The URL can be used to link to this page

2014 Engineering & Traffic Survey (17 street segments)ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY November 2014 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY PM ,A/WILLDAN Engneee FOR THE CITY OF J:;' a P.l'!. 11A: Li 9k? LA QUINTA Prepared by: WlLLDAN Engineering NA/WI LLDANIyeour ng Engineering I reach November 19, 2014 Mr. Edward Wimmer, PE Principal Engineer City of La Quinta Public Works Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Subject: 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Mr. Wimmer: As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 17 street segments in the City of La Quinta. These segments were last surveyed in 2007 and 2009, and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City's arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices. The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( California MUTCD) dated January 2012, and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of La Quinta and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study. Very truly yours, W ILLDAN LAwru,� No. 67583 m ' �o.2241 w Exp. <v 30 - Vanessa M noz, P.E., T.E. * k Ev. G -30 Traffic En Weer sr s qrF of �c A``�°�� Enclosure Engineering I Geotechnical I Environmental I Susta nability I Financial I Homeland Security 562.908.6200 800.499.4484 1 fax: 562.695.2120 1 13191 Crossroads Parkway North. Suite 405. industry, CA 91746-3443 1 www.wiildan.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 1-2 Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey ........................................ 2-3 SURVEY CONDITIONS............................................................................... 4 SurveyLocations........................................................................................ 4 DataCollection........................................................................................... 4 SpeedData............................................................................................ 4 CollisionData......................................................................................... 5 FieldReview Data.................................................................................. 5 ANALYSIS................................................................................................... 6 Criteria........................................................................................................ 6 Results and Recommendations................................................................. 6-7 Table 1-Street Segments With Recommended Speed Changes ............... 7 Table 2-Summary of Recommendations.................................................... 8 Segments with Special Conditions............................................................. 9 LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES.................................................................... 10 Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code ......................................... 10-15 APPENDIX A - Segment Data Street Segment Sheets Radar Speed Distribution Forms APPENDIX B - Survey Equipment Used APPENDIX C — Speed Limit Map 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of La Quinta. This Engineering and Traffic Survey presents recommended speed limits for 17 street segments in the City of La Quinta. Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. These surveys must be updated every 5 or 7 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012. The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Sheriff's Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(1)]. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 10 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(11)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current. The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Code further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey: 1. Measurement of prevailing speed; 2. Accident history; and 3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist. Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers. Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion. Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement. ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as follows: Speed Sampling Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85t" percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed, except as shown in the two options below. Options: 1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85t"-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. 2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85t"-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85t" percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b). 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 2 City of La Quinta If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5 The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria: A. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85t" percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS. B. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85t" percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS. C. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85t" percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied. Collision History Reported collisions were obtained from the State of California's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic collision database and reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions. The average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans. A segment that has an above -average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists. A summary of the collision rates for the 17 surveyed street segments is provided in Appendix B. Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. It is important to note that The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 3 City of La Quinta SURVEY CONDITIONS SURVEY LOCATIONS The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of La Quinta. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following: 1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence. 2. Minimum visibility restrictions. 3. Non -congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways. 4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle. DATA COLLECTION Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 17 locations during the months of September and October 2014. Speed Data Radar speed measurements were conducted at 17 locations during September and October 2014. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 4 City of La Quinta Collision Data Collision data was obtained from the State of California's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic collision database. For this study, collision data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012. The collision rates for the 17 segments are expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate: M Ax1,000,000 U365 days x/xv year A = Number of midblock collisions over time period R = Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles) t = Time Period Covered (in years) / = Length of Segment (miles) v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic) The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans. Field Review Data A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors: 1. Street width and alignment (design speed); 2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics; 3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns; 4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on -street parking; 5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices; 6. Visibility obstructions; 7. Land use and proximity to schools; 8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage; 9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and 10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 5 City of La Quinta ANALYSIS CRITERIA Survey data was complied and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012. Some of the criteria used are: A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The "basic speed limit" is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85t" percentile speed. B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed. C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of La Quinta. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless an collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report. The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions. The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 6 City of La Quinta speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions. Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limits and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments. TABLE 1 STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES No STREET FROM TO EXISTING NEW CHANGE 8 Blackhawk Way Adams Street Dune Palms Road 30 35 Increase 9 Calle Tampico Eisenhower Drive Washington Street 40 45 Increase 13 Highway 111 West City Limit Adams Street 50 45 Decrease 14 Highway 111 Adams Street East City Limit 50 45 Decrease 15 Monroe Street Avenue 60 Avenue 62 60 50 Decrease 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 7 City of La Quinta TABLE 2: SPEED/ACCIDENT DATA SUMMARY TABLE D Street SegmentoADT (Mi.) Speed Pace Accident Exp. Rate Act, Posted Speed Prop. Speed Remarks CA MUTCD 1 Adams Street Miles Avenue to Highway 111 0.9 N/S 48 41-50 78% 12,044 1.55 0.42 45 45 OPTION 2 CA MUTCD 2 Avenida Bermudas Avenue 52 to Calle Arroba 1.0 N/S 44 34-43 73% 9,581 2.00 0.10 40 40 OPTION 2 Jefferson Street to West Boundary of CA MUTCD 3 lAvenue 50 Eastbound Mountain View Tract 0.3 E 48 41-50 74% 8,146 1.55 0.00 45 45 OPTION 2 West Boundary of Mountain View Tract to 85TH 4 Avenue 50 Eastbound East Boundary of Mountain View Tract 0.43 E 52 44-53 73% 8,536 1.55 0.50 50 50 PERCENTILE East Boundary of Mountain View Tract to 85TH 5 Avenue 50 Eastbound Madison Street 0.25 E 51 43-52 72% 10,805 1.55 0.00 50 50 PERCENTILE 85TH 6 Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas to Washington Street 0.52 E/W 52 43-52 63% 14,736 1.55 0.00 50 50 PERCENTILE CA MUTCD 7 Avenue 52 Washington Street to Jefferson Street 1.54 E/W 54 46-55 68% 10,003 1.55 0.30 50 50 OPTION 2 CA MUTCD 8 Blackhawk Way Adams Street to Dune Palms Road 0.5 E/W 38 27-36 68% 3,684 2.55 1.49 30 35/25** OPTION 2 CA MUTCD 9 Calle Tampico Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street 0.74 E/W 48 41-50 64% 7,193 2.55 0.17 40 45 OPTION 2 10 Calle Tampico Washington Street to Park Avenue 0.5 E/W 42 34-43 65/o " 3,563 2.55 0.00 35 35 85TH 11 Eisenhower Drive Calle Tampico to Avenida Bermudas 1.86 N/S 41 34-43 80% 8,109 2.55 0.00 40 40 PERCENTILE 85TH 12 Fred Waring Drive Washington Street to Jefferson Street 2.0 E/W 49 39-48 64% 19,316 1.30 0.14 50 50 PERCENTILE 13 Highway 111 West City Limit to Adams Street 1.0 E/W 42 35-44 o 54/o 26,294 1.30 0.35 50 45 14 Highway 111 Adams Street to East City Limit 1.0 E/W 42 31-40 56% 28,994 1.30 0.57 50 45 85TH 15 Monroe Street Avenue 60 to Avenue 62 1.0 N/S 52 42-51 60% 1,067 1.35 0.00 60 50 PERCENTILE 85TH 16 Washington Street Fred Waring to Highway 111 1.11 N/S 48 39-48 63% 30,396 1.30 0.03 50 50 PERCENTILE 85TH 17 Washington Street Highway 111 to Eisenhower Drive 1.33 1 N/S 48 1 39-48 1 74% 30,323 1.30 0.25 50 50 PERCENTILE * See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey ** = 25mph when children are present. 8 City of La Quinta SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Each segment is discussed below. Segment #9 — Calle Tampico — Washington Street to Park Avenue This segment currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 3,563 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #13 — Highway 111 — West City Limits to Adams Street This segment currently posted at 50 mph and has 3 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 26,294 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial. The critical speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, in order to maintain uniformity among adjacent street segments in neighboring municipalities, a higher speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons. Segment #14 — Highway 111 — Adams Street to East City Limits This segment currently posted at 50 mph and has 3 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 28,994 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial. The critical speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, in order to maintain uniformity among adjacent street segments in neighboring municipalities, a higher speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 9 City of La Quinta LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code: Section 627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey, "as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following: (1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district: a. Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures. b. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. C. The portion of highway is longer than one -quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Basic Speed Law 22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. Speed Law Violations Section 22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 10 City of La Quinta establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing. Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof: (a) Fifteen miles per hour: (1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley. (b) Twenty-five miles per hour: (1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Pedestrian Safety Account pursuant to Section 894.7 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 11 City of La Quinta Posting Local Speed Limits up to a Maximum of 65 Miles Per Hour Section 22357. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25 mile per hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. Downward Speed Zoning Section 22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. Boundary Line Streets Section 22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions. Speed Trap Prohibition Section 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speedtrap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 12 City of La Quinta Speed Trap Section 40802. (a) A "speed trap" is either of the following: (1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as "local" on the "California Road System Maps," that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the "California Road System Maps," it may be defined as a "local street or road" if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions: (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. (B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. (2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable: (A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 13 City of La Quinta (C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406. (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A "speed trap" is either of the following: (A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects: (1) Except as specified in subclause (11), seven years. (11) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. Speed Trap Evidence Section 40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speedtrap. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 14 City of La Quinta (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802. (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey 15 City of La Quinta F'ALI V M I IA At a a =1 L I PAFJ Street Segment Data 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta STREET: Adams Street CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Miles Avenue DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 9:45 OBSERVER: J. Lau and Highway 111 LOCATION: 1 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical Yes Crest Vert. Curve 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Commercial, (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential residential 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Miles, Blackhawk, &Highway (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 111 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 4 lanes, divided with Raised median from 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, a painted median Blackhawk to HWY undivided, painted, or raised median) 111 13. Street Width and Alignment 63' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed on both sides (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations STREET: Adams Street C CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Miles Avenue and Highway 111 LOCATION: 1 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78950 Highway 111 Date of Radar Measurement 9/22/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10:30 TO 11:30 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 43 48 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 41-50 (78%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 45 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 5 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1.55 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.42 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). noz TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenida Bermudas between DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 14:20 P Avenue 52 OBSERVER: J. Lau and Calle Arroba LOCATION: 2 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on West side only (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Yes No Sidewalk on East side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (Non -Fronting) (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Avenue 52; 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets Stop at Calle (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Nogales, Calle Colima 10. Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with Bike lane on east undivided, painted, or raised median) a double yellow stripe side. Parking lane on west side. 13. Street Width and Alignment 64' - Straight (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes Parking allowed on West side only (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenida Bermudas between Avenue 52 and Calle Arroba LOCATION: 2 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 53185 Avenida Bermudas Date of Radar Measurement 10/24/14 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10:58 TO 11:32 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 38 1 44 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 34-43 (73%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 40 mph 45 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 1 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 2.00 per MVM Actual 0.10 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 4ECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). II 011 vanessa mbnoz TE 2341 5tate Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 50 (EB) between DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 13:15 L' ' Jefferson Street OBSERVER: J. Lau West Boundary of and Mountain View Tract LOCATION: 3 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? W/B E/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical Yes Crest Vertical Curve 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved/unpaved Unpaved after Retail Stores 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics Dustpan Driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No sidewalk after retail stores sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential Retail on W/B by (residential, commercial, office, etc) Jefferson St 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offset TS @ Jefferson St (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory Good on W/B side (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 2 lanes divided with 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, painted two way left undivided, painted, or raised median) turn lane and double yellow 13. Street Width and Alignment 28' Street is wide by Jefferson St (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking allowed (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal location CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY West Boundary of STREET: Avenue 50 (EB) between Jefferson Street and Mountain View Tract LOCATION: 3 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ® Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 80159 Avenue 50 Date of Radar Measurement 9/23/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 9:00 TO 10:00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 44 1 48 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 41-50 (74%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 45 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1.55 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. 1 am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). unoz TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 50 (EB) between DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 13:30 P) West Boundary of Mountain View Tract and OBSERVER: J. Lau East Boundary of Mountain View Tract LOCATION: 4 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? W/B E/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade, dustpan Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides No No sidewalks on 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without both sides. Horse sidewalks (yes or no) trail on south side. 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offset (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Satisfactory 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 1 lane with raised 2 lanes divided with 6' raised median 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, median raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) 31' 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) No No parking 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover restrictions posted (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting None CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY West Boundary of STREET: Avenue 50 (EB) between Mountain View Tract and East Boundary of Mountain View Tract LOCATION: 4 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ® Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 79330 Briarwood Date of Radar Measurement 9/22/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14:30 TO 15:30 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 47 1 52 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 44-53 (73%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 2 Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 1.55 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.50 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY East Boundary of STREET: Avenue 50 (EB) between Mountain View Tract DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 13:45 OBSERVER: J. Lau C and Madison Street LOCATION: 5 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? W/B E/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Unpaved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics Dustpan Driveway on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offset Stop @ Madison St (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 1 lane divided with Painted median is undivided, painted, or raised median) painted median two-way left turn 13. Street Width and Alignment Total = 34' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking restrictions posted (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting None CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY East Boundary of STREET: Avenue 50 (EB) between Mountain View Tract and Madison Street I LOCATION: 5 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound * ® Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 50075 Doral Street Date of Radar Measurement 9/22/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13:30 TO 14:30 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 46 1 51 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 43-52 (72%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 1.55 per MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa M TE 2341 State Registration Number STREET: Avenue 52 CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Avenida Bermudas DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 11:45 OBSERVER: J. i_au C and Washington Street LOCATION: 6 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides No No No sidewalk on 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without North side from sidewalks (yes or no) Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential Commercial (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Avenida Bermudas, Desert (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Club, Washington 10. Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 17' raised median, undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median bike lanes on both sides 13. Street Width and Alignment 33' 33' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 17. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 52 between Avenida Bermudas C and Washington Street LOCATION: 6 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78164 Avenue 52 Date of Radar Measurement 9/23/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14:00 TO 14:30 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 46 52 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 43-52 (63%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 1.55 per MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph 7 1 * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz I --._J Date " IState Registration Num STREET: Avenue 52 CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Washington Street and DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 12:00 OBSERVER: J. Lau P) Jefferson Street LOCATION: 7 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics No driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS @ Cetrino & 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets Washington. (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Roundabout at Jefferson. 10. Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with a raised median 18' raised median, bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) sides 13. Street Width and Alignment 33' 33' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed on both sides (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations STREET: Avenue 52 PIA CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Washington Street and Jefferson Street LOCATION: 7 Direction ART Bi-directional Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78860 Citrus Date of Radar Measurement 9/23/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 14:30 TO 15:00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 49 54 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 46-55 (68%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 1 55 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 5 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1.55 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.30 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Blackhawk Way between DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 9:15 C Adams Street OBSERVER: J. Lau and Dune Palms Road LOCATION: 8 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical Yes Crest Vert. Curve 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Driveways on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) No Sidewalks on both 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without sides. Uncontrolled sidewalks (yes or no) Mid -block x-walk in front of School 8. Adjacent Land Use School Park, residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Adams & Dune Palms (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 2 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) a painted median sides 13. Street Width and Alignment 47 (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed on both sides (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Blackhawk Way between LN Adams Street and Dune Palms Road LOCATION: 8 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement East End of La Quinta Park Date of Radar Measurement 10/24/14 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 9:00 TO 10:41 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 33 38 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 27-36 (68%) Posted Limit I Prevailing Limit 30 mph 1 40 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 3 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 2.55 per MVM Actual 1.49 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Calle Tampico between DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 11:15 P Eisenhower Drive OBSERVER: J. Lau and Washington Street LOCATION: 9 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) Commercial, office Commercial, office 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Eisenhower, 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets Avenida Bermudas, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Desert Club & Washington 10. Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with raised median 11' raised median,a bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) sides 13. Street Width and Alignment 32' 32' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed on both sides (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Calle Tampico between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street i LOCATION: 9 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78200 Calle Tampico Date of Radar Measurement 9/23/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 11:00 TO 12:00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 43 48 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 41-50 (64%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 40 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 1 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2.55 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.17 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Mu Date TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Calle Tampico between Washington Street and Park Avenue DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 11:30 OBSERVER: J. Lau LOCATION: 10 C kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Washington (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 2 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, a double yellow stripe sides except no bike undivided, painted, or raised median) lanes from Calle Quito to Calle Rondo. 13. Street Width and Alignment 40' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes Yes Parking allowed from Calle Quito to (yes or no) Calle Rondo 17. Street Lighting No No Only at traffic signal location CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Calle Tampico between Washington Street and Park Avenue I LOCATION: 10 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78680 Calle Tampico Date of Radar Measurement 9/23/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10:00 TO 11:00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 36 42 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 34-43 (65%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 35 mph 40 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 2.55 per MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 5 MPH reduction recommended based on roadway characteristics RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 mph 1 7 * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa TE 2341 State Registration Number STREET: Eisenhower Drive CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Calle Tampico and DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 11:00 OBSERVER: J. Lau C Avenida Bermudas LOCATION: 11 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical Yes Crest Vert. Curve 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Calle Tampico; Stop at Avenida Montezuma, Calle 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets Nogales, Calle (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Colima, Avenida Bermudas. Roundabout at Calle Sinaloa. 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 4 lanes, divided with 11' raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment 31' 31' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover Yes Yes (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting No No Only at traffic signal location STREET: Eisenhower Drive P CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas LOCATION: 11 Direction ART Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound' ❑ Westbound II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 51325 Eisenhower Dr Date of Radar Measurement 9/23/14 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13:00 TO 14:00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 37 41 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 34-43 (80%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 40 mph 40 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 2.55 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Fred Waring Drive between Washington Street and DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 9:30 OBSERVER: J.Lau C Jefferson Street LOCATION: 12 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical Yes Slight crest vert. curve 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways only on both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) No No Sidewalk on both 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Washington, 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets Palm Royale, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Adams, Dune Palms, Jefferson 10. Pavement Condition Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light 6 lanes, divided with Bike lane on both raised and painted sides from 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, medians Washington to undivided, painted, or raised median) Adams. Bike lane on S/S from Adams to Dune Palms 13. Street Width and Alignment 94' - straight (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Moderate (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) Yes Parking allowed on 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover North side from (yes or no) Adams to Dune Palms 17. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Fred Waring Drive between Washington Street and I Jefferson Street LOCATION: 12 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Souhbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78860 Sonesta Way Date of Radar Measurement 9/22/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 9:00 TO 9:30 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 43 49 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 39-48 (64%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 6 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 1.30 per MVM Actual 0.14 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). unoz TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Highway 111 between West City Limit and DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 10:15 OBSERVER: J. Lau C Adams Street LOCATION: 13 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) At -Grade At -Grade Driveways only on 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics both sides (at grade, dustpan, etc) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalk on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) Commercial Commercial 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc) No offsets TS at Plaza La 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets Quinta, Washington, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Simon, La Quinta Center, Adams 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with Raised median undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median varies from 8'-16' 50' - curved 58' - curved 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed on both sides (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting No No Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Highway 111 between West City Limit and C Adams Street LOCATION: 13 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78802 Highway 111 Date of Radar Measurement 9/22/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10:00 TO 10:30 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 35 42 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 35-44 (54%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 10 Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1.30 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.35 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Uniformity among adjacent street segments in neighboring municipalities RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). sa mu d i/( q5t I LA TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Highway 111 between DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 10:30 C Adams Street OBSERVER: J. Lau and East City Limit LOCATION: 14 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways only on (at grade, dustpan, etc) both sides 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalk on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) Commercial Commercial 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Adams, La (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Quinta, Dune Palm, Costco, Jefferson 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with Raised median a raised median varies from 22'-28' undivided, painted, or raised median) 46' - curved 52' - curved 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) No No No parking allowed 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover on both sides (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting No No Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Highway 111 between Adams Street 1- and East City Limit LOCATION: 14 Direction Bi-directional 0 Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 79450 Highway 111 Date of Radar Measurement 9/2212014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 12:30 TO 13:00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 35 42 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 31-40 (56%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 40 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 18 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-StatewideNear 1.30 per MVM Actual 0.57 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Uniformity among adjacent street segments in neighboring municipalities RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). I a munoz TE 2341 State Registration Number STREET: Monroe Street CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Avenue 60 DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 14:05 OBSERVER: J. Lau P and Avenue 62 LOCATION: 15 ART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved/unpaved Unpaved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade Dustpan Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No Yes Sidewalk on west side only sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Commercial, (residential, commercial, office, etc) residential agricultural fields 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets STOP @ 60,nand 62nd (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 3 lanes divided with a painted stripe and 1 lane in northbound undivided, painted, or raised median) raised median direction 13. Street Width and Alignment 25' 12' 6' raised median (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No parking restrictions (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting No STREET: Monroe Street C CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY between Avenue 60 and Avenue 62 LOCATION: 15 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 61510 Fire Barrel Dr Date of Radar Measurement 9/23/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 15:00 TO 16:00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 46 52 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 42-51 (60%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 60 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 0 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 1.35 per MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85'h percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph 7 1 * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ly TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Washington Street between Fred Waring Drive and Highway 111 DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 10:00 OBSERVER: J. Lau PJ LOCATION: 16 kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical Yes Crest Vert. Curve 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalks on both sides sidewalks (yes or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Vacant Residential, (residential, commercial, office, etc) Land, Tennis Center Commercial No offsets TS at Fred Waring, 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets Via Sevilla, Miles, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Channel, Highway 111 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Moderate Moderate 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 6 lanes, divided with 12'-15' raised undivided, painted, or raised median) a raised median median 13. Street Width and Alignment 39'-47' 40' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes Open space on S/B (yes or no) side 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed on both sides (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting Yes No Lighting at traffic signal locations also CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Washington Street between Fred Waring Drive and Highway 111 I LOCATION: 16 Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound ►RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 45200 Washington Street Date of Radar Measurement 9/22/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 9:30 TO 10:00 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 42 48 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 39-48 (63%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 1 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 1.30 per MVM Actual 0.03 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph 7 1 * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz TE 2341 State Registration Number CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Washington Street between Highway 111 and Eisenhower Drive DATE: 10/2/14 TIME: 10:45 OBSERVER: J. Lau LOCATION: 17 P) kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics At -Grade At -Grade Driveways on both (at grade, dustpan, etc) sides No No No sidewalk on 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without West side from sidewalks (yes or no) Point Happy to Lake La Quinta 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential, church, Commercial, office (residential, commercial, office, etc) vacant land No offsets TS at Eisenhower, 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets Avenue 48, Highway 111, (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Avenue 47, Point Happy 10. Pavement Condition Satisfactory Satisfactory (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 6 lanes, divided with 16' raised median. 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, a raised median Bike lane on both undivided, painted, or raised median) sides from Ave 48 to Eisenhower. 13. Street Width and Alignment 38' 38' (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Heavy Heavy (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed on both sides (yes or no) 17. Street Lighting No No Only at traffic signal locations CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Washington Street between Highway 111 and Eisenhower Drive PIA LOCATION: 17 Direction ART Bi-directional Northbound* ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Southbound ❑ Westbound II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 47647 Caleo Bay Date of Radar Measurement 9/22/2014 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 13:00 TO 13:30 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 43 48 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 39-48 (74%) Posted Limit Prevailing Limit 50 mph 50 mph PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2010 TO 12/31/2012 Number of Accidents Midblock 11 Midblock Accident Rate Acc/MVM Expected-Statewide/Year 1.30 per MVM Actual 0.25 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Closest to 85th percentile speed RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 mph * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). nessa TE 2341 State Registration Number Radar Speed Distribution Forms 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta CITY OF QUINTA .• 0A.• 0A FOR ROADWAY: ADAMS STREET VEHICLES SURVEYED - ' LOCATION: MILES AVENUE TO HIGHWAY 111 78950 HIGHWAY -.•. • PAINTED AND RAISED MEDIANS RATE: 0.42 EXPECTED-• ROADWAY F.. .. EXISTING PROPOSED ' 0" 0.0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0AT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0ACCIDENT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0HISTORY: ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0ACCIDENT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■000NDITIONS: MONO■■■■■■■■■■■©©©©MMMMMMM■■■■® M0000000000000113MMMMMMM00000000 M0000000000000113MMMMMMMMM000000 ©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■® MMMMMMMMMMM■■■■©MMMMMMMMMMM■■■® MMMMMMMMM■■■■■■©MMMMMMMMM■■■■■0 MMMMMMM■■■■■■■■©MMMMMMMMMMM■■■0AVERAGE MMMMMMMMMMM■■■■©MMMMMMMMM■■■■■® MMMMMMMMM■■■■■■©MMMMMMMMMMM■■■® MMMMMMMMMMMM■■■©MMMMMMMMM■■■■■® MMMMMMMMMM■■■■■©MMMMMMM■■■■■■■0 40 AVERAGE SPEED: 44 M.P.H. OVER MMMMMMMM■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 MMMMMM■■■■■■■■■©MMMM■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 MMM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© MMM■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 -• . • Filename: 01—ADAMS-MILES TO I I I.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF QUINTA . • :,STOP: VEHICLES SURVEYED -.•. • BY DOUBLEPARKING LANE . - • 2.00 ROADWAY • . WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED LIMIT: 40 SPEED LIMIT: 40 D. 00 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 MENOMONEE lMMMMMMMMMMMMMM ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0ACCIDENT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0HISTORY: ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 MONO■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■SPEED MMMMMM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 MMMM■■■■■■■■■■■©MM■■■■■■■■■■■■0AVERAGE MMMMM00000000011300000000■■■■■■0 MMMMM■■■■■■■■■■©MMMM■■■■■■■■■■0 MMMMMMMM■■■■■■■©MMMM■■■■■■■■■■® MOO■■■■■■■■■■■1©MMMMMM■■■■■■■■0 - ' SPEED: 39 M.P.H. MPH 0% MMMMMMMMMMM■■■■©MMMMMMM■■■■■■■0 1131130113003113■■■■■■■©M11301130031131111111111111111111111110 MMMMMMMMMMMM■■■©MMMMMM■■■■■■■■0 MMMM■■■■■■■■■■■©MMMMMMMM■■■■■■® MMMMMM■■■■■■■■■©MMMMMMMMMMM■■■0 MMMMMMMM■■■■■■■©MMMM■■■■■■■■■■® M0000001111■■■■■■■©M00000111111111111111111111111111111110AVERAGE MM■■■■■■■■■■■■■©MOO■■■■■■■■■■■© MM■■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©10 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MOO■■■■■■■■■■■■© ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©MM■■■■■■■■■■■■© ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 -•UERMIM01110 Filename: 02 AVE BERMUDAS-AVE 52 TO CALLE ARROBA.xls.xls 10/27/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9:23-14 TIME START: 9:OOAM TIME STOP: 10:OOAM FOR ROADWAY: 80159 AVENUE 50 SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES P A C E LOCATION: JEFFERSON STREET TO WEST BOUNDARY OF MOUNATIN VIEW TRACT ROAD DESCRIPTION: 2 LANES DIVIDED WITH TWLTL AND DOUBLE YELLOW ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 EXPECTED RATE: 1.55 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: FAIR WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45 SPEED LIMIT: 45 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,146 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.30 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 1 X 1 0 X X 2 x 1 0 x 1 XXXXXXX 7 XXXXXXXX 8 XXXXXXX 7 x x x x x x x x x 9 XXXXXXXX 8 XXXXXX 6 XXXXXX 6 xxxxxxxxxx 10 XXXXXXX 7 XXXXXX 6 85TH %: 48 M.P.H. 50TH %: 44 M.P.H. 15TH %: 39 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 45 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 74% % OVER PACE: 6% % UNDER PACE: 20% XXXXXXX 7 XXXXXXXX 8 X 1 X 1 X 1 X X 2 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 100 DATE Filename: 03 AVE 50-JEFFERSON TO W. BOUNDARY.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9-22-14 TIME START: 2:30PM TIME STOP: 3:30PM FOR ROADWAY: AVENUE 50 SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES P A L; E LOCATION: WEST BOUNDARY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW TRACT TO EAST BOUNDARY AT 79330 BRIARWOOD ROAD DESCRIPTION: 3 LANES DIVIDED BY RAISED MEDIAN ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.50 EXPECTED RATE: 1.55 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: FAIR WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50 SPEED LIMIT: 50 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,536 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.43 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 X 1 0 X 1 x 1 0 0 XXXXXXX 7 xxxxxxxx 8 XXXXXXX 7 Xxxxx 5 XXXXXXXXX 9 XxxxxxXx 8 x x x x x x 6 XXXXXXXXX 9 XXXXXXX 7 X x x x x 5 XXXXXXXXX 9 xxxxxx 6 XXXXXX 6 x 1 85TH %: 52 M.P.H. 50TH %: 47 M.P.H. 15TH %: 42 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 48 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 44 - 53 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 73% % OVER PACE: 10% % UNDER PACE: 17% X 1 0 X 1 X 1 0 X 1 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 100 DATE Filename: 04 AVE 50-W. BOUNDARY TO E. BOUNDARY.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9-22-14 TIME START: 1:30PM TIME STOP: 2:30PM FOR ROADWAY: AVENUE 50 SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES P A C E LOCATION: EAST BOUNDARY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW TRACT TO MADISON STREET AT 50075 DORAL STREET ROAD DESCRIPTION: 2 LANES DIVIDED WITH TWLTL ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 EXPECTED RATE: 1.55 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: FAIR WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50 SPEED LIMIT: 50 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 10,805 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X X 2 0 XXX 3 xxxxxxxx 8 XXXXX 5 xxxxxxxx 8 XXXXX 5 XXXXXXX 7 xxxxxxx 7 xxxxxxx 7 XXXXXXX 7 xxxxxxxx 8 XXXXXXX 7 xxxxxxxxxxx 11 XXXXX 5 XXXXX 5 85TH %: 51 M.P.H. 50TH %: 46 M.P.H. 15TH %: 42 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 47 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 43 - 52 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 72% % OVER PACE: 13% % UNDER PACE: 15% 0 0 X 1 0 X 1 X 1 0 0 0 0 o X 1 0 x 1 0 0 0 0 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 100 DATE Filename: 05 AVE 50-E BOUNDARY TO MADISON.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF QUINTA DATE: 9:23-14 TIME START: 2:OOPM TIME STOP: 2:30PM FOR ROADWAY: 78164 AVENUE 52 VEHICLES SURVEYED - -.•. • RAISED MEDIANAND BIKE •' 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 EXPECTED RATE: 1.55 ROADWAY • •GOOD •. EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED 0 SPEED 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 14,736 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.52 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ACCIDENT ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■J3E3E3E3E3E3MMMMMMMMMNNNNII ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■© ©0000000000000113©©©©©©000000000 ©©©©©©©0000000113©©©©©000000000® ©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■® ©©©©©©©0000000113©©©©©000000000® ©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■0 ©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■® ©©©©©©©0000000113©©©©0000000000® ©©©©©©©©000000113©©©©©0000000000 ©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■0AVERAGE ©©©©©©©0000000113©©©000000000000 ©©©©©000000000113©©©©©0000000000 ©©©©0000000000113©©©00000000■■■0 ©©©©©000000000113©©©©00000000000 -. 40 AVERAGE SPEED: 47 M.P.H. MPH % ER OVPACE: 14% UNDER ©©©1M©000000000113©©©1M■■■■■■■■■■0 ©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© ©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 monsoons ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■010 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 monsoons ■■■■■■■l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 -• 01101110 Filename: 06 AVE 52-BERMUDAS TO WASHINGTON.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF QUINTA DATE: 9:23-14 TIME START: 2:30PM TIME STOP: 3:OOPM FOR ROADWAY: VEHICLES SURVEYED - ' • • 78860 CITRUS -.•. • RAISED MEDIANAND BIKE ACCIDENT EXPECTED RATE: ROADWAY • •GOOD •. EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED 0 SPEED 0 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.54 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0AT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 00000000000000113©©©©0000000000© ©00000000000001©©©©©©0000000000HISTORY: ©©©©©©©0000000113©©©©■■■■■■■■■■® ©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■®ACCIDENT ©©©©©©©■■■■■■■1©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■ ©©©©©©©©000000113©©©©©0000000000 ©©©©©©©0000000113©©©©©000000000® ©©©©©©©©■■■■■■1©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■® ©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■® ©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■® ©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■® ©©©©©000000000113©©©©©0000000000 ©©©©©©■■■■■■■■1©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■® ©©©©©©00000000113©©©©00000000000AVERAGE ©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■010,003 ©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© .. ., SPEED: 50 M.P.H. 4. .:% ER OVPACE: 14% ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 monsoons 1000000000000000AVERAGE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 -•1111110111111 Filename: 07_AVE 52-WASHINGTON TO JEFFERSON.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 10/24/14 TIME START: 9:OOAM TIME STOP: 10:41AM FOR ROADWAY: BLACKHAWK WAY SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES LOCATION: ADAMS STREET TO DUNE PALMS ROAD AT THE END OF LA QUINTA PARK ROAD DESCRIPTION: 2 LANES DIVIDED WITH PAINTED MEDIAN AND BIKE LANES ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.49 EXPECTED RATE: 2.55 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: FAIR WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 SPEED LIMIT: 35 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,684 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 1 0 0 x 1 0 x x 2 0 X 1 X X X 3 XX XXX 5 P A C E 85TH %: 38 M.P.H. 50TH %: 33 M.P.H. 15TH%: 27 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 34 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 68% % OVER PACE: 28% % UNDER PACE: 5% X 1 X X X X jxx 6 X X XXX 5 XXX X 4 XXX XXXXXXX 10 XXX XXX 6 X X X X X XXXXXX 11 XXX XX 5 XXXX XXXX 8 XX XXXXXX 8 XXXX X X 6 XX XX 4 XXXXXX X 7 XXX XXX 6 X X 2 X 1 X 1 0 OBSERVED BY: KEVIN WHELEN REVIEWED BY: 0 X 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 105 DATE Filename: 08 BLACKHAWK - ADAMS TO DUNE PALMS.xls.xls 10/27/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9:23-14 TIME START: 11:OOAM TIME STOP: 12:OOPM FOR ROADWAY: 78200 CALLE TAMPICO SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES P A C E LOCATION: EISHENHOWER DRIVE TO WASHINGTON STREET ROAD DESCRIPTION: 4 LANES DIVIDED WITH RAISED MEDIAN AND BIKE LANES ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.17 EXPECTED RATE: 2.55 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: GOOD WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 SPEED LIMIT: 45 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,193 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.74 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 1 X 1 0 0 x 1 X X 2 X x 2 XXXXX X 6 XXX XXX 6 xxxx xxx 7 xxx xxxx 7 XXXXXXX XX 9 x x x x x 5 XXXXX XXXXX 10 X xxx 4 XXX XX 5 xx xxxx 6 85TH %: 48 M.P.H. 50TH %: 43 M.P.H. 15TH %: 37 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 44 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 64% % OVER PACE: 7% % UNDER PACE: 29% X X 2 X X X X jxxx 7 XXX X X 5 XX XXX 5 X 1 0 X 1 X xxx 4 X X 2 x x 2 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 101 DATE Filename: 09 CALLE TAMPICO-EISENHOWER TO WASHINGTON.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9:23-14 TIME START: 10:OOAM TIME STOP: 11:OOAM FOR ROADWAY: 78680 CALLE TAMPICO SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES LOCATION: WASHINGTON STREET TO PARK AVENUE ROAD DESCRIPTION: 2 LANES DIVIDED WITH DOUBLE YELLOW AND BIKE LANES ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 EXPECTED RATE: 2.55 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: GOOD WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 SPEED LIMIT: 35 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,563 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 1 0 X 1 0 0 x 1 x x x 3 0 X X 2 x x 2 X 1 Xx xX 4 XXX XXXX 7 x XXXX 5 P A C E 85TH %: 42 M.P.H. 50TH %: 36 M.P.H. 15TH %: 31 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 37 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 65% % OVER PACE: 11 % % UNDER PACE: 24% XXX X X 5 X X X X jxxxx 8 XXX XXX 6 XXxxx xxxxX 10 XXXX X X 6 XXX xXxxxx 9 XXXX X 5 Xx xX 4 X XXX 4 X x x 3 X X X X 4 X x 2 X X 2 X x 2 X 1 0 X 1 0 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: X 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 L 0 0 0 FFTFTTT 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 100 DATE Filename: 10 CALLE TAMPICO-W ASHINGTON TO PARK.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF QUINTA DATE: 9:23-14 TIME START: 1:OOPM TIME STOP: 2:OOPM FOR ROADWAY: 51325 EISENHOWER DRIVE VEHICLES SURVEYED -.•. • RAISED MEDIAN •' 0 0.00 EXPECTED-• ROADWAY • . ••D .. PROPOSED 40 SPEED 40 8,109 :. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0ACCIDENT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©0000000■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0EXISTING ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 monsoons ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0AVERAGE ©0000000000000113©©©©©0000000000 ©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■® ©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■® ©©©©©©©©©■■■■■1©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■® - ' SPEED: 38 M.P.H. 10 MPH :0% OVER .% ©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■® 1131130113003113■■■■■■■©©11301130031131111111111111111111111110 ©©©©©©©0000000113©©©©©©©©0000000 ©©©©©©©©©©©000113©©©©©©000000000 ©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■0 ©©©©©©©00000001©©©©©©©©©0000000 ©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■®AVERAGE ©©©©©©000000001©©©©©00000000000 ©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©©©■■■■■■■■■■■1©©©©000000000000 ©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 -•UERMIM0110 Filename: 11_EISENHOWER-CALLE TAMPICO TO BERMUDAS.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF QUINTA DATE: 9-22-14 TIME START: . OO.STOP:9:30AM FOR ROADWAY: FRED WARING DRIVE VEHICLES SURVEYED ' 78860 SONESTA ROAD • RAISED AND PAINTED MEDIANS 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: GOOD .. EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED 0 SPEED 0 AVERAGE- D' 00 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0AT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0ACCIDENT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0HISTORY: ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■© ©©©00000000000113©©©000000000000 ©©©00000000000113©©©000000000000 ©©©©©©00000000113©©©©00000000■■0 ©©©©©©©©©00000113©©000000000000® ©©©©©©©0000000113©©©1M©©©©0000000 ©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■® ©©©©■■■■■■■■■■1©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■0 ©©©©©©©©000000113©©©©©©000000000101100 ©©©©©©©■■■■■■■1©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■® ©©©©0000000000113©©©©©©©©000000® ,. 4: .4% OVER 0% .% ©©©©©■■■■■■■■■1©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■0 ©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■® ©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■13©©©■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©©©00000000000113©©©000000000000 ©©000000000000113©©©000000000000 ©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 - 01101110 Filename: 12 FRED WARING-JEFFERSON TO WASH INGTON-l.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9-22-14 TIME START: 10:OOAM TIME STOP: 10:30AM FOR ROADWAY: 78802 HIGHWAY 111 SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES LOCATION: WEST CITY LIMITS TO ADAMS STREET ROAD DESCRIPTION: 6 LAMES DIVIDED WITH RAISED MEDIANS ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.35 EXPECTED RATE: 1.30 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: FAIR WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50 SPEED LIMIT: 45 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 26,294 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 1 0 0 x X X 3 0 x x x 3 X XXX 4 X X X X x 5 XXXXXXX X X 9 XXXXXX XXX 9 XXXX XXXXXX 10 XXXXXX XXX 9 P A C E 85TH %: 42 M.P.H. 50TH%: 35 M.P.H. 15TH%: 29 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 36 M.P.H. 10MPH PACE: 35 - 44 M.P.H. %IN PACE: 54% %OVER PACE: 8% % UNDER PACE: 39% XXXX XXXX 8 XXXXXXXX jxxxx 12 XXXXXX XXXXX ll XXXXXXX XXXXXX 13 XXXXXX XXXXXX 12 XXXXXXX XXXXXXX 14 X XXXXX 6 XXXXXX XX 8 XXXX XXXXXX 10 x XXXXXXXX 9 XXXXXXXX XXXX 12 XXX XXXXXXX 10 XXXXXXX 7 XX XX 4 x x XXXX 6 X 1 X XXX 4 0 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 200 DATE Filename: 13 HIGHWAY I I 1-WCL TO ADAMS-l.xls.xls 10/27/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9-22-14 TIME START: 12:30PM TIME STOP: 1:OOPM FOR ROADWAY: 79-450 HIGHWAY 111 SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES LOCATION: ADAMS AVENUE TO EST CITY LIMITS ROAD DESCRIPTION: 6 LANES DIVIDED WITH RAISED MEDIAN ACCIDENT HISTORY: 18 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.57 EXPECTED RATE: 1.30 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: FAIR WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50 SPEED LIMIT: 45 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 28,994 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxxx 4 x 1 XXX XXXX 7 xxx xxxx 7 XXX X 4 xxxxxxxxx xx 11 XXX XXXXX 8 XXXXXX x x x 9 P A C E 185TH%: 42 M.P.H. 50TH%: 35 M.P.H. 15TH%: 29 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 36 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 56% % OVER PACE: 26% % UNDER PACE: 19% XXXXXX XXXXX 11 XXXXXXX jxxx 10 XXXXX XXXXXXX 12 xxxxxxxx XXXXX 13 XXXXX XXXX 9 XXXXXX XXXXXXX 13 XXXXXXXX XXXXX 13 XXXXX XXXXXX 11 XXX XXXXX 8 Xxxxx XXXXXXX 12 X XXXX 5 xx XXXXXX 8 XXX 3 xx XXXX 6 X X XXXX 6 x XXXX 5 X 1 X 1 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: X 1 0 X 1 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 200 DATE Filename: 14 HIGHWAY I l I-ADAMS TO ECL-I.xls.xls 10/27/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9:23-14 TIME START: 3:OOPM TIME STOP: 4:OOPM FOR ROADWAY: MONROE STREET SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES r A C E LOCATION: AVENUE 60 TO AVENUE 62 AT 61510 FIRE BARREL DR ROAD DESCRIPTION: 2-3 LANES DIVIDED WITH RAISED MEDIAN ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 EXPECTED RATE: 1.35 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: FAIR WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 60 SPEED LIMIT: 50 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,067 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 X 1 0 0 x jxx 3 X X X 3 x x 2 X XXXX 5 x x x x 4 X X X X 4 xXxxx 5 X XXX 4 Xx XXXX 6 xxxx xxx 7 xxx x x 5 XXXXX XX 7 xxxx xxxx 8 XXXX X X X 7 Xx xxx 5 XXXX XX 6 xxx x 4 85TH %: 52 M.P.H. 50TH %: 46 M.P.H. 15TH %: 40 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 47 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 60% % OVER PACE: 22% % UNDER PACE: 18% X X X X 4 X X 2 XXX 3 X X 2 0 X 1 X 1 0 X 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 100 DATE Filename: 15 MONROE-AVE 60 TO AVE 62.xls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA DATE: 9-22-14 TIME START: 9:30AM TIME STOP: 10:OOAM FOR ROADWAY: 45200 WASHINGTON STREET SPEED (MPH) VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL VEHICLES P A C LOCATION: FRED WARING TO HIGHWAY 111 ROAD DESCRIPTION: 6 LANES DIVIDED WITH RAISED MEDIAN ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.03 EXPECTED RATE: 1.30 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: FAIR WEATHER: CLEAR EXISTING PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50 SPEED LIMIT: 50 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 30,396 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.11 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x IX 2 XXX 3 x x x 3 XXX XX 5 0 X X X 3 xx xx 4 XXXXXX X X 8 X xxxxx 6 x x x x x x x x x 9 x x x x x x 6 XXX XXXXXXXXX 12 xxxxxxxx x x x x 12 XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX 17 xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx 1 16 XXXX XXXXXXXXX 13 E x x x x x XXXXXX 11 85TH%: 50TH %: 42 M.P.H. 15TH %: 37 M.P.H. AVERAGE SPEED: 43 M.P.H. 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 M.P.H. % IN PACE: 63% % OVER PACE: 17% % UNDER PACE: 20% XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX 16 XXXXXXX jxxxxxxx 14 X X X X X XXX 8 XX xx 4 XXXX X X 6 X X x 3 XXXX X X 6 X x 2 X X 2 x 1 X X XXX 5 0 X 1 0 0 x 1 0 0 OBSERVED BY: MIKE ALMIR REVIEWED BY: 0 0 X 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 L I I I I I 1 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 200 DATE Filename: 16 WASHINGTON-FRED WARING TO I I Lxls.xls 10/23/2014 CITY OF QUINTA DATE: 9-22-14 TIME START: 1:OOPM TIME STOP: 1:30PM FOR -••DWASHINGTON STREET VEHICLES SURVEYED LOCATION: HIGHWAY 111 TO EISENHOWER DRIVE 464•=' -.•. . • RAISED MEDIAN RATE: 0.25 EXPECTED RATE: 1.30 ROADWAY F.. WEATHER: CLEAR PROPOSED SPEED 0 SPEED 0 TRAFFIC: 30,323 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.33 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0AT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0ACCIDENT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0HISTORY: M0000000■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ACCIDENT ©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■000NDITIONS: MMMMM000000000113MM0000000000000 ©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■0EXISTING MMMMMMMMM00000113MMMMMM000000000 ©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■® MMMMMM■■■■■■■■■©MMMMMMMMM■■■■■®AVERAGE MMMMMMMMMMMM00113MMMMMMMMMMMMM00'DAILY MMMMM■■■■■■■■■■©MMMMM■■■■■■■■■0 MMMMMMMM■■■■■■■©MMMMMMMM■■■■■■0 MMMMMMMMM00000113MMM00000000000® ,. OVER .% MMMM■■■■■■■■■■■13MMMMMMMMM000000 MMMMMMM■■■■■■■■©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■® MMM■■■■■■■■■■■■©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■© Monosson ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■soon■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 -•UERMIM0110 Filename: 17_WASHINGTON-I I 1 TO EISENHOWER.xls.xls 10/23/2014 APPENDIX B Survey Equipment 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for this survey were a Falcon Hand -Held traffic Radar unit and a Road Runner Hand -Held traffic Radar unit. Both radar units are manufactured by Kustom Signals Inc. of Lenexa, Kansas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Flacon Hand -Held Traffic Radar, SN# FF10, was last calibrated on February 7, 2014 by RHF Inc., and the Road Runner Hand -Held Traffic Radar, SN# RR22, was last calibrated on February 7, 2014 by RHF Inc. 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta APPENDIX C Speed Limit Map 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta LEGEND: SPEED LIMIT MPH 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 = CITY LIMITS CITY OF LA QUINTA SPEED LIMITS 58 10 W W R' 7- PREPARED NOVEMBER 2014 WILL©AN Engineering