2020 Engineering & Traffic Survey - Segments of Eisenhower Dr (October 20, 2020)Table 1
Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes
NEW
No
STREET
FROM
TO
POSTED
SPEEED
POSTED
CHANGE
LIMIT
SPEED
LIMIT
58 Eisenhower Drive
Avenue 50
Calle Tampico
45
40
-5
Avenue
59
Eisenhower Drive
Calle Tampico
40
30
-10
Montezuma
60
Eisenhower Drive
Avenue
Calle Sinaloa
40
35
-5
Montezuma
58 Eisenhower Drive Avenue 50 to Calle 0.48 N/S 44 35-44 76% 11,231 1.44 0.00 45
Tampico
Calle Tampico to o
59 Eisenhower Drive Avenue Montezuma 0.12 N/S 30 24-33 88 /0 11,231 1.44 0.00 40
T60Eisenhower Drive Avenue Montezuma 0.25 N/S 38 30-39 84% 11,231 1.44 0.33 40
to Calle Sinaloa
*NB is posted 25 mph when children are present
CA
40 MUTCD
Option 2
85tn
30* Percentile
Speed
CA
35 MUTCD
Option 2
2020 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of La Quinta
Page 2
52
STREET: Eisenhower Drive
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
between Avenue 50
and Calle Tampico
DATE: 9/22/20 TIME: 11:25 OBSERVER: Steve Librincg_ LOCATION: 58
C
kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes
es or no
1. Horizontal
No
No
2. Vertical
Yes
Yes
Crest Curve
3. Superelevation (%)
None
None
4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved)
Paved
Paved
5. Profile Conditions (grade,%)
None
None
Driveways only at
6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics
Apts. &school
(at grade, dustpan, etc)
7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without
No
No
Sidewalk on both
sides
sidewalks (yes or no)
8. Adjacent Land Use
Residential
Residential
(residential, commercial, office, etc)
yl
-School;
No offsets
TS at Avenue 50,
9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets
roundabout at Calle
(spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no)
Tampico
10. Pavement Condition
Good
Good
(good, satisfactory, poor)
11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light)
Light
Light
2 lanes with a bike
2 lanes with a bike
4 lanes, divided with
lane
lane
a raised median &
12. Channelization ( # of lanes, divided,
bike lanes on both
undivided, painted, or raised median)
sides. — SB narrows
to 1 lane
13. Street Width and Alignment
33'
33'
12' raised median
(width, feet — straight or curved)
14. Street Length
0.48
5,171
6,060
11,231 total
15. Average Daily Traffic
Collected on
8/31 /16
16. Traffic Flow Characteristics
Light
Light
(heavy, moderate, light)
17. Uniformity with the Community
Yes
Yes
(yes or no)
18. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover
No
No
No parking allowed
(yes or no)
on both sides
Only at traffic signal
Only at traffic signal
SB transition has
19. Street Lighting
and roundabout
and roundabout
lighting
53
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET: Eisenhower Drive
P
between Avenue 50
and Calle Tampico
LOCATION: 58
❑ Northbound* ❑ Southbound'
Direction Bi-directional -t ❑ Eastbound' ❑ Westbound'
1RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT
Location of Radar Measurement Just S/0 Crest
Date of Radar Measurement 9/21/2020
Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 10:30 AM —11:30 AM
50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 40 44
10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 35-44
Average Speed (mph) 40
Number of Samples Observed 100
Posted Limit (mph) 45
A
RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS
Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2012 TO 12/31/2014
Number of Midblock 5
Accidents
Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 1.44 per MVM
Accident Rate
Acc/MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM
PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS
California MUTCD Option 2
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph
* May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided
CERTIFICATION: I, Jeffrey Lau, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta
was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a
Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2835
Jeffrey Lau Date State Registration Number
54
A
RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS
Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2012 TO 12/31/2014
Number of Midblock 5
Accidents
Midblock Expected-StatewideNear 1.44 per MVM
Accident Rate
Acc/MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM
PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS
California MUTCD Option 2
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph
* May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided
CERTIFICATION: I, Jeffrey Lau, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta
was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a
Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2835
Jeffrey Lau Date State Registration Number
54
PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS
California MUTCD Option 2
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 mph
* May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided
CERTIFICATION: I, Jeffrey Lau, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta
was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a
Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2835
Jeffrey Lau Date State Registration Number
54
STREET: Eisenhower Drive
DATE: 9/21 /20 TIME:
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
between Calle Tampico and
Avenue Montezuma
OBSERVER: Steve Libring LOCATION: 59
PART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Sight Distance Obstructions? S/B N/B Notes
(yes or no
1. Horizontal
No
No
2. Vertical
No
No
3. Superelevation (%)
None
4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved)
Paved
Paved
5. Profile Conditions (grade,%)
6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics
(at grade, dustpan, etc)
At -Grade
At -Grade
Driveways on both
sides
7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without
sidewalks (yes or no)
No
No
Sidewalk on both
sides
8. Adjacent Land Use
Residential
Commercial
(residential, commercial, office, etc)
9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets
(spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no)
No offsets
Roundabout at
Calle Tampico and
at Montezuma
10. Pavement Condition
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
(good, satisfactory, poor)
11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light)
Light
Light
1 lane with bike lane
1 lane with bike lane
11' raised median
12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided,
undivided, painted, or raised median)
31'
31'
13. Street Width and Alignment
(width, feet — straight or curved)
Length
0.12
714.Street
5,171
6,060
11,231 total
15. Average Daily traffic
Collected on
8/31 /16
Light
16. Traffic Flow Characteristics
Light
(heavy. moderate, light
17. Uniformity with the Community
_
Yes
Yes
(yes or no)
18. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover
Yes
Yes
(yes or no)
No
No
Only at roundabouts
19. Street Lighting
55
STREET: Eisenhower Drive
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
between Calle Tampico and Avenue Montezuma
LOCATION: 59
Direction
FIE Northbound *
Bi-directional ❑Eastbound *
❑ Southbound
❑Westbound
1RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT
Location of Radar Measurement
Date of Radar Measurement
9/21/20
Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour)
12:15 PM —1:30 PM
50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph)
27 30
10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles)
24-33
Posted Limit
Prevailing Limit
40
PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS
Time Period Evaluated
Number of Midblock
Accidents
Midblock Expected-StatewideNear
Accident Rate
YA��An lrkfh Actual
PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS
111 /2010 TO 12/31 /2012
W
1.44 per MVM
0.00 per MVM
Closest to 85th Percentile Speed
I RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30" mph 1
* May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided.
**NB is posted 25 mph when children are present.
CERTIFICATION: I, Jeffrey Lau, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta
was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a
Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2835
Jeffrey Lau Date State Registration Number
56
STREET: Eisenhower Drive
DATE: 9/22/20 TIME:
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
between Avenue Montezuma and Calle Sinaloa
OBSERVER: Steve Libring LOCATION: 60
PART I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Sight Distance Obstructions?
S/B
N/B
Notes
es or no)
1. Horizontal
No
No
2. Vertical
No
No
3. Superelevation (%)
None
4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved)
Paved
Paved
5. Profile Conditions (grade,%)
At -Grade
At -Grade
Driveways on both
6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics
sides
(at grade, dustpan, etc)
7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without
No
No
Sidewalk on both
sides
sidewalks (yes or no)
F&A�acent Land UseResidential
Residential
esidential, commercial, office, etc)
No offsets
Roundabout at
9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets
p g
Calle Sinaloa and at
(spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no)
Montezuma
10. Pavement Condition
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
(good, satisfactory, poor)
11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light
Light
1 lane with bike lane
1 lane with bike lane
11' raised median
12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided,
undivided, painted, or raised median)
13. Street Width and Alignment 31'
31'
(width, feet — straight or curved)
0.25
14. Street Length
5,171
6,060
11,231 total
15. Average Daily Traffic
Collected n 8/31/16
16. Traffic Flow Characteristics
Light
Light
(heavy, moderate, light)
17. Uniformity with the Community
Yes
Yes
(yes or no)
18. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover
Yes
Yes
(yes or no)
19. Street Lighting
No
No
Only at roundabouts
57
STREET: Eisenhower Drive
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
between Avenue Montezuma and Calle Sinaloa
LOCATION: 60
Direction Bi-directional
El Northbound
❑ Eastbound'
❑ Southbound'
❑ Westbound"
1RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT
Location of Radar Measurement
Date of Radar Measurement
9/21/20
Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour)
1:40 PM — 2:30 PM
50%ile (mph)
85%ile (mph)
34
38
10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles)
30-39
Posted Limit
Prevailing Limit
40
PART III: ACCIDENT RECORDS
Time Period Evaluated
Number of Midblock
Accidents
Midblock Expected-StatewideNear
Accident Rate
Acc/MVM Actual
PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS
1 /1 /2012 TO 12/31 /2014
C
1.44 per MVM
0.33 per MVM
California MUTCD Option 2
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 1 35 mph
May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided.
CERTIFICATION: I, Jeffrey Lau, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta
was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a
Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2835
Jeffrey Lau Date State Registration Number
W
DAR9Y ROAD
F
H
�HpD�VE
r
LEGEND:
L
a
W S
;7
WY 111
SPEED LIMIT MPH
W
25
c�
I
30
Ln 7=
- 35
— 40
— 45
50
SH A
N E
I
55
-
W
50
- = CITY LIMITS
m
ALLE
�1
c
AVFNU
z
t
�z.
z
0
s
W
4
4
W
AVENUE54
a
i
W
s
CALLE TECATE
AIRPORT A
CITY OF
LA QUINTA
SPEED LIMITS
L
V UE 58
W
�
W
6'
F
Z
❑
N
H
W
t
Se
AVENUE 0
PREPARED OCTOBER 2020
N.T.S.
!AVENUE sx