Loading...
VAR 1210S " APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Case No. As Provided by Article XIX of Zoning Ordinance• Zone ORDINANCE NO. 348 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA TO: THE'RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: I. NAME OF APPLICANT Elkee Corporation A. Only the following persons may file. Applicant must indicate under what capacity he is filing by placing (x) in.block provided. (XX) 1. The record owner of the land. (if in escrow, give Escrow. No. The purchaser thereof under a contract in writing duly acknowledged by both the buyer and the seller. (COPY OF CONTRACT MIDST BE ATTACHED.) The lesseeain possession of the property, with the written consent of the record owner. (WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION MUST BE ATTACHED.) 4. The agent of any of the foregoing, duly authorized thereto in `"" f•., writing. (WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION MUST BE ATTACHED.) ......y/ • II:- PROPERTY IN QUESTION r „. A: c - Street address of property Eisenhower Drive • ':ra Situated on the West side of said street between 1, •'° and Coachella Drive �r c, Avenida • ra • 1 r ,fir/'/ •/ �• ` � Fernando Legal description of real property located in the County Qf Riverside must be . "'" accuratelyd cribed as per Riverside County records. ee description actacneds • • (If more space is needed for above description, attach supplementary sheet.) Date of acquisition of property. Outline deed restrictions pertinent to this 'application. (Any permit granted pursuant to this petition shall not affect deed restrictions of record.) None . E. Land use of property. Proposed planned. residential development• HI. APPLICANT'S REQUEST r.: A. Outline in space below in clear and concise wording what you are requesting: for the property in question. Before this application.is accepted, there must be attached a plot drawn to -scale showing boundaries and dimensions of the property, width of boundary streets, all existing improvements on property, and plans and elevations of all proposed new improvements. Applicant must. file with this application evidence of his ability and intention to proceed. with the actual construction work in accordance with said plans within six (6) months from date of.filing this'application. We request the. deletion of a six-foot high masonry wall as. required in Article XVIII Section lb.5(9) SCREENING, from the entire boundary of the proposed project. That no screening be required for those areas where the project abutts the hills and that a .planted .screen be accepted for those areas that are not adjacent to the hills. FORM 133-3 B. State what exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions there are applicable to the property involved, or to the intended use of the property, and • explain why these conditions do not apply generally to other property adjacent to your property and in the neighborhood. The hills are adjacent to the property and will act as.a natural: screen and barrier. The project is located in the desert area and a planted screen will be more in keeping with the development in the. area. A block wall would serve little or no purpose. . State why the granting of this Variance as requested is necessary to-do. substantial justice to the applicant and to avoid practical difficulty, unnecessary hardship. and results inconsistent with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. The construction of a.block wall over and around the hills would be'extremely costly and would serve no purpose and -would not be practical to accomplish. . State why the granting of this variance as requested will not result in material damage to other property in the neighborhood, nor be detrimental to the public safety or - 'welfare_ The hills.will. �actas; a;::screen inpaace::.of.:-any. wall .thereby not °resulting im.damage-.to. the adjacent .property. The .planted screen .will.etihance the other:.' boundaries and will. -.not be detrimental to `the public- safety and welfare. NOTE: .,. It is desirable but not mandatory to have the signature of owners of adjacent property certifying that they have no objection to the establishment of the use as applied for in this application. :- ' - We, the undersigned owners of property in the vicinity of the property legally 'described:in-this APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE, hereby certify that we do not object to the -granting of this application. Signature E_G.KEn ORPoRA- 77O/V CO RPOR Address IeOO�aJ /OOO- deo, 011ie 400i /.;,c i vo/s 6060.4 OLL-: VeS/D/oWy KEE- Co2Pc2AW-r/ oN) more pace is needed atch supplementary sheet.• .S.W^'1E OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF /[L/nio/St SS, COUNTY OF Cook. f We, tn// i' -'l P 51PiGwr Pres,c(errf, avrd ROGER K. METZ, i4Ss/5fa47 Secrefaryof • /HACMf CoRPRKAT/o sof e.,„,. C1(er�o'P�1 being duly sworn depose and say that I am an owner o property involved in this application and that theforegoing signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information submitted herewith are in all respects true and correct to the- •_ best of my knowledge and belief. ��- Signed PHONE NO.342-265'404/0 Subscribed and sworn to before me this resi •s c cy iPOo r, /6,0 - 2o1 S. Sa //e Ch,ca 90, ////ho/s 606o L day f r of 0c7l06ei- 197z (Not. ublic)4/4,v5r 64. Dc54o.! ' (CC,tstn/ssion expires 3 -.5:7 ) ii.f114 W:4 LOWVCtild APLT.AiN.1 • L.NAK AIA'Ll!kr Elkee Corporation ADORE 208 S LaSalle St.,Room 1000, Chicago, Illinois 80 2. &ARE 01' WAR 0.f diffe.vent non, atovc-, • ADDRESS Or WAR 3. NAL th. nia.ESr4TIVE (Eugiuee, im.40mm.) F. Davidson Assoc. ADDRESS P.O. Box 493.1. Riverside/ Calif. 92500 . Robert Chalmers, 216 E. OntarfO"' St . , Chicago, REF: C/Z 1511 fOR OtqFVE USE ..0ALY _ AGENDA ITE14-# 6 VARIANCE SUBJECT. Deletion of block wall VATE 10/18.72' .INTERviEwED - HHS 4. Applicotion Complete OK 5. Filing Tee Attached 6. Plot Plans Checked $160.00 OK 14strietw70001ibiii 2... La Quints 4cne R-2 -8000-& R-5' .00 7. Assessor's }.kok No. 631 Poge 30, 37 8. Legal Deweiption Complete and ChetRed OK 9. Tentotive Hearin?.1 Date 10. Agency Y.,00dline Dote il. Assign Case No. Nov. 30, 197.2 Nov. 20, 1972 Variance # 1210-E - L2. Receipt for Cheek r. Assigil Place on Agenda (dote and h)ur) Newspaper 0.5. To be Published Not Later than l6. Notice Nutiee L. Notice zAir TO to Apt;licant Mailed Moiled Posted on Property By Aai.C. Dept. Poll. tont. Piot. Airport Dir. Chaklber of Cog,meru Plan.Offi Div, of . - Deser SEE C.U. # 1477-E tJae:,ks Deot, Riv.„ V.1uod He6ath Dept. Land Jse Number of COpie8 of Caf.1 Required Section 18.5(9) Nite Road Pept. St.. Divof lqous . Woter Quol Dept. o adg. Dept.. (1 •/ — ,-.!•• ..-•• , ; r 'ffq • -: t-; • 6111111110 12111100_— tC • ?:. Elkee Corp. " . 1210-E : c waiver of development standards R-2-8000 (multiple family - 8000 sq. ft. lot area per unit) and R-5 (Open Area Combining Zone Residential Development) 0./1 r,l.f3d; on the West side of Eisenhower Drive, k mile North of 50th Avenue La Quinta emcp5100, ikaa moT:e partley • A portion of the East half of Section 36, T.SS, R.6E, S.B.B.M. pt;thiu :aid 0A Thursday Nov. 30th Let. '1.47; 40:1, Yod1a, , ; ; . AREP. 7, ' Ice.% . ; - SC1 t . •1.: ASSOCIATES LINK PROGRAMS; September 13, 1972 All that portion of the East one-half of. Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, S.B.B. & M., as shown by Government Survey; described as follows: - Beginning at the North one -quarter. corner of said. Section; Thence Southerly.on the center line of said Section,.to a point which is 2639.26 feet North of the South one -quarter. corner of said Section , said point being the Northwest corner of the Southeast one -quarter of said Section and -is the Northwest corner of that certain pa.rcel.conveyed to Lucille H..Loeb.by Deed recorded July 11,.1961, Records of Riverside County, California, as Instrument No. 58822; Thence N.89°59'00"E., along the Northerly.line of said property.conveyed to Lucille H. Loeb, a -distance of 506.50 feet, Thence S.00°01'00"E., and parallel with the Westerly line of the Southeast one -quarter of said Section, a distance of 26.07 feet to the most Northerly corner of that parcel conveyed to Carl Loeb, Jr. by Deed recorded May 26, 1964,.as Instrument No. 64242, Records of Riverside County, California; Thence S.69°18'30"E., a distance of 126.75•feet; Thence S.56°41'45"E., a distance of 136.01 feet; , Thence S.26°21'00"E., a distance of 260.02 feet; Thence S.17°44'00"E., a distance of.130.03 feet; Thence S.11°54'45"E.,a distance of 212.40 feet; Thence S.41°41'15"W., a distance of 195.80 feet; Thence S.57°05'15"W., a distance of 91.71 feet; The preceding seven courses and distances are along the J. f. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES • CIVIL ENGINEERS 3426 TENOR STREET, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA92501 PLANNERS-SUIIVEYORS _ ._...k...w..�., ..<�rr .., LINK PROGRAMS; September 13, 1972 All that portion of the East one-half of. Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, S.B.B. & M., as shown by Government Survey; described as follows: - Beginning at the North one -quarter. corner of said. Section; Thence Southerly.on the center line of said Section,.to a point which is 2639.26 feet North of the South one -quarter. corner of said Section , said point being the Northwest corner of the Southeast one -quarter of said Section and -is the Northwest corner of that certain pa.rcel.conveyed to Lucille H..Loeb.by Deed recorded July 11,.1961, Records of Riverside County, California, as Instrument No. 58822; Thence N.89°59'00"E., along the Northerly.line of said property.conveyed to Lucille H. Loeb, a -distance of 506.50 feet, Thence S.00°01'00"E., and parallel with the Westerly line of the Southeast one -quarter of said Section, a distance of 26.07 feet to the most Northerly corner of that parcel conveyed to Carl Loeb, Jr. by Deed recorded May 26, 1964,.as Instrument No. 64242, Records of Riverside County, California; Thence S.69°18'30"E., a distance of 126.75•feet; Thence S.56°41'45"E., a distance of 136.01 feet; , Thence S.26°21'00"E., a distance of 260.02 feet; Thence S.17°44'00"E., a distance of.130.03 feet; Thence S.11°54'45"E.,a distance of 212.40 feet; Thence S.41°41'15"W., a distance of 195.80 feet; Thence S.57°05'15"W., a distance of 91.71 feet; The preceding seven courses and distances are along the J. f. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES • CIVIL ENGINEERS 3426 TENOR STREET, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA92501 PLANNERS-SUIIVEYORS _ ._...k...w..�., ..<�rr .., Link Program:., In Page 2 Northeasterly line of that property conveyed to Carl .Loeb, "Jr.;.; Thence Easterly on a curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of.161.99 feet, through an angle of 61°23'00", an arc length of 173..55 feet (the initial radial line. bears S.38°19'00"W.); Thence N.66°56'00"E., a distance of 182.41:feet; Thence Easterly, on a curve concave to the Southeast, having a radius of.300.00 feet, through an angle of 23°00'00", an arc length of 120.43 feet (the initial radial line bears .N.23°04'00"W.); Thence N.89°56'00"E.,-a distance of 111.45..feet, more or less, to a point on the Westerly line of Avenida Serra (now Eisenhower Drive), as shown onmap of La Quinta Golf Estates No. 1, recorded in Book 37 of Maps, at Page 98 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California; Thence Northeasterly, along the Northwesterly line of said Avenida Serra (now Eisenhower_ Drive) to its intersection with the Westerly line of Tract No. 3411, as recorded'in Book 56of Maps, at Page 100.thereof, Records of California; Thence N.00°39'24"W., along the Westerly 'line of said Tract 3411, a distance of 5.09 feet to the Southeast corner of that certain parcel conveyed to Kings Canyon Incorporated by Deed recorded July 1 1960, as Instrument No. 58594; Thence S.89°58'30"W.,"along said parcel conveyed to Kings Canyon Incorporated and the Southerly line of that certain parcel conveyed to Frances L.Brody by Deed recorded July 1, 1960, as Instrument No. 58592, a distance of 73.0.00 feet Thence N.00°01'30"W., along the Westerly line of said parcel.. conveyed to Frances L. Brody, a distance of 2354.70 feet to a point on the North line of the Northeast one -quarter of said Section; Thence Westerly along said North line to the point of beginning. JTS Riverside County, STEEN WEINOLD President HOTEL -La Quinta, California 92253 May 24, 1973 'Riverside County Planning Department' Hall of Records Riverside, California 92502 Gentlemen: (714) 564-4111 MAY 2 4 1973 f:iv'ci<,:Iu� COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION' DESENT' OFFICE In Re:Conditional Use Case No. 1477E Variance Case No. 1210E After due consideration, we, respectfully request that we be permitted to withdraw our applications for consideration of the subjects. Thank you. Yours very truly., Steen Weinold, Vice President cc:Mr. Harry Schmitz ON 9:00 A.M.' PRESENT: - ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING RIVERSIDE COUNTY EAST AREA PLANNING COUNCIL Room 403 s .46,209 Oasis Street Indio, California Council : •Senior. Planner : Associate Planner: Secretary: ABSENT: , Counci ra : Reel il, Side 1 , The adjourned regular meeting of the Est, Asa by Vice. Chan Paul Payne in Room 403 of the 46-209 Oasis Street, Indio, California at 9:10 mnpFES : E cer�ber 29 1972 and Jana rX 2et It Was, regularly moved by Councils Branson, duly carried that' t e minutes of December 290, JAL UARY 29, 1973 Kay Olesen Paul Payne Jonas Cohletr Sidney Branson Harry Schmitz Gerald Dupree Mary Jessup , Humberto Lopez Planning Council" was called to order Riverside County Office Building, , • Ann. androll call taken. 1973 seconded by " Coaaaeeilman ' Cohler, and 1972 and 'January 28, 1973 be approved. .(13 - 18) 9 :00' A,L. • PUBLIC HEARING (Contd. froa 11/30/72 and 12/29/72) ;TO. 1477-E Elkee Corporation Planned Residential Development and Real Estate Sales Office Deletion of Block Wall Zone R-2-8000 (sq. ft. lot area per • unit) ` and Zane R-5 Crum 0'49 0. La Qu1 to District Fourth Supervisorial District (Hearings opened at 9 :12 and at 9:13 A.M.:ere 9:25 A.M.) Property located on'the West side of Eisenhower Drive, ; mile North of 50th Avenue, in La eta continued to February 22, 1973 at PRESEN4ATIION: Mrs Steitz advised that spplic nt had written a letter, requesting continuance to the next regular meeting in February. MOTION: bt was regularly moved by Counellman Brunson, , secoruled by Councilman Cohler; an duly carried that Conditional Use Case No. 1477-E and Variance Case No. 1210-Ebe continued to February 22, 1973 et .9:25 A.M. • JANUARY 29, 1973 (19 a 92) P:_ r LIC HEARING rrLa.18.30 (C,P-S) PLOT PLAN NO. 1381 --APPEAL FROM CONDITIONS Eisenhower Medical Center. Property located on the Northeait corner Thrift Shop of Culver Drive and Highway 111 : rnnta ge Cathedral 'City Pala' Desert District Road, in Rancho Ma - 1 Fourth Su soz ial Di s Mr. Schmitz explained that the conditions of approval imposed by letter of December l5th included the standard clause requiring clearance from public agencies. The appeal was with'respect to the requirements of the Department of Fire Protection. Mr. Schmitz read the requirements of the Department of Fire Protection and the letter of appeal from the applicant. APPELLANT: William Juvonen, +project manager for Thrift Shop tom. Juvonen stated that the fire hydrant North of the parcel is on a 3" main and Cannot furnish the fire flow required by Fire Protection. There is one. across Highway 111 which can deliver approximately 1400 CPM, He added that three other. applicants have received relief from the Department of Fire Protection requirements and requested that they also be givens consideration. MOTION: It was regularly moved by Councilman Co iranson, and duly carried that thedi - ar ,a, those agencies from which clearances are re x ed. r y rlool 14es8,41, O .ar ,e a- I1 e 0 0 • sr 0 AO Councilman Protection ie deleted fro (Chairman Olesen arrived-draring' the precedinghex ing. and asked M. Payne to continue ::a chairman of the meeting.) ' ' (93 - 147) 9 :15 A.M. PUBLIC HEAR! 146 CONDITIONAL USE CASE NO Nick Jorgensen Planned Residential Development Zone R-3 (General Residential) Cathedral City - Palm Desert District Fourth Supervvisorial District (Hearing opened at 9:28 A.M. and closed at 9:37 A.M.) PRESENTATION: &r. Schmitz presented the subject application together with all maps pertinent thereto,ssurrounding property owners having previously been noti- fied 'according to the provisions of Ordinance No. 348. Mr. Schmitz stated that bare are several developments of this'nataire in the. area. The East Area Planning Council recently approved a conditional use permit just West ofthis site for the same applicant. This is an enlargement of that development. Mr Schmitz added that • this development would be consistent with the Cove Communities General Plan and that there would be no significantimpact on the environment. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO. an 0 0 Property located on the West side of Ocotillo Drive, North of Verba Santa Drive; Palm Desert -,The p1 :t:. pa , shows fouremits and a, . herapy pools to be integra d" ulith units to the West. `added ,that there'were no letters' of .,oppos .tion received. . (Vice ; Chia a a Payne asked tit all `pe soa s aishi to, give testiMony., either ' foror against, to rise and be,sworn.' In the absence of -Co@ ty Counsel, Mr, Payn adii&aatered:. the oath to all persons desiring to' give testimony.) ' PROPONENTS Bey. Slade, representing° Pilm Desire` Property Owners Assn., 32603 Hedgehog, PaA a John OutcaaIt 0' 7392E Highway 111, Palm se to Cailf. . (°.Slade; stated that P Ii Desert Property Owners' Association is pleased ,jith this development.- , Mr. Oiec nit. sta' ed that this is. an eextenaio"!; -of a project now Q :'add'$' eonstr tioi$. will Pare * a . s"iMilar typeof architecture. Thee- be ag no farther testimony,, the chairman declalAd the Public hearing closed at 9:37..a A.M. _ t� i . FINDINGS:: t.) Te p> o eet Is Compatible,. with adjaCeat property. 2) There would' ,not be any significant or adverse impact. 3) " The project ie 'cons .stew t with the. . Cove'Co nm Mtios Genera1' P : an„ `. N!ON: ' It ens gu 1y, ved by Cou cil an ®1eseh, ,:seconded by Councilman Brdnee n, nd .duly carried,that the East Area'Planning Council - recommend to Board of .Supervisors app 'oval of Conditional Use.. Case No. 1 9.Eo subject to cond .tions' as tepoiriOen4ed by, e. st f .v 1146a27), PU 1 ;IC ilEARING , V NCE` CASE Vie. 1219aE ,joseph Robles Lot Size: duotion ?one 11.4 Cone Family DwellitigsT Cathedral City panel Desesr".t District : Fourth Sep. rvisoria1 District .. Property located on the West aide. of Chariesuorth Drive, between Chanel Drive and Starlight Lane, `in Cathedral . City. (iear;°ing opened at 9 o 41 A.M. and closed at 1.608 A.M.). PRESENTATION: Mr. Schnitz presented the subject application. together r with a11; maps .pertinaent thereto, surrounding. property owners,having previously been . ,notified according to' tit. prov .lions` of grdinsn No 3 48. , Mr. Schmitz stated' 'that mwost of the 'gaud use in this area is single family residences. - Prop. 'ty is vacant. he . p 'oposa1. is td divide property into two Lots. Mr. Schmitz • ' ' added that then was,a precedent set in this area, as there are a 'large-n r - of lots with . substanda 'd, depth and thee ,would be no special pariVi1ege here, as proposed, . that .. others Inthe area do : not enjoy. Mr. SehMit z L read a letter from , • `' f _ • JANUA Y 29 9 i97 S- ' RiW. rside.Coaahiy f1c . Comt?ol :aad suggested that thaw requirement be II:twia hd by ,adding ,a cb fliti® a, 'stating g that+the pads, be arlifilliM of 12" above Ch'1eswovth ' Drive:. '' f ;Vie Council ehosald approve this `applioat .oar, (Vice:Chaireen Payne asoid that all persons, wishing to give testimony, either ' for' or adainst,.to• rim end be' sWern„ `Ve::Payne admraistexed the o;:+ th to all • persOBS desiring' to give ' testimony.) ) . PROPONENT:' • Robert Y6titoy 37153;.Ferber Dive, Cathedral City., .Calif. •,, t g, tt.'•��.h tito stated that- the g argue on the .lots Sow is close to 12" above Charles- . .• t�for yDrive; �` ' - .. , '� • OPPONENT: Jim Condon, 38285' Charlesworth Drive, Cathedral. City, Calif. Pam°. •Cod= stated, that: the mama access- to, foams" other lets southwesterly is • along • the storm channel at thekback'side• of this -property.; He added that there are s.four houses on the parcel to the Southwest and there are many people 'living in. this very 'si'a11, area. i o:..Condor read a letter •ira opposition from another ProPertY'otieer,on this street.; : , The letter r ems' fro i H G . Bruce Vandeg'ift a ne Schmitz read s..i=eport received fro' the Cathedral City Chamber of Coerce, which stated that '€tea Roble. 'shed. that `he would dedie: to , diatever is required to Provide aeoess •to the property facing on Channel R©ad. With this stipulatiora, they would• have' rad obJeetiora. • 8 .,Sehmiti stated that, if an easement were regUired oar ChaYa 1' Road, the St•:ff would have . to change its ' coxr aa •.: tiiora from approval to denial because of the ' reductiosa ,.£ s�e footage 'remaining ,in tb2 'lots (6000 sq., 't.) , • ire -be r^ ; rw Dirther test .ray, the chairman deelared the public hearing closed a g�sd8iA.' ,• FINDINGS: ,J) IVejeatild: alter the'eharaote' of 'the area. 2) Request constitutes a speoial ' privi1e ', since .a 20_! ,eaid :� width easement is necessary, it would reduce one f the sips, :o ,6000 sq. ft e , therebY setting s precedent. NOTION: e It 'as:e negu1a'1 / mime. by Cotuacilman Coh1er9 . aeoonded by Coltacilmen Olesen9 and day -carried that' the Est Area Plaailing Council recotme d to the- ' Board. of Supervisors derade1 .of, Var1e.nce Cade NO. 1219$ (277 " ® 351) 9:45 '' . M.s PUBLIC HEAR1H Frank H . Oaths . Property. located Soaath. of Pitahaya' Planned H esideaati .1 Development , between Sh dow P ountain Wive ` and Zone. H 3 . (General- Residential) . Highway 740 .in. Palm Desert Cathedral ° City - Palm Desert Dist�� t ;.. mnew.yo.a.w sea (H .,,g- opened- at 10:12 1.N. and cad at 1030 30 A.M.) •P SPA' `IOil: M. Satz presented the".subject ;application together with all, baps pertinent thereto,suremounding property camera having previously been notified according to - the provisions of Ordinance NO, 348He. Schmitz stated that the purpose of this application is to increase the size ;• ' ai development approved recently for the Rupee Corporation. " 'fitte. piot plan indicates 12 additional waits. He added th t staff is not recometaling a cul-de-sac, ° but the aase of the extension of theprivate street ' (Verba . S nta) . to Highway 7e3. No letters wereceived, either in .favor` or .in opposition to this project. • (Vice Chairman' Payne a asked ,that all persons" wishiet to give testimony, y© either for ,or against, to .ease- and be sworn, a Payne .ada inistered the 'oath to all persons -desiring to•:give testimony.) OPOg+ S e. , . tal.vey: Slade, 72603 Hedgehog, Palm Desert, C lif. Don Shay1ei, Pacific Rim, 73393 High y 3.13., Palsy Desert, Calif. We slack :atatesi that. he represented the•Palsa Desert Paoper ty..Duets Asssociatiort as d.th at ;tIvy have .approved the project.. Shay/er, representing the applicant, stated that `tjse units each have•teppprodi.m mately 1200 sqo. ft. - floor, .area.. ILle. stated . that the applicant agriees with the conditions except for clarification of No. 7 He -Mould' like to insert' the Words.; • 94as a7pal.vate street" at the. end of : the 'seuteface,regarding iMpiovement of Verbs Santa eas ssi `aa AlSOD. KOa Sh eyler asked that the Road Departaeaat °s: recommenda- tion for a out. de-sao not re . be requid. He stated that- they had discussed this natter.. with the Road 1*Firtavitik,pld that the Subdivision . Cowittee has agreed to . • this change. There being no furthe t r.10:30 • A.N. pp �7�,,�,,, p� p, }� �,,�, gyp. 9 �,,,a� ?e i 2S3�ti7e� o,. 1), he use -Would •ito 6 be3 . de6thii4ee fin&. to au. endihi property. 2)-. u e . d not result . , substantial : adverse , environmental impact. 3) The use woad be.compeitible with develop{ ant in the area. .. NOTION: It ;was : eg ular1y.Moved by Cor aacilea O1esen, seconded by COUaali Coh1er, and duly carried ied that tkm-" East Area Planning ,Council n e d to _t e ard of .Supervisors approval of Conditional Use Case No. 1449 E, subject to conditions as ' aided o . . . testio yo the ,chairman deal redo the public •Irae ari ,closed • ' RY 29, 1973 (352 » 356) Mr. Schmitz asked the Council to consider setting an extra meeting in March because of the large number of oases being accepted in the Planning Department. Re suggested that they might want to consider March 15th as a possible date, as that mould be equidistant from the scheduled meeting d= tee of February 22nd and March 29th„ It was the consensus of the Council that March 15th be considered as an extra neeting date. (357) It was regularly moved. by Councilman Ol eseaa 9 seconded by Councilman Branson, and duly carried that the East Area Planning Council adjourn to February 22, 1973 at 9:00 A.M. in Room 403, 46-209 Oasis Street, Indio, California. 6. May 31, 1973 viY2:21:C 1/n/,73, Y,,,/n/733 UF2 ce,e uns;z:n LO. en oide of u,:a of La ,1 lrY!: 47.22C:,1 Lt A, 4t L,0,1 tat a it 1:13guall!ly by CclucAla Bra, &.fty 0E 'Ac.„ 11',;..a:e.Caw Mb_ (232 - 20S) MUDITIOUAL USE ChSE WA. 1511-C heuni:h Miller Mobi/shcx2 nwk Zone 14-.2 Bernaaa Duaos District Fourth Suervit.f..orial Aistviut May 31,-1973 • (Co'atiotedfia t1etime, this dote) 1.?2,2pety located betuaen.Avarner Thal :.;',2•idSiltiflqfon. Street, approxieilately:: • 150 southerly of California Street, in Pc.am Deoit Couatr.,) Club:Estates', • CONTIMIANT:E Or MESENTA-TICO: ti ted the cpplicantls '-ev..7.sca1 plot - plan and stated that the mobilehoma vitrk it aada%?as oZ.R.ivrside (;omaty Liive nOt been iset. Ne iAded that the d.,;(isity exeneds .thi*:i - S units pm? a6i.e esiled'for on the Coverul Plan. • (Chia OleGan asked that. al Iprsowismishing to give teotimeuy, either for.or against, t0 rise egad he sworn. Mr. &ales adminitered 1.112 ooth to all persona desiring to give testimony.) PROPONENT; • Dick Kite, 73757 Highuay 111, Palm Desert, Calif„ representing' ' applicant M. Kite stated that he thought he should have received a list of what was required for this pion. Hr. Dupree stated that Me. Kite was told that the required to wake it adequate end was told that on Chairmsn 01e5,?n asked or. Kite if they planaed to asked if they would want -a contInuance. .Mr. Kite reduce the density and uould like a continuance. OPPONCNTS: plan was deficient end what was the day of submission. 1-educe the density, If so, he staLed that they did !Aim to George Haman. 42332 Washington Street, Palm Desert,. Calif. Victor Whitemere, 42705 Lcmisiana -Street, Palm Desert. Calif. Albert Barber, 77155 Louisiana Street, Ba/m Df.sert, Calif. Ira C. Puller, 77375 MinuesOta Street, Palm Dest, Calif. • Mr. Harman stated that he had 9 ocees adjoining this property ()IL the East and he was oppozed to a mobile park in this vicinity. , Mr. Whitelyaere stated that he felt that this parcel should be used as residential. Mr. Barber stated that he would like to see the parcel homes Mr. Fuller,stated that hit objection was the denalty4, not.be oppoSed to a mobilehcae psrkif It were not too NOTION: It was regularly moved by Councilman Branson, Cohler, and duly carried that Conditional Use Case No.. JUEZ 28, 1973 at 9;00 A.M. 6„ developed with one -family He added that he would dense. seconded by Councilman 1511- ;Ie continued to APRIL2'6 • 1973 4;5 • IN,VMs31:°. uth..vata; Irlitk7?d ..ELNI.vi 13130/7 2 1/29/V, 2/22/13, evaIDIKTIWAK,, USE; C.P..S'Z kal„ 1477 ASV:: Elkee CtU- t & De let:2.VA' .C.;.'Aioz-h. (TACT Zoae R-2.0011 (eq., f..„ Iot mitt) aad 11,- Lt CiA1.Y.A.,e, Bli,.3';;%".ic:i: • PuitLtth Hesi::,v'r-vi.,61•1 t(A: (Wg:!a-Virtg opf:!ud :36. P. afEl at 3:37 & con10,.nued to 1.2...ay 31; '1973 at 9 : 15 A .N.) ES MN:MR-4 :Mu.St-qtatit : stilted that a 1et-0,4,r had applicant „ f'..equeztiN a one,-oithCO at intiatv3e • 'MOTION: uzzi e reguiarly moved by Coancilroan Olesen, :seconded by Counti.141 Branson, andv iy carried tilat Conditlonal Vat? Case No. • 1477-f: and Varicitwe Ca4f2 121U-r; continuad to E.4ay 31, 1973 •at 9:15 A.M. 11.• WO Mo. Oa O. CO •o. 6010 12/9/72 V2V73) L.tojated:on the West •6ae,z, of Drf'' 5i1O•ii,lortti of 50til in • been received frothe Elbee Corporation. 208 S. LaSalle Street Room J000 Chicaso, Illinois' NOTICE OF CONTNUED NEARING • COMITIOHAL USE CASE NO. 1477.4 • 17Vair-Cbrlt5MTEr-7--- Planned Res. Dev. & R. E. Sales Office fUIocRWULL o`r; "Y* ft.1q1 —crvintiterwrret• ...Getu..._ • This is to advise you that the public hearing in connection with the subject . . • case has been continued to • '.6kA• PAC) on 19 in —rr— 401. Kilmroido-cousity-, HHS:nlr 2/28/7300: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Wm. R. Livingstone, Planning Director 46-209 Oasis Street, Room 304 Indio, California 92201 Secretary Riverside office La Quints Chamber of Commerce Coachella Volley County Water District NealthlDepartment Dept.'ef 81dg. & Safety - Land Use Div. County Road Department Dept. of Fire Protection (Perris) J. f. Davidson Aasociates • Robert Chalmere • 9 :00) A.M. PRESENT: Councilmen: amALAa N 1M ti y l3IJM3I3f' C:OU °iY EAST ARW°r'.•A. ?'L VNiEG C0ib%:CIL Room 403, 46-200 Oasis Str:,a t Litho, California Ray Olesen Sidney Bra.ion .1i urberto Lope,4 Paul Payne :Jonas Cohler Associate Plaer,aer: Gerald Dupree Sucretamy: Mary; Jessup Reel tat, Side 1 The regular meeting of the East Area Planning Council aas• caller} to order` by Chairman Olesen in Room 403 of the Riverside County Office • Building, 46-209 Oasis Street, ..I radio, California at 9:10 A.M. and the roll call taken. (04 - 1.5) 9:00 A.O. PUBLIC }BEARINGS (Continued CONDITIONAL USE CASE NO. 1477-E VARIANCE . CASE NO. 1210-E Elkee Corporation Planned. Residential Development and Real Estate Sales Office Deletion of Block Wall (TRACT .4 n; 9ti(i) Zone R-2-8000 (sq. ft. lot area a per mit) and Zone R-5 La Quinta District .Fourth Sul:e>t visorri al_ District from 11/30/72„ 12/29/72,. 1/29/73, 2/22/7.3) Property located on the West side of Eisenhower Drive, mile North of 50 h Avenue in La Quinta (li2ar1ngs opened at 9:10 A.M. and at (1:11 A.N. V?7re? continued to April 26, 1973 at 1:45p.n.) PRESENTATION: L1r. Dupree stated that. although the staff report had originally stated that the applicant wished to withdraw the cases, a letter has now bzen received that the applicant would like a north is continuance to allow a revised, deaign to be prepared. A"OTION: It was regularly eased by Councilman Cohler. seconded by Councilman Branson, and duly carried that Conditional Use Case: No. 1477-E and Variance Lase' No. 1210-E be continued to April 26, 1973 at 1:45 P.M. 1 Y rx l h r a, ... P.O. BOX 77 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA Dlamond 7.4111 MARCH 24, 1973 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HALL or RECORDS RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 GENTLEMEN:. RE:CONDITIONAL USE CASE N. 1477E VARIANCE CASE No. 1210E WE FEEL FURTHER STUDY OF THE PLANS SHOULD BE'MADE•BEFORE'' • BEING SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THEREFORE WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THIS CASE eEOONTINUED 'UNTIL.YOUR NEXT REGULAR MEETING. SW:FM CC:MR.,HARRY SCHMITZ/ SINCERELY, ELKEE CORPORATION .lip- STEEN WEINOLD VICE;PRSIDENT' ECEIIVEI MAR 2 8 1973 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. DESERT OFFICE • • LUXURY HOMES — IDEAL DESERT LOCATIONS (30G - 310) 9 :25 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING (Continued CONDITIONAL USE CASE N0. 1477-C VARIANCE CASE tom. ' 1210-E E1kee Corporation Planned Residential Development and Real Estate Sales Office Deletion of Block Wall (TRACT # 49366)_- Zone R..2..8U0O ( � ..ft. lut area unit) _ana3 Zo a It�S La Qiil.nta District "ourth 8a-irirvisoriai District (Hearing opened at• 10:17 A.M. and at at 9:00 A.M.) Per from FEBRURY. 22., 1973 11/30/72, 12/29/72, 1/29/73) .Property located on the West side of Eisenhower Drive,k mile North of 50tth Avenue in La Qndinta 10:18 A.M. was continued to March 29, 1973 PRESENTATION: Mr. Schmitz advised that the applicant has requested a continuance. to the March ►7 : e ting „. ' MOTION: It was regularly moved by Councilor.n Lopez, seconded by Councilsmmn Payne, and duly carried that Conditional Use Case No. 1477-E and Variance Cate No. 11210..E be continued to March 29, 1973 et 9:00 A.M. 4. La Quinta District • Fourth Supervisorial District • VARIANCE CASE NO, E.A.P.C. Hearing Agenda Item ## ..'6 Continued from: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPART ENT, . STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUANCE to March 29, 1973, Based on the following findings: 1) Applicant has requested a month's continuance. HHS:mj Date of Staff Report: 2/14/73 1210 E Date: 2/22/73 11/30/72,.12/29/72 1/29/73 9:00 A.M. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING RI ' : S I»E COUNTY EAST AREA PLAMIANG cow= Room 403, 46 -209 OLIsis Street Indio, California MESE:MT: Cou aa:il n: Senior Pla r'aer : A seue iste Planne try : Secretary: WENT: Councilman: Reel 11 Side 1 The adjourned regular meeting of The East Area Planning Council was called.to order by - Vioe► Chairman Paul Payne in Rouse 403 of the Riverside County Office Building,. 46-209 Oasis Street, Indio, California at 9:10 A.M. and the well call taken. ' IY 29 1973 pea:eibe; 29 p 1972 and January 26, 1973 Kay 0l a sen Paul Payne' Jonas Cohn ers° Sidney* Branson. ,}terry Schmitz Gerald .Dupree ylary 4epsup • ?ftztaberto Lopez. • • It was regal= 'ly moved by Council Branson, seconded by Councilman Uhler,. and duly carried that tine minutes of December 29, 1972 and J r zary 20, 1973 40. approved. (13 - 18) 9:00 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING (Contd. CONDITIONAL WE CASE NO. 1477-8 VARIANCE CAC NO. 12104E E1kee t o 'pu atiora Planned Residential Development and Real Esttai:.. Sales Office Deletion of block Wall Zone R-2-80(10 (sig. ft lot area per unit) end Zone R-5 (tAT 0 490) La Ctr iota 1D st ict Fourth taksisorial District from 11/30/72 :;nd 12/29/72).. Property 1oc:;.ted, on txa • West s: de of Eisenhower Drive, file North of 500 . Avenue, in La . lu$nta (Hearings G :Rted at 9:12 and at 9 :13 A.M. were continued to February 220 1973 at 9:2S A.M.) PRESEN 'A210: J:; Ur. Schmitz advised that the applicant had written a letter 3 requesting continuance to the next regular meeting in February. ' MOTION It •Oxus regularly moved by Councilman Branson, seconded by Councilman Coh1ea°, a h duly Carried that Conditional Use Case M o. 1477-E and VarUnop Case • No. 12/0-E 3K: continued ed to February 224 1973 at 9:2S A.P . • Cathedral City - Palm Desert District VARIANCE CE CASE NO., 1210-E E.A.P.C. Hearing Agenda Item: 2 Continued from: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STATT REPORT RECOI IENDATIUN : CONTINUANCE, to February 22, 1973, Based on the following findings: 1) Applicant requested continuance to rebruary meeting° FACTS: See Staff Reports of 11/30/72 and 12/29/72 HHS:GISI :CSB:mj Date of Staff Report:, 1/19/73 • Date; 1/25/73 11/30/72 12/29/72 • OEC2MEa K972 Kj. ':Al2atc:d a of Ei..,;.m.-s?v ihoWth, ncak E6L4"t, U?fIcQ of !AAh A,odc,: in L1.44.;*,i'ita j7;r2bia',:& I:1„ (11K7 4!;;363 (8,U00 A. loT. vinA'l and Zom! LA 6uLnta fAswsl"vtortal DAte4et Lpe:v,:d at 10:k5 A.M. ,1!nd 6t 10:al was continued to Jy i7: t 9:UO A.0) PRESMIATWW: Schwita mad lettr received fa tkapplicLr.t7g Ji,:rOneer ttiat tlayse cases bz 1.5ntint;4-?d to the January ineeting to e.1_14 tioe for El1.pavation o.aO. evaluatin of an Envivon•ootal lavat Re9ert. MOT1'.0A: It anaird by Collaullt, Dv4gnson,:iecrunded by C.minclJman LoLie.z„ .?.aa duly cavried that Ce.iitiunui Use Case No. 1477-E ciid V4Piame Caso e,Antinuci.d to jumAary 1073 at 0;00 A.M. 41.0 IMO OA 03 00 03 0. 04 Cathedral City - Palm Desert Zoning District Fourth Supervisorial District TRACT # 4066 RIVERSIDE COIF PLANNING STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION: C!Oti It UANCC, to January 25, 1973 Based on the following findings: 1) No Environmental Impact Report submitted 2) Applicant indicated a desire to continue FACTS: See Staff Report of 11/30/72 ANALLSIS : Other Data: IDIS:GWD:CSB:eilw Date of Staff Report: 12/18/72 Variance Case No, 1210-'E E,A,P,C, Hearing Date: 12/28/72 Agenda Item: 6 Continued from: 11/30/72 DEPARTMNT• Applicant was contacted by phone and stated a letter of continuance wea forthcoming. 476.-229) ,.3 : to A.M. J JLI : cUAf'+ITION`s ., CASC 114J C.!2i3E NO 12�A.:./•-;> • L..k€:: Corpa'rati' .n • P .ismod 8m` sideatical DcAi i lL'ii. ,. and Aeal Estate Sales Offie ('..Yr•ayt a 4960 Deletion of is'. ac k Wall iZL`oe R-2..tf 080 o'fjoosq. ft. lot area perunit) and `one R-5 La 2)3 int L istrict • Fourth Sooervisoriel District UUVLOBER SO :11972 Pip tyv located on.the Wet aide ' . of Eisenhower Drive, ni le t'k th of 5Oth Avenue, in La Quinta . (Hearing opened at 9 : 43 J.. '1.. aind at 9 : 59 A.M. was continued to December •28, 1972 at 9:45 A.M.) PRESENTATION: Er. Schmitz rr ' se 'tod the subject applications together with all maps pertinent thereto, surrounding property owners having previously been notified according to the provisions of Ordinance ` No.' 348. x'. Schultz stated that staff feels that there will be au environmental impact. He stated that thyre were no /otters of orzpositio€a reaa:ive 1. He added that there Is., a minor drainage problesn the ;site, a major flood problem in the general. La d:su:tnta area, an I five proteetion;requih"1. ment3 are considerable. ide?rable. (cLat:t€" enan CD_ e:, n asked that all porsons wish is to ;Live testimony, y, either for oo against, to mist and De : sworn. Mb. Oles'e a in the b a'sua of Conn' CtSun,3 ' .' adratai6tered the: oath to ail persons desiring to give testi:m1e4yo.) PROPONENTS: S: Steen Wei. of , vise p'b°esi 3, apt o:!f £ikee Corp. o Obs°egos Cow`« , La Quints„ Calif. B00 Ith,Par, J. F. Daviy` :.an & Associates, Riverside, Calif_ Mr. Weinold stated that an enviranatentwL i. il,dat report was not ready._ i ; ex otated that4LKb:i`y. could bt'. ready by ba cafll'a ' 15 tg ne a M. MOTION: c A) was, w :cs:� regularly moved by Co�!2 `.�t���1!"i:�i� �°i33i.:3�ii�'!fl secondedseconded?j �roYBt.acili;ian Cohller, and duly car.°f'iad that Conditional Use Case No, 147 e'..C. and V ranc Case 3`v` . 12iO $r, be . coa nnk d tc. December 28, 19 2 at 9 : 4 4.. ICE OF FOLIC $:Jib ICE IS W_CAE';.Y I'6eN tbet a pv2:It-ie [-reeirsz6gE.., e': Fe?.-.._R East .. Area P3.ami Council on 4Y64". appli iCsitim oLE g tzee 5 tt v"Rc, , l_ tc,T Rivareide Conte Ecning Ordinance an Ordinance 537c County L y ;Planning c a Fle m .: u;: este.4'*-.�.eh a placated`r.4ssidential develep and real e kat� ..eless of a 'an i Et' t s:: '. i ive •o': develogr...4eat girds in Ione : a2-ViGt7 .. tiple 'Amity •-- 8.53U tv,4. ft. i t) Open Avec Combining 2-Zone e s �ine .op . tilt on props-P:1V z :3 .. (3.. :. 4 side ®f Uncut -otter .`OzAve„ atile North of 5i.ls',tt AV ems :in ti:: '.y. Quint L' ar.:e'. U La_l ► describe as -ic.€ : A portion of the .East .half of Section 36v °,`.SS. R.OEc 42,B,61.1d -Said public hearing. will be held - on ThW°� El�. 'mltsde er 9. w d" a 6o•-:Lc • • Bride ....County mice.. Bu$ 46.409 :pee :Street s, R a a r+ei10„ E4lifernia t. ' et • ' t ism and place -pertinent testimony will be laara,. ,. RI;ASIDE 'C's" Y .S.ASE A'REs -:suea11GCOUNCIL : dtn.d J'io i ta.ki if Y e 9224 1 • Ile (71 347-85 .4 £. End'. 27 November .9 197 rni Cathedral City - Palm Desert District Fourth Supervisorial District TRACT NO. 4966 VARIANCE CASE NO. 1210-E E.A.P.C. Hearing Date: 11/30/72 Agenda Item # 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Based on the following findings: 1) Unusual shape, size and topography of parcel located next to a mountain. 2) Hardship created by the requirement not serving any purpose. FACTS: 1. Applicant: 2. Type of Request: 3. Purpose of Request; 4. ' Location: 5. -Parcel Size: 6. Existing Roads:. . 7. Existing Land Use: 8. Surrounding Land Use: 9. Terrain: 10. Existing Zoning: 11. Surrounding Zoning: 12. History: Elkee Corporation Deletion of block wall requirement, Because of mountainous terrain, not necessary to protect by a block wall. . West side of Eisenhower Drive, lj mile Werth of 50th Avenue in La Quints 66 acres Section 36, T.5S, R.6E Eisenhower Drive is a dedicated County road.m4d pneed; ; Avenida Fernando is a private road West of Eisenhower Drive and is paved. Vacant Residential subdivision, La Quinta Country Club and hotel Rocky, coarse sand, mountainous and hilly moderate wind erosion, soave . apparent flooding - the area proposed for development is a dry lake bed. R-2e` iultiple Family). and R-5 (Open Area Qombi Residential Development) • W-2 (Controlled Development). and R-1. (Single Family Residential) W-2 prior to November, 1972, when the Board of • Supervisors approved Change of Zone # 1511, making the area R�2 and:R-5. ing Page 1 of 2 Variance Case No; ' 1210-E Page 2. 13. General Plan Elements: 14. Plot Plan Description: 15. Agency Recommendations': . Road Department: Coachella Valley County Water District: ANALYSIS: 1) Compatibility and Potential Effect:' HHS:CSB:GWD:mj Date of Staff Report: 11/27/72 Land Use - low density -.3 to 5,units per acre 186 units, real estate'office, clubhouse; recreation area, and other amenities;:` Recommend dedication on Eisenhower, curbs, gutters,. tie-in paving. Recommend all buildings to be constructed at' 46.5 feet elevation for flood,control.purposes.. The adjacent mountains are not necessary' to be screened by a block • VARIANCE CASE NO. 1210-E Elkee Corporation Deletion of Block Wall Requirement Cathedral City - Palm Desert District EAST AREA PLANNING COUNCIL COLDITIONS PROPOSED November 30, 1972 1. The development of the premises shall. conform substantially with that as. shown on plot plan marked Exhibit "A" on file with Vaa'ianee Case Ho. 1210-E •in the office of the Riverside. County Planning Department unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. 2. This approval shall be used within 3 years after final proceedings before the Board of Supervisors, otherwise it shall become null and void and of • no effect whatsoever. By "use" is meant coordination with Conditional Use. Case No. 1477-E •and compliance with the subiivision requirements. STEEN WEINOLD President HOTEL -La Quinta, California 92253 1714t 564-4111 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION . February 14,.1973 Riverside County Planning Department Hall of Records-, Riverside,_Californi a 92502 Gentlemen;,. Re; Conditional Use Case No..1477E. . Variance Case No. 1210E'• Once more we find it necessary to ask you'to be kind enough to postpone the hearing on the subject for one - more month.'. cc:Mr. Harry Schmitz Respectfully yours, ELKEE CORPo TION Steen Weinold Its Vice President 1 copy sent to desert office r 1.A.r• 10, Sce p�ii t ,,hh 6yisv l:.v�:, � ' Ca liiLltTY EAST ARLA P3•.1' M liC Calm kL 46-2ot) 0a;3j ff et, 3'.ocFm 304..2 Land Use Div CONDITIONAL USE 4* Elkee Corp 208 S. LaSalle St. Chicago, Illinois 1477-E & VARIANCE , Room 1000 60604 ''ow'_ Q." :iiei`: nts Z•vxol l:ttadilt; f:as Nov, 1 1972:. Planned Residential Dev., Real Estate Office Waiver of Block Wall La Quinta District ar,4 requested prier ito Ma Public hearing on this mattcra° will be held on. „•_,,,100( wish to he present° The e ^-&,s_;;:'.!U y staff meeting will Fes' held Ors 11/20J.I2...,...r.D at 9 : 00 AM, COME6wi3:S o 1. 27 Looks like a big cul-de-sac. Narrow streets Earthquake fault in area, Private streets should have street named reviewed by Land Use and shown on final recorded map so this division can comply *ith the county street address ordinance. No Complaints. should' you for emergency vehicles. E0 NOV .161972 RIVERSIDE' COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 4 Date MAg2mber 1$ 1972 S.i. ; wd — - (t to :-a original o P1ann zg Dept, 46-2O9 Oasis Street, Room 3094, India li.f . ' 92201 (714) 47 - 8 511, Ex;' , 218 HHS :oaaj 10/3/7 L i. 'i l'... ... ./.:i +. �.% � i.1 t• L. •S K!1VO f. c; l..V� ,e'.. a 46 :?i:69 ei;s i', S'c.f.o:'%, 10czm 304 Cal . j.'orni.a Nov. 10; 1972 O Health Dept. SLJB,JEtT CONDITIONAL USE # 1477-E & VARIANCE # 1210-E Elkee Corp. 208 S. LaSalle St., Room 1000 Estate Office Chicago, Illinois 60604 Waiver of Block Wall La Quinta District OUC comments atml. i`t-'C;ltSb.`1.2nri.at or are t"+.'iti?i3Wd-prior to _ 11/17172 Planned Residential Dev., Real ihe publ c` .ri.n .►, on this.mttE,r on 11/30/72 slaa�tl.d you . �3 , 'Az, c �.�. r } wish to v<. present, ��•�� 1.i':,., i,��'t_c�'•=-�.;c:�ri;:.� staff J:,.,�-��4.�n�; wf i,l be 2:c^1d a:,:n 11/20/72 at 9:00 AM, cu.,,,wi,.;Easi The Department of Public Health of Riverside County.hasreceived the application filed by Elkee Corporation.to establish a planned residential development on southwest side of Eisenhower Drive in the La Quinta district of the unincorporated territory of Riverside County. This department has no definitive information at this time regarding methods by, which sewage may be disposed of and water may be obtained. The tract of land is in an area which is considered very poor for individual sewage disposal. It is therefore requested this information be furnished the Health Department in the tentative map prior to filing in the Planning Commission Office. Under these conditions this department has no objection .to the granting of Conditional Use Case No. 1477-E and'Variance No. 1210-E for a planned residential development. LWR:vs cc: D.R. Boling Dist. 14 D.3t.1 f/ / i' d Very truly yours,.. G.D. Carlyle Thompson, M.D. M.P.H. District Health Officer Lloyd 1,4 Rogers Chief Sanitarian Environmental. Health • (Ro tw`tl ovis u&1. to Piz ni Oep t: _ 46-20/ F;;;tC ' 1 itc s► ' lT i1 r, i:am I fie,. 92201 I{US :rtmj 10/3/72 TO: SUBJECT,` 11... :F'iS ID E CAMAY d EAST A '► tt J1q.4A N.r'yUG C:ORii►`!dl S,o 11•t ..209 0 1s a i.h`rl!e ,• Roc:f 1 304 Qy it•7 Nov. 10, 1972 Road Dept. CONDITIONAL USE # 1477-E & VARIANCE Elkee Corp. 208 S. LaSalle St., Room 1000 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Your cOi?.g iE hits and it E.°i� ?dtidtil Baf:ti rioi The ptbile i ctr. n ox 'this matter # 1210-E Planned Residential Dev., Real . Estate Office Waiver of Block Wall La Quinta District a.:r + re E',l;;,'e ed vr:f or to .11/17/72 will be i ctid on ,11/30/72 . houl.d you wish to. be present, The 1nter:?agi »oy staff ;ramec:!'agwill be heiA of 11/20/72 at 9:00 AM C( NME S Recomrnend dedication of right-of-way on Eisenhower to conform to master plan. 'Recommend Installation of curbs, gutters, and tie-in navinn, if existing vertical alignment on Elsenhctvrcr All nrovi& satisfactory. drainage. • DEPT.. Date -,...,. 11%1Wig Sigewrd .._ ....... cb u R. Brown.Desert Office En sneer turn or i,l git to planning Dept. Igo -du, � :��n. :meet, noon su4, Ino,, C411f. 92201 (714) 347=-8S11, Cxi. 278 • niECE:JIWErrli NOV 3 1972 I I. `' PLANNING COMMISSION DESERT OFFICE miS 1.0/3/7 2 Indio Administrative Center 46-209 Oasis Street, Room 304 Indio, California 92201 (719'447-S513. Ext. 470. •• • November 10. 1972 HHS:1658D0 • n Elkee Corporation 203 S. LaSalle Street, Room 1000 Chicago, Illinois RE: ConditionalUse Case No. 14774. • Variance Case No. V10-E Gentlemen: Please find enclosed a copy of lcgal notification in connection with your application for a conditional use permit to.establish.0 planned residential development and real estate orrice and for a variance to permit deletion of block wall in the La Quenta District. The infor- mation for posting the Notice of Hearing .is enclosed. - It is suggested that you be present or represented at this hearing. Failure to do so may be construed as a waiver of your right to present additional evidence. • , In the event you appoint someone to represent you at the hearing, letter 61g:fled:by yourgiving such authorization must be Op f4e 'lath. • • • the Planning Department -at the time of the hearing. • $•• . •„ ., • ,• . . , . • '! Yours very truly.. • , r . , • RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT . R..4ivingstone Planning Director . .• • Harry H. Schmitz - Senior Planner HHS:nlw Emits. 0 cc: giverside.office