Loading...
2020 12 15 CouncilCITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 DECEMBER 15, 2020 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2020 3:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION | 4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION ****************************** SPECIAL NOTICE Teleconferencing and Telephonic Accessibility In Effect Pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, N-33-20, N-35-20, and N-60- 20 executed by the Governor of California, and the directives under the “Regional Stay At Home Order” from the California Department of Public Health, in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.), members of the City Council, the City Manager, City Attorney, City Staff, and City Consultants may participate in this regular meeting by teleconference. Additionally, pursuant to the above-referenced orders, members of the public are instructed to stay at home and to limit mixing with other persons or households as much as possible. Therefore, members of the public temporarily are not permitted to physically attend at City Hall the meeting to which this agenda applies, but any member of the public may listen or participate in the open session of this meeting as specified below. Members of the public wanting to listen to the open session of the meeting may do so by tuning-in live via http://laquinta.12milesout.com/video/live.   Members of the public wanting to address the City Council during the open session, either for public comment or for a specific agenda item, or both, are requested to send an email notification to the La Quinta City Clerk’s Office at CityClerkMail@LaQuintaCA.gov, and specify the following information: City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City’s web page: www.LaQuintaCA.gov CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 DECEMBER 15, 2020 1) Full Name 4) Public Comment or Agenda Item Number 2) City of Residence 5) Subject 3) Phone Number 6) Written or Telephonic Verbal Comments The email “subject line” must clearly state “Written Comments” or “Telephonic Verbal Comments.” Telephonic verbal public comments – requests to speak must be emailed to the City Clerk no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and general public for the item(s) by contacting him/her via phone and queuing him/her to speak. Only one person at a time may speak by telephone and only after being recognized by the Mayor. Written public comments must be received by the City Clerk’s Office no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City Council, incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk’s Office can accommodate such request. It would be appreciated that any email communications for public comments related to the items on the agenda, or for general public comment, are provided to the City Clerk’s Office at the email address listed above prior to the commencement of the meeting. If that is not possible, and to accommodate public comments on items that may be added to the agenda after its initial posting or items that are on the agenda, every effort will be made to attempt to review emails received by the City Clerk’s Office during the course of the meeting. The Mayor will endeavor to take a brief pause before action is taken on any agenda item to allow the City Clerk to review emails and share any public comments received during the meeting. All emails received by the City Clerk, at the email address above, until the adjournment of the meeting, will be included within the public record relating to the meeting. ****************************** CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda by emailing written public comments or requests to provide verbal public comments via teleconference as indicated above. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3 DECEMBER 15, 2020 Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) 2. THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (a) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. CONSULTATION WITH: ALEXANDER JOHNSTON, SENIOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR; WILLIAM H. IHRKE, CITY ATTORNEY (Review Continued Need and Response to Proclaimed State and Local Emergencies Caused by COVID-19) RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTIONS(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda by emailing written public comments or requests to provide verbal public comments via teleconference as indicated above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). BUSINESS SESSION PAGE 1. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY THE OFFICIAL CANVASS OF ELECTION RESULTS FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 3, 2020 [RESOLUTION NO. 2020-041] 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 DECEMBER 15, 2020 PRESENTATIONS 1. ADMINISTER OATHS OF OFFICE TO RE-ELECTED MAYOR EVANS, AND COUNCILMEMBERS FITZPATRICK AND SANCHEZ 2. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF ELECTION TO RE-ELECTED MAYOR EVANS, AND COUNCILMEMBERS FITZPATRICK AND SANCHEZ 3. CITY HALL VIRTUAL ANNUAL HOLIDAY OPEN HOUSE BUSINESS SESSION – CONTINUED PAGE 2. SELECT MAYOR PRO TEMPORE TO SERVE FOR ONE YEAR 31 ANNOUNCEMENTS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – NONE CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2020 33 2. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTER DATED DECEMBER 4, 2020 37 3. RECEIVE AND FILE FIRST QUARTER 2020-21 TREASURY REPORTS FOR JULY, AUGUST, AND SEPTEMBER 2020 49 4. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT 97 5. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE REPORT 101 6. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE CITYWIDE MISCELLANEOUS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2020-02 115 7. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 SALARY SCHEDULE INCREASING THE MINIMUM WAGE RATE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2021 [RESOLUTION NO. 2020-042] 119 8. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 586 ON SECOND READING AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS 125 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 DECEMBER 15, 2020 9. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 587 ON SECOND READING AMENDING CHAPTER 12.69 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO GOLF CARTS AND LOW SPEED VEHICLES 147 BUSINESS SESSION – CONTINUED PAGE 3. APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE AS CITY REPRESENTATIVES ON VARIOUS OUTSIDE AGENCIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021 155 4. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH FIND FOOD BANK FOR FOOD DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS RELATED TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC 159 5. APPROVE MODIFIED COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS EMERGENCY ECONOMIC RELIEF PROGRAM FOR LA QUINTA BUSINESSES IMPACTED BY COVID-19 169 STUDY SESSION PAGE 1. DISCUSS SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 173 PUBLIC HEARINGS – after 5:00 p.m. For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed “Request to Speak” form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or speak via teleconference in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. PAGE 1. CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 6, 2020: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0006, AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 AMENDMENT NO. 2, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PROPOSING AN APPROXIMATE 125,000 SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER WITH DRIVE-THROUGHS AND A 63,000 SQUARE-FOOT SUPERMARKET WITH ASSOCIATED VEHICLE FUEL CENTER. CEQA: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. LOCATION: 221 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6 DECEMBER 15, 2020 NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 50 AND JEFFERSON STREET. PROJECT: PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER [RESOLUTION NOS. 2020-043 AND 2020-044] 2. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020- 0006 (SDP 2013-924, AMENDMENT 1) TO AMEND SIGNATURE AT PGA WEST SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANS; CEQA: PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT COMPLETED FOR EDEN ROCK AT PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATION: WITHIN THE PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN AREA [RESOLUTION NO. 2020-045] 623 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY RESOURCES 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT - UPDATE ON PREPARATION OF THE 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE OCTOBER 2021-OCTOBER 2029 PLANNING PERIOD 771 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC WORKS MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 6. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 7. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 8. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Peña) 9. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (Fitzpatrick) 10. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Radi) 11. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Peña) 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 13. SILVERROCK EVENT SITE AD HOC COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 14. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Sanchez) 15. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Peña) 16. CVAG VALLEY-WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Peña) 17. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE (Peña) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 7 DECEMBER 15, 2020 18. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT – ENERGY CONSUMERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (Peña) 19. COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS EMERGENCY ECONOMIC RELIEF PROGRAM AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Radi) 19. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Radi) 20. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Radi) 21. CITYWIDE SECURITY CAMERAS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Radi) 22. GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Radi) 23. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Radi & Sanchez) 24. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 25. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC WORKS POLICY COMMITTEE (Sanchez) 26. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 27. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED OCTOBER 27, 2020 773 28. FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES DATED NOVEMBER 4, 2020 777 29. SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES DATED NOVEMBER 5, 2020 783 ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The regular meeting of the City Council scheduled for January 5, 2021, has been cancelled. The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on January 19, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk, of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City’s website, near the entrance to the Council Chambers at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at the Stater Brothers Supermarket at 78630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on December 11, 2020. DATED: December 11, 2020 MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 8 DECEMBER 15, 2020 Public Notices  The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777- 7092, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made.  If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777-7092. A one (1) week notice is required.  If background material is to be presented to the Councilmembers during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting.  Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Community Development counter at City Hall located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY THE OFFICIAL CANVASS OF ELECTION RESULTS FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 3, 2020 RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to certify the official canvass of election results for the General Municipal Election held November 3, 2020. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  A general municipal election was held on November 3, 2020, to fill the seat of the Mayor and two members of the City Council.  The City Clerk as Election Official is required to submit the certified results of the election to the governing body following certification of results by the Riverside County Registrar of Voters (ROV).  Per the Election Code, the City Council shall certify that the person receiving the highest number of votes for each office, and that the person who receives a plurality of the votes cast for any office is elected to that office.  The following candidates received the highest number of votes cast: For Mayor: LINDA EVANS For Council: STEVE SANCHEZ KATHLEEN FITZPATRICK FISCAL IMPACT – None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the May 19, 2020 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020- 010 giving notice of a General Municipal Election to be held in November for the election of a Mayor and two City Councilmembers. The election was held on November 3, 2020, and the voters elected Linda Evans as Mayor for a term of two years, and Kathleen Fitzpatrick and Steve Sanchez as Councilmembers for a term of four years each. BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 9 The deadline for the ROV to provide the Certification of Election Results to the La Quinta City Clerk was December 3, 2020, and the certified results are attached as Exhibit A to the Resolution. ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives to the recommended action. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 10 RESOLUTION NO. 2020 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON THE THIRD (3rd) DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of La Quinta, California, on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law, candidates were nominated to fill the vacancy or vacancies as provided by law; the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities and the Charter of the City of La Quinta; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to the City of La Quinta, and said results are received, attached and made a part hereof as Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, said General Municipal election was held for the purpose of electing the following officers of said City as required by the laws relating to cities in the State of California:  One (1) Mayor of the City Council for the full term of two (2) years; and  Two (2) Members of the City Council for the full term of four (4) years each. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the names of persons, in alpha order, voted for during said election for Mayor of the La Quinta City Council is as follows:  LINDA EVANS  ROBERT F. SYLK 11 Resolution No. 2020 – 0XX November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election Results Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 2 of 3 SECTION 2. That the names of persons, in alpha order, voted for during said election for Members of the La Quinta City Council is as follows:  KATHLEEN FITZPATRICK  RICHARD GRAY  STEVE SANCHEZ SECTION 3. That the City Council does declare and determine that LINDA EVANS was elected as Mayor for the full term of two (2) years; and KATHLEEN FITZPATRICK and STEVE SANCHEZ were elected as Members of the City Council for the full term of four (4) years each. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons so elected, a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected, the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the Office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into permanent retention. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 15th day of December, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 12 Resolution No. 2020 – 0XX November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election Results Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: ________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 13 14 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-0XX EXHIBIT A 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: SELECT MAYOR PRO TEMPORE TO SERVE FOR ONE YEAR RECOMMENDATION Select a member of the City Council to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore for one year. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The mayor pro tempore is the presiding officer at all City Council meetings and related functions and activities when the Mayor is absent. The selection of Mayor Pro Tempore is governed by State law and City resolution. The laws require the Council to choose one of its members as Mayor Pro Tempore at the same meeting it declares the results of a general municipal election, or during odd-numbered years, at a regular meeting in the last calendar quarter. FISCAL IMPACT – None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Council’s Rules of Procedure prescribes that the selection of a Mayor Pro Tempore shall be by three or more affirmative votes, and a failure to achieve such total of affirmative votes, shall be deemed a selection of the incumbent to remain in office. The Resolution also stipulates that a successor or replacement Mayor Pro Tempore may be chosen at any time by three or more affirmative votes. The office has been held by the following officials in recent years. 2016 – Mayor Pro Tem Peña 2017 – Mayor Pro Tem Radi 2018 – Mayor Pro Tem Fitzpatrick 2019 – Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez 2020 – Mayor Pro Tem Peña ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives to the recommended action. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 31 32 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 3 DECEMBER 9, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2020 CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Evans. This meeting provided teleconference accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, N-33-20, N-35-20, and N-60-20 executed by the Governor of California, and the directives under the “Regional Stay At Home Order” from the California Department of Public Health, in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code §54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: City Manager McMillen, City Attorney Ihrke, Finance Director Romero, City Clerk Radeva, Assistant to the City Manager Villalpando, and Community Resources Director Escobedo PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE City Manager McMillen led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA City Clerk Radeva said the following WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS, listed in alphabetical order, were received as of 5:00 p.m., which were distributed to Council and incorporated into the agenda packet and public records of this meeting:  Jack Gilles, La Quinta – in support of Short-Term Vacation Rentals (STVRs);  John Hastie, La Quinta – related to the recent “Regional Stay At Home Order” issued on December 3, 2020, and requesting no further restrictions be imposed on STVRs;  Janice Pratte, La Quinta – in opposition of STVRs; and  Michael Zieg, La Quinta – in support of STVRs. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 33 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 3 DECEMBER 9, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING City Clerk Radeva said Staff will continue to review emails and share any written public comments received and facilitate any requests for telephonic public comments through the adjournment of this meeting. PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY:  David Dinnel, La Quinta – said the airline industry is still operating; no financial stimulus is available to STVR owners during the COVID-19 pandemic; the recent “Regional Stay At Home Order,” is going to adversely affect STVR owners and the community; and requested that no further restrictions be imposed on STVRs. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA – Confirmed CLOSED SESSION 1. THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (a) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. CONSULTATION WITH: ALEXANDER JOHNSTON, SENIOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR; WILLIAM H. IHRKE, CITY ATTORNEY (Review Continued Need and Response to Proclaimed State and Local Emergencies Caused by COVID-19) COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 5:07 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:25 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihrke reported the following pursuant to Government Code Section 54950 et seq. (Brown Act) – the City Council discussed the threat to public services and closure of facilities caused by the threat of the spread of COVID-19, and took the following actions:  MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Peña to appropriate an additional $500,000 from the General Fund Economic Disaster Reserve fund balance to the General Fund Economic Development Fund to be used for the City’s Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Program, and directed the City Manager and Staff to bring proposals for implementing the distribution of this additional funding at the next regular Council meeting of December 15, 2020. Motion passed unanimously; and 34 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 3 DECEMBER 9, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Sanchez to appropriate $60,000 from the General Fund Economic Disaster Reserve fund balance to establish a Contribution to Other Agencies budget within the General Fund to be allocated to Find Food Bank to fund current food distribution programs for La Quinta residents. Motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA City Clerk Radeva said the following additional WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS, listed in alphabetical order, were received after 5:00 p.m., which were distributed to Council and incorporated into the agenda packet and public records of this meeting: Marie Thompson, La Quinta – requesting that the recent “Regional Stay At Home Order” be upheld; and Linda Van Pelt, La Quinta – in support of STVRs. MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS – None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Peña/Fitzpatrick to adjourn at 7:34 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 35 36 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTER DATED DECEMBER 4, 2020 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand register dated December 4, 2020. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City 2,052,059.27$ Successor Agency of RDA Housing Authority 17,300.03$ 2,069,359.30$ BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand register for December 4, 2020. Warrants Issued: 203392-203477 1,632,961.90$ EFT #109 300.00$ Void (245.00)$ Wire Transfers 200,152.64$ Payroll Tax Transfers 41,438.50$ Payroll Direct Deposit 194,751.26$ 2,069,359.30$ In the amounts listed above, check #203359 was voided and re-issued due to a vendor change of address. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 37 The most significant expenditures on the demand register are: Account Name Amount Urban Habitat Construction 606,144.93$ SilverRock Venue & Ocotillo Landscape ONYX Paving Construction 584,386.85$ OCT- Washington St. Company INC Pavement Rehab NAI Consulting INC Various 55,212.50$ OCT- Consulting Services Bunker Construction 37,665.60$ Fritz Burns Park Engineering & Sidewalk Parking Coachella Valley Water Various 37,407.71$ Water services District PurposeVendor Wire Transfers: Seven transfers totaled $200,153. Of this amount, $156,163 was for Landmark and $38,992 for PERS. (See Attachment 2 for a full listing). Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions as well as total holdings are reported quarterly in the Treasurer’s Report. Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Settle Date Coupon Rate Maturity First Bank Richmond CD 245,000$ 11/23/20 1.800% ALTERNATIVES Council may approve, partially approve, or reject the demand registers. Prepared by: Derrick Armendariz, Account Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Attachments:1. Demand Registers 2.Wire Transfers 38 12/4/2020 5:50:58 PM Page 1 of 8 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT02613 - JD 12/04/20 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND 300.00Travel & Training11/22/20 LEAGUE SEMENIAR-MRADEVA &…109RADEVA, MONIKA 101-1005-60320 2,688.62Professional Services10/2020 SECURITY SERVICE FOR STVR HO…203394ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY S…101-6004-60103 1,555.42Marketing & Tourism Promoti…11/2020 COVID-19 RADIO ADS KCLB-FM203395ALPHA MEDIA LLC 101-3007-60461 1,547.70Marketing & Tourism Promoti…11/2020 COVID-19 RADIO ADS KPSI-FM203395ALPHA MEDIA LLC 101-3007-60461 170.00Blood/Alcohol Testing10/31/20 BLOOD/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS203396AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES …101-2001-60174 1,000.00Administrative Citations11/25/20 CITATION LQ160904 REFUND203397ANNA DUITRUK OR ALFRED N…101-0000-42700 126.68PM 10 - Dust Control10/26-11/22/20 PM10 ANSWERING SVC203398ANSAFONE CONTACT CENTERS 101-7006-60146 4,000.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…12/2020 DESIGN PRODUCTION RETAINER203399ARK CONNECTS LLC 101-3007-60461 156.50Tools/Equipment11/19/20 BATTERY203401AUTOZONE 101-3005-60432 640.00Blood/Alcohol Testing11/16/20 BLOOD/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS203404BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 101-2001-60174 943.00Blood/Alcohol Testing11/16/20 BLOOD/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS203404BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 101-2001-60174 1,000.00Administrative Citations11/25/20 CITATION LQ160912 REFUND203405BRENDON AND MIRANDA KANE 101-0000-42700 300.00Community Experiences12/04/20 HOLIDAY CHARACTERS203407CARMONA, ITZELLE 101-3003-60149 375.00Travel & Training11/2020 CERTIFIED INSPECTOR TRAINING203410CISEC, INC.101-7006-60320 125.00Membership Dues12/20/20-12/21/21 ANN'L DUES203412CMRTA 101-6006-60351 4,741.65MSHCP Mitigation Fee09/2020 MSHCP FEES203414COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERV…101-0000-20310 -47.42CVMSHCP Admin Fee09/2020 MSHCP FEES203414COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERV…101-0000-43631 640.70Water - Utilities12/01/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-2002-61200 1,636.44Water -Monticello Park - Utiliti…12/01/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61201 4,414.15Water - Civic Center Park - Utili…12/01/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61202 7,881.45Water -Community Park - Utilit…12/01/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61209 167.47PM 10 - Dust Control12/01/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-7006-60146 169.25Water - Utilities11/18/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-2002-61200 112.46Water -Eisenhower Park - Utilit…11/18/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61203 123.99Water -Velasco Park - Utilities11/18/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61205 1,398.82Water -Desert Pride - Utilities11/18/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61206 2,942.13Water -Fritz Burns Park - Utiliti…12/01/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61204 660.49Water - Utilities12/01/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3008-61200 10,000.00Professional Services11/30/20 ADD'L DEP FOR LQ REGINAL SC…203417COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-7006-60103 454.01Maintenance/Services11/20/20 FS 32 MATERIALS203419CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DI…101-2002-60691 150.00Travel & Training01/2021 TRAINING-K.ROMERO203422CSMFO 101-1006-60320 21,500.00Auditors10/31/20 - 19/20 AUDIT/CAFR203426EIDE BAILLY LLP 101-1006-60106 38.91Postage11/23/20 OVERNIGHT MAIL203428FEDEX 101-1007-60470 252.37Maintenance/Services11/20/20 FS 93 ITEMS203429FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 101-2002-60691 37.66Telephone - Utilities10/28-11/27/20 SPORTS COMPLEX PHONE203431FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…101-3005-61300 1,998.11Electricity - Utilities12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-2002-61101 3,019.37Electric - Civic Center Park - Uti…12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61103 1,041.64Electric - Fritz Burns Park - Utili…12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61105 12.34Electric - Colonel Paige - Utiliti…12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61108 5,934.44Electric - Community Park - Util…12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61109 41.84Electric - Adams Park - Utilities12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61110 13.43Electric - Velasco Park - Utilities12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61111 22.53Electric - Eisenhower Park - Util…12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61113 10,046.15Electricity - Utilities12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3008-61101 200.00Instructors11/12/20 STRETCH & RESTORE203433JOHNSON, KAREN T. PAYNE 101-3002-60107 210.00Instructors11/12/20 SCULPT FIT CORE203433JOHNSON, KAREN T. PAYNE 101-3002-60107 250.00Administrative Citations11/05/20 OVERPAYMENT REFUND CITATI…203435MATHEW B. OR SARAH H. PECA 101-0000-42700 122.50Instructors11/12/20 TAI CHI CHUAN203436MEDEIROS, JOYCELEEN 101-3002-60107 300.00Lot Cleaning/Gravel Program11/23/20 WEED ABATEMENT203438MOYA, DANIEL 101-6004-60120 347.50Consultants10/2020 Ave La Fonda Fiber Conduit203439NAI CONSULTING INC 101-7006-60104 175.00Membership Dues01/31/21 NRPA MEMBERSHIP203440NATIONAL RECREATION & PA…101-3002-60351 77.37Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites06/2020 SATELLITE PHONES203441NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 101-2002-61304 77.37Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites08/2020 SATELLITE PHONES203441NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 101-2002-61304 ATTACHMENT 1 39 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02613 - JD 12/04/20 12/4/2020 5:50:58 PM Page 2 of 8 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 77.37Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites09/2020 SATELLITE PHONES203441NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 101-2002-61304 77.37Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites10/2020 SATELLITE PHONES203441NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 101-2002-61304 77.37Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites11/2020 SATELLITE PHONES203441NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 101-2002-61304 77.37Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites05/2020 SATELLITE PHONES203441NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 101-2002-61304 1,848.57Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance11/30/20 FB POOL PUMP MAINTENANCE203443OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 101-3005-60184 127.22Forms, Copier Paper11/18/20 CITY-WIDE COPY PAPER203444OFFICE DEPOT 101-1007-60402 4.56Office Supplies11/20/20 OFFICE SUPPLIES203444OFFICE DEPOT 101-1005-60400 100.70Office Supplies11/19/20 OFFICE SUPPLIES203444OFFICE DEPOT 101-1005-60400 14.58Postage09/28-10/01/20 OVERNIGHT MAIL203445ONTRAC 101-1007-60470 55.97Postage11/14/20 OVERNIGHT MAIL203445ONTRAC 101-1007-60470 360.98Maintenance/Services09/21/20 FS 93 GATE SVC & REPAIRS203447PATTON DOOR & GATE 101-2002-60691 65.00Maintenance/Services11/23/20 FS 93 REPAIRS203447PATTON DOOR & GATE 101-2002-60691 680.00Map/Plan Checking11/16/20 REVIEW LLA 2020-0015203449RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 875.00Map/Plan Checking11/17/20 REVIEW PARCEL MERGER 2020-…203449RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 173.85Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites11/23-12/22/20 SATELLITE PHONE203450ROADPOST USA INC.101-2002-61304 504.34Temporary Agency Services11/13/20 TEMP SVC-M.GONZALEZ203451ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 101-6006-60125 245.00Instructors11/12/20 ESSENTIAL FITNESS203452RUDY, LORI A 101-3002-60107 2,500.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…11/30/20 JAN/FEB/MARCH 21' ADS203455SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LIFE …101-3007-60461 140.62Operating Supplies11/3-11/18/20 DRINKING WATER203457SPARKLETTS 101-7003-60420 94.93Citywide Conf Room Supplies11/04-11/18/20 CITY-WIDE WATER203457SPARKLETTS 101-1007-60403 100.01Operating Supplies10/21/20 CERT OF ELECTION FRAMES203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-1005-60420 70.57Office Supplies10/21/20 SUPPLIES203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-3005-60400 36.96Operating Supplies10/21/20 CLOROX WIPES203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-7003-60420 36.93Disaster Prep Supplies11/14/20 CLOROX WIPES203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-2002-60406 424.02Forms, Copier Paper11/19/20 CITY-WIDE COPY PAPER203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-1007-60402 219.86Office Supplies11/20/20 PRINTER TONER203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-6004-60400 49.07Operating Supplies11/21/20 OPPERATING SUPPLIES203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-7003-60420 47.83Operating Supplies11/22/20 SUPPLIES203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-7003-60420 162.60Forms, Copier Paper11/28/20 PLOTTER TONER203458STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-1007-60402 1,000.00Administrative Citations11/25/20 CITATION LQ161003 REFUND203460TEN PROPERTIES 101-0000-42700 6,870.83Marketing & Tourism Promoti…12/2020 GEM ADVERTISING203462THE CHAMBER 101-3007-60461 15.29Gas - Utilities10/19-11/19/20 FS #32 GAS SVC203464THE GAS COMPANY 101-2002-61100 92.92Gas - Utilities10/19-11/19/20 C.H. GAS SVC203464THE GAS COMPANY 101-3008-61100 15.29Gas-Utilities FB Pool10/19-11/19/20 FB POOL GAS203464THE GAS COMPANY 101-3005-61100 127.04Gas - Utilities10/19-11/19/20 WC GAS SVC203464THE GAS COMPANY 101-3008-61100 703.34Operating Supplies11/19/20 POLICE/FIRE FALSE ALARM NOTI…203465THE PRINTING PLACE 101-2001-60420 50.23Materials/Supplies11/19/20 MATERIALS203466THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.101-3005-60431 48.69Materials/Supplies11/19/20 MATERIALS203466THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.101-3005-60431 53.28Operating Supplies11/30/20 MATERIALS203466THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.101-7003-60420 90.07Cable - Utilities11/16-12/15/20 FS #32 CABLE (8152)203467TIME WARNER CABLE 101-2002-61400 41.69Cable - Utilities11/16-12/15/20 FS #70 CABLE (1860)203467TIME WARNER CABLE 101-2002-61400 72.00United Way DeductionsCONTRIBUTION203469UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 101-0000-20981 10.60Materials/Supplies09/28/20 KEYS FOR CH203471VALLEY LOCK & SAFE 101-3008-60431 52.47Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites10/14-11/13/20 EOC CELL SVC (7813)203472VERIZON WIRELESS 101-2002-61304 2,320.00Materials/Supplies11/16/20 PLANT REPLACEMENT203473VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 101-3005-60431 3,400.00Maintenance/Services11/16/20 OVERSEEDING AT ADAMS PARK…203473VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 101-3005-60691 163.98Maintenance/Services11/17/20 FS 32 MATERIALS203474WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…101-2002-60691 14.91Maintenance/Services11/17/20 FS 32 MATERIALS203474WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…101-2002-60691 833.63Map/Plan Checking08/1-08/28/20 DUTCH BROS ON-CALL PW…203475WILLDAN 101-7002-60183 700.00Map/Plan Checking09/1-08/30/20 DESERT CLUB ON-CALL PW…203475WILLDAN 101-7002-60183 340.00Sheriff - Other11/10/20 POLICE TOWING LA203150090203476WOOD, RUSSELL DAVID 101-2001-60176 Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Total:122,356.95 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND 695.73Electricity - Utilities12//01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 201-7003-61101 439.59Safety Gear11/11/20 CHAIN SAW PROTECTIVE WRAP203437MOWERS PLUS INC 201-7003-60427 782.50Street Striping10/2020 ADAMS STREET RESTRIPPING203439NAI CONSULTING INC 201-7003-60141 103.91Safety Gear11/03/20 SAFETY GEAR203459SUMMIT SAFETY LLC 201-7003-60427 249.15Traffic Control Signs11/16/20 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS203468TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 271.66Traffic Control Signs11/16/20 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS203468TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 393.46Traffic Control Signs11/16/20 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS203468TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 40 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02613 - JD 12/04/20 12/4/2020 5:50:58 PM Page 3 of 8 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 686.76Traffic Control Signs11/16/20 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS203468TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 554.63Traffic Control Signs11/17/20 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS203468TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 122.34Traffic Control Signs11/18/20 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS203468TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 26.43Traffic Control Signs11/23/20 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS203468TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total:4,326.16 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 133.00Telephone - Utilities11/13-12/12/20 MUSUEM PHONE203431FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…202-3006-61300 2,886.02Electricity - Utilities12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 202-3004-61101 944.34Electricity - Utilities12/01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 202-3006-61101 31.75Gas - Utilities10/19-11/19/20 LIBRARY GAS SVC203464THE GAS COMPANY 202-3004-61100 366.97Maintenance/Services11/18/20 LIBRARY MATERIALS203474WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…202-3004-60691 -366.97Maintenance/Services11/10/20 LIBRARY MATERIAL CREDIT203474WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…202-3004-60691 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total:3,995.11 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 4,377.33Water - Medians - Utilities11/18/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 12,883.03Water - Medians - Utilities12/01/20 WATER SVC203416COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 100.65Electric - Utilities11/18/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61116 13.43Electric - Medians - Utilities11/18/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61117 3,299.65Electric - Utilities12//01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61116 1,958.12Electric - Medians - Utilities12//01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61117 671.21Tools/Equipment12/01/20 SMALL TOOLS203437MOWERS PLUS INC 215-7004-60432 2,552.00Maintenance/Services11/07/20 WIND STORM MAINT SVC203448PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 4,800.00Maintenance/Services11/28/20 TREE REMOVALS203448PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total:30,655.42 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 850.00AB 939 Recycling Solutions11/04/20 BENJAMIN FRAKLIN RECYCLING …203463THE ECOHERO SHOW LLC 221-0000-60127 Fund 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total:850.00 Fund: 224 - TUMF FUND 9,240.00TUMF Payable to CVAG07/2020 TUMF FEE203413COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC OF…224-0000-20320 9,800.62TUMF Payable to CVAG09/2020 TUMF FEE203413COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC OF…224-0000-20320 Fund 224 - TUMF FUND Total:19,040.62 Fund: 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) 7,335.46Tools/Equipment11/30/20 TRAILER FOR EMERGENCY RESP…203442NORCO TRAILERS 226-0000-60432 Fund 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) Total:7,335.46 Fund: 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 424.60Electricity - Utilities12//01/20 ELECTRICITY SVC203432IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 235-0000-61101 Fund 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND Total:424.60 Fund: 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 5,000.00Auditors10/31/20 - 19/20 AUDIT/CAFR203426EIDE BAILLY LLP 241-9101-60106 Fund 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY Total:5,000.00 Fund: 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple) 7,645.00Professional Services08/01-10/30/20 - HOUSING ON-CALL PLA…203461TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE…244-0000-60103 Fund 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple) Total:7,645.00 Fund: 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 3,290.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…SMALL BUS. ECON. RELIEF- AUG RENT/UTI…203400ASADERO LOS CORRALES 247-0000-60510 1,079.06Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…SMALL BUS. ECON. RELIEF- AUG RENT/UTI…203408CASITA STUDIOS 247-0000-60510 3,350.96Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…SMALL BUS. ECON. RELIEF- AUG RENT/UTI…203411CITY NAILS 2 247-0000-60510 2,353.18Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…SMALL BUS. ECON. RELIEF- AUG RENT/UTI…203415COACHELLA VALLEY CROSSFIT 247-0000-60510 1,490.80Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…SMALL BUS. ECON. RELIEF- AUG RENT/UTI…203424DION & FALLDORF COMPANY 247-0000-60510 3,649.41Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…SMALL BUS. ECON. RELIEF- AUG RENT/UTI…203434LQEWC INC 247-0000-60510 4,794.84Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…SMALL BUS. ECON. RELIEF- AUG RENT/UTI…203453SANDAA, INC DBA ALANKARA …247-0000-60510 3,075.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…SMALL BUS. ECON. RELIEF- AUG RENT/UTI…203477YOU GRILL KOREAN BBQ 247-0000-60510 Fund 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Total:23,083.25 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 6,750.00Art Purchases11/17/20 FY2021 APP MURAL 1 OF 2 PAY…203430FRIZZELL, NATHAN 270-0000-74800 245.00APP Maintenance11/20/20 VETS MEMORIAL PATINA WORK203454SIGNATURE SCULPTURE 270-0000-60683 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total:6,995.00 41 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02613 - JD 12/04/20 12/4/2020 5:50:58 PM Page 4 of 8 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 6,634.93Design10/2020 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE LOW WAT…203403BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 401-0000-60185 -1,982.40Retention Payable11/16/20 2017-22 FB PARK SIDEWALK & P…203406BUNKER ENGINEERING 401-0000-20600 39,648.00Construction11/16/20 2017-22 FB PARK SIDEWALK & P…203406BUNKER ENGINEERING 401-0000-60188 26,499.00Construction08/12/20 2016-03 CVWD CHARGES203418COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…401-0000-60188 9,887.98Construction08/12/20 2015-09 CVWD CHARGES203418COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…401-0000-60188 14,352.50Technical09/26-10/30/20 - 2014-13 ON-CALL MATE…203420CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 401-0000-60108 4,007.50Technical09/26-10/30/20 - 2016-08 ON-CALL MATE…203420CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 401-0000-60108 1,625.00Construction09/26-10/30/20 - 2020-04 ON-CALL MATE…203420CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 401-0000-60188 50.00Technical11/30/20 NOTICE EXEMPT FEE 2015-09203421COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 401-0000-60108 14,500.00Construction11/05/20 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT REPAIRS-…203423DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUC…401-0000-60188 9,785.95Technical09/26-10/30/20 PALEONTOLOGICAL MON…203425DUDEK & ASSOCIATES INC 401-0000-60108 7,270.00Professional Services10/2020 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE IMPROVE…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 2,015.00Professional Services10/2020 LA QUINTA X PARK203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 2,937.50Professional Services10/2020 MONROE STREET PAVEMENT RE…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 3,280.00Professional Services10/2020 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN …203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 465.00Professional Services10/2020 FRITZ BURNS PARK - SIDEWALK &…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 657.50Professional Services10/2020 WASHINGTON STREET PAVEMEN…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 3,817.50Professional Services10/2020 CITYWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY CAME…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 4,265.00Professional Services10/2020 LA QUINTA VILLAGE COMPLETE S…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 2,465.00Professional Services10/2020 FIRE STATION 70 REVITALIZATION203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 1,090.00Professional Services10/2020 HSIP TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCON…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 4,962.50Professional Services10/2020 HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 2,730.00Professional Services10/2020 EISENHOWER RETENTION BASIN …203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 4,867.50Professional Services10/2020 SILVERROCK RESORT INFRASTRU…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 225.00Professional Services10/2020 CITYWIDE MISC. ADA203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 3,655.00Professional Services10/2020 SILVERROCK EVENT SPACE203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 1,122.50Professional Services10/2020 LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVAT…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 4,877.50Professional Services10/2020 CITYWIDE MISC. ADA IMPROVEM…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 2,312.50Professional Services10/2020 WASHINGTON STREET AT FRED …203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 337.50Professional Services10/2020 DUNE PALMS ROAD STREET IMP…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 730.00Professional Services10/2020 AVE 50 BRIDGE SPANNING THE E…203439NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 -30,757.20Retention Payable09/2020-10/2020 - 2020-04 WASHINGTON…203446ONYX PAVING COMPANY INC.401-0000-20600 615,144.05Construction09/2020-10/2020 - 2020-04 WASHINGTON…203446ONYX PAVING COMPANY INC.401-0000-60188 16,987.85Construction10/2020 LQ VILLAGE COMPLETE STREETS …203456SOUTHSTAR ENGINEERING & …401-0000-60188 -25,992.37Retention Payable10/2020 - 2016-08 SILVERROCK PARK VE…203470URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-20600 519,847.30Construction10/2020 - 2016-08 SILVERROCK PARK VE…203470URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-60188 -5,910.00Retention Payable10/2020 LQ LANDSCAPE IMPR - RANCHO …203470URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-20600 118,200.00Construction10/2020 LQ LANDSCAPE IMPR - RANCHO …203470URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-60188 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total:1,386,610.59 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 2,345.38Vehicle Repair & Maintenance11/24/20 BUCKET TRUCK ANN'L SVC203392A & J TRUCK REPAIR 501-0000-60676 4,800.00City Bldg Repl/Repair11/30/20 C.H. CAMERA SYSTEM203402AVTECH 501-0000-71103 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total:7,145.38 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 138.20Machinery & Equipment11/18/20 (2) ROUTER SWITCHES203409CDW GOVERNMENT INC 502-0000-80100 5,800.00Software Licenses12/01-11/30/21 ESRI SERVICES203427ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RE…502-0000-60301 95.03Cable - Utilities10/25-11/24/20 C.H. INTERNET203431FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61400 86.86Cable - Utilities10/27-11/26/20 BLACKHAWK/LQ PARK DSL203431FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61400 100.91Cable - Utilities10/26-11/25/20 C.H. DSL203431FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61400 150.13Technical08/15-09/14/20 WC INTERNECT SVC (8105)203467TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-60108 150.13Technical09/15-10/14/20 WC INTERNECT SVC (8105)203467TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-60108 150.13Technical08/15-11/14/20 WC INTERNECT SVC (8105)203467TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-60108 82.14Cable - Utilities11/12-12/11/20 C.Y. CABLE (4080)203467TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-61400 8.83Cable - Utilities11/20-12/19/20 WC CABLE (1909)203467TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-61400 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total:6,762.36 42 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02613 - JD 12/04/20 12/4/2020 5:50:58 PM Page 5 of 8 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND 1,036.00Crime Insurance12/03-07/01/21 COMMERCIAL CRIME POL…203393ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES …504-1010-60446 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total:1,036.00 Grand Total:1,633,261.90 43 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02613 - JD 12/04/20 12/4/2020 5:50:58 PM Page 6 of 8 Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 101 - GENERAL FUND 122,356.95 201 - GAS TAX FUND 4,326.16 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 3,995.11 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 30,655.42 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 850.00 224 - TUMF FUND 19,040.62 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (…7,335.46 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 424.60 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 5,000.00 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple)7,645.00 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 23,083.25 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 6,995.00 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 1,386,610.59 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 7,145.38 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 6,762.36 504 - INSURANCE FUND 1,036.00 Grand Total:1,633,261.90 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-0000-20310 MSHCP Mitigation Fee 4,741.65 101-0000-20981 United Way Deductions 72.00 101-0000-42700 Administrative Citations 3,250.00 101-0000-43631 CVMSHCP Admin Fee -47.42 101-1005-60320 Travel & Training 300.00 101-1005-60400 Office Supplies 105.26 101-1005-60420 Operating Supplies 100.01 101-1006-60106 Auditors 21,500.00 101-1006-60320 Travel & Training 150.00 101-1007-60402 Forms, Copier Paper 713.84 101-1007-60403 Citywide Conf Room Suppl…94.93 101-1007-60470 Postage 109.46 101-2001-60174 Blood/Alcohol Testing 1,753.00 101-2001-60176 Sheriff - Other 340.00 101-2001-60420 Operating Supplies 703.34 101-2002-60406 Disaster Prep Supplies 36.93 101-2002-60691 Maintenance/Services 1,311.25 101-2002-61100 Gas - Utilities 15.29 101-2002-61101 Electricity - Utilities 1,998.11 101-2002-61200 Water - Utilities 809.95 101-2002-61304 Mobile/Cell Phones/Satell…690.54 101-2002-61400 Cable - Utilities 131.76 101-3002-60107 Instructors 777.50 101-3002-60351 Membership Dues 175.00 101-3003-60149 Community Experiences 300.00 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Maintena…1,848.57 101-3005-60400 Office Supplies 70.57 101-3005-60431 Materials/Supplies 2,418.92 101-3005-60432 Tools/Equipment 156.50 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 3,400.00 101-3005-61100 Gas-Utilities FB Pool 15.29 101-3005-61103 Electric - Civic Center Park…3,019.37 101-3005-61105 Electric - Fritz Burns Park -…1,041.64 101-3005-61108 Electric - Colonel Paige - U…12.34 101-3005-61109 Electric - Community Park …5,934.44 101-3005-61110 Electric - Adams Park - Util…41.84 101-3005-61111 Electric - Velasco Park - Uti…13.43 101-3005-61113 Electric - Eisenhower Park …22.53 101-3005-61201 Water -Monticello Park - …1,636.44 44 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02613 - JD 12/04/20 12/4/2020 5:50:58 PM Page 7 of 8 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3005-61202 Water - Civic Center Park -…4,414.15 101-3005-61203 Water -Eisenhower Park -…112.46 101-3005-61204 Water -Fritz Burns Park - …2,942.13 101-3005-61205 Water -Velasco Park - Utili…123.99 101-3005-61206 Water -Desert Pride - Utili…1,398.82 101-3005-61209 Water -Community Park -…7,881.45 101-3005-61300 Telephone - Utilities 37.66 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pro…16,473.95 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 10.60 101-3008-61100 Gas - Utilities 219.96 101-3008-61101 Electricity - Utilities 10,046.15 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 660.49 101-6004-60103 Professional Services 2,688.62 101-6004-60120 Lot Cleaning/Gravel Progr…300.00 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 219.86 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servic…504.34 101-6006-60351 Membership Dues 125.00 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 3,088.63 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 327.76 101-7006-60103 Professional Services 10,000.00 101-7006-60104 Consultants 347.50 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 294.15 101-7006-60320 Travel & Training 375.00 201-7003-60141 Street Striping 782.50 201-7003-60427 Safety Gear 543.50 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 2,304.43 201-7003-61101 Electricity - Utilities 695.73 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 0.00 202-3004-61100 Gas - Utilities 31.75 202-3004-61101 Electricity - Utilities 2,886.02 202-3006-61101 Electricity - Utilities 944.34 202-3006-61300 Telephone - Utilities 133.00 215-7004-60432 Tools/Equipment 671.21 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 7,352.00 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 3,400.30 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utiliti…1,971.55 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utilities 17,260.36 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutions 850.00 224-0000-20320 TUMF Payable to CVAG 19,040.62 226-0000-60432 Tools/Equipment 7,335.46 235-0000-61101 Electricity - Utilities 424.60 241-9101-60106 Auditors 5,000.00 244-0000-60103 Professional Services 7,645.00 247-0000-60510 Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Rel…23,083.25 270-0000-60683 APP Maintenance 245.00 270-0000-74800 Art Purchases 6,750.00 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable -64,641.97 401-0000-60103 Professional Services 54,082.50 401-0000-60108 Technical 28,195.95 401-0000-60185 Design 6,634.93 401-0000-60188 Construction 1,362,339.18 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Mainte…2,345.38 501-0000-71103 City Bldg Repl/Repair 4,800.00 502-0000-60108 Technical 450.39 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 5,800.00 502-0000-61400 Cable - Utilities 373.77 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 138.20 45 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02613 - JD 12/04/20 12/4/2020 5:50:58 PM Page 8 of 8 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 504-1010-60446 Crime Insurance 1,036.00 Grand Total:1,633,261.90 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense AmountProject Account Name Project Name **None**160,104.83**None****None** 091004P 337.50Professional Expense Dune Palms Road Street Improvements 111205D 6,634.93Design Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5433(014) 111205P 7,270.00Professional Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5433(014) 141513CT 14,500.00Construction Expense SilverRock Way Infra/Street Improvements 141513P 4,867.50Professional Expense SilverRock Way Infra/Street Improvements 141513T 24,138.45Technical Expense SilverRock Way Infra/Street Improvements 151603CT 16,987.85Construction Expense La Quinta Village Complete St-ATPSBIL-5433(020) 151603P 4,265.00Professional Expense La Quinta Village Complete St-ATPSBIL-5433(020) 151609CT 9,887.98Construction Expense La Quinta X Park 151609P 2,015.00Professional Expense La Quinta X Park 151609T 50.00Technical Expense La Quinta X Park 201602P 1,090.00Professional Expense HSIP Traffic Signal Interconnect/HSIPL-5433(017) 201603CT 144,699.00Construction Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement 201603P 1,122.50Professional Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement 201608CT 519,847.30Construction Expense SilverRock Event Space 201608P 3,655.00Professional Expense SilverRock Event Space 201608T 4,007.50Technical Expense SilverRock Event Space 201701P 2,312.50Professional Expense Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive 201704P 2,730.00Professional Expense Eisenhower Retention Basin Landscape Improvements 201722CT 39,648.00Construction Expense Fritz Burns Parks Sidewalk and Parking Lot Improve 201722P 465.00Professional Expense Fritz Burns Parks Sidewalk and Parking Lot Improve 201902P 730.00Professional Expense Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the Evacuation Channel 201905P 4,962.50Professional Expense Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 201907P 2,465.00Professional Expense Fire Station 70 Revitalization 201909P 225.00Professional Expense Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Improvements 201919E 10,000.00Regional Scour Analysis Expense Regional Scour Analysis 201924P 3,280.00Professional Expense 5 Year Pavement Management Update 202001P 2,937.50Professional Expense Monroe Street Pavement Rehab (Ave 52, Ave 53) 202002P 4,877.50Professional Expense Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Improvements 202003P 3,817.50Professional Expense Citywide Public Safety Camera System 202004CT 616,769.05Construction Expense Washington Street Pavement Rehabilitation 202004P 657.50Professional Expense Washington Street Pavement Rehabilitation 202006P 782.50Professional Expense Adams Street Restriping Project 202012LEAP 7,645.00202012 LEAP Funding Housing Element Update 2021 CORONANR 3,177.01Corona Non Reimbursable Corona Virus Emergency Response TREEE 300.00Tree Lighting Ceremony Expense Tree Lighting Ceremony Grand Total:1,633,261.90 46 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 11/21 – 12/04/2020 Wire Transaction Listed below are the wire transfers from 11/21 – 12/04/2020 Wire Transfers: 11/21/2020 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK 151,162.62$ 11/21/2020 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK 5,000.00$ 11/27/2020 - WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 4,575.29$ 11/27/2020 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 423.00$ 11/27/2020 - WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 18,715.31$ 11/27/2020 - WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 14,790.00$ 11/27/2020 - WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 5,486.42$ TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT 200,152.64$ ATTACHMENT 2 47 48 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FIRST QUARTER 2020-21 TREASURY REPORTS FOR JULY, AUGUST, AND SEPTEMBER 2020 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the first quarter fiscal year 2020-21 Treasury Reports for July, August and September 2020. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Commentary and Summary of Significant Activity The total book value of the portfolio decreased $15.96 million, from $169.99 million at the end of June to $154.03 million at the end of September. A decrease of $13.30 million was due to payment of debt service obligations in August (funding of which came from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) pass-through apportionment payment in June). The remainder of the decrease reflects operational activity throughout the quarter. The portfolio is within policy limits for investment types and total allocation by type (see chart below), and is also within policy guidelines for investment ratings. Investment Type July August September Max Allowed Bank Accounts 1.38% 2.42% 4.71% 100% Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) City 42.71% 33.40% 35.15% (1) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Housing 9.98% 9.91% 10.72% (1)(2) Money Market 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 20% Money Market Pool Accounts-CAMP 1.72% 1.71% 1.85% 20% Federal Agency Coupons 8.47% 9.61% 9.75% 100% Treasury Coupons 6.59% 5.95% 6.43% 100% Certificates of Deposit (CD's)20.36% 20.22% 21.87% 30% Corporate Notes 1.42% 1.41% 1.52% 30% Money Market with Fiscal Agent 0.00% 7.98% 0.00% (2) CERBT- OPEB Trust 1.04% 1.03% 1.16% (3) PARS Pension Trust 6.34% 6.37% 6.82% (3) Total 100% 100% 100% (3) OPEB and pension trusts are fiduciary accounts and not subject to City Investment Policy (1) LAIF is subject to maximum dollar amount not a percentage of the portfolio (2) Funds held by fiscal agent and the LAIF Housing funds are governed by bond indentures and not subject to City Investment Policy Portfolio Allocations CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 49 The market continued to react to the political climate, economic news, and ongoing concerns around the worldwide Coronavirus pandemic; staff works continually with the City’s brokers to stay abreast of market conditions. The fiscal year annual effective rate of return is 1.13% as of September, a 69 basis point (bps) decrease since June (Q4). Throughout the quarter, two CDs, one agency bond, and one treasury matured, this money was reinvested in the purchase of three new agency bonds. Maturities and purchases are listed in detail in the attached reports. Other Notes Money market funds with the fiscal agent are bond proceeds subject to bond indentures, not the City’s investment policy. Successor Agency (SA) funds cannot be invested long-term; therefore SA funds are only invested in LAIF. Looking Ahead The Treasurer follows a “buy and hold” Investment Policy, unless it is fiscally advantageous to actively trade outside of maturity dates. In the short term, the Treasurer will invest in CAMP and LAIF as needed. Longer term investments may include Government Sponsored Enterprise (agencies) securities, U.S. Treasuries, Corporate Notes, and Negotiable Certificates of Deposits. All investments recognize both immediate and long-term cash flow needs, and there is sufficient liquidity in the portfolio to meet expenditure requirements for the next six months. ALTERNATIVES - None Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Approved by: Karla Romero, Finance Director/City Treasurer Attachment: 1. Treasurer’s Reports for July 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020 Total Earnings Average Days to Maturity Effective Rate of Return YTD July 156,748$ 356 1.09% August 164,529$ 364 1.16% September 144,505$ 382 1.13% Quarter 1 465,782$ 367 1.13% 50 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management July 31, 2020 City of La Quinta - Portfolio Summary % of Portfolio Book ValueInvestmentsMarket Value Par Value Days to MaturityTerm YTM 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 2,277,417.07 11.38 0.00012,277,417.072,277,417.07 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 70,644,117.99 142.71 0.920170,980,465.1970,644,117.99 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 16,510,033.50 19.98 0.920116,592,317.5116,510,033.50 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 2,851,608.51 11.72 0.37012,851,608.512,851,608.51 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 14,011,942.36 1,5288.47 1.4621,19514,453,527.0014,050,000.00 Treasury Coupon Securities 10,897,535.00 1,5886.59 1.55751111,188,425.0011,000,000.00 Certificate of Deposits 33,684,000.00 1,55020.36 2.1631,03335,305,399.2133,684,000.00 Corporate Notes 2,341,260.00 1,4361.42 2.7257442,488,205.002,400,000.00 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 5,360.92 10.00 0.00015,360.925,360.92 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1,714,840.82 11.04 0.00011,714,840.821,714,840.82 PARS Pension Trust 10,481,313.32 16.34 0.000110,481,313.3210,481,313.32 165,419,429.49 100.00%Investments 168,338,879.55165,618,692.13 571 356 1.196 Current Year July 31 156,748.32 Fiscal Year To Date 156,748.32 Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 169,640,682.82 169,640,682.82 1.09%1.09% Total Earnings Month Ending I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. __________________________________________________ ____________________ Karla Romero, Finance Director Portfolio CITY CP Reporting period 07/01/2020-07/31/2020 Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 11:49 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 December 8, 2020 ATTACHMENT 1 51 Days toMaturityPage 1Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueJuly 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateBank Accounts1Bank of the West12281,671,857.56 1,671,857.5608/20/2019 1,671,857.56 10597318510.0001City Petty Cash10593,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS10590.0001La Quinta Palms Realty1062223,898.00 223,898.0007/01/2016 223,898.00 1SYS10620.0001Stifel, Nicolaus & Company11830.00 0.0003/18/2019 0.00 1SYS11830.0001Wells Fargo1057378,361.51 378,361.5107/01/2016 378,361.51 141592824820.0002,277,417.0712,277,417.072,277,417.078,422,484.32Subtotal and Average10.000Local Agency Investment Fund-City1Local Agency Inv Fund105570,644,117.99 70,644,117.99 0.92070,980,465.19 198-33-4340.92070,644,117.99170,980,465.1970,644,117.9968,756,102.66Subtotal and Average10.920Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing1Local Agency Inv Fund111316,510,033.50 16,510,033.50 0.92016,592,317.51 125-33-0050.92016,510,033.50116,592,317.5116,510,033.5016,559,853.20Subtotal and Average10.920Money Market Accounts - CAMP1California Asset Management Pr11532,851,608.51 2,851,608.51 0.37009/26/2018 2,851,608.51 1SYS11530.3702,851,608.5112,851,608.512,851,608.512,850,740.91Subtotal and Average10.370Federal Agency Coupon Securities41Federal Home Loan Bank11041,000,000.00 996,800.00 09/11/20201.62511/09/2017 1,001,560.00 1,0373130A66T91.741396Federal Farm Credit Bank11051,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 1,016,620.00 1,3923133EHWM11.913766Federal National Mtg Assn12331,000,000.00 992,100.00 09/06/20221.37510/29/2019 1,025,250.00 1,0433135G0W331.659789Federal Farm Credit Bank12471,000,000.00 999,217.36 09/29/20221.40002/05/2020 1,025,630.00 9673133EGWJ01.430863Federal Farm Credit Bank1198500,000.00 499,500.00 12/12/20221.87506/20/2019 519,645.00 1,2713133EKQP41.9051,108Federal Farm Credit Bank1223500,000.00 499,400.00 08/14/20231.60009/12/2019 520,130.00 1,4323133EKZK51.6321,130Federal Farm Credit Bank1158250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 269,440.00 1,7863133EJYL73.0411,187Federal Farm Credit Bank12341,000,000.00 996,900.00 11/01/20231.60011/01/2019 1,042,970.00 1,4613133EK4X11.6801,291Federal Home Loan Bank1177500,000.00 498,550.00 02/13/20242.50003/01/2019 539,620.00 1,8103130AFW942.5631,292Federal Farm Credit Bank12461,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/14/20241.43002/14/2020 1,041,740.00 1,4613133ELNE01.4561,431Federal National Mtg Assn1206500,000.00 495,950.00 07/02/20241.75007/15/2019 528,840.00 1,8143135G0V751.9221,455Federal Farm Credit Bank1212500,000.00 499,500.00 07/26/20241.85008/02/2019 530,765.00 1,8203133EKWV41.8711,508Federal Farm Credit Bank1224500,000.00 498,750.00 09/17/20241.60009/17/2019526,390.001,8273133EKP751.6521,508Federal Farm Credit Bank12421,000,000.00998,600.0009/17/20241.70012/17/20191,056,880.001,7363133ELEA81.7311,724Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp12751,000,000.00998,500.0004/21/20250.70004/28/20201,000,830.001,8193134GVLC00.7311,760Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp12791,000,000.001,000,000.0005/27/20250.62505/27/20201,002,240.001,8263134GVYG70.625Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 11:49PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0Report Ver. 7.3.6.152 Days toMaturityPage 2Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueJuly 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateFederal Agency Coupon Securities1,773Federal Farm Credit Bank1280500,000.00 499,850.00 06/09/20250.50006/09/2020 501,825.00 1,8263133ELH230.5061,774Federal Farm Credit Bank1282500,000.00 500,000.00 06/10/20250.68006/10/2020 500,805.00 1,8263133ELH800.6801,777Federal Home Loan Bank1281500,000.00 499,850.00 06/13/20250.50006/03/2020 502,290.00 1,8363130AJKW80.5061,794Federal Home Loan Bank1283300,000.00 300,000.00 06/30/20250.68006/30/2020 300,057.00 1,8263130AJRP60.68014,011,942.361,52814,453,527.0014,050,000.0014,011,942.36Subtotal and Average1,195 1.462Treasury Coupon Securities14U.S. Treasury11171,000,000.00 985,800.00 08/15/20201.50001/22/2018 1,000,460.00 9369128282Q22.071303U.S. Treasury1193500,000.00 493,610.00 05/31/20211.37505/31/2019 505,155.00 731912828R772.030333U.S. Treasury10455,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 5,045,100.00 1,808912828S271.125456U.S. Treasury10702,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 2,027,820.00 1,679912828T671.903652U.S. Treasury1192500,000.00 496,650.00 05/15/20221.75005/31/2019 514,415.00 1,080912828SV31.984790U.S. Treasury1178500,000.00 489,687.50 09/30/20221.87503/01/2019 518,985.00 1,3099128282W92.4801,155U.S. Treasury1217500,000.00 499,300.00 09/30/20231.37508/21/2019 519,690.00 1,501912828T261.4101,582U.S. Treasury12411,000,000.00 989,687.50 11/30/20241.50012/16/2019 1,056,800.00 1,811912828YV61.71810,897,535.001,58811,188,425.0011,000,000.0010,897,535.00Subtotal and Average511 1.557Certificate of Deposits79First Tech Federal Credit Unio1124245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20202.70004/18/2018 246,406.30 91533715LBJ82.623114First Bank Richmond1081245,000.00 245,000.00 11/23/20201.80006/21/2017 246,337.70 1,251319267GC81.802143Freedom Credit Union1111245,000.00 245,000.00 12/22/20202.05012/22/2017 246,915.90 1,09635638BAA92.052166Bankers Bank1086240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 241,860.00 1,28006610RAP41.804170Farm Bureau Bank1165248,000.00 248,000.00 01/18/20213.00012/17/2018 251,357.92 763307660LC22.898172Eagle Bank1146245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 248,182.55 91527002YDV52.858184Infinty FCU1211248,000.00 248,000.00 02/01/20212.10007/31/2019 250,492.40 55145667EDY12.110205Comenity Capital Bank1009240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 242,145.60 1,82720033APG51.702219Ally Bank Midvale1176245,000.00 245,000.00 03/08/20212.50003/07/2019 248,562.30 73202007GHX42.016227Unity Bank1120245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 248,750.95 1,09691330ABN62.552261Amex Centurion1077240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 243,691.20 1,46102587DP852.252272Towne Bank1128240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 244,838.40 1,09689214PBL22.803298PrivateBank & Trust1032240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016242,935.201,82674267GVG91.501310Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082240,000.00240,000.0006/07/20212.25006/07/2017244,375.201,46114042RGD72.252347Central State Bank1085240,000.00240,000.0007/14/20211.85007/14/2017243,948.001,46115523RBJ41.851380General Electric Credit Union1150240,000.00240,000.0008/16/20213.10008/15/2018247,437.601,097369674AV83.100422New York Community Bank1226245,000.00245,000.0009/27/20211.80009/27/2019249,728.50731649447TC31.802451Northpointe Bank1127240,000.00240,000.0010/26/20212.70004/26/2018247,605.601,279666613GV02.703Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 11:49PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.053 Days toMaturityPage 3Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueJuly 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits473First Source Bank1168245,000.00 245,000.00 11/17/20213.15012/17/2018 254,648.10 1,06633646CKP83.153478Belmont Savings Bank1102245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 251,279.35 1,462080515CD92.101478TNB Bank1187248,000.00 248,000.00 11/22/20212.40005/22/2019 255,330.88 91587266AAA12.407507Neighbors FCU1167245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20213.20012/21/2018 255,437.00 1,09664017AAQ73.203508United Credit Union1214248,000.00 248,000.00 12/22/20212.00008/22/2019 254,400.88 853910160AH32.003536The Ohio Valley Bank1089240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017 246,163.20 1,645677721CN01.903548Third Federal Savings and Loan1112245,000.00 245,000.00 01/31/20222.50001/30/2018 253,680.35 1,46288413QBY32.502549Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066240,000.00 240,000.00 02/01/20222.25002/01/2017 247,555.20 1,8262546722U12.251572BMW Bank1067240,000.00 240,000.00 02/24/20222.20002/24/2017 247,677.60 1,82605580AGK42.201576Maine Savings FCU1171248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20223.30012/28/2018 260,290.88 1,158560507AK13.306594Luana Savings Bank1225245,000.00 245,000.00 03/18/20221.60009/18/2019 250,772.20 912549104JN81.599606Bellco Credit Union1264248,000.00 248,000.00 03/30/20221.30003/31/2020 252,704.56 72907833EAD91.300607Cadence Bank, NA1259245,000.00 245,000.00 03/31/20221.20003/31/2020249,265.4573012738RFX71.200607Bank of Santa Clarita1261248,000.00248,000.0003/31/20221.10003/31/2020251,891.1273006424KBC31.100633Goldman Sachs1078240,000.00240,000.0004/26/20222.40004/26/2017249,336.001,82638148PJK42.401636Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126240,000.00240,000.0004/29/20222.80004/30/2018251,061.601,46030960QAG22.802654Kansas State Bank1101245,000.00245,000.0005/17/20222.10011/17/2017253,508.851,64250116CBE82.099670Synchrony Bank Retail1080240,000.00240,000.0006/02/20222.40006/02/2017249,866.401,82687164XQV12.401676PCSB Bank1149245,000.00245,000.0006/08/20223.00006/08/2018257,855.151,46169324MAD73.002677Synovus Bank1253245,000.00245,000.0006/09/20221.60003/09/2020251,539.0582287164DRD41.602681Allegiance Bank1143245,000.00245,000.0006/13/20223.10006/13/2018258,440.701,46101748DBE53.102689Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083240,000.00240,000.0006/21/20222.35006/21/2017249,909.601,826795450A702.351696America's Credit Union1200248,000.00248,000.0006/28/20222.30006/28/2019258,078.721,09603065AAL72.302737Traditions Bank1148245,000.00245,000.0008/08/20223.00006/08/2018258,969.901,52289269CBX93.002752CIT Bank NA1219245,000.00245,000.0008/23/20221.90008/23/2019253,692.601,09612556LBA31.902758American Express Fed Savings B1096240,000.00240,000.0008/29/20222.40008/29/2017250,358.401,82602587CFU92.402758Sterling Bank1201245,000.00245,000.0008/29/20222.15006/28/2019255,069.501,15885916VDC62.153803Alliance Credit Union1095245,000.00245,000.0010/13/20222.25010/13/2017256,137.701,82601859BAA32.251815Barclays Bank1097240,000.00240,000.0010/25/20222.30010/25/2017251,332.801,82606740KLJ42.291818Merrick Bank1163248,000.00248,000.0010/28/20223.25010/30/2018265,040.081,45959013J4K23.252829Mountain America Federal CU1099245,000.00245,000.0011/08/20222.30011/08/2017256,735.501,82662384RAC02.301839CrossFirst Bank1106245,000.00245,000.0011/18/20222.20011/20/2017256,323.901,82422766ACB92.201849Enterprise Bank, NA1107245,000.00245,000.0011/28/20222.15011/28/2017256,154.851,82629367QCP12.151858Medallion Bank1169248,000.00248,000.0012/07/20223.40012/07/2018266,681.841,46158404DCX73.402858Red Rocks Credit Union1166248,000.00248,000.0012/07/20223.35012/07/2018266,389.201,46175701LAB33.352880Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110245,000.00245,000.0012/29/20222.40012/29/2017258,016.851,826499724AB82.401Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 11:49PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.054 Days toMaturityPage 4Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueJuly 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits881Kern FCU1239248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.90012/30/2019 258,200.24 1,09649228XAK61.902881San Francisco FCU1240248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.85012/30/2019 248,293.38 1,09679772FAC01.852912Wells Fargo Natl Bank West1244248,000.00 248,000.00 01/30/20231.90001/29/2020 258,537.52 1,097949495AT21.900934Servisfirst Bank1254248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20231.60002/21/2020 256,853.60 1,09681768PAF31.601941Verus Bank of Commerce1180248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20232.70002/28/2019 263,926.56 1,46192535LCD42.700963Aneca Federal Credit Union1119245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018 261,777.60 1,826034577AH92.802972Northstar Bank1263248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 254,232.24 1,09566704MEQ01.150972West Michigan Cmnty Bk1265248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 254,232.24 1,095954444BS31.150983Citibank NA1123245,000.00 245,000.00 04/11/20232.90004/11/2018 262,752.70 1,82617312QJ262.9021,000Congressional Bank1189248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20232.50004/30/2019 263,559.52 1,45920726ABA52.5021,000EnerBank USA1125240,000.00 240,000.00 04/28/20232.95004/30/2018 258,014.40 1,82429278TAY62.9521,007First National Bank1179248,000.00 248,000.00 05/05/20232.80003/05/2019 265,697.28 1,52232117BCX42.8021,017University of Iowa Comm. CU1134240,000.00 240,000.00 05/15/20233.05005/14/2018258,957.601,82791435LAG23.0521,040Pittsfield Cooperative Bank1194245,000.00245,000.0006/07/20232.50006/07/2019260,944.601,461725404AB32.5021,053Morton Community1173248,000.00248,000.0006/20/20232.75003/20/2019266,091.601,553619165JD62.7531,053RCB Bank1144245,000.00245,000.0006/20/20233.15006/20/2018265,695.151,82674934YAH43.1521,059American First CU1285248,000.00248,000.0006/26/20230.35006/26/2020248,952.321,09502616AAH20.3501,082American National Bank1205248,000.00248,000.0007/19/20232.00007/19/2019261,062.161,46102772JBD12.0011,083First National Bank of America1147245,000.00245,000.0007/20/20233.15007/20/2018266,261.101,82632110YLK93.1521,094Bank of New England1151249,000.00249,000.0007/31/20233.25007/31/2018271,561.891,82606426KAN83.2521,117Raymond James Bank1218244,000.00244,000.0008/23/20231.95008/23/2019256,812.441,46175472RAD31.9511,154Triad Bank1262248,000.00248,000.0009/29/20231.35003/30/2020256,680.001,27889579NCD31.3521,172Marlin Business Bank1155248,000.00248,000.0010/17/20233.30010/17/2018272,242.001,82657116ARV23.3021,172Municipal Trust and Savings1160245,000.00245,000.0010/17/20233.20010/17/2018268,164.751,826625925AR33.2021,172UBS Bank USA1161245,000.00245,000.0010/17/20233.35010/17/2018269,340.751,82690348JEJ53.3521,174Jefferson Financial CU1154245,000.00245,000.0010/19/20233.35010/19/2018269,384.851,826474067AQ83.3521,201Commercial Bank1162248,000.00248,000.0011/15/20233.40011/15/2018273,561.361,82620143PDV93.4021,214Numerica Credit Union1164248,000.00248,000.0011/28/20233.55011/28/2018275,039.441,82667054NAN33.5521,237National Cooperative Bank, N.A1170245,000.00245,000.0012/21/20233.40012/21/2018270,947.951,826635573AL23.4021,245Bar Harbor Bank and Trust1172248,000.00248,000.0012/29/20233.35012/31/2018273,985.441,824066851WJ13.3521,276Lakeside Bank1208248,000.00248,000.0001/29/20242.00007/30/2019262,857.681,64451210SQU42.0031,290Rollstone B&T1251245,000.00245,000.0002/12/20241.65002/12/2020256,769.801,46177579ADF01.6511,291Northwest Bank1181248,000.00248,000.0002/13/20242.95002/13/2019271,269.841,82666736ABP32.9511,305Wells Fargo1174248,000.00248,000.0002/27/20243.00002/27/2019270,590.321,826949763XY73.0011,335Texas Bank Financial1260245,000.00245,000.0003/28/20241.10003/31/2020252,180.951,458882213AB71.1011,353The Jefferson Bank1272248,000.00248,000.0004/15/20241.25004/15/2020256,670.081,461472382AQ31.251Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 11:49PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.055 Days toMaturityPage 5Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueJuly 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits1,354Belmont Bank and Trust1270248,000.00 248,000.00 04/16/20241.25004/16/2020 256,672.56 1,46108016PDQ91.2511,354Pacific Western Bank1269245,000.00 245,000.00 04/16/20241.30004/16/2020 254,020.90 1,46169506YRH41.3011,364Main Street Bank1188248,000.00 248,000.00 04/26/20242.60004/26/2019 269,154.40 1,82756065GAG32.6031,383First Service Bank1231248,000.00 248,000.00 05/15/20241.70011/15/2019 260,980.32 1,64333640VDD71.7011,384JP Morgan Chase1185245,000.00 245,000.00 05/16/20243.25005/16/2019 239,512.00 1,82748128HXU73.2541,391Iowa State Bank1186245,000.00 245,000.00 05/23/20242.40005/23/2019 264,391.75 1,82746256YAZ22.4031,396Live Oak Bank1238248,000.00 248,000.00 05/28/20241.80011/27/2019 262,007.04 1,644538036GV01.8021,397Century Next Bank1184248,000.00 248,000.00 05/29/20242.50005/29/2019 268,623.68 1,827156634AK32.5031,406Plains Commerce Bank1195245,000.00 245,000.00 06/07/20242.55006/07/2019 265,949.95 1,82772651LCL62.5531,411Evansville Teachers Credit FCU1196248,000.00 248,000.00 06/12/20242.60006/12/2019 269,727.28 1,827299547AQ22.6031,418Legacy Bank1197248,000.00 248,000.00 06/19/20242.40006/19/2019 267,899.52 1,827524661CB92.4031,420Citizens State Bank1199248,000.00 248,000.00 06/21/20242.40006/21/2019 267,921.84 1,827176688CP22.4031,427Communitywide FCU1202248,000.00 248,000.00 06/28/20242.25006/28/2019266,552.881,82720416TAQ52.2531,427Revere Bank1203247,000.00247,000.0006/28/20242.30006/28/2019265,972.071,827761402BY12.3031,455Abacus Federal Savings1207248,000.00248,000.0007/26/20241.95007/26/2019263,884.401,82700257TBD71.9521,459First Security Bank of WA1209248,000.00248,000.0007/30/20242.00007/30/2019264,407.681,82733625CCP22.0021,460People's Bank1210248,000.00248,000.0007/31/20242.00007/31/2019264,415.121,827710571DS62.0021,476Preferred Bank1213249,000.00249,000.0008/16/20242.00008/16/2019265,556.011,827740367HP52.0021,483FirsTier Bank1216249,000.00249,000.0008/23/20241.95008/23/2019265,090.381,82733766LAJ71.9521,483Washington Federal1215248,000.00248,000.0008/23/20242.00008/23/2019264,524.241,827938828BH22.0021,490First State Bk DeQueen1222248,000.00248,000.0008/30/20241.80008/30/2019262,560.081,827336460CX61.8021,490First Natl Bk of Syracuse1221249,000.00249,000.0008/30/20241.85008/30/2019264,124.261,827334342CD21.8521,490Celtic Bank1220248,000.00248,000.0008/30/20241.85008/30/2019263,063.521,82715118RRH21.8521,518BankWest Inc1227248,000.00248,000.0009/27/20241.70009/27/2019261,617.681,82706652CHB01.7021,546Southern Bancorp Bk1286248,000.00248,000.0010/25/20240.50006/26/2020249,192.881,58284223QAN70.5001,559Sauk Valley B&T Co1235248,000.00248,000.0011/07/20241.70011/07/2019261,719.361,827804375DL41.7021,572Morgan Stanley Bank1237245,000.00245,000.0011/20/20241.95011/20/2019261,206.751,82761690UNX41.9521,572Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1236245,000.00245,000.0011/20/20241.90011/20/2019260,682.451,82761760A3B31.9021,612Bank Princeton1287248,000.00248,000.0012/30/20240.50006/30/2020248,820.881,644064520BG30.5001,651United Community1249248,000.00248,000.0002/07/20251.65002/07/2020261,342.401,82790983WBT71.6521,658First National Bank Michigan1250248,000.00248,000.0002/14/20251.65002/14/2020261,352.321,82732114VBT31.6521,658Freedom Financial1248248,000.00248,000.0002/14/20251.55002/14/2020260,238.801,82735637RDC81.5521,665American State1255248,000.00248,000.0002/21/20251.60002/21/2020260,804.241,827029728BC51.6021,671Citadel FCU1252248,000.00248,000.0002/27/20251.65002/27/2020261,369.681,82717286TAG01.6521,685Access Bank1256248,000.00248,000.0003/13/20251.60003/13/2020260,831.521,82600435JBH51.6011,692Spring Bank1257248,000.00248,000.0003/20/20251.50003/20/2020259,700.641,826849430BF91.501Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 11:49PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.056 Days toMaturityPage 6Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueJuly 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits1,698Axos Bank1258248,000.00 248,000.00 03/26/20251.65003/26/2020 261,411.84 1,82605465DAE81.6511,700Alma Bank1267248,000.00 248,000.00 03/28/20251.40003/30/2020 258,552.40 1,824020080BX41.3991,703Commonwealth Business Bk1268248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.25003/31/2020 256,838.72 1,8262027506M21.2511,703Nicolet Natl Bank1266248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.40003/31/2020 258,554.88 1,826654062JZ21.4011,711Capital One USA FDIC339541271245,000.00 245,000.00 04/08/20251.60004/08/2020 257,681.20 1,82614042TDD61.6011,731Firrst Natl Bk McGregor1274248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20251.35004/28/2020 257,944.80 1,82632112UDR91.3511,732First Freedom Bank1273249,000.00 249,000.00 04/29/20251.20004/29/2020 257,231.94 1,82632027BAL11.2011,733Flagstar1276248,000.00 248,000.00 04/30/20251.25004/30/2020 256,774.24 1,82633847E3A31.2511,7451st Internet Bank1278248,000.00 248,000.00 05/12/20251.00005/11/2020 253,825.52 1,82732056GDJ60.9851,746Western State Bank1277245,000.00 245,000.00 05/13/20251.00005/13/2020 250,752.60 1,82695960NKD81.0011,788Chippewa Valley Bk1284248,000.00 248,000.00 06/24/20250.60006/24/2020 250,670.96 1,826169894AS10.60033,684,000.001,55035,305,399.2133,684,000.0033,823,354.84Subtotal and Average1,033 2.163Corporate Notes368Apple Inc1079500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 505,810.00 1,514037833CC21.900554Proctor and Gamble1159500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 515,985.00 1,210742718DY23.071866Wal-Mart Stores, Inc1190500,000.00 496,650.00 12/15/20222.35004/16/2019 523,940.00 1,339931142DU42.799914Colgate-Palmolive1175500,000.00 485,250.00 02/01/20231.95003/04/2019 522,890.00 1,43019416QEA42.7511,102Microsoft Corporation1157400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 419,580.00 1,758594918BQ63.2222,341,260.001,4362,488,205.002,400,000.002,341,260.00Subtotal and Average744 2.725Money Market with Fiscal Agent1US Bank10585,360.92 5,360.9207/01/2016 5,360.92 1SYS10580.0005,360.9215,360.925,360.925,360.90Subtotal and Average10.000CERBT - OPEB Trust1CalPERS CERBT Plan11141,714,840.82 1,714,840.8207/01/2020 1,714,840.82 1SYS11140.0001,714,840.8211,714,840.821,714,840.821,714,840.82Subtotal and Average10.000PARS Pension Trust1Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Serv123010,481,313.32 10,481,313.3207/01/2020 10,481,313.32 1SYS12300.00010,481,313.32110,481,313.3210,481,313.3210,257,207.82Subtotal and Average10.000Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 11:49PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.057 Days toMaturityPage 7Par ValueBook ValueStatedRateMarket ValueJuly 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDate571169,640,682.82 165,618,692.13356 1.196168,338,879.55 165,419,429.49Total and AveragePortfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 11:49PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.058 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund July 1, 2020 - July 31, 2020 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 992,100.0012331,000,000.00 1.375FNMA 1,145.83 0.00 1,145.831.360101992,100.003135G0W33 0.00 495,950.001206500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.17 0.00 729.171.731101495,950.003135G0V75 0.00 1,000,000.0012791,000,000.00 0.625FHLMC 520.83 0.00 520.830.6131011,000,000.003134GVYG7 0.00 998,500.0012751,000,000.00 0.700FHLMC 583.33 0.00 583.330.688101998,500.003134GVLC0 0.00 996,900.0012341,000,000.00 1.600FFCB 1,333.33 0.00 1,333.331.575101996,900.003133EK4X1 0.00 499,500.001198500,000.00 1.875FFCB 781.25 0.00 781.251.842101499,500.003133EKQP4 0.00 498,750.001224500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.67 0.00 666.671.574101498,750.003133EKP75 0.00 998,600.0012421,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.670101998,600.003133ELEA8 0.00 499,400.001223500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.67 0.00 666.671.572101499,400.003133EKZK5 0.00 999,000.0012461,000,000.00 1.430FFCB 1,191.67 0.00 1,191.671.404101999,000.003133ELNE0 0.00 999,217.3612471,000,000.00 1.400FFCB 1,166.66 0.00 1,166.661.375101999,217.363133EGWJ0 0.00 499,850.001280500,000.00 0.500FFCB 208.33 0.00 208.330.491101499,850.003133ELH23 0.00 500,000.001282500,000.00 0.680FFCB 283.34 0.00 283.340.667101500,000.003133ELH80 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.66 0.00 1,416.661.681101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 499,500.001212500,000.00 1.850FFCB 770.83 0.00 770.831.817101499,500.003133EKWV4 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 583.33 0.00 583.332.778101247,275.003133EJYL7 0.00 300,000.001283300,000.00 0.680FHLB 170.00 0.00 170.000.667101300,000.003130AJRP6 0.00 499,850.001281500,000.00 0.500FHLB 208.33 0.00 208.330.491101499,850.003130AJKW8 0.00 498,550.001177500,000.00 2.500FHLB 1,041.66 0.00 1,041.662.460101498,550.003130AFW94 0.00 996,800.0011041,000,000.00 1.625FHLB 1,354.16 0.00 1,354.161.600101996,800.003130A66T9 0.00 496,650.001192500,000.00 1.750USTR 737.09 0.00 737.091.747101496,650.00912828SV3 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,105.97 0.00 2,105.971.2761011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 499,300.001217500,000.00 1.375USTR 582.31 0.00 582.311.373101499,300.00912828T26 0.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,738.45 0.00 4,738.451.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 989,687.5012411,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,270.49 0.00 1,270.491.511101989,687.50912828YV6 0.00 493,610.001193500,000.00 1.375USTR 582.31 0.00 582.311.389101493,610.00912828R77 0.00 985,800.0011171,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,277.48 0.00 1,277.481.526101985,800.009128282Q2 0.00 489,687.501178500,000.00 1.875USTR 794.05 0.00 794.051.909101489,687.509128282W9 0.00 248,000.001174248,000.00 3.000WELLS 631.89 0.00 631.893.000101248,000.00949763XY7 0.00 378,361.511057378,361.51WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.01101239,812.134159282482 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:04 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.159 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest July 1, 2020 - July 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 248,000.001169248,000.00 3.400MEDBA 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0058404DCX7 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 520.20 0.00 520.202.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 684.55 0.00 684.553.250101248,000.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 248,000.001173248,000.00 2.750MORTN 579.23 0.00 579.232.750101248,000.00619165JD6 0.00 245,000.001271245,000.00 1.600CAPONE 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.0014042TDD6 0.00 245,000.001176245,000.00 2.500ALLY 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0002007GHX4 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 305.75 0.00 305.751.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 70,644,117.99105570,644,117.99 0.920LAIF 49,427.26 0.00 49,427.260.85010168,463,512.6198-33-434 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.84 0.00 645.841.542101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 245,000.001081245,000.00 1.800RICHMN 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.00319267GC8 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 479.02 0.00 479.022.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 0.0010870.00 1.750MERCTL 69.04 0.00 69.041.750101240,000.0058740XZL7 0.00 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 0.0010940.00 1.750HIGHLD 138.08 0.00 138.081.750101240,000.00319141GT8 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 468.18 0.00 468.182.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 478.59 0.00 478.592.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 436.97 0.00 436.972.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 436.98 0.00 436.982.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 457.78 0.00 457.782.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001236245,000.00 1.900MSPRIV 395.36 0.00 395.361.900101245,000.0061760A3B3 0.00 245,000.001237245,000.00 1.950MORGST 405.76 0.00 405.761.950101245,000.0061690UNX4 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 499.40 0.00 499.402.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 245,000.001111245,000.00 2.050FREECU 426.57 0.00 426.572.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:04 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.160 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest July 1, 2020 - July 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 1,714,840.8211141,714,840.82CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001010.00SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 666.66 0.00 666.662.075101378,360.00594918BQ6 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 582.63 0.00 582.632.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 603.44 0.00 603.442.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 245,000.001124245,000.00 2.7001STTCH 561.82 0.00 561.822.700101245,000.0033715LBJ8 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 601.32 0.00 601.322.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 550.36 0.00 550.362.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 621.70 0.00 621.703.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001226245,000.00 1.800NYCMBK 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.00649447TC3 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 645.05 0.00 645.053.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 593.03 0.00 593.032.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 631.89 0.00 631.893.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 687.31 0.00 687.313.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 2,851,608.5111532,851,608.51 0.370CAMP 896.52 0.00 896.520.3701012,850,711.99SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 697.07 0.00 697.073.350101245,000.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 695.08 0.00 695.083.300101248,000.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 958.34 0.00 958.342.312101487,950.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 665.86 0.00 665.863.200101245,000.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 697.08 0.00 697.083.350101245,000.0090348JEJ5 0.00 248,000.001162248,000.00 3.400COMMBK 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0020143PDV9 0.00 248,000.001164248,000.00 3.550NMRCA 747.74 0.00 747.743.550101248,000.0067054NAN3 0.00 248,000.001165248,000.00 3.000FARMBU 631.89 0.00 631.893.000101248,000.00307660LC2 0.00 248,000.001166248,000.00 3.350REDRCK 705.61 0.00 705.613.350101248,000.0075701LAB3 0.00 245,000.001167245,000.00 3.200NEIGH 665.87 0.00 665.873.200101245,000.0064017AAQ7 0.00 245,000.001168245,000.00 3.1501STSRC 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0033646CKP8 0.00 245,000.001170245,000.00 3.400NLCOOP 707.48 0.00 707.483.400101245,000.00635573AL2 0.00 248,000.001171248,000.00 3.300MAINE 695.09 0.00 695.093.300101248,000.00560507AK1 0.00 248,000.001172248,000.00 3.350BARHAR 705.61 0.00 705.613.350101248,000.00066851WJ1 0.00 485,250.001175500,000.00 1.950COLGTE 812.50 0.00 812.501.971101485,250.0019416QEA4 0.00 0.0011830.00STIFEL 0.84 0.00 0.841010.00SYS1183 0.00 248,000.001179248,000.00 2.8001STNBK 589.76 0.00 589.762.800101248,000.0032117BCX4 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:04 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.161 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest July 1, 2020 - July 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001180248,000.00 2.700VERUS 568.71 0.00 568.712.700101248,000.0092535LCD4 0.00 248,000.001181248,000.00 2.950NRTHWS 621.36 0.00 621.362.950101248,000.0066736ABP3 0.00 248,000.001184248,000.00 2.500CENTNX 526.57 0.00 526.572.500101248,000.00156634AK3 0.00 245,000.001185245,000.00 3.250JPMORG 676.27 0.00 676.273.250101245,000.0048128HXU7 0.00 245,000.001186245,000.00 2.400IOWAST 499.40 0.00 499.402.400101245,000.0046256YAZ2 0.00 248,000.001187248,000.00 2.400TSCOLA 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.0087266AAA1 0.00 248,000.001188248,000.00 2.600MAINST 547.64 0.00 547.642.600101248,000.0056065GAG3 0.00 248,000.001189248,000.00 2.500CONGRS 526.58 0.00 526.582.500101248,000.0020726ABA5 0.00 496,650.001190500,000.00 2.350WALMRT 979.17 0.00 979.172.321101496,650.00931142DU4 0.00 245,000.001194245,000.00 2.500PITTS 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.00725404AB3 0.00 245,000.001195245,000.00 2.550PLAINS 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0072651LCL6 0.00 248,000.001196248,000.00 2.600EVNSCU 547.64 0.00 547.642.600101248,000.00299547AQ2 0.00 248,000.001197248,000.00 2.400LEGCY 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.00524661CB9 0.00 248,000.001199248,000.00 2.400CTZNST 505.52 0.00 505.522.400101248,000.00176688CP2 0.00 248,000.001200248,000.00 2.300AMERCU 484.45 0.00 484.452.300101248,000.0003065AAL7 0.00 245,000.001201245,000.00 2.150STRLNG 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0085916VDC6 0.00 248,000.001202248,000.00 2.250COMMW 473.92 0.00 473.922.250101248,000.0020416TAQ5 0.00 247,000.001203247,000.00 2.300REVER 482.50 0.00 482.502.300101247,000.00761402BY1 0.00 248,000.001205248,000.00 2.000AMRNTL 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0002772JBD1 0.00 248,000.001207248,000.00 1.950ABACUS 410.73 0.00 410.731.950101248,000.0000257TBD7 0.00 248,000.001208248,000.00 2.000LKSIDE 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0051210SQU4 0.00 248,000.001209248,000.00 2.0001STSEC 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0033625CCP2 0.00 248,000.001210248,000.00 2.000PEOPLE 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00710571DS6 0.00 248,000.001211248,000.00 2.100NFNITY 442.32 0.00 442.322.100101248,000.0045667EDY1 0.00 249,000.001213249,000.00 2.000PREFRD 422.96 0.00 422.962.000101249,000.00740367HP5 0.00 248,000.001214248,000.00 2.000UNTDCU 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00910160AH3 0.00 248,000.001215248,000.00 2.000WSHFED 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00938828BH2 0.00 249,000.001216249,000.00 1.9501STIER 412.38 0.00 412.381.950101249,000.0033766LAJ7 0.00 244,000.001218244,000.00 1.950RAYJAM 404.11 0.00 404.111.950101244,000.0075472RAD3 0.00 245,000.001219245,000.00 1.900CITBNK 395.36 0.00 395.361.900101245,000.0012556LBA3 0.00 248,000.001220248,000.00 1.850CELTIC 389.67 0.00 389.671.850101248,000.0015118RRH2 0.00 249,000.001221249,000.00 1.8501STNBS 391.24 0.00 391.241.850101249,000.00334342CD2 0.00 248,000.001222248,000.00 1.8001STDQN 379.13 0.00 379.131.800101248,000.00336460CX6 0.00 245,000.001225245,000.00 1.600LUANA 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.00549104JN8 0.00 1,671,857.5612281,671,857.56BOTW 0.01 0.00 0.011018,084,992.74059731851 0.00 248,000.001227248,000.00 1.700BNKWST 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0006652CHB0 0.00 10,481,313.32123010,481,313.32PARS 0.00 0.00 0.001010.00SYS1230 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:04 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.162 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 5 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest July 1, 2020 - July 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001231248,000.00 1.7001STSER 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0033640VDD7 0.00 248,000.001235248,000.00 1.700SAUKVL 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.00804375DL4 0.00 248,000.001238248,000.00 1.800LIVEOK 379.13 0.00 379.131.800101248,000.00538036GV0 0.00 248,000.001239248,000.00 1.900KERNCU 400.20 0.00 400.201.900101248,000.0049228XAK6 0.00 248,000.001240248,000.00 1.850SF FCU 389.67 0.00 389.671.850101248,000.0079772FAC0 0.00 248,000.001244248,000.00 1.900WFNBW 400.20 0.00 400.201.900101248,000.00949495AT2 0.00 248,000.001248248,000.00 1.550FRDMFI 326.48 0.00 326.481.550101248,000.0035637RDC8 0.00 248,000.001249248,000.00 1.650UNTDCM 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0090983WBT7 0.00 248,000.001250248,000.00 1.6501STNMI 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0032114VBT3 0.00 245,000.001251245,000.00 1.650RLLSTN 343.33 0.00 343.331.650101245,000.0077579ADF0 0.00 248,000.001252248,000.00 1.650CITADL 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0017286TAG0 0.00 245,000.001253245,000.00 1.600SYNOVS 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.0087164DRD4 0.00 248,000.001254248,000.00 1.600SERVIS 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.0081768PAF3 0.00 248,000.001255248,000.00 1.600AMERST 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.00029728BC5 0.00 248,000.001256248,000.00 1.600ACCSS 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.0000435JBH5 0.00 248,000.001257248,000.00 1.500SPRING 315.94 0.00 315.941.500101248,000.00849430BF9 0.00 248,000.001258248,000.00 1.650AXOS 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0005465DAE8 0.00 245,000.001259245,000.00 1.200CADNCE 249.70 0.00 249.701.200101245,000.0012738RFX7 0.00 245,000.001260245,000.00 1.100TEXAS 228.89 0.00 228.891.100101245,000.00882213AB7 0.00 248,000.001261248,000.00 1.100SNTCLR 231.69 0.00 231.691.100101248,000.0006424KBC3 0.00 248,000.001262248,000.00 1.350TRIAD 284.35 0.00 284.351.350101248,000.0089579NCD3 0.00 248,000.001263248,000.00 1.150NRTHSR 242.22 0.00 242.221.150101248,000.0066704MEQ0 0.00 248,000.001264248,000.00 1.300BELLCO 273.82 0.00 273.821.300101248,000.0007833EAD9 0.00 248,000.001265248,000.00 1.150WESTMI 242.22 0.00 242.221.150101248,000.00954444BS3 0.00 248,000.001266248,000.00 1.400NCOLET 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.00654062JZ2 0.00 248,000.001267248,000.00 1.400ALMABK 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.00020080BX4 0.00 248,000.001268248,000.00 1.250CMWBUS 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.002027506M2 0.00 245,000.001269245,000.00 1.300PACWST 270.50 0.00 270.501.300101245,000.0069506YRH4 0.00 248,000.001270248,000.00 1.250BELB&T 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.0008016PDQ9 0.00 248,000.001272248,000.00 1.250THEJEF 263.28 0.00 263.281.250101248,000.00472382AQ3 0.00 249,000.001273249,000.00 1.2001STFDM 253.77 0.00 253.771.200101249,000.0032027BAL1 0.00 248,000.001274248,000.00 1.3501STMCG 284.35 0.00 284.351.350101248,000.0032112UDR9 0.00 248,000.001276248,000.00 1.250FLGSTR 263.28 0.00 263.281.250101248,000.0033847E3A3 0.00 245,000.001277245,000.00 1.000WSTRNS 208.09 0.00 208.091.000101245,000.0095960NKD8 0.00 248,000.001278248,000.00 1.0001STINT 210.63 0.00 210.631.000101248,000.0032056GDJ6 0.00 248,000.001284248,000.00 0.600CHIPVA 126.38 0.00 126.380.600101248,000.00169894AS1 0.00 248,000.001285248,000.00 0.350AMR1ST 73.72 0.00 73.720.350101248,000.0002616AAH2 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:04 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.163 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 6 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest July 1, 2020 - July 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001286248,000.00 0.500STHRNB 105.32 0.00 105.320.500101248,000.0084223QAN7 0.00 248,000.001287248,000.00 0.500BKPRNC 105.32 0.00 105.320.500101248,000.00064520BG3 0.00 148,879,399.71Subtotal 148,680,137.07 1.117 144,892.830.00144,892.83141,057,066.83 0.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 5,360.9210585,360.92USBANK 0.02 0.00 0.020.0042315,360.90SYS1058 0.00 5,360.92Subtotal 5,360.92 0.004 0.020.000.025,360.90 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 223,898.001062223,898.00LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241219,214.99SYS1062 0.00 223,898.00Subtotal 223,898.00 0.000.000.00219,214.99 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 16,510,033.50111316,510,033.50 0.920LAIF 11,855.47 0.00 11,855.470.83324916,748,919.9725-33-005 0.00 16,510,033.50Subtotal 16,510,033.50 0.833 11,855.470.0011,855.4716,748,919.97 0.00 165,618,692.13Total 165,419,429.49 1.088 156,748.320.00156,748.32158,030,562.69 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:04 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.164 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management August 31, 2020 City of La Quinta - Portfolio Summary % of Portfolio Book ValueInvestmentsMarket Value Par Value Days to MaturityTerm YTM 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 4,025,365.14 12.42 0.00014,025,365.144,025,365.14 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 55,644,117.99 133.40 0.784155,980,465.1955,644,117.99 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 16,510,033.50 19.91 0.784116,592,317.5116,510,033.50 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 2,852,332.18 11.71 0.30012,852,332.182,852,332.18 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 16,011,692.36 1,5659.61 1.3461,24516,431,175.0016,050,000.00 Treasury Coupon Securities 9,911,735.00 1,6535.95 1.50652910,174,170.0010,000,000.00 Certificate of Deposits 33,684,000.00 1,55020.22 2.1631,00235,310,197.3333,684,000.00 Corporate Notes 2,341,260.00 1,4361.41 2.7257132,483,341.002,400,000.00 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 13,302,075.08 17.98 0.000113,302,075.0813,302,075.08 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1,714,840.82 11.03 0.00011,714,840.821,714,840.82 PARS Pension Trust 10,615,259.76 16.37 0.000110,615,259.7610,615,259.76 166,612,711.83 100.00%Investments 169,481,539.01166,798,024.47 583 364 1.039 Current Year August 31 164,528.75 Fiscal Year To Date 321,277.07 Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 156,561,995.94 163,101,339.38 1.16%1.24% Total Earnings Month Ending I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. __________________________________________________ ____________________ Karla Romero, Finance Director Portfolio CITY CP Reporting period 08/01/2020-08/31/2020 Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:13 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 December 8, 2020 65 Days toMaturityPage 1Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueAugust 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateBank Accounts1Bank of the West12283,585,673.41 3,585,673.4108/20/2019 3,585,673.41 10597318510.0001City Petty Cash10593,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS10590.0001La Quinta Palms Realty1062239,433.72 239,433.7207/01/2016 239,433.72 1SYS10620.0001Stifel, Nicolaus & Company11830.00 0.0003/18/2019 0.00 1SYS11830.0001Wells Fargo1057196,958.01 196,958.0107/01/2016 196,958.01 141592824820.0004,025,365.1414,025,365.144,025,365.142,495,087.25Subtotal and Average10.000Local Agency Investment Fund-City1Local Agency Inv Fund105555,644,117.99 55,644,117.99 0.78455,980,465.19 198-33-4340.78455,644,117.99155,980,465.1955,644,117.9960,966,698.64Subtotal and Average10.784Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing1Local Agency Inv Fund111316,510,033.50 16,510,033.50 0.78416,592,317.51 125-33-0050.78416,510,033.50116,592,317.5116,510,033.5016,510,033.50Subtotal and Average10.784Money Market Accounts - CAMP1California Asset Management Pr11532,852,332.18 2,852,332.18 0.30009/26/2018 2,852,332.18 1SYS11530.3002,852,332.1812,852,332.182,852,332.182,851,631.85Subtotal and Average10.300Federal Agency Coupon Securities10Federal Home Loan Bank11041,000,000.00 996,800.00 09/11/20201.62511/09/2017 1,000,400.00 1,0373130A66T91.741365Federal Farm Credit Bank11051,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 1,015,170.00 1,3923133EHWM11.913735Federal National Mtg Assn12331,000,000.00 992,100.00 09/06/20221.37510/29/2019 1,023,950.00 1,0433135G0W331.659758Federal Farm Credit Bank12471,000,000.00 999,217.36 09/29/20221.40002/05/2020 1,024,840.00 9673133EGWJ01.430832Federal Farm Credit Bank1198500,000.00 499,500.00 12/12/20221.87506/20/2019 518,850.00 1,2713133EKQP41.9051,077Federal Farm Credit Bank1223500,000.00 499,400.00 08/14/20231.60009/12/2019 519,880.00 1,4323133EKZK51.6321,099Federal Farm Credit Bank1158250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 269,085.00 1,7863133EJYL73.0411,156Federal Farm Credit Bank12341,000,000.00 996,900.00 11/01/20231.60011/01/2019 1,041,950.00 1,4613133EK4X11.6801,260Federal Home Loan Bank1177500,000.00 498,550.00 02/13/20242.50003/01/2019 538,840.00 1,8103130AFW942.5631,261Federal Farm Credit Bank12461,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/14/20241.43002/14/2020 1,039,090.00 1,4613133ELNE01.4561,400Federal National Mtg Assn1206500,000.00 495,950.00 07/02/20241.75007/15/2019 527,615.00 1,8143135G0V751.9221,424Federal Farm Credit Bank1212500,000.00 499,500.00 07/26/20241.85008/02/2019 529,350.00 1,8203133EKWV41.8711,477Federal Farm Credit Bank1224500,000.00 498,750.00 09/17/20241.60009/17/2019525,100.001,8273133EKP751.6521,477Federal Farm Credit Bank12421,000,000.00998,600.0009/17/20241.70012/17/20191,054,210.001,7363133ELEA81.7311,693Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp12751,000,000.00998,500.0004/21/20250.70004/28/20201,000,460.001,8193134GVLC00.7311,729Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp12791,000,000.001,000,000.0005/27/20250.62505/27/20201,001,390.001,8263134GVYG70.625Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:13PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0Report Ver. 7.3.6.166 Days toMaturityPage 2Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueAugust 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateFederal Agency Coupon Securities1,742Federal Farm Credit Bank1280500,000.00 499,850.00 06/09/20250.50006/09/2020 501,895.00 1,8263133ELH230.5061,743Federal Farm Credit Bank1282500,000.00 500,000.00 06/10/20250.68006/10/2020 500,385.00 1,8263133ELH800.6801,746Federal Home Loan Bank1281500,000.00 499,850.00 06/13/20250.50006/03/2020 502,265.00 1,8363130AJKW80.5061,763Federal Home Loan Bank1283300,000.00 300,000.00 06/30/20250.68006/30/2020 299,685.00 1,8263130AJRP60.6801,808Federal National Mtg Assn1288500,000.00 500,000.00 08/14/20250.50008/14/2020 499,015.00 1,8263135G05S80.5001,812Federal National Mtg Assn1290500,000.00 499,750.00 08/18/20250.52008/28/2020 499,060.00 1,8163136G4M750.5301,815Federal National Mtg Assn12891,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 08/21/20250.56008/21/2020 998,690.00 1,8263136G4N740.56016,011,692.361,56516,431,175.0016,050,000.0014,721,587.52Subtotal and Average1,245 1.346Treasury Coupon Securities272U.S. Treasury1193500,000.00 493,610.00 05/31/20211.37505/31/2019 504,550.00 731912828R772.030302U.S. Treasury10455,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 5,040,250.00 1,808912828S271.125425U.S. Treasury10702,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 2,024,840.00 1,679912828T671.903621U.S. Treasury1192500,000.00 496,650.00 05/15/20221.75005/31/2019 513,635.00 1,080912828SV31.984759U.S. Treasury1178500,000.00 489,687.50 09/30/20221.87503/01/2019 518,085.00 1,3099128282W92.4801,124U.S. Treasury1217500,000.00 499,300.00 09/30/20231.37508/21/2019 518,790.00 1,501912828T261.4101,551U.S. Treasury12411,000,000.00 989,687.50 11/30/20241.50012/16/2019 1,054,020.00 1,811912828YV61.7189,911,735.001,65310,174,170.0010,000,000.0010,356,935.00Subtotal and Average529 1.506Certificate of Deposits48First Tech Federal Credit Unio1124245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20202.70004/18/2018 245,882.00 91533715LBJ82.62383First Bank Richmond1081245,000.00 245,000.00 11/23/20201.80006/21/2017 245,992.25 1,251319267GC81.802112Freedom Credit Union1111245,000.00 245,000.00 12/22/20202.05012/22/2017 246,523.90 1,09635638BAA92.052135Bankers Bank1086240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 241,545.60 1,28006610RAP41.804139Farm Bureau Bank1165248,000.00 248,000.00 01/18/20213.00012/17/2018 250,785.04 763307660LC22.898141Eagle Bank1146245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 247,648.45 91527002YDV52.858153Infinty FCU1211248,000.00 248,000.00 02/01/20212.10007/31/2019 250,110.48 55145667EDY12.110174Comenity Capital Bank1009240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 241,864.80 1,82720033APG51.702188Ally Bank Midvale1176245,000.00 245,000.00 03/08/20212.50003/07/2019 248,104.15 73202007GHX42.016196Unity Bank1120245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 248,302.60 1,09691330ABN62.552230Amex Centurion1077240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 243,321.60 1,46102587DP852.252241Towne Bank1128240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 244,358.40 1,09689214PBL22.803267PrivateBank & Trust1032240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016242,714.401,82674267GVG91.501279Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082240,000.00240,000.0006/07/20212.25006/07/2017244,022.401,46114042RGD72.252316Central State Bank1085240,000.00240,000.0007/14/20211.85007/14/2017243,679.201,46115523RBJ41.851349General Electric Credit Union1150240,000.00240,000.0008/16/20213.10008/15/2018246,909.601,097369674AV83.100Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:13PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.067 Days toMaturityPage 3Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueAugust 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits391New York Community Bank1226245,000.00 245,000.00 09/27/20211.80009/27/2019 249,444.30 731649447TC31.802420Northpointe Bank1127240,000.00 240,000.00 10/26/20212.70004/26/2018 247,164.00 1,279666613GV02.703442First Source Bank1168245,000.00 245,000.00 11/17/20213.15012/17/2018 254,091.95 1,06633646CKP83.153447Belmont Savings Bank1102245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 250,955.95 1,462080515CD92.101447TNB Bank1187248,000.00 248,000.00 11/22/20212.40005/22/2019 254,941.52 91587266AAA12.407476Neighbors FCU1167245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20213.20012/21/2018 254,875.95 1,09664017AAQ73.203477United Credit Union1214248,000.00 248,000.00 12/22/20212.00008/22/2019 254,100.80 853910160AH32.003505The Ohio Valley Bank1089240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017 245,899.20 1,645677721CN01.903517Third Federal Savings and Loan1112245,000.00 245,000.00 01/31/20222.50001/30/2018 253,276.10 1,46288413QBY32.502518Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066240,000.00 240,000.00 02/01/20222.25002/01/2017 247,264.80 1,8262546722U12.251541BMW Bank1067240,000.00 240,000.00 02/24/20222.20002/24/2017 247,401.60 1,82605580AGK42.201545Maine Savings FCU1171248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20223.30012/28/2018 259,735.36 1,158560507AK13.306563Luana Savings Bank1225245,000.00 245,000.00 03/18/20221.60009/18/2019250,566.40912549104JN81.599575Bellco Credit Union1264248,000.00248,000.0003/30/20221.30003/31/2020252,573.1272907833EAD91.300576Cadence Bank, NA1259245,000.00245,000.0003/31/20221.20003/31/2020249,142.9573012738RFX71.200576Bank of Santa Clarita1261248,000.00248,000.0003/31/20221.10003/31/2020251,789.4473006424KBC31.100602Goldman Sachs1078240,000.00240,000.0004/26/20222.40004/26/2017248,976.001,82638148PJK42.401605Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126240,000.00240,000.0004/29/20222.80004/30/2018250,617.601,46030960QAG22.802623Kansas State Bank1101245,000.00245,000.0005/17/20222.10011/17/2017253,219.751,64250116CBE82.099639Synchrony Bank Retail1080240,000.00240,000.0006/02/20222.40006/02/2017249,513.601,82687164XQV12.401645PCSB Bank1149245,000.00245,000.0006/08/20223.00006/08/2018257,389.651,46169324MAD73.002646Synovus Bank1253245,000.00245,000.0006/09/20221.60003/09/2020251,347.9582287164DRD41.602650Allegiance Bank1143245,000.00245,000.0006/13/20223.10006/13/2018257,938.451,46101748DBE53.102658Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083240,000.00240,000.0006/21/20222.35006/21/2017249,571.201,826795450A702.351665America's Credit Union1200248,000.00248,000.0006/28/20222.30006/28/2019257,753.841,09603065AAL72.302706Traditions Bank1148245,000.00245,000.0008/08/20223.00006/08/2018258,516.651,52289269CBX93.002721CIT Bank NA1219245,000.00245,000.0008/23/20221.90008/23/2019253,501.501,09612556LBA31.902727American Express Fed Savings B1096240,000.00240,000.0008/29/20222.40008/29/2017250,060.801,82602587CFU92.402727Sterling Bank1201245,000.00245,000.0008/29/20222.15006/28/2019254,780.401,15885916VDC62.153772Alliance Credit Union1095245,000.00245,000.0010/13/20222.25010/13/2017255,829.001,82601859BAA32.251784Barclays Bank1097240,000.00240,000.0010/25/20222.30010/25/2017251,023.201,82606740KLJ42.291787Merrick Bank1163248,000.00248,000.0010/28/20223.25010/30/2018264,519.281,45959013J4K23.252798Mountain America Federal CU1099245,000.00245,000.0011/08/20222.30011/08/2017256,431.701,82662384RAC02.301808CrossFirst Bank1106245,000.00245,000.0011/18/20222.20011/20/2017256,039.701,82422766ACB92.201818Enterprise Bank, NA1107245,000.00245,000.0011/28/20222.15011/28/2017255,880.451,82629367QCP12.151827Medallion Bank1169248,000.00248,000.0012/07/20223.40012/07/2018266,148.641,46158404DCX73.402Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:13PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.068 Days toMaturityPage 4Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueAugust 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits827Red Rocks Credit Union1166248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.35012/07/2018 265,868.40 1,46175701LAB33.352849Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110245,000.00 245,000.00 12/29/20222.40012/29/2017 257,693.45 1,826499724AB82.401850Kern FCU1239248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.90012/30/2019 257,974.56 1,09649228XAK61.902850San Francisco FCU1240248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.85012/30/2019 257,686.88 1,09679772FAC01.852881Wells Fargo Natl Bank West1244248,000.00 248,000.00 01/30/20231.90001/29/2020 258,299.44 1,097949495AT21.900903Servisfirst Bank1254248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20231.60002/21/2020 256,689.92 1,09681768PAF31.601910Verus Bank of Commerce1180248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20232.70002/28/2019 263,539.68 1,46192535LCD42.700932Aneca Federal Credit Union1119245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018 261,356.20 1,826034577AH92.802941Northstar Bank1263248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 254,152.88 1,09566704MEQ01.150941West Michigan Cmnty Bk1265248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 254,152.88 1,095954444BS31.150952Citibank NA1123245,000.00 245,000.00 04/11/20232.90004/11/2018 262,309.25 1,82617312QJ262.902969Congressional Bank1189248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20232.50004/30/2019 263,192.48 1,45920726ABA52.502969EnerBank USA1125240,000.00 240,000.00 04/28/20232.95004/30/2018257,570.401,82429278TAY62.952976First National Bank1179248,000.00248,000.0005/05/20232.80003/05/2019265,285.601,52232117BCX42.802986University of Iowa Comm. CU1134240,000.00240,000.0005/15/20233.05005/14/2018258,511.201,82791435LAG23.0521,009Pittsfield Cooperative Bank1194245,000.00245,000.0006/07/20232.50006/07/2019260,582.001,461725404AB32.5021,022Morton Community1173248,000.00248,000.0006/20/20232.75003/20/2019265,689.841,553619165JD62.7531,022RCB Bank1144245,000.00245,000.0006/20/20233.15006/20/2018265,217.401,82674934YAH43.1521,028American First CU1285248,000.00248,000.0006/26/20230.35006/26/2020249,036.641,09502616AAH20.3501,051American National Bank1205248,000.00248,000.0007/19/20232.00007/19/2019260,809.201,46102772JBD12.0011,052First National Bank of America1147245,000.00245,000.0007/20/20233.15007/20/2018265,778.451,82632110YLK93.1521,063Bank of New England1151249,000.00249,000.0007/31/20233.25007/31/2018271,031.521,82606426KAN83.2521,086Raymond James Bank1218244,000.00244,000.0008/23/20231.95008/23/2019256,639.201,46175472RAD31.9511,123Triad Bank1262248,000.00248,000.0009/29/20231.35003/30/2020256,608.081,27889579NCD31.3521,141Marlin Business Bank1155248,000.00248,000.0010/17/20233.30010/17/2018271,798.081,82657116ARV23.3021,141Municipal Trust and Savings1160245,000.00245,000.0010/17/20233.20010/17/2018267,745.801,826625925AR33.2021,141UBS Bank USA1161245,000.00245,000.0010/17/20233.35010/17/2018268,892.401,82690348JEJ53.3521,143Jefferson Financial CU1154245,000.00245,000.0010/19/20233.35010/19/2018268,919.351,826474067AQ83.3521,170Commercial Bank1162248,000.00248,000.0011/15/20233.40011/15/2018273,119.921,82620143PDV93.4021,183Numerica Credit Union1164248,000.00248,000.0011/28/20233.55011/28/2018274,575.681,82667054NAN33.5521,206National Cooperative Bank, N.A1170245,000.00245,000.0012/21/20233.40012/21/2018270,516.751,826635573AL23.4021,214Bar Harbor Bank and Trust1172248,000.00248,000.0012/29/20233.35012/31/2018273,566.321,824066851WJ13.3521,245Lakeside Bank1208248,000.00248,000.0001/29/20242.00007/30/2019262,756.001,64451210SQU42.0031,259Rollstone B&T1251245,000.00245,000.0002/12/20241.65002/12/2020256,777.151,46177579ADF01.6511,260Northwest Bank1181248,000.00248,000.0002/13/20242.95002/13/2019270,987.121,82666736ABP32.9511,274Wells Fargo1174248,000.00248,000.0002/27/20243.00002/27/2019270,533.281,826949763XY73.001Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:13PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.069 Days toMaturityPage 5Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueAugust 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits1,304Texas Bank Financial1260245,000.00 245,000.00 03/28/20241.10003/31/2020 252,298.55 1,458882213AB71.1011,322The Jefferson Bank1272248,000.00 248,000.00 04/15/20241.25004/15/2020 256,779.20 1,461472382AQ31.2511,323Belmont Bank and Trust1270248,000.00 248,000.00 04/16/20241.25004/16/2020 256,781.68 1,46108016PDQ91.2511,323Pacific Western Bank1269245,000.00 245,000.00 04/16/20241.30004/16/2020 254,114.00 1,46169506YRH41.3011,333Main Street Bank1188248,000.00 248,000.00 04/26/20242.60004/26/2019 269,003.12 1,82756065GAG32.6031,352First Service Bank1231248,000.00 248,000.00 05/15/20241.70011/15/2019 261,027.44 1,64333640VDD71.7011,353JP Morgan Chase1185245,000.00 245,000.00 05/16/20243.25005/16/2019 239,071.00 1,82748128HXU73.2541,360Iowa State Bank1186245,000.00 245,000.00 05/23/20242.40005/23/2019 264,293.75 1,82746256YAZ22.4031,365Live Oak Bank1238248,000.00 248,000.00 05/28/20241.80011/27/2019 262,046.72 1,644538036GV01.8021,366Century Next Bank1184248,000.00 248,000.00 05/29/20242.50005/29/2019 268,524.48 1,827156634AK32.5031,375Plains Commerce Bank1195245,000.00 245,000.00 06/07/20242.55006/07/2019 265,834.80 1,82772651LCL62.5531,380Evansville Teachers Credit FCU1196248,000.00 248,000.00 06/12/20242.60006/12/2019 269,620.64 1,827299547AQ22.6031,387Legacy Bank1197248,000.00 248,000.00 06/19/20242.40006/19/2019267,837.521,827524661CB92.4031,389Citizens State Bank1199248,000.00248,000.0006/21/20242.40006/21/2019267,862.321,827176688CP22.4031,396Communitywide FCU1202248,000.00248,000.0006/28/20242.25006/28/2019266,572.721,82720416TAQ52.2531,396Revere Bank1203247,000.00247,000.0006/28/20242.30006/28/2019265,927.611,827761402BY12.3031,424Abacus Federal Savings1207248,000.00248,000.0007/26/20241.95007/26/2019263,946.401,82700257TBD71.9521,428First Security Bank of WA1209248,000.00248,000.0007/30/20242.00007/30/2019264,464.721,82733625CCP22.0021,429People's Bank1210248,000.00248,000.0007/31/20242.00007/31/2019264,462.241,827710571DS62.0021,445Preferred Bank1213249,000.00249,000.0008/16/20242.00008/16/2019265,673.041,827740367HP52.0021,452FirsTier Bank1216249,000.00249,000.0008/23/20241.95008/23/2019265,244.761,82733766LAJ71.9521,452Washington Federal1215248,000.00248,000.0008/23/20242.00008/23/2019264,670.561,827938828BH22.0021,459First State Bk DeQueen1222248,000.00248,000.0008/30/20241.80008/30/2019262,760.961,827336460CX61.8021,459First Natl Bk of Syracuse1221249,000.00249,000.0008/30/20241.85008/30/2019264,315.991,827334342CD21.8521,459Celtic Bank1220248,000.00248,000.0008/30/20241.85008/30/2019263,254.481,82715118RRH21.8521,487BankWest Inc1227248,000.00248,000.0009/27/20241.70009/27/2019261,954.961,82706652CHB01.7021,515Southern Bancorp Bk1286248,000.00248,000.0010/25/20240.50006/26/2020249,867.441,58284223QAN70.5001,528Sauk Valley B&T Co1235248,000.00248,000.0011/07/20241.70011/07/2019262,217.841,827804375DL41.7021,541Morgan Stanley Bank1237245,000.00245,000.0011/20/20241.95011/20/2019261,696.751,82761690UNX41.9521,541Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1236245,000.00245,000.0011/20/20241.90011/20/2019261,184.701,82761760A3B31.9021,581Bank Princeton1287248,000.00248,000.0012/30/20240.50006/30/2020249,758.321,644064520BG30.5001,620United Community1249248,000.00248,000.0002/07/20251.65002/07/2020262,240.161,82790983WBT71.6521,627First National Bank Michigan1250248,000.00248,000.0002/14/20251.65002/14/2020262,282.321,82732114VBT31.6521,627Freedom Financial1248248,000.00248,000.0002/14/20251.55002/14/2020261,186.161,82735637RDC81.5521,634American State1255248,000.00248,000.0002/21/20251.60002/21/2020261,771.441,827029728BC51.6021,640Citadel FCU1252248,000.00248,000.0002/27/20251.65002/27/2020262,356.721,82717286TAG01.652Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:13PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.070 Days toMaturityPage 6Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueAugust 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits1,654Access Bank1256248,000.00 248,000.00 03/13/20251.60003/13/2020 261,897.92 1,82600435JBH51.6011,661Spring Bank1257248,000.00 248,000.00 03/20/20251.50003/20/2020 260,814.16 1,826849430BF91.5011,667Axos Bank1258248,000.00 248,000.00 03/26/20251.65003/26/2020 262,527.84 1,82605465DAE81.6511,669Alma Bank1267248,000.00 248,000.00 03/28/20251.40003/30/2020 259,713.04 1,824020080BX41.3991,672Commonwealth Business Bk1268248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.25003/31/2020 258,046.48 1,8262027506M21.2511,672Nicolet Natl Bank1266248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.40003/31/2020 259,730.40 1,826654062JZ21.4011,680Capital One USA FDIC339541271245,000.00 245,000.00 04/08/20251.60004/08/2020 258,847.40 1,82614042TDD61.6011,700Firrst Natl Bk McGregor1274248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20251.35004/28/2020 259,266.64 1,82632112UDR91.3511,701First Freedom Bank1273249,000.00 249,000.00 04/29/20251.20004/29/2020 258,588.99 1,82632027BAL11.2011,702Flagstar1276248,000.00 248,000.00 04/30/20251.25004/30/2020 258,118.40 1,82633847E3A31.2511,7141st Internet Bank1278248,000.00 248,000.00 05/12/20251.00005/11/2020 255,273.84 1,82732056GDJ60.9851,715Western State Bank1277245,000.00 245,000.00 05/13/20251.00005/13/2020 252,183.40 1,82695960NKD81.0011,757Chippewa Valley Bk1284248,000.00 248,000.00 06/24/20250.60006/24/2020252,372.241,826169894AS10.60033,684,000.001,55035,310,197.3333,684,000.0033,684,000.00Subtotal and Average1,002 2.163Corporate Notes337Apple Inc1079500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 505,780.00 1,514037833CC21.900523Proctor and Gamble1159500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 514,480.00 1,210742718DY23.071835Wal-Mart Stores, Inc1190500,000.00 496,650.00 12/15/20222.35004/16/2019 523,245.00 1,339931142DU42.799883Colgate-Palmolive1175500,000.00 485,250.00 02/01/20231.95003/04/2019 520,980.00 1,43019416QEA42.7511,071Microsoft Corporation1157400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 418,856.00 1,758594918BQ63.2222,341,260.001,4362,483,341.002,400,000.002,341,260.00Subtotal and Average713 2.725Money Market with Fiscal Agent1US Bank105813,302,075.08 13,302,075.0807/01/2016 13,302,075.08 1SYS10580.00013,302,075.08113,302,075.0813,302,075.08434,287.18Subtotal and Average10.000CERBT - OPEB Trust1CalPERS CERBT Plan11141,714,840.82 1,714,840.8207/01/2020 1,714,840.82 1SYS11140.0001,714,840.8211,714,840.821,714,840.821,714,840.82Subtotal and Average10.000PARS Pension Trust1Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Serv123010,615,259.76 10,615,259.7607/01/2020 10,615,259.76 1SYS12300.00010,615,259.76110,615,259.7610,615,259.7610,485,634.17Subtotal and Average10.000Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:13PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.071 Days toMaturityPage 7Par ValueBook ValueStatedRateMarket ValueAugust 31, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDate583156,561,995.94 166,798,024.47364 1.039169,481,539.01 166,612,711.83Total and AveragePortfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:13PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.072 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund August 1, 2020 - August 31, 2020 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 1,000,000.0012891,000,000.00 0.560FNMA 155.56 0.00 155.560.5161010.003136G4N74 0.00 500,000.001288500,000.00 0.500FNMA 118.06 0.00 118.060.4791010.003135G05S8 0.00 499,750.001290500,000.00 0.520FNMA 21.67 0.00 21.670.3961010.003136G4M75 0.00 992,100.0012331,000,000.00 1.375FNMA 1,145.84 0.00 1,145.841.360101992,100.003135G0W33 0.00 495,950.001206500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.17 0.00 729.171.731101495,950.003135G0V75 0.00 1,000,000.0012791,000,000.00 0.625FHLMC 520.83 0.00 520.830.6131011,000,000.003134GVYG7 0.00 998,500.0012751,000,000.00 0.700FHLMC 583.34 0.00 583.340.688101998,500.003134GVLC0 0.00 996,900.0012341,000,000.00 1.600FFCB 1,333.33 0.00 1,333.331.575101996,900.003133EK4X1 0.00 499,500.001198500,000.00 1.875FFCB 781.25 0.00 781.251.842101499,500.003133EKQP4 0.00 498,750.001224500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.66 0.00 666.661.574101498,750.003133EKP75 0.00 998,600.0012421,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.66 0.00 1,416.661.670101998,600.003133ELEA8 0.00 499,400.001223500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.67 0.00 666.671.572101499,400.003133EKZK5 0.00 999,000.0012461,000,000.00 1.430FFCB 1,191.67 0.00 1,191.671.404101999,000.003133ELNE0 0.00 999,217.3612471,000,000.00 1.400FFCB 1,166.67 0.00 1,166.671.375101999,217.363133EGWJ0 0.00 499,850.001280500,000.00 0.500FFCB 208.33 0.00 208.330.491101499,850.003133ELH23 0.00 500,000.001282500,000.00 0.680FFCB 283.33 0.00 283.330.667101500,000.003133ELH80 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.681101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 499,500.001212500,000.00 1.850FFCB 770.84 0.00 770.841.817101499,500.003133EKWV4 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 583.33 0.00 583.332.778101247,275.003133EJYL7 0.00 300,000.001283300,000.00 0.680FHLB 170.00 0.00 170.000.667101300,000.003130AJRP6 0.00 499,850.001281500,000.00 0.500FHLB 208.34 0.00 208.340.491101499,850.003130AJKW8 0.00 498,550.001177500,000.00 2.500FHLB 1,041.67 0.00 1,041.672.460101498,550.003130AFW94 0.00 996,800.0011041,000,000.00 1.625FHLB 1,354.17 0.00 1,354.171.600101996,800.003130A66T9 0.00 496,650.001192500,000.00 1.750USTR 737.09 0.00 737.091.747101496,650.00912828SV3 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,105.98 0.00 2,105.981.2761011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 499,300.001217500,000.00 1.375USTR 582.31 0.00 582.311.373101499,300.00912828T26 0.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,738.46 0.00 4,738.461.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 989,687.5012411,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,270.50 0.00 1,270.501.511101989,687.50912828YV6 0.00 493,610.001193500,000.00 1.375USTR 582.31 0.00 582.311.389101493,610.00912828R77 0.00 0.0011170.00 1.500USTR 576.92 0.00 14,776.9239.080101985,800.009128282Q2 14,200.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:40 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.173 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest August 1, 2020 - August 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 489,687.501178500,000.00 1.875USTR 794.06 0.00 794.061.909101489,687.509128282W9 0.00 248,000.001174248,000.00 3.000WELLS 631.89 0.00 631.893.000101248,000.00949763XY7 0.00 196,958.011057196,958.01WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.01101378,361.514159282482 0.00 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 248,000.001169248,000.00 3.400MEDBA 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0058404DCX7 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 684.55 0.00 684.553.250101248,000.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 248,000.001173248,000.00 2.750MORTN 579.23 0.00 579.232.750101248,000.00619165JD6 0.00 245,000.001271245,000.00 1.600CAPONE 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.0014042TDD6 0.00 245,000.001176245,000.00 2.500ALLY 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0002007GHX4 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 305.75 0.00 305.751.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 55,644,117.99105555,644,117.99 0.784LAIF 43,827.63 0.00 43,827.630.73010170,644,117.9998-33-434 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.83 0.00 645.831.542101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 245,000.001081245,000.00 1.800RICHMN 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.00319267GC8 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 479.01 0.00 479.012.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 468.19 0.00 468.192.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 478.59 0.00 478.592.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 436.97 0.00 436.972.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 436.97 0.00 436.972.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 457.78 0.00 457.782.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001236245,000.00 1.900MSPRIV 395.36 0.00 395.361.900101245,000.0061760A3B3 0.00 245,000.001237245,000.00 1.950MORGST 405.76 0.00 405.761.950101245,000.0061690UNX4 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 499.40 0.00 499.402.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 245,000.001111245,000.00 2.050FREECU 426.57 0.00 426.572.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:40 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.174 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest August 1, 2020 - August 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 1,714,840.8211141,714,840.82CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001011,714,840.82SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 666.67 0.00 666.672.075101378,360.00594918BQ6 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 582.63 0.00 582.632.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 603.44 0.00 603.442.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 245,000.001124245,000.00 2.7001STTCH 561.82 0.00 561.822.700101245,000.0033715LBJ8 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 601.32 0.00 601.322.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 550.36 0.00 550.362.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 621.70 0.00 621.703.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001226245,000.00 1.800NYCMBK 374.54 0.00 374.541.800101245,000.00649447TC3 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 645.06 0.00 645.063.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 593.03 0.00 593.032.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 631.89 0.00 631.893.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 687.31 0.00 687.313.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 2,852,332.1811532,852,332.18 0.300CAMP 723.67 0.00 723.670.2991012,851,608.51SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 697.08 0.00 697.083.350101245,000.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 695.08 0.00 695.083.300101248,000.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 958.33 0.00 958.332.312101487,950.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 665.86 0.00 665.863.200101245,000.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 697.08 0.00 697.083.350101245,000.0090348JEJ5 0.00 248,000.001162248,000.00 3.400COMMBK 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0020143PDV9 0.00 248,000.001164248,000.00 3.550NMRCA 747.74 0.00 747.743.550101248,000.0067054NAN3 0.00 248,000.001165248,000.00 3.000FARMBU 631.89 0.00 631.893.000101248,000.00307660LC2 0.00 248,000.001166248,000.00 3.350REDRCK 705.61 0.00 705.613.350101248,000.0075701LAB3 0.00 245,000.001167245,000.00 3.200NEIGH 665.86 0.00 665.863.200101245,000.0064017AAQ7 0.00 245,000.001168245,000.00 3.1501STSRC 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0033646CKP8 0.00 245,000.001170245,000.00 3.400NLCOOP 707.48 0.00 707.483.400101245,000.00635573AL2 0.00 248,000.001171248,000.00 3.300MAINE 695.08 0.00 695.083.300101248,000.00560507AK1 0.00 248,000.001172248,000.00 3.350BARHAR 705.61 0.00 705.613.350101248,000.00066851WJ1 0.00 485,250.001175500,000.00 1.950COLGTE 812.50 0.00 812.501.971101485,250.0019416QEA4 0.00 0.0011830.00STIFEL 1.75 0.00 1.751010.00SYS1183 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:40 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.175 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest August 1, 2020 - August 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001179248,000.00 2.8001STNBK 589.76 0.00 589.762.800101248,000.0032117BCX4 0.00 248,000.001180248,000.00 2.700VERUS 568.70 0.00 568.702.700101248,000.0092535LCD4 0.00 248,000.001181248,000.00 2.950NRTHWS 621.36 0.00 621.362.950101248,000.0066736ABP3 0.00 248,000.001184248,000.00 2.500CENTNX 526.58 0.00 526.582.500101248,000.00156634AK3 0.00 245,000.001185245,000.00 3.250JPMORG 676.27 0.00 676.273.250101245,000.0048128HXU7 0.00 245,000.001186245,000.00 2.400IOWAST 499.40 0.00 499.402.400101245,000.0046256YAZ2 0.00 248,000.001187248,000.00 2.400TSCOLA 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.0087266AAA1 0.00 248,000.001188248,000.00 2.600MAINST 547.64 0.00 547.642.600101248,000.0056065GAG3 0.00 248,000.001189248,000.00 2.500CONGRS 526.58 0.00 526.582.500101248,000.0020726ABA5 0.00 496,650.001190500,000.00 2.350WALMRT 979.17 0.00 979.172.321101496,650.00931142DU4 0.00 245,000.001194245,000.00 2.500PITTS 520.20 0.00 520.202.500101245,000.00725404AB3 0.00 245,000.001195245,000.00 2.550PLAINS 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0072651LCL6 0.00 248,000.001196248,000.00 2.600EVNSCU 547.64 0.00 547.642.600101248,000.00299547AQ2 0.00 248,000.001197248,000.00 2.400LEGCY 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.00524661CB9 0.00 248,000.001199248,000.00 2.400CTZNST 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.00176688CP2 0.00 248,000.001200248,000.00 2.300AMERCU 484.45 0.00 484.452.300101248,000.0003065AAL7 0.00 245,000.001201245,000.00 2.150STRLNG 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0085916VDC6 0.00 248,000.001202248,000.00 2.250COMMW 473.92 0.00 473.922.250101248,000.0020416TAQ5 0.00 247,000.001203247,000.00 2.300REVER 482.49 0.00 482.492.300101247,000.00761402BY1 0.00 248,000.001205248,000.00 2.000AMRNTL 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0002772JBD1 0.00 248,000.001207248,000.00 1.950ABACUS 410.73 0.00 410.731.950101248,000.0000257TBD7 0.00 248,000.001208248,000.00 2.000LKSIDE 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0051210SQU4 0.00 248,000.001209248,000.00 2.0001STSEC 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0033625CCP2 0.00 248,000.001210248,000.00 2.000PEOPLE 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00710571DS6 0.00 248,000.001211248,000.00 2.100NFNITY 442.32 0.00 442.322.100101248,000.0045667EDY1 0.00 249,000.001213249,000.00 2.000PREFRD 422.96 0.00 422.962.000101249,000.00740367HP5 0.00 248,000.001214248,000.00 2.000UNTDCU 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00910160AH3 0.00 248,000.001215248,000.00 2.000WSHFED 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00938828BH2 0.00 249,000.001216249,000.00 1.9501STIER 412.38 0.00 412.381.950101249,000.0033766LAJ7 0.00 244,000.001218244,000.00 1.950RAYJAM 404.10 0.00 404.101.950101244,000.0075472RAD3 0.00 245,000.001219245,000.00 1.900CITBNK 395.35 0.00 395.351.900101245,000.0012556LBA3 0.00 248,000.001220248,000.00 1.850CELTIC 389.67 0.00 389.671.850101248,000.0015118RRH2 0.00 249,000.001221249,000.00 1.8501STNBS 391.24 0.00 391.241.850101249,000.00334342CD2 0.00 248,000.001222248,000.00 1.8001STDQN 379.13 0.00 379.131.800101248,000.00336460CX6 0.00 245,000.001225245,000.00 1.600LUANA 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.00549104JN8 0.00 3,585,673.4112283,585,673.41BOTW 0.01 0.00 0.011011,671,857.56059731851 0.00 248,000.001227248,000.00 1.700BNKWST 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0006652CHB0 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:40 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.176 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 5 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest August 1, 2020 - August 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 10,615,259.76123010,615,259.76PARS 0.00 0.00 0.0010110,481,313.32SYS1230 0.00 248,000.001231248,000.00 1.7001STSER 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0033640VDD7 0.00 248,000.001235248,000.00 1.700SAUKVL 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.00804375DL4 0.00 248,000.001238248,000.00 1.800LIVEOK 379.13 0.00 379.131.800101248,000.00538036GV0 0.00 248,000.001239248,000.00 1.900KERNCU 400.20 0.00 400.201.900101248,000.0049228XAK6 0.00 248,000.001240248,000.00 1.850SF FCU 389.67 0.00 389.671.850101248,000.0079772FAC0 0.00 248,000.001244248,000.00 1.900WFNBW 400.20 0.00 400.201.900101248,000.00949495AT2 0.00 248,000.001248248,000.00 1.550FRDMFI 326.48 0.00 326.481.550101248,000.0035637RDC8 0.00 248,000.001249248,000.00 1.650UNTDCM 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0090983WBT7 0.00 248,000.001250248,000.00 1.6501STNMI 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0032114VBT3 0.00 245,000.001251245,000.00 1.650RLLSTN 343.34 0.00 343.341.650101245,000.0077579ADF0 0.00 248,000.001252248,000.00 1.650CITADL 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0017286TAG0 0.00 245,000.001253245,000.00 1.600SYNOVS 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.0087164DRD4 0.00 248,000.001254248,000.00 1.600SERVIS 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.0081768PAF3 0.00 248,000.001255248,000.00 1.600AMERST 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.00029728BC5 0.00 248,000.001256248,000.00 1.600ACCSS 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.0000435JBH5 0.00 248,000.001257248,000.00 1.500SPRING 315.95 0.00 315.951.500101248,000.00849430BF9 0.00 248,000.001258248,000.00 1.650AXOS 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0005465DAE8 0.00 245,000.001259245,000.00 1.200CADNCE 249.70 0.00 249.701.200101245,000.0012738RFX7 0.00 245,000.001260245,000.00 1.100TEXAS 228.89 0.00 228.891.100101245,000.00882213AB7 0.00 248,000.001261248,000.00 1.100SNTCLR 231.69 0.00 231.691.100101248,000.0006424KBC3 0.00 248,000.001262248,000.00 1.350TRIAD 284.35 0.00 284.351.350101248,000.0089579NCD3 0.00 248,000.001263248,000.00 1.150NRTHSR 242.22 0.00 242.221.150101248,000.0066704MEQ0 0.00 248,000.001264248,000.00 1.300BELLCO 273.82 0.00 273.821.300101248,000.0007833EAD9 0.00 248,000.001265248,000.00 1.150WESTMI 242.22 0.00 242.221.150101248,000.00954444BS3 0.00 248,000.001266248,000.00 1.400NCOLET 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.00654062JZ2 0.00 248,000.001267248,000.00 1.400ALMABK 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.00020080BX4 0.00 248,000.001268248,000.00 1.250CMWBUS 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.002027506M2 0.00 245,000.001269245,000.00 1.300PACWST 270.51 0.00 270.511.300101245,000.0069506YRH4 0.00 248,000.001270248,000.00 1.250BELB&T 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.0008016PDQ9 0.00 248,000.001272248,000.00 1.250THEJEF 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.00472382AQ3 0.00 249,000.001273249,000.00 1.2001STFDM 253.78 0.00 253.781.200101249,000.0032027BAL1 0.00 248,000.001274248,000.00 1.3501STMCG 284.35 0.00 284.351.350101248,000.0032112UDR9 0.00 248,000.001276248,000.00 1.250FLGSTR 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.0033847E3A3 0.00 245,000.001277245,000.00 1.000WSTRNS 208.08 0.00 208.081.000101245,000.0095960NKD8 0.00 248,000.001278248,000.00 1.0001STINT 210.63 0.00 210.631.000101248,000.0032056GDJ6 0.00 248,000.001284248,000.00 0.600CHIPVA 126.38 0.00 126.380.600101248,000.00169894AS1 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:40 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.177 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 6 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest August 1, 2020 - August 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001285248,000.00 0.350AMR1ST 73.72 0.00 73.720.350101248,000.0002616AAH2 0.00 248,000.001286248,000.00 0.500STHRNB 105.32 0.00 105.320.500101248,000.0084223QAN7 0.00 248,000.001287248,000.00 0.500BKPRNC 105.32 0.00 105.320.500101248,000.00064520BG3 0.00 136,746,482.17Subtotal 136,561,169.53 1.208 152,708.930.00138,508.93148,680,137.07 14,200.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 13,302,075.08105813,302,075.08USBANK 0.02 0.00 0.020.0042315,360.92SYS1058 0.00 13,302,075.08Subtotal 13,302,075.08 0.004 0.020.000.025,360.92 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 239,433.721062239,433.72LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241223,898.00SYS1062 0.00 239,433.72Subtotal 239,433.72 0.000.000.00223,898.00 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 16,510,033.50111316,510,033.50 0.784LAIF 11,819.80 0.00 11,819.800.84324916,510,033.5025-33-005 0.00 16,510,033.50Subtotal 16,510,033.50 0.843 11,819.800.0011,819.8016,510,033.50 0.00 166,798,024.47Total 166,612,711.83 1.170 164,528.750.00150,328.75165,419,429.49 14,200.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:40 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.178 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management September 30, 2020 City of La Quinta - Portfolio Summary % of Portfolio Book ValueInvestmentsMarket Value Par Value Days to MaturityTerm YTM 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 7,258,701.77 14.71 0.00017,258,701.777,258,701.77 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 54,144,117.99 135.15 0.685154,480,465.1954,144,117.99 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 16,510,033.50 110.72 0.685116,592,317.5116,510,033.50 Money Market/Mutual Funds 24,581.74 10.02 0.000124,581.7424,581.74 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 2,852,973.07 11.85 0.27012,852,973.072,852,973.07 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 15,014,892.36 1,6009.75 1.3201,29715,428,606.0015,050,000.00 Treasury Coupon Securities 9,911,735.00 1,6536.43 1.50649910,167,680.0010,000,000.00 Certificate of Deposits 33,684,000.00 1,55021.87 2.16397235,299,985.9633,684,000.00 Corporate Notes 2,341,260.00 1,4361.52 2.7256832,475,568.002,400,000.00 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 29.27 10.00 0.000129.2729.27 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1,785,913.46 11.16 0.00011,785,913.461,785,913.46 PARS Pension Trust 10,503,569.92 16.82 0.000110,503,569.9210,503,569.92 154,031,808.08 100.00%Investments 156,870,391.89154,213,920.72 624 382 1.059 Current Year September 30 144,504.76 Fiscal Year To Date 465,781.83 Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 165,656,795.97 163,934,640.44 1.13%1.06% Total Earnings Month Ending I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. __________________________________________________ ____________________ Karla Romero, Finance Director Portfolio CITY CP Reporting period 09/01/2020-09/30/2020 Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:33 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 December 8, 2020 79 Days toMaturityPage 1Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueSeptember 30, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateBank Accounts1Bank of New York1293-35,016.83 -35,016.8309/01/2020 -35,016.83 1SYS12930.0001Bank of the West12286,686,529.78 6,686,529.7808/20/2019 6,686,529.78 10597318510.0001City Petty Cash10593,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS10590.0001La Quinta Palms Realty1062253,410.60 253,410.6007/01/2016 253,410.60 1SYS10620.0001Stifel, Nicolaus & Company11833.65 3.6503/18/2019 3.65 1SYS11830.0001Wells Fargo1057350,474.57 350,474.5707/01/2016 350,474.57 141592824820.0007,258,701.7717,258,701.777,258,701.774,527,283.83Subtotal and Average1 0.000Local Agency Investment Fund-City1Local Agency Inv Fund105554,144,117.99 54,144,117.99 0.68554,480,465.19 198-33-4340.68554,144,117.99154,480,465.1954,144,117.9955,294,117.99Subtotal and Average1 0.685Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing1Local Agency Inv Fund111316,510,033.50 16,510,033.50 0.68516,592,317.51 125-33-0050.68516,510,033.50116,592,317.5116,510,033.5016,510,033.50Subtotal and Average1 0.685Money Market/Mutual Funds1Dreyfus129424,581.74 24,581.7409/24/2020 24,581.74 1X9USDDTP30.00024,581.74124,581.7424,581.741,432.85Subtotal and Average1 0.000Money Market Accounts - CAMP1California Asset Management Pr11532,852,973.07 2,852,973.07 0.27009/26/2018 2,852,973.07 1SYS11530.2702,852,973.0712,852,973.072,852,973.072,852,353.54Subtotal and Average1 0.270Federal Agency Coupon Securities335Federal Farm Credit Bank11051,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 1,014,110.00 1,3923133EHWM11.913705Federal National Mtg Assn12331,000,000.00 992,100.00 09/06/20221.37510/29/2019 1,023,470.00 1,0433135G0W331.659728Federal Farm Credit Bank12471,000,000.00 999,217.36 09/29/20221.40002/05/2020 1,024,430.00 9673133EGWJ01.430802Federal Farm Credit Bank1198500,000.00 499,500.00 12/12/20221.87506/20/2019 518,550.00 1,2713133EKQP41.9051,047Federal Farm Credit Bank1223500,000.00 499,400.00 08/14/20231.60009/12/2019 519,630.00 1,4323133EKZK51.6321,069Federal Farm Credit Bank1158250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 268,740.00 1,7863133EJYL73.0411,126Federal Farm Credit Bank12341,000,000.00 996,900.00 11/01/20231.60011/01/2019 1,041,840.00 1,4613133EK4X11.6801,230Federal Home Loan Bank1177500,000.00 498,550.00 02/13/20242.50003/01/2019 537,800.00 1,8103130AFW942.5631,231Federal Farm Credit Bank12461,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/14/20241.43002/14/2020 1,039,390.00 1,4613133ELNE01.4561,370Federal National Mtg Assn1206500,000.00 495,950.00 07/02/20241.75007/15/2019 527,720.00 1,8143135G0V751.922Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:33PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0Report Ver. 7.3.6.180 Days toMaturityPage 2Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueSeptember 30, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateFederal Agency Coupon Securities1,394Federal Farm Credit Bank1212500,000.00 499,500.00 07/26/20241.85008/02/2019 529,850.00 1,8203133EKWV41.8711,447Federal Farm Credit Bank1224500,000.00 498,750.00 09/17/20241.60009/17/2019 525,650.00 1,8273133EKP751.6521,447Federal Farm Credit Bank12421,000,000.00 998,600.00 09/17/20241.70012/17/2019 1,055,240.00 1,7363133ELEA81.7311,663Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp12751,000,000.00 998,500.00 04/21/20250.70004/28/2020 1,000,610.00 1,8193134GVLC00.7311,699Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp12791,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 05/27/20250.62505/27/2020 1,001,490.00 1,8263134GVYG70.6251,712Federal Farm Credit Bank1280500,000.00 499,850.00 06/09/20250.50006/09/2020 502,175.00 1,8263133ELH230.5061,713Federal Farm Credit Bank1282500,000.00 500,000.00 06/10/20250.68006/10/2020 500,900.00 1,8263133ELH800.6801,716Federal Home Loan Bank1281500,000.00 499,850.00 06/13/20250.50006/03/2020 503,290.00 1,8363130AJKW80.5061,733Federal Home Loan Bank1283300,000.00 300,000.00 06/30/20250.68006/30/2020 296,811.00 1,8263130AJRP60.6801,778Federal National Mtg Assn1288500,000.00 500,000.00 08/14/20250.50008/14/2020 499,255.00 1,8263135G05S80.5001,782Federal National Mtg Assn1290500,000.00 499,750.00 08/18/20250.52008/28/2020 499,595.00 1,8163136G4M750.5301,785Federal National Mtg Assn12891,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 08/21/20250.56008/21/2020 998,060.00 1,8263136G4N740.56015,014,892.361,60015,428,606.0015,050,000.0015,347,159.03Subtotal and Average1,297 1.320Treasury Coupon Securities242U.S. Treasury1193500,000.00 493,610.00 05/31/20211.37505/31/2019 504,220.00 731912828R772.030272U.S. Treasury10455,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 5,037,500.00 1,808912828S271.125395U.S. Treasury10702,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 2,024,220.00 1,679912828T671.903591U.S. Treasury1192500,000.00 496,650.00 05/15/20221.75005/31/2019 513,125.00 1,080912828SV31.984729U.S. Treasury1178500,000.00 489,687.50 09/30/20221.87503/01/2019 517,405.00 1,3099128282W92.4801,094U.S. Treasury1217500,000.00 499,300.00 09/30/20231.37508/21/2019 518,240.00 1,501912828T261.4101,521U.S. Treasury12411,000,000.00 989,687.50 11/30/20241.50012/16/2019 1,052,970.00 1,811912828YV61.7189,911,735.001,65310,167,680.0010,000,000.009,911,735.00Subtotal and Average499 1.506Certificate of Deposits18First Tech Federal Credit Unio1124245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20202.70004/18/2018 245,331.00 91533715LBJ82.62353First Bank Richmond1081245,000.00 245,000.00 11/23/20201.80006/21/2017 245,609.58 1,251319267GC81.80282Freedom Credit Union1111245,000.00 245,000.00 12/22/20202.05012/22/2017 246,072.39 1,09635638BAA92.052105Bankers Bank1086240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 241,144.39 1,28006610RAP41.804109Farm Bureau Bank1165248,000.00 248,000.00 01/18/20213.00012/17/2018 250,136.17 763307660LC22.898111Eagle Bank1146245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 247,034.41 91527002YDV52.858123Infinty FCU1211248,000.00 248,000.00 02/01/20212.10007/31/2019 249,613.76 55145667EDY12.110144Comenity Capital Bank1009240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 241,439.59 1,82720033APG51.702158Ally Bank Midvale1176245,000.00 245,000.00 03/08/20212.50003/07/2019 247,453.45 73202007GHX42.016166Unity Bank1120245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 247,635.07 1,09691330ABN62.552200Amex Centurion1077240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 242,676.26 1,46102587DP852.252Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:33PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.081 Days toMaturityPage 3Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueSeptember 30, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits211Towne Bank1128240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 243,580.13 1,09689214PBL22.803237PrivateBank & Trust1032240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016 241,959.38 1,82674267GVG91.501249Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082240,000.00 240,000.00 06/07/20212.25006/07/2017 243,282.36 1,46114042RGD72.252286Central State Bank1085240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20211.85007/14/2017 242,980.97 1,46115523RBJ41.851319General Electric Credit Union1150240,000.00 240,000.00 08/16/20213.10008/15/2018 245,936.52 1,097369674AV83.100361New York Community Bank1226245,000.00 245,000.00 09/27/20211.80009/27/2019 248,595.06 731649447TC31.802390Northpointe Bank1127240,000.00 240,000.00 10/26/20212.70004/26/2018 246,086.76 1,279666613GV02.703412First Source Bank1168245,000.00 245,000.00 11/17/20213.15012/17/2018 252,852.20 1,06633646CKP83.153417Belmont Savings Bank1102245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 249,973.16 1,462080515CD92.101417TNB Bank1187248,000.00 248,000.00 11/22/20212.40005/22/2019 253,896.05 91587266AAA12.407446Neighbors FCU1167245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20213.20012/21/2018 253,686.06 1,09664017AAQ73.203447United Credit Union1214248,000.00 248,000.00 12/22/20212.00008/22/2019 253,124.00 853910160AH32.003475The Ohio Valley Bank1089240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017244,986.581,645677721CN01.903487Third Federal Savings and Loan1112245,000.00245,000.0001/31/20222.50001/30/2018252,282.091,46288413QBY32.502488Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066240,000.00240,000.0002/01/20222.25002/01/2017246,295.661,8262546722U12.251511BMW Bank1067240,000.00240,000.0002/24/20222.20002/24/2017246,421.151,82605580AGK42.201515Maine Savings FCU1171248,000.00248,000.0002/28/20223.30012/28/2018258,592.601,158560507AK13.306533Luana Savings Bank1225245,000.00245,000.0003/18/20221.60009/18/2019249,706.57912549104JN81.599545Bellco Credit Union1264248,000.00248,000.0003/30/20221.30003/31/2020251,793.9372907833EAD91.300546Cadence Bank, NA1259245,000.00245,000.0003/31/20221.20003/31/2020248,426.3773012738RFX71.200546Bank of Santa Clarita1261248,000.00248,000.0003/31/20221.10003/31/2020251,094.3773006424KBC31.100572Goldman Sachs1078240,000.00240,000.0004/26/20222.40004/26/2017248,039.331,82638148PJK42.401575Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126240,000.00240,000.0004/29/20222.80004/30/2018249,618.821,46030960QAG22.802593Kansas State Bank1101245,000.00245,000.0005/17/20222.10011/17/2017252,351.791,64250116CBE82.099609Synchrony Bank Retail1080240,000.00240,000.0006/02/20222.40006/02/2017248,656.581,82687164XQV12.401615PCSB Bank1149245,000.00245,000.0006/08/20223.00006/08/2018256,438.491,46169324MAD73.002616Synovus Bank1253245,000.00245,000.0006/09/20221.60003/09/2020250,588.8782287164DRD41.602620Allegiance Bank1143245,000.00245,000.0006/13/20223.10006/13/2018256,945.391,46101748DBE53.102628Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083240,000.00240,000.0006/21/20222.35006/21/2017248,716.511,826795450A702.351635America's Credit Union1200248,000.00248,000.0006/28/20222.30006/28/2019256,894.171,09603065AAL72.302676Traditions Bank1148245,000.00245,000.0008/08/20223.00006/08/2018257,676.911,52289269CBX93.002691CIT Bank NA1219245,000.00245,000.0008/23/20221.90008/23/2019252,785.101,09612556LBA31.902697American Express Fed Savings B1096240,000.00240,000.0008/29/20222.40008/29/2017250,011.961,82602587CFU92.402697Sterling Bank1201245,000.00245,000.0008/29/20222.15006/28/2019254,036.511,15885916VDC62.153742Alliance Credit Union1095245,000.00245,000.0010/13/20222.25010/13/2017255,246.021,82601859BAA32.251754Barclays Bank1097240,000.00240,000.0010/25/20222.30010/25/2017250,449.531,82606740KLJ42.291Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:33PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.082 Days toMaturityPage 4Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueSeptember 30, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits757Merrick Bank1163248,000.00 248,000.00 10/28/20223.25010/30/2018 263,794.70 1,45959013J4K23.252768Mountain America Federal CU1099245,000.00 245,000.00 11/08/20222.30011/08/2017 255,864.40 1,82662384RAC02.301778CrossFirst Bank1106245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20222.20011/20/2017 255,476.49 1,82422766ACB92.201788Enterprise Bank, NA1107245,000.00 245,000.00 11/28/20222.15011/28/2017 255,342.87 1,82629367QCP12.151797Medallion Bank1169248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.40012/07/2018 265,431.65 1,46158404DCX73.402797Red Rocks Credit Union1166248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.35012/07/2018 265,157.48 1,46175701LAB33.352819Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110245,000.00 245,000.00 12/29/20222.40012/29/2017 257,128.33 1,826499724AB82.401820Kern FCU1239248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.90012/30/2019 257,465.52 1,09649228XAK61.902820San Francisco FCU1240248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.85012/30/2019 257,183.49 1,09679772FAC01.852851Wells Fargo Natl Bank West1244248,000.00 248,000.00 01/30/20231.90001/29/2020 257,810.04 1,097949495AT21.900873Servisfirst Bank1254248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20231.60002/21/2020 256,261.48 1,09681768PAF31.601880Verus Bank of Commerce1180248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20232.70002/28/2019 262,984.58 1,46192535LCD42.700902Aneca Federal Credit Union1119245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018260,764.481,826034577AH92.802911Northstar Bank1263248,000.00248,000.0003/31/20231.15003/31/2020253,769.031,09566704MEQ01.150911West Michigan Cmnty Bk1265248,000.00248,000.0003/31/20231.15003/31/2020253,769.031,095954444BS31.150922Citibank NA1123245,000.00245,000.0004/11/20232.90004/11/2018261,732.031,82617312QJ262.902939Congressional Bank1189248,000.00248,000.0004/28/20232.50004/30/2019262,673.991,45920726ABA52.502939EnerBank USA1125240,000.00240,000.0004/28/20232.95004/30/2018257,012.041,82429278TAY62.952946First National Bank1179248,000.00248,000.0005/05/20232.80003/05/2019264,720.611,52232117BCX42.802956University of Iowa Comm. CU1134240,000.00240,000.0005/15/20233.05005/14/2018257,941.561,82791435LAG23.052979Pittsfield Cooperative Bank1194245,000.00245,000.0006/07/20232.50006/07/2019260,083.111,461725404AB32.502992Morton Community1173248,000.00248,000.0006/20/20232.75003/20/2019265,182.231,553619165JD62.753992RCB Bank1144245,000.00245,000.0006/20/20233.15006/20/2018264,668.721,82674934YAH43.152998American First CU1285248,000.00248,000.0006/26/20230.35006/26/2020248,823.141,09502616AAH20.3501,021American National Bank1205248,000.00248,000.0007/19/20232.00007/19/2019260,405.381,46102772JBD12.0011,022First National Bank of America1147245,000.00245,000.0007/20/20233.15007/20/2018265,246.561,82632110YLK93.1521,033Bank of New England1151249,000.00249,000.0007/31/20233.25007/31/2018270,488.051,82606426KAN83.2521,056Raymond James Bank1218244,000.00244,000.0008/23/20231.95008/23/2019256,251.321,46175472RAD31.9511,093Triad Bank1262248,000.00248,000.0009/29/20231.35003/30/2020256,372.371,27889579NCD31.3521,111Marlin Business Bank1155248,000.00248,000.0010/17/20233.30010/17/2018271,375.911,82657116ARV23.3021,111Municipal Trust and Savings1160245,000.00245,000.0010/17/20233.20010/17/2018267,339.201,826625925AR33.2021,111UBS Bank USA1161245,000.00245,000.0010/17/20233.35010/17/2018268,470.121,82690348JEJ53.3521,113Jefferson Financial CU1154245,000.00245,000.0010/19/20233.35010/19/2018268,500.231,826474067AQ83.3521,140Commercial Bank1162248,000.00248,000.0011/15/20233.40011/15/2018272,741.551,82620143PDV93.4021,153Numerica Credit Union1164248,000.00248,000.0011/28/20233.55011/28/2018274,210.151,82667054NAN33.5521,176National Cooperative Bank, N.A1170245,000.00245,000.0012/21/20233.40012/21/2018270,163.241,826635573AL23.402Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:33PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.083 Days toMaturityPage 5Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueSeptember 30, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits1,184Bar Harbor Bank and Trust1172248,000.00 248,000.00 12/29/20233.35012/31/2018 273,251.16 1,824066851WJ13.3521,215Lakeside Bank1208248,000.00 248,000.00 01/29/20242.00007/30/2019 262,622.08 1,64451210SQU42.0031,229Rollstone B&T1251245,000.00 245,000.00 02/12/20241.65002/12/2020 256,653.03 1,46177579ADF01.6511,230Northwest Bank1181248,000.00 248,000.00 02/13/20242.95002/13/2019 270,787.75 1,82666736ABP32.9511,244Wells Fargo1174248,000.00 248,000.00 02/27/20243.00002/27/2019 271,472.73 1,826949763XY73.0011,274Texas Bank Financial1260245,000.00 245,000.00 03/28/20241.10003/31/2020 252,303.21 1,458882213AB71.1011,292The Jefferson Bank1272248,000.00 248,000.00 04/15/20241.25004/15/2020 256,794.30 1,461472382AQ31.2511,293Belmont Bank and Trust1270248,000.00 248,000.00 04/16/20241.25004/16/2020 256,801.07 1,46108016PDQ91.2511,293Pacific Western Bank1269245,000.00 245,000.00 04/16/20241.30004/16/2020 254,127.79 1,46169506YRH41.3011,303Main Street Bank1188248,000.00 248,000.00 04/26/20242.60004/26/2019 268,938.17 1,82756065GAG32.6031,322First Service Bank1231248,000.00 248,000.00 05/15/20241.70011/15/2019 261,050.90 1,64333640VDD71.7011,323JP Morgan Chase1185245,000.00 245,000.00 05/16/20243.25005/16/2019 271,794.69 1,82748128HXU73.2541,330Iowa State Bank1186245,000.00 245,000.00 05/23/20242.40005/23/2019264,269.151,82746256YAZ22.4031,335Live Oak Bank1238248,000.00248,000.0005/28/20241.80011/27/2019262,094.341,644538036GV01.8021,336Century Next Bank1184248,000.00248,000.0005/29/20242.50005/29/2019268,520.311,827156634AK32.5031,345Plains Commerce Bank1195245,000.00245,000.0006/07/20242.55006/07/2019265,813.411,82772651LCL62.5531,350Evansville Teachers Credit FCU1196248,000.00248,000.0006/12/20242.60006/12/2019269,621.461,827299547AQ22.6031,357Legacy Bank1197248,000.00248,000.0006/19/20242.40006/19/2019267,871.451,827524661CB92.4031,359Citizens State Bank1199248,000.00248,000.0006/21/20242.40006/21/2019267,900.561,827176688CP22.4031,366Communitywide FCU1202248,000.00248,000.0006/28/20242.25006/28/2019266,597.151,82720416TAQ52.2531,366Revere Bank1203247,000.00247,000.0006/28/20242.30006/28/2019265,977.601,827761402BY12.3031,394Abacus Federal Savings1207248,000.00248,000.0007/26/20241.95007/26/2019264,078.561,82700257TBD71.9521,398First Security Bank of WA1209248,000.00248,000.0007/30/20242.00007/30/2019264,564.091,82733625CCP22.0021,399People's Bank1210248,000.00248,000.0007/31/20242.00007/31/2019264,546.111,827710571DS62.0021,415Preferred Bank1213249,000.00249,000.0008/16/20242.00008/16/2019265,831.881,827740367HP52.0021,422FirsTier Bank1216249,000.00249,000.0008/23/20241.95008/23/2019265,425.211,82733766LAJ71.9521,422Washington Federal1215248,000.00248,000.0008/23/20242.00008/23/2019264,846.711,827938828BH22.0021,429First State Bk DeQueen1222248,000.00248,000.0008/30/20241.80008/30/2019262,939.471,827336460CX61.8021,429First Natl Bk of Syracuse1221249,000.00249,000.0008/30/20241.85008/30/2019264,491.491,827334342CD21.8521,429Celtic Bank1220248,000.00248,000.0008/30/20241.85008/30/2019263,429.271,82715118RRH21.8521,457BankWest Inc1227248,000.00248,000.0009/27/20241.70009/27/2019262,231.631,82706652CHB01.7021,485Southern Bancorp Bk1286248,000.00248,000.0010/25/20240.50006/26/2020250,249.111,58284223QAN70.5001,498Sauk Valley B&T Co1235248,000.00248,000.0011/07/20241.70011/07/2019262,534.391,827804375DL41.7021,511Morgan Stanley Bank1237245,000.00245,000.0011/20/20241.95011/20/2019262,028.701,82761690UNX41.9521,511Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1236245,000.00245,000.0011/20/20241.90011/20/2019261,517.631,82761760A3B31.9021,551Bank Princeton1287248,000.00248,000.0012/30/20240.50006/30/2020250,177.611,644064520BG30.500Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:33PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.084 Days toMaturityPage 6Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueSeptember 30, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDateCertificate of Deposits1,590United Community1249248,000.00 248,000.00 02/07/20251.65002/07/2020 262,696.78 1,82790983WBT71.6521,597First National Bank Michigan1250248,000.00 248,000.00 02/14/20251.65002/14/2020 262,761.01 1,82732114VBT31.6521,597Freedom Financial1248248,000.00 248,000.00 02/14/20251.55002/14/2020 261,667.60 1,82735637RDC81.5521,604American State1255248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20251.60002/21/2020 262,276.17 1,827029728BC51.6021,610Citadel FCU1252248,000.00 248,000.00 02/27/20251.65002/27/2020 262,880.30 1,82717286TAG01.6521,624Access Bank1256248,000.00 248,000.00 03/13/20251.60003/13/2020 262,384.17 1,82600435JBH51.6011,631Spring Bank1257248,000.00 248,000.00 03/20/20251.50003/20/2020 261,329.36 1,826849430BF91.5011,637Axos Bank1258248,000.00 248,000.00 03/26/20251.65003/26/2020 263,058.66 1,82605465DAE81.6511,639Alma Bank1267248,000.00 248,000.00 03/28/20251.40003/30/2020 260,272.45 1,824020080BX41.3991,642Commonwealth Business Bk1268248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.25003/31/2020 258,494.17 1,8262027506M21.2511,642Nicolet Natl Bank1266248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.40003/31/2020 260,179.53 1,826654062JZ21.4011,650Capital One USA FDIC339541271245,000.00 245,000.00 04/08/20251.60004/08/2020 259,369.05 1,82614042TDD61.6011,670Firrst Natl Bk McGregor1274248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20251.35004/28/2020259,872.801,82632112UDR91.3511,671First Freedom Bank1273249,000.00249,000.0004/29/20251.20004/29/2020259,205.761,82632027BAL11.2011,672Flagstar1276248,000.00248,000.0004/30/20251.25004/30/2020258,677.091,82633847E3A31.2511,6841st Internet Bank1278248,000.00248,000.0005/12/20251.00005/11/2020255,880.251,82732056GDJ60.9851,685Western State Bank1277245,000.00245,000.0005/13/20251.00005/13/2020252,784.121,82695960NKD81.0011,727Chippewa Valley Bk1284248,000.00248,000.0006/24/20250.60006/24/2020251,283.421,826169894AS10.60033,684,000.001,55035,299,985.9633,684,000.0033,684,000.00Subtotal and Average972 2.163Corporate Notes307Apple Inc1079500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 504,805.00 1,514037833CC21.900493Proctor and Gamble1159500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 514,265.00 1,210742718DY23.071805Wal-Mart Stores, Inc1190500,000.00 496,650.00 12/15/20222.35004/16/2019 521,595.00 1,339931142DU42.799853Colgate-Palmolive1175500,000.00 485,250.00 02/01/20231.95003/04/2019 517,255.00 1,43019416QEA42.7511,041Microsoft Corporation1157400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 417,648.00 1,758594918BQ63.2222,341,260.001,4362,475,568.002,400,000.002,341,260.00Subtotal and Average683 2.725Money Market with Fiscal Agent1US Bank105829.27 29.2707/01/2016 29.27 1SYS10580.00029.27129.2729.2712,858,673.55Subtotal and Average1 0.000CERBT - OPEB Trust1CalPERS CERBT Plan11141,785,913.46 1,785,913.4607/01/2020 1,785,913.46 1SYS11140.0001,785,913.4611,785,913.461,785,913.461,717,209.91Subtotal and Average1 0.000Portfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:33PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.085 Days toMaturityPage 7Par ValueBook ValueMaturityDateStatedRateMarket ValueSeptember 30, 2020Portfolio Details - InvestmentsAverageBalanceIssuerPortfolio ManagementCity of La QuintaYTM365TermCUSIP Investment #PurchaseDatePARS Pension Trust1Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Serv123010,503,569.92 10,503,569.9207/01/2020 10,503,569.92 1SYS12300.00010,503,569.92110,503,569.9210,503,569.9210,611,536.77Subtotal and Average1 0.000624165,656,795.97 154,213,920.72382 1.059156,870,391.89 154,031,808.08Total and AveragePortfolio CITYCPRun Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:33PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.086 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund September 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 1,000,000.0012891,000,000.00 0.560FNMA 466.66 0.00 466.660.5681011,000,000.003136G4N74 0.00 500,000.001288500,000.00 0.500FNMA 208.33 0.00 208.330.507101500,000.003135G05S8 0.00 499,750.001290500,000.00 0.520FNMA 216.67 0.00 216.670.527101499,750.003136G4M75 0.00 992,100.0012331,000,000.00 1.375FNMA 1,145.83 0.00 1,145.831.405101992,100.003135G0W33 0.00 495,950.001206500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.16 0.00 729.161.789101495,950.003135G0V75 0.00 1,000,000.0012791,000,000.00 0.625FHLMC 520.84 0.00 520.840.6341011,000,000.003134GVYG7 0.00 998,500.0012751,000,000.00 0.700FHLMC 583.33 0.00 583.330.711101998,500.003134GVLC0 0.00 996,900.0012341,000,000.00 1.600FFCB 1,333.34 0.00 1,333.341.627101996,900.003133EK4X1 0.00 499,500.001198500,000.00 1.875FFCB 781.25 0.00 781.251.903101499,500.003133EKQP4 0.00 498,750.001224500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.67 0.00 666.671.626101498,750.003133EKP75 0.00 998,600.0012421,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.726101998,600.003133ELEA8 0.00 499,400.001223500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.66 0.00 666.661.624101499,400.003133EKZK5 0.00 999,000.0012461,000,000.00 1.430FFCB 1,191.66 0.00 1,191.661.451101999,000.003133ELNE0 0.00 999,217.3612471,000,000.00 1.400FFCB 1,166.67 0.00 1,166.671.421101999,217.363133EGWJ0 0.00 499,850.001280500,000.00 0.500FFCB 208.34 0.00 208.340.507101499,850.003133ELH23 0.00 500,000.001282500,000.00 0.680FFCB 283.33 0.00 283.330.689101500,000.003133ELH80 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.737101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 499,500.001212500,000.00 1.850FFCB 770.83 0.00 770.831.878101499,500.003133EKWV4 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 583.34 0.00 583.342.870101247,275.003133EJYL7 0.00 300,000.001283300,000.00 0.680FHLB 170.00 0.00 170.000.689101300,000.003130AJRP6 0.00 499,850.001281500,000.00 0.500FHLB 208.33 0.00 208.330.507101499,850.003130AJKW8 0.00 498,550.001177500,000.00 2.500FHLB 1,041.67 0.00 1,041.672.542101498,550.003130AFW94 0.00 0.0011040.00 1.625FHLB 451.39 0.00 3,651.3913.370101996,800.003130A66T9 3,200.00 496,650.001192500,000.00 1.750USTR 713.32 0.00 713.321.747101496,650.00912828SV3 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,038.05 0.00 2,038.051.2761011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 499,300.001217500,000.00 1.375USTR 563.63 0.00 563.631.373101499,300.00912828T26 0.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,585.59 0.00 4,585.591.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 989,687.5012411,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,229.50 0.00 1,229.501.511101989,687.50912828YV6 0.00 493,610.001193500,000.00 1.375USTR 563.52 0.00 563.521.389101493,610.00912828R77 0.00 489,687.501178500,000.00 1.875USTR 768.59 0.00 768.591.910101489,687.509128282W9 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:45 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.187 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest September 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001174248,000.00 3.000WELLS 611.51 0.00 611.513.000101248,000.00949763XY7 0.00 350,474.571057350,474.57WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.01101196,958.014159282482 0.00 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 473.43 0.00 473.432.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 443.84 0.00 443.842.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 433.97 0.00 433.972.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 248,000.001169248,000.00 3.400MEDBA 693.04 0.00 693.043.400101248,000.0058404DCX7 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 453.70 0.00 453.702.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 503.42 0.00 503.422.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 662.47 0.00 662.473.250101248,000.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 552.33 0.00 552.332.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 248,000.001173248,000.00 2.750MORTN 560.55 0.00 560.552.750101248,000.00619165JD6 0.00 245,000.001271245,000.00 1.600CAPONE 322.19 0.00 322.191.600101245,000.0014042TDD6 0.00 245,000.001176245,000.00 2.500ALLY 503.42 0.00 503.422.500101245,000.0002007GHX4 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 335.34 0.00 335.341.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 295.89 0.00 295.891.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 54,144,117.99105554,144,117.99 0.685LAIF 38,467.48 0.00 38,467.480.84110155,644,117.9998-33-434 0.00 -35,016.831293-35,016.83BNY 0.01 0.00 0.01***.***101 0.00SYS1293 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 443.84 0.00 443.842.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.83 0.00 645.831.594101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 473.43 0.00 473.432.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 245,000.001081245,000.00 1.800RICHMN 362.46 0.00 362.461.800101245,000.00319267GC8 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 443.84 0.00 443.842.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 463.56 0.00 463.562.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 364.93 0.00 364.931.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 355.07 0.00 355.071.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 374.79 0.00 374.791.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 453.08 0.00 453.082.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 473.42 0.00 473.422.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 463.15 0.00 463.152.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 422.88 0.00 422.882.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 422.87 0.00 422.872.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 443.01 0.00 443.012.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 432.95 0.00 432.952.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001236245,000.00 1.900MSPRIV 382.60 0.00 382.601.900101245,000.0061760A3B3 0.00 245,000.001237245,000.00 1.950MORGST 392.67 0.00 392.671.950101245,000.0061690UNX4 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 483.29 0.00 483.292.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 245,000.001111245,000.00 2.050FREECU 412.81 0.00 412.812.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:45 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.188 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest September 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 1,785,913.4611141,785,913.46CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001011,714,840.82SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 666.67 0.00 666.672.144101378,360.00594918BQ6 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 563.83 0.00 563.832.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 513.49 0.00 513.492.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 583.97 0.00 583.972.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 245,000.001124245,000.00 2.7001STTCH 543.70 0.00 543.702.700101245,000.0033715LBJ8 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 581.92 0.00 581.922.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 552.33 0.00 552.332.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 532.60 0.00 532.602.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 601.64 0.00 601.643.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001226245,000.00 1.800NYCMBK 362.47 0.00 362.471.800101245,000.00649447TC3 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 624.24 0.00 624.243.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 634.32 0.00 634.323.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 573.90 0.00 573.902.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 634.32 0.00 634.323.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 604.11 0.00 604.113.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 604.11 0.00 604.113.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 611.51 0.00 611.513.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 665.14 0.00 665.143.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 2,852,973.0711532,852,973.07 0.270CAMP 640.89 0.00 640.890.2731012,852,332.18SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 674.59 0.00 674.593.350101245,000.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 672.66 0.00 672.663.300101248,000.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 958.33 0.00 958.332.390101487,950.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 644.38 0.00 644.383.200101245,000.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 674.59 0.00 674.593.350101245,000.0090348JEJ5 0.00 248,000.001162248,000.00 3.400COMMBK 693.04 0.00 693.043.400101248,000.0020143PDV9 0.00 248,000.001164248,000.00 3.550NMRCA 723.62 0.00 723.623.550101248,000.0067054NAN3 0.00 248,000.001165248,000.00 3.000FARMBU 611.51 0.00 611.513.000101248,000.00307660LC2 0.00 248,000.001166248,000.00 3.350REDRCK 682.85 0.00 682.853.350101248,000.0075701LAB3 0.00 245,000.001167245,000.00 3.200NEIGH 644.38 0.00 644.383.200101245,000.0064017AAQ7 0.00 245,000.001168245,000.00 3.1501STSRC 634.32 0.00 634.323.150101245,000.0033646CKP8 0.00 245,000.001170245,000.00 3.400NLCOOP 684.66 0.00 684.663.400101245,000.00635573AL2 0.00 248,000.001171248,000.00 3.300MAINE 672.65 0.00 672.653.300101248,000.00560507AK1 0.00 248,000.001172248,000.00 3.350BARHAR 682.85 0.00 682.853.350101248,000.00066851WJ1 0.00 485,250.001175500,000.00 1.950COLGTE 812.50 0.00 812.502.037101485,250.0019416QEA4 0.00 3.6511833.65STIFEL 3.65 0.00 3.651010.00SYS1183 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:45 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.189 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest September 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001179248,000.00 2.8001STNBK 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101248,000.0032117BCX4 0.00 248,000.001180248,000.00 2.700VERUS 550.35 0.00 550.352.700101248,000.0092535LCD4 0.00 248,000.001181248,000.00 2.950NRTHWS 601.32 0.00 601.322.950101248,000.0066736ABP3 0.00 248,000.001184248,000.00 2.500CENTNX 509.60 0.00 509.602.500101248,000.00156634AK3 0.00 245,000.001185245,000.00 3.250JPMORG 654.45 0.00 654.453.250101245,000.0048128HXU7 0.00 245,000.001186245,000.00 2.400IOWAST 483.28 0.00 483.282.400101245,000.0046256YAZ2 0.00 248,000.001187248,000.00 2.400TSCOLA 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101248,000.0087266AAA1 0.00 248,000.001188248,000.00 2.600MAINST 529.97 0.00 529.972.600101248,000.0056065GAG3 0.00 248,000.001189248,000.00 2.500CONGRS 509.59 0.00 509.592.500101248,000.0020726ABA5 0.00 496,650.001190500,000.00 2.350WALMRT 979.16 0.00 979.162.399101496,650.00931142DU4 0.00 245,000.001194245,000.00 2.500PITTS 503.43 0.00 503.432.500101245,000.00725404AB3 0.00 245,000.001195245,000.00 2.550PLAINS 513.50 0.00 513.502.550101245,000.0072651LCL6 0.00 248,000.001196248,000.00 2.600EVNSCU 529.97 0.00 529.972.600101248,000.00299547AQ2 0.00 248,000.001197248,000.00 2.400LEGCY 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101248,000.00524661CB9 0.00 248,000.001199248,000.00 2.400CTZNST 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101248,000.00176688CP2 0.00 248,000.001200248,000.00 2.300AMERCU 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101248,000.0003065AAL7 0.00 245,000.001201245,000.00 2.150STRLNG 432.95 0.00 432.952.150101245,000.0085916VDC6 0.00 248,000.001202248,000.00 2.250COMMW 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101248,000.0020416TAQ5 0.00 247,000.001203247,000.00 2.300REVER 466.94 0.00 466.942.300101247,000.00761402BY1 0.00 248,000.001205248,000.00 2.000AMRNTL 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.0002772JBD1 0.00 248,000.001207248,000.00 1.950ABACUS 397.48 0.00 397.481.950101248,000.0000257TBD7 0.00 248,000.001208248,000.00 2.000LKSIDE 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.0051210SQU4 0.00 248,000.001209248,000.00 2.0001STSEC 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.0033625CCP2 0.00 248,000.001210248,000.00 2.000PEOPLE 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.00710571DS6 0.00 248,000.001211248,000.00 2.100NFNITY 428.05 0.00 428.052.100101248,000.0045667EDY1 0.00 249,000.001213249,000.00 2.000PREFRD 409.32 0.00 409.322.000101249,000.00740367HP5 0.00 248,000.001214248,000.00 2.000UNTDCU 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.00910160AH3 0.00 248,000.001215248,000.00 2.000WSHFED 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.00938828BH2 0.00 249,000.001216249,000.00 1.9501STIER 399.08 0.00 399.081.950101249,000.0033766LAJ7 0.00 244,000.001218244,000.00 1.950RAYJAM 391.07 0.00 391.071.950101244,000.0075472RAD3 0.00 245,000.001219245,000.00 1.900CITBNK 382.60 0.00 382.601.900101245,000.0012556LBA3 0.00 248,000.001220248,000.00 1.850CELTIC 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101248,000.0015118RRH2 0.00 249,000.001221249,000.00 1.8501STNBS 378.62 0.00 378.621.850101249,000.00334342CD2 0.00 248,000.001222248,000.00 1.8001STDQN 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101248,000.00336460CX6 0.00 245,000.001225245,000.00 1.600LUANA 322.20 0.00 322.201.600101245,000.00549104JN8 0.00 6,686,529.7812286,686,529.78BOTW 0.01 0.00 0.011013,585,673.41059731851 0.00 248,000.001227248,000.00 1.700BNKWST 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101248,000.0006652CHB0 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:45 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.190 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 5 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest September 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 10,503,569.92123010,503,569.92PARS 0.00 0.00 0.0010110,615,259.76SYS1230 0.00 248,000.001231248,000.00 1.7001STSER 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101248,000.0033640VDD7 0.00 248,000.001235248,000.00 1.700SAUKVL 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101248,000.00804375DL4 0.00 248,000.001238248,000.00 1.800LIVEOK 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101248,000.00538036GV0 0.00 248,000.001239248,000.00 1.900KERNCU 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101248,000.0049228XAK6 0.00 248,000.001240248,000.00 1.850SF FCU 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101248,000.0079772FAC0 0.00 248,000.001244248,000.00 1.900WFNBW 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101248,000.00949495AT2 0.00 248,000.001248248,000.00 1.550FRDMFI 315.95 0.00 315.951.550101248,000.0035637RDC8 0.00 248,000.001249248,000.00 1.650UNTDCM 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.0090983WBT7 0.00 248,000.001250248,000.00 1.6501STNMI 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.0032114VBT3 0.00 245,000.001251245,000.00 1.650RLLSTN 332.26 0.00 332.261.650101245,000.0077579ADF0 0.00 248,000.001252248,000.00 1.650CITADL 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.0017286TAG0 0.00 245,000.001253245,000.00 1.600SYNOVS 322.19 0.00 322.191.600101245,000.0087164DRD4 0.00 248,000.001254248,000.00 1.600SERVIS 326.14 0.00 326.141.600101248,000.0081768PAF3 0.00 248,000.001255248,000.00 1.600AMERST 326.14 0.00 326.141.600101248,000.00029728BC5 0.00 248,000.001256248,000.00 1.600ACCSS 326.14 0.00 326.141.600101248,000.0000435JBH5 0.00 248,000.001257248,000.00 1.500SPRING 305.76 0.00 305.761.500101248,000.00849430BF9 0.00 248,000.001258248,000.00 1.650AXOS 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.0005465DAE8 0.00 245,000.001259245,000.00 1.200CADNCE 241.64 0.00 241.641.200101245,000.0012738RFX7 0.00 245,000.001260245,000.00 1.100TEXAS 221.50 0.00 221.501.100101245,000.00882213AB7 0.00 248,000.001261248,000.00 1.100SNTCLR 224.22 0.00 224.221.100101248,000.0006424KBC3 0.00 248,000.001262248,000.00 1.350TRIAD 275.18 0.00 275.181.350101248,000.0089579NCD3 0.00 248,000.001263248,000.00 1.150NRTHSR 234.41 0.00 234.411.150101248,000.0066704MEQ0 0.00 248,000.001264248,000.00 1.300BELLCO 264.99 0.00 264.991.300101248,000.0007833EAD9 0.00 248,000.001265248,000.00 1.150WESTMI 234.41 0.00 234.411.150101248,000.00954444BS3 0.00 248,000.001266248,000.00 1.400NCOLET 285.37 0.00 285.371.400101248,000.00654062JZ2 0.00 248,000.001267248,000.00 1.400ALMABK 285.37 0.00 285.371.400101248,000.00020080BX4 0.00 248,000.001268248,000.00 1.250CMWBUS 254.79 0.00 254.791.250101248,000.002027506M2 0.00 245,000.001269245,000.00 1.300PACWST 261.78 0.00 261.781.300101245,000.0069506YRH4 0.00 248,000.001270248,000.00 1.250BELB&T 254.79 0.00 254.791.250101248,000.0008016PDQ9 0.00 248,000.001272248,000.00 1.250THEJEF 254.80 0.00 254.801.250101248,000.00472382AQ3 0.00 249,000.001273249,000.00 1.2001STFDM 245.60 0.00 245.601.200101249,000.0032027BAL1 0.00 248,000.001274248,000.00 1.3501STMCG 275.18 0.00 275.181.350101248,000.0032112UDR9 0.00 248,000.001276248,000.00 1.250FLGSTR 254.80 0.00 254.801.250101248,000.0033847E3A3 0.00 245,000.001277245,000.00 1.000WSTRNS 201.37 0.00 201.371.000101245,000.0095960NKD8 0.00 248,000.001278248,000.00 1.0001STINT 203.84 0.00 203.841.000101248,000.0032056GDJ6 0.00 248,000.001284248,000.00 0.600CHIPVA 122.30 0.00 122.300.600101248,000.00169894AS1 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:45 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.191 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 6 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings AccretionAmortization/EarningsAdjusted Interest September 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment #Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001285248,000.00 0.350AMR1ST 71.34 0.00 71.340.350101248,000.0002616AAH2 0.00 248,000.001286248,000.00 0.500STHRNB 101.92 0.00 101.920.500101248,000.0084223QAN7 0.00 248,000.001287248,000.00 0.500BKPRNC 101.92 0.00 101.920.500101248,000.00064520BG3 0.00 24,581.74129424,581.74DREYF 0.00 0.00 0.001010.00X9USDDTP3 0.00 137,450,447.35Subtotal 137,268,334.71 1.191 133,036.990.00129,836.99136,561,169.53 3,200.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 29.27105829.27USBANK 29.25 0.00 29.250.00323113,302,075.08SYS1058 0.00 29.27Subtotal 29.27 0.003 29.250.0029.2513,302,075.08 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 253,410.601062253,410.60LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241239,433.72SYS1062 0.00 253,410.60Subtotal 253,410.60 0.000.000.00239,433.72 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 16,510,033.50111316,510,033.50 0.685LAIF 11,438.52 0.00 11,438.520.84324916,510,033.5025-33-005 0.00 16,510,033.50Subtotal 16,510,033.50 0.843 11,438.520.0011,438.5216,510,033.50 0.00 154,213,920.72Total 154,031,808.08 1.059 144,504.760.00141,304.76166,612,711.83 3,200.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:45 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.192 City of La Quinta -City of La Quinta Maturity Report Sorted by Maturity Date Amounts due during July 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 Rate at MaturityPar Value Sec. TypeFund Maturity Date Maturity ProceedsInterest Income Net CUSIP Investment #Issuer Purchase Date Book Value at Maturity 240,000.00 1.750 242,094.252,094.2507/07/2017MERCTL108758740XZL7MC110107/07/2020 2,094.25240,000.00 240,000.00 1.750 242,094.252,094.2507/13/2017HIGHLD1094319141GT8MC110107/13/2020 2,094.25240,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1,007,500.007,500.0001/22/2018USTR11179128282Q2TRC10108/15/2020 21,700.00985,800.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1,008,125.008,125.0011/09/2017FHLB11043130A66T9FAC10109/11/2020 11,325.00996,800.00 2,499,813.50Total Maturities 2,480,000.00 19,813.502,462,600.00 37,213.50 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 12:53 MA (PRF_MA) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.193 City of La Quinta -City of La Quinta Purchases Report Sorted by Security Type - Fund July 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 Original Par Value Ending Book Value Sec. TypeFund Maturity YTM Accrued Interest at PurchasePayment Periods DateCUSIPInvestment #Issuer Purchase Date Principal Purchased Rate at Purchase Money Market/Mutual Funds 88.47 24,581.7488.4709/24/2020 09/30 - MonthlyDREYF1294X9USDDTP3LA4101 Subtotal 24,581.7488.47 0.0088.47 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 500,000.00 0.500 08/14/2025 500,000.00500,000.0008/14/2020 0.50002/14 - 08/14FNMA12883135G05S8FAC101 1,000,000.00 0.560 08/21/2025 1,000,000.001,000,000.0008/21/2020 0.56002/21 - 08/21FNMA12893136G4N74FAC101 500,000.00 0.520 08/18/2025 499,750.00499,750.00 Received08/28/2020 0.53002/18 - 08/18FNMA12903136G4M75FAC101 Subtotal 1,999,750.001,999,750.00 0.002,000,000.00 1,999,838.47Total Purchases 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,024,331.74 Received = Accrued Interest at Purchase was received by report ending date. Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/01/2020 - 14:58 PU (PRF_PU) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.194 US Treasury Rates https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yieldYear&year=2020 95 96 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Art in Public Places Annual Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Per the Municipal Code, the City must expend or commit fees from the Art in Public Places (APP) program within two years of receipt and monies collected must be accounted for in a separate fund. •An annual review of administrative expenses is required. There were no administrative expenses for 2019/20. •Attachment 1 presents the required analysis; the City has complied with the time limit for expenditure of fees and there are no findings to report. FISCAL IMPACT – None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City’s APP fund is governed by the Municipal Code. Annually, the City must demonstrate that it has complied with the following: •A determination whether or not the fees have been committed for use within two years of collection. Fees may be used for: The cost of public art and its installation; The cost to purchase or lease art sites; Waterworks, landscaping, lighting and other objects, which are an integral part of the artwork; Frames, mats, pedestals and other objects necessary for the proper presentation and installation of the artwork; Walls, pools, landscaping or other architectural or landscape architectural elements necessary for the proper aesthetic and structural placement of the artwork; Maintaining and repairing artwork; Administrative expenses to otherwise implement the APP program; Endowments; and Art replacement. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 97 •Review administrative expenses to ensure they were reasonably assessed to implement this program and that they do not exceed five percent of the total funds in the account on July 1 of any year or $25,000 in any fiscal year. If fees collected are not committed for the aforementioned uses, they are returned to the contributor. Staff analyzed APP fund revenues and expenditures, and no reimbursements are due to contributors. There were no administrative costs. During 2019/20, APP funds were used to purchase one art piece and install, maintain and preserve art pieces as detailed in Attachment 1. During FY 2019/20, the City purchased Opal Drops created by Art Glass by Marcus Thesing, Inc. The art piece is pictured to the right and is located inside the City Hall lobby. Each year this report is also provided to the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA), the Building Industry Association (BIA), and the Gas Company. On November 13, 2020, the City received a letter of satisfaction from the DVBA (Attachment 2). To date, no other correspondence has been received regarding this report. ALTERNATIVES As this report is a requirement of the Municipal Code, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Karla Romero, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. Art in Public Places FY 2019/20 Annual Financial Report 2. Desert Valley Builders Association Review 98 City of La Quinta ATTACHMENT 1 Art in Public Places (Fund 270) FY 2019/20 Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance at 7/1/2019 FY 19/20 Fund Balance at 6/30/2020 Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees 71,446 Interest income 26,011 Transfers In from the General Fund 100,000 Total Sources 197,457$ Expenditures & Other Uses Art Purchases 14,400 Maintenance of Public Art 14,480 Project Administration - Transfers Out for Construction Art Project 12,800 Total Uses 41,679 Total Available 536,248$ 155,777$ 692,026$ Two Year Test Using First In First Out Method Summary of Funds Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent June 30, 2016 682,810 47,187 163,012 529,000 37,985 June 30, 2017 566,985 47,660 64,312 522,000 28,333 June 30, 2018 550,334 43,391 84,699 522,000 (12,974) June 30, 2019 509,026 119,733 92,512 760,000 (223,753) June 30, 2020 536,248 197,457 41,679 697,200 (5,175) Total Revenue For Last Five Years 455,428$ 446,214$ Result : Two Year Spent or Committed Test Met. Future commitments for unspent funds are detailed below. Art in Public Places Expenses and Future Commitments Capital Projects and Expenses FY 19/20 Committed % Complete* % funded with fee Sculpture Restorations and Maintenance 15,248 - 100%100% Acknowledgement Plaques and Signs 632 - 100%100% Opal Drops, By: Art Glass by Marcus Thesing, Inc. 13,000 - 100%100% 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvements 6,035 193,965 13%1% 151603 La Quinta Village Complete Streets 6,765 88,235 78%1% 201608 SilverRock Event Space - 300,000 71%5% 201709 Jefferson/Avenue 53 Roundabout - 5,000 9%0.24% FY 2020/21 Budget for Art Purchases and Maintenance - 110,000 0%55% Total 41,679 697,200 * Percentage completed as of June 30, 2020. The Art in Public Places fund is used to account for fees paid in lieu of acquisition, installation, replacement, maintenance and repair of approved art works at approved sites. The fees are refundable if not expended or committed within two years. 99 ATTACHMENT 2100 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the fiscal year 2019/20 Development Project Fee Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Development Impact Fees (DIF) are imposed on new construction to help offset impacts created by new development on City facilities and infrastructure. •The State Mitigation Fee Act requires the City to annually report on the receipts and expenditures of DIF Funds for the last five years within 180 days of the close of the fiscal year. •The City must use, or pledge to use, the developer fees on City facilities and infrastructure within five years of receipt; or present findings if that was not the case. •Staff has completed the required analysis (Attachments 1 and 2) and in all cases the City has complied with the time limit to expend or commit fees for future projects. FISCAL IMPACT - None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has three development project category fees subject to State requirements: Infrastructure, Quimby, and DIF. Annually, the City reports on the following: •Brief description on the type of fee in the account or fund; •Amount of the fee; •Beginning and ending balance of the account or fund; •Amount of fees collected and interest earned; •Each public improvement on which fees were expended, the amount of expenditures, and total percentage of the project completed and costs funded with the fee; •Description of each interfund transfer, loan, and the public improvement funded. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 101 The City must also report payments received pursuant to development agreements entered into after January 1, 2004. A schedule of development agreement payments received, and expenditures are noted in Attachment 2. All projects were reported in the prior fiscal year. As of April 1, 2019, the following funds no longer repay loans owed to the General Fund. Unspent balances will be evaluated for appropriation during the 2020/21 budget cycle. Fund Unspent Balance Civic Center DIF (Fund 252) $ 301,271 Community Center DIF (Fund 254) $ 91,114 Street Maintenance DIF (Fund 255) $ 39,130 Park Maintenance DIF (Fund 256) $5,723 Fire Protection DIF (Fund 257) $ 136,036 Each year these reports are also provided to the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA), the Building Industry Association (BIA), and the Gas Company. On November 23, 2020, the City received a letter of satisfaction from the DVBA (Attachment 3). To date, no other correspondence has been received regarding these reports. ALTERNATIVES This report is required by State, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Karla Romero, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. FY 2019/20 Development Project Fee Report 2. FY 2019/20 Developer Agreement Activity Report 3. Desert Valley Builders Association Review 102 2017 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report ATTACHMENT 1 Quimby Fees (Fund 220) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees *- Interest Income 69,689 Contributions from Property Owners - Transfers In - Total Revenue Sources 69,689 Expenditures & Other Uses - Transfers out Capital Projects 1,933,252 Total Uses 1,933,252 Total Available 3,429,137$ (1,863,563)$ 1,565,574$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 5,660,033 80,364 305,730 5,979,239 (544,572) Revenues Collected from 2017 5,434,667 128,218 557,338 3,985,916 1,019,631 Revenues Collected from 2018 5,005,547 53,307 462,938 7,298,488 (2,702,572) Revenues Collected from 2019 4,595,916 129,832 1,296,611 4,714,876 (1,285,739) Revenues Collected from 2020 3,429,137 69,689 1,933,252 2,781,625 (1,216,051) Total Revenue For Last Five Years 461,410$ 4,555,869$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete**% funded with fee 151609 North La Quinta Regional Skate and BMX Park 32,713 2,518,625 20%78% 201608 SilverRock Event Space Park 1,500,382 - 71%33% 201801 Cove Trail Public Restrooms 400,158 - 83%77% 201903 Skate Park Conversion - 263,000 0%100% Total 1,933,252$ 2,781,625$ ** Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. The City's Quimby Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the accumulation of developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. FY 19/20 * The Quimby Act has not received any new developer revenues since December 2017 because the City has not had a project since May 2017 subject to the fee. 103 2017 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Infrastructure Fee (Fund 225) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees *- Interest Income 715 Reimbursements - Total Revenue Sources 715$ Expenditures & Other Uses 1,410 Capital Projects - Project Administration/Internal Engineering - Total Uses 1,410 Total Available 20,104$ (695)$ 19,408$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 22,339 279 - 22,618 0 Revenues Collected from 2017 23,618 114 - 22,618 1,114 Revenues Collected from 2018 23,732 182 - 22,618 1,296 Revenues Collected from 2019 23,914 733 4,543 24,028 (3,924) Revenues Collected from 2020 20,104 715 1,410 22,618 (3,210) Total Revenue For Last Five Years 2,023$ 5,953$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete** % funded with fee 151603 La Quinta Village Complete Streets - Road Diet - 22,618 78%0.20% 2019 DIF Study Update 1,410 - 100%11% Total 1,410 22,618$ * The Infrastructure Fee is being phased out and not subject to collection of future revenue from developments. ** Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. The Infrastructure fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined in Resolution 2013-006. FY 19/20 104 2016 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Transportation DIF (Fund 250) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 2,842$ Residential - Single Family Attached Unit 2,842$ Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit 1,745$ Office/Hospital Unit 4,645$ General Commercial 1,000 sq ft 5,679$ Tourist Commercial 1,000 sq ft 1,590$ Golf Course Acre 669$ Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees 715,194 Interest Income 86,803 Miscellaneous - Transfers In - Total Revenue Sources 801,997 Expenditures & Other Uses 401,410 Transfers out Capital Projects 541,809 Total Uses 943,219 Total Available 2,462,724$ (141,222)$ 2,321,502$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 3,763,390 487,907 779,896 6,745,168 (3,273,767) Revenues Collected from 2017 3,471,401 388,472 203,047 3,595,274 61,552 Revenues Collected from 2018 3,656,826 539,365 1,097,811 2,551,507 546,873 Revenues Collected from 2019 3,098,380 756,223 1,391,880 4,971,752 (2,509,028) Revenues Collected from 2020 2,462,724 801,997 943,219 4,897,398 (2,575,896) Total Revenue For Last Five Years 2,973,964$ 4,415,853$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete*% funded with fee 091002 Madison Street Ave. 50 to Ave. 52 532,895 - 100%66% 091004 Dune Palms Road Street Improvements 2,407 - 98%1% 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvement - 73,755 13%2%151603 La Quinta Village Complete Streets - Road Diet - 343,055 78%4% 201702 Developer Reimbursements 400,000 3,339,723 26%100% 201709 Avenue 53 Jefferson Street Roundabout - 170,621 9%11%201902 Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the Evacuation Channel 6,506 970,244 0.22%33% 2019 DIF Study Update 1,410 - 100%11% Total 943,219$ 4,897,398$ * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. The Transportation Impact Fee developer fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for street system improvements needed to handle traffic that will be generated by future development. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. FY 19/20 105 2016 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Parks & Rec DIF (Fund 251) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 2,048$ Residential - Single Family Attached Unit 2,048$ Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit 2,048$ Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees 448,512 Interest Income 24,439 Miscellaneous Transfers In Total Revenue Sources 472,951 Expenditures & Other Uses 1,410 Transfers Out Capital Projects 1,440,287 Total Uses 1,441,697 Total Available 1,262,773$ (968,747)$ 294,027$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 140,525 218,177 - 358,702 0 Revenues Collected from 2017 358,702 200,093 - -558,795 Revenues Collected from 2018 558,795 329,110 - -887,905 Revenues Collected from 2019 887,905 379,411 4,542 2,401,410 (1,138,637) Revenues Collected from 2020 1,262,773 472,951 1,441,697 959,713 (665,686) Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1,599,741$ 1,446,239$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete* % funded with fee 201608 SilverRock Event Space 1,440,287 959,713 71%40% 2019 DIF Study Update 1,410 - 100%11% Total 1,441,697$ 959,713$ * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. The Parks & Recreation Impact Fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for parks required to serve future development. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. FY 19/20 106 2017 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Civic Center DIF (Fund 252) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 942$ Residential - Single Family Attached Unit 796$ Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit 447$ Office/Hospital Unit 373$ General Commercial 1,000 sq ft 373$ Tourist Commercial 1,000 sq ft 363$ Golf Course Acre 179$ Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees 213,014 Interest Income 9,928 Miscellaneous Transfers In Total Revenue Sources 222,942 Expenditures & Other Uses 1,411 Total Uses 1,411 Total Available 79,740$ 221,531$ 301,271$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 (7,259,468) 109,007 61,546 - (7,212,007) Revenues Collected from 2017 (7,212,007) 98,740 55,994 - (7,169,261) Revenues Collected from 2018 (7,169,261) 145,494 79,286 - (7,103,053) Revenues Collected from 2019 **(7,103,053) 177,800 (7,004,993) 1,410 78,330 Revenues Collected from 2020 79,740 222,942 1,411 - 301,271 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 753,983$ (6,806,756)$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete *% funded with fee 2019 DIF Study Update 1,411$ - 100%11% Total 1,411$ -$ * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. ** Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written-off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $301,271 and will be included in the FY 2021/22 budget. The Civic Center Impact Fee fund was used to fund the expansion of the La Quinta Civic Center completed in 2008 to support the City's needs through build out. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. FY 19/20 107 2017 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Library DIF (Fund 253) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 344$ Residential - Single Family Attached Unit 344$ Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit 344$ Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance FY 19/20 Fund Balance Developer Fees 75,336 Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Total Revenue Sources 75,336 Expenditures & Other Uses 1,410 Advance Interest Expense 28,868 Total Uses 30,278 Total Available (1,550,245)$ 45,058$ (1,505,187)$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 (1,654,779) 36,464 12,686 1,631,001 (3,262,001) Revenues Collected from 2017 (1,631,001) 34,056 12,890 1,609,835 (3,219,670) Revenues Collected from 2018 (1,609,835) 56,416 19,138 1,572,557 (3,145,114) Revenues Collected from 2019 (1,572,557) 57,792 35,480 1,549,846 (3,100,091) Revenues Collected from 2020 (1,550,245) 75,336 30,278 1,505,187 (3,010,374) Total Revenue For Last Five Years 260,064$ 110,472$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete *% funded with fee Successor Agency loan repayment (construction of public library facility) **28,868 1,505,187 40%100% 2019 DIF Study Update 1,410 - 100%11% Total 30,278$ 1,505,187$ * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. ** Loan repayment interest rate is based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. As of 6/30/2020 the outstanding loan balance was:Principal 1,505,187 Interest - Total Due 1,505,187 This loan remains active and is being evaluated in FY 2020/21. The Library Impact Fee fund is used for library facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. 108 2017 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Community Center DIF (Fund 254) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 129$ Residential - Single Family Attached Unit 129$ Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit 129$ Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees 28,251 Interest Income 7,021 Miscellaneous Transfers In Total Revenue Sources 35,272 Expenditures & Other Uses 1,410 Total Uses 1,410 Total Available 158,891$ 33,863$ 192,753$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 86,780 14,859 - 101,639 0 Revenues Collected from 2017 101,639 13,325 - 101,600 13,364 Revenues Collected from 2018 114,964 21,993 - 101,639 35,318 Revenues Collected from 2019 136,956 26,477 4,542 103,049 55,842 Revenues Collected from 2020 158,891 35,272 1,410 101,639 91,114 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 111,926$ 5,952$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete * % funded with fee 151609 La Quinta X Park Youth Center - 101,639 20%2% 2019 DIF Study Update 1,410 - 100%11% Total 1,410$ 101,639$ * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $91,114 and will be included in the FY 21/22 budget. The Community Center Fee fund is used for community center facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. FY 19/20 109 2017 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Street Maintenance DIF (Fund 255) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 116$ Residential - Single Family Attached Unit 116$ Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit 71$ Office/Hospital Unit 190$ General Commercial 1000 sq ft 232$ Tourist Commercial 1000 sq ft 65$ Golf Course Acre 27$ Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees 28,967 Interest Income 1,284 Miscellaneous Transfers In - Total Revenue Sources 30,251 Expenditures & Other Uses 1,410 Total Uses 1,410 Total Available 10,289$ 28,841$ 39,130$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 (1,907,295) 22,325 16,581 - (1,901,551) Revenues Collected from 2017 (1,901,551) 19,095 15,191 - (1,897,647) Revenues Collected from 2018 (1,897,647) 27,349 21,296 - (1,891,594) Revenues Collected from 2019 **(1,891,594) 30,194 (1,871,689) 1,410 8,879 Revenues Collected from 2020 10,289$ 30,251 1,410 - 39,130 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 129,214$ (1,817,211)$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete * % funded with fee 2019 DIF Study Update 1,410 - 100%11% Total 1,410$ -$ * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. ** Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written-off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $39,130 and will be included in the FY 21/22 budget. The Street Maintenance Fee fund is used for street maintenance required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. FY 19/20 110 2017 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Park Maintenance DIF (Fund 256) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 40$ Residential - Single Family Attached Unit 40$ Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit 40$ Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees 8,760 Interest Income 155 Miscellaneous Transfers In Total Revenue Sources 8,915 Expenditures & Other Uses 1,410 Transfers Out - Total Uses 1,410 Total Available (1,782)$ 7,505$ 5,723$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 2 4,243 4,244 - 2 Revenues Collected from 2017 2 3,969 3,969 - 2 Revenues Collected from 2018 2 6,570 6,567 - 5 Revenues Collected from 2019 **5 6,722 8,508 1,410 (3,192) Revenues Collected from 2020 (1,782) 8,915 1,410 - 5,723 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 30,419$ 24,698$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete *% funded with fee 2019 DIF Study Update 1,410 - 100%11% Total 1,410$ -$ * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. ** Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written-off. Expenses from this Fund will resume in FY 21/22 or as adjusted in FY 20/21. The Park Maintenance Fee fund is used for park maintenance required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. FY 19/20 111 2017 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Fire Protection DIF (Fund 257) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2020 Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 433$ Residential - Single Family Attached Unit 366$ Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit 206$ Office/Hospital Unit 171$ General Commercial 1000 sq ft 172$ Tourist Commercial 1000 sq ft 167$ Golf Course Acre 82$ Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Developer Fees 97,907 Interest Income 4,466 Miscellaneous Transfers In Total Revenue Sources 102,373 Expenditures & Other Uses 1,410 Total Uses 1,410 Total Available 35,073$ 100,963$ 136,036$ Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2016 (638,219) 50,120 5,385 - (593,484) Revenues Collected from 2017 (593,484) 45,399 4,581 - (552,666) Revenues Collected from 2018 (552,665) 66,456 4,634 - (490,843) Revenues Collected from 2019 **(490,843) 81,761 (444,154) 1,410 33,663 Revenues Collected from 2020 35,073 102,373 1,410 - 136,036 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 346,109$ (428,145)$ Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 19/20 Committed % Complete * % funded with fee 2019 DIF Study Update 1,410 - 100%11% Total 1,410$ -$ * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2020. ** Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written-off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $136,036 and will be included in the FY 21/22 budget. The Fire Protection Facilities Fee fund is used for fire protection facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. FY 19/20 112 2019/20 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report ATTACHMENT 2 Developer Agreement Activity (Fund 401) FYE 6/30/2020 Date Project/Purpose Balance Revenues Expenses Total 3/8/2010 Traffic Signals at Madison Street on Avenue 58 and Avenue 60 257,563.00 - - 257,563.00 10/18/2010 Monroe Avenue landscape median, Trilogy/Shea TM30023 234,869.64 - - 234,869.64 1/25/2016 Traffic signal at Madison Street at Avenue 52, Madison Club 215,000.00 215,000.00 10/11/2016 Madison at Avenue 52 raised median, TM33076-1 59,642.00 - - 59,642.00 6/14/2019 Turn lane extension at Highway 111 & Costco Drive 3,644.22 - - 3,644.22 6/30/2020 Traffic signal at Madison Street at Avenue 54, COA/Griffin Ranch - 107,500.00 107,500.00 Account No. 401-0000-22811 878,218.86$ 11/30/2009 Lions gate project 1821 sidewalk and landscaping 16,798.30 - - 16,798.30 1/31/2011 Toll Brothers, Avenue 50 & Verano Drive, TM 30357, Mt. View Country Club Traffic Signal Improvements 215,000.00 215,000.00 6/30/2015 Avenue 53 at Jefferson Street Roundabout 39,833.52 - (39,252.90) 580.62 6/30/2015 Traffic signal Avenue 50 & Orchard, Project 1757 99,075.26 - - 99,075.26 2/24/2016 ACM LQ/Highway 111 & Simon Drive 2,788.50 - - 2,788.50 2/24/2016 ACM LQ/Washington & Miles 8,460.00 - - 8,460.00 6/30/2019 Dune Palms Road Widening Eminent Domain 7,895.55 6,465.31 14,360.86 (Account No. 401-0000-22210)357,063.54$ 1,235,282.40$ The following development agreement payment was received for development agreements entered into after January 1, 2004 in accordance with Government Code Section 65865 Total Developer Contributions for Future CIP Projects Total Unearned Revenue on Deposit OVERALL TOTAL AVAILABLE 113 ATTACHMENT 3114 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE CITYWIDE MISCELLANEOUS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2020-02 RECOMMENDATION Approve plans, specifications, engineer’s estimate, and authorize Staff to bid the Citywide Miscellaneous Americans with Disabilities Act Improvements Project No. 2020-02. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •This project is located at two locations (Attachment 1): o Base Bid – Sidewalk gap closure on the east side of Jefferson Street south of Avenue 50. o Additive Alternate – New curb ramp on the southwest corner of Washington Street and Avenue 47. This alternate will only be recommended for award if the base bid is lower than the estimate. •Construction is funded with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, which must be expended by March 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT The projected budget is $184,000, of which $56,538 will be allocated from the Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project (Project No. 2021STI) and $127,462 from CDBG funds for construction costs as follows: CDBG Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project Total Budget Professional/Design: $ 0 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 0 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Construction: $ 127,462 $ 4,538 $ 132,000 Contingency: $ 0 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Total Budget: $ 127,462 $ 56,538 $ 184,000 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 115 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 2011, the City conducted an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility survey of all public facilities. To date, the City has addressed ADA deficiencies at the Exterior and Interior of City Hall, La Quinta Park, Civic Center Campus, La Quinta Library, SilverRock parking lot, Museum, YMCA, Sports Complex, Velasco Park, Eisenhower Park, Adams Park, Desert Pride Park, Saguaro Park, Fritz Burns Park, Seasons Park, and the majority of Avenida Bermudas. This year’s CDBG project will include infilling missing links to provide more access to shopping developments and public transportation. The improvements include constructing a sidewalk on the east side of Jefferson Street south of Avenue 50 and, if funding allows, constructing a new curb ramp on the southwest corner of Washington Street and Avenue 47. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on December 15, 2020, the following is the project schedule: Council Bid Authorization December 15, 2020 Bid Period December 16, 2020 to January 14, 2020 Council Considers Project Award February 2, 2020 Execute Contract and Mobilize February 3 to March 1, 2021 Construction (20 Working Days) March 2021 Accept Improvements April 2021 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative due to the funding timing constraints. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 116 *IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. © Riverside County GIS Legend From Avenue 50 to Derek Alan Drive Notes REPORT PRINTED ON...2/7/2019 11:38:16 AM Vicinity Map 0 12,0376, 019 Feet Blueline Streams City Areas World Street Map ATTACHMENT 1 117 ATTACHMENT 1 118 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 SALARY SCHEDULE INCREASING THE MINIMUM WAGE RATE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2021 RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to approve fiscal year 2020/21 Salary Schedule increasing the minimum wage rate effective January 1, 2021. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 14, 2016, California Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 3 (Leno), raising California's minimum wage by set amounts each year to reach $15 per hour by January 1, 2022, for employers with 26 or more employees. As of January 1, 2021, California law requires the minimum wage for all industries to be no less than $14 per hour for businesses with 26 or more employees. . The City's part-time Recreation and Senior Recreation Leaders will be affected by this change. FISCAL IMPACT This wage increase has an additional estimated cost of $10,200 in the current fiscal years 2020/21 budget. Funds are available in the Contingency for Staffing Account (101-1007-50115). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On January 1, 2021, the State of California minimum wage will increase from $13 to $14 per hour. The increase to the California minimum wage impacts the salary schedule for part-time Recreation and Senior Recreation Leaders. Employers in California are subject to both the federal and state minimum wage laws. When there are conflicting requirements between federal and state laws, the employer must follow the stricter standard, which is the most CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 119 beneficial to the employee. Since California's current law requires a higher minimum wage rate than the federal law, all California employers are subject to the state minimum wage rate unless their employees are exempt under California law. This exemption includes outside salespersons, individuals who are the parent, spouse, or child of the employer, and apprentices regularly indentured under the State Division of Apprenticeship Standards. ALTERNATIVES – None Prepared by: Carla Triplett, Human Resources Analyst Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director 120 RESOLUTION NO. 2020 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 SALARY SCHEDULE INCREASING THE MINIMUM WAGE RATE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2021 WHEREAS, on January 1, 2021, the State of California minimum wage will increase from $13 to $14 per hour in accordance with Senate Bill 3 (Leno) signed into law by California Governor Jerry Brown on April 14, 2016; and WHEREAS, the increase to the California minimum wage will impact the salary schedule for part-time Recreation and Senior Recreation Leaders; and WHEREAS, the increase will affect the salary steps in the salary schedule for part-time Recreation and Senior Recreation Leaders; and WHEREAS, the City must comply with the State of California minimum wage law; and WHEREAS, the City’s Personnel Policy Section 3.5, Preparation and Adoption of Compensation Plan, requires the City Council to approve the salary schedule by adopting a Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City does hereby approve the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Salary Schedule, increasing the minimum wage rate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption. The Fiscal Year 2020/21 Salary Schedule shall go into effect January 1, 2021. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 15th day of December 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 121 Resolution No. 2020 – XXX Updated Fiscal Year 2020/21 Salary Schedule Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 2 of 2 ________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ____________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 122 2020/21 Salary Schedule WORKING TITLE DBM STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 7 STEP 8 STEP 9 STEP 10 Administrative Assistant Maintenance Worker I A11 $ 38,741.77 $ 40,678.86 $ 42,615.94 $ 44,553.03 $ 46,490.12 $ 48,067.64 $ 49,645.16 $ 51,222.68 $ 52,800.20 $ 54,377.72 Maintenance Worker II A12 $ 42,624.17 $ 44,755.38 $ 46,886.59 $ 49,017.80 $ 51,149.00 $ 52,884.59 $ 54,620.18 $ 56,355.77 $ 58,091.36 $ 59,826.95 Administrative Technician Community Resources Coordinator Management Assistant Traffic Signal Technician B21 $ 50,400.62 $ 52,920.65 $ 55,440.68 $ 57,960.71 $ 60,480.74 $ 62,533.09 $ 64,585.44 $ 66,637.79 $ 68,690.14 $ 70,742.49 Account Technician Building Inspector I Code Compliance Officer I Executive Assistant Permit Technician B22 $ 54,283.01 $ 56,997.16 $ 59,711.31 $ 62,425.46 $ 65,139.61 $ 67,350.03 $ 69,560.45 $ 71,770.87 $ 73,981.29 $ 76,191.71 Building Inspector II Code Compliance Officer II Construction Inspector Maintenance & Operations Technician B23 $ 58,165.41 $ 61,073.69 $ 63,981.96 $ 66,890.23 $ 69,798.50 $ 72,166.99 $ 74,535.48 $ 76,903.97 $ 79,272.46 $ 81,640.94 Deputy City Clerk Junior Accountant Maintenance Foreman Management Specialist Parks/L&L Foreman Plans Examiner B24 $ 63,517.31 $ 66,693.18 $ 69,869.04 $ 73,044.91 $ 76,220.77 $ 78,807.14 $ 81,393.51 $ 83,979.88 $ 86,566.25 $ 89,152.63 Accountant Management Specialist B25 $ 70,103.01 $ 73,608.16 $ 77,113.31 $ 80,618.46 $ 84,123.61 $ 86,978.27 $ 89,832.93 $ 92,687.59 $ 95,542.25 $ 98,396.92 Animal/Code Officer Supervisor Maintenance & Operations Superintendent Plans Examiner/Inspector Supervisor B32 $ 70,103.01 $ 73,608.16 $ 77,113.31 $ 80,618.46 $ 84,123.61 $ 86,978.27 $ 89,832.93 $ 92,687.59 $ 95,542.25 $ 98,396.92 WORKING TITLE DBM STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 7 STEP 8 STEP 9 STEP 10 STEP 11 STEP 12 STEP 13 STEP 14Assistant Construction Manager Associate Planner Community Resources Analyst Sr. Emergency Management Coordinator Financial Services Analyst Human Resources Analyst Management Analyst Public Safety Analyst Traffic Operations Analyst C42 $ 76,782.29 $ 79,981.81 $ 83,181.32 $ 86,380.84 $ 89,580.36 $ 92,776.04 $ 95,977.86 $ 98,761.22 $ 101,544.58 $ 104,327.94 $ 107,111.30 $ 109,894.66 $ 112,678.02 $ 115,461.35 Construction Manager/Inspection Supervisor C43 $ 80,992.91 $ 84,367.89 $ 87,742.86 $ 91,117.84 $ 94,492.81 $ 97,863.74 $ 101,241.14 $ 104,177.13 $ 107,113.12 $ 110,049.11 $ 112,985.10 $ 115,921.09 $ 118,857.08 $ 121,793.08 Associate Engineer Senior Planner C44 $ 86,265.68 $ 89,860.37 $ 93,455.06 $ 97,049.76 $ 100,644.45 $ 104,234.82 $ 107,832.10 $ 110,959.23 $ 114,086.36 $ 117,213.49 $ 120,340.62 $ 123,467.75 $ 126,594.88 $ 129,722.00 Accounting Manager Assistant to the City Manager Building Official Community Resources Manager Hub Manager Human Resources Manager Marketing Manager Planning Manager Public Safety Manager D61 $ 97,860.71 $ 101,938.57 $ 106,016.43 $ 110,094.28 $ 114,172.14 $ 118,245.10 $ 122,325.89 $ 125,873.34 $ 129,420.79 $ 132,968.24 $ 136,515.69 $ 140,063.14 $ 143,610.59 $ 147,158.03 City Clerk D62 $ 102,753.75 $ 107,035.50 $ 111,317.25 $ 115,599.00 $ 119,880.74 $ 124,157.36 $ 128,442.19 $ 132,167.01 $ 135,891.83 $ 139,616.65 $ 143,341.47 $ 147,066.29 $ 150,791.11 $ 154,515.95 Facilities Deputy Director D63 $ 107,891.44 $ 112,387.27 $ 116,883.11 $ 121,378.94 $ 125,874.78 $ 130,365.22 $ 134,864.30 $ 138,775.36 $ 142,686.42 $ 146,597.48 $ 150,508.54 $ 154,419.60 $ 158,330.66 $ 162,241.75 Community Resources Director Design & Development Director Finance Director/City Treasurer Public Works Director/City Engineer E82 $ 129,959.40 $ 135,374.81 $ 140,790.22 $ 146,205.63 $ 151,621.04 $ 157,029.95 $ 162,449.25 $ 167,160.27 $ 171,871.29 $ 176,582.31 $ 181,293.33 $ 186,004.35 $ 190,715.37 $ 195,426.42 City Manager F101* $ 176,822.32 $ 184,190.51 $ 191,558.69 $ 198,926.88 $ 206,295.06 $ 213,654.41 $ 221,027.90 $ 227,437.70 $ 233,847.50 $ 240,257.30 $ 246,667.10 $ 253,076.90 $ 259,486.70 $ 265,896.53 Per Meeting Monthly Recreation Leader A01 $13.00 $13.65 $14.30 $14.95 $15.60 $0.00 Recreation Leader A01 $14.00 $14.70 $15.40 $16.10 $16.80 $50.00 $2,800.00 Senior Recreation Leader A02 $17.00 $17.85 $18.70 $19.55 $20.40 $75.00 Senior Recreation Leader A02 $18.00 $18.90 $19.80 $20.70 $21.60 $100.00 $2,300.00 Administrative Technician B21 $24.23 $25.44 $26.65 $27.87 $29.08 Software Program Report Writer B24 $30.54 $32.06 $33.59 $35.12 $36.64 Planning Commission FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES (ANNUAL) Council Members Boards and Commission Members Construction Appeals & Oversight Board Housing Commission Community Services & Financial Advisory NON-DISCRETIONARY STEPS DISCRETIONARY STEPS (PERFORMANCE BASED) NON-DISCRETIONARY STEPS DISCRETIONARY STEPS (PERFORMANCE BASED) PART-TIME EMPLOYEES (HOURLY)Elected Official Positions Mayor City Council Approval - 12/15/2020 Effective - 01/01/2021 Revised EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX 123 124 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 586 ON SECOND READING AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. 586 on second reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On December 1, 2020, Council introduced Ordinance No. 586 for first reading to amend Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) related Short-Term Vacation Rentals (STVRs). This code amendment clarifies the process, standards, and compliance for STVRs. FISCAL IMPACT – None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 1, 2020, Council introduced Ordinance No. 586 for first reading to amend Chapter 3.25 of the LQMC related to STVRs approving the following code amendments as recommended by Staff: Add “booking transaction,” “hosting platform,” “rental agreement,” and “suspension” to Section 3.25.030 Definitions; and clarify “occupant” is any person(s) occupying the dwelling with or without a rental agreement. STVR permit renewal application shall be submitted no earlier than 60 but no later than 30 calendar days prior to permit expiration; the City will process STVR permit applications within 30 calendar days from submittal. The City must be notified immediately upon change of ownership of a STVR unit, which terminates the existing STVR permit and all STVR operations must cease immediately; the new property owner must obtain a new STVR permit in order to operate the property as a STVR unit; failure to comply may result in a fine of $1,000 per day for a continuing violation. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 125  Bedroom additions or conversions must be verified and approved by the City to ensure compliance with City codes; the STVR permit shall be reissued to reflect the approved number of bedrooms allowed; STVR property advertisement must list only the approved number of bedrooms.  If declaration of non-use is submitted by STVR owner while the STVR permit is suspended, the owner shall be eligible to apply for a new STVR permit after 12 consecutive months have elapsed from the date of the declaration of non-use.  STVR permit application for properties within Homeowners Associations (HOA’s) must submit a letter from the HOA indicating STVRs are allowed in the community; STVR permits will not be issued for communities that do not allow STVRs.  STVR unit’s online registration profile must be up-to-date at all times.  The City or its authorized designees, shall have the right to conduct a count of all persons occupying the STVR unit in response to a complaint.  The person(s) listed as the local contact person for the STVR unit shall be available 24-hours per day, 7-days per week, with the ability to respond to the location upon notification or attempted notification.  STVR advertisements shall include the number of authorized bedrooms and STVR permit number at the beginning or top of the ad.  Hosting platforms are required to verify property listings have an active STVR permit prior to booking transactions on their sites.  The City Manager shall have the final decision in any appeals brought under this chapter. Council also approved the following additional amendments shown in tracked changes in Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 587:  Add language clarifying that a STVR permit is valid for one year in Section 3.25.050, subsection (B).  Add language clarifying that change of STVR unit ownership includes “a new person and/or new entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind.” 126  Add language clarifying that “reissuance” of a STVR permit is not a renewal of the STVR permit.  Inaccurate advertisement of the number of approved bedrooms is subject to a fine by administrative citation for first offence, and a second or subsequent violation for the same are subject to fines and may result in STVR permit revocation (including permanent revocation).  Reduce the local contact person response time from 45 minutes to 30 minutes.  Add language clarifying that hosting platforms are subject to Section 3.25.090 Violations.  Increase General and Operating STVR violation fines in Section 3.25.090, subsections (E)(1) and (E)(2) as noted in Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 586. ALTERNATIVES As Council approved this ordinance at first reading, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 127 128 ORDINANCE NO. 586 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT TERM VACATION RENTALS WHEREAS, Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) relates to short-term vacation rentals; and WHEREAS, the City has the authority to regulate businesses operating within the City; and WHEREAS, Chapter 3.25 of the LQMC addresses permitted uses, short- term vacation rental process and permitting procedures; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are necessary to clarify regulations, process, and standards for short-term vacation rentals under the City’s short-term vacation rental program, as more particularly set forth in this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 3.25 shall be amended as written in "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments to "Exhibit A" to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 3. Posting: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 5. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of 129 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 2 of 17 competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 15th day of December, 2020 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 130 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 3 of 17 Chapter 3.25 SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS Chapter 3.25 SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS 3.25.010 Title. This chapter shall be referred to as the “Short-Term Vacation Rental Regulations.” (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.020 Purpose. A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish regulations for the use of privately owned residential dwellings as short-term vacation rentals that ensure the collection and payment of transient occupancy taxes (TOT) as provided in Chapter 3.24 of this code, and minimize the negative secondary effects of such use on surrounding residential neighborhoods. B. This chapter is not intended to provide any owner of residential property with the right or privilege to violate any private conditions, covenants and restrictions applicable to the owner’s property that may prohibit the use of such owner’s residential property for short-term vacation rental purposes as defined in this chapter. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) C. The requirements of this chapter shall be presumed to apply to any residential dwelling that has received a short-term vacation rental permit. A rebuttable presumption arises that, whenever there is an occupant(s), paying rent or not, of a residential dwelling that has received a short-term vacation rental permit, the requirements of this chapter shall apply, including but not limited to any suspension or other modifications imposed on a short-term vacation rental permit as set forth in this chapter. The city manager or authorized designee shall have the authority to implement any necessary or appropriate policies and procedures to implement the rebuttable presumption set forth in this section. 3.25.030 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning respectively ascribed to them by this section: “Advertise,” “advertisement,” “advertising,” “publish,” and “publication” mean any and all means, whether verbal or written, through any media whatsoever whether in use prior to, at the time of, or after the enactment of the ordinance amending this chapter, used for conveying to any member or members of the public the ability or availability to rent a short-term vacation rental unit as defined in this section, or used for conveying to any member or members of the public a notice of an intention to rent a short-term vacation rental unit as defined in this section. For purposes of this definition, the following media are listed as examples, which are not and shall not be construed as exhaustive: Verbal or written announcements by proclamation or outcry, newspaper advertisement, magazine advertisement, handbill, written or printed notice, printed or poster display, billboard display, e-mail or other electronic/digital messaging platform, electronic commerce/commercial Internet websites, and any and all other electronic media, television, radio, satellite-based, or Internet website. EXHIBIT A 131 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 4 of 17 “Applicable laws, rules and regulations” means any laws, rules, regulations and codes (whether local, state or federal) pertaining to the use and occupancy of a privately owned dwelling unit as a short- term vacation rental. “Applicant” means the owner of the short-term vacation rental unit. “Authorized agent or representative” means a designated agent or representative who is appointed by the owner and also is responsible for compliance with this chapter with respect to the short-term vacation rental unit. “Booking transaction” means any reservation or payment service provided by a person or entity who facilitates a home-sharing or vacation rental (including short-term vacation rental) transaction between a prospective occupant and an owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative. “City manager” means that person acting in the capacity of the city manager of the city of La Quinta or authorized designee. “Declaration of non-use” means the declaration described in Section 3.25.050. “Dwelling” has the same meaning as set forth in Section 9.280.030 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code; “dwelling” does not include any impermanent, transitory, or mobile means of temporary lodging, including but not limited to mobile homes, recreational vehicles (RVs), car trailers, and camping tents. “Good neighbor brochure” means a document prepared by the city that summarizes the general rules of conduct, consideration, and respect, including, without limitation, provisions of this code and other applicable laws, rules or regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of short-term vacation rental units. “Hosting platform” means a person or entity who participates in the home-sharing or vacation rental (including short-term vacation rental) business by collecting or receiving a fee, directly or indirectly through an agent or intermediary, for conducting a booking transaction using any medium of facilitation, including but not limited to the Internet. “Local contact person” means the person designated by the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative who shall be available twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week with the ability to respond to the location within forty-five minutes for the purpose of: (1) taking remedial action to resolve any such complaints; and (2) responding to complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit. A designated local contact person must obtain a business license otherwise required by Sections 3.24.060 and 3.28.020 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. “Notice of permit modification, suspension or revocation” means the notice the city may issue to an applicant, authorized agent or representative, local contact person, occupant, owner, responsible person, or any other person or entity authorized to be issued such notice under this code for a short- term vacation rental unit, upon a determination by the city of a violation of this chapter or other provisions of this code relating to authorized uses of property subject to this chapter. “Occupant” means any person(s) occupying the dwelling at any time. “Owner” means the person(s) or entity(ies) that hold(s) legal and/or equitable title to the subject short- term vacation rental. 132 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 5 of 17 “Property” means a residential legal lot of record on which a short-term vacation rental unit is located. “Rent” has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3.24.020 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. “Rental agreement” means a written or verbal agreement for use and occupancy of a privately-owned residential dwelling that has been issued a short-term vacation rental permit, including a dwelling that may have a permit which has been or is under suspension. “Responsible person” means the signatory of an agreement for the rental, use and occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit, and/or any person(s) occupying the short-term vacation rental unit without a rental agreement, including the owner(s), owner’s authorized agent(s) or representative(s), local contact(s), and their guests, who shall be an occupant of that short-term vacation rental unit, who is at least twenty-one years of age, and who is legally responsible for ensuring that all occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit and/or their guests comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. “Short-term vacation rental permit” means a permit that permits the use of a privately owned residential dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, and which incorporates by consolidation a transient occupancy permit and a business license otherwise required by Sections 3.24.060 and 3.28.020 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. “Short-term vacation rental unit” means a privately owned residential dwelling, such as, but not limited to, a single-family detached or multiple-family attached unit, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings and/or property and/or yard features appurtenant thereto, rented for occupancy and/or occupied for dwelling, lodging, or any transient use, including but not limited to sleeping overnight purposes for a period of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days, by any person(s) with or without a rental agreement. “STVR” may be used by city officials as an abbreviation for “short-term vacation rental.” “Suspension” means that short-term vacation rental permit that is suspended pursuant to Section 3.25.090. “Tenant” or “transient,” for purposes of this chapter, means any person who seeks to rent or who does rent, or who occupies or seeks to occupy, for thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, a short- term vacation rental unit. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.040 Authorized agent or representative. A. Except for the completion of an application for a short-term vacation rental permit and business license, the owner may designate an authorized agent or representative to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter with respect to the short-term vacation rental unit on his, her or their behalf. Nevertheless, the owner shall not be relieved from any personal responsibility and personal liability for noncompliance with any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit, regardless of whether such noncompliance was committed by the owner’s authorized agent or representative or the occupants of the owner’s short-term vacation rental unit or their guests. 133 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 6 of 17 B. The owner must be the applicant for and holder of a short-term vacation rental permit and business license and shall not authorize an agent or a representative to apply for or hold a short-term vacation rental permit and business license on the owner’s behalf. The owner’s signature is required on all short-term vacation rental application forms, and the city may prescribe reasonable requirements to verify that an applicant or purported owner is the owner in fact. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.050 Short-term vacation rental permit—Required. A. The owner is required to obtain a short-term vacation rental permit and a business license from the city before the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative may rent or advertise a short-term vacation rental unit. No short-term vacation rental use may occur in the city except in compliance with this chapter. No property in the city may be issued a short-term vacation rental permit or used as a short-term vacation rental unit unless the property is a residential dwelling that complies with the requirements of this chapter. B. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall be valid for one (1) year and renewed on an annual basis in order to remain valid. 1. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license renewal application shall be submitted no earlier than sixty (60) calendar days but no later than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the permit’s expiration date. Failure to renew a short-term vacation rental permit as prescribed in this section may result in the short-term vacation rental permit being terminated. 2. A new owner of a property that(or a new person and/or new entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner of a property) previously operated as a short-term vacation rental unit by the former owner (or by a former person or entity that owned or controlled the business or organization or other entity of any kind that continues to be the owner of the property) may not renew the previous owner’s short-term vacation rental permit and shall apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit, pursuant to this chapter, if the new owner (or new person and/or new entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind that continues to be the owner of a property) wants to continue to use the residential dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit. 3. If an owner or an owner’s authorized agent or representative, pursuant to all applicable laws, constructs additional bedrooms to an existing residential dwelling or converts non-bedroom spaces and areas in an existing residential dwelling into additional bedrooms, the owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall notify the city and update the short-term vacation rental unit’s online registration profile upon city approval of the addition or conversion so that the city may confirm that such conversion is consistent with this chapter and the code, including all applicable provisions in Title 8 of the code, and reissue the short- term vacation rental permit so that it accurately identifies the number of approved bedrooms, if the owner wants to continue to use the dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit. The city may conduct an onsite inspection of the property to verify compliance with this chapter and the code. Code compliance inspections may be billed for full cost recovery at one hour for initial inspection and in thirty-minute increments for each follow-up inspection pursuant to subsection D. For purposes of this chapter, “reissue” or “reissuance” of a short-term 134 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 7 of 17 vacation rental permit means a permit that is reissued by the city, with corrected information, as applicable, to be valid for the balance of the existing one (1)-year permit and license period. C. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall be valid only for the number of bedrooms in a residential dwelling equal to the number of bedrooms the city establishes as eligible for listing as a short-term vacation rental unit and shall not exceed the number of bedrooms allowable for the number of occupants as set forth in Section 3.25.070. The allowable number of bedrooms shall meet all applicable requirements under federal, state and city codes, including, but not limited to, the provisions of Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) governing “additional bedrooms” and all applicable building and construction codes in Title 8 of this code. A short-term vacation rental permit shall not issue for, or otherwise authorize the use of, additional bedrooms converted from non-bedroom spaces or areas in an existing residential dwelling except upon express city approval for the additional bedrooms in compliance with this code, including Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time), and upon approval of an application for a new or renewed short-term vacation rental permit as provided in subsection B. D. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if the property, or any building, structure, or use or land use on the property is in violation of this code. The city may conduct an inspection of the property prior to the issuance or renewal of a short-term vacation rental permit and/or business license. Code compliance inspections may be billed for full cost recovery at one hour for initial inspection and in thirty-minute increments for each follow-up inspection. For purposes of this subsection, a code violation exists if, at the time of the submittal of an application for a new or renewed short-term vacation rental permit or business license, the city has commenced administrative proceedings by issuing written communication and/or official notice to the owner or owner’s responsible agent or representative of one or more code violations. For purposes of this chapter, “building,” “structure,” and “use or land use” have the same meanings as set forth in Section 9.280.030 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. E. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if any portion of transient occupancy tax has not been reported and/or remitted to the city for the previous calendar year by the applicable deadline for the reporting and/or remittance of the transient occupancy tax. F. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if the residential dwelling to be used as a short-term rental unit lacks adequate onsite parking. For purposes of this subsection, “adequate onsite parking” shall be determined by dividing the total number of occupants commensurate with the approved number of bedrooms as provided in the table under Section 3.25.070 by four, such that the ratio of the total number of occupants to onsite parking spots does not exceed four to one (4:1). For example, a residential dwelling with five bedrooms may permissibly host a total number of ten occupants and therefore requires three on-site parking spots. Onsite parking shall be on an approved driveway, garage, and/or carport areas only in accordance with Section 3.25.070(R), and no more than two street parking spots may count towards the number of on-site parking spots necessary to meet the “adequate onsite parking” requirement under this subsection. 135 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 8 of 17 G. An owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative who claims not to be operating a short- term vacation rental unit or who has obtained a valid short-term vacation rental permit and business license pursuant to this chapter, may voluntarily opt-out of the requirements of this chapter, prior to the issuance or expiration of a short-term vacation rental permit and business license that are applicable to the short-term vacation rental unit, only upon the owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person executing, under penalty of perjury, a declaration of non-use as a short-term vacation rental unit, in a form prescribed by the city (for purposes of this chapter, a “declaration of non-use”). Upon the receipt and filing by the city of a fully executed declaration of non-use, the owner or owner’s authorized agent representative shall be released from complying with this chapter as long as the property is not used as a short-term vacation rental unit. Use of the property as a short-term vacation unit after the city’s receipt and filing of a declaration of non-use, is a violation of this chapter. If, after a declaration of non-use has been received and filed by the city, the owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative wants to use that property as a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner shall apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit and business license and fully comply with the requirements of this chapter and the code; provided, however, that if a short-term vacation rental permit is or will be suspended on the date an owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative submits to the city a declaration of non-use for the short-term vacation rental unit under suspension, then the owner may apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit and business license only after twelve (12) consecutive months have elapsed from the date of the declaration of non-use, and the owner and owner’s authorized agent or representative otherwise shall fully comply with the requirements of this chapter and the code. (Ord. 577 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.060 Short-term vacation rental permit—Application requirements. A. The owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative must submit the information required on the city’s short-term vacation rental permit application form provided by the city, which may include any or all of the following: 1. The name, address, and telephone number of the owner of the subject short-term vacation rental unit; 2. The name, address, and telephone number of the owner’s authorized agent or representative, if any; 3. The name, address, and twenty-four-hour telephone number of the local contact person; 4. The address of the proposed short-term vacation rental unit, Internet listing site and listing number; 5. The number of bedrooms shall not exceed the number of bedrooms allowable for the number of occupants as set forth in Section 3.25.070. The allowable number of bedrooms shall meet all applicable building and construction requirements under federal, state and city codes, including, but not limited to, the provisions of Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) governing “additional bedrooms” and all applicable building and construction codes in Title 8 of this code; 6. Acknowledgement of receipt of all electronically distributed short-term vacation rental information from the city, including any good neighbor brochure; 136 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 9 of 17 7. The owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative who has applied for a short-term vacation rental permit shall provide the city with written authorization that issuance of a short- term vacation rental permit pursuant to this chapter is not inconsistent with any recorded or unrecorded restrictive covenant, document, or other policy of a homeowner association (HOA) or other person or entity which has governing authority over the property on which a short-term vacation rental unit will be operated; in furtherance of this requirement, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that an owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative does not have written authorization for the issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit if a HOA or other person or entity which has governing authority over the property has submitted to the city a duly-authorized official writing, which informs the city that short-term vacation rentals of thirty (30) consecutive days or less are not permitted on the property applying for a short-term vacation rental permit; and 8. Such other information as the city manager or authorized designee deems reasonably necessary to administer this chapter. B. The short-term vacation rental permit application shall be accompanied by an application fee as set by resolution of the city council. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed while any check or other payment method cannot be processed for insufficient funds. C. The city may determine the maximum number of bedrooms in a residential dwelling with multiple bedrooms eligible for use as a short-term vacation rental unit upon issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit. When determining the maximum number of bedrooms eligible for use as short-term vacation rentals, the city shall consider the public health, safety, and welfare, shall comply with building and residential codes, and may rely on public records relating to planned and approved living space within the residential dwellings, including, but not limited to, title insurance reports, official county records, and tax assessor records. Owners of residential dwellings that exceed five thousand square feet of developed space on a lot may apply for additional bedrooms. An owner and/or owner’s authorized agent or representative may not advertise availability for occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit for more than the approved number of bedrooms listed in the short-term vacation rental permit issued by the city pursuant to this chapter. In addition to any other rights and remedies available to the city under this chapter, the first violation for failing to advertise the approved number of bedrooms may be subject to a fine by an administrative citation, and a second or subsequent violation for failing to advertise the approved number of bedrooms may result in a revocation (which may include permanent revocation) of the short-term vacation rental permit and/or any affiliated licenses or permits pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 3.25.100. D. A short-term vacation rental permit application may be denied if the applicant has failed to comply with application requirements in this chapter, or has had a prior short-term vacation rental permit for the same unit revoked within the past twelve (12) calendar months. In addition, upon adoption of a resolution pursuant to subsection H, the city may limit the number of short-term vacation rental units in a given geographic area based on a high concentration of short-term vacation rental units. The city shall maintain a waiting list of short-term vacation rental permit applications for such geographic areas where the city determines, based on substantial evidence after a noticed public hearing and public hearing, there is a higher than average concentration of short-term vacation rental units that either 137 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 10 of 17 affects the public health, safety, and welfare or significantly negatively impacts the character and standard of living in a neighborhood within that geographic area, or both. E. Short-term vacation rental permit applications may take up to, and the city shall have, thirty (30) calendar days to process. An application for a renewal of a short-term vacation rental permit and business license should be submitted at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the existing permit’s expiration to allow sufficient time for the city to process the renewal application. Nothing in this subsection or chapter shall be construed as requiring the city to issue or deny a short-term vacation rental permit in less than thirty (30) calendar days, as no permit shall be issued until such time as application review is complete. No short-term vacation rental use may occur in the city without a valid short-term vacation rental permit is issued in accordance with this chapter. F. Upon a change of ownership of a property (or upon a new person and/or new entity owning or controlling a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner of a property) licensed to operate as a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall notify the city of such change immediately. The existing short-term vacation rental permit shall be terminated and the property must cease operating as a short-term vacation rental immediately. Failure to comply may result in a fine of $1,000 per day for a continuing violation of this subsection F. G. Immediately upon a change of an owner’s authorized agent or representative, local contact, or any other change pertaining to the information contained in the short-term vacation rental application, the owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall update the short-term vacation rental unit’s online registration profile used by the city for the implementation of the short-term vacation rental regulations. Failure to update immediately this information may result in a violation of this chapter, including but not limited to a suspension or revocation of a short-term vacation rental permit, until all information is updated. H. The city manager or authorized designee shall prepare, for adoption by resolution by the city council, a review procedure and criteria to evaluate the limitation for issuance of STVR permits and/or STVR applications for geographic areas within the city as set forth in subsection D. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.070 Operational requirements and standard conditions. A. The owner and/or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the short-term vacation rental unit is used in a manner that complies with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short- term vacation rental unit. B. The responsible person(s) shall be an occupant(s) of the short-term vacation rental unit for which he, she or they signed a rental agreement for such rental, use and occupancy, and/or any person(s) occupying the short-term vacation rental unit without a rental agreement, including the owner, owner’s authorized agent or representative, local contact(s) and their guests. No non-permanent improvements to the property, such as tents, trailers, or other mobile units, may be used as short-term vacation rentals. The total number of occupants, including the responsible person(s), allowed to occupy any given short-term vacation rental unit may be within the ranges set forth in the table below. By the issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit, the city or its authorized designees, including 138 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 11 of 17 police, shall have the right to conduct a count of all persons occupying the short-term vacation rental unit in response to a complaint or any other legal grounds to conduct an inspection resulting from the use of the short-term vacation rental unit, and the failure to allow the city or its authorized designees the ability to conduct such a count may constitute a violation of this chapter. The city council may by resolution further restrict occupancy levels provided those restrictions are within the occupancy ranges set forth below. Number of Bedrooms Total of Overnight* Occupants Total Daytime** Occupants (Including Number of Overnight Occupants) 0 – Studio 2 2—8 1 2—4 2—8 2 4—6 4—8 3 6—8 6—12 4 8—10 8—16 5 10—12 10—18 6 12—14 12—20 7 14 14—20 8 16 16—22 9 18 18—24 * Overnight (10:01 p.m. – 6:59 a.m.) ** Daytime (7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.) C. The person(s) listed as the local contact person in the short-term vacation rental unit’s online registration profile shall be available twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week, with the ability to respond to the location within forty-five (45) thirty (30) minutes to complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit or their guests. The person(s) listed as a local contact person shall be able to respond personally to the location, or to contact the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative to respond personally to the location, within forty-five (45thirty (30) minutes of notification or attempted notification by the city or its authorized short-term vacation rental designated hotline service provider. No provision in this section shall obligate the city or its authorized short-term vacation rental designated hotline service provider to attempt to contact any person or entity other than the person(s) listed as the local contact person. D. The owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the occupants and/or guests of the short-term vacation rental unit do not create unreasonable or unlawful noise or disturbances, engage in disorderly conduct, or violate any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. 139 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 12 of 17 E. Occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit shall comply with the standards and regulations for allowable noise at the property in accordance with Section 9.100.210 and 11.08.040 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. No radio receiver, musical instrument, phonograph, compact disk player, loudspeaker, karaoke machine, sound amplifier, or any machine, device or equipment that produces or reproduces any sound shall be used outside or be audible from the outside of any short-term vacation rental unit between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time. Observations of noise related violations shall be made by the city or its authorized designee from any location at which a city official or authorized designee may lawfully be, including but not limited to any public right-of-way, any city-owned public property, and any private property to which the city or its authorized designee has been granted access. F. Prior to occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall: 1. Obtain the contact information of the responsible person; 2. Provide copies of all electronically distributed short-term vacation rental information from the city, including any good neighbor brochure to the responsible person and post in a conspicuous location within the short-term vacation rental unit, in a manner that allows for the information to be viewed in its entirety; and require such responsible person to execute a formal acknowledgement that he or she is legally responsible for compliance by all occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit and their guests with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the short-term vacation rental unit. This information shall be maintained by the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative for a period of three years and be made readily available upon request of any officer of the city responsible for the enforcement of any provision of this code or any other applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the short-term vacation rental unit. G. The owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person shall, upon notification or attempted notification that the responsible person and/or any occupant and/or guest of the short-term vacation rental unit has created unreasonable or unlawful noise or disturbances, engaged in disorderly conduct, or committed violations of any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit, promptly respond within forty-five (45thirty (30) minutes to immediately halt and prevent a recurrence of such conduct by the responsible person and/or any occupants and/or guests. Failure of the owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person to respond to calls or complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants and/or guests of the short-term vacation rental unit within forty-five (45thirty (30) minutes, shall be subject to all administrative, legal and equitable remedies available to the city. H. [reserved] I. Trash and refuse shall not be left stored within public view, except in proper containers for the purpose of collection by the city’s authorized waste hauler on scheduled trash collection days. The owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure compliance with all the provisions of Chapter 6.04 (Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. 140 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 13 of 17 J. Signs may be posted on the premises to advertise the availability of the short-term vacation rental unit as provided for in Chapter 9.160 (Signs) (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. K. The owner, authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person shall post a copy of the short-term vacation rental permit and a copy of the good neighbor brochure in a conspicuous place within the short-term vacation rental unit, and a copy of the good neighbor brochure shall be provided to each occupant of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. L. Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, the owner and/or the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall comply with all provisions of Chapter 3.24 concerning transient occupancy taxes, including, but not limited to, submission of a monthly return in accordance with Section 3.24.080 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, which shall be filed monthly even if the short-term vacation rental unit was not rented during each such month. M. Guesthouses, detached from the primary residential dwelling on the property, or the primary residential dwelling on the property, may be rented pursuant to this chapter as long as the guesthouse and the primary residential dwelling are rented to one party. N. The owner and/or the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall post the number of authorized bedrooms and the current short-term vacation rental permit number at the beginning or top of any advertisement that promotes the availability or existence of a short-term vacation rental unit. In the instance of audio-only advertising of the same, the short-term vacation rental permit number shall be read as part of the advertisement. O. The owner and/or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall operate a short-term vacation rental unit in compliance with any other permits or licenses that apply to the property, including, but not limited to, any permit or license needed to operate a special event pursuant to Section 9.60.170 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. The city may limit the number of special event permits issued per year on residential dwellings pursuant to Section 9.60.170 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time). P. The city manager, or designee, shall have the authority to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential secondary effects unique to the subject short-term vacation rental unit are avoided or adequately mitigated, including, but not limited to, a mitigating condition that would require the installation of a noise monitoring device to keep time-stamped noise level data from the property that will be made available to the city upon city’s reasonable request. Q. The standard conditions set forth herein may be modified by the city manager, or designee, upon request of the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative based on site-specific circumstances for the purpose of allowing reasonable accommodation of a short-term vacation rental. All requests must be in writing and shall identify how the strict application of the standard conditions creates an unreasonable hardship to a property such that, if the requirement is not modified, reasonable use of the property for a short-term vacation rental would not be allowed. Any hardships identified must relate to physical constraints to the subject site and shall not be self-induced or economic. Any modifications of the standard conditions shall not further exacerbate an already existing problem. R. On-site parking shall be on an approved driveway, garage, and/or carport areas only; this section does not impose restrictions on public street parking regulations. Recreational vehicles may be parked 141 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 14 of 17 in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 9.60.130 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. (Ord. 577 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.080 Recordkeeping and hosting platform duties. A. The owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall maintain for a period of three years, records in such form as the tax administrator (as defined in Chapter 3.24) may require to determine the amount of transient occupancy tax owed to the city. The tax administrator shall have the right to inspect such records at all reasonable times, which may be subject to the subpoena by the tax administrator pursuant to Section 3.24.140 (Records) (Transient Occupancy Tax) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. B. Hosting platforms shall not complete any booking transaction for any residential dwelling or other property purporting to be a short-term vacation rental unit in the city unless the dwelling or property has a current and valid short-term vacation rental permit issued pursuant to this chapter, which is not under suspension, for the dates and times proposed as part of the booking transaction. 1. The city shall maintain an online registry of active and suspended short-term vacation rental permits, which hosting platforms may reference and rely upon for purposes of complying with subsection B. If a residential dwelling or other property purporting to be a short-term vacation rental unit matches with an address, permit number, and/or current and valid permit dates (not under suspension) set forth in the city’s online registry, the hosting platforms may presume that the dwelling or other property has a current and valid short-term vacation rental permit. 2. The provisions of this subsection B shall be interpreted in accordance with otherwise applicable state and federal law(s) and will not apply if determined by the city to be in violation of, or preempted by, any such law(s). (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.090 Violations. A. Additional Conditions. A violation of any provision of this chapter or this code by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner’s authorized agent or representative, shall authorize the city manager, or designee, to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential additional violations are avoided. B. Permit Modification, Suspension and Revocation. A violation of any provision of this chapter, this code, California Vehicle Code, or any other applicable federal, state, or local laws or codes, including, but not limited to, applicable fire codes and the building and construction codes as set forth in Title 8 of this code, by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner’s authorized agent or representative, shall constitute grounds for modification, suspension and/or revocation (which may include permanent revocation) of the short-term vacation rental permit and/or any affiliated licenses or permits pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 3.25.100. C. Notice of Violation. The city may issue a notice of violation to any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner’s authorized agent or representative, or 142 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 15 of 17 hosting platform, pursuant to Section 1.01.300 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. D. Three Strikes Policy. Three violations of any provision of this chapter or this code within one (1) year by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner’s authorized agent or representative, with respect to any one residential dwelling will result in an immediate suspension of the short-term vacation rental permit with subsequent ability to have a hearing before the city, pursuant to this chapter, to request a lifting of the suspension. E. Administrative and Misdemeanor Citations. The city may issue an administrative citation to any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner’s authorized agent or representative, or hosting platform, pursuant to Chapter 1.09 (Administrative Citations) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. Nothing in this section shall preclude the city from also issuing an infraction citation upon the occurrence of the same offense on a separate day. An administrative citation may impose a fine for one or more violations of this chapter in the maximum amount allowed by state law or this code in which the latter amount shall be as follows: 1. General STVR Violations (Occupancy/Noise/Parking). a. First violation: five hundredone thousand dollars; b. Second violation: onetwo thousand dollars; c. Third violation: onethree thousand five hundred dollars. 2. Operating a STVR Without a Valid Short-Term Vacation Rental Permit. a. First violation: onethree thousand dollars; b. Second violation: one or more violations: five thousand five hundred dollars; c. Third violation: two thousand dollars. c. In addition to the fine set forth above, the first violation of operating a STVR without a valid short-term vacation rental permit shall be cause for an owner (or person and/or entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner of a property) to be prohibited for all time from being eligible to be issued a short-term vacation rental permit and/or business license for use of a property as a short-term vacation rental unit. 3. Hosting a Special Event at a STVR Without a Special Event Permit as Required by Section 9.60.170 (or Successor Provision, as May Be Amended From Time to Time) of This Code. a. First violation: five thousand dollars; b. Second violation: five thousand dollars. F. Public Nuisance. In addition to any and all rights and remedies available to the city, it shall be a public nuisance for any person or entity to commit, cause or maintain a violation of this chapter, which shall be subject to the provisions of Section 1.01.250 (Violations public nuisances) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. (Ord. 578 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 143 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 16 of 17 3.25.100 Appeals. A. Any person aggrieved by any decision of a city officer made pursuant to this chapter may request a hearing before the city manager in accordance with Chapter 2.08 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. B. Notwithstanding any provisions in Section 2.08.230 or otherwise in the code, the decision by the city manager of an appeal brought under this chapter shall be the final decision by the city for any violation of a short-term vacation rental permit issued under this order, except for any administrative citation imposing a fine, which shall be processed and subject to an administrative appeal pursuant to Chapter 1.09 of the code. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017) 144 Ordinance No. 586 Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 17 of 17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 586 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 1st day of December, 2020, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of December, 2020, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2015-023. _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on December 16, 2020, pursuant to Council Resolution. _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 145 146 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 587 ON SECOND READING AMENDING CHAPTER 12.69 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO GOLF CARTS AND LOW SPEED VEHICLES RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. 587 on second reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On December 1, 2020, Council introduced Ordinance No. 587 for first reading to amend Chapter 12.69 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) related to Golf Carts and Low Speed Vehicles. This code amendment encourages the use of golf carts and low speed vehicles as a safe alternate to conventional automobile use, and to connect residential and activity centers. FISCAL IMPACT – None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 6, 2020, Council received an update on the City’s current golf cart regulations and updated map showing routes and paths. On December 1, 2020, Council introduced Ordinance No. 587 for first reading to amend Chapter 12.69 of the LQMC related to Golf Carts and Low Speed Vehicles providing the following code amendments as recommended by Staff: Add “low speed vehicles” (LSVs) and related regulations in accordance with the Federal Motor Vehicles Safety Standard No. 500 (49 CFR 571.500); and Allow golf carts and LSVs to be electrically or gas powered; and Remove requirements for a covered passenger compartment; and Remove the two-passenger limit for golf carts and LSVs; and Upon the discretion of the City Manager or designee (City Engineer), golf cart routes shall be updated to allow golf carts and LSVs to share use of sidewalks that are at least 6 feet in width; and Remove permitting requirements for golf carts and LSVs. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 147 Council also approved the following additional amendments highlighted in yellow in Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 587:  Clarify mirror combination requirements for golf carts and LSVs; and  Clarify authorized person(s) who may operate a golf cart or LSV. ALTERNATIVES As Council approved this ordinance at first reading, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 148 ORDINANCE NO. 587 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12.69 OF TITLE 12 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO GOLF CARTS WHEREAS, Chapter 12.69 of Title 12 of the La Quinta Municipal Code relates to golf carts; and WHEREAS, the City Council received updates on the golf cart program regulations and map of routes and paths at the August 4, 2020 and October 6, 2020 meetings, and after review and consideration of this item, the City Council recommended amendments to the golf cart regulations to encourage the use of golf carts as a safe alternate to conventional automobile use, and to connect residential and activity centers; and WHEREAS, Chapter 12.69 of Title 12 of the La Quinta Municipal Code establishes standards and requirements for the implementation of the golf cart transportation plan in furtherance of the 2035 General Plan, adopted by the City Council at their regular meeting on February 19, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 12.69 shall be amended as written in “Exhibit A” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments to “Exhibit A” to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. 149 Ordinance No. 587 Amendments to Chapter 12.69 related to Golf Carts and Low Speed Vehicles Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 2 of 6 SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 15th day of December, 2020 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 150 Ordinance No. 587 Amendments to Chapter 12.69 related to Golf Carts and Low Speed Vehicles Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 3 of 6 EXHIBIT A Chapter 12.69 GOLF CARTS AND LOW SPEED VEHICLES 12.69.010 Purpose and intent. The California Streets and Highways Code Sections 1950 through 1961, authorize local jurisdictions to establish golf cart and low speed vehicle transportation plans within their boundaries, under certain conditions and with certain requirements. The city has established the golf cart transportation plan in its general plan and intends, by the addition of this chapter of the municipal code, to establish standards and requirements for the implementation of the golf cart and low speed vehicle transportation plan. (Ord. 559 § 1, 2017; Ord. 474 § 1, 2009) 12.69.020 Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meaning: “City” means the city of La Quinta. “Golf cart” means a four-wheeled electric motor vehicle with an unladen weight of less than one thousand three hundred pounds, which is designed to be, and is operated at not more than twenty-five miles per hour, and is designed to carry golf equipment and no more than two persons, including the driver. “Low speed vehicle” means a four-wheeled electric or gas powered vehicle with a gross vehicle weight of less than three thousand pounds, and is operated at not more than twenty- five miles per hour. Neighborhood electric vehicles are also known as low speed vehicles. Low speed and neighborhood electric vehicles can be designed to carry more than two passengers, including the driver. “Golf cart paths” or “golf cart routes” means all city-owned travel ways that now allow, or are added in the future as allowable golf cart and low speed vehicle travelways, including roadways. There shall be three categories of golf cart paths or routes: 1. Class I golf cart paths provide an area separate from the roadway used by automobile traffic for shared one-way or two-way golf carts, low speed vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, and equestrians. 2. Class II golf cart paths provide a striped eight-foot lane for one-way golf cart, low speed vehicle, and bicycle travel on a street or highway. 3. Class III golf cart paths provide for shared use with automobile and bicycle traffic. Class III paths are established by placing golf cart route signs along roadways with speed limits of twenty-five miles per hour or less in order to link them to Class I or Class II paths. “Golf cart path or route” means the map as it is revised from time to time depicting routes and crossings that exist or will be constructed, posted and designated for use by golf carts and low speed vehicles. (Ord. 559 § 1, 2017; Ord. 474 § 1, 2009) 151 Ordinance No. 587 Amendments to Chapter 12.69 related to Golf Carts and Low Speed Vehicles Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 4 of 6 12.69.030 Minimum design criteria for golf carts and low speed vehicles. All golf carts and low speed vehicles traveling on any golf cart path in the city must meet the following minimum design criteria: A. The golf cart or low speed vehicle may be electrically or gas powered. B. The golf cart or low speed vehicle must be equipped and safely operated with all of the following equipment: 1. Red reflectors; 2. Parking brake; 3. Horn; 4. Headlights, brake lights and rear lights; 5. Front and rear turn signal indicator lights; 6. Windshield; 7. Seat belts; 8. Mirror combination (left and right side mirrors, or left and rear mirrors, or multi- directional cross bar mirror) and unobstructed view to the rear from the driver’s seat (Ord. 559 § 1, 2017; Ord. 474 § 1, 2009) 12.69.040 Minimum safety criteria for operation of golf cart and low speed vehicle. All golf cart and low speed vehicle operators operating golf carts and low speed vehicles on any golf cart path in the city must conform to the following operator requirements and safety criteria: A. Golf cart operators must be licensed drivers in the state of California with valid California driver’s license, or have a valid driver’s license issued by a jurisdiction in accordance with Vehicle Code Sections 12502 through 12505. B. Golf cart operators must comply with the financial responsibility requirements (insurance) established pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 16000) of Division 7 of the California Vehicle Code. C. In addition to the requirements in Section 12.69.040 A. and B, above, low speed vehicle operators shall be equipped with a vehicle identification number (VIN) and comply with requirements pursuant to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 500 (49 CFR 571.500). D. Golf cart operators must maintain the golf cart in a safe condition and be properly loaded to conform with CVC Section 24002. F. Golf cart and low speed vehicle operators may only travel in those golf carts and low speed vehicles that meet the minimum design criteria required by Section 12.69.030. G. Golf carts and low speed vehicles are limited to daytime operation and are permitted on public streets only during the time period between one hour prior to sunrise and one hour after sunset. 152 Ordinance No. 587 Amendments to Chapter 12.69 related to Golf Carts and Low Speed Vehicles Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 5 of 6 H. Both driver and passenger of golf cart and low speed vehicle must wear safety belts at all times while the golf cart and low speed vehicle are being operated on Class I, II, or III golf cart paths. I. Golf cart and low speed vehicle operators must yield the right-of-way to pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians. J. Golf cart and low speed vehicle operators may only travel on designated golf cart routes or along streets with speed limits of twenty-five miles per hour or less. K. Golf cart and low speed vehicle operators may not travel on or along streets with speed limits in excess of twenty-five miles per hour except on designated golf cart routes, and shall only cross at controlled intersections as designated on the golf cart route map. L. Golf carts and low speed vehicles modified by removing any of the above safety equipment or a modification that in any way creates an unsafe vehicle will be subject to any violations that apply under the California Vehicle Code. Should a golf cart or low speed vehicle be impounded pursuant to a violation under the State Vehicle Code, the registered owner shall be subject to any regulations imposed by the impounding authority pursuant to Section 22850.5 of the California Vehicle Code. M. No person shall operate or move a golf cart or low speed vehicle upon a sidewalk except (1) those persons who in the course of their employment by a state, federal, or local government, (2) school district maintenance crew or personnel, (3) homeowner association maintenance crew or personnel, or (4) persons upon a sidewalk that is designated as a golf cart path. (Ord. 559 § 1, 2017; Ord. 474 § 1, 2009) 12.69.060 Golf cart routes. The city manager or designee shall have the authority to add or delete golf cart routes as the need arises or as conditions change in accordance with this chapter. (Ord. 559 § 1, 2017; Ord. 474 § 1, 2009) 12.69.070 Enforcement of golf cart plan. A. Any person operating a golf cart or low speed vehicle in the city in violation of this chapter is guilty of an infraction punishable as set forth in LQMC Sections 1.01.200 through 1.01.250 as applicable or as permitted by the California Vehicle Code. B. The city council finds and determines that the city shall provide law enforcement for the golf cart plan and enforce the rules and regulations of this chapter of the city of La Quinta Municipal Code, the Streets and Highways Code (Division 2.5, Chapter 6, Sections 1950 through 1961) and Section 21716 of the California Vehicle Code. The passage of the ordinance codified in this chapter enables the city to enforce this program’s provisions not found in the California Vehicle Code. (Ord. 559 § 1, 2017; Ord. 474 § 1, 2009) 153 Ordinance No. 587 Amendments to Chapter 12.69 related to Golf Carts and Low Speed Vehicles Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 6 of 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 587 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 1st day of December, 2020, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of December, 2020, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2015-023. _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on December 16, 2020, pursuant to Council Resolution. _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 154 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE AS CITY REPRESENTATIVES ON VARIOUS OUTSIDE AGENCIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021 RECOMMENDATION Appoint Members of the City Council to serve as City representatives on various local, regional, and state committees for calendar year 2021. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  Each year, the Council appoints Councilmembers to serve on various local, regional, and state committees.  Attachment 1 is the list of committees, their meeting schedules, and the 2020 representatives and alternates. Committees that offer stipends are identified with an asterisk (*). FISCAL IMPACT Attendance at some meetings requires Councilmembers to incur reimbursable travel costs that could include mileage, airfare, meals, and/or overnight hotel stays. Travel costs for the first half of 2020 are included in the 2020/21 budget (account no. 101-1001-60320). For meetings scheduled in the latter half of 2021, the costs will be included in the 2021/22 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City is involved in various government committees relating to local, regional, and state affairs. The City Council may appoint one or more of its members to these committees or may appoint a citizen to represent the City. When appointing a Councilmember, the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) [FPPC Regulation 18702.5] allows an elected official to vote on his/her own appointment to another public agency’s board, committee or commission if the appropriate form [Form 806 – Agency Report of: Public Official Appointments] is posted disclosing any compensation received. This form is posted on the City’s website and will be immediately updated following this meeting. If Council opts to select a citizen representative, the City Clerk will seek applicants for that position. BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 155 ALTERNATIVES The Council may opt to make new appointments to some or all positions; discontinue membership in one or more committees; and/or change membership on one or more committees to a citizen representative. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. 2020 Committee Appointment List 156 2020 Assignments APPOINTED DECEMBER 17, 2019 * Note: receives stipendAGENCY MEETING SCHEDULE 2020 REPRESENTATIVES Animal Campus Commission 2nd Thursday, quarterly at 9:30 am (2020: Feb 6, May 7, Aug 6, Nov 5) Member: Steve Sanchez Alternate: Kathleen Fitzpatrick California Joint Powers Insurance Authority* Annual meeting in July Member: Robert Radi Alternate: Chris Escobedo / Angela Scott Greater CV Chamber of Commerce Information Exchange Committee Councilmembers rotate – 2nd Thursday of the month at 8:30 am 1st quarter – Kathleen Fitzpatrick 2nd quarter – Steve Sanchez 3rd quarter – John Peña 4th quarter – Robert Radi Civic Center Art Purchase Committee Yearly, meet during the March art festival (March 2019) Members: Councilmembers Peña & Sanchez; CS Commission Members: 2 CVAG General Assembly Annual banquet – last Monday in June in Chair’s city (June 29, 2020 at 6 pm) Delegate: Mayor Evans Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Peña Members: All Councilmembers CVAG Conservation Commission* 2nd Thursday of each month at 11 am (dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Member: Mayor Evans Alternate: Kathleen Fitzpatrick CVAG Energy & Environmental Resources Committee*2nd Thursday of each month at 12 pm (dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Member: Mayor Evans Alternate: Kathleen Fitzpatrick CVAG Executive Committee* Last Monday of each month at 4:30 pm (dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec, & Jan) Member: Mayor Evans Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Peña (rotating) CVAG Public Safety Committee* 2nd Monday of each month at 9 am (2020: dark Mar, Apr, Jul, Aug, Oct, Dec) Member: John Peña Alternate: Steve Sanchez CVAG Transportation Committee* 1st Monday of each month at 10 am (dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Member: Robert Radi Alternate: Kathleen Fitzpatrick CVAG Homelessness Committee* 3rd Wednesday of each month at 10 am (2019/20; dark Mar, July, Aug, Oct, & Dec) Member: John Peña Alternate: Kathleen Fitzpatrick Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy (CVMC)* 2nd Monday, every other month at 3 pm (2019: Jan 14, Mar 11, May 13, Jul 8, Sept 9, Nov 4) Member: Kathleen Fitzpatrick Alternate: John Peña Coachella Valley Unified School District 2x2 Committee [established 11/03/2015] TBD Members: Kathleen Fitzpatrick & John Peña ATTACHMENT 1157 2020 Assignments APPOINTED DECEMBER 17, 2019 * Note: receives stipendCommunity Service Grant Review Committee Three per year: January, May & September January Members: Peña / Fitzpatrick May Members: Radi / Sanchez September Members: Mayor Evans / Peña Coachella Valley Water District Joint Policy CommitteeAs needed – TBD Member: Mayor Evans Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Peña (rotating) Desert Sands Unified School District 2x2 Committee [established June 2013] Three to four meetings per year Members: Steve Sanchez & Robert Radi Desert Recreation District 2x2 Committee [established Jan. 2017] TBD Members: Kathleen Fitzpatrick & Robert Radi Economic Development Subcommittee [established May 20, 2014] Meet twice a month; every 2nd Thursday and 4th Wednesday at 4 p.m. Members: Mayor Evans & Mayor Pro Tem Peña (rotating) Alternate: Steve Sanchez Greater Palm Springs Convention & Visitors Bureau* Fridays at 8 am at rotating locations (2020: Jan 24, Mar 27, May 29, June 26, Sept 25, Nov 20; dark in Feb, April, July, Aug, Oct, & Dec) Members: Mayor Evans Alternate: Robert Radi IID Energy Consumers’ Advisory Committee (ECAC) 1st Monday of every month at 6 pm Member: Mayor Pro Tem PeñaMember: Lee Osborne Alternate: none (IID does not recognize alternates) League of California Cities - Delegate for annual conference Annual conference(s) & General Assembly October 7-9, 2020, Long Beach, CA Member: Mayor Evans Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Peña League of California Cities -Transportation, Communication and Public Works Policy Committee Three meetings per year (2020: Jan 23, April 2, & June 4) Member: Steve Sanchez League of California Cities - Public Safety Committee Three meetings per year (2020: Jan 24,April 3, & June 5)) Member: John Peña Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)*[one rep appointed by every city]2nd Wednesday of each month at 9:30 am Member: Kathleen Fitzpatrick Alternate: Robert Radi Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) 4th Thursday of each month (dark Aug & Nov 2020) Member: Steve Sanchez So. Calif. Association of Governments (SGAC) Annual Regional Conference & General Assembly 2020: May 5-7 at 9 am, Desert Springs Marriott, Palm Desert Delegate: Mayor Evans Alternate: Kathleen Fitzpatrick Sunline Transit Agency* 4th Wednesday of each month at 12 noon (dark Aug & Nov 2020) Member: Robert Radi Alternate: John Peña 158 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AMENDEMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH FIND FOOD BANK FOR FOOD DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS RELATED TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Contract Services with FIND Food Bank, in the amount of $60,000, for food distribution programs related to the COVID-19 pandemic; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •In March 2020, FIND Food Bank (FIND) and the City discussed the need to increase food distribution in La Quinta due to the onset of the COVID- 19 pandemic. •In July 2020, the City entered into an agreement with FIND to provide funding to support food distribution to seniors, low/fixed income residents and those in need. •FIND has requested additional funding to continue food distribution through the 2021 calendar year. •On December 9, 2020, Council appropriated $60,000 to continue support of the food distribution programs; approval of Amendment No. 1 (Attachment 1) continues the partnership with FIND. FISCAL IMPACT Funds were appropriated on December 9, 2020 and are available in the 2020/21 General Fund budget as a contribution to other agencies with the Grants Accounts (Account No. 101-3001-60510). BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 4 159 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In March of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created a surge for needed food resources for residents in La Quinta. The food insecurity affected homebound and isolated seniors, adults and families who lost stable jobs, and children who lost access to free/reduced meals due to school closures. It was during this time that the City entered into a partnership with FIND and provided $40,000 to support the following: •An increase in service to La Quinta through 7 additional large and small format free Community Mobile Market sites; and •Direct service to low/fixed income senior housing complexes; and •Increased free food distributions from 1 to 11 per month; and •Increased the amount of food distributed in La Quinta from 120,721 lbs. in 2019 to 692,609 lbs. from January 1 to November 30, 2020. FIND is requesting an additional $60,000 (Attachment 2) to continue supporting the increased programmatic expansion of food distributions through the end of 2021. This funding will help support food insecure residents of La Quinta as the economy continues to recover through the end of next year. ALTERNATIVES - None. Prepared by: Christina Calderon, Community Resources Manager Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director Attachments: 1.Amendment No. 1 to Contract Services Agreement with FIND Food Bank 2.FIND proposal 160 Rev. 7/28/2017 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FIND FOOD BANK This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”) to Contact Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the ______ day of December, 2020 ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation and FIND FOOD BANK, a non-profit organization (“Contracting Party”). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about July 8, 2020, the City and Contracting Party entered into an Agreement to provide non-perishable food kits to homebound seniors and La Quinta residents for the City in a total not to exceed amount of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000). The term of the Agreement expires on June 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Contract Sum is being amended by an additional Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000), for total not to exceed amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) under the Agreement; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.Section 2.1 Contract Sum is amended to read as follows: Section 2.1 – Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement for Fiscal Year 20/21, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with “Exhibit B” (the “Schedule of Compensation”) in a total amount not to exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) (the “Contract Sum”), except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the Services, payment for time and materials based upon Contracting Party’s rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or ATTACHMENT 1 161 Rev. 7/28/2017 such other reasonable methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. In all other respects, the original Agreement shall remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement on the respective dates set forth below. CITY OF LA QUINTA FIND FOOD BANK a California municipal corporation a Non-Profit Organization ____ ____ JON McMILLEN, City Manager DEBBIE ESPINOSA City of La Quinta, California President/CEO Dated: Dated: ATTEST: ____ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 162 Rev. 7/28/2017 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is not to exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) (“Contract Sum”) for Fiscal Year 2020/21: Original Agreement: $40,000 Amendment No. 1: $60,000 Total Contract Sum: $100,000 The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in one lump sum of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000) upon execution of Amendment 1. 163 164 City of La Quinta and FIND Food Bank: Programmatic Food Distribution Funding Support Proposal Background – Pre COVID As the desert’s regional food bank, FIND Food Bank provides healthy food and outreach assistance to food insecure residents of the Coachella Valley Desert Region. As such, the importance of equitable healthy food distribution is key to achieving our goals of ending hunger in our area. FIND consistently uses meaningful data to help us understand the density of food insecure individuals by city. To help quantify community need, FIND uses the percent of children attending school in La Quinta, who qualify for the federal Free and Reduced-Price Meal (FRPM) program. The total number of La Quinta students qualifying, according to California Board of Education, 2019/20 Student Poverty FRPM Data, is 4,912 children or 65% of all La Quinta students. Since 2016, FIND Food Bank has been partnering with Desert Recreation District to bring free healthy food and client based outreach service resources to the city of La Quinta. Through FIND’s Community Mobile Market program offered once per month in the Old Town La Quinta / La Quinta Cove area, FIND has been able to distribute over 100,000lbs of free food regularly to the community. In CY 2019, the amount FIND Food Bank distributed was a total of 120,721 pounds of food with nearly half as fresh produce. However, in CY 2020, the state of food insecurity in the city of La Quinta, along with the entire Coachella Valley Desert region drastically changed with the economic impact of COVID-19. COVID-19 Impact on Food Distribution to Food Insecure residents of La Quinta In the month of March 2020, the COVID-19 disaster created an immediate surge in La Quinta residents in need. The pandemic affected not only those who had already been receiving services from FIND, but also a new group of residents who are now facing food insecurity as well - including homebound and isolated seniors, adults who lost stable jobs, and children who lost access to free and reduced meals due to school closures as well saw a decrease in food supplies at home due to their family income being affected by job losses. ATTACHMENT 2 165 It was at this time that, FIND received funding support from the City of La Quinta to ensure that with the increased need in food assistance, food distributions could also increase to support the community needs and literally ensure that people would not starve as the pandemic’s economic effects continued pressing forward. With the support and partnership of the City of La Quinta, FIND was able to: - increase their service to La Quinta by adding 7 additional large and small format free Community Mobile Market sites (including direct service to low income and fixed income senior housing complexes). - increased free food distributions from 1 distribution to 11 distributions per month - and increased the amount of food distributed in La Quinta from 120,721lbs in CY 2019 to 692,609 lbs from Jan 1,2020-Nov 30, 2020 (11 months). This represents an increase of 82% lbs distributed. By end of December 2020, FIND projects that the percentage increase will be closer to an 85% increase (with almost 1/2 of the food distributed in the form of Fresh Produce). People in Need Data (2020 Service number comparisons) Using February 2020 people served by FIND Food Bank’s LQ distribution as the pre-covid baseline for comparison, at the highest month, FIND served an increase of over 87.5% of people needing food assistance. The monthly La Quinta service numbers are as follows: Feb 2020 households: 225 People: 830 March households: 726 People: 3338 April Households: 1263 People: 4545 May households: 1707 People: 6624 June* households: 442 People: 690 July * households: 545 People: 1194 August Households: 1,405 People: 5,299 September Households: 1,730 People: 6,309 October Households:1,517 People: 6,086 *months where the $600 unemployment stipends were being issued 166 Proposal FIND Food Bank respectfully requests $60,000 to ensure that FIND can continue the increased programmatic expansion of food distributions through the end of CY 2021 in the City of La Quinta. From the review of economic impact provided by Feeding America and their University research partners, including Stanford, food insecurity rates will continue to be impacted through minimally CY 2021 and into the first quarter of 2022. This funding will ensure that there will be sustained food distributions to support the food insecure residents of La Quinta as the economy continues to recover through the end of next year. Expanded food distribution sites that will continue to have programmatic food distribution services until the end of 2021 through this grant include: Large Format Free Community Mobile Market Sites: - LQ Desert Recreation Center - LQ Desert Recreation Center, Senior specific - La Quinta High School, (site may be moved to another location in LQ depending on DSUSD status) Small Format Free Community Mobile Market Mobile Sites: - Hadley Villas - Washington St. Apts. - Wolf Waters - Coral Mountain Program Details Community Mobile Markets FIND’s Community Mobile Markets are comprised of specialized or converted refrigerated beverage trucks that are filled at the FIND warehouse with a wide variety of fresh produce, frozen meat, refrigerated products, dairy, bakery, and dry goods designed to provide supplemental food assistance. Each Mobile Market truck may deliver up to 10,000 pounds of foods. While typically, at each distribution site, FIND staff works with site volunteers to set up tables, unload the food items and distribute the healthy foods to members of the community, the COVID-19 pandemic has necessarily changed our methodologies, and the logistics required to safely serve all people have required swift accommodations. 167 The World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control’s mandates for “social distancing” have been strategically accommodated at all of FIND Food Bank’s food distributions. All Free Community Mobile Market distributions have been tailored to observe the social distancing mandates. For example, FIND utilizes open air parking lots where FIND can monitor the number of people in the distribution line and maintain social distance, or where people may remain in their cars until they are called in small groups to receive food. In addition, FIND has piloted “drive through” food distributions where lines of cars wait and food is distributed “contact free” by FIND staff and volunteers. Amid the social distancing directives, FIND’s critical volunteers have been replaced with the National Guard, the California Conservation Corps and the Civil Air Patrol. FIND Food Bank also now utilizes masks, gloves, vests, pop-up tents, tables, clipboards, signage, traffic cones and many other items to preserve the safety of our clients, to meet the requirements for social distancing, and to help manage the ever-increasing lines of people in need. FIND Outreach Teams In addition, the FIND Community Mobile Market Program also provides important connections to resources to enhance household stability and sustainability including CalFresh (food stamps), unemployment benefits, Women, Infants and Children federal assistance nutrition program (WIC), free and reduced-price medical and preventative health programs, rental and utility assistance, and other social services. FIND has two outreach teams: CalFresh Outreach Coordinators and Community Health Workers. Outreach team members are at each distribution and assist clients in submitting multiple, public-benefit program applications. The barriers to accessing these benefits are many and complex, and often deter eligible individuals from applying. Acknowledgement of Gift: FIND has confirmed that April 9, 2021 will be the date for its 11th annual Telethon. Should this grant be approved by the City of La Quinta, FIND respectfully requests that it be allowed to acknowledge it as part of its Telethon. FIND would also request that it be allowed to acknowledge the gift through its website and social media platforms as a thank you to the City of La Quinta for its support and partnership in feeding the residents in need in La Quinta. 168 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE MODIFIED COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS EMERGENCY ECONOMIC RELIEF PROGRAM FOR LA QUINTA BUSINESSES IMPACTED BY COVID-19 RECOMMENDATION Approve modified COVID-19 Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Program for La Quinta businesses impacted by COVID-19 and the December 3, 2020 State of California Regional Stay Home Order. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •In March 2020, City Council established a $1.5 million COVID-19 Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Program (Program) to help mitigate the adverse economic impacts on local businesses due to COVID-19. •As of December 10, 2020, all awards from the Program combined have provided $ 1,133,400.32 in loans and rebates to 88 businesses. •As part of Round III, the Program provided rebates for lease/mortgage and utilities to over 55 affected businesses impacted by State Mandates that occurred beginning July 2020, providing $378,564.97. •Staff proposes to modify the Program to offer further relief to businesses impacted by the State mandated closures caused by the December 3, 2020 Regional Stay Home Order. FISCAL IMPACT The Program was established with a $1.5 million appropriation utilizing funds from the Economic Disaster Emergency Reserve, and received an additional appropriation of $500,000 on December 9, 2020, bringing the total budget to $2 million. The Program has expended $1,133,400, of which was $109,064 of Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act funding independently secured and has a remaining budget of $975,663. BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 5 169 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On March 16, Riverside County Public Health Officer, Dr. Cameron Kaiser, ordered all County residents to stay at home to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. In addition, all non-essential businesses were directed to remain closed. The City recognizes that COVID-19 has put a difficult burden on our small business community. As a response to this unprecedented challenge, on March 25, 2020, the Council authorized the appropriation of up to $1.5 million from the City’s economic disaster reserves and directed staff to bring back for Council consideration a program offering micro-loans or similar relief to assist local businesses affected by the COVID-19 local emergency. On October 20, 2020, the Council approved a modification of the program for rent relief efforts to be expanded for relief of August 2020 lease/mortgage and utilities for businesses impacted by the July 13, 2020, State mandate to close indoor activities of certain businesses. Rounds I and II: The City provided zero interest loans to eligible businesses beginning at $5,000 and up to $20,000. Rounds I and II awarded $500,000 to 51 businesses. Round III (Revised last on October 20, 2020): The City provided a Rebate Program (R-Program) for La Quinta businesses with a physical storefront for investments in safety measures as part of the statewide industry guidance. The R-Program was revised to include lease/mortgage and utilities reimbursement for restaurants and other businesses affected by the State mandated closure of indoor activities that occurred on July 1 and July 13, 2020. The application period for this relief closed on November 23, 2020. The R-Program provided 55 different businesses, a total of $378,564 in reimbursement for their July and August 2020 rent and utility expenses. Proposed Program Revisions: 1.Place a maximum amount any one business can receive from grants and reimbursements awarded through this program at $50,000. 2.Offer relief in the form of a grant to eligible businesses with a maximum amount of up to $10,000 to be used for eligible expenses related to business operations including, but not limited to; lease/mortgage and utilities, inventory, and other standard operational expenses. 3.Businesses must provide YTD Profit/Loss statement for 2019 and 2020 up to October 30 as proof of hardship. 4.Businesses must provide information regarding the eligible expense they intend to apply their relief toward. 170 5.Businesses must be in compliance with State orders, and in good standing with the City of La Quinta. Those that have received prior awards are eligible for this relief. If approved, eligible businesses can start submitting applications online through the application portal at www.laquintaca.gov/covid19businessloan on Friday, December 18, 2020 at 8:00 a.m.; the application deadline will be Monday, January 25, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. All applications will be processed on a first-come, first-served basis. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to approve the revisions to the program. Prepared by: Doug Kinley, Management Specialist Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 171 172 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION Discuss Short-Term Vacation Rental Program Ad Hoc Committee commendations. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  The City has continuously sought improvements of its short-term vacation rental program (STVR Program) to maintain a balance between ensuring residents’ quality of life and property owners’ ability to host short-term vacation rentals (STVRs).  STVR Program Ad-Hoc Committee (Committee) was formed to review the STVR Program and prepare recommendations for Council’s review and consideration; the Committee’s comprehensive recommendations are provided in this update. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In October of 2012, the City adopted STVR regulations to maintain balance between ensuring residents’ quality of life and property owners’ ability to host STVRs. Over the years, the STVR regulations have been updated to provide clarity, streamline processes, and provide more enforcement tools for STVR Program compliance. STVR Program Ad-Hoc Committee In November 2019, Council approved the formation of a Committee tasked to review the STVR Program, including current regulations, application and permit/licensing process, compliance and enforcement, outreach and marketing, and make advisory recommendations to Council; and on February 3, 2020, Council appointed 15 individuals to serve on the Committee for a period of one year. The Committee created four subcommittees to focus on: 1) Enforcement/Compliance – examine code compliance improvements, fines, and other recommendations relating to compliance; STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 173 2) Density/Over-concentration – examine occupancy limits within a STVR property (maximum number of persons for daytime and overnight), density/over-concentration of STVR properties by neighborhood, zone, or defined geographic area; 3) Marketing – review current marketing materials (website, good neighbor brochure, community outreach and education, conduct a survey, and review City branding for the Program); and 4) Permitting – examine types of licenses/permits, minimum duration of stays, notification of neighbors, and home inspection requirements. Committee Recommendations The Committee reviewed and discussed each of the subcommittee’s recommendations, and on December 3, 2020, the Committee concluded its deliberations and approved the final comprehensive recommendations (Attachment 1). The Chair and Vice Chair of the Committee, Gavin Schutz and Michelle McDonough respectively, will present the recommendations at this meeting. For ease of reference, the Committee recommendations are organized in a table format and are color-coded to show: 1) staff recommends implementing or implementation is underway, 2) recommendation has been incorporated into the recent Code update, and 3) for further discussion and consideration (Attachment 2). blue – staff has already implemented, recommends implementing, or implementation is underway; green – recommendation has been incorporated in the recent Code update; yellow – for further discussion and consideration; white – staff does not recommend. Staff anticipates to bring forward density recommendations for Council review and consideration in January 2021. Currently underway are efforts to implement robust and comprehensive monitoring and reporting through Deckard Technologies, which will enable Staff to monitor STVR units within defined geographic areas and review concentrations within those areas. Prepared by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. STVR Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations 2. Table of Recommendations – color-coded 174  Page 1 of 24 City of La Quinta STVR Committee  Recommendations on Enforcement      This report contains specific recommendations adopted by the Ad Hoc STVR Committee. Only  enforcement  recommendations  are  addressed  here  –  additional  recommendations  will  be  presented as they are addressed by the Committee.       The overall issues surrounding enforcement can be divided into three main groups:         Each  of  these  groups  contain  issues  that  must  be  addressed  as  part  of  a  comprehensive  enforcement process.     This document provides a starting point for the Committee in identifying the main enforcement  issues. It provides a brief discussion on each issue and outlines recommendations that will  provide a solution to that specific issue. In some cases, a single recommendation may provide  solutions to several problems (for example, trained and dedicated enforcement personnel).  Finally, the document provides a priority matrix for discussion on suggested prioritization of  recommendations.    Sourcing for this document comes directly from the original list (“Lori List”) of issues identified  by the Committee at its first meeting. Only issues relating directly to enforcement are covered  here:  other  discussion  topics  not  related  to  enforcement  are  outside  the  scope  if  this  subcommittee.     Issues before an enforcement event:  • Communicating with the City / Verifying a Complaint  • STVR Homeowner not Registering with the City  • STVR Owner not aware of the rules  • Renters not aware of the rules  • Neighbors (or community at large) not aware of the rules  • Knowledge level or outsourced services      The enforcement event:  • No contact with Owner / Representative  • Noise / behavior / party events  ATTACHMENT 1 175 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 2 of 24    • Occupancy Limit violations  • Parking  • Trash  • Sensitive neighbors    After the enforcement event:  • Repeat offenders / 3 Strikes      Issues before an enforcement event    Issue:    Communicating with the City / Verifying a complaint    Discussion:  STR Owner/Managers and homeowners have expressed frustration with the City  hotline. The hotline is often unmanned in times of most critical need. Even when  manned the latency between phoning in and having an issue addressed is often  hours  (sometimes  longer).  Frequently,  because  of  this  delay,  the  issue  being  reported resolves itself before the City responds, but after a homeowner has  endured  several  hours  of  pain.  When  it  eventually  responds,  the City may  therefore find no evidence of any issues, resulting in a false negative incident  report, frustrating homeowners and leading to inaccurate violation statistics.     Anecdotal evidence indicates this tends to be a bigger issue in STVR properties  that are managed by non‐resident owners (i.e. management companies). Also, if  the City calls property management (starting the clock on the 45‐minute rule) it  simply hands off, and little or no follow up checking is done with the reporting  homeowner (or STVR Owner) to confirm the issue is resolved. Also, in the case of  STVR owners employing property managers, sometimes the actual owner doesn’t  even know there has been a complaint.     Effective and timely communications between STVR property owners, renters and  neighbors with respect to notification and enforcement represents a critical path  in getting the community to work together harmoniously.     Recommendation:   Staff the hotline with live, (local, trained) personnel who are familiar with La  Quinta geography and empowered and equipped to initiate complaint  resolution immediately.    Increase field enforcement staffing by at least two additional full time STVR  trained officers available for immediate dispatch during times of need.   Hotline and enforcement staff should be dynamically managed: more staff  when the hotline is heavily used (evenings and weekends) and less staffing at  times when complaints tend to be low (weekday mornings and afternoons).  176 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 3 of 24     Require a code inspection be performed on a property prior to granting an  STVR license. This inspection should be for the purposes of verifying accuracy  with respect to the application, particularly in the areas of occupancy limits  (number of bedrooms) and living arrangements (room conversions, etc.).     Issue:    STVR Homeowner not Registering with the City    Discussion:  A significant number of homeowners who rent property do not register with the  City, thereby avoiding paying fees, oversight and TOT. Enforcement of the City  mandate requiring STVR owners to register is difficult as the City is often unaware  of their business unless a complaint is filed against the property.     Recommendation:   Require that a City of La Quinta STVR permit number be included in all  property advertisements on all platforms (VRBO, print, web, etc.).    Publicize  the  registration  requirements  regularly  on  the  web  site  and  through social media outlets.    Include mail inserts to all residents in any surface mailings sent out to  residents.   Where  possible,  partner  with  HOA  communities  and  Management  Companies to exchange information on STVR rental activities.   Assess significant monetary penalties for non‐compliance. These penalties  must be paid before an STVR license can be obtained.       Issue:    STVR Owner not aware of the rules    Discussion:   Some owner/operators/managers do not read the relevant statutes/ordinances  governing how properties may be rented even though this is a requirement of  registration.    Recommendation:   Applicants, any individuals listed as contacts for the property, and any  designated Management Company representatives who directly manage a  property must attend a compulsory workshop prior to the issuance of  permits. Applicants must sign a document asserting they have attended  the workshop, understand the rules and agree to be bound by them.   STVR Owners, any individuals listed as contacts for the property, and any  designated  Management  Company  representatives  who  are  directly  responsible for managing a property that has been assessed a violation  must retake the compulsory workshop at their own expense before a  license for that property can be renewed.   177 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 4 of 24     This training workshop should also be open to the public so tha t interested  parties  (neighbors,  potential  new  STVR  licensees)  can  familiarize  themselves with the requirements and responsibilities of STVR ownership.   False advertising (i.e. number of bedrooms, sleeping capacity, occupancy  limits) will result in a citation, and count as a strike against the property.    Issue:    Renters not aware of the rules    Discussion:  Many renters who occupy STVR units are not aware of the rules for conduct or  behavior. While the City ordinance requires STVR owners to provide a copy of the  relevant documents, they are often ignored by many renters. When renters first  occupy the property, it is often not their priority to stop and read documents. In  many cases, the renters only become aware of the rules after they have caused a  disruption with neighbors, which is too late.     Recommendation:   The City require the property owner/manager assert that a renter has been  provided  with  all  current  City  ordinances  governing  expected  behavior  in  advance of allowing that renter to occupy the property.     A condensed copy of the relevant ordinance(s) must be permanently fixed to  a prominent location inside the property. This document will be generated by  the City and outline the relevant rules in plain language.    Update and strengthen the “Good Neighbor” brochure to include specific  language relating to noise and personal behavior requirements. Require a  copy be included as part of every rental agreement.   Changes to City ordinances, including adoption of temporary orders must be  posted in a prominent location inside the property within 48 hours of adoption,  and before the property can be rented again.       Issue:    Neighbors not aware of the rules    Discussion:  Neighbors are often ill‐informed about the specifics regarding STVR rules and  ordinances that affect them. Many have unreasonable expectations regarding ill‐ defined and vaguely defined concepts such as “quiet enjoyment” and what exactly  constitutes “noise levels of greater than 60dBA”. Differences between daytime  and nighttime restrictions are also not well understood. (Note this issue may also  apply to STVR owners and renters). Parking requirements and trash pickup rules  are  sometimes  not  clear  (and  may conflict  with  HOA  rules  in  managed  communities). For example, some communities require parking in the driveway  before street parking may be used.     178 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 5 of 24    Another example is many neighbors have expectations that any audible noise is  cause for complaint. Some are unaware of the 10:00 p.m. curfew on amplified  noise, while others believe that any noise after 10:00 p.m. is unacceptable.     Recommendation:   ALL neighbors adjacent to (on all sides) and across the street from an STVR  property be notified by the city and supplied with the same documents the  Owner is required to furnish to the renter. (This could be a requirement placed  on the STVR owner if the City feels it is appropriate – as long as the neighbor  gets the information). These documents must include:  o A copy of the City STVR Ordinance  o A Copy of the “Good Neighbor” brochure  o Contact information for complaints to the City.  o Contact information for the Property owner and the Property Manager  if applicable.  o A link to the City STVR website where interim rule changes are posted.    These documents should be refreshed annually as part of the license renewal  process.   A document should be provided to the neighbor explaining the meaning of any  technical terms. Where possible real‐life examples should be used to illustrate  the terms used. This document should be provided to renters as well.    The Enforcement Event      Issue:    No contact with Owner/Representative    Discussion:   In cases where a complaint is received by the City, the current process is to call  the STVR owner or property management representative. This begins a 45‐minute  clock as required by the City ordinance. In the event the City is unable to contact  the responsible party within a 45‐minute window, the escalation process is to  report the issue to RCS and handoff to them. This process has proven ineffective  as the RCS often takes significant time to respond – if at all. In the meantime, the  City has no way of verifying the complaint, and the neighbor continues to endure  the problem.     The issue seems to predominantly affect STVR properties where there is a non‐ resident or externally managed property (needs to be verified by City statistics).    While a fine may be issued to the STVR property owner after the 45‐minute  window has expired, this does not help at all with enforcement of the actual issue  being reported. In addition, the fine may be dismissed as simply a “cost of doing  179 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 6 of 24    business” by the property owner and absorbed by them (or passed on to the  offending renter if possible).     Recommendation:   Implement an escalation process whereby if the first call to the designated  contact goes unanswered within a 30‐minute window, a call is made to RSO  and a mandatory citation is issued.   As  described  above,  increase  the  number  of  trained  and  dedicated  enforcement personnel to levels that can actively address the situation with  or without the homeowner / property manager.     Issue:    Noise/ Behavior/Party events    Discussion:  Noise and behavior related disturbances represent a significant portion of overall  complaints (need to incorporate City data). Also, these complaints tend to be  high profile and very visible in the community, as they potentially impact all  neighbors surrounding the property and interfere directly with neighborhood  quality of life.     Often there is a three‐way knowledge gap (STVR homeowner, renter and neighbor)  about exactly how much noise is too much, and what conduct is acceptable during  daylight or nighttime hours. City and county statues/ordinances are definitive and  objective in this regard, however they are of little use as they rely on technical  specifications such as dB(A) ratings etc., and do not supply enough guidance for  measurement. This leads to deeply subjective interpretation of the relevant rules  and unrealistic expectations from neighbors about exactly how much noise is  acceptable.     Recommendation:   A  document  should  be  prepared  and  provided  to  all  parties  clarifying  definitively  the  meaning  of  any  technical  measurements  and  how these  measurements should be interpreted. (See also above).   Enforcement personnel should be provided with and trained to use relevant  noise level meters and other tools that enhance objective measurement of  noise.  They  should  also  be  trained  to  explain  the  results  of  these  measurements to neighbors and renters in the event of a complaint.   Where possible, real‐life examples should be used to illustrate the terms used.  This document should be provided to renters as well.   The City should implement tutorial workshops that clarify what the noise and  behavior rules are. These workshops should open to all community members  and conducted on a regular basis (perhaps once every calendar quarter).   Quiet hours shall be between the hours of 10:00 pm and 8am. No amplified  noise shall be permitted between the hours of 8pm to 8am.   180 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 7 of 24      Issue:    Occupancy Limit violations    Discussion:  The City places occupancy limits on all occupied dwellings, however enforcement  is difficult in most cases because of privacy issues. In the case of STVR properties,  the most visible issue results from parties or renters allowing additional occupants  overnight on the property.     This problem is also difficult to manage from an STVR owner’s p erspective as often  the renter declares substantially fewer occupants on the lease than actually show  up.     Enforcement is difficult when there are no other issues with the rental property,  however when a complaint is issued, the City is empowered to ask (and verify)  how many occupants are on property. (need to check legality of this).     This problem is seldom an isolated issue: it usually arises as part of a complaint  involving  noise,  vandalism,  trespassing  (i.e.  people  in  pools) or  some  other  behavior.     From an STVR rental issue, this problem may not need to be addressed unless it is  the  cause  of  some  other  complaint.  However,  if  such  a  complaint  is  filed  (particularly in evening or nighttime hours), the City has a responsibility  to  respond.      Recommendation:   Empower and require enforcement personnel to ask and verify (subject to  legal applicability) the number of occupants at time of a complaint.    Notify the STVR owner or property manager immediately if a citation will be  issued. This is will enable recovery of any fines from the occupants before  security deposits are refunded, etc.    Limit overnight parking for STVR properties (see also below). (This is the way  some HOA communities manage occupancy issues)    Issue:    Parking    Discussion:  Excessive vehicle parking in and around the property is disruptive to neighbors  and represents safety issues on smaller, narrower streets. Often, mailboxes and  fire hydrants are obstructed in violation of city codes.       Recommendation :  181 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 8 of 24     Require the Owner/Contact person/Property Manager obtain a list of vehicle  license plate numbers for renters occupying the property. This list must be  available to the compliance officer upon demand. Failure to provide this list  will result in a citation.    Limit the number of vehicles that may be parked on the street to a maximum  of three vehicles during times the property is rented.    Issue:    Trash    Discussion:  Trash is sometimes left out on the street when renters exit the property, creating  an objectionable look and possibly a health hazard. Also, trash policies can vary  depending on location within the city. For example, certain HOA communities may  have different trash regulations from other non HOA communities.     Recommendation:   Current regulations are adequate for dealing with this issue, however during  the process of getting a license, the STVR applicant should be specifically  made aware of the current trash collection policy, including the availability of  larger capacity bins and concierge collection services, as well as the fines  associated with non‐compliance.    The STVR owner must inform the renter in writing of the property specific  trash policy as part of the rental agreement.      After the enforcement event    Issue:    Repeat offenders /3 Strikes    Discussion:  There is evidence that while some STVR properties are repeat offenders, a vast  majority of properties are not unduly disruptive from an enforcement perspective.  This means that many of the enforcement issues discussed here result from a  relatively small proportion of STVR properties.     (Note: The issue of STVR Density, the effects on quality of life and community  perspectives etc. are outside the scope of this Enforcement Subcommittee and  will be addressed by the main group).     Therefore, there should be a heavy focus on enforcement of repeat offenders, as  they contribute disproportionately to how the overall program is perceived.     The City already has measures in place that deal with “threepeat” offenders.  Anecdotal evidence suggests these measures are not being used. One reason may  be because the City does not have adequate dedicated resources to manage the  182 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 9 of 24    enforcement  program,  allowing  repeat  offenders  to  get  away  with  multiple  offenses. It also disrupts the neighborhood, provides negative press and denies  the City access to substantial revenues from the program (see above).    Recommendation:   Reduce the current 3‐strike rule to a 2‐strike rule for noise and personal  conduct violations.    In the event an STVR permit is suspended for any cause, the City shall notify  the Owner, and any contact person or Property Management firm associated  with the property. In addition, a notification of suspension shall be sent to all  neighbors adjacent to (on all sides) and across the street from of the  suspended property.    Staff the hotline with a live, (local) person who is familiar with La Quinta  geography and empowered and equipped to initiate complaint resolution  immediately. (See previously).   Increase field enforcement staffing by at least two full time STVR trained  officers available for immediate dispatch during times of need. (See  previously).                                        183 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 10 of 24    City of La Quinta STVR Committee  Recommendations on Violations      This  report  contains  specific recommendations  on  violations  unanimously  approved  by  the  Enforcement subcommittee.     In generating these recommendations, the subcommittee has considered the relative impact of  violations including ‐ but not limited to ‐ three primary areas:     Impact on the ability of the City to effectively regulate and manage STVR Properties   Impact of a compliance violation on neighboring properties   Aligning the interests of an STVR homeowner with the interests of the neighborhood.     The subcommittee believes the magnitude of fines assessed should be strong enough to act as a  behavioral modifier with respect to future conduct, with the three most serious offenses being:     Operating without a permit (bypassing the regulatory process altogether)   Noise and personal conduct violations (neighborhood and quality of life disruption)   Serial offenses (repeated violations)    Research indicates the vast majority of STVR properties comply with  existing  regulations,  however the relative few that do not tend to result in highly visible and disruptive behaviors that  impact neighborhood quality of life and require significant City resources to manage.  It is  therefore prudent to ensure the fine structure is sufficient to discourage future activity.     These recommendations are consistent with adjacent Coachella Valley Cities STVR fine structures.    1. General STVR Violations (Noise / Parking) –     First Violation: $1,000     Second Violation: $2,000 + Suspension of STVR permit for a period of not less  than 30 days and not more than 1 year    2. Operating a STVR without a valid short‐term vacation rental permit –      First Violation: $4,000 + Suspension on applying for a STVR per mit for a period  of not less than 30 days (with every additional day being an offense)     Second Violation: $6,000 + Suspension on applying for a STVR permit for a  period of not less than 1 year (with every additional day being an offense)  184 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 11 of 24      3. Failure to respond within the defined timeframe in person or by phone –      First Violation: $2,000     Second Violation: $2,000 + Suspension of STVR permit for a period of not less  than 30 days    4. Exceeding Occupancy Limits without a permit –      First Violation: $2,500     Second Violation: $5,000 + Suspension of STVR permit for a period of not less  than 30 days    5. The City will notify all adjacent properties as indicated in the illustration below in the  event an STVR permit is revoked for any reason or any length of time.                               185 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 12 of 24    City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee  Recommendations on Permitting      The  subcommittee  on  STVR  Licensing  has  been  formed  to  frame  issues  and  make  recommendations relating to licensing of STVR properties in the City.     Discussion    The City of La Quinta currently has a single class of license for all types of STVR properties.  Criteria for obtaining a permit is the same irrespective of the type, size, rental capacity or  management arrangements for a property. The Committee believes the hosting community can  be better served by accommodating two types of licensing, based on how the property is  managed.      Homeshares:  Homeshare properties are rentals where the property owner hosts visitors in the  owner’s home, while the owner lives on‐site and is in the home throughout the visitor’s  stay.      Homeshare hosts are resident on the property and tend to rent out a room or two  rather than the entire residence. Because they are full time residents, they are viewed  as neighbors by adjacent property owners:      Because they are resident, they are immediately contactable at all hours and  therefore they promote a neighborhood “look and feel”.   They can directly observe and effectively manage all rental activities.   Rental rules and any other renter behavioral requirements are explained in  person (i.e. there is personal and direct information transfer).    Compliance is monitored continually (by the resident homeowner), so any conduct or  other behavioral issues can be managed in real time. Because of this, issues are  addressed before they become problematic from a neighbor or community perspective.    STVR’s: STVR properties are properties where the Owner is not living on‐site and in the home  throughout the visitor’s stay.      STVR hosts are not resident on the property for the entire duration of the renters stay  and are managed by non‐resident property owners or property management firms who  may be available locally or out of the area. These properties may be viewed by  residents/neighbors (and possibly renters) as commercial enterprises.    186 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 13 of 24     Property oversight is by the remote homeowner or engagement of a property  management firm.   Because there is limited interpersonal contact, compliance is not monitored in  real time, and notification to the homeowner or property manager is only made  after disruption has occurred and a complaint has been made.   These properties require a disproportionate amount of City resources for  compliance enforcement. (Copy of STVR Administrative Citations January 2019  to July 2020 08282020[1].xlsx).    Recommendations    The Committee believes it appropriate to make the following recommendations:    1. Short Term Rental permits shall be separated into two types of permit categories:  Homeshares and STVR Properties ‐ as defined above.    2. Minimum Stay requirements:    a. In the case of Homeshares, the Subcommittee does not recommend  implementation of a minimum stay requirement.   b. In the case of STVR’s, the Subcommittee recommends a two‐night minimum stay  requirement.     3. Neighbor notification of a new permit or permit renewal:    a. As part of the permitting process, the applicant shall notify (at their expense)  adjacent property owners of their receiving a permit to operate. For the  purposes of notification, the term adjacent property will include all properties  surrounding the licensed property as shown in Figure 1 below.  b. If the subject property is in a HOA community, the applicant shall also notify (at  their expense) the Homeowner Association.  c. The permittee shall provide complete documentation regarding rules and  regulations pertaining to the rental to the adjacent properties described in 3(a)  and 3(b) above. This shall include complete copies of any City recommended  documents, contact information for the owner and any designated  representative(s), as well as contact details for the City complaint hotline.   d. The permittee shall provide to the City proof of service and HOA notification (if  applicable) to adjacent property owners as described above, in the form of  registered mail receipts or an affidavit certifying service.    4. Property Inspection:  a. Virtual inspection: The City shall prepare, and supply to the applicant, a list of  requirements that are necessary for property evaluation. The applicant shall  187 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 14 of 24    provide photographic and any other supporting evidence that these  requirements have been met.   b. Physical Inspection: The licensee shall make the property available for a physical  inspection upon notification from the City. City inspection shall be at the sole  discretion of the City and any fees will be paid for by the applicant homeowner    5. Costs of Program Administration.    a. All costs associated with administering the program should be fully covered by  the permit/licensing fees.   b. Homeshare permit fees should therefore be less than STVR permit fees.    6. Permits shall not be transferrable.     7. The City shall prepare an integrated, comprehensive relational database of permittees  and applicants. This data framework shall allow for on demand statistical analysis of all  aspects of the STVR program, including but not limited to: contact information for the  owner and designated emergency contact or property management firm, types of  permit, density in relation of adjacent properties, history with details on complaints  and/or citations, and any other fields necessary for the effective enforcement and  reporting on the STVR program.    8. The address of properties having suspended permits shall be published on the City STVR  website, together with the duration of the suspension.    9. In the event a property owner is cited for operating without a permit, a period of not  less than 6 months shall pass before the owner can apply for a permit. In the event a  property owner is cited a second time for operating without a permit, that owner shall  not be eligible for a permit at all.    The Subcommittee debated reinstatement options for suspended permits. That is, should the  permit be automatically reinstated at the end of a suspension period or should the owner be  required to reapply for a new permit. The subcommittee did not reach a consensus on this  issue. The subcommittee felt the issue should be considered in the context of Density  Subcommittee recommendations and the level of desire to achieve a more rapid achievement  of the density recommendations.     188 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 15 of 24      Figure 1:   Adjacent properties requiring notification of a permit being granted:                                                              189 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 16 of 24    City of La Quinta STVR Committee  Recommendations on Occupancy Density        The  subcommittee  on  STVR  Density has been formed to frame issues  and  make  recommendations relating to occupant and property density concentrations of rental properties  in the City.     There are two questions regarding Density:     Occupancy Density: The number of occupants that are permitted to occupy a given rental  property.      Property Density: The number of STVR properties as a percentage of total properties in a  geographic area    This recommendation is part 1 of 2 and addresses only the issue of Occupancy density. The  Subcommittee continues to work on part 2 of 2 – recommendations on Property density.     The subcommittee is recommending Ad‐Hoc Committee adoption of the following:    Part 1. Occupancy Density    Discussion  Occupancy caps can be used to manage renter behavior and help preserve neighborhood  residential characteristics. The City has daytime and overnight residential limitations on STVR  properties; however, issues continue to arise from certain properties where heavily populated  gatherings result in neighborhood disruptions from excessive noise or other personal conduct  issues (“party houses”).     Noise and personal behavior violations resulting from high occupancy events are very visible  within the community as they tend to disturb neighbors within a wide radius of the subject  property for extended periods. The high visibility and resulting severe adverse community  reaction towards these properties often masks the majority of peaceful neighborhood STVR  businesses.    Citation statistics confirm the noise issue is worse for properties that have absentee owners or  managers. This is because an onsite owner/manager is able to directly and expeditiously  supervise the property in real time by limiting the occupancy or other renter behavior (and  therefore noise generated) of a property.     190 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 17 of 24    Properties where there is no onsite supervision have a more difficult time managing the  numbers of people on property as they are in most cases only alerted to the issue after it  becomes problematic.     For reference, the current ordinance allows the following occupancy:    Number of Bedrooms  Total Overnight Occupants*  Total Daytime Occupants  (Including Number of  Overnight Occupants)**  0 ‐ Studio 2 2 ‐ 8  1 2 ‐ 4 2 – 8  2 4 – 6 4 – 8  3 6 – 8 6 – 12  4 8 – 10 8 – 16  5 10 – 12 10 – 18  6 12 – 14 12 – 20  7 14 14 – 20  8 16 16 – 22  9 18 18 – 24      The Committee recommends the following occupancy levels:    Number of Bedrooms  Total Overnight Occupants*  Total Daytime Occupants  (Including Number of  Overnight Occupants)**  Studio 3 (1 must be child under 12) 6  1 4 (2 must be children under  12)  6  2 4 8  3 6 10  4 8 12  5 10 14  6 12 16  7 14 18  8 or more 16 18  * Overnight (10:01 p.m. – 6:59 a.m.)  ** Daytime (7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.)      Note: Occupancy levels exceeding these numbers will require a Special Events Permit.    There are several factors for recommending these changes to occupancy limits:  191 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 18 of 24       Accommodation has been made for a single family with children under 12 in Studio and  one bedroom rentals   Occupancy ranges are not necessary because the concept of a limit implies only the  highest number is relevant.    Occupancy ranges may be confusing from an enforcement and STVR renter perspective.   The recommended occupancy levels are consistent with other desert communities.   Reasonable and fair accommodations are made with respect to the number of  additional daytime visitors, while also respecting a neighbors’ right to quiet enjoyment,  privacy and safety.                                                                     192 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 19 of 24    City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee  Recommendations on Property Density      The  subcommittee  on  STVR  Density has been formed to frame issues  and  make  recommendations relating to occupant and property density concentrations of rental properties  in the City.     There are two questions regarding Density:     Occupancy Density: The number of occupants that are permitted to occupy a given rental  property.      Property Density: The number of STVR properties as a percentage of total properties in a  geographic area    This recommendation is part 2 of 2 and addresses only the issue of property density. The  Subcommittee has previously submitted recommendations for Part 1: Occupancy Density.     The subcommittee is recommending Ad‐Hoc Committee adoption of the following:      Part 2. Property Density    Discussion    Residential neighborhoods are social communities because the people that live in them  commonly talk and interact with each other. A neighborhood is commonly defined as “the  spatial units in which face‐to‐face social interactions occur—the personal settings and  situations where relationships develop, and residents seek to realize common values, socialize  youth, and maintain effective social control.” For this reason, neighborhoods are often zoned to  exclude commercial businesses or industrial development.     In 2012, La Quinta passed an ordinance to allow appropriately permitted homes to operate as  business entities in residential zones (STVR Ordinance 3.25). While ordinance has been  amended as the STVR business has evolved, the rapid increase of commercial enterprise has  had an impact on the residential nature of the neighborhood.     If it is desired to maintain a sense of community (i.e. neighborhood “look and feel”), there  should be a balance between STVR properties and residential properties such that enough  residential properties are preserved to maintain that sense of community.    193 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 20 of 24    STVR’s by nature comprise transient occupants who are not resident in the community long  enough to establish relationships capable of building community. High concentrations of STVR’s  with significant transient occupancy rates result in areas becoming commercial zones rather  than residential neighborhoods. An additional concern is the ‘clustering’ of STRs in some areas  which overburden some neighborhoods.    Preservation of a neighborhood (and sense of community) will therefore depend on effectively  managing the balance between STVR density/clustering and residential properties.    Significant research by the subcommittee (including review of STR codes, densities, allowances,  restrictions in the Coachella Valley, as well as other like cities) has revealed the short‐term  rental community can be subdivided into two constituent groups ‐ Homeshares and STVR’s:    Homeshares:  Homeshare properties are rentals where the property owner hosts visitors in the  owner’s home, while the Owner lives on‐site and in the home throughout the visitor’s  stay.      Homeshare owners are resident on the property and tend to rent out a room or two  rather than the entire residence. Because they are resident, they are viewed as  neighbors by adjacent property owners:      They are immediately contactable at all hours and therefore they do not detract  from the neighborhood “look and feel”.   They can directly observe and effectively manage all rental activities in real time.   Rental rules and any other renter behavioral requirements are explained in  person (direct information transfer).   Compliance is monitored continually, so any conduct or other behavioral issues  can be managed in real time.    STVR’s:  STVR properties are properties where the Owner is not living on‐site and in the home  throughout the visitor’s stay.      STVR owners are not resident on the property and may be managed by absentee  property owners or property management firms. These properties may be viewed by  residents/neighbors (and possibly renters) as commercial enterprises.     Property oversight is by the remote homeowner or engagement of a property  management firm.   While renters do sign contracts, because there may be limited interpersonal  contact, they may not be adequately vetted immediately prior to occupancy.  194 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 21 of 24     Compliance is not monitored in real time, and notification to the homeowner or  property manager is only made after disruption has occurred and a complaint  has been made (~75% of citations are to non‐resident owners). The desired goal  is to prevent the complaint altogether.    Because of these critical differences, the Committee believes it appropriate to make the  following recommendations:    10. For the purposes of property density recommendations, Short Term Rental properties  shall be separated into two categories: Homeshares and STVR Properties ‐ as defined  above.    11. In the case of Homeshares, the Subcommittee does not recommend implementation of  density limitations at this time.     12. In the case of STVR’s, the Subcommittee recommends that STVR permits be limited to:    a. For single family residences, one STVR property per 300 feet radius of a  previously permitted property.  b. For condominium complexes consisting of four or more units, two STVR  properties per 300 feet radius.    13. Tourist Commercial Zones should be exempt from density limitations.    14. The subcommittee was able to achieve consensus on how these density  recommendations should be implemented:     a. Approve pending and new applications that comply with the density  requirement above  b. Properties that have their permits suspended shall be required to reapply for a  permit and be subjected to the density recommendations  c. Phasing in density limits to existing STVR’s that do not comply with the density  requirement with renewals effective in 2022      An example of the recommended property radius is shown below (La Quinta Cove). Note radius  is measured from the property boundaries.              195 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 22 of 24          Figure 1 Illustrative example of La Quinta Cove with proposed 300 foot density recommendation                                196 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 23 of 24    STVR Ad Hoc Committee  Marketing Sub‐Committee’s Top 5 Priorities to Accomplish      Issue:    Recognizing that the quiet enjoyment of neighbors is of the hig hest priority for the success of the  La Quinta STVR program, the marketing sub‐committee is recommending an immediate focus on  5 key areas that could be implemented quickly to improve Host and Guest compliance, education  for the overall benefit, as well as gaining confidence of the neighbors of STVRs.    Immediate Recommendations:    1. Host Checklist:   This checklist would be pushed to Hosts via the MuniRevs email list and possibly also  posted  in  MuniRevs  as  a  task  to  be  completed  and  tracked.  The  priority  would  be  distribution to owners and managers of known problem properties. The goal of the  checklist is to educate Hosts on best practices they should implement immediately to  ensure guests are informed and neighbors' interests are being considered.  Checklist  items include items required by city code, but also recommendations for specific items  that engage a responsible Host to manage expectations before problems arrive.    2. Good Neighbor/Good Guest Brochure: The Good Neighbor Brochure has been updated  by the City marketing staff and the sub‐committee has offered suggestions to make it  even more useful for Hosts. One suggestion is to rename it the Good Guest brochure,  making it a one‐sided sheet for easy posting and durability in a vacation rental. The Sub‐ Committee has suggested a second, Neighbor specific brochure be considered to educate  neighbors about when and how to open complaints, for example "Call about This, Not  That". The Neighbor specific brochure would be distributed to all homes in the vicinity of  a vacation rental as part of the neighbor notification requirement recommended by the  Permitting sub‐committee.    3. Host Training & Best Practices: The sub‐committee has outlined a draft guest on‐ boarding  process  for  the  purpose  of  creating  a  Host  Training  Certification  with  live  workshops and/or video training and a Host testing platform. The goal of the training is  to  improve  hosting  capabilities  and  guest  management  for  reduced  complaints  and  compliance  thus  less  violations.  This  tactic  supports  recommendations  from  the  Permitting sub‐committee that Hosts complete training for permit renewal.    4. Violation Notice/Supplement: Guests are often uninformed by Hosts and/or lacking  intel about the noise orders and expectations when renting a vacation rental. The sub‐ committee discussed the possibility of creating a Violation Brochure/Letter issued to  Guests when Code Enforcement or the Sheriff visits the home in response to a complaint.  Currently,  Citations  are  issued  to  Owners  and  not  Guests.  The  intent  of  this  197 City of La Quinta STVR Ad Hoc Committee   Final Recommendations – December 15, 2020    Page 24 of 24    strongly worded 1 page document would be to inform the Guest that a citation with fines  may have been issued for which they may be financially responsible as well and that any  additional complaints may result in their immediate evacuation from the property and  the Host's license being suspended.     5. Welcome Guest Video: Creation of a video to be posted on the City website and  YouTube with a link that can be easily shared by Hosts to their guests as part of their pre‐ arrival on‐boarding process. Content of a short, approximately 3‐4‐minute video would  serve to welcome guests to La Quinta while notifying them that we are a “Neighbors First  Community” and outlining expectations about noise, parking, trash, and occupancy. The  video could also be shared via social media channels as part of a greater STVR marketing  strategy.  As time is of the essence, a simple but professional card deck style recording  with  interspersed  stock  video  and  professional  voice‐over  could  be  created  cost‐ effectively for immediate roll‐out with a longer range goal of replacing it with an improved  video with high quality production once a larger budget is established. A QR code to view  the video could be included in the Good Guest brochure.      198 STVR Ad Hoc Committee Enforcement Recommendations DECEMBER 15, 2020 blue – staff has already implemented, recommends implementing, or implementation is underway; green – recommendation has been incorporated in the recent Code update; yellow – for further discussion and consideration; white – staff does not recommend. 2020 ATTACHMENT 2199 ENFORCEMENT Part 1 - Issues before an enforcement event – Communicating with the City / Verifying a complaint Issue 2: STVR Homeowner not registering with the City 2 Committee Recommendation 2.a Require that a City of La Quinta STVR permit number be included in all property advertisements on all platforms (VRBO, print, web, etc.). 2.b Publicize the registration requirements regularly on the web site and through social media outlets. 2.c Where possible, partner with HOA communities and Management Companies to exchange information on STVR rental activities. 2.d Include mail inserts to all residents in any surface mailings sent out to residents. 2.e Assess significant monetary penalties for non-compliance. These penalties must be paid before an STVR license can be obtained. 1 Committee Recommendation 1.a Staff the hotline with live, (local, trained) personnel who are familiar with La Quinta geography and empowered and equipped to initiate complaint resolution immediately. 1.b Increase field enforcement staffing by at least two additional full time STVR trained officers available for immediate dispatch during times of need. 1.c Hotline and enforcement staff should be dynamically managed: more staff when the hotline is heavily used (evenings and weekends) and less staffing at times when complaints tend to be low (weekday mornings and afternoons). 1.d Require a code inspection on a property prior to granting an STVR license. This inspection should be for the purposes of verifying accuracy with respect to the application, particularly in the areas of occupancy limits (number of bedrooms) and living arrangements (room conversions, etc.). 200 ENFORCEMENT Issue 3: STVR Owner not aware of the rules 3 Recommendation 3.a Applicants, any individuals listed as contacts for the property, and any designated Management Company representatives who directly manage a property must attend a compulsory workshop prior to the issuance of permits. Applicants must sign a document asserting they have attended the workshop, understand the rules and agree to be bound by them. 3.b STVR Owners, any individuals listed as contacts for the property, and any designated Management Company representatives who are directly responsible for managing a property that has been assessed a violation must retake the compulsory workshop at their own expense before a license for that property can be renewed. 3.c This training workshop should also be open to the public so that interested parties (neighbors, potential new STVR licensees) can familiarize themselves with the requirements and responsibilities of STVR ownership. 3.d False advertising (i.e. number of bedrooms, sleeping capacity, occupancy limits) will result in a citation, and count as a strike against the property. Issue 4: Renters not aware of the rules 4 Recommendation 4.a The City require the property owner/manager assert that a renter has been provided with all current City ordinances governing expected behavior in advance of allowing that renter to occupy the property. 4.b A condensed copy of the relevant ordinance(s) must be permanently fixed to a prominent location inside the property. This document will be generated by the City and outline the relevant rules in plain language. (duplicate of 4.a) 4.c Update and strengthen the “Good Neighbor” brochure to include specific language relating to noise and personal behavior requirements. Require a copy be included as part of every rental agreement. 4.d Changes to City ordinances, including adoption of temporary orders must be posted in a prominent location inside the property within 48 hours of adoption, and before the property can be rented again. (duplicate of 4.a) 201 ENFORCEMENT Issue 5: Neighbors not aware of the rules 5 Recommendation 5.a ALL neighbors adjacent to (on all sides) and across the street from an STVR property be notified by the city and supplied with the same documents the Owner is required to furnish to the renter. (This could be a requirement placed on the STVR owner if the City feels it is appropriate – as long as the neighbor gets the information). These documents must include: A copy of the City STVR Ordinance A copy of the “Good Neighbor” brochure Contact information for complaints to the City. Contact information for the Property owner and the Property Manager if applicable. A link to the City STVR website where interim rule changes are posted. 5.b These documents should be refreshed annually as part of the license renewal process. 5.c A document should be provided to the neighbor explaining the meaning of any technical terms. Where possible real-life examples should be used to illustrate the terms used. This document should be provided to renters as well. 202 ENFORCEMENT The Enforcement Event Issue 6: No contact with Owner/Representative 6 Recommendation 6.a Implement an escalation process whereby if the first call to the designated contact goes unanswered within a 30-minute window, a call is made to RSO and a mandatory citation is issued. 6.b As described above, increase the number of trained and dedicated enforcement personnel to levels that can actively address the situation with or without the homeowner / property manager. Issue 7: Noise/Behavior/Party Events 7 Recommendations 7.a A document should be prepared and provided to all parties clarifying definitively the meaning of any technical measurements and how these measurements should be interpreted. (See also above). 7.b Enforcement personnel should be provided with and trained to use relevant noise level meters and other tools that enhance objective measurement of noise. They should also be trained to explain the results of these measurements to neighbors and renters in the event of a complaint. 7.c Where possible, real-life examples should be used to illustrate the terms used. This document should be provided to renters as well. 7.d The City should implement tutorial workshops that clarify what the noise and behavior rules are. These workshops should be open to all community members and conducted on a regular basis (perhaps once every calendar quarter). 7.e Quiet hours shall be between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8 a.m. No amplified noise shall be permitted between the hours of 8 p.m. to 8 a.m. 203 Issue 8: Occupancy Limit Violations 8 Recommendations 8.a Empower and require enforcement personnel to ask and verify (subject to legal applicability) the number of occupants at time of a complaint. 8.b Notify the STVR owner or property manager immediately if a citation will be issued. This will enable recovery of any fines from the occupants before security deposits are refunded, etc. 8.c Limit overnight parking for STVR properties (see also below). (This is the way some HOA communities manage occupancy issues) ENFORCEMENT Issue 9: Parking 9 Recommendations 9.a Require the Owner/Contact person/Property Manager obtain a list of vehicle license plate numbers for renters occupying the property. This list must be available to the compliance officer upon demand. Failure to provide this list will result in a citation. 9.b Limit the number of vehicles that may be parked on the street to a maximum of three vehicles during times the property is rented. Issue 10: Trash 10 Recommendations 10.a Current regulations are adequate for dealing with this issue, however during the process of getting a license, the STVR applicant should be specifically made aware of the current trash collection policy, including the availability of larger capacity bins and concierge collection services, as well as the fines associated with non-compliance. 10.b The STVR owner must inform the renter in writing of the property specific trash policy as part of the rental agreement. 204 ENFORCEMENT Part 3 - After the Enforcement Event Issue 11: Repeat offenders/3 strikes 11 Recommendations 11.a Reduce the current 3-strike rule to a 2-strike rule for noise and personal conduct violations. 11.b In the event an STVR permit is suspended for any cause, the City shall notify the Owner, and any contact person or Property Management firm associated with the property. In addition, a notification of suspension shall be sent to all neighbors adjacent to (on all sides) and across the street from of the suspended property. 11.c Staff the hotline with a live, (local) person who is familiar with La Quinta geography and empowered and equipped to initiate complaint resolution immediately. (See previously). 11.d Increase field enforcement staffing by at least two full time STVR trained officers available for immediate dispatch during times of need. (See previously). 205 STVR Ad Hoc Committee Violations Recommendations DECEMBER 15, 2020 blue – staff has already implemented, recommends implementing, or implementation is underway; green – recommendation has been incorporated in the recent Code update; yellow – for further discussion and consideration; white – staff does not recommend. 2020 206 VIOLATIONS Part II - Recommendations on Violations Issue: Communicating with the City / Verifying a complaint Committee Recommendation Code Update 12 General STVR Violations (Noise/ Parking) a. First Violation: $1,000 b. Second Violation: $2,000 + Suspension of STVR permit for a period of not less than 30 days and not more than 1 year General STVR Violations (Occupancy/Noise/Parking). a. First violation: $1,000; b. Second violation: $2,000; c.Third violation: $3,000 13 Operating a STVR without a valid short-term vacation rental permit a. First Violation: $4,000 + Suspension on applying for a STVR permit for a period of not less than 30 days (with every additional day being an offense) b. Second Violation: $6,000 + Suspension on applying for a STVR permit for a period of not less than 1 year (with every additional day being an offense) Operating a STVR Without a Valid Short-Term Vacation Rental Permit. a. First violation: $3,000; b. Second or more violations: $5,000; In addition to the fine set forth above, the first violation of operating a STVR without a valid short-term vacation rental permit shall be cause for an owner (or person and/or entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner a property) to be prohibited for all time from being eligible to be issued a short-term vacation rental permit and/or business license for use of a property as a short-term vacation rental unit. 207 Committee Recommendation Code Update 14 Failure to respond within the defined timeframe in person or by phone – a. First Violation: $2,000 b. Second Violation: $2,000 + Suspension of STVR permit for a period of not less than 30 days Failure to respond within the defined timeframe in person or by phone – a. First violation: $1,000; b. Second violation: $2,000; c. Third violation: $3,000. 15 Exceeding Occupancy Limits without a permit – a. First Violation: $2,500 b. Second Violation: $5,000 + Suspension of STVR permit for a period of not less than 30 days Exceeding Occupancy Limits without a permit - a. First violation: $1,000; b. Second violation: $2,000; c. Third violation: $3,000 16 The City will notify all adjacent properties as indicated in the illustration below in the event an STVR permit is revoked for any reason or any length of time. 17 Quiet hours shall be between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8 a.m. No amplified noise shall be permitted between the hours of 8 p.m. to 8 a.m. 208 STVR Ad Hoc Committee Permitting Recommendations DECEMBER 15, 2020 blue – staff has already implemented, recommends implementing, or implementation is underway; green – recommendation has been incorporated in the recent Code update; yellow – for further discussion and consideration; white – staff does not recommend. 2020 209 PERMITTING Recommendations 18 Short Term Rental permits shall be separated into two types of permit categories: Homeshares and STVR Properties:  Homeshare Permit: Rentals where the property owner hosts visitors in the owner’s home, while the owner lives on-site and is in the home throughout the visitor’s stay.  STVR Permit: Owner is not living on-site and in the home throughout the visitor’s stay. 19 Homeshare permit fees should be less than STVR permit fees. 20 STVR Property Permits requires a two-night minimum stay. 21 Neighbor Notification of a new permit or permit renewal: a. Permittee shall notify (at their expense) adjacent property owners of their receiving a permit to operate. For the purposes of notification, the term “adjacent property” will include all properties surrounding the licensed property as shown in Figure 1 of Permitting Subcommittee Recommendations document. b. If the subject property is in a HOA community, the Permittee shall also notify (at their expense) the Homeowner Association. c. The Permittee shall provide complete documentation regarding rules and regulations pertaining to the rental to the adjacent properties described in (a) and (b) above. This shall include complete copies of any City recommended documents, contact information for the owner and any designated representative(s), as well as contact details for the City complaint hotline. d. The permittee shall provide to the City proof of service and HOA notification (if applicable) to adjacent property owners as described above, in the form of registered mail receipts or an affidavit certifying service. Figure 1. Adjacent properties requiring notification of a permit being granted:  210 22 Property Inspection:  Virtual inspection: The City shall prepare, and supply to the applicant, a list of requirements that are necessary for property evaluation. The applicant shall provide photographic and any other supporting evidence that these requirements have been met.  Physical Inspection: The licensee shall make the property available for a physical inspection upon notification from the City. City inspection shall be at the sole discretion of the City and any fees will be paid for by the applicant homeowner 23 All costs associated with administering the program should be fully covered by the permit/licensing fees. 24 Permits shall not be transferable. 25 The City shall prepare an integrated, comprehensive relational database of permittees and applicants. This data framework shall allow for on demand statistical analysis of all aspects of the STVR program, including but not limited to: contact information for the owner and designated emergency contact or property management firm, types of permit, density in relation of adjacent properties, history with details on complaints and/or citations, and any other fields necessary for the effective enforcement and reporting on the STVR program. 26 The address of properties having suspended permits shall be published on the City STVR website, together with the duration of the suspension.  27 In the event a property owner is cited for operating without a permit, a period of not less than 6 months shall pass before the owner can apply for a permit. In the event a property owner is cited a second time for operating without a permit, that owner shall not be eligible for a permit at all. 211 STVR Ad Hoc Committee Occupancy and Property Density Recommendations DECEMBER 15, 2020 blue – staff has already implemented, recommends implementing, or implementation is underway; green – recommendation has been incorporated in the recent Code update; yellow – for further discussion and consideration; white – staff does not recommend. 2020 212 OCCUPANCY DENSITY Recommendations 28 Current Ordinance – limits the number of occupants that are permitted to occupy rental property. Number of Bedrooms Total Overnight Occupants* Total Daytime Occupants (Including Number of Overnight Occupants)** 0 – Studio 2 2 - 8 1 2 - 4 2 – 8 2 4 – 6 4 – 8 3 6 – 8 6 – 12 4 8 – 10 8 – 16 5 10 – 12 10 – 18 6 12 – 14 12 – 20 7 14 14 – 20 8 16 16 – 22 9 18 18 – 24 Recommendation Number of Bedrooms Total Overnight Occupants* Total Daytime Occupants (Including Number of Overnight Occupants)** Studio 3 (1 must be child under 12) 6 1 4 (2 must be children under 12) 6 2 4 8 3 6 10 4 8 12 5 10 14 6 12 16 7 14 18 8 or more 16 18 *Overnight (10:01 p.m. – 6:59 a.m.) ** Daytime (7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.) Note: Occupancy levels exceeding these numbers shall require a Special Events Permit. 213 PROPERTY DENSITY Recommendations 29 STVR Permits (properties where the Owner is not living on-site and in the home throughout the visitor’s stay; owners are not resident on the property and may be managed by absentee property owners or property management firms): e. For single family residences, one STVR property per 300 feet radius of a previously permitted property (See Figure 1, attached). f. For condominium complexes consisting of four or more units, two STVR properties per 300 feet radius (see Figure 2, attached). 30 Homeshare Permits (rentals where the property owner hosts visitors in the owner’s home, while the Owner lives on-site and in the home throughout the visitor’s stay), density limitations do not apply. 31 Tourist Commercial Zones should be exempt from density limitations. 32 Implementation of density limitations: a. Approve pending and new applications that comply with the density requirement above b. Properties that have their permits suspended shall be required to reapply for a permit and be subjected to the density recommendations c. Phasing in density limits to existing STVR’s that do not comply with the density requirement with renewals effective in 2022 214 Figure 1. Illustrative example of La Quinta Cove with proposed 300 foot density recommendation. 215 Figure 2. Illustrative example of condominium complex (PGA West) with proposed limit of two STVR properties within 300 foot radius. 216 Figure 3. Example of 300 foot radius in the Cove limiting density/concentration of STVR. Five (5) STVRs would be allowed, out of 144 properties within given area. This amounts to 3% STVR properties within the given area. 217 Figure 4. Example of 300 foot radius in North La Quinta limiting density/concentration of STVR. Eight (8) STVRs would be allowed, out of 165 properties within given area. This amounts to 4% STVR properties within the given area. 218 STVR Ad Hoc Committee Top 5 Marketing Priorities DECEMBER 15, 2020 blue – staff has already implemented, recommends implementing, or implementation is underway; green – recommendation has been incorporated in the recent Code update; yellow – for further discussion and consideration; white – staff does not recommend. 2020 219 MARKETING Priorities/Recommendations 33 Host Checklist: This checklist would be pushed to Hosts via the MuniRevs email list and possibly also posted in MuniRevs as a task to be completed and tracked. The priority would be distribution to owners and managers of known problem properties. The goal of the checklist is to educate Hosts on best practices they should implement immediately to ensure guests are informed and neighbors' interests are being considered. Checklist items include items required by city code, but also recommendations for specific items that engage a responsible Host to manage expectations before problems arrive. 34 Good Neighbor/Good Guest Brochure: The Good Neighbor Brochure has been updated by the City marketing staff and the sub-committee has offered suggestions to make it even more useful for Hosts. One suggestion is to rename it the Good Guest brochure, making it a one-sided sheet for easy posting and durability in a vacation rental. The Sub-Committee has suggested a second, Neighbor specific brochure be considered to educate neighbors about when and how to open complaints, for example "Call about This, Not That". The Neighbor specific brochure would be distributed to all homes in the vicinity of a vacation rental as part of the neighbor notification requirement recommended by the Permitting sub-committee. 35 Host Training & Best Practices: The sub-committee has outlined a draft guest on-boarding process for the purpose of creating a Host Training Certification with live workshops and/or video training and a Host testing platform. The goal of the training is to improve hosting capabilities and guest management for reduced complaints and compliance thus less violations. This tactic supports recommendations from the Permitting sub-committee that Hosts complete training for permit renewal. 36 Violation Notice/Supplement: Guests are often uninformed by Hosts and/or lacking intel about the noise orders and expectations when renting a vacation rental. The sub-committee discussed the possibility of creating a Violation Brochure/Letter issued to Guests when Code Enforcement or the Sheriff visits the home in response to a complaint. Currently, Citations are issued to Owners and not Guests. The intent of this strongly worded 1 page document would be to inform the Guest that a citation with fines may have been issued for which they may be financially responsible as well and that any additional complaints may result in their immediate evacuation from the property and the Host's license being suspended. 37 Welcome Guest Video: Creation of a video to be posted on the City website and YouTube with a link that can be easily shared by Hosts to their guests as part of their pre-arrival on-boarding process. Content of a short, approximately 3-4-minute video would serve to welcome guests to La Quinta while notifying them that we are a “Neighbors First Community” and outlining expectations about noise, parking, trash, and occupancy. The video could also be shared via social media channels as part of a greater STVR marketing strategy. As time is of the essence, a simple but professional card deck style recording with interspersed stock video and professional voice-over could be created cost-effectively for immediate roll-out with a longer range goal of replacing it with an improved video with high quality production once a larger budget is established. A QR code to view the video could be included in the Good Guest brochure. 220 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 6, 2020: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0006, AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 AMENDMENT NO. 2, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PROPOSING AN APPROXIMATE 125,000 SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER WITH DRIVE-THROUGHS AND A 63,000 SQUARE-FOOT SUPERMARKET WITH ASSOCIATED VEHICLE FUEL CENTER. CEQA: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 50 AND JEFFERSON STREET. PROJECT: PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER RECOMMENDATION A. Adopt a resolution to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2, “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Environmental Assessment 2017-0006. B. Adopt a resolution to approve Specific Plan 2017-0002, Amendment No. 2 of the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan (SP 1998-034), Tentative Parcel Map 2017- 0003 (TPM 37370), and Site Development Permit 2017-0009, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The applicant is requesting a Specific Plan Amendment (SPA), TPM, Site Development Permit (SDP), and Environmental Assessment (EA) to construct an approximate 125,000 sq. ft. shopping center consisting of commercial/office and retail buildings. •On December 10, 2019, the Planning Commission (Commission) recommended Council approval, following review and consideration of the item and public testimony during four public hearings. •Council considered this item during public hearings held on February 4, March 3, May 5, July 7, and October 6, 2020. At the October 6, 2020 hearing, the applicant presented progress of design revisions that included buildings with increased height of up to 35 feet at the corner of Jefferson and Avenue 50, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 221 which requires a revision to the SPA to add this alternate development standard. •Council recommended the Commission review the proposed alternate development standard (building height increase), and continued the public hearing to December 15, 2020, to allow time for the applicant to further refine the design and allow the Commission to review at their November 24, 2020 meeting. The Commission did not recommend the alternate development standard (3 noes, 2 ayes, 1 absent, 1 recused). FISCAL IMPACT If approved, once operational, the project would generate sales and property taxes. Estimated taxable sales range from $7-9 million per year for the Pavilions store, $5- 8 million per year in gas sales and approximately $16 million per year for retail and restaurant sales for the remainder of the center. This volume of sales would produce $560,000-660,000 per year in new tax revenues for the City. Additionally, the estimated assessed value of the property is $28 million, yielding an estimated $12,000-17,000 per year in property taxes to the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Project History The Rancho Cielo Specific Plan (SP 1998-034) was approved in May 1999, for a 111,000 sq. ft. shopping center on 12.5 acres at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. A General Plan Amendment (GPA), Zone Change (ZC), and TPM (TPM 29052) were also approved. In 2002, SPA No. 1 was approved for a 100,460 sq. ft. shopping center and renamed as the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan. This project was not constructed. Public Hearing History After review and consideration of the item and public testimony during four public hearings, the Commission recommended Council approval of this item on December 10, 2019, with some added conditions of approval to further encourage walkable design and address lighting issues. Council Direction Council held public hearings on February 4, March 3, May 5, July 7, and October 6, 2020 (staff reports and related materials are hereby incorporated by this reference), reviewed the proposal, considered public testimony, and asked the applicant to further revise the design of the site as follows: •Revise the site plan to provide better pedestrian circulation; •Make the gathering spaces a more cohesive part of the plan; •Incorporate improved shade features; •Consider reducing the amount of parking for the center, in favor of more neighborhood design features; •Move the fuel center further to the north along Jefferson Street to create a more iconic corner at Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street; 222 •Explore not having a left out at the eastern driveway on Avenue 50; •Consider what incorporating mixed uses could do for the center; •Show more detail of the corner plaza; •Revise corner building footprints to have better usable indoor space; and •Show renderings of plaza from outside the center. Additionally, at the October hearing, the applicant presented progress of the design revisions and showed exhibits with enhanced plaza area and revised architecture of buildings at the corner of Jefferson and Avenue 50 and requested a continuance to further refine the design. The corner buildings are designed with slanted rooflines, “wings,” that converge upward toward each other, extending to a height of 35 feet. The SPA would need to be revised to incorporate an alternative development standard to the current image corridor height limit in the underlying zone. Per Section 9.90.040 of the Municipal Code, building height along image corridors is limited to 22 feet within 150 feet of the roadway. Council recommended the Commission review the proposed addition to the SPA to incorporate this alternate development standard. The Commission considered this addition on November 24, 2020 and did not recommend that it be incorporated into the SPA, citing that the building is out of scale with the neighborhood, an alley is created between the buildings, and that the buildings are counter to the desired iconic effect. Site Development Permit – Revised Site Plan The applicant has revised the site plan in response to comments from Council. The revised site plan shows the shopping center with 13 buildings at 124,990 sq. ft. This results in 0.23 Floor Area Ratio (FAR), still below the allowed 0.30 FAR for the underlying Community Commercial (CC) zone. Other changes made include: •The plaza area at the Jefferson Street/Avenue 50 corner has been refined and renderings have been included to show more detail in the plaza area and show the image from outside the center. •Pedestrian connectivity has been enhanced with pronounced stamped concrete walkways and same treatment at the driveway entrances to the site. •The fuel center has been moved further north along Jefferson Street. •Architectural treatments have been enhanced to more closely reflect the look of the Pavilions building. •Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 would be slated for future construction, requiring a subsequent SDP. •The site has been designed with 532 parking stalls, which is less than the maximum limit of 582 stalls and more than the minimum requirement of 469 stalls. The 13 commercial buildings consist of the following (Attachment 2): •A 63,000 sq. ft. Pavilions grocery store building, with a drive-through pharmacy; •A Pavilions-branded fuel center, with an 825 sq. ft. mini-mart (Building 7); •A retail building approximately 4,400 sq. ft. (Retail 1); •A multi-tenant building (Shops 1) approximately 11,700 sq. ft.; •Five buildings ranging from 2,000 to 5,151 sq. ft. (Buildings 1-5) along the Jefferson Street frontage, with Buildings 3 and 4 as drive-throughs; and 223 •Four buildings ranging from 3,500 to 8,214 sq. ft. along the Avenue 50 frontage. Fuel Center Location and Operations There are no new changes to the fuel center’s location and operations. The fuel center location is on the east side towards the middle of the site along Jefferson Street instead of along Avenue 50. The fuel center will include dispensing of motor vehicle fuel, an automobile-related air/water unit, and an 825 sq. ft. mini-mart that will offer the sale of convenience dry goods and general merchandise, lottery tickets, refrigerated dairy/deli products and prepared food and drinks. The sale of beer, wine and alcohol would be prohibited. Hours of operation for the fuel center (including the mini mart) will be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Similar to the fuel center hours of operation, deliveries for the entire shopping center will be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. per Mitigation Measure NOI-8 (Exhibit A). Traffic/Circulation There are no new changes to the project vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The vehicular circulation includes access from four driveways, two along Jefferson Street and two along Avenue 50. Two driveways will be restricted to right-in, right-out movements. The north driveway along Jefferson Street will be restricted to right-in, right-out and left-in movements. The easternmost driveway along Avenue 50 is proposed to allow full movements in and out of the site. The applicant proposes full movements at this driveway to facilitate access to the supermarket and fuel center. Pedestrian connectivity has been enhanced with pronounced stamped concrete walkways and same treatment at the driveway entrances to the site. Architecture The architectural style is proposed to be contemporary utilizing materials such as glass, wood, and various metals (Attachment 3). Building forms are designed with clean, sharp horizontal and vertical planes. Architectural detailing has been enhanced using building projections and varying rooflines. Some of the building tenant spaces facing the plaza area are set back approximately 3-5 feet and also include awning canopies that project out 5-13 feet from the building face to allow for outdoor retail operations and activity and al fresco dining under shade. Unique shade features were added to the plaza to allow for gathering/seating spaces under shade. Variations in building color and materials are provided along elevations facing Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street to break up building mass. Architectural plans (Attachment 2) show elevations, roof plans, and shell plans for the Pavilions building and fuel center, Retail 1, Shops 1 and Buildings 3 through 6. These buildings are representative examples of the proposed architecture of the site. The architectural design of other retail pad buildings, Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10, will require separate SDP approval since they are not included in this package. A condition of approval is imposed that the architectural design of Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 shall match the architectural design of the currently proposed buildings. Buildings 5 and 6 have been revised to create an architectural statement at the “iconic corner” of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, in response to comments from Council. The architecture remains a contemporary style consistent with the 224 remainder of the center and features two buildings with slanted rooflines, “wings,” that converge upward toward each other, creating a walking corridor in between. The building wings reach a height of 35 feet at their highest point. Landscaping and Lighting Landscaping for the project includes desert tolerant, water efficient plants (Attachment 2). The plans include landscape berms within the landscape setbacks along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 to improve views into drive-through facilities and parking areas. Additional landscape treatment is proposed along the project’s western wall behind the Pavilions building to screen it from the views of the residences to the west. The applicant has revised the plant palette to include different shade trees including African Sumac and Tipuana Tipu trees in the parking area along with several palm varieties to enhance the architectural statement of the shopping center. In response to concerns regarding shading, the applicant revised the landscape plan to add more shade trees in addition to the palms. The shading plan shows 70% shading of the parking lot which exceeds the minimum 50% required by the Code. Additionally, pindo palms are placed at the four entrances to create a sense of arrival. Landscaping at the corner area consists of various shrubs including bougainvillea, barrel cactus, cassia and Mexican bird of paradise and Washingtonia Hybrid palm trees within the plaza for shade, along with three triangular shaped shade structures. Regarding vacant pads and maintenance, conditions of approval have been incorporated. SDP Condition #109 requires vacant pads to be fully landscaped prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store. Additionally, to address landscape and property maintenance, the applicant will be required to record maintenance obligations in their CC&R’s, to which the City would be a third- party beneficiary (SDP Conditions #113 and 114), as well as enter into a maintenance agreement with the neighboring HOA’s (Renaissance and Palmilla), to which the City also would be a third-party beneficiary (SDP Condition #115). Parking lot lighting for the project will consist of LED lighting, no taller than 20 feet, which complies with height limits of the CC District (Attachment 2). Additionally, the conditions of approval restrict the height of the lights on the back of the Pavilions building to under 20 feet to reduce lighting impacts on the Renaissance neighborhood to the west. Tentative Parcel Map The current parcel configuration consists of five parcels on the property. The TPM proposes to reconfigure the property into 13 parcels (Attachment 2) to accommodate 13 buildings. This change is in response to changes made to the site plan which led to an increase in parcels from 12 to 13. 225 Specific Plan Amendment The Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project includes proposed deviations from the City’s Zoning standards and permitted uses, including the addition of a provision to allow for taller buildings within image corridors (Attachment 1): •Reduce the minimum landscape setback along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 from 20 to 18 feet—a 10% reduction; •Allow retail stores over 50,000 sq. ft. as a permitted use (Pavilions building is proposed at 63,000 sq. ft.); •Allow maximum building height to be 40 feet, per the underlying CC zone, within 150 feet of the Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street rights-of-way; •Allow a fuel center (automobile service station without repair facilities) as a permitted use, in conjunction with an anchor tenant. Should a fuel center be proposed without an anchor tenant, it would be subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP); • Modify the current Master Design Theme from Spanish Mediterranean style to a Contemporary style; and •Remove the sign program under the current Specific Plan to allow future sign programs to be considered without a SPA. Additionally, since Buildings 5 and 6 have been revised to include architectural “wing” roofline features, the SPA would need to be revised to incorporate an alternative development standard to the current image corridor height limit in the underlying zone. Per Section 9.90.040 of the Municipal Code, building height along image corridors is limited to 22 feet within 150 feet of the roadway. The following language would be incorporated into the SPA: “To accommodate variation in building design, the maximum building height shall be 40 feet, per the underlying CC zone, including within the first 150 feet of the Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street rights-of-way.” The General Plan has designated various roadways within the City as image corridors. These mainly consist of arterial roadways such as Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. The General Plan states that scenic resources are varied and diverse and include varied streetscapes as well as mountain views. The buildings proposed at the Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 corner contribute to varying streetscapes by providing architectural variation in rooflines, architectural projections and treatments, and creates visual interest, thus remaining consistent with the spirit and intent of the image corridor program. PUBLIC NOTICE The public hearing notice was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on June 26, 2020 and was sent to property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project site, in accordance with Section 9.200.100 of the Municipal Code. Because the project was continued to a date certain, December 15, 2020, public notice was not required; however, surrounding HOA representatives and interested parties were notified. 226 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) be prepared for the proposed project. Since the proposed project is essentially the same as the originally approved project in 1999 and amended in 2002, the MND reviewed the difference in the project between what was approved and what is currently proposed, (25,340 sq. ft. increase) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 regarding subsequent environmental review. The MND included mitigation measures from the previous environmental documents and proposed new mitigation measures where necessary. The MND was distributed to the City’s responsible agencies and sent to interested members of the public. Thirteen comments were received during the 30-day comment period. Responses to these comments were sent to each commenting party. Comments and responses are included in the Final MND, which has been included in Exhibit A of the proposed Resolution. The MND has been revised, subsequent to circulation for public review, to be consistent with the findings of the updated traffic analysis, to consider the request to exceed the image corridor building height standard and to add suggested air quality mitigation measures from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. These revisions do not introduce any new significant impacts and do not trigger the need to recirculate the Draft MND for public review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. ALTERNATIVES 1.Council may elect to adopt the MND and approve the SPA, TPM and SDP, with the conditions of approval as presented, or with modified conditions of approval, including the height allowance in the SPA. 2.Council may elect to adopt the MND and approve the SPA and TPM as presented, and to modify the SDP application to remove Buildings 5 and 6 from this application and include only the Pavilions Building, Retail 1, Shops 1, Buildings 3, 4, and 7 to give the applicant more time to refine the design of Buildings 5 and 6. Under this alternative, a condition of approval is imposed that the applicant shall submit a subsequent SDP application and shall obtain SDP approval for Buildings 5 and 6 prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Pavilions building. 3.Council may elect not to adopt the MND and not to approve the SPA, TPM and SDP, which would leave SP 1998-034 Amendment No. 1 effective over the project site and a commercial shopping center project could be developed under that 2002 entitlement. 4.Council may continue the public hearing for all applications and provide further direction on the design of the project. Prepared by: Cheri Flores, Planning Manager Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Specific Plan Modifications 2.Entitlement Plan Set 3. Colors and Materials Sample Exhibit 227 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0006 APPLICANT: LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 7th day of July, 2020, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Lundin Development Company for approval of the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center consisting of up to 125,800 sq. ft., generally located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 more particularly described as: APN 602-180-004 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on June 26, 2020 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 6, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, at the applicant’s request, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California at the October 6, 2020 meeting did refer a portion of the application back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation on adding a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did discuss on November 24, 2020 a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors and did not recommend the City Council add this provision; and 228 Council Resolution 2020 - Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on July 7, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, at the applicant’s request, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on May 5, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, at the applicant’s request, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearings on February 4 and March 3, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on December 10, 2019, where the Planning Commission recommended approval of this project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 8, 2019 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 26, 2018 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the traffic study and include an analysis of other intersections in the area; and WHEREAS, Environmental Assessment 1998-375 was adopted by the City Council on May 18, 1999 (City Council Resolution 1999-62) and analyzed the original project consisting of an approximate 110,000 sq. ft. shopping center, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 229 Council Resolution 2020 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 3 of 5 WHEREAS, an addendum to Environmental Assessment 1998-375 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the CEQA and approved by the City Council on February 19, 2002 (City Council Resolution 2002-30), which analyzed an amendment to the project reducing the size of the shopping center to approximately 100,460 sq. ft.; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the CEQA, and determined that the project was substantially similar to the original project and amendment but that one or more conditions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 had been met requiring a subsequent analysis and determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) be prepared to analyze the difference in impacts from the originally adopted MND (Environmental Assessment 1998-375) and subsequent addendum to the currently proposed project. The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.250.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of Environmental Assessment 2017-0006: 1.As conditioned, proposed application will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2017-0006. 2.The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 230 Council Resolution 2020 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: December 15, 2020 Page 4 of 5 3.There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources of the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4.The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable can be mitigated to be less than significant. 5.The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Impacts associated with noise and air quality can be mitigated to be less than significant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; SECTION 2. That the City Council does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the “Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 ‘Pavilion Palms’ Shopping Center La Quinta, CA”, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, enclosed as Exhibit A and incorporated herewith by this reference, for Environmental Assessment 2017-0006. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 15TH day of December, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 231 Council Resolution 2020 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopte: December 15, 2020 Page 5 of 5 ABSTAIN: __________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ WILLIAM IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 232 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center La Quinta, CA EA2017-0006 Prepared for Lead Agency: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Prepared by: Jericho Systems, Inc. 47 N. First Street, 1st Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 307-5633 March 2018 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX 233 [this page left intentionally blank] 234 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1  SECTION 2 – REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................... 2  SECTION 3 - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 3  SECTION 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM .................................................................... 8  I. AESTHETICS ..................................................................................................... 13  II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: ......................................... 16  III. AIR QUALITY .................................................................................................... 19  IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................. 26  V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: ............................................................................... 31  VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS .................................................................................... 36  VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: ................................................................... 40  VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ............................................... 44  IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: ....................................................... 47  X. LAND USE AND PLANNING: .......................................................................... 51  XI. MINERAL RESOURCES: .................................................................................. 53  XII. NOISE: ................................................................................................................ 54  XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: ....................................................................... 62  XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES: .......................................................................................... 64  XV. RECREATION .................................................................................................... 66  XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: ....................................................................... 67  XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: ................................................................ 73  XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: ........................................................... 75  SECTION 5 - SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................... 80  SECTION 6 - REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 84  FIGURES Figure 1 Regional Overview ......................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2 Site Location ................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3 Site Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 7 235 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page ii TABLES Table 1 Proposed Site Plan ........................................................................................................................... 4  Table 2 Summer Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) ..................................................... 20  Table 3 Winter Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) ........................................................ 21  Table 4 Summer Operational Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) ....................................................... 22  Table 5 Winter Operational Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day)......................................................... 23  Table 6 Localized Significance Thresholds (Pounds per Day) ................................................................... 24   Table 7 Greenhouse Gas Construction Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) ................................................ 41  Table 8 Greenhouse Gas Operational Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) .................................................. 42  Table 9 Construction Equipment Noise Emission Levels ........................................................................... 55  Table 10 Vibration Source Levels for Typical Construction Equipment.................................................... 56  Table 11 Existing and Projected Future Operational Noise ........................................................................ 58  Table 12 Existing Conditions – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street .................................................................. 69  Table 13 Opening Day – With Project – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street ..................................................... 69  Table 14 Future Buildout (Year 2035) – With Project – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street ............................ 69  APPENDICES Appendix A Site Lighting Plan  Appendix B Air Quality Model Results  Appendix C Biological Resources Report  Appendix D Cultural Resources Report  Appendix E Noise Study  Appendix F Traffic Studies  Appendix G City of La Quinta Engineering Bulletin 06-13    236 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 1 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION Background La Quinta is a resort city in the Coachella Valley of Riverside County located between Indian Wells and Indio. As of the 2010 census, the population was approximately 37,000, up from the 2000 census, which recorded approximately 24,000. The city limits encompass approximately 37 miles and are generally bounded on the west by Washington Street and the Santa Rosa Mountains, on the north by lands south of Hovley Lane East, on the east by Jefferson Street and Monroe Street, and on the south by Avenue 62 and Avenue 64 (Figure 1). Topographically, the City is situated on a flat valley floor surrounded by low mountains, foothills and alluvial fans characteristic of the desert environment. The valley floor is the site of most of the City’s developed areas, while surrounding mountains and foothills have been designated and are retained as open space. The City has historically contained large areas of agriculture on the valley floor, but this has changed in recent years with increased urbanization. Development within the City limits is now primarily residential, commercial and resort oriented (Terra Nova, July 2012). Hwy 111, a major thoroughfare that provides access to most of the cities in the Coachella Valley, bisects the city’s northern portion. A majority of the major commercial and resort facilities are found along Hwy 111, with the remainder of the city designed for residential and light commercial/retail. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan of Land Use and associated parcel map to allow for the development of 100,460 square feet of a supermarket- anchored shopping center with adjacent retail pads on 12.5 acres at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue. The parcel is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The Specific Plan adoption included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. In 2002, an amendment to the Specific Plan was also adopted. To date, that project has not been constructed. On February 19. 2013, the City of La Quinta adopted the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its 2035 General Plan (SCH# 2010111094) which included the impacts of adding to commercial uses within the City, including the approved Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was also adopted for environmental impacts that could not be mitigated to a level below significance for: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic (Resolution 2013-009). Currently, the Lundin Development is requesting the City to authorize Amendment No. 2 to the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan to change the name of the approved Specific Plan to “Pavilion Palms” and construct a total of 125,800 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center and adjacent retail pads on the 12.5-acre site at the corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue, within the same area of the previously- approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, and its subsequent amendment. Amendment No. 2 would add 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses. Proposed uses within the commercial center development are similar to the previously approved plan, and include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 3). 237 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 2 SECTION 2 – REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The City of La Quinta has identified that the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Project meets the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 definition of a Project. CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 defines a Project as the following: (a) "Project" means the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. This document is an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including all criteria, standards, and procedures of CEQA (California Public Resource Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq.). This IS/MND is an informational document intended for use by the City of La Quinta, City Council and Responsible agencies, and members of the general public in evaluating the physical environmental effects of the proposed Project. It was compiled by the City of La Quinta with the assistance of Jericho Systems Inc. (Jericho). The City of La Quinta is serving as the Lead Agency for the proposed Project pursuant to CEQA §21067 and CEQA Guidelines Article 4 and §15367. “Lead Agency” refers to the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a Project. Organization of the Initial Study The Initial Study is organized as follows: Introduction: Provides the regulatory context for the review along a brief summary of the CEQA process. Project Information: Provides fundamental Project information, such as the Project description, Project location and figures. Lead Agency Determination: Identifies environmental factors potentially affected by the Project and identifies the Lead Agency's determination based on the initial evaluation. Mitigated Negative Declaration: Prepared when a determination can be made that no significant environmental effects will occur because revisions to the Project have been made or mitigation measures will be implemented which will reduce all potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Monitoring Program Table: Identifies objectives, criteria, and specific procedures to administer the SBVWCD’s responsibilities under CEQA. Evaluating Environmental Impacts: Provides the parameters the SBVWCD uses when determining level of impact. CEQA Checklist: Provides an environmental checklist and accompanying analysis for responding to checklist questions. References: Includes a list of references and various resources utilized in preparing the analysis. 238 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 3 SECTION 3 - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Introduction Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to amend the previously approved Fairway Specific Plan by changing the name to “Pavilion Palms,” and constructing a total of 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 would add 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses to the 100,460 square feet previously approved. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include the same uses as previously approved, including banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 3). The site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The amended Project, with the 125,800 square feet represents approximately 0.22 FAR, below the maximum allowed under the City’s General Plan. The Assessor Parcel Numbers for this Project are: APNs: 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602- 180-013, and 602-180-014. Per the City of La Quinta General Plan, the Project site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) for commercial use. The site is bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by residential development that fronts Jess Anne Drive, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. Detailed Project Description Site Plan The Project site consists of five parcels that total approximately 12 acres. The proposed Project will be anchored by Pavilions grocery store and includes restaurants, banks, and retail units, as well as a fuel center/convenience market. In total, the proposed development would provide approximately 125,800 square feet (sf) of gross floor area, which is detailed by building and proposed use in Table 1. Construction Scenario The site is currently vacant, so no demolition of existing structures are necessary. The project is anticipated to be constructed and opened to the public in approximately two years. For this analysis, the project opening day is assumed to be in the year 2020. Grading The site is relatively flat and contains sparse desert scrub. Soil balancing will be used during grading so that there will be no soil import or export. The desert scrub brush on site will be removed or buried depending on size and type. 239 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 4 Site Utilities All utilities are available for connection from the main lines located within the paved rights of way along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. Site Ingress/Egress Development Access to the Project is proposed via five driveways (labeled A-E in Figure 3): two to the south on Avenue 50, two to the east on Jefferson Street, and one to the north on Derek Alan Drive. Table 1 Proposed Site Plan 240 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 5 Figure 1 Regional Overview 241 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 6 Figure 2 Site Location 242 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 7 Figure 3 Site Plan 243 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 8 Section 4 - Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center 2. Lead Agency Name: City of La Quinta Address: 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person: Cheri Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 8-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone Number: (760) 777-7000 4. Project Location: Assessor Parcel Numbers 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602-180-013, and 602-180-014 0660-081-30 Intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 5. Project Sponsor’s Lundin Development Name and Address: 16400 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 207 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) 7. Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) 8. Project Description Summary: Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to amend the previously approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan by changing the name to “Pavilion Palms,” and constructing a total of 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12- acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 would add 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses to the 100,460 square feet previously approved. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include the same uses as previously approved, including banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 3). The site is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The proposed Project will be anchored by Pavilions grocery store and includes restaurants, banks, and retail units, as well as a fuel center/convenience market. The project is anticipated to be constructed and opened to the public in approximately two years. For this analysis, the project opening day is assumed to be in the year 2020. Prior approvals for this site include the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan and associated Amendment No. 1, which was approved by the City of La Quinta in 1999 and 2002, respectively. That plan identified the development of 100,460 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center with adjacent retail pads on 12.5 acres at the corner of Jefferson Street 50th Avenue. The 1998 and 2002 244 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 9 Specific Plan adoption included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. That project was not constructed. On February 19. 2013, the City of La Quinta adopted the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its 2035 General Plan (SCH# 2010111094) which included the impacts of adding to commercial uses within the City, including the approved Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was also adopted for environmental impacts that could not be mitigated to a level below significance for: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic (Resolution 2013-009). The Proposed Project represents Amendment No. 2 to the existing, approved Specific Plan. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The site is located on a vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 2). The site is bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by a large retention basin with residential development west of the retention basin, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development within the City of Indio, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. 10. Lead Agency Discretionary Actions: Discretionary actions that may be taken by the Lead Agency include, but are not limited to, the following:  Grading Plan approval  Approval of an Amendment to SP98-034 Fairway Plaza Specific Plan (SP2017-0002)  Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 (TPM2017-0003)  Approval of Site Development Permit (SDP2017-0009) 11. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.): Construction Compliance – Stormwater Discharge. Construction projects that disturb 1 acre of land or more are required to obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities (General Construction Permit), which requires the applicant to file a notice of intent (NOI) to discharge stormwater and to prepare and implement a SWPPP. The SWPPP includes an overview of the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be implemented to prevent soil erosion and discharge of other construction-related pollutants that could contaminate nearby water resources. Federal, State and Local permits for the fuel station, as required. 12. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun? Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083.3.2.) 245 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 10 Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality. The City of La Quinta initiated AB52 process began October 3, 2017. Letters were sent to tribes on the list received from the Native American Heritage Commission. Responses were received from Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (Cabazon), Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) and Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians (Twenty-Nine Palms). The Cultural Study from CRM Tech was sent to ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms as requested. Both ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms asked for approved Native American Monitors from the ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms to be present during ground disturbing activities of the project construction. 246 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 11 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ̀ Aesthetics . Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology & Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation / Traffic Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation, the following finding is made: The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature (prepared by Jericho Systems, Inc.) Date Signature (Lead Agency, City of La Quinta) Date 3/22/2018 3/22/2018 247 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 12 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. d) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 248 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 13 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply I. Aesthetics Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Environmental Setting La Quinta includes a mixture of building types built over various time periods, and with a variety of architectural styles. Development includes structures built in the early twentieth century, and new master- planned communities built within the last decade. Architectural styles include those typical of Spanish Colonial, Mediterranean, Contemporary, Tuscan, and Modern styles. Spanish Colonial architecture is the most prevalent style used in La Quinta, and examples include the La Quinta Resort & Spa and Old Towne in the Village (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). The Project site is currently vacant. The surrounding land use designations consist primarily of residential and commercial. The site is bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by a retention basin with residential development west of the retention basin, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store. Consistent with the approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, the Project, as revised, will still contain design elements consistent with the City’s design standards, including Contemporary architectural style using arched colonnades with tile roofs. Additional architectural elements such as textured finishes, roundels, accent tile and raised trellises will be used to provide further details and interest, thus further enhancing the individual buildings and the quality appearance of the shopping center in general. The landscaped setbacks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street will incorporate sidewalks with a variety of trees, shrubs and flowers, which accompanied by the parking lot landscaping, are designed to provide an inviting atmosphere to draw shoppers to the center. Impact Analysis a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 249 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 14 Less Than Significant Impact. The CEQA Guidelines do not provide a definition of what constitutes a “scenic vista” or “scenic resource” or a reference as to from what vantage point(s) the scenic vista and/or resource, if any, should be observed. However, a scenic vista can generally be defined as a viewpoint from a public vantage that provides expansive views of a highly-valued landscape for the benefit of the general public. Common examples include undeveloped hillsides, ridgelines, and open space areas that provide a unifying visual backdrop to a developed area. Scenic resources can generally be defined as those landscape patterns and features that are visually or aesthetically pleasing and that contribute affirmatively to the definition of a distinct community or region such as trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings. The Project site currently consists of vacant, disturbed land. The Project site is not considered to be a scenic vista. As previously discussed, the surrounding land uses include residential and commercial use. The heights of the proposed buildings are consistent with the municipal code and other commercial areas in the vicinity, and are not considered to be obtrusive when compared to the surrounding area. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The Project is not located within a state scenic highway, and therefore, no impact to trees or rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within a state scenic highway would occur. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site currently consists of vacant, disturbed land. As previously discussed, the surrounding land uses include residential and commercial uses. The height and scale of the proposed buildings are consistent with other commercial areas in the vicinity, and is not considered to be obtrusive when compared to the surrounding area. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of La Quinta does not permit construction activities outside of daylight hours, so the construction associated with the proposed Project would not cause the emission of light beyond existing circumstances in that area. Within the City limits, the majority of lands are developed, and daytime and nighttime skies are already impacted to a limited extent by light and glare. The site lighting includes 14 poles for the entire 540,989 square foot lot. The lighting plan identifies the use of LED lighting placed in a manner where the light will spread out uniformly across the lot while maintaining a lower power density. Based on the photometric plans, there is almost no leakage onto off site areas. The light intensity begins to fade long before reaching anywhere outside the lot. A lighting plan and study was completed on August 21, 2017 by Innovative Design Engineers (Appendix A). The dual head pole in the southwest corner will need to be shielded to prevent spillage into the residential area. 250 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 15 Additionally, California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 (Building Energy Efficiency Standards), establishes requirements for outdoor lighting for residential and nonresidential development. The standards regulate lighting characteristics such as maximum power and brightness, shielding, and sensor controls to turn lighting on and off. The City requires that commercial structures comply with Title 24. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006 No mitigation measures were identified to be associated with the previously-approved project. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): AES-1 Provide shielding for the dual head pole in the southwest corner as per the lighting design engineering recommendations. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 251 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 16 II. Agriculture and Forestry Resources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Environmental Setting Agriculture has historically been a major economic sector in the eastern portion of the Coachella Valley, including La Quinta. Although most of the farms have within the incorporated regions of La Quinta no longer exist, agriculture is still an economic factor east of the incorporated boundary, within the proposed Sphere of Influence and beyond. (Terra Nova, July 2012). The Riverside County Important Farmland 2016 Map, developed by the California Department of Conservation, highlights areas within the Coachella Valley that are important agricultural producing lands. Prime Farmland includes areas with both good physical and chemical attributes able to sustain 252 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 17 long-term agriculture production. Unique Farmland areas produce crops of statewide importance; however contain lower quality soils than those within Prime Farmland. The site was formerly utilized for citrus grove farming, but the groves were removed in the early 1990s. The site is identified by the State of California Department of Conservation as Farmlands of Local Importance. Farmland of Local Importance are lands generally without irrigation, and which produce dry crops that may be important locally, but are not important for statewide agriculture production. The Project site is currently vacant land that is zoned for commercial uses. Impact Analysis a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Less Than Significant. The site was formerly utilized for citrus grove farming, but the groves were removed in the early 1990s. The site is identified by the State of California Department of Conservation as Farmlands of Local Importance. Farmland of Local Importance are lands generally without irrigation, and which produce dry crops that may be important locally, but are not important for statewide agriculture production. The Project site is only approximately 12 acres which is not suitable for sustainable commercial crops. The City of La Quinta has designated the Site as Community Commercial for development of commercial use. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to this criterion because while the site is designated for local importance, it is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. There are no agricultural or Williamson Act contract lands within the Project site. Therefore, no impact would occur. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project site currently consists of vacant land, and is zoned Community Commercial (CC). The Project site does not contain forest land. Therefore, no impact would occur. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. There is no forest land in the Project area. Therefore, no impact would occur in this regard. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non- forest use? 253 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 18 No Impact. The Project Area consists of vacant, disturbed land and is zoned Community Commercial (CC). Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 254 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 19 III. Air Quality Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Environmental Setting Lundin Development is proposing a 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center project on approximately 12 acres. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved a 100,460 square-foot mixed-use commercial center Specific Plan for the 12-acre Project Site. The approval of the Specific Plan included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The City also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR on February 19, 2013. Therefore, the analysis herein is based on the net increase of approximately 25,340 square-feet of new uses not previously reviewed or approved in the 1999 Specific Plan and subsequent 2012 Updated General Plan. Impact Analysis – Air Quality a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant. The Project Site is located in the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has jurisdiction over air quality issues and regulations within the SSAB. The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin establishes a program of rules and regulations administered by SCAQMD to obtain attainment of the state and federal air quality standards. The most recent AQMP (AQMP 2016) was adopted by the SCAQMD on March 3, 2017. The 2016 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories. The 2016 AQMP was adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Council on April 7, 2016. 255 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 20 The Proposed Project is located within the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation of the Specific Plan/General Plan. The proposed mixed-use commercial uses are allowed within the CC land use area which have been reviewed and approved within the 2012 General Plan update. Approval of the proposed revision would not require a zone change nor a General Plan Amendment. Therefore, approval of the Proposed Project would not conflict with the AQMP. Less than significant impact is anticipated. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?  Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions (based on net the increase of approximately 25,340 square-feet of new uses) were screened using California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.1 prepared by the SCAQMD (Appendix B). CalEEMod was used to estimate the on-site and off-site construction emissions. The emissions incorporate Rule 402 and 403 by default as required during construction. The criteria pollutants screened for include: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulates (PM10 and PM2.5). In addition, reactive organic gas (ROG) emissions are analyzed. Two of the analyzed pollutants, ROG and NOX, are ozone precursors. Both summer and winter season emission levels were estimated. Construction Emissions Construction emissions are considered short-term, temporary emissions and were modeled with the following construction parameters: site grading (mass and fine grading), building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The resulting emissions generated by construction of the Proposed Project are shown in Table 2 and Table 3, summer and winter construction emissions, respectively. As shown in Table 2 and Table 3, construction emissions would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds with the implementation of a 10-day painting schedule. Therefore, Mitigation Measure AIR-1 is recommended during the construction Phase: Table 2 Summer Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source/Phase ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 0.9 10.5 4.5 0.0 0.7 0.5 Grading 1.3 10.5 8.3 0.0 1.1 1.0 Building Construction 1.3 13.2 8.5 0.0 0.9 0.8 Paving 1.0 8.8 7.9 0.0 0.7 0.5 Architectural Coating 59.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 0.2 0.2 Highest Value (lbs/day) 59.0 13.2 8.5 0.0 1.1 1.0 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Summer Emissions. Phases do not overlap and represent the highest concentration. 256 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 21 Table 3 Winter Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source/Phase ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 0.9 10.5 4.5 0.0 0.7 0.5 Grading 1.3 10.5 8.3 0.0 1.1 1.0 Building Construction 1.3 13.2 8.5 0.0 0.9 0.8 Paving 1.0 8.8 7.9 0.0 0.7 0.5 Architectural Coating 59.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 0.2 0.2 Highest Value (lbs/day) 59.0 13.2 8.5 0.0 1.1 1.0 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Winter Emissions. Phases do not overlap and represent the highest concentration. Compliance with SCAQMD Rules 402, and 403 Although the Proposed Project does not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction emissions, the Applicant would be required to comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations as the SSAB is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM10). Compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402, and 403 The Project Applicant would be required to comply with Rules 402 nuisance, and 403 fugitive dust, which require the implementation of Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) for each fugitive dust source, and the AQMP, which identifies Best Available Control Technologies (BACTs) for area sources and point sources. The BACMs and BACTs would include, but not be limited to the following: 1. The Project Proponent shall ensure that any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre-watered prior to the onset of grading activities. a. The Project Proponent shall ensure that watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on-going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly (2 times daily) to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface and shall be watered at the end of each workday. b. The Project Proponent shall ensure that all disturbed areas are treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. c. The Project Proponent shall ensure that landscaped areas are installed as soon as o reduce the potential for wind erosion. d. The Project Proponent shall ensure that all grading activities are suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, would increase NOX and PM10 levels in the area. Although the Proposed Project does not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during construction, the Applicant/Contractor would be required to implement the following conditions as required by SCAQMD: 257 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 22 1. To reduce emissions, all equipment used in grading and construction must be tuned and maintained to the manufacturer’s specification to maximize efficient burning of vehicle fuel. 2. The Project Proponent shall ensure that existing power sources are utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on-site power generation during construction. 3. The Project Proponent shall ensure that construction personnel are informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. All buildings on the Project Site shall conform to energy use guidelines in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. 5. The operator shall maintain and effectively utilize and schedule on-site equipment in order to minimize exhaust emissions from truck idling. 6. The operator shall comply with all existing and future California Air Resources Board (CARB) and SCAQMD regulations related to diesel-fueled trucks, which may include among others: (1) meeting more stringent emission standards; (2) retrofitting existing engines with particulate traps; (3) use of low sulfur fuel; and (4) use of alternative fuels or equipment. Operational Emissions The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Albert Grover & Associates on July 27, 2017. The TIA determined that the shopping center would generate approximately 13,328 daily trips (See Table 4 of Appendix F). Trips were broken down by land use and land use size. The TIA also included a 20-percent reduction in traffic to account for pass- by-credit. As the Proposed Project is evaluated as the Specific Plan delta of 25,340 square-feet of new uses (approximately 20 percent greater than was approved in the Specific Plan), 4,513 daily trips (approximately 34 percent of the development based on more intense uses) were modeled to represent a worst-case scenario. Emissions associated with the Proposed Project’s estimated vehicle trips were modeled and are listed in Table 3 and Table 4, summer and winter operational emissions, respectively. As shown, both summer and winter season operational emissions are below SCAQMD thresholds. Impacts are anticipated to be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. Table 4 Summer Operational Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Energy 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mobile 8.2 45.8 41.7 0.1 5.5 1.6 Totals (lbs/day) 8.9 46.5 42.2 0.1 5.5 1.6 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significance No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Summer Emissions. 258 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 23 Table 5 Winter Operational Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Energy 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mobile 6.7 44.7 42.2 0.0 5.5 1.6 Totals (lbs/day) 7.4 45.4 42.2 0.0 5.5 1.6 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significance No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Winter Emissions. The Proposed Project does not exceed applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds during the short-term construction phase with the implementation of at a minimum 10-day painting schedule or operational activities and the associated impacts are considered to be less than significant with the mitigation measure incorporated. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant. The project was previously reviewed and approved as the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center, Project 2002-06, designed to provide approximately 100,460 square feet of retail space with accommodating parking and landscaping areas The Proposed Project, revised as the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center, includes the original 100,460 square feet of retail space with accommodating parking and landscape area plus an additional 25,340 square-feet of complementary uses. The additional uses would not cumulatively generate a considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant nor violate any air quality standard during construction and operation of the Proposed Project (refer to Table 2 through Error! Reference source not found.). The site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The proposed Project represents approximately 0.22 FAR. Therefore, because the Project proposes to use less than the maximum allowed under the zoning, a less than significant impact is anticipated. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant. SCAQMD has developed a methodology to assess the localized impacts of emissions from a Proposed Project as outlined within the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology report; completed in June 2003 and revised in July 2008. The use of Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) is voluntary, to be implemented at the discretion of local public agencies acting as a lead agency pursuant to CEQA. Although the proposed use would not exceed SCAQMD Thresholds (Table 2 through Table 4) LSTs, including the restaurant drive-through facilities, were evaluated to further demonstrate at a local level that impacts would be less than significant. LSTs would typically only apply to projects that must undergo CEQA or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and are five acres or less. Although the Proposed Project calls for 5.78 acres of net development, LST methodology will be incorporated to represent worst-case scenario emissions thresholds. CalEEMod version 2016.3.1 was used to estimate the on-site and off-site construction emissions. The LSTs were developed to analyze the significance of potential air quality impacts of proposed projects to sensitive receptors (i.e. schools, single family residences, etc.) and provides screening tables for small projects (one, two, or five acres). Projects are evaluated based on geographic location and distance from the sensitive receptor (25, 50, 100, 200, or 500 meters form the site). 259 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 24 For the purposes of a CEQA analysis, the SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a receptor such as residence, hospital, convalescent facility or anywhere that it is possible for an individual to remain for 24 hours. Additionally, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities can also be considered as sensitive receptors. Commercial and industrial facilities are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because employees do not typically remain on-site for a full 24 hours, but are usually present for shorter periods of time, such as eight hours. The Proposed Project includes approximately 12 acres of development. The “5 acres scenario” was used to represent a worst-case scenario as the larger the site the greater the emission allowance. The Project Site is located at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 and is bordered to the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development, to the west by Jess Anne Drive and residential development, to the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and to the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. The nearest sensitive receptor land uses are the residential developments located adjacent to the north, west, and south boundary of the Project Site and therefore LSTs are based on a 25-meter distance. A comparison of the construction and operational emissions with the appropriate LST, per distance from the Project Site boundary (geographical area of Source Receptor Area (SRA) No. 30 – Coachella Valley; 5-acre site) according to the SCAQMD Mass Rate Look-up Tables, are listed in Table 6. Table 6 Localized Significance Thresholds (Pounds per Day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Construction Emissions (Max. from Table 2 and/or Table 3) 13.2 8.5 1.1 1.0 Operational Emissions (Max. Total from Table 4 and/or Table 5)1 4.6 4.2 0.6 0.6 Highest Value (lbs/day) 13.2 8.5 1.1 0.6 1.0 0.6 LST Thresholds 132 2,292 14* 4† 8* 2† Greater Than Threshold No No No No No No Note: PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are separated into construction and operational thresholds in accordance with the SCAQMD Mass Rate LST Look-up Tables. * Construction emissions LST threshold † Operational emissions LST threshold 1 Per LST Methodology, mobile source emissions do not need to be included except for land use emissions and on-site vehicle emissions. It is estimated that approximately 10% of mobile emissions will occur on the Project Site. Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Summer & Winter Emissions; SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology; SCAQMD Mass Rate Look-up Tables for 5-acre site in SRA No. 30, distance of 25 meters. As shown in Table 6, the Proposed Project’s emissions are not anticipated to exceed the LSTs. Therefore, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Less than significant impact is anticipated and no mitigation measures are required. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant. The Proposed Project does not contain land uses typically associated with the emission of objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the Proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities; and the temporary storage of domestic solid waste (refuse) associated with the Projects’ long- term operational uses. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts resulting from construction activity. Any construction odor emissions generated would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of 260 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 25 construction activity. It is expected that Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City of La Quinta’s solid waste regulations. The Project would be also required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the Proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006:  All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition, and shall be properly serviced and repaired as needed. ꞏ  Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the project proponent shall demonstrate, or cause to be demonstrated to the Community Development Department that all construction equipment to be utilized shall be low emission, or how the use of low emission construction equipment is infeasible.  Low VOC paints, primers and coatings shall be required for all buildings on the project site. All paints shall be applied using either a high volume/low pressure spray or by hand.  The proposed project shall provide a bus turnout, shelter and associated improvements on Jefferson Street and on Avenue 50, unless Sunline Transit provides written confirmation-that no such turnout(s) or shelters are needed.  As required by the Municipal Code, the businesses operating within the proposed project shall conform to the Transportation Demand Management requirements in place at the time they begin operation.  Deliveries to the project site shall occur during off-peak periods. Mitigation Measures: AIR-1: Contractor is to implement at a minimum a 10-day painting schedule. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 261 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 26 IV. Biological Resources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Environmental Setting The subject parcel is mapped on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) – La Quinta, 7.5-Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle Map near the southern boundary of Section 32, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. The elevation of the center of the project site is 34 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The existing topography of this site is relatively flat. The soils within the subject parcel consist of Myoma fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes and Myoma fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopes. This soil type consists of wind-blown sandy alluvium and is somewhat excessively drained. The local climatic conditions in the project area are characterized by hot summers, mild winters, infrequent rainfall, and low humidity. The average annual temperature ranges from an average low of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (° F) in December to an average high of 107° F in July-August. The rainy season begins in November and continues through March, with the quantity and frequency of rain varying from year to year. The average annual rainfall is approximately 3.15 inches. 262 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 27 Biological Surveys Jericho Systems, Inc. (Jericho) prepared a General Biological Resources Assessment and Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Review in May 2017 (Jericho, May 23, 2017). The City of La Quinta falls entirely within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) area. The subject parcel is not located within or adjacent a Conservation Area. The CVMSHCP requires a habitat assessment for the burrowing owl (BUOW). If habitat for the BUOW is present, a focused survey is required. Several sensitive species have been documented within the vicinity of the subject parcel, including the State- and/or federally-listed as threatened or endangered flat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii), Coachella Valley milk-vetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae) and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata), as well as burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), which is considered a Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). On May 7, 2017, Jericho Biologist Eugene Jennings conducted a systematic and comprehensive pedestrian survey on site to assess the habitat suitability for burrowing owl to satisfy the requirements set forth in the CVMSHCP and to determine if focused presence/absence surveys for any of the species would be required. The habitat assessment included a 100 percent coverage pedestrian field survey, and adherence to the MSHCP Burrowing Owl California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) survey protocols. Surveys were conducted during optimal burrowing owl activity times, consistent with conservation ethics, systematic and covered all habitat types on the site, and during a good rainfall year. Survey Results The biological survey report (Jericho, May 23, 2017) indicated that the entire subject parcel is within an urban developed area and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land that has previously been rough graded. The project site is completely disturbed, consisting entirely of previously graded soils with sparse weedy vegetation and re-sprouted creosote bush scrub (Larrea tridentata Shrubland Alliance) associated species. Plant species observed on site include creosote, as well as ruderal and non-native species including, Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) and saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima). No suitable BUOW habitat was identified on site during the burrowing owl habitat assessment survey. Therefore, no additional protocol-level focused surveys will be required. No other listed or sensitive species or sensitive habitat were observed on the site. The subject parcel does not contain suitable habitat for any of the sensitive species that have been documented in the project vicinity. There were no stream channels, washes, or swales as defined by Section 1600 of the State of California Fish and Game Code (FGC) under jurisdiction of the CDFW, or “Waters of the United States” (WoUS) as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) within the subject parcel. 263 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 28 Impact Analysis a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant. Several sensitive species have been documented within the vicinity of the subject parcel, including the State- and/or federally-listed as threatened or endangered flat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii), Coachella Valley milk-vetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae) and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata), as well as burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), which is considered a Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The biological survey results identified that the entire subject parcel is within an urban developed area and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land that has previously been rough graded. No suitable BUOW habitat was identified on site during the burrowing owl habitat assessment survey; therefore, no additional protocol-level focused surveys are required. No other listed or sensitive species or sensitive habitat were observed on the site. The subject parcel does not contain suitable habitat for any of the sensitive species that have been documented in the project vicinity. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. Riparian communities occur along stream courses and drainages, and are floristically and structurally distinct from the adjacent upland communities. The biological survey results identified that the entire subject parcel is within an urban developed area and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land that has previously been rough graded. There were no stream channels, washes, or swales as defined by Section 1600 of the FGC under jurisdiction of the CDFW, or WoUS as defined by Section 404 of the CWA under the jurisdiction of the Corps within the subject parcel. The Project site is completely disturbed and barren with no hydrological process on site. There are no natural streams or drainages that traverse the Project site. The lack of hydrology on site makes it non-suitable for riparian habitat. No adverse impacts to riparian or sensitive natural habitat would occur. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. The biological survey results identified that the entire subject parcel is within an urban developed area and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land that has previously been rough graded. There were no stream channels, washes, or swales as defined by Section 1600 of the FGC under jurisdiction of the CDFW, or WoUS as defined by Section 404 of the CWA under the jurisdiction of the Corps within the subject parcel. The Project site is completely disturbed and barren with no hydrological process on site. There are no natural streams or drainages that traverse the Project site. The lack of hydrology on site makes it non-suitable for riparian habitat. Therefore, there is no impacts because no wetlands occur on site, nor are there fluvial processes where wetlands would be present. 264 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 29 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is surrounded by urban development. Additionally, the Project site itself is fully disturbed with no ability to provide movement of fish or wildlife species. Additionally, no known wildlife corridors are identified within the Project site or the immediate vicinity. No adverse impacts to wildlife movement would occur. However, the project site contains sparse weedy vegetation and re-sprouted creosote bush scrub (Larrea tridentata Shrubland Alliance) associated species, as well as ruderal and non-native species including, Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) and saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima), which represents potential foraging and nesting habitat for migratory bird species. The impacts for these bird species however, are not considered regionally or locally significant but the State of California prohibits the “take” of active bird nests. To avoid an illegal take of active bird nests, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is required to reduce impacts to less than significant. Mitigation measure BIO-1 is located at the end of this section. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. As biological resources, including threatened resources and habitat that could support such species, are not present on or near the Project site, no policies or ordinances protecting such resources would apply. This includes tree preservation policies. Therefore, there are no conflicts with local policies or ordinances. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Less Than Significant. The City of La Quinta falls entirely within the CVMSHCP area. The subject parcel is not located within or adjacent to a Conservation Area. The CVMSHCP requires a habitat assessment for the BUOW which requires focused surveys if present. Several sensitive species have been documented within the vicinity of the subject parcel, including the State- and/or federally-listed as threatened or endangered flat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii), Coachella Valley milk-vetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae) and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata), as well as burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), which is considered a Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). However, site surveys for the BUOW indicated that there is no suitable habitat for the BUOW or any sensitive species documented within the vicinity. Therefore, there are no conflicts with any adopted conservation plan. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. 265 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 30 Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): BIO – 1: Any grubbing, brushing or tree removal should be conducted outside of the State identified nesting season for migratory birds, which is typically March 15 through September 1. If work cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a migratory nesting bird survey within and adjacent to the project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three (3) days prior to initiating the construction activities. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) will be prepared and implemented. At a minimum, the NBP will include guidelines for addressing active nests, establishing buffers, monitoring, and reporting. The NBP will include a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and an appropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from direct and indirect impact. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be determined by the biologist, and shall be based on the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, and expected types of disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing, within which no vegetation clearing or ground disturbance shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and a monitoring report has been submitted, reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 266 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 31 V. Cultural Resources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleon- tological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X e) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code 21074? X Environmental Setting The Coachella Valley is a historical center of Native American settlement where a large number of Indian villages and rancherias were observed in the mid-nineteenth century. The Cahuilla people are generally divided, by anthropologists, into three groups, according to their geographic setting: the Pass Cahuilla in the Banning-Beaumont area, the Mountain Cahuilla in the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains and the Cahuilla Valley, and the Desert Cahuilla in the Coachella Valley. The Cahuilla did not have a single name that referred to an all-inclusive tribal affiliation. Membership was in terms of lineages or clans. Individual clans had villages, or central places, and territories they called their own. These were lands they considered theirs for purposes of hunting game, gathering food, or utilizing other necessary resources in the forms of trade, intermarriage, and ceremonies. Cultural Surveys CRM Tech prepared two studies for the Project site. The first consisted of Phase I and Phase II cultural assessments conducted in 1998 and 1995 for approximate 50 acres of undeveloped land as part of Tentative Parcel Map No. 29052 and Tentative Tract Map No. 29053, which included a residential development and the current commercial Project site. The study was part of the environmental impact review process for the proposed subdivision and development of the property, as required by the City of La Quinta, Lead Agency for the project, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC §21000, et seq.). The second study was conducted in June 2017 and consisted of a historical/archaeological resources records search, historical background review, and an archaeological field inspection of the approximately 12-acre Project site (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). The Phase I survey in 1998 identified and recorded a total of seven prehistoric - i.e., Native American - archaeological sites, three of which were located within or partially within the current project area (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). All three of these sites represented prehistoric habitation remains featuring surface 267 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 32 scatters of lithic and ceramic artifacts. The presence of these sites, along with the previous discovery of a dense cluster of similar sites in the surrounding area, which lies on the former shoreline of Holocene Lake Cahuilla, prompted the subsequent Phase II archaeological testing and evaluation program. The Phase II study entailed surface collection of all artifacts and excavation of 13 standard hand-dug, one-square-meter archaeological testing units to the depth of one meter at the three sites and within a modified mesquite sand dune near one of the sites. In addition to CRM TECH staff archaeologists, the field crew included three Native Americans affiliated with the nearby Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. A total of 106 artifacts were recovered through surface collection, but the test units indicated “an almost complete absence” of subsurface cultural material. Only three pottery sherds and two flakes of chipped quartz were produced from the 13 excavated units. In light of these findings, none of the three sites was found to meet CEQA criteria for significance (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). The Phase II study concluded that the proposed development of the subject property would not cause a substantial adverse change to any historical resources or important archaeological resources, but recommended archaeological monitoring of earth-moving activities in the area of the modified dune. The artifact collection and catalogue have since been curated at the La Quinta Historical Society. Records Search A standard one-mile-radius records search was conducted on May 17, 2017, by CRM TECH. The records indicated that no further archaeological studies have occurred in the project area since 1998, and no additional sites have been identified on the property. In 2006, the project area was included in a citywide survey focusing on built-environment resources of historical origin, but none was found in or near the project area. Outside the project area but within the one-mile scope, historical records identified that more than 70 previous cultural resources studies have been completed on various tracts of land and linear features, 49 of them since 1998. Collectively, these studies covered roughly 85 percent of the land within the scope of the records, and resulted in the identification of 93 historical/archaeological sites and 21 isolates - i.e., localities with fewer than three artifacts - within the one-mile radius. Nearly all of these sites and isolates were of prehistoric origin, and most were found along or near the ancient shoreline of Lake Cahuilla. None of these sites or isolates was found in the immediate vicinity of the Project area, but their presence certainly supports the high archaeological sensitivity assessment for the project vicinity. Field Inspection On May 15, 2017, CRM TECH archeologist Daniel Ballester, M.S., carried out the field inspection by walking a series of parallel north-south transects spaced 30 meters (approximately 100 feet) apart. Survey Results In 1998, the project area was noted as former agricultural land that had been cleared of its groves, with a rectangular-shaped mound, representing the modified dune, near Avenue 50. The 2017 report noted that the since the 1998 report, the project area has undergone additional disturbance from the installation of underground sewage pipes, as evidenced by several man holes across the property. The mound has been removed, and a 110 foot x 110 foot earthen pad has been created near the center of the property since July 2016 (Google Earth 2016). Furthermore, the ground surface bears evidence of recent mechanical clearing. 268 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 33 No archaeological features or artifacts, either prehistoric or historical, were encountered during the field inspection. The 2017 survey concluded that the original conclusion of the 1998 Phase II study - that the proposed development would have No Impact on any known “historical resources,” as defined by CEQA - remains valid and appropriate for the current Project. Nevertheless, in light of past discoveries in the vicinity, the overall archaeological sensitivity of the project location remains high, and the potential of encountering subsurface prehistoric cultural remains within the project boundaries cannot be overlooked (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). Paleontological Resources The San Bernardino County Museum performed a Paleontology Literature/Records Review on May 2, 2017 for the subject parcel (Appendix D). The report identified that although there were no recorded paleontological resource localities are present within the project area, or within 1 mile of the project, paleontological resources have been identified on sites within approximately 1.5 miles of the proposed Project site. Additionally, the Riverside County’s Paleontological Resource Sensitivity Map (RCPTSM) identifies that the Project site is located on sedimentary rocks that have a high paleontological sensitivity. The City’s General Plan EIR also identifies the Project area as one with High Paleontological Sensitivity (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). Impact Analysis – Cultural Resources a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5? No Impact: Historic resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements, and remnants associated with a significant historic even or person(s) and/or have a historically significant style, design, or achievement. Damaging or demolition of historic resources is typically considered to be a significant impact. Impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or removal, and indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource. Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5. According to the records search conducted for this site, no resources that are considered historically significant exist on site. Therefore, no adverse impacts to historic resources would occur. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Archaeological sites are locations that contain resources associated with former human activities, and may contain such resources as human skeletal remains, waste from tool manufacture, tool concentrations, and/or discoloration or accumulation of soil or food remains. The Phase I and Phase II study results indicated that there would be no impact. However, the survey identified that because there have been past discoveries in the vicinity, the overall archaeological sensitivity of the project location remains high, and the potential of encountering subsurface prehistoric cultural remains within the project boundaries is a potential. 269 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 34 Therefore, adverse impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 will be implemented to address unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed Project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a paleontological resource as defined in 15064.5 since it is located in an area of High Paleontological Sensitivity. It is not anticipated that proposed excavations to support the proposed Project will encounter native material that could impact paleontological resources. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-2 will be implemented to address unanticipated discoveries of paleontological resources. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed Project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Should human remains be found during construction, Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would reduce any potential impacts to a level of less than significant. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. e) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code 21074? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Although the Project site is located in an area that has been home to Native American tribes for centuries, the Project site is not anticipated to contain tribal cultural resources. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and CUL-3 will be implemented to address unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources. Mitigation measures are listed at the end of this section. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): CUL-1: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified archeological monitor. In the event unanticipated archaeological resources are discovered:  The Archaeological monitor shall notify the project foreman  The Archaeological monitor has the authority to temporarily halt work in the area of archaeological discoveries until the resource has been evaluated  All work in the vicinity of the find shall halt  Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until written notification is received from the Project archaeologist 270 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 35 CUL-2: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified paleontological monitor. Paleontological monitors should be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed, to avoid construction delays, and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Monitoring will be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units as described by the San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Sciences May 2, 2017 report are not present, or if present are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. CUL-3: If human remains are encountered during the undertaking, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The local authorities must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measures. 271 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 36 VI. Geology and Soils Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: X  Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.  Strong seismic ground shaking?  Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?  Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Environmental Setting A geotechnical report was prepared for the site in 1998, and updated in 2017 (Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017). The project site is at the northern portion of the Salton Trough physiographic province. The Salton Trough is a geologic structural depression resulting from large scale regional faulting. The trough is bounded on the northeast by the San Andreas Fault and the southwest by faults of the San Jacinto Fault Zone. The Salton Trough represents the northward extension of the Gulf of California with continual in- filling with both marine and non-marine sediments since the Miocene Epoch (Southland Geotechnical, November 5, 1998). 272 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 37 Earthquake Faults A review of the current Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone maps indicate that the nearest mapped Earthquake Fault Zone is the San Andreas-Coachella fault, located approximately 6.1 mile northeast of the project site (Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017). Soils and Liquefaction Liquefaction occurs when a saturated or partially saturated soil substantially loses strength and stiffness in response to an applied stress, usually earthquake shaking or other sudden change in stress condition, causing it to behave like a liquid. Groundwater was encountered at 40 feet deep during exploration efforts in 1998. Groundwater was not encountered in 2017 sampling efforts which consisted of trench excavation to a depth of between 5 and 12 feet. Groundwater is believed to exist at a depth of 70 ft based on water level in nearby water wells in 1978 as reported in USGS Water Resources Report 91-4142 (Southland Geotechnical, November 5, 1998 and Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017). The field exploration conducted from October 29 to November 5, 1998 indicates that the surficial and subsurface soils consist generally medium dense Silty Sand, Sandy Silt, and fine Sand (SM, ML, and SP- SM). Layers of Sandy Silt to Silt (ML) exist at depths greater than 4 feet. The upper surficial soils has varying concentrations of wood branches and roots from the old citrus grove. (Southland Geotechnical, November 5, 1998). Landslides The site and the surroundings are flat, and there are no mountainous or hillside areas adjacent to the site. Wind Erosion Much of the Valley are in La Quinta is susceptible to wind and wind-blown sand hazards. This means that soils may be loosened and transported during grading and construction activities. According to the City of La Quinta’s General Plan, the project site’s Wind Erodibility Rating is “High.” Impact Analysis – Geology and Soils a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: • Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. • Strong seismic ground shaking? • Seismic related ground failure, including liquefaction? • Landslides? Less Than Significant. The Project site lies within a seismically active region of Southern California. According to Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone maps, the Project site is not located in an Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zone nor is the Project site or its immediate vicinity situated above any active faults. To minimize potential damage to the proposed access road and rock placement caused by groundshaking, 273 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 38 all construction would comply with the latest Uniform Building Code and any applicable criteria set forth by the City, and would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving the rupture of known earthquake faults. Impacts associated with the rupture of a known earthquake fault are considered less than significant. Liquefaction occurs primarily in saturated, loose, fine to medium-grained soils in areas where the ground water table is 50 feet or less below the ground surface. When these sediments are shaken, such as during an earthquake, a sudden increase in pore water pressure causes the soils to lose strength and behave as a liquid. The resulting features are called sand boils, sand blows or "sand volcanoes." Liquefaction-related effects include loss of bearing strength, ground oscillations and lateral spreading. According to the analysis conducted for the 1998 and 2002 Fairway Specific Plan approvals, the proposed project occur in a Zone Ill groundshaking zone, approximately one quarter mile east of an inferred and inactive fault. The project site can expect to experience significant groundshaking in the event of a major earthquake in the Coachella Valley. In order to mitigate the potential impacts of groundshaking on buildings throughout the City, the Building Department has implemented the Uniform Building Code, as amended, which requires reinforced construction in groundshaking zones. The Project site does not occur in an area prone to liquefaction, and its distance from an active fault makes ground rupture unlikely (Landmark, August 25, 2017). The Project will be required to meet the City’s Building standards, thereby reducing the potential impact from groundshaking hazards to a less than significant level (Warner Engineering, February 19, 2002). b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Minor soil erosion may occur during the grading and construction period of the new buildings. The project site occurs within the City's blowsand hazard area where soils at the Project site have a high potential for wind erosion. Implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2 will reduce the impacts to less than significant. Mitigation measures are listed at the end of this section. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant. Unstable soils that can result in a landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse generally occurs in when shallow groundwater liquefies soil especially during a seismic event. The Project site is generally flat and fully graded. The geotechnical reports prepared for the Project identify that liquefaction is unlikely due to groundwater being greater than 50 feet (Landmark, August 25, 2017). Therefore, the risk of soil instability is low. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant. Expansive soil is typically clay or a soil type that is prone to large volume changes (swelling and shrinking) that are directly related to changes in water content. The geotechnical report indicates that the surficial and subsurface soils consist generally medium dense Silty Sand, Sandy Silt, and fine Sand (SM, ML, and SP-SM). Layers of Sandy Silt to Silt (ML) exist at depths greater than 4 feet. The upper surficial soils had varying concentrations of wood branches and roots from the old citrus grove. 274 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 39 In arid climatic regions, granular soils have a potential to collapse upon wetting. Collapse potential tests performed in 1998 indicate a potential of 3.1 and 1.6 percent collapse upon inundation and are considered a moderate site risk. The Project will be constructed using the latest engineering and construction practices which include developing the building foundations in a manner that includes overexcavation and recompaction of the zone beneath the building pads to mitigate for the potential of hydroconsolidation caused by soil saturation from landscape irrigation or broken utility lines by overexcavation and recompaction of the zone beneath building pads. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The Project does not include the use of septic systems. Thus, no impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): GEO-1 Prior to grading plan approval, submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, a PMl0 management plan. GEO-2 For portions of the site not immediately under construction, ensure the stabilization of soils through the use of soil cement or re-vegetation, frequent watering. including watering during the evening and weekends during significant wind events; street sweeping or washing during construction, and the chemical stabilization of unpaved construction roadways. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measures. 275 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 40 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Background Lundin Development is proposing a 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center project on approximately 12 acres. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved a 100,460 square-foot mixed-use commercial center Specific Plan for the 12-acre Project Site. The approval of the Specific Plan included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The City also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR on February 19, 2013. Therefore, the analysis herein is based on the net increase of approximately 25,340 square-feet of new uses not previously reviewed or approved in the 1999 Specific Plan and subsequent 2012 Updated General Plan. CEQA and Greenhouse Gases According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4, when making a determination of the significance of greenhouse gas emissions, the “lead agency shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to (1) use a model or methodology to quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project, and which model or methodology to use.” In addition, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(c) provides that “a lead agency may consider thresholds of significance previously adopted or recommended by other public agencies or recommended by experts” on the condition that “the decision of the lead agency to adopt such thresholds is supported by substantial evidence.” The Proposed Project is located within the City of La Quinta. The City of La Quinta adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (Plan) on February 13th, 2013. The Plan provides reduction strategies and reduction measures that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions at their source and at the end use by improving operating efficiency, increasing reliance on renewable source for energy production, developing new technologies, and through conservation. These reduction measures are listed in Table 28 of the Plan and can be implemented as needed during the design phase. However, the City does not have their own thresholds of significance for greenhouse gas emissions. The City finds persuasive and reasonable the approach to determining significance of greenhouse gas emissions established by SCAQMD. Impact Analysis a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? 276 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 41 Less Than Significant. The Proposed Project is located within the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation of the Specific Plan/General Plan. The proposed mixed-use commercial uses are allowed within the CC land use area which have been reviewed and approved within the 2012 General Plan update. The project was previously reviewed and approved as the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center, Project 2002-06. Subsequently, a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality and Greenhouse Gas impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR on February 19, 2013 was adopted. Approval of the proposed revision would not require a zone change nor a General Plan Amendment. Therefore, the delta was reviewed. Emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod version 2016.3.1 (Appendix B). The analysis prepared for the Proposed Project assumed the construction of an additional 25,340 square-feet of mixed-use commercial uses on the 12-acre Project Site. Construction was anticipated to begin approximately early- 2018 and be completed in late-2018. Other parameters which were used to estimate construction emissions such as the worker and vendor trips and trip lengths were based on the CalEEMod defaults. The TIA determined that the Proposed Project would generate approximately 13,328 daily trips. Trips were broken down by land use type and land use size. The TIA also included a 20-percent reduction in traffic to account for pass-by-credit. As the Proposed Project is evaluated as the Specific Plan delta of 25,340 square-feet of new uses (approximately 20 percent greater than was approved in the Specific Plan), 4,513 daily trips (approximately 34 percent of the development based on more intense uses) were modeled to represent a worst-case scenario. Additionally, the site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The proposed Project represents approximately 0.22 FAR. Therefore, because the Project proposes to use less than the maximum allowed under the zoning, a less than significant impact is anticipated. Many gases make up the group of pollutants that are believed to contribute to global climate change. However, three gases are currently evaluated and represent the highest concentration of GHG: Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), and Nitrous oxide (N2O). SCAQMD provides guidance methods and/or Emission Factors that are used for evaluating a project’s emissions in relation to the thresholds. A threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year has been adopted by SCAQMD for non-industrial type projects as potentially significant or global warming (Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, SCAQMD, October 2008). The modeled emissions anticipated from the Proposed Project compared to the SCAQMD thresholds are shown below in Table 7 and Table 8. Table 7 Greenhouse Gas Construction Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) Source/Phase CO2 CH4 N20 Site Preparation 0.5 0.0 0.0 Grading 1.1 0.0 0.0 Building Construction 45 0.0 0.0 Paving 2.5 0.0 0.0 Architectural Coating 1.3 0.0 0.0 Total MTCO2e 47.3 SCAQMD Threshold 3,000 Significant NO Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Annual Emissions. 277 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 42 Table 8 Greenhouse Gas Operational Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) Source/Phase CO2 CH4 N20 Area 0.0 0.0 0.0 Energy 373.9 0.0 0.0 Mobile 2,045.3 0.3 0.0 Waste 23.7 1.4 0.0 Water 20.1 0.1 0.0 MTCO2e 2,510.5 SCAQMD Threshold 3,000 Significant NO Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Annual Emissions. As shown in Table 7 and Table 8, the Proposed Project’s emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s 3,000 MTCO2e threshold of significance and therefore would have less than significant impact for greenhouse gas emissions; no mitigation measures are required. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant. There are no existing GHG plans, policies, or regulations that have been adopted by CARB or SCAQMD that would apply to this type of emissions source. However, the operator shall comply with CARB and SCAQMD regulations related to diesel-fueled trucks, which may include among others: (1) meeting more stringent emission standards; (2) retrofitting existing engines with particulate traps; (3) use of low sulfur fuel; and (4) use of alternative fuels or equipment. It is possible that CARB may develop performance standards for Project-related activities prior to construction of the Proposed Project. In this event, these performance standards would be implemented and adhered to, and there would be no conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation. The City of La Quinta adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (Plan) on February 13th, 2013. The Plan provides reduction strategies and reduction measures that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions at their source and at the end use by improving operating efficiency, increasing reliance on renewable sources for energy production, developing new technologies, and through conservation. During the development review process the City would implement as feasible necessary development upgrades to further reduce GHG footprint. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. The Proposed Project is consistent with CARB scoping measures and therefore does not conflict with local or regional greenhouse gas plans. Additionally, the City of La Quinta requires all new development to comply with the California Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards which are designed to ensure new and existing buildings achieve energy efficiency and preserve outdoor and indoor environmental quality. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): 278 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 43 No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 279 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 44 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Environmental Setting The Project site has historically been vacant. The general area surrounding the Project site consists of residential and commercial uses. Impact Analysis a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 280 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 45 Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Hazardous substances and wastes would be used during construction of the new building. These would include fuels for machinery and vehicles, new and used motor oils, and storage containers and applicators containing such materials. The potential exists for localized spills of petroleum-based products or other chemicals during construction. These spills could expose construction workers and the public to hazardous materials either directly, at the site of the spill, or indirectly, by introducing these substances into stormwater runoff. All development requiring ground disturbance would be subject to regional and local regulations, including the need for an SWPPP under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES No. CAR000002). In addition, the City requires a grading permit for all developments that would require grading. Compliance with SWRCB‘s General Construction Activity Stormwater Permit regulations requiring a SWPPP, and the grading permit required by the City would ensure hazardous materials generated during construction would not create a significant impact. Additionally, construction is anticipated be temporary, therefore any potential impacts would have a limited and temporary timeframe to occur. Potential impacts would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. The site plan also proposes a convenience fuel station which will receive routine fuel deliveries as needed. The station would be regulated and permitted by all federal and state regulations. Therefore, the regulatory permits, coupled with the implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2, will reduce the impacts to less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Additionally, as discussed in Response VII(a), a variety of hazardous substances would be used and stored during construction of the proposed Project. Accidental spills, leaks, fires, or explosions involving hazardous materials represent a potential threat to human health and the environment if not properly addressed. As proposed in Mitigation Measure HAZ- 1, a hazardous substance spill prevention plan shall be prepared and implemented, and hazardous materials spill kits shall be maintained on site for small spills. The implementation of BMPs, such as having spill kits available on equipment, would minimize the potential effect of such occurrences. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would reduce impacts to less than significant with implementation of mitigation. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. There is no existing or proposed school within one-quarter mile of the Project site. There- fore, there is no impact. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. The proposed Project is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites, and as a result would not create a significant hazard to the public or environment and there would be no impact. 281 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 46 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. There are several airports in the vicinity, but none are located within two miles of the Project site. These airports include: the Bermuda Dunes Airport, located south of Interstate and West of Jefferson Street in Bermuda Dunes, and the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, a public airport located east of Harrison Street and between Airport Boulevard on the north and Avenue 60 on the south. The Bermuda Dunes Airport is approximately 4 miles north of the Project site, and the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is located approximately 7 miles southeasterly of the Project site. Therefore, there is no impact. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. There are no private airstrips in vicinity the Project area. Therefore, there is no impact. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The project site is currently vacant, and does not include facilities for emergency response. Additionally, no part of the Project design would impede or redirect emergency response within the area. The site provides for ingress and egress that can be used for emergency response to the various businesses proposed. Therefore, there is no impact. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. The Project site is located in an area that consists of vacant land and retail uses in a desert setting, and not located adjacent to an area susceptible to wildland fires. Therefore, there is no impact. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): HAZ – 1 A hazardous spill prevention plan shall be prepared by the Applicant and submitted to the City for approval to minimize the likelihood of a spill shall be prepared prior to construction. The plan shall state the actions that would be required if a spill occurs to prevent contamination of surface waters and provide for cleanup of the spill. The plan shall follow Federal, state, and local safety guidelines and standards to avoid increased exposure to these pollutants. HAZ – 2 If a contaminated area is encountered during construction, construction shall cease in the vicinity of the contaminated area. The construction contractor shall notify all appropriate authorities, including the EPA and the City. If necessary, the contaminated site shall be remediated to minimize the potential for exposure of the public and to allow the Project to be safety constructed. 282 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 47 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply IX. Hydrology and Water Quality: Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite? X d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding onsite or offsite? X e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Environmental Setting Although the climate in the Coachella Valley and the Planning Area are generally temperate, seasonal storms can produce significant amounts of precipitation within short periods of time. Winter storms are 283 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 48 responsible for much of the area’s annual rainfall, and usually occur between November and April. However, the region and surrounding mountains may also experience localized thunderstorms at other times, especially during the summer monsoon season. Rapid snowmelt from the mountains may also result in flooding downslope (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). Areas within the City of La Quinta are subject to flash flooding along natural or man-made channels and sheet flooding across the valley floor. Although of short duration, flash floods result in high peak water volumes and velocities, which are frequently intensified by features of the local natural and built environment (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). There are no dams in the Project vicinity, and the Whitewater Rivers is located nearly 10 miles to the east of the Project site. The Project site not considered at risk from inundation from dam failure or flooding hazard from levee damage or failure along the Whitewater River or from above-ground water storage tanks at higher elevations within and adjacent to La Quinta (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). Impact Analysis a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant. All development requiring ground disturbance would be subject to regional and local regulations, including the need for an SWPPP under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order No. 2009-0009- DWQ, NPDES No. CAR000002). In addition, the City requires a grading permit for all developments that would require grading. Compliance with SWRCB‘s General Construction Activity Stormwater Permit regulations requiring a SWPPP, and the grading permit required by the City would ensure water quality standards are not exceeded. Additionally, Mitigation Measure HYD-1 will require the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and subject to approval by RWQCB. The Project will create an impermeable surface over much of the entire site when complete. This can increase the potential for pollutants to occur in surface water primarily be from cars parked in the parking lot leaking fluids. However, the project includes an underground system to collect all of the stormwater runoff from the project site. The WQMP prepared for the site as part of Mitigation Measure HYD-1 will also address the requirements and operations of the underground system. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact on water quality. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less Than Significant. During construction, the project will employ various measures for dust control including the use of water that is readily available from the Coachella Valley Water District. The water used during construction will be temporary, and water will not be the sole method used for dust control. Water-conscious measures will be used as part of the final design, including installation of water-efficient features such as water-efficient toilets and drought-tolerant landscaping. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite? 284 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 49 Less Than Significant. The Project site has been previously graded and is on level ground completely surrounded by urban development, vacant land, and paved streets. Further, there are no streams or rivers on the Project site or its adjacent vicinity. The construction phase of the Project would involve standard best management practices (BMP’s) associated with commercial development, such as drainage to city sewers in the parking lots, curbs, and landscaping to allow water percolation during rain events. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding onsite or offsite? Less Than Significant. Refer to Response IX(c), above. The Project site is surrounded by residential and retail uses, and is not located directly adjacent to any stream or river. An underground stormwater collection system will be installed as part of the project to capture all of the stormwater runoff from the site. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant. The project includes the construction of an underground stormwater system to handle all of the stormwater from the site, and little to no water is anticipated to be collected by the City’s stormwater drainage systems. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less Than Significant. As previously discussed, the proposed Project proposes to construct a project that will utilize an underground stormwater collection system. Uses for some of the buildings include a gas station. The gas station would be constructed to the latest standards and required to comply with State and federal requirements for this use. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The Project does not propose to construct housing. As a result, construction and operation of the Project would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Map or Federal Flood Insurance Map. Therefore, no impacts would occur under this criterion as a result of the Project. h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant. The City’s General Plan identifies that the Project site is within FEMA Flood Hazard Zone D which is an area of undetermined risk. Therefore, the development of the proposed Project would not place structures within a 100 year flood area and would not impede or result in the redirection of flood flows in the City. A less than significant impact would occur. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less Than Significant. The Whitewater River is located nearly 10 miles east of the site, and the Project site is not located in proximity to a levee or dam. Therefore, there is no impact from flooding that could occur as a result of a dam failure or levee breech. However, the Coachella Valley is subject to thunderstorms that can create flash flooding. The new buildings would be required to adhere to current 285 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 50 California Building Code regulations for commercial development. Additionally, the project includes an underground system to collect all of the stormwater runoff from the project site. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. There are no bodies of water in the vicinity of the Project site that are capable of producing seiche activity. There is also no potential for tsunamis in the Project area as the Pacific Ocean is more than 150 miles to the southwest of the Project area. As discussed above, the City’s General Plan has not identified the Project site as being in an area susceptible to mudflows as the topography of the site is generally flat and a sufficient distance from hills and mountains to ensure that mudflows in this area would not occur. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): HYD-1 Prior to Project approval, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that shall, at minimum, include the following:  Identifies all project related pollutants, impacts to the site’s hydrologic condition, and potential impacts to local waterways caused by Project post-construction runoff;  Identifies BMPs required to remove pollutants from the Projects’ post construction runoff and prevent downstream hydromodification;  Identifies parties responsible for long term operation and maintenance activities of all BMPs  Identifies the design, operation and maintenance of the underground stormwater collection system. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 286 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 51 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply X. Land Use and Planning: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Environmental Setting The site is located on a vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 2, and Figure 3). The site is bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by a retention basin with residential development west of the basin, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan of Land Use and associated parcel map to allow for the development of 100,460 square feet of a supermarket- anchored shopping center with adjacent retail pads on 12.5 acres at the corner of Jefferson Street 50th Avenue. The parcel is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The Specific Plan adoption included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. In 2002, an amendment to the Specific Plan was also adopted. To date, that project has not been constructed. On February 19. 2013, the City of La Quinta adopted the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its 2035 General Plan (SCH# 2010111094) which included the impacts of adding to commercial uses within the City, including the approved Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was also adopted with the General Plan EIR for environmental impacts that could not be mitigated to a level below significance for: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic (Resolution 2013- 009). Currently, the Lundin Development is requesting authorization from the City to construct 125,800 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center and adjacent retail pads on the 12.5-acre site at the corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue, within the same area of the previously-approved Specific Plan. Proposed uses within the commercial center development are similar to the previously approved plan, and include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store. 287 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 52 Impact Analysis a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The Project proposes to develop a shopping center on a contiguous vacant 12.5-acre parcel as a retail center. Retail uses exist across Jefferson Street on the east. There are no surrounding land uses that would currently conflict with the proposed use. Therefore, there is no impact. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant. The site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) by the City of La Quinta. The subject property has received prior approvals as a commercial center in 1998 and in 2002. The project is proposed to be developed as a commercial center in accordance with the municipal code standards of the Community Commercial zone. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Less Than Significant. The City of La Quinta falls entirely within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) area. The site is a vacant dirt parcel that has been previously disturbed. The subject parcel is not located within or adjacent to a Conservation Area. The CVMSHCP requires a habitat assessment for the burrowing owl (BUOW). If habitat for the BUOW is present, a focused survey is required. The Biological Resource Assessment prepared for the project (Jericho, May 23, 2017) determined that there was no suitable BUOW habitat, nor were there signs of BUOW activity. No suitable BUOW habitat was identified on site during the burrowing owl habitat assessment survey. Therefore, no additional protocol-level focused surveys will be required. No other listed or sensitive species or sensitive habitat was observed on the site. The subject parcel does not contain suitable habitat for any of the sensitive species that have been documented in the project vicinity. The Project must also comply with local conservation regulations which require payment of a mitigation fee at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, implementation of the Project will not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 288 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 53 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XI. Mineral Resources: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Environmental Setting The Project site is currently vacant, and no mineral mining occurs onsite or in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. The City of La Quinta General Plan (City of La Quinta, February 19, 2013) identifies the Project site as mapped within Mineral Resource Zone – 1, defined as areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood for their presence exists. Impact Analysis a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The Project site is currently vacant and is zoned Community Commercial (CC) by the City of La Quinta. No mineral resources are known to occur onsite nor is the Project site zoned for mining uses. No impact would occur. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. Refer to Response XI a), above. No impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 289 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 54 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XII. Noise: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Environmental Setting Noise – General Sound is a physical disturbance in a medium, such as air, that is capable of being detected by the human ear. Sound waves in air are caused by variations in pressure above and below the static value of atmospheric pressure. Sound is measured in units of decibels (dB) on a logarithmic scale. The “pitch” (high or low) of the sound is a description of frequency, which is measured in Hertz (Hz). Most common environmental sounds are a composite of frequencies. A normal human ear can usually detect sounds within frequencies from 20 to 20,000 Hz. However, humans are most sensitive to frequencies in the range of 500 to 4,000 Hz. Certain frequencies are given more “weight” during assessment because human hearing is not equally sensitive to all frequencies of sound. The A-weighted decibel (dBA) scale corresponds to the sensitivity range for human hearing. Noise levels capable of being heard by humans are measured in dBA. A noise level change of 3 dBA or less is barely perceptible to average human hearing. However, a 5 dBA change in noise level is clearly noticeable. A 10 dBA change is perceived as a doubling or halving of noise loudness, while a 20 dBA change is considered a “dramatic change” in loudness. Sound from a source spreads out as it travels away from the source, and the sound pressure level diminishes with distance. Individual sound sources are considered “point sources” when the distance from 290 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 55 the source is large compared to the size of the source (e.g., construction equipment, and turbines). Sound from a point source radiates hemispherically, which yields a 6 dB sound level reduction for each doubling of the distance from the source. If the sound source is long in one dimension, the source is considered a “line source,” (i.e., roadways and railroads). Sound from a line source radiates cylindrically, which typically yields a 3 dB sound level reduction for each doubling of the distance from the source. The metrics for evaluating the community noise environment are based on measurements of the noise levels over a period of time. These metrics are used in order to characterize and evaluate the cumulative noise impacts. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) represents a 24-hour A-weighted sound level average from midnight to midnight, where sound levels during the evening hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. have an added 5 dB weighting, and nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. have an added 10 dB weighting. Potential noise from construction equipment to be used for this project are included on Table 9. Table 9 Construction Equipment Noise Emission Levels Equipment Typical Noise Level (dBA) 50 ft from Source* Backhoe 80 Compactor 82 Concrete Mixer 85 Concrete Pump 82 Dozer 85 Grader 85 Loader 85 Scarifier 83 Scraper 89 Truck 88 FTA, May 2006 *Data taken from EPA Report - EPA 550/9-76-004 Vibration – General Sources of vibration included geotech drill rigs, excavators, dump trucks, backhoes, and other general construction equipment. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has developed vibration impact thresholds for noise-sensitive buildings, residences, and institutional land uses. These are usually measured as “vibration decibels” or VdB. According to the FTA guidelines, a vibration level of 65 VdB is the threshold of perceptibility for humans. These thresholds are typically 80 VdB at residences and buildings where people normally sleep (e.g., nearby residences and daycare facilities) and 83 VdB at institutional buildings (e.g., schools and churches). The FTA guidelines also state that, for a significant impact to occur, vibration levels must exceed 80 VdB during infrequent events (FTA, May 2006). 291 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 56 Typical vibration levels from project equipment are based on the FTA guidelines provided in Table 10. Table 10 Vibration Source Levels for Typical Construction Equipment Equipment Vibration Level at 25 feet (VdB) Large bulldozer 87 Caisson drilling 87 Loaded trucks 86 Jackhammer 79 Small bulldozer 58 Source: FTA 2006 Project Location The site is immediately adjacent to a stormwater detention basin along the northern and western edges, with residences abutting the detention basin’s west and north sides. The basin provides for an approximately 50- to 120-foot buffer between the Project and the residence backyard. Three residences on the southwest area of the project site directly abut the project site. Residences exist to the south of the Project site, just beyond 50th Avenue. Commercial uses exist to the east of the project, just beyond the site’s border with Jefferson Street. Local Noise Ordinances The residential areas to the north and west and south of the Project are zoned Low Density Residential. The City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.100.210 “Noise control,” identifies this land use as “noise sensitive.” The City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 6.08.050 “Disturbances by construction noises” limit construction noise impacts, predominantly through restriction of times and days when work may be carried out: Construction is not permitted on Sundays or defined Holidays Construction is restricted to 8am to 5pm on Saturdays Between October 1st and April 30th, construction is restricted 7am to 5:30pm Between May 1st and September 30th, construction is restricted to 6am to 7pm. The City’s code also identifies limits for operational noise for the residential and non-residential land uses. Operational noise shall not exceed the levels set out in the Noise Standard, or the existing ambient noise. For the “noise sensitive” properties to the South, West and North, operational noise from the project shall not exceed: 65 dB(A) between 7am and 10pm 50 dB(A) between 10pm and 7am For the “other non-residential” land uses to the East operational noise from the project shall not exceed: 75 dB(A) between 7am and 10pm 292 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 57 65 dB(A) between 10pm and 7am Project Noise Studies Noise studies for the Project were prepared in 2002 as part of the Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 approval and in 2017 and 2018 to serve as an update (Appendix E). The 2002 study identified that both Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue were impacted, and exceed 60 dBA CNEL. The study identified that all new development is required to mitigate to the City's standards for noise, as required in the General Plan (Table EH-1) (Warner Engineering, February 19, 2002). The 2017 noise study also concluded that areas along Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue were impacted and exceeded the 60dBA criteria. Ambient noise measured along various locations along the north and west perimeter of the site, nearest to the residences, measured between 53.9 and 60 dBA. The study determined that the main sources of noise across the site are noise from road traffic on 50th Avenue and Jefferson street, other noise sources included HVAC systems serving the houses to the north, west and south of the site and from HVAC serving the commercial buildings to the east, across Jefferson Street. There was also minor noise from distant aircraft and birdsong (Antonio Acoustics, June 16, 2017, Appendix E). Noise is also anticipated from the speakers of the drive-through eating establishments, as well as vehicle doors closing in the parking lot. The Project is proposed approximately 150 feet between the closest development building and the residences to the south. The residences to the south already have a concrete masonry boundary wall. Impact Analysis a)Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant. The noise study (Appendix D) identified that the noise from the site through the day would not exceed the measured levels at the edges of the site closest to the residences, and that the noise from the HVAC units on the buildings and parking does not exceed the City of La Quinta daytime noise criteria of 60dB(A) at any residence. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact. b)Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant. The noise related to construction would include those generated from the use of heavy equipment at the site or vehicles transporting materials. Activities that could generate groundborne vibration include pile-driving and demolition; however, pile-driving and significant demolition is not anticipated to be utilized during construction. Some construction activities would occur within approximately 30 to 75 feet of residences, with residences to the southwest being the closest receptors. Screening-level calculations based on the FTA Guidelines (Table 10) indicate that vibration levels associated with these activities would have attenuated to a level of approximately 78 VdB at the nearest residence given the intervening distance. This analysis shows that vibration levels at all identified sensitive receptors were below the threshold of 80 VdB. 293 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 58 Construction activities would be temporary and would not expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels due to the adherence of the City’s General Plan. Therefore, groundborne vibration impacts associated with proposed construction activities will be less than significant. c)A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The 2017 noise study and 2018 amendment measured ambient noise levels along various locations of the Project site perimeter, and projected the potential future noise levels (Table 11). The studies identified a variety of potential operations noise sources that will contribute to a permanent increase in ambient noise: HVAC systems serving the buildings Commercial loading and unloading Noise from parking and the gas station Noise from speakers at the drive-through eating establishments Noise from car doors closing at night To project the potential increase in ambient noise, the 2017 noise study assumed that the HVAC for each new building would not exceed a sound power level of 100dB(A), (equivalent to 68 dB(A) at 50 feet). In the absence of a national standard for the US, the parking lot methodology was based on ISO 9603-2 1996 (Antonio Acoustics, June 16, 2017, Appendix E). Table 11 Existing and Projected Future Operational Noise Location Measurement Location and Distance from Sensitive Receptors Measured level, dB(A) New noise from HVAC and parking, dB(A) New noise exceeds measured? 1 Southwestern site perimeter, close to Avenue 50, between proposed parking and residences 64.2 52 No 2 Adjacent to boundary wall, southwestern site perimeter, approximately 200 feet north of Location 1, between proposed parking and residences 55.9 53.1 No 3 Adjacent to boundary wall, western site perimeter, approximately 90 feet between proposed back of proposed Pavilions grocery store and residences 53.9 50.4 No 4 Adjacent to boundary wall, western site perimeter, approximately 200 feet between proposed loading dock for proposed Pavilions grocery store and residences 60.0 54.5 No 5 Adjacent to boundary wall, western site perimeter, approximately 200 feet between proposed loading dock for Pavilions grocery store and residences 55.6 55.4 No 6 Adjacent to boundary wall, western site perimeter, approximately 150 feet between proposed parking and residences 58.3 54.3 No 7 Northeast perimeter corner, adjacent to Jefferson Street, not near residences 68.2 52.3 No 8 East site perimeter, adjacent to Jefferson Street 68 Not Estimated No 9 Southeast site perimeter, adjacent to Jefferson Street and 65.1 Not Estimated No 294 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 59 Avenue 50, not near residences The noise studies prepared in 2002, 2017, and 2018 indicated that the ambient noise will not exceed the City’s standard. However, because the ambient noise is already close to the City’s maximum level for the area, the Project operations will include Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through NOI-5 be implemented to ensure that ambient noise levels will not exceed the City’s maximum standard. Mitigation Measures are located at the end of this section. Additionally, the noise study identified that additional screening would be appropriate to accommodate the noise from the speaker at the drive-through eating establishment and the residences along the south. Mitigation Measure NOI-6 will be implemented to reduce noise from the speakers at the drive-through, which will ensure impacts are less than significant. Mitigation measures are located at the end of this section. The 2018 noise study regarding vehicle doors closing also identified that for the closest parking space to 1 meter from the windows of the closest house, the LAMax,F noise level is 60dB for car door slams. This is the worst case scenario and noise from the majority of the parking spaces will be substantially less than this. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact from car doors closing the in the parking lot. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. While the exact construction method and equipment has yet to be determined, noise from construction is expected to occasionally reach 85 dB(A) at 50 feet from the louder noise sources. The timing of construction work is limited to the City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 6.08.050 “Disturbances by construction noises.” However, to reduce construction noise to less than significant levels, Mitigation Measures NOI-7 and NOI-8 are required. Mitigation measures are located at the end of this section. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no airport land use plans within the project area. Therefore, there is no impact. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no private airstrips in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, no impact would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006:  All construction activity shall be limited to the hours of construction permitted by Municipal Code Section 6.08.050.  All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 295 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 60  All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units.  All on-site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m.  The proposed perimeter wall shall be 8 feet in height. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows:  Position devices away from the site boundary to the south.  Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device;  Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs;  Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle;  The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet;  There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example:  Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools  Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises  Turn off idling equipment and vehicles  All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers 296 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 61  All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units  Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment  Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum  Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use  Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications  All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measures. 297 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 62 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XIII. Population and Housing: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is one of nine cities in the Coachella Valley, and offers numerous destination resorts. The population was 37,467 at the 2010 census, up from 23,694 at the 2000 census. Impact Analysis a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant. The Project includes the construction of an approximate 12.5-acre vacant lot for the operation of a retail center designed to serve the existing population. Therefore, the Project will not indirectly induce an increase in population; the impact will be less than significant. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. There are no existing houses on the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project will not displace any housing, or require the construction of replacement housing. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. There are no homeless camps on the Project site, therefore, there is no impact. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. 298 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 63 Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 299 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 64 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XIV. Public Services: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Recreation/Parks? X e) Other public facilities? X Environmental Setting The City contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department for fire protection services, with a total of six stations located throughout the City, all staffed by full time, paid firefighters and volunteers (Terra Nova, July 2012). Police services are contracted through the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department which provides two Police Department offices in the City, and a jail facility in Thermal (Terra Nova, July 2012). The Project site is within the Desert Sands Unified School District boundaries. The DSUSD serves students located west of Jefferson Street and north of Avenue 48. The Harry S Truman Elementary School and the La Quinta Middle School are located on Avenue 50, approximately one mile west of the Project site. The City of La Quinta Community Services Department maintains numerous small pocket parks, neighborhood parks, community parks, and trails throughout incorporated portions of the City. Pocket parks are generally less than one acre, and provide small playgrounds, tot lots, and passive seating areas. These small parks tend to be built within neighborhoods and serve local residents. One of the largest parks within the City of La Quinta is the Lake Cahuilla County Park operated by the County of Riverside. Lake Cahuilla is an 845-acre park located in the southwestern portion of incorporated La Quinta. The Desert Recreation District owns and operates the La Quinta Community Park in La Quinta, which is a 6.5-acre park that includes a 5,000 square foot community center, baseball diamonds, basketball courts, a playground and picnic pavilion (Terra Nova, July 2012). Impact Analysis Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 300 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 65 a) Fire protection? Less Than Significant. As previously discussed, the Project site is served by the City of La Quinta Fire Department. The nearest fire station to the Project site is located approximately 2.3miles southwest of the site at 78111 Avenue 52. The proposed project will be developed in compliance with applicable provisions of the City’s Municipal Codes and all applicable provisions of the adopted and applicable Building, Construction and Fire Codes. Additionally, the fire department will review all plans submitted to the City and the applicant is required to comply with all development requirements recommended by the Fire Department. Additionally, the applicant is required to pay impact fees to assist the fire department in offsetting potential impacts. Given the Project’s compliance with development requirements, impacts to fire services are anticipated to be minimal. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. b) Police Protection? Less Than Significant. As previously discussed, the Project site is served by the City of La Quinta’s police services. The assigned police station for the Project site is located at 86625 Airport Blvd., Thermal, approximately 6 miles to the southeast. However, La Quinta police and Riverside County Sheriff’s routinely patrol the Project vicinity given the urban nature of the area. Response times to the Project site will vary, depending on the nature of the call. The Project provides for state-of-art security provisions in areas such as outdoor lighting and adequate ingress and egress for emergency vehicles. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. c) Schools? No Impact. The Project is commercial in nature and does not propose uses that would directly or indirectly induce population growth, and thus would not generate demand for additional schools. No impact would occur. d) Recreation/Parks? No Impact. The Project does not propose uses that would directly or indirectly induce population growth, and thus would not generate demand for additional parks. Therefore, there is no impact. e) Other Services? No Impact. The Project does not propose uses that would directly or indirectly induce population growth, and thus would not generate demand for other public facilities. Additionally, the applicant is required to pay an impact fee that will assist the City in funding maintenance of city infrastructure. Therefore, there is no impact to this criterion. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no mitigation measures are required. 301 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 66 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XV. Recreation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Environmental Setting The Project is to construct an approximate 12.5-acre vacant lot for a retail center. The Project site is not currently utilized for recreation purposes, nor will the use induce growth that would require the construction of additional recreational facilities. Impact Analysis a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The Project does not include uses that would directly or indirectly induce population growth, therefore, an increase in the use of existing recreational facilities in the City is not anticipated. Therefore, there is no impact. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The Project site is not currently used for recreational purposes and does not propose development that would increase existing recreational uses. Therefore, there is no impact. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 302 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 67 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XVI. Transportation/Traffic: Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? X b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Environmental Setting The proposed Project is located in the City of La Quinta, bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive (a private street owned by the Renaissance Homeowners Association) and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by a retention basin followed by residential development, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. Regional access to the site can be accommodated via Interstate 10 and Hwy 111. A traffic study was performed in July 2017 to evaluate the traffic ingress and egress proposed for Jefferson Street (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix F). Access for the development project is proposed via four driveways: three limited-access (no left-turns out) driveways and one full- access unsignalized driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 400 feet from the Jefferson Street signalized intersection. It should be noted that the one driveway into the shopping center from Derek Alan Drive, as previously identified on the previously-approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, has been removed with this current 303 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 68 proposed Project. The previously-approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan had included a driveway from Derek Alan Drive to the shopping center as a convenience to the residents in the residential development to the north and west. However, due to resident concerns regarding unwanted traffic in the neighborhood after the residential development was constructed, the driveway access from Derek Alan Drive has been eliminated from the “Pavilion Palms” project as amended. At the project location, Jefferson Street is a six-lane, two-way arterial roadway with a raised median and serves as one of the main thoroughfares in the area. Avenue 50 is a two-way roadway with one westbound lane and two eastbound lanes. At the intersection, each approach has one dedicated left-turn lane and one dedicated right-turn lane, except the southbound approach, which has two left-turn lanes. The City of La Quinta has published Engineering Bulletin 06-13 (Appendix G) which applies to site access and gives criteria and methodologies for completing traffic studies. Regarding site access, it states the following: SITE ACCESS Auxiliary lanes shall be installed on all primary arterial, secondary arterial and higher order street classifications according to the following criteria: A left-turn deceleration lane with taper and storage length is required for any driveway with a projected peak hour left ingress turning volume estimated to be 25 vehicles per hour (vph) or greater. The taper length shall be included as part of the required deceleration lane length. A right-turn deceleration lane is required for any driveway with a projected peak hour right ingress turning volume estimated to be 50 vph or greater. The taper length shall be included as part of the required deceleration lane length. Pocket storage length requirements shall be based on individual project characteristics. A right-turn deceleration lane should be considered for lower turning volumes on high volume streets (e.g. Washington Avenue, Highway 111). A left-turn deceleration lane should be considered for locations where left turning vehicles would be required to queue in a high speed (> 40mph) through lane. Installation recommendations for deceleration lanes and related intersection turning movement distributions shown in the final traffic study report will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. The Project includes the following traffic control features:  One additional westbound through lane on Avenue 50 along the project frontage, continuing east of the signalized intersection.  Extend the eastbound dedicated storage lane on Avenue 50 at the signalized intersection to the proposed full-access driveway (the easternmost driveway on Avenue 50) an additional 110 feet for a total storage of 360 feet.  Install a right-turn overlap operation for the southbound right-turn movement signal phase. These proposed improvements are integrated into the project design to improve operational capacity by providing increased lane and storage capacity for the westbound through and eastbound left-turn movements as well as more green time for the southbound right-turn movement (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix F). The following tables identify the results of the traffic study prepared for the project: 304 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 69 Table 12 Existing Conditions – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street Scenario Eastbound Left Design Queue* Intersection Level-of-Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Period 1.5  Qavg Delay (sec/veh) LOS Volume/Capacity Ratio AM Peak Hour 180 ft 43 D 0.50 MD Peak Hour 240 ft 47 D 0.47 PM Peak Hour 180 ft 39 D 0.45 * Length of available storage in EBL turn pocket: approximately 250 ft. Table 13 Opening Day – With Project – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street Scenario Eastbound Left Design Queue* Intersection Level-of-Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Period 1.5  Qavg Delay (sec/veh) LOS Volume/Capacity Ratio AM Peak Hour 220 ft 39 D 0.46 MD Peak Hour 240 ft 45 D 0.53 PM Peak Hour 220 ft 45 D 0.52 * Length of available storage in EBL turn pocket: approximately 400 ft. Table 14 Future Buildout (Year 2035) – With Project – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street Scenario Eastbound Left Design Queue* Intersection Level-of-Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Period 1.5  Qavg Delay (sec/veh) LOS Volume/Capacity Ratio AM Peak Hour 240 ft 43 D 0.52 MD Peak Hour 300 ft 47 D 0.61 PM Peak Hour 240 ft 46 D 0.59 * Length of available storage in EBL turn pocket: approximately 400 ft. Impact Analysis a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Less Than Significant. Per the City of La Quinta General Plan, the parcel is zoned for commercial use; therefore, the development project is already accounted for in the City’s traffic growth forecasting. Less than significant impacts would occur. Additionally, the site zoning is Community Commercial, which 305 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 70 allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The proposed Project represents approximately 0.22 FAR. Therefore, because the Project proposes less than the maximum allowed under the zoning, a less than significant impact is anticipated. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The flow of vehicle traffic is frequently described using the level of service (LOS) scale, which is a measurement of operational characteristics of traffic flow on a roadway or at the intersection of roadways, based on traffic volumes and facility type. Traffic operations are assessed using levels ranging from “A” to “F,” with “A” representing the highest (best) level of service in terms of travel speed, delay, maneuverability, driver comfort, and convenience. In general, the following descriptions apply to the qualitative levels described above: “A”- free flow; “B” - reasonably free flow; “C” - stable flow; “D” - approaching unstable flow; “E” - unstable flow; and “F” – forced or breakdown flow. The 2017 traffic study identified that approximately13,328 net new vehicle trips will be generated by the project, assuming a conservative 20 percent pass-by trip rate. It is estimated that approximately 1,066 net new trips will occur in the AM peak hour and approximately 1,359 net new trips will occur in the PM peak hour (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix F). The City of La Quinta conducted a Left-turn Queue Study in December 2017, which studied the queuing at the dedicated eastbound left turn storage lane on Avenue 50 at the intersection with Jefferson Street. The study was comprised of 329 signal cycles over two days. The longest queue experienced during the entire study period was 15 cars and that occurred one time over the two days. In accordance with the City of La Quinta’s Engineering Bulletin 06-13 (EB 06-13) left-turn pockets do not need to be designed to the longest possible vehicle queue length but to the 95th percentile queue. In accordance with EB 06-13, the 95th percentile queue length was computed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology to be 11 vehicles and 220 feet in length. Currently, the dedicated eastbound left turn storage lane on Avenue 50 at the intersection of Jefferson Street is approximately 250 feet long. Per the 2017 traffic study, the worst-case queue length of the eastbound left turn lane at Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street at Project opening day will be approximately 240 feet long. With the project, and area buildout, by the year 2035 the traffic study indicated that in the worst-case scenario, the eastbound lane queue length needed would be approximately 300 ft. The Project proposes to extend the eastbound left storage lane to approximately 360 feet, which is greater than the requirements of EB 06-13 and greater than the requirements of the HCM Methodology. The proposed Project improvements listed below will accommodate the projected traffic loading at the intersection. Additionally, the City of La Quinta provides automated traffic light timing at the intersection. The automated timing allows for demand-response/service-convenience timing to the intersection to accommodate better traffic flow at peak times as necessary. The July 2017 traffic study indicated that without the project, the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 will operate at LOS D, assuming a 2 percent ambient growth rate in the area (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix F, Table 3). Assuming the ambient area growth, plus the new expected project trips, as well as the additional westbound through lane capacity, and implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 and project improvements listed above, the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is expected to operate at its current LOS D, which is an acceptable level of service per the 306 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 71 General Plan and EB 06-13, and the proposed full-access driveway on Avenue 50 will operate at LOS A at opening day conditions. Therefore, the impact of this criterion is anticipated to be less than significant with mitigation. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The buildings are proposed to be one story, and approximately 22 feet from floor to roof line. This is consistent with the height of the buildings in the surrounding area. Additionally, there are no design elements of the Project that would result in a potential change in air traffic patterns. No impacts would occur. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant. The Project includes the following traffic control features:  One additional westbound through lane on Avenue 50 along the project frontage, continuing east of the signalized intersection.  Extend the eastbound dedicated storage lane on Avenue 50 at the signalized intersection to the proposed full-access driveway (the easternmost driveway on Avenue 50) to an additional 110 feet for a total storage of 360 feet.  Install a right-turn overlap operation for the southbound right-turn movement signal phase. The Project will allow for two driveways onto Avenue 50, spaced approximately at 460 feet and 720 feet, respectively, from the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. Both driveways are spaced from the intersection in a manner that provides good sight distance and ample turning distance from the intersection.  The eastern driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 460 feet west of the Jefferson Street intersection, will allow for full movement of both left and right turns onto Avenue 50 thereby providing users access to points east of the Project. Shared left-turn and right-turn markings are specifically outlined in Chapter 3 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and such movements are generally allowed at many corner gas stations throughout Southern California.  The western driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 720 feet west the intersection of Jefferson Street, will be restricted to right turns only. As stated above, the driveway from Derek Alan Drive was eliminated due to concerns from surrounding residents. The traffic consultant for the project has stated that it would be unlikely for motorists driving along Jefferson Street to the shopping center would use this driveway. This elimination would have little to no impact on site circulation or on-street circulation/access since it was originally designed to accommodate residents living in the adjacent residential neighborhood. There would be no negative impact for residents using the shopping center and no negative impact for residents accessing their neighborhood since they would still have access to the center from Jefferson Drive and Avenue 50. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. 307 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 72 e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. As previously discussed, the Project would be developed within vacant land, and construction is short-term. Thus, implementation of the Project would not impede or inhibit emergency access. No impacts would occur. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Less Than Significant. The Project would be developed within vacant land, and does not propose long- term construction impacts to the surrounding street system. The SunLine transit agency provides bus service in the region. SunLine currently provides no service within proximity to the project site, and the closest bus stop is located approximately 1.5 miles from the project, at Washington and Avenue 50. SunLine has no plans to install a bus stop at the project location (SunLine Transit, October 3, 2017). The Project includes non-meandering sidewalks along the perimeter, and interior sidewalks offer ADA- compliant access to the perimeter sidewalks. Therefore, the Project can accommodate transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the future. Thus, implementation of the Project would not conflict with public transit and alternative transportation facilities. No impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006:  The proposed site plan shall be redesigned to provide at least 90 feet of stacking at all access points or dedicated right turn into the driveways shall be provided. If one of these standards cannot be met, the applicable access point shall be eliminated. Note: Since the approval of the original Specific Plan, the site plan has been revised to provide at least 90 feet of stacking within the development at all access points through a combination of internal stacking and/or dedicated right turns into the driveways. Therefore, this mitigation measure is no longer applicable to the currently Proposed project. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): TRAF-1 Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 308 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 73 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or X b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. X Environmental Setting CRM Tech prepared two studies for the Project site. The first consisted of Phase I and Phase II cultural assessment conducted in 1998 and 1995 for approximate 50 acres of undeveloped land as part of Tentative Parcel Map No. 29052 and Tentative Tract Map No. 29053, which included a residential development and the current commercial Project site. The study was part of the environmental impact review process for the proposed subdivision and development of the property, as required by the City of La Quinta, Lead Agency for the project, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC §21000, et seq.). The second study was conducted in June 2017 and consisted of a historical/archaeological resources records search, historical background review, and an archaeological field inspection of the approximately 12-acre Project site. The CRM research concluded that no “historic properties,” “historical resources,” or “tribal cultural resources” are present within or adjacent to the Project area. However, CRM identified that there have been previous discoveries in the Project vicinity, an overall high sensitivity to archaeological resources on the Project site, and the potential to encounter subsurface prehistoric cultural remains within the project boundaries. Therefore, CRM TECH recommended that all grading, grubbing, trenching, excavations, and other earth-moving activities in the project area be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. This information and mitigation has been identified in Section V of this document. While the Phase II cultural resources investigation indicated that there were minimal subsurface artifacts recovered from the Phase II survey, the project area is in an area that has high prehistoric sensitivity. Additionally, the project is adjacent to the Chemehuevi Traditional Use Area. For these reasons, the 309 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 74 project area has the possibility of inadvertent discoveries, which may have significant impacts on potential cultural resources that concern the Tribe. There is an increased possibility of encountering cultural resources during the construction processes that may take place because of cultural resources recorded within the project's boundaries, and it is in the vicinity of an area with high archaeological sensitivity. Avoidance, if feasible, would negate adverse effects on the project. CRM TECH, recommended that a qualified archaeologist monitor all grading, grubbing, trenching, excavations, and other earth-moving activities in the project area. Impact Analysis a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), No Impact. There are no resources that have been identified as eligible for listing to the California Register of Historic Places. Therefore, there is no impact. b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. There are no resources supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. Therefore, there is no impact. However, there have been past discoveries in the vicinity, therefore overall archaeological sensitivity of the project location remains high, and the potential of encountering subsurface prehistoric cultural remains within the project boundaries is a potential. Implementation of TCR-1 will reduce the potential impacts to potential undetermined discoveries to less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): TRC-1 Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians or Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians should be present during the initial grading/ground disturbing activities. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 310 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 75 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XVIII. Utilities and Service Systems: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f) Be served by a landfill(s) with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Environmental Setting Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to construct a 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on a 12-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 2, Figure 3). The Assessor Parcel Numbers for this Project are: APNs: 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602- 180-013, and 602-180-014. Per the City of La Quinta General Plan, the Project site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) for commercial use. Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). Its source of water is groundwater and import water. Wastewater services is also provided by the CVWD. The Project site will be served by the Mid-Valley Water Reclamation Plant. The CVWD reports that it annually treats nearly 6.3 billion gallons of 311 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 76 wastewater from throughout the Coachella Valley. The CVWD also has the capacity to increase its wastewater treatment as the Coachella Valley’s population grows. Solid waste in the City is served by Burrtec Waste Recycling Services which transports the waste to the Edom Hill Transfer Station, located in the City of Cathedral City. From the transfer station, the waste is transported to one of three regional landfills: Lamb Canyon, Badlands or El Sobrante, each of which has remaining long-term capacity. Burrtec also provides solid waste and greenwaste recycling services. Impact Analysis a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. Less Than Significant. Once complete, the project will be served by the CVWD’s existing sewer system. Stormwater will be treated through an underground system to collect all of the stormwater runoff from the project site. Therefore, the Project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements and will have a less than significant impact. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant. The CVWD reviewed the Project and identified that it could serve the Project with the existing water and wastewater treatment facilities (CVWD, October 5, 2017). The CVWD identified that utilities are available in the public rights of way; the only water and wastewater improvements required for the Project are on-site pipelines and unit connections to the infrastructure systems, which are subject to connection fees. Therefore, the proposed Project would not require or result in the construction or expansion of new water or wastewater treatment facilities off-site, and the Project would have no significant impacts. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant. The project will not require levels of water usage that would impact stormwater drainage systems on or around the Project site. As discussed in Section IX Hydrology and Water Quality, impervious runoff created from the project will drain into an underground system. Therefore, use of the proposed onsite underground system will not require in new or expanded storm drain public infrastructure that would cause significant environmental effects. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant. The proposed Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and zoning. The CVWD reviewed the Project and identified that it could serve the Project with the existing water and entitlements (CVWD, October 5, 2017). The CVWD identified that the Project lies within the study area of the 2010 Water Management Plan Update. The CVWD identified that the groundwater basin in the Coachella Valley is in a state of overdraft, and each new development contributes incrementally to the overdraft. CVWD identified that its Water Management Plan is in place to reduce overdraft and identifies specific actions for reducing overdraft. The CVWD identified that the Project must comply with elements and actions described in the plan. The proposed Project would not require new or expanded water entitlements, and the Project would have no related significant impacts. 312 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 77 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant. Refer to (b) above. f) Be served by a landfill(s) with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Less Than Significant. Burrtec Waste provides trash collection for the City of La Quinta, and will haul the waste to a transfer station for proper disposal at one of three regional landfills: Lamb Canyon, Badlands or El Sobrante. All three landfills have capacity remaining for the long-term (City of La Quinta, February 19, 2013). Construction Waste: The site is undeveloped, so no demolition waste is anticipated. Small volumes of construction waste are anticipated during construction including pallets, strapping, packaging, excess wood and metal. Due to the small volume of construction-related waste that may be generated during construction, and the millions of cubic yards of remaining capacity at the three regional landfills that would serve the Project, less than significant impacts would occur under this criterion as a result of future construction activities. Operations Waste: The waste generated by this proposed Project is anticipated to be similar to retail centers with similar uses. Annual waste generation is anticipated as follows:  Grocery 63,000 s.f.: 2,920 cubic yards  Shops and banks. 30,000 s.f: 624 cubic yards  Fast Food and restaurants. 32,000 s.f.: 520 cubic yards The three regional landfills have long-term capacity; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. All solid waste generated by the Project during both construction and operation would be handled in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations. The City is currently required to implement new and maintain ongoing waste and recycling programs and recycle at least 50 percent of its solid waste stream, and is meeting that goal (City of La Quinta, February 19, 2013). Therefore, no impacts would occur under this criterion as a result of future Project activities. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 313 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 78 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XVIII. Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long- term environmental goals? X c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Impact Analysis a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. All impacts to the environment, including impacts to habitat for fish and wildlife species, fish and wildlife populations, plant and animal communities, rare and endangered plants and animals, and historical and pre‐historical resources were evaluated as part of this IS/MND. Potential impacts associated with nesting birds were identified however implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 reduces the potential impacts to than significant. Section IV, Biological Resources, addresses the potential impacts and mitigation measures in detail. As there are no other potentially significant impacts and no further mitigation is required in any other area, the adoption of the mitigation measures associated with biological impacts will ensure that the Project as a whole would have less than significant cumulative impacts on the environment in and around the Project area. 314 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 79 Additionally, as previously discussed, a cultural resources records search for the Project was conducted to identify cultural resources within one mile of the project site (CRM, June 5, 2017). The research did not identify any cultural resources within Project site specifically, but identified that Mitigation Measures CUL-1, CUL-2 and CUL-3 were required during grading activities due to a high cultural resources sensitivity. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Less Than Significant Impact. The project objective is to construct a retail center that is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Zoning. The preceding evaluation of project impacts concluded that it can be implemented without causing any significant adverse impacts on any environmental resource issues. Therefore, meeting short-term goals will not be to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed throughout this IS/MND, implementation of the proposed Project has the potential to result in effects to the environment that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable primarily in the categories of Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas and Traffic. The City’s General Plan analysis this site assumed the site was zoned Community Commercial with a FAR of 0.33, which is greater than the 0.22 proposed. Since the General Plan Environmental Impact Report was a City-wide analysis and found significant impacts, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations in the categories of Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas and Traffic. For this project, in all instances where the analysis identified that the Project has the potential to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact to the environment, mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce potential effects to less than significant levels. As such, with incorporation of the mitigation measures imposed throughout this IS/MND, the Project would not contribute to environmental effects that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, and impacts would be less than significant. d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project’s potential to result in environmental effects that could adversely affect human beings, either directly or indirectly, has been discussed throughout this IS/MND, and are primarily in the categories of: Aesthetics, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Traffic. In instances where the analysis identified that the Project has potential to result in direct or indirect adverse effects to human beings, mitigation measures have been applied to reduce the impact to less than significant levels. With required implementation of mitigation measures identified in this IS/MND, construction and operation of the proposed Project would not involve any activities that would result in environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 315 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 80 Section 5 ‐ Summary of Mitigation Measures I. Aesthetics AES-1 Provide shielding for the dual head pole in the southwest corner as per the lighting design engineering recommendations. III. Air Quality AIR-1: Contractor is to implement at a minimum a 10-day painting schedule. IV. Biological Resources BIO - 1: Any grubbing, brushing or tree removal should be conducted outside of the State identified nesting season for migratory birds, which is typically March 15 through September 1. If work cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a migratory nesting bird survey within and adjacent to the project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three (3) days prior to initiating the construction activities. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) will be prepared and implemented. At a minimum, the NBP will include guidelines for addressing active nests, establishing buffers, monitoring, and reporting. The NBP will include a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and an appropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from direct and indirect impact. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be determined by the biologist, and shall be based on the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, and expected types of disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing, within which no vegetation clearing or ground disturbance shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and a monitoring report has been submitted reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta. V. Cultural Resources CUL-1: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified archeological monitor. In the event unanticipated archaeological resources are discovered:  The archaeological monitor shall notify the project foreman  The Archaeological monitor has the authority to temporarily halt work in the area of archaeological discoveries until the resource has been evaluated  All work in the vicinity of the find shall halt  Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until written notification is received from the Project archaeologist 316 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 81 CUL-2: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified paleontological monitor. Paleontological monitors should be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed, to avoid construction delays, and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Monitoring will be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units as described by the San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Sciences May 2, 2017 report are not present, or if present are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. CUL-3: If human remains are encountered during the undertaking, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The local authorities must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. VI. Geology and Soils GEO-1 Prior to grading plan approval, submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, a PMl0 management plan. GEO-2 For portions of the site not immediately under construction, ensure the stabilization of soils through the use of soil cement or re-vegetation, frequent watering. including watering during the evening and weekends during significant wind events; street sweeping or washing during construction, and the chemical stabilization of unpaved construction roadways. VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ – 1 A hazardous spill prevention plan shall be prepared by the Applicant and submitted to the City for approval to minimize the likelihood of a spill shall be prepared prior to construction. The plan shall state the actions that would be required if a spill occurs to prevent contamination of surface waters and provide for cleanup of the spill. The plan shall follow Federal, state, and local safety guidelines and standards to avoid increased exposure to these pollutants. HAZ – 2 If a contaminated area is encountered during construction, construction shall cease in the vicinity of the contaminated area. The construction contractor shall notify all appropriate authorities, including the EPA and the City. If necessary, the contaminated site shall be remediated to minimize the potential for exposure of the public and to allow the Project to be safety constructed. IX. Hydrology and Water Quality HYD-1 Prior to Project approval, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that shall, at minimum, include the following: 317 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 82  Identifies all project related pollutants, impacts to the site’s hydrologic condition, and potential impacts to local waterways caused by Project post-construction runoff;  Identifies BMPs required to remove pollutants from the Projects’ post construction runoff and prevent downstream hydromodification;  Identifies parties responsible for long term operation and maintenance activities of all BMPs;  Identifies the design, operation and maintenance of the underground stormwater collection system. XII. Noise NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows:  Position devices away from the site boundary to the south.  Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier as close to the device;  Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drivethroughs;  Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle;  The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet;  There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example:  Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools  Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises  Turn off idling equipment and vehicles  All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers 318 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 83  All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units  Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment  Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum  Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use  Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications  All on-site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m. XVI. Traffic TRAF-1 Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources TRC-1 Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians or Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians should be present during the initial grading/ground disturbing activities. 319 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 84 Section 6 - References Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017. Focused Traffic Study to Determine the Feasibility of a Full-Access Unsignalized Driveway on Avenue 50 West of Jefferson Street in the City of La Quinta. Antonio Acoustics, June 16, 2017, Lundin Development Com Proposed Retail Development, La Quinta, Noise Study. Antonio Acoustics, September 18, 2017. Retail Development at Ave 50 & Jefferson St - Outdoor Retail Audible Devices California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program: California Important Farmland Finder, http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ciff.html, accessed 8/13/17. City of La Quinta, February 19, 2013. La Quinta 2035 General Plan. Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), October 5, 2017. Pavilion Palms Shopping Center, TPM 2017-0003, SDP 2017-0009, EA 2017-0006, MUP2017-0016, Northwest Comer of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, APN's 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602- 180-013, 602-180-014. CRM Tech, June 5, 2017, Letter Report: Re: Update to Historical/Archaeological Resources Studies Parcel 1, TPM 36539-R (Formerly TPM 29052), City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. CRM TECH Project No. 348/355/3210. Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2006. Construction Equipment Noise Levels. Federal Transit Administration. 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Report Number FTA-VA-90-1003-06. Innovative Design Engineers, August 21, 2017. Pavilions La Quinta, Site Lighting, NWC Avenue 50 & Jefferson St, La Quinta, CA Jericho Systems Inc (Jericho), May 23, 2017. General Biological Resources Assessment And Coachella Valley MSHCP Consistency Review For a 12-acre Parcel (APNs: 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602-180-013, & 602-180-014) City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017. Geotechnical Report, Fairway Plaza, NW Corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California, LCI Report No. LP 17117. San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Sciences (SBCM), May 2, 2017. Paleontology Literature / Records Review, Parcel 1, of Parcel Map 36539-R. Southland Geotechnical, November 5, 1998. Geotechnical Investigation, Lucky’s Shopping Center, NW Corner of Ave 50 and Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California. State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control Website. www.dtsc.ca.gov SunLine Transit Agency, October 3, 2017, Letter to Cheri Flores, Project Planner, City of La Quinta, RE: Pavillion Palms Shopping Center. 320 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 85 Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012. Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan. Warner Engineering, February 19, 2002. Fairway Plaza Shopping Center, Specific Plan Amendment #1, Planning Commission Resolution 2002-006; Originally Approved by the City of La Quinta City Council Resolution 99-63, Adopted May 18, 1999, Original Specific Plan No. 98-034, New Case 98-034 Amended Adopted by City Council on September 19, 2002. 321 [this page left intentionally blank] 322 Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center La Quinta, CA EA2017-0006 Lead Agency: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 323 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND Introduction This Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project has been prepared to report to the decision-making authority of the City of La Quinta of the comments received on the Mitigated Negative Declaration during the public review process. The public review period for the project took place between March 23, 2018 and April 23, 2018. This Final MND includes a list of persons, organizations and public agencies who commented on the Draft MND, the comment letters and responses, a section of errata explaining revisions to the Draft MND which were made in response to comments, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Comments and Responses The City of La Quinta received a total of 12 comment letters from various agencies and residents living in the project vicinity. The following list provides the name of the commenter, his/her affiliation, and the date the letter was sent. The comment letters and responses follow in order of this list. Letter Number Author/Affiliation Date A Katie Croft, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians April 2, 2018 B Gerald Cantarini, La Quinta Renaissance HOA April 3, 2018 C Anthony Madrigal, Jr., Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians April 2, 2018 D Rosie Lua, City of Indio April 10, 2018 E Lijin Sun, J.D., South Coast Air Quality Management District April 17, 2018 F Pat Kelly, Resident of Palmilla April 18, 2018 G Kent Bailey, Resident of Palmilla April 20, 2018 H Ken Hulbert, Palmilla HOA April 21, 2018 I Leila Namvar, Resident of La Quinta Renaissance April 22, 2018 J Robert and Marilyn Lang, Residents of Palmilla April 23, 2018 K Steve Cenicola, Resident of La Quinta Renaissance April 23, 2018 L Anita Petke, Sunline Transit Agency April 20, 2018 324 03-003-2017-004 Dear Ms. Cheri Flores, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments: [VIA EMAIL TO:clflores@la-quinta.org] City of La Quinta Ms. Cheri Flores 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 April 02, 2018 Re: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760)699-6829. You may also email me at ACBCI-THPO@aguacaliente.net. Cordially, Katie Croft Cultural Resources Manager Tribal Historic Preservation Office AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS *The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. #* Kotevewit village, a Tribal Cultural Resource, is located in the project area. #* There is a mitigation measure for an archaeological monitor, but there should also be a mitigation measure for a Native American Monitor during ground disturbing activities. 325 April 23, 2017 Katie Croft, Cultural Resource Manager Tribal Historic Preservation Office Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Katie: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment A-1: The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. Kotevewit village, a Tribal Cultural Resource, is located in the project area. Response A-1: Comments are noted. Mitigation Measures CUL-1, CUL-3 and TCR-1 are included to minimize impacts to cultural and tribal resources. CUL-1—Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified archeological monitor. In the event unanticipated archaeological resources are discovered. • The Archaeological monitor shall notify the project foreman • The Archaeological monitor has the authority to temporarily halt work in the area of archaeological discoveries until the resource has been evaluated • All work in the vicinity of the find shall halt • Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until written notification is received from the Project archaeologist CUL-3—I f human remains are encountered during the undertaking, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The local authorities must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission 326 of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. TCR-1—Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians or Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians should be present during the initial grading/ground disturbing activities. Comment A-2: There is a mitigation measure for an archaeological monitor, but there should also be a mitigation measure for a Native American Monitor during ground disturbing activities. Response A-2: As mentioned in Response A-1 above, the Mitigated Negative Declaration does include in Section XVII, Tribal Cultural Resources, a mitigation measure (TCR-1) which requires a Native American Monitor during ground -moving activities. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. C(ut.L�d ''1� Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 327 LETTER B LA QUINTA RENAISSANCE HOMEOWNERS ASSOUATION April 3 , 2018 Linda Evan, Mayor City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Mayor Pro Tem City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Robert Radi, Council Member City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Ms. Flores and City Council Members Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta, Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 John Pena, Council Member City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Steve Sanchez, Council Member City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 The members of the La Quinta Renaissance Board of Directors represent 103 homeowners of La Quinta Renaissance. The La Quinta Renaissance subdivision is located adjacent to the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. As we have stated in our earlier correspondence dated February 6, 2018, the La Quinta Renaissance Board and residents understand that the property is zoned for commercial use but we have several concerns with this development. It is our understanding that eventually there will be a commercial development at Avenue 50 and Jefferson. Our objective is to protect our residents, protect the La Quinta Renaissance property values and preserve the image of the City of La Quinta. 1- Gas Station and Mini Mart: Our proposal is to remove this aspect of the development. Research shows that there is no or little need for another gas station in this area. Within the square of Washington, Jefferson, -1- 328 Highway 111 and Avenue 50 there are seven (7) gas stations. In addition, there is severe concern that the proposed mini mart will offer an after hour's gang hangout. We are all aware of the crime and gang activity in Indio, which has already attempted to infiltrate the Eastern La Quinta residential areas. Should removal of the gas station and mini mart not be an option, we would offer the following proposal: A. Restrict the size and hours of the operation of the mini mart; B. Relocate the gas station to the east of the project site, closer to Jefferson with a landscape berm; C. Require that the gas station be more aesthetically appealing to the environment. 2. Proposed left turn lane on Avenue 50 near Jefferson: While the developer has proposed infrastructure changes, these changes do not offer a solution to the hazards created by this left turn lane: A. The left turn lane location is too close to the Avenue 50/Jefferson traffic light and intersection; B. The proposal does not adequately address the east/west traffic flow. The submitted traffic study was completed in July of 2017 and did not take into consideration the heavy fluctuation and traffic counts during the November through April period. Without question, the left turn lane as proposed, will create a severe traffic hazard. 3. The heavily traveled eastbound Avenue 50 street creates the gateway to the City of La Quinta. The appearance of the northeast corner should require a more appealing and inviting appearance with stone, landscaping, berms, and possibly a statue. There are many other concerns that should be considered by the City Council: timing of finished build -out of the project, i.e. all proposed building pads, noise control during construction and upon completion, and height of the existing wall. Additionally, the La Quinta Renaissance Board and residents have concern over the developer's ability or willingness to create proper design, color schemes, maintenance and completion timeline. This concem was magnified after the inspection of two similar properties constructed, but not finished by the proposed developer on another construction site. This concern was also communicated by the Indio Planning Commission, who had an unfavorable experience with Loudin Development on both projects. -2- As 329 As the City Council can see, there are many concerns by the La Quinta Renaissance residents and surrounding communities. We are certain that the Council will agree that the majority of our requests are reasonable. Let's make this project a real show stopper. By working together, we can create an image that all La Quinta citizens will be proud of. We look forward to a productive meeting on the 24th. Thank you for again for your consideration of this letter and the Communities concerns. Gerald Cantarini, President Z Betty Zasl wsky, Secretary Very truly yours, Very truly yours, LA QUINTA RENAISSANCE BOARD OF HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION -3- Dick Colliver, Vice -President w6c Garibaldi. Director -At -Large 330 April 23, 2017 Gerald Cantarini, President Lo Quints Renaissance Homeowners Association 79783 Joey Court La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Cantarini: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment B-1: Proposed left turn lane on Avenue 50 near Jefferson: While the developer has proposed infrastructure changes, these changes do not offer a solution to the hazards created by this left turn lane: A. The left turn lane location is too close to the Avenue 50/Jefferson traffic light and intersection; B. The proposal does not adequately address the east/west traffic flow. The submitted traffic study was completed in July of 2017 and did not take into consideration the heavy fluctuation and traffic counts during the November through April period. Without question, the left tum lane as proposed, will create a severe traffic hazard. Response B-1: The traffic section of the Mitigated Negative Declaration analyzed potential hazards due to design features. The eastern driveway on Avenue 50 will allow right and left turns. Shared left -turn and right -turn markings are specifically outlined in Chapter 3 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and such movements are generally allowed at many corner gas stations throughout Southern California. In addition, Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 will be implemented in order to minimize impacts to the Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street intersection due to projected area growth. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 331 LETTER C TWENTY-NINE PALMS BAND OF MISSION INDIANS 46-200 Harrison Place. CoachelIa, California. 92236. Ph. 760.863.2444. Fax: 760,863.2449 April 2, 2018 Cheri Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta alit" VIM% MW APR :, 1018 78-495 Calle Tampico Q _.4, t- --1 WAIF rA La Quinta, CA 92253 OOMM 0EVE. 0PMENT RE: AB 52 CONSULTATION: PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER TPM2017-0003, SDP2017-0009, EA 2017-0006, MUP2017-0016 Dear Ms. Flores, This letter is in regards to consultation in compliance with AB 52 (California Public Resources Code§ 21080.3.1) for the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. As stated in our letter, sent October 24, 2017, the Tribal Historic Preservation Office is aware of numerous cultural resources within 1-mile of the project area and three cultural resources within the project boundary. For these reasons, the report recommended archaeological monitoring during earth -moving activates. There is an increased possibility of encountering cultural resources during the construction processes that may take place because of cultural resources recorded within the project's boundaries, and it is in the vicinity of an area with high archaeological sensitivity. Avoidance, if feasible, would negate adverse effects on the project. The THPO continues to request that approved Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project as indicated in TCR-1. The following conditions (CUL 1-4, TCR-1) would mitigate current concerns for the aforementioned project, however, if there are any changes, please notify the THPO. The Tribe and THPO look forward to continuing working with the City of La Quinta on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Tribal Historic Preservation Office at (760) 775-3259 or by email: TNPConsultation@29palmsbomi-nsn.gov. Sincerely, Anthony a ' al, Jr. Tribal Historic Preservation Officer cc: Darrell Mike, Twenty -Nine Palms Tribal Chairman Sarah Bliss, Twenty -Nine Palms Cultural Resources Manager C-1 332 April 23, 2017 Anthony Madrigal Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians 46-200 Harrison Place Coachella, CA 92236 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Madrigal: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment C-1: This letter is in regards to consultation in compliance with AB 52 (California Public Resources Code§ 21080.3.1) for the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. As stated in our letter, sent October 24, 2017, the Tribal Historic Preservation Office is aware of numerous cultural resources within 1-mile of the project area and three cultural resources within the project boundary. For these reasons, the report recommended archaeological monitoring during earth -moving activates. There is an increased possibility of encountering cultural resources during the construction processes that may take place because of cultural resources recorded within the project's boundaries, and it is in the vicinity of an area with high archaeological sensitivity. Avoidance, if feasible, would negate adverse effects on the project. The THPO continues to request that approved Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project as indicated in TCR-1. The following conditions (CUL 1 -4, TCR-1) would mitigate current concerns for the aforementioned project, however, if there are any changes, please notify the THPO. Response C-1: Comments are noted and mitigation measures are incorporated in the MND document and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. 6WIL Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 333 LETTER D From: Rosie Lua To: Cheri Flores Cc: Les Johnson: Tom Brohard Subject: RE: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center -Jefferson and Ave 50 Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 8:11:38 AM Hi Cheri, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2. At this time, we have no further comments on this D_1 project. Our previous response letter dated October 18, 2017 which summarized priority items discussed in the Initial Study and Focused Traffic Study remain. Please let us know if you have any further questions. Thank you, Rosie Lua Assistant Planner City of Indio fi Inir 760-391-4016 334 October 18, 2017 Development Services Department City of La Quinta Attention: Cheri Flores Design and Development Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center — Initial Site Plan & Focused Traffic Study Dear Ms. Flores, Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project proposed at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. The 125,800 square foot project includes a supermarket, a gas station with convenience market, five pads with drive thru facilities, and other commercial buildings. The following are comments provided by the City's Traffic Engineer responding to the Initial Site Plan and a July 27, 2017 Focused Traffic Study: 1) Trip Generation — While pass -by trip reductions are shown, the Traffic Study does not appear to include a table that summarizes peak hour and daily trip generation forecasts for each proposed building as well as internal trip reductions within and D-2 between the uses on the site itself. (Page 8 of the Traffic Study is missing from my copy of the report)_ 2) Derek Alan Drive Connection —Access is proposed to connect the shopping center to Derek Alan Drive on the north, a local street that serves the gated Renaissance residential development. Left turns out of Derek Alan Drive to northbound Jefferson Street are physically prohibited by a raised median while northbound left turns into Derek Alan Drive are accommodated. The driveway connection between the shopping center and Derek Alan Drive should be eliminated as it will create congestion at the entrance/exit to the gated residential development and it does not facilitate exiting to the north. 335 3) Eastbound Left Turn Lane on Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street — The Traffic Study indicates concerns have been expressed by City of La Quinta staff regarding peak hour queuing in the eastbound left turn lane on Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street. From my observations of this intersection, the longest queues result from parent trips to and from the elementary and middle schools on the north side of Avenue 50 to the west rather than from traditional peak hour commuter trips. Calculations in the Traffic Study indicate that storage for eastbound left turns at Jefferson Street will be adequate in 2019 and will be marginally adequate in Year 2035. Additional left turn storage is proposed to be provided west of the full access driveway for left turns into the proposed full access driveway and for Jefferson Street. This treatment has been used in urbanized areas were left turn storage for stacking may only be marginally adequate. 4) Relocate Avenue 50 Full Access Driveway Further To The West — Before accepting the open-ended eastbound left turn lane shown on the site plan and described immediately above, it is suggested that alternatives be explored in further detail including: a. Flip Building 8 just south of the supermarket with the Pavilions Fuel location southeast of the supermarket. b. Reorient the supermarket so it is parallel to the diagonal at the northwest corner in the site. c. Designate and widen the westerly aisle driveway on Avenue 50 as the major full -access driveway and narrow and limit the easterly driveway on Avenue 50 to right turns only. This would provide a longer throat on the repositioned major full access driveway. Entering the fueling area as currently designed from the main full access driveway could potentially block the entering traffic lane as motorists seek the first opportunity to line up for fuel. To access the fueling positions closest to Avenue 50 requires a sharp right turn greater than 90 degrees. 0 M- D-5 5) Avenue 50 East of Jefferson Street — There are no significant issues associated with the Citrus Plaza Ralphs full access driveway on the north side of Avenue 50 D-6 about 300' east of Jefferson Street. 336 6) Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street Operational Improvements - To improve the traffic signal operation at Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, a westbound right turn green arrow overlap should be considered. With this additional feature and a shorter traffic signal cycle, the intersection operation would improve and delays would be reduced. The City of La Quinta should also consider "conditional service" (a practice used by the City of Indio) so that eastbound left turns could be served a second time in the same signal cycle if a gap in opposing westbound through traffic occurs. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Please contact meat (760) 391-4016 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Rosie Lua Assistant Planner D-7 337 April 23, 2017 Rosie Lua, Assistant Planner City of Indio 100 Civic Center Mall Indio, CA 92201 rlua@indio.oru SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Ms. Lua: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked with and responses are as follows: Comment D-1: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2. At this time, we have no further comments on this project. Our previous response letter dated October 18, 2017 which summarized priority items discussed in the Initial Study and Focused Traffic Study remain. Response D-1: We have included the October 18, 2017 letter and comments from that letter are addressed subsequently. Comment D-2: Trip Generation - While pass -by trip reductions are shown, the Traffic Study does not appear to include a table that summarizes peak hour and daily trip generation forecasts for each proposed building as well as internal trip reductions within and between the uses on the site itself. (Page 8 of the Traffic Study is missing from my copy of the report). Response D-2: Page 8 of the Traffic Study is attached which shows the trip generation. The MND included this information and analyzed the project accordingly. Comment D-3: Derek Alan Drive Connection - Access is proposed to connect the shopping center to Derek Alan Drive on the north, a local street that serves the gated Renaissance residential development. Left turns out of Derek Alan Drive to northbound Jefferson Street are physically prohibited by a raised median while northbound left turns into Derek Alan Drive are accommodated. The driveway connection between the shopping center and Derek Alan Drive should be eliminated as it will create congestion at the entrance/exit to the gated residential development and it does not facilitate exiting to the north. Response D-3: The Derek Alan Drive connection has been eliminated. 338 Comment D-4: Fasthound Left Turn Lane on Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street - The Traffic Study indicates concerns have been expressed by City of Lo Quinta staff regarding peak hour queuing in the eastbound left turn lane on Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street. From my observations of this intersection, the longest queues result from parent trips to and from the elementary and middle schools on the north side of Avenue 50 to the west rather than from traditional peak hour commuter trips. Calculations in the Traffic Study indicate that storage for eastbound left turns at Jefferson Street will be adequate in 2019 and will be marginally adequate in Year 2035. Additional left turn storage is proposed to be provided west of the full access driveway for left turns into the proposed full access driveway and for Jefferson Street. This treatment has been used in urbanized areas were left turn storage for stacking may only be marginally adequate. Response D-4: The MND includes a mitigation measure to account for this situation. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Comment D-5: Relocate Avenue 50 Full Access Driveway Further To The West - Before accepting the open-ended eastbound left turn lane shown on the site plan and described immediately above, it is suggested that alternatives be explored in further detail including: a. Flip Building 8 just south of the supermarket with the Pavilions Fuel location southeast of the supermarket. b. Reorient the supermarket so it is parallel to the diagonal at the northwest corner in the site. c. Designate and widen the westerly aisle driveway on Avenue 50 as the major full - access driveway and narrow and limit the easterly driveway on Avenue 50 to right turns only. This would provide a longer throat on the repositioned major full access driveway. Entering the fueling area as currently designed from the main full access driveway could potentially block the entering traffic lane as motorists seek the first opportunity to line up for fuel. To access the fueling positions closest to Avenue 50 requires a sharp right turn greater than 90 degrees. Response D-5: Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 in the MND would address the concerns with the easterly full access driveway on Avenue 50. Additionally, the suggested alternative configurations would not be feasible since the neighboring communities do not want the fuel center closer to them. Also, reorienting the supermarket would result in inefficient utilization of the property with conflicting diagonal and right angles throughout the parking field and access points. To address the position of the fueling area, the fuel center has been reduced and positioned farther from the Avenue 50 entrance thus eliminating sharp turns. Comment D-6: Avenue 50 East of Jefferson Street - There are no significant issues associated with the Citrus Plaza Ralphs full access driveway on the north side of Avenue 50 about 300' east of Jefferson Street. 339 Response D-6: Thank you for your comment. Comment D-7: Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street Operational Improvements - To improve the traffic signal operation at Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, a westbound right turn green arrow overlap should be considered. With this additional feature and a shorter traffic signal cycle, the intersection operation would improve and delays would be reduced. The City of La Quinta should also consider "conditional service" (a practice used by the City of Indio) so that eastbound left turns could be served a second time in the some signal cycle if a gap in opposing westbound through traffic occurs. Response D-7: Thank you for your comment. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 340 Focused Traffic Study Table 4: Project Trip Generation Summary — Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Building ITE Land Use Code' Daily In Out Total ; In ! Out Total Pavilions 850: Supermarket 6,441 188 232 214 446 274 253 527 16 Retail 1 820 : Shopping Center 3 2 5 8 8 Building 1 932: High-Tummer (Sit -Down) 509 28 25 53 40 34 74 Restaurant Building 2 932 High-Tumover (Sit -Down) 636 35 31 66 50 43 93 Restaurant Building 3 820 : Shopping Center 214 3 2 5 9 10 19 Building 4 820 : Shopping Center 243 3 2 ) 5 10 11 21 Building 5 912 : Drive-in Bank 741 47 41 88 68 I 65 78 133 160 Building 6 912 : Drivo-in Bank 889 56 50 106 82 Building 7 2,604 Gasoline/Service Station 945 : 81 81 162 109 109 218 with Convenience Market 131 268 123 Building 8 934 Fast -Food Restaurant with 2,481 137 114 237 Drive -Through Window 720 37 8 Building 9 931 : Quality Restaurant 45 45 27 72 820 : Shopping Center 250 3 2 5 10 11 21 Shop 1 - - - --- -- 932 ; High -Turnover (Sit -Down) 744 41 37 78 58 50 108 Restaurant PROJECT TRIPS SUBTOTAL 16,660 706 626 1,332 886 813 1,699 20%PASS-BY CREDIT 3,332 141 125 286 177 163 340 TOTAL NET NEW PROJECT TRJPS 13,328 565 501 1,065 709 650 1,359 Institute of Transportation Engineers (nlE , Trip Generation Manual, 9th Ed. (2012) 2 ITE Land Use Code 912 (Drive -In Bank) used for Building 5 due to insufficient data provided for ITE Code 911 (Walk -In Bank) ` Page 18 341 LETTER E SENT VIA E-MAIL AND USPS: April 17, 2018 cfl ores (dj a--qu i n ta. org Cheri Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 8-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above -mentioned document. The following comment is meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final MND. Project Description The Lead Agency proposes to develop a total of 125,800 square -foot mixed -use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project will include various commercial uses, including banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store. Based E-1 on a review of aerial photographs and Figure 2, Site Location, in the MND, SCAQMD staff found that residential uses are located immediately to the south and southwest of the Proposed Project. Compliance with SCAQMD Rules Since the Proposed Project includes gasoline service station, a permit from SCAQMD would be required, and SCAQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for this Project in the Final MND. The assumptions in the air quality analysis in the Final NIND will be the basis for permit conditions and limits. E-2 The Final MND should also demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules, including, but are not limited to, Rule 201 — Permit to Construct, Rule 203 — Permit to Operate, and Rule 461 — Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. If there are permitting questions concerning the gasoline service station, they can be directed to SCAQMD Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-2551. Air Quality Analysis In the Air Quality analysis, the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project's regional construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than significant. However, it does not appear that the Air Quality analysis include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process. This may have likely led to an under -estimation of the Proposed Project's operational air quality impacts. It is important to note that while CaIEEMod2 quantifies mobile source emissions (e.g., trip visits by patrons) associated with operating a gasoline service station, CalEEMod does not quantify the operational stationary source emissions from the storage tanks and fueling equipment. Therefore, it is recommended that the Lead Agency quantify operational emissions from the fueling process in the Final MND. E-3 Health Risk Assessment The Proposed Project would be sited in close proximity to existing residential uses. Benzene, which is a I toxic air contaminant, may be emitted from the Proposed Project's gasoline refueling operations. E-4 t MND. Page 6. '- CalEEmod incorporates up-to-date state and locally approved emission factors and methodologies for estimating pollutant emissions from typical land use development. CalEEMod is the only software model maintained by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and is available free of charge at: www.caleemodxom. 342 SCAQMD staff is concerned about the potential health impacts on the residents from being exposed to benzene. As such, it is recommended that the Lead Agency evaluate, quantify, and perform a health risk E-4 (cont.) assessment for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Guidance for performing a gasoline dispensing station health risk assessment can be found in the SCAQMD's Emission Inventory and Risk Assessment Guidelines for Gasoline Dispensing Stations'. Guidance Re grdi ng Gasoline Dis ensin g Facilities Sited Near Sensitive Receptors SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and SCAQMD to reduce community exposure to source -specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, SCAQMD adopted the Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning' in 2005. Additionally, it is recommended that a 50-foot separation between a gasoline dispensing facility and sensitive land uses (e.g., residential uses)'. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance when making local planning and land use decisions. Mitigation Measures Six mitigation measures from the Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 — Resolution 2002-2006 are incorporated in the MND for the Proposed Project. Since CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures go beyond what is required by law to minimize any significant impacts, and to further reduce criteria pollutant emissions, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following mitigation measures that are more stringent than those from the Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 — Resolution 2002-2006. Regarding the Second Bullet o'litigation Measure — "Low Emission Construction Equipment" To further reduce particulate matter emissions during construction and minimize their impacts on nearby residents, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use off -road diesel -powered construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARB and USEPA Tier 4 off -road emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 horsepower or greater during Project construction. Such equipment will be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a CARB certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least 85 percent reduction in in particulate matter emissions'. A list of CARB verified DPFs are available on the CARB website'. These requirements shall be included in applicable bid documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such equipment. A copy of each unit's certified tier specification or model year specification and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit (if applicable) shall be available upon request at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. In the event that construction equipment cannot meet the Tier 4 engine certification, the Project representative or contractor must demonstrate through future study with written findings supported by substantial evidence that is approved by the Lead Agency before using other technologies/strategies. Alternative applicable strategies may include, but would not be limited to, reduction in the number and/or horsepower rating of construction equipment, limiting the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project, using cleaner vehicle fuel, and/or limiting the number of individual construction project phases occurring simultaneously. ' South Coast Air Quality Management District. Accessed at: httnal■titivw.agmd_govlh�mclpe rmitslrisk_sss�ssmenz a South Coast Air Quality Management District. May 2005. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. Accessed at: hM.LiM�md.govlhomellibrary/d(icuments-support-materiallr)lannine- gu idan celgu idance-doc ument. 5 California Air Resources Board. 2005. Air Oualitv and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Page 4. Accessed at: hitns:fiGF,%vw.arb.ca.ggvlchlhandbavk.pol: e MND. Page 25. 7 California Air Resources Board. November 16-17. 2004. Diesel Off -Road Equipment Measure — Workshop. Page 17. Accessed at: https:ll■�nv■v.arb_cagovlmspro ordicsellpresentations/no■ l6-04 ■vorkshoop.pdF. s Ibid. Page 18. E-5 E-6 343 Regarding the Third Bullet of Mitigation Measure — "Low VOC Paints, Primers, and Coatings " To further reduce VOC emissions from architectural coating, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency require the use of architectural coatings (no more than 50 grams/liter of VOC) that are beyond the limits in SCAQMD Rule 1113 — Architectural Coatings'. Regarding the Sixth Bullet of Mitigation Measure — "Deliveries during Off -Peak Periods" SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency require that no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. This is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's idling policy guidelines10. Closin Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review process. Please provide the SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final MND. When responding to issues raised in the comments, response should provide sufficient details giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. There should be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information do not facilitate the purpose and goal of CEQA on public disclosure and are not meaningful or useful to decision makers and to the public who are interested in the Proposed Project. SCAQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address any air quality questions that may arise from this comment letter. Please contact me at lsun a@g and.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lijin Sun, J.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources LS RVC 180327-04 Control Number Y South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 1111: Architectural httn:Alwww.ttUm_ci.g�rld�eslcl�l'auIt-scrurcelrulc-ixsnklrc ilri 113.pdf 10 California Air Resources Board. June 2009. Written Idling Policy https:lhv►►,Nv.arb.ca. govlmsnronJord ieseUguidancelwritten id I ineeuide. ndf Coatings. Accessed at: Guidelines. Accessed at: E-6 (cont.) E-7 344 April 23, 2017 Lijin Sun, J.D., Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR SCAQMD Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Ms. Sun: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment E-1: Project Description —The Lead Agency proposes to develop a total of 125,800 square -foot mixed -use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project will include various commercial uses, including banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store. Based on a review of aerial photographs and Figure 2, Site Location, in the MND, SCAQMD staff found that residential uses are located immediately to the south and southwest of the Proposed Project. Response E-1: Pages 1 and 8 of the MND identify that while the total project is 125,800 square feet,100,460 square feet was already approved in 2002. The uses approved in 2002 are the same as the uses currently proposed. Therefore, the MND uses the analysis from the previously certified MND (2002) for the approved 100,460 square feet and is only required to focus on the impacts of adding of 25,340 square feet to the retail areas. Comment E-2: Compliance with SCAQMD Rules —Since the Proposed Project includes gasoline service station, a permit from SCAQMD would be required, and SCAQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for this Project in the Final MND. The assumptions in the air quality analysis in the Final MND will be the basis for permit conditions and limits. The Final MND should also demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules, including, but are not limited to, Rule 201- Permit to Construct, Rule 203 - Permit to Operate, and Rule 461- Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. If there are permitting questions concerning the gasoline service station, they can be directed to SCAQMD Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-2551. Response E-2: The applicant has been made aware of the requirement to obtain a permit from the SCQAMD for the gasoline service station. Comment E-3: Air Quality Analysis —In the Air Quality analysis, the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project's regional construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than 345 significant. However, it does not appear that the Air Quality analysis include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process. This may have likely led to an under -estimation of the Proposed Project's operational air quality impacts. It is important to note that while CalEEMod quantifies mobile source emissions (e.g., trip visits by patrons) associated with operating a gasoline service station, CalEEMod does not quantify the operational stationary source emissions from the storage tanks and fueling equipment. Therefore, it is recommended that the Lead Agency quantify operational emissions from the fueling process in the Final MND. Response E-3: The Proposed Project which was analyzed is the added 25,340 square feet to the retail areas. The previous approval included an air quality analysis for the gasoline service station, therefore, no further analysis was conducted for the gasoline station. However, a Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) analysis was prepared for the additional 25,340 square feet, and the results (which were less than significant) were identified in the MND. Comment E-4: Health Risk Assessment —The Proposed Project would be sited in close proximity to existing residential uses. Benzene, which is a toxic air contaminant, may be emitted from the Proposed Project's gasoline refueling operations. SCAQMD staff is concerned about the potential health impacts on the residents from being exposed to benzene. As such, it is recommended that the Lead Agency evaluate, quantify, and perform a health risk assessment for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Guidance for performing a gasoline dispensing station health risk assessment can be found in the SCAQMD's Emission Inventory and Risk Assessment Guidelines for Gasoline Dispensing Stations. Response E-4: The Lead Agency determined that a Health Risk Assessment wasn't necessary since it is not a requirement. The comment will be shared with the Planning Commission for consideration. Comment E-5: Guidance Regarding Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sited Near Sensitive Receptors—SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and SCAQMD to reduce community exposure to source -specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, SCAQMD adopted the Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning in 2005. Additionally, it is recommended that a 50-foot separation between a gasoline dispensing facility and sensitive land uses (e.g., residential uses). SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance when making local planning and land use decisions. Response E-5: Thank you for your comment. The location of the proposed gasoline dispensing facility is over 50 feet away from sensitive uses in the area. The guidance will be considering in planning and land use decisions. Comment E-6: Mitigation Measures —Six mitigation measures from the Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-2006 are incorporated in the MND for the Proposed Project. 346 Since CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures go beyond what is required by law to minimize any significant impacts, and to further reduce criteria pollutant emissions, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following mitigation measures that are more stringent than those from the Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-2006. Regarding the Second Bullet of Mitigation Measure - "Low Emission Construction Equipment" To further reduce particulate matter emissions during construction and minimize their impacts on nearby residents, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use off -road diesel - powered construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARB and USEPA Tier 4 off -road emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 horsepower or greater during Project construction. Such equipment will be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a CARB certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least 85 percent reduction in in particulate matter emissions. A list of CARB verified DPFs are available on the CARB website. These requirements shall be included in applicable bid documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such equipment. A copy of each unit's certified tier specification or model year specification and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit (if applicable) shall be available upon request at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. In the event that construction equipment cannot meet the Tier 4 engine certification, the Project representative or contractor must demonstrate through future study with written findings siipportPd by substantial evidence that is approved by the Lead Agency before using other technologies/strategies. Alternative applicable strategies may include, but would not be limited to, reduction in the number and/or horsepower rating of construction equipment, limiting the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project, using cleaner vehicle fuel, and/or limiting the number of individual construction project phases occurring simultaneously. Regarding the Third Bullet of Mitigation Measure - "Low VOC Paints, Primers, and Coatings" To further reduce VOC emissions from architectural coating, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency require the use of architectural coatings (no more than 50 grams/liter of VOC) that are beyond the limits in SCAQMD Rule 1113 - Architectural Coatings. Regarding the Sixth Bullet of Mitigation Measure - "Deliveries during Off -Peak Periods" SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency require that no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. This is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's idling policy guidelines. Response E-6: Page 22 of the MND states: 6. The operator shall comply with all existing and future California Air Resources Board (CARB) and SCAQMD regulations related to diesel -fueled trucks, which may include among others: (1) meeting more stringent emission standards; (2) retrofitting existing engines with particulate traps; (3) use of low sulfur fuel; and (4) use of alternative fuels or equipment. 347 Additionally, Mitigation Measures will be added to the Final EIR which address SCAQMD's concerns. AIR-2: To the extent feasibly r ' li nt shaltip pints and coatings wi_th_a VO_C content lower than SCAQM❑ Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time develooment occurs. AIR-3: In ac or IU_U, with California Air Resouggs Board' idIinqRolicv .g_ idglin-U,_pQ delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. Comment E-7: Closing —Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review process. Please provide the SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final MND. When responding to issues raised in the comments, response should provide sufficient details giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. There should be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information do not facilitate the purpose and goal of CEQA on public disclosure and are not meaningful or useful to decision makers and to the public who are interested in the Proposed Project. Response E-7: Responses to your comments have been provided as requested. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 348 LETTER F From: Kelly, Pat To. Cheri Flores Subject: Pavilions Palms Shopping Center Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:27:01 PM My name is Pat Kelly and I reside at 50375 Via Puesta Del Sol, La Quinta. This is the Palmilla Development located at Avenue 50 & Jefferson. I have some concerns about the proposed Pavilions Palms Shopping Center 1) It appears that there is a fuel island designed on the southwest portion of the property. I believe this is unsafe and should be moved to the north and up against Jefferson Street. Light pollution from a fuel island, especially if opened 24 hours, will have a negative impact on my residence. 2) How are U-turns from this development going to be prevented at the entrance to Palmilla on Avenue 50.? The City of La Quinta police does an awful job of patrolling Avenue 50 as it is, so how would this safety issue be mitigated? 3) How will the developer mitigate noise that will impact properties near the development? This appears to be a high density development and will have lots of traffic & noise so how will this be addressed? I am concerned that this will have a negative impact on my residence. 4) Avenue 50 is already in terrible shape and this development will likely make it even worse. What is the City of La Quinta's plan to fix the pavement that is already in awful shape, and is basically never even maintained? Thank you, Pat Kelly F-1 April 23, 2017 Pat Kelly 50375 Via Puesta Del Sol La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Pat: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment F-1: It appears that there is a fuel island designed on the southwest portion of the property. I believe this is unsafe and should be moved to the north and up against Jefferson Street. Light pollution from a fuel island, especially if opened 24 hours, will have a negative impact on my residence. How are U-turns from this development going to be prevented at the entrance to Palmilla on Avenue 502 The City of La Quints police does an awful job of patrolling Avenue 50 as it is, so how would this safety issue be mitigated? How will the developer mitigate noise that will impact properties near the development? This appears to be a high density development and will have lots of traffic & noise so how will this be addressed? I am concerned that this will have a negative impact on my residence. Response F-1: The fuel center will be in operation from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. A lighting plan has been designed to result in no light spillage onto surrounding properties. The project includes a full movement access point at the easterly driveway on Avenue 50. Vehicles exiting the shopping center on Avenue 50 would be able to turn left out of this driveway in order to go in the eastbound direction. There would be minimal U-turns at the Palmilla entrance on Avenue 50. A noise study was prepared for the project that evaluated the project's noise impact on the area and was included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The existing ambient noise in the area which is generated from traffic along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is approximately 65 decibels. The noise study shows that the project would not generate noise levels in excess of this. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration included mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. 350 Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive -through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise -producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: ■ Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers 351 All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units Phase in start-up and shut -down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications All on -site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Th�lank you for your participation in the public review process. CG tlt J, Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quints 352 LETTER G From: Kent Bailey To: Cheri Flores Cc: Dana 5 Bak Subject: Proposed Pavilions Palms Center Comment Date: Friday, April 20, 2018 4:42:30 PM Hi Cheri, Thanks for the note, I'll try again! After reviewing the summary of the plan for the proposed shopping, food and fuel center, my wife and I are most concerned. We can understand a need for a modest sized upscale grocery, but find a new center unnecessary when a desireable space is already available nearby. We're disappointed that the developer, the current owner and city haven't worked together to rehab the old Ralph's location and dilapidated mall on Washington and Calle Tampico. As you no doubt know, there is an existing good sized grocery pad and space for numerous retail spaces that are way under utilized. With modest change a 24 pump fuel center could be placed on the lot as well. The 50th and Jefferson location is objectionable to us and many of our neighbors in Palmilla, with our entrance almost across the street from the proposed center. The center would negatively impact our quality of life us in the following ways: Much more traffic and congestion on 50th and at the Jefferson intersection. The Palmilla egress would be especially impacted and difficult. Late night fast food drive thrus and gas pump intercoms... noise pollution some of which would pollute for 24 hrs daily. High intensity lighting creates light pollution, the Ralph's Center across the street has plenty of that already. A larger than needed fuel center would serve hundreds of vehicles daily and further impact traffic on our busy intersection. If it were placed further North on Jefferson that would be Mitgate some of the congestion and be a possible alternative site. Restaurant emissions of smoke and smell such as exists along Hwy I I I between Stater Bros and Wells Fargo is unacceptable in any residential setting such as ours. The commotion and traffic created by the addition of this center would no doubt drive our property values down and in fact lead to lower property tax revenue. We urge the city to say NO to this proposal in favor of a better center on the space across from City Hall on Calle Tampico. J Kent Bailey Dana S Bailey 50415 Via Serenidad LaQuinta Ca 92253 206 890 5386 Cell G-1 353 April 23, 2017 Kent Bailey 50415 Via Serenidad La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Bailey: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: r_��-_i /^ �. -rL- r/laL -_J I_tL_..___ I___i:__ :_ _L:__a:___LI_ a_ .._ .._J �__.. _t _.... L.Urrrr ent G-1: Me JVUr and Jefferson loca ion is objectionable Lu us and many Ur our neighbors in Palmilla, with our entrance almost across the street from the proposed center. The center would negatively impact our quality of life us in the following ways: Much more traffic and congestion on 50th and at the Jefferson intersection. The Palmilla egress would be especially impacted and difficult. Late night fast food drive thrus and gas pump intercoms... noise pollution some of which would pollute for 24 hrs daily. High intensity lighting creates light pollution, the Ralph's Center across the street has plenty of that already. Response G-1: The Mitigated Negative Declaration addresses the impacts of traffic on the Avenue 50 and Jefferson intersection. The project includes a full movement access point at the easterly driveway on Avenue 50. Vehicles exiting the shopping center on Avenue 50 would be able to turn left out of this driveway in order to go in the eastbound direction. There would be minimal U-turns at the Palmilla entrance on Avenue 50. Additionally, implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quints and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. A noise study was prepared for the project that evaluated the project's noise impact on the area and was included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The existing ambient noise in the area which is generated from traffic along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is 354 approximately 65 decibels. The noise study shows that the project would not generate noise levels in excess of this. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration included mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive -through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise -producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles 355 • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as for as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut -down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on -site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The fuel center will be in operation from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. A lighting plan has been designed to result in no light spillage onto surrounding properties. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of Lo Quinta 356 LETTER H As President of Palmilla HOA, a 159-single home development with a main entrance guard gate off of 501h just 500 feet west of Jefferson, our main concerns center around the traffic issues involved with this development. The primary issue concerns location and the stacking capacity of the gas pumps. The gas station has the same number of dispensers as Costco, which implies sales of over 15,000 gallons per day. That translates into roughly 1,000 vehicles per day. However, the stacking design is not as long as the one at Costco that creates a potential bottleneck and interferes with the ingress and egress, thus backing up onto 50th Question: Can you explain your methodology and assumptions for the stacking lanes, especially during peak traffic times? We contend that the movement of the gas station 200 ft north on Jefferson can easily mitigate this issue. 2. Also at issue are concerns regarding the ingress/egress to our community from our main traffic gate on 50th. The current gas station location will force drivers to exit onto west bound traffic onto 50th. We believe that 50% of the new west bound traffic will U-turn at the entry into Palmilla to travel back east or back to Jefferson. (Via Palmilla is our street name.) Question: What were your estimates of U-turn activity and how were they based? We disagree with the EIR assessment and feel that a "no U turn sign" on 50th at our main entrance would discourage this, encourage people to exit onto Jefferson and prevent problems with our access. 3. The EIR indicated that noise issues would be mitigated yet it didn't address whether the fuel dispensers will have the small TV's (audible devises) on top showing minute commercials. This noise travels differently than normal ambient noise. Our homeowners nearest to the gas pumps will be adversely impacted if this is the case. Question: Can we be assured that the gas pumps discussed will not have these screens? If they do, what measures will be taken to mitigate this issue? We feel strongly that this type of audible advertising is intrusive in residential adjacent areas and should not be allowed. H-1 H-2 H-3 4. When our community was being built, Avenue 50 was a two-lane road. Yes, we knew it was going to be widened but the result is that homes adjacent to the street have lost H-4 value due to the noise level. 357 Question: Is the city considering building a sound wall to or raising our community wall to mitigate the growing commercial and traffic noise issues. As the city grows and fills out, we feel that the pressure will increase from local residents to mitigate some of the impact. 5. The developer is anticipating up to 5 fast food restaurants and area residents are concerned about blowing trash. Question: What are the developer's plans to mitigate this issue or will it reside with each fast food establishment? We would like some assurances that a plan is in place and responsibility assigned. 6. As we all know, there are many empty storefronts and restaurants in La Quinta. In addition to the 5 fast food restaurants, the plans call for two free standing bank branches (5,000 and 6,000 sq. feet) with drive -through windows. A report on NBC showed that big banks are still shuttering their locations. Citigroup closed 7 percent of North American branches year over year. And they are looking to take up less space. Technology is dramatically changing how they do business with the ability to do more transactions by computer and phone. We are concerned that this plan is overly ambitious and may wind up with empty commercial storefronts, obsolete bank buildings, and shuttered or less than desirable fast food alternatives. Question: How does the developer plan to roll out the build -out? In addition to the Pavilions market, gas station and convenience market, what other buildings will be built first? Will any other structures be built without a firm commitment from a store, restaurant or bank? What will the empty "pads" look like as we wait for the future commitments? We welcome the addition of the new. high quality grocery store. It will be an added benefit to those of us who live in the neighborhood. We just don't want to live next to an empty shopping center or one that appears "failed" like others in the La Quinta community because they are overbuilt or not in demand (Sam's Club, Ralph's across from city hall, Jules, etc.) We are all proud to call La Quinta home and want it to reflect the appearance and values of our upscale community. H-4 (cont.) H-5 H-6 358 April 23, 2017 Ken Hulbert, President Palmilla Homeowners Association ken.hulbert@daumcommercial.com SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Hulbert: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment H-1: The primary issue concerns location and the stacking capacity of the gas pumps. The gas station has the same number of dispensers as Costco, which implies sales of over 15,000 gallons per day. That translates into roughly 1,000 vehicles per day. However, the stacking design is not as long as the one at Costco that creates a potential bottleneck and interferes with the ingress and egress, thus backing up onto 501n Question: Can you explain your methodology and assumptions for the stacking lanes, especially during peak traffic times? We contend that the movement of the gas station 200 ft north on Jefferson can easily mitigate this issue. Response H-1: The proposed fuel center is not expected serve the needs beyond the immediate community and therefore will operate at significantly less volumes than the fuel center at Costco. As planned, there will be 12 pumping stations with the capacity for 12 additional cars in waiting, for a total of 24 car parked at any one time. Based on the proposed operator's experience, the number of pumps and queue capacity are adequate to safely and conveniently handle expected volumes even at peak hours. Comment H-2: Also at issue are concerns regarding the ingress/egress to our community from our main traffic gate on 50th. The current gas station location will force drivers to exit onto west bound traffic onto 50th. We believe that 50% of the new west bound traffic will U-turn at the entry into Palmilla to travel back east or back to Jefferson. (Via Palmilla is our street name.) Question: What were your estimates of U-turn activity and how were they based? We disagree with the EIR assessment and feel that a "no U turn sign" on 50th at our main entrance would discourage this, encourage people to exit onto Jefferson and prevent problems with our access. 359 Response H-2: The project includes a full movement access point at the easterly driveway on Avenue 50. Vehicles exiting the shopping center on Avenue 50 would be able to turn left out of this driveway in order to go in the eastbound direction. There would be minimal U-turns at the Palmilla entrance on Avenue 50. Comment H-3: The EIR indicated that noise issues would be mitigated yet it didn't address whether the fuel dispensers will have the small TV's (audible devises) on top showing minute commercials. This noise travels differently than normal ambient noise. Our homeowners nearest to the gas pumps will be adversely impacted if this is the case. Question: Can we be assured that the gas pumps discussed will not have these screens? If they do, what measures will be taken to mitigate this issue? We feel strongly that this type of audible advertising is intrusive in residential adjacent areas and should not be allowed. Response H-3: Audible advertising devises are to be restricted from the pump island. Comment H-4: When our community was being built, Avenue 50 was a two-lane road. Yes, we knew it was going to be widened but the result is that homes adjacent to the street have lost value due to the noise level. Question: Is the city considering building a sound wall to or raising our community wall to mitigate the growing commercial and traffic noise issues. As the city grows and fills out, we feel that the pressure will increase from local residents to mitigate some of the impact. Response H-4: Avenue 50 has been designated as a 4-lane divided roadway in the City's General Plan and is currently mostly built to this designation. The project would build out the rest of the roadway per the General Plan designation. A noise study was prepared for the project that evaluated the project's noise impact on the area and was included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The existing ambient noise in the area which is generated from traffic along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is approximately 65 decibels. The noise study shows that the project would not generate noise levels in excess of this. The noise study does not show the need for additional sound walls or raising the Palmilla community wall. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration included mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures. NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. 360 NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive -through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise -producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut -down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum 361 Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications All on -site deliveries shall be limited to between 7.00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Comment H-5: The developer is anticipating up to 5 fast food restaurants and area residents are concerned about blowing trash. Question: What are the developer's plans to mitigate this issue or will it reside with each fast food establishment? We would like some assurances that a plan is in place and responsibility assigned. Response H-5: The project proposes up to 3 drive throughs which would not necessarily all be fast food restaurants. With this submittal, the applicant has not proposed any fast food drive through restaurants. The applicant has indicated that housekeeping to maintain first class standards will be incorporated within the CC & R's. Comment H-6: As we all know, there are many empty storefronts and restaurants in La Quinta. In addition to the 5 fast food restaurants, the plans call for two free standing bank branches (5,000 and 6,000 sq. feet) with drive -through windows. A report on NBC showed that big banks are still shuttering their locations. Citigroup closed 7 percent of North American branches year over year. And they are looking to take up less space. Technology is dramatically changing how they do business with the ability to do more transactions by computer and phone. We are concerned that this plan is overly ambitious and may wind up with empty commercial storefronts, obsolete bank buildings, and shuttered or less than desirable fast food alternatives. Question: How does the developer plan to roll out the build -out? In addition to the Pavilions market, gas station and convenience market, what other buildings will be built first? Will any other structures be built without a firm commitment from a store, restaurant or bank? What will the empty "pads" look like as we wait for the future commitments? Response H-6: In addition to the market, fuel center and convenience market, the initial build -out will include Shops 1 along the north end of the development. In addition, all the infrastructure for the development including all perimeter street improvements, sidewalks and landscaping will be completed with the initial development. Any building area not included with the initial build -out will be treated with a dust control agent and dressed out with decorative ground cover. 362 Thank you for your participation in the public review process. N t't J• �� Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 363 LETTER I April 22, 2017 Cheryl L. Flores Senior Planner City of La Quinta Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta CA, 92253 RE: INITIAL STUDY (IS) FOR THE COMMERCIAL PROJECT TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50. Dear Ms. Flores: Please see the following comments regarding the IS for the above noted project. A) General Comment: The prepared Initial Study is a biased document, since it was commissioned by the applicant and it is only considering the additional (approximate) 20,000 q.ft. that has been added to the project, since the approval of the original Specific Plan (SP) in 1999. Please note that the entire project and its cumulative impacts of building a full shopping center shall be consider, since the original SP was prepared in 1999, where there was no development within two (2) square mile of the project (please see the County of Riverside GIS maps from 1996 & 2011 or see attached). B) Traffic Comments: Based on the Initial Study the traffic study was done in June 2017, and the traffic study refers to the preparation date as March of 2017 (page 14 of traffic study). Collecting the traffic data in June is not accurate, sine it is outside of the season and collecting the traffic data in March is not either, since it is at the tail end of the season. The traffic study is based on the first site plan that delineates an exit on Derek Allen; however, the final site plan does not show this exit. Therefore, the traffic study needs to be updated to show where the cars that "originally" were supposed to exit Derek Allen would go, what is their impact on the other driveway approaches (to and from the site), and on the overall site's circulation. The drive thru for building number two (2) shall be redesign. The proposed design will not work. The turning radius is too sharp and the space is very limited; therefore, the cares need do a three-point turn and back up into the main drive aisle in order to get to the drive thru. This will create a safety problem. Page 1 of 6 1-1 1-2 364 C) Lighting Comments: The site proposes 14, 40-foot light poles. 40' is the height of a three and half story 1-3 building. The proposed height is not acceptable for commercial centers that are abutting residential neighborhoods. D) Noise Comments: The noise study states that: "It is assuming that the development will not operate through the night" (page 3 of noise study). This assumption is wrong, since based on the Specific Plan the convenience store will operate from 5:00 am to 12:00 (until midnight). Therefore, the proposed mitigation measures will not mitigate the noise pollution, since the mitigation measures only may reduce the noise during day and not addressing the noise during night. The noise data was collected from 4:50 pm to 5:50 pm on May 30, 2017 (page 5 of Noise Study). The data (table 2, page 9 of Noise Study) indicates that the noise level exceeds 50 db. (please note 50 db. is the acceptable noise level for sensitive land uses such as residential uses). Even with applying the mitigated measures, the noise level will exceed acceptable noise level (50 db.) for sensitive uses such as residential uses. All above noted issues will impact on the health and the quality of life of the people living adjacent to the proposed Center. Therefore, I respectfully request the City to response to my comments and perhaps update the above noted studies to reflect the actual situation. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Leila amvar 49590 Ali Ct La Quinta CA, 92253 lei lanam varAya hoo.com Cc: Linda Evans, Mayor of La Quinta Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Mayor Pro Tem John Pena, Council Member Robber Radi, Council Member Steve Sanchez, Council Member Page 2of6 1-4 365 Paul Quill, Planning Commission Chair Kevin McCune, Planning Commission Vice Chair Michael Proctor, Planning Commissioner Loretta Currie, Planning Commissioner Michael Proctor, Planning Commissioner Mary Caldwell, Planning Commissioner Robert "Bob" Wright, Planning Commissioner Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Gabriel Perez, Planning Manager Page 3 of 6 366 County of Riverside GIS Maps - 1996 & 2011 Page 4 of 6 367 T7 Irk, 1. 7, Ile if GIS Map - 1996 .1 m w Page 5 of 6 368 W4 jk iilr _& *mm'm Oki wy , OPP '16C April 23, 2017 Leila Namvar 49590 Ali Ct La Quinta, CA 92253 le i la na mva r@ya h oo. co m SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Leila: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment I-1: The prepared Initial Study is a biased document, since it was commissioned by the applicant and it is only considering the additional (approximate) 20,000 q.ft. that has been added to the project, since the approval of the original Specific Plan (SP) in 1999. Please note that the entire project and its cumulative impacts of building a full shopping center shall be consider, since the original SP was prepared in 1999, where there was no development within two (2) square mile of the project (please see the County of Riverside GIS maps from 1996 & 2011 or see attached). Response I-1: The Lead Agency determined that it was appropriate to consider the additional square footage added to the project as allowed by CEQA Section 15162 regarding subsequent environmental analysis. Since the project has already been approved previously and no substantial changes to the project were proposed, the analysis of the additional square footage was appropriate. Cumulative impacts were based on the analysis of the City's 2035 General Plan since the project site is zoned and general planned for commercial use; therefore, the project would have been considered in the General Plan EIR. Comment I-2: Based on the Initial Study the traffic study was done in June 2017, and the traffic study refers to the preparation date as March of 2017 (page 14 of traffic study). Collecting the traffic data in June is not accurate, sine it is outside of the season and collecting the traffic data in March is not either, since it is at the tail end of the season. The traffic study is based on the first site plan that delineates an exit on Derek Allen; however, the final site plan does not show this exit. Therefore, the traffic study needs to be updated to show where the cars that "originally" were supposed to exit Derek Allen would go, what is their impact on the other driveway approaches (to and from the site), and on the overall site's circulation. 370 The drive thru for building number two (2) shall be redesign. The proposed design will not work. The turning radius is too sharp and the space is very limited; therefore, the cares need do a three-point turn and back up into the main drive aisle in order to get to the drive thru. This will create a safety problem. Response I-2: The Mitigated Negative Declaration discussed the impacts of the closure of the Derek Alan Drive driveway. The closure has little to no impact on -site circulation or on - street circulation/access. A limited number of residents living in the surrounding residential neighborhood would be impacted by the closure since they would have to drive on arterial streets (Jefferson St. and Avenue 50) to access the project rather than being able to access the project directly from Derek Alan Drive. Regarding on -street circulation, it is unlikely that northbound Jefferson Street motorists destined to the Shopping Center would drive past the left -turn access driveway on Jefferson Street to turn on to Derek Alan Drive only to have to make another left -turn into the site. Likewise, it is unlikely that southbound Jefferson Street traffic would turn right in large numbers on to Derek Alan Drive in order to make a sharp left -turn to enter the far corner of the Shopping Center when they can just continue straight on Jefferson and make a right -turn at one of the other project driveways closest to their destination within the Center. The applicant will be conditioned to redesign the entry to the drive thru at Building 2. The plan does meet the minimum driveway width required of 12 ft. Comment I-3: The site proposes 14, 40-foot light poles. 40' is the height of a three and half story building. The proposed height is not acceptable for commercial centers that are abutting residential neighborhoods. Response I-3: The site is zoned for Community Commercial use which allows a maximum building height of 40 ft. The parking lot design standards in Municipal Code Section 9.150.100 state that light poles in the parking areas are allowed to be the some height as allowed in the underlying zone or 18 ft., whichever is greater. The light poles would be allowed to be 40 ft. per this section of the code. Additionally, the lighting plan for the project shows that there would be no light spillage onto surrounding properties. Comment I-4: The noise study states that: "It is assuming that the development will not operate through the night" (page 3 of noise study). This assumption is wrong, since based on the Specific Plan the convenience store will operate from 5:00 am to 12:00 (until midnight). Therefore, the proposed mitigation measures will not mitigate the noise pollution, since the mitigation measures only may reduce the noise during day and not addressing the noise during night. The noise data was collected from 4:50 pm to 5:50 pm on May 30, 2017 (page 5 of Noise Study). The data (table 2, page 9 of Noise Study) indicates that the noise level exceeds 50 db. (please note 50 db. is the acceptable noise level for sensitive land uses such as residential uses). Even with applying the mitigated measures, the noise level will exceed acceptable noise level (50 db.) for sensitive uses such as residential uses. 371 Response I-4: The City's Noise Ordinance shows that normal acceptable levels in residential areas are up to 60 dB. Noise limits are 65 dBA from 7 am to 10 pm. The hours of operation for the fuel center would be 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. The projected noise levels from the shopping center would not exceed the normal acceptable levels of 60 dBA or the noise limits in the City's ordinance of 65 dBA. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration incorporated mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures. NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive -through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; ® Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener In the vehicle, • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise -producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools 372 • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises ■ Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut -down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on -site deliveries shall be limited to between 7.00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. C& 6'c �f '� Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 373 LETTER J April 23, 2018 La Quinta City Council and Planning Commission La Quinta City Hall, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California Ladies and Gentlemen, Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed Pavilion Palms development located at the Northwest corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson. As it is currently designed, the development will adversely affect the neighboring communities of Palmilla, Renaissance, Mountain View, Citrus, and Estancia. The plan should undergo close scrutiny and extensive modification to minimize noise, light and air pollution, as well as traffic and telecommunications overload. At a minimum, the fuel center/mini mart and five drive through buildings should be eliminated from the plans for several reasons. Noise/light pollution/air quality • Light pollution from the 24 hour operation of a fuel center. • Noise levels from intercoms and drive through service windows. • Off hour and frequent deliveries to a large Pavilions market and restaurants will cause J-1 continuous disturbances for the adjacent residences. • Emissions from fast food restaurants and cars idling at drive through service windows will diminish the air quality. Traffic telecommunication overload ■ Ave 50 and Jefferson intersection is already heavily traveled and the addition of 300+ cars will create an unsafe traffic egress due to the poorly planned location of the fuel center • There is no transit stop nearby and vehicular traffic will intensify. • Both Avenue 50 and Jefferson are main access routes during festival season and events with high traffic congestion. • Existing telecommunication service in this part of La Quinta is already suboptimal and more development will add to an existing problem. A "LA -Style" strip mall of this magnitude at this location diminishes property values and does not truly fit the small town La Quinta lifestyle. A development with a "village vibe" and farmers market style amenities would better suit the needs and aesthetics of the community. With so much vacant commercial space within the city of La Quinta, we request that the Planning Commission significantly downsize this proposed development and keep large scale commercial developments within the Highway 111/Washington Street corridors. Thank you for your consideration. Res4Lg Rob 50460 Via Amante La Quinta, CA. 92253 J Marlyn Lang J-2 374 April 23, 2017 Robert and Marilyn Lang 50460 Via Amante La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. and Ms. Lang: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment J-1: Noise/light pollution/air quality • Light pollution from the 24 hour operation of a fuel center. • Noise levels from intercoms and drive through service windows. • Off hour and frequent deliveries to a large Pavilions market and restaurants will cause continuous disturbances for the adjacent residences. • Emissions from fast food restaurants and cars idling at drive through service windows will diminish the air quality. Response J-1: Impacts from noise, light pollution and air quality were considered in the project's Mitigated Negative Declaration. The fuel center operating hours will be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. Additionally, the project's lighting plan shows that there would be no light spillage onto surrounding properties. Mitigation measures will be implemented during project construction and operations to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures. NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. 375 NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Comment J-2: Traffic/telecommunication overload • Ave 50 and Jefferson intersection is already heavily traveled and the addition of 300+ cars will create an unsafe traffic egress due to the poorly planned location of the fuel center 376 • There is no transit stop nearby and vehicular traffic will intensify. • Both Avenue 50 and Jefferson are main access routes during festival season and events with high traffic congestion. • Existing telecommunication service in this part of La Quinta is already suboptimal and more development will add to an existing problem. Response J-2: The proposed project has been planned for in the City’s General Plan and was factored into the growth projections of the General Plan. The Mitigated Negative Declaration evaluated traffic impacts and incorporated Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 to reduce traffic impacts. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Additionally, the City continuously coordinates with Sunline Transit Agency to identify opportunities for transit stop locations. At this time, no transit stops are needed, however, that may change in the future. Telecommunication services are continuously being updated as available. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 377 April 20, 2018 La Quinta – Renaissance Cheri L. Flores clflores@la-quinta.org Senior Planner City of La Quinta Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ms. Flores, As a resident of Renaissance at La Quinta, please accept my respectful opposition of the proposed Pavilion Palms Development on the corner of Jefferson and Ave 50th. Although I appreciate the right of the builder to develop his commercially zoned property, I strongly oppose to the type of use and the potential negative impact on those neighborhoods surrounding the project as well as the City of La Quinta as a whole. The City of La Quinta’s General Plan 2035, among other things, aims to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gasses, to provide high quality community design, to promote efficient use of car, to advocate for expansion of other non-motorized means of transportation, to encourage transportation options that do not rely as much on the automobile, and to improve the health of residences by promoting healthy living practices. The proposed commercial project is upsettingly auto oriented. It is more suitable for the I-10 corridor or Highway 111, not a neighborhood community. The project (among other retail uses) is proposing 2 drive-thru fast food facilities, a late night gas station and mini mart selling alcoholic beverages similar to that proposed on the corner of Washington and avenue 50 a few years back, which was not approved. I do not believe you will find any type of similar development with a gas station, mini mart and fast food drive-thru restaurants off of the Hwy 111 corridor in La Quinta. I don’t believe this location should be the first for our beautiful City or neighbors. Concerns from our neighbors as it relates to noise, increased traffic and its impact on air quality; lighting from a late night gas station, minimart and fast food restaurants; possible increase in crime and an impacted view of the Santa Rosa Mountains are just a few reasons this project should be removed from consideration. Also, as we understand from our April 11th meeting which the developer himself attended, the proposed project does not meet the approved requirements in regards to square footage and density. As a result, an amendment to the approved additional environmental review is needed. 378 Please note the developer has a shopping center within the City of Indio (Showcase at Indio Shopping Center). That center is not being maintained properly. The center is full of trash and debris, with vacant dirt pads that are partially covered with weeds. The trash enclosures are dirty and full of trash. The buildings’ paint is faded and 30% of the parking lot trees are either missing or dead. There are shops with boarded and broken windows. It should also be noted that the Center has not been completed since its approval on 2006 and there are still several empty pads including an empty anchor, Super Target, which closed over a year ago. During our meeting with the Developer on Wednesday April 11th, he stated that he only has the Pavilions committed and once again we could end up with the same scenario as indicated above. Less than half occupied and dying landscape. We already have this at the closed Sam’s club location. An empty warehouse, closed gas station and dying landscape. I would like to add that approving this project, the way it has been proposed, will be a huge missed opportunity for the City of La Quinta and the community as whole. The Applicant does not live in our City or even in the Valley. The Applicant owns a great piece of commercial real estate in La Quinta and plans to build it for financial gain “ONLY”, without paying attention to the City’s General Plan and/or basic elements of urban planning. I find this project to be a public health and safety risk for the citizens and visitors of the great City of La Quinta. I do encourage you to review this proposal thoroughly and reject it to be re-designed and to conform to the City’s General Plan. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me directly. Respectfully, Steven Cenicola 79963 Julee court La Quinta, CA. 92253 scenicola@thevintageclub.com Cc: Linda Evans, Mayor of La Quinta Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Mayor Pro Tem Avail Property Management 379 April 23, 2017 Steve Cenicola 79963 Julee Court La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Cenicola: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment K-1: Concerns from our neighbors as it relates to noise, increased traffic and its impact on air quality; lighting from a late night gas station, minimart and fast food restaurants; possible increase in crime and an impacted view of the Santa Rosa Mountains are just a few reasons this project should be removed from consideration. Response K-1: The Mitigated Negative Declaration evaluated impacts regarding noise, traffic, air quality and lighting. Regarding noise, hours of operation in the center would be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. A noise study was prepared for the project that evaluated the project’s noise impact on the area and was included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The existing ambient noise in the area which is generated from traffic along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is approximately 65 decibels. The noise study shows that the project would not generate noise levels in excess of this. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration included mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. 380 NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Regarding traffic and air quality, Mitigation Measures will be implemented to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 381 Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: • All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition, and shall be properly serviced and repaired as needed. ꞏ • Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the project proponent shall demonstrate, or cause to be demonstrated to the Community Development Department that all construction equipment to be utilized shall be low emission, or how the use of low emission construction equipment is infeasible. • Low VOC paints, primers and coatings shall be required for all buildings on the project site. All paints shall be applied using either a high volume/low pressure spray or by hand. • The proposed project shall provide a bus turnout, shelter and associated improvements on Jefferson Street and on Avenue 50, unless Sunline Transit provides written confirmation-that no such turnout(s) or shelters are needed. • As required by the Municipal Code, the businesses operating within the proposed project shall conform to the Transportation Demand Management requirements in place at the time they begin operation. • Deliveries to the project site shall occur during off-peak periods. Mitigation Measures: AIR-1: Contractor is to implement at a minimum a 10-day painting schedule. AIR-2: To the extent feasible, project applicant shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. (added per request by South Coast Air Quality Management District) AIR-3: In accordance with California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines, no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. (added per request by South Coast Air Quality Management District) Additionally, a lighting plan has been designed to result in no light spillage onto surrounding properties. Comment K-2: Also, as we understand from our April 11th meeting which the developer himself attended, the proposed project does not meet the approved requirements in regards to square footage and density. As a result, an amendment to the approved additional environmental review is needed. Response K-2: The applicant has prepared a Specific Plan Amendment and updated Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project which addresses the increase in 382 square footage. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for public review March 23, 2108 through April 23, 2018. Additionally, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allowed under the Community Commercial Zone is 0.30, which would allow up to approximately 162,000 square feet. The project proposes approximately 122,000 square feet, which results in a FAR of 0.22. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 383 Sunl1ne TRANSIT AGENCY A Public Agency April 20, 2018 Cheri Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Pavilion Palms Dear Ms. Cheri Flores: MEMBERS: Desert Ho t Springs Palm Springs Ca thedral City Rancho Mirage Palm Desert Indian Wells La Quinta Indio Coachella Riverside County This letter responds to your request for comments regarding the proposed Pavilion Palms located on the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 within the La Quinta. The SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) staff has reviewed the project and offers the following comments. SunLine staffs assessment conclu des the proposed project will have no impact on transit services. Please keep staff informed of any approvals and/or future changes to the proposed project so we can keep all existing bus stops and services routes current. Additionally, if there is a need for transit service and/or transit amenities in the future, SunLine staff will coordinate it with the City of La Quinta. Should you have questions or concerns regarding this letter, please contact me at 760-343- 3456, ext. 1603. Transit Communications Service Specialist cc: Lauren Skiver, General Manager Stephanie Suriel, Deputy Chief of Administration 32-505 Harry Olive r Trail, Thousand Palms, California 92276 Phone 760-343-3456 Fax 760-343-1986 www.sunline.org 384 April 23, 2017 Anita Petke, Transit Communications Service Specialist 32-505 Harry Oliver Trail Thousand Palms, CA 92276 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Anita: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment L-1: SunLine staff’s assessment concludes the proposed project will have no impact on transit services. Please keep staff informed of any approvals and/or future changes to the proposed project so we can keep all existing bus stops and services routes current. Additionally, if there is a need for transit service and/or transit amenities in the future, SunLine staff will coordinate it with the City of La Quinta. Response L-1: Thank you for your comments. The City will continue to work with Sunline on transit service coordination. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 385 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND Revisions in Response to Comments Received Revisions have been made to the text of the Draft MND for clarification and in response to comments received during the public review period from South Coast Air Quality Management District regarding air quality mitigation measures and in response to revisions in the traffic study. The added air quality mitigation measures reflect typical practices that have been updated since the previous MND was certified in 1999. Following the public comment period for the Draft MND, various Planning Commission and City Council hearings were held between 2018 and 2020 regarding the Project, but the City did not adopt the Draft MND at the time in an effort to continue to work with the developer on aesthetic and other aspects of the Project. In reviewing the November 2020 revisions to the Specific Plan, it was determined that the Project was largely the same as assessed in the March 2018 Initial Study and the revisions proposed are refinements to enhance the Project in accordance with input from the community and City leaders. Because there were no new environmental impacts as a result of the Project revisions, it was unnecessary to re-circulate the Initial Study for public review and comment. The addition of this text does not constitute a substantial revision per Section 15073.5 (c)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. All revisions to the Draft EIR are done with new text being underlined, and deleted text stricken through. Text to be revised in Section 1 Introduction, page 1: The Rancho Cielo Specific Plan (SP 1998-034) was approved in May 1999, for a 111,000 sq. ft. shopping center on 12.5 acres at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. A GPA, ZC, and TPM (TPM 29052) were also approved. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved Specific Plan Amendment No. 1, renamed the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan, of for Land Use and associated parcel map to allow for the development of 100,460 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center with adjacent retail pads on 12.5 acres at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue. The parcel is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The Specific Plan adoption included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. In 2002, an amendment to the Specific Plan was also adopted. To date, that the project has not been constructed. Currently In May 2018, the Lundin Development is requesting requested the City to authorize Amendment No. 2 to the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan to change the name of the approved Specific Plan to “Pavilion Palms” and construct a total of up to 125,800 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center and adjacent retail pads on the 12.5-acre site at the corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue, within the same area of the previously-approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, and its subsequent amendment. Amendment No. 2 would add up to 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses. Proposed uses within the commercial center development are similar to the previously approved plan, and include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 2). Text to be added to Section 1 Introduction, pages 2-3: The City of La Quinta circulated the “Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center, La Quinta, CA” for a public comment period beginning March 23, 2018 and April 23, 2018. The Initial Study concluded that there were no significant impacts where mitigation measures could not be adopted to reduce potential impacts to less 386 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND than significant. The Initial Study concluded that the City could adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Following the public comment period for the Initial Study, various Planning Commission and City Council hearings were held between 2018 and 2020 regarding the Project, but the City did not adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration at the time in an effort to continue to work with the developer on aesthetic and other aspects of the Project. The applicant was asked to revise the Specific Plan to include the following: • Revise the site plan to provide better pedestrian circulation; • Make the gathering spaces a more cohesive part of the plan; • Incorporate improved shade features; • Consider reducing the amount of parking for the center, in favor of more neighborhood design features; • Move the fuel center further to the north along Jefferson Street to create a more iconic corner at Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street; • Explore not having a left out at the eastern driveway on Avenue 50; • Consider what incorporating mixed uses could do for the center; • Show more detail of the corner plaza; • Revise corner building footprints to have better usable indoor space; and • Show renderings of plaza from outside the center. Following a number of meetings with Lundin Development and City Staff, Lundin Development has revised its Specific Plan to more closely align with the requests from the City and the community comments. The November 2020 update submitted as Amendment 2 identifies the same uses as previously proposed and a building area of approximately 124,990, slightly less than the 125,800 evaluated in the March 2018 Initial Study. Features of the Specific Plan as revised November 2020, as well as features included in the Initial Study previously analyzed which did not change as of this November 2020 update include the following: • A 0.23 Floor Area Ratio (FAR), which is still below the allowed 0.30 FAR for the underlying Community Commercial (CC) zone. • Corner building footprints have been revised to provide better usable space and incorporate a patio/plaza toward the interior parking field. • Pedestrian connectivity has been enhanced with pronounced stamped concrete walkways and same treatment at the driveway entrances to the site. • The fuel center has been moved further away from the Avenue 50/Jefferson Street intersection to north along Jefferson Street. • The architectural style of the overall buildings has not changed since the circulation of the Initial Study in March/April 2018. The style is still proposed to be contemporary utilizing materials such as glass, wood, and various metals. Building forms are designed with clean, sharp horizontal and vertical planes. • The architectural features of the buildings along the image corridor of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street have been slightly revised to incorporate varying building heights and rooflines that are up 387 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND to approximately 10 feet over the City’s development standards to provide an iconic statement for the intersection. Variations in color and materials and a large landscape buffer are provided along buildings facing Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street to break up building mass. • Landscaping for the project includes desert tolerant, water-efficient plants (Attachment 2). The plans include landscape berms within the landscape setbacks along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 to improve views into drive-through facilities and parking areas. Additional landscape treatment is proposed along the project’s western wall behind the Pavilions building to screen it from the views of the residences to the west. The applicant has revised the plant palette to include different shade trees, and providing 70% shading of the parking lot which exceeds the minimum 50% required by the Code. • Parking spaces have increased from 463 to ultimately 532 stalls. • Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 would be slated for future construction, requiring a subsequent Site Development Permit. • The Pavilions-branded fuel center will include dispensing of motor vehicle fuel, an automobile- related air/water unit, and an 825 sq. ft. mini-mart that will offer the sale of convenience dry goods and general merchandise, lottery tickets, refrigerated dairy/deli products and prepared food and drinks. The sale of beer, wine and alcohol would be prohibited. Hours of operation for the fuel center (including the mini mart) will be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Similar to the fuel center hours of operation, deliveries for the entire shopping center will be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. • The vehicular circulation includes access from four driveways, two along Jefferson Street and two along Avenue 50. Two driveways will be restricted to right-in, right-out movements. The north driveway along Jefferson Street will be restricted to right-in, right-out and left-in movements. The easternmost driveway along Avenue 50 is proposed to allow full movements in and out of the site. The applicant proposes full movements at this driveway to facilitate access to the supermarket and fuel center. Pedestrian connectivity has been enhanced with pronounced stamped concrete walkways and same treatment at the driveway entrances to the site. • Reconfigure the parcels on the property from 5 to 13 parcels, an increase of 1 parcel from the 12 parcels identified in the March/April 2018 Initial Study. An additional traffic study was conducted at the request of the City. The results are included in Appendix F and Section XVI. The results of the study revealed no additional impacts. In reviewing the November 2020 revisions to the Specific Plan, it was determined that the Project was largely the same as assessed in the March 2018 Initial Study and the revisions proposed are refinements to enhance the Project in accordance with input from the community and City leaders. Because there were no new environmental impacts as a result of the Project revisions, it was unnecessary to re-circulate the Initial Study for public review and comment. The November 2020 revision to the Initial Study reflects the Project revisions/refinements and the results of the assessment of the revisions/refinements. 388 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND Text to be revised in Section 3, Detailed Project Description, pages 5-6: Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to amend the previously approved Fairway Specific Plan by changing the name to “Pavilion Palms,” and constructing a total of maximum 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 would add up to 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses to the 100,460 square feet previously approved. The site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The amended Project, with up to 125,800 square feet represents approximately 0.22 0.23 FAR, below the maximum allowed under the City’s General Plan. The Project site consists of five parcels that total approximately 12 acres. The proposed Project will be anchored by Pavilions grocery store and includes restaurants, banks, and retail units, as well as a fuel center/convenience market. In total, the proposed development would provide approximately up to 125,800 square feet (sf) of gross floor area, which is detailed by building and proposed use in Table 1. The Project proposes to split the parcels to a total of 13 to facilitate overall site management. The project is anticipated to be constructed and opened to the public in approximately two years. For this analysis, the project opening day is assumed to be in the year 2020 2021. Access to the Project is proposed via five driveways (labeled A-E in Figure 3): two to the south on Avenue 50 and, two to the east on Jefferson Street. , and one to the north on Derek Alan Drive. (Table 1 Note: This table was used in the March/April 2018 Initial Study to illustrate the various uses. Project revisions have decreased the overall square footage by approximately 810 square feet. Because the November 2020 proposal represents a slight reduction in square footage, it is not necessary to revise this table). Figure 3 was revised to include November 2020 Site Plan. Text to be revised in Section 4, Environmental Checklist form, #8, page 10: Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to amend the previously approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan by changing the name to “Pavilion Palms,” and constructing a total of maximum 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 would add up to 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses to the 100,460 square feet previously approved. 389 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND Text to be revised in Section 4-I Aesthetics, pages 15-16: Impact Analysis a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact. The CEQA Guidelines do not provide a definition of what constitutes a “scenic vista” or “scenic resource” or a reference as to from what vantage point(s) the scenic vista and/or resource, if any, should be observed. However, a scenic vista can is generally be defined by federal agencies as a viewpoint from a public vantage that provides expansive views of a highly-valued landscape for the benefit of the general public. Common examples include undeveloped hillsides, ridgelines, and open space areas that provide a unifying visual backdrop to a developed area. Scenic resources can generally be defined as those landscape patterns and features that are visually or aesthetically pleasing and that contribute affirmatively to the definition of a distinct community or region such as trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings. The Project is situated on the northwest corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street, which is identified in the City’s Circulation Element as a City Image Corridor. Views within the vicinity of the The Project site from the public right-of-way currently consists of the Project site’s current vacant, disturbed land and electrical transmission overhead lines, including a large steel power pole, in the foreground, with close views of sharply rising rocky mountain ridgelines and outcroppings of the Santa Rosa Mountains in the mid-ground to the west, while the background consisting of views of low-lying residential development and more gentle, even mountain ridgelines views to the north. . The Project site, nor its vicinity, is are not considered by the City to be a scenic vista. As previously discussed, the surrounding land uses include residential and commercial use. The heights of the proposed buildings are consistent with the municipal code and other commercial areas in the vicinity, and are not considered to be obtrusive when compared to the surrounding area. The Project includes architectural elements that includes various slanted roof lines and varying building heights along the frontages and corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street. These features are designed to blend with the elevational irregularity of the natural viewshed and to enhance the view of the built environment as a gateway treatment within the Image Corridor. The elevations of the rooflines vary between approximately 2 and 13 feet above the City standard of 22 foot building height for construction with an image corridor. The rooflines vary in height and shape, and a gateway treatment is encouraged in a City Image Corridor, contributing to varying streetscapes, which the General Plan notes is a scenic resource. Additionally, the increase in roofline heights will not block the views of the natural landscape due to the varied heights and shapes. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site currently consists of vacant, disturbed land. As previously discussed, the surrounding land uses include residential and commercial uses. The height and scale of the proposed buildings are consistent with other commercial areas in the vicinity, and is not considered to be obtrusive when compared to the surrounding area specifically designed to complement the irregular elevation within the public viewshed and serve as a gateway treatment within the Image Corridor. Therefore, the Project architectural features are designed to enhance the visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. 390 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND Text to be revised in Section 4-III Air Quality, Environmental Setting, page 21 Lundin Development is proposing a maximum 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center project on approximately 12 acres. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved a 100,460 square-foot mixed-use commercial center Specific Plan for the 12-acre Project Site. The approval of the Specific Plan included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The City also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR on February 19, 2013. Therefore, the This air quality analysis herein is based on the net increase of approximately 25,340 square-feet of new uses not previously reviewed or approved in the 1999 Specific Plan and subsequent 2012 Updated General Plan. The November 2020 project revisions propose 124.990 square feet of commercial space, less than the maximum square footage analyzed herein; therefore, the air quality assessment performed is adequate to address the project revisions, and no re-assessment is necessary. Text to be added to Section 4-III Air Quality, Mitigation Measures, page 27 and to Section 5, Summary of Mitigation Measures, page 83: AIR-2: To the extent feasible, project applicant shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AIR-3: In accordance with California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines, no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. Text to be added to Section 4-XVI Transportation/Traffic, page 71-72: An updated traffic study was completed in July 2019 per the request of the City to study additional intersections (Appendix E). The 2017 Traffic Study studied the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. The 2019 Traffic Study analyzed the following intersections: • Jefferson Street at Avenue 48 • Jefferson Street at Avenue 49 • Avenue 50 at Park Avenue • Jefferson Street at Avenue 50 • Avenue 50 at Madison Street • Jefferson Street at Pomelo • Jefferson Street at Avenue 52 • Jefferson Street at N project driveway • Avenue 50 at E project driveway To analyze the “existing conditions + project traffic” scenario, the expected project trips were added to the existing traffic volumes at the study intersections according to the anticipated project trip distribution, while the pass-by project trips are added back into the traffic volumes only at the project driveways. 391 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND Additional traffic from a planned expansion of the existing Citrus Plaza, located across Jefferson Street from the proposed Project site, was also added to the opening day traffic volumes, based on project details obtained from the applicant developer and City of Indio staff, to ensure cumulative traffic impacts were analyzed. The 2019 Traffic study identified that all of the Project intersections operate at a similar level of service, with the Project or without the Project, and including ambient growth and growth from the neighboring Citrus Plaza. Text to be revised in Section 4-XVI Transportation/Traffic, page 73: The July 2017 traffic study indicated that without the project, the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 will operate at LOS D, assuming a 2 percent ambient growth rate in the area (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix E, Table 3). Assuming the ambient area growth, plus the new expected project trips, as well as the additional westbound through lane capacity, and implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 and project improvements listed above, the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is expected to operate at its current LOS D, which is an acceptable level of service per the General Plan and EB 06-13., and the proposed full-access driveway on Avenue 50 will operate at LOS A at opening day conditions. However, some delays are expected for vehicles entering traffic on Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 from the project driveways, which are expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. Per EB 06-13, however, this is considered acceptable traffic operations conditions for a stop control at a driveway location. Therefore, the impact of this criterion is anticipated to be less than significant with mitigation. The results of the 2019 Traffic Study identified that all the additional intersections studied with the Project, without the Project, and with the ambient growth of the area, including the Citrus Plaza development, will continue to operate LOS D during AM and PM peak hours, which is the same operating condition without the Project. The impact of this criterion is anticipated to be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 as previously identified. 392 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS AESTHETICS AES-1 Provide shielding for the dual head pole in the southwest corner as per the lighting design engineering recommendations. AIR QUALITY AIR-1: Contractor is to implement at a minimum a 10-day painting schedule. AIR-2: AIR-2: To the extent feasible, project applicant shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AIR-3: In accordance with California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines, no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO - 1: Any grubbing, brushing or tree removal should be conducted outside of the State identified nesting season for migratory birds, which is typically March 15 through September 1. 393 BIO – 1 (continued): If work cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a migratory nesting bird survey within and adjacent to the project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three (3) days prior to initiating the construction activities. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) will be prepared and implemented. At a minimum, the NBP will include guidelines for addressing active nests, establishing buffers, monitoring, and reporting. The NBP will include a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and an appropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from direct and indirect impact. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be determined by the biologist, and shall be based on the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, and expected types of disturbance. The nests and 394 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS BIO – 1 (continued): buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing, within which no vegetation clearing or ground disturbance shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and a monitoring report has been submitted reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta 395 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified archeological monitor. In the event unanticipated archaeological resources are discovered: • The archaeological monitor shall notify the project foreman • The Archaeological monitor has the authority to temporarily halt work in the area of archaeological discoveries until the resource has been evaluated • All work in the vicinity of the find shall halt • Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until written notification is received from the Project archaeologist 396 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS CUL-2: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified paleontological monitor. Paleontological monitors should be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed, to avoid construction delays, and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Monitoring will be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units as described by the San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Sciences May 2, 2017 report are not present, or if present are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. CUL-3: If human remains are encountered during the undertaking, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition 397 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS CUL-3 (continued): pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The local authorities must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-1 Prior to grading plan approval, submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, a PMl0 management plan. GEO-2 For portions of the site not immediately under construction, ensure the stabilization of soils through the use of soil cement or re-vegetation, frequent watering. including watering during the evening and weekends during significant wind events; street sweeping or washing during construction, and the chemical stabilization of unpaved construction roadways. 398 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAZ – 1 A hazardous spill prevention plan shall be prepared by the Applicant and submitted to the City for approval to minimize the likelihood of a spill shall be prepared prior to construction. The plan shall state the actions that would be required if a spill occurs to prevent contamination of surface waters and provide for cleanup of the spill. The plan shall follow Federal, state, and local safety guidelines and standards to avoid increased exposure to these pollutants. HAZ – 2 If a contaminated area is encountered during construction, construction shall cease in the vicinity of the contaminated area. The construction contractor shall notify all appropriate authorities, including the EPA and the City. If necessary, the contaminated site shall be remediated to minimize the potential for exposure of the public and to allow the Project to be safety constructed. 399 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HYD-1 Prior to Project approval, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that shall, at minimum, include the following: • Identifies all project related pollutants, impacts to the site’s hydrologic condition, and potential impacts to local waterways caused by Project post-construction runoff; • Identifies BMPs required to remove pollutants from the Projects’ post construction runoff and prevent downstream hydromodification; • Identifies parties responsible for long term operation and maintenance activities of all BMPs; • Identifies the design, operation and maintenance of the underground stormwater collection system. 400 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS NOISE NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. 401 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: • Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier as close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drivethroughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise- producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. 402 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on-site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m. 403 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on-site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m. 404 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS TRAFFIC TRAF-1 Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. TRIBAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES TRC-1 Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians or Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians should be present during the initial grading/ground disturbing activities. 405 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBERS: SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 APPLICANT: LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 7th day of July, 2020, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Lundin Development Company for approval of the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center, consisting of approximately 125,800 sq. ft., generally located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 more particularly described as: APN 602-180-004 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on June 26, 2020 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 6, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, at the applicant’s request, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California at the October 6, 2020 meeting did refer a portion of the application back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation on adding a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors; and 406 Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 2 of 13 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did discuss on November 24, 2020, a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors and did not recommend the City Council add this provision; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on May 5, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, at the applicant’s request to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearings on February 4 and March 3, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on December 10, 2019, where the Planning Commission recommended approval of this project; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 8, 2019 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 26, 2018 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the traffic study and include an analysis of other intersections in the area; and Specific Plan (Amendment) 2017-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council, having great deference in interpreting the project’s consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies, knowing that it is nearly impossible for a project to be in perfect conformity with each and every 407 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 3 of 13 General Plan Goal and Policy (Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490, 1510-1511), did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.240.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Specific Plan: 1.Consistency with General Plan The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that it will result in the development of an approximate 125,800 sq. ft. shopping center which is permitted in the General Commercial land use designation. The proposed project is consistent with and would not frustrate the Goals and Policies of the General Plan as follows: •Goals LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. •Policy LU-2.2 which requires Specific Plans for projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. This project proposes variations from several development standards; therefore a Specific Plan is appropriate for the project. •Policy CIR-1.12 to reduce vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City by the development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. This project proposes a shopping center near residences which would provide jobs near housing and provide goods and services near residences to shorten vehicle miles traveled. •Policy CIR‐2.3 to develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi-use paths to places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas by providing sidewalks on Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street along the project’s frontage as well as walkable areas within the project site. 408 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 4 of 13 •Policy SC-1.6 to expand the City’s alternative transportation network by providing sidewalks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street to connect gaps in the City’s sidewalk system. •Program PR-1.8.c: to promote and improve public access to farmers markets and grocery stores that sell fresh produce and healthy foods with the establishment of a supermarket at the site. •Policy AQ‐1.6 which states that proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. The project’s MND analyzed these and determined that mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. •Policy BIO-1.2 which states that site‐specific, species-specific surveys shall be required for species not covered by the MSHCP. The project’s MND includes mitigation that requires pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl, which is not a covered species under the MSHCP. •GOAL CUL-1 which supports protection of significant archaeological, historic and paleontological resources which occur in the City. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to include a tribal monitor during ground disturbing activities. •GOAL N‐1 which supports a healthful noise environment which complements the City’s residential and resort character. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. •GOAL GEO-1 which supports the protection of the residents’ health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. The project’s MND determined that with implementation of required building and seismic code 409 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 5 of 13 standards, the project would have a less than significant impact on geological resources. •Policy FH-1.3 which states that the City shall continue to implement development standards that provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and are consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. The project is consistent with this policy since underground retention will be provided that will contain the 100-year storm for the site. •Policy PF‐1.3 which states that the City shall identify all viable financing mechanisms for the funding of construction, maintenance and operation of municipal facilities. The project will be required to pay development impact fees which is a funding mechanism for municipal facilities and public services. •The project conceptual landscape design is consistent with Goal WR-1 and Policy UTL-1.2 as it will result in the efficient use and conservation of the City’s water resources. 2.Public Welfare Approval of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 3.Land Use Compatibility The proposed Specific Plan incorporates a land use that is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties. The property will continue to be zoned as Community Commercial which is intended to provide for the sale of general merchandise, hardware and building materials, food, drugs, sundries, personal services and similar goods and services to 410 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 6 of 13 meet the needs of multi-neighborhood area. The proposed shopping center would result in a floor area ratio of 0.23, which is below the allowed 0.30 floor area ratio in the Community Commercial zone. 4.Property Suitability The uses permitted in the Specific Plan are suitable and appropriate for the subject property in that the site is relatively flat, vacant, and the area can be served by all necessary public services and utilities. The proposed project is located at the intersection of arterial streets and provides convenience to goods and services to residential neighborhoods in the vicinity. Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map: 1.Tentative Parcel Map 37370 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, and Specific Plan 2017-0002 as proposed. The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Commercial land use designation as set forth in the General Plan, and as set forth in Specific Plan 2017- 0002. 2.The design and improvement of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, and Specific Plan 2017- 0002 with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval. 3.The design of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 411 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 7 of 13 environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4.The design of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the project will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality and other public health issues. 5.The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development given the site’s location at the corner of two arterial roadways and the site is relatively flat, vacant, and can be served by all necessary public services and utilities. 6.The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of the code, and the Subdivision Map Act. 7.The design and improvements required for Tentative Parcel Map 37370 will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property. All roadway improvements, easements, if any and surrounding improvements will be completed to City standards. Site Development Permit 2017-0009 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council, having great deference in interpreting the project’s consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies, knowing that it is nearly impossible for a project to be in perfect conformity with each and every General Plan Goal and Policy (Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490, 1510-1511), did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said 412 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 8 of 13 Site Development Permit (which includes the Pavilions Building, Retail 1, Shops 1 and Buildings 3-6 as noted on Exhibit A, Site Plan): 1.Consistency with General Plan The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The City’s General Plan policies relating to General Commercial encourage shopping centers in the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with and would not frustrate the Goals and Policies of the General Plan as follows: •Goals LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. •Policy LU-2.2 which requires Specific Plans for projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. This project proposes variations from several development standards; therefore a Specific Plan is appropriate for the project. •Policy CIR-1.12 to reduce vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City by the development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. This project proposes a shopping center near residences which would provide jobs near housing and provide goods and services near residences to shorten vehicle miles traveled. •Policy CIR‐2.3 to develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi-use paths to places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas by providing sidewalks on Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street along the project’s frontage as well as walkable areas within the project site. 413 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 9 of 13 •Policy SC-1.6 to expand the City’s alternative transportation network by providing sidewalks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street to connect gaps in the City’s sidewalk system. •Program PR-1.8.c: to promote and improve public access to farmers markets and grocery stores that sell fresh produce and healthy foods with the establishment of a supermarket at the site. •Policy AQ‐1.6 which states that proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. The project’s MND analyzed these and determined that mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. •Policy BIO-1.2 which states that site‐specific, species-specific surveys shall be required for species not covered by the MSHCP. The project’s MND includes mitigation that requires pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl, which is not a covered species under the MSHCP. •GOAL CUL-1 which supports protection of significant archaeological, historic and paleontological resources which occur in the City. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to include a tribal monitor during ground disturbing activities. •GOAL N‐1 which supports a healthful noise environment which complements the City’s residential and resort character. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. •GOAL GEO-1 which supports the protection of the residents’ health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. The project’s MND determined that with implementation of required building and seismic code standards, the project would have a less than significant impact on geological resources. 414 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 10 of 13 •Policy FH-1.3 which states that the City shall continue to implement development standards that provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and are consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. The project is consistent with this policy since underground retention will be provided that will contain the 100-year storm for the site. •Policy PF‐1.3 which states that the City shall identify all viable financing mechanisms for the funding of construction, maintenance and operation of municipal facilities. The project will be required to pay development impact fees which is a funding mechanism for municipal facilities and public services. •The project conceptual landscape design is consistent with Goal WR-1 and Policy UTL-1.2 as it will result in the efficient use and conservation of the City’s water resources. 2.Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Community Commercial District as well as the development standards of the City’s Zoning Code and Specific Plan 2017-0002 in terms of architectural style and landscaping. The project satisfies the District’s intent to provide for the sale of general merchandise, hardware and building materials, food, drugs, sundries, personal services and similar goods and services to meet the needs of multi-neighborhood area. The project is generally consistent with the non-residential development standards and permitted use table, except deviations that include requested reductions from landscape setback standards, increased retail building size, and allowance of automotive service station as a permitted use. These development standard and land use deviations may be approved with the Specific Plan Amendment. 3.Compliance with CEQA The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act 415 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 11 of 13 (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4.Architectural Design The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 5.Site Design The site design of the project including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 6.Landscape Design Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture. 416 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 12 of 13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; SECTION 2. That the City Council does hereby approve Specific Plan 2017- 0002, Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 and Site Development Permit 2017- 0009 subject to the Conditions of Approval enclosed as “Exhibit B”, “Exhibit C”, and “Exhibit D” respectively, and incorporated by this reference.. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 15th day of December, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _________________________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 417 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 13 of 13 APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________________ WILLIAM IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 418 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020- XXX - "EXHIBIT B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 1998-034, AMENDMENT 2) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 1 OF 2 SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 GENERAL 1.The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2.Specific Plan 2017-0002 shall be developed in compliance with these conditions, and the approved Specific Plan document. In the event of any conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of Specific Plan 2017- 0002, these conditions shall take precedence. 3.Specific Plan 2017-0002 shall comply with all applicable terms, conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 1998-375 and 2017-0006 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TTM 37370) Site Development Permit 2017-0009 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 4.Within 30 days of City Council approval, applicant shall provide an electronic copy (.pdf) and three bound paper copies of the Final Specific Plan document to the Design and Development Department. The Final Specific Plan shall include all text and graphics, all amendments per this action, and correction of any typographical errors, internal document inconsistencies, and other amendments deemed necessary by the Planning Manager. 5.Fuel center operating hours shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. as stated in the Specific Plan. Any changes that need to be made to these hours after approval of the Specific Plan shall be subject to approval by the Design and Development Director. 6.Representatives from tribes within the project vicinity commented and have requested the following considerations: 420 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX - "EXHIBIT B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 1998-034, AMENDMENT 2) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 2 OF 2 A.The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be onsite during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). B.Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 421 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 1 of 27 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Site Development Permit 2017-0009 shall comply with all applicable conditions for the following related approval(s): Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (Tentative Parcel Map 37370) Specific Plan 2017-0002 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Director of Design and Development shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. Pad Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 shall require, prior to construction of any structures, a Site Development Permit to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. The architectural and landscaping design for these pad buildings shall be congruous with the design approved in Site Development Permit 2017-0006. 4. The Site Development Permit shall expire two years from City Council approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080, unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 5. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required:  Riverside County Fire Marshal  La Quinta Development Services Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality 422 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 2 of 27 Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit)  La Quinta Planning Division  Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department  Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD)  Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)  Imperial Irrigation District (IID)  California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)  State Water Resources Control Board  SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine)  South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 6. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. 423 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 3 of 27 The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required. 8. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 424 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 4 of 27 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 11. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R’s for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit and execute an “AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY” form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 12. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 13. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, site development permit, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 14. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: 425 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 5 of 27 A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – 64 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 128-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – 54 feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 for a total 108-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 15. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the rough grading plans submitted for plan checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1” equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 16. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary prior to approval of the improvements dedicating such right-of- way, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 17. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights-of-way as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – Minimum 18-foot from the R/W- P/L. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – Minimum 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. 426 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 6 of 27 The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately-owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 18.The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 19.Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative parcel map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map 20.The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 21.The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property after the date of approval of the Site Development Permit unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 22.The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. 23.Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 427 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 7 of 27 24. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) a. Widen the west side of the street along frontage as necessary in order to accommodate deceleration/right turn only lanes serving the two entrances to the project. b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide the left turn in with physical left turn out restriction and restore the median landscaping. c. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer d. Reconstruct sidewalk improvements as needed and applicant to reimburse City for sidewalk improvements made to applicant’s frontage through the City’s Capital Improvement Program. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. A deceleration/right turn only lane serving the entrances to the project as approved by the City Engineer c. 12-foot wide landscaped median along the entire boundary of the project plus variable width as needed to accommodate for a left turn lane into the easterly 428 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 8 of 27 Avenue 50 project entry and for a left turn lane for eastbound Avenue 50 traffic at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street as approved by the City Engineer. d. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer e. 6-foot wide sidewalk—The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include a non-curb adjacent 6-foot wide sidewalk along Avenue 50 at a minimum distance of 4 feet from the street curb. The site plan and landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Manager prior to construction. f. The applicant is responsible for the cost to design and install dual eastbound left turn lanes to northbound Jefferson Street when determined by the City Engineer and a traffic study prepared for the applicant per Engineering Bulletin #06-13 that the left-turn volumes cannot be adequately served by the single left-turn lane. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post separate security for the cost to design and install the dual eastbound left turn lanes. This obligation will remain in effect for 10 years after recordation of the final map unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 3) Jefferson Street/Avenue 50 Intersection: All necessary traffic signal modifications in the northwest quadrant of the intersection and any other modifications warranted by the timing and traffic generation of this development. 4) Other required improvements in the right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. 429 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 9 of 27 The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 25. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Jefferson Street (northerly): Right turn in, right turn out, and left turn in movements are permitted. Left turn out movements are prohibited. Jefferson Street (southerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (westerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (easterly): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. 26. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 27. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for 430 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 10 of 27 handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 28. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6” P.C.C./4” c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 29. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid-block street lighting is not required. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as 431 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 11 of 27 approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 32. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 33. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Design and Development Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On-Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal D. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. Off-Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical F. Off-Site Signing & Striping Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal The Off-Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, 432 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 12 of 27 mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On Site Sewer and Water Improvement Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal H. On-Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical I. On-Site Precise Grading Plan 1” = 30’ Horizontal (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off-Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Design and Development Department. “Rough Grading” plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 34. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the “Plans, Notes and Design Guidance” section of the Public Works Development Division at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the 433 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 13 of 27 Design and Development Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 35. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the mylars of all approved improvement plans acceptable to the City Engineer. 36. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 37. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off-site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 38. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 39. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 434 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 14 of 27 40. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 41. When improvements are phased through a “Phasing Plan,” or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off-site improvements and common on-site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the commercial center proceeds in phases, the first phase of development shall include the construction and completion of the Anchor tenant building and associated fuel center, Shop 1, project landscaping and parking areas. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 42. Depending on the timing of the development of this Site Development Permit, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Site Development Permit. 435 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 15 of 27 D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off-Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off-Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20% Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 43. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on-site and off-site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant’s detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 44. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 45. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 46. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 436 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 16 of 27 47. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 48. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 49. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with 437 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 17 of 27 ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 50. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 51. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 52. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 53. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit Site Plan, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance finding review. 54. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 55. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Pavilions Plaza Commercial Development project (TPM37370 and SDP2017-0009), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 438 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 18 of 27 Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 56. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06- 16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 57. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 58. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 59. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 60. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 61. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 62. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape 439 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 19 of 27 setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 63. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 64. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 65. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 66. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. 440 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 20 of 27 UTILITIES 67. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 68. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 69. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 70. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 71. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly-maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 72. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 73. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 441 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 21 of 27 74. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 75. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Commission for their approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Sections 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) and 9.150.080 (Parking Facility Design Standards). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property. Security lighting along the west elevation of the anchor building shall be installed below 20 ft. in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property and not shine directly onto neighboring residences. Any illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 76. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 77. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 78. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Commission approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 79. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 442 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 22 of 27 80. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. 81. Applicant/Developer shall install paving patterns, such as stamped concrete or decorative colored pavers, to delineate and differentiate pedestrian-oriented areas throughout the project from the vehicular circulation, parking areas, ingress and egress, to minimize conflicts between pedestrian and vehicle traffic. Paving patterns shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. PUBLIC SERVICES 82. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 83. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 84. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 85. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 86. Fire Hydrants and Fire Flow: Applicant and/or developer shall separately provide one copy of off-site water system plans detailing existing/proposed fire hydrant(s) and main(s) capable of delivering the minimum fire flow, per CFC Appendix B Table B105.1, within 400 feet to all portions around the proposed structure(s). Minimum fire hydrant location and spacing shall comply with the CFC and NFPA 24. Reference current California Fire Code (CFC) 507.5.1. Plans must be signed by a 443 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 23 of 27 registered Civil Engineer and/or water purveyor prior to Fire Marshal review and approval. Mylar will be signed by the Fire Marshal after review and approval. A. Transportation hydrants shall be added to Jefferson and Avenue 50 in compliance with CFC Appendix C Table C102.1 for the frontage of the project. 87. Fire Department Access: Provide a site plan for fire apparatus access roads and signage. Access roads shall be provided to within 150 feet to all portions of all buildings and shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet. The construction of the access roads shall be all weather and capable of sustaining 60,000 lbs. over two axels for commercial developments. Ref. CFC 503.1.1 and 503.2.1 as amended by the City of La Quinta. 88. Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Ref. CFC 503.4.1 89. Grading Permit Fire Department Review: Submittal to the Office of the Fire Marshal for Precise Grading Permit will be required. 90. Construction Permits Fire Department Review: Submittal of construction plans to the Office of the Fire Marshal for development, construction, installation and operational use permitting will be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Office of the Fire Marshal reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code, and related codes, which are in effect at the time of building plan submittal. 91. Phased Construction Access: If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access for fire protection prior to any construction. Ref. CFC 503.1 92. Fire Sprinkler System: All new commercial structures 3,600 square feet or larger will be required to install a fire sprinkler system. Ref. CFC 903.2 as amended by the City of La Quinta. 93. Fire Alarm and Detection System: A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required and determined at time of building plan review. Ref. CFC 903.4, CFC 907.2 and NFPA 72 444 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 24 of 27 94. Knox Box and Gate Access: Buildings shall be provided with a Knox Box. The Knox Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. All electronically operated gates shall be provided with Knox key switches and automatic sensors for access. Ref. CFC 506.1 95. Addressing: All commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side and additional locations as required. Ref. CFC 505.1 and County of Riverside Office of the Fire Marshal Standard #07-01 96. Landscape clearances: A minimum 3-feet radius clear of vegetation shall be maintained around fire protection equipment, valves and services requiring access. This includes Backflow Valves, Post-Indicator Valves, Fire Department Connections, Fire Hydrants, etc. 97. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Systems: Projects that do not meet the exceptions set forth by the Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal shall provide plans for an emergency responder radio coverage system. Ref. CFC 510.1 and Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Technical Policy #TP19-002 BUILDING DIVISION 98. Building Plans prepared for permitting shall meet applicable California Building Codes effective at the time of submittal. 99. Any building, structure, facility, complex or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public shall be provided barrier free design to ensure that these improvements are accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities. Plans shall fully detail how the proposed facility complies with the California Accessibility Standards defined in Title 24 Chapter 11B and Federal ADA Regulations. MISCELLANEOUS 100. Representatives from tribes within the project vicinity commented and have requested the following considerations: A. The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be onsite during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). 445 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 25 of 27 B. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 101. The County Coroner shall be contacted if human remains are identified during earthmoving activities. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted. The NAHC will make a determination of the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). The City and the landowner will work with the designated MLD to determine the final disposition of the remains. 102. No signage is permitted with this approval. A separate permit from the Design and Development Department is required for any temporary or permanent signs. 103. The applicant shall submit exhibits to the Planning Manager and City Engineer that demonstrate vehicles can turn into approved drive aisles for drive through facilities in one continuous movement prior to precise grading plan approval. The applicant shall modify drive aisle entries for drive through facilities on precise grading and building construction plans if the Planning Manager and City Engineer determine such modifications are necessary to accommodate vehicles turning into drive aisles. 104. The applicant shall install a transition for the eastbound Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street left turn lane that separates the turn lane from the left turn lane into the shopping center from eastbound Avenue 50. This transition will keep the left turn queue for Jefferson Street from backing up into the median break for the shopping center full turn movement. 105. Applicant/Developer shall add metal louvres as a decorative element to the fuel center canopy consistent with the architecture of the convenience store building. The metal louvres shall be reviewed and approved during building plan check. 106. The size of Building 7 shall be no larger than 825 square feet and shall not include the sale of alcoholic beverages. 446 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 26 of 27 107. Public Art shall be dedicated on the project site or the Applicant/Developer shall pay a development fee pursuant to the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 2.65 Art in Public Places. 108. All vacant pads shall be planted with drought tolerant landscaping and decomposed granite and shall include fencing as appropriate so long as they are vacant. The installation of all landscaping and decomposed granite, and fencing as appropriate, shall be completed prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy of the Pavilions store. Any landscaping on vacant pads shall be irrigated and maintained regularly. The final landscape plan for the project shall include plans for fencing, landscaping, irrigation (as applicable), and maintenance for vacant pads. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. 109. The applicant shall add shade features and seating to the interior corner plaza areas and shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. 110. The project sign program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. 111. The height of parking lot lighting shall not exceed 20 feet and shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. 112. The applicant shall install a minimum of 12 electric vehicle charging facilities in the anchor tenant’s parking lot on an accessible route per CBC 11B-228.3. Any future electric vehicle charging facilities in addition to these 12 shall be designed on an accessible route to facilitate compliance once they are installed. 113. The landscape architect shall identify standards for planting, irrigation and maintenance in the final landscape plan and the standards shall be included in Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which shall be recorded on the Property and shall be reviewed and approved by the City. 114. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store, applicant shall record Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) on the Property. The CC&Rs shall (1) require minimum covenants for satisfactory, perpetual maintenance obligations on the Property; (2) 447 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 27 of 27 name the City of La Quinta as an express third party beneficiary; (3) be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation; and (4) state that the CC&Rs cannot be amended without prior written consent of the City. 115.Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store, applicant shall execute and record a maintenance agreement with the Renaissance HOA and the Palmilla HOA. The agreement shall (1) be imposed as an equitable servitude on the Property (2) require satisfactory, perpetual maintenance of the Property, (3) name the City as an express third party beneficiary; (4) be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation; and (5) state that the maintenance agreement cannot be amended without prior written consent of the City. If the applicant shows substantial evidence that the Renaissance and Palmilla HOA’s are not negotiating in good faith, the applicant may provide the evidence to the Design and Development Department and request removal of this condition. 448 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 1 of 22 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Parcel Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Parcel Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the “Subdivision Map Act”), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (“LQMC”). 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required:  Riverside County Fire Marshal  La Quinta Development Services Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit)  La Quinta Planning Division  Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department  Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD)  Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)  Imperial Irrigation District (IID)  California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)  State Water Resources Control Board  SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine)  South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 449 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 2 of 22 4. Coverage under the State of California General Construction Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. 450 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 3 of 22 D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required. 6. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned 451 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 4 of 22 requirements in the CC&R’s for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit and execute an “AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY” form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 10. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 11. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 12. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – 64 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 128-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – 54 feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 for a total 108-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 13. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1” equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line 452 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 5 of 22 alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 14. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights-of- way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 15. The applicant shall create minimum perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights-of-way as follows: A. Jefferson Street - 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 50 - 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately-owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 17. Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative parcel map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map. 18. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other 453 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 6 of 22 encroachments will occur. 19. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 20. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. 21. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 22. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) a. Widen the west side of the street along frontage as necessary in order to accommodate deceleration/right turn only lanes serving the two entrances to the project. b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide the left turn in with physical left turn out restriction and restore the median landscaping. c. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer d. Reconstruct sidewalk improvements as needed and applicant to reimburse City for sidewalk improvements made to applicant’s frontage through the City’s Capital 454 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 7 of 22 Improvement Program. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. A deceleration/right turn only lane serving the entrances to the project as approved by the City Engineer c. 12-foot wide landscaped median along the entire boundary of the project plus variable width as needed to accommodate for a left turn lane into the easterly Avenue 50 project entry and for a left turn lane for eastbound Avenue 50 traffic at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street as approved by the City Engineer. d. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer e. 6-foot wide sidewalk—The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include a non-curb adjacent 6-foot wide sidewalk along Avenue 50 at a minimum distance of 4 feet from the street curb. The site plan and landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Manager prior to construction. f. The applicant is responsible for the cost to design and install dual eastbound left turn lanes to northbound Jefferson Street when determined by the City Engineer and a traffic study prepared for the applicant per Engineering Bulletin #06-13 that the left-turn volumes cannot be adequately served by the single left-turn 455 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 8 of 22 lane. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post separate security for the cost to design and install the dual eastbound left turn lanes. This obligation will remain in effect for 10 years after recordation of the final map unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 3) Jefferson Street/Avenue 50 Intersection: All necessary traffic signal modifications in the northwest quadrant of the intersection and any other modifications warranted by the timing and traffic generation of this development. 4) Other required improvements in the right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 23. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Jefferson Street (northerly): Right turn in, right turn out, and left turn in movements are permitted. Left turn out movements are prohibited. Jefferson Street (southerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (westerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (easterly): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. 24. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall install a transition for the eastbound Avenue 50 to 456 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 9 of 22 northbound Jefferson Street left turn lane that separates the turn lane from the left turn lane into the shopping center from eastbound Avenue 50. This transition will keep the left turn queue for Jefferson Street from backing up into the median break for the shopping center full turn movement. FINAL MAPS 26. Prior to the City’s approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. The Final Map shall be 1” = 40’ scale. PARKING and ACCESS POINTS 27. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may 457 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 10 of 22 require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 28. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6” P.C.C./4” c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 29. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid-block street lighting is not required. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 32. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply 458 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 11 of 22 with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 33. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Division. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On-Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal D. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. Off-Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical F. Off-Site Signing & Striping Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal The Off-Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On Site Sewer and Water Improvement Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal H. On-Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical I. On-Site Precise Grading Plan 1” = 30’ Horizontal (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) 459 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 12 of 22 Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off-Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. “Rough Grading” plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. The applicant shall prepare an accessibility assessment on a marked up print of the building floor plan identifying every building egress and notes the 2016 California Building Code accessibility requirements associated with each door. The assessment must comply with submittal requirements of the Building & Safety Division. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 34. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the “Plans, Notes and Design Guidance” section of the Design and Development Department at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Design and Development Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 35. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 460 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 13 of 22 36.Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 37.Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off-site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 38.Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 39.Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 40.Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 41.When improvements are phased through a “Phasing Plan,” or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off-site 461 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 14 of 22 improvements and common on-site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 42. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Parcel Map, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Tentative Parcel Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off-Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off-Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20% Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of 462 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 15 of 22 the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 43. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on-site and off-site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant’s detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 44. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 45. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 46. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 47. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and 463 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 16 of 22 D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A WQMP prepared by an appropriate professional registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 48. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 49. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 50. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 464 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 17 of 22 51. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 52. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 53. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 54. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 55. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Pavilions Plaza Commercial Development project (TPM37370 and SDP2017-0009), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 56. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06- 16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 465 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 18 of 22 57. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 58. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 59. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 60. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 61. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 62. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 63. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 64. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 65. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream 466 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 19 of 22 drainage relief route. 66. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 67. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 68. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 69. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed 467 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 20 of 22 development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 70. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 71. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly-maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 72. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 73. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 74. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 75. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Commission for their approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) and 9.150.080 (Parking Facility Design Standards). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height and shall be 468 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 21 of 22 shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property. Security lighting along the west elevation of the anchor building shall be installed below 20 ft. in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property and not shine directly onto neighboring residences. Any illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 76. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 77. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 78. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Commission approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 79. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 80. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. 81. All vacant pads shall be planted with drought tolerant landscaping and decomposed granite and shall include fencing as appropriate so long as they are vacant. The installation of all landscaping and decomposed granite, and fencing as appropriate, shall be completed prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy of the Pavilions store. Any landscaping on vacant pads shall be irrigated and maintained regularly. 469 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 22 of 22 The final landscape plan for the project shall include plans for fencing, landscaping, irrigation (as applicable), and maintenance for vacant pads. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. PUBLIC SERVICES 82. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 83. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 84. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 85. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 470 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50. CASE NUMBERS: SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 APPLICANT: LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 7th day of July, 2020, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Lundin Development Company for approval of the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center, consisting of approximately 125,800 sq. ft., generally located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 more particularly described as: APN 602-180-004 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on June 26, 2020 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 6, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, at the applicant’s request, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California at the October 6, 2020 meeting did refer a portion of the application back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation on adding a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors; and 471 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 2 of 13 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did discuss on November 24, 2020, a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors and did not recommend the City Council add this provision; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on May 5, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, at the applicant’s request to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearings on February 4 and March 3, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on December 10, 2019, where the Planning Commission recommended approval of this project; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 8, 2019 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 26, 2018 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the traffic study and include an analysis of other intersections in the area; and Specific Plan (Amendment) 2017-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council, having great deference in interpreting the project’s consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies, knowing that it is nearly impossible for a project to be in perfect conformity with each and every 472 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 3 of 13 General Plan Goal and Policy (Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490, 1510-1511), did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.240.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Specific Plan: 1.Consistency with General Plan The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that it will result in the development of an approximate 125,800 sq. ft. shopping center which is permitted in the General Commercial land use designation. The proposed project is consistent with and would not frustrate the Goals and Policies of the General Plan as follows: •Goals LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. •Policy LU-2.2 which requires Specific Plans for projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. This project proposes variations from several development standards; therefore a Specific Plan is appropriate for the project. •Policy CIR-1.12 to reduce vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City by the development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. This project proposes a shopping center near residences which would provide jobs near housing and provide goods and services near residences to shorten vehicle miles traveled. •Policy CIR‐2.3 to develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi-use paths to places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas by providing sidewalks on Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street along the project’s frontage as well as walkable areas within the project site. 473 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 4 of 13 •Policy SC-1.6 to expand the City’s alternative transportation network by providing sidewalks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street to connect gaps in the City’s sidewalk system. •Program PR-1.8.c: to promote and improve public access to farmers markets and grocery stores that sell fresh produce and healthy foods with the establishment of a supermarket at the site. •Policy AQ‐1.6 which states that proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. The project’s MND analyzed these and determined that mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. •Policy BIO-1.2 which states that site‐specific, species-specific surveys shall be required for species not covered by the MSHCP. The project’s MND includes mitigation that requires pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl, which is not a covered species under the MSHCP. •GOAL CUL-1 which supports protection of significant archaeological, historic and paleontological resources which occur in the City. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to include a tribal monitor during ground disturbing activities. •GOAL N‐1 which supports a healthful noise environment which complements the City’s residential and resort character. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. •GOAL GEO-1 which supports the protection of the residents’ health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. The project’s MND determined that with implementation of required building and seismic code 474 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 5 of 13 standards, the project would have a less than significant impact on geological resources. •Policy FH-1.3 which states that the City shall continue to implement development standards that provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and are consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. The project is consistent with this policy since underground retention will be provided that will contain the 100-year storm for the site. •Policy PF‐1.3 which states that the City shall identify all viable financing mechanisms for the funding of construction, maintenance and operation of municipal facilities. The project will be required to pay development impact fees which is a funding mechanism for municipal facilities and public services. •The project conceptual landscape design is consistent with Goal WR-1 and Policy UTL-1.2 as it will result in the efficient use and conservation of the City’s water resources. 2.Public Welfare Approval of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 3.Land Use Compatibility The proposed Specific Plan incorporates a land use that is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties. The property will continue to be zoned as Community Commercial which is intended to provide for the sale of general merchandise, hardware and building materials, food, drugs, sundries, personal services and similar goods and services to 475 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 6 of 13 meet the needs of multi-neighborhood area. The proposed shopping center would result in a floor area ratio of 0.23, which is below the allowed 0.30 floor area ratio in the Community Commercial zone. 4.Property Suitability The uses permitted in the Specific Plan are suitable and appropriate for the subject property in that the site is relatively flat, vacant, and the area can be served by all necessary public services and utilities. The proposed project is located at the intersection of arterial streets and provides convenience to goods and services to residential neighborhoods in the vicinity. Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map: 1.Tentative Parcel Map 37370 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, and Specific Plan 2017-0002 as proposed. The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Commercial land use designation as set forth in the General Plan, and as set forth in Specific Plan 2017- 0002. 2.The design and improvement of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, and Specific Plan 2017- 0002 with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval. 3.The design of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 476 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 7 of 13 environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4.The design of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the project will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality and other public health issues. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development given the site’s location at the corner of two arterial roadways and the site is relatively flat, vacant, and can be served by all necessary public services and utilities. 6.The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of the code, and the Subdivision Map Act. 7.The design and improvements required for Tentative Parcel Map 37370 will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property. All roadway improvements, easements, if any and surrounding improvements will be completed to City standards. Site Development Permit 2017-0009 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council, having great deference in interpreting the project’s consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies, knowing that it is nearly impossible for a project to be in perfect conformity with each and every General Plan Goal and Policy (Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490, 1510-1511), did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said 477 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 8 of 13 Site Development Permit (which includes the Pavilions Building, Retail 1, Shops 1 and Buildings 3 and 4, as noted on Exhibit A, Site Plan): 1.Consistency with General Plan The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The City’s General Plan policies relating to General Commercial encourage shopping centers in the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with and would not frustrate the Goals and Policies of the General Plan as follows: •Goals LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. •Policy LU-2.2 which requires Specific Plans for projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. This project proposes variations from several development standards; therefore a Specific Plan is appropriate for the project. •Policy CIR-1.12 to reduce vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City by the development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. This project proposes a shopping center near residences which would provide jobs near housing and provide goods and services near residences to shorten vehicle miles traveled. •Policy CIR‐2.3 to develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi-use paths to places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas by providing sidewalks on Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street along the project’s frontage as well as walkable areas within the project site. 478 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 9 of 13 •Policy SC-1.6 to expand the City’s alternative transportation network by providing sidewalks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street to connect gaps in the City’s sidewalk system. •Program PR-1.8.c: to promote and improve public access to farmers markets and grocery stores that sell fresh produce and healthy foods with the establishment of a supermarket at the site. •Policy AQ‐1.6 which states that proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. The project’s MND analyzed these and determined that mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. •Policy BIO-1.2 which states that site‐specific, species-specific surveys shall be required for species not covered by the MSHCP. The project’s MND includes mitigation that requires pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl, which is not a covered species under the MSHCP. •GOAL CUL-1 which supports protection of significant archaeological, historic and paleontological resources which occur in the City. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to include a tribal monitor during ground disturbing activities. •GOAL N‐1 which supports a healthful noise environment which complements the City’s residential and resort character. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. •GOAL GEO-1 which supports the protection of the residents’ health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. The project’s MND determined that with implementation of required building and seismic code standards, the project would have a less than significant impact on geological resources. 479 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 10 of 13 •Policy FH-1.3 which states that the City shall continue to implement development standards that provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and are consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. The project is consistent with this policy since underground retention will be provided that will contain the 100-year storm for the site. •Policy PF‐1.3 which states that the City shall identify all viable financing mechanisms for the funding of construction, maintenance and operation of municipal facilities. The project will be required to pay development impact fees which is a funding mechanism for municipal facilities and public services. •The project conceptual landscape design is consistent with Goal WR-1 and Policy UTL-1.2 as it will result in the efficient use and conservation of the City’s water resources. 2.Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Community Commercial District as well as the development standards of the City’s Zoning Code and Specific Plan 2017-0002 in terms of architectural style and landscaping. The project satisfies the District’s intent to provide for the sale of general merchandise, hardware and building materials, food, drugs, sundries, personal services and similar goods and services to meet the needs of multi-neighborhood area. The project is generally consistent with the non-residential development standards and permitted use table, except deviations that include requested reductions from landscape setback standards, increased retail building size, and allowance of automotive service station as a permitted use. These development standard and land use deviations may be approved with the Specific Plan Amendment. 3.Compliance with CEQA The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act 480 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 11 of 13 (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4.Architectural Design The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 5.Site Design The site design of the project including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 6.Landscape Design Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture. 481 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 12 of 13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; SECTION 2. That the City Council does hereby approve Specific Plan 2017- 0002, Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 and Site Development Permit 2017- 0009 subject to the Conditions of Approval enclosed as “Exhibit B”, “Exhibit C”, and “Exhibit D” respectively, and incorporated by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 15th day of December, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _________________________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk 482 City Council Resolution 2020 - Specific Plan 2017-0002 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center December 15, 2020 Page 13 of 13 APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________________ WILLIAM IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 483 484 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 1998-034, AMENDMENT 2) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 1 OF 2 SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Specific Plan 2017-0002 shall be developed in compliance with these conditions, and the approved Specific Plan document. In the event of any conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of Specific Plan 2017- 0002, these conditions shall take precedence. 3. Specific Plan 2017-0002 shall comply with all applicable terms, conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 1998-375 and 2017-0006 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TTM 37370) Site Development Permit 2017-0009 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 4. Within 30 days of City Council approval, applicant shall provide an electronic copy (.pdf) and three bound paper copies of the Final Specific Plan document to the Design and Development Department. The Final Specific Plan shall include all text and graphics, all amendments per this action, and correction of any typographical errors, internal document inconsistencies, and other amendments deemed necessary by the Planning Manager. 5. Fuel center operating hours shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. as stated in the Specific Plan. Any changes that need to be made to these hours after approval of the Specific Plan shall be subject to approval by the Design and Development Director. 6. Representatives from tribes within the project vicinity commented and have requested the following considerations: 485 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 1998-034, AMENDMENT 2) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 2 OF 2 A.The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be onsite during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). B.Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 486 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 1 of 27 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Site Development Permit 2017-0009 shall comply with all applicable conditions for the following related approval(s): Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (Tentative Parcel Map 37370) Specific Plan 2017-0002 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Director of Design and Development shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. Pad Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 shall require, prior to construction of any structures, a Site Development Permit to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. The architectural and landscaping design for these pad buildings shall be congruous with the design approved in Site Development Permit 2017-0006. 4. Pad Buildings 5 and 6 shall require, prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store, a Site Development Permit to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. The architectural and landscaping design for these pad buildings shall be congruous with the design approved in Site Development Permit 2017- 0006. 5. The Site Development Permit shall expire two years from City Council approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080, unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 6. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by 487 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 2 of 27 the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required:  Riverside County Fire Marshal  La Quinta Development Services Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit)  La Quinta Planning Division  Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department  Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD)  Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)  Imperial Irrigation District (IID)  California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)  State Water Resources Control Board  SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine)  South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 7. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 8. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation 488 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 3 of 27 of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required. 9. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that 489 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 4 of 27 the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 11. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 12. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R’s for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit and execute an “AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY” form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 14. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in 490 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 5 of 27 conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, site development permit, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 15. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – 64 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 128-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – 54 feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 for a total 108-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 16. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the rough grading plans submitted for plan checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1” equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 17. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary prior to approval of the improvements dedicating such right-of- way, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-way within 60 days 491 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 6 of 27 of a written request by the City. 18. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights-of-way as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – Minimum 18-foot from the R/W- P/L. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – Minimum 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately-owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 19. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 20. Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative parcel map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map 21. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 22. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property after the date of approval of the Site Development Permit unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) 492 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 7 of 27 & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. 24. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 25. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) a. Widen the west side of the street along frontage as necessary in order to accommodate deceleration/right turn only lanes serving the two entrances to the project. b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide the left turn in with physical left turn out restriction and restore the median landscaping. c. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer d. Reconstruct sidewalk improvements as needed and applicant to reimburse City for sidewalk improvements made to applicant’s frontage through the City’s Capital Improvement Program. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. 493 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 8 of 27 b. A deceleration/right turn only lane serving the entrances to the project as approved by the City Engineer c. 12-foot wide landscaped median along the entire boundary of the project plus variable width as needed to accommodate for a left turn lane into the easterly Avenue 50 project entry and for a left turn lane for eastbound Avenue 50 traffic at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street as approved by the City Engineer. d. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer e. 6-foot wide sidewalk—The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include a non-curb adjacent 6-foot wide sidewalk along Avenue 50 at a minimum distance of 4 feet from the street curb. The site plan and landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Manager prior to construction. f. The applicant is responsible for the cost to design and install dual eastbound left turn lanes to northbound Jefferson Street when determined by the City Engineer and a traffic study prepared for the applicant per Engineering Bulletin #06-13 that the left-turn volumes cannot be adequately served by the single left-turn lane. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post separate security for the cost to design and install the dual eastbound left turn lanes. This obligation will remain in effect for 10 years after recordation of the final map unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 3) Jefferson Street/Avenue 50 Intersection: All necessary traffic signal modifications in the northwest quadrant of the intersection and any other modifications warranted by the timing and traffic generation of this development. 494 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 9 of 27 4) Other required improvements in the right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 26. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Jefferson Street (northerly): Right turn in, right turn out, and left turn in movements are permitted. Left turn out movements are prohibited. Jefferson Street (southerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (westerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (easterly): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. 27. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 28. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. 495 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 10 of 27 C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 29. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6” P.C.C./4” c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design 496 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 11 of 27 gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 31. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid-block street lighting is not required. 32. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 33. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 34. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Design and Development Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On-Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal D. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. 497 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 12 of 27 E. Off-Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical F. Off-Site Signing & Striping Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal The Off-Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On Site Sewer and Water Improvement Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal H. On-Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical I. On-Site Precise Grading Plan 1” = 30’ Horizontal (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off-Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Design and Development Department. “Rough Grading” plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & 498 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 13 of 27 gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 35. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the “Plans, Notes and Design Guidance” section of the Public Works Development Division at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Design and Development Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 36. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the mylars of all approved improvement plans acceptable to the City Engineer. 37. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 38. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off-site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 39. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 499 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 14 of 27 40. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 41. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 42. When improvements are phased through a “Phasing Plan,” or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off-site improvements and common on-site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the commercial center proceeds in phases, the first phase of development shall include the construction and completion of the Anchor tenant building and associated fuel center, Shop 1, project landscaping and parking areas. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 43. Depending on the timing of the development of this Site Development Permit, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. 500 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 15 of 27 B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Site Development Permit. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off-Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off-Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20% Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 44. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on-site and off-site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant’s detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 45. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 501 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 16 of 27 46. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 47. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 48. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 49. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 502 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 17 of 27 50. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 51. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 52. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 53. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 54. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit Site Plan, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance finding review. 55. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 503 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 18 of 27 DRAINAGE 56. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Pavilions Plaza Commercial Development project (TPM37370 and SDP2017-0009), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 57. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06- 16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 58. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 59. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 60. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 61. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 62. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side 504 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 19 of 27 slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 63. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 64. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 65. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 66. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 67. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs 505 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 20 of 27 utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 68. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 69. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 70. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 71. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 72. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly-maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. 506 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 21 of 27 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 73. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 74. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 75. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 76. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Commission for their approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Sections 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) and 9.150.080 (Parking Facility Design Standards). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property. Security lighting along the west elevation of the anchor building shall be installed below 20 ft. in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property and not shine directly onto neighboring residences. Any illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 77. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 78. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 79. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Commission approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit. 507 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 22 of 27 NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 80. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 81. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. 82. Applicant/Developer shall install paving patterns, such as stamped concrete or decorative colored pavers, to delineate and differentiate pedestrian-oriented areas throughout the project from the vehicular circulation, parking areas, ingress and egress, to minimize conflicts between pedestrian and vehicle traffic. Paving patterns shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. PUBLIC SERVICES 83. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 84. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 85. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 86. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 508 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 23 of 27 FIRE DEPARTMENT 87. Fire Hydrants and Fire Flow: Applicant and/or developer shall separately provide one copy of off-site water system plans detailing existing/proposed fire hydrant(s) and main(s) capable of delivering the minimum fire flow, per CFC Appendix B Table B105.1, within 400 feet to all portions around the proposed structure(s). Minimum fire hydrant location and spacing shall comply with the CFC and NFPA 24. Reference current California Fire Code (CFC) 507.5.1. Plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer and/or water purveyor prior to Fire Marshal review and approval. Mylar will be signed by the Fire Marshal after review and approval. A. Transportation hydrants shall be added to Jefferson and Avenue 50 in compliance with CFC Appendix C Table C102.1 for the frontage of the project. 88. Fire Department Access: Provide a site plan for fire apparatus access roads and signage. Access roads shall be provided to within 150 feet to all portions of all buildings and shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet. The construction of the access roads shall be all weather and capable of sustaining 60,000 lbs. over two axels for commercial developments. Ref. CFC 503.1.1 and 503.2.1 as amended by the City of La Quinta. 89. Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Ref. CFC 503.4.1 90. Grading Permit Fire Department Review: Submittal to the Office of the Fire Marshal for Precise Grading Permit will be required. 91. Construction Permits Fire Department Review: Submittal of construction plans to the Office of the Fire Marshal for development, construction, installation and operational use permitting will be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Office of the Fire Marshal reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code, and related codes, which are in effect at the time of building plan submittal. 92. Phased Construction Access: If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access for fire protection prior to any construction. Ref. 509 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 24 of 27 CFC 503.1 93. Fire Sprinkler System: All new commercial structures 3,600 square feet or larger will be required to install a fire sprinkler system. Ref. CFC 903.2 as amended by the City of La Quinta. 94. Fire Alarm and Detection System: A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required and determined at time of building plan review. Ref. CFC 903.4, CFC 907.2 and NFPA 72 95. Knox Box and Gate Access: Buildings shall be provided with a Knox Box. The Knox Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. All electronically operated gates shall be provided with Knox key switches and automatic sensors for access. Ref. CFC 506.1 96. Addressing: All commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side and additional locations as required. Ref. CFC 505.1 and County of Riverside Office of the Fire Marshal Standard #07-01 97. Landscape clearances: A minimum 3-feet radius clear of vegetation shall be maintained around fire protection equipment, valves and services requiring access. This includes Backflow Valves, Post-Indicator Valves, Fire Department Connections, Fire Hydrants, etc. 98. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Systems: Projects that do not meet the exceptions set forth by the Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal shall provide plans for an emergency responder radio coverage system. Ref. CFC 510.1 and Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Technical Policy #TP19-002 BUILDING DIVISION 99. Building Plans prepared for permitting shall meet applicable California Building Codes effective at the time of submittal. 100. Any building, structure, facility, complex or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public shall be provided barrier free design to ensure that these improvements are accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities. Plans shall fully detail how the proposed facility complies with the California Accessibility Standards 510 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 25 of 27 defined in Title 24 Chapter 11B and Federal ADA Regulations. MISCELLANEOUS 101. Representatives from tribes within the project vicinity commented and have requested the following considerations: A. The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be onsite during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). B. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 102. The County Coroner shall be contacted if human remains are identified during earthmoving activities. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted. The NAHC will make a determination of the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). The City and the landowner will work with the designated MLD to determine the final disposition of the remains. 103. No signage is permitted with this approval. A separate permit from the Design and Development Department is required for any temporary or permanent signs. 104. The applicant shall submit exhibits to the Planning Manager and City Engineer that demonstrate vehicles can turn into approved drive aisles for drive through facilities in one continuous movement prior to precise grading plan approval. The applicant shall modify drive aisle entries for drive through facilities on precise grading and building construction plans if the Planning Manager and City Engineer determine such modifications are necessary to accommodate vehicles turning into drive aisles. 105. The applicant shall install a transition for the eastbound Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street left turn lane that separates the turn lane from the left turn lane into the shopping center from eastbound Avenue 50. This transition will keep the left turn queue for Jefferson Street from 511 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 26 of 27 backing up into the median break for the shopping center full turn movement. 106. Applicant/Developer shall add metal louvres as a decorative element to the fuel center canopy consistent with the architecture of the convenience store building. The metal louvres shall be reviewed and approved during building plan check. 107. The size of Building 7 shall be no larger than 825 square feet and shall not include the sale of alcoholic beverages. 108. Public Art shall be dedicated on the project site or the Applicant/Developer shall pay a development fee pursuant to the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 2.65 Art in Public Places. 109. All vacant pads shall be planted with drought tolerant landscaping and decomposed granite and shall include fencing as appropriate so long as they are vacant. The installation of all landscaping and decomposed granite, and fencing as appropriate, shall be completed prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy of the Pavilions store. Any landscaping on vacant pads shall be irrigated and maintained regularly. The final landscape plan for the project shall include plans for fencing, landscaping, irrigation (as applicable), and maintenance for vacant pads. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. 110. The applicant shall add shade features and seating to the interior corner plaza areas and shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. 111. The project sign program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. 112. The height of parking lot lighting shall not exceed 20 feet and shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. 113. The applicant shall install a minimum of 12 electric vehicle charging facilities in the anchor tenant’s parking lot on an accessible route per CBC 11B-228.3. Any future electric vehicle charging facilities in addition to these 12 shall be designed on an accessible route to facilitate compliance once they are installed. 512 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 27 of 27 114.The landscape architect shall identify standards for planting, irrigation and maintenance in the final landscape plan and the standards shall be included in Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which shall be recorded on the Property and shall be reviewed and approved by the City. 115.Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store, applicant shall record Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) on the Property. The CC&Rs shall (1) require minimum covenants for satisfactory, perpetual maintenance obligations on the Property; (2) name the City of La Quinta as an express third party beneficiary; (3) be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation; and (4) state that the CC&Rs cannot be amended without prior written consent of the City. 116.Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store, applicant shall execute and record a maintenance agreement with the Renaissance HOA and the Palmilla HOA. The agreement shall (1) be imposed as an equitable servitude on the Property (2) require satisfactory, perpetual maintenance of the Property, (3) name the City as an express third party beneficiary; (4) be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation; and (5) state that the maintenance agreement cannot be amended without prior written consent of the City. If the applicant shows substantial evidence that the Renaissance and Palmilla HOA’s are not negotiating in good faith, the applicant may provide the evidence to the Design and Development Department and request removal of this condition. 513 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 1 of 22 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Parcel Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Parcel Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the “Subdivision Map Act”), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (“LQMC”). 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required:  Riverside County Fire Marshal  La Quinta Development Services Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit)  La Quinta Planning Division  Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department  Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD)  Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)  Imperial Irrigation District (IID)  California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)  State Water Resources Control Board  SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine)  South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 514 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 2 of 22 4. Coverage under the State of California General Construction Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. 515 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 3 of 22 D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required. 6. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned 516 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 4 of 22 requirements in the CC&R’s for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit and execute an “AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY” form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 10. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 11. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 12. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – 64 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 128-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – 54 feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 for a total 108-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 13. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1” equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line 517 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 5 of 22 alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 14. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights-of- way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 15. The applicant shall create minimum perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights-of-way as follows: A. Jefferson Street - 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 50 - 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately-owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 17. Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative parcel map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map. 18. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other 518 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 6 of 22 encroachments will occur. 19. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 20. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. 21. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 22. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) a. Widen the west side of the street along frontage as necessary in order to accommodate deceleration/right turn only lanes serving the two entrances to the project. b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide the left turn in with physical left turn out restriction and restore the median landscaping. c. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer d. Reconstruct sidewalk improvements as needed and applicant to reimburse City for sidewalk improvements made to applicant’s frontage through the City’s Capital 519 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 7 of 22 Improvement Program. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. A deceleration/right turn only lane serving the entrances to the project as approved by the City Engineer c. 12-foot wide landscaped median along the entire boundary of the project plus variable width as needed to accommodate for a left turn lane into the easterly Avenue 50 project entry and for a left turn lane for eastbound Avenue 50 traffic at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street as approved by the City Engineer. d. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer e. 6-foot wide sidewalk—The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include a non-curb adjacent 6-foot wide sidewalk along Avenue 50 at a minimum distance of 4 feet from the street curb. The site plan and landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Manager prior to construction. f. The applicant is responsible for the cost to design and install dual eastbound left turn lanes to northbound Jefferson Street when determined by the City Engineer and a traffic study prepared for the applicant per Engineering Bulletin #06-13 that the left-turn volumes cannot be adequately served by the single left-turn 520 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 8 of 22 lane. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post separate security for the cost to design and install the dual eastbound left turn lanes. This obligation will remain in effect for 10 years after recordation of the final map unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 3) Jefferson Street/Avenue 50 Intersection: All necessary traffic signal modifications in the northwest quadrant of the intersection and any other modifications warranted by the timing and traffic generation of this development. 4) Other required improvements in the right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 23. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Jefferson Street (northerly): Right turn in, right turn out, and left turn in movements are permitted. Left turn out movements are prohibited. Jefferson Street (southerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (westerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (easterly): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. 24. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall install a transition for the eastbound Avenue 50 to 521 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 9 of 22 northbound Jefferson Street left turn lane that separates the turn lane from the left turn lane into the shopping center from eastbound Avenue 50. This transition will keep the left turn queue for Jefferson Street from backing up into the median break for the shopping center full turn movement. FINAL MAPS 26. Prior to the City’s approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. The Final Map shall be 1” = 40’ scale. PARKING and ACCESS POINTS 27. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may 522 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 10 of 22 require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 28. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6” P.C.C./4” c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 29. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid-block street lighting is not required. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 32. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply 523 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 11 of 22 with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 33. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Division. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On-Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal D. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. Off-Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical F. Off-Site Signing & Striping Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal The Off-Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On Site Sewer and Water Improvement Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal H. On-Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical I. On-Site Precise Grading Plan 1” = 30’ Horizontal (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) 524 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 12 of 22 Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off-Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. “Rough Grading” plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. The applicant shall prepare an accessibility assessment on a marked up print of the building floor plan identifying every building egress and notes the 2016 California Building Code accessibility requirements associated with each door. The assessment must comply with submittal requirements of the Building & Safety Division. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 34. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the “Plans, Notes and Design Guidance” section of the Design and Development Department at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Design and Development Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 35. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 525 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 13 of 22 36. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 37. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off-site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 38. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 39. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 40. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 41. When improvements are phased through a “Phasing Plan,” or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off-site 526 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 14 of 22 improvements and common on-site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 42. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Parcel Map, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Tentative Parcel Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off-Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off-Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20% Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of 527 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 15 of 22 the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 43. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on-site and off-site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant’s detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 44. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 45. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 46. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 47. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and 528 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 16 of 22 D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A WQMP prepared by an appropriate professional registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 48. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 49. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 50. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 529 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 17 of 22 51. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 52. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 53. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 54. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 55. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Pavilions Plaza Commercial Development project (TPM37370 and SDP2017-0009), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 56. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06- 16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 530 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 18 of 22 57. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 58. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 59. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 60. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 61. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 62. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 63. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 64. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 65. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream 531 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 19 of 22 drainage relief route. 66. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 67. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 68. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 69. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed 532 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 20 of 22 development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 70. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 71. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly-maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 72. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 73. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 74. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 75. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Commission for their approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) and 9.150.080 (Parking Facility Design Standards). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height and shall be 533 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 21 of 22 shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property. Security lighting along the west elevation of the anchor building shall be installed below 20 ft. in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property and not shine directly onto neighboring residences. Any illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 76. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 77. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 78. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Commission approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 79. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 80. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. 81. All vacant pads shall be planted with drought tolerant landscaping and decomposed granite and shall include fencing as appropriate so long as they are vacant. The installation of all landscaping and decomposed granite, and fencing as appropriate, shall be completed prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy of the Pavilions store. Any landscaping on vacant pads shall be irrigated and maintained regularly. 534 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020-XXX – “EXHIBIT D” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: Page 22 of 22 The final landscape plan for the project shall include plans for fencing, landscaping, irrigation (as applicable), and maintenance for vacant pads. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. PUBLIC SERVICES 82. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 83. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 84. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 85. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 535 ATTACHMENT 1 536 Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan Amendment #2 La Quinta, CA Original Approval: Specific Plan No. 98-034 La Quinta City Council Resolution 99-63, Adopted May 18, 1999 Amendment No. 1 - 98-034 Amended Adopted September 19, 2002 Amendment No. 2 Adopted _______ Applicant Lundin Development Company 16400 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 207 Huntington Beach, California 92649 Preparer: Jericho Systems, Inc. 47 N. First Street, 1st Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 307-5633 Amendment #2 Prepared March 2018; Updated November 2020 537 City of La Quinta Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Relationship to the General Plan.................................................................... 6 1.1.2 Relationship to Zoning ................................................................................... 7 1.2 Specific Plan Summary .............................................................................................. 8 1.2.1 Project Summary ............................................................................................ 8 1.2.2 Project Objectives .......................................................................................... 8 1.2.3 Project Characteristics ................................................................................... 8 1.2.4 Master Design Theme .................................................................................... 9 2 MASTER PLAN .................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Project Description................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Grading .................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Undeveloped Land ....................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Flood Protection ........................................................................................... 11 2.3 Drainage ................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Drainage Plan Description ........................................................................... 11 2.4 Water ........................................................................................................................ 15 2.4.1 Water Service Description ........................................................................... 15 2.5 Sewage Disposal ...................................................................................................... 15 2.5.1 Sewer Service Description ........................................................................... 15 2.6 Utilities ..................................................................................................................... 16 2.6.1 Existing Utilities .......................................................................................... 16 2.6.2 Underground Utilities .................................................................................. 16 2.7 Circulation................................................................................................................ 16 2.7.1 Project Area Background ............................................................................. 16 2.7.2 Circulation Description ................................................................................ 16 2.7.3 Public Transportation ................................................................................... 17 2.7.4 Street and Traffic Improvements ................................................................. 17 2.7.5 On-Site Traffic Circulation Plan ................................................................. 19 2.7.6 Construction/Financing of Improvements 
 ................................................ 20 2.8 Signage ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.9 Landscape Concept .................................................................................................. 21 2.9.1 Development Standards ............................................................................... 22 2.10 Maintenance of the Shopping Center ....................................................................... 23 3 SPECIFIC PLAN ................................................................................................................ 25 3.1 Land Use .................................................................................................................. 25 3.2 Cultural/Archaeology ............................................................................................... 25 3.2.1 Tribal Consultation, SB18 and AB52 .......................................................... 26 3.3 Paleontology ............................................................................................................ 26 3.4 Environmental .......................................................................................................... 27 3.4.1 Air Quality ................................................................................................... 27 3.4.2 Greenhouse Gas ........................................................................................... 28 3.4.3 Noise ............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.4 Trash Recycling ........................................................................................... 29 3.5 Zoning ...................................................................................................................... 29 538 City of La Quinta Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Page iii 3.5.1 Zoning Standards ......................................................................................... 29 3.5.2 Deviations from Zoning Code ..................................................................... 29 3.5.3 Permitted Uses ............................................................................................. 32 3.6 Specific Design Features.......................................................................................... 33 3.6.1 Screen Wall .................................................................................................. 33 3.6.2 Screening of Rooftop Equipment................................................................. 33 3.6.3 Utility Enclosures......................................................................................... 34 3.6.4 Cart Storage ................................................................................................. 34 3.6.5 Exterior Lighting .......................................................................................... 34 3.7 Property Rights ........................................................................................................ 34 3.8 Administration ......................................................................................................... 35 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Plan November 2020 Figure 2 – Colored Site Plan November 2020 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 – Lighting Plan Attachment 2 – Preliminary Landscape Plans Attachment 3 – Preliminary Grading Plans Attachment 4 – Building Elevations Attachment 54 – Conditions of Approval 539 City of La Quinta Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Page i Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center (Project renamed) CITY OF LA QUINTA City of La Quinta, PO Box 1504, La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 City Council Linda Evans, Mayor Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Mayor Pro Tem John Peña, Council Member Robert Radi, Council Member Steve Sanchez, Council Member Planning Commission Mary Caldwell (Chair) Michael Proctor (Vice Chair) Stephen Nieto, Commissioner Kevin McCune, Commissioner Taylor Libolt Varner, Commissioner Philip Bettencourt, Commissioner Loretta Currie, Commissioner City Staff Jon Millen, City Manager Danny Castro, Design and Development Director 540 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Page ii Insert site plan Figure 1 Site Plan EXHIBIT REPLACED IN AMENDMENT NO. 2 541 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Page iii 542 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Page iv 543 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 5 This Amendment 2 supersedes Amendment 1 1 SUMMARY In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved the Rancho Cielo Shopping Center Specific Plan and associated parcel map, proposed by Lundin Development. The Specific Plan identified the development of 111,000 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center with an associated fuel center and adjacent pads for retail and restaurant uses on 12.5 acres at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue. The parcel is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The Specific Plan approval included the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In 2002, an amendment to the Specific Plan (renamed to Fairway Plaza Shopping Center) was adopted that identified approximately 100,460 square feet of grocery store/pharmacy with fuel center and adjacent retail and restaurant uses. To date, Lundin Development has yet to construct the Project. On February 19. 2013, the City of La Quinta adopted the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its 2035 General Plan (SCH# 2010111094) which included the impacts of adding to commercial uses within the City, including the approved Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was also adopted for environmental impacts that could not be mitigated to a level below significance for: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic (Resolution 2013-009). In 2018, the Lundin Development requested Amendment No. 2 to the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan to construct 125,800 square feet of grocery store/pharmacy with fuel center and adjacent retail and restaurant uses. The Project under Amendment 2 will occur on the same 12.5-acre site at the corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue, within the same area of the previously-approved Specific Plan, with uses similar to that which were already identified. Highlights of Amendment No. 2 include the following: • Renames “The Fairway Plaza Shopping Center” to the “The Pavilion Palms Shopping Center”; • Adds up to 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses similar to that which was previously approved.; • The supermarket anchor tenant has changed from Albertsons to Pavilions; • Eliminates references to components of the Project that have already been constructed between 1999 to date (i.e., such as the retaining wall between the commercial parcel and residential area and the requirement for a retention basin for residential area, both of which have been constructed); • Identifies changes in ingress/egress (i.e., two driveways in Avenue 50 instead of one, and the elimination of the access from Derek Alan Drive); • Stormwater will be managed by an underground system, instead of open retention basins. • The architectural components have been revised from Spanish/Mediterranean to Contemporary;. 544 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 6 • The architectural components along the frontage of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street, which are designated City Image Corridors, include varying building heights and strategically placed tilted rooflines to create an iconic statement as a gateway treatment; • Increases landscaping to provide 70 percent shading which exceeds the minimum 50 percent identified in Amendment 1 and exceeds the minimum per the City requirements; • Incorporates shaded gathering spaces and patio areas; 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 is to provide an overview and analysis of the proposed Project for the property located at the northwest corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street. The subject site in this report shall be referred to as the "Fairway Plaza Shopping Center." Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. Additionally, this document augments the City's Zoning Code in terms of establishing permitted uses and setting forth particular design guidelines and development standards that are unique to the developer and anchor tenant.. It should be noted that where this document is silent on any matter, the City's Zoning Code shall apply. The Conditions of Approval as approved for the original Specific Plan by the City of La Quinta are contained within Appendix "A" and as approved development standards, are incorporated by reference. 1.1.1 Relationship to the General Plan The development of the Fairway PlazaPavilion Palms Shopping Center will be implemented to carry out the goals and policies contained in the General Plan. All development within this Project will be consistent with the provisions of the CC ("Community GC ("General Commercial") General Plan designation. Among the important provisions of the General Plan, which will be implemented upon the development of this Project, are the following: Land Use The proposed Project is consistent with the CCGC General Plan designation for this site. The floor area ratio (“FAR”), which describes the average building floor area to net site area is 0.187, or 18.72%. The Project represents approximately 0.23 FAR ([Floor Area Ratio] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area) 23 percent, which is consistent with the CC Zoning designation of 0.30 Maximum FAR. Tenants will include a grocery supermarket, drug store with pharmacy and associated fuel center, retail shops, drive-thruand restaurants, professional services and office uses, and an automobile with drive-through service station. These uses are consistent with those outlined for the CommunityGeneral Commercial designation. Additionally, walking, bicycling, and public transit will be encouraged by the design features of this Project. 545 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 7 Circulation The Circulation Element of the General Plan outlines the design and location of required street improvements to complete the transportation system in the City of La Quinta. The Fairway PlazaPavilion Palms Shopping Center will widen and/or improve adjacent portions of both Jefferson Street, a major arterial, and Avenue 50, a primary arterial, according to General Plan standards. Roadway Image Corridors In addition to roadway improvements, the Project will implement special roadway corridor improvements consistent with the unique character that the City of La Quinta requires. Improvements will include pedestrian walks, street name signs, and landscaping consistent with the themes suggested by the General Plan. 50th Avenue, being a secondary image corridor, will incorporate the appearance of low profile, indigenous canopyscreening type trees, limiting palm trees to node areas (i.e. main entries and street intersections). Building fronts along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, being image corridors, will incorporate thedesign features that include varying roof heights, tilted roofs, and the use of colors and materials to create an iconic gateway treatment. appearance of screening type trees and shrubs. Water Quantity and Quality This Specific Plan outlines the use of drought tolerant planting and irrigation techniques and incorporates a grading concept designed to retain storm water on-site as required by the City of La Quinta as per Condition No. 23 of the original Conditions of Approval of this Specific Plan. The Project is subject to regional and local regulations, including the need for an SWPPP under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES No. CAR000002). In addition, the City requires a grading permit for all developments that would require grading. Compliance with SWRCB’s General Construction Activity Stormwater Permit regulations requiring a SWPPP, and the grading permit required by the City would ensure water quality standards are not exceeded. The Project will create an impermeable surface over much of the entire site when complete. This can increase the potential for pollutants to occur in surface water primarily be from cars parked in the parking lot leaking fluids. However, the Project includes an underground system to collect all of the stormwater runoff from the Project site. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is proposed to be developed for the Project that will identify Best Management Practices for maintenance of the system. 1.1.2 Relationship to Zoning The development of this Project will be consistent with the purpose and intent of the Community Commercial zone. As stated above, this document augments the City's Zoning Code in establishing permitted uses and setting forth particular design guidelines and development standards that are 546 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 8 unique to the developer and anchor tenant.. It should be noted that where this document is silent on any matter, the City's Zoning Code shall apply. As noted above in Section 1.1, the original Conditions of Approval as approved for this Specific Plan are contained within Appendix "A" and are incorporated by reference. For further discussion of zoning see Section 3.5 of this Specific Plan. 1.2 Specific Plan Summary 1.2.1 Project Summary The proposed Fairway PlazaPavilion Palms Shopping Center Project is a 12.5 -acre site located at the northwest corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street. This site is immediately adjacent to the City limits of the City of Indio and will provide approximately 100,460 up to 124,990 square feet of retailmixed-use commercial space with accommodating parking and landscaping areas. The Pavilion Palms Shopping Center will widen and/or improve adjacent portions of both Jefferson Street, a major arterial, and Avenue 50, a primary arterial, according to General Plan standards. The Project will implement special roadway corridor improvements consistent with the unique character that the City of La Quinta requires. Improvements will include pedestrian walks, street name signs, and landscaping consistent with the themes suggested by the General Plan. Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, being image corridors, will incorporate an iconic gateway treatment with varied roof heights and tilted rooflines. 1.2.2 Project Objectives This Project has been developed to provide retail and commercial space that will be easily available to the majority of people in the eastern and central Coachella Valley. The Project will provide additional retail shopping facilities, drive-thru restaurants, and a service station that in addition to accommodating La Quinta residents, will also serve the needs of residents from Palm Desert, Bermuda Dunes, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Indio, and beyond. 1.2.3 Project Characteristics Based on additional preliminary studies of the Fairway PlazaPavilion Palms Shopping Center Project, the following conclusions have been drawn: • The site has unencumbered direct access via Jefferson Street, from Interstate 10 to Avenue 50. • The subject parcel, located on a corner, draws special advantages with direct access to both Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street as arterials. • Both the required zoning and general plan designation allow for this development on this site. 547 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 9 • This Project will place a commercial development of a viable size which could be absorbed by the area market located near the perimeters of the City of La Quinta, thus providing the City the opportunity to additionally draw from the greater Indio market area with its concentration of stable, year-round resident families. 
 1.2.4 Master Design Theme La Quinta includes a mixture of building types built over various time periods, and with a variety of architectural styles. Development includes structures built in the early twentieth century, and new master-planned communities built within the last decade. Architectural styles include those typical of Spanish Colonial, Mediterranean, Tuscan, and Modern styles. Spanish Colonial architecture is the most prevalent style used in La Quinta, and examples include the La Quinta Resort & Spa and Old Towne in the Village. The Fairway PlazaPavilion Palms Shopping Center is designed in a traditional Spanish Mediterranean architectural style using arched colonnades with tile roofsContemporary style that will generally utilize traditional materials such as glass, wood, brick, and various metals. Additional architectural elements such as textured finishes, roundels, accent tile and raised trellises will be used to provide further details and interest, thus further enhancing the individual buildings and the quality appearance of the shopping center in general. The landscaped setbacks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street will incorporate meandering sidewalks with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access as well as landscaping that will include a variety of trees, shrubs and flowers, which accompanied by the parking lot landscaping, should provide an inviting atmosphere to draw shoppers to the center. 548 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 10 2 MASTER PLAN 2.1 Project Description The Fairway Plaza Shopping Center will provide approximately 100,460 square feet of restaurant/retail commercial space when complete. The project consists of one combination grocery store/pharmacy, "Albertsons"/”Sav-On", as the major anchor, with 57,560 square feet. Albertsons will combine the sale of groceries with the off-sale of beer, wine and hard liquor, and a drive thru pharmacy. There are also seven other proposed retail buildings ranging from 2,200 to 8,500 square feet each. These will contain a variety of retail uses including two drive-thru restaurants and an automobile service station and possibly a car wash. (The developer understands that a Conditional Use Permit will be necessary for the automobile service station). Parking for at least 474 cars, including compact and handicap spaces will be provided. The Pavilion Palms Shopping Center will provide approximately up to 125,800 square feet of restaurant/retail commercial space when complete. The Project will be anchored by Pavilions grocery store with a pharmacy that will occupy 63,000 square feet. Additionally, 12 other buildings, each ranging from 3,000 to 11,700 square feet, will be occupied by restaurants, banks, and retail units, as well as a fuel center/convenience market that is associated with the Pavilions. Parking includes 532 stalls, which includes compact and handicap spaces and shall include a minimum of 12 electric vehicle charging stations. 2.2 Grading The grading plan will conform to the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. The grading plan will conform to the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared for the site in 1998 and updated in 2017 (Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017). The site is relatively flat and contains sparse desert scrub. Soil balancing will be used during grading so that there will be no soil import or export. The desert scrub brush on site will be removed or buried depending on size and type. 2.2.1 Undeveloped Land Graded, undeveloped portions of the site anticipating future construction will be maintained to prevent dust and blows and nuisances. These undeveloped portions of the site shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures approved by the Design and Development Department. Community Development and Public Works Departments. As per Condition No. 22 of the original Conditions of Approval for this Specific Plan, prior to occupation of the Project site for construction purposes, the applicant will provide for City approval a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, and the applicant will furnish security to the City in a form deemed acceptable to the City, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 549 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 11 Vacant undeveloped pads shall be planted with drought tolerant landscaping and/or decomposed granite. and shall include fencing as appropriate so long as they are vacant. Landscaping on vacant pads shall be irrigated and maintained regularly. The final landscape plan for the project shall include plans for fencing, landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance for vacant pads. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. 2.2.2 Flood Protection According to the August 19, 1991 Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA"), this Project site is not located within a designated flood hazard zone. 2.3 Drainage 2.3.1 Drainage Plan Description Project site is situated on the north side of Avenue 50 and west of Jefferson Street. The southeast portionentire parcel is generally flat with the remainder of the parcel consisting of natural and man- made, graded dunes. The topography is, slightly irregular, with a general gradient sloping to the south and the east. The storm water runoff from the parking area will generally sheet flow to the east and the southeast. The points of flow concentration will be picked up in the future underground storm drain system that will terminate in an on-site retention basins.,.underground storage system. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. Storm water falling on site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the right-of-way of the adjacent public streets. Flows in excess capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet to the historic drainage relief route. 550 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 12 551 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 13 Slopes shall not exceed 3:1 within the basin or the landscape area unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Retention facility design was based on an extensive drainage study performed by Warner Engineering. The purpose of this study was to model the 100-year, 1, 3, 6, and 24-hour events, then route the flows to retention basins using the City's required percolation rate. The event generating the greatest water volume was used as the design for onsite retention basins. Criteria for the study was based on the Hydrology Manual of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District manual and the City of La Quinta standards. 2.3.2 Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan (see accompanying exhibit) 2.3.3 Typical Section of Retention Basin (see accompanying exhibit) 552 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan February 19, 2002 553 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 15 2.4 Water 2.4.1 Water Service Description Based on preliminary discussions with the Coachella Valley Water District ("CVWD"), this development will take water service from an 18-inch water main located in Avenue 50. The water main comes through Tract No. 29858 and terminates in Avenue 50 approximately 250-300 feet west of Jefferson Street. CVWD has required that an 18-inch water main be constructed in Avenue 50 along the project frontage. Installation of a 24-inch main in Jefferson Street along the project frontage will also be required, terminating at the north boundary of the site. The timing for completion of this 24-inch water system for Jefferson Street will depend upon future developments as they are proposed, and will provide a backup water supply for this project at that time. Water service will be provided by CVWD via an 18-inch water in Avenue 50 and a 24-inch main in Jefferson Street. The CVWD reviewed the Project and identified that it could serve the Project with the existing water and entitlements (CVWD, October 5, 2017). The CVWD identified that the Project lies within the study area of the 2010 Water Management Plan Update. The CVWD identified that the groundwater basin in the Coachella Valley is in a state of overdraft, and each new development contributes incrementally to the overdraft. CVWD identified that its Water Management Plan is in place to reduce overdraft and identifies specific actions for reducing overdraft. The CVWD identified that the Project must comply with elements and actions described in the plan. 2.5 Sewage Disposal 2.5.1 Sewer Service Description Based on discussions with CVWD, this development will connect to a proposed sewer main in Avenue 50. If that main is not yet available when this development is constructed, the developer will construct or participate in the construction of a temporary connection to an existing sewer main located in the Citrus development, approximately one quarter mile south of Avenue 50. Based on discussions with CVWD, this development will connect to an existing trunk line that runs through the site. 554 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 16 2.6 Utilities 2.6.1 Existing Utilities To ensure optimum placement for aesthetic, as well as, practical purposes, the developer shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all above-ground utility structures, including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves and telephone stands. 2.6.2 Underground Utilities In areas where hardscape surface improvements are planned, underground utilities shall be installed prior to construction of surface improvements. The developer shall provide certified reports of utility trench compaction tests for approval of the Public Works Director. 2.7 Circulation 2.7.1 Project Area Background Being located at the northwest corner of the Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street intersection, the Project site serves a central location as an important link, via Jefferson, from Interstate 10 to southwest Indio and the City of La Quinta. The Coachella Valley Association of Governments ("CVAG") in conjunction with the City of La Quinta is currently in the process of redesigning Jefferson Street to the ultimate 120-foot wide right-of-way. Widening work is anticipated to precede the development of the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center. 2.7.2 Circulation Description In accordance with the City of La Quinta design policies, and as shown on the Off-Site Traffic Circulation Plan Exhibit, the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center is proposing the following circulation pattern: Major customer traffic access will be via two primary access points located approximately 610 feet to the west of the intersection at Avenue 50/Jefferson Street on Avenue 50, and 620 feet to the north of the Avenue 50/Jefferson Street intersection on Jefferson Street. An additional driveway allowing only right turn-in and right turn-out movements will also be provided on both Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. In addition to the above access directly into the shopping center, the entry off of Jefferson Street into the future residential subdivision, which will be to the north and west of the commercial center, will also allow for entry to the shopping center. For all driveways leading from streets, the adjacent perpendicular drive aisle closest to the street shall be provided with stop signs. Additionally, the driveways leading to the street shall be provided with stop signs which will insure inbound traffic a continuous, uninterrupted flow into the parking lot. Two (2) additional approaches have been added as part of this Specific Plan Amendment. The revised building layout reflects the addition of two approaches on the Avenue 50 frontage, one to serve Parcels 1 and 2 directly (with a deceleration lane, right turn in and right turn out) and a one- 555 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 17 way exit (right turn out only) located on the far west side of Parcel 1 for emergency vehicles only. The previous layout would have relied excessively on the approach situated immediately east of Parcel 2. The revised layout helps relieve this problem by reducing the concentration of traffic from the single driveway. This arrangement also accommodates the concerns of the Fire Department by creating an exit- only drive to accommodate oversized fire vehicles. Furthermore, the previous layout had insufficient turning radii, which would have obstructed the ability of responding fire vehicles to maneuver on the site, especially when exiting the parking lot. The previously approved Fairway Specific Plan identified four access points: two from Jefferson Street, one from Avenue 50 and one from Derek Alan Drive. This Specific Plan amendment revises the site access plan to four driveways: three limited-access (no left-turns out) driveways and one full-access unsignalized driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 440 feet west of the center line of the Jefferson Street signalized intersection. The access from Derek Alan Drive has been eliminated in this current plan. Stop signs will be provided within the interior parking lanes at the intersections with the major through lanes and at the driveway intersections with Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street. This will ensure inbound traffic has a continuous, uninterrupted flow into the parking lot. It should be noted that the one driveway into the shopping center from Derek Alan Drive, as previously identified on the previously-approved Fairway Specific Plan, has been removed with this current proposed Amendment No. 2. The previously-approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan had included a driveway from Derek Alan Drive to the shopping center as a convenience to the residents in the residential development. However, due to resident concerns regarding unwanted traffic in the neighborhood after the residential development was constructed, the driveway access from Derek Alan Drive has been eliminated from the “Pavilion Palms” Project as amended. 2.7.3 Public Transportation Bus waiting shelters shall be provided as required when street improvements are installed, as approved by Sunline Transit and the Public Works Director. The SunLine transit agency provides bus service in the region. However, SunLine currently provides no service within proximity to the Project site, and the closest bus stop is located approximately 1.5 miles from the Project, at Washington and Avenue 50. The Project includes non-meandering sidewalks along the perimeter, and interior sidewalks offer ADA-compliant access to the perimeter sidewalks. Therefore, the Project can accommodate transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the future. 2.7.4 Street and Traffic Improvements 2.7.4.1 Minimum Street Improvements The developer will be responsible for the following street improvements: • Jefferson Street - Major Arterial: 556 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 18 51 feet of southbound travel improvements accommodating half of a raised landscaped median, three traffic lanes with widths of 12, 13, and 14 feet, a 5-foot bike lane, and a sidewalk. • Jefferson Street – a sidewalk and minor relocation of the existing “pork chop” left turn median that serves the existing Ralph’s shopping center east of Jefferson Street as well as the Pavilions Palms Shopping Center. • Avenue 50 - Primary Arterial: 38 feet of westbound improvements accommodating half of a raised landscaped median, two through traffic lanes, left turn stacking and a 5'deceleration lane, a 5-foot bike lane and a sidewalk. 
 • Traffic Signals: Jefferson Street Uat Avenue 50 - All necessary traffic signal modifications in the northwest quadrant of the intersection and any other modifications warranted by the timing and traffic generation of this development. • Bus turnouts, acceleration/deceleration lanes, and/or other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths, raised medians or other mitigation measures as determined by the Public Works Director. The Public Works Director may require improvements extending beyond development boundaries such as, but not limited to, pavement elevation transitions, street width transitions, or other incidental work which will ensure that newly constructed improvements are safely integrated with existing improvements and conform with the City's standards and practices. 
 2.7.4.2 Access Points Access points and turning movements of traffic shall be restricted as follows: • Avenue 50 - One 30-foot wide right-in/right-out drive centered approximately 406 feet west of the centerline of Jefferson Street and one 40-foot wide right-in/right-out drive, which also allows a left turn into the project, centered approximately 610 feet west of the centerline of Jefferson Street, or as approved by the City Engineer. In addition to these two entries, a third 30-foot wide right-in/right out drive has been added to provide entry to serve Parcels 1 and 2 directly and thereby relieving excessive traffic exiting and entering for the main shopping center. An emergency exit only drive has been added to accommodate the concerns of the Fire Department by creating an exit-only drive and also providing sufficient turning radii for oversized fire vehicles. • The eastern driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 440 feet west of the center line of the Jefferson Street intersection, will allow for full movement of both left and right turns onto Avenue 50 thereby providing users access to points east of the Project. Shared left-turn and right-turn markings are specifically outlined in Chapter 3 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and such movements are generally allowed at many corner gas stations throughout Southern California. • The westerly driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 745 feet west of the center line of the Jefferson Street intersection, will be restricted to right turns only. 557 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 19 • Jefferson Street - One 30-foot wide right-in/right-out drive centered approximately410 350 feet north of the centerline of Avenue 50, and one 4035-foot wide right-in/right-out drive, which also allows a left turn into the Project site centered approximately620 640 feet north of the centerline of Avenue 50, or as approved by the City Engineer.. • Entry street to the residential subdivision, north of commercial center - one 30-foot wide left-right-in/left-right-out drive centered approximately 230 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street. 2.7.4.3 Access Drive Aisles The main traffic drive aisle leading into the shopping center from Avenue 50 will provide an access way of 146 feet. The second drive aisle from Avenue 50 has been designed to provide an access way that is approximately 50 feet in length. Because Section 9.150.080 of the Zoning Code, requires a length of 90 feet, this is obtained by adding and additional right turn lane or referred to as a deceleration lane which will be provided. The third drive aisle will further relieve traffic flowing in and out of the shopping center. A deceleration lane will also be provided to adequately mitigate any ill effects of the shorter access way lengths. The easterly drive aisle from Avenue 50 has been designed to provide a 120-foot throated curb along the east and west side. A dedicated 90-foot deceleration lane is provided along the incoming approach east of this drive. 2.7.4.4 Improvement Appurtenances Improvements shall include all appurtenances such as traffic signs, channelization markings and devices and street name signs. 1.1.1.1 Off-Site Traffic Circulation Plan (See accompanying exhibit) 2.7.5 On-Site Traffic Circulation Plan (See accompanying exhibit) 1.1.1.2 Construction/Financing of Improvements Depending on the timing of development of this Specific Plan area and the status of the off-site improvements at that time, the developer may be required to construct the improvements, to reimburse the City or others for the cost of the improvements, to secure the cost of the improvements for the construction by others at a later date, or a combination of these methods. Site access is provided by to two Primary driveways, one each off Jefferson and Ave 50. The Primary driveway on Avenue 50 offers full turning movements and aligns with the main north/south traffic lane along the front of the Pavilions that distributes traffic to the drive isles within the main field of parking. The secondary driveway on Avenue 50 is right turn in, right turn out only, and provides secondary ingress and egress. 558 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 20 The Primary driveway from Jefferson restricts left turn exits, and allows right turns in and right turns out, along with left turns into the site. This Primary driveway intersects the two main north/south internal traffic lanes that distributes traffic to the drive isles within the main field of parking along with the out-parcel parking areas. The secondary driveway on Jefferson is right turn in and right turn out only and provides for secondary ingress and egress. Figure 1 also identifies the on-site truck circulation. 2.7.6 Construction/Financing of Improvements 
 If the developer is required to construct improvements for which this document only obligates a share of the cost, the developer may seek reimbursement of the remaining cost from the City or from adjacent developments, as appropriate, under the City's reimbursement policy. 2.8 Signage A required sign program, as required per Resolution No. 99-63, was will be submitted and approved by the Planning Commission. Community Development in April of 2001. 2.8.1 2.8.1 Signage Locations (See accompanying exhibit) 1.1.1.3 2.8.2.1 Building Sign Locations (See accompanying exhibit) 2.8.2 Major Tenant Sign Details (See accompanying exhibit) 2.8.3 Shop Sign Details • Purpose: To identify tenant • Quantity: One per lease area frontage • Size: One (1) square foot per lineal foot lease frontage to a maximum of 50 square feet, with the size proportional to the facade of the building on which it is mounted. • Design: Letter style and color to be determined by tenant, and approved by the City of La Quinta. • Ancillary signs: Maximum of three (3) information signs on the Albertsons building without further approval for additional signs. As per Specific Plan Condition No. 5 of the Final Conditions of Approval approved as per Council Resolution No. 99-63 "Ancillary signs shall be defined as those identifying products not typical of a food store, such as a bank or one-hour photo." 2.8.4 Monument Sign (See accompanying exhibit) 559 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 21 2.8.5 Store Identity Sign (See accompanying exhibit) 2.9 Landscape Concept The Fairway Plaza Shopping Center will be landscaped following an agrarian theme which will emphasize the use of both palm trees and citrus in groupings. This project lies within a predominately agricultural area which consisted mainly of citrus groves and date orchards in the past. The goal of this design theme is to blend with the surrounding plant palette. Plant material selection will be based on this theme, as well as appearance, low maintenance requirements, climatic suitability and tolerance to local conditions. Palm trees will be used for accenting project features limited to node areas of main entries and street intersections, and canopy trees will be used in parking areas to provide shade. As per Condition No. 37 of the original Conditions of Approval approved for this Specific Plan, upon submission of the first site development permit or conditional use permit, whichever comes first, a preliminary landscape plan will be submitted for City Planning Commission review and approval. The plans include the entire perimeter of the center, retention basin, parking lot area, and the area immediately around the buildings proposed under the permit. The sizes of the proposed trees are included within the plans approved by the City Planning Department, by caliper sizes per accepted industry standards. The plans include the location of permanent cart return corrals proposed for use. Landscaping for the project includes desert tolerant, water efficient plants. The plans include landscape berms within the landscape setbacks along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 to improve views into drive-through facilities and parking areas. Additional landscape treatment is proposed along the project’s western wall behind the Pavilions building to plant intermittent palm trees along the western wall behind Pavilions to break up the building mass from residential views to the west. The applicant has revised the plant palette to include different shade trees including African Sumac and Tipuana Tipu trees in the parking area along with several palm varieties to enhance the architectural statement of the shopping center. In response to concerns regarding shading, the applicant revised the landscape plan to add more shade trees in addition to the palms to provide more shade. The shading plan shows 70% shading of the parking lot which exceeds the minimum 50% required by the Code. Additionally, groupings of pindo palms are placed at the four entrances to create a sense of arrival. Landscaping around the corner plaza area consists of Washingtonia Hybrid palm trees within the plaza for shade and various shrubs including bougainvillea, barrel cactus, cassia and Mexican bird of paradise. A patio area has been included between Buildings 5 and 6. A preliminary landscape plan is submitted as part of this Amendment which is attached (see Attachment 2). 560 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 22 2.9.1 Development Standards Landscaping for the Fairway PlazaPavilion Palms Shopping Center shall comply with the zoning code requirements and the "General Landscaping Guidelines and Irrigation System Design Criteria" by the Coachella Valley Water District. As per original Condition of Approval No. 35 of this Specific Plan, the landscape plans as developed for the shopping center, were reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department in April of 2001.a landscape plan is provided as part of this amendment. As per Condition No. 21 of the original Conditions of Approval for this Specific Plan, efforts will be employed to minimize differences in elevations at abutting properties and between separate lots within the shopping center. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within a tract or parcel map, but not sharing common street frontage where the differential will not exceed five feet. Alternatively, if compliance with this requirement is not feasible, the City of La Quinta will consider and may approve viable options intended to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties, and neighboring-owner dissatisfaction with the grade differentials. 2.9.1.1 Landscape Shading Requirements for Parking Lots The shade trees in the parking areas will be a variety that will provide shade coverage over 50 70 percent of the parking area within 15 to 20 years from installation. 2.9.1.2 Landscape Maintenance Responsibility for the maintenance of the common landscape areas within the development shall be stipulated in the conditions, covenants, and restrictions ("CC&R's") developed for the shopping center, or other enforceable mechanism satisfactory to the City of La Quinta. Landscape materials shall be maintained as planted in perpetuity. Any dead or missing trees shall be replaced within 30 days. 2.9.1.3 Landscape Development Standards Landscaping shall be provided within the landscape setback and retention basins along Jefferson Street and the setback area along Avenue 50. The following standards shall be utilized within the landscaped areas of the Project site: • Slopes: Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights-of-way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right-of-way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. • Finger Islands: A minimum of six feet wide • Tree Size: All 24-inch box trees shall be a minimum orof 4-inch in diameter as measured 12-inch from grade. All 24-inch box trees shall be a minimum of 2-12 to 3-inch in diameter as measured 6-inch from grade. Approved landscape plans will include caliper sizes per accepted industry standards.
 561 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 23 • Irrigation: Landscape areas shall have a permanent irrigation system meeting the requirements of the City Engineer, with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. • Lawn Areas: Use of lawn areas will be minimized.
 • Coordination: The developer shall ensure that landscaping plans and utility plans are coordinated to provide visual screening of aboveground utility structures. • Line of Sight: Plant materials within the clear sight triangle of each entrance shall not exceed 30-inches in height.
 • Landscape Maintenance: if the Project is phased, undeveloped pads shall be turfed or landscaped and irrigated with a groundcover as approved by the City of La Quinta for dust control purposes, and to enhance the appearance of the Project. Additionally, maintenance obligations would be recorded in CC&Rs to which the City would be third party beneficiary. • As per Condition No. 40 of the original Conditions of Approval for this Specific Plan, landscaping will be provided in the area in front of the Albertsons/Savon building, as approved in the applicable Site Development Permit application. • The final landscape plan for the project shall include plans for fencing, landscaping and irrigation for vacant pads. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 2.9.1.4 Landscape Screening The drive-thru restaurants shall provide screening of the cars using the drive-thru facilities by a combination of walls and/or landscaping. Screening of the parking lot surface from the adjacent streets shall be provided through berming, landscaping and/or short decorative walls. 1.1.1.4 Preliminary Landscape Plan (see accompanying exhibit) 1.1.1.5 Proposed Plant Palette (Table 1) 2.10 Maintenance of the Shopping Center As per Condition No. 45 of the original Conditions of Approval approved for this Specific Plan, Tthe applicant will make provisions for the continuous, perpetual maintenance of all required improvements unless and until expressly released from said responsibility by the City of La Quinta. This will include formation of an association or other arrangement acceptable to the City for the maintenance of the retention basins, common areas, and perimeter walls and landscaping. The retention basins are no longer part of this Specific Plan, as stormwater will be directed to underground stormwater system. Therefore, the applicant will make provisions for the continuous, perpetual maintenance of the underground stormwater system. Applicant shall record Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) on the Property. The CC&Rs shall (1) require minimum covenants for satisfactory, perpetual maintenance obligations on the Property; (2) name the City of La Quinta as an express third party beneficiary; (3) be 562 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 24 reviewed and approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to redecoration; and (4) state that the CC&Rs cannot be amended without prior written consent of the City. 563 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 25 3 SPECIFIC PLAN 3.1 Land Use The project site and surrounding properties are currently vacant land. To the north a golf course and residential tract are planned. Across Avenue 50, to the south is a new residential development Tract 29858 and across Jefferson Street to the east and southeast, the land is mostly vacant with a few scattered residences. The adjoining properties have been studied in conjunction with projected development and have not called attention to any adverse or extraordinary circumstances surrounding the area. This project will be developed in accordance with ordinances and/or circumstances stipulated by the City of La Quinta. The Project site is currently vacant land. To the north and west exists the residential subdivision, Renaissance. An approximate 3-acre stormwater retention basin and a Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) well site buffers most of the subdivision from the Project site. Across Avenue 50, to the south, is the Palmilla residential neighborhood. Across Jefferson Street to the east is an existing Ralphs shopping center. To the southeast across Jefferson Street are additional residential subdivisions. This Project will be developed in accordance with ordinances and/or circumstances stipulated by the City of La Quinta. 3.2 Cultural/Archaeology A cultural resources survey was undertaken by CRM TECH to identify and assess cultural resources on the subject site. For complete study see Cultural Resources Report dated December 14, 1998. CRM Tech prepared two studies for the Project site. The first consisted of Phase I and Phase II cultural assessments conducted in 1998 and 1995 for approximate 50 acres of undeveloped land as part of Tentative Parcel Map No. 29052 and Tentative Tract Map No. 29053, which included a residential development and the current commercial Project site. The study was part of the environmental impact review process for the proposed subdivision and development of the property, as required by the City of La Quinta, Lead Agency for the Project, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC §21000, et seq.). The second study was conducted in June 2017 and consisted of a historical/archaeological resources records search, historical background review, and an archaeological field inspection of the approximately 12-acre Project site (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, or ground disturbance, mitigation measures as recommended by the archaeological assessment for the site shall be completed at the developer's expense. 564 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 26 3.2.1 Tribal Consultation, SB18 and AB52 California Senate Bill 18 requires a 90-day consultation period between a lead agency and California Native American Tribes when an application for a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, or Specific Plan Amendment is submitted. The City of La Quinta initiated the SB18 consultation process on January 10, 2018 and the process ended April 10, 2018. The outcome of consultation is anticipated to result in Native American Monitoring during ground-disturbing activities. California Assembly Bill 52 (AB52) went into effect on July 1, 2015, which established and requires a consultation process with all recognized California Native American Tribes to consider any tribal or cultural values when determining a specific Project impact/mitigation. The City of La Quinta initiated AB52 process began October 3, 2017. Letters were sent to tribes on the list received from the Native American Heritage Commission. Responses were received from Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (Cabazon), Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) and Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians (Twenty-Nine Palms). The Cultural Study from CRM Tech was sent to ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms as requested. Both ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms asked for approved Native American Monitors from the ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms to be present during ground disturbing activities of the Project construction. Mitigation measures have been implemented into the environmental study to have a Native American Monitor present from either tribe. 3.3 Paleontology A paleontologic assessment of the Project site was conducted by the Paleontologic Resource Assessment Program of the Section of Paleontology, San Bernardino County Museum in November, 1998. It was and on May 2, 2017. Both studies concluded in the report that sediments found at the site have the potential to contain significant nonrenewable paleontologic resources which may be negatively impacted by any grading or excavation. A review of relevant paleontologic literature indicates that significant fossil remains have been recovered from properties in the same vicinity as the Project site, thus contributing to the interpretation of high paleontologic sensitivity. Due to the above considerations, a program to mitigate the impact on nonrenewable resources is recommended. This program should include, but not be limited to, the monitoring of any excavation of the site, preparation of the recovered specimens, identification and curation of specimens and the preparation of a final report, and inventory, of the findings. The mitigation program will be complete when the final report is submitted to the lead agency, the City of La Quinta. 565 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 27 3.4 Environmental 3.4.1 Air Quality The potential of1998 air quality report prepared for the original Specific Plan identified that the Project construction and subsequent operations of the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center toProject would result in air quality emissions that would exceed the daily criteria, as recommended by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, willbut would be mitigated to the extent that they are reasonably feasible by measures as recommended by Synectecology in their air quality report of November 5, 1998. Mitigation measures recommended include, but are not limited to, maintaining all construction equipment in good condition so as to reduce operational emissions, the use of low emission construction equipment whenever feasible and the use of low VOC paints, primers and coatings. In addition, long term mitigation will be aided by the availability of public transportation facilities along with direct vehicular and pedestrian access points to the adjacent residential subdivision, and the provision of bicycle facilities within the development. Although residual emissions would be expected to remain in excess of recommended threshold values for CO, NOx, ROG and the impact iswas expected to remain significant, Synectecology found this Project to be consistent with the policies and goals of the Air Quality Management Plan and that it will result in less intensive commercial development at the site than that allowed under the existing General Plan, thereby reducing potential emissions. In 2013, the City of La Quinta adopted its General Plan, which assessed the environmental impacts of current and future projects based on the zoning designations or approved specific plans. The Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, which included 100,460 square feet of retail space with accommodating parking and landscape area, had been approved prior to the assessment of environmental impacts of the City’s General Plan. On February 19, 2013, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR. In May 2018, Amendment 2 to the Fairway Plan Specific Plan was proposed, to add a net increase of 25,340 square-feet of new uses not previously reviewed or approved in the 1999 Specific Plan and subsequent 2012 Updated General Plan. As such, in 2018, a revised air quality assessment was prepared to address the additional 25,340 square feet not previously analyzed. The study found that the net increase would not exceed thresholds of significance for air quality impacts. Further, that the additional uses would not cumulatively generate a considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant nor violate any air quality standard during construction and operation of the proposed Project. In November 2020, the Specific Plan was refined to reflect the direction of City staff after multiple meetings with the community, the planning commission and the City Council. Ultimately, the Specific Plan adds 24,530, which is less than the 25,340 assessed in the 2018 Initial Study. Therefore, no further air quality impacts are anticipated from the November 2020 Specific Plan refinement. 566 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 28 The site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The proposed Project represents approximately 0.232 FAR. Therefore, the Project proposes less intensity than allowed under the zoning. 3.4.2 Greenhouse Gas The City of La Quinta adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (Plan) on February 13, 2013. The Plan provides reduction strategies and reduction measures that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions at their source and at the end use by improving operating efficiency, increasing reliance on renewable source for energy production, developing new technologies, and through conservation. These reduction measures are listed in Table 28 of the Plan and can be implemented as needed during the design phase. The Project will comply with the strategies of the City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. 3.4.3 Noise A noise study, dated November 5, 1998, was provided by Synectecology for this Project. Recommendations made to ensure that any construction noise impacts will be reduced to less than significant levels include the following: all construction will be performed between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M., Monday through Saturday; all internal combustion equipment will be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers; and, all pieces of stationary equipment will be located as far as practical from adjacent residences. Operational noise will be reduced by limiting on-site deliveries to the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. and erecting a wall by an existing soundwall that varies in height from six (6) feet to eight (8) feet in height behind the north and west commercial center. This measure will reduce any potentially significant impacts to a level that is less than significant and no further mitigation will be warranted parcel perimeter. Noise studies for the Project were prepared in 2002 as part of the Specific Plan Amendment approval and in 2017 and in 2018 to serve as an update. A 2002 study identified that both Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue were impacted, and exceed 60 dBA CNEL. The study identified that all new development is required to mitigate to the City's standards for noise, as required in the General Plan (Table EH-1, Warner Engineering, February 19, 2002). The 2017 noise study also concluded that areas along Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue were impacted and exceeded the 60dBA criteria. Ambient noise measured along various locations along the north and west perimeter of the site, nearest to the residences, measured between 53.9 and 60 dBA. The study determined that the main sources of noise across the site are noise from road traffic on 50th Avenue and Jefferson street, other noise sources included HVAC systems serving the houses to the north, west and south of the site and from HVAC serving the commercial buildings to the east, across Jefferson Street. There was also minor noise from distant aircraft and birdsong. 567 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 29 Noise is also anticipated from the speakers of the drive-through eating establishments, as well as vehicle doors closing in the parking lot. The Project is proposed approximately 150 feet between the closest development building and the residences to the south. The residences to the south already have a concrete masonry boundary wall. 3.4.4 Trash Recycling Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, a plan for adequate trash recycling provisions shall be approved by the CommunityDesign and Development Department. The plan is to be reviewed for acceptability by applicable trash company prior to City review. 3.5 Zoning The subject property has a CC ("Community Commercial") designation in place and is identified within the General Plan use designation as CommunityGeneral Commercial. The specific uses and requirements of the CC zone relevant to this Project are outlined in Section 3.5.3 of this Specific Plan. 3.5.1 Zoning Standards The Fairway PlazaPavilion Palms Shopping Center will be developed following the framework of the general zoning requirements of the CC zone of the City of La Quinta. 3.5.2 Deviations from Zoning Code The following development standards are proposed as deviations from the City of La Quinta Zoning Code. A brief justification for each request is included. and identifies if previous deviations are still applicable. 3.5.2.1 Number of Parking Stalls Provided The required parking for the shopping center is 474 stalls and has been provided in the design. The percentage of landscaping proposed, both in the parking areas and near the buildings exceeds the required percentage by 30 percent. The parking stall deviation requested in the previously-approved Specific Plan no longer applies. The site has been redesigned to accommodate the required parking for the shopping center per the La Quinta Zoning Code. The site provides of 532 stalls, and the applicant shall install a minimum of 12 electric charging facilities in the anchor tenant’s parking lot. 3.5.2.2 Reduction in Landscape Setback Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 are considered arterial roadways in the City’s General Plan. The municipal code requires a 20-ft. landscape setback along arterial roadways. The Specific Plan will change the standard for the site to 18 ft., which is a 10 percent reduction to the setback. 568 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 30 3.5.2.3 Retail Store over 50,000 Square Feet of Floor Area The AlbertsonsPavilions grocery store will have approximately 57,56063,000 square feet of floor area which exceeds the permitted retail store size of 50,000 square feet maximum. This retail store, however, will actually combine several allowed uses under one roof. Included within the grocery store will be a full service pharmacy with a drive-thru window, as well as a liquor department which will sell beer, wine and hard liquor. 1.1.1.6 Automobile Service Station 3.5.2.4 Fuel Center/Convenience Store The site has been designed to accommodate the option of an automobile service station that would be on the building pad located at the southeast corner of the site. In the event that the developer wishes to develop it for this purpose, the service station use will need to be approved by the Planning Commission under a Conditional Use Permit. The site has been designed to accommodate a fuel center with a convenience store that would be located on the building pad located along the Jefferson Street frontage. This fuel center/ convenience store is an adjunct to the grocery store/pharmacy anchor tenant. The proposed operation will consist of one 825-square-foot convenience market, a 100-foot by 50- foot fueling canopy over three sets of double fuel islands with 12 fueling stations and a monument sign for required pricing and identification. The specific location and design of the monument sign will be part of the overall sign program for the Specific Plan that will be submitted at a future date. The fuel center operation will include dispensing of motor vehicle fuel, an automobile-related air/water unit, and a 825 square-foot convenience market that will offer the sale of convenience dry goods and general merchandise, lottery tickets, refrigerated dairy/deli products and prepared food and drinks. The hours of operation of the convenience store/fuel center will be 7:00 AM to 10 PM, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission or the Director/Manager of the Design and Development Department. The convenience store/fuel center will be staffed by 6 employees. The anchor tenant Pavilions is responsible for obtaining and maintaining all State, federal and local permits associated with the fuel operations and convenience store. Primary fuel center equipment will include air and water dispensers, two-10,000 gallon and one 20,000-gallon underground tanks along with necessary underground compressors and pumping components. Primary equipment for the convenience store will include refrigerated cases for display and storage of dairy/deli and beverage products, together with related compressors and refrigeration systems. The convenience store will include one restroom and a manager’s office. 569 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 31 During the operation, typical material such as solvents, paints, lubricants, metals, industrial-grade cleaners, refrigerants, petroleum products and other automotive-related hazardous materials will be utilized. These materials will be handled in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations with respect to hazardous materials. Parking lot lighting, access and customer and truck circulation will be integrated as part of the Specific Plan. Final exterior building design will be subject to future Planning Commission approval, but will follow the Contemporary architecture theme as established with Specific Plan. The fuel center and convenience store are currently planned to be associated with the supermarket tenant. The anchor supermarket tenant and fuel center (with or without a convenience store) are permitted uses as long as both uses are developed in tandem and both uses continue to operate. However, if one use continues and the other is discontinued, approval of a Conditional Use Permit will be required. 3.5.2.5 Depth of Entry Access Ways The lengths of three of the access ways into the commercial development are less than the 90 feet required by the Zoning Code, Section 9.150.080. Due to the fact that this shopping center and parking lot are located diagonally to the adjacent streets, entryways of shorter lengths will allow for greater efficiency in traffic flow in to and through the parking areas. A deceleration lane will also be provided at each of the shorter entries intended to mitigate any traffic flow problems off of the adjacent public streets. The length of the east side of the easterly most Avenue 50 drive into the commercial development is less than the 90 feet as required by the Zoning Code, Section 9.150.080. As a mitigating measure, a dedicated 90-foot deceleration lane has been provided along its easterly approach. 3.5.2.6 Retention Basin An extensive drainage study was performed to address the retention on the project. Even though the Zoning Code, Section 9.60.240 states that no retention of storm waters is allowed within the setback area other than incidental storm water that falls on the setback, certain areas used for the above ground retention fall into the setback area in several sections of the landscape area due to the meandering of the designated landscape area. Areas will be used with catch basins and drywalls, or combinations thereof, to collect water that eventually flow into the proposed above ground retention areas utilizing the landscape area for capacity. A determination has been made that the proposed retention basin and drainage system will meet or exceed the criteria of the Riverside County Flood Control, Water Conservation District, and the City of La Quinta standards.\ A retention basin was approved for stormwater retention in the previous Specific Plan. This Amendment removes the basin and replaces it with an underground stormwater system. This is consistent with City codes, and no deviation is necessary. 570 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 32 3.5.2.7 Building Height The building design in the Specific Plan include various slanted roof lines and varying building heights along the frontages and corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street, which is identified in the City’s Circulation Element as Image Corridors. The rooflines contain an architectural slanted features that vary in height between approximately 1 and 13 feet above the City standard of a 22- foot building height for construction with an Image Corridor (per Code Section 9.90.040 Table of Development Standards, footnote 6). The irregular roofline features are designed to blend with the elevational irregularity of the natural viewshed and to enhance the view of the built environment as a gateway treatment within the Image Corridor. The General Plan encourages a gateway treatment that contributes to varying streetscapes in a City Image Corridor. Building elevation renderings are provided in Attachment 4. To accommodate variation in building design, the maximum building height shall be 40 feet, per the underlying CC zone, including within the first 150 feet of the Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street rights-of-way. 3.5.3 Permitted Uses Community Commercial: • Retail stores under 10,000 square feet floor area per business • Retail stores under 10,000 to 50,000 square feet floor area • Retail stores under 50,000 to 75,000 square feet floor area · • Food, liquor and convenience stores under 10,000 square feet floor area, open less than 18 hours/day • Automobile service stations, with or without minimart, with anchor tenant. (For this development, the fuel center and convenience store are planned to be associated with the supermarket tenant. The anchor supermarket tenant and fuel center [with or without a convenience store] are permitted uses so long as both uses are developed in tandem and both uses continue to operate. However, if one use continues and the other one is discontinued, approval of a Conditional Use Permit will be required. • Showroom/catalog stores, without substantial onsite inventory • Barber shops, beauty, nail and tanning salons and similar uses • Miscellaneous services such as travel services, photo developing, videotape rentals, shoe repair, appliance repair, and similar uses • Laundromats and dry cleaners except central cleaning plants 
 • Printing, blueprinting and copy services 
 • Pet grooming without overnight boarding 
 • Banks 
 • General and professional offices • Medical offices - physicians, dentists, optometrists, chiropractors, and similar practitioners • Medical centers - four or more offices in one building 
 571 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 33 • Surgical and medical clinics • Restaurants, other than drive-thru • Restaurants, drive-thru 
 • Restaurants, counter take-out with ancillary seating, such as yogurt, ice cream, pastry shops and similar • Commercial recreational 
 • Museum or gallery displaying sculpture, artwork or crafts, including schools for the above
 • Parks, unlighted playfields, and open space 
 • Bicycle, equestrian and hiking trails 
 • Fire stations 
 • Government offices and police stations 
 • Public flood control facilities and devices 
 • Emergency shelters 
 • Auto parts stores, with no repair or parts installation on the premises 
 * Notes: 1. Other than convenience stores. Items sold may include clothing, groceries, meat, drugs, jewelry, sundries, office supplies, pets, furniture, appliances, hardware, building materials (except lumber yards), and similar retail items. 2. With no consumption of alcohol on the premises. 3.5.4 3.5.4 Permitted Uses with a Conditional Use Permit Automobile service stations are permitted use within the Community Commercial zoning designation upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 3.6 Specific Design Features 3.6.1 Screen Wall In order to mitigate noise and light generated from the shopping center, a solid eight-foot high masonry screen wall that varies in height from 6 feet to 8 feet has been constructed to the City of La Quinta standards between thise commercial Project site and the plannedexisting residential development to the north and west will be constructed to City of La Quinta standards. 3.6.2 Screening of Rooftop Equipment Consistent with the Zoning Code, the design of the buildings will architecturally integrate or screen from view the location of all rooftop and wall mounted mechanical equipment by means of a parapet wall. 572 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 34 3.6.3 Utility Enclosures Unless located underground, any utility enclosures including pallet enclosures, propane/generator enclosures shall consist of masonry materials sufficient in height to screen all storage with solid painted gates provided, with the design, colors, and materials architecturally integrated with that of the shopping center subject to approval of the CommunityDesign and Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3.6.4 Cart Storage Cart storage areas will be provided as required by the City of La Quinta with the design and location subject to approval by the Design and Development DepartmentCommunity Development Director, prior to issuance of a building permit. 3.6.5 Exterior Lighting Exterior lighting for the Project will be designed to comply with the City's "Dark Sky"outdoor lighting ordinance, (Section 9.100.150 of the Municipal Code) and shall be subject to approval by the CommunityDesign and Development Department prior to issuance of building permits. All exterior lighting will incorporate directional lenses and/or will architecturally incorporate shield lighting elements intended to minimize ambient light from illuminating adjacent streets and residential properties to the satisfaction of the CommunityDesign and Development Department. Parking lot light standards shall be a maximum 25 20 feet in height with light elements that will similarly be shielded, and shall provide a uniform minimum average of one (1) candle foot illumination within the parking lot areas. 3.7 Property Rights Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or approval of a final map, the property owner will acquire or confer easements and other property rights required by this Specific Plan or any tentative maps or site development permits necessary in the development of the Specific Plan area. The property owner will also dedicate or grant public and private street right-of- ways and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. Right-of-way dedications required of this development will include the following: • Jefferson Street: 60-foot half of a 120-foot right-of-way. In addition, the owner shall make an irrevocable offer to grant an additional 17 feet of right-of-way, (not to exceed 250 feet in length), for future southbound turn lanes at the Avenue 50 intersection. • Avenue 50: 50-foot half of a 100-foot right-of-way Dedications will also include additional widths, as necessary for corner cutbacks, bus turnouts and other features contained in the approved construction plans and as per the representations made within this Specific Plan. 573 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 35 If the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 rights-of-way are necessary prior to development of the commercial area or approval of the final map for the residential subdivision, the developer shall grant easements or permanent right-of-way over those areas within 60 days of written request by the City. The property owner shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights-of-way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): • Jefferson Street - 20: 18 feet (34 feet in areas where deceleration lanes are provided and 37 feet in the area of the future turn lane widening)minimum • Avenue 50 - 20: 18 feet minimum The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately owned setbacks, the property owner shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. The property owner will vacate abutter's rights of access to Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 from all frontage along streets except access points conforming to the General Plan and approved by the City Engineer. The developer will furnish to the City of La Quinta proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate as obtained from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes or other encroachments are to occur. 3.8 Administration In accordance with General Plan Programs LU 2.2b and 2.2c, if the need for any changes to the Specific Plan arise, the Design and Development Director will have the authority to waive the need for a Specific Plan amendment under the following circumstances: • When changes to the land use allocation are less than 5%; • When the off‐site circulation pattern and turning movements will not be altered by the proposed change; • When the change is considered minor in nature and does not conflict with the purpose and intent of the Specific Plan; • When no new land use is proposed. Additionally, the Design and Development Director will determine substantial conformance in approved Specific Plans. 574 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 36 Attachment 1 Lighting Plan 575 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 37 Attachment 2 Preliminary Landscape Plans 576 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 38 Attachment 3 Preliminary Grading Plans 577 City of La Quinta SDP 2017-0009 Fairway Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (supersedes Amendment 1) Specific Plan Comparison between Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Page 39 Attachment 4 Conditions of Approval Fairway Shopping Center Specific Plan Resolution 99-63 Conditions of Approval – Final Specific Plan 98-034 Lundin Development May 18, 1999 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 15, 2020 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-0006 (SDP 2013-924, AMENDMENT 1) TO AMEND SIGNATURE AT PGA WEST SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANS; CEQA: PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT COMPLETED FOR EDEN ROCK AT PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATION: WITHIN THE PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN AREA RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to approve Site Development Permit 2020-0006 (SDP 2013- 924, Amendment 1) approving a new architectural single family residential plan set for Signature at PGA West within the Eden Rock at PGA West Specific Plan Area; and find the project consistent with previously certified Subsequent Environmental Impact Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Site Development Permit 2013-924 (SDP 2013-924) was approved on December 3, 2013, which included approval of 130 single family residential detached and 100 condominium units within the central area of PGA West. •A total of 24 single family units have been constructed and the project has not been recently active. •The applicant has proposed an amendment to SDP 2013-924, for eight (8) new plan types for the remaining single family units (Attachment 1). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 2008, the Eden Rock at PGA West development was approved for a 264-unit residential development within a ~42-acre project site within PGA West (Attachment 2). This project allowed a mix of single family attached and detached units and condominium units. After a change in market conditions, the project was revised and changed to the Signature at PGA West project, which was approved in December 2013, for a 130 single family detached and PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 623 100 condominium unit residential development. The approval included SDP 2013-924, which approved the overall site, architectural, and landscaping design of the single family detached units for the project, including eight (8) plan types split between the “Haciendas” and “Estates” plans (Attachment 3). SDP 2013-924 plans included: -Haciendas: •Four (4) Hacienda plans from 1,941-2,429 square feet (sf) •Two 1-story plans and two 2-story plans •Tuscan, Andalusian, and Spanish Colonial styles. -Estates: •Four (4) plans ranging from 2,528-3,446 sf •Two 1-story plans and two 2-story plans •Tuscan, Andalusian, and Spanish Colonial styles. A total of 11 Estate plans and 13 Hacienda plans have been constructed, leaving 106 single family lots remaining to be built. The applicant proposes a change to these plan types for the remaining lots, changing all eight (8) plans (Attachment 4), which include the following: - Haciendas: •Four plans ranging from 1,773-2,009 sf, each with three (3) different elevations •Four 1-story plans •Spanish Colonial, Tuscan, and Santa Barbara styles - Estates: •Four plans ranging from 2,131-2,530 sf, each with three (3) different elevations •Three 1-story plans and one 2-story plan •Spanish Colonial, Tuscan, and Santa Barbara The applicant is proposing the changes due to market changes. According to the applicant, the change to mostly 1-story plans is due to preferences for single level homes within the Coachella Valley and within PGA west. The applicant has stated that the large predominately 2-story homes on smaller lots within the community has impacted buyer interest of future homes and has stalled construction of the remaining current approved plan types. Staff reviewed the proposal against Section 9.200.090 of the Municipal Code and determined that it exceeds the scope of a staff level modification by applicant, in part due to changes in square footage beyond 10%. The main changes between the originally approved SDP and amendment include: -Reduction in square footage for the plan types, due to removal of 2- story floor plans •Haciendas—ranging from 9% change for the smallest unit to 17% for the largest unit 624 •Estates—ranging from 16% change for the smallest units to 27% for the largest unit - Removal of Andalusian style and introduction of Santa Barbara style -Removal of many of the original second story architectural elements, including balconies, massing changes, and tower elements. Site design, landscaping, materials, and lot numbers all remain the same from the original approval. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Planning Commission The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting on November 24, 2020, recommended approval of the project. Public Agency Review This request was sent to all applicable City departments and all applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Notice The public hearing notice was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 4, 2020 and was sent to property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received as of this date. The PGA West Fairways Association Board of Directors has reviewed and approved of the proposed changes to the plan types. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department has determined that the proposed project is within and consistent with the Eden Rock at PGA West Specific Plan Subsequent Environmental Impact Report EA 2006-562 (SCH #2007061056) certified by the La Quinta City Council on April 15, 2008. Prepared by: Carlos Flores, Senior Planner Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1.Project Information 2.Vicinity Map 3.SDP 2013-924 Plan Set 4. SDP 2020-0006 Plan Set 625 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL PLANS FOR SIGNATURE AT PGA WEST AND FINDING THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CERTIFIED FOR EDEN ROCK AT PGA WEST CASE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-0006 (SDP 2013-924, AMENDMENT 1) APPLICANT: WOODBRIDGE PACIFIC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 15th day of December, 2020, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Woodbridge Pacific for approval of amendments to the approved single family residential architectural plans for Signature at PGA West development, generally located, within the PGA West Specific Plan, Planning Area III, more particularly described as: Tract 36537 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 4, 2020 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 24th day of November, 2020, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and recommended approval of this project; and Site Development Permit 2020-0006 (SDP 2013-924, Amd 1) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1.Consistency with General Plan 626 The proposed development is consistent with the Tourist Commercial General Plan land use designation. The City’s General Plan policies relating to Tourist Commercial permits residential development that include single family residential. Under Amendment 6 to the PGA West Specific Plan, this residential community is integrated into the existing Tourist Commercial land use as set forth in the Specific Plan. 2.Consistency with Zoning Code and PGA West Specific Plan (SP 83- 002) The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City’s Zoning Code and the PGA West Specific Plan, as amended in terms of project location, architectural style, and standards. 3.Compliance with CEQA The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is within the Eden Rock at PGA West Specific Plan, which had a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report EA 2006-562 (SCH #2007061056) certified by the La Quinta City Council on April 15, 2008. 4.Architectural Design The architecture and layout of the project is compatible with, and not detrimental to, the existing surrounding residential land uses, and is consistent with the development standards in the Municipal Code. The units are concluded to be appropriate for the proposed locations, and supplemental design elements appropriately enhance the architecture of the buildings. The architecture and layout of the project is compatible with the subject specific plan. The architecture is compatible with the existing units within the development, including the entire PGA West development, incorporating similar architectural styles, materials, and features. 5.Site Design The site design of the project is compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. No site design is proposed to be changed as part of this amendment. 627 6.Landscape Design The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The project landscaping is not proposed to be amended as part of this amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; SECTION 2. That the above project be determined by the City Council to be consistent with previously certified Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Eden Rock at PGA West Specific Plan (EA 2006-562); SECTION 3. That it does hereby approve of Site Development Permit 2020- 0006 (SDP 2013-924, Amendment 1) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 15th day of December, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 628 ATTEST: _________________________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________________ WILLIAM IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 629 GENERAL 1.The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2.Site Development Permit 2020-0006 (SDP 2013-924 Amendment 1) shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approval: Site Development Permit 2013-924 Specific Plan 83-002 and all subsequent amendments (PGA West Specific Plan, including Amendment #6: Eden Rock at PGA West) Tract Map 36537 Development Agreement 2006-011 Environmental Assessment 2006-562; Subsequent EIR SCH #2007061056 3.In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 4.Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: •Riverside County Fire Marshal •La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) •Design & Development Department •Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department •Coachella Valley Unified School District •Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) •Imperial Irrigation District (IID) •California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) •State Water Resources Control Board •SunLine Transit Agency •SCAQMD Coachella Valley 630 The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 631 PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-0006 (SDP 2013- 924 AMENDMENT 1) APPLICANT: WOODBRIDGE PACIFIC PROPERTY OWNER: WOODBRIDGE PACIFIC & CALWEST COMMUNITIES REQUESTS: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-0006 (SDP 2013-924, AMENDMENT 1) TO AMEND ORIGINALLY APPROVED SIGNATURE AT PGA WEST SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANS LOCATION: BOUNDED BY PGA BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH AND WEST, PGA STADUM COURSE AND CLUBHOUSE TO THE NORTH AND EAST. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: TOURIST COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATION: TOURIST COMMERCIAL SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/GOLF COURSE; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/GOLF COURSE SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/GOLF COURSE; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/GOLF COURSE EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/GOLF COURSE; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/GOLF COURSE WEST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/GOLF COURSE; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/GOLF COURSE ATTACHMENT 1 632 ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 2633 634 A4.0 I PLAN A4.02 PLAN A4.03 PLAN A4.04 PLAN A4.05 PLAN A4.06 PLAN A4.07 PLAN A4.08 PLAN A4.09 PLAN A4.I0 PLAN A4.I I PLAN A4.12 PLAN A4.13 PLAN A4.14 PLAN POINTE LARSON, LLC SECTION 4: ARCHITECTURAL PLANS -THE ESTATES A/ I XA -FLOOR PLAN A4.15 PLAN 2A/2XA -FLOOR PLAN A -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION A4.I6 PLAN 2A -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION A -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION A4.17 PLAN 2A -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION A-ROOF PLAN A4.18 PLAN 2A -ROOF PLAN XA -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION A4.19 PLAN 2XA -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION XA -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION A4.20 PLAN 2XA -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION XA -ROOF PLAN A4.21 PLAN 2XA -ROOF PLAN B/ I XB -FLOOR PLAN A4.22 PLAN 2B/2XB -FLOOR PLAN B -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION A4.23 PLAN 2B -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION B -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION A4.24 PLAN 2B -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION B -ROOF PLAN A4.25 PLAN 2B -ROOF PLAN XB -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION A4.26 PLAN 2XB -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION XB -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION A4.27 PLAN 2XB -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION XB -ROOF PLAN A4.28 PLAN 2XB -ROOF PLAN THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard 0Me, Su1le 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 filx+1S495530548 W.'f1J,bassen1an!agonicnrn Ccpyrighl2012 BassenianllagolliArchileds 766.12247 ATTACHMENT 3 ATTACHMENT 3635 20'-0" r-=:r-=------------------­� ----------------- 1 I I I r Jl ''rf-11, I11, L Ill t t-.:1I I I I DO [,• C : -�no 0 0 □ GREAT ROOM 2sZ x 1e1. KITCHEN 2s I xii 1 40'-0" 20'-0" 0.0 0 MASTER BEDROOM I II I I 191 X l3Q MASTER BATH 0.0 co5Ro 00 DEN IJQ X 13.i Ju , i 00 I L � .�. =c:::::'.J-'k- B DROOM 2 0 o,e 13� Xl2� 'A 'A GARAGE '� JR. MAST R U r"{ I BEDROO 20± x2oi 13Q x1,a .C! ":' N I CART • : GARAGE� • � I +-101 x 7!" � ..............,_-1---_____ 6:==����..::=-...::=-_===.._=..J __ -+-----"I<---- 18'-3 1/2" 7'-3" ll'-I11/2" 40'-0" FIRST FLOOR 2, 5 5 3 S. F. P L A N I A/ I XA -2, 6 0 4 S.F. c=±::::::i====:j8 SCALE: IW = 1'-0" THE ESTATES POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINT A , CALIFORNIA � 21'-8 1/2" 16'-4 1/2" -; r·.r::. I --' ' JR. MASTER 1s! x1sQ 2'-6' 21 '-8 1/2" SECOND FLOOR 0 P T. 4 0 2 S. F. 2, 9 5 5 S. F. '� 0 CASITA 13Q X ts! ,:'',, ,, ,, � N FIRST FLOOR OPT . A 4.01 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orch>11 Drive, Su!e 100 Newport Bea<:h CA USA 91660 lel.+19495539100 lax•1949553Q5.18 www basseniiliagoni com Copyr9Jl 2011 Bassenlan/1.agoni Arcncects 766.12247 636 0----�--t_-_-_--.B SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC FRONT TUSCAN IW=l'-0" �r mem�se �--------- REAR PLAN IA THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA RAISED PlATE HEIGi-ff AT OUTDOOR LIVING � 1ST FLOOR PLATE HEADER • +I ·' ' N � 0 00 ISTF.F. ANISH GRADE J A 4.02 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Dri�e, Suils 100Newport8eadl, CA USA 92660 lel.•19-l95539100 fax•19-l95530548 wwwbassenianlagonio:im Cop)«jh12012 lla""1•n I Lago-I ArcMeds 766.12247 l�Wt:(l'.IJ•ra,II_JW,IIQ: 637 LEFT RIGHT O::::: =::::2 =:::4:::::===:::8 SCALE: 1/4" = i'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC PLAN ·1·· I II I II I II IA THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA Ill 1111 ·1111·1111 I I □ TOP OF RIDGE RAISED PLATE HEIGHT 1ST Fl.OOlil PLATE HEADER ' ' N � 0 00 ISTFF +I A 4.03 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNiNG • iNTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Sude 100 Nlrl¥J)llf1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 fax.+19495530548 wwwbassenianlagonicom Copvrighl2012 BassenianlLagonlArchltects 766.12247 638 0 l -1 POINTE LARSON, LLC ,-------------------------7 I I I I I l l l I ........_ I I I I I I I I I I l I l I j I I l I I I ,----- I I I I I I I I I I ______________ _J ► --------7 I I I I I I I I ________ J 1 ___ 1 ________ 7 ; I I ; I I ; I _......._ I ;...-.I I I I I I L ___________ , ROOF PLAN PITCH, 3,12 RAKE, 6" EAVE, 18" ROOF MATERIAL; 'S' TILE L_ ____ _ PLAN IA THE ESTATES LA QUINT A . CALIFORNIA 1---------1 ►: I ____ _J IA-TUSCAN A 4.04 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Ord1'ld ll!iYO, Sli1e 100 Ne"110'1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 ru+19495530&16 wwwbasse..-..g:,,ia,m Copyng�2011 ea.senonug00Altlliecls 766.12247 639 0 2 ◄--' SCALE: 114" = 1'·0" POINTE LARSON, LLC FRONT Ill ••• c1 G a REAR Ill ••• t:.-:--�� 1.:, TUSCAN 11◄'=1'.o· TOP OF RIDGE 2ND FLR PlA TE {­ HEADER t ---_ ____;;lNc;;cD f-!.:_ !\-�----'l.:..;.ST=FLR;:.;..,P.l.ATI 1\-�+I HEADER ' PLAN IXA THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 1ST Ff, --�-, ----\ 'FINISH GRADE I A 4.05 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 20310<ilPIDM.9J•100N"'!l<)f11leadl,CAUSA 92660 ,..,1t1!16II� fa,.19495SJ0!48 --.--.w.ba.s5enian�com eq,,,ig/li2012e.,...,.,,IL,go-iA<c1riiea, 766.12247 640 LEFT RIGHT 0t=:t:2 :=t:4 ====>8 SCALE: 1/4" = l'.O" POINTE LARSON, LLC •••• •••• 1111 1111 1111 1111 = == I II I II Ill Ill Ill Ill ±72'-8 1/2" -J.t------------------------------------------- 2ND FLA. PLATE HEADER TOP OF RIDGE N "'+I I %< I� ' N '!! Ill I HfADEA �� a\--- l - l -+----+-----l•i= _1 4---------------------1 ---"IST-'""-F.;;.;..'z�O->le -1 PLAN IXA THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 4.06 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, suae 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 fax+19495530548 wwwbasseniar.Jagonicom Copvri�20128assenianllagoniArchilecls 766.12247 641 ::::0 =:::::2 =::±1 ====:8 SCALE: IW = I '-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC ,-------------------------7 I I I I I I I I I _..... l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,----- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------,--------_J --------7 I I I I I I I I ________ J -'--------7 I I I I I I I I I l .. �.J I I I I L __________ _ � _J ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 6" EAVE: 18" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE I I "<;;,7' I I I I I I I I i_ ___________ _j IXA-TUSCAN PLAN IXA THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 4.07 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni UCHITECTURE • PUNNING • INTERIORS 2031 Ordlard Dri'IE!, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 tel.+19-495539100 fax+194955305i1B www basseriianlagoni oom Copyright2011 Bas.5eniarJl.agoniAlthit8CIS 766.12247 642 20'-0" err =================== OomoP 019�VIN2 0 IT .-r=J□ 0 □I GREATROOM � _.. 2Slx1ei ' 0 □ DD ; �-l : .. ,.: I I KITCHEN 2s! x11 i 40'-0" 20'-0" o_o 0 MASTER it .� I BEDROOM 191 X 13.Q. MASTER BATH .I , , ,1 o�ocod.RD � oo i = L] DEN I 13.Q. x lli II j 0 -�0 � i I I DROOM 2 13� Xl2� !O !5"8_J GARAGE 20.± x20± L J.L ' I I I I I t--CART I GARAGE I 10! >< 1! .,. I I I I ,.., ' I -!- ..o11.--�--1------------b--_-_,_��-========:i:.==.l 18'-3 I /2" 10'-4 1/2" 8'-10" 40'-0" FIRST FLOOR 2, 5 5 3 S. F. PLAN I B / IXB -2,604 S.F. 0c:::i2==:i:::=:::::j8 SCALE: IW = 1'-0" THE ESTATES POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ,.., _, 21 '-8 1/2" 16'-4 1/2" 21'-8 1/2" SECOND FLOOR 0 P T. 3 5 4 S. F. 2, 9 5 8 S. F. � •" �· 11 II II II 0 0 CASITA 13.Q. XIS! FIRST FLOOR OPT. A 4.08 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 On:haro Ome, Suite 100 Ne"po1 Bea<:h, CA USA 92660 lel +1S495539100 fax+1S49S53Q5.18WWW �nlagoni,Cllm �2011Basseniantago,,;Ad,..,, 766.12247 643 FRONT ANDALUSIAN 1/4"•1'-0" .,..=-,, •• ✓,vi -c;--a--..----..---,□ ....-----=----____.c;--='-:"7 REAR PLAN 1B r0 =:i1t=±:=:=Y SCALE: 1/4" • 1'-0" THE ESTATES POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA TOP OF RIDGE l RAISED PlATE HEIGHT AT OUTDOOR LIVING 1ST FLOOR PLATE HEADER�- : ' ' N � 0 co ISTF,F. A 4.09 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 20310teha1dDrive,Su1J! 100Ne�Beadi,CAUSA 92660 ltl.+19495539100 fa,:+1949�0548 ..... -"'"900""' ecw,.�2012 ea...,;anllagoojAodli>!d, 766.12247 f.l;to.,.JMIU•J',.D..,."11� 644 \ ...... :, LEFT RIGHT 0::::=:::::1 =::::::4 ====::8 SCALE: 114" = 1'-0" -::-"' :, p ... •'1 ... ��::"="9 .,. POINTE LARSON, LLC ···=••• i II II II II :.. ( � J � , I � II II II Ill Ill ID Ill .. ? l Ill PLAN 1B THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA , CALIFORNIA • I -·,-..=. 1 t. -- .- !. ----- ;. ..... . . 1.---, r-:: TOP OF RIDGE RAISED PLATE HEIGHT I ST FLOOR PlA TE HEADER ' +I ' <'I � 0 co 1ST F.F� I I FINISH GRADE I A 4.10 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 O1chard Drive, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 tel.+19495539100 lax +19495530548 www l)as.5en�nlago11i.com Copyrighl2012 8assen�njlagooA1ch�ects 766.12247 645 O C =::::2==•=====::::::8 SCALE: 1/4" = l'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC ,-------------------------7 I I I I I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,----____ T ________ J I I I I ..._.. I l L _________ _ ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3: 12 U.N.O. RAKE: 2" EAVE: 18" ROOF MATERIAL.: 'S' TILE --------7 I I I I l I I I ________ J r--------------7 I I / I .L'>... I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I : � : I I L r-____ _J L-..::=------....L....:..��__J=-.____J I B -ANDALUSIAN PLAN 1B THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 4.11 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 On!wdll!M,,S.le 100N...,, Beadl,CAUSA 92660 l!l.•19495539100 lax+l 9495530548 wwwbasse!magooioom Coo),ighl2011�"""1ecis 766.12247 646 O 2 4 _e SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC FRONT REAR ANDALUSIAN 11◄'•1'.0' PLAN IXB THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA I CALIFORNIA TOP OF RIDGE ' 2ND FLA.. Pl.A TE HEAOER __ 2N_D_f.f.,_ =7 ISTRR.Pi.ATE _::::: +I HEADER t ISTFF. A 4.12 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 20!1°"'"110....S.,, 11111 N""'°"Bead1,CAIIS.l 9Ml lel•ll,ll�Jtl(ll fa.<•19'Hll(64.I www.bastetianlag(n.o,m �21112ea ...... 1L,go,;- 766.12247 647 LEFT RIGHT 0:::=::!:2 =::::;•:====:::8 SCALE: IW = l'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC Ill Ill ••• Ill .RLMII{� I 'I \II'''\ 11 'I II• I Ill Ill Ill Ill ±72'-8" Ill PLAN IXB THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 1111 I II 1111 II II TOP OF RIDGE 2ND FLR PLATE HEADER I lNDf.f. ISTFLR.,0.TE I_ ili � � +1 :.... � '\! r-l'i' -' -�rt O �co ISTFF Fl,NJ$H GRADE l A 4.13 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Su�e 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 fax +19495530548 www bassenianlagom com Copyrighl.2012 BassenianllagoniArchnects 766.12247 648 0:::=::::2 =:::::◄ ===::::::8 SCALE: IW = l'--0" POINTE LARSON, LLC /, REi\H1iULOi I l' �I'''\ I' j ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3: 12 U.N.O. RAKE: 2" EAVE: 18" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE -----y--------- --------7 I I I I I I I I ________ J r--'---------7 I I I ◄ I I I r------I I I I I I I I I I I 4 ! I I I I L_ ____ _ I I I I I I I I ______ J ► I I I I _____ _J I XB -ANDALUSIAN PLAN IXB THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 4.14 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 On:lllld OIM!, Sli1e 100 Ne.,,., Beadl, CA USA 92660 lel+194g5539100 tax+fM95S3054B wwwba�.oom Coo),igM2011Bassenan.1.agoriAttt,taets 766.12247 649 40'-6" 20'-S 1/2" 19'-6 1/2" 0 MASTE . I BATH BEDROOM2 I I! X 12!. <:::;,o:�----------------��� MASTER Do O : : 19� xi� 0OUTDOORO o· lf�� 9v0.,, LIVING . I 1:: ;:,, 0 "' "'' I r: �L=== __ ===_===_�l__r:=-1--== GARAGE 20± x2oi 20'-I I" I I I I 0 □O GREATU 01 ROOM 26Q x22! 0 Doo 40'-6" . CART GARAGb-c 101 7.2 11 '-4 1/2" FIRST FLOOR 2, 7 5 8 S. F. 40'-6" 20'-7 1/2" BALCONY 20'-I I" 40'-6" 19'-I0 1/2" OPEN TO BELOW REF. [.I OPEN f TO f. BELOW □ OPEN TO BELOW LOFT 132. X 15.! 0 SECOND FLOOR 0 P T. 5 8 5 S. F. 3 , 3 4 3 S. F. FIRST FLOOR OPT . 0 rn P L A N 2A / 2XA -2, 7 5 8 S. F. A 4.15 0::::, =::::::==!::::::===�� SCALE: 1/4" = l'--0" POINTE LARSON, LLC RE,\IB�J t ti \11· , \ I 1 , i THE ESTATES LA QUINT A , CALIFORNIA 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHIHCTURE •PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Ordlanl Dri.,. Sooe 100 Ne>poi18'ad\ CA USA 92660 lei. +1 949 553 9100 ra� +19495530548www bassenianlagoni com Cop)Tlgt,12011 Bass£iniaM.agoniArthilects 766.12247 650 FRONT TUSCAN l/4"af'.0" ,;:: REAR PLAN 2A i:0 :::j2t::::::t4 ====:i8 SCALE: 114" = I ·-o· THE ESTAT ES POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA T0P0HOGE RAISED PLATE HEIGHT GREAT ROOM IWSED Pl.ATE HUGfjr CII HA51'UI. MDOOOH 1ST FLOOR PLATE = HEADER . = : ' ' <'I <';I 0 00 JST F.F FINISH GRADE a;-- +I A 4.16 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 ()ch.,dDriv<, Slit, 100 Newpon B,,dl, CA USA 92660 tel.<+19-495539100 faxi19495530548 wwwbassenian�rom �12012ea ... nianllaQofi-ecli 766.12247 651 LEFT RIGHT 0:::::, =::r:l =:::::1 ===:::I ,CALE: 1/4" = I '-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC 111 111 111 111 111 111 .·111 111 l··-1·.-. ,-·. . PLAN 2A THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA I CALIFORNIA ■■■■•••• •••• ••■ ••• ••• ••• ••• ■■ ■■■ i ,, r' I I I ' I : I I ! To,o, KIOGt �AlSED PLATE HEIGHT Ulil\£ATAOOM IWSEO PLA TE.!'IEIGHT 0 MA>TU IEOAOOM I ST FLOOR PLATE HEADER . ' , "' • N ..:. +I � 0 co ISTF.F, HNrutGMCE A 4.17 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 01chard Drive, Su1le 100 N�por1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+lti-195539100 fax+19495530548 www,bassenianlagonicorn Copvrigh\2012 Bassenian I Lagoni Arch�ecls 766.12247 652 POINTE LARSON, LLC ,------------7 I I I I I I -------------7 l ►I I l I I I I I I I ----I I I I I I I I I I I � !---�------------� I I I I I I I I I ..-.. I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I � I I I I I I I L ________ I _______ �I I I I I I I I ◄ ►II III II II I -1 '1 ____ L ________ 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ;: I T I I i I I I I i I I I I ru I I I'-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ..._.. I I I I ........ I I I I I I I I I L ____________ L __________ JxJI ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 6" EAVE: 18" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE ......- 2A-TUSCAN PLAN 2A THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 4.18 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTUIE •PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 0!d!acd 0rr..,s.1, 100N-1Beadl. CAIJSA 92660 l!l.+-19495S39100 fax+19495530548 VNMbassenianlagooioom Cop�hl20118asserian<tagoo1Alth1'c• 766.12247 653 IWSlO l'IATf fl!lt;HT @G�fAHOOM 1ST F.f, FRONT ) j C ) J REAR PLAN 2XA THE ESTAT ES O C ::::i2t:::::t◄====:::i8 SCALE: I/◄"= 1'-0" -----=====:::;;;;::::;;;;;;;;;::::=:;;=;;;;::::==:;�==================- POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA TUSCAN 1/4"':f'.(). l) I TOP Of RIDGE 2ND FLR.. Pt.ATE HEADER = � -;-r:. °' = +r HEADER = = -;- N 1ST F.F, �N'Vt t;lllJ)E I A 4.19 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE· PLANNING• INTERIORS 20310odwdDrive, S.,, 100N"""'11leaci1,CAUSA 92600 tal.+19495539100 fax.+19495530548 Wfibassenianlagonrom c,,p,iJh12012eas,,,oollag<riAld1lecls 766.12247 654 t:=::::2==�t::===:::8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ LEFT RIGHT POINTE LARSON, LLC ■■ ■■■■■•••• ■■ ■ I II I PLAN 2XA THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA , CALIFORNIA ±58'-0 1/2" ••• ••• ••• ••• : I ■■■••• I ' ■■■••• r' ', I I ■■ ■ ' ■■■■-I I TOP OF RIDGE 2ND FLR. PLATE HEADER I . � ' +I HEADER .' ":' 0 00 ISTF.F f!Nl!>IGRADE A 4.20 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 01chard Drive, Su�e 100 NewJl()rl Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+194955.39100 lax+19495530548 www ba�ianlagoni..com Cop)irighl2012 BassenianllagcrliArthilecls 766.12247 655 POINTE LARSON, LLC ,------I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------7 - I I I -------------7►I I I I I I I ---I I I I I I I r---�------------� I I I I I ..-. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '<;7 I I I I I L--------,-------� 1/ I I I I ►IIIII I ,----L--------7 I I I I I I �i I T I I I I -�------------�ru I ..... I ' I j � I I I iI I I I I ""'7'" I I I I .._.. I I 01------------I � L ___________ 1 I I ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 6" EAVE: 18" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE I I I ---I I I L ___________ J 2XA-TUSCAN PLAN 2XA THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 4.21 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 On!lard -• S.ie 100 N,""°" Bea:11, CA USA 926EO l!l.•19495539100 fu+19495530548 wwwbasseriaregcrlicom Copjrighl2011Bassena,,t,gonIA<thl""5 766.12247 656 0--. I MASTE BATH , BA 2 20'-5 1/2" I I 40'-6" 19'-6 112" 0 700 GREAT(l-0ROOM \ / , 26� x22i 1,, . � .- Q 000 221 X 17± COeD BEDROOM 2 Iii Xl2� GARAGE 20± x20.1 A ENTRY JR MASTER/ CASITA 13 3 x12! CART GARAGE::-: IO·l X 7! 20'-7 112" 16'-6 112" 40'-6" FIRST FLOOR 2, 7 5 8 S. F. 40'-6" 20'-7 112" OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 19'-10 112" LOFT nl x1sl 0 19'-I" SECOND FLOOR 0 PT. 5 8 5 S. F. 3 , 3 4 3 S. F. FIRST FLOOR OPT. P L A N 2 B / 2XB -2, 7 5 8 S. F. A 4.22 :::::0 =::::!:2 ==4:::::===::::!8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" THE ESTATES POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orctlard Drive, Suite 100 Newpor1 Beach, CA USA 92660 tel.+19495539100 rax+1949553054B www bassenianla�ni com Copy<igh!2011 BasseniarillagoniArchilecls 766.12247 657 FRONT ANDALUSIAN l/◄":1•-0· 111r ·111r 111r 111r 1111 REAR PLAN 2B 0t:::::i:2 :::::J4t::::==::i8 SCALE: 114": l'-0" THE ESTAT ES POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA TOPOF�IOCE I ST FLOOR PL.A TE HEADER 1ST FF FINISH GRADE A 4.23 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 On;ha,d Drive, Sole 100 Nowp<X1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 fax+194955J0546 wwwbassenianlagonicom Copyrighl20128assenianjl.aptiArr.hi!ecb 766.12247 658 O 2 ◄ 8 :::=:::::=::::===::: SCALE: 1/4" = l'-0" LEFT RIGHT POINTE LARSON, LLC {t -----..- •iTt· ·..::..:,,..• ' I II I I I PLAN 2B THE ESTAT ES LA QUINT A , CALIFORNIA 1i[ ■ 1i[■ ■■■ ■■■■■■ ' i ■■■ ( ■■ I ■■■! ' I \ I I 'I I i : TOP OF RIDGE RAISED PLATE HEIGHT 1ST FLOOR P'lATE c;> HEADER +I-' ' • � C) co 1ST F,F FlN11H GRADE A 4.24 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 20:J10<chardDfr\le,Suile100NewportBeach,CAUSA 92660 lel.+194955J9100 rax +194955J0548 wwwbassenianlagooi.com Copyrighl 2012 8assenian I Lagori Arch�ecls 766.12247 659 0:::=:±2 =:::::i4t:===:::::':8 SCALE: 1/4" = l'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC <J REMBOLD 1 l ,,\!I'-;' I �I r------------7 I I I I I I I I I ► I I I I I I I I I -----------7 I I I I I I ,---�------------� L--------,-------� ,----L _______ 7 I I I I I I I L _________ _ ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3: 12 U.N.O. RAKE: 2" EAVE: 1 8" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE I I ........, I I L ___________ J 28 -ANDALUSIAN PLAN 2B THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 4.25 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Dri'Je, Suite 100 Ne¼l)Ort Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 fax+19495530546 www bassenianlagoni com Copyr�hl2011 BasseniartllagonlArchitects 766.12247 660 FRONT 1ST F.F� REAR O i:: =:fl==.._◄"-_-_-_-�-"8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC ANDALUSIAN 1/1"=1'-0" (»» ----,--�-Il PLAN 2XB THE ESTAT ES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA .... TOP OF RIDGE 2ND FLA.. PlA TE HEADER . � 2NDFJ. q ISTFl.11. n ;!j +I HEADE� . � ISTFF, flN'SHCMOE A 4.26 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING· INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Sui1e 100 Newpl)i Beadl, CA USA 92660 lel.•113-495539100 tax+1!}4955J05-1B www bassernanlagoo oom Copyrighl2012BassenianllalJOOiArdiilecls 766.12247 661 LEFT RIGHT to ==±==:::=====�a SCALE: 1/4" = l"-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC I■ ■ ■ Ill Ill Ill 1111 ' ' PLAN 2XB THE ESTATES LA QUINTA I CALIFORNIA ±58'-0 1/2" e -tt:-� ¼ ......... ••• ••• ••• ••• • ••• 11 1 :' fB••ti \ / I � : : ' ' I i i TOP OF RIDGE 2ND FLR. PLATE HEADER � 2ND FJ � 1ST FLR.f :TE N +I HEADER !... I "t C) a:> ISTFF flN�t◄GIIIAOE A 4.27 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Suite 1!)() Newporl Beoch, CA USA 92660 1el,+194955J910D rax+19495530548 1vww bassernanlagon\com Copyright 2012 Bassenoo I Lagoni Archilects 766.12247 662 0;::=:±2 ==it:===:::i8 SCALE, 1/4"; 1 '-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC �------1----►-7 I �------------�------------7 I I I I I I I I I I I I � ► I I I I I I I I I I I �----------------,--------� I I ► ,----L_ _______ 7 I I I ) I I 4 ► I I ��----------- 1 I I I I L __________ _ ROOF PLAN PITCH, 3,12 U,N.O, RAKE, 2" EAVE, 18" ROOF MATERIAL, 'S' TILE L------------__j I l I l I I I I I .._.. I I I L___ _J 7_ ______ _J �--�I L_ ______ _ 2XB-ANDALUSIAN PLAN 2XB THE ESTATES LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 4.28 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Suite 100 Newpor1 Beach, CA USA 92660 tel.+19495539100 fax+1949553054B www basseniarJagoni com Cop�ghl2011 Bassenian/1...agoniArchilects 766.12247 663 AS.01 PLAN AS.02 PLAN AS.03 PLAN AS.04 PLAN AS.OS PLAN AS.06 PLAN AS.07 PLAN AS.08 PLAN AS.09 PLAN AS.IQ PLAN AS.I I PLAN AS.12 PLAN AS.13 PLAN AS.14 PLAN POINTE LARSON, LLC SECTION 5: ARCHITECTURAL PLANS -THE HACIENDAS A/ I XA -FLOOR PLAN AS.IS PLAN 2A/2XA -FLOOR PLAN A -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION AS.16 PLAN 2A -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION A -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION AS.17 PLAN 2A -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION A-ROOF PLAN AS.18 PLAN 2A -ROOF PLAN XA -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION AS.19 PLAN 2XA -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION XA-LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION AS.20 PLAN 2XA -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION XA -ROOF PLAN AS.21 PLAN 2XA -ROOF PLAN B/ I XB -FLOOR PLAN AS.22 PLAN 2B/2XB -FLOOR PLAN B -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION AS.23 PLAN 2B -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION B -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION AS.24 PLAN 2B -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION B-ROOF PLAN AS.2S PLAN 2B -ROOF PLAN XB -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION AS.26 PLAN 2XB -FRONT & REAR ELEVATION XB -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION AS.27 PLAN 2XB -LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION XB -ROOF PLAN AS.28 PLAN 2XB -ROOF PLAN THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 07.02. 13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Cl<dlard Drive, Su�e 1C-O Newpar1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel. +1 949 55J 9100 fa� +1 S-49 553 0548 wwwbas.senianlagomcom Copyri,Jhl 21112 Bassani.;n j lagooi Nd'Mteds 766.12248 664 q 0 '. }/ 10 MASTER BEDROOM 141 X 15± 0 MASTER BATH 35'-0" F-;-0 D ow I � r------------7 1,-----------11 : : ENTRY : l !::! ' TL ____________ •-� L ____________ __, LAU. L _\ " GARAGE 2oi x21 ! X 00 CASITA 1 131 x12! +-\--I- --------------------'--�I 20'-7 1/2" 12'-6 1/2" FIRST FLOOR 2, 0 3 3 S. F. 0i=±=i' ====:::i8 SCALE: IW = 1 '-0" PLAN THE POINTE LARSON, LLC \ ===� PORTICO I I q ---rD_ I A/ I XA -2, 0 3 3 S.F. HACIENDAS LA QUINT A , CALIFORNIA I S'-10 1/2" 14'-4 1/2" '-6 l.\lBEDRO• el x 11 SECOND FLOOR 0 PT. 4 0 I S. F. 2, 4 3 4 S. F. A 5.01 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orch.rd Drive, Su�e 100 Ne1'1fX)11 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.•19495539100 fax+1949SSJ05-48 wwwbas�onicom �20118assenlanitagoniArthlects 766.12248 665 FRONT RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @GREAT ROOM -+I -- +I ST f,f'. REAR O C::: ==it=±===:::::::i8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC TUSCAN 111·=1·.o· 111 PLAN IA THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA , CALIFORNIA TOP OF RIDGE I ST FLOOR PLA fE "? HEADER 1ST FF, 0 <"'I +I FINISHGAADE- A 5.02 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 OrthardOrive,S,Je100NewportBeach,CAUSA 9216() lel.+1!3495539100 fax+194955JOS48 wwwb.1ssenian�gonioom Copyo'9h' 2012 Bessenian I Lagoni All:t;(ecO 766.12248 666 1111 LEFT RAISED PLATE HEIGHT �-- @ CASITA + DEN PORTICO � I -Lil = +I -;-- 0 +I I II I ·1. ISTF,F. RIGHT t==::�==t=====::::!8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC II II II II II II II � II PLAN IA THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA •••• ■■ ■■ RAISED PL.A TE HEIGHT @GREAT ROOM I ST FLOOR PL.A TE HEADER ISTFF 0 N +I A 5.03 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 O1chard Drive, Su�e 100 N�port Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 IID:+19495530548 www.bassenianlagom com Copyrighl2012 BassenianllagooiArcMects 766.12248 667 0t::::t·2==1i:=:==::j8 SCALE: 114" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC <) RF.:V1BOLD l l) \1 l' \ ' , ! ' I ,---------�------------7 ◄ I I I � I I I I :: I I =I I I ..._. I I I L------------7 ► I I I I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I I I I r----------17I /1 I V_.o..l I �I I I .-._ r1 I I I I I '-1' I L J I I-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I ! ! I l l L1-_-_-7� I _....._ IL _____________ n I II I _____ T_J .._. I ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 12" EAVE: 6" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE I [L ___ _J TUSCAN PLAN IA THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 5.04 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 O!t!lard Cme, Soto 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 tel.+19495539100 !ax+19-4955305,¼S www.basseruilagonicom �20118asseniarrugoriA,th:"'1S 766.12248 668 +1 0t::::::i2==±4 ====::J8 SCALE: 111· � I '•O" POINTE LARSON, LLC FRONT C RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @GREAT ROOM -+I ISTF,F, REAR ------- G == □ == == -; I PLAN IXA I THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA TUSCAN l/◄"•.l'•O" TOP OF RIDGE 2ND FLR PLATE HEADER . � ' +I HEADER I . ' b Cl) 1ST FF, FlNKM GRAOE A 5.05 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE· PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Ct-chard Drive, Sutte 100 N� Bealll, CA USA 92660 tel.+19495539100 faxt1S4955J0548 www bassenianla{jOl'li oom C�hl2012BassenianllagoniArdlilecis 766.12248 669 1111 LEFT PORTICO I .1 ..·1·1·· RIGHT t:=:::!1::::=::t====:::8 SCALE: 114" = l'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC �1·� II II PLAN IXA THE HACIENDAS LA QUINT A , CALIFORNIA m ±48'-3 1/2" ■■ ■■ TOP OF fllDGE 2ND FLR PLATE HEADER I 2ND FF Lf'I ---I ST-FL-R.-TE---'+l � b ISTF,F A 5.06 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard OriYe, Sui!e 100 Newpor1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 rax +19495530548 www.bassenianlagonirom Copyrigh12012 8assenianllagonihchiecls 766.12248 670 ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 12" EAVE: 6" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE 0t::::=:t:1 :::::i::4 ==�B SCALE: IW = l'--0" POINTE LARSON, LLC r---------�------------7 I IlI I ' -- l = I .._... I I I I I L------------7 ► IIlII1lllIlIIIIIIII II I I �1 --------�7I I I I I I I I I I I flI I I I I I � I� I I l J I I I== I I I 7 I I I I : I tI I l I l 1 I J I I rr-1 1 IIII I I ..._. I I I L�_-7 -I I I ..-._1 �-------------, ,, I : L :1 I 'i_J ._.. I 7L_ __ _JI IL ____J TUSCAN PLAN IXA THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA. CALIFORNIA A 5.07 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 On!la<d0riw,S....100Ne-,,>(Beadl,CAUSA 92660 tel.+19495539100 fa•+19'95530548 wn�com Cop;og/'12011B�Aldil"'" 766.12248 671 9 b CX) 35'-0" 14'-11" 20'-I" �---------1 I I I I I --1..J"J :.-r,:.-:j 111 I I 11 1 I I 11L I I L'-:.f,1I I I I I 0 + MASTER BEDROOM 14I x 1s.1 0 MASTER BATH J GARAGE / A "''} +J- 20'-7 1/2" },, 1 □-KITCHEi\ 13l x 171 l)W r------.-------, I ,---------, I, I I JI PORCH I I ENTRY /I I L � --=------=-_-_-::--=---:__--'.......1-' ,!'--"h --¥-,-;-,-'---:=----, I I I I I I I DEN LLL-,.. L--­LOPT STAIR CASITA 13I x 12� ===w q L=:::=2==':!.;:!::=�;E=:=='S:==:::::il· �-oc:jj _a:>.......,._1,- 14'-2 1/2" 5'-2" FIRST FLOOR 2, 0 3 3 S. F. PLAN I B / I XB - 2, 0 3 3 S.F. THE HACIENDAS POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINTA , CALIFORNIA "';> ;., 14'-4 1/2" �-------------□--w 0� LOFT • rl,. nlx1og \, ' - r,1_,,,.---+----L-====::::::..i SECOND FLOOR 0 P T. 4 0 I S. F. 2, 4 3 4 S. F. A 5.08 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orthard Drive, Suhe 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+1�95539100 fa�+19495530548 wwwbassenianlagoni.oom Copyright2<l11 Bassenian/LagoniAn;hhects 766.12248 � !::! "';>,.., 672 -' +I 0c:::i:2 ==i4c::==:::i8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC FRONT ANDALUSIAN 1/4"=1'-0" RAISED PLATE HEIGHT � g<;�EAHOOM ] PORTICO �-• 0 0 +I Ill TOP OF RIDGE RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @ MASTER BEDROOM + OUTDOOR LIVING I ST FLOOR PLATE HEADER ' -'ry O +I +I 1ST F.F. �! ISTFF. -�iiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii•-=====::=.;i..i.;;;�� flNIII< dlWl, REAR PLAN 1B THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 5.09 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 G-ct1ard DIM!, Su�e 100 NeY!pOl1 Bead!, CA USA 92660 leL+19495539100 fax+19495530548 wwwbassenianlagonicom Copyrighl20\2Bassenianll.agxliAlthilects 766.12248 673 1111 LEFT ODEN •ENTftY RAISED PLATE HEIGHT ., 0t=:i::1 :::±4 ==:=j8 SCALE: 114" = l'-0" @CMfTA PORTICO Lil � +f � c; +I 0 +I ISTF,F POINTE LARSON, LLC I I I RIGHT II I I I I I I :. ■ I II □ :1111: :11: PLAN 1B THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA TOPOFIJOGE I ST FLOOR PLATE HEADER = CD � 0 CD ISTff_ A 5.10 07.02.1 3 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Su�e 100 NEMJ)Of1 Beach, CA USA 92660 1el.•194955.J9100 rax+19495530548 www.bassenianlagonirom Copyrighl2012 Bassenian]LagoniArchilecls 766.12248 674 ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 18" EAVE: O" ROOF MATERIAL.: 'S' TILE 0t:::::::i::::::i4====::j8 SCALE: I /4" � 1 '-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC <] RE�IBO.LD1 l I) 111'� "\ 11'' ► ► ____________ I ► 7 PLAN 1B THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ANDALUSIAN A 5.1 I 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Ord1ard Dri'le, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 tel.+19495539100 rax +1949553054B wwwbassenianlagonicom Copyright2011 BasseniarulagoniArchitects 766.12248 675 FRONT RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @GREAT ROOM PORTICO --+I +I ISTFF REAR 0c::::::J2i:::::=:±:====:i8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC ANDALUSIAN 11◄"=1"-0- ,l,--­TOP OF RIDGE 2NOFLR.IViTE r HEADER . b +l HEADER Jl" -I . 0 00 ISTF,F. FINISH GRADE PLAN IXB THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA Cl � � 8 :.... +I 0 + A 5.12 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchafd Drive, Sutte 100 N!MpOl1 Beach, CA USA 92680 lel.+19495539100 lax+19495530548 www bassenianlagooi oom C�hl2012BassenianlLagcnArdlilects 766.12248 676 O t: ==2t:=:::Jt::====:::::8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" °' +I 0 � +I m +1 POINTE LARSON, LLC OEA 1ST F.F. 1111 LEFT A ---. -I RIGHT .HI.J\1B(n I <1 ,,1 I' I ��Ji?/ I I ■ I I I 11 .. -.-, I. ■ I ±48'-3 1/2" TOP OF RIDGE KAi§f;O PLATE �UtHl' @GO[AHOOM HEEL TRUSS ■ H!'ADER ISTF.F. AN!rn GRADE PLAN IXB THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ;.,, N +I A 5.13 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard omre, Su�e 100 N�pofi Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 lax+19495530548 www.bassenianlagonicorn Copyrighl 2012 Bassenian I L.agooi Architects 766.12248 677 ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 18" EAVE: O" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE 0t:::=::f2==•t::===:::!8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'--0" POINTE LARSON, LLC ◄ ,------------7 I I I I I I l ' I 1 i I I I l I I I L ____________ _ 1 I j l I I 7 ◄ ► ► PLAN IXB THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 7 I I I I I I ANDALUSIAN A 5.14 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, SUie 100 NewportBeacl1, CA USA 92660 tel.+19495539100 fax+19495530548 www bassenianlagor.i com Copynghl2011 Bassenian/1..agoniAl!:hitects 766.12248 678 I I _J 35'-0 " 0 DB�i�o 13Q x I Bl '' :\ d 'i •.-' , I �& D o ·o ·· MASTER \I BATH 0 JR. MSTR 13.!.!xl 11 S'-0" --CART GARAGE;.<.eL'-x ell PORTICO 20'-3 1/2" 9'-6" I 0'-2 1/2" 40'-0" FIRST FLOOR I , 9 I 6 S. F. BED 4 35'-0" , REF • -----------□ LOFT 13� X 18.!.!000 □ BALCONY OPEN TO BELOW J-______ 20_'-_5_1_/2_" ______ --.-_�--' 0 _'-_8'_' ---I- SECOND FLOOR 0 P T. 5 3 I S. F. 2 ,4 4 7 S. F. P L A N 2A / 2XA -I , 9 I 6 S.F. A 5.15 i::=::i:==:i:4 ====:i8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Suile 100 Newpor1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 fax+19'195530548 VNIWbassenianlagonicom Copyr�ht2011 Bassenian/1...agoniArchilects 766.12248 679 0c:::::=i2=::i4:::::::===:i8 SCALE: 114" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @ MASTER BEDROOM -: ' -' +I C) +I PORTICO 1ST FF. FRONT IT REAR TUSCAN I14"=I',0" ,------------------tm!..=� - --;------T..;;.O"-PO"'-F.;..;Rl"-DG;;cE....31� RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @ OUTDOOR LIVING 1ST FLOOR PLATE HEADER -' ISTFF PLAN 2A THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 5.16 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 OrthardOINl!,Suite 100Newpof1.Beadl,CAUSA 92660 tel.+19495539100 fai:+19495530548 wwwbasser.ia111agonitoo1 CO!'Jl',jhl 1012 Bassenian I Lagoni A1cMeds 766.12248 680 ,t.Am.D PLATE HEIGHT @JR. MASTER + DEN = ' +I 0i::::::±::::i====:::::J8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'--0" ISTFF RIGHT POINTE LARSON, LLC LEFT I] I- - I.,.,__ I _- -�-- . - ••• ••• ■■■■■■ ■■ ■■■II -• II -- I■ PLAN 2A THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA I■ •• •• •• •• TOP OF RIDGE RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @ MASTER BEDROOM 1ST FLOOR PLATE HEADER : '' :..� b ISTFF. A 5.17 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCKITEtru!E • PLANIIIN6 • llllf81 □8S 2031 Orchard Drive, Su�e 100 Newport Beach, CA USA � lel.+19495539100 rax•1'9!-�§:Sl� www.bassenianlagoni.com Copyrighl2012 BassenianllagoniArchitecls 766.12248 681 t:0 =i::2 =:i:◄====:i8 SCALE: 1/4"= l'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC ,--------7 I l I I I II ,-------------� l I II I I I I f------- 1I I �--- 1 I I I I 1 I ► 7 I I I I I I ,---------u II I I I I I I I I r-7I I --7 I..-.. I I I L ___________ _ ______ _j I ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 6" EAVE: 18" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE t-------,-1 1 I I I :L ____________ _J TUSCAN PLAN 2A THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 5.18 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Ordiard Drive, Suile 100 Newpor1 Beach, CA USA 92660 1e1.+194sssJ9100 rax+1�essJos4e www,bassenianla�.com Copy�h(2011 Bassenianll..agoriiArt::hilecis 766.12248 682 0t::::::i:::::::±:==:::::::i8 SCALE: 114" = l'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC - RAISED Pl.ATE HEIGHT @ MASTER BEDROOM , = ' PORTICO - o+I +I ISTFF. REAR FRONT I■ .. ■ r--1 1■■1 1l-l 1 PLAN 2XA THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA TUSCAN IW=l',0" TOP OF RIDGE 2ND FLR PLATE HEADER I o ---IST_FL_R,PU.-U--"1.-� ----'=�1.-+1 HEADER ISTFF FINISH GRADE A 5.19 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PlANNING • INTERIORS 20310rcJiardDrive,Suite100Newpol1Beach,CAUSA 92660 !el.+19495539100 rax+19495530548 wwwbasservanlagonicom Copyr,'Jht2012 Bassenian I LagoniArdlil&ls 766.12248 683 0t:, =iY==r====::5f ,cALE: 114• = 1·-0· POINTE LARSON, LLC LEFT []_::.I] -II ----•• -11 .-II RIGHT --· -·-■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ * ••• --­■■■•••■■■ □ ll ---I■ ■ ll- [DI ±48'-4 I /2" TOP OF RIDGE 2ND FLR PLATE 0 1� II II �=f-:b:=J�v:-=:�r-=--=-"-'-''ir''--"-"-i:r-="i:f"='-'=ir=���i:P'-.:1::..---"-c-�����":;:J:;:_�f -=--��i_����J-.... � I HEADER ISTFF. PLAN 2XA THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA '1Nl5>1GMOE A 5.20 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Occhard Drive, Su�e 100 Nffflpor1 Beadi, CA USA 92660 lel.+194955J9100 rax +19495530548 wwwbassenianlagonicom Copyrighl2012 BassenianlLagonlArchilects 766.12248 1�.lll.'ll'JJCl!l� 684 0t:=±::2 =±4 ===:::::!8 SCALE: 114" = 1 '-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC REVIBb L[)' l O \t I'\' 1 l' J ,-------------1-i I I I I I I I .-... l l l I I I I l I ----------7 I � l I I ----------------'---------� I I I I I I I I I l �---------------} I .....,.... L ___________ _ ► ► _ _J -, I ;A..,l l I I l I I I I l ROOF PLAN PITCH: 3:12 RAKE: 6" EAVE: 1 8" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE L ____________ .J TUSCAN PLAN 2XA THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA , CALIFORNIA A 5.21 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Sufte 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 tel.+19495539100 fax+194955J0�8 wwwbassenianlagonicom Coj)yrighl 2011 Basseniarutagoni Arthim 766.12248 685 q co I I ...J 7 I I LAUNCH J.. 35'-0" 0 D MMTE ii';{ BEDROO 13.Q. x 1el '.· �'� GARAGE 20Q x20.1 1 J..1 ·o 0(-., -MASTER 1 : /: BATH 0 0 JR. MSTR 1Jl!x111. +-------------- ( ' I ---, 11I I11 � I I _, I I '-" 1 11 35'-0" REF. LOFT I_'(, BED 4 t •/ .,• 1101 X 10.§. ooo I ·=-i �--.-□ BALCONY 20'-5 1/2" 10'-8" I t-CART : : :__,• 1.-----+--=----------------it.::: =.j--==;,a=GsA=J!RA =x a:;:�1=1:::-==='.L= == PORTICO J 20'-3 1/2" 9'-6" FIRST FLOOR I , 9 I 6 S. F. 0i:::::=::i=:::i4c===::J8 SCALE: 1/4" = l'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC I 0'-2 1/2" SECOND FLOOR 0 P T. 5 3 I S. F. 2 ,4 4 7 S. F. PLAN 2B / 2XB - I, 9 I 6 S.F. A 5.22 THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orciiard Drive, Sui1e 100 Newpor1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 rax+19495530548 WWW bassenianlagoni com Copyrigh\2011 Bassen�n/1..agoniArthilects 766.12248 ::.... 686 FRONT RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @ LIVING + OUTDOOR LIVING -+1 ISTFF. REAR PLAN 2B 0i::::::::i2t=:±:==::::i8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" THE HACIENDAS POINTE LARSON, LLC LA QUINTA , CALIFORNIA ANDALUSIAN 11◄·�1·.o• TOP OF RIDGE I ST FLOOR PLATE HEADER CO 1ST F.f. --+I. ;., � C) FINISH GRADE 1 A 5.23 07.02.IJ Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE· PLANNING• INTERIORS 20J10rchardDrive,S<ite100Newpo,18eadl,C,\US.mol tel.+194955.19\00 ra..•1MUSlOSU www bfflooianlaoc,ni com Cq,)Tg�2012 Ba""10l1li,go!iArchileds 766.12248 687 LEFT RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @JR. MASTER+ DEN +I :.. +I RIGHT Ot==::2t==:r1======::::8 SCALE: 1/4" = l'--0" POINTE LARSON, LLC 1mi r--, I o' i r-t J.-�� ! � i: ! I I I I ' '' I I i I'l i �----, . I ------••• ••• •• ••• '� --­••• ••• • •••• ••• PLAN 2B I THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA B :- TOP OF RIDGE RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @ LIVING + OUTDOOR LIVING RAISED PLATE HEIGHT @ MASTER BEDROOM HEADER :.. ISTFF. FlNliH GRADE +I A 5.24 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, su�e 100 Newporl Beach, tlUS\ V� !el.+19495539100 la.w.•liC)S,]01,1. www bassenianlagoni.com Copyrighl2012 BassenianllagoniArchilects 766.12248 688 t:=:::::2:::=::::4 ====:::::8 SCALE: 1/4" = I '-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC ◄ _____________ _J � ► r I 1 I I I I � I I ► I I I I I f-I ..-. I I I I ROOF PLAN B -ANDALUSIAN PITCH: 3:12 U.N.O. RAKE: 2" EAVE: 18" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE PLAN 2B THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 5.25 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orchard Drive, Su�e 100 Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 tel.+1!34955-39100 fax +194955305-1B www bassenianlagoni com Cop�ghl2011 Bas.senianll..agoniArthilects 766.12248 689 0:::==:::2 ==::::=====::::8 SCALE: 114" = 1'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC REMB0 I <l \I I'"��?/ FRONT . I\AISEO PLATE HEIGHT @ UI/ING + OUTDOOR LIVING RAISED Pl.ATE HEIGHT @MASTER BEDROOM +I :_ +I 1ST FF. REAR �----------------- PLAN 2XB THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA , CALIFORNIA ANDALUSIAN 1/4"=1',0" �OPO'RIOGE 2NOFLR S'l.ATE HEADER 1 : ':a ' r-:. a- 2NDFF 1ST FLR. +I HEADER : 0 (X) ISTFF A 5.26 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS :3\��0:,,cli5'" 100 Neoporte..r�·,��:;sl� W-N#bilssenianlag)niCMl Copyighl2012Bassenia,ll"!l)ni!itni1eds 766.12248 690 .. "' .... �.(" I; .. -�- LEFT 2ND FLR PLATE HEADER . ,;.. '\> +I tsT +I RIGHT O ._>-_-_.....;1t:=:;j.::-====.:::8 SCALE: 1/4" = l'-0" POINTE LARSON, LLC �.;;,,._, 'Iii' J----� ' ' I I ' ' : . :,. •. -= •••• ••• ••• I I I I PLAN 2XB THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA , CALIFORNIA ±48'-4 1/2" .:. I■ ■ I■■ B ' -,1, ::.J TOP OF RIDGE I M!SEO Pl.ATE H£1GHT (J LMNG • Oi.rTOOOK UVING I\AJSED PlATE HEIGHT @ MI\STtl\ BEDROOM ' - ISTFF. = ' - +l flNll>H,UOt A 5.27 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Orctiard Drive, SuAe 100 Newprn1 Beach, CA USA 92660 lel.+19495539100 rax+19495530548 www bassenianlagoni com COl)J'right2012 aa�ianllagOllArctitects 766.12248 691 0 1 4 8 t:=:r==::::===:::::: SCALE: IW = l'--0" POINTE LARSON, LLC ◄ ► _____________ _J ◄ ► ROOF PLAN B-ANDALUSIAN PITCH: 3:12 U.N.O. RAKE: 2" EAVE: 18" ROOF MATERIAL: 'S' TILE PLAN 2XB THE HACIENDAS LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA A 5.28 07.02.13 Bassenian I Lagoni ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 2031 Oldlard[m,Sde ,oo.....,,.,Beach,CAUSA 92660 lel.+19t95S39100 fax+19495530548 VNMbasseriarbgJni.com Cojl)!\j,12011 Basse,ia,ugonl "1;- 766.I2248 692 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS -Qc;;';:,'.'°.;'," :,";'•-c, 949.261 .2070 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 La Quinta, CA LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. SHEET INDEX: C-1 COVER SHEET & INDEX SITE PLAN S-1 SITE PLAN/ PHASING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL-PLANS & ELEVATIONS A-1 1A FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN A-2 1A SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS ARCHITECTURAL -COLORED ELEVATIONS E-1A COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 1A A-3A-4A-5 1 B & 1 C PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLAN 1B SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS 1C SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS E-1B COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 1BE-1C COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 1CE-2A COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 2AE-2B COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 2BE-2C COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 2CE-3A COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 3A A-S 2A FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN A-7 2A SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS A-B 2B & 2C PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLAN A-9 2B SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS A-10 2C SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS E-3B COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 3BE-3C COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 3CE-4A COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 4AE-4B COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 4BE-4C COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 4CE-5A COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 5A A-11 3A FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLANA-12 2A SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-13 2B & 2C PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLANA-14 2B SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-15 2C SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS E-5B COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 5BE-5C COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 5CE-SA COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN SAE-SB COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN SBE-SC COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN SCE-7A COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 7A A-1S 4A FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLANA-17 4A SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-1B 4B & 4C PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLANA-19 4B SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-20 4C SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS E-7B COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 7BE-7C COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN 7CE-BA COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN BAE-BB COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN BBE-BC COLORED ELEVATION -PLAN BC A-21 5A FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN A-22 5A SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-23 5B & 5C PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLANA-24 5B SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-25 5C SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS A-2S SA FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLANA-27 SA SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-2B SB & SC PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLANA-29 SB SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-30 SC SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS A-31 7A FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLANA-32 7A SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-33 7B & 7C PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLANA-34 7B SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSA-35 7C SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS A-3S BA FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLANA-37 BA SIDE ELEVATIONSA-3B BA REAR ELEVATIONA-39 BB PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLANA-40 BB SIDE ELEVATIONSA-41 BB REAR ELEVATIONA-42 BC PARTIAL FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLANA-43 BC SIDE ELEVATIONSA-44 BC REAR ELEVATION Cover Sheet/ Index WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary C-1 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4693 ISLEWORTHCHAMPI O NS W AY CHAMPIONS WAYCHAMPIONS WAYPGA BOULEVARDPLATINUM WAYROYAL OAKS WAYPLATINUM WAYPLATINUM WAYPGA BOULEVARDPGA BOULEVARDROYAL OAKS WAYSIGNATURE WAYSIGNATURE WAYLOT 952827262524232221201918171615141312111098765457565554535251504948474645444342403938313029282736353433324182838485868788899091921819202122232425263738123456891011121314156162636465666768697071727LOT 93LOT 94LOT 96LOT 1312930313233343536375859601231716737475767778798081KIAWAH ISLANDWHISPER ROCK WAYREDSTONE WAY34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20201of9SheetLegend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7SHEET 2 OF 9SHEET 3 OF 9SHEET 4 OF 9SHEET 5 OF 9SHEET 9 OF 9SHEET 8 OF 9SHEET 7SHEET 7 OF 9SHEET 6 OF 9OF 9SHEET 6OF 9Estate Series Plot Plan Data:PlanProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryPlan Count%51021%61327%71226%81226%Total47100%Hacienda Series Plot Plan Data:PlanPlan Count%11729%21627%31627%41017%Total59100%Water Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 3:52:49 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.694 PGA BOULEVARD CHAMPI O NS W AY 335,625 SFPLAN 2A-L345,625 SFPLAN 1A-L355,625 SFPLAN 2A-L368,134 SFPLAN 1A-L3712,105 SFPLAN 5-L3814,588 SFPLAN 6A-L17,748 SFPLAN 1-R27,594 SFPLAN 2A-R310,564 SFPLAN 5-R49,637 SFPLAN 8A-L59,122 SFPLAN 7A-L66,777 SFPLAN 4A-R76,775 SFPLAN 8A-R86,775 SFPLAN 7A-L97,474 SFPLAN 8A-R21'23'50'135'32'18'135'135'50'136'135'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'135'136'85'137'50'135'90'156'137'112'136'156'55'140'55'55'134'15'46'68'125'40'38'102'45'125'45'125'45'125'125'45'125'38'39'41'20'32'108'15'20'15'119'209'55'209'40'38'45'45'45'68'40'50'50'61'19.7'7'5.5'16'10.8'16.1'10.6'5'11.5'20.8'22'5'75.8'24.4'4'8'9.7'23.3'21'28.6'15'46.6'28.3'15'28.8'24.6'7'30.7'21.4'24.6'15'8.1'15.5'14.7'21'5'5'32'16'22.4'36.6'5'5'22.5'7.9'5'26'15'33.8'7.9'5'16.2'24'18.7'8.3'10.4'32.5'26.9'36.6'39.6'14'12'26.2'5'34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20202of9SheetIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7Legend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryWater Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 3:53:41 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.695 PGA BOULEVARD ASDASDASDCHAMPI O NS W AY ISLEWORTH3210'4'6'10'11'4'9,188 SFPLAN 1A-R335,625 SFPLAN 2A-L345,625 SFPLAN 1A-L355,625 SFPLAN 2A-L368,134 SFPLAN 1A-L3712,105 SFPLAN 5-L3814,588 SFPLAN 6A-L278,735 SFPLAN 2A-R286,500 SFPLAN 1A-R296,500 SFPLAN 2A-R306,500 SFPLAN 1A-R317,631 SFPLAN 2A-L6,775 SFPLAN 8A-R86,775 SFPLAN 7A-L97,474 SFPLAN 8A-R323.3'12.8'23.3'10'6'PGA BO U L E V A R D135'18'135'80'135'50'136'135'50'136'50'136'50'136'68'125'40'38'102'45'125'45'125'45'125'45'125'45'125'45'125'38'74'77'15'64'125'46'15'21'5'100'60'130'50'130'50'130'50'130'50'130'50'130'50'130'39'41'130'77'55'137'86'135'50'135'50'135'135'51'119'209'209'40'38'45'45'45'68'101'50'50'61'33.8'11.8'15.1'5'4'23'21'11'10.9'6'4'24.3'11'21'24.3'11'21'23'25.7'27.6'10.9'6'4'11'10'12'13.7'12.7'4'6'11'10'24.3'11'4'16'26.6'23'21'11'4'15.9'10'16'10'15.9'11'10'24.3'5'4'23'21'24.3'10'11'20'16.5'20'16'10'7.9'18.7'1032.5'15'26.9'10'4'15.9'522.4'5'16'34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20203of9SheetIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7Legend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryWater Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 3:54:37 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.696 RELOCATEWATERMETERRELOCATESEWERLATERAL34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20204of9SheetIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7Legend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryWater Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 3:55:04 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.697 CHAMPIONS WAYROYAL OAKS WAY 17EX. RESIDENCE867,173 SFPLAN 5-L8712,012 SFPLAN 6A-L887,158 SFPLAN 5-L897,155 SFPLAN 5-L907,155 SFPLAN 6A-L917,155 SFPLAN 6A-L927,420 SFPLAN 5-L616,804 SFPLAN 7A-R626,775 SFPLAN 8A-L636,775 SFPLAN 7A-R646,775 SFPLAN 8A-L656,775 SFPLAN 7A-R666,775 SFPLAN 8A-L678,808 SFPLAN 7A-R688,326 SFPLAN 8A-L6910,038 SFPLAN 7A-R10'10'10'4'9'10'37'136'60'136'50'136'74'139'136'44'48'138'139'74'135'138'34'46'136'135'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'136'50'137'50'136'55'133'55'135'53'135'53'135'53'135'53'135'53'135'53'135'53'135'53'136'141'136'136'53'136'53'135'53'135'53'135'135'134'34'53'50'50'50'50'15'5'26'5'5'22.8'42.8'36.6'39.6'5'5'16'22.4'22.5'36.5'5'5'26'15'36.6'39.6'5'5'16'33'22.4'15'22.5'36.5'26'5'5'41'38'21'14.6'8.7'5'22.7'36.6'15'25.8'5'6'33.6'47.5'16'22.6'7.3'8'15'25.9'7.9'30.6'44.2'26.6'29.6'7.5'5'26'32.4'8.1'5'15'26'7.7'22.5'16.1'4'9'13.8'22.4'13.5'21'13.5'4'9'20.6'10'6'15'4'6.1'4'21.8'12.9'21'23.2'4'18.9'10'9'4'18.9'23.2'21'10'23.3'13.8'4'9'4'9'23.3'13.8'11'11'20.9'21'23.2'34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20205of9SheetIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7Legend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryWater Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 3:55:52 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.698 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20206of9SheetIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7Legend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryWater Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 3:56:19 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.699 LOT 94PGA BOULEVARD98,695 SFPLAN 4A-R525,807 SFPLAN 1A-L515,795 SFPLAN 2A-L118,695 SFPLAN 4A-R108,545 SFPLAN 3A-R88,695 SFPLAN 3A-R77,026 SFPLAN 4A-R66,588 SFPLAN 3A-R56,919 SFPLAN 4A-R47,842 SFPLAN 3A-R58EX. RESIDENCE59EX. RESIDENCE575,851 SFPLAN 1A-L565,978 SFPLAN 2A-L556,355 SFPLAN 1A-L546,262 SFPLAN 2A-L5310,820 SFPLAN 1A-L605,802 SFPLAN 2A-L5'5'5'45'5.3'6'26.1'4'33'PLATINUM WAY33'2 4 '115'45'130'30'145'145'42 '5'3 0 '5'9 '145'145'80'145'145'80'145'145'53'145'40'149'45'145'46'153'2'5'43'149'160'22'5'28'153'125'125'49'125'134'119'143'45'134'46'137'46'143'46'130'137'45'130'45'130'45'50'45'46'4 0 '4 0 '40' 40'43'45'44'44'168'5.5'4'12'6'26.3'14'10'4'6'15.9'10'6'23'21'16.9'10'24.1'12'7.5'4'6'23'10'4'6'28.2'22.2'6'19.2'10'4'6'9.3'4'7.5'6'12'19.5'33'19.2'19.1'58'5'10'21'24.3'46.7'24.7'16'45'5'5'19.9'23'45'5.2'17.5'11.1'5'45'5.1'16.8'10.5'5'19.1'34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20207of9SheetIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7Legend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryWater Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 3:57:19 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.700 ROYAL OAKS WAYPLATINUM WAYPG98,695 SFPLAN 4A-R525,807 SFPLAN 1A-LPGA BOULEVARD515,795 SFPLAN 2A-L505,700 SFPLAN 1A-L495,653 SFPLAN 2A-L485,942 SFPLAN 1A-L475,940 SFPLAN 2A-L186,937 SFPLAN 3A-R176,966 SFPLAN 3A-R167,517 SFPLAN 4A-R156,917 SFPLAN 4A-R146,786 SFPLAN 3A-R136,786 SFPLAN 3A-R127,358 SFPLAN 3A-R118,695 SFPLAN 4A-R108,545 SFPLAN 3A-R88,695 SFPLAN 3A-R77,026 SFPLAN 4A-R546,262 SFPLAN 2A-L5310,820 SFPLAN 1A-L45'18.9'PLATINUM WAY145'145'50'145'145'50'145'146'50'145'146'49'150'39'33'118'44'145'29'5'21'150'145'49'145'145'49'145'145'24'34'145'145'80'145'145'42'5'30'5'9'145'145'145'145'145'145'145'40'145'122'4125'50'3'123'125'52'125'45'125'46'125'125'125'125'49'125'125'49'125'134'119'143'45'134'46'143'45'46'45'43'43'44'44'40'40'4 0 '4 0 '43'45'44'44'168'47'5.2'5'19.1'40'45'5'16.8'10.5'5.1'5'45'45'45'45'45.1'49.7'45.4'10.3'5.1'5'11.1'17.2'5.1'5'14.9'21.5'5.1'5'22.8'18.5'33'18.4'22.8'5.1'5'17.4'22.6'6'15.3'11.6'4'9.4'22.8'6.2'6.4'10'4'6'23.7'20.9'14.3'4'6.1'7.7'6.7'21'10'4'6'11.9'23.9'21.8'9'4'6.1'10'4'21.5'23.9'23'10'6'22.9'5.7'5'23'19.2'5.4'45'34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20208of9SheetIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7Legend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryWater Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 4:06:25 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.701 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.comMSA CONSULTING, INC.OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN: PGA WEST SIGNATUREWOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP, LLCOCTOBER 6, 20209of9SheetIndex MapN.T.S.SHEET 2SHEET 4SHEET 5SHT.PGA BOULEVARD6SHEET 6PGA BOULEVARD SHEET 7SHEET 8SHEET 9SHEET 3SHEET 7Legend:Proposed and Existing Masonry Wall335,625 SFPLAN 3-LLot AreaPlan Number / Elevation letter /Garage Handing (L - Left or R - Right)Existing Sewer LineExisting Water LineExisting SCE and Joint TrenchExisting Storm DrainProposed Shared Use EasementExisting Right-Of-WayExisting Lot LineExisting Public Utility EasementExisting Tract 32233-4 BoundaryWater Meter or Sewer Lateral RelocationR:\2215\Woodbridge\Acad\Planning\Exhibits\Plot Plan\2215 Overall Preliminary Plot Plan.dwg, 10/6/2020 4:07:16 PM, ddewegeli, MSA Consulting, Inc.702 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 1AE-1AScheme 1703 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 1BE-1BScheme 2704 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 1CE-1CScheme 3705 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 2AE-2AScheme 4706 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 2BE-2BScheme 5707 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 2CE-2CScheme 6708 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 3AE-3AScheme 7709 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 3BE-3BScheme 8710 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 3CE-3CScheme 9711 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 4AE-4AScheme 10712 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 4BE-4BScheme 11713 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 4CE-4CScheme 12714 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 5AE-5AScheme 2715 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 5BE-5BScheme 3716 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 5CE-5CScheme 1717 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 6AE-6AScheme 5718 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 6BE-6BScheme 6719 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 6CE-6CScheme 4720 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 7AE-7AScheme 8721 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 7BE-7BScheme 9722 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 7CE-7CScheme 7723 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 8AE-8AScheme 11724 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 8BE-8BScheme 12725 LA QUINTA - CA.LA QUINTA HOMES949.261.207020250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660HANNOUCHEARCHITECTSSAMIR HANNOUCHE, ARCHITECTCOPYRIGHTCPROJECT # 2020010PreliminaryWoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691949-348-8162DATE: 9/21/2020PLAN 8CE-8CScheme 10726 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2 020010 DATE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 w "'□ ii: ► "{IL::.=====i.;--� �----.... 1! 11 .. ROOF PLAN SL= 5:12 L __ PLAN 1A 1,773 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. ---------_____________ _J FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-1727 T.P. T.0.S T.P. T.O.S T.P. � T.O.S l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC,A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 ICII PLAN 1A REAR ELEVATION 1C 1G □ 1C 1G T.P. T.O.S PLAN 1A LEFT SIDE ELEVATION D PLAN 1A RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION =7 I I I I I =_J LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. B loQiw loQJnto,Cd'ono --"""" ..__ "------· --- ":__� ... M,.U ... -- �..!� M"" .. ... 10 11 ..... 1Z .. M� --.... IIO't,.,._.,...,.,..� --- -•w.-_ ••= �� -�·,-·.�"' �-·� .... _ =:.� ---- -"'l't"'C..��1111�---��-- ,---- ---- �--=- ,.., "" ·--:=::�==���=�-'llfflll::=::::,:D��IDft'dt:111'11'�:..:::;:.:i----•r.t----.iWcl-:====::...�r;w--"M'f"�..,..,. 9"----• �Y'CUllc,,t,:u:;tr0,01Cl"'09"JJuC�D!O!IO�m:ru • M011:a"ic---co-1a.c.� .... ---io:.C11 .. � Pftlf,-:--,0.,,0,,,.,,.,,., .. _,��,,..., Wood Bridge T.P. � T.O.S ELEVATIONS 16 Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-2728 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2 020010 DATE: 9 /.;_1/2020 PLAN 1B SL= 5:12 ROOF PLAN GARAGE ===• PLAN 1C SL= 5:12 i--1\---� LIVING R90M i \ / i I I X I ... ,-,-,-----ht� �"��LAU. -1==:; POW '.:."�j l__ J GARAGE L __________________________ _J L __________________________ _J PLAN 1B PLAN 1C FLOOR PLAN 1,773 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. Wood Bridge FLOOR PLANS 16 Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-3729 T.P. T.0.S T.P. T.O.S T.P. l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST_ #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 ICII 2C PLAN 1B REAR ELEVATION 2C 2G 2C 2G T.P. T.0.S PLAN 1B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 0 □□□□ PLAN 1B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION =7 I I I I I =_J LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. B la�a loQJfWO.ColJoirio --"""' """" ------�---.. 1,�7WJ -·- ,., -·- -,.-, .. 10 ---",_ 12 .. -·---.,._. .. .._.._...._a.n-•M-.q-,i.:,r,111;tbl-�..___,.,.M.'(!)O-.;,:._,.�,I-IOt!o --...,,. --, - ;;;_-, ... ' --- ........,, .... L<o ....... �.....,,..,- ......... C-�ldlbl' �--- --- 0 ...,_ -- ,-. ,.., "" -- :==.��:::::.�--:.�--�.�­::==::.=.:'!Oo-�IO-... -=--':..ID::.=�----a��._,- •IIQ,,GVlf,tO-,O�OO,lpl)OIQ,Q;ler-"Mi,al,frlo9,,tf'9'19,oU •�111a�1111mf'll.r.lAOIDI'� ���-• �....:UOC..l:lul:nrQ.OICftlllllD.o::ftl'V-IDCJl!il'¥'0m:n:,, "l,t:,,'IC,lic--.-11ooo.�._,_,,.,.�'11Pl!l��-=--,:,,_.o,rni:-:i,,'l'J,..M�bf".....- Wood Bridge T.P. T.0.S ELEVATIONS 16 Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-4730 T.P. ICII T.0.S T.P. T.O.S � T.P. �= Ir--... . :I j � l!!l l!!l� ...... I� ... -:--,-,---,-ic;, T.0.S = 1,,--- 3E l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R• HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 3A PLAN 1C REAR ELEVATION � � � ... ... r II � � � 3C 3G � -I / I/ i\ \ \ l ........ � T.P. T.0.S 3C 3G PLAN 1C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION loQunlo lO�.CdfoAo __ ....., I--""-. ""' -----· ----coo ....,,_ ,_ ,..,,. ....... _. ,.,-'1,;ti"J!,IJI ....., .. . .. ,.,. .. ...... ,,., �" -·- "" .. -..�, ....., ..... 1�, .. 10 .. --"'""' � -...., ..,-· --..,- 12 .. --... oor,,.._.,....,.llgr"IQinv;nri, •M�IIQl'l•IOr.-�:,,.wr,.....,.,-,'(QO---=-l'Qlf'�,.._ ...,,, -.... �-::"-�·--COW\Ill!.�--­� ,- ,--.� :�cc:::,,�::=�Mru'lloof,,oc,Q._Oofa'_ ,-,.r.., ::==::;::;.,r.-•--a:=:..=::=�-oglQl§'ll ..... 111 ... �illlaQIIQ ====:::..."'t-ew-""" ...... "°"""�---- ' _,.,.S'OIJIIC.-c.,cn,,o.Ol-�PIO'QCIIDll'rQ- ' � ..... ,;..bC-�.._....._,.�Cf ... 1'11;1111')'1'¥ �..;--,,c..-(111....,..., .. 0t�br,.,.,.,, . ---- --·-�" � � T.P. □ D PLAN 1C RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ,== -=; I I I I I "===== ==' LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. B -- 52 T.0.S ELEVATIONS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-5731 Ill' ◄ ► ROOF PLAN SL= 5:12 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 PLAN 2A 1,915 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-6732 T.P. T.O.S T.P. T.O.S T.P. T.0.S l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC,A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 4C 4G 4A lul PLAN 2A REAR ELEVATION 4C 4G T.P. T.O.S 4C 4G PLAN 2A LEFT SIDE ELEVATION □□□ PLAN 2A RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. □ ----· ... ¥1Jf111it ...... ':."':°-�-...... � ..... -.!:'"ft --~····----- �J 2 .. __ '!.'' 3 .. ··-�..:�' _,, .... ·�.'. .. .. _ .... 10 .. J..,_,, 11 �·- 12 .. --­•.W.tl'al1"11t"-.� .... Qlnv.in¥ ,_ ............. ""'"--'"'=--..__,. ,.._ ''''"" . -,-· ..,,.., -=•·-�,,,. ,-- ::CE�::?=:-e-:�=ra.r.,.m., ::=::.::::Dtlt��m::..:..ll:t::::c---.-o__,111._---.a _ _. ==-====::..�O;il;,--------....... �----• SlrDw.-.CUODtlluC!Y'Q.aatrorJJuCfW'VIIDJIIIQCIIM'Qm:nJ "MQl'l:l..,.-Cl'Ofll:lcit,�...,.-.,__,.d,_1'1Tl111:fft/ !!icrrlt-:--,.,..,:i1....:n,•01�bf',,._. 48 = - .-• -= ,-·-- ,---� T.P. --, I I __ _J __ _J Wood Bridge T.0.S ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-7733 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2 020010 DATE: 9 /.;_1/2020 PLAN 2B SL= 5:12 ROOF PLAN PLAN 2C SL= 5:12 GOLF CART GARAGE I i I i I i I L __________________________ _J L __________________________ J PLAN 2B PLAN 2C FLOOR PLAN 1,915 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. Wood Bridge FLOOR PLANS 16 Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-8734 T.P. T.0.S T.P. T.O.S T.P. l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 SC 5G IC II PLAN 2B REAR ELEVATION SC 5G SA T.P. T.0.S SC 5G SA PLAN 2B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION □□ □□□ PLAN 2B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. 10 11 n --.. ,­... ... •,lol!D!P'"' • .._�lfg-1"� ___,19.m i...c-. .� .... �ftdml ""'-"'"=-..... ·-···· ,.,.,, �·. -·' -::;_ ,...-1&:1 ·- �--� � -··[i,t���-.­��-P'ft ,_,. -' ----' - ·"'�-•-a.---ir.-.-.....,-1',o)O,oacolot' ._..., .... :�a::::,.ci::::=..:ieu11DatftoQaw::lc:.:r .... ff'! ::::=::-.;:::ll!C..i:,,:i,Ma1t,-,iN.u.:=:.::.::�---__,1111J•�--=====::...��'Mif�IQMT O--.,I --• �-CiltXuCITQ.01al"'IJ9"�D'IJIIJaM"lQl"ll!!IJ • M:11:11.,.._Cll'll_,,Olf�a.-..-.. llX.-CIPIIIJ'l'IOWI\I �-=--cl---Cllll"BQr'9r•Ol�I¥,.,_. ---, I I __ __J __ __J SB Wood Bridge T.P. T.P. T.0.S ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary -­e,,,_- =-� - "'' ,m :!'!'.:-,,__ A-9735 T.P. T.O.S �P. - T.O.S ,__ T.P. � T.O.S � :::::: :;:::: '� � ARCHITECTS j1� ' � - l HANNOUCHE Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9 /�1/2020 6C 6G PLAN IC] 2C REAR ELEVATION 6C 6G B T.P. � T.O.S 6C 6G 6A PLAN 2C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION �t-----. � � i � --I / !/ I\' Ll □ PLAN 2C RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. □ 10 11 1Z .. .,,,. -­�"'llll'"f•--� .... � ...... -�. ... ... -. - """9'ollll'M��=-'-- 4lOWLOOJ"""""O'l!!I- =--,--:=5.�===:::=�:�;;cam'.'11� ::::=::.:::DlltOtllMa=--�=-===:.:.-----.-.�--=====::...�O;ilv�---t,;ill!Y' 9"_, ---■ SKl!W"'1UDCiitX1u:1¥l9-aaP'IWJM:N"QmlllOQIXIWO"flO!Q •�,:,r-.�-.i:,.,�a.-.-... io,:,tf/ ... rn:i■,,:l'IY.,_�.,.._Ol..._..,,_Ot�IClll.r,ow. T.P. 6E T.O.S � -T.P_:_� - ;== --,I I __ _J I 0 I __ _J T.O.S ELEVATIONS WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary ---- . -� -· ''" �· A-10736 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2 020010 DATE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 w " " ii' ► w g ii' ► 11 1 I r---.L-� ... ...L..-1 �-J.-.L--, RIDGE 1 [ ' l L_,;';_J r I -----, --T"-.,l--'--------...L. ROOF PLAN SL= 4:12 PLAN 3A 1,924 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. 45' r--------------------------7 r---, I I L ___ J ' ' ' ' ' L __ GOLF CART GARAGE I I I I. 111) IN 1.-, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L __________________________ _J FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-11737 T.P. T.O.S T.P. T.O.S T.O.S ARCHITECTS l HANNOUCHE Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 7G 7C PLAN 3A REAR ELEVATION 7C 7G 7A 7C 7G T.P. T.O.S DD PLAN 3A LEFT SIDE ELEVATION PLAN 3A RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. 10 11 ,z -- .. .. .. .. -�" .,,.. '�"" ·"'�•It--, ....... ,....� ll;IIMd"Or.ffl r-QIIOr. � ~--C!d,!al; ' ,� ..... , .. - ... ,w ,__,. .............. ""'"'"""e=-<>"'11.,.., .._ - WN>tQC.-=..""::11111�--ei=M'lllBJl\,p-� -= -:-,, .,...,_ ' ..... ---= � �°.:"" -- -��---�_..,,._..._....,../IOXl'llll:ot:t'Of'".__.., .... ::::=..�ci,:::,:°'caaa5Wffll>111:xb0oaw:!Clca:r".llll l"flll ::=�::::.:ltClt���=--===:.a-----lllf:<t�--:====::..��---.....,. O"- • �-Clt:t:u::�OleftlClllll'NCIW'Qllll!IQIIIJIQM'Q"fOU. • M:lt:I ... C-,,botClllf'OtlWll.lll'l..,.,_11:ic.Cl,_���._.,.Ol,r-a,v,•Cll�br,,..... Wood Bridge ____I.O.S T.P. T.O.S ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary -- "",_ -�"! ___ A-12738 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 ◄ "' Cl " ◄ "' ► ii: Cl " ii: " -IJ-,. r----:_-_-:i_ -'-- PLAN 3B PLAN 3C SL= 4:12 SL= 4:12 ROOF PLAN ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BE□ROOM3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GARAGE GARAGE I I L __________________________ _J L __________________________ _J PLAN 3B PLAN 3C FLOOR PLAN 1,924 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-13739 T.P. T.0.S T.P. T.O.S T.P. ARCHITECTS l HANNOUCHE Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACACOA ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 PLAN 3B REAR ELEVATION ac aG BA BG T.P. T.0.S PLAN 3B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION D PLAN 3B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION DD LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. -W,.�J .. 'flf�l1 ., _ ,,.. ii:-��� �t�•· .. . .. 10 ,., �,--••w 11 12 .. � ::.:.� --.... �•it"-.-....r.llgr"f� ... __ --·"'"':."::'3 .... �--� ..... -- -� --' --·- ·-�IJOll�-tot-,,_,,,.,...,,,../(QO'llllltllo'"�,.._ :==:..�,;:r::::..oaCCIINll!JH2'lOl�'..ac:aa'.l'l:lfflfl ===�=.:.,�--=--�.:..:::;�----•rot__,, __======--�O;ir.1--fYIV'Malllf..,..,.(W-..J -�• --.-.:.JIICIIIJ:u::trQ.OIIIM"CIIIINCIW'Qllll'iallJQIXM'Qm:nJ 0 MQll:l..,.._CO-la.C:-�a-.1111\-..ii:ic.,:J,_�..,...-=---:i--Ol..._,.., .. .,.--=--:iCllfflCl'b Wood Bridge T.P. ___!.0.S T.P. _T.0.S ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary ---- _,... _ =--�"" _M•� A-14740 T.P. T.O.S T.P. � T.O.S T.P. T.O.S ARCHITECTS l HANNOUCHE Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC,A ST_ #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 □DD 9C 9G 9A PLAN 3C REAR ELEVATION 9C 9G B T.P. T.O.S PLAN 3C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION □[ PLAN 3C RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. 10 ,, 12 -­•"IID'YilV-...,..lla,T� :-·- "" --- .�j�__.... _____ ...... ..... �_,,1pti1---=i,,._.,_...._l'Cal;l'tll;v.',i;a"" ·�- . .,.. ---r. ..... , _ ..... .,,._� -............... �";' .... �WC-.�,--- -- --,-- -' - :�=�=====��-====�---m��--- ■M-OIIDlit._ oow,t- ... �- •IIQr,�a--.)�-lptl'IQ.O;ilt,,-��-CJl"«Mll -�---O•ll!>flllo....0...C-'fvt.(' T.P. DD T.O.S ELEVATIONS WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary 0 ---- ----- -....--- A-15741 [ ROOF PLAN SL= 4:12 PLAN 4A 2,009 SF l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2 020010 DATE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. 45' r--------------------------7 I i I i I i I I I I I I I i I i I I r---, I I L ___ J COVERED OUTDOOR SPACE ii_:: 17 I I I I I I I I � ! PLAN 4 I I I L 2009 SQ. FT. 1 __________________________ _J FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-16742 10 10G ----· ... ¥1Jf111it ...... ':."':°-�-...... � ..... -.!:'"ft ---........ ---- T.P. T.0.S T.P. T.O.S T.O.S PLAN 4A REAR ELEVATION ID�I T.P. T.0.S DD PLAN 4A LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 10 10 PLAN 4A RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION DD D � �J 2 .. __ '!.'' 3 .. ··-�..:�' _, .., .. ·�.'. .. .. _ .... 10 .. J..,_,, 11 �·- 12 .. --­•-Altl'ai"llt"-.� .... Qlnv.inr, ,.._ ·--·­""'"--'"'=--.._,. ''''"" �----,--"""'' -=•·- ,-- ::CE�::?=:-e-:�=ra.r_,.m., ::=::.::::Dtlt��m::..:..ll:t::::c---cro__,111._----.a _ _. ==-====::..�O;il;,--------....... �----• SlrDwt>CuODtlluC!Y'Q,aatrorJJuCfW'VIIDJIIIQCIIM'Qm:nJ "MQl'l:l..,.-Cl'Ofll:lcit,�._.,._,,__,.d,_1'1Tl111:fft/ !!icrrlt-:--,.,..,:i1....:n,•01�bf',,._. D D � = -= ,-·- ,---� T.P. T.O.S T.P. � T.O.S ELEVATIONS l HAA��H��?5HE LA QUINTA HOMES � Qco�R, HT �------------�-=------=-=-=--------:-::----___!_��: 949.261 .2070 4 8 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#202DO,o DATE: 9 /21/2020 LA au I NT A - CA. Wood Bridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary - .-• - A-17743 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2 020010 DATE: 9 /.;_1/2020 PLAN 4B SL=4:12 ROOF PLAN ' I I I I I OPT. OFFICE BEDROOM 3 I I I I I I GARAGE ' I I I I I I I I I I I PLAN 4C SL= 4:12 GARAGE GOLF CART GARAGE ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I L __________________________ _J L __________________________ _J PLAN 4B PLAN 4C FLOOR PLAN LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-18744 T.P. T.O.S T.P. T.0.S T.P. l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R• HT 949_251 _2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 11 11 PLAN 4B REAR ELEVATION IDOi [JD -----7 T.P. T.O.S 11 PLAN 4B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 11 11 PLAN 4B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. le� "''""""'� --------· ---w.=; .. ·�" .. ··-"�' .. •".".:,_ -•"· .. ---.. .... 10 .. J..,__,._,. 11 ,.,_ 12 .. -;;_•--­•.W.tl'al1"11t"-.� .... Qlnv.in¥ ,.,.,. .. , ... --· ------·--·­""'"--'"'=--..__,. .. .... .. ,.,, . ..,,.. -,-- --... ¥1Jf111it ...... ':."':°-�-...... � ..... -.!:'"ft --. -= ,- ,--,--·- ------ ,- ... �IJOll�-Olf-,._�,../,m(l'lll;ltt ... �--::c==..��=::.���.ica.r.1111Fnr1 ::=::..::.:DC..�»,..-,,,N-i:ai:rlllrn•::::c---.-olr'Wl111._�--::.r:=.::=:::..�O;il;,--------....... �----• SlrDw.-.CUODtlluC!Y'Q.aatrorJJuCfW'VIIDJIIIQCIIM'Qm:nJ "MQl'l:l..,.-Cl'Ofll:lcit,�...,.-.,__,.d,_1'1Tl111:fft/ !!icrrlt-:--,.,..,:i1....:n,•01�bf',,._. o�,..ayrmol 11B Wood Bridge T.P. T.O.S ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-19745 T.P. T.0.S T.P. T.O.S .i T.P. I 12F .1111 12E '" � ARCHITECTS l HANNOUCHE Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 PLAN 4C REAR ELEVATION ID□ � 0,. '"" -- 7 ---LI ........ D D D T.P. T.0.S 12 12 PLAN 4C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 12 2 ' i � PLAN 4C RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION [ D LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. � ----· ... ¥1Jf111it ...... ':."':°-�-...... � ..... -.!:'"ft --~····----- �J 2 .. __ '!.'' 3 .. ··-�..:�' _,, .... ·�.'. .. .. _ .... 10 .. J..,_,, 11 �·- 12 .. --­ •.W.tl'al1"11t"-.� .... Qlnv.in¥ ,.._ ,_ ............. ""'"--'"'=--..__,. ''''"" �----,--"""'' = -= -=•·-,-·- ,--,---�::CE�::?=:-e-:�=ra.r.,.m.,::=::.::::Dtlt��m::..:..ll:t::::c---.-o__,111._---.a _ _. ==-====::..�O;il;,--------....... �----• SlrDw.-.CUODtlluC!Y'Q.aatrorJJuCfW'VIIDJIIIQCIIM'Qm:nJ "MQl'l:l..,.-Cl'Ofll:lcit,�...,.-.,__,.d,_1'1Tl111:fft/ !!icrrlt-:--,.,..,:i1....:n,•01�bf',,._. � Wood Bridge ,-�. � ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary -.-• - A-20746 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2 020010 DATE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 ► ------i-i I I I I I I I I I J _______ _J I I I ====:::i_J ROOF PLAN SL= 5:12 PLAN SA 2,131 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. I I I I COVERED I I OUTDOOR SPACE I I I I I I -,--------±1I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I =='==�===� I I I I I I I I IP-_j,._ ___ &,,. __ �I I I I I I I GOLF CART GARAGE I I L __ _ _ ____ J FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-21747 T.P. � T.O.S T.P. T.0.S T.P. T.P. T.0.S l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 ICII PLAN 5A REAR ELEVATION D 2C 2C 2G 2A B 2G 2A T.P. � T.O.S PLAN 5A LEFT SIDE ELEVATION □□DD PLAN 5A RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. loQ.t\10 lo....,_ _ __ -., "--"'-.-_,_, --· - -- ��J .. ..�, .. -- ':'..'."' .. ., .... .. 10 .. 11 ,.-..,, 1Z .. '::'."' --•,l"!cor-• .._......,. ..... r;onv.n, -- �,..,, .,.,. .... ,N ---, ..,� .:;,-::. - u,:,,Qt•c.:.,�ldl�--��-,..-a --- ,.. ' ---= ,--- ·��liOl'l--b-.�--�-IO)D._....lof"�llr#, : :=::,.a:.::,a1.:: = 1)9� 5¥r1tf»'foar.ooaW'l a.r. lg fml ::::=::.:::::Dl:at���=-:::::c---o-o-•r.�--:===i:::..��'Mf' ...... ._.,. "---• --il'C!40Cll'IOIQW'0,010P'Ol'JJuCfW"Q1111011JIQM'V...:nJI . M:lt:s.,..C--�-�.._,,-,,_,_._.,.""':ll(n'Y ��.,.,_(11....,.., .. 1:11-�III',,... Wood Bridge ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary - -­,,,,__ .,,._._ .... "" "" >c-_ T.P. T.O.S T.P. T.0.S A-22748 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 ► I I _c=========:::i_l PLAN SB SL= 5:12 --::i::;'11 -- l!!J I I --� ROOF PLAN I I I I ◄ ► I I I ====:::i_J PLAN SC SL= 5:12 I I I I I I --�ff.ff� 11 � ,..______.. .... _ .... ____ :-1 I� I I I I L ______________ J L ______________ J PLAN SB PLAN SC FLOOR PLAN LA QUINTA HOMES FLOOR PLANS 16 LA QUINTA -CA. WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-23749 T.P. []I - T.0.S T.P. T.O.S l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1/2020 PLAN 5B REAR ELEVATION 3C 3C 3G 3A 3G B PLAN 5B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION DD PLAN 5B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. ----- 10 11 1Z -- .. ... --·--- ·�· ....... •,lol!D!J'S·� ....... ,.....� -- ,·- --· •~­,.--......... l"bt-tr=--.._, �-· �--·-•·" ..... -·- ..,,.,, -- - -,41J11,[;f��li:O!�---�,..,.-ll'!t -' ,-- .�-.,.,.---�_..,,._�,.,/IO)Q ..... ._.. ..... :::=:.u::.,.::r,:.::���--CDl:r.'bfnll ::::==:�..:::'D�c,,:,,r.aD,-:t\No_:..:::::c-----• ... �--:====::...�O;iif;l""N!w''M,lll(t._,. "_ --- .... r040Clt:t:u::f't"O,Qaf"'Ol"'l!ut"lll'QIIIDIJ�'T"QU • MCl'OP9e-.bot�l,,lf\--_,.Clf,_l'l'OICIJI\' �-=--:t�Of�•w�i,,,,..,. □.....,.--� Wood Bridge ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary -­,__,, - - ,,,, T.P. T.0.S T.P. T.O.S A-24750 T.P. T.O.S T.P. T.0.S T.P. ____., - ---- - - T.P. I<- = � � .!,Y. .!,Y. = = � -,,;----=;=; "' "' "' " � T.0.S � --� l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 � � []I ' "' ,'' ,'' � '' □[ PLAN 5C REAR ELEVATION � ...._ 1C � � □I � '= I 11 � t,-,-� I\ I''& r\ ,,!::=::: l_1_AJ 1C 1G 1G PLAN 5C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION [ [ [ [ □ PLAN 5C RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION D LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. -□ = loQno ........ ----,__ "'-. -----·--- "'= .. ·�" �-.. M - ';'_ ..... ., 10 .. l'•l»:> 11 �-�"°:" 12 .. � --- ... �.��llgr't� --.. ,.,, ·- .---....-..... ·-- -- ' . r,n,O,iiot. � -· --,_,_,_ .. ...... ..,._.,l&c:<I_ .... � -,�, . ' �--Ir'-'� :iaor.. -4q.e4�'::.:=""""--� ...... --- ===--=:::=:-c-:�=!ml' . .-.� ::=::.;:::etat�=--�=--===�----•.,.-.-ro-Q--:=.=:==::...��MV'""--'____,. 9'--- 1 ..... f"<uUC.1:U:ftP'O,CICP'Dl'JJUCIW'QD!QIOIQM'G"fOU • ���bC.-.��---.toc.d,_1'■'1:1■■:1'1\' .,_---,�,:111.....,.., .. IM�� ...... � ELEVATIONS WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary . -------- ·------ ""--""" ,,_ .. _ T.P. T.O.S T.P. - T.� A-25751 w ◄� ► I i_c=========:::i- ROOF PLAN SL= 5:12 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 I I w I ◄ � I a: I I I L[_-_ -_u PLAN 6A 2,260 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. I I L_ __________ ...J..j -7--------...u I 1io : ,� =J =======-=R I FLOOR PLAN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GOLF CART GARAGE I I __J FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-26752 T.P. T.0.$ T.P. !,0.$ T.O.S l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 5C 5G [] 5A PLAN 6A REAR ELEVATION 5C B 5G T.P. _T.0. PLAN 6A LEFT SIDE ELEVATION PLAN 6A RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. --� --· ._.,_ --I-�, -._,..,.....,-:..., � �� 111:'!nf, �"""" Cm'CII'.,: --� .... .,. ,.. __ ._. ___ _ CCllol!"'"'•,...--.., .. ,.,,.,,.,, -"""" 10 11 12 .,_.,_ .. -"-� .. , ...,.., .. '""' , .... .. ,,., . .. ,� .. ,,,_,.��...-,.c� �,..�,., .. 11::ir;o,�:i.-,--.,...•��·- �-, ...... :==...��==�2(ID�·-Cctta'.Ju0om ::=::.:,;-c.ll<lf'Mdlll ..-.:k'\._.=�=::=�-CWO"llW!alP>&QIQl'O'Q'llid;ialO"=�===:����� .. ----­•----09�0"-v.Jt/POID'OIIDCOPJW"Q.,._ • �l:!ffl;""'!l)tll��-""�('Nl,....,....!l,:,,-'llll...:-,lJlllll(ll(fm:.,,,,,,.,lllll(lt�.,...� Wood Bridge ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 ' ,- w~--- . -----,.,, ,,,. -- T.P. _T.0.S T.P. ____!.0.S_ Preliminary A-27753 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 ◄ ◄ w " 0 1i' w " 0 � �0- ► I I I I I I I I I I I I I ....._ I I I I I I I I 1,--------_J.� I I I I I .... L __ J r---, I I I I I I -# 'r---,J __ L_ __ _ c--------:::i_J I I I I PLAN 6B SL= 5:12 : ◄ � �: I "' I I I I I Lr.:....-_-_J_J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROOF PLAN I I I I PLAN 6C SL= 5:12 GARAGE 2'!->:XW-1' I I I I L ______________ J L ______________ J PLAN 6B PLAN 6C FLOOR PLAN LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-28754 T.P. T.0.S 6C 6G □[ BA IDI PLAN 6B REAR ELEVATION 6C 6G B T.P. T.0. loQ.jita '°""""­--- 10 11 12 --.. "" '"" .. ... �.��llgr'f� ---­,.,_ .,,.._., .. ,llltlt�.,_�,-l'(®-.;tii,,,,,rl,;;llillf'llll•- --- '1179tQ[;t�"::'3-�-....-.v ��----,--- _ ..... :�a:.::,ar::,:,::::::,.21m11iDa(,,oooi.a(m:r'.ltllF.-i ::::==::.;::::e�-ID«-f!Now::..::::�--lr0-111 ... NQl"U"Ql«lca. :====::...�CGlb'"�"-'-'.,_,.g_ T.P. r1==��= ��=====J== T.O.S T.P. l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1/2020 PLAN 6B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION □□DD PLAN 6B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. 6B ELEVATIONS WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary -­,__,, -- ,,, ---- T.P. T.O.S ____J.P. T.0.S A-29755 T.P. T.0.S □ T.P. I,O.S T.0.S_ ' ' l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1/2020 4C 4G []I PLAN 6C REAR ELEVATION 4C 4G T.P. T.0. PLAN 6C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION PLAN 6C RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. l,QQ..0>1Q LoQJnlro.� --"""' '--""" ..... 10 11 " .._ ---... .. .. "" . --· ....,,_ �iud -�·-- "'.�' -•m ,w, ---­•.IIIQ!t'III.._._.,....,� �-_ _,.� ,_, ......... _�-· �1!W ,..-,,,, --~ ""'' -·-,. w ... . M:11 Cll"o:;I� :$l:lrlll -. ...... O,W_,_,""-U,,. .. \M;;­c...::.1:1111 .... CDW\llbt __ _ :==i.===�:�·=c-,_'-::===:::::::.:·---•l"'«fl--=�==..::::.=.o-aglg'W'O.....,.llllh9uv.ra,;ll..allllJV'====:::..�caro-'fUV�l,o,o,t"----• 11o,-.,,_,_�C0-0Cftr'9""°'1D""°""9- • ll,l;;l'll;;lrp--.�IQW�.,_._,..._io,;.IQlr.,._....$;,n,ll,.._,_.;i-c,1,,_..,.,.c,.,�1111'...:,IQr Wood Bridge ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 . ----- T.P. T.P. _____I.O.S_ Preliminary A-30756 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 rT ______________ T1 I I I I I I I I I I ....._ � 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ��------------�� I I I I �------ll I � ► ◄J I 1 I 1 u L ___ ___ _J ROOF PLAN SL= 4:12 PLAN 7A 2,277 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. ,------®'-------7 I I i i I I L __ �--============� I I I I I I COVSRSO I I I I OUTDOOR SPACE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LIVING ROOM 11113 DINING I I _ ______ J FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-31757 I-P. T.O.S T.P. T.0.S T.P. � T.O.S ARCHITECTS Qco�R• HT 949.261 .2070 □DD 8A PLAN 7A REAR ELEVATION BC 8G l HANNOUCHE � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 DD __J.P. T.O.S PLAN 7A LEFT SIDE ELEVATION [I] PLAN 7A RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. -----.. .. .. .. 10 .. 11 12 .. --· ---w.=; ·�" ··-"�' •".".:... -•"· ...... J..,__,._,. ,.,_ ·;;_•--­•.W.tl'al1"11t"-.� .... Qlnv.in¥ ,.,.,. .. , ... --· -........ ·--·­""'"--'"'=--..__,. �----,--..,,.. ... �IJOll�-Olf-,._�,../,m(l'lll;ltt ... �-- --... ¥1Jf111it ...... ':."':°-�-...... � ..... -.!:'"ft --. -= ,- ,--,--·-::c==..��=::.���.ica.r.1111Fnr1 ::=::..::.:DC..�»,..-,,,N-i:ai:rlllrn•::::c---.-olr'Wl111._�--::.r:=.::=:::..�O;il;,--------....... �----• SlrDw.-.CUODtlluC!Y'Q.aatrorJJuCfW'VIIDJIIIQCIIM'Qm:nJ "MQl'l:l..,.-Cl'Ofll:lcit,�...,.-.,__,.d,_1'1Tl111:fft/ !!icrrlt-:--,.,..,:i1....:n,•01�bf',,._. o�,..ayrmol 8B D D ------ ' _.,,._ ,- T.P. T.0.S __J.P. � T.O.S ELEVATIONS WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-32758 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 ◄ L.[==== PLAN 7B SL= 4:12 GOLF CART GARAGE I I I I ◄ PLAN 7C SL= 4:12 ROOF PLAN GOLF CART GARAGE I I I I L ______________ J L ______________ J PL��l8,s PLAN 7C FLOOR PLAN LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-33759 I.P. D II II � II II II II II II II I,0.S_ T.P. T.O.S T.P. 98 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R• HT 949_251 _2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 D D D 9A PLAN 7B REAR ELEVATION D 9A _J.P. _J.O.� PLAN 7B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 9G PLAN 7B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. le� "''""""'� --------· --- w.=; .. ·�" .. ··-"�' .. •".".:,_ -•"· .. ---.. .... 10 .. J..,__,.,,. 11 ,.,_ 12 .. -;;_•--­ •.W.D'al1'11t"-.� .... Qlnv.in¥ ,.,.,. .. , ... --· ------·--·­'"""--'"'=--....,,. .. .... .. ,.,, . ..,,.. -,-- --... ¥1Jf111it ...... ':."':°-�-'"(WljJ � ..... -.!:'"ft --. -= ,- ,--,--·- ------ ,- ... �IJOll�-Olf-,._�,../,m(l'lll;ltt ... �--::c==..��=::.���.i ca.r.1111Fnr1 ::=::.::.:DC..�»,..-,,,N-i:ai:rlllrn•::::c----cro-.,111 .. �-- ::.r:=.::=:::..�O;il;,- -------....... �----• SlrDwt>CuODtlluC!Y'Q,aatrorJJuCfW'VIIDJIIIQCIIM'Qm:nJ "MQl'l:l..,.-Cl'Ofll:lcit,�._.,._,,__,.d,_1'1Tl111:fft/ !!icrrlt-:--,.,..,:i1....:n,•01�bf',,... o�,...ayrmol D Wood Bridge T.P. T.O.S _J.P. _J.O.S ELEVATIONS Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-34760 T.P. D D II II � II II II II II II II r.o.s_ T.P. T.O.S T.P. l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R• HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 D PLAN 7C REAR ELEVATION D 7A 7C 7G D T.P. � _J.0.1?_ 7A PLAN 7C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION PLAN 7C RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. -----.. .. .. .. 10 .. 11 12 .. --· ---w.=; ·�" ··-"�' •".".:... -•"· ...... J..,__,._,. ,.,_ ·;;_•--­•.W.tl'al1"11t"-.� .... Qlnv.in¥ ,.,.,. .. , ... --· -........ ·--·­""'"--'"'=--..__,. .. .... .. ,.,, �----,--..,,.. ... �IJOll�-Olf-,._�,../,m(l'lll;ltt ... �-- --... ¥1Jf111it ...... ':."':°-�-...... � ..... -.!:'"ft --. -= ,- ,--,----::c==..��=::.���.i ca.r.1111Fnr1 ::=::..::.:DC..�»,..-,,,N-i:ai:rlllrn•::::c---.-olr'Wl111._�--::.r:=.::=:::..�O;il;,--------....... �----• SlrDw.-.CUODtlluC!Y'Q.aatrorJJuCfW'VIIDJIIIQCIIM'Qm:nJ "MQl'l:l..,.-Cl'Ofll:lcit,�...,.-.,__,.d,_1'1Tl111:fft/ !!icrrlt-:--,.,..,:i1....:n,•01�bf',,._. o�,..ayrmol □DD ------ ' _.,,._ ,- T.P. T.O.S _J.P. _J.O.S ELEVATIONS WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-35761 ◄ � ► I I I I RIDGE I I I I I I I I I RIDGE ► ◄ g �:L _r_-_-_-_-__ -_-_-_-_7._ _J I "' I I I I I Le_-__ -_]_, ROOF PLAN ARCHITECTS -Qc;;';.'.:,'.'°.;'," :,";'•-c, 949.261 .2070 SL= 4:12 l HANNOUCHE 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 u BEDROOM 3 ,,,,.x,�-0· ■ XI/\A� LOFT O�-<l'X11'-o" - - 2ND FLOOR PLAN PLAN 8A 2,530 SF - LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. 1 ______ 50' ------7 L_ r--, I I L_J MASTER BEDROOM ==============A COVERED OUTDOOR F=n LfEl4J KITCHEN I __ J 1 ST FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAMBLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949·348·8162 Preliminary A-36762 T.P. F.F. T.P. T.O.S T.P. F.F. T.P. T.O.S 11B l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 11 11 11G B PLAN BA LEFT SIDE ELEVATION B D PLAN BA RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 11 11 11G � LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. [ D � T.P. F.F. T.P. � T.O.S T.P. ; F.F. T.P. 0 T.O.S .. "" _,, .. "" "" 10 .. 11 1Z .. -­o,l,ID!Jll1"1,.._�l'lllrf� ll;JIMO� i:.n.coio,. ,edf,r ---- 0.-,_...._. ... ....., """'""'""'-=-.._,. - '-'l:N"fq[4���-'IO"ili ttM'tfll!;.!,..._z,oe :=:Lc':i�E::r�:�;;tmr .. � :::=::'.;:::Dr..�D�na:::!.::::;;:�----•��--:=.::=:::...�J;w-"flai'.,,.,.,IQlll"fO"- mPO!Ol1._ ..... .Mt.:. •�f"<uDC'ltU..::ll'Q.a�JJuarQID!!OIIDQDIM'Ol'l'iCffll • M:il'OI0'9CO-a,,i:.,�a,.-,.-.._,_.,fl._��-=--cl_.,.Ol....,.,,.,.._,.....,IJJ...., ELEVATIONS -­,,,,,__ -� - "" �---�- WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-37763 . T.P. u � ,;, .!!J:.F. 'LE--- T.0.S l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC,A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DA TE: 9 /.;_1 /2020 I u u u u � - - - [ 110 11 11 u u u � u u - - - - - �� PLAN 8A REAR ELEVATION 1 � LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. T.P. ,;, _f.F._ T P. - � T.0.S --------· . ---c:---__ ,·----­�--,..,.,, ..... ��ia'la!•....C­COW\DB.,...,,_O'l!I ,_ 10 11 12 �Hi:illll: -•·�· :rlll"¥!11 _..,, •,l,llla'f • ._...,.._...,� •llil....,,,..IIQ,-,4lpti.lPl;ll'-.;l.,._�$'R:r(QCl,il;,i;s�fwi,,il----- M ,u :::::=..a:.=..�:::.:.=..21Ql11De11,oooo._Com'. Alllf-, ::::::::::::::::..,-----.. ��=::::::::-o-l.lllQ:-...,111nt......v'dl"Q1MICIJID =====::..�Oul,;,'Mf'�..,,.....<;._ ----• ...,._ll'iOUaC.1CudW'$0 ... 1DuefrOPVIOIIIIIM'9-• �,:;,nll,.-.ta,ti.� ...... --.v;.c1 ... l""IJlll7Wr s,,;,...,�-v11-•ita1-�twm(,,lur □..:.,,.--..,.,.. ELEVATIONS Wood Bridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary . ---- ---- -- ,, __ A-38764 r-------- w (!) " ii: I I I I I ◄E � E► !I I I I u-_-__ -_7....J ROOF PLAN SL= 5:12 & 4:12 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS -Qc;;';.'.:,'.'°.;'," :,";'•-c, 949.261 .2070 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 BEDROOM 3 __ J LOFT 2ND FLOOR PLAN PLAN 8B 2,530 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. 1 ______ 50' ------7 r--, I I L_J MASTER BEDROOM I 1io C') L ______________ J 1 ST FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949·348·8162 Preliminary A-39765 T.P. F.F. T.P. T.O.S T.P. F.F. l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACACOA ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 12 12 PLAN 8B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION PLAN 8B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION [ LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. T.P. T.P. F.F. T� T.O.S loQuroo lo....,__ ---....._ "'-... ----· - --- -:.::' .. "" .,_ �_::::• _, .. , .. 10 .. l/lt,-....., 11 1Z .. ---a,ljl�·� ....... ,....� -- �,.,, ,.,_ �-= ,.,_ -�t•- .�,'.."::. --· •·-- --. - a,ljl�IO,III-O.OIS'"9d,.___,,,.,_,'020_,,_.l«.I�,._, ... -t•Ciot�":'1=-----­ CO!ill'L!le:I._.,._� = ·= ,-·- ,--.':!'""' : :=:..a::.,::i.:=::c:.=:.111»�.acca:r.1111FM1 ===�.=:'DC..�D,,,_,,l'lla:::,::::::::::a---__,• ... �--:====::...�r;w,-�,._._.,_..C,IJOR --- • !iJD"olf'C!40Clt:t:u::IY"$ClaP'IWJJu:N"QIIIIDlll�"l!O"U • M:ll'O��botC0"'1Jlfllt,o....-. ...... -.c,,,.lffl//CffY��.:.Cf......,,,.ot ____ br,,._. ELEVATIONS Wood Bridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 ---- - ,,,, '"".-- Preliminary A-40766 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R• HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 � T.P. F.F. T.P. r.o.s_ [ PLAN 8B REAR ELEVATION B LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. T.P. m F.F. T.P. � _].0.� LoQkuc IO'"-""Cdoo<OI --c,_, -""-. ' ------·a;MUa:-... _r .... � ....... '11'"9� "°"' ...--,,.. ...... ,..,... .... �";":;:-........ ,.,.,.,,,,. co..ura.--- "!_"'" �1!1J1 .. ,�11 ..... ..,, .. �-"' ---.,.,, ":'"��I .... .. .. _.,., .. ~ .. �-· ----,-�,,., .,,,, 10 .., �-... II ::·- 12 .. � ---·--.... _..�.._.,.-a,,-,� .... �i.:i,,,1p,-�--. ....... ,.�-.:-�IQ;1iftll,..,. :==.a:.:.a1::::.mlOINO!JN:.wl11loalloooa'-,OD,la'Alllr.., :::::::::=:.;:;'O�--�m::..::.::�-OQIO:lnt ..... 111 ... �--:=.::=:=--�0;,lv ..... .,,_,_,..,.....O'_ ----• _,.,..-O.OOW1WC"'9,Cll-�D'iolllCJDD\,lr'Q-• �ic--.-11:1t'llf��-... ���"""°"' �---,.:-0,.,,,,,,,,,,., .. 11:11.......,tsr,,.... ELEVATIONS Wood Bridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary 0 ----- -----""""' - A-41767 r-------- w "" " I I I I I ◄; I :;►!I I I I LL-__ -_]_, I I I I I I I I I L _r_-_-_-_-__ -_-_-_-_L _J ROOF PLAN ARCHITECTS -Qc;;';.'.:,'.'°.;'," :,";'•-c, 949.261 .2070 20250 SW ACACIA ST. #145 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 SL= 5:12 & 4:12 l HANNOUCHE PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 BEDROOM 3 LOFT 2ND FLOOR PLAN PLAN 8C 2,530 SF LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA -CA. 1 ______ 50' ------7 r-7 �-J �4J --==MA=ST-ER..... I GOLF CART GARAGE � I 1io (') L ______________ J 1 ST FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS I 16 WoodBridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949·348·8162 Preliminary A-42768 ,;, T.P. F.F. T.P. T.O.S _i..E.,..E_,_ � $> �.O.S 10E ,- ,= � � �I l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 i B PLAN 8C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION '-, B DD PLAN 8C RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. I T.P. m -T.J:'.,_ ,;, F.£,_ T� _______J T.0.S ... .. _,, .... .. 10 .. 11 1Z .. -­•""Dll"'f•-lt.--.�l'lllrf� lllall!N"-"' fJmoCOiol. � ----� ,_...._. ... ......, """'""'""'"'-=" ..... ..,,,. --· - '-'l:N"fq[4���-'IO"ili ttM'tfll!;.!,..._z,oe •1¥--.V, ... IIOtif--..0"-�ll/f,WO�fol"....,....,,_. :=..�ac:,.cr:;:::�2!m�WICOll:r . ._� :::=:'.::::Dr..�Dl'IW:llnO:::!.C:::::;�----•��--:====::...�O;illi;r�.,,...,"'1MfO"----• 5-tr.:dDC'ltU..::ll'Q.a�JJuC�D!O!IDaDIM'Ql'l'iCfflll • MCll:ll,:.,nll-Cllla,,i:.,�a,.-,.-_,,11:otct .. ��-=--.l_.,.Ol....,.,,. ......... IJJ ...... ELEVATIONS -� Wood Bridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary A-43769 l HANNOUCHE ARCHITECTS Qco�R, HT 949.261 .2070 � 20250 SW ACAC0A ST. #,45 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 PROJECT#2020010 DATE: 9/21/2020 T.P. _E.F. I-P. I-0.S_ PLAN 8C REAR ELEVATION LA QUINTA HOMES LA QUINTA - CA. B T.P. _f.F. _J.P. ,;, _].0.� -""---­....... °"' 10 11 12 --.. ------ _,_ .... �-��.....,� ... ,.,, ,._ --· -----,_....--._ ..,._,,,,o,r-...,....,.., ...... -"''"'"' ,.,.., .... -,,,q,�•ll>,..�!r-.._...,.1'(®'9ai;:1._.l,;ilillf'IIII,.... --' ... _,. - -41Jlit��:::"--��-- ::::..- :==.a:=.<,1::.::.i:.:::::.�11oa(,,ooo•..:1Ckm'.All r.wt ::==::.:::Dllli_,_lf>�No�:..===�----111 ..... �IIMl- •lv'<�,O,-,�O.ll>ClltQ.Oi;iltr-��(ll"-...JI •���•Dmf'tOM..�� ELEVATIONS Wood Bridge Pacific Group, LLC 27271 LAS RAM BLAS, STE #100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 949-348-8162 Preliminary -­.___- -- , ... __ - A-44 770 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING DEPARTMENT REPORT TO: Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director DATE: December 15, 2020 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON PREPARATION OF THE 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE OCTOBER 2021-OCTOBER 2029 PLANNING PERIOD The Housing Element of the General Plan is one of the required Elements, and the only one which must be updated on a fixed, State-mandated schedule. The planning period under which the City is currently operating will end in October 2021. The next 8-year planning period will be from October 2021 to October 2029. The City is responsible for facilitating the development of all types of housing for all income levels. Market rate units are affordable to above-moderate income households, and will be constructed primarily based on market demand. Units affordable to very low, low and moderate income households, however, generally require subsidy in order to remain affordable. The City has been proactive in developing affordable housing units in the current, 2014-2021 planning period. Both the Washington Street Apartments and the Coral Mountain Apartments were developed. 2014–2021 Regional Housing Needs Assessment Household Income Levels Income as a Percent of County Median RHNA Allocation Units Constructed Very Low Less than 50% 91 60 Low 51%–80% 61 136 Moderate 81%–120% 66 47 Above- Moderate Over 120% 146 690+ Total 1 364 933+ DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 5 771 For the upcoming 2022-2029 planning period, the State’s concern regarding the lack of housing for Californians State-wide is reflected in the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA): 2022-2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment Household Income Levels Income as a Percent of County Median RHNA Allocation Very Low Less than 50% 419 Low 51%–80% 268 Moderate 81%–120% 296 Above-Moderate Over 120% 543 Total 1,526 In order to facilitate the increased RHNA, the City will continue to seek out and partner with affordable housing development companies. Projects will be identified and pursued during the upcoming planning period. As part of the Housing Element preparation, staff is conducting outreach and community workshops to provide education and receive input. Staff presented this material to the Planning Commission and will present to the Housing Commission on January 6, 2021. Staff is also conducting an online workshop for housing developers, providers and agencies as well as the public on January 13, 2021. Any feedback collected at these meetings will be considered in preparing the Housing Element. The Housing Element must be reviewed and “certified” by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The City will be completing the draft Housing Element, which is expected to maintain the current policy direction, because of the success the City has seen, and will submit the Housing Element to the State in early 2021. Staff anticipates that the Housing Element will come before the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration in the late summer of 2021. 772 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 OCTOBER 27, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2020 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 5:05 p.m. by Chairperson Proctor. This meeting was held by teleconference pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N- 29-20, N-33-20, and N-35-20, executed by the Governor of California in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Commissioners Bettenceourt, Caldwell, Currie, Libolt Varner, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor ABSENT: Commissioner McCune STAFF PRESENT: Design & Development Director Danny Castro, Planning Manager Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner Carlos Flores, Commission Secretary Sijifredo Fernandez PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Nieto led the Planning Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA There were no requests to speak under the ‘Public Comment on Matters Not on the Agenda’ section of the meeting and Staff continued to monitor emails should written comments or requests for verbal comments be received. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA – CONFIRMED ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION- NONE CONSENT CALENDAR REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 27 773 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 OCTOBER 27, 2020 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DATED JUNE 23, 2020 MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Caldwell/Libolt Varner to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted. AYES: Commissioners Bettencourt, Caldwell, Currie, Libolt Varner, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner McCune. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed unanimously. Chairperson Proctor announced the withdrawal of public hearing item number 2. The item was publicly noticed but the applicant decided to withdraw the item prior to this public hearing. DECLARATIONS REGARDING COMMISSION PUBLIC CONTACTS – No public contact to report. BUSINESS SESSION- NONE STUDY SESSION- NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMISSIONER MCCUNE ARRIVED TO THE MEETING AT 5:12 P.M. 1. ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020-0003 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY WITHIN THE HIDEAWAY GOLF CLUB AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. LOCATION: 80440 HIDEAWAY CLUB COURT (WITHIN HIDEAWAY GOLF CLUB) Senior Planner Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Staff responded to Commission inquiries and comments regarding: • The applicant providing staff with a direct contact for the project. • The co-location requirements and provisions for future carriers. • Adding a condition of approval to remove the brick accent wrapping the bottom of the tower element. • Adding a condition relocating the cable tray to a location not visible to public view. • The project, despite being located on private property, would still be part of staff’s annual compliance review. 774 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 OCTOBER 27, 2020 PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mr. Victor Flores, J5 Infrastructure Partners- noted that they would relocate the cable tray as requested and remove the brick veneer at the bottom of the tower element. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Bettencourt/Currie to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2020-008 approving Conditional Use Permit 2020-0003 and determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval and with the addition of the following Conditions of Approval: • The cable tray equipment shall be moved out of view from the public by moving it further west, behind the cupola. This shall be reflected on final building plans and confirmed during inspection(s). • The base of the cupola shall be smooth stucco all the way to its base. No additional materials are approved to be installed on the base of the cupola. 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020-0002 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MONOPALM WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY WITHIN THE MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTRY CLUB AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. LOCATION: 80345 POMELO (WITHIN MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTRY CLUB)— WITHDRAWN REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS UPDATE Planning Manager Flores presented a verbal report on upcoming projects. Staff responded to Commission inquiries and comments regarding: • Information on the Wave project and the next steps of the CEQA process. • Potential RHNA impacts by reducing the numbers of housing units for the Travertine project. • Clarification on what will be reviewed in the following Planning Commission meeting for the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project. The meeting will only be addressing the height of the buildings located within the image corridor and not the project as a whole. • The status of the Desert Club Apartments project and the undergrounding waiver issued by Council. COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS – NONE STAFF ITEMS 775 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 OCTOBER 27, 2020 Director Castro gave a short update on the work of the Short-term Vacation Rental Committee. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners McCune/Bettencourt to adjourn at 5:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, SIJIFREDO FERNANDEZ, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California 776 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 1 NOVEMBER 4, 2020 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 CALL TO ORDER A regular quarterly meeting of the Financial Advisory Commission (Commission) was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chairperson Mills. This meeting was held by teleconference pursuant to Executive orders N-25- 20, N-29-20, N-33-20, and N-35-20, executed by the Governor of California in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Commissioners Batavick, Hoffner, Hunter, Rosen, Twohey, Way and Chairperson Mills ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Management Assistant Delgado, Financial Services Analyst Hallick, Finance Director Romero, Community Resources Director Escobedo, Public Safety Manager Mendez, Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney, and Management Analyst Mignogna PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Hoffner led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Chairperson Mills requested a discussion under Commissioners’ Items on timing of Commission meetings with coordination of presentations to Council. The Commission concurred. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 28 777 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 2 NOVEMBER 4, 2020 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. WELCOME NEW FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSIONER ELLEN WAY The Commission welcomed Commissioner Way, who provided an overview of her experience and qualifications; and all Commissioners shared a brief introduction of their backgrounds and experiences on the Commission. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1. APPROVE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 2. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED JUNE 30, 2020 3. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED JULY 31, 2020 4. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED AUGUST 31, 2020 Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Rosen/Hoffner to approve the Consent Calendar, as submitted: x Consent Calendar Item No. 1 – Motion passed: ayes 6, noes 0, abstain 1 (Way); x Consent Calendar Item Nos. 2, 3, and 4 – Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION 1. RECEIVE AND FILE THE FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 GENERAL FUND YEAR-END BUDGET REPORT Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. The Commission and staff discussed capital improvement program (CIP) expenditures; fiscal year 2020/21 CIP/operating expenditure carryovers; General Fund revenue and expense variances; revenue line item details on the 2019/20 year-end budget report; funds savings allocation; and the City’s pension trust fund obligations. 778 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 3 NOVEMBER 4, 2020 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING Finance Director Romero said that a special meeting in December is suggested to review the City’s long-term projections and noted the City will hold its annual Community Workshop virtually in line with health and safety directives and to ensure everyone’s safety. Commissioner Hoffner commended staff for their efforts and hard work given the circumstances in completing the year-end budget report. Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Twohey/Hoffner to receive and file the Fiscal Year 2019/20 General Fund Year-End Budget Report. Motion passed unanimously 2. RECEIVE AND FILE THE FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 MEASURE G SALES TAX COMPLIANCE REPORT (Report) Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Finance Director Romero thanked Commissioners Batavick and Rosen for their participation, time, and contribution on the subcommittee in formulating the Report. Commissioner Batavick shared his experience with the process of formulating the Report and said it was a great collaboration with Commissioner Rosen and staff given the circumstances of the pandemic. Chairperson Mills commended Commissioners Batavick and Rosen and staff on their efforts in drafting the Report. Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Hunter/Twohey to receive and file the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Compliance Report. Motion passed unanimously 3. RECOMMEND APPROPRIATION OF ADDITIONAL MEASURE G FUNDING FOR THE SILVERROCK PARK VENUE PROJECT NO. 2016-08 AND ALONGI BUILDING PROJECT AND DISCUSS PROPOSED PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SILVERROCK PARK VENUE PROJECT (Project) Finance Director Romero, Management Analyst Mignogna, Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney, and City Consultant Chris Hermann, President/CEO of Hermann Design Group, presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. 779 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 4 NOVEMBER 4, 2020 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING The Commission and staff discussed proposed phase II improvements for the Project, including high priority items and other upgrades, additional landscape recommendations, necessary drainage improvements, retention basin stabilization and additional costs associated with the venue site and Alongi building; and additional funding sources apart from Measure G funds that may be available, and the timeline for Council presentation of phase I and phase II recommendations. Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Way/Batavick to recommend Council approval of additional Measure G funding appropriation, in the amount of $244,700, for the SilverRock Park Venue Project No. 2016-08 and $160,000 for the Alongi Building Project. Motion passed unanimously. The Commission recommended forming an ad-hoc committee to review the recommended phase II improvements for the Project. Commissioners’ Mills, Rosen, and Way expressed their willingness to serve on the ad-hoc committee. The Commission Concurred. 4. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 FIRST QUARTER BUDGET REPORT Financial Services Analyst Hallick presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. No changes were recommended in the Fiscal Year 2020/21 First Quarter Budget Report, which was focused on current economic conditions and continuously monitoring the adopted budget. Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Rosen/Hoffner to receive and file fiscal year 2020/21 first quarter budget report. Motion passed unanimously. 5. DISCUSS AND APPROVE THE POLICE SERVICES REVIEW COMMITTEE (Committee) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICE SERVICES Financial Services Analyst Hallick, Community Resources Director Escobedo, and Public Safety Manager Mendez presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Commissioner Batavick and Rosen shared their experience from serving on the Committee. 780 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 5 NOVEMBER 4, 2020 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING The Commission and staff discussed the Committee’s preliminary recommendations, included as Attachment 1 to the staff report; the Commission made recommendations for minor changes to the attachment before being presented to Council, which included the removal of language associated with tax increases Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Twohey/Hunter to approve the police services committee recommendations for police services, as amended per the Commission’s recommendations. Motion passed unanimously STUDY SESSION – None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. FINANCE DEPARTMENT CURRENT AND FUTURE INITIATIVES Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Staff recommended having a Commission special meeting on Wednesday, December 2 due to the volume of special projects and the timing of presentations given to the Council. The Commission concurred. 2. SECOND QUARTER 2020 (APRIL-JUNE) SALES TAX UPDATE FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA Financial Services Analyst Hallick presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. 3. LA QUINTA COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS EMERGENCY ECONOMIC RELIEF PROGRAM (Program) – verbal update Financial Services Analyst Hallick said Council approved to amend the program to allow businesses affected by state orders to apply for relief of August rent and utilities at a regular meeting on October 20th. The Commission commended the City on continuing to help businesses with the program. 781 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 6 NOVEMBER 4, 2020 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS Chairman Mills asked if staff could bring forth items to be presented to Council sooner to allow more time for review by the Commission even if a special meeting is needed. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Hoffner/Rosen to adjourn this meeting at 7:35 p.m. Motion passed unanimously Respectfully submitted, Jessica Delgado, Management Assistant City of La Quinta, California Digitally signed by Jessica Delgado DN: cn=Jessica Delgado, o=City of La Quinta, ou=Finance Department, email=jdelgado@laquintaca.gov, c=US Date: 2020.12.02 18:09:47 -08'00' 782 STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE Page 1 of 5 NOVEMBER 5, 2020 MEETING MINUTES SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2020 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Short-Term Vacation Rental Program Ad-Hoc Committee (Committee) was called to order at 4:01 p.m. by Committee Secretary Lorett. This meeting was held by teleconference pursuant to Executive Orders N-25- 20, N-29-20, N-33-20, and N-35-20, executed by the Governor of California in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). ROLL CALL PRESENT: Committee Members Best, Butler, Caldwell, Church, Coronel, Franco, Grotsky, Jonasson, McDonough, Monroe, Shelton, Spinney, Tamm and Chair Schutz ABSENT: Committee Member Navarro STAFF PRESENT: Design & Development Director Castro, Hub Manager Sanchez, Permit Technician/Committee Secretary Lorett, Public Safety Manager Mendez, Code Compliance Supervisor Meredith, and Community Resources Director Escobedo PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Committee Secretary Lorett led the Committee in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA Committee Secretary Lorett announced the following WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS were received as of 12:00 p.m., which were distributed to the Committee, and incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting: REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 29 783 STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE Page 2 of 5 NOVEMBER 5, 2020 MEETING MINUTES •Sandy and Tom Baak – commenting on the Short-Term Vacation Rental (STVR) hotline; •Greg Schierholz – requesting an extension of Executive Order No. 10 imposing a moratorium on new STVR permits and recommending tiered permit fees; •Charles Eckman – recommending stronger restrictions on STVRs, and requesting enforcement assistance from the City for STVRs located within residential communities with homeowner associations (HOAs); •Keith Benham – requesting the termination of Executive Order No. 9 imposing stricter regulations on the use and occupation of STVRs; •Anthony Amini and Richard LaBrie – providing suggestions to the Committee to consider when making recommendations related to STVRs for Council’s consideration; •Carrie Babij – recommending how to improve the STVR program and requesting the termination of Executive Order No. 10; •Meagan Beavers, Arlene Gotshalk, and Jeffrey Smith – in opposition of STVRs; •Nelda Esmeralda – requesting new applications be accepted for homeshare STVRs during the moratorium imposed by Executive Order No. 10; •Barbara (Barb) Montavon – commenting on over occupancy for STVRs and monitoring advertisements for unlicensed properties; •James Lewis – recommending improvements for the STVR program; •David Dinnel – in support of STVRs and providing information on volunteer services to assist the City in collecting data. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Chair Schutz requested to switch the agenda order by taking up the Business Session items first, followed by Study Session. The Committee concurred. CONSENT CALENDAR 1.APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 1, 2020 MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Committee Members Best/Caldwell to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted. Motion passed: ayes 14, noes 0, absent 1 (Navarro). REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1.CODE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Community Resources Director Escobedo provided an update on Code 784 STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE Page 3 of 5 NOVEMBER 5, 2020 MEETING MINUTES Enforcement activities: • Staff is drafting a report to present to the City Council at the November 17, 2020, regular meeting outlining the STVR program’s characteristics; the City’s past, current, and future objectives and initiatives; and enforcement efforts; • City Council approved one additional Code Compliance Officer position on October 20, 2020; • A weekly posting of active and suspended STVR properties is available on the City website; • Staff is preparing to send out Cease and Desist letters to all unlicensed properties. Director Escobedo answered related questions from Committee Members. BUSINESS SESSION – items taken out of agenda order 1. APPROVE PERMITTING SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS TO MODIFY SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PERMIT PROCESS AND REQUIREMENTS Committee Member Jonasson provided an overview of the proposed recommendations to modify the current STVR permit process and requirements: • Two types of permits – Homeshare and standard STVR; • Minimum stay requirements; • Neighbor notification of a new permit or permit renewal; • Review of costs for STVR program to ensure all costs are fully covered by permit/license fees; • Permits shall be non-transferrable; • Enhance City databases to improve enforcement and reporting of the STVR program; • Suspended STVR property addresses to be published on the City website; • Properties to be suspended for 6 months for operating without a permit and denied a permit if this type of violation re-occurs. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Committee Members Monroe/Shelton to approve the permitting sub-committee report with recommendations to modify short-term vacation rental permit process and requirements. Motion passed: ayes 12, noes 2, absent 1 (Navarro). 2. APPROVE DENSITY SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT WITH 785 STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE Page 4 of 5 NOVEMBER 5, 2020 MEETING MINUTES RECOMMENDATIONS TO MODIFY SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL OCCUPANCY LIMITS Committee Member Best noted the Committee considered this item at the October 1, 2020, meeting; and provided an overview of the proposed recommendations, which were amended based on the comments and feedback received from the Committee: • Studio and 1-bedroom properties are not to be considered the same; • Increase of Studio occupancy from 2 to 3 occupants, with one occupant being 12 years of age or younger; • Increase of 1-bedroom occupancy from 2 to 4 occupants, with 2 occupants being 12 years of age or younger; • Maintain recommendation on occupancy level for 2-bedroom properties at 4 occupants; • Maintain recommendation on occupancy level for 3-bedroom properties at 6 occupants. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Committee Members Caldwell/McDonough to approve the density sub-committee report with recommendations to modify short-term vacation rental occupancy limits. Motion passed: ayes 11, noes 3, absent 1 (Navarro). 3. APPROVE DENSITY SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS TO INCLUDE SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROPERTY DENSITY LIMITS Committee Member Caldwell provided an overview of the proposed recommendations for density limits on STVRs: • Divide STVR community into 2 groups: homeshares and standard STVRs; • Homeshares would be exempt from density limitations; • Single family STVR properties would be subject to one STVR property per 300-foot radius of another permitted property; • Condominium complexes consisting of 4 or more units would be subject to 2 STVR properties per 300-foot radius; • STVRs within Tourist Commercial Zones would be exempt from density limitations; • A variety of recommendations on how density recommendations can be implemented successfully. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Committee Members Church/Spinney to approve density sub-committee report with 786 STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE Page 5 of 5 NOVEMBER 5, 2020 MEETING MINUTES recommendations to include short-term vacation rental property density limits. Motion passed: ayes 10, noes 4, absent 1 (Navarro). STUDY SESSION – items taken out of agenda order 1. DISCUSS MARKETING SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT AND UPDATE Committee Member McDonough provided an update to the Committee on the focus of the Marketing Sub-Committee. They will continue to work on a host checklist, Good Neighbor/Good Guest brochure, develop host training and best practices for hosts, create a violation notice/supplement for guests to receive, and research the creation of a welcome video for guests. Chair Schutz informed the Committee that all recommendations have been approved, therefore no further sub-committee meetings are needed for density, enforcement, and permitting. The Committee reached a general consensus that the next regularly scheduled Committee Meeting of December 3, 2020, will be the Committee’s final meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Franco/Grotsky to adjourn this meeting at 5:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, LORI LORETT, Committee Secretary City of La Quinta, California 787 788 POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 15, 2020 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 1 City Council December 15, 2020 1 City Council December 15, 2020 Closed Session In Progress 2 1 2 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 2 City Council December 15, 2020 Presentations 3 4 3 4 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 3 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 B5 – Business Relief Program Update 5 Relief Program Overview •Loan Program: $500K to 51 Businesses •Rebate Program: $123K to 33 Businesses •Al Fresco Program: $132k to 13 Restaurants •Rent Relief Program: $378K to over 55 Businesses •Total: $1.13M to 88 Businesses 6 5 6 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 4 Proposed Revisions (1) •Prompted by December 3, 2020 Regional Stay Home Order •Cap total relief possible: $50,000 •Grant Program: $10k/Business 7 Proposed Revisions (2) •Funds only for eligible expenses related to business operations •Provide proof of hardship and expenses •Comply with State Orders 8 7 8 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 5 Who Qualifies? •Previous recipients eligible up to $50,000 •Local small businesses w/ physical storefront •Personal Care Industry, Restaurants, Retail •Must provide proof of hardship 9 Budget Overview •$900,000* remaining Program Budget •Maximum of up to $10,000 Grant •Could provide for up to 90 businesses •First-come, first-served basis *Estimate with anticipated awards to-date (12-10-20)10 9 10 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 6 Timeline and Process •All applications to be submitted online: www.laquintaca.gov/covid19businessloan •Opens: Friday, December 18, 2020 at 8am •Closes: Monday, January 25, 2021 at 5pm •All requested materials must be provided 11 Questions/Comments 12 11 12 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 7 13 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 S1 – Short-Term Vacation Rental Program Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations 14 13 14 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 8 Summary •City has continuously sought improvements to STVR Program  •Regulations have been updated to provide clarity, streamline  processes, and provide more enforcement tools for  compliance •Recent Code Update to the STVR regulations •Maintain a balance between ensuring residents’ quality of life and  property owners’ ability to host STVRs 15 STVR Program Ad Hoc Committee •November 2019 – Council approved formation of an Ad‐Hoc  Committee to review the STVR Program and make advisory  recommendations to Council:   o Current regulations o Application and permit process  o Compliance and enforcement o Outreach and marketing •February 2020 – Council appointed 15 individuals to serve on  the Committee. 16 15 16 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 9 STVR Program Ad Hoc Committee Gavin Schutz, Chair Michelle McDonough, Vice Chair Lawrence Best Marty Butler Mary Caldwell Stella Church Vidal Coronel Gabriel Franco Kelly Grotsky Lori Jonasson Malia Monroe Jorge Navarro Sally Shelton Derek Spinney Jelena Tamm 17 STVR Program Ad Hoc Committee Committee created four subcommittees: 1) Enforcement/Compliance 2) Density/Over-concentration 3) Marketing 4) Permitting 18 17 18 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 10 STVR Program Ad Hoc Committee Gavin Schutz, Chair 19 Committee Recommendations December 3, 2020 – concluded deliberations and approved final recommendations. Table of Recommendations color-coded: 20 19 20 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 11 21 22 21 22 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 12 23 24 23 24 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 13 25 26 25 26 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 14 27 28 27 28 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 15 29 30 29 30 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 16 31 32 31 32 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 17 33 34 33 34 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 18 35 36 35 36 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 19 37 38 37 38 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 20 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 PH1 – Pavilion Palms Shopping Center 39 Vicinity Map 40 39 40 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 21 Summary •Planning Commission (PC) recommended approval in December 2019 •Council has been reviewing this project since early 2020 41 Proposal •Requested Entitlements –Specific Plan Amendment 2017-0002 –Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 –Site Development Permit 2017-0009 –Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 42 41 42 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 22 Proposal •125,000 sq. ft. shopping center •0.23 FAR •13 buildings •63,000 sq. ft. Pavilions Anchor –Drive-through pharmacy –12 pump gas station w/825 sq. ft. mini mart 43 Proposal •4,400 sq. ft. retail building •11,700 sq. ft. multi-tenant building •Five buildings along Jefferson Street frontage –2,000 to 5,151 sq. ft. with two drive-throughs •Four buildings along Avenue 50 frontage –3,500 to 8,214 sq. ft. 44 43 44 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 23 45 Pavilions 46 45 46 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 24 Pavilions 47 Pavilions Fuel Center WEST/EAST ELEVATION                                      NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATION 48 47 48 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 25 Shops 1 49 Retail 1 50 49 50 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 26 Building 3 51 Building 4 52 51 52 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 27 Building 5 53 Building 6 54 53 54 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 28 Jefferson/Ave 50 Corner 55 Corner Plaza 56 55 56 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 29 Planning Commission Review •At October hearing, applicant presented design revisions and enhanced plaza area exhibits –Revised architecture of buildings at corner of Jefferson and Avenue 50 –Height extends up to 35 feet, in excess of 22-foot height standard for image corridors •Council recommended PC Review 57 Planning Commission Review •On November 24, PC reviewed request to add provision to Specific Plan to allow height above 22 feet within 150 feet of Jefferson and Avenue 50 •The motion to recommend adding this provision did not pass 58 57 58 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 30 Environmental Assessment •Initial Study adopted in 1999 for original approval –New proposal substantially similar to original •Initial Study for proposal analyzed s.f. difference of new project •Mitigation measures proposed to reduce impacts to less than significant •Revisions do not introduce any new significant impacts 59 Alternatives 1. Adopt MND and approve SPA, TPM and SDP as presented 2. Adopt MND and approve SPA, TPM and SDP, except Buildings 5 and 6 –Modify SDP approval to include only Pavilions Building, Retail 1, Shops 1, Buildings 3, 4, and 7 –Applicant submit subsequent SDP for Buildings 5 and 6 and obtain approval prior to issuance of C of O for Pavilions building 3. Not adopt the MND and not approve the SPA, TPM and SDP –Another commercial project could be developed under the existing 2002 entitlement 4. Continue public hearing to date certain –PC review Buildings 5 & 6 60 59 60 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 31 61 62 61 62 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 32 63 64 63 64 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 33 65 66 65 66 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 34 67 68 67 68 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 35 69 70 69 70 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 36 71 72 71 72 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 37 73 74 73 74 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 38 75 76 75 76 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 39 77 78 77 78 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 40 79 80 79 80 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 41 81 82 81 82 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 42 83 84 83 84 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 43 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 PH2 – Site Development Permit Amendment Signature at PGA West 85 Background •Eden Rock at PGA West approved 2008 for ~42 acre residential project within PGA •Changed to Signature at PGA West - approved 2013 86 85 86 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 44 Background •Signature was for 130 single family detached and 100 condo units •SDP “Haciendas” and “Estates” plan types •24 single family units constructed 87 Vicinity Map 88 87 88 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 45 Haciendas-Existing 89 Haciendas 90 89 90 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 46 Estates 91 Estates 92 91 92 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 47 Proposal •Applicant requests Site Development Permit Amendment to change plan types •No changes to site design, lot numbers or sizes, or development standards 93 Proposal •Haciendas: –Ranging from 1,773 – 2,009 sf –All 1-story –Spanish Colonial, Tuscan, and Santa Barbara •Estates: –2,131 – 2,530 sf –Three 1-story, and one 2-story –Spanish Colonial, Tuscan, and Santa Barbara 94 93 94 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 48 Analysis •Main changes: –Reduction in square footages –Removal of Andalusian style and introduction of Santa Barbara style –Removal of many original second story elements 95 Site Plan 96 95 96 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 49 Haciendas - New Plans 97 Haciendas - New Plans 98 97 98 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 50 Estates - New Plans 99 Estates - New Plans 100 99 100 City Council Meeting December 15, 2020 51 101 HAND OUTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 15, 2020 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - HAND-OUT BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 15, 2020 1 From: Sent:Saturday, December 12, 2020 1:27 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:STVR City Council Meeting 12/15/2020  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Mayor Evans and City Council Members, Happy Holidays to all! As La Quinta residents and homeowners, we would like to share our thoughts about the upcoming City Council meeting regarding STVR's. *A decision to place any type of limitations on STVR's would not be fair and equal to existing home owners. 1. 300 ft. (or any number of feet) rule would reward certain homes and devalue others. It would also potentially cause a worse noise and complaint problem by spreading them throughout the city. 2. Capping STVR's in a given neighborhood or area would reward current license holders and disallow others from obtaining a license and devalue those homes as well. 3. The current moratorium is handcuffing home owners who wish to sell or rent as a STVR possibly to make ends meet to stay in their home. If you want to sell and currently have STVR's next to or near your home, you may have trouble finding a buyer. So are you stuck in your home because you can't sell to people who don't like the STVR's and you can't sell to the people who want your home as a STVR? The City is really limiting the potential buyers pool for those wanting to sell. There are life changing events for all people including retirement, death, major illness, job change, etc. that would cause a home owner to sell or be able subsidize income by renting in order to stay in their home. Once the meeting on 12/15 is concluded a decision should be made and the current moratorium should be lifted immediately. *It seems like the committee is trying to come up with limitations and restrictions instead of addressing current or new rules enforcement of the STVR's. The City needs to properly staff or contract out the resources to adequately address STVR issues. TOT and perhaps an increase in the license fee would help to properly fund additional support services. Enforcing current and or new rules would minimize complaints and would allow existing and new home owners equitable opportunities to use their homes as STVR's. *The only other fair option would be to ban ALL STVR's. This would eventually balance the home values to be fair and equitable for all home owners. The immediate impact may cause a saturation of homes for sale which may effect the market. It would also have a negative financial impact on City TOT income and may impact tourism in the City. *To conclude, the City has already set the precedent of STVR's, there's no going back or changing the rules in the middle of the game. Any limitations/restrictions on STVR's would be detrimental to home owners and the City. The bottom line is that the rules need to be enforced or ban STVR's altogether. As they say in real estate, time is of the essence, if the City is allowing ANY STVR's, the current moratorium needs to be lifted immediately. Ron & Tara Alford La Quinta, CA 92253 CITY COUNCIL MEETING – DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS RON & TARA ALFORD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Edward Armendarez <> Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 1:37 PM To:City Clerk Mail; Monika Radeva Subject:Written Comments/Please Read Re: STVR Study Session Attachments:STVR Ltr. Council 121520.pdf  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Hi Monika.  I wrote this letter that I’d like to submit to Council and Jon McMillen in response to the STVR issue being  discussed today.  I’m attaching a pdf of it for distribution to them and for inclusion in the records.   Monica, can you please read this letter at the appropriate time.  I’m sorry to ask, but I get too nervous.  Last time I think  even more of my hair turned gray (silver!).  Thank you,  Edward Armendarez    PLEASE READ  Edward Armendarez    La Quinta Cove  December 15, 2020  Re: STVR Enforcement and Elimination  Dear Mayor Evans, Mayor Pro Tem Peña, Councilwoman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Radi, Councilman Sanchez, and City  Manager McMillen,  I would like to add my voice to those that are asking for an indefinite moratorium on STVRs.  For many reasons that I have previously brought to your attention, I hope that ultimately, you will support the  elimination of these mini‐motels from the Cove neighborhood.  Enforcement of STVRs in residential neighborhoods has proven elusive to our neighboring cities of Palm Desert, Rancho  Mirage and Cathedral City, which have all banned them in residential zones.  Is the City of La Quinta effectively enforcing STVRs?  During this present lockdown, where a special notice was given  specifying the exact circumstances in which a STVR may accept renters, has the City instituted any kind of plan to test  that these rules are being followed?  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT EDWARD ARMENDAREZ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 I know first hand that STVR owners here in the Cove are continuing to rent to outsiders in violation of the City’s (and  State’s) ordinances.  Bringing outsiders in during this pandemic threatens our community with the spread of Covid‐19,  and if they should become ill, they will occupy ICU space that a resident might need.    The City can direct staff to try booking reservations here and see for themselves.  Do they do that?  Can we hold the  hosting sites in violation, or do they continue to operate with impunity?  How much do these kinds of enforcement  measures cost the City?    These specific costs are just a small portion of the actual costs it would take to adequately enforce STVRs in our  City.  The enforcement costs might seem worth the TOT STVRs generate, but that’s because the City isn’t enforcing  them.  It’s low because it’s not enough.    In addition, what is the cost of a neighbor, waking up and having to call a hotline, and wait, and try and go back to  sleep?  What is the cost of neighbors on the front line of enforcement?  Please consider that the cost of STVRs, mini‐motels in our neighborhoods, should not be the burden of residents,  neighbors, nor should it be the burden of our City, paid for by our tax dollars.  Thank you for your kind consideration of this issue,    Edward Armendarez    CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT EDWARD ARMENDAREZ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From: Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 10:10 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comment/Communication to the La Quinta City Council Re: STVRs PUBLIC COMMENT - Meeting 12/15/2020  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   DO NOT LIFT THE MORATORIUM ON STVRs! I am writing to you today in regards to the Short Term Vacation Rental issue in La Quinta. I live on Avenida Alvarado, lower cove, and know of one home that is a vacation rental near me (right next door). I moved earlier this year from Avenida Rubio, mid cove, and was aware of two homes that were short term vacation rentals. My parents, who have lived here since 2003 live on on Avenida Alvarado, upper cover, and are surrounded by short term vacation rentals. I am not aware if ANY of these Short Term Vacation Rentals are registered properly or not. However the house next door has been rented out CONSTANTLY since at least May. Rotating renters every few days to a week. About a year ago, we were told by our landlords of 12 years that we had 60 days to move out. The search began. This search was extremely difficult, as there were not many homes on the long term rental market. Yet I could see MANY homes sat empty. Not only the lack of options, but the rental prices were extremely high. It was a shock to see how much the price for rentals had increased. The few places we were able to find, we around $2,000 a month, definitely not affordable. We got lucky in the last couple of weeks with a friend of a friend that wasn't looking for long term renters at the time, but was willing to help us out. We have lived in the cove since May, 2008. Our son was almost 2 when we moved here. We then had a daughter in 2010. My children have attended Ben Franklin Elementary, La Quinta Middle, and now one is in La Quinta High. My family has loved living in La Quinta, and what the La Quinta community has to offer. However over the years I have noticed how many homes are turning into vacation rentals. This does not allow for communities to form. How can it when there are new occupants every few days? Do you really expect these short term renters to care about OUR community? Angelina Arriaga La Quinta, CA 92253 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ANGELINA ARRIAGA STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From: Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 9:43 AM To:City Clerk Mail Cc: Subject:Written Comments / December 15th Mtg  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Dear La Quinta City Council,  Thank you for taking the time to address an important topic of Short‐Term Rentals.  My wife and I have used Airbnb for  our short‐term rental, our rental is also our primary residence.  We rent our place when we are going to be gone for long  weekends or longer, we have neighbors on both sides of us, and we have not had any complaints since we started  renting our place.  We are very clear and strict with our communication to our renters prior to accepting their  reservation.   Home owners who are obeying the rules should not be punished for those who don’t.  We believe the penalties should  be scaled in severity from the beginning.  1st complaint could have a fine of $500‐1000, second offence could be a  suspension of STVR license for three months, and the third strike you are suspended for one year and need to submit a  new license request, with notification to  your neighbors to approve.  Please do not take away the ability to supplement our declining income, we love la Quinta, we love our community, and  we are accountable for what happens in our home.  Thank you,  Marty & Judy Briesach  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS MARTY & JUDY BRIESACH STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Toby Browning Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 1:00 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Dear La Quinta City Council: My name is John Browning. I am a full-time resident of La Quinta Cove since 2011. My address is . I am writing in regards to the STVR issues we face in our city. Many of our neighboring cites have recently done away with or severely curtailed operation of STVR'S in non HOA areas. They have come to this action after many years of trying to make STVRs work for all involved. It seems that the deciding factor in many of these cases, both locally and around the country, has been the the inability of the city to enforce the rules and regulations pertaining to STVRs. Many of these cities adopted increasingly strict laws over the last decade. At the end of the day, the continued bad behavior of STVR tenants, the inability to enforce laws and the cost to the city, were determining factors in cancelling their STVR programs. Most of our neighboring cities took these actions having only a fraction of active STVR permits (200- 400) vs. La Quinta's 1300-1400 active permits. It is my understanding that many more permits are waiting in the wings to activate in La Quinta. All the laws in world are useless if they cannot be strictly enforced. It has been my personal experience from being the president of a condo HOA in Los Angeles, that the only way bad owner/tenant behavior changes, is if if costs the offending party money. Otherwise, people will get away with as much as they are able to. Then, there is the issue of changing the complexion of our single family zoned non-HOA neighborhoods into small business districts with an ever growing density of mini hotels. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOHN BROWNING STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 The Cove in particular used to be a bastion for affordable family housing. Out of town STVR investors have both driven up the price and severely reduced the inventory of affordable housing in our city. And lastly, the full time residents of La Quinta were never given the opportunity to vote on whether we wanted STVR mini hotels in our community. I compare it to the electric scooter issues many cities have had to face. Large companies such as Lime and Uber literally dropped off thousands of scooters on city sidewalks without asking permission from anyone. Their response: "Deal with it" The issue of STVRs has finally come to a head and we are at long last dealing with it. I encourage the City Council to learn from other cities experiences and limit STVR's to HOA communities only. Going forward, full time residents of La Quinta will be keeping a very close eye on the City Council's promises and performance with regards to this issue. Restfully submitted, John Browning CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOHN BROWNING STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Bruce Cathcart Sent:Thursday, December 10, 2020 11:53 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments: STVR Committee Recommendations Council Meeting 12/15/2020  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Hi Nichole,  Thank you for your assistance on the phone this morning!  Below are my written comments for  the upcoming council meeting (12/15/2020).  Please reply email with your confirmation of  receipt and with any questions that you may have.   Dear Mayor Evans and La Quinta City Council Members,  At the upcoming council meeting scheduled for 12/15/2020 you will be reviewing the  recommendations from the STVR Committee with regard to proposed changes to the current  City STVR program and its rules and regulations.  In making your decision on how to best  proceed regarding the committee’s recommendations I wanted to make sure that you are  aware of a couple of items that will hopefully help you to make an informed decision that will  be fair and just to all concerned.  In the event that you have not watched the videos of the Committee’s meetings posted on the  City’s website It should be pointed out that the committee is comprised of a ratio of  approximately 2:1 with members that are opposed to STVRs in the majority; and that NONE of  their recommendations to the Council were unanimously approved by its membership.  This  bias against STVR’s can be seen in their recommendations and should be strongly considered  as their selective data is presented upon which their conclusions and recommendations have  been made.  To my knowledge the Committee was never specifically asked by the Council or staff to  address the issue of “Density” regarding the STVR program, yet it is one of their cornerstone  issues/recommendations.  Their proposed recommendation of limiting individual STVR’s to a  radius of 300 feet, if approved by the Council, would destroy the City’s STVR program at a cost  of millions of dollars in real estate value and severely reduce the current revenue stream to  the City through loss of TOT and the associated loss of retail sales and services.  The  implementation of such a measure would create and administrative nightmare for the City  staff that would result in an unfair process of elimination of several existing STVR’s and send  CITY COUNCIL MEETING – DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT BRUCE CATHCART STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 out a loud and clear message to the investor community that the City of La Quinta is no longer  STVR “Friendly”.  In addition, this would have an immediate and detrimental effect on all of  the current homeowners living adjacent to an existing STVR who may be considering selling  their home.  A case in point is a listing that I currently have where a retired couple living next  door to an STVR are looking to downsize and have put their house on the market for sale.  It  went into escrow with a buyer that intended to make it their primary residence but when they  discovered that it was next door to an STVR they cancelled the escrow.  The house is now back  in escrow with an individual who intends to utilize the home as an STVR when not being  personally used… but if the 300 foot recommendation is adopted by the Council this buyer will  also cancel his escrow.  So under these circumstances the retired couple will not be able to sell  their home unless they significantly discount their price and find a homeowner willing to live  next door to an STVR.  Clearly there are other ways to address the issue of density and/or the  overall number of STVR units IF and WHEN this even becomes an issue.  The Council’s current  approach to education, increased penalties, better administration of the program and  increased code enforcement is the right approach at this time.  Just as we have overcome the  stigma associated with the City’s subsidized low‐income rental program through these  measures, so too will they eliminate the majority of the issues currently associated with the  City’s STVR program.  But now is NOT the time to address the matter of density and in order to  protect those individuals trying to sell their homes currently adjacent to STVR’s and to restore  STVR property owner and investor confidence and in the STVR program the Council should  consider removing this recommendation from their consideration immediately.    Respectfully Submitted,    Bruce Y. Cathcart Bruce Y Cathcart Broker, La Quinta Palms Realty “Your Friendly Professionals” 51001 Eisenhower Dr. La Quinta, CA. 92253 License #00915271  Office: (760) 564-4104 Cell: (760) 275-3095 FAX: (760) 564-0344       CITY COUNCIL MEETING – DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT BRUCE CATHCART STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Mark Chapman Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 10:15 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Changes to STR Code Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Regarding today’s meeting about Short Term Rentals,   I would like to voice my support for continuing to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals within the City of La Quinta.  This is  a boost to tourism and tax revenues.  I am also strongly against the radius restrictions.  Any restrictions of this nature should be left to the individual HOAs and  residents.  I DO support  the penalties for repeat offenders of noise violations and “parties” or neighborhood disturbances.  While I want STR to continue, it should not adversely affect the quality of life of other residents.  And again, I think this is  being effectively managed by HOA and related committees.  Sincerely,  Mark Chapman  PGA West Howeowner  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARK CHAPMAN STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS     Dear Council and Mayor,     Those teachers I was talking about your STVR program pricing out of the cove are not hypothetical.  It is me.      I lived in a home in the cove for 6 and a half years waiting until the heirs were able to sell it.  Unfortunately, by  the time they were able, the height of the STVR craze was in full swing. As a result, they priced it at $55K over  the appraisal.  It sold for $25k over the appraisal and needed $40k to bring it to code. Who would buy that I  thought?  You issued her STVR license on October 14th.       This left me looking for a new home.  I was very concerned that I needed to settle immediately so work was  not interrupted.  Purchasing a home looked out of the question as everything was over‐priced and going  contingent in 48 hours.  There were absolutely no long‐term rentals on the market.  I was stunned.  22 hours  after a place was listed, I called.  They said you are fourth in line.  You will only get it if the three before you  cannot pass a credit check.    I got MORE aggressive and put a notification on all sites.  When one came up on my phone, I called at my  lunch hour.  They said it was gone.  I had just received notice an hour prior.  The next time a notification came  in, my phone was on my desk, in front of my class.  I said excuse me and I called and told the management  company: “I’ll take it. I will zelle you a thousand dollars right now.” She said, “No, you need to see it first.”  I  told her I didn’t.  Confused, she said, “yes you do…” I said, “I know how this goes. I am going to get there, and  it will be gone.  I want you, on your honor, to tell me that if your mother wants that house, I am first”.    I was so desperate I was stopping class to make a personal call in front of students.    After I saw the house, the property manager ran my credit and called my landlord reference and told me, “You  are every landlord’s dream.”  I said, “I know that but if there isn’t a house on the market for me to rent, what  good is that?    I am making this story ridiculously brief compared to all that happened.    By the time I got the keys I had only six hours to move everything from one home to another and so had it  piled in the center of the living room.  No matter.  I had I place to put my head because, “I HAD TO GO TO  WORK.  MY STUDENTS NEED ME”.    I couldn’t allow myself to get in this position again so immediately went back to work on finding a home to  purchase.  Things looked dismal.  One day after weeks of searching, I found myself at an open house in a home  I could not afford.  The kind and sympathetic broker there told me, “You will need to get your name on the  investor’s list of every real estate brokerage in this valley.  When one gets a listing, they hammer that  investors’ list for double dipping on commission and you will never see a house on the market that those  investors have not turned down.    In the meantime, I put in offers on two homes in need of repair. I was outbid by STVR investors as the seller’s  agents told me.  In fact, one called my agent and told her that the owner was requesting if I could go up just a  little on the offer because the investors had offered so much over the ask and she couldn’t justify not taking  it…but she didn’t want to sell to them.  She really wanted to sell to the teacher.    I told my agent no.  I don’t have a spare 20k to overpay on a house due to false STVR inflation.  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARCIA CUTCHIN STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS       Then, I sent out yet another 100 letters to owners in the cove.  There are probably people reading this who got  one.      I finally did get a house off market due to one of those letters.  I got everything put away in my new home and  was finally able to get up and hit the ground running as my essential job requires.  But I am an artist.  I make  art out of garbage I find in La Quinta.  Probably people read this now know me and have visited me in my  home, in the La Quinta Museum’s artist home show.      Sadly, I didn’t participate last year.  I couldn’t.  That circus, the frustration and desperation in my search for a  home and the move, took the candy out of me.  All of the art supplies are in a closet in the garage and I do not  know when I will have the will to take them out again.      When I tell you, you are driving teachers out of the cove…I mean that LITERALLY.  I do not believe anyone else  would have gone to the extremes I did to get a home here BECAUSE MY FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS ARE HERE.   THEY LOVE ME.  THEY SUPPORT ME AND COMFORT ME.  As determined and capable of an individual as I am, I  actually, CANNOT “just move somewhere else”.    While I have been in front of you, asking you to stop issuing licenses, I have been worried the market might be  affected.  Unlike STVR investors, I CARE ABOUT THE PEOPLE AROUND HERE.    The homes are all still going contingent and pending to NEW RESIDENTS, NEIGHBORS AND FRIENDS in just  days WITHOUT THE STVR nonsense.      PLEASE EXTEND THE MORATORIUM INDEFINETLY AND IF YOU DO NOT – A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE GOING TO  WANT TO KNOW WHY because there is a plethora of irrefutable evidence provided by thousands of  unimpeachable sources, that STVRs are not good for a community.       Sincerely  La Quinta citizen and resident,  Marcia L Cutchin                          CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARCIA CUTCHIN STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:nickey simon Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 7:12 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Telephonic Verbal Comments Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Dear La Quinta City Council, I wish to provide Telephonic Verbal Comments at the City Council Meeting on Dec 15, 2020. Here is my information: 1) Nicole Fitzenberger 2) and LaQuinta 3) 4) We have 2 properties and we follow all the guidelines and have had no issues with the short rental. We would like to continue. We pay sales tax on time, pay all the license fees and property taxes. Please do not change the city ordinance. This is why we purchased in your community. Thank you for your consideration. 5) Subject - Short-term Rentals in La Quinta 6) Telephonic Verbal Comments Thank you. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT NICOLE FITZENBERGER STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:First Class Cleaning Service <Customerservice@firstclasscleaningservice.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:12 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:La quinta vacation rentals  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Why vacation rentals in la quinta shouldn’t be banned   1. Loss of small business 2.loss of employment 3. tourism Thank you, -Natali Flores First Class Cleaning Service Phone: 760.574.4293 | Text: 760.574.4293 CustomerService@FirstClassCleaningService.Com FirstClassCleaningService.Com | Facebook | Instagram | Yelp This e-mail message, together with any documents, files and/or other messages attached to it, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY 1ST CLASS CLEANING SERVICE (FLORES) STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:dianne franco Sent:Sunday, December 13, 2020 7:06 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Citizen comment. STRV ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  I would like to express my option on STVR in the cove.  I live next door to one. When I have barking dog or overgrown landscape issues, or need the name of a good plumber, I  go to my neighbors!  We may have differences, but we work things out.  Next door I do not have a neighbor. I have a STRV property owner who owns multiple STRVs in LQ and The Valley, but  lives in LA.  These owners, while decent folks, do not have ownership of the behavior, noise, language, late night phone  calls. The constant irritation, being waken from sleep, etc, is quite overwhelming.  Could you please take my note to the council and city manager. I ask that they exercise their legal and ethical  responsibility to support us and not lift the moratorium on STRVs in our city.  Dianne Franco    Sent from my iPad  CITY COUNCIL MEETING – DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT DIANNE FRANCO STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:eileen ellis Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:41 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:written comment for STRV meeting, Dec 15  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   My name is Eileen Campbell Garcia, and I have been a proud resident of La Quinta for 12 years. We love living up in the Cove, with the mountain views, friendly neighbors, dark skies, and quiet nights. Over the last two years, the homes on either side of us have been converted into STVRs. The new owners of each house have never reached out to us. As I'm sure you know, the lots in the Cove are narrow - both homes are only 10 feet away from our home. The increase in noise, while guests are inside as well as outside, has been frustrating. Trash and parking are a problem. We have had to drag trash and recycling bins into their driveways after they have been left in the street for four days. Outside lights are left on all night, and continue to be left on even when there are no guests. The peace and quiet that we have enjoyed has been shattered. We have no idea who is living next door for the week or the weekend. The stress I feel from uncontrolled parties, yelling, and door slamming continues after the offense has ended. It leaves us in a constant state of alert for the next event. With enforcement, the pressure is on us to be the first responders. I am a working professional who needs to get up every morning and work, and I resent being awoken by parties at 3:00am. No amount of enforcement can address the constant influx of strangers and the damage inflicted upon residents' sense of security and well-being. I encourage La Quinta to join with other valley cities and phase out long- term rentals. Thank you, CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT EILEEN GARCIA STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 Eileen Campbell Garcia La Quinta, CA CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT EILEEN GARCIA STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Arlene Gotshalk La Quinta, CA Madam Mayor and Council Members, I am a full-time resident of the Cove neighborhood and ask you to continue the moratorium on issuing STVR permits as we work together to find acceptable mitigations to the exploding #s of STVRs in LQ. 6.3%. of the Cove is currently permitted STVRs, that’s approximately 290 homes. This is large number in a small area which does include home shares. Of course, does not include unpermitted STVRS. Disturbances of STVRs are a well-documented problem in the Valley as well as across our Nation WSJ Dec. 9, 2020, had a large article about unhappy neighbors fighting Airbnb. More than two dozen Arizona mayors wrote to Chief Executive Brian Chesky, outlining the detrimental impact of short-term rentals on their neighborhoods. They stated, “Neighbors are dedicating serious hours a day, spending out-of-pocket to solve an issue that should have never been theirs to solve…. A revolving door of strangers has made mothers lose their sense of safety and community.” The explosion of VRs demonstrates a strong demand for this type of housing, but, that need should not be satisfied in Residential Districts nor should the profits from that business be at the expense of local residents, especially not in the Cove. I have been reviewing the Zoning Ordinances that apply to the Cove and see that La Quinta City agrees that Resort VRs do not fit in the Cove District. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 9.30.040 RC Cove Residential District 9.40.030 Table of permitted uses. 9.60.110 Home occupations. 9.60.270 Bed and breakfast 3.25.020 STVRs Enterprise Resort residential subject to Section 9.60.310 (Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 325 § 1, 1998; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996 (Ord. 584 § 2, 2020; …. Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) (Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 325 § 1, 1998) Resort resident uses (Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 418 § 1, 2005; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) (Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997) Ord. 501 § 2, 2012 - 2019 Prohibited in the Cove Permitted for homeowner living in home and if accessory to the principal residential use Conducted only by homeowner residing therein as their principal place of residence. From 1996-1998, there are several Ordinance that define Residential districts and the accepted uses in these zones. In 1998, the Resort Residential Ordinance (9.40.030) stated that Resort Residential Use is PROHIBITED in the COVE. The intent was to protect the Cove from Resort lodging and its commercial developments. The prohibition of Resort Residential in the Cove has not been revoked; therefore, it seems that same intent to prohibit Resort Lodging in the Cove would also prohibit STVRs which are Resort Lodging, mini commercial motels. A Home Share, under the Home Occupation permit, would fit the qualifications for a use permit. This would help to “maintain the essential character of a neighborhood and the stability of a community… and the welfare of the citizenry”. A goal stated in the California Supreme Court in Ewing v City of Carmel-by-the-Sea (1991) We can work together to develop a plan to protect Residential Neighborhoods. Some suggestions that have been discussed are: • Only Home shares in the Cove and other Residential Districts • Build more commercial STVR communities like Legacy • Phase out whole house VR and then market to telecommuters to relocate to LQ I respectfully ask you to continue the Moratorium on issuing STVR permits as we move forward together to settle on solutions for all residents. Thank you, Arlene Gotshalk CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 As to Part 1.d, the committee does not recommend a code inspection on the property prior to granting an STVR license. What is the rationale for not insisting upon this inspection? It would prevent some of the very issues that are identified in the report. An inspection would verify number of bedrooms, living arrangements, and that all aspects of the application are accurate. In cases where the applicant is found to have willingly provided false data on the application, the applicant would be denied the right to a license for a particular time period, such as one year. We already know that a certain percentage of people applying will not behave correctly and will provide false information. Don’t reward these people by turning a blind eye. I suggest the Council REJECT this recommendation and instead insist that a inspection be done prior to any grant of a license. If there is a delay due to staffing issues, so be it. We have enough short term rentals as it is. As to Part 5, the committee does not recommend notification to all neighbors on all sides and across the street from the applicant’s property, along with the provision of various information to the neighbors. What is the rational for not notifying the neighbors. If it’s cost, then that’s a non-issue, given that the cost of doing so should be borne by the applicant. Increase the cost of the license to cover this most important notification. All neighbors should absolutely be aware that a home or unit in their neighborhood may soon be occupied by transient visitors. It’s a matter of courtesy as well as safety. It also puts everyone in the neighborhood on high alert to be on the lookout for visitors. It has the added bonus of keeping the applicant honest and in many cases, no doubt the applicant will be more diligent about not only who rents the property but also the information that the applicant relays to the renters, such as about noise restrictions and trash issues. All around, it’s win-win. I suggest the Council REJECT this recommendation and instead insist that all neighbors adjacent to and across the street from an applicant property be provided with the stated information. As to Part 11.c, this issue is identical to Part 1.a above, and for the same reasons stated, I suggest the Council REJECT this recommendation and instead insist upon a way to at least have the hotline staffed by knowledgeable people at the most critical times. COMMENTS TO STVR AD HOC COMMITTEE VIOLATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS Agree with all. COMMENTS TO STVR AD HOC COMMITTEE PERMITTING RECOMMENDATIONS Agree with all, except Item 21, where the committee does not recommend notification to all neighbors on all sides and across the street from the applicant’s property, along CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOHN GUERRINI STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 3 with the provision of various information to the neighbors. Similar to Part 5 above, this makes no sense. What is the rational for not notifying the neighbors. If it’s cost, then that’s a non-issue, given that the cost of doing so should be borne by the applicant. Increase the cost of the license to cover this most important notification. All neighbors should absolutely be aware that a home or unit in their neighborhood may soon be occupied by transient visitors. It’s a matter of courtesy as well as safety. It also puts everyone in the neighborhood on high alert to be on the lookout for visitors. It has the added bonus of keeping the applicant honest and in many cases, no doubt the applicant will be more diligent about not only who rents the property but also the information that the applicant relays to the renters, such as about noise restrictions and trash issues. All around, it’s win-win. I suggest the Council REJECT this recommendation and instead insist that all neighbors adjacent to and across the street from an applicant property be provided with the stated information and that the applicant be required to pay for any cost associated with the process as well as that the applicant be required to perform the various obligations spelled out at Parts 21 a, b, c and d. COMMENTS TO STVR AD HOC COMMITTEE OCCUPANCY AND PROPERTY DENSITY RECOMMENDATIONS Agree with all, though would not be opposed to a density recommendation greater than 300 feet, because measuring density using distance alone can present an unjust result. Some communities will have five homes within the 300 feet. Others will have 40 homes. If you’re going to use distance as the sole measurement, then consider increasing to 375 feet or more. COMMENTS TO STVR AD HOC COMMITTEE MARKETING PRIOERTIES RECOMMENDATIONS Agree with all. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOHN GUERRINI STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Corey Gulbranson Sent:Friday, December 11, 2020 2:02 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   1) Corey Gulbranson 2) Costa Mesa, CA 3) 4) Consent Calendar Item #8 and Study Session #1 5) Changes to STVRs 6) I am urging the City Council to resist from making any changes to STVRs this year.  STVR owners have been extremely adversely affected by COVID and do not need further bureaucratic regulations to complicate things even more than they  already are. The vast majority of STVR properties and operators are a huge positive for this city.  We generate a ton of  revenue for the city and are helping the city cope with one of the worst financial disasters since its founding.  Stop  hindering mutual success with your over‐regulation!  Enough is enough!    Corey Gulbranson  Shorecrest Real Estate, Inc.  949‐294‐8717  corey@shorecrestinc.com  www.shorecrestinc.com  CA DRE #01778954  CA CSLB #B993064  CITY COUNCIL MEETING – DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT COREY GULBRANSON STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:The Hersoms Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 8:13 AM To:Monika Radeva Subject:STVR Suggestions Attachments:STVR Suggestions.pdf  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Monica,   Here's the message again with the attachment redone.  Eric  We bought a nice home in Fairways and have been operating a very responsible STVR in addition to coming here  ourselves.  We bought here because La Quinta allows STVR's, so taking that away would violate precedent.  We support  the attached matrix of ideas.   Thanks, Eric and Lisa Hersom  La Quinta  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS ERIC & LISA HERSOM STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS ERIC & LISA HERSOM STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From: Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 3:48 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:6 WRITTEN COMMENTS ON SHORT TERM LEASING  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Linda L. and Kenneth R. Hood         La Quinta CA. 92253     We have lived in La Quinta, Ca. for 32 years in two different homes.  I oppose the City Council restriction on short term leasing.    I believe homeowners should be able to use their property as they wish.  The current laws need to be enforced.  Linda L. Hood  Kenneth R.Hood  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS LINDA & KENNETH HOOD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:De Karlen Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 10:30 AM To:Monika Radeva; City Clerk Mail Cc:Linda Evans; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Robert Radi; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen Subject:Written Comments - DO NOT LIFT MORATORIUM ON STRs........(Public Comments)  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   December 14, 2020  Re: DO NOT LIFT MORATORIUM ON STRs  Public Comment  Short Term Rentals are a blight on the soul and spirit of neighborhoods. And, La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, is, most definitely, neighbors and neighborhoods: first-time homebuyers, retirees, Neighborhood Watchers, young families, golfers, hikers, and more. That’s what neighborhoods are. That is, until recently…   Mayor Linda Evans, her City Council, and City Manager have collectively turned our beautiful, Cahuilla culturally-significant, and historic town into a dreaded Short Term Rental industry, which includes not only the political class, but also local and national rental agencies (airbnb, et al) and real estate agents marketing the area as STR-friendly. The benefit to all three? Money, of course.  And, what is the benefit to homeowners living in STR neighborhoods – nothing!  Quite the opposite. The cons to afflicted neighborhoods are legion and well documented. Here are a few cons neighbors can expect with STRs:  Noise – music, parties, yelling Multiple cars, taking up spaces used by residents – no one is monitoring how many people are actually staying in a STR house People from outside the area, with no commitment peace and privacy of a residential neighborhood OR to the larger community, going in and out of houses on a conveyor belt STRs are simply money-making entities and, more often than not, do not follow the same rules as nearby hotels are required to follow STRs operating under the radar without a permit Very, very easy for STRs to break the rules, with little or no oversight And NO, it is not neighbors’ jobs to police STRs – that is the job of La Quinta’s elected officials and City departments Of seven homes adjacent to us, three are STRs (43% of seven houses), with two of the others a likely possibility in the future. The three current STRs had renters this last weekend in violation of the moratorium.  The STR on our left is worth further mention...last October at 10:30 pm, someone began furiously pounding our front door with one of our garden ornaments, screaming unintelligibly, and trying to break in. We called the police. Two hours, two fire engines, two police cars, and a paramedic vehicle later, family members finally were located at a casino to retrieve the individual. It was determined the person was quite inebriated and very likely mentally unstable. Unknown to us, this person and family were staying in the STR next door (airbnb rental; owners live on the coast). A frightening event. The police report is on file.  This is only one story of many locally and nationally. Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, and Indian Wells officials listened to their constituents and took action against STRs – yet, La Quinta’s leaders appear tone deaf. Let's put this relationship into perspective…YOU are elected to represent US, not the STR industry! You are not doing that. More importantly, we’re tired of elected CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLI COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS ROBERT & DE KARLEN STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 officials not listening, in order to further their own agendas (the ad hoc committee will only rubber stamp Mayor/Council). You’ve awakened the “sleeping giant.” We’re furious and we’re not going away!!!  Robert and De Karlen    La Quinta, CA 92253    CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLI COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS ROBERT & DE KARLEN STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Mel Keating Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 4:34 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:STVR Comments for the Dec. 15, 2020 City Council Meeting Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   TO THE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL:  Regarding STVR Rules and Regulations for the City Council Meeting on 12/15/20  I am a STVR owner.  I would like to make some suggestions regarding the city’s plans to implement code enforcements.  In regard to contacting the local contact within 45 minutes:  I feel that if the local contact doesn’t answer the phone (especially if it is late at night) that the second option should be  to contract the owner’s phone number next.  I do not understand why your policy would not be to contact the owner or  manager first before a violation is made.  This doesn’t make sense.  Regarding fine amounts:  I feel a $500 fine is more than enough to get the point across.  If I were fined $1,000, I would seriously be losing too  much money.    In regard to the suggestion of not having STVR’s within 300 feet of each other:  I feel this should not apply to current STRV licenses.  It could apply to new licenses.  However, it could be infringing on a  person’s right of livelihood, and their ability to make money.  What if one home within 300 feet, only rents out a room?  In regard to the no amplified music:  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY MELANIE KEATING STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 We have had no issues with our guests playing music too loud.  I am aware of the “No Amplified Sounds” in the  backyard.  My question to the council is, “Does that rule then apply to every person living in a home in La  Quinta?”  These rules/codes should apply to everyone, and when one thinks about them…does that one makes sense.  I  could see the rule/code stating a decibel of loudness limitation.     We purchased our second home in La Quinta in 2019, planning to enjoy the home part‐time and renting it out part‐ time.  This is our first year doing this.  We extensively remodeled the home inside and out.  We are sure this helped the  community and helped raise property values nearby.  We have had no complaints with our rental, and we have made  our neighbors all aware of how to contact us if there were problems.  We have a strong Rental Agreement and only rent  to people over the age of 25.     I feel that there seems to be a lot of credence given to the groups that are complaining about issues, but I really wonder  if there is such a huge problem with most of the STVR’s.  I do feel that the continued exacerbation and continued  planned limitations and rules are extreme.       Sincerely,  Melanie Keating  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY MELANIE KEATING STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Julie Kimmel Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 9:16 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:STR-Comments on Committee Recommendations Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Good day, My name is Juliana Kimmel and I am a property owner at PGA West and host it on Airbnb and VRBO on a part time basis when I am not there. I purchased the condo in 2018 as a second home with the goal of spending much of my time there post retirement. I have a business license, STR city permit, and a permit with my HOA. I have some comments regarding the recommendations made by the committee regarding changes to the STR rules in La Quinta. First, let me say that I am a proud host. I am so happy to share the beauty of La Quinta with guests. I screen them very carefully. My condo is a place I cherish and I care about the community, and the neighborhood. Being able to host allows me to help with expenses, and make improvements when I am not there. I chose to purchase in La Quinta in part because of the city's active STR program. This represented to me a stable situation, time proven and a commitment by the city not to shut down the ability to STR with harsh rules that squeeze out owners. I am fully in favor of the taxes that the city collects on STR.s I feel strongly this is a win for the city not only in terms of the taxes but in the money spent by guests in the city for entertainment, food etc. Also, many properties are second homes and the ability to short term rent is a a factor stabilizing the housing market. Specifically my issues with the recommendations: 1. The 300 foot radius concept. I do not know how many other STRs are in my 300 foot radius but my ability to rent should be independent of the choice of my neighbors to offer their property for rent. This would be very unequal treatment of property owners. Are you going to revoke permits? Not renew them? Are you going to provide notification to all property for sale that they can not STR? If all STR rentals are following the rules, what difference does this concentration make? Is this a covert move to do away with STRs in La Quinta? Where did the very high radius figure and very low number of rental units per radius come from? 2. While it is difficult to complain about the new fine amounts and changing from 3 strikes to 2 strikes if I am presenting myself as a good host that will screen my guests, I disagree with the recommendations. The new fines are too high and I think the 3 strikes is working. It is possible to get complaints that are just from grumpy neighbors and guests can make mistakes. The fines are so excessive not to match the "crime". If you have someone who is a chronic problem the 3 strikes is there. 3 Notification of neighbors sections- I am not a fan. Reaching neighbors is not easy as so many are not in residence. This is burdensome and I don't think will add anything helpful and could create alarm and a watchdog attitude to invent problems. I prefer an all is well approach until it is not. 4 Any training workshops should be voluntary and not mandatory. 5. 45 minute response by local. I think this already exists but I will add that our local contacts are not on duty law enforcement officers. The 45 minutes is too short-they may be asleep, or not picking up their phones for a variety of reasons. On the positive side, I applaud any materials that can be used to educate guests. I post trash info etc on a bulletin and have a guest handbook but some do not read this. Guests want to do the right thing and usually their errors are just mistakes. Thank you for your consideration of my comments. Juliana Kimmel La Quinta. phone: CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JULIE KIMMEL STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:gretchen kneeter Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 5:59 PM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:Linda Evans; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; rradi@laquinta.gov Subject:KEEP THE MORATORIUM ON STVR THIS IS A WRITTEN COMMUNCATION TO THE CITH COUNCIL AND LINDA EVANS AS WELL AS THE CITY CLERKS OFFICE  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Hi I am Gretchen Kneeter I moved to La Quinta Cove in June in 2001.   I moved to the Cove due to the hiking trails and the pet/dog friendly environment plus the "neighborhood" feel the cove  had to offer PLUS THE BEAUTY OF THE COVE.  STVR's are destroying my neighborhood ‐ making them not safe‐ robberies ‐ violence ‐ loud music ‐ endless parties ‐  fireworks ‐ parking issues ‐ trash issues ‐ the list goes on and on and on.....  This activism against STVRs is not just limited to the City of La Quinta  but is now valley wide and gaining momentum  everyday.  Activism STARTS with Lack of Leadership.  When people's voices are not heard  or brushed off   Linda Evans Quote   "When we here my neighborhood is changing ....we had a great neighborhood....all the kids played together and now  they are rentals "  " well then why aren't u mad at the person who sold their house and left such a great community"  MY  Take that is .....Not my Fault all this things are going on......Be mad at the neighbors they are the bad guys..... not  me....I'm awesome ‐  Love u guys ‐ Change is great  ‐  so what more robberies  ‐ so what more more noise and fireworks  yea their illegal but who really cares.... its about money  Trash and parking problems and gun shots at STVR parties ‐ ITS  A BUMP IN THE ROAD   ‐ we will work through this.....  This  is great for the city....... you old time residents just need to sell       so the whole town can become awesome again  with out all the old time cry babies  La Quinta will make millions  Linda Evans Quote   "When we here my neighborhood is changing ....we had a great neighborhood....all the kids played together and now  they are rentals "  " well then why aren't u mad at the person who sold their house and left such a great community"  They LEFT BECAUSE OF STVR  LEADERSHIP ‐  LACK OF FORESIGHT AND A BIGGER VISION FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA IS THE PROBLEM  ‐ YOU LEADERSHIP FOLKS  NEED TO STOP ALL  STVR RENTALS  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT GRETCHEN KNEETER STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 THE FOUCUS NEEDS TO CHANGE ‐ TO A SUSTAINBLE FUTURE WITH FOCOUS ON:  THE EMPTY STORES  AND OFFICES BRING BUSINESS AND REAL REVENUE TO LA QUINTA....  SO YOU CAN RID THIS CITY OF STVR    YOU ARE ALL DELUSIONAL THAT STVR CAN SUSTAIN THE CITY.    I am kind of Lucky at this point we only have 3 "Official" STVRs around my street area  but that is not counting neighbors  who aren't listed as STVR folks who rent them out  AT EVERY EVENT AND PAY NOTHING‐‐‐‐ with 0 financial gain for the  city of La Quinta.   JUST  MONEY IN THE OWWERS POCKETS WITH NOT ONE CENT GOING TO THE CITY  ‐ BUT ALL WITH THE STVR PROBLES  AND SINCE THE CITY HAS NO CLUE........HOW WIDE SPREAD THIS IS AS WELL    I WANT NO STVRS IN THE COVE    THEY ONLY REASON STVRS EXIST IS COACHELLA ‐ BNP ‐ STAGECOACH  BUT THEY WILL ALSO WILL CHANGE AND POSSIGO AWAY AFTER COVID  NEED TO PLAN FOR THE FUTURE BECAUSE ALL  THAT IS THE PAST    MY NAME IS GRETCHEN KNEETER  MY ADDRESS IS   LA QUINTA CA 92253 CELL #   I MOVED HERE IN 2001  THIS IS A PUBLIC COMMENT TO THE STVR PROBLEM IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA CA 92253  THIS IS A WRITTEN COMMUNICATION FOR THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 15 2020    CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT GRETCHEN KNEETER STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS From: Brent Lamb    Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 8:06 AM  To: Lori Lorett <llorett@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Taylor Lamb   Subject: Written Public Comments for La Quinta's STR Program     EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution  when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.     Lori,      I would like to submit written comments in favor of La Quinta's STR Program. Can you confirm  receipt when you have a chance? Here is the requested info, per the website:    1) Full Name: Brent Lamb  2) City of Residence: La Quinta  3) Phone Number:   4) Public Comment   5) Subject: Written Public Comments in Favor of La Quinta's STR Program  6) Written Comments: "My wife and I rely on the income we receive in renting out our house to short term renters to support our family, especially since I recently lost my job due to covid layoffs. We understand that there are some issues with some STR permit holders, but the minority of STR holders who are causing issues should not jeopardize the STR program for the majority of folks who are respectful and abide by the rules. We ask that you please consider this, as well as the the impact that not allowing STRs will have on our La Quinta community, such as the further impact to small businesses, and devastating loss of tax revenue that our schools rely on, our police and fire departments, city workforce, infrastructure, jails, parks, and countless other public and municipal services and resources that our hard working residents rely on.     We support more stringent rules for STRs to alleviate the issues caused by the rise in vacation rentals from the pandemic. However, the pandemic will come to an end and the rate of vacation rentals will normalize, but the decisions that are made by this committee will have a lasting impact on our community and the people that rely on short term rental income. Let's work together to solve these issues with calm and respectful reasoning.     Thank you for your consideration."       CITY COUNCIL MEETING – DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT BRENT LAMB STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Yenifer Lopez Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 3:23 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Advocating for short term rentals to remain open during COVID-19 ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Hello, I work within the PGA West community cleaning properties. I ask that you please allow the rentals to continue operating because I greatly depend on these incomes. Closing down the rentals would mean that I would lose over $2,500 monthly. Please help support the community. Unfortunately, I have an appointment at 4pm and won’t be near my phone but will be available any other time. My number is should you have any further questions. Thank you, Yenifer CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY YENIFER LOPEZ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Carol MALDONADO Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 7:55 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Fwd: Written Comments: STVR’s  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Sent from my iPad  Begin forwarded message:  From: Carol Maldonado   Subject: Fwd: Written Comments:  STVR’s  Sent from my iPhone  Subject: Written Comments:  STVR’s  Counsel Members of LaQuinta,   I have been an STVR Airbnb host since it’s inception here in the City of La Quinta!  I do not own a rental,   I rent out rooms in MY house where I reside.  I provide this service during the music festivities of Coachella and stagecoach, and  sometimes tennis and golf and an occasional wedding!  I have hosted the most wonderful people over the years, I have never had a problem  with any of them. They have all been respectful and courteous and because of them I  have been an ongoing Superhost on Airbnb in this city that I ᤻᤹᤺ love for many years!  It would be a shame for STVR’s to be discontinued because of the fault of a few multiple  home rental owners that do not abide by the laws!  Airbnb has also provided me with extra income, and as Senior citizens this income has  been very helpful to my husband and I and it allows us to afford to live here in this  beautiful Gem of the Desert City.  Please be considerate of those of us that abide by the rules!  Thank you,  Carol and Joe Maldonado     Sent from my iPhone  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT CAROL MALDONADO STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Kevin Miles Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 1:32 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:STVR Written Comments Attachments:STVR Written Comments_pt2.pdf  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   1)Full Name: Kevin J. Miles 2)City of Residence: La Quinta, CA 3)Phone Number:  4)Public Comment: Opposition of current STVR Policy 5)Subject: Uncontrollable Full‐time STVRs 6)Written Comments: Current STVR Policies allow for issues to persist with neighboring residents The current STVR Policy set forth by the City of La Quinta is starting to show some issues. It is understandable  the desire the City holds to have a permitting process and be friendly towards this market. The revenue that the city is  making from permitting, penalties, and the tax from these STVRs is surely attractive to officials to manage a budget.  However, this is coming at the expense of its residents who see very little, if at all any, benefit from living next door to a  full‐time STVR.   It has been stated and documented that many, not all, of these STVRs are causing issues with its neighboring  residents. The safety concerns of speeding within neighborhoods, excessive partying, houses being transformed into  holding an absurd number of guests, and other issues are making family‐oriented areas unsuitable for their residents.  Areas within the city like the Cove and North La Quinta are seeing extremely high numbers of full time STVRs. This is due  to them not being attributed to a current HOA. Note, these areas within the city are the areas that hold the most full‐ time and working‐class residents. I live in an area that is walking distance to an elementary school, middle school, the  high school, and La Quinta Park. My wife and I purchased the home, prior to the City’s code restructuring, knowing that  we would want to be in a family centric neighborhood. At that time, La Quinta was well known in the area to have great  public schools and we weighed that heavily in the decision to purchase our home. Currently, over sixty percent of the  time when a house in our neighborhood goes up for sale it is purchased with the sole intention of becoming a full‐time  STVR.   The current City Policy regarding STVRs does very little to protect the values of our neighborhoods. It is well  known that La Quinta is a destination place for those who are looking to get out of the LA area for the weekend. Also, it  is desirable due to its proximity to the various events within the Coachella Valley. With no restrictions to the number of  permits allowed for full‐time STVRs the trend is only going to continue until the market is supersaturated. This is going to discourage current residents and future residents from living in La Quinta. When current residents get fed up, we will  see the ones who can afford to go elsewhere, move. Leaving the less fortunate behind and eliminating the diversity our  community currently holds.   The current policy does not restrict the owner’s from modifying or packing their homes with tenants. There is a  home in North La Quinta that was transformed from a 4‐bedroom home into an 8‐bedroom home to house 16 adults.  This house packing easily leads to excessive partying and noise. Also, due to the number of adults it can hold it entices  young adults into renting the home out and splitting the cost.  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT KEVIN MILES STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 I have seen firsthand the time it takes for Code Enforcement to follow up on a complaint. I have called upwards  of 3 times in one night due to the loud music keeping me, my wife, and our infant up. The current penalties that the city  has for violations is laughable. They don’t even make an owner sweat when they can make up the amount in one  weekend worth of renting. Also, due to the weak violations, some owner’s aren’t enticed to screen who they rent their  homes out to and when. It is well known that when using Airbnb and VRBO, owners can review the potential renter  before agreeing to rent to the individual. I have a friend who operates a STVR in La Quinta, that only rents to families  and doesn’t rent out during the festivals because they don’t want to be a nuisance to the neighbors.   If the city chooses to continue to allow STVRs to operate within La Quinta, then the policy needs to be amended  to protect the residents. A cap on permits needs to be made, the amount of individuals allowed in a home needs to be  limited, and the violation amounts need to be increased to an amount that actually entices the owners to better screen  their tenants. Also, the city should require STVRs to visibly display their permit like they require contractors to do when  working on a project.  In closing, it is shameful for an elected official to pass blame to former residents for selling their homes and to  dismiss the concerns of their constituents as exaggerating. An elected official can handle themselves in a more  professional manner and not embarrass their citizens to the media. Even if this official has no intention to run for  reelection, they should always uphold themselves in an ethical manner that reflects well on the City of La Quinta.  Respectfully,  Kevin Miles  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT KEVIN MILES STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From: Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:58 PM To:Monika Radeva Subject:STVR / Ad,-Hoc recommendations/ Written Comments  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   To the City of LaQuinta Mayor and City Council, I am writing you today about my STVR at the south end of the cove (upper cove) area in LaQuinta. I have been an AirBnB super host with a 5 star rating across the board with my vacation rental for last two quarters. Many people that are looking for a place will use this filter distinction as part of their search to insure an excellent experience. Even with the pandemic in place, I offered my home to first responders from out of the area as well as local medical professionals that needed a place to rest and yet keep their families safe from possible exposure to the virus. My home's review have been nothing less than stellar by my guests- which is exactly how I intended it to be. I wanted to create an experience that would give me an opportunity to CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT LARRY MOAD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 share my talent for hospitality with folks from outside of the area. My home has NEVER been an instant book- although the recommendation from AirBnB is to make it that way....it gives the guest an instant answer and makes more for the owner. But that was not my focus- I felt I needed to still know something about them before I allowed them the opportunity to stay.at my home. I had an inquiry from a young woman that told me that she was a nurse...with a birthday coming up. She and 4 of her colleagues wanted to come stay at the home just for a break from the Covid-19....over the 4th of july weekend. Her responses were in full sentences and she was quick to respond.. Her profile showed that she had been part of the AirBnB guest list since 2017 (photos are available for the host to view if uploaded AFTER the booking has been accepted). There were no reviews on previous stays (hosts are encouraged but not required to offer them). I always look for that first- and if it’s there, read and assess the potential guest before I accept their request to book with me. If it’s not there, I would ask open ended questions about their group to try to find out more from them. All exchanges were through the AirBnB platform- I do not speak with them or text them on their phones. In this way, I have one single location to go to for all communications- and AirBnB is also able to monitor if needed. Her responses were timely, written well, and I accepted. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT LARRY MOAD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 3 Turns out she was not living in her truth, and lied to me. The violation occurred and that’s what brings us to today. When I called her on it through the messaging platform there was no response. I wrote a review that was less than stellar of her misuse of my home and published it- it is still there as of this writing for any other host to see. She misrepresented herself and the intentions of her party that weekend and has since cost me thousands. Due to the city’s suspension on my first offense, I had to pay double the (original) fine of $500, had to close my doors and lost all 4 weekends in August, also the 3 days in September for Labor Day. Based on the pricing I showed for the house for those rented dates, I lost over $9,000 in revenue for those 3 months- used to pay my mortgage, utilities and other associated things needed for running the house. After paying an additional $250, I appealed the decision to suspend with the City. After appx 30 days after the offense, I was allowed to reopen, but I was on probation thru the end of October. I appealed my citation also- hoping to find some financial forgiveness for the $1,000 assesment of the inappropriate actions of the guest. Wasted time....for me and those that were in attendance. You already had my money- and really had CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT LARRY MOAD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 4 no intention of give any portion of it back. You just made me wait another 30 days for me to find out. My 'First Time Offense' cost me over $6,000.00. It cost ME....not the LIAR that took advantage of my home. I am current with the TOT (Transient Occupancy Tax)- thankful that I have this first-hand opportunity to help people make special memories, create a revenue stream for myself, and add to the coffers of the city for future projects. Since then, in the disclosure/ safety section of my AirBnB profile, it shows a ring camera at the exterior/ front of the house, and now one/ exterior over the pool common area. The second camera has already stopped two inquires to book- and that’s fine with me. Each guest must agree to the house rules- stating that they understand the noise ordinance and number of people allowed at the house. I have employed a security company to respond to any noise complaints at the house, with direction to evict anyone that violates the CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT LARRY MOAD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 5 house rules. They know where the circuit breakers are at to kill the power and get them out of the house. The City's two different levels of accountability for noise is not fair. STVR owners are fined, not the guest. The guest should also be ticketed. The Ad-Hoc group was very lop-sided in its reputation of business in the city- most people were anti- STVR's. Not ONE of the suggestions sent to the city council by the Ad- Hoc group was unanimous, suggesting that the intent of the leadership of the group was eliminate the STVR's altogether. More than once, comparable data was taken from Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert...where they don't allow them. Any action to block or eliminate will keep people from wanting to purchase here- just ask the realtors on the ad-hoc. One month, one of them lost 4 different sales because of your moratorium. You are killing the lifeline to city revenue. Go after the low hanging fruit. Cut off the power and water to the houses without permits or have excessive complaints. Put a lien on their property for non payments. But please stop hurting us that are doing our best to make life better for ourselves and our families. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT LARRY MOAD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 6 Larry Moad PS- And on another note- the city's chopping up of major streets with one speed limits for 3 blocks, then another for the next 5, then another for the next....is just rediculous. You have managed to create pockets of speed traps that leave a bad taste in the mouths of those visiting as well as the locals. You really need to rethink that mess. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT LARRY MOAD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Mandi Moran Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 10:14 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments Attachments:STVR.pdf  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   William & Amanda Moran         Agenda Item: Study Session Item #1  Support for Short Term Vacation Rentals  We would like to voice our support for Short Term Vacation Rentals in the city. We own two STVR properties within La Quinta: & .  Just as we did our due-diligence when purchasing our homes in a community that allows for STVRs (PGA West), that opportunity was also afforded to those who own homes there, to not purchase within those communities. There are dozens of communities within La Quinta that do not allow STVRs.  We believe in being a good neighbor(I've offered my personal cell to every surrounding neighbor), clearly communicating the rules to guests, screening our guests(including social media profiles & phone interviews). We personally manage our homes(24/7) in order to effectively prevent & mitigate any problems.  I have attached a graphic here, that represents what many of us, as responsible owners of STVRs, believe offers real solutions to some of the purported problems. While there will always be bad apples(on both sides), we truly hope to find a resolution that is fair & equitable for all parties involved, not punitive to responsible homeowners.  ‐‐   Amanda Moran    CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MANDI MORAN STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MANDI MORAN STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Judith Neid Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 7:10 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Fwd: The Cove and STVRS  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Judith Neid   Date: Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 6:40 PM  Subject: The Cove and STVRS  To: <cityclerk@laquinta.gov>  Cc: <jmmcmillen@laquinta.gov>, <levens@laquinta.gov>, <jlevens@laquinta.gov>, <kfitzpatrick@laquinta.gov>,  <rradi@laquinta.gov>, <ssanchez@laquinta.gov>  You may or may not realize it but your STVR policy in the Cove has already made it unaffordable. Properties coming on the market are being sold for 50,000 over asking by the investment groups you have embraced. Rentals are gone the minute they come on the market. Who lives in the Cove? It is your workforce. Teachers, firemmen, policemen, small business owners, mid management people, plumbers, pool service companies, landscape contractors etc. The Coachella Valley is growing. Most of these people want what every American family works for. A home to raise their families. It is as American as apple pie. They will migrate to new areas with jobs and affordable housing. Restaurants will be directly affected. Resorts who need mid management as well. You have not done your long term planning very well. Go back to the drawing board if it is not too late. Respectfully Judith Neid La Quinta CA 92253 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JUDITH NEID STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:MARDE OLSON Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 8:38 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written comments for 12/15 board meeting-Please help stop the proliferation of STVR’s in our neighborhoods... ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Please include this letter in public record for support of efforts to deal with proliferation of STVR’s in La Quinta and  resulting loss of privacy/quiet enjoyment of our neighborhoods.  Thank you.  Marde Olson            La Quinta              >  >   >> Dear council‐thank you for the great work you continue to do on behalf of our wonderful city.  We have lived here  full‐time for 6 years, and enjoyed numerous visits for 25+ years both to visit my parents who lived in La Quinta for many  years,  and had our own rental for 7 years at PGA West before we purchased 6 years ago.  >>> We’d like to reiterate comments from previous correspondence as we head into “crunch time” for La Quinta to join  other desert cities in the effort to stop the degradation of our residential neighborhoods due to the proliferation of  STVR’s.  >>>> In all those years of renting (and during the first 4 years of our full‐time residence here), we have not had any issue  with STVR’s as numbers were always low enough to be manageable in terms of policing, and the summer heat  prevented any large amount of activity during the “off season”.  However, in the last few years we’ve seen a HUGE  proliferation of STVR’s, of course only magnified with COVID as so many adults can work from home and children are  schooling online.  >>>> Due to this exponential increase in numbers we’ve seen a drastic reduction in the ability to enforce privacy/quiet  enjoyment rules in place in our community.  By the time a rule regarding quiet or illegal use of private property (just a  few of the infringements that are occurring regularly) can attempt to be enforced, renters are gone, only to be replaced  by the next batch.  >>>> We are begging you to take action like other desert cities are to stop the out‐of‐control increase in short‐term  rentals by making the moratorium against any new STVR licenses permanent.  We also ask you to continue working on  effective enforcement of rules in place for those already licensed.  Our current numbers are beyond the capacity of the  city to enforce, and residential areas should not have been allowed to become transient hotel zones.  Rentals of longer  than 28 days are good for our local businesses, as those renters are committed to being part of a community rather than  just “dropping in” for a few days to take advantage of our beautiful environment, and provide good revenue for the city  in terms of permit income that doesn’t require excess expenses to police.  We know you’ll take the right action to keep  La Quinta the “Jewel of the Desert” as it’s always been.  >>>> Thank you for your efforts.  Marde and Mark Olson  >  > Sent from my iPad  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARDE OLSON STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Jennifer Porter Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 12:31 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written comments Importance:High  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Jennifer Porter  La Quinta Cove    Public comment   In support of STVR with increased enforcement. Grandfather all existing STVRs.  To the La Quinta City Mayor, City County and other City officials present:  You don’t need to be a full time resident to have pride of ownership and respect for your neighbors and community.  I  own a second home that I share as a vacation rental to help with the cost while my family and I can enjoy the property  often throughout the year.   I love La Quinta, the Cove, Old town La Quinta and feel very fortunate that I discovered the area.  I DON’T fit the greedy investor, don’t care about neighbors or the community, just trying to make money narrative that  the anti‐STVR describe and I represent a good portion of the STVR community. While you consider making changes to  the program…I hope that you will grandfather all existing STVRs to remain operational now and into the future. I  understand putting a CAP in place as many cities strive to keep homes available for LTR and for first time home buyers,  but I hope you will honor those who have already made the choice to purchase in the area and not create a hardship for  many of us.  The 2 main problems that need to be addressed are violations (trash and noise) and density control. The first continues  to get better with the new restrictions and fines.  The party houses will be weeded out as the city continues with  increased enforcement. Problem solved. Also, I believe all STVRs should be required to enroll in walk up garbage service‐ trash problem solved. The density issue is going to take more thoughtful consideration and the city will have to  determine the mix that it wants to see in the community. But please don’t phase out STVR and please don’t entertain  the 300 ft radius.  Grandfather responsible existing STVRs in the program and implement density decisions going  forward but not to impact current STVR owners.  I have been a vacation home renter my whole life…way before the Airbnb craze.  For work travel I prefer hotels but for  longer leisure travel I have always preferred the vacation home alternative.  The current Covid climate has made stand  alone vacation homes preferred by many and I believe that trend will continue for a long while. This is a great alternative  for visitors to the Coachella Valley/La Quinta.  Most of my visitors are families and couples who come for a relaxing get  away and enjoy all that the area offers. My goal is to have responsible, quiet, respectable guest for the sake of the  neighborhood and community…and for the sake of my cherished second home. Please keep the STVR alternative alive  for our visitors and home owners who are responsible and invested in our beautiful city.  Sincerely,  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JENNIFER PORTER STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2   Jennifer Porter  LQ Cove Prideful Property Owner  CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not authorized to intercept, read,  print, retain, copy, forward, or disseminate this communication. This communication may contain information that is  proprietary, attorney/client privileged, attorney work product, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If  you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone or by return e‐mail, and  destroy all copies of this message, electronic, paper, or otherwise.  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JENNIFER PORTER STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Janice Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 12:15 PM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:; Subject:Please have this email be recorded into information for the Dec. 15 Council meeting  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   To the City of La Quinta, As you consider, once again, the dilemma regarding short term vacation rentals, let us state our beliefs as strongly against STVRs. We have lived and paid taxes in La Quinta for almost 20 years. We bought in a residentially zoned neighborhood which has inexplicitly been transformed to a commercial community due to oversights by all our elected officials. The adjacent, large STVR adjacent to our home has been a constant cause of grief and dismay for 15 months. Noise, disrespect, dogs, high rate of turnover and trespassing occur weekly. We complain weekly. Warnings and citations are delivered, but it happens again, and again and again. Life has become a complete disappointment living in our dream home. The only recourse is to eliminate STVRs from residential zoned neighborhoods. STVRs are NOT residential. They are permitted, advertise their services, charge money and fees. That is not residential. Huge IPO's adorn these companies. They advertise on television. Residential????? Even while the state mandates that only non essential workers may stay at hotels, we are confronted with party-goers next door due to your refusal to address the issues. It is a commercial enterprise that is not a residential home. This is not right, nor is if fair. You are directly responsible for endangering our health and well being. Untruths and exaggerations told to you by large businesses who purchase STVR properties with the sole purpose to make money are inaccurate. We live with the horror of these renters and we are not exaggerating. It is truly awful. Please, please come to the aid of your residential community as fast as possible. Janice Pratte and Larry Leong CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS JANNICE PRATTE & LARRY LEONG STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Stefanie Segal Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 11:33 AM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:Jim Lambert Subject:Short Term Rentals at PGA West-WRITTEN COMMENTS ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Unfortunately I am unable to attend today’s meeting or I would definitely voice my concerns in person.  There are at least 4 rental houses in my neighborhood and I have “the known party house” next door.  There has been a  constant flow of turnover renters scheduled for this house allowing for newcomers about every two or three days.  My  husband and I were subject to these activities, lights, music, yelling and female screams most of this past summer (day &  night).  We finally fled to our Northern home in mid‐August.  Our neighborhood streets have been lined with cars that do not fit on the small driveways.  Our  golf course was closed  for part of the summer so it became a playground for adults, children and dogs.  I suggested to the owner’s  mother that  there was a penalty for running and playing on the golf course and her answer was‐“my son has a lot of money so we  don’t care”.  We have turned them in to the authorities  FOUR or FIVE times.  This house is known to the powers that be at PGA West,  all our friends and the neighborhood.  Unfortunately we are not alone in this terrible situation.  Yet,  the people who  own these homes, do not live here! They say they are helping to sell homes in our community and bringing newcomers  and money to be spent here.  They are telling anyone who is foolish enough to listen that they LOVE LA QUINTA.  These very same people have DESTROYED my property value.  They would be fools to live on my block and they don’t!   Everyone knows about PGA West and what is going on here.  I suggest if these property owners want to prove they really care about what’s going on with the rentals they not only  give us their list of proposals but since they LOVE LA QUINTA so much they move here for at least awhile and see what is  really going on!!  Stefanie Segal  La Quinta  PGA West    Sent from my iPad  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT STEFANIE SEGAL STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:John Seoane Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 7:12 PM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:evans@laquintaca.gov; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Robert Radi; Steve Sanchez; Jenn Wife Subject:Written Comments support for STVR Attachments:STVR.pdf  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   John & Jennifer Seoane    La Quinta, Ca 92553  Agenda Item: Study Session Item #1  Support for Short Term Vacation Rentals  We would like to voice our support for Short Term Vacation Rentals in the city. We own a STVR properties within La Quinta:   Just as we did our due-diligence when purchasing our homes in a community that allows for STVRs (PGA West), that opportunity was also afforded to those who own homes there, to not purchase within those communities. There are dozens of communities within La Quinta that do not allow STVRs.  We believe in being a good neighbor by clearly communicating the rules to guests, posting all the rules and regulations on VRBO and our welcome book and check in instructions. We personally manage our home (24/7) in order to effectively prevent & mitigate any problems.  I have attached a graphic here, that represents what many of us, as responsible owners of STVRs, believe offers real solutions to some of the purported problems. While there will always be bad apples(on both sides), we truly hope to find a resolution that is fair & equitable for all parties involved, not punitive to responsible homeowners.   This property affords our family the ability to have a place to stay while visiting family in the area and also plan for our future retirement within the community. Without the ability to rent out our home while we are not using it that would not be possible. We also employ house keepers, landscaper, pool cleaning service, pest control handy man and contractors. In addition to employing these various trades our guest spend money within the local community to increase sales tax revenue and continue to support the local community. Without that additional support to the local community the City of La Quinta and local businesses will suffer as the desert can support itself without tourism and visitors coming to the desert.   Regards,  John Seoane‐SIOR  Senior Vice President/Principal  Lee & Associates | Ontario  D 909.373.2946  O 909.989.7771  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOHN SEOANE STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 F 909.373.2951  C 562.547.8021  jseoane@lee‐assoc.com   ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  Corporate ID 00976995 l DRE #01453455  3535 Inland Empire Boulevard  Ontario, California 91764  ImageImageImageImage   Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic e‐mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is  intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential. If any reader of this communication is not  the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have  received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e‐mail, and delete the original  message and all copies from your system. Thank you.  Please excuse type errors when sending from my cell phone.  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOHN SEOANE STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Bob Stoddard Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 10:55 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments - STVRs - 12/15/20 La Quinta City Council  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Bob & Cindy Stoddard La Quinta, CA Public Comment STVR Written Comment We have lived in La Quinta, since 2003, and chose this city, particularly North La Quinta for its quiet, friendly and family atmosphere, which we have enjoyed immensely except for the current state we presently find ourselves in, which is the over saturation of STVRs in our surrounding neighborhood and area. We respectfully request that the City Council does not consider lifting the moratorium on new STVR licenses, until at such a time the City has allowed the following to occur: 1) The City to develop and make available for public review, a density map identifying all STVRs in the City of La Quinta. 2) The City to provide for a public forum whereby the residents have the opportunity to question and state any and all concerns to both City Council and staff. Sincerely, Bob & Cindy Stoddard CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS BOB & CINDY STODDARD STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Marie Thompson Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 8:25 AM To:City Clerk Mail; Jon McMillen; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Steve Sanchez Subject:Written comment STVR  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Marie Thompson   LaQuinta resident    STVR moratorium and density   Dear Mayor, City Manager and City Council,  As a resident of the La Quinta Cove I am very concerned about the explosive growth of the designated short term rental  homes in the Cove. As one of the first developments in La Quinta it was quickly sub‐divided into residential lots where  the average size is 50ft of frontage and approximately 100 ft deep. A quick trip to Google maps shows roof lines with  often less than ten feet between homes. Over time the number of full time residents, either owning or renting has  grown and created a place where teachers, police, trades people can afford to live.   The beautiful La Quinta Resort, Legacy Villas, Embassy Suites offer a variety of hotel and condominium spaces in close  proximity of the Cove and its many hiking trails that offer spectacular views of our mountains. Some gated communities  have promoted their properties as time shares or available for short term renting. In general, these types of properties  have shared facilities, like swimming pools, tennis courts and even golf courses. They have property management rules,  operating procedures and regulations as well as onsite security. They were planned to support short term rental  activities and behaviors.  By allowing residential homes to be used as ad hoc hotel suites we have created a number of continuing instances that  greatly disturb and disrupt the general peace and well being of our special neighborhood. The Cove residents either  endure these varying levels of unpleasant neighborhood invasions or they take the time to report violations to Code  Enforcement, assigned to support the growing number of occurrences. With regular neighbors we have time to build  relationships and generally have consideration for those who live around us. Short Term Rentals can quickly set a  neighborhood on edge wondering what the surprise will be this week. The arrival of three, four and even five cars at one  location make it difficult to understand who belongs where. The idea of Neighborhood Watch becomes a joke.  With one STVR across the street we have had overflowing garbage put out days before garbage pick up, intoxicated  people sitting, diving off wall, loud music all day and into the night.  Being a resident who is familiar with a property is  very different from renting to a strange guest.  Unregulated and unsupervised hotel conversions seem to be recurring  problems that the city should not be trying to manage. We should be supporting the local Hotels and short term rentals  areas that are designed and set‐up to support a successful stay.   It is also clear that COVID has created it own set of problems. Because hotels are closely regulated and monitored, they  have been forced into punishing restrictions. People trying to escape confinement in their home area have turned  to  STVR’s as a less restrictive alternative that is not monitored as closely. This has caused an explosion of STVR booking  where we saw back to back rentals that turned over three times at the Thanksgiving holiday.   With STVR’s visibly on the increase (three dedicated on our block) we are also seeing an increase in home prices beyond  the normal rate. Speculators think that this is a good situation, but recent history shows that a boom can quickly turn  into a crash, especially when COVID allows vacationers to again expand their travels and we find that the Hot Summer  Rentals disappear. If STVR’s Business Owners don’t have their expected bookings they lower rental prices (hurting the  Hotels) and they eventually start selling or forfeiting on their property which ends up depressing the neighborhood with  vacant, difficult to sell homes. This has created inflated prices for both new home buyers and long term renters.   CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARIE THOMPSON STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 2 The Cove works best as the beautiful, residential neighborhood that it was designed to be and we need the Citys help to  keep it strong and safe.  I would ask that you keep the moratorium in place indefinitely, implementation of 300 ft  density, keep the noise amendment of 8:00 pm‐ 8:00 am, no amplified music. Let’s try that and see if that helps control  this monster of STVR growth.      Sincerely,  Marie L. Thompson    La Quinta Homeowner    ‐‐   Marie Thompson  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARIE THOMPSON STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Vacation Rental Owners and Neighbors of La Quinta <info@vronlq.org> Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 3:04 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Public Written Comments for the City Council meeting on 12/15/20 Attachments:Summary_Perspective_on_STVRs_-_VRON-LQ_We_Luv_La_Quinta.pdf ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Good afternoon, VRON La Quinta and We Luv La Quinta organizations reviewed the ad-hoc recommendation report line-by-line and have come up with a brief synopsis of our top recommendations and oppositions which we hope you will take into consideration. Please see attached document, there are many things in the ad-hoc report that we agree with as we feel this will strengthen the STVR program and some which we do not agree with or feel there is not enough information at this point to support a change. We wanted to provide this to you ahead of the city council meeting tomorrow so that if you can please let us know if have any questions or suggestions for us. Our groups are aligned in our beliefs and want to partner with the city to help strengthen the La Quinta STVR program into the best in the Coachella Valley. Thank you for your time and consideration. VRON-LQ & We Luv La Quinta Officers, Directors & Members https://u19135455.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=nKWFMpSw6lqQ5whYj9t9rY0eOdbzHmuinIc8- 2Bg1bphWyDeAxRwsHYO1IJHGuOj33t65V_UjpKQlOa4L81cZxIXsUF8UGFYQJEau1FG2UWSsGs- 2BV3ItAzl0EXnzND- 2BwwZ96VS1IncHrZ4FtmQ1suqQ0iFJtAhIYsTZMGHdXjhGisMqj9rMcHJkdaQAJwe8E83sNEGwvcIIo Qdy6NiJUZQDSR0yABaasz90Z8dlONW3FqKg4dlSPrl9qm9zvHsZqDL4CIom0bbdV6G- 2FTVt2ADngW-2F6-2B0sJtIVDQL-2FoZmjxhYAReJUc-3D https://u19135455.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=OtAjtjdfK-2BHDBCf0-2BgPqKjBO- 2FHIFXeucNWHdfkaqtsd9yWXdlq58fG- 2FTsyNaoX4zSnPk_UjpKQlOa4L81cZxIXsUF8UGFYQJEau1FG2UWSsGs-2BV3ItAzl0EXnzND- 2BwwZ96VS1IncHrZ4FtmQ1suqQ0iFJtEfVuntjfsuUmzkfA-2FvunsnidsD3UB1ss7N598- 2FOjrKCW48RUGj0Cc-2BMqhUPHVFOLcrpSkrfR- 2Fq179sWJ34xWEfKq9Rmb55kbWI2yefYSAQdhCPppmK16A9EczIU2pxsPwXoowXLT5whdh1Z0zM aIOA-3D CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY VRON-LQ STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1 From:Rod Zolt Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:00 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:STR for today's agenda -- Public Comment Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged  EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.   Hello, I would like to voice my support for the City Council to approve STR in La QUINTA. I understand the complexity and pros and cons for STR's, however; with documented cleaning procedures (which I have), and at least 48 hours between guests, there should not be a problem. Thank you, Rodney Zolt PGA West La Quinta, Ca 92253 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RODNEY ZOLT STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - STVR PROGRAM AD-HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS December 3rd, 2020  Stephen Nieto    La Quinta, CA 92253    Dear Madam Mayor and Members of City Council,  I am writing to share my thoughts and to provide some context regarding my vote against allowing for taller  building heights (40ft) along image corridors for the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center – Amendment to Specific  Plan 2017‐0002. One of the requests from City Council was to shift buildings around on the site to create an  iconic corner at Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 because it’s an iconic gateway into the City. I agree with this  direction, however, I do not agree with applicant’s design solution presented at the last Planning Commission  meeting.   Jefferson and Avenue 50, an intersection already suffering from unwanted visual impact due to high voltage  power lines, is not suitable to accommodate 40ft tall architectural massing at the intersection. As proposed, the  two retail buildings are situated tightly pressed against the street corner, separated with a narrow corridor, and  40 ft tall walls leading into an open plaza area. For reference, the Pavilions building has an entry feature with the  roof height at 42ft. The buildings are positioned in such a way that presents its “rear” or “back of house” to the  public facing corner and appears to turn its back to the intersection. Additionally, there is a height issue with the  proximity of the residential properties immediately south of the Avenue 50.   I am not opposed to taller architectural massing along image corridors, however, there is a time and place for  this to occur and each development proposal must be looked at independently. There are other ways to design  “iconic” without having to build vertical. The proposed architectural solution does not compliment the character  and rhythm of the existing landscape treatments and massing along Jefferson and along Avenue 50. The entry  element at Mountain View County Club has a water feature, highly manicured ground‐scape, a grove of Date  Palms, and a wood trellis for vehicles to drive under. Palmila, located south of Avenue 50, incorporates a unique  staggered perimeter wall with nicely landscaped edges, stone retaining walls, and a water feature set back to  create entry drama. It is in my opinion a more suitable design for this iconic corner opportunity would benefit  from more high‐quality landscape treatments, public art, and a larger plaza that pushes the massing away from  the corner.  Providing needed relief from the intersection, allowing the opportunity for an iconic landscape  statement and more “human scaled” architectural massing. An acceptable solution can be seen in the design  approach located at the commercial center on the SW corner of Cook Street and Gerald Ford. Here the massing  steps away from the intersection, utilizing an iconic landscape design, incorporating terraced architectural  forms, a widened breeze way lined with patio trellises, various shade elements, outdoor seating, and most  importantly a connection between the building face and street corner. This corner deserves much more then  what is currently being proposed, I would suggest that the applicant reconsider the opportunity for the  Jefferson/Avenue 50 corner.   Thank you so much for your time and consideration.   Sincerely,  Stephen T. Nieto  Planning Commissioner  CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY PLANNING COMMISSIONER NIETO PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER 1 From:Lori Sent:Thursday, December 3, 2020 12:21 PM To:Cheri Flores Subject:Pavilion Palms Shopping Center EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Cheri, Per your request, The design change requested by the Developer is to allow for taller building height along the Image Corridor in the area of the Pavilion Palm Shopping Center project to create an iconic corner at Avenue 50th & Jefferson streets. The two proposed building heights would reach 35-40 feet at their highest point. (sloping roofs) NOTE: 9.90.040 of La Quinta’s current Municipal Code; building height along Image Corridor is limited to 22 feet within 150 feet of the roadway. The proposed design requested by the Developer is not consistent with the General Plan; and further, the design change is in excess of the Image Corridor development specifications. The design change does not take into consideration the preservation of the San Jacinto & Santa Rosa Mountain views, nor does it seek to preserve the s urrounding residential neighborhood character. It also creates a walled 40 foot high alleyway between the two buildings. Question, why do we have Image Corridor areas when we appear to be frequently changing/raising the building height? These buildings would be better suited to the Grove Shopping Center in downtown L.A. Lastly, I am concerned, the proposed corner building heights appear to be out of scale with the primarily residential surrounding neighborhood community. The design scale of a neighborhood community depends on what people see, and how they experience the interrelationship between buildings, the city’s mountain views, public setting (public spaces, streets, sidewalks & Parks). These buildings are “over done”. For these reasons, I cannot recommend accepting this proposal. Ultimately, this proposal should be handled carefully and with determined deliberation. Loretta Currie CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 2020 - PUBLIC COMMENTS BY PLANNING COMMISSIONER CURRIE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER