The URL can be used to link to this page

2021 02 16 CouncilCITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 FEBRUARY 16,2021 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021 3:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION | 4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION ****************************** SPECIAL NOTICE Teleconferencing and Telephonic Accessibility In Effect Pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, N-33-20, N-35-20, and N-60- 20 executed by the Governor of California, in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.), members of the City Council, the City Manager, City Attorney, City Staff, and City Consultants may participate in this regular meeting by teleconference. Additionally, pursuant to the above-referenced executive orders, members of the public temporarily are not permitted to physically attend at City Hall the meeting to which this agenda applies, but any member of the public may listen or participate in the open session of this meeting as specified below. Members of the public wanting to listen to the open session of the meeting may do so by tuning-in live via http://laquinta.12milesout.com/video/live. Members of the public wanting to address the City Council during the open session, either for public comment or for a specific agenda item, or both, are requested to send an email notification to the La Quinta City Clerk’s Office at CityClerkMail@LaQuintaCA.gov, and specify the following information: 1) Full Name 4) Public Comment or Agenda Item Number 2)City of Residence 5) Subject 3) Phone Number 6) Written or Telephonic Verbal Comments City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City’s web page: www.LaQuintaCA.gov CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 FEBRUARY 16, 2021 The email “subject line” must clearly state “Written Comments” or “Telephonic Verbal Comments.” Telephonic verbal public comments – requests to speak must be emailed to the City Clerk no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and general public for the item(s) by contacting him/her via phone and queuing him/her to speak. Only one person at a time may speak by telephone and only after being recognized by the Mayor. Written public comments must be received by the City Clerk’s Office no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City Council, incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk’s Office can accommodate such request. It would be appreciated that any email communications for public comments related to the items on the agenda, or for general public comment, are provided to the City Clerk’s Office at the email address listed above prior to the commencement of the meeting. If that is not possible, and to accommodate public comments on items that may be added to the agenda after its initial posting or items that are on the agenda, every effort will be made to attempt to review emails received by the City Clerk’s Office during the course of the meeting. The Mayor will endeavor to take a brief pause before action is taken on any agenda item to allow the City Clerk to review emails and share any public comments received during the meeting. All emails received by the City Clerk, at the email address above, until the adjournment of the meeting, will be included within the public record relating to the meeting. ****************************** CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda by emailing written public comments or requests to provide verbal telephonic public comments as indicated above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3 FEBRUARY 16, 2021 shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by Government Code § 54954.2(b). CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION 1. THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (a) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. CONSULTATION WITH: ALEXANDER JOHNSTON, SENIOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR; WILLIAM H. IHRKE, CITY ATTORNEY (Review Continued Need and Response to Proclaimed State and Local Emergencies Caused by COVID-19) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTIONS(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda by emailing written public comments or requests to provide verbal telephonic public comments as indicated above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by Government Code § 54954.2(b). ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - NONE CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES DATED FEBRUARY 2, 2021 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 FEBRUARY 16, 2021 2. ADJUST PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS AND AWARD CONTRACT TO UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING FOR THE CITYWIDE MISCELLANEOUS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2020-02 15 3. APPROVE AMENDMENTS NO. 1 TO AGREEMENTS FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH NV5, INC AND THE ALTUM GROUP FOR ON-CALL SURVEY SERVICES 21 4. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH SCOPE EVENTS LLC TO HOST THE LA QUINTA ART CELEBRATION FROM NOVEMBER 11 TO NOVEMBER 14, 2021 31 5. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO CONTRACT WITH JONES BROS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE SILVERROCK WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2014-13/141513 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A RETENTION BASIN 41 6. APPROVE PURCHASE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES VEHICLE 47 7. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JANUARY 29 AND FEBRUARY 5, 2021 59 8. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE FEDERAL AWARDS REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 73 BUSINESS SESSION PAGE 1. APPROVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CITYWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM IN LA QUINTA 89 2. APPROPRIATE FUNDING AND AWARD CONTRACT TO CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITYWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM PROJECT NO. 2020-03 99 3. APPROVE PRELIMINARY DESIGN OPTION AND APPROPRIATE MEASURE G RESERVE FUNDING FOR THE SILVERROCK RETENTION BASIN SOIL STABILIZATION PROJECT 2020-07 105 4. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 MID-YEAR BUDGET REPORT, APPROVE THE RECOMMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS, AND DESIGNATE RESERVE FUNDING ALLOCATIONS 113 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 FEBRUARY 16,2021 STUDY SESSION PAGE 1. DISCUSS PROPOSED 2021-2026 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 131 PUBLIC HEARINGS – after 5:00 p.m. For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed “Request to Speak” form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or speak via teleconference in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. PAGE 1.231 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY RESOURCES 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC WORKS – QUARTERLY DEPARTMENT REPORT OCTOBER- DECEMBER 2020 469 MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT A SUBSEQUENT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2020-0001) AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0001, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2020-0001, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-001, AND VARIANCE 2020-0001 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 40-UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT PROJECT; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED A SUBSEQUENT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2020-0001; LOCATION; SOUTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND PALM CIRCLE DRIVE [RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-001 AND 2021-002] CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6 FEBRUARY 16, 2021 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 6. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 7. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 8. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Radi) 9. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (Fitzpatrick) 10 GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 11. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Radi) 12. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Peña) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 14. SILVERROCK EVENT SITE AD HOC COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 15. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Sanchez) 16. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Peña) 17. CVAG VALLEY-WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Peña) 18. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE (Peña) 19. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT – ENERGY CONSUMERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (Peña) 20. COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS EMERGENCY ECONOMIC RELIEF PROGRAM AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Radi) 21. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Radi) 22. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Radi) 23. CITYWIDE SECURITY CAMERAS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Radi) 24. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Radi & Sanchez) 25. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 26. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC WORKS POLICY COMMITTEE (Sanchez) 27. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 28. FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2020 475 29. FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES DATED DECEMBER 2, 2020 477 30. PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES DATED JANUARY 20, 2021 481 ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on March 2, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 7 FEBRUARY 16,2021 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk, of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City’s website, near the entrance to the Council Chambers at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at the Stater Brothers Supermarket at 78630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on February 12, 2021. DATED: February 12, 2021 MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777-7092, twenty- four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777- 7092. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the Councilmembers during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Community Development counter at City Hall located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. 8 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 6 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2021 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:30 p.m. by Mayor Evans. This meeting provided teleconferencing accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, N-33-20, N-35-20, and N-60-20 executed by the Governor of California, in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: City Manager McMillen, City Attorney Ihrke, City Clerk Radeva, Deputy City Clerk Romane, and Community Resources Manager Calderon PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA – None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA – Confirmed CLOSED SESSION 1. THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (a) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. CONSULTATION WITH: ALEXANDER JOHNSTON, SENIOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR; WILLIAM H. IHRKE, CITY ATTORNEY (Review Continued Need and Response to Proclaimed State and Local Emergencies Caused by COVID-19) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 6 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 3:32 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4:00 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihrke reported actions taken in Closed Session that require reporting pursuant to Government Code section 54950 et seq. (Brown Act). CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 1 – the City Council continued to discuss the threat to public services and closure of facilities caused by the threat of the spread of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the proclaimed local and statewide public health emergencies; continued discussion relating to the adopted COVID-19 Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Program; and took the following action: MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Sanchez to defer the repayment on loans that were made to 51 recipients under Rounds I and II of the COVID-19 Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Program as the initial recipients of the relief program to be extended through the end of calendar year 2021 (12/31/2021), and to instruct the City Manager and Staff to notify those recipients of this deferment. Motion passed unanimously. CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 2 –Council will recess back to Closed Session to consider this item, after the Open Session portion of the meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tem Radi led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS were provided by the citizens listed below in alphabetical order, which were distributed to Council, made publicly available, and incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting: Edward Armendarez, La Quinta – in opposition of Short-Term Vacation Rentals (STVR); and Sean McGrath, La Quinta – in support of STVRs. 10 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 6 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY: Richard (Dick) Mills, La Quinta – was not available to speak at this time due to technical difficulties. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING – ANNUAL COMMUNITY WORKSHOP MINUTES OF JANUARY 16, 2021 2. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JANUARY 7, 15, AND 22, 2021 3. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 2020 4. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 588 ON SECOND READING AMENDING SEVERAL SECTIONS OF TITLE 9 ZONING OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO STREAMLINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES AND STANDARDS; CEQA: EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B)(3) REVIEW FOR EXEMPTIONS – COMMON SENSE RULE; LOCATION: CITYWIDE [ORDINANCE NO. 588] 5. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE FIRE STATION 70 REVITALIZATION PROJECT NO. 2019-07 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF AVENUE 54 AND MADISON STREET 6. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH CLEARSOURCE FINANCIAL CONSULTING FOR SERVICES RELATED TO THE CITY’S USER AND REGULATORY MASTER FEE SCHEDULE AND FULL COST ALLOCATION PLAN UPDATES MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Peña to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended, with Item No. 4 adopting Ordinance No. 588. Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION 1.APPROVE SECOND ROUND COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 11 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 of 6 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 Community Resources Manager Calderon presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. Council discussed the importance of the program; this grant was awarded to the Riverside County Sheriff Explorer Post 503 in the past; appreciate the work that the officers and trainees put into the program; plans for in- person attendance proposed to be held during a summer session; and the specifications and use of the Explorer Academy Training Program. PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY: Damian Ruiz, Deputy of the Riverside County Sherriff’s Department - expressed his appreciation of the grant program and Council’s award of the grant; the number of cadets involved in the program currently and in the past; lack of involvement with the community and other difficulties due to COVID 19; and looking to improve recruitment as the state begins to re-open. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Sanchez to approve second round Community Services Grants for fiscal year 2020/21 to Riverside County Sheriff Explorer Post 503 in the amount of $5,000. Motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA – Continued PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY: Richard (Dick) Mills, La Quinta – thanked Staff, Council and the STVR Program Ad-Hoc Committee for their service, time, recommendations, and extensive discussion during the January 27, 2021 Special Council meeting; spoke about STVR issues should be concentrated on resident’s quality of life, City’s full cost recovery as well as leveraging compliance; discussions seem limited to regulating activities that are a nuisance and degrade our community; Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue is important to the City; expressed support of new rules and regulations even if it causes revenue to decline; and encouraged Council to respect the resident’s quality of life regardless of the effects to the financial consequences. Mayor Evans thanked Mr. Mills for his service on the Financial Advisory Commission; and spoke about his knowledge of the financial projections and impacts of the City; and his important role in this decision-making process. STUDY SESSION – None PUBLIC HEARINGS – None 12 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 of 6 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS All reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS Mayor Evans met with two boy scout troops for their camp weekend in order to earn their citizenship badge which involved learning about the roles of the Mayor and Councilmembers. Mayor Pro Tem Radi reported out on his and Councilmember Peña’s attendance at a meeting with La Quinta High School Goldfish Project students who were awarded a grant to proceed with a project called “The Humans of LQHS” to promote empathy and make connections with students and faculty members. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS La Quinta’s representative for 2020, Mayor Evans reported on her participation in the following organizations’ meetings: GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE La Quinta’s representative for 2020, Councilmember Fitzpatrick reported on her participation in the following organizations’ meetings: COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE - on behalf of Mayor Pro Tem Radi La Quinta’s representative for 2020, Councilmember Peña reported on his participation in the following organization’s meeting: IID ENERGY CONSUMERS’ ADVISORY COMMITTEE La Quinta’s representative for 2020, Councilmember Radi reported on his participation in the following organization’s meeting: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 4:32 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AT 5:19 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT 13 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 of 6 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihkre reported no actions were taken on Closed Session Item No. 2 that require reporting pursuant to Government Code section 54950 et. seq. (Brown Act). ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Peña to adjourn at 5:20 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, NICHOLE ROMANE, Deputy City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 14 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADJUST PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS AND AWARD CONTRACT TO UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING FOR THE CITYWIDE MISCELLANEOUS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2020-02 RECOMMENDATION Adjust project budget appropriations and award a contract to Universal Construction and Engineering in the amount of $107,998 for the Citywide Miscellaneous Americans with Disabilities Act Improvements Project No. 2020- 02; and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •This project is located at two locations (Attachment 1): o Base Bid - Sidewalk Gap Closure on the east side of Jefferson Street south of Avenue 50. o Additive Alternate – New curb ramp on the southwest corner of Washington Street and Avenue 47. •Construction is funded with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, which must be expended by March 31, 2021. •Universal Construction and Engineering of Indio, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $107,998 (Attachment 2). Additive Alternate 1 is recommended for award. FISCAL IMPACT The adjusted project budget is $184,000, of which $56,538 is allocated from the Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project (Project No. 2021STI) and $127,462 from CDBG funds for construction costs as follows: CDBG Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project Total Budget Professional/Design: $ 0 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 0 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Construction: $ 107,998 $ 0 $ 107,998 Contingency: $ 19,464 $ 10,538 $ 30,002 Total Budget: $ 127,462 $ 56,538 $ 184,000 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 15 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 2011, the City conducted an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility survey of all public facilities. To date, the City has addressed ADA deficiencies at the Exterior and Interior of City Hall, La Quinta Park, Civic Center Campus, La Quinta Library, SilverRock parking lot, Museum, YMCA, Sports Complex, Velasco Park, Eisenhower Park, Adams Park, Desert Pride Park, Saguaro Park, Fritz Burns Park, Seasons Park, and the majority of Avenida Bermudas. This year’s CDBG project will include infilling missing links to provide more access to shopping developments and public transportation. On January 12, 2021 staff solicited construction bids from qualified contractors. The City received 2 bids on February 3, 2021. Universal Construction and Engineering of Indio, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $107,998. Contingent upon award of the project on February 16, 2021, the following is the project schedule: Council Considers Project Award February 16, 2021 Execute Contract and Mobilize February 17 to March 10, 2021 Construction (15 Working Days) March 11 to March 31, 2021 Accept Improvements April 2021 When the 2020/21 Budget was adopted the CBDG funding was estimated at $121,890, however, allocated funding was increased by $5,572 to $127,462. The adjusted project budget reflects this additional funding. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1.Project Vicinity Map 2. Bid Comparison Summary 16 *IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. © Riverside County GIS Legend From Avenue 50 to Derek Alan Drive Notes REPORT PRINTED ON...2/7/2019 11:38:16 AM Vicinity Map 0 12,0376, 019 Feet Blueline Streams City Areas World Street Map ATTACHMENT 1 17 18 Bid Opening Date: 2/3/2021 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Improvements City Project No. 2020-02 Attachment 2 - Bid Comparison Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 2 Traffic Control LS 1 13,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 10,875.00$ 10,875.00$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 3 Dust Control LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 1,800.00$ 1,800.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 4 Remove Existing Concrete Sidewalk and Ramp SF 515 6.00$ 3,090.00$ 8.00$ 4,120.00$ 6.00$ 3,090.00$ 5 Remove Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 58 20.00$ 1,160.00$ 21.00$ 1,218.00$ 45.00$ 2,610.00$ 6 Remove Existing Tree/Stump (includes wood fence repair/replacement as needed)EA 11 1,200.00$ 13,200.00$ 1,250.00$ 13,750.00$ 2,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 7 2" Grind and Overlay AC Pavement SF 246 $ 22.00 $ 5,412.00 $10.00 2,460.00$ $15.00 3,690.00$ 8 Construct Reinforced Retaining Curb and Sidewalk LS 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,600.00$ 4,600.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 9 Construct Sidewalk Per City of La Quinta Standard Plan 240 Mod.SF 3,467 10.00$ 34,670.00$ 7.00$ 24,269.00$ 8.00$ 27,736.00$ 10 Construct Curb Ramp Per City of La Quinta Standard Plan 250, Case B (Limits ECR/BCR)EA 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 9,500.00$ 9,500.00$ 11 Remove and Modify Existing Landscaping and Irrigation as Needed LS 1 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 5,800.00$ 5,800.00$ 9,500.00$ 9,500.00$ 12 Signing and Striping LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,600.00$ 3,600.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 101,532.00$ 85,492.00$ 118,626.00$ Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,630.00$ 1,630.00$ 9,500.00$ 9,500.00$ 2 Traffic Control LS 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3 Dust Control LS 1 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 4 Remove Existing Concrete Cross-Gutter SF 180 7.00$ 1,260.00$ 6.00$ 1,080.00$ 12.00$ 2,160.00$ 5 Remove Existing Concrete Median Curb LF 46 20.00$ 920.00$ 16.00$ 736.00$ 100.00$ 4,600.00$ 6 Construct Curb Ramp Per City of La Quinta Standard Plan 250 Mod., Case B (Limits ECR/BCR)EA 2 4,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 7 Construct Portion of Cross-Gutter Per City of La Quinta Standard Plan 230 Mod. and 231 Mod.SF 180 20.00$ 3,600.00$ 12.00$ 2,160.00$ 40.00$ 7,200.00$ 8 Remove and Modify Existing Landscaping and Irrigation as Needed LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 9 Signing and Striping LS 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 30,280.00$ 22,506.00$ 67,960.00$ 131,812.00$ 107,998.00$ 186,586.00$ 101,532.00$ 85,492.00$ 118,626.00$ Miscalculations and rounding errors IE General Engineering Inc.Universal Construction and EngineeringEngineer's Estimate - Base Bid Base Bid Only Bid Alternate No. 1 - Washington Street and Avenue 47 Sub-Total Bid Alternate No. 1: Sub-Total Base Bid: Grand Total Base Bid Including Alternate Nos. 1 : ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 219 20 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AMENDMENTS NO. 1 TO AGREEMENTS FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH NV5, INC AND THE ALTUM GROUP FOR ON-CALL CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SERVICES RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendments No. 1 to Agreements for Contract Services with NV5, Inc. and The Altum Group for on-call construction surveying services; authorize the City Manager to execute the amendments. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Construction projects often require surveying services, which necessitate skilled specialists. •In 2019 Staff solicited proposals for these services from qualified firms; NV5 Inc. and The Altum Group were the best qualified firms to provide these services, and the City entered into agreements for contract services with both firms. •Several large capital improvement projects under construction have required construction surveying services and utilized most of the existing $150,000 contract authority for this fiscal year. •Each agreement would be amended for an amount not to exceed $200,000 per year for a three-year term, which provides the flexibility to use one or both firms depending on work demand. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) technical account for these services (401-0000-60108). The revised total amount budgeted would increase from $150,000 to $200,000 for these services; Staff cannot exceed the $200,000 budget without Council approval. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In May 2019, the City received four proposals in response to the on-call construction survey services request for proposals. Staff reviewed the CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 21 proposals and both NV5, Inc. and The Altum Group were selected as the top ranked firms; NV5, Inc. (Attachment 1) and The Altum Group (Attachment 2) were the most cost effective and qualified firms. CASC and Albert A. Webb Associates also submitted proposals. Construction of several large capital improvement projects has utilized most of the existing contract authority for on-call construction surveying services this fiscal year. Additional contract authority in the amount of $50,000 is needed for a total “not to exceed” budget of $200,000. Staff would continue to track the monthly invoices to ensure the annual budget for these services is not exceeded. ALTERNATIVES Council could elect not to approve one or both amendments. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1.Amendment No. 1 with NV5, Inc. 2.Amendment No. 1 with The Altum Group 22 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH NV5, INC. This Amendment No. 1 ("Amendment No. 1") to Agreement for Contract Services (“Agreement”) with NV5, Inc. is made and entered into as of the 17th day of February, 2020 ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation and NV5, Inc., a California Corporation (“Contracting Party”). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about July 1, 2019, the City and Contracting Party entered into an Agreement to provide On-Call Construction Surveying Services. The term of the Agreement expires on June 30, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City and Contracting Party mutually agree to amend Section 2.1 Contract Sum of the Agreement for a total not to exceed amount of $200,000 per year beginning in fiscal year 2020/21. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.Section 2.1 Contract Sum is amended to read: 2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with “Exhibit B” (the “Schedule of Compensation”) in a total amount not to exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) for fiscal year 2019/20; and Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) per year, beginning in fiscal year 2020/21, for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the initial and any extended terms (the “Contract Sum”), except as provided in Section 1.7. 2.“Exhibit B” – Schedule of Compensation is amended as listed in “Exhibit B”, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. In all other respects, the Original Agreement shall remain in effect. ATTACHMENT 1 23 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Contract Services on the respective dates set forth below. CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation Dated: Jon McMillen, City Manager ATTEST: Monika Radeva, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William H. Ihrke, City Attorney CONSULTANT: NV5, INC., a California Corporation By: Dated: ________________ Name: Title: 24 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is not to exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) for fiscal year 2019/20; and Two Hundred Thousand Dollar ($200,000.00) per year for the life of the Agreement, beginning in fiscal year 2020/21, encompassing the initial and any extended terms (“Contract Sum”). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in an amount identified in Contracting Party’s schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Initial Term: “Not to exceed” Year 1 (FY2019/20): $150,000.00 “Not to exceed” Year 2 (FY2020/21): $200,000.00 “Not to exceed” Year 3 (FY2021/22): $200,000.00 Possible Extended Term: “Not to exceed” Year 4 (FY2022/23): $200,000.00 “Not to exceed” Year 5 (FY2023/24): $200,000.00 25 26 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH THE ALTUM GROUP, INC. This Amendment No. 1 ("Amendment No. 1") to Agreement for Contract Services (“Agreement”) with The Altum Group, Inc. is made and entered into as of the 17th day of February, 2020 ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation and The Altum Group, Inc., an S Corporation (“Contracting Party”). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about July 1, 2019, the City and Contracting Party entered into an Agreement to provide On-Call Construction Surveying Services. The term of the Agreement expires on June 30, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City and Contracting Party mutually agree to amend Section 2.1 Contract Sum of the Agreement for a total not to exceed amount of $200,000 per year beginning in fiscal year 2020/21. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.Section 2.1 Contract Sum is amended to read: 2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with “Exhibit B” (the “Schedule of Compensation”) in a total amount not to exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($150,000) for fiscal year 2019/20; and Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) per year, beginning in fiscal year 2020/21, for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the initial and any extended terms (the “Contract Sum”), except as provided in Section 1.7. 2.“Exhibit B” – Schedule of Compensation is amended as listed in “Exhibit B”, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. In all other respects, the Original Agreement shall remain in effect. 27 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Contract Services on the respective dates set forth below. CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation Dated: Jon McMillen, City Manager ATTEST: Monika Radeva, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William H. Ihrke, City Attorney CONSULTANT: ALTUM GROUP, an S Corporation By: Dated: ________________ Name: Title: 28 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is not to exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) for fiscal year 2019/20; and Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) per year for the life of the Agreement, beginning in fiscal year 2020/21, encompassing the initial and any extended terms (“Contract Sum”). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in an amount identified in Contracting Party’s schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Initial Term: “Not to exceed” Year 1 (FY2019/20): $150,000.00 “Not to exceed” Year 2 (FY2020/21): $200,000.00 “Not to exceed” Year 3 (FY2021/22): $200,000.00 Possible Extended Term: “Not to exceed” Year 4 (FY2022/23): $200,000.00 “Not to exceed” Year 5 (FY2023/24): $200,000.00 29 30 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH SCOPE EVENTS, LLC. TO HOST THE LA QUINTA ART CELEBRATION FROM NOVEMBER 11 TO NOVEMBER 14, 2021 RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Contract Services with SCOPE Events, LLC. to host the La Quinta Art Celebration from November 11 to November 14, 2021. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An event plan was submitted to the County of Riverside to safely execute the La Quinta Art Celebration (LQAC) amidst potential COVID-19 impacts. After careful consideration, the County of Riverside requested the LQAC be rescheduled due to COVID-19 risks. SCOPE Events (SCOPE) is seeking to change the LQAC date from March 4-7, 2021 to November 11-14, 2021 and transfer all terms and financial obligations from the 2020 event to 2021. Upon approval, Amendment No. 2 (Amendment) will extend the agreement one additional year. FISCAL IMPACT In exchange for the highest title sponsorship level, the City would incur Burrtec charges of approximately $5,000 from the recycling fund and up to $35,000 in digital, print, and social media marketing dollars through City advertisement buys. The $40,000 title sponsorship from the 2021 March 4-7 Event will be carried over to the next fiscal year for the November 11-14, 2021 Event. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The 2020 LQAC was successfully held March 5-8, 2020. With a wide variety of artists from around the world, a diverse selection of gourmet food and CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 31 beverages, and live entertainment contributed to an amazing art experience for patrons worldwide. Soon after the LQAC concluded, the State declared a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the cancellation of major events where large numbers of people gather. The year two LQAC was scheduled for March 4-7, 2021. In November 2020, a detailed event plan was submitted to Riverside County’s Health Department to host the LQAC in March 2021. After careful consideration, the County stated that even with sound COVID-19 mitigation and safety protocols to control the spread, they could not approve the LQAC and requested the Event be rescheduled to a later date. Due to the rescheduled event, SCOPE and the City would like to amend the original agreement for contract services to change the event date and transfer all terms and financial obligations from March 4-7 to November 11-14, 2021 (Attachment 1). In addition, planning efforts for a high-quality event are extensive and laborious, therefore SCOPE has also begun planning for the LQAC in March 2022 and is working with staff on securing a multi-year agreement for the event. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to approve the amendment or revise. Prepared by: Jaime Torres, Management Analyst Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director Attachment: 1. Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Contract Services 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO CONTRACT WITH JONES BROS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE SILVEROCK WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2014-13/141513 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A RETENTION BASIN RECOMMENDATION Approve Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $85,984 to Contract with Jones Bros Construction Company for the SilverRock Way Street Improvements backbone infrastructure Project 2014-13 for construction of a retention basin at the existing SilverRock Driving Range; and authorize the City Manager to execute the change order. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •On February 4, 2020, a contract was awarded to Jones Bros Construction Company (Contractor) for construction of the SilverRock Way Street Improvements backbone infrastructure (Project) (Attachment 1) and construction began in July 2020. •On December 1, 2020 Change Order No. 1 was authorized for $69,117 for storm drain material change, idle time, sewer alignment change, and miscellaneous additional work requests. •On February 8, 2021 Change Order No.2 was authorized for $39,238 for the construction of a retention basin along SilverRock Way near Jefferson Street. •Change Order No. 3 (Attachment 2) includes the construction of a retention basin at the SilverRock Driving Range for $85,984. FISCAL IMPACT There are sufficient funds in the project budget (Account No. 401-0000-60188, Project No. 141513) for change order in the amount of $85,984: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 41 Budget 2002 Bond Proceeds $ 6,753,700 Developer Agreement $ 906,341 Total Budget: $ 7,660,041 The following is a list of all change orders to date: Total Contract Original Contract Amount: $ 3,994,466 Change Order No. 1: $ 69,117 Change Order No. 2: $ 39,238 This Contract Change Order No. 3: $ 85,984 Final Contract Amount: $ 4,188,805 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Change Order No. 1 was for storm drain material change, idle time, sewer alignment change, and miscellaneous additional work requests. Change Order No.2 was for the construction of a retention basin along SilverRock Way near Jefferson Street. This retention basin was originally proposed to be mass graded in future Development phases; however, the timing required that it be constructed for the new road use. Proposed Change Order No. 3 is recommended for approval to construct a retention basin at the SilverRock Driving Range. During the mass grading the decision was made that the existing driving range would be too greatly impacted if the mass grading was completed as designed and the limits were reduced to keep it as intact as possible. Change Order No. 3 proposes to construct a temporary retention basin for the new road and future development to use in the interim. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternate. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1.Project Vicinity Map 2. Change Order No. 3 42 Vicinity Map SilverRock Way Street Improvements (Project No. 2014-13) ATTACHMENT 1 43 44 Sheet 1 of 2 CONTRACT: SilverRock Way Street Improvements PROJECT NO. 2014-13 CONTRACTOR: Jones Bros Construction Company 85900 Jones Court Coachella, CA 92236 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE -This Contract Change Order allows for Retention Basin at the SilverRock Driving Range. Total $85,984.00 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: - 0 - days added to contract time. The contract completion date shall be: 4/6/2021 Submitted By: Date: Approved By: Date: We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted By: Title: Contractor: Date: _____ Original Contract Amount $3,994,465.67 Contract Change Order No. 1 $69,116.55 Contract Change Order No. 2 $39,238.00 Add This Change Order No. 3 $85,984.00 Revised Contract Total $4,188,804.22 ATTACHMENT 2 45 PROPOSAL NO. JONES BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO. GRADING, PAVING, UNDERGROUND AND EQUIPMENT RENTALS 85-900 Jones Court, Coachella, Ca 92236 PO Box 905 (760) 347-2291 3359A Lie 406921 CONTRACT NO. PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: PHONE NAME: PROJECT City of La Quinta SilverRock ADDRESS: LOCATION: 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta DATE January 27, 2021 CITY AND STATE: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: DATE OF PLANS La Quinta, California 92253 ATTENTION: PROJECT PLANS NO. AND TITLE Lorissa Gruehl and Ubaldo Ayon Driving Range Retention Basin We hereby propose to furnish the necessary equipment, labor, and materials required to perform the following works: ITEM# 1.) 2.) 3.) 4.) 5.) 6.) 7.) 8.) 9.) 10.) 11.) 12.) 13.) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE MOBILIZATION MOBILIZATION IN AND OUT 1 EA $ RETENTION BASIN CLEARING 1 EA $ PRE-WATER 1 EA $ STRIP SOD 1 EA $ SITE EXCAVATION 1 EA $ FINISH 1 EA $ SCARIFY/REFINISH FILL AREA 1 EA $ FLAGMAN 1 EA $ ENVIRONTAC POLYMER (6 MONTHS GLUE) 5 ACRES $ GOLF CART PATH CLEARING us $ CART PATH us $ CLASS II RECYCLED BASE 300 TONS $ PLACE BASE us $ NOTES: 1. Bid includes listed items only 2. Bid excludes a. Engmeermg, inspections and permit fees b. Soil Testing c. Construction water costsd. Over excavation 5,750.00 4,600.00 6,325.00 6,624.00 17,595.00 17,365.00 4,600.00 2,070.00 483.00 1,000.00 3,840.00 18.00 8,400.00 e. 0t1hty removal, relocation and adJustmentf. Structural excavation and backfill ITOTAL g. lrri�ation line repair/cut/cap/electrical3. Bid based on unapprove plans. Bid may be revised upon receipt of approved plans and or soils report TOTAL PRICE $5,750.00 $4,600.00 $6,325.00 $6,624.00 $17,595.00 $17,365.00 $4,600.00 $2,070.00 $2,415.00 $1,000.00 $3,840.00 $5,400.00 $8,400.00 $85,984.00 4. Bid based on one move only. Grades to be certified to plus or minus one tenth of a foot of planned elevations and compaction prior to move out. 5. Owner to provide pressurized source for sufficient supply of construction water at construction site boundary.6.Site bid to balance. Proposal excludes any import or export if necessary 7. Site excavation to be placed w1thm 800' haul. 8.Stripszed sod to be left onsite east of driving range9. All irr1gat1on work by others10. All grass restoration by others Buyer and Seller agree that the general terms and conditions attached, hereof are part of this agreement are thoroughly understood. Notice: Additional Terms and Conditions are Attached. Read Before Signing --Buyer to sign both sides. ACCEPTED FOR BUYER By Submitted By Title Date Approved By 46 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PURCHASE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES VEHICLE RECOMMENDATION Approve purchase of an emergency services vehicle. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The vehicle currently assigned to Sr. Emergency Services Coordinator has reached its end-of-life. •Staff has researched vehicle availability and obtained quotes. •It has been determined that overall cost to the City will be lower if the vehicle is purchased rather than leased. FISCAL IMPACT The cost of the vehicle and its retrofit is $65,000. Funds to purchase this vehicle have been set aside in the fire services vehicle budget account (101-2002- 71031). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The vehicle currently in use is model year 2010 and has moved between City and County control. Most recently the vehicle was returned to the City in 2019 when the City ended their contract with the County for an Emergency Services Coordinator. The purchase of a replacement vehicle would support the City’s effort to prepare, prevent, respond, and recover from local emergencies. This vehicle will be used for community preparedness events, support of the City’s Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), field coordination and communication as well as towing equipment and trailers. Quotes for this vehicle were procured through Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing, which complies with the City’s purchasing policy. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 47 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative action. Prepared by: Zander Johnston, Sr. Emergency Management Coordinator Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director Attachment: 1. National Auto Fleet Group Quote 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JANUARY 29 AND FEBRUARY 5, 2021 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated January 29 and February 5, 2021. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City 1,889,668.00$ Successor Agency of RDA -$ Housing Authority 19,047.64$ 1,908,715.64$ BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for January 29 and February 5, 2021. Warrants Issued: 203834-203917 1,016,464.79$ 203918-203974 265,025.69$ Wire Transfers 396,043.13$ Payroll Tax Transfers 40,322.84$ Payroll Direct Deposit 190,859.19$ 1,908,715.64$ CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 59 The most significant expenditures on the demand registers are: Account Name Amount Urban Habitat Construction 425,249.53$ DEC-Landscape & SilverRock Park PWLC II INC Landscape 51,015.00$ JAN- City Landscape Contract Maintenance LOCALE Magazine Marketing & Tourism 49,500.00$ Marketing La Quinta Promotions Print & Digital Ads Vintage Associates Landscape 49,197.00$ JAN-City Parks Contract Maintenance Greater Palm GPSCVB 42,207.00$ Quarter 3 City Springs CVB Funding PurposeVendor Wire Transfers: Eight transfers totaled $396,043. Of this amount, $185,540 was for earthquake insurance and $163,612 was for Landmark. (See Attachment 2 for a full listing). Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions as well as total holdings are reported quarterly in the Treasurer’s Report. Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Settle Date Coupon Rate Purchase Federal Home Loan Bank Age ncy 500,000$ 1/29/21 0.550% Maturity Infinity FCU CD 248,000$ 2/1/21 2.100% ALTERNATIVES Council may approve, partially approve, or reject the demand registers. Prepared by: Jesse Batres, Account Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Attachments:1. Demand Registers 2.Wire Transfers 60 1/29/2021 11:36:59 AM Page 1 of 5 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT02673 - JB 01/29/21 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND 739.04Professional ServicesSTVR HOTLINE FY 2021203845CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS 101-6004-60103 658.38Professional ServicesSTVR HOTLINE FY 2021203845CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS 101-6004-60103 42,207.00GPSCVB01/01/21 - Q3 FY 20/21 CITY FUNDING203864GREATER PALM SPRINGS CVB 101-3007-60151 41.90Cable - Utilities01/16-02/15/21 - FS #70 CABLE (8152)203905TIME WARNER CABLE 101-2002-61400 215.00Membership Dues01/06/21 - MEMBERSHIP TO 03/31/22 M …203869IIMC 101-1005-60351 1,350.00Civic Center Lake MaintenanceSOUTHWEST AQUATICS INC.203899SOUTHWEST AQUATICS INC 101-3005-60117 200.00Membership Dues01/01-12/31/21 - MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL203835AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS 101-3003-60351 4,113.00MSHCP Mitigation Fee12/2020 - MSHCP FEES203848COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERV…101-0000-20310 -41.13CVMSHCP Admin Fee12/2020 - MSHCP FEES203848COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERV…101-0000-43631 262.17Uniforms01/05/21 - CODE OFFICER UNIFORMS VIL…203862GALLS LLC 101-6004-60690 90.04Cable - Utilities01/16-02/15/21 - FS #31 CABLE (1860)203905TIME WARNER CABLE 101-2002-61400 89.50Maintenance/Services05/02/20 - MAIN MOTOR REPLACED203898SOUTHLAND APLIANCE SERVICE 101-2002-60691 325.00Maintenance/Services06/08/20 - FS #93 REPLACE COMPRESSOR203898SOUTHLAND APLIANCE SERVICE 101-2002-60691 4,465.00Materials/Supplies01/20/21 - PLAYGROUND PLAYFIBER203837APOLLO WOOD PRODUCTS 101-3005-60431 682.46Administrative Citation ServicesCitation Processing Center 7/1/20-12/31/…203852DATA TICKET, INC.101-6004-60111 128.63Supplies-Graffiti and Vandalism01/19/21 - GRAFFITTI SUPPLIES203889OMEGA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, I…101-3005-60423 9.75Citywide Conf Room Supplies01/22/21 - CITYWIDE DRINKING WATER C…203900SPARKLETTS 101-1007-60403 3,150.00Contract Services - Administrat…FY 20/21 LOBBYIST SERVICES203873JOE A GONSALVES & SON 101-1002-60101 8,000.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…Graphic Design Services203838ARK CONNECTS LLC 101-3007-60461 139.64PM 10 - Dust Control12/21/20-01/17/21 - PM 10 ANSWERING …203836ANSAFONE CONTACT CENTERS 101-7006-60146 221.97LQ Police Volunteers01/20/21 - FALSE ALARM POSTCARDS203916XPRESS GRAPHICS 101-2001-60109 35,764.75Landscape ContractFY 20/21 PARKS VINTAGE ASSOCIATES, INC.203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 101-3005-60112 92.51Tools/Equipment01/20/21 - CHAIN LOOP/EQUIPMENT PAR…203885MOWERS PLUS INC 101-7003-60432 307.10Supplies-Graffiti and Vandalism01/19/21 - PAINT FOR GRAFFITI SUPPLIES203904THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.101-3005-60423 2,528.00Blood/Alcohol Testing12/04-12/18/20 - BLOOD/ALCOHOL ANAL…203841BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 101-2001-60174 86.54Operating Supplies01/11/21 - EXTENSION CORD/ DRILL BITS203867HD SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION S…101-7003-60420 1,000.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/26/21 - 20 IMAGES FOR MARKETING203865GREEN, LAURA R.101-3007-60461 370.00Map/Plan CheckingOn Call Map Checking Services203892RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 10,303.86JanitorialCity Hall Janitorial203884MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT…101-3008-60115 848.03Materials/Supplies01/11/21 - BATTERIES FOR COVE RESTRO…203853DESERT BATTERY CO INC 101-3008-60431 1,242.42Landscape ContractFY 20/21 FIRE STATION PWLC II, INC.203891PWLC II, INC 101-2002-60112 52.47Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites12/14/20-01/13/21 - EOC CELL SVC (7813)203911VERIZON WIRELESS 101-2002-61304 320.87Water - Utilities01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-2002-61200 1,764.87Water - Civic Center Park - Utili…01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61202 101.20Water -Fritz Burns Park - Utiliti…01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61204 17.68Water -Seasons Park - Utilities01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61208 2,320.87Water -Community Park - Utilit…01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61209 72.99Water - Utilities01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3008-61200 144.63Maintenance/Services11/30/20 - FS # 32 RECESSED DOWNLIGHT203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-2002-60691 43.41Materials/Supplies12/16/20 - ANCHORS/STAR BITS203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-3005-60431 33.30Materials/Supplies12/08/20 - PIPE FITTINGS203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-3005-60431 175.19Materials/Supplies12/15/20 - CONCRETE BAGS203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-3005-60431 118.76Tools/Equipment12/16/20 - MECHANICS TOOL SET203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-3005-60432 71.16Materials/Supplies12/01/20 - TAPE/OUTLET DIALS MATERIALS203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-3008-60431 36.71Materials/Supplies12/10/20 - FLEXABLE HOSE203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-3008-60431 -105.39Tools/Equipment12/16/20 - RETURN BATTERY CHARGER203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-3008-60432 108.91Operating Supplies12/15/20 - GAS CANS AND SUPPLIES203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-7003-60420 38.21Operating Supplies12/17/20 - WD40 CANS203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…101-7003-60420 1,683.76Professional ServicesASSOCIA SECURITY - STVR PATROLS203855DESERT RESORT MANAGEMENT 101-6004-60103 334.84Operating Supplies12/2020 - RADIO MAINT203894RIVERSIDE COUNTY INFORMAT…101-2001-60420 661.30Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance10/07/20 - FRITZ BURNS POOL REPAIR203886OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 101-3005-60184 750.00LQ Park Water FeatureOCEAN SPRINGS TECH, INC203886OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 101-3005-60554 139.11Water - Utilities01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-2002-61200 ATTACHMENT 1 61 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02673 - JB 01/29/21 1/29/2021 11:36:59 AM Page 2 of 5 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 64.51Water -Eisenhower Park - Utilit…01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61203 397.83Water -Velasco Park - Utilities01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61205 39.55PM 10 - Dust Control01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-7006-60146 173.85Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites01/23-02/22/21 - EOC SATELLITE PHONES203895ROADPOST USA INC.101-2002-61304 2,133.74ConsultantsQ2/2020 - CONTRACT/AUDIT SVCS SALES …203868HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & AS…101-1006-60104 695.26Consultants12/23/20 - Q2/2020 TRANS TAX MEASURE…203868HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & AS…101-1006-60104 Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Total:131,980.15 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND 642.01Traffic Control Signs01/25/21 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS203906TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total:642.01 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 143.55Operating Supplies01/20/21 - 12 BOOKS FOR FEB'S BOOK CL…203878LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOCIE…202-3006-60420 773.50Landscape ContractFY 20/21 LIBRARY VINTAGE ASSOCIATES, I…203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 202-3004-60112 161.50Landscape ContractFY 20/21 MUSEUM VINTAGE ASSOCIATES, …203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 202-3006-60112 2,538.23JanitorialLIBRARY JANITORIAL SERVICES203884MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT…202-3004-60115 640.01JanitorialMUSEUM JANITORIAL SERVICES203884MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT…202-3006-60115 126.24Telephone - Utilities01/13-02/12/21 - MUSUEM PHONE203861FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…202-3006-61300 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total:4,383.03 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 1,246.28Materials/Supplies01/22/21 - PURCHASE OF PLANTS203842C.V CACTUS NURSERY 215-7004-60431 5,278.00SilverRock Way LandscapeLANDMARK GOLF MANAGEMENT L.L.C.203879LANDMARK GOLF MANAGEM…215-7004-60143 128.64Supplies-Graffiti and Vandalism01/19/21 - GRAFFITTI SUPPLIES203889OMEGA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, I…215-7004-60423 5,397.33ConsultantsCREATIVE LIGHTING & ELECTRICAL, INC.203851CREATIVE LIGHTING & ELECTR…215-7004-60104 10,085.25Landscape ContractFY 20/21 L & L VINTAGE ASSOCIATES, INC.203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60112 56.91Materials/Supplies01/21/21 - POLY FILM/PAINTER TAPE203904THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.215-7004-60431 478.50Materials/Supplies01/22/21 - PALM TREE203914W.D. YOUNG & SONS 215-7004-60431 49,772.58Landscape ContractFY 20/21 L & LPWLC II, INC.203891PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60112 41.76Electric - Utilities01/10-02/09/21 - PHONE SVC203861FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…215-7004-61116 530.00Electric - Utilities01/21/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203870IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61116 51.05Electric - Medians - Utilities01/21/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203870IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61117 8,976.10Water - Medians - Utilities01/21/21 - WATER SVC203849COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 125.53Materials/Supplies01/22/21 - PLANTS203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60431 717.08Materials/Supplies01/11/21 - PLANTS203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60431 360.97Materials/Supplies01/14/21 - PLANTS203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60431 45.26Materials/Supplies01/22/21 - PLANTS203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60431 1,163.16Materials/Supplies01/22/21 - PLANTS203912VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60431 554.46Materials/Supplies01/25/21 - ELECTRICAL WIRE203854DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 215-7004-60431 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total:85,008.86 Fund: 224 - TUMF FUND 11,550.00TUMF Payable to CVAG12/2020 - TUMF FEES203847COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC OF…224-0000-20320 Fund 224 - TUMF FUND Total:11,550.00 Fund: 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 13,686.55Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON RELIEF …203840ASPEN MILLS BREAD CO.247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203839ASADERO LOS CORRALES 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203893RED ANGEL SALON & BLOWDR…247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203887OLD TOWN MASSAGE 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203880LG'S PRIME STREAKHOUSE-LA…247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203888OLD TOWN NAIL SALON 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203913VU FAMILY INC.247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203877LA QUINTA BAKING COMPANY 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203896SALON MONTANA OLD TOWN 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203897SAWA SUSHI INC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203875LA BRASSERIE LLC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203901STYLE NAILS 247-0000-60510 12,874.39Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203902SUPERCUTS 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203834ACTIVITA LLC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203903THE GRILL ON MAIN 247-0000-60510 10,293.44Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203908TQLAS INC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203909TY HEALING CENTER 247-0000-60510 62 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02673 - JB 01/29/21 1/29/2021 11:36:59 AM Page 3 of 5 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203917YOU GRILL KOREAN BBQ 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203883MCARTHUR, HEIDI 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203860FORTUN'S KITCHEN AND BAR, …247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203859FOOTLOOSE REFLEXOLOGY LLC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203872JAK BURGERS LLC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203915WASHACK BROS. INC.247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203858FISHERMAN'S MARKET & GRILL 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203882LQEWC INC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203850COOKING WITH CLASS 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203844CASA MENDOZA RESTAURANT 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203846CN NAILS SPA 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203866HASHIMOTO CHIROPRACTIC I…247-0000-60510 11,852.74Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…01/29/21 COVID-19 EMERG ECON REBATE…203871INTERNATIONAL SALES ASSOC…247-0000-60510 Fund 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Total:308,707.12 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 2,030.53Construction11/05/20 - REPLACEMENT SIGN FOR DEP…203874JTB SUPPLY CO., INC.401-0000-60188 1,716.00Construction01/22/21 - 2020-02 BID POSTING FOR CD…203876LA PRENSA HISPANA 401-0000-60188 -8,916.30Retention Payable12/2020 - RETENTION PAYMENT203910URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-20600 178,326.00Construction2016-03E LQ LANDSCAPE IMPR - RANCHO…203910URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-60188 -13,465.25Retention Payable12/2020 - RETENTION PAYMENT203910URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-20600 269,305.08Construction2016-08 SILVERROCK PARK VENUE203910URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-60188 215.49Construction01/15/21 - 2020-02 BID SET ORDER203890PLANIT REPROGRAPHICS SYST…401-0000-60188 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total:429,211.55 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 1,759.33Fuel & Oil12/16-12/31/20 - FUEL203907TOWER ENERGY GROUP 501-0000-60674 2,360.36Fuel & Oil01/01-01/15/21 - FUEL203907TOWER ENERGY GROUP 501-0000-60674 18,784.63Vehicles, Rentals & Leases12/2020 - FLEET LEASE203857ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 501-0000-71030 18,414.18Vehicles, Rentals & Leases01/2021 - FLEET LEASE203857ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 501-0000-71030 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total:41,318.50 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 150.43Cable - Utilities12/15/20-01/14/21 - WC CABLE (8105)203905TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-61400 2,079.00Cable - Utilities01/10-02/09/21 - C.H. FIBER INTERNET (2…203905TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-61400 82.08Cable - Utilities01/12-02/11/21 - C.Y. CABLE (4080)203905TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-61400 736.30CopiersCANON COPIER CONTRACT - CITY CLERKS203843CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, …502-0000-60662 490.00Software Licenses01/25/21 - 2021 AUTOCAD RENEWAL SUB…203856DLT SOLUTIONS LLC 502-0000-60301 95.98Cable - Utilities01/10-02/09/21 - C.H. INTERNET203861FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61400 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total:3,633.79 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 4.00Bank Fees12/2020 - SRR ARMORED SVC203863GARDAWORLD 601-0000-60455 25.78Repair & Maintenance12/08/20 - SRR REPAIR SUPPLIES203881LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT…601-0000-60660 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total:29.78 Grand Total:1,016,464.79 63 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02673 - JB 01/29/21 1/29/2021 11:36:59 AM Page 4 of 5 Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 101 - GENERAL FUND 131,980.15 201 - GAS TAX FUND 642.01 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 4,383.03 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 85,008.86 224 - TUMF FUND 11,550.00 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 308,707.12 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 429,211.55 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 41,318.50 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 3,633.79 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 29.78 Grand Total:1,016,464.79 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-0000-20310 MSHCP Mitigation Fee 4,113.00 101-0000-43631 CVMSHCP Admin Fee -41.13 101-1002-60101 Contract Services - Admini…3,150.00 101-1005-60351 Membership Dues 215.00 101-1006-60104 Consultants 2,829.00 101-1007-60403 Citywide Conf Room Suppl…9.75 101-2001-60109 LQ Police Volunteers 221.97 101-2001-60174 Blood/Alcohol Testing 2,528.00 101-2001-60420 Operating Supplies 334.84 101-2002-60112 Landscape Contract 1,242.42 101-2002-60691 Maintenance/Services 559.13 101-2002-61200 Water - Utilities 459.98 101-2002-61304 Mobile/Cell Phones/Satell…226.32 101-2002-61400 Cable - Utilities 131.94 101-3003-60351 Membership Dues 200.00 101-3005-60112 Landscape Contract 35,764.75 101-3005-60117 Civic Center Lake Mainten…1,350.00 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Maintena…661.30 101-3005-60423 Supplies-Graffiti and Van…435.73 101-3005-60431 Materials/Supplies 4,716.90 101-3005-60432 Tools/Equipment 118.76 101-3005-60554 LQ Park Water Feature 750.00 101-3005-61202 Water - Civic Center Park -…1,764.87 101-3005-61203 Water -Eisenhower Park -…64.51 101-3005-61204 Water -Fritz Burns Park - …101.20 101-3005-61205 Water -Velasco Park - Utili…397.83 101-3005-61208 Water -Seasons Park - Util…17.68 101-3005-61209 Water -Community Park -…2,320.87 101-3007-60151 GPSCVB 42,207.00 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pro…9,000.00 101-3008-60115 Janitorial 10,303.86 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 955.90 101-3008-60432 Tools/Equipment -105.39 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 72.99 101-6004-60103 Professional Services 3,081.18 101-6004-60111 Administrative Citation Se…682.46 101-6004-60690 Uniforms 262.17 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 370.00 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 233.66 101-7003-60432 Tools/Equipment 92.51 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 179.19 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 642.01 202-3004-60112 Landscape Contract 773.50 202-3004-60115 Janitorial 2,538.23 202-3006-60112 Landscape Contract 161.50 64 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02673 - JB 01/29/21 1/29/2021 11:36:59 AM Page 5 of 5 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 202-3006-60115 Janitorial 640.01 202-3006-60420 Operating Supplies 143.55 202-3006-61300 Telephone - Utilities 126.24 215-7004-60104 Consultants 5,397.33 215-7004-60112 Landscape Contract 59,857.83 215-7004-60143 SilverRock Way Landscape 5,278.00 215-7004-60423 Supplies-Graffiti and Van…128.64 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 4,748.15 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 571.76 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utiliti…51.05 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utilities 8,976.10 224-0000-20320 TUMF Payable to CVAG 11,550.00 247-0000-60510 Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Rel…308,707.12 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable -22,381.55 401-0000-60188 Construction 451,593.10 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 4,119.69 501-0000-71030 Vehicles, Rentals & Leases 37,198.81 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 490.00 502-0000-60662 Copiers 736.30 502-0000-61400 Cable - Utilities 2,407.49 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 4.00 601-0000-60660 Repair & Maintenance 25.78 Grand Total:1,016,464.79 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense AmountProject Account Name Project Name **None**585,569.48**None****None** 201603CT 178,326.00Construction Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement 201603RP -8,916.30Retention Payable La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement 201608CT 269,305.08Construction Expense SilverRock Event Space 201608RP -13,465.25Retention Payable SilverRock Event Space 202002CT 1,931.49Construction Expene Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Improvements 2021TMICT 2,030.53Construction Expense FY20/21 Traffic Maintenance Improvements STVRE 1,683.76Short Term Vacation Rental Expense Short Term Vacation Rental Tracking Grand Total:1,016,464.79 65 2/4/2021 7:27:58 PM Page 1 of 5 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT02680 - JB 02/05/21 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND 72.00United Way DeductionsCONTRIBUTION203970UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 101-0000-20981 1,000.00Administrative Citations01/22/20 - REFUND CITATION DISMISSAL …203929CISSELL, MAVERICK 101-0000-42700 500.00Administrative Citation Services01/28/21 - CITATION REDUCED REFUND L…203958RUOBING AL OR ZHUO SHENG 101-6004-60111 31.60Supplies - Field07/14/20 - PEPPER SPRAY & HOSTER203940GALLS LLC 101-6004-60425 254.66Uniforms01/06/21 - OFFICER UNIFORMS VILLANUE…203940GALLS LLC 101-6004-60690 5,000.00Grants & Economic Developm…02/02/21 - EXPLORER ACADEMY TRAINING…203956RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF EXPLO…101-3001-60510 -12,495.00Boys & Girls Club02/28/20 - RECLASS TO 210-0000-60135203922BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACH…101-3001-60135 -5,610.00Boys & Girls Club04/09/20 - RECLASS TO 210-0000-60135203922BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACH…101-3001-60135 114.34Cable - Utilities01/24-02/23/21 - FS #93 CABLE (2415)203968TIME WARNER CABLE 101-2002-61400 -60.00Printing07/09/20 -DUPLICATE CONTROL # 20955203959SAFECHECKS 101-1006-60410 528.12Printing01/30/21 - CHECK STOOK 23301-25000203959SAFECHECKS 101-1006-60410 4,619.00Membership DuesFY 20/21 DUES ASSESSMENT203963SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC…101-1002-60351 77.81Operating Supplies01/13/21 - DRINKING WATER203965SPARKLETTS 101-7003-60420 26.18Printing12/18/20 - 1099 G 2020 FORMS203952OFFICE DEPOT 101-1006-60410 28.16Office Supplies01/13/20 - DESK NAME PLATE P.VILLANU…203954POWERS AWARDS INC 101-6004-60400 368.00ConsultantsWELLNESS WORKS - EMPLOYEE ASSISTAN…203973WELLNESS WORKS 101-1004-60104 77.37Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites01/2021 - SATELLITE PHONES203950NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 101-2002-61304 22,000.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…REGIONAL PRINT MAGAZINE203947LOCALE MAGAZINE 101-3007-60461 -23.91Office Supplies01/14/21 - CREDIT FOR INV # 3466364297203966STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-3005-60400 267.46Forms, Copier Paper01/19/21 - CITY-WIDE COPY PAPER203966STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-1007-60402 12.27Office Supplies01/26/21 - POST-ITS & CALENDAR203966STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-1006-60400 5,000.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…REGIONAL PRINT MAGAZINE203947LOCALE MAGAZINE 101-3007-60461 22,500.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…REGIONAL PRINT MAGAZINE203947LOCALE MAGAZINE 101-3007-60461 648.00Blood/Alcohol Testing09/10/-09/30/20 - BLOOD TEST203921BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 101-2001-60174 983.60Marketing & Tourism Promoti…ALPHA MEDIA - COMMUNITY OUTREACH …203918ALPHA MEDIA LLC 101-3007-60461 1,161.90Marketing & Tourism Promoti…ALPHA MEDIA - COMMUNITY OUTREACH …203918ALPHA MEDIA LLC 101-3007-60461 1,156.25Temporary Agency Services01/08/21 - HUB TEMP SVCS M GONZALEZ203957ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 101-6006-60125 577.92Temporary Agency Services01/15/21 - HUB TEMP SVCS M GONZALEZ203957ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 101-6006-60125 500.00Annual Permits/Inspections01/21/21 - WC ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER I…203961SHASTA FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-3008-60196 33.16Postage01/15/21 - OVERNIGHT MAIL203937FEDEX 101-1007-60470 2,654.50Maintenance/ServicesON-CALL ELECTRICAL SERVICES203971VINTAGE E & S INC 101-3005-60691 110.00Blood/Alcohol Testing09/10-09/30/20 - BLOOD TESTS203919AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES …101-2001-60174 19.25LQ Police Volunteers12/11/20 - POLICE SHRED203962SHRED-IT USA - SAN BERNADI…101-2001-60109 19.25LQ Police Volunteers01/11/21 - POLICE SHRED203962SHRED-IT USA - SAN BERNADI…101-2001-60109 135.30Materials/Supplies01/27/21 - MULTI ROLL TISSUE DISPENSER…203938FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 101-3008-60431 13,649.14Animal Shelter Contract Service12/2020 - ANIMAL SERVICES203931DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SER…101-6004-60197 79.00Maintenance/Services12/07/20 - FS #32 HVAC SVC203939FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING …101-2002-60691 1,017.15Electricity - Utilities01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-2002-61101 3,108.04Electric - Civic Center Park - Uti…01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61103 1,067.86Electric - Fritz Burns Park - Utili…01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61105 8,072.71Electricity - Utilities01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3008-61101 125.00PM 10 - Dust Control01/27/21 - WATER SERVICE203930COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-7006-60146 3,648.15Professional ServicesASSOCIA SECURITY - STVR PATROLS203933DESERT RESORT MANAGEMENT 101-6004-60103 99.66Cable - Utilities01/22-02/21/21 - EOC CABLE203934DISH NETWORK 101-2002-61400 1,603.33Marketing & Tourism Promoti…NCM Theater Advertising203949NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 101-3007-60461 15.29Gas - Utilities12/21/20-01/21/21 - FS #32 GAS SVC203967THE GAS COMPANY 101-2002-61100 635.89Gas - Utilities12/21/20-01/21/21 - C.H GAS203967THE GAS COMPANY 101-3008-61100 15.29Gas-Utilities FB Pool12/21/20-01/21/21 - FB BOOL203967THE GAS COMPANY 101-3005-61100 434.32Gas - Utilities12/21/20-01/21/21 - WC GAS203967THE GAS COMPANY 101-3008-61100 12.09Postage01/17/21 - FINANCE CHARGES203955QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC.101-1007-60470 1,950.00Fritz Burns Pool MaintenanceOCEAN SPRINGS TECH, INC203951OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 101-3005-60184 2,152.96Water -Fritz Burns Park - Utiliti…01/27/21 - WATER SERVICE203930COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61204 540.80Water - Utilities01/27/21 - WATER SERVICE203930COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3008-61200 66 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02680 - JB 02/05/21 2/4/2021 7:27:58 PM Page 2 of 5 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 1,029.00Sexual Assault Exam Fees08/16/20 - SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM203960SANTA MONICA UCLA MEDICA…101-2001-60193 4,562.50ConsultantsPROPERTY TAXES CONTRACT203942HDL COREN & CONE 101-1006-60104 Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Total:96,105.37 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND 80.95Materials/Supplies02/01/21 - DIG ALERT FEES203969UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 201-7003-60431 327.83Materials/Supplies12/17/20 - ASPHALT203925CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL AS…201-7003-60431 557.55Electricity - Utilities01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 201-7003-61101 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total:966.33 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 1,789.60Electricity - Utilities01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 202-3004-61101 717.44Electricity - Utilities01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 202-3006-61101 64.82Gas - Utilities12/21/20-01/21/21 - LIBRARY GAS SVC203967THE GAS COMPANY 202-3004-61100 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total:2,571.86 Fund: 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 12,495.00CDBG Public Service Grants02/28/20 - RECLASS FROM 101-3001-601…203922BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACH…210-0000-60135 5,610.00CDBG Public Service Grants04/09/20 - RECLASS FROM 101-3001-601…203922BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACH…210-0000-60135 Fund 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND Total:18,105.00 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 6,528.00SilverRock Way LandscapeLANDMARK GOLF MANAGEMENT L.L.C.203946LANDMARK GOLF MANAGEM…215-7004-60143 5,278.00SilverRock Way LandscapeLANDMARK GOLF MANAGEMENT L.L.C.203946LANDMARK GOLF MANAGEM…215-7004-60143 2,399.94Materials/Supplies01/28/21 - 3/4" ROCK203964SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO…215-7004-60431 1,024.16Materials/Supplies01/27/21 - DG MATERIAL203964SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO…215-7004-60431 2,224.26Materials/Supplies01/27/21 - AZ RIVER ROCK203964SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO…215-7004-60431 2,298.22Electric - Utilities01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61116 1,313.15Electric - Medians - Utilities01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61117 6,525.72Water - Medians - Utilities01/27/21 - WATER SERVICE203930COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 43.47Materials/Supplies01/26/21 - PVC PIPES203972WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…215-7004-60431 593.48Materials/Supplies01/27/21 - LED LIGHT BULBS203972WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…215-7004-60431 836.51Materials/Supplies01/22/21 - LED LIGHT BULBS/ADAPTER203972WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…215-7004-60431 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total:29,064.91 Fund: 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 238.89Electricity - Utilities01/27/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE203944IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 235-0000-61101 Fund 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND Total:238.89 Fund: 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 6,425.00Professional ServicesHOUSING COMPLIANCE AND MONITORIN…203924CAHA, BECKY 241-9101-60103 Fund 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY Total:6,425.00 Fund: 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203935EL RANCHITO RESTAURANT 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203948NASH SOURIAL, DDS, INC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203953PACIFIC CLIFFHOUSE LP 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203945LA QUINTA BREWING CO.247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203936FANCY NAILS 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203932DESERT FASHIONS INC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203928CHULA CAFES LLC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203922BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACH…247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203927CASITA STUDIOS 247-0000-60510 174.10Marketing & Tourism Promoti…12/23/20 - CITY'S COVID 19 TEST SITE203974XPRESS GRAPHICS 247-0000-60461 5,597.42Marketing & Tourism Promoti…ONCALL ELECTRICAL SERVICES 247 FUND203943HEGGE ELECTRICAL CONTRAC…247-0000-60461 Fund 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Total:95,771.52 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 391.89APP Maintenance01/22/21 - GRAVEL FOR MURAL SITE203964SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO…270-0000-60683 655.53APP Maintenance01/26/21 - GRAVEL FOR MURAL SITE203964SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO…270-0000-60683 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total:1,047.42 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS -149.20Retention Payable2017-22 RETENTION PAYMENT203923BUNKER ENGINEERING 401-0000-20600 2,984.00Construction2017-22 FRITZ BURNS PARK SIDEWALK A…203923BUNKER ENGINEERING 401-0000-60188 67 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02680 - JB 02/05/21 2/4/2021 7:27:58 PM Page 3 of 5 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 3,828.74DesignDUNE PALMS BRIDGE LOW WATER CROSS…203920BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 401-0000-60185 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total:6,663.54 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 8.87Cable - Utilities01/20-02/19/21 - WC CABLE (1909)203968TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-61400 250.42Cable - Utilities01/24-02/23/21 - WC CABLE (4601)203968TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-61400 11,808.00Software LicensesGOREQUEST & GOENFORCE SUBSCRIPTI…203941GOGOV APPS, INC.502-0000-60301 -4,920.00Software LicensesCREDIT MEMO-21-01-Go Request Softwar…203941GOGOV APPS, INC.502-0000-60301 883.56CopiersCANON COPIER CONTRACT - CITY CLERKS203926CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, …502-0000-60662 35.00CopiersCANON COPIER CONTRACT - CITY CLERKS203926CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, …502-0000-60662 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total:8,065.85 Grand Total:265,025.69 68 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02680 - JB 02/05/21 2/4/2021 7:27:58 PM Page 4 of 5 Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 101 - GENERAL FUND 96,105.37 201 - GAS TAX FUND 966.33 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 2,571.86 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 18,105.00 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 29,064.91 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 238.89 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 6,425.00 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 95,771.52 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 1,047.42 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 6,663.54 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 8,065.85 Grand Total:265,025.69 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-0000-20981 United Way Deductions 72.00 101-0000-42700 Administrative Citations 1,000.00 101-1002-60351 Membership Dues 4,619.00 101-1004-60104 Consultants 368.00 101-1006-60104 Consultants 4,562.50 101-1006-60400 Office Supplies 12.27 101-1006-60410 Printing 494.30 101-1007-60402 Forms, Copier Paper 267.46 101-1007-60470 Postage 45.25 101-2001-60109 LQ Police Volunteers 38.50 101-2001-60174 Blood/Alcohol Testing 758.00 101-2001-60193 Sexual Assault Exam Fees 1,029.00 101-2002-60691 Maintenance/Services 79.00 101-2002-61100 Gas - Utilities 15.29 101-2002-61101 Electricity - Utilities 1,017.15 101-2002-61304 Mobile/Cell Phones/Satell…77.37 101-2002-61400 Cable - Utilities 214.00 101-3001-60135 Boys & Girls Club -18,105.00 101-3001-60510 Grants & Economic Devel…5,000.00 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Maintena…1,950.00 101-3005-60400 Office Supplies -23.91 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 2,654.50 101-3005-61100 Gas-Utilities FB Pool 15.29 101-3005-61103 Electric - Civic Center Park…3,108.04 101-3005-61105 Electric - Fritz Burns Park -…1,067.86 101-3005-61204 Water -Fritz Burns Park - …2,152.96 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pro…53,248.83 101-3008-60196 Annual Permits/Inspectio…500.00 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 135.30 101-3008-61100 Gas - Utilities 1,070.21 101-3008-61101 Electricity - Utilities 8,072.71 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 540.80 101-6004-60103 Professional Services 3,648.15 101-6004-60111 Administrative Citation Se…500.00 101-6004-60197 Animal Shelter Contract S…13,649.14 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 28.16 101-6004-60425 Supplies - Field 31.60 101-6004-60690 Uniforms 254.66 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servic…1,734.17 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 77.81 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 125.00 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 408.78 201-7003-61101 Electricity - Utilities 557.55 202-3004-61100 Gas - Utilities 64.82 69 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02680 - JB 02/05/21 2/4/2021 7:27:58 PM Page 5 of 5 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 202-3004-61101 Electricity - Utilities 1,789.60 202-3006-61101 Electricity - Utilities 717.44 210-0000-60135 CDBG Public Service Grants 18,105.00 215-7004-60143 SilverRock Way Landscape 11,806.00 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 7,121.82 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 2,298.22 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utiliti…1,313.15 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utilities 6,525.72 235-0000-61101 Electricity - Utilities 238.89 241-9101-60103 Professional Services 6,425.00 247-0000-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pro…5,771.52 247-0000-60510 Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Rel…90,000.00 270-0000-60683 APP Maintenance 1,047.42 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable -149.20 401-0000-60185 Design 3,828.74 401-0000-60188 Construction 2,984.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 6,888.00 502-0000-60662 Copiers 918.56 502-0000-61400 Cable - Utilities 259.29 Grand Total:265,025.69 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense AmountProject Account Name Project Name **None**252,394.40**None****None** 111205D 3,828.74Design Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5433(014) 201722CT 2,984.00Construction Expense Fritz Burns Parks Sidewalk and Parking Lot Improve 201722RP -149.20Retention Payable Fritz Burns Parks Sidewalk and Parking Lot Improve CORONANR 2,319.60Corona Non Reimbursable Corona Virus Emergency Response STVRE 3,648.15Short Term Vacation Rental Expense Short Term Vacation Rental Tracking Grand Total:265,025.69 70 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 01/23 – 02/05/2021 Wire Transaction 163,612.28$ 20,470.86$ 13,667.59$ 5,817.10$ 6,200.29$ 423.00$ 311.76$ 185,540.25$ Listed below are the wire transfers from 01/23 – 02/05/21 Wire Transfers: 02/03/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK 02/05/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 02/05/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 02/05/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 02/05/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 02/05/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 02/05/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 02/05/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - EARTHQUAKE INS TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT 396,043.13$ ATTACHMENT 2 71 72 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FEDERAL AWARDS REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Federal Awards Reports in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Government agencies receiving an excess of $750,000 from Federal funds during a fiscal year must obtain a single audit by an independent auditor. The annual single audit of federal funds produces the Federal Awards Report (Attachment 1), which is submitted to external awarding and oversight agencies. The independent auditors found no internal control deficiencies or findings. This Report is being presented to the Financial Advisory Commission on February 24, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT - None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Agencies awarded an excess of $750,000 in federal funds during a fiscal year require an additional audit and analysis by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). This audit is in addition to the basic financial statements audit, which produced the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), however, it uses the underlaying accounting and records used to prepare the CAFR. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 73 The federal awards audit was completed by Eide Bailly Certified Public Accountants for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. The independent audit involved auditing internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program and to test and report on internal controls over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. The independent auditors found no internal control deficiencies or findings. Many State funds, such as those administered by the State of California Department of Transportation, are subrecipients of federal funds and therefore subject to Uniform Guidance regulations under this audit. For fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the City of La Quinta expensed a total of $2,607,229 awarded by six grant programs. These funds were leveraged for road improvements, emergency preparedness, and accessibility compliance. The Federal Awards Report was submitted to the State Controller’s Office, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The Report demonstrates proper oversight of federal funds and compliance with regulatory requirements. This Report shall be used to qualify for future federal funds. The Report will be presented to the Financial Advisory Commission during their next meeting on February 24, 2021. ALTERNATIVES The Federal Awards Report is a requirement for agencies receiving more than $750,000 in federal funds during a fiscal year, therefore, no alternatives are recommended. Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Accounting Manager Approved by: Karla Romero, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Federal Awards Reports in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance June 30, 2020 74 eidebailly.com Federal Awards Reports in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance June 30, 2020 City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT 1 75 City of La Quinta, California Table of Contents June 30, 2020 Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards .................................................................................................................. 1 Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program; Report on Internal Control over Compliance; and Report on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance...................................................................................................................... 3 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ....................................................................................................... 6 Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ......................................................................................... 7 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Section I - Summary of Auditor’s Results .......................................................................................................... 8 Section II - Financial Statement Findings .......................................................................................................... 9 Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs ..............................................................................10 Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings..........................................................................................................11 76 What inspires you, inspires us. | eidebailly.com 19340 Jesse Ln., Ste. 260 | Riverside, CA 92508-5079 | T 951.367.3000 | F 951.367.3010 | EOE 1 Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards To the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of La Quinta, California We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of La Quinta, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements and have issued our report thereon dated December 23, 2020. Internal Control over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City 's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. 77 2 Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. Riverside, California December 23, 2020 78 What inspires you, inspires us. | eidebailly.com 19340 Jesse Ln., Ste. 260 | Riverside, CA 92508-5079 | T 951.367.3000 | F 951.367.3010 | EOE 3 Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program; Report on Internal Control over Compliance; and Report on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance To the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of La Quinta, California Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program We have audited the City of La Quinta, California’s (City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2020. The City’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Management’s Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its federal awards applicable to its federal programs. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the City’s major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Those standards and the Uniform Guidance require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City’s compliance. 79 4 Opinion on Each Major Federal Program In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2020. Report on Internal Control over Compliance Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City’s internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. 80 5 Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. We issued our report thereon dated December 23, 2020, which contained unmodified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the basic financial statements. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the Uniform Guidance and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. Riverside, California February 11, 2021 81 See Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 6 City of La Quinta, California Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended June 30, 2020 Pass-through Federal Entity Amounts Passed- CFDA Identifying Through to Number Number Expenditures Subrecipients U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster: Passed through the County of Riverside- Economic Development Agency: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 14.218 4.LQ.30-17 46,735$ 18,105$ Total Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Cluster 46,735 18,105 Total U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development 46,735 18,105 U.S. Department of Transportation Highway Planning and Construction Cluster: Passed through the State of California - Department of Transportation Highway Planning and Construction (Dune Palms Bridge)20.205 BRLKS-5433(014)633,360 - Highway Planning and Construction- Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)20.205 HSIPL-5433(015)107,826 - Highway Planning and Construction- Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)20.205 HSIPL-5433(017)1,791,503 - Highway Planning and Construction- Highway Bridge Program 20.205 BR-NBIL(547)6,506 - Total Highway Planning and Construction Cluster 2,539,195 - Total U.S. Department of Transportation 2,539,195 - U.S. Department of Homeland Security Passed through the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services: Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG)97.067 2015-SS-00078 3,194 - Total U.S. Department of Homeland Security 3,194 - 2,589,124$ 18,105$ Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor/Program or Cluster Title Total Federal Financial Assistance 82 7 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended June 30, 2020 Note 1 - Basis of Presentation The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of the City of La Quinta, California (City) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2020. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City. Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting for the governmental funds and the accrual basis of accounting for the proprietary funds, which is described in Note 1 of the City’s financial statements except for subrecipient expenditures, which are recorded on the cash basis. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Note 3 - Indirect Cost Rate The City has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. 83 8 City of La Quinta, California Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2020 Section I – Summary of Auditor’s Results FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Type of auditor's report issued Unmodified Internal control over financial reporting: Material weaknesses identified No Significant deficiencies identified not considered to be material weaknesses None Reported Noncompliance material to financial statements noted?No FEDERAL AWARDS Internal control over major program: Material weaknesses identified No Significant deficiencies identified not considered to be material weaknesses None Reported Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs:Unmodified Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.516:No Identification of major programs: CFDA Number Highway Planning and Construction Cluster 20.205 Dollar threshold used to distinguish between type A and type B programs:$ 750,000 Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee?Yes Name of Federal Program 84 9 City of La Quinta, California Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2020 Section II – Financial Statement Findings None Reported. 85 10 City of La Quinta, California Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2020 Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs None Reported. 86 11 City of La Quinta, California Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings Year Ended June 30, 2020 None Reported. 87 88 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CITYWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM IN LA QUINTA RECOMMENDATION Approve policies and procedures for a public safety camera system in La Quinta. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •In September 2016, the City Council formed an Ad-Hoc Committee (Committee) to assess the potential use of a public safety camera system (PSCS) to enhance public safety. •During the past four years, the Committee has held 32 community outreach meetings, conducted a pilot program with three firms, hired a firm to design a city-wide system, and funded the program as part of the 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program. •As part of the PSCS, Council directed staff to create policies and procedures to oversee the system. •Staff has presented an evolving draft to Council at two Study Sessions for discussion. •The latest version of the Draft Policies and Procedures (Attachment 1) incorporates public input and comments from Captain Lopez, and has been reviewed by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT – None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On September 20, 2016, the Council established the Committee to study the use of a PSCS as a tool for police, fire, and emergency responders. Since then, the Committee has conducted 28 community meetings; 2 focus groups, 2 community surveys; of those, 22 community meetings were during the 90- Day Pilot Program in 2019. In addition, staff has presented updates and information at 10 separate Council meetings; 4 study sessions, 1 business BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 89 session and provided 5 department reports. The most recent report was presented to Council on October 6, 2020. On March 6, 2018, Council asked staff to develop a draft set of Policies and Procedures to guide the PSCS that would address privacy concerns. On January 15, 2019, staff presented Council with draft policies and procedures for discussion. These were formulated after examining numerous cities’ governing policies and selected the best elements that would would be suitable for La Quinta’s needs. The policies were reviewed by the City’s insurance carrier, California Joint Powers Insurance Authority, and the City Attorney. At this meeting, Council directed staff to gather additional input from residents. Staff collected feedback during the 22 community meetings as part of the PSCS pilot program between March 1, 2019 to May 30, 2019. Based on the comments received, staff worked with the City Attorney to include residents’ comments, strengthen specific clauses to protect individual privacy rights, limit system access and establish a process for Council to authorize the use of technology related to license plate readers and face recognition. The latest version of the Draft Policies and Procedures (Attachment 1) incorporates comments from Captain Lopez, concerning the potential transmittal and use of recorded images for evidentiary purposes and has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Timetable: •January 15, 2019 – the first draft of Policies and Procedures presented to Council - draft based on other cities policies, and review by City’s insurance carrier and City Attorney. •June 18, 2019 – staff completed 90-Day Pilot Program and hosted 22 community meetings to gather community feedback on camera system and policies and procedures. •December 3, 2019 – staff presented the second draft of the Policies and Procedures, amended based on public input and review by City Attorney. •September 15, 2020 – staff provided the Policies and Procedures draft to council as part of the PSCS Update. At the October 6, 2020 meeting, staff indicated the cost of the system was the final piece needed before the Council determine whether or not to move forward with the system. Prior to awarding a contract, Council asked to review and approve the PSCS Policies and Procedures. Upon Council approval, the PSCS Policies and Procedures would be a governing document for the operation of the system. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to not approve the PSCS Policies and Procedures as presented or direct staff to make additional edits to the document. 90 Prepared by: Martha Mendez, Public Safety Manager Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director Attachment: 1. Draft Policies & Procedures for Public Safety Camera Systems 91 92 Page 5 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 11‐18‐2019) 249 Public Safety Camera System PURPOSE AND SCOPE The City of La Quinta and the La Quinta Police Department collectively operate, monitor, and maintain a Public Safety Camera System (PSCS) for the purpose of creating a safer environment for all those who live, work, and visit the City. The City and Police Department’s operation of a PSCS complements its anti- crime strategy to effectively allocate and deploy personnel, and to enhance public safety and security in public areas. POLICY This policy explains the purpose of the cameras and includes guidelines for their operation, for the storage of captured images by the City, and transmittal of captured images to law enforcement or other public agency for evidentiary purposes. Video monitoring in public places will be conducted in a legal and ethical manner while recognizing and protecting constitutional standards of privacy. PLACEMENT AND MONITORING These high definition cameras will be placed in strategic locations throughout the City to detect and deter crime, to help safeguard against potential threats to the public, to help manage emergency response situations during natural and man-made disasters and to assist City officials in providing services to the community. The City Manager or the authorized designee shall approve all proposed locations for the use of video monitoring technology and should consult with and be guided by legal counsel as necessary in making such determinations. Contributing factors shall be taken into consideration including but not limited to lighting, alignment of buildings, existing vegetation, or other obstructions when selecting camera placement. OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES Only City and/or department-approved video monitoring equipment shall be utilized. The La Quinta Police, La Quinta Fire, City staff, and vendors as approved by the City Manager, shall be authorized to view video monitoring equipment, and shall only examine public areas and activities where no reasonable expectation of privacy exists. 93 Page 6 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 11‐18‐2019) 249 SPECIFIC POLICIES A. The La Quinta Police and City staff shall comply with all Federal and California State law applicable to the use of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in public places. B. The technology will not be used to replace current policing techniques. C. Under no circumstances shall the PSCS be used for the purpose of infringing upon First Amendment and/or Fourth Amendment rights. D. Operators of the PSCS shall not target/observe individuals based solely on their race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability or other classifications protected by law. E. The La Quinta Police Department and City of La Quinta shall not use audio in conjunction with the PSCS unless appropriate court orders are obtained. F. When a residential property is clearly, and knowingly in alignment with the PSCS’s line of sight, black-out technology will be applied for privacy reasons to eliminate potential unintended intrusions. RECORDING AND USE The cameras shall only record images and not sound. Recorded images may be used for a variety of purposes, including criminal investigations and monitoring of activity of high-value or high-threat areas. The PSCS may be useful for the following purposes: A. To deter and identify criminal activity. B. To target identified areas of gang and narcotics complaints or activity. C. To respond to incidents. D. To assist in identifying, apprehending, and prosecuting offenders. E. To document officer and offender conduct during interactions to safeguard the rights of the public and officers. F. To augment resources in a cost-effective manner. G. To monitor pedestrian and vehicle traffic activity. Images from each camera shall be recorded in a manner consistent with the underlying purpose of the particular camera. Images shall be transmitted to monitors installed in a location approved by the City Manager or authorized designee. When activity warranting further investigation is reported or detected at any camera location, the available information shall be provided or made available to responding officers in a timely manner. The City Manager or authorized designee may approve video feeds from the PSCS to be viewed by police, fire, emergency management, public safety, or traffic management. Viewing by other staff or outside agencies will require 94 Page 7 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 11‐18‐2019) 249 authorization, including supervision by city staff. Unauthorized recording, viewing, reproduction, dissemination, or retention is prohibited. CAMERA NOTIFICATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH It is the City’s commitment to provide ample notification and public outreach with the PSCS. Signs will be placed in various locations notifying the public that a public safety camera system will be monitoring driving and pedestrian activities in public places. A map of all locations with cameras will be posted on the city website. Additionally, the City will provide regular updates and receive input from the public on the PSCS. INTEGRATION WITH OTHER TECHNOLOGY The Police Department and/or City of La Quinta may decide to integrate its PSCS with other technology to enhance available information. Systems such as gunshot detection, incident mapping, crime analysis, license plate recognition, facial recognition, and other video-based analytical systems may be considered based upon availability and the nature of Police Department strategy. Those additional technologies shall be approved by the City Council. Such approval by the Council will include at least one study session and one public hearing before the technology is added. VIDEO SUPERVISION The authorized designee shall oversee video monitoring access and usage to ensure members are within City of La Quinta and/or contract public safety personnel policy and applicable laws. The City Manager or authorized designee shall ensure such use and access is appropriately documented. VIDEO LOG A log shall be maintained at the designated video monitoring center. The log shall be used to document City personnel (La Quinta Police, La Quinta Fire, City staff, and vendors as approved by the City Manager) viewing or monitoring images provided by the PSCS. The logs at a minimum should record the: A. Date and time access was given. B. Name and agency of the person being provided access to the images. C. Name of person authorizing access. D. Identifiable portion of images viewed. The log shall record a request for, and shall record the transmittal of, any images to law enforcement or other public agency requested or required for evidentiary purposes. “For evidentiary purposes” or “for evidence” means for the purpose(s) of an official investigation, claim, or other legal proceeding, 95 Page 8 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 11‐18‐2019) 249 either criminal or civil, conducted by a law enforcement or other public agency with authority for such purpose. STORAGE AND RETENTION OF MEDIA All captured images that are downloaded to media shall be stored on a dedicated server in a secured area at a City of La Quinta facility with access restricted to authorized persons. A recording of images downloaded to media that is requested or required for evidentiary purposes shall be copied to a suitable medium and documented in the official log (above). The recording needed for evidentiary purposes shall be transmitted to law enforcement or other public agency and should be safely secured in accordance with that law enforcement or other public agency’s official policies and procedures for the retention of evidence. All actions taken by City personnel with respect to retention of media shall be appropriately documented. A checks and balance has been established where the recordings have limited built in authorizations for deletion of material at the Manager and Director level. Documentation of a reason for deletion is required in writing and is submitted from Supervisor level to the Manager, Director and City Manager level for authorization. The type of video monitoring technology employed and the manner in which recordings are used and stored by the City may affect retention periods. The recordings shall be stored and retained by the City at City facilities in accordance with the established records retention schedule for a minimum of one year, or such longer period as may be established by state law. Prior to destruction, written consent shall be obtained as in the ordinary course for destruction of City documents or records, before images that are downloaded to media stored on a dedicated server in a secured area at a City facility will be deleted or destroyed. If the City has stored images that are recordings for evidentiary purposes in any claim filed or any pending criminal or civil proceeding, they will be preserved until pending litigation is resolved (Government Code § 34090.6). EVIDENTIARY INTEGRITY All downloaded and retained media shall be treated in the same manner as other evidence. Media shall be accessed, maintained, stored and retrieved in a manner that ensures its integrity as evidence, including strict adherence to chain of custody requirements. Electronic trails, including encryption, digital masking of innocent or uninvolved individuals to preserve anonymity, authenticity certificates and date and time stamping, shall be used as appropriate to preserve individual rights and to ensure the authenticity and maintenance of a secure evidentiary chain of custody. 96 Page 9 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 11‐18‐2019) 249 RELEASE OF VIDEO IMAGES All recorded video images gathered by the PSCS are for the official use of the City of La Quinta and its authorized agencies. Requests for recorded video images from the public or the media shall be processed in the same manner as requests for City public records consistent with the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.). TRAINING All staff members authorized to operate or access PSCS shall receive appropriate training on an annual basis. Training shall include guidance on the use of cameras, and a review regarding relevant policies and procedures, including this policy. Training shall also address state and federal law related to the use of video monitoring equipment and privacy. VIDEO MONITORING AUDIT The City Manager or other authorized designee will conduct an annual review of the PSCS. The review shall include: A. Analysis of the cost, benefit and effectiveness of the system. B. Any public safety issues that were effectively addressed. C. Any significant prosecutions that resulted. D. Any systemic operational or administrative issues that were identified, including those related to training, discipline or policy. E. Retention of Longitudinal Data to be able to evaluate trends, costs, apprehensions, on a long-term basis. The results of each review shall be appropriately documented and maintained by the City Manager or authorized designee and other applicable advisory bodies. Any recommendations for training or policy should be promptly and reasonably addressed. VIOLATIONS OF POLICY The City has zero tolerance for any violation of these policies. Should a violation occur, the City will take appropriate action per the City of La Quinta Personnel Policies or applicable state/federal law. 97 98 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROPRIATE FUNDING AND AWARD CONTRACT TO CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITYWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM PROJECT NO. 2020-03 RECOMMENDATION Appropriate $372,296 from the Public Safety Fund; award a contract to Convergint Technologies in the amount up to $1,211,296 to construct the Citywide Public Safety Camera System Project No. 2020-03; and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The full Public Safety Camera System (PSCS) scope proposes to place a total of 105 new cameras at the following locations: (Attachment 1) Base Bid - All Signalized and Major Roundabout Intersections: 58 Base Bid - Fritz Burns Park: 4 Base Bid - La Quinta Park: 5 Base Bid - City Hall: 13 Additive Alternate - Wellness Center: 6 Additive Alternate - Library: 5 Additive Alternate – Additional Camera at La Quinta Park: 1 Additive Alternate - La Quinta Museum and Lumber Yard: 8 Additive Alternate – Sports Complex: 4 Additive Alternate – Eisenhower Drive and Calle Sinaloa: 1 •Convergint Technologies of Orange, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $1,211,290 (Attachment 2). FISCAL IMPACT This project is allocated in the 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and is budgeted in the Public Safety Fund. Additional funding will be available in the Public Safety Fund. The following is the project budget: Original Budget Base Bid Only Revised Budget Base Bid Plus Add Alternates Revised Budget Professional: $ 20,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Construction: $ 938,000 $ 1,057,103 $ 1,211,296 Contingency: $ 32,000 $ 106,000 $ 121,000 Total Budget: $ 1,000,000 $ 1,203,103 $ 1,372,296 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 99 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the January 15, 2019 meeting, the Council directed Staff to proceed with a pilot program of the public safety camera system. At the June 18, 2019 Council meeting Staff presented the findings of the pilot program. On December 3, 2019 Council directed Staff to retain Convergint Technologies to prepare design exhibits and scope specifications. On October 6, 2020 during the request to approve PS&E, Council directed Staff to move City Hall to the base bid from additive alternates and directed Staff to add the Sports Complex and Museum/Lumber Yard as additive alternates. On December 15, 2020 staff solicited construction bids from qualified contractors. The City received 5 bids on January 27, 2021. The Convergint Technologies of Orange, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $1,211,290. The following is a summary of the areas and associated construction cost: Base Bid -Intersections, Fritz Burns Park, La Quinta Park, and City Hall $1,057,103 Additive Alternate 01- Wellness Center $ 23,588 Additive Alternate 02- Library $ 21,305 Additive Alternate 03– La Quinta Park $ 13,281 Additive Alternate 04- La Quinta Museum and Lumber Yard $ 45,083 Additive Alternate 05– Sports Complex $ 33,078 Additive Alternate 06– Calle Sinaloa and Eisenhower $ 17,858 Grand Total $1,211,296 Contingent upon award of the project on February 16, 2021, the following is the project schedule: Council Considers Project Award February 16, 2021 Execute Contract and Mobilize February 17 to April 5, 2021 Construction (60 Working Days) April 2021 to June 2021 Accept Improvements July 2021 ALTERNATIVES Council may choose to select any combination of base bid and additive alternates, or may choose to reject all bids. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/ City Engineer Attachments: 1.Project Vicinity Map 2.Bid Comparison Summary 100 332040910542141141535361832295217305428271913326768313725241212533823474849505111424645341644224339AVENIDA BERMUDASCALLE TECATEAVENIDA MONTEZUMA CALLE SINALOACALLE TAMPICOJEFFERSON STREET JEFFERSON STREET AVENUE 54MADISON STREET AIRPORT BOULEVARDEISENHOWER DRIVEAVENUE 52PARK AVENUE WASHINGTON STREET AVENUE 48AVENUE 49WASHINGTON STREETAVENUE 47BLACKHAWK WAYADAMS STREET MILES AVENUEFRED WARING DRIVEHIGHWAY 111AVENUE 50DUNE PALMS ROADSILVERROCK WAYDESERT CLUB DRIVE 555657P1P2F1-3F4F5NOTE: IMAGES NOTDRAWN TO SCALEEXISTING INTERSECTIONPROPOSED CAMERA LOCATIONAT INTERSECTIONPARK/FACILITYTOTAL CAMERAS:BASE BID - 80ADDITIVE ALTERNATE - 25OVERALL - 105Project Vicinity MapATTACHMENT 1ATTACHMENT 1101 102 Bid Opening Date: 1/25/2021 Citywide Public Safety Camera City Project No. 2020-03 Attachment 2 - Bid Comparison Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 234,413.62$ 234,413.62$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 2 Dust Control LS 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3 Traffic Control LS 1 64,000.00$ 64,000.00$ 109,400.00$ 109,400.00$ 13,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 4 Furnish and Install Camera System at Fritz Burns Park LS 1 32,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 52,877.04$ 52,877.04$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 78,000.00$ 78,000.00$ 56,000.00$ 56,000.00$ 110,000.00$ 110,000.00$ 5 Furnish and Install Camera System at La Quinta Park LS 1 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 38,274.38$ 38,274.38$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 92,000.00$ 92,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 94,000.00$ 94,000.00$ 6 Furnish and Install Camera System at City Hall LS 1 104,000.00$ 104,000.00$ 45,135.03$ 45,135.03$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 135,000.00$ 135,000.00$ 215,000.00$ 215,000.00$ 180,000.00$ 180,000.00$ 7 Furnish and Install Camera System at Intersections LS 1 $ 464,000.00 $ 464,000.00 $ 307,810.86 307,810.86$ $325,000.00 325,000.00$ $603,025.00 $ 603,025.00 $ 488,000.00 $ 488,000.00 $ 707,000.00 $ 707,000.00 8 System Integration LS 1 160,000.00$ 160,000.00$ 159,813.47$ 159,813.47$ 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 336,400.00$ 336,400.00$ 268,000.00$ 268,000.00$ 202,000.00$ 202,000.00$ 9 As-Built Plans LS 1 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 10,113.60$ 10,113.60$ 37,820.62$ 37,820.62$ 32,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10 Maintenance Contract LS 1 120,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 96,764.61$ 96,764.61$ 32,477.21$ 32,477.21$ 85,000.00$ 85,000.00$ 299,000.00$ 299,000.00$ 240,000.00$ 240,000.00$ 1,080,000.00$ 1,057,102.61$ 1,210,297.83$ 1,384,925.00$ 1,400,500.00$ 1,611,000.00$ Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 6,124.60$ 6,124.60$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2 Traffic Control LS 1 200.00$ 200.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 Furnish and Install Camera System at Wellness Center LS 1 32,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 15,748.96$ 15,748.96$ 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 38,000.00$ 38,000.00$ 58,000.00$ 58,000.00$ 71,000.00$ 71,000.00$ 4 System Integration LS 1 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 595.88$ 595.88$ 2,567.68$ 2,567.68$ 1,560.00$ 1,560.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 36,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 5 As-Built Plans LS 1 600.00$ 600.00$ 398.56$ 398.56$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 6 Maintenance Contract LS 1 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 720.00$ 720.00$ 5,412.87$ 5,412.87$ 2,350.00$ 2,350.00$ 44,000.00$ 44,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 50,800.00$ 23,588.00$ 27,980.55$ 48,310.00$ 108,100.00$ 154,000.00$ Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,520.34$ 5,520.34$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2 Traffic Control LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 Furnish and Install Camera System at Wellness Center LS 1 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 14,195.14$ 14,195.14$ 17,034.16$ 17,034.16$ 37,000.00$ 37,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 61,000.00$ 61,000.00$ 4 System Integration LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 595.88$ 595.88$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,350.00$ 2,350.00$ 1,400.00$ 1,400.00$ 36,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 5 As-Built Plans LS 1 750.00$ 750.00$ 393.32$ 393.32$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 800.00$ 800.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 6 Maintenance Contract LS 1 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 600.00$ 600.00$ 5,412.87$ 5,412.87$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 34,000.00$ 34,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 64,250.00$ 21,304.68$ 26,447.03$ 51,150.00$ 70,000.00$ 144,000.00$ Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3,549.73$ 3,549.73$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2 Dust Control LS 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ -$ -$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 Traffic Control LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 Furnish and Install Camera System at La Quinta Park for additional 360-Degree Exterior Camera with connection LS 1 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 9,127.89$ 9,127.89$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 19,000.00$ 19,000.00$ 5 System Integration LS 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 168.24$ 168.24$ 1,035.42$ 1,035.42$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 2,150.00$ 2,150.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 6 As-Built Plans LS 1 150.00$ 150.00$ 112.14$ 112.14$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 200.00$ 200.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 7 Maintenance Contract LS 1 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 323.67$ 323.67$ 5,412.87$ 5,412.87$ 600.00$ 600.00$ 7,200.00$ 7,200.00$ 42,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 15,650.00$ 13,281.67$ 10,448.29$ 28,700.00$ 34,350.00$ 68,000.00$ Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 11,467.47$ 11,467.47$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2 Dust Control LS 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 Traffic Control LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 Furnish and Install Camera System at Museum and Lumber Yard LS 1 64,000.00$ 64,000.00$ 29,487.79$ 29,487.79$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 76,520.00$ 76,520.00$ 65,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 114,000.00$ 114,000.00$ 5 System Integration LS 1 16,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 1,688.24$ 1,688.24$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,900.00$ 2,150.00$ 2,150.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 6 As-Built Plans LS 1 1,200.00$ 1,200.00$ 844.50$ 844.50$ 1,328.74$ 1,328.74$ 1,200.00$ 1,200.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 7 Maintenance Contract LS 1 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,594.83$ 1,594.83$ 5,412.87$ 5,412.87$ 4,700.00$ 4,700.00$ 55,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 104,200.00$ 45,082.83$ 40,741.61$ 93,820.00$ 125,250.00$ 212,000.00$ Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 8,599.23$ 8,599.23$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2 Dust Control LS 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 Traffic Control LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 Furnish and Install Camera System at Sports Complex LS 1 32,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 22,112.29$ 22,112.29$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 69,000.00$ 69,000.00$ 5 System Integration LS 1 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 618.24$ 618.24$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,350.00$ 2,350.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6 As-Built Plans LS 1 600.00$ 600.00$ 618.24$ 618.24$ 2,834.94$ 2,834.94$ 800.00$ 800.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 7 Maintenance Contract LS 1 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 1,130.00$ 1,130.00$ 5,412.87$ 5,412.87$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 53,600.00$ 33,078.00$ 27,747.81$ 68,650.00$ 74,200.00$ 122,000.00$ Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3,800.75$ 3,800.75$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2 Dust Control LS 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 Traffic Control LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,205.88$ 2,205.88$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 Furnish and Install 360-Degree Combination Camera with Radio Connection to Camera System EA 1 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 9,773.37$ 9,773.37$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 29,000.00$ 29,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 5 System Integration LS 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 653.88$ 653.88$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6 As-Built Plans LS 1 150.00$ 150.00$ 654.12$ 654.12$ 966.66$ 966.66$ 200.00$ 200.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 7 Maintenance Contract LS 1 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 770.00$ 770.00$ 5,412.87$ 5,412.87$ 600.00$ 600.00$ 7,200.00$ 7,200.00$ 42,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 15,650.00$ 17,858.00$ 20,379.53$ 37,700.00$ 36,400.00$ 77,000.00$ 1,384,150.00$ 1,211,295.79$ 1,364,042.65$ 1,713,255.00$ 1,848,800.00$ 2,388,000.00$ 1,080,000.00$ 1,057,102.61$ 1,210,297.83$ 1,384,925.00$ 1,400,500.00$ 1,611,000.00$ 1,130,800.00$ 1,080,690.61$ 1,238,278.38$ 1,433,235.00$ 1,508,600.00$ 1,765,000.00$ 1,144,250.00$ 1,078,407.29$ 1,236,744.86$ 1,436,075.00$ 1,470,500.00$ 1,755,000.00$ 1,095,650.00$ 1,070,384.28$ 1,220,746.12$ 1,413,625.00$ 1,434,850.00$ 1,679,000.00$ 1,184,200.00$ 1,102,185.44$ 1,251,039.44$ 1,478,745.00$ 1,525,750.00$ 1,823,000.00$ 1,133,600.00$ 1,090,180.61$ 1,238,045.64$ 1,453,575.00$ 1,474,700.00$ 1,733,000.00$ 1,095,650.00$ 1,074,960.61$ 1,230,677.36$ 1,422,625.00$ 1,436,900.00$ 1,688,000.00$ Miscalculations and rounding errors Base Bid with Alternate No. 3: Base Bid with Alternate No. 4: Base Bid with Alternate No. 5: Base Bid with Alternate No. 6: Base Bid with Alternate No. 1: Base Bid with Alternate No. 2: Bid Alternate No. 3 - La Quinta Park Sub-Total Bid Alternate No. 3: Bid Alternate No. 4 - La Quinta Museum and Lumber Yard Sub-Total Bid Alternate No. 4: Bid Alternate No. 5 - Sports Complex Sub-Total Bid Alternate No. 5: Bid Alternate No. 6 - Calle Sinaloa and Eisenhower Sub-Total Bid Alternate No. 6: Engineer's Estimate - Base Bid Base Bid Only Elecnor Belco Electric Inc. Inter-Pacific Inc. Convergint Technologies DBX Inc. Crosstown Electrical & Data Inc. Bid Alternate No. 2 - La Quinta Library Sub-Total Bid Alternate No. 2: Bid Alternate No. 1 - La Quinta Wellness Center Sub-Total Bid Alternate No. 1: Sub-Total Base Bid: Grand Total Base Bid Including Alternate Nos. 1 - 6: ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 2103 104 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PRELIMINARY DESIGN OPTION AND APPROPRIATE MEASURE G RESERVE FUNDING FOR THE SILVERROCK RETENTION BASIN SOIL STABILIZATION PROJECT NO. 2020-07 RECOMMENDATION Approve preliminary design option and appropriate Measure G Reserve funding in the amount of $427,250 for the SilverRock Retention Basin Soil Stabilization Project No. 2020-07. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •On November 4, 2020, the Financial Advisory Commission (FAC) formed a SilverRock Venue Site FAC Subcommittee (Subcommittee) to perform review and analysis of the SilverRock Phase II priorities with staff. •The SilverRock Retention Basin Soil Stabilization Project (Soil Stabilization Project) (Attachment 1) was identified as a priority improvement by the Subcommittee, FAC and Council. •At the December 1, 2020 City Council meeting Measure G funding was appropriated in the amount of $10,000 for preliminary design. •Hermann Design Group (Consultant) prepared four preliminary design options for consideration (Attachment 2). Staff and the FAC recommend funding appropriation in the amount of $427,250 for option 4. •Option 4 entails adding shrubs to upper half of slope on Avenue 52 and along parking area and planting a hydroseed mix with rotor irrigation on the balance of the slopes. FISCAL IMPACT Measure G Reserve funding is requested in the amount of $427,250 for the Soil Stabilization Project. The following is the existing budget and proposed total project budget: BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 105 Current Budget Proposed Budget Predesign $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Design $ 0 $ 20,000 Professional $ 0 $ 23,250 Construction $ 0 $ 300,000 Utility Allowance $ 0 $ 15,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey $ 0 $ 29,250 Contingency $ 0 $ 39,750 Total Budget: $ 10,000 $ 437,250 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 4, 2020, the FAC discussed the proposed SilverRock Venue Site Project Phase II improvements and prioritization. During this meeting, the FAC requested the formation of an FAC SilverRock Venue Site Subcommittee to further review and provide recommendations on any future Phase II improvements and additional appropriation of Measure G funds. Commissioners Mills, Way, and Rosen were appointed to the Subcommittee. The Soil Stabilization Project was identified as a priority improvement, and Council appropriated Measure G funds in the amount of $10,000 at the December 1, 2020 meeting to complete the preliminary design. The Consultant prepared four preliminary design options for consideration. Staff and the FAC recommend design option 4 as the most efficient and cost- effective option. The improvements in option 4 include: •The east slope remaining in its current natural state; •Adding shrubs to upper half of slope on Avenue 52 and along parking area, and; •Utilizing a hydroseed mix with rotor irrigation on the balance of the slopes. The proposed project budget for the Soil Stabilization Project is $437,250. Measure G funding appropriation is requested in the amount of $427,250, excluding the previously appropriated $10,000 from the overall project budget for preliminary design. ALTERNATIVES Council could elect to select an alternative design option. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1.Project Vicinity Map 2.Preliminary Design Options 106 ATTACHMENT 1SILVERROCK RETENTION BASIN SOIL STABILIZATION PROJECT VICINITY MAP 107 108 OPTION 1 SILVERROCK RETENTION BASIN SOIL STABILIZATION PROJECT PRELIMINARY DESIGN OPTIONS ATTACHMENT 2 109 OPTION 2 110 OPTION 3 111 OPTION 4: RECOMMENDED 112 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 MID-YEAR BUDGET REPORT, APPROVE THE RECOMMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS, AND DESIGNATE RESERVE FUNDING ALLOCATIONS RECOMMENDATION Receive and file fiscal year 2020/21 Mid-Year Budget Report; approve the recommended budget adjustments, and designate reserve funding allocations. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2020/21 Mid-Year Budget Report (Attachment 1) provides an update of the City’s fiscal activities from July to December 2020. The Mid-Year Budget Report includes revenue and expenditure adjustments in 19 funds. Staff recommends allocating $5,000,000 of General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance to Committed Reserves. FISCAL IMPACT Staff recommended adjustments in 19 funds are: BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 4 113 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Throughout the fiscal year each Department monitors their budget and proposes adjustments to reflect current conditions and ongoing operational needs. Requests are reviewed and discussed by the City Manager and Directors before recommendations are presented in the Budget Report (Attachment 1). Funds with no adjustments have been excluded. ALTERNATIVES Council could delay, modify, or reject the requested budget amendments. Prepared by: Karla Romero, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. 2020/21 Mid-Year Budget Report Fund #Fund Name Revenues Expenses 101 General Fund 3,964,434$ 456,564$ 501 Facility & Fleet Replacement Fund - 60,000 502 Information Technology Fund 25,800 - 504 Insurance Fund - 77,000 201 Gas Tax Fund 13,400 - 202 Library and Museum Fund (1,300) 23,000 221 AB 939 Cal Recycle Fund - 150,000 223 Measure A Fund 200,000 - 226 Emergency Management Performance Grant Fund 7,600 7,600 235 So. Coast Air Quality Fund - 6,700 244 Housing Grants Fund 60,000 60,000 247 Economic Development Fund 109,100 169,100 255 Street Facility DIF Fund (15,000) - 256 Park Facility DIF Fund (6,600) - 259 Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund 21,600 - 270 Art in Public Places Fund 10,000 15,000 401 Capital Improvement Project Fund 15,000 15,000 761 CERBT OPEB Trust Fund 15,000 - 762 PARS Pension Trust Fund 300,000 - TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS ALL FUNDS 4,719,034$ 1,039,964$ 114 Fiscal Year 2020/21 Second Quarter Budget Report SUMMARY Quarterly budget reports are presented to provide ongoing oversight of public funds, relate current and upcoming activities, and request funding adjustments. The 2020/21 budget was adopted with a conservative outlook on the economy. We acknowledged constant vigilance would be required, adjustments were inevitable, and we are grateful they are generally positive. Ongoing pandemic restrictions and health and safety regulations will continue to shape future revenue sources, but our economy has proven to be more resilient and adaptive than previously anticipated. The revenue adjustments presented in this mid-year budget report are anticipated to carry forward to the next fiscal year with a continued gradual recovery to pre-pandemic levels. Having reduced services early and decisively at the beginning of the pandemic has saved the City valuable resources. Several processes have been streamlined and become paperless in a highly virtual environment. Available infrastructure has been repurposed to produce personal protective equipment at the Library’s MakerSpace, provide a COVID testing site at the Wellness Center, and childcare services for frontline responders at the La Quinta Museum. Employee ingenuity has been at an all-time high, with staff continuing to thrive and collaborate in order to provide essential services to the community. Due to ongoing economic volatility, the 2020/21 First Quarter Budget Report had no recommended adjustments, however, this 2020/21 Mid- Year Budget Report has several, which are detailed in Exhibits 1 and 2. The recommended adjustments are largely derived from year to date revenues collected and expenses incurred, program activities, the continued closure of facilities, and additional COVID related implementation guidelines. ATTACHMENT 1 115 GENERAL FUND REVENUES The largest of the revenue adjustments are focused on the top three General Fund revenue sources, which are property taxes, sales taxes, and transient (hotel) occupancy taxes (TOT). Property Taxes - On May 27, 2020, the California Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District issued a decision in the case of City of Chula Vista v. Sandoval, et al. As a result of this court decision, on January 4, 2021, the City was notified by the County of Riverside Office of the Auditor-Controller of an approximate $800,000 reduction in Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) payments for the current fiscal year. The Auditor-Controller has confirmed they do not anticipate a retroactive adjustment for the statutory limit of three years, but rather the adjustment would be applied from this point forward. The noticed received from the Auditor-Controller is attached as Exhibit 3. Sales Taxes - Sales tax revenues have been stronger than anticipated, partially because of a lag in the reporting, collecting, and remittance of prior fiscal year revenues which were received after the accrual period (ending on August 30, 2020) and therefore recorded as revenues in the current fiscal year. Last year’s implementation of the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision which now requires out-of-state retailers to collect and remit local taxes on online sales and customers temporarily shifting their purchasing power because of pandemic restrictions to more spending on taxable goods have both contributed to increased sales tax revenues. Notwithstanding another unanticipated severe economic impact, revised projections estimate the City could receive an additional $2,500,000 in sales tax revenue by year-end; of this amount $1,000,000 is derived from the State sales tax rate and $1,500,000 is derived from local Measure G sales taxes, which will increase the current fiscal year Measure G reserve contribution to $4,627,200. 116 TOT - An adjustment is not recommended for hotel TOT because of the complete closure of the La Quinta Resort during the Summer of 2020 pandemic travel restrictions, and decreased business travel with work now being conducted online. Reduced hotel TOT revenues are anticipated to be partially offset by the December opening of the 108-suite Residence Inn by Marriott hotel. Current Short-Term Vacation Rental (STVR) revenue projections are $757,345 lower than actual revenues received in the prior fiscal year and $1,395,926 lower than fiscal year 2018/19. In addition, when (STVR) revenues were budgeted we did not anticipate an increase in the local drive market seeking to retreat from larger congested cities or traveling families with children and pets seeking accommodations for work and school. The implementation of online reporting has also facilitated the timely remittance of TOT revenues. The recommended increase of $1,500,000 is based on revenues collected during the first six months of the fiscal year and moderate activity for the remainder of the fiscal year. Licenses and Permits – An increase of $50,000 in STVR registration fees is recommended based on current year to date activity. Revised projections are approximately $112,000 lower than last fiscal year actuals, which is reflective of the current STVR permit moratorium. Charges for Services – Recreation programs, special events, group sports, and large events have been non-existent and are now anticipated to resume next fiscal year. The Wellness Center has been closed for health and wellness activities and memberships are anticipated to be extended for the time the facility has been closed. Combined, these revenues would be reduced by $210,500. Fines and Other Taxes – False alarm fees have been suspended during the pandemic in part because of their negative economic impact on businesses and the community, and as a result a reduction of $26,000 is recommended. Staff has focused their efforts on education and sending notifications about false alarms. Overall, there has been a decrease in false alarms when compared to last year, indicating efforts keep generating positive results. 117 Document transfer taxes are paid when properties or large equipment is sold. Despite the pandemic, the detached single-family (DSF) home sales in La Quinta for 2020 surpassed DSF sales in 2019. An increase of $350,000 is recommended which would increase the total budget by $187,500 over last fiscal year’s actuals. One-Time Revenues – One-time revenues are derived from state and federal COVID-19 relief funds. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES) Act funds have been received in the amount of $502,034. On January 21, 2021 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) announced it would retroactively increase FEMA eligible expenses for state and local governments to 100% from the standard 75%, based on this rate the reimbursement is anticipated to be $98,900. At this time, no further COVID-19 relief funds are anticipated. All revenue projections will continue to be monitored during the Spring of 2021 and an additional update shall be provided during the 2020/21 Third Quarter Budget Report. EXPENSES As noted in the FY 2019/20 General Fund Year-End Budget Report, increased carryovers from expense savings were recommended because of the continued volatility in reopening the economy, which impacts City operations. This is also contributing to the condensed recommended expense adjustments in this report. One-Time Expenses – One-time expenses are limited to COVID-19 related expenses. A $75,000 increase reflects current fiscal year expenses but does not fully represent all incurred pandemic response expenses, such as additional janitorial services which are added in other expense accounts. In addition, FEMA eligible expenses are limited to a timeframe from March 13, 2020 to September 14, 2020; after this date updated guidelines resulted in city expenses no longer being eligible for FEMA reimbursement. Design and Development – During the pandemic, online payments have increased dramatically. An increase of $80,000 is reflective of both credit card and e-check fees. When the 2020/21 budget was adopted, the GIS consultant was eliminated from the budget to reduce expenses. However, during the last several months this service has been increasingly desired for zoning, general plan and specific plan maps, as well as to support the STVR program, therefore an increase of $45,000 is requested. 118 Community Resources – With the continuing spread of COVID-19, a new emergency temporary standard (ETS) protecting employees in most worksites was recently approved by Cal-OSHA. This new ETS extends an existing safety standard for medical and emergency responders to most workplaces, including non-emergency municipal personnel. As a result, Human Resources has contracted for professional services to implement Cal-OSHA guidelines, COVID-19 compliance requirements, and contact tracing; a $20,000 increase is recommended to continue these efforts. The current budget of $1,000 has been exhausted for lot abatements and cleaning. A budget increase of $4,000 is recommended to continue these efforts. Public Works – An increase of $35,000 for Fritz Burns Pool maintenance is requested to repair the pool deck and replace torn shade covers and outdated controllers for pool equipment. These repairs would be completed in the Spring of 2021. Janitorial services have increased due to additional deep cleaning and sanitations at all city facilities, therefore an increase of $50,000 is requested. Accidents involving city property are unpredictable and therefore not budgeted, however, based on current expenses a budget adjustment of $10,000 is recommended. When possible, the City shall continue to seek reimbursement for these damages. Marketing – An increase of $28,500 is requested to fulfill the contractual obligation under the Joint Powers Agreement with the Greater Palm Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau (GPSCVB), which is based on TOT revenues received by member agencies. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (ISF) ISF are used to account for activities involved in rendering services to departments within the City. Adjustments are recommended for three of the four ISF. Expense adjustments would be funded from available fund balances in each Fund. 119 Facility and Fleet Replacement Fund – The City has been reevaluating lease versus purchases for vehicle replacements. Vehicles with a useful life of over 5 years may be more cost effective to purchase depending on their intended use. Currently two vehicles have been identified as highly priority for an immediate replacement. These 2006 and 2008 vehicles have exhausted their useful life. Additional vehicles are needed for two vacant positions a Code Officer and a Building Inspector. The recommended budget increase of $60,000 would allow for the purchase and retrofitting of two vehicles in the current year. Additional requests would be included in the 2021/22 budget. Information Technology Fund – The City’s computer leases have ended and new computers are being purchased rather than leased. The lease agreement terms included an escrow account refund in the amount of $25,800, which have been received. Insurance Fund – A $77,000 adjustment is needed to account for the earthquake insurance premium from February 2021 to June 2021. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds account for specific revenues and their related expenditures that are legally required to be held in separate funds. Revenues are derived from developer impact fees, property tax assessments, State and Federal programs, housing income, or operations. These restricted funds are for road repairs, recycling programs, art in public places, housing activities, police programs, and the administration of retiree benefits through trusts. Expense adjustments without matching revenue adjustments would be funded from available fund balances in each Fund. Gas Tax Fund – In January of each year the State provides agencies with updated gas tax revenue projects, therefore, an increase of $13,400 is recommended to reflect this update. Library and Museum Fund – The MakerSpace has been closed since March 2020 and is not anticipated to fully reopen before June, therefore a reduction of $1,300 in membership fees is recommended. The Library has reopened with limited use and therefore additional janitorial services are required. In addition, the Museum required additional cleaning while operating a day care. Combined janitorial services would increase by $8,000 for these two facilities. 120 In the Summer of 2020, the Museum experienced HVAC issues which resulted in additional repairs and a unit was stolen which was replaced, therefore an increase of $15,000 is needed. AB 939 Cal Recycle Fund – An expense increase of $150,000 is requested to implement a business recycling campaign. The campaign would include the distribution of organic recycling barrels and public education. Measure A Fund – Based on stronger than anticipated sales tax revenues a positive revenue adjustment of $200,000 is recommended in the Measure A Fund, which is restricted for road improvements. Emergency Management Performance Grant Fund – Proposed revenue and expense adjustments of $7,600 would recognize grant funds for the current fiscal year. These funds were used to purchase a trailer and generator for emergency preparedness. South Coast Air Quality Fund – An increase of $6,700 is requested to recognize an incurred final expense for the installation of six electric vehicle charging station located at Highway 111 and Washington Street and La Quinta Park. Housing Grants Fund - Proposed revenue and expense adjustments of $60,000 would recognize grant funds for the current fiscal year. These funds are being used for the housing element update. Economic Development Fund – A revenue an expense increase of $109,100 recognizes CARES Act funds used for Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Programs and a $60,000 marketing and tourism increase recognized ongoing COVID-19 related marketing efforts. Development Impact Fee (DIF) Funds – Adjustments are recommended in three DIF Funds. An updated DIF Study was adopted on February 4, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020. This DIF Study phased out the Street Facility DIF and the Park Facility DIF and replaced these fees with one Maintenance Facilities DIF fee. In early FY 2020/21, residual revenues were collected for the two phased out fees from permits issued under the prior fee schedule and new fees were collected in the Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund. As a result, revenue budgets adjusted are recommended in these three Funds to reallocate budgets totaling $21,600. Art in Public Places (APP) Fund – A recommended increase of $10,000 in APP fees is based on current activity and a $15,000 expense increase is 121 recommended for an art mural installation at the SilverRock event site restroom. The $15,000 increase would also be recognized as revenue and an expense in the Capital Improvement Fund for this project. CERBT OPEB and PARS Pension Trust Funds – The City has two trust funds for retiree benefits one with California Employer’s Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) for Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) and one with Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) for pension benefits. Both trusts have been earning a greater interest returns than originally anticipated and therefore an increase of $15,000 is recommended for the OPEB Trust and $300,000 for the Pension Trust. GENERAL FUND RESERVES General Fund reserve balances were discussed during the 2019/20 General Fund Fiscal Year-End Budget Report and confirmed in the 2019/20 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Reserve Policy requires an annual review of reserves and funding levels during the mid-year budget process. Reserve funding generally comes from excess revenues over expenditures including one-time revenue and may be allocated to reserves as directed by Council until target levels are reached. Once all targets are funded, funds will remain in unassigned fund balance. The following is a summary of committed reserves as of June 30, 2020. The current Economic Disaster balance of $6,800,000 does not include the $500,000 allocated in the current fiscal year for Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Programs. Staff has prepared three reserve funding options for Council discussion and consideration. Each option allocates $5,000,000 from unassigned fund balance to committed reserves. 122 Summary of Committed Reserves and Funding Options Funding Options Options 1 and 2 partially fund the two deficit balance reserve categories. Option 3 fully funds the Economic Disaster reserve, leaving one partially unfunded reserve category (Capital Replacement). The following illustrate how each option would impact the reserve balances. Council may choose a funding option presented, alter the amount allocated but use an allocation method presented, request additional alternatives, or not allocate additional funds to reserves. Reserve Category Current Target Surplus/(Deficit) Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Cash Flow Reserve 5,000,000 5,000,000 - Natural Disaster Reserve 10,000,000 10,000,000 - - - - Economic Disaster 6,800,000 11,000,000 (4,200,000) 2,500,000 2,741,514 4,200,000 Capital Replacement Reserve 6,540,000 10,000,000 (3,460,000) 2,500,000 2,258,486 800,000 Pension Trust Benefits 10,249,738 10,000,000 249,738 - - - 38,589,738 46,000,000 (7,410,262) 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Unassigned Fund Balance 19,094,653 (5,000,000) (5,000,000) (5,000,000) Option One: Evenly distribute an allocation to each deficit reserve balance. Option Two: Distribute an allocation to each category on a weighted basis, with the largest unfunded category receiving the largest amount. Option Three: Fully fund the Economic Disaster Reserve and partially fund Capital Replacement Reserves. Reserve Category Option 1 Target Surplus/(Deficit) Cash Flow Reserve 5,000,000 5,000,000 - Natural Disaster Reserve 10,000,000 10,000,000 - Economic Disaster 9,300,000 11,000,000 (1,700,000) Capital Replacement Reserve 9,040,000 10,000,000 (960,000) Pension Trust Benefits 10,249,738 10,000,000 249,738 43,589,738 46,000,000 (2,410,262) Reserve Category Option 2 Target Surplus/(Deficit) Cash Flow Reserve 5,000,000 5,000,000 - Natural Disaster Reserve 10,000,000 10,000,000 - Economic Disaster 9,541,514 11,000,000 (1,458,486) Capital Replacement Reserve 8,798,486 10,000,000 (1,201,514) Pension Trust Benefits 10,249,738 10,000,000 249,738 43,589,738 46,000,000 (2,410,262) Reserve Category Option 3 Target Surplus/(Deficit) Cash Flow Reserve 5,000,000 5,000,000 - Natural Disaster Reserve 10,000,000 10,000,000 - Economic Disaster 11,000,000 11,000,000 - Capital Replacement Reserve 7,340,000 10,000,000 (2,660,000) Pension Trust Benefits 10,249,738 10,000,000 249,738 43,589,738 46,000,000 (2,410,262) 123 124 City of La Quinta FY 2019/20 Recommended Second Quarter Budget Adjustments Exhibit 1 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses FINANCE Top 3 Revenue Sources 101-0000-40315 Property Taxes - RPTTF Pass Through (800,000) 101-0000-41320 State Sales Taxes 1,000,000 101-0000-41326 Measure G Sales Taxes 1,500,000 101-0000-41401 TOT - Short-Term Vacation Rentals 1,500,000 Licenses and Permits 101-0000-41415 STVR Registration Fee 50,000 Charges for Services 101-0000-42200 Leisure Enrichment (26,000) 101-0000-42202 Gift Shop (3,000) 101-0000-42210 Youth Sports (27,000) 101-0000-42211 Adult Sports (3,600) 101-0000-42212 Facility Rental (20,000) 101-0000-42213 Special Events (12,000) 101-0000-42214 Wellness Center Leisure Events (30,000) 101-0000-42216 Senior Center Special Events (900) 101-0000-42218 Wellness Center Memberships (88,000) Fines and Other Taxes 101-0000-42709 False Alarms - Police (20,000) 101-0000-42710 False Alarms - Fire (6,000) 101-0000-41327 Document Transfer Tax 350,000 One Time Revenues and Expenses 101-0000-41710 State Government Revenue - CARES ACT 502,034 101-0000-41700 Federal Government Revenue - FEMA 98,900 101-1007-60195 Coronavirus Expenses 75,000 101-1007-99900 Transfer Out - CARES Act Funding for Small Business Grants 109,064 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 101-6001-60122 Credit Card/Electronic Check Fees 80,000 101-6002-60103 Consultant Services, GIS 45,000 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 101-1004-60101 Human Resources, Professional Services 20,000 101-6004-60120 Code Enforcement, Lot Cleaning 4,000 PUBLIC WORKS 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 35,000 101-3008-60115 Janitorial 50,000 101-7003-60120 Street Cleaning/Accidents 10,000 MARKETING 101-3007-60151 Greater Palm Springs Convention & Visitors Bureau 28,500 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 3,964,434 456,564 General Fund (101) 125 126 City of La Quinta FY 2019/20 Recommended Second Quarter Budget Adjustments Exhibit 2 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 501-0000-71031 Vehicles, Purchased 60,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 502-0000-42207 Capital Contributions 25,800 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 504-1010-60447 Earthquake Insurance 77,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 201-0000-42900 Section 2105 1,400 201-0000-42905 Section 2106 (2,500) 201-0000-42910 Section 2107 16,600 201-0000-42920 Section 2103 (29,900) 201-0000-42922 SB 1, Road Maint. Rehab 27,800 Total for Fund 201 13,400 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 202-0000-42218 MakerSpace Memberships (1,300) 202-3004-60115 Janitorial Services at Library 4,000 202-3004-60115 Janitorial Services at Museum 4,000 202-3006-60667 HVAC at Museum 15,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 221-0000-60127 Recycling Solutions 150,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 223-0000-41320 County Sales Tax 200,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 226-0000-43120 EMP Grant 7,600 226-0000-60432 Tools/Equipment 7,600 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 235-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 6,700 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 244-0000-41710 State Grant Revenue 60,000 244-0000-60103 Professional Services 60,000 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Information Technology Fund (502) Facility & Fleet Replacement Fund (501) SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Library and Museum Fund (202) Gas Tax Fund (201) Insurance Fund (504) AB 939 Cal Recycle Fund (221) Emergency Management Performance (EMP) Grant Fund (226) So. Coast Air Quality Fund (235) Housing Grants Fund (244) Measure A Fund (223) 127 City of La Quinta FY 2019/20 Recommended Second Quarter Budget Adjustments Exhibit 2 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 247-0000-49500 Transfers In, From General Fund 109,100 247-0000-60520 CARES Act, Small Business Relief Programs 109,100 247-0000-60461 Marketing & Tourism 60,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 255-0000-43200 Developer Fees (15,000) Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 256-0000-43200 Developer Fees (6,600) Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 259-0000-43200 Developer Fees 21,600 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 270-0000-43201 APP Fees 10,000 270-0000-99900 Transfer Out to CIP Fund - SilverRock Event Site (Project No. 201608)15,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 401-0000-49500 Transfer In from APP Fund 15,000 401-0000-60188 Construction, Art Mural at SilverRock Event Site (Project No. 201608)15,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 761-0000-41915 Non-Allocated Interest 15,000 Account No. Description Revenues Expenses 762-0000-41915 Non-Allocated Interest 300,000 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS CONTINUED PARS Pension Trust Fund (762) Street Facility DIF Fund (255) Park Facility DIF Fund (256) Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund (259) Art in Public Places (APP) Fund (270) CERBT OPEB Trust Fund (761) Economic Development Fund (247) Capital Improvement Project Fund (401) 128 January 4, 2021 TO: Cities, Schools and Special Districts of Riverside County SUBJECT: Impact of Appellate Court Decision in City of Chula Vista v. Sandoval, et. al. on the Calculation of Residual Payments from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund On May 27, 2020, the California Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District issued a decision in the case of City of Chula Vista v. Sandoval, et al. (49 Cal. App. 5th 539). In the case, the court considered a dispute regarding the allocation of residual funds related to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) distribution. Redevelopment Agencies (RDAs) were officially dissolved as of February 1, 2012. As a result of the elimination of the RDAs, tax increment is distributed to pay required payments on existing bonds, other obligations, and pass-through payments to local governments. The remaining property tax revenues that exceed the enforceable obligations are allocated as residual to cities, counties, special districts, schools and community college districts. The redevelopment agency dissolution laws require the County Auditor Controller’s Office to administer the trust funds according to the rules implemented by the state legislature. Section 34183 of the Health and Safety code instructs the County Auditor Controller’s Office to allocate the money in the trust funds in the following order of priority: (1) passthrough payments to local agencies and school entities as required by agreement of by statute at the time of dissolution; (2) recognized obligations of the former redevelopment agency, including bond debt service payments; (3) successor agency administrative costs; and (4) any residual balance to local agencies and school entities in accordance with Section 34188. This residual allocation was previously calculated by deducting the passthrough payments before determining each taxing entity’s AB8 share of the trust funds. According to the court’s decision, the methodology should not have deducted the pass through amounts prior to determining the AB8 share. This change will be reflected in the current year distribution beginning January fiscal year 2020-2021. Below is a general estimated projection of the residual financial impact by entity category using data from FY2019-20. This projection may change based on values and data for FY2020-21. Category Estimated Impact Cities -25% County 135% School Districts -13% Special Districts 68% If you have any questions, please contact Khanh Truong, Supervising Accountant at (951) 955-1375 or by email at Ktruong@Rivco.org. You may also contact Pam Elias at (951) 955-0320 or by email at Pelias@Rivco.org. Sincerely, Paul Angulo, CPA, M.A. County Auditor-Controller By: Pamela Elias Property Tax Division Chief Paul Angulo, CPA, M.A. County Auditor-Controller Tanya S. Harris, DPA, CPA Assistant Auditor-Controller COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR-CONTROLLER County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 11th Floor P.O. Box 1326 Riverside, CA 92502-1326 (951) 955-3800 Fax (951) 955-3802 EXHIBIT 3 129 130 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS PROPOSED 2021-2026 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATION Discuss the proposed 2021-2026 Pavement Management Plan update. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Every five years, the City reviews street conditions and prioritizes its street maintenance and resurfacing efforts in order to create a five-year Pavement Management Plan (PMP). •Generally, the review shows the City is doing a good job maintaining its streets. However, there may need to be an increased investment and future increase in the level of street maintenance in order to maintain the City’s adopted 80 pavement condition index (PCI) rating. FISCAL IMPACT None for this action. Per previous City Council direction, $1 million per year is allocated annually from the General Fund for roadway resurfacing. Staff recommends continuing this funding level for the next five-year PMP and to include additional pavement rehabilitation, resurfacing, and citywide striping refresh projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) using additional funding sources. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS To preserve the investment in its roadways, every five years the City inventories street conditions and prioritizes maintenance efforts which becomes the five-year PMP. The Draft PMP Five-Year Plan 21/26 (Attachment 1)includes a current inventory (with condition and preservation requirements) and a five-year work plan that is annually incorporated in the Operation and Maintenance budget and in the CIP. Attachment 1 depicts the recommended annual roadway maintenance improvements. The complete draft PMP document is available for review in the Public Works Department. Highlights include: STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 131 The roadway pavement network has: •129.7 centerline miles; •29,702,050 square feet of pavement; •An estimated replacement value of $175.6 million; and, •An average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 80 out of 100, which is considered very good condition. The maintenance improvements recommended during the next five years include: •2021/22 – Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs on Avenue 52 from Washington Street to Desert Club Drive, Desert Club Drive from Avenue 52 to Calle Tampico, Seasons Way, and within the Desert Pride development; •Crack sealing the east/west street segments within the Cove; •2022/23 – Grind and overlay of Avenue 47 between Washington Street and Adams Street; •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs on Avenida Herrera and Avenida Villa; •Crack sealing the north/south street segments within the Cove; •2023/24 – Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs on Fred Waring Drive between Washington Street and Adams Street; •Crack and slurry seal selected segments of Avenida Carranza, Avenida Navarro and Avenida Velasco; •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs on segments of Avenida Montezuma and Avenida Ramirez; •2024/25 – Crack sealing and slurry sealing selected street segments in the Cove, Fred Waring Drive from Dune Palms Road to Jefferson Street, and additional various segments throughout the City; •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs on Summer View Way and Bottle Brush Drive; •2025/26 – Crack and slurry seal selected street segments in the Cove; •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs on Calle Sinaloa from Avenida Montezuma to Eisenhower Drive. Staff seeks direction on the above priorities and will incorporate them into the Capital Improvement Program. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. City of La Quinta Draft Five-Year Plan 2021/26 132 La Quinta City of ENGINEERING Final Draft Report Pavement Management Update January 2021 Civil Engineering Design Construction Management Infrastructure Management GIS Mapping & Data Systems Inspection OMNIS INCORPORATED 981 W. Arrow Hwy #248 San Dimas, CA 91773 909-631-8335 Office www.omnis-inc.com ATTACHMENT 1 133 January 26, 2021 Mr. Bryan McKinney, P.E. City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 Subject: Final Draft Report for Pavement Management Update and GIS Mapping Services Dear Mr. McKinney: As part of the development of the Pavement Management System and GIS Mapping for the City of La Quinta, OMNIS Inc. hereby submits this Final Report. The information contained in this report presents the findings from the development of the system data associated with the pavement condition survey of the City’s street network. The City is also provided with the information that was used to develop the recommended improvement program. The Final report will include the following categories: Introduction Methodologies Condition Distribution Report Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Projected Work It has been a pleasure working with the City on developing the City’s Pavement Management Program. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact us at (909)631-8335. Sincerely, Omnis Incorporated John Gabor Project Manager 134 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary I. Introduction .................................................................................................... 2 II. Methodology ................................................................................................... 6 III. Condition Distribution Report .................................................................... 13 IV. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ................................................ 18 A. MicroPAVER Zoning Map ..................................................................... 20 B. Alphabetically ......................................................................................... 21 C. PCI Ranges Map ..................................................................................... 40 D. PCI Descending Order ............................................................................ 41 V. Projected Work ............................................................................................ 61 A. $1 Million Annually (5 Year Plan) ......................................................... 62 B. $1 Million Annually (5 Year Plan) Map .................................................. 75 C. Unlimited Budget .................................................................................... 76 D. Unlimited Budget Map ............................................................................ 93 135 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Pavement Management Program (PMP) for the City of La Quinta provides a current inventory, with condition and preservation requirement, for the roadways, and a forecasting of the budget needs. While the following recommendations have been generated by the Pavement Management Program, they are for planning purposes only and are not intended to replace sound engineering judgement. Final project recommendations should be weighed against the actual approach the City wishes to utilize in scheduling the workloads for contracting purposes. In addition, an engineering review of the pavement condition may indicate that a particular pavement section needs attention earlier than the other roads in its localized area.  Replacement value & quantity of pavement The pavement network within the City of La Quinta has 129.7 centerline miles of paved surfaces. There is a total of over 29,702,050 square feet of pavement. The estimated replacement value of the pavement of the roadway network for all paved streets is $175.6 million.  Condition of City’s pavement The overall condition of the City of La Quinta’s road network is Very Good, with an average “Pavement Condition Index” of 80, with 100 being a brand new street and 0 being a badly deteriorated street with virtually no remaining life.  Recommended preservation program and costs. A strategy was developed to reduce the backlog of street preservation work over the next 5 years and increase the overall condition of the road network. This strategy involves using both slurry seal and pavement resurfacing as preservation components. Preventative maintenance on streets with better than average PCI ratings must be considered in combination with the more extensive rehabilitation of failing streets to realize the maximum net benefit and reduce the long term costs. The strategies herein were developed to provide alternatives for halting the deterioration of the existing pavement, reducing the backlog of street maintenance work over the next 5 years and improving the overall condition of the roadway network. These strategies generally involve the utilization of crack sealing, patching, slurry sealing, and major work typically consisting of pavement overlays, overlays with fabric, and reconstruction. Future roadway maintenance plans for the City of La Quinta should be based on the general maintenance strategies developed from this pavement system analysis in combination with the other major contributing factors as discussed previously in this executive summary. 1136 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section I SECTION I INTRODUCTION NEED FOR PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM A Citywide Pavement Management Program will assist City personnel by providing current technical data to maintain a desirable level of pavement performance, while optimizing the expenditure of limited fiscal resources. Specifically, the program provides administrators and maintenance personnel with: • A current inventory of all public roadways • The current pavement condition for all public roadways • A project listing of all pavement needing maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement • A forecast of budget needs for maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement of deficient sections of pavement for a 5 year Capital Improvement Program THE PAVEMENT NETWORK The entire pavement network within the City of La Quinta is comprised of 129.7 centerline miles of paved surface. To assist in planning maintenance needs, the City's road system was broken into classifications based upon their importance in the road network, i.e. functional class such as arterial, collector, and local. Current Projected in 5 Years CLASSIFICATION Square feet Cline miles Square feet Cline miles Local/Collector 16,238,950 83.5 18,825,394 97 Arterial 13,463,100 46.2 15,607,423 54 TOTALS 29,702,050 129.7 34,432,817 150 Projection calculated out 5.0 years at 3.00% annual growth. The entire pavement network represents a current replacement valuation of over $178.7 million broken down by classification as follows: CLASSIFICATION Square feet Unit Cost for Replacement Total Replacement Value Percent of Replacement Value Local/Collector 16,238,950 $5.00 $81,194,750 45% Arterial 13,463,100 $7.24 $97,472,844 55% TOTALS 29,702,050 $178,667,594 100% 2137 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section I CURRENT CONDITIONS As part of the development of the Pavement Management System for the City of Coachella, a visual survey of the pavement network was conducted to assess the existing surface condition of each individual pavement segment. The federal guidelines specified by the Army Corps of Engineers in their Pavement Distress Identification Guide for Asphalt-Surfaced Roads and Parking Lots, dated June 1997, were used as the basis of the visual survey. Upon completion of this survey, a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) was calculated for each segment to reflect overall pavement condition. The PCI system is a rating mechanism used to describe the condition of the City’s pavement and has been adopted as the nation’s standard rating system by AASHTO and ASTM. Ranging between "0" and "100," a PCI of "0" would correspond to a badly deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life, while a PCI of "100" would correspond to a pavement with proper engineering design and construction at the beginning of its life cycle. The table below relates PCI ranges to general pavement condition definitions. PCI RANGE 86 –100 71 - 85 56 - 70 41 - 55 26 - 40 11 - 25 0 - 10 CONDITION Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor Failed A. PCI Ranges* * These are the ranges recommended by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The overall condition of the City of La Quinta’s road network based on current conditions is “Very Good” with an average PCI of 80. ANNUAL BUDGET PROJECTIONS Based on the results of the condition survey and input from the City, pavement preservation/rehabilitation strategies were developed. A standard agreement at the outset was to identify the City’s preservation and maintenance work program for the next 5 years, while reducing the preservation and maintenance backlog and increasing the overall condition of the network. A listing of the preservation and maintenance activities utilized in the strategy development is presented in Section 2. Each activity is representative of the types of work that have been programmed as part of the long term preservation and maintenance requirements of the City’s street network. The budgeting process was approached with the following in mind: generate a work program for the next 5 years based upon actual road pavement conditions in order to keep deferred maintenance constant and maintain the current high level overall condition. 3138 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section I The budget analysis at the Draft Report stage is to assist the City Staff in the creation of a proper plan that will suit the City’s current needs and standards. After discussions and meetings, OMNIS INC analyzed two scenarios for the Final Report.  $1,000,000 ANNUAL BUDGET– This scenario will show the work recommended for all maintenance types with a $1,000,000 million annual budget, the PCI ratings do lower, and the deferred maintenance does increase. The budget was run for a five year period. After a five (5) year period, the resulting pavement network average PCI is 79.9.  UNLIMITED BUDGET– This scenario will show the work recommended for all maintenance types for all roadways currently requiring maintenance. The Unlimited Budget represents the current backlog of $16.2 Million. These plans are a starting point to develop an understanding of how the system will assign streets and locations with budget dollars. The purpose is to create an accurate budget scenario for the City of La Quinta. The longer the system is maintained greater accuracy levels will be achieved. 4139 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section I RECOMMENDATIONS The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the street network is currently in good condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that the preservation activities be funded at the levels identified in the recommended work program to maintain a high network PCI value. In order to meet these requirements, certain projects have been recommended within the context of this program. The funding requirements just presented are generated in the form of individual projects, as outlined in the Projected Work Reports (Section V). While the project listings outlined in Section V are the recommendations as generated by the PMS, they are for planning purposes only and are not intended to replace engineering judgement. Before construction has actually started on the pavement work, a field verification should be conducted to ascertain whether conditions still warrant the recommended treatment or whether they have worsened. Final project recommendations should be weighed against the actual approach the City wishes to utilize in scheduling the workloads for contracting purposes. Pavement condition may indicate that a particular pavement section needs attention earlier than the rest of the roads in its localized area. Because pavement deterioration is a never-ending phenomenon, OMNIS Inc. recommends that all Arterial routes be re-inspected over the course of the next two years. In addition, OMNIS Inc. recommends that all Local roads be re-inspected over the course of the next three years (approximately 33% of the streets each year). This recommended inspection cycle will fulfill the requirements for the TEA-21 funding program and GASB 34. The costs for the re-inspection should be included in the annual pavement management budget to assure that the PMS has updated, accurate information. 5140 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section II SECTION II METHODOLOGY The following section provides a description of the methodology and rationale utilized in determining the recommended actions identified in this report. Field Survey An inventory of street data for each public roadway within the City of La Quinta was completed. Data, including distress types and quantities, segment length and width, etc. was collected on all public streets. Using a combination of City street maps and field survey forms to collect field information, a field crew visually surveyed each street. Data was categorized by street and “maintenance” segment. Maintenance segment limits were identified by determining the “logical” maintenance practices that would apply to each street and may vary from street to street, i.e. intersection to intersection, change in pavement type, change in overall pavement condition, change in pavement width, drainage conditions, crown of the roadway, sufficient pavement project areas or quantities, etc. It was determined that sufficient pavement project area and/or length should be at least one mile in length whenever possible. All data collected was entered into the APWA MicroPAVER version 5.2 pavement management software. Segmentation limits are from the curb lip to curb lip. The following Exhibit demonstrates roadway segmentation: 6141 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section II The roadway Main Street is divided into two segments by 2nd Street. The first segment is from the w/s (west side) of 3rd Street to the w/s (west side) of 2nd Street. The area of the intersection of Main Street and 3rd Street is within this segment. Please note that segmentation begins at the lip of gutter of the crossing roadway. The second segment of Main Street would begin from the e/s (east side) of 2nd Street and end at the e/s (east side) of 1st Street. The area of the intersection of Main Street and 1st Street is within this segment. The area of the intersection of Main Street and 2nd Street would belong to a 2nd Street segment not to Main Street. The 2nd Street segment begins at the s/s (south side) of A Street and continues through the intersection of Main Street and 2nd Street and ends at the s/s of B Street. The area of the intersection of 2nd Street and B Street is within this segment. It is important to establish the start and stop of roadway segments and to establish intersection allocation to ensure the intersection areas are only quantified once. After the data entry procedures were completed, a resultant distress rating was calculated for each segment. The distress rating is calculated using an algorithm developed by the Army Corps of Engineers that is recommended by the American Public Works Association and incorporated within the MicroPAVER software. The algorithm begins by giving each pavement section a score of 100 then deducting point values based on the pavement distress found within the section weighted by the quantity of distress. The Army Corps has assigned deduct values based on severity (low, moderate, or high) and the density of each distress, as shown below in the case of alligator (fatigue) cracking. The following chart is an example of an algorithm for alligator cracking in asphalt pavement. The algorithm weighs the total deducts within a section and calculates a total distress rating between 0 (failed) and 100 (excellent). 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 % of Density Low Mod High Alligator (Fatigue) Cracking Deduct Curve 7142 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section II The summary of all road condition data and the representative PCI's are located in the Condition Data Report in Section IV. Once the PCI has been established for a pavement section, the analysis and workload predictions can be commenced. Predictions on future pavement performance are based on a pavement deterioration curve researched and developed by the Army Corps of Engineers. The deterioration curves below shows the expected deterioration rate for typical asphalt (AC). The gray line represent the outer limits of data allowed to be included in creating the curve. Data beyond these limits will be considered anomalies. The yellow lines represent the upper and lower levels of data collected for an area. The green lines represent the deterioration curve for asphalt. Taking the averages of yellow line data creates the green line. Standard Deterioration Curve for Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pavements Standard Deterioration Curve for Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavements As a pavement ages, the system predicts the PCI of the pavement based on the deterioration curves. 8143 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section II The next step in the analysis is to determine at what point simple maintenance has become major rehabilitation. In the following chart it is suggested that after 75% of useful life renovation can take place for about $1.00 a square foot. If we wait 3 more years or 12% of life longer the cost is substantially higher at $4.00 a square foot. As you can see by the above graphic, by doing preventative maintenance on a pavement earlier in the pavements life, a substantial amount of money can be saved. For the City of La Quinta, it was determined that this critical point of work was as follows: AC Streets Critical Condition Principal Arterial 55 Minor Arterial 55 Collector 41 Residential 41 PCC Streets 10 9144 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section II MAINTENANCE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENTS The PCI is used by the system to schedule each pavement segment for maintenance activities. The MicroPAVER program recommends a specific maintenance activity based on the PCI and budget constraints. The MicroPAVER system generates work based on categories of maintenance, such as localized, global and major maintenance. Additionally, the City of La Quinta has implemented a crack sealing program to begin in the “Cove” area. The maintenance of “Mastic Crack Seal” is new to the program for wider than typical longitudinal and transverse cracking. Omnis encourages the City to maintain a crack seal program. Adjustments in unit costs and materials may be necessary. The engineering group has created the following unit costs that were reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta staff and used for budget scenarios. Estimated Construction Costs Thin Overlay * Assumed sample segment 1,000 feet long x 50 feet wide Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Extended Assumptions Grind and Overlay SF 50,000 $1.80 $90,000 Full width Grind and Overlay Repair Areas (Dig-outs) SF 2,500 $4.00 $10,000 5 percent of pavement area Utility Cover Adjustment EACH 5 $800 $4,000 Average 1 utility cover per 200 lineal feet of roadway Traffic Striping and Markings LF 3,167 $1.50 $4,750 12-foot lane widths Traffic Control LS 1 $6,240 6 percent of construction cost Subtotal = $114,990 Contingency (20%) = $22,998 Total = $137,988 $/SF = $2.76 Slurry Seal/Dugouts * Assumed sample segment 1,000 feet long x 50 feet wide Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Extended Assumptions Repair Areas (Dig-outs minor) SF 2,500 $14 $35,000 5 percent of pavement area Slurry Seal and Crack Seal SF 50,000 $0.25 $12,500 Traffic Striping and Markings LF 3,167 $1.50 $4,750 12-foot lane widths Traffic Control LS 1 $2,850 6 percent of construction cost Subtotal = $55,100 Contingency (20%) = $11,020 Total = $66,120 $/SF = $1.32 Slurry Seal * Assumed sample segment 1,000 feet long x 50 feet wide Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Extended Assumptions Slurry Seal SF 50,000 $0.25 $12,500 Traffic Striping and Markings LF 3,167 $1.50 $4,750 12-foot lane widths Traffic Control LS 1 $375 3 percent of construction cost Subtotal = $17,625 Contingency (20%) = $3,525 Total = $21,150 $/SF = $0.42 Crack Seal Crack Seal LF $1.32 Mastic Crack Seal M&H Severity (Wide) LF $7.00 10145 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section II Slurry Seal Slurry Overlay Digouts Seal Construction $/SF $2.76 $1.32 $0.42 Design 10.00% $0.28 $0.13 $0.02 Inspection/Testing/Survey 10.00% $0.28 $0.13 $0.04 Project Management / Construction Management 7.75% $0.21 $0.10 $0.01 $3.53 $1.69 $0.49 MAINTENANCE & REPAIR DECISIONS Once the activities were chosen and unit costs were defined, budgets and work assignments were generated for each work program on an annual basis. Using the pavement deterioration curves for each type of pavement surface and class of road, both current year and future years work requirements for each pavement segment within the City were determined. The current PCI is reduced annually based on the deterioration curve, maintenance activities increase the PCI value as they are applied to the segment. The overall program is dynamic in that each strategy consists of a cyclic series of actions that simulates pavement's anticipated life cycle. 11146 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section II PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORTS In addition to the annual budgets, this report contains a comprehensive assemblage of pavement management reports ranging from summary reports to annual maintenance and rehabilitation schedules. Collectively, as well as individually, the reports represent reasonable projections of pavement maintenance needs and performance based on visual condition assessments, unit cost estimates, and pavement deterioration models. It is important to note that pavement segment dimensions and surface area, along with the action and repair costs, as presented on the reports, are accurate within tolerable limits. This is noteworthy due to the "implied" accuracy of reporting length and width to the nearest foot, surface area to the nearest square foot, and action and repair unit costs and project estimates to the nearest penny and dollar, respectively. SYSTEM MAINTENANCE The City personnel need to maintain their commitment to the preventive maintenance system, while working toward reducing the City's present backlog of rehabilitation projects. In order to ensure that report outputs are accurate and credible, it is essential that the integrity of all data files be maintained. This will require performing all necessary updates when changes are made to scheduling scenarios, unit cost information, historical data, etc. In addition, the entire pavement network will have to be re-inventoried at regular intervals. This will not only allow work to be scheduled based on the most current condition data available, but will provide City personnel with a means to monitor actual rates of pavement deterioration so appropriate modifications can be made to the system curves. 12147 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section III SECTION III CONDITION DISTRIBUTION REPORT This report graphically depicts the distribution of the pavement condition throughout the street network by area. The condition ranges from “Failed” to “Excellent”, with an “Excellent” condition corresponding to a pavement at the beginning of its life cycle, and a “Failed” condition representing a badly deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life. The tables on the following pages show the general description for each pavement condition: Condition PCI Range Description Excellent 86 - 100 No significant distress. Very Good 71 - 85 Little distress, with the exception of utility patches in good condition, or slight hairline cracks; may be slightly weathered. Good 56 - 70 Slight to moderately weathered, slight distress, possibly patching. Fair 41 - 55 Severely weathered or slight to moderate levels of distress generally limited to patches and non-load-related cracking. Poor 26 - 40 Moderate to severe distresses including load-related types, such as alligator cracking. Very Poor 11 - 25 Severely distressed or large quantities of distortion or alligator cracking. Failed 0 - 10 Failure of the pavement, distress has surpassed tolerable rehabilitation limits. 13148 47.1%28.3%6,000,0008,000,00010,000,00012,000,00014,000,000(Square Feet)System Condition Distribution(All Streets)0% 0% 0%0.1%1.2%3.4%6.3%13.6%02,000,0004,000,000,,0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100Area (Condition14149 88%45.2%18.4%22.3%20000003,000,0004,000,0005,000,0006,000,000a (Square Feet)System Condition Distribution(Arterial Streets)0.0%0.0% 0.0%0.2%0.0%5.1%8.8%01,000,0002,000,0000-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100AreaCondition15150 13.2%20.6%41.7%24.6%100,000200,000300,000a (Square Feet)System Condition Distribution(Collector Streets)0.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0,0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100AreaCondition16151 49.8%36.4%3,000,0004,000,0005,000,0006,000,0007,000,0008,000,000a (Square Feet)System Condition Distribution(Residential Streets)0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2.3%2.0%3.8%5.7%01,000,0002,000,0000-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100AreCondition17152 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section IV SECTION IV PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) REPORT OMNIS Inc submits two (2) PCI Reports alphabetically and by PCI rating. The alphabetically report is listed by street name, this report provides the City with a listing of pertinent inventory and pavement condition data for each pavement section within the City's pavement network. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report notes the names, limits, classification, dimension, pavement class and PCI as of the last inspection for each pavement section. The PCI rating report is listed by condition rating descending and includes the same information that is within the alphabetical report. Detailed descriptions of the information appearing on this report are presented below: Branch Name - The name of each pavement section appears in this column. Generally, the pavement section name is taken directly from a street sign; however, where no street signs are posted, the name appearing on the network map is noted instead. Section Number - The street segmentation is numbered in this column. The length limitations are approximately 1300 linear feet for residentials and 2600 linear feet for arterials. From - A description of the beginning limit of each pavement section appears in this column. The limit will note the side of the boundary street from which the segment was taken (e.g., “N/S MAIN ST” refers to the north side of the intersection at Main St). If the beginning limit exists between intersections, then the beginning limit description may be an address, post mile marker, or a distance from a known point of reference (e.g., "500' N/O MAIN ST"). To - A description of the ending limit of each pavement section appears in this column. The description may consist of a street name, an address, or a distance from a known point of reference as described in the above section. Surface - A code was assigned to each pavement section to describe surface type. CODE DESCRIPTION AC Asphalt Concrete PCC Portland Cement Concrete Rank - The rank of each pavement section appears in this column. Typically, street segments are classified according to traffic volume or the agency’s circulation element. CODE DESCRIPTION A Primary Arterial B Secondary Arterial C Collector E Local/Residential 18153 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section IV Lanes – The number of lanes in the pavement section. Length – The length of the pavement section. Width – The width of the pavement section. Area – The area of the pavement section. Last Const. – The approximate date each pavement section last had construction work done. PCI - Pavement Condition Indexes were calculated for pavement sections based on severity and extent of distress manifestations observed within the pavement section. Ranging between 0 and 100, a PCI of "100" corresponds to a pavement at the beginning of its life cycle, while a PCI of "0" corresponds to a badly deteriorated pavement which is at or near the end of its life cycle. 19154 S H - 1 1 1 60TH AVE MONROE ST54TH AVE 50TH AVE 62ND AVE MILES AVE 52ND AVE I-10 JACKSON ST48TH AVE FRED WARING DR 49TH AVE WASHINGTON STLIGAAVENUE 52 CITRUS MADISON STDUNE PALMS RDAVENIDA BERMUDASAIRPORT BLVD PGA BLVD58TH AVEAVENIDA VALLEJOAVENIDA RUBIOWARNER TRLAVENIDA RAMIREZ61ST AVERIVIERAAVENIDA VELASCOJEFFERSON STAVENIDA CARRANZAOAK HIL LAVENIDA VILLAADAMS STBURR STINDIO BLVD AVENUE 58AVENIDA MARTINEZSHIELDS RDWINGED FOOT42ND AVE HERMITAGE DARBY RD HJORTH STMERION 51ST AVEEISENHOWER DRCALLE TAMPICO WESTWARD HO DR MANDARINA WEISKOPF 55TH AVECLINTON STVIA DONAROSS AVEDEL GATO DREL DORADO DRVIA SAVONAELKHORN TRLPINA VIA PAESSARO 47TH AVE 46TH AVE OASIS STAVENIDA MADEROPARK AVEHOVLEY LN LIMALIMA HALL RDVILLAGE DRBERMUDA DUNES DR CSILLA ST A V E N ID A M O N T E Z U M A CETRINO SOUTHERN HILLSGLASS DRPIRKER DR A N D AL U S I ACALEO BAYC O A C H ELLA D RAVENIDA F E R N A N D O MISSION DR ESTARLIGHT LN QUAI L RUN LNARACENA SPANISH BAY IROQUOIS DR TOM FAZIO LN N RI VI ERA AVETIBURON DR AVENIDA LA FONDASEELEY DRYOUNGS LNVIA CC TROON WAYVIA VALEROSAAVILA DRMI SSI ON DR WTOPAZ DRR O N D A MISSOURI DR FIRESTONEEMERALD DR ULRICH DRMOUNTAIN VIEWDELAWARE ST VI A DDPORT ROYAL AVE VIA SEVILLA CALLE HIDALGO BAFFIN AVE TOM FAZIO LN SVISTA ESTRELLAPOMELO ST VIA PISAP R IS M D RVIA CARMELTORINO DR MUIRFIELD VILLAGE VILLETA DR TORONJA BAYAJASPER PARK AVEPORT MARIA RDTEE ST CEREZATANGLEWOODPARK LNBALBOA PLPALM DRMONTICELLO AVETIGRIS AVE BELLERIVE POLO RD MARY LN FIESTA DR N U E V O D R V IA C A P R ISAND DRIOWA STJASMINE LN DEACON DR WV IA ME L ODIASUNBROOK LN53RD AVEDAKOTA TRLCORTE DEL OROBIG HORN DRALMONTEKENYA DRDESERT ROSE DRJEREZINTERLACHENYALE STDULCE DEL MAR PEBBLE BEACH DR AR A P AH O E ROCK ROSE DRMAGELLAN PLAVERY DR MARBELLA CTALYSHEBA DRYUCCA LNVIA SORRENTOC A L L E N O R TE VISTA LAGUNASHASTA PLVIA LUGOLA QUINTA DRN HERITAGE PALMS DRCAMEO PALM DRPEERLESS PLPECOS PLFREESIA PLCONTENTOSILVER ROCKDIANE DR VIA PORTOFINO TANGELO DRHAWKEYE DR SAGUARO RD ZENDA DR VIA BRAVA SPALDING DR VIA BELLAGIOTURNBERRY WAYMONTEGO BAY DR TUCSON CIR CEDAR CRESTARDENNAIS DRSOJOURN STLIBERTY STAVENIDA OBREGONSIENA DR SANDPIPER DR PEBBLE BEACHSIOUX DR QU A R R Y LN S VALLEY LNALI CTVIA SONATAVIA SOLANANAUTICAL DRST FRANCIS AVEN HARLAND DRDORAL STSIERRA VISTA SIENA CT VISTA FLORA VIDA BELLA DRRENEWAL STVILLANOVA STV IST A G R AN D E AVENIDA DIAZI-10 MOUNTAIN VIEW WASHINGTON STRIVIERAJEFFERSON ST51ST AVE 58TH AVEADAMS STADAMS STMADISON STADAMS STAIRPORT BLVD City of La Quinta PMS Zones 2021 Legend COLQCtrlines <all other values> GISID.ZONE zne1 zne2 zne3 zne4 zne5 ® 20155 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Estado eb1 Desert Club Drive w/sAvenidas Bermudas e/s1615 30 18,450E C&G zne181Calle Estado wb1 Desert Club Drive w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s2615 30 18,450E C&G zne179Washington Street Frontal3 Highland Palm n/s Washington St w/s21,000 30 30,000C C&G zne266Washington Street Frontal2 Singing Palms n/sHighland Palms n/s21,800 30 54,000C C&G zne268Washington Street Frontal1 Washington Street w/sSinging Palms n/s1185 18 3,330C C&G zne282Adams Street1 Avenue 48 n/sHighway 111 s/s42,895 81 180,170E C&G zne278Adams Street8 Fred Warring Dr n/sDarby Rd s/s21,975 32 57,720B C&G zne476Adams Street4 Highway 111 n/sMiles Avenue s/s54,845 60 261,600B C&G zne471Adams Street6 Miles Ave n/sFred Waring Drive s/s52,575 60 146,775B C&G zne476Airport Boulevard1 Monroe Street w/sMadison Avenue e/s25,100 82 300,000B C&G zne383Alba Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999E C&G zne482Alden Circle1 Seeley DriveEnd2580 36 20,880E C&G zne483Ambassador Circle1 Monticello Ave w/s CDS2250 32 11,479E C&G zne481America Court1 Hemings Way s/sCDS2295 32 12,919E C&G zne481Arbola Circle1 Fronterra DriveCDS2320 32 13,719E C&G zne484Arosa Way2 La Palma Drive s/sSanita Drive n/s2290 36 10,440E C&G zne475Arosa Way1 Villeta Dr s/sLa Palma Drive n/s2280 36 10,080E C&G zne482Ashley Place1 Carrie Ln e/sAshley Way e/s2800 36 28,800E C&G zne476Ashwood Court1 Bayberry Ave s/sCDS2150 34 8,559E C&G zne484Ashley Way1 Ashley Pl n/sDesert Stream Dr s/s2215 36 7,740E C&G zne479Auto Center Drive1 Adams St e/sLa Quinta Dr w/s21,005 50 50,250E C&G zne290Auto Center Way1 Hwy 111 s/sCircle2415 37 15,355E C&G zne288Avenida Alvarado8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2400 32 12,800E C&G zne181Avenida Alvarado3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,985 32 63,520E C&G zne584Avenida Alvarado6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne183Avenida Alvarado2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,935 32 61,920E C&G zne582Avenida Alvarado4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960E C&G zne181Avenida Alvarado7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2650 32 20,800E C&G zne176Avenida Alvarado5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240E C&G zne180Avenida Alvarado1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,935 32 61,920E C&G zne581Avenida Carranza8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2655 32 20,960E C&G zne174Avenida Carranza3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360E C&G zne582Avenida Carranza6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2615 32 19,680E C&G zne17721156 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Carranza2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,930 32 61,760E C&G zne581Avenida Carranza4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960E C&G zne177Avenida Carranza7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,200 32 38,400E C&G zne172Avenida Carranza5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240E C&G zne176Avenida Carranza1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,935 32 61,920E C&G zne579Avenida Cortez1 Avenida Montezuma e/sCalle Colima s/s21,960 32 62,720E C&G zne579Avenida Cortez3 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2625 32 20,000E C&G zne179Avenida Cortez2 Calle Durango s/sCalle Sonora n/s2575 32 18,400E C&G zne182Avenida Diaz9 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2690 32 22,080E C&G zne174Avenida Diaz4 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360E C&G zne577Avenida Diaz7 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne173Avenida Diaz3 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,940 32 62,080E C&G zne576Avenida Diaz5 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,295 32 41,440E C&G zne182Avenida Diaz8 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2450 32 14,400E C&G zne179Avenida Diaz6 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2575 32 18,400E C&G zne179Avenida Diaz1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,940 32 62,080B C&G zne575Avenue 471 Washington Street e/sAdams Street w/s22,515 43 108,145E C&G zne246Avenue 482 Dune Palms Rd w/sJefferson Ave w/s42,620 80 161,280B C&G zne286Avenue 481 Washington Street e/sDune Palms Rd w/s45,230 80 340,780E C&G zne287Avenue 501 Eisenhower Drive e/s Washington St w/s 43,965 66 232,990E C&G zne244Avenue 505 Jefferson Street e/s sharMadison Street w/s shared 25,190 30 155,700B C&G zne261Avenue 503 Park Avenue e/sJefferson Street w/s44,730 72 287,860B C&G zne291Avenue 502 Washington Street e/s Park Avenue w/s 43,140 72 181,080B C&G zne287Avenue 521 Avenida Bermudas e/sWashington St w/s42,735 82 178,280E C&G zne159Avenue 524 Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street e/s35,215 65 258,975B NON zne277Avenue 525 Madison Street e/s (eastbound) Monroe St w/s (eastbound) 25,275 32 124,800A C&G zne269Avenue 523 Silverrock Way e/sJefferson St w/s34,860 72 284,120B C&G zne297Avenue 522 Washington Street w/sSilverrock Way e/s43,520 82 216,640B C&G zne180Avenue 532 EndMonroe St w/s2815 50 40,750E NON zne381Avenue 542 Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street e/s35,070 56 226,320B C&G zne3100Avenue 541 Monroe Street w/sMadison Street e/s25,400 25 197,000B NON zne396Avenue 543 W/S Jefferson AveEnd22,500 50 125,000E C&G zne376Avenue 581 Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street w/s35,250 64 316,000B NON zne39422157 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenue 582 Madison Street e/s Monroe St w/s55,270 68 343,360A C&G zne399Avenue 601 Madison St w/sMonroe St w/s35,300 57 252,100A C&G zne381Avenue 602 Monroe St e/s City Limits21,335 25 33,375A NON zne373Avenue 621 Monroe St w/sEnd23,680 26 95,680A NON zne382Avenida Bermudas7 Calle Chillon n/sCalle Tecate n/s23,195 41 130,995C C&G zne578Avenida Bermudas5 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Chillon n/s43,120 61 190,320C C&G zne581Avenida Bermudas9 Calle Tampico n/sEND2515 46 19,690E C&G zne183Avenida Bermudas1 Calle Tampico s/sCalle Sinaloa n/s31,205 46 50,005E C&G zne185Avenida Bermudas4 Calloe Sinaloa s/sCalle Nogales n/s42,565 61 156,465C C&G zne194Avenida La Fonda3 Calle Tamazula e/sCalle Rondo w/s11,255 50 62,750E C&G zne176Avenida La Fonda1 Desert Club Dr e/sWashington w/s21,990 32 63,680E C&G zne174Avenida La Fonda2 Desert Club Drive w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s1630 64 40,320E C&G zne179Avenida Herrera 8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2625 32 21,536E C&G zne164Avenida Herrera 3 Calle Colima s/sCalle Nogales s/s22,000 32 64,000E C&G zne579Avenida Herrera 6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne175Avenida Herrera 2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,930 32 61,760E C&G zne577Avenida Herrera 4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,295 32 41,440E C&G zne178Avenida Herrera 7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,275 32 40,800E C&G zne174Avenida Herrera 5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2555 32 17,760E C&G zne177Avenida Herrera 1 CDSCalle Madrid s/s21,855 32 61,376E C&G zne577Avenida Juarez9 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2740 32 23,680E C&G zne180Avenida Juarez4 Calle Colima n/sCalle Chihuahua s/s21,270 32 40,640E C&G zne577Avenida Juarez7 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne182Avenida Juarez3 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,930 32 61,760E C&G zne574Avenida Juarez5 Calle Nogales s/sCalle Sonora s/s21,325 32 42,400E C&G zne186Avenida Juarez8 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2380 32 12,160E C&G zne179Avenida Juarez6 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2565 32 18,080E C&G zne182Avenida Juarez1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,950 32 62,400E C&G zne575Avenida La Jarita1 Calle Quinto e/sCalle Rondo w/s2525 32 16,800E C&G zne182Avenida La Torres1 Calle Rondo w/sCalle Quinto e/s2665 32 21,280E C&G zne184Avenida Madero10 Avenida Montezuma e/sCalle Monterey n/s2350 33 11,550E C&G zne582Avenida Madero3 Calle Arroba n/sCalle Colima s/s2625 32 20,000E C&G zne577Avenida Madero4 Calle Colima n/sCalle Monterey s/s2635 32 20,320E C&G zne57823158 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Madero8 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 33 20,460E C&G zne180Avenida Madero2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Arroba s/s21,290 32 41,280E C&G zne579Avenida Madero9 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2300 33 9,900E C&G zne180Avenida Madero7 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2565 32 18,080E C&G zne183Avenida Madero1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,945 32 62,240E C&G zne579Avenida Madero6 CDSCalle Sonora s/s2880 32 31,639E C&G zne185Avenida Martinez1 Avenida Bermudas e/sCalle Madrid s/s2785 32 25,120E C&G zne574Avenida Martinez3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,990 32 63,680E C&G zne578Avenida Martinez6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2625 32 20,000E C&G zne184Avenida Martinez2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,940 32 62,080E C&G zne577Avenida Martinez4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,285 32 41,120E C&G zne172Avenida Martinez7 Calle Sinaloa n/sEisenhower Dr e/s21,185 32 37,920E C&G zne184Avenida Martinez5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2560 32 17,920E C&G zne177Avenida Martinez8 Eisenhower Dr e/sCalle Tampico s/s2500 36 18,000E C&G zne182Avenida Mendoza 8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Tampico s/s2375 32 12,000E C&G zne168Avenida Mendoza 3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s 21,990 32 63,680E C&G zne580Avenida Mendoza 6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne182Avenida Mendoza 2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,940 32 62,080E C&G zne579Avenida Mendoza 4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,285 32 41,120E C&G zne173Avenida Mendoza 7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,025 32 32,800E C&G zne184Avenida Mendoza 5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240E C&G zne173Avenida Mendoza 1 CDSCalle Madrid s/s2125 32 6,016E C&G zne572Avenida Montezuma (Res.)1 Avenida Juarez w/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2950 32 30,400E C&G zne1100Avenida Montezuma4 Avenida Bermudas w/sEisenhower Dr e/s11,075 52 55,900E C&G zne180Avenida Montezuma3 Avenida Carranza w/sEisenhower Dr w/s21,275 37 47,175E C&G zne156Avenida Montezuma2 Calle Nogales n/sAvenida Carranza w/s23,295 32 105,440E C&G zne187Avenida Montezuma1 S End/Avenida MaderoCalle Nogales s/s25,405 32 172,960E C&G zne182Avenida Morales1 Avenida Montezuma s/sCalle Durango n/s2600 32 19,200E C&G zne177Avenida Naranja1 Calle Rondo w/sCalle Quinto e/s2510 32 16,320E C&G zne179Avenida Navarro7 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Tampico s/s 2615 32 19,680E C&G zne164Avenida Navarro1 Calle Chillon n/sCalle Colima s/s21,280 32 40,960E C&G zne576Avenida Navarro2 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,990 32 63,680E C&G zne574Avenida Navarro5 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne18224159 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Navarro3 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960E C&G zne177Avenida Navarro6 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,230 32 39,360E C&G zne184Avenida Navarro4 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2575 32 18,400E C&G zne172Avenida Nuestra2 Calle Kalima e/sCalle Guatemala w/s21,080 29 31,320E C&G zne181Avenida Nuestra1 Calle RondoCalle Tamazula21,260 32 40,320E C&G zne186Avenida Obregon9 Avenida Alvarado w/s CDS2625 32 18,763E C&G zne178Avenida Obregon8 Avenida Montezuma n/sAvenida Montezuma res s/s 290 32 2,880E C&G zne174Avenida Obregon3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360E C&G zne580Avenida Obregon6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne173Avenida Obregon2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,935 32 61,920E C&G zne581Avenida Obregon4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,285 32 41,120E C&G zne182Avenida Obregon7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2875 32 28,000E C&G zne174Avenida Obregon5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2565 32 18,080E C&G zne179Avenida Obregon1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,935 32 61,920E C&G zne581Avenida Ramirez8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2630 32 22,624E C&G zne169Avenida Ramirez3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360E C&G zne582Avenida Ramirez6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2610 32 19,520E C&G zne178Avenida Ramirez2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,935 32 61,920E C&G zne582Avenida Ramirez4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960E C&G zne180Avenida Ramirez7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,285 32 41,120E C&G zne176Avenida Ramirez5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2575 32 18,400E C&G zne180Avenida Ramirez1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,935 32 61,920E C&G zne577Avenida Rubio 8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2615 32 19,680E C&G zne181Avenida Rubio 3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360E C&G zne579Avenida Rubio 6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2615 32 19,680E C&G zne178Avenida Rubio 2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,940 32 62,080E C&G zne576Avenida Rubio 4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960E C&G zne183Avenida Rubio 7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2535 32 17,120E C&G zne180Avenida Rubio 5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2565 32 18,080E C&G zne183Avenida Rubio 1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,950 32 62,400E C&G zne575Avenida Tujunga2 Calle Quinto e/sCalle Rondo w/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne177Avenida Tujunga1 EndCalle Quinto w/s2550 32 17,600E C&G zne183Avenida Ultimo1 W. EndCalle Rondo w/s21,170 32 37,440E C&G zne18225160 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Vallejo8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2635 33 24,340E C&G zne167Avenida Vallejo3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360E C&G zne578Avenida Vallejo6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2625 33 20,625E C&G zne172Avenida Vallejo2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,930 32 61,760E C&G zne574Avenida Vallejo4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960E C&G zne179Avenida Vallejo7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,295 33 42,735E C&G zne175Avenida Vallejo5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240E C&G zne175Avenida Vallejo1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,930 32 61,760E C&G zne581Avenida Velasco8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2630 32 23,549E C&G zne179Avenida Velasco3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,990 32 63,680E C&G zne579Avenida Velasco5 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2630 32 20,160E C&G zne173Avenida Velasco2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,925 32 61,600E C&G zne576Avenida Velasco03a Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,300 32 41,600E C&G zne178Avenida Velasco6 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,300 32 41,600E C&G zne172Avenida Velasco4 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango n/s2580 32 18,560E C&G zne174Avenida Velasco1 CDSCalle Madrid s/s21,550 32 51,541E C&G zne573Avenida Villa 1 Avenida Bermudas e/sCalle Colima s/s21,700 32 54,400E C&G zne556Avenida Villa 7 Avenida Navarro w/sCalle Tampico s/s2535 32 17,120E C&G zne168Avenida Villa 2 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,990 32 63,680E C&G zne580Avenida Villa 5 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne183Avenida Villa 3 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,285 32 41,120E C&G zne175Avenida Villa 6 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Navarro w/s21,180 32 37,760E C&G zne183Avenida Villa 4 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240E C&G zne176Bayberry Lane1 Coldbrook Ln e/sDeerbrook Ln w/s2850 36 30,600E C&G zne479Bayberry Lane2 Deerbrook Ln e/s Sunbrook Ln w/s2220 36 7,920E C&G zne473Bayberry Lane3 Sunbrook Ln e/sAdams St w/s2130 36 4,680E C&G zne476Birchcrest Circle1 Bayberry Ln n/sBayberry Ln n/s21,400 32 44,800E C&G zne483BLACKHAWK WAY1 Dune Palms Road w/sAdams Street e/s32,600 44 114,400B C&G zne279Blazing Star Trail1 Star Flower Trail n/sDune Palm Road e/s21,880 36 67,680E C&G zne482Bottlebrush Drive1 CDSDate Palm Avenue w\s21,260 32 41,939E C&G zne269Bradford Circle1 Seeley DriveEnd2640 36 23,040E C&G zne477Bridgette Way1 Desert Stream n/sMiles Avenue s/s21,500 36 54,000E C&G zne485Buttercup Lane2 Blazing Star Trail s/sMarigold Lane n/s2420 32 13,440E C&G zne48126161 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIButtercup Lane1 EndBlazing Star Trail n/s2450 32 14,400E C&G zne479Cahuilla Park Road1 Jefferson Ave w/sEnd22,185 30 65,550B NON zne176Calle Amigo1 Avenida Bermudas e/sDesert Club Drive w/s2645 24 15,480E C&G zne178Calle Arroba7 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne582Calle Arroba9 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne582Calle Arroba2 Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne583Calle Arroba5 Avenida Diaz e/s Avenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne582Calle Arroba12 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Arroba4 Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne582Calle Arroba3 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne582Calle Arroba15 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne583Calle Arroba16 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Arroba1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s2255 32 8,160E C&G zne577Calle Arroba18 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2225 32 7,200E C&G zne581Calle Arroba8 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne582Calle Arroba10 Avenida Ramirez e/s Avenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne580Calle Arroba6 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne582Calle Arroba11 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s 2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Arroba13 Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2225 32 7,200E C&G zne583Calle Arroba17 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Arroba14 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne584Calle Barcelona1 Desert Club Drive w/s Avenida Bermudas e/s2645 24 15,480E ROL zne169Caleo Bay1 47th Ave48th Ave22,800 40 112,000E C&G zne286Calle Cadiz2 Calle Fortuna s/sCalle Guatemala w/s2225 32 7,200E ROL zne180Calle Cadiz1 Desert Club Drive e/sCalle Fortuna s/s2680 23 15,640E ROL zne183Calle Cadiz3 Desert Club w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s2640 25 16,000E ROL zne170Calle Chihuahua4 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chihuahua6 Avenida Carranza e/s Avenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Chihuahua2 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chihuahua9 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chihuahua12 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Chihuahua13 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chihuahua1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2310 32 9,920E C&G zne57927162 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Chihuahua15 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne578Calle Chihuahua5 Avenida Obregon e/s Avenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Chihuahua7 Avenida Ramirez e/s Avenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Chihuahua3 Avenida Rubio e/s Avenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne578Calle Chihuahua8 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chihuahua10 Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chihuahua14 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro e/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne578Calle Chihuahua11 Eisenhower Dr e/s Avenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chillon7 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Chillon9 Avenida Carrenza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne578Calle Chillon2 Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chillon5 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chillon12 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Chillon4 Avenida Jaurez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chillon3 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Chillon15 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chillon16 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Chillon1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s2180 32 5,760E C&G zne581Calle Chillon8 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carrenza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Chillon10 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chillon6 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Chillon11 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne575Calle Chillon13 Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Chillon17 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2320 32 10,240E C&G zne580Calle Chillon14 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Colima1 Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,260 32 104,320E C&G zne577Calle Colima2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s21,250 32 40,000E C&G zne577Calle Durango1 Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,460 32 110,720E C&G zne174Calle Durango2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s21,250 32 40,000E C&G zne178Calle Ensenada6 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne185Calle Ensenada8 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne178Calle Ensenada4 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne187Calle Ensenada11 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne18128163 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Ensenada3 Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne185Calle Ensenada2 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne187Calle Ensenada14 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne181Calle Ensenada15 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne180Calle Ensenada1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s2200 32 6,400E C&G zne186Calle Ensenada17 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne179Calle Ensenada7 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne181Calle Ensenada9 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne180Calle Ensenada5 Avenida Rubio e/s Avenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne186Calle Ensenada10 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne179Calle Ensenada12 Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne180Calle Ensenada16 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne181Calle Ensenada13 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne179Calle Fortuna1 Desert Club Drive e/sCalle Cadiz n/s2695 25 17,375E ROL zne180Calle Guatemala1 Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne178Calle Guaymas1 Avenida Tujunga s/sAvenida Naranja n/s2625 32 20,000E C&G zne174Calle Hidalgo2 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne179Calle Hidalgo5 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne181Calle Hidalgo8 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne184Calle Hidalgo9 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne184Calle Hidalgo11 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne185Calle Hidalgo1 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2225 32 7,200E C&G zne177Calle Hidalgo3 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne176Calle Hidalgo4 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne181Calle Hidalgo6 Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne183Calle Hidalgo10 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne184Calle Hidalgo7 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne183Calle Hueneme1 Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne177Calico Circle1 Blazing Star Trail n/sCDS2490 32 19,159E C&G zne482Calle Jacumba 1 Avenida La Fonda s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne178Calle Kalima1 Avenida Nuestra n/sCDS2610 32 22,999E C&G zne180Calle Iloilo1 Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne180Calle Madrid1 Avenida Cortez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,100 32 99,200E C&G zne57229164 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Madrid2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2600 32 19,200E C&G zne573Calle Monterey5 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Monterey7 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Monterey3 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Monterey10 Avenida Herrera e/s Avenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne581Calle Monterey2 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2440 32 14,080E C&G zne579Calle Monterey13 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Monterey14 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne578Calle Monterey1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s2235 32 7,520E C&G zne578Calle Monterey16 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Monterey6 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne589Calle Monterey8 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Monterey4 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Monterey9 Avenida Vallajo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne589Calle Monterey11 Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Monterey15 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne578Calle Monterey12 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Nogales1 Avenida Juarez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s22,585 32 82,720E C&G zne579Calle Nogales2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s21,255 32 40,160E C&G zne576Calle Obispo2 Calle Tampico s/sEnd2345 32 11,040E C&G zne175Calle Obispo1 EndCalle Tampico n/s2340 32 10,880E C&G zne175Calle Palmeto1 Calle Santa Barbara w/sCalle Placido w/s21,020 32 32,640E C&G zne487Calle Paloma1 Avenida Tujunga s/sCalle Tampico n/s2980 32 31,360E C&G zne191Calle Paloma2 Calle Tampico s/sLa Fonda n/s2625 32 20,000E C&G zne178Calle Paloma3 La Fonda s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s2590 32 18,880E C&G zne187Calle Placido1 Calle Palmeto s/sNuevo Dr n/s2490 32 15,680E C&G zne485Calle Placido2 Nuevo Dr s/sCalle Sonrisa s/s2545 32 17,440E C&G zne485Calle Potrero5 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne583Calle Potrero7 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s 2220 32 7,040E C&G zne575Calle Potrero3 Avenida Diaz e/s Avenida Rubio w/s2225 32 7,200E C&G zne589Calle Potrero10 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco e/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne575Calle Potrero2 Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne584Calle Potrero1 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne57530165 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Potrero6 Avenida Obregon e/sAvendia Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Potrero8 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvendia Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne575Calle Potrero4 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2225 32 7,200E C&G zne584Calle Potrero9 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvendia Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne575Calle Potrero11 Avenida Velasco e/sAvenida Bernudas w/s2200 32 6,400E C&G zne580Calle Prospero1 Calle Palmeto s/sCDS2675 32 25,079E C&G zne485Calle Quinto1 Avenida Nuestra n/sLa Fonda s/s2600 32 19,200E C&G zne182Calle Quinto3 Calle Tampico n/sAvenida Ultimo s/s21,290 32 41,280E C&G zne187Calle Quinto2 La Fonda n/sCalle Tampico s/s2620 32 19,840E C&G zne182Calle Rondo2 Avenida Ultimo s/sCalle Tampico n/s21,275 32 40,800E C&G zne182Calle Rondo1 Call Tampico s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s21,275 32 40,800E C&G zne186Calle Santa Barbara1 Calle Sonrisa n/sNuevo Rd s/s2640 32 20,480E C&G zne484Calle Santa Barbara2 Nuevo Dr n/sCalle Palmeto n/s2400 32 12,800E C&G zne486Calle Serena1 Vista Grande s/sEnd2120 32 3,840E C&G zne489Calle Sinaloa1 Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,310 32 105,920E C&G zne166Calle Sinaloa2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s41,265 82 84,830E C&G zne195Calle Sonora1 Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,240 32 103,680E C&G zne183Calle Sonora2 Eisenhower Dr e/s Avenida Bermudas w/s21,250 32 40,000E C&G zne178Calle Sonrisa1 Calle Placido e/sCalle Santa Barbara e/s21,025 32 32,800E C&G zne485Calle Tamazula1 Avenida NuestraLa Fonda s/s2600 32 19,200E C&G zne173Calle Tampico1 Eisenhower Drive e/sWashington St w/s43,950 72 247,080E C&G zne1100Calle Tampico3 Washington Street e/sPark Avenue e/s22,670 36 96,120E C&G zne178Calle Tecate1 Avenida Bermudas e/sAvenida Madero w/s22,250 34 76,500E C&G zne588Calle Temecula5 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s 2220 32 7,040E C&G zne574Calle Temecula7 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne576Calle Temecula3 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne575Calle Temecula10 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2215 32 6,880E C&G zne581Calle Temecula2 Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne579Calle Temecula1 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne573Calle Temecula6 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne575Calle Temecula8 Avenida Ramirez w/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne573Calle Temecula4 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne574Calle Temecula9 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2215 32 6,880E C&G zne57631166 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Temecula11 Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne577Calle Temecula12 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez e/s2220 32 7,040E C&G zne575Calle Vista Verde1 Nuevo Rd s/sCDS2705 32 26,039E C&G zne487Calle Yucatan1 Avenida Alvarado w/sAvenida Juarez e/s2845 32 27,040E C&G zne172Camino Amarillo1 Octotillo Drive w/sCDS2380 32 15,639E C&G zne482Camino Azul1 CDSCamino Rosada n/s2980 36 33,230E C&G zne476Camino Del Oro1 Camino Lavanda w/sOctotillo Drive e/s2270 36 9,720E C&G zne482Camino Del Oro2 Octotillo Drive w/sCamino Azul e/s2600 36 21,600E C&G zne482Cameo Dunes Place1 Cameo Palms n/sCDS2185 28 7,079E C&G zne278Camino La Cresta1 Camino Del Oro n/sCDS2405 32 16,439E C&G zne480Camino Lavanda1 CDSCDS21,025 32 39,757E C&G zne477Cameo Palm Drive1 Singing Palms s/sHighland Palms n/s21,740 32 55,680E C&G zne277Camino Rosada1 Camino Azul w/sOctotillo Drive w/s2655 36 23,580E C&G zne479Canterra Circle1 Octotillo Drive e/sCDS2360 32 14,920E C&G zne486Canterra Drive1 Octotillo Drive w/sMilago Drive2640 32 20,480E C&G zne482Carmen Place1 Villeta Drive n/sCDS2265 32 12,525E C&G zne475Carnes Circle1 Seeley DriveCDS2600 33 19,800E C&G zne484Carrie Lane1 Victoria Drive s/sAshley Place s/s2525 36 18,900E C&G zne477Cindy Court1 Debbie Dr w/sCDS2350 32 14,679E C&G zne481Cloud View Way1 Summer View Way e/sDesert Fall Way s/s21,130 32 36,160E C&G zne173Coldbrook Lane1 Miles Avenue s/sSunbrook Ln n/s2150 36 5,400E C&G zne483Coldbrook Lane2 Sunbrook Ln s/s Woodberry Ln s/s22,870 36 103,320E C&G zne478Commerce Court1 Corporate Centre Dr s/sCDS2190 36 10,299E C&G zne479Como Court1 Genoa Dr w/sCDS2675 32 25,079E C&G zne485Corporate Centre Drive2 Adams St e/sCDS31,265 36 48,999E C&G zne480Corporate Centre Drive1 Dune Palm Rd w/sCDS3625 36 22,500E C&G zne478Cortez Ln2 Roadrunner Ln e/sCDS2190 26 7,940E ROL zne494Cortez Ln1 Roudel Ln w/sRoadrunner Ln e/s2590 28 19,304E C&G zne494Crestview Terrace1 Highland Palms s/sCameo Palms n/s2470 28 13,160E C&G zne277CROISETTE COURT1 Darby Rd s/sCDS2535 30 18,750E C&G zne485Cristol Place1 Villeta DriveCDS2190 32 10,125E C&G zne481Dalea Court1 Blazing Star TrailCDS2420 32 16,919E C&G zne484Dandelion Drive2 Monticello Ave w/sVerbena Dr e/s2910 32 29,120E C&G zne48232167 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIDandelion Drive1 Monticello Dr e/sLiberty Ave w/s2790 32 25,280E C&G zne475Dandelion Drive3 Verbena Dr w/sCDS2525 32 20,279E C&G zne482DARBY RD1 Royal Palm DrCity Limits2485 32 15,520E C&G zne487Date Palm Drive1 Sagebrush Avenue s/sSaguaro Drive n/s2520 32 16,640E C&G zne271Debbie Drive1 Victoria Dr n/sKristen Ct n/s21,120 36 40,320E C&G zne484Declaration Court1 Monticello Ave w/sCDS2450 32 17,879E C&G zne481Deerbrook Circle2 Bayberry St s/sStonebrook Ct w/s2920 32 29,440E C&G zne471Deerbrook Circle1 Stonebrook Ct e/s Bayberry Ln n/s2470 32 15,040E C&G zne471Desert Air Street1 Desert Stream n/sCDS21,325 32 43,279E C&G zne481Desert Club Drive1 Avenue 52 n/sCalle Tampico s/s21,865 35 65,275E C&G zne169Desert Club Drive2 Calle Tampico n/sCDS21,000 35 35,000E C&G zne178Desert Crest Drive1 Desert Air e/sDune Palms w/s21,140 37 42,180E C&G zne485Desert Eagle Ct1 Desert StreamCDS2640 32 20,480E C&G zne485Desert Fall Way1 Summer View Way w/sCloud View Way w\s2665 32 21,280E C&G zne173Desert Fox Drive2 Desert Crest n/sCDS2515 32 16,480E C&G zne485Desert Fox Drive1 Desert Stream n/sDesert Crest s/s2750 37 27,750E C&G zne485Desert Hills Court1 Desert Crest n/sCDS2520 32 16,640E C&G zne485Desert Rock Court1 Desert Fox w/sCDS2475 32 18,679E C&G zne486Desert Sand Court1 Desert Crest n/sCDS2515 32 16,480E C&G zne486Desert Stream Drive1 Dune Palms Road w/sCarrie Ln e/s22,455 37 90,835E C&G zne4100Desert View Court1 Desert Crest Dr n/sCDS2515 32 16,480E C&G zne485Desert Wind Court1 Desert Air e/sCDS2515 32 19,959E C&G zne487Diane Drive1 Bridgette Way w/sDebbie Dr e/s2615 37 22,755E C&G zne483Diane Drive2 Debbie Dr w/sCDS2350 32 11,200E C&G zne479Dune Palms Road1 Avenue 48Highway 111 s/s22,650 68 180,200E C&G zne272Dune Palms Road2 Highway 111 n/sWestward Ho Drive s/s32,560 51 130,560B C&G zne478Dune Palms Road4 Miles Avenue n/sFred Waring Dr s/s42,565 61 156,465B C&G zne452Dune Palms Road3 Westward Ho Drive s/sMiles Rd s/s32,735 60 159,300B C&G zne469Eisenhower Drive3 Avenida Fernando s/sAvenue 50 s/s41,845 71 111,675B C&G zne273Eisenhower Drive4 Avenue 50 s/sCalle Tampico n/s22,430 50 121,500B C&G zne277Eisenhower Drive05A Avenue 52 s/sCalle Nogales s/s42,600 72 187,200B C&G zne177Eisenhower Drive8 Calle Nogales s/sAvenida Bermudas n/s45,225 72 325,920B C&G zne573Eisenhower Drive5 Calle Tampico n/sCalle Nogales s/s42,045 72 107,160B C&G zne110033168 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIEisenhower Drive2 Coachella Dr n/sAvenida Fernando s/s31,100 53 46,420B C&G zne288Eisenhower Drive1 Washington Street w/sCoachella Dr n/s44,060 58 235,480E C&G zne289Estelo Court1 Villeta DriveCDS2155 32 8,910E C&G zne480Fiesta Drive1 Jefferson Street w/sRoadrunner Lane e/s21,480 25 37,000E C&G zne477Forbes Circle1 Seeley e/sVia Coronado E/S2830 36 29,880E C&G zne474Foxtail Circle1 Buttercup Lane s/sCDS2450 32 17,879E C&G zne477Frances Hack Ln1 Avenida Bermudas e/sCDS2770 28 34,005E C&G zne154Franklin Court1 Morris Ave s/sCDS2145 32 8,119E C&G zne481Fred Waring Drive4 Adams Street w/sVenice Dr w/s62,585 91 198,565B C&G zne473Fred Waring Drive3 Dunes Palms Rd w/sAdams Street e/s42,605 38 98,990B C&G zne484Fred Waring Drive1 Jefferson Street w/sDune Palms Road w/s32,650 70 185,500B C&G zne476Fred Waring Drive5 Palm Royal w/sWashington Street e/s61,525 105 150,125B C&G zne462Fred Waring Drive04a Venice Dr w/sPalm Royal w/s61,125 86 81,000B C&G zne465Fronterra Drive1 Octotillo Drive s/sLaderra Drive n/s2570 32 18,240E C&G zne484Genoa Drive1 Naples Dr n/aTorino Dr n/s2760 36 27,360E C&G zne484Goldenrod Circle1 Buttercup Lane n/sCDS2540 32 20,759E C&G zne477Golden Sands1 Cameo Palms DriveCDS2180 28 6,939E C&G zne279Hancock Court1 Liberty Ave w/sCDS2260 32 11,799E C&G zne482Hemmings Way1 Monticello Ave w/sAmerica Ct w/s2285 32 9,120E C&G zne480Highland Palms1 Washington Street w/sEnd21,210 32 38,720E C&G zne275Horseshoe Road1 Roadrunner Lane e/sCDS21,000 25 29,109E C&G zne490Hummingbird Ln1 Fiesta Dr s/sCDS2200 25 6,847E C&G zne4100Hwy 1112 Adams St w/sJefferson St w/s65,325 100 532,500A C&G zne257Hwy 1111 Washington St w/sAdams St w/s63,665 108 395,820A C&G zne264Independence Way2 Monticello Way e/sJefferson Ave w/s2745 32 23,840E C&G zne480Independence Way1 Monticello Way w/sCDS2370 32 15,319E C&G zne480Iris Court1 Blazing Star Trail w/sCDS2350 32 14,679E C&G zne479Irwin Circle1 North Harland DriveCDS2610 32 23,565E C&G zne484Jefferson Street5 Avenue 48 shared n/sCity Limit shared31,010 62 62,620B C&G zne280Jefferson Street4 Avenue 50 s/s sharedAvenue 48 s/s shared35,255 42 220,710B C&G zne275Jefferson Street3 Avenue 52 n/sAvenue 50 s/s65,120 95 407,840B C&G zne275Jefferson Street2 Avenue 54 n/sAvenue 52 s/s65,265 98 451,290E C&G zne375Jefferson Street10 Avenue 58 s/sS/S QUARRY LN21,680 28 47,040B NON zne36834169 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIJefferson Street1 City LimitsFred Waring Dr n/s33,285 46 151,110A C&G zne478Jefferson Street8 Fiesta Drive n/sWestward ho Drive s/s21,150 55 45,250B NON zne476Jefferson Street6 Highway 111 n/sVista Grande s/s6685 104 66,440B C&G zne469Jefferson Street9 Miles Avenue n/s sharedFred Waring Drive s/s sha32,565 42 107,730B NON zne478Jefferson Street7 Vista Grande s/sFiesta Drive n/s2765 62 47,430B NON zne479Jefferson Street08A Westward Ho Drive n/sMiles Ave s/s62,650 98 249,700A C&G zne480Kara Court1 Bridgette Way w/sCDS2400 32 12,800E C&G zne485Kaye Court1 Debbie Dr w/sCDS2350 32 14,679E C&G zne482Kristen Court1 Debbie Dr w/sCDS2350 32 14,679E C&G zne487Ladera Drive2 Fronterra Drive w/sEnd2510 36 18,360E C&G zne484Ladera Drive1 Los Manos Drive w/sFronterra Drive n/s2350 36 12,600E C&G zne482Lake La Quinta 1 Washington StCaleo Bay2260 46 9,560E C&G zne288La Palma Drive1 Adams Street w/sLas Vistas e/s21,600 36 57,600E C&G zne477La Palma Drive2 Camino Azul w/sAdams Street e/s3140 66 6,440E C&G zne484La Quinta Center1 Hwy 111 s/sAvenue 47 n/s21,370 40 54,800A C&G zne282La Quinta Drive1 Hwy 111 s/sEnd51,475 60 71,500C C&G zne285Las Vistas Drive1 Fred Waring Drive s/sVileta Dr n/s2425 36 28,690E C&G zne479Las Vistas Drive3 Sanita Dr s/sForbes Cir n/s285 36 10,260E C&G zne482Las Vistas Drive2 Vileta Dr s/sSanita Dr n/s615 36 22,140E C&G zne481Latigo Circle1 Los Manos Drive e/sCDS2280 32 12,439E C&G zne485Laurie Court1 w/s Bridgette DrCDS2395 32 16,119E C&G zne485Liberty Avenue1 Morris Ave s/sDandelion Dr s/s2935 32 29,920E C&G zne481Los Manos Drive1 Miles Avenue n/sOctotillo Drive e/s21,050 32 33,600E C&G zne481Lowe Drive1 Seeley Drive W/SNorth Harland Drive W/S2840 36 30,240E C&G zne482Madison Street5 Airport Boulevard s/sAvenue 58 n/s45,275 80 299,600B C&G zne3100Madison Street1 Avenue 50 s/s sharedVista Bonita s/s shared12,605 12 31,260B NON zne2100Madison Street4 Avenue 54 s/sAirport Bl s/s45,225 82 336,650B C&G zne3100Madison Street6 Avenue 58 s/sAvenue 60 n/s45,630 82 391,660B C&G zne383Madison Street03A N/S AVENUE 54S/S AVENUE 5245,365 80 364,820A C&G zne383Madison Street3 Vista Bonita s/s sharedAvenue 52 n/s shared12,550 12 30,600B NON zne2100Main Street1 Desert Club Dr e/sAvenida La Fonda n/s2900 32 28,800E ROL zne178Malia Circle1 Ladera DriveCDS2170 32 8,919E C&G zne483Marguerite Court1 Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2400 32 16,279E C&G zne48535170 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIMarigold Lane1 Blazing Star Trail s/sButtercup Lane s/s2975 32 31,200E C&G zne480Mariposa Court1 Blazing Star Trail n/sCDS2430 32 17,239E C&G zne474Memorial Place1 Monticello Ave e/sCDS2675 32 25,079E C&G zne483Messina Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999E C&G zne483Milan Court1 Naples Dr n/sTorino Dr n/s2765 36 27,540E C&G zne481Milan Court2 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999E C&G zne483Milago Drive 1 Canterra Drive s/sOctotillo Drive n/s2350 32 11,200E C&G zne482Miles Avenue3 Dune Palms Road w/sWashington Street e/s56,170 82 505,940B C&G zne475Miles Avenue1 Jefferson Ave w/s (Westbound Only)Dune Palms Road w/s (Westbound)42,655 76 168,315B C&G zne482Monroe Street7 1985' n/o Airport Bl (southbound) Avenue 54 s/s (southbound) 13,265 13 64,045B C&G zne394Monroe Street5 2660' s/o Airport (southbound) Airport Blvd s/s (southbound) 32,660 41 109,060B C&G zne379Monroe Street6 Airport Blvd n/s (southbound)1985' n/o Airport Bl (southbound)21,985 32 63,520B C&G zne378Monroe Street4 Ave 58 n/s shared2660' s/o Airport (southbound) 22,650 32 84,800B NON zne372Monroe Street3 Ave 60 n/s (southbound)Ave 58 n/s (southbound)15,380 14 75,320A NON zne371Monroe Street2 Ave 61 n/sAve 60 n/s22,040 32 65,280A C&G zne371Monroe Street1 Ave 62 n/sAve 61 n/s23,300 26 85,800A NON zne377Monroe Street9 Avenue 53 n/s (southbound)Avenue 52 s/s (southbound) 12,560 13 33,280B NON zne334Monroe Street8 Avenue 54 s/s (southbound)Avenue 53 n/s (southbound) 12,700 13 35,100B NON zne372Monticello Avenue1 Miles Ave n/sFred Waring s/s22,710 32 86,720E C&G zne478Morning Glory Court1 Verbena Ave e/sCDS2595 32 22,519E C&G zne482Morning Glory Court2 Verbena Ave w/sCDS2525 32 20,279E C&G zne483Morris Avenue1 Monticello Ave e/sLiberty Ave e/s2525 32 16,800E C&G zne480Morris Avenue2 Monticello Ave w/s CDS2460 32 18,199E C&G zne481Naples Drive1 Milan Ct w/sGenoa Dr e/s21,945 36 70,020E C&G zne480Nolan Circle1 North Harland DriveCDS2585 33 22,694E C&G zne481North Harland Drive1 Miles Avenue n/sWest Harland Drive s/s21,000 36 36,000E C&G zne481Nuevo Drive1 Los Manos Drive e/sDune Palms Rd w/s21,530 36 55,080E C&G zne485Ocotillo Drive1 Adams Street e/sFronterra Drive w/s2575 36 20,700E C&G zne483Ocotillo Drive2 Fronterra DriveCDS21,760 36 61,680E C&G zne477Pala Circle1 Canterra Drive s/sCDS2130 32 7,639E C&G zne486Palermo Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999E C&G zne484Palm Garden Place1 Cameo Palms n/sCDS2180 28 7,824E C&G zne282Paloma Court1 Calle Paloma w/sEnd2310 32 9,920E C&G zne27436171 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIPalm Royal2 Rome Dr. n/sFred Waring n/s2410 28 11,480E NON zne480Palm Royal1 Washington St e/sRome Dr. n/s32,715 53 143,495A C&G zne481Park Avenue1 Calle Tampico n/sAvenue 5022,730 40 109,200E C&G zne180Parkbrook Court1 Birchcrest Cir w/sCDS2230 32 11,405E C&G zne484Parma Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999E C&G zne483Pompeii Court1 Venice Dr w/sCDS2685 32 25,399E C&G zne483Ramblewood Ct1 Sunbrook LnEnd2320 32 13,719E C&G zne480Randolph Court1 Monticello Ave w/sCDS2190 32 9,559E C&G zne482Roadrunner Lane1 Cortez Lane n/sWestward Ho Drive s/s21,200 25 30,000E C&G zne497Rockberry Court1 Coldbrook Ln w/sCDS2385 32 16,365E C&G zne476Rome Drive1 Milan Ct w/sPalm Royal e/s2180 28 5,040E NON zne489Roudel Ln1 Cortez Ln n/sEnd2600 25 15,000E C&G zne486Saffron Court1 Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2400 32 16,279E C&G zne482Sagebrush Avenue1 160' w/o Date Palm Drive Washington Street e/s21,350 32 43,200E C&G zne271Saguaro Drive1 CDSDATE PALM W/S21,260 32 41,940E C&G zne271Salerno Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999E C&G zne485Sand Flower Place1 Cameo Plams n/sCDS2180 28 7,824E C&G zne282Sanita Drive1 Arosa Way s/sCDS21,720 36 65,039E C&G zne475San Marino Court1 Venice Dr w/sCDS2685 32 25,399E C&G zne479Seasons Way1 Calle Tampico n/sSpringtime Way s/s2450 36 16,200E C&G zne141Seeley Drive2 Bradford CircleMiles Avenue2470 73 29,570E C&G zne482Seeley Drive1 Forbes Circle s/sBradford Circle n/s2570 36 20,520E C&G zne482Shadwell Circle1 Monticello Ave w/sCDS2300 32 13,079E C&G zne478Siena Court1 Genoa Dr w/sCDS2675 32 25,079E C&G zne485Silver Rock2 Club HouseJefferson Ave w/s25,570 30 167,100E C&G zne2100Silver Rock1 S/S Avenue 52Club House23,000 35 105,000E C&G zne298Simon Drive1 Washington Street e/sHighway 111 s/s21,035 61 63,135E C&G zne295Singing Palms Drive2 Cameo Palms Drive CDS2200 32 8,299E C&G zne282Singing Palms Drive1 Washington Street w/sCameo Palm Drive w/s2250 32 8,000E C&G zne286Sonesta Way1 Villeta Drive n/sVilleta Drive n/s21,120 36 40,320E C&G zne472Springbrook Court1 Sunbrook Ln n/sCDS2135 32 7,799E C&G zne472Springtime Way1 Desert Club e/sCDS21,240 36 43,040E C&G zne164Star Flower Trail1 Dune Palms Road e/sCDS21,200 36 46,679E C&G zne47837172 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIStonebrook Court1 Deerbrook Cir n/sCDS2290 32 12,759E C&G zne468Summerbrook Court1 Coldbrook Ln w/sCDS2150 32 8,279E C&G zne464Summer View Way1 Springtime Way n/sDesert Fall Way n/s2480 32 15,360E C&G zne165Sunberry Court1 Birchcrest Circle n/sCDS2120 32 5,376E C&G zne484Sunbrook Ln1 Woodberry Ln s/sCDS22,600 36 96,720E C&G zne465Sweetbush Lane1 Buttercup Lane n/sCDS2545 32 20,919E C&G zne483Tiara Place1 Villeta Drive n/sCDS2260 32 11,799E C&G zne481Torino Drive1 Genoa Dr w/sMilan Ct e/s21,850 37 68,450E C&G zne483Tortola Circle1 Ladera DriveCDS2165 32 8,759E C&G zne485Venice Drive1 Fred Waring n/sNaples Rd s/s2125 47 3,875E C&G zne482Venice Drive2 Naples Rd n/sTorino Dr s/s2710 36 25,560E C&G zne485Verbena Drive2 Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2400 32 16,279E C&G zne478Verbena Drive1 Star Flower Trail s/sMiles Ave n/s2740 36 26,640E C&G zne480Verona Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999E C&G zne484Via Caliente1 Via Del Monte e/sEnd2340 37 12,580E C&G zne481Via Coronado1 Forbes Circle s/sCDS2720 37 30,119E C&G zne482Via Del Monte1 Via Sevilla s/sVia Caliente s/s2315 37 11,655E C&G zne483Via Del Sol1 Via Sevilla n/sCDS2185 33 9,584E C&G zne486Via Sevilla1 Via Coronado w/sWashington St e/s22,185 37 80,845E C&G zne482Via Tranquillo1 Vista Grande s/sEnd2120 32 3,840E C&G zne488Victoria Drive1 Bridgette Way w/sAdams St e/s21,140 37 42,180E C&G zne486Villeta Drive1 Sanita Drive n/sSonesta Drive s/s23,600 36 129,600E C&G zne475Violet Court1 Bridgette Way w/sCDS2395 32 16,119E C&G zne486Vista Grande1 Jefferson Street e/sEnd2925 37 34,225E C&G zne488Wakefield Circle1 Coldbrook Ln s/sCold Brook Ln s/s21,950 32 62,400E C&G zne470Washington Street4 Avenida Montero n/sEisenhower Drive n/s71,890 112 211,680B C&G zne272Washington Street7 Avenue 47 n/sSimon Drive s/s51,780 86 153,080B C&G zne277Washington Street1 Avenue 52 s/sCalle Tampico n/s41,410 92 110,200B C&G zne197Washington Street2 Calle Tampico n/sAvenida Montero n/s64,435 92 369,300B C&G zne2100Washington Street5 Eisenhower Drive n/sAvenue 47 n/s64,440 92 360,780B C&G zne278Washington Street13 Fred Waring Drive n/sCity Limit62,955 82 212,435B C&G zne482Washington Street9 Highway 111 n/sMiles Avenue n/s62,845 86 217,830B C&G zne474Washington Street11 Miles Avenue n/sVia Sevilla n/s61,600 99 137,680B C&G zne47338173 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020AlphabeticalNameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIWashington Street8 Simon Drive s/sHighway 111 s/s8965 99 80,885B C&G zne279Washington Street12 Via Sevilla n/sFred Waring Drive s/s61,670 88 128,900B C&G zne480West Harland Drive1 North Harland Drive e/sLas Vistas Drive e/s2835 36 30,060E C&G zne480Westward Ho Drive1 Jefferson St w/s (Eastbound Only) Dune Palms Rd e/s (Eastbound) 22,620 30 78,600E C&G zne479Willow Circle1 Blazing Star Trail s/sCDS2325 32 13,879E C&G zne485Williamstone Way1 Liberty Ave w/sMonticello Ave e/s2600 32 19,200E C&G zne482Winter Cove Court1 Summer View Way e/sCDS2420 32 13,440E C&G zne179Woodberry Ln1 Adams St w/sSunbrook Ln e/s2120 36 4,320E C&G zne483684,980 29,702,05080Total Length (LF)684,980LFTotal Area (SF)29,702,050SFTotal Centerline Miles129.7MilesAverage PCI80PCI39174 SH-111 60TH AVE MONROE ST54TH AVE 50TH AVE 62ND AVE MILES AVE 52ND AVE JACKSON ST48TH AVE FRED WARING DR 49TH AVE WASHINGTON STLIGAAVENUE 52 MADISON STCITRUSDUNE PALMS RDAIRPORT BLVD PGA BLVD58TH AVEAVENIDA VALLEJOAVENIDA RUBIO61ST AVERIVIERA JEFFERSON STOAK HILLAVENIDA VILLAADAMS STAVENUE 58AVENIDA MARTINEZSHIELDS RDWINGED FOOTHERMITAGE DARBY RD HJORTH STMER ION 51ST AVEEISENHOWER DRCALLE TAMPICO MANDARINA WEISKOPF 55TH AVEVIA DONAWARNER TRLROSS AVEBURR STDEL GATO DRVIA SAVONACALLE SINALOA VIA PAESSARO 47TH AVE 46TH AVE OASIS STAVENIDA MADEROPARK AVELIMA VILLAGE DR CSILLA ST CETRINO B O N IT A T R L PIRKER DR ANDALUSIACALEO BAYC O A C H ELL A D RQUAIL RUN LNARACENA SPANISH BAY TOM FAZIO LN NSEELEY DRYOUNGS LNMI SSI ON DR WTOPAZ DRR ON D AFIRESTONEEMERALD DR MOUNTAIN VIEW VIA DDCALLE HIDALGO TOM FAZIO LN SVISTA ESTRELLAVIA P A VIO N POMELO ST AVENIDA BERMUDASTORINO DR JASPER PARK AVE TEE ST PARK LNPALM DRPOLO RDCORTEZ PLFIESTA DR N U E VO D R V IA C A P R ISAND DR53RD AVEBORDEAUX DRAPPIAN WAYTANGELOYALE STPEBBLE BEACH DR VI A B O L E R OBRADSHAW TRLCALLE NORTE VIA LUGOLA QUINTA DRPECOS PL CONTENTOSILVER ROCKHAWKEYE DR ZENDA DR VIA BRAVA LUNDBERG LNARDENNAIS DRVICTORIA DR LIBERTY ST58TH AVEMADISON STADAMS STADAMS STADAMS ST51ST AVEJEFFERSON STAIRPORT BLVD ® Legend La Quinta Private Streets PCI Ranges Map 100-86 85-71 70-56 55-41 40-26 City of La Quinta PCI Ranges Map 2021 40175 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Montezuma (Res.)1 Avenida Juarez w/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2950 32 30,400EC&Gzne1100Avenue 542 Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street e/s35,070 56 226,320BC&Gzne3100Calle Tampico1 Eisenhower Drive e/sWashington St w/s43,950 72 247,080EC&Gzne1100Desert Stream Drive1 Dune Palms Road w/sCarrie Ln e/s22,455 37 90,835EC&Gzne4100Eisenhower Drive5 Calle Tampico n/sCalle Nogales s/s42,045 72 107,160BC&Gzne1100Hummingbird Ln1Fiesta Dr s/sCDS2200 25 6,847EC&Gzne4100Madison Street1 Avenue 50 s/s sharedVista Bonita s/s shared12,605 12 31,260BNONzne2100Madison Street3 Vista Bonita s/s sharedAvenue 52 n/s shared12,550 12 30,600BNONzne2100Madison Street4 Avenue 54 s/sAirport Bl s/s45,225 82 336,650BC&Gzne3100Madison Street5 Airport Boulevard s/sAvenue 58 n/s45,275 80 299,600BC&Gzne3100Silver Rock2 Club HouseJefferson Ave w/s25,570 30 167,100EC&Gzne2100Washington Street2 Calle Tampico n/sAvenida Montero n/s64,435 92 369,300BC&Gzne2100Avenue 582 Madison Street e/s Monroe St w/s55,270 68 343,360AC&Gzne399Silver Rock1 S/S Avenue 52Club House23,000 35 105,000EC&Gzne298Avenue 523 Silverrock Way e/sJefferson St w/s34,860 72 284,120BC&Gzne297Roadrunner Lane1 Cortez Lane n/sWestward Ho Drive s/s21,200 25 30,000EC&Gzne497Washington Street1 Avenue 52 s/sCalle Tampico n/s41,410 92 110,200BC&Gzne197Avenue 541 Monroe Street w/sMadison Street e/s25,400 25 197,000BNONzne396Calle Sinaloa2EisenhowerDre/sAvenida Bermudas w/s41,2658284,830EC&Gzne195Calle Sinaloa2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s41,2658284,830EC&Gzne195Simon Drive1 Washington Street e/sHighway 111 s/s21,035 61 63,135EC&Gzne295Avenida Bermudas4 Calloe Sinaloa s/sCalle Nogales n/s42,565 61 156,465CC&Gzne194Avenue 581 Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street w/s35,250 64 316,000BNONzne394Cortez Ln1 Roudel Ln w/sRoadrunner Ln e/s2590 28 19,304EC&Gzne494Cortez Ln2 Roadrunner Ln e/sCDS2190 26 7,940EROLzne494Monroe Street7 1985' n/o Airport Bl (southbound) Avenue 54 s/s (southbound) 13,265 13 64,045BC&Gzne394Avenue 503 Park Avenue e/sJefferson Street w/s44,730 72 287,860BC&Gzne291Calle Paloma1 Avenida Tujunga s/sCalle Tampico n/s2980 32 31,360EC&Gzne191Auto Center Drive1 Adams St e/sLa Quinta Dr w/s21,005 50 50,250EC&Gzne290Horseshoe Road1 Roadrunner Lane e/sCDS21,000 25 29,109EC&Gzne490Calle Monterey6 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne589Calle Monterey9 Avenida Vallajo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne58941176 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Potrero3 Avenida Diaz e/s Avenida Rubio w/s2225 32 7,200EC&Gzne589Calle Serena1 Vista Grande s/sEnd2120 32 3,840EC&Gzne489Eisenhower Drive1 Washington Street w/sCoachella Dr n/s44,060 58 235,480EC&Gzne289Rome Drive1 Milan Ct w/sPalm Royal e/s2180 28 5,040ENONzne489Auto Center Way1 Hwy 111 s/sCircle2415 37 15,355EC&Gzne288Calle Tecate1 Avenida Bermudas e/sAvenida Madero w/s22,250 34 76,500EC&Gzne588Eisenhower Drive2 Coachella Dr n/sAvenida Fernando s/s31,100 53 46,420BC&Gzne288Lake La Quinta 1 Washington StCaleo Bay2260 46 9,560EC&Gzne288Via Tranquillo1 Vista Grande s/sEnd2120 32 3,840EC&Gzne488Vista Grande1 Jefferson Street e/sEnd2925 37 34,225EC&Gzne488Avenida Montezuma2 Calle Nogales n/sAvenida Carranza w/s23,295 32 105,440EC&Gzne187Avenue 481 Washington Street e/sDune Palms Rd w/s45,230 80 340,780EC&Gzne287Avenue 502 Washington Street e/s Park Avenue w/s 43,140 72 181,080BC&Gzne287Calle Ensenada2 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne187Calle Ensenada4 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne187Calle Palmeto1 Calle Santa Barbara w/sCalle Placido w/s21,020 32 32,640EC&Gzne487Calle Paloma3 La Fonda s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s2590 32 18,880EC&Gzne187Calle Quinto3 Calle Tampico n/sAvenida Ultimo s/s21,290 32 41,280EC&Gzne187Calle Vista Verde1Nuevo Rd s/sCDS27053226,039EC&Gzne487Calle Vista Verde1Nuevo Rd s/sCDS27053226,039EC&Gzne487DARBY RD1 Royal Palm DrCity Limits2485 32 15,520EC&Gzne487Desert Wind Court1 Desert Air e/sCDS2515 32 19,959EC&Gzne487Kristen Court1 Debbie Dr w/sCDS2350 32 14,679EC&Gzne487Avenida Juarez5 Calle Nogales s/sCalle Sonora s/s21,325 32 42,400EC&Gzne186Avenida Nuestra1 Calle RondoCalle Tamazula21,260 32 40,320EC&Gzne186Avenue 482 Dune Palms Rd w/sJefferson Ave w/s42,620 80 161,280BC&Gzne286Caleo Bay1 47th Ave48th Ave22,800 40 112,000EC&Gzne286Calle Ensenada1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s2200 32 6,400EC&Gzne186Calle Ensenada5 Avenida Rubio e/s Avenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne186Calle Rondo1 Call Tampico s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s21,275 32 40,800EC&Gzne186Calle Santa Barbara2 Nuevo Dr n/sCalle Palmeto n/s2400 32 12,800EC&Gzne486Canterra Circle1 Octotillo Drive e/sCDS2360 32 14,920EC&Gzne48642177 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIDesert Rock Court1 Desert Fox w/sCDS2475 32 18,679EC&Gzne486Desert Sand Court1 Desert Crest n/sCDS2515 32 16,480EC&Gzne486Pala Circle1 Canterra Drive s/sCDS2130 32 7,639EC&Gzne486Roudel Ln1 Cortez Ln n/sEnd2600 25 15,000EC&Gzne486Singing Palms Drive1 Washington Street w/sCameo Palm Drive w/s2250 32 8,000EC&Gzne286Via Del Sol1 Via Sevilla n/sCDS2185 33 9,584EC&Gzne486Victoria Drive1 Bridgette Way w/sAdams St e/s21,140 37 42,180EC&Gzne486Violet Court1 Bridgette Way w/sCDS2395 32 16,119EC&Gzne486Avenida Bermudas1 Calle Tampico s/sCalle Sinaloa n/s31,205 46 50,005EC&Gzne185Avenida Madero6 CDSCalle Sonora s/s2880 32 31,639EC&Gzne185Bridgette Way1 Desert Stream n/sMiles Avenue s/s 21,500 36 54,000EC&Gzne485Calle Ensenada3 Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne185Calle Ensenada6 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne185Calle Hidalgo11 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne185Calle Placido1 Calle Palmeto s/sNuevo Dr n/s2490 32 15,680EC&Gzne485Calle Placido2 Nuevo Dr s/sCalle Sonrisa s/s2545 32 17,440EC&Gzne485Calle Prospero1 Calle Palmeto s/sCDS2675 32 25,079EC&Gzne485Calle Sonrisa1 Calle Placido e/sCalle Santa Barbara e/s21,025 32 32,800EC&Gzne485Como Court1Genoa Dr w/sCDS26753225,079EC&Gzne485Como Court1Genoa Dr w/sCDS26753225,079EC&Gzne485CROISETTE COURT1 Darby Rd s/sCDS2535 30 18,750EC&Gzne485Desert Crest Drive1 Desert Air e/sDune Palms w/s21,140 37 42,180EC&Gzne485Desert Eagle Ct1 Desert StreamCDS2640 32 20,480EC&Gzne485Desert Fox Drive1 Desert Stream n/sDesert Crest s/s2750 37 27,750EC&Gzne485Desert Fox Drive2 Desert Crest n/sCDS2515 32 16,480EC&Gzne485Desert Hills Court1 Desert Crest n/sCDS2520 32 16,640EC&Gzne485Desert View Court1 Desert Crest Dr n/sCDS2515 32 16,480EC&Gzne485Kara Court1 Bridgette Way w/sCDS2400 32 12,800EC&Gzne485La Quinta Drive1 Hwy 111 s/sEnd51,475 60 71,500CC&Gzne285Latigo Circle1 Los Manos Drive e/sCDS2280 32 12,439EC&Gzne485Laurie Court1 w/s Bridgette DrCDS2395 32 16,119EC&Gzne485Marguerite Court1 Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2400 32 16,279EC&Gzne48543178 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCINuevo Drive1 Los Manos Drive e/sDune Palms Rd w/s21,530 36 55,080EC&Gzne485Salerno Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999EC&Gzne485Siena Court1Genoa Dr w/sCDS2675 32 25,079EC&Gzne485Tortola Circle1 Ladera DriveCDS2165 32 8,759EC&Gzne485Venice Drive2 Naples Rd n/sTorino Dr s/s2710 36 25,560EC&Gzne485Willow Circle1 Blazing Star Trail s/sCDS2325 32 13,879EC&Gzne485Arbola Circle1 Fronterra DriveCDS2320 32 13,719EC&Gzne484Ashwood Court1 Bayberry Ave s/sCDS2150 34 8,559EC&Gzne484Avenida Alvarado3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,985 32 63,520EC&Gzne584Avenida La Torres1 Calle Rondo w/sCalle Quinto e/s2665 32 21,280EC&Gzne184Avenida Martinez6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2625 32 20,000EC&Gzne184Avenida Martinez7 Calle Sinaloa n/sEisenhower Dr e/s21,185 32 37,920EC&Gzne184Avenida Mendoza 7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,025 32 32,800EC&Gzne184Avenida Navarro6 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,230 32 39,360EC&Gzne184Calle Arroba14 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne584Calle Hidalgo8 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne184Calle Hidalgo9 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne184Calle Hidalgo10 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne184Calle Potrero2Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220327,040EC&Gzne584Calle Potrero2Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220327,040EC&Gzne584Calle Potrero4 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2225 32 7,200EC&Gzne584Calle Santa Barbara1 Calle Sonrisa n/sNuevo Rd s/s2640 32 20,480EC&Gzne484Carnes Circle1 Seeley DriveCDS2600 33 19,800EC&Gzne484Dalea Court1 Blazing Star TrailCDS2420 32 16,919EC&Gzne484Debbie Drive1 Victoria Dr n/sKristen Ct n/s21,120 36 40,320EC&Gzne484Fred Waring Drive3 Dunes Palms Rd w/sAdams Street e/s42,605 38 98,990BC&Gzne484Fronterra Drive1 Octotillo Drive s/sLaderra Drive n/s2570 32 18,240EC&Gzne484Genoa Drive1 Naples Dr n/aTorino Dr n/s2760 36 27,360EC&Gzne484Irwin Circle1 North Harland DriveCDS2610 32 23,565EC&Gzne484La Palma Drive2 Camino Azul w/sAdams Street e/s3140 66 6,440EC&Gzne484Ladera Drive2 Fronterra Drive w/sEnd2510 36 18,360EC&Gzne484Palermo Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999EC&Gzne48444179 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIParkbrook Court1 Birchcrest Cir w/sCDS2230 32 11,405EC&Gzne484Sunberry Court1 Birchcrest Circle n/sCDS2120 32 5,376EC&Gzne484Verona Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999EC&Gzne484Airport Boulevard1 Monroe Street w/sMadison Avenue e/s25,100 82 300,000BC&Gzne383Alden Circle1 Seeley DriveEnd2580 36 20,880EC&Gzne483Avenida Alvarado6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne183Avenida Bermudas9 Calle Tampico n/sEND2515 46 19,690EC&Gzne183Avenida Madero7 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2565 32 18,080EC&Gzne183Avenida Rubio 4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960EC&Gzne183Avenida Rubio 5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2565 32 18,080EC&Gzne183Avenida Tujunga1 EndCalle Quinto w/s2550 32 17,600EC&Gzne183Avenida Villa 5 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne183Avenida Villa 6 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Navarro w/s21,180 32 37,760EC&Gzne183Birchcrest Circle1 Bayberry Ln n/sBayberry Ln n/s21,400 32 44,800EC&Gzne483Calle Arroba2 Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne583Calle Arroba13 Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s 2225 32 7,200EC&Gzne583Calle Arroba15 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne583Calle Cadiz1 Desert Club Drive e/sCalle Fortuna s/s2680 23 15,640EROLzne183Calle Hidalgo6Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhowerDrw/s2220327,040EC&Gzne183Calle Hidalgo6Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2220327,040EC&Gzne183Calle Hidalgo7 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne183Calle Potrero5 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne583Calle Sonora1 Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,240 32 103,680EC&Gzne183Coldbrook Lane1 Miles Avenue s/sSunbrook Ln n/s2150 36 5,400EC&Gzne483Diane Drive1 Bridgette Way w/sDebbie Dr e/s2615 37 22,755EC&Gzne483Madison Street6 Avenue 58 s/sAvenue 60 n/s45,630 82 391,660BC&Gzne383Madison Street03A N/S AVENUE 54S/S AVENUE 5245,365 80 364,820AC&Gzne383Malia Circle1 Ladera DriveCDS2170 32 8,919EC&Gzne483Memorial Place1 Monticello Ave e/sCDS2675 32 25,079EC&Gzne483Messina Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999EC&Gzne483Milan Court2 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999EC&Gzne483Morning Glory Court2 Verbena Ave w/sCDS2525 32 20,279EC&Gzne48345180 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIOcotillo Drive1 Adams Street e/sFronterra Drive w/s2575 36 20,700EC&Gzne483Parma Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999EC&Gzne483Pompeii Court1 Venice Dr w/sCDS2685 32 25,399EC&Gzne483Sweetbush Lane1 Buttercup Lane n/sCDS2545 32 20,919EC&Gzne483Torino Drive1 Genoa Dr w/sMilan Ct e/s21,850 37 68,450EC&Gzne483Via Del Monte1 Via Sevilla s/sVia Caliente s/s2315 37 11,655EC&Gzne483Woodberry Ln1 Adams St w/sSunbrook Ln e/s2120 36 4,320EC&Gzne483Alba Court1 Torino Dr n/sCDS2235 32 10,999EC&Gzne482Arosa Way1 Villeta Dr s/sLa Palma Drive n/s2280 36 10,080EC&Gzne482Avenida Alvarado2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,935 32 61,920EC&Gzne582Avenida Carranza3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360EC&Gzne582Avenida Cortez2 Calle Durango s/sCalle Sonora n/s2575 32 18,400EC&Gzne182Avenida Diaz5 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,295 32 41,440EC&Gzne182Avenida Juarez6 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2565 32 18,080EC&Gzne182Avenida Juarez7 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne182Avenida La Jarita1 Calle Quinto e/sCalle Rondo w/s2525 32 16,800EC&Gzne182Avenida Madero10 Avenida Montezuma e/sCalle Monterey n/s2350 33 11,550EC&Gzne582Avenida Martinez8 Eisenhower Dr e/sCalle Tampico s/s2500 36 18,000EC&Gzne182Avenida Mendoza6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s26203219,840EC&Gzne182Avenida Mendoza 6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s26203219,840EC&Gzne182Avenida Montezuma1 S End/Avenida MaderoCalle Nogales s/s25,405 32 172,960EC&Gzne182Avenida Navarro5 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne182Avenida Obregon4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,285 32 41,120EC&Gzne182Avenida Ramirez2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,935 32 61,920EC&Gzne582Avenida Ramirez3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360EC&Gzne582Avenida Ultimo1 W. EndCalle Rondo w/s21,170 32 37,440EC&Gzne182Avenue 621Monroe St w/sEnd23,680 26 95,680ANONzne382Blazing Star Trail1 Star Flower Trail n/sDune Palm Road e/s21,880 36 67,680EC&Gzne482Calico Circle1 Blazing Star Trail n/sCDS2490 32 19,159EC&Gzne482Calle Arroba3 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne582Calle Arroba4 Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne582Calle Arroba5 Avenida Diaz e/s Avenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne58246181 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Arroba6 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne582Calle Arroba7 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne582Calle Arroba8 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne582Calle Arroba9 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne582Calle Quinto1 Avenida Nuestra n/sLa Fonda s/s2600 32 19,200EC&Gzne182Calle Quinto2 La Fonda n/sCalle Tampico s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne182Calle Rondo2 Avenida Ultimo s/sCalle Tampico n/s21,275 32 40,800EC&Gzne182Camino Amarillo1 Octotillo Drive w/sCDS2380 32 15,639EC&Gzne482Camino Del Oro1 Camino Lavanda w/sOctotillo Drive e/s 2270 36 9,720EC&Gzne482Camino Del Oro2 Octotillo Drive w/sCamino Azul e/s2600 36 21,600EC&Gzne482Canterra Drive1 Octotillo Drive w/sMilago Drive2640 32 20,480EC&Gzne482Dandelion Drive2 Monticello Ave w/sVerbena Dr e/s2910 32 29,120EC&Gzne482Dandelion Drive3 Verbena Dr w/sCDS2525 32 20,279EC&Gzne482Hancock Court1 Liberty Ave w/sCDS2260 32 11,799EC&Gzne482Kaye Court1 Debbie Dr w/sCDS2350 32 14,679EC&Gzne482La Quinta Center1 Hwy 111 s/sAvenue 47 n/s21,370 40 54,800AC&Gzne282Ladera Drive1 Los Manos Drive w/sFronterra Drive n/s2350 36 12,600EC&Gzne482Las Vistas Drive3 Sanita Dr s/sForbes Cir n/s285 36 10,260EC&Gzne482Lowe Drive1Seeley Drive W/SNorth Harland Drive W/S28403630,240EC&Gzne482Lowe Drive1Seeley Drive W/SNorth Harland Drive W/S28403630,240EC&Gzne482Milago Drive 1 Canterra Drive s/sOctotillo Drive n/s2350 32 11,200EC&Gzne482Miles Avenue1 Jefferson Ave w/s (Westbound Only)Dune Palms Road w/s (Westbound)42,655 76 168,315BC&Gzne482Morning Glory Court1 Verbena Ave e/sCDS2595 32 22,519EC&Gzne482Palm Garden Place1 Cameo Palms n/sCDS2180 28 7,824EC&Gzne282Randolph Court1 Monticello Ave w/sCDS2190 32 9,559EC&Gzne482Saffron Court1 Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2400 32 16,279EC&Gzne482Sand Flower Place1 Cameo Plams n/sCDS2180 28 7,824EC&Gzne282Seeley Drive1 Forbes Circle s/sBradford Circle n/s2570 36 20,520EC&Gzne482Seeley Drive2 Bradford CircleMiles Avenue2470 73 29,570EC&Gzne482Singing Palms Drive2 Cameo Palms Drive CDS2200 32 8,299EC&Gzne282Venice Drive1 Fred Waring n/sNaples Rd s/s2125 47 3,875EC&Gzne482Via Coronado1 Forbes Circle s/sCDS2720 37 30,119EC&Gzne48247182 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIVia Sevilla1 Via Coronado w/sWashington St e/s22,185 37 80,845EC&Gzne482Washington Street13 Fred Waring Drive n/sCity Limit62,955 82 212,435BC&Gzne482Washington Street Frontal1 Washington Street w/s Singing Palms n/s 1185 18 3,330CC&Gzne282Williamstone Way1 Liberty Ave w/sMonticello Ave e/s2600 32 19,200EC&Gzne482Ambassador Circle1 Monticello Ave w/s CDS2250 32 11,479EC&Gzne481America Court1 Hemings Way s/sCDS2295 32 12,919EC&Gzne481Avenida Alvarado1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,935 32 61,920EC&Gzne581Avenida Alvarado4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960EC&Gzne181Avenida Alvarado8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2400 32 12,800EC&Gzne181Avenida Bermudas5 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Chillon n/s 43,120 61 190,320CC&Gzne581Avenida Carranza2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,930 32 61,760EC&Gzne581Avenida Nuestra2 Calle Kalima e/sCalle Guatemala w/s21,080 29 31,320EC&Gzne181Avenida Obregon1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,935 32 61,920EC&Gzne581Avenida Obregon2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,935 32 61,920EC&Gzne581Avenida Rubio 8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2615 32 19,680EC&Gzne181Avenida Vallejo1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,930 32 61,760EC&Gzne581Avenue 532 EndMonroe St w/s2815 50 40,750ENONzne381Avenue 601 Madison St w/sMonroe St w/s35,300 57 252,100AC&Gzne381Buttercup Lane2Blazing Star Trail s/sMarigold Lane n/s24203213,440EC&Gzne481Buttercup Lane2Blazing Star Trail s/sMarigold Lane n/s24203213,440EC&Gzne481Calle Arroba11 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Arroba12 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Arroba16 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Arroba17 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Arroba18 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2225 32 7,200EC&Gzne581Calle Chihuahua6 Avenida Carranza e/s Avenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Chihuahua7 Avenida Ramirez e/s Avenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Chillon1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s2180 32 5,760EC&Gzne581Calle Chillon3 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Ensenada7 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne181Calle Ensenada11 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne181Calle Ensenada14 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne18148183 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Ensenada16 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne181Calle Estado eb1 Desert Club Drive w/sAvenidas Bermudas e/s1615 30 18,450EC&Gzne181Calle Hidalgo4 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne181Calle Hidalgo5 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne181Calle Monterey3 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Monterey10 Avenida Herrera e/s Avenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne581Calle Temecula10 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2215 32 6,880EC&Gzne581Cindy Court1 Debbie Dr w/sCDS2350 32 14,679EC&Gzne481Cristol Place1 Villeta DriveCDS2190 32 10,125EC&Gzne481Declaration Court1 Monticello Ave w/sCDS2450 32 17,879EC&Gzne481Desert Air Street1 Desert Stream n/sCDS21,325 32 43,279EC&Gzne481Franklin Court1 Morris Ave s/sCDS2145 32 8,119EC&Gzne481Las Vistas Drive2 Vileta Dr s/sSanita Dr n/s615 36 22,140EC&Gzne481Liberty Avenue1 Morris Ave s/sDandelion Dr s/s2935 32 29,920EC&Gzne481Los Manos Drive1 Miles Avenue n/sOctotillo Drive e/s21,050 32 33,600EC&Gzne481Milan Court1 Naples Dr n/sTorino Dr n/s2765 36 27,540EC&Gzne481Morris Avenue2 Monticello Ave w/s CDS2460 32 18,199EC&Gzne481Nolan Circle1 North Harland DriveCDS2585 33 22,694EC&Gzne481North Harland Drive1Miles Avenue n/sWest Harland Drive s/s21,0003636,000EC&Gzne481North Harland Drive1Miles Avenue n/sWest Harland Drive s/s21,0003636,000EC&Gzne481Palm Royal1 Washington St e/sRome Dr. n/s32,715 53 143,495AC&Gzne481Tiara Place1 Villeta Drive n/sCDS2260 32 11,799EC&Gzne481Via Caliente1 Via Del Monte e/sEnd2340 37 12,580EC&Gzne481Avenida Alvarado5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240EC&Gzne180Avenida Juarez9 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2740 32 23,680EC&Gzne180Avenida Madero8 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 33 20,460EC&Gzne180Avenida Madero9 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2300 33 9,900EC&Gzne180Avenida Mendoza 3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s 21,990 32 63,680EC&Gzne580Avenida Montezuma4 Avenida Bermudas w/sEisenhower Dr e/s11,075 52 55,900EC&Gzne180Avenida Obregon3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360EC&Gzne580Avenida Ramirez4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960EC&Gzne180Avenida Ramirez5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2575 32 18,400EC&Gzne18049184 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Rubio 7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2535 32 17,120EC&Gzne180Avenida Villa 2 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,990 32 63,680EC&Gzne580Avenue 522 Washington Street w/sSilverrock Way e/s43,520 82 216,640BC&Gzne180Calle Arroba10 Avenida Ramirez e/s Avenida Vallejo w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne580Calle Cadiz2 Calle Fortuna s/sCalle Guatemala w/s2225 32 7,200EROLzne180Calle Chillon17 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2320 32 10,240EC&Gzne580Calle Ensenada9 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne180Calle Ensenada12 Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne180Calle Ensenada15 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne180Calle Fortuna1 Desert Club Drive e/sCalle Cadiz n/s2695 25 17,375EROLzne180Calle Iloilo1 Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne180Calle Kalima1 Avenida Nuestra n/sCDS2610 32 22,999EC&Gzne180Calle Potrero11 Avenida Velasco e/sAvenida Bernudas w/s2200 32 6,400EC&Gzne580Camino La Cresta1 Camino Del Oro n/sCDS2405 32 16,439EC&Gzne480Corporate Centre Drive2Adams St e/sCDS31,265 36 48,999EC&Gzne480Estelo Court1 Villeta DriveCDS2155 32 8,910EC&Gzne480Hemmings Way1 Monticello Ave w/sAmerica Ct w/s2285 32 9,120EC&Gzne480Independence Way1 Monticello Way w/sCDS2370 32 15,319EC&Gzne480Independence Way2Monticello Way e/sJefferson Ave w/s27453223,840EC&Gzne480Independence Way2Monticello Way e/sJefferson Ave w/s27453223,840EC&Gzne480Jefferson Street5 Avenue 48 shared n/sCity Limit shared31,010 62 62,620BC&Gzne280Jefferson Street08A Westward Ho Drive n/sMiles Ave s/s62,650 98 249,700AC&Gzne480Marigold Lane1 Blazing Star Trail s/sButtercup Lane s/s2975 32 31,200EC&Gzne480Morris Avenue1 Monticello Ave e/sLiberty Ave e/s2525 32 16,800EC&Gzne480Naples Drive1 Milan Ct w/sGenoa Dr e/s21,945 36 70,020EC&Gzne480Palm Royal2 Rome Dr. n/sFred Waring n/s2410 28 11,480ENONzne480Park Avenue1 Calle Tampico n/sAvenue 5022,730 40 109,200EC&Gzne180Ramblewood Ct1 Sunbrook LnEnd2320 32 13,719EC&Gzne480Verbena Drive1 Star Flower Trail s/sMiles Ave n/s2740 36 26,640EC&Gzne480Washington Street12 Via Sevilla n/sFred Waring Drive s/s61,670 88 128,900BC&Gzne480West Harland Drive1 North Harland Drive e/sLas Vistas Drive e/s2835 36 30,060EC&Gzne480Ashley Way1 Ashley Pl n/sDesert Stream Dr s/s2215 36 7,740EC&Gzne47950185 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Carranza1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,935 32 61,920EC&Gzne579Avenida Cortez1 Avenida Montezuma e/sCalle Colima s/s21,960 32 62,720EC&Gzne579Avenida Cortez3 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2625 32 20,000EC&Gzne179Avenida Diaz6 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2575 32 18,400EC&Gzne179Avenida Diaz8 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2450 32 14,400EC&Gzne179Avenida Herrera 3 Calle Colima s/sCalle Nogales s/s22,000 32 64,000EC&Gzne579Avenida Juarez8 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2380 32 12,160EC&Gzne179Avenida La Fonda2 Desert Club Drive w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s1630 64 40,320EC&Gzne179Avenida Madero1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,945 32 62,240EC&Gzne579Avenida Madero2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Arroba s/s21,290 32 41,280EC&Gzne579Avenida Mendoza 2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,940 32 62,080EC&Gzne579Avenida Naranja1 Calle Rondo w/sCalle Quinto e/s2510 32 16,320EC&Gzne179Avenida Obregon5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2565 32 18,080EC&Gzne179Avenida Rubio 3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360EC&Gzne579Avenida Vallejo4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960EC&Gzne179Avenida Velasco3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,990 32 63,680EC&Gzne579Avenida Velasco8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2630 32 23,549EC&Gzne179Bayberry Lane1 Coldbrook Ln e/sDeerbrook Ln w/s2850 36 30,600EC&Gzne479BLACKHAWK WAY1Dune Palms Road w/sAdams Street e/s32,60044114,400BC&Gzne279BLACKHAWK WAY1Dune Palms Road w/sAdams Street e/s32,60044114,400BC&Gzne279Buttercup Lane1 EndBlazing Star Trail n/s2450 32 14,400EC&Gzne479Calle Chihuahua1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2310 32 9,920EC&Gzne579Calle Chihuahua2 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chihuahua4 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chihuahua8 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chihuahua9 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chihuahua10 Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chihuahua11 Eisenhower Dr e/s Avenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chihuahua13 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chillon2 Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chillon4 Avenida Jaurez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chillon5 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne57951186 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Chillon10 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chillon13 Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chillon14 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Chillon15 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Ensenada10 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne179Calle Ensenada13 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne179Calle Ensenada17 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne179Calle Estado wb1 Desert Club Drive w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s2615 30 18,450EC&Gzne179Calle Hidalgo2 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne179Calle Monterey2 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2440 32 14,080EC&Gzne579Calle Monterey4 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Monterey5 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Monterey7 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Monterey8 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Monterey11 Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Monterey12 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Calle Nogales1 Avenida Juarez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s22,585 32 82,720EC&Gzne579Calle Temecula2 Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne579Camino Rosada1Camino Azul w/sOctotillo Drive w/s26553623,580EC&Gzne479Camino Rosada1Camino Azul w/sOctotillo Drive w/s26553623,580EC&Gzne479Commerce Court1 Corporate Centre Dr s/sCDS2190 36 10,299EC&Gzne479Diane Drive2 Debbie Dr w/sCDS2350 32 11,200EC&Gzne479Golden Sands1 Cameo Palms DriveCDS2180 28 6,939EC&Gzne279Iris Court1 Blazing Star Trail w/sCDS2350 32 14,679EC&Gzne479Jefferson Street7 Vista Grande s/sFiesta Drive n/s2765 62 47,430BNONzne479Las Vistas Drive1 Fred Waring Drive s/sVileta Dr n/s2425 36 28,690EC&Gzne479Monroe Street5 2660' s/o Airport (southbound) Airport Blvd s/s (southbound) 32,660 41 109,060BC&Gzne379San Marino Court1 Venice Dr w/sCDS2685 32 25,399EC&Gzne479Washington Street8 Simon Drive s/sHighway 111 s/s8965 99 80,885BC&Gzne279Westward Ho Drive1 Jefferson St w/s (Eastbound Only) Dune Palms Rd e/s (Eastbound)22,620 30 78,600EC&Gzne479Winter Cove Court1 Summer View Way e/sCDS2420 32 13,440EC&Gzne179Adams Street1 Avenue 48 n/sHighway 111 s/s42,895 81 180,170EC&Gzne27852187 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Bermudas7 Calle Chillon n/sCalle Tecate n/s23,195 41 130,995CC&Gzne578Avenida Herrera 4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,295 32 41,440EC&Gzne178Avenida Madero4 Calle Colima n/sCalle Monterey s/s2635 32 20,320EC&Gzne578Avenida Martinez3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,990 32 63,680EC&Gzne578Avenida Obregon9 Avenida Alvarado w/s CDS2625 32 18,763EC&Gzne178Avenida Ramirez6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2610 32 19,520EC&Gzne178Avenida Rubio 6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2615 32 19,680EC&Gzne178Avenida Vallejo3 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360EC&Gzne578Avenida Velasco03a Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,300 32 41,600EC&Gzne178Calle Amigo1 Avenida Bermudas e/sDesert Club Drive w/s2645 24 15,480EC&Gzne178Calle Chihuahua3 Avenida Rubio e/s Avenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne578Calle Chihuahua14 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro e/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne578Calle Chihuahua15 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne578Calle Chillon9 Avenida Carrenza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne578Calle Durango2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s21,250 32 40,000EC&Gzne178Calle Ensenada8 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne178Calle Guatemala1 Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne178Calle Jacumba 1 Avenida La Fonda s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne178Calle Monterey1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s2235327,520EC&Gzne578Calle Monterey1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s2235327,520EC&Gzne578Calle Monterey14 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne578Calle Monterey15 Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne578Calle Paloma2 Calle Tampico s/sLa Fonda n/s2625 32 20,000EC&Gzne178Calle Sonora2 Eisenhower Dr e/s Avenida Bermudas w/s21,250 32 40,000EC&Gzne178Calle Tampico3 Washington Street e/sPark Avenue e/s22,670 36 96,120EC&Gzne178Cameo Dunes Place1 Cameo Palms n/sCDS2185 28 7,079EC&Gzne278Coldbrook Lane2 Sunbrook Ln s/s Woodberry Ln s/s22,870 36 103,320EC&Gzne478Corporate Centre Drive1 Dune Palm Rd w/sCDS3625 36 22,500EC&Gzne478Desert Club Drive2 Calle Tampico n/sCDS21,000 35 35,000EC&Gzne178Dune Palms Road2 Highway 111 n/sWestward Ho Drive s/s32,560 51 130,560BC&Gzne478Jefferson Street1 City LimitsFred Waring Dr n/s33,285 46 151,110AC&Gzne478Jefferson Street9 Miles Avenue n/s sharedFred Waring Drive s/s sha32,565 42 107,730BNONzne47853188 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIMain Street1 Desert Club Dr e/sAvenida La Fonda n/s2900 32 28,800EROLzne178Monroe Street6 Airport Blvd n/s (southbound)1985' n/o Airport Bl (southbound)21,985 32 63,520BC&Gzne378Monticello Avenue1 Miles Ave n/sFred Waring s/s22,710 32 86,720EC&Gzne478Shadwell Circle1 Monticello Ave w/sCDS2300 32 13,079EC&Gzne478Star Flower Trail1 Dune Palms Road e/sCDS21,200 36 46,679EC&Gzne478Verbena Drive2 Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2400 32 16,279EC&Gzne478Washington Street5 Eisenhower Drive n/sAvenue 47 n/s64,440 92 360,780BC&Gzne278Avenida Carranza4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,280 32 40,960EC&Gzne177Avenida Carranza6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2615 32 19,680EC&Gzne177Avenida Diaz4 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,980 32 63,360EC&Gzne577Avenida Herrera 1 CDSCalle Madrid s/s21,855 32 61,376EC&Gzne577Avenida Herrera 2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,930 32 61,760EC&Gzne577Avenida Herrera 5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2555 32 17,760EC&Gzne177Avenida Juarez4 Calle Colima n/sCalle Chihuahua s/s21,270 32 40,640EC&Gzne577Avenida Madero3 Calle Arroba n/sCalle Colima s/s2625 32 20,000EC&Gzne577Avenida Martinez2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,940 32 62,080EC&Gzne577Avenida Martinez5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2560 32 17,920EC&Gzne177Avenida Morales1 Avenida Montezuma s/sCalle Durango n/s2600 32 19,200EC&Gzne177Avenida Navarro3Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,2803240,960EC&Gzne177Avenida Navarro3Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,2803240,960EC&Gzne177Avenida Ramirez1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,935 32 61,920EC&Gzne577Avenida Tujunga2 Calle Quinto e/sCalle Rondo w/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne177Avenue 524 Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street e/s35,215 65 258,975BNONzne277Bradford Circle1 Seeley DriveEnd2640 36 23,040EC&Gzne477Calle Arroba1 Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s2255 32 8,160EC&Gzne577Calle Chihuahua5 Avenida Obregon e/s Avenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Chihuahua12 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Chillon6 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Chillon7 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Chillon8 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carrenza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Chillon12 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Chillon16 Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne57754189 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Colima1 Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,260 32 104,320EC&Gzne577Calle Colima2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s21,250 32 40,000EC&Gzne577Calle Hidalgo1 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2225 32 7,200EC&Gzne177Calle Hueneme1 Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne177Calle Monterey13 Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Monterey16 Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Potrero6 Avenida Obregon e/sAvendia Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Calle Temecula11 Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne577Cameo Palm Drive1 Singing Palms s/sHighland Palms n/s21,740 32 55,680EC&Gzne277Camino Lavanda1CDSCDS21,025 32 39,757EC&Gzne477Carrie Lane1 Victoria Drive s/sAshley Place s/s2525 36 18,900EC&Gzne477Crestview Terrace1 Highland Palms s/sCameo Palms n/s2470 28 13,160EC&Gzne277Eisenhower Drive4 Avenue 50 s/sCalle Tampico n/s22,430 50 121,500BC&Gzne277Eisenhower Drive05A Avenue 52 s/sCalle Nogales s/s42,600 72 187,200BC&Gzne177Fiesta Drive1 Jefferson Street w/sRoadrunner Lane e/s21,480 25 37,000EC&Gzne477Foxtail Circle1 Buttercup Lane s/sCDS2450 32 17,879EC&Gzne477Goldenrod Circle1 Buttercup Lane n/sCDS2540 32 20,759EC&Gzne477La Palma Drive1 Adams Street w/sLas Vistas e/s21,600 36 57,600EC&Gzne477Monroe Street1Ave 62 n/sAve 61 n/s23,3002685,800ANONzne377Monroe Street1Ave 62 n/sAve 61 n/s23,3002685,800ANONzne377Ocotillo Drive2 Fronterra DriveCDS21,760 36 61,680EC&Gzne477Washington Street7 Avenue 47 n/sSimon Drive s/s51,780 86 153,080BC&Gzne277Adams Street6 Miles Ave n/sFred Waring Drive s/s52,575 60 146,775BC&Gzne476Adams Street8 Fred Warring Dr n/sDarby Rd s/s21,975 32 57,720BC&Gzne476Ashley Place1 Carrie Ln e/sAshley Way e/s2800 36 28,800EC&Gzne476Avenida Alvarado7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2650 32 20,800EC&Gzne176Avenida Carranza5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240EC&Gzne176Avenida Diaz3 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,940 32 62,080EC&Gzne576Avenida La Fonda3 Calle Tamazula e/sCalle Rondo w/s11,255 50 62,750EC&Gzne176Avenida Navarro1 Calle Chillon n/sCalle Colima s/s21,280 32 40,960EC&Gzne576Avenida Ramirez7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,285 32 41,120EC&Gzne176Avenida Rubio 2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,940 32 62,080EC&Gzne57655190 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Velasco2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,925 32 61,600EC&Gzne576Avenida Villa 4 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240EC&Gzne176Avenue 543 W/S Jefferson AveEnd22,500 50 125,000EC&Gzne376Bayberry Lane3 Sunbrook Ln e/sAdams St w/s2130 36 4,680EC&Gzne476Cahuilla Park Road1 Jefferson Ave w/sEnd22,185 30 65,550BNONzne176Calle Hidalgo3 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne176Calle Nogales2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s21,255 32 40,160EC&Gzne576Calle Temecula7 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne576Calle Temecula9 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2215 32 6,880EC&Gzne576Camino Azul1 CDSCamino Rosada n/s2980 36 33,230EC&Gzne476Fred Waring Drive1 Jefferson Street w/sDune Palms Road w/s32,650 70 185,500BC&Gzne476Jefferson Street8 Fiesta Drive n/sWestward ho Drive s/s21,150 55 45,250BNONzne476Rockberry Court1 Coldbrook Ln w/sCDS2385 32 16,365EC&Gzne476Arosa Way2 La Palma Drive s/sSanita Drive n/s2290 36 10,440EC&Gzne475Avenida Diaz1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,940 32 62,080BC&Gzne575Avenida Herrera 6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne175Avenida Juarez1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,950 32 62,400EC&Gzne575Avenida Rubio 1 Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s21,950 32 62,400EC&Gzne575Avenida Vallejo5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s25703218,240EC&Gzne175Avenida Vallejo5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s25703218,240EC&Gzne175Avenida Vallejo7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,295 33 42,735EC&Gzne175Avenida Villa 3 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,285 32 41,120EC&Gzne175Calle Chillon11 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne575Calle Obispo1 EndCalle Tampico n/s2340 32 10,880EC&Gzne175Calle Obispo2 Calle Tampico s/sEnd2345 32 11,040EC&Gzne175Calle Potrero1 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne575Calle Potrero7 Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne575Calle Potrero8 Avenida Ramirez e/sAvendia Vallejo w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne575Calle Potrero9 Avenida Vallejo e/sAvendia Herrera w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne575Calle Potrero10 Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco e/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne575Calle Temecula3 Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne575Calle Temecula6 Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne57556191 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCICalle Temecula12 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez e/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne575Carmen Place1 Villeta Drive n/sCDS2265 32 12,525EC&Gzne475Dandelion Drive1 Monticello Dr e/sLiberty Ave w/s2790 32 25,280EC&Gzne475Highland Palms1 Washington Street w/sEnd21,210 32 38,720EC&Gzne275Jefferson Street2 Avenue 54 n/sAvenue 52 s/s65,265 98 451,290EC&Gzne375Jefferson Street3 Avenue 52 n/sAvenue 50 s/s65,120 95 407,840BC&Gzne275Jefferson Street4 Avenue 50 s/s sharedAvenue 48 s/s shared35,255 42 220,710BC&Gzne275Miles Avenue3 Dune Palms Road w/sWashington Street e/s56,170 82 505,940BC&Gzne475Sanita Drive1 Arosa Way s/sCDS21,720 36 65,039EC&Gzne475Villeta Drive1 Sanita Drive n/sSonesta Drive s/s23,600 36 129,600EC&Gzne475Avenida Carranza8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2655 32 20,960EC&Gzne174Avenida Diaz9 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2690 32 22,080EC&Gzne174Avenida Herrera 7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,275 32 40,800EC&Gzne174Avenida Juarez3 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,930 32 61,760EC&Gzne574Avenida La Fonda1 Desert Club Dr e/sWashington w/s21,990 32 63,680EC&Gzne174Avenida Martinez1 Avenida Bermudas e/sCalle Madrid s/s2785 32 25,120EC&Gzne574Avenida Navarro2 Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s21,990 32 63,680EC&Gzne574Avenida Obregon7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2875 32 28,000EC&Gzne174Avenida Obregon8Avenida Montezuma n/sAvenida Montezuma res s/s290322,880EC&Gzne174Avenida Obregon8Avenida Montezuma n/sAvenida Montezuma res s/s290322,880EC&Gzne174Avenida Vallejo2 Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s21,930 32 61,760EC&Gzne574Avenida Velasco4 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango n/s2580 32 18,560EC&Gzne174Calle Durango1 Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,460 32 110,720EC&Gzne174Calle Guaymas1 Avenida Tujunga s/sAvenida Naranja n/s2625 32 20,000EC&Gzne174Calle Temecula4 Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne574Calle Temecula5 Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne574Forbes Circle1 Seeley e/sVia Coronado E/S2830 36 29,880EC&Gzne474Mariposa Court1 Blazing Star Trail n/sCDS2430 32 17,239EC&Gzne474Paloma Court1 Calle Paloma w/sEnd2310 32 9,920EC&Gzne274Washington Street9 Highway 111 n/sMiles Avenue n/s62,845 86 217,830BC&Gzne474Avenida Diaz7 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne173Avenida Mendoza 4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,285 32 41,120EC&Gzne17357192 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIAvenida Mendoza 5 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2570 32 18,240EC&Gzne173Avenida Obregon6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2620 32 19,840EC&Gzne173Avenida Velasco1 CDSCalle Madrid s/s21,550 32 51,541EC&Gzne573Avenida Velasco5 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2630 32 20,160EC&Gzne173Avenue 602 Monroe St e/s City Limits21,335 25 33,375ANONzne373Bayberry Lane2 Deerbrook Ln e/s Sunbrook Ln w/s2220 36 7,920EC&Gzne473Calle Madrid2 Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2600 32 19,200EC&Gzne573Calle Tamazula1 Avenida NuestraLa Fonda s/s2600 32 19,200EC&Gzne173Calle Temecula1 Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne573Calle Temecula8 Avenida Ramirez w/sAvenida Vallejo w/s 2220 32 7,040EC&Gzne573Cloud View Way1 Summer View Way e/sDesert Fall Way s/s21,130 32 36,160EC&Gzne173Desert Fall Way1 Summer View Way w/sCloud View Way w\s2665 32 21,280EC&Gzne173Eisenhower Drive3 Avenida Fernando s/sAvenue 50 s/s41,845 71 111,675BC&Gzne273Eisenhower Drive8 Calle Nogales s/sAvenida Bermudas n/s45,225 72 325,920BC&Gzne573Fred Waring Drive4 Adams Street w/sVenice Dr w/s62,585 91 198,565BC&Gzne473Washington Street11 Miles Avenue n/sVia Sevilla n/s61,600 99 137,680BC&Gzne473Avenida Carranza7 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,200 32 38,400EC&Gzne172Avenida Martinez4 Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s21,285 32 41,120EC&Gzne172Avenida Mendoza1CDSCalle Madrid s/s2125326,016EC&Gzne572Avenida Mendoza 1CDSCalle Madrid s/s2125326,016EC&Gzne572Avenida Navarro4 Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2575 32 18,400EC&Gzne172Avenida Vallejo6 Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2625 33 20,625EC&Gzne172Avenida Velasco6 Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s21,300 32 41,600EC&Gzne172Calle Madrid1 Avenida Cortez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,100 32 99,200EC&Gzne572Calle Yucatan1 Avenida Alvarado w/sAvenida Juarez e/s2845 32 27,040EC&Gzne172Dune Palms Road1 Avenue 48Highway 111 s/s22,650 68 180,200EC&Gzne272Monroe Street4 Ave 58 n/s shared2660' s/o Airport (southbound) 22,650 32 84,800BNONzne372Monroe Street8 Avenue 54 s/s (southbound)Avenue 53 n/s (southbound) 12,700 13 35,100BNONzne372Sonesta Way1 Villeta Drive n/sVilleta Drive n/s21,120 36 40,320EC&Gzne472Springbrook Court1 Sunbrook Ln n/sCDS2135 32 7,799EC&Gzne472Washington Street4 Avenida Montero n/sEisenhower Drive n/s71,890 112 211,680BC&Gzne272Adams Street4 Highway 111 n/sMiles Avenue s/s54,845 60 261,600BC&Gzne47158193 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCIDate Palm Drive1 Sagebrush Avenue s/sSaguaro Drive n/s2520 32 16,640EC&Gzne271Deerbrook Circle1 Stonebrook Ct e/s Bayberry Ln n/s2470 32 15,040EC&Gzne471Deerbrook Circle2 Bayberry St s/sStonebrook Ct w/s2920 32 29,440EC&Gzne471Monroe Street2 Ave 61 n/sAve 60 n/s22,040 32 65,280AC&Gzne371Monroe Street3 Ave 60 n/s (southbound)Ave 58 n/s (southbound)15,380 14 75,320ANONzne371Sagebrush Avenue1 160' w/o Date Palm Drive Washington Street e/s21,350 32 43,200EC&Gzne271Saguaro Drive1 CDSDATE PALM W/S21,260 32 41,940EC&Gzne271Calle Cadiz3 Desert Club w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s2640 25 16,000EROLzne170Wakefield Circle1 Coldbrook Ln s/sCold Brook Ln s/s21,950 32 62,400EC&Gzne470Avenida Ramirez8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2630 32 22,624EC&Gzne169Avenue 525 Madison Street e/s (eastbound) Monroe St w/s (eastbound) 25,275 32 124,800AC&Gzne269Bottlebrush Drive1 CDSDate Palm Avenue w\s21,260 32 41,939EC&Gzne269Calle Barcelona1 Desert Club Drive w/s Avenida Bermudas e/s2645 24 15,480EROLzne169Desert Club Drive1 Avenue 52 n/sCalle Tampico s/s21,865 35 65,275EC&Gzne169Dune Palms Road3 Westward Ho Drive s/sMiles Rd s/s32,735 60 159,300BC&Gzne469Jefferson Street6 Highway 111 n/sVista Grande s/s6685 104 66,440BC&Gzne469Avenida Mendoza 8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Tampico s/s2375 32 12,000EC&Gzne168Avenida Villa 7 Avenida Navarro w/sCalle Tampico s/s2535 32 17,120EC&Gzne168Jefferson Street10Avenue 58 s/sS/S QUARRY LN21,6802847,040BNONzne368Jefferson Street10Avenue 58 s/sS/S QUARRY LN21,6802847,040BNONzne368Stonebrook Court1 Deerbrook Cir n/sCDS2290 32 12,759EC&Gzne468Washington Street Frontal2 Singing Palms n/s Highland Palms n/s 21,800 30 54,000CC&Gzne268Avenida Vallejo8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2635 33 24,340EC&Gzne167Calle Sinaloa1 Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s23,310 32 105,920EC&Gzne166Washington Street Frontal3 Highland Palm n/s Washington St w/s 21,000 30 30,000CC&Gzne266Fred Waring Drive04a Venice Dr w/sPalm Royal w/s61,125 86 81,000BC&Gzne465Summer View Way1 Springtime Way n/sDesert Fall Way n/s2480 32 15,360EC&Gzne165Sunbrook Ln1 Woodberry Ln s/sCDS22,600 36 96,720EC&Gzne465Avenida Herrera 8 Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2625 32 21,536EC&Gzne164Avenida Navarro7 Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Tampico s/s 2615 32 19,680EC&Gzne164Hwy 1111 Washington St w/sAdams St w/s63,665 108 395,820AC&Gzne264Springtime Way1 Desert Club e/sCDS21,240 36 43,040EC&Gzne16459194 City of La QuintaPCI Report 2020 Descending PCINameSectionFromToLnsLength Width True AreaRank Edge ZonePCISummerbrook Court1 Coldbrook Ln w/sCDS2150 32 8,279EC&Gzne464Fred Waring Drive5 Palm Royal w/sWashington Street e/s61,525 105 150,125BC&Gzne462Avenue 505 Jefferson Street e/s sharMadison Street w/s shared 25,190 30 155,700BC&Gzne261Avenue 521 Avenida Bermudas e/sWashington St w/s42,735 82 178,280EC&Gzne159Hwy 1112 Adams St w/sJefferson St w/s65,325 100 532,500AC&Gzne257Avenida Montezuma3 Avenida Carranza w/sEisenhower Dr w/s21,275 37 47,175EC&Gzne156Avenida Villa 1 Avenida Bermudas e/sCalle Colima s/s21,700 32 54,400EC&Gzne556Frances Hack Ln1 Avenida Bermudas e/sCDS2770 28 34,005EC&Gzne154Dune Palms Road4 Miles Avenue n/sFred Waring Dr s/s42,565 61 156,465BC&Gzne452Avenue 471 Washington Street e/sAdams Street w/s22,515 43 108,145EC&Gzne246Avenue 501 Eisenhower Drive e/s Washington St w/s 43,965 66 232,990EC&Gzne244Seasons Way1 Calle Tampico n/sSpringtime Way s/s2450 36 16,200EC&Gzne141Monroe Street9 Avenue 53 n/s (southbound)Avenue 52 s/s (southbound) 12,560 13 33,280BNONzne334684,980 29,702,050 80Total Length (LF) 684,980LFTotal Area (SF)29,702,050SFTotal Centerline Miles129.7MilesTotal Centerline Miles129.7MilesAverage PCI80PCI60195 City of La Quinta Citywide Pavement Management Program Final Report January 2021 Section V SECTION V PROJECTED WORK PROGRAMS In developing an annual expenditure level required to maintain the street network at its current average PCI level, two (2) budget scenarios were studied, as follows:  $1,000,000 ANNUAL (CURRENT) BUDGET– This scenario will show the work recommended for all maintenance types with a $1 million annual budget, the PCI ratings do lower, and the deferred maintenance does increase. The budget was run for a five year period.  UNLIMITED BUDGET– This scenario will show the work recommended for all maintenance types for all roadways currently requiring maintenance. The Unlimited Budget represents the current backlog of $16.2 Million. The work programs within this Draft Report are designed to assist the City Staff in developing a budget scenario that best suits the City’s maintenance needs, goals, and strategies. Sound engineering still needs to be applied to each maintenance segment. The maintenance codes are as follows:  None – No maintenance recommended at this time.  CS – Crack Sealing o Widths greater than 1” – Mastic Crack Sealing  SS – Slurry Seal  DO – Digouts  GR – Grind (Edge or Full Width)  OL – Overlay Varying maintenances are used at different PCI levels and are due to conditions / distresses found in the Inspection / Survey process. 61196 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2021‐22NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAshwood Court1Bayberry Ave s/sCDS150 34 8,559zne484 CS/SS 92 4,194$ Avenue 521Avenida Bermudas e/sWashington St w/s2,735 82 178,280zne159 DO/CS/SS 79 301,293$ Bayberry Lane1Coldbrook Ln e/sDeerbrook Ln w/s850 36 30,600zne479 CS/SS 87 14,994$ Bayberry Lane2Deerbrook Ln e/s Sunbrook Ln w/s220 36 7,920zne473 CS/SS 81 3,881$ Bayberry Lane3Sunbrook Ln e/sAdams St w/s130 36 4,680zne476 CS/SS 84 2,293$ Birchcrest Circle1Bayberry Ln n/sBayberry Ln n/s1,400 32 44,800zne483 CS/SS 91 21,952$ Calle Arroba1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s255 32 8,160zne577 CS 77 3,998$ Calle Arroba2Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s220 32 7,040zne583 CS 83 550$ Calle Arroba3Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s220 32 7,040zne582 CS 82 462$ Calle Arroba4Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s220 32 7,040zne582 CS 82 396$ Calle Arroba5Avenida Diaz e/s Avenida Rubio w/s220 32 7,040zne582 CS 82 396$ Calle Arroba6Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s220 32 7,040zne582 CS 82 396$ Calle Arroba7Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s220 32 7,040zne582 CS 82 462$ Calle Arroba8Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s220 32 7,040zne582 CS 82 396$ Calle Arroba9Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne582 CS 82 264$ Calle Arroba10Avenida Ramirez e/s Avenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne580 CS 80 528$ Calle Arroba11Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s 220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 396$ Calle Arroba12Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 462$ Calle Arroba13Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s225 32 7,200zne583 CS 83 700$ Calle Arroba14Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s220 32 7,040zne584 CS 84 350$ Calle Arroba15Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s220 32 7,040zne583 CS 83 500$ Calle Arroba16Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 462$ Calle Arroba17Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 150$ Calle Arroba18Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s225 32 7,200zne581 CS 81 150$ Calle Chihuahua1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Diaz w/s310 32 9,920zne579 CS 79 600$ Calle Chihuahua2Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 984$ Calle Chihuahua3Avenida Rubio e/s Avenida Alvarado w/s220 32 7,040zne578 CS 78 894$ Calle Chihuahua4Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 528$ Calle Chihuahua5Avenida Obregon e/s Avenida Carranza w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 940$ Calle Chihuahua6Avenida Carranza e/s Avenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 150$ Calle Chihuahua7Avenida Ramirez e/s Avenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 150$ Calle Chihuahua8Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 474$ 62197 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2021‐22NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Chihuahua9Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 552$ Calle Chihuahua10Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 474$ Calle Chihuahua11Eisenhower Dr e/s Avenida Martinez w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 684$ Calle Chihuahua12Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 996$ Calle Chihuahua13Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 175$ Calle Chihuahua14Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro e/s220 32 7,040zne578 CS 78 200$ Calle Chihuahua15Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s220 32 7,040zne578 CS 78 898$ Calle Chillon1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s180 32 5,760zne581 CS 81 500$ Calle Chillon2Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 900$ Calle Chillon3Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 550$ Calle Chillon4Avenida Jaurez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 900$ Calle Chillon5Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 900$ Calle Chillon6Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 1,300$ Calle Chillon7Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 1,300$ Calle Chillon8Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carrenza w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 1,300$ Calle Chillon9Avenida Carrenza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne578 CS 78 1,000$ Calle Chillon10Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 900$ Calle Chillon11Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 1,332$ Calle Chillon12Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 548$ Calle Chillon13Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 850$ Calle Chillon14Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 900$ Calle Chillon15Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 700$ Calle Chillon16Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 548$ Calle Chillon17Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s320 32 10,240zne580 CS 80 1,200$ Calle Colima1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s3,260 32 104,320zne577 CS 77 5,250$ Calle Colima2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s1,250 32 40,000zne577 CS 77 3,520$ Calle Durango1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s3,460 32 110,720zne174 CS 74 7,200$ Calle Durango2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s1,250 32 40,000zne178 CS 78 2,948$ Calle Ensenada1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s200 32 6,400zne186 CS 86 100$ Calle Ensenada2Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s220 32 7,040zne187 CS 87 100$ Calle Ensenada3Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s220 32 7,040zne185 CS 85 200$ Calle Ensenada4Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s220 32 7,040zne187 CS 87 100$ 63198 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2021‐22NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Ensenada5Avenida Rubio e/s Avenida Alvarado w/s220 32 7,040zne186 CS 86 100$ Calle Ensenada6Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s220 32 7,040zne185 CS 85 150$ Calle Ensenada7Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s220 32 7,040zne181 CS 81 750$ Calle Ensenada8Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne178 CS 78 1,200$ Calle Ensenada9Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne180 CS 80 900$ Calle Ensenada10Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s220 32 7,040zne179 CS 79 800$ Calle Ensenada11Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s220 32 7,040zne181 CS 81 850$ Calle Ensenada12Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s220 32 7,040zne180 CS 80 1,000$ Calle Ensenada13Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s220 32 7,040zne179 CS 79 1,050$ Calle Ensenada14Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s220 32 7,040zne181 CS 81 664$ Calle Ensenada15Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s220 32 7,040zne180 CS 80 950$ Calle Ensenada16Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s220 32 7,040zne181 CS 81 800$ Calle Ensenada17Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s220 32 7,040zne179 CS 79 1,100$ Calle Hidalgo1Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s225 32 7,200zne177 CS 77 1,200$ Calle Hidalgo2Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne179 CS 79 800$ Calle Hidalgo3Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne176 CS 76 1,000$ Calle Hidalgo4Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s220 32 7,040zne181 CS 81 600$ Calle Hidalgo5Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s220 32 7,040zne181 CS 81 500$ Calle Hidalgo6Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s220 32 7,040zne183 CS 83 400$ Calle Hidalgo7Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s220 32 7,040zne183 CS 83 400$ Calle Hidalgo8Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s220 32 7,040zne184 CS 84 150$ Calle Hidalgo9Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s220 32 7,040zne184 CS 84 300$ Calle Hidalgo10Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s220 32 7,040zne184 CS 84 200$ Calle Hidalgo11Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s220 32 7,040zne185 CS 85 150$ Calle Madrid1Avenida Cortez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s3,100 32 99,200zne572 CS 72 5,000$ Calle Madrid2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s600 32 19,200zne573 CS 73 1,100$ Calle Monterey1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s235 32 7,520zne578 CS 78 800$ Calle Monterey2Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Diaz w/s440 32 14,080zne579 CS 79 1,000$ Calle Monterey3Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 200$ Calle Monterey4Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 300$ Calle Monterey5Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 250$ Calle Monterey6Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s220 32 7,040zne589 CS 89 200$ 64199 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2021‐22NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Monterey7Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 500$ Calle Monterey8Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 600$ Calle Monterey9Avenida Vallajo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s220 32 7,040zne589 CS 89 200$ Calle Monterey10Avenida Herrera e/s Avenida Velasco w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS 81 175$ Calle Monterey11Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 250$ Calle Monterey12Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 500$ Calle Monterey13Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 800$ Calle Monterey14Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s220 32 7,040zne578 CS 78 600$ Calle Monterey15Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s220 32 7,040zne578 CS 78 400$ Calle Monterey16Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 922$ Calle Nogales1Avenida Juarez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2,585 32 82,720zne579 CS 79 2,300$ Calle Nogales2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s1,255 32 40,160zne576 CS 76 1,400$ Calle Potrero1Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 350$ Calle Potrero2Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s220 32 7,040zne584 CS 84 260$ Calle Potrero3Avenida Diaz e/s Avenida Rubio w/s225 32 7,200zne589 CS 89 262$ Calle Potrero4Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s225 32 7,200zne584 CS 84 195$ Calle Potrero5Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s220 32 7,040zne583 CS 83 190$ Calle Potrero6Avenida Obregon e/sAvendia Carranza w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 800$ Calle Potrero7Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s 220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 600$ Calle Potrero8Avenida Ramirez e/sAvendia Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 600$ Calle Potrero9Avenida Vallejo e/sAvendia Herrera w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 600$ Calle Potrero10Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco e/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 1,800$ Calle Potrero11Avenida Velasco e/sAvenida Bernudas w/s200 32 6,400zne580 CS 80 550$ Calle Sinaloa1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s3,310 32 105,920zne166 CS 66 2,500$ Calle Sinaloa2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s1,265 82 84,830zne195 CS 95 150$ Calle Sonora1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s3,240 32 103,680zne183 CS 83 1,500$ Calle Sonora2Eisenhower Dr e/s Avenida Bermudas w/s1,250 32 40,000zne178 CS 78 1,100$ Calle Tecate1Avenida Bermudas e/sAvenida Madero w/s2,250 34 76,500zne588 CS 88 1,600$ Calle Temecula1Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s220 32 7,040zne573 CS 73 1,200$ Calle Temecula2Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS 79 500$ Calle Temecula3Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 750$ Calle Temecula4Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s220 32 7,040zne574 CS 74 900$ 65200 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2021‐22NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Temecula5Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s 220 32 7,040zne574 CS 74 900$ Calle Temecula6Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 800$ Calle Temecula7Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne576 CS 76 600$ Calle Temecula8Avenida Ramirez w/sAvenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne573 CS 73 1,000$ Calle Temecula9Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s215 32 6,880zne576 CS 76 900$ Calle Temecula10Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s215 32 6,880zne581 CS 81 750$ Calle Temecula11Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS 77 1,100$ Calle Temecula12Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez e/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS 75 900$ Coldbrook Lane1Miles Avenue s/sSunbrook Ln n/s150 36 5,400zne483 CS/SS 91 2,800$ Coldbrook Lane2Sunbrook Ln s/s Woodberry Ln s/s2,870 36 103,320zne478 CS/SS 86 50,627$ Deerbrook Circle1Stonebrook Ct e/s Bayberry Ln n/s470 32 15,040zne471 CS/SS 79 7,370$ Deerbrook Circle2Bayberry St s/sStonebrook Ct w/s920 32 29,440zne471 CS/SS 79 14,426$ Desert Club Drive1Avenue 52 n/sCalle Tampico s/s1,865 35 65,275zne169 DO/CS/SS 89 110,315$ Desert Club Drive2Calle Tampico n/sCDS1,000 35 35,000zne178 CS/SS 86 17,150$ Parkbrook Court1Birchcrest Cir w/sCDS230 32 11,405zne484 CS/SS 92 5,588$ Ramblewood Ct1Sunbrook LnEnd320 32 13,719zne480 CS/SS 88 6,722$ Rockberry Court1Coldbrook Ln w/sCDS385 32 16,365zne476 CS/SS 84 8,019$ Springbrook Court1Sunbrook Ln n/sCDS135 32 7,799zne472 CS/SS 80 3,850$ Springtime Way1Desert Club e/sCDS1,240 36 43,040zne164 DO/CS/SS 84 72,750$ Stonebrook Court1Deerbrook Cir n/sCDS290 32 12,759zne468 DO/CS/SS 88 21,650$ Summerbrook Court1Coldbrook Ln w/sCDS150 32 8,279zne464 DO/CS/SS 84 13,992$ Sunberry Court1Birchcrest Circle n/sCDS120 32 5,376zne484 CS/SS 92 2,634$ Sunbrook Ln1Woodberry Ln s/sCDS2,600 36 96,720zne465 DO/CS/SS 85 163,457$ Wakefield Circle1Coldbrook Ln s/sCold Brook Ln s/s1,950 32 62,400zne470 CS/SS 78 30,576$ Woodberry Ln1Adams St w/sSunbrook Ln e/s120 36 4,320zne483 CS/SS 91 2,117$ 994,280$ 66201 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2022‐23NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenida Alvarado1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,935 32 61,920zne581 CS 81 1,750$ Avenida Alvarado2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,935 32 61,920zne582 CS 82 1,250$ Avenida Alvarado3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,985 32 63,520zne584 CS 84 1,125$ Avenida Alvarado4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,280 32 40,960zne181 CS 81 775$ Avenida Alvarado5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s570 32 18,240zne180 CS 80 425$ Avenida Alvarado6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne183 CS 83 535$ Avenida Alvarado7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s650 32 20,800zne176 CS 76 1,100$ Avenida Alvarado8Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s400 32 12,800zne181 CS 81 1,400$ Avenida Bermudas1Calle Tampico s/sCalle Sinaloa n/s1,205 46 50,005zne185 CS 85 807$ Avenida Bermudas4Calloe Sinaloa s/sCalle Nogales n/s2,565 61 156,465zne194 CS 94 705$ Avenida Bermudas5Calle Nogales n/sCalle Chillon n/s3,120 61 190,320zne581 CS 81 2,090$ Avenida Bermudas7Calle Chillon n/sCalle Tecate n/s3,195 41 130,995zne578 CS 78 2,341$ Avenida Bermudas9Calle Tampico n/sEND515 46 19,690zne183 CS 83 345$ Avenida Carranza1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,935 32 61,920zne579 CS 79 1,750$ Avenida Carranza2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,930 32 61,760zne581 CS 81 1,200$ Avenida Carranza3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne582 CS 82 1,275$ Avenida Cortez1Avenida Montezuma e/sCalle Colima s/s1,960 32 62,720zne579 CS 79 3,881$ Avenida Cortez2Calle Durango s/sCalle Sonora n/s575 32 18,400zne182 CS 82 759$ Avenida Cortez3Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s625 32 20,000zne179 CS 79 1,238$ Avenida Diaz1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,940 32 62,080zne575 CS 75 2,125$ Avenida Diaz3Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,940 32 62,080zne576 CS 76 2,085$ Avenida Diaz4Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne577 CS 77 1,510$ Avenida Diaz5Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,295 32 41,440zne182 CS 82 530$ Avenida Diaz6Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s575 32 18,400zne179 CS 79 1,060$ Avenida Diaz7Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne173 CS 73 1,500$ Avenida Diaz8Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s450 32 14,400zne179 CS 79 1,100$ Avenida Diaz9Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s690 32 22,080zne174 CS 74 2,900$ Avenida Herrera 1CDSCalle Madrid s/s1,855 32 61,376zne577 CS/SS 85 30,074$ Avenida Herrera 2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,930 32 61,760zne577 CS/SS 85 30,262$ Avenida Herrera 3Calle Colima s/sCalle Nogales s/s2,000 32 64,000zne579 CS/SS 87 31,360$ Avenida Herrera 4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,295 32 41,440zne178 CS/SS 86 20,306$ Avenida Herrera 5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s555 32 17,760zne177 CS/SS 85 8,702$ 67202 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2022‐23NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenida Herrera 6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne175 CS/SS 83 9,722$ Avenida Herrera 7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s1,275 32 40,800zne174 CS/SS 82 19,992$ Avenida Herrera 8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS625 32 21,536zne164 DO/CS/SS 84 36,396$ Avenida Juarez1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,950 32 62,400zne575 CS 75 4,040$ Avenida Juarez3Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,930 32 61,760zne574 CS 74 3,563$ Avenida Juarez4Calle Colima n/sCalle Chihuahua s/s1,270 32 40,640zne577 CS 77 1,328$ Avenida Juarez5Calle Nogales s/sCalle Sonora s/s1,325 32 42,400zne186 CS 86 515$ Avenida Juarez6Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s565 32 18,080zne182 CS 82 195$ Avenida Juarez7Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne182 CS 82 1,325$ Avenida Juarez8Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s380 32 12,160zne179 CS 79 964$ Avenida Juarez9Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s740 32 23,680zne180 CS 80 1,650$ Avenida Madero1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,945 32 62,240zne579 CS 79 1,300$ Avenida Madero2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Arroba s/s1,290 32 41,280zne579 CS 79 1,035$ Avenida Madero3Calle Arroba n/sCalle Colima s/s625 32 20,000zne577 CS 77 845$ Avenida Madero4Calle Colima n/sCalle Monterey s/s635 32 20,320zne578 CS 78 755$ Avenida Madero6CDSCalle Sonora s/s880 32 31,639zne185 CS 85 275$ Avenida Madero7Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s565 32 18,080zne183 CS 83 185$ Avenida Madero8Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 33 20,460zne180 CS 80 1,100$ Avenida Madero9Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s300 33 9,900zne180 CS 80 822$ Avenida Madero10Avenida Montezuma e/sCalle Monterey n/s350 33 11,550zne582 CS 82 925$ Avenida Montezuma1S End/Avenida MaderoCalle Nogales s/s5,405 32 172,960zne182 CS 82 6,200$ Avenida Montezuma2Calle Nogales n/sAvenida Carranza w/s3,295 32 105,440zne187 CS 87 4,005$ Avenida Montezuma4Avenida Bermudas w/sEisenhower Dr e/s1,075 52 55,900zne180 CS 80 2,640$ Avenida Obregon1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,935 32 61,920zne581 CS 81 1,250$ Avenida Obregon2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,935 32 61,920zne581 CS 81 1,150$ Avenida Obregon3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne580 CS 80 1,925$ Avenida Obregon4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,285 32 41,120zne182 CS 82 399$ Avenida Obregon5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s565 32 18,080zne179 CS 79 185$ Avenida Obregon6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne173 CS 73 1,050$ Avenida Obregon7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s875 32 28,000zne174 CS 74 2,420$ Avenida Obregon8Avenida Montezuma n/sAvenida Montezuma res s/s90 32 2,880zne174 CS 74 750$ Avenida Obregon9Avenida Alvarado w/s CDS625 32 18,763zne178 CS 78 975$ 68203 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2022‐23NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenida Ramirez1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,935 32 61,920zne577 CS 77 2,100$ Avenida Ramirez2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,935 32 61,920zne582 CS 82 1,625$ Avenida Ramirez3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne582 CS 82 1,425$ Avenida Ramirez4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,280 32 40,960zne180 CS 80 1,070$ Avenida Ramirez5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s575 32 18,400zne180 CS 80 850$ Avenida Rubio 1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,950 32 62,400zne575 CS 75 3,040$ Avenida Rubio 2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,940 32 62,080zne576 CS 76 2,600$ Avenida Rubio 3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne579 CS 79 1,660$ Avenida Rubio 4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,280 32 40,960zne183 CS 83 295$ Avenida Rubio 5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s565 32 18,080zne183 CS 83 490$ Avenida Rubio 6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s615 32 19,680zne178 CS 78 1,475$ Avenida Rubio 7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s535 32 17,120zne180 CS 80 1,150$ Avenida Rubio 8Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s615 32 19,680zne181 CS 81 975$ Avenida Vallejo1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,930 32 61,760zne581 CS 81 1,350$ Avenida Vallejo2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,930 32 61,760zne574 CS 74 3,500$ Avenida Vallejo3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne578 CS 78 1,850$ Avenida Vallejo4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,280 32 40,960zne179 CS 79 1,150$ Avenida Villa 1Avenida Bermudas e/sCalle Colima s/s1,700 32 54,400zne556 DO/CS/SS 76 91,936$ Avenida Villa 2Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,990 32 63,680zne580 CS/SS 88 31,203$ Avenida Villa 3Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,285 32 41,120zne175 CS/SS 83 20,149$ Avenida Villa 4Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s570 32 18,240zne176 CS/SS 84 8,938$ Avenida Villa 5Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne183 CS/SS 91 9,722$ Avenida Villa 6Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Navarro w/s1,180 32 37,760zne183 CS/SS 91 18,502$ Avenida Villa 7Avenida Navarro w/sCalle Tampico s/s535 32 17,120zne168 DO/CS/SS 88 28,933$ Avenue 471Washington Street e/sAdams Street w/s2,515 43 108,145zne246 GR/OL100 381,752$ Monroe Street1Ave 62 n/sAve 61 n/s3,300 26 85,800zne377 CS/SS 85 42,042$ Monroe Street2Ave 61 n/sAve 60 n/s2,040 32 65,280zne371 CS/SS 79 31,987$ Monroe Street3Ave 60 n/s (southbound)Ave 58 n/s (southbound)5,380 14 75,320zne371 CS/SS 79 36,907$ 996,821$ 69204 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2023‐24NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenida Carranza4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,280 32 40,960zne177 CS/SS 85 20,070$ Avenida Carranza5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s570 32 18,240zne176 CS/SS 84 8,938$ Avenida Carranza6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s615 32 19,680zne177 CS/SS 85 9,643$ Avenida Carranza7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s1,200 32 38,400zne172 CS/SS 80 18,816$ Avenida Carranza8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS655 32 20,960zne174 CS/SS 82 10,270$ Avenida Montezuma3Avenida Carranza w/sEisenhower Dr w/s1,275 37 47,175zne156 DO/CS/SS 76 79,726$ Avenida Navarro1Calle Chillon n/sCalle Colima s/s1,280 32 40,960zne576 CS/SS 84 20,070$ Avenida Navarro2Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,990 32 63,680zne574 CS/SS 82 31,203$ Avenida Navarro3Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,280 32 40,960zne177 CS/SS 85 20,070$ Avenida Navarro4Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s575 32 18,400zne172 CS/SS 80 9,016$ Avenida Navarro5Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne182 CS/SS 90 9,722$ Avenida Navarro6Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s1,230 32 39,360zne184 CS/SS 92 19,286$ Avenida Navarro7Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Tampico s/s 615 32 19,680zne164 DO/CS/SS 84 33,259$ Avenida Ramirez6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s610 32 19,520zne178 CS/SS 86 9,565$ Avenida Ramirez7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s1,285 32 41,120zne176 CS/SS 84 20,149$ Avenida Ramirez8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS630 32 22,624zne169 DO/CS/SS 89 38,235$ Avenida Velasco1CDSCalle Madrid s/s1,550 32 51,541zne573 CS/SS 81 25,255$ Avenida Velasco2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,925 32 61,600zne576 CS/SS 84 30,184$ Avenida Velasco3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,990 32 63,680zne579 CS/SS 87 31,203$ Avenida Velasco4Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango n/s580 32 18,560zne174 CS/SS 82 9,094$ Avenida Velasco5Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s630 32 20,160zne173 CS/SS 81 9,878$ Avenida Velasco6Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s1,300 32 41,600zne172 CS/SS 80 20,384$ Avenida Velasco8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS630 32 23,549zne179 CS/SS 87 11,539$ Avenida Velasco03aCalle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,300 32 41,600zne178 CS/SS 86 20,384$ Fred Waring Drive4Adams Street w/sVenice Dr w/s2,585 91 198,565zne473 CS/SS 81 97,297$ Fred Waring Drive5Palm Royal w/sWashington Street e/s1,525 105 150,125zne462 DO/CS/SS 82 253,711$ Fred Waring Drive04aVenice Dr w/sPalm Royal w/s1,125 86 81,000zne465 DO/CS/SS 85 136,890$ 1,003,859$ 70205 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2024‐25NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalArosa Way1Villeta Dr s/sLa Palma Drive n/s280 36 10,080zne482 CS/SS 90 4,939$ Arosa Way2La Palma Drive s/sSanita Drive n/s290 36 10,440zne475 CS/SS 83 5,116$ Avenida Diaz1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,940 32 62,080zne575 CS/SS 83 30,419$ Avenida Diaz3Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,940 32 62,080zne576 CS/SS 84 30,419$ Avenida Diaz4Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne577 CS/SS 85 31,046$ Avenida Diaz5Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,295 32 41,440zne182 CS/SS 90 20,306$ Avenida Diaz6Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s575 32 18,400zne179 CS/SS 87 9,016$ Avenida Diaz7Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne173 CS/SS 81 9,722$ Avenida Diaz8Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s450 32 14,400zne179 CS/SS 87 7,056$ Avenida Diaz9Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s690 32 22,080zne174 CS/SS 82 10,819$ Avenida Juarez1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,950 32 62,400zne575 CS/SS 83 30,576$ Avenida Juarez3Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,930 32 61,760zne574 CS/SS 82 30,262$ Avenida Juarez4Calle Colima n/sCalle Chihuahua s/s1,270 32 40,640zne577 CS/SS 85 19,914$ Avenida Martinez1Avenida Bermudas e/sCalle Madrid s/s785 32 25,120zne574 CS/SS 82 12,309$ Avenida Martinez2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,940 32 62,080zne577 CS/SS 85 30,419$ Avenida Martinez3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,990 32 63,680zne578 CS/SS 86 31,203$ Avenida Martinez4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,285 32 41,120zne172 CS/SS 80 20,149$ Avenida Martinez5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s560 32 17,920zne177 CS/SS 85 8,781$ Avenida Mendoza 1CDSCalle Madrid s/s125 32 6,016zne572 CS/SS 80 2,948$ Avenida Mendoza 2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,940 32 62,080zne579 CS/SS 87 30,419$ Avenida Mendoza 3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s 1,990 32 63,680zne580 CS/SS 88 31,203$ Avenida Mendoza 4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,285 32 41,120zne173 CS/SS 81 20,149$ Avenida Mendoza 5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s570 32 18,240zne173 CS/SS 81 8,938$ Avenida Obregon5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s565 32 18,080zne179 CS/SS 87 8,859$ Avenida Obregon6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s620 32 19,840zne173 CS/SS 81 9,722$ Avenida Obregon7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s875 32 28,000zne174 CS/SS 82 13,720$ Avenida Obregon8Avenida Montezuma n/sAvenida Montezuma res s/s90 32 2,880zne174 CS/SS 82 1,411$ Avenida Obregon9Avenida Alvarado w/s CDS625 32 18,763zne178 CS/SS 86 9,194$ Bottlebrush Drive1CDSDate Palm Avenue w\s1,260 32 41,939zne269 DO/CS/SS 89 70,877$ Calle Cadiz1Desert Club Drive e/sCalle Fortuna s/s680 23 15,640zne183 CS/SS 91 7,664$ Calle Cadiz2Calle Fortuna s/sCalle Guatemala w/s225 32 7,200zne180 CS/SS 88 3,528$ Calle Cadiz3Desert Club w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s640 25 16,000zne170 CS/SS 78 7,840$ 71206 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2024‐25NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Fortuna1Desert Club Drive e/sCalle Cadiz n/s695 25 17,375zne180 CS/SS 88 8,514$ Calle Madrid1Avenida Cortez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s3,100 32 99,200zne572 CS/SS 80 48,608$ Calle Madrid2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s600 32 19,200zne573 CS/SS 81 9,408$ Calle Tamazula1Avenida NuestraLa Fonda s/s600 32 19,200zne173 CS/SS 81 9,408$ Calle Temecula1Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s220 32 7,040zne573 CS/SS 81 3,450$ Calle Temecula2Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Temecula3Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Temecula4Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s220 32 7,040zne574 CS/SS 82 3,450$ Calle Temecula5Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s 220 32 7,040zne574 CS/SS 82 3,450$ Calle Temecula6Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Temecula7Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne576 CS/SS 84 3,450$ Calle Temecula8Avenida Ramirez w/sAvenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne573 CS/SS 81 3,450$ Calle Temecula9Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s215 32 6,880zne576 CS/SS 84 3,371$ Calle Temecula10Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s215 32 6,880zne581 CS/SS 89 3,371$ Calle Temecula11Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Temecula12Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez e/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Yucatan1Avenida Alvarado w/sAvenida Juarez e/s845 32 27,040zne172 CS/SS 80 13,250$ Carmen Place1Villeta Drive n/sCDS265 32 12,525zne475 CS/SS 83 6,137$ Cloud View Way1Summer View Way e/sDesert Fall Way s/s1,130 32 36,160zne173 CS/SS 81 17,718$ Date Palm Drive1Sagebrush Avenue s/sSaguaro Drive n/s520 32 16,640zne271 CS/SS 79 8,154$ Desert Fall Way1Summer View Way w/sCloud View Way w\s665 32 21,280zne173 CS/SS 81 10,427$ Forbes Circle1Seeley e/sVia Coronado E/S830 36 29,880zne474 CS/SS 82 14,641$ Fred Waring Drive1Jefferson Street w/sDune Palms Road w/s2,650 70 185,500zne476 CS/SS 84 90,895$ Sagebrush Avenue1160' w/o Date Palm Drive Washington Street e/s1,350 32 43,200zne271 CS/SS 79 21,168$ Saguaro Drive1CDSDATE PALM W/S1,260 32 41,940zne271 CS/SS 79 20,551$ Sanita Drive1Arosa Way s/sCDS1,720 36 65,039zne475 CS/SS 83 31,869$ Sonesta Way1Villeta Drive n/sVilleta Drive n/s1,120 36 40,320zne472 CS/SS 80 19,757$ Summer View Way1Springtime Way n/sDesert Fall Way n/s480 32 15,360zne165 DO/CS/SS 85 25,958$ Villeta Drive1Sanita Drive n/sSonesta Drive s/s3,600 36 129,600zne475 CS/SS 83 63,504$ Winter Cove Court1Summer View Way e/sCDS420 32 13,440zne179 CS/SS 87 6,586$ 1,036,733$ 72207 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2025‐26NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAdams Street4Highway 111 n/sMiles Avenue s/s4,845 60 261,600zne471 CS/SS 79 135,300$ Adams Street6Miles Ave n/sFred Waring Drive s/s2,575 60 146,775zne476 CS/SS 84 73,920$ Adams Street8Fred Warring Dr n/sDarby Rd s/s1,975 32 57,720zne476 CS/SS 84 29,583$ Avenida Rubio 1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,950 32 62,400zne575 CS/SS 83 33,476$ Avenida Rubio 2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,940 32 62,080zne576 CS/SS 84 32,419$ Avenida Rubio 3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne579 CS/SS 87 31,046$ Avenida Vallejo1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s1,930 32 61,760zne581 CS/SS 89 30,262$ Avenida Vallejo2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s1,930 32 61,760zne574 CS/SS 82 35,262$ Avenida Vallejo3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s1,980 32 63,360zne578 CS/SS 86 31,046$ Avenida Vallejo4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s1,280 32 40,960zne179 CS/SS 87 20,070$ Avenida Vallejo5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s570 32 18,240zne175 CS/SS 83 8,938$ Avenida Vallejo6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s625 33 20,625zne172 CS/SS 80 10,106$ Avenida Vallejo7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s1,295 33 42,735zne175 CS/SS 83 20,940$ Calle Chillon1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s180 32 5,760zne581 CS/SS 89 2,822$ Calle Chillon2Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon3Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s220 32 7,040zne581 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Chillon4Avenida Jaurez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon5Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon6Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon7Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon8Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carrenza w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon9Avenida Carrenza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s220 32 7,040zne578 CS/SS 86 3,450$ Calle Chillon10Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon11Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Chillon12Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon13Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon14Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon15Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s220 32 7,040zne579 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon16Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon17Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s320 32 10,240zne580 CS/SS 88 5,018$ Calle Durango1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s3,460 32 110,720zne174 CS/SS 82 56,432$ Calle Durango2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s1,250 32 40,000zne178 CS/SS 86 19,600$ 73208 City of La Quinta$1 Million AnnualRecommended Budget$1 Million Budget 2025‐26NameSec FromToLength Width Area ZonePCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Potrero6Avenida Obregon e/sAvendia Carranza w/s220 32 7,040zne577 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Potrero7Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s 220 32 7,040zne575 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero8Avenida Ramirez e/sAvendia Vallejo w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero9Avenida Vallejo e/sAvendia Herrera w/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero10Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco e/s220 32 7,040zne575 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero11Avenida Velasco e/sAvenida Bernudas w/s200 32 6,400zne580 CS/SS 88 3,136$ Calle Sinaloa1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s3,310 32 105,920zne166 DO/CS/SS 86 185,152$ Dandelion Drive1Monticello Dr e/sLiberty Ave w/s790 32 25,280zne475 CS/SS 83 12,387$ Dandelion Drive2Monticello Ave w/sVerbena Dr e/s910 32 29,120zne482 CS/SS 90 14,269$ Dandelion Drive3Verbena Dr w/sCDS525 32 20,279zne482 CS/SS 90 9,937$ Liberty Avenue1Morris Ave s/sDandelion Dr s/s935 32 29,920zne481 CS/SS 89 14,661$ Monticello Avenue1Miles Ave n/sFred Waring s/s2,710 32 86,720zne478 CS/SS 86 42,493$ 927,268$ 74209 SH-111 60TH AVE MONROE ST54TH AVE 50TH AVE 62ND AVE MILES AVE 52ND AVE 48TH AVE FRED WARING DR EISENHOWER DR49TH AVE WASHINGTON STLIGAAVENUE 52 MADISON STCITRUS DUNE PALMS RDAIRPORT BLVD PGA BLVD58TH AVEAVENIDA VALLEJOAVENIDA RUBIOAVENIDA RAMIREZAVENIDA HERRERARI VIE RAJEFFERSON STAVENIDA CARRANZAOAK HILLAVENIDA VILLAADAMS ST61ST AVE AVENUE 58AVENIDA ALVARADOAVENIDA MARTINEZSHIELDS RDWINGED FOOTHERMITAGEAVENIDA NAVARROHJORTH STMERION 51ST AVECALLE TAMPICO MANDARINA WEISKOPF 55TH AVECLINTON STVIA DONAROSS AVEDEL GATO DREL DORADO DRVIA SAVONAWARNER TRLINVERNESSPINA VIA PAESSARO 47TH AVE 46TH AVE OASIS STAVENIDA MADEROPARK AVEELKHORN TRLLIMA VILLAGE DRA V E N ID A M O N T E Z U M A CETRINO SOUTHERN HILLSBONITA TRLA N D A LU SI ACALEO BAYC O A C H ELLA D RAVENIDA F ERN ANDO MISSION DR EQUAI L RUN LNARACENA S P A N I S H B A Y IROQUOIS DR TOM FAZIO LN N RI VIE RA AVETIBURON DR AVENIDA LA FONDASEELEY DRYOUNGS LNVIA CC TROON WAYVIA VALEROSAAVILA DRMI SSI ON DR WTOPAZ DRR O N D AFIRESTONEEMERALD DR U LRIC H DRMOUNTAIN VIEWV ILLA G E C LU B D R VI A DDBURR STSTILLWATER DRVIA SEVILLA CSILLA ST BAFFIN AVEVISTA ESTRELLAPOMELO ST VIA PISAP R IS M D RAVENIDA BERMUDASDESERT CLUB DRCALLE MAZATLAN VI A C ARM E L TORINO DR MUIRFIELD VILLAGE VILLETA DR TORONJA BAYAJASPER PARK AVE TEE ST CEREZATANGLEWOODSANITA DR PARK LNBALBOA PLPALM DRMONTICELLO AVEG A L A X Y D R TIGRIS AVE BELLERIVE POLO RD MARY LN FIESTA DR N U E V O D R SAND DR59TH AVE JASMINE LN V I A MEL OD I A SUNBROOK LN53RD AVEDAKOTA TRLOCOTILLO DRCABRILLO PLALMONTEBIG CANYON STVIA PALACIOJEREZINTERLACHENNATIONAL D R M ANITO U DRYALE STBROWN DEER PARK DULCE DEL MAR AR A P A H O E ROUDEL LNROCK ROSE DRMAGELLAN PLAVERY DR JACK NICKLAUSMARBELLA CTALYSHEBA DRBRADSHAW TRLVIA SORRENTOVIA STRADACALLE NORTE PEAR STGREEN HILLS DR ROYAL BIR KDALE DR VIA ROSAVISTA LAGUNACLARET CVWASHINGTON ST FRONTAGELA QUINTA DRSAGEBRUSH AVE PEERLESS PLPECOS PL CONTENTOSILVER ROCKDIANE DR VIA PORTOFINO TANGELO DRVIA RITA SAGUARO RD ZENDA DR VIA BRAVA R O YA L DO RNO C H DR CEDAR CRESTARDENNAIS DRSTONEGATEBAY CLUB DRAVENIDA OBREGONPINDO DRSANDPIPER DR PEBBLE BEACHQU A R R Y LN SHADOW TRL S VALLEY LNALI CTT U L A R E L N RIO SECOVIA SOLANALAUREL VALLEYAVENIDA ULTIMO NAUTICAL DRST FRANCIS AVESTONEMONT DRV I A D I J ON VIA PALMILLASIERRA VISTA SIENA CT VIDA BELLA DR AMALFI DR VISTA PALOM INOVILLANOVA STV IST A G R A N D E ORCHID CTVIA ENCINITAS CA L LE BR I S A TRIBECCA ST HIGGINS CT VICTORIA LNARCHINE LNC A R B O N E R A SAVENIDA DIAZAVENIDA JUAREZWASHINGTON STMADISON STADAMS STJEFFERSON STMADISON ST51ST AVE ADAMS STMADISON ST55TH AVE 58TH AVEADAMS STAIRPORT BLVD ® Legend La Quinta $1 Million Recommended Streets 2021-22 Crack Sealing 2021-22 2022-23 Crack Sealing 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 City of La Quinta $1 Million Budget Map 2021-26 75210 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAdams Street1Avenue 48 n/sHighway 111 s/s4 2,895 81 180,17078 CS/SS 86 88,283$ Adams Street4Highway 111 n/sMiles Avenue s/s5 4,845 60 261,60071 CS/SS 79 128,184$ Adams Street6Miles Ave n/sFred Waring Drive s/s5 2,575 60 146,77576 CS/SS 84 71,920$ Adams Street8Fred Warring Dr n/sDarby Rd s/s2 1,975 32 57,72076 CS/SS 84 28,283$ Airport Boulevard1Monroe Street w/sMadison Avenue e/s2 5,100 82 300,00083 CS/SS 91 147,000$ Alba Court1Torino Dr n/sCDS2 235 32 10,99982 CS/SS 90 5,390$ Alden Circle1Seeley DriveEnd2 580 36 20,88083 CS/SS 91 10,231$ Ambassador Circle1Monticello Ave w/s CDS2 250 32 11,47981 CS/SS 89 5,625$ America Court1Hemings Way s/sCDS2 295 32 12,91981 CS/SS 89 6,330$ Arbola Circle1Fronterra DriveCDS2 320 32 13,71984 CS/SS 92 6,722$ Arosa Way1Villeta Dr s/sLa Palma Drive n/s2 280 36 10,08082 CS/SS 90 4,939$ Arosa Way2La Palma Drive s/sSanita Drive n/s2 290 36 10,44075 CS/SS 83 5,116$ Ashley Place1Carrie Ln e/sAshley Way e/s2 800 36 28,80076 CS/SS 84 14,112$ Ashley Way1Ashley Pl n/sDesert Stream Dr s/s2 215 36 7,74079 CS/SS 87 3,793$ Ashwood Court1Bayberry Ave s/sCDS2 150 34 8,55984 CS/SS 92 4,194$ Auto Center Drive1Adams St e/sLa Quinta Dr w/s2 1,005 50 50,25090 None 90‐$ Auto Center Way1Hwy 111 s/sCircle2 415 37 15,35588 None 88‐$ Avenida Alvarado1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,935 32 61,92081 CS/SS 89 30,341$ Avenida Alvarado2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,935 32 61,92082 CS/SS 90 30,341$ /,$Avenida Alvarado3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,985 32 63,52084 CS/SS 92 31,125$ Avenida Alvarado4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,280 32 40,96081 CS/SS 89 20,070$ Avenida Alvarado5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 570 32 18,24080 CS/SS 88 8,938$ Avenida Alvarado6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 32 19,84083 CS/SS 91 9,722$ Avenida Alvarado7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 650 32 20,80076 CS/SS 84 10,192$ Avenida Alvarado8Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2 400 32 12,80081 CS/SS 89 6,272$ Avenida Bermudas1Calle Tampico s/sCalle Sinaloa n/s3 1,205 46 50,00585 None 85‐$ Avenida Bermudas4Calloe Sinaloa s/sCalle Nogales n/s4 2,565 61 156,46594 None 94‐$ Avenida Bermudas5Calle Nogales n/sCalle Chillon n/s4 3,120 61 190,32081 CS/SS 89 93,257$ Avenida Bermudas7Calle Chillon n/sCalle Tecate n/s2 3,195 41 130,99578 CS/SS 86 64,188$ Avenida Bermudas9Calle Tampico n/sEND2 515 46 19,69083 CS/SS 91 9,648$ Avenida Carranza1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,935 32 61,92079 CS/SS 87 30,341$ Avenida Carranza2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,930 32 61,76081 CS/SS 89 30,262$ Avenida Carranza3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,980 32 63,36082 CS/SS 90 31,046$ Avenida Carranza4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,280 32 40,96077 CS/SS 85 20,070$ Avenida Carranza5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 570 32 18,24076 CS/SS 84 8,938$ Avenida Carranza6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 615 32 19,68077 CS/SS 85 9,643$ 76211 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenida Carranza7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 1,200 32 38,40072 CS/SS 80 18,816$ Avenida Carranza8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2 655 32 20,96074 CS/SS 82 10,270$ Avenida Cortez1Avenida Montezuma e/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,960 32 62,72079 CS/SS 87 30,733$ Avenida Cortez2Calle Durango s/sCalle Sonora n/s2 575 32 18,40082 CS/SS 90 9,016$ Avenida Cortez3Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 625 32 20,00079 CS/SS 87 9,800$ Avenida Diaz1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,940 32 62,08075 CS/SS 83 30,419$ Avenida Diaz3Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,940 32 62,08076 CS/SS 84 30,419$ Avenida Diaz4Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,980 32 63,36077 CS/SS 85 31,046$ Avenida Diaz5Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,295 32 41,44082 CS/SS 90 20,306$ Avenida Diaz6Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 575 32 18,40079 CS/SS 87 9,016$ Avenida Diaz7Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 32 19,84073 CS/SS 81 9,722$ Avenida Diaz8Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 450 32 14,40079 CS/SS 87 7,056$ Avenida Diaz9Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2 690 32 22,08074 CS/SS 82 10,819$ Avenida Herrera 1CDSCalle Madrid s/s2 1,855 32 61,37677 CS/SS 85 30,074$ Avenida Herrera 2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,930 32 61,76077 CS/SS 85 30,262$ Avenida Herrera 3Calle Colima s/sCalle Nogales s/s2 2,000 32 64,00079 CS/SS 87 31,360$ Avenida Herrera 4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,295 32 41,44078 CS/SS 86 20,306$ Avenida Herrera 5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 555 32 17,76077 CS/SS 85 8,702$ Avenida Herrera 6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 32 19,84075 CS/SS 83 9,722$ g/,$Avenida Herrera 7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 1,275 32 40,80074 CS/SS 82 19,992$ Avenida Herrera 8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2 625 32 21,53664 DO/CS/SS 84 36,396$ Avenida Juarez1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,950 32 62,40075 CS/SS 83 30,576$ Avenida Juarez3Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,930 32 61,76074 CS/SS 82 30,262$ Avenida Juarez4Calle Colima n/sCalle Chihuahua s/s2 1,270 32 40,64077 CS/SS 85 19,914$ Avenida Juarez5Calle Nogales s/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,325 32 42,40086 None 86‐$ Avenida Juarez6Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 565 32 18,08082 CS/SS 90 8,859$ Avenida Juarez7Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 32 19,84082 CS/SS 90 9,722$ Avenida Juarez8Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 380 32 12,16079 CS/SS 87 5,958$ Avenida Juarez9Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2 740 32 23,68080 CS/SS 88 11,603$ Avenida La Fonda1Desert Club Dr e/sWashington w/s2 1,990 32 63,68074 CS/SS 82 31,203$ Avenida La Fonda2Desert Club Drive w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s1 630 64 40,32079 CS/SS 87 19,757$ Avenida La Fonda3Calle Tamazula e/sCalle Rondo w/s1 1,255 50 62,75076 CS/SS 84 30,748$ Avenida La Jarita1Calle Quinto e/sCalle Rondo w/s2 525 32 16,80082 CS/SS 90 8,232$ Avenida La Torres1Calle Rondo w/sCalle Quinto e/s2 665 32 21,28084 CS/SS 92 10,427$ Avenida Madero1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,945 32 62,24079 CS/SS 87 30,498$ Avenida Madero2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Arroba s/s2 1,290 32 41,28079 CS/SS 87 20,227$ 77212 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenida Madero3Calle Arroba n/sCalle Colima s/s2 625 32 20,00077 CS/SS 85 9,800$ Avenida Madero4Calle Colima n/sCalle Monterey s/s2 635 32 20,32078 CS/SS 86 9,957$ Avenida Madero6CDSCalle Sonora s/s2 880 32 31,63985 None 85‐$ Avenida Madero7Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 565 32 18,08083 CS/SS 91 8,859$ Avenida Madero8Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 33 20,46080 CS/SS 88 10,025$ Avenida Madero9Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 300 33 9,90080 CS/SS 88 4,851$ Avenida Madero10Avenida Montezuma e/sCalle Monterey n/s2 350 33 11,55082 CS/SS 90 5,660$ Avenida Martinez1Avenida Bermudas e/sCalle Madrid s/s2 785 32 25,12074 CS/SS 82 12,309$ Avenida Martinez2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,940 32 62,08077 CS/SS 85 30,419$ Avenida Martinez3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,990 32 63,68078 CS/SS 86 31,203$ Avenida Martinez4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,285 32 41,12072 CS/SS 80 20,149$ Avenida Martinez5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 560 32 17,92077 CS/SS 85 8,781$ Avenida Martinez6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 625 32 20,00084 CS/SS 92 9,800$ Avenida Martinez7Calle Sinaloa n/sEisenhower Dr e/s2 1,185 32 37,92084 CS/SS 92 18,581$ Avenida Martinez8Eisenhower Dr e/sCalle Tampico s/s2 500 36 18,00082 CS/SS 90 8,820$ Avenida Mendoza 1CDSCalle Madrid s/s2 125 32 6,01672 CS/SS 80 2,948$ Avenida Mendoza 2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,940 32 62,08079 CS/SS 87 30,419$ Avenida Mendoza 3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s 2 1,990 32 63,68080 CS/SS 88 31,203$ Avenida Mendoza 4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,285 32 41,12073 CS/SS 81 20,149$ g/,$Avenida Mendoza 5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 570 32 18,24073 CS/SS 81 8,938$ Avenida Mendoza 6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 32 19,84082 CS/SS 90 9,722$ Avenida Mendoza 7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 1,025 32 32,80084 CS/SS 92 16,072$ Avenida Mendoza 8Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Tampico s/s2 375 32 12,00068 DO/CS/SS 88 20,280$ Avenida Montezuma1S End/Avenida MaderoCalle Nogales s/s2 5,405 32 172,96082 CS/SS 90 84,750$ Avenida Montezuma2Calle Nogales n/sAvenida Carranza w/s2 3,295 32 105,44087 None 87‐$ Avenida Montezuma3Avenida Carranza w/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 1,275 37 47,17556 DO/CS/SS 76 79,726$ Avenida Montezuma4Avenida Bermudas w/sEisenhower Dr e/s1 1,075 52 55,90080 CS/SS 88 27,391$ Avenida Montezuma (Res.)1Avenida Juarez w/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2 950 32 30,400100 None 100‐$ Avenida Morales1Avenida Montezuma s/sCalle Durango n/s2 600 32 19,20077 CS/SS 85 9,408$ Avenida Naranja1Calle Rondo w/sCalle Quinto e/s2 510 32 16,32079 CS/SS 87 7,997$ Avenida Navarro1Calle Chillon n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,280 32 40,96076 CS/SS 84 20,070$ Avenida Navarro2Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,990 32 63,68074 CS/SS 82 31,203$ Avenida Navarro3Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,280 32 40,96077 CS/SS 85 20,070$ Avenida Navarro4Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 575 32 18,40072 CS/SS 80 9,016$ Avenida Navarro5Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 32 19,84082 CS/SS 90 9,722$ Avenida Navarro6Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 1,230 32 39,36084 CS/SS 92 19,286$ 78213 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenida Navarro7Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Tampico s/s 2 615 32 19,68064 DO/CS/SS 84 33,259$ Avenida Nuestra1Calle RondoCalle Tamazula2 1,260 32 40,32086 None 86‐$ Avenida Nuestra2Calle Kalima e/sCalle Guatemala w/s2 1,080 29 31,32081 CS/SS 89 15,347$ Avenida Obregon1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,935 32 61,92081 CS/SS 89 30,341$ Avenida Obregon2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,935 32 61,92081 CS/SS 89 30,341$ Avenida Obregon3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,980 32 63,36080 CS/SS 88 31,046$ Avenida Obregon4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,285 32 41,12082 CS/SS 90 20,149$ Avenida Obregon5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 565 32 18,08079 CS/SS 87 8,859$ Avenida Obregon6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 32 19,84073 CS/SS 81 9,722$ Avenida Obregon7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 875 32 28,00074 CS/SS 82 13,720$ Avenida Obregon8Avenida Montezuma n/sAvenida Montezuma res s/s2 90 32 2,88074 CS/SS 82 1,411$ Avenida Obregon9Avenida Alvarado w/s CDS2 625 32 18,76378 CS/SS 86 9,194$ Avenida Ramirez1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,935 32 61,92077 CS/SS 85 30,341$ Avenida Ramirez2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,935 32 61,92082 CS/SS 90 30,341$ Avenida Ramirez3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,980 32 63,36082 CS/SS 90 31,046$ Avenida Ramirez4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,280 32 40,96080 CS/SS 88 20,070$ Avenida Ramirez5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 575 32 18,40080 CS/SS 88 9,016$ Avenida Ramirez6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 610 32 19,52078 CS/SS 86 9,565$ Avenida Ramirez7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 1,285 32 41,12076 CS/SS 84 20,149$ /,$Avenida Ramirez8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2 630 32 22,62469 DO/CS/SS 89 38,235$ Avenida Rubio 1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,950 32 62,40075 CS/SS 83 30,576$ Avenida Rubio 2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,940 32 62,08076 CS/SS 84 30,419$ Avenida Rubio 3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,980 32 63,36079 CS/SS 87 31,046$ Avenida Rubio 4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,280 32 40,96083 CS/SS 91 20,070$ Avenida Rubio 5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 565 32 18,08083 CS/SS 91 8,859$ Avenida Rubio 6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 615 32 19,68078 CS/SS 86 9,643$ Avenida Rubio 7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 535 32 17,12080 CS/SS 88 8,389$ Avenida Rubio 8Avenida Montezuma n/sCalle Yucatan s/s2 615 32 19,68081 CS/SS 89 9,643$ Avenida Tujunga1EndCalle Quinto w/s2 550 32 17,60083 CS/SS 91 8,624$ Avenida Tujunga2Calle Quinto e/sCalle Rondo w/s2 620 32 19,84077 CS/SS 85 9,722$ Avenida Ultimo1W. EndCalle Rondo w/s2 1,170 32 37,44082 CS/SS 90 18,346$ Avenida Vallejo1Calle Tecate n/sCalle Madrid s/s2 1,930 32 61,76081 CS/SS 89 30,262$ Avenida Vallejo2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,930 32 61,76074 CS/SS 82 30,262$ Avenida Vallejo3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,980 32 63,36078 CS/SS 86 31,046$ Avenida Vallejo4Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,280 32 40,96079 CS/SS 87 20,070$ Avenida Vallejo5Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 570 32 18,24075 CS/SS 83 8,938$ 79214 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenida Vallejo6Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 625 33 20,62572 CS/SS 80 10,106$ Avenida Vallejo7Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 1,295 33 42,73575 CS/SS 83 20,940$ Avenida Vallejo8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2 635 33 24,34067 DO/CS/SS 87 41,135$ Avenida Velasco1CDSCalle Madrid s/s2 1,550 32 51,54173 CS/SS 81 25,255$ Avenida Velasco2Calle Madrid n/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,925 32 61,60076 CS/SS 84 30,184$ Avenida Velasco3Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,990 32 63,68079 CS/SS 87 31,203$ Avenida Velasco4Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango n/s2 580 32 18,56074 CS/SS 82 9,094$ Avenida Velasco5Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 630 32 20,16073 CS/SS 81 9,878$ Avenida Velasco6Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Montezuma s/s2 1,300 32 41,60072 CS/SS 80 20,384$ Avenida Velasco8Avenida Montezuma n/sCDS2 630 32 23,54979 CS/SS 87 11,539$ Avenida Velasco03aCalle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,300 32 41,60078 CS/SS 86 20,384$ Avenida Villa 1Avenida Bermudas e/sCalle Colima s/s2 1,700 32 54,40056 DO/CS/SS 76 91,936$ Avenida Villa 2Calle Colima n/sCalle Nogales s/s2 1,990 32 63,68080 CS/SS 88 31,203$ Avenida Villa 3Calle Nogales n/sCalle Sonora s/s2 1,285 32 41,12075 CS/SS 83 20,149$ Avenida Villa 4Calle Sonora n/sCalle Durango s/s2 570 32 18,24076 CS/SS 84 8,938$ Avenida Villa 5Calle Durango n/sCalle Sinaloa s/s2 620 32 19,84083 CS/SS 91 9,722$ Avenida Villa 6Calle Sinaloa n/sAvenida Navarro w/s2 1,180 32 37,76083 CS/SS 91 18,502$ Avenida Villa 7Avenida Navarro w/sCalle Tampico s/s2 535 32 17,12068 DO/CS/SS 88 28,933$ Avenue 471Washington Street e/sAdams Street w/s2 2,515 43 108,14546 GR/OL 100 381,752$ g/,$Avenue 481Washington Street e/sDune Palms Rd w/s4 5,230 80 340,78087 None 87‐$ Avenue 482Dune Palms Rd w/sJefferson Ave w/s4 2,620 80 161,28086 None 86‐$ Avenue 501Eisenhower Drive e/s Washington St w/s 4 3,965 66 232,99044 GR/OL 100 822,455$ Avenue 502Washington Street e/s Park Avenue w/s 4 3,140 72 181,08087 None 87‐$ Avenue 503Park Avenue e/sJefferson Street w/s4 4,730 72 287,86091 None 91‐$ Avenue 505Jefferson Street e/s sharMadison Street w/s shared2 5,190 30 155,70061 DO/CS/SS 81 263,133$ Avenue 521Avenida Bermudas e/sWashington St w/s4 2,735 82 178,28059 DO/CS/SS 79 301,293$ Avenue 522Washington Street w/sSilverrock Way e/s4 3,520 82 216,64080 CS/SS 88 106,154$ Avenue 523Silverrock Way e/sJefferson St w/s3 4,860 72 284,12097 None 97‐$ Avenue 524Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street e/s3 5,215 65 258,97577 CS/SS 85 126,898$ Avenue 525Madison Street e/s (eastbound) Monroe St w/s (eastbound) 2 5,275 32124,80069 DO/CS/SS 89 210,912$ Avenue 532EndMonroe St w/s2 815 50 40,75081 CS/SS 89 19,968$ Avenue 541Monroe Street w/sMadison Street e/s2 5,400 25 197,00096 None 96‐$ Avenue 542Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street e/s3 5,070 56 226,320100 None 100‐$ Avenue 543W/S Jefferson AveEnd2 2,500 50 125,00076 CS/SS 84 61,250$ Avenue 581Jefferson Street e/sMadison Street w/s3 5,250 64 316,00094 None 94‐$ Avenue 582Madison Street e/s Monroe St w/s5 5,270 68 343,36099 None 99‐$ 80215 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalAvenue 601Madison St w/sMonroe St w/s3 5,300 57 252,10081 CS/SS 89 123,529$ Avenue 602Monroe St e/s City Limits2 1,335 25 33,37573 CS/SS 81 16,354$ Avenue 621Monroe St w/sEnd2 3,680 26 95,68082 CS/SS 90 46,883$ Bayberry Lane1Coldbrook Ln e/sDeerbrook Ln w/s2 850 36 30,60079 CS/SS 87 14,994$ Bayberry Lane2Deerbrook Ln e/s Sunbrook Ln w/s2 220 36 7,92073 CS/SS 81 3,881$ Bayberry Lane3Sunbrook Ln e/sAdams St w/s2 130 36 4,68076 CS/SS 84 2,293$ Birchcrest Circle1Bayberry Ln n/sBayberry Ln n/s2 1,400 32 44,80083 CS/SS 91 21,952$ BLACKHAWK WAY1Dune Palms Road w/sAdams Street e/s3 2,600 44 114,40079 CS/SS 87 56,056$ Blazing Star Trail1Star Flower Trail n/sDune Palm Road e/s2 1,880 36 67,68082 CS/SS 90 33,163$ Bottlebrush Drive1CDSDate Palm Avenue w\s2 1,260 32 41,93969 DO/CS/SS 89 70,877$ Bradford Circle1Seeley DriveEnd2 640 36 23,04077 CS/SS 85 11,290$ Bridgette Way1Desert Stream n/sMiles Avenue s/s2 1,500 36 54,00085 None 85‐$ Buttercup Lane1EndBlazing Star Trail n/s2 450 32 14,40079 CS/SS 87 7,056$ Buttercup Lane2Blazing Star Trail s/sMarigold Lane n/s2 420 32 13,44081 CS/SS 89 6,586$ Cahuilla Park Road1Jefferson Ave w/sEnd2 2,185 30 65,55076 CS/SS 84 32,120$ Caleo Bay147th Ave48th Ave2 2,800 40 112,00086 None 86‐$ Calico Circle1Blazing Star Trail n/sCDS2 490 32 19,15982 CS/SS 90 9,388$ Calle Amigo1Avenida Bermudas e/sDesert Club Drive w/s2 645 24 15,48078 CS/SS 86 7,585$ Calle Arroba1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s2 255 32 8,16077 CS/SS 85 3,998$ /,$Calle Arroba2Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s2 220 32 7,04083 CS/SS 91 3,450$ Calle Arroba3Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2 220 32 7,04082 CS/SS 90 3,450$ Calle Arroba4Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2 220 32 7,04082 CS/SS 90 3,450$ Calle Arroba5Avenida Diaz e/s Avenida Rubio w/s2 220 32 7,04082 CS/SS 90 3,450$ Calle Arroba6Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2 220 32 7,04082 CS/SS 90 3,450$ Calle Arroba7Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2 220 32 7,04082 CS/SS 90 3,450$ Calle Arroba8Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2 220 32 7,04082 CS/SS 90 3,450$ Calle Arroba9Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2 220 32 7,04082 CS/SS 90 3,450$ Calle Arroba10Avenida Ramirez e/s Avenida Vallejo w/s2 220 32 7,04080 CS/SS 88 3,450$ Calle Arroba11Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s 2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Arroba12Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Arroba13Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 225 32 7,20083 CS/SS 91 3,528$ Calle Arroba14Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2 220 32 7,04084 CS/SS 92 3,450$ Calle Arroba15Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2 220 32 7,04083 CS/SS 91 3,450$ Calle Arroba16Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Arroba17Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Arroba18Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 225 32 7,20081 CS/SS 89 3,528$ 81216 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Barcelona1Desert Club Drive w/s Avenida Bermudas e/s2 645 24 15,48069 DO/CS/SS 89 26,161$ Calle Cadiz1Desert Club Drive e/sCalle Fortuna s/s2 680 23 15,64083 CS/SS 91 7,664$ Calle Cadiz2Calle Fortuna s/sCalle Guatemala w/s2 225 32 7,20080 CS/SS 88 3,528$ Calle Cadiz3Desert Club w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s2 640 25 16,00070 CS/SS 78 7,840$ Calle Chihuahua1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2 310 32 9,92079 CS/SS 87 4,861$ Calle Chihuahua2Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua3Avenida Rubio e/s Avenida Alvarado w/s2 220 32 7,04078 CS/SS 86 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua4Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua5Avenida Obregon e/s Avenida Carranza w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua6Avenida Carranza e/s Avenida Ramirez w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua7Avenida Ramirez e/s Avenida Vallejo w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua8Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua9Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua10Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua11Eisenhower Dr e/s Avenida Martinez w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua12Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua13Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua14Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro e/s2 220 32 7,04078 CS/SS 86 3,450$ Calle Chihuahua15Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 220 32 7,04078 CS/SS 86 3,450$ /,$Calle Chillon1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Cortez w/s2 180 32 5,76081 CS/SS 89 2,822$ Calle Chillon2Avenida Cortez e/sAvenida Madero w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon3Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Chillon4Avenida Jaurez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon5Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon6Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon7Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon8Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carrenza w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon9Avenida Carrenza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2 220 32 7,04078 CS/SS 86 3,450$ Calle Chillon10Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon11Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Chillon12Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon13Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon14Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon15Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Chillon16Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Chillon17Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 320 32 10,24080 CS/SS 88 5,018$ 82217 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Colima1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 3,260 32 104,32077 CS/SS 85 51,117$ Calle Colima2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 1,250 32 40,00077 CS/SS 85 19,600$ Calle Durango1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 3,460 32 110,72074 CS/SS 82 54,253$ Calle Durango2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 1,250 32 40,00078 CS/SS 86 19,600$ Calle Ensenada1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s2 200 32 6,40086 None 86‐$ Calle Ensenada2Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2 220 32 7,04087 None 87‐$ Calle Ensenada3Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2 220 32 7,04085 None 85‐$ Calle Ensenada4Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2 220 32 7,04087 None 87‐$ Calle Ensenada5Avenida Rubio e/s Avenida Alvarado w/s2 220 32 7,04086 None 86‐$ Calle Ensenada6Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2 220 32 7,04085 None 85‐$ Calle Ensenada7Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Ensenada8Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2 220 32 7,04078 CS/SS 86 3,450$ Calle Ensenada9Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2 220 32 7,04080 CS/SS 88 3,450$ Calle Ensenada10Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Ensenada11Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Ensenada12Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 220 32 7,04080 CS/SS 88 3,450$ Calle Ensenada13Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Ensenada14Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Ensenada15Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2 220 32 7,04080 CS/SS 88 3,450$ /,$Calle Ensenada16Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Ensenada17Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Estado eb1Desert Club Drive w/sAvenidas Bermudas e/s1 615 30 18,45081 CS/SS 89 9,041$ Calle Estado wb1Desert Club Drive w/sAvenida Bermudas e/s2 615 30 18,45079 CS/SS 87 9,041$ Calle Fortuna1Desert Club Drive e/sCalle Cadiz n/s2 695 25 17,37580 CS/SS 88 8,514$ Calle Guatemala1Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2 620 32 19,84078 CS/SS 86 9,722$ Calle Guaymas1Avenida Tujunga s/sAvenida Naranja n/s2 625 32 20,00074 CS/SS 82 9,800$ Calle Hidalgo1Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2 225 32 7,20077 CS/SS 85 3,528$ Calle Hidalgo2Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Hidalgo3Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2 220 32 7,04076 CS/SS 84 3,450$ Calle Hidalgo4Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Hidalgo5Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Hidalgo6Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 220 32 7,04083 CS/SS 91 3,450$ Calle Hidalgo7Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2 220 32 7,04083 CS/SS 91 3,450$ Calle Hidalgo8Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2 220 32 7,04084 CS/SS 92 3,450$ Calle Hidalgo9Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2 220 32 7,04084 CS/SS 92 3,450$ Calle Hidalgo10Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2 220 32 7,04084 CS/SS 92 3,450$ 83218 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Hidalgo11Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 220 32 7,04085 None 85‐$ Calle Hueneme1Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2 620 32 19,84077 CS/SS 85 9,722$ Calle Iloilo1Avenida Nuestra n/sAvenida La Fonda s/s2 620 32 19,84080 CS/SS 88 9,722$ Calle Jacumba 1Avenida La Fonda s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s2 620 32 19,84078 CS/SS 86 9,722$ Calle Kalima1Avenida Nuestra n/sCDS2 610 32 22,99980 CS/SS 88 11,270$ Calle Madrid1Avenida Cortez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 3,100 32 99,20072 CS/SS 80 48,608$ Calle Madrid2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 600 32 19,20073 CS/SS 81 9,408$ Calle Monterey1Avenida Montezuma e/sAvenida Madero w/s2 235 32 7,52078 CS/SS 86 3,685$ Calle Monterey2Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2 440 32 14,08079 CS/SS 87 6,899$ Calle Monterey3Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Monterey4Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Monterey5Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Monterey6Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2 220 32 7,04089 None 89‐$ Calle Monterey7Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Monterey8Avenida Ramirez e/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Monterey9Avenida Vallajo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2 220 32 7,04089 None 89‐$ Calle Monterey10Avenida Herrera e/s Avenida Velasco w/s2 220 32 7,04081 CS/SS 89 3,450$ Calle Monterey11Avenida Velasco e/s Eisenhower Dr w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Monterey12Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ y/,$Calle Monterey13Avenida Martinez e/sAvenida Mendoza w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Monterey14Avenida Mendoza e/sAvenida Villa w/s2 220 32 7,04078 CS/SS 86 3,450$ Calle Monterey15Avenida Villa e/sAvenida Navarro w/s2 220 32 7,04078 CS/SS 86 3,450$ Calle Monterey16Avenida Navarro e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Nogales1Avenida Juarez e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 2,585 32 82,72079 CS/SS 87 40,533$ Calle Nogales2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s2 1,255 32 40,16076 CS/SS 84 19,678$ Calle Obispo1EndCalle Tampico n/s2 340 32 10,88075 CS/SS 83 5,331$ Calle Obispo2Calle Tampico s/sEnd2 345 32 11,04075 CS/SS 83 5,410$ Calle Palmeto1Calle Santa Barbara w/sCalle Placido w/s2 1,020 32 32,64087 None 87‐$ Calle Paloma1Avenida Tujunga s/sCalle Tampico n/s2 980 32 31,36091 None 91‐$ Calle Paloma2Calle Tampico s/sLa Fonda n/s2 625 32 20,00078 CS/SS 86 9,800$ Calle Paloma3La Fonda s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s2 590 32 18,88087 None 87‐$ Calle Placido1Calle Palmeto s/sNuevo Dr n/s2 490 32 15,68085 None 85‐$ Calle Placido2Nuevo Dr s/sCalle Sonrisa s/s2 545 32 17,44085 None 85‐$ Calle Potrero1Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero2Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2 220 32 7,04084 CS/SS 92 3,450$ Calle Potrero3Avenida Diaz e/s Avenida Rubio w/s2 225 32 7,20089 None 89‐$ 84219 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Potrero4Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2 225 32 7,20084 CS/SS 92 3,528$ Calle Potrero5Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s2 220 32 7,04083 CS/SS 91 3,450$ Calle Potrero6Avenida Obregon e/sAvendia Carranza w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Potrero7Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s 2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero8Avenida Ramirez e/sAvendia Vallejo w/s2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero9Avenida Vallejo e/sAvendia Herrera w/s2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero10Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco e/s2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Potrero11Avenida Velasco e/sAvenida Bernudas w/s2 200 32 6,40080 CS/SS 88 3,136$ Calle Prospero1Calle Palmeto s/sCDS2 675 32 25,07985 None 85‐$ Calle Quinto1Avenida Nuestra n/sLa Fonda s/s2 600 32 19,20082 CS/SS 90 9,408$ Calle Quinto2La Fonda n/sCalle Tampico s/s2 620 32 19,84082 CS/SS 90 9,722$ Calle Quinto3Calle Tampico n/sAvenida Ultimo s/s2 1,290 32 41,28087 None 87‐$ Calle Rondo1Call Tampico s/sAvenida Nuestra n/s2 1,275 32 40,80086 None 86‐$ Calle Rondo2Avenida Ultimo s/sCalle Tampico n/s2 1,275 32 40,80082 CS/SS 90 19,992$ Calle Santa Barbara1Calle Sonrisa n/sNuevo Rd s/s2 640 32 20,48084 CS/SS 92 10,035$ Calle Santa Barbara2Nuevo Dr n/sCalle Palmeto n/s2 400 32 12,80086 None 86‐$ Calle Serena1Vista Grande s/sEnd2 120 32 3,84089 None 89‐$ Calle Sinaloa1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 3,310 32 105,92066 DO/CS/SS 86 179,005$ Calle Sinaloa2Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Bermudas w/s4 1,265 82 84,83095 None 95‐$ $Calle Sonora1Avenida Montezuma e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 3,240 32 103,68083 CS/SS 91 50,803$ Calle Sonora2Eisenhower Dr e/s Avenida Bermudas w/s2 1,250 32 40,00078 CS/SS 86 19,600$ Calle Sonrisa1Calle Placido e/sCalle Santa Barbara e/s2 1,025 32 32,80085 None 85‐$ Calle Tamazula1Avenida NuestraLa Fonda s/s2 600 32 19,20073 CS/SS 81 9,408$ Calle Tampico1Eisenhower Drive e/sWashington St w/s4 3,950 72 247,080100 None 100‐$ Calle Tampico3Washington Street e/sPark Avenue e/s2 2,670 36 96,12078 CS/SS 86 47,099$ Calle Tecate1Avenida Bermudas e/sAvenida Madero w/s2 2,250 34 76,50088 None 88‐$ Calle Temecula1Avenida Madero e/sAvenida Juarez w/s2 220 32 7,04073 CS/SS 81 3,450$ Calle Temecula2Avenida Juarez e/sAvenida Diaz w/s2 220 32 7,04079 CS/SS 87 3,450$ Calle Temecula3Avenida Diaz e/sAvenida Rubio w/s2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Temecula4Avenida Rubio e/sAvenida Alvarado w/s2 220 32 7,04074 CS/SS 82 3,450$ Calle Temecula5Avenida Alvarado e/sAvenida Obregon w/s 2 220 32 7,04074 CS/SS 82 3,450$ Calle Temecula6Avenida Obregon e/sAvenida Carranza w/s2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Temecula7Avenida Carranza e/sAvenida Ramirez w/s2 220 32 7,04076 CS/SS 84 3,450$ Calle Temecula8Avenida Ramirez w/sAvenida Vallejo w/s2 220 32 7,04073 CS/SS 81 3,450$ Calle Temecula9Avenida Vallejo e/sAvenida Herrera w/s2 215 32 6,88076 CS/SS 84 3,371$ Calle Temecula10Avenida Herrera e/sAvenida Velasco w/s2 215 32 6,88081 CS/SS 89 3,371$ 85220 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalCalle Temecula11Avenida Velasco e/sEisenhower Dr w/s2 220 32 7,04077 CS/SS 85 3,450$ Calle Temecula12Eisenhower Dr e/sAvenida Martinez e/s2 220 32 7,04075 CS/SS 83 3,450$ Calle Vista Verde1Nuevo Rd s/sCDS2 705 32 26,03987 None 87‐$ Calle Yucatan1Avenida Alvarado w/sAvenida Juarez e/s2 845 32 27,04072 CS/SS 80 13,250$ Cameo Dunes Place1Cameo Palms n/sCDS2 185 28 7,07978 CS/SS 86 3,469$ Cameo Palm Drive1Singing Palms s/sHighland Palms n/s2 1,740 32 55,68077 CS/SS 85 27,283$ Camino Amarillo1Octotillo Drive w/sCDS2 380 32 15,63982 CS/SS 90 7,663$ Camino Azul1CDSCamino Rosada n/s2 980 36 33,23076 CS/SS 84 16,283$ Camino Del Oro1Camino Lavanda w/sOctotillo Drive e/s2 270 36 9,72082 CS/SS 90 4,763$ Camino Del Oro2Octotillo Drive w/sCamino Azul e/s2 600 36 21,60082 CS/SS 90 10,584$ Camino La Cresta1Camino Del Oro n/sCDS2 405 32 16,43980 CS/SS 88 8,055$ Camino Lavanda1CDSCDS2 1,025 32 39,75777 CS/SS 85 19,481$ Camino Rosada1Camino Azul w/sOctotillo Drive w/s2 655 36 23,58079 CS/SS 87 11,554$ Canterra Circle1Octotillo Drive e/sCDS2 360 32 14,92086 None 86‐$ Canterra Drive1Octotillo Drive w/sMilago Drive2 640 32 20,48082 CS/SS 90 10,035$ Carmen Place1Villeta Drive n/sCDS2 265 32 12,52575 CS/SS 83 6,137$ Carnes Circle1Seeley DriveCDS2 600 33 19,80084 CS/SS 92 9,702$ Carrie Lane1Victoria Drive s/sAshley Place s/s2 525 36 18,90077 CS/SS 85 9,261$ Cindy Court1Debbie Dr w/sCDS2 350 32 14,67981 CS/SS 89 7,193$ y/,$Cloud View Way1Summer View Way e/sDesert Fall Way s/s2 1,130 32 36,16073 CS/SS 81 17,718$ Coldbrook Lane1Miles Avenue s/sSunbrook Ln n/s2 150 36 5,40083 CS/SS 91 2,646$ Coldbrook Lane2Sunbrook Ln s/s Woodberry Ln s/s2 2,870 36 103,32078 CS/SS 86 50,627$ Commerce Court1Corporate Centre Dr s/sCDS2 190 36 10,29979 CS/SS 87 5,047$ Como Court1Genoa Dr w/sCDS2 675 32 25,07985 None 85‐$ Corporate Centre Drive1Dune Palm Rd w/sCDS3 625 36 22,50078 CS/SS 86 11,025$ Corporate Centre Drive2Adams St e/sCDS3 1,265 36 48,99980 CS/SS 88 24,010$ Cortez Ln1Roudel Ln w/sRoadrunner Ln e/s2 590 28 19,30494 None 94‐$ Cortez Ln2Roadrunner Ln e/sCDS2 190 26 7,94094 None 94‐$ Crestview Terrace1Highland Palms s/sCameo Palms n/s2 470 28 13,16077 CS/SS 85 6,448$ Cristol Place1Villeta DriveCDS2 190 32 10,12581 CS/SS 89 4,961$ CROISETTE COURT1Darby Rd s/sCDS2 535 30 18,75085 None 85‐$ Dalea Court1Blazing Star TrailCDS2 420 32 16,91984 CS/SS 92 8,290$ Dandelion Drive1Monticello Dr e/sLiberty Ave w/s2 790 32 25,28075 CS/SS 83 12,387$ Dandelion Drive2Monticello Ave w/sVerbena Dr e/s2 910 32 29,12082 CS/SS 90 14,269$ Dandelion Drive3Verbena Dr w/sCDS2 525 32 20,27982 CS/SS 90 9,937$ DARBY RD1Royal Palm DrCity Limits2 485 32 15,52087 None 87‐$ 86221 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalDate Palm Drive1Sagebrush Avenue s/sSaguaro Drive n/s2 520 32 16,64071 CS/SS 79 8,154$ Debbie Drive1Victoria Dr n/sKristen Ct n/s2 1,120 36 40,32084 CS/SS 92 19,757$ Declaration Court1Monticello Ave w/sCDS2 450 32 17,87981 CS/SS 89 8,761$ Deerbrook Circle1Stonebrook Ct e/s Bayberry Ln n/s2 470 32 15,04071 CS/SS 79 7,370$ Deerbrook Circle2Bayberry St s/sStonebrook Ct w/s2 920 32 29,44071 CS/SS 79 14,426$ Desert Air Street1Desert Stream n/sCDS2 1,325 32 43,27981 CS/SS 89 21,207$ Desert Club Drive1Avenue 52 n/sCalle Tampico s/s2 1,865 35 65,27569 DO/CS/SS 89 110,315$ Desert Club Drive2Calle Tampico n/sCDS2 1,000 35 35,00078 CS/SS 86 17,150$ Desert Crest Drive1Desert Air e/sDune Palms w/s2 1,140 37 42,18085 None 85‐$ Desert Eagle Ct1Desert StreamCDS2 640 32 20,48085 None 85‐$ Desert Fall Way1Summer View Way w/sCloud View Way w\s2 665 32 21,28073 CS/SS 81 10,427$ Desert Fox Drive1Desert Stream n/sDesert Crest s/s2 750 37 27,75085 None 85‐$ Desert Fox Drive2Desert Crest n/sCDS2 515 32 16,48085 None 85‐$ Desert Hills Court1Desert Crest n/sCDS2 520 32 16,64085 None 85‐$ Desert Rock Court1Desert Fox w/sCDS2 475 32 18,67986 None 86‐$ Desert Sand Court1Desert Crest n/sCDS2 515 32 16,48086 None 86‐$ Desert Stream Drive1Dune Palms Road w/sCarrie Ln e/s2 2,455 37 90,835100 None 100‐$ Desert View Court1Desert Crest Dr n/sCDS2 515 32 16,48085 None 85‐$ Desert Wind Court1Desert Air e/sCDS2 515 32 19,95987 None 87‐$ $Diane Drive1Bridgette Way w/sDebbie Dr e/s2 615 37 22,75583 CS/SS 91 11,150$ Diane Drive2Debbie Dr w/sCDS2 350 32 11,20079 CS/SS 87 5,488$ Dune Palms Road1Avenue 48Highway 111 s/s2 2,650 68 180,20072 CS/SS 80 88,298$ Dune Palms Road2Highway 111 n/sWestward Ho Drive s/s3 2,560 51 130,56078 CS/SS 86 63,974$ Dune Palms Road3Westward Ho Drive s/sMiles Rd s/s3 2,735 60 159,30069 DO/CS/SS 89 269,217$ Dune Palms Road4Miles Avenue n/sFred Waring Dr s/s4 2,565 61 156,46552 GR/OL 100 552,321$ Eisenhower Drive1Washington Street w/sCoachella Dr n/s4 4,060 58 235,48089 None 89‐$ Eisenhower Drive2Coachella Dr n/sAvenida Fernando s/s3 1,100 53 46,42088 None 88‐$ Eisenhower Drive3Avenida Fernando s/sAvenue 50 s/s4 1,845 71 111,67573 CS/SS 81 54,721$ Eisenhower Drive4Avenue 50 s/sCalle Tampico n/s2 2,430 50 121,50077 CS/SS 85 59,535$ Eisenhower Drive5Calle Tampico n/sCalle Nogales s/s4 2,045 72 107,160100 None 100‐$ Eisenhower Drive8Calle Nogales s/sAvenida Bermudas n/s4 5,225 72 325,92073 CS/SS 81 159,701$ Eisenhower Drive05AAvenue 52 s/sCalle Nogales s/s4 2,600 72 187,20077 CS/SS 85 91,728$ Estelo Court1Villeta DriveCDS2 155 32 8,91080 CS/SS 88 4,366$ Fiesta Drive1Jefferson Street w/sRoadrunner Lane e/s2 1,480 25 37,00077 CS/SS 85 18,130$ Forbes Circle1Seeley e/sVia Coronado E/S2 830 36 29,88074 CS/SS 82 14,641$ Foxtail Circle1Buttercup Lane s/sCDS2 450 32 17,87977 CS/SS 85 8,761$ 87222 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalFrances Hack Ln1Avenida Bermudas e/sCDS2 770 28 34,00554 GR/OL 100 120,038$ Franklin Court1Morris Ave s/sCDS2 145 32 8,11981 CS/SS 89 3,978$ Fred Waring Drive1Jefferson Street w/sDune Palms Road w/s3 2,650 70 185,50076 CS/SS 84 90,895$ Fred Waring Drive3Dunes Palms Rd w/sAdams Street e/s4 2,605 38 98,99084 CS/SS 92 48,505$ Fred Waring Drive4Adams Street w/sVenice Dr w/s6 2,585 91 198,56573 CS/SS 81 97,297$ Fred Waring Drive5Palm Royal w/sWashington Street e/s6 1,525 105 150,12562 DO/CS/SS 82 253,711$ Fred Waring Drive04aVenice Dr w/sPalm Royal w/s6 1,125 86 81,00065 DO/CS/SS 85 136,890$ Fronterra Drive1Octotillo Drive s/sLaderra Drive n/s2 570 32 18,24084 CS/SS 92 8,938$ Genoa Drive1Naples Dr n/aTorino Dr n/s2 760 36 27,36084 CS/SS 92 13,406$ Golden Sands1Cameo Palms DriveCDS2 180 28 6,93979 CS/SS 87 3,400$ Goldenrod Circle1Buttercup Lane n/sCDS2 540 32 20,75977 CS/SS 85 10,172$ Hancock Court1Liberty Ave w/sCDS2 260 32 11,79982 CS/SS 90 5,782$ Hemmings Way1Monticello Ave w/sAmerica Ct w/s2 285 32 9,12080 CS/SS 88 4,469$ Highland Palms1Washington Street w/sEnd2 1,210 32 38,72075 CS/SS 83 18,973$ Horseshoe Road1Roadrunner Lane e/sCDS2 1,000 25 29,10990 None 90‐$ Hummingbird Ln1Fiesta Dr s/sCDS2 200 25 6,847100 None 100‐$ Hwy 1111Washington St w/sAdams St w/s6 3,665 108 395,82064 DO/CS/SS 84 668,936$ Hwy 1112Adams St w/sJefferson St w/s6 5,325 100 532,50057 DO/CS/SS 77 899,925$ Independence Way1Monticello Way w/sCDS2 370 32 15,31980 CS/SS 88 7,506$ pyy/,$Independence Way2Monticello Way e/sJefferson Ave w/s2 745 32 23,84080 CS/SS 88 11,682$ Iris Court1Blazing Star Trail w/sCDS2 350 32 14,67979 CS/SS 87 7,193$ Irwin Circle1North Harland DriveCDS2 610 32 23,56584 CS/SS 92 11,547$ Jefferson Street1City LimitsFred Waring Dr n/s3 3,285 46 151,11078 CS/SS 86 74,044$ Jefferson Street2Avenue 54 n/sAvenue 52 s/s6 5,265 98 451,29075 CS/SS 83 221,132$ Jefferson Street3Avenue 52 n/sAvenue 50 s/s6 5,120 95 407,84075 CS/SS 83 199,842$ Jefferson Street4Avenue 50 s/s sharedAvenue 48 s/s shared3 5,255 42 220,71075 CS/SS 83 108,148$ Jefferson Street5Avenue 48 shared n/sCity Limit shared3 1,010 62 62,62080 CS/SS 88 30,684$ Jefferson Street6Highway 111 n/sVista Grande s/s6 685 104 66,44069 DO/CS/SS 89 112,284$ Jefferson Street7Vista Grande s/sFiesta Drive n/s2 765 62 47,43079 CS/SS 87 23,241$ Jefferson Street8Fiesta Drive n/sWestward ho Drive s/s2 1,150 55 45,25076 CS/SS 84 22,173$ Jefferson Street9Miles Avenue n/s sharedFred Waring Drive s/s sha3 2,565 42 107,73078 CS/SS 86 52,788$ Jefferson Street10Avenue 58 s/sS/S QUARRY LN2 1,680 28 47,04068 DO/CS/SS 88 79,498$ Jefferson Street08AWestward Ho Drive n/sMiles Ave s/s6 2,650 98 249,70080 CS/SS 88 122,353$ Kara Court1Bridgette Way w/sCDS2 400 32 12,80085 None 85‐$ Kaye Court1Debbie Dr w/sCDS2 350 32 14,67982 CS/SS 90 7,193$ Kristen Court1Debbie Dr w/sCDS2 350 32 14,67987 None 87‐$ 88223 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalLa Palma Drive1Adams Street w/sLas Vistas e/s2 1,600 36 57,60077 CS/SS 85 28,224$ La Palma Drive2Camino Azul w/sAdams Street e/s3 140 66 6,44084 CS/SS 92 3,156$ La Quinta Center1Hwy 111 s/sAvenue 47 n/s2 1,370 40 54,80082 CS/SS 90 26,852$ La Quinta Drive1Hwy 111 s/sEnd5 1,475 60 71,50085 None 85‐$ Ladera Drive1Los Manos Drive w/sFronterra Drive n/s2 350 36 12,60082 CS/SS 90 6,174$ Ladera Drive2Fronterra Drive w/sEnd2 510 36 18,36084 CS/SS 92 8,996$ Lake La Quinta 1Washington StCaleo Bay2 260 46 9,56088 None 88‐$ Las Vistas Drive1Fred Waring Drive s/sVileta Dr n/s2 425 36 28,69079 CS/SS 87 14,058$ Las Vistas Drive2Vileta Dr s/sSanita Dr n/s615 36 22,14081 CS/SS 89 10,849$ Las Vistas Drive3Sanita Dr s/sForbes Cir n/s285 36 10,26082 CS/SS 90 5,027$ Latigo Circle1Los Manos Drive e/sCDS2 280 32 12,43985 None 85‐$ Laurie Court1w/s Bridgette DrCDS2 395 32 16,11985 None 85‐$ Liberty Avenue1Morris Ave s/sDandelion Dr s/s2 935 32 29,92081 CS/SS 89 14,661$ Los Manos Drive1Miles Avenue n/sOctotillo Drive e/s2 1,050 32 33,60081 CS/SS 89 16,464$ Lowe Drive1Seeley Drive W/SNorth Harland Drive W/S2 840 36 30,24082 CS/SS 90 14,818$ Madison Street1Avenue 50 s/s sharedVista Bonita s/s shared1 2,605 12 31,260100 None 100‐$ Madison Street3Vista Bonita s/s sharedAvenue 52 n/s shared1 2,550 12 30,600100 None 100‐$ Madison Street4Avenue 54 s/sAirport Bl s/s4 5,225 82 336,650100 None 100‐$ Madison Street5Airport Boulevard s/sAvenue 58 n/s4 5,275 80 299,600100 None 100‐$ p$Madison Street6Avenue 58 s/sAvenue 60 n/s4 5,630 82 391,66083 CS/SS 91 191,913$ Madison Street03AN/S AVENUE 54S/S AVENUE 524 5,365 80 364,82083 CS/SS 91 178,762$ Main Street1Desert Club Dr e/sAvenida La Fonda n/s2 900 32 28,80078 CS/SS 86 14,112$ Malia Circle1Ladera DriveCDS2 170 32 8,91983 CS/SS 91 4,370$ Marguerite Court1Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2 400 32 16,27985 None 85‐$ Marigold Lane1Blazing Star Trail s/sButtercup Lane s/s2 975 32 31,20080 CS/SS 88 15,288$ Mariposa Court1Blazing Star Trail n/sCDS2 430 32 17,23974 CS/SS 82 8,447$ Memorial Place1Monticello Ave e/sCDS2 675 32 25,07983 CS/SS 91 12,289$ Messina Court1Torino Dr n/sCDS2 235 32 10,99983 CS/SS 91 5,390$ Milago Drive 1Canterra Drive s/sOctotillo Drive n/s2 350 32 11,20082 CS/SS 90 5,488$ Milan Court1Naples Dr n/sTorino Dr n/s2 765 36 27,54081 CS/SS 89 13,495$ Milan Court2Torino Dr n/sCDS2 235 32 10,99983 CS/SS 91 5,390$ Miles Avenue1Jefferson Ave w/s (Westbound Only)Dune Palms Road w/s (Westbound)4 2,655 76 168,31582 CS/SS 90 82,474$ Miles Avenue3Dune Palms Road w/sWashington Street e/s5 6,170 82 505,94075 CS/SS 83 247,911$ Monroe Street1Ave 62 n/sAve 61 n/s2 3,300 26 85,80077 CS/SS 85 42,042$ Monroe Street2Ave 61 n/sAve 60 n/s2 2,040 32 65,28071 CS/SS 79 31,987$ Monroe Street3Ave 60 n/s (southbound)Ave 58 n/s (southbound)1 5,380 14 75,32071 CS/SS 79 36,907$ 89224 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalMonroe Street4Ave 58 n/s shared2660' s/o Airport (southbound) 2 2,650 32 84,80072 CS/SS 80 41,552$ Monroe Street52660' s/o Airport (southbound) Airport Blvd s/s (southbound) 3 2,660 41 109,06079 CS/SS 87 53,439$ Monroe Street6Airport Blvd n/s (southbound)1985' n/o Airport Bl (southbound)2 1,985 32 63,52078 CS/SS 86 31,125$ Monroe Street71985' n/o Airport Bl (southbound) Avenue 54 s/s (southbound) 1 3,265 13 64,04594 None 94‐$ Monroe Street8Avenue 54 s/s (southbound) Avenue 53 n/s (southbound) 1 2,700 13 35,10072 CS/SS 80 17,199$ Monroe Street9Avenue 53 n/s (southbound) Avenue 52 s/s (southbound) 1 2,560 13 33,28034 GR/OL 100 117,478$ Monticello Avenue1Miles Ave n/sFred Waring s/s2 2,710 32 86,72078 CS/SS 86 42,493$ Morning Glory Court1Verbena Ave e/sCDS2 595 32 22,51982 CS/SS 90 11,034$ Morning Glory Court2Verbena Ave w/sCDS2 525 32 20,27983 CS/SS 91 9,937$ Morris Avenue1Monticello Ave e/sLiberty Ave e/s2 525 32 16,80080 CS/SS 88 8,232$ Morris Avenue2Monticello Ave w/s CDS2 460 32 18,19981 CS/SS 89 8,918$ Naples Drive1Milan Ct w/sGenoa Dr e/s2 1,945 36 70,02080 CS/SS 88 34,310$ Nolan Circle1North Harland DriveCDS2 585 33 22,69481 CS/SS 89 11,120$ North Harland Drive1Miles Avenue n/sWest Harland Drive s/s2 1,000 36 36,00081 CS/SS 89 17,640$ Nuevo Drive1Los Manos Drive e/sDune Palms Rd w/s2 1,530 36 55,08085 None 85‐$ Ocotillo Drive1Adams Street e/sFronterra Drive w/s2 575 36 20,70083 CS/SS 91 10,143$ Ocotillo Drive2Fronterra DriveCDS2 1,760 36 61,68077 CS/SS 85 30,223$ Pala Circle1Canterra Drive s/sCDS2 130 32 7,63986 None 86‐$ Palermo Court1Torino Dr n/sCDS2 235 32 10,99984 CS/SS 92 5,390$ /,$Palm Garden Place1Cameo Palms n/sCDS2 180 28 7,82482 CS/SS 90 3,834$ Palm Royal1Washington St e/sRome Dr. n/s3 2,715 53 143,49581 CS/SS 89 70,313$ Palm Royal2Rome Dr. n/sFred Waring n/s2 410 28 11,48080 CS/SS 88 5,625$ Paloma Court1Calle Paloma w/sEnd2 310 32 9,92074 CS/SS 82 4,861$ Park Avenue1Calle Tampico n/sAvenue 502 2,730 40 109,20080 CS/SS 88 53,508$ Parkbrook Court1Birchcrest Cir w/sCDS2 230 32 11,40584 CS/SS 92 5,588$ Parma Court1Torino Dr n/sCDS2 235 32 10,99983 CS/SS 91 5,390$ Pompeii Court1Venice Dr w/sCDS2 685 32 25,39983 CS/SS 91 12,446$ Ramblewood Ct1Sunbrook LnEnd2 320 32 13,71980 CS/SS 88 6,722$ Randolph Court1Monticello Ave w/sCDS2 190 32 9,55982 CS/SS 90 4,684$ Roadrunner Lane1Cortez Lane n/sWestward Ho Drive s/s2 1,200 25 30,00097 None 97‐$ Rockberry Court1Coldbrook Ln w/sCDS2 385 32 16,36576 CS/SS 84 8,019$ Rome Drive1Milan Ct w/sPalm Royal e/s2 180 28 5,04089 None 89‐$ Roudel Ln1Cortez Ln n/sEnd2 600 25 15,00086 None 86‐$ Saffron Court1Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2 400 32 16,27982 CS/SS 90 7,977$ Sagebrush Avenue1160' w/o Date Palm Drive Washington Street e/s2 1,350 32 43,20071 CS/SS 79 21,168$ Saguaro Drive1CDSDATE PALM W/S2 1,260 32 41,94071 CS/SS 79 20,551$ 90225 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalSalerno Court1Torino Dr n/sCDS2 235 32 10,99985 None 85‐$ San Marino Court1Venice Dr w/sCDS2 685 32 25,39979 CS/SS 87 12,446$ Sand Flower Place1Cameo Plams n/sCDS2 180 28 7,82482 CS/SS 90 3,834$ Sanita Drive1Arosa Way s/sCDS2 1,720 36 65,03975 CS/SS 83 31,869$ Seasons Way1Calle Tampico n/sSpringtime Way s/s2 450 36 16,20041 GR/OL 100 57,186$ Seeley Drive1Forbes Circle s/sBradford Circle n/s2 570 36 20,52082 CS/SS 90 10,055$ Seeley Drive2Bradford CircleMiles Avenue2 470 73 29,57082 CS/SS 90 14,489$ Shadwell Circle1Monticello Ave w/sCDS2 300 32 13,07978 CS/SS 86 6,409$ Siena Court1Genoa Dr w/sCDS2 675 32 25,07985 None 85‐$ Silver Rock1S/S Avenue 52Club House2 3,000 35 105,00098 None 98‐$ Silver Rock2Club HouseJefferson Ave w/s2 5,570 30 167,100100 None 100‐$ Simon Drive1Washington Street e/sHighway 111 s/s2 1,035 61 63,13595 None 95‐$ Singing Palms Drive1Washington Street w/sCameo Palm Drive w/s2 250 32 8,00086 None 86‐$ Singing Palms Drive2Cameo Palms Drive CDS2 200 32 8,29982 CS/SS 90 4,067$ Sonesta Way1Villeta Drive n/sVilleta Drive n/s2 1,120 36 40,32072 CS/SS 80 19,757$ Springbrook Court1Sunbrook Ln n/sCDS2 135 32 7,79972 CS/SS 80 3,822$ Springtime Way1Desert Club e/sCDS2 1,240 36 43,04064 DO/CS/SS 84 72,738$ Star Flower Trail1Dune Palms Road e/sCDS2 1,200 36 46,67978 CS/SS 86 22,873$ Stonebrook Court1Deerbrook Cir n/sCDS2 290 32 12,75968 DO/CS/SS 88 21,563$ //,$Summer View Way1Springtime Way n/sDesert Fall Way n/s2 480 32 15,36065 DO/CS/SS 85 25,958$ Summerbrook Court1Coldbrook Ln w/sCDS2 150 32 8,27964 DO/CS/SS 84 13,992$ Sunberry Court1Birchcrest Circle n/sCDS2 120 32 5,37684 CS/SS 92 2,634$ Sunbrook Ln1Woodberry Ln s/sCDS2 2,600 36 96,72065 DO/CS/SS 85 163,457$ Sweetbush Lane1Buttercup Lane n/sCDS2 545 32 20,91983 CS/SS 91 10,250$ Tiara Place1Villeta Drive n/sCDS2 260 32 11,79981 CS/SS 89 5,782$ Torino Drive1Genoa Dr w/sMilan Ct e/s2 1,850 37 68,45083 CS/SS 91 33,541$ Tortola Circle1Ladera DriveCDS2 165 32 8,75985 None 85‐$ Venice Drive1Fred Waring n/sNaples Rd s/s2 125 47 3,87582 CS/SS 90 1,899$ Venice Drive2Naples Rd n/sTorino Dr s/s2 710 36 25,56085 None 85‐$ Verbena Drive1Star Flower Trail s/sMiles Ave n/s2 740 36 26,64080 CS/SS 88 13,054$ Verbena Drive2Star Flower Trail n/sCDS2 400 32 16,27978 CS/SS 86 7,977$ Verona Court1Torino Dr n/sCDS2 235 32 10,99984 CS/SS 92 5,390$ Via Caliente1Via Del Monte e/sEnd2 340 37 12,58081 CS/SS 89 6,164$ Via Coronado1Forbes Circle s/sCDS2 720 37 30,11982 CS/SS 90 14,758$ Via Del Monte1Via Sevilla s/sVia Caliente s/s2 315 37 11,65583 CS/SS 91 5,711$ Via Del Sol1Via Sevilla n/sCDS2 185 33 9,58486 None 86‐$ 91226 City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget 2021NameSection FromToLns Length Width AreaPCI BeforeMaintenancePCI AfterTotalVia Sevilla1Via Coronado w/sWashington St e/s2 2,185 37 80,84582 CS/SS 90 39,614$ Via Tranquillo1Vista Grande s/sEnd2 120 32 3,84088 None 88‐$ Victoria Drive1Bridgette Way w/sAdams St e/s2 1,140 37 42,18086 None 86‐$ Villeta Drive1Sanita Drive n/sSonesta Drive s/s2 3,600 36 129,60075 CS/SS 83 63,504$ Violet Court1Bridgette Way w/sCDS2 395 32 16,11986 None 86‐$ Vista Grande1Jefferson Street e/sEnd2 925 37 34,22588 None 88‐$ Wakefield Circle1Coldbrook Ln s/sCold Brook Ln s/s2 1,950 32 62,40070 CS/SS 78 30,576$ Washington Street1Avenue 52 s/sCalle Tampico n/s4 1,410 92 110,20097 None 97‐$ Washington Street2Calle Tampico n/sAvenida Montero n/s6 4,435 92 369,300100 None 100‐$ Washington Street4Avenida Montero n/sEisenhower Drive n/s7 1,890 112 211,68072 CS/SS 80 103,723$ Washington Street5Eisenhower Drive n/sAvenue 47 n/s6 4,440 92 360,78078 CS/SS 86 176,782$ Washington Street7Avenue 47 n/sSimon Drive s/s5 1,780 86 153,08077 CS/SS 85 75,009$ Washington Street8Simon Drive s/sHighway 111 s/s8 965 99 80,88579 CS/SS 87 39,634$ Washington Street9Highway 111 n/sMiles Avenue n/s6 2,845 86 217,83074 CS/SS 82 106,737$ Washington Street11Miles Avenue n/sVia Sevilla n/s6 1,600 99 137,68073 CS/SS 81 67,463$ Washington Street12Via Sevilla n/sFred Waring Drive s/s6 1,670 88 128,90080 CS/SS 88 63,161$ Washington Street13Fred Waring Drive n/sCity Limit6 2,955 82 212,43582 CS/SS 90 104,093$ Washington Street Frontal1Washington Street w/sSinging Palms n/s1 185 18 3,33082 CS/SS 90 1,632$ Washington Street Frontal2Singing Palms n/sHighland Palms n/s2 1,800 30 54,00068 DO/CS/SS 88 91,260$ gggg//,$Washington Street Frontal3Highland Palm n/s Washington St w/s2 1,000 30 30,00066 DO/CS/SS 86 50,700$ West Harland Drive1North Harland Drive e/sLas Vistas Drive e/s2 835 36 30,06080 CS/SS 88 14,729$ Westward Ho Drive1Jefferson St w/s (Eastbound Only) Dune Palms Rd e/s (Eastbound) 22,620 30 78,60079 CS/SS 87 38,514$ Williamstone Way1Liberty Ave w/sMonticello Ave e/s2 600 32 19,20082 CS/SS 90 9,408$ Willow Circle1Blazing Star Trail s/sCDS2 325 32 13,87985 None 85‐$ Winter Cove Court1Summer View Way e/sCDS2 420 32 13,44079 CS/SS 87 6,586$ Woodberry Ln1Adams St w/sSunbrook Ln e/s2 120 36 4,32083 CS/SS 91 2,117$ 80 87 16,177,062$ 92227 228 SH-111 60TH AVE MONROE ST54TH AVE 50TH AVE 62ND AVE MILES AVE 52ND AVE JACKSON ST48TH AVE FRED WARING DR 49TH AVE WASHINGTON STLIGAAVENUE 52 MADISON STCITRUSDUNE PALMS RDAIRPORT BLVD PGA BLVD58TH AVEAVENIDA VALLEJOAVENIDA RUBIO61ST AVERIVIERA JEFFERSON STOAK HILLAVENIDA VILLAADAMS STAVENUE 58AVENIDA MARTINEZSHIELDS RDWINGED FOOTHERMITAGE DARBY RD HJORTH STMER ION 51ST AVEEISENHOWER DRCALLE TAMPICO MANDARINA WEISKOPF 55TH AVEVIA DONAWARNER TRLROSS AVEBURR STDEL GATO DRVIA SAVONACALLE SINALOA VIA PAESSARO 47TH AVE 46TH AVE OASIS STAVENIDA MADEROPARK AVELIMA VILLAGE DR CSILLA ST CETRINO B O N IT A T R L PIRKER DR ANDALUSIACALEO BAYC O A C H ELL A D RQUAIL RUN LNARACENA SPANISH BAY TOM FAZIO LN NSEELEY DRYOUNGS LNMI SSI ON DR WTOPAZ DRR ON D AFIRESTONEEMERALD DR MOUNTAIN VIEW VIA DDCALLE HIDALGO TOM FAZIO LN SVISTA ESTRELLAVIA P A VIO N POMELO ST AVENIDA BERMUDASTORINO DR JASPER PARK AVE TEE ST PARK LNPALM DRPOLO RDCORTEZ PLFIESTA DR N U E VO D R V IA C A P R ISAND DR53RD AVEBORDEAUX DRAPPIAN WAYTANGELOYALE STPEBBLE BEACH DR VI A B O L E R OBRADSHAW TRLCALLE NORTE VIA LUGOLA QUINTA DRPECOS PL CONTENTOSILVER ROCKHAWKEYE DR ZENDA DR VIA BRAVA LUNDBERG LNARDENNAIS DRVICTORIA DR LIBERTY ST58TH AVEMADISON STADAMS STADAMS STADAMS ST51ST AVEJEFFERSON STAIRPORT BLVD ® Legend La Quinta Private Streets Maintenance None CS/SS DO/CS/SS GR/OL City of La Quinta Unlimited Budget Map 2021 93229 230 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 16, 2021 STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION •Adopt a resolution to adopt a Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2020-0001. • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The Villas at Indian Springs project was approved in 2016 which included a zone change, specific plan, site development permit, and tentative tract map to allow for 16 single family homes on the southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Palm Circle Drive. The project was redesigned to modify access to the project and approved in 2019. •The Applicant proposes a different project on this site for a new 40-unit multifamily residential apartment project, the Jefferson Street Apartments (Attachment 1). •The project includes repealing the existing Specific Plan, a new site development permit for building and landscape design, tentative parcel map to reorganize the parcels on the site, an environmental assessment, and a variance to exceed height and setback limitations from the image corridor development standards. FISCAL IMPACT – None. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 231 Adopt a resolution to approve Specific Plan 2020 0001, Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001, Site Development Permit 2020-0001, and Variance 2020-0001, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT A SUBSEQUENT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2020- 0001) AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0001, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2020-0001, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-0001, AND VARIANCE 2020- 0001 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 40-UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT PROJECT; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED A SUBSEQUENT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2020-0001; LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND PALM CIRCLE DRIVE BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The proposed development consists of an approximately 5.36-acre project site (Site) that was originally part of the Westward Ho residential community (Attachment 2). The site once contained several residences and a portion of a golf course, which were established in the early 1970’s. The homes were subsequently purchased by the City and demolished to allow construction of the Jefferson Street Bridge in 2006. The Applicant entered into a purchase and sale agreement with the City in November 2014 to purchase the properties, under Agreement 2014-0023; Resolution 2014-058. In 2016, the Site was approved for the Villas at Indian Springs project, a 16 single family residential home project. The approval included a Specific Plan (SP), Site Development Permit (SDP), Tentative Tract Map, and Zone Change from Low Density Residential and Golf Course to Medium Density Residential. The SP was approved for deviations in development standards including setbacks, heights, and minimum lot sizes. The Zone Change was required to change to Medium Density Residential, which made the property’s zoning consistent with its General Plan land use designation. The project was approved for a revision in 2019 which changed access to the project from Palm Circle Drive to Jefferson Street, with no other changes to the project. Access via Palm Circle Drive was and is not available because the applicant was unable to secure full approval from the neighboring residential community which controls this access. The Applicant is now proposing a 40-unit multifamily residential apartment project (Project) on this Site (Attachment 3). The Project consists of a total of five buildings and includes a common area with a pool, covered parking, and landscaping throughout. Specific Plan The Applicant is proposing a repeal of the effective Specific Plan 2015-0002 “Villas at Indian Springs Specific Plan” (Attachment 4). Repealing this SP would remove the SP from the site and result in the project site being regulated by its underlying zoning designation of Medium Density Residential (RM). SP 2015- 0002 was drafted and approved specifically for the 16-unit Villas at Indian Springs project. The currently proposed project is designed to fit within the City of La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) standards. The density proposed at 40 units on 5.26-acre site is within the RM zone’s allowance of 4-8 units per acre. All other LQMC development standards under the RM zone are met by this project, with the exception of image corridor standards. Site Development Permit The Applicant proposes SDP approval for the site, architectural, and landscaping design of the project. The project takes access off Jefferson Street with right in, right out access. The project includes a total of five (5) buildings located on 232 the northern and southern part of the project, with the middle section including covered parking and a common area with pool which was purposely designed to help preserve views from the existing residential homes to the east of the Project. The Project includes a total of 104 parking spaces, which is the exact amount required per the LQMC, broken down as follows: the 36 two-bedroom units require two (2) covered spaces per unit, for a total of 72 spaces; the four (4) three-bedroom units require three (3) covered spaces for a total of 12; all forty units require 0.5 guest spaces per unit, for a total of 20; in summation, a total of 104 spaces are required and provided. The parking spaces will be covered with 8 ft tall metal carports, with some covered by landscaping. The project also includes a common open area in the center of the site, including two lawn areas, shade structures, picnic tables, and a 788 square feet (sf) pool. The architectural style proposed is a modern design, with each building having similar architectural modern features (Attachment 3). Four (4) of the apartment buildings are two-story buildings and one is a one-story building. The project includes 40 apartment units ranging from 1,113 sf to 1,430 sf, with 36 units having two bedrooms and four (4) units having three bedrooms. The buildings utilize flat roofs that vary in height, combined with varying wall depths that create variation in the buildings to prevent monotony. The buildings use earth base tones, accented by gray and blue colors (Attachment 3, Page A004). Landscaping is proposed throughout the project site including within the parking lot. The existing planter area along Jefferson Street, which already has existing and maintained landscaping, will remain. The proposed plant palette incorporates typical desert compatible species such as Chilean Mesquite, red yucca, and century plants. Lighting proposed within the parking lot meets the City’s parking lot lighting standards and includes 17 ft tall light poles with downward facing lights and LED lights attached to the carports. Variance The project proposes a variance from LQMC Section 9.50.020, Height Limits and Setbacks Near Image Corridors, which stipulates that all buildings within 150 ft of the edge of right of way of general plan-designated image corridors shall be “limited to one story, not to exceed 22 ft in height” (Attachment 5). The project proposes two-story buildings with a 25 ft maximum height within 150 ft of Jefferson Street, an image corridor (Attachment 6). The variance is being requested due to the size and shape of the project site which poses a constraint on development of a multifamily residential project. The project site is narrow in width, measuring approximately 190 ft within the center of the project site and not varying by much throughout, providing limited development area within the 150 ft image corridor standard. The applicant 233 worked through different scenarios and site designs of a single-story multifamily residential project but did not find one that would meet all other development standards including required parking, density, landscaping, and open common area. Another constraint aside from the shape of the site is that the City boundaries along Jefferson, interrupt the image corridor in this area. The variance request is to allow for the project to be two stories and three (3) ft above the maximum 22 ft height, in order to provide the forty-unit project within the project site and meet all other standards. The maximum height of 25 ft is less than the underlying zone maximum height of 28 ft. Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Parcel Map 37891 is proposed to establish the project under one parcel meanwhile distinguishing the open space lots and right of way (Attachment 7). The Tentative Parcel Map has been reviewed and found consistent with the Subdivision Map Act. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review This project was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Tribal Consultation As per SB-18 and AB-52 (2004) consultation requirements, information regarding the proposed Specific Plan was forwarded to those Tribes referenced on the Tribal Consultation List provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Staff has followed up with all Tribes requesting information or consultation and placed their recommendations for monitoring in the Conditions of Approval. Planning Commission At its regular meeting on January 26, 2021, the Planning Commission by unanimous vote adopted PC Resolution 2021-0002 and PC Resolution 2021- 0003, which recommended City Council approve this project. Public Notice This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on February 5, 2021 and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. Written comments on this project will be provided to the City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Under Environmental Assessment 2015-0002, a mitigated negative declaration was adopted for the Villas at Indian Springs project. The Planning Division has prepared Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 for this project, in compliance 234 with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration (SMND) was prepared to determine changes in project scope and potential impacts from the previously approved project. The SMND was distributed to various public agencies and interested parties and is attached to this staff report as Exhibit A of the Resolution. No comments on the SMND were received during the 30-day comment period. The Division has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because mitigation measures have been incorporated. Prepared by: Carlos Flores, Senior Planner Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1.Project Information 2.Vicinity Map 3.Jefferson Apartments Plan Set 4.Specific Plan 5.LQMC Image Corridor Section 6.Image Corridor Map 7.Tentative Parcel Map 37891 235 236 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A SUBSEQUENT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE JEFFERSON STREET APARTMENTS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND PALM CIRCLE DRIVE CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2020-0001 APPLICANT: JIM SNELLENBERGER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16th day of February, 2021, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Jim Snellenberger for approval of the Jefferson Street Apartments, generally located at the southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Palm Circle Drive, more particularly described as: APN 600-080-041, 600-080-042, AND 600-080-001 THROUGH 600-080-009 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on February 5, 2021 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 26th day of January, 2021, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Jim Snellenberger for approval of the Jefferson Street Apartments, and recommended adoption of said Environmental Assessment via Planning Commission Resolution 2021-0002; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on the 20th day of September 2016, adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration under Environmental Assessment 2015-0002 via Resolution 2016-0039 for the Villas at Indian Springs project located on this project site; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant 237 Council Resolution 2021 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 2 of 3 to California Environmental Quality Act to justify approval of said Environmental Assessment: 1.The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 2.The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable can be mitigated to be less than significant. 3.The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Impacts associated with biological resources, cultural and tribal resources, and noise can be mitigated to be less than significant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby adopts Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 with the mitigation measures incorporated (Exhibit A). PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 16th day of February 2021, by the following vote: AYES: 238 Council Resolution 2021 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments Adopted: February 16, 2021 Page 3 of 3 NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 239 240 CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: (760) 777-7000 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY Project Title: Jefferson Street Apartments Case No: Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 Specific Plan 2020-0001 Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Lead Agency City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 777-7125 Applicant: Jim Snellenberger Global Development LLC Snellenberger Built Inc. 77622 Country Club Drive, Suite N Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 423-6561 Contact Person: Carlos Flores Senior Planner City of La Quinta (760) 777-7069 Project Location: Southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Palm Circle Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 General Plan Designation: Medium/High Density Residential and Open Space - Natural Zoning: Medium Density Residential District (RM) and Floodplain (FP) Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial; golf course; single-family residential South: Coachella Stormwater Channel; single-family residential East: Medium density residential (condominiums); golf course; Coachella Stormwater Channel West: Jefferson Street; golf course; low density single-family residential EXHIBIT A 241 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 2 Project Description: The Project site consists of 5.36-acres of irregularly shaped vacant land (Assessor’s Parcel No. 600-080-041, 600-080-042, and 600-080-001 through 600-080-009). The Project site can be divided into three parts: 1) a 3.22-acre parcel for development of the proposed Project (subject property); 2) 0.46-acre landscaped area on the west of the subject property and 0.36-acre right-of- way within Jefferson Street; 3) a 1.32-acre remainder located in the Coachella Stormwater Channel. The Project proposes the development of a 40-unit apartment complex on the 3.22-acre parcel (net Project area, or “subject property”). The Project will include 36 two-bedroom units and four three- bedroom units in five buildings with a maximum 25’ building height (see Table 1). Amenities include a pool and common areas with barbecue facilities located in the center of the complex. Sufficient surface parking is proposed between the buildings and common areas, consistent with the Zoning Ordinance (see Table 2 and Exhibit 4). The Project will include a 6-foot block wall along the subject property boundary. Entrance to the Project will be on Jefferson Street and not gated. Emergency access will be provided at three locations: an existing fire access gate on the southwest corner facing the landscaped area and Jefferson Street, and two new fire access gates on the northwest and northeast corners facing Palm Circle Drive (see Exhibit 4). Access to the existing development east of the Project site is via Palm Circle, a private street that intersects with Jefferson Street. The existing traffic pattern for Palm Circle allows for right turns only onto Jefferson Street from the existing 28-unit condominium development. The median island in Jefferson Street allows for left turns onto Palm Circle. The Project proposes access from Jefferson Street via a driveway with a minimum width of 28.0 feet with standard City of La Quinta curb returns with a radius of 35.0 feet. The existing landscape median island in Jefferson Street will ensure that turning movements into and out of the Project from Jefferson Street are limited to right turns only. Table 1 Net Project Area Breakdown Number of Units Area (square feet) Building 1 (2-story) 8 5,412.7 Building 2 (2-story) 12 8,450 Building 3 (1-story) 2 2,683.4 Building 4 (1 & 2-story) 6 5,409 Building 5 (2-story) 12 8,450 Building Total 40 30,405 Parking 104 spaces 40,868 Landscaping - 53,877 Hardscape Area - 14,329 Pool Area - 788 Project Total - 140,267 242 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 3 Table 2 Parking Breakdown Parking Ratio Number of Units Number of Spaces Provided 2 covered spaces per 2-bedroom unit 36 72 3 covered spaces per 3-bedroom unit 4 12 0.5 guest spaces per unit 40 20 Total Required/Provided - 104 ADA parking (2% of assigned parking + 5% of unassigned parking) - 4 (3 required) EV spaces (3% of parking) - 4 The City is processing the following applications for the Project: Specific Plan 2020-0001: To rescind the existing Specific Plan which was adopted for the previously approved project on this property (see below). Site Development Permit 2020-0001: To allow the site plan, architecture and landscaping proposed for the Project. Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001: To merge the existing parcels into one parcel. Variance 2020-0001: To allow the Project to construct two-story buildings in excess of 22 feet within 150 feet of Jefferson Street in an Image Corridor. Project History The 3.22-acre parcel proposed for development was originally part of the Westward Ho residential community. The site once contained several residences and a portion of the now adjacent golf course, which were established beginning in the early 1970’s. The homes were subsequently purchased by the City and demolished to allow construction of the Jefferson Street bridge in 2006. The applicant entered into a purchase and sale agreement with the city in November 2014 (AGR2014-0023; Resolution 2014-058), to purchase the properties. The applicant submitted development applications (Specific Plan, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Permit) to subdivide the 3.22-acre site into 16 single-family lots and to develop the Villas at Indian Springs (previous project). The applicant was not able to obtain an easement from the Westward Isles HOA to use Palm Circle drive for access to his project, and also has found that the real estate market for for-sale product was not conducive to the success of the project. As a result, the applicant modified the project to the current proposed apartments. The Mitigated Negative Declaration (March 2016) studied the potential impacts of the previous project on aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, and utilities. 243 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 4 This Initial Study tiers from the original document, and analyzes the impacts of the currently proposed Project as a whole. Impacts on agriculture and forestry resources, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, mineral resources, and wildfire are consistent with the original document. Impacts on aesthetics, air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation, tribal cultural resources and utilities and service systems would differ from the original document given the changes in the proposed Project from the original project. These impacts are analyzed for the proposed Project as a whole. Project Location and Limits: Parcel A: APN 600-080-041 and 600-080-042 Portion Northwest Section 28, Township 5 South, Range 7 East BM Parcel B: APN: 600-080-001 Through 600-080-009 Lots 31 - 39, Inclusive, of Tract 2190 Other Required Public Agency Approvals: None. 244 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 5 MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM Jefferson Street Apartments Project Subsequent Initial Study Resource Topic Mitigation Measures Responsible Party/ Monitoring Party Monitoring Biological Resources BIO-1 To comply with the MBTA, any vegetation or tree removal, or other ground disturbing activities occurring between January 1st and August 31st with the potential to impact nesting birds shall require a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey to determine if there is a potential impact to such species. All vegetation and suitable nesting habitat (including open ground) on the Project site, whether or not it will be removed or disturbed, shall be surveyed for nesting birds. If no nests are present, this condition will be cleared. Conducting construction activities outside the breeding season (September 1st through December 31st) can avoid having to implement these measures. If active nests of any native bird are found on site, they will be avoided until after the young have fledged. Project applicant, Project biologist, City Planning Division The City’s Planning Division shall assure that necessary nesting bird surveys are completed in compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and applicable protocol. Cultural and Tribal Resources CUL-1 Earth-moving activities including grading, grubbing, trenching, or excavations at the site shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and an Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Native American monitor. If any cultural materials more than 50 years of age are discovered, they shall be recorded and evaluated in the field. The monitors shall be prepared to recover artifacts quickly to avoid construction delays but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for controlled archaeological recovery if a substantial cultural deposit is encountered. The monitors shall determine when excavations have reached sufficient depth to preclude the occurrence of cultural resources, and when monitoring should conclude. If artifacts are discovered, these shall be processed, catalogued, analyzed, and prepared for permanent curation in a repository with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for additional research in the future. Project applicant, Project archaeologist, Tribal monitor, Planning Division, City Engineer. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the site, the applicant shall provide a fully executed monitoring agreement to the City. Within 30 days of the completion of ground disturbing activities on the Project site, a report of findings shall be filed with the City. The report will summarize the methods and results of the monitoring program, including an itemized inventory and a detailed analysis of recovered artifacts, upon completion of the field and laboratory work. The report should include an interpretation of the cultural activities represented by the artifacts and a discussion of the significance of all archaeological finds. 245 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 6 Resource Topic Mitigation Measures Responsible Party/ Monitoring Party Monitoring Noise NOI-1 A six-foot high noise attenuation barrier, conforming to the recommended criteria of the approved noise impact analysis dated 3/25/15 and prepared by Urban Crossroads, shall be incorporated into the Project. NOI-2 An interior noise analysis shall be submitted with building plans for individual buildings are submitted, to assure that all residential units shall have interior noise levels of 45 dBA CNEL, consistent with the recommended interior noise mitigation criteria of the of the approved noise impact analysis dated 3/25/15, prepared by Urban Crossroads. Planning Division, Building Division, Project Contractor The City’s Planning and Building Divisions shall assure that necessary mitigation measures as identified are incorporated into the final building construction plans. 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 16 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology /Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities / Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance 256 257 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 18 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 258 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 19 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; La Quinta Municipal Code. The proposed Project would result in 5 one and two story apartment buildings where single family homes were proposed for the previous project. The building heights would increase as a result of the proposed Project, although the intensity of mass would decrease at the ground level, since buildings are proposed to be clustered. As described below, although changes to the Project are proposed, the impacts associated with aesthetics would remain less than significant. Setting The City of La Quinta, including the Project site, is located in the Coachella Valley, which is a desert valley that extends approximately 45 miles in Riverside County, southeast from the San Bernardino Mountains to the northern shore of the Salton Sea. The Project site occurs in an urban environment, near the City’s eastern boundary with the City of Indio. The current urban environment includes golf course, commercial and primarily single-family residential uses, the Coachella Stormwater Channel, and major roadways. 259 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 20 The Santa Rosa Mountains form a dramatic backdrop to the City’s western boundary. Other mountains providing a visual resource for La Quinta include the San Bernardino Mountains to the northwest, Little San Bernardino Mountains to the north, and the Indio Hills to the northeast and east, below the Little San Bernardinos. There are no state-designated scenic highways in proximity to the Project site. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. Ultimate development of the Project site will result in a multi- family residential neighborhood. Discussion a, c) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will comprise of 38% landscape area, 10% hardscape area and 1% pool area, a total of 49% open area that exceeds the 30% minimum standard set by the Zoning Code (Section 9.50.030). Properties in the Project vicinity generally enjoy views of the Santa Rosa Mountains located to the west and southwest. The San Bernardino Mountains to the northwest, Little San Bernardino Mountains to the north, and the Indio Hills to the northeast and east are further away and views from the Project area are partially obstructed by existing mature palm trees and structures. Segments of Jefferson Street, including west of the Project area, are designated as an Image Corridor in the 2035 General Plan because it affords close and largely unobstructed views of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Development along Image Corridors is limited to a maximum structure height of 22 feet within 150 feet of the ultimate right-of-way. The proposed Project includes three 2-story buildings and one partially two-story building with a maximum structure height of 25 feet and a one-story building with a maximum structure height of 14 feet 6 inches. The three two-story buildings are along Jefferson Street with a total setback of 46 feet from the proposed right-of-way. Therefore, the Project proponent is applying for a variance on the structure height and single-story limitations in Municipal Code Section 9.50.030. However, Project-related impacts on scenic quality are considered less than significant, as analyzed below. As noted, scenic vistas in the Project vicinity are mainly views of the Santa Rosa Mountains to the west and southwest. Thus, at Project buildout, the most impacted viewers would be those looking past the Project to the west and southwest. The single-family homes east of the Project site currently have views of the Santa Rosa Mountains located to the west and southwest, though the lower elevations are blocked by intervening development. For the three proposed buildings facing the existing homes, Building 2 (2-story) is located out of the 70-feet clearance for one-story development limit, Building 3 (1-story) is partially within the 70-feet clearance, and Building 4 (1 & 2-story) is 1-story for the portion within the clearance area. The limitation of the buildings to single story development within the clearance area will reduce Project impacts on the existing homes associated with aesthetics and views, because they will provide low building heights closest to the existing buildings, and the limited mass of buildings will allow views between structures, thereby decreasing the visual blockage to the west and southwest. 260 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 21 Currently, views to the east from Jefferson Street are largely obstructed by the existing single family homes, with only the top and some mid-range views of the Indio Hills. The Project will add five one to two-story buildings in two ‘clusters’, with parking and common open area in the middle; therefore, the Project would not significantly impact the top and mid-range views of Indio Hills due to their distance and current level of existing development obstruction. Views to the north past the Project site are partially obstructed by existing commercial development, with only the top and some mid-range views of the Little San Bernardino Mountains visible. Project-related impacts would be less than significant given the distance and current level of existing development obstruction. Views to the south past the Project site are limited to the top and some mid-range views of the Santa Rosa Mountains due to topography and intervening development. While the Project will partially obstruct the mid-range views, impacts are expected to be less than significant given the limited building size, and the fact that a commercial building occurs north of the project, rather than residential development, whose viewers are temporary visitors to the site. Overall, Project impacts to viewers within the Jefferson Street right-of-way are expected to be less than significant given the limited size of buildings and their immediate proximity to existing development. The modern architecture style employed in the Project design is compatible with the adjacent commercial building and does not conflict with the nearby residential homes. The Project design features flat varying roof lines which minimize visual impacts of the proposed buildings. The overall impacts on aesthetics and scenic resources from development of the site are expected to be less than significant. b) No Impact. The Project site is not located near an existing or proposed state scenic highway and there are no scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings, or historical buildings located onsite. No impact to these resources will occur. Please see discussion above regarding City Image Corridor impacts. d) Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed Project will generate light and glare primarily from landscape lighting, safety and security lighting on building exteriors, and vehicles accessing the site. The City regulates lighting levels and does not allow lighting to spill over onto adjacent property. Further, residential lighting is generally limited, and of low intensity. All Project lighting will be required to comply with Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code, including the parking lot lighting photometric standards. More detailed review during final landscape and lighting plan review will occur during the plan check process. The City standards, combined with the nature of the land use proposed, will assure that impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 261 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 22 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X 262 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 23 e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map, July 2016; Important Farmland: 1984-2018, California Department of Conservation. There are no changes in the area and location of the proposed Project, no substantial changes in other aspects of the Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 Initial Study (MND) that would result in any new significant impacts, or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant effects related to agriculture or forest resources. As stated below, the proposed development would have no impact on agriculture resources, which was the conclusion made in the 2016 MND. In the 2016 MND, forest resources were not analyzed since they were not included in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines at the time. The subject property is located in an urban area. Consequently, impacts related to forest resources would not result in a new potentially significant environmental effect that was not identified in the 2016 MND. Setting The Project site is located in the City of La Quinta where agriculture has been an important factor in the City's history and local economy. Although most of the farms within the incorporated regions of La Quinta no longer exist, agriculture is still an economic factor east of the City. According to the California Important Farmlands mapping, the Project site is within an area of urban and built up land. The nearest designated important farmlands are Prime Farmland and Farmland of Local Importance located across the CVWD Channel, more than 1,500 feet to the south and southeast of the Project site. The City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance do not specify any permitted agricultural uses. The Low Density Agriculture/Equestrian Residential Overlay area is located miles away to the southeast of the Project site. The City’s General Plan does not include Forestry or Forest Production designations, nor does the City have zones for these uses. The Project area sits on the Coachella Valley floor, and no forestry or forest production lands occur in the desert climate. The Project site is currently vacant and designated as Medium/High Density Residential (net Project area portion) and Open Space – Natural (Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel portion) on the General Plan land use map, and the former allows a broad range of residential land uses including apartments. The Project site is zoned as Medium Density Residential for the net Project area and Floodplain for the Channel portion, where multifamily residential is permitted as a principal use. Discussion a-e) No Impact. No prime or unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance exists within the Project site or vicinity. The Project site is not located on or near any property zoned or 263 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 24 otherwise intended for agricultural uses. As such, the Project would not convert farmland to non- agricultural use and no impacts would occur to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) nor will it conflict with the Williamson Act contract. The Project site is located on the desert floor, currently zoned as Medium Density Residential and Floodplain, and surrounded by urban uses and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. The subject site does not contain forest land, timberland or timberland zoned for timberland production. Therefore, the Project would not rezone forest land or timberland as defined by the Public Resources Code and Government Code. There will be no loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 264 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 25 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? X c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? X Source: 2035 La Quinta General Plan; “Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan,” prepared by South Coast Air Quality Management District, March 2017; “Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology,” prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Revised, July 2008; “2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan,” August 1, 2003; CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2; project materials. While the current Project proposes a 40-unit multi-family apartment complex as compared to 16 single-family detached dwellings analyzed in the previous project, there are no substantial changes in the proposed Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity or previously identified impacts related to air quality. As explained below, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to the region’s air quality, which is consistent with the conclusions made in the 2016 MND. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any new potentially significant air quality impacts that were not analyzed in the 2016 MND or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified air quality effects. 265 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 26 Setting The City of La Quinta, including the Project site, is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is one of the 35 air quality regulatory agencies in the State of California and all development within the SSAB is subject to SCAQMD’s 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) and the 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (2003 CV PM10 SIP). The SCAQMD operates and maintains regional air quality monitoring stations at numerous locations throughout its jurisdiction. The Project site is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 30, (Coachella Valley) which includes monitoring stations in Palm Springs, Indio and Mecca. Criteria air pollutants are contaminants for which state and federal air quality standards (California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)) have been established. The SSAB exceeds state and federal standards for fugitive dust (PM10) and ozone (O3). Health risks associated with PM10 and ozone pollution include respiratory issues such as coughing, wheezing, asthma and even high blood pressure. Ambient air quality in the SSAB, including the proposed Project site, does not exceed state or federal standards for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxides, sulfur dioxide, lead, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, or Vinyl Chloride. In order to achieve attainment for PM10 in the region, the 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 Management Plan was adopted, which established strict standards for dust management for development proposals. The Project will contribute to an incremental increase in regional ozone and PM10 emissions. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 was used to project air quality emissions that will be generated by the proposed Project (Appendix A) and are discussed below. Discussion a) No Impact. Under CEQA, a significant air quality impact could occur if the project is not consistent with the applicable Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) or would obstruct the implementation of the policies or hinder reaching the goals of that plan. The Project site is located within the SSAB and will be subject to SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP and the 2003 CV PM10 SIP. The 2016 AQMP is a comprehensive plan that establishes control strategies and guidance on regional emission reductions for air pollutants. The AQMP is based, in part, on the land use plans of the jurisdictions in the region. The Project site is designated for Medium/High Density Residential (up to 16 DU/AC) in the General Plan, and is proposed with a multifamily apartment at around 12.4 DU/AC. The proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan designation, and is therefore compatible with the 2016 AQMP assumptions. The SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments, and cooperates actively with all State and federal government agencies. SCAG adopted the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS) to comply with the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) requirements under the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act. The Growth Management chapter of the RTP/SCS forms the basis of land use and 266 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 27 transportation controls of the AQMP. Projects that are consistent with the projections of population forecasts are considered consistent with the AQMP. The proposed Project would be implemented in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations contained in those plans in an effort to meet the applicable air quality standards, because the residential land use was included in the SCAG analysis. In conclusion, although the proposed Project would contribute to impacts to air quality, as discussed below, it would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of an applicable air quality plan because its residential characteristics were included in the development of regional plans. No impact is anticipated. b) Less than Significant Impact. A project is considered to have significant impacts if there is a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. As previously stated, the SSAB is currently a non-attainment area for PM10 and ozone. Therefore, if the project’s construction and/or operational emissions exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PM10 and ozone precursors, which include carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxides (NOx), and volatile/reactive organic compounds/gases (VOC or ROG), then impacts would be cumulatively considerable and significant. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 was used to project air quality emissions that will be generated by the proposed Project (Appendix A). Criteria air pollutants will be released during both construction and operation phases of the proposed Project, as shown in Tables 3 and 4. Table 3 summarizes short-term construction-related emissions, and Table 4 summarizes ongoing emissions generated during operation. Construction Emissions: For purposes of analysis, it is assumed that construction will occur over a 12-month period starting mid-2021 with buildout in 2022. The construction period includes all aspects of project development, including site preparation, grading, paving, building construction, and application of architectural coatings. As shown in Table 3, emissions generated by construction activities will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for any criteria pollutant during construction. The data reflect average daily unmitigated emissions over the 1-year construction period, including summer and winter weather conditions. The analysis assumes cut of 3,000 cubic yards and fill of 3,000 cubic yards of dirt/soil materials per the Project-specific preliminary grading plan. Applicable standard requirements and best management practices include, but are not limited to, the implementation of a dust control and management plan in conformance with SCAQMD Rule 403,phased application of architectural coatings and the use of low-polluting architectural paint and coatings per SCAQMD Rule 1113. Given that criteria pollutant thresholds will not be exceeded, and standard best management practices will be applied during construction, impacts will be less than significant. 267 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 28 Table 3 Maximum Daily Construction-Related Emissions Summary (pounds per day) Construction Emissions1 CO NOx ROG SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Daily Maximum 33.15 40.56 25.50 0.07 9.24 5.79 SCAQMD Thresholds 550.00 100.00 75.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Exceeds? No No No No No No 1 Average of winter and summer emissions. Standard dust control measures have been applied to the PM emissions. Emission Source: CalEEMod model, version 2016.3.2. Operational Emissions: Operational emissions are ongoing emissions that will occur over the life of the project. They include area source emissions, emissions from energy demand (electricity), and mobile source (vehicle) emissions. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (9th Edition, 2012), the proposed Project will generate approximately 293 daily trips (see Section XVII). Table 4 provides a summary of projected emissions during operation of the proposed Project at build out. As shown below, operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants for operations. Impacts related to operational emissions will be less than significant. Table 4 Maximum Daily Operational-Related Emissions Summary (pounds per day) CO NOx ROG SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Operational Emissions1 9.95 5.94 1.57 0.03 1.48 0.45 SCAQMD Thresholds 550.00 55.00 55.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Exceeds? No No No No No No 1 Average of winter and summer emissions. Emission Source: CalEEMod model, version 2016.3.2. Cumulative Contribution: Non-Attainment Criteria Pollutants A significant impact could occur if the Project would make a considerable cumulative contribution to federal or State non-attainment pollutants. The Coachella Valley portion of the SSAB is classified as a “non-attainment” area for PM10 and ozone. Cumulative air quality analysis is evaluated on a regional scale (rather than a neighborhood scale or city scale, for example) given the dispersing nature of pollutant emissions and aggregate impacts from surrounding jurisdictions and air management districts. Any development project or activity resulting in emissions of PM10, ozone, or ozone precursors will contribute, to some degree, to regional non-attainment designations of ozone and PM10. The SCAQMD does not currently recommend quantified analyses of construction and/or operational emissions from multiple development projects, nor does it provide methodologies or thresholds of significance to be used to assess the significance of cumulative emissions generated by multiple cumulative projects. However, it is recommended that a project’s potential 268 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 29 contribution to cumulative impacts should be assessed utilizing the same significance criteria as those for project-specific impacts. Furthermore, SCAQMD states that if an individual development project generates less than significant construction or operational emissions, then the development project would not generate a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment. As shown in the tables above, Project-related PM10, CO, NOx, and ROG emissions are projected to be well below established SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, the proposed Project will result in incremental, but not cumulatively considerable impacts on regional PM10 or ozone levels. Summary: As shown above, both construction and operation of the proposed Project will result in criteria emissions below the SCAQMD significance thresholds, and neither would violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Overall, impacts related to construction and operation will be less than significant and are not cumulatively considerable from a non-attainment standpoint. c) Less than Significant Impact. The nearest sensitive receptors are residents in the 28 Westward Isle homes located to the east of the Project site. To determine if the proposed Project has the potential to generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts, the mass rate Localized Significance Threshold (LST) Look-Up Table was used. Based on the Project’s size and proximity to existing housing, the 5-acre site tables at a distance of 25 meters were used to provide a conservative air quality analysis. Table 5 shows on-site emission concentrations during Project construction will not exceed LST thresholds. Because the proposed land uses do not include major stationary polluters (such as a landfill, chemical plant, oil field, refineries etc.), LST analysis was not required or conducted for Project operation. Overall, the impacts will be less than significant. Table 5 Localized Significance Thresholds Emissions (pounds per day) Construction CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 Maximum Emissions1 33.15 40.56 9.24 5.79 LST Threshold 2,292 304 14 8 Exceed? No No No No Emission Source: CalEEMod model, version 2016.3.2. LST Threshold Source: LST Mass Rate Look-up Table, revised October 21, 2009, SCAQMD. 1 Operational emissions that affect sensitive receptors are limited to on-site area emissions. Energy and mobile emissions occur off-site. Health Impacts As shown in Tables 3 and 4, construction and operation of the proposed Project will result in criteria emissions that are below the SCAQMD significance thresholds, and neither would violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. 269 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 30 With current technology, it is not scientifically possible to calculate the degree to which exposure to various levels of criteria pollutant emissions will impact individual health. There are several factors that make predicting a Project-specific numerical impact difficult: • Not all individuals will be affected equally due to medical history. Some may have medical pre-dispositions, and diet and exercise levels tend to vary across a population. • Due to the dispersing nature of pollutants it is difficult to locate and identify which group of individuals will be impacted, either directly or indirectly. • There are currently no approved methodologies or studies to base assumptions on, such as baseline health levels or emission level-to-health risk ratios. Due to the limitations described above, the extent to which the Project poses a health risk is uncertain but unavoidable. It is anticipated that overall impacts associated with all criteria pollutants will be less than significant, and that health effects will also be less than significant. d) Less than Significant Impact. The occurrence and severity of odor impacts depend on numerous factors, including the nature, frequency, and intensity of the source; wind speed and direction; and the sensitivity of the receptors. While offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they can be very unpleasant, leading to distress among the public and often generating citizen complaints to local governments and regulatory agencies. The SCAQMD identifies certain land uses as sources of odors. These land uses include agriculture (farming and livestock), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting facilities, refineries, landfills, transfer stations, and fiberglass molding. The proposed Project will be developed with residential land uses and is not expected to generate objectionable odors during any phase of construction or at Project buildout. Short-term odors associated with paving and construction activities could be generated; however, any such odors would be quickly dispersed below detectable levels as distance from the construction site increases. At buildout, residential units will generate typical odors from cooking and other household activities, but will not generate objectionable odors. Therefore, impacts from objectionable odors are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 270 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 31 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Coachella Valley MSHCP; La Quinta Municipal Code; aerial maps; and Project materials. 271 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 32 There are no changes in the area and location of the proposed Project, no substantial changes in other aspects of the Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts related to biological resources. As explained below, the proposed Project would have less than significant impacts to biological resources with mitigation, which is consistent with the findings of the 2016 MND. The proposed Project would not result in any new potentially significant biological impacts that were not identified for the previous project or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant biological resources impacts. Setting The Coachella Valley is located within the Sonoran Desert, a subdivision of the Colorado Desert. The Sonoran Desert hosts a wide range of biological resources that are highly specialized and endemic to the region. The proposed Project is within the boundaries of and subject to the provisions of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP).1 The CVMSHCP is a comprehensive regional plan that balances growth in the Coachella Valley with the requirements of federal and State endangered species laws. The Project site is not located within or adjacent to a CVMSHCP Conservation Area. The subject property is currently vacant, and has been previously disturbed during development of the original homes and golf course in the 1970s, demolition of those uses, and subsequent activities associated with development of the existing Jefferson Street bridge project. It is not located in an area identified as having potential habitat for any sensitive species. Other than a few tree stands, no significant native vegetation or habitat features are located onsite. Significant landscape vegetation is limited to existing desert-scape plantings in a 40-foot wide landscape parkway along the Jefferson Street project frontage. The site is located outside of habitat areas where special status species have been documented and areas where species-specific studies are required. Discussion a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project is located in an urban setting and surrounded by roadways and existing development on three sides and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel on the south. The proposed Project will result in redevelopment of the subject property, which is currently barren of any substantial vegetation, and the addition of new landscaping materials. No development will occur on the Channel portion of the Project site. Given the previous disturbed nature of the site, the current conditions and existing urbanized development in its immediate surroundings, the Project is not expected to result in direct or indirect impacts that would adversely affect a special status biological species. b) No Impact. The subject property does not contain any riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities protected by local plans, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The property is surrounded by urban development, as well as the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel on the south boundary. The subject property will have a new 6’ fence 1 Recirculated Final Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; Figure 8-3. 272 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 33 to match existing fencing on the southerly property line and a new 6’ wall at the southwest corner. The remainder of the Project site outside the fence/wall located within the Channel is not part of the Project and will not be subject to development. Onsite soils have been disturbed by previous development and demolishment, and the site is essentially barren of any native vegetation. No Project-related impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required. c) No Impact. The Project site is located inland and does not contain any streams, marshes, protected wetlands, or vernal pools protected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. New 6’ fence/wall will be installed on the southerly property line between the subject property and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. The Project will include a primary infiltration basin and a secondary basin to treat and drain the design volume as required by the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP, see Section X). When the basin volume is exceeded, the storm water will drain to a 21-feet wide catch basin in Jefferson Street, which is then piped to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. According to CVWD, retention of the 100-yr storm on-site is not required, and the Project will be allowed to discharge storm water into the channel. No untreated or unmanaged Project-related runoff will enter the channel. The subject property is located in a developed and highly disturbed area and there are no riparian habitats or wetlands located on the site. The proposed Project will have no impact on riparian species or habitat, wetlands or other sensitive natural communities, including marshes or vernal pools, or through direct removal, filling, or hydrological interruption of a natural drainage. No mitigation measures would be required. d) Less than Significant with Mitigation. The subject property is surrounded by roadways and existing development on three sides and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel on the south. Given the site conditions, primarily urban setting and distance to the mountains, the subject property would have minimal potential to serve as a wildlife movement corridor for any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or as a native wildlife nursery site. The site may offer limited nesting sites for birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). To comply with the MBTA, any vegetation or tree removal, or other ground disturbing activities occurring between January 1 and August 31 with the potential to impact nesting birds shall require a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey to determine if there is a potential impact to such species. Conducting construction activities outside of the breeding season (September 1 to March 1) can avoid having to implement such measures. If active nests of any native bird are found onsite, they will be avoided until after the young have fledged. Compliance with the MBTA will ensure impacts to sensitive species are reduced to less than significant levels. All projects are required under the General Plan (Policy BIO-1.4) to comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), and will be required to determine if active bird nesting is occurring if vegetation removal will take place between January and September. e) No Impact. The proposed Project will not conflict with any local ordinances protecting biological species and will be required to comply with the landscaping and other appropriate requirements of the Municipal Code. The proposed Project would also adhere to the City’s General Plan Policy BIO-1.6 by incorporating native desert plant materials into the Project landscape. No impact is anticipated. 273 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 34 f) No Impact. The City of La Quinta has adopted the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). As a result, the City is required to implement a Local Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) for projects located within the CVMSHCP plan area. Although the proposed Project site is not within a designated conservation area as defined in the Plan, it is located with the general Plan boundaries, and the developer will be required to pay LDMF. These fees are designed to offset potential impacts of cumulative projects on covered biological species, and assure that impacts are reduced throughout the Valley and City to less than significant levels. The Project will not conflict with any policies or ordinances that protect biological species, or any habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans. Mitigation Measures: 1. To comply with the MBTA, any vegetation or tree removal, or other ground disturbing activities occurring between January 1st and August 31st with the potential to impact nesting birds shall require a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey to determine if there is a potential impact to such species. All vegetation and suitable nesting habitat (including open ground) on the Project site, whether or not it will be removed or disturbed, shall be surveyed for nesting birds. If no nests are present, this condition will be cleared. Conducting construction activities outside the breeding season (September 1st through December 31st) can avoid having to implement these measures. If active nests of any native bird are found on site, they will be avoided until after the young have fledged. Monitoring: A. The City’s Planning Division shall assure that necessary nesting bird surveys are completed in compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and applicable protocol. Responsible Party: City Planning Division 274 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 35 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? X c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey – Indian Springs Villas Project, prepared by CRM Tech, December 2015; Cultural Resources Sensitivity Review, Indian Springs Villas Project, prepared by CRM Tech, June 2015; Project materials; Email communication with Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, dated 6/22/20; Email communication with Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation, dated 4/27/20; Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, letters dated 10/27/15, 2/3/16 & 7/15/20. There are no changes in the area and location of the proposed Project, no substantial changes in other aspects of the Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts of substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts related to cultural resources. As explained below, the proposed Project would have less than significant impacts to the City’s cultural resources with the implementation of Mitigation Measure V-1. This is consistent with the 2016 MND. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any new potentially significant cultural resources effects that were not identified in the 2016 MND or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant cultural resources impacts. Setting Native Americans, the Cahuilla, occupied lands throughout the Coachella Valley approximately 8,000 to 12,000 years ago. The Cahuilla Indians were a Takic-speaking people consisting of hunters and gatherers. Among this tribe were separate groups including the Pass Cahuilla, who occupied the modern day San Gorgonio Pass and Palm Springs area, the Mountain Cahuilla, who occupied the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains, and the Desert Cahuilla, who occupied the eastern Coachella Valley, which includes modern day La Quinta. The Coachella Valley saw the first noted European explorations in the 1820’s. By the 1870’s non-native settlements began to occur across the Coachella Valley, as new federal laws opened lands for new settlers. The discovery of underground water sources began to increase farming activities throughout the Valley in the early 20th century. Tourism reached La Quinta and the Coachella Valley in the 1920’s. The La Quinta Resort was developed in 1926 and became a focus of the local economy. 275 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 36 The City of La Quinta conducted two city-wide Historical Resources Surveys, which occurred in 1996–1997 and 2006; these two studies were updated in 2010 as part of the General Plan Update. Discussion a,b) Less than Significant with Mitigation. A cultural resource survey was prepared for the previous project by CRM Tech in 2015. The project proponent originally prepared a resource records literature search in June 2015, which was sent to the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) for review under AB 52 requirements. The records search determined that the site was not previously surveyed. However, nearly 100 prior studies have historically been conducted within one mile of the subject property. These studies identified large concentrations of recorded prehistoric sites in the Project area, some of which are considered highly significant. Based on the records search, the City’s Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) recommended inclusion of the record search recommendations in August 2015. Subsequent to this, ACBCI reviewed the records search report and requested the field survey. The referenced field survey was prepared in December 2015 and provided by the applicant. Based on the site assessment including both records searches of available maps and reports, and a field investigation, CRM Tech concluded that the previous project will not cause a substantial adverse change to any known historic resource, and no further cultural resource investigation is necessary. However, the survey states that due to the area’s sensitivity for cultural resources as identified in the record search, there is potential for subsurface resources to be unearthed during construction, and recommends that an archaeological monitoring program, as identified in the records search review, be implemented. ACBCI also requested the presence of an approved Native American Cultural Resource Monitor during any ground disturbing activities as part of the previous project’s AB 52 consultation. Since the proposed Project is located on the same site and would disturb the same area as the previous project, impacts to historical and archaeological resources are not expected to change and will remain less than significant with mitigation as described below. Native American Consultation The City initiated Tribal Consultation in conformance with AB 52 requirements and contacted the twelve tribes recommended by the State Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in writing in April 2020. As of September, three tribes have responded, including the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians and Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation that indicated no presence of Native American resources on the Project site and no comment on the Project, respectively. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians requested consultation and copies of cultural resource documentation. The ACBCI was provided with the field survey report for the Project site (CRM 2015) and initial study for the previously proposed project on July 31, 2020. ACBCI stated in their response that the letter does not conclude consultation, and that upon receipt of requested materials the ACBCI THPO may have additional recommendations or require further mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 includes an ACBCI Tribal Monitor be present during earth moving activities in anticipation of a future request. Once the City receives further response from ACBCI and other tribes, any 276 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 37 requests and input from consultation will be included in conditions of approval and/or added to this Subsequent Initial Study. This process is described in Section XVIII, Tribal Cultural Resources. c) No Impact. It is not anticipated that any human remains will be encountered during construction of the proposed Project because the subject property and surrounding area have been previously disturbed due to development and demolishing activities. However, should any previously unidentified or unanticipated human remains be discovered during Project construction, state law requires that all activity stop, that the coroner be notified to determine the nature of the remains and whether Native American consultation is needed. This law requirement assures that there will be no impact to cemeteries or human remains. Mitigation Measures: 1. Earth-moving activities including grading, grubbing, trenching, or excavations at the site shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and an Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Native American monitor. If any cultural materials more than 50 years of age are discovered, they shall be recorded and evaluated in the field. The monitors shall be prepared to recover artifacts quickly to avoid construction delays but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for controlled archaeological recovery if a substantial cultural deposit is encountered. The monitors shall determine when excavations have reached sufficient depth to preclude the occurrence of cultural resources, and when monitoring should conclude. If artifacts are discovered, these shall be processed, catalogued, analyzed, and prepared for permanent curation in a repository with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for additional research in the future. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: A. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the site, the applicant shall provide a fully executed monitoring agreement to the City. Responsible Parties: Project applicant, Planning Division, City Engineer. B. Within 30 days of the completion of ground disturbing activities on the Project site, a report of findings shall be filed with the City. The report will summarize the methods and results of the monitoring program, including an itemized inventory and a detailed analysis of recovered artifacts, upon completion of the field and laboratory work. The report should include an interpretation of the cultural activities represented by the artifacts and a discussion of the significance of all archaeological finds. Responsible Parties: Project applicant, Project archaeologist, Tribal monitor, Planning Division, City Engineer. 277 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 38 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact VI. ENERGY -- Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? X b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? X Source: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Project materials; La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (2013). Energy was not analyzed in the 2016 MND. However, the Project is expected to have a less than significant impact on energy consumption and efficiency, as explained below. Setting Nuclear energy, fossil fuels (e.g. oil, coal and natural gas) and renewable sources (e.g. wind, solar, geothermal and hydropower) are various sources of energy. The electrical energy to the City is provided by Imperial Irrigation District (IID). IID has existing facilities underground in the Project vicinity including Jefferson Street rights-of-way. Natural gas to the City is provided by the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). SoCalGas has existing underground pipelines in the Project vicinity including Jefferson Street rights-of-way. Discussion a, b) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will utilize energy resources during both construction and operational activities. Construction related energy demand comes from the operation of construction equipment and the manufacturing of construction materials. Operational energy demand primarily comes from building/site lighting, HVAC systems, and use of electricity and natural gas for residential activities such as kitchens and swimming pools. All apartment buildings will be constructed in accordance with the Building Code, California Green Building Code, and Energy Code in effect at the time that development occurs, to ensure the most efficient construction/building technologies are used, which will benefit overall building operations, ensure energy efficiency, and reduce wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy resources. These requirements of law assure that future buildings on the site will not waste energy. As of 2017, IID sourced 28.5% of its retail electricity from renewable sources and anticipated an increase to 48.8% from renewable sources for 2019. The City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan promotes local generation of renewable energy. The Project will comply with the solar and zero 278 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 39 net energy requirements in the 2019 California Building Code and will not interfere with any state or local plan that promotes renewable energy or energy efficiency. Adherence to the applicable state standards enforced by IID and SoCalGas will ensure the development is consistent with current energy standards and conservation goals laid out in the City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (2013). Therefore, impacts related to energy will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None required 279 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 40 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? X ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? X f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Project materials; “Geotechnical Investigation: Proposed Residential Subdivision Tentative Tract Map No. 36875 SEC Jefferson Street and Palm Circle Drive La Quinta, California” Sladden Engineering, February 2015. 280 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 41 There are no changes in the area and location of the proposed Project, no substantial changes in other aspects of the Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts of substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts related to geology and soils. As explained below, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact or no impact to geology and soils, which is consistent with the 2016 MND. For this reason, the proposed Project would not result in any new potentially significant geology impacts that were not identified in the 2016 MND or substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant geology and soils impacts. Setting The proposed Project site was previously developed and all previous structures demolished. The site is underlain by windblown (Aeolian) sand deposits as well as alluvial soil eroded from the nearby mountains and deposited in the site vicinity. The San Andreas Fault zone is the major fault in the Coachella Valley. Breaks associated with the Fault cover a generally northwest-southeast trending zone approximately 10 miles wide, north and east of the Project site. The onsite geologic conditions are unchanged. For this reason, the conclusions in the 2016 IS/MND that the previously proposed project would have no impact on geology and soils also apply to the currently proposed Project. Discussion a) i.) No Impact. The San Andreas Fault System is located approximately 4.26 miles northeast of the Project site. The subject property is not located within a currently delineated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, and no known faults are mapped in the immediate vicinity of the site, nor were signs of any active surface faulting observed on the site. The 2015 Geotechnical Investigation for the previous project concluded that risks associated with surface ground rupture is low on the Project site. ii.) Less than Significant Impact. The site is located in a seismically active region and will likely experience strong seismic shaking during the design life of the Project. The closest active fault to the subject property is the San Andreas Fault, approximately 4.26 miles northeast of the site. The property is likely to experience moderate to severe ground shaking from earthquakes originating on this and/or other local and regional faults. Earthquake-resistant construction methods prescribed by the Building Code will be implemented to minimize potential structural damage. At a minimum, seismic design will be required to comply with the most recent version of the California Building Code (CBC). Therefore, the impacts associated with seismic ground motion are expected to be less than significant. iii.) Less than Significant Impact. The 2015 Geotechnical Investigation indicates that the Project site and its vicinity are subject to moderate liquefaction potential. Based on groundwater mapping and the preparer’s knowledge of the Project vicinity, risk associated with liquefaction and its related hazards are considered negligible. While the surface soils consist of 281 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 42 artificial fill to 3-4 feet in depth, underlying native materials consist of sandy silt, characterized by fine-grained granular sediments that are normally susceptible to liquefaction; however, borings were taken up to 51.5 feet and no groundwater was encountered. The site is located in an area that is susceptible to high levels of ground shaking and may result in localized impacts related to liquefaction around saturated foundations or other load-carrying structures. Results from the investigation indicate that the site is somewhat susceptible to seismically induced settlement, with settlement expected to be less than one inch, which should not be a factor in design of the Project. The City will require a final geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of building plans for the site, to assure that any required remedial soil stabilization is implemented as part of the building permit process. The Project is required to conform with the City Zoning and the Uniform Building Code Standards at the time of construction, thus further reducing impacts related to seismically induced liquefaction. These City standards will assure that impacts associated with seismic hazards are reduced to less than significant levels. iv.) No Impact. The subject property is generally level with no rock formations on or surrounding it. It is approximately 1.5 miles east of the nearest slopes of the Santa Rosa/Coral Reef Mountains. It is not susceptible to slope instability, including landslides, rock falls, or soil slumps. There is no potential for landslide hazards on the Project site. b) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is generally flat, thus minimizing the potential for water erosion. The subject property is located in an area with a high to very high wind erosion, and some erosion could occur during Project construction. A dust management plan will be part of the standard requirements imposed through conditions of approval to minimize fugitive dust generated during the building process (Chapter 6.16, LQMC). The site will be covered by buildings, pavement or landscaping at build out, minimizing long-term wind erosion potential. Grading and construction may require removal of the topsoil; however, they would occur in accordance with erosion control requirements imposed by the City pursuant to grading permit regulations. The standard approval requirements will ensure that the Project does not cause excessive soil erosion. In addition, as part of the Project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP, see Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality), Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be implemented during grading and construction to reduce sedimentation and soil erosion to the maximum extent practicable. Overall, the Project is not expected to result in significant soil erosion or loss of topsoil. c) Less than Significant Impact. Landslide See response to VII.a.iv, above. Lateral Spreading Lateral spreading is often associated with liquefaction when soils move laterally during seismic shaking. As discussed in subsection a.iii above, risk associated with liquefaction and its related hazards in the Project vicinity are considered negligible. Due to the relatively flat site topography, there is low likelihood of lateral spreading onsite. 282 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 43 Subsidence According to the 2015 Geotechnical Investigation, the Project site is situated within an "Active" subsidence zone. The Coachella Valley Water District has acknowledged regional subsidence throughout the southern portion of the Coachella Valley and has committed to groundwater replenishment programs that are intended to limit future subsidence. At this time, subsidence is considered a regional problem requiring regional mitigation not specific to the Project vicinity. Furthermore, the District’s continued efforts to recharge the aquifer have resulted in the elimination of overdraft in the basin, thereby reducing the potential for subsidence. No fissures or other surficial evidence of subsidence were observed at or near the subject property. There has been no evidence of subsidence on or in the vicinity of the site. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the proposed Project will be impacted by subsidence. Liquefaction See response to VII.a.iii, above. Collapse See response to VII.a.iii, above. d) Less than Significant Impact. The subject property is generally underlain by Quaternary-age sand deposits (Qs), which have a low shrink/swell potential. The proposed Project will not create substantial risks to life or property associated with expansive soils, as the near surface soils on site are non-expansive and fall within the “very low” expansion category in accordance with CBC classification criteria. e) No Impact. The proposed Project will connect to existing sewer lines, and no alternative wastewater disposal systems are proposed or required. The Project site is within the service area of the Coachella Valley Water District, and all facilities will be required to connect to existing sanitary sewer services. f) Less than Significant Impact. A paleontological resource report was not prepared for either the previous and the currently proposed projects. The site is not in an area identified as having a high sensitivity for such resources (Undetermined – Dune sand) in the General Plan (Figure III-5). In addition, activity associated with demolition of previous structures, combined with construction of the Jefferson Street bridge, indicate that any potential for paleontological resources would be too negligible to warrant further study. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 283 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 44 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS -- Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; CalEEMod 2016.3.2; Project materials. While the current Project proposes a 40-unit multi-family apartment as compared to 16 single- family detached dwellings in the previous project, there are no substantial changes in the proposed Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity or previously identified impacts related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. As explained below, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to the region’s GHG emissions, which is consistent with the conclusions made in the 2016 MND. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any new potentially significant GHG impacts that were not analyzed in the 2016 MND or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified effects. Setting Certain gases in the earth’s atmosphere, classified as greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role in determining the earth’s surface temperature. Prominent GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and fluorinated compounds. Sources of GHGs include both natural and anthropogenic (human-caused) processes. Anthropogenic emissions of these GHGs in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for intensifying the greenhouse effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the earth’s climate, known as global climate change or global warming. State laws, such as Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) and Senate Bill 32 (SB 32), require all cities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. SB 32 is the extension of AB 32 which requires the state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. To protect air quality locally and contribute to the State mandate to reduce air quality emissions, the City of La Quinta has adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (2013) that is consistent with the goals of AB 32 and S-3-05, which calls for a statewide GHG emission reduction to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. 284 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 45 GHG Thresholds On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD formally adopted a greenhouse gas significance threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr that only applies to industrial uses’ stationary sources where SCAQMD is the lead agency (SCAQMD Resolution No.08-35). This threshold was adopted based upon an October 2008 staff report and draft interim guidance document that also recommended a threshold for all projects using a tiered approach. It was recommended by SCAQMD staff that a project’s greenhouse gas emissions would be considered significant if it could not comply with at least one of the following “tiered” tests: • Tier 1: Is there an applicable exemption? • Tier 2: Is the project compliant with a greenhouse gas reduction plan that is, at a minimum, consistent with the goals of AB 32? • Tier 3: Is the project below an absolute threshold (10,000 MTCO2e/year for industrial projects; 3,000 MTCO2e/year for residential and commercial projects)? • Tier 4: Is the project below a (yet to be set) performance threshold? • Tier 5: Would the project achieve a screening level with off-site mitigation? Discussion a, b) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will generate GHG emissions during both construction and operation. As described above in Section III, Air Quality, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 was used to quantify air quality emission projections, including greenhouse gas emissions (Appendix A). Construction Construction activities will result in short-term GHG emissions associated with operation of construction equipment, employee commute, material hauling, and other ground disturbing activities. As shown in Table 6, the Project will generate 383.18 CO2e metric tons during the 1- year construction period. There are currently no construction related GHG emission thresholds for projects of this nature. To determine if construction emissions will result in a cumulative considerable impact, buildout GHG emissions were amortized over a 30-year period and added to annual operational emissions to be compared to applicable GHG thresholds (see Table 6, below). Operation At buildout, there are five emission source categories that will be contributing either directly or indirectly to operational GHG emissions, including energy/electricity usage, water usage, solid waste disposal, area emissions (pavement and architectural coating off-gassing), and mobile sources. The proposed Project is a residential development and consistent with the Tier 3 SCAQMD’s residential thresholds of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr. Table 6 provides a summary of the projected short-term construction and annual operational GHG generation associated with buildout of the proposed Project. 285 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 46 Table 6 Projected GHG Emissions Summary (Metric Tons) Phase CO2e (MT/YR) Construction (2021-2022) Construction Total 383.18 Operation Construction: 30 year amortized 1 12.77 Annual Operation 598.60 Total Operation 611.37 SCAQMD Threshold (Mixed-Use) 3,000.00 1. Buildout construction GHG emissions were amortized over 30 years then added to buildout operational GHG emissions. 383.18/30 = 12.77 As shown in the table, above, the Project complies with the Tier 3 threshold because emissions will not exceed the 3,000 MT/yr threshold. Therefore, Project impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 286 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 47 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? X f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; CA Department of Toxic Substances; Project materials. 287 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 48 There are no changes in the area and location of the proposed Project, no substantial changes in other aspects of the Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. As explained below, none of the proposed Project’s construction or operating activities would result in significant impacts associated with hazards or hazardous materials. Consequently, the proposed Project would not result in any new potentially significant hazardous impacts that were not identified in the 2016 MND or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant hazardous materials impacts. Setting The subject property is surrounded by residential development, a dermatology and cosmetic surgery center, Jefferson Street and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. The site was previously developed with several residences and a portion of the golf course from the early 1970’s. The homes were subsequently purchased by the City and demolished to allow construction of the Jefferson Street bridge in 2006. No chemical or hazardous waste disposal has been documented on the site. There are no known underground tanks or buried materials on the Project site. Proposed development would bring commonly used but potentially hazardous materials, including chlorine for the swimming pool and chemicals typical of residential developments to the Project site as part of the daily operation of the Project. Discussion a, b) Less than Significant Impact. The development of the site is likely to result in the storage of cleaning materials for household use, pool maintenance, etc. None of these chemicals will be used in sufficient quantities to pose a threat to humans or cause a foreseeable chemical release into the environment. The construction phase would involve the use of heavy equipment, which uses small amounts of oil and fuels and other potential flammable substances. During construction, equipment would require refueling and minor maintenance on site that could lead to fuel and oil spills. The contractor will be required to identify a staging area for storing materials and will be subject to State law regarding the handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials during construction. There are no identified hazardous materials sites within the Project area. The proposed Project would not result in a significant risk of explosion or accidental release of hazardous substances, because the cleaners and household chemicals used are not explosive and will not be stored in large quantities. The use and handling of hazardous materials during construction activities and long-term operation of the proposed Project would occur in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws including California Occupational Health and Safety Administration (CalOSHA) requirements. Impacts would be less than significant. 288 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 49 c) No Impact. The nearest schools to the proposed Project are Amelia Earhart Elementary and John Glenn Middle Schools (approximately ½ mile northwest), and La Quinta High School (approximately ½ mile west). The proposed Project will result in the development of a residential community, which is a similar land use to uses immediately adjacent to these schools and is not expected to emit any hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste to jeopardize schools. No impact would occur. d) No Impact. The Project site is not located on or near a hazardous materials site as identified by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. It will not create a significant hazard to the public or environment. e) No Impact. The Project site is located approximately 2.25 miles south of the Bermuda Dunes Airport and 7.25 miles northwest of the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport. It is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of a public or private airport, and located well outside the operational and navigational hazard area. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working at the Project site. f) No Impact. The proposed Project will not physically interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans. Access to and from the site will be provided at an access point on the existing street grid (Jefferson Street). The access driveway is proposed with a minimum width of 28.0 feet with standard City of La Quinta curb returns with a 35.0 feet radius. The Project will be required to comply with police and fire department regulations to assure adequate emergency access and vehicle turn-around space. No impacts are expected. g) No Impact. The subject property and immediate Project vicinity encompass developed residential/commercial areas that are approximately 4 miles from the nearest wildlands (Santa Rosa Mountains). According to CalFire fire hazard mapping, the subject property is not located within a fire hazard severity zone. The proposed Project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk associated with wildfire hazards. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 289 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 50 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? X b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: (i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; X (ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; X (iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or X (iv) impede or redirect flood flows? X (d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? X (e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Jefferson Street Apartments Site Development Permit No. 2020-0001 Hydrology January 30, 2020, and Project Specific Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan April 23, 2020, both prepared by Watson Engineering. 290 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 51 The proposed Project is a multi-family apartment development, whereas the previously proposed project consisted of single-family development; however, the Project will follow the same concept for onsite drainage , and will be subject to the same regulations as the previous project. There are no substantial changes in the proposed Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts related to hydrology or water quality. As explained below, the proposed Project would have less than significant to no impacts on hydrology and water quality, which is consistent with the 2016 MND (some questions have changed in CEQA guidelines since 2016). Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any new potentially significant hydrologic resources or water quality impacts that were not identified in the 2016 MND or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant hydrologic resources or water quality. Setting Domestic Water The Project site is located within the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) service area for domestic water. The District’s primary water source is groundwater extracted through a system of wells located throughout the City and region. In addition to groundwater, CVWD relies on imported water brought to the region by regional canals, which is stored or recharged into the aquifer at basins in the west end of the Valley (Whitewater River, northwest of Palm Springs); in the southeastern section of the City (Dike 4); and in Martinez Canyon, south and east of the City. CVWD also owns and operates the water distribution system, which is generally located under existing streets in the public right‐of-way. The District also maintains water storage tanks throughout its service area, including ten existing or planned tanks in the City and its Sphere, with capacities ranging from 250,000 to 10 million gallons. CVWD is responsible, under the California Water Code, for analyzing its current and future water supply, and assuring that sufficient supply is available to serve land uses within the District, through the preparation of an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). CVWD is required to periodically update the Plan. The Project will require installation of onsite water pipelines that connect to existing water infrastructure. The proposed Project will result in a multi-family residential development with 40 units on approximately 3.22 acres in the City of La Quinta. State Water Code Section 10910(a) states that any city or county that determines that a “Project,” as defined in Water Code Section 10912, shall prepare a water supply assessment. The threshold defined by the Water Code is 500 dwelling units, 500,000 square feet of commercial development, or a combination thereof resulting in the equivalent of 500 dwelling units. The proposed Project does not meet the threshold of 500 dwelling units; therefore, a water supply assessment is not required. Wastewater Treatment Provider and Sewer System The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) also provides sewer service to the Project area and the City of La Quinta. The Project site is located in an urban area where the main sewer lines were laid out under the main roads and streets. The Project will extend sewer lines from existing 18” sewer mains in Jefferson Street throughout the Project site. 291 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 52 CVWD has two wastewater treatment plants serving the City, Water Reclamation Plant 7 (WRP- 7) located at Madison Street and Avenue 38 and the Mid-Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP- 4). For all land in the City and Sphere located south of Miles Avenue, sewage is treated at the WRP-4 located in Thermal, which has a capacity of 9.9 million gallons per day. There is currently excess capacity at WRP-4. WRP-4 does not include tertiary treatment facilities; however, plans are underway to extend the tertiary-treated water delivery system to other areas in the valley. CVWD also implements the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board pertaining to domestic water quality and wastewater discharge. Flood Control The Project site is located in the Coachella Valley where rainfall on the valley floor, including the Project area, averages 3 inches annually. Several watersheds drain the adjoining elevated terrain of the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains towards the valley floor. Regional stormwater flows within the Project area are conveyed by the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. The Project site is relatively level and is surrounded by urban development and the partially fenced Channel; there are no or limited tributary flows to and from the site. The Project area is subject to City requirements relating to flood control. The City implements standard requirements for the retention of storm flows and participates in the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to protect surface waters from pollution. The Project will include a primary infiltration basin and a secondary basin to treat and drain the design volume as required by the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). When the basin volume is exceeded, the storm water will drain to a 21-foot wide catch basin in Jefferson Street, which is piped to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. According to CVWD, retention of the 100-year storm on- site is not required, and the Project will be allowed to discharge storm water into the Channel. Discussion a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Like the previously proposed project, the Project proponent will be required to implement National Pollution Elimination System (NPDES) requirements for storm flows by preparing and implementing a SWPPP and WQMP. Project development will be connected to existing area sewer lines. Additionally, the applicant entered into a purchase and sale agreement with the city in November 2014 (AGR2014-0023; Resolution 2014-058), to purchase the remaining properties that housed the demolished homes. A condition of the agreement requires applicant to provide sewer connection for the existing Westward Isle condominiums, directly east of the project. Wastewater will be transported to and processed at CVWD’s Mid-Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4) in Thermal. CVWD implements all the wastewater discharge requirements and water quality standards of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 292 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 53 The City requires that all projects retain the 100-year storm on site; however, CVWD has provided written acceptance of the previous project’s storm discharge, with conditions. As a result, 100- year storm retention was not required of the previous project. The proposed Project will comply with the conditions by using retention facilities to manage storm flows via drainage into two infiltration basins, which are designed to accept the BMP treatment volume and will include a Maxwell drywell. When that volume is exceeded, excess flow will flow into Jefferson Street and discharge into the existing catch basin adjacent to the Project site that discharges directly to the channel. The design of these facilities must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the initiation of Project construction. All hydrology improvements will also be required to comply with NPDES standards, to assure that no polluted storm water enters other surface waters either during construction or operation of the Project. The Project will implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address the management of pollutants of concern that may be generated onsite, as identified by the WQMP. A routine BMP maintenance program will be established to assure ongoing implementation. Impacts associated with water quality are expected to be less than significant. Therefore, the proposed Project will have less than significant impacts on water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. b) Less than Significant Impact. Domestic water will be supplied to the subject property by CVWD through existing water infrastructure. CVWD has prepared an Urban Water Management Plan 2015 Update, which is a long-term planning document that helps CVWD plan for current and future water demands. The Plan demonstrates that CVWD has available, or can supply in the future, sufficient and reliable water supplies to serve future development in the Project area. Water will be necessary for the proposed Project during both construction and operational phases. Onsite water will be required during site grading as part of the dust mitigation program. At buildout, the Project will require water for use in apartment buildings, the swimming pool, and irrigation of landscaping. The Project proposes to use drought-tolerant planting materials, with limited turf to be used for the common area. The residential units will be equipped with water efficient fixtures in compliance with Building Code requirements to minimize water consumption. The proposed Project is consistent with the City’s 2035 General Plan and is therefore addressed in the UWMP. The 2015 UWMP demonstrates that CVWD has available, or can supply, sufficient water to serve the proposed Project. Impacts on groundwater supplies and recharge are expected to be less than significant. c) i-iii) Less than Significant Impact. The current Project proposes similar stormwater management improvements and similar building coverage as the previous project. Therefore, impacts to stormwater management are expected to be similar to those previously analyzed. Existing runoff flows to two retention basins on the property, one at the project entry, and a smaller secondary basin south of the project entry. The subject property does not contain any streams or rivers, though it does border the CVWD channel. 293 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 54 The Project will result in addition of impermeable hardscape onsite, which will increase surface runoff and somewhat alter the local drainage pattern, based on the design of the Project. The proposed Project will not significantly change drainage patterns onsite or in the surrounding area. Watson Engineering prepared a Hydrology Report that analyzed Project buildout. The site will be graded to direct drainage as surface flow around the buildings and parking areas toward the two proposed basins that are designed to accept the BMP treatment volume. When that volume is exceeded, excess flow will flow into Jefferson Street and discharge into the existing catch basin adjacent to the Project site that discharges directly to the channel. The Project Hydrology Report concluded that the proposed basin has the capacity to accept and discharge the drainage into the CVWD channel. Project design will comply with the conditions of CVWD approval for discharge and relevant standard requirements, which will assure that impacts associated with storm water retention remain less than significant. To reduce discharge of pollutants into stormwater runoff from the site, the proposed Project must implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) included in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and both need to be approved by the City Engineer, as required by the City’s NPDES implementation agreement. Implementation of BMPs will reduce pollutants of concern that may enter receiving retention basins and help reduce short and long-term water quality impacts caused by the construction and operation of the proposed Project. The Project’s pollutants of concern include pathogens. Due to the on-site retention/infiltration basin designed for the BMP volume and the proposed drywell system, the Project will not have activities that contribute to receiving water impairment. Approval of the WQMP, SWPPP, and the required BMPs will reduce impacts to surface waters by reducing siltation and eliminating pollutants in storm flows. With the implementation of this standard requirement, the impacts associated with surface water pollution will be less than significant. Adherence to City requirements, including WQMP BMPs, will ensure the Project site design will not result in erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Implementation of these and other applicable requirements will assure that the Project will not create or contribute water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. iv) Less than Significant Impact. The subject property is designated Zone X on FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Maps, which is defined as moderate and low risk areas, including areas of 500-year flood, areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood. Implementation of the proposed onsite drainage retention facilities will further ensure that the Project will have less than significant impact on impeding or redirecting flood flows. d) No Impact. The Project site is not in the vicinity of a levee or dam. The City is located inland and not near a body of water, and thus would not be subject to seiche or tsunami. The Geotechnical Investigation stated that based on the flat nature of the site and the composition of the surface soil, risks associated with debris flows should be considered remote. The CVWD channel capacity is designed to accommodate a storm larger than a 100-year storm, and the risk for over-topping is therefore very low. No impact is anticipated. 294 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 55 e) No Impact. The proposed Project will be required to comply with all applicable water quality standards and will implement a WQMP approved by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for both construction activities and long-term operation of the site. The proposed Project is consistent with the City’s 2035 General Plan and the water demand is addressed in the UWMP. Therefore, it will not conflict with a sustainable groundwater management plan. Adherence to the City’s standard requirements related to water quality will ensure there will be no impact to a water quality control plan. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 295 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 56 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map, July 2016. While the proposed Project land use will result in multi-family apartments while single-family detached dwellings were proposed in the previous project, both uses are permitted as a principal use in the Medium Density Residential Zone and under the Medium/High Density Residential designation on the General Plan land use map. As described below, the proposed Project would not result in any new significant impacts or environmental impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts in the 2016 MND related to the City’s designated land uses. For this reason, the proposed Project would not result in any new potentially significant land use impacts that were not identified in the 2016 MND, or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant land use impact. Setting The Project site is currently vacant and designated as Medium/High Density Residential (net Project area portion) and Open Space – Natural (Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel portion) on the General Plan land use map. The former allows a broad range of residential land uses including apartments. The Project site is zoned as Medium Density Residential for the net Project area and Floodplain for the Channel portion, where multifamily is permitted as a principal use. A Specific Plan was approved as part of the previous Project to subdivide the 3.22-acre property into 16 single-family lots. The applicant will seek to rescind the Specific Plan as part of the proposed Project. Discussion a) No Impact. The subject property is a vacant 3.22-acre ‘island’ that has been privately used and is physically separated from surrounding residential projects on its south, west and north sides. It abuts the Westward Isles condominium community to the east but does not gain access or otherwise encroach into the community. No impact is anticipated. 296 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 57 b) Less than Significant Impact. The subject property is designated for Medium/High Density Residential purposes in the General Plan and zoned as Medium Density Residential (MDR) on the City Zoning Map. The Project includes the rescinding of the previously approved Specific Plan for the site. The Project also proposes a variance to the 22’ maximum building height allowed within 150 feet of an Image Corridor as required in the Zoning Code. The Specific Plan was required of the previous project in order to address variations in zoning standards proposed as part of that project. The currently proposed Project does not require such changes in standards, and complies with the development standards for the Medium Density Residential zone. As a result, the proposed Project does not require a Specific Plan to conform to existing City standards. As regards the proposed Variance, the proposed apartments are 25’ tall at their highest point, which is consistent with the development standards for the MDR Zone outside an Image Corridor. The Zoning Ordinance allows for Variances when certain findings can be made. In this case, the property, as a remnant parcel that is very narrow and unusual in shape, does not benefit from the same development potential as its neighboring parcels. The Project site does not, because of its configuration, allow for the same setbacks as other parcels in the area, and the proposed Project proposes to exceed the Zoning Ordinance requirement for Image Corridors by 3 feet. This does not represent a significant increase in height in the Image Corridor, and as analyzed in Section I, Aesthetics, will not result in significant aesthetic impacts or blockage of views. The Project will not, therefore, substantially conflict with any plans, policies, or regulations with jurisdiction over the Project, and impacts associated with the Project will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 297 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 58 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XII. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; “Mineral Land Classification Map, Aggregate Resources Only, Palm Springs Production-Consumption Region,” California Division of Mines and Geology, 1987. There are no changes in the area and location of the proposed Project, no substantial changes in other aspects of the Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant environmental impacts or substantial increase in the severity or previously identified significant impact related to mineral resources. As explained below, the proposed Project would have no impacts to mineral sources, which is consistent with the 2016 MND. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any new impacts to mineral resources. Setting The State of California has recognized the importance of mineral resources for construction materials and other economic purposes. The California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) addresses the loss of regionally significant mineral deposits to urban development. The Act requires the Department of Conservation to create Production-Consumption Regions, which are areas where significant mineral resources of statewide importance and regional significance are produced and consumed, and a classification system that identifies lands where significant mineral resource deposits are located. The City is located in the Palm Springs Production-Consumption Region. This region covers approximately 631 square miles of the Coachella Valley from near Cabazon to Thermal. Lands within the Production-Consumption Region are classified according to the presence of valuable mineral resources. The Project area is located within Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1). This zone includes areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. 298 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 59 Discussion a, b) No Impact. The proposed Project will not result in the loss of availability of a locally or regionally important mineral resource. The California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology has mapped the City’s mineral resources and designated the Project site as “MRZ-1,” which represents areas where adequate geologic information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood for their presence exists. The subject property is designated for Medium/High Density Residential purposes in the General Plan and zoned as Medium Density Residential on the City Zoning Map, which would not accommodate mineral resource recovery. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 299 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 60 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XIII. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Generation of substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Sources: 2035 General Plan Noise Element; La Quinta Municipal Code; Project materials; “Noise Impact Analysis Tract 36875” prepared by Urban Crossroads, 3/25/15. There are no substantial changes in the proposed Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts related to noise. As described below, the noise levels generated by the proposed Project during operation would be less than significant. With the implementation of mitigation measures, impacts associated with construction noise will also be less than significant. Setting The primary source of noise in the City and Sphere is traffic. Section 9.100.210 of the City’s Municipal Code governs noise control in the City. The current noise standards allow noise levels of 65 dBA from 7 AM to 10 PM, and 50 dBA from 10 PM to 7 AM for noise sensitive uses, including residential units. This standard is more stringent than the CNEL standard and can be modified by City Council. The Noise Impact Analysis for the previous project indicated that the previously proposed units facing Jefferson Street will experience unmitigated exterior noise levels ranging from 53.3 to 71.5 dBA CNEL in the General Plan buildout scenario (2035). 300 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 61 Discussion a) Less than Significant with Mitigation. The subject property is currently vacant and undeveloped. The main noise source in the area is vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways (Jefferson Street). The surrounding area mainly consists of residential and commercial development. The nearest sensitive receptors are residents in the 28 Westward Isle homes located to the east of the Project site. Construction Noise Development of the proposed Project will temporarily generate noise and groundborne vibrations through construction related activities, but will cease once the Project is in operation. Construction noise is exempt from the noise standards set forth in Section 9.100.210 of the Zoning Ordinance; it is restricted to certain days of the week and times of day (Municipal Code Section 6.08.050). Adherence to these limitations will reduce construction-related impacts to less than significant levels. Operational Noise During the long-term operational phase, noise levels will be comparable to similar existing residential development in the project area. Principal noise sources will be from vehicles traveling along Jefferson Street, and general vehicle activity accessing the site (residents, deliveries, etc.). Limited noise may be emitted by onsite mechanical equipment, such as that associated with residential landscaping, and home improvement/repair. Given the similar residential development on adjacent properties, the Project will not result in a perceptible permanent increase in ambient noise levels over existing conditions. It will be required to comply with the operational noise levels established in the Zoning Ordinance related to residential property. A noise impact analysis was prepared for the previous project and used the FHWA predictive modeling methodology based on adjacent roadway design capacity established in the La Quinta General Plan. The study analyzed the potential noise impacts from Jefferson Street traffic and found that the previous project would be subject to short term (construction) and long term (operational) noise impacts which could be significant without mitigation. The current Project proposes a 20 feet setback from the property line for the apartment buildings facing Jefferson Street. In the previous project, the residential lots facing Jefferson Street abut the property line, and homes were much closer to the street than the currently proposed multi-family buildings. Therefore, applying the noise impact analysis for the previous project to the proposed Project would be conservative. The noise study found that outdoor noise levels associated with vehicular traffic adjacent to the Project site have the potential to exceed the City’s standards for residential land uses without mitigation on Jefferson Street, where the 65 dBA CNEL threshold is expected to be exceeded at up to 71.5 dBA. The three buildings (Building 1, 2 & 5) along Jefferson Street will be affected by potential impacts from roadway noise. Without mitigation, these buildings would have exterior noise levels in excess of the City’s standard of 65 dBA CNEL. The study recommends mitigation along Jefferson Street 301 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 62 by constructing a six-foot noise barrier. This is a typical component of residential projects and is included in the proposed Project plans. With the recommended noise barrier, the mitigated future exterior noise levels will range from 64.5 to 65.0 dBA CNEL in the General Plan buildout scenario (2035). Acoustical analysis will also be required to verify exterior and interior noise standard compliance during building plan check reviews. In summary, the noise impacts from Project construction will be short-term and less than significant. Noise impacts from Project operation would be significant without mitigation. However, traffic-related noise levels at Project buildout with mitigation incorporated will not exceed the “conditionally acceptable” (65 dBA CNEL) noise levels for multi‐family residential uses set forth in the General Plan. Therefore, long-term noise impacts are expected to be less than significant, with mitigation. b) Less than Significant Impact. During construction, temporary and periodic ground-borne vibration and noise may occur, particularly as heavy equipment grades the site. Noise and vibrations would be short-term and will cease once construction is complete. Construction will be required to occur during the less sensitive day times permitted in the Municipal Code (Section 6.08.050). The proposed Project consists of residential use and thus does not include any sources of operational vibration. No long-term impacts associated are expected from the development of the proposed Project. c) No Impact. The Project is located approximately 2.25 miles to the south of the Bermuda Dunes Municipal Airport. The subject property is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of a public airport or private airstrip. The Project site falls well outside the 65 dBA noise contour of the Bermuda Dunes Airport. The Project will not expose people working or residing in the Project area to excessive noise levels. Mitigation Measures: 1. A six-foot high noise attenuation barrier, conforming to the recommended criteria of the approved noise impact analysis dated 3/25/15 and prepared by Urban Crossroads, shall be incorporated into the Project. 2. An interior noise analysis shall be submitted with building plans for individual buildings are submitted, to assure that all residential units shall have interior noise levels of 45 dBA CNEL, consistent with the recommended interior noise mitigation criteria of the of the approved noise impact analysis dated 3/25/15, prepared by Urban Crossroads. Monitoring: A. The City’s Planning and Building Divisions shall assure that necessary mitigation measures as identified are incorporated into the final building construction plans. Responsible Party: Planning Division, Building Division 302 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 63 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Sources: Project materials; State of California, Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State — January 1, 2020. While the current Project proposes a 40-unit multi-family apartment as compared to 16 single- family detached dwellings in the previous project, there are no substantial changes in the proposed Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity or previously identified impacts related to population and housing. As described below, the current Project would have less than significant impacts on population and housing, and is largely consistent with the impacts analyzed in the 2016 MND. Setting The Project site is located in the City of La Quinta, with a current population of approximately 40,660 persons, which is expected to grow to 47,700 in 2040.2 Currently, the City is composed of a mix of single-family, multi-family, and mobile homes development, but the majority (87.8%) of housing units are single-family homes. Discussion a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will result in the development of 40 apartment units with two or three bedrooms. Based on an average household size of 2.60 persons, build out of the Project could result in an increased population of 104. However, the increase will not represent substantial population growth in the area, and the proposed residential units would accommodate the new population anticipated in growth forecasts. The Project site is located on 2 2016 -2040 RTPSCS Demographics and Growth Forecast by Southern California Association of Governments. 303 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 64 existing streets, and utilities and public facilities are available in the immediate area. No new road or utility infrastructure is required. Overall, less than significant impacts are anticipated. b) No Impact. The subject property is vacant, and the proposed Project would not displace any existing housing or require replacement housing elsewhere. No impact will occur. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 304 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 65 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XV. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Project materials; State of California, Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State — January 1, 2020. While the current Project proposes a 40-unit multi-family apartment as compared to 16 single- family detached dwellings in the previous project, there are no substantial changes in the proposed Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity or previously identified impacts related to public services. As described below, the current Project would have less than significant impacts on public services and is largely consistent with the impacts analyzed in the 2016 MND. Setting Fire Protection The County of Riverside Fire Department (RCFD) provides fire protection to the City of La Quinta on a contract basis. The City of La Quinta has fire stations at three locations. The nearest fire station to the Project site is located at 44555 Adams Street, approximately 2 miles northwest of the Project site. 305 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 66 Police Protection The City of La Quinta contracts for police services with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The mayor, council members, and city manager set the level of service that they believe meets the needs of the community and the Riverside County Sheriff's Department provides the personnel, equipment, and resources to fulfill the city’s needs. There are two Police Department offices that serve the City: Civic Center Community Policing Office located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, approximately 3.75 miles southwest of the Project site, and La Quinta Sheriff’s Station located at 86-625 Airport Boulevard in Mecca. Schools There are two school districts providing public education to students in kindergarten through 12th grade in La Quinta: Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) and Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). The Project area is within the DSUSD boundary and served by the Carrillo Ranch Elementary School, John Glenn Middle School, and La Quinta High School. DSUSD receives funding from State funds and local property taxes. DSUSD is authorized to collect school facilities fees as provided for in Government Code Section 53080 et. seq. and 65995 et seq. in the amount of $4.08 per square foot of residential development. Parks The City of La Quinta currently operates 11 city parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. All city parks, with the exception of the Civic Center Campus, provide a children’s playground facility. La Quinta Municipal Code Section 13.48 establishes criteria for dedicating land, or payment of in lieu fees for construction of new parks or recreational facilities or rehabilitation of existing facilities. All residential developments subdivisions containing five or more parcels are required to pay a park development fee, dedicate land, or both. The City General Plan sets a requirement for providing a minimum of 5 acres per 1,000 population. Discussion a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will increase the demand for fire services in the City due to new permanent residential uses leading to a slight population increase. Project development will be in accordance with all City Municipal Code and RCFD Fire Protection Standards to assure adequate fire safety and emergency response. The Project will be required to pay development impact fees toward fire protection services at building permit issuance. Impacts will be less than significant. The addition of 40 multi-family apartment units will marginally increase the need for police services for 104 additional persons; overall impact to police services is expected to be less than significant. The Project vicinity is currently patrolled and will continue to be patrolled after Project development. The site will be accessible from Jefferson Street, and the Project will be required to comply with all Police Department regulations and procedures. No construction of new or expanded police services or facilities are required for the proposed Project. 306 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 67 Based on DSUSD student generation rates, shown below, the Project has the potential to generate approximately 40 kindergarten through twelfth grade students. The proposed Project will be subject to the DSUSD developer fees in place at the time development occurs, which currently stand at $4.08 per square foot of residential.3 Payment of the developer fee would mitigate potential significant impacts to school resources to less than significant levels. Table 7 Project Student Generation School Type Generation Rate (per residential unit) Project’s Student Generation Elementary School 0.1543 17 Middle School 0.0867 10 High School 0.1203 13 Total: 40 Source: Desert Sands Unified School District - Fee Justification Study For New Residential And Commercial/Industrial Development, February 27, 2020, Table VI District Wide Student Generation Rate and Project materials. The Project will result in an increase in permanent population and their guests, which have the potential to increase the use of existing local or regional park and other public facilities. The development proposes onsite recreational amenities and open spaces for the site that would help offset the impact to the city’s existing park and other public facilities. The proposed Project will participate in the City’s parkland in-lieu fee program to offset impacts associated with parks generated by the 104 new residents. Overall, Project buildout is expected to marginally impact local and/or regional park/other public facilities. No additional public facilities are required for the proposed Project to accommodate residents. Increase in demand for the City’s existing park and other public facilities will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 3 School Impact/Developer Fees, Desert Sands Unified School District, effective 5/16/20. 307 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 68 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XVI. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Project materials. While the current Project proposes a 40-unit multi-family apartment as compared to 16 single- family detached dwellings in the previous project, there are no substantial changes in the proposed Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts related to recreation resources. As described below, the currently proposed Project will have less than significant impacts on recreation, consistent with the previously analyzed project. Setting There are approximately 5,259 acres of open space areas set aside for recreational facilities in the City, including a variety of city owned and maintained parks and facilities, County owned parks, Desert Recreation District facilities and public and private golf courses. In addition, there are approximately 6,933 acres of natural open space areas within the City offering hiking trails, equestrian trails, and other passive recreation opportunities. The Desert Recreation District provides park facilities and recreation programs throughout the Coachella Valley. The Desert Recreation District owns and operates the La Quinta Community Park, and is proposing a Discovery Center near Lake Cahuilla. Discussion a, b) Less than Significant Impact. At buildout, the proposed Project will result in an estimated population of 104 residents. The proposed Project will include onsite recreational amenities such as a swimming pool, barbecue facilities, and open space common areas. Residents can be expected to utilize onsite recreational amenities as well as local and regional recreational facilities. The 308 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 69 addition of approximately 104 persons to the City population constitutes a minor incremental increase in recreational demand, given the availability of public recreational opportunities. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 309 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 70 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XVII. TRANSPORTATION -- Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? X b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X d) Result in inadequate emergency access? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Jefferson Street Snellenberger Access Assessment, prepared by Urban Crossroads, October 14, 2020; Jefferson Street Snellenberger Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, prepared by Urban Crossroads, October 6, 2020. Compared to the 2016 project, the currently proposed site plan involves several changes to site access and parking. The changes and how they will impact traffic and transportation are described below. However, there is no new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts related to transportation or traffic. As described below, the currently proposed Project will have less than significant impacts on traffic, consistent with the previously analyzed project. Setting All roadways in the City are classified into various roadway types based on number of lanes and other facilities, including bicycle lanes, sidewalks and parkways. The City’s acceptable Level of Service (LOS) for both roadway segments and intersection operations is LOS D or better. Currently, the Project site is vacant and undeveloped. Existing roadways in the vicinity of the Project site include Jefferson Street, Westward Ho Drive, and Highway 111. 310 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 71 Changes to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines were adopted in December 2018, which require all lead agencies to adopt VMT as a replacement for automobile delay-based level of service (LOS) as the new measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects. This statewide mandate went into effect July 1, 2020. To aid in this transition, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released a Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018). Based on OPR’s Technical Advisory, the City of La Quinta has prepared their Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Policy. Based on consultation with the City’s Traffic Engineer, and the approval of a scoping agreement, Urban Crossroads has prepared a Project VMT analysis (Appendix B) based on the adopted City Guidelines. Urban Crossroads also prepared an access assessment for the proposed Project (Appendix C). The Project trip generation rate is based on Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. Land Use Code 220 (Multifamily Housing Low-Rise) was used for the Project trip generation analysis. Discussion a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will result in the development of 40 multifamily apartment units. The Project is forecast to generate approximately 293 daily vehicle trips, including 18 trips during the AM peak hour and 22 trips during the PM peak hour. The trip reducing potential of modal split was not incorporated for conservative analysis. Note that there is potential for multi-modal transportation in the Project area with existing bike routes and facilities, so the Project trip volumes may be overestimated. Table 8 Project Trip Generation Summary Trip Generation Rates Land Use ITE Code Unit AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Residential 220 DU 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.56 7.32 Trips Generated Land Use Quantity Unit AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Residential 40 DU 4 14 18 14 8 22 293 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). DU = Dwelling Units A right-in/right-out access to the Project is provided via Jefferson Street without median break at the Project Driveway intersection. Jefferson Street is a north‐south oriented roadway located west of the Project and classified as a 6‐lane divided major arterial in the City of La Quinta Circulation Plan. Jefferson Street is constructed to its ultimate General Plan designation. Curb‐and‐gutter and sidewalk improvements are in place, and site access curb cuts will be constructed to accommodate the proposed driveway location. Maneuvers in and out of the site will be limited to right turns only, and U‐turns are anticipated to occur at upstream (Westward Ho Drive) and downstream (Highway 111) intersections north and south of the Project. 311 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 72 The access assessment estimated trip distribution patterns based on the geographical location of the site, the location of surrounding uses, and the proximity to the regional freeway system. Based on the Project trip generation and trip distribution pattern, peak hour turn volumes entering the Project traffic intersection were determined to be less than 15 vehicles per hour per lane. Based on the projected low peak hour turn volumes at the Project driveway, cross-street stop control at the Project driveway location is appropriate. Intersection and queueing analyses have been evaluated for Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Projects (EAPC) conditions. Existing counts at the Project Driveway were estimated based on the Existing (2020) peak hour counts at the nearby intersection of Jefferson Street and Highway 111. To estimate for opening year future conditions, existing counts were increased by 6% and cumulative data from known cumulative City of La Quinta and City of Indio developments were added to the Jefferson Street volumes. The EAPC intersection operations analysis results are summarized in Table 9, which indicates that the intersection of Jefferson Street and the Project Driveway is anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS “C”) during the peak hours. Table 9 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Projects Intersection Delay and Levels of Service Intersection Traffic Control1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay2 LOS3 Delay LOS Jefferson Street / Project Driveway CSS 18.7 C 21.8 C 1 CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 Per the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6), intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. Delay and level of service is calculated using Synchro 10.1 analysis software. 3 LOS = Level of Service Table 10 shows the estimated cumulative future inbound and outbound right turn traffic queues at the Project Driveway. The anticipated 95th percentile traffic queue at the Project Driveway is nominal for the northbound right turn and at maximum 29 ft. for the westbound right turn, which is not anticipated to block vehicles from entering or exiting the nearest parking isle. Table 10 Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Projects Queueing Analysis Intersection Turning Movement Lane EAPC 95th Percentile Queue Length1 AM PM Peak Hour Volume AM PM Jefferson Street / Project Driveway northbound 4 14 PM 14 NOM NOM westbound 14 8 AM 14 29 27 NOM = Nominal, queue length undetectable 1 Queue length calculated using SimTraffic. 312 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 73 In summary, results of the EAPC intersection and queueing analyses indicate that the intersection of Jefferson Street at the Project Driveway is anticipated to operate at acceptable LOS (LOS “C”) during the peak hours, and that no significant traffic queues will occur. Therefore, the proposed access will not have a significant impact on traffic in the Project vicinity and there is no need for a separate northbound right turn lane on Jefferson Street. Alternative Transportation Planning There are existing bicycle paths in the Project area: Class II Bicycle Path (on road bicycle lane) on Jefferson Street between Westward Ho Drive and Highway 111, Class I Bicycle Path (exclusive bicycle/pedestrian lane) on Highway 111 west of Jefferson Street, and Class III & II Bicycle Paths on Westward Ho Drive west of Jefferson Street (General Plan Exhibit II-6). Residents will enjoy access to the City’s growing bicycle network along surrounding major streets immediately from the proposed Project. SunLine Transit Agency provides bus transit services to the Coachella Valley, including the cities of Indio and La Quinta. Currently, the proposed Project site and vicinity are not directly served by SunLine on Jefferson Street. The nearest existing bus stop is on the northwest and southeast corners of Jefferson Street at Highway 111, approximately 1/3 mile from the Project site. Future residents, guests, visitors, and employees (construction, security, maintenance etc.) may access SunLine bus service at this location, and given the relatively short distance to the Project site, will have access to bus service within walking distance. The proposed Project will not alter or interfere with the existing sidewalk and bike lane on Jefferson Street along the westerly boundary. The proposed Project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No project-related impact is anticipated. b) No Impact. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 sets forth guidelines for implementing Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). SB 743 requires amendments to the CEQA Guidelines (pre-2019) to provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating transportation impacts. Particularly within areas served by transit, those alternative criteria must “promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.” (Public Resources Code Section 21099(b)(1)) Measurements of transportation impacts may include “vehicle miles traveled, vehicle miles traveled per capita, automobile trip generation rates, or automobile trips generated.” The City’s VMT Guidelines describe specific screening criteria that can be used to identify when a proposed land use project is anticipated to result in a less than significant impact without conducting a more detailed project level VMT analysis. A land use project need only meet one of the screening thresholds to result in a less than significant impact: Step 1: Project Type Screening Step 2: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening Step 3: Low VMT Area Screening 313 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 74 The proposed Project is not, as required by the first screening step, a small commercial project and would therefore not qualify for this screening criteria; nor is it located within ½ mile of a major transit stop or in a Transit Priority Area, so it would not qualify for the second screening criteria. However, the project is a “residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area.” The analysis prepared for the proposed Project demonstrates that the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) in which the Project is located is identified as a low VMT-generating area in the Riverside County Travel Demand Model (RivTAM), and has VMT below the City’s average VMT per service population. Table 11 presents the calculation outputs for TAZ 4739, in which the Project is located, and shows that the TAZ generates total VMT per service population of 15.76 for base year conditions. As also shown in the Table, the City’s average VMT per service population is 30.78. Therefore, the VMT in the Project’s TAZ falls far below the City’s VMT, and the Project, under the City’s VMT Guidance, can be determined to have less than significant impacts on circulation. Therefore, the Project will not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b). Table 11 Total VMT per Service Population TAZ 4739 City CVAG VMT 88,332 1,799,092 21,386,904 Population 5,197 45,300 438,485 Employment 407 13,148 154,975 Service Population 5,604 58,448 593,460 VMT per Service Population 15.76 30.78 36.04 c, d) No Impact. The Project proposes access from Jefferson Street via a driveway with a minimum width of 28.0 feet with standard City of La Quinta curb returns with a radius of 35.0 feet. As discussed in subsection (a) above, with the design of a right-turn only access to the Project site to Jefferson Street, the conditions at the site access point are expected to operate safely without significant delay. Emergency access will be provided at three locations: an existing fire access gate on the southwest corner facing the landscaped area with access to Jefferson Street, and two new fire access gates on the northwest and northeast corners with access to Palm Circle Drive. Prior to construction, both the Fire Department and Police Department will review the site plan to ensure safety measures are addressed, including emergency access and geometric design. No incompatible uses are proposed. Therefore, the proposed Project will not result in inadequate emergency access or increased traffic hazards. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 314 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 75 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES— a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.i(k), or X ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey – Indian Springs Villas Project, prepared by CRM Tech, December 2015; Cultural Resources Sensitivity Review, Indian Springs Villas Project, prepared by CRM Tech, June 2015; Project materials; Email communication with Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, dated 6/22/20; Email communication with Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation, dated 4/27/20; Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, letters dated 10/27/15, 2/3/16 & 7/15/20. In the 2016 IS/MND, tribal resources were not analyzed since they were not included in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines at the time. The subject property is located in an area traditionally occupied by the Cahuilla people. The mitigation measures established in Section V., Cultural Resources will be applied to ensure the protection of potential tribal resources. These mitigation measures are consistent with the previous MND, and neither changed conditions or increased impacts are expected as a result of the proposed Project. Consequently, impacts related to tribal resources would not result in a new potentially significant environmental effect that was not identified in the 2016 MND. 315 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 76 Setting As discussed in the Section V, Cultural Resources, Cahuilla Indians are known to have lived in the Coachella Valley for thousands of years. They were Takic-speaking and lived in various groups in the area. Today, Native Americans of Pass or Desert Cahuilla heritage are mostly affiliated with one or more of the Indian reservations in and near the Coachella Valley, including the Cabazon, Augustine, Torres Martinez, Twenty-nine Palms, Agua Caliente, and Morongo. Numerous cultural resources are found throughout the valley which are considered non-renewable resources because they provide important information about the past. Discussion i, ii) Less than Significant with Mitigation. A Local Government Tribal Consultation List Request was sent to the State Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in April 2020. The City then initiated Tribal Consultation in conformance with AB 52 requirements and contacted the twelve tribes recommended by NAHC in writing in April 2020. As of September, three tribes have responded, including the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, who indicated no presence of Native American resources on the Project site; and the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation who had no comment on the Project. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) also responded, and requested consultation and copies of cultural resource documentation. The ACBCI was provided the field survey report for the Project site (CRM 2015) and the initial study for the previously proposed project on July 31, 2020. ACBCI stated in their response that the letter does not conclude consultation, and that upon receipt of requested materials the ACBCI THPO may have additional recommendations or require further mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 includes a requirement for an ACBCI Tribal Monitor to be present during earth moving activities in anticipation of ACBCI’s anticipated request. Once the City receives further response from ACBCI or other tribes, any requests and input from consultation will be included in conditions of approval and/or added to this Subsequent Initial Study prior to completion of the environmental review process. To protect potential tribal cultural resources, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 is included in Section V, consistent with the findings of the cultural resource investigation, and potential concerns of the tribes, to require monitoring of ground disturbing activities, which would reduce the impacts to Tribal Resources to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: See Section V (Cultural Resources). Monitoring: See Section V (Cultural Resources). 316 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 77 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? X b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? X c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? X e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Source: La Quinta 2035 General Plan; Jefferson Street Apartments Site Development Permit No. 2020-0001 Hydrology January 30, 2020, and Project Specific Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan April 23, 2020, both prepared by Watson Engineering. While the current Project proposes a 40-unit multi-family apartment as compared to 16 single- family detached dwellings in the previous project, there are no substantial changes in the proposed Project or new information of substantial importance since the 2016 MND that would result in any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity or previously identified impacts related to utilities and service systems. As described below, the proposed Project would have less than significant impacts to utilities and service systems, and is largely consistent with previous analyses. 317 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 78 Setting Domestic Water The Project site is located within the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) service area for domestic water. The District’s primary water source is groundwater extracted through a system of wells located throughout the City and region. In addition to groundwater, CVWD relies on imported water brought to the region by regional canals, which is stored or recharged into the aquifer at basins in the west end of the Valley (Whitewater River, northwest of Palm Springs); in the southeastern section of the City (Dike 4); and in Martinez Canyon, south and east of the City. CVWD also owns and operates the water distribution system, which is generally located under existing streets in the public right‐of-way. The District also maintains water storage tanks throughout its service area, including ten existing or planned tanks in the City and its Sphere, with capacities ranging from 250,000 to 10 million gallons. CVWD is responsible, under the California Water Code, for analyzing its current and future water supply, and assuring that sufficient supply is available to serve land uses within the District, through the preparation of an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). CVWD is required to periodically update the Plan. Wastewater The Coachella Valley Water District also provides sewer service to the Project area and the City of La Quinta. The Project site is located in an urban area served by CVWD with existing main sewer lines. The Project will extend sewer lines from existing 18” sewer mains in Jefferson Street throughout the Project site. For all land in the City and Sphere located south of Miles Avenue including the Project area, sewage is treated at the WRP-4 located in Thermal, which has a capacity of 9.9 million gallons per day. The average flow to WRP-4 is approximately 5 to 5.5 million gallons per day (mgd).4 There is currently excess capacity at WRP-4. WRP-4 does not include tertiary treatment facilities; however, plans are underway to extend the tertiary-treated water delivery system to other areas in the valley. CVWD also implements the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board pertaining to domestic water quality and wastewater discharge. Stormwater Management Several watersheds drain the adjoining elevated terrain of the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains towards the valley floor. Regional stormwater flows within the Project area are conveyed by the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. The Project area is designated Zone X on FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Maps, which is defined as moderate and low risk areas, including areas of 500-year flood, areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood. 4 Sanitary Sewer Overflow Response Plan (SSORP) For Collection Systems & Wastewater Treatment Plants, Coachella Valley Water District Operations Department Sanitation Section, December 1, 2019. 318 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 79 Solid Waste Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC (Burrtec) provides solid waste disposal to the City through a franchise agreement. Non-hazardous household, commercial and most nonhazardous industrial solid waste collected is taken to the Edom Hill Transfer Station (EHTS) in Cathedral City, or the Coachella Valley Transfer Station (CVTS), located north of the I-10 freeway, east of Dillon Road. From either site, waste is generally transported to the Lamb Canyon regional landfill, which is owned by the County of Riverside and had a remaining capacity of 19,242,950 cubic yards as of 2015. Discussion a-c) Less than Significant Impact. Water and Wastewater The subject property falls within the jurisdiction of the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for domestic water and wastewater treatment services. The proposed Project will be connected to the existing domestic water pipelines under Jefferson Street. CVWD’s Water Management Plan 2015 Update demonstrates that the District has available, or can supply in the future, sufficient water to serve additional development in its service area. The water management plan includes a combination of continued groundwater extraction, conservation programs, additional water sources and source substitution, and groundwater recharge opportunities. The proposed Project is consistent with the City’s 2035 General Plan and is therefore addressed in the UWMP. The 2015 UWMP demonstrates that CVWD has available, or can supply, sufficient water to serve the proposed Project. The proposed Project will require construction of on-site sewer infrastructure to connect to the existing sewer mains located under Jefferson Street rights-of-way. Project-generated sewage will be conveyed to and treated at WRP-4, with the average annual flow of 5 to 5.5 million gallons per day (mgd), well below its capacity of 9.9 mgd. Therefore, the plant has sufficient capacity to serve additional development, including the relatively small proposed Project. The Project wastewater discharges will be typical of residential uses and would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the CVWD or Regional Water Quality Control Board. Given the relatively small scale of the Project, Project-related impacts to water and wastewater supplies and services will be less than significant. Stormwater Drainage Compared to current conditions, the proposed Project represents an increase in impervious surfaces. The proposed Project includes retention and conveyance facilities to manage storm flows, designed to meet local stormwater retention requirements. The site will be graded to direct drainage as surface flow around the buildings and parking areas toward the two proposed catch basins that are designed to accept the BMP treatment volume. When that volume is exceeded, excess flow will flow into Jefferson Street and discharge into the existing catch basin adjacent to the Project site that discharges directly to the Channel. The Project Hydrology Report concluded that the existing basin has the capacity to accept and discharge the drainage into the CVWD Channel. The Project will not require the construction or expansion of stormwater management facilities. 319 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 80 Electricity The Project will provide local connections to the existing IID infrastructure in the Project area. IID has existing facilities underground within Jefferson Street. The Project will not require the addition or expansion of electric power facilities. Natural Gas The Project will provide local connections to the existing SoCalGas infrastructure in the Project area. There is a 4-inch gas line located underground within the Jefferson Street rights-of-way. The Project will not require the addition or expansion of natural gas facilities. Telecommunications The Project will provide local connections to the existing Frontier Communications and Spectrum infrastructure in the Project area. The Project will not require to the addition or expansion of telecommunication facilities. d, e) Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, Burrtec provides solid waste services to the City of La Quinta. Solid waste generated by the city is either recycled, reused, or transformed at a waste-to-energy facility5, or disposed of at county’s landfills, in general at Lamb Canyon regional landfill, which has a remaining capacity of 19,242,950 cubic yards as of 2015.6 The Project will generate 26.28 tons of solid waste per year as shown below. Table 12 Estimated Solid Waste Disposal at the Project Buildout Land Use CIWMB Disposal Rates* Proposed Solid Waste Disposal (pounds per day) Solid Waste Disposal (tons per year) Residential 3.6 pounds/unit /day 40 DU 144 26.28 TOTAL (with 50% diversion) 13.14 *Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates by CalRecycle, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates, accessed September 2020. At buildout, the proposed Project will contribute less than 0.002% of the County landfill’s remaining capacity.7 Commingled recyclable materials (e.g., paper, plastic, glass, cardboard, aluminum) will be transported to Burrtec’s material recovery facilities for recycling and reuse. Burrtec is responsible for maintaining standards that assure that all waste is handled in a manner that meets local, state and federal standards. These requirements will assure that impacts associated with solid waste disposal remain less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 5 Riverside County Nondisposal Facility Element by Riverside County Department of Waste Resources (2015), https://www.rcwaste.org/Portals/0/Files/Planning/CIWMP/NDFE.PDF, accessed September 2020. 6 CalRecycle SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2246?siteID=2368, accessed September 2020. 7 Assumes that 1 CY of residential solid waste is equivalent to 95 lbs. “Volume to Weight Conversion Factors,” US EPA Office of Resource Conversion and Recovery. April 2016. 320 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 81 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? X c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? X d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? X Sources: La Quinta 2035 General Plan Draft EIR; Fire and Resources Assessment Program (FRAP) maps, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Wildfire hazards were analyzed under Section IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials in the 2016 MND. The 2016 MND determined the previous project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk associated with wildfire hazards. The proposed Project encompasses the same area and location, and will have no wildfire-related impacts, as explained below. Setting Wildfire is a nonstructural fire that occurs in vegetative fuels, excluding prescribed fire. Wildfires can occur in undeveloped areas and spread to urban areas where landscape and structures are not designed and maintained to be ignition resistant. A wildland-urban interface (WUI) is an area where urban development is located in proximity to open space or “wildland” areas. The potential for wildland fires represents a hazard where development is adjacent to open space or within close proximity to wildland fuels or designated fire severity zones. While the western portion of the City, 321 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 82 such as the Cove, is located near the urban-wildland interface, the wilderness areas that surround La Quinta are made up of Granitic rock and sparse desert vegetation and thus does not provide the explosive fuels needed for wildfires. The project site is not located near this interface, and is in the City’s urban core, well away from the surrounding mountains. Wildfire risk within the City is considered less than significant. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) has mapped areas of significant fire hazards in the state through its Fire and Resources Assessment Program (FRAP). These maps place areas of the state into different Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) based on a hazard scoring system using subjective criteria for fuels, fire history, terrain influences, housing density, and occurrence of severe fire weather where urban conflagration could result in catastrophic losses. The subject property is designated as a local responsibility area, not located in or near a state responsibility area or designated as a very high fire hazard severity zones (VHFHSZ). Discussion a) No Impact. The subject property and immediate Project vicinity encompass developed residential/commercial areas and are approximately 4 miles from the nearest wildlands (Santa Rosa Mountains). According to CalFire fire hazard mapping, the subject property is not located in or near a state responsibility area or designated as a very high fire hazard severity zones. Emergency access will be provided following the Riverside County Fire Department’s design guidelines at three locations: an existing fire access gate on the southwest corner facing the landscaped area with access to Jefferson Street, and two new fire access gates on the northwest and northeast corners with access to Palm Circle Drive. The City has established emergency evacuation routes for its neighborhoods, to assure that residents can leave their neighborhoods safely. Development on the subject property would not substantially impair the City’s adopted emergency evacuation and response plans8 as the Project is not proposing to amend these plans to impede emergency evacuation. No impact is anticipated. b, c) No Impact. As noted, the proposed Project is not located within a very high wildfire hazard severity zone nor a wildland-urban interface (WUI). The Project is located in an urban environment, and miles from an area of wildland fire potential. Urban roadways exist surrounding the Project, and no new wildfire risk infrastructure will be required. No impact is anticipated. d) No Impact. The Project site is located on the valley floor where there is no potential for flooding, landslide, or post-fire slope instability. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks such as downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. No impact is anticipated. Mitigation Measures: None required Monitoring: None required 8 La Quinta General Plan Draft EIR (July 2012), Page III-100. 322 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 83 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X a) Less than Significant with Mitigation Impact. The Project site is located on Jefferson Street, a major transportation arterial and surrounded by developed or previously disturbed lands. The site is not located within a CVMSHCP-designated conservation area and does not contain any wildlife corridors or biological linkage areas. The site may offer limited nesting sites for birds; therefore, a preconstruction survey will be required to avoid impacts to nesting birds covered by the MBTA during breeding season. In addition, the site is subject to payment of the Development Mitigation Fee to mitigate potential impacts to covered species under the CVMSHCP. 323 Jefferson Street Apartments November / 2020 84 The proposed Project will not significantly reduce fish or wildlife habitat or otherwise adversely impact a fish or wildlife species. Compliance with the MBTA will ensure impacts to sensitive species are reduced to less than significant levels. The proposed Project will have the same impacts on biological resources as the previous project, insofar as the same development area will be disturbed, and the same mitigation measure for protected nesting birds imposed as was required for the previous project. No cultural resources are known to exist within or adjacent to the Project site. Since the Project will require excavation, there is potential for unknown resources to be uncovered. Mitigation measures provided in this document will ensure that impacts to cultural and/or tribal resources are less than significant in the unlikely event that resources are discovered during Project development. As is the case with biological resources, the proposed Project will have the same impacts on cultural resources as the previously analyzed project, because it will disturb the same area. With the implementation of the mitigation measure previously included in the original MND, the impact on these resources will be less than significant, and consistent with the previous project. Overall, there will be no significant environmental impacts which cannot be mitigated. Project- related impacts, including cumulative impacts, are considered less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. The Project will result in incremental environmental impacts typically associated with residential development, such as increased emission of criteria pollutants during demolition and grading, traffic generation, and increased demand for water and wastewater services. A significant impact could occur if the proposed Project, in conjunction with related projects, would result in impacts that would be less than significant when viewed separately, but would be significant when viewed together. Here, however, the impacts of the proposed Project are individually limited and not cumulatively considerable. The proposed Project is consistent with the development envisioned for this area of the City in the City’s General Plan. The property will take access from the existing roadway network and is already served by or has access to public utilities and infrastructure. It will provide for stormwater management. All environmental impacts that could occur as a result of the proposed Project would be less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures included herein, and when viewed in conjunction with other closely related past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not be significant. The impacts associated with the proposed Project, when compared to the impacts analyzed in the previous MND, will be substantially the same as those previously analyzed, and will not be cumulatively considerable, as described in this document. c) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, with the implementation of the City’s Municipal Code, other standard requirements and requirements of law, and the mitigation measures included in this document. 324 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, AND VARIANCE FOR THE JEFFERSON STREET APARTMENTS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND PALM CIRCLE DRIVE CASE NUMBERS: SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0001 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2020-0001 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-0001 VARIANCE 2020-0001 APPLICANT: JIM SNELLENBERGER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16th day of February, 2021, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Jim Snellenberger for approval of the Jefferson Street Apartments, a forty unit residential apartment project, generally located at the southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Palm Circle Drive, more particularly described as: APN 600-080-041, 600-080-042, AND 600-080-001 THROUGH 600-080-009 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on February 5, 2021 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 26th day of January, 2021, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Jim Snellenberger for approval of the Jefferson Street Apartments, and recommended City Council approval of project via Planning Commission Resolution 2021-0003; and Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 Repeal) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant 325 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 2 of 13 to Section 9.240.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify recommending to the City Council approval of said Specific Plan: 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed Specific Plan repeal is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that it is repealing the existing Specific Plan 2015-0002, which will result in the site being regulated by its underlying Medium Density Residential zone, consistent with its Medium/High Density Residential General Plan designation. The site will change from single family residential to multifamily residential. 2. Public Welfare Approval of the proposed Specific Plan repeal will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety, and general welfare. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 3. Land Use Compatibility The proposed Specific Plan repeal will remove the existing Specific Plan 2015-0002 and result in the project site to be regulated by the underlying Medium Density Residential zone. The repeal of the Specific Plan would be consistent and compatible with the existing land use. 4. Property Suitability The Specific Plan repeal will result in the project site to be regulated by the underlying Medium Density Residential zone. The uses permitted by the Medium Density Residential zone are suitable and appropriate for the subject property in that the site is relatively flat, vacant, and the area can be served by all necessary public services 326 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 3 of 13 and utilities. The proposed project is located at the intersection of arterial streets and provides convenience to goods and services to residential neighborhoods in the vicinity. Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings per La Quinta Municipal Code Section 13.12.130 to justify approval of said Tentative Parcel Map: 1. Tentative Parcel Map 37891 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the Medium/High Density Residential land use designation as set forth in the General Plan. 2. The design and improvement of Tentative Parcel Map 37891 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval. 3. The design of Tentative Parcel Map 37891 and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4. The design of Tentative Parcel Map 37891 and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the project will be required to comply with all 327 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 4 of 13 laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality and other public health issues. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development given the site’s location along an arterial roadway and the site is relatively flat, vacant, and can be served by all necessary public services and utilities. 6. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 and the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of this code, and the Subdivision Map Act. 7. The design and improvements required for Tentative Parcel Map 37891 will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property. All roadway improvements, easements, if any and surrounding improvements will be completed to City standards. Site Development Permit 2020-0001 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium/High Density Residential. The City’s General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including apartment projects. The City’s General Plan policies relating to Medium/High Density Residential encourage a broad range of residential uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those 328 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 5 of 13 policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU-2 as the project consists of high-quality design that complements and enhances the City. The project design complements an existing high-quality modern style commercial development directly north of the project, and utilizes varying roof lines and wall depths, along with a complementary color palette. • Goal LU-5 as the project provides a broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. The project provides for an apartment project, which creates a different housing type and choice for residents within the City. • Policy LU-5.2 in considering changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. The project is changing from a single-family residential project to a multifamily apartment project to respond to market demand in residential product type to provide residents with apartments. • Goal SC-1 in that it provides a community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents by providing alternative housing types within La Quinta meanwhile providing a project that incorporates open space and common area with a pool for its residents. • Policy ED-1.2 in supporting and assisting in the retention of existing businesses, and the recruitment of new businesses. The apartment project provides additional residents nearby to Highway 111 which will allow for a working base close by to support and assist in the retention of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses. • Goal H-1 in providing housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City’s existing and project population. The apartment project of this type provides a diverse type of residential project. • Policy H-1.3 to direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. The housing development was directed to a viable area where essential public facilities 329 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 6 of 13 can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are all available. • Goal H-2 in assisting in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate-income households and Policy H-2.1 which is to increase housing choices for lower and moderate-income households. This project increases the housing choices for moderate income households. The applicant has established this would be a moderate level apartment project, providing more housing choices for moderate income households. 2. Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Medium Density Residential zone as well as the development standards of the City’s Zoning Code and in terms of architectural style and landscaping. The project satisfies the zone’s intent to provide for the development of medium density neighborhoods with one and two-story multifamily dwellings. The project is generally consistent with the residential development standards and permitted use table, except a deviation from the image corridor standards. This development standard deviation may be approved with the Variance. 3. Compliance with CEQA The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4. Architectural Design The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are 330 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 7 of 13 compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. The modern style utilizes a high- quality design that is compatible with the existing modern style commercial development directly to the north. 5. Site Design The site design of the project including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. 6. Landscape Design Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture and provide adequate relief and screening from Jefferson Street. Variance 2020-0001 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Variance: 1. Consistency with General Plan 331 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 8 of 13 The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium/High Density Residential. The City’s General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including apartment projects. The City’s General Plan policies relating to Medium/High Density Residential encourage a broad range of residential uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU-2 as the project consists of high-quality design that complements and enhances the City. The project design complements an existing high-quality modern style commercial development directly north of the project, and utilizes varying roof lines and wall depths, along with a complementary color palette. • Goal LU-5 as the project provides a broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. The project provides for an apartment project, which creates a different housing type and choice for residents within the City. • Policy LU-5.2 in considering changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. The project is changing from a single-family residential project to a multifamily apartment project to respond to market demand in residential product type to provide residents with apartments. • Goal SC-1 in that it provides a community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents by providing alternative housing types within La Quinta meanwhile providing a project that incorporates open space and common area with a pool for its residents. • Policy ED-1.2 in supporting and assisting in the retention of existing businesses, and the recruitment of new businesses. The apartment project provides additional residents nearby to Highway 111 which will allow for a working base close by to support and assist in the retention of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses. • Goal H-1 in providing housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City’s existing and project population. 332 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 9 of 13 The apartment project of this type provides a diverse type of residential project. • Policy H-1.3 to direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. The housing development was directed to a viable area where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are all available. • Goal H-2 in assisting in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate-income households and Policy H-2.1 which is to increase housing choices for lower and moderate-income households. This project increases the housing choices for moderate income households. The applicant has established this would be a moderate level apartment project, providing more housing choices for moderate income households. 2. Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City’s Zoning Code and the purpose and intent of the Medium Density Residential District. The project satisfies the District’s intent to provide for the development of medium density neighborhoods with one and two-story multifamily dwellings. 3. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4. Surrounding Uses 333 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 10 of 13 As conditioned, approval of the application will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity. The project is surrounded by existing residential developments and is constructed in a way to not impede on the existing homes closest to this project. 5. Special Circumstances There are special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, location and surrounding, which, when the zoning regulations are strictly applied, deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity subject to the same zoning regulated. Special circumstances exist with the parcel shape, location, and surrounding existing buildings and infrastructure that make it difficult to design the building to meet image corridor height and maximum floor standards. The project site is narrow in width, measuring approximately 190 feet within the center of the project site and not varying by much throughout, providing limited development area within the 150-foot image corridor standard. Constructing a one-story apartment project complex under 22 feet creates design problems to establish a medium density multifamily residential project that still meets all other requirements on density, setbacks, required parking, required landscaping, required open space and common areas, and provides a good quality project also suitable to surrounding uses. This proposal is for a new 40-unit apartment residential project proposed to not adhere to the following La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.50.020 Height limits and setbacks near image corridor standards: • All buildings limited to one story, not to exceed twenty- two feet in height within one hundred fifty feet of the edge of right-of-way of general plan designated image corridors (Jefferson Street). All other La Quinta Municipal Code project standards are met. The proposed project is proposed to be two stories and a maximum height of 25 feet. This 25 foot height is less than the 28 foot maximum height of the underlying zone. 334 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 11 of 13 6. Preservation of Property Rights The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zoning district and otherwise denied to the subject property. The adjustment authorized allows for the development of this project as a medium density project within a medium density zone. Without the adjustment, the project is not able to be developed as intended and allows the medium density project to be developed as such. Without the variance exception, other development standards would be significantly impacted, such as landscaping, open space, and parking. 7. No Special Privileges The conditions of approval assure that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privileges which are inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity subject to the same zoning regulations. The adjustment authorized allows for the development of this project as a medium density project within a medium density zone. Without the adjustment, the project is not able to be developed as intended. Without the adjustment, other development standards would be significantly impacted, such as landscaping, open space, and parking. 8. No Land Use Variance The approval does not authorize a land use or activity which is not permitted in the applicable zoning district. Multifamily residential projects are allowed within the Medium Density Residential district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby approves of Specific Plan 2020- 0001 (Specific Plan 2015-0002 Repeal), Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 335 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 12 of 13 (Tentative Parcel Map 37891), Site Development Permit 2020-0001, and Variance 2020-0001, subject to the attached conditions of approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 16th day of February, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: 336 City Council Resolution 2021- Specific Plan 2020-0001 (SP 2015-0002 repeal) Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 (TPM 37891) Site Development Permit 2020-0001 Variance 2020-0001 Jefferson Street Apartments February 16, 2021 Page 13 of 13 ____________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 337 338 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 1 of 17 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Site Development Permit 2020-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 Tentative Parcel Map 37891 (TPM2020-0001) In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The Site Development Permit shall expire on twenty four months after approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080, unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Planning Division • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) 339 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 2 of 17 • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California General Construction Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012- 0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 340 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 3 of 17 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The provision for the funding and perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required; and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs is required. 7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 10. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 11. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in 341 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 4 of 17 conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 12. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – 64 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 128-foot ultimate developed right of way. 13. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 14. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary prior to approval of the improvements dedicating such rights-of- way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 15. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately-owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 17. Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Site Development Permit, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. 18. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 19. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 342 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 5 of 17 20. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 21. The applicant shall remove the No U-Turn sign on Jefferson Street at Vista Grande for southbound left turn traffic to allow residents at this project to make turn arounds. 22. The applicant shall design pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 23. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 24. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid-block street lighting is not required. 25. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 26. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. PARKING and ACCESS POINTS 343 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 6 of 17 27. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking space and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking space design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate accessibility issues. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking spaces and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking space or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible parking stall is required per 8 accessible parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 28. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 29. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Division. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to 344 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 7 of 17 prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Precise Grading Plan 1" = 20' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal D. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off-Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and accessibility requirements. 30. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the “Plans, Notes and Design Guidance” section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 31. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 32. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall 345 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 8 of 17 be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 33. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the developer shall deposit securities in accordance with Engineering Bulletin 09-02 or as approved by the City Engineer. 34. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 35. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 36. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final 346 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 9 of 17 building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 37. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 38. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 39. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. WQMP prepared by an appropriate professional registered in the State of California, and F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 40. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, 347 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 10 of 17 undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 41. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 42. Building pad elevations on the precise grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the preliminary grading plan, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 43. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring-owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 44. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 45. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. DRAINAGE 348 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 11 of 17 46. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Jefferson Apartments project (TPM2020-0001 and SDP2020-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 47. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 10 year storm in the Village area shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 48. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 49. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 50. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 51. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 52. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 53. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls 349 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 12 of 17 onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 54. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 55. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow. 56. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 57. If permitted by the City Engineer, when an applicant proposes discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall execute an indemnification instrument as approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Additionally, the applicant shall pay for all costs of sampling and testing associated with the development’s drainage discharge which may be required under the City’s NPDES Permit or other City or area-wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit, and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this site development permit excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions for meeting these obligations. 58. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. 350 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 13 of 17 B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 59. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 60. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 61. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 62. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 63. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly- maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on-site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement 351 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 14 of 17 thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 64. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 65. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 66. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 67. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Manager for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 18 feet in height, and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 68. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 69. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 70. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 352 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 15 of 17 71. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 72. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 73. Plans shall be prepared to the applicable code at the time of submittal for building permit. As of January 1, 2020, these are the 2019 California Building Codes. 74. Provide Means of Egress Analysis detailing the Exit Access, the Exit and the Exit Discharge, including dimensioning widths and paths of egress travel, door hardware, occupant loads, rated construction, and accessible egress signage. 75. Provide Fire-Resistance Rating for Building Elements Table showing how the proposed construction will comply with Table 601 and 602 for building elements and exterior wall ratings, and Table 705.8 for opening protection requirements. CBC 601, 602 and 705. 76. Provide accessibility matrix demonstrating compliance with Chapter 11A for Covered Multifamily Housing Accessibility. Plans shall also be prepared for both interior and exterior accessibility features as required by Chapter 11A but also Federal Design Standards such as Fair Housing Act. 77. Photovoltaic Requirements. All low-rise residential buildings shall have a photovoltaic (PV) system meeting the minimum qualification requirements as specified in Joint Appendix JA11, with annual electrical output equal to or greater than the dwelling's annual electrical usage as determined by Equation 150.1-C of Section 150.1(c)(14) under the prescriptive approach or Section 150.1(b)(1) under the performance approach compliance method’s. 78. LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING is a building, other than a hotel/motel that is Occupancy Group R-2, multifamily, with three habitable stories or less. 79. The provisions of California Green Building Standards Code outline planning, design and development methods that include environmentally responsible 353 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 16 of 17 site selection, building design, building siting and development to protect, restore and enhance the environmental quality of the site and respect the integrity of adjacent properties, please provide compliance information on plans as applicable. Include planning and design requirements of division 4.1, and the applicable water efficiency and conservations and the material conservation and resource efficiency for exterior items of division 4.3, and 4.4 respectfully, and environmental quality division 4.5. 80. Additional comments may be required based on further information being provided for review. Although this is not a complete review for building permit, these items are being offered to help expedite the review and approval of your project during the permitting stage. 81. Fire Hydrants and Fire Flow: Provide water system plans to show there exists or proposed improvements of fire hydrant(s) capable of delivering the minimum fire flow, per CFC Appendix B Table B105.1 and Table B105.2 as amended by LQMC, within 400 feet to all portions around the proposed structure. Minimum fire hydrant location and spacing shall comply with the CFC and NFPA 24. Reference 2016 California Fire Code (CFC) 507.5.1. a. Transportation Hydrants: Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, fire hydrants shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 1,000 feet to provide for transportation hazards. (CFC Table C102.1 ft nt c.) 82. Fire Department Access: Access roads shall be provided to within 150 feet to all portions of all buildings and shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24-feet exclusive of curb-side parking, bike lanes and other roadway features. The construction of the access roads shall be all weather and capable of sustaining 40,000 lbs. over two axles for areas of residential development and 60,000 lbs. over two axels for commercial developments. Ref. CFC 503.1.1 and 503.2.1 as amended by the City of La Quinta. a. Fire Lane marking: Identification and marking of fire lanes, including curb details and signage shall be in compliance with Riverside County Fire Department Standards. 83. Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Ref. CFC 503.4.1 84. Phased Construction Access: If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access for fire protection prior to any construction. Ref. CFC 503.1 354 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SDP2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 17 of 17 85. Fire Sprinkler System: All Residential buildings, and buildings with an area of 3,600 square feet or larger are required to have an approved Automatic Fire Sprinkler System installed by the CA Building and Fire Codes. System type and design requirements shall be in compliance with applicable codes and NFPA standards. 86. Fire Alarm and Detection System: A water flow monitoring fire alarm system will be required. Ref. CFC 903.4, CFC 907.2 and NFPA 72 7. 87. Knox Box and Gate Access: Buildings shall be provided with a Knox Box for service/utility areas. The Knox Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. All gates shall be provided with Knox access. Electronically operated gates shall be provided with Knox key devices and automatic sensors for access. Ref. CFC 506.1 88. Addressing: A building and unit numbering plan shall be submitted for review by Building and Fire. *This may be the sample 4’x4’ Facility Map noted in comment 2.b. **May be addressed during construction permitting. These comments are preliminary and further review will occur upon receipt of construction plans. Additional requirements may be required based upon the adopted codes at the time of submittal. PUBLIC SERVICES 89. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 90. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 91. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 92. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 355 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 1 of 14 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Parcel Map. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Parcel Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the “Subdivision Map Act”), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (“LQMC”). 3. The Tentative Parcel Map shall expire thirty six months after approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 13.12.150. An extension of time may be requested pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 13.12.150. 4. Tentative Parcel Map 2020-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2020-0001 Site Development Permit 2020-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 5. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Planning Division • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) 356 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 2 of 14 • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 6. Coverage under the State of California General Construction Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012- 0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 357 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 3 of 14 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The provision for the funding and perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required; and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs is required. 8. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 11. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 12. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in 358 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 4 of 14 conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 13. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – 64 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 128-foot ultimate developed right of way. 14. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 15. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map are necessary prior to approval of the improvements dedicating such rights-of-way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 16. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately-owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes. 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 18. Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Parcel Map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map. 19. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 20. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAPS 21. Prior to the City’s approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate 359 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 5 of 14 mylars of the Final Map. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 23. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 24. The applicant shall remove the No U-Turn sign on Jefferson Street at Vista Grande for southbound left turn traffic to allow residents at this project to make turn arounds. 25. The applicant shall design pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 26. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 27. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid-block street lighting is not required. 360 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 6 of 14 28. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 29. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. PARKING and ACCESS POINTS 30. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking space and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking space design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate accessibility issues. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking spaces and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking space or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible parking stall is required per 8 accessible parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 31. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of 361 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 7 of 14 qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 32. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Division. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Precise Grading Plan 1" = 20' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal D. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off-Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and accessibility requirements. 33. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the “Plans, Notes and Design Guidance” section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 362 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 8 of 14 34. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 35. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. GRADING 36. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 37. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 38. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. WQMP prepared by an appropriate professional registered in the State of California, and F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. 363 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 9 of 14 All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 39. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 40. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 41. Building pad elevations on the precise grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the preliminary grading plan, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 42. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring-owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 43. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance 364 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 10 of 14 review. 44. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. DRAINAGE 45. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Jefferson Apartments project (TPM2020-0001 and SDP2020-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 46. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 10 year storm in the Village area shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 47. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 48. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 49. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 365 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 11 of 14 50. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 51. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 52. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 53. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 54. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow. 55. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 56. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit 366 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 12 of 14 Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 57. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 58. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 59. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 60. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 61. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly- maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on-site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 367 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 13 of 14 62. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 63. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 64. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 65. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Manager for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 18 feet in height, and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 66. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 67. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 68. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 69. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 368 RESOLUTION 2021- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TPM2020-0001 JEFFERSON APARTMENTS FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Page 14 of 14 70. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. PUBLIC SERVICES 71. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 72. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 73. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 74. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 369 370 PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NUMBERS: MASTER PROJECT 2020-0001 (SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0001, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-0001, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2020-0001, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2020-0001, AND VARIANCE 2020-0001) APPLICANT: JIM SNELLENBEGER PROPERTY OWNER: JIM SNELLENBEGER AND CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUESTS: ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AND VARIANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 40-UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND PALM CIRCLE DRIVE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATION: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL; EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING SOUTH: FLOODPLAIN; FLOODPLAIN EAST: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL WEST: JEFFERSON ST, PARKS AND RECREATION, GOLF COURSE; EXISTING JEFFERSON STREET, AND GOLF COURSE ATTACHMENT 1 371 372 ATTACHMENT 2 373 374 375ATTACHMENT 3 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 1 The Villas at Indian Springs Specific Plan Prepared for the City of La Quinta, California April 2015 – REVISED AUGUST/DECEMBER 2015 ATTACHMENT 4 435 436 2 LIST OF CONSULTANTS Planner Global Development, Inc. 75161 Sago Ln Palm Desert, CA 92210 760-834-8278 Architect GLS Architecture Group, Inc. 74991 Joni Dr. #9 Palm Desert, CA 92260 760-340-3528 Landscape Architect Lush & Efficient Landscape Design 52293 Avendia Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 760-835-6358 Civil Engineer Watson Engineering 50200 Monroe St. Indio, CA 92201 760-275-1553 Soil Engineer Sladden Engineering 45090 Golf Center Parkway, Suite F Indio, CA 92201 760-863-0713 437 3 City Officials Acknowledgement Community Development Director: Les Johnson Public Works Director: Tim Jonasson Principal Planner: Wally Nesbit Principal Engineers: Bryan McKinney Ed Wimmer 438 4 Table of Contents 1. Introduction & Background Page 5 2. Specific Plan Land Use Page 5 3. Siting Standards Page 6 4. Architectural Design Guidelines Page 6 5. Engineering & Improvements Page 7 6. Landscape Architectural Guidelines Page 8 7. Standards for the Conservation, Development, and Utilization of Natural Resources Page 8 8. Implementation Programs & Measures Page 9 9. Relationship to the General Plan Page 9 10. Specific Plan Consistency With General Plan Page 10 List of Illustrations  Global Development Specific Plan Delineation (Page 19)  Ownership Map (Page 20 & 21)  Conceptual Land Plan (Page 22)  Tentative Tract Map Exhibit (Page 23)  Architectural Plans (Pages 24-26)  Entry Landscape (Page 27)  Retention Landscape (Page 28)  Front Yard Landscape (Page 29) 439 440 5 1. Introduction & Background: The Specific Plan covers 3.22 net acres of land on the eastern edge of The City of La Quinta. The current General Plan for the area is: Medium/High Density Residential. The Specific Plan guidelines are intended for Medium Density Residential. Global Development, LLC. owns 2.34 acres and the City of La Quinta owns 0.88 acres, Global Development is in contract with the City of La Quinta to buy their land. The land the City of La Quinta owns included nine developed lots purchased using redevelopment funds in order to widen Jefferson Street; the homes on those lots were subsequently demolished and new right-of-way was established, with the remainder of the lots being retained by the City. The 2.34 acres Global Development owns was an old golf course fairway that was redesigned and left out of its original plan. 2. Specific Plan Land Use: Introduction. The 2035 La Quinta General Plan designates the site land use as Medium/High Density Residential. The site is currently zoned for Golf Course and Low Density Residential, and requires a zone change to be consistent with the City General Plan Land Use. As such, a zoning designation of Medium Density Residential has been proposed. The majority of the land in the Specific Plan is undeveloped requiring new infrastructure including street, drainage, utility systems, grading of the topography and other infrastructure. The land in the Specific Plan is located on the eastern edge of the City of La Quinta, with several utility districts governing various aspects of public utility infrastructure. a. Residential Density. The Specific Plan and associated tract map propose a 16- lot development on 3.22 acres, establishing a residentyial density of 4.97 units/acre. The project was revised from 15 lots in December 2015 based on an allowance from CVWD to discharge project drainage into the Whitewater Channel, which allowed adding 1 lot to replace the original retention basin. b. Conceptual Development Illustrations. The residential project area site, landscaping and unit plans are provided for reference in this document, as noted in the List of Illustrations on Page 4. These plans are generally intended to be representative of the project layout, density and design concept, but are not intended to establish specific detailed plans for construction. Detailed design components of the project will vary as the development process continues. 441 6 3. Siting Standards: a. Single Family Lot Standards. Each lot size varies due to irregularly shaped lots. The ninimum lot size shall be 6000 sq. ft. b. Single Family Siting Standards. The Standards listed below are minimum, except when they refer to a maximum allowed item. The architectural theme should be compatible and related to the Single Family Themes.  Maximum Height: 17 feet/One story  Front yard setback: 15 feet  Side yard setback: 5 feet  Rear yard setback: 10 feet  Architectural projection: 2 feet into front or rear setback  A/C setbacks: 3.5 feet from any property line 4. Architectural Design Guidelines: a. Roofing. All plans will have two elevations, an A elevation and a B elevation. All A elevations will have S concrete tile roofs; All B elevations will have flat concrete tile roofs. All roofing colors will be show on the color chart. b. Window Trim. All elevations will have window trim around the windows on front elevations. c. Rock Veneer. All A elevations will have rock veneer on front elevation. d. Painted Pop Outs. All B elevations will have paint areas on the front elevation. e. Wood Grain Metal Garage Doors. All plans will have wood grain metal doors. f. Courtyard. All plan 3’s will have courtyards. g. Drive Ways & Walkways. All driveway & walkways are to be gray concrete. h. Block Walls. All courtyard walls are to be plastered to match home, all other walls to be tan precision block. i. Wrought Iron Fencing. Wrought iron fencing to be used around retention area will be relocated from Jefferson side of project after removal for the new block wall. 442 7 5. Engineering & Improvements: Introduction. The majority of the area within the Specific Plan is undeveloped requiring new infrastructure including a private street, underground utility systems, grading of the topography and other infrastructure. The Specific Plan is located on the easterly edge of the City of La Quinta, with several utility districts governing various aspects of public utility infrastructure. The planned area is bounded by Jefferson St., Palm Circle Dr., Westward Isle Homes and the wash. The overall capacity and existing condition of this public infrastructure is adequate to serve the planned uses, however, some improvements and upgrading of existing utilities are necessary. This section establishes standards and policies for the design and installation of the new-engineered infrastructure for the complete build-out of the plan and establishes the proper framework necessary for future development. a. Street Design Standards. The residential street within the Specific Plan is designed to be private and maintained by its own Home Owners Association. This street will be designed in accordance with the street sections provided in the plan. Any deviations from these standards will require review and approval by the city of La Quinta. b. Topography & Grading. The area covered by the Specific Plan contains various topographic and drainage features that require specific guidelines in order to ensure conformance with local agency requirements as minimal impact to natural topography. The finished elevations within the plan range from approximately 60-64 feet above mean sea level.  Flood Elevation Requirements. Development within the Specific Plan is required to comply with the City of La Quinta flood elevation standards. The building pads of all occupied structures will be elevated to a minimum of 60 feet above mean sea level with the finished floor being a minimum of 6 inches above the building pad.  Grading & Drainage. The drainage systems within the plan area are similar to most new developments. Lots, streets, and landscaped areas will be graded to convey runoff to new inlets within the development, which will then transport the storm water through underground piping to the retention basin.  Storm Water Treatment. The development within the Specific Plan is required to prepare and summit project-specific Storm water Management Plans (SWMP) to determine and implement storm water runoff treatment measures to reduce potential impacts from sediment-laden runoff and other pollutants. 443 8 c. Infrastructure & Utilities. The Specific Plan requires new public and privately maintained utility infrastructure to serve the uses. The existing site is primarily undeveloped land; therefore, almost no existing infrastructure resides with in the development envelope.  Sanitary Sewer. Sanitary sewerage in the area is operated by CVWD. Conventional underground sewer system within the public street that will connect to the existing system within Jefferson St. The developer will leave a sewer stub out for future use of Westward Isle H.O.A.  Water Supply & Service. Water service for the new development is serviced by CVWD. The development has gone through a CVWD review and CVWD has concluded that there is adequate water supply.  Energy. So. Cal Gas & IID provides energy and natural gas service to the Specific Plan area. Existing natural gas and electric infrastructure exist within the surrounding public streets. 6. Landscape Architectural Guidelines: a. Introduction and Landscape Concept. The Landscape must respond to the significant site climate issues including extreme drought, high winds and hot desert climates. The majority of the plant material must be low water use, drought tolerant or native to the desert. We will not be installing any grass due to the issues the state of California is currently experiencing. Every home and the surrounding areas will consist of desert landscape. The irrigation system on site will be automatic, underground, and state of the art systems using the latest water conservation available. Drip irrigation will be used to minimize any drought concerning issues. 7. Standards for the Conservation, Development, and Utilization of Natural Resources: a. Existing Natural Resources. There are no Natural Resources on this land, originally there were homes on 1/3 of the land and then golf course on 2/3’s of the remaining land. All the land has been disturbed from its original state. b. Development. The development of this Specific Plan will be built by private funds and will not require any city financing. c. Conservation. Due to the issues the state of California is currently experiencing the irrigation system on site will be automatic, underground, and state of the art systems using the latest water conservation technologies available, The majority of the plant material must be low water use, drought 444 9 tolerant or native to the desert. Drip irrigation will be used to minimize any drought concerning issues. 8. Implementation Programs & Measures: a. Development Phasing. The development will have three phases, Phase 1 (all off sites & lots 12-15), Phase 2 (lots1-4) & Phase 3 (lots 5-11). b. Review and Approval Process. The Specific Plan, Zone Change, Tentative Map and Site Development Permit applications will be reviewed conjunctively, with Planning Commission review and a recommendation to the City Council for their decision. After approval, the Community Development Director will have the authority to approve any minor changes to the Specific Plan within the context and guidelines contained within this document and the City’s guiding General Plan policies. 9. Relationship to the General Plan: a. Land Use and Zoning Consistency. The General Plan land use designation of the property is Medium/High Density Residential, which allows single and multi-family residential up to a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre. The zoning designation of the property is Low Density Residential (RL) and Golf Course (GC). The proposed project is inconsistent with the current zoning for golf course use, as well as the proposed lot size and density. Based on initial review, it would appear the project is consistent with the medium Density (RM) zoning district, which allows a density range between 4 and 8 dwelling units per acre. This district would accommodate the proposed minimum lot size 6,000 square feet, at the proposed density of 4.97 units/acre. b. Development: House Plans: Plan 1- 1,815 sq. Plan 2- 1,930 sq. Plan 3-2,305 sq. 2 different Elevations each plan 445 10 Specific Plan Consistency With La Quinta General Plan Global Development would like to develop a well-planned and desirable neighborhood that meets the communities’ vision in the highest quality for which they are known. The following shows the relationship between our Specific Plan and project to the City of La Quinta’s General Plan. Goals, Policies, and Programs: Community Development Land Use Goal LU-1 Policy LU-1.1a We are consistent with all Land Maps and Zoning Maps, consistent with the Zoning Designation Consistency Matrix. Policy LU-1.2 All land use decisions are consistent with the applicable General Plan policies. We have hosted three meetings with the homeowners in the surrounding areas and the majority of them support and approve the project. Livable Communities Goal SC-1 Policy SC-1.2a Conservation of Natural Resources This project has implemented the conservation programs including CVWD Urban Management Plan, City of La Quinta’s Landscape Ordinance, Cal Green codes, and Federal Water Saving programs. Policy SC-1.3 Storm Water Runoff and Water Quality Protection We have submitted a storm water run off and water quality protection plan that covers all necessary requirements. Policy SC-1.4 Air Quality We have two certified officers within the company that have received Certificates of Completion for the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control class supplied by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. They will be 446 11 monitoring the site at all times to make sure we are in complete compliance to their requirements. Lic. # CV1406-000763-836 Lic. # CV1406-000788-861  Policy SC-1.5a Energy Resource This project is in compliance with the California Efficiency Standards. (Title 24 in Building Codes)  Policy SC-1.5c Pedestrian Connections We are going to be providing a gate connecting the community to the new CV Link that will be developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail.  Policy SC-1.6b We are going to be providing a gate connecting the community to the new CV Link that will be developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail.  Policy SC-1.6c We are going to be providing a gate connecting the community to the new CV Link that will be developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail.  Policy SC-1.7a This land is part of a Redevelopment Project that the City did to widen Jefferson St. We believe and have been told that the residential development fits the zoning ordinance.  Policy SC-1.8b We are going to be providing a gate that will connect the community to the new CV Link being developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail. Economic Development Goal ED-1  Policy ED-1.1a This project maintains a balance of land use designations to address economic needs. It utilizes a vacant and underutilized area of land to increase the new home inventory that will address market needs. 447 12  Policy ED-1.3a This project is pedestrian-friendly. It will interconnect with the CV Link and is within walking distance of golf, restaurants, Home Depot, Costco, and many other retail stores.  Policy ED-1.6 This project will bring revenue to the City of La Quinta by the purchasing of said land from the city. We have established a comprehensive program to enforce all payments of taxes and dues. Parks, Recreation and Trails Goal PR-1  Policy PR-1.3 This project will bring revenue to the City of La Quinta by the purchasing of said land from the city. We have established a comprehensive program to enforce all payments of taxes and dues.  Policy PR-1.5a We are going to be providing a gate that will connect the community to the new CV Link being developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail.  Policy PR-1.5c We are going to be providing a gate connecting the community to the new CV Link that will be developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail.  Policy PR-1.8 We are going to be providing a gate that will connect the community to the new CV Link being developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail.  Policy PR-1.8a This project is within walking distance from Indian Springs Golf Course and many other fitness facilities such as gyms and wellness centers. Housing Goal H-1  Policy H-1.2a 448 13 This project will take underutilized, vacant land and increase the capacity for housing.  Policy H-1.2b This project consists of smaller lots that create potential for first-time homeowners, small families and seniors to purchase a home. The project is a small infill site that we are asking for flexible development standard allowances specific to small lots that are usually reserved for affordable projects. It will have smaller lots but still be considered single-family detached homes.  Policy H-1.4 This project will create new affordable homes in the city of La Quinta. Goal H-2  Policy H-2.1 This Project will increase the moderate housing choices in the city of La Quinta.  Policy H-2.3 Program H-2.3j Our company would like to look at this program with the city and see if it can help with the moderate-income households. Program H-6.5d To help with the Landscape Water Management Plan our company plans to use landscape that must respond to the significant site climate issues including extreme drought, high winds and hot desert climates. The majority of the plant material must be low water use, drought tolerant or native to the desert. We will not be installing any grass due to the issues the state of California is currently experiencing. Every home and the surrounding areas will consist of desert landscape. The irrigation system on site will be automatic, underground, and state of the art systems using the latest water conservation available. Drip irrigation will be used to minimize any drought concerning issues. Natural Resources Air Quality  Policy AQ-1.1 We have two certified officers here in the company that have received Certificates of Completion for the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control class supplied by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. They will be 449 14 monitoring at all times to make sure we are in complete compliance to their requirements. Lic. # CV1406-000763-836 and Lic. # CV1406-000788-861  Policy AQ-1.1a Our project will be monitored, managed and all SCAQMD rules will be enforced.  Policy AQ-1.3 This project is pedestrian-friendly. It will interconnect with the CV Link and is within walking distance of golf, restaurants, Home Depot, Costco, and many other retail stores.  Policy AQ-1.3e We are going to be providing a gate connecting the community to the new CV Link that will be developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail.  Policy AQ-1.3g This development is within walking distance from public parks, schools, golf courses, and commercial businesses.  Policy AQ-1.5a Our project will be monitored, managed and all SCAQMD rules will be enforced.  Policy AQ-1.5b PM10 Plan was submitted to the city of La Quinta.  Policy AQ-1.6 PM10 Plan was submitted to the city of La Quinta. Energy and Mineral Resources Goal EM-1  Policy EM-1.1 This project consists of homes that have a Title 24 Report that mandates conservations of energy resources. Biological Resources Goal BIO-1  Policy BIO-1.1 450 15 This project will pay the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation fee when appropriate before building permits are paid.  Policy BIO-1.2a Program BIO-1.2a This program has had a qualified biologist on the property to do a biological resource survey. Cultural Resources Goal CUL-1  Policy CUL-1.1 This project has had a qualified archeologist on site to study and report any archaeological, historic, and paleontological resources found.  Policy CUL-1.4b A geotechnical analysis has been completed including soil borings. Water Resources Goal WR-1  Policy WR-1.1 Our projects landscape will respond to the significant site climate issues including extreme drought, high winds and hot desert climates. The majority of the plant material must be low water use, drought tolerant or native to the desert. We will not be installing any grass due to the issues the state of California is currently experiencing. Every home and the surrounding areas will consist of desert landscape. The irrigation system on site will be automatic, underground, and state of the art systems using the latest water conservation available. Drip irrigation will be used to minimize any drought concerning issues.  Policy WR-1.2 Our company will pay, when necessary, the appropriate recharge aquifer fee to CVWD.  Policy WR-1.4 Our project has a set Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for storm water pollution.  Policy WR-1.4c This project has an onsite retention basin to provide added recharge to the aquifer. 451 16 Open Space and Conservation Goals OS-1 Policy OS-1.2c We are going to be providing a gate that will connect the community to the new CV Link being developed in the near future so that our homeowners can access the trail. Environmental Hazards: Noise Goals N-1 Policy N-1.2 This project has submitted a noise study in conjunction with the first Planning Department Application. Policy N-1.5 This project has submitted a noise study in conjunction with the first Planning Department Application. Soils and Geology Goals GEO-1 Policy GEO-1.2 This project has submitted a Geotechnical Report. Flooding and Hydrology Goals FH-1 Policy FH-1.3a This project has an onsite Retention/Detention Basin that is capable of managing 100-year storm water flows. Hazardous Materials Goals HAZ-1 Policy HAZ-1.1 452 17 This project will have no hazardous materials onsite. Public Infrastructures and Services: Emergency Services Goals ES-1  Policy ES-1.1a This project will pay Development Impact Fees that will help develop future Fire Stations and facilities.  Policy ES-1.2 We will be submitting a Fire Sprinkler Plan to the Fire Department for this project. We will be submitting street plans to the Fire Department to assure that the projects access and design provides maximum fire and life safety.  Policy ES-1.6 This project will be routed to the Police Department to assure that the project access and design provide for defensible space and maximum crime prevention while maintaining City design standards and codes. Water, Sewer and other Utilities Goals UTL 1.1  Policy UTL 1.1 This project has submitted plans to CVWD for available water. The water is available in the street next to the project.  Policy UTL 1.1b The Landscape must respond to the significant site climate issues including extreme drought, high winds and hot desert climates. The majority of the plant material must be low water use, drought tolerant or native to the desert. We will not be installing any grass due to the issues the state of California is currently experiencing. Every home and the surrounding areas will consist of desert landscape. The irrigation system on site will be automatic, underground, and state of the art systems using the latest water conservation available. Drip irrigation will be used to minimize any drought concerning issues.  Policy UTL 1.1b 2 This project has coordinated a plan between the Fire Department and CVWD to ensure adequate water supplies for fire suppression. 453 18 Policy UTL 1.2b The Landscape must respond to the significant site climate issues including extreme drought, high winds and hot desert climates. The majority of the plant material must be low water use, drought tolerant or native to the desert. We will not be installing any grass due to the issues the state of California is currently experiencing. Every home and the surrounding areas will consist of desert landscape. The irrigation system on site will be automatic, underground, and state of the art systems using the latest water conservation available. Drip irrigation will be used to minimize any drought concerning issues. Policy UTL 2.1 This project is going to bring sewer to the site and connect to the sanitary sewer service. The sewer is across Jefferson St. and will be a great expense to get it to the project. Our project will allow the existing project without sewer to hook in at no cost to them. This should encourage the elimination of the pre existing projects septic system. Public Facilities Goals PF-1 Policy PF 1.3a This project will be paying all required Development Impact Fees. Policy PF 1.6b This project will be paying all required School Impact Fees. 454 19 455 20 456 21 457 22 458 23 459 24 460 25 461 26 462 27 463 28 464 29 465 466 1/13/2021 9.50.020 Height limits and setbacks near image corridors. qcode.us/codes/laquinta/view.php?topic=9-9_50-9_50_020&frames=on 1/1 La Quinta Municipal Code Up Previous Next Main Search Print No Frames Title 9 ZONING Chapter 9.50 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9.50.020 Height limits and setbacks near image corridors. In order to facilitate noise screening for residents and preserve visual openness, it is necessary to limit building heights for residential development. Therefore, notwithstanding the height standards set forth elsewhere in this code, additional height limitations shall apply to buildings within one hundred fifty feet of the edge of right-of-way of the following general plan-designated image corridors: A. Image Corridors: All buildings limited to one story, not to exceed twenty-two feet in height. B. Rear yard setbacks for residential units abutting the image corridors shall be a minimum of twenty-five feet. The RVL development standard shall be required as specified in Section 9.30.020. (Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 341 § 1, 2000; Ord. 325 § 1, 1998; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) View the mobile version. ATTACHMENT 5 467 Exhibit II-4 City of La Quinta General Plan Image Corridors La Quinta, California City Boundary Source: City of La Quinta August 2011 Sphere of Influence Image Corridors Roads Legend 07.02.12ATTACHMENT 6 468 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 7 469 470 471 472 Attachment 1 473 474 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 1 NOVEMBER 23, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION SPECIAL MINUTES WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2020 CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Financial Advisory Commission (Commission) was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chairperson Mills. This meeting was held by teleconference pursuant to Executive orders N-25-20, N- 29-20, N-33-20, and N-35-20, executed by the Governor of California in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Commissioners Batavick, Hoffner, Hunter, Rosen, Twohey, Way and Chairperson Mills ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: City Clerk Radeva, Financial Services Analyst Hallick, Finance Director Romero, Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney, Management Analyst Mignogna, and Assistant Construction Manager Ayon PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Hunter led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA – None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA – Confirmed ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS – None BUSINESS SESSION 1.RECOMMEND APPROPRIATION OF ADDITIONAL MEASURE G FUNDING FOR THE SILVERROCK PARK VENUE PROJECT NO. 2016-08 AND SILVERROCK RETENTION BASIN SOIL STABILIZATION PROJECT NO. 2020-07 (Project) REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 28 475 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 2 NOVEMBER 23, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING Management Analyst Mignogna, Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney, and Assistant Construction Manager Ayon presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. The Commission and staff discussed proposed phase II improvements for the Project including enhancement options, additional funding options, soft costs, and anticipated timeline for presenting to Council for review and consideration. Commissioner Mills, Rosen, and Way shared their experience and what was reviewed during the subcommittee’s recent site meetings. Further discussion followed on the SilverRock Retention Basin Soil Stabilization Project design process and funding. Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Twohey/Rosen to recommend Council approval of additional Measure G funding appropriation, in the amount of $290,000, for the SilverRock Park Venue Project No. 2016-08 and $10,000 for the SilverRock Retention Basin Soil Stabilization Project No. 2020-07. Motion passed unanimously. STUDY SESSION – None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 YEAR-END BUDGET REPORT AMENDMENT Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Finance Director Romero mentioned that the fiscal year 2019/20 year-end budget report amendment was presented to Council on November 17, 2020. COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS – None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Hunter/Hoffner to adjourn this meeting at 4:31 p.m. Motion passed unanimously Respectfully submitted, Jessica Delgado, Management Assistant City of La Quinta, California Digitally signed by Jessica Delgado DN: cn=Jessica Delgado, o=City of La Quinta, ou=Finance, email=jdelgado@laquintaca.gov, c=US Date: 2021.02.11 07:58:18 -08'00' 476 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 1 DECEMBER 2, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION SPECIAL MINUTES WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2020 CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Financial Advisory Commission (Commission) was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chairperson Mills. This meeting was held by teleconference pursuant to Executive orders N-25-20, N- 29-20, N-33-20, and N-35-20, executed by the Governor of California in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Commissioners Batavick, Hoffner, Hunter, Rosen, Twohey, Way and Chairperson Mills ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Management Assistant Delgado, Financial Services Analyst Hallick, Finance Director Romero, Design and Development Director Castro, Planning Manager Flores PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Way led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA – None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA – Confirmed ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – None CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1. APPROVE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES DATED NOVEMBER 4, 2020 2. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Twohey/Hoffner to approve the Consent Calendar, as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 29 477 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 2 DECEMBER 2, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPOINT TWO FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSIONERS TO SERVE ON THE FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 OPERATING BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Finance Director Romero explained the budget timeline and the list of Commissioners who assisted with this subcommittee in the past. Commissioners Hunter and Rosen expressed their willingness to serve on the fiscal year 2021/22 operating budget subcommittee. Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Hoffner/Way to appoint Commissioners Hunter and Rosen to serve on the fiscal year 2021/22 operating budget subcommittee. Motion passed unanimously. 2. APPOINT TWO FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSIONERS TO SERVE ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 THROUGH 2025/26 SUBCOMMITTEE Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Finance Director Romero explained the subcommittee’s scope of purview and anticipated timeline, and the list of Commissioners who assisted with this subcommittee in the past. Commissioners Batavick and Hoffner expressed their willingness to serve on the CIP Fiscal Year 2021/22 through 2025/26 subcommittee. Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Rosen/Hunter to appoint Commissioner Batavick and Hoffner to serve on the CIP fiscal year 2021/22 through 2025/26 subcommittee. Motion passed unanimously 3. APPOINT TWO FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSIONERS TO REVIEW THE CITY’S OUTSTANDING PENSION OBLIGATION Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Finance Director Romero explained the importance and scope of the review for this subcommittee. Commissioners Twohey and Way expressed their willingness to assist with the review of the City’s outstanding pension obligation. Motion – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Rosen/Hoffner to appoint Commissioner Twohey and Way to assist with the review the City’s Outstanding Pension Obligation. Motion passed unanimously. 478 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 3 DECEMBER 2, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS THE HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR (Corridor) PLAN (Plan) AND FORM-BASED CODE ZONING PROJECT NO. 2019-05 (Project) Finance Director Romero, Design and Development Director Castro, and Planning Manager Flores presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Staff provided the background history for the Plan and an overview of the Plan discussion that occurred at a Joint Council and Planning Commission meeting held on November 10, 2020. The Commission and staff discussed the next steps for the Plan and Project, integration of the CV link with the Plan, anticipated timeline for a form-based code demonstration project along the Corridor and future considerations by the City Council, the Project’s overall scope of work, and budgeted consultant (GHD Inc.) costs related to the Project. Staff said the City continues to do outreach with property owners for the Plan and Project. The Commission expressed general support of these initial stages for the Plan and Project. 2. REVIEW AND DISCUSS 10-YEAR FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND Finance Director Romero and Financial Services Analyst Hallick presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. The Commission and staff discussed the basis of the 10-year financial projection actuals, Measure G and General Fund allocations, operating expenses and Reserve Fund balance, capital expense General Fund contributions set aside for road improvements, and carryovers. The Commission suggested reviewing the 10-year projections again in four months. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1.FINANCE DEPARTMENT CURRENT AND FUTURE INITIATIVES Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Finance Director Romero announced effective December 7, 2020, that the City recruited Jesse Batres as an Account Technician who will be primarily responsible for accounts payables in the Finance Department. 2. COMMUNITY WORKSHOP (Workshop) IN JANUARY 2021 479 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES 4 DECEMBER 2, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING Finance Director Romero presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. Staff and Chairperson Mills encouraged all Commissioners to attend the virtual Workshop scheduled to take place on Saturday, January 16, 2021. Finance Director Romero said staff would send the Commission a calendar invite for the Workshop. COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS Chairperson Mills suggested having a joint meeting in the future between the previous selected SilverRock Venue Ad-hoc Committee, Council, and possibly the Commission as well. Commissioner Hoffner inquired the start date for the future meetings of the pending Commission’s Short-Term Vacation Rental Program (STVRP) subcommittee for fiscal impact review and the Library Development Impact Fee Fund Loan subcommittee. Staff said that an update for both the STVRP subcommittee and Library Development Impact Fee Fund Loan subcommittee would be provided to the Commission at a later date; and noted the final meeting for the current 15-member STVRP Ad-hoc Committee was scheduled for Thursday, December 3, where all recommendations where anticipated to be presented. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Rosen/Hunter to adjourn this meeting at 5:50 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Jessica Delgado, Management Assistant City of La Quinta, California Digitally signed by Jessica Delgado DN: cn=Jessica Delgado, o=City of La Quinta, ou=Finance, email=jdelgado@laquintaca.gov, c=US Date: 2021.02.11 08:08:01 -08'00' 480 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 30 481 482 Palm Springs Airport Commission Report – January 20, 2021 Teleconference Meeting Budget and Finance Report – The December financial summary indicates that the airport is down 50.66% over previous year which is to be anticipated due to COVID 19. As the pandemic continues of the new services have either been cancelled or scaled back. We have to remember that when the projections were initially made were considered Purple and not Red. Some of the changes have been: Air Canada delayed until April 12th, Alaska flights to San Jose and Reno stopped until February 11, Boutique terminates March 1, Jet Blue has delayed Fort Lauderdale until March 7, West Jet has delayed much of their services until March 5. It will continue changing on a weekly basis until the vaccines are able to create more consumer confidence as well as public safety. On December 27th the Corona Virus Response & Relief Appropriation Act announced that PSP could qualify for up to $4.4 million for janitorial, cleaning & sanitizing, personnel and operations and an additional $280,000 for concession relief. September 30 is the deadline to commit and the airport would have up to 4 years to use it. Discussion and Action Report:  Committee Chairman Report – Chairman Alison Jones showcased images the new public art installation of 8 benches and trash bins that are by the airport entrance. The City of Palm Springs Art Commission did an excellent job in capturing the whimsey of the destination and showcases that the Coachella Valley is an art destination as well. The Airport Commission was so impressed, a request was made for consideration of more benches and trash bins throughout the airport area. The benches have been paid for, installed and cared for by the City of Palm Springs. (Attached to this report is a pdf of the colorful benches)  City Manager report – David Ready is seeking proposals for a consultant to work with the Deputy Director of Tourism to develop a marketing and communications plan.  Executive Director Report – Ulises Aguirre notes that Victoria Carpenter a former Coachella Valley Water District Finance Director has been hired as the new Finance Director. She will make her first report at the February meeting. Also Palm Springs Airport has been nominated as one of the nation’s Top Ten Best Small Airports.  RFP Scope of Work – Marketing & Communications Plan ‐ This information was covered by my previous Marketing Committee Report. It revolves around the need for an effective marketing plan to make Coachella Valley residents and a small reach outside our valley aware of the frequency of flights to/from PSP with a budget of $40,000. Airport Marketing Director, Daniel Meier (formally from Frontier Airlines) has been given the task to speak to other similar size airports, determine what was effective for them, and compare their budgets in order for us to have a better understanding of what is truly required to be successful in developing year‐ round traffic. Daniel anticipates at least 4 companies will send in an RFP. These will be evaluated by City of Palm Springs, PSP Marketing Director Daniel Meier, Executive Director Ulises Aguirre, and most likely Patricia Breslin, Head of Airport Marketing Committee, and Alison Jones, Chairman of PSP Airport Commission. Next Airport Commission meeting is scheduled for February 17 16 at 5:30 pm by Teleconference. Sincerely, Kathleen Hughes 483 AIRPORT BENCHES 484 Benches and Waste Receptacles Painting 485 Susan Gresto Mark Johnson Gavin Dick 486 James Galluci Susan Gresto James Galluci 487 Mark Johnson James Gallucci Mark Johnson Mark Johnson James Gallucci Gavin Dick 488 POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 16, 2021 02/16/2021 1 City Council February 16, 2021 City Council February 16, 2021 Closed Session In Progress 1 2 02/16/2021 2 Pledge of Allegiance Remembering Agustin Arellano o 3 4 02/16/2021 3 City Council Meeting February 16, 2021 B1 – Public Safety Camera System (PSCS) Policies and Procedures 5 6 02/16/2021 4 Background •September 2016 ‐City Council established an Ad Hoc Committee •The past four years, the Committee has: –Hosted 28 community meetings, 2 focus groups, 2 community surveys –Conducted a 90‐day pilot program, –Presented 10 separate times to Council, –Hired a firm to design a city‐wide system, –Funded the program as part of the 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program •As part of the PSCS, Council directed staff to create policies and procedures to govern system and incorporate public input Process •January 15, 2019 –First draft presented to Council, reviewed by City’s insurance carrier and City Attorney •June 18, 2019 –Staff held 22 community meetings during the 90‐Day Pilot Program •December 3, 2019 –Second draft presented to Council based on public comment and reviewed by City Attorney •September 15, 2020 – Policies and Procedures provided to Council as part of the PSCS Update •February 16, 2021 – Request Council to review and approve latest version of the Policies and Procedures 7 8 02/16/2021 5 PSCS Policies and Procedures •Sets clear rules regarding: –How system will be used –Who has access –What functions are authorized –Approval process to add/change functions not currently approved –Use of recorded images for evidentiary purposes Safeguards and Protections •Specific policies to: –Protect First and Fourth Amendment rights –Prohibits use of PSCS to target/observe individuals based solely on their race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability or other classifications protected by law. –Audio cannot be used in conjunction with PSCS unless appropriate court orders are obtained –Black‐out technology will be applied to conceal private property 9 10 02/16/2021 6 Safeguards and Protections •Only authorized personnel will have access to the PSCS •Integration with other technology will require Council approval and will include one study session and one public hearing before the technology is added •All media will be stored on a dedicated server in a secured area •Check and balances have been established to protect access to and deletion of video material. 11 12 02/16/2021 7 City Council Meeting February 16, 2021 B2 – Award Citywide Public Safety Camera (PSCS) System Project Background •October 2016 – Ad-Hoc Committee established •Community outreach •Held focus groups •Conducted survey •Developed policy •March 2019 - Initiated 90-day pilot program •December 2019 - Design started 13 14 02/16/2021 8 Background •October 2020 – Council Approved PS&E and provided the following direction: •Move City Hall to Base Bid •Add Sports Complex, Museum, and Lumber Yard to Additive Alternates •January 25, 2021 – Bid Opening Date •5 bidders •Convergint Technologies lowest responsible/responsive bidder: $1,211,295.79 PSCS Project Scope 105 new cameras at the following locations: •Base Bid: 80 New Cameras •All Signalized and Major Roundabout Intersections: 58 •Fritz Burns Park: 4 •La Quinta Park: 5 •City Hall: 13 •Additive Alternates: 25 New Cameras •Wellness Center: 6 •Library: 5 •Additional Camera at La Quinta Park: 1 •La Quinta Museum and Lumber Yard: 8 •Sports Complex: 4 •Eisenhower Drive and Calle Sinaloa: 1 15 16 02/16/2021 9 BASE BID Intersection Locations •58 EA - 360° COMBINATION CAMERAS •2 EA - CAMERAS FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION •4 EA - RADIOS •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE 17 18 02/16/2021 10 Fritz Burns Park Cameras •4 EA - 360° EXTERIOR CAMERAS •2 EA – RADIOS •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE La Quinta Park Cameras •5 EA - 360° EXTERIOR CAMERAS •6 EA – RADIOS •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 19 20 02/16/2021 11 Civic Center Campus Cameras •5 EA - 360° EXTERIOR CAMERAS •8 EA – FIXED DOME CAMERAS •2 EA – PC BASE WORK STATIONS W/ MONITOR •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE BASE BID TOTAL COST ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $234,413.62 $234,413.62 2DUST CONTROL LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $109,400.00 $109,400.00 4FURNISH AND INSTALL CAMERA SYSTEM AT FRITZ BURNS PARK LS 1 $52,877.04 $52,877.04 5FURNISH AND INSTALL CAMERA SYSTEM AT LA QUINTA PARK LS 1 $38,274.38 $38,274.38 6FURNISH AND INSTALL CAMERA SYSTEM AT CITY HALL LS 1 $45,135.03 $45,135.03 7FURNISH AND INSTALL CAMERA SYSTEM AT INTERSECTIONS LS 1 $307,810.86 $307,810.86 8SYSTEM INTEGRATION LS 1 $159,813.47 $159,813.47 9AS‐BUILT PLANS LS 1 $10,113.60 $10,113.60 10 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT LS 1 $96,764.61 $96,764.61 SUB‐TOTAL BASE BID: $1,057,102.61 21 22 02/16/2021 12 ADDITIVE ALTERNATES Wellness Center Cameras •4 EA - 360° EXTERIOR CAMERAS •2 EA – FIXED DOME CAMERAS •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE •COST: $23,588.00 23 24 02/16/2021 13 La Quinta Library Cameras •2 EA- 360° EXTERIOR CAMERAS •3 EA– FIXED DOME CAMERAS •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE •COST: $21,304.68 La Quinta Park Cameras •1 EA - 360° EXTERIOR CAMERA •1 EA – RADIO •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE •COST: $13,281.67 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 25 26 02/16/2021 14 La Quinta Museum and Lumber Yard •6 EA - 360° EXTERIOR CAMERAS •2 EA – FIXED DOME CAMERAS (COURT YARD) •3 EA - RADIOS •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE •COST: $45,082.83 La Quinta Sports Complex •3 EA - 360° EXTERIOR CAMERAS •1 EA – FIXED DOME CAMERAS •2 EA - RADIOS •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE •COST: $33,078.00 27 28 02/16/2021 15 Calle Sinaloa and Eisenhower Drive Intersection •1 EA - 360° COMBINATION CAMERA •1 EA - RADIO •3 YEAR MAINTENANCE •COST: $17,858.00 PROJECT TOTAL COSTS ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST 1BASE BID ‐INTERSECTIONS, FRITZ BURN PARK, LA QUINTA PARK AND CITY HALL $1,057,102.61 2BID ALTERNATE NO. 1 ‐LA QUINTA WELLENESS CENTER $23,588.00 3BID ALTERNATE NO. 2 –LA QUINTA LIBRARY $21,304.68 4BID ALTERNATE NO. 3 –LA QUINTA PARK $13,281.67 5BID ALTERNATE NO. 4 –LA QUINTA MUSEUM AND LUMBER YARD $45,082.83 6BID ALTERNATE NO. 5 –LA QUINTA SPORTS COMPLEX $33,078.00 7BID ALTERNATE NO. 6 – CALLE SINALOA AND EISENHOWER DRIVE $17,858.00 GRAND TOTAL INCLUDING ALTERNATES 1 ‐6 $1,211,295.79 29 30 02/16/2021 16 Camera Types 31 32 02/16/2021 17 City Council Meeting February 16, 2021 B3 – Approve Design and Appropriate Funding for SilverRock Retention Basin Soil Stabilization Project 33 34 02/16/2021 18 SilverRock Retention Basin Soil Stabilization Project •Landscaping and irrigation of adjacent retention basin slopes •December 1, 2020: Council approved preliminary design funding appropriation •Preliminary design complete: 4 design options •Staff and FAC recommend Option 4 for implementation •Request appropriation of project budget from Measure G Reserves PHASE 1 PLAN 35 36 02/16/2021 19 DRONE VIEWS DRONE VIEWS 37 38 02/16/2021 20 2019 SLOPE AREA: AVENUE 52 AND BASIN CURRENT BASIN SLOPE CONDITION: AVENUE 52 AND BASIN 39 40 02/16/2021 21 CURRENT BASIN SLOPE AVENUE 52 AND BASIN SLOPE AREA SILVERROCK WAY 41 42 02/16/2021 22 SLOPE AREA SILVERROCK WAY EXISTING SLOPE PLANTING AT WATER FEATURE 43 44 02/16/2021 23 EXISTING SLOPE NORTH PARK EXISTING SLOPE EAST PARKING 45 46 02/16/2021 24 EXISTING SLOPE EAST PARKING OPTION 1 47 48 02/16/2021 25 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 49 50 02/16/2021 26 OPTION 4: Recommended PLANTING EXAMPLES DESERT HYDROSEED MIX 51 52 02/16/2021 27 PLANTING EXAMPLES ACACIA REDOLENS “Low Boy” 3’ HT 12’ SPREAD PLANTING EXAMPLES DALEA GREGGI 2’ HT X 8’ SPREAD 53 54 02/16/2021 28 PLANTING EXAMPLES LANTANA “NEW GOLD” 1-1/2’ HT X 4’- 6’ SPREAD PLANTING EXAMPLES ENCELLIA FARINOSA 4’-5’ HT X 5’- 6’ SPREAD 55 56 02/16/2021 29 PLANTING EXAMPLES JUSTICIA CALIFORNICA 4’ - 6’ HT X 8’- 12’ SPREAD PLANTING EXAMPLES SPHAERALCEA AMBIQUA 3’ HT X 3’ SPREAD 57 58 02/16/2021 30 COST P.S.F. OPTION ONE Non – irrigated hydroseed with jute netting 220,778 sf $698,298 $3.16 OPTION TWO Irrigated hydroseed 220,778 sf $358,000 $2.06 OPTION THREE Irrigated hydroseed/drip north and east slope 220,778 sf $444,075 $2.56 OPTION FOUR Irrigated hydroseed/drip with north slope and parking edge shrubs 153,225 sf $300,000 $2.33 Estimated Construction Costs Preliminary Design Options •Option 1: Non – irrigated hydroseed with jute netting –Estimated Total Cost: $1,017,769 •Option 2: Irrigated hydroseed –Estimated Total Cost: $521,785 •Option 3: Irrigated hydroseed/drip north and east slope –Estimated Total Cost: $647,239 •Option 4 (Recommended): Irrigated hydroseed/drip north slope and parking edge shrubs –Estimated Total Cost: $437,250 59 60 02/16/2021 31 Project Budget Current Budget Proposed Budget Predesign $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Design $ 0 $ 20,000 Professional $ 0 $ 23,250 Construction $ 0 $ 300,000 Utility Allowance $ 0 $ 15,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey $ 0 $ 29,250 Contingency $ 0 $ 39,750 Total Budget: $ 10,000 $ 437,250 Questions and Discussion 61 62 02/16/2021 32 City Council Meeting February 16, 2021 B4 – 2020/21 Mid-Year Budget Report, Approve Recommended Budget Adjustments and Designate Reserve Funding Allocations •General Fund •3 Internal Service Funds •15 Special Funds •Recommended Adjustments •Revenues $4,719,034 •Expenses $1,039,964 •General Fund Reserves •Review Balances •Allocation Options Mid-Year Report Includes 63 64 02/16/2021 33 Top Three Revenues •Property Taxes $800,000 •City of Chula Vista v. Sandoval •No retro adjustment •Sales Taxes $1,000,000 / $1,500,000 •Lagging remittances •Online sales, South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. •Local spending on taxable goods •Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) $1,500,000 •No hotel adjustment •Short-Term Vacation Rentals •Drive market, traveling families, online reporting Other General Fund Revenue Adjustments Revenue Type Increase Decrease Property Taxes 800,000 Sales Taxes 2,500,000 TOT Taxes 1,500,000 Licenses and Permits 50,000 Charges for Services 350,000 210,500 Fines and Other Taxes 26,000 One‐Time (CARES Act and FEMA)600,934 TOTAL Revenue Adjustments $5,000,934 $1,036,500 •Overall an increase of $3,964,434 •Continue to monitor changes •3rd Quarter Budget Report 65 66 02/16/2021 34 General Fund Expenses Expense Type Increase One‐Time (CARES & FEMA) $184,064 Credit Card & E‐Check Fees 80,000 GIS Consultant 45,000 HR Services (COVID) 20,000 Lot Abatements & Cleaning 4,000 Fritz Burns Pool 35,000 Janitorial Services 50,000 Street Cleaning/Accidents 10,000 GPSCVB (TOT MOU) 28,500 TOTAL Expense Adjustments $456,564 •Low due to carryovers from 2019/20 •No reductions proposed •Hope to reopen sooner in 2020/21 •Quick response = increased cost Other Fund Adjustments •Recognize grant revenues •Avoid budget shortfalls •Use fund balance when appropriate •Implement State recycling mandate •Fund updates resulting from Development Impact Fee study •Investment returns 67 68 02/16/2021 35Exhibit 2, Page 1Fund Name Revenues Expenses Description Facility & Fleet 60,000 2 vehicles Information Technology 25,800 Lease escrow account Insurance 77,000 Earthquake insurance Gas Tax 13,400 State projections Library & Museum (1,300) 23,000 Closure, cleaning, HVAC Cal Recycle 150,000 Organic waste program Measure A 200,000 Increase in sales taxes Emergency Mgmt. Grant 7,600 7,600 Trailer, generator, EOC So. Coast Air Quality 6,700 EV charging stations Housing Grants 60,000 60,000 Housing element update Other Fund Adjustments Exhibit 2, Page 2Fund Name Revenues Expenses Description Economic Development 109,100 169,100 Business grants, marketing Street Facility DIF (15,000) New merged Fund Park Facility DIF (6,600) New merged Fund Maintenance Facilities DIF 21,600 New Fund Art in Public Places 10,000 15,000 Fees, art mural installation Capital Improvement 15,000 15,000 Art mural installation CERBT OPEB Trust 15,000 Interest earnings PARS Pension Trust 300,000 Interest earnings Other Fund Adjustments Continued 69 70 02/16/2021 36 General Fund Reserves •Based on Reserve Policy •Balances as of 6/30/2020 •$500,000 allocated from Economic Disaster Reserve in current fiscal year •3 options for consideration Reserve Balances and Targets Reserve Category Current Balance Target Balance Surplus / (Deficit) Cash Flow $5,000,000 $5,000,000 ‐‐ Natural Disaster 10,000,000 10,000,000 ‐‐ Economic Disaster 6,800,000 11,000,000 (4,200,000) Capital Replacement 6,540,000 10,000,000 (3,460,000) Pension Trust 10,249,738 10,000,000 249,738 Total $38,589,738 $46,000,000 (7,410,262) Unassigned Fund Balance $19,094,653 Recommended Allocation ($5,000,000) Unassigned Fund Balance $14,094,653 71 72 02/16/2021 37 Funding Options Reserve Category Option 1Option 2Option 3Current Deficit Economic Disaster $2,500,000 $2,741,514 $4,200,000 ($4,200,000) Capital Replacement 2,500,000 2,258,486 800,000 (3,460,000) TOTAL $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 ($7,660,000) •Reserve Policy Adopted in FY 2017/18 •Third year of allocations •Funded ratio would be 95% after allocation Discussion & Questions 73 74 02/16/2021 38 City Council Meeting February 16, 2021 S1 – 2021 Pavement Management Plan Update 75 76 02/16/2021 39 Summary •Inspected all roadways for distress •Generated PCI ratings for all segments •Developed 5-year Preservation Program and costs City Streets •Adopted PCI Rating = 80 •2021 Average PCI Rating = 80 •29,702,050 Square Feet of Asphalt •Replacement Cost = $175.6M 77 78 02/16/2021 40 PCI RANGE CONDITION 86 - 100 Excellent 71 - 85 Very Good 56 - 70 Good 41 - 55 Fair 26 - 40 Poor 11 - 25 Very Poor 0 - 10 Failed Pavement Condition Ratings Pavement Management Poor Pavement Management like poor skin care can lead to costly and time- consuming repairs Skin Care Pavement Management Suntan and body lotion Crack and Slurry Seal Microderm Abrasion Grind and Overlay Pavement Skin Graft Reconstruct Pavement 79 80 02/16/2021 41 Pavement Life Cycle Slurry Seal = $ 0.49/SF Slurry w/Digouts = $ 1.69/SF Grind & Overlay = $ 3.53/SF Reconstruct = $ 8.59/SF Pavement Management System Zones 2021 81 82 02/16/2021 42 FY 2021-26 $1M PMP Budget Map FY 2021/22 •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs: •Avenue 52 from Washington St. to Desert Club Dr. •Desert Club Dr. from Avenue 52 to Calle Tampico •Seasons Way •Within Desert Pride development •Crack sealing: •East/West street segments within the Cove 83 84 02/16/2021 43 FY 2022/23 •Grind and overlay: •Avenue 47 between Washington Street and Adams Street •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs: •Avenida Herrera and Avenida Villa •Crack sealing: •North/South street segments within the Cove FY 2023/24 •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs: •Fred Waring Drive between Palm Royale and Adams Street •Crack seal and slurry seal: •Selected segments of Avenida Carranza, Avenida Navarro and Avenida Velasco •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs: •Segments of Avenida Montezuma and Avenida Ramirez 85 86 02/16/2021 44 FY 2024/25 •Crack sealing and slurry sealing: •Selected street segments in the Cove •Fred Waring Drive from Dune Palms Road to Jefferson Street •Additional various segments throughout the City •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs: •Summer View Way and Bottle Brush Drive FY 2025/26 •Crack seal and slurry seal: •Selected street segments in the Cove •Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs: •Calle Sinaloa from Avenida Montezuma to Eisenhower Drive 87 88 02/16/2021 45 Preservation Program/Costs •Annual expected PMP budget = $1,000,000 •Include additional pavement rehabilitation, resurfacing, and citywide striping refresh projects in CIP –Using SB1 and Measure A funding sources 89 90 02/16/2021 46 City Council Meeting February 16, 2021 PH1 – Jefferson Apartments 91 92 02/16/2021 47 Background •Project site was approved for “Villas at Indian Springs” –16 unit single family residential project •Included SDP, Specific Plan, TTM, and Zone Change to RM for consistency •Revised in 2019 for new access Vicinity Map 93 94 02/16/2021 48 Site Photos Analysis •Applicant proposes 40 unit multifamily residential project •Project includes: –Specific Plan repeal, Site Development Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, Variance, and Environmental Assessment 95 96 02/16/2021 49 Specific Plan •Repeal Villas at Indian Springs Specific Plan •Allows regulation by underlying RM zone Site Development Permit •SDP proposed for design of project •Project includes: –Five total buildings, 1-2 stories –40 units: 36 two-bedroom, 4 three-bedroom –104 parking spaces –Common open area, lawn areas, shade structures, pool, landscaping 97 98 02/16/2021 50 Site Plan Renderings 99 100 02/16/2021 51 Elevations Perspectives 101 102 02/16/2021 52 Landscaping Variance •Project seeks variance from “Height limits and setbacks near image corridors”: –Within first 150 ft from Jefferson St, maximum one story and 22 feet height •Project proposes two stories and maximum height of 25’ in some areas 103 104 02/16/2021 53 Elevations Variance •Variance requested due to constraints of size and shape of the project site •Limited area outside 150’ standard •Without variance, other development standards could not be met (setbacks, density, landscaping, parking, open area) 105 106 02/16/2021 54 Tentative Parcel Map Zoning and General Plan Consistency •RM zone (Residential Medium) allows density of 40 units •Project furthers RHNA housing element goals •Deficit of 54 moderate in current cycle; will need 296 moderate and 543 above moderate in next cycle 107 108 02/16/2021 55 Zoning and General Plan Consistency •Apartment rental housing adds to a broad range/diversity of housing types needed in La Quinta. •Project increases housing choices for moderate-income households. •Planning Commission reviewed the project and unanimously voted to recommend Council approval Environmental Assessment •Under Villas at Indian Springs Project, a MND was certified •A Subsequent MND was prepared to determine changes and potential impacts •Determined there will not be a significant effect with mitigation measures 109 110 02/16/2021 56 111 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 16, 2021 1 From: Sent:Saturday, February 13, 2021 3:53 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written comments EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Re: Short Term Vacation Rentals Dear City Manager, I support responsible short term vacation rentals by our local residents. This is an important source of revenue for them during these hard times. I do not support ownership of short term rentals by out-of-town owners. Thank you, Lee Anderson La Quinta CityClerkMail@LaQuintaCA.gov specifying the following information: (1) Full Name (2) City of Residence (3) Phone Number (4) Public Comment or Agenda Item Number (5) Subject (6) Written or Telephonic Verbal Comments The email “subject line” must clearly state “Written Comments” or “Telephonic Verbal Comments.” CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT LEE ANDERSON PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - RELATED TO STVRS 1 From:Meagan Beavers > Sent:Monday, February 15, 2021 11:59 AM To:City Clerk Mail; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Steve Sanchez; Robert Radi; Linda Evans; Kevin Meredith; Jon McMillen Subject:WRITTEN COMMENTS - Short Term Rental EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Council members, As I write this note to you, at 10pm on a Saturday night, the house next door is full of weekend "guests" partying. That's the thing about guests ‐ they are our guests. But this is the thing ‐ I didn't invite them. Yet here I am, with a house next door that is a revolving door of guests. Guests I didn't invite, but guests nonetheless that I live with 24/7. I know you have heard my stories. My sad story of working, going to school, trying to enjoy this beautiful home I worked so hard to purchase. You have heard my story and you now sit in deliberations still contemplating subjecting more residents to the same. But there is another young lady's story related to the short term rental next door, a story that still haunts me. It is early evening on a hot summer late afternoon in our lovely La Quinta. Suddenly there is a "bang‐ bang‐bang" on my front door. Loud. Forceful. Demanding. I look out the side window and there is a lady standing on my porch, she looks concerned. I normally would not answer, but then I look behind her and see another lady, with a look that tells me ‐ I need to open the door. I open the door cautiously, but before I can say anything, she says, "you are safe. You can come out". I replied, "safe? Why am I not safe?". The other lady approaches and repeats the other's words: "you can come out, you are safe". I said, "again ‐ why am i not safe?". She then tells me she is a police officer, as is the other woman: "Who is in there with you?". I replied, "no one". She said, "are you sure about that? We are here to help you". I then see multiple officers stepping out from behind a tree on my front lawn, and a wall at the front of my house. My house had been completely surrounded ‐ what was going on? Apparently a woman had called 911 that she was being sexually assaulted, but then the phone had been disconnected. The ping from the phone came from my backyard. I quickly reviewed with the police the people who lived around me. The only outlier was the rental next door. I knew something weird had been happening at the house. You see, my living room window, and kitchen window are both 2 feet from the fence line ‐ I hear everything when the windows are open. For the past week a large group of only men were at the house, the driveway full of high‐end cars. They never used the pool, there was never music or laughter. Instead they would sit for short times throughout the day at a table right at the fence line, smoking. Something didn't sit well with me for days, and I had wondered what was going on in that house. And now here we were ‐ my house surrounded by police, talking to undercover police officers trying to get me to come with them to a safe place, because of a ping from a cell phone. The police went next door and pounded on the door ‐ no answer. Ultimately the police had to leave ‐ they did not have a search warrant. Less than 10 minutes after the police left, the entire house next door was vacated. I have often wondered about that girl. I have wondered about the abuse that she endured 2 feet away from my kitchen window, in our lovely little La Quinta. Because that's the thing about uninvited house guests. They also bring their dirty laundry. YOU are responsible to ensure this community continues to THRIVE for its community members. YOU have an opportunity to stop promoting unsupervised transiet lodgings in our neighborhoods. WE gave you the power to work for THIS community. I am begging you ‐ please stop issuing licenses for unsupervised STR's in our neighborhoods. Meagan Beavers La Quinta Homeowner 2007‐present PUBLIC COMMENT/SHORT TERM RENTALS CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MEAGAN BEAVERS PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From:Meagan Beavers Sent:Monday, February 15, 2021 12:16 PM To:City Clerk Mail; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Steve Sanchez; Robert Radi; Linda Evans; Kevin Meredith; Jon McMillen Subject:WRITTEN COMMENTS #2 - Short Term Rental EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Council Members I want you to hear my story ‐ again. The fact you continue to contemplate having unsupervised short term rentals in this community means that you do not care about homeowners ‐ including me. And this breaks my heart ‐ we voted each of you in, yet you do not have the best interest of homeowners of this city in forethought. I live beside, and across the street from short term rentals. I purchased my home, my very first home, in 2007. I am an immigrant to this country, and I came alone to America. I wanted to become a part of this country, I wanted to become a part of a great community, to know my neighbors. So, I worked non‐stop, scrimping and saving for 3 years so I could purchase a home on my own. And I did ‐ within 3 years of being an immigrant to this country. I worked so hard for this beautiful home that I absolutely love. I have spent 12 years now listening to parties every weekend beside my home, and across the street. I have considered selling, but until recently I have not been able to get what I purchased my home for. But why should I sell this home that I love? A home that I have done major renovations on, so that it suited me perfectly? Why should I sell my home so that the Orange County residents who own these homes beside me, and across the street, can continue to line their pockets? I am an Emergency Room Registered Nurse. I need my sleep to function strong in providing care to the community. Yet, I have had to get up in the middle of the night and rent hotel rooms because of noise. A cost out of my own pocket. There have been times, I have not slept at all over several days, so I had to call off sick. Ultimately, I had to quit my job, so that I could work in a position to accommodate the rental situation next door, a position that did not involve patient care and was 8 hours versus 13 hours. I took a $25‐thousand‐dollar‐year pay cut. For the short term rentals next door. I have never been reimbursed for the total loss of $250,000 +hotel bills, so that my non‐existent neighbors next door could run their hotel. Please think about that number ‐ $250,000 loss wages to help "support" the little business next door. I have so many stories about the inconveniences in having unmanaged hotels living near me ‐ I have found clothes in my pool, a drunk man banging on my door at 5am, I have had my house surrounded by police telling me to get out of my house. They thought I was being sexually assaulted after receiving a call for help ‐ from the short term rental next door. The address provided was wrong. I can't even imagine what could have happened had I not answered that door ‐ it was very apparent the police were concerned about my welfare. YOU are responsible to ensure this community continues to THRIVE for its community members. YOU have an opportunity to stop promoting unsupervised transient lodgings in our neighborhoods. WE gave you the power to work for THIS community. I am begging you ‐ please stop issuing licenses for unsupervised STR's in our neighborhoods. Meagan Beavers La Quinta Homeowner 2007‐present PUBLIC COMMENT/SHORT TERM RENTALS CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MEAGAN BEAVERS PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From:Michael Rosenfeld Sent:Monday, February 15, 2021 7:31 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written comments ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Honorable Mayor and all City Council Members I am writing to express my feelings about the STVR madness that is happening in LQ. I have been a resident for 36 years and am your constituent. I live here full time, pay taxes and vote. I feel that non-La Quinta investors are destroying our “neighborhoods”. There is the important word.... “neighborhood “. I encourage you to rethink your decisions on regulations related to density..... the lots in the cove are 50x100. You can hear your Neighbor use their bathroom if both windows are open! A density cap is needed! Also a permanent moratorium on new licensing of STVR’s. How about protecting constituents rather than outside investor interests. One of my neighbors has been repeatedly verbally bullied by the owner of the STVR next to her. Sad! Sincerely Judy Carey Sent from my iPhone CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JUDY CAREY PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS & REQUEST TO REGULATE DENSITY 1 From:Donald Church Sent:Monday, February 15, 2021 9:45 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Letter to City Council Attachments:Cove Letter 2.docx Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Attached is a letter for the Mayor and the City Council. Thank you, Donald Church CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT DONALD CHURCH PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From:Marcia Cutchin Sent:Monday, February 15, 2021 7:10 PM To:Monika Radeva; City Clerk Mail Subject:Fw: Written comments FEBRUARY 16th Council Meeting Attachments:2_Newest Letter to City Council.docx EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Monika, Please include my attached letter in the written public comments of the February 16th council meeting. 1) Full Name Marcia Cutchin 4)Public Comment or Agenda Item Number - ??? 2) City of Residence - La Quinta 5) Subject - Cost of STVRs 3) Phone Number - 6) Written Comments Thank you, Marcia L Cutchin CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARCIA CUTCHIN PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS Dear Mayor and City Council, The slides are from the end of the year city financial report presented to council on 12-15-21. Total TOT is fifth. Residential TOT is 6th as you can't lump it in with hotel TOT for the purpose of implying it is more significant income than it is. Not 2nd as quoted in council and subsequently repeated by every STVR owner in La Quinta. The cost of city employees, code enforcement, contracts with Deckard, Host Compliance, and LodgingRevs, police and sheriff, are estimated at approximately 1.5 million. Hardly any of these costs are incurred by hotels, designated transient tourist lodgings or in-residence hosts. When you remove the Tourist Vacation Zone units and host in residence units the TOT does not cover the cost of running them. They are presently operating at a cost to residents of not only our quality of life but our taxes and services as well. Costing us money, terrorizing residents, exhausting city resources, consuming thousands of man hours, eating up scarce housing, and you are further promoting this. It makes no sense. Is your plan to triple the program until you can squeeze some measure of profit out of it? The deliberate avoidance of addressing density caps at the last meeting implies you intend to leave the door open to grow the program – against all evidence of its costly and corrosive effects on a community. It would take 3000 units to get enough income to justify the ruination of our neighborhoods. 3000 unmanned businesses destroying the quality of life of your citizens vs. 3 cannabis stores in correctly zoned areas. And council has determined the detriment to our society is greater with the 3 cannabis stores than the 3000 unmanned business in our bedroom communities? Outlawing cannabis stores in La Quinta isn’t stopping anyone from using the product. It isn’t making it less available when you can have it delivered. It is just refusing the revenue. Three cannabis operations would bring in close to 1.5 million and not cost thousands of man hours and all of the nonsense expenses the STVR program does. That would be REAL income. Please consider it. Please make the only logical decision and order a permanent moratorium on new STVR licensing and get some hard density limits in place. We want our neighborhoods back. We have too many STVRs. You can’t OBVIOUSLY CAN’T control them. There were HORRIBLE PROBLEMS ALL OVER THE CITY, JUST THIS LAST WEEKEND! They are RUINING OUR NEIGHBORHOODS, and they are too expensive. Marcia L Cutchin CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARCIA CUTCHIN PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From:Sarah GELBERD > Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 2:54 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Public Comment restriction on STVR ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Sarah Gelberd Los Angeles and La Quinta Public Comment I support STVR in La Quinta specifically at PGA West and Legacy Vilas.. I advocate for STVR. It will benefit the homeowners property values and thus the City of La Quinta. Noise and other current violations should be enforce for the entire community not blame only STVR. Also consider reducing the costs of issuing permits . CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT SARAH GELBERD PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN SUPPORT OF STVRS 2 The General Plan approved in 2013 states “Land Use Element is the key to a successful General Plan. It impacts the City’s growth most directly and provides the greatest guidance in the City’s vision for its build out.” Residential is mentioned 92 times in the Land Use Component. The Plan states: “It is critical to the City’s economy, and its ability to maintain services for residents that preserve quality of life, that commercial development, particularly on Highway 111, remain successful, vibrant and income‐producing.” The relationship of Residents and Commercial well being is repeated throughout There is a land use category ‐ MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. This land use designation is specifically for single family dwellings. It does not mention tourist vacation rentals. Bed and breakfast facilities are included which have their own specific ordinances governing this type of use permit, including a 300 ft limit between those businesses. Nowhere is there any mention of mini motels or a reference made to the “hotelization” of a residential neighborhood. There are a few Land Use categories that are relevant in a discussion of STVRs in Residential Districts. . Tourist or Resort is mentioned 19 times,. mostly in the category TOURIST COMMERICAL which states “This land use designation is specifically geared to tourism-related land uses, such as resort hotels, hotels and motels, and resort commercial development”. The Policy (LU‐6.3) is to support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City’s economic base. Program LU‐6.3.a: States “someone” will Provide standards for a broad range of tourist commercial land uses in the Zoning Ordinance. The GENERAL PLAN further explains is Policy LU‐2.2: “Specific Plans shall be required for projects proposing the integration of recreation, tourist commercial and residential uses; and for all projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance.” I cannot find those standards or specific plans which propose flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. The guidance of the City’s vision in the General Plan is not being followed. I support the vision laid out in the General Plan: Residential districts are for residents and Tourist Commercial districts are for tourist accommodations. The non‐planning you have that you’re currently doing regarding STVR’s and their integration into residential areas is not working. And no amount of code enforcement is going to make work. It doesn’t work here, it doesn’t work in Palm Springs or any other CV city, and it hasn’t worked in countless cities across the nation and around the world. What is your vision for LQ? CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 3 Let’s move forward and fulfill the VISION of the GENERAL PLAN. Residential Districts are for single family dwellings not motels and Tourist Commercial District is for tourist accommodations. We already know that RESORT RESIDENTIAL is PROHIBITED in the Cove. Let’s ENFORCE this prohibition and follow the advice of the General Plan. Make PERMANENT the MORATORIUM ON ANY NEW STVR PERMITS in residential zones. Continue with Home Shares and Bed and Breakfast lodging where the owner lives in the house. Ban STVRs in residential zones with a 2 year phase out. Owners can do any of the following and still reap a profit on their investment. o Rent their property for more than 31 days – it will more than cover their monthly expenses o Sell their property and make a profit on their investment o Reside in their property Allow STVRs in HOAs which allow them. Increase Hotel rooms and STVRs in Commercial Zones. Please follow the mandate of the General Plan and make Residential Districts for residents. Thank you. Arlene Gotshalk ‐‐ _________________________________________________________ "For there is always light / If only we’re brave enough to see it / If only we’re brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman Arlene Gotshalk CareGiving Toolkit PO Box 643, La Quinta, CA 92247 www.caregivingtoolkit.com CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS Arlene Gotshalk Madam Mayor and Council Members, Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today. I am a full-time resident of the Cove neighborhood and ask you to continue the moratorium on issuing STVR permits as we work together to find acceptable mitigations to the exploding #s of STVRs in LQ. LQ Ordinances defines the primary use of property in Residential Districts as “for single family dwelling”. Why would commercial vacation rentals be allowed in any residential neighborhood? STVRs’ primary use of the property is decidedly not as a single family dwelling but for a commercial profit. How could such a substantial and significant change in zoning usage take place without a complete revision of the General Plan and accompanying Zoning Ordinances? The General Plan approved in 2013 states “Land Use Element is the key to a successful General Plan. It impacts the City’s growth most directly and provides the greatest guidance in the City’s vision for its build out.” Residential is mentioned 92 times in the Land Use Component. The Plan states: “It is critical to the City’s economy, and its ability to maintain services for residents that preserve quality of life, that commercial development, particularly on Highway 111, remain successful, vibrant and income-producing.” The relationship of Residents and Commercial well being is repeated throughout There is a land use category - MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. This land use designation is specifically for single family dwellings. It does not mention tourist vacation rentals. Bed and breakfast facilities are included which have their own specific ordinances governing this type of use permit, including a 300 ft limit between those businesses. Nowhere is there any mention of mini motels or a reference made to the “hotelization” of a residential neighborhood. There are a few Land Use categories that are relevant in a discussion of STVRs in Residential Districts. . Tourist or Resort is mentioned 19 times,. mostly in the category TOURIST COMMERICAL which states “This land use designation is specifically geared to tourism-related land uses, such as resort hotels, hotels and motels, and resort commercial development”. The Policy (LU-6.3) is to support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City’s economic base. Program LU 6.3.a: States “someone” will Provide standards for a broad range of tourist commercial land uses in the Zoning Ordinance. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS The GENERAL PLAN further explains is Policy LU-2.2: “Specific Plans shall be required for projects proposing the integration of recreation, tourist commercial and residential uses; and for all projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance.” I cannot find those standards or specific plans which propose flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. The guidance of the City’s vision in the General Plan is not being followed. I support the vision laid out in the General Plan: Residential districts are for residents and Tourist Commercial districts are for tourist accommodations. The non-planning you have that you’re currently doing regarding STVR’s and their integration into residential areas is not working. And no amount of code enforcement is going to make work. It doesn’t work here, it doesn’t work in Palm Springs or any other CV city, and it hasn’t worked in countless cities across the nation and around the world. What is your vision for LQ? Let’s move forward and fulfill the VISION of the GENERAL PLAN. Residential Districts are for single family dwellings not motels and Tourist Commercial District is for tourist accommodations. We already know that RESORT RESIDENTIAL is PROHIBITED in the Cove. Let’s ENFORCE this prohibition and follow the advice of the General Plan. • Make PERMANENT the MORATORIUM ON ANY NEW STVR PERMITS in residential zones. • Continue with Home Shares and Bed and Breakfast lodging where the owner lives in the house. • Ban STVRs in residential zones with a 2 year phase out. Owners can do any of the following and still reap a profit on their investment. o Rent their property for more than 31 days – it will more than cover their monthly expenses o Sell their property and make a profit on their investment o Reside in their property • Allow STVRs in HOAs which allow them. • Increase Hotel rooms and STVRs in Commercial Zones. Please follow the mandate of the General Plan and make Residential Districts for residents. Thank you. Arlene Gotshalk CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From:Bob Stoddard <> Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 1:11 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments - STVRs - 2/16/2021 La Quinta City Council EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. February 16, 2021 Bob & Cindy Stoddard La Quinta, CA Public Comment STVR Written Comment We have lived in La Quinta, since 2004, and chose this city, particularly North La Quinta for its quiet, friendly and family atmosphere, which we have enjoyed immensely except for the current state we presently find ourselves in, which is the over saturation of STVRs in our surrounding neighborhood and area. We recognize the monumental task, which the City has undertaken to comprehensively address all aspects of the STVR program and the multiple impacts it has on a wide array of people, whom have either been directly or indirectly affected by the STVR program. As homeowners, presently surrounded by five(5) STVRs and the high probability of two(2) additional recently purchased homes for the express purpose of converting into STVRs, we strongly encourage the City Council and Staff to proactively resolve this matter, with a strong sense of urgency and necessity, concerning the overall density and clustering of STVRs in our residential neighborhood. The express purpose and reasons for us in choosing North La Quinta, as our permanent place of residence, is of paramount importance to us today. Respectfully, Bob & Cindy Stoddard CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS BOB & CINDY STODDARD PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS & REQUESTING TO ADDRESS DENSITY 1 From:Paul Hoesterey > Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 2:52 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:written comments ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Paul Hoesterey La Quinta Resident  Agenda Item: Business session items 1 and 2 City wide cameras Comments Members of the City Council I am writing to express my disappointment with each of you and the city staff. In June 2019, I spoke regarding concerns about plans for the city‐wide camera system. I’ll not raise those concerns again because it is obvious it will be asserted that you’ve addressed them with your policy and via the series of meetings and communications; and it is clear you are going to proceed. My disappointment is this: at that meeting in 2019, more than one of you thanked me for my comments and said you’d be in touch to discuss them further. Yet, I’ve not heard a single word from anyone connected with the city. Your agenda packet details a series of meetings, hearings, communications, etc. etc. but I had not been aware of a single one of them ‘til now. Thus, I have received your message loud and clear. As an aside, I have spoken with nearly two dozen people about your plan. Not one had heard of it. Not one thought it a good idea. As a further aside, I am seeing my city change – I realize that is inevitable. Some good things have happened in this town. But I’ve also seen a series of decisions that have harmed / lessened the enjoyment of our community. Some are large, controversial, and obvious – SilverRock, Ironman, STVRs. Some are smaller matters quietly eroding the quality of this little gem – a four story motel right on 111, the ugly/obtrusive “pro shop” across from the high school, expensive roundabouts in residential neighborhoods, re‐striping residential streets and making them look like arterials, “traffic calming” measures that don’t work, subpar maintenance of streetscapes … it would not be difficult to go on and on pointing out these “small” matters. This unnecessary, expensive, intrusive plan for cameras throughout the city is merely one more addition to the sad list of misguided decisions in recent times. Unfortunately you are earning the reputation of being a council and a city that does not care what your residents think – you will proceed and do what you have convinced yourselves is good with little regard to what your citizens express. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT PAUL HOESTEREY BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NOS. 1 & 2 - IN OPPOSITION OF PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM PROJECT 1 From:Mario Sewell Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 2:22 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Mario Sewell City of Residence - La Quinta 2/16/2021 Council Meeting Business Session Item #1: Approve Policies and Procedures for Citywide Public Safety Camera System in La Quinta Item #2: Appropriate Funding and Award Contract to Convergent Technologies for Citywide Public Safety Camera System Project No. 2020-03 This is to urge the Council not to approve both items for the following reasons: 1. The proposal specifies that recorded incidents will not be continuously monitored by staff. Instead there will be computer algorithms that will automatically notify police when an incident as defined by preset parameters occurs. As an 18 year resident of the Cove there is a perception that, more often than warranted, Black and Brown residents are pulled over for no apparent reason. This may not be valid, but giving the responsibility for triggering an incident on PSCS with police involvement to a computer program may not be the solution. It is recommended that the algorithms be reviewed by a community task force on an initial and ongoing basis. 2. The Sheriff Department has indicated that their law enforcement practices and policies will not be modified based on implementation of the PSCS. The original intent of the PSCS was to maintain, if not reduce, the proportion of City funds directed to RSD for law enforcement. Instead the City is being asked to spend $1.3 million with the stated refusal of RSD to consider modifying their services. Than why it it being considered? 3. In my time in the Cove there have been break-ins and armed holdups in homes on my street. If the City cannot afford additional officers, then how does the camera system help? Wouldn't re-establishment of the Neighborhood Watch or similar program be worth reconsidering? Sincerely, Mario Sewell CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARIO SEWELL BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NOS. 1 & 2 - IN OPPOSITION OF PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM PROJECT 1 From:Carlos Flores Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:49 AM To:Monika Radeva Cc:Nichole Romane; Laurie McGinley Subject:FW: Jefferson Street Apartments Support Attachments:Scanned from a Xerox Multifunction Printer.pdf For PH1… Carlos Flores | Senior Planner Design and Development City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7069 www.laquintaca.gov PLEASE NOTE: Due to State Orders regarding COVID-19, City Hall is closed to the public. Applications may not be submitted in person; however, they can be submitted online through E-Trakit . City staff is available at (760) 777-7125 or via email at customercenter@laquintaca.gov to answer any questions. From: Dawson Bailard Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 10:31 AM To: Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Jefferson Street Apartments Support EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Please read /register my support for this project at the council meeting on the approval. Thank you, Dawson Bailard CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT DAWSON BAILARD PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN SUPPORT OF JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT 1 From:Carlos Flores Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:50 AM To:Monika Radeva Cc:Nichole Romane; Laurie McGinley Subject:FW: La Quinta Apartment Project Carlos Flores | Senior Planner Design and Development City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7069 www.laquintaca.gov PLEASE NOTE: Due to State Orders regarding COVID-19, City Hall is closed to the public. Applications may not be submitted in person; however, they can be submitted online through E-Trakit . City staff is available at (760) 777-7125 or via email at customercenter@laquintaca.gov to answer any questions. From: Brian Dowdle > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 1:04 PM To: Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: La Quinta Apartment Project EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello, My name is Brian Dowdle. I have lived in the Esplanade Community for the last 8 years and have enjoyed it thus far. I work in the construction industry and have been following the piece of property to see what will be built there. I would be thrilled for my older kids to have affordable housing in La Quinta area.I think the city is lacking in apartment living and i am happy to see a possible option. I think the layout is nice and it is in a very desirable location. I have no issue speaking with you directly if need be. please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Brian Dowdle BD CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT BRIAN DOWDLE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN SUPPORT OF JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT From: Rick Hand Date: February 15, 2021 at 3:30:28 PM PST To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Application Specific Plan 2020‐0001 EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Mayor Evans... My name is Rick Hand, I am a resident at Westward Isle, the property immediately adjacent to the property in this application. I am opposed to this new plan. This property was previously approved over 7‐8 years ago, to build 15 single story houses, not only by the City, but by the majority of homeowners in our Westward Isle The HOA voted to approve an Easement of our Palm Circle Drive for the use of creating an entrance to this original project. Five years ago, CVWD refused a Sewer Permit to Mr. Snellenberger to build a sewer access line under Palm Circle Drive. A year later, Mr Snellenberger was granted approval of a similarly planned project which once again was 15 single story houses, only using direct access off of Jefferson, instead or the originally planned entrance off of our street, Palm Circle Drive. This new project is a vast difference between the two previously approved projects, going from 15 single story houses to 10 (40 units) one and two story buildings. When I first bought my home here, I was looking out at a green golf course, and the surrounding mountains. We had no walls or buildings to impede our views. Jefferson was only two lanes wide, traffic was light, noise was limited, it was a quiet peaceful place to live. I could honestly see the Milky Way at night. I understand progress and growth. Jefferson is now six lanes wide, the stars have been replaced by streetlights, days are now filled with traffic noise, the quiet nights are now replaced by the reverberation of rock and roll music on the weekends from the pub across the street, and the old golf course club house has been replaced by a Dermatology Office. Now you want to build apartments? I felt alarmed when they talked about building houses there, but was calmed when convinced by the contractor, when he met with our HOA 10 years ago, that he would only be building single story homes. I am relying now on the wisdom of the City Council to hold the developer to his word and to not go over single stories. I'm also asking the City Council to consider the density level of 40 units on a 3.2 acre parcel. Thank you for serving our city, which I've paid taxes to and loved so much for over 35 years. I've also attached a letter our HOA President, Mark Watkins sent to the La Quinta planning commission, three weeks ago. Rick Hand CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICK HAND PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT Westward Isle HOA La Quinta, California January 22, 2021 La Quinta Planning Commission DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 by email to:Cflores@LaQuintaCA.gov Re: Application: Specific Plan 2020-0001 Site Development Applicant: Jim Snellenberger Location: Southeast corner of Jefferson at Palm Circle Drive Dear La Quinta Design Development Department and La Quinta City Planning Commission: Westward Isle is the development adjacent to and bordering the above-described proposed development (hereinafter the “Proposed Development”). Westward Isle borders the Proposed Development on the North side by way of its private road, Palm Circle Drive, and 7 of Westward Isle’s 28 units border the Proposed Development’s East side (Westward Isle’s West border). As such, Westward Isle has a significant interest in the particulars of the Proposed Development. Originally the project was designed for 19 single family homes. Westward Isle did not and does not oppose a development of that nature. The original plan included a mandate by the City of La Quinta that the Proposed Development bring sewer within reach of Westward Isle and provide a stub for connection. But this is not the place for a 40 unit apartment complex1. Westward Isle opposes such a development for the following reasons: 1At the time of this writing, the only information available is from the undated Notice of Public Hearing and which provides no details of the proposal other than it is for a 40 unit apartment complex. As such, this should not be considered an exhaustive list of the potential reasons for opposition to the project. c/o Millennium Community Management 75145 St. Charles Place, #3; Palm Desert, CA. 92260 866-508-2780 CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICK HAND PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT The Proposed Development Will Cause Excessive Traffic Congestion • The only entrance to the Proposed Development can be from northbound Jefferson. There is an island and no possibility of left turn from southbound Jefferson into the complex. U-turn is prohibited at the first light south (Vista Grande/Home Depot). U-turn is also prohibited at the second light south (Jefferson/Highway 111). Already there is a significant number of vehicles that make illegal and dangerous U-turns at both lights. Adding 80 or so resident’s vehicles with incentive to make those illegal turns multiple times a day, plus their guests, deliveries and service providers adds hundreds of vehicles to the mix, daily. • The only exit from the Proposed Development is to onto northbound Jefferson. The first U-turn available on to Jefferson southbound is at Westward Ho. This is also the turn to La Quinta High School, several other communities and La Quinta Park. This left turn is already congested, especially during school hours and traffic often backs up onto Jefferson. Adding potentially several hundred vehicles daily to this creates an unacceptable situation that is both dangerous and inconsistent with the existing population density of the area. • With the bridge over Whitewater channel at the southern end of the Proposed Development and Palm Circle Drive only a few hundred feet away, the distance between the Proposed Development’s entrance creates a hazzard and nuisance. There is a left turn break in the median for Palm Circle Drive with no traffic controls. Again, vehicles can only exit the Proposed Development on to Jefferson north bound. Adding several hundred vehicles a day coming and going from the Proposed Development creates a hazzard for vehicles entering and exiting Westward Isle, especially those turning left from south bound Jefferson and/or to those traveling on north bound Jefferson. The closer the Proposed Development’s entrance is to the bridge, the more blind it becomes for drivers on Jefferson and people exiting the Proposed Development because of the slope of the bridge. At that section, Jefferson has a speed limit of 55 mph. (City of La Quinta Resolution #2007-108) The closer the Proposed Development’s entrance is to Palm Circle Drive, the more dangerous it becomes to vehicles entering and exiting Palm Circle Drive. The Proposed Development is Out of Character for the Area • The height of the structure will almost certainly exceed 20'. The Proposed Development will have to be 2 or even 3 stories (see footnote 1, above). There are no adjacent two story structures. The only comparable structure is the Arches, across the Whitewater channel which provides a substantial division between the more commercial area and the residential area nearer the high school. A two or three story structure will substantially interfere with the character of the neighborhood. • The small plot makes it unlikely that the Proposed Development will be able to meet parking requirements without putting it under the residential units, increasing the height of the buildings and further making them out of character with the area. c/o Millennium Community Management 75145 St. Charles Place, #3; Palm Desert, CA. 92260 866-508-2780 CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICK HAND PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT The Proposed Development Violates the La Quinta Municipal Code for Housing Density • The area is characterized by single family homes. La Quinta Municipal Code 9.30.050 for Medium Density Residential Districts limits density to 4 - 8 units per acre. The parcel is 2.4 Acres. The Proposed Development of 40 units is well in excess of the 9-19 unit limit of the La Quinta Municipal Code. • Additionally, no information is available as to the number of bedrooms proposed for each unit, making it impossible to determine the number of persons per unit that might be added by the Proposed Development. For all the foregoing reasons, Westward Isle Homeowner’s Association opposes the Proposed Development. January 21, 2021 ___________________________ Mark L. Watkins, Ph.D. President, Westward Isle HOA c/o Millennium Community Management 75145 St. Charles Place, #3; Palm Desert, CA. 92260 866-508-2780 CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICK HAND PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT 1 From:Carlos Flores Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:50 AM To:Monika Radeva Cc:Laurie McGinley; Nichole Romane Subject:FW: Specific Plan 2020-0001 Attachments:Letter To City Council - Snellenberger Plan.docx Carlos Flores | Senior Planner Design and Development City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7069 www.laquintaca.gov PLEASE NOTE: Due to State Orders regarding COVID-19, City Hall is closed to the public. Applications may not be submitted in person; however, they can be submitted online through E-Trakit . City staff is available at (760) 777-7125 or via email at customercenter@laquintaca.gov to answer any questions. From: Rick Hand > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 3:48 PM To: Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Specific Plan 2020‐0001 EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Can I please be given an opportunity to speak before the City Council in regards to this plan, tomorrow evening? I am opposed to the project plan. Thanks, Rick Hand CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICK HAND PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT 1 From:Carlos Flores Sent:Friday, February 12, 2021 9:35 AM To:Monika Radeva Cc:Nichole Romane; Laurie McGinley; Tania Flores; Cheri Flores Subject:FW: Public Hearing 2/16: Written Comments Attachments:J Hill Written Opposition for Specific Plan 2020 0001.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hello, Please find attached written comments regarding PH1 Jefferson Apartments. Regards, Carlos Flores | Senior Planner Design and Development City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7069 www.laquintaca.gov PLEASE NOTE: Due to State Orders regarding COVID-19, City Hall is closed to the public. Applications may not be submitted in person; however, they can be submitted online through E-Trakit . City staff is available at (760) 777-7125 or via email at customercenter@laquintaca.gov to answer any questions. From: Jennifer Hill Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:09 PM To: Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Public Hearing 2/16: Written Comments EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello Mr. Flores, Please find my attached written comments that I would like included in opposition of Specific Plan 2020‐0001, Tentative Parcel Map 2020‐0001 and Variance 2020‐0001. I would also request the opportunity to provide telephonic verbal comments at the meeting in which this topic will be discussed on Tuesday, February 16 at 5:00pm. Thank you. Jennifer Hill CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JENNIFER HILL PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF JEFFERSON ST APARTMENTS February 11, 2021 Dear Madam Mayor and City Council Members, My name is Jennifer Hill, I am a life-long resident of the Coachella Valley, a teacher at John Glenn Middle School and a new owner in the Westward Isle condominium development. I am writing in regards to the Jefferson Street Apartment complex proposal adjacent to my home on the agenda for your February 16 meeting. While I understand from attending the City Planning Meeting, the City of La Quinta is short on apartments in this area, I am concerned with the location of the planned entrance, the request for a height variance, as well as the number of units proposed for this small, irregularly shaped parcel. I am in disagreement with Mr. Snellenberger’s assessment that there would be little to no negative impact on the surrounding area. As you know, Jefferson Street is one of our main arteries in and out of La Quinta. This road is busy all day and night. The entrance for this project is just north of the bridge allowing very little distance to slow from the 50 mph posted speed limit to allow for cars to turn in and out of the complex. There is no turn lane in the proposal to allow cars to slow without impeding traffic. It is also the second right turn within 150 feet. Based on this location and square footage of the units, one can assume that families will move into these apartments. We have three schools within this boundary. Imagine families taking kids to school, or students walking across Jefferson Street during the busiest times of the day or the increased traffic during the golf tournament or spring festivals. Additionally, because there is no left turn into the complex due to the median and no U-turns at lights, cars will be forced to illegally travel through the Home Depot parking lot, flip u-turns in the neighborhood off of Vista Grande or travel 4 miles out of the way to circumnavigate the one planned entrance. 104 cars using one entrance via Jefferson Street is an accident waiting to happen! During the Planning Commission meeting on January 26, I learned that the gross acreage is used for determining zone allowance density, not the net. In Mr. Snellenburger’s plan, 5.2 acres is being used to calculate the maximum number of allowable units. I would request that after looking closely at the plan, you take the time to drive the route, visit this site, walk the property, and seriously reconsider approving this development as it is. First of all, there are 1.3 acres of unusable land because it sits within the Coachella Stormwater Channel. The 40 units will be stuffed onto 3.22 acres! While this may be ‘legal’ it does not make sense for this parcel given its location. If instead the net acreage was used, the maximum number of units would be 24, not 40! Is there no middle ground or common sense we can use in this case? In addition to the traffic issue, this density calculation causes a snowball effect as it relates to the site plan. Mr. Snellenburger states that due to the size and shape of the site, he was unable to find a design that would meet all the development standards for a multifamily project without a height variance. Mr. Snellenburger wants the rules changed to meet his needs. (LQMC Section 9.50.020, Height Limits and Setbacks Near Image Corridors, which stipulates that all buildings within 150 ft of the edge of right of way of general plan-designated image corridors shall be “limited to one story, not to exceed 22 feet in height”). This may seem like a small request, but it is not. It will impact the existing buildings as well as change the landscape for the Indian Springs golf course homes. I do know in the past, La Quinta did not grant these variances to builders whether it be a remodel or new build, and I request that you do the same in this case--variances should not be easily granted and should be an exception, not the rule. There are no 2-story buildings in the city of La Quinta along the Jefferson Street corridor and it should remain that way.I’d like for you to be consistent with your rules and just say no. Mr Snellenberg needs to stick with the one story rule! According to the Parking Data, Mr Snellenberger is providing the absolute minimum number of parking spaces CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JENNIFER HILL PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF JEFFERSON ST APARTMENTS required! How is this even possible? Have you looked at the proposed square footage of the units? They certainly aren’t small! We all know there is never enough parking in an apartment complex and based on location and surrounding areas, there isn’t even any street parking available. I’d like you to really look at that parking lot and consider the nightmare it will be to move around given the design and one entrance/exit. Because of the desire to pack these buildings into such a small space, the architectural plan has the trash in very close proximity to the existing condominium buildings. They actually back right up to the east wall. During the Planning Commission meeting when asked about this by one of the commissioners, the architect explained it was for the ease of the trash truck--the trash truck, not people! I'm not sure about you, but when our summer temperatures reach 120 degrees, the smell of a dumpster near the building is not desirable whether there is a 6 foot wall or not. This plan is not considerate of the neighbors, even though he would like you to believe he left the middle open for parking, pools and trash as to not impede the existing view, I’d like to assert the plan is the way it is because it’s the only way he can squeeze a maximum number of buildings with a minimum number of parking spaces and still stay minimally compliant. Not a good look for the Gem of the Desert. Although the plan attempts to assuage you into believing that this is the best he can do given the shape and size of this parcel, Mr. Snellenberger can do better. I have watched and listened to this council meet, re-meet, hold special meetings to discuss the impact your decisions have of our city. You have spent numerous meetings discussing the plans for the Jefferson St and Ave 50 corner’s architecture, aesthetics, and entrances. You have sent the developers back to the drawing board numerous times. I am not in disagreement that we need affordable housing, but I’m asking you to give the same attention to this project, as you have for the corner which impacts the wealthier side of our city. Mr. Snellenberger did not attempt to blend in with surroundings; not in his color scheme, not with the modern architecture, nor with the density. There is no plan to address the impact that 104 cars will have on traffic. This is a golf course community; single family, single story, classic desert in elevation and color. The homes on both sides of Jefferson street will be impacted, not just our Westward Isle condominium community. Traffic will be greatly impacted, which will in turn cause surrounding businesses, neighborhoods and schools to be directly affected. Mr. Snellenberger is asking a lot of this council. His plan includes architecture that is not in keeping with surrounding single family homes, pushes zoning allowance per acre, increases traffic congestion, and in order to make his plan work, is asking you to change the rules to fit his needs. The development plan needs improvement! Please ask Mr. Snellenberger resubmit a proposal that won’t stick out like a sore thumb, takes the current residents into consideration by reducing the proposed height to one-story as stipulated by LQMC Section 9.50.020, reducing the number of units to take into account the usable land that will allow for considerate trash location, and address the ingress-egress as it relates to the impact of Jefferson Street traffic. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Hill CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JENNIFER HILL PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF JEFFERSON ST APARTMENTS 1 From:Vicki Vince Sent:Friday, February 5, 2021 3:23 PM To:Monika Radeva Subject:Fwd: STVRs & Proposed Apartment Complex on Jefferson Street Attachments:CityCouncil.docx EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Ms. Radeva, Would you kindly forward my e‐mail to the Planning Commission? I attempted to e‐mail the members indivdually, but with no succes. Thanking you in advance. Vicki Please take the time to read my attached letter. It is lengthy, I apologize. Maybe you can print it and read it with your coffee tomorrow! Thank you, Vicki M. Vince‐Olsen CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT VICKI VINCE-OLSEN PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF PROPOSED JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT February 2, 2021 Dear Mayor Evans, City Council Members, and Planning Commission, Thank you, thank you, and THANK YOU for the amazing presentation last week about the STVRs. You, the City Mayor and Staff, were so steadfast in providing the public with a plethora of much‐needed information and got the meeting concluded – as late as it was! I personally very much appreciated it, as I came away from that meeting with a better attitude. I found the discussion among the Mayor and City Council to be super informative. I wanted to write to each and every one of you to thank you for that, you are troopers! Additionally, I want to follow up on the STVR issue from my perspective, as well as the proposed apartment complex on Jefferson. I am still very much AGAINST STVRs in our city and would like to see them phased out within the next few years. I think the residents have spoken and really need your backing. The changes and suggestions by the study are great if we take a bandage approach to the STVRs – which may lead to continued problems and possible litigation. Currently there is a permitted 5+ bedroom “estate” (79‐915 Horseshoe Road) STVR on my cul‐ de‐sac, and another “estate” (79‐925 Horseshoe Road) right next to it, waiting to get a permit. Both backyards face Fiesta Drive, overlooking the 11th fairway…party row. The currently permitted STVR on my street now has “Visitor Parking” signs in his driveway, along with huge shower curtains covering the front door. It’s so unsightly and looks ridiculous. You’ve heard the complaints; you’ve seen the videos and pictures. I need not say more. Just understand, we are not in the Cove, we are not PGA, we are just a small section of La Quinta with over 7.7% of our homes running as STVRs. Please help us! I have been listening very closely to the City Council meetings, as well as the most recent Planning Commission meeting. I live in a home overlooking the 10th fairway of Indian Springs County Club, what used to be the old Westward Ho Golf Course. My backyard overlooks the golf course and JEFFERSON, right at the spot where the 40‐unit apartment complex is seeking approval. I grew up in the Westward Ho neighborhood (back when it was Indio!), went to Indio High School, moved to Orange County for school and stayed there until two years ago, when I moved back to our beautiful desert. I bought the home right next door to my mom, who still lives in my childhood home.সহ঺঻ CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT VICKI VINCE-OLSEN PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF PROPOSED JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT Obviously, the STVR situation on Fiesta and Horseshoe Road affects our neighborhood, as does the possible approval of the apartment complex on Jefferson. Regarding the apartment complex, it is my understanding that the City of La Quinta owns the property there at Jefferson and Palm Circle. This parcel is always very well‐maintained and looks lovely, a nice piece of classic desert landscape as you pass through the area. Jefferson is a main artery throughout our desert, people from various desert cities and various events (such as Coachella, Stagecoach, concerts, tennis, golf, etc.) use Jefferson to access Interstate 10. Because Jefferson is a main thoroughfare, Jefferson was widened several years ago, at the expense of homeowners on the opposite side of Jefferson. One of those homes belonged to my late grandparents, Bena and Jack Vince. Their home was destroyed, along with several others, and Jefferson was ultimately widened to meet the needs of our city. Jefferson is now a very, very busy and loud street at all hours of the day and night. If you do not believe me, I welcome you all to visit my backyard for a morning cup of java or and evening cocktail! Fast forward to Mr. Snellenberg’s proposed project – First and foremost, this project most definitely DOES conflict with the esthetics, peace and enjoyment and traffic layout of the residential homes/condos currently in the area. This project is also a slap in the face to the homeowners who gave up the rights to their property to widen Jefferson. Truly! How can the city, with a conscience, allow a complex to go up in an area where homes were destroyed to widen the road? This makes absolutely no sense! From what I heard in the January 26 Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Snellenberg’s project needs a height variance and certain exceptions and/or exemptions to get this project approved. Why would his project (which I say looks like a jail) be privy to special favors from the City when in all reality there are so many other pieces of property in La Quinta that would be way better suited for this project that would NOT NEED exceptions/exemptions? This piece of property should remain beautiful and apartment free. Imagine being a condo owner on the backside of the apartment complex…this apartment building would be so close to them and disrupt their peace and quiet and most definitely their views. Oh, and the trash...the smell of the trash bins that would be in close proximity – yuck! In 118‐degree weather those bins will STINK and be a constant problem for the condo owners. Another reason so just say, “no.” As Mr. Snellenberg, himself, said it would be very costly to get the water and electricity routed to the project…image the traffic nightmares during construction and thereafter. Home Depot would end up with an exorbitant amount of traffic making U‐turns in their parking lot. Another reason to say, “no.” CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT VICKI VINCE-OLSEN PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF PROPOSED JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT The long and short of it: This project is not in keeping with the single‐family homes in the surrounding neighborhoods, as the complex looks like a jail as opposed to classic desert‐scape, it does not align with the current zoning allowance per acre, takes away another piece of beautiful landscape on a main thoroughfare, and INCREASES traffic congestion on an already terribly busy street. I am vehemently opposed to this and would hope the City of La Quinta DOES NOT allow this project to move forward. I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to read my letter and I am looking forward to a more peaceful La Quinta soon! Vicki M. Vince‐Olsen CITY COUNCIL MEETING – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT VICKI VINCE-OLSEN PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - IN OPPOSITION OF PROPOSED JEFFERSON ST. APARTMENTS PROJECT