
•
DESIGN GUIDELINE REPRESENTATIONS
•1
-18-
0.40 •
Village Design
Implemention of mixed -use
developmentis accomplished
through zoning ordinances,
general plan, and specific plans.
Incentives for developers
provide flexibility of site design,
parking and housing
requirements.
Mixed -use development is very popular in
many downtown central business districts.
Mixed -use developments allow maximum use
of the village and brings people into the
downtown. It also creates a pedestrian
environment at human scale.
Awnings, arches. large windows and planter
boxes are important to the architectural .
character of a building and the Village area.
Walkways are protected front th,
• by landscaping and awni
Pedestrian design is enconi:
through awnings, outdood'
Iandseaping, balconies,
store front windows,
interesting building facades
Parking lots located in alit
make It easy to walk hetw
commercial businesses will.
crossing large parking loss
congested streets.
Building Desiffi
Multi -level structures include covered
patios on the ground floor and
balconies above. A variety of building
elements can be used to create trellises
for shade on balconies and increase
design appeal. A variety of .
components can be used to create.
different and unusual effects. Wood,
stucco, glass and iron work produce
textures -that are interesting and
inviting.
Planter boxes permit landscape
materials to grow just about anywhere.
Structures - -are . transformed and
softened with plants.
Window openings should be
proportionate to the buildings. should'
be multi -pained and allow maximum
light at each level.
Arcade
Stairway at Tlaquepaque
tilt ... Nrtittu11u111t
,c41� nut; ,� *n�r1nN • „✓,
Decorative wooden balcony
0.42
•
Building Design
Elements. . .
treatment of building facade.
Gateways at Tiaquepaque, Sedona, AZ.
. . .and
Architectural.
Treatments.
• 1
043
J
•
Sidewalk Design
s
i NM III! MERU
Ike\
Plaza and Garden Design
•
Sidewalk design is important to the success
of the Village. Sidewalks need to provide
comfort, safety and visual stimulation for
pedestrian traffic.
Trees that hang over the sidewalk provide
protection from the hot desert sum. Trees
are also visually interesting and offer a
variety of shares of green and color
Sidewalk construction should consist of a
combination of diverse textures, materials,
and patterns. Creative designs and colors
_break up the dull image of a regular
• concrete sidewalk.
044
411
Street Furniture Design
Bus stops, newspaper racks, public telephones, and otl
services should be housed in similarly designed architectu
structures. These are functional items that should not be l
out of the design scheme. Carefully designed street furniture
helps build character for the street and creates consistency
in the Village.
Fountains are important visual elements
for streetscape. They provide decoration
for open spaces and courtyards. They
should be designed to enhance and
complement the surroundings. The sound
. of running water is also soothing and
stimulates relaxation and comfort
045
Streetscape Design
Building frontages are essential to the
downtown pedestrian character of the village.
The building should provide openings at
street level, to allow display windows for
pedestrians and passing traffic. These large
windows provide visual interest, and
encourages pedestrian activity. Buildings
Buildings should be designed to increase activity. Restaurant
and entertainment adjacent to major pedestrian paths increas
traffic in the Village. Outdoor uses should be encouraged i
the Village.
should be designed to locate high activity •
uses such as restaurants and entertainment„
adjacent to major pedestrian paths. Outdoor
uses are especially encouraged along
pedestrian paths
Minimal parking spaces in front of buildings
ensures a pedestrian friendly atmosphere.
046
Streetscape Den
. Street Furniture
There/are several kinds.of street furniture: benches, drinking
fountains, kiosks, docks and others. Be careful to locate street
furniture away from crosswalks, curb cuts, fire hydrants,
loading and bus zones. Remember that sidewalks must have
five feet of clear passage to ensure pedestrian safety.
beet ;used It "•
The community wants to:
• increase social activity on a street .
• add;distinctive features that help identify an area
• provide places to sit or get information (from kiosks or signs)
Street Trees
best used If 0
• the entire block would like to plant trees along their street
• neighborhood has a plan for the final design of their street
• tree placement does not block existing street lighting
• a neighborhood plan identifies streets that are most appro-
priate for street tree projects
• there is both adequate space for trees and for a minimum
sidewalk width.
Flower Planters and Banners
Flower planters are a delightful way to show off a business
district. The use of district —wide "cross -
Street'.' or "pole" banners are an effective way to advertise
upcoming 'events or to identify an area.
best used It
• community wishes to add attractive detail to the street
• community would like to create a visual link throughout
entire business. district .
• community would like to promote an area or special event
• neighborhood consensus favors a consistent planter or
banner program. .
047
Traffic Calming techniques
Choker
A choker is a set of two curb bulbs that extend out into the
street. A choker narrows the road, sometimes down to one
lane, and causes motorists to slow when entering and exiting '
the street.
lurb bulbs extend the sidewalk into the street. The bulbs,
rhich may be landscaped, improve pedestrian crossings by
roviding better visibility between pedestrians and motorists,
shortening the crossing distance, and reducing the time that
pedestrians are in the street. Curb bulbs located at the inter-
section also prevent people from parking in a crosswalk or
blocking a curb ramp. Curb bulbs may encourage motorists to
drive more slowly by restricting turning speeds and narrowing
the roadway.
Marked Crosswalks
111101
NMI
•
r..
Curb Bulbs
Legal crosswalks exist at all intersections, but they are not
always marked by signs or pavement markings. Crosswalks
can be marked at intersections and at midblock locations.
Marked crosswalks alert motorists that they are approaching a
high pedestrian location, and guide pedestrians to a safer
crossing. Crosswalks are usually marked lines, either two
parallel lines or a ladder —type pattern. They can also be tex-
tured or made of colored concrete. Midblock crosswalks are
accompanied by signs or flashing beacons.
0.48 .
More I raitic l.airreg..
Pedestrian Refuge Islands
r
11111tilt
L
Pedestrian refuges are raised islands in the center of the street
• protecting the pedestrian from moving traffic: They allow
pedestrians an opportunity to cross one half of the roadway,
with a safe place to stop before crossing the second half of the
roadway. They are typically constructed at'marked crosswalks
either at a midblock location or at an intersection. •
Full Street Closure
A full closure is a physical barrier that closes the street to
motor vehicles. Usually landscaped; a full closure can be built
to accommodate pedestrians, bicycles and wheelchairs. •
best used H
• street is used as a cut —through route
• a less restrictive device cannot address concerns
• there is a desire to create a pedestrian place.
Partial Street Closure
A partial closure is a curb bulb that physically blocks one
direction of traffic at an intersection on an otherwise two—way
street. A temporary partial closure is accomplished through
striping and signs (No Right Turn, No Left Tarn, Do Not
Enter).
049.
•
Calle Estado/La Fonda:
Schematic Street Plan
Os c-way
Pedestrian path Oas-way
110' sidewalk
water feature 20' travel
12' parking
• 1.36' center
median - usable
as pedestrian
promenade
Grosswralt I
The above plan is a conceptual view based on the existing 100-foot R.O.W. on both
Calle Estado and La Fonda. Travel way, sidewalk, median widths, etc. would be
• adjusted based on desired intent for pedestrian/vehicular traffic accommodation,
appropriate City standards and changes in design concept as shown. Planter areas,
fountains, art. pie.ces and pedestrian walks are some of the 'improvements which are
contemplated for the central median concept. Angle parking could be incorporated
into such a median, or permitted in lieu of the parallel parking scheme shown here.
050
TACHMENT 4
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
• Enhance aesthetics and restore
historic features.
Offset building improvement costs.
City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
(760) 777-7000
http://www..la-quinta.org
051
•
PROGRAM GOALS
•
The La Quinta Redevelopment Agency established the Commercial Property
Improvement Program to encourage and assist businesses with enhancing the
economic and aesthetic potential of their property. Program objectives include:
• The rehabilitation of commercial structures to enhance aesthetics, restore historic
features, and extend a building's economic life.
• Offsetting building improvement costs to facilitate the efforts of creating and
expanding business enterprises. .
Grants of up to $15,000 may be available to eligible tenants and business/commercial
property owners. These grants may fund building improvements including new
facades, signs, painting, lighting, parking, and landscaping.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
. Owners and tenants of commercial property within Redevelopment Project Area No. 1
are eligible to apply. Property owner(s) 'must provide written authorization for:..
program participation if the applicant is a tenant.
ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
Grants may fund engineering and architectural design, permits and fees, and exterior
improvement construction costs. Eligible construction elements include:
• Exterior Facade Improvements: .Reconstruction or removal and replacement of
signs, awnings, canopies, exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, and
decorative roof treatments to the entrance and visible sides of the building(s).
The removal of old, obsolete, and non -conforming signs is required.
• Site Improvements: Reconstruction and/or expansion of parking lots, sidewalks,
landscaping and irrigation systems, exterior lighting, and other improvements that
enhance the general appearance of the property.
• Demolition: Removal of structurally unsound or non -conforming structures...,
• Other Improvements: Electrical and plumbing system upgrades may also qualify
when directly associated with facade improvements. • The eligibility of .other
capital improvements will be examined by Agency staff on a case -by -case basis.
All work must be performed by a licensed contractor. A, City business license and all
applicable building permits must be obtained.
AVAILABLE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Applicants will be considered on a first -come, first served basis, with the degree of
financial assistance determined by the Agency. All approved grants will require a
10% funding match by the applicant. A maximum of $15,000 will be allocated to any
one property in a given fiscal year.
Approved grant funds may be used to reimburse an applicant for up to $1,000 in
architectural service fees. Subsequent architectural expenses may be matched dollar
for dollar. However, all architectural service costs will be the applicant's responsibility •
if the improvements are not constructed per the approved grant.
052
• •
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design guidelines for facade improvements include:
• Enhancing the original features of the building, including significant architectural
details.
• Incorporating colors that complement neighboring buildings.
• Utilizing materials suitable to the building style.
• Providing exterior accentfeatures to enhance appearance.
• Using appropriate and creative signing, landscaping, and lighting.
• Increasing and/or opening up window areas to expose interiors. This includes
the avoidance of clutter and poorly designed window treatments.
All eligible properties are encouraged to incorporate design elements as presented in
the Village Design Guidelines.
FUNDING CRITERIA
The City's Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC) will score
applications based on the following categories. A range of 0 to 10 will be used for
each category, with 10 as the highest score. The ALRC will then multiply each score
by. the category weight, add the results, and normalize over a 0 to 100 range.
Applications with a score greater than 70 will be eligible for program funding.
Categories include:
Building and Structural Improvements: This . includes the reconstruction or.
removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non -conforming uses (i.e..
signs), and other improvements that enhance the general. appearance of the
subject property (50 points).
• Scale and Quality of Facade Improvements: This may include the reconstruction
or removal and replacement of signs, awnings/canopies, exterior wall finishes,
doors and windows, decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the entrance
and visible sides of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must
be considered (25.points).
• Stimulation of Private Investment: Proposed improvements must make the
Project Area more attractive and visible to customers, neighboring merchants,
and residents. Special consideration of up to 10 additional points will be
provided for those improvements related to the creation of new businesses, or
the expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area (10
points). 0
• Other. This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique
structural and site design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, :and/or •
recreational opportunities (10 points). -
• Applicant Matching Funds: Applicants may receive up to 5 points for exceeding
the required 10% applicant funding match (5 points).
053
•
•
PROGRAM PROCEDURES
Applicants seeking. grant allocations are subject to the following . program
procedures. Applicants are encouraged to consult with Agency staff throughout the
process:
• The applicant will. submit to the Agency a completed application (see rear),
along with a project description and current photos of the subject property. .
• If the requested . funding is Tess than $3,000, the applicant will prepare
improvement sketches and preliminary cost estimates. If the requested funds
exceed $3,000, an architect or other design professional is required to prepare
the required plans and cost estimates. All sketches and plans must identify
materials, colors, and other related improvement requests.
• Upon submittal, completed applications, sketches, and plans will be evaluated
by the ALRC based on funding criteria.
• lithe requested funding is Tess than $3,000, the applicant will obtain and submit
two (2) quotes for materials subject to reimbursement consideration. Applicants
requesting funding greater than $3,000 will not be required to submit the quotes
for materials. Instead, the applicant will need to obtain and submit three (3)
contractor bids and proof of contractor insurance.
• The Agency and applicant will sign a Building Improvement Rebate Agreement,
outlining the work to be completed. No work will commence (other than the
initial design sketches or plans) until the Agency receives the executed Rebate
Agreement and the applicant obtains all required building permits.
• The applicant is responsible for project implementation. The project must be
started within three (3) months and be completed within one (1) year after
execution of the Rebate Agreement.
• Applicants requesting funding greater than $3,000 may wish to receive three
equal progress payments. If so, the Rebate Agreement will include three
milestones for payment. The applicant must demonstrate achievement of each
milestone in order to process payment. The first milestone will occur when
construction begins, the second when the project is 50% complete (the Rebate
Agreement will include a description of this requirement), and the third when the
project is certified as complete by staff.
• Upon construction completion,: the applicant will submit photos of the finished
project and receipt of payment to vendors or contractors. Agency staff will then
visit the site to certify project completion. .
• The applicant receives the agreed upon funding or final payment once the
Agency grants written certification.
054
La Q to Redevelopment Agency
Concial Property Improvement Program A
g P
ation
Applicant Information
Applicant Name:
Applicant Phone: Applicant E-Mail:
Name of Business:
Mailing Address:
Business Phone: Business Fax:
Property Owner: Yes:. No:
Business Owner: Yes: No:
Project Information
Business Location
Type of Business' '
Project Goals.
Proposed Improvements:
Total Project Cost (please attach cost estimate):
Requested Agency Assistance. Applicant Budget Amount:
Description of Applicant Funding Sources:
Proposed Project Duration:
Attachments
• Two (2) color photographs of.the property where improvements will be installed
• Project sketches or plans (based upon funding level)
• Cost estimates
Certification Statements
If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the following certification must be completed
by the property owner:
the owner of property involved in this application.
subject property involved in this application may be
fiscal year.
Signature:
declare under penalty and perjury that I am
I acknowledge that only one (1) tenant of the
awarded program funding in any one (1) given
Date:
The following statement must be completed by the applicant and property owner:
I/we acknowledge the filing of this application and certify that all above information is true and correct
to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. I/we understand that a Building Improvement Rebate
Agreement must be signed and authorized by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency prior to
commencing any work on the.project.
Signature: Date:
Signature: Date:
• .TTACHMENi 5
FUNDING CRITERIA WORKSHEET
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS:
This includes the reconstruction or removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non-
conforming uses (i.e.. signs), and other improvements that enhance the general appearance
of the subject property.
50
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight _ = weighted score
SCALE AND QUALITY OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS:
This may include the .reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs, awnings/canopies,
exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the
entrance and visible sides of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must be
considered.
25
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT:
Proposed improvements must make the Project Area more attractive and visible to customers,
neighboring merchants, and residents. Special consideration of up to 10 additional points will
be provided for those improvements related to the creation of new businesses, or the
expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area.
10
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight weighted score
OTHER:
This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique structural and site
design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, and/or recreational opportunities..
10
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
APPLICANT MATCHING FUNDS:
Applicants may receive up to 5 points for exceeding the required 10% applicant funding
match.
10
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score •
Total of all weighted scores: divide by 10 = (FINAL SCORE)
(70 points required to receive funding)
056
•
RESPONDENCE
•
1
{
r
•
NO PLANS