Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2021 03 02 Council
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 of 7 MARCH 2, 2021 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021 3:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION | 4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION ****************************** SPECIAL NOTICE Teleconferencing and Telephonic Accessibility In Effect Pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, N-33-20, N-35-20, and N-60- 20 executed by the Governor of California, in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.), members of the City Council, the City Manager, City Attorney, City Staff, and City Consultants may participate in this regular meeting by teleconference. Additionally, pursuant to the above-referenced executive orders, members of the public temporarily are not permitted to physically attend at City Hall the meeting to which this agenda applies, but any member of the public may listen or participate in the open session of this meeting as specified below. Members of the public wanting to listen to the open session of the meeting may do so by tuning-in live via http://laquinta.12milesout.com/video/live. Members of the public wanting to address the City Council during the open session, either for public comment or for a specific agenda item, or both, are requested to send an email notification to the La Quinta City Clerk’s Office at CityClerkMail@LaQuintaCA.gov, and specify the following information: 1) Full Name 4) Public Comment or Agenda Item Number 2) City of Residence 5) Subject 3) Phone Number 6) Written or Telephonic Verbal Comments City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City’s web page: www.LaQuintaCA.gov CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 – PULLED FROM THE AGENDA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 of 7 MARCH 2, 2021 The email “subject line” must clearly state “Written Comments” or “Telephonic Verbal Comments.” Telephonic verbal public comments – requests to speak must be emailed to the City Clerk no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and general public for the item(s) by contacting him/her via phone and queuing him/her to speak. Only one person at a time may speak by telephone and only after being recognized by the Mayor. Written public comments must be received by the City Clerk’s Office no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City Council, incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk’s Office can accommodate such request. It would be appreciated that any email communications for public comments related to the items on the agenda, or for general public comment, are provided to the City Clerk’s Office at the email address listed above prior to the commencement of the meeting. If that is not possible, and to accommodate public comments on items that may be added to the agenda after its initial posting or items that are on the agenda, every effort will be made to attempt to review emails received by the City Clerk’s Office during the course of the meeting. The Mayor will endeavor to take a brief pause before action is taken on any agenda item to allow the City Clerk to review emails and share any public comments received during the meeting. All emails received by the City Clerk, at the email address above, until the adjournment of the meeting, will be included within the public record relating to the meeting. ****************************** CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda by emailing written public comments or requests to provide verbal telephonic public comments as indicated above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 of 7 MARCH 2, 2021 shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by Government Code § 54954.2(b). CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION 1. THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (a) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. CONSULTATION WITH: ALEXANDER JOHNSTON, SENIOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR; WILLIAM H. IHRKE, CITY ATTORNEY (Review Continued Need and Response to Proclaimed State and Local Emergencies Caused by COVID-19) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTIONS(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda by emailing written public comments or requests to provide verbal telephonic public comments as indicated above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by Government Code § 54954.2(b). ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - NONE CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES DATED JANUARY 19, 2021 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 of 7 MARCH 2, 2021 2. Pulled for a separate vote by Councilmember Peña >>> ACCEPT LA QUINTA VILLAGE COMPLETE STREETS A ROAD DIET PROJECT NO. 2015-03/151603 19 3. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE MONROE STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 2020-01, LOCATED BETWEEN AVENUE 52 TO AVENUE 53, AND NEAR AVENUE 61 25 4. Pulled from the Agenda by City Staff >>> AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO UTILIZE DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION FOR UP TO $150,000 OF WORK FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21, WHEN DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION IS THE QUALIFIED AND/OR LOWEST BIDDER 29 5. RECEIVE AND FILE SECOND QUARTER 2020/21 TREASURY REPORTS FOR OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, AND DECEMBER 2020 31 6. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 2020 79 7. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO REAFFIRM ADOPTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152; AUTHORIZE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TO CONTINUE TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS; AND INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE COUNTY HARMLESS FOR LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON CITY PARCELS [RESOLUTION NO. 2021-003] 85 8. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED FEBRUARY 12 AND 19, 2021 91 BUSINESS SESSION PAGE 1. CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 16, 2021: INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 11.100 TO THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO A POLICY WITH OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM; AND APPROVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CITYWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM [ORDINANCE NO. 589] 107 2. CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 25, 2021: INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS [ORDINANCE NO. 590] 121 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 of 7 MARCH 2, 2021 PUBLIC HEARINGS – after 5:00 p.m. For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed “Request to Speak” form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or speak via teleconference in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. PAGE 1. CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 25, 2021: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CITY’S SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM PERMIT FEES [RESOLUTION NO. 2021-004] 143 2. CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 15, 2020: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0006, AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 AMENDMENT NO. 2, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PROPOSING AN APPROXIMATE 125,000 SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER WITH DRIVE-THROUGHS AND A 63,000 SQUARE-FOOT SUPERMARKET WITH ASSOCIATED VEHICLE FUEL CENTER; CEQA: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 50 AND JEFFERSON STREET; PROJECT: PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER [RESOLUTION NOS. 2021-005 AND 2021-006] 157 STUDY SESSION PAGE 1. DISCUSS PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 THROUGH 2025/26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 413 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY RESOURCES 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6 of 7 MARCH 2, 2021 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC WORKS MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 6. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 7. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 8. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Radi) 9. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (Fitzpatrick) 10 GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 11. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Radi) 12. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Peña) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 14. SILVERROCK EVENT SITE AD HOC COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 15. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Sanchez) 16. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Peña) 17. CVAG VALLEY-WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Peña) 18. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE (Peña) 19. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT – ENERGY CONSUMERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (Peña) 20. COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS EMERGENCY ECONOMIC RELIEF PROGRAM AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Radi) 21. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Radi) 22. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Radi) 23. CITYWIDE SECURITY CAMERAS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Radi) 24. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Radi & Sanchez) 25. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 26. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC WORKS POLICY COMMITTEE (Sanchez) 27. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 28. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES DATED NOVEMBER 24, 2020 429 29. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES DATED DECEMBER 8, 2020 435 ADJOURNMENT ********************************* CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 7 of 7 MARCH 2, 2021 The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on March 16, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk, of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City’s website, near the entrance to the Council Chambers at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at the Stater Brothers Supermarket at 78630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on February 12, 2021. DATED: February 26, 2021 MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777- 7092, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777-7092. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the Councilmembers during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Community Development counter at City Hall located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2021 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Evans. This meeting provided teleconference accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, N-33-20, N-35-20, and N-60-20 executed by the Governor of California, and the directives under the “Regional Stay At Home Order” from the California Department of Public Health, in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code §54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: City Manager McMillen, City Attorney Ihrke, City Clerk Radeva, Deputy City Clerk Romane, Finance Director Romero, Senior Accountant Martinez, Senior Planner Flores, Design and Development Director, City Senior Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Community Resources Director Escobedo, Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney, and Assistant to the City Manager Villalpando. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA – None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA City Manager McMillen requested to pull Consent Calendar Item No. 7 from consideration on tonight’s agenda. Councilmember Peña said he will abstain from the vote on Consent Calendar Item No. 9 due to a potential conflict of interest stemming from the proximity of real property to the project location. Council concurred. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 CLOSED SESSION 1. THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (a) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. CONSULTATION WITH: ALEXANDER JOHNSTON, SENIOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR; WILLIAM H. IHRKE, CITY ATTORNEY (Review Continued Need and Response to Proclaimed State and Local Emergencies Caused by COVID-19) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (QUARTERLY REVIEW) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957, COUNCIL APPOINTED POSITION – CITY MANAGER COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 3:02 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4:06 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihrke reported the following pursuant to Government Code Section 54950 et seq. (Brown Act): CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 1 – the City Council continued its review of the status of the threat to public services and facilities relating to the state and local public health emergencies caused by COVID-19 and the City’s responses to limit the general spread of the virus and took the following action: MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Mayor Evans/Councilmember Fitzpatrick directing and authorizing the City Manager to amend Executive Order No. 10 and extend the moratorium on accepting new applications for short-term vacation rental (STVR) permits until April 6, 2021. Motion passed: ayes – 4, noes – 1 (Sanchez), abstain – 0. Council will reconvene into Closed Session after the Open Session of the meeting to continue its discussion of Closed Session Item No. 1. 10 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 •CLOSED SESSION ITEM NOs. 2 and 3 – Council will consider these items after the Open Session portion of the meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Sanchez led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA Mayor Evans said the following WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS, listed in alphabetical order, were received as of 4:00 p.m., which were distributed to Council, made publicly available, and incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting: Marcia Cutchin, La Quinta – in opposition of STVRs; Arlene Gotshalk, La Quinta – related to STVRs; Mary Jo McCowan, La Quinta – in opposition of STVRs and requested that the moratorium on new STVR permits be extended; Judith Neid, La Quinta – in opposition of STVRs and requested that the moratorium on new STVR permits be extended; Robin and Bob Nenninger, La Quinta – in opposition of STVRs and requested that the moratorium on new STVR permits be extended; and Craig and Marie Thompson, La Quinta – in opposition of STVRs and requested that the moratorium on new STVR permits be extended. The City Clerk will continue to monitor emails for any additional written comments or requests to speak via telephonic accessibility through the adjournment of the meeting. The following PUBLIC SPEAKERS provided verbal comments via TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY, listed in the order in which they spoke: Pa ula Simonds, CEO with Family YMCA of the Desert located in Palm Desert, California – thanked the City for the opportunity for the YMCA to utilize the La Quinta Museum as a facility to provide childcare to essential workers and distant learning programing from April to December 2020; said through its partnership with the City, the YMCA will continue to provide these services starting in January 2021 at the Adams Elementary School; explained the type of programs being offered; and noted the importance of these services to the community; Jim Lambert, La Quinta – noted the travel and lodging restriction in effect due to COVID-19 are not being followed by STVR operators, implored the Council to extend the moratorium on accepting new STVR permits, and urged the Council to ban STVRs from residential neighborhoods; 11 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 Jelena Tamm, La Quinta/Newport Beach – said she was speaking on behalf of the VRON-LQ organization, asked Council to consider lifting the moratorium on accepting new STVR permits, and noted that there have been reports that Code Compliance is checking STVR properties without reported complaints; Olivier Chaine, La Quinta – said that Code Compliance is checking STVR properties without reported complaints, and asked the Council to look into this matter and ensure that STVR compliance and enforcement are deployed consistently; Betty Ortiz, La Quinta – said STVRs are adversely affecting the character of residential neighborhoods; Marcia Cutchin, La Quinta – said approximately 300 STVR properties in La Quinta were booked via an “instant-book” option offered by hosting platforms (such as AirBNB) which does not allow STVR operators to screen renters prior to confirming the booking, and urged the Council to impose a permanent moratorium on new STVR permits and to establish a cap on the number of STVR permits allowed under this program; Paul Quill, La Quinta – said he is in opposition of STVRs, and noted some residents have placed temporary signs in their yards stating “Neighborhoods are for Neighbors, not STVRs,” and some of these signs were removed by City staff without notifying the homeowners or providing an explanation of the reasons for removal; City Manager McMillen explained the City has been receiving complaints from residents that these signs were being placed in medians, abandoned properties, and the public right-of-way, which resulted in Code Compliance review of this matter in the same manner in which temporary campaign signs are reviewed, and signs that did not comply with the placement requirements as established by the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) were removed to ensure safety and compliance. Arlene Gotshalk, La Quinta – thanked the Council for extending the moratorium on accepting new STVR applications, and asked Council to phase-out STVRs in non-gated residential areas and to increase the STVR permit fee. City Clerk Radeva said additional WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS were received by resident Marty Butler, providing a petition signed by residents of the Rancho Ocotillo residential neighborhood in opposition of STVRs being allowed in their neighborhood; these comments were distributed to Council, made publicly 12 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 available, and incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 17, 2020 2. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 1, 2020 3. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 15, 2020 4. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED DECEMBER 11, 18, 2020 AND JANUARY 1, 2021 5. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED OCTOBER 31, 2020 6. EXCUSE ABSENCE FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONER MCCUNE FROM THE NOVEMBER 24, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 7. pulled from consideration by City Staff >>> ACCEPT OFF-SITE AND ON- SITE IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH PARCEL MAP NO. 37683, RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTT, LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 111 AND NORTH OF VISTA CORALINA LANE 8. APPROVE UTILITY AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT FOR THE DUNE PALMS ROAD BRIDGE PROJECT 2011-05/111205 FOR RELOCATION AND THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING ELECTRICAL FACILITIES 9. ACCEPT FRITZ BURNS PARK SIDEWALK AND PARKING PROJECT NO. 2017-22, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FRANCIS HACK LANE ADJACENT TO THE SKATE PARK MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Peña/Fitzpatrick to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-6 and 8, as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 Councilmember Peña said he would abstain from voting on Consent Calendar Item No. 9 due to a potential conflict of interest stemming from the proximity of real property to the project location. 13 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Radi to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 9, as recommended. Motion passed: ayes 4, noes 0, abstain 1 (Peña). BUSINESS SESSION 1. RECEIVE AND FILE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 Finance Director Romero, Senior Accountant Martinez, and City Consultant Lauryn Stapleton, Senior Manager with Eide Bailly LLP presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. Council commended Staff and the auditors for the timely filing of the CAFR, positioning La Quinta to receive a high financial solvency ranking and move to position no. 5 from 18 within the state of California. Finance Director Romero explained the California State Auditor’s Office ranks all cities within the state based on general fund reserves, the debt burden the City carries, liquidity of the City’s assets, the diversity of revenue trends, addressing the City’s pension obligations, the City’s current and future pension costs, and the City’s Other Post-Employee Benefits (OPEB); Ms. Romero noted that funding the City’s OPEB and pension obligations was critical in moving the City’s ranking up, as well as the adoption of an award-winning Reserve Policy and funding the identified reserves; and mentioned Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage, and Palm Desert also ranked in the top 10. Council discussed the City’s Redevelopment Agency annual loan repayment by the state, due to be completed in 2031; and noted the vigilant efforts of Staff, the oversight of the Financial Advisory Commission, and the City’s conservative approach in its long-term planning, vision, and goals are the reasons which ensure the City remains fiscally solvent going forward. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Radi to receive and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2020. Motion passed unanimously. STUDY SESSION – None PUBLIC HEARINGS – After 5:00 p.m. 1. INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SEVERAL SECTIONS OF TITLE 9 ZONING OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO STREAMLINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 14 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 AND STANDARDS; CEQA: EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B)(3) REVIEW FOR EXEMPTIONS – COMMON SENSE RULE; LOCATION: CITYWIDE [ORDINANCE NO. 588] Senior Planner Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. Council discussed the need to revise the language under LQMC Section 9.60.310, subsections (A) and (B) related to resort residential to clarify that this use is not restricted to tourist and resort activity only when it is a “part of a golf/resort country club” to allow for greater flexibility for future developments; the LQMC does not require that there be a clubhouse or a centralized facility servicing the residences in order to establish a neighborhood as resort residential; difference in requirements between “accessory dwelling units” (ADU) and a “junior ADU.” MAYOR EVANS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 5:42 P.M. PUBLIC SPEAKER – None Council discussed the ability to allow “tiny-homes” in La Quinta would be subject to meeting the minimum livable area requirements, architectural design, and building regulations per the LQMC; exploring the ability to provide code provisions allowing the minimum livable area requirements to be met utilizing an aggregate approach; trending changes in housing needs and preferences; under the City’s affordable housing regulations, greater flexibility in zoning standards is allowed; the need to revise the language under LQMC Section 9.60.030(A) related to rear and side yard fencing requirements and ability to allow exemptions subject to adjoining property owners waiver, when the fence abuts open space, such as golf course, lake front, or similar area, or the City approves a Minor Use Permit for an alternative approach; a “tiny-home” can be built as an ADU; state regulations require ADUs to be rented for terms longer than 30 days, and this requirement is incorporated into LQMC Section 9.60.090(C)(5); and different requirements between ADUs and guest houses. MAYOR EVANS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 6:02 P.M. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Peña/Radi, to make a finding, included in Ordinance No. 588, that adopting this ordinance, as amended, is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) Review of Exemptions – Common Sense Rule and is consistent with the previously approved General Plan 2035 Environmental Impact Report. Motion passed unanimously. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Peña/Radi to move to take up Ordinance No. 588 by title and number only and waive further 15 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 reading as proposed and incorporating the following language amendments and additions: Add language to Section 9.60.030 Fences and wall, subsection (A) as noted below in blue: “A. Purpose. For purposes of this section, “fence” or “wall” means any type of fence, wall, retaining wall, sound attenuation wall, screen or windscreen. The terms “fence” and “wall” are used interchangeably in this section to mean any or all of the preceding structures. Rear and side yards shall be completely enclosed and screened by view-obscuring fencing, wall, or combinations, unless: 1) Adjoining property owners waive the rear or side yard fencing requirements; or 2) The fence abuts open space, such as golf course, lake front, or similar areas; or 3) A Minor Use Permit is approved by the Design and Development Director for an alternative approach.” Amend the language in Section 9.60.310 Resort residential, subsections (A) and (B) as noted below in blue: “A. Purpose. Resort residential provides for the development and regulation of a range of specialized residential uses that are individually owned but rented for periods of thirty consecutive days or less, on a regular basis and oriented to tourist and resort activity as part of a golf/resort country club. Land uses include single-family detached or attached residential uses, eating and drinking facilities, small accessory retail and personal service shops, and recreational buildings. B. Review Process. Resort residential uses are permitted when developed as part of a residential golf country club. Motion passed unanimously. City Clerk Radeva read the following title of Ordinance No. 588 into the record: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO STREAMLINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND STANDARDS (ZOA 2020-0001) MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Peña/Radi to introduce at first reading Ordinance No. 588 as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS All reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. 16 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS Councilmember Fitzpatrick commended Staff for the well organized and attended 8th Annual Community Workshop held on Saturday, January 16, 2021. Mayor Evans echoed Councilmember Fitzpatrick’s comments above related to the Community Workshop and requested that Staff prepare a summary departmental report on the workshop for the next Council meeting. Mayor Evans said the Riverside County Planning Commission approved the proposed Vista Santa Rosa Gateway Project located in Riverside County, and within the City’s sphere of influence, and the project will be moving forward for consideration by the County’s Board of Supervisors at a future date. Mayor Evans noted that the City Council will hold a Special Council Meeting on Wednesday, January 27, 2021, beginning at 5 p.m., to continue its review and consideration of the STVR Program Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and to receive and hear public testimony from the La Quinta community; and thanked the community’s input and engagement. Councilmember Peña said the League of California Cities Riverside County Division recently held a meeting and presented an update on legislation, re- districting, and the 2020 census; and requested that the City Attorney or Staff follow-up with information on that presentation. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS La Quinta’s representative for 2020, Mayor Evans reported on her participation in the following organizations’ meetings: CVAG COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION COMMISSION CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE La Quinta’s representative for 2020, Councilmember Fitzpatrick reported on her participation in the following organizations’ meetings: COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) La Quinta’s representative for 2020, Councilmember Peña reported on his participation in the following organization’s meeting: IID ENERGY CONSUMERS’ ADVISORY COMMITTEE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE 17 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10 of 10 JANUARY 19, 2021 La Quinta’s representative for 2020, Councilmember Sanchez reported on his participation in the following organization’s meeting: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC WORKS POLICY COMMITTEE COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 6:26 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:54 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihrke reported the following pursuant to Government Code Section 54950 et seq. (Brown Act): CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 1 – no additional actions taken. CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – no actions taken. CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 3 – the Council completed its quarterly review of the City Manager. Additional WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS, listed in alphabetical order, were received between 4:00 p.m. and the adjournment of the meeting, which were distributed to Council, made publicly available, and incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting: Bill and Terri Butler, La Quinta – in opposition of short-term vacation rentals (STVRs); Judy Hoffman, La Quinta – in opposition of STVRs; and Jim Lambert, La Quinta – related to STVRs and lack of compliance with COVID-19 regulations. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Fitzpatrick to adjourn at 7:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 18 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ACCEPT LA QUINTA VILLAGE COMPLETE STREETS A ROAD DIET PROJECT NO. 2015-03/151603 RECOMMENDATION Accept the La Quinta Village Complete Streets Project No. 2015-03/151603 as complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $435,710, thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The project transformed the La Quinta Village by reducing the number of travel lanes on Calle Tampico, Calle Sinaloa and Eisenhower Drive from four to two to accommodate bike, golf cart and Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) lanes; converting four-way intersections to roundabouts; and providing pedestrian and bicycle friendly facilities (Attachment 1). •The work is complete and Council acceptance will close the contract and allow final payment. FISCAL IMPACT The following identifies the Project funding sources: Funding Source Amount ATP Grant $ 7,313,100 Measure A Funds $ 1,341,890 SB1/RMRA $ 1,342,530 Infrastructure Fund $ 22,618 Transportation DIF $ 430,000 CVWD Rebate $ 49,900 Measure G $ 1,972,158 APP Fund* $ 95,000 Total Revenue: $ 12,567,196 *APP funds will remain available for future art installation within Project roundabouts CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 19 The following is the financial accounting for Project No. 2015-03/151603: Original Contract Amount $ 8,115,118 Contract Change Order No. 1 - 17 $ 599,091 Final Contract Amount $ 8,714,209 Project Budget $12,567,196 Final Contract Amount ($ 8,714,209) Design, Professional, & Personnel Costs ($ 1,690,597) Right of Way Acquisition ($ 31,194) Inspection, Testing, Survey, Construction Management ($ 1,544,414) APP funding to be saved for future art in roundabouts ($ 95,000) Anticipated Funds Remaining* $ 491,782 * All costs to date have been accounted for and no further costs are anticipated. There are adequate funds to close this project; The final retention amount of $435,710 will be paid from account number 401-0000-20600. The anticipated savings ($491,782) will remain available for future eligible projects. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 4, 2019, Council awarded an $8,115,118 contract to Granite Construction Company. On July 31, 2019, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a 360-working day completion time starting on August 5, 2019 and ending on January 15, 2021. The project was deemed substantially complete on January 12, 2021. No liquidated damages or early completion incentives are recommended. A summary of Contract Change Orders are as follows: Contract Change Order No. Contract Change Order Description Cost or Savings Amount CCO 001 Storm Drain Line A – Replacement of RCP with C900 PVC $24,452 CCO 002 Mill and Overlay for Drainage in Tampico Bike Lanes 0.1’ $24,974 CCO 003 CVWD Water Main Break $14,286 CCO 004 CVWD Shaft Raising $32,895 CCO 005 Eliminate Trap Lane, Bio-Retention Curb, Irrigation Controller $41,904 CCO 006 Alternative Decorative Crosswalks ($98,731) CCO 007 Mill Overlay Pulverize Sinaloa 52 $141,876 CCO 008 Adjust Storm Drain Manhole and Remove Driveway $7,635 CCO 009 Desert Club Drainage Issues $39,216 20 CCO 010 Additional Phase 2 Striping and Signage $1,652 CCO 011 Avenida Martinez Mill and Overlay 0.2' $10,409 CCO 012 Old Town Landscape Adjustments $8,892 CCO 013 Signage Revisions $3,621 CCO 014 AB5 Additional Trucking Costs $4,548 CCO 015 Time & Materials Adjustments $285,754 CCO 016 Traffic Control Credit ($5,770) CCO 017 Balancing Change Order (Quantity Adjustments) $61,478 Total Contract Change Orders: $599,091 The project construction effort is complete and in compliance with the plans and specifications. Staff recommends acceptance and release of the retention thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. In compliance with the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Grant requirements, final pedestrian and bicycle counts will be conducted, and an ATP Close Out Report will be submitted. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 21 22 23 24 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE MONROE STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 2020-01, LOCATED BETWEEN AVENUE 52 TO AVENUE 53, AND NEAR AVENUE 61 RECOMMENDATION Approve plans, specifications, engineer’s estimate, and authorize Staff to bid the Monroe Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2020-01, located between Avenue 52 to Avenue 53 and near Avenue 61. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •This project is located at two locations (Attachment 1): o Monroe Street from Avenue 52 to Avenue 53 – pulverization, crack fill, and slurry seal the existing pavement on the south bound side of the street. o Monroe Street from Avenue 61 to approximately 325 feet north of Avenue 61– pulverization of the existing pavement. FISCAL IMPACT This project is allocated in the 2020/2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) utilizing $941,000, of which $257,902 is allocated from Measure A Funding and $683,098 from SB1 Road Maintenance Funding. The following is the project budget: Total Budget Professional: $ 56,223 Design: $ 68,223 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 63,517 Construction: $ 550,000 Contingency: $ 203,037 Total Budget: $ 941,000 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 25 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS After receiving many resident concerns, a Geotechnical Report (Report) was prepared for Monroe Street between Avenue 52 to Avenue 53 and near Avenue 61.The Report recommended to complete a full depth pavement reconstruction between Avenue 52 and Mountain Spur Drive and from Avenue 61 to approximately 325 feet north of Avenue 61. A crack fill and slurry seal are recommended between Mountain Spur Drive and Avenue 53. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on March 2, 2021, the following is the project schedule: Council Bid Authorization March 2, 2021 Bid Period March 3, 2021 to March 30, 2021 Council Considers Project Award April 6, 2021 Execute Contract and Mobilize April 7 to April 30, 2021 Construction (50 Working Days) May to July 2021 Accept Improvements August 2021 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 26 *IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. © Riverside County GIS Legend REPORT PRINTED ON...2/7/2019 11:38:16 AM Vicinity Map Monroe Street Pavement Rehabilitation 0 12,0376, 019 Feet Blueline Streams City Areas World Street Map ATTACHMENT 1 27 28 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO UTILIZE DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION FOR UP TO $150,000 OF WORK FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21, WHEN DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION IS THE QUALIFIED AND/OR LOWEST BIDDER RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Public Works Department to utilize Desert Concepts Construction for up to $150,000 during fiscal year 2020/21 when Desert Concepts Construction is the qualified and/or low bidder. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Per the purchasing policy, amounts paid to vendors/contractors over $50,000 must be approved by Council. •Desert Concepts Construction (Desert Concepts) provides quality work, will bid prevailing wage projects, has sufficient staff, and resources to perform a variety of services for the City. •Staff requests authorization to utilize Desert Concepts for up to $150,000 of work should Desert Concepts submit a qualified and/or lowest bid. FISCAL IMPACT The $150,000 would be charged in increments, as needed, to the appropriate account(s) should Desert Concepts be awarded any other bids in 2020/21. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The purchasing policy requires Council approval for purchases and/or contracts over $50,000. To date in FY 2020/21 the City has utilized Desert Concepts for a variety of services totaling $46,150. Desert Concepts has a history of providing quality work and will bid prevailing wage projects. The City frequently utilizes them for services such as 29 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 ITEM PULLED FROM AGENDA construction, concrete sidewalk repairs, HVAC, electrical, plumbing, landscape, and other tasks including emergency repairs. Staff requests authorization to utilize Desert Concepts for up to $150,000 of work should Desert Concepts be the qualified and/or low bidder during FY 2020/21 where each project would be subject to the City’s current purchasing policy. ALTERNATIVES Staff could request Council’s approval for any future work awarded to Desert Concepts on a per project basis, however, that approach would delay work schedules. Prepared by: Dianne Hansen, Management Analyst, Parks/Landscape Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/ City Engineer 30 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE SECOND QUARTER 2020/21 TREASURY REPORTS FOR OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, AND DECEMBER 2020 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the second quarter fiscal year 2020/21 Treasury Reports for October, November, and December 2020. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Commentary and Summary of Significant Activity The total book value of the portfolio decreased $4.43 million, from $154.03 million at the end of September to $149.60 million at the end of December. The decrease reflects operational activity throughout the quarter. The portfolio is within policy limits for investment types and total allocation by type (see chart below), and is also within policy guidelines for investment ratings. Investment Type October November December Max Allowed Bank Accounts 1.92% 2.39% 4.86% 100% Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) City 37.49% 36.61% 35.61% (1) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Housing 10.83% 10.76% 7.05% (1)(2) Money Market 0.16% 0.16% 0.33% 20% Money Market Pool Accounts-CAMP 1.87% 1.86% 0.57% 20% Federal Agency Coupons 9.83% 10.42% 12.71% 100% Treasury Coupons 6.49% 6.45% 6.63% 100% Certificates of Deposit (CD's)21.89% 21.60% 22.02% 30% Corporate Notes 1.53% 1.52% 1.56% 30% Money Market with Fiscal Agent 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (2) CERBT- OPEB Trust 1.17% 1.16% 1.29% (3) PARS Pension Trust 6.82% 7.07% 7.37% (3) Total 100% 100% 100% (3) OPEB and pension trusts are fiduciary accounts and not subject to City Investment Policy (1) LAIF is subject to maximum dollar amount not a percentage of the portfolio (2) Funds held by fiscal agent and the LAIF Housing funds are governed by bond indentures and not subject to City Investment Policy Portfolio Allocations CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 31 The market continued to react to the political climate, economic news, and ongoing concerns around the worldwide Coronavirus pandemic; staff works continually with the City’s brokers to stay abreast of market conditions. The fiscal year annual effective rate of return is 1.07% as of December, a 6 basis point (bps) decrease since September (Q1). Throughout the quarter, three CDs matured and seven agency bonds were purchased. Maturities and purchases are listed in detail in the attached reports. Other Notes Money market funds with the fiscal agent are bond proceeds subject to bond indentures, not the City’s investment policy. Successor Agency (SA) funds cannot be invested long-term; therefore SA funds are only invested in LAIF. Looking Ahead The Treasurer follows a “buy and hold” Investment Policy, unless it is fiscally advantageous to actively trade outside of maturity dates. In the short term, the Treasurer will invest in CAMP and LAIF as needed. Longer term investments may include Government Sponsored Enterprise (agencies) securities, U.S. Treasuries, Corporate Notes, and Negotiable Certificates of Deposits. All investments recognize both immediate and long-term cash flow needs, and there is sufficient liquidity in the portfolio to meet expenditure requirements for the next six months. ALTERNATIVES - None Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Approved by: Karla Romero, Finance Director/City Treasurer Attachment: 1. Treasurer’s Report for October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 Total Earnings Average Days to Maturity Effective Rate of Return YTD October 131,748$ 373 1.09% November 128,023$ 369 1.08% December 127,750$ 401 1.07% Quarter 1 387,521$ 381 1.08% 32 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management October 31, 2020 City of La Quinta - Portfolio Summary % of Portfolio Book ValueInvestmentsMarket Value Par Value Days to MaturityTerm YTM 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 2,935,240.20 11.92 0.00012,935,240.202,935,240.20 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 57,275,840.36 137.49 0.620157,612,187.5657,275,840.36 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 16,545,147.29 110.83 0.620116,627,431.3016,545,147.29 Money Market/Mutual Funds 246,571.36 10.16 0.0001246,571.36246,571.36 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 2,853,430.22 11.87 0.19012,853,430.222,853,430.22 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 15,014,892.36 1,6009.83 1.3201,26615,399,429.5015,050,000.00 Treasury Coupon Securities 9,911,735.00 1,6536.49 1.50646810,153,265.0010,000,000.00 Certificate of Deposits 33,439,000.00 1,55421.89 2.16094834,958,107.9133,439,000.00 Corporate Notes 2,341,260.00 1,4361.53 2.7256522,473,059.002,400,000.00 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 29.27 10.00 0.000129.2729.27 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1,785,913.46 11.17 0.00011,785,913.461,785,913.46 PARS Pension Trust 10,416,785.70 16.82 0.000110,416,785.7010,416,785.70 152,765,845.22 100.00%Investments 155,461,450.48152,947,957.86 627 373 1.045 Current Year October 31 131,748.25 Fiscal Year To Date 597,530.08 Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 156,165,424.37 161,976,545.33 1.09%0.99% Total Earnings Month Ending I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. __________________________________________________ ____________________ Karla Romero, Finance Director Portfolio CITY CP Reporting period 10/01/2020-10/31/2020 Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:24 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 ATTACHMENT 1 33 Days to Maturity Page 1 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Bank Accounts 1Bank of New York1293 0.00 0.0009/01/2020 0.00 1SYS1293 0.000 1Bank of the West1228 2,212,787.36 2,212,787.3608/20/2019 2,212,787.36 1059731851 0.000 1City Petty Cash1059 3,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS1059 0.000 1La Quinta Palms Realty1062 265,528.67 265,528.6707/01/2016 265,528.67 1SYS1062 0.000 1Stifel, Nicolaus & Company1183 0.00 0.0003/18/2019 0.00 1SYS1183 0.000 1Wells Fargo1057 453,624.17 453,624.1707/01/2016 453,624.17 14159282482 0.000 2,935,240.20 12,935,240.202,935,240.207,127,442.24Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 1Local Agency Inv Fund1055 57,275,840.36 57,275,840.36 0.62057,612,187.56 198-33-434 0.620 57,275,840.36 157,612,187.5657,275,840.3656,377,643.16Subtotal and Average 1 0.620 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 1Local Agency Inv Fund1113 16,545,147.29 16,545,147.29 0.62016,627,431.30 125-33-005 0.620 16,545,147.29 116,627,431.3016,545,147.2916,529,289.45Subtotal and Average 1 0.620 Money Market/Mutual Funds 1Dreyfus1294246,571.36 246,571.3609/24/2020 246,571.36 1X9USDDTP3 0.000 246,571.36 1246,571.36246,571.36142,203.11Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 1California Asset Management Pr1153 2,853,430.22 2,853,430.22 0.19009/26/2018 2,853,430.22 1SYS1153 0.190 2,853,430.22 12,853,430.222,853,430.222,852,987.82Subtotal and Average 1 0.190 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 304Federal Farm Credit Bank1105 1,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 1,013,020.00 1,3923133EHWM1 1.913 674Federal National Mtg Assn1233 1,000,000.00 992,100.00 09/06/20221.37510/29/2019 1,022,050.00 1,0433135G0W33 1.659 697Federal Farm Credit Bank1247 1,000,000.00 999,217.36 09/29/20221.40002/05/2020 1,023,170.00 9673133EGWJ0 1.430 771Federal Farm Credit Bank1198 500,000.00 499,500.00 12/12/20221.87506/20/2019 517,730.00 1,2713133EKQP4 1.905 1,016Federal Farm Credit Bank1223 500,000.00 499,400.00 08/14/20231.60009/12/2019 518,955.00 1,4323133EKZK5 1.632 1,038Federal Farm Credit Bank1158 250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 268,132.50 1,7863133EJYL7 3.041 1,095Federal Farm Credit Bank1234 1,000,000.00 996,900.00 11/01/20231.60011/01/2019 1,040,290.00 1,4613133EK4X1 1.680 1,199Federal Home Loan Bank1177 500,000.00 498,550.00 02/13/20242.50003/01/2019 536,660.00 1,8103130AFW94 2.563 1,200Federal Farm Credit Bank1246 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/14/20241.43002/14/2020 1,037,850.00 1,4613133ELNE0 1.456 1,339Federal National Mtg Assn1206 500,000.00 495,950.00 07/02/20241.75007/15/2019 526,935.00 1,8143135G0V75 1.922 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:24 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 34 Days to Maturity Page 2 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 1,363Federal Farm Credit Bank1212 500,000.00 499,500.00 07/26/20241.85008/02/2019 528,545.00 1,8203133EKWV4 1.871 1,416Federal Farm Credit Bank1224 500,000.00 498,750.00 09/17/20241.60009/17/2019 524,555.00 1,8273133EKP75 1.652 1,416Federal Farm Credit Bank1242 1,000,000.00 998,600.00 09/17/20241.70012/17/2019 1,052,960.00 1,7363133ELEA8 1.731 1,632Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1275 1,000,000.00 998,500.00 04/21/20250.70004/28/2020 1,000,060.00 1,8193134GVLC0 0.731 1,668Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1279 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 05/27/20250.62505/27/2020 999,680.00 1,8263134GVYG7 0.625 1,681Federal Farm Credit Bank1280 500,000.00 499,850.00 06/09/20250.50006/09/2020 501,410.00 1,8263133ELH23 0.506 1,682Federal Farm Credit Bank1282 500,000.00 500,000.00 06/10/20250.68006/10/2020 501,995.00 1,8263133ELH80 0.680 1,685Federal Home Loan Bank1281 500,000.00 499,850.00 06/13/20250.50006/03/2020 502,130.00 1,8363130AJKW8 0.506 1,702Federal Home Loan Bank1283 300,000.00 300,000.00 06/30/20250.68006/30/2020 295,542.00 1,8263130AJRP6 0.680 1,747Federal National Mtg Assn1288 500,000.00 500,000.00 08/14/20250.50008/14/2020 496,970.00 1,8263135G05S8 0.500 1,751Federal National Mtg Assn1290 500,000.00 499,750.00 08/18/20250.52008/28/2020 497,300.00 1,8163136G4M75 0.530 1,754Federal National Mtg Assn1289 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 08/21/20250.56008/21/2020 993,490.00 1,8263136G4N74 0.560 15,014,892.36 1,60015,399,429.5015,050,000.0015,014,892.36Subtotal and Average 1,266 1.320 Treasury Coupon Securities 211U.S. Treasury1193 500,000.00 493,610.00 05/31/20211.37505/31/2019 503,635.00 731912828R77 2.030 241U.S. Treasury1045 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 5,033,200.00 1,808912828S27 1.125 364U.S. Treasury1070 2,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 2,021,800.00 1,679912828T67 1.903 560U.S. Treasury1192 500,000.00 496,650.00 05/15/20221.75005/31/2019 512,265.00 1,080912828SV3 1.984 698U.S. Treasury1178 500,000.00 489,687.50 09/30/20221.87503/01/2019 516,385.00 1,3099128282W9 2.480 1,063U.S. Treasury1217 500,000.00 499,300.00 09/30/20231.37508/21/2019 517,190.00 1,501912828T26 1.410 1,490U.S. Treasury1241 1,000,000.00 989,687.50 11/30/20241.50012/16/2019 1,048,790.00 1,811912828YV6 1.718 9,911,735.00 1,65310,153,265.0010,000,000.009,911,735.00Subtotal and Average 468 1.506 Certificate of Deposits 22First Bank Richmond1081 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/23/20201.80006/21/2017 245,274.22 1,251319267GC8 1.802 51Freedom Credit Union1111 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/22/20202.05012/22/2017 245,695.70 1,09635638BAA9 2.052 74Bankers Bank1086 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 240,835.81 1,28006610RAP4 1.804 78Farm Bureau Bank1165 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/18/20213.00012/17/2018 249,570.29 763307660LC2 2.898 80Eagle Bank1146 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 246,506.39 91527002YDV5 2.858 92Infinty FCU1211 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/01/20212.10007/31/2019 249,236.42 55145667EDY1 2.110 113Comenity Capital Bank1009 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 241,157.22 1,82720033APG5 1.702 127Ally Bank Midvale1176 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/08/20212.50003/07/2019 247,008.25 73202007GHX4 2.016 135Unity Bank1120 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 247,180.65 1,09691330ABN6 2.552 169Amex Centurion1077 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 242,300.11 1,46102587DP85 2.252 180Towne Bank1128 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 243,090.09 1,09689214PBL2 2.803 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:24 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 35 Days to Maturity Page 3 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 206PrivateBank & Trust1032 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016 241,730.82 1,82674267GVG9 1.501 218Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/07/20212.25006/07/2017 242,909.65 1,46114042RGD7 2.252 255Central State Bank1085 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20211.85007/14/2017 242,692.08 1,46115523RBJ4 1.851 288General Electric Credit Union1150 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/16/20213.10008/15/2018 245,425.64 1,097369674AV8 3.100 330New York Community Bank1226 245,000.00 245,000.00 09/27/20211.80009/27/2019 248,374.78 731649447TC3 1.802 359Northpointe Bank1127 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/26/20212.70004/26/2018 245,725.20 1,279666613GV0 2.703 381First Source Bank1168 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/17/20213.15012/17/2018 252,331.07 1,06633646CKP8 3.153 386Belmont Savings Bank1102 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 249,664.82 1,462080515CD9 2.101 386TNB Bank1187 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/22/20212.40005/22/2019 253,522.27 91587266AAA1 2.407 415Neighbors FCU1167 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20213.20012/21/2018 253,142.04 1,09664017AAQ7 3.203 416United Credit Union1214 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/22/20212.00008/22/2019 252,819.30 853910160AH3 2.003 444The Ohio Valley Bank1089 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017 244,702.91 1,645677721CN0 1.903 456Third Federal Savings and Loan1112 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/31/20222.50001/30/2018 251,838.34 1,46288413QBY3 2.502 457Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/01/20222.25002/01/2017 245,928.73 1,8262546722U1 2.251 480BMW Bank1067 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/24/20222.20002/24/2017 246,065.08 1,82605580AGK4 2.201 484Maine Savings FCU1171 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20223.30012/28/2018 257,998.53 1,158560507AK1 3.306 502Luana Savings Bank1225 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/18/20221.60009/18/2019 249,445.97 912549104JN8 1.599 514Bellco Credit Union1264 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/30/20221.30003/31/2020 251,575.18 72907833EAD9 1.300 515Cadence Bank, NA1259 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/31/20221.20003/31/2020 248,213.87 73012738RFX7 1.200 515Bank of Santa Clarita1261 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20221.10003/31/2020 250,899.96 73006424KBC3 1.100 541Goldman Sachs1078 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/26/20222.40004/26/2017 247,608.52 1,82638148PJK4 2.401 544Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/29/20222.80004/30/2018 249,107.81 1,46030960QAG2 2.802 562Kansas State Bank1101 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/17/20222.10011/17/2017 251,954.08 1,64250116CBE8 2.099 578Synchrony Bank Retail1080 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/02/20222.40006/02/2017 248,184.57 1,82687164XQV1 2.401 584PCSB Bank1149 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/08/20223.00006/08/2018 255,833.75 1,46169324MAD7 3.002 585Synovus Bank1253 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/09/20221.60003/09/2020 250,269.31 82287164DRD4 1.602 589Allegiance Bank1143 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/13/20223.10006/13/2018 256,320.10 1,46101748DBE5 3.102 597Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/21/20222.35006/21/2017 248,252.89 1,826795450A70 2.351 604America's Credit Union1200 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/28/20222.30006/28/2019 256,424.70 1,09603065AAL7 2.302 645Traditions Bank1148 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/08/20223.00006/08/2018 257,030.77 1,52289269CBX9 3.002 660CIT Bank NA1219 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/23/20221.90008/23/2019 252,361.18 1,09612556LBA3 1.902 666American Express Fed Savings B1096 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/29/20222.40008/29/2017 249,495.90 1,82602587CFU9 2.402 666Sterling Bank1201 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/29/20222.15006/28/2019 253,560.75 1,15885916VDC6 2.153 711Alliance Credit Union1095 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/13/20222.25010/13/2017 254,694.29 1,82601859BAA3 2.251 723Barclays Bank1097 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/25/20222.30010/25/2017 249,896.91 1,82606740KLJ4 2.291 726Merrick Bank1163 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/28/20223.25010/30/2018 263,026.42 1,45959013J4K2 3.252 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:24 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 36 Days to Maturity Page 4 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 737Mountain America Federal CU1099 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/08/20222.30011/08/2017 255,338.96 1,82662384RAC0 2.301 747CrossFirst Bank1106 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20222.20011/20/2017 254,970.10 1,82422766ACB9 2.201 757Enterprise Bank, NA1107 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/28/20222.15011/28/2017 254,845.29 1,82629367QCP1 2.151 766Medallion Bank1169 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.40012/07/2018 264,663.15 1,46158404DCX7 3.402 766Red Rocks Credit Union1166 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.35012/07/2018 264,399.33 1,46175701LAB3 3.352 788Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/29/20222.40012/29/2017 256,570.31 1,826499724AB8 2.401 789Kern FCU1239 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.90012/30/2019 256,987.58 1,09649228XAK6 1.902 789San Francisco FCU1240 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.85012/30/2019 256,715.89 1,09679772FAC0 1.852 820Wells Fargo Natl Bank West1244 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/30/20231.90001/29/2020 257,321.56 1,097949495AT2 1.900 842Servisfirst Bank1254 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20231.60002/21/2020 255,831.30 1,09681768PAF3 1.601 849Verus Bank of Commerce1180 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20232.70002/28/2019 262,325.14 1,46192535LCD4 2.700 871Aneca Federal Credit Union1119 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018 260,076.02 1,826034577AH9 2.802 880Northstar Bank1263 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 253,389.86 1,09566704MEQ0 1.150 880West Michigan Cmnty Bk1265 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 253,389.86 1,095954444BS3 1.150 891Citibank NA1123 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/11/20232.90004/11/2018 261,000.75 1,82617312QJ26 2.902 908Congressional Bank1189 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20232.50004/30/2019 262,014.02 1,45920726ABA5 2.502 908EnerBank USA1125 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/28/20232.95004/30/2018 256,282.81 1,82429278TAY6 2.952 915First National Bank1179 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/05/20232.80003/05/2019 263,990.69 1,52232117BCX4 2.802 925University of Iowa Comm. CU1134 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/15/20233.05005/14/2018 257,182.71 1,82791435LAG2 3.052 948Pittsfield Cooperative Bank1194 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/07/20232.50006/07/2019 259,396.15 1,461725404AB3 2.502 961Morton Community1173 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/20/20232.75003/20/2019 264,432.18 1,553619165JD6 2.753 961RCB Bank1144 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/20/20233.15006/20/2018 263,845.38 1,82674934YAH4 3.152 967American First CU1285 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/26/20230.35006/26/2020 248,571.98 1,09502616AAH2 0.350 990American National Bank1205 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/19/20232.00007/19/2019 259,791.16 1,46102772JBD1 2.001 991First National Bank of America1147 245,000.00 245,000.00 07/20/20233.15007/20/2018 264,402.30 1,82632110YLK9 3.152 1,002Bank of New England1151 249,000.00 249,000.00 07/31/20233.25007/31/2018 269,577.99 1,82606426KAN8 3.252 1,025Raymond James Bank1218 244,000.00 244,000.00 08/23/20231.95008/23/2019 255,633.68 1,46175472RAD3 1.951 1,062Triad Bank1262 248,000.00 248,000.00 09/29/20231.35003/30/2020 255,846.67 1,27889579NCD3 1.352 1,080Marlin Business Bank1155 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/17/20233.30010/17/2018 270,428.83 1,82657116ARV2 3.302 1,080Municipal Trust and Savings1160 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.20010/17/2018 266,424.30 1,826625925AR3 3.202 1,080UBS Bank USA1161 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.35010/17/2018 267,524.11 1,82690348JEJ5 3.352 1,082Jefferson Financial CU1154 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20233.35010/19/2018 267,552.24 1,826474067AQ8 3.352 1,109Commercial Bank1162 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/15/20233.40011/15/2018 271,757.40 1,82620143PDV9 3.402 1,122Numerica Credit Union1164 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/28/20233.55011/28/2018 273,190.42 1,82667054NAN3 3.552 1,145National Cooperative Bank, N.A1170 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20233.40012/21/2018 269,162.83 1,826635573AL2 3.402 1,153Bar Harbor Bank and Trust1172 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/29/20233.35012/31/2018 272,248.16 1,824066851WJ1 3.352 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:24 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 37 Days to Maturity Page 5 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,184Lakeside Bank1208 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/29/20242.00007/30/2019 261,869.40 1,64451210SQU4 2.003 1,198Rollstone B&T1251 245,000.00 245,000.00 02/12/20241.65002/12/2020 255,961.30 1,46177579ADF0 1.651 1,199Northwest Bank1181 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/13/20242.95002/13/2019 269,812.79 1,82666736ABP3 2.951 1,213Wells Fargo1174 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/27/20243.00002/27/2019 270,482.13 1,826949763XY7 3.001 1,243Texas Bank Financial1260 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/28/20241.10003/31/2020 251,686.67 1,458882213AB7 1.101 1,261The Jefferson Bank1272 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/15/20241.25004/15/2020 256,124.44 1,461472382AQ3 1.251 1,262Belmont Bank and Trust1270 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/16/20241.25004/16/2020 256,130.84 1,46108016PDQ9 1.251 1,262Pacific Western Bank1269 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/16/20241.30004/16/2020 253,454.58 1,46169506YRH4 1.301 1,272Main Street Bank1188 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/26/20242.60004/26/2019 267,976.51 1,82756065GAG3 2.603 1,291First Service Bank1231 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/15/20241.70011/15/2019 260,247.33 1,64333640VDD7 1.701 1,292JP Morgan Chase1185 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/16/20243.25005/16/2019 270,672.15 1,82748128HXU7 3.254 1,299Iowa State Bank1186 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/23/20242.40005/23/2019 263,322.75 1,82746256YAZ2 2.403 1,304Live Oak Bank1238 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/28/20241.80011/27/2019 261,264.19 1,644538036GV0 1.802 1,305Century Next Bank1184 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/29/20242.50005/29/2019 267,539.97 1,827156634AK3 2.503 1,314Plains Commerce Bank1195 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/07/20242.55006/07/2019 264,811.35 1,82772651LCL6 2.553 1,319Evansville Teachers Credit FCU1196 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/12/20242.60006/12/2019 268,596.08 1,827299547AQ2 2.603 1,326Legacy Bank1197 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/19/20242.40006/19/2019 266,885.98 1,827524661CB9 2.403 1,328Citizens State Bank1199 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/21/20242.40006/21/2019 266,914.26 1,827176688CP2 2.403 1,335Communitywide FCU1202 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/28/20242.25006/28/2019 265,640.10 1,82720416TAQ5 2.253 1,335Revere Bank1203 247,000.00 247,000.00 06/28/20242.30006/28/2019 265,012.02 1,827761402BY1 2.303 1,363Abacus Federal Savings1207 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/26/20241.95007/26/2019 263,146.02 1,82700257TBD7 1.952 1,367First Security Bank of WA1209 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/30/20242.00007/30/2019 263,600.64 1,82733625CCP2 2.002 1,368People's Bank1210 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/31/20242.00007/31/2019 263,553.89 1,827710571DS6 2.002 1,384Preferred Bank1213 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/16/20242.00008/16/2019 264,856.78 1,827740367HP5 2.002 1,391FirsTier Bank1216 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/23/20241.95008/23/2019 264,457.79 1,82733766LAJ7 1.952 1,391Washington Federal1215 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/23/20242.00008/23/2019 263,872.35 1,827938828BH2 2.002 1,398First State Bk DeQueen1222 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/30/20241.80008/30/2019 261,976.35 1,827336460CX6 1.802 1,398First Natl Bk of Syracuse1221 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/30/20241.85008/30/2019 263,513.61 1,827334342CD2 1.852 1,398Celtic Bank1220 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/30/20241.85008/30/2019 262,455.32 1,82715118RRH2 1.852 1,426BankWest Inc1227 248,000.00 248,000.00 09/27/20241.70009/27/2019 261,277.02 1,82706652CHB0 1.702 1,454Southern Bancorp Bk1286 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/25/20240.50006/26/2020 249,523.68 1,58284223QAN7 0.500 1,467Sauk Valley B&T Co1235 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/07/20241.70011/07/2019 261,531.62 1,827804375DL4 1.702 1,480Morgan Stanley Bank1237 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/20/20241.95011/20/2019 260,976.14 1,82761690UNX4 1.952 1,480Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1236 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/20/20241.90011/20/2019 260,475.95 1,82761760A3B3 1.902 1,520Bank Princeton1287 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20240.50006/30/2020 249,373.08 1,644064520BG3 0.500 1,559United Community1249 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/07/20251.65002/07/2020 261,597.76 1,82790983WBT7 1.652 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:24 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 38 Days to Maturity Page 6 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,566First National Bank Michigan1250 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/14/20251.65002/14/2020 261,658.24 1,82732114VBT3 1.652 1,566Freedom Financial1248 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/14/20251.55002/14/2020 260,587.00 1,82735637RDC8 1.552 1,573American State1255 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20251.60002/21/2020 261,180.72 1,827029728BC5 1.602 1,579Citadel FCU1252 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/27/20251.65002/27/2020 261,770.55 1,82717286TAG0 1.652 1,593Access Bank1256 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/13/20251.60003/13/2020 261,257.16 1,82600435JBH5 1.601 1,600Spring Bank1257 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/20/20251.50003/20/2020 260,220.78 1,826849430BF9 1.501 1,606Axos Bank1258 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/26/20251.65003/26/2020 261,913.37 1,82605465DAE8 1.651 1,608Alma Bank1267 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/28/20251.40003/30/2020 259,181.81 1,824020080BX4 1.399 1,611Commonwealth Business Bk1268 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.25003/31/2020 257,381.76 1,8262027506M2 1.251 1,611Nicolet Natl Bank1266 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.40003/31/2020 259,033.47 1,826654062JZ2 1.401 1,619Capital One USA FDIC339541271 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/08/20251.60004/08/2020 258,207.49 1,82614042TDD6 1.601 1,639Firrst Natl Bk McGregor1274 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20251.35004/28/2020 258,743.37 1,82632112UDR9 1.351 1,640First Freedom Bank1273 249,000.00 249,000.00 04/29/20251.20004/29/2020 258,105.01 1,82632027BAL1 1.201 1,641Flagstar1276248,000.00 248,000.00 04/30/20251.25004/30/2020 257,546.71 1,82633847E3A3 1.251 1,6531st Internet Bank1278 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/12/20251.00005/11/2020 254,799.91 1,82732056GDJ6 0.985 1,654Western State Bank1277 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/13/20251.00005/13/2020 251,715.97 1,82695960NKD8 1.001 1,696Chippewa Valley Bk1284 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/24/20250.60006/24/2020 250,247.30 1,826169894AS1 0.600 33,439,000.00 1,55434,958,107.9133,439,000.0033,581,258.06Subtotal and Average 948 2.160 Corporate Notes 276Apple Inc1079 500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 504,265.00 1,514037833CC2 1.900 462Proctor and Gamble1159 500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 512,580.00 1,210742718DY2 3.071 774Wal-Mart Stores, Inc1190 500,000.00 496,650.00 12/15/20222.35004/16/2019 520,665.00 1,339931142DU4 2.799 822Colgate-Palmolive1175 500,000.00 485,250.00 02/01/20231.95003/04/2019 517,925.00 1,43019416QEA4 2.751 1,010Microsoft Corporation1157 400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 417,624.00 1,758594918BQ6 3.222 2,341,260.00 1,4362,473,059.002,400,000.002,341,260.00Subtotal and Average 652 2.725 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 1US Bank1058 29.27 29.2707/01/2016 29.27 1SYS1058 0.000 29.27 129.2729.2729.27Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1CalPERS CERBT Plan1114 1,785,913.46 1,785,913.4607/01/2020 1,785,913.46 1SYS1114 0.000 1,785,913.46 11,785,913.461,785,913.461,785,913.46Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:24 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 39 Days to Maturity Page 7 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date PARS Pension Trust 1Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Serv1230 10,416,785.70 10,416,785.7007/01/2020 10,416,785.70 1SYS1230 0.000 10,416,785.70 110,416,785.7010,416,785.7010,500,770.43Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 627156,165,424.37 152,947,957.86 373 1.045155,461,450.48 152,765,845.22Total and Average Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:24 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 40 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund October 1, 2020 - October 31, 2020 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 500,000.001288500,000.00 0.500FNMA 208.33 0.00 208.330.491101500,000.003135G05S8 0.00 495,950.001206500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.17 0.00 729.171.731101495,950.003135G0V75 0.00 992,100.0012331,000,000.00 1.375FNMA 1,145.83 0.00 1,145.831.360101992,100.003135G0W33 0.00 1,000,000.0012891,000,000.00 0.560FNMA 466.67 0.00 466.670.5491011,000,000.003136G4N74 0.00 499,750.001290500,000.00 0.520FNMA 216.66 0.00 216.660.510101499,750.003136G4M75 0.00 1,000,000.0012791,000,000.00 0.625FHLMC 520.83 0.00 520.830.6131011,000,000.003134GVYG7 0.00 998,500.0012751,000,000.00 0.700FHLMC 583.33 0.00 583.330.688101998,500.003134GVLC0 0.00 999,217.3612471,000,000.00 1.400FFCB 1,166.66 0.00 1,166.661.375101999,217.363133EGWJ0 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 583.33 0.00 583.332.778101247,275.003133EJYL7 0.00 996,900.0012341,000,000.00 1.600FFCB 1,333.33 0.00 1,333.331.575101996,900.003133EK4X1 0.00 499,500.001198500,000.00 1.875FFCB 781.25 0.00 781.251.842101499,500.003133EKQP4 0.00 998,600.0012421,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.670101998,600.003133ELEA8 0.00 499,500.001212500,000.00 1.850FFCB 770.83 0.00 770.831.817101499,500.003133EKWV4 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.66 0.00 1,416.661.681101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 999,000.0012461,000,000.00 1.430FFCB 1,191.67 0.00 1,191.671.404101999,000.003133ELNE0 0.00 500,000.001282500,000.00 0.680FFCB 283.34 0.00 283.340.667101500,000.003133ELH80 0.00 499,400.001223500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.67 0.00 666.671.572101499,400.003133EKZK5 0.00 498,750.001224500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.67 0.00 666.671.574101498,750.003133EKP75 0.00 499,850.001280500,000.00 0.500FFCB 208.33 0.00 208.330.491101499,850.003133ELH23 0.00 499,850.001281500,000.00 0.500FHLB 208.33 0.00 208.330.491101499,850.003130AJKW8 0.00 300,000.001283300,000.00 0.680FHLB 170.00 0.00 170.000.667101300,000.003130AJRP6 0.00 498,550.001177500,000.00 2.500FHLB 1,041.66 0.00 1,041.662.460101498,550.003130AFW94 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,107.10 0.00 2,107.101.2771011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 496,650.001192500,000.00 1.750USTR 737.09 0.00 737.091.747101496,650.00912828SV3 0.00 499,300.001217500,000.00 1.375USTR 585.51 0.00 585.511.381101499,300.00912828T26 0.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,738.45 0.00 4,738.451.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 989,687.5012411,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,270.50 0.00 1,270.501.511101989,687.50912828YV6 0.00 493,610.001193500,000.00 1.375USTR 582.31 0.00 582.311.389101493,610.00912828R77 0.00 489,687.501178500,000.00 1.875USTR 798.42 0.00 798.421.920101489,687.509128282W9 0.00 248,000.001174248,000.00 3.000WELLS 631.89 0.00 631.893.000101248,000.00949763XY7 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:07 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.141 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest October 1, 2020 - October 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 453,624.171057453,624.17WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.01101350,474.574159282482 0.00 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 248,000.001169248,000.00 3.400MEDBA 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0058404DCX7 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 684.55 0.00 684.553.250101248,000.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 248,000.001173248,000.00 2.750MORTN 579.23 0.00 579.232.750101248,000.00619165JD6 0.00 245,000.001271245,000.00 1.600CAPONE 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.0014042TDD6 0.00 245,000.001176245,000.00 2.500ALLY 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0002007GHX4 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 305.76 0.00 305.761.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 57,275,840.36105557,275,840.36 0.620LAIF 30,069.59 0.00 30,069.590.65410154,144,117.9998-33-434 0.00 0.0012930.00BNY 0.01 0.00 0.01101-35,016.83SYS1293 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.84 0.00 645.841.542101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 245,000.001081245,000.00 1.800RICHMN 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.00319267GC8 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 479.02 0.00 479.022.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 468.18 0.00 468.182.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 478.59 0.00 478.592.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 436.97 0.00 436.972.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 436.98 0.00 436.982.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 457.78 0.00 457.782.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001236245,000.00 1.900MSPRIV 395.35 0.00 395.351.900101245,000.0061760A3B3 0.00 245,000.001237245,000.00 1.950MORGST 405.76 0.00 405.761.950101245,000.0061690UNX4 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 499.40 0.00 499.402.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 245,000.001111245,000.00 2.050FREECU 426.57 0.00 426.572.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:07 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.142 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest October 1, 2020 - October 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 1,785,913.4611141,785,913.46CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001011,785,913.46SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 666.66 0.00 666.662.075101378,360.00594918BQ6 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 582.63 0.00 582.632.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 603.44 0.00 603.442.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 0.0011240.00 2.7001STTCH 344.34 0.00 344.342.700101245,000.0033715LBJ8 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 601.32 0.00 601.322.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 550.36 0.00 550.362.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 621.70 0.00 621.703.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001226245,000.00 1.800NYCMBK 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.00649447TC3 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 645.06 0.00 645.063.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 593.03 0.00 593.032.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 631.89 0.00 631.893.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 687.31 0.00 687.313.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 2,853,430.2211532,853,430.22 0.190CAMP 457.15 0.00 457.150.1891012,852,973.07SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 697.07 0.00 697.073.350101245,000.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 695.08 0.00 695.083.300101248,000.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 958.34 0.00 958.342.312101487,950.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 665.86 0.00 665.863.200101245,000.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 697.08 0.00 697.083.350101245,000.0090348JEJ5 0.00 248,000.001162248,000.00 3.400COMMBK 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0020143PDV9 0.00 248,000.001164248,000.00 3.550NMRCA 747.74 0.00 747.743.550101248,000.0067054NAN3 0.00 248,000.001165248,000.00 3.000FARMBU 631.89 0.00 631.893.000101248,000.00307660LC2 0.00 248,000.001166248,000.00 3.350REDRCK 705.61 0.00 705.613.350101248,000.0075701LAB3 0.00 245,000.001167245,000.00 3.200NEIGH 665.87 0.00 665.873.200101245,000.0064017AAQ7 0.00 245,000.001168245,000.00 3.1501STSRC 655.45 0.00 655.453.150101245,000.0033646CKP8 0.00 245,000.001170245,000.00 3.400NLCOOP 707.47 0.00 707.473.400101245,000.00635573AL2 0.00 248,000.001171248,000.00 3.300MAINE 695.09 0.00 695.093.300101248,000.00560507AK1 0.00 248,000.001172248,000.00 3.350BARHAR 705.61 0.00 705.613.350101248,000.00066851WJ1 0.00 485,250.001175500,000.00 1.950COLGTE 812.50 0.00 812.501.971101485,250.0019416QEA4 0.00 0.0011830.00STIFEL 0.01 0.00 0.013.2261013.65SYS1183 0.00 248,000.001179248,000.00 2.8001STNBK 589.76 0.00 589.762.800101248,000.0032117BCX4 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:07 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.143 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest October 1, 2020 - October 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001180248,000.00 2.700VERUS 568.71 0.00 568.712.700101248,000.0092535LCD4 0.00 248,000.001181248,000.00 2.950NRTHWS 621.36 0.00 621.362.950101248,000.0066736ABP3 0.00 248,000.001184248,000.00 2.500CENTNX 526.57 0.00 526.572.500101248,000.00156634AK3 0.00 245,000.001185245,000.00 3.250JPMORG 676.27 0.00 676.273.250101245,000.0048128HXU7 0.00 245,000.001186245,000.00 2.400IOWAST 499.40 0.00 499.402.400101245,000.0046256YAZ2 0.00 248,000.001187248,000.00 2.400TSCOLA 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.0087266AAA1 0.00 248,000.001188248,000.00 2.600MAINST 547.64 0.00 547.642.600101248,000.0056065GAG3 0.00 248,000.001189248,000.00 2.500CONGRS 526.58 0.00 526.582.500101248,000.0020726ABA5 0.00 496,650.001190500,000.00 2.350WALMRT 979.17 0.00 979.172.321101496,650.00931142DU4 0.00 245,000.001194245,000.00 2.500PITTS 520.20 0.00 520.202.500101245,000.00725404AB3 0.00 245,000.001195245,000.00 2.550PLAINS 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0072651LCL6 0.00 248,000.001196248,000.00 2.600EVNSCU 547.64 0.00 547.642.600101248,000.00299547AQ2 0.00 248,000.001197248,000.00 2.400LEGCY 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.00524661CB9 0.00 248,000.001199248,000.00 2.400CTZNST 505.52 0.00 505.522.400101248,000.00176688CP2 0.00 248,000.001200248,000.00 2.300AMERCU 484.45 0.00 484.452.300101248,000.0003065AAL7 0.00 245,000.001201245,000.00 2.150STRLNG 447.37 0.00 447.372.150101245,000.0085916VDC6 0.00 248,000.001202248,000.00 2.250COMMW 473.92 0.00 473.922.250101248,000.0020416TAQ5 0.00 247,000.001203247,000.00 2.300REVER 482.49 0.00 482.492.300101247,000.00761402BY1 0.00 248,000.001205248,000.00 2.000AMRNTL 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0002772JBD1 0.00 248,000.001207248,000.00 1.950ABACUS 410.73 0.00 410.731.950101248,000.0000257TBD7 0.00 248,000.001208248,000.00 2.000LKSIDE 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0051210SQU4 0.00 248,000.001209248,000.00 2.0001STSEC 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0033625CCP2 0.00 248,000.001210248,000.00 2.000PEOPLE 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00710571DS6 0.00 248,000.001211248,000.00 2.100NFNITY 442.32 0.00 442.322.100101248,000.0045667EDY1 0.00 249,000.001213249,000.00 2.000PREFRD 422.96 0.00 422.962.000101249,000.00740367HP5 0.00 248,000.001214248,000.00 2.000UNTDCU 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00910160AH3 0.00 248,000.001215248,000.00 2.000WSHFED 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00938828BH2 0.00 249,000.001216249,000.00 1.9501STIER 412.38 0.00 412.381.950101249,000.0033766LAJ7 0.00 244,000.001218244,000.00 1.950RAYJAM 404.10 0.00 404.101.950101244,000.0075472RAD3 0.00 245,000.001219245,000.00 1.900CITBNK 395.36 0.00 395.361.900101245,000.0012556LBA3 0.00 248,000.001220248,000.00 1.850CELTIC 389.67 0.00 389.671.850101248,000.0015118RRH2 0.00 249,000.001221249,000.00 1.8501STNBS 391.24 0.00 391.241.850101249,000.00334342CD2 0.00 248,000.001222248,000.00 1.8001STDQN 379.13 0.00 379.131.800101248,000.00336460CX6 0.00 245,000.001225245,000.00 1.600LUANA 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.00549104JN8 0.00 2,212,787.3612282,212,787.36BOTW 0.01 0.00 0.011016,686,529.78059731851 0.00 248,000.001227248,000.00 1.700BNKWST 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0006652CHB0 0.00 10,416,785.70123010,416,785.70PARS 0.00 0.00 0.0010110,503,569.92SYS1230 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:07 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.144 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 5 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest October 1, 2020 - October 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001231248,000.00 1.7001STSER 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0033640VDD7 0.00 248,000.001235248,000.00 1.700SAUKVL 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.00804375DL4 0.00 248,000.001238248,000.00 1.800LIVEOK 379.13 0.00 379.131.800101248,000.00538036GV0 0.00 248,000.001239248,000.00 1.900KERNCU 400.20 0.00 400.201.900101248,000.0049228XAK6 0.00 248,000.001240248,000.00 1.850SF FCU 389.67 0.00 389.671.850101248,000.0079772FAC0 0.00 248,000.001244248,000.00 1.900WFNBW 400.20 0.00 400.201.900101248,000.00949495AT2 0.00 248,000.001248248,000.00 1.550FRDMFI 326.48 0.00 326.481.550101248,000.0035637RDC8 0.00 248,000.001249248,000.00 1.650UNTDCM 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0090983WBT7 0.00 248,000.001250248,000.00 1.6501STNMI 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0032114VBT3 0.00 245,000.001251245,000.00 1.650RLLSTN 343.33 0.00 343.331.650101245,000.0077579ADF0 0.00 248,000.001252248,000.00 1.650CITADL 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0017286TAG0 0.00 245,000.001253245,000.00 1.600SYNOVS 332.94 0.00 332.941.600101245,000.0087164DRD4 0.00 248,000.001254248,000.00 1.600SERVIS 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.0081768PAF3 0.00 248,000.001255248,000.00 1.600AMERST 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.00029728BC5 0.00 248,000.001256248,000.00 1.600ACCSS 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.0000435JBH5 0.00 248,000.001257248,000.00 1.500SPRING 315.94 0.00 315.941.500101248,000.00849430BF9 0.00 248,000.001258248,000.00 1.650AXOS 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0005465DAE8 0.00 245,000.001259245,000.00 1.200CADNCE 249.70 0.00 249.701.200101245,000.0012738RFX7 0.00 245,000.001260245,000.00 1.100TEXAS 228.89 0.00 228.891.100101245,000.00882213AB7 0.00 248,000.001261248,000.00 1.100SNTCLR 231.69 0.00 231.691.100101248,000.0006424KBC3 0.00 248,000.001262248,000.00 1.350TRIAD 284.35 0.00 284.351.350101248,000.0089579NCD3 0.00 248,000.001263248,000.00 1.150NRTHSR 242.22 0.00 242.221.150101248,000.0066704MEQ0 0.00 248,000.001264248,000.00 1.300BELLCO 273.82 0.00 273.821.300101248,000.0007833EAD9 0.00 248,000.001265248,000.00 1.150WESTMI 242.22 0.00 242.221.150101248,000.00954444BS3 0.00 248,000.001266248,000.00 1.400NCOLET 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.00654062JZ2 0.00 248,000.001267248,000.00 1.400ALMABK 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.00020080BX4 0.00 248,000.001268248,000.00 1.250CMWBUS 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.002027506M2 0.00 245,000.001269245,000.00 1.300PACWST 270.51 0.00 270.511.300101245,000.0069506YRH4 0.00 248,000.001270248,000.00 1.250BELB&T 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.0008016PDQ9 0.00 248,000.001272248,000.00 1.250THEJEF 263.28 0.00 263.281.250101248,000.00472382AQ3 0.00 249,000.001273249,000.00 1.2001STFDM 253.77 0.00 253.771.200101249,000.0032027BAL1 0.00 248,000.001274248,000.00 1.3501STMCG 284.35 0.00 284.351.350101248,000.0032112UDR9 0.00 248,000.001276248,000.00 1.250FLGSTR 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.0033847E3A3 0.00 245,000.001277245,000.00 1.000WSTRNS 208.08 0.00 208.081.000101245,000.0095960NKD8 0.00 248,000.001278248,000.00 1.0001STINT 210.63 0.00 210.631.000101248,000.0032056GDJ6 0.00 248,000.001284248,000.00 0.600CHIPVA 126.38 0.00 126.380.600101248,000.00169894AS1 0.00 248,000.001285248,000.00 0.350AMR1ST 73.72 0.00 73.720.350101248,000.0002616AAH2 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:07 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.145 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 6 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest October 1, 2020 - October 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001286248,000.00 0.500STHRNB 105.32 0.00 105.320.500101248,000.0084223QAN7 0.00 248,000.001287248,000.00 0.500BKPRNC 105.32 0.00 105.320.500101248,000.00064520BG3 0.00 246,571.361294246,571.36DREYF 0.00 0.00 0.0010124,581.74X9USDDTP3 0.00 136,137,252.63Subtotal 135,955,139.99 1.055 122,939.070.00122,939.07137,268,334.71 0.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 29.27105829.27USBANK 0.01 0.00 0.010.40223129.27SYS1058 0.00 29.27Subtotal 29.27 0.402 0.010.000.0129.27 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 265,528.671062265,528.67LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241253,410.60SYS1062 0.00 265,528.67Subtotal 265,528.67 0.000.000.00253,410.60 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 16,545,147.29111316,545,147.29 0.620LAIF 8,809.17 0.00 8,809.170.62824916,510,033.5025-33-005 0.00 16,545,147.29Subtotal 16,545,147.29 0.628 8,809.170.008,809.1716,510,033.50 0.00 152,947,957.86Total 152,765,845.22 1.008 131,748.250.00131,748.25154,031,808.08 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:07 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.146 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management November 30, 2020 City of La Quinta - Portfolio Summary % of Portfolio Book ValueInvestmentsMarket Value Par Value Days to MaturityTerm YTM 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 3,671,876.28 12.39 0.00013,671,876.283,671,876.28 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 56,275,840.36 136.61 0.576156,612,187.5656,275,840.36 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 16,545,147.29 110.76 0.576116,627,431.3016,545,147.29 Money Market/Mutual Funds 246,860.66 10.16 0.0001246,860.66246,860.66 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 2,853,747.82 11.86 0.14012,853,747.822,853,747.82 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 16,013,392.36 1,60310.42 1.2701,26016,398,671.5016,050,000.00 Treasury Coupon Securities 9,911,735.00 1,6536.45 1.50643810,147,045.0010,000,000.00 Certificate of Deposits 33,194,000.00 1,55721.60 2.16292534,674,175.7733,194,000.00 Corporate Notes 2,341,260.00 1,4361.52 2.7256222,473,679.002,400,000.00 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 29.27 10.00 0.000129.2729.27 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1,785,913.46 11.16 0.00011,785,913.461,785,913.46 PARS Pension Trust 10,861,312.47 17.07 0.000110,861,312.4710,861,312.47 153,701,114.97 100.00%Investments 156,352,930.09153,884,727.61 632 369 1.013 Current Year November 30 128,022.55 Fiscal Year To Date 725,552.63 Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 152,689,229.21 160,155,502.96 1.08%1.02% Total Earnings Month Ending I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. __________________________________________________ ____________________ Karla Romero, Finance Director Portfolio CITY CP Reporting period 11/01/2020-11/30/2020 Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:20 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.147 Days to Maturity Page 1 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Bank Accounts 1Bank of New York1293 0.00 0.0009/01/2020 0.00 1SYS1293 0.000 1Bank of the West1228 2,628,359.40 2,628,359.4008/20/2019 2,628,359.40 1059731851 0.000 1City Petty Cash1059 3,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS1059 0.000 1La Quinta Palms Realty1062 277,123.88 277,123.8807/01/2016 277,123.88 1SYS1062 0.000 1Stifel, Nicolaus & Company1183 0.00 0.0003/18/2019 0.00 1SYS1183 0.000 1Wells Fargo1057 763,093.00 763,093.0007/01/2016 763,093.00 14159282482 0.000 3,671,876.28 13,671,876.283,671,876.282,959,794.74Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 1Local Agency Inv Fund1055 56,275,840.36 56,275,840.36 0.57656,612,187.56 198-33-434 0.576 56,275,840.36 156,612,187.5656,275,840.3656,775,840.36Subtotal and Average 1 0.576 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 1Local Agency Inv Fund1113 16,545,147.29 16,545,147.29 0.57616,627,431.30 125-33-005 0.576 16,545,147.29 116,627,431.3016,545,147.2916,545,147.29Subtotal and Average 1 0.576 Money Market/Mutual Funds 1Dreyfus1294246,860.66 246,860.6609/24/2020 246,860.66 1X9USDDTP3 0.000 246,860.66 1246,860.66246,860.66246,581.00Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 1California Asset Management Pr1153 2,853,747.82 2,853,747.82 0.14009/26/2018 2,853,747.82 1SYS1153 0.140 2,853,747.82 12,853,747.822,853,747.822,853,440.81Subtotal and Average 1 0.140 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 274Federal Farm Credit Bank1105 1,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 1,012,030.00 1,3923133EHWM1 1.913 644Federal National Mtg Assn1233 1,000,000.00 992,100.00 09/06/20221.37510/29/2019 1,021,460.00 1,0433135G0W33 1.659 667Federal Farm Credit Bank1247 1,000,000.00 999,217.36 09/29/20221.40002/05/2020 1,022,390.00 9673133EGWJ0 1.430 741Federal Farm Credit Bank1198 500,000.00 499,500.00 12/12/20221.87506/20/2019 517,125.00 1,2713133EKQP4 1.905 986Federal Farm Credit Bank1223 500,000.00 499,400.00 08/14/20231.60009/12/2019 518,690.00 1,4323133EKZK5 1.632 1,008Federal Farm Credit Bank1158 250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 267,762.50 1,7863133EJYL7 3.041 1,065Federal Farm Credit Bank1234 1,000,000.00 996,900.00 11/01/20231.60011/01/2019 1,036,280.00 1,4613133EK4X1 1.680 1,169Federal Home Loan Bank1177 500,000.00 498,550.00 02/13/20242.50003/01/2019 536,085.00 1,8103130AFW94 2.563 1,170Federal Farm Credit Bank1246 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/14/20241.43002/14/2020 1,037,770.00 1,4613133ELNE0 1.456 1,309Federal National Mtg Assn1206 500,000.00 495,950.00 07/02/20241.75007/15/2019 526,210.00 1,8143135G0V75 1.922 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 48 Days to Maturity Page 2 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 1,333Federal Farm Credit Bank1212 500,000.00 499,500.00 07/26/20241.85008/02/2019 528,705.00 1,8203133EKWV4 1.871 1,386Federal Farm Credit Bank1224 500,000.00 498,750.00 09/17/20241.60009/17/2019 524,520.00 1,8273133EKP75 1.652 1,386Federal Farm Credit Bank1242 1,000,000.00 998,600.00 09/17/20241.70012/17/2019 1,052,810.00 1,7363133ELEA8 1.731 1,448Federal National Mtg Assn1291 500,000.00 499,250.00 11/18/20240.42011/18/2020 499,825.00 1,4613135G06E8 0.458 1,602Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1275 1,000,000.00 998,500.00 04/21/20250.70004/28/2020 1,000,140.00 1,8193134GVLC0 0.731 1,638Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1279 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 05/27/20250.62505/27/2020 1,000,290.00 1,8263134GVYG7 0.625 1,651Federal Farm Credit Bank1280 500,000.00 499,850.00 06/09/20250.50006/09/2020 501,915.00 1,8263133ELH23 0.506 1,652Federal Farm Credit Bank1282 500,000.00 500,000.00 06/10/20250.68006/10/2020 502,090.00 1,8263133ELH80 0.680 1,655Federal Home Loan Bank1281 500,000.00 499,850.00 06/13/20250.50006/03/2020 502,735.00 1,8363130AJKW8 0.506 1,672Federal Home Loan Bank1283 300,000.00 300,000.00 06/30/20250.68006/30/2020 299,919.00 1,8263130AJRP6 0.680 1,717Federal National Mtg Assn1288 500,000.00 500,000.00 08/14/20250.50008/14/2020 497,675.00 1,8263135G05S8 0.500 1,721Federal National Mtg Assn1290 500,000.00 499,750.00 08/18/20250.52008/28/2020 497,925.00 1,8163136G4M75 0.530 1,724Federal National Mtg Assn1289 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 08/21/20250.56008/21/2020 994,760.00 1,8263136G4N74 0.560 1,812Federal National Mtg Assn1292 500,000.00 499,250.00 11/17/20250.56011/17/2020 499,560.00 1,8263135GA2Z3 0.590 16,013,392.36 1,60316,398,671.5016,050,000.0015,464,217.36Subtotal and Average 1,260 1.270 Treasury Coupon Securities 181U.S. Treasury1193 500,000.00 493,610.00 05/31/20211.37505/31/2019 503,240.00 731912828R77 2.030 211U.S. Treasury1045 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 5,030,100.00 1,808912828S27 1.125 334U.S. Treasury1070 2,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 2,020,540.00 1,679912828T67 1.903 530U.S. Treasury1192 500,000.00 496,650.00 05/15/20221.75005/31/2019 511,740.00 1,080912828SV3 1.984 668U.S. Treasury1178 500,000.00 489,687.50 09/30/20221.87503/01/2019 515,800.00 1,3099128282W9 2.480 1,033U.S. Treasury1217 500,000.00 499,300.00 09/30/20231.37508/21/2019 516,915.00 1,501912828T26 1.410 1,460U.S. Treasury1241 1,000,000.00 989,687.50 11/30/20241.50012/16/2019 1,048,710.00 1,811912828YV6 1.718 9,911,735.00 1,65310,147,045.0010,000,000.009,911,735.00Subtotal and Average 438 1.506 Certificate of Deposits 21Freedom Credit Union1111 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/22/20202.05012/22/2017 245,287.26 1,09635638BAA9 2.052 44Bankers Bank1086 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 240,500.93 1,28006610RAP4 1.804 48Farm Bureau Bank1165 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/18/20213.00012/17/2018 248,968.64 763307660LC2 2.898 50Eagle Bank1146 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 245,943.92 91527002YDV5 2.858 62Infinty FCU1211 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/01/20212.10007/31/2019 248,833.08 55145667EDY1 2.110 83Comenity Capital Bank1009 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 240,850.95 1,82720033APG5 1.702 97Ally Bank Midvale1176 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/08/20212.50003/07/2019 246,525.62 73202007GHX4 2.016 105Unity Bank1120 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 246,687.37 1,09691330ABN6 2.552 139Amex Centurion1077 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 241,873.66 1,46102587DP85 2.252 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 49 Days to Maturity Page 3 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 150Towne Bank1128 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 242,563.73 1,09689214PBL2 2.803 176PrivateBank & Trust1032 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016 241,473.14 1,82674267GVG9 1.501 188Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/07/20212.25006/07/2017 242,491.26 1,46114042RGD7 2.252 225Central State Bank1085 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20211.85007/14/2017 242,367.64 1,46115523RBJ4 1.851 258General Electric Credit Union1150 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/16/20213.10008/15/2018 244,858.47 1,097369674AV8 3.100 300New York Community Bank1226 245,000.00 245,000.00 09/27/20211.80009/27/2019 248,086.75 731649447TC3 1.802 329Northpointe Bank1127 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/26/20212.70004/26/2018 245,265.40 1,279666613GV0 2.703 351First Source Bank1168 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/17/20213.15012/17/2018 251,770.44 1,06633646CKP8 3.153 356Belmont Savings Bank1102 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 249,324.55 1,462080515CD9 2.101 356TNB Bank1187 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/22/20212.40005/22/2019 253,114.05 91587266AAA1 2.407 385Neighbors FCU1167 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20213.20012/21/2018 252,519.35 1,09664017AAQ7 3.203 386United Credit Union1214 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/22/20212.00008/22/2019 252,443.70 853910160AH3 2.003 414The Ohio Valley Bank1089 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017 244,357.10 1,645677721CN0 1.903 426Third Federal Savings and Loan1112 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/31/20222.50001/30/2018 251,361.56 1,46288413QBY3 2.502 427Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/01/20222.25002/01/2017 245,508.80 1,8262546722U1 2.251 450BMW Bank1067 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/24/20222.20002/24/2017 245,654.32 1,82605580AGK4 2.201 454Maine Savings FCU1171 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20223.30012/28/2018 257,339.67 1,158560507AK1 3.306 472Luana Savings Bank1225 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/18/20221.60009/18/2019 249,156.67 912549104JN8 1.599 484Bellco Credit Union1264 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/30/20221.30003/31/2020 251,344.02 72907833EAD9 1.300 485Cadence Bank, NA1259 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/31/20221.20003/31/2020 248,004.77 73012738RFX7 1.200 485Bank of Santa Clarita1261 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20221.10003/31/2020 250,709.61 73006424KBC3 1.100 511Goldman Sachs1078 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/26/20222.40004/26/2017 247,157.35 1,82638148PJK4 2.401 514Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/29/20222.80004/30/2018 248,574.33 1,46030960QAG2 2.802 532Kansas State Bank1101 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/17/20222.10011/17/2017 251,554.31 1,64250116CBE8 2.099 548Synchrony Bank Retail1080 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/02/20222.40006/02/2017 247,733.43 1,82687164XQV1 2.401 554PCSB Bank1149 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/08/20223.00006/08/2018 255,246.45 1,46169324MAD7 3.002 555Synovus Bank1253 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/09/20221.60003/09/2020 249,976.52 82287164DRD4 1.602 559Allegiance Bank1143 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/13/20223.10006/13/2018 255,712.27 1,46101748DBE5 3.102 567Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/21/20222.35006/21/2017 247,811.49 1,826795450A70 2.351 574America's Credit Union1200 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/28/20222.30006/28/2019 255,978.61 1,09603065AAL7 2.302 615Traditions Bank1148 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/08/20223.00006/08/2018 256,442.76 1,52289269CBX9 3.002 630CIT Bank NA1219 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/23/20221.90008/23/2019 252,004.13 1,09612556LBA3 1.902 636American Express Fed Savings B1096 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/29/20222.40008/29/2017 249,043.14 1,82602587CFU9 2.402 636Sterling Bank1201 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/29/20222.15006/28/2019 253,151.06 1,15885916VDC6 2.153 681Alliance Credit Union1095 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/13/20222.25010/13/2017 254,268.82 1,82601859BAA3 2.251 693Barclays Bank1097 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/25/20222.30010/25/2017 249,469.75 1,82606740KLJ4 2.291 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 50 Days to Maturity Page 4 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 696Merrick Bank1163 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/28/20223.25010/30/2018 262,383.15 1,45959013J4K2 3.252 707Mountain America Federal CU1099 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/08/20222.30011/08/2017 254,906.27 1,82662384RAC0 2.301 717CrossFirst Bank1106 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20222.20011/20/2017 254,558.43 1,82422766ACB9 2.201 727Enterprise Bank, NA1107 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/28/20222.15011/28/2017 254,444.14 1,82629367QCP1 2.151 736Medallion Bank1169 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.40012/07/2018 264,049.80 1,46158404DCX7 3.402 736Red Rocks Credit Union1166 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.35012/07/2018 263,796.57 1,46175701LAB3 3.352 758Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/29/20222.40012/29/2017 256,175.46 1,826499724AB8 2.401 759Kern FCU1239 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.90012/30/2019 256,700.07 1,09649228XAK6 1.902 759San Francisco FCU1240 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.85012/30/2019 256,438.96 1,09679772FAC0 1.852 790Wells Fargo Natl Bank West1244 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/30/20231.90001/29/2020 257,037.42 1,097949495AT2 1.900 812Servisfirst Bank1254 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20231.60002/21/2020 255,612.55 1,09681768PAF3 1.601 819Verus Bank of Commerce1180 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20232.70002/28/2019 261,874.34 1,46192535LCD4 2.700 841Aneca Federal Credit Union1119 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018 259,619.02 1,826034577AH9 2.802 850Northstar Bank1263 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 253,283.72 1,09566704MEQ0 1.150 850West Michigan Cmnty Bk1265 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 253,283.72 1,095954444BS3 1.150 861Citibank NA1123 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/11/20232.90004/11/2018 260,531.73 1,82617312QJ26 2.902 878Congressional Bank1189 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20232.50004/30/2019 261,625.03 1,45920726ABA5 2.502 878EnerBank USA1125 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/28/20232.95004/30/2018 255,814.43 1,82429278TAY6 2.952 885First National Bank1179 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/05/20232.80003/05/2019 263,539.77 1,52232117BCX4 2.802 895University of Iowa Comm. CU1134 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/15/20233.05005/14/2018 256,696.31 1,82791435LAG2 3.052 918Pittsfield Cooperative Bank1194 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/07/20232.50006/07/2019 259,018.45 1,461725404AB3 2.502 931Morton Community1173 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/20/20232.75003/20/2019 263,997.58 1,553619165JD6 2.753 931RCB Bank1144 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/20/20233.15006/20/2018 263,332.71 1,82674934YAH4 3.152 937American First CU1285 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/26/20230.35006/26/2020 248,644.01 1,09502616AAH2 0.350 960American National Bank1205 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/19/20232.00007/19/2019 259,525.32 1,46102772JBD1 2.001 961First National Bank of America1147 245,000.00 245,000.00 07/20/20233.15007/20/2018 263,900.50 1,82632110YLK9 3.152 972Bank of New England1151 249,000.00 249,000.00 07/31/20233.25007/31/2018 269,056.70 1,82606426KAN8 3.252 995Raymond James Bank1218 244,000.00 244,000.00 08/23/20231.95008/23/2019 255,387.42 1,46175472RAD3 1.951 1,032Triad Bank1262 248,000.00 248,000.00 09/29/20231.35003/30/2020 255,734.18 1,27889579NCD3 1.352 1,050Marlin Business Bank1155 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/17/20233.30010/17/2018 269,909.45 1,82657116ARV2 3.302 1,050Municipal Trust and Savings1160 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.20010/17/2018 265,931.96 1,826625925AR3 3.202 1,050UBS Bank USA1161 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.35010/17/2018 267,000.64 1,82690348JEJ5 3.352 1,052Jefferson Financial CU1154 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20233.35010/19/2018 267,029.70 1,826474067AQ8 3.352 1,079Commercial Bank1162 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/15/20233.40011/15/2018 271,229.32 1,82620143PDV9 3.402 1,092Numerica Credit Union1164 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/28/20233.55011/28/2018 272,632.60 1,82667054NAN3 3.552 1,115National Cooperative Bank, N.A1170 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20233.40012/21/2018 268,672.67 1,826635573AL2 3.402 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 51 Days to Maturity Page 5 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,123Bar Harbor Bank and Trust1172 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/29/20233.35012/31/2018 271,762.02 1,824066851WJ1 3.352 1,154Lakeside Bank1208 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/29/20242.00007/30/2019 261,671.44 1,64451210SQU4 2.003 1,168Rollstone B&T1251 245,000.00 245,000.00 02/12/20241.65002/12/2020 255,841.82 1,46177579ADF0 1.651 1,169Northwest Bank1181 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/13/20242.95002/13/2019 269,420.03 1,82666736ABP3 2.951 1,183Wells Fargo1174 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/27/20243.00002/27/2019 270,081.08 1,826949763XY7 3.001 1,213Texas Bank Financial1260 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/28/20241.10003/31/2020 251,696.14 1,458882213AB7 1.101 1,231The Jefferson Bank1272 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/15/20241.25004/15/2020 256,097.75 1,461472382AQ3 1.251 1,232Belmont Bank and Trust1270 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/16/20241.25004/16/2020 256,104.29 1,46108016PDQ9 1.251 1,232Pacific Western Bank1269 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/16/20241.30004/16/2020 253,418.27 1,46169506YRH4 1.301 1,242Main Street Bank1188 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/26/20242.60004/26/2019 267,670.30 1,82756065GAG3 2.603 1,261First Service Bank1231 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/15/20241.70011/15/2019 260,132.57 1,64333640VDD7 1.701 1,262JP Morgan Chase1185 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/16/20243.25005/16/2019 270,240.93 1,82748128HXU7 3.254 1,269Iowa State Bank1186 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/23/20242.40005/23/2019 263,067.84 1,82746256YAZ2 2.403 1,274Live Oak Bank1238 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/28/20241.80011/27/2019 261,130.52 1,644538036GV0 1.802 1,275Century Next Bank1184 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/29/20242.50005/29/2019 267,260.88 1,827156634AK3 2.503 1,284Plains Commerce Bank1195 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/07/20242.55006/07/2019 264,529.42 1,82772651LCL6 2.553 1,289Evansville Teachers Credit FCU1196 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/12/20242.60006/12/2019 268,299.65 1,827299547AQ2 2.603 1,296Legacy Bank1197 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/19/20242.40006/19/2019 266,632.18 1,827524661CB9 2.403 1,298Citizens State Bank1199 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/21/20242.40006/21/2019 266,660.75 1,827176688CP2 2.403 1,305Communitywide FCU1202 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/28/20242.25006/28/2019 265,418.80 1,82720416TAQ5 2.253 1,305Revere Bank1203 247,000.00 247,000.00 06/28/20242.30006/28/2019 264,782.44 1,827761402BY1 2.303 1,333Abacus Federal Savings1207 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/26/20241.95007/26/2019 263,001.88 1,82700257TBD7 1.952 1,337First Security Bank of WA1209 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/30/20242.00007/30/2019 263,448.06 1,82733625CCP2 2.002 1,338People's Bank1210 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/31/20242.00007/31/2019 263,402.76 1,827710571DS6 2.002 1,354Preferred Bank1213 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/16/20242.00008/16/2019 264,706.24 1,827740367HP5 2.002 1,361FirsTier Bank1216 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/23/20241.95008/23/2019 264,318.72 1,82733766LAJ7 1.952 1,361Washington Federal1215 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/23/20242.00008/23/2019 263,723.50 1,827938828BH2 2.002 1,368First State Bk DeQueen1222 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/30/20241.80008/30/2019 261,871.27 1,827336460CX6 1.802 1,368First Natl Bk of Syracuse1221 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/30/20241.85008/30/2019 263,397.72 1,827334342CD2 1.852 1,368Celtic Bank1220 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/30/20241.85008/30/2019 262,339.89 1,82715118RRH2 1.852 1,396BankWest Inc1227 248,000.00 248,000.00 09/27/20241.70009/27/2019 261,196.91 1,82706652CHB0 1.702 1,424Southern Bancorp Bk1286 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/25/20240.50006/26/2020 249,706.68 1,58284223QAN7 0.500 1,437Sauk Valley B&T Co1235 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/07/20241.70011/07/2019 261,470.47 1,827804375DL4 1.702 1,450Morgan Stanley Bank1237 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/20/20241.95011/20/2019 260,867.87 1,82761690UNX4 1.952 1,450Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1236 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/20/20241.90011/20/2019 260,377.82 1,82761760A3B3 1.902 1,490Bank Princeton1287 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20240.50006/30/2020 249,590.74 1,644064520BG3 0.500 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 52 Days to Maturity Page 6 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,529United Community1249 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/07/20251.65002/07/2020 261,577.08 1,82790983WBT7 1.652 1,536First National Bank Michigan1250 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/14/20251.65002/14/2020 261,638.72 1,82732114VBT3 1.652 1,536Freedom Financial1248 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/14/20251.55002/14/2020 260,587.97 1,82735637RDC8 1.552 1,543American State1255 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20251.60002/21/2020 261,172.62 1,827029728BC5 1.602 1,549Citadel FCU1252 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/27/20251.65002/27/2020 261,753.22 1,82717286TAG0 1.652 1,563Access Bank1256 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/13/20251.60003/13/2020 261,265.07 1,82600435JBH5 1.601 1,570Spring Bank1257 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/20/20251.50003/20/2020 260,250.33 1,826849430BF9 1.501 1,576Axos Bank1258 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/26/20251.65003/26/2020 261,913.33 1,82605465DAE8 1.651 1,578Alma Bank1267 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/28/20251.40003/30/2020 259,233.16 1,824020080BX4 1.399 1,581Commonwealth Business Bk1268 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.25003/31/2020 257,467.33 1,8262027506M2 1.251 1,581Nicolet Natl Bank1266 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.40003/31/2020 259,088.45 1,826654062JZ2 1.401 1,589Capital One USA FDIC339541271 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/08/20251.60004/08/2020 258,232.92 1,82614042TDD6 1.601 1,609Firrst Natl Bk McGregor1274 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20251.35004/28/2020 258,823.15 1,82632112UDR9 1.351 1,610First Freedom Bank1273 249,000.00 249,000.00 04/29/20251.20004/29/2020 258,215.95 1,82632027BAL1 1.201 1,611Flagstar1276248,000.00 248,000.00 04/30/20251.25004/30/2020 257,637.56 1,82633847E3A3 1.251 1,6231st Internet Bank1278 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/12/20251.00005/11/2020 254,943.56 1,82732056GDJ6 0.985 1,624Western State Bank1277 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/13/20251.00005/13/2020 251,858.26 1,82695960NKD8 1.001 1,666Chippewa Valley Bk1284 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/24/20250.60006/24/2020 250,492.49 1,826169894AS1 0.600 33,194,000.00 1,55734,674,175.7733,194,000.0033,373,666.67Subtotal and Average 925 2.162 Corporate Notes 246Apple Inc1079 500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 503,780.00 1,514037833CC2 1.900 432Proctor and Gamble1159 500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 512,285.00 1,210742718DY2 3.071 744Wal-Mart Stores, Inc1190 500,000.00 496,650.00 12/15/20222.35004/16/2019 520,745.00 1,339931142DU4 2.799 792Colgate-Palmolive1175 500,000.00 485,250.00 02/01/20231.95003/04/2019 519,285.00 1,43019416QEA4 2.751 980Microsoft Corporation1157 400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 417,584.00 1,758594918BQ6 3.222 2,341,260.00 1,4362,473,679.002,400,000.002,341,260.00Subtotal and Average 622 2.725 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 1US Bank1058 29.27 29.2707/01/2016 29.27 1SYS1058 0.000 29.27 129.2729.2729.27Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1CalPERS CERBT Plan1114 1,785,913.46 1,785,913.4607/01/2020 1,785,913.46 1SYS1114 0.000 1,785,913.46 11,785,913.461,785,913.461,785,913.46Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 53 Days to Maturity Page 7 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date PARS Pension Trust 1Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Serv1230 10,861,312.47 10,861,312.4707/01/2020 10,861,312.47 1SYS1230 0.000 10,861,312.47 110,861,312.4710,861,312.4710,431,603.26Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 632152,689,229.21 153,884,727.61 369 1.013156,352,930.09 153,701,114.97Total and Average Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 54 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund November 1, 2020 - November 30, 2020 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 500,000.001288500,000.00 0.500FNMA 208.34 0.00 208.340.507101500,000.003135G05S8 0.00 495,950.001206500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.17 0.00 729.171.789101495,950.003135G0V75 0.00 992,100.0012331,000,000.00 1.375FNMA 1,145.84 0.00 1,145.841.405101992,100.003135G0W33 0.00 1,000,000.0012891,000,000.00 0.560FNMA 466.67 0.00 466.670.5681011,000,000.003136G4N74 0.00 499,750.001290500,000.00 0.520FNMA 216.67 0.00 216.670.527101499,750.003136G4M75 0.00 499,250.001292500,000.00 0.560FNMA 108.89 0.00 108.890.5691010.003135GA2Z3 0.00 499,250.001291500,000.00 0.420FNMA 75.83 0.00 75.830.4261010.003135G06E8 0.00 1,000,000.0012791,000,000.00 0.625FHLMC 520.83 0.00 520.830.6341011,000,000.003134GVYG7 0.00 998,500.0012751,000,000.00 0.700FHLMC 583.34 0.00 583.340.711101998,500.003134GVLC0 0.00 999,217.3612471,000,000.00 1.400FFCB 1,166.67 0.00 1,166.671.421101999,217.363133EGWJ0 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 583.33 0.00 583.332.870101247,275.003133EJYL7 0.00 996,900.0012341,000,000.00 1.600FFCB 1,333.33 0.00 1,333.331.627101996,900.003133EK4X1 0.00 499,500.001198500,000.00 1.875FFCB 781.25 0.00 781.251.903101499,500.003133EKQP4 0.00 998,600.0012421,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.66 0.00 1,416.661.726101998,600.003133ELEA8 0.00 499,500.001212500,000.00 1.850FFCB 770.84 0.00 770.841.878101499,500.003133EKWV4 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.737101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 999,000.0012461,000,000.00 1.430FFCB 1,191.67 0.00 1,191.671.451101999,000.003133ELNE0 0.00 500,000.001282500,000.00 0.680FFCB 283.33 0.00 283.330.689101500,000.003133ELH80 0.00 499,400.001223500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.67 0.00 666.671.624101499,400.003133EKZK5 0.00 498,750.001224500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.66 0.00 666.661.626101498,750.003133EKP75 0.00 499,850.001280500,000.00 0.500FFCB 208.33 0.00 208.330.507101499,850.003133ELH23 0.00 499,850.001281500,000.00 0.500FHLB 208.34 0.00 208.340.507101499,850.003130AJKW8 0.00 300,000.001283300,000.00 0.680FHLB 170.00 0.00 170.000.689101300,000.003130AJRP6 0.00 498,550.001177500,000.00 2.500FHLB 1,041.67 0.00 1,041.672.542101498,550.003130AFW94 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,071.82 0.00 2,071.821.2971011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 496,650.001192500,000.00 1.750USTR 719.62 0.00 719.621.763101496,650.00912828SV3 0.00 499,300.001217500,000.00 1.375USTR 566.62 0.00 566.621.381101499,300.00912828T26 0.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,585.60 0.00 4,585.601.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 989,687.5012411,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,229.73 0.00 1,229.731.512101989,687.50912828YV6 0.00 493,610.001193500,000.00 1.375USTR 563.63 0.00 563.631.389101493,610.00912828R77 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:08 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.155 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest November 1, 2020 - November 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 489,687.501178500,000.00 1.875USTR 772.66 0.00 772.661.920101489,687.509128282W9 0.00 248,000.001174248,000.00 3.000WELLS 611.51 0.00 611.513.000101248,000.00949763XY7 0.00 763,093.001057763,093.00WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.01101453,624.174159282482 0.00 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 473.43 0.00 473.432.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 443.83 0.00 443.832.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 433.97 0.00 433.972.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 248,000.001169248,000.00 3.400MEDBA 693.04 0.00 693.043.400101248,000.0058404DCX7 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 453.70 0.00 453.702.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 503.42 0.00 503.422.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 662.47 0.00 662.473.250101248,000.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 552.33 0.00 552.332.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 248,000.001173248,000.00 2.750MORTN 560.55 0.00 560.552.750101248,000.00619165JD6 0.00 245,000.001271245,000.00 1.600CAPONE 322.20 0.00 322.201.600101245,000.0014042TDD6 0.00 245,000.001176245,000.00 2.500ALLY 503.42 0.00 503.422.500101245,000.0002007GHX4 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 335.34 0.00 335.341.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 295.89 0.00 295.891.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 56,275,840.36105556,275,840.36 0.576LAIF 29,305.13 0.00 29,305.130.62310157,275,840.3698-33-434 0.00 0.0012930.00BNY 1.20 0.00 1.201010.00SYS1293 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 443.83 0.00 443.832.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.83 0.00 645.831.594101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 473.43 0.00 473.432.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 0.0010810.00 1.800RICHMN 265.81 0.00 265.811.800101245,000.00319267GC8 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 443.83 0.00 443.832.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 463.56 0.00 463.562.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 364.93 0.00 364.931.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 355.07 0.00 355.071.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 374.79 0.00 374.791.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 453.08 0.00 453.082.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 473.43 0.00 473.432.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 463.15 0.00 463.152.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 422.88 0.00 422.882.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 422.87 0.00 422.872.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 443.01 0.00 443.012.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 432.95 0.00 432.952.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001236245,000.00 1.900MSPRIV 382.61 0.00 382.611.900101245,000.0061760A3B3 0.00 245,000.001237245,000.00 1.950MORGST 392.67 0.00 392.671.950101245,000.0061690UNX4 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 483.29 0.00 483.292.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:08 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.156 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest November 1, 2020 - November 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 245,000.001111245,000.00 2.050FREECU 412.80 0.00 412.802.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 1,785,913.4611141,785,913.46CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001011,785,913.46SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 666.67 0.00 666.672.144101378,360.00594918BQ6 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 563.84 0.00 563.842.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 513.49 0.00 513.492.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 583.97 0.00 583.972.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 581.92 0.00 581.922.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 552.33 0.00 552.332.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 532.60 0.00 532.602.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 601.64 0.00 601.643.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001226245,000.00 1.800NYCMBK 362.46 0.00 362.461.800101245,000.00649447TC3 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 624.24 0.00 624.243.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 634.32 0.00 634.323.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 573.90 0.00 573.902.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 634.32 0.00 634.323.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 604.11 0.00 604.113.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 604.11 0.00 604.113.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 611.51 0.00 611.513.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 665.14 0.00 665.143.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 2,853,747.8211532,853,747.82 0.140CAMP 317.60 0.00 317.600.1351012,853,430.22SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 674.59 0.00 674.593.350101245,000.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 672.66 0.00 672.663.300101248,000.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 958.33 0.00 958.332.390101487,950.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 644.38 0.00 644.383.200101245,000.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 674.59 0.00 674.593.350101245,000.0090348JEJ5 0.00 248,000.001162248,000.00 3.400COMMBK 693.04 0.00 693.043.400101248,000.0020143PDV9 0.00 248,000.001164248,000.00 3.550NMRCA 723.62 0.00 723.623.550101248,000.0067054NAN3 0.00 248,000.001165248,000.00 3.000FARMBU 611.51 0.00 611.513.000101248,000.00307660LC2 0.00 248,000.001166248,000.00 3.350REDRCK 682.85 0.00 682.853.350101248,000.0075701LAB3 0.00 245,000.001167245,000.00 3.200NEIGH 644.38 0.00 644.383.200101245,000.0064017AAQ7 0.00 245,000.001168245,000.00 3.1501STSRC 634.32 0.00 634.323.150101245,000.0033646CKP8 0.00 245,000.001170245,000.00 3.400NLCOOP 684.66 0.00 684.663.400101245,000.00635573AL2 0.00 248,000.001171248,000.00 3.300MAINE 672.65 0.00 672.653.300101248,000.00560507AK1 0.00 248,000.001172248,000.00 3.350BARHAR 682.85 0.00 682.853.350101248,000.00066851WJ1 0.00 485,250.001175500,000.00 1.950COLGTE 812.50 0.00 812.502.037101485,250.0019416QEA4 0.00 248,000.001179248,000.00 2.8001STNBK 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101248,000.0032117BCX4 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:08 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.157 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest November 1, 2020 - November 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001180248,000.00 2.700VERUS 550.35 0.00 550.352.700101248,000.0092535LCD4 0.00 248,000.001181248,000.00 2.950NRTHWS 601.32 0.00 601.322.950101248,000.0066736ABP3 0.00 248,000.001184248,000.00 2.500CENTNX 509.60 0.00 509.602.500101248,000.00156634AK3 0.00 245,000.001185245,000.00 3.250JPMORG 654.45 0.00 654.453.250101245,000.0048128HXU7 0.00 245,000.001186245,000.00 2.400IOWAST 483.29 0.00 483.292.400101245,000.0046256YAZ2 0.00 248,000.001187248,000.00 2.400TSCOLA 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101248,000.0087266AAA1 0.00 248,000.001188248,000.00 2.600MAINST 529.97 0.00 529.972.600101248,000.0056065GAG3 0.00 248,000.001189248,000.00 2.500CONGRS 509.59 0.00 509.592.500101248,000.0020726ABA5 0.00 496,650.001190500,000.00 2.350WALMRT 979.17 0.00 979.172.399101496,650.00931142DU4 0.00 245,000.001194245,000.00 2.500PITTS 503.43 0.00 503.432.500101245,000.00725404AB3 0.00 245,000.001195245,000.00 2.550PLAINS 513.49 0.00 513.492.550101245,000.0072651LCL6 0.00 248,000.001196248,000.00 2.600EVNSCU 529.97 0.00 529.972.600101248,000.00299547AQ2 0.00 248,000.001197248,000.00 2.400LEGCY 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101248,000.00524661CB9 0.00 248,000.001199248,000.00 2.400CTZNST 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101248,000.00176688CP2 0.00 248,000.001200248,000.00 2.300AMERCU 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101248,000.0003065AAL7 0.00 245,000.001201245,000.00 2.150STRLNG 432.95 0.00 432.952.150101245,000.0085916VDC6 0.00 248,000.001202248,000.00 2.250COMMW 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101248,000.0020416TAQ5 0.00 247,000.001203247,000.00 2.300REVER 466.93 0.00 466.932.300101247,000.00761402BY1 0.00 248,000.001205248,000.00 2.000AMRNTL 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.0002772JBD1 0.00 248,000.001207248,000.00 1.950ABACUS 397.48 0.00 397.481.950101248,000.0000257TBD7 0.00 248,000.001208248,000.00 2.000LKSIDE 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.0051210SQU4 0.00 248,000.001209248,000.00 2.0001STSEC 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.0033625CCP2 0.00 248,000.001210248,000.00 2.000PEOPLE 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.00710571DS6 0.00 248,000.001211248,000.00 2.100NFNITY 428.05 0.00 428.052.100101248,000.0045667EDY1 0.00 249,000.001213249,000.00 2.000PREFRD 409.32 0.00 409.322.000101249,000.00740367HP5 0.00 248,000.001214248,000.00 2.000UNTDCU 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.00910160AH3 0.00 248,000.001215248,000.00 2.000WSHFED 407.67 0.00 407.672.000101248,000.00938828BH2 0.00 249,000.001216249,000.00 1.9501STIER 399.08 0.00 399.081.950101249,000.0033766LAJ7 0.00 244,000.001218244,000.00 1.950RAYJAM 391.07 0.00 391.071.950101244,000.0075472RAD3 0.00 245,000.001219245,000.00 1.900CITBNK 382.60 0.00 382.601.900101245,000.0012556LBA3 0.00 248,000.001220248,000.00 1.850CELTIC 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101248,000.0015118RRH2 0.00 249,000.001221249,000.00 1.8501STNBS 378.62 0.00 378.621.850101249,000.00334342CD2 0.00 248,000.001222248,000.00 1.8001STDQN 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101248,000.00336460CX6 0.00 245,000.001225245,000.00 1.600LUANA 322.19 0.00 322.191.600101245,000.00549104JN8 0.00 2,628,359.4012282,628,359.40BOTW 0.01 0.00 0.011012,212,787.36059731851 0.00 248,000.001227248,000.00 1.700BNKWST 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101248,000.0006652CHB0 0.00 10,861,312.47123010,861,312.47PARS 0.00 0.00 0.0010110,416,785.70SYS1230 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:08 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.158 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 5 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest November 1, 2020 - November 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001231248,000.00 1.7001STSER 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101248,000.0033640VDD7 0.00 248,000.001235248,000.00 1.700SAUKVL 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101248,000.00804375DL4 0.00 248,000.001238248,000.00 1.800LIVEOK 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101248,000.00538036GV0 0.00 248,000.001239248,000.00 1.900KERNCU 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101248,000.0049228XAK6 0.00 248,000.001240248,000.00 1.850SF FCU 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101248,000.0079772FAC0 0.00 248,000.001244248,000.00 1.900WFNBW 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101248,000.00949495AT2 0.00 248,000.001248248,000.00 1.550FRDMFI 315.95 0.00 315.951.550101248,000.0035637RDC8 0.00 248,000.001249248,000.00 1.650UNTDCM 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.0090983WBT7 0.00 248,000.001250248,000.00 1.6501STNMI 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.0032114VBT3 0.00 245,000.001251245,000.00 1.650RLLSTN 332.26 0.00 332.261.650101245,000.0077579ADF0 0.00 248,000.001252248,000.00 1.650CITADL 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.0017286TAG0 0.00 245,000.001253245,000.00 1.600SYNOVS 322.19 0.00 322.191.600101245,000.0087164DRD4 0.00 248,000.001254248,000.00 1.600SERVIS 326.14 0.00 326.141.600101248,000.0081768PAF3 0.00 248,000.001255248,000.00 1.600AMERST 326.14 0.00 326.141.600101248,000.00029728BC5 0.00 248,000.001256248,000.00 1.600ACCSS 326.14 0.00 326.141.600101248,000.0000435JBH5 0.00 248,000.001257248,000.00 1.500SPRING 305.76 0.00 305.761.500101248,000.00849430BF9 0.00 248,000.001258248,000.00 1.650AXOS 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.0005465DAE8 0.00 245,000.001259245,000.00 1.200CADNCE 241.64 0.00 241.641.200101245,000.0012738RFX7 0.00 245,000.001260245,000.00 1.100TEXAS 221.51 0.00 221.511.100101245,000.00882213AB7 0.00 248,000.001261248,000.00 1.100SNTCLR 224.22 0.00 224.221.100101248,000.0006424KBC3 0.00 248,000.001262248,000.00 1.350TRIAD 275.18 0.00 275.181.350101248,000.0089579NCD3 0.00 248,000.001263248,000.00 1.150NRTHSR 234.41 0.00 234.411.150101248,000.0066704MEQ0 0.00 248,000.001264248,000.00 1.300BELLCO 264.99 0.00 264.991.300101248,000.0007833EAD9 0.00 248,000.001265248,000.00 1.150WESTMI 234.41 0.00 234.411.150101248,000.00954444BS3 0.00 248,000.001266248,000.00 1.400NCOLET 285.37 0.00 285.371.400101248,000.00654062JZ2 0.00 248,000.001267248,000.00 1.400ALMABK 285.37 0.00 285.371.400101248,000.00020080BX4 0.00 248,000.001268248,000.00 1.250CMWBUS 254.79 0.00 254.791.250101248,000.002027506M2 0.00 245,000.001269245,000.00 1.300PACWST 261.78 0.00 261.781.300101245,000.0069506YRH4 0.00 248,000.001270248,000.00 1.250BELB&T 254.79 0.00 254.791.250101248,000.0008016PDQ9 0.00 248,000.001272248,000.00 1.250THEJEF 254.80 0.00 254.801.250101248,000.00472382AQ3 0.00 249,000.001273249,000.00 1.2001STFDM 245.60 0.00 245.601.200101249,000.0032027BAL1 0.00 248,000.001274248,000.00 1.3501STMCG 275.18 0.00 275.181.350101248,000.0032112UDR9 0.00 248,000.001276248,000.00 1.250FLGSTR 254.79 0.00 254.791.250101248,000.0033847E3A3 0.00 245,000.001277245,000.00 1.000WSTRNS 201.37 0.00 201.371.000101245,000.0095960NKD8 0.00 248,000.001278248,000.00 1.0001STINT 203.84 0.00 203.841.000101248,000.0032056GDJ6 0.00 248,000.001284248,000.00 0.600CHIPVA 122.30 0.00 122.300.600101248,000.00169894AS1 0.00 248,000.001285248,000.00 0.350AMR1ST 71.34 0.00 71.340.350101248,000.0002616AAH2 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:08 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.159 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 6 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest November 1, 2020 - November 30, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001286248,000.00 0.500STHRNB 101.92 0.00 101.920.500101248,000.0084223QAN7 0.00 248,000.001287248,000.00 0.500BKPRNC 101.92 0.00 101.920.500101248,000.00064520BG3 0.00 246,860.661294246,860.66DREYF 0.00 0.00 0.00101246,571.36X9USDDTP3 0.00 137,062,427.17Subtotal 136,878,814.53 1.066 119,489.360.00119,489.36135,955,139.99 0.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 29.27105829.27USBANK 0.01 0.00 0.010.41623129.27SYS1058 0.00 29.27Subtotal 29.27 0.416 0.010.000.0129.27 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 277,123.881062277,123.88LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241265,528.67SYS1062 0.00 277,123.88Subtotal 277,123.88 0.000.000.00265,528.67 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 16,545,147.29111316,545,147.29 0.576LAIF 8,533.18 0.00 8,533.180.62724916,545,147.2925-33-005 0.00 16,545,147.29Subtotal 16,545,147.29 0.627 8,533.180.008,533.1816,545,147.29 0.00 153,884,727.61Total 153,701,114.97 1.017 128,022.550.00128,022.55152,765,845.22 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:08 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.160 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management December 31, 2020 City of La Quinta - Portfolio Summary % of Portfolio Book ValueInvestmentsMarket Value Par Value Days to MaturityTerm YTM 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 7,270,801.59 14.86 0.00017,270,801.597,270,801.59 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 53,275,840.36 135.61 0.540153,612,187.5653,275,840.36 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 10,545,147.29 17.05 0.540110,627,431.3010,545,147.29 Money Market/Mutual Funds 490,015.12 10.33 0.0001490,015.12490,015.12 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 853,848.56 10.57 0.1201853,848.56853,848.56 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 19,008,092.36 1,62112.71 1.1461,30419,426,886.5019,050,000.00 Treasury Coupon Securities 9,911,735.00 1,6536.63 1.50640710,137,935.0010,000,000.00 Certificate of Deposits 32,949,000.00 1,56022.02 2.16390134,394,918.9932,949,000.00 Corporate Notes 2,341,260.00 1,4361.56 2.7255912,470,415.002,400,000.00 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 29.27 10.00 0.000129.2729.27 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1,933,023.17 11.29 0.00011,933,023.171,933,023.17 PARS Pension Trust 11,025,029.02 17.37 0.000111,025,029.0211,025,029.02 149,603,821.74 100.00%Investments 152,242,521.08149,792,734.38 682 401 0.996 Current Year December 31 127,750.49 Fiscal Year To Date 853,303.12 Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 147,790,286.26 158,072,232.75 1.07%1.02% Total Earnings Month Ending I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. __________________________________________________ ____________________ Karla Romero, Finance Director Portfolio CITY CP Reporting period 12/01/2020-12/31/2020 Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:16 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.161 Days to Maturity Page 1 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Bank Accounts 1Bank of New York1293 0.00 0.0009/01/2020 0.00 1SYS1293 0.000 1Bank of the West1228 5,889,426.34 5,889,426.3408/20/2019 5,889,426.34 1059731851 0.000 1City Petty Cash1059 3,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS1059 0.000 1La Quinta Palms Realty1062 279,993.58 279,993.5807/01/2016 279,993.58 1SYS1062 0.000 1Stifel, Nicolaus & Company1183 0.00 0.0003/18/2019 0.00 1SYS1183 0.000 1Wells Fargo1057 1,098,081.67 1,098,081.6707/01/2016 1,098,081.67 14159282482 0.000 7,270,801.59 17,270,801.597,270,801.595,077,932.04Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 1Local Agency Inv Fund1055 53,275,840.36 53,275,840.36 0.54053,612,187.56 198-33-434 0.540 53,275,840.36 153,612,187.5653,275,840.3653,469,388.75Subtotal and Average 1 0.540 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 1Local Agency Inv Fund1113 10,545,147.29 10,545,147.29 0.54010,627,431.30 125-33-005 0.540 10,545,147.29 110,627,431.3010,545,147.2912,480,631.16Subtotal and Average 1 0.540 Money Market/Mutual Funds 1Dreyfus1294490,015.12 490,015.1209/24/2020 490,015.12 1X9USDDTP3 0.000 490,015.12 1490,015.12490,015.12325,833.38Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 1California Asset Management Pr1153 853,848.56 853,848.56 0.12009/26/2018 853,848.56 1SYS1153 0.120 853,848.56 1853,848.56853,848.56982,783.33Subtotal and Average 1 0.120 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 243Federal Farm Credit Bank1105 1,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 1,010,790.00 1,3923133EHWM1 1.913 613Federal National Mtg Assn1233 1,000,000.00 992,100.00 09/06/20221.37510/29/2019 1,021,280.00 1,0433135G0W33 1.659 636Federal Farm Credit Bank1247 1,000,000.00 999,217.36 09/29/20221.40002/05/2020 1,021,790.00 9673133EGWJ0 1.430 710Federal Farm Credit Bank1198 500,000.00 499,500.00 12/12/20221.87506/20/2019 516,570.00 1,2713133EKQP4 1.905 955Federal Farm Credit Bank1223 500,000.00 499,400.00 08/14/20231.60009/12/2019 517,870.00 1,4323133EKZK5 1.632 977Federal Farm Credit Bank1158 250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 267,097.50 1,7863133EJYL7 3.041 1,034Federal Farm Credit Bank1234 1,000,000.00 996,900.00 11/01/20231.60011/01/2019 1,038,310.00 1,4613133EK4X1 1.680 1,138Federal Home Loan Bank1177 500,000.00 498,550.00 02/13/20242.50003/01/2019 535,960.00 1,8103130AFW94 2.563 1,139Federal Farm Credit Bank1246 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/14/20241.43002/14/2020 1,036,710.00 1,4613133ELNE0 1.456 1,278Federal National Mtg Assn1206 500,000.00 495,950.00 07/02/20241.75007/15/2019 526,455.00 1,8143135G0V75 1.922 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:16 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 62 Days to Maturity Page 2 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 1,302Federal Farm Credit Bank1212 500,000.00 499,500.00 07/26/20241.85008/02/2019 527,980.00 1,8203133EKWV4 1.871 1,355Federal Farm Credit Bank1224 500,000.00 498,750.00 09/17/20241.60009/17/2019 525,320.00 1,8273133EKP75 1.652 1,355Federal Farm Credit Bank1242 1,000,000.00 998,600.00 09/17/20241.70012/17/2019 1,051,980.00 1,7363133ELEA8 1.731 1,417Federal National Mtg Assn1291 500,000.00 499,250.00 11/18/20240.42011/18/2020 500,050.00 1,4613135G06E8 0.458 1,459Federal National Mtg Assn1300 500,000.00 500,000.00 12/30/20240.40012/30/2020 500,290.00 1,4613135GAAW1 0.400 1,571Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1275 1,000,000.00 998,500.00 04/21/20250.70004/28/2020 1,000,150.00 1,8193134GVLC0 0.731 1,607Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1279 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 05/27/20250.62505/27/2020 1,000,470.00 1,8263134GVYG7 0.625 1,620Federal Farm Credit Bank1280 500,000.00 499,850.00 06/09/20250.50006/09/2020 502,090.00 1,8263133ELH23 0.506 1,621Federal Farm Credit Bank1282 500,000.00 500,000.00 06/10/20250.68006/10/2020 500,695.00 1,8263133ELH80 0.680 1,624Federal Home Loan Bank1281 500,000.00 499,850.00 06/13/20250.50006/03/2020 503,035.00 1,8363130AJKW8 0.506 1,641Federal Home Loan Bank1283 300,000.00 300,000.00 06/30/20250.68006/30/2020 300,066.00 1,8263130AJRP6 0.680 1,662Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1297 1,000,000.00 997,300.00 07/21/20250.37512/07/2020 1,000,530.00 1,6873137EAEU9 0.434 1,686Federal National Mtg Assn1288 500,000.00 500,000.00 08/14/20250.50008/14/2020 498,045.00 1,8263135G05S8 0.500 1,690Federal National Mtg Assn1290 500,000.00 499,750.00 08/18/20250.52008/28/2020 498,290.00 1,8163136G4M75 0.530 1,693Federal National Mtg Assn1289 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 08/21/20250.56008/21/2020 995,510.00 1,8263136G4N74 0.560 1,781Federal National Mtg Assn1292 500,000.00 499,250.00 11/17/20250.56011/17/2020 500,310.00 1,8263135GA2Z3 0.590 1,806Federal Home Loan Bank1298 500,000.00 497,400.00 12/12/20250.37512/07/2020 499,175.00 1,8313130AKFA9 0.480 1,817Federal National Mtg Assn1299 500,000.00 500,000.00 12/23/20250.60012/23/2020 529,540.00 1,8263135GA7D7 0.600 1,824Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1301 500,000.00 500,000.00 12/30/20250.55012/30/2020 500,528.00 1,8263134GXGZ1 0.550 19,008,092.36 1,62119,426,886.5019,050,000.0017,428,473.01Subtotal and Average 1,304 1.146 Treasury Coupon Securities 150U.S. Treasury1193 500,000.00 493,610.00 05/31/20211.37505/31/2019 502,580.00 731912828R77 2.030 180U.S. Treasury1045 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 5,025,000.00 1,808912828S27 1.125 303U.S. Treasury1070 2,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 2,018,600.00 1,679912828T67 1.903 499U.S. Treasury1192 500,000.00 496,650.00 05/15/20221.75005/31/2019 511,135.00 1,080912828SV3 1.984 637U.S. Treasury1178 500,000.00 489,687.50 09/30/20221.87503/01/2019 515,175.00 1,3099128282W9 2.480 1,002U.S. Treasury1217 500,000.00 499,300.00 09/30/20231.37508/21/2019 516,815.00 1,501912828T26 1.410 1,429U.S. Treasury1241 1,000,000.00 989,687.50 11/30/20241.50012/16/2019 1,048,630.00 1,811912828YV6 1.718 9,911,735.00 1,65310,137,935.0010,000,000.009,911,735.00Subtotal and Average 407 1.506 Certificate of Deposits 13Bankers Bank1086 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 240,156.78 1,28006610RAP4 1.804 17Farm Bureau Bank1165 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/18/20213.00012/17/2018 248,357.08 763307660LC2 2.898 19Eagle Bank1146 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 245,371.54 91527002YDV5 2.858 31Infinty FCU1211 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/01/20212.10007/31/2019 248,436.43 55145667EDY1 2.110 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:16 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 63 Days to Maturity Page 3 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 52Comenity Capital Bank1009 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 240,558.18 1,82720033APG5 1.702 66Ally Bank Midvale1176 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/08/20212.50003/07/2019 246,061.46 73202007GHX4 2.016 74Unity Bank1120 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 246,214.48 1,09691330ABN6 2.552 108Amex Centurion1077 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 241,480.76 1,46102587DP85 2.252 119Towne Bank1128 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 242,069.76 1,09689214PBL2 2.803 145PrivateBank & Trust1032 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016 241,234.66 1,82674267GVG9 1.501 157Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/07/20212.25006/07/2017 242,114.59 1,46114042RGD7 2.252 194Central State Bank1085 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20211.85007/14/2017 242,065.31 1,46115523RBJ4 1.851 227General Electric Credit Union1150 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/16/20213.10008/15/2018 244,297.42 1,097369674AV8 3.100 269New York Community Bank1226 245,000.00 245,000.00 09/27/20211.80009/27/2019 247,787.64 731649447TC3 1.802 298Northpointe Bank1127 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/26/20212.70004/26/2018 244,797.55 1,279666613GV0 2.703 320First Source Bank1168 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/17/20213.15012/17/2018 251,196.85 1,06633646CKP8 3.153 325Belmont Savings Bank1102 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 248,971.92 1,462080515CD9 2.101 325TNB Bank1187 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/22/20212.40005/22/2019 252,693.26 91587266AAA1 2.407 354Neighbors FCU1167 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20213.20012/21/2018 251,928.92 1,09664017AAQ7 3.203 355United Credit Union1214 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/22/20212.00008/22/2019 252,100.68 853910160AH3 2.003 383The Ohio Valley Bank1089 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017 243,980.62 1,645677721CN0 1.903 395Third Federal Savings and Loan1112 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/31/20222.50001/30/2018 250,832.26 1,46288413QBY3 2.502 396Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/01/20222.25002/01/2017 245,067.75 1,8262546722U1 2.251 419BMW Bank1067 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/24/20222.20002/24/2017 245,221.02 1,82605580AGK4 2.201 423Maine Savings FCU1171 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20223.30012/28/2018 256,657.00 1,158560507AK1 3.306 441Luana Savings Bank1225 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/18/20221.60009/18/2019 248,845.26 912549104JN8 1.599 453Bellco Credit Union1264 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/30/20221.30003/31/2020 251,064.70 72907833EAD9 1.300 454Cadence Bank, NA1259 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/31/20221.20003/31/2020 247,760.45 73012738RFX7 1.200 454Bank of Santa Clarita1261 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20221.10003/31/2020 250,483.62 73006424KBC3 1.100 480Goldman Sachs1078 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/26/20222.40004/26/2017 246,695.28 1,82638148PJK4 2.401 483Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/29/20222.80004/30/2018 248,029.74 1,46030960QAG2 2.802 501Kansas State Bank1101 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/17/20222.10011/17/2017 251,156.59 1,64250116CBE8 2.099 517Synchrony Bank Retail1080 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/02/20222.40006/02/2017 247,293.83 1,82687164XQV1 2.401 523PCSB Bank1149 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/08/20223.00006/08/2018 254,671.66 1,46169324MAD7 3.002 524Synovus Bank1253 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/09/20221.60003/09/2020 249,695.91 82287164DRD4 1.602 528Allegiance Bank1143 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/13/20223.10006/13/2018 255,116.72 1,46101748DBE5 3.102 536Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/21/20222.35006/21/2017 247,382.51 1,826795450A70 2.351 543America's Credit Union1200 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/28/20222.30006/28/2019 255,545.57 1,09603065AAL7 2.302 584Traditions Bank1148 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/08/20223.00006/08/2018 255,896.60 1,52289269CBX9 3.002 599CIT Bank NA1219 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/23/20221.90008/23/2019 251,689.86 1,09612556LBA3 1.902 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:16 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 64 Days to Maturity Page 4 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 605American Express Fed Savings B1096 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/29/20222.40008/29/2017 248,632.95 1,82602587CFU9 2.402 605Sterling Bank1201 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/29/20222.15006/28/2019 252,784.70 1,15885916VDC6 2.153 650Alliance Credit Union1095 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/13/20222.25010/13/2017 253,911.65 1,82601859BAA3 2.251 662Barclays Bank1097 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/25/20222.30010/25/2017 249,110.77 1,82606740KLJ4 2.291 665Merrick Bank1163 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/28/20223.25010/30/2018 261,810.84 1,45959013J4K2 3.252 676Mountain America Federal CU1099 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/08/20222.30011/08/2017 254,557.93 1,82662384RAC0 2.301 686CrossFirst Bank1106 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20222.20011/20/2017 254,232.29 1,82422766ACB9 2.201 696Enterprise Bank, NA1107 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/28/20222.15011/28/2017 254,129.75 1,82629367QCP1 2.151 705Medallion Bank1169 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.40012/07/2018 263,486.47 1,46158404DCX7 3.402 705Red Rocks Credit Union1166 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.35012/07/2018 263,243.81 1,46175701LAB3 3.352 727Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/29/20222.40012/29/2017 255,831.32 1,826499724AB8 2.401 728Kern FCU1239 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.90012/30/2019 256,473.51 1,09649228XAK6 1.902 728San Francisco FCU1240 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20221.85012/30/2019 256,222.96 1,09679772FAC0 1.852 759Wells Fargo Natl Bank West1244 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/30/20231.90001/29/2020 256,896.90 1,097949495AT2 1.900 781Servisfirst Bank1254 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20231.60002/21/2020 255,519.49 1,09681768PAF3 1.601 788Verus Bank of Commerce1180 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20232.70002/28/2019 261,551.88 1,46192535LCD4 2.700 810Aneca Federal Credit Union1119 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018 259,287.41 1,826034577AH9 2.802 819Northstar Bank1263 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 253,308.20 1,09566704MEQ0 1.150 819West Michigan Cmnty Bk1265 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20231.15003/31/2020 253,308.20 1,095954444BS3 1.150 830Citibank NA1123 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/11/20232.90004/11/2018 260,179.41 1,82617312QJ26 2.902 847Congressional Bank1189 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20232.50004/30/2019 261,355.43 1,45920726ABA5 2.502 847EnerBank USA1125 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/28/20232.95004/30/2018 255,462.17 1,82429278TAY6 2.952 854First National Bank1179 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/05/20232.80003/05/2019 263,203.64 1,52232117BCX4 2.802 864University of Iowa Comm. CU1134 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/15/20233.05005/14/2018 256,322.71 1,82791435LAG2 3.052 887Pittsfield Cooperative Bank1194 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/07/20232.50006/07/2019 258,764.78 1,461725404AB3 2.502 900Morton Community1173 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/20/20232.75003/20/2019 263,690.77 1,553619165JD6 2.753 900RCB Bank1144 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/20/20233.15006/20/2018 262,946.87 1,82674934YAH4 3.152 906American First CU1285 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/26/20230.35006/26/2020 248,841.15 1,09502616AAH2 0.350 929American National Bank1205 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/19/20232.00007/19/2019 259,377.00 1,46102772JBD1 2.001 930First National Bank of America1147 245,000.00 245,000.00 07/20/20233.15007/20/2018 263,516.52 1,82632110YLK9 3.152 941Bank of New England1151 249,000.00 249,000.00 07/31/20233.25007/31/2018 268,663.14 1,82606426KAN8 3.252 964Raymond James Bank1218 244,000.00 244,000.00 08/23/20231.95008/23/2019 255,255.19 1,46175472RAD3 1.951 1,001Triad Bank1262 248,000.00 248,000.00 09/29/20231.35003/30/2020 255,733.51 1,27889579NCD3 1.352 1,019Marlin Business Bank1155 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/17/20233.30010/17/2018 269,499.63 1,82657116ARV2 3.302 1,019Municipal Trust and Savings1160 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.20010/17/2018 265,547.71 1,826625925AR3 3.202 1,019UBS Bank USA1161 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.35010/17/2018 266,585.48 1,82690348JEJ5 3.352 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:16 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 65 Days to Maturity Page 5 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,021Jefferson Financial CU1154 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20233.35010/19/2018 266,616.59 1,826474067AQ8 3.352 1,048Commercial Bank1162 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/15/20233.40011/15/2018 270,798.83 1,82620143PDV9 3.402 1,061Numerica Credit Union1164 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/28/20233.55011/28/2018 272,173.92 1,82667054NAN3 3.552 1,084National Cooperative Bank, N.A1170 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20233.40012/21/2018 268,258.40 1,826635573AL2 3.402 1,092Bar Harbor Bank and Trust1172 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/29/20233.35012/31/2018 271,353.04 1,824066851WJ1 3.352 1,123Lakeside Bank1208 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/29/20242.00007/30/2019 261,567.64 1,64451210SQU4 2.003 1,137Rollstone B&T1251 245,000.00 245,000.00 02/12/20241.65002/12/2020 255,808.61 1,46177579ADF0 1.651 1,138Northwest Bank1181 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/13/20242.95002/13/2019 269,115.91 1,82666736ABP3 2.951 1,152Wells Fargo1174 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/27/20243.00002/27/2019 269,769.96 1,826949763XY7 3.001 1,182Texas Bank Financial1260 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/28/20241.10003/31/2020 251,770.02 1,458882213AB7 1.101 1,200The Jefferson Bank1272 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/15/20241.25004/15/2020 256,137.75 1,461472382AQ3 1.251 1,201Belmont Bank and Trust1270 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/16/20241.25004/16/2020 256,144.49 1,46108016PDQ9 1.251 1,201Pacific Western Bank1269 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/16/20241.30004/16/2020 253,448.20 1,46169506YRH4 1.301 1,211Main Street Bank1188 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/26/20242.60004/26/2019 267,432.75 1,82756065GAG3 2.603 1,230First Service Bank1231 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/15/20241.70011/15/2019 260,078.18 1,64333640VDD7 1.701 1,231JP Morgan Chase1185 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/16/20243.25005/16/2019 269,870.71 1,82748128HXU7 3.254 1,238Iowa State Bank1186 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/23/20242.40005/23/2019 262,873.35 1,82746256YAZ2 2.403 1,243Live Oak Bank1238 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/28/20241.80011/27/2019 261,058.06 1,644538036GV0 1.802 1,244Century Next Bank1184 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/29/20242.50005/29/2019 267,043.66 1,827156634AK3 2.503 1,253Plains Commerce Bank1195 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/07/20242.55006/07/2019 264,299.98 1,82772651LCL6 2.553 1,258Evansville Teachers Credit FCU1196 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/12/20242.60006/12/2019 268,057.00 1,827299547AQ2 2.603 1,265Legacy Bank1197 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/19/20242.40006/19/2019 266,432.35 1,827524661CB9 2.403 1,267Citizens State Bank1199 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/21/20242.40006/21/2019 266,461.33 1,827176688CP2 2.403 1,274Communitywide FCU1202 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/28/20242.25006/28/2019 265,251.82 1,82720416TAQ5 2.253 1,274Revere Bank1203 247,000.00 247,000.00 06/28/20242.30006/28/2019 264,607.23 1,827761402BY1 2.303 1,302Abacus Federal Savings1207 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/26/20241.95007/26/2019 262,885.21 1,82700257TBD7 1.952 1,306First Security Bank of WA1209 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/30/20242.00007/30/2019 263,378.51 1,82733625CCP2 2.002 1,307People's Bank1210 248,000.00 248,000.00 07/31/20242.00007/31/2019 263,325.48 1,827710571DS6 2.002 1,323Preferred Bank1213 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/16/20242.00008/16/2019 264,574.48 1,827740367HP5 2.002 1,330FirsTier Bank1216 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/23/20241.95008/23/2019 264,198.60 1,82733766LAJ7 1.952 1,330Washington Federal1215 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/23/20242.00008/23/2019 263,593.51 1,827938828BH2 2.002 1,337First State Bk DeQueen1222 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/30/20241.80008/30/2019 261,841.75 1,827336460CX6 1.802 1,337First Natl Bk of Syracuse1221 249,000.00 249,000.00 08/30/20241.85008/30/2019 263,357.74 1,827334342CD2 1.852 1,337Celtic Bank1220 248,000.00 248,000.00 08/30/20241.85008/30/2019 262,300.08 1,82715118RRH2 1.852 1,365BankWest Inc1227 248,000.00 248,000.00 09/27/20241.70009/27/2019 261,126.78 1,82706652CHB0 1.702 1,393Southern Bancorp Bk1286 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/25/20240.50006/26/2020 249,870.93 1,58284223QAN7 0.500 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:16 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 66 Days to Maturity Page 6 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,406Sauk Valley B&T Co1235 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/07/20241.70011/07/2019 261,379.86 1,827804375DL4 1.702 1,419Morgan Stanley Bank1237 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/20/20241.95011/20/2019 260,729.64 1,82761690UNX4 1.952 1,419Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1236 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/20/20241.90011/20/2019 260,249.78 1,82761760A3B3 1.902 1,459Bank Princeton1287 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/30/20240.50006/30/2020 249,818.52 1,644064520BG3 0.500 1,498United Community1249 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/07/20251.65002/07/2020 261,493.64 1,82790983WBT7 1.652 1,505First National Bank Michigan1250 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/14/20251.65002/14/2020 261,556.20 1,82732114VBT3 1.652 1,505Freedom Financial1248 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/14/20251.55002/14/2020 260,526.10 1,82735637RDC8 1.552 1,512American State1255 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/21/20251.60002/21/2020 261,101.34 1,827029728BC5 1.602 1,518Citadel FCU1252 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/27/20251.65002/27/2020 261,672.41 1,82717286TAG0 1.652 1,532Access Bank1256 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/13/20251.60003/13/2020 261,176.37 1,82600435JBH5 1.601 1,539Spring Bank1257 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/20/20251.50003/20/2020 260,183.11 1,826849430BF9 1.501 1,545Axos Bank1258 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/26/20251.65003/26/2020 261,815.83 1,82605465DAE8 1.651 1,547Alma Bank1267 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/28/20251.40003/30/2020 259,187.52 1,824020080BX4 1.399 1,550Commonwealth Business Bk1268 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.25003/31/2020 257,531.85 1,8262027506M2 1.251 1,550Nicolet Natl Bank1266 248,000.00 248,000.00 03/31/20251.40003/31/2020 259,122.26 1,826654062JZ2 1.401 1,558Capital One USA FDIC339541271 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/08/20251.60004/08/2020 258,139.37 1,82614042TDD6 1.601 1,578Firrst Natl Bk McGregor1274 248,000.00 248,000.00 04/28/20251.35004/28/2020 258,781.86 1,82632112UDR9 1.351 1,579First Freedom Bank1273 249,000.00 249,000.00 04/29/20251.20004/29/2020 258,205.70 1,82632027BAL1 1.201 1,580Flagstar1276248,000.00 248,000.00 04/30/20251.25004/30/2020 257,707.27 1,82633847E3A3 1.251 1,5921st Internet Bank1278 248,000.00 248,000.00 05/12/20251.00005/11/2020 254,966.65 1,82732056GDJ6 0.985 1,593Western State Bank1277 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/13/20251.00005/13/2020 251,881.19 1,82695960NKD8 1.001 1,635Chippewa Valley Bk1284 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/24/20250.60006/24/2020 250,581.31 1,826169894AS1 0.600 32,949,000.00 1,56034,394,918.9932,949,000.0033,114,967.74Subtotal and Average 901 2.163 Corporate Notes 215Apple Inc1079 500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 503,570.00 1,514037833CC2 1.900 401Proctor and Gamble1159 500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 511,575.00 1,210742718DY2 3.071 713Wal-Mart Stores, Inc1190 500,000.00 496,650.00 12/15/20222.35004/16/2019 520,630.00 1,339931142DU4 2.799 761Colgate-Palmolive1175 500,000.00 485,250.00 02/01/20231.95003/04/2019 517,400.00 1,43019416QEA4 2.751 949Microsoft Corporation1157 400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 417,240.00 1,758594918BQ6 3.222 2,341,260.00 1,4362,470,415.002,400,000.002,341,260.00Subtotal and Average 591 2.725 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 1US Bank1058 29.27 29.2707/01/2016 29.27 1SYS1058 0.000 29.27 129.2729.2729.27Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:16 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 67 Days to Maturity Page 7 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date CERBT - OPEB Trust 1CalPERS CERBT Plan1114 1,933,023.17 1,933,023.1707/01/2020 1,933,023.17 1SYS1114 0.000 1,933,023.17 11,933,023.171,933,023.171,790,658.93Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 PARS Pension Trust 1Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Serv1230 11,025,029.02 11,025,029.0207/01/2020 11,025,029.02 1SYS1230 0.000 11,025,029.02 111,025,029.0211,025,029.0210,866,593.65Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 682147,790,286.26 149,792,734.38 401 0.996152,242,521.08 149,603,821.74Total and Average Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 16:16 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 68 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund December 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 500,000.001288500,000.00 0.500FNMA 208.33 0.00 208.330.491101500,000.003135G05S8 0.00 495,950.001206500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.16 0.00 729.161.731101495,950.003135G0V75 0.00 500,000.001299500,000.00 0.600FNMA 66.67 0.00 66.670.5411010.003135GA7D7 0.00 992,100.0012331,000,000.00 1.375FNMA 1,145.83 0.00 1,145.831.360101992,100.003135G0W33 0.00 1,000,000.0012891,000,000.00 0.560FNMA 466.66 0.00 466.660.5491011,000,000.003136G4N74 0.00 499,750.001290500,000.00 0.520FNMA 216.67 0.00 216.670.510101499,750.003136G4M75 0.00 499,250.001292500,000.00 0.560FNMA 233.33 0.00 233.330.550101499,250.003135GA2Z3 0.00 499,250.001291500,000.00 0.420FNMA 175.00 0.00 175.000.413101499,250.003135G06E8 0.00 500,000.001300500,000.00 0.400FNMA 5.56 0.00 5.560.2031010.003135GAAW1 0.00 500,000.001301500,000.00 0.550FHLMC 7.64 0.00 7.640.2791010.003134GXGZ1 0.00 997,300.0012971,000,000.00 0.375FHLMC 250.00 0.00 250.000.3661010.003137EAEU9 0.00 1,000,000.0012791,000,000.00 0.625FHLMC 520.84 0.00 520.840.6131011,000,000.003134GVYG7 0.00 998,500.0012751,000,000.00 0.700FHLMC 583.33 0.00 583.330.688101998,500.003134GVLC0 0.00 999,217.3612471,000,000.00 1.400FFCB 1,166.67 0.00 1,166.671.375101999,217.363133EGWJ0 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 583.34 0.00 583.342.778101247,275.003133EJYL7 0.00 996,900.0012341,000,000.00 1.600FFCB 1,333.34 0.00 1,333.341.575101996,900.003133EK4X1 0.00 499,500.001198500,000.00 1.875FFCB 781.25 0.00 781.251.842101499,500.003133EKQP4 0.00 998,600.0012421,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.670101998,600.003133ELEA8 0.00 499,500.001212500,000.00 1.850FFCB 770.83 0.00 770.831.817101499,500.003133EKWV4 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.681101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 999,000.0012461,000,000.00 1.430FFCB 1,191.66 0.00 1,191.661.404101999,000.003133ELNE0 0.00 500,000.001282500,000.00 0.680FFCB 283.33 0.00 283.330.667101500,000.003133ELH80 0.00 499,400.001223500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.66 0.00 666.661.572101499,400.003133EKZK5 0.00 498,750.001224500,000.00 1.600FFCB 666.67 0.00 666.671.574101498,750.003133EKP75 0.00 499,850.001280500,000.00 0.500FFCB 208.34 0.00 208.340.491101499,850.003133ELH23 0.00 499,850.001281500,000.00 0.500FHLB 208.33 0.00 208.330.491101499,850.003130AJKW8 0.00 497,400.001298500,000.00 0.375FHLB 124.99 0.00 124.990.3671010.003130AKFA9 0.00 300,000.001283300,000.00 0.680FHLB 170.00 0.00 170.000.667101300,000.003130AJRP6 0.00 498,550.001177500,000.00 2.500FHLB 1,041.67 0.00 1,041.672.460101498,550.003130AFW94 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,140.89 0.00 2,140.891.2971011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:09 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.169 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 496,650.001192500,000.00 1.750USTR 749.31 0.00 749.311.776101496,650.00912828SV3 0.00 499,300.001217500,000.00 1.375USTR 585.50 0.00 585.501.381101499,300.00912828T26 0.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,740.99 0.00 4,740.991.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 989,687.5012411,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,277.47 0.00 1,277.471.520101989,687.50912828YV6 0.00 493,610.001193500,000.00 1.375USTR 585.51 0.00 585.511.397101493,610.00912828R77 0.00 489,687.501178500,000.00 1.875USTR 798.42 0.00 798.421.920101489,687.509128282W9 0.00 248,000.001174248,000.00 3.000WELLS 631.89 0.00 631.893.000101248,000.00949763XY7 0.00 1,098,081.6710571,098,081.67WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.01101763,093.004159282482 0.00 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 248,000.001169248,000.00 3.400MEDBA 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0058404DCX7 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 684.55 0.00 684.553.250101248,000.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 248,000.001173248,000.00 2.750MORTN 579.23 0.00 579.232.750101248,000.00619165JD6 0.00 245,000.001271245,000.00 1.600CAPONE 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.0014042TDD6 0.00 245,000.001176245,000.00 2.500ALLY 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0002007GHX4 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 305.75 0.00 305.751.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 53,275,840.36105553,275,840.36 0.540LAIF 28,518.44 0.00 28,518.440.59710156,275,840.3698-33-434 0.00 0.0012930.00BNY 2.07 0.00 2.071010.00SYS1293 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.83 0.00 645.831.542101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 479.01 0.00 479.012.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 366.91 0.00 366.911.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 468.19 0.00 468.192.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 478.59 0.00 478.592.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 436.97 0.00 436.972.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 436.98 0.00 436.982.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 457.78 0.00 457.782.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:09 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.170 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001236245,000.00 1.900MSPRIV 395.35 0.00 395.351.900101245,000.0061760A3B3 0.00 245,000.001237245,000.00 1.950MORGST 405.76 0.00 405.761.950101245,000.0061690UNX4 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 499.40 0.00 499.402.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 0.0011110.00 2.050FREECU 288.97 0.00 288.972.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 1,933,023.1711141,933,023.17CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001011,785,913.46SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 666.67 0.00 666.672.075101378,360.00594918BQ6 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 582.63 0.00 582.632.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 603.44 0.00 603.442.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 601.32 0.00 601.322.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 550.36 0.00 550.362.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 621.70 0.00 621.703.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001226245,000.00 1.800NYCMBK 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.00649447TC3 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 645.06 0.00 645.063.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 593.03 0.00 593.032.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 631.89 0.00 631.893.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 687.31 0.00 687.313.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 853,848.561153853,848.56 0.120CAMP 100.74 0.00 100.740.0421012,853,747.82SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 697.08 0.00 697.083.350101245,000.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 695.08 0.00 695.083.300101248,000.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 958.33 0.00 958.332.312101487,950.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 665.86 0.00 665.863.200101245,000.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 697.08 0.00 697.083.350101245,000.0090348JEJ5 0.00 248,000.001162248,000.00 3.400COMMBK 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0020143PDV9 0.00 248,000.001164248,000.00 3.550NMRCA 747.74 0.00 747.743.550101248,000.0067054NAN3 0.00 248,000.001165248,000.00 3.000FARMBU 631.89 0.00 631.893.000101248,000.00307660LC2 0.00 248,000.001166248,000.00 3.350REDRCK 705.61 0.00 705.613.350101248,000.0075701LAB3 0.00 245,000.001167245,000.00 3.200NEIGH 665.86 0.00 665.863.200101245,000.0064017AAQ7 0.00 245,000.001168245,000.00 3.1501STSRC 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0033646CKP8 0.00 245,000.001170245,000.00 3.400NLCOOP 707.48 0.00 707.483.400101245,000.00635573AL2 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:09 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.171 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 248,000.001171248,000.00 3.300MAINE 695.09 0.00 695.093.300101248,000.00560507AK1 0.00 248,000.001172248,000.00 3.350BARHAR 705.61 0.00 705.613.350101248,000.00066851WJ1 0.00 485,250.001175500,000.00 1.950COLGTE 812.50 0.00 812.501.971101485,250.0019416QEA4 0.00 248,000.001179248,000.00 2.8001STNBK 589.76 0.00 589.762.800101248,000.0032117BCX4 0.00 248,000.001180248,000.00 2.700VERUS 568.71 0.00 568.712.700101248,000.0092535LCD4 0.00 248,000.001181248,000.00 2.950NRTHWS 621.36 0.00 621.362.950101248,000.0066736ABP3 0.00 248,000.001184248,000.00 2.500CENTNX 526.57 0.00 526.572.500101248,000.00156634AK3 0.00 245,000.001185245,000.00 3.250JPMORG 676.27 0.00 676.273.250101245,000.0048128HXU7 0.00 245,000.001186245,000.00 2.400IOWAST 499.39 0.00 499.392.400101245,000.0046256YAZ2 0.00 248,000.001187248,000.00 2.400TSCOLA 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.0087266AAA1 0.00 248,000.001188248,000.00 2.600MAINST 547.64 0.00 547.642.600101248,000.0056065GAG3 0.00 248,000.001189248,000.00 2.500CONGRS 526.58 0.00 526.582.500101248,000.0020726ABA5 0.00 496,650.001190500,000.00 2.350WALMRT 979.16 0.00 979.162.321101496,650.00931142DU4 0.00 245,000.001194245,000.00 2.500PITTS 520.20 0.00 520.202.500101245,000.00725404AB3 0.00 245,000.001195245,000.00 2.550PLAINS 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0072651LCL6 0.00 248,000.001196248,000.00 2.600EVNSCU 547.64 0.00 547.642.600101248,000.00299547AQ2 0.00 248,000.001197248,000.00 2.400LEGCY 505.51 0.00 505.512.400101248,000.00524661CB9 0.00 248,000.001199248,000.00 2.400CTZNST 505.52 0.00 505.522.400101248,000.00176688CP2 0.00 248,000.001200248,000.00 2.300AMERCU 484.45 0.00 484.452.300101248,000.0003065AAL7 0.00 245,000.001201245,000.00 2.150STRLNG 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0085916VDC6 0.00 248,000.001202248,000.00 2.250COMMW 473.92 0.00 473.922.250101248,000.0020416TAQ5 0.00 247,000.001203247,000.00 2.300REVER 482.50 0.00 482.502.300101247,000.00761402BY1 0.00 248,000.001205248,000.00 2.000AMRNTL 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0002772JBD1 0.00 248,000.001207248,000.00 1.950ABACUS 410.73 0.00 410.731.950101248,000.0000257TBD7 0.00 248,000.001208248,000.00 2.000LKSIDE 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0051210SQU4 0.00 248,000.001209248,000.00 2.0001STSEC 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.0033625CCP2 0.00 248,000.001210248,000.00 2.000PEOPLE 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00710571DS6 0.00 248,000.001211248,000.00 2.100NFNITY 442.32 0.00 442.322.100101248,000.0045667EDY1 0.00 249,000.001213249,000.00 2.000PREFRD 422.96 0.00 422.962.000101249,000.00740367HP5 0.00 248,000.001214248,000.00 2.000UNTDCU 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00910160AH3 0.00 248,000.001215248,000.00 2.000WSHFED 421.26 0.00 421.262.000101248,000.00938828BH2 0.00 249,000.001216249,000.00 1.9501STIER 412.38 0.00 412.381.950101249,000.0033766LAJ7 0.00 244,000.001218244,000.00 1.950RAYJAM 404.10 0.00 404.101.950101244,000.0075472RAD3 0.00 245,000.001219245,000.00 1.900CITBNK 395.36 0.00 395.361.900101245,000.0012556LBA3 0.00 248,000.001220248,000.00 1.850CELTIC 389.67 0.00 389.671.850101248,000.0015118RRH2 0.00 249,000.001221249,000.00 1.8501STNBS 391.24 0.00 391.241.850101249,000.00334342CD2 0.00 248,000.001222248,000.00 1.8001STDQN 379.13 0.00 379.131.800101248,000.00336460CX6 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:09 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.172 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 5 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 245,000.001225245,000.00 1.600LUANA 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.00549104JN8 0.00 5,889,426.3412285,889,426.34BOTW 0.01 0.00 0.011012,628,359.40059731851 0.00 248,000.001227248,000.00 1.700BNKWST 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0006652CHB0 0.00 11,025,029.02123011,025,029.02PARS 0.01 0.00 0.0110110,861,312.47SYS1230 0.00 248,000.001231248,000.00 1.7001STSER 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0033640VDD7 0.00 248,000.001235248,000.00 1.700SAUKVL 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.00804375DL4 0.00 248,000.001238248,000.00 1.800LIVEOK 379.13 0.00 379.131.800101248,000.00538036GV0 0.00 248,000.001239248,000.00 1.900KERNCU 400.20 0.00 400.201.900101248,000.0049228XAK6 0.00 248,000.001240248,000.00 1.850SF FCU 389.67 0.00 389.671.850101248,000.0079772FAC0 0.00 248,000.001244248,000.00 1.900WFNBW 400.20 0.00 400.201.900101248,000.00949495AT2 0.00 248,000.001248248,000.00 1.550FRDMFI 326.48 0.00 326.481.550101248,000.0035637RDC8 0.00 248,000.001249248,000.00 1.650UNTDCM 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0090983WBT7 0.00 248,000.001250248,000.00 1.6501STNMI 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0032114VBT3 0.00 245,000.001251245,000.00 1.650RLLSTN 343.34 0.00 343.341.650101245,000.0077579ADF0 0.00 248,000.001252248,000.00 1.650CITADL 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0017286TAG0 0.00 245,000.001253245,000.00 1.600SYNOVS 332.93 0.00 332.931.600101245,000.0087164DRD4 0.00 248,000.001254248,000.00 1.600SERVIS 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.0081768PAF3 0.00 248,000.001255248,000.00 1.600AMERST 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.00029728BC5 0.00 248,000.001256248,000.00 1.600ACCSS 337.01 0.00 337.011.600101248,000.0000435JBH5 0.00 248,000.001257248,000.00 1.500SPRING 315.94 0.00 315.941.500101248,000.00849430BF9 0.00 248,000.001258248,000.00 1.650AXOS 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.0005465DAE8 0.00 245,000.001259245,000.00 1.200CADNCE 249.70 0.00 249.701.200101245,000.0012738RFX7 0.00 245,000.001260245,000.00 1.100TEXAS 228.89 0.00 228.891.100101245,000.00882213AB7 0.00 248,000.001261248,000.00 1.100SNTCLR 231.69 0.00 231.691.100101248,000.0006424KBC3 0.00 248,000.001262248,000.00 1.350TRIAD 284.35 0.00 284.351.350101248,000.0089579NCD3 0.00 248,000.001263248,000.00 1.150NRTHSR 242.22 0.00 242.221.150101248,000.0066704MEQ0 0.00 248,000.001264248,000.00 1.300BELLCO 273.82 0.00 273.821.300101248,000.0007833EAD9 0.00 248,000.001265248,000.00 1.150WESTMI 242.22 0.00 242.221.150101248,000.00954444BS3 0.00 248,000.001266248,000.00 1.400NCOLET 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.00654062JZ2 0.00 248,000.001267248,000.00 1.400ALMABK 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.00020080BX4 0.00 248,000.001268248,000.00 1.250CMWBUS 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.002027506M2 0.00 245,000.001269245,000.00 1.300PACWST 270.51 0.00 270.511.300101245,000.0069506YRH4 0.00 248,000.001270248,000.00 1.250BELB&T 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.0008016PDQ9 0.00 248,000.001272248,000.00 1.250THEJEF 263.28 0.00 263.281.250101248,000.00472382AQ3 0.00 249,000.001273249,000.00 1.2001STFDM 253.77 0.00 253.771.200101249,000.0032027BAL1 0.00 248,000.001274248,000.00 1.3501STMCG 284.35 0.00 284.351.350101248,000.0032112UDR9 0.00 248,000.001276248,000.00 1.250FLGSTR 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.0033847E3A3 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:09 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.173 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 6 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 245,000.001277245,000.00 1.000WSTRNS 208.08 0.00 208.081.000101245,000.0095960NKD8 0.00 248,000.001278248,000.00 1.0001STINT 210.63 0.00 210.631.000101248,000.0032056GDJ6 0.00 248,000.001284248,000.00 0.600CHIPVA 126.38 0.00 126.380.600101248,000.00169894AS1 0.00 248,000.001285248,000.00 0.350AMR1ST 73.72 0.00 73.720.350101248,000.0002616AAH2 0.00 248,000.001286248,000.00 0.500STHRNB 105.32 0.00 105.320.500101248,000.0084223QAN7 0.00 248,000.001287248,000.00 0.500BKPRNC 105.32 0.00 105.320.500101248,000.00064520BG3 0.00 490,015.121294490,015.12DREYF 0.00 0.00 0.00101246,860.66X9USDDTP3 0.00 138,967,564.24Subtotal 138,778,651.60 1.032 121,099.020.00121,099.02136,878,814.53 0.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 29.27105829.27USBANK 0.01 0.00 0.010.40223129.27SYS1058 0.00 29.27Subtotal 29.27 0.402 0.010.000.0129.27 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 279,993.581062279,993.58LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241277,123.88SYS1062 0.00 279,993.58Subtotal 279,993.58 0.000.000.00277,123.88 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 10,545,147.29111310,545,147.29 0.540LAIF 6,651.46 0.00 6,651.460.47324916,545,147.2925-33-005 0.00 10,545,147.29Subtotal 10,545,147.29 0.473 6,651.460.006,651.4616,545,147.29 0.00 149,792,734.38Total 149,603,821.74 0.970 127,750.490.00127,750.49153,701,114.97 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/18/2021 - 15:09 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.174 City of La Quinta -City of La Quinta Purchases Report Sorted by Security Type - Fund October 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 Original Par Value Ending Book Value Sec. TypeFund Maturity YTM Accrued Interest at PurchasePayment Periods DateCUSIPInvestment #Issuer Purchase Date Principal Purchased Rate at Purchase Federal Agency Coupon Securities 500,000.00 0.560 11/17/2025 499,250.00499,250.0011/17/2020 0.59005/17 - 11/17FNMA12923135GA2Z3FAC101 500,000.00 0.420 11/18/2024 499,250.00499,250.0011/18/2020 0.45805/18 - 11/18FNMA12913135G06E8FAC101 500,000.00 0.375 12/12/2025 497,400.00497,400.00 Received12/07/2020 0.48006/12 - 12/12FHLB12983130AKFA9FAC101 1,000,000.00 0.375 07/21/2025 997,300.00997,300.00 Received12/07/2020 0.43401/21 - 07/21FHLMC12973137EAEU9FAC101 500,000.00 0.600 12/23/2025 500,000.00500,000.0012/23/2020 0.60006/23 - 12/23FNMA12993135GA7D7FAC101 500,000.00 0.550 12/30/2025 500,000.00500,000.0012/30/2020 0.55006/30 - 12/30FHLMC13013134GXGZ1FAC101 500,000.00 0.400 12/30/2024 500,000.00500,000.0012/30/2020 0.40006/30 - 12/30FNMA13003135GAAW1FAC101 Subtotal 3,993,200.003,993,200.00 0.004,000,000.00 3,993,200.00Total Purchases 4,000,000.00 0.00 3,993,200.00 Received = Accrued Interest at Purchase was received by report ending date. Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 11:57 PU (PRF_PU) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.175 City of La Quinta -City of La Quinta Maturity Report Sorted by Maturity Date Amounts due during October 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 Rate at MaturityPar Value Sec. TypeFund Maturity Date Maturity ProceedsInterest Income Net CUSIP Investment #Issuer Purchase Date Book Value at Maturity 245,000.00 2.700 245,018.1218.1204/18/20181STTCH112433715LBJ8MC110110/19/2020 18.12245,000.00 245,000.00 1.800 246,860.661,860.6606/21/2017RICHMN1081319267GC8MC110111/23/2020 1,860.66245,000.00 245,000.00 2.050 247,518.132,518.1312/22/2017FREECU111135638BAA9MC110112/22/2020 2,518.13245,000.00 739,396.91Total Maturities 735,000.00 4,396.91735,000.00 4,396.91 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/12/2021 - 12:07 MA (PRF_MA) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.176 US Treasury Rates https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yieldYear&year=2020 77 78 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 2020 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file revenue and expenditure report dated December 31, 2020. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The report summarizes the City’s period and year-to-date (YTD) revenues and expenditures for December 2020 (Attachment 1). •These reports are also reviewed by the Financial Advisory Commission. FISCAL IMPACT – None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is a summary of the column headers used on the Revenue and Expenditure Summary Reports: Original Total Budget – represents revenue and expenditure budgets the Council adopted in June 2020 for fiscal year 2020/21. Current Total Budget – represents original adopted budgets plus any Council approved budget amendments from throughout the year. The 2019/20 operating and Capital Improvement Project carryovers to 2020/21 have been added to the current budget. Period Activity – represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid in the reporting month. Fiscal Activity – represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid YTD. Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) - represents the dollar difference between YTD collections/expenditures and the current budgeted amount. Percent Used – represents the percentage activity as compared to budget YTD. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 79 The revenue report includes revenues and transfers into funds from other funds (income items). Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City’s cash flow reserve. The expenditure report includes expenditures and transfers out to other funds. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Approved by: Karla Romero, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Revenue and Expenditure Report for December 31, 2020 MTD YTD YTD Percent of Budget General Fund 5,542,691$ 15,897,744$ 28.88% All Funds 14,444,359$ 36,569,345$ 21.49% MTD YTD YTD Percent of Budget General Fund 3,435,336$ 13,977,408$ 21.28% Payroll - General Fund 840,938$ 4,875,441$ 46.68% All Funds 17,062,338$ 54,459,530$ 29.32% December Expenditures December Revenues General Fund Non-General Fund Property Tax 2,044,662$ Transfers In - Capital Improvement (CIP) Fund(1)5,065,228$ Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax 1,084,009$ Active Transportation Grant - Complete Streets 1,184,130$ Measure G 1,035,956$ Technology Support Internal Service Fund (2)423,875$ Sales Tax 925,973$ County Government Revenue -Library/Museum 279,517$ Document Transfer Tax 203,428$ SilverRock Greens Fees 276,320$ General Fund Non-General Fund Transfers Out to CIP 1,452,579$ Housing Fund-Land Acquisition(4)5,498,796$ Liability Insurance & Claims (3)115,000$ CIP-Construction(5)2,811,325$ Park Equipment Maintenance (3) 100,000$ Transfers Out - Project Area 1 Capital Fund to CIP 2,070,189$ Marketing and Tourism Promotions 42,889$ Transfers Out - Parks & Rec DIF Fund to CIP 801,436$ Information Technology(3)41,650$ Transfers Out - Transportation DIF Fund to CIP 343,055$ (5)CIP Construction: Village Complete Streets, SilverRock event space, SilverRock Way, Washington Street pavement rehabilitation, and north LaQuinta landscape project. (3)These charges in the General Fund represent quarterly contributions to the Internal Service Funds. (4)Housing Fund Land Acquisition: Payment to the State of California Condemnation Fund and Four Seasons Escrow in relation to Dune Palms Mobile Estates Top Five Revenue/Income Sources for December Top Five Expenditures/Outlays for December (1)Transfers in to the Capital Improvement Fund are from General Fund, Gas Tax, Measure A, Parks & Recreation Developer Impact Fees (DIF), Transportation DIF, and Project Area 1 Capital Improvement Fund sources. (2)Internal Service Funds are used to account for activities involved in rendering services to departments within the City; quarterly journal entries move revenue into these funds. 80 2/18/2021 Page 1 of 3 Revenue Summary Fiscal Activity Variance Favorable (Unfavorable)Fund Period Activity Current Total Budget Original Total Budget Percent Used 101 - GENERAL FUND 15,897,7445,542,69150,726,100 55,040,534 -39,142,790 28.88 % 201 - GAS TAX FUND 795,523220,1881,778,400 1,791,800 -996,277 44.40 % 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 268,312279,6352,808,500 2,807,200 -2,538,888 9.56 % 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEASURE G)-1,924010,000 10,000 -11,924 19.24 % 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND -200141,900 147,472 -147,492 0.01 % 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 81,43616,667101,000 101,000 -19,564 80.63 % 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 895,96601,877,000 1,877,000 -981,035 47.73 % 220 - QUIMBY FUND -2,481080,000 80,000 -82,481 3.10 % 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 7,440076,000 76,000 -68,560 9.79 % 223 - MEASURE A FUND 566,423136,6191,319,000 1,519,000 -952,577 37.29 % 224 - TUMF FUND -376000 -376 0.00 % 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND -310200200 -231 15.38 % 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG)-11012,100 19,700 -19,711 0.06 % 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAMS (SHSP)3,19405,000 5,000 -1,806 63.88 % 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 7,7211,34618,200 18,200 -10,479 42.42 % 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF -17,321020,539,264 20,539,264 -20,556,585 0.08 % 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND -37053,000 53,000 -53,037 0.07 % 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN -298013,505 13,505 -13,803 2.21 % 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,389,44424,113513,300 1,715,756 -326,312 80.98 % 243 - RDA LOW-MOD HOUSING FUND -4,181035,000 35,000 -39,181 11.95 % 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple)00060,000 -60,000 0.00 % 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND -6,543040,000 649,100 -655,643 1.01 % 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2016)58,44223,994200,000 200,000 -141,558 29.22 % 250 - TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 224,86420,045380,000 380,000 -155,136 59.17 % 251 - PARKS & REC DIF FUND 83,31010,530304,000 304,000 -220,690 27.40 % 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 51,3646,150110,000 110,000 -58,636 46.69 % 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 15,4561,98545,000 45,000 -29,544 34.35 % 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL CENTERS DIF 31,3194,78016,500 16,500 14,819 189.81 % 255 - STREET FACILITY DIF FUND 4,033017,000 2,000 2,033 201.64 % 256 - PARK FACILITY DIF FUND 31107,100 500 -189 62.19 % 257 - FIRE PROTECTION DIF 17,3371,84555,500 55,500 -38,163 31.24 % 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 103,1914,779111,000 121,000 -17,809 85.28 % 275 - LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER 1,92502,600 2,600 -675 74.02 % 299 - INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND 978,232209,51000 978,232 0.00 % 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE 001,100 1,100 -1,100 0.00 % 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 10,500,9196,299,94219,058,300 73,855,948 -63,355,029 14.22 % 405 - SA PA 1 CAPITAL IMPRV FUND -9,8880100,000 100,000 -109,888 9.89 % 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 430,439217,875902,500 902,500 -472,061 47.69 % 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 881,359451,3801,721,500 1,747,300 -865,941 50.44 % 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 94,208100,000245,000 245,000 -150,792 38.45 % 504 - INSURANCE FUND 467,717231,875928,500 928,500 -460,783 50.37 % 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 1,728,375322,3373,882,100 3,882,100 -2,153,725 44.52 % 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE -83104,500 4,500 -5,331 18.46 % 760 - SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 4,83706,500 6,500 -1,663 74.42 % 761 - CERBT OPEB TRUST 218,959147,50560,000 75,000 143,959 291.94 % 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 803,489168,567300,000 600,000 203,489 133.91 % Report Total:14,444,359 36,569,345108,606,169 170,144,279 -133,574,934 21.49 % For Fiscal: 2020/21 Period Ending: 12/31/2020 Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), published annually in December, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. ATTACHMENT 1 81 For Fiscal: 2020/21 Period Ending: 12/31/2020 2/18/2021 Page 2 of 3 Expenditure Summary Fiscal Activity Variance Favorable (Unfavorable)Fund Period Activity Current Total Budget Original Total Budget Percent Used 101 - GENERAL FUND 13,977,4083,435,33647,911,600 65,689,997 51,712,589 21.28 % 201 - GAS TAX FUND 576,353244,6671,775,300 2,288,769 1,712,416 25.18 % 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 552,398317,2901,715,100 2,318,100 1,765,702 23.83 % 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEASURE G)7,7166,5751,000,000 1,372,296 1,364,580 0.56 % 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 00141,900 321,339 321,339 0.00 % 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 6,8180100,000 100,000 93,182 6.82 % 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 766,638151,2741,876,600 2,126,600 1,359,962 36.05 % 220 - QUIMBY FUND 491,27512,72802,781,625 2,290,350 17.66 % 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 1,050850100,000 250,000 248,950 0.42 % 223 - MEASURE A FUND 185,090177,6351,263,900 2,455,084 2,269,994 7.54 % 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 00022,618 22,618 0.00 % 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG)19,6299,87912,000 19,600 -29 100.15 % 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAMS (SHSP)005,000 5,000 5,000 0.00 % 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 004,400 4,400 4,400 0.00 % 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 13,302,2912168,405,468 8,405,468 -4,896,823 158.26 % 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 14,80342542,200 48,900 34,097 30.27 % 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 1,950013,505 13,505 11,555 14.44 % 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 594,85684,630822,300 1,143,062 548,206 52.04 % 243 - RDA LOW-MOD HOUSING FUND 00250,000 250,000 250,000 0.00 % 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple)14,1427,645060,000 45,858 23.57 % 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 636,35387,08310,000 1,630,500 994,147 39.03 % 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2016)6,116,7965,498,7966,185,000 6,185,000 68,204 98.90 % 250 - TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 743,056343,0551,293,000 1,957,670 1,214,614 37.96 % 251 - PARKS & REC DIF FUND 959,713801,4360959,713 0 100.00 % 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 0030,000 30,000 30,000 0.00 % 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL CENTERS DIF 000101,639 101,639 0.00 % 256 - PARK FACILITY DIF FUND 0005,600 5,600 0.00 % 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 38,66314,330110,000 725,700 687,037 5.33 % 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE 001,100 1,100 1,100 0.00 % 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 9,442,0882,975,88519,058,300 70,321,842 60,879,755 13.43 % 405 - SA PA 1 CAPITAL IMPRV FUND 2,647,9392,070,18905,539,155 2,891,216 47.80 % 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 181,25537,818902,500 1,144,464 963,209 15.84 % 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 665,30295,5521,684,200 1,924,200 1,258,898 34.58 % 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 85,12681,721595,000 682,986 597,860 12.46 % 504 - INSURANCE FUND 791,484282,832827,500 904,500 113,016 87.51 % 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 1,597,533319,2453,881,500 3,881,500 2,283,967 41.16 % 760 - SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 12,833012,850 12,850 17 99.87 % 761 - CERBT OPEB TRUST 7763951,500 1,500 724 51.74 % 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 28,1984,85052,000 52,000 23,802 54.23 % Report Total:17,062,338 54,459,530100,083,723 185,738,282 131,278,751 29.32 % Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), published annually in December, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. 82 Fund #Name Notes 101 General Fund The primary fund of the City used to account for all revenue and expenditures of the City; a broad range of municipal activities are provided through this fund. 201 Gas Tax Fund Gasoline sales tax allocations received from the State which are restricted to street-related expenditures. 202 Library and Museum Fund Revenues from property taxes and related expenditures for library and museum services. 203 Public Safety Fund General Fund Measure G sales tax revenue set aside for public safety expenditures. 210 Federal Assistance Fund Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) received from the federal government and the expenditures of those resources. 212 SLESF (COPS) Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds (SLESF) received from the State for law enforcement activities. Also known as Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS). 215 Lighting & Landscaping Fund Special assessments levied on real property for city-wide lighting and landscape maintenance/improvements and the expenditures of those resources. 220 Quimby Fund Developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. 221 AB939 Fund/Cal Recycle Franchise fees collected from the city waste hauler that are used to reduce waste sent to landfills through recycling efforts. Assembly Bill (AB) 939. 223 Measure A Fund County sales tax allocations which are restricted to street-related expenditures. 224 TUMF Fund Developer-paid Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) utilized for traffic projects in Riverside County. 225 Infrastructure Fund Developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City’s infrastructure as defined by Resolution 226 Emergency Mgmt. Performance Grant (EMPG)Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 227 State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP)Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 230 CASP Fund, AB1379 / SB1186 Certified Access Specialist (CASp) program fees for ADA Accessibility Improvements; derived from Business License renewals. Assembly Bill (AB) 1379 and Senate Bill (SB) 1186. 231 Successor Agency PA 1 RORF Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund (RORF) for Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) taxes received for debt service payments on recognized obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). 235 SO Coast Air Quality Fund (AB2766, PM10)Contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Uses are limited to the reduction and control of airborne pollutants. Assembly Bill (AB) 2766. 237 Successor Agency PA 1 Admin Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 for administration of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) associated with the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). 241 Housing Authority Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. 243 RDA Low-Moderate Housing Fund Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. Accounts for RDA loan repayments (20% for Housing) and housing programs,. 244 Housing Grants Activites related Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) and SB2 grants for housing planning and development. 247 Economic Development Fund Proceeds from sale of City-owned land; transferred from General Fund for future economic development. 249 SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond Fund Successor Agency (SA) low/moderate housing fund; 2011 bonds refinanced in 2016. 250 Transportation DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - transportation related. 251 Parks & Rec. DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks and recreation. 252 Civic Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - Civic Center. 253 Library Development DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - library. 254 Community Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - community center. 255 Street Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - streets. 256 Park Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks. 257 Fire Protection DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - fire protection. 270 Art In Public Places Fund Developer fees collected in lieu of art placement; utilized for acquisition, installation and maintenance of public artworks. 275 LQ Public Safety Officer Fund Annual transfer in from General Fund; distributed to public safety officers disabled or killed in the line of duty. 299 Interest Allocation Fund Interest earned on investments. 310 LQ Finance Authority Debt Service Fund Accounted for the debt service the Financing Authority’s outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. This bond was fully paid in October 2018. 401 Capital Improvement Program Fund Planning, design, and construction of various capital projects throughout the City. 405 SA PA 1 Capital Improvement Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 bond proceeds restricted by the bond indenture covenants. Used for SilverRock infrastructure improvements. 501 Equipment Replacement Fund Internal Service Fund for vehicles, heavy equipment, and related facilities. 502 Information Technology Fund Internal Service Fund for computer hardware and software and phone systems. 503 Park Equipment & Facility Fund Internal Service Fund for park equipment and facilities. 504 Insurance Fund Internal Service Fund for city-wide insurance coverages. 601 SilverRock Resort Fund Enterprise Fund for activities of the city-owned golf course. 602 SilverRock Golf Reserve Fund Enterprise Fund for golf course reserves for capital improvements. 760 Supplemental Pension Plan (PARS Account)Supplemental pension savings plan for excess retiree benefits to general employees of the City. 761 Other Post Benefit Obligation Trust (OPEB)For retiree medical benefits and unfunded liabilities. 762 Pension Trust Benefit (PARS Account)For all pension-related benefits and unfunded liabilities. Fund Descriptions Page 3 of 3 83 84 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO REAFFIRM ADOPTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152, AUTHORIZE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TO CONTINUE TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS, AND INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE COUNTY HARMLESS FOR LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON CITY PARCELS RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution to reaffirm adoption of the annual assessment for County Service Area 152 for Fiscal Year 2021/22, authorize Riverside County to continue to levy assessments, and indemnify and hold the County harmless for levying assessments on City parcels. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The City has an agreement with Riverside County (County) wherein the County assesses properties within the City for the maintenance and operations of street sweeping, flood control, retention basins, and other drainage facilities within the City to improve overall storm water quality. •These activities are required under the Clean Water Act and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program. •The Council must annually adopt a resolution authorizing the County to assess City parcels and hold the County harmless for levying the assessments. •The per parcel assessment rate will remain unchanged from its original 1997 rate of $9.99 per Benefit Assessment Unit for the Fiscal Year 2021/22. FISCAL IMPACT County Service Area (CSA) 152 assessments generate approximately $300,000 per year. These funds are held by the County and are designated for expenditures related to storm water pollution mitigation under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The City may request reimbursement for qualifying expenditures, such as retention basin maintenance, and the revenue is recognized in General Fund (Account No. 101- 0000-43633, CSA 152 Assessments). CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 85 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 1991, the County enacted CSA 152 to provide funding for local jurisdictions to maintain flood control and storm drain facilities. In 1994, the City joined CSA 152, and in 1997 the Council approved the Benefit Assessment Unit rate of $9.99. The City/County Agreement is available for review in the Public Works Department. Staff recommends the City’s continued participation in CSA 152 and to authorize the County to levy and collect these assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer 86 RESOLUTION NO. 2021 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS AND REAFFIRMING THE ESTABLISHMENT AND SETTING OF RATES FOR THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 TO FUND THE CITY’S STREET SWEEPING PROGRAM AND OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE CITY’S DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Service Area 152 (CSA 152) was created under the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 54702, et seq.), which authorized local agencies to impose benefit assessments to finance the maintenance and operation costs of flood control and drainage systems, based on the proportionate storm water runoff from each parcel; and WHEREAS, under the federally-mandated but unfunded National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program, the City is required to have a valid permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board to discharge water runoff from properties within the boundaries of the City; and WHEREAS, street sweeping is a pro-active method of ensuring pro- active maintenance from street runoff into the flood control and drainage systems of the City; and WHEREAS, the City is a co-permittee of Permit No. CAS-617002 with the Coachella Valley Water District, County of Riverside and the incorporated cities therein; and WHEREAS, the City, by its Resolution No. 97-39, adopted on May 20, 1997, authorized Riverside County to levy and establish a Benefit Assessment Unit rate for the 1997-1998 Fiscal Year CSA 152 assessments; and WHEREAS, the City by its Resolution No. 97-39, adopted on May 20, 1997, agreed to indemnify and hold the County harmless for levying Assessments on the City parcels under CSA 152; and WHEREAS, the City uses revenues from CSA 152 assessments solely for the purpose of maintaining and operating the City’s flood control and drainage system to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit and to provide street sweeping within the City of La Quinta; and 87 Resolution No. 2021-XXX CSA 152 Adopted: March 2, 2021 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, Proposition 218, adopted by voters on November 6, 1996, established new procedures and approval requirements for all existing assessments, unless the assessment is exempt from the new requirements; and WHEREAS, certain assessments that existed on November 6, 1996, are specifically exempt from the Proposition 218 procedures and approval requirements, including assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs and maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds the foregoing recitals to be true and correct. Section 2. The City Council finds and declares that the City’s CSA 152 charges are assessments within the definition of California Constitution Article XIIID, Section 2(b), in that they confer special benefits upon each parcel of property subject to the assessments. Section 3. The City Council finds and declares that pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 5(a), the City’s CSA 152 assessments are exempt from the new procedures and approval requirements of Article XIIID, Section 4, because the City’s CSA 152 assessments existed before November 6, 1996, and the assessments are imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs and maintenance and operation expenses for street sweeping, flood control, and drainage systems in the City. Section 4. The City Council hereby reaffirms its adoption of the annual assessment for CSA 152 and hereby determines that the annual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2021/2022 for CSA 152 is to be set at nine dollars and ninety-nine cents ($9.99) per Benefit Assessment Unit. The method of computation has not been changed nor has the rate of assessment been increased since August 6, 1996. Section 5. The City Council hereby authorizes the County of Riverside to levy assessments under CSA 152 for the benefit of the City. The City agrees that it shall indemnify, defend and hold County and members of its Board, and its officers, employees and agents harmless from (1) any and all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever and (2) any and all liability of any kind or nature whatsoever that may arise out of or be 88 Resolution No. 2021-XXX CSA 152 Adopted: March 2, 2021 Page 3 of 3 caused by, or be attributable to the imposition, collection, or allocation of any tax (special or general), assessment fees or charges, and/or any other revenue generated through City’s application of reliance on or use of County Service Area 152. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 2nd day of March 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: _________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: ____________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ WILLIAM H. IRHKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 89 90 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED FEBRUARY 12 AND 19, 2021 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated February 12 and 19, 2021. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City 7,976,683.91$ Successor Agency of RDA 6,480.00$ Housing Authority 18,872.33$ 8,002,036.24$ BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for February 12 and 19, 2021. Warrants Issued: 203975-204050 2,692,043.96$ 204051-204053 6,397.01$ 204054-204123 674,666.24$ Wire Transfers 4,369,311.24$ Payroll Tax Transfers 71,414.25$ Payroll Direct Deposit 188,203.54$ 8,002,036.24$ CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 91 The most significant expenditures on the demand registers are: Account Name Amount Burrtec Waste Svcs Due To Waste Mgmt 2,247,642.21$ FY 20/21 Property Tax Payment Jones Bros Cnstr Construction 371,409.62$ SRR Way St Improvements Urban Habitat Construction 129,892.74$ Landscape Improv Rancho Ocotillo 225 VTL Palizada LLC Developer Deposits 40,500.00$ Dust Control Cash Deposit Refund Rutan & Tucker Attorney 35,800.36$ Dec Contract Legal Services PurposeVendor Wire Transfers: Fourteen transfers totaled $4,369,311.24. Of this amount, $4,038,375 was for bond debt service and $161,221 was for CalPERS. (See Attachment 2 for a full listing). Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions as well as total holdings are reported quarterly in the Treasurer’s Report. Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Settle Date Coupon Rate Purchase TIAA FSB CD 245,000$ 2/12/21 0.500% ALTERNATIVES Council may approve, partially approve, or reject the demand registers. Prepared by: Jesse Batres, Account Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Attachments:1. Demand Registers 2.Wire Transfers 92 2/18/2021 4:34:57 PM Page 1 of 6 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT02687 - JB 02/12/21 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND 72.00United Way DeductionsCONTRIBUTION204044UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 101-0000-20981 9,379.00Contract Traffic Engineer12/2020 ON CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING …204049WILLDAN 101-7006-60144 280.77Marketing & Tourism Promoti…02/04/21 - SAFETY STYLUS PENS FOR STAFF204017PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-3007-60461 214.68Uniforms01/24/21 - CODE UNIFORMS203997GALLS LLC 101-6004-60690 8.39Uniforms01/15/21 - CODE UNIFORM SUPPLIES203997GALLS LLC 101-6004-60690 40,500.00Developer Deposits02/01/21 - DUST CONTROL CASH DEP REF…203975255 VTL PALIZADA LLC 101-0000-22810 2,510,589.81Due to Waste Management12/31/20 - FY20/21 PROPERY TAX PAYME…203984BURRTEC WASTE & RECYCLING…101-0000-20307 -249,800.22Franchise Taxes - Burrtec12/31/20 - FY20/21 PROPERY TAX PAYME…203984BURRTEC WASTE & RECYCLING…101-0000-41505 20.00Sales Taxes Payable4TH QTR SALES AND USE TAXES204026SILVERROCK RESORT 101-0000-20304 1,681.80Vision Insurance Pay02/2021 - VSP VIA THE STANDARD204030STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20945 1,673.22Vision Insurance Pay01/2021 - VSP VIA THE STANDARD204030STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20945 1,649.42Vision Insurance Pay12/2020 - VSP VIA THE STANDARD204030STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20945 89.99Cable - Utilities01/29-02/08/21 - FS #32 INTERNET (6491)204040TIME WARNER CABLE 101-2002-61400 200.10Materials/Supplies02/04/21 - 1 GALLON HAND SANITIZER203989COPPERTRAIN SOLUTIONS 101-3005-60431 2,100.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/27-02/23/21 - AIRPORT DIGITAL BILLB…204038THE LAMAR COMPANIES 101-3007-60461 6.39Office Supplies09/17/20 - NOTE PADS204012OFFICE DEPOT 101-6004-60400 -125.01Special Enforcement/City Spec…07/19/19 - RECLASS TO 101-2001-71031203999GOLF CARS OF THE DESERT 101-2001-60165 125.01Vehicles07/19/19 - RECLASS FROM 101-2001-601…203999GOLF CARS OF THE DESERT 101-2001-71031 603.35Tools/Equipment01/28/21 - CHAINSAW204010MOWERS PLUS INC 101-7003-60432 84.36Printing01/27/21 - 2020 W2 FORMS204012OFFICE DEPOT 101-1006-60410 116.00Printing01/29/21 - 2020 W2 FORMS204012OFFICE DEPOT 101-1006-60410 295.00Lot Cleaning/Gravel Program12/22/20 - WEED ABATEMENT LOT CLEA…204011MOYA, DANIEL 101-6004-60120 7,676.90Dental Insurance Pay12/2020 - DENTAL INSURANCE203987CIGNA HEALTH CARE 101-0000-20943 7,842.83Dental Insurance Pay01/2021 - DENTAL INSURANCE203987CIGNA HEALTH CARE 101-0000-20943 8,001.37Dental Insurance Pay02/2021 - DENTAL INSURANCE203987CIGNA HEALTH CARE 101-0000-20943 6,870.83Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/2021 - ADVERTISING CONTRACT204036THE CHAMBER 101-3007-60461 6,870.83Marketing & Tourism Promoti…02/2021 - ADVERTISING CONTRACT204036THE CHAMBER 101-3007-60461 1,500.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…02/08/21 - COMMUNITY WORKSHOP EVE…204036THE CHAMBER 101-3007-60461 69.58Postage01/22/21 - OVERNIGHT MAIL203994FEDEX 101-1007-60470 230.00LQ Police Volunteers10/26/20 - ANNUAL SERVICE FOR COP GO…203999GOLF CARS OF THE DESERT 101-2001-60109 769.00Blood/Alcohol Testing08/21-09/18/20 - BLOOD TESTS203982BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 101-2001-60174 402.88Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/24-01/31/21 - COMMUNITY OUTREAC…203978ALPHA MEDIA LLC 101-3007-60461 238.10Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/24-01/31/21 COMMUNITY OUTREACH…203978ALPHA MEDIA LLC 101-3007-60461 210.00Blood/Alcohol Testing12/2020 - BLOOD/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS203990DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 101-2001-60174 1,117.39Temporary Agency Services11/20/20 - HUB TEMP SERVICES M.GONZ…204023ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 101-6006-60125 860.43Temporary Agency Services12/04/20 - TEMP SERVICES R.NUNO203976ACCOUNTEMPS 101-6006-60125 1,144.36Temporary Agency Services12/04/20 -HUB TEMP SERVICES M.GONZA…204023ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 101-6006-60125 712.08Temporary Agency Services12/11/20 - TEMP SERVICES R.NUNO203976ACCOUNTEMPS 101-6006-60125 667.58Temporary Agency Services12/18/20 - TEMPSERVICES R.NUNO203976ACCOUNTEMPS 101-6006-60125 858.27Temporary Agency Services12/25/20 - HUB TEMP SERVICES M.GONZ…204023ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 101-6006-60125 20.87Postage01/20/21 - OVERNIGHT MAIL203994FEDEX 101-1007-60470 2,500.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…02/02/21 - PRINT AD FOR 2021 2ND QRT204028SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LIFE …101-3007-60461 130.56Fire Extinguisher01/25/21 - WC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYS SVC203991DESERT FIRE EXTINGUISHER C…101-3008-60664 516.02Fire Extinguisher01/25/21 - WC FIRE EXT MAINTANCE203991DESERT FIRE EXTINGUISHER C…101-3008-60664 33.00Postage01/09/21 - PICKUP SERVICE FEE204013ONTRAC 101-1007-60470 33.00Postage01/16/21 - PICKUP SERVICE FEE204013ONTRAC 101-1007-60470 44.22Postage01/19-01/23/21 - OVERNIGHT MAIL/SERV…204013ONTRAC 101-1007-60470 877.33Telephone - Utilities12/26/20-01/25/21 - LQPD CELL (6852)204045VERIZON WIRELESS 101-2001-61300 533.93Electricity - Utilities02/04/2021 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-2002-61101 13.19Electric - Monticello Park - Utili…02/04/2021 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61102 12.34Electric - Colonel Paige - Utiliti…02/04/2021 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61108 6,878.95Electric - Community Park - Util…02/04/2021 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61109 50.25Electric - Adams Park - Utilities02/04/2021 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61110 ATTACHMENT 1 93 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02687 - JB 02/12/21 2/18/2021 4:34:57 PM Page 2 of 6 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 13.55Electric - Velasco Park - Utilities02/04/2021 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61111 24.42Electric - Eisenhower Park - Util…02/04/2021 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61113 13.06Electric - Desert Pride - Utilities02/04/2021 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61114 392.60Water -Pioneer Park - Utilities02/24/2021 - WATER SERVICE203988COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61207 293.00Life Insurance Pay12/2020 - LIFE INSURANCE204031STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20947 2,579.18Disability Insurance Pay12/2020 - DISABILITY204031STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20955 357.46Add'l Life Insurance Pay12/2020 - ADD'L LIFE INSURANCE204033STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20948 298.80Life Insurance Pay02/2021 - LIFE INSURANCE204032STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20947 2,642.68Disability Insurance Pay02/2021 - DISABILITY204032STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20955 436.27Add'l Life Insurance Pay02/2021 - ADD'L LIFE INSURANCE204033STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20948 38.25Telephone - Utilities01/28-02/27/21 - SPORTS COMPLEX PHO…203996FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…101-3005-61300 106.89Gas - Utilities12/29/20-01/28/21 - FS #93 GAS SVC204037THE GAS COMPANY 101-2002-61100 295.90Life Insurance Pay01/2021 - LIFE INSURANCE204029STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20947 2,591.64Disability Insurance Pay01/2021 - DISABILITY204029STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20955 411.01Add'l Life Insurance Pay01/2021 - ADD'L LIFE INSURANCE204033STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20948 239.20Subscriptions & Publications01/15/21 - LABOR LAW POSTERS203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1004-60352 41.48Travel & Training01/20/21 - CASH HANDLING WORKSHOP D…203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1006-60320 200.00Travel & Training01/19/21 - 2021 CSMFO CONFERENCE C.…203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1006-60320 175.00Travel & Training01/28/21 - CMTA ANNUAL CONFERENCE203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1006-60320 677.94Sheriff - Other01/19/21 - POLICE CELL CASES/SCREEN P…203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-2001-60176 273.43Community Experiences01/13/21 - 22 EASTER BASKETS203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-3003-60149 313.13Community Experiences01/13/21 - EASTER PAINTING KITS203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-3003-60149 130.08Community Experiences01/27/21 - EASTER EVENT SUPPLIES203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-3003-60149 799.00Travel & Training09/14/20 - OSHA TRAINING E.HERNANDEZ203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-7006-60320 48.39Travel & Training01/27/21 - FOOD FOR SPECIAL CC MEETI…203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1001-60320 42.30Travel & Training01/19/21 - FOOD FOR CC MEETING203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1001-60320 152.24Office Supplies01/27/21 - TONER CARTRIDGES203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1002-60400 305.00Membership Dues01/12/21 - 2021 GFOA MEMBERSHIPS203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1006-60351 26.09Office Supplies01/04/21 - HEATER - J.BATRES203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1006-60400 195.72Citywide Conf Room Supplies01/25/21 - WIPES FOR CITYWIDE COPIERS203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-1007-60403 87.99Membership Dues01/05/21 - MAILCHIMP203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-3007-60351 0.99Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/22/21 - ICLOUD STORAGE K. CAMARE…203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-3007-60461 0.99Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/14/21 - ICLOUD STORAGE M. GRAHAM203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-3007-60461 14.99Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/10/21 - APPLE MUSIC203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-3007-60461 343.22Marketing & Tourism Promoti…12/2020 -FB ADS203981BANK OF THE WEST 101-3007-60461 157.21Materials/Supplies01/19/21 - PARK REPAIR SUPPLIES204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3005-60431 215.73Tools/Equipment01/14/21 - TOOL KITS204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3005-60432 48.79Safety Gear01/19/21 - GLOVES/EAR PLUGS204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60427 96.74Safety Gear01/12/21 - SAFETY SUPPLIES204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60427 39.59Materials/Supplies01/07/21 - GRAFFITI REMOVAL SUPPLIES204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60431 60.60Materials/Supplies01/27/21 - COPPER PIPE SUPPLIES204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60431 68.59Materials/Supplies01/27/21 - COPPER PIPE SUPPLIES204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60431 31.42Materials/Supplies01/27/21 - FLO SOLDER KIT204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60431 21.68Materials/Supplies01/15/21 - CFL BULBS204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60431 129.72Materials/Supplies01/13/21 - CFL LIGHT BULBS204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60431 30.55Materials/Supplies01/07/21 - ELECTIRCAL SUPPLIES204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60431 619.74Tools/Equipment01/19/21 - POWER TOOLS204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60432 216.41Tools/Equipment01/12/21 - DRILL KIT204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101-3008-60432 357.07Sheriff - Other09/25-10/24/20 - MOTOR FUEL CHARGES204022RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60176 469.77Sheriff - Other10/24-11/24/20 - MOTOR FUEL CHARGES204022RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60176 471.94Sheriff - Other12/25/20-01/24/21 - MOTOR FUEL CHAR…204022RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60176 Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Total:2,395,047.59 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND 99.83Traffic Control Signs12/08/20 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS204041TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 3,695.02Barricades02/03/21 - STREET BARRICADES204041TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60428 37.73Materials/Supplies12/20/20-01/20/21 - CYLINDER RENTAL204020PRAXAIR INC 201-7003-60431 18.47Traffic Control Signs01/11/21 - TRAFFIC SIGN POST204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 201-7003-60429 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total:3,851.05 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 179.44Materials/Supplies02/02/21 - PLANTS203985C.V CACTUS NURSERY 215-7004-60431 94 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02687 - JB 02/12/21 2/18/2021 4:34:57 PM Page 3 of 6 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 2,252.71Materials/Supplies01/22/21 - PVC SUPPLIES204027SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 215-7004-60431 1,395.90Maintenance/Services02/04/21 - ON-CALL ELECTRICAL SERVICES204047VINTAGE E & S INC 215-7004-60691 1,172.30Maintenance/Services02/04/21 - ON-CALL ELECTRICAL SERVICES204047VINTAGE E & S INC 215-7004-60691 1,128.91Maintenance/Services02/04/21 - ON-CALL ELECTRICAL SERVICES204047VINTAGE E & S INC 215-7004-60691 193.95Materials/Supplies01/25/21 - PLANTS203986CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSERY,…215-7004-60431 106.63Materials/Supplies01/23/21 - PLANTS203986CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSERY,…215-7004-60431 465.48Materials/Supplies01/29/21 - PLANTS203986CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSERY,…215-7004-60431 5,400.00Maintenance/Services01/26/21 - PLANT INSTALLATION SINALOA…204021PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 6,300.00Maintenance/Services01/26/21- PLANT INSTALLATION HILDALG…204021PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 1,780.00Maintenance/Services02/01/21 - PLANT INSTALL AT JEFFERSON …204021PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 1,675.00Maintenance/Services02/05/21 - PLANT INSTALLATION ON WAS…204021PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 1,845.00Maintenance/Services02/01/21 - PLANT INSTALLATION ON FRED…204021PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 650.00Maintenance/Services02/08/21 - PALM TREE TRIMMING204021PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 72.69Supplies-Graffiti and Vandalism01/06/21 - GRAFFITI REMOVAL SUPPLIES204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 215-7004-60423 3,047.42Electric - Utilities02/04/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61116 1,276.08Electric - Medians - Utilities02/04/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE204003IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61117 264.76Water - Medians - Utilities02/04/21 - WATER SERVICE203988COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 630.34Materials/Supplies02/02/21 - ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOXS204046VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60431 1,319.94Materials/Supplies02/08/21 - PLANTS204046VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60431 3,488.73Materials/Supplies01/26/21 - LED/FLOOD LIGHTS204048WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…215-7004-60431 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total:34,645.28 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND -13,147.38Burrtec AB 939 Fee12/31/20 - FY20/21 PROPERY TAX PAYME…203984BURRTEC WASTE & RECYCLING…221-0000-41506 Fund 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total:-13,147.38 Fund: 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/01/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204004LA QUINTA MAILBOXES PACK …247-0000-60510 12,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204024SANDBAR INC.247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204034SUB ROSA APOTHECARY 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204015PALM NAILS 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204008MARIACHI MEXICAN RESTAUR…247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204005LA QUINTA SALON AND DAY S…247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204006LAVENDER BISTRO INC.247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204001HEALTHY SELF WEIGHT LOSS 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203983BOBBY'S DETROIT CONEY ISLA…247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203993ESPINOZA, VICTORIA RANGEL 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204050WONDERCUTS INC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204035THE BEER HUNTER 247-0000-60510 3,960.33Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203995FORTUN'S KITCHEN AND BAR, …247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/04/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204043TRISH'S LASHES 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/08/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM203979AMADOR, SARAH 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/08/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204007LIS MASSAGE LLC 247-0000-60510 10,000.00Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Relief P…02/08/21 - COVID 19 REBATE PROGRAM204016PALM SPRINGS CULTURAL CEN…247-0000-60510 Fund 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Total:165,960.33 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 11,237.50APP Maintenance01/18/21 -SECOND ROUND OF PUBLIC ART…204025SIGNATURE SCULPTURE 270-0000-60683 227.14APP Maintenance01/21/21 - APP PROGRAM MURALS SUPPL…203981BANK OF THE WEST 270-0000-60683 408.97APP Maintenance01/20/21 - APP PROGRAM MURALS SUPPL…203981BANK OF THE WEST 270-0000-60683 281.66APP Maintenance01/21/21 - PAINT SPRAYER FOR APP MUR…204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 270-0000-60683 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total:12,155.27 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 13.87Construction01/05/21 - ANTI-STATIC BAGS AND LABELS203981BANK OF THE WEST 401-0000-60188 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total:13.87 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 8,858.63City Bldg Repl/Repair02/04/21 - Council Chambers Carpet Instal…204039THE WORKS FLOOR & WALL 501-0000-71103 14,929.49City Bldg Repl/Repair02/10/21 - Old 32 Emergency Repairs AM…204000H&G HOME IMPROVEMENTS I…501-0000-71103 1,929.92Fuel & Oil01/16-01/31/21 - FUEL204042TOWER ENERGY GROUP 501-0000-60674 855.96Parts & Maintenance Supplies01/06/21 - FRONT TIRES FOR TRUCK # 10204018PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 501-0000-60675 251.64Parts & Maintenance Supplies01/26/21 - VEHICEL TIRE REPAIR204018PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 501-0000-60675 100.00Vehicle Repair & Maintenance02/04/21 - TOW TRUCK #11 FLAT TIRE204019PLAZA TOWING 501-0000-60676 95 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02687 - JB 02/12/21 2/18/2021 4:34:57 PM Page 4 of 6 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 25.03Street Sweeper01/20/21 - ANTIFREEZE FOR SWEEPER TR…203980AUTOZONE 501-0000-60678 37.17Parts & Maintenance Supplies01/28/21 - WIPER BLADES TRUCK #41203980AUTOZONE 501-0000-60675 983.25Fuel & Oil01/20/21 - HAZADOUS WASTE REMOVAL203992ENVIRONMENTAL LOGISTICS, …501-0000-60674 3,088.51Building Leases01/2021 - PW TRAILER RENTAL204014PACIFIC MOBILE STRUCTURES, …501-0000-71032 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total:31,059.60 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 24,575.00Consultants02/2021 - IT SERVICES203977ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 502-0000-60104 600.00Public Works, Software Enhan…02/2021 - TRAFFIC INFRASTRUCTURE IT S…203977ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 502-0000-71048 85.98Cable - Utilities01/25-02/24/21 - C.H. INTERNET203996FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61400 86.86Cable - Utilities01/27-02/26/21 - BLACKHAWK/LQ PARK D…203996FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61400 91.86Cable - Utilities01/26-02/25/21 - C.H. DSL203996FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61400 14.99Software Licenses01/2021 - ADOBE HOME BASE J.DELGADO203981BANK OF THE WEST 502-0000-60301 59.00D & D, Software Enhancements12/24/20-01/24/21 - BI SUBSCRIPTION203981BANK OF THE WEST 502-0000-71042 195.72Machinery & Equipment01/13/21 - 3 POWER ADAPTERS203981BANK OF THE WEST 502-0000-80100 50.00Software Licenses01/13-02/13/21 - BASECAMP203981BANK OF THE WEST 502-0000-60301 217.49Machinery & Equipment01/08/21 - COMPUTER MONITOR203981BANK OF THE WEST 502-0000-80100 1,011.75Machinery & Equipment01/08/21 - IT SUPPLIES203981BANK OF THE WEST 502-0000-80100 215.66Machinery & Equipment01/06/21 - DOCKING STATION203981BANK OF THE WEST 502-0000-80100 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total:27,204.31 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 30,839.50Parks01/28/21 - DRINKING FOUNTAINS204009MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI…503-0000-71060 4,407.87Parks01/28/21 - PLAYGROUND DIGGERS203998GAMETIME 503-0000-71060 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total:35,247.37 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 6.67Repair & Maintenance01/11/21 - PTFE TAPE204002HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 601-0000-60660 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total:6.67 Grand Total:2,692,043.96 96 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02687 - JB 02/12/21 2/18/2021 4:34:57 PM Page 5 of 6 Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 101 - GENERAL FUND 2,395,047.59 201 - GAS TAX FUND 3,851.05 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 34,645.28 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND -13,147.38 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 165,960.33 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 12,155.27 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 13.87 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 31,059.60 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 27,204.31 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 35,247.37 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 6.67 Grand Total:2,692,043.96 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-0000-20304 Sales Taxes Payable 20.00 101-0000-20307 Due to Waste Manageme…2,510,589.81 101-0000-20943 Dental Insurance Pay 23,521.10 101-0000-20945 Vision Insurance Pay 5,004.44 101-0000-20947 Life Insurance Pay 887.70 101-0000-20948 Add'l Life Insurance Pay 1,204.74 101-0000-20955 Disability Insurance Pay 7,813.50 101-0000-20981 United Way Deductions 72.00 101-0000-22810 Developer Deposits 40,500.00 101-0000-41505 Franchise Taxes - Burrtec -249,800.22 101-1001-60320 Travel & Training 90.69 101-1002-60400 Office Supplies 152.24 101-1004-60352 Subscriptions & Publicati…239.20 101-1006-60320 Travel & Training 416.48 101-1006-60351 Membership Dues 305.00 101-1006-60400 Office Supplies 26.09 101-1006-60410 Printing 200.36 101-1007-60403 Citywide Conf Room Suppl…195.72 101-1007-60470 Postage 200.67 101-2001-60109 LQ Police Volunteers 230.00 101-2001-60165 Special Enforcement/City …-125.01 101-2001-60174 Blood/Alcohol Testing 979.00 101-2001-60176 Sheriff - Other 1,976.72 101-2001-61300 Telephone - Utilities 877.33 101-2001-71031 Vehicles 125.01 101-2002-61100 Gas - Utilities 106.89 101-2002-61101 Electricity - Utilities 533.93 101-2002-61400 Cable - Utilities 89.99 101-3003-60149 Community Experiences 716.64 101-3005-60431 Materials/Supplies 357.31 101-3005-60432 Tools/Equipment 215.73 101-3005-61102 Electric - Monticello Park -…13.19 101-3005-61108 Electric - Colonel Paige - U…12.34 101-3005-61109 Electric - Community Park …6,878.95 101-3005-61110 Electric - Adams Park - Util…50.25 101-3005-61111 Electric - Velasco Park - Uti…13.55 101-3005-61113 Electric - Eisenhower Park …24.42 101-3005-61114 Electric - Desert Pride - Uti…13.06 101-3005-61207 Water -Pioneer Park - Utili…392.60 101-3005-61300 Telephone - Utilities 38.25 101-3007-60351 Membership Dues 87.99 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pro…21,123.60 101-3008-60427 Safety Gear 145.53 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 382.15 97 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02687 - JB 02/12/21 2/18/2021 4:34:57 PM Page 6 of 6 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3008-60432 Tools/Equipment 836.15 101-3008-60664 Fire Extinguisher 646.58 101-6004-60120 Lot Cleaning/Gravel Progr…295.00 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 6.39 101-6004-60690 Uniforms 223.07 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servic…5,360.11 101-7003-60432 Tools/Equipment 603.35 101-7006-60144 Contract Traffic Engineer 9,379.00 101-7006-60320 Travel & Training 799.00 201-7003-60428 Barricades 3,695.02 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 118.30 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 37.73 215-7004-60423 Supplies-Graffiti and Van…72.69 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 8,637.22 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 21,347.11 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 3,047.42 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utiliti…1,276.08 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utilities 264.76 221-0000-41506 Burrtec AB 939 Fee -13,147.38 247-0000-60510 Small Bus.Emer. Econ. Rel…165,960.33 270-0000-60683 APP Maintenance 12,155.27 401-0000-60188 Construction 13.87 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 2,913.17 501-0000-60675 Parts & Maintenance Supp…1,144.77 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Mainte…100.00 501-0000-60678 Street Sweeper 25.03 501-0000-71032 Building Leases 3,088.51 501-0000-71103 City Bldg Repl/Repair 23,788.12 502-0000-60104 Consultants 24,575.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 64.99 502-0000-61400 Cable - Utilities 264.70 502-0000-71042 D & D, Software Enhance…59.00 502-0000-71048 Public Works, Software E…600.00 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 1,640.62 503-0000-71060 Parks 35,247.37 601-0000-60660 Repair & Maintenance 6.67 Grand Total:2,692,043.96 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense AmountProject Account Name Project Name **None**2,627,691.05**None****None** 18-001E 40,500.00VTL PALIZADA LLC EXPENSE VTL PALIZADA LLC 201804E 22,113.17Landscape & Lighting Median Island …Landscape & Lighting Median Island Improvements 2021TMICT 13.87Construction Expense FY20/21 Traffic Maintenance Improvements CORONANR 984.20Corona Non Reimbursable Corona Virus Emergency Response CSA152E 25.03CSA 152 Expenses CSA 152 Project Tracking EGGE 716.64La Quinta Egg Hunt Expense La Quinta Egg Hunt Grand Total:2,692,043.96 98 2/18/2021 4:37:03 PM Page 1 of 2 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT02688 - JB 02/12/21 (2) AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 161.97Rental Expense01/14/-02/13/21 - DUNE PALMS MOBILE …204053TIME WARNER CABLE 241-9104-60157 1,345.00Rental Expense01/08/21 - DUNE PALMS MOBILE ESTATES…204052JAY VEE ELECTRIC INC 241-9104-60157 4,890.04Rental Expense01/2021 - DUNE PALMS MOBILE ESTATES…204051COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…241-9104-60157 Fund 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY Total:6,397.01 Grand Total:6,397.01 99 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02688 - JB 02/12/21 (2) 2/18/2021 4:37:03 PM Page 2 of 2 Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 6,397.01 Grand Total:6,397.01 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 241-9104-60157 Rental Expense 6,397.01 Grand Total:6,397.01 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense AmountProject Account Name Project Name **None**6,397.01**None****None** Grand Total:6,397.01 100 2/22/2021 10:52:10 AM Page 1 of 5 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT02694 - JB 02/19/21 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND 735.00Plan Checks11/2020 ONCALL BLDG PLAN REVIEW & IN…204072ESGIL CORPORATION 101-6003-60118 2,730.00Plan Checks12/2020 ONCALL BLDG PLAN REVIEW & I…204072ESGIL CORPORATION 101-6003-60118 951.00BSAS SB 1473 Fees07/01-09/30/20 - BSAS SB 1473 FEES204061CALIFORNIA BUILDING STAND…101-0000-20306 32.20Mechanical Permits02/09/21 - PERMIT REFUND BMCH2020-0…204086JACOBY, ERIC 101-0000-42402 -95.10CBSC Administrative Fees07/01-09/30/20 - RETAINER PAYMENT204061CALIFORNIA BUILDING STAND…101-0000-42615 150.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…02/09/21 - DRONE VIDEO ASSETS OF TOP …204077GATHERUM, ZACHARY 101-3007-60461 972.00BSAS SB 1473 Fees10/01-12/31/20 - BSAS SB 1473 FEES204061CALIFORNIA BUILDING STAND…101-0000-20306 -97.20CBSC Administrative Fees10/01-12/31/20 - RETAINER PAYMENT204061CALIFORNIA BUILDING STAND…101-0000-42615 72.97LQ Police Volunteers02/09/21 - POLICE BUSINESS CARDS204096PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-2001-60109 218.91Marketing & Tourism Promoti…02/09/21 - CODE & COUNCIL CARDS204096PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-3007-60461 2,000.00Administrative Citations02/10/21 - REFUND CITATION LQ161120204097PODJAVORSEK, HEIDI M.101-0000-42700 112.00Instructors02/11/21 - TAI CHI CHUAN204091MEDEIROS, JOYCELEEN 101-3002-60107 125.00Instructors02/11/21 - STRETCH & RESTORE204088JOHNSON, KAREN T. PAYNE 101-3002-60107 224.00Instructors02/11/21 - ESSENTIAL FITNESS204101RUDY, LORI A 101-3002-60107 539.00Instructors02/11/21 - PILATES204123WILLIAMS, BILLEE 101-3002-60107 180.00Instructors02/11/21 - SCULPT FIT CORE204088JOHNSON, KAREN T. PAYNE 101-3002-60107 95.00Operating Supplies02/14/21 - STAFF POLO SHIRTS204096PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-3003-60420 445.99Marketing & Tourism Promoti…02/14/21 - STAFF POLO SHIRTS204096PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-3007-60461 318.19Supplies-Graffiti and Vandalism02/08/21 - GRAFFITI VANDALISM PANIT204111THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.101-3005-60423 171.21Professional Services02/2021 - ARMORED SVCS204076GARDAWORLD 101-1006-60103 2,750.00Marketing & Tourism Promoti…02/03-03/02/21 BUSINESS REOPEN DIGIT…204109THE LAMAR COMPANIES 101-3007-60461 5,256.25Plan Checks11/2020 ONCALL BLDG PLAN REVIEW & IN…204085INTERWEST CONSULTING GR…101-6003-60118 1,485.00Maintenance/Services02/10/21 - FRITZ BURNS WATER LEAK REP…204080H&G HOME IMPROVEMENTS I…101-3008-60691 501.63Administrative Citation Services11/2020 - POLICE CITIATION PROCESSING204066DATA TICKET, INC.101-6004-60111 6,350.00Plan Checks12/2020 ONCALL BLDG PLAN REVIEW & IN…204085INTERWEST CONSULTING GR…101-6003-60118 88.20Operating Supplies12/16/20 - DRINKING WATER204105SPARKLETTS 101-7003-60420 -215.00Membership Dues02/20/20 - RECLASS TO 101-6003-60351204060CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICI…101-6006-60351 215.00Membership Dues02/20/20 - RECLASS FROM 101-6006-603…204060CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICI…101-6003-60351 70.00Travel & Training02/10/21 - 2019 CEC WEBINAR J.FUSON204060CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICI…101-6003-60320 508.00Map/Plan Checking01/2021 - ONCALL PLAN CHECK SVCS ENG…204082HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 101-7002-60183 540.59Professional Services01/2021 PROJECT MGMT OF FEMA DOC S…204119VANIR CONSTRUCTION MANA…101-1006-60103 28.45Natural Disaster - FEMA01/2021 PROJ MGMT OF FEMA DOC SVCS…204119VANIR CONSTRUCTION MANA…101-1007-50180 37.50LQ Police Volunteers10/05/20 - LQPD WEBSITE SUPPORT204079GRAPHTEK HOSTING, LLC 101-2001-60109 4,950.00Maintenance/Services11/13/20 - FLAGSTONE AT CIVIC CENTER …204069DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUC…101-3005-60691 4,750.00Maintenance/Services02/03/21 - DRINKING FOUNTAIN INSTALL…204069DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUC…101-3005-60691 772.00Maintenance/Services02/12/21 - MAIN WATER LINE REPAIR204121VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 101-3005-60691 320.00Maintenance/Services02/12/21 - TREE REMOVAL204121VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 101-3005-60691 410.00Maintenance/Services02/12/21 - MAIN WATER LINE REPAIR204121VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 101-3005-60691 9,525.00Golf Tournament01/27/21 - AMR SVCS FOR AMEX TOURN…204106SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE…101-2002-60525 1,678.47Telephone - Utilities01/23-02/22/21 - EOC PHONE LINE SVC204116TPX COMMUNICATIONS 101-2002-61300 150.06Office Supplies02/04/21 - BLACK GLASS BOARD K.GUNTE…204107STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-7001-60400 1,837.94Professional Services01/2021 - PGA BLVD AMEX204058BURRTEC WASTE & RECYCLING…101-1002-60103 680.00Map/Plan Checking02/08/21 - ONCALL MAP CHECKING SERVI…204099RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 1,155.84Temporary Agency Services01/29/21 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES M. G…204100ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 101-6006-60125 771.42Temporary Agency Services02/05/21 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES T.SU…204093OFFICE TEAM 101-6006-60125 1,155.84Temporary Agency Services02/05/21 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES M. G…204100ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 101-6006-60125 290.00Membership Dues2021 - CHAPTER 57 MEMBERSHIP DUES A.…204084INTERNATIONAL RIGHT OF WA…101-1002-60351 120.00Materials/Supplies02/10/21 - CENTER STRAPS FOR FRITZ BU…204065COURTMASTER SPORTS, INC.101-3005-60431 40.00Pest Control02/05/21 - FB POOL PEST CONTROL204117TRULY NOLEN INC 101-3008-60116 81.05Postage01/28-01/29/21 - OVERNIGHT MAIL204073FEDEX 101-1007-60470 330.00Blood/Alcohol Testing10/27-11/15/20 - BLOOD TEST204056AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES …101-2001-60174 4,817.55Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/2021 INVOICES & 02/2021 RETAINER204087JNS MEDIA SPECIALISTS 101-3007-60461 1,700.51Materials/Supplies11/20/20 - COVID 19 SIGNAGE204113TOP OF THE LINE SIGNS 101-3005-60431 101 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02694 - JB 02/19/21 2/22/2021 10:52:10 AM Page 2 of 5 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 970.76Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance02/12/21 - PAINT FOR FB POOL204111THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.101-3005-60184 1,204.92Materials/Supplies02/05/21 - FRITZ BURN RESTROOM SUPPL…204078GRAINGER 101-3008-60431 27.48Materials/Supplies02/08/21 - KEY CREATION204110THE LOCK SHOP, INC 101-3008-60431 88.17Water - Utilities02/11/21 - WATER SERVICE204064COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-2002-61200 17.68Water - Utilities02/11/21 - WATER SERVICE204064COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3008-61200 264.00Attorney888446 - LQ ART CELEBRATION204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 2,664.00Attorney888449 - COVID-19 ADVICE204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 48.00Attorney888448 - ART SIGNATURE LQ204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 48.00Attorney888447 - LQ ART SIGNATURE204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 312.00Attorney888445 - SIGNAURE ART EVENT 2020204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 15,940.25Attorney888444 - DUNE PALMS204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 1,124.50Attorney888443 - SRR204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 528.00Attorney888440 - PERSONNEL204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 6,342.00Attorney888439 - GENERAL204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 1,887.11Attorney888442 - CODE204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60153 162.50Attorney/Litigation888441 - LITIGATION204102RUTAN & TUCKER 101-1003-60154 48.38Telephone - Utilities02/2021 - LQ PARK PHONE204074FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…101-3005-61300 1,603.33Marketing & Tourism Promoti…01/29-02/25/21 - NCM THEATER ADVERTI…204092NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 101-3007-60461 Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Total:96,312.55 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND 254.91Traffic Control Signs02/10/21 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS204114TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total:254.91 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 24.91Maintenance/Services02/12/21 - PAINTING SUPPLIES204111THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.202-3004-60691 69.59Maintenance/Services02/12/21 - PAINT FOR LIBRARY204111THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.202-3004-60691 237.14Water - Utilities02/11/21 - WATER SERVICE204064COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…202-3006-61200 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total:331.64 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 5,278.00SilverRock Way Landscape01/2021 - FY 20/21 SRR PERIMETE204090LANDMARK GOLF MANAGEM…215-7004-60143 828.13Materials/Supplies02/02/21 - PLANTS204059C.V CACTUS NURSERY 215-7004-60431 73.27Materials/Supplies02/08/21 - PLANTS204121VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60431 2,147.82Materials/Supplies02/11/21 - RIVER ROCK204104SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO…215-7004-60431 217.28Safety Gear02/09/21 - FACE MASKS204107STAPLES ADVANTAGE 215-7004-60427 701.42Materials/Supplies02/01/21 - IRRIGATION CONTROLLER204103SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 215-7004-60431 343.75Materials/Supplies01/26/21 - YELLOW 2-POLY PIPE204081HD SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION S…215-7004-60431 310.32Materials/Supplies01/11/21 - PLANTS204062CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSERY,…215-7004-60431 972.57Materials/Supplies01/12/21 - PLANTS204062CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSERY,…215-7004-60431 116.37Materials/Supplies02/02/21 - PLANTS204062CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSERY,…215-7004-60431 237.01Materials/Supplies02/04/21 - PLANTS204062CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSERY,…215-7004-60431 4,700.00Maintenance/Services02/09/21 - PLANT REPLACEMENT MONTE…204098PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 5,300.00Maintenance/Services02/09/21 - PLANT INSTALLATION TAMPICO…204098PWLC II, INC 215-7004-60691 2,802.75Supplies-Graffiti and Vandalism02/11/21 - ALUMINUM SIGN PANEL204057BEST SIGNS INC 215-7004-60423 13.06Electric - Medians - Utilities02/11/21 - ELECTRICITY SERVICES204083IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61117 1,424.69Water - Medians - Utilities02/11/21 - WATER SERVICE204064COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 360.18Materials/Supplies02/09/21 - LED LAMPS204122WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR…215-7004-60431 1,111.46Materials/Supplies01/22/21 - LAMPS204070DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 215-7004-60431 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total:26,938.08 Fund: 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 1,600.00Travel & Training01/12/21 - CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST …204094ORTEGA, ANTHONY 230-0000-60320 333.60Contributions to State Agency10/2020-12/2020 - SB 1186 FEES 10%204071DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHI…230-0000-60480 444.40Contributions to State Agency07/2020-09/2020 - SB 1186 FEES 10%204071DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHI…230-0000-60480 Fund 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 Total:2,378.00 Fund: 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 6,480.00Attorney888450 - 2020 REFUNDING BONDS204102RUTAN & TUCKER 231-9001-60153 Fund 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF Total:6,480.00 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS -19,547.88Retention Payable01/21/21 - PROJ 2014-13 RETENTION #6204089JONES BROS CONSTRUCTION …401-0000-20600 390,957.50Construction01/21/21 - 2014-13 SILVERROCK WAY ST …204089JONES BROS CONSTRUCTION …401-0000-60188 102 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02694 - JB 02/19/21 2/22/2021 10:52:10 AM Page 3 of 5 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number -6,836.46Retention Payable01/2021 - 2016-03E RETENION PAYMENT …204118URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-20600 136,729.20Construction01/2021 - 2016-03E PROGRESS PAYMENT…204118URBAN HABITAT 401-0000-60188 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total:501,302.36 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 2,498.75Fuel & Oil12/01-12/15/20 - FUEL204115TOWER ENERGY GROUP 501-0000-60674 1,074.23Vehicle Repair & Maintenance12/04/20 - STORAGE BOX INSTALLATION …204054A & J TRUCK REPAIR 501-0000-60676 3,088.51Building Leases03/2021 - PW TRAILER RENTAL204095PACIFIC MOBILE STRUCTURES, …501-0000-71032 13.00Street Sweeper01/2021 - SWEEPER FUEL204108THE GAS COMPANY 501-0000-60678 1,883.77Fuel & Oil12/2020-01/2021 - FUEL CHARGES204075FUELMAN 501-0000-60674 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total:8,558.26 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 171.63Cable - Utilities02/2021 - C.H. CABLE (4625)204112TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-61400 7,400.00D & D, Software Enhancements11/19/20-02/19/21 - STVR PLATFORM TR…204067DECKARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.502-0000-71042 13,881.66Computers01/30/21 - LATITUDE BASES & DELL DOCKS…204068DELL MARKETING LP 502-0000-80103 2,372.26Copiers02/2021 CITY PRINTER & 01/2021 METER …204063CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, …502-0000-60662 736.30Copiers02/20-03/19/21 - CANON COPIER CONTR…204063CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, …502-0000-60662 3,100.29Telephone - Utilities01/23-02/22/21 - EOC PHONE LINE SVC204116TPX COMMUNICATIONS 502-0000-61300 322.55Consultants01/2021 - IT SERVICES204055ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 502-0000-60104 1,268.07Cell/Mobile Phones01/02-02/01/21 - CITY IPADS (5587)204120VERIZON WIRELESS 502-0000-61301 1,949.32Cell/Mobile Phones01/02-02/01/21 - CITY CELL SVC (5496)204120VERIZON WIRELESS 502-0000-61301 217.15Cable - Utilities02/04-03/03/21 - DSL SVC204074FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61400 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total:31,419.23 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 648.65Bank Fees02/2021 - SRR ARMORED SVC204076GARDAWORLD 601-0000-60455 42.56Bank Fees01/2021 - SRR ARMORED SVC204076GARDAWORLD 601-0000-60455 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total:691.21 Grand Total:674,666.24 103 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02694 - JB 02/19/21 2/22/2021 10:52:10 AM Page 4 of 5 Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 101 - GENERAL FUND 96,312.55 201 - GAS TAX FUND 254.91 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 331.64 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 26,938.08 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 2,378.00 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 6,480.00 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501,302.36 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 8,558.26 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 31,419.23 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 691.21 Grand Total:674,666.24 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-0000-20306 BSAS SB 1473 Fees 1,923.00 101-0000-42402 Mechanical Permits 32.20 101-0000-42615 CBSC Administrative Fees -192.30 101-0000-42700 Administrative Citations 2,000.00 101-1002-60103 Professional Services 1,837.94 101-1002-60351 Membership Dues 290.00 101-1003-60153 Attorney 29,157.86 101-1003-60154 Attorney/Litigation 162.50 101-1006-60103 Professional Services 711.80 101-1007-50180 Natural Disaster - FEMA 28.45 101-1007-60470 Postage 81.05 101-2001-60109 LQ Police Volunteers 110.47 101-2001-60174 Blood/Alcohol Testing 330.00 101-2002-60525 Golf Tournament 9,525.00 101-2002-61200 Water - Utilities 88.17 101-2002-61300 Telephone - Utilities 1,678.47 101-3002-60107 Instructors 1,180.00 101-3003-60420 Operating Supplies 95.00 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Maintena…970.76 101-3005-60423 Supplies-Graffiti and Van…318.19 101-3005-60431 Materials/Supplies 1,820.51 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 11,202.00 101-3005-61300 Telephone - Utilities 48.38 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pro…9,985.78 101-3008-60116 Pest Control 40.00 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 1,232.40 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 1,485.00 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 17.68 101-6003-60118 Plan Checks 15,071.25 101-6003-60320 Travel & Training 70.00 101-6003-60351 Membership Dues 215.00 101-6004-60111 Administrative Citation Se…501.63 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servic…3,083.10 101-6006-60351 Membership Dues -215.00 101-7001-60400 Office Supplies 150.06 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 1,188.00 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 88.20 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 254.91 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 94.50 202-3006-61200 Water - Utilities 237.14 215-7004-60143 SilverRock Way Landscape 5,278.00 215-7004-60423 Supplies-Graffiti and Van…2,802.75 215-7004-60427 Safety Gear 217.28 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 7,202.30 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 10,000.00 104 Demand Register Packet: APPKT02694 - JB 02/19/21 2/22/2021 10:52:10 AM Page 5 of 5 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utiliti…13.06 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utilities 1,424.69 230-0000-60320 Travel & Training 1,600.00 230-0000-60480 Contributions to State Ag…778.00 231-9001-60153 Attorney 6,480.00 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable -26,384.34 401-0000-60188 Construction 527,686.70 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 4,382.52 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Mainte…1,074.23 501-0000-60678 Street Sweeper 13.00 501-0000-71032 Building Leases 3,088.51 502-0000-60104 Consultants 322.55 502-0000-60662 Copiers 3,108.56 502-0000-61300 Telephone - Utilities 3,100.29 502-0000-61301 Cell/Mobile Phones 3,217.39 502-0000-61400 Cable - Utilities 388.78 502-0000-71042 D & D, Software Enhance…7,400.00 502-0000-80103 Computers 13,881.66 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 691.21 Grand Total:674,666.24 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense AmountProject Account Name Project Name **None**151,017.33**None****None** 141513CT 390,957.50Construction Expense SilverRock Way Infra/Street Improvements 141513RP -19,547.88Retention Payable SilverRock Way Infra/Street Improvements 201603CT 136,729.20Construction Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement 201603RP -6,836.46Retention Payable La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement 201804E 10,000.00Landscape & Lighting Median Island …Landscape & Lighting Median Island Improvements CORONANR 4,905.10Corona Non Reimbursable Corona Virus Emergency Response CORONAP 28.45ContractsCorona Virus Emergency Response CSA152E 13.00CSA 152 Expenses CSA 152 Project Tracking STVRE 7,400.00Short Term Vacation Rental Expense Short Term Vacation Rental Tracking Grand Total:674,666.24 105 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 02/08 – 02/19/2021 Wire Transaction Listed below are the wire transfers from 02/08 – 02/19/2021 Wire Transfers: 02/08/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - AMERICAN FIDELITY 3,759.54$ 02/08/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - AMERICAN FIDELITY 3,759.54$ 02/09/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 121,652.80$ 02/09/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - AMERICAN FIDELITY 1,821.96$ 02/09/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - TEXAS LIFE 849.25$ 02/09/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - PROFESSIONAL SVCS 2,400.84$ 02/16/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - WELLS FARGO 84.96$ 02/18/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - BOND DEBT SVC 4,038,375.94$ 02/18/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK 150,456.12$ 02/19/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 20,290.18$ 02/19/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 13,460.73$ 02/19/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 6,150.29$ 02/19/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 5,817.09$ 02/19/2021 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 432.00$ TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT 4,369,311.24$ ATTACHMENT 2 106 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 16, 2021: INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 11.100 OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO A POLICY WITH OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM; AND APPROVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CITYWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM RECOMMENDATION A. Move to take up Ordinance No. ___ by title and number only and waive further reading. B. Move to introduce at first reading, Ordinance No. ____to add chapter 11.100 of the Municipal Code related to a policy with operational procedures for a public safety camera system. C. Approve policies and procedures for a public safety camera system in La Quinta EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In September 2016, the City Council formed an Ad-Hoc Committee (Committee) to assess the potential use of a public safety camera system (PSCS) to enhance public safety. As part of the PSCS, Council directed staff to create policies and procedures to oversee the system. Staff has presented an evolving draft to Council at two Study Sessions for discussion. The latest version presented to Council on February 16, 2021 incorporated public input and comments from Riverside County Sheriffi’s Deapartment Captain Lopez, and has been reviewed by the City Attorney. At the February 16, 2021 meeting, Council recommended staff to make changes to the Policies and Procedures to strengthen its purpose and require a 4/5 council vote to approve any future changes to the PSCS. This business item was continued to March 2, 2021, to allow time for staff to make the requested changes. BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 107 FISCAL IMPACT – None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On September 20, 2016, the Council established the Committee to study the use of a PSCS as a tool for police, fire, and emergency responders. Since then, the Committee has conducted 28 community meetings; 2 focus groups, 2 community surveys; of those, 22 community meetings were during the 90- Day Pilot Program in 2019. In addition, staff has presented updates and information at 11 separate Council meetings; 4 study sessions, 2 business sessions and provided 5 department reports. The most recent report was presented to Council on February 16, 2021. On March 6, 2018, Council asked staff to develop a draft set of Policies and Procedures to guide the PSCS that would address privacy concerns. On January 15, 2019, staff presented Council with draft policies and procedures for discussion. These were formulated after examining numerous cities’ governing policies and selected the best elements that would be suitable for La Quinta’s needs. The policies were reviewed by the City’s insurance carrier, California Joint Powers Insurance Authority, and the City Attorney. At this meeting, Council directed staff to gather additional input from residents. Staff collected feedback during the 22 community meetings as part of the PSCS pilot program between March 1, 2019 to May 30, 2019. Based on the comments received, staff worked with the City Attorney to include residents’ comments, strengthen specific clauses to protect individual privacy rights, limit system access and establish a process for Council to authorize the use of technology related to license plate readers and face recognition. On February 16, 2021, the third draft was presented to council, this version incorporated comments from Captain Lopez, concerning the potential transmittal and use of recorded images for evidentiary purposes and was reviewed by the City Attorney. At this meeting, Council requested additional changes, including strengthening the purpose of the Policies and Procedures to ensure it is used as operational procedures and not as a guideline. In addition, Council reached a consensus that any amendment to the Policies and Procedures to include integration of any new or additional public safety technology or new equipment, may be adopted by no less than four-fifths (4/5) majority vote of the Council. Council continued the business item to March 2, 2021, to allow time for staff to make these revisions to the Policies and Procedures (Attachment 1) and present an ordinance to add Chapter 11.100 of the Municipal Code related to a policy with operational procedures for a public safety camera system. 108 Timetable: January 15, 2019 – the first draft of Policies and Procedures presented to Council - based on other cities policies, and review by City’s insurance carrier and City Attorney. June 18, 2019 – staff completed 90-Day Pilot Program and hosted 22 community meetings to gather community feedback on camera system and policies and procedures. December 3, 2019 – staff presented the second draft of the Policies and Procedures, amended based on public input and review by City Attorney. September 15, 2020 – staff provided the Policies and Procedures draft to council as part of the PSCS Update. February 16, 2021 – staff presented the third draft of the Policies and Procedures to Council. Council requested additional revisions for consideration on March 2, 2021. Upon Council approval, the PSCS Policies and Procedures would be a governing document for the operation of the system. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to not approve the PSCS Policies and Procedures and Ordinance as presented or direct staff to make additional edits to the documents. Prepared by: Martha Mendez, Public Safety Manager Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director Attachment: 1. Draft Policies & Procedures for Public Safety Camera Systems 109 110 ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 11.100 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO A POLICY WITH OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM WHEREAS, in September 2016, the City Council of the City of La Quinta (City Council) formed an ad-hoc committee to assess the potential use of a public safety camera system to enhance public safety; and WHEREAS, the ad-hoc committee held 32 community outreach meetings, conducted a pilot program with three firms, and hired a firm to design a city-wide system; and WHEREAS, the City Council requested the development of a policy with operational procedures to apply for any city-wide public safety camera system; and WHEREAS, as the City Council wants to ensure full and careful consideration whenever the policy with operational procedures may be amended to include integration of any new or additional public safety technology and new equipment, a vote of no less than four-fifths (4/5) majority of the Council must approve any such adoption and amendment to allow such technology and equipment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 11.100 of the La Quinta Municipal Code is hereby approved by the City Council and shall be added as written in “Exhibit A” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, 111 Ordinance No. XXX Addition of Chapter 11.100 Public Safety Camera System Policy Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 2 of 4 together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: The City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to “Exhibit A” to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this ___ day of _________, 2021 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk 112 Ordinance No. XXX Addition of Chapter 11.100 Public Safety Camera System Policy Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 3 of 4 City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 113 Ordinance No. XXX Addition of Chapter 11.100 Public Safety Camera System Policy Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 4 of 4 CHAPTER 11.100 PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY 11.100.010 Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare by authorizing the adoption of a policy with operational procedures for a public safety camera system, and ensuring full and careful consideration by the city council whenever the policy may be amended to include integration of any new or additional public safety technology and equipment including, but not limited to, the addition of new equipment or use of gunshot detection, incident mapping, crime analysis, license plate recognition, facial recognition, audio, and other video-based analytical systems technology. 11.100.020 Adoption and Amendment to Policy and Operational Procedures. A. The city council may adopt a policy with operational procedures for the use of any public safety camera system in the city. Upon such adoption, the policy shall govern the operation and use of the public safety camera system. B. Upon the adoption by the city council of a policy with operational procedures described in Subsection A, no amendment to that policy to include integration of any new or additional public safety technology or new equipment, like that described in Section 11.100.010, may be adopted except by no less than four-fifths (4/5) majority vote of the city council. * * * EXHIBIT A 114 Page 1 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 02‐23‐2021) Public Safety Camera System Policies and Procedures PURPOSE AND SCOPE The City of La Quinta and the La Quinta Police Department collectively operate, monitor, and maintain a Public Safety Camera System (PSCS) for the purpose of creating a safer environment for all those who live, work, and visit the City. The City and Police Department’s operation of a PSCS complements its anti- crime strategy to effectively allocate and deploy personnel, and to enhance public safety and security in public areas. POLICY This policy explains the purpose of the cameras and includes operational procedures for their operation, for the storage of captured images by the City, and transmittal of captured images to law enforcement or other public agency for evidentiary purposes. Video monitoring in public places will be conducted in a legal and ethical manner while recognizing and protecting constitutional standards of privacy. PLACEMENT AND MONITORING These high definition cameras will be placed in strategic locations throughout the City to detect and deter crime, to help safeguard against potential threats to the public, to help manage emergency response situations during natural and man-made disasters and to assist City officials in providing services to the community. The City Manager or the authorized designee shall approve all proposed locations for the use of video monitoring technology and should consult with and be guided by legal counsel as necessary in making such determinations. Contributing factors shall be taken into consideration including but not limited to lighting, alignment of buildings, existing vegetation, or other obstructions when selecting camera placement. OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES Only City and/or department-approved video monitoring equipment shall be utilized. The La Quinta Police, La Quinta Fire, City staff, and vendors as approved by the City Manager, shall be authorized to view video monitoring equipment, and shall only examine public areas and activities where no reasonable expectation of privacy exists. ATTACHMENT 1 115 Page 2 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 02‐23‐2021) SPECIFIC POLICIES A. The La Quinta Police and City staff shall comply with all Federal and California State law applicable to the use of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in public places. B. The technology will not be used to replace current policing techniques. C. Under no circumstances shall the PSCS be used for the purpose of infringing upon First Amendment and/or Fourth Amendment rights. D. Operators of the PSCS shall not target/observe individuals based solely on their race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability or other classifications protected by law. E. The La Quinta Police Department and City of La Quinta shall not use audio in conjunction with the PSCS unless appropriate court orders and/or warrants are obtained. F. When a residential property is clearly, and knowingly in alignment with the PSCS’s line of sight, black-out technology will be applied for privacy reasons to eliminate potential unintended intrusions. G. When property of a neighboring city or unincorporated area of the county is in alignment with the PSCS’s line of sight, black-out technology will be applied, unless the neighboring city or county, as applicable, agrees to allow use of the cameras on their property. RECORDING AND USE The cameras shall only record images and not sound. Recorded images may be used for a variety of purposes, including criminal investigations and monitoring of activity of high-value or high-threat areas. The PSCS may be useful for the following purposes: A. To deter and identify criminal activity. B. To target identified areas of gang and narcotics complaints or activity. C. To respond to incidents. D. To assist in identifying, apprehending, and prosecuting offenders. E. To document officer and offender conduct during interactions to safeguard the rights of the public and officers. F. To augment resources in a cost-effective manner. G. To monitor pedestrian and vehicle traffic activity. Images from each camera shall be recorded in a manner consistent with the underlying purpose of the particular camera. Images shall be transmitted to monitors installed in a location approved by the City Manager or authorized designee. When activity warranting further investigation is reported or detected at any camera location, the available information shall be provided 116 Page 3 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 02‐23‐2021) or made available to responding officers in a timely manner. The City Manager or authorized designee may approve video feeds from the PSCS to be viewed by police, fire, emergency management, public safety, or traffic management. Viewing by other staff or outside agencies will require authorization, including supervision by city staff. Unauthorized recording, viewing, reproduction, dissemination, or retention is prohibited. CAMERA NOTIFICATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH It is the City’s commitment to provide ample notification and public outreach with the PSCS. Signs will be placed in various locations notifying the public that a public safety camera system will be monitoring driving and pedestrian activities in public places. A map of all locations with cameras will be posted on the city website. Additionally, the City will provide regular updates and receive input from the public on the PSCS. INTEGRATION WITH OTHER TECHNOLOGY The Police Department and/or City of La Quinta may decide to integrate its PSCS with other technology to enhance available information. Systems such as gunshot detection, incident mapping, crime analysis, license plate recognition, facial recognition, audio, and other video-based analytical systems may be considered based upon availability and the nature of Police Department strategy. Those additional technologies and addition of new equipment shall be approved by no less than by 4/5 majority vote by City Council. Such approval by the Council will include at least one study session and one public hearing before the technology is added. VIDEO SUPERVISION The authorized designee shall oversee video monitoring access and usage to ensure members are within City of La Quinta and/or contract public safety personnel policy and applicable laws. The City Manager or authorized designee shall ensure such use and access is appropriately documented. VIDEO LOG A log shall be maintained at the designated video monitoring center. The log shall be used to document City personnel (La Quinta Police, La Quinta Fire, City staff, and vendors as approved by the City Manager) viewing or monitoring images provided by the PSCS. The logs at a minimum should record the: A. Date and time access was given. B. Name and agency of the person being provided access to the images. 117 Page 4 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 02‐23‐2021) C. Name of person authorizing access. D. Identifiable portion of images viewed. The log shall record a request for, and shall record the transmittal of, any images to law enforcement or other public agency requested or required for evidentiary purposes. “For evidentiary purposes” or “for evidence” means for the purpose(s) of an official investigation, claim, or other legal proceeding, either criminal or civil, conducted by a law enforcement or other public agency with authority for such purpose, including in response to a warrant, subpoena, or a court order. STORAGE AND RETENTION OF MEDIA All captured images that are downloaded to media shall be stored on a dedicated server in a secured area at a City of La Quinta facility with access restricted to authorized persons. A recording of images downloaded to media that is requested or required for evidentiary purposes shall be copied to a suitable medium and documented in the official log (above). The recording needed for evidentiary purposes shall be transmitted to law enforcement or other public agency and should be safely secured in accordance with that law enforcement or other public agency’s official policies and procedures for the retention of evidence. All actions taken by City personnel with respect to retention of media shall be appropriately documented. A checks and balance has been established where the recordings have limited built in authorizations for deletion of material at the Manager and Director level. Documentation of a reason for deletion is required in writing and is submitted from Supervisor level to the Manager, Director and City Manager level for authorization. The type of video monitoring technology employed and the manner in which recordings are used and stored by the City may affect retention periods. The recordings shall be stored and retained by the City at City facilities in accordance with the established records retention schedule for a minimum of one year, or such longer period as may be established by state law. Prior to destruction, written consent shall be obtained as in the ordinary course for destruction of City documents or records, before images that are downloaded to media stored on a dedicated server in a secured area at a City facility will be deleted or destroyed. If the City has stored images that are recordings for evidentiary purposes in any claim filed or any pending criminal or civil proceeding, they will be preserved until pending litigation is resolved (Government Code § 34090.6). EVIDENTIARY INTEGRITY All downloaded and retained media shall be treated in the same manner as 118 Page 5 Public Safety Camera System Policies & Procedures (Last Revision 02‐23‐2021) other evidence. Media shall be accessed, maintained, stored and retrieved in a manner that ensures its integrity as evidence, including strict adherence to chain of custody requirements. Electronic trails, including encryption, digital masking of innocent or uninvolved individuals to preserve anonymity, authenticity certificates and date and time stamping, shall be used as appropriate to preserve individual rights and to ensure the authenticity and maintenance of a secure evidentiary chain of custody. RELEASE OF VIDEO IMAGES All recorded video images gathered by the PSCS are for the official use of the City of La Quinta and its authorized agencies. Requests for recorded video images from the public or the media shall be processed in the same manner as requests for City public records consistent with the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.). TRAINING All staff members authorized to operate or access PSCS shall receive appropriate training on an annual basis. Training shall include guidance on the use of cameras, and a review regarding relevant policies and procedures, including this policy. Training shall also address state and federal law related to the use of video monitoring equipment and privacy. VIDEO MONITORING AUDIT The City Manager or other authorized designee will conduct an annual review of the PSCS. The review shall include: A. Analysis of the cost, benefit and effectiveness of the system. B. Any public safety issues that were effectively addressed. C. Any significant prosecutions that resulted. D. Any systemic operational or administrative issues that were identified, including those related to training, discipline or policy. E. Retention of Longitudinal Data to be able to evaluate trends, costs, apprehensions, on a long-term basis. The results of each review shall be appropriately documented and maintained by the City Manager or authorized designee and other applicable advisory bodies. Any recommendations for training or policy should be promptly and reasonably addressed. VIOLATIONS OF POLICY The City has zero tolerance for any violation of these policies. Should a violation occur, the City will take appropriate action per the City of La Quinta Personnel Policies or applicable state/federal law. 119 120 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 25, 2021: INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS RECOMMENDATION A. Move to take up Ordinance No. ___ by title and number only and waive further reading. B. Move to introduce at first reading, Ordinance No. ____to amend chapter 3.25 of the Municipal Code relating to Short-Term Vacation Rentals. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At special meetings held January 27, 2021 and February 25, 2021, Council heard public comments, reviewed the Short-Term Vacation Rental Program (STVR) Ad-Hoc Committee (Committee) recommendations, recommendations from Neighbors for Neighborhoods (N4N), and additional data presented by staff. Council provided further direction on code amendments relating to STVR permitting and operational standards, and continued this item to this meeting. FISCAL IMPACT At the February 27 special meeting, a public hearing was held to consider a cost of service analysis to update and establish fees for the different types of STVR permits; consideration of this was continued to March 2, 2021. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the January 27, 2021 and February 25, 2021 special meetings, Council heard public comments, reviewed the Short-Term Vacation Rental Program (STVR) Ad- Hoc Committee (Committee) recommendations, recommendations from Neighbors for Neighborhoods (N4N), and additional data presented by staff. BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 121 Council provided direction on code amendments relating to STVR permitting and operational standards. The items below provide a general summary of the proposed code amendments to Chapter 3.25: General STVR permit General STVR permit is a type of STVR rental permit that is neither a homeshare STVR permit nor a primary residence STVR permit. This type of STVR permit would be for an owner’s second home or investment property used as a STVR unit. Primary Residence STVR Permit Primary residence STVR permit is a type of STVR permit whereby the dwelling is the owner’s primary residence. Primary residence means a dwelling where an owner spends the majority of the calendar year on the property used as a STVR, and the property is identified in the Riverside County Assessor’s record as the owner’s primary residence. Homeshare STVR Permit Homeshare STVR permit is a type of STVR permit whereby the owner hosts visitors in the owner’s home, for compensation, while the owner lives on- site and in the home, throughout the visitor’s stay. Estate home (5+ bedrooms or more) An Estate Home is sub-type to any of the three (3) STVR permit types listed above; and is defined as a single-family detached residence with five (5) or more bedrooms, subject to meeting evaluation criteria regarding adequate on-site parking and available street parking, potential noise impacts, and sufficient physical distance from adjacent properties, i.e., outdoor gathering spaces, pools, and other living spaces, to ensure that the STVR will not create conditions detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. Inspection of the property to evaluate the above criteria and to verify the number of bedrooms is required. Installation of noise monitoring devices is also required. Two-strikes policy The three-strikes policy is changed to a two-strikes policy for violations. A violation may not count towards a strike if it is a first-time violation that has minimal impact on the use and enjoyment of adjacent and nearby properties such as trash or debris left in view, permit number and bedroom count not posted or in the wrong location in an advertisement, and overoccupancy due to a minor (child) and not associated with a noise disturbance. A minor violation reprieve may be requested by a STVR owner by written request to the city’s code enforcement officer for relief from counting one or more violations within the one-year period as a minor violation. 122 Council expressed general support for requiring a contract agreement between the owner and renter acknowledging the City’s STVR regulations. Staff is preparing this requirement as part of the permitting process, including updating the good neighbor brochure which will include this requirement. Pursuant to the discussion during the February 25, 2021 special meeting, general consensus was expressed at this time not to pursue imposing limitations to bookings for STVRs, requiring security deposit from renters, or limiting the number of STVR permits per individual owner. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to adopt some of the changes; instruct Staff to make additional/different amendments; and/or amend certain sections of these chapters of the Code. Prepared by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 123 124 ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT TERM VACATION RENTALS WHEREAS, Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) relates to short-term vacation rentals; and WHEREAS, the City has the authority to regulate businesses operating within the City; and WHEREAS, Chapter 3.25 of the LQMC addresses permitted uses, short- term vacation rental process and permitting procedures; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are necessary to clarify regulations, process, and standards for short-term vacation rentals under the City’s short-term vacation rental program, as more particularly set forth in this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 3.25 shall be amended as written in "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Corrective Amendments: The City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to "Exhibit A" to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 3. Posting: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 5. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, 125 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 2 of 18 held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this ____ day of ____________, 2021 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney 126 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 3 of 18 City of La Quinta, California Chapter 3.25 SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS Chapter 3.25 SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS 3.25.010 Title. This chapter shall be referred to as the “Short-Term Vacation Rental Regulations.” (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.020 Purpose. A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish regulations for the use of privately owned residential dwellings as short-term vacation rentals that ensure the collection and payment of transient occupancy taxes (TOT) as provided in Chapter 3.24 of this code, and minimize the negative secondary effects of such use on surrounding residential neighborhoods. B. This chapter is not intended to provide any owner of residential property with the right or privilege to violate any private conditions, covenants and restrictions applicable to the owner’s property that may prohibit the use of such owner’s residential property for short-term vacation rental purposes as defined in this chapter. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) C. The requirements of this chapter shall be presumed to apply to any residential dwelling that has received a short-term vacation rental permit. A rebuttable presumption arises that, whenever there is an occupant(s), paying rent or not, of a residential dwelling that has received a short-term vacation rental permit, the requirements of this chapter shall apply, including but not limited to any suspension or other modifications imposed on a short-term vacation rental permit as set forth in this chapter. The city manager or authorized designee shall have the authority to implement any necessary or appropriate policies and procedures to implement the rebuttable presumption set forth in this section. 3.25.030 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning respectively ascribed to them by this section: “Advertise,” “advertisement,” “advertising,” “publish,” and “publication” mean any and all means, whether verbal or written, through any media whatsoever whether in use prior to, at the time of, or after the enactment of the ordinance amending this chapter, used for conveying to any member or members of the public the ability or availability to rent a short-term vacation rental unit as defined in this section, or used for conveying to any member or members of the public a notice of an intention to rent a short-term vacation rental unit as defined in this section. For purposes of this definition, the following media are listed as examples, which are not and shall not be construed as exhaustive: Verbal or written announcements by proclamation or outcry, newspaper advertisement, magazine advertisement, handbill, written or printed notice, printed or poster display, billboard display, e-mail or other electronic/digital messaging platform, electronic commerce/commercial Internet websites, and any and all other electronic media, television, radio, satellite-based, or Internet website. EXHIBIT A 127 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 4 of 18 “Applicable laws, rules and regulations” means any laws, rules, regulations and codes (whether local, state or federal) pertaining to the use and occupancy of a privately owned dwelling unit as a short- term vacation rental. “Applicant” means the owner of the short-term vacation rental unit. “Authorized agent or representative” means a designated agent or representative who is appointed by the owner and also is responsible for compliance with this chapter with respect to the short-term vacation rental unit. “Booking transaction” means any reservation or payment service provided by a person or entity who facilitates a home-sharing or vacation rental (including short-term vacation rental) transaction between a prospective occupant and an owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative. “City manager” means that person acting in the capacity of the city manager of the city of La Quinta or authorized designee. “Declaration of non-use” means the declaration described in Section 3.25.050. “Dwelling” has the same meaning as set forth in Section 9.280.030 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code; “dwelling” does not include any impermanent, transitory, or mobile means of temporary lodging, including but not limited to mobile homes, recreational vehicles (RVs), car trailers, and camping tents. “Estate home” is defined as a single-family detached residence with five (5) or more bedrooms, subject to evaluation criteria and inspection of the property pursuant to Section 3.25.060(D). An estate home is a sub-type of short-term vacation rental unit and shall be subject to a general short-term vacation rental permit, primary residence short-term vacation rental permit, or homeshare short-term vacation rental permit, as applicable, pursuant to this chapter. “General short-term vacation rental permit” is a type of short-term vacation rental permit that is neither a homeshare short-term vacation rental permit nor a primary residence short-term vacation rental permit. “Good neighbor brochure” means a document prepared by the city that summarizes the general rules of conduct, consideration, and respect, including, without limitation, provisions of this code and other applicable laws, rules or regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of short-term vacation rental units. “Homeshare short-term vacation rental permit” is a type of short-term vacation rental permit whereby the Owner hosts visitors in the Owner’s dwelling, for compensation, for periods of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, while the Owner lives on-site and in the dwelling, throughout the visiting occupant’s stay. “Hosting platform” means a person or entity who participates in the home-sharing or vacation rental (including short-term vacation rental) business by collecting or receiving a fee, directly or indirectly through an agent or intermediary, for conducting a booking transaction using any medium of facilitation, including but not limited to the Internet. “Local contact person” means the person designated by the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative who shall be available twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week with the ability to respond to the location within forty-five minutes for the purpose of: (1) taking remedial action to resolve any such complaints; and (2) responding to complaints regarding the condition, operation, or 128 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 5 of 18 conduct of occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit. A designated local contact person must obtain a business license otherwise required by Sections 3.24.060 and 3.28.020 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. “Notice of permit modification, suspension or revocation” means the notice the city may issue to an applicant, authorized agent or representative, local contact person, occupant, owner, responsible person, or any other person or entity authorized to be issued such notice under this code for a short- term vacation rental unit, upon a determination by the city of a violation of this chapter or other provisions of this code relating to authorized uses of property subject to this chapter. “Occupant” means any person(s) occupying the dwelling at any time. “Owner” means the person(s) or entity(ies) that hold(s) legal and/or equitable title to the subject short- term vacation rental. “Primary residence” means a dwelling where an Owner spends the majority of the calendar year on the property used as a short-term vacation rental unit, and the property is identified in the Riverside County Assessor’s record as the Owner’s primary residence. “Primary residence short-term vacation rental permit” is a type of short-term vacation rental permit whereby the short-term vacation rental unit is the Owner’s primary residence, as defined herein in this section. “Property” means a residential legal lot of record on which a short-term vacation rental unit is located. “Rent” has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3.24.020 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. “Rental agreement” means a written or verbal agreement for use and occupancy of a privately-owned residential dwelling that has been issued a short-term vacation rental permit, including a dwelling that may have a permit which has been or is under suspension. “Responsible person” means the signatory of an agreement for the rental, use and occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit, and/or any person(s) occupying the short-term vacation rental unit without a rental agreement, including the owner(s), owner’s authorized agent(s) or representative(s), local contact(s), and their guests, who shall be an occupant of that short-term vacation rental unit, who is at least twenty-one years of age, and who is legally responsible for ensuring that all occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit and/or their guests comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. “Short-term vacation rental permit” means a permit that permits the use of a privately owned residential dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, and which incorporates by consolidation a transient occupancy permit and a business license otherwise required by Sections 3.24.060 and 3.28.020 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. A short-term vacation rental permit is one of the following types: (1) General short-term vacation rental permit, (2) Primary residence short-term vacation rental permit, or (3) Homeshare short-term vacation rental permit, as defined in this section. “Short-term vacation rental unit” means a privately owned residential dwelling, such as, but not limited to, a single-family detached or multiple-family attached unit, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings and/or property and/or yard features appurtenant thereto, rented for occupancy and/or occupied for dwelling, lodging, or any transient use, 129 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 6 of 18 including but not limited to sleeping overnight purposes for a period of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days, by any person(s) with or without a rental agreement. “STVR” may be used by city officials as an abbreviation for “short-term vacation rental.” “Suspension” means that short-term vacation rental permit that is suspended pursuant to Section 3.25.090. “Tenant” or “transient,” for purposes of this chapter, means any person who seeks to rent or who does rent, or who occupies or seeks to occupy, for thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, a short- term vacation rental unit. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.040 Authorized agent or representative. A. Except for the completion of an application for a short-term vacation rental permit and business license, the owner may designate an authorized agent or representative to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter with respect to the short-term vacation rental unit on his, her or their behalf. Nevertheless, the owner shall not be relieved from any personal responsibility and personal liability for noncompliance with any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit, regardless of whether such noncompliance was committed by the owner’s authorized agent or representative or the occupants of the owner’s short-term vacation rental unit or their guests. B. The owner must be the applicant for and holder of a short-term vacation rental permit and business license and shall not authorize an agent or a representative to apply for or hold a short-term vacation rental permit and business license on the owner’s behalf. The owner’s signature is required on all short-term vacation rental application forms, and the city may prescribe reasonable requirements to verify that an applicant or purported owner is the owner in fact. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.050 Short-term vacation rental permit—Required. A. The owner is required to obtain a short-term vacation rental permit and a business license from the city before the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative may rent or advertise a short-term vacation rental unit. No short-term vacation rental use may occur in the city except in compliance with this chapter. No property in the city may be issued a short-term vacation rental permit or used as a short-term vacation rental unit unless the property is a residential dwelling that complies with the requirements of this chapter. B. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall be valid for one (1) year and renewed on an annual basis in order to remain valid. 1. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license renewal application shall be submitted no earlier than sixty (60) calendar days but no later than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the permit’s expiration date. Failure to renew a short-term vacation rental permit as prescribed in this section may result in the short-term vacation rental permit being terminated. 2. A new owner of a property (or a new person and/or new entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, 130 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 7 of 18 which is the owner of a property) previously operated as a short-term vacation rental unit by the former owner (or by a former person or entity that owned or controlled the business or organization or other entity of any kind that continues to be the owner of the property) may not renew the previous owner’s short-term vacation rental permit and shall apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit, pursuant to this chapter, if the new owner (or new person and/or new entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind that continues to be the owner of a property) wants to continue to use the residential dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit. 3. If an owner or an owner’s authorized agent or representative, pursuant to all applicable laws, constructs additional bedrooms to an existing residential dwelling or converts non-bedroom spaces and areas in an existing residential dwelling into additional bedrooms, the owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall notify the city and update the short-term vacation rental unit’s online registration profile upon city approval of the addition or conversion so that the city may confirm that such conversion is consistent with this chapter and the code, including all applicable provisions in Title 8 of the code, and reissue the short- term vacation rental permit so that it accurately identifies the number of approved bedrooms, if the owner wants to continue to use the dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit. The city may conduct an onsite inspection of the property to verify compliance with this chapter and the code. Code compliance inspections may be billed for full cost recovery at one hour for initial inspection and in thirty-minute increments for each follow-up inspection pursuant to subsection D. For purposes of this chapter, “reissue” or “reissuance” of a short-term vacation rental permit means a permit that is reissued by the city, with corrected information, as applicable, to be valid for the balance of the existing one (1)-year permit and license period. C. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall be valid only for the number of bedrooms in a residential dwelling equal to the number of bedrooms the city establishes as eligible for listing as a short-term vacation rental unit and shall not exceed the number of bedrooms allowable for the number of occupants as set forth in Section 3.25.070. The allowable number of bedrooms shall meet all applicable requirements under federal, state and city codes, including, but not limited to, the provisions of Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) governing “additional bedrooms” and all applicable building and construction codes in Title 8 of this code. A short-term vacation rental permit shall not issue for, or otherwise authorize the use of, additional bedrooms converted from non-bedroom spaces or areas in an existing residential dwelling except upon express city approval for the additional bedrooms in compliance with this code, including Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time), and upon approval of an application for a new or renewed short-term vacation rental permit as provided in subsection B. D. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if the property, or any building, structure, or use or land use on the property is in violation of this code. The city may conduct an inspection of the property prior to the issuance or renewal of a short-term vacation rental permit and/or business license. Code compliance inspections may be billed for full cost recovery at one hour for initial inspection and in thirty-minute increments for each follow-up inspection. For purposes of this subsection, a code violation exists if, at the time of the submittal of an application for a new or renewed short-term 131 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 8 of 18 vacation rental permit or business license, the city has commenced administrative proceedings by issuing written communication and/or official notice to the owner or owner’s responsible agent or representative of one or more code violations. For purposes of this chapter, “building,” “structure,” and “use or land use” have the same meanings as set forth in Section 9.280.030 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. E. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if any portion of transient occupancy tax has not been reported and/or remitted to the city for the previous calendar year by the applicable deadline for the reporting and/or remittance of the transient occupancy tax. F. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if the residential dwelling to be used as a short-term rental unit lacks adequate onsite parking. For purposes of this subsection, “adequate onsite parking” shall be determined by dividing the total number of occupants commensurate with the approved number of bedrooms as provided in the table under Section 3.25.070 by four, such that the ratio of the total number of occupants to onsite parking spots does not exceed four to one (4:1). For example, a residential dwelling with five bedrooms may permissibly host a total number of ten occupants and therefore requires three on-site parking spots. Onsite parking shall be on an approved driveway, garage, and/or carport areas only in accordance with Section 3.25.070(R), and no more than two street parking spots may count towards the number of on-site parking spots necessary to meet the “adequate onsite parking” requirement under this subsection. G. An owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative who claims not to be operating a short- term vacation rental unit or who has obtained a valid short-term vacation rental permit and business license pursuant to this chapter, may voluntarily opt-out of the requirements of this chapter, prior to the issuance or expiration of a short-term vacation rental permit and business license that are applicable to the short-term vacation rental unit, only upon the owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person executing, under penalty of perjury, a declaration of non-use as a short-term vacation rental unit, in a form prescribed by the city (for purposes of this chapter, a “declaration of non-use”). Upon the receipt and filing by the city of a fully executed declaration of non-use, the owner or owner’s authorized agent representative shall be released from complying with this chapter as long as the property is not used as a short-term vacation rental unit. Use of the property as a short-term vacation unit after the city’s receipt and filing of a declaration of non-use, is a violation of this chapter. If, after a declaration of non-use has been received and filed by the city, the owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative wants to use that property as a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner shall apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit and business license and fully comply with the requirements of this chapter and the code; provided, however, that if a short-term vacation rental permit is or will be suspended on the date an owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative submits to the city a declaration of non-use for the short-term vacation rental unit under suspension, then the owner may apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit and business license only after twelve (12) consecutive months have elapsed from the date of the declaration of non-use, and the owner and owner’s authorized agent or representative otherwise shall fully comply with the requirements of this chapter and the code. (Ord. 577 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 132 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 9 of 18 3.25.060 Short-term vacation rental permit—Application requirements. A. The owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative must submit the information required on the city’s short-term vacation rental permit application form provided by the city, which may include any or all of the following: 1. The name, address, and telephone number of the owner of the subject short-term vacation rental unit; 2. The name, address, and telephone number of the owner’s authorized agent or representative, if any; 3. The name, address, and twenty-four-hour telephone number of the local contact person; 4. The address of the proposed short-term vacation rental unit, Internet listing site and listing number; 5. The number of bedrooms shall not exceed the number of bedrooms allowable for the number of occupants as set forth in Section 3.25.070. The allowable number of bedrooms shall meet all applicable building and construction requirements under federal, state and city codes, including, but not limited to, the provisions of Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) governing “additional bedrooms” and all applicable building and construction codes in Title 8 of this code; 6. Acknowledgement of receipt of all electronically distributed short-term vacation rental information from the city, including any good neighbor brochure; 7. The owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative who has applied for a short-term vacation rental permit shall provide the city with written authorization that issuance of a short- term vacation rental permit pursuant to this chapter is not inconsistent with any recorded or unrecorded restrictive covenant, document, or other policy of a homeowner association (HOA) or other person or entity which has governing authority over the property on which a short-term vacation rental unit will be operated; in furtherance of this requirement, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that an owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative does not have written authorization for the issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit if a HOA or other person or entity which has governing authority over the property has submitted to the city a duly-authorized official writing, which informs the city that short-term vacation rentals of thirty (30) consecutive days or less are not permitted on the property applying for a short-term vacation rental permit; and 8. Such other information as the city manager or authorized designee deems reasonably necessary to administer this chapter. B. The short-term vacation rental permit application shall be accompanied by an application fee as set by resolution of the city council. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed while any check or other payment method cannot be processed for insufficient funds. C. The city may determine the maximum number of bedrooms in a residential dwelling with multiple bedrooms eligible for use as a short-term vacation rental unit upon issuance of a short-term vacation 133 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 10 of 18 rental permit. When determining the maximum number of bedrooms eligible for use as short-term vacation rentals, the city shall consider the public health, safety, and welfare, shall comply with building and residential codes, and may rely on public records relating to planned and approved living space within the residential dwellings, including, but not limited to, title insurance reports, official county records, and tax assessor records. Owners of residential dwellings that exceed five thousand square feet of developed space on a lot may apply for additional bedrooms. An owner and/or owner’s authorized agent or representative may not advertise availability for occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit for more than the approved number of bedrooms listed in the short-term vacation rental permit issued by the city pursuant to this chapter. In addition to any other rights and remedies available to the city under this chapter, the first violation for failing to advertise the approved number of bedrooms may be subject to a fine by an administrative citation, and a second or subsequent violation for failing to advertise the approved number of bedrooms may result in a revocation (which may include permanent revocation) of the short-term vacation rental permit and/or any affiliated licenses or permits pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 3.25.100. D. Short-term vacation rental permit applications shall comply with the following: 1. A short-term vacation rental permit application for the Estate home shall be subject to evaluation and inspection of the property to ensure that the short-term vacation rental unit will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties in the vicinity. Evaluation and inspection shall include, but not be limited to: verification of the number of bedrooms, adequate on-site parking spaces, availability of nearby street parking, physical distance of the Estate home from adjacent properties, such as location and distance of outdoor gathering spaces, pools, and other living spaces from neighboring properties. The city manager, or designee, shall have the authority to impose additional conditions on the use of the Estate home as a short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential secondary effects unique to the subject short-term vacation rental unit are avoided or adequately mitigated. 2. A short-term vacation rental permit application may be denied if the applicant has failed to comply with application requirements in this chapter, or has had a prior short-term vacation rental permit for the same unit revoked within the past twelve (12) calendar months. In addition, upon adoption of a resolution pursuant to subsection H, the city may limit the number of short-term vacation rental units in a given geographic area based on a high concentration of short-term vacation rental units. The city shall maintain a waiting list of short-term vacation rental permit applications for such geographic areas where the city determines, based on substantial evidence after a noticed public hearing and public hearing, there is a higher than average concentration of short-term vacation rental units that either affects the public health, safety, and welfare or significantly negatively impacts the character and standard of living in a neighborhood within that geographic area, or both. E. Short-term vacation rental permit applications may take up to, and the city shall have, thirty (30) calendar days to process. An application for a renewal of a short-term vacation rental permit and business license should be submitted at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the existing permit’s expiration to allow sufficient time for the city to process the renewal application. Nothing in this subsection or chapter shall be construed as requiring the city to issue or deny a short-term vacation rental permit in less than thirty (30) calendar days, as no permit shall be issued until such time as application review is complete. No short-term vacation rental use may occur in the city without a valid short-term vacation rental permit is issued in accordance with this chapter. 134 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 11 of 18 F. Upon a change of ownership of a property (or upon a new person and/or new entity owning or controlling a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner of a property) licensed to operate as a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall notify the city of such change immediately. The existing short-term vacation rental permit shall be terminated and the property must cease operating as a short-term vacation rental immediately. Failure to comply may result in a fine of $1,000 per day for a continuing violation of this subsection F. G. Immediately upon a change of an owner’s authorized agent or representative, local contact, or any other change pertaining to the information contained in the short-term vacation rental application, the owner or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall update the short-term vacation rental unit’s online registration profile used by the city for the implementation of the short-term vacation rental regulations. Failure to update immediately this information may result in a violation of this chapter, including but not limited to a suspension or revocation of a short-term vacation rental permit, until all information is updated. H. The city manager or authorized designee shall prepare, for adoption by resolution by the city council, a review procedure and criteria to evaluate the limitation for issuance of STVR permits and/or STVR applications for geographic areas within the city as set forth in subsection D. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.070 Operational requirements and standard conditions. A. The owner and/or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the short-term vacation rental unit is used in a manner that complies with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short- term vacation rental unit. 1. An Estate home may be established for short-term vacation rental use subject to evaluation and inspection of the property pursuant to Section 3.25.060(D). 2. An Estate home established for short-term vacation rental use is required to be equipped with a noise monitoring device(s) that is operable at all times. B. The responsible person(s) shall be an occupant(s) of the short-term vacation rental unit for which he, she or they signed a rental agreement for such rental, use and occupancy, and/or any person(s) occupying the short-term vacation rental unit without a rental agreement, including the owner, owner’s authorized agent or representative, local contact(s) and their guests. No non-permanent improvements to the property, such as tents, trailers, or other mobile units, may be used as short-term vacation rentals. The total number of occupants, including the responsible person(s), allowed to occupy any given short-term vacation rental unit may be within the ranges set forth in the table below. By the issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit, the city or its authorized designees, including police, shall have the right to conduct a count of all persons occupying the short-term vacation rental unit in response to a complaint or any other legal grounds to conduct an inspection resulting from the use of the short-term vacation rental unit, and the failure to allow the city or its authorized designees the ability to conduct such a count may constitute a violation of this chapter. The city council may by resolution further restrict occupancy levels provided those restrictions are within the occupancy ranges set forth below. 135 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 12 of 18 Number of Bedrooms Total of Overnight* Occupants Total Daytime** Occupants (Including Number of Overnight Occupants) 0 – Studio 2 2—8 1 2—4 2—8 2 4—6 4—8 3 6—8 6—12 4 8—10 8—16 5 10—12 10—18 6 12—14 12—20 7 14 14—20 8 16 16—22 9 18 18—24 * Overnight (10:01 p.m. – 6:59 a.m.) ** Daytime (7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.) C. The person(s) listed as the local contact person in the short-term vacation rental unit’s online registration profile shall be available twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week, with the ability to respond to the location within thirty (30) minutes to complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit or their guests. The person(s) listed as a local contact person shall be able to respond personally to the location, or to contact the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative to respond personally to the location, within thirty (30) minutes of notification or attempted notification by the city or its authorized short-term vacation rental designated hotline service provider. No provision in this section shall obligate the city or its authorized short-term vacation rental designated hotline service provider to attempt to contact any person or entity other than the person(s) listed as the local contact person. D. The owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the occupants and/or guests of the short-term vacation rental unit do not create unreasonable or unlawful noise or disturbances, engage in disorderly conduct, or violate any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. E. Occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit shall comply with the standards and regulations for allowable noise at the property in accordance with Section 9.100.210 and 11.08.040 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. No radio receiver, musical instrument, phonograph, compact disk player, loudspeaker, karaoke machine, sound amplifier, or any machine, device or equipment that produces or reproduces any sound shall be used outside or be audible from the outside of any short-term vacation rental unit between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time. Observations of noise related violations shall be made by the city or its authorized designee from any location at which a city official or authorized designee may lawfully be, including 136 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 13 of 18 but not limited to any public right-of-way, any city-owned public property, and any private property to which the city or its authorized designee has been granted access. F. Prior to occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall: 1. Obtain the contact information of the responsible person; 2. Provide copies of all electronically distributed short-term vacation rental information from the city, including any good neighbor brochure to the responsible person and post in a conspicuous location within the short-term vacation rental unit, in a manner that allows for the information to be viewed in its entirety; and require such responsible person to execute a formal acknowledgement that he or she is legally responsible for compliance by all occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit and their guests with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the short-term vacation rental unit. This information shall be maintained by the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative for a period of three years and be made readily available upon request of any officer of the city responsible for the enforcement of any provision of this code or any other applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the short-term vacation rental unit. G. The owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person shall, upon notification or attempted notification that the responsible person and/or any occupant and/or guest of the short-term vacation rental unit has created unreasonable or unlawful noise or disturbances, engaged in disorderly conduct, or committed violations of any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit, promptly respond within thirty (30) minutes to immediately halt and prevent a recurrence of such conduct by the responsible person and/or any occupants and/or guests. Failure of the owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person to respond to calls or complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants and/or guests of the short-term vacation rental unit within thirty (30) minutes, shall be subject to all administrative, legal and equitable remedies available to the city. H. [reserved] I. Trash and refuse shall not be left stored within public view, except in proper containers for the purpose of collection by the city’s authorized waste hauler on scheduled trash collection days. The owner, the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure compliance with all the provisions of Chapter 6.04 (Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. J. Signs may be posted on the premises to advertise the availability of the short-term vacation rental unit as provided for in Chapter 9.160 (Signs) (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. K. The owner, authorized agent or representative and/or the owner’s designated local contact person shall post a copy of the short-term vacation rental permit and a copy of the good neighbor brochure in a conspicuous place within the short-term vacation rental unit, and a copy of the good neighbor brochure shall be provided to each occupant of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. L. Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, the owner and/or the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall comply with all provisions of Chapter 3.24 concerning transient occupancy taxes, 137 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 14 of 18 including, but not limited to, submission of a monthly return in accordance with Section 3.24.080 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, which shall be filed monthly even if the short-term vacation rental unit was not rented during each such month. M. Guesthouses, detached from the primary residential dwelling on the property, or the primary residential dwelling on the property, may be rented pursuant to this chapter as long as the guesthouse and the primary residential dwelling are rented to one party. N. The owner and/or the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall post the number of authorized bedrooms and the current short-term vacation rental permit number at the beginning or top of any advertisement that promotes the availability or existence of a short-term vacation rental unit. In the instance of audio-only advertising of the same, the short-term vacation rental permit number shall be read as part of the advertisement. O. The owner and/or owner’s authorized agent or representative shall operate a short-term vacation rental unit in compliance with any other permits or licenses that apply to the property, including, but not limited to, any permit or license needed to operate a special event pursuant to Section 9.60.170 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. The city may limit the number of special event permits issued per year on residential dwellings pursuant to Section 9.60.170 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time). P. The city manager, or designee, shall have the authority to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential secondary effects unique to the subject short-term vacation rental unit are avoided or adequately mitigated, including, but not limited to, a mitigating condition that would require the installation of a noise monitoring device to keep time-stamped noise level data from the property that will be made available to the city upon city’s reasonable request. Q. The standard conditions set forth herein may be modified by the city manager, or designee, upon request of the owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative based on site-specific circumstances for the purpose of allowing reasonable accommodation of a short-term vacation rental. All requests must be in writing and shall identify how the strict application of the standard conditions creates an unreasonable hardship to a property such that, if the requirement is not modified, reasonable use of the property for a short-term vacation rental would not be allowed. Any hardships identified must relate to physical constraints to the subject site and shall not be self-induced or economic. Any modifications of the standard conditions shall not further exacerbate an already existing problem. R. On-site parking shall be on an approved driveway, garage, and/or carport areas only; this section does not impose restrictions on public street parking regulations. Recreational vehicles may be parked in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 9.60.130 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. (Ord. 577 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.080 Recordkeeping and hosting platform duties. A. The owner or the owner’s authorized agent or representative shall maintain for a period of three years, records in such form as the tax administrator (as defined in Chapter 3.24) may require to determine the amount of transient occupancy tax owed to the city. The tax administrator shall have the right to inspect such records at all reasonable times, which may be subject to the 138 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 15 of 18 subpoena by the tax administrator pursuant to Section 3.24.140 (Records) (Transient Occupancy Tax) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. B. Hosting platforms shall not complete any booking transaction for any residential dwelling or other property purporting to be a short-term vacation rental unit in the city unless the dwelling or property has a current and valid short-term vacation rental permit issued pursuant to this chapter, which is not under suspension, for the dates and times proposed as part of the booking transaction. 1. The city shall maintain an online registry of active and suspended short-term vacation rental permits, which hosting platforms may reference and rely upon for purposes of complying with subsection B. If a residential dwelling or other property purporting to be a short-term vacation rental unit matches with an address, permit number, and/or current and valid permit dates (not under suspension) set forth in the city’s online registry, the hosting platforms may presume that the dwelling or other property has a current and valid short-term vacation rental permit. 2. The provisions of this subsection B shall be interpreted in accordance with otherwise applicable state and federal law(s) and will not apply if determined by the city to be in violation of, or preempted by, any such law(s). (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.090 Violations. A. Additional Conditions. A violation of any provision of this chapter or this code by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner’s authorized agent or representative, shall authorize the city manager, or designee, to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential additional violations are avoided. B. Permit Modification, Suspension and Revocation. A violation of any provision of this chapter, this code, California Vehicle Code, or any other applicable federal, state, or local laws or codes, including, but not limited to, applicable fire codes and the building and construction codes as set forth in Title 8 of this code, by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner’s authorized agent or representative, shall constitute grounds for modification, suspension and/or revocation (which may include permanent revocation) of the short-term vacation rental permit and/or any affiliated licenses or permits pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 3.25.100. C. Notice of Violation. The city may issue a notice of violation to any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, owner’s authorized agent or representative, or hosting platform, pursuant to Section 1.01.300 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. D. ThreeTwo (2) Strikes Policy. ThreeSubject to a minor violation reprieve request, two (2) violations of any provision of this chapter or this code within one (1) year by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner’s authorized agent or representative, with respect to any one residential dwelling willshall result in an immediate suspension of the short-term vacation rental permit with subsequent ability to have a hearing before the city, pursuant to this chapter, to request a lifting of the suspension. For purposes of this subsection, a “minor violation reprieve request” means 139 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 16 of 18 a written request submitted to the city’s code enforcement officer for relief from counting one (1) or more violations within the one (1) year period as a minor violation, and “minor violation” means a violation of a particular section of this code that resulted in minimal impact on the use and enjoyment of the adjacent and nearby properties caused by any of the following: (1) Minor debris or trash containers left in view as a first offense; (2) A short-term vacation rental permit number or bedroom count not posted on an advertisement as a first offense; (3) A short-term vacation rental permit number or bedroom count posted in the wrong location on an advertisement as a first offense, or (4) Over occupancy due to a minor child not associated with a disturbance. A determination of whether a code violation is a minor violation shall be based on substantial evidence presented to the code enforcement officer relating to that violation. E. Administrative and Misdemeanor Citations. The city may issue an administrative citation to any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, owner’s authorized agent or representative, or hosting platform, pursuant to Chapter 1.09 (Administrative Citations) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. Nothing in this section shall preclude the city from also issuing an infraction citation upon the occurrence of the same offense on a separate day. An administrative citation may impose a fine for one or more violations of this chapter in the maximum amount allowed by state law or this code in which the latter amount shall be as follows: 1. General STVR Violations (Occupancy/Noise/Parking). a. First violation: one thousand dollars; b. Second violation: two thousand dollars; c. Third violation: three thousand dollars. 2. Operating a STVR Without a Valid Short-Term Vacation Rental Permit. a. First violation: three thousand dollars; b. Second or more violations: five thousand dollars; c. In addition to the fine set forth above, the first violation of operating a STVR without a valid short-term vacation rental permit shall be cause for an owner (or person and/or entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner of a property) to be prohibited for all time from being eligible to be issued a short-term vacation rental permit and/or business license for use of a property as a short-term vacation rental unit. 3. Hosting a Special Event at a STVR Without a Special Event Permit as Required by Section 9.60.170 (or Successor Provision, as May Be Amended From Time to Time) of This Code. a. First violation: five thousand dollars; b. Second violation: five thousand dollars. 140 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 17 of 18 F. Public Nuisance. In addition to any and all rights and remedies available to the city, it shall be a public nuisance for any person or entity to commit, cause or maintain a violation of this chapter, which shall be subject to the provisions of Section 1.01.250 (Violations public nuisances) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. (Ord. 578 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.100 Appeals. A. Any person aggrieved by any decision of a city officer made pursuant to this chapter may request a hearing before the city manager in accordance with Chapter 2.08 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. B. Notwithstanding any provisions in Section 2.08.230 or otherwise in the code, the decision by the city manager of an appeal brought under this chapter shall be the final decision by the city for any violation of a short-term vacation rental permit issued under this order, except for any administrative citation imposing a fine, which shall be processed and subject to an administrative appeal pursuant to Chapter 1.09 of the code. (Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017) 141 Ordinance No. XXX Amendments to Chapter 3.25 Short-Term Vacation Rentals Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 18 of 18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. XXX which was introduced at a regular meeting on the ___ day of ________, 2021, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the ____ day of ________, 2021, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2015-023. _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on __________ ___, 2021, pursuant to Council Resolution. _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 142 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 25, 2021: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CITY’S SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM PERMIT FEES RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution to amend the City’s Short-Term Vacation Rental Program Permit Fees. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On a recurring basis, staff reviews existing user fees and rates as a basis for recovering allowable costs of certain City services. Due to recent revisions to the Short-Term Vacation Rental (STVR) Program rules and permit types, the City has updated the cost of permitting and regulation of STVRs and developed an updated fee schedule for City Council consideration. Council considered the proposed fees on February 25, 2021, and continued the public hearing to March 2, 2021, to allow staff an opportunity to finalize the code amendments to Chapter 3.25 identifying the different STVR permit types for which the fees are being proposed. If Council adopts the proposed changes, the updated fees will be effective 60 days after adoption (May 1, 2021). FISCAL IMPACT Based on historical revenues and permit volume, the adjusted fees may generate an additional $975,000 in annual revenue. Actual revenues will vary based on permit applications received. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Staff conducts on-going reviews of user and regulatory fees. Periodically, fee adjustments are considered to improve the correlation between the City’s cost of providing services and the fees imposed to recover those costs. The current fee analysis is limited to short-term vacation rental permit fees. The current annual fee for permit issuance is $200 per year. The City has historically collected less than the City’s full cost of service for permit issuance. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 143 The proposed fees will be based on permit type and number of bedrooms. The fee scale corresponds with the varying levels of effort required to permit and regulate the different types of STVRs permitted by the City. Under the proposed fee structure, the City will continue to collect less than the City’s full cost of permitting and regulation, however cost recovery will be significantly improved. The cost of service analysis to identify proposed cost recovery levels, is included as an attachment to this report. The proposed fees are in-line with fees collected by other agencies for similar permits: Agency Permit Fee Indian Wells $159 (Current) ‐ La Quinta $200 Desert Hot Springs $230 Palm Springs ‐ Homeshare $236 (Proposed) La Quinta ‐ Homeshare STVR Permit (Less than 5 Bedrooms)$250 (Proposed) La Quinta ‐ Homeshare STVR Permit (5 Bedrooms or More)$500 (Proposed) La Quinta ‐ Primary Residence STVR Permit (Less than 5 Bedrooms)$750 (Proposed) La Quinta ‐ Primary Residence STVR Permit (5 Bedrooms or More)$1,250 Palm Springs $944 (Proposed) General La Quinta ‐ STVR (Less than 5 Bedrooms)$1,000 (Proposed) General La Quinta ‐ STVR (5 Bedrooms or More)$1,750 Rancho Mirage $1,700 Cathedral City $1,950 AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Notice regarding the proposed fee changes was provided in accordance with Government Code Section 6062(a). Public Hearing notices were published in The Desert Sun on February 12 and 19, 2021. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the recommended permit fees and direct staff accordingly. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. STVR Program Cost of Service Analysis 144 RESOLUTION NO. 2021 – XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY’S SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM PERMIT FEES WHEREAS, this action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Article 18, Statutory Exemptions, Section 15273(a) Rates Tolls Fares and Charges; and WHEREAS, this public hearing to set fees was duly noticed pursuant to Government Code Section 6062(a) – Manner of Publication for new fees and increases in The Desert Sun newspaper on February 12 and 19, 2021; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a duly noticed public hearing on February 25, 2021, and continued this item to March 2, 2021; and WHEREAS, user and regulatory fees are established by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City recently completed a study to identify the cost of providing various user and regulatory fee-related services; and WHEREAS, the study examined fee-related services provided by the City, the costs reasonably borne by the City in providing those services, the beneficiaries of those services, and the revenues produced by those paying fees and charges for special services; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that providing these services is of special benefit to applicants both separate and apart from the general benefit to the public; and therefore, in the interests of fairness to the general public, the City desires to better recover the costs of providing these services from applicants who have sought or require the City's services by revising its schedule of fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the study provides adequate evidence to conclude that the revised Short-Term Vacation Rental Program Permit fees do not exceed the cost to provide the services for which the fees are charged; and 145 Resolution No. 2021 – XXX Update of User and Regulatory Fees – Short-Term Vacation Rental Program Permit Fees Adopted: March 2, 2021 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the adopted fees shall be incorporated into the City’s existing Master Fee Schedule. The existing Master Fee Schedule was adopted on July 21, 2020, via Resolution No. 2020-027. Incorporating these fees into the Master Fee Schedule will allow for the fees to be considered with future comprehensive user and regulatory fee updates. Resolution No. 2020-27 is amended as expressly provided by this resolution, but shall otherwise remain in effect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts each recital set forth above as a specific finding. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby adopts the Short-Term Vacation Rental Program permit fees and charges as set forth in attached Exhibit "A," incorporated herewith by this reference. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall become effective on March 2, 2021. The fees imposed by this Resolution shall go into effect 60 days after its adoption on May 1, 2021. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 2nd day of March, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 146 Resolution No. 2021 – XXX Update of User and Regulatory Fees – Short-Term Vacation Rental Program Permit Fees Adopted: March 2, 2021 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: ________________________ MONIKA REDEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 147 "Exhibit A" City of La Quinta MASTER FEE SCHEDULE ‐ SHORT‐TERM VACATION RENTAL PERMIT FEE Fee Charge Basis Note Short‐Term Vacation Rental Permit Fee 1 Annual Permit Fee $200 per year 2 Code Compliance Inspection Fee (if applicable)$325 per unit 1 Homeshare Short‐Term Vacation Rental Permit Homeshare STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms $250 per year [a] Homeshare STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More $500 per year 2 Primary Residence Short‐Term Vacation Rental Permit Primary Residence STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms $750 per year [a] Primary Residence STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More $1,250 per year 3 General Short‐Term Vacation Rental Permit General STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms $1,000 per year [a] General STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More $1,750 per year 4 Technology Enhancement Fee $5 per year [a] Activity Description If special inspection is required, amount will be billed hourly in half‐hour increments using the billing rate of the department providing the services. EXHIBIT A WAS REVISED TO INCLUDE A FOOTNOTE AS NOTED BY THE HIGHLIGHTED TEXT 148 User and Regulatory FeesFee‐Related Cost of Service AnalysisShort‐Term Rental Permit FeesUpdated to Reflect 2/25/2021 City Council Business Item DiscussionATTACHMENT 1149 City of La QuintaUser and Regulatory Fee StudyCalculation of Estimated Cost of Service: Short‐term Rental Permit FeeCode ComplianceAllocation of Divisional Labor to STVR ProgramDescription FTE Est. Annual Effort Associated Adjusted FTE Associated with STVR D&D ‐ Permit Tech1.00100%1.00D&D ‐ Permit Tech1.0050%0.50D&D ‐ Manager1.0060%0.60D&D ‐ Director1.0020%0.20D&D ‐ Office Asst1.0010%0.10D&D ‐ Admin Assistant 1.0025%0.25Finance ‐ Director1.005%0.05Finance ‐ Analyst1.0010%0.10Finance ‐ Accountant1.0025%0.25Finance ‐ Account Tech1.0025%0.25Code ‐ Director1.0020%0.20Code ‐ Manager1.0050%0.50Code ‐ Supervisor1.0075%0.75Code ‐ Officer II1.0095%0.95Code ‐ Officer II1.0050%0.50Code ‐ Officer II1.0050%0.50Code ‐ Officer I 1.0095%0.95Code ‐ Officer I1.0060%0.60Code ‐ Admin Tech1.0080%0.80Code ‐ Admin Asst1.0060%0.60Clerk ‐ City Clerk1.0010%0.10Clerk ‐ Mgmnt Asst1.0010%0.10Clerk ‐ Deputy City Clerk1.0010%0.10CM ‐ City Manager1.0010%0.10Marketing ‐ Manager1.005%0.05Total25.0010.10Divisional Share40%150 City of La QuintaUser and Regulatory Fee StudyCalculation of Estimated Cost of Service: Short‐term Rental Permit FeeLabor Expenditures Allocated to STVR ProgramDescriptionEst. Annual Salary and Benefits Est. Annual Effort Associated Est. Labor Costs Associated D&D ‐ Permit Tech$80,668100% $80,668D&D ‐ Permit Tech$80,66850% $40,334D&D ‐ Manager$146,34160% $87,805D&D ‐ Director$200,61320% $40,123D&D ‐ Office Asst$95,02410% $9,502D&D ‐ Admin Assistant $65,20025% $16,300Finance ‐ Director$200,5365% $10,027Finance ‐ Analyst$125,83310% $12,583Finance ‐ Accountant$116,74125% $29,185Finance ‐ Account Tech$86,05125% $21,513Code ‐ Director$200,13320% $40,027Code ‐ Manager$150,62450% $75,312Code ‐ Supervisor$118,86475% $89,148Code ‐ Officer II$105,69095% $100,406Code ‐ Officer II$97,56050% $48,780Code ‐ Officer II$127,11150% $63,556Code ‐ Officer I $81,26795% $77,203Code ‐ Officer I$81,26760% $48,760Code ‐ Admin Tech$83,28280% $66,626Code ‐ Admin Asst$65,15960% $39,096Clerk ‐ City Clerk$148,79810% $14,880Clerk ‐ Mgmnt Asst$78,59710% $7,860Clerk ‐ Deputy City Clerk$90,22810% $9,023CM ‐ City Manager$255,26910% $25,527Marketing ‐ Manager$132,3415% $6,617Total$3,013,865$1,060,859151 City of La QuintaUser and Regulatory Fee StudyCalculation of Estimated Cost of Service: Short‐term Rental Permit FeeServices and SuppliesDescription Total Adjustment Subtotal Share to STVR Share to STVR Contract Services101‐6004‐60103 Professional Services$45,000$0$45,0000%$0101‐6004‐60108 Technical$2,000$0$2,0000%$0101‐6004‐60111 Administrative Citation Service$25,000$0$25,0000%$0101‐6004‐60119 Vehicle Abatement$1,000$0$1,0000%$0101‐6004‐60120 Lot Cleaning/Gravel Program$20,000$0$20,0000%$0101‐6004‐60125 Temporary Agency Services$10,000$0$10,0000%$0101‐6004‐60194 Veterinary Service$15,000$0$15,0000%$0101‐6004‐60197 Animal Shelter Contract Services$190,000 $0$190,000 0%$0Maintenance and Operations101‐6004‐60121 Low‐Income Housing Grants$5,000$0$5,0000%$0101‐6004‐60130 Resident Assistance Program$2,000$0$2,0000%$0101‐6004‐60320 Travel & Training$3,000$0$3,00064% $1,905101‐6004‐60351 Membership Dues$600$0$60064%$381101‐6004‐60400 Office Supplies$2,200$0$2,20064% $1,397101‐6004‐60410 Printing$10,000$0$10,000 64% $6,350101‐6004‐60425 Supplies ‐ Field$2,000$0$2,00064% $1,270101‐6004‐60690 Uniforms$4,000$0$4,00064% $2,540Internal Service Charges101‐6004‐98110 Information Tech Charges$96,400$0$96,400 64% $61,214101‐6004‐98140$88,400$0$88,400 64% $56,134Hotline$15,000$0$15,000 100% $15,000Compliance Vendor (MuniRevs)$49,400$0$49,400 100% $49,400Security$42,000$0$42,000 100% $42,000Legal (30% of retainer and estimate of appeals)$0$40,000$40,000 100% $40,000Marketing$0$15,000$15,000 100% $15,000New Vendor $0$70,000$70,000 100% $70,000Training Vendor$0$10,000$10,000 100% $10,000Total$628,000$135,000$763,000$372,591Total Estimated Program Costs$1,433,450Cost OverviewDescription Total Design & Development and Finance Permitting and Accounting$348,040Code Enforcement Program Regulation (Labor / Svcs & Supplies)$1,021,504Central Service Support (e.g. City Manager, City Clerk, Marketing)$63,906Total$1,433,450152 City of La QuintaUser and Regulatory Fee StudyCalculation of Estimated Cost of Service: Short‐term Rental Permit FeeEstimated Count by Permit TypeDescription Total Homeshare10Primary Residence Short‐Term Vacation Rental Permit192General Short‐Term Vacation Rental Permit1,098Total1,300Estimated Count by Permit Type ‐ With Break‐Out by Bedroom CountDescription % Allocation Count Homeshare STVR PermitHomeshare STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms100.0%10Homeshare STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More0.0%0Primary Residence Short‐Term Vacation Rental PermitPrimary Residence STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms94.0%180Primary Residence STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More6.0%12General Short‐Term Vacation Rental PermitGeneral STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms94.4%1,037General STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More5.6%611,300153 City of La QuintaUser and Regulatory Fee StudyCalculation of Estimated Cost of Service: Short‐term Rental Permit FeeCost Weighting for Core Services (1.0 is Base Weighting)Weighting Unit EquivalentDescriptionDesign & Development Code Enforcement Central Service Design & Development Code Enforcement Central Service Total Homeshare STVR PermitHomeshare STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms1.00 0.25 0.25 10.00 2.50 2.50 15.00 Homeshare STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More2.00 0.50 0.25 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Primary Residence Short‐Term Vacation Rental PermitPrimary Residence STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms1.00 1.00 1.00 180.48 180.48 180.48 541.44 Primary Residence STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More2.00 1.50 1.00 23.04 17.28 11.52 51.84 General Short‐Term Vacation Rental PermitGeneral STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms1.00 1.50 1.00 1,037.00 1,555.50 1,037.00 3,629.50 General STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More2.00 2.50 1.00 122.00 152.50 61.00 335.50 1,372.52 1,908.26 1,292.50 4,573.28 Cost OverviewDescription Total Total Unit Equivalent Cost Per Unit Equivalent Design & Development and Finance Permitting and Accounting$348,040 1,372.52 $254Code Enforcement Program Regulation (Labor / Services & Supplies)$1,021,504 1,908.26 $535Central Service Support (e.g. City Manager, City Clerk, Marketing)$63,9061,292.50 $49Total$1,433,450Cost Weighting for Core Services (1.0 is Base Weighting)DescriptionDesign & Development Code Enforcement Central Service Total Homeshare STVR PermitHomeshare STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms$254$134$12$400Homeshare STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More$507$268$12$787Primary Residence Short‐Term Vacation Rental PermitPrimary Residence STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms$254$535$49$838Primary Residence STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More$507$803$49$1,360General Short‐Term Vacation Rental PermitGeneral STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms$254$803$49$1,106General STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More$507 $1,338$49$1,895154 City of La QuintaUser and Regulatory Fee StudyCalculation of Estimated Cost of Service: Short‐term Rental Permit FeeCost of Service and Cost RecoveryDescriptionCost of Service (Per Unit) Current Fee Current Cost Recovery Proposed Fee Proposed Cost Recovery Current Revenue Proposed Revenue Year‐to‐Year Change Over (Under) Recovery Homeshare STVR PermitHomeshare STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms$400$20050%$25063%$2,000 $2,500 $500 ($1,498)Homeshare STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More$787$20025%$50064%$0$0$0$0Primary Residence Short‐Term Vacation PermitPrimary Residence STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms$838$20024%$75089%$36,096 $135,360 $99,264 ($15,941)Primary Residence STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More$1,360 $20015%$1,25092%$2,304 $14,400 $12,096 ($1,262)General Short‐Term Vacation Rental PermitGeneral STVR Permit ‐ Less than 5 Bedrooms$1,106 $20018%$1,00090%$207,400 $1,037,000 $829,600 ($109,902)General STVR Permit ‐ 5 Bedrooms or More$1,895 $20011%$1,75092%$12,200 $106,750 $94,550 ($8,837)$260,000$1,296,010$1,036,010($137,440)Notes: ‐ Forecasted salary and benefit information based on FY 19/20 forecast expenditures. ‐ Labor allocation and time estimates provided based on anticipated program support ‐ Estimated STVR unit count received from City Finance staff, as of January 2021. Actual counts will change throughout the year ‐ Weighting factors intended to represent reasonable proportionality of effort required to serve various rental types155 156 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 15, 2020: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0006, AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 AMENDMENT NO. 2, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PROPOSING AN APPROXIMATE 125,000 SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER WITH DRIVE-THROUGHS AND A 63,000 SQUARE-FOOT SUPERMARKET WITH ASSOCIATED VEHICLE FUEL CENTER; CEQA: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 50 AND JEFFERSON STREET; PROJECT: PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2, “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Environmental Assessment 2017-0006. Adopt a resolution to approve Specific Plan 2017-0002, Amendment No. 2 of the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan (SP 1998-034), Tentative Parcel Map 2017- 0003 (TPM 37370), and Site Development Permit 2017-0009, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a Specific Plan Amendment (SPA), TPM, Site Development Permit (SDP), and Environmental Assessment (EA) to construct an approximate 125,000 sq. ft. shopping center consisting of commercial/office and retail buildings. Council considered this item during public hearings held in 2020. At the December 15 meeting, Council continued the public hearing until March 2, 2021 and asked that the Planning Commission (Commission) review the design of the corner area and provide a recommendation to Council. The Commission reviewed the corner design at their January 26 and February 17 meetings and recommended a revised design. FISCAL IMPACT If approved, once operational, the project would generate sales and property taxes. Estimated taxable sales range from $7-9 million per year for the Pavilions store, $5- 8 million per year in gas sales and approximately $16 million per year for retail and PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 157 restaurant sales for the remainder of the center. This volume of sales would produce $560,000-660,000 per year in new tax revenues for the City. Additionally, the estimated assessed value of the property is $28 million, yielding an estimated $12,000-17,000 per year in property taxes to the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS After review and consideration of the project and public testimony during four public hearings, the Commission recommended Council approval of this item on December 10, 2019. Council held public hearings on February 4, March 3, May 5, July 7, October 6, and December 15, 2020 (staff reports and related materials are hereby incorporated by this reference), reviewed the proposal, considered public testimony, and asked the applicant to further revise the design of the site. At the October hearing, the applicant presented exhibits with an enhanced plaza area and revised architecture of buildings at the corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 and requested a continuance to further refine the design. The corner buildings included slanted rooflines converging upward toward each other, extending to a height of 35 feet. This would have required a provision to be added to the SP to include an alternative development standard to the current image corridor height limit in the underlying zone. Per Section 9.90.040 of the Municipal Code, building height along image corridors is limited to 22 feet within 150 feet of the roadway. The Commission reviewed the proposal and did not recommend that this provision be incorporated into the SP, citing that the buildings with the slanted rooflines would be out of scale with the neighborhood and that the design would be counter to the desired iconic effect. The applicant presented the same corner building design to Council at their December 15 meeting. Council asked the applicant to revise the corner design, continued the public hearing to March 2, 2021 and asked that the Commission review the design of the corner area and provide a recommendation to Council before the March 2 meeting. The Commission reviewed the corner design at their January 26 and February 17 meetings where the applicant introduced a “date grove” concept for the site (Attachment 1). Buildings 5 and 6 have been oriented along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street and are rectangular shaped, designed with flat roofs with maximum building height of 21 ft., consistent with the image corridor requirement of 22 ft. Roof eaves extend out 20 feet from the two buildings which provide shaded patio seating or dining areas along the sides of the two buildings. A corner “date grove” plaza area includes gathering areas with center features and seating, surrounded by low circular walls. Date palm trees are oriented in uniform rows, like a date grove, augmented with palo verde trees and various low-level plantings. The Commission was pleased with the design. Overall, the new design at the corner helps to draw attention away from the power pole and direct your attention lower to the corner. The date grove of palm trees creates a shade canopy that helps filter 158 out the overhead pole and lines, in a “mini-park” setting. The Commission also had several suggestions for the applicant to improve the design including: •Operable glass doors for the tenant spaces for an enhanced outdoor experience. Applicant responded that this is contingent on the uses but that they are already including outdoor spaces and canopies extending out of the frontages for outdoor dining if these spaces become eating establishments. •Label the centerpieces and features in the date grove area to indicate fire features or fountains, etc. •Include more privacy in the date grove area with the retaining walls, but not with a hedge. •Provide more detail on vertical post-like features on the street side elevations of Buildings 5 and 6. Applicant stated that they can incorporate light features that can provide creative subdued lighting. The Commission also suggested that the date palm trees include up-lighting. •Provide more details on the brise soleil design features and asked if they will be carried through to the rest of the development. Applicant stated that they would take a “closer look” at that. •Increase the shade value in the interior plaza area, north and west of the buildings. Applicant stated that there will be physical shade structures as was previously shown to Council along with recessed building frontages with extended canopies for shaded outdoor seating. The Commission also suggested the applicant consider changing the type of palm tree within the interior plaza to a Washingtonia hybrid for greater shade canopy. The motion to recommend the revised design passed, 5 yay, 2 absent. A link to the meeting video is provided here. https://laquinta.12milesout.com/video/meeting/cbb7a2c7-0f40-4329-bdc9- fdfa0bd38c20 Because of the time constraints between the Commission meetings and the Council meeting, the applicant was unable to put together final drawings for each application. Staff included a condition of approval for the applicant to work with staff to finalize the drawings within 60 days of the approval date, if Council wishes to approve the project today. Specific Plan Amendment The Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project includes proposed deviations from the City’s Zoning standards and permitted uses (Attachment 2). Because the new design conforms to the height standards of the image corridor, there is no need to add a provision to deviate from that. Site Development Permit – Revised Site Plan The applicant has revised the site plan to incorporate the revised corner design and shows the shopping center with 13 buildings at 121,795 sq. ft. (Attachment 3). This results in 0.23 Floor Area Ratio (FAR), still below the allowed 0.30 FAR for the underlying Community Commercial (CC) zone. 159 Fuel Center Operations There are no new changes to the fuel center’s location and operations. The fuel center location is on the east side towards the middle of the site along Jefferson Street instead of along Avenue 50 and includes an 825 sq. ft. mini-mart (Attachment 2). Traffic/Circulation There are no new changes to the project vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The vehicular circulation includes access from four driveways, two along Jefferson Street and two along Avenue 50. Truck deliveries to Pavilion’s enter at the westernmost driveway on Avenue 50 and drive straight to the back of the building to the loading dock on the north side of the building, then exit at the northernmost driveway on Jefferson Street. Truck deliveries to the fuel station enter the site at the northernmost driveway on Jefferson Street and drive south to the fuel station, then exit the site at the southernmost driveway on Jefferson Street. Architecture The architectural style is proposed to be contemporary utilizing materials such as glass, wood, and various metals. Architectural detailing has been enhanced using building projections and varying rooflines. Buildings 5 and 6 have been revised to be rectangular in shape and maintain a maximum height of 21 ft. Rooflines are flat with parapets extending above to screen roof equipment (A/C units, vents etc.). The patio areas along the street side of the buildings are 20 ft wide and include wide overhangs to shade the patios. An additional shade element consisting of vertical brise soleil screen walls are incorporated at the edges of the overhangs. Elevations facing Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street include variations in color, articulated walls and incorporate the vertical brise soleil screen walls. Vertical post-like features are included in front of the buildings to give more architectural variety and can provide light features in them to create subdued ambient lighting. On the interior building side, building tenant spaces facing the plaza area are set back approximately 3-5 feet and also include awning canopies that project out 5-13 feet from the building face to allow for outdoor retail operations and activity and al fresco dining under shade. Unique shade features were added to the plaza to allow for gathering/seating spaces under shade. Landscaping and Lighting Landscaping at the corner area consists of date palms, fan palms and various low- level accent plants such as agave, desert spoon and barrel cactus. The seating area on the street side includes decomposed granite ground cover with date palms inside to create a date grove feel and will be enclosed with a low wall and include seating areas around fire pits. The updated site plan shows another gathering space in the interior plaza, defined with enhanced paving or decomposed granite ground cover and seating areas around fire pits and other features. Parking lot lighting for the project will consist of LED lighting, no taller than 20 feet, which complies with height limits of the CC District 160 Tentative Parcel Map The current parcel configuration consists of five parcels on the property. The TPM proposes to reconfigure the property into 13 parcels to accommodate 13 buildings. PUBLIC NOTICE The public hearing notice was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on June 26, 2020 and was sent to property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project site, in accordance with Section 9.200.100 of the Municipal Code. Because the project was continued to a date certain, March 02, 2021, public notice was not required; however, surrounding HOA representatives and interested parties were notified. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) be prepared for the project. Since the proposed project is essentially the same as the originally approved project in 1999 and amended in 2002, the MND reviewed the difference in the project between what was approved and what is currently proposed, (up to 25,340 sq. ft. increase) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 regarding subsequent environmental review. The MND included mitigation measures from previous environmental documents and proposed new mitigation measures where necessary. The MND was distributed to the City’s responsible agencies and interested members of the public. Thirteen comments were received during the 30-day comment period. Responses were sent to each commenting party. Comments and responses are included in the Final MND, which has been included in Exhibit A of the proposed Resolution. The MND has been revised, subsequent to circulation for public review, to be consistent with the findings of the updated traffic analysis, to consider site plan changes and to add suggested air quality mitigation measures from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. These revisions do not introduce any new significant impacts and do not trigger the need to recirculate the Draft MND for public review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. ALTERNATIVES 1.Council may elect not to adopt the MND and not to approve the SPA, TPM and SDP, which would leave SP 1998-034 Amendment No. 1 effective over the project site and a commercial shopping center project could be developed under that 2002 entitlement. 2.Council may continue the public hearing for all applications and have the applicant work with staff to finalize the drawings within 60 days for Council consideration. Prepared by: Cheri Flores, Planning Manager Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Revised Design Concept Drawings 2. Application Summary 3. Revised Site Plan 161 162 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0006 APPLICANT: LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on March 2, 2021, hold a continued Public Hearing to consider a request by Lundin Development Company for approval of the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center consisting of up to 125,800 sq. ft., generally located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 more particularly described as: APN 602-180-004 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on June 26, 2020 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a continued Public Hearing on December 15, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing to a date certain, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and did recommend that the Planning Commission review modified site design of the project, specifically at the corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California on January 26 and February 17, 2021, did review modified site design of the project, and did recommend Council approval of the modified site design; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a continued Public Hearing on October 6, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to a date certain, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package, and did refer a portion of the application back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation on adding a provision to the 163 Council Resolution 2021 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Page 2 of 5 Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did discuss on November 24, 2020 a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors and did not recommend the City Council add this provision; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold continued Public Hearings on May 5, and July 7, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearings to dates certain, at the applicant’s request to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold duly noticed Public Hearings on February 4 and March 3, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearings to dates certain, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a continued Public Hearing on December 10, 2019, and recommended Council approval of this project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a continued Public Hearing on October 8, 2019 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing to a date certain, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 26, 2018 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the traffic study and include an analysis of other intersections in the area; and WHEREAS, Environmental Assessment 1998-375 was adopted by the City Council on May 18, 1999 (City Council Resolution 1999-62) and analyzed the original project consisting of an approximate 110,000 sq. ft. shopping center, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 164 Council Resolution 2021 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Page 3 of 5 WHEREAS, an addendum to Environmental Assessment 1998-375 was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the CEQA and approved by the City Council on February 19, 2002 (City Council Resolution 2002-30), which analyzed an amendment to the project reducing the size of the shopping center to approximately 100,460 sq. ft.; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the CEQA, and determined that the project was substantially similar to the original project and amendment but that one or more conditions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 had been met requiring a subsequent analysis and determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) be prepared to analyze the difference in impacts from the originally adopted MND (Environmental Assessment 1998-375) and subsequent addendum to the currently proposed project. The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.250.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of Environmental Assessment 2017-0006: 1. As conditioned, proposed application will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2017-0006. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or 165 Council Resolution 2021 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Page 4 of 5 prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 3.There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources of the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4.The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable can be mitigated to be less than significant. 5.The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Impacts associated with noise and air quality can be mitigated to be less than significant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; SECTION 2. That the City Council does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the “Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 ‘Pavilion Palms’ Shopping Center La Quinta, CA”, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, enclosed as Exhibit A and incorporated herewith by this reference, for Environmental Assessment 2017-0006. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 2nd day of March, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: 166 Council Resolution 2021 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Page 5 of 5 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _________________________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________________ WILLIAM IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 167 168 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center La Quinta, CA EA2017-0006 Prepared for Lead Agency: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Prepared by: Jericho Systems, Inc. 47 N. First Street, 1st Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 307-5633 March 2018 RESOLUTION NO. 2021 - XXX EXHIBIT A ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 169 [this page left intentionally blank] 170 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 SECTION 2 – REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................... 2 SECTION 3 - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 3 SECTION 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM .................................................................... 8 I. AESTHETICS ..................................................................................................... 13 II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: ......................................... 16 III. AIR QUALITY .................................................................................................... 19 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................. 26 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: ............................................................................... 31 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS .................................................................................... 36 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: ................................................................... 40 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ............................................... 44 IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: ....................................................... 47 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING: .......................................................................... 51 XI. MINERAL RESOURCES: .................................................................................. 53 XII. NOISE: ................................................................................................................ 54 XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: ....................................................................... 62 XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES: .......................................................................................... 64 XV. RECREATION .................................................................................................... 66 XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: ....................................................................... 67 XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: ................................................................ 73 XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: ........................................................... 75 SECTION 5 - SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................... 80 SECTION 6 - REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 84 FIGURES Figure 1 Regional Overview ......................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2 Site Location ................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3 Site Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 7 171 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page ii TABLES Table 1 Proposed Site Plan ........................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2 Summer Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) ..................................................... 20 Table 3 Winter Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) ........................................................ 21 Table 4 Summer Operational Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) ....................................................... 22 Table 5 Winter Operational Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day)......................................................... 23 Table 6 Localized Significance Thresholds (Pounds per Day) ................................................................... 24 Table 7 Greenhouse Gas Construction Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) ................................................ 41 Table 8 Greenhouse Gas Operational Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) .................................................. 42 Table 9 Construction Equipment Noise Emission Levels ........................................................................... 55 Table 10 Vibration Source Levels for Typical Construction Equipment.................................................... 56 Table 11 Existing and Projected Future Operational Noise ........................................................................ 58 Table 12 Existing Conditions – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street .................................................................. 69 Table 13 Opening Day – With Project – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street ..................................................... 69 Table 14 Future Buildout (Year 2035) – With Project – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street ............................ 69 APPENDICES Appendix A Site Lighting Plan Appendix B Air Quality Model Results Appendix C Biological Resources Report Appendix D Cultural Resources Report Appendix E Noise Study Appendix F Traffic Studies Appendix G City of La Quinta Engineering Bulletin 06-13 172 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 1 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION Background La Quinta is a resort city in the Coachella Valley of Riverside County located between Indian Wells and Indio. As of the 2010 census, the population was approximately 37,000, up from the 2000 census, which recorded approximately 24,000. The city limits encompass approximately 37 miles and are generally bounded on the west by Washington Street and the Santa Rosa Mountains, on the north by lands south of Hovley Lane East, on the east by Jefferson Street and Monroe Street, and on the south by Avenue 62 and Avenue 64 (Figure 1). Topographically, the City is situated on a flat valley floor surrounded by low mountains, foothills and alluvial fans characteristic of the desert environment. The valley floor is the site of most of the City’s developed areas, while surrounding mountains and foothills have been designated and are retained as open space. The City has historically contained large areas of agriculture on the valley floor, but this has changed in recent years with increased urbanization. Development within the City limits is now primarily residential, commercial and resort oriented (Terra Nova, July 2012). Hwy 111, a major thoroughfare that provides access to most of the cities in the Coachella Valley, bisects the city’s northern portion. A majority of the major commercial and resort facilities are found along Hwy 111, with the remainder of the city designed for residential and light commercial/retail. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan of Land Use and associated parcel map to allow for the development of 100,460 square feet of a supermarket- anchored shopping center with adjacent retail pads on 12.5 acres at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue. The parcel is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The Specific Plan adoption included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. In 2002, an amendment to the Specific Plan was also adopted. To date, that project has not been constructed. On February 19. 2013, the City of La Quinta adopted the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its 2035 General Plan (SCH# 2010111094) which included the impacts of adding to commercial uses within the City, including the approved Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was also adopted for environmental impacts that could not be mitigated to a level below significance for: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic (Resolution 2013-009). Currently, the Lundin Development is requesting the City to authorize Amendment No. 2 to the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan to change the name of the approved Specific Plan to “Pavilion Palms” and construct a total of 125,800 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center and adjacent retail pads on the 12.5-acre site at the corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue, within the same area of the previously- approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, and its subsequent amendment. Amendment No. 2 would add 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses. Proposed uses within the commercial center development are similar to the previously approved plan, and include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 3). 173 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 2 SECTION 2 – REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The City of La Quinta has identified that the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Project meets the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 definition of a Project. CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 defines a Project as the following: (a) "Project" means the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. This document is an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including all criteria, standards, and procedures of CEQA (California Public Resource Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq.). This IS/MND is an informational document intended for use by the City of La Quinta, City Council and Responsible agencies, and members of the general public in evaluating the physical environmental effects of the proposed Project. It was compiled by the City of La Quinta with the assistance of Jericho Systems Inc. (Jericho). The City of La Quinta is serving as the Lead Agency for the proposed Project pursuant to CEQA §21067 and CEQA Guidelines Article 4 and §15367. “Lead Agency” refers to the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a Project. Organization of the Initial Study The Initial Study is organized as follows: Introduction: Provides the regulatory context for the review along a brief summary of the CEQA process. Project Information: Provides fundamental Project information, such as the Project description, Project location and figures. Lead Agency Determination: Identifies environmental factors potentially affected by the Project and identifies the Lead Agency's determination based on the initial evaluation. Mitigated Negative Declaration: Prepared when a determination can be made that no significant environmental effects will occur because revisions to the Project have been made or mitigation measures will be implemented which will reduce all potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Monitoring Program Table: Identifies objectives, criteria, and specific procedures to administer the SBVWCD’s responsibilities under CEQA. Evaluating Environmental Impacts: Provides the parameters the SBVWCD uses when determining level of impact. CEQA Checklist: Provides an environmental checklist and accompanying analysis for responding to checklist questions. References: Includes a list of references and various resources utilized in preparing the analysis. 174 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 3 SECTION 3 - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Introduction Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to amend the previously approved Fairway Specific Plan by changing the name to “Pavilion Palms,” and constructing a total of 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 would add 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses to the 100,460 square feet previously approved. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include the same uses as previously approved, including banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 3). The site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The amended Project, with the 125,800 square feet represents approximately 0.22 FAR, below the maximum allowed under the City’s General Plan. The Assessor Parcel Numbers for this Project are: APNs: 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602- 180-013, and 602-180-014. Per the City of La Quinta General Plan, the Project site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) for commercial use. The site is bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by residential development that fronts Jess Anne Drive, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. Detailed Project Description Site Plan The Project site consists of five parcels that total approximately 12 acres. The proposed Project will be anchored by Pavilions grocery store and includes restaurants, banks, and retail units, as well as a fuel center/convenience market. In total, the proposed development would provide approximately 125,800 square feet (sf) of gross floor area, which is detailed by building and proposed use in Table 1. Construction Scenario The site is currently vacant, so no demolition of existing structures are necessary. The project is anticipated to be constructed and opened to the public in approximately two years. For this analysis, the project opening day is assumed to be in the year 2020. Grading The site is relatively flat and contains sparse desert scrub. Soil balancing will be used during grading so that there will be no soil import or export. The desert scrub brush on site will be removed or buried depending on size and type. 175 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 4 Site Utilities All utilities are available for connection from the main lines located within the paved rights of way along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. Site Ingress/Egress Development Access to the Project is proposed via five driveways (labeled A-E in Figure 3): two to the south on Avenue 50, two to the east on Jefferson Street, and one to the north on Derek Alan Drive. Table 1 Proposed Site Plan 176 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 5 Figure 1 Regional Overview 177 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 6 Figure 2 Site Location 178 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 7 Figure 3 Site Plan 179 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 8 Section 4 - Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center 2. Lead Agency Name: City of La Quinta Address: 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person: Cheri Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 8-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone Number: (760) 777-7000 4. Project Location: Assessor Parcel Numbers 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602-180-013, and 602-180-014 0660-081-30 Intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 5. Project Sponsor’s Lundin Development Name and Address: 16400 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 207 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) 7. Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) 8. Project Description Summary: Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to amend the previously approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan by changing the name to “Pavilion Palms,” and constructing a total of 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12- acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 would add 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses to the 100,460 square feet previously approved. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include the same uses as previously approved, including banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 3). The site is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The proposed Project will be anchored by Pavilions grocery store and includes restaurants, banks, and retail units, as well as a fuel center/convenience market. The project is anticipated to be constructed and opened to the public in approximately two years. For this analysis, the project opening day is assumed to be in the year 2020. Prior approvals for this site include the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan and associated Amendment No. 1, which was approved by the City of La Quinta in 1999 and 2002, respectively. That plan identified the development of 100,460 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center with adjacent retail pads on 12.5 acres at the corner of Jefferson Street 50th Avenue. The 1998 and 2002 180 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 9 Specific Plan adoption included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. That project was not constructed. On February 19. 2013, the City of La Quinta adopted the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its 2035 General Plan (SCH# 2010111094) which included the impacts of adding to commercial uses within the City, including the approved Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was also adopted for environmental impacts that could not be mitigated to a level below significance for: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic (Resolution 2013-009). The Proposed Project represents Amendment No. 2 to the existing, approved Specific Plan. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The site is located on a vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 2). The site is bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by a large retention basin with residential development west of the retention basin, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development within the City of Indio, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. 10. Lead Agency Discretionary Actions: Discretionary actions that may be taken by the Lead Agency include, but are not limited to, the following: Grading Plan approval Approval of an Amendment to SP98-034 Fairway Plaza Specific Plan (SP2017-0002) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 (TPM2017-0003) Approval of Site Development Permit (SDP2017-0009) 11. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.): Construction Compliance – Stormwater Discharge. Construction projects that disturb 1 acre of land or more are required to obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities (General Construction Permit), which requires the applicant to file a notice of intent (NOI) to discharge stormwater and to prepare and implement a SWPPP. The SWPPP includes an overview of the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be implemented to prevent soil erosion and discharge of other construction-related pollutants that could contaminate nearby water resources. Federal, State and Local permits for the fuel station, as required. 12. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun? Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083.3.2.) 181 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 10 Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality. The City of La Quinta initiated AB52 process began October 3, 2017. Letters were sent to tribes on the list received from the Native American Heritage Commission. Responses were received from Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (Cabazon), Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) and Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians (Twenty-Nine Palms). The Cultural Study from CRM Tech was sent to ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms as requested. Both ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms asked for approved Native American Monitors from the ACBCI and Twenty-Nine Palms to be present during ground disturbing activities of the project construction. 182 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 11 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ̀ Aesthetics . Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology & Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation / Traffic Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation, the following finding is made: The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature (prepared by Jericho Systems, Inc.) Date Signature (Lead Agency, City of La Quinta) Date 3/22/2018 3/22/2018 183 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 12 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. d) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 184 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 13 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply I. Aesthetics Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Environmental Setting La Quinta includes a mixture of building types built over various time periods, and with a variety of architectural styles. Development includes structures built in the early twentieth century, and new master- planned communities built within the last decade. Architectural styles include those typical of Spanish Colonial, Mediterranean, Contemporary, Tuscan, and Modern styles. Spanish Colonial architecture is the most prevalent style used in La Quinta, and examples include the La Quinta Resort & Spa and Old Towne in the Village (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). The Project site is currently vacant. The surrounding land use designations consist primarily of residential and commercial. The site is bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by a retention basin with residential development west of the retention basin, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store. Consistent with the approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, the Project, as revised, will still contain design elements consistent with the City’s design standards, including Contemporary architectural style using arched colonnades with tile roofs. Additional architectural elements such as textured finishes, roundels, accent tile and raised trellises will be used to provide further details and interest, thus further enhancing the individual buildings and the quality appearance of the shopping center in general. The landscaped setbacks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street will incorporate sidewalks with a variety of trees, shrubs and flowers, which accompanied by the parking lot landscaping, are designed to provide an inviting atmosphere to draw shoppers to the center. Impact Analysis a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 185 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 14 Less Than Significant Impact. The CEQA Guidelines do not provide a definition of what constitutes a “scenic vista” or “scenic resource” or a reference as to from what vantage point(s) the scenic vista and/or resource, if any, should be observed. However, a scenic vista can generally be defined as a viewpoint from a public vantage that provides expansive views of a highly-valued landscape for the benefit of the general public. Common examples include undeveloped hillsides, ridgelines, and open space areas that provide a unifying visual backdrop to a developed area. Scenic resources can generally be defined as those landscape patterns and features that are visually or aesthetically pleasing and that contribute affirmatively to the definition of a distinct community or region such as trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings. The Project site currently consists of vacant, disturbed land. The Project site is not considered to be a scenic vista. As previously discussed, the surrounding land uses include residential and commercial use. The heights of the proposed buildings are consistent with the municipal code and other commercial areas in the vicinity, and are not considered to be obtrusive when compared to the surrounding area. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The Project is not located within a state scenic highway, and therefore, no impact to trees or rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within a state scenic highway would occur. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site currently consists of vacant, disturbed land. As previously discussed, the surrounding land uses include residential and commercial uses. The height and scale of the proposed buildings are consistent with other commercial areas in the vicinity, and is not considered to be obtrusive when compared to the surrounding area. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of La Quinta does not permit construction activities outside of daylight hours, so the construction associated with the proposed Project would not cause the emission of light beyond existing circumstances in that area. Within the City limits, the majority of lands are developed, and daytime and nighttime skies are already impacted to a limited extent by light and glare. The site lighting includes 14 poles for the entire 540,989 square foot lot. The lighting plan identifies the use of LED lighting placed in a manner where the light will spread out uniformly across the lot while maintaining a lower power density. Based on the photometric plans, there is almost no leakage onto off site areas. The light intensity begins to fade long before reaching anywhere outside the lot. A lighting plan and study was completed on August 21, 2017 by Innovative Design Engineers (Appendix A). The dual head pole in the southwest corner will need to be shielded to prevent spillage into the residential area. 186 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 15 Additionally, California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 (Building Energy Efficiency Standards), establishes requirements for outdoor lighting for residential and nonresidential development. The standards regulate lighting characteristics such as maximum power and brightness, shielding, and sensor controls to turn lighting on and off. The City requires that commercial structures comply with Title 24. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006 No mitigation measures were identified to be associated with the previously-approved project. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): AES-1 Provide shielding for the dual head pole in the southwest corner as per the lighting design engineering recommendations. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 187 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 16 II.Agriculture and Forestry Resources:Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Environmental Setting Agriculture has historically been a major economic sector in the eastern portion of the Coachella Valley, including La Quinta. Although most of the farms have within the incorporated regions of La Quinta no longer exist, agriculture is still an economic factor east of the incorporated boundary, within the proposed Sphere of Influence and beyond. (Terra Nova, July 2012). The Riverside County Important Farmland 2016 Map, developed by the California Department of Conservation, highlights areas within the Coachella Valley that are important agricultural producing lands. Prime Farmland includes areas with both good physical and chemical attributes able to sustain 188 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 17 long-term agriculture production. Unique Farmland areas produce crops of statewide importance; however contain lower quality soils than those within Prime Farmland. The site was formerly utilized for citrus grove farming, but the groves were removed in the early 1990s. The site is identified by the State of California Department of Conservation as Farmlands of Local Importance. Farmland of Local Importance are lands generally without irrigation, and which produce dry crops that may be important locally, but are not important for statewide agriculture production. The Project site is currently vacant land that is zoned for commercial uses. Impact Analysis a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Less Than Significant. The site was formerly utilized for citrus grove farming, but the groves were removed in the early 1990s. The site is identified by the State of California Department of Conservation as Farmlands of Local Importance. Farmland of Local Importance are lands generally without irrigation, and which produce dry crops that may be important locally, but are not important for statewide agriculture production. The Project site is only approximately 12 acres which is not suitable for sustainable commercial crops. The City of La Quinta has designated the Site as Community Commercial for development of commercial use. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to this criterion because while the site is designated for local importance, it is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. There are no agricultural or Williamson Act contract lands within the Project site. Therefore, no impact would occur. c)Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project site currently consists of vacant land, and is zoned Community Commercial (CC). The Project site does not contain forest land. Therefore, no impact would occur. d)Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. There is no forest land in the Project area. Therefore, no impact would occur in this regard. e)Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non- forest use? 189 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 18 No Impact. The Project Area consists of vacant, disturbed land and is zoned Community Commercial (CC). Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 190 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 19 III.Air Quality Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Environmental Setting Lundin Development is proposing a 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center project on approximately 12 acres. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved a 100,460 square-foot mixed-use commercial center Specific Plan for the 12-acre Project Site. The approval of the Specific Plan included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The City also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR on February 19, 2013. Therefore, the analysis herein is based on the net increase of approximately 25,340 square-feet of new uses not previously reviewed or approved in the 1999 Specific Plan and subsequent 2012 Updated General Plan. Impact Analysis – Air Quality a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant. The Project Site is located in the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has jurisdiction over air quality issues and regulations within the SSAB. The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin establishes a program of rules and regulations administered by SCAQMD to obtain attainment of the state and federal air quality standards. The most recent AQMP (AQMP 2016) was adopted by the SCAQMD on March 3, 2017. The 2016 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories. The 2016 AQMP was adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Council on April 7, 2016. 191 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 20 The Proposed Project is located within the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation of the Specific Plan/General Plan. The proposed mixed-use commercial uses are allowed within the CC land use area which have been reviewed and approved within the 2012 General Plan update. Approval of the proposed revision would not require a zone change nor a General Plan Amendment. Therefore, approval of the Proposed Project would not conflict with the AQMP. Less than significant impact is anticipated. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions (based on net the increase of approximately 25,340 square-feet of new uses) were screened using California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.1 prepared by the SCAQMD (Appendix B). CalEEMod was used to estimate the on-site and off-site construction emissions. The emissions incorporate Rule 402 and 403 by default as required during construction. The criteria pollutants screened for include: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulates (PM10 and PM2.5). In addition, reactive organic gas (ROG) emissions are analyzed. Two of the analyzed pollutants, ROG and NOX, are ozone precursors. Both summer and winter season emission levels were estimated. Construction Emissions Construction emissions are considered short-term, temporary emissions and were modeled with the following construction parameters: site grading (mass and fine grading), building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The resulting emissions generated by construction of the Proposed Project are shown in Table 2 and Table 3, summer and winter construction emissions, respectively. As shown in Table 2 and Table 3, construction emissions would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds with the implementation of a 10-day painting schedule. Therefore, Mitigation Measure AIR-1 is recommended during the construction Phase: Table 2 Summer Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source/Phase ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 0.9 10.5 4.5 0.0 0.7 0.5 Grading 1.3 10.5 8.3 0.0 1.1 1.0 Building Construction 1.3 13.2 8.5 0.0 0.9 0.8 Paving 1.0 8.8 7.9 0.0 0.7 0.5 Architectural Coating 59.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 0.2 0.2 Highest Value (lbs/day) 59.0 13.2 8.5 0.0 1.1 1.0 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Summer Emissions. Phases do not overlap and represent the highest concentration. 192 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 21 Table 3 Winter Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source/Phase ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 0.9 10.5 4.5 0.0 0.7 0.5 Grading 1.3 10.5 8.3 0.0 1.1 1.0 Building Construction 1.3 13.2 8.5 0.0 0.9 0.8 Paving 1.0 8.8 7.9 0.0 0.7 0.5 Architectural Coating 59.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 0.2 0.2 Highest Value (lbs/day) 59.0 13.2 8.5 0.0 1.1 1.0 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Winter Emissions. Phases do not overlap and represent the highest concentration. Compliance with SCAQMD Rules 402, and 403 Although the Proposed Project does not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction emissions, the Applicant would be required to comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations as the SSAB is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM10). Compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402, and 403 The Project Applicant would be required to comply with Rules 402 nuisance, and 403 fugitive dust, which require the implementation of Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) for each fugitive dust source, and the AQMP, which identifies Best Available Control Technologies (BACTs) for area sources and point sources. The BACMs and BACTs would include, but not be limited to the following: 1.The Project Proponent shall ensure that any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre-watered prior to the onset of grading activities. a.The Project Proponent shall ensure that watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on-going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly (2 times daily) to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface and shall be watered at the end of each workday. b.The Project Proponent shall ensure that all disturbed areas are treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. c.The Project Proponent shall ensure that landscaped areas are installed as soon as o reduce the potential for wind erosion. d.The Project Proponent shall ensure that all grading activities are suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, would increase NOX and PM10 levels in the area. Although the Proposed Project does not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during construction, the Applicant/Contractor would be required to implement the following conditions as required by SCAQMD: 193 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 22 1. To reduce emissions, all equipment used in grading and construction must be tuned and maintained to the manufacturer’s specification to maximize efficient burning of vehicle fuel. 2. The Project Proponent shall ensure that existing power sources are utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on-site power generation during construction. 3. The Project Proponent shall ensure that construction personnel are informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. All buildings on the Project Site shall conform to energy use guidelines in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. 5. The operator shall maintain and effectively utilize and schedule on-site equipment in order to minimize exhaust emissions from truck idling. 6. The operator shall comply with all existing and future California Air Resources Board (CARB) and SCAQMD regulations related to diesel-fueled trucks, which may include among others: (1) meeting more stringent emission standards; (2) retrofitting existing engines with particulate traps; (3) use of low sulfur fuel; and (4) use of alternative fuels or equipment. Operational Emissions The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Albert Grover & Associates on July 27, 2017. The TIA determined that the shopping center would generate approximately 13,328 daily trips (See Table 4 of Appendix F). Trips were broken down by land use and land use size. The TIA also included a 20-percent reduction in traffic to account for pass- by-credit. As the Proposed Project is evaluated as the Specific Plan delta of 25,340 square-feet of new uses (approximately 20 percent greater than was approved in the Specific Plan), 4,513 daily trips (approximately 34 percent of the development based on more intense uses) were modeled to represent a worst-case scenario. Emissions associated with the Proposed Project’s estimated vehicle trips were modeled and are listed in Table 3 and Table 4, summer and winter operational emissions, respectively. As shown, both summer and winter season operational emissions are below SCAQMD thresholds. Impacts are anticipated to be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. Table 4 Summer Operational Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Energy 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mobile 8.2 45.8 41.7 0.1 5.5 1.6 Totals (lbs/day) 8.9 46.5 42.2 0.1 5.5 1.6 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significance No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Summer Emissions. 194 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 23 Table 5 Winter Operational Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Energy 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mobile 6.7 44.7 42.2 0.0 5.5 1.6 Totals (lbs/day) 7.4 45.4 42.2 0.0 5.5 1.6 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significance No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Winter Emissions. The Proposed Project does not exceed applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds during the short-term construction phase with the implementation of at a minimum 10-day painting schedule or operational activities and the associated impacts are considered to be less than significant with the mitigation measure incorporated. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant. The project was previously reviewed and approved as the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center, Project 2002-06, designed to provide approximately 100,460 square feet of retail space with accommodating parking and landscaping areas The Proposed Project, revised as the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center, includes the original 100,460 square feet of retail space with accommodating parking and landscape area plus an additional 25,340 square-feet of complementary uses. The additional uses would not cumulatively generate a considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant nor violate any air quality standard during construction and operation of the Proposed Project (refer to Table 2 through Error! Reference source not found.). The site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The proposed Project represents approximately 0.22 FAR. Therefore, because the Project proposes to use less than the maximum allowed under the zoning, a less than significant impact is anticipated. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant. SCAQMD has developed a methodology to assess the localized impacts of emissions from a Proposed Project as outlined within the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology report; completed in June 2003 and revised in July 2008. The use of Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) is voluntary, to be implemented at the discretion of local public agencies acting as a lead agency pursuant to CEQA. Although the proposed use would not exceed SCAQMD Thresholds (Table 2 through Table 4) LSTs, including the restaurant drive-through facilities, were evaluated to further demonstrate at a local level that impacts would be less than significant. LSTs would typically only apply to projects that must undergo CEQA or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and are five acres or less. Although the Proposed Project calls for 5.78 acres of net development, LST methodology will be incorporated to represent worst-case scenario emissions thresholds. CalEEMod version 2016.3.1 was used to estimate the on-site and off-site construction emissions. The LSTs were developed to analyze the significance of potential air quality impacts of proposed projects to sensitive receptors (i.e. schools, single family residences, etc.) and provides screening tables for small projects (one, two, or five acres). Projects are evaluated based on geographic location and distance from the sensitive receptor (25, 50, 100, 200, or 500 meters form the site). 195 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 24 For the purposes of a CEQA analysis, the SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a receptor such as residence, hospital, convalescent facility or anywhere that it is possible for an individual to remain for 24 hours. Additionally, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities can also be considered as sensitive receptors. Commercial and industrial facilities are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because employees do not typically remain on-site for a full 24 hours, but are usually present for shorter periods of time, such as eight hours. The Proposed Project includes approximately 12 acres of development. The “5 acres scenario” was used to represent a worst-case scenario as the larger the site the greater the emission allowance. The Project Site is located at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 and is bordered to the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development, to the west by Jess Anne Drive and residential development, to the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and to the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. The nearest sensitive receptor land uses are the residential developments located adjacent to the north, west, and south boundary of the Project Site and therefore LSTs are based on a 25-meter distance. A comparison of the construction and operational emissions with the appropriate LST, per distance from the Project Site boundary (geographical area of Source Receptor Area (SRA) No. 30 – Coachella Valley; 5-acre site) according to the SCAQMD Mass Rate Look-up Tables, are listed in Table 6. Table 6 Localized Significance Thresholds (Pounds per Day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Construction Emissions (Max. from Table 2 and/or Table 3) 13.2 8.5 1.1 1.0 Operational Emissions (Max. Total from Table 4 and/or Table 5)1 4.6 4.2 0.6 0.6 Highest Value (lbs/day) 13.2 8.5 1.1 0.6 1.0 0.6 LST Thresholds 132 2,292 14* 4† 8* 2† Greater Than Threshold No No No No No No Note: PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are separated into construction and operational thresholds in accordance with the SCAQMD Mass Rate LST Look-up Tables. * Construction emissions LST threshold † Operational emissions LST threshold 1 Per LST Methodology, mobile source emissions do not need to be included except for land use emissions and on-site vehicle emissions. It is estimated that approximately 10% of mobile emissions will occur on the Project Site. Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Summer & Winter Emissions; SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology; SCAQMD Mass Rate Look-up Tables for 5-acre site in SRA No. 30, distance of 25 meters. As shown in Table 6, the Proposed Project’s emissions are not anticipated to exceed the LSTs. Therefore, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Less than significant impact is anticipated and no mitigation measures are required. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant. The Proposed Project does not contain land uses typically associated with the emission of objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the Proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities; and the temporary storage of domestic solid waste (refuse) associated with the Projects’ long- term operational uses. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts resulting from construction activity. Any construction odor emissions generated would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of 196 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 25 construction activity. It is expected that Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City of La Quinta’s solid waste regulations. The Project would be also required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the Proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition, and shall be properly serviced and repaired as needed. ꞏ Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the project proponent shall demonstrate, or cause to be demonstrated to the Community Development Department that all construction equipment to be utilized shall be low emission, or how the use of low emission construction equipment is infeasible. Low VOC paints, primers and coatings shall be required for all buildings on the project site. All paints shall be applied using either a high volume/low pressure spray or by hand. The proposed project shall provide a bus turnout, shelter and associated improvements on Jefferson Street and on Avenue 50, unless Sunline Transit provides written confirmation-that no such turnout(s) or shelters are needed. As required by the Municipal Code, the businesses operating within the proposed project shall conform to the Transportation Demand Management requirements in place at the time they begin operation. Deliveries to the project site shall occur during off-peak periods. Mitigation Measures: AIR-1: Contractor is to implement at a minimum a 10-day painting schedule. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 197 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 26 IV. Biological Resources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Environmental Setting The subject parcel is mapped on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) – La Quinta, 7.5-Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle Map near the southern boundary of Section 32, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. The elevation of the center of the project site is 34 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The existing topography of this site is relatively flat. The soils within the subject parcel consist of Myoma fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes and Myoma fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopes. This soil type consists of wind-blown sandy alluvium and is somewhat excessively drained. The local climatic conditions in the project area are characterized by hot summers, mild winters, infrequent rainfall, and low humidity. The average annual temperature ranges from an average low of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (° F) in December to an average high of 107° F in July-August. The rainy season begins in November and continues through March, with the quantity and frequency of rain varying from year to year. The average annual rainfall is approximately 3.15 inches. 198 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 27 Biological Surveys Jericho Systems, Inc. (Jericho) prepared a General Biological Resources Assessment and Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Review in May 2017 (Jericho, May 23, 2017). The City of La Quinta falls entirely within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) area. The subject parcel is not located within or adjacent a Conservation Area. The CVMSHCP requires a habitat assessment for the burrowing owl (BUOW). If habitat for the BUOW is present, a focused survey is required. Several sensitive species have been documented within the vicinity of the subject parcel, including the State- and/or federally-listed as threatened or endangered flat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii), Coachella Valley milk-vetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae) and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata), as well as burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), which is considered a Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). On May 7, 2017, Jericho Biologist Eugene Jennings conducted a systematic and comprehensive pedestrian survey on site to assess the habitat suitability for burrowing owl to satisfy the requirements set forth in the CVMSHCP and to determine if focused presence/absence surveys for any of the species would be required. The habitat assessment included a 100 percent coverage pedestrian field survey, and adherence to the MSHCP Burrowing Owl California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) survey protocols. Surveys were conducted during optimal burrowing owl activity times, consistent with conservation ethics, systematic and covered all habitat types on the site, and during a good rainfall year. Survey Results The biological survey report (Jericho, May 23, 2017) indicated that the entire subject parcel is within an urban developed area and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land that has previously been rough graded. The project site is completely disturbed, consisting entirely of previously graded soils with sparse weedy vegetation and re-sprouted creosote bush scrub (Larrea tridentata Shrubland Alliance) associated species. Plant species observed on site include creosote, as well as ruderal and non-native species including, Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) and saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima). No suitable BUOW habitat was identified on site during the burrowing owl habitat assessment survey. Therefore, no additional protocol-level focused surveys will be required. No other listed or sensitive species or sensitive habitat were observed on the site. The subject parcel does not contain suitable habitat for any of the sensitive species that have been documented in the project vicinity. There were no stream channels, washes, or swales as defined by Section 1600 of the State of California Fish and Game Code (FGC) under jurisdiction of the CDFW, or “Waters of the United States” (WoUS) as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) within the subject parcel. 199 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 28 Impact Analysis a)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant. Several sensitive species have been documented within the vicinity of the subject parcel, including the State- and/or federally-listed as threatened or endangered flat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii), Coachella Valley milk-vetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae) and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata), as well as burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), which is considered a Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The biological survey results identified that the entire subject parcel is within an urban developed area and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land that has previously been rough graded. No suitable BUOW habitat was identified on site during the burrowing owl habitat assessment survey; therefore, no additional protocol-level focused surveys are required. No other listed or sensitive species or sensitive habitat were observed on the site. The subject parcel does not contain suitable habitat for any of the sensitive species that have been documented in the project vicinity. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. Riparian communities occur along stream courses and drainages, and are floristically and structurally distinct from the adjacent upland communities. The biological survey results identified that the entire subject parcel is within an urban developed area and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land that has previously been rough graded. There were no stream channels, washes, or swales as defined by Section 1600 of the FGC under jurisdiction of the CDFW, or WoUS as defined by Section 404 of the CWA under the jurisdiction of the Corps within the subject parcel. The Project site is completely disturbed and barren with no hydrological process on site. There are no natural streams or drainages that traverse the Project site. The lack of hydrology on site makes it non-suitable for riparian habitat. No adverse impacts to riparian or sensitive natural habitat would occur. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. The biological survey results identified that the entire subject parcel is within an urban developed area and consists of disturbed, undeveloped land that has previously been rough graded. There were no stream channels, washes, or swales as defined by Section 1600 of the FGC under jurisdiction of the CDFW, or WoUS as defined by Section 404 of the CWA under the jurisdiction of the Corps within the subject parcel. The Project site is completely disturbed and barren with no hydrological process on site. There are no natural streams or drainages that traverse the Project site. The lack of hydrology on site makes it non-suitable for riparian habitat. Therefore, there is no impacts because no wetlands occur on site, nor are there fluvial processes where wetlands would be present. 200 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 29 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is surrounded by urban development. Additionally, the Project site itself is fully disturbed with no ability to provide movement of fish or wildlife species. Additionally, no known wildlife corridors are identified within the Project site or the immediate vicinity. No adverse impacts to wildlife movement would occur. However, the project site contains sparse weedy vegetation and re-sprouted creosote bush scrub (Larrea tridentata Shrubland Alliance) associated species, as well as ruderal and non-native species including, Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) and saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima), which represents potential foraging and nesting habitat for migratory bird species. The impacts for these bird species however, are not considered regionally or locally significant but the State of California prohibits the “take” of active bird nests. To avoid an illegal take of active bird nests, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is required to reduce impacts to less than significant. Mitigation measure BIO-1 is located at the end of this section. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. As biological resources, including threatened resources and habitat that could support such species, are not present on or near the Project site, no policies or ordinances protecting such resources would apply. This includes tree preservation policies. Therefore, there are no conflicts with local policies or ordinances. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Less Than Significant. The City of La Quinta falls entirely within the CVMSHCP area. The subject parcel is not located within or adjacent to a Conservation Area. The CVMSHCP requires a habitat assessment for the BUOW which requires focused surveys if present. Several sensitive species have been documented within the vicinity of the subject parcel, including the State- and/or federally-listed as threatened or endangered flat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii), Coachella Valley milk-vetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae) and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata), as well as burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), which is considered a Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). However, site surveys for the BUOW indicated that there is no suitable habitat for the BUOW or any sensitive species documented within the vicinity. Therefore, there are no conflicts with any adopted conservation plan. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. 201 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 30 Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): BIO – 1: Any grubbing, brushing or tree removal should be conducted outside of the State identified nesting season for migratory birds, which is typically March 15 through September 1. If work cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a migratory nesting bird survey within and adjacent to the project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three (3) days prior to initiating the construction activities. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) will be prepared and implemented. At a minimum, the NBP will include guidelines for addressing active nests, establishing buffers, monitoring, and reporting. The NBP will include a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and an appropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from direct and indirect impact. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be determined by the biologist, and shall be based on the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, and expected types of disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing, within which no vegetation clearing or ground disturbance shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and a monitoring report has been submitted, reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 202 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 31 V. Cultural Resources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleon- tological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X e) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code 21074? X Environmental Setting The Coachella Valley is a historical center of Native American settlement where a large number of Indian villages and rancherias were observed in the mid-nineteenth century. The Cahuilla people are generally divided, by anthropologists, into three groups, according to their geographic setting: the Pass Cahuilla in the Banning-Beaumont area, the Mountain Cahuilla in the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains and the Cahuilla Valley, and the Desert Cahuilla in the Coachella Valley. The Cahuilla did not have a single name that referred to an all-inclusive tribal affiliation. Membership was in terms of lineages or clans. Individual clans had villages, or central places, and territories they called their own. These were lands they considered theirs for purposes of hunting game, gathering food, or utilizing other necessary resources in the forms of trade, intermarriage, and ceremonies. Cultural Surveys CRM Tech prepared two studies for the Project site. The first consisted of Phase I and Phase II cultural assessments conducted in 1998 and 1995 for approximate 50 acres of undeveloped land as part of Tentative Parcel Map No. 29052 and Tentative Tract Map No. 29053, which included a residential development and the current commercial Project site. The study was part of the environmental impact review process for the proposed subdivision and development of the property, as required by the City of La Quinta, Lead Agency for the project, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC §21000, et seq.). The second study was conducted in June 2017 and consisted of a historical/archaeological resources records search, historical background review, and an archaeological field inspection of the approximately 12-acre Project site (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). The Phase I survey in 1998 identified and recorded a total of seven prehistoric - i.e., Native American - archaeological sites, three of which were located within or partially within the current project area (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). All three of these sites represented prehistoric habitation remains featuring surface 203 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 32 scatters of lithic and ceramic artifacts. The presence of these sites, along with the previous discovery of a dense cluster of similar sites in the surrounding area, which lies on the former shoreline of Holocene Lake Cahuilla, prompted the subsequent Phase II archaeological testing and evaluation program. The Phase II study entailed surface collection of all artifacts and excavation of 13 standard hand-dug, one-square-meter archaeological testing units to the depth of one meter at the three sites and within a modified mesquite sand dune near one of the sites. In addition to CRM TECH staff archaeologists, the field crew included three Native Americans affiliated with the nearby Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. A total of 106 artifacts were recovered through surface collection, but the test units indicated “an almost complete absence” of subsurface cultural material. Only three pottery sherds and two flakes of chipped quartz were produced from the 13 excavated units. In light of these findings, none of the three sites was found to meet CEQA criteria for significance (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). The Phase II study concluded that the proposed development of the subject property would not cause a substantial adverse change to any historical resources or important archaeological resources, but recommended archaeological monitoring of earth-moving activities in the area of the modified dune. The artifact collection and catalogue have since been curated at the La Quinta Historical Society. Records Search A standard one-mile-radius records search was conducted on May 17, 2017, by CRM TECH. The records indicated that no further archaeological studies have occurred in the project area since 1998, and no additional sites have been identified on the property. In 2006, the project area was included in a citywide survey focusing on built-environment resources of historical origin, but none was found in or near the project area. Outside the project area but within the one-mile scope, historical records identified that more than 70 previous cultural resources studies have been completed on various tracts of land and linear features, 49 of them since 1998. Collectively, these studies covered roughly 85 percent of the land within the scope of the records, and resulted in the identification of 93 historical/archaeological sites and 21 isolates - i.e., localities with fewer than three artifacts - within the one-mile radius. Nearly all of these sites and isolates were of prehistoric origin, and most were found along or near the ancient shoreline of Lake Cahuilla. None of these sites or isolates was found in the immediate vicinity of the Project area, but their presence certainly supports the high archaeological sensitivity assessment for the project vicinity. Field Inspection On May 15, 2017, CRM TECH archeologist Daniel Ballester, M.S., carried out the field inspection by walking a series of parallel north-south transects spaced 30 meters (approximately 100 feet) apart. Survey Results In 1998, the project area was noted as former agricultural land that had been cleared of its groves, with a rectangular-shaped mound, representing the modified dune, near Avenue 50. The 2017 report noted that the since the 1998 report, the project area has undergone additional disturbance from the installation of underground sewage pipes, as evidenced by several man holes across the property. The mound has been removed, and a 110 foot x 110 foot earthen pad has been created near the center of the property since July 2016 (Google Earth 2016). Furthermore, the ground surface bears evidence of recent mechanical clearing. 204 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 33 No archaeological features or artifacts, either prehistoric or historical, were encountered during the field inspection. The 2017 survey concluded that the original conclusion of the 1998 Phase II study - that the proposed development would have No Impact on any known “historical resources,” as defined by CEQA - remains valid and appropriate for the current Project. Nevertheless, in light of past discoveries in the vicinity, the overall archaeological sensitivity of the project location remains high, and the potential of encountering subsurface prehistoric cultural remains within the project boundaries cannot be overlooked (CRM Tech, June 5, 2017). Paleontological Resources The San Bernardino County Museum performed a Paleontology Literature/Records Review on May 2, 2017 for the subject parcel (Appendix D). The report identified that although there were no recorded paleontological resource localities are present within the project area, or within 1 mile of the project, paleontological resources have been identified on sites within approximately 1.5 miles of the proposed Project site. Additionally, the Riverside County’s Paleontological Resource Sensitivity Map (RCPTSM) identifies that the Project site is located on sedimentary rocks that have a high paleontological sensitivity. The City’s General Plan EIR also identifies the Project area as one with High Paleontological Sensitivity (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). Impact Analysis – Cultural Resources a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5? No Impact: Historic resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements, and remnants associated with a significant historic even or person(s) and/or have a historically significant style, design, or achievement. Damaging or demolition of historic resources is typically considered to be a significant impact. Impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or removal, and indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource. Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5. According to the records search conducted for this site, no resources that are considered historically significant exist on site. Therefore, no adverse impacts to historic resources would occur. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Archaeological sites are locations that contain resources associated with former human activities, and may contain such resources as human skeletal remains, waste from tool manufacture, tool concentrations, and/or discoloration or accumulation of soil or food remains. The Phase I and Phase II study results indicated that there would be no impact. However, the survey identified that because there have been past discoveries in the vicinity, the overall archaeological sensitivity of the project location remains high, and the potential of encountering subsurface prehistoric cultural remains within the project boundaries is a potential. 205 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 34 Therefore, adverse impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 will be implemented to address unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed Project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a paleontological resource as defined in 15064.5 since it is located in an area of High Paleontological Sensitivity. It is not anticipated that proposed excavations to support the proposed Project will encounter native material that could impact paleontological resources. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-2 will be implemented to address unanticipated discoveries of paleontological resources. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed Project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Should human remains be found during construction, Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would reduce any potential impacts to a level of less than significant. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. e) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code 21074? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Although the Project site is located in an area that has been home to Native American tribes for centuries, the Project site is not anticipated to contain tribal cultural resources. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and CUL-3 will be implemented to address unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources. Mitigation measures are listed at the end of this section. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): CUL-1: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified archeological monitor. In the event unanticipated archaeological resources are discovered: The Archaeological monitor shall notify the project foreman The Archaeological monitor has the authority to temporarily halt work in the area of archaeological discoveries until the resource has been evaluated All work in the vicinity of the find shall halt Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until written notification is received from the Project archaeologist 206 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 35 CUL-2: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified paleontological monitor. Paleontological monitors should be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed, to avoid construction delays, and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Monitoring will be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units as described by the San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Sciences May 2, 2017 report are not present, or if present are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. CUL-3: If human remains are encountered during the undertaking, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The local authorities must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measures. 207 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 36 VI. Geology and Soils Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: X Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Strong seismic ground shaking? Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Environmental Setting A geotechnical report was prepared for the site in 1998, and updated in 2017 (Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017). The project site is at the northern portion of the Salton Trough physiographic province. The Salton Trough is a geologic structural depression resulting from large scale regional faulting. The trough is bounded on the northeast by the San Andreas Fault and the southwest by faults of the San Jacinto Fault Zone. The Salton Trough represents the northward extension of the Gulf of California with continual in- filling with both marine and non-marine sediments since the Miocene Epoch (Southland Geotechnical, November 5, 1998). 208 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 37 Earthquake Faults A review of the current Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone maps indicate that the nearest mapped Earthquake Fault Zone is the San Andreas-Coachella fault, located approximately 6.1 mile northeast of the project site (Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017). Soils and Liquefaction Liquefaction occurs when a saturated or partially saturated soil substantially loses strength and stiffness in response to an applied stress, usually earthquake shaking or other sudden change in stress condition, causing it to behave like a liquid. Groundwater was encountered at 40 feet deep during exploration efforts in 1998. Groundwater was not encountered in 2017 sampling efforts which consisted of trench excavation to a depth of between 5 and 12 feet. Groundwater is believed to exist at a depth of 70 ft based on water level in nearby water wells in 1978 as reported in USGS Water Resources Report 91-4142 (Southland Geotechnical, November 5, 1998 and Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017). The field exploration conducted from October 29 to November 5, 1998 indicates that the surficial and subsurface soils consist generally medium dense Silty Sand, Sandy Silt, and fine Sand (SM, ML, and SP- SM). Layers of Sandy Silt to Silt (ML) exist at depths greater than 4 feet. The upper surficial soils has varying concentrations of wood branches and roots from the old citrus grove. (Southland Geotechnical, November 5, 1998). Landslides The site and the surroundings are flat, and there are no mountainous or hillside areas adjacent to the site. Wind Erosion Much of the Valley are in La Quinta is susceptible to wind and wind-blown sand hazards. This means that soils may be loosened and transported during grading and construction activities. According to the City of La Quinta’s General Plan, the project site’s Wind Erodibility Rating is “High.” Impact Analysis – Geology and Soils a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: • Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. • Strong seismic ground shaking? • Seismic related ground failure, including liquefaction? • Landslides? Less Than Significant. The Project site lies within a seismically active region of Southern California. According to Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone maps, the Project site is not located in an Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zone nor is the Project site or its immediate vicinity situated above any active faults. To minimize potential damage to the proposed access road and rock placement caused by groundshaking, 209 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 38 all construction would comply with the latest Uniform Building Code and any applicable criteria set forth by the City, and would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving the rupture of known earthquake faults. Impacts associated with the rupture of a known earthquake fault are considered less than significant. Liquefaction occurs primarily in saturated, loose, fine to medium-grained soils in areas where the ground water table is 50 feet or less below the ground surface. When these sediments are shaken, such as during an earthquake, a sudden increase in pore water pressure causes the soils to lose strength and behave as a liquid. The resulting features are called sand boils, sand blows or "sand volcanoes." Liquefaction-related effects include loss of bearing strength, ground oscillations and lateral spreading. According to the analysis conducted for the 1998 and 2002 Fairway Specific Plan approvals, the proposed project occur in a Zone Ill groundshaking zone, approximately one quarter mile east of an inferred and inactive fault. The project site can expect to experience significant groundshaking in the event of a major earthquake in the Coachella Valley. In order to mitigate the potential impacts of groundshaking on buildings throughout the City, the Building Department has implemented the Uniform Building Code, as amended, which requires reinforced construction in groundshaking zones. The Project site does not occur in an area prone to liquefaction, and its distance from an active fault makes ground rupture unlikely (Landmark, August 25, 2017). The Project will be required to meet the City’s Building standards, thereby reducing the potential impact from groundshaking hazards to a less than significant level (Warner Engineering, February 19, 2002). b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Minor soil erosion may occur during the grading and construction period of the new buildings. The project site occurs within the City's blowsand hazard area where soils at the Project site have a high potential for wind erosion. Implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2 will reduce the impacts to less than significant. Mitigation measures are listed at the end of this section. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant. Unstable soils that can result in a landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse generally occurs in when shallow groundwater liquefies soil especially during a seismic event. The Project site is generally flat and fully graded. The geotechnical reports prepared for the Project identify that liquefaction is unlikely due to groundwater being greater than 50 feet (Landmark, August 25, 2017). Therefore, the risk of soil instability is low. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant. Expansive soil is typically clay or a soil type that is prone to large volume changes (swelling and shrinking) that are directly related to changes in water content. The geotechnical report indicates that the surficial and subsurface soils consist generally medium dense Silty Sand, Sandy Silt, and fine Sand (SM, ML, and SP-SM). Layers of Sandy Silt to Silt (ML) exist at depths greater than 4 feet. The upper surficial soils had varying concentrations of wood branches and roots from the old citrus grove. 210 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 39 In arid climatic regions, granular soils have a potential to collapse upon wetting. Collapse potential tests performed in 1998 indicate a potential of 3.1 and 1.6 percent collapse upon inundation and are considered a moderate site risk. The Project will be constructed using the latest engineering and construction practices which include developing the building foundations in a manner that includes overexcavation and recompaction of the zone beneath the building pads to mitigate for the potential of hydroconsolidation caused by soil saturation from landscape irrigation or broken utility lines by overexcavation and recompaction of the zone beneath building pads. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The Project does not include the use of septic systems. Thus, no impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): GEO-1 Prior to grading plan approval, submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, a PMl0 management plan. GEO-2 For portions of the site not immediately under construction, ensure the stabilization of soils through the use of soil cement or re-vegetation, frequent watering. including watering during the evening and weekends during significant wind events; street sweeping or washing during construction, and the chemical stabilization of unpaved construction roadways. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measures. 211 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 40 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Background Lundin Development is proposing a 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center project on approximately 12 acres. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved a 100,460 square-foot mixed-use commercial center Specific Plan for the 12-acre Project Site. The approval of the Specific Plan included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The City also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR on February 19, 2013. Therefore, the analysis herein is based on the net increase of approximately 25,340 square-feet of new uses not previously reviewed or approved in the 1999 Specific Plan and subsequent 2012 Updated General Plan. CEQA and Greenhouse Gases According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4, when making a determination of the significance of greenhouse gas emissions, the “lead agency shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to (1) use a model or methodology to quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project, and which model or methodology to use.” In addition, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(c) provides that “a lead agency may consider thresholds of significance previously adopted or recommended by other public agencies or recommended by experts” on the condition that “the decision of the lead agency to adopt such thresholds is supported by substantial evidence.” The Proposed Project is located within the City of La Quinta. The City of La Quinta adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (Plan) on February 13th, 2013. The Plan provides reduction strategies and reduction measures that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions at their source and at the end use by improving operating efficiency, increasing reliance on renewable source for energy production, developing new technologies, and through conservation. These reduction measures are listed in Table 28 of the Plan and can be implemented as needed during the design phase. However, the City does not have their own thresholds of significance for greenhouse gas emissions. The City finds persuasive and reasonable the approach to determining significance of greenhouse gas emissions established by SCAQMD. Impact Analysis a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? 212 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 41 Less Than Significant. The Proposed Project is located within the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation of the Specific Plan/General Plan. The proposed mixed-use commercial uses are allowed within the CC land use area which have been reviewed and approved within the 2012 General Plan update. The project was previously reviewed and approved as the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center, Project 2002-06. Subsequently, a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality and Greenhouse Gas impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR on February 19, 2013 was adopted. Approval of the proposed revision would not require a zone change nor a General Plan Amendment. Therefore, the delta was reviewed. Emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod version 2016.3.1 (Appendix B). The analysis prepared for the Proposed Project assumed the construction of an additional 25,340 square-feet of mixed-use commercial uses on the 12-acre Project Site. Construction was anticipated to begin approximately early- 2018 and be completed in late-2018. Other parameters which were used to estimate construction emissions such as the worker and vendor trips and trip lengths were based on the CalEEMod defaults. The TIA determined that the Proposed Project would generate approximately 13,328 daily trips. Trips were broken down by land use type and land use size. The TIA also included a 20-percent reduction in traffic to account for pass-by-credit. As the Proposed Project is evaluated as the Specific Plan delta of 25,340 square-feet of new uses (approximately 20 percent greater than was approved in the Specific Plan), 4,513 daily trips (approximately 34 percent of the development based on more intense uses) were modeled to represent a worst-case scenario. Additionally, the site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The proposed Project represents approximately 0.22 FAR. Therefore, because the Project proposes to use less than the maximum allowed under the zoning, a less than significant impact is anticipated. Many gases make up the group of pollutants that are believed to contribute to global climate change. However, three gases are currently evaluated and represent the highest concentration of GHG: Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), and Nitrous oxide (N2O). SCAQMD provides guidance methods and/or Emission Factors that are used for evaluating a project’s emissions in relation to the thresholds. A threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year has been adopted by SCAQMD for non-industrial type projects as potentially significant or global warming (Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, SCAQMD, October 2008). The modeled emissions anticipated from the Proposed Project compared to the SCAQMD thresholds are shown below in Table 7 and Table 8. Table 7 Greenhouse Gas Construction Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) Source/Phase CO2 CH4 N20 Site Preparation 0.5 0.0 0.0 Grading 1.1 0.0 0.0 Building Construction 45 0.0 0.0 Paving 2.5 0.0 0.0 Architectural Coating 1.3 0.0 0.0 Total MTCO2e 47.3 SCAQMD Threshold 3,000 Significant NO Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Annual Emissions. 213 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 42 Table 8 Greenhouse Gas Operational Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) Source/Phase CO2 CH4 N20 Area 0.0 0.0 0.0 Energy 373.9 0.0 0.0 Mobile 2,045.3 0.3 0.0 Waste 23.7 1.4 0.0 Water 20.1 0.1 0.0 MTCO2e 2,510.5 SCAQMD Threshold 3,000 Significant NO Source: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Annual Emissions. As shown in Table 7 and Table 8, the Proposed Project’s emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s 3,000 MTCO2e threshold of significance and therefore would have less than significant impact for greenhouse gas emissions; no mitigation measures are required. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant. There are no existing GHG plans, policies, or regulations that have been adopted by CARB or SCAQMD that would apply to this type of emissions source. However, the operator shall comply with CARB and SCAQMD regulations related to diesel-fueled trucks, which may include among others: (1) meeting more stringent emission standards; (2) retrofitting existing engines with particulate traps; (3) use of low sulfur fuel; and (4) use of alternative fuels or equipment. It is possible that CARB may develop performance standards for Project-related activities prior to construction of the Proposed Project. In this event, these performance standards would be implemented and adhered to, and there would be no conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation. The City of La Quinta adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (Plan) on February 13th, 2013. The Plan provides reduction strategies and reduction measures that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions at their source and at the end use by improving operating efficiency, increasing reliance on renewable sources for energy production, developing new technologies, and through conservation. During the development review process the City would implement as feasible necessary development upgrades to further reduce GHG footprint. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. The Proposed Project is consistent with CARB scoping measures and therefore does not conflict with local or regional greenhouse gas plans. Additionally, the City of La Quinta requires all new development to comply with the California Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards which are designed to ensure new and existing buildings achieve energy efficiency and preserve outdoor and indoor environmental quality. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): 214 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 43 No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 215 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 44 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply VIII.Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Environmental Setting The Project site has historically been vacant. The general area surrounding the Project site consists of residential and commercial uses. Impact Analysis a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 216 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 45 Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Hazardous substances and wastes would be used during construction of the new building. These would include fuels for machinery and vehicles, new and used motor oils, and storage containers and applicators containing such materials. The potential exists for localized spills of petroleum-based products or other chemicals during construction. These spills could expose construction workers and the public to hazardous materials either directly, at the site of the spill, or indirectly, by introducing these substances into stormwater runoff. All development requiring ground disturbance would be subject to regional and local regulations, including the need for an SWPPP under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES No. CAR000002). In addition, the City requires a grading permit for all developments that would require grading. Compliance with SWRCB‘s General Construction Activity Stormwater Permit regulations requiring a SWPPP, and the grading permit required by the City would ensure hazardous materials generated during construction would not create a significant impact. Additionally, construction is anticipated be temporary, therefore any potential impacts would have a limited and temporary timeframe to occur. Potential impacts would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. The site plan also proposes a convenience fuel station which will receive routine fuel deliveries as needed. The station would be regulated and permitted by all federal and state regulations. Therefore, the regulatory permits, coupled with the implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2, will reduce the impacts to less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Additionally, as discussed in Response VII(a), a variety of hazardous substances would be used and stored during construction of the proposed Project. Accidental spills, leaks, fires, or explosions involving hazardous materials represent a potential threat to human health and the environment if not properly addressed. As proposed in Mitigation Measure HAZ- 1, a hazardous substance spill prevention plan shall be prepared and implemented, and hazardous materials spill kits shall be maintained on site for small spills. The implementation of BMPs, such as having spill kits available on equipment, would minimize the potential effect of such occurrences. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would reduce impacts to less than significant with implementation of mitigation. Mitigation Measures are listed at the end of this section. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. There is no existing or proposed school within one-quarter mile of the Project site. There- fore, there is no impact. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. The proposed Project is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites, and as a result would not create a significant hazard to the public or environment and there would be no impact. 217 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 46 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. There are several airports in the vicinity, but none are located within two miles of the Project site. These airports include: the Bermuda Dunes Airport, located south of Interstate and West of Jefferson Street in Bermuda Dunes, and the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, a public airport located east of Harrison Street and between Airport Boulevard on the north and Avenue 60 on the south. The Bermuda Dunes Airport is approximately 4 miles north of the Project site, and the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is located approximately 7 miles southeasterly of the Project site. Therefore, there is no impact. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. There are no private airstrips in vicinity the Project area. Therefore, there is no impact. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The project site is currently vacant, and does not include facilities for emergency response. Additionally, no part of the Project design would impede or redirect emergency response within the area. The site provides for ingress and egress that can be used for emergency response to the various businesses proposed. Therefore, there is no impact. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. The Project site is located in an area that consists of vacant land and retail uses in a desert setting, and not located adjacent to an area susceptible to wildland fires. Therefore, there is no impact. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): HAZ – 1 A hazardous spill prevention plan shall be prepared by the Applicant and submitted to the City for approval to minimize the likelihood of a spill shall be prepared prior to construction. The plan shall state the actions that would be required if a spill occurs to prevent contamination of surface waters and provide for cleanup of the spill. The plan shall follow Federal, state, and local safety guidelines and standards to avoid increased exposure to these pollutants. HAZ – 2 If a contaminated area is encountered during construction, construction shall cease in the vicinity of the contaminated area. The construction contractor shall notify all appropriate authorities, including the EPA and the City. If necessary, the contaminated site shall be remediated to minimize the potential for exposure of the public and to allow the Project to be safety constructed. 218 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 47 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply IX. Hydrology and Water Quality: Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite? X d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding onsite or offsite? X e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Environmental Setting Although the climate in the Coachella Valley and the Planning Area are generally temperate, seasonal storms can produce significant amounts of precipitation within short periods of time. Winter storms are 219 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 48 responsible for much of the area’s annual rainfall, and usually occur between November and April. However, the region and surrounding mountains may also experience localized thunderstorms at other times, especially during the summer monsoon season. Rapid snowmelt from the mountains may also result in flooding downslope (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). Areas within the City of La Quinta are subject to flash flooding along natural or man-made channels and sheet flooding across the valley floor. Although of short duration, flash floods result in high peak water volumes and velocities, which are frequently intensified by features of the local natural and built environment (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). There are no dams in the Project vicinity, and the Whitewater Rivers is located nearly 10 miles to the east of the Project site. The Project site not considered at risk from inundation from dam failure or flooding hazard from levee damage or failure along the Whitewater River or from above-ground water storage tanks at higher elevations within and adjacent to La Quinta (Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012). Impact Analysis a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant. All development requiring ground disturbance would be subject to regional and local regulations, including the need for an SWPPP under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order No. 2009-0009- DWQ, NPDES No. CAR000002). In addition, the City requires a grading permit for all developments that would require grading. Compliance with SWRCB‘s General Construction Activity Stormwater Permit regulations requiring a SWPPP, and the grading permit required by the City would ensure water quality standards are not exceeded. Additionally, Mitigation Measure HYD-1 will require the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and subject to approval by RWQCB. The Project will create an impermeable surface over much of the entire site when complete. This can increase the potential for pollutants to occur in surface water primarily be from cars parked in the parking lot leaking fluids. However, the project includes an underground system to collect all of the stormwater runoff from the project site. The WQMP prepared for the site as part of Mitigation Measure HYD-1 will also address the requirements and operations of the underground system. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact on water quality. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less Than Significant. During construction, the project will employ various measures for dust control including the use of water that is readily available from the Coachella Valley Water District. The water used during construction will be temporary, and water will not be the sole method used for dust control. Water-conscious measures will be used as part of the final design, including installation of water-efficient features such as water-efficient toilets and drought-tolerant landscaping. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite? 220 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 49 Less Than Significant. The Project site has been previously graded and is on level ground completely surrounded by urban development, vacant land, and paved streets. Further, there are no streams or rivers on the Project site or its adjacent vicinity. The construction phase of the Project would involve standard best management practices (BMP’s) associated with commercial development, such as drainage to city sewers in the parking lots, curbs, and landscaping to allow water percolation during rain events. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding onsite or offsite? Less Than Significant. Refer to Response IX(c), above. The Project site is surrounded by residential and retail uses, and is not located directly adjacent to any stream or river. An underground stormwater collection system will be installed as part of the project to capture all of the stormwater runoff from the site. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant. The project includes the construction of an underground stormwater system to handle all of the stormwater from the site, and little to no water is anticipated to be collected by the City’s stormwater drainage systems. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less Than Significant. As previously discussed, the proposed Project proposes to construct a project that will utilize an underground stormwater collection system. Uses for some of the buildings include a gas station. The gas station would be constructed to the latest standards and required to comply with State and federal requirements for this use. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The Project does not propose to construct housing. As a result, construction and operation of the Project would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Map or Federal Flood Insurance Map. Therefore, no impacts would occur under this criterion as a result of the Project. h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant. The City’s General Plan identifies that the Project site is within FEMA Flood Hazard Zone D which is an area of undetermined risk. Therefore, the development of the proposed Project would not place structures within a 100 year flood area and would not impede or result in the redirection of flood flows in the City. A less than significant impact would occur. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less Than Significant. The Whitewater River is located nearly 10 miles east of the site, and the Project site is not located in proximity to a levee or dam. Therefore, there is no impact from flooding that could occur as a result of a dam failure or levee breech. However, the Coachella Valley is subject to thunderstorms that can create flash flooding. The new buildings would be required to adhere to current 221 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 50 California Building Code regulations for commercial development. Additionally, the project includes an underground system to collect all of the stormwater runoff from the project site. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. There are no bodies of water in the vicinity of the Project site that are capable of producing seiche activity. There is also no potential for tsunamis in the Project area as the Pacific Ocean is more than 150 miles to the southwest of the Project area. As discussed above, the City’s General Plan has not identified the Project site as being in an area susceptible to mudflows as the topography of the site is generally flat and a sufficient distance from hills and mountains to ensure that mudflows in this area would not occur. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): HYD-1 Prior to Project approval, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that shall, at minimum, include the following: Identifies all project related pollutants, impacts to the site’s hydrologic condition, and potential impacts to local waterways caused by Project post-construction runoff; Identifies BMPs required to remove pollutants from the Projects’ post construction runoff and prevent downstream hydromodification; Identifies parties responsible for long term operation and maintenance activities of all BMPs Identifies the design, operation and maintenance of the underground stormwater collection system. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 222 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 51 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply X. Land Use and Planning: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community?X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Environmental Setting The site is located on a vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 2, and Figure 3). The site is bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by a retention basin with residential development west of the basin, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan of Land Use and associated parcel map to allow for the development of 100,460 square feet of a supermarket- anchored shopping center with adjacent retail pads on 12.5 acres at the corner of Jefferson Street 50th Avenue. The parcel is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The Specific Plan adoption included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. In 2002, an amendment to the Specific Plan was also adopted. To date, that project has not been constructed. On February 19. 2013, the City of La Quinta adopted the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its 2035 General Plan (SCH# 2010111094) which included the impacts of adding to commercial uses within the City, including the approved Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was also adopted with the General Plan EIR for environmental impacts that could not be mitigated to a level below significance for: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic (Resolution 2013- 009). Currently, the Lundin Development is requesting authorization from the City to construct 125,800 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center and adjacent retail pads on the 12.5-acre site at the corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue, within the same area of the previously-approved Specific Plan. Proposed uses within the commercial center development are similar to the previously approved plan, and include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store. 223 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 52 Impact Analysis a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The Project proposes to develop a shopping center on a contiguous vacant 12.5-acre parcel as a retail center. Retail uses exist across Jefferson Street on the east. There are no surrounding land uses that would currently conflict with the proposed use. Therefore, there is no impact. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant. The site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) by the City of La Quinta. The subject property has received prior approvals as a commercial center in 1998 and in 2002. The project is proposed to be developed as a commercial center in accordance with the municipal code standards of the Community Commercial zone. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Less Than Significant. The City of La Quinta falls entirely within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) area. The site is a vacant dirt parcel that has been previously disturbed. The subject parcel is not located within or adjacent to a Conservation Area. The CVMSHCP requires a habitat assessment for the burrowing owl (BUOW). If habitat for the BUOW is present, a focused survey is required. The Biological Resource Assessment prepared for the project (Jericho, May 23, 2017) determined that there was no suitable BUOW habitat, nor were there signs of BUOW activity. No suitable BUOW habitat was identified on site during the burrowing owl habitat assessment survey. Therefore, no additional protocol-level focused surveys will be required. No other listed or sensitive species or sensitive habitat was observed on the site. The subject parcel does not contain suitable habitat for any of the sensitive species that have been documented in the project vicinity. The Project must also comply with local conservation regulations which require payment of a mitigation fee at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, implementation of the Project will not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 224 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 53 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XI. Mineral Resources: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Environmental Setting The Project site is currently vacant, and no mineral mining occurs onsite or in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. The City of La Quinta General Plan (City of La Quinta, February 19, 2013) identifies the Project site as mapped within Mineral Resource Zone – 1, defined as areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood for their presence exists. Impact Analysis a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The Project site is currently vacant and is zoned Community Commercial (CC) by the City of La Quinta. No mineral resources are known to occur onsite nor is the Project site zoned for mining uses. No impact would occur. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. Refer to Response XI a), above. No impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 225 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 54 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XII. Noise: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Environmental Setting Noise – General Sound is a physical disturbance in a medium, such as air, that is capable of being detected by the human ear. Sound waves in air are caused by variations in pressure above and below the static value of atmospheric pressure. Sound is measured in units of decibels (dB) on a logarithmic scale. The “pitch” (high or low) of the sound is a description of frequency, which is measured in Hertz (Hz). Most common environmental sounds are a composite of frequencies. A normal human ear can usually detect sounds within frequencies from 20 to 20,000 Hz. However, humans are most sensitive to frequencies in the range of 500 to 4,000 Hz. Certain frequencies are given more “weight” during assessment because human hearing is not equally sensitive to all frequencies of sound. The A-weighted decibel (dBA) scale corresponds to the sensitivity range for human hearing. Noise levels capable of being heard by humans are measured in dBA. A noise level change of 3 dBA or less is barely perceptible to average human hearing. However, a 5 dBA change in noise level is clearly noticeable. A 10 dBA change is perceived as a doubling or halving of noise loudness, while a 20 dBA change is considered a “dramatic change” in loudness. Sound from a source spreads out as it travels away from the source, and the sound pressure level diminishes with distance. Individual sound sources are considered “point sources” when the distance from 226 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 55 the source is large compared to the size of the source (e.g., construction equipment, and turbines). Sound from a point source radiates hemispherically, which yields a 6 dB sound level reduction for each doubling of the distance from the source. If the sound source is long in one dimension, the source is considered a “line source,” (i.e., roadways and railroads). Sound from a line source radiates cylindrically, which typically yields a 3 dB sound level reduction for each doubling of the distance from the source. The metrics for evaluating the community noise environment are based on measurements of the noise levels over a period of time. These metrics are used in order to characterize and evaluate the cumulative noise impacts. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) represents a 24-hour A-weighted sound level average from midnight to midnight, where sound levels during the evening hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. have an added 5 dB weighting, and nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. have an added 10 dB weighting. Potential noise from construction equipment to be used for this project are included on Table 9. Table 9 Construction Equipment Noise Emission Levels Equipment Typical Noise Level (dBA) 50 ft from Source* Backhoe 80 Compactor 82 Concrete Mixer 85 Concrete Pump 82 Dozer 85 Grader 85 Loader 85 Scarifier 83 Scraper 89 Truck 88 FTA, May 2006 *Data taken from EPA Report - EPA 550/9-76-004 Vibration – General Sources of vibration included geotech drill rigs, excavators, dump trucks, backhoes, and other general construction equipment. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has developed vibration impact thresholds for noise-sensitive buildings, residences, and institutional land uses. These are usually measured as “vibration decibels” or VdB. According to the FTA guidelines, a vibration level of 65 VdB is the threshold of perceptibility for humans. These thresholds are typically 80 VdB at residences and buildings where people normally sleep (e.g., nearby residences and daycare facilities) and 83 VdB at institutional buildings (e.g., schools and churches). The FTA guidelines also state that, for a significant impact to occur, vibration levels must exceed 80 VdB during infrequent events (FTA, May 2006). 227 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 56 Typical vibration levels from project equipment are based on the FTA guidelines provided in Table 10. Table 10 Vibration Source Levels for Typical Construction Equipment Equipment Vibration Level at 25 feet (VdB) Large bulldozer 87 Caisson drilling 87 Loaded trucks 86 Jackhammer 79 Small bulldozer 58 Source: FTA 2006 Project Location The site is immediately adjacent to a stormwater detention basin along the northern and western edges, with residences abutting the detention basin’s west and north sides. The basin provides for an approximately 50- to 120-foot buffer between the Project and the residence backyard. Three residences on the southwest area of the project site directly abut the project site. Residences exist to the south of the Project site, just beyond 50th Avenue. Commercial uses exist to the east of the project, just beyond the site’s border with Jefferson Street. Local Noise Ordinances The residential areas to the north and west and south of the Project are zoned Low Density Residential. The City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.100.210 “Noise control,” identifies this land use as “noise sensitive.” The City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 6.08.050 “Disturbances by construction noises” limit construction noise impacts, predominantly through restriction of times and days when work may be carried out: Construction is not permitted on Sundays or defined Holidays Construction is restricted to 8am to 5pm on Saturdays Between October 1st and April 30th, construction is restricted 7am to 5:30pm Between May 1st and September 30th, construction is restricted to 6am to 7pm. The City’s code also identifies limits for operational noise for the residential and non-residential land uses. Operational noise shall not exceed the levels set out in the Noise Standard, or the existing ambient noise. For the “noise sensitive” properties to the South, West and North, operational noise from the project shall not exceed: 65 dB(A) between 7am and 10pm 50 dB(A) between 10pm and 7am For the “other non-residential” land uses to the East operational noise from the project shall not exceed: 75 dB(A) between 7am and 10pm 228 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 57 65 dB(A) between 10pm and 7am Project Noise Studies Noise studies for the Project were prepared in 2002 as part of the Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 approval and in 2017 and 2018 to serve as an update (Appendix E). The 2002 study identified that both Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue were impacted, and exceed 60 dBA CNEL. The study identified that all new development is required to mitigate to the City's standards for noise, as required in the General Plan (Table EH-1) (Warner Engineering, February 19, 2002). The 2017 noise study also concluded that areas along Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue were impacted and exceeded the 60dBA criteria. Ambient noise measured along various locations along the north and west perimeter of the site, nearest to the residences, measured between 53.9 and 60 dBA. The study determined that the main sources of noise across the site are noise from road traffic on 50th Avenue and Jefferson street, other noise sources included HVAC systems serving the houses to the north, west and south of the site and from HVAC serving the commercial buildings to the east, across Jefferson Street. There was also minor noise from distant aircraft and birdsong (Antonio Acoustics, June 16, 2017, Appendix E). Noise is also anticipated from the speakers of the drive-through eating establishments, as well as vehicle doors closing in the parking lot. The Project is proposed approximately 150 feet between the closest development building and the residences to the south. The residences to the south already have a concrete masonry boundary wall. Impact Analysis a)Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant. The noise study (Appendix D) identified that the noise from the site through the day would not exceed the measured levels at the edges of the site closest to the residences, and that the noise from the HVAC units on the buildings and parking does not exceed the City of La Quinta daytime noise criteria of 60dB(A) at any residence. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact. b)Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant. The noise related to construction would include those generated from the use of heavy equipment at the site or vehicles transporting materials. Activities that could generate groundborne vibration include pile-driving and demolition; however, pile-driving and significant demolition is not anticipated to be utilized during construction. Some construction activities would occur within approximately 30 to 75 feet of residences, with residences to the southwest being the closest receptors. Screening-level calculations based on the FTA Guidelines (Table 10) indicate that vibration levels associated with these activities would have attenuated to a level of approximately 78 VdB at the nearest residence given the intervening distance. This analysis shows that vibration levels at all identified sensitive receptors were below the threshold of 80 VdB. 229 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 58 Construction activities would be temporary and would not expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels due to the adherence of the City’s General Plan. Therefore, groundborne vibration impacts associated with proposed construction activities will be less than significant. c)A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The 2017 noise study and 2018 amendment measured ambient noise levels along various locations of the Project site perimeter, and projected the potential future noise levels (Table 11). The studies identified a variety of potential operations noise sources that will contribute to a permanent increase in ambient noise: HVAC systems serving the buildings Commercial loading and unloading Noise from parking and the gas station Noise from speakers at the drive-through eating establishments Noise from car doors closing at night To project the potential increase in ambient noise, the 2017 noise study assumed that the HVAC for each new building would not exceed a sound power level of 100dB(A), (equivalent to 68 dB(A) at 50 feet). In the absence of a national standard for the US, the parking lot methodology was based on ISO 9603-2 1996 (Antonio Acoustics, June 16, 2017, Appendix E). Table 11 Existing and Projected Future Operational Noise Location Measurement Location and Distance from Sensitive Receptors Measured level, dB(A) New noise from HVAC and parking, dB(A) New noise exceeds measured? 1 Southwestern site perimeter, close to Avenue 50, between proposed parking and residences 64.2 52 No 2 Adjacent to boundary wall, southwestern site perimeter, approximately 200 feet north of Location 1, between proposed parking and residences 55.9 53.1 No 3 Adjacent to boundary wall, western site perimeter, approximately 90 feet between proposed back of proposed Pavilions grocery store and residences 53.9 50.4 No 4 Adjacent to boundary wall, western site perimeter, approximately 200 feet between proposed loading dock for proposed Pavilions grocery store and residences 60.0 54.5 No 5 Adjacent to boundary wall, western site perimeter, approximately 200 feet between proposed loading dock for Pavilions grocery store and residences 55.6 55.4 No 6 Adjacent to boundary wall, western site perimeter, approximately 150 feet between proposed parking and residences 58.3 54.3 No 7 Northeast perimeter corner, adjacent to Jefferson Street, not near residences 68.2 52.3 No 8 East site perimeter, adjacent to Jefferson Street 68 Not Estimated No 9 Southeast site perimeter, adjacent to Jefferson Street and 65.1 Not Estimated No 230 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 59 Avenue 50, not near residences The noise studies prepared in 2002, 2017, and 2018 indicated that the ambient noise will not exceed the City’s standard. However, because the ambient noise is already close to the City’s maximum level for the area, the Project operations will include Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through NOI-5 be implemented to ensure that ambient noise levels will not exceed the City’s maximum standard. Mitigation Measures are located at the end of this section. Additionally, the noise study identified that additional screening would be appropriate to accommodate the noise from the speaker at the drive-through eating establishment and the residences along the south. Mitigation Measure NOI-6 will be implemented to reduce noise from the speakers at the drive-through, which will ensure impacts are less than significant. Mitigation measures are located at the end of this section. The 2018 noise study regarding vehicle doors closing also identified that for the closest parking space to 1 meter from the windows of the closest house, the LAMax,F noise level is 60dB for car door slams. This is the worst case scenario and noise from the majority of the parking spaces will be substantially less than this. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact from car doors closing the in the parking lot. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. While the exact construction method and equipment has yet to be determined, noise from construction is expected to occasionally reach 85 dB(A) at 50 feet from the louder noise sources. The timing of construction work is limited to the City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 6.08.050 “Disturbances by construction noises.” However, to reduce construction noise to less than significant levels, Mitigation Measures NOI-7 and NOI-8 are required. Mitigation measures are located at the end of this section. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no airport land use plans within the project area. Therefore, there is no impact. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no private airstrips in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, no impact would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: All construction activity shall be limited to the hours of construction permitted by Municipal Code Section 6.08.050. All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 231 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 60 All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units. All on-site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m. The proposed perimeter wall shall be 8 feet in height. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises Turn off idling equipment and vehicles All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers 232 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 61 All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measures. 233 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 62 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XIII. Population and Housing: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is one of nine cities in the Coachella Valley, and offers numerous destination resorts. The population was 37,467 at the 2010 census, up from 23,694 at the 2000 census. Impact Analysis a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant. The Project includes the construction of an approximate 12.5-acre vacant lot for the operation of a retail center designed to serve the existing population. Therefore, the Project will not indirectly induce an increase in population; the impact will be less than significant. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. There are no existing houses on the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project will not displace any housing, or require the construction of replacement housing. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. There are no homeless camps on the Project site, therefore, there is no impact. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. 234 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 63 Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 235 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 64 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XIV. Public Services: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Recreation/Parks? X e) Other public facilities? X Environmental Setting The City contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department for fire protection services, with a total of six stations located throughout the City, all staffed by full time, paid firefighters and volunteers (Terra Nova, July 2012). Police services are contracted through the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department which provides two Police Department offices in the City, and a jail facility in Thermal (Terra Nova, July 2012). The Project site is within the Desert Sands Unified School District boundaries. The DSUSD serves students located west of Jefferson Street and north of Avenue 48. The Harry S Truman Elementary School and the La Quinta Middle School are located on Avenue 50, approximately one mile west of the Project site. The City of La Quinta Community Services Department maintains numerous small pocket parks, neighborhood parks, community parks, and trails throughout incorporated portions of the City. Pocket parks are generally less than one acre, and provide small playgrounds, tot lots, and passive seating areas. These small parks tend to be built within neighborhoods and serve local residents. One of the largest parks within the City of La Quinta is the Lake Cahuilla County Park operated by the County of Riverside. Lake Cahuilla is an 845-acre park located in the southwestern portion of incorporated La Quinta. The Desert Recreation District owns and operates the La Quinta Community Park in La Quinta, which is a 6.5-acre park that includes a 5,000 square foot community center, baseball diamonds, basketball courts, a playground and picnic pavilion (Terra Nova, July 2012). Impact Analysis Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 236 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 65 a) Fire protection? Less Than Significant. As previously discussed, the Project site is served by the City of La Quinta Fire Department. The nearest fire station to the Project site is located approximately 2.3miles southwest of the site at 78111 Avenue 52. The proposed project will be developed in compliance with applicable provisions of the City’s Municipal Codes and all applicable provisions of the adopted and applicable Building, Construction and Fire Codes. Additionally, the fire department will review all plans submitted to the City and the applicant is required to comply with all development requirements recommended by the Fire Department. Additionally, the applicant is required to pay impact fees to assist the fire department in offsetting potential impacts. Given the Project’s compliance with development requirements, impacts to fire services are anticipated to be minimal. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. b) Police Protection? Less Than Significant. As previously discussed, the Project site is served by the City of La Quinta’s police services. The assigned police station for the Project site is located at 86625 Airport Blvd., Thermal, approximately 6 miles to the southeast. However, La Quinta police and Riverside County Sheriff’s routinely patrol the Project vicinity given the urban nature of the area. Response times to the Project site will vary, depending on the nature of the call. The Project provides for state-of-art security provisions in areas such as outdoor lighting and adequate ingress and egress for emergency vehicles. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. c) Schools? No Impact. The Project is commercial in nature and does not propose uses that would directly or indirectly induce population growth, and thus would not generate demand for additional schools. No impact would occur. d) Recreation/Parks? No Impact. The Project does not propose uses that would directly or indirectly induce population growth, and thus would not generate demand for additional parks. Therefore, there is no impact. e) Other Services? No Impact. The Project does not propose uses that would directly or indirectly induce population growth, and thus would not generate demand for other public facilities. Additionally, the applicant is required to pay an impact fee that will assist the City in funding maintenance of city infrastructure. Therefore, there is no impact to this criterion. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no mitigation measures are required. 237 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 66 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XV. Recreation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Environmental Setting The Project is to construct an approximate 12.5-acre vacant lot for a retail center. The Project site is not currently utilized for recreation purposes, nor will the use induce growth that would require the construction of additional recreational facilities. Impact Analysis a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The Project does not include uses that would directly or indirectly induce population growth, therefore, an increase in the use of existing recreational facilities in the City is not anticipated. Therefore, there is no impact. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The Project site is not currently used for recreational purposes and does not propose development that would increase existing recreational uses. Therefore, there is no impact. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 238 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 67 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XVI.Transportation/Traffic: Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? X b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access?X f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Environmental Setting The proposed Project is located in the City of La Quinta, bordered on the north by Derek Alan Drive (a private street owned by the Renaissance Homeowners Association) and residential development that fronts Derek Alan Drive, on the west by a retention basin followed by residential development, on the east by Jefferson Street and commercial development, and on the south by Avenue 50 and residential development. Regional access to the site can be accommodated via Interstate 10 and Hwy 111. A traffic study was performed in July 2017 to evaluate the traffic ingress and egress proposed for Jefferson Street (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix F). Access for the development project is proposed via four driveways: three limited-access (no left-turns out) driveways and one full- access unsignalized driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 400 feet from the Jefferson Street signalized intersection. It should be noted that the one driveway into the shopping center from Derek Alan Drive, as previously identified on the previously-approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, has been removed with this current 239 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 68 proposed Project. The previously-approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan had included a driveway from Derek Alan Drive to the shopping center as a convenience to the residents in the residential development to the north and west. However, due to resident concerns regarding unwanted traffic in the neighborhood after the residential development was constructed, the driveway access from Derek Alan Drive has been eliminated from the “Pavilion Palms” project as amended. At the project location, Jefferson Street is a six-lane, two-way arterial roadway with a raised median and serves as one of the main thoroughfares in the area. Avenue 50 is a two-way roadway with one westbound lane and two eastbound lanes. At the intersection, each approach has one dedicated left-turn lane and one dedicated right-turn lane, except the southbound approach, which has two left-turn lanes. The City of La Quinta has published Engineering Bulletin 06-13 (Appendix G) which applies to site access and gives criteria and methodologies for completing traffic studies. Regarding site access, it states the following: SITE ACCESS Auxiliary lanes shall be installed on all primary arterial, secondary arterial and higher order street classifications according to the following criteria: A left-turn deceleration lane with taper and storage length is required for any driveway with a projected peak hour left ingress turning volume estimated to be 25 vehicles per hour (vph) or greater. The taper length shall be included as part of the required deceleration lane length. A right-turn deceleration lane is required for any driveway with a projected peak hour right ingress turning volume estimated to be 50 vph or greater. The taper length shall be included as part of the required deceleration lane length. Pocket storage length requirements shall be based on individual project characteristics. A right-turn deceleration lane should be considered for lower turning volumes on high volume streets (e.g. Washington Avenue, Highway 111). A left-turn deceleration lane should be considered for locations where left turning vehicles would be required to queue in a high speed (> 40mph) through lane. Installation recommendations for deceleration lanes and related intersection turning movement distributions shown in the final traffic study report will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. The Project includes the following traffic control features: One additional westbound through lane on Avenue 50 along the project frontage, continuing east of the signalized intersection. Extend the eastbound dedicated storage lane on Avenue 50 at the signalized intersection to the proposed full-access driveway (the easternmost driveway on Avenue 50) an additional 110 feet for a total storage of 360 feet. Install a right-turn overlap operation for the southbound right-turn movement signal phase. These proposed improvements are integrated into the project design to improve operational capacity by providing increased lane and storage capacity for the westbound through and eastbound left-turn movements as well as more green time for the southbound right-turn movement (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix F). The following tables identify the results of the traffic study prepared for the project: 240 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 69 Table 12 Existing Conditions – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street Scenario Eastbound Left Design Queue* Intersection Level-of-Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Period 1.5 Qavg Delay (sec/veh) LOS Volume/Capacity Ratio AM Peak Hour 180 ft 43 D 0.50 MD Peak Hour 240 ft 47 D 0.47 PM Peak Hour 180 ft 39 D 0.45 * Length of available storage in EBL turn pocket: approximately 250 ft. Table 13 Opening Day – With Project – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street Scenario Eastbound Left Design Queue* Intersection Level-of-Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Period 1.5 Qavg Delay (sec/veh) LOS Volume/Capacity Ratio AM Peak Hour 220 ft 39 D 0.46 MD Peak Hour 240 ft 45 D 0.53 PM Peak Hour 220 ft 45 D 0.52 * Length of available storage in EBL turn pocket: approximately 400 ft. Table 14 Future Buildout (Year 2035) – With Project – Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street Scenario Eastbound Left Design Queue* Intersection Level-of-Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Period 1.5 Qavg Delay (sec/veh) LOS Volume/Capacity Ratio AM Peak Hour 240 ft 43 D 0.52 MD Peak Hour 300 ft 47 D 0.61 PM Peak Hour 240 ft 46 D 0.59 * Length of available storage in EBL turn pocket: approximately 400 ft. Impact Analysis a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Less Than Significant. Per the City of La Quinta General Plan, the parcel is zoned for commercial use; therefore, the development project is already accounted for in the City’s traffic growth forecasting. Less than significant impacts would occur. Additionally, the site zoning is Community Commercial, which 241 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 70 allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The proposed Project represents approximately 0.22 FAR. Therefore, because the Project proposes less than the maximum allowed under the zoning, a less than significant impact is anticipated. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The flow of vehicle traffic is frequently described using the level of service (LOS) scale, which is a measurement of operational characteristics of traffic flow on a roadway or at the intersection of roadways, based on traffic volumes and facility type. Traffic operations are assessed using levels ranging from “A” to “F,” with “A” representing the highest (best) level of service in terms of travel speed, delay, maneuverability, driver comfort, and convenience. In general, the following descriptions apply to the qualitative levels described above: “A”- free flow; “B” - reasonably free flow; “C” - stable flow; “D” - approaching unstable flow; “E” - unstable flow; and “F” – forced or breakdown flow. The 2017 traffic study identified that approximately13,328 net new vehicle trips will be generated by the project, assuming a conservative 20 percent pass-by trip rate. It is estimated that approximately 1,066 net new trips will occur in the AM peak hour and approximately 1,359 net new trips will occur in the PM peak hour (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix F). The City of La Quinta conducted a Left-turn Queue Study in December 2017, which studied the queuing at the dedicated eastbound left turn storage lane on Avenue 50 at the intersection with Jefferson Street. The study was comprised of 329 signal cycles over two days. The longest queue experienced during the entire study period was 15 cars and that occurred one time over the two days. In accordance with the City of La Quinta’s Engineering Bulletin 06-13 (EB 06-13) left-turn pockets do not need to be designed to the longest possible vehicle queue length but to the 95th percentile queue. In accordance with EB 06-13, the 95th percentile queue length was computed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology to be 11 vehicles and 220 feet in length. Currently, the dedicated eastbound left turn storage lane on Avenue 50 at the intersection of Jefferson Street is approximately 250 feet long. Per the 2017 traffic study, the worst-case queue length of the eastbound left turn lane at Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street at Project opening day will be approximately 240 feet long. With the project, and area buildout, by the year 2035 the traffic study indicated that in the worst-case scenario, the eastbound lane queue length needed would be approximately 300 ft. The Project proposes to extend the eastbound left storage lane to approximately 360 feet, which is greater than the requirements of EB 06-13 and greater than the requirements of the HCM Methodology. The proposed Project improvements listed below will accommodate the projected traffic loading at the intersection. Additionally, the City of La Quinta provides automated traffic light timing at the intersection. The automated timing allows for demand-response/service-convenience timing to the intersection to accommodate better traffic flow at peak times as necessary. The July 2017 traffic study indicated that without the project, the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 will operate at LOS D, assuming a 2 percent ambient growth rate in the area (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix F, Table 3). Assuming the ambient area growth, plus the new expected project trips, as well as the additional westbound through lane capacity, and implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 and project improvements listed above, the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is expected to operate at its current LOS D, which is an acceptable level of service per the 242 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 71 General Plan and EB 06-13, and the proposed full-access driveway on Avenue 50 will operate at LOS A at opening day conditions. Therefore, the impact of this criterion is anticipated to be less than significant with mitigation. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The buildings are proposed to be one story, and approximately 22 feet from floor to roof line. This is consistent with the height of the buildings in the surrounding area. Additionally, there are no design elements of the Project that would result in a potential change in air traffic patterns. No impacts would occur. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant. The Project includes the following traffic control features: One additional westbound through lane on Avenue 50 along the project frontage, continuing east of the signalized intersection. Extend the eastbound dedicated storage lane on Avenue 50 at the signalized intersection to the proposed full-access driveway (the easternmost driveway on Avenue 50) to an additional 110 feet for a total storage of 360 feet. Install a right-turn overlap operation for the southbound right-turn movement signal phase. The Project will allow for two driveways onto Avenue 50, spaced approximately at 460 feet and 720 feet, respectively, from the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. Both driveways are spaced from the intersection in a manner that provides good sight distance and ample turning distance from the intersection. The eastern driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 460 feet west of the Jefferson Street intersection, will allow for full movement of both left and right turns onto Avenue 50 thereby providing users access to points east of the Project. Shared left-turn and right-turn markings are specifically outlined in Chapter 3 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and such movements are generally allowed at many corner gas stations throughout Southern California. The western driveway on Avenue 50, approximately 720 feet west the intersection of Jefferson Street, will be restricted to right turns only. As stated above, the driveway from Derek Alan Drive was eliminated due to concerns from surrounding residents. The traffic consultant for the project has stated that it would be unlikely for motorists driving along Jefferson Street to the shopping center would use this driveway. This elimination would have little to no impact on site circulation or on-street circulation/access since it was originally designed to accommodate residents living in the adjacent residential neighborhood. There would be no negative impact for residents using the shopping center and no negative impact for residents accessing their neighborhood since they would still have access to the center from Jefferson Drive and Avenue 50. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. 243 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 72 e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. As previously discussed, the Project would be developed within vacant land, and construction is short-term. Thus, implementation of the Project would not impede or inhibit emergency access. No impacts would occur. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Less Than Significant. The Project would be developed within vacant land, and does not propose long- term construction impacts to the surrounding street system. The SunLine transit agency provides bus service in the region. SunLine currently provides no service within proximity to the project site, and the closest bus stop is located approximately 1.5 miles from the project, at Washington and Avenue 50. SunLine has no plans to install a bus stop at the project location (SunLine Transit, October 3, 2017). The Project includes non-meandering sidewalks along the perimeter, and interior sidewalks offer ADA- compliant access to the perimeter sidewalks. Therefore, the Project can accommodate transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the future. Thus, implementation of the Project would not conflict with public transit and alternative transportation facilities. No impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: The proposed site plan shall be redesigned to provide at least 90 feet of stacking at all access points or dedicated right turn into the driveways shall be provided. If one of these standards cannot be met, the applicable access point shall be eliminated. Note: Since the approval of the original Specific Plan, the site plan has been revised to provide at least 90 feet of stacking within the development at all access points through a combination of internal stacking and/or dedicated right turns into the driveways. Therefore, this mitigation measure is no longer applicable to the currently Proposed project. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): TRAF-1 Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 244 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 73 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or X b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. X Environmental Setting CRM Tech prepared two studies for the Project site. The first consisted of Phase I and Phase II cultural assessment conducted in 1998 and 1995 for approximate 50 acres of undeveloped land as part of Tentative Parcel Map No. 29052 and Tentative Tract Map No. 29053, which included a residential development and the current commercial Project site. The study was part of the environmental impact review process for the proposed subdivision and development of the property, as required by the City of La Quinta, Lead Agency for the project, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC §21000, et seq.). The second study was conducted in June 2017 and consisted of a historical/archaeological resources records search, historical background review, and an archaeological field inspection of the approximately 12-acre Project site. The CRM research concluded that no “historic properties,” “historical resources,” or “tribal cultural resources” are present within or adjacent to the Project area. However, CRM identified that there have been previous discoveries in the Project vicinity, an overall high sensitivity to archaeological resources on the Project site, and the potential to encounter subsurface prehistoric cultural remains within the project boundaries. Therefore, CRM TECH recommended that all grading, grubbing, trenching, excavations, and other earth-moving activities in the project area be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. This information and mitigation has been identified in Section V of this document. While the Phase II cultural resources investigation indicated that there were minimal subsurface artifacts recovered from the Phase II survey, the project area is in an area that has high prehistoric sensitivity. Additionally, the project is adjacent to the Chemehuevi Traditional Use Area. For these reasons, the 245 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 74 project area has the possibility of inadvertent discoveries, which may have significant impacts on potential cultural resources that concern the Tribe. There is an increased possibility of encountering cultural resources during the construction processes that may take place because of cultural resources recorded within the project's boundaries, and it is in the vicinity of an area with high archaeological sensitivity. Avoidance, if feasible, would negate adverse effects on the project. CRM TECH, recommended that a qualified archaeologist monitor all grading, grubbing, trenching, excavations, and other earth-moving activities in the project area. Impact Analysis a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), No Impact. There are no resources that have been identified as eligible for listing to the California Register of Historic Places. Therefore, there is no impact. b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. There are no resources supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. Therefore, there is no impact. However, there have been past discoveries in the vicinity, therefore overall archaeological sensitivity of the project location remains high, and the potential of encountering subsurface prehistoric cultural remains within the project boundaries is a potential. Implementation of TCR-1 will reduce the potential impacts to potential undetermined discoveries to less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): TRC-1 Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians or Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians should be present during the initial grading/ground disturbing activities. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse effects are anticipated with the inclusion of the above mitigation measure. 246 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 75 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XVIII.Utilities and Service Systems: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f) Be served by a landfill(s) with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Environmental Setting Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to construct a 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on a 12-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Proposed uses within the commercial center development include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 2, Figure 3). The Assessor Parcel Numbers for this Project are: APNs: 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602- 180-013, and 602-180-014. Per the City of La Quinta General Plan, the Project site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) for commercial use. Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). Its source of water is groundwater and import water. Wastewater services is also provided by the CVWD. The Project site will be served by the Mid-Valley Water Reclamation Plant. The CVWD reports that it annually treats nearly 6.3 billion gallons of 247 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 76 wastewater from throughout the Coachella Valley. The CVWD also has the capacity to increase its wastewater treatment as the Coachella Valley’s population grows. Solid waste in the City is served by Burrtec Waste Recycling Services which transports the waste to the Edom Hill Transfer Station, located in the City of Cathedral City. From the transfer station, the waste is transported to one of three regional landfills: Lamb Canyon, Badlands or El Sobrante, each of which has remaining long-term capacity. Burrtec also provides solid waste and greenwaste recycling services. Impact Analysis a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. Less Than Significant. Once complete, the project will be served by the CVWD’s existing sewer system. Stormwater will be treated through an underground system to collect all of the stormwater runoff from the project site. Therefore, the Project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements and will have a less than significant impact. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant. The CVWD reviewed the Project and identified that it could serve the Project with the existing water and wastewater treatment facilities (CVWD, October 5, 2017). The CVWD identified that utilities are available in the public rights of way; the only water and wastewater improvements required for the Project are on-site pipelines and unit connections to the infrastructure systems, which are subject to connection fees. Therefore, the proposed Project would not require or result in the construction or expansion of new water or wastewater treatment facilities off-site, and the Project would have no significant impacts. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant. The project will not require levels of water usage that would impact stormwater drainage systems on or around the Project site. As discussed in Section IX Hydrology and Water Quality, impervious runoff created from the project will drain into an underground system. Therefore, use of the proposed onsite underground system will not require in new or expanded storm drain public infrastructure that would cause significant environmental effects. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant. The proposed Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and zoning. The CVWD reviewed the Project and identified that it could serve the Project with the existing water and entitlements (CVWD, October 5, 2017). The CVWD identified that the Project lies within the study area of the 2010 Water Management Plan Update. The CVWD identified that the groundwater basin in the Coachella Valley is in a state of overdraft, and each new development contributes incrementally to the overdraft. CVWD identified that its Water Management Plan is in place to reduce overdraft and identifies specific actions for reducing overdraft. The CVWD identified that the Project must comply with elements and actions described in the plan. The proposed Project would not require new or expanded water entitlements, and the Project would have no related significant impacts. 248 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 77 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant. Refer to (b) above. f) Be served by a landfill(s) with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Less Than Significant. Burrtec Waste provides trash collection for the City of La Quinta, and will haul the waste to a transfer station for proper disposal at one of three regional landfills: Lamb Canyon, Badlands or El Sobrante. All three landfills have capacity remaining for the long-term (City of La Quinta, February 19, 2013). Construction Waste: The site is undeveloped, so no demolition waste is anticipated. Small volumes of construction waste are anticipated during construction including pallets, strapping, packaging, excess wood and metal. Due to the small volume of construction-related waste that may be generated during construction, and the millions of cubic yards of remaining capacity at the three regional landfills that would serve the Project, less than significant impacts would occur under this criterion as a result of future construction activities. Operations Waste: The waste generated by this proposed Project is anticipated to be similar to retail centers with similar uses. Annual waste generation is anticipated as follows: Grocery 63,000 s.f.: 2,920 cubic yards Shops and banks. 30,000 s.f: 624 cubic yards Fast Food and restaurants. 32,000 s.f.: 520 cubic yards The three regional landfills have long-term capacity; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. All solid waste generated by the Project during both construction and operation would be handled in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations. The City is currently required to implement new and maintain ongoing waste and recycling programs and recycle at least 50 percent of its solid waste stream, and is meeting that goal (City of La Quinta, February 19, 2013). Therefore, no impacts would occur under this criterion as a result of future Project activities. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: No mitigation measures were identified with the previously approved Specific Plan for this criterion. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 2 - EA2017-0006 (Pavilion Palms): No mitigation measures are required. Impact Conclusions: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 249 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 78 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact or Does Not Apply XVIII. Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long- term environmental goals? X c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Impact Analysis a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. All impacts to the environment, including impacts to habitat for fish and wildlife species, fish and wildlife populations, plant and animal communities, rare and endangered plants and animals, and historical and pre‐historical resources were evaluated as part of this IS/MND. Potential impacts associated with nesting birds were identified however implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 reduces the potential impacts to than significant. Section IV, Biological Resources, addresses the potential impacts and mitigation measures in detail. As there are no other potentially significant impacts and no further mitigation is required in any other area, the adoption of the mitigation measures associated with biological impacts will ensure that the Project as a whole would have less than significant cumulative impacts on the environment in and around the Project area. 250 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 79 Additionally, as previously discussed, a cultural resources records search for the Project was conducted to identify cultural resources within one mile of the project site (CRM, June 5, 2017). The research did not identify any cultural resources within Project site specifically, but identified that Mitigation Measures CUL-1, CUL-2 and CUL-3 were required during grading activities due to a high cultural resources sensitivity. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Less Than Significant Impact. The project objective is to construct a retail center that is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Zoning. The preceding evaluation of project impacts concluded that it can be implemented without causing any significant adverse impacts on any environmental resource issues. Therefore, meeting short-term goals will not be to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed throughout this IS/MND, implementation of the proposed Project has the potential to result in effects to the environment that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable primarily in the categories of Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas and Traffic. The City’s General Plan analysis this site assumed the site was zoned Community Commercial with a FAR of 0.33, which is greater than the 0.22 proposed. Since the General Plan Environmental Impact Report was a City-wide analysis and found significant impacts, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations in the categories of Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas and Traffic. For this project, in all instances where the analysis identified that the Project has the potential to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact to the environment, mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce potential effects to less than significant levels. As such, with incorporation of the mitigation measures imposed throughout this IS/MND, the Project would not contribute to environmental effects that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, and impacts would be less than significant. d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project’s potential to result in environmental effects that could adversely affect human beings, either directly or indirectly, has been discussed throughout this IS/MND, and are primarily in the categories of: Aesthetics, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Traffic. In instances where the analysis identified that the Project has potential to result in direct or indirect adverse effects to human beings, mitigation measures have been applied to reduce the impact to less than significant levels. With required implementation of mitigation measures identified in this IS/MND, construction and operation of the proposed Project would not involve any activities that would result in environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 251 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 80 Section 5 ‐ Summary of Mitigation Measures I. Aesthetics AES-1 Provide shielding for the dual head pole in the southwest corner as per the lighting design engineering recommendations. III. Air Quality AIR-1: Contractor is to implement at a minimum a 10-day painting schedule. IV. Biological Resources BIO - 1: Any grubbing, brushing or tree removal should be conducted outside of the State identified nesting season for migratory birds, which is typically March 15 through September 1. If work cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a migratory nesting bird survey within and adjacent to the project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three (3) days prior to initiating the construction activities. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) will be prepared and implemented. At a minimum, the NBP will include guidelines for addressing active nests, establishing buffers, monitoring, and reporting. The NBP will include a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and an appropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from direct and indirect impact. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be determined by the biologist, and shall be based on the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, and expected types of disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing, within which no vegetation clearing or ground disturbance shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and a monitoring report has been submitted reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta. V. Cultural Resources CUL-1: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified archeological monitor. In the event unanticipated archaeological resources are discovered: The archaeological monitor shall notify the project foreman The Archaeological monitor has the authority to temporarily halt work in the area of archaeological discoveries until the resource has been evaluated All work in the vicinity of the find shall halt Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until written notification is received from the Project archaeologist 252 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 81 CUL-2: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified paleontological monitor. Paleontological monitors should be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed, to avoid construction delays, and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Monitoring will be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units as described by the San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Sciences May 2, 2017 report are not present, or if present are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. CUL-3: If human remains are encountered during the undertaking, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The local authorities must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. VI. Geology and Soils GEO-1 Prior to grading plan approval, submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, a PMl0 management plan. GEO-2 For portions of the site not immediately under construction, ensure the stabilization of soils through the use of soil cement or re-vegetation, frequent watering. including watering during the evening and weekends during significant wind events; street sweeping or washing during construction, and the chemical stabilization of unpaved construction roadways. VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ – 1 A hazardous spill prevention plan shall be prepared by the Applicant and submitted to the City for approval to minimize the likelihood of a spill shall be prepared prior to construction. The plan shall state the actions that would be required if a spill occurs to prevent contamination of surface waters and provide for cleanup of the spill. The plan shall follow Federal, state, and local safety guidelines and standards to avoid increased exposure to these pollutants. HAZ – 2 If a contaminated area is encountered during construction, construction shall cease in the vicinity of the contaminated area. The construction contractor shall notify all appropriate authorities, including the EPA and the City. If necessary, the contaminated site shall be remediated to minimize the potential for exposure of the public and to allow the Project to be safety constructed. IX. Hydrology and Water Quality HYD-1 Prior to Project approval, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that shall, at minimum, include the following: 253 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 82 Identifies all project related pollutants, impacts to the site’s hydrologic condition, and potential impacts to local waterways caused by Project post-construction runoff; Identifies BMPs required to remove pollutants from the Projects’ post construction runoff and prevent downstream hydromodification; Identifies parties responsible for long term operation and maintenance activities of all BMPs; Identifies the design, operation and maintenance of the underground stormwater collection system. XII. Noise NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier as close to the device; Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drivethroughs; Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises Turn off idling equipment and vehicles All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers 254 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 83 All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications All on-site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m. XVI. Traffic TRAF-1 Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources TRC-1 Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians or Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians should be present during the initial grading/ground disturbing activities. 255 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 84 Section 6 - References Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017. Focused Traffic Study to Determine the Feasibility of a Full-Access Unsignalized Driveway on Avenue 50 West of Jefferson Street in the City of La Quinta. Antonio Acoustics, June 16, 2017, Lundin Development Com Proposed Retail Development, La Quinta, Noise Study. Antonio Acoustics, September 18, 2017. Retail Development at Ave 50 & Jefferson St - Outdoor Retail Audible Devices California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program: California Important Farmland Finder, http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ciff.html, accessed 8/13/17. City of La Quinta, February 19, 2013. La Quinta 2035 General Plan. Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), October 5, 2017. Pavilion Palms Shopping Center, TPM 2017-0003, SDP 2017-0009, EA 2017-0006, MUP2017-0016, Northwest Comer of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, APN's 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602- 180-013, 602-180-014. CRM Tech, June 5, 2017, Letter Report: Re: Update to Historical/Archaeological Resources Studies Parcel 1, TPM 36539-R (Formerly TPM 29052), City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. CRM TECH Project No. 348/355/3210. Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2006. Construction Equipment Noise Levels. Federal Transit Administration. 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Report Number FTA-VA-90-1003-06. Innovative Design Engineers, August 21, 2017. Pavilions La Quinta, Site Lighting, NWC Avenue 50 & Jefferson St, La Quinta, CA Jericho Systems Inc (Jericho), May 23, 2017. General Biological Resources Assessment And Coachella Valley MSHCP Consistency Review For a 12-acre Parcel (APNs: 602-180-003, 602-180-004, 602-180-005, 602-180-013, & 602-180-014) City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California Landmark Geo-Engineers and Geologists, August 25, 2017. Geotechnical Report, Fairway Plaza, NW Corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California, LCI Report No. LP 17117. San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Sciences (SBCM), May 2, 2017. Paleontology Literature / Records Review, Parcel 1, of Parcel Map 36539-R. Southland Geotechnical, November 5, 1998. Geotechnical Investigation, Lucky’s Shopping Center, NW Corner of Ave 50 and Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California. State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control Website. www.dtsc.ca.gov SunLine Transit Agency, October 3, 2017, Letter to Cheri Flores, Project Planner, City of La Quinta, RE: Pavillion Palms Shopping Center. 256 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 INITIAL STUDY Page 85 Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., July 2012. Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan. Warner Engineering, February 19, 2002. Fairway Plaza Shopping Center, Specific Plan Amendment #1, Planning Commission Resolution 2002-006; Originally Approved by the City of La Quinta City Council Resolution 99-63, Adopted May 18, 1999, Original Specific Plan No. 98-034, New Case 98-034 Amended Adopted by City Council on September 19, 2002. 257 [this page left intentionally blank] 258 Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center La Quinta, CA EA2017-0006 Lead Agency: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 259 Introduction This Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project has been prepared to report to the decision-making authority of the City of La Quinta of the comments received on the Mitigated Negative Declaration during the public review process. The public review period for the project took place between March 23, 2018 and April 23, 2018. This Final MND includes a list of persons, organizations and public agencies who commented on the Draft MND, the comment letters and responses, a section of errata explaining revisions to the Draft MND which were made in response to comments, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Comments and Responses The City of La Quinta received a total of 12 comment letters from various agencies and residents living in the project vicinity. The following list provides the name of the commenter, his/her affiliation, and the date the letter was sent. The comment letters and responses follow in order of this list. Letter Number Author/Affiliation Date A Katie Croft, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians April 2, 2018 B Gerald Cantarini, La Quinta Renaissance HOA April 3, 2018 C Anthony Madrigal, Jr., Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians April 2, 2018 D Rosie Lua, City of Indio April 10, 2018 E Lijin Sun, J.D., South Coast Air Quality Management District April 17, 2018 F Pat Kelly, Resident of Palmilla April 18, 2018 G Kent Bailey, Resident of Palmilla April 20, 2018 H Ken Hulbert, Palmilla HOA April 21, 2018 I Leila Namvar, Resident of La Quinta Renaissance April 22, 2018 J Robert and Marilyn Lang, Residents of Palmilla April 23, 2018 K Steve Cenicola, Resident of La Quinta Renaissance April 23, 2018 L Anita Petke, Sunline Transit Agency April 20, 2018 260 03-003-2017-004 Dear Ms. Cheri Flores, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments: [VIA EMAIL TO:clflores@la-quinta.org] City of La Quinta Ms. Cheri Flores 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 April 02, 2018 Re: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760)699-6829. You may also email me at ACBCI-THPO@aguacaliente.net. Cordially, Katie Croft Cultural Resources Manager Tribal Historic Preservation Office AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS *The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. #* Kotevewit village, a Tribal Cultural Resource, is located in the project area. #* There is a mitigation measure for an archaeological monitor, but there should also be a mitigation measure for a Native American Monitor during ground disturbing activities. 261 April 23, 2017 Katie Croft, Cultural Resource Manager Tribal Historic Preservation Office Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Katie: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment A-1: The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. Kotevewit village, a Tribal Cultural Resource, is located in the project area. Response A-1: Comments are noted. Mitigation Measures CUL-1, CUL-3 and TCR-1 are included to minimize impacts to cultural and tribal resources. CUL-1—Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified archeological monitor. In the event unanticipated archaeological resources are discovered: • The Archaeological monitor shall notify the project foreman • The Archaeological monitor has the authority to temporarily halt work in the area of archaeological discoveries until the resource has been evaluated • All work in the vicinity of the find shall halt • Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until written notification is received from the Project archaeologist CUL-3—If human remains are encountered during the undertaking, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The local authorities must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission 262 of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. TCR-1—Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians or Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians should be present during the initial grading/ground disturbing activities. Comment A-2: There is a mitigation measure for an archaeological monitor, but there should also be a mitigation measure for a Native American Monitor during ground disturbing activities. Response A-2: As mentioned in Response A-1 above, the Mitigated Negative Declaration does include in Section XVII, Tribal Cultural Resources, a mitigation measure (TCR-1) which requires a Native American Monitor during ground-moving activities. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 263 264 Highway 111 and Avenue 50 there are seven (7) gas stations. In addition, there is severe concern that the proposed mini mart will offer an after hour's gang hangout. We are all aware of the crime and gang activity in Indio, which has already attempted to infiltrate the Eastern La Quinta residential areas. Should removal of the gas station and mini mart not be an option, we would offer the following proposal: A. Restrict the size and hours of the operation of the mini mart; B. Relocate the gas station to the east of the project site, closer to Jefferson with a landscape berm; C. Require that the gas station be more aesthetically appealing to the environment. 2. Proposed left turn lane on Avenue 50 near Jefferson: While the developer has proposed infrastructure changes, these changes do not offer a solution to the hazards created by this left turn lane: A. The left turn lane location is too close to the Avenue 50/Jefferson traffic light and intersection; B. The proposal does not adequately address the east/west traffic flow. The submitted traffic study was completed in July of 2017 and did not take into consideration the heavy fluctuation and traffic counts during the November through April period. Without question, the left turn lane as proposed, will create a severe traffic hazard. 3. The heavily traveled eastbound Avenue 50 street creates the gateway to the City of La Quinta. The appearance of the northeast comer should require a more appealing and inviting appearance with stone, landscaping, berms, and possibly a statue. There are many other concerns that should be considered by the City Council: tuning of finished build -out of the project, i.e. all proposed building pads, noise control during construction and upon completion, and height of the existing wall. Additionally, the La Quinta Renaissance Board and residents have concern over the developer's ability or willingness to create proper design, color schemes, maintenance and completion timeline. This concern was magnified after the inspection of two similar properties constructed, but not finished by the proposed developer on another construction site. This concern was also communicated by the Indio Planning Commission, who had an unfavorable experience with Loudin Development on both projects. -2- LIM 265 266 April 23, 2017 Gerald Cantarini, President La Quinta Renaissance Homeowners Association 79783 Joey Court La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Cantarini: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment B-1: Proposed left turn lane on Avenue 50 near Jefferson: While the developer has proposed infrastructure changes, these changes do not offer a solution to the hazards created by this left turn lane: A. The left turn lane location is too close to the Avenue 50/Jefferson traffic light and intersection; B. The proposal does not adequately address the east/west traffic flow. The submitted traffic study was completed in July of 2017 and did not take into consideration the heavy fluctuation and traffic counts during the November through April period. Without question, the left tum lane as proposed, will create a severe traffic hazard. Response B-1: The traffic section of the Mitigated Negative Declaration analyzed potential hazards due to design features. The eastern driveway on Avenue 50 will allow right and left turns. Shared left-turn and right-turn markings are specifically outlined in Chapter 3 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and such movements are generally allowed at many corner gas stations throughout Southern California. In addition, Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 will be implemented in order to minimize impacts to the Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street intersection due to projected area growth. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 267 268 April 23, 2017 Anthony Madrigal Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians 46-200 Harrison Place Coachella, CA 92236 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Madrigal: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment C-1: This letter is in regards to consultation in compliance with AB 52 (California Public Resources Code§ 21080.3.1) for the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. As stated in our letter, sent October 24, 2017, the Tribal Historic Preservation Office is aware of numerous cultural resources within 1-mile of the project area and three cultural resources within the project boundary. For these reasons, the report recommended archaeological monitoring during earth-moving activates. There is an increased possibility of encountering cultural resources during the construction processes that may take place because of cultural resources recorded within the project's boundaries, and it is in the vicinity of an area with high archaeological sensitivity. Avoidance, if feasible, would negate adverse effects on the project. The THPO continues to request that approved Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project as indicated in TCR-1. The following conditions (CUL 1 -4, TCR-1) would mitigate current concerns for the aforementioned project, however, if there are any changes, please notify the THPO. Response C-1: Comments are noted and mitigation measures are incorporated in the MND document and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 269 From:Rosie Lua To:Cheri Flores Cc:Les Johnson; Tom Brohard Subject:RE: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center-Jefferson and Ave 50 Date:Tuesday, April 10, 2018 8:11:38 AM Hi Cheri, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2. At this time, we have no further comments on this project. Our previous response letter dated October 18, 2017 which summarized priority items discussed in the Initial Study and Focused Traffic Study remain. Please let us know if you have any further questions. Thank you, Rosie Lua Assistant Planner City of Indio rlua@indio.org 760-391-4016 270 October 18, 2017 Development Services Department City of La Quinta Attention: Cheri Flores Design and Development Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center — Initial Site Plan & Focused Traffic Study Dear Ms. Flores, Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center project proposed at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. The 125,800 square foot project includes a supermarket, a gas station with convenience market, five pads with drive thru facilities, and other commercial buildings. The following are comments provided by the City's Traffic Engineer responding to the Initial Site Plan and a July 27, 2017 Focused Traffic Study: 1) Trip Generation — While pass -by trip reductions are shown, the Traffic Study does not appear to include a table that summarizes peak hour and daily trip generation forecasts for each proposed building as well as internal trip reductions within and D-2 between the uses on the site itself. (Page 8 of the Traffic Study is missing from my copy of the report). 2) Derek Alan Drive Connection — Access is proposed to connect the shopping center to Derek Alan Drive on the north, a local street that serves the gated Renaissance residential development. Left turns out of Derek Alan Drive to northbound Jefferson Street are physically prohibited by a raised median while northbound left turns into Derek Alan Drive are accommodated. The driveway connection between the shopping center and Derek Alan Drive should be eliminated as it will create congestion at the entrance/exit to the gated residential development and it does not facilitate exiting to the north. D-3 271 3) Eastbound Left Turn Lane on Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street — The Traffic Study indicates concerns have been expressed by City of La Quinta staff regarding peak hour queuing in the eastbound left turn lane on Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street. From my observations of this intersection, the longest queues result from parent trips to and from the elementary and middle schools on the north side of Avenue 50 to the west rather than from traditional peak hour commuter trips. Calculations in the Traffic Study indicate that storage for eastbound left turns at Jefferson Street will be adequate in 2019 and will be marginally adequate in Year 2035. Additional left turn storage is proposed to be provided west of the full access driveway for left turns into the proposed full access driveway and for Jefferson Street. This treatment has been used in urbanized areas were left turn storage for stacking may only be marginally adequate. 4) Relocate Avenue 50 Full Access Driveway Further To The West — Before accepting the open-ended eastbound left turn lane shown on the site plan and described immediately above, it is suggested that alternatives be explored in further detail including: a. Flip Building 8 just south of the supermarket with the Pavilions Fuel location southeast of the supermarket. b. Reorient the supermarket so it is parallel to the diagonal at the northwest corner in the site. c. Designate and widen the westerly aisle driveway on Avenue 50 as the major full -access driveway and narrow and limit the easterly driveway on Avenue 50 to right turns only. This would provide a longer throat on the repositioned major full access driveway. Entering the fueling area as currently designed from the main full access driveway could potentially block the entering traffic lane as motorists seek the first opportunity to line up for fuel. To access the fueling positions closest to Avenue 50 requires a sharp right turn greater than 90 degrees. D-4 D-5 5) Avenue 50 East of Jefferson Street — There are no significant issues associated with the Citrus Plaza Ralphs full access driveway on the north side of Avenue 50 D-6 about 300' east of Jefferson Street. 272 6) Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street Operational Improvements - To improve the traffic signal operation at Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, a westbound right turn green arrow overlap should be considered. With this additional feature and a shorter traffic signal cycle, the intersection operation would improve and delays would be reduced. The City of La Quinta should also consider "conditional service" (a practice used by the City of Indio) so that eastbound left turns could be served a second time in the same signal cycle if a gap in opposing westbound through traffic occurs. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Please contact me at (760) 391-4016 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Rosie Lua Assistant Planner D-7 273 April 23, 2017 Rosie Lua, Assistant Planner City of Indio 100 Civic Center Mall Indio, CA 92201 rlua@indio.org SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Ms. Lua: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked with and responses are as follows: Comment D-1: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2. At this time, we have no further comments on this project. Our previous response letter dated October 18, 2017 which summarized priority items discussed in the Initial Study and Focused Traffic Study remain. Response D-1: We have included the October 18, 2017 letter and comments from that letter are addressed subsequently. Comment D-2: Trip Generation - While pass-by trip reductions are shown, the Traffic Study does not appear to include a table that summarizes peak hour and daily trip generation forecasts for each proposed building as well as internal trip reductions within and between the uses on the site itself. (Page 8 of the Traffic Study is missing from my copy of the report). Response D-2: Page 8 of the Traffic Study is attached which shows the trip generation. The MND included this information and analyzed the project accordingly. Comment D-3: Derek Alan Drive Connection - Access is proposed to connect the shopping center to Derek Alan Drive on the north, a local street that serves the gated Renaissance residential development. Left turns out of Derek Alan Drive to northbound Jefferson Street are physically prohibited by a raised median while northbound left turns into Derek Alan Drive are accommodated. The driveway connection between the shopping center and Derek Alan Drive should be eliminated as it will create congestion at the entrance/exit to the gated residential development and it does not facilitate exiting to the north. Response D-3: The Derek Alan Drive connection has been eliminated. 274 Comment D-4: Eastbound Left Turn Lane on Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street - The Traffic Study indicates concerns have been expressed by City of La Quinta staff regarding peak hour queuing in the eastbound left turn lane on Avenue 50 at Jefferson Street. From my observations of this intersection, the longest queues result from parent trips to and from the elementary and middle schools on the north side of Avenue 50 to the west rather than from traditional peak hour commuter trips. Calculations in the Traffic Study indicate that storage for eastbound left turns at Jefferson Street will be adequate in 2019 and will be marginally adequate in Year 2035. Additional left turn storage is proposed to be provided west of the full access driveway for left turns into the proposed full access driveway and for Jefferson Street. This treatment has been used in urbanized areas were left turn storage for stacking may only be marginally adequate. Response D-4: The MND includes a mitigation measure to account for this situation. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Comment D-5: Relocate Avenue 50 Full Access Driveway Further To The West - Before accepting the open-ended eastbound left turn lane shown on the site plan and described immediately above, it is suggested that alternatives be explored in further detail including: a. Flip Building 8 just south of the supermarket with the Pavilions Fuel location southeast of the supermarket. b. Reorient the supermarket so it is parallel to the diagonal at the northwest corner in the site. c. Designate and widen the westerly aisle driveway on Avenue 50 as the major full- access driveway and narrow and limit the easterly driveway on Avenue 50 to right turns only. This would provide a longer throat on the repositioned major full access driveway. Entering the fueling area as currently designed from the main full access driveway could potentially block the entering traffic lane as motorists seek the first opportunity to line up for fuel. To access the fueling positions closest to Avenue 50 requires a sharp right turn greater than 90 degrees. Response D-5: Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 in the MND would address the concerns with the easterly full access driveway on Avenue 50. Additionally, the suggested alternative configurations would not be feasible since the neighboring communities do not want the fuel center closer to them. Also, reorienting the supermarket would result in inefficient utilization of the property with conflicting diagonal and right angles throughout the parking field and access points. To address the position of the fueling area, the fuel center has been reduced and positioned farther from the Avenue 50 entrance thus eliminating sharp turns. Comment D-6: Avenue 50 East of Jefferson Street - There are no significant issues associated with the Citrus Plaza Ralphs full access driveway on the north side of Avenue 50 about 300' east of Jefferson Street. 275 Response D-6: Thank you for your comment. Comment D-7: Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street Operational Improvements - To improve the traffic signal operation at Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, a westbound right turn green arrow overlap should be considered. With this additional feature and a shorter traffic signal cycle, the intersection operation would improve and delays would be reduced. The City of La Quinta should also consider "conditional service" (a practice used by the City of Indio) so that eastbound left turns could be served a second time in the same signal cycle if a gap in opposing westbound through traffic occurs. Response D-7: Thank you for your comment. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 276 277 SENT VIA E-MAIL AND USPS: April 17, 2018 cflores@la-quinta.org Cheri Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 8-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. The following comment is meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final MND. Project Description The Lead Agency proposes to develop a total of 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project will include various commercial uses, including banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store. Based on a review of aerial photographs and Figure 2, Site Location1, in the MND, SCAQMD staff found that residential uses are located immediately to the south and southwest of the Proposed Project. Compliance with SCAQMD Rules Since the Proposed Project includes gasoline service station, a permit from SCAQMD would be required, and SCAQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for this Project in the Final MND. The assumptions in the air quality analysis in the Final MND will be the basis for permit conditions and limits. The Final MND should also demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules, including, but are not limited to, Rule 201 – Permit to Construct, Rule 203 – Permit to Operate, and Rule 461 – Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. If there are permitting questions concerning the gasoline service station, they can be directed to SCAQMD Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-2551. Air Quality Analysis In the Air Quality analysis, the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project’s regional construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than significant. However, it does not appear that the Air Quality analysis include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process. This may have likely led to an under-estimation of the Proposed Project’s operational air quality impacts. It is important to note that while CalEEMod2 quantifies mobile source emissions (e.g., trip visits by patrons) associated with operating a gasoline service station, CalEEMod does not quantify the operational stationary source emissions from the storage tanks and fueling equipment. Therefore, it is recommended that the Lead Agency quantify operational emissions from the fueling process in the Final MND. Health Risk Assessment The Proposed Project would be sited in close proximity to existing residential uses. Benzene, which is a toxic air contaminant, may be emitted from the Proposed Project’s gasoline refueling operations. 1 MND. Page 6. 2 CalEEmod incorporates up-to-date state and locally approved emission factors and methodologies for estimating pollutant emissions from typical land use development. CalEEMod is the only software model maintained by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and is available free of charge at: www.caleemod.com. 278 SCAQMD staff is concerned about the potential health impacts on the residents from being exposed to benzene. As such, it is recommended that the Lead Agency evaluate, quantify, and perform a health risk assessment for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Guidance for performing a gasoline dispensing station health risk assessment can be found in the SCAQMD’s Emission Inventory and Risk Assessment Guidelines for Gasoline Dispensing Stations3. Guidance Regarding Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sited Near Sensitive Receptors SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and SCAQMD to reduce community exposure to source-specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, SCAQMD adopted the Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning4 in 2005. Additionally, it is recommended that a 50-foot separation between a gasoline dispensing facility and sensitive land uses (e.g., residential uses)5. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance when making local planning and land use decisions. Mitigation Measures Six mitigation measures from the Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 – Resolution 2002-2006 are incorporated in the MND for the Proposed Project6. Since CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures go beyond what is required by law to minimize any significant impacts, and to further reduce criteria pollutant emissions, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following mitigation measures that are more stringent than those from the Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 – Resolution 2002-2006. Regarding the Second Bullet of Mitigation Measure – “Low Emission Construction Equipment” To further reduce particulate matter emissions during construction and minimize their impacts on nearby residents, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use off‐road diesel‐powered construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARB and USEPA Tier 4 off‐road emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 horsepower or greater during Project construction. Such equipment will be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a CARB certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least 85 percent reduction in in particulate matter emissions7. A list of CARB verified DPFs are available on the CARB website8. These requirements shall be included in applicable bid documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such equipment. A copy of each unit’s certified tier specification or model year specification and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit (if applicable) shall be available upon request at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. In the event that construction equipment cannot meet the Tier 4 engine certification, the Project representative or contractor must demonstrate through future study with written findings supported by substantial evidence that is approved by the Lead Agency before using other technologies/strategies. Alternative applicable strategies may include, but would not be limited to, reduction in the number and/or horsepower rating of construction equipment, limiting the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project, using cleaner vehicle fuel, and/or limiting the number of individual construction project phases occurring simultaneously. 3 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/permits/risk-assessment. 4 South Coast Air Quality Management District. May 2005. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/documents-support-material/planning- guidance/guidance-document. 5 California Air Resources Board. 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Page 4. Accessed at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. 6 MND. Page 25. 7 California Air Resources Board. November 16-17, 2004. Diesel Off-Road Equipment Measure – Workshop. Page 17. Accessed at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/ordiesel/presentations/nov16-04_workshop.pdf. 8 Ibid. Page 18. 279 Regarding the Third Bullet of Mitigation Measure – “Low VOC Paints, Primers, and Coatings” To further reduce VOC emissions from architectural coating, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency require the use of architectural coatings (no more than 50 grams/liter of VOC) that are beyond the limits in SCAQMD Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings9. Regarding the Sixth Bullet of Mitigation Measure – “Deliveries during Off-Peak Periods” SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency require that no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. This is consistent with the California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines10. Closing Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review process. Please provide the SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final MND. When responding to issues raised in the comments, response should provide sufficient details giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. There should be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information do not facilitate the purpose and goal of CEQA on public disclosure and are not meaningful or useful to decision makers and to the public who are interested in the Proposed Project. SCAQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address any air quality questions that may arise from this comment letter. Please contact me at lsun@aqmd.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lijin Sun Lijin Sun, J.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources LS RVC180327-04 Control Number 9 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 1113: Architectural Coatings. Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf. 10 California Air Resources Board. June 2009. Written Idling Policy Guidelines. Accessed at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/ordiesel/guidance/writtenidlingguide.pdf. 280 April 23, 2017 Lijin Sun, J.D., Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR SCAQMD Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Ms. Sun: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment E-1: Project Description—The Lead Agency proposes to develop a total of 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project will include various commercial uses, including banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store. Based on a review of aerial photographs and Figure 2, Site Location, in the MND, SCAQMD staff found that residential uses are located immediately to the south and southwest of the Proposed Project. Response E-1: Pages 1 and 8 of the MND identify that while the total project is 125,800 square feet, 100,460 square feet was already approved in 2002. The uses approved in 2002 are the same as the uses currently proposed. Therefore, the MND uses the analysis from the previously certified MND (2002) for the approved 100,460 square feet and is only required to focus on the impacts of adding of 25,340 square feet to the retail areas. Comment E-2: Compliance with SCAQMD Rules—Since the Proposed Project includes gasoline service station, a permit from SCAQMD would be required, and SCAQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for this Project in the Final MND. The assumptions in the air quality analysis in the Final MND will be the basis for permit conditions and limits. The Final MND should also demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules, including, but are not limited to, Rule 201 – Permit to Construct, Rule 203 – Permit to Operate, and Rule 461 – Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. If there are permitting questions concerning the gasoline service station, they can be directed to SCAQMD Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-2551. Response E-2: The applicant has been made aware of the requirement to obtain a permit from the SCQAMD for the gasoline service station. Comment E-3: Air Quality Analysis—In the Air Quality analysis, the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project’s regional construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than 281 significant. However, it does not appear that the Air Quality analysis include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process. This may have likely led to an under-estimation of the Proposed Project’s operational air quality impacts. It is important to note that while CalEEMod quantifies mobile source emissions (e.g., trip visits by patrons) associated with operating a gasoline service station, CalEEMod does not quantify the operational stationary source emissions from the storage tanks and fueling equipment. Therefore, it is recommended that the Lead Agency quantify operational emissions from the fueling process in the Final MND. Response E-3: The Proposed Project which was analyzed is the added 25,340 square feet to the retail areas. The previous approval included an air quality analysis for the gasoline service station, therefore, no further analysis was conducted for the gasoline station. However, a Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) analysis was prepared for the additional 25,340 square feet, and the results (which were less than significant) were identified in the MND. Comment E-4: Health Risk Assessment—The Proposed Project would be sited in close proximity to existing residential uses. Benzene, which is a toxic air contaminant, may be emitted from the Proposed Project’s gasoline refueling operations. SCAQMD staff is concerned about the potential health impacts on the residents from being exposed to benzene. As such, it is recommended that the Lead Agency evaluate, quantify, and perform a health risk assessment for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Guidance for performing a gasoline dispensing station health risk assessment can be found in the SCAQMD’s Emission Inventory and Risk Assessment Guidelines for Gasoline Dispensing Stations. Response E-4: The Lead Agency determined that a Health Risk Assessment wasn’t necessary since it is not a requirement. The comment will be shared with the Planning Commission for consideration. Comment E-5: Guidance Regarding Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sited Near Sensitive Receptors—SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and SCAQMD to reduce community exposure to source-specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, SCAQMD adopted the Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning in 2005. Additionally, it is recommended that a 50-foot separation between a gasoline dispensing facility and sensitive land uses (e.g., residential uses). SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance when making local planning and land use decisions. Response E-5: Thank you for your comment. The location of the proposed gasoline dispensing facility is over 50 feet away from sensitive uses in the area. The guidance will be considering in planning and land use decisions. Comment E-6: Mitigation Measures—Six mitigation measures from the Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 – Resolution 2002-2006 are incorporated in the MND for the Proposed Project. 282 Since CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures go beyond what is required by law to minimize any significant impacts, and to further reduce criteria pollutant emissions, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following mitigation measures that are more stringent than those from the Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 – Resolution 2002-2006. Regarding the Second Bullet of Mitigation Measure – “Low Emission Construction Equipment” To further reduce particulate matter emissions during construction and minimize their impacts on nearby residents, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use off‐road diesel‐ powered construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARB and USEPA Tier 4 off‐road emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 horsepower or greater during Project construction. Such equipment will be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a CARB certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least 85 percent reduction in in particulate matter emissions. A list of CARB verified DPFs are available on the CARB website. These requirements shall be included in applicable bid documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such equipment. A copy of each unit’s certified tier specification or model year specification and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit (if applicable) shall be available upon request at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. In the event that construction equipment cannot meet the Tier 4 engine certification, the Project representative or contractor must demonstrate through future study with written findings supported by substantial evidence that is approved by the Lead Agency before using other technologies/strategies. Alternative applicable strategies may include, but would not be limited to, reduction in the number and/or horsepower rating of construction equipment, limiting the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project, using cleaner vehicle fuel, and/or limiting the number of individual construction project phases occurring simultaneously. Regarding the Third Bullet of Mitigation Measure – “Low VOC Paints, Primers, and Coatings” To further reduce VOC emissions from architectural coating, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency require the use of architectural coatings (no more than 50 grams/liter of VOC) that are beyond the limits in SCAQMD Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings. Regarding the Sixth Bullet of Mitigation Measure – “Deliveries during Off-Peak Periods” SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency require that no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. This is consistent with the California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines. Response E-6: Page 22 of the MND states: 6. The operator shall comply with all existing and future California Air Resources Board (CARB) and SCAQMD regulations related to diesel-fueled trucks, which may include among others: (1) meeting more stringent emission standards; (2) retrofitting existing engines with particulate traps; (3) use of low sulfur fuel; and (4) use of alternative fuels or equipment. 283 Additionally, Mitigation Measures will be added to the Final EIR which address SCAQMD’s concerns. AIR-2: To the extent feasible, project applicant shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AIR-3: In accordance with California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines, no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. Comment E-7: Closing—Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review process. Please provide the SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final MND. When responding to issues raised in the comments, response should provide sufficient details giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. There should be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information do not facilitate the purpose and goal of CEQA on public disclosure and are not meaningful or useful to decision makers and to the public who are interested in the Proposed Project. Response E-7: Responses to your comments have been provided as requested. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 284 From:Kelly, Pat To:Cheri Flores Subject:Pavilions Palms Shopping Center Date:Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:27:01 PM My name is Pat Kelly and I reside at 50375 Via Puesta Del Sol, La Quinta. This is the Palmilla Development located at Avenue 50 & Jefferson. I have some concerns about the proposed Pavilions Palms Shopping Center 1) It appears that there is a fuel island designed on the southwest portion of the property. I believe this is unsafe and should be moved to the north and up against Jefferson Street. Light pollution from a fuel island, especially if opened 24 hours, will have a negative impact on my residence. 2) How are U-turns from this development going to be prevented at the entrance to Palmilla on Avenue 50.? The City of La Quinta police does an awful job of patrolling Avenue 50 as it is, so how would this safety issue be mitigated? 3) How will the developer mitigate noise that will impact properties near the development? This appears to be a high density development and will have lots of traffic & noise so how will this be addressed? I am concerned that this will have a negative impact on my residence. 4) Avenue 50 is already in terrible shape and this development will likely make it even worse. What is the City of La Quinta’s plan to fix the pavement that is already in awful shape, and is basically never even maintained? Thank you, Pat Kelly 285 April 23, 2017 Pat Kelly 50375 Via Puesta Del Sol La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Pat: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment F-1: It appears that there is a fuel island designed on the southwest portion of the property. I believe this is unsafe and should be moved to the north and up against Jefferson Street. Light pollution from a fuel island, especially if opened 24 hours, will have a negative impact on my residence. How are U-turns from this development going to be prevented at the entrance to Palmilla on Avenue 50.? The City of La Quinta police does an awful job of patrolling Avenue 50 as it is, so how would this safety issue be mitigated? How will the developer mitigate noise that will impact properties near the development? This appears to be a high density development and will have lots of traffic & noise so how will this be addressed? I am concerned that this will have a negative impact on my residence. Response F-1: The fuel center will be in operation from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. A lighting plan has been designed to result in no light spillage onto surrounding properties. The project includes a full movement access point at the easterly driveway on Avenue 50. Vehicles exiting the shopping center on Avenue 50 would be able to turn left out of this driveway in order to go in the eastbound direction. There would be minimal U-turns at the Palmilla entrance on Avenue 50. A noise study was prepared for the project that evaluated the project’s noise impact on the area and was included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The existing ambient noise in the area which is generated from traffic along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is approximately 65 decibels. The noise study shows that the project would not generate noise levels in excess of this. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration included mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. 286 Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers 287 •All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units •Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment •Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum •Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use •Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications •All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 288 From:Kent Bailey To:Cheri Flores Cc:Dana S Bailey Subject:Proposed Pavilions Palms Center Comment Date:Friday, April 20, 2018 4:42:30 PM Hi Cheri, Thanks for the note, I’ll try again! After reviewing the summary of the plan for the proposed shopping, food and fuel center, my wife and I are most concerned. We can understand a need for a modest sized upscale grocery, but find a new center unnecessary when a desireable space is already available nearby. We’re disappointed that the developer, the current owner and city haven’t worked together to rehab the old Ralph’s location and dilapidated mall on Washington and Calle Tampico. As you no doubt know, there is an existing good sized grocery pad and space for numerous retail spaces that are way under utilized. With modest change a 24 pump fuel center could be placed on the lot as well. The 50th and Jefferson location is objectionable to us and many of our neighbors in Palmilla, with our entrance almost across the street from the proposed center. The center would negatively impact our quality of life us in the following ways: Much more traffic and congestion on 50th and at the Jefferson intersection. The Palmilla egress would be especially impacted and difficult. Late night fast food drive thrus and gas pump intercoms... noise pollution some of which would pollute for 24 hrs daily. High intensity lighting creates light pollution, the Ralph’s Center across the street has plenty of that already. A larger than needed fuel center would serve hundreds of vehicles daily and further impact traffic on our busy intersection. If it were placed further North on Jefferson that would be Mitgate some of the congestion and be a possible alternative site. Restaurant emissions of smoke and smell such as exists along Hwy 111 between Stater Bros and Wells Fargo is unacceptable in any residential setting such as ours. The commotion and traffic created by the addition of this center would no doubt drive our property values down and in fact lead to lower property tax revenue. We urge the city to say NO to this proposal in favor of a better center on the space across from City Hall on Calle Tampico. J Kent Bailey Dana S Bailey 50415 Via Serenidad LaQuinta Ca 92253 206 890 5386 Cell 289 April 23, 2017 Kent Bailey 50415 Via Serenidad La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Bailey: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment G-1: The 50th and Jefferson location is objectionable to us and many of our neighbors in Palmilla, with our entrance almost across the street from the proposed center. The center would negatively impact our quality of life us in the following ways: Much more traffic and congestion on 50th and at the Jefferson intersection. The Palmilla egress would be especially impacted and difficult. Late night fast food drive thrus and gas pump intercoms... noise pollution some of which would pollute for 24 hrs daily. High intensity lighting creates light pollution, the Ralph’s Center across the street has plenty of that already. Response G-1: The Mitigated Negative Declaration addresses the impacts of traffic on the Avenue 50 and Jefferson intersection. The project includes a full movement access point at the easterly driveway on Avenue 50. Vehicles exiting the shopping center on Avenue 50 would be able to turn left out of this driveway in order to go in the eastbound direction. There would be minimal U-turns at the Palmilla entrance on Avenue 50. Additionally, implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. A noise study was prepared for the project that evaluated the project’s noise impact on the area and was included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The existing ambient noise in the area which is generated from traffic along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is 290 approximately 65 decibels. The noise study shows that the project would not generate noise levels in excess of this. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration included mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. •Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; •Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; •Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; •The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; •There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: •Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools •Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises •Turn off idling equipment and vehicles 291 • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The fuel center will be in operation from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. A lighting plan has been designed to result in no light spillage onto surrounding properties. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 292 As President of Palmilla HOA, a 159-single home development with a main entrance guard gate off of 50th just 500 feet west of Jefferson, our main concerns center around the traffic issues involved with this development. 1.The primary issue concerns location and the stacking capacity of the gas pumps. The gas station has the same number of dispensers as Costco, which implies sales of over 15,000 gallons per day. That translates into roughly 1,000 vehicles per day. However, the stacking design is not as long as the one at Costco that creates a potential bottleneck and interferes with the ingress and egress, thus backing up onto 50th Question: Can you explain your methodology and assumptions for the stacking lanes, especially during peak traffic times? We contend that the movement of the gas station 200 ft north on Jefferson can easily mitigate this issue. 2.Also at issue are concerns regarding the ingress/egress to our community from our main traffic gate on 50th. The current gas station location will force drivers to exit onto west bound traffic onto 50th. We believe that 50% of the new west bound traffic will U-turn at the entry into Palmilla to travel back east or back to Jefferson. (Via Palmilla is our street name.) Question: What were your estimates of U-turn activity and how were they based? We disagree with the EIR assessment and feel that a “no U turn sign” on 50th at our main entrance would discourage this, encourage people to exit onto Jefferson and prevent problems with our access. 3.The EIR indicated that noise issues would be mitigated yet it didn’t address whether the fuel dispensers will have the small TV’s (audible devises) on top showing minute commercials. This noise travels differently than normal ambient noise. Our homeowners nearest to the gas pumps will be adversely impacted if this is the case. Question: Can we be assured that the gas pumps discussed will not have these screens? If they do, what measures will be taken to mitigate this issue? We feel strongly that this type of audible advertising is intrusive in residential adjacent areas and should not be allowed. 4.When our community was being built, Avenue 50 was a two-lane road. Yes, we knew it was going to be widened but the result is that homes adjacent to the street have lost value due to the noise level. 293 Question: Is the city considering building a sound wall to or raising our community wall to mitigate the growing commercial and traffic noise issues. As the city grows and fills out, we feel that the pressure will increase from local residents to mitigate some of the impact. 5. The developer is anticipating up to 5 fast food restaurants and area residents are concerned about blowing trash. Question: What are the developer’s plans to mitigate this issue or will it reside with each fast food establishment? We would like some assurances that a plan is in place and responsibility assigned. 6. As we all know, there are many empty storefronts and restaurants in La Quinta. In addition to the 5 fast food restaurants, the plans call for two free standing bank branches (5,000 and 6,000 sq. feet) with drive-through windows. A report on NBC showed that big banks are still shuttering their locations. Citigroup closed 7 percent of North American branches year over year. And they are looking to take up less space. Technology is dramatically changing how they do business with the ability to do more transactions by computer and phone. We are concerned that this plan is overly ambitious and may wind up with empty commercial storefronts, obsolete bank buildings, and shuttered or less than desirable fast food alternatives. Question: How does the developer plan to roll out the build-out? In addition to the Pavilions market, gas station and convenience market, what other buildings will be built first? Will any other structures be built without a firm commitment from a store, restaurant or bank? What will the empty “pads” look like as we wait for the future commitments? We welcome the addition of the new. high quality grocery store. It will be an added benefit to those of us who live in the neighborhood. We just don’t want to live next to an empty shopping center or one that appears “failed” like others in the La Quinta community because they are overbuilt or not in demand (Sam’s Club, Ralph’s across from city hall, Jules, etc.) We are all proud to call La Quinta home and want it to reflect the appearance and values of our upscale community. 294 April 23, 2017 Ken Hulbert, President Palmilla Homeowners Association ken.hulbert@daumcommercial.com SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Hulbert: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment H-1: The primary issue concerns location and the stacking capacity of the gas pumps. The gas station has the same number of dispensers as Costco, which implies sales of over 15,000 gallons per day. That translates into roughly 1,000 vehicles per day. However, the stacking design is not as long as the one at Costco that creates a potential bottleneck and interferes with the ingress and egress, thus backing up onto 50th Question: Can you explain your methodology and assumptions for the stacking lanes, especially during peak traffic times? We contend that the movement of the gas station 200 ft north on Jefferson can easily mitigate this issue. Response H-1: The proposed fuel center is not expected serve the needs beyond the immediate community and therefore will operate at significantly less volumes than the fuel center at Costco. As planned, there will be 12 pumping stations with the capacity for 12 additional cars in waiting, for a total of 24 car parked at any one time. Based on the proposed operator’s experience, the number of pumps and queue capacity are adequate to safely and conveniently handle expected volumes even at peak hours. Comment H-2: Also at issue are concerns regarding the ingress/egress to our community from our main traffic gate on 50th. The current gas station location will force drivers to exit onto west bound traffic onto 50th. We believe that 50% of the new west bound traffic will U-turn at the entry into Palmilla to travel back east or back to Jefferson. (Via Palmilla is our street name.) Question: What were your estimates of U-turn activity and how were they based? We disagree with the EIR assessment and feel that a “no U turn sign” on 50th at our main entrance would discourage this, encourage people to exit onto Jefferson and prevent problems with our access. 295 Response H-2: The project includes a full movement access point at the easterly driveway on Avenue 50. Vehicles exiting the shopping center on Avenue 50 would be able to turn left out of this driveway in order to go in the eastbound direction. There would be minimal U-turns at the Palmilla entrance on Avenue 50. Comment H-3: The EIR indicated that noise issues would be mitigated yet it didn’t address whether the fuel dispensers will have the small TV’s (audible devises) on top showing minute commercials. This noise travels differently than normal ambient noise. Our homeowners nearest to the gas pumps will be adversely impacted if this is the case. Question: Can we be assured that the gas pumps discussed will not have these screens? If they do, what measures will be taken to mitigate this issue? We feel strongly that this type of audible advertising is intrusive in residential adjacent areas and should not be allowed. Response H-3: Audible advertising devises are to be restricted from the pump island. Comment H-4: When our community was being built, Avenue 50 was a two-lane road. Yes, we knew it was going to be widened but the result is that homes adjacent to the street have lost value due to the noise level. Question: Is the city considering building a sound wall to or raising our community wall to mitigate the growing commercial and traffic noise issues. As the city grows and fills out, we feel that the pressure will increase from local residents to mitigate some of the impact. Response H-4: Avenue 50 has been designated as a 4-lane divided roadway in the City’s General Plan and is currently mostly built to this designation. The project would build out the rest of the roadway per the General Plan designation. A noise study was prepared for the project that evaluated the project’s noise impact on the area and was included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The existing ambient noise in the area which is generated from traffic along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is approximately 65 decibels. The noise study shows that the project would not generate noise levels in excess of this. The noise study does not show the need for additional sound walls or raising the Palmilla community wall. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration included mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. 296 NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum 297 •Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use •Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications •All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Comment H-5: The developer is anticipating up to 5 fast food restaurants and area residents are concerned about blowing trash. Question: What are the developer’s plans to mitigate this issue or will it reside with each fast food establishment? We would like some assurances that a plan is in place and responsibility assigned. Response H-5: The project proposes up to 3 drive throughs which would not necessarily all be fast food restaurants. With this submittal, the applicant has not proposed any fast food drive through restaurants. The applicant has indicated that housekeeping to maintain first class standards will be incorporated within the CC & R’s. Comment H-6: As we all know, there are many empty storefronts and restaurants in La Quinta. In addition to the 5 fast food restaurants, the plans call for two free standing bank branches (5,000 and 6,000 sq. feet) with drive-through windows. A report on NBC showed that big banks are still shuttering their locations. Citigroup closed 7 percent of North American branches year over year. And they are looking to take up less space. Technology is dramatically changing how they do business with the ability to do more transactions by computer and phone. We are concerned that this plan is overly ambitious and may wind up with empty commercial storefronts, obsolete bank buildings, and shuttered or less than desirable fast food alternatives. Question: How does the developer plan to roll out the build-out? In addition to the Pavilions market, gas station and convenience market, what other buildings will be built first? Will any other structures be built without a firm commitment from a store, restaurant or bank? What will the empty “pads” look like as we wait for the future commitments? Response H-6: In addition to the market, fuel center and convenience market, the initial build-out will include Shops 1 along the north end of the development. In addition, all the infrastructure for the development including all perimeter street improvements, sidewalks and landscaping will be completed with the initial development. Any building area not included with the initial build-out will be treated with a dust control agent and dressed out with decorative ground cover. 298 Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 299 LETTER I April 22, 2017 Cheryl L. Flores Senior Planner City of La Quinta Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta CA, 92253 RE: INITIAL STUDY (IS) FOR THE COMMERCIAL PROJECT TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50. Dear Ms. Flores: Please see the following comments regarding the IS for the above noted project. A) General Comment: The prepared Initial Study is a biased document, since it was commissioned by the applicant and it is only considering the additional (approximate) 20,000 q.ft. that has been added to the project, since the approval of the original Specific Plan (SP) in 1999. Please note that the entire project and its cumulative impacts of building a full shopping center shall be consider, since the original SP was prepared in 1999, where there was no development within two (2) square mile of the project (please see the County of Riverside GIS maps from 1996 & 2011 or see attached). B) Traffic Comments: Based on the Initial Study the traffic study was done in June 2017, and the traffic study refers to the preparation date as March of 2017 (page 14 of traffic study). Collecting the traffic data in June is not accurate, sine it is outside of the season and collecting the traffic data in March is not either, since it is at the tail end of the season. The traffic study is based on the first site plan that delineates an exit on Derek Allen; however, the final site plan does not show this exit. Therefore, the traffic study needs to be updated to show where the cars that "originally" were supposed to exit Derek Allen would go, what is their impact on the other driveway approaches (to and from the site), and on the overall site's circulation. The drive thru for building number two (2) shall be redesign. The proposed design will not work. The turning radius is too sharp and the space is very limited; therefore, the cares need do a three-point turn and back up i.nto the main drive aisle in order to get to the drive thru. This will create a safety problem. Page 1 of 6 1-1 1-2 300 C) Lighting Comments: The site proposes 14, 40-foot light poles. 40' is the height of a three and half story 1-3 building. The proposed height is not acceptable for commercial centers that are abutting residential neighborhoods. D) Noise Comments: The noise study states that: "It is assuming that the development will not operate through the night" (page 3 of noise study). This assumption is wrong, since based on the Specific Plan the convenience store will operate from 5:00 am to 12:00 (until midnight). Therefore, the proposed mitigation measures will not mitigate the noise pollution, since the mitigation measures only may reduce the noise during day and not addressing the noise during night. The noise data was collected from 4:50 pm to 5:50 pm on May 30, 2017 (page 5 of Noise Study). The data (table 2, page 9 of Noise Study) indicates that the noise level exceeds 50 db. (please note 50 db. is the acceptable noise level for sensitive land uses such as residential uses). Even with applying the mitigated measures, the noise level will exceed acceptable noise level (50 db.) for sensitive uses such as residential uses. All above noted issues will impact on the health and the quality of life of the people living adjacent to the proposed Center. Therefore, I respectfully request the City to response to my comments and perhaps update the above noted studies to reflect the actual situation. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Leila arnvar 49590 Ali Ct La Quinta CA, 92253 leilanamvar@yahoo.com Cc: Linda Evans, Mayor of La Quinta Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Mayor Pro Tem John Pena, Council Member Robber Radi, Council Member Steve Sanchez, Council Member Page 2 of 6 Irll 301 Paul Quill, Planning Commission Chair Kevin McCune, Planning Commission Vice Chair Michael Proctor, Planning Commissioner Loretta Currie, Planning Commissioner Michael Proctor, Planning Commissioner Mary Caldwell, Planning Commissioner Robert "Bob" Wright, Planning Commissioner Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Gabriel Perez, Planning Manager Page 3 of 6 302 303 304 305 April 23, 2017 Leila Namvar 49590 Ali Ct La Quinta, CA 92253 leilanamvar@yahoo.com SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Leila: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment I-1: The prepared Initial Study is a biased document, since it was commissioned by the applicant and it is only considering the additional (approximate) 20,000 q.ft. that has been added to the project, since the approval of the original Specific Plan (SP) in 1999. Please note that the entire project and its cumulative impacts of building a full shopping center shall be consider, since the original SP was prepared in 1999, where there was no development within two (2) square mile of the project (please see the County of Riverside GIS maps from 1996 & 2011 or see attached). Response I-1: The Lead Agency determined that it was appropriate to consider the additional square footage added to the project as allowed by CEQA Section 15162 regarding subsequent environmental analysis. Since the project has already been approved previously and no substantial changes to the project were proposed, the analysis of the additional square footage was appropriate. Cumulative impacts were based on the analysis of the City’s 2035 General Plan since the project site is zoned and general planned for commercial use; therefore, the project would have been considered in the General Plan EIR. Comment I-2: Based on the Initial Study the traffic study was done in June 2017, and the traffic study refers to the preparation date as March of 2017 (page 14 of traffic study). Collecting the traffic data in June is not accurate, sine it is outside of the season and collecting the traffic data in March is not either, since it is at the tail end of the season. The traffic study is based on the first site plan that delineates an exit on Derek Allen; however, the final site plan does not show this exit. Therefore, the traffic study needs to be updated to show where the cars that "originally" were supposed to exit Derek Allen would go, what is their impact on the other driveway approaches (to and from the site), and on the overall site's circulation. 306 The drive thru for building number two (2) shall be redesign. The proposed design will not work. The turning radius is too sharp and the space is very limited; therefore, the cares need do a three-point turn and back up into the main drive aisle in order to get to the drive thru. This will create a safety problem. Response I-2: The Mitigated Negative Declaration discussed the impacts of the closure of the Derek Alan Drive driveway. The closure has little to no impact on-site circulation or on- street circulation/access. A limited number of residents living in the surrounding residential neighborhood would be impacted by the closure since they would have to drive on arterial streets (Jefferson St. and Avenue 50) to access the project rather than being able to access the project directly from Derek Alan Drive. Regarding on-street circulation, it is unlikely that northbound Jefferson Street motorists destined to the Shopping Center would drive past the left-turn access driveway on Jefferson Street to turn on to Derek Alan Drive only to have to make another left-turn into the site. Likewise, it is unlikely that southbound Jefferson Street traffic would turn right in large numbers on to Derek Alan Drive in order to make a sharp left-turn to enter the far corner of the Shopping Center when they can just continue straight on Jefferson and make a right-turn at one of the other project driveways closest to their destination within the Center. The applicant will be conditioned to redesign the entry to the drive thru at Building 2. The plan does meet the minimum driveway width required of 12 ft. Comment I-3: The site proposes 14, 40-foot light poles. 40' is the height of a three and half story building. The proposed height is not acceptable for commercial centers that are abutting residential neighborhoods. Response I-3: The site is zoned for Community Commercial use which allows a maximum building height of 40 ft. The parking lot design standards in Municipal Code Section 9.150.100 state that light poles in the parking areas are allowed to be the same height as allowed in the underlying zone or 18 ft., whichever is greater. The light poles would be allowed to be 40 ft. per this section of the code. Additionally, the lighting plan for the project shows that there would be no light spillage onto surrounding properties. Comment I-4: The noise study states that: "It is assuming that the development will not operate through the night" (page 3 of noise study). This assumption is wrong, since based on the Specific Plan the convenience store will operate from 5:00 am to 12:00 (until midnight). Therefore, the proposed mitigation measures will not mitigate the noise pollution, since the mitigation measures only may reduce the noise during day and not addressing the noise during night. The noise data was collected from 4:50 pm to 5:50 pm on May 30, 2017 (page 5 of Noise Study). The data (table 2, page 9 of Noise Study) indicates that the noise level exceeds 50 db. (please note 50 db. is the acceptable noise level for sensitive land uses such as residential uses). Even with applying the mitigated measures, the noise level will exceed acceptable noise level (50 db.) for sensitive uses such as residential uses. 307 Response I-4: The City’s Noise Ordinance shows that normal acceptable levels in residential areas are up to 60 dB. Noise limits are 65 dBA from 7 am to 10 pm. The hours of operation for the fuel center would be 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. The projected noise levels from the shopping center would not exceed the normal acceptable levels of 60 dBA or the noise limits in the City’s ordinance of 65 dBA. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration incorporated mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. •Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; •Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; •Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; •The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; •There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: •Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools 308 •Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises •Turn off idling equipment and vehicles •All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers •All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units •Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment •Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum •Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use •Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications •All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 309 April 23, 2018 La Quinta City Council and Planning Commission La Quinta City Hall, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California Ladies and Gentlemen, Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed Pavilion Palms development located at the Northwest corner of Avenue 50 and Jefferson. As it is currently designed, the development will adversely affect the neighboring communities of Palmilla, Renaissance, Mountain View, Citrus, and Estancia. The plan should undergo close scrutiny and extensive modification to minimize noise, light and air pollution, as well as traffic and telecommunications overload. At a minimum, the fuel center/mini mart and five drive through buildings should be eliminated from the plans for several reasons. Noise/light pollution/air quality •Light pollution from the 24 hour operation of a fuel center. •Noise levels from intercoms and drive through service windows. •Off hour and frequent deliveries to a large Pavilions market and restaurants will cause continuous disturbances for the adjacent residences. •Emissions from fast food restaurants and cars idling at drive through service windows will diminish the air quality. Traffic/telecommunication overload •Ave 50 and Jefferson intersection is already heavily traveled and the addition of 300+ cars will create an unsafe traffic egress due to the poorly planned location of the fuel center •There is no transit stop nearby and vehicular traffic will intensify. •Both Avenue 50 and Jefferson are main access routes during festival season and events with high traffic congestion. •Existing telecommunication service in this part of La Quinta is already suboptimal and more development will add to an existing problem. A "LA-Style" strip mall of this magnitude at this location diminishes property values and does not truly fit the small town La Quinta lifestyle. A development with a "village vibe" and farmers market style amenities would better suit the needs and aesthetics of the community. With so much vacant commercial space within the city of La Quinta, we request that the Planning Commission significantly downsize this proposed development and keep large scale commercial developments within the Highway 111/Washington Street corridors. Thank you for your consideration. rec Robert L g 50460 Via Amante La Quinta, CA. 92253 310 April 23, 2017 Robert and Marilyn Lang 50460 Via Amante La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. and Ms. Lang: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment J-1: Noise/light pollution/air quality • Light pollution from the 24 hour operation of a fuel center. • Noise levels from intercoms and drive through service windows. • Off hour and frequent deliveries to a large Pavilions market and restaurants will cause continuous disturbances for the adjacent residences. • Emissions from fast food restaurants and cars idling at drive through service windows will diminish the air quality. Response J-1: Impacts from noise, light pollution and air quality were considered in the project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration. The fuel center operating hours will be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. Additionally, the project’s lighting plan shows that there would be no light spillage onto surrounding properties. Mitigation measures will be implemented during project construction and operations to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. 311 NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Comment J-2: Traffic/telecommunication overload • Ave 50 and Jefferson intersection is already heavily traveled and the addition of 300+ cars will create an unsafe traffic egress due to the poorly planned location of the fuel center 312 • There is no transit stop nearby and vehicular traffic will intensify. • Both Avenue 50 and Jefferson are main access routes during festival season and events with high traffic congestion. • Existing telecommunication service in this part of La Quinta is already suboptimal and more development will add to an existing problem. Response J-2: The proposed project has been planned for in the City’s General Plan and was factored into the growth projections of the General Plan. The Mitigated Negative Declaration evaluated traffic impacts and incorporated Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 to reduce traffic impacts. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Additionally, the City continuously coordinates with Sunline Transit Agency to identify opportunities for transit stop locations. At this time, no transit stops are needed, however, that may change in the future. Telecommunication services are continuously being updated as available. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 313 April 20, 2018 La Quinta – Renaissance Cheri L. Flores clflores@la-quinta.org Senior Planner City of La Quinta Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ms. Flores, As a resident of Renaissance at La Quinta, please accept my respectful opposition of the proposed Pavilion Palms Development on the corner of Jefferson and Ave 50th. Although I appreciate the right of the builder to develop his commercially zoned property, I strongly oppose to the type of use and the potential negative impact on those neighborhoods surrounding the project as well as the City of La Quinta as a whole. The City of La Quinta’s General Plan 2035, among other things, aims to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gasses, to provide high quality community design, to promote efficient use of car, to advocate for expansion of other non-motorized means of transportation, to encourage transportation options that do not rely as much on the automobile, and to improve the health of residences by promoting healthy living practices. The proposed commercial project is upsettingly auto oriented. It is more suitable for the I-10 corridor or Highway 111, not a neighborhood community. The project (among other retail uses) is proposing 2 drive-thru fast food facilities, a late night gas station and mini mart selling alcoholic beverages similar to that proposed on the corner of Washington and avenue 50 a few years back, which was not approved. I do not believe you will find any type of similar development with a gas station, mini mart and fast food drive-thru restaurants off of the Hwy 111 corridor in La Quinta. I don’t believe this location should be the first for our beautiful City or neighbors. Concerns from our neighbors as it relates to noise, increased traffic and its impact on air quality; lighting from a late night gas station, minimart and fast food restaurants; possible increase in crime and an impacted view of the Santa Rosa Mountains are just a few reasons this project should be removed from consideration. Also, as we understand from our April 11th meeting which the developer himself attended, the proposed project does not meet the approved requirements in regards to square footage and density. As a result, an amendment to the approved additional environmental review is needed. 314 Please note the developer has a shopping center within the City of Indio (Showcase at Indio Shopping Center). That center is not being maintained properly. The center is full of trash and debris, with vacant dirt pads that are partially covered with weeds. The trash enclosures are dirty and full of trash. The buildings’ paint is faded and 30% of the parking lot trees are either missing or dead. There are shops with boarded and broken windows. It should also be noted that the Center has not been completed since its approval on 2006 and there are still several empty pads including an empty anchor, Super Target, which closed over a year ago. During our meeting with the Developer on Wednesday April 11th, he stated that he only has the Pavilions committed and once again we could end up with the same scenario as indicated above. Less than half occupied and dying landscape. We already have this at the closed Sam’s club location. An empty warehouse, closed gas station and dying landscape. I would like to add that approving this project, the way it has been proposed, will be a huge missed opportunity for the City of La Quinta and the community as whole. The Applicant does not live in our City or even in the Valley. The Applicant owns a great piece of commercial real estate in La Quinta and plans to build it for financial gain “ONLY”, without paying attention to the City’s General Plan and/or basic elements of urban planning. I find this project to be a public health and safety risk for the citizens and visitors of the great City of La Quinta. I do encourage you to review this proposal thoroughly and reject it to be re-designed and to conform to the City’s General Plan. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me directly. Respectfully, Steven Cenicola 79963 Julee court La Quinta, CA. 92253 scenicola@thevintageclub.com Cc: Linda Evans, Mayor of La Quinta Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Mayor Pro Tem Avail Property Management 315 April 23, 2017 Steve Cenicola 79963 Julee Court La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Mr. Cenicola: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment K-1: Concerns from our neighbors as it relates to noise, increased traffic and its impact on air quality; lighting from a late night gas station, minimart and fast food restaurants; possible increase in crime and an impacted view of the Santa Rosa Mountains are just a few reasons this project should be removed from consideration. Response K-1: The Mitigated Negative Declaration evaluated impacts regarding noise, traffic, air quality and lighting. Regarding noise, hours of operation in the center would be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. A noise study was prepared for the project that evaluated the project’s noise impact on the area and was included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The existing ambient noise in the area which is generated from traffic along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is approximately 65 decibels. The noise study shows that the project would not generate noise levels in excess of this. Additionally, the Mitigated Negative Declaration included mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. 316 NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. • Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier close to the device; • Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drive throughs; • Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; • The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; • There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise-producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on-site deliveries shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Regarding traffic and air quality, Mitigation Measures will be implemented to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 317 Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. Mitigation Measures: Fairway Plaza Amendment 1 - Resolution 2002-006: • All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition, and shall be properly serviced and repaired as needed. ꞏ • Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the project proponent shall demonstrate, or cause to be demonstrated to the Community Development Department that all construction equipment to be utilized shall be low emission, or how the use of low emission construction equipment is infeasible. • Low VOC paints, primers and coatings shall be required for all buildings on the project site. All paints shall be applied using either a high volume/low pressure spray or by hand. • The proposed project shall provide a bus turnout, shelter and associated improvements on Jefferson Street and on Avenue 50, unless Sunline Transit provides written confirmation-that no such turnout(s) or shelters are needed. • As required by the Municipal Code, the businesses operating within the proposed project shall conform to the Transportation Demand Management requirements in place at the time they begin operation. • Deliveries to the project site shall occur during off-peak periods. Mitigation Measures: AIR-1: Contractor is to implement at a minimum a 10-day painting schedule. AIR-2: To the extent feasible, project applicant shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. (added per request by South Coast Air Quality Management District) AIR-3: In accordance with California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines, no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. (added per request by South Coast Air Quality Management District) Additionally, a lighting plan has been designed to result in no light spillage onto surrounding properties. Comment K-2: Also, as we understand from our April 11th meeting which the developer himself attended, the proposed project does not meet the approved requirements in regards to square footage and density. As a result, an amendment to the approved additional environmental review is needed. Response K-2: The applicant has prepared a Specific Plan Amendment and updated Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project which addresses the increase in 318 square footage. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for public review March 23, 2108 through April 23, 2018. Additionally, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allowed under the Community Commercial Zone is 0.30, which would allow up to approximately 162,000 square feet. The project proposes approximately 122,000 square feet, which results in a FAR of 0.22. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 319 Sunl1ne TRANSIT AGENCY A Public Agency April 20, 2018 Cheri Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Pavilion Palms Dear Ms. Cheri Flores: MEMBERS: Desert Ho t Springs Palm Springs Ca thedral City Rancho Mirage Palm Desert Indian Wells La Quinta Indio Coachella Riverside County This letter responds to your request for comments regarding the proposed Pavilion Palms located on the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 within the La Quinta. The SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) staff has reviewed the project and offers the following comments. SunLine staffs assessment conclu des the proposed project will have no impact on transit services. Please keep staff informed of any approvals and/or future changes to the proposed project so we can keep all existing bus stops and services routes current. Additionally, if there is a need for transit service and/or transit amenities in the future, SunLine staff will coordinate it with the City of La Quinta. Should you have questions or concerns regarding this letter, please contact me at 760-343- 3456, ext. 1603. Transit Communications Service Specialist cc: Lauren Skiver, General Manager Stephanie Suriel, Deputy Chief of Administration 32-505 Harry Olive r Trail, Thousand Palms, California 92276 Phone 760-343-3456 Fax 760-343-1986 www.sunline.org 320 April 23, 2017 Anita Petke, Transit Communications Service Specialist 32-505 Harry Oliver Trail Thousand Palms, CA 92276 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON EA 2017-0006 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Anita: Thank you for your comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Pavilion Palms Shopping Center. The comment letter has been marked and is attached. Responses are as follows: Comment L-1: SunLine staff’s assessment concludes the proposed project will have no impact on transit services. Please keep staff informed of any approvals and/or future changes to the proposed project so we can keep all existing bus stops and services routes current. Additionally, if there is a need for transit service and/or transit amenities in the future, SunLine staff will coordinate it with the City of La Quinta. Response L-1: Thank you for your comments. The City will continue to work with Sunline on transit service coordination. Thank you for your participation in the public review process. Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 321 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND Revisions in Response to Comments Received Revisions have been made to the text of the Draft MND for clarification and in response to comments received during the public review period from South Coast Air Quality Management District regarding air quality mitigation measures and in response to revisions in the traffic study. The added air quality mitigation measures reflect typical practices that have been updated since the previous MND was certified in 1999. Following the public comment period for the Draft MND, various Planning Commission and City Council hearings were held between 2018 and 2020 regarding the Project, but the City did not adopt the Draft MND at the time in an effort to continue to work with the developer on aesthetic and other aspects of the Project. In reviewing the November 2020 revisions to the Specific Plan, it was determined that the Project was largely the same as assessed in the March 2018 Initial Study and the revisions proposed are refinements to enhance the Project in accordance with input from the community and City leaders. Because there were no new environmental impacts as a result of the Project revisions, it was unnecessary to re-circulate the Initial Study for public review and comment. The addition of this text does not constitute a substantial revision per Section 15073.5 (c)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. All revisions to the Draft MND are done with new text being underlined, and deleted text stricken through. Text to be revised in Section 1 Introduction, page 1: The Rancho Cielo Specific Plan (SP 1998-034) was approved in May 1999, for a 111,000 sq. ft. shopping center on 12.5 acres at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. A GPA, ZC, and TPM (TPM 29052) were also approved. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved Specific Plan Amendment No. 1, renamed the Fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan, of for Land Use and associated parcel map to allow for the development of 100,460 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center with adjacent retail pads on 12.5 acres at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue. The parcel is designated and zoned for Community Commercial (CC) use. The Specific Plan adoption included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. In 2002, an amendment to the Specific Plan was also adopted. To date, that the project has not been constructed. Currently In May 2018, the Lundin Development is requesting requested the City to authorize Amendment No. 2 to the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan to change the name of the approved Specific Plan to “Pavilion Palms” and construct a total of up to 125,800 square feet of a supermarket-anchored shopping center and adjacent retail pads on the 12.5-acre site at the corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue, within the same area of the previously-approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan, and its subsequent amendment. Amendment No. 2 would add up to 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses. Proposed uses within the commercial center development are similar to the previously approved plan, and include banks, restaurants, gasoline service station, and grocery store (Figure 2). Text to be added to Section 1 Introduction, pages 2-3: The City of La Quinta circulated the “Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center, La Quinta, CA” for a public comment period beginning March 23, 2018 and April 23, 2018. The Initial Study concluded that there were no significant impacts where mitigation measures could not be adopted to reduce potential impacts to less 322 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND than significant. The Initial Study concluded that the City could adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Following the public comment period for the Initial Study, various Planning Commission and City Council hearings were held between 2018 and 2020 regarding the Project, but the City did not adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration at the time in an effort to continue to work with the developer on aesthetic and other aspects of the Project. The applicant was asked to revise the Specific Plan to include the following: • Revise the site plan to provide better pedestrian circulation; • Make the gathering spaces a more cohesive part of the plan; • Incorporate improved shade features; • Consider reducing the amount of parking for the center, in favor of more neighborhood design features; • Move the fuel center further to the north along Jefferson Street to create a more iconic corner at Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street; • Explore not having a left out at the eastern driveway on Avenue 50; • Consider what incorporating mixed uses could do for the center; • Show more detail of the corner plaza; • Revise corner building footprints to have better usable indoor space; and • Show renderings of plaza from outside the center. An additional traffic study was conducted at the request of the City. The results are included in Appendix F and Section XVI. The results of the study revealed no additional impacts. In reviewing the November 2020 revisions to the Specific Plan, it was determined that the Project was largely the same as assessed in the March 2018 Initial Study and the revisions proposed are refinements to enhance the Project in accordance with input from the community and City leaders. Because there were no new environmental impacts as a result of the Project revisions, it was unnecessary to re-circulate the Initial Study for public review and comment. The November 2020 revision to the Initial Study reflects the Project revisions/refinements and the results of the assessment of the revisions/refinements. Text to be revised in Section 3, Detailed Project Description, pages 5-6: Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to amend the previously approved Fairway Specific Plan by changing the name to “Pavilion Palms,” and constructing a total of maximum 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 would add up to 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses to the 100,460 square feet previously approved. The site zoning is Community Commercial, which allows for a 0.30 Maximum Floor Area Ratio ([FAR] gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area). The amended Project, with up to 125,800 square feet represents approximately 0.22 0.23 FAR, below the maximum allowed under the City’s General Plan. 323 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND The Project site consists of five parcels that total approximately 12 acres. The proposed Project will be anchored by Pavilions grocery store and includes restaurants, banks, and retail units, as well as a fuel center/convenience market. In total, the proposed development would provide approximately up to 125,800 square feet (sf) of gross floor area, which is detailed by building and proposed use in Table 1. The Project proposes to split the parcels to a total of 13 to facilitate overall site management. The project is anticipated to be constructed and opened to the public in approximately two years. For this analysis, the project opening day is assumed to be in the year 2020 2021. Access to the Project is proposed via five driveways (labeled A-E in Figure 3): two to the south on Avenue 50 and, two to the east on Jefferson Street. , and one to the north on Derek Alan Drive. (Table 1 Note: This table was used in the March/April 2018 Initial Study to illustrate the various uses. Project revisions have decreased the overall square footage by approximately 810 square feet. Because the November 2020 proposal represents a slight reduction in square footage, it is not necessary to revise this table). Text to be revised in Section 4, Environmental Checklist form, #8 Project Description Summary, page 10: Lundin Development, a private entity, is requesting authorization from the City of La Quinta to amend the previously approved Fairway Plaza Specific Plan by changing the name to “Pavilion Palms,” and constructing a total of maximum 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center development project on the 12-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 would add up to 25,340 square feet of retail and ancillary uses to the 100,460 square feet previously approved. Text to be revised in Section 4-III Air Quality, Environmental Setting, page 21 Lundin Development is proposing a maximum 125,800 square-foot mixed-use commercial center project on approximately 12 acres. In May 1999, the City of La Quinta approved a 100,460 square-foot mixed-use commercial center Specific Plan for the 12-acre Project Site. The approval of the Specific Plan included adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The City also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant and unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the updated General Plan EIR on February 19, 2013. Therefore, the This air quality analysis herein is based on the net increase of approximately 25,340 square-feet of new uses not previously reviewed or approved in the 1999 Specific Plan and subsequent 2012 Updated General Plan. Text to be added to Section 4-III Air Quality, Mitigation Measures, page 27 and to Section 5, Summary of Mitigation Measures, page 83: AIR-2: To the extent feasible, project applicant shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. 324 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND AIR-3: In accordance with California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines, no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. Text to be added to Section 4-XVI Transportation/Traffic, page 71-72: An updated traffic study was completed in July 2019 per the request of the City to study additional intersections (Appendix E). The 2017 Traffic Study studied the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. The 2019 Traffic Study analyzed the following intersections: •Jefferson Street at Avenue 48 •Jefferson Street at Avenue 49 •Avenue 50 at Park Avenue •Jefferson Street at Avenue 50 •Avenue 50 at Madison Street •Jefferson Street at Pomelo •Jefferson Street at Avenue 52 •Jefferson Street at N project driveway •Avenue 50 at E project driveway To analyze the “existing conditions + project traffic” scenario, the expected project trips were added to the existing traffic volumes at the study intersections according to the anticipated project trip distribution, while the pass-by project trips are added back into the traffic volumes only at the project driveways. Additional traffic from a planned expansion of the existing Citrus Plaza, located across Jefferson Street from the proposed Project site, was also added to the opening day traffic volumes, based on project details obtained from the applicant developer and City of Indio staff, to ensure cumulative traffic impacts were analyzed. The 2019 Traffic study identified that all of the Project intersections operate at a similar level of service, with the Project or without the Project, and including ambient growth and growth from the neighboring Citrus Plaza. Text to be revised in Section 4-XVI Transportation/Traffic, page 73: The July 2017 traffic study indicated that without the project, the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 will operate at LOS D, assuming a 2 percent ambient growth rate in the area (Albert Grover and Associates, July 27, 2017, Appendix E, Table 3). Assuming the ambient area growth, plus the new expected project trips, as well as the additional westbound through lane capacity, and implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 and project improvements listed above, the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is expected to operate at its current LOS D, which is an acceptable level of service per the General Plan and EB 06-13., and the proposed full-access driveway on Avenue 50 will operate at LOS A at opening day conditions. However, some delays are expected for vehicles entering traffic on 325 City of La Quinta Fairway Plaza Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 “Pavilion Palms” Shopping Center EA2017-0006 Final MND Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 from the project driveways, which are expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. Per EB 06-13, however, this is considered acceptable traffic operations conditions for a stop control at a driveway location. Therefore, the impact of this criterion is anticipated to be less than significant with mitigation. The results of the 2019 Traffic Study identified that all the additional intersections studied with the Project, without the Project, and with the ambient growth of the area, including the Citrus Plaza development, will continue to operate LOS D during AM and PM peak hours, which is the same operating condition without the Project. The impact of this criterion is anticipated to be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 as previously identified. 326 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS AESTHETICS AES-1 Provide shielding for the dual head pole in the southwest corner as per the lighting design engineering recommendations. AIR QUALITY AIR-1: Contractor is to implement at a minimum a 10-day painting schedule. AIR-2: AIR-2: To the extent feasible, project applicant shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AIR-3: In accordance with California Air Resources Board’s idling policy guidelines, no delivery vehicles may idle for more than five consecutive minutes. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO - 1: Any grubbing, brushing or tree removal should be conducted outside of the State identified nesting season for migratory birds, which is typically March 15 through September 1. 327 BIO – 1 (continued): If work cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a migratory nesting bird survey within and adjacent to the project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three (3) days prior to initiating the construction activities. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) will be prepared and implemented. At a minimum, the NBP will include guidelines for addressing active nests, establishing buffers, monitoring, and reporting. The NBP will include a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and an appropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from direct and indirect impact. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be determined by the biologist, and shall be based on the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, and expected types of disturbance. The nests and 328 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS BIO – 1 (continued): buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing, within which no vegetation clearing or ground disturbance shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and a monitoring report has been submitted reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta 329 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified archeological monitor. In the event unanticipated archaeological resources are discovered: • The archaeological monitor shall notify the project foreman • The Archaeological monitor has the authority to temporarily halt work in the area of archaeological discoveries until the resource has been evaluated • All work in the vicinity of the find shall halt • Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until written notification is received from the Project archaeologist 330 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS CUL-2: Grading activities shall be overseen by a qualified paleontological monitor. Paleontological monitors should be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed, to avoid construction delays, and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Monitoring will be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units as described by the San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Sciences May 2, 2017 report are not present, or if present are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. CUL-3: If human remains are encountered during the undertaking, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition 331 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS CUL-3 (continued): pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The local authorities must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-1 Prior to grading plan approval, submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, a PMl0 management plan. GEO-2 For portions of the site not immediately under construction, ensure the stabilization of soils through the use of soil cement or re-vegetation, frequent watering. including watering during the evening and weekends during significant wind events; street sweeping or washing during construction, and the chemical stabilization of unpaved construction roadways. 332 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAZ – 1 A hazardous spill prevention plan shall be prepared by the Applicant and submitted to the City for approval to minimize the likelihood of a spill shall be prepared prior to construction. The plan shall state the actions that would be required if a spill occurs to prevent contamination of surface waters and provide for cleanup of the spill. The plan shall follow Federal, state, and local safety guidelines and standards to avoid increased exposure to these pollutants. HAZ – 2 If a contaminated area is encountered during construction, construction shall cease in the vicinity of the contaminated area. The construction contractor shall notify all appropriate authorities, including the EPA and the City. If necessary, the contaminated site shall be remediated to minimize the potential for exposure of the public and to allow the Project to be safety constructed. 333 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HYD-1 Prior to Project approval, the Project Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that shall, at minimum, include the following: • Identifies all project related pollutants, impacts to the site’s hydrologic condition, and potential impacts to local waterways caused by Project post-construction runoff; • Identifies BMPs required to remove pollutants from the Projects’ post construction runoff and prevent downstream hydromodification; • Identifies parties responsible for long term operation and maintenance activities of all BMPs; • Identifies the design, operation and maintenance of the underground stormwater collection system. 334 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS NOISE NOI-1 It is recommended that the Pavilions delivery dock is enclosed with walls and a roof, and that an acoustically absorptive material is used to partially line the internal walls to control noise build up. This will limit potential disturbance from unloading. NOI-2 Vehicle loading and unloading for all retail units should be carried out in a quiet manner. NOI-3 It is recommended that HVAC equipment on roofs is screened by a noise barrier from the residences. This barrier should at a minimum, provide line of sight screening. NOI-4 It is recommended that noisy HVAC equipment at grade is enclosed with CMU walls at least 2 feet higher than the equipment. NOI-5 It is recommended that noise from HVAC equipment is limited to 60 dB(A) at the site boundary. 335 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS NOI-6 Reduce the noise from the audible devices for the drive-through eating establishments using any and/or all methods as follows: •Position devices away from the site boundary to the south. •Provide additional screening such as positioning of the retail buildings or a noise barrier as close to the device; •Reduce the number of audible devices, such as one device to serve two drivethroughs; •Orient the device perpendicular to the vehicle and at ear height, with the device aimed at the listener in the vehicle; •The sound from the devices should be limited to a maximum of 75 dB(A) at 3 feet; •There shall be no annunciator tones, whistles, beeps or other characteristic sounds. NOI-7 Lay out the site working to keep noise- producing activities as far as possible from residences, minimize the use of backup alarms, and minimize truck activity and truck queuing near the residential areas. 336 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: • Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools • Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises • Turn off idling equipment and vehicles • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units • Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment • Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum • Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use • Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications • All on-site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m. 337 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS NOI-8 Perform construction in a manner to minimize noise where practicable. For example: •Where practicable, use hydraulic rather than pneumatic impact tools •Operate equipment to minimize banging, clattering, buzzing, and other annoying types of noises •Turn off idling equipment and vehicles •All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers •All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent potential residential units •Phase in start-up and shut-down of site equipment •Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling operations to keep noise to a minimum •Limit the time that steel decking or plates for street decking or covering excavated areas are in use •Limit the use of annunciators or public address systems, except for emergency notifications •All on-site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m. 338 MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY STATUS / DATE / INITIALS TRAFFIC TRAF-1 Prior to recordation of the Final Tentative Parcel Map, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of La Quinta and post security to design and construct at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street two eastbound left turn lanes on Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street if required by the Planning Commission. TRIBAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES TRC-1 Native American Monitor(s) from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians or Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians should be present during the initial grading/ground disturbing activities. 339 340 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBERS: SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 APPLICANT: LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on March 2, 2021, hold a continued Public Hearing to consider a request by Lundin Development Company for approval of the Pavilion Palms Shopping Center, consisting of approximately 125,800 sq. ft., generally located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 more particularly described as: APN 602-180-004 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on June 26, 2020 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a continued Public Hearing on December 15, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing to a date certain, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and did recommend that the Planning Commission review modified site design of the project, specifically at the corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California on January 26 and February 17, 2021, did review modified site design of the project, and did recommend Council approval of the modified site design; and 341 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 2 of 12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a continued Public Hearing on October 6, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to a date certain, to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package, and did refer a portion of the application back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation on adding a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did discuss on November 24, 2020, a provision to the Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2017-0002) to allow for taller building height along image corridors and did not recommend the City Council add this provision; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold continued Public Hearings on May 5, and July 7, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearings to dates certain, at the applicant’s request to allow the applicant additional time to revise the site plan and prepare the revised application package; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold duly noticed Public Hearings on February 4 and March 3, 2020, to consider this project and continued the Public Hearings to dates certain, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a continued Public Hearing on December 10, 2019, and recommended Council approval of this project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a continued Public Hearing on October 8, 2019 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing to a date certain, to allow the applicant time to revise the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 26, 2018 to consider this project and continued the Public Hearing, to allow the applicant time to revise the traffic study and include an analysis of other intersections in the area; and 342 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 3 of 12 Specific Plan (Amendment) 2017-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council, having great deference in interpreting the project’s consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies, knowing that it is nearly impossible for a project to be in perfect conformity with each and every General Plan Goal and Policy (Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490, 1510-1511), did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.240.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Specific Plan: 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that it will result in the development of an approximate 125,800 sq. ft. shopping center which is permitted in the General Commercial land use designation. The proposed project is consistent with and would not frustrate the Goals and Policies of the General Plan as follows: Goals LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. Policy LU-2.2 which requires Specific Plans for projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. This project proposes variations from several development standards; therefore, a Specific Plan is appropriate for the project. Policy CIR-1.12 to reduce vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City by the development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. This project proposes a shopping center near residences which would provide jobs near housing and provide goods and services near residences to shorten vehicle miles traveled. 343 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 4 of 12 Policy CIR-2.3 to develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi-use paths to places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas by providing sidewalks on Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street along the project’s frontage as well as walkable areas within the project site. Policy SC-1.6 to expand the City’s alternative transportation network by providing sidewalks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street to connect gaps in the City’s sidewalk system. Program PR-1.8.c: to promote and improve public access to farmers markets and grocery stores that sell fresh produce and healthy foods with the establishment of a supermarket at the site. Policy AQ-1.6 which states that proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. The project’s MND analyzed these and determined that mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Policy BIO-1.2 which states that site-specific, species-specific surveys shall be required for species not covered by the MSHCP. The project’s MND includes mitigation that requires pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl, which is not a covered species under the MSHCP. GOAL CUL-1 which supports protection of significant archaeological, historic and paleontological resources which occur in the City. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to include a tribal monitor during ground disturbing activities. GOAL N-1 which supports a healthful noise environment which complements the City’s residential and resort character. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. 344 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 5 of 12 GOAL GEO-1 which supports the protection of the residents’ health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. The project’s MND determined that with implementation of required building and seismic code standards, the project would have a less than significant impact on geological resources. Policy FH-1.3 which states that the City shall continue to implement development standards that provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and are consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. The project is consistent with this policy since underground retention will be provided that will contain the 100-year storm for the site. Policy PF-1.3 which states that the City shall identify all viable financing mechanisms for the funding of construction, maintenance and operation of municipal facilities. The project will be required to pay development impact fees which is a funding mechanism for municipal facilities and public services. The project conceptual landscape design is consistent with Goal WR-1 and Policy UTL-1.2 as it will result in the efficient use and conservation of the City’s water resources. 2. Public Welfare Approval of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 3. Land Use Compatibility The proposed Specific Plan incorporates a land use that is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties. The property will continue to be zoned as Community Commercial which is intended to provide for the 345 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 6 of 12 sale of general merchandise, hardware and building materials, food, drugs, sundries, personal services and similar goods and services to meet the needs of multi-neighborhood area. The proposed shopping center would result in a floor area ratio of 0.23, which is below the allowed 0.30 floor area ratio in the Community Commercial zone. 4. Property Suitability The uses permitted in the Specific Plan are suitable and appropriate for the subject property in that the site is relatively flat, vacant, and the area can be served by all necessary public services and utilities. The proposed project is located at the intersection of arterial streets and provides convenience to goods and services to residential neighborhoods in the vicinity. Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map: 1. Tentative Parcel Map 37370 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, and Specific Plan 2017-0002 as proposed. The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Commercial land use designation as set forth in the General Plan, and as set forth in Specific Plan 2017- 0002. 2. The design and improvement of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, and Specific Plan 2017- 0002 with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval. 3. The design of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 346 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 7 of 12 environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4. The design of Tentative Parcel Map 37370 and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the project will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality and other public health issues. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development given the site’s location at the corner of two arterial roadways and the site is relatively flat, vacant, and can be served by all necessary public services and utilities. 6. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of the code, and the Subdivision Map Act. 7. The design and improvements required for Tentative Parcel Map 37370 will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property. All roadway improvements, easements, if any and surrounding improvements will be completed to City standards. Site Development Permit 2017-0009 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council, having great deference in interpreting the project’s consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies, knowing that it is nearly impossible for a project to be in perfect conformity with each and every General Plan Goal and Policy (Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490, 1510-1511), did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 347 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 8 of 12 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The City’s General Plan policies relating to General Commercial encourage shopping centers in the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with and would not frustrate the Goals and Policies of the General Plan as follows: Goals LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. Policy LU-2.2 which requires Specific Plans for projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. This project proposes variations from several development standards; therefore, a Specific Plan is appropriate for the project. Policy CIR-1.12 to reduce vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City by the development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. This project proposes a shopping center near residences which would provide jobs near housing and provide goods and services near residences to shorten vehicle miles traveled. Policy CIR-2.3 to develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi-use paths to places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas by providing sidewalks on Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street along the project’s frontage as well as walkable areas within the project site. Policy SC-1.6 to expand the City’s alternative transportation network by providing sidewalks along Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street to connect gaps in the City’s sidewalk system. Program PR-1.8.c: to promote and improve public access to farmers markets and grocery stores that sell fresh produce and 348 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 9 of 12 healthy foods with the establishment of a supermarket at the site. Policy AQ-1.6 which states that proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. The project’s MND analyzed these and determined that mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Policy BIO-1.2 which states that site-specific, species-specific surveys shall be required for species not covered by the MSHCP. The project’s MND includes mitigation that requires pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl, which is not a covered species under the MSHCP. GOAL CUL-1 which supports protection of significant archaeological, historic and paleontological resources which occur in the City. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to include a tribal monitor during ground disturbing activities. GOAL N-1 which supports a healthful noise environment which complements the City’s residential and resort character. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. GOAL GEO-1 which supports the protection of the residents’ health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. The project’s MND determined that with implementation of required building and seismic code standards, the project would have a less than significant impact on geological resources. Policy FH-1.3 which states that the City shall continue to implement development standards that provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and are consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. The project is consistent with this policy since underground retention will be provided that will contain the 100-year storm for the site. 349 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 10 of 12 Policy PF-1.3 which states that the City shall identify all viable financing mechanisms for the funding of construction, maintenance and operation of municipal facilities. The project will be required to pay development impact fees which is a funding mechanism for municipal facilities and public services. The project conceptual landscape design is consistent with Goal WR-1 and Policy UTL-1.2 as it will result in the efficient use and conservation of the City’s water resources. 2. Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Community Commercial District as well as the development standards of the City’s Zoning Code and Specific Plan 2017-0002 in terms of architectural style and landscaping. The project satisfies the District’s intent to provide for the sale of general merchandise, hardware and building materials, food, drugs, sundries, personal services and similar goods and services to meet the needs of multi-neighborhood area. The project is generally consistent with the non-residential development standards and permitted use table, except deviations that include requested reductions from landscape setback standards, increased retail building size, and allowance of automotive service station as a permitted use. These development standard and land use deviations may be approved with the Specific Plan Amendment. 3. Compliance with CEQA The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4. Architectural Design The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, 350 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 11 of 12 architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 5. Site Design The site design of the project including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 6. Landscape Design Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the City Council does hereby approve Specific Plan 2017-0002 subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as “Exhibit A,” incorporated herewith by this reference. SECTION 3. That the City Council does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as “Exhibit B,” and incorporated herewith by this reference. 351 Council Resolution No. 2021 - XXX Specific Plan 2017-0002; Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TPM 37370); Site Development Permit 2017-0009 Project: Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Adopted: Month XX, 2021 Page 12 of 12 SECTION 4. That the City Council does hereby approve Site Development Permit 2017-0009 subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as “Exhibit C,” and incorporated herewith by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 2nd day of March 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ WILLIAM IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 352 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020 – XXX – “EXHIBIT A” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 1998-034, AMENDMENT 2) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 1 OF 2 SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Specific Plan 2017-0002 shall be developed in compliance with these conditions, and the approved Specific Plan document. In the event of any conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of Specific Plan 2017- 0002, these conditions shall take precedence. 3. Specific Plan 2017-0002 shall comply with all applicable terms, conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 1998-375 and 2017-0006 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (TTM 37370) Site Development Permit 2017-0009 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 4. Within 30 days of City Council approval, applicant shall provide an electronic copy (.pdf) and three bound paper copies of the Final Specific Plan document to the Design and Development Department. The Final Specific Plan shall include all text and graphics, all amendments per this action, and correction of any typographical errors, internal document inconsistencies, and other amendments deemed necessary by the Planning Manager. 5. Fuel center operating hours shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. as stated in the Specific Plan. Any changes that need to be made to these hours after approval of the Specific Plan shall be subject to approval by the Design and Development Director. 6. Representatives from tribes within the project vicinity commented and have requested the following considerations: 353 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020 – XXX – “EXHIBIT A” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 1998-034, AMENDMENT 2) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 2 OF 2 A. The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be onsite during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). B. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 354 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 1 of 22 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Parcel Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Parcel Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the “Subdivision Map Act”), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (“LQMC”). 3. Applicant shall work with the Design and Development Department to finalize Tentative Parcel Map package, including but not limited to, tentative parcel map and preliminary grading and drainage plan, within 60 days of City Council approval. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: Riverside County Fire Marshal La Quinta Development Services Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) La Quinta Planning Division Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Imperial Irrigation District (IID) California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) State Water Resources Control Board SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) 355 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 2 of 22 The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California General Construction Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 356 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 3 of 22 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required. 7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 10. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the 357 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 4 of 22 City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R’s for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit and execute an “AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY” form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 11. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 12. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 13. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – 64 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 128-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – 54 feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 for a total 108-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 358 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 5 of 22 14. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1” equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 15. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights-of- way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 16. The applicant shall create minimum perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights-of-way as follows: A. Jefferson Street - 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 50 - 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately-owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 359 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 6 of 22 18. Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative parcel map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map. 19. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 20. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 21. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. 22. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 23. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) a. Widen the west side of the street along frontage as necessary in order to accommodate deceleration/right turn only lanes serving the two entrances to the project. 360 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 7 of 22 b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide the left turn in with physical left turn out restriction and restore the median landscaping. c. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer d. Reconstruct sidewalk improvements as needed and applicant to reimburse City for sidewalk improvements made to applicant’s frontage through the City’s Capital Improvement Program. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. A deceleration/right turn only lane serving the entrances to the project as approved by the City Engineer c. 12-foot wide landscaped median along the entire boundary of the project plus variable width as needed to accommodate for a left turn lane into the easterly Avenue 50 project entry and for a left turn lane for eastbound Avenue 50 traffic at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street as approved by the City Engineer. d. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer e. 6-foot wide sidewalk—The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include a non-curb adjacent 6-foot wide sidewalk along Avenue 50 at a minimum distance of 4 feet from the street curb. The site plan and landscape plan shall be reviewed and 361 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 8 of 22 approved by the City Engineer and Planning Manager prior to construction. f. The applicant is responsible for the cost to design and install dual eastbound left turn lanes to northbound Jefferson Street when determined by the City Engineer and a traffic study prepared for the applicant per Engineering Bulletin #06-13 that the left-turn volumes cannot be adequately served by the single left-turn lane. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post separate security for the cost to design and install the dual eastbound left turn lanes. This obligation will remain in effect for 10 years after recordation of the final map unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 3) Jefferson Street/Avenue 50 Intersection: All necessary traffic signal modifications in the northwest quadrant of the intersection and any other modifications warranted by the timing and traffic generation of this development. 4) Other required improvements in the right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 24. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Jefferson Street (northerly): Right turn in, right turn out, and left turn in movements are permitted. Left turn out movements are prohibited. Jefferson Street (southerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. 362 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 9 of 22 Avenue 50 (westerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (easterly): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. 25. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 26. The applicant shall install a transition for the eastbound Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street left turn lane that separates the turn lane from the left turn lane into the shopping center from eastbound Avenue 50. This transition will keep the left turn queue for Jefferson Street from backing up into the median break for the shopping center full turn movement. FINAL MAPS 27. Prior to the City’s approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. The Final Map shall be 1” = 40’ scale. PARKING and ACCESS POINTS 28. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. 363 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 10 of 22 One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 29. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6” P.C.C./4” c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 31. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid-block street lighting is not required. 32. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access 364 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 11 of 22 gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 33. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 34. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Division. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On-Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal D. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. Off-Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical F. Off-Site Signing & Striping Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal The Off-Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. 365 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 12 of 22 G. On Site Sewer and Water Improvement Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal H. On-Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical I. On-Site Precise Grading Plan 1” = 30’ Horizontal (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off-Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. “Rough Grading” plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top of Wall & Top of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. The applicant shall prepare an accessibility assessment on a marked-up print of the building floor plan identifying every building egress and notes the 2016 California Building Code accessibility requirements associated with each door. The assessment must comply with submittal requirements of the Building & Safety Division. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 35. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the “Plans, 366 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 13 of 22 Notes and Design Guidance” section of the Design and Development Department at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Design and Development Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 36. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 37. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 38. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off-site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 39. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 367 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 14 of 22 40. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 41. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 42. When improvements are phased through a “Phasing Plan,” or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off-site improvements and common on-site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 43. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Parcel Map, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Tentative Parcel Map. 368 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 15 of 22 D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off-Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off-Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20% Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 44. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on-site and off-site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant’s detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 45. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 46. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 47. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 369 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 16 of 22 48. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A WQMP prepared by an appropriate professional registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 49. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 50. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The 370 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 17 of 22 maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 51. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 52. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 53. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 54. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 55. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 56. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Pavilions Plaza Commercial Development project (TPM37370 and SDP2017-0009), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 371 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 18 of 22 Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 57. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06- 16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100-year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3-hour, 6 hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total run off. 58. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 59. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 60. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 61. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 62. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 63. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape 372 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 19 of 22 setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 64. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 65. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 66. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 67. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. 373 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 20 of 22 UTILITIES 68. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 69. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 70. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 71. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 72. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly-maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 73. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 374 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 21 of 22 74. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 75. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 76. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Commission for their approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) and 9.150.080 (Parking Facility Design Standards). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property. Security lighting along the west elevation of the anchor building shall be installed below 20 ft. in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property and not shine directly onto neighboring residences. Any illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 77. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 78. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 79. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Commission approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 80. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance 375 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2017-0003 (TPM 37370) PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 22 of 22 requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 81. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. 82. All vacant pads shall be planted with drought tolerant landscaping and decomposed granite and shall include fencing as appropriate so long as they are vacant. The installation of all landscaping and decomposed granite, and fencing as appropriate, shall be completed prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy of the Pavilions store. Any landscaping on vacant pads shall be irrigated and maintained regularly. The final landscape plan for the project shall include plans for fencing, landscaping, irrigation (as applicable), and maintenance for vacant pads. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. PUBLIC SERVICES 83. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 84. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 85. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 86. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 376 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 1 of 27 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Site Development Permit 2017-0009 shall comply with all applicable conditions for the following related approval(s): Environmental Assessment 2017-0006 Tentative Parcel Map 2017-0003 (Tentative Parcel Map 37370) Specific Plan 2017-0002 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Director of Design and Development shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. Applicant shall work with the Design and Development Department to finalize Site Development Permit plan package, including but not limited to, elevations, roof plans, shell plans, materials board, preliminary landscape plans, and lighting plans, within 60 days of City Council approval. 4. Pad Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 shall require, prior to construction of any structures, a Site Development Permit to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. The architectural and landscaping design for these pad buildings shall be congruous with the design approved in Site Development Permit 2017-0006. 5. The Site Development Permit shall expire two years from City Council approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080, unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 377 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 2 of 27 6. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: Riverside County Fire Marshal La Quinta Development Services Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) La Quinta Planning Division Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Imperial Irrigation District (IID) California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) State Water Resources Control Board SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 7. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 8. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. 378 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 3 of 27 A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required. 9. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents 379 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 4 of 27 or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 11. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 12. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R’s for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit and execute an “AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY” form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 380 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 5 of 27 14. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, site development permit, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 15. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – 64 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 128-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – 54 feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 for a total 108-foot ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 16. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the rough grading plans submitted for plan checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1” equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 17. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary prior to approval of the improvements dedicating such right-of- way, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 381 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 6 of 27 18. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights-of-way as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) – Minimum 18-foot from the R/W- P/L. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) – Minimum 18-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately-owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 19. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 20. Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative parcel map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map 21. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 22. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property after the date of approval of the Site Development Permit unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. 382 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 7 of 27 24. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 25. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) a. Widen the west side of the street along frontage as necessary in order to accommodate deceleration/right turn only lanes serving the two entrances to the project. b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide the left turn in with physical left turn out restriction and restore the median landscaping. c. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer d. Reconstruct sidewalk improvements as needed and applicant to reimburse City for sidewalk improvements made to applicant’s frontage through the City’s Capital Improvement Program. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. A deceleration/right turn only lane serving the 383 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 8 of 27 entrances to the project as approved by the City Engineer c. 12-foot wide landscaped median along the entire boundary of the project plus variable width as needed to accommodate for a left turn lane into the easterly Avenue 50 project entry and for a left turn lane for eastbound Avenue 50 traffic at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street as approved by the City Engineer. d. Class II bike lane as approved by the City Engineer e. 6-foot wide sidewalk—The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include a non-curb adjacent 6-foot wide sidewalk along Avenue 50 at a minimum distance of 4 feet from the street curb. The site plan and landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Manager prior to construction. f. The applicant is responsible for the cost to design and install dual eastbound left turn lanes to northbound Jefferson Street when determined by the City Engineer and a traffic study prepared for the applicant per Engineering Bulletin #06-13 that the left-turn volumes cannot be adequately served by the single left-turn lane. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post separate security for the cost to design and install the dual eastbound left turn lanes. This obligation will remain in effect for 10 years after recordation of the final map unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 3) Jefferson Street/Avenue 50 Intersection: All necessary traffic signal modifications in the northwest quadrant of the intersection and any other modifications warranted by the timing and traffic generation of this development. 384 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 9 of 27 4) Other required improvements in the right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 26. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Jefferson Street (northerly): Right turn in, right turn out, and left turn in movements are permitted. Left turn out movements are prohibited. Jefferson Street (southerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (westerly): Right turn in and right turn out movements are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements are prohibited. Avenue 50 (easterly): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. 27. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 28. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. 385 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 10 of 27 C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 29. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6” P.C.C./4” c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design 386 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 11 of 27 gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 31. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid-block street lighting is not required. 32. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 33. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 34. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Design and Development Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On-Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal D. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. 387 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 12 of 27 E. Off-Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical F. Off-Site Signing & Striping Plan 1” = 40’ Horizontal The Off-Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On Site Sewer and Water Improvement Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal H. On-Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical I. On-Site Precise Grading Plan 1” = 30’ Horizontal (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off-Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Design and Development Department. “Rough Grading” plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top of Wall & Top of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & 388 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 13 of 27 gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 35. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the “Plans, Notes and Design Guidance” section of the Public Works Development Division at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Design and Development Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 36. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the mylars of all approved improvement plans acceptable to the City Engineer. 37. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 38. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off-site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 39. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 389 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 14 of 27 40. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 41. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 42. When improvements are phased through a “Phasing Plan,” or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off-site improvements and common on-site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the commercial center proceeds in phases, the first phase of development shall include the construction and completion of the Anchor tenant building and associated fuel center, Shop 1, project landscaping and parking areas. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 43. Depending on the timing of the development of this Site Development Permit, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. 390 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 15 of 27 B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Site Development Permit. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off-Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off-Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20% Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 44. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on-site and off-site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant’s detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 45. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 391 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 16 of 27 GRADING 46. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 47. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 48. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 392 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 17 of 27 49. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 50. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 51. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 52. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 53. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 54. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit Site Plan, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance finding review. 55. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. 393 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 18 of 27 Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 56. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Pavilions Plaza Commercial Development project (TPM37370 and SDP2017-0009), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 57. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06- 16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100-year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3-hour, 6 hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total run off. 58. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 59. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 60. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 394 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 19 of 27 61. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 62. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 63. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 64. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 65. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 66. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 67. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7- 395 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 20 of 27 2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 68. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 69. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 70. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 71. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. 396 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 21 of 27 CONSTRUCTION 72. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly-maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 73. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 74. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 75. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 76. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Commission for their approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Sections 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) and 9.150.080 (Parking Facility Design Standards). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property. Security lighting along the west elevation of the anchor building shall be installed below 20 ft. in height and shall be shielded to minimize trespass of light off the property and not shine directly onto neighboring residences. Any illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 77. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 78. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 397 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 22 of 27 79. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Commission approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 80. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 81. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. 82. Applicant/Developer shall install paving patterns, such as stamped concrete or decorative colored pavers, to delineate and differentiate pedestrian-oriented areas throughout the project from the vehicular circulation, parking areas, ingress and egress, to minimize conflicts between pedestrian and vehicle traffic. Paving patterns shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. PUBLIC SERVICES 83. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 84. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 85. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. 398 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 23 of 27 FEES AND DEPOSITS 86. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 87. Fire Hydrants and Fire Flow: Applicant and/or developer shall separately provide one copy of off-site water system plans detailing existing/proposed fire hydrant(s) and main(s) capable of delivering the minimum fire flow, per CFC Appendix B Table B105.1, within 400 feet to all portions around the proposed structure(s). Minimum fire hydrant location and spacing shall comply with the CFC and NFPA 24. Reference current California Fire Code (CFC) 507.5.1. Plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer and/or water purveyor prior to Fire Marshal review and approval. Mylar will be signed by the Fire Marshal after review and approval. A. Transportation hydrants shall be added to Jefferson and Avenue 50 in compliance with CFC Appendix C Table C102.1 for the frontage of the project. 88. Fire Department Access: Provide a site plan for fire apparatus access roads and signage. Access roads shall be provided to within 150 feet to all portions of all buildings and shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet. The construction of the access roads shall be all weather and capable of sustaining 60,000 lbs. over two axels for commercial developments. Ref. CFC 503.1.1 and 503.2.1 as amended by the City of La Quinta. 89. Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Ref. CFC 503.4.1 90. Grading Permit Fire Department Review: Submittal to the Office of the Fire Marshal for Precise Grading Permit will be required. 91. Construction Permits Fire Department Review: Submittal of construction plans to the Office of the Fire Marshal for development, construction, 399 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 24 of 27 installation and operational use permitting will be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Office of the Fire Marshal reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code, and related codes, which are in effect at the time of building plan submittal. 92. Phased Construction Access: If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access for fire protection prior to any construction. Ref. CFC 503.1 93. Fire Sprinkler System: All new commercial structures 3,600 square feet or larger will be required to install a fire sprinkler system. Ref. CFC 903.2 as amended by the City of La Quinta. 94. Fire Alarm and Detection System: A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required and determined at time of building plan review. Ref. CFC 903.4, CFC 907.2 and NFPA 72 95. Knox Box and Gate Access: Buildings shall be provided with a Knox Box. The Knox Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. All electronically operated gates shall be provided with Knox key switches and automatic sensors for access. Ref. CFC 506.1 96. Addressing: All commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side and additional locations as required. Ref. CFC 505.1 and County of Riverside Office of the Fire Marshal Standard #07-01 97. Landscape clearances: A minimum 3-feet radius clear of vegetation shall be maintained around fire protection equipment, valves and services requiring access. This includes Backflow Valves, Post-Indicator Valves, Fire Department Connections, Fire Hydrants, etc. 98. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Systems: Projects that do not meet the exceptions set forth by the Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal shall provide plans for an emergency responder radio coverage system. Ref. CFC 510.1 and Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Technical Policy #TP19-002 400 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 25 of 27 BUILDING DIVISION 99. Building Plans prepared for permitting shall meet applicable California Building Codes effective at the time of submittal. 100. Any building, structure, facility, complex or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public shall be provided barrier free design to ensure that these improvements are accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities. Plans shall fully detail how the proposed facility complies with the California Accessibility Standards defined in Title 24 Chapter 11B and Federal ADA Regulations. MISCELLANEOUS 101. Representatives from tribes within the project vicinity commented and have requested the following considerations: A. The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be onsite during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). B. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 102. The County Coroner shall be contacted if human remains are identified during earthmoving activities. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted. The NAHC will make a determination of the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). The City and the landowner will work with the designated MLD to determine the final disposition of the remains. 103. No signage is permitted with this approval. A separate permit from the Design and Development Department is required for any temporary or permanent signs. 104. The applicant shall submit exhibits to the Planning Manager and City Engineer that demonstrate vehicles can turn into approved drive aisles 401 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 26 of 27 for drive through facilities in one continuous movement prior to precise grading plan approval. The applicant shall modify drive aisle entries for drive through facilities on precise grading and building construction plans if the Planning Manager and City Engineer determine such modifications are necessary to accommodate vehicles turning into drive aisles. 105. The applicant shall install a transition for the eastbound Avenue 50 to northbound Jefferson Street left turn lane that separates the turn lane from the left turn lane into the shopping center from eastbound Avenue 50. This transition will keep the left turn queue for Jefferson Street from backing up into the median break for the shopping center full turn movement. 106. Applicant/Developer shall add metal louvres as a decorative element to the fuel center canopy consistent with the architecture of the convenience store building. The metal louvres shall be reviewed and approved during building plan check. 107. The size of Building 7 shall be no larger than 825 square feet and shall not include the sale of alcoholic beverages. 108. Public Art shall be dedicated on the project site or the Applicant/Developer shall pay a development fee pursuant to the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 2.65 Art in Public Places. 109. All vacant pads shall be planted with drought tolerant landscaping and decomposed granite and shall include fencing as appropriate so long as they are vacant. The installation of all landscaping and decomposed granite, and fencing as appropriate, shall be completed prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy of the Pavilions store. Any landscaping on vacant pads shall be irrigated and maintained regularly. The final landscape plan for the project shall include plans for fencing, landscaping, irrigation (as applicable), and maintenance for vacant pads. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. 110. The applicant shall add shade features and seating to the interior corner plaza areas and shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. 111. The project sign program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing prior to construction. 402 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2021-XXX – “EXHIBIT C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2017-0009 PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER ADOPTED: MONTH XX, 2021 Page 27 of 27 112. The height of parking lot lighting shall not exceed 20 feet and shall be approved with the final landscape plans by the Planning Commission prior to construction. 113. The applicant shall install a minimum of 12 electric vehicle charging facilities in the anchor tenant’s parking lot on an accessible route per CBC 11B-228.3. Any future electric vehicle charging facilities in addition to these 12 shall be designed on an accessible route to facilitate compliance once they are installed. 114. The landscape architect shall identify standards for planting, irrigation and maintenance in the final landscape plan and the standards shall be included in Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which shall be recorded on the Property and shall be reviewed and approved by the City. 115. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store, applicant shall record Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) on the Property. The CC&Rs shall (1) require minimum covenants for satisfactory, perpetual maintenance obligations on the Property; (2) name the City of La Quinta as an express third party beneficiary; (3) be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation; and (4) state that the CC&Rs cannot be amended without prior written consent of the City. 116. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store, applicant shall execute and record a maintenance agreement with the Renaissance HOA and the Palmilla HOA. The agreement shall (1) be imposed as an equitable servitude on the Property (2) require satisfactory, perpetual maintenance of the Property, (3) name the City as an express third party beneficiary; (4) be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation; and (5) state that the maintenance agreement cannot be amended without prior written consent of the City. If the applicant shows substantial evidence that the Renaissance and Palmilla HOA’s are not negotiating in good faith, the applicant may provide the evidence to the Design and Development Department and request removal of this condition. 403 404 ATTACHMENT 1405 406 ATTACHMENT 2 Pavilion Palms Shopping Center Applications Being Considered Specific Plan Amendment The Specific Plan Amendment proposes the following: • Reduce the minimum landscape setback along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 from 20 to 18 feet—a 10% reduction; • Allow retail stores over 50,000 sq. ft. as a permitted use (Pavilions building is proposed at 63,000 sq. ft.); • Allow maximum building height to be 40 feet, per the underlying CC zone, within 150 feet of the Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street rights-of-way; • Allow a fuel center (automobile service station without repair facilities) as a permitted use, in conjunction with an anchor tenant. Should a fuel center be proposed without an anchor tenant, it would be subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP); • Modify the current Master Design Theme from Spanish Mediterranean style to a Contemporary style; and • Remove the sign program under the current Specific Plan to allow future sign programs to be considered without a SPA. Site Development Permit The site plan consists of 13 commercial buildings totaling 121,795 sq. ft. including: • A 63,000 sq. ft. Pavilions grocery store building, with a drive-through pharmacy; • A Pavilions-branded fuel center, with an 825 sq. ft. mini-mart (Building 7); • A retail building approximately 4,400 sq. ft. (Retail 1); • A multi-tenant building (Shops 1) approximately 11,700 sq. ft.; • Five buildings ranging from 2,000 to 5,000 sq. ft. (Buildings 1-5) along the Jefferson Street frontage, with Buildings 3 and 4 as drive-throughs; and • Four buildings ranging from 3,500 to 7,500 sq. ft. along the Avenue 50 frontage. The site plan also includes two plaza areas around the buildings at the corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. Fuel Center Location and Operations There are no new changes to the fuel center’s location and operations. The fuel center location is on the east side towards the middle of the site along Jefferson Street instead of along Avenue 50. The fuel center will include dispensing of motor vehicle fuel, an automobile-related air/water unit, and an 825 sq. ft. mini-mart that will offer the sale of convenience dry goods and general merchandise, lottery tickets, refrigerated dairy/deli products and prepared food and drinks. The sale of beer, wine and alcohol would be prohibited. Hours of operation for the fuel center 407 ATTACHMENT 2 (including the mini mart) will be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Similar to the fuel center hours of operation, deliveries for the entire shopping center will be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. per Mitigation Measure NOI-8 (Exhibit A). Architecture Architectural plans for the Pavilions building and fuel center, Retail 1, Shops 1 and Buildings 3 through 6 are included in this SDP and are representative examples of the proposed architecture of the site. The architectural design of other retail pad buildings, Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10, will require separate SDP approval since they are not included in this package. A condition of approval is imposed that the architectural design of Buildings 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 shall match the architectural design of the currently proposed buildings. Landscaping and Lighting Landscaping for the project includes desert tolerant, water efficient plants and shade trees including to enhance the architectural statement of the shopping center and provide shade. The plans include landscape berms within the landscape setbacks along Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 to improve views into drive-through facilities, the fuel center and parking areas. Additional landscape treatment is proposed along the project’s western wall behind the Pavilions building to screen it from the views of the residences to the west. In response to concerns regarding shading, the applicant revised the landscape plan to add more shade trees in addition to the palms. The shading plan shows 70% shading of the parking lot which exceeds the minimum 50% required by the Code. Regarding vacant pads and maintenance, conditions of approval have been incorporated. SDP Condition #109 requires vacant pads to be fully landscaped prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the Pavilions store. Additionally, to address landscape and property maintenance, the applicant will be required to record maintenance obligations in their CC&R’s, to which the City would be a third- party beneficiary (SDP Conditions #113 and 114), as well as enter into a maintenance agreement with the neighboring HOA’s (Renaissance and Palmilla), to which the City also would be a third-party beneficiary (SDP Condition #115). Parking lot lighting for the project will consist of LED lighting, no taller than 20 feet, which complies with height limits of the CC District. Additionally, the conditions of approval restrict the height of the lights on the back of the Pavilions building to under 20 feet to reduce lighting impacts on the Renaissance neighborhood to the west. Tentative Parcel Map The Tentative Parcel Map proposes to reconfigure the property from 5 parcels into 13 parcels. This change is in response to changes made to the site plan which led to an increase in parcels from the originally proposed 12 parcels to 13 parcels. 408 ATTACHMENT 3 409 410 411 412 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 THROUGH 2025/26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Discuss projects to be included in fiscal years 2021/22 through 2025/26 Capital Improvement Program and provide Staff direction. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five -year plan for major construction projects such as bridges, streets, traffic signals, drainage facilities, landscaping, lighting, parks, and other facilities. •Based upon Council and resident input over the past year, Staff developed a preliminary scope and budget for various projects proposed for the 2021/22 CIP budget. •The Financial Advisory Commission (FAC) established a CIP Budget Committee to participate in the CIP preparation process with St aff. •A draft CIP and the CIP Budget Committee report was considered by the FAC on February 24, 2021. •Council will be requested to appropriate funds for the 2021/22 CIP improvements when the operating budget and final CIP is considered in June 2021. FISCAL IMPACT This review does not generate fiscal impacts. The Landscape and Lighting Median Island Improvements and Citywide Drainage Enhancements would use General Funds. The La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvements, Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation and Fritz Burns Park Improvements Projects would use Measure G funding. Revenue sources are identified in Attachment 1. STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 413 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Staff recommends the following projects be included in the 2021/22 CIP: Transportation Projects Transportation projects are generally funded through the Pavement Management Plan (General Fund), Transportation Development Impact Fees (DIF), Gas Tax, Measure A, SB1, and ATP funds. • 2021/22 Pavement Management Plan (General Fund: $1 .0M) The City of La Quinta’s current proposed Five-Year Pavement Management Plan (PMP) (Attachment 2) spans from 2021 to 2026. The proposed 21/22 projects include Crack sealing, slurry sealing and dig outs on Avenue 52 from Washington Street to Desert Club Drive, Desert Club Drive from Avenue 52 to Calle Tampico, Seasons Way, and within the Desert Pride development; and Crack sealing the east/west street segments within the Cove. • Avenue 53 at Jefferson Street Roundabout (Measure A: $345K, DIF Transportation: $204.5K) This project was approved by Council as part of the 2016/17 CIP. Staff recommends the addition of SB-1 funds and DIF Transportation funds to supplement the existing budget; these funds will be used for the landscape improvements and the construction phase of the project . • Dune Palms Road Pavement Rehabilitation (Measure A: $240K, SB1: $822K) This project includes pavement rehabilitation of Dune Palms Road from Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue. • Citywide Striping Refresh (Measure A: $400K) This project includes a striping refresh of all arterial streets within the City limits. Drainage Improvements • Citywide Drainage Enhancements (General Fund: $477K) This project will upgrade drainage facilities along Calle Tampico from Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street for minimum 150 -year storm protection in accordance with the Focused Drainage Study. 414 Parks and Facilities Projects • La Quinta Landscape Improvements (Measure G: $1.4M) A continuation of the multi-year initiative to refurbish the neighborhood parkways for the communities north of Highway 111. The Year 5 phase will focus on the Cactus Flower parkways per the schedule presented in Attachment 3. • Landscape and Lighting Median Island Improvements (General Fund: $500K) This project entails refurbishing City-owned medians south of Highway 111, prioritized over five years. Staff has developed an implementation strategy that recommends priorities and landscape materials. • Fritz Burns Park Improvements (Measure G: $350K) This project entails space planning and additional park amenity improvements at Fritz Burns Park. • Village Art Plaza, Promenade and Cultural Center (Library Funds: $2.575M, Community Cultural Center DIF: $125K) This project would complete the Village Art Plaza Promenade and Cultural Center and incorporate any current master planning effort into the design and construction. Improvements would include but are not limited to a seating and socializing area, landscape and irrigation, walkways, permanent and temporary art spaces, and shade structures. The Village Art Promenade would be designed in a manner that allows for connectivity to the adjacent Village Art Plaza (prior lumberyard building) and the City Museum. This project would also convert the old Lumber Yard structure and surrounding grounds to a Village Art Plaza and provide connectivity to the Museum and Village Art Promenade Other Adjustments • Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation (Measure G: $1M) Implement the Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan improvements, which may include landscape, connectivity and circulation improvements, entry monuments, wayfinding, catalyst project sites, lighting , and art installations. • Citywide Miscellaneous American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements (CDBG: $128K) This is a continuation of implementing ADA improvements at City parks, buildings, intersection curb ramps and sidewalks based upon the City's ADA Transition Plan Report. 415 Reimbursements for Existing Developer Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreements (Transportation DIF: $400K) The City entered into reimbursement agreements with nine development entities who constructed improvements for the benefit of the City in anticipation of future reimbursement from development impact fees. In 2017 the Council set reimbursement priorities; 9 of 11 developers submitted the required documentation and have been included in the approved repayment plan (Attachment 4). Projects on the Horizon The CIP also identified future year projects; those that may be of interest to the Council entail the following: •Fred Waring Drive Pavement Rehabilitation (Washington Street to Adams Street) (2022/23) •Corporate Yard – Facilities and Administrative Offices (2022/23) •Washington Street Sidewalk Improvements (Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico) (2023/24) •Moon River Drive Pavement Rehabilitation (Ave 50 to DSUSD ROW) (2024/25) Staff and the FAC CIP Budget Committee, including Commissioners Batavick and Hoffner, reviewed the CIP funding, prioritization criteria, and projects. During the FAC study session on February 24, 2021 Staff presented the draft CIP to the FAC, and the Commissioners discussed their review process and findings (Attachment 5). Staff seeks direction on all projects included in the draft CIP. After incorporating Council’s comments, an updated CIP program will be presented for adoption in June. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Project Revenue Summary from Draft 2021/22 through 2025/26 CIP 2.2021 Pavement Management Update - 5 Year Plan 3.La Quinta Landscape Renovation Project Schedule 4.DIF Reimbursement Agreement Repayment Schedule 5. FAC CIP Budget Committee Report 416 Project #Project Description General Fund Operating Measure G Sales Tax SB 1 Road Maint/Rehab DIF Community and Cultural Center DIF Transportation Measure A Other Revenue Other Revenue Source Total 2021/2022 2122ADA ADA Accessible Ramps - Various Locations 20,000 20,000 2122CPM Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 50,000 Equip Replacement Fund 50,000 2122PMP Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 2122STI Sidewalks - Various Locations 55,000 55,000 2122TMI Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 235,000 235,000 2122DRA Citywide Drainage Enhancements 477,000 477,000 201603 La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement 1,408,356 1,408,356 201702 Developer Reimbursement for DIF Eligible Improvements 400,000 400,000 201709 Avenue 53 Jefferson St. Roundabout 204,500 345,500 550,000 201804 Landscape and Lighting Median Island Improvements 500,000 500,000 201901 Village Art Plaza Promenade and Cultural Center 125,000 2,575,000 Library Funds and Cultural Ctr DIF 2,700,000 201905 Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 1,000,000 1,000,000 202101 Dune Palms Road Pavement Rehabilitation (Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue) 822,800 240,000 1,062,800 202102 Fritz Burns Park Improvements 350,000 350,000 202103 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Improvements 128,350 Community Dev Block Grant 128,350 202104 Citywide Striping Refresh 400,000 400,000 FY 2021/2022 SUBTOTAL:2,052,000 2,758,356 822,800 125,000 604,500 1,220,500 2,753,350 10,336,506 2022/2023 2223ADA ADA Accessible Ramps - Various Locations 20,000 20,000 2223CPM Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 50,000 Equip Replacement Fund 50,000 2223PMP Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 2223STI Sidewalks - Various Locations 55,000 55,000 2223TMI Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 235,000 235,000 2223DRA Citywide Drainage Enhancements 477,000 477,000 201702 Developer Reimbursement for DIF Eligible Improvements 400,000 400,000 201804 Landscape and Lighting Median Island Improvements 500,000 500,000 201805 Corporate Yard - Facilities and Administrative Offices 2,773,000 2,773,000 201905 Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 1,000,000 1,000,000 202102 Fritz Burns Park Improvements 2,000,000 2,000,000 202201 Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation (Washington St. to Eisenhower Dr.)1,100,000 1,100,000 202202 City Hall Rehabilitation 100,000 100,000 202203 Fred Waring Drive Pavement Rehabilitation (Washington Street to Adams Street)800,000 520,000 1,320,000 FY 2022/2023 SUBTOTAL:2,152,000 5,773,000 800,000 0 400,000 1,855,000 50,000 11,030,000 2023/2024 2324ADA ADA Accessible Ramps - Various Locations 20,000 20,000 2324CPM Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 50,000 Equip Replacement Fund 50,000 2324PMP Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 2324STI Sidewalks - Various Locations 55,000 55,000 2324TMI Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 235,000 235,000 2324DRA Citywide Drainage Enhancements 477,000 477,000 201702 Developer Reimbursement for DIF Eligible Improvements 400,000 400,000 201804 Landscape and Lighting Median Island Improvements 500,000 500,000 201805 Corporate Yard - Facilities and Administrative Offices 3,657,000 3,657,000 CITY OF LA QUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVENUE SUMMARY ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1417 418 Project #Project Description General Fund Operating Measure G Sales Tax SB 1 Road Maint/Rehab DIF Community and Cultural Center DIF Transportation Measure A Other Revenue Other Revenue Source Total 201905 Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 1,000,000 1,000,000 202202 City Hall Rehabilitation 900,000 900,000 202301 Avenue 58 Pavement Rehabilitation (Jefferson Street to Madison Street)1,380,000 1,380,000 202302 Caleo Bay at Avenue 47 (New Traffic Signal)430,000 430,000 202303 Washington Street at Lake La Quinta Drive (New Traffic Signal)430,000 430,000 202304 Francis Hack Lane Pavement Rehabilitation (Avenida Bermudas to Cul-De-Sac)380,000 380,000 202305 Washington Street Sidewalk Improvements (Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico)478,000 478,000 FY 2023/2024 SUBTOTAL:2,952,000 4,657,000 858,000 0 1,260,000 1,615,000 50,000 11,392,000 2024/2025 2425ADA ADA Accessible Ramps - Various Locations 20,000 20,000 2425CPM Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 50,000 Equip Replacement Fund 50,000 2425PMP Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 2425STI Sidewalks - Various Locations 55,000 55,000 2425TMI Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 235,000 235,000 2425DRA Citywide Drainage Enhancements 477,000 477,000 201702 Developer Reimbursement for DIF Eligible Improvements 400,000 400,000 201804 Landscape and Lighting Median Island Improvements 500,000 500,000 201905 Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 1,000,000 1,000,000 202401 Avenue 50 Sidewalk Improvements (Washington Street to Avenida Montero)400,000 400,000 202402 Moon River Drive Pavement Rehabilitation (Ave 50 to DSUSD ROW)400,000 400,000 202403 Washington Street Sidewalk Improvements (Calle Tampico to Avenue 52)444,000 444,000 202404 Cove Area Slurry Seal Improvements Phase 1 860,000 860,000 FY 2024/2025 SUBTOTAL:2,052,000 1,000,000 860,000 0 400,000 1,479,000 50,000 5,841,000 2025/2026 2526ADA ADA Accessible Ramps - Various Locations 20,000 20,000 2526CPM Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 50,000 Equip Replacement Fund 50,000 2526PMP Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 2526STI Sidewalks - Various Locations 55,000 55,000 2526TMI Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 235,000 235,000 2425DRA Citywide Drainage Enhancements 477,000 477,000 201702 Developer Reimbursement for DIF Eligible Improvements 400,000 400,000 201804 Landscape and Lighting Median Island Improvements 500,000 500,000 201905 Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 1,000,000 1,000,000 202501 Citywide Striping Refresh 400,000 400,000 202502 Highway 111/Simon Drive Dual Left Turn Lanes 723,850 723,850 202503 Cove Area Slurry Seal Improvements Phase 2 850,000 850,000 FY 2025/2026 SUBTOTAL:2,052,000 1,000,000 850,000 0 400,000 1,358,850 50,000 5,710,850 TOTAL FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 THROUGH 2025/26:11,260,000 15,188,356 4,190,800 3,064,500 7,528,350 2,953,350 44,310,356 419 420 SH-111 60TH AVE MONROE ST54TH AVE 50TH AVE 62ND AVE MILES AVE 52ND AVE 48TH AVE FRED WARING DR EISENHOWER DR49TH AVE WASHINGTON STLIGAAVENUE 52 MADISON STCITRUS DUNE PALMS RDAIRPORT BLVD PGA BLVD58TH AVEAVENIDA VALLEJOAVENIDA RUBIOAVENIDA RAMIREZAVENIDA HERRERARI VIE RAJEFFERSON STAVENIDA CARRANZAOAK HILLAVENIDA VILLAADAMS ST61ST AVE AVENUE 58AVENIDA ALVARADOAVENIDA MARTINEZSHIELDS RDWINGED FOOTHERMITAGEAVENIDA NAVARROHJORTH STMERION 51ST AVECALLE TAMPICO MANDARINA WEISKOPF 55TH AVECLINTON STVIA DONAROSS AVEDEL GATO DREL DORADO DRVIA SAVONAWARNER TRLINVERNESSPINA VIA PAESSARO 47TH AVE 46TH AVE OASIS STAVENIDA MADEROPARK AVEELKHORN TRLLIMA VILLAGE DRA V E N ID A M O N T E Z U M A CETRINO SOUTHERN HILLSBONITA TRLA N D A LU SI ACALEO BAYC O A C H ELLA D RAVENIDA F ERN ANDO MISSION DR EQUAI L RUN LNARACENA S P A N I S H B A Y IROQUOIS DR TOM FAZIO LN N RI VIE RA AVETIBURON DR AVENIDA LA FONDASEELEY DRYOUNGS LNVIA CC TROON WAYVIA VALEROSAAVILA DRMI SSI ON DR WTOPAZ DRR O N D AFIRESTONEEMERALD DR U LRIC H DRMOUNTAIN VIEWV ILLA G E C LU B D R VI A DDBURR STSTILLWATER DRVIA SEVILLA CSILLA ST BAFFIN AVEVISTA ESTRELLAPOMELO ST VIA PISAP R IS M D RAVENIDA BERMUDASDESERT CLUB DRCALLE MAZATLAN VI A C ARM E L TORINO DR MUIRFIELD VILLAGE VILLETA DR TORONJA BAYAJASPER PARK AVE TEE ST CEREZATANGLEWOODSANITA DR PARK LNBALBOA PLPALM DRMONTICELLO AVEG A L A X Y D R TIGRIS AVE BELLERIVE POLO RD MARY LN FIESTA DR N U E V O D R SAND DR59TH AVE JASMINE LN V I A MEL OD I A SUNBROOK LN53RD AVEDAKOTA TRLOCOTILLO DRCABRILLO PLALMONTEBIG CANYON STVIA PALACIOJEREZINTERLACHENNATIONAL D R M ANITO U DRYALE STBROWN DEER PARK DULCE DEL MAR AR A P A H O E ROUDEL LNROCK ROSE DRMAGELLAN PLAVERY DR JACK NICKLAUSMARBELLA CTALYSHEBA DRBRADSHAW TRLVIA SORRENTOVIA STRADACALLE NORTE PEAR STGREEN HILLS DR ROYAL BIR KDALE DR VIA ROSAVISTA LAGUNACLARET CVWASHINGTON ST FRONTAGELA QUINTA DRSAGEBRUSH AVE PEERLESS PLPECOS PL CONTENTOSILVER ROCKDIANE DR VIA PORTOFINO TANGELO DRVIA RITA SAGUARO RD ZENDA DR VIA BRAVA R O YA L DO RNO C H DR CEDAR CRESTARDENNAIS DRSTONEGATEBAY CLUB DRAVENIDA OBREGONPINDO DRSANDPIPER DR PEBBLE BEACHQU A R R Y LN SHADOW TRL S VALLEY LNALI CTT U L A R E L N RIO SECOVIA SOLANALAUREL VALLEYAVENIDA ULTIMO NAUTICAL DRST FRANCIS AVESTONEMONT DRV I A D I J ON VIA PALMILLASIERRA VISTA SIENA CT VIDA BELLA DR AMALFI DR VISTA PALOM INOVILLANOVA STV IST A G R A N D E ORCHID CTVIA ENCINITAS CA L LE BR I S A TRIBECCA ST HIGGINS CT VICTORIA LNARCHINE LNC A R B O N E R A SAVENIDA DIAZAVENIDA JUAREZWASHINGTON STMADISON STADAMS STJEFFERSON STMADISON ST51ST AVE ADAMS STMADISON ST55TH AVE 58TH AVEADAMS STAIRPORT BLVD ® Legend La Quinta $1 Million Recommended Streets 2021-22 Crack Sealing 2021-22 2022-23 Crack Sealing 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 City of La Quinta $1 Million Budget Map 2021-26 75 ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 2421 422 423 424 DEVELOPER(RESPONSIVE / CONFIRMED)AGREEMENTDATECIP PROJECT DESCRIPTIONNTE AMOUNT TOTAL POINTSACCRUED FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29ND La Quinta Partners, LLC 4-Dec-07 Avenue 52 - Improved One Lane of Travel & Installed Raised/Landscaped Median 1,344,690$ 1865,455$ 65,455$ 66,536$ 77,563$ 90,000$ 90,000$ 101,106$ 101,408$ 140,021$ 204,400$ 225,000$ 117,747$ East of Madison, LLC 4-Dec-07 Avenue 52 - Improved One Lane of Travel & Installed 1/2 Raised/Landscaped Medi669,920$ 1761,818$ 61,818$ 62,839$ 73,254$ 85,000$ 85,000$ 95,489$ 95,775$ 48,926$ -$ -$ -$ East of Madison, LLC (Part 1) 26-Jan-16 Madison Street - Improved One Lane of Travel & Installed Raised/Landscaped Med976,266$ 1450,909$ 50,909$ 51,750$ 60,327$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 78,638$ 78,873$ 108,905$ 158,978$ 175,000$ 21,976$ Toll Brother's Inc. (Part 1) 6-Feb-08 Avenue 50 - Installed Full Median Curb & Median Island Landscape 179,062$ 1347,273$ 47,273$ 48,054$ 36,463$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ East of Madison, LLC (Part 2) 26-Jan-16 Avenue 54 - Improved One Lane of Travel & Striped 1/2 width Painted Median 524,010$ 1140,000$ 40,000$ 40,661$ 47,400$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 61,787$ 61,972$ 85,568$ 36,622$ -$ -$ ND La Quinta Partners, LLC 26-Jan-16 Madison Street - Improved One Lane of Travel 418,400$ 1140,000$ 40,000$ 40,661$ 47,400$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 61,787$ 61,972$ 16,580$ -$ -$ -$ Lennar Homes of California, Inc6-Jun-11 Fred Waring Drive - Installed full Median Curb & Median Island Landscape 103,083$ 1036,364$ 36,364$ 30,356$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Sam's Real Estate Business Trus10-Oct-12 Dune Palms Road - Installed Full Median Curb & Median Island Landscape228,697$ 932,727$ 32,727$ 33,268$ 38,782$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 1,193$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Toll Brother's Inc. (Part 2) 6-Feb-08 Avenue 52 - Median Island Improvements (Landscape Only)95,596$ 725,455$ 25,455$ 25,875$ 18,812$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,539,723$ 110400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 139,723$ $Denotes the final payment due to the DeveloperDEVELOPER(NON-RESPONSIVE)AGREEMENTDATECIP PROJECT DESCRIPTIONNTE AMOUNT TOTAL POINTSACCRUED Greystone Clubhouse Assoc., LL12-Jun-08 Avenue 52 - Improved One Lane of Travel & Installed Raised/Landscaped Median 463,894$ 15T.D. Desert Development LLP 12-Oct-06 Avenue 50 - Installed 1/2 Median Curb (with Landscape) 186,900$ 10650,794 25CITY OF LA QUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMDEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT REPAYMENT The above listed developers (two total) have not submitted the appropriate invoices or documentation, and are therefore considered as "Non‐Responsive". The repayment plan above does not include the total of the Non‐Responsive Developers ($650,794) in its total ($4,539,723). TOTAL DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT:TOTAL DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT:This repayment plan is applicable to the Developers who have submitted invoices to the City, and the City has reviewed / approved repayment.This method calculates the overall percentage based on the Total Points Accrued, and allows the Developers to receive annual payments accordingly, until the Agreement has been satisfied. The percentage of (Total Points Accrued / Total Points) was determined for each Developer Reimbursement Agreement and multiplied by an annual anticipated payment of $400,000 to determine how much each Developer shall receive each year. In the event that a Developer's Agreement was fulfilled in a year, and there was a remainder of the anticipated $400,000, a new percentage, excluding the points from the previously repaid developer, was calculated and redistributed within that same Fiscal Year. ATTACHMENT 4ATTACHMENT 4 425 426 FAC Commissioner CIP Budget Committee Report Committee Review Process: 1.Held three Committee meetings with Public Works, Finance, Consultant, and Commissioners. 2.Reviewed proposed CIP spending by project for FYs 2021/22 through 2025/26. 3.Reviewed proposed priority rating and sequencing of each project in each fiscal year. 4.Reviewed funding source adequacy of each project in each fiscal year. 5.Reviewed proposed changes to CIP Budget based on project priority ratings, funding source adequacy, and meeting discussions. 6.Made recommendations to continue to strengthen and improve the annual CIP budgeting process. Findings and Conclusions: 1.Total Final CIP Budget spending recommendation for FYs 2021/22 through 2025/26 is $44.3 million, up $3.8 million from the Original CIP Budget (as presented in Attachment 5 to the Staff Report). The majority of this increase is made up of new additions for Fritz Burns Park Improvements, Washington Street Sidewalk Improvements, Pavement Rehab Projects, and Cove Area Slurry Seal Improvements. 2.The CIP project priority rating and sequencing methodology and outcomes are reasonable. 3.The amounts budgeted for each project are reasonable in relation to past standards and practices and factors known today. It is understood that final amounts will change and spending decisions on each project will be re- evaluated prior to engagement to reflect most current City needs and to ensure that such spending will deliver best possible cost/benefit outcomes. 4.The CIP budget funding sources and reserves are adequate and reasonable to cover the proposed CIP spending recommendations with minimal risk to impacts on the City’s normal operations. 5.Therefore, the $44.3 million CIP Budget proposed for FYs 2021/22 through 2025/26 is deemed to be reasonable. ATTACHMENT 5 427 6. The FAC Commissioners appreciate and compliment Staff for all of the diligence, support, and leadership exhibited throughout this CIP budgeting process. Recommendations: 1. That the FAC recommends to the City Council the approval of this proposed $44.3 million CIP Budget for FYs 2021/22-2025/26 as presented by the CIP Budget Committee. 2. That Staff continues to provide a Final CIP Budget Comparison Schedule (Attachment 5) showing all changes made to the Original CIP Budget to ensure there is a clear audit trail of any revisions to project spending, project prioritization, project sequencing, and project funding sources as the CIP Budget Committee moves through the CIP budgeting process. 3. That Finance and/or City Manager provide to the CIP Budget Committee, at the beginning of the annual CIP Budget process, some general written guidelines on the total amount of CIP spending which can be “afforded” per fiscal year, based on some assessment of expected annual City cash flows, reserves levels, revenue sources, and CIP carryover. The CIP Budget Committee can then work within those guidelines to ensure that total proposed annual CIP spending will fit within them and can be allocated to those projects which will deliver highest and best utilization to the City. 428 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 NOVEMBER 24, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2020 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chairperson Proctor. This meeting was held by teleconference pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N- 29-20, N-33-20, and N-35-20, executed by the Governor of California in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Commissioners Bettencourt, Caldwell, Currie, Libolt Varner, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor ABSENT: Commissioner McCune STAFF PRESENT: Design & Development Director Danny Castro, Planning Manager Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner Carlos Flores, Commission Secretary Sijifredo Fernandez PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Libolt Varner led the Planning Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA There were no requests to speak under the Public Comment on Matters Not on the Agenda’ section of the meeting and staff continued to monitor emails should written comments or requests for verbal comments be received. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Commission concurred and the agenda was confirmed. Commissioner Libolt Varner said she would recuse herself from discussion and vote on Business Session No. 2 and Public Hearing No. 1 due to a potential conflict of interest stemming from a business relationship with her previous employer, MSA Consulting. 429 REPORTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 28 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 NOVEMBER 24, 2020 ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION- NONE CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DATED OCTOBER 27, 2020 Commissioner Bettencourt shared his disappointment of staff not providing additional details on the minutes regarding the Wave project considering the magnitude of the project. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Caldwell/Libolt Varner to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted. AYES: Commissioners Bettencourt, Caldwell, Currie, Libolt Varner, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner McCune. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed unanimously. DECLARATIONS REGARDING COMMISSION PUBLIC CONTACTS – No public contact to report. BUSINESS SESSION- NONE 1. APPROVE CANCELLATION OF REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 22, 2020 AND JANUARY 12, 2021 Planning Manager Cheri L. Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development Department. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Caldwell/Nieto to approve the cancellation of regular planning commission meeting of December 22, 2020 and January 12, 2021. AYES: Commissioners Bettencourt, Caldwell, Currie, Libolt Varner, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner McCune. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed unanimously. 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ADD A PROVISION TO SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0002 TO ALLOW FOR TALLER BUILDING HEIGHT ALONG IMAGE CORRIDORS FOR THE PAVILION PALMS SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT; CEQA: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 50 AND JEFFERSON STREET Planning Manager Cheri L. Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Staff responded to Commission inquiries and comments regarding: The scope of what is being recommend by this resolution. 430 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 NOVEMBER 24, 2020 The impacts of the change in language will have other buildings on site. If it would be possible for the applicant to provide a line of sight exhibit from Pamilla to determine the visual impact of the additional height. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mr. Philip Spencer, La Quinta – shared his concern about the increase in height to the buildings blocking the visibility to the Pavilion Store. Mr. Spencer questioned why the developer is looking to make changes to the Specific Plan this late in the project. He mentioned La Quinta is a destination location and this was a miss use of a prominent corner. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Ms. Leila Namvar, La Quinta - shared her concern with the revision to height of the buildings in the corner, Ms. Namvar stated this revision does not match the purpose and intent of human scale architecture. She had concerns with the parking and drive-through stacking along building one. Ms. Namvar also questioned whether the gas station had been removed from the project. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mr. Greg Bever, applicant, Lundin Development Company Rancho Mirage – introduced himself and introduced the Project architect Jeff Herbst of MCG Architecture. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mr. Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture – addressed questions and concerns regarding visibility of the slanted roof and material, which is a white TPO application (thermoplastic roof). He stated that no mechanical equipment shall be placed on top of the slanted roof section. The proposed glass material is a spandrel glass application and allows for creative color applications and the spandrel glass allows for the reduction in heat. Commissioner Currie shared her concerns about the space in between the two buildings appears to be more of an alley way rather than a plaza, the architectural design is inconsistent with the general area and the increase in height is not in keeping with the image corridor. Chairperson Proctor stated that the proposed scale and volume of these corner buildings are overwhelming and are out of proportion and that this corner was meant to be meant to be iconic, but these buildings will be iconic for the wrong reasons. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Bettencourt/Caldwell to adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council to add a provision to the Specific Plan 2017-0002 to allow for taller building height along image corridors for the pavilion palms shopping center project. AYES: Commissioners Bettencourt and Caldwell. NOES: Commissioners Currie, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor. ABSENT: Commissioners Libolt Varner and McCune. ABSTAIN: None. Motion did not pass. STUDY SESSION- NONE 431 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 NOVEMBER 24, 2020 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2020-0006 (SDP 2013-924, AMENDMENT 1) TO AMEND SIGNATURE AT PGA WEST SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANS CEQA: THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT COMPLETED FOR EDEN ROCK AT PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN. LOCATION: WITHIN THE PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. Senior Planner Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Staff responded to Commission questions regarding the cause of this application not being a staff level decision, that it exceeded the thresholds of being conducted at a staff level; clarified how units can be plotted in the development; clarified that development standards aren’t changing. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mr. Todd Cunningham, applicant – addressed questions regarding changes to the project PUBLIC SPEAKER: Ms. Jennifer Jenkins, PGA West HOA Representative – spoke in support of the project PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mr. Domenic Provenzano, PGA West – spoke in support of the project PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mr. Ben Dobbs, PGA West Representative – was unable to be reached by staff but Mr. Dobbs was in support of the project MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Bettencourt/Caldwell to adopt Planning Commission Resolution approving Site Development Permit 2020-0006 and determine that the project is consistent with previously certified subsequent environmental impact report California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. AYES: Commissioners Bettencourt, Caldwell Currie, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Libolt Varner and McCune. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed unanimously. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - NONE COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS Commissioner Bettencourt requested staff to provide a status update regarding the adjacent Vista Santa Rosa and Bermuda Dunes communities. He also requested information on a proposed project in Vista Santa Rosa and, if possible, to invite the 432 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5 NOVEMBER 24, 2020 chair of the local agency formation commission to speak about their work. Staff will return with information regarding the community meetings on a future agenda. STAFF ITEMS – NONE ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Caldwell/Nieto to adjourn at 6:25 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, SIJIFREDO FERNANDEZ, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California 433 434 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 DECEMBER 8, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, DECEMBER 08, 2020 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 5:04 p.m. by Chairperson Proctor. This meeting was held by teleconference pursuant to Executive Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, N-33-20, and N-35-20, executed by the Governor of California in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Commissioners Bettencourt, Caldwell, Currie, Libolt Varner, McCune, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Design & Development Director Danny Castro, Planning Manager Cheri Flores, Senior Planner Carlos Flores, Commission Secretary Sijifredo Fernandez, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Caldwell led the Planning Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY: Kay Wolff, La Quinta – Ms. Wolff provided public comment in regards to zoning as it relates to short-term vacation rentals and expressed concerns regarding quality of life affected by the density of vacation rentals. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Caldwell/Bettencourt to confirm the Agenda as posted. Motion passed unanimously. DECLARATIONS REGARDING COMMISSION PUBLIC CONTACTS – Commissioner Libolt Varner stated that she would need to recuse herself from discussion and vote on Study Session Item No. 1 due to potential conflict of interest stemming 435 REPORTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 29 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 DECEMBER 8, 2020 from her current employment with Lift to Rise and it’s relation to the Housing Element Update as well as Public Hearing Item No. 1 due to a business relationship with her previous employer, MSA Consulting. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION-NONE CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DATED NOVEMBER 24, 2020 Commissioner Caldwell requested additional comments be added to the minutes regarding the Pavilion Palms item due to the complexity and nature of this project. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Caldwell/Nieto to continue this item to the next regular Planning Commission meeting to allow staff to review and provide additional comments made by Commissioners regarding Business Session Item No. 1 Pavilion Palms project. Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION - NONE STUDY SESSION 1. UPDATE ON PREPARATION OF THE 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE OCTOBER 2021-OCTOBER 2029 PLANNING PERIOD Commissioner Libolt Varner left the meeting due to previously stated potential conflict of interest stemming from her current employment with Lift to Rise. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste gave a verbal update and visual presentation on the Housing Element including background, accomplishments of the last reporting period, and RHNA allocations; and answered questions regarding the possible repercussions of not meeting affordable housing requirements. 2. DISCUSS THE CITY’S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE INCLUDING STATUS OF THE VISTA SANTA ROSA GATEWAY VILLAGE PROJECT IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND WITHIN CITY’S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE Chair Proctor clarified that the Planning Commission does not have decision making powers regarding the projects being discussed which was confirmed by staff. Planning Manager Flores reminded the Planning Commission that this item was for informational purposes only and that no decisions would be made in regards to this item during this meeting. 436 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 DECEMBER 8, 2020 Planning Manager Cheri Flores and Senior Planner Carlos Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development department. Chair Proctor was found to be absent from the meeting following presentation of the staff report at 5:59 p.m. due to technical difficulties. Vice Chair Nieto stepped in to preside over the meeting until which time Chair Proctor could be reconnected. Staff answered Planning Commission questions regarding the rights of the City in regards to the sphere of influence; CEQA review period and declaration; traffic analysis; pre-zoning of the area and its consistency with general plan uses; and upcoming County meeting schedule for this item; design of the proposed gas station within the project. The Commission stressed importance of the City and the public remaining involved in the future planning of this project due to proximity to La Quinta Communities. The Commission thanked staff for the update on this project. Commissioner Currie was found to be absent at 6:05 p.m. due to technical difficulties. PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY: Lori Davis, La Quinta - Donated time allotment to Public Speaker, Jodi Shapiro PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY: Michael Klein, La Quinta – Donated time allotment to Public Speaker, Jodi Shapiro PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY: Richard Mills, La Quinta – Donated time allotment to Public Speaker, Jodi Shapiro PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY: Valerie Murphy, La Quinta – Donated time allotment to Public Speaker, Jodi Shapiro PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELEPHONIC ACCESSIBILITY: Jodi Shapiro, La Quinta expressed concerns over the scale and size of this commercial project; types of businesses proposed within the project including 24-hour markets that might affect the surrounding 11 communities; commercial properties that remain empty close in proximity to this proposed development. Mr. Shapiro requests additional support from the City in opposing this development. Commissioner Currie rejoined at 6:10 p.m. Chair Proctor returned at 6:18 p.m. and resumed his duties as presiding officer. 437 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 DECEMBER 8, 2020 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2020-0005 (TTM 37930) FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES FOR PENDRY RESIDENCES PROJECT. CEQA: FINDINGS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-1003 APPLY AND NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED. LOCATION: WITHIN THE MIDDLE PORTION OF THE SILVERROCK RESORT, BOUNDED BY SILVERROCK WAY Commissioner Libolt Varner left the meeting due to previously stated potential conflict of interest stemming from her previous employment with MSA Consulting. Senior Planner Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Staff responded to Commission questions regarding clarification of what the recommended action would be approving. CHAIR PROCTOR DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 6:24 p.m. PUBLIC SPEAKERS: None Applicant, John Gamlin, responded to Commission questions regarding site work planned for this site prior to construction; and residential components planned prior to hotels. CHAIR PROCTOR DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 6:27 p.m. Staff responded to additional questions regarding approval of Architectural Site Plan. CHAIR PROCTOR DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING RE-OPENED AT 6:29 p.m. TO ALLOW APPLICANT TO GIVE A PRESENTATION Applicant gave a visual presentation highlighting site plan, building options, layouts and amenities. CHAIR PROCTOR DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 6:38 p.m. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Bettencourt/Nieto to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-010 approving Tentative Tract Map 2020-0005 (TTM 37930) for condominium purposes for Pendry Residences; CEQA findings of Environment Assessment 2014-1003 apply and no further environment review is required; Location within the middle portion of the SilverRock Resort, bounded by SilverRock Way. 438 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5 DECEMBER 8, 2020 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37930 (TTM 2020-0005) FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES FOR PENDRY RESIDENTIAL CASE NUMBERS: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37930 (TTM 2020-0005) APPLICANT: SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AYES: Commissioners Bettencourt, Caldwell, Currie, McCune, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Libolt Varner ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed unanimously. 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND SEVERAL SECTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE; CEQA: EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B)(3) REVIEW FOR EXEMPTIONS – COMMON SENSE RULE; LOCATION: CITYWIDE The Planning Commission took a short recess at 6:41 p.m. to await Commissioner Libolt Varner’s return to the meeting. Meeting resumed at 6:49 p.m. Senior Planner Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Staff responded to Commission questions regarding restrictive convenant provisions; revision of image corridor building standards and use permits required to adjust permitted heights; and thresholds for staff level decisions regarding height adjustments, Commissioner Currie voiced her concern regarding the impacts to the city’s image corridors and stated the goals of the general plan are to protect our scenic mountain vistas. CHAIR PROCTOR DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:16 p.m. PUBLIC SPEAKER: None CHAIR PROCTOR DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:16 p.m. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners McCune/Bettencourt to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-011 recommending to the City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2020-0001 amending sections of Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and finding the action exempt from environmental review under the California 439 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6 DECEMBER 8, 2020 Environmental Quality Act pursuant to 15061(B)(3), Review for Exemptions – Common Sense Rule. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND SEVERAL SECTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO STREAMLINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES AND STANDARDS CASE NUMBER: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2020-0001 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA AYES: Commissioners Bettencourt, Caldwell, Libolt Varner, McCune, Nieto, and Chairperson Proctor. NOES: Commissioner Currie. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - NONE COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS - NONE STAFF ITEMS – NONE ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Caldwell/Nieto to adjourn at 7:20 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, TANIA FLORES, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California 440 POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 2, 2021 3/02/2021 1 City Council March 2, 2021 City Council March 2, 2021 Closed Session In Progress 1 2 3/02/2021 2 Pledge of Allegiance City Council Meeting March 2, 2021 B1 – CONTINUED from February 16, 2021 - Public Safety Camera System (PSCS) Policies and Procedures & Ordinance 3 4 3/02/2021 3 Background •September 2016 ‐Council established an Ad Hoc Committee •The past four years, the Committee has: –Hosted 28 community meetings, 2 focus groups, 2 community surveys –Conducted a 90‐day pilot program, –Presented 10 separate times to Council, –Hired a firm to design a city‐wide system, –Funded program as part of 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program •As part of the PSCS, Council directed staff to create policies and procedures to govern system and incorporate public input Progress •January 15, 2019 –First draft presented to Council, reviewed by City’s insurance carrier and City Attorney •June 18, 2019 –Staff held 22 community meetings during the 90‐Day Pilot Program •December 3, 2019 –Second draft presented to Council based on public comment and reviewed by City Attorney •September 15, 2020 – Policies and Procedures provided to Council as part of the PSCS Update •February 16, 2021 –Third version of the Policies and Procedures were presented to Council ‐additional changes requested and item continued 5 6 3/02/2021 4 Modifications Requested •Establish the use of the Policies and Procedures as Operational Procedures. •If property of a neighboring city or unincorporated area of the county is in alignment with the PSCS’s line of sight, black‐out technology will be applied, unless the neighboring jurisdiction agrees to allow use of the cameras on their property. •Require a 4/5th majority vote by City Council to add any new or additional technology or equipment to the PSCS by adding chapter 11.100 to LQMC. •Expand the definition of “evidentiary purposes” or “for evidence” to include: in response to a warrant, subpoena, or a court order. Safeguards and Protections •Specific policies to: –Protect First and Fourth Amendment rights –Prohibits use of PSCS to target/observe individuals based solely on their race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability or other classifications protected by law –Black‐out technology will be applied to conceal private property –Adds a requirement of 4/5ths Council majority to approve any new or additional public safety technology or new equipment by adding Chapter 11.100 of the Municipal Code related to the public safety camera system policy 7 8 3/02/2021 5 Recommendations •Move to take up Ordinance No. ___ by title and number only and waive further reading. •Move to introduce at first reading, Ordinance No. ____to add chapter 11.100 of the Municipal Code related to a policy with operational procedures for a public safety camera system. •Approve policies and procedures for a public safety camera system in La Quinta 9 10 3/02/2021 6 City Council Meeting March 2, 2021 B2 – CONTINUED from February 25, 2021 INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS Background •Continued from February 25, 2021 •Extensive review of Short-Term Vacation Rental(STVR) Program •Code amendments relating to STVR permitting and operational standards 11 12 3/02/2021 7 Title 3: Chapter 3.25 Code Amendments Homeshare STVR Permit Owner hosts visitors in the owner’s home, while the owner lives on- site and is in the home throughout the visitor’s stay. Primary Residence STVR Permit Owner’s primary residence; owner spends the majority of calendar year on the property used as an STVR; identified as primary residence in RivCo Assessor’s records. General STVR Permit Owner’s second home or investment property used as an STVR. Title 3: Chapter 3.25 Code Amendments Estate Home (5+ bedrooms or more) •Subtype of Homeshare, Primary, or General STVR Permit •Defined as a single-family detached residence with 5+ bedrooms •Must meet evaluation criteria •Inspection required •Installation of noise monitoring devices required 13 14 3/02/2021 8 Title 3: Chapter 3.25 Code Amendments Two-strikes policy •Minor violation reprieve request for relief from strike: 1. Minor debris or trash 2. Permit number or bedroom count not posted 3. Permit number or bedroom count posted in wrong location 4. Overoccupancy due to a minor child not associated with a disturbance. Other Standards Contract agreement between owner and renter acknowledging City’s STVR regulations •Permitting process •Update good neighbor brochure, and other literature. 15 16 3/02/2021 9 City Council Meeting March 2, 2021 PH1 – Fee Update 17 18 3/02/2021 10 User and Regulatory Fees 19 Short-Term Vacation Rental Permit Fees •On recurring basis, staff reviews existing user fees and rates as a basis for recovering allowable costs of certain City services •Due to recent revisions to STVR Program rules and permit types, the City has updated cost of permitting and regulation of STVRs and updated fee schedule for Council consideration Background 19 20 3/02/2021 11 Proposed STVR Fees Current & Proposed STVR Fees 21 22 3/02/2021 12 STVR Fee Comparison Agency Permit Fee Indian Wells $159 (Current) ‐ La Quinta $200 Desert Hot Springs $230 Palm Springs ‐ Homeshare $236 (Proposed) La Quinta ‐ Homeshare STVR Permit (Less than 5 Bedrooms) $250 (Proposed) La Quinta ‐ Homeshare STVR Permit (5 Bedrooms or More) $500 (Proposed) La Quinta ‐ Primary Residence STVR Permit (Less than 5 Bedrooms) $750 (Proposed) La Quinta ‐ Primary Residence STVR Permit (5 Bedrooms or More) $1,250 Palm Springs $944 (Proposed) General La Quinta ‐ STVR (Less than 5 Bedrooms) $1,000 (Proposed) General La Quinta ‐ STVR (5 Bedrooms or More) $1,750 Rancho Mirage $1,700 Cathedral City $1,950 Effective Date If adopted, updated fees will go into effect May 1, 2021 23 24 3/02/2021 13 City Council Meeting March 2, 2021 PH2 – Pavilion Palms Shopping Center 25 26 3/02/2021 14 Vicinity Map Recap •December 15 Council meeting –Remand to PC to consider a modified design focusing on Jefferson and Ave 50 corner •Review height restrictions in relation to the image corridor •Design elements of Buildings 5 and 6 •Incorporating pedestrian-friendly access into the shopping center •Design corner as an entrance into La Quinta 27 28 3/02/2021 15 Revised Design •Revised design concept presented at Jan 26 & Feb 17 PC –Date Grove –Brise Soleil –Exterior Plaza •PC recommended approval of this design 29 30 3/02/2021 16 31 32 3/02/2021 17 33 34 3/02/2021 18 35 36 3/02/2021 19 37 38 3/02/2021 20 PAVILIONS 39 40 3/02/2021 21 PAVILIONS BLDG 7 – FUEL STATION BUILDING 41 42 3/02/2021 22 BLDG 7 – FUEL STATION CANOPY 43 44 3/02/2021 23 SHOPS 1 BLDG 3 45 46 3/02/2021 24 BLDG 4 RETAIL 1 47 48 3/02/2021 25 City Council Meeting March 2, 2021 S1 – 2021/22 through 2025/26 Capital Improvement Program 49 50 3/02/2021 26 Purpose and Timeline •Review CIP – 5-year plan •Finance Advisory Commission –Reviewed February 24, 2021 •City Council –Study Session –SB1 RMRA and Measure A Approval on April 6 –Public Hearing in June –Appropriate first year funds with City Budget FAC CIP Budget Committee •Commissioners Batavick and Hoffner •Committee Reviewed: –CIP process –Funding –Prioritization criteria –Proposed Projects •Commissioners Report: –Committee and Staff Recommend CIP Budget of $44.3M for FYs 2021/22 through 2025/26 51 52 3/02/2021 27 FY 2021/2022 Projects •Transportation Projects •Drainage Projects •Landscape Renovation Projects •Parks and Facilities Projects •Other CIP Projects •DIF Reimbursements Transportation Projects •2021/22 PMP –First year of proposed 5-Year PMP –Crack Fill and Slurry Seal and Dig Outs: •Avenue 52 from Washington Street to Desert Club Drive, •Desert Club Drive from Avenue 52 to Calle Tampico, •Seasons Way, •Within the Desert Pride development –Crack sealing the east/west street segments within the Cove 53 54 3/02/2021 28 Pavement Management Plan •$1.5M/year PMP funding –Maintains 82-84 PCI Rating •$2M/year PMP funding –Maintains 84-86 PCI Rating Transportation Projects •Avenue 53 at Jefferson Street Roundabout –Roundabout at Jefferson Street and Avenue 53 –Road diet on Jefferson Street from Ave 52 to Ave 54 - buffered bicycle and golf cart lane •Dune Palms Pavement Rehabilitation –Miles Avenue to Fred Waring Drive •Citywide Striping Refresh –Striping refresh of all arterial streets within City limits 55 56 3/02/2021 29 Drainage Improvements •Citywide Enhancements –Calle Tampico from Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street and Dune Palms Road –Minimum 150-year storm protection Landscape Renovation Projects •Landscape & Lighting Median Island Improvements –Refurbish southern medians –Utilizing current landscape contractor and staff –Currently completing Eisenhower Drive •La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvements –Renovate northern parkway over 5 years –Desert efficient landscape palette –Final funding allocation for Cactus Flower parkways 57 58 3/02/2021 30 5 Year Landscape Renovation Plan Landscape Renovation Projects 59 60 3/02/2021 31 Parks and Facilities Projects •Fritz Burns Park Improvements –Space planning and additional park amenity improvements •Village Art Plaza, Promenade and Cultural Center –Master planning effort underway –Village Art Promenade improvements include: •Seating and socializing area, landscape and irrigation, walkways, permanent and temporary art spaces, and shade structures. –Connectivity between Village Art Plaza and the City Museum –Convert Lumber Yard structure and surrounding grounds to a Village Art Plaza Other CIP Projects •Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation –Form Based Code assessment underway –PS&E for demonstration projects and ATP Grant application –Banking construction funding for demonstration project •Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Improvements 61 62 3/02/2021 32 DIF Reimbursements •Pay down existing obligations –In lieu of approving new Transportation DIF Projects –$400,000 per year –Anticipated completion: 2028/29 Projects on the Horizon •Fred Waring Drive Pavement Rehabilitation (2022/23) –Washington Street to Adams Street) •Corporate Yard Administrative Offices and Crew Quarters (2022/23) •Washington Street Sidewalk Improvements (2023/24) –Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico •Moon River Drive Pavement Rehabilitation (2024/25) –Avenue 50 to DSUSD Right of Way 63 64 3/02/2021 33 Developer Reimbursement 3.87% Drainage Improvement 4.61% Landscape & Lighting… Public Facility 26.60% Street Improvement 29.15% Street Improvement Pedestrian 11.64% Street Improvement Traffic Signal 2.27% Park Improvements 3.39% FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY $10,336,506 Developer Reimbursement $400,000 Drainage Improvement $477,000 Landscape & Lighting $1,908,356 Public Facility $2,750,000 Street Improvement $3,012,800 Street Improvement Pedestrian $1,203,350 Street Improvement Traffic Signal $235,000 Parks $350,000 65 66 3/02/2021 34 2021/22 CIP •Seek Council direction •CIP adopted in June •Appropriate first year funds with City Budget •QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION 67 68 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 2, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY ANONYMOUS CITIZEN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY ANONYMOUS CITIZEN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY ANONYMOUS CITIZEN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY ANONYMOUS CITIZEN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY ANONYMOUS CITIZEN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY ANONYMOUS CITIZEN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 - PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY COMMENTS 1 From: Sent:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:15 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:"Telephonic Verbal Comments" Attachments:Policy changes.pdf EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Timothy Paul La Quinta Public Comment Not on Agenda, AND Business Session 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT TIMOTHY PAUL BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY COMMENTS February 22, 2021 At the February 16th regularly held Council Meeting, the Council informed me that I may re-submit my recommendations to the City Manager. Five of these suggestions were submitted to staff in the spring of 2019, however the changes I submitted were either lost or misplaced. Attached are the recommended policy changes. Below is a summary of the proposals for your quick reference. They are in order of what I believe to be the priorities. 1.Integration with other Technology pg. 3 – Explicitly restrict this policy from allowing the use of: facial recognition, vocal recognition, gait recognition, or any other biometric tool that could be used to identify people en masse. License plate recognition should also be specifically restricted. Only a ballot measure should be able to add these features. 2.Operational Guidelines pg. 1 – This policy needs to make it very clear that this centralized mass surveillance system is limited to the City of La Quinta, and that it will NOT be merged or joined together with other cities. There is talk about a tri-city alliance with Indian Wells and Palm Desert to help address rising police costs, and I am fearful that this City-wide surveillance system could grow beyond its original intention. 3.Specific Policies pg. 2 clause F – Change “residential” to “private”. Should read “When private property is clearly and knowingly in alignment…” There are numerous private business that work in sensitive fields, and it would be inappropriate for the City to surveil establishments such as: churches, doctors’ offices, legal offices, or counseling centers to name a few. 4.Placement and Monitoring pg. 1 – Enumerate the appropriate locations and restrict it to those specific places, until Council or voter approval is given. The approval of this policy must not be used to justify more and more cameras throughout the City. 5.Camera Notification and Public Outreach pg. 3 – Change “various” to “all”. Should read “Signs will be placed at all locations notifying the public…” The claim of crime deterrence is being used to justify this surveillance system, therefore we should be making everyone readily aware that they are being filmed. 6.Operational Guidelines pg. 1 – Change “City staff” to “trained and authorized City staff”. Should read “The La Quinta Police, La Quinta Fire, and trained and authorized City staff…” After further studying this policy, I have some additional suggestions to make. Below are some bullet points that this policy should also address. They are in no particular order. The policy should acknowledge that privacy still exists in public areas. The policy needs to add language about warrants. The policy needs to address the real possibility of hacking. The policy should restrict filming of screens showing surveillance footage. Consider utilizing a camera to film anyone viewing such surveillance footage. The policy needs to address various conflicting statements. (listed on attached notes) Lastly, the policy must also address and restrict vendors who utilize foreign (notably Chinese) made and/or owned surveillance equipment, software, hardware etc. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT TIMOTHY PAUL BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM POLICY COMMENTS 1 From:Laura Reyes Sent:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:11 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments for City Council Meeting on 03/02/2021 EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Agenda Item: Request for public comment, STVR Restrictions Name: Laura Reyes Phone Number: City: La Quinta First of all I would like to commend the council for the progress they have made in addressing STVRs. We are all seeing the progress made with enforcement, compliance, continued progress of getting rid of non permitted STVRs. etc. It appears that we are getting more people involved willing to work solutions . Let all the work you have done continue to work. Let’s see some metrics before implementing new ones. An STVR is an STVR… why create more work for your staff by having different types with different fee/permit structure? It was stated in the last meeting that 96% of all STVRs in La Quinta are owned by one owner and only 73 STVRs are 5 bedrooms. Never heard of “ homesharing” or the “primary” category till the last meeting. Is a 5 bedroom STVR expected to be different than all others? Is ‘homesharing” and “primary” have different expectations too? The fee should be the same for all whether homesharing, primary residence or 5 bedroom. What is being accomplished by fee/permits differential? Expectations for any renter should be the same. Code compliance is the same for all. The proposed fee increase should be less and the same for all. Although we do not need to know who the habitual complainers are and who are the habitual bad STVRs, the council does. We need to gather these metrics so as when permits are renewed/ reviewed, they are taken into account. We should continue to work at getting rid of all mismanaged STVRs and be transparent about it. We cannot continue to to paint all STVRs with the same broad brush. Through all our joint efforts , we will improve the quality of the management of STVRs so that the moritorium can be lifted eventually. Thanks for listening to me. I have a doctors appointment at the same time of this meeting so that’s why its written. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT LAURA REYES BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 & PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 COMMENTS ON STVR PERMIT TYPES AND FEES 1 From:Edward Armendarez Sent:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:00 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Comments (w/pdf) Request to be read EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. This includes a pdf if you need it: Please include these written comments in the package for today’s City Council Meeting of 3/2/21. I am also requesting that these comments be read during the comments section of the meeting regarding STVR Ordinances. Thank you very much, Edward Armendarez March 2, 2021 Re: STVR Ordinances Dear Madam Mayor, Councilmembers and Manager McMillen, Just a couple of weeks ago you all welcomed the La Quinta Chair of the Financial Advisory Commission, Dick Mills, to speak with you. The esteemed Chairperson, whom you appointed, spoke soberly and sincerely, and said, and I quote: “The TOT revenue is important to the city, however, even if the impact of these rules and regulations cause that revenue to decline, so be it. We will find another way to move forward. Personally I would be delighted that if the basis of your decisions are to simply maintain our quality of life without respect to the financial consequences.” This person is familiar with the financial management of La Quinta and obviously has this City’s best interests at heart. We have been well managed and can withstand the temporary loss of some STVR TOT until additional Tourist Residential units take the place of those operating in residential neighborhoods they were not intended for. Thank you for considering a permanent moratorium on STVR permits. Edward Armendarez La Quinta Cove Please include these written comments in the package for today’s City Council Meeting of 3/2/21. I am also requesting that these comments be read during the comments section of the meeting regarding STVR Ordinances. Thank you very much, Edward Armendarez March 2, 2021 Re: STVR Ordinances Dear Madam Mayor, Councilmembers and Manager McMillen, Just a couple of weeks ago you all welcomed the La Quinta Chair of the Financial Advisory Commission, Dick Mills, to speak with you. The esteemed Chairperson, whom you appointed, spoke soberly and sincerely, and said, and I quote: “The TOT revenue is important to the city, however, even if the impact of these rules and regulations cause CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT EDWARD ARMENDAREZ BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 2 that revenue to decline, so be it. We will find another way to move forward. Personally I would be delighted that if the basis of your decisions are to simply maintain our quality of life without respect to the financial consequences.” This person is familiar with the financial management of La Quinta and obviously has this City’s best interests at heart. We have been well managed and can withstand the temporary loss of some STVR TOT until additional Tourist Residential units take the place of those operating in residential neighborhoods they were not intended for. Thank you for considering a permanent moratorium on STVR permits. Edward Armendarez La Quinta Cove CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT EDWARD ARMENDAREZ BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From: Tim Bendokas Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:04 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Subject: STVR's Importance: High EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Please see attached. Thank you, Tim Bendokas CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS TIM & HEIDI BENDOKAS BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN SUPPORT OF STVRS 1 From:Marcia Cutchin Sent:Monday, March 1, 2021 5:51 PM To:Monika Radeva; City Clerk Mail Subject:Re: Written Comments Attachments:CouncilLtr3221.docx EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hi Monika, Please include the attached document as written comments to the city council meeting on Tuesday, March 2nd. Thank you, Marcia L Cutchin 1)Marcia L Cutchin 2) La Quinta 3) 4) Public Comment or Agenda Item Number 5) STVRs 6) Written Comments CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARCIA CUTCHIN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS Specific Ordinance Regulations Home Occupation License STVR License Visitors allowed to the property from the business activity ABSOLUTELY NONE UP TO 16 Customer and ancillary traffic allowed to the property from the business activity ABSOLUTELY NONE UNLIMITED Amount of the property allowed to be dedicated to the business 25% 100% Number of employees allowed to traffic the property SOLE PROPRIETOR ONLY UNLIMITED Additional noise allowed to be generated by the business NONE 14 HOURS A DAY CACAPHONY GENERATED VIA TRIPLE THE AVERAGE LOCAL OCCUPANCY Property inspection required YES In specific instances only This is not comparing apples and oranges – it is comparing kittens and a stampede of elephants. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARCIA CUTCHIN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS Comparing Bed and Breakfast licensing to STVR licensing: Ordinances 5.88 Bed and Breakfasts and ordinance 3.25 STVRs Bed and Breakfast License STVR License On property oversite supervisor required YES NO Parking on property required YES NO Limiting 2 to a bedroom YES NO Prevention of saturation density limits established YES NO Opportunity for prevention of saturation limits built into the ordinance YES YES Prevention of saturation limits exercised YES NO Why is this? It is unprecedented and illogical to grant unlimited licensing of incompatible and unsupervised businesses in our bedroom communities. Council would never authorize licensing four gas stations in a row – in commercial zones where they belong. Council would never authorize licensing four liquor stores on corners facing each other in commercial zones where they belong. Yet, STVRs in all of the instances above are granted unfettered growth in bedroom communities that are not zoned for business traffic and worse – unsupervised business traffic. Thank you for your continued review of this very skewed and irregular licensing. Sincerely, Marcia L Cutchin 9.30.40 Cove Residential District. Purpose. To provide for the development and preservation of the medium density “cove” residential area with one‐story single‐family detached dwellings on medium size lots, except as provided in Section 9.40.020, “Conditions for varying residential densities.” CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARCIA CUTCHIN BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From:James Gallagher Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 11:53 AM To:City Clerk Mail; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Steve Sanchez; Robert Radi; Linda Evans; Kevin Meredith; Jon McMillen; Monika Radeva Cc:James Gallagher Subject:STVR Input from > 10 year La Quinta Resident EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. All, My wife and I are > 10 year La Quinta and PGA West residents ‐ as well as PGA West club members. We are (and have been) very concerned about the proliferation of STVR in our community. We are now full time residents and love La Quinta. We have invested a great deal of money in our home and our club membership ‐ and would be very upset if we had to move out of LQ due to the STVR situation. We have already had our best friends ‐ who we convinced to come to PGA West and join the club leave after two years ‐ when the house next store went STVR and they were routinely assaulted with noise every weekend ‐ many times until 2am or later. We occasionally experience STVR issues, but luckily not to the extent that they did. That being said, a home next to us could obviously go STVR at any time under the current regulations. We appreciate the efforts to cap STVRs and strengthen and enforce the rules and regulations at the city level ‐ but have real concerns about the long term effectiveness of this strategy when I read the skewed misinformation coming from the pro‐STVR advocates and investors bent on embedding business in our residential neighborhoods. We support the agenda of Neighbors for Neighbors as outlined below. Note the cautionary tale outlined in a recent WSJ article ‐ https://www.wsj.com/articles/for‐these‐retirees‐short‐term‐ rental‐bans‐arent‐just‐a‐perktheyre‐a‐must‐11614276068 . 1.Current moratorium is extended until permanent structural changes can be made to the STVR program; as a minimum these changes would included but not be limited to; 2.Cap on STVRs in residentially zoned areas not to exceed 3% 3.A minimum STVR rental period immediately beginning at 3 nights, increasing to 10 nights after 18 months and to 28 nights after 36 months. Best, Jim and Janet Gallagher LQ, 92253 CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS JIM & JANET GALLAGHER BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 - RECOMMENDING STRICTER STVR REGULATIONS 2 The following process was suggested to reduce STVRs in RD, free up housing to meet state standards and community needs, reduce code enforcement, and continue a revenue stream for the City through TOT from other zones. Suggested Five‐year Transition: STVRs are at “over‐capacity” in RD Permanent Moratorium on unsupervised STVRs in RD No new STVR business permit licenses in RD Incentivize Tourist Commercial STVRs Attrition will result in a decrease in density in RD o Natural progression as houses sell or owners relinquish permits o Problem houses’ permit revoked o 1031 exchange out of RD to Tourist Commercial Concerns: A concern regarding the work of the last year of updating code enforcement might be wasted time was put forth. Yet, these efforts were needed to reduce problems at existing STVRs and will be a road map going forward, with the goal of reducing load on code enforcement. It was also mentioned that proliferation of STVRs in RD does not create good boundaries for opportunities for developers to build STVRs in Tourist Commercial Districts. Important: Plan for Future Revenue While reviewing the General Plan, I saw that much of economic development seems to be focused on increased tourism. The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership outlined the most critical objective for the area is to diversify beyond tourism.* When you continue to cater to licensing STVRs, you are denying La Quinta the opportunity it needs most to have a stable residential population. I would suggest a committee conduct some open, public workshops where the public could suggest ideas to increase LQ’s future revenue stream. The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership stated that the objective to become more economically diversified includes encouraging tech workers and specified that NOW is the opportunity to gain these individuals as they can work remotely. That would ensure a stable resident population, increase purchase power for local businesses, and generate increased sales, the City’s #1 revenue. I have a background in Economic Development through the Arts and have many ideas of sustainable revenue income from that business sector. I know there are many residents who also have excellent ideas on ways to diversify La Quinta’s economy. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS Arlene Gotshalk La Quinta, CA Subject: Support of Permanent Moratorium on unsupervised STVRs in Residential Districts Madam Mayor and Council Members, Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today. I am a full‐time resident of the Cove Neighborhood. While listening to the end of the City Council at the Feb 25th Special Council Meeting, I heard Councilman Radi say STVRs in Residential Districts are at more than capacity. He proposed that an indefinite Moratorium in Residential Districts would begin to solve some of the ongoing problems of STVRs in RD such as the cost of increased enforcement staff, the jeopardy to resident’s safety and well‐being, and the loss of housing for entry and moderate income residents. The Council went on to begin a discussion of dealing with the proliferation of unsupervised STVRs in Residential Districts (RD) with such a Moratorium. The following process was suggested to reduce STVRs in RD, free up housing to meet state standards and community needs, reduce code enforcement, and continue a revenue stream for the City through TOT from other zones. Suggested Five‐year Transition: STVRs are at “over‐capacity” in RD Permanent Moratorium on unsupervised STVRs in RD No new STVR business permit licenses in RD Incentivize Tourist Commercial STVRs Attrition will result in a decrease in density in RD o Natural progression as houses sell or owners relinquish permits o Problem houses’ permit revoked o 1031 exchange out of RD to Tourist Commercial Concerns: A concern regarding the work of the last year of updating code enforcement might be wasted time was put forth. Yet, these efforts were needed to reduce problems at existing STVRs and will be a road map going forward, with the goal of reducing load on code enforcement. It was also mentioned that proliferation of STVRs in RD does not create good boundaries for opportunities for developers to build STVRs in Tourist Commercial Districts. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS Important: Plan for Future Revenue While reviewing the General Plan, I saw that much of economic development seems to be focused on increased tourism. The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership outlined the most critical objective for the area is to diversify beyond tourism.* When you continue to cater to licensing STVRs, you are denying La Quinta the opportunity it needs most to have a stable residential population. I would suggest a committee conduct some open, public workshops where the public could suggest ideas to increase LQ’s future revenue stream. The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership stated that the objective to become more economically diversified includes encouraging tech workers and specified that NOW is the opportunity to gain these individuals as they can work remotely. That would ensure a stable resident population, increase purchase power for local businesses, and generate increased sales, the City’s #1 revenue. I have a background in Economic Development through the Arts and have many ideas of sustainable revenue income from that business sector. I know there are many residents who also have excellent ideas on ways to diversify La Quinta’s economy. Once again, I appreciate and support the suggestions made at the Special City Council Meeting February 25, 2021 and look forward to fine tuning and implementing that plan. *https://sbemp.com/local‐leaders‐discuss‐the‐economic‐future‐of‐the‐coachella‐valley‐in‐free‐ webinar‐series/ Sept. 23 to Nov. 18, 2020 CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From:Ricardo Gray Sent:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:30 AM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:Ricardo Gray Subject:Written comments on STVRs EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. 1)Full Name 2)City of Residence 3)Phone Number 4)Public Comment 5) Subject 6)Written or Verbal Telephonic Comments Full name: Richard Gray City of residence: La Quinta Phone number: Public Comment: Written Comments Subject: STVRs in La Quinta open neighborhoods Written or Verbal: Written Comments Is the city of La Quinta opening itself up to possible future lawsuits regarding STVRs? 1) Owners who are denied permits for STVRs could sue for unfair and arbitrary regulations allowing some to operate STVRs while denying the same right to other property owners. 2) Owners could sue for being denied the right to own more than one STVR - after all, the right goes with the property and not with the owner since that would be unjustified and discriminatory. 3) Owners wishing to sell could sue for an unfair reduction in their property value based on STVRs operating commercially near their homes. That is an obvious loss caused by benefiting some owners against the property values of other owners. 4) Neighbors could sue for compensation since allowing commercial STVRs takes away the property rights that were part of the original purchase of their homes - assured to be solely residential but now interspersed with undesirable commercial sites. 5) At some point the owners of hotels/motels may sue for equal treatment since STVRs are not subject to the same regulations and requirements but are direct competition for short-term rentals. One example may be local STVRs don't have the same fire suppression installation regs. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICHARD GRAY BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS AND POTENTIAL FOR LAWSUITS 2 Even given new regulations for compliance control, neighbors will suffer the loss of property value including a potentially longer time to complete a sale. The STVR adds no value to the other property owners who bought into homes in R-1 and R-2 zoned neighborhoods. As an objective example, see the Wall Street Journal article on last Friday about STVRs in a number of different areas. Even owners of STVRs apparently want to buy their own homes in neighborhoods that prohibit STVRs - conclusion is that "STVRs are fine for you, but not for me!" Wall Street Journal: REAL ESTATE HOMES For These Retirees, Short-Term Rental Bans Aren’t Just a Perk— They’re a Must Some senior homeowners are seeking out neighborhoods and communities that keep online platforms like Airbnb and Vrbo at bay CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICHARD GRAY BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS AND POTENTIAL FOR LAWSUITS 1 From:Heredia, Joan Sent:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:42 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:March 2 2021 Council Meeting Written and Request to provide verbal comments on STRVs Attachments:City of La Quinta STRVs - Heredia Comments.docx EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Clerk, Attached are my written and request to provide verbal comments on the March 2, 2021, Business Meeting Agenda Item 2, Short term Vacation Rental (STRVs) Full name: Joan Heredia City of residence: La Quinta Phone: Comment on: March 2 2021 Agenda, Business item 2 Subject: STRVs Attached written comments that I would also like to present verbally I appreciate your consideration of my request, Joan Heredia CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOAN HEREDIA BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS & SUPPORTING INDEFINATE MORATORIUM TO: City of La Quinta Council From: Joan Heredia, Homeowner in PGA West Date: March 1, 2021 Subject: STVR’s regulations, Written and (Request to Provide ) Verbal Comments for March 2 Business Meeting Agenda Item 2 Dear Mayor and Council, I want to thank you for your efforts in regulating STVRs, especially within the PGA West Community which as you have noted is problematic. I oppose STVRs in residential neighborhoods as a matter of good land use policy. That said, I do appreciate that the City Council is trying to find a compromise solution that bridges from the current situation to a long‐term solution. I have participated in both the January 27 and February 25 meetings and believe the La Quinta City Council has shown a capacity to weigh the various competing interests and is heading in a direction that tries to be fair to current STVR owners yet also listening to residents that want to see STRV’s either eliminated or highly regulated. I would encourage you to continue the discussion on limiting the number of bookings to a number less than what was established in Palm Springs and as soon as possible develop a separate ordinance that codifies the moratorium on short term housing within residential zoning areas indefinitely. I am a PGA West owner who bought 19 years ago, based on the peaceful enjoyment and neighborly community that was shared among residents. At that time, most homes that did have short term occupancy was among family and friends and occurred occasionally. The explosion of web‐based apps that would create the ability for second home investors to run homes like unsupervised hotels was completely unforeseen in a neighborhood zoned for residential use. As times and technology have changed, so most local land use ordinances be adopted to maintain the intent of land use area designations. We are seeing many areas in California limiting STRVs to maintain a housing stock for residents without unduly driving up home prices or changing community character by people who want to run businesses out of homes. I want to place emphasis that most of the areas under discussion are within the Residential Zoning designation and that no property owner has unfettered freedom to do what they want with their property. A person cannot run a printing business or other enterprise out of their home with a substantial number of clients cycling through the property in residential zoning. This is founded on good land use policy that seeks to locate compatible uses within designated areas of a city. If the City of La Quinta is highly pressed for locations for visitors to stay then the Council and people that desire to be STVR operators should be focusing on locations and development with in Tourist Commercial designated areas or expanding these areas within the City through the established land use process. I agree with the Council’s two strike policy to weed out properties that cause disturbances and to establish quite times. I like the idea of a signed formed where renters must acknowledge they understand and will abide by the community rules. I appreciate the need to charge fees that represent the level of effort incurred in the City’s effort to manage these activities. I have some unease that a moratorium and relying upon attrition may take a long time to result in a meaningful reduction in STVRs, but understand this may be the outcome of compromise. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOAN HEREDIA BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS & SUPPORTING INDEFINATE MORATORIUM The one item that I believe the Council dismissed too soon is the limit on the number of bookings per year. It was deemed not a problem since most current City of La Quinta STRV bookings were less than what is allowed in Palm Springs (Limit 32 + 4 in summer). Many speakers indicated that Palm Springs is not necessarily the appropriate model for the City of La Quinta. I suggest no more than 24 bookings per year as this would be more than sufficient to cover the many festival weekends in proximity to our neighborhood but also give consideration to resident’s concerns about high STRV activity. If you limit (and hopefully decrease) the number of STRVs but not bookings, this may just drive up the frequency of their use causing more localized adverse impact to adjacent landowners. A lack of any booking limit at all is worse outcome for residents than the Palm Springs ordinance and at the very minimum at least adopt the Palm Springs booking limit. Towards the end of the meeting in February, there was discussion regarding the STRV moratorium and adoption into an ordinance. I highly encourage the Council to codify the moratorium and to keep it in place indefinitely. It is only in this manner that the City can return to the core requirement for good land use planning and compatible uses in residential zoned areas governed by clear ordinances with long term requirements and vision. I applaud your efforts and stamina for the long meetings you have endured. It is understood your job is challenging and you likely will not make everyone completely happy. I hope you will take my comments into consideration and I appreciate the opportunity to present my thoughts on this matter with the goal of providing constructive input to the Council. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOAN HEREDIA BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS & SUPPORTING INDEFINATE MORATORIUM 1 From:Tiff Gmail Sent:Monday, March 1, 2021 7:21 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written comments ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I am in favor of good short term rentals. They bring money to the city and they allow access for people who cannot afford hotels. They employ lots of locals as well. I will tell you a story quickly, last week I had a guest staying at my house and they complained there were parties on either side. I called the complaint line because I think short term rentals that allow parities are bad for all of us. Neither party was a rental. Both owners of homes or long term rentals so how do short term rentals hurt? My guest came out to relax and could not. I am all for good rentals with good enforcement. A limit to how many should not even be considered because this would decrease taxes to the City. Thank you- Tiffany Katuls CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT TIFFANY KATULS BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSIBLE STVRS 1 From:Grant Miser Sent:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:17 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Madam Mayor, Mayor pro tem, and Esteemed Council Members, My name is Grant Miser and I am a property owner in La Quinta, CA. I love La Quinta and look forward to the time in my life that I can spend all of my winters in your beautiful city. I am writing to you out of concern for the council's discussion on short term rentals and the possibility of extending the current moratorium on new short‐term rental permits indefinitely. I purchased the home in August as an Airbnb (previous owner was using it as such), shortly before the moratorium on permits was first put in place. My intention in buying the property (and what I sold my wife on to get her to agree) is to utilize it as a short term rental until such a time in 10 years that we can begin spending our winters in La Quinta. Knowing that the covid pandemic would eventually pass, I moved forward in good faith in preparing the property for rentals. We invested over $100,000 beyond the down payment in repairing the home, making it safe for renters, and furnishing it. When the moratorium was extended again, we started renting it on a 32+ day basis to try to mitigate our losses. My first renter checked out this Sunday and I was in town to make sure their experience was first class. I've watched every council meeting and followed your discussion closely. I can appreciate that there are no easy solutions and valid points on all sides of the argument. I feel like the council has done a good job navigating those and is now proposing solutions that seem like a fair compromise. I do feel, however, that those property owners in my situation are at risk of being overlooked. In the last meeting when discussing the possibility of an indefinite extension to the moratorium Council Member Fitzpatrick stated in reference to the council's responsibility to those residents who are selling their homes, "I think it's just fairness to people looking to buy houses here to know what our rules are and how we are playing" In fairness, the current moratorium was attached to Covid and shouldn't be parlayed into an indefinite extension without some accommodation for those who bought properties during it or shortly before. Many of us bought homes significantly above appraisal value because of current market pressures and belief in our being able to participate in the STVR program As requested by Council Member Pena, I have a proposed solution. I ask that you provide a 30‐60 day window after the falling off of the current moratorium to allow those who bought properties during the moratorium or shortly before it to apply for and receive a permit. You could possibly do this by rescinding the current moratorium while the new ordinance is still in the process of being accepted as law. By doing so you still are accommodating those residents opposed to STVR by having a foreseeable end date to new permits, you are accommodating good actors within the current STVR program to operate as long as they continue to do so by the rules, and you are providing fairness to those of us who bought homes, invested hundred of thousands of dollars into them, and want to be good members of your community. I hope you will thoughtfully consider this proposed solution. I fear that if you do not myself and many others in my situation will lose our homes and investment. Respectfully, Grant Miser CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT GRANT MISER BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN SUPPORT OF STVRS 1 From:JESSE RHODES Sent:Monday, March 1, 2021 5:55 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Short term rental program ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I have been in la Quinta for over 25 years and and I have not seen any real problems with short term rental any higher than problem neighbors which I’ve also had a few of those were last 40 years so I support short term rentals and less government restriction for property rights freedom! But I do believe that better code enforcement for breaking the rules and certainly it makes sense to increase fees to cover short term rentals by the property owners that make profit from there properties thank you Jesse Rhodes Sent from my iPhone CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JESSE RHODES BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN SUPPORT OF STVRS 1 From:Bob Stoddard Sent:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 2:50 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Public Comments - City of La La Quinta City Council Meeting - 03/02/21 EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. March 2, 2021 Bob & Cindy Stoddard La Quinta, CA Public Comment STVR Written Comment EXTEND THE MORATORIUM PERMANENTLY ON NEW LICENSING OF ABSENT OWNER STVRS IN OUR R-1 ZONES. We have lived in La Quinta, since 2004, and chose this city, particularly North La Quinta for its quiet, friendly and family atmosphere, which we have enjoyed immensely except for the current state we presently find ourselves in, which is the over saturation of STVRs in our surrounding neighborhood and area. We recognize the monumental task, which the City has undertaken to comprehensively address all aspects of the STVR program and the multiple impacts it has on a wide array of people, whom have either been directly or indirectly affected by the STVR program. As homeowners, presently surrounded by five(5) STVRs and the high probability of two(2) additional recently purchased homes for the express purpose of converting into STVRs, we strongly encourage the City Council and Staff to proactively resolve this matter, with a strong sense of urgency and necessity, concerning the overall density and clustering of STVRs in our residential neighborhood. The express purpose and reasons for us in choosing North La Quinta, as our permanent place of residence, is of paramount importance to us today. The City to date has recognized and mitigated most issues or concerns, which has been identified by various parties, except for density and overall number of STVRs in a given neighborhood or the surrounding area. We consider these concerns to be the most pressing and important, and can not convey to the City Council and Staff, the urgency and significance, we residents have placed on CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS BOB & CINDY STODDARD BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS & EXTEND THE MORATORIUM PERMANENTLY 2 these concerns from the outset. Once again, we ask the City Council and Staff to direct its energy and attention towards this matter and fully address the repeated concerns and desires of the residents. Respectfully, Bob & Cindy Stoddard CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS BOB & CINDY STODDARD BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS & EXTEND THE MORATORIUM PERMANENTLY 1 From: Sent:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:45 AM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:Linda Evans; Steve Sanchez; John Pena; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick Subject:written comments in favor of STVRS ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I strongly urge the La Quinta city council to NOT impose a permanent moratorium on short-term vacation rentals. Artificially constraining the supply of vacation rentals will create a shortage that will only exacerbate existing problems. Let the free market work out these issues. The covid-19 pandemic situation has played a big role in igniting the STVR controversy in La Quinta, The pandemic isn't going to last forever, and it's a mistake to impose any sort of permanent solution on the basis of temporary blips in STVR popularity. Some city council members have expressed concerns about STVR density in PGA West, but those problems should be worked out at the PGA West HOA level. One of the PGA West HOAs is voting right now on the issue. Why preempt local HOA solutions with citywide action? Michael Sweeney / homeowner PGA West CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MICHAEL SWEENEY BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITIION OF PERMANENT STVR MORATORIUM 1 From:Marie Thompson Sent:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 8:29 AM To:Jon McMillen; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Linda Evans; Monika Radeva; Robert Radi; Steve Sanchez Subject:Written comment : March 2 Council meeting. STVR EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. City Manager, City Council, Mayor. We can’t express our disappointment in your handling of the STVR issue and your refusal to listen to your residents. Your Adhoc committee and N4N group worked very hard to try and work with you, but you never really had any intention of listening, it was all smoke and mirrors. This issue will not go away and as residents we will not forget your total disregard to the neighborhoods asking for your help. You need to implement a permanent ban on any new STVR, as you did nothing to address density. If any of you on the council, mayor or city manager have any ownership/partial STVR or in your portfolios you need to recuse yourself from this issue. Craig and Marie Thompson 8 year LaQuinta resident ‐‐ Marie Thompson CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 – WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS CRAIG & MARIE THOMPSON BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 – IN OPPOSITION OF STVRS 1 From:Linda Evans Sent:Monday, March 1, 2021 12:45 PM To:Monika Radeva Subject:Fwd: Pavilion Palms Public Hearing For the record Linda Evans | Mayor City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 C: 760.899.3279 E: levans@laquintaca.gov www.laquintaca.gov www.playinlaquinta.com Begin forwarded message: From: "W. Richard Mills" Date: March 1, 2021 at 12:06:57 PM PST To: John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>, Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>, Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>, Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>, Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Pavilion Palms Public Hearing EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Madame Mayor and City Council Members: As you are well aware, I am opposed to the proposed gas station at Pavilion Palms. I think it is a blemish on what I consider the Gateway to SilverRock. However, if you must have it, at least disguise it or have it screened from direct view from Jefferson. We simply cannot allow a Circle K. If you think about it there have been little or no renderings of the gas station. Thus, we have no idea of what it will look like. Finally, I am also concerned with disrupting traffic circulation with 18 wheelers entering and exiting the property. I question whether staff has studied the consequences of the turns that will be required. Dick CITY COUNCIL MEETING – MARCH 2, 2021 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICHARD MILLS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - IN OPPOSITION OF A GAS STATION AT THE PAVILION PALMS PROJECT