Loading...
2007 Engineering & Traffic Surveyi i W I LLDAN Serving Public Agencies December 3, 2007 Mr Nick Nickerson Public Works Department City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Subject' 2007 Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Mr Nickerson 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405 Industry, California 91746-3497 562I908-6200 fax 562/695-2120 wwwwilldan corn As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 56 street segments in the City of La Quinta These segments were last surveyed in January 2002, and require an update to comply with the 5-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City's arterial and collector street system A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated September 2006 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of La Quinta and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study Very truly yours, WILLDAN i Vanessa P Traffic Eni Enclosure Onoz T E ineer 16393/LD1 & Rpt �r9: ` Fi No. 2341 Exp. (,-,-30 0 8AIFF1�i Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1-2 Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey SURVEY CONDITIONS Survey Locations Data Collection Speed Data , Collision Data Field Review Data ANALYSIS Criteria Results and Recommendations Table 1-Segments With Higher Recommended Speed Limits Table 2-Summary of Recommendations Segments with Special Conditions LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code APPENDIX A - Segment Data Street Segment Sheets Radar Speed Distribution Forms APPENDIX B - Survey Equipment Used APPENDIX C — Speed Limit Map 2-3 !I 4 4 4 5 5 V 6 6-7 7 8-10 11-17 18 18-23 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of La Quinta This Engineering and Traffic Survey presents recommended speed limits for 56 street segments in the City of La Quinta Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices These surveys must be updated every 5,7 or 10 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC) The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated September 2006 The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Sheriff's Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course {CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(1)] Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 10 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)] These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated September 2006 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code The Code further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey 1 Measurement of prevailing speed, 2 Accident history, and 3 Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist Posted speed limits are established primanlyto protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property " The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions Englneenng and Traffic Survey City of La Qutnta The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated September 2006 specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as follows Speed Sampling Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions Therefore, a "basic speed limit" is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed For example, if the 85th percentile speed is 48 mph, the basic speed limit is 50 mph If the 85th percentile speed is 47 mph, the basic speed limit is 45 mph Engineering and Traffic Survey 2 City of La Quinta Collision History Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions A segment that has an above -average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists The collision rate for each of the 56 surveyed street segments is provided in Appendix A, Part III, and Table 2 Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit It is important to note that the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated September 2006 recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit Engineering and Traffic Survey 3 City of La Quinta SURVEY CONDITIONS SURVEY LOCATIONS The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of La Quinta The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following 1 Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence 2 Minimum visibility restrictions 3 Non -congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways 4 Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle DATA COLLECTION Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 56 locations during the months of February, March, and May 2007 Speed Data Radar speed measurements were conducted at 56 locations during February, March, and May 2007 All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments and separate surveys were made for divided roadways Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta Collision Data Collision data was obtained from the City's SWITRS electronic collision database Forthis study, collision data was used from the latest (3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2004 to December 31,2006 ) The collision rates for the 56 segments are expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM) To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate lE Axl,000,000 W 65 days xlxv year A = Number of midblock collisions over time period R = Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles) t = Time Period Covered (in years) ! = Length of Segment (miles) v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic) The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate The average statewide collision rates was obtained from 2002 Collision Data on California State Highways Field Review Data A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors 1 Street width and alignment (design speed), 2 Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics, 3 Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns, 4 Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on -street parking, 5 Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices, 6 Visibility obstructions, 7 Land use and proximity to schools, 8 Pedestrian and bicycle usage, 9 Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions, and 10 Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver Engineenng and Traffic Survey 5 City of La Quinta ANALYSIS CRITERIA Survey data was complied and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated September 2006 Some of the criteria used are. A The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic The "basic speed limit" is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed B The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed C The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile These average collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of La Quinta RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2 In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358 5 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions Engineering and Traffic Survey 6 City of La Qurnta The recommendations contained In this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code) This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended posted speed limit changes and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments TABLE 'I STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES STREET FROM TO EXISTING NEW Avenida La Fonda Washin ton Street Desert Club Drive 25 30 Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico Avenue 52 25 30 Avenida Bermudas Avenue 52 Calle Tecate 40 45 Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas Washin ton 45 50 Avenue 54 Madison Street Jefferson Street 50 55 Avenue 54 Madison Street Monroe Street 50 55 Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive Avenida Bermudas 35 40 Calle Tampico Eisenhower Drive Washington Street 30 40 Calle Tampico Washington Street Park Avenue 30 35 Calle Tecate Avenida Bermudas Avenida Madero 30 35 Caleo Bay Drive Avenue 47 Avenue 48 25 30 Dune Palms Road Fred Waring Drive Miles Avenue 40 45 Dune Palms Road Highway 111 Avenue 48 5o 45 Eisenhower Drive Washington Street Calle Tampico 40 45 Eisenhower Drive Calle Tampico Avenida Bermudas 35 40 Jefferson Street North City Limit Fred Waring Drive 50 55 Jefferson Street Westward Ho Drive Highway 111 50 55 Madison Street Avenue 54 Avenue 58 45 50 Madison Street Avenue 58 Avenue 60 45 50 Park Avenue Avenue 50 Calle Tampico 30 40 Westward Ho Drive Dune Palms Road Roadrunner Lane 25 35 Westward Ho Drive Adams Street Dune Palms Road 25 30 Engineering and Traffic Survey 7 City of La Quinta TABLE 2. SPEED/ACCIDENT DATA SUMMARY TABLE _W-4r r 3 1 Adams Street Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue 0 50 N/S 52 43-52 79 11,151 210 000 45 45 } 2 Adams Street Mites Avenue to F4i hwa 111 0 93 NIS 51 42-51 77 16,109 210 006 45 45 3 Adams Street Hi hwa 111 to Avenue 48 0 57 NIS 52 42-51 69 9,836 210 049 45 45 + 4 Airport Boulevard Madison Street to Monroe Street 1 00 ENV 54 42-51 57 2,290 210 000 NP 55 Closest 85th 5 Avenida La Fonda Washington Street to Desert Club Drive 040 E!W 35 1 25-34 66 1,313 305 000 25 30 w 6 lAvenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 036 1 NIS 33 24-33 73 6,449 335 000 25 30 7 Avenida Bermudas Avenue 52 to Calle Tecate 1 75 NIS 50 39-48 62 6,549 335 040 40 45 * 8 Avenida Montezuma Avenida Carranza to Calle Potrero 209 NIS 31 22-31 65 757 305 1 73 NP 30 Closest 85th 9 jAvenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street 076 ENV 51 40-49 62 4,301 210 000 45 45 10 Avenue 50 Washington Street to Jefferson Street 1 50 1 ENV 55 44-53 69 9,339 210 000 50 50 + 11 Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas to Washington Street 053 EIW 1 49 40-49 71 18,786 210 028 45 50 Closest 85th 12 lAvenue 52 Washington Street to Jefferson Street 1 58 E/W 57 48-57 59 13,871 2 10 004 50 50 * 13 Avenue 54 Madison Street to Jefferson Street 1 096 E/W 58 47-56 60 12 857 210 1 000 50 55 14 Avenue 54 Madison Street to Monroe Street 100 NV E 53 42-51 61 3,513 1 75 fl 00 50 55 Closest 85th 15 lAvenue 58 Jefferson Street to Madison Street 1 00 E1W 50 37-46 53 1,626 1 75 000 NP 50 Closest 85th 16 Avenue 58 Madison Street to Monroe Street 100 EIW 55 39-48 51 2,172 1 210 000 NP 55 Closest 85th 17 Avenue 60 Madison Street to Monroe Street 1 00 1 ENV 57 43-52 65 2,184 1 205 000 NP 55 Closest 85th 18 lAvenue 60 Madison Street to West End 030 E11N NIA NIA N/A 15 NIA NIA NP NIA Unpaved L19ICalle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 025 ENV 44 35-44 64 7,664 335 000 35 40 Engineering and Traffic Survey * See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments 8 City of La Quinta J _ —1 ____J I 1 TABLE 2: SPEED/ACCIDENT DATA SUMMARY TABLE x " 1 I' �sn " F �� WSW f�� M� e b S �+bf"P?f � S' x. � '4 1 aP ` A : - ``l � �p <� �?-�" i�' �,,'z� 1 u^.A ii` � ?� a. � t 4a .ti: as � r. �r w..e.« ain , we�a�r xx xi- , � . • , s A . a.' �- � a's - Y 20 Calle Tam ico Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street 074 EMI 43 34-43 66 13,651 335 054 30 40 21 Calle Tampico Washington Street to Park Avenue 050 EIW 42 34-43 81 1,913 305 000 30 35 22 Calle Tecate Avenida Bermudas to Avenida Madero 044 EIW 36 21-30 48 2,067 305 000 30 35 Closest 85th 23 Caleo Bay Drive Avenue 47 to Avenue 48 055 NIS 31 23-32 81 2,252 305 000 25 30 Closest 85th 24 Desert Club Drive Avenue 52 to 1,300' N/O Calle Tampico 056 NIS 35 1 23-32 73 1,764 1 305 000 30 30 + 25 Dune Palms Road Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue 050 1 NIS 49 38-47 78 6,393 210 000 40 45 26 Dune Palms Road Miles Avenue to Highway 111 100 1 N/S 48 38-47 66 9,163 210 1 010 45 45 27 Dune Palms Road Highway 111 to Avenue 48 051 NIS 1 45 34-43 1 68 10,911 210 000 50 45 Closest 85th 28 Eisenhower Drive Washington Street to Calle Tampico 1 80 EM 49 38-47 1 63 10,739 335 005 40 45 } 29 Eisenhower Drive Calle Tampico to Avenida Bermudas 1 88 N/S 45 33-42 60 9,936 335 039 35 40 30 Fred Waring Drive Washington Street to Jefferson Street 202 1 EfW 53 1 45-54 75 18,553 1 210 002 1 50 50 31 Jefferson Street North City Limit to Fred Waring Drive 051 NIS 58 49-58 1 72 21,100 240 000 50 55 + 32 Jefferson Street Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue 050 N/S 56 45-54 60 21,519 240 000 50 50 33 jJefferson Street Westward Ho Drive to Highway 111 050 1 NIS 54 46-55 64 32,710 1 240 017 1 50 55 Closest 85th 34 Jefferson Street Highway 111 to Avenue 54 351 N/5 1 58 47-56 1 68 22,667 240 001 55 55 35 Jefferson Street Avenue 58 to Quarty Lane 026 NIS 39 26-35 63 1,231 1 30 000 None 40 Closest 85th 36 Madison Street Avenue 54 to Avenue 58 200 NIS 56 45-54 57 %099 210 000 45 50 37 Madison Street Avenue 58 to Avenue 60 1 02 N1S 56 44-53 52 2,855 210 000 45 50 38 Miles Avenue lWashington Street to Jefferson Street ±1 67 EIW 54 43-52 1 69 10,796 210 000 50 50 Engineering and Traffic Survey See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments 9 City of La Quinta I I I TABLE 2: SPEEDIACCIDENT DATA SUMMARY TABLE 39 Monroe Street Avenue 52 to Avenue 54 099 NIS 56 44-53 61 4,523 1 75 Goo NP 55 Closest 85th 40 41 Monroe Street Monroe Street Avenue 54 to Airport Boulevard Airport Boulevard to Avenue 58 1 00 101 N/5 NIS 56 53 46-55 41-50 55 58 5,524 4,677 1 1 75 210 000 000 1 NP NP 55 55 Closest 851h Closest 85th 42 Monroe Street Avenue 58 to Avenue 60 1 01 NIS 55 42-51 49 2,641 175 000I NP 55 Closest 85th 43 Monroe Street Avenue 60 to Avenue 62 1 of NIS 60 1 43-52 52 3,348 1 75 000 NP 60 Closest 85th 44 Palm Royale Drive Washin ton Street to Fred Waring Drive 060 E/W 28 1 20-29 76 1,809 305 000 NP 30 Closest 85th 45 Park Avenue Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 050 NIS 46 35-44 66 3,103 305 000 30 40 i 46 Sagebrush Avenue Washington Street to Date Palm Drive 025 EIW 34 26-35 58 1,304 305 1 000 NP 35 Closest 85th 47 Washington Street Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue 063 NIS 55 45-54 75 42,269 240 000 50 50 " 48 Washington Street Miles Avenue to Highway 111 051 NIS 54 43-52 66 49,178 240 004 50 50 49 Washington Street Highway 111 to Eisenhower Drive 1 36 NIS 55 1 45-54 76 1 43,771 240 008 50 50 50 Washington Street Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 070 NIS 56 47-56 67 31,938 240 004 1 50 50 51 lWashinqton Street Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 0 50 NIS 51 42-51 69 29,735 1 240 012 50 50 Closest 85th 52 Washington Street Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 027 NIS 48 1 37-46 70 19,235 1 240 000 50 50 Closest 85th 53 Westward Ho Drive Dune Palms Road to Roadrunner Lane 022 ElW 38 29-38 69 3,102 305 0 91 25 35 54 Westward Ho Dnve Adams Street to Dune Palms Road 050 EIW 35 23-32 69 4,549 305 0 04 25 30 Engineering and Traffic Survey "See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments 10 City of La Qulnta SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more below the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver Each segment is discussed below Segment #1 — Adams Street — Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 11,151 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is commercial and residential The 85t" percentile speed is 52 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons Segment #2 — Adams Street — Miles Avenue to Highway 111 This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 16,109 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is commercial and residential The 85th percentile speed is 51 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons Segment #3 — Adams Street — Highway 111 to Avenue 48 This segment is currently posted at 45 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 9,836 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 52 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons Segment #5 — Avenida La Fonda — Washington Street to Desert Club Drive This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,313 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85tn percentile speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reasons Engineering and Traffic Survey 11 City of to Quinta Segment #6 — Avenida Bermudas -- Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 6,449 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential and commercial The 85th percentile speed is 33 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit However, due to various hidden driveways and intersections that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reasons Segment #7 — Avenida Bermudas — Avenue 52 to Calle Tecate This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 6,549 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 50 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons Segment #9 — Avenue 50 — Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street This segment is currently posted at 45 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 4,301 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85 h percentile speed is 51 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed However, due to a horizontal curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons Segment #10 -- Avenue 50 — Washington Street to Jefferson Street This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 9,339 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 55 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a vertical curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reasons Segment #12 — Avenue 52 — Washington Street to Jefferson Street This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 13,871 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 851h percentile speed is 57 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due a horizontal curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reasons Engineering and Traffic Survey 12 City of La Quinfa Segment #13 — Avenue 54 — Madison Street to Jefferson Street This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 12,857 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 58 mph and would normally justify a 60 mph posted speed limit However, due to the posted speed limits of the adjacent segments that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 55 mph for the above reasons Segment #19 -- Calle Sinaloa — Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas This segment is currently posted at 35 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 7,664 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit However, due to various hidden intersections that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reasons Segment #20 — Calle Tampico — Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street This segment is currently posted at 30 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 13,651 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is commercial The 85th percentile speed is 43 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit However, due to various hidden driveways and intersections that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reason Segment #21 -- Calle Tampico — Washington Street to Park Avenue This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,913 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit However, due to various hidden driveways and intersections that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason Segment #24 — Desert Club Drive — Avenue 52 to 1,300' Nf4 Calla Tampico This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,764 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is commercial within the vicinity of a school The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit However, due to moderate pedestrian traffic and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above reasons Engineering and Traffic Survey 13 City of La Quinta Segment #25 — Dune Palms Road — Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 6,393 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 49 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons Segment #26 — Dune Palms Road — Miles Avenue to Highway 111 This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 9,163 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential within the vicinity of a school The 85th percentile speed is 48 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve, moderate pedestrian traffic, and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons Segment #28 — Eisenhower Drive -- Washington Street to Calle Tampico This segment is currently posted at 40 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 10,739 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 49 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons Segment #29 — Eisenhower Drive — Calle Tampico to Avenida Bermudas This segment is currently posted at 35 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 9,936 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit However, due to various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reasons Segment #30 — Fred Waring Drive — Washington Street to Jefferson Street This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a painted median and has an ADT of 18,553 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 53 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reasons Engineering and Traffic Survey 14 City of La Quinta Segment #31 — Jefferson Street — North City Limit to Fred Waring Drive This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 3 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 21,100 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 58 mph and would normally justify a 60 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve, a vertical curve, moderate truck traffic, and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 55 mph for the above reasons Segment #32 — Jefferson Street — Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 3 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 21,519 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential and commercial The 85th percentile speed is 56 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due to moderate truck traffic and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reason Segment #34 — Jefferson Street — Highway 111 to Avenue 54 This segment is currently posted at 55 mph with 3 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 22,667 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is commercial and residential The 85th percentile speed is 58 mph and would normally justify a 60 mph posted speed limit However, due to various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 55 mph for the above reason Segment #36 — Madison Street —Avenue 54 to Avenue 58 This segment is currently posted at 45 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 9,099 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 56 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due to various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 50 mph for the above reason Segment #37 — Madison Street —Avenue 58 to Avenue 60 This segment is currently posted at 45 mph with 2 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 2,855 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 56 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 50 mph for the above reasons -- _" Engineering and Traffic Survey 15 City of La Quinta Segment #38 — Miles Avenue — Washington Street to Jefferson Street This segment is currently posted at 50 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 10,796 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential within the vicinity of a school The 85th percentile speed is 54 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve, moderate pedestrian traffic, and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reasons Segment #45 — Park Avenue — Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 3,103 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 46 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a horizontal curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reason Segment #47 — Washington Street — Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 3 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 42,269 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 55 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve and moderate truck traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent it is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reasons Segment #48 — Washington Street — Miles Avenue to Highway 111 This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 3 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 49,178 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is commercial The 85th percentile speed is 54 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve and moderate truck traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reasons Segment #49 — Washington Street — Highway 111 to Eisenhower Drive This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 3 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 43,771 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is commercial and residential The 85th percentile speed is 55 mph and would normallyjustify a 55 mph posted speed limit However, due to a horizontal curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reasons Engineering and Traffic Survey 16 Cfty of La Quinta Segment #50 — Washington Street — Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 This segment is currently posted at 50 mph with 3 through lanes in each direction divided by a raised median and has an ADT of 31,938 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 56 mph and would normally justify a 55 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a horizontal curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 50 mph for the above reasons Segment #53 — Westward Ho Drive -- Dune Palms Road to Roadrunner Lane This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 3,102 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason Segment #54 — Westward Ho Drive — Adams Street to Dune Palms Road This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 4,549 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential within the vicinity of a school and park The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve, moderate pedestrian traffic, and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reasons Engrneertng and Traffic Survey 17 City of La Qurnta LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 1 Section 627 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read Section 627 (a) "Engineering and traffic survey, "as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements (2) Accident records (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following (1) Residential density (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety Basic Speed Law 22350 No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property Speed Law Violations Section 22351 (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing Engineering and Traffic Survey 18 City of La Quinta Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 22352 (a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof. (1) Fifteen mph A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car B) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals C) On any alley (2) Twenty-five mph A) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code (B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds (C) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs (3) Thirty-five miles per hour on any highway, other than a state highway, in any moderate density residential district, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 22352 1, when posted with a sign giving notice of that speed limit, unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code (applies to Town of Apple Valley only) Engineering and Traffic Survey 19 City of La Quinta Increase of Local Limits Section 22357 (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour (mph) would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 mph, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 mph or a maximum speed limit of 65 mph, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the bans of an engineering and traffic survey This section does not apply to any 25 mph prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366 If over 55 mph Maximum Speed for Designated Vehicles Section 22406 (a) No person may drive any of the following vehicles on a highway at a speed in excess of 55 mph (1) A motortruck or truck tractor having three or more axles or any motortruck or truck tractor drawing any other vehicle (2) A passenger vehicle or bus drawing any other vehicle (3) A school bus transporting any school pupil (4) A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers (5) A vehicle transporting explosives (6) A trailer bus, as defined in Section 636 (b) Any person who operates a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in Section 15210, upon a highway at a speed exceeding a maximum speed limit established under this code by 15 mph or more, is guilty of a misdemeanor A violation of this subdivision shall be considered a "serious traffic violation," as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 15210, and shall be subject to the sanctions provided under Section 15306 or 15308, in addition to any other penalty provided by law Downward Speed Zoning Section 22358 5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions Engineering and Traffic Survey 20 City of La Qurnta Boundary Line Streets Section 22359 With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions Speedtrap Prohibition Section 40801 No peace officer or other person shall use a speedtrap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speedtrap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code Speedtrap Section 40802 (a) A "speedtrap" is either of the following (1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358 3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within 5 years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone (b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage and federal -aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the maps, a "local street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet (B) Not more than one-half mile of a uninterrupted length Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445 (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction Engineering and Traffic Survey 21 City of La Quinta (2) For purposes of this section "School Zone" means that area of road contiguous to a school building or the grounds thereof, and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school wither during school hours or during the noon recess period (c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable (A) When radar is used, the officer issuing the citation has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the officer issuing the notice to appear has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than 2 hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (C)(i) The prosecution proved that the officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the officer establish that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D) (u) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the condition present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406 (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the 3 years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility (2) A "speedtrap" is either of the following (A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance (13)(1) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358 3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects (1) Except as specified in subclause (II), 7 years (11) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than 7 years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the Engineering and Traffic Survey 22 City of La Quinta section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic condition have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone Speedtrap Evidence Section 40803, (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speedtrap (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within 5 years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802 Engineering and Traffic Survey 23 Crty of La Qulnta APPENDIX A Street Segment Data Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Qulnta CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Adams Street 1 DATE 2/27/07 `1 P �.9 1 between Fred Waring Drive and Mlles Avenue TIME 9 15 OBSERVER. Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 1 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no) 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial Commercial, (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Miles & Fred (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Waring 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with a painted median undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 63' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 7 STREET: Adams Street between Fred Wanng Dnve and Mies Avenue LOCATION: 1 Direction Bi-directional 0 Northbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Eastbound * ElWestbound iRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement La Palma / Adams Park Date of Radar Measurement 2/27/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13 17 TO 13 45 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 47 52 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 43-52 (79%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 45 mph 1 50 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 1 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided e CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) %a3 0 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number a J CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Adams Street between Miles Avenue DATE: 2f27/07 _ TIME 9 33 P 1 1 I and Highway 111 OBSERVER- Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 2 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation {%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Commercial, (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential residential 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Miles, Westward Ho, & (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Highway 111 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with a painted median undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 63' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowedon (yes or no) both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Adams Street 1 between Mlles Avenue and Highway 111 LOCATION, 2 .. Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Westbound ., PART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Bayberry Lane Date of Radar Measurement 2/27/2007 t a Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13 50 TO 14 16 M 50%de (mph)85%ile (mph) 46 =1 s 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 42-51 (77%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 45 mph 50 mph PA III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 1 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM) Actual 0 06 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristic I.RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La lQumta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of 1 California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Adams Street DATE 2/27/07 P between Highway 111 and Avenue 48 TIME: 11 02 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 3 pRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation {%) 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5, Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6, Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on East side only (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Avenue 48 & (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Highway 111 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 17' raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median 13 Street Width and Alignment 33' 33' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowedon (yes or no) both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Adams Street between Highway 111 and Avenue 48 LOCATION 3 EPART n Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Southbound * ❑ Eastbound [I Westbound * ., PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Via Grazianna Date of Radar Measurement 2/27/2007 -t Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14 30 TO 14 49 50%ile (mph) =85%ile (mph) 47 52 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 42-51 (69%) Posted Lima Prevailing Limit 45 mph 50 mph PA III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 3 Midblock Expected-Statewide[Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 49 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristic RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided ,CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete 1 am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Airport Boulevard between Madison Street DATE- 5/15/07 P and Monroe Street TIME 16 27 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION 4 ART I: HIGHWAY &ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B WIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Business (residential, commercial, office, etc) g Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Madison St (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 18' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lane on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 34' 34' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY — STREET. Airport Boulevard � C 1 between Madison Street and Monroe Street LOCATION 4 Direction &-directional p Northbound* p Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound IRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Greg Normans Course Date of Radar Measurement 5/17/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10 54 TO 12 43 50%de (mph) 85%de (mph) 47 54 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 42-51 (57%) Posted Limit I Prevailing Limit NP 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph �:] I " May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 1 CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) I la/�> 3 0 � TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number i I 1 PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph �:] I " May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 1 CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) I la/�> 3 0 � TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number i I 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Avenida La Fonda between Washington Street and Desert Club Drive DATE 2/27/07 1P TIME '15 38 OBSERVER. Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 5 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (n/u) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Recreational center (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets Stop at Washington (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) & Desert Club 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, undivided, undivided, painted, or raised median) no striping 13 Street Width and Alignment 36' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Avenida La Fonda P J between Washington Street and Desert Club Drive LOCATION: 5 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Eastbound " ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►ITT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Calle Iloilo Date of Radar Measurement 3/21/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 00 TO 15 57 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 29 35 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 25-34 (66%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 25 mph 35 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31 /2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) �-- 1'�-/3/b TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) �-- 1'�-/3/b TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenida Bermudas 1 DATE. 2/27/07 1 P between Calle Tampico and Avenue 52 TIME 14 43 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 6 ART l: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sit Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8, Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Commercial (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential 9, Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Calle Tampico (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) & Avenue 52, Stop at Montezuma 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 2 lanes, divided with 2 lanes, divided with a Bike lane on east 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, a double yellow stripe raised median from side only undivided, painted, or raised median) from Montezuma to Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 Montezuma 13 Street Width and Alignment 42 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes Parking allowed on (yes or no) West side south of Estado Only at traffic signal 17 Street Lighting locations and West side CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Avenida Bermudas between Calle Tampico and Avenue 52 LOCATION: 6 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Eastbound * ElWestbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 51383 Avenida Bermudas Date of Radar Measurement 3/20/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 11 29 TO 11 59 50%jle (mph) 85°bile (mph) 27 33 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 24-33 (73%) Posted Limit Prevailmg Limit 25 mph 35 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 3 35 per MVM Accident Rate AAcccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 mph * Mey be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 1 i CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quints was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of e California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). I �c� TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET- Avenida Bermudas between Avenue 52 1 DATE 2/27/07 TIME 1513 and Calle Tecate OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 7 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation {%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on West (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Yes Sidewalk on East side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Avenue 52, 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets Stop at Calle (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Nogales, Calle Colima & Calle Madrid 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with Bike lane on East undivided, painted, or raised median) a double yellow stripe side only 2 lanes south of Arroba 13 Street Width and Alignment 63' (width, feet -- straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes Parking allowed on {yes or no} West side only 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET, Avenida Bermudas between Avenue 52 and Calle Tecate LOCATION. 7 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 52125 Avenida Bermudas Date of Radar Measurement 3/20/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 11 04 TO 11 25 50%de (mph) 85%Ile (mph) 44 50 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 39-48 (62%) Posted Lima Prevailing Limit 40 mph 50 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 5 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 35 per MVM Accident Rate AcclMVM Actual 0 40 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph " May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION- I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as af�Professional Engineer (Traffic) /l . . . o -�. /a / A Vanessa M Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET- Avenida Montezuma between Avenida Carranza and Calle Potrero DATE 5/15/07 TIME- 17 02 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION. 8 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveway on West side only (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalk on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Vacant land Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) tight 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, undivided undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 32 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity Mh the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 7 STREET Avenida Montezuma between Avenida Carranza and Calle Potrero LOCATION 8 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound ❑ Eastbound " ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 52210 Avenida Montezuma Date of Radar Measurement 5/16/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 7 00 TO 9 00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 24 31 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 22-31 (65%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP 30 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/11/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 3 Midblock Expected -Statewi deNea r 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 1 73 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION, I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 j Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number I a CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Avenue 50 1 DATE. 2/28/07 1 p J between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street TIME 14 48 OBSERVER. Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 9 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight In Obstructions? EIB W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalk on South side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Eisenhower & (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Washington 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channeltzation (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 11' raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median 13 Street Width and Alignment 31 26 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 50 between i Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street LOCATION, 9 [D7irectton &-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound" ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound " PART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement W/O Duna La Quinta ,.� Date of F2adar Measurement 3/20/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13 00 TO 13 44 50%1le (mph) I 85%ile (mph) 45 1 51 j 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 40-49 (62%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 45 mph 50 mph P ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristic RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) a t1) 7 TE 2341 vanessa munoz Date State Registration Number f PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristic RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) a t1) 7 TE 2341 vanessa munoz Date State Registration Number f CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Avenue 50 between Washington. Street and Jefferson Street DATE 2128/07 TIME*13 19 OBSERVER. Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 10 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B WiB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) None Paved Paved ±2000'ofunpaved 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) section on South side 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides No No No sidewalks 7 pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without present for ±500' on sidewalks (yes or no) North and ±2000' on South 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offset TS @ Park, Jefferson, & (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Washington 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 1 WIB lane from 11' raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median Jefferson Street to ±500' West 13 Street Width and Alignment 31' 31' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 1 STREET Avenue 50 P 1Pfi between Washington Street and Jefferson Street LOCATION- 10 Direction ART &-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement '/mile E/O Park St Date of Radar Measurement 2/28/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14 50 TO 15 35 50%de (mph) 85%ile (mph) 50 55 10 mph Pace(% of Vehicles) 44-53(69%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Mfdblock 0 M+dbiock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate Ace/MVM) Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 1 CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Y 1 l / / ^f / ^y . f �aC /13 Vanessa Munoz / �J Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Avenue 52 7 DATE, 2127107 1 P I between Avenida Bermudas TIME 11 02 and Washington Street OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION• 11 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E1B W113 Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%} None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides No No No sidewalk on 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without North side from sidewalks (yes or no) Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Residential Commercial 8 Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Avenida (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Bermudas & Washington 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 17' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lanes on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 33' 33' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowedon (yes or no) both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY w STREET Avenue 52 between Avenida Bermudas and Washington Street LOCATION. 11 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound LRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement E/O Park Date of Radar Measurement 3/21/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 9 00 TO 9 45 50%Ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 44 49 P:m:p:h: Pace (% of Vehicles) 40-49 (71 %) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 45 mph 50 mph PART Ill: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 3 Midblock Expected-Statewfde[Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 28 per MVM PART 1V: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t' percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT -7 50 mph 7 * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided ti f CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) J� TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 52 DATE 2/28/07 .. P between Washington Street and Jefferson Street TIME 11 34 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION- 12 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics No driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) g Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS @ Cetnno & Washington (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 18' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lane on both sides 13 Street Wtidth and Alignment 33' 33' (width, feet -- straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16, Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowedon both sides (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 1 1 7 STREET. Avenue 52 between Washington Street and .Jefferson Street LOCATION- 12 Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated ill/2004 TO 12/3112006 Number of Midblock 1 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 04 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph k Mav be usPd in cases where two or more seoarate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta Was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) /3 6 Y TE 2341 ^� Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number I PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph k Mav be usPd in cases where two or more seoarate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta Was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) /3 6 Y TE 2341 ^� Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number I CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 52 between Washington Street and Jefferson Street LOCATION: 12 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound \RT 11: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Silver Rock Resort Golf Course DW Date of Radar Measurement 3/20/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 9:27 TO 9:47 50%ile (mph) 85%aile (mph) 50 57 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 48-57 (59%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 1 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-StatewideNear 2,10 per MVM Actual 0.04 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 7-50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more senarate rnnclwavc nrP nrnviriad CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of ilifornia as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz r a :3I Date TE 2341 State Registration Number STREET Avenue 54 DATE 2/28/07 F CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Madison Street and Jefferson Street TIME 10 39 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION- 13 ART " HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B WIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation {%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics No driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Vacant land (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets Stop at Madison & (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Jefferson 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 12' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lanes on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 31' 31' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes No (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowedon (yes or no) both sides 17 Street Lighting No No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 54 1C i between Madison Street and Jefferson Street LOCATION 13 Direction Bi-directional 0 Northbound* © Southbound ❑ Eastbound * © Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Midpoint between Madison & Jefferson Date of Radar Measurement 3/20/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10 01 TO 10 42 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 50 58 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 47�-56 (60%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 60 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph j I I 1 * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 1 I J CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) / ' � A 0 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph j I I 1 * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 1 I J CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) / ' � A 0 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Avenue 54 DATE 5/16/07 P between Madison Street and Monroe Street TIME 17 47 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION 14 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Unpaved/paved Unpaved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics No Driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalk on South side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with a painted stripe undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 42 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 54 between Madison Street and Monroe Street LOCATION- 14 Direction Bi-directional❑ Northbound* [ISouthbound ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Westbound PART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 113 mile East of Madison Date of Radar Measurement 5/15/2007 A Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 10 TO 15 40 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 46 53 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 42-51 (61%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph 1 PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/112004 TO 12131/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1 75 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85to percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 1 CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quints was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) lW 3 TE 2341 Za Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Avenue 58 DATE. 5/16/07 P between Jefferson Street and Madison Street TIME 17 34 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION- 15 ART I. HIGHWAY &ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? EIB W1B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%} None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Unpaved Paved/unpaved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 5 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalk on South side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No Stop at Madison (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with a painted median undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 44' (width, feet -- straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY .� STREET: Avenue 58 between Jefferson Street and Madison Street LOCATION 15 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound * ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Santa Rosa Date of Radar Measurement 5/17/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 7 35 TO 8 45 50%ile (mph) 85%fle (mph) 41 1 50 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 37-46 (53%) Posted Limit I Prevailing Limit NP 50 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected -StatewidelYear 1 75 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM 31ART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t�' percentile speec RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph " May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION' I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and Is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Mu TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET, Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street DATE 5/16/07 TIME 16 30 OBSERVER: Matthew Son LOCATION 16 ED ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%} None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveway on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalk on South side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Commercial (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No Offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided by a Bike lane on North undivided, painted, or raised median) painted median side only 13 Street Width and Alignment 72 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ON. STREET. Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street LOCATION: 16 Frection Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound * ❑ Westbound PART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 81-600 Avenue 58 Date of Radar Measurement 5/16/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 16 05 TO 17 08 50%iie (mph) 85%ile (mph) 46 55 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 39-48 (51 %) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP 55 mph a i PART III. ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected -StatewideNear 210 per MVM Accident Rate ACc1MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t' percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph J * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided i ,CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341- Vanessa Muno ate State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 1 STREET- Avenue 60 between Madison Street DATE 5/16/07 P and Monroe Street TIME 14 39 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION- 17 ART 1: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? EIB W!B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4, Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Unpaved 5, Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6, Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalk on South side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Vacant land (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 3 lanes, divided with 10' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lane on South side only 13 Street Width and Alignment 33' 15' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting No No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 0- STREET Avenue 60 1P.4 between Madison Street and Monroe Street LOCATION- 17 [Direction ART Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * 0 Eastbound ` ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 1000' East of Trilogy pate of Radar Measurement 5/16/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 12 TO 15 42 50%ale (mph) 85%Ile (mph) 50 57 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 43-52 (65%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP 55 mph RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 05 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t" percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph " May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 1 s CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La lQuinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) CA 0 77 TE 2Ad7 essa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ' ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Avenue 60 between Madison Street DATE 5/16/07 TIME 14 35 and West End OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION 18 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal 2 Vertical 3 Superelevation {%) 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Unpaved Unpaved Dirt roadway (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET- Avenue 60 between Madison Street and West End LOCATION 18 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Southbound p Eastbound " ❑ Westbound PART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Date of Radar Measurement Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 50%de (mph) 85%ile (mph) 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 3 P 4 1 ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 0 00 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS r RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT * Me be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided { G CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Profession I Engineer (Traffic) / TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 7 PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS r RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT * Me be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided { G CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Profession I Engineer (Traffic) / TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 7 CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Calle Sinaloa between Eisenhower Drive DATE 2/27/07 TIME 14 30 and Avenida Bermudas OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 19 4RT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%} None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No No sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No Offset TS at Avenida (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Bermudas, Stop at Eisenhower 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 17' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lanes on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment ' 33' 33' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Calle Sinaloa between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Bermudas LOCATION, 19 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound" * [ISouthbound ❑ Eastbound ❑ Westbound PART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Mendoza Date of Radar Measurement 3/20/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 17 27 TO 18 03 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 38 44 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 35-44 (64%) Posted Limit j Prevailing Limit 35 mph 1 45 mph C ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-StatewidelYear 3 35 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM CART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway charactenstici RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided k CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La i Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Vanessa Munoz TE 2341 State Registration Number " CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Calle Tampico between Eisenhower Drive DATE. 2128/07 P and Washington Street TIME 14 20 OBSERVER, Jeffrey Lau LOCATION- 20 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? EIB W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation {%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved a Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both Sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial, office Commercial, office (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Eisenhower, 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets Avenida Bermudas, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Desert Club & Washington 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 11' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lane on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 32 32' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET- Calle Tarrrplco between Eisenhower Drive w EP, and Washington Street LOCATION 20 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Eastbound " ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement La Quinta Library Date of Radar Measurement 3/1/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14 19 TO 14 53 50%ile (mph) 85%Ile (mph) 38 =43 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 34-43 (66%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 30 mph 45 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1I112004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 6 Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 3 35 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 54 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Vanessa Munoz !,� 3 d� Date TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Calle Tampico between Washington Street and Park Avenue DATE 2/28/07 TIME 14 36 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 21 P ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? EIB W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Washington (i5paang, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 2 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, a double yellow stripe sides from Calle undivided, painted, or raised median) Rondo to Park Street 13 Street Width and Alignment 40 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes No parking allowed (yes or no) from Calle Rondo to Park Street 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Calle Tampico between Washington Street _ and Paris Avenue LOCATION. 21 Direction &-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Eastbound * 0 Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Midpoint between Washington and Park Date of Radar Measurement 3/1/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 15 TO 15 44 50%de (mph) 85%de (mph) 37 42 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 34-43 (81%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 30 mph 40 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 mph J * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La I Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of „ California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) j /a/31o�1 vanessa munoz TE 2341 Registration Number i CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Calle Tecate between Avenida Bermudas and Avenida Madero DATE. 5/15/07 TIME 1714 P s OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION 22 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics Dustpan (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Vacant land (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No Offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted stripe 13 Street Width and Alignment 35 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the CommunityYes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY —, STREET: Calle Tecate P 4 J between Avenida Bermudas and Avenida Madero LOCATION- 22 rection Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Souhbound ❑ Westbound ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate ACc1MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85ch percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) rJ r i 1a i3 Vanessa Munoz TE 2341 State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85ch percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) rJ r i 1a i3 Vanessa Munoz TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY -1 STREET Caleo Bay Drive between Avenue 47 and Avenue 48 DATE. 2/27/07 TIME 11 18 OBSERVER. Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 23 PART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets Stops at Avenue 47 (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) & Avenue 48 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median 13 Street Width and Alignment 40 (width, feet -- straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Caleo Bay Drive between Avenue 47 and Avenue 48 LOCATION. 23 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound ` ❑ Eastbound " ❑ Southbound ❑Westbound r 1RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 47647 Caleo Bay Dr Date of Radar Measurement 3/1/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 7 56 TO 9 07 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 26 31 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 23-32 (81 %) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 25 mph 30 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/9/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t" percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided 'CERTIFICATION- I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quanta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Ij _ , /--- ' Vanessa Munoz Date ja/3/�9 TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Desert Club Drive DATE- 2/27107 P between _1,300' N/O Calle Tampico and Avenue 52 TIME. 15 47 OBSERVER. JeffreyLau LOCATION 24 ART l: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no) 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial, office Commercial, office NIO Calle Tampico, (residential, commercial, office, etc) school on east and residential on west 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Calle Tampico, Stop at Avenue 52 (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with a yellow skip stripe undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 40 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Yes Lighting on East side and traffic signal only CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Desert Club Drive between 1 ,300' N/O Calle Tampico and Avenue 52 LOCATION 24 Direction Bi-directional Northbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Westbound PART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Calle Estado Date of Radar Measurement 3/20/2007 -' Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 51 TO 16 45 ^l 50%jle (mph) 85%ife (mph) 30 35 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 23-32 (73%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 30 mph 35 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide{Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate AcclMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided a CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duty registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) fc �/ 3 d TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Dune Palms Road between Fred Waring Drive and Miles Avenue DATE 2/27107 TIME 10 36 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 25 RT l: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS I Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Honzontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics No driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Fred Waring & Miles (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 4anes, divided with a painted median undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 63' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations R CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Dune Palms Road between Fred Waring Drive and Miles Avenue LOCATION: 25 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound " ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Midpoint of Fred WaringDr and Miles Ave Date of Radar Measurement 2/27/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 35 TO 16 00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 44 49 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 38-47 (78%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 40 mph T50 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristic, -1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 1 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided k CERTIFICATION- I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) vanessa munoz Date TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Dune Palms Road and Highway 111 DATA 2/27/07 TIME 10 24 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION- 26 between Miles Avenue ART 1: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B NIB Notes es or no 1, Horizontal No 2, Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3, Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) - 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on East (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential, school, Residential, school (residential, commercial, office, etc) office 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Westward Ho, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Desert Crest, Miles & Highway 111 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 2 lanes from undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median Westward Ho to channel bridge 13 Street Width and Alignment 63 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides Yes Lighting only on East side from 17 Street Lighting Westward Ho to Miles and at traffic Slrinpl Iocations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Dune Palms Road between Miles Avenue and Highway 111 LOCATION- 26 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound I]Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound " ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement SE of Desert Stream Date of Radar Measurement 2/27/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 03 TO 15 27 50%ile (mph) 85%ife (mph) 41 48 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 38-47 (66%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 45 mph 50 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 1 Accidents Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 10 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph T �:E I * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) J Z 3 j 16 7 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number i PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph T �:E I * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) J Z 3 j 16 7 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number i CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET, Dune Palms Road DATE 2/27/07 P between Highway 111 and Avenue 48 TIME: 10 44 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 27 ART" HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%} No 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) Commercial Office 8 Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Highway 111 (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) & Avenue 48 Good Good 10 Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median sides 18 Street Width and Alignment 26 2$ (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No (yes or no) IT Street Ltighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Dune Palms Road J� between Highway I I I and Avenue 48 LOCATION- 27 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 600' North of Avenue 48 Date of Radar Measurement 5/17/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 6 55 TO 7 17 50%ile (mph) 85%de (mph) 39 45 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 34-43 (68%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 45 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate (AccIMVM)Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t" percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided a CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of ,,California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 vanessa munoz Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t" percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided a CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of ,,California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 vanessa munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Eisenhower Drive between Washington Street and Calle Tampico DATE. 2/27/07 �. P i TIME 13 26 OBSERVER- Jeffrey Lau LOCATION- 28 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? EIB W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4, Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5, Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6, Commercial Driveway Characteristics No driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalk on West side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Washington, 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets Coachella, Avenida (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Fernando, Avenue 50, Calle Tampico 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 4 lanes, divided with 6' raised median, 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, a raised median bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) sides from Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 13 Street Width and Alignment 27 30 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET- Eisenhower Drive between Washington Street and Calle Tampico LOCATION 28 Direction Bi-directional El Northbound* El Eastbound ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound AT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Before Coachella Dr Date of Radar Measurement 2/28/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13 29 TO 14 16 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 43 49 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 38-47 (63%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 40 mph 50 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 1 Accidents Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 3 35 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM Actual 0 05 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT --- T 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided J CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)_ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number J PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT --- T 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided J CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)_ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number J CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico DATE 2/27/07 P and Avenida Bermudas TIME. 14 01 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION. 29 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Supereievabon (°lo) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides I Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Calle Tampico, Stop at Avenida 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets Montezuma, Calle Sinaloa, CalleNogales, {spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no} Calle Colima, Avenida Bermudas 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 11' raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median 13 Street Width and Alignment 31' 31' (width, feet -- straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes Yes (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas LOCATION. 29 Direction Bi-directional D Northbound ❑ Eastbound " ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound " AT 11: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 52247 Eisenhower Dr Date of Radar Measurement 3/21/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 951 TO 11 04 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 38 45 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 33-42 (60%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 35 mph 45 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1 /1 /2004 TO 12/31 t2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 8 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 35 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 39 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT F— 40 mph __�_ 7 1 * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) a/� d TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET, Fred Waring Drive _ between Washington Street and Jefferson Street DATE -r 2/28/07 TIME 9 38 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION- 30 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%} None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways only on (at grade, dustpan, etc) North Side No No sidewalk on 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without North side from sidewalks (yes or no) Adams to Port Maria 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Washington,Adams, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Dune Palms, Jefferson 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 4 lanes, divided with 1 W/B lane from Old 3 E/B lanes from a painted median Harbor to Dune Palms Dune Palms to 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, Jefferson Bike lane undivided, painted, or raised median) South side from Dune Palms to Jefferson 13 Street Width and Alignment 95 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate (heavy, moderate, flight) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) Yes Parking allowed on 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover North side from (yes or no) Adams to Dune Palms 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY II� 4. STREET Fred Waring Drive between Washington Street and Jefferson Street LOCATION 30 P Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Eastbound k ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Bella Vista Date of Radar Measurement 10/25/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 11 45 TO 12 00 50%lie (mph) 85%iie (mph) 50 53 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 45-54 (75%) Posted Lima Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1 /112004 TO 12/31 /2006 Number of Midblock 1 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM) Actual 0 02 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION- I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION- I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: .Jefferson Street DATE 5/17/07 P between North City Limit and Fred Waring Drive TIME 13 51 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION 31 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N1B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Fred Waring (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate Moderate 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 44 42 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET- Jefferson Street �R �i 7 7 between North City Limit and Fred Waring Drive LOCATION 31 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound ` ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement South of Dunbar Dr Date of Radar Measurement 5/1512007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 9 00 TO 9 43 50%ile (mph) I 85%ile (mph) 53 58 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 49-58 (72%) Posted Limit I Prevailing Limit 50 mph 760 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected -StatewideNear 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate ACC/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). f cam- 6 7 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 3 PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). f cam- 6 7 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 3 I S-tREET: Jefferson Street DATE 2/27/07 CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between _Fred Waring Dave and Miles Avenue TIME 11 50 OBSERVER- Jeffrey Lail LOCATION 32 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides No No No sidewalk on 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without West side ±1000' sidewalks (yes or no) south of Fred Warm 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Commercial (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offset TS at Fred Waring (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) & Miles 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate Moderate 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 14' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lane on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 43' 43' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Jefferson Street between Fred Waring Drive and Mlles Avenue LOCATION• 32 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound © Southbound " ❑ Westbound LRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement NIO Independence Date of Radar Measurement 3/1/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10 03 TO 10 22 50%de (mph) 85%ile (mph) 40 56 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 45-54 (60%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Mtdblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 7 50 mph T T * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quanta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number r PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 7 50 mph T T * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quanta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number r w' CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY If STREET Jefferson Street 71 PATE 2/28/07 between Westward Ho Drive TIME 10 10 and Highway 111 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 33 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) No 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential, Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) commercial 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Westward Ho, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Vista Grande, Grande, Highway 111 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate Moderate 12 Channehzatron (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 15' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lane on bath sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 43' 43' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Na - No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Yes Yes CITY OF LA QUINTA ' ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY I: STREET. Jefferson Street between Westward Ho Drive and Highway 111 ,f LOCATION: 33 a.l IPP Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound- ❑ Eastbound " ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound IRT 11: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT s Location of Radar Measurement Midpoint of Vista Grandeand Westward Ho Date of Radar Measurement 5/15/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10 00 TO 10 40 50%tie (mph) 85%tle (mph) 49 54 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 46-55 (64%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 3 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 17 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 851" percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided t l CERTIFICATION- I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) % /3i SE2341 Vanessa Munoz '.1/ Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ' ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 11 STREET Jefferson Street DATE 2/28/07 between Highway 111 and Avenue 54 TIME 10 20 OBSERVER. Jeffrey Lau LOCATION: 34 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on East (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Commercial, (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential No offsets TS at Highway 111, 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets Avenue 48, Avenue (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 50 & Pomelo, Stop at 54th Avenue 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 14' raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median 13 Street Width and Alignment 42' 43' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting ONy at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 7 STREET: Jefferson Street between _Highway_dighway 111 and Avenue 54 LOCATION- 34 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Souti�bound 0Westbound kRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement SIO Avenue 49 Date of Radar Measurement 2/28/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 45 TO 15 59 50%iie (mph) 85%ile (mph) 52 58 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 47-56 (68%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 55 mph 60 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 4 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide[Year 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM) Actual 0 01 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) 3 A TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date IState Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) 3 A TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date IState Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY I STREET Jefferson Street between Avenue 58 FDATE: 2/28/07 TIME. 11 10 and Quarry Lane OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 35 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no) 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) Yes 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Unpaved Unpaved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics No driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Vacant land Vacant land (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets Stop at Quarry (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with a double yellow stripe undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 29 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community No Both sides open (yes or no) space 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed on both sides (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY F STREET: Jefferson Street between Avenue 58 and Quarry Lane .I LOCATION- 35 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound " IRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Midpoint of "S" curve Date of Radar Measurement 3/21/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13 00 TO 14 42 50%ile (mph) I 85%ile (mph) 32 39 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 26-35 (63%) Posted Limit I Prevailing Limit None 40 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 1 30 per MVM Accident Rate Ac MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV; ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85ih percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) z a a TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number e PART IV; ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85ih percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) z a a TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number e CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET' Madison Street between Avenue 54 { DATE, 2/28107 TIME. 10 51 and Avenue 58 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION. 36 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevatton (oho) None Paved Paved Unpaved section on 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) West side ±1000' N/O Avenue 58 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on West (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only No No Sidewalks only on 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without West side and from sidewalks (yes or no) Airport to Valhalla on East side 8 Adjacent Land Use FResidential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Airport, cn Avenue Stop at (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) & 581" Avenue 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 ChanneVization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 17' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike Pane on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 33' 33' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking flowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location CITY OF LA QUINTA ' ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY F STREET Madison Street 7! IPA between Avenue 54 and Avenue 58 LOCATION• 36 Direction Bi-directional Northbound* Eastbound * ❑ Southbound❑ ❑ Westbound I RT [I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement SJO Greg Norman Course Date of Radar Measurement 3/1/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13 00 TO 13 58 50%i!e (mph)85%ile (mph) 50 56 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 45-54(57%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 45 mph 55 mph RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph L I * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided s CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) /-a/3 16'� Vanessa munoz Date TE 2341 Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Madison Street between Avenue 58 I I DATE 5/16107 TIME- 1718 and Avenue 60 OBSERVER, Matthew Son LOCATION- 37 4RT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalk on East side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Vacant land (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No No (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 17' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lane on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 34' 34' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowedon (yes or no) both sides 17 Street Lighting No No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY NR STREET: Madison Street between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60 LOCATION: 37 Drrecfion ART Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound p Westbound 11: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Andalusia Date of Radar Measurement 6/17/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 8 48 TO 10 48 50%de (mph) 85%ile (mph) 49 56 10 mph Pace (°lo of Vehicles) 44-53 (52%) Pasted Limit ART 111: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock Accidents 0 Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete 1 am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz I-2 /3 //�) -31 Date TE 2341 State Registratton Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete 1 am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz I-2 /3 //�) -31 Date TE 2341 State Registratton Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ` ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Miles Avenue DATE 2/27/07 between Washin ton Street and Jefferson Street TIME- 11 36 OBSERVER- Jeffrey.Lau LOCATION. 38 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on South (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential School located on (residential, commercial, office, etc) South s[de tust East of Dune Palms 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Washington, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Adams,Dune & Jefferson 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with Bike lane on North undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median side from Dune Palms to Jefferson 13 Street Width and Alignment 85 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Charactersstics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY F STREET. Miles Avenue between Washington Street and Jefferson Street ! LOCATION- 38 IPJA Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound IRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement EIO Los Manos Dr Date of Radar Measurement 3/1/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10 36 TO 10 54 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 49 54 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 43-52 (69%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph RIII: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midbiock 0 Midblock Expected-StatewidetYear 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided A I J CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Vanessa Munoz Date TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Monroe Street between Avenue 52 PATE 5/15/07 TIME 16 46 and Avenue 54 OBSERVER: Matthew Son LOCATION: 39 4RT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevat+on (°<o) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved/unpaved Unpaved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics Dirt (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Ad)acent Land Use Residential Agriculture (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate 12 Channelizat+on {# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with a painted stripe undivided, painted, or raised median} 13 Street Width and Alignment 24 (width, feet -- straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY FSTREET. Monroe Street M J PA between Avenue 52 and Avenue 54 LOCATION- 39 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound LRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement South of La Serena St Date of Radar Measurement 5/1512007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14 05 TO 14 21 50%de (mph) 85%ile (mph) 49 56 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 44-53 (61%) Posted Limit =Prevailing Limit NP 55 mph III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1 75 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 00 per MVM "j PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS J Closest to 85t'' percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided i CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La puinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Vanessa Munoz Date 101 /3 /a1 TE 2341 State Registration Number F STREET. Monroe Street DATE. 5/15107 CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard TIME- 16 36 OBSERVER Matthew Son LocATm 40 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical ND 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Unpaved Paved/unpaved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalk on South side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offset TS at Airport Blvd (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Heavy 12 Channelizatron (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with a painted stripe undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 28 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy Orr -Street Parking Turnover No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Monroe Street -j IPP 7 between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard LOCATION. 40 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound " ❑ Eastbound " ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound kRT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 54711 Monroe St Date of Radar Measurement 5/15/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14 25 TO 14 50 50%Ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 49 56 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 46-55 (55%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP 55 mph RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide[Year 1 75 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV. ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 851" percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete 1 am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) /a/3 ' 9 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY F STREET Monroe Street DATE: 5/15/07 between Airport Boulevard and Avenue 58 TIME 16 15 OBSERVER. Matthew Son LOCATION: 41 ART 1: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevatron (%} None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Unpaved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics None No driveways on (at grade, dustpan, etc) both sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalk on West sidewalks (yes or no) side only 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Commercial (residential,,commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Airport Blvd (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Good 10 Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate 12 Channelrzation (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with Bike lane on West undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median side only 13 Street Width and Alignment 43' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ,.� STREET Monroe Street between Airport Boulevard and Avenue 58 { LOCATION: 41 r � 7� 7 Direction &-directional ❑ Northbound * ID Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT il: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Tymar Lane Date of Radar Measurement 5/15/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15 45 TO 16 13 50%ile (mph) 85%0! (mph) 47 53 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 41-50 (58%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents I Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 10 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 00 per MVM 'j PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS ' Closest #0 85i'' percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional! Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 'j PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS ' Closest #0 85i'' percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional! Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Monroe Street between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60 DATE 5116107 TIME 11 35 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION. 42 CART 1: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS ht Distance Obstructions? �H�orizontal SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Unpaved Unpaved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Commercial (residentia4, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Poor (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with a painted stripe undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 27 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY .- STREET: Monroe Street j P between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60 LOCATION. 42 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound 1RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 59-002 Monroe St Date of Radar Measurement 5/16/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 11 30 TO 13 28 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 47 55 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 42-51 (49%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1 75 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 851'h percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 851'h percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY I, STREE3: Monroe Street between Avenue 60 F. DATE- 5/16/07 and Avenue 62 TIME 13 30 OBSERVER- Matthew Son LOCATION 43 ART is HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation {%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved/unpaved Unpaved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Commercial (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Heavy 12 Channel¢(# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided withatEon a panted stripe undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 27 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting No CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Monroe Street between Avenue 60 and Avenue 62 LOCATION 43 1 IPP Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound 1RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 500' South of Split Rock Date of Radar Measurement 5/16/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13 31 TO 14 22 50%de (mph) 85%de (mph) 48 60 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 43-52 (52%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP 60 mph RIII: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected -Statew,deNear 1 75 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM) Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed --T RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 60 mph " May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). /a ✓ TE 2341 L V nessa Munoz Date State Registration Number ) CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Palm Royale Drive between Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive _ DATE 5/17/07 TIME 14 32 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION- 44 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation {%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial, school Residential, (residential, commercial, office, etc) commercial 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Washington (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) St 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (## of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 26 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Yes CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Palm Royale Drive between Washington Street and Fred Waring Dnve LOCATION. 44 I" ,j IPA Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound p Westbound " 1RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Darby Road Date of Radar Measurement 5/17/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14 08 TO 14 31 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 23 28 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 20-29 (76%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP 30 mph RIII: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1 M 12004 TO 12131 /2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM ' May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided S CERTIFICATION, 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Vanessa Munoz / Date TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Park Avenue rVATE 2/28/07 and Calle Tampico TIME 13 09 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION. 45 between Avenue 50 4RT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics No driveways on (at grade, dustpan, etc) both sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Avenue 50 (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channehzation (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) a double yellow stripe sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 40 (width, feet -- straight or curved) 14 Traffic Plow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location I 4J CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Park Avenue between Avenue 50 and Calle Tampico LOCATION. 45 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound ❑ Sorthbound ❑ Westbound MT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement SIO Big Horn Date of Radar Measurement 3/20/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14 55 TO 15 40 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 41 46 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 35-44 (66%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 30 mph 45 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents i j Midblock 1 Expected-Statewide[Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided a CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Vanessa Munoz 1.21.3 Date TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY r— STREET: Sagebrush Avenue I _ DATE 5/15/07 between Washington Street and Date Palm Drive TIME- 17 28 OBSERVER Matthew Son LOCATION 46 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? EIB W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalk on North side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Washington (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) St 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, undivided undivided, painted, or raised median) 13 Street Width and Alignment 36' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes (yes or no) 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY i, STREET: Sagebrush Avenue between Washington Street and Date Palm Drive LOCATION 46 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound 1RT 11: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Via Bolero Date of Radar Measurement 5/17/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 Koury 15 00 TO 16 08 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 28 34 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 26-35 (58%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit NP T35 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t' percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 mph 3 May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) / rZ3 A TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t' percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 mph 3 May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) / rZ3 A TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 7 STREET Washington Street between Fred Waring Drive _ and Miles Avenue I 1 DATE: 2/28/07 TIME 9 09 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION: 47 CART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on East (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Vacant land Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Fred Waring (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) & Miles 10 Pavement Condition Satisfactory Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate Moderate 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 12' raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median 13 Street Width and Alignment 47' 40' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community No Yes Open space on SIB (yes or no) side 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowedon (yes or no) both sides 17 Street Lighting Yes No Lighting at traffic si nal locations also CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Washington Street between Fred Waring Drive and Miles Avenue LOCATION. 47 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Eastbound * ElSouthbound ❑ Westbound ART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement S/O Via Sevilla Date of Radar Measurement 2/28/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 8 30 TO 8 58 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 51 55 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 45-54 (75%) Posted Lima Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents MEdblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION- I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) 1 1-2.3 0 7 TE 2341 J Va essa Munoz/Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION- I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) 1 1-2.3 0 7 TE 2341 J Va essa Munoz/Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Washington Street between Miles Avenue and Highway 111 DATE 2/28107 TIME 8 58 OBSERVER. Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 48 p ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on East (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial Commercial (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Highway 111, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Channel Drive, Miles Avenue 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate Moderate 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 15' raised mediana undivided, painted, or raised median) raised median 13 Street Width and Alignment 39' 39' (width, fleet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Washington Street _ between Miles Avenue and Highway 111 FLOCATION 48 IPP Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Southbound . ❑ Eastbound " [I Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Midpoint of Channel Drand Miles Ave Date of Radar Measurement 5/15/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 11 17 TO 11 30 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 48 54 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 43-52 (66%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph RIII: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midblock 1 Midblock , Expected-StatewideNear 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate AccIMVM Actual 0 04 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 7 50 mph May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided a CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La j Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) t %off 13 f 6) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Washinqton Street between Hlghwav 111 and Eisenhower Drive DATE: 2/28/07 TIME. 15 04 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 49 4RT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevatson (°t°) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides No No No sidewalk on 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without West side from sidewalks (yes or no) Avenue 47 to Avenue 48 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential, church, Commercial, office (residential, commercial, office, etc) vacant land No offsets TS at Eisenhower, 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets Avenue 48, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Highway 111 & Avenue 47 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 16' raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median 13 Street Width and Alignment 38' 38' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Washington Street between Highway 111 and Eisenhower Drive LOCATION 49 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ❑ Eastbound ElSouthbound ❑ Westbound ART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Lake La Quinta Date of Radar Measurement 2/28/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 9 59 TO 10 51 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 50 55 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 45-54 (76%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 111/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 5 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 08 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided J CERTIFICATION i, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Vanessa Munoz Date /,-)- / 3 /6 -j, TE 2341 State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided J CERTIFICATION i, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) Vanessa Munoz Date /,-)- / 3 /6 -j, TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Washington Street between Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 DATE. 2/28107 TIME 13 36 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION- 50 ART l: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevatron (°/fl) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics No driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalk on East side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Avenue 50, Sagebrush &Eisenhower (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channefization {# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 13' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median} a raised median bike lane on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 40' 40' (width, feet -- straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Washington Street between Eisenhower Drive IP P J 1 and Avenue 50 LOCATION- 50 Direction ART Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement NE of Avenue 50 Date of Radar Measurement 2/2812007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10 36 TO 10 56 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 50 56 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 47-56 (67%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 55 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 1 Accidents Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate Ace/MVM Actual 0 04 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quints was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) n Vanessa Munoz A-Z/3 /6 F Date TE 2341 State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quints was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) n Vanessa Munoz A-Z/3 /6 F Date TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Washington Street between Avenue 50 and Calle Tampico DATE. 5115/07 TIME 17 35 OBSERVER- Matthew Son LOCATION: 51 PART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevatson {°!o} 3% 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profsle Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential, Residential, (residential, commercial, office, etc) commercial commercial 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Avenue 50 , (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Calle Tampico 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate Moderate 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided by a T raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) raised median bike lane on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 38' 38' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY M- STREET- Washington Street between Avenue 50 and Calle Tampico LOCATION. 51 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound* ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Midpoint of Ave 50 and Village Shop Ctr Date of Radar Measurement 5/15/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13 22 TO 13 39 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 47 51 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 42-51 (69%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/112004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 2 Accidents Midbiock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 12 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t" percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 54 mph May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of 4 California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ! %J23 le:: � TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85t" percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 54 mph May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION. I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of 4 California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ! %J23 le:: � TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY r- STREET Washington Street between Calle Tampico and Avenue 52 I 'a DATE .� P 2/28/07 TIME 11 48 OBSERVER- Jeffrey Lau LOCATION. 52 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? SIB NIB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2 Vertical No 3 Superelevation (%} None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on West (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on West side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8 Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Calle Tampico (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) & Avenue 52 10 Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 17' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lane on both sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 38 38' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET. Washington Street between Calle Tampico and Avenue 52 LOCATION. 52 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound " ❑ Eastbound " ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement Avenida La Fonda Date of Radar Measurement 2/28/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 11 02 TO 11 28 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 41 48 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 37-46 (70%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2 40 per MVM Accident Rate Ace/ VM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided J CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I air► duly registered in the State of ` California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) /a13 /0 y Vanessa Munoz Date TE 2341 State Registration Number i PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided J CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I air► duly registered in the State of ` California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) /a13 /0 y Vanessa Munoz Date TE 2341 State Registration Number i CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Westward Ho Drive between Dune Palms Road and Roadrunner Lane 71 DATE 2/27/07 TIME 10 06 OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION. 53 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B WEB Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation M None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on South (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the the Roadway without Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Dune Palms, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Stop at Roadrunner 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) tight 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with Bike lane on North undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median side 13 Street Width and Alignment 52 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location P— CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET Westward Ho Drive between Dune Palms Road and Roadrunner Lane I L, LOCATION• 53 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * p Eastbound * ❑ Southbound " ❑ Westbound ART II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 79625 Westward Ho Dr Date of Radar Measurement 3/1/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 7 29 TO 7 44 50%ile (mph) 85%Ile (mph) 32 38 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 29-38 (69%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 25 mph T 40 mph ART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Midblock 1 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) Actual 0 91 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 36 mph x May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) l o� 13 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 36 mph x May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) l o� 13 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY 7, STREET: Westward Ho Drive between Adams Street , DATE 2/27/07 TIME- 9 52 i and Dune Palms Road OBSERVER Jeffrey Lau LOCATION 54 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1 Horizontal No 2 Vertical Yes Crest Vert Curve 3 Superelevation (%) None 4 Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5 Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6 Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7 Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sidewalks (yes or no) sides 8 Adjacent Land Use School Park, residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9 Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Adams & (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Dune Palms 10 Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11 Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12 Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median sides 13 Street Width and Alignment 47 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14 Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15 Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16 Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes Parking allowed on (yes or no) North side only along the park 17 Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY F STREET: Westward Ho Drive between Adams Street and Dune Palms Road LOCATION 54 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound " [IEastbound ElSouthbound " ❑ Westbound MT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement East end of Westward Ho Park Date of Radar Measurement 3/1/2007 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 7 07 TO 7 22 50%ile (mph) 85%iie (mph) 29 35 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicies) 23-32 (69%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 25 mph 35 mph ►RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2004 TO 12/31/2006 Number of Accidents Midbiock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 3 05 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0 00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 mph —F A * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided j 1 CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). t �02 lo ; y TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 4 r I Radar Speed Distribution Forms ■�II���I�I�IIII�PII�IIIII�111� ��I�I ��III Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta APPENDIX B Survey Equipment Engineenng and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for this survey was a Genesis VersaPak Hand -Held traffic Radar manufactured by Decatur Electronics, of Decatur, Illinois, The calibration of the unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken Tests of the unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications The Genesis VersaPak Hand Held Traffic Radar was last calibrated on October 5, 2006 by R H F, Inc Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta APPENDIX C Speed Limit Map Engrneenng and Traffic Survey Crty of La Quinta