Loading...
2022 06 07 Council Reg Mtg Held Jointly with HA Special Mtg - Coral Mtn ResortAGENDA Page 1 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, JUNE 7, 2022 3:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION | 4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION SPECIAL HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETING ON TUESDAY, JUNE 7, 2022, AT 4:00 P.M. ****************************** SPECIAL NOTICE Teleconferencing and Telephonic Accessibility In Effect Pursuant to Executive Orders N-60-20 and N-08-21 executed by the Governor of California, and subsequently Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361, 2021), enacted in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.), members of the public, the City Council, Housing Authority, the City Manager/Executive Director, City Attorney/Authority Counsel, City Staff, and City Consultants may participate in this regular meeting by teleconference. Members of the public wanting to listen to the open session of the meeting may do so by tuning-in live via http://laquinta.12milesout.com/video/live.   Members of the public wanting to address the City Council or Housing Authority, either for a specific agenda item or matters not on the agenda are requested to follow the instructions listed below: Written public comments – can be provided in-person during the meeting or emailed to the City Clerk’s Office at CityClerkMail@LaQuintaCA.gov preferably by 2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City’s web page: www.LaQuintaCA.gov AGENDA Page 2 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING Council and Housing Authority, incorporated into the agenda packet and public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor/Chairperson, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk’s Office can accommodate such request. The email “subject line” must clearly state “Written Comments” and list the following: 1) Full Name 4) Public Comment or Agenda Item Number 2) City of Residence 5) Subject 3) Phone Number 6) Written Comments *** TELECONFERENCE PROCEDURES *** Verbal public comments via Teleconference – members of the public may attend and participate in this meeting by teleconference via Zoom and use the “raise your hand” feature when public comments are prompted by the Mayor/Chairperson; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and Housing Authority and general public and allow him/her/them to speak on the item(s) requested. Please note – members of the public must unmute themselves when prompted upon being recognized by the Mayor/Chairperson, in order to become audible to the City Council and Housing Authority and the public. Only one person at a time may speak by teleconference and only after being recognized by the Mayor/Chairperson. ZOOM LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82540879912 Meeting ID: 825 4087 9912 Or join by phone: (253) 215 – 8782 It would be appreciated that any email communications for public comments related to the items on the agenda, or for general public comment, are provided to the City Clerk’s Office at the email address listed above prior to the commencement of the meeting. If that is not possible, and to accommodate public comments on items that may be added to the agenda after its initial posting or items that are on the agenda, every effort will be made to attempt to review emails received by the City Clerk’s Office during the course of the meeting. The Mayor/Chairperson will endeavor to take a brief pause before action is taken on any agenda item to allow the City Clerk to review emails and share any public comments received during the meeting. All emails received by the City Clerk, at the email address above, until the adjournment of the meeting, will be included within the public record relating to the meeting. ****************************** AGENDA Page 3 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING CALL TO ORDER – CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA – CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA -CITY COUNCIL At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda by providing written public comments either in- person or via email as indicated above; or provide verbal public comments either in-person or via teleconference by joining the meeting virtually at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82540879912 and use the “raise your hand” feature when prompted by the Mayor. Members of the public attending the meeting in-person are requested to complete a “Request to Speak” form and submit it to the City Clerk. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. CLOSED SESSION – CITY COUNCIL 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6; CITY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: CHRIS ESCOBEDO, COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR; AND EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION: LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION 4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6; CITY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: BILL IHRKE, CITY ATTORNEY; AND UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE: CITY MANAGER RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION AGENDA Page 4 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTIONS(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER – HOUSING AUTHORITY ROLL CALL: Authority Members: Evans, Fitzpatrick, Radi, Peña, and Chairperson Sanchez VERBAL ANNOUNCEMENT – AB 23 [AUTHORITY SECRETARY] CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA – HOUSING AUTHORITY PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA – CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY At this time, members of the public may address the City Council and Housing Authority on any matter not listed on the agenda by providing written public comments either in-person or via email as indicated above; or provide verbal public comments either in-person or via teleconference by joining the meeting virtually at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82540879912 and use the “raise your hand” feature when prompted by the Mayor/Chairperson. Members of the public attending the meeting in-person are requested to complete a “Request to Speak” form and submit it to the City Clerk. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). The City Council and Housing Authority value your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY – None CONSENT CALENDAR – CITY COUNCIL NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 3, 2022 11 2. APPROVE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 9, 2022 25 3. APPROVE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 17, 2022 29 AGENDA Page 5 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING 4. EXCUSE ABSENCES OF CHAIRPERSON NIETO AND COMMISSIONER CALDWELL FROM THE MAY 24 AND JUNE 14, 2022, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS, RESPECTIVELY 39 5. AFFIRM RESOLUTION NO. 2021-035 FINDINGS RELATED TO THE STATE OF EMERGENCY DUE TO COVID-19 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE TO IMPLEMENT TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY TO CONDUCT PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361 (STATS. 2021, CH. 165) 41 6. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO CONTRACT WITH CREATIVE LIGHTING INC. FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 CITYWIDE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROJECT NO. 2018-31 FOR A ONE-YEAR TERM EXTENSION AND RELATED COMPENSATION 47 7. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO CONTRACT WITH PWLC II, INC. FOR CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROJECT NO. 2018-30 FOR A ONE-YEAR TERM EXTENSION AND RELATED COMPENSATION 51 8. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO 1) APPROVE PRELIMINARY 2022/23 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1, AND 2) DECLARE INTENT TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 [RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-014 AND 2022-015] 57 9. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO REQUEST COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLACE COLLECTION COSTS FOR SOLID WASTE HANDLING SERVICES AT SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS ON TAX ROLLS [RESOLUTION NO. 2022-016] 89 10. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN TO ATTEND THE INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL SIGNAL ASSOCIATION TRAINING IN ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA FROM JUNE 27-30, 2022 95 11. APPROPRIATE FUNDING IN FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 TO UPFIT 10 CITY OWNED VEHICLES 97 12. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH GOVOS, INC. (FORMER MUNIREVS, INC., DBA LODGINGREVS) FOR SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM SERVICES, TO INCREASE COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22, AND TO EXTEND THE TERM THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 99 AGENDA Page 6 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING 13. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH PALMS TO PINES PRINTING, FOR PROMOTIONAL AND PRINTING SERVICES, TO INCREASE COMPENSATION AND TO EXTEND THE TERM THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 107 14. RECEIVE AND FILE THIRD QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 TREASURY REPORTS FOR JANUARY, FEBRUARY, MARCH 2022 113 15. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED MARCH 31, 2022 167 16. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED MAY 13, 20, & 27, 2022 173 17. ACCEPT WASHINGTON AND FRED WARING TRIPLE LEFT PROJECT NO. 2017-01, LOCATED AT THE WASHINGTON STREET AND FRED WARING DRIVE INTERSECTION 197 18. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2021-08 LOCATED IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS 201 19. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE SILVERROCK PARK VENUE WIFI AND CAMERA BACKBONE PROJECT 205 CONSENT CALENDAR – HOUSING AUTHORITY NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 20. APPROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 3, 2022 209 BUSINESS SESSION – CITY COUNCIL PAGE 1. ADOPT RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS AS TO SUFFICIENCY OF THE INITIATIVE PETITION ENTITLED “PHASE-OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON-HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON- EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,” BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 [RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-017] 213 2. RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT, PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 9212, ASSESSING THE FISCAL, ECONOMIC, AND RELATED IMPACTS OF THE INITIATIVE MEASURE ENTITLED “PHASE-OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON-HOSTED 229 AGENDA Page 7 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,” BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 3. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS: (A) ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE PROPOSING THE “PHASE-OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON-HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,” BY DECEMBER 31, 2024, AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 [RESOLUTION NO. 2022-018] (B) SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF THE SAME [RESOLUTION NO. 2022- 019] (C) REQUESTING RIVERSIDE COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE THE ELECTION FOR THE INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE WITH THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION AND STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 [RESOLUTION NO. 2022-020] 247 STUDY SESSION – CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY PAGE 1. DISCUSS FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED BUDGET 277 2. DISCUSS FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 PROPOSED HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET 353 ADJOURNMENT – HOUSING AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARINGS – CITY COUNCIL – after 5:00 p.m. For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed “Request to Speak” form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. AGENDA Page 8 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING PAGE 1. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0010 AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2019-0003 (AMENDMENT V TO ANDALUSIA SPECIFIC PLAN), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2019- 0002, ZONE CHANGE 2019-0004, SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0002, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005; INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCES APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2019-0004 AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0002; CEQA: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2021020310); LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58, NORTH OF AVENUE 60 AND EAST AND WEST OF MADISON STREET [RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-021 AND 2022-022; ORDINANCE NOS. 600 AND 601] 367 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS – CITY COUNCIL 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY RESOURCES 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC WORKS MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT – COACHELLA VALLEY ENERGY COMMISSION (Evans) 6. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 7. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 8. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 9. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Fitzpatrick) 10. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (Fitzpatrick) 11. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Radi) 12. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Peña) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 14. SILVERROCK EVENT SITE AD HOC COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 15. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Sanchez) 16. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Peña) 17. CVAG VALLEY-WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Peña) AGENDA Page 9 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING 18. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE (Peña) 19. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT – ENERGY CONSUMERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (Peña) 20. COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (Peña) 21. COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS EMERGENCY ECONOMIC RELIEF PROGRAM AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Radi) 22. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Radi) 23. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Radi) 24. CITYWIDE SECURITY CAMERAS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Radi) 25. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Radi & Sanchez) 26. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 27. GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Sanchez) 28. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC WORKS POLICY COMMITTEE (Sanchez) 29. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 30. PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 15, 2022 985 31. HOUSING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES DATED MARCH 9, 2022 989 32. FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES DATED MAY 11, 2022 993 ADJOURNMENT – CITY COUNCIL ********************************* The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on June 21, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk, of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City’s website, near the entrance to the Council Chambers at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at the Stater Brothers Supermarket at 78630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on June 3, 2022. DATED: June 3, 2022 MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California AGENDA Page 10 of 10 JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING Public Notices  The La Quinta City Council/Housing Authority Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777-7123, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made.  If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777-7123. A one (1) week notice is required.  If background material is to be presented to the Councilmembers/Authority Members during the meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting.  Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council/Housing Authority regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Community Development counter at City Hall located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 3, 2022 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Evans. This meeting provided teleconferencing accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-60-20 and N-08-21 executed by the Governor of California, and subsequently Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361, 2021), enacted in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, Pena, Radi, Sanchez (joined the meeting at 3:22 p.m.), Mayor Evans ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: City Manager McMillen, City Attorney Ihrke, City Clerk Radeva, Acting Deputy City Clerk McGinley, Director of Business Unit and Housing Development Villalpando, Management Analyst Kinley, Community Resources Director Escobedo, Community Resource Manager Calderon, Community Resources Analyst Calderon, Human Resources Analyst Triplett, Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney, Traffic Management Analyst Gunterson, Management Analyst Mignogna, Finance Director Martinez, Financial Services Analyst Hallick, Management Analyst Kinley, Design and Development Director Castro, Planning Manager Flores, Code Compliance Supervisor Meredith, Permit Technician Lorett, and Marketing Manager Graham. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Councilmember Pena said he will recuse himself from discussion and vote on Business Session Item No. 2 due to a potential conflict of interest stemming from the proximity of his real property interest to the project location. Council concurred. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 11 CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON MAIN STREET, EAST OF DESERT CLUB DRIVE (WESTERLY PORTION); APNS: 770-123-011 AND 770-124-010 CITY NEGOTIATOR: JON MCMILLEN, CITY MANAGER NEGOTIATING PARTY: WELLS MARVIN UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON AVENIDA LA FONDA, EAST OF DESERT CLUB DRIVE; APNS: 770-125-003, 770-125-002 CITY NEGOTIATOR: JON MCMILLEN, CITY MANAGER NEGOTIATING PARTY: NINO ROSINI UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (QUARTERLY REVIEW) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957, COUNCIL APPOINTED POSITION - CITY MANAGER COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 3: 02 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4: 02 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihrke reported no actions were taken on Closed Session Item Nos. 1 and 2 that require reporting pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1 (Brown Act); and Council will recess back to Closed Session to continue consideration of Closed Session Item No. 3 after the open portion of the meeting. City Attorney Ihrke said Councilmember Sanchez did not participate in the discussion for Closed Session Item No. 1, as he was on a call in his capacity as the City's designee for the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), and he joined the Council meeting at 3:22 p.m. for Closed Session Item No. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Sanchez led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 12 PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Philip Bettencourt, La Quinta - said he serves on the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) Coachella Valley Energy Commission (Commission) as the At -Large Commissioner for Cities; commended the City's 40th Birthday Celebration held on 4/30/2022 at the Civic Center Campus; and noted his support for the independent study on electrical energy service alternatives for certain areas of the Coachella Valley and the importance of this study. Mayor Evans explained the Commission's objective is to develop a long-term strategic plan to continue energy services for the Coachella Valley following the 2033 expiration of the 99-year lease between IID and the Coachella Valley Water District; and LAFCO for the Counties of Riverside and Imperial have selected a consultant to conduct the study, and are awaiting the funding from the State of California pursuant to Governor Newsom's partial approval of Assembly Bill 1021 (Mayes), which has not yet been released from the California Water Resources Control Board. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Alena Callimanis, La Quinta - spoke on behalf of herself and the La Quinta Residents for Responsible Development organization; and presented a slide show explaining her and the organization's appeal to Council to request Planning Commissioner McCune's resignation and set aside the vote taken by the Planning Commission on the Coral Mountain Resort project, at the regular meeting held on April 26, 2022, due to his lack of respect to public speakers and fellow Commissioners. Mayor Evans requested that City Attorney Ihrke, who attended the April 26, 2022, Planning Commission meeting, report on his impression of Commissioner McCune's comments to fellow Commissioners and public speakers. City Attorney Ihrke reported that he attended the meeting and he observed that all the Commissioners had acted with professionalism and in accordance with City expectations and rules of procedure. Mr. Ihrke said that it was his impression that all of the Commissioners were well within the bounds of what would be considered proper decorum under a reasonable person standard. City Attorney Ihrke reported that the City Council, City Manager, and City Attorney's Office take very seriously allegations of any breach of proper decorum during a public meeting, and he reported that neither the chair of the Planning Commission nor any of the members of the Planning Commission raised concerns of improper decorum. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 13 City Attorney Ihrke also reported that state law grants absolute immunity to public agencies and its governing bodies, including the Planning Commission, for verbal or written statements made in connection with official proceedings within the jurisdiction of the governing body. The policy behind this immunity is to promote the utmost freedom of communication on subjects of public interest. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Kay Wolff, La Quinta - requested Council support of the Salton Sea Coalition's resolution requiring that agencies focus on toxic emissions and greenhouse gases when considering a project for water importation; and asked Council to support water importation, the Coalition's preferred solution to the evaporating Salton Sea environmental disaster. Councilmember Radi added that a secondary benefit of a water importation project from the Sea of Cortez or the Pacific Ocean is that it could also include a clean energy production component. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Evans announced the written public comments listed below, which were distributed to Council, made available on the City's website, and included in the record of today's meeting: • Chuck Parker (Desert Hot Springs) with the Salton Sea Coalition, requesting Council adopt a Resolution of Support for the Long -Range Planning Committee of the Salton Sea Management Program to assess potential carbon emissions when conducting the comprehensive analysis of the ocean water import as requested in prior Council Resolutions adopted in 2019 and 2020 (Resolution Nos. 2019-012 and 2020-039). • Alena Callimanis (La Quinta) - submitted a letter on behalf of the La Quinta Residents for Responsible Development requesting Council seek the resignation of Planning Commissioner McCune. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. TALUS - PROJECT STATUS UPDATE Senior Project Manager Josh Frantz with Robert Green Company and Chief Operating Officer with Rilington Group Bruce Maize provided a detailed presentation on the project's overall progress and sequence of activities onsite for 1) Montage Hotel and Spa, 2) Montage Guestrooms, 3) Montage Residences, 4) Conference and Shared Services Building, 5) Golf Clubhouse, 6) Pendry Residences, and 7) Pendry Hotel. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 14 Robert Green, President of the Robert Green Co. (attending via teleconference) added that demolition of Ahmanson Way for underground work and restructuring of the road will cause public inconvenience but a temporary street will be created; undergrounding utilities and onsite work will begin soon on the Pendry residences; a portion of the Pendry Hotel parking lot will be started to provide parking for the clubhouse opening in the fall; and the project schedule is being revamped to account for the concrete delays, but he still expects to meet the deadlines outlined in the Development Agreement with the City. 2. LA QUINTA ART CELEBRATION — MARCH 2O22 — EVENT SUMMARY REPORT PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Paul Anderson, CEO of SCOPE Events, LLC, accompanied by Event Director Kathleen Hughes and Volunteer Manager Debby Nelson, provided an overview of the successful March 2022 art event, challenges due to wind storms, high attendance during the reduced three days the festival was open, increased sales, food and beverage; the need for Wi- Fi; November Veteran's Day event plans; and commended the Council and staff for their collaboration and support in producing the event. Mr. Anderson announced that the La Quinta Art Celebration was named number one fine art and fine craft event in the United States. Council expressed their gratitude to Mr. Anderson and his staff for their great partnership with the City. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 5, 2022 2. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2022 3. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS (A) CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, AND (B) REQUESTING RIVERSIDE COUNTY CONSOLIDATE THE NOVEMBER S. 2022, MUNICIPAL ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION [RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-009 AND 2022-010] 4. AFFIRM RESOLUTION NO. 2021-035 FINDINGS RELATED TO THE STATE OF EMERGENCY DUE TO COVID-19 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE TO IMPLEMENT TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY TO CONDUCT PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361 (STATS. 2021, CH. 165) 5. AWARD CONTRACT TO URBAN HABITAT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENTS COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 15 PROJECT NO. 2016-03F, LOCATED AT THE LA QUINTA TOPAZ DEVELOPMENT, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MILE AVENUE AND WEST SIDE OF DUNE PALMS ROAD 6. APPROVE PURCHASE OF FOUR ADVANCED TRAFFIC CONTROL CABINETS FROM ECONOLITE 7. APPROVE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT MAP NO. 29283, RANCHO LA QUINTA, A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED NORTH OF AVENUE 50 AND EAST OF MOON RIVER DRIVE 8. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2022 9. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED APRIL 15 AND 22, 2022 10. ADOPT RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS FOR EISENHOWER DRIVE FROM AVENUE 50 TO WASHINGTON STREET [RESOLUTION NO. 2022-0111 11. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO UTILIZE TRI- STATE MATERIALS TO PURCHASE UP TO $150,000 OF MATERIALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 12. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC FOR ON -CALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR SERVICES 13. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO UTILIZE MACIAS NURSERY, INC. TO PURCHASE UP TO $100,000 OF PLANT MATERIALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/ Fitzpatrick to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended, with Item No. 3 adopting Resolution Nos. 2022-009 and 2022-010, Item No. 4 reaffirming Resolution No. 2021-035, and Item No. 10 adopting Resolution No. 2022-011. Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPROVE GOLD STAR FAMILY MONUMENT DESIGN AND ART PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH SELECTED ARTIST FOR THE COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 16 DESIGN AND BUILD OF THE MONUMENT, AND APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL FUNDING Community Resources Analyst Calderon presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council discussed recognizing Gold Star Families of the Coachella Valley, not only La Quinta families; the symbolism of the monument; limitations to including human figures in the monument design; abstract design being more inclusive; general support for Option 2 design, possibly with a circular base; and messages can be included on the monument to achieve inclusivity. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/ Sanchez to approve Option No. 2 design for the Gold Star Family Monument with a round base; approve Art Purchase Agreement with CJ Rench artist for design and build of the monument; appropriate funds; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed unanimously. 2. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH IN -SITE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. TO PROVIDE MASTER PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE FRITZ BURNS PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2021-02, LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND AVENIDA BERMUDAS COUNCILMEMBER PEIVA RECUSED HIMSELF FROM DISCUSSION AND VOTE ON BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 DUE TO A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST STEMMING FROM THE PROXIMITY OF HIS REAL PROPERTY INTEREST TO THE PROJECT LOCATIONS; AND LEFT THE DIAS AT 5:13 P.M. Management Analyst Mignogna (attending via teleconference) presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Tim Jachlewski, President of IN -SITE Landscape Architecture, Inc. (attending via teleconference) provided additional information. Council discussed importance of community outreach for public input; the need for on -site input from youth patrons of the park; integration of the park and the City's adjacent maintenance yard facility; proposals for the City's teardrop/paisley-shaped parcel and its potential as a future boutique hotel site, and public transportation station; additional shade and lighting for the playground; inclusion of bike racks in the design; and cautioned that funding used to develop parks can permanently preclude the land from reverting to other uses. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 17 PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Alena Callimanis, La Quinta - noted that "splash zone" water must be properly cooled and sanitized as it's been reported that a baby died due to ameba growing in warm, under sanitized "splash zone" waters in another city. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/ Radi to approve Agreement for Contract Services with IN -SITE Landscape Architecture, Inc. in the amount of $79,375 to provide Master Planning Services for the Fritz Burns Park Improvements Project No. 2021-02; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed: ayes - 4, noes - 0, absent - 1 (Pena), abstain - 0 COUNCILMEMBER PENA RETURNED TO THE DIAS AT 5: 37 P.M. FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING 3. APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF INDIO FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF: 1) AVENUE 50 WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2022-05, 2) JEFFERSON STREET AND HIGHWAY 111 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 2022-07, AND 3) JEFFERSON STREET SLURRY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 2021-17; AND APPROPRIATE FUNDING FOR JEFFERSON STREET SLURRY IMPROVEMENTS Management Analyst Mignogna (attending via teleconference) presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council discussed funding for this joint Indio -La Quinta and Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) project in which 75% of the costs being paid for by CVAG, with the remaining 25% split between Indio paying three quarters, and La Quinta paying one quarter based on each city's proportionate share of roadway; maintenance of the completed project will be done by each city for the roadway portions in each city's jurisdiction; importance of coordinating proper notification and signage for the surrounding communities; and sharing traffic monitoring data with Indio during construction. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/Radi to: A. Appropriate funding in the amount of $594,000 for Jefferson Street Slurry Improvements Project 2021-17. B. Approve Cooperative Agreement with the City of Indio for the design and construction of: 1) Avenue 50 Widening Improvements Project No., 2022-05 (from Jefferson Street to Madison Street); COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 IV* 2) Jefferson Street and Highway 111 Intersection Improvements Project No. 2022-07; and 3) Jefferson Street Slurry Improvements Project 2021-17. C. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed unanimously. MAYOR EVANS CALLED FOR A BRIEF RECESS AT 5: 51 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE COUNCIL MEETING AT 6: 00 P. M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL (STVR) PROGRAM 2021 AND FIRST QUARTER 2022 CHARACTERISTICS, COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OVERVIEW City Clerk Radeva, Permit Technician Lorette, and Code Compliance Supervisor Meredith presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council discussed that every property in areas exempt from the ban on new permits has the option to obtain a permit, but not all of them do, and at least one exempt area has zero permits; requested confirmation from staff that the density calculation for south La Quinta excludes properties in exempt areas; the 71 complaints stemmed from 48 properties and after multiple fines, the City's remedy if they continue to offend is to instigate a lawsuit against them; data shows that most offenders comply after receiving high fines; since 2021, program expenses have decreased by $300,00 to $400,000 as revenue has increased; program permit revenue is sufficient to cover program expenses with transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenue and fines going into the General Fund to cover City services like one-third of the police budget; appreciation for the quality, comprehensiveness and tracking of the data by staff; cost increases due to inflation are expected in 2022; discontinuing the STVR program would result in a loss of about $3.5 million in TOT revenue to the City; the improvement in compliance in the program since the height of disruption in 2020, during the COVID-19 quarantine period, due to the various adjustments made by the City; quality of life for residents has been the Council's primary focus in making adjustments over the past two years; 2022 festival season was busy for Code Compliance but far fewer complaints than in previous years; the disturbances caused by the Revolve Fyre Fest 2.0, and the need for greater restriction on their permit should Revolve apply again next year for an event permit; request for Visit Greater Palm Springs hotel COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 19 occupancy data for festival periods; and reminder that this report along with all data and charts are available for public viewing on the City's website. 2. DISCUSS CITYWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM (PSCS) PHASE 1 RECAP AND PHASE 2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Management Analyst Gunterson presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Riverside County Sheriff's Department Lieutenant Martinez spoke about traffic during the festivals; the benefits of the PSCS and automatic license plate recognition (ALPR) cameras in assisting with crime and collision investigation; the policies, training, access, retention, etc. for traffic video data set forth by Senate Bill 34 (SB 34); and La Quinta being one of only three Riverside County cities without ALPR. Council discussed the time interval between yellow and red traffic lights; the limitations of ALPR systems; and the ability to request ALPR video from surrounding cities when following suspects. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT: Mayor Evans said written public comment was received from resident Mario Sewell in opposition of the license plate readers, which were distributed to Council, made available on the City's website, and included in the record of today's meeting. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Kay Wolff, La Quinta - Ms. Wolff questioned if the City's goal to reduce costs by installing the PSCS eight months ago had been evaluated yet; who monitors the images; who has access; will the Immigration and Naturalization Service have access; the clarity of night images; posting a map of the location of the 22 cameras in the City; safeguards to counter the dangers of potential misuses of images; amendments to the City Code to reflect the updated technology; possible conflict between La Quinta's retention policy for such data and that set forth by SB 34; name/title of staff person who will be designated the ""end user;" State reporting and regular meeting update requirements; and suggested more publicity for public input next time this is on the agenda so the benefits and potential abuses can be aired publicly. Council continued to discuss that the City is under no legal obligation to share the video or data collected but have a policy to share it with the Police; including in the evaluation, Riverside County Sheriff Department's preferred software; integration of the current PSCS system with an ALPR system; the poor quality of PSCS images at night versus the filtering and clarity of ALPR night images; ALPS systems have assisted in solving hundreds of regional COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 20 crimes once license plate alerts are widely disbursed; safeguards and authorization to access images requires a signed agreement, need -to -know, right -to -know, associated case number and monthly audits to insure only authorized personnel for authorized reasons are accessing; upgrading to fiber to improve images is expensive, and tying into outside third -party internet providers, such as Spectrum or Frontier, would compromise the security of the data; details of the current complex security protocol; the possibility of the City installing ALPS and transferring ownership to the Police since the only purpose of the system is to assist in solving crimes; pros and cons, alternatives, and cost -benefit analysis of extending fiber lines to the top of the cove to capture images; the cost benefit in reductions to Police budget if ALPS is installed; the benefit of incremental phasing of imagining systems being the reduction of cost and the perfection of the technology over time; ability to block -out license plates captured that are not of interest or under investigation; procedure for public record requests for images; and refusal by Council to consider any sort of facial recognition technology now or in the future. Council reached a consensus and directed staff to explore the next phases of enhancements; research various vendors and options; evaluate which agency should hold ownership of the system; develop a plan for public outreach which could include sharing statistics and success stories; provide Police data on the number of unsolved crimes due to inability to read license plates since the PSCS system was installed; include data on the PSCS usefulness in future Police Department quarterly reports; and conduct a test with PSCS cameras installed at a lower height to see if plate images improve. Next Steps for Phase 2 PSCS: • Phase 2 PSCS Project proposed in fiscal year 2022/23 CIP funding • Obtain PCSC integrator contract • Obtain bids for Phase 2 PCSC system • Install Phase 2 PCSC system • If Council approves ALPR cameras, PSCS policies and procedures would be modified to be compliant with SB34 which establishes regulations for agencies using license plate reader technology • Continue community outreach and provide public access opportunities Staff will report back to Council with more data and a project timeline by the end of summer. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS - All reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 21 MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS Councilmember Radi commended City Attorney Ihrke for his service and dedication to the City and community; Council echoed his comments. Councilmember Radi commended the City's board and commission members for their service and dedication. Councilmember Pena reported on the success of the City's 40t" years birthday event held at the Civic Center Campus on April 30, 2022. Mayor Evans announced that there will be a Special Public Meeting, held virtual and jointly with the cities of La Quinta, Indio and Coachella on Monday, May 9, 2022, to discuss energy and infrastructure options and alternatives due to IID's incapacity and deficiencies. The public and all Councilmembers are invited to join. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS La Quinta's representative for 2022, Mayor Evans reported on her participation in the following organization's meeting: • CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE La Quinta's representative for 2022, Mayor Pro Tern Fitzpatrick reported on her participation in the following organization's meeting: • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) La Quinta's representative for 2022, Councilmember Pena reported on his participation in the following organizations' meetings: • CVAG VALLEY -WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE • IID ENERGY CONSUMERS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE La Quinta's representative for 2022, Councilmember Radi reported on his participation in the following organization's meeting: • SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY CLOSED SESSION - Continued 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (QUARTERLY REVIEW) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957, COUNCIL APPOINTED POSITION - CITY MANAGER COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 7: 58 P.M. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 12 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 22 MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 9: 55 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1 (Brown Act), City Attorney Ihrke reported Council completed the City Manager's performance review and took the following action on Closed Session Item No. 3: MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/ Pena to renew the City Manager's employment agreement for three additional years, effective the expiration of the current agreement, with an amendment for the extension to be brought back at a future Council meeting. Motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Fitzpatrick to adjourn at 9:56 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California COUNCIL MINUTES Page 13 of 13 MAY 3, 2022 23 24 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 i CITY COUNCILS OF LA QUINTA, INDIO and COACHELLA MINUTES MONDAY, MAY 9, 2022 CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:08 p.m. by Mayor Evans. This meeting provided teleconferencing accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-60-20 and N-08-21 executed by the Governor of California, and subsequently Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361, 2021), enacted in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: La Quinta Councilmembers John Pena, Robert Radi, Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tern Kathleen Fitzpatrick, and Mayor Linda Evans ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: La Quinta City Manager Jon McMillen, City Attorney William H. Ihrke, City Clerk Monika Radeva, Acting Deputy City Clerk Laurie McGinley CITY OF INDIO: Councilmembers Elaine Holmes, Glenn Miller, Lupe Ramos-Amith, Mayor Pro Tern Oscar Ortiz, Mayor Waymond Fermon, City Manager Bryan Montgomery, City Attorney Roxanne Diaz, and City Clerk Sabdi Sanchez CITY OF COACHELLA: Councilmembers Megan Beaman Jacinto, Denise Delgado, Neftali Galarza, Mayor Pro Tern Josephine Gonzalez, Mayor Steve Hernandez, City Manager Gabriel Martin, City Attorney Carlos Campos, and City Clerk Andrea Carranza IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (IID): IID Director JB Hamby, General Manager Henry Martinez, and Associate General Counsel Jamie Asbury CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 3 MAY 9, 2022 1113IIfi°ClAIII..... IM IlfirlIIi.." 111711ING 101IN"'III" ;]I[TIIIH C1 III"';1111i.° 11F" 11IM11D10 AIN1113 C AC1144IIfi°111.....III,,,,A 25 RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Supervisor V. Manuel Perez and Chief Operating Officer Juan Perez PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Evans led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS AND FINANCING MECHANISMS FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY CITIES WITHIN THE IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT SERVICE TERRITORY La Quinta City Manager McMillen and Indio City Manager Montgomery presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Officials discussed the degree to which Riverside County staff is engaged in discussions; mapping of existing and potential substations on County land; understanding the totality of the upgrades needed to produce the projected 540 megawatt capacity output in 10 years including substations, transmission lines and generation plants; identifying funding from each city, rate -payers and IID, and funding mechanisms such as bonds and developer impact fees; short-term means to add some capacity to existing substations; the role of a financing authority; resolving ownership of system upgrades; possibility of cities pre -ordering equipment due to supply chain delays of two to three years; expectation that cities and the unincorporated county area would address the need and cost of substations within their jurisdictions, and IID would thereafter maintain the entire Coachella Valley -wide system; the pros and cons of utilizing mini/micro grids that are installed, owned and maintained by either a city or a developer; viability of a public/private funding solution; excess capacity needed in place in order for cities to attract developers; conveying to existing residents/rate-payers the current critical situation, and the benefits of upgrades to them in the future; importance of taking immediate steps to address short-term needs, and begin taking concrete steps to reach long-term goals; estimated percentage of a city's investment that would be paid by developers, and percentage that would be paid by rate increases; the mutual benefits in jobs and quality of life to neighboring cities when each city grows, improves and develops - acknowledgement that cities are codependent with connected destinies; the type and duration of bond issues for the upgrades; how historic low IID energy rates have lead to this CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 3 MAY 9, 2022 111311[° lA III,,,, IM llf it llf it 111711ING 1 1 IN"'III" X"'11114 C I"'III "';111[° 11 " 11IM11D10 AIN1113 COAC 111411[° III,,,, III,,,,A 26 crucial moment when action is essential; timing and details of how a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) would work among the cities; the current IID process for reviewing requests for new service; La Quinta's specific equipment need for future growth, and currently overloaded transformers; Mayors and City Managers from each city on the IID Energy Consumers' Advisory Committee (ECAC) will continue to work on this, and welcome all interested Councilmembers and residents to attend; use of IID's Rate Stabilization Fund; the cost, impacts, and value of undergrounding utilities; caution to insure a city does not overbuild capacity resulting in unused/unreimbursed capacity/cost paid by residents; pressures for growth in the Coachella Valley are not expected to cease; the need for Riverside County staff to engage in discussions; foresight needed now by residents and leaders for future growth and quality of life; next steps for cities to examine their needs, resources and desire to participate in this regional project, and to hold meetings to obtain feedback from their residents; setting the next joint meeting for June 2022 once collective staff has gathered additional information; suggestion to include in the discussion, the areas of Salton City, Desert Shores and Bombay Beach, which are outside the Coachella Valley/ Imperial County; and gratitude by Councilmembers to the City Managers, ECAC Committee Members and IID, and statements of support for the plan they developed and for continued swift progress. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made by La Quinta Councilmember Radi and seconded by a show of hands of all attending Mayors and Councilmembers to adjourn at 4:40 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 3 MAY 9, 2022 111'011[° lA III,,,, IID llf it llf it 111711IN " ,1 1 IN"'III" WX"'I 111H C I"'III "';111[° 011 " 111MID10 AIN1113 COAC 111H III:..", III,,,, III,,,,A 27 w CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2022 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Mayor Evans. This meeting provided teleconferencing accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-60-20 and N-08-21 executed by the Governor of California, and subsequently Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361, 2021), enacted in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, Pena, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: City Manager McMillen, City Attorney Ihrke, City Clerk Radeva, Acting Deputy City Clerk McGinley, Director of Business Unit and Housing Development Villalpando, Management Analyst Kinley, Management Specialist Griffin, Community Resources Director Escobedo, Public Safety Manager Mendez, Community Resources Manager Calderon, Community Resources Analyst Calderon, Marketing Manager Graham, Finance Director Martinez, Financial Services Analyst Hallick, Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney, Design and Development Director Castro, and Hub Manager Sanchez. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Evans led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Lynda Farnen, La Quinta - opposed the proposed housing developments located at Avenue 50 and Washington Street; stated that multi -unit housing puts excess demands on traffic, schools, and COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 29 public facilities; and suggests that in this area, which is a single -family - housing community, better uses would be assisted living facilities or senior housing. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Dr. Audrey Reed, La Quinta - opposed the proposed housing developments located at Avenue 50 and Washington Street due to the impacts from lighting, noise and traffic; concerned about the sufficiency of the fence/wall separating properties; supports a senior living facility instead; stated that traffic density continues to increase in the area; and urged the City to upgrade maintenance and sidewalks on Avenue 50 between Washington Street and Park Avenue. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Kevin White, La Quinta (Fairways) - opposed the proposed housing developments located at Avenue 50 and Washington Street due to the negative effect 350 units would have on the residential area; concerned that the traffic study is five years old and done when congestion was not year-round; believes parcels are better suited for much needed senior and assisted living which generates less impact; and Council must balance the need for tax revenue with La Quinta's quality of life standard. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Wilbert Friesen, La Quinta - submitted a request to speak opposing the proposed housing developments located at Avenue 50 and Washington Street but elected not to speak. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Angie Lafferty, La Quinta (Fairways) - opposed the proposed housing developments located at Avenue 50 and Washington Street as well as all development in La Quinta that results in the loss of natural habitat and disruption of the desert's bio-crust; noted that concrete and pavement prevents replenishment of the aquafer and the 120-150 degrees that pavement reaches, increases the air temperature; stated that the medium to high density housing will increase air pollution, add stress to the power grid, schools, police and fire services, and parking problems along Avenue 50 by the school; and suggested that a better location for this density of housing would be a more walkable area with nearby retail. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Dante Gomez, La Quinta (Parc La Quinta) - opposed the proposed housing developments located at Avenue 50 and Washington Street due to the high density of auto and pedestrian traffic at that intersection already. Mayor Evans reported that WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS were received as listed below, which were distributed to Council, made available on the City's website, and included in the record of today's meeting: COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 30 • Keith Meyer, La Quinta - on behalf of the Duna La Quinta HOA 1, opposing the proposed housing developments at Avenue 50 and Washington Street. • Morgan Myrmo, La Quinta - in support of short-term vacation rentals. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Alena Callimanis, La Quinta - spoke on behalf of herself and La Quinta Residents for Responsible Development organization regarding their May 3, 2022, letter to Council opposing Planning Commissioner McCune's behavior during the regular Planning Commission meeting of April 26, 2022; stated that Commissioner McCune should have recused himself from discussion on the Coral Mountain Resort project given his statements; and asked Council to have a discussion with Commissioner McCune regarding his disrespect to public speakers at Planning Commission meetings. City Attorney Ihrke reported that he attended the meeting in question and observed the decorum of all Commissioners among themselves and toward the public which was never inappropriate in his opinion. He explained the procedure that Commissioners can initiate if they believe there has been a breach in decorum and stated that no Commissioners raised any such concern. Mr. Ihrke further explained the absolute immunity granted elected and appointed officials to freely express their opinions on matters within their body's jurisdiction. Lastly, he said that courts have found there has been a violation of decorum when meetings are so disrupted that they must be recessed due to noise or violence. Mayor Evans said that she reviewed the meeting tape and found that there was a healthy discussion both pro and con of the Coral Mountain Resort project, that the Council values the diversity of opinion of its Commissioners, and with no evidence of unprofessional conduct, she would not support any action against Commissioner McCune or a set aside of the vote taken at that meeting. Councilmember Fitzpatrick concurred. PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY: Carolyn Winnor, La Quinta - read into the record written comments provided by resident Lisa Castro in opposition of the Coral Mountain Resort project. PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY: Steven Frischi, La Quinta - stated that La Quinta was designated as a major fire risk area in the RiskFactor.com link published 5/17/2022 in the Desert Sun, which resulted in his fire insurance being cancelled. Mr. Frischi requested that the City Manager and City Attorney look into this report as he believes it is an error. Council directed staff to research this fire designation as this same mislabeling error happened a few years ago and staff initiated a correction at that time. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 31 PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Dorian Whitney, Coachella Valley - opposed to the Coral Mountain Resort project due to water usage, and destruction of the beautiful and unique rock formations; and suggested a water feature for visitors to cool down instead of a huge wave pool. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Denise Welch, Indio - President of the newly formed national non-profit "Helping You Heal Gardens, Inc." whose mission is to facilitate the creation of public community healing gardens throughout the U.S.; stated that La Quinta public parks would be an ideal location for one of the organization's first gardens; and she provided a hand-out, which was distributed to Council, made available on the City's website, and included in the record of today's meeting. Mayor Evans explained the City's Community Services Grant Program and encouraged Ms. Welch to apply on behalf of her non-profit organization. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. INTRODUCE LA QUINTA LIBRARY BRANCH MANAGER SARA DELACRUZ Riverside County Library System Deputy Director Sue Duran introduced La Quinta Library Branch Manager Sara Delacruz and gave a brief presentation of Ms. Delacruz' experience and background. Ms. Delacruz spoke of her background and appreciation for her position at the La Quinta Library branch. 2. COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (CVAG) AND COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION COMMISSION - 2021 COACHELLA VALLEY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) ANNUAL REPORT CVAG Regional Planner Peter Satin gave a presentation on the history of the Coachella Valley's habitat; background of the MSHCP; the MSHCP's objective to preserve the habitat and its native species; and status of the installation of the remainder of the Big Horn Sheep protection fence required by California Fish and Wildlife. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE AGREEMENTS FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC., DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND PWLC II, INC., FOR ON -CALL PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE SERVICES COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 32 2. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., FOR ANNUAL LEVY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 3. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH OCEAN SPRINGS TECH, INC. FOR A ONE-YEAR TERM EXTENSION AND RELATED COMPENSATION FOR POOL AND WATER FEATURE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROJECT NO. 2020-11 4. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT WITH VINTAGE ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROJECT NO. 2018-32 FOR A ONE-YEAR TERM EXTENSION AND RELATED COMPENSATION 5. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH, INC. TO EXTEND CONTRACT FOR TWO ADDITIONAL YEARS FOR ON -CALL PLANNING SERVICES 6. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH ERIC NELSON DBA RASA FOR ON -CALL MAP CHECKING SERVICES 7. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE, LLC FOR CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES 8. AFFIRM RESOLUTION NO. 2021-035 FINDINGS RELATED TO THE STATE OF EMERGENCY DUE TO COVID-19 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE TO IMPLEMENT TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY TO CONDUCT PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361 (STATS. 2021, CH. 165) 9. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2016-03F3, LOCATED AT THE LA QUINTA MARBELLA AND SIERRA DEL REY DEVELOPMENT, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MILES AVENUE AND EAST SIDE OF ADAMS STREET COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 33 10. AWARD CONTRACT TO JACOBSSON ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE JEFFERSON STREET AT AVENUE 53 ROUNDABOUT PROJECT NO. 2017-09 11. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED APRIL 29 AND MAY 6, 2022 12. ADOPT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING OCEAN WATER IMPORTATION TO REFILL THE SALTON SEA WHILE REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS [RESOLUTION NO. 2022-012] 13. APPROVE ONE-YEAR TERM EXTENSION OF SOLUTIONS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH SUPERION, LLC TO PROVIDE HOSTING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE CITY'S TRAKiT PERMITTING SOFTWARE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENTS PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Chuck Parker, Palm Desert - (Item No. 12) spoke in support of Salton Sea restoration efforts and thanked the Council and the City for its continued support. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Feliz Nunez, Bermuda Dunes - (Item No. 12) spoke in support of Salton Sea restoration efforts and the substantial health and environmental benefits of the water importation plan. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/ Fitzpatrick to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended, with Item No. 8 reaffirming Resolution No. 2021-035, and Item No. 12 adopting Resolution No. 2022-012. Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH GREATER COACHELLA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (GCVCC) Director of Business Unit and Housing Development Villalpando and Marketing Manager Graham presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Emily Falappino, President/CEO of the Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce provided additional information. COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 34 Council discussed the effectiveness and reasoning for changing The Gem publication from monthly to bi-monthly; including in The Gem a listing of community businesses to connect residents to the amazing community partners; publishing a special edition of The Gem for business promotion perhaps at the beginning of summer; ensuring that the information published is timely, not stale or repetitive; concern that lead time of two to three months for content will preclude inclusion of impromptu events; consequence for advertisers that have twelve month contracts; readership preference for paper versus digital; importance of monthly publication November to April, and summer promotion of businesses for year-round residents; focus on improving the writing and content; the value of The Gem to residents, businesses, and the City; the need to determine if the improvement desired is accomplished with increased competency or increased time to prepare; importance of identifying problem so public money is well spent on this service; locations for the Hot Rod & Custom Car Show to enhance the event and showcase local businesses; leveraging the Taste of La Quinta trademark; opportunities afforded by the SilverRock park and public event space; effectiveness of visiting businesses to make government -chamber -business personal connections; refocus of the Chamber in promoting, engaging and assisting businesses; determining post-COVID needs of businesses; getting feedback from The Gem advertisers as well as businesses that are not Chamber members and that do not advertise in The Gem; including in The Gem a survey to gauge the community's thoughts on decreasing The Gem issues per year; the high expectations for immediate results when businesses buy ads; and cost of increasing the page count from eight to ten -twelve at $1,100 per page. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/ Fitzpatrick to bring back this item for Council consideration at the June 21, 2022, regular meeting. Motion passed unanimously. 2. APPROVE CANCELLING THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS OF JULY 5, AUGUST 16, AND SEPTEMBER 6, 2022 Council waived presentation of the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/ Sanchez to approve cancelling the regular City Council meetings of July 5, August 16, and September 6, 2022. Motion passed unanimously. 3. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AMENDED FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH BURRTEC WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES, LLC FOR SOLID WASTE HANDLING SERVICES AND ADJUSTED MAXIMUM SERVICE RATES [RESOLUTION NO. 2022-0131 COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 35 Management Specialist Griffin presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Frank Orlett, Vice President, Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC provided additional information. Council discussed automatic tax roll billing versus direct billing; outstanding services provided by Burrtec; process for food waste sorting and composting; monitoring contamination and courtesy notices to residents for non- compliance; the State's purpose in mandating green waste recycling; edible food recovery and Find Food Bank's participation; documentation of residents and businesses that are composting; complying with this unfunded State mandate via City-Burrtec partnership; Burrtec's plan for gradual roll -out of program and swapping out of old trash containers; composted waste marketed to farmers and golf courses by Burrtec; kitchen counter compost pails to be provided by Burrtec upon request; and waste pick up days to be changed for some residents for route efficiency. City Attorney Ihrke said the proposed resolution included in the agenda packet was revised to accurately reflect the approval of an Amended and ""Restated" Franchise Agreement, which is a non -substantive amendment. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/ Sanchez to adopt Resolution No. 2022-013 as amended, to approve an Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement with Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC for solid waste handling services and adjusted maximum service rates; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amended and restated agreement: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDED AND RESTATED FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH BURRTEC WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES, LLC FOR SOLID WASTE HANDLING SERVICES, EFFECTIVE JULY 11 2022 Motion passed unanimously. MAYOR EVANS CALLED FOR A BRIEF RECESS AT 6: 52 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE COUNCIL MEETING AT 7: 03 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED BUDGET COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 36 Finance Director Martinez and Financial Services Analyst Hallick presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council discussed the need to protect all sources of revenue; requested marketing rate -of -return data before the budget is passed in June; the expanded responsibilities and related cost increases to the City Clerk's budget; importance of reading the accompanying narrative along with budget charts for transparency and understanding; budgeting for some cement benches at Y points up in the Cove as resting and photography sites, and possible inclusion of workout stations; adequacy of the IT budget to protect City government from cyber-attacks; importance of remaining consistent and conservative in budget projections; consideration of examining grant funding levels and partnerships with other organizations; need to anticipate inflation; and the thoroughness and clarity of the report prepared by the Finance Department staff. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS - All reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. City Clerk Radeva explained the process for the new voting centers. MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS Councilmember Pena reported on the Bruce Lee Memorial relay; single-family housing projects built to rent only; upcoming Desert Valley Builders Association luncheon regarding power; sympathies to the communities where terrible mass shootings have occurred lately; and attendance at the All -Valley Chamber at the Palm Springs Air Museum. Councilmember Radi requested that the Police conduct a threat assessment of all places of worship and other vulnerable public establishments in La Quinta. Councilmember Sanchez reported his attendance at the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority's 2nd Annual Governance Leadership Academy held in Palm Desert, May 5-6, 2022. The Academy was geared towards seasoned elected officials from throughout the state and focused on effective and ethical leadership. Mayor Evans reported Harvey Milk breakfast; Silence event. on the Coachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine; the the Sherriff's Career Day; and the upcoming Ride -of - COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 37 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS La Quinta's representative for 2022, Mayor Evans reported on her participation in the following organizations' meetings: • CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS - 2022 GENERAL ASSEMBLY BUSINESS SESSION - DELEGATE La Quinta's representative for 2022, Mayor Pro Tern Fitzpatrick reported on her participation in the following organization's meeting: • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) La Quinta's representative for 2022, Councilmember Sanchez reported on his participation in the following organization's meeting: • ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Fitzpatrick to adjourn at 8:00 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10 of 10 MAY 17, 2022 01 CST•]OFF■O��i7_1�■017_1:i��■u■►C•iCl City of La Quinta 11,.,. COUNCIL IKE 1F1F ING�June 7, 2022 1,.,AFT I IE IP �,� IN I,.,, GIIEINIIIB "II""'1'TIIIIE: EXCUSE ABSENCES OF CHAIRPERSON NIETO AND COMMISSIONER CALDWELL FROM THE MAY 24 AND JUNE 141 20221 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS, RESPECTIVELY R.IE C " II II E IN ID " '1 10N Excuse absences of Chairperson Stephen Nieto and Commissioner Mary Caldwell from the May 24 and the June 14, 2022, Planning Commission meeting, respectively. E IECUT'IE SLEWMAlRY • On May 24, 2022, Chairperson Nieto advised staff that he could not attend the Planning Commission Meeting that day due to illness. Chairperson Nieto has no excused or unexcused absences for fiscal year 2021/22. • On June 1, 2022, Commissioner Caldwell requested to be excused from the June 14, 2022 Planning Commission Meeting, as she will be out of the country. Commissioner Caldwell has one (1) excused and no unexcused absences for fiscal year 2021/22. IF1SC L' I P " No meeting attendance compensation is paid to absent members. B n i G lid U IIII' III N n II11, Y 1 The Municipal Code states: ""If any member of a board, commission or committee absents him/herself from two consecutive regular meetings, or absents him/herself from a total of three regular meetings within any fiscal year, his/her office shall become vacant and shall be filled as any other vacancy. A board, commission or committee member may request advance permission from the city council to be absent at one or more regular meetings due to extenuating circumstances, and/or may request the city council to excuse an absence after -the -fact where such extenuating circumstances prevented the member from seeking advance permission to be absent. If such permission or excuse is granted by the city council, the absence shall not be counted toward the above -stated limitations on absences." Mai IILI""IIII IIII .II "T" IE Council may deny this request, which would result in the absence(s) being counted toward the Chairperson and Commissioner's limitation on absences as noted above. Prepared by: Laurie McGinley, Acting Deputy City Clerk Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 t f Quinta 11,.,.Y COUNCILICY IE 1F1F IING : June 7, 2022 1,.,AFT I IE IP �,� IN I,.,, GIEIiID T'TIILIIE: AFFIRM RESOLUTION NO. 2021-035 FINDINGS RELATED TO THE STATE OF EMERGENCY DUE TO COVID-19 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE TO IMPLEMENT TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY TO CONDUCT PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361 (STATS. 2021, CH. 165) RJIE o II IM IE II ID T'1 IN Affirm Resolution No. 2021-035 findings related to the state of emergency due to COVID-19 authorizing the City Manager to continue to implement teleconference accessibility to conduct public meetings pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 (Stats. 2021, Ch. 165). E E C iU'T'I E S U IIIM IIGY • Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 (Stats. 2021, Ch. 165) (AB 361), which waived certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) and authorized local agencies to hold public meetings via teleconferencing whenever a state of emergency exists that makes it unsafe to meet in person, Council must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency every 30 days and affirm the required findings in order to continue to allow teleconference accessibility for public meetings. • On September 28, 2021, Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-035 (Attachment 1) making the required findings under AB 361 and authorizing the City Manager to implement teleconference accessibility to conduct public meetings. F' SC L 'I` II'T - None. B CIi:GliUINID IN L S' AB 361 was signed into law by the Governor on September 16, 2021, which went into effect immediately as urgency legislation (codified under Government Code § 54953) and waived certain provisions of the Brown Act in order to allow local agencies to continue to meet remotely. Specifically, the bill allows remote teleconference flexibility, but only when there is a state of emergency that makes it unsafe to meet in person. 41 In addition, AB 361 added specific procedures and clarified the requirements for conducting remote meetings, including the opportunity for the public to provide public comment in real time; the legislative body shall take no actions during disruptions; and the legislative body, by majority vote, shall determine that meeting in person would present imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees and shall affirm these findings every 30 days, in order to continue to allow teleconference accessibility for conducting public meetings [Government Code § 54953(e)(3)]. AB 361 will sunset on January 1, 2024. The City has implemented procedures for conducting public meetings to ensure full compliance with AB 361. In addition to the ability to attend public meetings in -person, teleconference accessibility via call -in option or an internet-based service option (via the Zoom Webinars platform) is listed on the published agenda for each meeting as well as on the City's website. The City monitors attendance via teleconference as well as email correspondence (as published on the agenda) throughout each public meeting and provides access for public comment opportunities in real time both verbally and in writing. On September 28, 2021, Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-035 making the initially required findings under AB 361 in order to allow the City to continue to offer teleconference accessibility for public meetings after September 30, 2021, to help mitigate the spread of COVID-19. As noted above, Council must reconsider the state of emergency due to COVID-19 every 30 days and affirm the findings under Resolution No. 2021- 035 in order to continue to allow teleconference accessibility for conducting public meetings. Council has affirmed the findings under Resolution No. 2021-035 as follows: • October 19, 2021 • February 15, 2022 • November 16, 2021 • March 151 2022 • December 7, 2021 • April 5, 2022 • December 21, 2021 • May 3, 2022 • January 18, 2022 • May 17, 2022 Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Council Resolution No. 2021-035 42 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2021 - 035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY FOR CONDUCTING PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361 (STATS. 20211CH. 165) WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, the Governor of California proclaimed a State of Emergency to exist in California as a result of the threat of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the City Council adopted Emergency Resolution No. EM 2020-001, proclaiming a local emergency as defined in La Quinta Municipal Code Section 2.20.020, due to the threat of the existence and spread of COVID-19; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the Governor of California executed Executive Order N-29-20 which suspended and modified specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section § 54950 et seq.) and authorized local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meeting accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and address the local legislative body; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, the Governor of California executed Executive Order N-08-21 which extended the provisions of Executive Order N- 29-20 concerning teleconference accommodations for public meetings through September 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, the Governor of California signed into law Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361, Rivas) (Stats. 2021, ch. 165) amending Government Code § 54953 and providing alternative teleconferencing requirements to conduct public meetings during a proclaimed state of emergency; and WHEREAS, AB 361 (Stats. 2021, ch. 165) imposes requirements to ensure members of the public are able to attend and participate in public meetings conducted via teleconference, including: 43 Resolution No. 2021 — 035 Teleconference Procedures for Conducting Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 (Stats. 2021, ch. 165) Adopted: September 28, 2021 Page 2 of 4 • Notice of the means by which members of the public may access the meeting and offer public comment, including an opportunity for all persons to attend via a call -in option or an internet-based service option; • The legislative body shall take no further action on agenda items when there is a disruption which prevents the public agency from broadcasting the meeting, or in the event of a disruption within the local agency's control which prevents members of the public from offering public comments, until public access is restored; • Prohibits the legislative body from requiring public comments to be submitted in advance of the meeting and specifies that the legislative body must provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the legislative body and offer comments in real time; • Prohibits the legislative body from closing the public comment period until the public comment period has elapsed or until a reasonable amount of time has elapsed; and WHEREAS, the City has already implemented and is in full compliance with the requirements listed above when conducting public meetings via teleconference, which are now codified in Government Code § 54953(e)(2)(B- G); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code § 54953(e)(B), the legislative body shall hold a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees. The City Council must make these findings no later than 30 days after the first teleconferenced meeting is held pursuant to AB 361 (Stats. 2021, ch. 165) after September 30, 2021, and must also make these findings every 30 days thereafter, in order to continue to allow teleconference accessibility for conducing public meetings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares that the recitals set forth above are true and correct, and incorporated into this resolution as findings of the City Council. .N Resolution No. 2021 — 035 Teleconference Procedures for Conducting Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 (Stats. 2021, ch. 165) Adopted: September 28, 2021 Page 3 of 4 SECTION 2. The City Council hereby declares that a state of emergency as a result of the threat of COVID-19 still exists and continues to impact the ability of members of the public, the City Council, City Boards, Commissions, and Committees, City staff and consultants to meet safely in person. SECTION 3. The State of California and the City of La Quinta continue to follow safety measures in response to COVID-19 as ordered or recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), California Department of Public Health (DPH), and/or County of Riverside, as applicable, including facial coverings when required and social distancing. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby declares that, pursuant to the findings listed in this Resolution, the City Manager is authorized to utilize teleconferencing accessibility to conduct public meetings pursuant to AB 361 (Stats. 2021, ch. 165) and Government Code § 54953, as amended thereby. SECTION 5. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. SECTION 6. Effective Date: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 28th day of September, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Fitzpatrick, Pena, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None W Resolution No. 2021 - 035 Teleconference Procedures for Conducting Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 (Stats. 2021, ch. 165) Adopted: September 28, 2021 Page 4 of 4 w, LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City lerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: r .4. ........., WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California w f �La Quinta CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 ty C11-Y COUNCIL CII II IEIE'1" I G June 7, 2022 �31" FF IRI I OIR I " GE11D "II""'1'TII IIEw APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO CONTRACT WITH CREATIVE LIGHTING INC. FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 CITYWIDE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROJECT NO. 2018-31 FOR A ONE-YEAR TERM EXTENSION AND RELATED COMPENSATION R.IIE I IE li' ID 1 lid Approve Contract Change Order No. 3 with Creative Lighting, Inc., for a one-year term extension through June 30, 2023, a 7% increase in compensation, in an amount not to exceed $72,767 for fiscal year 2022/23, to provide Citywide Lighting Maintenance Services Project No. 2018-31; and authorize the City Manager to execute the change order. E E .'."U'U E SUM14ARY • The Lighting Maintenance Services provides landscape lighting maintenance of medians and parkways throughout the City. This lighting is important for motorist safety and street aesthetics. • Creative Lighting, Inc. has provided citywide lighting maintenance services for the City since 2019, following a request for qualifications and proposal. • Change Order No. 3 (Attachment 1) requests a one-year term extension and a 7% increase in compensation, for a total contract amount of $72,767 for fiscal year (FY) 2022/23. f° CSCAL II IR' wI Total compensation for fiscal year 2022/23 would be $72,767, which includes a 7% increase of $4,761 to the 2021/22 compensation amount. The annual cost is allocated to the L&L Fund (215-7004-60104). These costs are included in FY 2022/23 proposed operating budget. FY Compensation FY Total Compensation Initial Contract 2019/20 $ 76,198 $ 76,198 Change Order No. 1 - 15% decrease 2020/21 $ 11,430 $ 64,768 Chan e Order No. 2 - 5% increase 2021/22 $ 3,238 $ 68,006 Chan e Order No. 3 - 7% increase 2022/23 $ 4,761 $ 72,767 47 The Landscape and Lighting District 89-1 (L&L District) operates in a deficit and is annually subsidized by the General Fund. The current subsidy projected for the 2022/23 budget is $1,257,964. BAC IK. IR ° I III IIII N III,.°y"S�]. The L&L District provides landscape and lighting maintenance services Citywide, and includes all public medians, parkways, and retention areas. These services are necessary for roadway safety, water retention, and visual aesthetics. On April 11, 2019, a request for qualifications and proposal was advertised to provide landscape lighting maintenance of medians and parkways throughout the City; three proposals were received; and the contract was awarded to Creative Lighting, Inc. on May 21, 2019, based on their qualifications and experience. In May 2020, the City executed Change Order No. 1 for a one-year term extension for FY 2020/21, and a 15% compensation decrease due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In May 2021, the City executed Change Order No. 2 for a one-year term extensions for FY 2021/22, and a 5% increase in compensation. Change Order No. 3 proposes a one-year term extension for FY 2022/23, and a 7% compensation increase of $4,761 as a result of increased labor, material and fuel costs, for a total not to exceed contract amount of $72,767. Based on the contractor's performance, staff recommends Council approval of Change Order No. 3. "IER14AT1VES Council may direct staff to prepare new bid documents and specifications to advertise the Citywide Lighting Maintenance Service Contract for Fiscal Year 2022/23. However, that would cause a delay in services. Prepared by: Dianne Hansen, Management Analyst, Parks/Landscape Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Contract Change Order No.3 ta ATTACHMENT 1 --- GEM of the DESERT' — Sheet 1 of 1 AGREEMENT: CITYWIDE LIGHTING MAINTENTANCE SERVICES, LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT 89-1 PROJECT NO. 2018-31 CONTRACTOR: CREATIVE LIGHTING & ELECTRICAL, INC. CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 ************************************************************************ Pursuant to the terms of the original Agreement for Contract Services, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Agreement. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Agreement. *************************************************************** DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 1. As provided in Section 1210 - Contract sum is amended as follows: the total contract amount of $68,006 is increased to $72,767 which includes a 7% contract increase of $4,761 2. As provided in Section 2000, 2.0, contract terms; the City and Contractor agree to extend the term of the contract for the second (1) one-year extension, commencing on July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. ********************************************************************* Previous Agreement Amount Through Change Order No. 2 $68,006 Add This Change Order $ 4,761 Revised Agreement Total $72,767 By reason of this change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: -365- days added/deleted to contract time. The start date for these services shall be: 07/01/2022 Submitted By: Date: Approved By: Date: *************************************************************** We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted By: Title: President/CEO Print Name: Anthony Spinuzzi Print Company: Creative Lighting & Electrical, Inc. M1 50 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 City af �La Qt.jiata C."11-Y COUNCIL IE IE'1" I� June 7, 2022 SI" 0 FF IRI IR I" GIIEIINID "I""'1'TIIIEw APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO CONTRACT WITH PWLC II, INC. FOR CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROJECT NO. 2018-30 FOR A ONE-YEAR TERM EXTENSION AND RELATED COMPENSATION RIECI IE IIN ID "I""' " IIN Approve Contract Change Order No. 5 with PWLC II, Inc. for a one-year term extension through June 30, 2023, and a 7% increase in compensation, in an amount not to exceed $721,010 for fiscal year 2022/23, to provide Citywide Landscape Maintenance Services Project No. 2018-30; and authorize the City Manager to execute the change order. IE JE C iUT'I IE SUM11R,Y • The City contracts landscape maintenance services for all public medians, parkways and retention areas throughout the City. • PWLC II, Inc. has provided citywide landscape maintenance services for the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 (L&L) since 2019, following a request for qualifications and proposal. • Change Order No. 5 (Attachment 1) requests a one-year term extension, a 7% increase in compensation, and winter overseeding at Fire Stations 70 and 93, for a total contract amount of $721,010 for fiscal year (FY) 2022/23. f"I I''. L °I" I I PIACwI The total contract cost for FY 2022/23 would be $721,010, which includes a 7% increase of $47,079 from FY 2021/22 compensation and the cost of overseeding Fire Stations 70 and 93 for $1,375. The annual cost is allocated between L&L (215-7004-60112) and Fire Station funds (101-2002-60112). These costs are currently included in FY 2022/23 proposed operating budget. 51 FY Compensation FY Total Compensation Initial Contract 2019/20 $ 687,059 $ 687,059 Change Order No. 1 - change of areas 2020 $ 4 $ 687,055 Chan e Order No. 2 - 15% decrease 2020/21 $ 90,713) $ 596,342 Change Order No. 3 - additional service maintenance areas 2020/21 $ 14,094 $ 610,436 Change Order No. 4 - 5% increase 2021/22 $ 62,120 $ 672,556 Change Order No. 5 - 7% increase & Fire Stations 70 & 93 winter overseeding 2022/23 $ 47,079 $ 1,375 $ 721,010 The L&L operates in a deficit and is annually subsidized by the General Fund. The current subsidy projected for the 2022/23 budget is $1,257,964. B o C IKG IR U Il ID NALYS1S The L&L provides landscape and lighting maintenance services citywide. This includes all public medians, parkways, and retention areas. These services are necessary for roadway safety, water retention, and visual aesthetics. On April 11, 2019, a request for qualifications and proposal was advertised to provide citywide landscape maintenance services for the L&L; four proposals were received; and the contract was awarded to PWLC II, Inc. on May 21, 2019, based on their experience and qualifications. In February 2020, the City executed Change Order No. 1 to include additional maintenance areas, and removal of areas. In June 2020, the City executed Change Order No. 2 for a one-year term extension for FY 2020/21, and a 15% compensation decrease due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In December 2020, the City executed Change Order No. 3 which included additional maintenance areas. In May 2021, the City executed Change Order No. 4 for a one-year term extension for FY 2021/22, a 5% increase in compensation and additional service areas. Change Order No. 5 proposes a one-year term extension for FY 2022/23, which includes a 7% increase in compensation of $47,079 due to increased labor, materials and fuel costs, and $1,375 for winter over -seeding at Fire Stations 70 and 93, for a total contract amount $721,010. Based on the contractor's performance and response time to correct issues, staff recommends Council approval of Change Order No. 5. 52 LII" IE IR wI , E Direct staff to prepare new bid documents and specifications to advertise the Citywide Landscape Maintenance Service Contract for 2022/23. Prepared by: Dianne Hansen, Management Analyst, Parks/Landscape Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Contract Change Order No.5 53 54 ta Qaigra — — GEM of the DESERT' — ATTACHMENT 1 Sheet 1 of 1 AGREEMENT: CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENTANCE SERVICES, LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT 89-1 PROJECT NO. 2018-30 CONTRACTOR: PWLC II, INC. CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 ************************************************************************ Pursuant to the terms of the original Agreement for Contract Services, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Agreement. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Agreement. *************************************************************** DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 1. As provided on Section 1240 - Contract sum is amended as follows: the total contract amount of $672,556 is increased to $721,010 which includes a 7% contract increase of $47,079. 2. As provided in Section 2000, 2.0, contract terms; the City and Contractor agree to extend the term of the contract for the third one-year extension, commencing on July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 3. As provided in Section 3000, 7.0 Turfgrass, C. Winter Over -Seeding, add overseeding of Fire Stations 70 and 93; cost $1,375. ********************************************************************* Previous Agreement Amount Through Change Order No. 4 $ 672,556 Add This Change Order $ 47,079 Add This Change Order $ 1,375 Revised Agreement Total $ 721,010 By reason of this change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: -365- days added/deleted to contract time. The start date for these services shall be: 07/01/2022 ............................................................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 Submitted By: Date: Approved By: Date: *************************************************************** We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted By: Title: President Print Name: Paul Rasmussen Print Company: PWLC II, INC 55 56 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 City of" LaQU �i �n ��t a �.:.:11-Y COLYNCIL IEIEl"INGJune 7, 2022 SI" 0 FF IRI I 'OIR I" IIEIINIID "II""'1'TIIIIEw ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO 1) APPROVE PRELIMINARY 2022/23 ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1, AND 2) DECLARE INTENT TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 R IE w I IE IN ID n"I""' " IN A. Adopt a Resolution approving the preliminary 2022/23 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1; and B. Adopt a Resolution declaring the City's intent to levy annual assessments for construction, maintenance and servicing landscape and lighting improvements within the Citywide Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 and giving notice thereof. E E C QT'1 E SQM114XRY • Annually, Council must take certain actions to allow the City to levy annual assessments pertaining to Citywide Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 (District). • These actions include adopting the recommended resolutions and scheduling a public hearing (Hearing). • The annual assessments fund 44% of the citywide landscape, lighting, median, and parkways maintenance costs. The 2022/23 assessment rate will remain at $35.60 per dwelling/parcel also identified as an equivalent benefit unit (EBU). This has been the rate since 1997. • Any increase to the assessment rate requires a benefit analysis; new assessments must then be approved by a majority vote of all property owners within the City, which comprises the District. 1�� "I" S C " IL °I" P wI The estimated 2022/23 cost for retention basin maintenance, and median and parkway landscape and lighting maintenance is $2,390,300 (Table 1). 57 The EBU will generate an estimated $982,336. The City will also receive $150,000 from County Service Area 152, levied by Riverside County, for retention basin maintenance. The combined income is projected to be $1,132,336, leaving a shortfall (funded by the General Fund) of $1,257,964. B C Ii G IRCH I IN ID kNALYS1S In 1989, the City formed the District to fund the maintenance, construction, and servicing of landscape areas, streetlights and traffic signals. Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City must annually perform a series of activities as outlined in Attachment 1, including preparation of an annual engineer's report. The 2022/23 Preliminary Engineer's Annual Levy Report (Engineer's Report), included as Exhibit A to the first resolution, has been prepared by City staff and Willdan Financial Services (Willdan provides parcel recognition support) to establish the maintenance budget and identify the benefitting parcels. Below is a comparison of the 2021/22 and 2022/23 Engineer's Reports (Table 2). Citywide Benefit Zone Number of Local Benefit Zones Number of Equivalent Benefit Units (EBU's) EBU Rate District Revenue 2021/22 Yes 6 27,594 $35.60/EBU $982,336 2022/23 Yes 6 27,594 $35.60/EBU $982,336 Willdan does not project an increase in EBU's from 2021/22 to 2022/23; actuals will be based on the final 2022/23 County Secured Tax Roll. All property owners, including those within the six local benefit zones, would be assessed a flat rate. The methodology has remained the same under the provisions of Proposition 218, which prohibits assessment increases without the approval of a simple majority of property owners in a public vote within the District. The Council is required to approve the Engineer's Report and schedule a hearing to allow property owners an opportunity to provide testimony regarding any proposed changes. The hearing is scheduled for June 21, 2022. Approving the Engineer's Report does not impose the proposed EBU; the City can only levy the fee after a public hearing. Upon conclusion of the hearing, Council may consider the testimony and a resolution confirming the assessment diagram and EBU Rate. a The Engineer's report also includes an annual review of the general funds budgeted for parks (Table 1) for City Council to consider if they ever chose to pursue the creation of a Parks Assessment District. L1 E IRJI T' ES Council may elect to increase assessments in order to fully fund the District costs. Staff projects that the assessment would need to increase by $45.75 per EBU to balance the District budget. If the Council selects this option, a District -wide benefit analysis and approval of the new assessments by vote of all affected property owners would be needed. Prepared by: Dianne Hansen, Management Analyst, Parks/Landscape Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Annual Activities Report 59 RESOLUTION NO. 2022 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 IN CONNECTION WITH LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared and filed a report entitled "La Quinta Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, Preliminary Engineer's Report" (the "Report") with the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta; and WHEREAS, the Report has been presented to City Council for review; and WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed such Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The Report, as filed, is hereby approved, included hereto as "Exhibit A" and incorporated herewith by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes and directs the City Clerk to (i) submit certified copies of this resolution to the County of Riverside and (ii) take such other and further actions as may be necessary and proper for the County Assessor to place this assessment on the tax roll. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall go into effect upon adoption. 61 Resolution No. 2022 - XXX Preliminary Engineer's Report L&L District 89-1 Adopted: June 7, 2022 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 7th day of June 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA. City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 62 11 City of La Quinta Street Lighting and Landscape District No. 89-1 2022/2023 ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT Intent Meeting: June 7, 2022 Public Hearing: June 21, 2022 WIW I LLDAN 63 AFFIDAVIT FOR THE ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT City of La Quinta Street Lighting and Landscape District No. 89-1 Riverside County, State of California This Report and the enclosed diagrams show the exterior boundaries of the District therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2022/2023, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this day of , 2022. Willdan Financial Services Assessment Engineer On Behalf of the City of La Quinta Michelle Laase Project Manager, District Administration Services Tyrone Peter P.E. # C 81888 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF LA QUINTA STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO. 89-1 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll thereto attached was filed with me on the day of 2022. BY: Monika Radeva, City Clerk City of La Quinta Riverside County, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, on the day of 1.2022. BY: Monika Radeva, City Clerk City of La Quinta Riverside County, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, on the day of 2022. BY: Monika Radeva, City Clerk City of La Quinta Riverside County, California 65 TABLE OF CONTENTS /. OVERVIEW 1 A. INTRODUCTION 1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION 1 C. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATION 2 ll.D.E.S C IE TI-ON Of T'll l 'T lCT 2 A. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND SPECIFIC AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT 2 B. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT 2 C. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT 4 i IV A. GENERAL B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS C. METHODOLOGY 5 5 6 / DISTRICT /C GETS 1 A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS 10 B. 2022/2023 DISTRICT BUDGET 11 I PII II IIG)II lf)IIIS"'rIizic""r SSIESSII i II 'Im r l[)lAGl:RXM 14 I II IIf;;..:.Jl IIG)III lf;; 2022/2023 C II,,,,,,III,,,,,,IIf;;;;IC""rIIIOIIm ii::Zoi,,,,,III,,,,,, 15 lry WILLDAh! A. INTRODUCTION The City of La Quinta (the "City") annually levies and collects special assessments in order to provide and maintain the facilities, improvements and services within Street Lighting and Landscape District No. 89-1 (the "District"). The District was formed in 1989 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and authorizes the Agency to annually levy and collect assessments to maintain the services and improvements related thereto. This Engineer's Annual Levy Report (the "Report") describes the District, any changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2022/2023. The proposed assessments are based on the estimated cost to maintain improvements that provide special benefit to properties assessed within the District. The various improvements within the District and the costs of those improvements are identified and budgeted separately, including expenditures, deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor Parcel Number ("APN") by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor Parcel Numbers and specific fund numbers on the tax roll to identify properties assessed for special district benefit assessments. Each parcel within the District is assessed proportionately for those improvements provided by the District and from which the parcel receives special benefit. Following consideration of public comments, written protests at a noticed public hearing and review of the Report, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the assessments, the City Council may order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 pursuant to the 1972 Act. In such case, the assessment information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll for each benefiting parcel for Fiscal Year 2022/2023. B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION The District was formed in 1989 pursuant to the 1972 Act. As such, the City has determined that pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIID Section 5 Subsection A the existing assessments are exempt from the substantive and procedural requirements of Proposition 218. Any new or increased assessments above the maximum assessment rates previously approved and levied by the City Council would be subject to both the substantive and procedural requirements of the Proposition. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 1 of 15 67 lry WILLDAh! C. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATION The assessments for the District provide a special benefit to the parcels assessed, and the City utilizes General Fund Revenues to fund improvements and services that are considered general benefit. This District was formed pursuant to the 1972 Act, which permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing for the maintenance of certain public improvements, which include the facilities existing within the District, as those improvements provide a special benefit to parcels. The City Council reviews the current and projected years' costs for the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of the District facilities and sets the assessment for the ensuing fiscal year, which runs between July 1 and June 30. A DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT A. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND SPECIFIC AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the boundaries of the City. The Diagram of the District showing the exterior boundaries has been submitted to the City Clerk at the City and is included by reference. B. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT As applicable or may be applicable to this District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following: • The installation or planting of landscaping. • The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 2 of 15 68 lry WILLDAh! • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section. Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to: • The cost of preparation of the Report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the Riverside County (the "County") for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements; • Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment. The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: • Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 3 of 15 69 lry WILLDAh! C. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT The District improvements are the operation, servicing and maintenance of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities, including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services described as follows: • Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities include, but are not limited to, landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, sidewalk maintenance and appurtenant facilities, located within the public street rights -of -way, medians, trails, and dedicated street, drainage or sidewalk easements within the boundary of the District. • Lighting and Appurtenant Facilities include, but are not limited to, poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, controllers and appurtenant facilities as required to provide safety lighting and traffic signals within public street rights -of -way and easements within the boundaries of the District. • Maintenance is defined as the furnishing of services and materials for the operation and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of landscaping, public lighting facilities, or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; and the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. • Servicing is defined as the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. The plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are by reference made a part of this Report. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 4 of 15 70 lry WILLDAh! A. GENERAL The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements that include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in this District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS Properties within the District boundary are found to derive a special benefit from the improvements provided by the District. These properties include single family residential, non-residential, vacant residential and non-residential, golf courses, agricultural and hillside conservation properties, vacant and remote non-residential and rural and estate residential properties. Special Benefits The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each assessed parcel receives special benefit from the improvements maintained and funded by the assessments, specifically, landscaping and lighting improvements installed in connection with the development of these parcels. The desirability of properties within the District is enhanced by the presence of well - maintained landscaping and lighting improvements in close proximity to those properties. The annual assessments outlined in this Report are based on the estimated costs to provide necessary services, operation, administration, and maintenance required to ensure the satisfactory condition and quality of each improvement. The special benefits associated with the landscaping improvements are specifically: • Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 5 of 15 71 lry WILLDAh! improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties within the District providing a positive representation of the area. • Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping. • Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, and dust and debris control. • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well -maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well -maintained surroundings and amenities. • Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise. The special benefits of street lighting are the convenience, safety, and security of property, improvements, and goods, specifically: • Enhanced deterrence of crime — an aid to police protection. • Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways. • Improved visibility of pedestrians and motorists. • Improved ingress and egress to and from property. • Reduced vandalism, damage to improvements or property, and other criminal acts. • Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss. • Increased promotion of business during nighttime hours in the case of commercial properties. The preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District. C. METHODOLOGY Pursuant to the 1972 Act, the costs of the District may be apportioned by any formula or method that distributes the net amount to be assessed among the assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements. The special benefit formula used within the District should reflect the composition of the parcels - and the 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 6 of 15 72 lry WILLDAh! improvements and services provided therein - to apportion the costs based on estimated special benefit to each parcel. The cost to provide maintenance and service of the improvements within the District shall be equitably distributed among each assessable parcel based on the estimated special benefit received by each parcel. Equivalent Benefit Units To equitably spread special benefit to each parcel, it is necessary to establish a relationship between the various types of properties within the District and the improvements that benefit those properties. Each parcel within the District is assigned an Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") factor that reflects its land use, size and development, or development potential. Parcels that receive special benefit from the various District improvements are proportionately assessed for the cost of those improvements based on their calculated EBU. The EBU method assessment for this District uses the Single -Family Residential parcel as the basic unit of assessment. A Single Family Residential ("SFR") parcel equals one EBU. Every other land -use is assigned an EBU factor based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific land -use and relative special benefits compared to the Single -Family Residential parcel. The EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefits to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of land use type, size, and development. The following table provides a listing of land use types, the EBU factors applied to that land use and the multiplying factor used to calculate each parcel's individual EBU for each improvement provided in the District. During the formation of the District, a methodology was developed to calculate the EBUs for other residential and non-residential land use parcels, which are outlined below for reference. Every land use is assigned EBUs based on the assessment formula approved for the District. Parcels which have been determined to receive greater benefit than the SFR parcel are assigned more than 1 EBU and parcels that are determined to receive lesser benefit than SFR parcels are assigned less than 1 EBU as reflected in the Assessment Methodology. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 7 of 15 73 lry WILLDAh! Single -Family Residential The City's General Plan allows up to one acre of area for subdivided residential lots. The subdivided single-family lot equal to or less than one acre in size is the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. Parcels less than one acre in size zoned for single-family residential use are assessed one (1) EBU. Multi -Family Residential Multi -Family Residential parcels are assessed one-half (0.5) EBU per unit. Non -Residential The factor used for converting nonresidential is based on the average number of typical single-family residential lots of five per acre. Therefore, non-residential parcels will be assessed five (5) EBUs per acre with a minimum number per parcel of one (1) EBU. Vacant Residential Parcels defined as single family residential parcels less than one acre and having no structure will be assessed 33 percent (33%) of a single-family dwelling, or 0.33 EBU per parcel. Vacant Non -Residential Parcels not considered single family residential parcels less than one acre and having no structure will be assessed based on acreage. The typical development in La Quinta occurs in increments of twenty (20) acres or less. The first twenty (20) acres of a Vacant Non -Residential parcel will be assessed at a rate of 33 percent (33%) of developed nonresidential properties, or 1.65 EBU per acre or any portion of an acre. The minimum number of EBUs per parcel is one (1) EBU. Any parcel of land greater than twenty (20) acres is considered open space and exempt from assessment until such time as parcel subdivision or development occurs. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 8 of 15 74 lry WILLDAh! Golf Courses Properties identified as golf courses will be assessed a rate of 10 percent (10%) of the developed nonresidential properties, or 0.50 EBU per acre or any portion of an acre. The minimum number per parcel is one (1) EBU. Agricultural Properties identified as agricultural will be assessed a rate of 5 percent (5%) of developed nonresidential properties, or 0.25 EBU per acre or any portion of an acre. The minimum number per parcel is one (1) EBU. Hillside Conservation Parcels located in areas zoned Hillside Conservation per the City's Official Zoning Map will be assessed on the basis of allowable development within the Hillside Conservation Zone. The parcel will be assessed as one dwelling unit per ten (10) acres or 0.10 EBU per acre or any portion of an acre. Vacant and Remote Non -Residential Parcels (LAFCO Annexation No. 9) Parcels not considered single family residential parcels less than one (1) acre and do not contain structures, will be assessed based on acreage. The City defines Vacant and Remote Non -Residential as parcels physically separated from City services and not readily able to develop due to difficult access and utility limitations. The land values are typically one half the value of other Vacant Non - Residential parcels because of the high cost of constructing appropriate access and utility infrastructures necessary. The Vacant and Remote Non -Residential parcels are assessed a rate of 0.825 EBUs per acre or portion thereof, for the first twenty (20) acres, with a minimum of one (1) EBU per parcel. Rural/Estate Residential Parcels of one acre or more in size, but having only one residential unit are identified as Rural/Estate Residential. These parcels will be assessed a rate of one (1) EBU for the first acre and 0.33 EBUs for each additional acre or portion of an acre. Exempt Property Publicly owned property and utility rights -of -way are exempt from assessment, as well as parcels of land shown on the County Assessor's records as Vacant Desert Land, Vacant Mountain Land, Agricultural Preserve and Public Utility owned land. This Report does not propose an increase in the District's assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 over or above the maximum rate established. The proposed rate per EBU for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 is the same rate assessed for Fiscal Year 2021/2022. The base assessment rate to be approved for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 is $35.60. The maximum assessment rate per EBU may not increase without a vote of the property owners in the District. Therefore, the assessment is proposed to remain at the maximum amount of $35.60 per EBU. This equates to total projected assessment revenue of $982,336. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 9 of 15 75 lry WILLDAh! The City proposes the remaining $4,189,114 be funded through a General Fund contribution of $4,039,114 and $150,000 of revenue from CSA 152. A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be established and maintained for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. The following describes the services and costs that are funded through the District, shown in the District Budgets. District Costs Personnel — Reflects relevant City Staff salaries, wages and benefits, and also includes Worker's Compensation Insurance, Stand -By, and Overtime Labor. Contract Services — Includes contracted labor, such as the County Tax Roll Administration Fees, maintenance and repair of traffic signals, tree trimming, and security service. Rental Services — Reflects funds used for the purpose of uniform rental. Vehicle Operations — Includes the maintenance of fleet vehicles. Utilities — Includes the electric, telephone, and water services. Travel Training & Meetings — Reflects the funds used for the purposes of training and meetings. Information Technology — Includes computers, printers, and other related items and services. Operating Supplies — This item includes plant replacement, safety gear, field materials, and the materials used for the purposes of removing graffiti. Small Tools/Equipment— Includes non -capital small tools and equipment. District Administration — The cost for providing the coordination of District services and operations, response to public concerns and education, as well as procedures associated with the levy and collection of assessments. This item also includes the costs of contracting with professionals to provide any additional administrative, legal or engineering services specific to the District including any required notices, mailings or property owner protest ballot proceedings. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 10 of 15 76 lry WILLDAh! B. 2022/2023 DISTRICT BUDGET For the purpose of estimating costs for the maintenance and servicing, actual costs are used where possible. However, where the improvements are new, or where actual maintenance experience is lacking, cost estimates will be used to determine costs. The Budget of estimated cost of operation, servicing, and maintenance for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 is summarized on the next page in Table 1. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 11 of 15 77 lry WILLDAh! Table 1 Funding CategoryEstimated 2022/2023 Assessments Parks ala e P.ermar� jt Fug Tfm $194,((0 ether E ,ne,fjt & 4/p C lct s Pets'otm�l 5�'and ley �tancf 0... 0 0, TQ`al,r ��son!�',T.. .....,$40 o71 ..........,,�,$2g2, p®,, .......... A"/, u/ tfi,htipg„&;Landschpe .... Citric C aster Gjus Late fvfaint�;na)��; 17;460 �ir�anclal)/1c )F� Cityuuid IUJ rn trance tiEract 1,568, t}fY 91 f 4ffft 6 ,7;2/01 Und�uefo�e�1 Parks PM10 �e�rces � 0 � �,,, �rsrrce"s` M intenarice & f air .. ti ......4�22,3f7fl ' 10(�,0Q0 4/WD LeaPrerreer ait Pafk 0 Q„ Tile ; Tr. rn €ic(arIty ruiorp4 o Y rlt'� , 0 Fr°It7�to,Urijs Park////f�� Lightirt�r�/f�s 1 0tit? „ jl erF la ,La�jdsa.,r, .......... .............. ,,, , fJ, ,,,,,. ,,,.....�...17,4 Total,con#ract,ser%rees„ ,,,,,,, ,,,, 2,z4s,050, .........$.... 7,, 04, dal Seruroes Un 4f©,rms„ $4,t7flfl 1,, fop„ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,,.(7U , Total @f1t I„ 1YICBs,,.......1 .........$4i� ,.. .........I....s,11,0�40 ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,I,,, Facifitie GI1are 1�32,20ii ��3,1ot3,, ,,, Y/ f�lale"'4Pefsff6fi a�ll�t ,s „ i ,r� ,Q r c,� Qn,;�� � }, 9..� .........� .,,,�],,,: 0„ ...... ........�,o'l �.000,� ,,,,,,, �, ,,,,,,M!Y,.i ,,,,,,,,,,,,'Tf ..... .........4,, lj4rf It hasr;15 0000 �I� ctrlc 3tr 9,; 49,t10b.., 215,81,,, PPI1 6, ,......i .......4 G 6,4J,., ............. (S00, .............. Tet I Uffr;."b,..:�rf,r ...............,500 Tra1/el Trarhln�c ` $ „Total ,TfAi0t.TrsA41 Ac: 006s Info' MArop ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Cam Ut�X� Pr�0t�X� ancf ��rut�es � � ....$1/,//40�5�,' ,,,,,,,,,� $5�2,�0 � 0,i Ye Ftngla. Y.........:......... Tot, allnforrhation7echngla .....$1 4,(iq ............ ,,,'�57�2,4 , ......sokow Plant I�Plac�,nj�rtt � ,,,,,,,a $ r10,99i1" $ p(14,00 � �10 C) 0„ i 1 00g 4p#ravIh "SUPPlres„ ... r fet 3 k1 F� ....Mat .,,,, � � � ,' ,,,,,� ,,�,+,� ,(/(yy , .......+... Total 0�. ,�rf"��II;1 ,��!„rfe's.........� gg,U9 ..,,,,$�i*�,S+,r2��,� ,,,,,,,,,I, $r✓��aY��, ,,...,, .........iN.... Small Tools / ruc�r,,ca rtal,,,,,,,, $,,bb. ...............5b(�, E„r{4i�P,me,n,E,' ,,,,,,,,�,,,,,, ,,,,� „Total,smI�,Tools� .,�u�.mriif, ,,,,,,,� ,,,,,,,,,4of,i Total, Landsoa e,&,Lr htfrj ,Bud ,,,, ,,,,,,............ 2,3i,(1Cf , ............$,789,1$A, ,,,;,,,,,,,,,, PGbfic Woks Adrinrstration 50 $� $Q ©rfitir►ct Aclinrnistratron Cit ,uicla / drhinistratron 18,(140 18 600 „Totit4lsxrf6tAdhihilstrafrgah,,,,,,,,,� Total, Landsca e,&,Lr 60j ,E / ndrtures ,,,,,,,,,,, ............ L s sA T Reu�n�e (1$ M,0b0 (150'b" $4 " L ss rr ra%Furjd C©nt' buti4rt,,,,; „,,,,,,,,,,,, 4, Tbtat 8 �� 5 4 4 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 12 of 15 78 lry WILLDAh! Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget The following information was obtained from the Riverside County Assessor's Secured Roll, Assessor's Parcel Maps, and the City's Planning Department. The land use categories were developed to classify the different land use types in the City. Table 2 (1) The difference in the "Balance to Levy" amount in Table 1 and the total FY 2022/2023 Levy amount in Table 2 is a rounding difference due to the County even penny requirement for each charged parcel. Actuals will be based on the final County Secured Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/2023. Differences are generally due to changes in County Land Use Classifications or Assessor's Parcel Number changes. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 13 of 15 79 Yy WILLDAN APPENDIX A - DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM The Boundary Diagrams for the original districts have previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the 1972 Act and are made part of this Report by reference. The parcel identification, lines and dimensions of each parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the Assessor's Maps of Riverside County for the year in which this Report was prepared and is incorporated by reference and made part of this Report. The attached Landscape Maintenance Map displays the landscape maintenance areas within the City. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 14 of 15 80 m Nml; ParWMp OAr-RA11M trWL , r, [-A* 2PkI Pamy Martihed bV (I D (MA Axijamo •asoam) F -7 .......................ma it - --- - -------- - 81 Yy WILLDAN APPENDIX B - 2022/2023 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Maps and/or the Riverside County Secured Tax Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared. Non -assessable lots or parcels may include government owned land, public utility owned property, land principally encumbered with public right-of-ways or easements and dedicated common areas. These parcels will not be assessed. A listing of parcels within the District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this Report. Upon approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the assessment information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll in Fiscal Year 2022/2023. If the parcels or APNs within the District and referenced in this Report, are re -numbered, re -apportioned or changed by the County Assessor's Office after approval of the Report, the new parcel or APNs with the appropriate assessment amount will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller. If the parcel change made by the County includes a parcel split, parcel merger or tax status change, the assessment amount submitted on the new parcels or APNs will be based on the method of apportionment and levy amount approved in this Report by the City Council. 2022/2023 City Of La Quinta L&L 89-1 Page 15 of 15 82 RESOLUTION NO. 2022 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICING LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY INCLUDED IN THE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, the City Council, by its Resolution No. 89-9, initiated proceedings pursuant to provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as ""the Act"), for the formation of a Landscape and Lighting Assessment District designated "La Quinta Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1," shall include all of the territory located within the boundaries of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to levy and collect assessments within Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023 to pay the costs and expenses of constructing, operating, maintaining, and servicing landscaping, lighting and associated facilities located within public places in the City; and WHEREAS, the Engineer selected by the City Council has prepared and filed a report in connection with the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 with the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta; and WHEREAS, the report has presented to the City Council and the City Council did, by previous Resolution, approve such report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council has previously formed Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500. W Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Intent to Levy L&L District 89-1 Adopted: June 7, 2022 Page 2 of 4 SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that the maintenance and operation of projects identified in the Preliminary Engineer's Report for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 consisting solely of exempt items of sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, and/or drainage pursuant to Article 13D Section 5(a) of the California Constitution, that the public interest requires the maintenance of the improvements, and declares its intention to levy and collect assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023 to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described in Section 4 hereof. SECTION 3. The territory included within the boundaries of the Assessment District includes all of the land included within the boundaries of the City. SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the report of the Engineer on file with the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta for a full and fair description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District. SECTION 5. Notice is hereby given that June 21, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, is the time and place fixed for a Public Meeting by the City Council to allow public testimony regarding the assessment. SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that June 21, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, is the time and place fixed for a Public Hearing by the City Council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1. Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing, or, withdrawal of the protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objections and a protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such property owner. At the hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of such hearings as provided in the Act. SECTION S. The City Council hereby designates The Desert Sun as the newspaper in which notice of the Public Hearing shall be published. MAI Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Intent to Levy L&L District 89-1 Adopted: June 7. 2022 Page 3 of 4 SECTION 9. The City Council authorizes and directs the City Clerk to (i) submit certified copies of this resolution to the County of Riverside and (ii) take such other and further actions as may be necessary and proper for the County Assessor to place this assessment on the tax roll. SECTION 10. This Resolution shall go into effect upon adoption. Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Intent to Levy L&L District 89-1 Adopted: June 7, 2022 Page 4 of 4 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this Th day of June 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT 1 ANNUAL ACTIVITIES LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Adopt the following Resolutions: 1. Approve Preliminary Engineer's Report (June 7, 2022). 2. Intention to levy annual assessment and notice of Public Meeting/Hearing (June 21, 2022). 3. Conduct a Public Meeting to allow testimony regarding the proposed assessments prior to Public Hearing (June 21, 2022). 4. Conduct a Public Hearing to allow written protests of the proposed assessment to be considered by the City Council prior to adoption of the final assessments (June 21, 2022). CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 City af LaQU �i �n ta 7FY COUNCIL IEIE'1" I G June 7, 2022 , IIEIINID " 'T'rI""ILIE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO REQUEST COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLACE COLLECTION COSTS FOR SOLID WASTE HANDLING SERVICES AT SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS ON TAX ROLLS R.IE C I IE IN ID 1""'1 IN Adopt a Resolution to request the County of Riverside place collection costs for solid waste handling services for single-family dwellings on the Tax Rolls. E E UwI"'I E SIJKMARY • The County Tax Assessor requires Council to annually adopt a resolution requesting that the cost of solid waste collection services be placed on the residential Tax Rolls. • Included in the residential and commercial recycling rates is the recycling process fee to address the realignment of recycling. • On May 17, 2022, Council approved a revised Amended and Restated Agreement (Agreement) with Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC (Burrtec) that included property tax roll billing for residential customers. F"1SC L '1 II III ""I"' None BACKGROUND A14ALYS1S The City contracts with Burrtec for solid waste collection, handling, and street sweeping services. The Agreement stipulates that the cost for single-family dwelling services will be collected on the Tax Rolls. Section 24 of the Agreement states that Burrtec can adjust the rates per the Consumer Price Index and any increases from the Transfer Station. Single -Family Dwelling 2021 Rate 2022 Rate (existing) (approved) Service Component $11.26/month $12.35/month Disposal Component $6.40/month $6.40/month AB 939 Fee $0.10/month $0.10/month Total Rate $17.76/month $18.85/month $213.12/year $226.20/year ;. Additional Residential Services 2021 Rate 2022 Rate (existing) (approved) Additional Refuse Cart $7.93/month $8.41/month $95.16/year $100.92/year Backyard Service for 3 containers $7.48/month $14.96/month $89.76/year $179.52/year Backyard Service additional container $7.48/month $2.95/month $89.76/year $34.40/year PGA 2nd Pick-up Day $14.14/month $14.92/month $169.68/yea r $179.04/yea r Surcharge for Homeowners 10% of Service 10% of Service Association desiring Monday service Component Component These service costs are not subject to Proposition 218 (which provides that all taxes and most charges are subject to voter approval) because the Council does not set rates but instead establishes a rate ceiling pursuant to its regulatory authority. The Council may adjust the maximum rate ceiling each yea r. wi , IE ERNAI I E S Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Jeremy Griffin, Management Specialist Approved by: Gilbert Villalpando, Director all RESOLUTION NO. 2022 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO PLACE COLLECTION OF COSTS FOR SOLID WASTE HANDLING SERVICES AT SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS ON THE TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the La Quinta City Council wishes to ensure the uniform collection of rates for solid waste handling services at single-family dwellings and place collection thereof on the County of Riverside Tax Assessor's Tax Rolls; and WHEREAS, the attached "Exhibit A" sets forth the maximum rates that may be collected for solid waste handling services at single-family dwellings in the City of La Quinta pursuant to a franchise agreement with an Effective Date of July 1, 2022, entitled "Revised Amended and Restated Agreement Between the City of La Quinta and Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC, for Solid Waste Handling Services"; and WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta has determined that applicable provisions, if any, of Proposition 218 (Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution) have been satisfied in connection with the matters addressed by the Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of La Quinta, to adopt as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby requests the County of Riverside Tax Assessor to place collection of costs for solid waste handling services at single- family dwellings in the City on the County's tax rolls as set forth by "Exhibit A," attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 71" day of June 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 91 Resolution No. 2022 — xxx Residential Waste Fee Schedule on Tax Roll Fiscal Year 2022/23 Adopted: June 7, 2022 Page 2 of 2 LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California M RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX EXHIBIT A City of La Quinta Maximum Rates For Single Family Dwellings - Monthly* Effective July 1, 2022 Service Disposal AS 939 Total Monthly Total Yearly Single Family Dwellings Component Component Fees Rate* Rate Tax Roll Billing $ 12.35 $ 6.40 $ 0.10 $ 18.85 226.20 Direct Billing $ 14.04 $ 6.40 $ 0110 $ 20.54 $ 246.48 Additional Refuse Cart $ 8.41 $ 8,41 $ 100.92 Cart Replacement - ( Per Section 8.1.8 F) one-time fee $ 70.50 $ 70.50 n/a Bulky Item: in excess of 4 items or non -regular collection day" $ 21.15 $ 21.15 n/a Backyard Service Basic Additional Charge for Backyard Service $ 14.96 $ 14.96 $ 179.52 Charge for additional Recycling or Organics Cart $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 34.40 PGA-2 na Pick -Up Day $ 9.99 $ 4.93 $ 14.92 $ 179.04 Surcharge for HOA's Desiring Monday Service 10% of Service Component 10% of Service Component *The maximum rates on this sheet shall apply to all customers receiving automated or manual service utilizing carts or cans, including specifically such customers (if any) at commercial premises. "Charged for pickups in excess of four items, or pickup on a non -collection day. Pickup otherwise at no additional charge. 93 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 10 City af �La Qt.0r)ta ,, 11,.,. ( � UNCIL MEETING: June 7, 2022 S 1,.,AFT IREI.IGRI,.,, GIIEIINI o "I""'1""LE: AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN TO ATTEND THE INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL SIGNAL ASSOCIATION TRAINING IN ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA FROM JUNE 27-30, 2022 Authorize overnight travel for Traffic Signal Technician to attend the International Municipal Signal Association training in Ontario, California, June 27-301 2022. • The International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA) training includes classes for Work Zone Temporary Traffic Control and Traffic Signal Inspection Level 1. • The annual training features sessions covering the temporary traffic control safety and traffic signal inspection training required to earn a Level 1 Traffic Signal Inspection certification. FISCAL IMPACT Estimated expenses are $1,365, which includes registration, travel, lodging, and meals. Funds are budgeted in Public Works - Travel and Training (101- 7006-60320). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS IMSA is an international organization dedicated to providing quality certification programs for the safe installation, operation, and maintenance of public safety systems. IMSA Work Zone safety teaches the procedures to enhance the safety for motorists and workers in the work areas. The Traffic Signal Inspection Level 1 course provides instruction on the principals of operation and primary electrical details of cabinet wiring, components, equipment, methods, and materials of signal system construction. This training is required to earn the Traffic Signal Technician Level 1 Certification. This overnight travel would allow the Traffic Signal Technician to network with other traffic technicians and allow for course study time. 95 Council may elect not to authorize this request. Prepared by: Carley Escarrega, Management Assistant Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer M. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 11 City f L a QJ i n " :b 11,.,. , COUI I II IB IET II G u June 7, 2022 S1,.,AFT I JE IPGN I,.,, GIEINID T11""ILIE: APPROPRIATE FUNDING IN FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 TO UPFIT 10 CITY OWNED VEHICLES R IIEC ' II E IN ID n 'wrx IN Appropriate funding of $60,000 in fiscal year 2021/22 to upfit 10 City -owned vehicles. E JEC LYI""'I E SQWMX1R.Y • The City owns 10 vehicles currently in need of upfitting to provide the necessary service to the community. • The upfitting required includes adding safety lights, specialty tools, custom fabrication, and City decals. • Multiple local vendors will be utilized such as Mike's Auto Electric, PlanIT, Lowe's, Home Depot, and AutoZone. 1FISCAL °1 P C' r Staff requests funding appropriation from the General Fund in the amount of $60,000 to complete the necessary upfits. If approved, funds would be allocated to the Parts, Maintenance Supplies, and Upfits Account No. 501-0000-60675 for disbursement. BACKGROUN1NAI11," S'I.S City vehicles require upfitting or augmentations to customize them to the worker's needs. There are currently 10 vehicles in need of upfitting to provide services to the community. The upfits include adding safety lights, specialty tools, custom fabrication and City decals to the vehicles. The vehicle upfits will be completed by various local vendors including Mike's Auto Electric, PlanIT, Lowe's, Home Depot, and AutoZone. IL`I""IEIR1Y A1""'1 ES - Staff does not recommend an alternative action. Prepared by: Tony Ulloa, Public Works Deputy Director Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer 97 w CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 12 City of La Quinta C 11,.,.Y COUNCIL CY IE 1FFI NG : June 7, 2022 1,.,AFT I IE IP �,� IN I,.,, GIIEIINIID "II""'i'TIILIIE: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH GOVOS, INC. (FORMER MUNIREVS INC., DBA LODGINGREVS) FOR SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM SERVICES, TO INCREASE COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22, AND TO EXTEND THE TERM THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 RITE I E IN ID " 1""'10N Approve Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Contract Services with GovOS, Inc. (former MUNIRevs, Inc., dba LODGINGRevs) for short-term vacation rental program services, to increase the compensation for fiscal year 2021/22 with $5,000 for a total not to exceed amount of $54,440, and to extend the term with two additional years through fiscal year 2023/24; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment. EXECUT1VE SUKMAR,Y • In October 2019, the City entered into an Agreement for Contract Services (Agreement) with MUNIRevs, Inc., dba LODGINGRevs to provide online services for permitting and transient occupancy tax (TOT) collection for the short-term vacation rental (STVR) program, following a request for proposals (RFP). • In January 2022, the City was notified that MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGRevs merged with GovOS, Inc. under Certificate of Ownership and Merger. • Amendment No. 2 (Attachment 1) proposes to: (1) reflect the change of Contracting Party under the Agreement per the merger; (2) increase fiscal year (FY) 2021/22 compensation by $5,000 for the implementation of additional TOT forms; and (3) extend the Term of the Agreement with two additional years through FY 2023/24. f`1SCAL IKPAcr Funds in the amount of $49,440 for the Agreement are budgeted in FY 2021/22 budget (Account No. 101-6001-60103). If approved, Amendment No. 2 will: 99 (1) Increase the total compensation for FY 2021/22 by $5,000, for a total not to exceed amount of $54,440; funds are available in the Clerk's Office Professional Services Account No. 101-1005-60103; and (2) Extend the Term of the Agreement with two additional years for FY 2022/23 and 2023/24 without change in compensation from the original Agreement, set at not to exceed amount of $49,440 per fiscal year; funds will be budgeted accordingly in future City budgets. B C III:G IR O IN ID N I YS'1 S The STVR Program was established in October 2012 and was initially processed manually over the counter via the submittal of paper applications, and TOT payments via cash or checks only. In 20191 following a RFP, the City entered into an Agreement with MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGRevs to provide STVR program services by implementing an online portal to apply for permits, make payments, renew permits annually, remit TOT, complaint hotline, and compliance monitoring; the Agreement expires June 30, 2022. The online STVR system was implement in March 2020. In July 2021, due to the adoption of code amendments, the City executed Amendment No. 1 to: (1) implement software enhancements for new permit types and related fees for an additional compensation of $11,925 for FY 2020/21; (2) remove the complaint hotline services and related FY costs of $3,600 from the Scope of Work effective FY 2021/22 for the remainder of the Agreement; and (3) add a contingency of $3,600 to the Scope of Work for additional software customizations and enhancements as needed for FY 2021/22 through 2023/24, for a combined total compensation under the Agreement not to exceed $49,440 per fiscal year. Recent updates to the STVR program over the last year have required implementation of enhancements to the STVR program online permitting software, including adding the 1% Greater Palm Springs Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID) assessment on gross rental revenue for bookings of 27 nights/28 days or less. This required the addition of validations to the existing TOT form and to create a new TOT form that does not calculate the 1% TBID assessment for bookings greater than 27 nights/28 days through 29 nights/30 days. The additional services for the required enhancements to the online permitting software exceeded the $49,440 budgeted for FY 2021/22 by approximately $5,000. 100 In January 2022, the City was notified that MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGRevs merged with GovOS, Inc. under Certificate of Ownership and Merger. Staff seeks approval of the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement to: (1) reflect the change of Contracting Party under the Agreement per the merger; 2) increase FY 2021/22 compensation by $5,000 for the implementation of additional TOT forms; and extend the Term of the Agreement with two additional years through fiscal year (FY) 2023/24 without any change in the previously approved Compensation not to exceed $49,440 per fiscal year. ILwI,IEIR.II wl, ES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Lori Lorett, Permit Technician Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Attachment: 1. Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Contract Services with GovOS, Inc. 101 102 ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH GOVOS, INC. (former MUNIREVS, INC., DBA LODGINGREVS, INC.) This Amendment No. 2 (""Amendment 2") to Agreement for Contract Services ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the 1st day of May, 2022, ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation and GovOS, Inc. (former MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGRevs ("'Contracting Party"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about October 16, 2019, the City and MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGSRevs entered into an Agreement to provide Short - Term Vacation Rental Program services related to permitting, monitoring compliance, and tax collection, for a total not to exceed amount of $49,440 per fiscal year. The term of the Agreement expires on June 30, 2022 (""Initial Term"); and WHEREAS, on or about July 20, 2021, the City and MUNIRevs, Inc. DBA LODGIGRevs executed Amendment No. 1 and mutually agreed to: 1) remove the Complaint Hotline services and related cost of $3,600 from Section 1.1 Scope of Work effective fiscal year 2021/22 for the remainder of the Agreement Term; 2) for MUNIRevs, Inc. DBA LODGIGRevs to implement certain software enhancements, at the request of the City, at an additional cost of $11,925 for fiscal year 2020/21; and 3) add a contingency to Section 1.1 Scope of Work for additional software customizations and enhancements, as needed at the request of the City, for fiscal years 2021/22 through 2023/24, for a combined total not to exceed amount of $3,600 per fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City was notified MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGSRevs merged with GovOS, Inc. and into Contracting Party on January 1, 2022 under Certificate of Ownership and Merger, and all rights and responsibilities under the Agreement previously held by MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGRevs have been assumed by Contracting Party; and WHEREAS, the City and Contracting Party mutually agree to implement enhancements in fiscal year 2021/22 to add validations to the existing transient occupancy (TOT) form, and to create a new TOT form that does not calculate the additional 1% Greater Palm Springs Tourism Business Improvement District ("TBID") assessment for bookings of 27 nights/28 days through 29 nights/30 days, imposed by the Visit Greater Palm Springs, a joint powers authority operating under the Joint Exercise 103 of Power Act (California government Code section 6500 etseq.), for a total not to exceed amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000). WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 3.4 Term of the Agreement, the City and Contracting Party mutually agree to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional two-year term from July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2024 ("Extended Term"); and WHEREAS, Section 2.1 Contract Sum of the Agreement remains unchanged, for a total not to exceed amount of $49,440 per fiscal year for the Extended Term. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Contracting Party hereby assumes all rights and obligations under the Agreement and previously held by MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGSRevs. In accordance with and for the purposes of the terms of the Agreement, the City hereby consents to this assignment resulting from the merger of MUNIRevs, Inc., DBA LODGINGSRevs with GovOS, Inc. and into Contracting Party. All references to MUNIRevs in the Agreement are hereby amended to "Contracting Party" and refer to GovOS, Inc. 2. Section 1.1 Scope of Work is amended to include the following: Contracting Party shall implement enhancements in fiscal year 2021/22 to add validations to the existing TOT form, and to create a new TOT form that does not calculate the additional 1% TBID assessment for bookings of 27 nights/28 days through 29 nights/30 days, imposed by the Visit Greater Palm Springs. 3. Section 2.1 Contract Sum is amended to include an additional compensation to be paid by City to Contracting Party in fiscal year 2021/22, of not to exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) for the above stated enhancements to the TOT forms, for a total not to exceed compensation of $54,440 for fiscal year 2021/22. 4. Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation is amended as listed in the enclosed Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. 104 In all other respects, the original Agreement shall remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Amendment No.4 to the Agreement on the respective dates set forth below. CITY OF LA QUINTA GOVOS, INC. a California municipal corporation, and charter city JON McMILLEN, City Manager Dated: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney KEVIN LAFEBER, President Dated: 105 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provide in Section 2.3 of the Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement per fiscal year is as noted below: Initial Term: Year 1: Fiscal Year 2019/20 Not to exceed $32,960 Year 2: Fiscal Year 2020/21 Not to exceed $61,365 Year 3: Fiscal Year 2021/22Not to exceed $54,440 Extended Term: Year 4: Fiscal Year 2022/23 Not to exceed $49,440 Year 5: Fiscal Year 2023/24 Not to exceed $49,440 The Contract sum shall be paid by City to Contracting Party identified in Contracting Party's schedule of compensation, included in the Agreement, for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 Method of Billing and Payment of the Agreement. 106 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 13 C i ty o �La Q t�,j �i n t.a CFFY COL)NOL MIB1E11TNG: June 7, 2022 1,.,, AFT I IB I ' 1I.Zl G IE IN DA "II""' 'TILE: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH PALMS TO PINES PRINTING, FOR PROMOTIONAL AND PRINTING SERVICES, TO INCREASE COMPENSATION AND TO EXTEND THE TERM THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 RJECQIHKIENIDKII""'I m IN Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Contract Services with Palms to Pines Printing, for promotional and printing services, to increase compensation to $75,000 per fiscal year; extend the term through fiscal year 2022/23; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment. E l C ' I""'1 IE St PI! IIII RY • Per the City's purchasing policy, amounts paid to vendors/contractors over $50,000 require Council approval. • In 2020, the City obtained three informal bids and contracted with Palms to Pines for promotional and printing services based on cost efficiency. • Amendment No. 1 (Attachment 1) to the Agreement for Contract Services (Agreement) would increase the total amount to $75,000 to accommodate citywide usage of Palms to Pines for separate promotional items, printing needs and proposes to extend the term of the Agreement one additional year through FY 2022/23. I'!' SCAL °LI IP o "I Currently, the Agreement for $49,000 is budgeted in FY 2021/22 in the Marketing Account No. 101-3007-60461. If approved, Amendment No. 1 proposes an increase of $26,000, for a total not to exceed amount up to $75,000 for FY 2021/22 to accommodate for additional and unexpected promotional items and printed materials citywide as follows: • Community Resources 101-3003-60149 • Wellness Center 101-3002-60420 • Recycling 221-0000-60127 107 • Human Resources 101-2001-60109 • Code Compliance 101-6004-60400 • City Wide Printing 101-3007-60410 BACKGF IIIN III1 III, . S' The City utilized various companies to purchase printed material, promotional items, and apparel. After research and bid submittals in 2020, Palms to Pines Printing offered the best value for the price point and was contracted to provide promotional and printing services citywide. Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Palms to Pines Printing increases the total compensation amount up to $75,000 per fiscal year to accommodate citywide purchasing of promotional items, printing needs and proposes to extend the term of the Agreement one additional year through FY 2022/23. Staff continues to review quotes on products and Palms to Pines remains the lowest price on each product while staying on brand. ALTEIZNATIVIES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Marcie Graham, Marketing Manager Approved by: Gilbert Villalpando, Director Attachment: 1. Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Contract Services with Palms to Pines Printing W-V ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH PALMS TO PINES PRINTING This Amendment No. 1 (""Amendment No. 1") to Agreement for Contract Services (""Agreement") is made and entered into as of the 8th day of June, 2022 ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation, and PALMS TO PINES PRINTING AND PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS ("Contracting Party"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about July 1, 2021, City entered into an Agreement with Contracting Party to provide promotional and printing services to the City, for a total not to exceed amount of $49,000. The term of the Agreement expires June 30, 2022 ("Initial Term"); and WHEREAS, the City and Contracting Party mutually agree to extend the Term of the Agreement for one additional year, from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 ("Extended Term"), in accordance with Section 3.4; and WHEREAS, the City and Contracting Party mutually agree to amend Section 2.1 Contract Sum of the Agreement to increase the Contract Sum from $49,000 to a total not to exceed amount of $75,000 per fiscal year for the Initial and Extended Terms. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 2.1 - Contract Sum is amended to read as follows: Section 2.1 - Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with "Exhibit B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed Seventy -Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00) per year for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the initial and any extended terms (the "Contract 109 Sum") except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the Services, payment for time and materials based upon Contracting Party's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other reasonable methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contracting Party at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City; Contracting Party shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Regardless of the methods of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation, Contracting Party's overall compensation shall not exceed the Contract Sum, except as provided in Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 2. Section 3.4 - Term is amended to read as follows: Section 3.4 - Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions in Article 8.0 of this Agreement, the term of this agreement shall commence on July 1, 2021, and terminate on June 30, 2022 (""Initial Term"). This Agreement is being extended for one additional year from July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023 ("Extended Term"). This Agreement may be extended for one (1) additional year upon mutual agreement by both parties. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Amendment No. 1 on the respective dates set forth below. 110 CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation, and charter city Jon McMillen, City Manager Date: ATTEST: Monika Radeva, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William H. Ihrke, City Attorney PALMS TO PINES PRINTING Fred Anderson, President Date: ill Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of Compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is not to exceed Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) per fiscal year for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the initial and any extended terms ("Contract Sum"). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in payments made based on items ordered and in an amount identified in Contracting Party's schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of the Agreement. 112 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 14 City af aQU w a 07FY COUNCIL II IEIE'1" II G June 7, 2022 ,IIEINID " 'T'riI""LE: RECEIVE AND FILE THIRD QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 TREASURY REPORTS FOR JANUARY, FEBRUARY, MARCH 2O22 IR IIECO II I IE IIN ID T'1 IN Receive and file the third quarter fiscal year 2021/22 Treasury Reports for January, February, and March 2022. BACKGROUND N LYSI Commentary and Summary of Significant Activity The total book value of the portfolio increased $7.8 million, from $183.0 million at the end of December to $190.8 million at the end of March. The increase reflects operational activity throughout the quarter. The portfolio is within policy limits for investment types and total allocation by type (see chart below), and is also within policy guidelines for investment ratings. Portfolio Allocations Investment Type Bank Accounts Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) City Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Housing Money Market Pool Accounts -CAMP Federal Agency Coupons Treasury Coupons Certificates of Deposit (CD's) Corporate Notes Money Market with Fiscal Agent CERBT- OPEB Trust PARS Pension Trust Total Max January February March Allowed 7.70% 6.36% 1.01% 100% 36.81% 36.19% 38.03% (1) 5.38% 5.29% 5.56% (1)(2) 0.43% 0.43% 0.45% 20% 17.40% 18.57% 19.51% 100% 8.55% 8.90% 10.73% 100% 15.78% 15.88% 16.95% 30% 1.19% 0.93% 0.97% 30% 0.00% 0.89% 0.00% (2) 1.08% 1.06% 1.06% (3) 5.69% 5.51% 5.73% (3) 100% 1000/0 100% (1) LAIF is subject to maximum dollar amount not a percentage of the portfolio (2) Funds held by fiscal agent and the LAIF Housing funds are governed by bond indentures and not subject to City Investment Policy (3) OPEB and pension trusts are fiduciary accounts and not subject to City Investment Policy 113 The fiscal year annual effective rate of return is 0.75% as of March, which reflects a 2 basis point (bps) decrease since December. The overall portfolio rate is low due to a substantial balance in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) which is held for liquidity purposes. LAIF had seen a significant decline in rates driven by the short-term bond market and Fed Funds rate, but that is starting to recover. The LAIF rate was 1.78% in March of 2020, had dropped to 0.35% by March 2021 and was 0.36% in March 2022. However, this is an improvement over last quarter when LAIF was at 0.21% in December 2021. City staff is evaluating liquidity needs and continuing to move money from LAIF into investments that may provide more yield. Average Effective Total Days to Rate of Earnings Maturity Return YTD January $ 109,420 429 0.75% February $ 117,163 452 0.75% March $ 117,898 494 0.75% Quarter 2 $ 344,480 458 0.75% Throughout the quarter, eight CDs and one corporate bond matured, and eight agency bonds, six treasuries, and twelve CDs were purchased. There were no sales or calls. Maturities and purchases are listed in detail in the attached reports. Other Notes Money market funds with the fiscal agent are bond proceeds subject to bond indentures, not the City's investment policy. Successor Agency (SA) funds cannot be invested long-term; therefore SA funds are only invested in LAIF. Lookina Ahead The Treasurer follows a "buy and hold" Investment Policy, unless it is fiscally advantageous to actively trade outside of maturity dates. In the short term, the Treasurer will invest in CAMP and LAIF as needed. Longer term investments may include Government Sponsored Enterprise (agencies) securities, U.S. Treasuries, Corporate Notes, and Negotiable Certificates of Deposits. All investments recognize both immediate and long-term cash flow needs, and there is sufficient liquidity in the portfolio to meet expenditure requirements for the next six months. L1 IE IWNKI""'1 lE w - None Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Attachment: 1. Treasurer's Report for January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022 114 A 0 = 4 0 0 .4 0 It et' 0 C14 C14 1- 0 0 0 0 1 v 0 m m to t w m 0 0 0 co 9 N " 9 9 CO CR 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 — 0 — N 0 0 0 f-� V: u� h a0 0 (D m o co 2 o 6 0 N r 0 M 0 rZ -,r 4 r,� a� o 0 c? i cl� M 0 IQ C' M Iq V! 00 cl� R cli 0 m 0 v 0 0 m 0 1� r•: m t-� (9 cl rl� 9 1? p p ;r . T �z N Mcl� ey M llY C� rll� M "t N O It" 0; rl: — I.- �RMON O0 N'm NV (D CO OD (q N - m - N - M O N N 0 U') cli 0 0 0 0 m rl� ll� Id: 9 9 0 0 It m N m r- 0 0 S:i 6 MR 0 0 C� Ct Ct c� P,� M M i. 0 0 M 0 1- N co 0 o LO 10 0 0 - O oD lq� q 'Ili � N O 'mt N N 07 69 llo� 0 R O O (D (0 v a) r w 0 O cd 0 0 0 m =21 0 E O 0 m in m m < E c 0 E at m _0 (D 2 'D c 0 (D E (D E E co 10, 0>1 QI c 6 0.2 LO m CD — m 0 ' E a) CO CL co x E a) 00 m cn 0 �4 O)o c (D E (D C E —'- 0 0 z S O N m >m m 2 E (o o c M - 0 C:� M m a o) 't E a) > �D co C E Of C W m — 'a CL a) a) z 'a 75 = o 0 c 0- m to M C m m 41) In 2 C E 0) m 'D oz - C:.0 2 LD L) F= f M in (D M aci (D w 3 0 0 O 115 y R � 3 ❑ R R a � co M 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O T 3 R j0 C T T T r T H a d d � y N R 00 O O O m 7 M O M to t0 O co M M O M C1 O m O co N � O 07 V N O r O 7 V 0 0 0 1l: R W O O O L.t'1 Q1 .p M M O W 00 tT M 7 M Vi TL IN E N N N .� N> C O 2 - a o 0 0 n CV m00o ' W 1 r R W M M O M to W tD 0` 0 N w O C, 0 r 0 N N � N 0 0 0 0 0 Li L R Q t N N= N N O t) O � O � O O O d a o 0 0 0 0 a� at 0) s r O R C O � R O > R ¢ m fOD a N N r 0) m T N .- W m 0) N 9 O } p � E N y �o co U a OI R E w > — <Ev o o a E ¢ Y a d a C O n y c d E N N M W 01 W N > O N N O M N L 7 O V O_ Y M O M O ❑ l6 } } } } U m cn o cn to to V -q M Cl) N N O G M N O O 7 V N N O tD M M D O Lo O � O tV N n M C1 .O tD L2 O Q` W 7 to .o to � O cN 04 n a v lo m M M LO 0 to � O N N � n O 0 O O O O m to O O O O O O O V � � n � n � tD � O t0 m O co O O O r A m N co 00 0 0 n O O r- Ln � O n O co 00 W ri t2 09 D1 O O N N N M M M M M 'r�-�T } a Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ,O O` N lP W V In M N N O N N N 0 0 Q O 0O 0 O O O O r O O O t1 � 0` O O O N N O M .O N In M O O M W O M N O I� O V W O` W N M N V In In In W M 7 V co N N W M Io V M N �O O V O O� N V to V 7 W V W O O O O O O O O O O O m O co W O O O O M to M 7 co �O W �O m 7 I� O M O O O O O O O O O N O to 0 0 0 LO N to O V N Q` to O O` N O` P W O` O` r W Ol m U D` D` 7 N D` C. 't O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I- L1] I- O M N �O L() V 0 0- c` O N O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 to O O O O O O to O to Ln N O O O� O` W O` U O O` N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N O• � O I� N N � � in N O N O N O O O N o N O o, O M N I� O o O o 0 0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N C C C C C C C C C N a m m m m m m m m m a a a a a a a a a g R N N N N N N N p � U U U U U U U J U E E E E E E E'E E `m m�5 m m �5 c5 co p m z W W W W W W W = W z m m m m m m m m m m m m m p W W W W W W W W W W W 01 v 'L 3 V v N M co co O M W I� o u > N L o N M O O L N X� W � } LL z > wW a tu C7 W W W W W W Q W U LL M M M M M M M M M M M 116 5 04 T N V V V V V V L.M L.M LM LS) LS) L.M L.M LSD LP L.M L2) LS) L.M L.M Ltl LCl L.M L.M LM LS) �o 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 } a p CD - m0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 U" C7 r3+ ❑ N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N R R 'O I� r Oo P O N n Cl O M O V OJ M M I� r n N M O V P O N O O O M X N N d N O M O N N O M ry N N N N N O N M N M M ry p \ Q I� P P N N V iM0 0 Qr r W W W P P O N N N\ M .D W 01 P O O O al O CD CDO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LL LO N W o 0 O 0 M 'O 0 O O V 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W LM N m 'o M 0 Q d co n Lf) M m O n O N O of O W M N O M m 7 M N P w O LS"1 m M W P W N w O I� P a_M OJ �O I� 7 P 7 P BO O to 7 m mm I� N to m to to P co I� C O P N o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 01 01 M O � V LP W Ln �O �O O V I� O O V Ln O W M W W N N N L.M O LM r P P P 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M V V O^ n n n R jp O I� 0 'D r O 'O D O O D M O O M OJ O 'O D O O D O W D O 0 N ry M �D P �O N 00 N N N M N W P N ry I� M P M N M N N N N N N N O N ry Ln N OJ N I� 7 0 V W W W OJ W N W OJ W OD 00 W W W OJ W W W W OJ N I� OJ H O O O O m m 0 0 0 0 L.M L.M 0 0 0 L.M O O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O jp Ln O O N � O m N N O m O W I I� O N 10 � m O 10 � O m m O m 0 0 m O � W �o I� 't P't m m M M m L.M M M L.M m M w O P W N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO O LO O O O P OO O O P Om O� O O O� O co rM O I�M LncOOI"OofCclOCMCOOPCMMNOOCCOOCryC 0 O P w w P O 0 r O P o P 0 O P O LO M 'o P M N P W 0 O o m P P P P O O w W 0 P o P O P W 0 P 0 P w P P P P P m 0 t P �t O m P �t O f LA �t M 0' -t LO 7 O P M P �t m m LA m m P�t P P 0' -t O m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O L.M O 0 0 0 0 0 Ln O O N O O �() in O L.M O N O L.M O to u) O_ O O O O O O LP O CD 'o O O O O O 00 q Oq 7� of 7 Ln N N O P P P I� oo M N I� � of N O N 0,'D m P 'o P LP O of Ln O �O O I� r n N V I� W M P r Ln N o0 N M Ln P �O O LM N P �O of N �O Y r M O h m r LP r- LM LM 7 T M NM M P P �O N � W M V M M M LO N 7 LP N P 7 O O of o0 0o n OJ I� OJ OJ of P 'o Co co of 10 I� m 00 07 n CO OJ OJ of P 10 m 10 of Ln Ln 0 7 P 7 P' P't�t 7 N P 7 7 t P P M P 't 7't't 7 7 P 7 P P P P �+ W W E N N O p •� N� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C C C C C o p p p o p p C `m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M a 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 o 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ca >,p c C C) 0 O' N w P P 01O O N N N N O O O O O O N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N ry N N N N N N N N N N N N (V N ry N cV N 4- U) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Li }I R Q N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N L 0 t W 01 O n W n 010 M O I� LO AM M O LO n M O�t P O I� O M O M LO N O O M O [V O O Q O O N\ N\ O O O [V M \ M N M O O CL 7 W 01 N N N N M0 �O �O N M M M N M N N N N M �o M 01 01 O 'o a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m s � R c � R > R Q m O_ Q O O O O O O O O Y Y Y cc Y ccY N U Y Y Y Y U U c y y U U U E N Y N U Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U Y C C C N C VI C N C C C C N N N al VI N C N C C C C C C C C C _� _� _� _� _� _� @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m m CO Q O] Q CO Q m m m m C Q Q Q Q Q m Q m m m m m m M M m GC CD C C C C C C C C C CCC 0) '-' C 0, C '-' C C C a a a a g g @ @ a a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a a @ @ @ a — 0— o 2 2 0 0 0 0——— 0 0 0—— 0— 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 @ @ J @ J J J J J @ @ @ J J J m @ J @ J J J J J J J J U U U U U U U U U C C O C N N N N N C C C N N 0 C C N C N O N N N N N N d£° E° E E E E E E o 0 0 E E E -° 0 E° E E E E E E E E£ @@@ s@@ 06 o@@ 0 o o o@�@ o 0 o@@ o@ o o 0 o o@@ o o o@ N N W W W Z W Z 2 Z 2 W W 2 2 2 2 Z Z Z 2 2 2 Z Z 2 Z 2 2 2 2 2 W W 2 2 2 W @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ N N O N N N O d d N N N d N O N N N O N N N O d d N N N d N O N N N O a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 o m 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N � r+ C L � d E d N y N C N N O M �M P O N M I� OJ O P I� O N N W P N � N O of I� P P N V P LM O Ln 0 I� W Co CO W P O N P of O Ln P P P O O O N M M M M Ln V > C 'o N N N N M M M M N N N N N N M N N N M M M M N N N M M M M M M M M M M M o V N C o d � ai a M N W CO M r M O O P P CO M M M M M M P W N LA � '^ Q W z<_= U== N R Y W W �M Z W W �O N LQL (� Z> L.L N ;a- Q Q a y Y Y J O Z Q M O J J 1 Q Q O V Q Q O �1 X �1 ]L J��� d d Z W W W C7 W C7 Q C7 C7 W W Q Q W W C7 U C7 W W C7 C7 C7 Q C7 C7 Q Q Q Q w w Q Q U W m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C U LL M M M M M M M m M M M m M M M M M M M M M M M m M M M m M M M M M M M M 117 m Z,2 10 10 N N M M M M M V V V Lf) Ln L(1 10 �O 10 10 10 10 10 10 N N N } a p - 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m L) w ❑ 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 N N N U" R R \ V I� ` Ln O O Ln Ln Ln Ln in O O of 00 00 U N d N N N M M \ M M M M \ M M N M \ M M M O N Q N M M r P N\ M 7 0 O N N M M LO ISM I� W N N M Q IL � O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O LL LO P m O N V O 0 N Lf) o M V O O o0 O O I- O O D O O O O N O P Q d W M 00 M O LO 00 00 I� M r` N M O M M M N M I� L() I� r` r` P t0 LO O P d 7 N O P M 7 M O I� W r` n r r 7 LP I� r` OO 00 00 P P CO N M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N M 0_ r w r V LP 00N r 00 M M -ItLn 0 N M M r I� M of of P O M P P O O N O V N W V O CO I� O W M �O P N �0 00 W CO 7 I� O I� Lc1 N V N 7 r` r` O0 00 P O M M 7 V V Ln to Ln LOO �O O T - N N N 00 O P P O I� W Ln P A P; �O M P M I� 0000 M P �O I� 00 O I� -ITV O M N M N I� 00 O M 10 V N O 10 P r O �O N N N Lc1 O0 C(W Ln O M V m .O Ln I� W 00W O co IO IO OD 00 I� r r W W r- r M W P N H - - - .a O O O O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O Ln Ln O O Ln LO Ln O O O O O m O O O O d A O Ln O n N LO LC1 I� N N N r N N M I� N O M r n r O M M M N M I� 00 M � � N M m N M M M LA O O N M �O N N O O O O 0 0 Ln Ln r` O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 7 _ 0 0 0 Cf O Ln r n P o 0 0 o N o Ln O Ln O O O O O o 0 0 0 Li O o 0 . 0 0 0 M O r m m N O O O O N OO N O LO O O O M 0 0 0 O O O W P o O N N w O w M o N LO of o r V � Ln 'CL 'C rMCCCOCDM'4Lf) -I I r CDLnr-OLA 0 Y 0 P P o m 'O P O LO P O P 7 O P N 00 Ln lzr P 00 M 00 M O 00 Ln O P P o 00 P 00 P P P P P P N P P 00 P P P P P P P P 00 O v 7 V V m 7 P 0 N �t P P ��t P P P �t P P P zt �t P �t P P CD t0 N N N M m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' w 7 O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N 16 m 0 0 LO O Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m 0 Ln m 0 m 0 0 0 7 Lci .O i Ln I� Ln P I� Ln M M Ln CO 7 00 00 .O �0 N V 7 Ln 7 00 �O Ln Ln M M P O N M Ln 7 0 P N l.() M �O N N O O N �O O I� Cl�O O O V Y M M N N r P M N � 0 P 0 � V V 00 M r- P M M LO N 00 N O 00 LP P O0 P N O O P 00 P O O0 m I� P CO O m I� r r r` m m �0 m m 10 O R V V t 0, a,C0 m- P P� Ln P P P 7 0, 0 P 7-t 7 fP - P P tD N N N Vi M t0 i+ E N N p N i •� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u1 — o 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C C C 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 o C o C 0 � `m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- a o o a 0 o o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0m o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o N N N � Cl) C` C 0 O w 11, a,0 co U)Q O o o O O o o O O O o O O O O O o Li N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 N Q N r N r LA N N I� M OM 00 r n ol U M O O O N N O N O O N M N O N N N O N N co M O N 3 N In M N N O W N O N O N M V N In In �O �O 'o 0, 0,N N 6 I.L a 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o CD m (D s L) CR m r�- R C w R 00 am v Go 0o r C) N t0 LLI Cl) 0 Y Y Y O 0 C C C @ @ @ p O] O] CO C @ @ @ J J J W m N E E E N T T T T T T T D D D D D D D D D T T T T T T �cmO pC � 3 D D D J D D D J > > 7 7 p 3 JD C O O [� ] H H F F H H F F H H F F H H F F H H F F F- v O C d A (N L/ (N (N N N N (n vi N N (n vi N Ln to N L/ (N (N N (6 N L.L L.L L.L z Z5 Z5zi 2 2 7 2 2 zi zi zi zi zi z Z5 Z5zi ❑ J R R N O O N 9 Q co C � 41 N N y d N C n 00 T Lf) L 00 P o N o M LO M P P o N M Ln .O P -;a- Ln I.() T O V V O O N N N N M M O LP 10 N CO O � N N p Q Q m � a o N m Q O P P O O N �O 00 V V M M I� r .O P 2❑ Z N Q W d' m F N U S C� F H W W d 3 w 00 H W > m U U <)] O] O] CD 0} Q Q M M m M M U U U U R 2 Y 2 O i d 0 0 V) N F m m U U U w U U U U U w U U U U U U U U U U U C.1 N Q ILy Q Q Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r O O m O O O R 00 00 O W W W W N m CD 00 00 M 00 OO 00 00 00 O W W W W �" O p N M M M i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N10 CD 7 O P U LL M M M P P P P P P O P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P O U N L(1 Li) 118 �' v ?� �+ W ^� Y E^, W N � > N �C C V � 0 0 O N N Li L R O CL V a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M } p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a_ IO O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m M O` O` M m m m r r 01 O O O m N m m if> r O O U N �O O .O .Q dl O O O N O` N N N N N N N M N N N N O O N O O N N N N N M N Q d 0 0 0 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn u; rn O O O cn 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 cn cn O O m O O m cn d M N m 0 0 �O M O C` N N M R M� C` 00 D` S r m O` - C P m m r N N M M N M N N N N N N N M M N — —— N N N N N N N N M d r m m r L[1 r m N r m M O` Q` V Lf! L[! LO m O N N M V m O O O LO .O m O` O O O M M M .O m P N N M LO LO M N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M 7 V V V 7 7 V V LO LO O` O O O N O N O O m O O O V O 'O O O r O O O 0` V N M O N M M 10 V 4. N 4O Ol N O` N Lo N N N N N �O �D N Q, O, O• Ol �D N O` O• N l.() N N �O m N r r r v .o v co v o Ln c m,— ccm m m m v 4. m o C c o v occ o ccv m in v Ln m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n n o 0 0 n 0 m 0 0 im o 0 0 0 n n 0 0 im 0 0 im n M N m O M O O` �t N M M N M 7 O` 00 O` r m C, O� m n r N N M M N M N N N N N N N M M N — — —— N N N N N N N N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 l.() m 0 L.() L.C) In In m - In O Ln Ln 0 In Ln Ln m 00 L.() OD m m m 00 In m m l.() m O 00 l.() co L(J V V -Zil V V V 7 7 V 'T 7 7 31 7 V V -Zil V V V I�T 7 V 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V -Zil V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r � M L of N M O V M N N N M I O M M r 'IT 7 'O V NM m a,N I2 V � l V O r m r M m O r 0 N r �O 7 r m L[! M O m O m M O m N N N O M N, LO M a r O m r M m N M M� N M m 7 m M r m LO r r a r �O r O� r O� N O m� -- in m O O " m r m r O O � m� � N m r O r r r r O• r 'O V t M Lc1 N N 0 7 0• m Ln N r co oP m of �n M Lcl V M Ln �O �O O M M �n �n r V r r O m I.f) m V �O r O r O` m O N r r N r r r M M of O O O O` N O m N O N m M O` M N V V R N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Ln m o-- m- m Ln m o m Ln O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m o m m m m v v v v v v c c v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v c v v v v IT v v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O m r m O m O` m Cl r rn r r r r r m m r Ol O, O O U m O O m O` m O` O` O• m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O r m Q, M m w M U 00 M LO 00 U 00 r r 0 0 O• m N O O M r O O M M M M 0 0 r- [V O N N N N O N Q 0 0 (V M M N N N N M M M M O O N N M M M V �O M O O O M M O O O N �N N N N N N M M M 7 7 M O M O m U w > U = o Y a m m o c 7 N C = U C m m =v .= w o w ¢ a m 'o 'E �e > z u U om c o,/, ❑ u Y Y a U w— Y U U U m m o :E a ccm= m c m U m¢ x c m E m m `° U> u o m Y o m c N m o E w �c m z w m r ¢ o w c o E ID U m N w m m o cc° o m m L N o o .� U m w m Y N= a U cc o= o a m m> v u .- m u c U m N Q w w y N m v c mm z a c m u a £= N o rn o -o m `m —@ i `� o a o= c '^ � a�i in o' - m m m `m m U >° E a F E o= m o° c o o c o m Q o o c `o o= o c = o U m U m w Y a V)¢¢ U¢ n¢ m U w 2i a Y Y cn ?� N> ¢ z v U w LL 'a a 7 O` O` M M O m 0` Ln r C` �O r O• �O O O` O � O 0` M M 01 Ln O` t M � N N �O �! �O N o� D` E; N N � N� N O N O a d O +R+ r M N m r 7 In r P cy O` M O 0, R❑ x v C7 w❑❑ w w x¢❑ U¢ U m a x m m Y U w❑= d n N¢> x m p= ¢ w m¢ m¢ m¢ m m w❑¢¢ U U U¢¢¢¢¢¢ U¢ m m¢ U¢ a w w Y d U 2❑❑¢ U w U> m Y ¢ d❑ w_ 'ItX w m M w r v d¢ F- M m n> M M N Ol T N r M r 7 Q• M r CD N lt) In Q` m r M r M 7 O N Q` r r r l.[) 7 r V M r N O• ci O H O No m 0 0 m O m 0 0 N N �M r V r rn m rn O ON N M r r 119 Ln T �+ W ^� Y E^, W N � > N 0 0 �0 C V � 0 0 O N N Li L R 0 CL V a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N V N N N N N N N V N N N N N N N N N N N N a O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 2V N N N N N N N N 'O` O M O` m O` O` W O` W �O O N N N \ N N N N N N N O N N ,O Io r r 00 Oo O O O O N N N N N M r V V 7 Lf1 L\f) LO IS') lA 'O 'o O �O �O �O I� r O al O O O O � � � � � � � � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LL O N N N N N N N N N N N M M V M N M M M M M M M N N Q d Ln O �n m O` C, m O O Ln Ln O m O m O Ln Ln O O �n Lri O O O m O O O m O O O m O �n O M O N M LO O 7 t N M O` O a O N M M M M M M M M M M N N M N M N (N (N N N N N N N d O M 7 L W L M M M L N L W 'O I N 0 0 7 T l.C) N r W I� N O` W W 'O O M M 7 �O O N N N N LfJ .O W P N 7 L L V V LS') m 0 0 0 O BO O W O O O D O O O D O 00 I� M n r V O` N N r N N N N N N N N 7 �O N N I 0 N V N N V N N N N N N N N N O V m m V N OD m m m m m m m O 7 m m 7 7 V V OD 'ID m m '4O m m m m O m N m m — — O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O L2 m m m O O m L O m O L O m m O O m m O O O m O O O m O O O m O m O M O N Ol M M N M M't m M 0 O` O N N M 't W m m 't" M O` O O N M M M M M M M M M M N N M N M N — IN N N N N N N — N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m Lo Ol -Itm m In m l.() m m� N m In m m Lo m m m m m m I.() m m I N m N m I m m V V � V -It V 7 7 V 7 7 V � 7 7 V V V V V � 7 V 7 7 V � 7 7 V V � V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V 7 Q` O W O 'O 0 7 O` O � I� 0 7 L2 M W C` M M N N N I� r W m N M LA m O M N N M N O t O` �O M m LO LO I� O �O Ln . �O �O W Ln N LO .O P m O` O P O` �O Ln .O 7 N Ln O 7 N M m O N V N_ M Q` r CP 7 O O �O Ln D` D` Ln N �O W 7 V I� CP Q` LD W Ln Ln I� O O Lt'1 N �O I— co O M V V r, W V Ih 'O 'O 'O M h r- V r P m o o 7 LO 7 r M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O p 0 0 0: C C 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: C C Ci C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C W W Ln U 7 00 W --- m W LA W N m W W m w m m W m m m m W m W N N m n W w v v v v v v c c v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v c v v v v v v v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O` W W Ol O W W m W W W m m ol O O` O` O O O O O O` O` U Cl U U O` O` U O` O` O• U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N 'EO O` O O` O N M r i!1 .O �O M n U I� N U m w'0 O N \ \ M M \ N M \ N \ N N \ N O N N N \ \ 0 0 0 0 00 M O O O O � N N r N N N M V V V V � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � � � � � � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q CO � z � O 0 R Y E O O ¢ c ¢ Y Q O c m _ i O) m Y (d m O U Y H Y m i Y U t0 Y m e N Y �° Y o `° c c pm Y o c o o c W o c U o m w o m N Q c m a c Y C m R R Y m i c�i m o m i — E T` N R m W O_ @ c~ t0 I.i C Y N m L R iv �v 3 M o c o m R m m o �e o N [� U m m E F c% c a o o y H Y ii m U 0 o m c m o c o m E o m cv o f0 cv co Z "O m> Q R O N u— Q N N A d d Z R R Y T U m N c m W R -O O O W m C ) 0 R > T O N N N U E N N VI O (n O Q j ( (/ U E O N U U z O O m p] ` 2 L N ; N N N E E ° m m o M m m o o° m t a >� —° > as o 0 9 ¢¢ LL m a u 2 Z U z z m J a z m a LL o U a W J Q L.L t O N O Cl W O W �t 0 r O` N M I U co CDV Ln 'o � �n n r O Ln W I� 'o r n' W N M m W M W Q` D` D` O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O a d 0 O +R+ N O. W M M N M Ln m P M N O M I� r M O` V M I� n N O M N O` N m r N R =❑ Y z❑❑> L d> Z J W a} m d d 2 U` ❑ N> Y J d m a 0} m a C1 ¢ m J¢¢ U d' Q W Q❑ Q Q Tj ci ❑ m X¢ Q❑ Q❑ X Q U` Q U Q U Q m m U w ¢ } Y Q' M M¢¢ M M N a} (,J >_} .O 7 J I� m H N F U .O N O �O N O �O N m .O M I� L[) O CT .O �D m .O �O L[) O m .O M M .O m .O O O` V O m I� M n N M O �O N O O uO .O .O .O I� 7 T I.tO In M O m 'O N L() I� Q` N N O I.f! O z N 00 �O �O P 7 �O . N O ci 0 0 M 0 m n D NN 0 O z m 7 0 m N .� N O p0 rM 120 to T �+ W ^� Y E^, W N � > N 0 0 �0 C V � 0 0 O N N Li L R 0 d V a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C.j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � U N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N \ N N N N N N Q \ 2V N N N N N N N N �O M M 0 0 0 0 Ln O O O M01 V V M O 0 m 00 m P O N M iv U N I� m X m m W m P P O N N N N N N M M M M M M 7 V ' 7 M M D O IL N N N N N N N N O N N N 0 N N N N N P co O O 00 Q d O O Lc) 0 0 w x S. O O O Cn O O O O Ln 10 - O 10 0 0 S. P Ln O O in O N m 0 0 0 m a O O P O m m m �O I� � n P P� 7 7�����S M N � �O M N N P O �D P �D � N N — N — — — O O — 0 0 0 — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — O — O O O a I� 7 7 N P M N P P N M P V 7 N N M 7 10 P P P N M M V V V 0 'D 0'N N 'D m 0'0 0 0 N M V V LtJ lfJ lfJ W m m P P M 0 O a,P P P P P P P P P O O O O O O N N M I n n n n n r 10 n N r n r V O O CNN N N N N N P N m N N N V XMNN N N N N NNNN NNNN NNNN 10 m N m o m m m O m Ln m m m ID N N m N m m m m m m m m m m o o o m m N N 7 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 0 m m m 0 0 0 m O O O O m m m O m O O m O m O O m O L 0 0 0 0 0 O O P O m m 00 P P Ln 't 10 10 m 10 10 10 m 10 7 N't 10 M N N O O �D P I� N N — N — — — O O 0 0 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m P P m 00 P m In m 00 00 In Ln N N co m 00 m m 00 00 m m m 00 00 In m P m m Ln m P P V V -Zil V V V 7 7 V' 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V V V V I�t 7 V 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V -Zil V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m P M .D M S N P 7 r Ln N � r 0 r P I 'D o W P M N M � � m P P O 'o LCJ I O� 7 m I P 7 I r m D N I� m N M N O I m M O P V N N P m I � N P O O P of 0 10 N O P in O m P 7 N 0 I� O O M O O 7 7 Ln a 0 0 N P r O I- N P P 0, P P P NO O m m P O m P �n Ln M I� .p r 7 N N N O o O P P m I— O P P m m o0 m P m I- W r u) o M O O M Lt') Lf) L(7 L[1 LI'1 Lt7 LA V V V 7 7 V V M M V V R V V V 7 V V V 7 7 V V 7 7 V V R V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C C 0 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C of C� D, of m D; m Sri m of m Lri Lri of m w of w 00 of m 00 00 m m of m m mC� m w m w a, o� v v v v v v c c v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v c v v v v v v v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P P P P P O Cl P P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N 'M M 00 0 0 0 1� ' n O O O M U I� n M O �O O r- r- m m P 0 r- M' M 7 N N M M M N N O N N M N N O N (V — N N M M M O N N M — Q O I� m m m m m m P P 'D D N N N N N M M M M M M 7 V zT 7 In Ln .D P Q m Z v Y O� N m m L N M 7 t0 m > . T Y— 7 LL O C C m C7 T Q m a — •-- C (0 m Y N❑ d$ �' >' C ¢ 7 m C N �... O N u m C m O c Y LL Y u m °' N o o E— `° is Y m m❑ E m o❑ M m 01 m m m N m N N c N EO O LLLUL m c C Z O m c N " 06 � o R o U E a m R R o — o c 3 n o � m m > a` n 0 o u ✓� m m o r U1 Z U R R N "o Z -Q N 6� E N Z W N � N Q N R O N N VI VI C 7 J C C VI N O U C O E E Q N a s LL i� i� U m m V) N m m E LL Q U¢ V) ¢¢ U z U LL LL U LPL a O M �D O M Ln r 0 r m P P O m D m m O M O m t M 'o'o� r n r r r n m 'D M N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M O a d 0 O N N N 0 0^ M M O P^ M m LtJ O LD P m V N `D P M `D m R N a 2 X❑ 2 �n m Z J X D0 O} O F U U C7 2 a W X N❑ J Q 1❑ LL W C1 ❑ 2¢ m U U a' ❑ 2¢ p z M p] W N m m❑ m Q m m¢ m .D ❑❑¢ M❑ Y O❑ Q O U z> m H 0❑ O O N H❑ Q 1� N �D m O N M I� O O N m I� M I� N .D I.t) M lA m lA N N n n .O O P N M D m V M m u� N M P D m m M I� m M V D O I� O N Ltd .D m m. O O I� m �D T In N 7 �D I� M 7 P CD CD N�D P N� P 7 0 N 7 0 0 m O P P I� P U n M P M M O O m m D D O m O P M M 0^ O m O O ON D M M M M P OM 0 ^ 121 r d 0) R a. m i+ C N 0 N a CCY 1 r R 0 0 �0 Ct C V 0 0 0 4- IL i N 0 R t C 0 ° d a d 1 >A I R 1 m ! Q 0 IL U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N �O N r O O O CO OJ M� Or M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o In o O 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o O rn I.[) It) 0, O` OJ r r O O O P 00� � N oD N O Ol O O W W� 0 N O O 0 L27 r M 7 V V O M M r 0, 3. LS') OD 0, O1 10 10 10 10 10 10 N V 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 LO N N N N N N V N N N N N N N N I M W co W 00 00 00 10 00 W W W W co W W c0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 m 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 In m If) O• C� r r O W O O O` W N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O M W L Cr L w m w W w W In O Ol N of N v v-zll v v v ItI:r v'T 11 It v'T 310 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M o r M � w W V O �O P m OJ 't N N N 7 N 0 �O r In Ln r a O M M In O 'O r N N N CD�Or O• V N- O CD CDr 7 "ITV CD M M R M M M 7 V V V M M V V 7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O C O O C C O O O v v v v v v c c v v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 O lP W �O O O O N N N N N o CD CD 0 0 r O` u'1 N IA M N N M O N LS) r L(1 M .p CO �O L17 00 M M L1"1 V V IA O a` O o0 O N M M LC N N M 7 r 0o O N O O O O O O n LO O O M M Q• O Ifl 0 0 0 0 0 O O' I.O I.l1 �O O P A N M M N 1N o� rn m r rn M a M N O G O O O O r r` r r� M V M a r O r O N_ N_ N N PM 0 0 0 CD CD r r O 0 0 0 o 01 LO Lt7 m O O r I, r O M M V M 't r O r C ci N 0 0 0 0 of I.O m m7 'tM w N N M N N N 0 1 o 0 0 0 0 o 1 O O CD O O 1r o Ln u; r� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rf� r` O C O O O O O O O O O C O C M V I O O O O O O O O 0 MN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N O N N O N O N N V V V V N r n r IT O \ N 0 I N I A I M i m Ito Y _T O` h O N c Y 0 m a1 R w EO > U U U w" Oa E U m m c c U R Q C = O N N G7 (O LL U S C U C @ C O CO 2 J > E w c° w m c E t a� u m Q "O Q d O .U. N Q E2 J 0 H U L.L J> U In Vn UU U R R 0 N O O to N N N M M V V LO N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O a d 0 O 0 o U J U} Q> J N N CD CDCO r P w ;; O N m O r O D` CDU IS! wM O] M In D` M r W N L[) N OJ O• D• W � O O O O O N = N N N O N O V M O N Cc, O W V N Q O U C N C E ? E vi 0 N o a C7 Em d a o o ° U m m 2Q R N O O 2 c NO C U C E C R a` u R 0 3 N rn 0 n r w If) O, r L[1 O N i0+ Q z G1 N V 'O O` O W a m 0 omo > a o 0n o 0 r N 7 V C-"� U M P O� It1 N 0 122 co 2 CD m \� m a k� C k U, o� � k� cc 2 2 § ■ C / b / CN g£� : \ CY ■ § 2 0 2 0o § U 7 0 IL . )/ o ° a 2 J� B 8 � B $ 123 ] A N N O N � r � M N LL CY LL JLLJ _ >, N 0 O G d N C P✓7 O M r m N M S r m m O N O M V N C � . . LO LO � LO r m .O M r 0� m m �S r M 7� 0 �O 7 M r O�� N N M, O O M N O m V m O` m m O` M O N M O L L L - V r r r L 'O M CC) LO N MO r M LO 7 S 0 m O O r 7 LO LSD N N m M m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M r m M S r m m O N O M 'ITN C Ln 'D'o In- � LO r m 'O M r 0 IO m N M l S r M V V O IO -ITM r O It- � N N M O O P M N O m 7 m S m m� r r S M O N M O M M LO � �t . r r r MM m Ln "� m� r M Ln D S O m O O r �t L LO N N m M S S .O m S 7 N C 7 V zTC 7 V "O LO .O �O BO O Ln W N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � O O �M Ln Ln o o 0 0 0 o Ln o 0 0 o� o o_ Ln �_ o o Ln LfJ o r r M N S N C M M N V Lq M S S m O O N O M M O r v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M LO O 0t O O O O O Ln O O 0 0 LO 0 0 L. LS) O O Ln Ln LO O O O N N P N� M M � N � 7 Lf) m O• O` m � � 0 0 N O M M O m O N � N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M O M M N N LO O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O V O O O O Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O r 0 0 0 M O 0 0 O O O O O O O O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K) O O D r M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M N m L.O L L L.O r L L O O m Ln L.C) L.(1 m S L.C) L.() m W r LO R V C 7 V V C 7 V N 7 V V C 7 V V C � V Lf) C 7 r V m N CNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N M N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O S O O O O O Ln Ln L.C) Ln Ln S L.C) L.C) m w r M N Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O . N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O �O 0 0 O O O O O O O O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �O O O O O M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO N V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V N N N M N N O N LO N N N N N N N N N � N N N N N N N N N N m N N � N N N r J U> J Z CO J Q 0 d a Q Q 9 Z m U 2 W a~ O 2 a Q z Q Z Z d' Q Z~ Z Q J U LWLJ Q LL 0 0 0 Q Q m Y U W Y M U Q U W Li Q a F a Z U �5 Li O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M S O S LO O r S 'O r O N C S M M O M V r M S M C LO r M LO m �D M S S S S 0 0 0 N N N 7 LO LO LO LO LO LO O O O O O O O O O M S O M S p� M O• N LO V p. S r M m N .p r Z cJ > cJ J W J Q m U U Q ¢ 1 Q Q m Q J m Q Q M Q a p] } p N m U Y CC 0 0 0 v d� r 0 H 0 Q m� L'y r N S N M r N m O m 7 0 a, � W ,y O r LO m m O O r LO �O N N O 0. M 7 r m LO r M r M S V V M N S r S N M V N C V M M} LIJ r N �O N O N S S m} M r S O V N S S �O } r r S J 24 S In N O O O LO N N V m UJ O N M O r M m �O O Ln C LO LO M 1 N N rn IL 0) c C 7 C > Y d C f1] m <a N rO O ca m r 0 w r lt) Ln r N r M w O � r �a �� O �a N w uq .o a r r M Ln Ln � M N .a .a u� N u) � M Q` 7 N 7 m Ln r �a r Ln �a r Ln Ln O• N N D` w O` r %a 4` P O O r Ln Ln V r m N a` 7 N N r� N M V o w O w r w N N P KJ r r r r r D r m 2 m O r m m 2 m �a 7 m m Q` r m m m m r m V C 7 V V r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m M P O N O O O w r 0 V w r Ln r N U �a r M m O r O V O O N m- T r r M In N C Ln M N �a �a lA N In T M CT V N N Ln r a r Ln �a r lA lA Q• N M N 01 m .a a` r �O a` a` O O r lA LO r M N a` a U O O a O r 7 Q• w �O N N r N r N M O m O m r w N N 2 w 0 r Ln in .o Ln .o a Ln Ln rn r Ln Ln r a a a v a r N O O O O O O O O O O O � O O O O O O O O O O 'O O O O O N O O O O O O � O Ln o In In O o o Lo Lo o r �a N O O Lo o Ln o 0 0 N r O L 0 0 7 0 0 Lo Ln o o M MIN M V Ln M V V M M r o O` r a` w r O� Ln N M r Ln Ln .O C m V M N Cl? o r N M M M M M M M M M N M N — N N N N M N N N N — N N N N — N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M o Ln Ln o 0 o Ln Ln o Ln o r o o � LO n o 0 o Ln o? n o Ln o o r o 0 n u o o Ln M N M 7 Ln M�� M M r 0 0` Ln w w r O• Ln N� �o r Ln In �a w 7 M M O r N M M M M M M M M M (N M � N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln O O O O O O O O O O O In P O O O O O O O O O O O N Ln ll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO IO 0 0 0 0L' O O O O O O Q` r Ln m w m w w m w w w m� w ol w m w w Lo w w 10 10 i 0 m w o; w w Ln w r w� w� v v a v v 31 v v w o` w v � v v 'r v m om 31 v v o` v v � v v o• N N N N N N N N N N N �� N N N N N N N N 7- N N N N N N N N N N N O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln in w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0` O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0` r Ln Ln w w w m m m m m m m o, m m m w m m m m .o �o Ln m m m o` m m Ln m r w m w a -IT v a v -IT v a a v a m o, m a a a v v a v -IT rn a• v It, a a o` v a a a v v rn C N N N N N N N N N N N C 7 V N N N N N N N N V 7 N N N N 7 N N N N N N C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln m m m m Ln w m w w o 0 0 m m w m Ln Ln m m O o Ln Lo m m O m w Ln m r m 0 o 31 o O O V C R V V 7 7 V o 0 7 V V 7 O V V C 7 V V o M N N N N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N N N N N M M N N N N M N N N N N N M U m O W 2 H_j U` m CC z 2 H O Q () � a Vl Z N U CO Z d' z W Z Q (D Z N a' W W U Z a' � J J J H r K H Z� Z Z J F~ Q Z U U N LU C�>� df m O W W J Q Q O Lu O 2 V% (n W CC W a 0 Q O Q N r J> W W H 2 F O W 2 Z Z CO 7 U W Z > Z U - U� D m d W J W U Q N U= Q LL O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a` O N C 'o Ol O N M'�T M r w a, O V M 'a m o` O N R M 'O r w P O N M M 0 Ln .o �o �o �a �a �o r r r r r r r m r m m w w m m rn o: rn rn rn rn o` rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL N N N N N N � O 47 = d Ln m N �a r a, M N Ln m M M N 0` N r Ln Ln Y<�> Z m X Y Q ?X ip�m Y x N< Q 0>< J J p} -j LLJ� Q W Q Q U Q Q X LL U U m Q X Q Q m 0 0 0 U d U Q> Q 0] > O Lo M 0 LL N N N m N w m coan N r O �a �O Q CN Ln M w Ln O �O W w L'zr O N r D` V Ln 0 0 Lc w r O w M M .O N Ln N w V N Ln O M O -V r Ln p 3 N Ln M O r V Lno O �O Q` D` C M N Ln r .O N c c r N Ln �O D` C M .O D` 7 LL C N O O r Ln m M O O P N N lC) m 4 'a O M N N P N r M M O �a co" r �a U N �O r Ln �a lA O �a O` � M 0` M D` .O �� C Ln N A P r r N lA M � O m N r M 1 � ' 2 5 � lf) I� C M I- N N N W P N M u'f M .O N O O P O O O O W M O M Ltd M O O N N Ln V Ln P P 'O 'O N W O O W Ln M W Ln Ln P O P I� O O 'O I� r N N N m O P W 'D'D M m O P .O N V M M M U rvi a `o Q a � n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M .O .O O M D 'O m In n C M- n M r O r M M r�� M O r n h 0 I- C W V C I N N N m a,N M lA M 10 N 10 � P 0 0 0 0 m M O M I N� �t� N�� V I LO Ln O O O P O 0 0 LO m Lo O LO Ln O LO r O O O O m 0 0 P M P P m m m LO Ln �O I� N N N—. N N- � 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 Lc7 I� Ln O Ln in 0 0 0 0 0 P O O O W 0 0 P M P P m m m �O BO O I- N fN N — N N — 0 0 Lf1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V Ln O O O rl�O CO Cn LO 0 0 Ln O O LO fV O O r LO Ln Ln � rl:� P P m P m Lq �*p O P � Cll LO I- M I- P P W P m Lq I- P LO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O x O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O M N O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O M 0 0 0 0 0 V I, O O M n O 7 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N O O O m m m m P P m P P V In m P m P m I.() m M N m N 10 m I.[) I.[) m m W P m m P P m m m C 7 V V P 7 V V P 7 V V C � P P C 7 O C P O` V 7 � V V C W P V P P V V C N N N N N N N N N N N N �� N N MN N P P N N N N N N P P N P P N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O M O O O O O O O O O W O O O O O O m m co co P P m P P'ZI m m P W P m m m P m N �O m Ln Ln m m m P m m P P m m m C 1 V V P V V V P 7 V -ZT C 7 P P C 7 m lO C P P V 7 V V I:r C m P-ZT P P V V C N N N N C N N N C N N N N N V -ZT N N P m N P P N N N N N N P P N P P N N N r -- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O :� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O " M N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O 0 O O M O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O W W m m O P m P 0 7 Ln m P W O O LO m M N m O O m I.O LfJ m m m O O m O O m m m C R V V O 7 V 7 O 7 V V 7 7 O O O 7 O O V 7 7 V V 7 O O V O O V V C N N N N M N N N n N N N N N M M N N M N N O p N N N N N N p O N O O N N N W W J� < Y U m 0 Q N W >> l~/1 Y U D U U o a W a z z o m m z N Q m> C7 O z U cc m m Y (n O LUL H N Q m w F H U U Q Y H< F U< V) O> W L� N LL W LL LL CC Z~ N fn N W W Z O Q (n Z W Q (n ¢ J d LL d � a U U LL LL J m m m LL LL V) �� J Y 0 D LL �: LL LL LL 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C I� W col N M V Ln r W O M V m' n W P O N �O I� W P O O O O N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M 7 LO LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � O G7 d p d N> d 2 N Q= X Y °� m M X J m X> Y U> Q H O U~ F u' Co O U p 2 m Q F¢ m C U U N a 2 O m p M z Q Q} W¢ Z m m m F 0 U m Q M X LL m J m 3:> N W .O N t N N t m O W W O N M O U' W I� O O M m N N W P M 1p C O N n M M m O m- n : M M M L - n M M O P O N m M M M M m N N 'O O M O W I� N 7 In C 'O M M P 'O P N .O M M V I� m N I� N M P M M .O P _ LL O M 7 M M 11J N lA M M C �O lf') } M O M P P —- O N 126 O Ln M 1� M r P M P I� M M M M Lfi O O UJ M M M m �O �O In n P M P M M M P M 1 0) d C 7 C > Y d C f1] m M 7 M Ln T O D` P LP N N N m m O O D` M N Ln m� M M M M V O m N N N M M Ln O 0 0 0 O` L r m .O M N m N N m N L N N r M N O� m M M M O M r M M M M r ry r r r Ln r O` m � V ry M ry�� M O M ry M M M M m O O m m M O O M L.n Ln m C 7 M M M M M M M M M m N N N N N O N O O m r N r 0 0 0 M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N NM N N N N N Lt'1 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M 3' M l T O s O` l N N N N N 0,0 O` M O` N LO N ON M M M M V O m N N NM M In Ol 0 0 0 O, Ln r m 10 M N m N m m N In N U N r M N O� m M M M O M r M M M M M M M M N N N N M M M IN N M m N r rn N r M N N N O N O O N r N r 0 0 0 M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N Ln N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M s s 7 7 r r O O O O s 7 Ln Ln O O O O o L27 O O O In Ln O Ln O o Ln O CS O Ln o Di W o O O O O O O O O �O O O O Ln O N M M 'I: C N M O N N N 0 0 m O C 7 O O O M L() LS) � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 u7 0 0 0 Ln ci In O Ln O O to O Ln O LP O Ln LP O O N O O m m 0 Ln O O O O O O O O O .O N M 'j: M N N M N O I11 Ln M Ln Ln Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O of Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O m LP In m m m m m m m m m N LO m O` m m I.[) m O O� s O O m m m m O C 7 V V C 7 V V tzr V C � V V C 7 V V C 7 V V 7 V O O, s O O C 7 V V O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O f M M N N N N M O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m O O O O O O O Lo m Ln m m m m m to to m m m m m m m m Ln m Ln m U m m Ln m 0 O` o,O O m m m m 0 C 7 V V C V -IT V C 7 V � C 7 V -ZT C 7 V V C V V V 7 V V O P s O O C 7 V V O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O C 7 L M N N N N m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (= O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln m In m m m N N Ln Ln m m m m m m m m Ln N Ln m P m N Ln m 0 0 0 0 o m m m m o C R V V 7 7 V 7 C 7 V V 7 7 V V C R V V 7 7 V V 7 7 V O O O o o C 7 V V O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O M M to M N N N N M Z J> N r W Q m O H Y V)� w W� O m Q H m U O> a? n z Q U o 2 Q C° m O g N? m m m m a N Q J Q Z 0' L�L� U CC O o X F- a J N O g U J a W r r (� ~ r J U J U J S d J~} W 2 U a x Q W z d' d' W LJJ U J Q W Q 2 Ln In J (n 2 LL 2 LL 2 S IT Y Z 0-' U fn In Q Q Ln Q U H (n H z m 7 z Q U a m U H—— LL LL LL LL LL LL U Q fn m LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C N M V Ln 'O r m Ol O N M 7 M 'O r m IA O N M V 'O r m O` O N M C M 'O r m in Ln M M Lo Ln M Lo .o 'o 'C .o ,o .o .o 'o r r r r r r r r m co m m m m m m m LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N !V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (N N N N � O 47 d W c7 o LL U x LL W x m U o d o Ln N x 2 CJ Q O J a a 0 N m a N= z N o Q Of Q m m m Q LL Q m U LU Q m-) m .O a m O Q Q O M Y O S Y S o' Q a a m Ln o o t m NN LtJ OM M m 7 o M 7 m Ln .}O N m mr N r O W Q W Q o' Z m ON 'T r O M V O O r 0 o M o w cO c M O M O m N Ln m 3 Ln N U V r N V Ln r m V S O N Ln O O N O m s O M M M M M D` � N� M = LL r r r N O V Ln N m O P O r Ln LP N O Ol m C r N N M Ln N g N V �O � J r m m O O m O m O m �O O O` O N .O O 7 M M M D` M M M M M M O m O M 1 0) c C 7 C > Y GI 00 f1] m I� O O O m O I: O r n N V Lt7 D` M O !b n O P n n n O W M M Ln O .O O M O L N O N LA M O N LA O L O M zt O O M M M O D O N O x N V of O I 01 r n O V c W P L O` O O V 'O N O N O O LC LL� 0 0 W Lf1 Ln V M NC W C IN N M r N N N N -N � M N N N -N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I r N V L 0, M O IT C r O r V o a,r T I� t` O W M M Lo O C O M O L[J N O O lA L M O N L O In O M P N� P V O O M- M M o ��N O I� M L(J Ln N �C N O O Ln c, N e- Ln N N N — O O C2 Ln L2 M N O cN c N C N N M r N r N N N M N N N M .0 M MO O` O t 2 0 P O CY, N 0 0 O• 0 0 0 P C V M O O N O O O M V V 'o C � N 0 0 0 LD 1. LrO I� W 7 O I� C O O r rn r r Lo P Ln O Ip Ln O Ln Ln Ln Ln O O O O l.() l.(i V Lq M M LC M L() Lfi M L(') ML(') M� M M N 7 P P M I� n Lt'1 I- n r r r W O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 o Ln Ln o 0 0 o Ln o 0 o Ln O Ln Ln o 0 0 o Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO N N LO r� r O O LI? Ii Lc? O O n O n n C( O lP O o? Lc! O O Ln In In LS') O O O O LC LC 7 LA M M �O � Ln I.f) M LC L(J l.f) M LC M M N LA � O� M n Lf) n n n n n W O O P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O —— O 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O O O Ln O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O W O O O O O O N O 0 0 rn L6 O O Ln O I� O O O O m m m O O O O O O M O O O c� 0 0 't 0 0 0 0 w O O m N m c� N n O O O O I- N N <M V O O C O lC O C O P M 7 c LIZ 0 0 0 - O O O Ln O V O M O O O O IT IT IT W O o o o W o W m M r O of Ln N m m o V c� co M W W W W O P of P m P O` O o o o P o-Zil V P ol IT w O 7 V O` 7 31 lo C� of P ol P ol 7 V V C O - o� O` 7 m m In Ln t LA N N P a, m N N 7 N N 7 t IT t tc� N N N N N O O O O U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O C. O O O CO O O O Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 N O O O O O O L(J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Im 0 0 D` Ln 0 0 Ln O r 0 0 0 O L() Lt) Lc) O O O O O O M O 0 0 a,O O -It0 0 0 0 00 0 0 �O N N PC Ln N cn 0 0 0 O I� N N E M 7 0 0 0 0 O O O O� M � U Ln 0 0 0 � 0 0 o 0 Ln O� g� M O O O O of <A of M Ia, r O o O O CO O CO In Ln r Ln M I� O -IT N o0 W O ol P n of I` M CO W OT N 0 0 <A rn Cl o 0 o o rn o N -ZTN rn rn o w r o N N rn N N v rn rn of rn rn am N -ZTN N N 0 7 V V O� V Lfl lt1 lfJ Ln � LA N N� C 7 O, D` L!7 N N V N N V � C D` V � 0` N N N N O O O O 7i O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O - O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oi O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Ln O O O O O O P Ln O o0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W o] W 0 0 0 0 al 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O` N N N V 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 7 O V V N CD M M Lfl O M M Ltl M M M Lt7 N N M M M CD CD LC) N MN 7 M Lt7 CD M MO N N N N N N Y m d' Z W Q Q Q Q 0� Q Q `� m of m m CC a m N LL of F� W d' a a a of m Z�� m > J J J J H J p J N J H J z> H p d (n fn In (n F- = m on Q Q LL LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL Z) LL Z W L=L — Z) LL Z) LLLL (D Q Z) U LL M Z) Z) Z) D D LL > C7 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O` O N M r W O` O NM C In n W IT O N M V I.I) n W W O, U IT a,a, ol ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � LL N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M � O 47 .o d W N M a o N N U N U J x (n 2 X H rn U> N a> CJ F LPL H LL to Y LL} In C9 Z o N M W LL Q C7 p� Z U 0 W d [O W a> m 1 a Q Q 0 m m U m U LL Q X Q W o O Q O` Q Y Q Q X y/ U J J Q > U Q U J J U J U U U U U U > C7 W Q C7 C7 (.� Q N W N Q M m N N n N N N N N Q 0, U LA N 1p C O O L(J Ln I� O Ln In O W O O I� n CO n O r M OJ N W O� W CO CO O Ln V Lo O p 3 M M M M M M M L() M -t = > Ln m a` > m N 18 8 LL M M M M UJ M M M M M M M lA CO M C D` M M M coO� O� M 0 P M 07 d C 7 C > Y d C f1] m o? N CO O N N L(] I- N M �O .O 00 O � � � C� M O M .O K> CO O I- M O O N� V O7 M O I� 0 N 0 O C CO 7 C 4 N L(1 �O O0 �O � L(') N N CN N � � � N CO C V N N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O l M V w 10 O O I M z M 00 - N M M a, r O Lo 10 10 O 7 I M M In n P W W r r Lo N W O N N L I N M z m� N N M 10 z �O O C V V O M z M 10 M z O O C- O Ln OO I� LA O] �O N M O O N N M N M m O M 01 Ln n t w � Cn 72 M N O M o M cN In 0 0 0 L[l O 7 CO M CO O N N �O M L(J �O 00 .O L I� � lt� NM N N N C V COO N N O N M — O D` 0 0 0 0 0 Ln N N V �O P 10 O O O r r Ln r M N O O O 10 Ol O I� r N V O O OJ I� N N N LS7 7 O L7 O Ln N O W I� 7 0 O0 C r P O0 O I- O` n P N O N Lq LC) P O N N CO M M .O P N C O O O O O O L O O O O O L L L O O O O O L L L O O O O O O O O L L O O O L O 0 0 u7 O N u7 0 0 Ln I� N N N I O O O W N N N m m O I O L m O n r M O O N I� n O` Iq OO IO I— O O0 C ` Ib N I� N u7 LI? C� O N N N M M O Cr Lq .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — —— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — —— 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O W W O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O M O O X 0C� O N O O O O M O O O O O O O O M 0 WC� C O O P O O O O O O I- Ln O O N O r- O M O O O Ln Lr I� V O OO M 0 0 C Om OO O M O O rl W W 0` L.C) I.() M M W O W 01r 'o O 01 W 01 W 'O I.() O C` I� C O M 01 P'o V I� CP O I� C CG` V V C 7 W 00 C� 0` P P O` 0` ol O C 7 O� a, ol P O` 00 00 I� O V C C�00 P 00 D` V O W N � N N N N Cr O` C�C, C1 C, 01 O N N 701 01 O� 0� O` 01 C�O N NC` t t M N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 't 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O P O O O O O O O r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O W W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 L[1 0 0 oW in O D` O (V O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn O O O O O O I- LA O O N O I- O M O O O LA Lq O 00 - M O O O I� CO CO ol L7 Lc) x M 00 O m P n 'o O a, C ol o 'O m O U r � O m P Cr C 0` V V C V w 00 Ol Cr P a, P Cr O` O C 7 U P 0` 0` U O m n O� C 0` N 7 N N N N O� P P 0` 0` � C S, P O N N V P ol a, Ol P O` 0` O N N 0` O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O o Ln Ln m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m D` O O O O O O O C O V V 7 7 O O O O O O O O O O C R O O O O O O O O O V 7 O O O O O V O O N m N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 m m O O O N N m O O O O O O O O N N O m m m 7 N 0 m Z a U Y Q a O co U U Z Z Z CC F- m U m U d' CC F- d m U V) LLj U Q Z m F- � m se IL W> O In N 2 LL 2 WV) (N V) W d' Q 2 L N VI Ln V) 2 Z LL U Z 2 2 V) 2 2 Q 2 Z CO W 0-V) m U Z) Z) LL LL LL LL Z) Z) Z) LL U LL LL Z) Z) Z) Z) LL LL LL J U LL LL D LL LL LL LL LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 01 O N M 7 M .O 00 O` O N M T Ln .O I� M 01 O N M R M'O I� 00 C�O N M N M M M M M M M M M M 't 't 't � � m L(1 Lf1 LA LA iA Ln LL M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M � O 47 d01 M 0, O O V O `C) 0. O U LL 0, n J d X v O Z W CO CJ Z CD > H 0 Q U Z d< o > LL d n N N Q H D U U m m X U m U d 0 H m o] U m m N �D U� Q U LL m� M � Z J W O Q Q N U N U d a W Q W U N U N O (,) Q 0 0 aj I� W N Ln �O Q N W M N Q W N N N N Q (.7 W U lA Q (� N W C M .O LO 0 00 N N O M O M N W O M N O M OO N O N O Ln M a, N O V CO I� oO 0 Ln 3 o COD CC) �M o LL 0 129 = c) c9 O O O O O N O N N N N O O O O r- COO ccc N N O I I I I o o o o o o o I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M c10 O O O O O O N N N N N O O O O ti W co cl w N N of co O O N r O O O O cV M N M O O O O O n 119 O ' Oc M 00 M v N O O V -q h M M ccW W M SO o 0 M O tc O O N CT O M V a V r r.- n Ln m P O M In In O O ti N N O V V N M M W tb cc M lb O O M O O O O Y Ic Q A A A N J fn fn C fn fn R Q -O N M N V N C V N „ LL T � Y LO s_ O m M Q c 3 O V � J N O Q LL m 2 N (n � � O O C N C N C M LL V) LL N LL N ro C ro J O U O M M O N M h- O O O N g 9 O n n (D M1 W O O O O N N O D) LO N O O O N y~ Q O O o O r o N O o o 1` O W U, to O (D �' M r r N y, O CON [00 U) N d r r r M r r O N M D n co 6® 0 (D O) O) M n O 00 M 0)M O o (D Om (D O CO M � O O r L(Y 0 O r ® d n U7 N of O O) O O r n tD O Y Qf OO = N 'eY e( N O) Lf7 LI7 O r r M N M CO M M n O 606 M (® m y NV M w � O MN M Is M1 ~ LC) (ff O m M M <t G W � LD n LO CO W N CO 00 CO n O O N N O n r r N Lt7 ^, r n CO M r E N N N Eco mr CO m N N ® ® d h- M O d O O M O n LD O ' ® y. ie = iy LD CO co N O O O O r M ui 0 co ui of co (!i P +C� rah O 'It (o n Ln M cl! C LL ((3h0 O D O 0 o a M1 (D(OOLD C00 P 0 0. N N O CO � N r M M Qj O9 r NN v O O O O _N LD erdNOOOO 0. N M w O O O O 0 W NVLOND yd n M ti O O OO- OM OPMS OO� OwD LD tD D n LD O 0 N W N M OS M1 M M r C O N = Q U U-c U y {Qp a E o o N o Y N L_ 2 W C C O 2 r IL C U U Y O Z Y D. Q) C c (p tT U (`p o C d d E rn rn CL d 4 E y d m U yC U U c0 "aN c co J -1 5 LL h U U� U n. ii N L c ro OU c U _ ro c 21 ca o E U 0) � N u O O M � C O cn N ro J ~ O V N t7 � a �- `c U) O C E`c O > E C X X U c L_ N m 6 C UE N O E O c E LO N 1< > N M_ 09 O O (O M N C C C c O W N O N E rro rn ro a) c N N > ro O O � N � E _a ro O ro > C > Y V) M ro c P E cD ct (O (D N r' N N w N O N COEmc O y O C Q) N :O O. � U � O '— O 0c � C O N � N O �LTro d f0 N U E w U) U 7 V f0 > O @ Q a A CO O N U y fA •� t6 N N m E > > �o U Q W U N U 131 y R � 3 ❑ R R a � co M 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O T 3 R jp C T T T r T H a d d � y N N M M P O to co OJ w O O N P N u O o u r 7 O O L[1 M O Y N M M P O m co tb O QI O N P -w C.4 0 _ _ 7 R O I� O �1 M OM O w s V OM m ifl V CY 1 � N` R N M M P O wr M fn a o a s n G L � 0 0 d o V LL O= N w O a,O r O N N 4- U) 0 0 0 0 0 Li L R Q t N N= N N d a w o 0 0 0 w d N V r Ln m C w R tD > m O N r N � T N W c0 N N 9 y OI E ¢ Y a d a C m m U in - O n y c d E N N M W P CO N O N L 7 O V co N Q P CA O_ Y M O M O ❑ l6 } } } } U m cn o cn cn cn w w n r- N N O 0 W N O O 7 V N N O tD M M P to Lo O � O tV N r ti M C1 .O w L2 O P o to 7 to r04 ti � Iq lo to M M LO P to N N r � O O O O O O � O O O O 0 O O O V Ci N N O w O O t0 m O co w O O V " O O N N O O tb w � n m In N co w O O N N O O co O G n I� Ln Ln w w N R M n w O O O N N N M M M M M 'r�� } a Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ,O P N LP M V LS7 M N N O N N N 0 0 Q O 0O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O LL � P O O O N N O M .O N In M O O M M O M N N P D O M M 0 7 V OD M Ln n N 20 C N NIXJ M N M V Ln LS") �O I� M Io V M N D O V O P N V to V � 7 W V W O O O O O O O O O O O m M O co coof O tD O O O M in 7 � � m 7 r O O N N O M O O O O O O O O O N O m 0 0 0 LO N to O V N P to O P N P P w P P N P m P P P P P P N P P P P P P P 7 N P C. 't O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N in T CO M O in I- P P P M M M 7 Ln M N O P O O O P M P O O P O 0 0- P a in N O A P in O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 to O to Ln N 0 0 0� P O P P W P P O P N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N O N O N O O O N o N O o, O M N I� O o o o 0 0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N C C C C C C C C C N a m m m m m m m m a a a a a a a a C a g R N N N N N N N p � m U U U U U U U J U E E E E E E E'E E `m �5 m m �5 c5 co p m z W W W W W W W = W z m m m m m m m m m m m m m p W W W W W W W W W W W H v 'L 3 V v N M co co O M W I� o c.i V N L o GI M O O to N 0'W � } LL z > wW a tu C7 W W W W W W Q W U LL M M M M M M M M M M M 132 LLB' 04 >, d v v v v v v Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u) Ln Ln L(l Ol Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln 10 10 10 10 .O 10 10 10 10 d O CD - 10 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U" 07 r3+ ❑ N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U R m 'O I� r W P O V M O V W M M I� n n N M O V P O N O O O M W N d N O M O N N O N N N N N N O N M ry M M N O N V M O O 'D I� r W W W P P O N N N\ M .O W P P O O IL O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LL LO N W 0 0 �O O O Ln O 0 D 0 7 0 0 0 0 N o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Ln N Ln 'o M Q d co M n m M m I� O n O O N O W O W M N O M 10 m M N P W O LO m M N P W N W O d W �O I� 7 P 7 P I� 7 LD .O LD .D 7 m m m m I� N �tl .D Ln LD LD P W I� P O P 7 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0— 0— a .2W M W M D O r W W N O P N N 'D O In 0 0 7 M V V N M V P V W P P O M M O D D 0 0 M V 0W P O M PO N mI� W O N W P P P 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N M M M M M M M 7 V V V LC) .D .D .D .O r1 R jp O r O D O O O O M D O M W 'O D O O O O O W O O I� �D N P W N N N M N W P N N I� M P M N M N N N N N N N O N N Ill W W I� 7 0 V O W W W W W N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W I� H .a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ill Ill O O O O I.c) m O O O Ill Ill 0 0 0 Ill O O O O O O O O O O O j0 m 0 0 <N � O m O N N O W O W I� O N m O D I� O Ln m O Ln 0 0 mO W �O I� 't P 't W O P W N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L(J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I.f) O Ill O O O O P O LA mC O P O I.f) O P T "O O� O O N O O Il) O Y O M Ln I� c N O O O r I� O W O W O O O O I� P P M M N 0 V 0 0q O O O N O C C C C 0 C 0C P W W P O O 0 O P O P O O P O L(J M 'D 0, O O O o O M W P co �O O a, a, a, P O O W 0 W O P O P O P W O a,O P 00 P I� P P O O O o O P P P a, a, W m t 0, � O ma, C) 7 O't m M 0' � Ln t O� P M P � 7 Ill Ln m Ln Ln P P P P �t m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Il) o .D CD C)O_ O O C)O N CDL[l _O LO C) CD m O Lc) 0 0 00 O_ m_ � N ID mIzr M M m Lrl 7 P Wm O O M P N LO Izr O OD Lcl O O O Ln I� r Ln ON V V O N N N �O M O 'O W 7 P IS) P 'D W P N 7 W L(l 'O 7 W 7 0 O o Y M P M M P 'ItW 0 V P N Eo; P 0 W W P W �O N co V r, V P P P P o W I— r 7 co O P O W WC) C) W D W W W W m m m W m W W m Lc) .D 10 I.n -t 0 7 P 7 0' O P a 7 N P 7 t �t P 7 P M P't 7't�t 7 7 7 P 7 P P P 7 i+ y I em O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 •� C N 7 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C `m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rf C) LL 0 O N w P C, a,O O N N O O O O O O N O O O N O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O Li }I R Q N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N L O t M O LA I� n n M O O M O N N N O O 0 0 \ N 2V \ 0 0 O N M \ \ N M O 7 W ON N N N N In �O �O �O �O N W W W NM N N N N MO W 6 OO I.L a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m r m R c � R > R Q m Q Q Q Q fl_ a Q Q O O O O O O O O c C C C N C @ @ @ ¢ @ ¢ @ @ ¢ @ @ @ @ Q Q ¢ Q Q @ Q @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m m m m m m � m m m m �� ��� m m m m m m m m C C � C a a a g a g @ @ @ "0 "� @ @ @ @ @ @ m @ @ @ @ @ @ "� "o @ @ @ 2 2 2 2 o o— 0 0 0 0 0——— 0 0 0—— 0— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U @ U @ J J @ J U U J J J J @ @ @ J J J @ @ J @ J J J J J U U J J J L L L L L L C C L d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 N N E E£° E° E E° E E E E E E E o o_o E E E'° E° E E E E E EEE @@@ s@@ 0 o@ o@@ o o o o@@ o o o@@ o@ o 0 o o o@@ 0 0 0 N N W LL LL Z LL Z 2 2 Z 2 LL LL 2 2 2 2 Z Z Z 2 2 2 Z Z 2 Z 2 2 2 2 2 LL LL 2 2 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 0 L 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 L 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 L N 0 0 N N N O d d N N 0 000 N N 0 0 N N N O d d N N 0 000 N N N 0 N a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 o m o 0 o m o 0 o a a o o a o 0 o m o 0 o m o 0 o a a o o a o 0 o m W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N � r+ C L � 41 E N N N r C N N Ln O M LD P O NM I� co O 0,I� O N N W P N N O co I� a, P N V P Ln O r' r W W W W a' W 0' W O �O Ln 0' C)' Cy' O O O NM Ln MM MM MM M C �D N M M a N C O U V N C O d Q> ¢ w z D} m N m a>> Wi X X c7 N a o N N rn X 2 v V N R d W ¢ N M _= y/ W W m z W W .O N LL :E z> LL N V= Q IL 0) Y Y J O Z Q d CJ 0 J J¢ Q O¢¢ O �1 Q X �1 �1 J d d w w w c7 w C7 ¢ ¢ c7 c7 w w ¢ ¢ w w w w C7 c7 c7 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ w w ¢ ¢ c7 R m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C U LL M M M M M M M m M M M m M M M M M M M M M M M m M M M m M M M M M M M M 133 a' N N M M M M M V V V V LC1 Lf) IP 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 r >- a p - 10 N N N N N N cV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U" 0)r3+ R N N V O r O N Ln O O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O O 00 U N d � O N N M N M M M M M \ M M M \ N M M M M M M \ Q N N N Li') P M if1 I� P N M V O O N N M M if1 LO I� WQ ILI LO O D` Ln 0 0 0 V O O N M O M V O O m 0 0 r 0 0 O O O O O w M r m M r 0 M m m r M r N M O M m m N M r I.f) r r r CT m d N N m m m �� M M �O L() r m r r r r Lf) r r m m m O` C` r C) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O d r ` O m M M O o` M O O O p IX) N 7 r r r r oc M V a, O M M R V V V 7 LO LO .D .O r C T — — — — — — - — — — — — — - — r .o .o N oo N N N N N m N N W o rn rn o r m L2 rn m ' M rn M r m m cmN rn .o r .o m O r V V O M N M m omr m O M .D V O �O D` 0 M m m m r m m Lo O M V Ln o m r m m m O oo BO O o0 m r r r m m r r m (M LU H — — — .a O O O O O O O m m m Ln Ln Ln Ln O LO Ln O O m m O O O O O Ln O O d m r 0 m O O M N r N r Ln m M r N N N r N N M r N O M r r r 0 M L M M N L O r oo M N M �o L[1 N M M M Ln r r r r 10 r m 0 a+ CD� C)� � � � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N Lu o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Ln � r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o LA _ o 0 0 0 0 o LA o Ln r r rn o 0 0 0 00 0 Ln 0 Ln o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln . O o 0 0 0 0 o oo m m N o 0 0 o N o r O r N 0 LO O O Lc> 0 0 0 Cl) O O LA r 0 C O Ln r L[) O O 1, C O LO m O U o C C 0 M N m L m M O 10 N LA C U L[) 0 0 " 'O 'O r � r M O O m m M "D Ln r �O 7 7 Ln q O O r L[J r n 01 Y p O P T L[J O O LN 10 P Ln r Cl O O` V 10 0' r N m M V P m r r M 00 LO C O P U V O O M Ol m P U P P ol a` m P a, m r P LT Ol Ol P P Ol P m m m Cl) O N ti LT P 7't U U Ol Zt o U O, �t 7 P 7 ol U U oc r M � Lu o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 co ri 0 0 0 r o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ri 0 0 0 0 0 o ui r Lf) 7 a r O M Q` IP r m Lf: _o m m N O Ln r CD a Ln O (T N fT N M 7 7 7 7 N N m M N N r(3, M L() O` LC) V IP 7 LCl m 7 'O V m m M O` m 'O O` Y o v o o c o cm m m o- o r u c oo L(o r oo ri ri v o 0 o rn o� cv r o ui r rn r m m rn Ln o o m m Cr o r r r 00 r a v r r r r m m m r m m m a a a,rn o rn u� n n rn rn a n rn rn a a rn rn o a a a a a a rn a rn rn rn i+ E em O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O CD •� C N 7 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 — o 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 C C C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 `m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O o 0 o O o 0 o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o m n c 0 n n o 0 0 0 0 c o n n m m � n 0 n o 0 o 0 C v � � � --- --- � � 00 0 C C) LL 0 O N w N N N N N N N N N Cl 01 o` N o• N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4- N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Li }I R Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N L t N N O r O r r N r N r LO N O N r M M M r n 01 0 O 3 N N N Ln M N N O CO N O N O N M N M In � �O 0 P 01 N I.L a 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fU fU m V N Q O O R C � R LD O N O > R Q Q m In � L17 LZ LO r` Y Y Y U Y Y m m m m m C C C C C J J J J J N U E E £ E E T T T T T T T T T T T pL J J > > 7 7 p 3 J J W m O O O O O N N N N to N N N VI VI VI V1 t� N N N N N N N to N N N N LL. 2 2 2 2 2 > M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M _ M Q d N N d N N N N N N N N N N N N d N N d N N N N Q b A � b b H F F H H F F H H F F H H F F H H F F H H F F H N. N. N. !n N. N. N N n vi N N N N. N. N. N. N. o. !n N. (n N N � LL LL LL LL LL LL m zi zi zi zi zi Z5 Z5 zi zi zi Z5m N O O N � Q ++ 3 7 L En (n C � d £ N N y d N C a r m 10 a V V LO N m 0` o r N (N o M L[1 M o` o` o N M Ln .O o� o` r- m V LO V m V V 0 0 N N N N M O > Q 10 10 �o M M M M M M 3 �O M M M N M M M M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M c N o U c 0 o 0 Q r Cr LA 0 Ln N t..) M o` O` m O N V m M M r r O �D o` o m N J > o D� a O F LL U1 �, > > z ¢ > m N U= c� LL LL a N Co U U F m Lim m m o} m m m m m U U U U N o z a 0 0 0 N Q Q m m U U U m U U U U U m U U U U U U U U U U U m IL W Q Q 0 Q Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m M O O O O (Q m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O N M M M M M M L N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C Li LL M M M M M M T T T T O T T T T T T T T D T T T T O T T 134 v ?� �+ W C W N �= O N � � O 0 0 d V 0 LL 0 0 U) Li L R 0 d V a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M } p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a_ I0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q N 2V N N N N N N N N W O P W P M W W M P P M in W W W P 0 0 0 W N W W in O U N M M M M V m .O .O co W W W O O N N N N N N N M M M 7 r V M -O .O .Q IL P O O O N P N N N N N N N M N N N N O O N O O N N N N N M Q d P O O O O P O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln to P O O Ln O m 0 0 m 0 0 0 O Ln L2 O O m O O m d m M N W 0 0 .O M O P 7 N N M N 7 M 7 a, co P .O I� W P m P m m r 75; N N M M N M— N N N N N N N M M N — — —— N (N N N N N N N d I� P O O P n P O V P O .O W N N N M V V r 7 O .O M M O M .O N M M Lt'1 I� P O O .O I� W W N M L27 .O I� W W O O O M IIJ W P P O N N M N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M 7 7 V V 7 7 N P O O O N N .D N .O .O W .O .O .D V .O .D .O .O I .D .O - - .O P V N M N M M .O V .O N .D P N P N I.S) N N N N N .D .O N P P P P .O N P P N m N N .D L(1 V .O V W V O O W W W W W W 7 4. W 0 0 0 0 V W O O W 7 W I.f) 7 �) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L.n i O O O Ln 0 m O O m 0 0 0 0 Ln �2 O O m O O m .O M N m O O M O P N M M N 't M't Cl W P W P P W m r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � W LO W O�)- m m W -- O�� O�� LO W m m m W W W W - m W � m O W W V V � V V V 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V � V V V I�T 7 V 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I r r 0 0 V M I V V .O P V •V . W O W O I- W O 7 M W L L M I- M W I L CDm— M V u M O V M N P N V N O M Lt7 �M W 7 N N N �— L P N N O M O P M O N .O O P W .O W M 7 W N n n n I.(') O N N M W N P IC M M n M P W .O I� W G M W M IS) CD N N O l.(1 V V V M V P Ll.f ) P V V M M� Lo co m W O L.O .O Lf) .O P r, .O .O h N I— r r N N r P P P m m r r P V N W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln W in m O W m O m O m m m W m m m W m W m m W m m W O W m W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M � � � O I� W O• M W W M U W M in M O m I� n P O O P S m N � � 0 0� I� O 6 M M M V .O M .O .O .O M WW .O 0 0 \ �N N N N N N N M M M 7 7 'ITM .O M m N U c W > U L o Y p_ R v O O L YL W o LL ¢ o _o ¢ `m N 'E 2!o U m p m c m L z U L m Y �' Y N ❑ V Y Y -o U W Y U U U m O U L cn m c c m c m U m¢ x c m E m m m U j o m Y R cn m o E Y R z W m F a ¢ o L o E co U m a m m c o m u o m m y N o a .� U m m W m 2 c a� o o U O Y O m O 61 .... m L s C N cd X W W V, N N Y R p� m z O a L E L N c o° a ° m i n `^ N -° o E c j 2 v j� �_ c� i J m U m Li Y d !n Q¢ U Q (n Q m U LLLI � a Y Y !n > N>¢ Z> CU U LLLI ii d - t P .D Cl M M O m P .O I P .O P .D O Cl O t t O P M M P L.[) P M N .O .O N O to V 0 0'O P 0'P N 0 0 0 N O a d O +R+ m P M N m ^ m^ P m P •O M O P r M W .O O M 7 P O M .O •O M R z❑ X U C7 W❑❑ W J X Q❑ U Q U m a X LL ❑ S d (n N¢} X m❑ V Q LL m¢ m¢ d' m Q m M LL ❑ Q J¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q U Q LiJ p] m Q U¢ 1 w V W Q' Y d U ❑❑¢ U J U> m Y Q' Q 0❑ J V X LL m M J T 0¢ F m 7 m O t .D n N W N P m m of N CN P W I� a P M I� O N In 44 P W I� M CN N M 7, P N I� P I� N m I� M 0 N N P U S O O OM 0 m 0 0 m 0 m 0 0 D N N m,'T R P m P 0 O P N N M 135 Ln T �+ W C W N �= O N � � O 0 0 d V 0 LL 0 0 U) Li L R 0 C V a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 O N N N N N N N N N N N a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C.j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N N N N CDM O` I� n n D` l.() \N P O` N M I� M m L(1 �O U] .p M COO• I� N O` W m O N N N \ M N N N N N N N N N N 011 O N N N N O 7 7 7 V I.f) LnlA Li') .D O O O O -O I� o al N O N N N N N N N N N N N M M 7 M N M M M M M M M N Q d in in O �n in u7 in 0 0 0 m 0 m 0 in in 0 0 in u7 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O m 0 m 7 M 0 "O O` O N N M �O I� N � m M- 0 7 7" M O` a M O N M M r M M M M M M M M N — N M N M N — (N N N N N N N — d �O N � 1 n O r 0 � � r 7 I O Co O• M 7 m m `O I n rI'D r 7 D, O P 7 M O 0 m I� coO 0 7 I� P� P GI N M .D .O O` N m I n n m O O N N M 7 7 L l I mLti lf1 lA l.t� L() Ln n n n n n n n r W W m m W W W W m N N m ADO �O m 'O �O -D �O �O �D �D 7 7 �O �O m N Ol �O N N �O I� N N N N N N N N 7 �O N N L(1 �O �O �O N 7 N N 7 N N N N N N N N W C 7 W W 7 N m W m m m m m m llO 7 m m 7 7 7 7 m llO m m lO m m m O W m m W O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O in m O L(1 Lr1 in in O O �n �n O �n O O in in O O L(1 in O O O �n O O O �n O O O in O L(1 � M O � M O N M M — — M M M M M M M M N N M N M N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 N N N N N N N (N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ,O N O m O` N N O` L(J N N N O` M 7 I� O L.() O M O, c r r m N I� � CDO` M CO M M m 7 7 0 �O � O` I� N IS) Q` cN N O, O` N � N �O O I- Ln N cN N I.() 'O _ 0 7 0 0 Lf1 L.(7 I- 7 7 N Lf1 L.(7 M M m M O` m N O` M N N O O` N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C m w 00 m o� a x x m iri Sri x x x w m w 00 m x w m x x m Sri x x m x w of w w 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m Ol O O, U 0 0 0 0 Ol C� U Cl U U Ol Ol Ol O` ol C, U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N �O N N \ \ N M \ N M \ N N N \ \ O N N N \ ,0 O W M I� r r O O O O� N N I� N N N M M V V V 7� In In I.[) � � 0 0 0 'o r L z LL E c To L¢ Y Q m L m _ i O m Y m m a L > L U Y F R Y m N Y U > f0 L N Y O Y= @ co L (p L m Y O L U O I LL (N U o m= o m y Q L R a L Y L m L m R R C Y m i U m o m E T V) R m Q R L~ O LL L Y d m m R L U O Y a Y N m � m d � L o m m m o E Y LL z L o ,� H Y LL m U o m L o c o m E m @ o m m- a Z -o ca> Q m o a`� s °' Y ?, m N c Cp LL R a L o LL m L d 6' R > >, o a� w m U E O N N O N O U U Z O O m U E E i m m t° m m o o m <6 m o O U7 L N a> N @> o N 9 a' Q Q LL m a' H U U Z Z m J a' Z m a LL J U a W J CJ U a' Q 7 m I� m N m 0 7 N 70 N m 7 0 N O O` m 'O m 7 'D I� O` N M r 7 m 0 7 l.[1O �nOO �n .D �O I� r O �n m I� n n m M m m M O U O O O N � N N � � N N � � � � � � � � N N O a d O +R+ 7 N p. W M M N M m O, M 7 P 7 M I� n N O M N R x 2 p Y z❑❑> d> z J D LL d} m d d 2 C7 ❑ N> Y J o m a C7 }❑ 6,1 Q¢ m J Q¢ U Q LL¢❑ Q Q �j a m X Q Q❑ a' Q❑ X¢ i.� Q U¢ U U¢ m m Z M (n ¢ Q M M N a } (,� >_ } .p 7 J I� m F N H U 0 7 N N N Q A N 7 7 In U) M 7 O l.c) �O N L.() r P N N O L[) O m � N m LO A O� 7 �O 7 N ci O O M O m N 7 N O m m 7 O M 7 7- L n N m CN cN O o 136 to T �+ W C W N �= O N � � O 0 0 d V 0 LL 0 0 U) Li L R 0 C V a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C.j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N N N N N \ \ N N N N N N N N O M O, r V V I� M O 0 M M M O` O N M V V U N M \ \ N M M M N N O N N M N N O N N N N M M O N N M ry O IL N N N N N N N N N o N N N O N N N N N P Ln O O Q d O O O m 0 0 in Ln Ln 0 0 0 m O O O O m m m 0 LO O O Ln rn Ln O O Lo O Ln m O O O d O O O O` O M M M �o O• O` - t 7 f 'oM N N O• O N N N N O O 0 0 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O O O d N M 01 M M M -It O` (N Ln Ln In O• Ln V M V M In M 0 0 l. V In M O` m Ma, O O N V 1O m O` P M L 'D r M M m O` m m m O• O� O, m rn� C, rn rn O` C` 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 0 N N I n n n n n r r 10 r N n r n V O O I n n n n 10 10 10 V 10 10 10 10 10 10 I 10 10 n N N N N N N N N Ol N M N N N 7 m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I M M M m m M m m O M Ln M M M O N N M M m M M m m M M M M o M M M M M M N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O m Ln m 0 0 0 m O O O O m m m O m O O m 0 Ln O O Ln 0 m 0 0 0 O O O O C� O M M M 't m 10 ' N �t 10 M N ( O O C� N N N — N — O O 0 0 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C O C O C O O O O C C C C C C C C O C O C O O O O C C C C C C C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M O` Ol M M Ol M Ln M M M Ln Ln M co M M co M M M M M M M M M Ln M O` co M Ln co ol V V � V V V 7 7 V 'T 7 7 31 ZT V V V V I�t 7 V 'T 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V � V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O � to M I- O O -ITi N 0` O` M r r M M 7 L(J O M M O` Ln O �O I� N 7 7 V to r O O M M ,O m O m 0` to m O` � r N �D O �O I� t M M N O N N I� M .O m N M M M O O O Ln Ln Ln rn D` a O• �O Ln N N rn a O M O rn MO O O CDM Ln O I� r O` O O• m M M Ln P O CO V N 7 N N N 7 MN I� O` O r O` O` o o O` co O` m m r o r �o o 0` co Oo r r o r m r LA 7 L() M V 7 M _ O` o0 V V Ln In V V 7 V M V 7 7 V V M M M V R V V V 7 V V V 7 7 V V 7 7 V M M V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C C 0 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C Ci C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m W O, U m w Q` m Ln W m m Ln LS) N N m W W w m w m m m W m m m W 0` N m Ln W O• 'T 'T � � � � �T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O` O` O• U Ol O, O, 0` � Ol O D U O` O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N O �O M M 0 0 0 0 I� 0 n 0 0 0 M o I� r M 0 0 0 M M O` O M f M M N (V M M M N N N O O\\ M\ . N \ [V M M\ O N N M N C A o, W M O O I� r N N N M N M M M M M V zT 7 7 ¢ m z v ¢ C m m L N M Y 7 @ m O> Y .D LL ❑ Y Y Y m Y 0 N O m d m C ¢ 7 m C C m C N m C m m y c Y LL Y o c m E — -E o o E° o Y E m 7 m a m O m m c c N m N N o .�-° Y o O L` U@ C @ C m N (n @ o7J u E rn `r2 °° E@ o N U _� E LL N N V) Z m m 2i R o a �' O 'O Z a u 0 N � m m E N ;B Z Lei Q N O_ Y Y Y Y N 'O C C N @ m m o m E o m i E LL a a U m m n N m m LL ¢ u ¢ n¢¢ U z ULL LL LL U LL C` N � O M I� 0- I 0 r M O` O` O M Ln N 0 r M r M 0 M 0 M r � M O N N N M N M M M M M N N V Ln V L.(1 L Ln Ln Ln 'o'o'o n r r r n r M 'O N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M (n O a d 0 O fC d (n d 1 2 X❑_- m Z J X m 0% O F F 0 0 0 2 LLw X� N❑ �-' J a�❑ V) LL C1 U❑ 2 Q m U U d' ❑ 2 Q❑ z M m LLB N m m❑ m Q m m Q m .p ❑❑¢ M❑ Y O N a' Q U 0 Ln ❑ Q O U Z�> d' M F� O❑ O O N F❑ m LJ U` Z�� � m O N M- O O N m 1� M 9 r N In M In m N Ln M .O M V M M- N M O, � - M M M I M M� �O O Ln .O M M N O O r M �O 7 u) .O N 7 1O I� 7 M V10 'o Q`CD N Ol N V O` V O N 7 0 O M O Q` O` r U M n M O M M 0 0 m m,, O m 0 D M M O^ 0 m 0 0 ON O M M M M D m 137 07 L2) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 I� r r r r N M M .O - m0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CD 0) w ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N \ N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N m R N O O W W M� O` r M;r O0 Ln W d O N N N M N N O N O N O \ O O N P N V V V 7 'D O O N N N N N N N N W N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V> coO I- O O 0 0 O N O O o O O m r O LO O O O O O O m 0 0 0 0 0 00 n D` N O rn Ln N f- OD O CD O CD �O mO` O• I� n O CO O cm) O• cor r N �O �O C` O` I� 00 I� n N . N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - -- N N M O N O O M 7 I� M 00 00 N O O I� W V N W M 7 7 L.(1 'q O` r Ln W M r r N w 7 OJ N 7 0 N I� x 7 10 N m O N V 7 LO u"1 LO to lA L' .D O lO IO I- n n OJ N O0 OJ 00 N 00 oo M N Lc'J N M L() 7 co to T r - - - r r - - - - - - r - r - r N N N CO N N N N N CO N (O N N N CO CO N O O N �O N N N N N N V N N N N N N N N N N N N N � M O W N M M l.C) N W fQ r V N W OJ 00 00 OD lD CO W W OJ W W W W OJ N W OJ 00 O M V I� W l0 0) r r r - r r -- r - -- r r r - r r r .p O O O o O O O O 0 0 o O O O O O O O O o O 0 0 O O o d j O O O LO O Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � O� O� I� r O CO O O U CO N �O �O O• O� I� m M D` O � N N O N 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 L� lO cO �O O I� n Y p cl C C C C C C C C O O O O O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C C C C O` w mal L.() m OD W w W W In W O` N O` I.() m m L(J Ol M M �O N M M LO W 1A W ti � r M M p V V Z3. V V V 7 7 V'T 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V � V V V D` m r P N OJ 00 m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 7 M�t 0D r- n M r 07 .p Q` N r Q` P V N N M N M O O` O` .O M 0 0 0 0 O 7 N 0 7 0 P O O M 0 0 I- N O LO M M Il r N O O O O O O _ R M N m 00 00 O` n N LO N D` N O w Cm O LO .O to O 6O I� m �t m O t O w O O M Ln .O D` O r O` N N 7 O �O �O M O� M I� Ln N M M r r r M M N Q7 O7 V co M O` Ln M O N N W O` -e P7 r r Y P m N O m r P m O` O` LO o O 0` N N N m m I- N LO M M 7 f- M M M M M V M M M M M M M M M V M 7 V V R V V O 0 0 0 OD co co N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 m m - 7 0D I- r E Gi , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD •� C N 7 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 r r n — o C C C 0 0 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 0 0 o r r `m � w m � Sri o0 00 00 � of m Sri w � m C � �ci �ci �ci m C � a o 0 0 0 o ri aS N (n a v v v v v v c c v v v v v v v v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N v 00 O O O O In m V LO o Of m oo J LT M r ca .O LL C) 0 N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U UM r N O 4- U) rp+ O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O Li }I R Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N L O t N N D N I� O I� N W W M 7 0'I� M' M M W O Q, N M N O N N O N O N O N N �O 7 O N O CL 7 O1 N V -It V 7 N I� r r O O N N N N N N 7 M O N I� o_ r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m r n rn o Rm c y R v M am fD n O > R O Y N O _T C Y U U M 00CL m zm o ._ m N O O O C O m ¢ C m m N p O O @ C _ Q= Y Y C -2: O z G7 o m LL N O "' U m O Y Z X (n 0 III 2 O E Q W 0) 0) Oi U U W m E U N m m C C N U U �p i m U i fL0 y C Y ¢ cd ji U 2 C U C O O m O m C C O 'C d "' O T a) m LL N m LL T m m 2 U yi _ X Y C m m U 0 ti m m > Q m O O @ > Q Y > C Q •-- m M E O L U d Q) O M a N O � � � � O .O- -O U m U N O m¢ O m a O m T O O m O 2 E O 0) O a J U H U LL -> CJ v> v> U U U H a m m R O U P S R R O O O L Q � fA fA C � c a� E Q y r O M 7 r0 0 r N O O co N O r M O W R W > M O O Ln N N N M M V V Ln r r r n U I� Ln O V Ln _ N LL a m � 3 � O d O Z Y f6 LL U- U} a> m x, rn z m<< d w w a � �¢ d V) ¢ U a m�¢¢ C¢ X¢ o a 0 a W¢ ❑ W m a m w J J J J J U co H W¢ Y a 2 O¢ U} Q N a W>CD 0_ N O M LO N I� U D` D` Lf) lfi �O M N LO .O I� r r Q. O 6) O, L2 N u'J N O D m O O O I� Q` O O N W D` r O P 7 47 Q % LL") 00 M i r 1 R D` M n W N Ln r N O] 0 0 0 Ll) U D` r Lfi 7 C (n cL `o a d � a 0 R 138 c w 2 d p) m 7 ❑ m a m LO co M O O CD O O O O CD O O O 2r r T 3 � r N H � d d A y N ti n N 7 6 O O M 00 7 M OD r Y O O r � C N m N N O O m 7 n n M LO M > Y 0 r n 0 r 00 W r� r �+ � N T N o N 0 r E CD w 7 ^ M M `m r0 C W an0 r C r fn N a o 0 N N r O O N c U LL O o dw Li L a a o d m 81 OR LO a R C y 6 h O N O > 16 N N a N m E LU rn m N m w LU Q Q Q d u O O � C 7 7 d N d � C O M N 7 P m C W O a O y c H v a o a m to N W d c) C) c}n V) `o a d :5 a 0 139 A N N N � N LL L CY .� Li LL JLLJ _ N 0 c 0 N L LL P✓7 _d) �> Y d 0 Co m O` 0 0 M M N O - O T C N � M M M V � l O N I� M N N M O O mO N� 70 0 0 N CD � 0 0 LO OJ O O O LN � M N 7 M 7 OO -P M L2 N N N M M O O c.34 r� M Cl P N 4. N M O� . O LL� N 7 7 O m m m� N 7 N N �O M O O I� V V C 7 M V 7 7 Lf) LP L(') L(7 LL7 L1') L() LP IS) � � � � Ln N � C4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P O O W'D - r O N IT r O V C N M M M It' � LT O N r M N N M O O m W C N 10 � O O O N O Ln 10 0 0 W W I to 10 O M rzT LT N 7 N M CT O O I� V � 7 u2�O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O I� to V O N to O O O O O LP O O O L.c) 0 0 to O O N N 0 M M N to O N r 0 O M V M M � N � 7 O7 O` <]` CO O O N O O N O N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M O M M N M N M W 0o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � m m O O O O O L2 O O O m O O Ln �2 O O m .o m O O O O O N N N 7 M M N 7 OO O� O` CO . . . O O N O M M O N M N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M O M M N N " M L O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O V O O O O O O V O O O O O O O O O O 7 O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O N O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X O O O M 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o O M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r- O O M N O O� M L O O In L L L m L L.() O O L.C) L.[1 In Ln L.C) CT Ln In W W LP V V C 7 V V C 7 N V C 7 V V C 7 V V C Ll7 V V r 7 V L(1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N N M N N N m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 O O O O O O M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M N U O O� M O to O O to Ln Ln LP to r to LP O O to to to to to of to m W m m I.C) 7 V zTC 7 zT I C 7 N V C V V V C 7 I.'T C l[J V zT r 7 W V N N n Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'T 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O . . N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W O O O O O O �O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD M M CD CD0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P c to Ln m O O z L[) V V 7 7 V V C R N V 7 7 V 7 C 7 V V 7 m Z3. V O to V LC) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N OJ N N 7 N N N N r J N F N aW= o a 2 Q LL z Q Q-' Z Z Q Z~ Z Q J U y a U Q w Q U LL 0 0 0 Q CO Y U W Y U Q U W LL Q a Ln H m Z U��5 LL M� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Lf1 O O m'o r cl 'o r �) 7! O, M m .O M C I CO a,M V Ln I� W C9 O LP LP .D LT 1> CT 11 O O O N N N 7 7 7 7 7 Ln LA O O O O �?O �-, M o, C O m P W o, `p C7 o = c. cP W CO N O ^ N M E Q m O U W m d m 2 N} LY X 0 Z d> d J}0� p N m U Y CY U Q 01 : Q d H 0 �}} U� Y �¢ Q m ; w LQn N n N w O O 7 O LT 7 _W — N ,y O N M 7 CO O O I� Ln r 7 M r �O N N O 7 P M n LT N 7 W V M N U I� P N M C N V C M N Lo W } Ln N �O N O N O O } M I� Q` O C N P P to } I� n V N J �O CT (n N O O O m u'> N N 7 o O— N M O I� M CO �O O (n V LP LP M I� .O 1 N N IL 4 d LL 0) N C 7 C > Y d C f1] m N 7 w M C � � M w It O r �2 O M N N r T � r O � P- D r w M O r w O lO w M M OJ O O M r u0 �q lO � �O N .O w O �D �O . � . r w N lO u) N u7 Lq O O w � 7 O` O, c O of r r M O N N a, 'O O` C, V 'O �o r V w O O. O O N 7 r M 7 M N M N 'O r O` m w L() M O N M w N r w V r a 7 V V C M r M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 7 w M M w 7 0 r O 01 'O M N N r V �,o, 'O �o V O, L P r w Ln a r w O, O w M M O O w M r LO .O .O .O N� w O� �O r w N LO N L Ln O O w 7 P C O' �O L<) r �O O' r r M O N N M LA O 7� LA O' �O O' O` ' d r a w Ln O 0"'O O N r M M N M N r N M O r Ln U r r r �O r Q N w Ln M O N M w N r w �O V zT C O1 V O O O O O O O O O O M V O O O O O O O O O L O L L 0 0 0 L � O w N N O O L O L O O O r r 0 Ln O O M O O O Ln 0 0 Ln O M 7 Lq M 7 7 M M r O r O` w r O` Lo N V O II) uI r Lq Lq O V O C M N M O O O` O M M M M M M M M N M N N — N N N N M N N N N — N N N N N N N N N N N— N M 7 Lq M M M r O C` Lq w w r C� Lq N 7 'O Lq M r Lq Lq .O 7 w M 1 N M O r O` O M M M M M M M M N M � N � N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � � N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O 0 C C� C� O O 0 0 0 0 0 C N � LC! w C O O 0 0 0 0 C C O 0 m m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m0 O C O O Ln � O O O O O�� O O O O Ln 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O� O Ln W OJ W W Ln m w w I W rn w co w w m l W W IO 10 L L m w rn w w In w r W l N W C 7 V V C 7 V C 7 w of w-Zil V V C 7 V V C O` O` V 7 31 V C� C -Zil V V C 7 of V C N N N N N N N N N t� N N N N N N N N 'zt 7 N N N N � N N N N N N 7 N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Lc) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� Ln w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L[J Lt) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O N LA �O O O O O O O O O �O �O 0 0 0 0 LA O O O O O O U O O Ln w w w w Ln w w w w� m rn w w w w L L w w �o Ln Ln w w rn w w� m r w L w w C 1 V V C V V V C 7 w of w 7 V � C 7 V V C a, O, V 7 V V of C 1 V � C 7 Ol V C N N N N N N N N N N V -ZT C N N N N N N N N V V N N N N I:r N N N N N N V N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C� O O C? C�O O C? O C�O C? O C? C� C� C�O O O O O O C?O O O C?O C? C? C?O C?O C?. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O C C O C O C)O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C�O O C� O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln w w w w Ln w w w 0 0 0 w m m m w 0 0 l L w w O w w O m r m O w w C R V V 7 7 7 C 7 O O O 7 V V C R V V 7 O O V 7 7 V O 7 7 V V C 7 O V C N N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N N N N N M M N N N N M N N N N N N M N N m a m O W x F J CD p] Z x x F O Q N C� Z N U m Z a z W Z Q U �_ U CC p pLLJ U z� a' J J J F F C'LLj F Z z z J F F Q Z (� U N W CC > a� Q cn m O Z d Z m OU W N> Z U a 0 x d d W J LL U Q n OU Q LL Q J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'u M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � LL (a L N N � Qi D` M <,•) r N � ,p r�� 0` � V M M r N M Ln V M M� N P� N r `O L<) Ln r� N< Q p]< J d m a d J U 0} p r e p o x W 0 Q Q U Q Q X W N U U m Q Q m p N U Q U a U Q p Q m m% m O w M 7 4 r O Lt] BO O Q wN mr In .QO M w .}O LO .QD N O �O W w m O N U` n Lo Ln .p M O r Ln Ln 3 M O r O, O� V M N r .O N O r N Ln � V M .O O O� 0 r M N N = M " cN N LL O O r Ln w M m 0 7 U I N N 'D L2 w lO 1D O M N N ON N I r M m O �O N m O � O� N .O r LA .O L(1 O �O O` � M O� M O� �O � 7 V L<) N I rn r r N In M � O w N r 0 M O LL� J 4 J � 1 1 m O O S � S M m S m m cl] r? . . . . O O O N O N m V I� M N BOO O M O O M LO M M I� .p N M �O �O V M M O M m m I N N M M h M M M L(1m M m M M m M mM � � M M U rvi Q Q LLI � `o Q a � n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O S S V M S S O Z m z r N O N V M 0 0 7 I� Ln 0 r n n m C 7 m O C V m S alM l �O IC Iz T 0 0 V m M V L(1 C V S m� z m S S S ON Om cc Nm Om N� m I� MN N� O O OO M � N N M O O M LO M M I� O O M M O M N �O � � N � M N L(J �O � � N l.C) � S �O S O O N O O O O O O O O O N O O 0 o O O O O O S O O n co Ln o Cn Ln o a v o 0 M S S CO m I- rr N N N N N — 0 0 0 0 0 0 L[1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 LP I� Lc7 O to to 0 0 0 0 0 O O CO O O S M S S OJ OR C� I- N N � N N O 10 M O O O O O O O S O L N O O O O O 0 0 7 0 0 L 0 0 L N C O L N L L LO LO LO QP S m S mLc� m S LO� LO 10 lO lO lO O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O rl�O 1� O O O LC! O O Ln O O O M O Ln to to LS7 LO � � r-: O� S OD S m � � c� � � LO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO O O O O O O O O O O O O O D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I� M O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O r-: O O O r�: O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O n n O O O O O O O O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O LO O O O M 0 0 C 0 0 I� O O M O r- S 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 O O N O O O O O m m S S m S C` V Lf1 m S m S m LA m M m N �O m L.() L.C) m m m S m m S S m m CO IS) m C 7 S V C 7 S V C 7 V V S S -It V 00 L.() , a, S 7 V V 7 V 00 a, � S S C 7 V V C N N 7 N N N 7 N N N N N� N N O O N S S N N N N N N S S N S S N N N N N S 7: O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O rn O O M N O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O M 0 0 0 I� O O M r S 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N O O O O O CO CO S S Co S S V- m S m S m Ln m M N m N 'O m LO Ln m m m S m m S S m m m Ln m C 1 S V C V Cl V C 7 V zT S S V zT O V S S V V V 7 V V m S 7 S S C 7 V V C N N V N N N V N N N N N C 7 N N M N N S S N N N N N N S S N S S N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O In O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I� M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O p p p p O O O O O O O O O O O O m m O S m S O V Ln m S m 0 0 L m M m O O m L L m m m 0 0 m O O m m m Ln m C R O V 7 7 O 7 C 7 V V O O V V CO to V O O 7 V V 7 7 V O O 7 O O C 7 V V C N N to N N N M N N N N N to M N N O O N O O N N N N N N O O N O O N N N N N S 7 W J d' � LLj Q y =� m a Q N W V1 y U w U J Do LL LL Cz co co z ~ OW LUi d' LLjN F � Q ~ LLI H� U U Q Y F H U (n O> W w N LUi LL LUi LUi CY Z� J F d w d Z) m U U N LLLL LWL J m m d N LL LL (n �� J Y u, Z, LL �: LL LL LL Z)— a U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'u M C S O N M I2) �O I� m S O N M 7 L.f) I" m O M C mm .O Im m S O N 7� n m S O N � O r- � � r- r- � � r- N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M 7�� � 7�� � LO Ln LO � LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � O 47 d (n > d 2 1 N Q= X y r z m M X J m X> y U> Q H O O U m~ LL U` U U Q Q> W Q Z m N O y y V U N> O y L[J Q .O X w m J Ln J U Q' >j >¢ F aj LO I� W .O N �O N N �O m 7 �O W W O N M O C� W I� O O M m N N W S W C N Ltd M M m� m I - r M M M Ln I� V Ln M M �O S O N I� m M M M M 3 'O O M O m I� N V Ln V �O M M S .O S N 'O M M V r m N I� N M S M M �O S Lo N = LL M M M L[J N Ln M M V �O L[') % M O M S S 7 M M M O N n r J M I� M 1� S M S r M M M M Lf) O 0 V) M M M m .O �O Ln R I� M S M M M S M I� 1 m rn IL 4 L 0) N C 7 C i Y d C f1] m o V V V n m n .o of O m r m O o r V r o r Q r r O o m m- o V z n n m z 0 OOOOM N 0 0 Ln . 'CZ M M M M N M N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N LI) N N N N V N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r V V r 7 m N m l[J In M N M V Ln M M M O In P N N V r r O O O O m N 0 0 �n O O M M O M N Ln M m o: M M M M N M N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N Ln N N N N zT N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q` M M o` o` O O O O- m Ln O O O O O Ln 0 0 0 Ln Ln O Ln O O Ln O Ln O CS O Ln Ln O O r V V M M O Ln O O V O Lo o o o o Ln o N M M 7 V N M N Io N M N O O o Ln Lt'1 r r *o M to to L() o to O O O O O Ln 0 0 0 to to O 7 O O Ln O to O Lf7 O Ln u'1 0 0 N O O m m 0 cl O O O Lo N o o O O LP o N M M � 7 N M �O O O �o Ln to N N N M N � � q LP Ln LP Ln Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O cl Ln O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m O O O O O O O O r Ln W W W W x I.() m m m m m m m c0 m Ln W m W o` W W m W O of o� O O m m m W O O o` C 7 V V C 7 V V C 7 V V C � V V C 7 V V C 7 V V 7 O of o� 0 0 V V C 7 0 0 o` N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O 7 t M M N N N N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m O O O O O O O O r Ln m m m m m Ln Ln m m m m m m m m Ln m Ln m of m m L m O of P O O m m m m 0 0 of C 1 V V C V V V C 7 V T C 7 V � C 7 V V C V V V 7 O of of o o V � C 7 0 0 of N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O V LA M N N N N m O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln m m m m m Ln Ln m m m m m m m m Ln m Ln m rn m m L m O O O O O m m m m 0 0 0 C R V V 7 7 V 7 C 7 V V 7 7 V V C R V V 7 7 V V 7 O O O O O V V C 7 O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O to M to M N N N N to O to C N N (n z U N ❑ LLJ w m m V)� Z w o U Z F U CO a� Z Z O0 LL C' LLJ U 0' O❑ X F Q F J O U m d W F F U m U m d 2 d } W U a X Q W Z W W U J Q W Q 2 0 0 J N 2 L 2 LL 2 S F Y Z Z Z (n 0 Q Q 0 Q U F N F z m�: z Q U m m U F—— LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 0 0 m LL LL LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u M C M LM M r m M.o r m 'o O N M 7 �O r m 0` O N M M W W r m W O L Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln C, ,o I .o "" I .o " .o r r r r r r r r r m m m m m m m m m m rn � LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � O 47 m r r M M O o` M V N o .O M_ o` M m 'o r M m 0 o N r M m t Ln N ❑ LL U 2 LL LLB X m U❑ d❑ N N X = d❑ 0 J a Q❑ 1 U` N� m M N 2 Z 0 0 C7 d' a m m m a LL Q m U W a m 1 m .o d' ❑❑ Q a❑ M Y❑} S Y S d' Q a Q m Lo z ❑ d Co 0❑ a M Y ZW C N O o> d F N co m W Z U' > JJa O 0 0-;T� ai m N m M Ln m Q` 7 M m Lo N m r N r 0 W a W a O• O M N i.) i� U 1p C o o r M �O M N N r O M O O r 0 V M N V �O Ln V M O M O m N Ltd D 3 r o, V Q` V r N C lIJ r m a 7 o N Ln O o N 0 m Q` o M M M M M Q` .o N 7 M M M = LL r, N O C Ln N m O o� �o r La') - N o m V r N N M Ln N �o N C O J m m o o m 0 m O m �o O D` m O N O � M M M M M M M M M o m O M M M 1 LO N rn IL 4 L 0) N C 7 C > Y d C f1] m O M O O L 0-2 O N .2 N W-� M O n M� L2 M O O M. N� � O T C 7 O O M O M O Lq N O �O L? O O� N Lq O Ln M M N .O O N E U� � � O W N N 7 O W Ln M O N N Ln O- Ln M O O Ln N M W 01 V N M O M W .O W W L N O O 'O 'O Ln I� M Ln L2 O W O 7 V M O` W I W W N r r 1 N M N N N N M N N L N N� N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O LO O N N W Ln M O r M O Ln M U �-O LO N O O O C 7 0 OM O M O L N O �O lA O a,N lA O LA M M� � NO N V a, C 7 0 W N N O co L M O N K O� O` N M P- M� O L N M W 01 'zl- N M O M W W W LO N O O LO I: MN M Ln L2 NN N r N 9 " U 9 M O' I2 U O� ON � W �D� � � M L WN I� WN WN NO Ln O: 9: I� n UN � r N � � Ln �� � � M V O N 0 0 0 0 V Ln O O O O W Lc1 O L L Ln Ln LV 0 0 0 0 0 I� C V 7 O V Lq Lq M Lq LcLO 7 LO M N LO O` 0` M Ih Il Lf) I� n n n W W O O V V I� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O —— O O O 0 0 LO Ln 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 Ln O Ln Ln 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O M to O O r O n r to O M O M O O to to to to to O O O O O Lq M M O ,I: Lq to M Lq Lq LC? M II) M M N LO O` O� M I- n Lq I- n n n n W O O I� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W O O O Ln O O O O O O O Ln O O Ln O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O D O O O O O O N O 0 0 0O O O O O O O I� 0 0 W Ln un 0 0 L6 O I- O O O O O Ln Ln M O O O O O O M O O oc� O O_ O O O O W 0 0 M IO N IT N n O O O O O N N V M';7 O O O O O 0 0 0 O� M O� Ln O O O 0 0 r- In O O V M O O O O O 01 C� N O O O O W O W Ln W r Ln M O 01 Ln N W W 01 V 01 W r M W W W 00 N W 0` O` W P a, O O O O P O V C Ol 6l Ol W O V C O` V V W P 0` O� 0, Pol V C 7 V V C I� M M M M f In N N f t�C� O� M N N � N N- t 7 C� f C N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O O O In O O O O O O O L[J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 10 LO 0 O O LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O W O O N 10 M a, (V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O M O� L[J 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O M 0 0 0 0 0 Q O W I� r 0 0 0 0 W O W In In n Ln M r O P L[) N W W O V Ol Il W Il M W W W W W W 31 Ln P U O O O O Ol O(N N O1 Ol D` W Il O(N N � -ITN N �O 0` D` P P D` D` N N -ZTN -ZTN U C 7 O, P C L[J L[1 Lfl lt1 7 In N N 7 V � 0` D` Ln N N V N N 7 V V P C 7 O� N N N N N C N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V O O O O O O O O O O O O O I� O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Ln O O O O O O rn Ln O W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0` W W W W O O O co O O O O O O O O V 7 O O O O O O V 7 O V V W O O O O O O V C 7 V V O M M I- O M M M M n M M N N M M M O O M N N M N N 7 M M O n M O N N N N N M N Y m a V) Z w Q Q 0] Q Q m m M CC m LNi Of H W d' d' d' CC m Z 2� co N co > J J J J H J � J H J H J z> H a= 2 H H H F H J W J O] 0 U Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z 2 2 V) 2 Z> 2 U V) = VN = Q-' 0 VI Q on d (n (n (n (n N= m J Q Q Y Li LL LL no LL w w w LL LL = LL J w LL = LL = w (� = U LL 0 _ _ _ _ = LL > 0 N H M LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'u M Lo .O0 Io W0 co'� O N M C L2 .O I� W 0` O NN MN VN LA .ON INN WN O' O C NO` MU IO` W O`QO0 N0 M0 V0 U� 0 � � � � � � � � N N N N N M 0 0 � LL N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M (a L N N � Qi = M 0` a, ^ `� co .O M 0, M M O M C LA co_ O W N =¢ 0 N N U N U J X Ln 2 X H 0, U> N a> a H LPL F LPL V) Y } 0 U N Ln (7 o a M W LL. a C7 �p Z U 0 W n-[O W Q> m `1 a Q a W CD CO U m U LL Q X¢ W N N o 0' Y a Q X Y O Q U J J Q> U Q U J J U J U U U U U U (� 0W Q 0 :.� 0Q N Q I� O W O N W N Q M LA N N I� N N N N N Q 0, O' Ln W V) N M M M M M M M M N M Ln N M O� N M N M Ln N N �O �O N N N N N M Ln L(i M M m—>m� Ln m mmm > mNWO Q O� = LL M M (n M M M M M M O� M LA W M V O� M O� M M W O� M 0 O� O� O� O� O� M O� M I� W O M 144 4 d LL 0) N C 7 C i Y d C m m L2 .O D, N n M 1 n It V P n �t N n n O �O L2 Ln n M. M M-. C M M n N O M O I� n M O M .O n M N .O O M M .O M N I� g M N N�q O` O M Ln t» c` ry ry M O` M 'O O m 'D O W O D` O 'O 'O O M oo .p oo O m M .O .O O O m I� M C N LS) O7 Im M 'O r, W Ln N O O O` M 0 M MN � O �O 7 LP W � n C O N N N � � V V QD � N O M � � N �� N V O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O W O O` O M O w O cO M�t O O w I� M �O N Ln 4 r M �O U W l[J O N 2 U O` � LO O O` M M N n L(i .O O 'O C L(J O r C O N N N V V oo N O M N N N� O O O O O to r r ttJ n n O` O O O C O 'O 'O V O O M O O N O O• O O O O Ln 0 7 rO co c� M W N N N oo O O O O N N N to O LLP O Ln on of N O N M I- O� �O O7 h O 0 lb O �O M O Lq t7 O O N m M r 0 V ` W q � .O 0 0 0 0 LP 0 0 0 0 0 Ln LP LP 0 0 0 0 0 Ln L.() L.() 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to Ln 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 O O Ln O N LP 0 0 n r N N N r O O O W N N N LP LP O � O Ln C'J O r r LS) O O N O M I- O` � OJ �O I- O W D` � N I- N LP Lt7 O` O N N W M M �O O• LP I- N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — —— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — —— 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N Ni O O O O O O O W W O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O w m O O` O N O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LP 0 W O` 0 O O O` n 0 O O C O r-i Ln O O N C rl O M C 0 0 LP Ln n V O of M O O O O oo O M O O I- L.c) C O• L.c) Ln W M oD c ` OD c ` r 'o O O` coO` W � 'O L.C) O O` I� c O o0 O` c 'O V I� � O` O r L.C) O C 7 V V W w O` O` cT O` P P O` O -It V O` ol c� O` O` W W n O� V cT w P W , C O w V O N N N N O• O• O• O` c` 't 't O` � O N NC, O` O` O• O• O• O` O N N C� t M N O c` O O O O O O O O O O �t r O O O O O O O Ln Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O W O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O Ln 0 0 O DOl ` O N O O O O M �a 0 0 00 0 0 o Ln O o� D` a O O O O O O O I- Ln 0 0 g N N O I� O M O O O Ln Ln r'j O O] M 0 0 0 t` O W O M O O I� Q` L[J Ln oo M X U M O` n 0 O O` W O` X O Ln O O` r �O O X O` P 'Dn O` O r C 7 V V O O O• O� Ol O` Q` P Ol O V � O` O` Ol Ol Ol O o7 r O CT V a,m P N P C O W N N N N Ol Ol O� 0,Ol 7 V 0, a,O N N C Ol O, O` Ol Ol Ol Ol O N N Ol C 1 V M N O V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O o` Ln Ln m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0` N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W P 0 0 0 0 0 0` O O O O C R V V O O O O O O O O O O V V O O O O O O O O O 7 V O O O O O C O O O O N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 M M O O O N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O M M Ln 7 N O m O O Z a W Y Q C' Z Z Z F- F- m U -j U d' d' d' U� d m U CC d' K F- m U Q z m-j F- -j -j M m� m W> 2 0 cn to 2 W 2 LL (n (n (n LL Q 2 LL U1 N N VI 2 Z LL U Z 2 2 (n 2 2 Q 2 z 2 2 d (A no U Z) Z) LL LL LL LL Z) Z) Z) LL U LL LL Z) Z) Z) Z) LL LL LL J U LL LL Z) LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u M C N M V LP �O I� 00 O O N M 7 LA ar W O` O N M LO Ln L r m 0 O N M 10 LA 1O I� � � � 7 � � � � Lf) LP mLn Lf1 Ln LP LP LP LP 1D �O 10 10 10 10 10 �O � LL M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M � O 47 J d X C `C Z 0 m d O 0^-C V O 07 M z O, Ln U N O`LL 0, M LO Ln d N N H 0 0 O� V m X U m p U d 0 F CD m U m m N 0 t Q LL 'O m W, �- M= C) 0 U)O w Q Q U U a a U U Z Y a z 0 0 0 v m O z �, � a� U Q� -_ O 0 0 N LfJ O <O N N a W Q W N N N W M N Q W N N N N a 0 W m m Q 1p CO O Ln O p 3 D` L('J n N N M M M M N N N M O O M M N N N N M M M CO M M N M M 0 M M M M = LL o n o rn a o o O 145 I� N O N M M M M 0` lT D` M Ln M M U D` D` M M M LP N M M D` M m M M M M M OM tC1 [) O u] M N O O O O V co r 'o o r ri M O O o O o ai o m r r o a N r N ra lr a m m to N N o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tN O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 1 O O 1 o O 1 O O O O O o 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O tT O N CN O r M -q O O a1 N m r r N N r N N rn In ow IA N N N O M p p p p m O O O m O M 0 0 0 0 1b O to P P� r LC7 mO r o O O N M N M N O O O O O O O O O O O O co O O O O O O O O LCJ O� O` r r r N O O O O O O O O N to N N O O O O O O O V _ M M 7 ll� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O to M M o o o o o o o O r 0 0 0 0 0 o r r L' n to r m n cc lO tc1 P o V M M o o C W V V C 7 o N c� N N N N O N n oo r CO n o � o O O O n � o 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o V -It 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 os r n Lo to M M W 7 W cc o� O tD M M N co M oo M O O O t0 O O O W � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m to Lo N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V M C7 7 V O O O O O O p m to to M M 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 to � r �n n Ilicl r r oc Z o ui a` o to cl) 0 0 a o v v a a o N o N N N N O v 0 r 0 n 0 7 0 0 O 0 to � oo O O 00 } X N Y Y HZ) z f0 Z R f0 ft1 Z) F- ¢¢ H m O CO O (,�j d O W O W �� U) U) O (1) U) l6 Q tT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N V 7 N N N LL „ =+ C 0 O Om O O r r r r O W O M LL � � � d Q Q C O = o n U 7 J U� Q N y w d¢ Q� ii oo 2 N y 0 co m r r to ¢O C C C M n (N LL wm , O O O m iH LL In LL In LL N 146 0 m 0 0 �: 0 h f'- 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 � — �) m w 0 0 0 m Cl? MC? 9 9 9 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 �; -'s CC,,, lul) c,� aM (o M �; M M � 0 ID M M m (P ",O000 �;MLO (D (D C� 0 U� 9 - "I ; M M � 0 W m co CD M cc � w - 0 M CO 'o - M M 0 0 N W LO CO m 0 m m C\l N G� N M 10 ct m N I- cl) (1) In " 0 0, 0 0 0 M U (P (D m (P U� I N w m 0 C, v 0 cr� ci tll-o cc � Ct M cl� 0 M Cl> It N 0 (D 04 (Y) 0 m (D 0(R c CO m (D 00 'T (DO q c lf� N �2 Nc t� Cl) : 0 N 0) 0 0 0 0 m u n CO 0 0 0 i'W C;� M w - Ct 0 CC n� IC040C CD Lx� 0 - co li h. n m - o- c N M �? r- 0 N clj c r- N M Azy 4 0 r E to (D LL (D C6 0 C) r m 0 16 E (D aD (D 0 m M M at S > x (D a) (U 0 E E o E > 0 0 (D CO CD Ct m c 9) 1 0 C-4� C� 0 Ox- E P� 0) 70- co m c E CD C E m 0 E -a m 0 m > L) . > -,z c m E I N co M C4 co Cl) O (D ac) :2 E > a) E CD �5 04 m Q) (D 0 0 C CL M , -r U) .o M . 24 O O 00- -0 co 0 (D UU)) T @ fo M cm Z (D 147 y R � 3 ❑ R R a � M 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O T � R jp C T T T r T N H a d d � y N N n 0 0 0 0 N 7 O CT O r tb t0 OM YM O L(J OJ O n M O O ti M O V M O M m n Qf N r W n 0 0 0 0 N 7 O rn O r of to R > M O r OJ OM n M L(1 OJ Y O r M W W a M O M M O Ic L[1 QI (n N r i+ N •��y N N N N o h o w m C O R M O r W M q N > N O L17 M M Ln m tP v = 7 R O M N m M a n a rn J fn - M N r C C i d _ p V = O N w O CT 'O r O N N 4— U) 0 0 0 0 0 Li L R Q L N N= N N O o d a o 0 0 0 0 v d N V � m R C � � R � > R ¢ m Ln O w r a) v Y LI W c0 N N 9 O } p � E N y Lo co U a OI R E w > — <Ev o o a E ¢ Y a d a m C m m U O n y c d E N N M W lT N N > O N N O M N L 7 O V Q T A CL Y 0 M O M O ❑ l6 } } } } U m cn o cn Ln cn O tD M M O 0 M O O 7 V N N �O tD M M P to Ln O � O tV N n M C1 .O tD L2 LY P o 7 � Lin LLO'7 cN 04 n a v lo to M M T to N N � n O O O O O O m Ln " N O 0 O m O tT C� T C! U O] M O Ln LO m N co of O O O, Of O O T r M W m Lo co w 0 o rn q O O W n N co ro N R M co O O 0 N N N M M M M M 'r�� } a Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 'O 01 N L(1 M V L(> M N N O N N N 0 0 Q O 0O 0 O O O O r O O O LL � O L[) O N N O M .O N 0 M O O MM 'O M N N Ln (%J LA tT O N co co N M n V M N mD O V O O� N V Ln V � 7 W V W Ln O Ln O O O O O O O O m M O � coof O tD O O O M in 7 � � m 7 r O M O O O O O O O O O N O Ln 0 0 0 0 Lo IN L'Ln O V N CT L(> C P N CT P W tT P r `O N O, m CT P P P P P'T LT P O, CT U Ol It 01 It 7 N U It U't O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M COV 'T 'O 0 0 Lc) W M co W Lc> LS) O O O tT IN rn m CT O m rn O O Ln c` 7 N c� - c� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln 0 0 0 0 O O Lc) O Ln Ln N O Ln O Ln (T O 9T � W (T U O CL N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N O N O N O O O N o N O o, O M N I� O o O o 0 0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N C C C C C C C C C N a m m m m m m m m m a a a a a a a a a g R N N N N N N N p � U U U U U U U J U 4 E E E E E E E'E E `m m�5 m m �5 c5 co p Lo m z Li Li Li Li Li Li Li 2 Li z m m m m m m m m m m m m m p W W W W W W W W W W W H v 'L 3 V v N M n co co O M W r o u V N L o N M O O L�co N X� W } 3: z > LW a y U W W W W W W Q W U .Q - M M M M M M M O M- o d LL M M M M M M M M M M M 148 LY 04 >, d v v v v v v Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u) Ln Ln L(l Ol Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln 10 10 10 10 .O 10 10 10 10 d O CD - 10 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U" 07 r3+ ❑ N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U R R 'D I� r of P O V M O V of M M I� n n N M O V P O N O O O M of N d N O M O N N O N N N N N N O N M ry M M N O N V M 'O O 'D I� r W W W P P O N N N\ M .O W P P O O IL O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LL Lo N W 0 0 'D O O Ln 'D 0 'D 0 7 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Ln N Ln 'o M Q d co M n m M m I� O n O O N O w O W M N O M 10 m M N P W O LA m M N P m N x O d of �O I� 7 P 7 P I� 7 LD .O LD .D 7 m m m m I� N �tl .O Ln Ln LD P W I� P O P 7 - 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0- a O O N M V N O I� N m P �O I� r Ln X L.C) �2 'D N 0, 7 P P M NM M 'O .2r Oo P P P P 0 0 0 L�J O O O W O c N N N N N 0 rJ M M M M M MM M M II 01 .ryD -zal M� R jp O r O 'D 'O 'O 'D 'D M 'D 'O M o0 'O 'D 'O 'O 'D 'D 'O OJ 'O 'O I� �D N P CO N N N M N N P N N I� M P M N M N N N N N N N O N N Ill Oo N I� 7 0 V O Oo W Oo W W N Oo N W 00 W Oo W Oo W W W W Do N W I� H .a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ill Ill O O O O I.c) m O O O L[I Ill 0 0 0 Ill O O O O O O O O O O O j0 m 0 0 <N � O m O N N O m 0 of I� O N 10 m O 10 I� O Ln m L L 0 0 m O W �o I� 't P 't O W O P N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L(J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I.f) O Ill O O O O P O LA O O P I.f) O P T "O O� O O O O N O Il) O Y o O M O O Ln I� c N O O r O I� O CO O N O I� P P M M N V 0 0 0 0 0q O O O N O O P w w P O o 0 O P O P O O P O L(J M 'D 0, I� O O o 0 0 M N P co 'o O m a, a, a, a,O O w 0 m O alo P O P N O a,O P w , I� P P O O O 0 0 P P P a, a, 7 0,� O m o" O 7 O't m M 0, � Ln t O� P M P � 7 Ln Ln m Ln Ill P P P P �t m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ln O Ill O u7 0 0 Ln O Ln O O Io O O O O O O O N O Ln 0 0 O L() O Lc) 0 0 0 0 _O P CDLCl 'D P M P M Co P 'D CO P'D P o' 'M o c, P M LO m M M Io oo N N rq Ln P O L(l Ln I� S O r N Ln I- IS) 7 0 M 0 Ln 'O W P Y Lt'1 7 P V P N 'zD P O N M .O .O l.ti P M N U') N I, LA I, r 0 7 O4 O 0 n P P 0, It L('1 r 7 W 't V �D I� n W M 'D IlD �D M �t N I� M .D 'D 'D �D IZD 'D It M 'D N V M �t M M 0 0 P 7 P 7 P P 7 P � 7 7 N P 7 �� P 7 P M P � 7 �� 7 7 7 P 7 P P P 7 �+ W W I^ E V/ N N •�C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — N C C C C 0 0 0 0 C C C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 C C C C 0 0 0 0 C a � `m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 (/� M Ocu C d i '0 O O N w P P a,N O O N N O O O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O Li }I R Q N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N L 0 t M W I� a,O M O I� mt M M O Lo I— n n M O�t P O I� O M O M M O O M O N N N O 7 O Q 0 0 7 \ N tV \ OO O O N M N M 17O 7 M 01 N N N N N W w W In 'o 'o'O 'O N N M N N N N M �o M 01 OO I.L a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m s r R c � R > R Q m Q Q Q fl_ fl_ a Q fl_ O O O O O O O O C C C N C C C N 2, C C C C Ol N N N 'm o' N C y C C C C C C C C O) _� _� _O) @ @ @ Q @ Q @ @ Q @ @ @ @ Q Q Q Q Q @ Q @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C � C a a a g a g @ @ @ "0 "� @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ "� "� @ @ @ 2 2 2 2 o o- 0 0 0 0 0--- 0 0 0-- 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ @ J J @ J J J J J @ @ @ J J J @ @ J @ J J J J J J J J U U U U U U U U L L N N L N N N N N L L L N N N C C N L N N N N N N N N d E E£° E° E E° E E E E E E E o o_o E E E'° E° E E E E E EEE @@@ s@@ 0 0@ o@@ o 0 0 0@@ o 0 0@@ o@ 0 0 0 0 0@@ 0 0 0 N N W LL LL Z LL Z 2 2 Z 2 LL LL 2 2 2 2 Z Z Z 2 2 2 Z Z 2 Z 2 2 2 2 2 LL LL 2 2 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ N N N N N N O d d N N N d N N N N N N N N N O d d N N N d N N N N N N 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 o m o 0 o m o 0 o a a o o a o 0 o m o 0 o m o 0 o a a o o a o 0 o m W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N � r+ C L � d E N N N r N N Ln O M LD P O NM I� co O 0,I� O N NM P N N O W I� a, P N V P Ln O r r Co w W W P co P N O �D Ln P P P O O O N M M M M Ln o �D M M M M M M N N N N M M M M M N N N N N N M N N N M M M M N N N M M M Mlvi 0 0 U V N C O d � Q> ¢ w z D} m N m a>> N X x c7 N a o N N rn X v V N R d W ¢ N M _= y/ W W m Z W W .O N LL n : Z> LL N V IL d Y Y J O Z¢ d 0 0> J J Q Q O ¢¢ O¢ �1 Q X �1 �1 J d d w w w c7 w C7 ¢¢ c7 0 w w¢¢ w w 0 0 w w 0 0 0¢ 0 0¢¢¢¢ w w¢¢ c7 R M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C U LL M M M M M M M m M M M- M M M M M M M M M M M m M M M- M M M M M M M M 149 a' Cl) >` N i+ C E N .= N > N CY J c 7 � - 0 0 d i _ p V 0 0 d U) Li L R 0 V a N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N \ N N N N V O r O O N N M N � � N O Ol M O O O r of in r O M N � N OD L[1 DD 'O co Ln r N 'o T r O N M rO r N r r N N N co N N OD oD w w r ao oD N O o o O o O r 0 L[) O O M O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 1 Lo 1 c O O O P O O N O P U V O O M O M O 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v c O V r R N LI'1 O fD a• a rn rn a• rn n M 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 o v N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N o 0 0 0 rn ri Ln 0 LO M N fl_ Q M Y Y Y U Y Y m 0] C0 � 07 a7 C C C C C U J J J J J N E E E E OE EC)m �5 O O O O O � LL 2 2 2 2 2 > LL N N U N N R w w w w w � N O N � 3 L En <.i N c V V O 10 10�o 0 M M M M M M a 0 U T C C d 0 Q CJ > o Q z a 0 0 0 y w ¢ ¢ , ¢ a M O O A 0 0 M M M M M M LL M M M M M M N N M M M M M V V V V V Lll Ln l.() 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 } p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 2V N N N N N N N N N\ N N N N CV 2V N N N N N N N N N in O � O Ln in i2 Ln 2 � 7 U N M M M � M M � � � � \ M M M \ N \ M M M M M \ \ M Q Lf P M if1 r 001 N M V O O N N N M M V I.f) LA r OD OD .Q IL V o O N L() O M V O O oD 0 0 r O M o O O "O O O O Q d WOJr M O 't M 7 W C O a_O` co M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N O O o O N d V N 7 � 0 r M 7 V L of 7 O, 01 O O• P O O O N M M V W 1O N W V N m V N r O M r O N N C` N N W M V V L .O 10 r r a, O` M M M V l V 7 V V Lfi I.() L(1 o rn rn o r m L2 c• m � 'o M rn M r m x w rn- O• .o r M CO O r 3. -ItO M N M x r w O M M to V O• N O to O• N O M V Ln o LO r co OD w o m BO O co OD r V r r V N W r r �O O Ln Ln O) Ln Ln Ln O Ln O O L(1 m O O O O o O Ln O o r W N � � M � � N M M M M Ln Ln r r M r r o r r O O�� r 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O Ln r r rn O O o 0 oD O Ln o Lq oD o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . O r CO m cN 0 0 0 o N O r O r N 0 Ln Ln O O_ CDLn O O Lo LA CO IO U 0 0 0 oD N co O OD M O �O N N N O � O Ln � IO IO r r M 0 0 oD oD M 'D L[) lO Ol� O O r� V .O P 'o to r O` O O` V 'o a r N w In V W a,w O, r r M w 'o D` w P Ol a, P O` P m a,a, O r P O` O` Ol P P Ol a, P O` N W �O 7 � O` O` 7 't of U U Ol U O, � � It 7 .O � � O• O` ' U Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O Ln m O O O m 0 0 0 to n O m N to LPG O O LO O O Liz Ow Or O 'o rOrN rr Nn_ O O �O O` �O M W �M N W _ o O O N 7 O` r V LO N O LO m M N N N V O O L.() LO M W V O C)OJ r co O` 10 10 �O OD m r N 10 10 �O 'O O` 'O 'O C` M .o N N 'O - m rn C• a a rn am C• a rn rn o• a a a a a s C• C, a rn O• a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o O O O o O O O 0 O O O O Lc) O O O O O O o O n n o o n Ln o 0 0 Lo 0 0 0 L n r n n o o n o 0 0 U D` D` N D• N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N in M N N O m N O N\ O N M c N Lo M In � M �o �o 0, 0, M o � � � o � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N to N VI N VI VI VI V1 t� N N N N N N N to N VI N VI VI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ d N N d N N N N N N N N N N N N d N N d N N N N N N VN N N N NV� N Ln Ln V? N Ln Ln N V/ VN VN N N N N N N Ln Ln N d O M L[1 M O` O` N O N M M m .o O 3 V I..() 0 V V 0 0 M N N M N N M M oD M M M N M M M M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N o c O Q N N 0 0 U T>� M O` O` O O N �O 00 M M M r r O D ❑ z N Q w > M> N U 2 d d F H LL LL d Ln N p N N Co U U F CD m m m } Q Q m m m m m m .o U U U U U COOJUUUNUUUUUw UCiUUUUUUmUUUUU V) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N L6 i m m m N m m co m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m ��(;, ;, 150 N 0 0 0) 7 R R a M 22 O 3 Lo O 00 M CD O N r O 3 T r r R jp E 00 O M llO M l0 M �+ W E C N > N .= N CY J � - 0 0 d i p U 0 0 IL L 0 a O O O O O O N M P O o r � P O Li n r M O co r T d O O O 3 O O o � 0 0 0 C O O `m 0 0 0 IL 00 0 n r N N N L Q N N V N O N 7 M N a o 0 N d �L 7 fi 01 cn C O a O U 7 (9 4) d H m M W M O W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } p u M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P I� M Cl M M M M P P M if) M M M P 0 0 0 M N M M M N O O � O N N N N O \ O O N M M \ N N N M O N N O V L() 0 W W W W O O r r N N N N N N N M M M 7 7 V L[! .Q IL r N P N N N N N N N M N N N N O O N O O N N N N Q d O P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T Ln P O O L�7 O m 0 0 m 0 0 0 O LO T O O m O M P 7 7 P M P S P m P M d 0 0 �O r M O r N N M N r M I� co N N M M N M — N N N N N N N M M N — — —— N N N N N N O_ M 'O M P M M P 7 0 0 O O N M M V �O M Ln V l. I.() N N P M 7 r r O N M M M r P P P r N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M O N N 'O N 'O 'O M 'O 'O 'O V 'O 'O 'O 'O I 'o 'o - - 'o P V N 10 zT CN P N P N L7 N N N N N N P P P P O N P P N L N N V lO V o0 V O L O M M M M M oc 7 V M O O O O V M O O M 7 M L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O_ 0 0 O_ O O O O Ln Ln 0 0 0 �n O L�1 0 0 �n O O O O in in O O L� O M O O M O P N M M N M P M P M P m P M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C O C O C O C O O O O O O O O O O O O C C O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O-- m m M- In O l.() Ln O L Ln Lo M M- M M M M M In M N l.!) N O M v v v-Zil v v� v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V � M I� 'D P 7 Ln I� Ln In 'O LC1 C,N P O L() O M .O I� M M M N LC1 V M LA M M M M 7 7 M M r� r M r Q M N' n t O 'O 7 O I� 'D' P 'O I� P 'O � P � N O M M I� r M .O O M N M O P O P 'O O I� M M O 'O P O V Ln O 7 N CDr, M M_ N M_ N _ CDLn Ln Ln M � P P �O �O O O M O LA O M' P 'O L() 'O 'O 'O 'o r- P O L.() LO h P N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n n M n n O n m o m n m M M M M M M M m M M m M o M v a c v v v v v v v v v v v v v v a c v v v v v v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M O M P M P M M P O O P M O O M P M P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O I� M P M W W M 01 W M Lo m O W I� n O� O O P r M N r r O O Ln V \ 'O M 'O �O O M M 'O O O\\\ N N N N N N N M M M 7 V V M m Z) U c CL R t0 O O N Y C V) C C U C m U Y O W W ¢ E a C Y U C N C (Q Z ... N U m p E O C Y Y N V Y Y a U LL Y U _U U m tp m c c C c Q Q Y= c o c m. U¢ o Z m o �° c m m N m R Y M m U Co Z W C N A m m m > In O m Y N R Q = V) t6 m V N Y C m U m C i N C U O C y t6 m i N m 7 C @ O C f6 O T� O O— U R LL C t0 N N m p U m U C cp C N 9' (a a' X W W V, N fUp Y m Z E C V) m U T E m E= v O o o o c o m° a c `o 0 o c LL Y 0-V) Q Q U Q V) Q m� U W a Y Y V) �: V) > Q z U U W LL 'O Cl M M O M P 'O I P 'O I� P 'O O ClO t t O P M Ln M P Ln C,N N O � V O� 0'O a' 0' a'O O 'O 'O M� V Ln M �O 'O N M N I� N N O 0 0 0 N y0 0 a G1 Q N N W O O w N 0,P 0, 00M� N.NO ¢ 0,LL W J X¢ m U¢ U m Y U P LL =u� MrO 7lMf) O7O MuO� MM.O MMV .MNO NOpm ¢ Q LL m Q J¢ U Q Q Q W Q UXmr) wii d ❑¢ ¢ d , X LL d¢F- �PCOO7 NOn PV 2N O M O N In N I� P I� lt) 7 I� M I� N U N OM O M O O M O M O O O N Nm N N M 151 r Ln T �+ W C E V/ N .= N > N CY J c 7 N � - M � O � O d t i O C) C o 4- U) Li L R O V CL a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N V N N N N N N N N N N N N a O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M V V V 7 LA Li') I.f) i0 L[1 O BOO .O .Q dl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O IL N M N O N N N N N N N N N N N M M M V M N M M M M M Q d O Ln Ln Ln O Ln in Ln in O O in in 0 m O m O Ln Ln O m O Ln in O O O in O O O m O O O �O O` O a � N N M O N M M M M M M M M M M N N M N N M N N N N N N d N LS) l.() ' L.[) O O` 'o V 7 7 O M O 01 I m N M I n n In 'o�o 0Ln 0 M m 01 M M O N 00 O -ItAD O �O �D P O N M m m O` N N V -ItV LP I� r m m m O` O V V 7 r V V -zl- m L L() tP to to L 10 10 10 10 10 10 I n r n n n n n n n n n m m m M O - �O �O M �D �O �O �O �O O �O V V O 'O C` m I� M �O L N c` �O N N O I� N N N N N N N N V �O N N N LP O �D �D N V N N 7 N N N N N V L m O V m m 4. N m m m m m m m m IO r m m I� V 4. V V m IO m m O m m m m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m LP m 0 Ln m m m 0 O m m 0 L O m 0 m m O m O m m 0 0 0 m O O O m O O O I� M 0 N Ol M M N M M� �H M O lO Ol O O N N M m- m 't O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L M LO M m Ln Ql 7 m m Ln Ln L N m Ln m M LO M m m L.() m m L.() m m L L m N L m m m V V � V V V 7 7 V' 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V � V V V 7 V 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V � V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N OV � 4` N 0 7 P Q• � m O O O O M M O N 4` � N m O � 0` O m O D` M M m O a` M Ln .O M N 7 N m N ID D` 00 m O• ' O` I� O` 7 M CDM O LL] m M D` D` N O` N N I� r 0 7 I- r V M M M N N P N O 0 0 M M O` M M N V 7 Ih m m r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Lri w of m Lti a m of Sri Sri Sri of m m of w m w m 00 m m m Sri m of Sri m w m w 00 of v v v v v v c c v v zT v v v v v v v v v c v v v v v v v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O` O` m O Ol m m O` O m m m M m m m M O` O U O� N O O O O Cl U U O` O` U O` O` O• U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N (N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M O N M I� O �O �O 'o in M r U r N O N N N N M N M N N M M N \ M N N N N O N ,O MO O W M O O O O\ N V zT 7 L.[) Ln Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 Q � z LL N - O E > C L a @ m C Q Y Q @ Z) c U > m o c@ Y a U c> c f° Y H c m Y m.� y Y @ _ cY @ c m Y O N c N rm On O O m c 'E" N c Y C_ m @ C @ @ @ Y m i U m o f L@@@ o? m o m c@ U l o c m m U m c x E° Y U O Y LL Z c N 1 Y F Y LL @ O O m m m Orn C N @ U c N m N E F @ s o N@ m@ Y Z o m LL m C N 0> @ @ i U c O O m U u Z O O m O U m N E c 2 N O L L T VI O N (n O O 7 �n N U 'N o U E E a 2@ 2 V E E° y^ 6 a X o E V 3> m N a 2 Q Q m cc U m v z' z m z m a L L a o � U a L' -S) U 0 �t N � O N m � 7 O N O O` M - �O m� L.[) �O I� U U r V m O V Ln O LP 2 LP 2 �2 r n O Ln m m M m m M m U P P U O a d O N M m P M N o M M P M .O N O` N R m p 2 2 p y Z p❑> 0> Z J� p LL m y� m 0 0 2 U` p� N> Y J 0 m m c� Q ¢ Q m Q Q U K Q LLB a p Q Q J 0 m X 0 0 0 p Q 0 X Q Q U Q U U cn ¢ Q �O N D` .O N m �O .O .O I.t) �D �O m V M I� N I� n Q` O LO m I� M n N N M O �O N O �O 'o �O .O L() Q` Q` n 7 7 u) Ln M V O L() .O N I.cO r O' 'O N N O L.[) O 'O N m 'O �O Cl 7 O ci n O O M O m D V ON O O O m O P M V P N n 152 to T �+ W C E V/ N .= N > N CY J c 7 N � - M � O � O d t i O C) C o 4- U) Li L R O V CL a N N N N , N N N N N N N N a_ 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ N N N \ N N N N N N N N 2V N \ N N N N N N W W �O O �O M M 0 0 0 0 u'� O O O M P V V M O 0 W W W P O N U N ,O O I� r r W W m W W W P P O N N N N N N M M M M M M r V V R M .Q O_I M M N N N N N N N N N N O N N N O N N N N N P 00 Q d in O Cn 0 0 0 in 0 0 w x in O O O Cn 0 0 0 0 in u7 m O in O O in P u; O O in O �n W a N M P 0 0 0 P O W W W 'O P P In � 7 �n .O �O �O �n .O � N N — N N N — N — — — O O 0 0 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O a P P � N W In In N N N M O W 7 V V W 7 M O O I M r 7 o N Ln l.() M M V 0 I� 7 L(1 uw 'O Im r W W W P M Lci 'O 'O O N M V Lf! II! 0 'O I� W P P P P O N N N M m m m m m m m m m m m m P P P P P O O C O O O O O O C O O O O O O CNN N N N N NNNN N P N W N N N V m m N N NNNN NNNN NNNN N N W W W W W W W W W W W O W L W W W � N N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O m 0 0 0 m 0 0 m � m O O O m O O O O m m m 0 m 0 0 m O m O O m O m 0 N M P O O O P O m m m P P Ln 't 10 10 m 10 10 10- .O � N zt 10 M N N O N N — N N N — N — —— O O 0 0 0 — — — — —— O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C C C O C O O O O C C C C C C C C C C O C O O O O C C C C C C C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W I W m W P P W W P W In W W W In L W W m W W W W W W W W W W W In W P W m V V V V V 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V V V V I�t 7 V 'T 7 7 V 'T 7 7 V V � V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I M r r O N m P V I O P 10 m � V W O � I W W M 'O 0 7 W � N � W W� P M � � I m I N N M M P O M O M O O m �O P M� M V N P � M P � P m P 7 in n �n m I� O P W Ln CO O P ClP W W N 0 Lcl M W V P N V N M W .O Lf1 7 L(1 V I..(7 l.C) 7 M V M M N I.S) N O V M M O O O P W P h m m W �O V M R M V M M V M V 7 M N M N 7 0 M M M V V 7 V V V 7 7 M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C Ci C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C m 00 m m C m mC� m Sri m w m m w 00 w m w m m m m m m m w m m mC� 00 w v v v v v v c c v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v c v v v v v v v v v v v v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P O P P P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M O O O O I� 0 r O O O M C, 0 0 0 m m P O N Q \ \ \ N N M M M N \ O N M \ \ O N N N \ M \ \ O N N M ,O O W W W W W W O O O O N N N N N M M M M M M 7 V V V L(J Q m z v L31 N Q N m m t V M U U U O LL Y @ C U m C m@ E m C o m ai o m E m L u m o m o m m m m 7 v n o N U Eol a °' to E m m z W N U R F Y Y c m� Y Y N '6 U C N @ N U a Q a s ii 'L c> m m cn cn m m Z) E W Q t) Q V) Q Q U z U ii iL W N M I 0'2 M �O 2 N O M I� � r'0 r m 0' P O m m N 'O I� m I m 'D � 7 M 'O m O O O O N N N M N W M M M W N N V � V l LO l Ln L .O 'O 'O I� n r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (n O a d 0 O O}❑ m n a� 2 x❑_ m z J X m c7 } O r U U U x W W X N❑ a J a �o t) Q m m U❑ 2 Q m U U K❑ 2 Q❑ z M m W N m m❑ m Q m m Q m .O ❑❑ Q M❑ w H N F U I� J m O N a' Q U C7 in S Q O U z> Q' m H 0❑ O O N H❑ m N N M �O W M I, W M O O N O 0 N 00 CD V NO 0 0 I� mCD m m m In N 7 �O I� ' M 7 P N 'D 0, N C P 7 0 N 7 0 N CD m 0 U ON CDM n M P M M 0 0 m m O O 0 m 0 P M M 0 0 m 0 0 ON O M M M M 153 Ln >. i+ C E N .= N > N CY J c 7 � - � O � O d t i p V � O O U) Li L R L O a in Ln Lc) LCJ 10 10 10 10 10 .o 10 10 10 10 10 .o .o 10 1010 r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M v v N N N N O N r O O O N CD M p, r M V O n W N O N O N O N N M N M N N O N O N O N O L!'1 �O r P N M V V V 7 O O r r P P N N N N N N N M M M O o r 0 O y 0 0 0 0 o o Ln 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn O O P �O LP in 00 P P r r cm) co O O P OO O O P W o0 00 O O O N M O N r O r P P �O r M r O N M M -It— O L 0' N M 00 O m of M r W w P 7 LP r r M 00 P N r w 00 w W 0, 0,O w N N M V � V V V 7 II) Ln LI LQ D ( "O r r r r r r r r W W w ,0 O r N 'O D O O D O N V D 0 O D O O O 'O M O 0 O O O D M N N r 10 N N O NNN N V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w cl N N 7 c0 0 V cc0 00 00 00 llO W W 00 00 00 N W O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO W t0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O m O Ln O O O O O O O O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O P r m Ln 00 P P r r O w O O P w P P r O O P w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c O c O c O O O c r O c c c c c c O c c c O O c c c O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln w P P w Ln Ln P m w w w w N N Ln w P w P L m Ln m P Ln Ln w w V V V V V 7 7 V'T 7 7 V � 7 7 V V � V V V 7 V 7 7 V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (N N P r O w u V r N P L O m L O O O 0 N O � P M �O O M N O P N .O M 07 O7 V Lf7 D v r r O W V M M M r OO 7 M V L U L V V N O r N N O r M M r M .0 t N M M 7 O 7 M M Lf) P M M 7 M r rO N M W N Lf) LA P M r OO M r r r 0 OO LA r m N Ln Lc1 N MO V �O �O V V 7 M W r r O O V 7 0 Ln M M N Lfi M P "0 m M P O O N N N 00 P M N m m m m m O P P O M M M M N N M M N M M M M M M N N M M M M M M M V M M 7 V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 C C 0 Lci w o, C� m Lo o` Lri of m of o` of m m of o; 00 C� m Lo m of Lri m of w V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M�� N N N �O N r O r N m M M� O r M 7 M M W 0' N N O Q— O N N M N O N N O N O N O N N— 0 0 Ln .O \ U \ N M 7 V 7 N I� r r \ \ N N N N N N M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 r 1 T P O N O N Y n m d7 f0 LL 0) T O c > c m 7 (n N Q O co, N R T S O O E O C > m o U o> c o? m o Y Z� L X N m a N> LL Y w C N 0 Z) E Y N m 00 O c U LUL fO H� :a m p m C O U y m Y Y c 3 N o Q f° '° LL U 2 c U c m c m 0> T c c °' m m o c O 0) R LL m O LL T R @ U Y— X �C L m to U z E- L CL o E m e a =- m E r i c n m m o o a �n Q E a Q o o � iv �� aci �¢ o °' o m -a U s o m >, o�� o E E o o m� R C R U LL a w z C7 H U i.i w> C7 cn cn U 25 U U H Q m m:3 m w Z r M L .D O M 7 �o r �D LP .0 r N 7 Ln O r M N O M r Ln M P r o0 �O M O O r N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M (n O O. d 0 O +R+ M U 'D O P r 0 W .O 0 0 O r W M N V R (n LL LL U J N U} Q> d Y LL P J Z m< LL d w w V Z J J Y m a U m H 2¢ W Q Y 0 Q U_ > K m a rn �= O P N r O � M Ln N r P O• P LA LCl .O M N l.t) .Cf r M A P .O Di Oi .� O r M r M N r u0 .O O] cD N 00 Ln r r O r O M N P P r P L!] N O In N u� l.t) r 0 0 00 r M M M r O l.t� O P 7 0 U P M r O] O M OJ M LL P M r CO N N o0 0 0 0 n N N P 0 A M M N M A n 49 N r M CD 0 CD M <V M MCN O 0 0 0 U " 00 U O O O IL N 00 LL Q 01 cv O d N N M d co O V O P N M V P O 00 M M n M V r O O 00 M P O N — N O O O O 0 0 ol P oo 00 r � 7 M O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 Ln Ln V d R 154 w T N O N rn m 3 ❑ m a m o N N LO r m } M 0 o O O r� Ci N N « �= r N N m N T 3 R jp V t0 E N IQ (D H r d � O .R a O N 7 6 O O OM O o w Y O O r o, f� Ln m 't oc� N 7 m O O O O W V O O N OI r Y � � to O w+ N N •� N O N 3 0 CD 0 ai a N m CD C CDu1 o r 1 . m O O 00 C C N i _ p V p p d d R O Li L Q U O �p d a o m m 0 o f`6 C y � O � > m Q m l~Cl O iZ O U U m N � y C W � C O N � m j � � a C c _ � m 0 c d E N � > C co O M � N d O z N � � lib N d a o o to i � U C) v lD N 0 0 O O O C P lT � N M M M M N N N O O N N (T T Ln Y7 M M V � M M u Y) N N O O N N n LQ M M V � M M n lh c 0 N N N O N O 0 v ci c0 ti cli N_ N m d F CO � N W a) U m V) > a Q W 6 g c m R U R 0 in LA 7 L m w IL O H � m L N w C) v} 0 0 O O O O � N co 00 M M M M 1p lb N N Ol T O O S IO] V � lb M M M M Co CO N N rn C O O a v W Go M M M M of o0 rn rn O O T 0 155 A N N O N C � 7 M LL CY•� i � i •L LL JLLJ _ N 0 c 0 N o � L C� G _d) C i 0 d CO m O, N D` n M I� O O V N 7 Ln CDN M Ln O I� M� O� Izi- M- O' N O O M M O �O O M O` M M O O` O N M O Ln Ln Ln V V I� M r Ln .O M Ln I� .p ON O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D` N P r M n O O V V N V 'O 'O O Ln M Ln M M n C O M V Ln O N M Ln �T - M C O 10 V M I� O V C N N M I O O M M O cO O M ow'M M �O I- t` D` O N M O Ln Ln Ln � 7 n M n Lo M m n2 D` M O I� M !T M O O I� N N M M Ol Ol O M U IT O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O Ln M O O O N Ln O O O O O u� O O O Ln 0 0 L. Ln O O In In Ln O r r O Ln O M N V M M N C M O` O` M O O N N M M O I- N M V O N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M O M M N N M M M M N 7 M CO 7 N 7 M O` M 7 7 7 O O N N M M O M N M 7 O N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M O M M N N M M M v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O o o o o o o o o o't o o o o o o o o o o 0` O O n O O O M M O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O M O O M N O O O O� M Ln O O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O O Ln Ln Ln Ln c� Ln co M Ln M Ln R V V C 7 V V C N V V C 7 V V C 7 V V Ln R V I C 7 V V Ln N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N M N N M N N N N N Ln O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N 0 0 0 M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M N O O O O: M Ln O O Lo Ln Lo Lo Lo I� Ln Lo O O Ln Lo Ln Ln Lo P Lo Ln co co r- Ln Ln co Ln 7 V C 7 V � C N V V C V V V C 7 V'T Ln 7 V I� C 7 V V Ln N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N M N N N N N N n Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O` O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O� O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O P � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M O O O O O O O O M p p p p O p O O O O M O O O O O O O cp M Ln O O Ln Ln Ln u� u� u� u� Ln O O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln P Ln Ln M O O u� Ln M Ln 7 V V 7 7 V V C N V V 7 7 V 7 C 7 V V Ln 7 V O Ln R V V Ln N C4 N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N M N N 7 N N N N N N r U z m J 2 Q o a = Q Q � Z m O M w CC m LL } ZMMO IL a Z 0� O a W z W J m r Q m > W LL CC d' U Z N = J Q F Q a Z Z Q Z= Z Q J U V) Q LLB Q U LL 0 a U Q Q m Y U W Y U Q U W LL Q a ULL U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O` In .O I O` 'a n O 4 O` M Ln c M V I M D` M 7 m n M O N Ln m D` U 1> 0` O O O N N N 7 7 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O O O O O O M C O M 0,M 0, N m V O. C, ^ M M N .p ^ M 0,Q D U W m d m 2 N} U` W 2 Y X m Z 0> O J d' � M Q LL J Q m U U Q Q Q Q m Q J m Q Q M Q CC [0 } Q W d r a m}} U Y Q M Ln d Q> O O O W N M M N M 7 M N M M} N �O N O N P} M 1� (T O V N O� P 'O } I� r P N O O 156 O` N 0 o o �O Y N N C VI O N M O I� M M �O O 0 Ol N N N IL rn c c 2 C > Y d C f1] m N O Ln .p N M u] M D` m P m O 'a D` r c a. P O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C V m M Cl O I- - 0 -- O C m �O O 'IT M m N � M O �O �a M I� V �O N m Ln � N- n M- N��- M N �a �O Ln N Ln V M P 7 N N N N m I� Ln .O Ic Ln a' N m a• m a a a` n U a` O O r Ln me n M N a` O O O 0 0 I� M w a m �O N N I� U N I� N M O m m I� m N N N N N I� m 0 'T LM Ln U zr I� LM LM O O Ln Ln O 7 O o Ln O Ln O O O N � O Ln 0 0 7 0 0 Ln Ln O O M Ln O O o oD to M V V M h 0 O` 7 a� m Il O` LM N V *a to M r tP to .O V m V M A N M O I� 0` O O O m M M M M M N M N N N N N M N N N N - N N N N - N N N N N N- N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LM LM O o Ln Ln O LM o LM o� o o LM O LM o 0 0 LM LM o LM 0 0 op O O LM LM O o Ln Ln O o 0 oM M 7 7 M I� O O` to m OR I- 0` LM N'j: LM M Ln Ln m-t M M O I- O• O O O m M M M M M N M � N �" N N N M N N N <N N N N N N N N N N N N � � N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O x O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C 0 C 0 0 0 0 Ln Lc m 0 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 Ln Ln 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 c 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O N Ln � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �D �a 0 0 0 0 LM 0 0 0 0 0 0 P O O O O LM oo x w Lci m m w Lci m rn m m m co Ln Ln m x Ln Lci m m of m m Ln m m Ln m x oo m rn � v v a v m m m v v � v v � rn a, � v v am � v v v of � v v a, N N N N N N N 7 t N N N N N N N N 7 N N N N - N N N N N N � N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LM in m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LM Ln O O O O O o o 0 0 0 o Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "ni 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 D` O O O O Ln m m m Ln m m m m m o` m m m m m m m .o ,o m n m m rn m m n m � m� m m m m o, C 1 -ITV C V V m al m V � C 7 V � C 7 al ol C V -ITV a, V V C 1 V ol C 7 V V U N N N N N N N V C 7 N N N N N N N N V V N N N N 7 N N N N N N -ZT N N N N C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m m Ln m m m O O O m m m m Ln Ln m m 0 0 Ln Ln m m 0 m m Ln m r m O m m m m O C R V V 7 7 V O O O V V 7 7 V V C R O O 7 7 V V O 7 V V 7 7 V O C 7 V V O N N N N N N N LM to LM N N N N N N N N to M N N N N M N N N N N N LM N N N N to U CC m 0 2~ J C7 p� d' Z Z 2 H O Q z O to Z (n U O� Z z W Z Q U �_ N a CO d p p U W W_j H r C' F Z Z J F- F a Z C7 U N W d > Q N H O U z z m�� 0 LLi Z) -> Z U a O 2 OU � D a m w-j LWi U Q 0 OU a Q Q LLJ � `r a LWi O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c C a o` O N M V Lo m a` o 7 m a m a` O N C m .O m a` O N M m a I m cl O N �a I� r r r n n r r m m m m m m m U 0: 0` a: a` O� a: a` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ N N N N N N N N N N N � O 47 a a X w Cx m¢ x a a m o v> ¢ a a a o a m m> m a o 0 aLn .Mo 0 Q m LJn < M w Lin < a m omo LQn > F- 0 3 V Ln Q` U V M N Ln r N 0 ,a D` C I� M N -M O M.M. , M mN_OMLL O � N N O O N �a O M 157 = Cl) Iq U) O : - T M - m � O r` M o m C[) .O M O r` r` - O .o I� m V � C 7 M O O } d 'P N 0) D` N M � M .O N , lO .O LA O O O C� CO M O M Il N Ln M Lq O• C�O M N C: U r rvi y0„ U ILC R W O N d N d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O C N R R W N N C a)C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O -` O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N U a � U Oa E a O O Cf O zVN M zO m O M m Lo 'o M O r` r` O .O I' m V � O 0 Ln Om MI- Nl�� 101O Un nOO N d N N Ln CtJ U N m O O m LO N �O N 7-- - M M M 7 V Ln C M M M M .p .O � M M M M M C M V M N V V M M M M M M M M coC C W � � NN O O O C, O O O N V O O O O O O O 0 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 OO OO n m n O CCO � r O O O CO O O n 0 0 d N 0 0 n n n n uO O O }N �O OMO`O`mmmU)CO.OI- rMLqrO`O`mPOLnPVC? CO R N N C C a N y O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CT 1` Cn O C[ CO O O O O O O cl 0 0 0 On 0 0 CO O O O M O CO CO LC) CO CO 0 0 0 CT CT m m OO r` �O I� O` CT m O• m Ln r` CT 7 Lp M U L 0) Gf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L ,� C 7 _; O O O O O O O O O O O O O CT V O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O M O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO O O O O O O O O O r` O O O r` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cy L W O O O O O O O O O O O N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O V rl O M Cl O CT C C 00 0 0 �O �C O O N C O O O O O O O lC J 0 Cr m O` a, 7 Ln m C` m CIS m m Il m m N 10 m m m m m m CL` m m C� C� m m m m m Ln m m W N O C 7 V C, C 7 V V C CIS P C M N V Cr CT -It V C 7 V V w CIS V C� O, � -It V C 7 V V C N N N N N N N N �t t N,CCr N Cf CT N N N N N N Cr CIS N C� CIS N N N N N N N N W O G m O aR w N F U L V R rnm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O O O O 't3) Y Co O m a a v rn a v v v a C,� a a m a rn a v v a a v a m al v rn rn a v a a a v v a N N N V N N N N N 7 V N N O O (N O` CP N N N N N N O` O, N P P N N N N N N N N CT O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y O C� C?O C? C� C?O C? C� C�O C�O� V C� C� C�O O C? C� C?O C? C� C�O O C� C� C� C� C� C�O C?. C 3 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 r- m O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 f6 O O O O O O O O O O O N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C)O O O �> O O O O O O O O O O O O M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C C O W Cr m O O 7 Ln m O` m O O m I- m m O O m Cc) Ln m m m O O m O O m m m Ln m Ln m m Li C R V O 7 7 V 7 C O O 7 M N V O Cl V V 7 7 V V O O V O O 7 V V C 7 V V C N N N M N N N N N M M N C O• N O O N N N N N N O O N O O N N N N N N N N �LLJ Y N > n Y U U z J j v) m U m d a w LL cn 0< H O D U Q Y H z U 2 LLJ O O N N~ N Q= W V) O W CL. Ln LUL W LUi LUi d' Z� J - W J7:1 m m d LL LL N 20� J Y In Z) LL LL LL LL Z) U fn N Q d N U U N N LL LL r C LL O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C N E N M Ln 2 r` m O` O N M V m O M m 'D r` m C' O N V 'O I� m CT O N M V LO 7 C 3 LL � N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M� 't 7� � 7 LO LO m m Ln LO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (a N N Qi = L() N M M N N .O In Ln O r` M O �O O .O m 0 0 m r` M O O'T M LO d 2 N Q= X Y r z m M X J m X i Y U i a H W U H r W ( � W (� 1 m O > z m J m a -i N O Y Y r U O Y m Q Z X L.L m J Lo i Q H d m CO 4 W W O N M N O 0 W r` O O M m N N W O` m N N 1p N O m M M C1� .O CT M M V I� .O m N I� N M CT M M .0 Cr Ln N r` 0' C M M Ln N C[1 M M �O l[) % M O M O P V r- Ln O N r` r r` N _ U =L I� CT M D` r` M M M M LA 0 0 0 M M M m �O �O C(J V I� P M CT M M M P M I� m m 0 C 1 �f J ..1� m rn IL rn c c 2 C i Y d C f1] m O L V T O O LM N O N W W O �u] Q M O -- O W M V M M N O W N N N M - O M O CD L � W � M N Q N W W N N O N- M N O� W M M M O M I M M M. O M O I� LM I� W N ry M O M ry M M M W p 0 W W M O O M LM LM W .O .O LM M p 'D M O O O N O O W O 00 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln V V O O Ln N O1 N W W M I� Ln W M V V M M O W N N N M .O I� O M O 01 N W W N N Ln N N O, N N N N O � W M M M O M I, M M MO M O I� LM I� W N N 7� M O M N M M 7 M W 0 0 W W M O O M lIJ Ln W O O LM M O M 7 N M W O O� U M N LM W N O N O O O n M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N LM N N N N C N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M n 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o O O Ln O Ln O LM o Ln Ln O o rn m Ic o 0 o Ln O O rn a Lo V V N M N *O N N Cl? N O O �O V co mL(') V l.[) lfi V LM ----- - - - - -- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LM O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O LM u7 O LE O O M O MO M O M M O O N O O W W O MO O O 0 N N 0 �M LM 10 N M M 7 N M N IM N N M N O O IO LM LM M LM LM US LM LM 7 LM ------ - - - - -- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M C 0 C O 0 0 0 C C C C 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 LM On 0 C C C 0 0 C 0 LM cl LM O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I� N N Ln W W W LM W 00 W W W W Ln c0 LM W .T W W LM 00 O O` 01 O O W W W co O O .T 61 01 0 C 7 V C V V 7 V V C -zll V V C 7 V V C 7 0 O` 01 0 0 V C -zll V 0 0 01 61 C� C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O-- LM M N N N N � � N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LM LM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LM LM LM M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W 0 0 0 0 0 W W W Ln LM W W W W W W W W Ln W Ln W Q W W LM W O a� Ol O O W W W W O O C 7 V V C V V V C 7 V C 7 V C 7 V V C V O Ol a, O OI:r C 7 V O O T O OW N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O V 7 LM M N N N N LM 0 7 V V I- 1- -7 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LM O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LM W W W Lo W W W W W W Ln W Ln W o W W Lo W O O O O O W W W W O O O O O O C R V 7 V 7 7 V V 7 7 V V C R V V 7 7 O O O O O V 7 7 V O O o O O C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O LM LM LM M N N N N LM O LM LM LM .O ry V) H W CD V) z U N❑ V) W 0] m N d~S Z W �p U Z F- U Q N Uj Z a Z 2 2 2 2 2>U OX r UU Q a W Z d' W U Q H Y Z Z Z Z Z ZV / V\ Q LL LL LL LL LL LL U Q V M LL LL LL LL LL m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C W O` O N M C M Q r W O, O N M V 'O W O, O N M T In c r W P O N M 3 LP m m LM ' 'o'o' 'o'o'o'c r r` r` r r n r` r r W W w W W W W W W W Ml U Ol O, LL N !V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (V N N N � O 47 LM O` W ^ r M M O 0,M N 0, `0 M O` M W �O M W O �O N ^ M W C Ln co M N m co Q LL¢ m U Q ca m a❑❑0 Q❑ M ❑Y ❑ Y S Y S a Q Q Q m LM Z� .O N M O O❑ Q' M Y Z W 7 N O O Y d H N CD ❑ W Z U` % J 1 J Q d p 0 O Q M` aj 3 C Q V I� N V Ln r W 7 V O N Ln O O N O W O O M M t2 M M Q� .O N V M M M M M = LL O 7 L.'1 N W �O � � r Ln Ln N O S W � I� N N M LM N � N � � � � � � � } 159 O W O W O W �O O O` �O O N �O O C M M M O M M M M M M O W O M M M M M V) LO m rn IL rn c c 2 C > Y d C f1] m O L O I n O- n N It LO P� O w I � w M� C O O N C N- O W It V -� 7 V I � L N CD u I M O N CD L a CD O` N. � �� OM I� M M O, � � N N m O N N O` N O O` LP V 10 V O N V LS> O C. O O O` W D` O• L O` O O co r LP LL� LC! N N Cl CO LP IS) 7 M M CT V W M M N N N N N M N N N N M T M N NO N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L.O O � - O I� r N 7 m a,10 O W n W W O C O O N 7 N- O o� T V � 0 1' V I 0 LP N O O Ln Ln M O N O-- O a, P N� a,C O� M I� M M O K C N N x O N N N O O O O� N O U LP O O N 7 Ln O I� U P m w I Ln Ln 2 N 2 N 0 0 N O NO2 u2 to IN 1 M 1 1 N O � � CO OO CT 7 02 M M � N � N N � N N M 10 M M .O � N N N � O` O O• N O O O• 0 0 0 I� N V N O` O O N O O N M V V O N O O O O O• O O O ro w rn a o I� v o 0 o w M Ln o Ln o w� o o� Ln Ln Ln v o 0 0 0 0 o o n M M LP M LP LP M Lf1 LP LP M Ln M M N Ln CT CT M I� r LP Il r n n n OJ O O V C r P .O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O —— O O O O O 0 Ln In o 0 0 o Ln o 0 o Ln o Ln In o 0 0 o Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o Ln � Ln o o � o � � Ln LO Ln o M n o o Ln Ln Ln LO Ln o o O O o o O n 7 LP LP M LP LP LO M LP M M N O O• O• M I- r n n n OJ O O 'j: n O` �O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O — O O O O O O O O O O O O— O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W 0 0 0 to O O O O O O O LP O O I� O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0o� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- O O P Ln Ln O O LO O � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O M O O O� 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O n lo N m � N r O O O O O O O O M V O O O O O O P M 13 LI O O O O O Ln Ln O V O'4M O O O O O O O O I r O O O O W O m L to r L M I O ol L N W W W V c` I� m I M W oo coW W x� L.C) L.O O` Or O O O O O` O C 1 P P P W r O C 7 O� V C O` O` Ol Or P c� C � -It V C O` V V C a, � m m m m 7 m N N� OT P m N N 7 N N 7 - 7 O` �t 7 O� N N N N N M N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o co o O O n o O O o 0 o O n O O n 0 0 0 O O O n O o 0 o O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O W Ln L.O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U M 7 O1 LA 0 0 0 0 0 O� I� r O O O O OO O o0 to Ln n Ln M I� O Q` to x V U r o0 Il M o� CO OO OO CO CO O• Ln Ln 31 0 0 0 0 Q• O N N P P P W Il O N N On N N O O IT Ol U P P N N N-ZT N N a N N N P 7 LP Lo Ln Lo V Lo N N V � C P P Ln N N V N N V V V U V V P N N N N N 7 N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O h O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O C O O O O O O Lr O O O O O O C O C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W to O o o o 0 o Ln O W m 07 o 0 0 0 0 0 W m w W o rn Ln Ln O O O o 0 o o O C 7 0 o o O O O C R o V 7 0 o o o o O 7 7 V V C O V V C O LP LP Lf) LP LP m m N N mm m O O mN N m N N m M M O M M O N N N N N M N N N Y m Q' z W z U U Q U U F N W N ~ Q Q Y Y (� x CO Q Q m a m m Of m N LL CC H W CC d' d' d' d' m z�� m N m H U J J J J H J p d' J F J H J z } H x H H F H H J p J O] O U z z x x z z x x L x z> x 0 V)= N x O N Q a NV) N ✓n � x 07 J Q¢ Y LL w} g LL LL LL LL LL LL D LL J W LL- D LL D LL (� H Z) U LL in Z) Z) Z) Z) Z) LL> (D V) H m LL d In m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � _ _ C I cc O N M 1' M �O I W O` O N M Ln �O I� W O O N M T M 'O W P O N M 3 O` O, U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N M M M M LL N !V " M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M � O 47 C P Cn r `D V m .O M O. M M W O O O` O, O O N a p >7 N N U N U J X fN x X I-- o, U} N¢> U H LL H LL LL j Y LL} 0 N LL a, Ln O U' W LL a U` � M Z U p W d M W Q> m Q Q Q m m U CD U ¢ X Q W N Q H Q � Q Q X `1 J U J U U J Q > Q U J J U M U U U U U W ¢ (7 0 U' ¢ N¢ I� O W O N W N¢ M Ln N N I� N N N N N Q a, Cn Lo W z W N Lo O 1p M M M M M M N M N M D` N M N M Ln N N 1 �O N N N N N N M LP LO M o M O• Ln _ LL m m n 4 } m N m- m c m O m o 160 M M M M M M� M Ln 0] M� O� M� M M CO U M (n U� P Cr P M� M n W O M I� O] O � rn C c 2 C i Y d C f1] m N II? LP I� M O [J O Lf) O M N .O I� m 0 M M O .O .D M M 0 7 M 0 CT Ln M O M M M O CT f` L27 O M to M M Ol.() 0 0 0 cN -1T W O N N N N N CT LC! cO W N M W L() O N N 7 O M � � N �� N LP m M� m M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N CA 7 r C M N 7 W M M O C0 70 O W M r` 7 M LO n M W l.C) .O N O N M O M M 0 LP N I- M �O �O W LQ O N M -O I- 0 7 7 7 �O M �O M 1p N llO M 0 7 M 0 CT Ln M N Ln M O O M I N W N O W W 0 7 M P O O O M- N 7 Lo �O M N M M M �O O M In M M N Ln O O O -o N �O 7 M Ln LIn � W U Ln .O W �O I� r Ln O N N N 7 N 7 W N N O M n N N � N N Ln LA M NN M O M N N V r r n CT 'O O O n r'o' r N r M N O O r W O W N O N Cf 'O 'O O M O 0 7 Ln W CT M om. N N N 7 0 0 W r N N N Ln 7 0 Ln O CS N O W C` Ln O n N N CT O M O CO I� CT I� �O <]` � � � � N �O � � � � N LA tP CT O N W M M 'O O` 7 �O I- r� LC) O` o Ln O O O O O� Ln Ln O O O O O Ln Ln Ln O O O O O O O O Ln Ln O O O Ln O O O O O O N Lt! O O P . . N N r O O O W N N N Ln O r O rr Ln O r n t O O N O M O O O W O n O (%! O` � N n N N Ln LP O� O N W M M 1O CT to K) n CO Ln 17` 0 0 0 — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — —— 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 O O O O O O O LT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r O O O O O O O O O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O W W O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O M O O W M O C` O N O o 0 0 M �O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O W CT 'O O O CT n O O O O O r- Ln O O N O r- O% M 0 0 0 Ln Ln 7 0 W M 0 0 0 � O W O M O O Ln O O r- O W M W O W cT r O CT W CT co 'o LP O of r 'oO co c� of 'O V r CT O r LP O m 'o Ln 7 W Co O` O, C` O` C` (, C� O 7 7 CT Ol CT CT CT W W r O 7 7 Cr W CT W O� 7 O W 7 O 7 W 7 N CT CT CT Cr CT 7 7 C, CT O N N 7 CT cT � CT CT CT a, O N N o, 7 7 7 M N O 7 CT O N CT N O O o 0 0 0 a O O O O O O O n n O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O W W O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O Lc! O O W Ln O P O N O O O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln O W q 0 0 0 Cr L 0 0 0 0 O I� LP O O N O n O M 0 0 0 Ln LA r� O W 7 M 0 0 0 r O W M O O n LP O O n O W M W P W Cl n c O Cr W a, co 'O Ln O of r 'o O co a� CT �O V n Ol o t` LP O Ln .O Ln 7 W W of U CT Cl of (T Ol 0 7 7 Ol CT cT CT CT W W r` 0 7 7 of W LT W O� 7 0 W 7 0 7 W 7 N CT CT Ol o' CT 7 7 CT CP O N N 7 CT CT CT CT CT CT CT O N N O` 7 7 7 M N O 7 CT O N CT N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P W O O O O O O O O O W rn 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O Ln O Lr! 7 O O O O O O O O O O 7 7 O O O O O O O O O 7 7 O O O O O 7 O O O O 7 O 7 N 0 0 0 0 0 M M O O O N N Lc! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 M M Lc! a N O M O O N O N W Y z V) U U U LLLI U Y F O N V) 2 LL 2 LL_ V) V) V) LL_ ¢ 2 LL_ V) V) V) V) 2 Z LL U Z 2 2 0 2 2¢ 2 Z 2 2 a V) W U Z) Z) LL LL LL LL Z) Z) Z) LL U LL LL Z) Z) Z) Z) LL LL LL J U LL LL Z) LL LL LL LL LL LL LL H Z) m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 7 L .O C W CT O N M 7 L .O I W CT O N M 7 M .O n W C, O N M 7 Ln 'O W C, O 3 M M M M M M 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 LP LA m Lo Lo m L Lo Lo LP LL M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M � O G7 a� 2 x v z ow M C7 Z M> H n Q CC 5 CM7 z a U>> LL cc D O Q E W L^LJ ;ten x U m p U a-0 H `� CO M m U m m N .p U' d. ¢ LL W M V) ¢^ o ¢UUa arc.. NNANazUNNN< zo,m< cj �_ao�< clj a � O N N a W a W N N N W M N Q W N N N N a C� W U Ln Q (.� N W i.� Q (.� (� ¢ .O N � 1p 3 I� N N M M M M N N N M O O M M N N N N M M M W M M N M M r M M M M r` N M LL o o m m o o 0 m m m m rn 8 161 N � CT M M M M (T fP CP M Ln M M�� � CT M M M Ln N M M P M M M M M M M W � O N IL Z N G C C a N C 0 C ` R N � lk 7 R M U 01 L N 3 ' L Cy C 2 W > i Y w W N C O R N m w N i3 L 1`a rn am C 3 C i Y O O mm a U � M N n C n n CT - ; P � n M m O O N N M (T Lq .O n 1 n . M r s N M M O O cT Q1 Ln N CT 'D N N O O M l.n O M c0 M OM O O r ti N I N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I o o I o o I o o I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O O 1 O O 1 O O 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C O O ,O M N r C r r - (T r M CA O O N N M CT Ln .O r V r C (T M n C ON M M O O N CA M CO M M O O n ti (T M Ltl O O O LC) C%J O N (T r ti M M M C M M N r r lD O co co O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 n m M n O N N N O O O O O O O O O O CT ID r O OJ O CT CD n uC co O t` O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In O �n O O O O O O O 0 0 0 LC) N O r to (T n n O O O (T (D n to M O O O O O O O O O O r: N O O O O O O O O O O O O W O O D M O O O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D lti O CO p CO Co _O O O O O O O O O O CT N O O O O O O O O O O V M 0 0 0 O CO N N n CA L() L() P O l.() L() L() m w M W P W N co v o a v v ,D r` rn rn� N N N O N N N N N f t 0 CT N M F` o 7 � CA O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v _ M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO Cfl 0 0 0 0 O O O O � r- � LC1 to to O v M Cl) O C 1 V O N N N O N n 00 n 00 O 1- V F O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) <M O O O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C (n CA N N r O O 0 0 0 0 Cp O W C R V 0 7 7 V 7 C 0 0 m 0 7 N N N O N N N N N M M n O N C1 CM O 7 � � O W O O N N M M O O M O 000 V 00 M M W W W 00 v COD O O y Z F O a W Q J O F J z a 0] Z F>= a a a a R z R Q R a R F Q a F J J J J N F F F F F} 2 w U' W W a ac 0 0 0 to O CO O U a O LL O W 2 LL CO Q C6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M V N LL T 'O L O O m W (D W CO CYJ � LA aL.+ � �O O LL M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Q1 O Q O c C W GQ m Np Q An O J U C9 Q U Q U¢ Q U U 0} 0 m y a J o, U U U CD J LL co = N p n Q M a, N N N N m $ M i n O O M r M w N M M M O Clr �- N N N NO r N r 7 -ITO O C 7 LI)C } 3 } L 7 M =L O O LA M N D N to (T A - LL N LL (/1 C= N 0 O O 00 O m 0 162 y m a` rn o co rn rn N m O d N v o 0 M rn rn W? U Z£ o O O N O L(1 M V ti a oo O N O P 7 I.Si M O U Q^ lO O v M N Do N Q N O > J � o a a U P O co P P N O` O w w N 7 O O o0 o� P N N n 7 N o �1 M 4 n r 3 N oo O N m U V 'D L[1 M In M I- r--, -cl c,N V N M 2 A O O OO N M CO D OO O OD In a s a o a a a a a r N y o, l(J O• O co U c, N o, O N 7 O O OO O, c� 'O N N N O N P 'D m M N 15 M r r- r U Nlzz N In O O 0 0 o o o o 0 O N O O 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 3 = O O o 0 o O o m o O i .3+ O O O 0` O 0 0 0 Q O A op to N YO 7 O- bo � 7 co V N C N N N 7 N N N N N C m t6 fy N Cl) t V i o 0 m 0 0 O O O o N CC o o �n O o 0 0 0 yJ G �� 0` Ln N M M IO m M N � M I N N N M f0 N O N i6 m of co o` o o o _• 'L GI N N N N J +^+ d o 0 O O o o o 0 0 'i C N N N N N N N N N 3 � N N N N N N N N N N\ \ N N N N\ N C R O �O co OO O L V •� O O N � � N N N M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 o O N O O o c C O c 0 0 O ++ (o O O O oO co Ln oO O d 31 N N N O N N N N N a m O N E a N J Qp w Q U_ m ❑ p Z Q J❑ F •7 H O �m ❑ a -j m U 0 2 m v� U U U U U U U U U o CO H a c u- LL — o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LKJ d co lO I.(J r N Ln •O N N N N _ M N N O O M N cl M N z} �} Y z❑ X U o m w m d U d N m a N W �p N n r �(J M M N O N O T �w Noo 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O � O I: N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 m 0 0 ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C CO O P O O m O Ln P N O C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 C 0 C� O O M O I- O LQ O DD m I� V M O 0 O � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Y `O 0 I� 0 L7 0 r 7 10 10 M m P W P l.[) In P L[) Ln L() L7 IS) m m m OD m P 0 m 0 V 0 � P m �O I� P P V 7 7 V V 7 7 V V C 7 V p0 M O O P O r N N N N N N N N N N N N 5 _T U M O N O O O O O O O O M O O M F O N M O O M I O M m Ln Ln Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln N Lq 7 m m r-: OR M M M 7 P BO O� P P C! m o P m o O N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V N N N N N M N \ M M N M O O O N N W R N O m O O m O O O Ln O O m O m O O O O O O O O O O O O N m M .p ,p m O O M O^ N O M P BOO P P 0 m O P m 0 N R 7 a N 41 -O a a -6 "O O -O z "O -O m -0 O L 0 N N N N (1) O O O O O O N O R > > > > > > > > > > > C C i U U U U U U U U U U U O N O7 O7 N N d O) d d O O) a cc cc m iR �, p V a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ja 'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m O m 0 0 OR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O_ N O V �O u� 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'V R O P O P O I� O m 0 M P N W 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C L O O M O r- O Ln O W m r- a M O O a 0 Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, C,Ln Ln Ln Ln m m m N a m m P 0 m 0 V O CD P ma I� P P V 7 7 V V C 7 V V C 7 V 3 CV a uS v C O CV LL N Q 0 V (D L L O 1 T T T T Wj�/ r �C y m O m m L L M M N N P L LL C a N N N N N M N\ N M N M C O C N N O O O C C C �j G O � O O N O� N O N O N O O N N O N N M M M O O O N c o o F o 0 0 o o o :5 o o 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 J C,Uw :3 CV E m r n N O O V n O O V C V M M N N P O O V/ 0 CN � N N M M M M\ O 0 V I� V 00 M W 0 0 W 0 W 0 N 0 c M W W 0 P P 0 0 0 � d 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N L O) O O o O O O o o O O O O O O O O O o o O O O O O O o r R R N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U i n n m O O A O N N M M V W M M N N P 7 O N N N N O N N 0 0 0 li a O N NO NO N M M M M N N N N N M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O R N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O to R c R o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a>> o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a ri ri co co O a Ln m V O L[) 0 0 0 01 Ln O L.() Ln I- O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ln U U U U Y LLIYOF-:I Q J O 7 J J J J J J J F H H F F H j Z r Q Q J J J V7 } N 2 2 2 2 Z 2 2 2 N (n N (n N N Q LLI N LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL N 7 S S 7 coLLQ m m W Z U Z) `C J ci 47 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U m H LL LL LL LL LQL LQL LQL LQL a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2i 2 2 2 a c L o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J} N C :L- E no V7 N O P N O P O N M M m N M O 'O I� m P V � N m .O r += m �m m m �O �O I� r r r r r r r r m C M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M o N 0 O � U C a a o a W M In m LL fLL Q }�Q ¢m 0, a Q d d 0 2 d> Q U` Q O N N N N N N N w n 7 M P lfi N I� V O Ln O V R m m m m m m m m N n n O M n M m N O M M M M M M N O) O P N P 0 O U LL M M M M M M M M H P P C), 0, 0,P U 1 m O �n 0 N �O N C,lA lfi N 0 164 of N O) G7 CD C. 0 GO 6i i O N aw Ln Cl) 0 o 0 0, � [il N N F Y -;_ a� C S a N N O N M +R+ 0 L O C Q- i M d a (7 ac 2 R N C m s N d C1 IL r H �• R ° � � c 3 i C 3 R a R G C_ n 0 N m In N M 0 v 165 Ln U) Ln 12000 0 4-0 0 N 0 ON u 0 E ,-4 r, 4 r, Ln m 4 ('14 Ln CW r" co Y) Ln (N 4 (N (N 0 m ('14 Lr) (Y) �D co 'q- co 6 coven m Ch lD (,N Ln (,N m U) 0 0 0 ry) (,,4 Ln ,4 ' 0 (Y) Cj 0 �4 'j ("4 �'j ry Ln Jo �0, �C-'C N to, eoll' 0� ADD (10c, -,Oe Ic, ocl' or C, < 0 �-o F-; � e0c, OC, eoc-I ct, oe� eoll. 0 o �o oe 0�1 ------ I �l ----- -d : .......... . . ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- .............. .............. . 10 0 oe oe OC, -'OF 0 9 1,0c, �6cl C.% ocl. Ln m rlJ Ul) rl� LI) N Lo (,W rlj Lr) rll� Ln c4 LI) rV Lr) rl� LI) 6 L) rJ m r"I r14 rH aH CD 0 City Qt.jiata FIFY COUNCIL IEIE'1"LI G June 7, 2022 _I" 0 FF IRI I ' IR I" C�I�]►C.��►��iL1��►17931j;ju■►"6 N&7 AGENDA "II""'1'TILIIE: RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED MARCH 31, 2022 R IE C N' I IE IN ID T'1 N Receive and file revenue and expenditure report dated March 31, 2022. E E C 1")'T'1 E SlYM14ARY • The report summarizes the City's year-to-date (YTD) revenues and period expenditures for March 2022 (Attachment 1). These reports are also reviewed by the Financial Advisory Commission. I ' u °C L IP `Y' - None B C lK IR "' IN ID kNALYSIS Below is a summary of the column headers used on the Revenue and Expenditure Summary Reports: Original Total Budget - represents revenue and expenditure budgets the Council adopted in June 2021 for fiscal year 2021/22. Current Total Budget - represents original adopted budgets plus any Council approved budget amendments from throughout the year, including carryovers from the prior FY. Period Activity - represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid in the reporting month. Fiscal Activity - represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid YTD. Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) - represents the dollar difference between YTD collections/expenditures and the current budgeted amount. Percent Used - represents the percentage activity as compared to budget YTD. 167 March 2022 Revenues Comparison to LY Percent of YTD Percent MTD YTD Budget YTD of Budget General Fund (GF) $5,010,140 $44,904,294 68.670/o $ 33,707,642 58.43% All Funds $10,350,533 $74,252,490 49.81% $ 68,251,817 39.260/b March 2022 Expenditures Comparison to LY Percent of YTD Percent MTD YTD Budget YTD of Budget General Fund $8,622,674 $31,726,776 44.92% $ 26,709,649 40.30% Payroll (GF) $2,682,730 $9,675,373 84.36% $ 6,836,175 66.00% All Funds $20,480,880 $72,030,939 44.85% $ 78,366,092 41.98% General Fund Non -General Fund Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax $ 1,791,106 Lighting and Landscape Fund - Transfer In(l) $1,285,000 Measure G Sales Tax $ 1,192,335 SilverRock Greens Fees $ 647,877 Sales Tax $ 1,002,774 Technology Support Internal Service Fund(2� $ 438,675 Building Permits $ 170,387 Gas Tax Fund $ 329,229 Document Transfer Tax $ 113,409 Developer Impact Fees- Transportation $ 327,638 General Fund Non -General Fund Sheriff Contract (November/December/January) $ 2,415,310 Land Acquisition -Low/Mod Housing $8,600,550 Transfers Out $ 2,082,000 Debt Service Payments- Successor Agency Bonds(" $1,783,153 Liability Insurance & Claims(3) $ 132,250 SilverRock Maintenance $ 142,661 Community Experiences $ 94,655 Facility & Fleet Maintenance $ 106,425 Park Equipment Maintenance(3) $ 87,500 Software Licenses $ 68,328 ('Transfer in from the General Fund for median improvement projects and general operations. (Z)Internal Service Funds are used to account for activities involved in rendering services to departments within the City; quarterly journal entries move revenue into these funds. (3)These charges in the General Fund represent quarterly contributions to the Internal Service Funds. (4)Interest and principal payments for redevelopment bonds, funded by dedicated Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) revenue. The revenue report includes revenues and transfers into funds from other funds (income items). Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City's cash flow reserve. The expenditure report includes expenditures and transfers out to other funds. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Attachment 1: Revenue and Expenditure Report for March 31, 2022 ta Qa�tra .- gINAN(, . Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND 201 - GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEASU 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FU 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 223 - MEASURE A FUND 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 226-EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 227 -STATE HOMELAND SECURITY[ 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMI( 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FUI` 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FL 249-SA2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUI 250-TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 251 - PARKS & REC DIF FUND 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL CEI 255 - STREET FACILITY DIF FUND 256- PARK FACILITY DIF FUND 257 - FIRE PROTECTION DIF 270-ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 275 - LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER 299 - INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO( 405 - SA PA 1 CAPITAL IMPRV FUND 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMEI 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 504- INSURANCE FUND 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLA 761 - CERBT OPEB TRUST 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST Report Total: ATTACHMENT 1 For Fiscal: 2021/22 Period Ending: 03/31/2022 Revenue Summary Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 58,804,210 65,392,532 5,010,140 44,904,294 -20,488,238 68.67% 1,965,880 1,965,880 329,229 1,340,192 -625,688 68.17% 2,850,700 2,851,900 1,545 38,389 -2,813,511 1.35% 5,000 5,000 0 1,236 -3,764 24.73% 151,000 151,000 0 -107 -151,107 0.07% 101,000 101,000 8,333 112,512 11,512 111.40% 2,274,700 2,274,700 1,285,000 1,796,286 -478,414 78.97% 70,000 70,000 6,694 41,364 -28,636 59.09% 1,567,000 1,567,000 233,309 1,028,613 -538,387 65.64% 100 100 0 78 -22 78.21% 12,000 12,000 0 28,845 16,845 240.37% 5,000 5,000 6,018 6,018 1,018 120.36% 19,200 19,200 2,067 14,648 -4,552 76.29% 0 0 3 7,181,309 7,181,309 0.00% 52,800 52,800 12,483 26,184 -26,616 49.59% 0 0 0 741 741 0.00% 871,400 1,241,400 192,807 1,484,214 242,814 119.56% 35,000 35,000 0 11,371 -23,629 32.49% 30,000 30,000 70,208 163,124 133,124 543.75% 201,000 201,000 8,355 24,445 -176,555 12.16% 428,000 428,000 327,638 1,980,553 1,552,553 462.75% 351,000 351,000 153,972 580,578 229,578 165.41% 152,000 152,000 98,679 416,606 264,606 274.08% 50,000 50,000 29,024 109,383 59,383 218.77% 72,000 72,000 69,892 262,726 190,726 364.90% 0 0 1,495 33,242 33,242 0.00% 0 0 0 67 67 0.00% 66,000 66,000 30,943 136,771 70,771 207.23% 130,000 130,000 63,756 181,309 51,309 139.47% 2,600 2,600 2,000 2,200 -400 84.61% 0 0 152,471 351,194 351,194 0.00% 1,100 1,100 0 0 -1,100 0.00% 9,894,806 62,391,518 10,980 4,761,291 -57,630,227 7.63% 0 0 0 2,433 2,433 0.00% 1,222,750 1,222,750 307,637 919,848 -302,902 75.23% 1,786,700 1,786,700 441,375 1,342,894 -443,806 75.16% 400,000 400,000 87,500 349,905 -50,095 87.48% 1,010,800 1,010,800 252,500 757,653 -253,147 74.96% 4,157,693 4,187,693 1,306,730 4,223,312 35,619 100.85% 67,000 67,000 62,000 64,113 -2,887 95.69% 6,000 6,000 5,000 5,325 -675 88.75% 80,000 80,000 -101,301 -24,286 -104,286 30.36% 700,000 700,000 -117,950 -408,383 -1,108,383 58.34% 89,594,439 149,080,673 10,350,533 74,252,490 -74,828,183 49.81% � mi.s, are suhl c•9 to ad g u50a rag � rwlru aar rrwal ,��ww..w+Hw 1��(re 1 9 �^°�; +�� .wl d; arraw(�r���,h ramwdvwn I arlA:'�a� N e(:a nL' (row¢��,N'�^�hc+� ��arrrrww'wll,,����,. '�s Lho �:(r s. r� m,��mwl ce .Tara¢¢,�, Ii)w AI fin aV �:aw..w fik-:l nuraw(,em 169 ta Qa�tra .- gINAN(, . For Fiscal: 2021/22 Period Ending: 03/31/2022 Expenditure Summary Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Fund Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 101 - GENERAL FUND 55,162,726 70,624,237 8,622,674 31,726,776 38,897,461 44.92% 201 - GAS TAX FUND 2,007,500 2,984,683 169,836 1,146,508 1,838,175 38.41% 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 4,306,510 4,732,500 121,646 518,569 4,213,931 10.96% 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEASU 0 286,397 0 171,452 114,946 59.86% 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 148,350 148,350 1,530 1,530 146,820 1.03% 212-SLESA(COPS)FUND 100,000 100,000 15,297 19,873 80,127 19.87% 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FU 2,257,400 2,257,400 175,191 1,418,145 839,255 62.82% 220-QUIMBYFUND 0 1,180,635 0 330,300 850,335 27.98% 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 150,000 150,000 3,735 19,956 130,044 13.30% 223 - MEASURE A FUND 1,220,500 2,614,501 0 322,361 2,292,140 12.33% 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 0 22,618 0 0 22,618 0.00% 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT F 12,000 12,000 0 9,750 2,250 81.25% 227 -STATE HOMELAND SECURITY[ 5,000 5,000 0 0 5,000 0.00% 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 5,600 5,600 0 0 5,600 0.00% 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 0 0 1,783,153 15,285,742 -15,285,742 0.00% 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 42,500 42,500 649 14,620 27,880 34.40% 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMII` 0 0 0 3,500 -3,500 0.00% 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,542,200 1,542,200 107,322 821,642 720,558 53.28% 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FW 250,000 250,000 0 700 249,300 0.28% 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple) 0 160,000 68,328 81,995 78,005 51.25% 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FL 21,500 21,500 0 16,763 4,737 77.97% 249-SA2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUI 20,000 20,000 8,600,550 8,631,095 -8,611,095 43,155.48% 250-TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 604,500 1,816,757 0 400,000 1,416,757 22.02% 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 30,000 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL CEI 125,000 125,000 0 0 125,000 0.00% 270-ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 127,000 742,700 12,238 87,527 655,173 11.78% 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT 1,100 1,100 0 0 1,100 0.00% 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO( 9,894,806 60,540,692 100,043 4,201,619 56,339,072 6.94% 405 - SA PA 1 CAPITAL IMPRV FUND 0 1,128,751 0 997,179 131,572 88.34% 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMEI 1,222,750 1,319,714 76,741 500,495 819,219 37.92% 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,786,700 2,256,627 74,594 964,815 1,291,812 42.75% 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 255,000 255,000 0 115,219 139,781 45.18% 504- INSURANCE FUND 936,800 936,800 62,294 927,173 9,627 98.97% 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 4,161,262 4,191,262 449,742 3,206,277 984,985 76.50% 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 100.00% 760-SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLA 12,850 12,850 0 12,833 17 99.87% 761 - CERBT OPEB TRUST 1,500 1,500 427 1,322 178 88.15% 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 52,000 52,000 4,890 45,201 6,799 86.93% Report Total: 86,463,054 160,600,875 20,480,880 72,030,939 88,569,936 44.85% aC _,Ubl,4.t tx) adjusting cntres ^::rug) au(flt. IIP:e Ot s ,+'Mr°W0)rnpmh cnsas "'c II:.�nan InaI IfR,e(w, )ft, (::Isbi show �i) IrW3B"y, Is tha bi:i.si ttlapla,, (v:rl aH fln aV aU(fltCd uue,ara hers, P^I q, 2 r:)d 3 170 Fund Descriptions Fund # 11 Name Notes The primary fund of the City used to account for all revenue and expenditures of the City; a broad 101 General Fund range of municipal activities are provided through this fund. 201 Gas Tax Fund Gasoline sales tax allocations received from the State which are restricted to street -related ___ _________________ __ __ __________________________________________________________________________ expendituresw_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __ ___ ___ 202 Library and Museum Fund Revenues from property taxes and related expenditures for library and museum services. 203 Public Safety Fund General Fund Measure G sales tax revenue set dfpublic safety expenditures. _______________________ 210 ______________________________________________________ Federal Assistance Fund .-General -Fund Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) received from the federal government and the ..................................... expenditures of those resources. 21 212 SLESF (COPS) Fund n Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds SLESF) received from the State for law enforcement pp ( ) _________________ __________________________________________________________________________ acti_v_itiesw Also known as Citizen's_Option ior_Public Safety__(COPSIw__________________________________________________________ 215 Lighting & Landscaping Fund Special assessments levied on real property for city-wide lighting and landscape maintenance/improvements and the expenditures of those resources. 220 Quimby Fund Developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and ___ _________________ __ __ __________________________________________________________________________ improv_ementsw _____ __ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___ 221 AB939 Fund/Cal Recycle Franchise fees collected from the city waste hauler that are used to reduce waste sent to landfills throuqh recvclinq efforts. Assembly Bill (AB) 939. 223 Measure A Fund County sales tax allocations _______________________ 224 _____________________________________________________________ TUMF Fund __________________________________whicharerestrictedtostreet-relatedexpenditures._______________________________________ Developer -paid Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) utilized for traffic projects in Riverside County. 225 Infrastructure Fund Developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined ___ _________________ _______________________________ ____________________ ____ __ __ ______ ______ ______ _ __ ___ by__Resolution_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 226 Emergency Mgmt. Performance Grant (EMPG) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 227 _______________________ State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP) _________________________________ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. -F-edera-l--E-m-e-rg-e-n-cyMana--g-e-m-e-n-t-Agenc-y--(FEM-A)-g-ra-n-t-for-emerg-e-n-cy-pre-pare-d-n-ess 230 CASP Fund, AB1379 / SB1186 Certified Access Specialist (CASp) program fees for ADA Accessibility Improvements; derived from Business License renewals. Assembly Bill (AB) 1379 and Senate Bill (SB) 1186. Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund (RORF) for 231 Successor Agency PA 1 RORF Fund Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) taxes received for debt service payments on _________________ __________________________________________________________________________ _recognized_obligations_of the former Redevelopment_Acrency_i_RDAs_________________________________________________________ 235 SO Coast Air Quality Fund (AB2766, PM10) Contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Uses are limited to the reduction and control of airborne pollutants. Assemblv Bill (AB) 2766. 237 Successor Agency PA 1 Admin Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 for administration of the Recognized Obligation Payment ________________ ___________________________________________------------------------------ Schedule_(ROPS _associated_with _the _former _Redeyelopment Agency_. RDA1w____________________________________________ 241 Housing Authority Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. 243 RDA Low -Moderate Housing Fund Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. _________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Accounts_for_RDA loan_repayments_20 /o_for_Housing)_and_housing_programsbw_____ _ _____ ____________ 244 Housing Grants Activites related Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) and SB2 grants for housing planning and .... ... .... .... .... .... .... development. .... 247 Economic Development Fund Proceeds from sale of City -owned land; transferred from General Fund for future economic ___ _________________ __ __ ______ _____ _____ _____ _________________ ____ ____ ___________________________ development_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __ ___ ___ 249 SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond Fund Successor Agency (SA) low/moderate housing fund; 2011 bonds refinanced in 2016. 250 _______________________ Transportation DIF Fund ________________________________________________ Develoimpact fees collected improvements ____________per___________________________________forspecificpublic -transportationrelated. _______________________ 251 Parks & Rec. DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks and recreation. 252 _______________________ Civic Center DIF Fund ___________________________________________________________ Developer impact esimprovements C ________________f______________escollected for________________pecificpublic -_____ivicCenter--------------------------------------- 253 Library Development DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - library. 254 _______________________ Community Center DIF Fund _____________________________________________ Developer impact fees collected __________________________________________________forspecificpublic improvements -community center. _____________________________ 255 Street Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - streets. 256 _______________________ Park Facility DIF Fund ________________________________________________________ Develoimpact esimprovements ____________per____f______________escollected for_____________________pecificpublic -parks. _________________________________________________ 257 Fire Protection DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - fire protection. 270 Art In Public Places Fund Developer fees collected in lieu of art placement; utilized for acquisition, installation and maintenance ___ _________________ __ __ __________________________________________________________________________ of_public_artworksw __ ____ ___ __ ____ __ __ _ ____ ____________________________________________ ________ ________ ________ ________________ __________________________ ___ 275 LQ Public Safety Officer Fund Annual transfer in from General Fund; distributed to public safety officers disabled or killed in the line of duty. .... 299 Interest Allocation Fund Interest earned investments. _______________________ 310 ____________________________________________ LQ Finance Authority Debt Service Fund ________on__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Accounted for the debt service the Financing Authority's outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. Thisbond was fully paid in October 2018. 401 Capital Improvement Program Fund Planning, design, and construction capital projectsthroughouttheCity------------------------------------ _________________ 405 ______________________________ SA PA 1 Capital Improvement Fund __________________________________________ofvarious Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 bond proceeds restricted by the bond indenture covenants. Used for SilverRock infrastructure improvements. 501 _______________________ Equipment Replacement Fund ______________________________________________________________________________ Internal Service Fund for vehicles, heavy equipment, and related facilities. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 502 Information Technology Fund Internal Service Fund for computer hardware and software and phone systems. 503 _______________________ Park Equipment & Facility Fund ___________________________________________ Internal Service Fund for park equipment facilities ___________________________________and .______________________________________________________________________________ 504 Insurance Fund Internal Service Fund for city-wide insurance coverages. 601 _______________________ SilverRock Resort Fund __________________________________________________ Enterprise Fund for activities- of the city -owned golf course. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 602 SilverRock Golf Reserve Fund Enterprise Fund for golf course reserves for capital improvements. 760 Supplemental Pension Plan (PARS Account) Supplemental pension savings plan for excess retiree benefits to general employees of the City. 761 Other Post Benefit Obligation Truount) st (OPEB) For retiree medical benefits and unfunded liabilities------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 762 Pension Trust Benefit (PARS Acc For all pension -related benefits and unfunded liabilities. 171 Page 3 of 3 172 �„°' w�La Q ."' CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 16 nFlFY COUNCIL IEIEl"IIIIG June 7, 2022 SI.. 0 1F IR.IE IR I" , IIEIINIDA 'rriI""I IE:� APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED MAY 13, 20, & 27, 2022 Demand of Cash: City Successor Agency of RDA Housing Authority C Ii.I i IR "" [ IN ID N IYS'1 S $ 2,396,690.77 $ 2,300.00 $ 32,974.67 $ 2,431,965.44 Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for May 13, 20, & 27, 2022. Warrants Issued: 207750-207808 207809-207877 EFT # 119 207878-207950 Wire Transfers Payroll Tax Transfers Payroll Direct Deposit $ 253,922.72 $ 547,159.28 $ 378.80 $ 630,115.61 $ 512, 808.64 $ 78,153.48 $ 409,426.91 $ 2,431,965.44 173 The most significant expenditures on the demand registers are: Vendor Account Name(s) Visit Greater Palm Springs TBID Due To VGPS Spohn Ranch, Inc. Construction National Auto Fleet Group Vehicles Amount Purpose $ 183,120.10 Q3 FY 21/22 STVR TBID Collections $ 112,960.79 X-Park Construction $ 100,844.04 Purchase Two Fleet Upfitted Vehicles Coachella Valley Assoc of TUMF Payable to $ 85,778.60 April TUMF Fees Government CVAG Vintage Associates(l) Landscape Contract & $ 76,794.67 May Park Landscape Materials/Supplies Maintenance Payments were made on 5/13/22, 5/20/22, & 5/27/22 Wire Transfers: Sixteen transfers totaled $512,809. Of this amount, $398,888 was to Landmark, and $41,101 was to CalPERS. (See Attachment 2 for a complete listing). Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions as well as total holdings are reported quarterly in the Treasurer's Report. Settle Coupon Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Date Rate Maturity United States Government Treasury $ 500,000 5/15/22 1.750% Maturity Kansas Statebank CD $ 245,000 5/17/22 2.100% Purchase Greenwood's State Bank CD $ 248,000 5/17/22 3.050% Purchase Discover Bank CD $ 245,000 5/24/22 3.100% Prepared by: Jesse Batres, Account Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Attachments: 1. Demand Registers 2. Wire Transfers 174 ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta Demand Register Packet: APPKT03133 - 05/13/2022 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 207769 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101-0000-20985 221.25 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 207804 CONTRIBUTION United Way Deductions 101-0000-20981 37.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 207764 03/2022 - PUBLICATIONS Advertising 101-6002-60450 441.00 WILLDAN 207807 03/2022 - PW ONCALL MAP CHECKING SV... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 2,593.50 WILLDAN 207807 02/26-04/01/22 - ONCALL TRAFFIC ENGIN... Contract Traffic Engineer 101-7006-60144 17,360.00 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 207783 04/18/22 - SHOPPING BAGS (2000) FOR Cl... Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 7,878.94 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 207783 04/18/22 - DRINKING BOTTLES (500) FOR ... Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 1,986.12 REGALADO ARAUJO, LUIS 207787 05/03/22 - ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS L... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 TRIPLETT, ALCADIA 207800 05/03/22 - ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS C.., Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 SEVILLA, RAMSES 207791 05/04/22 -ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ... 207757 04/29-05/28/22 - FS #32 INTERNET (6491) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 DATA TICKET, INC. 207760 03/2022 -CODE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Services 101-6004-60111 842.00 DATA TICKET, INC. 207760 03/2022 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Services 101-6004-60111 614.54 POWERS AWARDS INC 207784 04/26/22 - NAME PLATE J.DELGADO Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 30.16 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 207774 03/2022 - ONCALL PLAN CHECK SVCS ENG... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 189.00 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 207799 04/23-05/22/22 - EOC PHONE LINE SVC Telephone - Utilities 101-2002-61300 1,944.80 CORTEZ, ELISABETH 2O7759 05/06/22 - YOGA CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 75.60 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 207808 05/06/22 - GENTLE YOGA CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 9.10 ANDERSON COMMUNICATION... 207752 05/01/22 - ANNUAL REPEATER SVC FOR E... Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 648.00 PREMIER MEDIA GROUP 207785 05/2022 - PRINT ADS Marketing &TourismPromoti... 101-3007-60461 1,500.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUC... 207762 04/29/22 - FB PARK GATE REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 4,650.00 ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS ... 207767 04/21/22 - X-PARK DUST CONTROL PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 1,070.00 NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 207779 04/2022 - SATELLITE PHONES Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 80.71 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207805 04/30/22 - FRUITLESS OLIVE TREE Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 370.00 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 207781 04/22/22 - CITY WIDE COPY PAPER Forms, Copier Paper 101-1007-60402 227.77 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 207751 04/2022 - RADIO ADS 93.7 KCLB Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 1,539.49 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 207751 04/2022 - RADIO ADS MIX 100.05 Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 1,539.49 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 207761 03/2022 - BLOOD/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS (DO.. Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 105.00 ROBERT HALF 207788 04/01/22 -TEMP AGENCY SERVICES G.HU Temporary Agency Services 101-6002-60125 1,355.40 ROBERT HALF 207788 04/08/22 -TEMP AGENCY SERVICES G.HU Temporary Agency Services 101-6002-60125 1,355.40 ROBERT HALF 207788 04/22/22 -TEMP AGENCY SERVICES G.HU Temporary Agency Services 101-6002-60125 1,355.40 ROBERT HALF 207788 04/22/22 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES T.SU... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 847.08 ROBERT HALF 207788 04/29/22 -TEMP AGENCY SERVICES G.HU Temporary Agency Services 101-6002-60125 1,355.40 MARLIN CONTROLS, INC. 207778 04/29/22 - MAG-LIGHT EMITTER Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -53.81 MARLIN CONTROLS, INC. 207778 04/29/22 - MAG-LIGHT EMITTER Small Tools & Equipment 101-2002-60545 695.81 SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE FIR 207793 05/14/22 - SNIP CLINIC Veterinary Service 101-6004-60194 1,500.00 SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE FIR 207793 05/14/22 - SNIP CLINIC Veterinary Service 101-6004-60194 1,500.00 SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE FIR 207793 05/14/22 - SNIP CLINIC Veterinary Service 101-6004-60194 500.00 VINTAGE E & S INC 207806 04/06/22 - RECEPTACLE INSTALL AT SRR P... Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 744.14 VINTAGE E & S INC 207806 05/03/22 - CIVIC PARK LIGHTING SERVICE ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 906.40 VINTAGE E & S INC 207806 4/30/22 -TEMPORARY POWER SETUP FOR.. Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 330.16 VINTAGE E & S INC 207806 05/03/22 - CIVIC PARK LIGHTING SERVICE ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 5,599.30 VINTAGE E & S INC 207806 4/20/22-FS#32 FLUORESCENT LIGHTS CO... Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 742.86 THE GAS COMPANY 207796 03/31-04/29/22 - FS #93 GAS SVC Gas - Utilities 101-2002-61100 97.03 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 4/30/22 -TENT AND CHAIRS RENTAL FOR ... Community Engagement 101-3007-60137 4,000.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/18/22 - CLOROX WIPES & DETERGENT Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 55.43 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/18/22 - WATER BOTTLES 10 CASES Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 129.90 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/13/22 - WATER BOTTLES FOR PICNIC Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 129.90 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/13/22 - COOKIES FOR PICNIC Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 404.55 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/05/22 - ICE CHESTS (2) Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 184.85 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/04/22 - INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH EM... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 49.71 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/29/22 - INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH ADM.. Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 97.69 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/12/22 - UPS PACKAGE SHIPPING Postage 101-1007-60470 161.39 /3I/ dII PrI q, d a 8 175 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03133 - 05/13/2022 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/12/22 - MATRIX WORKSHOP LUNCH LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 82.95 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/04/22 - GASB 2022 UPDATE C.MARTIN... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 95.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/11/22 - COFFEE CUPS (100) Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 27.72 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/28/22 - SUPPLIES FOR FIRE SAFETY SPE... Office Supplies 101-2002-60400 16.15 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/28/22 - SUPPLIES FOR FIRE SAFETY SPE... Small Tools & Equipment 101-2002-60545 131.49 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/12/22 - BBQ COVER & PAPER SHREDD... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 278.98 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 - ATV ITEMS & PHONE HOLDER Fire Station 101-2002-60670 163.90 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 - ATV TIRE Fire Station 101-2002-60670 234.90 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 - ATV DRIVE BELT Fire Station 101-2002-60670 184.82 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 - ATV SEAT STORAGE BOX Fire Station 101-2002-60670 167.46 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/11/22 -TREAT BAGS FOR CITY PICNIC Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 59.75 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/28/22 - EASTER EVENT SUPPLIES Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 179.25 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/2022 - MAILCHIMP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 130.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/24/22 - FB BOOSTED ADS Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 400.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/2022 - MUSIC & STORAGE BUNDLE Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 19.95 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/31/22 - FB BOOSTED ADS Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 398.15 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/14/22 - APPLE MUSIC CREDIT Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 -0.29 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/26/22 - CLOCKS FOR CH Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 282.72 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 - DESK LAMP Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 76.11 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 - SAFETY VESTS (3) Safety Gear 101-7006-60427 87.45 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/07/22 - D&D DEPT MANAGER LUNCH ... Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 99.29 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/26/22 - PLANNING COMMISSION MEET.. Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 175.90 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/12/22 - PLANNING COMMISSION MEET.. Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 82.64 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/12/22 - PLANNING COMMISSION MEET.. Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 83.20 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/12/22 - CPSI TRAINING BOOKS Travel & Training 101-3005-60320 130.01 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/04/22 - WATER BOTTLES FOR SRR BUS... Community Special Events 101-1001-60137 97.52 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/14/22 - ACRYLIC TOPPERS FOR CITY PI... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -10.48 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 - 2022 CV BUSINESS CONFEREN... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 50.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/04/22 - CPFO CANDIDATE PROGRAM K... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 600.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/04/22 - GFOA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL... Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 150.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/19/22 - 2021 eGAAFR BOOK Subscriptions & Publications 101-1006-60352 96.75 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/01/22 - PAPER TWIST TIES Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 16.86 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/08/22 - ROTARY HAND WASH STATION... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 60.75 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/05/22 - EASTER BASKETS CREDIT MEMO Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 -236.19 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/06/22 - HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMITS Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 203.72 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/01/22 - MARKERS (4) Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 17.04 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/14/22 - ACRYLIC TOPPERS FOR CITY PI... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 153.87 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/05/22 - COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 141.38 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/26/22 -TRAVEL EXPENSE Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 55.63 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING ... 207768 05/02/22 - WC HVAC DIAGNOSTIC ANALYS.. HVAC 101-3008-60667 79.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 207775 05/10/22 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Colonel Paige - Utiliti... 101-3005-61108 612.05 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 207775 05/10/22 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Adams Park - Utilities 101-3005-61110 34.71 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207758 05/10/22 - WATER SERVICE Water -Pioneer Park - Utilities 101-3005-61207 555.19 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING ... 207768 05/04/22 - FS #93 HVAC DIAGNOSTIC ANA... Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 79.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925962 - REIMBURSEMENT MATTERS Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 2,950.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925962 - REIMBURSEMENT MATTERS Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 11,050.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925949 - SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE MATT... Attorney 101-1003-60153 2,707.09 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925955 - DUNE PALMS PROJECT ROW Attorney 101-1003-60153 263.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925960 - COVID-19 ADVICE Attorney 101-1003-60153 120.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925948 - RETAINER MATTER Attorney 101-1003-60153 11,000.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925945 - CODE ENFORCEMENT Attorney 101-1003-60153 65.59 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925943 - PERSONNEL GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 216.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925958 - RESPONSES FOR PUBLIC RECORD... Attorney 101-1003-60153 888.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925942 - GENERAL ACCOUNT Attorney 101-1003-60153 3,276.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925963 - LQ ARTS FESTIVAL CANCELLATION Attorney 101-1003-60153 312.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925971 - STVR PHASE OUT CITIZENS BALL... Attorney 101-1003-60153 1,440.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925964 - LQ ARTS FESTIVAL TRADEMARK Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 264.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925944 - LITIGATION GENERAL Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 1,521.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 207803 09/01/21-06/30/22 - SRR PARK PEST CON... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 712.50 TRULY NOLEN INC 207803 08/01/21-06/30/22 - LQ PARK RODENT PE... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 380.00 I Pig( ? 7 176 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03133 - 05/13/2022 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount TRULY NOLEN INC 207803 08/01/21-06/30/2022 - FS #32 RODENT P... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 641.25 TRULY NOLEN INC 207803 08/01/21-06/30/22 - FS #93 RODENT PEST... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 641.25 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207782 04/1/22, 04/13/22, 04/19/22 - CH HVAC R... HVAC 101-3008-60667 4,688.70 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 207780 04/21/22 - SERVICE CALL FOR FB POOL W... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 156.25 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 207780 05/03/22 - LQ PARK SPLASH PAD CHLORI... LQ Park Water Feature 101-3005-60554 270.79 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207805 03/23/22 - PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 304.66 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 207763 05/04/22 - RAB LIGHTS FOR FB PARK Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 4,094.50 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & AS... 207773 10/2021-12/2021 TRANSACTION TAX Consultants 101-1006-60104 300.00 HDL COREN & CONE 207771 04/01-06/30/22 - PROPERTY TAX MANAG... Consultants 101-1006-60104 4,909.25 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 130,213.58 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND LINDE GAS & EQUIPMENT INC. 207777 03/20-04/20/22 - CYLINDER RENTAL Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 39.79 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207797 04/25/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 775.66 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207797 04/25/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 191.84 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207797 04/25/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 64.49 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207797 04/27/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 192.29 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207797 04/30/22 - BARRICADES Barricades 201-7003-60428 400.00 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207797 05/05/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 896.75 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/26/22 - FACE MASKS Safety Gear 201-7003-60427 84.78 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 2,645.60 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/31/22 - CUSTOME GOBO FOR LQ MUS... Operating Supplies 202-3006-60420 88.76 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/13/22 - 12 BOOKS FOR GOOD READ P... Operating Supplies 202-3006-60420 208.20 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/13/22 - 24 BOOKS FOR GOOD READS P... Operating Supplies 202-3006-60420 411.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 - 12 BOOKS FOR GOOD READ P... Operating Supplies 202-3006-60420 189.24 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 897.20 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207801 04/28/22 - LANDSCAPE RUBBLE Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 1,353.56 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207801 04/29/22 - LANDSCAPE RUBBLE Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 360.95 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207801 04/27/22 - LANDSCAPE DG Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 804.59 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUC... 207762 04/29/22 -TOPAZ RETENTION BASIN FEN... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 4,700.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207805 04/26/22 - WESCERAMICS POTTERY Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 4,025.54 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 207792 04/26/22 - IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 66.58 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 207772 04/25/22 - IRRIGATION PARTS FOR FS #32 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 92.33 VINTAGE E & S INC 207806 4/6-4/8/22 - AVE 54 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING.. Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 4,748.08 VINTAGE E & S INC 207806 05/03/22 - AVE 54 MEDIAN LIGHTING UP... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 6,534.72 PWLC II, INC 207786 05/02/22 - FS #93 DG INSTALLATION Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 608.00 PWLC II, INC 207786 05/05/22 - AVE 50 TREE REMOVAL SERVICE Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 875.00 PWLC II, INC 207786 5/3-5/6/2022 - AVE 54 LANDSCAPE ROCK ... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 2,432.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/30/22 - SUNSCREEN (15) Safety Gear 215-7004-60427 158.70 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/26/22 - POTTERY Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 1,234.31 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 207775 05/10/22 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 903.70 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 207775 05/10/22 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 244.85 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207758 05/10/22 - WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 186.46 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207805 04/06/22 - OLEA EUROPAEA WILSONII TR... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 3,717.38 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207805 04/26/22 - AGAVE PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 314.09 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 33,360.84 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 -TRASH BAGS AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 21.25 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/31/22 - GARBAGE TRUCK TOYS FOR Cl... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 46.70 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/31/22 - GARDEN HAND TOOLS & COM... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 128.56 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/31/22 - RECYCLE ACTIVITY BOOKS FOR ... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 17.39 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22 -TRASH CAN AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 88.85 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 03/25/22 - SILICONE STRAWS FOR EARTH ... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 823.14 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/05/22 - PLANTERS FOR BENJAMIN FRA... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 2,697.55 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/22/22 - RECOGNITION AWARD BENJA... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 73.41 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/05/22 - PLANTERS FOR BENJAMIN FRA... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 2,639.45 Fund 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total: 6,536.30 177 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03133 - 05/13/2022 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY RUTAN & TUCKER 207789 925947 - HOUSING AUTHORITY MISC Attorney 241-9101-60153 3,120.00 Fund 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 3,120.00 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND SWAN, BRUCE 207794 05/06/22 - PANEL FOR VETERANS MONU... APP Maintenance 270-0000-60683 1,490.00 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total: 1,490.00 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207776 3/25/22 - PEDESTRIAN BUTTON FRAMEW... Construction 401-0000-60188 72.50 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207776 03/25/22 - PEDESTRIAN BUTTON FRAME... Construction 401-0000-60188 80.50 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207776 03/25/22 - PEDESTRIAN BUTTON FRAME... Construction 401-0000-60188 920.00 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207776 05/05/22 - PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS (... Construction 401-0000-60188 3,680.00 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207776 05/05/22 - PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS (... Construction 401-0000-60188 322.00 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207776 05/05/22 - PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS (... Construction 401-0000-60188 72.50 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/26/22 - DUNE PALMS MOBILE UNIT 59 ... Land Acquisition 401-0000-74010 141.00 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 5,288.50 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT SWEEPER SHOP 207795 06/16/21 - PARTS FOR SWEEPER Street Sweeper 501-0000-60678 331.79 DURABLE COATING, INC. 207765 04/12/22 - 2022 CHEVY TRUCK LINERS (5) Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 4,040.63 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIVE... 207756 04/19/22 - MOTORCYCLE TIRE SERVICE Al... Motorcycle Repair & Mainten... 501-0000-60679 573.68 TOWER ENERGY GROUP 207798 04/16-04/30/22 - FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 4,902.07 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/08/22 - VEHICLE STEP BARS (6) Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 1,663.80 S&D CARWASH MANAGEMENT.. 207790 04/2022 -CAR WASH MEMBERSHIP Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 501-0000-60676 819.59 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 207766 05/2022 - FLEET LEASE Vehicles, Rentals & Leases 501-0000-71030 14,899.05 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 27,230.61 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TPX COMMUNICATIONS 207799 04/23-05/22/22 - PHONE LINE SVC Telephone - Utilities 502-0000-61300 3,622.35 TRITON TECHNOLOGY SOLUTI... 207802 04/29/22 - CHAMBER AV EQUIP UPGRADES Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 11,151.30 ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 207750 05/2022 - TRAFFIC SERVER MAINTENANCE Public Works, Software Enhan... 502-0000-71048 765.00 ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 207750 05/2022 - IT SERVICES Consultants 502-0000-60104 25,625.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/2022 -ADOBE HOMEBASE J.DELGADO Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 14.99 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/21/22-04/20/23 - FILE SHARING SUBSC... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 594.00 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/26/22 - IPHONE CHARGING SUPPLIES (... Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 244.44 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/26/22 - IPHONE CASES (5) Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 154.70 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/11/22 - IPAD CASE FOR B.RODRIGUEZ Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 23.91 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/28/22 - HULU SUBSCRIPTION Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 69.99 BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/27-05/27/22 - UBIQ SUBSCRIPTION D & D, Software Enhancements 502-0000-71042 60.48 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 42,326.16 Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND BANK OF THE WEST 207753 04/11/22 - ERGONOMIC KEYBOARD Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 32.61 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 32.61 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT GARDAWORLD 207770 05/2022 SRR ARMORED SERVICES Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 781.32 Fund 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 781.32 Grand Total: 253,922.72 178 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03133 - 05/13/2022 JB Fund Summary Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND 201 - GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 270-ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 504- INSURANCE FUND 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-20304 101-0000-20981 101-0000-20985 101-0000-22810 101-1001-60137 101-1001-60320 101-1003-60153 101-1003-60154 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60129 101-1005-60320 101-1006-60104 101-1006-60320 101-1006-60351 101-1006-60352 101-1007-60402 101-1007-60403 101-1007-60470 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60174 101-2002-60116 101-2002-60400 101-2002-60545 101-2002-60670 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61100 101-2002-61300 101-2002-61304 101-2002-61400 101-3002-60107 101-3002-60420 101-3003-60149 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60320 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60554 101-3005-60691 101-3005-61108 101-3005-61110 101-3005-61207 101-3007-60137 101-3007-60351 101-3007-60461 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Sales Taxes Payable United Way Deductions Garnishments Payable Developer Deposits Community Special Events Travel & Training Attorney Attorney/Litigation Annual Wellness Dollar Re... Recruiting/Pre-Em ployme... Travel & Training Consultants Travel & Training Membership Dues Subscriptions & Publicati... Forms, Copier Paper Citywide Supplies Postage LQ Police Volunteers Blood/Alcohol Testing Pest Control Office Supplies Small Tools & Equipment Fire Station Maintenance/Services Gas - Utilities Telephone - Utilities Mobile/Cell Phones/Satell... Cable/Internet - Utilities Instructors Operating Supplies Community Experiences Fritz Burns Pool Maintena... Travel & Training Materials/Supplies LQ Park Water Feature Maintenance/Services Electric - Colonel Paige - U... Electric - Adams Park - Util.. Water -Pioneer Park - Utili... Community Engagement Membership Dues Marketing & Tourism Pro... Expense Amount 130,213.58 2,645.60 897.20 33,360.84 6,536.30 3,120.00 1,490.00 5,288.50 27,230.61 42,326.16 32.61 781.32 253,922.72 Expense Amount -64.29 37.00 221.25 14,000.00 97.52 141.38 20,287.68 1,785.00 600.00 147.40 55.63 5,209.25 745.00 150.00 96.75 227.77 27.72 161.39 82.95 105.00 1,282.50 16.15 827.30 1,030.06 821.86 97.03 1,944.80 728.71 99.99 84.70 55.43 1,634.41 156.25 130.01 4,769.16 270.79 11,155.70 612.05 34.71 555.19 4,000.00 130.00 15,261.85 /31/ 022 Q i"04 Prig( "6 o 179 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03133 - 05/13/2022 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3008-60116 Pest Control 1,092.50 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 282.72 101-3008-60667 HVAC 4,767.70 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 744.14 101-6001-60420 Operating Supplies 441.03 101-6002-60125 Temporary Agency Servic... 5,421.60 101-6002-60450 Advertising 441.00 101-6004-60111 Administrative Citation Se... 1,456.54 101-6004-60194 Veterinary Service 3,500.00 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 30.16 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servic... 847.08 101-6006-60420 Operating Supplies 76.11 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 2,782.50 101-7006-60144 Contract Traffic Engineer 17,360.00 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 1,070.00 101-7006-60427 Safety Gear 87.45 201-7003-60427 Safety Gear 84.78 201-7003-60428 Barricades 400.00 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 2,121.03 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 39.79 202-3006-60420 Operating Supplies 897.20 215-7004-60427 Safety Gear 158.70 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 11,969.33 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 19,897.80 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 903.70 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utiliti... 244.85 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utilities 186.46 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutions 6,536.30 241-9101-60153 Attorney 3,120.00 270-0000-60683 APP Maintenance 1,490.00 401-0000-60188 Construction 5,147.50 401-0000-74010 Land Acquisition 141.00 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 4,902.07 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and Up... 5,704.43 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Mainte... 819.59 501-0000-60678 Street Sweeper 331.79 501-0000-60679 Motorcycle Repair & Main.. 573.68 501-0000-71030 Vehicles, Rentals & Leases 14,899.05 502-0000-60104 Consultants 25,625.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 608.99 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 423.05 502-0000-61300 Telephone - Utilities 3,622.35 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 69.99 502-0000-71042 D & D, Software Enhance... 60.48 502-0000-71048 Public Works, Software E... 765.00 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 11,151.30 504-1010-60420 Operating Supplies 32.61 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 781.32 Grand Total: 253,922.72 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 195,271.81 201804E Landscape & Lighting Median Island ... Landscape & Lighting Median Islan 18,040.18 202119E SilverRock and X-Park Dust Control E... SilverRock and X-Park Dust Control 1,070.00 21-003E THE WAVE EXP CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT 2,950.00 2122TMICT Construction Expense FY21/22 Traffic Maintenance Impri 5,147.50 22006E GTGF LLC EXPENSE GTGF, LLC 11,050.00 180 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03133 - 05/13/2022 JB Project Account Key BDAYE CORONANR CSA152E EGGE KITEE VETSE Project Account Summary Project Account Name City Picnic & Birthday Celebration Ex... Corona Non Reimbursable CSA 152 Expenses La Quinta Egg Hunt Expense Fly Over La Quinta Expense Veterans Day Ceremony Expense Grand Total: Project Name City Picnic & Birthday Celebration Corona Virus Emergency Response CSA 152 Project Tracking La Quinta Egg Hunt Fly Over LQ: A Kite Experience Veterans Day Ceremony 253,922.72 Expense Amount 18,389.70 204.78 331.79 -40.08 17.04 1,490.00 181 City of La Quinta Demand Register Packet: APPKT03136 - 05/20/22 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND WILLDAN 207875 02/2022 - ONCALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ... Contract Traffic Engineer 101-7006-60144 9,380.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ... 207819 05/05-06/04/22 - FS #32 CABLE (1841) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 10.51 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 207852 05/09/22 - POLOS FOR CITY PICNIC Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 2,850.31 TELLEZ, BENJAMIN 207862 05/11/22 -ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS 207874 Q3 FY 21/22 STVR TBID COLLECTIONS TBID Due to VGPS 101-0000-20303 192,758.00 VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS 207874 Q3 FY 21/22 STVR TBID COLLECTIONS VGPS TBID Admin Fee 101-0000-43635 -9,637.90 VILLANUEVA, CELESTE 207872 5/16/22-ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS RE... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 25.00 BATUTA, DANIELE 207816 05/16/22 - ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ... 207819 05/03-06/02/22 - FS #93 INTERNET (3514) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 DESERT TREE SPRAYING 207830 05/16/22 - FIREANT TREATMENT AT SRR ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 300.00 GARDAWORLD 207839 05/2022 ARMORED SVC Professional Services 101-1006-60103 305.53 ARCHULETA CONCRETE CONST... 207814 05/09/22 - AVENUE 47 SIDEWALK IMPRO... Professional Services 101-7003-60103 42,175.75 DOOR TECH, LLC 207831 04/2S/22 - WC MULTI PURPOSE RM DOOR.. Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 420.00 DOOR TECH, LLC 207831 04/28/22 - WC ENTERANCE DOOR REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 385.00 BLOWNAWAY BY WILLIAM 207817 05/10/22 - WATER FEATURE SENSOR HOU... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 255.00 SKILL PATH SEMINARS 207858 04/08/22 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT WOR... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 159.00 EISENHOWER OCCUPATIONAL... 207832 04/2022 - DOT EXAM Consultants/Employee Services 101-1004-60104 165.00 EISENHOWER OCCUPATIONAL... 207832 04/2022 - PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 570.00 SPARKLETTS 207860 04/20/22 & 05/04/22 - DRINKING WATER Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 160.55 SPARKLETTS 207860 3/23/22, 4/2022 ,5/4/22 - CITYWIDE DRIN... Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 396.91 FIRE ETC 207835 05/13/22 -THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA ... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 8,218.44 CORTEZ, ELISABETH 2O7823 05/16/22 - YOGA INDOOR CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 70.00 HEWETT, ATSUKO YAMANE 207840 05/16/22 -TAI CHI YANG CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 264.60 CORTEZ, ELISABETH 2O7823 05/16/22 - YOGA DI CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 193.20 CSMFO 207825 05/2022 - INTRO TO GOV ACCOUNTING D... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 75.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Consultants 101-7006-60104 112.50 GARDAWORLD 207839 04/2022 - ARMORED SVC EXCESS PREMISE.. Professional Services 101-1006-60103 41.75 ACE CARPET CLEANING 207809 05/04/22 - CH CARPET CLEANING Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 275.00 ACE CARPET CLEANING 207809 05/04/22 - FS #93 CARPET CLEANING Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 350.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUC... 207826 05/04/22 - BEAR CREEK TRAIL FENCE REPA... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 4,100.00 ANSAFONE CONTACT CENTERS 207813 04/11-05/8/22 - PM 10 ANSWERING SERV... PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 126.76 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207873 3/30-4/01/22 - BEAR CREEK TRAIL IRRIGAT.., Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,840.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207873 03/28-03/29/22 - BEAR CREEK TRAIL CLEA... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 2,560.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207873 05/11/22 - SUMMER FLOWERS FOR CH Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 630.00 SKILL PATH SEMINARS 207858 03/17/22 - GUIDE TO PROJECT MANAGE... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 34.08 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 207850 04/28/22 - BUDGET BINDERS Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 16.51 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 207850 04/28/22 - CITYWIDE COPY PAPER Forms, Copier Paper 101-1007-60402 56.94 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 207850 04/26/22 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 250.03 DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT 207828 04/2022 - FB POOL OPERATIONS & FROG... Fritz Burns Pool Programming 101-3003-60184 4,659.97 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 207861 04/21/22 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 133.07 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY M... 207859 07/2021-06/2022 - SENIOR CENTER HOT 5... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 143.88 ROBERT HALF 207856 04/01/22 -TEMP AGENCY SVCS J.AGGREH Temporary Agency Services 101-6004-60125 996.81 ROBERT HALF 207856 04/29/22 -TEMP AGENCY SVCS J.AGGREH Temporary Agency Services 101-6004-60125 1,351.60 ROBERT HALF 207856 04/29/22 -TEMP AGENCY SVCS T.SUDAKO... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 830.79 ROBERT HALF 207856 05/06/22 -TEMP AGENCY SVCS T.SUDAKO... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 814.50 ROBERT HALF 207856 05/06/22 -TEMP AGENCY SVCS J.AGGREH Temporary Agency Services 101-6004-60125 1,081.28 COURTMASTER SPORTS, INC. 207824 05/12/22 - SWING GATE INSTALL Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 850.00 FLAGS A FLYING 207836 04/29/22 - USA FLAGS (9) & CA FLAGS (6) Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 1,140.00 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT... 207846 03/2022 - JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 101-3008-60115 12,742.87 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT... 207846 04/2022 - JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 101-3008-60115 12,742.87 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT... 207846 04/22/22 - CH COVID 19 CLEANING Janitorial 101-3008-60115 730.00 AMERICANFORENSIC NURSES ... 207810 05/13/22 - BLOOD/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 61.22 FEDEX 207833 04/27/22 - OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 37.82 182 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03136 - 05/20/22 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount TOP OF THE LINE SIGNS 207866 05/16/22 - LQ PARK FITNESS COURT WALL... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 910.00 JNS MEDIA SPECIALISTS 207842 04/2022 INVOICES & 05/2022 RETAINER Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 6,297.18 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 04/2022 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20947 448.20 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 04/2022 ADD'L LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM Add'I Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20948 559.46 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 04/2022 STD/LTD INSURANCE PREMIUM Disability Insurance Pay 101-0000-20955 3,104.68 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/19/22 - CEILING LIGHT FOR FS #32 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 144.63 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/13/22 - CLOCK FOR FB POOL Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 75.41 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/22/22 - PAINT FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL Supplies -Graffiti and Vandalism 101-3005-60423 25.74 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/11/22 - WATER HOSE FOR PARKS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 69.88 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 02/25/22 - PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 98.92 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/13/22 -TRASH CAN Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 34.08 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/11/22 - RATCHET TIE DOWNS & MATER.. Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 29.91 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/06/22 - STEEL CHAIN & PLYWOOD FOR... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 241.37 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/15/22 - MASONRY DRILL BIT & WEDGE... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 51.10 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/22/22 - SUPPLIES FOR PARK BENCH IN... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 40.66 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/21/22 - RUBBER PLUNGER FOR FOUNT... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 13.42 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/16/22 - SUPPLIES FOR PARK BENCH IN... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 76.91 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/16/22 - SMALL TOOLS FOR PARK BENC... Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 189.98 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 3/14/22- WHOLE HOUSE REPLACEMNT FIL... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 42.30 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/30/22 - STEEL ROLLED FENCING FOR CH Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 42.33 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/13/22 - RATCHET TIE DOWNS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 36.15 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 02/25/22 - 5 GALLON BUCKETS (2) Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 10.29 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/14/22 - CONCRETE ANCHORS & ADHES... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 68.09 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/31/22 - AIR FILTER FOR SRR EVENT PA... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 15.40 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 02/25/22 - SHARPIE & DUCT TAPE FOR AL... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 19.15 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/08/22 - ENERGIZER BATTERIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 7.21 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/08/22 - 3 TON GARAGE JACK Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 170.47 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 04/14/22 - BATTERIES FOR POWER TOOLS Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 249.16 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/10/22 - WHEELBARROW & TOOLS Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 471.04 YOCKEY, JENNIFER LYNNE 207877 04/2022 - STRECTCH & MEDITATION EMP... Consultants/Employee Services 101-1004-60104 450.00 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 737.43 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE Water -Monticello Park - Utiliti... 101-3005-61201 1,259.97 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE Water -Fritz Burns Park - Utiliti... 101-3005-61204 154.24 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE Water -Seasons Park - Utilities 101-3005-61208 28.22 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE Water -Community Park - Utilit.. 101-3005-61209 193.61 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 96.40 DESERT RESORT MANAGEMENT 207829 05/2022 - SECURITY PATROL SERVICE Professional Services 101-6004-60103 3,648.15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD C... 207855 FY 21/22 WHITEWATER NPDES COST SHAR.. Professional Services 101-7002-60103 35,681.60 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 02/2022 STD/LTD INSURANCE PREMIUM Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20947 3,121.57 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 02/2022 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20947 464.40 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 02/2022 ADD'L LIFE INSURANCE PREMILI Add'I Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20948 570.46 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207851 04/01/22 - CH HVAC RETURN FAN MOTOR... HVAC 101-3008-60667 1,521.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207851 2/18/22, 3/16/22, 3/17/22 - CH CHILLER ... HVAC 101-3008-60667 2,028.00 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 01/2022 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20947 469.80 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 01/2022 ADD'L LIFE INSURANCE PREMIU... Add'I Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20948 559.46 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 01/2022 STD/LTD INSURANCE PREMIUM Disability Insurance Pay 101-0000-20955 3,145.79 RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR 207854 03/2022 - RECORDING FEES Due to County Recorder 101-0000-20325 470.00 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 03/2022 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20947 459.00 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 03/2022 ADD'L LIFE INSURANCE PREMIU... Add'I Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20948 559.46 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 03/2022 STD/LTD INSURANCE PREMIUMS Disability Insurance Pay 101-0000-20955 3,119.02 RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR 207854 03/2022 - RECORDING FEES Technical 101-6004-60108 20.00 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 05/2022 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20947 442.80 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 05/2022 ADD'L LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM Add'I Life Insurance Pay 101-0000-20948 525.78 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE I... 207864 05/2022 STD/LTD INSURANCE PREMIUM Disability Insurance Pay 101-0000-20955 4,464.59 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS... 207837 05/2022 - LQ PARK PHONE Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 47.34 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 207849 02/2022 - FB POOL DECK CLEANING Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 600.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 207849 05/2022 - FB POOL CAT 5000 COMPUTER... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 240.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 207849 05/2022 - FB POOL MONTHLY MAINTENA... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 5,103.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 207849 04/2022 - FB POOL DECK CLEANING Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 1,000.00 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE Water -Desert Pride - Utilities 101-3005-61206 215.89 I Pig( ? 7 183 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 207834 01/31/2022 - SERVICE CHARGE Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207867 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT... 207846 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT... 207846 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT... 207846 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINT... 207846 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207851 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207851 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207851 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207869 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207869 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207869 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207869 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207869 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207869 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207873 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 207861 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 207841 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 207841 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI... 207820 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 207827 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 207852 Fund: 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 207876 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS G.L. GAYLER CONSTRUCTION_. 207838 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207843 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 207822 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 207822 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 05/13/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS 04/22/22 - NUTS & BOLTS (250) 03/2022 - JANITORIAL SERVICES 03/2022 - JANITORIAL SERVICES 04/2022 - JANITORIAL SERVICES 04/2022 - JANITORIAL SERVICES 04/13/22 - INDOOR SECURITY CAMERA F... 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE 03/7-03/16/22- LIBRARY CHILLER MAINTE... 04/20/22 - MUSEUM HVAC REPAIRS 03/18/22 - LIBRARY HVAC REPAIR 05/03/22 - LANDSCAPE ROCK 05/04/22 - LANDSCAPE ROCK 05/03/22 - LANDSCAPE DG 05/05/22 - LANDSCAPE ROCK 05/03/22 - LANDSCAPE DG 05/05/22 - LANDSCAPE ROCK 5/11/22 - IRRIGATION BATTERY CONTROL.. 05/11/22 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/21/22 - CONCRETE PAINT 03/22/22 -TEE FITTINGS 04/14/22 - CLEANING GLOVES (4) 03/14/22 - WASHERS & BOLTS 04/18/22 - PUSH BROOM & JUG CHILLER 05/17/22 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE 05/17/22 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE 05/17/22 - WATER SERVICE 05/04/22 - ELECTRICITY BREAKER Packet: APPKT03136 - 05/20/22 JB Account Name Account Number Amount PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total Janitorial 202-3004-60115 Janitorial 202-3006-60115 Janitorial 202-3004-60115 Janitorial 202-3006-60115 Maintenance/Services 202-3006-60691 Water -Utilities 202-3006-61200 HVAC 202-3004-60667 HVAC 202-3006-60667 HVAC 202-3004-60667 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Operating Supplies 215-7004-60420 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 05/09/22 - RECYCLING SHIRTS FOR CITY PI... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 Fund 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total 40.80 6.99 385,698.03 2,710.66 727.08 2,792.12 727.08 123.95 181.04 3,380.00 829.99 2,420.89 13,892.81 2,849.60 2,846.71 744.92 1,423.64 770.58 1,420.17 925.00 381.68 51.39 7.92 55.68 12.67 100.62 629.26 38.33 4,249.80 61.91 16,569.88 5,470.51 5,470.51 FY 20/21 CONTINUING BOND DISCLOSURE... Consultants 237-9001-60104 2,300.00 Fund 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN Total: 2,300.00 5/12/22 - X PARK ADDITIONAL PARKING D... Construction 401-0000-60188 4,807.45 04/14/22 - REPLACEMENT SIGN PANEL "C... Construction 401-0000-60188 405.56 05/10/22 - FREIGHT Construction 401-0000-60188 435.00 136 — 433-1270-003XL — 12" Red Ball LED... Construction 401-0000-60188 3,556.40 12 — 432-1374-901XOD — 12" Red Arrow L... Construction 401-0000-60188 337.80 144-432-2374-001XOD-12"Green Arr... Construction 401-0000-60188 4,053.60 05/10/22 - SALES TAXES Construction 401-0000-60188 1,567.49 32 — 430-6479-001X — Countdown LED ITE Construction 401-0000-60188 3,392.00 136-433-2270-001XL-12"Green Ball LE... Construction 401-0000-60188 3,624.40 100 — 433-3270-901XL— 12" Yellow Ball L... Construction 401-0000-60188 2,950.00 1/1-3/3/22-MATERIAL TESTING WASHING... Technical 401-0000-60108 13,018.00 1/1-2/18/22-MATERIAL TESTING RETENTI... Technical 401-0000-60108 12,770.50 04/2022 LQ LANDSCAPE RENOVATION I ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 8,105.00 04/2022 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER Professional Services 401-0000-60103 2,325.00 184 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Packet: APPKT03136 - 05/20/22 JB Account Name Account Number Amount NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 JEFFERSON STREET SLURRY SEAL ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 VILLAGE ART/CULTURAL PLAZA Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 JEFFERSON STREET AT AVENUE 5... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 FRITZ BURNS PARK IMPROVEME... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 AVE 48 ART & MUSIC LINE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 CITYWIDE STRIPPING REFRESH Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 SRR RETENTION BASIN SOIL STAB... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 CITYWIDE MISC ADA IMPROVEM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 LA QUINTA X PARK Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 WASHINGTON STREET AT FRED ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 207848 04/2022 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE IMPROVE... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 URBAN HABITAT 207870 04/2022 SRR RETENTION BASIN IRRIGATI... Construction 401-0000-60188 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 207853 04/14/22 -TIRES FOR TRUCK #10 Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 501-0000-60676 SC FUELS 207857 02/28/22 - FS #70 GENERATOR FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 AMERICAN TIRE DEPOT 207811 04/18/22 - BRAKE SERVICE FOR TRUCK #12 Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 501-0000-60676 MNRO HOLDINGS, LLC. 207847 05/10/22 -TIRES FOR 2018 CHEVY 2500 HD Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 501-0000-60676 AUTOZONE 207815 02/02/22 - VEHICLE BATTERY Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 AUTOZONE 207815 02/02/22 - BATTERY RETURN Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 AUTOZONE 207815 02/15/22 - VEHICLE JACKS (2) Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 AUTOZONE 207815 02/24/22 - CAR WASH SOAP Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 AUTOZONE 207815 03/22/22 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 TOWER ENERGY GROUP 207868 03/01-03/15/22 - FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 THE GAS COMPANY 207863 04/01-05/01/22 - SWEEPER FUEL Street Sweeper 501-0000-60678 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/01/22 - DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/25/22 -TRAILER JACK REPAIR Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 THE LOCK SHOP, INC 207865 05/04/22 - KEY BRASS TAGS (100) Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 501-0000-60676 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ... 207819 05/2022 - CH CABLE (4625) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ... 207819 05/10-06/09/22 - CH INTERNET (2546) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ... 207819 05/12-06/11/22 - CITY YARD CABLE (4080) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 ANDERSON COMMUNICATION... 207812 05/01/22 - PW RADIOS ANNUAL REPEATER.. Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES_. 207818 05/2022 CITY PRINTERS & 04/2022 METER... Copiers 502-0000-60662 COMPLETE PAPERLESS SOLUTI... 207821 7/1/22-6/5/23 LASERFICHE MAINT&SUPP... Prepaid Expense 502-0000-13600 COMPLETE PAPERLESS SOLUTI... 207821 6/6/22-6/30/22 LASERFICHE ANNUAL MA... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 VERIZON WIRELESS 207871 04/02-05/01/22 - BACKUP SERVER (2183) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 VERIZON WIRELESS 207871 04/02-05/01/22 - CITY (PADS (5587) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 VERIZON WIRELESS 207871 04/02-05/01/22 - CITY CELL SVC (5496) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS... 207837 05/03-06/02/22 - 2ND CITY INTERNET LINE Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS... 207837 05/04-06/03/22 - DSL SVC Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 207834 12/27/21 - WATER HEATER TEMP CONTIR Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 207834 12/27/21 - GAS THERMOSTAT FOR SRR Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 207834 02/23/2022 - SOAP DISPENSER FOR SRR Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 GARDAWORLD 207839 04/2022 - SRR ARMORED SVC Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.. 207844 03/22/22 - LIGHT BALLAST & LIGHT BULBS... Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 207834 04/30/22 - SERVICE CHARGE Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 Fund 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 1,312.50 775.00 3,987.50 657.50 1,705.00 37.50 3,240.00 75.00 465.00 1,290.00 1,237.50 892.50 1,320.00 78,343.20 892.35 767.10 1,256.56 232.15 120.98 -18.00 228.27 9.09 11.89 5,371.07 13.00 64.03 63.51 145.85 9,157.85 170.85 2,078.73 81.70 810.00 2,598.56 20,643.00 1,877.00 66.17 1,153.24 3,480.21 1,190.00 217.06 34,366.52 Grand Total: 547,159.28 185 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03136 - 05/20/22 JB Fund Summary Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND 201 - GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-20303 101-0000-20325 101-0000-20947 101-0000-20948 101-0000-20955 101-0000-43635 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60129 101-1006-60103 101-1006-60320 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60402 101-1007-60403 101-1007-60470 101-2001-60174 101-2002-60670 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61200 101-2002-61400 101-3002-60107 101-3003-60184 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60423 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60432 101-3005-60691 101-3005-61201 101-3005-61204 101-3005-61206 101-3005-61208 101-3005-61209 101-3005-61300 101-3007-60461 101-3008-60115 101-3008-60196 101-3008-60431 101-3008-60667 101-3008-60691 101-3008-61200 101-6004-60103 101-6004-60108 101-6004-60125 101-6004-60400 101-6006-60125 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name TBID Due to VGPS Due to County Recorder Life Insurance Pay Add'I Life Insurance Pay Disability Insurance Pay VGPS TBID Admin Fee Annual Wellness Dollar Re... Consultants/Employee Se... Recruiting/Pre-Em ployme... Professional Services Travel & Training Office Supplies Forms, Copier Paper Citywide Supplies Postage Blood/Alcohol Testing Fire Station Maintenance/Services Water - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Instructors Fritz Burns Pool Program... Fritz Burns Pool Maintena... Supplies -Graffiti and Van... Materials/Supplies Tools/Equipment Maintenance/Services Water -Monticello Park - ... Water -Fritz Burns Park - ... Water -Desert Pride - Utili... Water -Seasons Park - Uti1... Water -Community Park -... Telephone - Utilities Marketing & Tourism Pro... Janitorial Annual Perm its/Inspectio... Materials/Supplies HVAC Maintenance/Services Water - Utilities Professional Services Technical Temporary Agency Servic... Office Supplies Temporary Agency Servic... Expense Amount 385,698.03 478.81 13,892.81 16,569.88 5,470.51 2,300.00 78,343.20 9,157.85 34,366.52 881.67 547,159.28 Expense Amount 192,758.00 470.00 5,405.77 2,774.62 13,834.08 -9,637.90 425.00 615.00 570.00 347.28 75.00 16.51 56.94 396.91 37.82 61.22 8,218.44 494.63 737.43 110.50 527.80 4,659.97 7,018.41 25.74 1,286.25 189.98 12,815.00 1,259.97 154.24 215.89 28.22 193.61 47.34 9,147.49 26,215.74 143.88 1,380.70 3,549.00 1,080.00 96.40 3,648.15 20.00 3,429.69 250.03 1,645.29 Prig( "6 o 186 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03136 - 05/20/22 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-6006-60420 Operating Supplies 133.07 101-7001-60320 Travel & Training 193.08 101-7002-60103 Professional Services 35,681.60 101-7003-60103 Professional Services 42,175.75 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 167.76 101-7003-60432 Tools/Equipment 890.67 101-7006-60104 Consultants 112.50 101-7006-60144 Contract Traffic Engineer 9,380.00 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 167.56 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 431.50 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 47.31 202-3004-60115 Janitorial 5,502.78 202-3004-60667 HVAC 5,800.89 202-3006-60115 Janitorial 1,454.16 202-3006-60667 HVAC 829.99 202-3006-60691 Maintenance/Services 123.95 202-3006-61200 Water -Utilities 181.04 215-7004-60420 Operating Supplies 381.68 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 11,270.81 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 629.26 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utiliti... 38.33 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utilities 4,249.80 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutions 5,470.51 237-9001-60104 Consultants 2,300.00 401-0000-60103 Professional Services 26,105.00 401-0000-60108 Technical 25,788.50 401-0000-60188 Construction 26,449.70 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 6,202.20 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and Up... 415.74 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Mainte... 2,526.91 501-0000-60678 Street Sweeper 13.00 502-0000-13600 Prepaid Expense 20,643.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 1,877.00 502-0000-60662 Copiers 2,598.56 502-0000-61301 Cell/Mobile Phones 5,443.45 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 3,804.51 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 104.37 601-0000-60660 Repair & Maintenance 777.30 Grand Total: 547,159.28 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 369,687.49 111205P Professional Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-543 892.50 151609P Professional Expense La Quinta X Park 1,290.00 201603P Professional Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovationlr 8,105.00 201603T Technical Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation Ir 12,770.50 201701P Professional Expense Washington Street at Fred Waring 1,237.50 201709P Professional Expense Ave 53 Jefferson St.Roundabout 3,987.50 201804E Landscape & Lighting Median Island ... Landscape & Lighting Median Islan 8,540.12 201806E SilverRock Event Modular Building E... SilverRock Event Space Modular Br 19.15 201901P Professional Expense Village Art Plaza Promenade & Cull 775.00 202007CT Construction Expense SilverRock Retention Basin Soil Sta 1,320.00 202007P Professional Expense SilverRock Retention Basin Soil Sta 75.00 202008P Professional Expense Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Proj 37.50 202102P Professional Expense Fritz Burns Park Improvements 657.50 202103P Professional Expense Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Imprc 465.00 202104P Professional Expense Citywide Striping Refresh 3,240.00 4 Piii, 6 7 187 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03136 - 05/20/22 JB Project Account Key 202109P 202110CT 202117P 202118E 2122PMPP 2122PMPT 2122TMICT BDAYE CORONANR CSA152E STVRE Project Account Summary Project Account Name Professional Expense Construction Expense Professional Expense Avenue 47 Sidewalk Improvements ... Professional Expense Technical Expense Construction Expense City Picnic & Birthday Celebration Ex... Corona Non Reimbursable CSA 152 Expenses Short Term Vacation Rental Expense Grand Total: Project Name Traffic Management Center X-Park Additional Parking Jefferson Street Slurry Seal Improv Avenue 47 Sidewalk Improvement FY21/22 Pavement Management F FY21/22 Pavement Management F FY21/22 Traffic Maintenance Impri City Picnic & Birthday Celebration Corona Virus Emergency Response CSA 152 Project Tracking Short Term Vacation Rental Trackh 547,159.28 Expense Amount 2,325.00 4,807.45 1,312.50 42,175.75 1,705.00 13,018.00 20,322.25 8,320.82 730.00 35,694.60 3,648.15 188 City of La Quintal Demand Register Packet: APPKT03142 - 05/27/2022 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND IMSA CERTIFICATION 207915 5/19/22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAINING A.CAB... Travel & Training 101-7006-60320 930.00 IMSA CERTIFICATION 207915 5/19/22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAINING C.CRUZ Travel & Training 101-7006-60320 930.00 SOUTHLAND APPLIANCE 207938 01/14/22 - FS #32 WATER LEAKING REPAIR Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 185.00 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 207929 05/09/22 - BALL CAPS (80) FOR CITY BDAY Marketing & Tourism Promoti... 101-3007-60461 604.77 BATRES, JESSE 207880 02/16-02/17/22 - TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB .. Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 173.33 MAGALLON, ARMANDO 207922 05/17/22 - ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS A.. Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 FUSON, JACOB 207902 05/17/22 - ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 DELGADO, JESSICA 207894 05/19/22 - ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 HALLICK, ROSEMARY 119 05/04-05/05/22 - TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 378.80 MCGINLEY, LAURIE 207923 5/23/22 -ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS RE... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 LIMA, JACK VINCENT 207920 05/24/22 - ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reimb... 101-1004-50252 200.00 SAFECHECKS 207936 05/10/22- CHECK STOCK 27001-29000 Printing 101-1006-60410 591.67 DOOR TECH, LLC 207895 04/29/22 - DOOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT ... Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 380.63 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 207898 05/17/22 - RESTROOM PARTS FOR X-PARKS Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 225.89 CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF PUBLIC 207883 05/15/22 - CAPIO MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL.. Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 275.00 JOE A GONSALVES & SON 207917 06/2022 - LOBBYIST SERVICES Contract Services - Administrat.. 101-1002-60101 3,500.00 CACEO 207882 06/20/22 - WEBINAR P.VILLANUEVA Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 600.00 CACEO 207882 06/20/22 - WEBINAR B.RODRIGUEZ Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 600.00 CACEO 207882 06/07/22 - WEBINAR C.GAMEZ Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 25.00 ACE CARPET CLEANING 207879 05/18/22 - FS #32 CARPET CLEANING Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 325.00 QUALITY STREET SERVICE 207931 03/30/22 - EMERGENCY STREET SWEEPING Professional Services 101-7003-60103 1,412.50 QUALITY STREET SERVICE 207931 03/31/22 - EMERGENCY STREET SWEEPING Professional Services 101-7003-60103 1,025.00 QUALITY STREET SERVICE 207931 04/25/22 - EMERGENCY STREET SWEEPING Professional Services 101-7003-60103 1,025.00 QUALITY STREET SERVICE 207931 04/26/22 - EMERGENCY STREET SWEEPING Professional Services 101-7003-60103 1,257.50 XPRESS GRAPHICS 207950 05/12/22 - LQ FALSE ALARM POSTCARDS LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 244.64 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207947 05/2022 - MONTHLY MAINTENANCE Landscape Contract 101-3005-60112 48,536.32 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS 207878 05/17/22 - EXCEL SEMINAR C.VILLANUEVA Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 99.00 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 207940 05/09/22 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1004-60400 41.72 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 207940 05/18/22 - PRINTER TONER & OFFICE SUP... Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 72.88 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 207940 05/18/22 - POST -IT NOTES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 16.63 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 207881 04/15/22 - BLOOD/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 375.00 COMMUNITY ALL-STARS, LLC 207889 9/2022-5/2023 LQHS CALENDAR SPONSO... Prepaid Expense 101-0000-13600 1,975.00 RASA/ERIC NELSON 207933 05/18/22 - FTM 2022-0002 ONCALL MAP ... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 2,410.00 ROBERT HALF 207934 05/13/22 -TEMP AGENCY SVCS J.AGGREH Temporary Agency Services 101-6004-60125 540.64 ROBERT HALF 207934 05/13/22 -TEMP AGENCY SVCS T.SUDAKO... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 635.31 ROTO ROOTER PLUMBERS INC 207935 05/16/22 -WC SINK REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 910.00 FEDEX 207896 05/04/22 - OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 20.01 INTERWEST CONSULTING GR... 207916 03/2022 - INSPECTION SERVICES Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 16,282.33 FEDEX 207897 05/13/22 - OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 42.08 PWLC II, INC 207930 05/2022 - L&L MONTHLY MAINTENACE Landscape Contract 101-2002-60112 1,304.54 VERIZON WIRELESS 207946 04/14-05/13/22 - EOC CELL (7813) Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 46.53 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERV... 207887 04/2022 - MSCHP FEES MSHCP Mitigation Fee 101-0000-20310 50,647.21 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERV... 207887 05/26/22 - MSCHP FEES CVMSHCP Admin Fee 101-0000-43631 -506.47 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 03/29/22 -TOWER FANS FOR POLICE (2) LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 205.54 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/12/22 - FS #70 SUPPLIES Fire Station 101-2002-60670 550.38 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 03/28/22 - SPRAY GUN & WATER FILTERS ... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 193.60 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/19/22 - BLANK KEYS FOR LQ PARK PU... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 14.25 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/18/22 - GRINDING DISC & BLADE FOR ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 31.66 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/14/22 - DISHWASHER CONNECTOR FOR.. Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 11.38 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/13/22 - PAINT & PAINT SUPPLIES FOR ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 66.78 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/05/22 - SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 156.05 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/19/22 - ENTRY DOOR HANDLE FOR LQ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 32.59 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 03/31/22 -TOOLS FOR R.MUNIZ Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 237.35 i m Demand Register Packet: APPKT03142 - 05/27/2022 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/11/22 - DOORSTOPER & WALL PROTEC... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 40.63 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 03/28/22 - FLEX TAPE & SEAL TAP FOR AL... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 28.22 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 03/29/22 - TORCH KIT & FLEX TAPE FOR A... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 107.58 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/19/22 - WASHERS, NUTS, & BOLTS FOR... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 11.90 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/18/22 - ICE MAKER INSTALL KIT FOR FB... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 66.96 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/11/22 - PAINT FOR FB RESTROOM Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 97.22 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/04/22 - PRIMER SPRAY PAINT FOR LQ... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 28.96 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/22/22 - CONCRETE SEALER FOR FB RES... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 52.97 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/27/22 - BUG ZAPPER Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 97.81 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/20/22 - DRINKING WATER CASES (4) Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 10.36 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/18/22 - PAINT PRIMER & PAINT SUPPLI... Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 132.90 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/05/22 - WET/DRY SHOP VAC & PAINTI... Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 178.72 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/20/22 - HAND TROWEL (2) Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 21.71 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/22/22 - SOCKET SET Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 48.90 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/20/22 - CLEANING TOOLS Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 77.46 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 03/31/22 -TAPE MEASURE & SCREWDRIV... Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 84.52 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING ... 207899 05/11/22 - MINI SPLIT INSTALL AT SPORTS... HVAC 101-3008-60667 4,832.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207928 12/01/21 - CH WATER TREATMENT HVAC 101-3008-60667 125.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207928 05/01/22 - CH WATER TREATMENT HVAC 101-3008-60667 125.00 GOVOS, INC. 207904 06/2022 - STVR PERMITTING SOFTWARE Professional Services 101-6006-60103 3,820.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING GR... 207916 03/2022 - ONCALL BLDG PLAN REVIEW & ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 3,962.50 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 207926 05/2022 - SPLASH PAD MONTHLY SERVICE LQ Park Water Feature 101-3005-60554 1,732.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 207926 05/13/22 - POOL FILTER LIDS & GASKETS ... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 384.29 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PUBLIC... 207891 04/2022 - RADIO MAINTENANCE Operating Supplies 101-2001-60420 328.38 WISH U WELLNESS, LLC 207949 5/03/22 - HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT RE... Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 105.00 TOPS PROPANE, INC 207943 05/06/22 - BUSINESS LIC REFUND LIC 001... Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 20.00 COAST SIGN INC 207888 05/20/22 - BUSINESS LIC REFUND LIC 000... Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 30.00 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE... 207941 03/2022-04/2022 - SAFETY ELEMENT PLA... Professional Services 101-6002-60103 978.24 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE... 207941 04/2022 - ONCALL PLANNING SERVICES Professional Services 101-6002-60103 3,210.60 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE... 207941 04/2022 - THE WAVE PROJECT PLANNING Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 9,615.65 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 170,993.52 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207942 05/18/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 435.87 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207942 05/18/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 487.42 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207942 05/20/22 - SAFETY GEAR Safety Gear 201-7003-60427 31.54 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207942 05/20/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 135.94 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207942 05/23/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 1,001.04 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 207942 05/23/22 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 1,601.67 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 04/04/22 - CEMENT MIX Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 10.84 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 3,704.32 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND DOOR TECH, LLC 207895 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207947 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207947 KLUZ INTERNATIONAL CORPO... 207919 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207928 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITION... 207928 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS... 207901 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207944 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207944 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207944 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 207944 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 207947 CREATIVE LIGHTING & ELECTR... 207892 MACIAS NURSERY, INC. 207921 PWLC II, INC 207930 PWLC II, INC 207930 04/29/22 - DOOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT ... 05/2022 - MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 05/2022 - MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 05/20/22 - MAKERSPACE EQUIPMENT 12/01/21 - LIBRARY WATER TREATMENT 05/01/22 - LIBRARY WATER TREATMENT 05/13-06/12/22 - MUSEUM PHONE Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 Landscape Contract 202-3004-60112 Landscape Contract 202-3006-60112 Machinery & Equipment 202-3009-80100 HVAC 202-3004-60667 HVAC 202-3004-60667 Telephone - Utilities 202-3006-61300 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total 05/10/22 - LANDSCAPE ROCK AT AVE 54 Materials/Supplies 05/11/22 - LANDSCAPE ROCK FOR AVE 54 Materials/Supplies 05/12/22 - LANDSCAPE ROCK FOR AVE 54 Materials/Supplies 05/13/22 - LANDSCAPE ROCK FOR AVE 54 Materials/Supplies 05/2022 - MONTHLY MAINTENANCE Landscape Contract 05/2022 - LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVI... Consultants 04/11/22 - PLANTS Materials/Supplies 05/2022 - L&L MONTHLY MAINTENACE Landscape Contract 5/9-5/13/22 - ROCK REPLACEMENT FOR A... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60431 215-7004-60431 215-7004-60431 215-7004-60431 215-7004-60112 215-7004-60104 215-7004-60431 215-7004-60112 215-7004-60691 380.62 812.59 169.58 1,330.94 125.00 125.00 122.98 3,066.71 2,794.01 2,853.64 2,859.44 2,838.02 10,589.51 5,667.17 1,212.19 54,741.84 4,560.00 Prig( 2o; 6 190 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03142 - 05/27/2022 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS... 207901 05/07-06/06/22 - PHONE SVC FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS... 207901 05/10-06/09/22 - PHONE SVC Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND XPRESS GRAPHICS 207950 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 Fund: 224 - TUMF FUND COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC OF... 207886 Fund: 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple) TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE... 207941 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND SIGNATURE SCULPTURE 207937 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207918 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207918 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207918 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 207918 HCD 207906 HCD 207905 HCD 207909 HCD 207911 HCD 207910 HCD 207907 HCD 207908 R DEPENDABLE CONST INC 207932 CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES ... 207890 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 SPOHN RANCH INC 207939 SPOHN RANCH INC 207939 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR... 207948 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTR... 207948 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT HWY 111 LA QUINTA CAR WA... 207914 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 PACIFIC MOBILE STRUCTURES, .. 207927 NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP 207925 NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP 207925 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ... 207885 FISHERINTEGRATEDINC 207900 FISHERINTEGRATEDINC 207900 VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC 207945 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 207924 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 207884 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 DAVE BANG, INC. 207893 Account Name Account Number Amount Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 111.59 Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 40.68 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 88,268.09 05/17/22 - STICKERS RECYCLE AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 82.26 03/30/22 - PLANTING SUPPLIES FOR BEND... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 1,611.33 Fund 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total: 1,693.59 04/2022 - TUMF FEES TUMF Payable to CVAG 224-0000-20320 85,778.60 Fund 224 - TUMF FUND Total: 85,778.60 03/2022-04/30/22 - HOUSING ELEMENT P... Professional Services 244-0000-60103 2,888.75 Fund 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple) Total: 2,888.75 05/23/22 - MOSAIC & STAGECOACH REPA... APP Maintenance 270-0000-60683 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total: 04/14/22 - NEW SIGN PANEL FOR ESPLAN... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,607.25 05/17/22 - EQUIPMENT TAXES Construction 401-0000-60188 334.69 150 — 5x7 R10-3E PB SIGN DOUBLE SIDED,... Construction 401-0000-60188 3,825.00 05/17/22 - EQUIPMENT SHIPPING Construction 401-0000-60188 72.50 05/2022 -REGISTRATION XPRK CUBE XC34... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,106.00 05/2022 - REGISTRATION XPRK CUBE XC3... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,106.00 05/2022 - REGISTRATION XPRK CUBE XC3... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,106.00 05/2022 -REGISTRATION XPRK CUBE XC34... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,106.00 05/2022 - REGISTRATION XPRK CUBE XC3... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,106.00 05/2022 - REGISTRATION XPRK CUBE XC1... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,106.00 05/2022 - REGISTRATION XPRK CUBE XC1... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,106.00 03/23/22 - FS #70 REVITALZATION RETENT.., Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 29,048.84 04/30/22 - CITYWIDE CAMERA SYSTEM M... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,396.91 04/27/22 - ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS Construction 401-0000-60188 16.31 03/30/22 - FUSES Construction 401-0000-60188 5.39 3/2022 - XPARK CONSTRUCTION RETENTI... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -5,945.31 03/2022 - XPARK CONSTRUCTION PROGR... Construction 401-0000-60188 118,906.10 05/18/22 - POWER CABLE & SUPPLIES Construction 401-0000-60188 1,422.03 05/20/22 - COAX CABLE FOR DUNE PALMS... Construction 401-0000-60188 2,550.19 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 160,981.90 04/2022 - CAR WASH SERVICE Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 501-0000-60676 12.00 04/11/22 - CAULK & KNOCKOUT SEALS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 25.13 04/06/22 - KNEELING PAD & KEY TAGS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 29.43 06/2022 - PW TRAILER RENTAL Building Leases 501-0000-71032 3,088.51 05/16/22 - CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 ... Vehicles, Purchased 501-0000-71031 52,404.38 05/16/22 - CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 ... Vehicles, Purchased 501-0000-71031 48,439.66 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 103,999.11 04/15-05/14/22 - WC CABLE (8105) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 154.52 04/2022 - MONTHLY FEE Consultants 502-0000-60104 1,100.00 04/2022 - CC VIDEO STREAMING Consultants 502-0000-60104 1,200.00 05/17/22 DATA PLATFORM BACK-UP FOR ... D & D, Software Enhancements 502-0000-71042 707.42 04/10-05/09/22 - MS AZURE ONLINE SVCS Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 762.29 05/13/22 - ADOBE PRO FOR J.DELGADO Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 490.50 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 4,414.73 04/20/22 - FB POOL OPERATIONS & PROG... Parks 503-0000-71060 1,869.96 05/18/22 - PLAYGROUNG REPLACEMENT... Parks 503-0000-71060 2,090.06 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total: 3,960.02 Prig( ;•t o; 6 191 Demand Register Vendor Name Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND STAPLES ADVANTAGE Payment Number Description (Item) 207940 05/09/22 - FOOTREST Fund: 601-SILVERROCK RESORT GARDAWORLD 207903 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 207912 Account Name Operating Supplies 04/2022 - SRR ARMORED SVC EXCESS Bank Fees 04/26/22 - HOSE FAUCET MANIFOLD FOR ... Repair & Maintenance 03/30/22 - HVAC AIR FILTERS FOR SRR Repair & Maintenance 03/31/22 - COOPER PIPE & FITTINGS FOR ... Repair & Maintenance 03/31/22 - SOLDER WIRE & FOLDING KNIF... Repair & Maintenance Packet: APPKT03142 - 05/27/2022 JB Account Number Amount 504-1010-60420 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 601-0000-60455 28.08 601-0000-60660 31.49 601-0000-60660 32.56 601-0000-60660 64.72 601-0000-60660 64.05 Fund 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 220.90 Grand Total: 630,494.41 Lri+qa" ',N. A' 8 tSG 192 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03142 - 05/27/2022 JB Fund Summary Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND 201 - GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 224-TUMF FUND 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple) 270-ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 504- INSURANCE FUND 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-13600 101-0000-20310 101-0000-20330 101-0000-22810 101-0000-43631 101-1002-60101 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60400 101-1006-60320 101-1006-60400 101-1006-60410 101-1007-60470 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60174 101-2001-60420 101-2002-60112 101-2002-60670 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61304 101-3005-60112 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60432 101-3005-60554 101-3007-60351 101-3007-60461 101-3008-60431 101-3008-60667 101-3008-60691 101-6002-60103 101-6003-60118 101-6004-60125 101-6004-60320 101-6006-60103 101-6006-60125 101-6006-60320 101-6006-60420 101-7002-60183 101-7003-60103 101-7003-60420 101-7003-60432 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Prepaid Expense MSHCP Mitigation Fee Over Payments, AR Policy Developer Deposits CVMSHCP Admin Fee Contract Services - Admini.. Annual Wellness Dollar Re... Office Supplies Travel & Training Office Supplies Printing Postage LQ Police Volunteers Blood/Alcohol Testing Operating Supplies Landscape Contract Fire Station Maintenance/Services Mobile/Cell Phones/Satell... Landscape Contract Fritz Burns Pool Maintena... Materials/Supplies Tools/Equipment LQ Park Water Feature Membership Dues Marketing & Tourism Pro... Materials/Supplies HVAC Maintenance/Services Professional Services Plan Checks Temporary Agency Servic... Travel & Training Professional Services Temporary Agency Servic... Travel & Training Operating Supplies Map/Plan Checking Professional Services Operating Supplies Tools/Equipment Expense Amount 170,993.52 3,704.32 3,066.71 88,268.09 1,693.59 85,778.60 2,888.75 495.91 160,981.90 103,999.11 4,414.73 3,960.02 28.26 220.90 630,494.41 Expense Amount 1,975.00 50,647.21 155.00 9,615.65 -506.47 3,500.00 1,000.00 41.72 552.13 16.63 591.67 62.09 450.18 375.00 328.38 1,304.54 743.98 510.00 46.53 48,536.32 384.29 312.71 237.35 1,732.00 275.00 604.77 532.25 5,082.00 1,516.52 4,188.84 20,244.83 540.64 1,225.00 3,820.00 635.31 99.00 72.88 2,410.00 4,720.00 321.98 232.59 /31/ 022 :d I d 3 8 ''04 Prig( "6 a;7 6 193 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03142 - 05/27/2022 JB Account Number 101-7006-60320 201-7003-60427 201-7003-60429 201-7003-60431 202-3004-60112 202-3004-60667 202-3004-60691 202-3006-60112 202-3006-61300 202-3009-80100 215-7004-60104 215-7004-60112 215-7004-60431 215-7004-60691 215-7004-61116 221-0000-60127 224-0000-20320 244-0000-60103 270-0000-60683 401-0000-20600 401-0000-60188 501-0000-60675 501-0000-60676 501-0000-71031 501-0000-71032 502-0000-60104 502-0000-60301 502-0000-61400 502-0000-71042 503-0000-71060 504-1010-60420 601-0000-60455 601-0000-60660 Project Account Key **None** 151609CT 151609RP 201804E 201806E 201907RP 202003CT 202012LEAP 202116E 21-003 E 2122TMICT BDAYE CSA152E MAKERE STVRE XPARKE Account Summary Account Name Expense Amount Travel & Training 1,860.00 Safety Gear 31.54 Traffic Control Signs 3,661.94 Materials/Supplies 10.84 Landscape Contract 812.59 HVAC 250.00 Maintenance/Services 380.62 Landscape Contract 169.58 Telephone - Utilities 122.98 Machinery & Equipment 1,330.94 Consultants 5,667.17 Landscape Contract 65,331.35 Materials/Supplies 12,557.30 Maintenance/Services 4,560.00 Electric - Utilities 152.27 AB 939 Recycling Solutions 1,693.59 TUMF Payable to CVAG 85,778.60 Professional Services 2,888.75 APP Maintenance 495.91 Retention Payable 23,103.53 Construction 137,878.37 Parts, Accessories, and Up... 54.56 Vehicle Repair & Mainte... 12.00 Vehicles, Purchased 100,844.04 Building Leases 3,088.51 Consultants 2,300.00 Software Licenses 1,252.79 Cable/Internet - Utilities 154.52 D & D, Software Enhance... 707.42 Parks 3,960.02 Operating Supplies 28.26 Bank Fees 28.08 Repair & Maintenance 192.82 Grand Total: 630,494.41 Project Account Summary Project Account Name Project Name **None** **None** Construction Expense La Quinta X Park Retention Payable La Quinta X Park Landscape & Lighting Median Island ... Landscape & Lighting Median Islan SilverRock Event Modular Building E... SilverRock Event Space Modular Bt Retention Payable Fire Station 70 Revitalization Construction Expense Citywide Public Safety Camera Sysi 202012 LEAP Funding Housing Element Update 2021 Seasons Park Playground Replacern Seasons Park Playground Replacen THE WAVE EXP CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT Construction Expense FY21/22 Traffic Maintenance Impri City Picnic & Birthday Celebration Ex... City Picnic & Birthday Celebration CSA 152 Expenses CSA 152 Project Tracking Makerspace Expense Makerspace Tracking Short Term Vacation Rental Expense Short Term Vacation Rental Trackh X Park Expenses X Park Grand Total: 630,494.41 Expense Amount 426,963.35 126,648.10 -5,945.31 17,117.30 135.80 29,048.84 1,396.91 2,888.75 2,090.06 9,615.65 9,833.36 604.77 4,720.00 1,330.94 3,820.00 225.89 /31/ 022:d I d 3 8 �04 Prig( 6 o; 6 194 City aL au Qt data ATTACHMENT 2 I�..iu iI�. ire ' 9 - 15/27/2022 Wire iraris ti iiiri Listed below are the wire transfers from 5/9 - 5/27/2022. Wire Transfers: 05/10/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK $ 184,273.73 05/13/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - CAPERS $ 4,958.85 05/13/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - CAPERS $ 14,102.82 05/13/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - CAPERS $ 22,039.78 05/13/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA $ 414.00 05/13/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA $ 5,698.94 05/13/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - J&H MANAGEMENT $ 30,192.32 05/17/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - AMERITAS LIFE $ 103.74 05/17/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - AMERITAS LIFE $ 259.50 05/17/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - AMERITAS LIFE $ 1,138.30 05/18/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - STERLING HEALTH $ 1,822.90 05/18/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - AMERITAS LIFE $ 5,526.72 05/23/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK $ 214,614.68 05/27/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - MIDAMERICA AUL $ 9,520.41 05/27/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - MIDAMERICA AUL $ 9,020.41 05/27/2022 - WIRE TRANSFER - MIDAMERICA AUL $ 9,121.54 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $512,808.64 W17 196 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 17 City of LaQU i �r ita C 11,.,. ".1 t, J CIIll IE Ili G u June 7, 2022 S1,.,AFT I .IE Il. G IN l,.,, GIIEIIND o T' 1""ILIE':: ACCEPT WASHINGTON AND FRED WARING TRIPLE LEFT PROJECT NO. 2017-01, LOCATED AT THE WASHINGTON STREET AND FRED WARING DRIVE INTERSECTION IR IIECO II E II ID n 'w'i IN Accept the Washington and Fred Waring Triple Left Project as complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $64,573, thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. E E C U'T']I E S t1IIKMA1r1Y • The Washington and Fred Waring Triple Left project created triple left turn lanes on all four approaches to the Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive intersection (Attachment 1). The work is complete and Council acceptance will close the contract and allow final payment. f`MC L IMPAcr The following is the financial accounting for Project No. 2017-01: Original Contract Amount $ 1,276,000 Change Orders No. 1 - 2 $ 15,463 Final Contract Amount $ 1,291,463 Project Budget $ 1,860,744 Final Contract Amount ($ 1,291,463) Design, Professional, & Personnel Costs $ 254,071 Inspection, Survey, Plans, & Other Construction Costs ($ 193,72D Remaining Balance $121,488 * All costs to date have been accounted for and no further costs are anticipated. The final retention amount of $64,573 will be paid from account number 401- 0000-20600. 197 The following is the final cost share breakdown: Agency Project Percentage Share Project Cost Share CVAG 75% $1, 304,442 La Quinta 12.5% $217,407 Palm Desert 6.25% $108,704 Indian Wells 6.25% $108,704 CIK: � IiF O I l II I NAILYS'IS On August 4, 2020, Council awarded a $1,276,000 contract to Onyx Paving Company, Inc. On October 30, 2020, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a 65-working day completion time starting on November 2, 2020 and ending on February 10, 2021. The project was deemed substantially complete on November 22, 2021. Contract Change Order No. 1 was issued to allow for dry well abandon in place. Contract Change Order No. 2 was issued for additional work (storm drain cleanout, install main line irrigation, additional signage and striping, keystone, and rip rap around dry well). Delays in material availability and negotiations for liquidated damages, and additional time and labor extended the completion date to May 6, 2022. The liquidated damages were assessed to cover the delay in the Contractor ordering required material to complete the street name sign installation. The project construction effort is complete and in compliance with the plans and specifications. Staff recommends acceptance and release of the retention thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. L1 IE III IN "I E S Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Carley Escarrega, Management Assistant Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map ATTACHMENT 1 L r) LL I 199 200 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 18 City of LaQU i �n"ta C 11,.,. , C`0 LJ C I IM IE IET � 1u J u n e 7, 2022 1,.,, AFT I JE IP IN I,.,, AGEIKDA T'riI""ILIE':� APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2021-08 LOCATED IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS RIIECO II E IN ID n 'T'I IN Approve plans, specifications, engineer's estimate, and authorize staff to bid the Citywide Slurry Seal Improvements located in various locations. EXECUT]IIVE "IJIII Ifs III .Y • The Fiscal Year 2021/22 Pavement Management Plan (PMP) improvements includes over 1,500,000 feet of slurry (Attachment 1). o Avenida Villa: over 252,000 square feet of slurry o Avenida Navarro: over 242,000 square feet of slurry o Avenida Montezuma: over 6,000 square feet of slurry o Calle Estado: over 36,000 square feet of slurry o Avenue 52: over 142,000 square feet of slurry o Desert Club Drive: over 100,000 square feet of slurry o Springtime Way: over 43,000 square feet of slurry o Dune Palms Road: over 180,000 square feet of slurry including striping to delineate bike lanes further; and o Desert Pride Neighborhood (located on the west side of Adams Street between Miles Avenue and Blackhawk Way): over 488,000 square feet of slurry F'1SSC L IKIRAcr The 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) allocates $1,500,000 of Measure G Funds with $853,000 in carry-over funding. The following is the project budget: Total Budget Design: $ 60,000 Professional: $ 30,000 Construction: $ 1,200,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 70,000 Contingency: $ 1401000 Total Budget: $ 11500,000 201 BACKBACKG 11 IJ 14 D /ANALY&IS The PMP funds improvements to maintain and upgrade City roadways. The PMP is divided into phases and the City typically implements PMP projects during the summer, when traffic congestion is less. This fiscal year's improvements will slurry over 1,500,000 square feet of pavement and include minor pothole repair and minor striping improvements. The striping improvements mostly include better delineation for the bike lanes and add green paint backgrounds. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on June 8, 2022, the following is the project schedule: Council Bid Authorization Bid Period Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (30 Working Days) Accept Improvements L'TIIII IIIIJNXI""'I E S June 7, 2022 June 8, 2022 to July 6, 2022 July 19, 2022 July 19 to August 15, 2022 August 15 to September 26, 2022 October 2022 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 202 Attachement 1 FY 2021/22 Pavement Management Plan Improvements FRED WARING PROJECT SITE MONTEZUMA PROJECT SITE DESERT PRIDE DEVELOPMENT CALLE ESTADO+AVENUE 52-IDESERT CLUB DRIVE+SPRINGTIME WAY PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP 203 204 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 19 City of LaQU i �n"ta C 11,.,. , C`0 LJ C I IM IE IET G 1u J u n e 7, 2 0 2 2 1,.,, AFT I JE IP IN I,.,, GIIEIINIID T'riI""ILIE':� APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE SILVERROCK PARK VENUE WIFI AND CAMERA BACKBONE PROJECT R IIECO II E IN ID n 'w'I IIN Approve plans, specifications, engineer's estimate, and authorize Staff to bid the SilverRock Park Venue WIFI and Camera Backbone Project located at the SilverRock Venue Park. EXECLIT]IIVE SQ1WMXR.Y • This project will place 24-strands of fiber from the intersection of SilverRock (Talus) Way and Avenue 52 to the Alongi Building on -site at SilverRock Park Venue to allow for the future expansion of the City's WIFI Network and installation of cameras (Attachment 1). This project is being requested for safety, resident use, and event use. • This project is not currently a part of the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Staff is currently only requesting authorization to advertise and will present bids and request for funding at a separate meeting. 1° ° SC L IlMlPAcr There is currently no fiscal impact to advertise the project. The following is the anticipated project budget: Total Budget Professional/Design: $ 11,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 10,000 Construction: $ 97,000 Contingency: $ 12,000 Total Budget: $ 130,000 205 B " IR. " IJ II' ID /ANALYS1S Staff is recommending adding cameras for safety and WIFI for both resident use and events as part of the on -going improvements at SilverRock Park Venue and the initiative to include smart infrastructure at facilities. This project will complete the backbone for the fiber needed for camera and network connection back to City Hall. The fiber will connect from the intersection of SilverRock (Talus) Way and Avenue 52 to the Alongi Building. The installation of cameras and establishing the network connection with modem for WIFI connection will be completed with separate projects. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on June 8, 2022, the following is the project schedule: Council Bid Authorization Bid Period Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (15 Working Days) Accept Improvements L'TIIII IIIIJN "I""'I E S June 7, 2022 June 8, 2022 to July 6, 2022 July 19, 2022 July 19 to August 15, 2022 August 15 to September 2, 2022 September 2022 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 206 SilverRock Venue Vicinity Map II" S ..... ......... arC . M Jvt' k- . a r�rdEl V Y"i rsW F Ci P G w I : .. .. .. WL� ryd .. • ..I�rv4L5C �'�i VY �U I9 WJ'.wu�@,�^^" n4A4Mw VN pVM�1NUNWI WP 4 W*M�WIW ��Wnm4 4N 41µ MW vnµ U"M� WW'In NN !� U X ". ,. .. ..,. .. ..: d „� (� . 111 F rl 1 r.�. "lv > "'ti � Legend Blueline Streams City Areas World Street Map Notes From SilverRock Way to Jefferson Street � i *IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of 0 3,009 6,019 Feet the user. REPORT PRINTED ON...2/21/2019 2:50:13 PM © Riverside County GIS 207 le]►6y■►1d[iL•1■■►IRJAJI lt�■u■►[�i1►Zi] LA QUINTA HOUSING AUTHORITY III IIIIf11111! IIIII I IIIIf11111!""'11111""'1ING MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 3, 2022 CALL TO ORDER A regular quarterly meeting of the La Quinta Housing Authority was called to order at 7:58 p.m. by Chairperson Sanchez. This meeting provided teleconferencing accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-60-20 and N-08-21 executed by the Governor of California, and subsequently Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361, 2021), enacted in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Authority Members Evans, Fitzpatrick, Pena, Radi, and Chairperson Sanchez ABSENT: None VERBAL ANNOUNCEMENT - AB 23 was made by Authority Secretary Radeva. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager/Executive Director McMillen, City Attorney/Authority Counsel Ihrke, City Clerk/Authority Secretary Radeva, Acting Deputy City Clerk McGinley, Director of Business Unit and Housing Development Villalpando, Management Analyst Kinley, and Community Resources Manager Calderon PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Authority Member Fitzpatrick led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Authority Director McMillen said the staff report for Business Session Item No. 1 should have referenced fiscal years 2021/22 and 2022/23, which staff will note during the presentation. Council concurred. HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES Page 1 of 3 MAY 3, 2022 III3II[°CIA III,,,, Ili llf it ll[° "'III71 IIN QIQ CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY QUARTERLY MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2022 MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Authority Members Fitzpatrick/Evans to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPROVE BUDGET APPROPRIATION AND FUNDING TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO AREA HOMELESS SERVICE PROVIDERS AND HOMELESS PREVENTION PARTNERS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 AND 2022/23 Management Analyst Kinley presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Authority Members discussed chronic homelessness and the services and resources provided by CV Housing First program, administered through the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG); Galilee Center offers assistance by providing food, clothing, and basic needs for local disadvantaged children, families, and farm workers in the East Coachella Valley, including a 75-bed shelter; providing funding to the Galilee Center would help alleviate demand of services on the rest of homelessness service providers; if funding for the Galilee Center is approved, it will be specific to fund operations; benefits of funding regional as well as local services; and numerous grant funding La Quinta has provided to the Galilee Center over the years. Chairperson Sanchez said Erica Felci, Assistant to the Executive Director at CVAG, provided WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS thanking the Authority and the City's for its continued partnership and support of the CV Housing First regional program over the years. PUBLIC SPEAKER IN -PERSON: Kay Wolff, La Quinta - said she has visited the Galilee Center many times; those who stay at the shelter can stay as long they need; refugees are provided governmental assistance to comply with immigration requirements, and assistance with immigration filings; the center provides food and medical services to those staying at the shelter, and once a week food distributions are provided to the community; and the on -site thrift shop offers goods at very low costs. HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES Page 2 of 3 MAY 3, 2022 III3Ilfi°CIA111 IM IlfirIlfi°"'II171IIN 210 Authority Member Evans noted she will support Funding Option No. 3, as presented in the staff report, providing funding for the Galilee Center, even though she believes their services do not benefit La Quinta. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Authority Members Fitzpatrick/Radi to: A. Approve budget appropriation of $250,000 for fiscal year 2021/22 and $55,000 for fiscal year 2022/23 to provide assistance to area homeless service providers and homeless prevention partners; and B. Approve funding Option No. 3 as follows: a. Coachella Valley Rescue Mission - $100,000; b. Martha's Village and Kitchen - $100,000; c. Coachella Valley Association of Governments - CV Housing First program - $100,000; and d. Galilee Center - $5,000 Motion passed unanimously. HOUSING AUTHORITY MEMBERS' ITEMS - None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Authority Members Evans/Radi to adjourn the meeting at 8:28 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, Authority Secretary La Quinta Housing Authority HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES Page 3 of 3 MAY 3, 2022 III'JIII!ir 1 III,,,, I III!ir III!ir 1117111MG II 211 212 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 l Lzi Q lIi "W11-Y COUNCIL II IEIEl"II June 7, 2022 I o IFF IR INFO IR I" GIIEIIND"I""' 1""ILIE: ADOPT RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS AS TO SUFFICIENCY OF THE INITIATIVE PETITION ENTITLED ""PHASE -OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON - HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA," BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 RJII f ° III II IE III ID 1""'1 '" IIN Adopt a resolution accepting the certification of the Riverside County Registrar of Voters as to the sufficiency of the initiative petition entitled "'Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas in the City of La Quinta," by December 31, 2024. E ECL)"I",i E SUK14AR,Y • A Notice of Intention to circulate an initiative petition proposing to "Phase - Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non - Exempt Areas in the City of La Quinta" (Initiative), by December 31, 2024, was filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official on January 12, 2022. • On April 21, 2022, the proponents filed petitions regarding the Initiative, which were submitted to the Riverside County Registrar of Voters (ROV) for full signature verification on April 26, 2022. • The results of the signature verification conducted by the ROV established that a sufficient number of signatures were verified to qualify the Initiative to be placed on the ballot. The ROV has prepared the Certificate of Sufficiency of the Initiative, included as Exhibit A to the proposed resolution. F" SC L 'ill Ili C"I Funds for consolidated election services for this Initiative with the ROV for the November 8, 2022, election, of $40,000 will be budgeted in City Clerk Professional Services Account No. 101-1005-60103 for fiscal year 2022/23. Variables affecting the final amount include the number of jurisdictions that participate, the final number of registered voters receiving pamphlets, the number of measures added to the pamphlet, providing vote -by -mail ballots to all registered voters, and increases to postage, paper, gas, vendor, and staff costs. B C IKG IROI"I IN IID N L 'i 213 On January 12, 2022, a Notice of Intention to circulate the Initiative was filed with the City pursuant to Elections Code section 9202. On January 27, 2022, the City Attorney prepared an official ballot title and summary for the Initiative for use by the proponents for publication and circulation of a petition, which was provided to the proponents by the City Clerk/Elections Official on the same day, in accordance with Elections Code section 9203. On February 2, 2022, the proponents filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official the publication affidavit as required by Elections Code section 9206 and began circulating the petition. On February 2, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official contacted the ROV and determined the number of registered voters in the City of La Quinta was 24,487 (Attachment 1); and as of the ROV's last report to the Secretary of State (SoS) pursuant to Elections Code section 2187, dated January 13, 2022 (Attachment 2), and in effect on February 2, 2022, the number of registered voters in the City of La Quinta was 24,392. The Initiative petition must be signed by not less than 10% of the registered voters in the City in order to qualify for the ballot (Elections Code section 9215). On April 21, 2022, the proponents filed the petition with the City Clerk/Elections Official (Elections Code section 9210), which was submitted to the ROV on April 26, 20221 for full signature verification (Elections Code section 9211). The results of the signature verification conducted by the ROV established that all of the 3,667 signatures submitted on the petition were examined, of which 3,244 were found to be sufficient, which is in excess of the minimum number of signatures required to qualify the Intitiave to be placed on the ballot at a regular election pursuant to Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405; and on June 3, 2022, the ROV issued the Certificate of Sufficiency of the Initiative, included as Exhibit A to the proposed resolution. In accordance with Elections Code sections 9211 and 9114, if the petition is found sufficient, the City Clerk/Elections Official shall certify the results of the examination to the City Council at the next regular meeting. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk/Elections Official Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. ROV Email Dated February 2, 2022 2. ROV Active Registration Report to SoS Dated January 13, 2022 214 RESOLUTION NO. 2022 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS AS TO THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE INITIATIVE PETITION ENTITLED "PHASE -OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON -HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA," BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 WHEREAS, on January 12, 2022, proponents of an initiative measure entitled ""Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Hosted Areas of the City of La Quinta" (Initiative) submitted a Notice of Intention and written text of the measure and request that a title and summary be prepared by the City Attorney for the Initiative in order to circulate a petition; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2022, the City Attorney prepared an official ballot title and summary for the Initiative for use by the proponents for publication and circulation of a petition, which was provided to the proponents by the City Clerk/Elections Official on January 27, 2022, in accordance with California Elections Code section 9203; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official contacted the Riverside County Registrar of Voters and determined the number of registered voters in the City of La Quinta was 24,487; and as of its last report to the Secretary of State pursuant to Elections Code section 21871 dated January 13, 2022, and in effect on February 2, 2022, the number of registered voters in the City of La Quinta was 24,392; and WHEREAS, the Initiative must be signed by not less than ten percent (10%) of the City's voters to be sufficient to qualify for a regular election in accordance with Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405; and WHEREAS, the petitions regarding the Initiative were filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official on April 21, 2022 for prima facie review of signatures, and were then submitted to the Riverside County Registrar of Voters on April 26, 2022, for full signature verification, in accordance with Elections Code sections 9210 and 9211; and 215 Resolution No. 2022 — OXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Accepting Riverside County Registrar of Voters Certification of Sufficiency of Petition "Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas in the City of La Quinta" Adopted: June 7, 2022 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the results of the signature verification conducted by the Riverside County Registrar of Voters established that all 3,667 signatures submitted on the petition were examined, of which 3,244 were found to be sufficient; and WHEREAS, the number of signatures qualified, 3,244, is in excess of the minimum number of signatures required to qualify the Initiative to be placed on the ballot at a regular election pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405; and WHEREAS, on June 3, 2022, Riverside County Registrar of Voters prepared the Certificate of Sufficiency of the Initiative attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, California Elections Code sections 9114 and 9211 require that the voter Initiative be submitted to the City Council at the next regular City Council meeting following the certification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. Council accepts the Certificate of Sufficiency regarding the Initiative, attached as Exhibit A, and incorporated herewith by this reference. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption; and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the permanent retention. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 7th day of June, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 216 Resolution No. 2022 — OXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Accepting Riverside County Registrar of Voters Certification of Sufficiency of Petition "Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas in the City of La Quinta" Adopted: June 7, 2022 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 217 REBECCA SPENCER Registrar of Voters REGISTRAR OF VOTERS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE State of California )ss. County of Riverside ) June 3, 2022 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX ADOPTED: 2022 ART TINOCO Assistant Registrar of Voters 1, REBECCA SPENCER, Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside, State of California, do hereby certify that on April 26, 2022, the "Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta" petition was delivered to my office for the purpose of verifying that the signatures thereon were registered within the defined area. I further certify that the signatures on said petition were counted and examined by means of a Full verification process and that the results of said examination are as follows: That the total number of signatures submitted for said petition was ............. 3,667 The total number of signatures checked was ............................................... 3,667 The total number of sufficient signatures on petition is... .............................. 3,244 The total number of insufficient signatures on petition is ................................. 423 If you have any questions, please contact our office at (951) 486-7200. REBECCA SPENCER Registrar of Voters Matthew Ceballos Chief Deputy Registrar of Voters 2720 Gateway Drive I Riverside, CA 92507-0921 Mailing Address: 2724 Gateway Drive I Riverside, CA 92507-0918 (951) 486-7200 1 California Relay Service (Dial 711) 1 FAX (951) 486-7272 www.voteinfo.net 218 ATTACHMENT 1 From: Gordon, Candice <CGordon@RIVCO.ORG> Sent: Wednesday, February 2, 2022 4:08 PM To: Monika Radeva Subject: RE: La Quinta - Registered Voters as of 21212022? Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Exl-':RNAL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello, As of today, the total is 24,487 registered voters in the City of La Quinta. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Candice Gordon, Executive Assistant Riverside County Registrar of Voters p: (951) 486-7330 1 f: (951) 486-7335 County Micro: 77330 gggEd _n.@ ri rcea c rg From: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 2, 2022 1:50 PM To: Gordon, Candice <CGordon@RIVCO.ORG>; leticia.hernandez@ltic.com Cc: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Subject: La Quinta - Registered Voters as of 2/2/2022? Importance: High CAUTION: This email originated externally from the Riverside County email system. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon Candice and Leticia, can you please give me the total number of registered voters for the City of La Quinta as of today, February 2, 2022? Thank you. iNeva, iii� mm li Ik � ° Cii-1I1d°Ol° k��: Ot"Vil o Luu a 111ta) 7849o C i ,II I I iie.�.. i 1 II�'1 III I ��w"��� � a Q M I & In � d , 111i'1 +S��:y w w u 5 3 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov Confidentiality Disclaimer This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both electronic and printed, and contact the author immediately. 1 219 220 I U; N Onc0 O N co G.;, N Z'. I- '...: M N r r toy (¢ 4 C4 N ca to c? ! 1 sf i 0 0 'si'N LO N co ',I-NLO (n Nr 11 r- 00 NNNNN. M 1-- M N V V 1-- r 0 0) 00 of 0 , O I- r LO O N W O O N N W r V 00 O O N M (N N r (n V CO M O 0) Ih N V N CoV r- LO (n M O O O� M r v v (n co (O (O N N M V - co N M N V ATTACHMENT 2 M O M M M M M V I- V V r o0 M (n (O M r M (n CO W M I- (D W N V M co I-- I` r w Lo V M (D (D N r— ti2 V O O CO O r (O LO G O O N M N 00 r r N r M m V co (n (n co N N co (D O N V O m O c0 co m c0 M o0 O o0 O r- m V N o m O O o N M V O V V o Il- c0 N (n w M r V O O W O W M M M W O V M V N W N N Co (D O 1-- O M O (fl IN N W N LO (D M m r CO o7 (0 N m W (O m I- M M N (n V 07 O r (Q co m (O M O O (O co M (n t• r cc (n r In V CO I-- CO co N N N W o0 N O N V M (D r I- N V 0) r (D (3 (O (D M V O I- m W- M co O ti (D M (O V� M O V 1� M (O - -- Ln co o0 CO M N V V N O N W I- I- m- V- O V N" L. M r (n (n M V (n c0 n (0 O (o O V N O O (D V V N w N O N M (o V (n n O M O (n N N N W V W n I- In O O V I- N M r- (n r M I� O (D O V V (n O o0 wm (A O N wN M m m O V co N M V V N N a0 V'Q N M M (p (O c0 I'- I'- n (D (n V N M N N M M (n M (n 0) r N I� r O d1 M 1� (O N M N V N 11 r r r co r co N N r r N co r r r r - r r r 0 N (O N V I- LD I- W M (O M N Ln M M (O N N N W CD M I- CD V M I- O N I` V M ro (O N N M M (D I- V N CD I� O (O M r N co O LO O Ln LO O O r oD O� V r O I� N M M M 0) V co O M N M I- (O V N m 6) I� 47 N M N (A O V LO r r O c0 u) co c0 M LO O (c M O M N 4) I� r N N 0) N N � co M co LL ( (fl Ln N- CN c V N N M N N V M c0 V I : N O (O N O O CO -Q-N of M (O u) 0 c0 O N V N N N Q1 r LO r O W N O O O (0 M N m V N M LL2 O (fl N M (n M O M (O O r O N LO N I� m N (D m O W 'ITm O) r N N o m Lo (n V Co V (O I- r r r r O M N N r (oo o V I-- Q) m N c0 I- c0 r c0 N r LO I- N 0) O) O V I-- O O O CO V O W LO M (D CO O O W W I- M O N O M O M CO O M M V I- r LO O (D I- C) CO O (O m N N O I-- LO co N (O Lo O N O r r IQ-(o M M r N N M I- M I --CO N CO N N W O m N N nM N I� N N O O N (D m O I- r O W V I` LO W O O� M oo oo I� CD O c0 co r N N c'N co M O N r M r (D Ln V� W O r N N N co r co (o N O N 0) V I-- O) V O c0 V r M m O M O O M N r r N N r r r r V O N V 110 CO c0 M M N M V 00 V co O r (D W O O co N V r (D I- O M N O N M oD m LO N N oo o I- N (n M co M oo W N co M N r IQ-O r I-- O r N M r V AN (O N M co Co O CO M M O M I---LO 1- I'` r V N O V (n I'- O do N N M wN LO V M N � M N O I� N o0 r 0 0 M M (o O N 1� co (n (O co V N CO O oD M o0 N I- r V O N� (c O (o O r c cD O V oo O (n m Ln O M W O (D CO I-- (D N 0) M V O CO CO CD M I- (O N r O M V Lo r r m V V M I- M M« N_ N N V N r M� N h O co I-- co I-- LO N r M oD I- O o Il r N r V M o0 (0 M r (n O 1-N 0) I-- V ti O (D O V O O M m V CO V r r (O V m O (O N M M V r N CO r— V IQ-m (n 00 r r M 0 r M (D (! O O CO V O CD V C) V 0N V M co m I- co V N M N M M V I- oo O I- oD Lo N O co W O N (D O O M I� w 0) oo cc O r a0 r- Lo (n V N M r o0 I-- O (D co ti O V O O V M r O O M O M (O W o7 (n N N O M (O N C O c0 (O N N N r M Il M (o M I- 0) CO co 0) co M 'Q- (D O ti (D r - - - r N N M N N O M (D co o (D CD V N N N N M I: M I- N of (D O O N O O (A r r M N N r r N co V N U U U U U m ;k Lo N co 'IT LoN N yin N NMVLO ;k _ °_ QQQpp Yk-u u m m U U U U U d (n (n w c C c C c .N in in in in O c a a o o `o a o'o 0 o N Q d d d i ----- U U U U U — '� �'� _Q N N Q N V U U U U U +- C C C C C C 2.1 U U U U U jn N N N C C C w J J J C N O O O O O O U U U U U c c 3 c (n O O O O O @ m N N N.N N.N pQ��� UUUUU YU o 0 0 0 o UUUUU cc cc o oc ��� Q 0 0 0 Q Q Q m-- °— 2 2 (L 2 2 U U U U U ° _ m (u m r� a) a) a) a) c (� m o o a) a) U .�. fn (� N N m m �' >. >. >. >. >. >. C c c c c O N _o a -6 "o "6 m m m m m 2 N m@ m ca m_ C N N N N m L L L 4 L Q Q O N 0 0 0 C C C C C C E p N p a m N N N N L m C C C C C r� (6 > �% }% .>- }% E N N U) O O O E v) '- .In co u) C C C C C c 7 L_ E >� N L L L L L U C O O O O O N N N N N O E m m m m m m '- c m m m m m m O O O O O N 5 (p m m m m E m V o) D) r °) m m co N N N N N 0 N Z Z (a m m m m m N �' m m i6 V U U (� U o o () U U U U N m W W W W W o 2 c C p c C c c (n (n (n u) (n u) (n N °_ U) N N m m m U U U U U Q W 2 W ooUo a�a o Q ww w w n a 3 a 3 o0006 00000 60000 00000 0 -a U U U (n (n Q Q Q Q Q Q (/� o T T T T O 0 0 0 0 0 T T >, >, °° T T T T T°° >, >. T T T° >. In L to C L -2 L N C .L.. .L.. U) .L.. UI .L-- w ... .-. .-. .-. .-. w .>.. w .�^.. w +-' .-. .-. .-. +. .T+ .T. -- +. .-. +. .-. w .T.. ... .-. .-. .-. .-. .�.. ... > M V V (n N NM V LLn (ocO w I` NN M V IA UUUCiCiCiUUUUUUUc.iiiUL)L) UUUUCiCiCiCiCiUU > r r N M V L2 r N M V In r N cO V (O r N M V (n 0 C. 0 0 C. 0 C. C. 0 C. 0 C. 0 C. 0 0 0 C. Cl 0 � � o 0 0 0 0 � � on � � o o � � o O cD - N O A c0 r N (fl O r I�- - LN - N M V Ln (n In u) (n u) (n O u) (O I-L W W o0 o0 o� o� O �) L ) (n In (n O M M M M M M (n u) M V V Ln N N M V m (D (D to 1- r- 0 0 0 o 0 O CD CD CD r r N N N N N N N c7 cO M CO M o7 Co co cl) O r r N N N co M co M co co co V V 7 V V 4) Ln u) 4) LO m LO 4J LO LO LO LO LO LO LO Ln Lo Ln Lo LO Lo Ln Lo Lo 4) LO LO LO LD LO LO LO >. w r w O m N V r r r W r N N a0 O M N r r O r W r M O V M M M O M r-- r wM I� (D r r r r r V r (.'. M O N M N M O O N N M r LO O N o) O Ln M M M O O I� V V (D N N N LO N O LO (o N V N N V O V LO ,.. W eD W M M r M CD 'Q LO (O N O 00 V O N O N r r M r -- [O - r r r N N N r N 00 r r N r „LL.. LO N r r O N V M W O (D V N N M I-- V W LO O M (D co I- (fl O (D M (D V LO N O M w r r M O M (O M M N Cl) N N M W M W N V r M r W O r-O V V) O M O O O M O M (0 M W 4) LO W I- W O O V N O W M -IT M r r r T r Z;. of N O CO V O O (O W V W O M M Q1 V M O LO r V it N M N M O r N N r ry M M N N r M O r N N N r r r a, V O O r 0 r M d) V CO Lo O V LO (D co (O co LO 1� V a)N Ln O N M M LO O N M M LO V O N ,ItV "IM r S V M N N Cl) I- N V co N Co (o N M V N �,,.. OD r V V O I` I` (N O) N N V 00 (O (D OD OD 00 Q) W V �. N M 0 0 oD LO O I- W M LO V O r O OD N CO (D M O LO N V N CO LO 0 N M M LO a0 N a0 W r r M a0 V V 1, �'. M M Co N r r M N r r N N N (M N r N r r N M r .......... CO LO O r Cl) 0 O V LO M N r- O LO W M N M M V O .Wj N (O V LO r- N of r (D O (D LO LO 'IT N r V m O (D N V rl�r OD V LO V (D O OO O OD (D 00 r IT N 0 W LO O �'. M co co co O V V M M <M N Co LO V V V M N N M N N N r N M V Ln N N N N N y _N y _N k3k k k NM Ln ❑❑❑❑❑ p❑❑❑ N N 5 N C C C C C C C C C p p p p in in in in !n O O o o o O O O O .U �==—_ ❑ pppp UUUUU UUU C C C C T T T T T L) N N a) 0 0 7 7 (n C C C c N O N N N N N O O O O o o o o- 3 3 C 3 C- (a @ a) N (0 O C C C C U U U U o 0 0 0 o >>>>>� FA .n 7) N U U U U U> M a) (0 (0 M N W W W W E E E m a Q Q Q Qw E E E E c _o 0 0 0 o a� L 2 2 2 o m m m m m a) a) � � J 0 0 0 0 O O O O O p 0 0 0 0 Q O O O _T_T_T_T o o T >. >. _T _T o _T _T _T _T _T o >. _T_T _T c)c)c)c)6�c.)L)(..)(. L)�c�()c�c�c�v()L)L)L) N M V LO r N M V LO r N M V LO r N M V r 0 0 r r O r r O r u) Ln Ln Ln o Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln I� ti r; 1= 1= 1= o 0 o m m M M M M Lo Lo V V V V V Lo V Lo Lo V V LO LO LO N LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO o LO w N LO I- M N I-- M of N N (`D W (D N N LO (DLO M N LO O O CO LO I- M N (O M O M O O N M O O O (O V oo o r Ln (p (O O V N V Lo Lo V LO "r r-- O� r O LO r r O M M M N M� M M M M w r r r r r r N (N N LO r o0 M M N M N N N O 'ITO N N r- o M o M c)w Co LD V (D m M N I- o I- W O M N M m r- M w M N M V N O LO r o LO N N M w (O I- I` M LO O M (o Mu) cc)r cc)cc) r (o M (O V o) Ma) O LO (D r M M I� N� (D r O O (D OD OD LO a0 O W (D CO O O O W aD r I` LO N O V LO O of N M CO CO N V (D LD LO V N M N N N N LD r V V r N N V V LO LO V V V N r co N V w M oo w o O (O N N O N V V N Il- (D V O M I-- N M r 0 0 LO O w w r M W (O w V LO r 0 ao M W r M (o V o w V O V (O O r N N N r O N V LO (O M O N M M a0 r r N r N r r M O r r r r r r r O M M V O LO W O n O O r M of M V ti 0M 'ITN M M N O O (D W O O 'IT M V I- CO C0 aD V O O N Ln O W W O W o7 LO f� O N V LO 4) m V mO w I- r I- (D N CD r N N r mr m N N m r r r r r r M N N N (D N N N N N N N V O (!) V LOLn O r r� O V m m m m V m N O O N N N N M O ry W m r LO m (O r M r r r r r 0 r m N r r co O m (M r Lo zr LO (D O co CD o Lo N O M r V O Lo ti W O Lo a0 LO (D M LO r r r O T Lo M V N f� M LO V Lo N O) N o0 N N C2 N d) N O O r I- (` S r I� r r OD r� V O O o o0 N (0 (D (D O O Lo V r N O r N r N r O V o0 a0 (D O O M (D r co r M r r r v) r o O I- M N W w N M co V to LO r N O o m r M O (D Lo LO I- r V V w V m M N I- O LO M O O N M V LO N M o0 O N w N N V N V N N W N O O V a) co O N V (O O r O r V CC (D O O N LO LO (D W V r h 0 OD r O V r 0 (D (D N O M (D 'I - co (O (O co O M r V V r LO LO o LO V I- r r O V r r r LO V V V V N O (O V LO N N r r r W V I'- N (D r r- N LO LO O o) (O M (` N O N r O N O M N W O r w O O (o (O D) O M co M (o c)m r m r r (o V M M N r r� O rl LO o r N M LO M LO M r M N� LO O V M r of Cl) V N ti LO r� N r N 0 LO V O V NC) (D V W M LO I-- O r r V co LO LO co N Ln V L) N O M (h V d) M V M V V M N N O (O N M CO M V CO LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO r r r r r r r r r ^ r r r r r N M V LO C C C C C N () U U U U U U U U ❑❑❑❑❑ in Ln (n Ln 0 U U C C C C C p p p p UUUUU . .(���� c c c c c❑ o in fn fn in T C C C C C N u! N D a) ❑ p if D 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 -� a) N r) E tl) c O) c N r N M V LO CD r — U UUU U o y N C >UUUU a) a) a a) a u o o Qaaaa o-o-o-2-2-2-2-2 c,3 a) a) a) a) a) O p ❑ D" U) U) U) U) U) 0 0 0 0 o L't t o p E E E E E E E.n L s U U U U o>>>>c i m m m m m m m c C aS a a a a) a) a) o� o 0 0 0������zaddaddILa_CL w ) )') C C C C _ 2a (n N y N N CE'DcUwN N N N VoTO O o O O O aa) aa) aa) N a) a) a) (D O O O O TT_TT_ w.> > > > > > > w .U UUU U U U�xolx�� UUU UU U r N M V r N M V r N M V LO r N r N M V LO r N M V r o r r o r r o o r r o r r o 0 o LO Or N N N N M M M M A 4 V V V V V Ln 66 6L() LA Ln Ln Ln Ln OO Ln Ln u) Ln Ln u) Ln Ln Ln LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO M M (o (o w(o (o (o w I— � w w W W w w w w LO w LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO o LO N LO w LO N LO w LO N LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO M I LSLo O"M °''' N W"4 Cam) ttM5 °' m C(5 >' 'd (rhD, rM.r'. mod' h. 00 M 6J 43 (09 00),"a7 (M4 O Ind) 00 CN0 I`Ow N 4k (4''"M:N Vim' LSO m !n w).M m cq N m"u) r r m, a"as m p? M �w r,c c) m,.3 ry m u) N"u) w_ m M cV,a 0) u) M aD:o r cs t c) r us M:r (s r r r "o M r M •r"" (D sK5 NI s*i ch , r . " 0 srs "r a'S LO 'o O "Os (7 4 cis (Ct . +¢ oc C6 (L(y us C (Si (o r= 0, (D '0' N " , U) •r' cl ,= 00 Di ,= 4V a% tts NI (` i NI (`3 Ok a' Lfs c1 of ttti 4s N OSV 0) ,fF) 0 Ld) r M 0 . V M O 0 LO I--LO h O N M LO M h M M r M N 0 0 0 N M N N LO O M 0 (DM V N M h O N � r N V 'IT LO M M M M O M(D O h CO N h CD M LO 'IT M h O 'IT I--O LO h 00 h r m O O M h M m LO 0 LO LO 02 m O N M O V M M V N 0) h h co M 0) M a0 N r r r r N 0) M N M LO V V V N N N r (M N N O O M M V m r r r N V N g.' o N N h r- N r (0 ( '. O LO h LO It V M LO h 0) N M Cl) h V M 0) 0 0 � h h 'ITO O N N N M M M I'-M M -IT N In LO (D M h M h N V (o V O h d) IT 0) O (0 00 h M (D r M N M a0 Cl) N (D V co Cl) 0 � (T V M M M N V V M LO 6) co N (D co N (0 M V V r 0) (`0 M N O) r r h LO M V Z' LO LO N h M O (D V h I- O I-N M M V M M CD 0) V M d) LO h() V V M V M O LO M (D r co M LO h m V (0 l0 (O LO h h h 00 (A M (D M LO .4co N N M N V h c) co (D W co O Co M r 00 LO O r r N co 0 LO N r N N N M h r r r CO r (O V V O N r N N N r N N N N N r N r O O O O V (D N N N O M O) O h O h M O h O V r N N V r N h h LO V V O M 6) h r O V O N M (O 0 h N U) It M r N 0 (O r CO LO 0. O V M V M V h O N r N r r M N (D LO (D h (D a) 00 1- 'ITO O V V r ITa0 (D (D r r LO [I-(D (D LO N r N co Cl) r O N V V V V N N r NNN r N M V (0 U) (O -Itr 'IT LO h Lm M r M r r N M M LO M 4 a0 h N LO (D 0 M N (D M V M h 0 M r 4) M M O O O O (D V CO M LO r M h r h M h M N h h M M LO V N N N 0) O r V h h M h N N M h 0 LO (D L() LO h N V T r CO 0 m CO M M O O N N LO LO M M V 00 O M M V N (0 M M M M M M M M V r r co LO M O r Ju N O r N N r r Cl) O V O N 7 LO M M M (0 N 7 N r 0) O N M LO r r r N V (V N (D - - LO Z M M M M r h M h N N O r M M M M LO r 0 M r N N V O M M M M Cl) M M (0 LO O M M O CO N N h h LO N M V V O r h O O V O V a0 r r M M M r r 0) O O O) N (D r r h r N M co (M Lo r r r N N N N N M m Cl) M M M M N LO O N N r r N h h 0 0 Ln M Ln LO N r O M h r r r r r M M M M M N CO M co Cl) co co r r V n, Ln O LO LO M N LO M V LO N (D M M (0 h 0 d) h M O r CO M N (D LO LO LO h h V (D h N N Cl _N O a) MN LO h r N LO O d) I-M r h M V M N h m (O V M d) M M h M LO h O M M 'DV r V M LO M m m m h M O LOO coLN M V V m V V m N M h M M M h M M m 0 Q'. O N O O O O LO O r r N r N O M M O h V M N h O N h N N LO CO M M V V N N M V N N V V M N r r r N M V N N V co M r M r N O) M N r N r'13' LO M (D V r M M Cl) m V M r r LO N r O M M CO M N h M (0 h LO O O O O h h Cl) CO (M M N O h O O (O V CO LO LO 0) _V h 0) V 0 N M V r (D N h O h h M V M_ N O V W h h N h (D h 0 LO N O H O co M N h 0) LO co h (O M (D h M CD (D 0) h LO LO M h m h h M 0) LO V LO r LO O LO 0) W d) 00 M co M r M (D r M V N W h N (D d1_ (0 N O r r M M h h r (D N V V M LO Cl (' V h O LO 0) r M N r LI') N M T r M 0 LO h M V M d) (j) M 6) N LO C ! (D LO LO V LO (0 Cl) 00 r N h h N V LD CO M V Cl N (D M CO 0) N N (A LO (D LO S O N N M M r M M (D N r V M N r M Cl) LO N O h (.0 r r O V N V M M V M N N V N r r � r r O W N O M M CD LO LO CO N_ _ (0 h (D Cl) N h (0 CO (O V M IT M M O h r O V M 0 6) CO W N LO M h N LO O V O (0 V 0) M h 0) N O (D h M 0 0 0 r N O 41 m M LO m LO M V CD Lo M M CD (a)M (0 h M N h V V M M M N h (0 co h M LO LO M V M h (D W. M LO V M M LO 0) O O O N O LO N 01 CD r LO V V 0) CO (D M N N N N N M O N V O V M r V M V N N r O Co O M N V M r M N (D 01 0) O V CO CO V Cl) (0 r r r r r M M O O r T M O M LO V r M O N N O � V LO h N r Ln LO V LO Lo LO I-- r r r r r M M r N M N LO r N I-r N N N h Cl) Cl) V Cl) N Cl) V V It V LO N r r O r r N r N Cl) V LO d1 N N N N Q (D a) m a) a) U V M "O 0 0- O a) a; ¢ ¢ m E a U y co (n to in °¢ H H c 0 0 O- 3 2 7 L 7 d H r N M V LO (6 a s r N M V N .� a H H H H❑ ----- 'c H H H H H? K co U °) ❑❑❑❑❑ N❑ y(0 N y ((A O O r N M V LO Q a H N �.L..L� 0 N000000aa N CO V LO N M V LO !A U) U) N U a) a) a) a) a) o a) Q fl_ _ _ U Ykk 3'kk 3'k �#'k Yk Yk *k (gip❑❑❑❑ O +����tTw w ~~~~~%) L L N o U N N N N N N iT iT iT iT TT N U N N N Z3) N N N N N N❑❑ Q❑❑❑❑ t m 0 p] D) O) O) O) . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ m m w N ❑❑❑❑ Q 0 y y y y N m r a m a) U U U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o do 0 0 0 0 0 0— 0 0 0 °� o 0 0 0 0 E E E E E U V U U U U U o 0 0 0 0 0❑ o 0 0 0 0 o L° ° a .- > w w w ❑❑ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0.� o° U° U 0 0 0 0 0 d U T T>>> E o 0 0 0 o c �� .� 'c 'c '� 'c ❑ U U 0 0 0 0 0 o L ri (�i (�i (Li (�i U (� U U) (/r U) c c c c c C c C c C Y--------- ODUUUU 0 E c��� 0 �UUU t v u v 0 0 O(n(ndn(AdnUaaaaa� 0 7 7 7 7 C 7 7 7 7 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C M) c>>��= o 0 0 0 0 o E o E E E E E E 0 0 0 � U m U m �0 a) m m a aa) :� > 0 U U U U U U U CO) CO) co) o E E E E E c .c .c _c .c _c o U E o 0 0 0 0 .S a o a as as as as .� - c c c c c 9 c m 3 3 0 `m m `m m `m N ¢ E 0 0 0 0 0 2 m m m m m 0 a) 0 0 0 0 U U a m m w 'c c 'c 'c c 3 v 0 U 0 E E E E E a as a) 0 0 0 0 a) 0 a) " c c c c c c m 0 a) a) a) 0 a) E o 0 0 0 o C" a ° U U U U U. c c c c c.2 a) o 0 o a o f E 7 0) an 0) 0) 0) c 0 0 0 0 o Co a° E E E E E o 0 g a a a 0 m U r r r c as m a) m a) a) > E2 E2 i E2 a) m m -a -a -a -a -a c c c c o E E E E E a) c E m m m m m= a r a) a) m m m m (/) (n to (n to > i m -O c c E E c C E c 0 0 0 0� }j W a) a) a) a) c c O O O O O 'c C C C C C (p (6 (0 a7 (0 U a M a) a) a) m m _ ° E > > > > > > c (0 (a 0 > > > > > C a) a3 f6 (6 (6 a3 a) a) a) a) () a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `o a) ❑❑❑❑❑ 2 2 2 2 m a of of of w a, (a(n U Q¢¢¢¢¢ mm m m m m m m m m m m m V U U U U U "' U U U U U m c r N M V LO N M V LO N M V LO V O r N M V LO r N M V LO r N M V LO U U U (n O � r r r r c,r r 0 0 r r O r r O r 0 r O r r 0 r N M V LO r N M V LO d'-) U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U in U) do Cl) Cl) Cn In 0 0 0 0 (n 0 0 U (n (n (n 0 0 c,r n c,r o o U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 00 U U 00 U U U 7 D m D D m D D D D D m 7 D D m D D m o_ o_ 0 0_ o_ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ o_ o_ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ln Ln Ln LLj Ln Lj ti ti� I` O O r N N N N N N m M V V V V V V LO m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (T O O O O O Cl Cl LO LO LO . LD LO LO 4') LD LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO u] LO LO LO 47 u) 4) LO LO L() LO L() M LO r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a) a N N a oo I LID O (D LO 0) 0) M M Lo M V co N I� r V Ln 0) N O) O o0 Ln N N O O LO M 0 O N 0 (0 LO r O) N oO O M DO Cl) LO LO N N N CO V V M (O CO V r@ O) O O V V N N (o M 1-- N 0 0 ti N r M 6) N V M M N N M 1� O V O O) V (O 0 V M (o V V I� M h W LD N O 6) 1� O m N M M oo V N . N Ln M M N N c) O r N N r N O O (D r r r r r d) N N r r r N N N N N N 00 r r r r r 0) N r r r r (o co co co N M 0 (D I— I— r M I-- (O M N CO r 0) V r N LO V N r r r W C) N C)V r N N M (o LO c) r— r oo r V LO co O I— O (O r co M CO co a)of r N M O) M z N N r LO N N W O (D I— N@ r O r LO O r V oo O) O O O V M (o I� O LO M O co oo LO O Ln r— N V r (D w(o co M (O w c)N r O) M V W M oo O ,. M O) mr r V (D N (O Ln M V O O N Na) (DV rn (O r V O) (O r NNN n c) V r M� M wV W�� r W r O O� M (D V r (O ll LO N O) co co O V LO I- m V V V M co (fl V N r N— N LO M M co N M m V co (-) V co V N N N M N I-- V M co M M r of (O V Lo Lo Lo M r r r r r r N ,.LL r M M N r r M 0 Ln CO 0 V O M O r W N o0 0 OD r r CO Ln (D V M Ln N M O M V (o V@ M r I— O M O O O O (D M N CO I- M O 1— O O (D r r a;. N V M O LO M O M M t` M ao N N In M LO I— (O (D W (D (b Ln 0 0-0 N M V V O N ti CO V V I-- (O In O) M ao LT V n r r N M n r r I� r r N r r r (O r r r r r 3r r LO Ln coM V 1� r r r r r N In ti 0 O r ti ti O M M M O r r Op LO r (0 V N M LO M M O N I— N (D N O r— I— N CD V I— O V O M O of o7 co (O O O 4) M ao 0) M r Cl N 0 W M O V (O N N 47 Ln N (O co N N V 4) M 00 (0 V W M I- W aD r (fl N O M N O (O (O (O 0) r M C0 f- O O aD m V O r (O I� N (D V I— LO V V M co N co M O N N N r r 00 I— V r r M N N N r r I� r r r r r 0) r r N r r M N r r r r V M N N N M Z 0 0 0 W co co I- N O r O W O M r r V (7) N M N 6 N O V (D V I-- V V 0 00 0) V 0) V 0) of N (0 (o I- V (D I— N oD 00 CD N r LO O W W o W M V r- r r M W I- W I- r V (D m LO V V 0 N r LO M M N N N M r V V V V O r V to LO (O DO M M N V V LO - LO 00 (O r r (N O) r 0 ao N Cl) N N N r N cO r M LO r r r �,.. I� M r oD N N V ti 00 M OD N LO W(D V co N O 00 I-- V (D O r oM r O) (O M (D r O) n (D N ry V Mr� M d) N (7) V r LO 0) M oo C) LO LO M LO 00 of oo O r co N N r (O W (0 0) W V @ 0) V M o0 r V o0 V C) LO 1-- O V NM N I— V (0 N ID 00 LO N V 0) W 0) V N 1—LO (D LO (D W 0) LO d) M (O LO 0) LO (O Q. LO N LO r r r 0) M M 0) 0) O LO I-- a0 r N V I� M N V N V V M r (O LO O O (D V (D (D Ln N (o (O (o (O (O M of V of (D r N N M a0 00 (D r LO r r r M M r M N M M LO r r (L, W r, r V V (.0LO (D C) N CO LO V LO CO (O r (O V N W M o0 V W co N O r- W C)M LO V M ry LO LO LO Ln C) Ln C) Ln r N 0 O cO (O O 00 V r N (0 M �. N O M V N r (DV N Ln V M r r co (D N (O V (O LO Il- O r V 0) N O M oo V P- a0 M N V (D V W N O M N r r O M V N (O 00 r oo N M M M OD M N N N V M r r--M co N co 0)O r 0 oo M oo (D r r Ln co O) co C)W (O LO r O N N V (Dr (O V LO M r N O) Ln LO 00 N 00 M r of r C) 00 (D �.'. Cl) LO r (o V M h O I` M (D 00 N V N N N M N OD I� r V M Ln 00 V N M V V 00 I— LO LO LO Lo 0 Ln N Ln M co N N M CO Lo oo I— LO r r r r Cl) r N N r N r N N V r O Ln ti (b 0 0 0) r r co N @ O (7) r r O (7) (O O CO V LO 00 O 00 r M O Ln 00 N LO O 00 O V N M M O CO O LO O N O (D V O) LO (0 00 V N (O r r N - 0 M O N V r (O V V r r O @ r Ln M (D lO C, r— O I— V V Lo 00 V r V 0) M LO M r C) CD DO CO N OD W LO C) N Nn M Loo r (D 0) Coti W,. LO r N r r r r r— O O O (D a0 0o Ln V r O r r V I— 0) � r V M OD (O V r n oo V N LO VC N V LO OD W MFr LO LO (O N W N a0 (O N I� r CO ©i f N N of O Ln O O) N M o7 0o W oo O) n r r Lo N V M Lo V V M V V LO V V V 0) I- 0) O co O co co co V co O O r M N� N n O N O N LO r r r r V N N (N N V r r u) r r LO r r r r r Q � a N O❑ r N M r N M V Ln d o CO r\ N r N M V L\ @@@ @@@@@ r N M V L\ r r\\ \ F Q� a N a H H H H H H H H Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q r N M V LO H H H H F a H a H Q Q Q Q Q H QHQQHQQ u u v HHHHH (N co LO LE ❑ Q �.L L L L i i @ o@ o@@@ H H L L u L U c L Q Q Q Q Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ in vi m ui ui L L y in w (n w C L m m m m w .L in in in in in w (n m (n m N N (n w (n m in in y r"n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 o N N p❑❑❑❑❑ Q Q D❑❑❑❑ H H H H H H H H 0❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ C,❑ 0 p o 0 0 0 o N❑❑❑❑❑ 0 0 0 0 _ 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 � u � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _❑ 0 0 0 0 0 N L L L L❑❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 � L � L O O O O O O O L o L L L m m m m m U U U U— O L L L L L O O L L L L L L L L c '� L O L L L L L O L L L L L L U U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ (n (n (n (n O O 0 0 0 0 U U L L U U U U U (n (n fn N N (n m (n (n (n L U U U U U L U U U U U U a L L L L 0 __ aaaaLL U(n(n(n(n(n U 0U)0 )wU) 0cn(n(nU)U) 11)0U) 0U)co(nfn(n(n0 U U(n(n(nco O❑ O O O O O a) @ m U o�aaaaa�(n o000000000tn �aaaaa aaaa_0U) L o 0 0 0 0-- 0 cn Co a @ a) o o a) a a 0 aai aai 1)) LD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a � aai aai aai aai � .� � � � � a aai aai aai � aai ( j � (Li (Li (Li (i (Li 'c 'c 'cc a s .O w '� '� '� '� N N ;� w w w w O O O O O O O O O O_ ;�_ ;�_ _ '� w '� _ ❑❑❑❑ N 'C ❑❑❑❑ C c c C C C U U U U U U U U U U C cC c C c 'C ❑❑❑❑ c❑❑❑❑❑ :EC C C C C a a a a a T T T T -E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ U (n fn (n (n in (n (n (n (n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 N N N N N a) C C O O O O O ❑ y y y y y ❑ T T T T >, T T T T T❑ S m m m m ° o 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 a m m a m a) a) o° 0c c 0c c T m m m m m@@>>>>° c c c c c >>>> 0 m c a a a a @ @ @ @ o.oz ZZzZz 0 m0(n(n(nU) C C C C C C c c c c c.N.N Zo.N.)>>>>>>> @ @ @ @'2 aaaaa CO Co CO (6 (6 U U) D D D D D D .N o O O O O Q N N N N N N N N N t' 'C r r r W W W W W @ (n (n (n (n (n @ -O a O C c c c c N N N N N i L L L L c c c m W 0 0 0 0 0 c um OM OM U 0 0 N N m m m m m N @@@@ r ° `o 0 0 0 o m m N@ m m m E E E E C E Y m m m m m °� a o 0 0 0 3 3 E 0 m m m co o@>>>>> U U C) C) U C)U V U U U U 0 w❑❑❑❑❑ 2 2 2 2 J J J J J J a d d a- d a-co�� 0' � 0' r N M V r N V LO r N M V Ln r N M V LO r N M V Ln r N M V Ln r N co V LO r N M V O N O r Ln M r O O r r O r N M O r N M V Ln O r r O r r O r r O r r O O r C) 0 C) O M Ln CI O O O 0 O Ln 0 0 0 O O O M Ln 0 Ln 0 0 O CI O CI LO Ln Li M 4i Ln (D (D (D (D Co 0 w 0 W w 0p M 0 0 0 CI O O M 0 0 0 0 O O M M M M M M V V V V V V V M Ln M M M M Ln Ln M M (D (D (D (O (o (O (o (O (o (D (D (D (D (0 (D (D (D O O O (D (O (D (O I-- I— ti I— I-- I-- I-- M M M 00 ao M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a) @ a T W I W M V M W N r 0 O O LO CO W O 0 M M O O :'.. M O W - LD W N N O N N ch N N N N N LO LO r r r r r r r ( ,.. L0 1- W M M M O O r W V M In O O W Cl) V V 0 W d) O f0 LO 0 O Cl) N N r LO N r M M . .., W r O l0 W r I� W 0 O W M r W W p O W W l0 r r r r M M l0 M V O r r r (V r N LL,', W M N 0 M M O h r- M M o r o M o M r W W CL N V M M V M M W 0 (D V 0 N 0 W W W� r r N M M O W r N Ln Ln M W M O O r I-- 0 I� Lf) 0 r r M W W r- M 0 r- LO V LO N W W n n r W M W W N 7 N N M M N M Z., O LO O Ln W M 0 0 0 O V V N 0) 0) V N O O it O) N r N r (14 Nr� 'ITW V Lf) V N N (M N (M r r r 0..,.. 0) W I, V I, M N N M Ln N o r V O O N N o V N O N I� W (O M V M W M O N r N r N M W W 00 r d) O N NA N N N N N N V rl 0 V W N LO Ln 0 0 0rW (") LO r-- I- W�; VNTO� W NrW O0LOV W (D ION WWNV rf�f� M(' r M r r !. M r W L0 r- 0) W W r N r N N M W W O O O 0) W N W O W N V 0) W LO - d) to W O I- O 0 CD V O Cl) M N 0) O I- V V W. �T r pr' W O W M W W r f0 r N V r V M r �'. O N r N r N o f0 fn 0 N M r M V V V V r r N N N .N a) r N M V Ln �a�aa oco r N M V Ln U .0 U U U U r N M V LO d p QQQQQ'L m in v) u) Ln <����oa H H H H H w �❑❑❑❑ °o0 0 00 ww w win ❑ L U o .) (a)) N p'p 5p'p'❑❑ UO O O O OO . O u) O O OL U ULU "6 6 IS "6 aO OO OO O O O U n(n n n n aC LUUUUUoO 0 w N N aco LE IE: LEE= N N N N .E C C C C C> O (6 @ (6 @ S N N N N N@ U C U U U U U c6 O 3 a U (0 U U U U� u a) a) a U a a) o, o m m m O) m E m m m m c r N M V f0 N (M V f0 N M V f0 p r r r O r r r r O r r r r r 0 6 6 6C� 6 6 6 6 U (n U 66 U U 66 66 6 7 n D D D D D D D D D 7 D D D D 7 7 7 D u) m M LO W U� W W 0 0 W W W W W M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 04 04 04 N N M 40 W u3 Ida 4) W W M f63 W N N (D O 4) M r,h-, p - W #' , Y- NM, N, W Q M 9 Y 0 N h� h L!}:Y Y ta7 40 ,(4 O O ,M (0 10 N ',,0 W h d' O 0)� CO W O N N f0 -M N LO W, O 0 Y f I'+-'W 0 'ItM M V 'It M, N M N N r,0 0 W 0 N cfi V,) � L() ids N 0)c- M N N r (V, O W N O O LO I- M M 0 O 0 O V V V M M M o M O V m M V O V N M I: M O O N N M M O V h O N LO Ih O N h W O I- r W W I- M V cO V V V N M M V N 0 LO LO LO W r W V N N M N N N N co M M r O O O V N N LO lh h N r LO r r N co N r N r n W M N ;;r0 N W O W M W W M M O 0N I- M I- O IT r- M O M W O O M 00 N CO V O W N Cl) V (D W V N u) N m LO O r W 0 N M 0 V O O N o m 0 I- 0 O N W W I- O V W� W N V V O O V N 0 O� O W W 0) m r LO co V n W N 0 O LO co O Lr r--O a)O N M W V V co M M N N N m M r V r V r W O) V r O co m (d M N r 0 M M M M m N V r N N r 0 O 0) fn mm I- N o o f0 M V W W W N O I-M W O 0M M 0 n M W f� h M W r r O r V W M M UN) N O M V V V M O N N N N N n V r M n W W r r N V N r r r r r N N r r I- O N r N r- M M N M W O) 0 W r N M N o n M M M r O Ln LO N W lI) r M M V N o L N N M M V M I� O W W N CD IT N W O m (0 W V N M M N 6) N M r N O LO M I- (0 N V W C0 (0 N co M 7 M N r r m r r r N N r r O) 0) W W N W 7 r (0 � M r)� r MW N N M M W r WM f� r r N N V M r p N LO m W M0 O MLO l) I- 00 O� M Mr Mr O O CO O VLO O0MV0 Ln r V M M O M N LO O W V N V LO N O) M LO V r N W I� d) W W W LO M LO Ln W V N N 0) W O 0) r O N W M W W O I� O O r p r N V N O r o r W LO V V V W O O V W W 6) W O Lr N O LO Ln N V 0 LO r W N 0 r r r r r W r r r M W I- W r W 0) O LO N N N r r- M r W Ln W W I-- o O N LO r N 0) N M M LO O W M O O r 0 r LO M 0 0 0 r M O N O V W N W 0 M CO 0� N r V r co r r N p M o M r p LO M W't LO m f0 W f0 O M r- r O r Il- I- W O O W V ,r LO N LM W LO f0 W W LO 0 r 0) 0 co LO LO co N M W m I- O W W W I, N O co LO ( M M M N W N O M M M W M LO V LO 0 r M r 0 N V (O 6 V r r I� W N N O co r r N O (o M V W Ln V W N V W N N O V m M M N f0 W N N f0 m r 'ITr W r- r m V W r O W I'- W r N 0 0 0 M O M N co N N c)0 N 0 V N � W V M IT M M IT m d) N f0 I- V M 0) LO N NI- f0 r� N V O O V� n 0 (O r M f0 N 0) O (O M O Id) W N W W r M 0) Il- W n N M M M 0 r O W W r f` N CO V Cl) V (O r O N N r N r r- r r N W W M r O O r (O r r r W V r N r 0 r W 0 0 0 W cV Lo r N M V LO r N M V LO Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q `~~~~ . - F H F H r N M V LO o °o °o °o °o o u'L r c r c O L L L L L ❑ _ L U U U U U O O O O O ` tp cn M cn tq U (n (n (n 0 (n O O L O O O O O Q Q 'L U C C C L ✓) ❑❑❑❑❑ L L L L .0 ❑ L L L L L L U U U U U L i w in w w w 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O c U) ❑ ❑_ ❑_ ❑_ ❑_ O L L L L L S C C C C C c o _o ._o _o .O C O O O O O V U U U U U C O o o o o .2 E E C E C 0 0 0 O o o o y V) U) U) U) U) O 'C C C C C C❑❑❑❑❑ 'C LO U U U U U "6 "6 "6 "6 C ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ N N o N o S U (n (n U) (n UJ C c6 c6 2 0 0 cn v_) m rn N O w o w w cn rn O rn u)@ 0 0 0 0 0 v .L �'� �'E E N'L L E o E E E E E ` N N N N m a) a) a) a) . j E N m a) a) a) E O O O O O aaaada ������zao a- CL aa�cc���� r N M V v) r N M V ld) r N M V (O r N M V f0 r r O r r � r 2 2 2 2 2 2 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 r M V V V V V V W 0 W co W W N 04c\j u)u)u) o 00 o o o m m m m m m o o 0 o 000 N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M co M M M r N (n V LO 0 r C W c O Oo 0 0 0 0 0 W ' ip (6 i6 i6 i6 i6 i6 W U 7 3 3 3 7 7 7 0 0 W W W W W W W W 00 00 0 o o o o o o o U 0-o-a���a-oU O a) o o o o O c6 O c m m m m m m m m a (6 N cL fL) fL) E2 a) m C U) r N M V f0 M r O r r r r r r 0 W W W W W W W W W W m m m m m m m m m m 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CD O o O O o o r r L[] LI) LI) LI) m L() N Lfl Lfl LO M M M M M M M M M M U N U O O U) co U 0 C. Cl 0 V V I M a z: N o0 r 0 (0 O h V aD '., In M N h d) N V N co N V M N r LL.,; In h 'IT 'ITV (D N a M h (O fl u) N (D J O V N M M N N V r N N N M V V M m m mN V N a;.. o Ln CA O) O m m N O :CO O N N V M V N M N V N V V 0., (D M h m 00 V h 0 O) �. (O M W h N M V O Ln (D Lr N V N (D h h N N V M LO V N N h O M V M w V OD Ln V h 6) M W N N V Cn O co M V ©..(n (D V (D (n (0 M N_ U U m � N fn N N in N .N EEEEE o _0 0 n U (n w N w a) ._ 0U U U U Z .(D .2 2j n nin ninDcn @ CO 7 � C C C C C E C L C E E E E E 0 E o E 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 V E U U U U U S U E U 2` L L Q J C o 0 �����d'❑lnH h M 0) O) h((On (CM"7)k LO 0(rF01 N4N 4(n) .GtMti- . qM.M 'M "O)O ..O h (40} rr*h 0 4 O 0 r4 hN h M fS"O MOnO T.O n r (T) 4 N OJ !h N. (0 0 W (0 M cY, (T# (i}.0 r Ci v M M N v N N LO '£1' r N LO r V' N M M Ln V O M to of N o V V O V N@ N M Ln V h O N (O N (D V (0 N M O W N W w 0 (n O M 6) CO O (O h (fl h O V N co M M M co N N (D M (n N M a0 M M M r N Cl) N, Kam) 0 40,00 @ 4 0 (D M 0 M h Ow (n cr m r ao"eo cO m �r r4 N:N a.(C�"4l� <'! .- M M 'IT *- N N M M iV) :- 0 N N N v M h O) co V@ O O Ln O W@ O V c0 m h M V V Ln h O) OO h O) h 0 O N O M M O h r h N (O r V V Cl) M M N (V M M I-r r r N V Cl) Cl) (fl V r N LO c) M() @ M :,2O m O W 0 V O@@ (n h CO N m mV N N O W O w(D @ 0 N h h m mV r- LD M h N O) (O M r N N r W M (n h (A (A M r r O M r N r-u)Ln O LO o0 M M h N N M 0 r-O V (O LO O w LO (O LO mLn M u")Ln N r N Cn Cn M V N V N V (� Cn (D O N M Ln M 0 N V h Ln (n r- M V W c0 h 0 0 co O V h Gn It M O O h O I- In V r � 'ITm Ln O N r- 'ITr- co r- r r- h co V In (O co N N-- M N N N (D (n LD r- h r N M (D L) h (O co Ln w N M h h M N O r wr M wM (n M O (n N (n (O r- 00 w -;Iw M V M u) I'- u') Ln r N u)u)O) V O O N V M O N Ln h V r O) O M O n O N M N V M CO V O M N O N r O) h (n O O cD r N 0 Ln O N r N r r r N r M r W CD r r N r r In (r r r r h o0 r r r r M m N N N r O O m M O O (n V O O co O V h O N 42 m m m(fl (O r r'O m O wh h M Ln M V m O m M V co V m M O O N Cl) O co c0 (O CDLn LO 00 0 co co ITr O N LO r- mr-- OJ (O h (D m(O r M o7 N m h Cl) V h (fl h M V 6) V M m N O M N"T N -t N � LO CO co N N (O r 7 N (M M Cl) M N co co Ln cc N N N-t LO N N M M r W O) r N o o O h V O) Lo (M (n 00 O O @ V (n M M N h r (O N h h 0 N M O O@ O W (0 co 0) N CO V O O M 0 0 m M (O r h O M I- 0) l!7 (n r h O N r r N N V r O Ln D7 M h M (n N M M N M M M r 0 h r r r r h � r r r co r r r O) CO � O V h V O V In 0 M T V O LO M � (O M M M CO @ V LO LD V O Ln M V M Ln N 0 r-M I-M CO V O) h O (0 M N M V N O V M r-M M V CD N I� M Ln Ln O Iq N N I O M W O M r N m of m 'ITh 0 O) M M LD r h M LO V cc 0 cc 00 Ln N (D O N mN M Ln (A M Ln N M co V N M S N Ln Ln (n CD O (D Ln o) 'ITN Ln M N N O N ('M O) (DM- - N O N h - N Ln - r - - - - r N r N V w O @ h (n V (D M h M (A OJ m M u) r (n M @ O Ln CO M (D h Om @ M Ln 00 0) M r M O O aD O) r 0 6l N N N M CO (O m O O (D M M r h O N V O@ r N h CD h oo V CO V 6) M M h M N@ O CO Ln M O V LO O to h V h (D LD M (n h V M m h O r (D r- r V (3 r O O) N M O M Lr v r- W M h (n (A h a Q) O V Ln CO N O) O) M Ln L() V M N O CD h M O M co M Ln N N N N co N Ln M N (h co V M h V N V M zr co h M M Ln M (D r r N r- r r r r -- r Ln r r- O) O M 00 a0 r M M O N V V (O (0 V O m (n m CO O M 00 a0 O h (D MIT N h M O O h N M O r 00 M N O 00 LN O] N N O O N N N ((D V ((O O co N co N d) � CO V LQ o V N V (D CO � cc cc O M M Ln O h O) O N V O O r It (O M O V r N O V M O O M V V M N N N M (O N N N N w N M M V (n In M h o V M O O) O M O N r r N h r (D r N LD U 7 N M V (n 0 0 0 0 O U w w w U w w w o d 000000000 LL o_O_oo(n0 0 Cl) V V N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O V 7 V V V V V V V V U E C c c C C C C L) t N NNNNNNL i Ykkk Ykk Yk - C C C C C C C N O _ `_ `_ `_ �_ `_ Y U S fn N M In N N N L to N N . Vl N (~/1 (~/1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to E 0 0 0 0 0 0E E E E E E E rj `o E @ @ @ @ @ @ @ r E 2 N v N rn w rn @ U U U U U U U N A T T T T T T T T (n (n Cn Cn (n U U @ @ @ @ @ @ @ xC @ @ @ @ @ @ @222222272 a)a@i=222x2x a) T T T T T T (@() a) a) a) a) a) a) a) O o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a cn > > > > > > > > r N M V (n (O h r N M V In M h O r ...... 0 0 0 r 006600000000666666 S S x S S S o 2 x x x o x x x x x o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O o N M M M MnM M O O o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln LOl!) Ln Ln Ln li) (!) LO LO (!') Ln u) 4') Ln 4') 4') C m m O N d r N co V Ln o.>.>.>.>.> d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c c c c c c a c -o E E E E E E c E j O O C C 7 a a a a a a @ 00 CO CO CO 00 CO mm0- 9 -N M V (n 0 0 0 333333 o Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V V V V V m Ln (n LO LO LO Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln LO U N co V (n N C C C C C O O O O O d E E 0 0 0 °2S r N M V Ln _ N N Lo N 2 L . C _ n N N y N O O O O O N❑❑❑❑❑ N 0❑❑❑❑ > > > > > `@ @ @ @ @ � @ @ N @ (0 0 00000 m a a d a d@ a a a a a Of U U U U U o6 °25 ot5 c2S d 0 0 0 0 0 a) u) y y y y O 0 0 00 o C 0 0 0 0 0 NE0000 - o"- >❑ C c C c C@ 0 N N N N@ N L1 N N N o ,o ,o 0 0 o ci aoi ao ao) ao o) aaaa o) o) a) o) ao t @ a) m m m m � � � � � �a� � x w x � U° (i U U (i U@@@@@@ a o o o o o m m m m m °) 2 2 2 o a a -a a -o c@ K K K Q Q Q Q E as as as as as @ a Q Q a Q T a> a o a o D o o N N N 0 Q` 7 7 7 7 U----- @ N U) a) a) a) N r N M V In r N M V (n r N M V 0 a d d d d a a a a a a d d a a a a a a CD K CD o 0 0 o LO� LO LO LO o 0 o 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n LO (n (n LO LO o 0 0 0 0 0 O M r r r r r M M M M M Ln CD 4) Ln (n Ln (n O Ln In Ln In In In In LO O Ln CD CD CD (D COM CD (D (D [O O CD O O O CD CD O CD O Ff a W a Wj Ln V m M N V co N IIt V M m M O LO LO V I-- M Z, LO W N Ln V N M N r N N (N O O O M (D LO V M V N N r N 0 u V N Io 0 M N r M O O �. W O V LO W 1� W m M r V O (n O M V 0 (D r' W (D r W V co co N M QtoU❑ W 0 0 0 0 0 .N N .n .n ,N .N 522.22 0 0000 U U U 5 U C N N U) U) V! U) U) 0 0 C6 m @ y6 C @ @ @ @ @ U) >, > T T T N T @ N @ N @ > r N M V (O O o r a¢a¢¢aa wwCl) (n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M M m m m M u� Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln . 04 LO W, M W 00 ;, (0�1 h LNn M h, .' q3 MW Lfi '0�, , N ap (05 N d3 N 45 (00 W 407 .; W 3 N iMiS N 006 06 £7' (S3 (0S, h 00 N «t Lo ;r.orrr�m-ter DMd m044r,LOu>cn LON s ux(DNu o u� Ni N s �r C cs rti m r o.. -, c r; M r cx ax cmr-ciC - "r=Vi ou7 4s�0.uYO.t, r ras ro ter, c co m Nco000co, "u cs rsa0 ui Lo r r to q5 OD M 'Ir V M TM- M M M m W CO N r r N N LD N M 00 r m m M I- V 0 r O'IT O 0 N V N c)r Ln co V co V I� LO m N LO LD 0 W I� N M r M O LD LO W N W m W c)0 O m O r W r 0 m W M r LO N N W W N I` m m r r N LO LO V M co W Ln W r W 0 r- I� LO 0 M LO V I- (O U) r r r (D r r r r I� M V M M r N W M N N W r r N N N r N Cl) O 0 W m m 0 N M W I- I- I` (O r- m Ln O m V M (O O m M W LO O IT W 00 r co Ln W V W I'- m 0 I- N () M M m M M m M I� m 0 I� M V W I� m N" M r LO NI-- c)W 'It CO N I- r W V r r M N LO Lo W N M I-- r- LO LO Il- 1-r m W I� (o 'IT M W I� O W oo r I� W LO M m (D N M N r m r M N O W W of I� N I-- r Ln M I� N co r V LO V O O N 0 r N r N N N r N M I- r V V M O_ M M W W V M M M V (D r r r M 0 N N r r r O O M I� m r O O W V N W (O W (D Ln m 0 I: V W V O N W N r r 0 0 W O co O (D O r W LO m N O O V M O V M 0 r I- M Ln M W M IQ LO W N M 0 V (D V W r 0 (o V M V V N N O W W O N M Ln 0 0 r W r- r V M r M M m r r r N r r W Ln co Ln (O V r r N N W I� N O N V L I- W CD N W (D co V M M CD r M M IT CD M O r r r m W LO V W In W O O m LO LO r- v m m r m 0 LO M N N M N r-q N -It CD -ITN N r 0 LO V 'IT N co r r W m y I- V m M CD W C,r W W CDV 7 r r (O r r r r co- W M't't m r r co r.1m C I- r N N N r N M r LOrr r r M W W M Cl) r- V N r O O V I-- ('M r Nt N M I� O N M N O W O N N M 0 0 0 W r I� O LO O I- LO M LO M V V I- r M N O N M Nr LO V W M V M V V W 0— r D W (O a0 N r N r r r r O W W M O m 0 L) (O (0 V I- O N N r N LO r r r LO N N M M N M r r m M 0 (D O LD O m N I- V I- c00 O O Ln r V N O N W N N (�O N (0 w 0 V LO LO V N N O Ln W V r- u N (D O W N M M M V M V m V W (D V I-- V 0 0 1- (M 'T W N r r r r M M CO eD W N M o0 r M I-- r (0 m M r N V (D r- m M V V M N r W M M V LO I- N V CO 00 (D It V C)O I- Ln M r- 0 I- M M 0 LO LO V r W N N r- O r M 0 0 0 W V (D CO M (D Ln O N r Ln O N W N M r N co V N I- M N 0 r- N r- W N I'- M 0 M N N N O N LO LO N (O (O m r M M r Ln r 0 0 M r Lo (-0M oD W V W CO m (D (D 0 I- 'IT (D N M LO V Cl) m m N M V M 00 r LO LO N (D N r- M 0 0 LO W N CD C) V V (D CDr m r r N r r M N V LO V W I- N m W v m r r r M N V 1� 0 0 0 1� c m v (D LO W O N N M N r r V N M N M r M r N r- r (p m m W M m M V I- M O O V r- (O n O r m (D N N I- v m o m V V M N r M I- W W W V m V N V N I- (` r oo I� r I� m N M 0 (D O N 0 m N N CD co m M V m n m (o It r- M W W -ITr M ITN (D co M I- ti m r- (O LO 0 V r C CD I� n W W N M M r I� O M W N M W W I- m LO (O 0 LO 0 LO W N I� r CD Ln W O CO m CO r r W m V (D W O m (0 m V I� W M Ln Lo M V I- m n LO n O W----- r O (D O V W N W 0 LO V LO 0 M N N N N W r r r r r W M M M M V N N 01 J m m � O O @a a C r N M V O .C c c C C N o (q D 0 D 0 > 'Ul .N .N .N ST ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ T T T T T T U U U U U r N M V Ln U C C C C C 00,0.00o80) S, .0Fn N'N Q Q L Q Q Q Q 00000������ 0 m a a u a aCL Q Q Q Q Q Q 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 O 'C c 'c 'C c C 0 0 0 0 O O, 2 2 rn 2 -Cut: 2100000 OU U' ( (D (D N@ N N N N C@@@@@ o❑❑❑❑❑w(n(n(ncncn r N M V LO r N M V LO or r r r r O r. r r r a¢aa¢a¢aa¢a¢ O O O O O O O o o O o 0 O O O O O O r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W Q E � O ' E d O O O D_ ti L r (N m V LO r m a a r N M V Ln N > > > > > U 0 Cl) > > a00o00�❑No.>a00 Cl 0 v c ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ > Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ U o o T v o v 5 5 5 0 0 U y y y n n � � m N N N N ❑ a @ (6 (6 (6 E r--O c .0 c c c @ U > T N N @ »»> E o �.L' 0 > M m m L N L U U U U U O o 0 o o o 0 o c> >_ Q .@ @ C Q@ O O O O O E O N f6 U U @ @ o U U U U U C 0}} K UU U2�2 D_D_� } r N M V LO r N M V LO M Ln c) (::> c,r r 0 0 0 0 r r 0 0 0 r O r U C,mn�)m 30: m�moNNNNNNo ocD��� O O LO (n LO LO (O CD O LO O N N N N N N O Ln O O LO LO LO O O O LO O O O O r N M CO CO CO CO CO CO V Lo LO LO LO LO LO N 4') m m Lo Ln m 4 LO oo Ln m m l m m m oo LO LO LO 4 4') m W W W W W W W W W W co W W W W W W W W W W W W W Q1 @ m 0 N Cl) V LO @ O r 0 C O O O O O O r N M V LO 'N .N N Mn .N Mn O > > > > >> > a 0 0 0 0 0 0 N y N Ul Z N V U U U U U Q Q Q p Q p Ln ❑ p @ @ O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ cC j C N > > > > > @ E L c c c c N N N N N 0E@ N N� �7 � �7 � o 0 0 0 0 0= N p m m N N fn @@@@@ A N N fn N N Y o Li W W W W W w W W W W W J J r N M V Ln r N M V Ln O r r O r r 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Lo O OLo . r r r Lo Lo r N N 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 a a 00 a3 CD a 00 N N N 0 ,gJ,pN) d N 0'OV0 W h 00'a cMu,N N 05 c4 (}) N (O N hN++ 0 03,. u) (ri §r" (6 of 05' 06 c o -:oDo�oe> sy a C6- m M M co W V LO r- OD O O 00 N O O) m (0 M OD OD r Od) U)N IV- V O0 W r M m N 04 N V I-- r- r V I— V I- M M O V V [O N N U) N U) (0 V 0) M I— r M V M co Z' N r N r O U) OD r r M M M r OD OD O V N O r N N N N N N V V LL,, M U) O M r C) r V Or-- O O O (0 OD W CL co U) V Cl) M I— 'ITU) M (O U) U) U) U) V LO M N U) U) r M V r Cl) O 0) I-- O M O O M M CO (O 47 I— V N U (0 ] OD O J: (orn0(nrnr M O (O (O r Z.,... I` CO r I— N O N r (O 00 0) r r M N N N N r (p Cl) co Cl)N N N M M Q„,.. N N M M (0 U) r M M V M M r r (D (0 (O I— N M r (0 0) O (O V O Q N N N Cl) U) N I—, V V (0 U) M N N 10 10 W M M U) M M V N (O (O N O N (V V U) (0 V V V M (O U) r O W �,.. V (OD D r V� 00 N N N '. N r r N O N CO 00 r CO I: N M V co co V co M M r r- V OD OD (3) U) V r 00 V N 0) - N V N I- O r V M f� U) U) O Il_ O 0) 0) r V o0 U) I1 r r U) r V V 0 0 r r r O r 0) U) 0) d) V V M V M N U) r r O O � m m aCOCo ❑ N V N v)❑❑ ° O CD : O O C C C C W N@ ILO_ _O _O O_ N p p O N M V (O r co V) N U) C C C C C C >>>> O p O O O O . O > CL ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ co Q Q O- UU 5 m m m m m m Y ❑_ ❑ ❑ m m m m U C .0 .0 .CN y O 7 7 3 3 i (6 O_ OQ O_ OQ o- O O O' 'U (6 O V d U U U U N N N M N N N N C L E C C C C C U) N N (O 2 2 2 2 O M m C 0 N N N N ❑ m i N N N N co N (N >N >N >N >N CO U) N O C i J J J J a O i M M V u) r M V U) N N N O O 22 L1..� V O Q >> >> O CD CD O M O O O O O C.O C.M Cl) d' N N N N N co M M V V V V V V r (N N C M M O O M M M M O)M M O) m rn 00 ❑ a a BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 ( Jty af �La Qt.drita C 11,.,.Y COUNCIL CY IE 1F1F II : June 7, 2 0 2 2 1,.,AFT I .IE IP IN I,.,, AGEIKDA 1""'1'TIIIIE: RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT, PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 9212, ASSESSING THE FISCAL, ECONOMIC, AND RELATED IMPACTS OF THE INITIATIVE MEASURE ENTITLED "PHASE -OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON -HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA," BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 RJlli,°!u C IIII li' IE II ID 1""'10N Receive and file report, prepared pursuant to California Elections Code section 9212, assessing the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the initiative measure entitled "Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta," by December 31, 2024. E EC VU'T' E SQKMAIRY • A Notice of Intention to circulate an initiative petition proposing the "'Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas in the City of La Quinta" (Initiative), by December 31, 2024, was filed with the City on January 12, 2022. • On March 15, 2022, as authorized and pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, the Council ordered a report to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative. • On May 24, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official received the economic report, included as Attachment 1. F" 1SC L 'I; lip IP C"I" - None. IB lid IR. IN ID IN IYS" 1 S On January 12, 2022, a Notice of Intention to circulate the Initiative was filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official pursuant to Elections Code section 9202. 229 On March 15, 2022, as authorized and pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, the Council ordered a report to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative. Staff contacted five (5) firms - Pannel Kerr Forster in Houston, TX, TXP Economic and Public Consulting in Austin, TX (TXP), Development Management Group in Palm Desert, CA, Dan Runyan Associates in Portland, OR, and Tourism Economics in Wayne, PA. TXP was selected to prepare the economic report. On May 24, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official received the report, entitled "The 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA," included as Attachment 1, which notes that in 2020, La Quinta accounted for approximately 17% of the total STVR direct regional lodging spending. The report further analyzed 2021 STVR data across La Quinta and its economic impacts on the local economy, and outlines several key points, including: • The vast majority of local STVR activity in La Quinta supports Group travel, i.e., families and friends. • Studios and one -bedroom STVR accommodations, are excluded from the analysis, assuming this type of lodging can be accommodated by hotels; (one -bedroom lodging in La Quinta accounted for 12.2% of available room -nights, and only 5% of the total local STVR lodging revenue during 2021). • The report takes into account that approximately 62% of the owners of permitted STVRs in La Quinta reside out of the area. For out of town owners, about 20% of total lodging revenue remains in the area to pay for management and maintenance. As a result, the total net impact of lodging revenue is reduced by about half. • In addition to lodging spending, visitors who stay in STVRs also spend money on food and beverage, entertainment, shopping, local transportation, etc. Taken together with lodging, this direct spending injected $145.5 million into the local economy in 2021. • The direct spending above translates into a total economic impact (including ripple effects) of $203.8 million in annual spending, and just under 1,300 full-time, permanent jobs, of which up to 80% is subject to be lost due to the proposed STVR ban. 230 • Assuming 2021 travel activities remained constant, the annual tax revenues would be reduced by $6.1 million: o STVRs in permit ban areas account for approximately 80% of the $5.9 million transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues collected by the City in 2021. Since STVRs in exempt areas would remain (or 20% of STVRs), the net annual TOT loss is estimated to be $4.7 million. o Local sales tax economic impacts are estimated at $28.8 million in Retail Trade and $42 million in food services, for a total of $70.8 million; assuming Measure G applies to all activity, the total impact is approximately $1.4 million in annual sales tax revenue loss. IILTIIE IR Ili wI , i E S As Council ordered this report, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. The 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA prepared by TXP Economics. 231 232 ATTACHMENT 1 T IIIIIIIIIIII",,canoi rlii c n011lf l e nlll hill" LcilCA Prepared for by D TXP, Inc. Austin, Texas (512) 328-8300 www.txp.com 233 Stir rnffIIII"" The popularity of short-term vacation rentals (STRs) has surged in almost all communities in the United States, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. STRs expand the lodging options available to travelers, allowing greater consumer choice as to the range and nature of travel accommodations. However, this growth has not come without concerns, as many in residential neighborhoods view STRs as an inappropriate commercial activity in parts of the community reserved for non-commercial uses. In order to inform this overall discussion, TXP has been tasked with evaluating the economic impact of STRs on La Quinta. The 2021 economic impact of STRs in La Quinta was calculated as follows. First, aggregate direct accommodations spending of visitors using STRs with at least two bedrooms totaled $116.2 million last year.' Next, this figure was used to calculate STR guest spending on other tourism purchases, such as entertainment and food. The result was total direct spending attributable to STRs of $203.2 million. However, much of the lodging revenue paid flows to STR operators who live outside the area. Using data on STR registration from the City, local STR lodging revenue is reduced by about half, to $58.5 million, putting the total net injection last year at $145.5 million. This injection by STR guests in La Quinta yielded a total impact in Riverside County of $203.8 million in economic activity, value-added of $126.3 million, $47.0 million in annual earnings, 1,271 full-time, permanent jobs, and about $6.1 million in annual City tax revenue. Direct Annual Activity Economic Impact STRs bring economic and fiscal benefits to La Quinta that will be lost, at least to some degree, if they are substantially reduced. By limiting legal STR operations to restricted areas some of the benefits will be retained. However, the economic impact of the transition to this narrower allowable zone of activity will be significant. Typically, bans do not eliminate unwanted STR activity, but removal of oversight and tax collection means they do eliminate most of the benefit to local taxpayers while increasing municipal costs. These unintended consequences, as well as the potential losses, should be carefully considered. 'Data was provided byAllTheRooms. Note:2+ bedrooms is used as a means of controlling for those who might easily come and stay in a hotel if STRs were not available. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 234 The popularity of short-term vacation rentals (STRs) has surged in almost all communities in the United States, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. STRs expand the lodging options available to travelers, allowing greater consumer choice as to the range and nature of travel accommodations. However, this growth has not come without concerns, as many in residential neighborhoods view STRs as an inappropriate commercial activity in parts of the community reserved for non-commercial uses. This certainly appears to be the case in La Quinta, CA, where a group has organized to propose a ballot initiative to eliminate STRs from residential neighborhoods in the city. Entitled "Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta," the petition is the culmination of years of evolving local STR regulations attempting to address resident concerns (typically related to noise, trash, parking, and density) while accommodating the tourist activity and associated economic and local tax revenue impacts that come with STR visitors. In order to inform this overall discussion, TXP has been tasked with evaluating the economic impact of STRs on La Quinta. As context, a brief overview of regional tourism is provided, including data on overall tourism trends. The analysis then estimates the direct injection into the local economy from visitors who stay in STRs using information on local STR spending combined with local research on additional direct tourist spending. This information is then used as inputs into the RIMS II input-output model of the Riverside County economy maintained by the Us Bureau of Economic Analysis (a division of the Census Bureau) to estimate the secondary economic impacts.2 TXP then estimates the local tax revenue impacts, using the direct spending and economic impact results as the base, and concludes the report with the overall findings. IIIIa Q„ liii iiu vta STTowrisiiu"Tiii ointext The travel and tourism industry is a foundational element of the Coachella Valley economy, as visitors spend billions annually in the region. While the COVID-19 pandemic obviously hampered travel to the area the impact remains significant. According to a study done by Tourism Economics for Visit Palm Springs: An estimated 8.6 million visitors spent $3.6 billion in the Coachella Valley in Calendar Year (CY) 2020. This direct spending generated total gross output (business sales) of $4.5 billion, more than 33,000 jobs, $1.1 billion in income earned in the region, and $428 million in state and local tax revenues. 2 See https://apps.bea.gov/regional/rims/rimsii/ 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 235 Tourism Economics has also examined the specific regional impact of STRs in the same period. According to a separate study done for the same client: A significant share of visitors to the Coachella Valley stay in short-term vacation rentals (STVRs), and their spending drives local jobs and income. Just under 1.0 million visitors staying in STVR accommodations accounted for 12% of total volume, and their $564 million in spending accounted for 16% of total visitor spending in the region in (CY) 2020. An estimated $22.1 million in Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) driven by STVRs accounted for 28.6% of total TOT in the region. This study addresses the impact of STRs by moving the analysis forward to 2021 and narrowing the scope to STRs that are located in the City of La Quinta. In addition, the analysis is limited to STRs that offer at least two bedrooms on property.3 One issue that often arises in considering the impact of STRs is the question of substitution: if STRs were not available, would travelers simply choose to stay in hotels instead? It could be argued that hotel lodging serves the same market as studios and one -bedrooms, but two or more bedrooms is clearly focused on group travel, which is not as easily accommodated with traditional lodging options. Tii°vii'iids lii ui°i the Illl oftiii'ig Sector Money to spend and a desire to spend it have driven the resurgence of travel and tourism in the Greater Palm Springs area post -pandemic. As the impact of COVID-19 has receded, overall hotel occupancy has returned to close to pre -pandemic levels. Meanwhile, lodging revenue is surging, driven by a combination of demand (including capacity to pay) and inflation. Most other financial measures track the trend in total lodging revenue, as revenue per available room (RevPAR) and the average daily rate were above pre -pandemic levels in February. On the workforce side, the local accommodation job base has yet to fully recover, though there likely are other factors (such as declining labor force participation) at work. The impact of the pandemic obviously was severe, but recent indicators suggest that local travel activity (at least as of February 2022) was largely back to pre -pandemic levels. 3 Note: The proposed permit ban area does not include any meaningful number of studio/one-bedroom units. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 236 Figures in this Section are Based on Data from the Month of February Each Year Hotel data does not include STRs Figure 1 Hotel Occupancy in Greater Palm Springs Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc. Figure 2 Total Monthly Hotel Lodging Revenue ($Millions) e�,)I 8� 2C,�';� d�4,l,I/i 11 oA 102, V. Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 1 237 Figure 3 Hotel Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) I f, 201''l 1111")Ull 2YO19 Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc. Figure 4 Hotel Average Daily Rate (ADR) `020 2 1 2022 Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 238 Shur Tel"rri Ftelu°Aaa II hIIII a Qtiha As previously indicated, vacation rental properties have been part of the accommodations market for decades in some of California's most popular tourism destinations, including La Quinta. When evaluating the economic impact, the focus should be on net new activity — in other words, activity that would not otherwise occur in La Quinta/Riverside County absent STRs. As discussed above, narrowing the analysis to how much was spent overall by visitors who stay in STRs that offer at least two bedrooms on property advances this goal and is a reasonable proxy; while it is true that some intended to visit and stay in a property that offered 2+ bedrooms would come anyway if that option were not available, it is also true that some visitors who came and stayed in a studio/one-bedroom STR would not have chosen another lodging option absent STR availability. Table 1: Direct STR 2-Bedroom+ Visitor Indicators in La Quinta Sources: AIITheRooms (https://www.alltherooms.com/analytics); TXP, Inc. Note: "Room -nights" in this context refers to the number of bedrooms available, eg, a 3-bedroom property would have 3 room -nights available for a given date. Ecc)noniiic Illii'mil) ::°f C" icsulllatiiioills The 2021 economic impact of STRs in La Quinta was calculated as follows. First, aggregate direct accommodations spending of visitors using STRs with at least two bedrooms totaled $116.2 million being spent last year.4 Next, this spending figure was used as the basis of calculating the STR guest spending on other tourism purchase categories, such as entertainment and food.' In other words, for every dollar spent on lodging at an STR, a traveler might spend a slightly greater aggregate amount on food and beverage. The result was total direct spending attributable to STRs of $203.2 million last year. All visitor STR lodging spending does not enter the local economy, as the City of La Quinta reports that 62 percent of the permitted STRs in the community are registered to those who live outside the area. Given this, the assumption is that only the remaining 38 percent (reflecting local ownership) remains in the local economy. "Data was provided byAllTheRooms. 'TXP typically uses data from the Tourism Satellite Accounts produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis as the basis of this ancillary direct spending estimate. However, Tourism Economics published 2020 estimates of STR related ancillary spending in the local market, which reflects, at least in part, local primary research. These ratios likely are more attuned to the situation locally and are consistent with findings elsewhere. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 239 However, even those operators who reside outside the area must service and maintain the property, which is assumed to cost the equivalent of 20 percent of total lodging revenue (to cover costs such as property management, repairs, compliance/overhead, and capital improvements). The net impact is that the $116.2 million lodging figure is reduced by about half ($57.7 million), to $58.5 million, putting the total direct injection into the local economy at $145.5 million ($203.2 million minus $57.7 million). Figure 5: 2021 Estimated Direct STR Visitor Spending by Category ($millions) Colored pie slices represent local direct STIR -related spending: $145.5 million total iw ("VolI61t "Gnillw [)['r it �N AP F k"0oa A PN a , cAY wn: Source: Tourism Economics, DK Shiflett, TXP, Inc. To put these figures in context, AIITheRooms reports La Quinta STIR direct spending of $95.1 million during 2020 (including studios/one-bedrooms). Tourism Economics reported total STIR visitor spending in the region that same year of $564 million, meaning La Quinta accounts for just under 17 percent of the regional total. This direct spending was used to estimate the ripple effects, i.e., the induced and indirect impacts, with the total economic impact the combination of all three. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 240 I X x:: cn.niic lii,npaict IIMethodology The second step in the process is to translate the direct impact into the total economic impact through an input-output model of the Riverside County economy that allows measurement of the secondary, or "ripple" effects. Economists use a number of statistics to describe regional economic activity. Four common measures are: • Output (also known as Economic Activity and equivalent to top -line revenue), which describes total economic activity and is equivalent to a firm's gross sales or top -line; • Value Added which equals gross output of an industry or a sector less its intermediate inputs or purchases from other firms used in the production process; • Labor Income which corresponds to wages and benefits; and • Employment which refers to jobs that have been created in the local economy. The economic impacts extend beyond the direct activity outlined above. In an input- output analysis of new economic activity, it is useful to distinguish three types of expenditure effects: direct, indirect, and induced. • Direct effects are production changes associated with the immediate effects or final demand changes. The payments made by a visitor to a STIR operator or taxi driver are examples of a direct effect. • Indirect effects are production changes in backward -linked industries caused by the changing input needs of directly affected industries — typically, additional purchases to produce additional output. Satisfying the demand for an overnight stay will require the STR operator to purchase additional cleaning supplies and services, for example, and the taxi driver will have to replace the gasoline consumed during the trip from the airport. These downstream purchases affect the economic status of other local merchants and workers. • Induced effects are the changes in regional household spending patterns caused by changes in household income generated from the direct and indirect effects. Both the STIR operator and taxi driver experience increased income from the visitor's stay, for example, as do the cleaning supplies outlet and the gas station proprietor. Induced effects capture the way in which this increased income is spent in the local economy. Figure 8: The Flow of Economic Impacts ui IIIUIIIUJ��JII;iilmIIu�9��J1J111J��)))JJJJJJ�)J��IrJJ,»ui� uuIIIIII1111111��11111i1uuffff11111�IIIff�i11�J��i�11��1iiiJi�i? uuuuu i�i"�i Ill lu��lufff�uiilluff�ul�llu�ffffl�ufiu(fllulu�fluu(��(��(��(��(��(��(��(��� IIII%iiiiiluffllu���lufffluu�l��fffl�uullulllluulllllulu��(loluilu�����������������'' """""� 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 241 I Xx::cc::°°niic Illiinp ict IIIf(:sii,jI[fc The direct spending by STIR guests in La Quinta during 2021 yielded a total impact in Riverside County of $203.8 million in economic activity, value-added of just over $126 million, $47.0 million in annual earnings, and about 1,271 full-time, permanent jobs. It should be noted that these results are reported by county since visitors who come to stay at a STIR in La Quinta likely will spend money elsewhere in the region; by the same token, some workers employed at La Quinta-based establishments may live in other local communities. However, most non -accommodation spending usually occurs near where visitors are staying, which suggests largely within the city limits of La Quinta. The table that follows details the total impacts detailed by industry sector. As would be expected, the lion's share of the activity tends to be found in consumer -driven segments of the economy such as food services, retail trade, and arts & entertainment. Of note is the fact that applicable direct STIR lodging spending is allocated to the property management/real estate sector, rather than the accommodations sector, since revenue flows to private homeowners. Figure 9: Total 2021 La Quinta STIR Economic Impact ($millions) Agriculture, etc. $0.4 $0.2 $0.1 2 Mining NA NA NA NA Utilities $4.0 $2.3 $0.4 2 Construction $3.3 $1.6 $0.9 12 Durable Manufacturing $2.5 $1.0 $0.4 6 Non -Durable Manufacturing $4.5 $1.4 $0.5 9 Wholesale Trade $4.5 $2.8 $0.8 9 Retail Trade $28.8 $16.6 $7.4 203 Transportation & Warehousing $6.3 $2.7 $1.5 50 Information $2.6 $1.4 $0.4 4 Finance & Insurance $3.2 $2.0 $0.7 7 Real Estate $59.1 $40.9 $7.1 191 Professional Services $3.3 $2.4 $1.3 16 Management of Firms $1.1 $0.7 $0.2 2 Administrative & Waste Services $10.2 $13.7 $7.6 153 Educational Services $1.0 $0.7 $0.4 9 Health Services $6.3 $4.1 $2.2 39 Arts/Entertainment/Recreation $16.0 $8.6 $4.3 140 Accommodation $1.0 $0.7 $0.3 6 Food Services $42.0 $20.4 $9.7 385 Other Services $3.6 $2.1 $1.0 21 Households NA NA NA 3 Source: TXP, Inc. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 242 Tax 1teveuinw Impact Further benefits accrue to state and local governments in the form of taxes assessed on direct spending by STR guests, as well as revenues generated by the ripple effects of that spending. Tourism tends to generate a high proportion of tax revenue compared to other industries. Most goods and services purchased by visitors are taxed, and many at a higher rate than other goods. There are three main areas where the City of La Quinta realizes tax revenue from STR activity: property taxes, lodging taxes, and sales taxes. Taxes on real property will be assessed independent (at least in the short-term) of usage, meaning the owner of a home will have to pay property taxes whether it is being occupied as a residence or used as an STR. In a time of historically low interest rates and limited housing supply, there is no indication that homes being used as STRs appraise at a higher level for tax purposes than comparable properties that are occupied as residences. This situation could change as interest rates rise and supply increases (which combined would tend to lower residential property values) but the conservative approach is to ascribe no new net property tax revenue to STRs. The City of La Quinta reports Transient Occupancy Tax related to STRs for 2021 at $5.9 million, which, at a ten percent tax rate, implies STR lodging revenue of about $59 million. This is the current total TOT collected. However, the City reports units in areas that fall under the proposed ban represent 80 percent of current revenue. The assumption, therefore, is that 20 percent would remain, putting the net annual TOT loss $4.7 million. Local sales tax is assessed at one percent on most transactions involving tangible goods (with exceptions made for items such as groceries for home consumption) and most services untaxed, with Measure G adding an additional one percent The economic impact results show top -line revenue (output) impacts of $28.8 million in Retail Trade and $42.0 million in Food Services, for a total of $70.8 million. Assuming the local sales tax rate applies to all of that activity, the impact is just over $1.4 million in annual sales tax revenue, putting the total potential annual loss at $6.1 million. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 243 QrxlusIII ' i is STRs have been an important (and, as measured by dollars, growing) part of La Quinta's tourism industry, especially given its role as a smaller market that caters to leisure travelers. Group travel is a significant component of the broader leisure category and comprises the vast majority of local STIR activity in La Quinta, as studio/one-bedroom STRs accounted for only 12.2 percent of the room -nights and 5.0 percent of the total local STIR lodging revenue during 2021. As this data indicates, STRs in La Quinta serve a specific market - the casual leisure group traveler. This traveler typically is interested in lodging options not fully satisfied by more traditional choices, a point especially emphasized during the pandemic. As a result, a region's overall travel and tourism industry activity, and the resulting local economic impact, today more than ever is increased by including STRs in the available lodging options. That having been said, benefits are maximized by appropriately addressing concerns. Tourism Economics put it well in their study of regional STRs: By monitoring the visitor economy and STIR segment of the market, local policymakers can inform decisions regarding the funding and prioritization of the sector's development and also craft balanced and effective local regulations. They can also carefully monitor its successes and future needs. This is true for municipalities in the Coachella Valley, as the visitor economy has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and as STRs are increasingly utilized by visitors to the region. In sum, STRs bring economic and fiscal benefits to La Quinta that will be lost, at least to some degree, if they are substantially reduced. By limiting legal STIR operations to restricted areas such as those proposed in the petition some of the benefits will be retained. However, the economic impact of the transition to this narrower allowable zone of activity will be significant, at least until new product can be brought to market to replace what has been removed via the regulatory ban. Moreover, bans typically do not eliminate unwanted STIR activity, but removal of oversight and tax collection means they do eliminate most of the benefit to local taxpayers while increasing municipal costs. These unintended consequences, as well as the potential losses, should be carefully considered. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 244 IIII ''iiii 5 llll iiu iiu TXP reserves the right to make changes, corrections and/or improvements at any time and without notice. In addition, TXP disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of errors, omissions, or discrepancies. TXP disclaims any liability due to errors, omissions or discrepancies made by third parties whose material TXP relied on in good faith to produce the report. Any statements involving matters of opinion or estimates, whether or not so expressly stated, are set forth as such and not as representations of fact, and no representation is made that such opinions or estimates will be realized. The information and expressions of opinion contained herein are subject to change without notice, and shall not, under any circumstances, create any implications that there has been no change or updates. 2021 Economic Impact of Short -Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA I Spring 2022 245 246 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 City t i a a C11-Y COUNCIL UI CII II IEIEl"INGJune 7, 2022 , IIEIINID " 'T'riI""ILIE:� ADOPT RESOLUTIONS: (A) ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE PROPOSING THE "'PHASE -OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON -HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA," BY DECEMBER 31, 20241 AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (B) SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF THE SAM E (C) REQUESTING RIVERSIDE COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE THE ELECTION FOR THE INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE WITH THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION AND STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 RECQM1%EINDA­rxaN A. Adopt a resolution ordering the submission to the qualified electors of the City an initiative ordinance and corresponding ballot measure proposing the "Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta," by December 31, 2024, at the General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022. B. Adopt a resolution setting priority for filing written arguments and providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments regarding the initiative ordinance and corresponding ballot measure; and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis for the same. C. Adopt a resolution requesting that the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County consolidate the election for this initiative ordinance and corresponding ballot measure with the General Municipal Election and Statewide General Election, to be held on November 8, 2022. 247 EXECL11,1 E S1YM14XRY • A Notice of Intention to circulate an initiative petition proposing the "Phase - Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non - Exempt Areas in the City of La Quinta" (Initiative), by December 31, 2024, was filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official on January 12, 2022. • On March 15, 20221 as authorized and pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, the Council ordered a report to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative. • On April 21, 2022, the proponents filed petitions regarding the Initiative, which were submitted to the Riverside County Registrar of Voters (ROV) for full signature verification on April 26, 2022. • On May 3, 2022, Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2022-009 and 2022-010 calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the election of certain officers and requesting the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County (BOS) to consolidate this election with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date. • On May 24, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official received the final report ordered pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, scheduled for Council's consideration on June 7, 2022. • On June 3, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official received the results of the signature verification conducted by the ROV, which established that a sufficient number of signatures were verified to qualify the Initiative to be placed on the ballot, and the ROV prepared a Certificate of Sufficiency of the Initiative scheduled for Council's consideration on June 7, 2022. • Proposed are resolutions to (A) submit to the City's qualified electors the Initiative at the next General Municipal Election, to be held on November 8, 2022; (B) set priorities for filing written arguments and rebuttal arguments, and direct the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis regarding the Initiative; and (C) request the BOS consolidate the Initiative election with the General Municipal Election and Statewide General Election, to be held on November 8, 2022. F"1SC L UWPAC1 Funds for consolidated election services for this Initiative with the ROV for the November 8, 2022, election, of $40,000 will be budgeted in City Clerk Professional MR Services Account No. 101-1005-60103 for fiscal year 2022/23. Variables affecting the final amount include the number of jurisdictions that participate, the final number of registered voters receiving pamphlets, the number of measures added to the pamphlet, providing vote -by -mail ballots to all registered voters, and increases to postage, paper, gas, vendor, and staff costs. CI . SIR UII IIII3 N II,,YS'I On January 12, 2022, a Notice of Intention to circulate the Initiative was filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official pursuant to Elections Code section 9202. On January 27, 2022, the City Attorney prepared an official ballot title and summary for the Initiative for use by the proponents for publication and circulation of a petition, which was provided to the proponents by the City Clerk/Elections Official on the same day, in accordance with Elections Code section 9203. On February 2, 2022, the proponents filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official the publication affidavit as required by Elections Code section 9206 and began circulating the petition. On February 2, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official contacted the ROV and determined the number of registered voters in the City of La Quinta was 24,487; and as of the ROV's last report to the Secretary of State (SoS) pursuant to Elections Code section 21871 dated January 13, 2022, and in effect on February 2, 20221 the number of registered voters in the City of La Quinta was 24,392. The Initiative petition must be signed by not less than 10% of the registered voters in the City in order to qualify for the ballot (Elections Code section 9215). On April 21, 2022, the proponents filed the petition with the City Clerk/Elections Official pursuant to Elections Code section 9210, which was submitted to the ROV on April 26, 2022, for full signature verification (Elections Code section 9211). The results of the signature verification conducted by the ROV established that all of the 3,667 signatures submitted on the petition were examined, of which 3,244 were found to be sufficient, which is in excess of the minimum number of signatures required to qualify the Initiative to be placed on the ballot at a regular election pursuant to Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405; and on June 3, 2022, the ROV issued the Certificate of Sufficiency. In accordance with Elections Code sections 9211 and 9114, if the petition is found sufficient, the City Clerk/Elections Official shall certify the results of the examination to the City Council at the next regular meeting, scheduled for June 7, 2022. 249 In accordance with Elections Code section 9212, the Council ordered a report to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative, if it were to qualify for the ballot and be adopted by the voters. The City Clerk/Elections Official received the final report on May 24,2022. The presentation to the Council and consideration of that report is a separate agenda item for this regular meeting. On May 3, 2022, Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2022-009 and 2022-010 calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the election of certain officers and requesting the BOS to consolidate this election with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date. Proposed are resolutions to: (A) Submit to the City's qualified electors the Initiative at the next General Municipal Election, to be held on November 8, 2022, so as to comply with Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405. (B) Set priorities for filing written arguments and rebuttal arguments, and direct the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis regarding the Initiative. Arguments and rebuttals are governed by Elections Code sections 9282- 9287. For measures placed on the ballot by petition like the Initiative, the persons filing the Initiative may file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the Council may submit an argument against it (Elections Code section 9282). Arguments must be 300 words or less, and rebuttals must be 250 words or less. Because the General Municipal Election will be consolidated with the Statewide General Election, the ROV has provided the following deadlines by which arguments and rebuttals are due, listed in the ROV's General Municipal Election Calendar - November 8, 2022, included as Attachment 1: August 22, 2022 - last day to file arguments • August 23 - September 1, 2022 - public examination period • September 1, 2022 - last day to file rebuttals to arguments 250 The impartial analysis is governed by Elections Code section 9280. The City Attorney is required to show the effect of the Initiative on existing law and the operation of the Initiative if adopted. The impartial analysis must be 500 words or less and will be printed preceding the arguments for and against the measure in the ballot pamphlet. (C) Request the BOS to consolidate the Initiative election with the General Municipal Election and Statewide General Election, to be held on November 8, 2022. "I , IE IR.II T'1 E Council may elect to adopt the initiative ordinance, without alteration, on the day the certification of the petition is presented, or within 10 days after it is presented. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk/Elections Official Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. ROV General Municipal Election Calendar - November 8, 2022 251 252 RESOLUTION NO. 2022 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE PROPOSING THE "PHASE- OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON -HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA" AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER S, 2022, AS CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2022 — 009 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of California and the City of La Quinta, a General Municipal Election has been called to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-009, adopted on May 3, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405 hereby authorizes to submit to the voters of the City of La Quinta at that General Municipal Election an initiative ordinance and ballot measure proposing the "phase -out and permanent ban of non -hosted short-term vacation rentals in non-exempt areas of the City of La Quinta" by December 311 2024. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council, pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405, hereby orders to be submitted to the voters of the City of La Quinta at the General Municipal Election the following ballot question for the initiative ordinance and ballot measure, known as the "'Phase -Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non -Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta" by December 31, 2024: Shall the measure, proposing to phase -out and permanently ban "non -hosted short- YES term vacation rentals," as defined, in non- exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by NO December 311 2024, be adopted? 253 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Calling Election — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 2 of 8 SECTION 2. The complete text of the initiative ordinance to be submitted to the voters is attached hereto as Exhibit A, as written by the proponents. The title of the initiative ordinance shall be known as and may be cited as "Phase - Out and Permanent Ban of Non -Hosted Short -Term Vacation Rentals in Non - Exempt Areas of the City of La Quints." SECTION 3. The initiative ordinance and accompanying ballot measure submitted to the voters of the City of La Quinta pursuant to Section 1 of this resolution shall not be adopted unless a simple majority (50% plus at least 1 vote) of the City's voters voting on this ballot measure vote eyes." SECTION 4. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. SECTION 5. Notice of the time and place holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and submit such to the Registrar of Voters for the County of Riverside. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Quinta held this day of , 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 254 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Calling Election — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 3 of 8 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 255 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Calling Election — November 8, 2022 EXHIBIT A Adopted: , 2022 Page 4 of 8 INITIATIVE ORDINANCE TEXT OF INITIATIVE BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE SHALL BE AMENDED TO PHASE -OUT NON -HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 WHEREAS, Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code relates to short-term vacation rentals (STVRs); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City of La Quinta (""City") by Article XI, Sections 5 and 7 of the California Constitution and the City Charter, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land, property and businesses within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, welfare, and safety; and WHEREAS, the people of La Quinta have repeatedly expressed objections to their City Council regarding the proliferation and density of non - hosted STVRs in residential neighborhoods due to the negative impact on their quality of life, and the character and livability of their neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the detrimental impacts of non -hosted STVRs on residential neighborhoods has not been adequately mitigated by the City Council resulting in ongoing interruption to residents' peaceful enjoyment of their homes and forcing residents to police continuous STVR issues such as excessive noise, disorderly conduct, overcrowding, traffic, parking, and trash; and WHEREAS, STVRs are a commercial use of residential dwellings, generating income based on the short-term rental of residential dwellings akin to other commercial uses banned in residential neighborhoods, and the people of La Quinta have determined that the public nuisances created by non -hosted STVR commercial activities in residential neighborhoods is incompatible with surrounding residential uses; and WHEREAS, the proliferation of non -hosted STVRs in residential neighborhoods has depleted the availability of housing for new homeowners and long-term tenants who contribute to the fabric of the community, spend their earnings locally, populate the school district, and operate local businesses or provide labor to local businesses; and 256 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Calling Election — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 5 of 8 WHEREAS, this initiative phases out all types of non -hosted STVRs including general STVRs and primary residence STVRs, in all residential dwelling units in the City not exempted by the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) below, by December 31, 2024, including residential dwelling units governed by homeowners' associations (HOAs) and covenants, conditions & restrictions (CC&Rs), but shall have no effect on hosted homeshare STVRs, vacation rentals exempted by the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) below, or bed and breakfast operations; and WHEREAS, the people of La Quinta acknowledge the importance of tourism to the La Quinta economy and call for the expansion of STVR units in exempt areas that meet the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) below; and WHEREAS, the people of La Quinta shall provide a phase -out period to minimize the economic impacts to existing non -hosted STVR permit holders but shall prohibit the issuance of any new non -hosted STVR permits in residential neighborhoods (not exempted by the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) below) as of the effective date of this Initiative. NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ITEM 1: Section 3.25.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code shall be amended to add the following definition: "Non -hosted short-term vacation rental" is a type of short-term vacation rental whereby the owner rents a short-term vacation rental unit (as defined herein), for compensation, for periods of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, while the owner does not live on -site or in the dwelling unit, throughout the occupant's stay. ITEM 2: Section 3.25.055 of the La Quinta Municipal Code shall be deleted in its entirety and the following shall be added in its place: 3.25.055 - non -issuance of new non -hosted short-term vacation rental permits and phase -out of existing non -hosted short-term vacation permits. A. Commencing on the effective date of this Initiative, there shall be no processing of, or issuance for, any applications for a new non -hosted short- term vacation rental permit, required by this chapter to use or operate a non - hosted short-term vacation rental unit in the city, except applications for a new non -hosted short-term vacation rental permit covering a non -hosted short-term vacation rental unit that meets one (1) or more of the following: 257 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Calling Election — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 6 of 8 1. A residential dwelling within a residential project located in the CT Tourist Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.070 (or successor section) of this code and depicted in the city's official zoning map. 2. A residential dwelling within a residential project located in the VC Village Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.100 (or successor section) of this code and depicted in the city's official zoning map. 3. A residential dwelling within a residential project subject to a development agreement with the city, or subject to a condition of approval(s) attached to any entitlement approved by the city (including but not limited to a specific plan, subdivision map, or site development permit), pursuant to which non -hosted short-term vacation rentals are a permitted use, and the residential dwelling's use as a non -hosted short-term vacation rental is authorized under a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), for the residential project. 4. A residential dwelling within the area covered by the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan. 5. A residential dwelling is located adjacent to the CT Tourist Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.070 and depicted in the city's official zoning map, and within the following boundaries; west of Avenida Obregon, south of the Avenida Fernando, east of Calle Mazatlan, and north of the driveway access between Calle Mazatlan and Avenida Obregon that serves as a southern boundary for the La Quinta Tennis Villas/Tennis Condos area identified on page 25 of the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan, 121 E— Amendment 5 (as may be subsequently amended from time to time). For purposes of this subsection, "adjacent to" means across the street from or accessible by a driveway or service road designed to provide access to area(s) within the CT Tourist Commercial District zone. B. The city manager or authorized designee shall have the authority to implement policies or procedures to review and verify whether an application for a new short-term vacation rental permit meets the criteria set forth in this section. C. Until the expiration date of all non -hosted short-term vacation rental permits (not exempted by Section 3.25.055(A) above) in 2024 as defined below, this section shall not apply to applications for a renewal of an existing non -hosted short-term vacation rental permit and business license, submitted in compliance with this chapter, including when the short-term vacation rental ONT- Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Calling Election — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 7 of 8 permit is under suspension during the time for processing the renewal application. Applications for renewals must be submitted as prescribed by this chapter, and will be issued or denied based on the criteria pursuant to this chapter. Any short-term vacation rental unit, covered by a permit that is subject to an application for renewal, which is under temporary suspension in violation of this chapter or any other provisions of this code, shall not become permitted to use the dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit until all violations that led to the temporary suspension have been remedied and the suspension has expired. Any revoked short-term vacation rental permit shall not be eligible for renewal or new short-term vacation rental permit. D. Commencing with the effective date of this Initiative, holders of non - hosted, valid short-term vacation rental permits shall continue to be eligible for renewal of their non -hosted short-term vacation rental permit however, all non -hosted short-term vacation rental permits, not exempted by Section 3.25.055(A) above, shall have an expiration date of December 31, 2024 or earlier. Beginning January 1, 2025, all permits for non -hosted short-term vacation rental units, not exempted by Section 3.25.055(A) above, shall be invalid. Commencing January 1, 2025, there shall be no non -hosted short-term vacation rental permits issued or renewed to use or operate any privately owned residential dwelling (as defined in Section 3.25.030) as a non -hosted short-term vacation rental unit unless the unit meets one or more of the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) above, or the unit holds a valid homeshare short-term vacation rental permit. ITEM 3: EFFECTIVE DATE. This initiate shall be adopted on the date the La Quinta City Council certifies the passage of this Initiative's ballot measure based on the election results and the effective date shall be ten (10) calendar days following that certification. ITEM 4: CONFORMING CODE PROVISIONS. Any provision of the La Quinta Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Initiative, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Initiative. ITEM 5: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Initiative or resulting ballot measure is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, then such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Initiative or ballot measure. The People of the City "Ov Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Calling Election — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 8 of 8 of La Quinta hereby declare they would have voted for this ballot measure, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 260 RESOLUTION NO. 2022 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS REGARDING AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE, PROPOSING THE "PHASE -OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON - HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA," AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of California and the City of La Quinta, a General Municipal Election has been called to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-0091 adopted on May 3, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405, has authorized to submit to the voters of the City of La Quinta at the November 8, 2022, General Municipal Election, the following ballot question for the initiative ordinance and ballot measure, proposing to phase -out and permanent ban of non -hosted short-term vacation rentals in non-exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by December 31, 2024 (the "Measure"): Shall the measure, proposing to phase -out and permanently ban "non -hosted short- YES term vacation rentals," as defined, in non- exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by NO December 311 2024, be adopted? WHEREAS, Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the California Elections Code provides for the filing of written arguments and rebuttal arguments, and for the submittal of an impartial analysis by the city attorney, for ballot measures that have qualified to be presented to the voters at municipal elections. 261 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Impartial Analysis, Arguments, and Rebuttals Adopted: , 2022 Page 2 of 4 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9282(a), for measures placed on the ballot by petition, the persons filing the initiative petition may file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the City Council may submit an argument against the Measure. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9282(b), the City Council also authorizes the City Council collectively, or any member or members of the City Council authorized by the full Council, or any individual voter who is eligible to vote on the Measure, or bona fide association of citizens, or any combination of voters and associations, to file a written argument in Favor OR Against the Measure, accompanied by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its principal officers. The filer of a written argument may change or withdraw the argument until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk - August 22F 2022, after which no arguments for or against the Measure may be submitted to the City Clerk. No argument shall exceed 300 words in length, and no more than five signatures shall appear on any argument. SECTION 2. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9285(a), when the City Clerk has selected the arguments for and against the Measure, which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the City Clerk shall send copies of the argument in favor of the Measure to the authors of the argument against, and copies of the argument against to the authors in favor. The authors may prepare and submit rebuttal arguments not to exceed 250 words. The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, accompanied by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct arguments. On the ballot, each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut, and no more than five signatures shall appear on any rebuttal argument. SECTION 3. Any written argument or rebuttal argument filed with the City Clerk shall be accompanied by the Statement of the Author Form required by California Elections Code section 9600. The City Clerk shall provide such form upon request. SECTION 4. If more than one argument for or more than one argument against the Measure is submitted to the City Clerk within the time prescribed, 262 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Impartial Analysis, Arguments, and Rebuttals Adopted: , 2022 Page 3 of 4 the City Clerk shall select one of the arguments in favor and one of the arguments against the Measure for printing and distribution to the voters in accordance with the priority set forth in California Elections Code section 9287. SECTION 5. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9280, the City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the Measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the Measure, not to exceed 500 words, showing the effect of the Measure on the existing law and the operation of the Measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments for or against the Measure - August 22, 2022. The impartial analysis shall include a statement indicating whether the Measure was placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by the City Council. In the event the entire text of the Measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information guide, there shall be printed immediately below the impartial analysis, in no less than 10-font bold type, the following: "The above statement is an impartial analysis of Ordinance or Measure (enter assigned Measure number here). If you desire a copy of the ordinance or measure, please call the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 777 - 7035 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you." SECTION 6. Pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9282 and 9285, the City Clerk shall print, or cause to be printed, in the Official Sample Ballot, the entire text of the arguments for or against the Measure, and the rebuttal arguments, in uniform type, style and spacing. SECTION 7. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9295, materials related to this initiative Measure will be available for public examination for no fewer than ten (10) calendar days, from August 23 through September L 2022, immediately following the filing deadline for submissions of those materials, and prior to being submitted for printing in the voter information guide. The City Clerk shall post notice in the Clerk's Office of the specific dates that the examination period will run. SECTION 8. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Quinta held this day of , 2022, by the following vote: 263 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Impartial Analysis, Arguments, and Rebuttals Adopted: , 2022 Page 4 of 4 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 264 RESOLUTION NO. 2022 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATE WITH THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, AND THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE, AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA PROPOSING THE "PHASE -OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON - HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA" BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of California and the City of La Quinta, a General Municipal Election has been called to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-009, adopted on May 3, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405, hereby authorizes to submit to the voters of the City of La Quinta at that General Municipal Election an initiative ordinance and accompanying ballot measure proposing the "phase -out and permanent ban of non -hosted short-term vacation rentals in non-exempt areas in the City of La Quinta," by December 31, 2024 (the "Measure"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-010, adopted by the City Council on May 3, 2022, the City of La Quinta has requested that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date, and that within the City of La Quinta, the precincts, vote centers, polling places and election officers of the two elections, and that the election department of the County of Riverside canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election, and that the General Municipal Election and Statewide General Election be held in all respects as if there were only one election; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that, in addition to the consolidation of the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election for purposes set forth in Resolution No. 2022-010, that the Measure, identified above 265 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Consolidate Election with Riverside County — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 2 of 4 similarly be submitted to the qualified electors of the City of La Quinta at the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election, and similarly consolidated with Statewide General Election. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements in California Elections Code section 10403, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside is hereby requested, in addition to the consolidation request set forth in Resolution No. 2022-010, to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 81 2022, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of the City of La Quinta an initiative ordinance and ballot measure proposing the "phase -out and permanent ban of non -hosted short-term vacation rentals in non-exempt areas in the City of La Quinta." The exact form of the measure and question to be submitted to the voters at the General Municipal Election is the following: Shall the measure, proposing to phase -out and permanently ban "non -hosted short- YES term vacation rentals," as defined, in non- exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by NO December 311 2024, be adopted? SECTION 2. That the county election department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. SECTION 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the county elections department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election. SECTION 4. That the City of La Quinta recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the county elections department of the County of Riverside. Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Consolidate Election with Riverside County — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 3 of 4 SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the permanent record of resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Quinta held this day of , 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 267 Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure — Consolidate Election with Riverside County — November 8, 2022 Adopted: , 2022 Page 4 of 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT 1 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 Page 1 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) The materials contained in this calendar represent the research and opinions of the staff at the Riverside County Registrar of Voters. The contents of this calendar and any legal interpretations contained herein are not to be relied upon as being correct either factually or as a legal opinion. Reliance on the content without prior submission to and approval of your appropriate public counsel is at the reader's risk. Please call (951) 486-7200 if you have any questions or comments or visit our website at www.voteinfo.net. Thank you. DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION, ADOPT RESOLUTION CALLING ELECTION (E.C. §§ 330, 10002, 10403.5, 13307) July 1 By this suggested date adopt resolutions regarding the following: (130) City Council Ordering election including incumbents and offices to be filled. Requesting Registrar of Voters to conduct the election. ft Regulations whether candidates or the city will pay for candidate statements. PUBLISH NOTICE OF ELECTION (E.C. § 12101; G.C. §§ 6060, 6061) July 4 — Publish Notice of Election one time between these dates. The notice will July 18 City Clerk include the date and time of the election, nomination deadline, the offices (127 — 113) to be filled, and hours the polls will be open. The Notice is to be published in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City. Federal law requires publication to be made in English and Spanish. Registrar of INDEPENDENCE DAY (CO. ORD. 358.8) July 4 Voters The Registrar of Voters office will be closed. July 6 BOUNDARY CHANGES (E.C. § 12262) (125) City Council Last -day boundary changes may be made for this election. THE LAST DAY TO ADOPT REGULATIONS REGARDING CANDIDATE July 11 City Council / STATEMENTS (E.C. § 13307) (120) City Clerk Last day for a local agency to adopt or amend regulations regarding charges for printing a candidate's statement. PRECINCT SECTION TO COMPLETE BOUNDARY CHANGES July 15 Registrar of (116) Voters No later than this date, the precinct section must complete boundary changes. NOMINATION PERIOD (E.C. §§ 10220, 10224, 13107, 13307, 13309, 13311; G.C. §§ 36503, 87201 et seq.) Between these dates, candidates may obtain and file nomination papers July 18 — Candidates / with the City Clerk during normal business hours as posted. The Ballot August 12 City Clerk Designation Worksheet must be filed at the same time as the Declaration (113 — 88) of Candidacy. Candidate statements must be filed at the same time nomination petitions are filed. Statements are confidential until the deadline for filing has passed. Statement of Economic Interest must be filed by the final filing date. 269 Page 2 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) D�4,TE� � PERSON DESCRIPTION. RESPONSIBLE CODE OF FAIR CAMPAIGN PRACTICES (E.C. § 20400 et seq.) July 18 — Candidates / At the time a candidate is issued nomination papers each candidate will August 12 City Clerk be issued a Code of Fair Campaign Practices. Filing it is voluntary and it (113 — 88) may be filed any time before the election. It is available for public inspection until 30 days after the election. July 18 — STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST (G.C. §§ 87200 et seq.) August 12 Candidates / City Clerk A Statement of Economic Interests must be filed for all candidates by the (113 — 88) close of the nomination period. LAST DAY TO FILE NOMINATION PAPERS AND/OR WITHDRAW (E.C. § 10220 et seq.; G. C. § 87207 et seq.) Nomination papers and candidate statements must be filed no later than August 12 Candidates / this date. Candidates may withdraw their nomination until the close of the (88) City Clerk nomination period. III PUBLIC EXAMINATION PERIOD (E.C. § 13313) There will be a 10-day examination period for Candidate Statements filed from August 13 through August 22. ORDINANCE/MEASURE (E.C. §§ 9222, 9223, 13247) Last day for a copy of the ordinance or measure to be submitted to the August 12 City Clerk Registrar of Voters if a measure is to be included on the ballot. A copy shall (88) be made available to any voter. The statement of all measures submitted to the voters shall be abbreviated on the ballot. The statement shall contain not more than 75 words for each measure to be voted on. PUBLISH NOTICE OF ELECTION (E.C. §12111; G.C. §§ 6060, 6061) The City Clerk shall publish a notice of election as soon as possible pursuant to section 12111 of the California Elections Code. A synopsis of August 12 the measure(s) shall be included in the publication. Government Code § (88) City Clerk 6061 requires the notice to be published once. The last day to submit arguments to the City Clerk should also be included in the notice. The City Clerk shall consolidate the notice of election and the notice of measure to be voted on into one notice if the measure was placed on the ballot before the notice of election is published. LAST DAY TO WITHDRAW CANDIDATE STATEMENTS (E.C. § 13307) August 15 Candidates / The last day to withdraw candidate statements unless there is an extension (85) City Clerk of the nomination period. Withdrawal of candidate statements must be in writing to the City Clerk. 270 Page 3 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) D�4,TE� � PERSON DESCRIPTION. RESPONSIBLE EXTENSION OF NOMINATION PERIOD (E. C. § 10225) If nomination papers for an incumbent officer of the city are not filed by the 88th day before the election, during normal business hours, as posted, the voters shall have until the 83rd day before the election during normal business hours, as posted, to nominate candidates other than the person August 17 Candidates / who was the incumbent on the 88th day, for that incumbent's elective (83) City Clerk office. This is not applicable where there is no incumbent eligible to be elected. If this section is applicable, a candidate may withdraw his or her declaration of candidacy until the 831 day before the election. PUBLIC EXAMINATION PERIOD (E.C. § 13313) There will be a 10-day examination period for Candidate Statements filed from August 18 through August 27. LAST DAY TO WITHDRAW MEASURE (E.C. § 9605) August 17 City Council Whenever a legislative body has ordered that a measure be submitted to (83) the voters of any jurisdiction at an election, the order of election shall not be amended or withdrawn after this date. INSUFFICIENT NOMINEES -POSSIBLE PROCEDURES (E.C. § 10229) If on this date no one or only one person has been nominated, the officer conducting the election shall inform the governing body that it may, at a regular meeting or special meeting held before the election, adopt one of the following: 1. Appoint the person who was nominated. 2. If no one has been nominated, appoint any eligible elector. 3. Hold the election. August 17 (83) City Clerk / City Council The provisions of this section shall not apply if, at the regularly scheduled municipal election, more than one person has been nominated to another city office to be elected on a citywide basis or, a city measure has qualified and is to be submitted to the voters at that municipal election. PUBLISH NOTICE OF FACTS (G. C. § 6061) The City Clerk shall publish a notice of the facts described in this section and the courses of action available. After the fifth day following the date of publication, the City Council may make the appointment or direct an election to be held. WITHDRAW CANDIDATE STATEMENT (EXTENSION) (E.C. §§ 10516, 13307) August 18 Candidates / (82) City Clerks In the event there is an extension of the nomination period, candidates may have until this date to withdraw their candidate statement. Withdrawal must be in writing to the City Clerk. RANDOMIZED ALPHABET (E. C. § 13112) August 18 Secretary of (82) State On this date, the Secretary of State shall conduct a drawing of the alphabet for determining the order of candidates' names on the ballot. 271 Page 4 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) D�4,TE� � PERSON DESCRIPTION. RESPONSIBLE SUBMIT NAMES OF CANDIDATES TO THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS (E.C. § 10403) August 19 (81) City Clerk The last day to submit to the Registrar of Voters names and ballot designations of candidates as they are to appear on the ballot. The Certified List should be submitted in alphabetical order by the office. PUBLISH NOMINEES (E.C. § 12110) August 22 City Clerk Suggested date to publish candidate's names in the random order that (78) they will appear on the ballot, and the respective offices for which they have been nominated. IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE (E.C. § 9280) The governing body may direct the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the City Attorney. This is the suggested date for the City Attorney to prepare and submit an analysis of measure showing the effect it will have on the existing law, etc. if so directed by the governing body. The analysis shall include a statement indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city. The analysis shall be printed in the August 22 City Attorney / Voter Information Guide section of the Sample Ballot preceding the (78) City Clerk arguments. The impartial analysis shall not exceed 500 words. In the event the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot or in the Voter Information Guide section portion of the County Voter Information Guide, there shall be immediately below the impartial analysis a statement notifying voters that they may obtain a copy of the ordinance or measure by calling the City Clerk's office and requesting one. PUBLIC EXAM PERIOD (E.C. § 9295) There will be a 10-day exam period from August 23 through September 1. LAST DAY TO FILE ARGUMENTS (E. C. §§ 9282, 9283, 9286) The last date to file arguments with the City Clerk regarding any measure to be on the ballot. Arguments shall not exceed 300 words and shall be August 22 Proponents / accompanied by a Statement of Authors form. No more than five authors (78) Opponents / may sign the statement. City Clerk to forward a file copy of the arguments City Clerk to the Registrar of Voters. IM PUBLIC EXAMINATION PERIOD (E.C. § 9295) There will be a 10-day examination period from August 23 through September 1. 272 Page 5 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) D�4,TE� � PERSON DESCRIPTION. RESPONSIBLE INSUFFICIENT NOMINEES — ACTION BY GOVERNING BODY (E.C. § 10229) If by the 751" day before the municipal election, no person has been August 25 appointed to office pursuant to E.C. § 10229, the election will be held. (75) City Council Notwithstanding Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 8600) of Division 8 or any other provision of the law to the contrary, if the governing body of the city makes an appointment pursuant to E.C. § 10229, the City Clerk shall not accept for filing any statement of write-in candidacy, which is submitted after the appointment. LAST DAY TO FILE REBUTTALS TO ARGUMENTS (E.C. § 9285) Last date for authors of primary arguments to file rebuttals to arguments with the City Clerk. Rebuttals are limited to 250 words. September 1 Proponents / Opponents / NOTE: Rebuttals only apply when the legislative body has adopted (68) City Clerk provisions pursuant to E.C. § 9285 I% PUBLIC EXAM PERIOD (E. C. § 9295) There will be a 10-day exam period from September 2 through September 11. Registrar of LABOR DAY (CO. ORD. 358.8) September 5 Voters The Registrar of Voters office will be closed. FIRST DAY NOMINATION PAPERS FOR WRITE-IN CANDIDACY WILL BE AVAILABLE (E. C. § 8600 et seq.) September 12 Candidates / Any qualifying person wishing to file as a write-in candidate may pick up (57) City Clerk nomination papers beginning on this date. Papers must be filed with the City Clerk no later than 14 days before Election Day. Write-in candidates must also file Statement of Economic Interest and campaign disclosure statements. September 13 Registrar of ORDER PRINTING OF ELECTION MATERIAL (56) Voters Suggested date to prepare copy for printer and order ballots. FILING PERIOD FOR FIRST PRE -ELECTION CAMPAIGN September 25 — Candidates / DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (G. C. §§ 84200.5, 84200.8) September 29 Committees / The filing period for 1s` pre -election campaign statement covers (44 — 40) City Clerk transactions through September 24. Statements must be filed online or sent by personal delivery or first-class mail. 273 Page 6 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) D�4,TE� � PERSON DESCRIPTION. RESPONSIBLE SATELLITE LOCATION PRESS RELEASE (E. C. § 3018) Notice of satellite locations shall be made by the elections official by the issuance of a general news release, issued not later than 14 days before voting at the satellite location, except that in a county with a declared September 26 Registrar of emergency or disaster, notice shall be made not later than 48 hours before (43) Voters voting at the satellite location. The news release shall set forth the following information: ft The satellite location or locations. ft The dates and hours the satellite location or locations will be open. ft A telephone number that voters may use to obtain information regarding vote -by -mail ballots and the satellite locations. MAIL COUNTY VOTER INFORMATION GUIDE AND OTHER ELECTION MATERIALS TO VOTERS (E.C. §§ 9223, 9280 et seq., 13303, 13307; September 29 — Registrar of G.C. § 57148) October 29 (40 — 10) Voters Between these dates, the Registrar of Voters shall mail a County Voter Information Guide to each voter, who is registered at least 29 days before the election. October 10 Registrar of COLUMBUS DAY (CO. ORD. 358.8) (29) Voters The Registrar of Voters office will be closed. MAILED BALLOT PRECINCTS (E. C. §§ 3005, 3010, 3017, 3018, 3020) Approximate date to mail notices to voters in mailed ballot precincts and October 10 Registrar of send official ballot and election material. Mail ballot precincts have less (29) Voters than 250 voters. Ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day and received by the elections official within seven days after Election Day to be counted. PRECINCTS, POLLING PLACE & ELECTION OFFICERS (E.C. §§ 12280 et seq., 12300 et seq.) October 10 Registrar of The last day for the Registrar of Voters to establish polling places and (29) Voters appoint election officers for this election. Immediately following the appointment, the Registrar shall mail appointment notices to election officers. PUBLISH POLLING PLACE & CENTRAL COUNTING PLACE (E.C. §§ October 10 — Registrar of 12105, 12109) October 29 Voters (29-10) Suggested date to publish polling place. The notice will include the hours that the polls will be open and a Notice of Central Counting Place. VOTE -BY -MAIL BALLOT APPLICATIONS (E.C. §§ 3001, 3006, 3021, October 10 — Registrar of 3200) November 1 (29-7) Voters Applications for Vote -by -Mail ballots may be made in person or by mail during this time frame. 274 Page 7 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) D�4,TE� � PERSON DESCRIPTION. RESPONSIBLE PROCESS BALLOTS (E.C. § 15101 et. seq.) October 18 Registrar of When ballots are to be counted by computer, the Registrar of Voters may (21) Voters begin processing ballots 15 business days before the election. No count may be made until 8:00 p.m. on Election Day. FILING PERIOD FOR SECOND PRE -ELECTION CAMPAIGN October 23 — Candidates / DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (G.C. §§ 84200.5, 84200.8) October 27 Committees / The filing period for 2nd pre -election campaign statement covers (16 — 12) City Clerk transactions through October 22. Statements must be filed online or sent by personal delivery or guaranteed overnight service. COLLECTION CENTERS PUBLIC NOTICE (E.C. § 15260) October 24 Registrar of In establishing a collection center, the elections official may designate a (15) Voters group of precincts which the center shall serve, and this designation shall be available for public inspection no later than 15 days before the election. October 24 Registrar of CLOSE OF REGISTRATION (E.C. §§ 2102, 2106) (15) Voters The last day to register or transfer registration for this election. FILE DECLARATION OF WRITE-IN CANDIDACY (E.C. §§ 8600 et seq., October 25 Candidates / 15340 et seq.) (14) City Clerk The last day for write-in candidates to submit their write-in nomination papers including petitions to the City Clerk. POST -ELECTION OFFICERS & POLLING PLACE (E.C. § 12105.5) October 25 — Not less than one week before the election, the elections official shall post November 1 Registrar of a list of all current polling places and a list of election officers appointed by (14 — 7) Voters the 15t" day before the election. The elections official shall post this list in his or her office and on his or her Web site. The list shall remain posted for 30 days after completion of the canvass. LIST OF VOTERS AND POLLING PLACE INFORMATION October 31 Registrar of (8) Voters The approximate date that the Registrar of Voters will provide a list of voters to the City Clerk with polling place information. LOGIC AND ACCURACY TESTING (E. C. § 15000) November 1 Registrar of No later than seven days before any election, the elections official shall (7) Voters conduct a test or series of tests to ensure that every device used to tabulate ballots accurately records each vote. MANUAL TALLY PUBLIC NOTICE (E.C. § 15360) November 4 Registrar of The manual tally shall be a public process, with the official conducting the (4) Voters election providing at least a five-day public notice of the time and place of the manual tally and of the time and place of the selection of the precincts to be tallied before conducting the tally and selection. 275 Page 8 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) DATE � PERSON DESCRIPTION. RESPONSIBLE ELECTION DAY (E. C. §§ 3020, 4103) November 8 VOTE Voted ballots must be received by the elections official no later than 8:00 p.m. on Election Day or be postmarked on or before Election Day and received no later than seven days after Election Day to be counted. November 10 Registrar of CANVASS ELECTION RETURNS (E. C. §§ 10260 et seq., 15301 et seq.) (+2) Voters Registrar of Voters shall commence the official canvass on this day. ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY (E. C. § 15360) November 10 — December 8 Registrar of During the Official Canvass, the Elections Official shall conduct a public (+2 — 30) Voters manual tally in 1 percent of the precincts chosen at random by the elections official. Registrar of VETERANS DAY (CO. ORD. 358.8) November 11 Voters The Registrar of Voters office will be closed. November 24 — Registrar of THANKSGIVING DAY/DAYAFTER THANKSGIVING (CO. ORD. 358.8) November 25 Voters The Registrar of Voters Office will be closed. POSTELECTION OFFICERS & POLLING PLACE (E. C. § 12105.5) Not later than 28 days after the election, the elections official shall post an December 6 Registrar of updated list of polling places and election officers that served on Election (+28) Voters Day. The elections official shall post this list in his or her office and on his or her Web site. The list shall remain posted for 30 days after completion of the canvass. STATEMENT OF RESULTS (E. C. §15372) December 8 Registrar of (+30) Voters No later than this date, the Registrar of Voters will certify the election results. DECLARE CANDIDATES ELECTED (E. C. §§ 10262, 10263) City Clerk / The governing body shall meet at its usual place of meeting no later than December 8 City Council / the next regularly scheduled city council meeting following the (+30) Candidates presentation of the canvass of the returns, or at a special meeting called for this purpose, to declare the results and to install the newly elected officers. COST OF ELECTION December 8 Registrar of (+30) Voters Approximate date to send an invoice to jurisdiction for the cost of the election. FILING PERIOD FOR SEMI-ANNUAL CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE January 1 — Candidates / STATEMENT (G.C. § 84200) January31 Committees / City Clerk The statement covers transactions through December 31. Statements must be filed online or sent by personal delivery or first-class mail. Note: Whenever a date prescribed by law falls on a weekend or holiday, such act may be performed on the next business day (E. C. § 15; G.C. §§ 6700, 6701) 276 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 City of �La Qt.jirvta w11- C."AYI I II IEIE'1" G June 7, 2022 SI.. 0 1F IR.IE IR I" IIEIINIID "I""'i'TILIE: DISCUSS FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED BUDGET RIIECQI IE IN ID T'1 a IN Discuss fiscal year 2022/23 preliminary proposed budget. E IECU"I"'IVE SQM14XRY • The May 17, 2022 City Council budget study session focused on the General Fund and Internal Service Funds. • This study session focuses on review of Special Revenue Funds and Capital Funds of the City. • Total non -General Fund revenues are $31,844,730 and total expenditures are $33,490,608 excluding the Enterprise Fund which will be presented at the June 21, 2022 Council meeting. • Final budget adoption is scheduled for the June 21, 2022 Council meeting. I '1 S C L '111 III C"I Non -General Fund revenues total $31,844,730 while expenditures total $33,490,608. Funds with expenses greater than revenues are utilizing fund balance. BACKGR, 111411 JN ILY' The goal of the second study session is to provide an overview and allow time to meet with interested parties to address details that may not be easily conveyed in a study session format. The Fiscal Year 2022/23 Proposed Budget Overview (Attachment 1) provides a narrative for all Special Funds. Line -item details for these revenues and expenses are located in Exhibit A of the Attachment. 277 I ERNA"rivES The Council may wish to request further information regarding specific items and provide direction regarding the next steps in the overall budget process, prior to budget adoption scheduled for June 21, 2022. Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Fiscal Year 2022/23 Proposed Budget Overview 278 ATTACHMENT 1 u 2: . . ���,,,�������� C ���,,,�������� ���,,,� �� ���,,,�������� ���°I IIIIIIIIIII°°.i°°� CALIFORNIA O IIIII � IIII�����I:' ������ IIIIIIIIIIII� The second budget study session provides an overview of Special Revenue funds and Capital Funds of the City. Exhibit A to this report provides line -item details of revenues and expenditures for all funds. The final budget is scheduled for Council adoption on June 21, 2022. This year's budget process was unique due to the continued impact that the world-wide COVID-19 pandemic has had on City revenues and operations. The proposed budget anticipates the beginning of a recovery, while acknowledging ongoing uncertainty and economic volatility associated with the pandemic, ongoing supply chain concerns, geopolitical risk and inflationary pressures. As always, the City will maintain department operations that are in balance with its revenues to ensure balanced budgets are possible in future years. A one -page summary, found in Exhibit A with the proposed budget, provides a quick reference of all proposed revenues and expenditures by fund. The Supplemental Information section of the Proposed Budget provides a description of each fund. 311111''IIII' ill„ 'IIII' LIIIIIIIIIIII ""„IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII' Special Revenue Funds account for specific revenues and their related expenditures that are legally required to be held in separate funds. Revenues are derived from developer impact fees, property tax assessments, State and Federal programs, housing income, or operations. These restricted funds are for road repairs, recycling programs, art in public places, housing activities, police programs, and the administration of retiree benefits through trusts. The final page of this report provides a summary of revenue and expenses by Special Fund. Gas Tax Fund Revenue projections are provided by the State and have largely recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic; it is estimated that total local streets and roads allocations will grow by $316,131 in 2022/23. The General fund is anticipated to transfer $100,000 into the Gas Tax Fund (a $90,000 decrease from the current 2021/22 contribution which was used for the Lake Cahuilla road improvements). Increases in expenditures include salary and benefits (annual step increases and health costs), operational expenses such as safety gear and uniforms due to higher costs, and additional machinery and equipment to assist with efficiency in operations. The increase in fleet maintenance expenses is due to additional vehicles allocated to the fund. Transfers out for CIP projects total $940,211 for the Dune Palms Improvements from Fred Waring to Miles Avenue. The Lighting and Landscape District (LLD) Fund is partially funded with $982,300 from property tax assessments. To ensure continued citywide landscaping, the General Funds is projected to contribute $900,000 in 2022/23. 2022-23 Second Budget Study Session Page 1 279 Increases in expenditures include salary and benefits (annual step increases and health costs), landscape contract increase due to the addition of the X-Park and SilverRock Event Site, and inflationary impacts on materials and fuel costs, utility water rates, and internal service charges. Housing Authority Funds will be presented to the Housing Authority in detail on June 7, 2022. A preliminary review of the proposed budget will be presented to the Housing Commission on June 8, 2022 and is scheduled for adoption on June 21, 2022. Finance Authority Fund includes ongoing expenses that are limited to the filing of an annual State Controller's Report. The 1996 Civic Center Bond was paid off in October 2018 and is noted in the FY 2018/19 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. Overall expenses are decreasing for the Library and Museum Fund compared to FY 2021/22 due to a one-time transfer out to the CIP fund of $2,575,000 for the Village Art Plaza site improvements at the former lumberyard building acquired by the City. Expenditure increases include salary and benefits (annual step increases and health costs), utilities including gas, electricity and water, and operational expenses due to inflationary impacts on costs. An increase of $55,000 from the current fiscal year is due to the County of Riverside library services and programs contract recently amended through June 30, 2024, and includes library, museum, and Makerspace operations. 0 1 Due to the volatility of the current economy, the investment pool interest earnings in most special funds were conservatively budgeted to account for the potential impacts. Measure A Fund provides the City with funding for street maintenance and operations, street repairs and improvements, and new infrastructure of the streets and roads systems. County sales tax revenue is expected to increase by 20% based on projections from the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), which anticipates continued recovery from COVID. Development Impact Fee (DIF) Funds are restricted to capital improvement program expenses. Funds with no expenses in 2022/23 either have no current project commitments or are saving revenues for future fiscal year capital projects. For 2022/23, the Art in Public Places Fund proposed budget includes the maintenance contract, updating the full inventory of art in public places including internal city inspections, and engineering services for new art installations. An increase of $50,000 accounts for additional art purchases due to the added annual art celebration. 2022-23 Second Budget Study Session Page 2 WE IIIIII IIII��� ""'ilY""" IIIIIIIIIIII IIII��Y.IIIII' IIII'��IIIIL'IIII' � IIIIIIIIIIII IIII' C IIII���� IIII' ��� The SilverRock Golf Resort Fund annual management plan with revenue and expenditure detail will be presented to City Council on June 21, 2022. CµA IIII''i'"'1 °°'1°°' IIII' ' IIII'IIII 3° � IIIIIIIIIIII , °°' °°' 1114 IIIII' '" tJ IIII'IIIII. J W' IIII' ' The preliminary Capital Improvement Programs Fund includes revenues and expenditures for projects as presented to City Council on April 5, 2022. The total CIP budget for FY 2022-23 is $13,136,811. Developer reimbursements totaling $400,000 for DIF eligible improvements are budgeted in DIF funds and $500,000 for median landscape improvements is expensed out of the LLD fund. 2022-23 Second Budget Study Session Page 3 281 201 GAS TAX FUND 2,191,011 2,687,351 (496,340) 202 LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 2,867,000 1,909,146 957,854 203 PUBLIC SAFETY FUND 2,000 - 2,000 210 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND CDBG 156,000 152,600 3,400 212 SLESF COPS 101,000 100,000 1,000 215 LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 1,883,300 2,491,176 607,876 220 QUIMBY FUND 25,000 - 25,000 221 AB 939 - CALRECYCLE 64,000 150,000 (86,000) 223 MEASURE A FUND 1 875 000 3 882 000 (2,007,000 225 INFRASTRUCTURE FUND - - - 226 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 12,100 12,000 100 PERFORMANCE FUND 227 STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM 5,000 5,000 - 230 CASp FUND AB 1379 20,200 5,500 14,700 235 SO COAST AIR QUALFFY FUND 54,400 46 500 7,900 241 HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND 1 451,500 1,712,670 261 170 243 RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FUND 20,000 250,000 (230,000) 247 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 15,000 21,500 (6,500) 249 SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND 25,000 20,000 5,000 250 TRANSPORTATION DIF 1 020 000 500 000 520,000 251 PARKS & RECREATION DIF 501,000 500,000 1,000 252 CIVIC CENTER DIF 301,000 250,000 51,000 253* LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 75,000 15,000 60,000 254 COMMUNITY CENTER DIF 152,000 - 152,000 255 STREET FACILITY DIF 10,000 - 10,000 256 PARK FACILITY DIF - - - 257 FIRE PROTECTION DIF 101 000 - 101,000 259 MAINTENANCE FACILITIES DIF FUND 75,500 - 75,500 270 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 153,000 177,000 (24,000) 275 1 LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND 2,200 - 2,200 310 LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY FUND 1,100 1 100 - 401 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 13,136,811 13,136,811 - 405 SA PA1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND 1,000 - 1,000 501 FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT FUND 1,685,000 1,608,750 76,250 502 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND 2,256,708 2,258,054 (1,346) 503 PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 470,000 545,000 (75,000) 504 INSURANCE FUND 1,020,400 984,100 36,300 760 SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 5,500 12,850 (7,350) 761 CERBT OPEB TRUST HEALTH BENEFITS 10,000 1,500 8,500 762 PARS PENSION TRUST 100 000 55 000 45 000 * This fund has an outstanding inter -agency loan due to the Successor Agency. 2022-23 Second Budget Study Session Page 4 282 LL) ()' Q ++ .� 0) o 0 0 0 0 o p D O O O O O O o o O O O O o O O O O O O O o p O G o o O D D G o o O O D O O O O O o m 0) O O O O O N P, 14 wi N N O 00 'T M O M �..I ri 0 Q Q O m Lu p Z V 00 N Ca N a O p X a W> M N N N o 0 0 0 0 ,� co p 00 ,� ,� 00 o o p co O O O 0 N M �i N O O O M rn rn Ln ,--� wl O O 0 O 00 o O M 'i M 'i O O OZ 00 00 M M O O C O O rl O rl o o O N N N � .� O 111 1�1 7 O Lf f L LLnn Ln LnCf r N C M N N LL L 7 U N d 0 0 0 0 0 ,� co O 0 C) ,� ,� 00 o o O 0 o O O O 0 \ (n 0 0 0 0 0 O) Ln i0 O w N ON O O O O 0 0 O O rl O rl O O O O0 O O O O O O O O Oip O O O O O O O O N t0 O O 'O O OM 03 OO O 0 Ln N O O � P N O Ln Ln Ln r, I O 0% 01 pc O l0 l0 ID N a O .� *a *a N ao w 00 N N N N N N N* N O O O M M O N O N N N O� ID r, N r� 01 01 ++ \._ m o N o rn M N M n M rn O M O O 00 N 00 N m n M v G) W W 0 O 0 O N ri > N ._ Ln o ri o r Lri Ni n o _ Ln mN O O O V N ItIt rl rl rl H J N y N o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 00 O O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 Lu p O o 0 0 0 0 o OD r O M 00 o O o O 0 0 o O 00 OD 00 OD 0 0 N N 0 0 O o^ n 0 O o O O m O m 0 o w N oM m NCY) o m tti rn lu 0 O N Iri M Iri Ln " O 0 O ,-i ri Ln Nm of N 1-i N M N O ,-y 01 {0 {0 ^ IA 01 IA IA Z a.+ IN rl 01 01 I, 00 00 j W L 0 U Z Z) 11 J N {+ N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 M DD O O O O 0 0 O O 00 00 00 00 00 N N 0 0 O O Ln N 0 O O O O 1� O N O U N 3 o ri �i io ri ttl 0+ 0 O Iri Lf u1 Ln N 0 O O OLn EL O m N .�-i N r1 r, ID � 0% l0 ID ^ IA � 01 IA IA (n N 0, 0, N n 00 00 C rl rl rl N N N O ri H N 0 o 0 0 � r, p M 0� N M O N I, n M N OD 0 0 O O M IA M N t0 M M .� O O O�� O O O N N 0 O +_+ I� O O P .--i M 00 M !:2 I� o O LO LO .--i '� N N f� I I� O 04 0 M w Ln .. Ln N 0 0 � P% o v N N 01 01 N N x Vl 49 W IA IA y x x x x 2-f0 ID ID ID ID f0 V) ID ID ID ID W (O (O 10 ID N �••� H H H H O i+ O O O O + O O O O O Ul Ul Ul (r1 U) V y� vQ� cO t6 tL3 U U U Ln 0' ++ >, In v� >� �' v v i V1 fA N O O) G F c ++ fA V) N 0) >� to to >� �+ W i O Q Z W >� Ln i v Ln l0 r, n M C L m Z .V ID O O O O O O a) ate' C. C C C. = C 7 0 C O LL> 01 > f0 yCD (A a) >y +�' e. C C C. C LL a C N N N N N C a .--i a V) i .� K LL y (� C U C1 a V) ,� a� .--i a 'Vj a N 0 0 0 0 0 a0-. M OZJ m OZS 01 w C1 C 0 Q ~ W C >, C> L Ln L V) 0 ��., �''� m 4% W = a0.. 03 G£ > U U U U U O U > p (n >� C C U C V) O O N 0) V) U > p !n >� V) O ILL U L> p ` N N N N N m � Qi — a �% �U C L c Q ' L O � w L ._ f6 Q) Q) — a— {Q%J Z � V) V) V) U) V) V) c < 0 c O M ID f � c� � c < 0 � O � L W 41 c a M LL 01 O C LL W O 01 �. O Q O z X y O N L0 O .�-i ON N 0 0 0 y 0 0 O ri N cs O i-Ci 01O N t NO V 0 o 0 0 O m 0 0 M O O tA a r O ID N N � Q� Q� N u O O' C C N N N N N N U, S��z 4j�� 0 0 r �i-Ci�M U��� ���� m m>>� g V) �N����� I a� UO 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l o o s 0 0 0 l o, 0 m, J 10 0 loom 0 0 l o o s 0 0 O D, a l o 0 LL O 1 O O O O O O O o00000 0 co 0000 0 0� 01 M O OMo 0 0 0 0 0 moo O 00 la N O Q 0 Oho OM.!i .!i .!i M.�-i ,�-i M M.! N OMcv MN N Mcv r1i O MOMM 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 N O O O U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 283 w W c +' 0 0)D O O o o O 0-O O O O o O O o o O 0- O 0-C Z) 0, 00 00 O O MM 000 M C 3 10 10 10 Q C = CO 1L � _ U O a O O a M y N N o O 00 O O 00 0 0 0 O 1 N> M" O O O O O O 00 0 0 O O 1 1 N Mm M Ln N If1 1 N N 7 U N y0 O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 N O O O O 0 0 0 O 1 N a N N fV 'D 1D 10 1 O 0 Ln N LA N a -1 N* N o'T 0 0 le le 0 0 n m ID 01 o ++ O O O M M CD rl 00 f N 'y M M M ri N .. .. Na L] H Cn J H N 0) O O 00 O O 00 0 0 0 O 1 LU 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 i LU N = CO,. N Iff If1 �j rl rl , C) W N N N 1 w 0 U Z Z) J N No O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 Q O O O 0O � O O W N = CO N If1 If1 U , a O U) N y N 1f1 1 C O r.jH^ O O O O O r1 O M r1 N f \ 3 n N o 0 N N ,W-1 IT Ln v 10 i N V 0 O fV rl rl M N M 10 1 aV M M pM N N N N M M M f 10 If) If) f6 If) 10 If) I O O O O O O O 1 F H F F H F F F U) to �. L] V) V)Q) L i ate) -M 0 Z O ate0 a, Q) ++ y v 0) �a i =�3 c W oc LL c fD 0) a��0 c u O oO Ol O W E 0 Ol u tea` Vol � N 1n U ;; c a s co 0� c U 'O W Q 01 U � f m 0 O In a� ,c fu U c m 1n E m O >" p V) � a� s c F U c c f0 H M 1 p M w fA c 0 fs L U L ai — ¢ c Q U' c 1 F O i c c - — O Z f W c> ++ O O i O G O D Q (M O o 0 0 L.LL ` O G) O H �1 0 1 0 00 0� O O . rn y ZU) t O,iO � WM 0) e O fA �p 4+ M OHO W W �1-ci�M pp u O 1 O 1 LL W O O O 1 L CD 1 O Q Vl 1 LL 1 1 U Oi al Oi M N I O M O M Op OO M u M M M J 0 0 O O O O U O N O N N ,--� N •--� •--� N N f o 1 o o O 0 O O C 0 0 0 o c rZ n N n d N O � 0 o C 0 o N N n N r\ o •--� O v fA f10 ,y 10 ,y 10 ' O N rl 00 OD ~ rwl ,N'1 ,N'1 to ff) 10 If) If) a+ H a+ a+ a+ � F F F >^ V) V, c y v v 0) , a v a� � a c p O E O O On LL M ccu a> o�umo6 a ' = 01 c U 4)) J N 2 Q p M; u Ln O Q U O 0 c 41 O O Icy O LLI 0 0 0 O O Vl 1 = _ AU)wl N ! 1 1 O O 1 O O 1 CD CDOM N O l0 O ! O M a M o o ts i O ! N N N IT 00 N N 284 D 0 0 0 ID O O g 00 0 a Ij a O 1 c fY j cc 0 coo 0 cc 0 O f i M M 1 00 O 00 0% rn 0 0 OD 00 1 rl � r, 0 a QD 0 O 00 f O o .y i ri LP N 00 m rl Ln N N N n 1 1 ti ri 1 00 o^ 0 O O O 00 00 O 1 I O O o 0 N I 00 ri0000 00 1!1 p� OD N 00 P% 1 j rl fV f i I I 0 0 0 o O 0 0 O f I o^ ^ 0 O 0 0 n 1 00 00 Ln Go m j OD CA N 00 N N N 1 f 1 f i M M io of N O O O 1 00 N O N rl N f m 00O Ln I 0% 00 f ri � V! in in iil i z 0)LL O N O a� O O l7 4-1 f0 +�+ N v It z m Ly O) u i Q OTi � O O 00 O p� fn � ++ a 0 '" a v� Ln a p 3Q� oZf om0?i c L, c - Z O�+pa > ocn > 'u C'u c J 4` J C Q C7 c ♦- m? G cd c o a� L f = li o0 Cm LL yf O }_,� z y Ui 4- 0 0 O O .1 O LL L O L. y 0 d e O 2 c c� LLL.O �"�� (A+'�O N 0 J U1 0 0 O i p00 Ol C M Cc,C 0000 O 001 O O M pap 01 Oi m F M Ln Ln m U) N N N N N O O O O O D O O O O G 0000 O O co pp oop 000 O O O N N 0 0 0 0 O O o p coo coo O � 0 O 0 C O -I 0 O N IA IA IA LP N U) N .�... +i ri N O 0 0 o O O O o p 0 0 O 0 o O O 0 0 0 o 0 O o O O N LA IA IA O N N N t0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o t0 O r, N o rn 00 IA n N N M M O m n N Lrl Ln N n N r• O M n 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 coo coo O 0 O 0 O N N . q 0 o O O N -1 L IA Ln If1 `n 1!1 If1 O N N rf 0 0 o O o 0 CC) coo 0 0 O O o O o O O ko N Ln Ifl O t0 r. O M OJ IA IA IA to 0 O M M I N 01 O M A N r1 r1 r1 0 00 00 N rn t0 N Lr M N 't M m Lr rl O N^ m Ln IA O IA O O OO O O O r, in in iA in fo y in in ns O O v H N H F F H N u F F >, Ln m � p p ul U >, n n 'O L L z z 3 L L CL OL Li OL C1 W m> U E O L.O C1 a�M uOC c 0Ui aa)Ma aNi f } X °r >ca °3 co 0E a<7o'c IX Fc�o' m =¢a c OO J 4-1cO 7 O O cC 0mv > O O 0 0 0 0o-ic) O O N N V Ama)�o M cm Ln O~ w 0 0 p O G 07 O O XO �-1-p dMM y C UI -i -i M VI M c m .--i c M M M Ul -i -i FA 0 0 0 p O 0 o p m Q 0 p 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 1 p O O p Op0o0o00� O'Lo f'1oo pooh p M � M O O O p M P M � M � M O N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 285 w W c d 0 Z) W m cn = R CO W = Ul) U O 0 0 O o rY a N > N N M p N N N N r N 7 U M 'O N W N 0 N O O L.N a N * N ri '> O V N Q G H J W N N ri = ul N O Co � w N c i W w IY � 3 0 U Z Z) J N W Q \ O U ri 7 a O CO (!) N C O ri H N jp O +_+ O Q N H H Z) a g LL O U p o o, 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 �� 0 o O o c 01 o O M 0 o M O O 0 0 O O C � N N M M N N 0 O O C i ri 1 ri 1 r 00 0000 0 0 0 0 N + q 00 O O O O O O O O O O O .-1 O wl f ri ti th Ifl ce fD LD M wl O O M M M p o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O f O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O � ui o C Lf If) O ocl fD O fD ti rl ry N 't 'T N IT "o r♦ O ^ m a% < Dl v't O Ln M ri ri n O O O n 00 fD N p o p o 0 o O O O 0 0 0 O f +N-1 0 0 O O O O O O Iff rn N Ln Lf n n N Ln ri lD 10 .� N N N ri rl 11 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O < C rj [V � Ili P% n N M ri to l0 M In N r ti rl ry O ko tD n Tr RT O O N ITRT O .-1 w {D O N N O n N M O O n N q1 a Ol 01 .. N .. � .. .. y .. .. y .. . 1 fa m f0 fa 10 10 10 1 O O v 0 O O O O 1 X V V v 'W.Z W Z O m O L v W v v W O L w L W a� W O m LL N CL H 12 CL c {L 0 H4E� CLC Y f> O O Ol Z O O 01 c U — v M � aa) u+ IL a` M ri u O C x oif f0 m 1 C O W atS 10 CO VO 'O F c W Z G m 0 (n � O V) 10 >. V) >� 7 W O F W Q W H c Q O W W— Q W c LL m L U 1 - Q O O 1 W c Q 0 U 0 0 O 1 Q C W O O C O V 1 W w y W O M N - 0 0 0 0 0 O p O O � w 0 0� F. y O p O i .� y M N �Q O O N M UI c m C i 01 Q O O O C>> O f {n Q W 1 i 1 0 O 1 00 0 1 COO LL 1 Z 1 1 00 cc 1 000 I O M O 00000 M CD O M '-' 00000 I O M c)O M r f N N O N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 O o C O C o C N n II o 0 0 co O II� 00 O fD fD N N N 00 0 0 0 O O O O O O N N N N .� ri ri 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N N N [V ,--I ri ri ri N N •� O n Ln Ln fT N M M N N '~ ra r♦ r♦ n n n 1%1 fA IA 1%i m m 6 10 O O O O m L L W n it ra m a CL +E O O a1 u1 roL a`aM0. u WU > fid }�ocp� Q W c z 01 W 2 Q W 7 OC 4 �w L- c < 0 c O 1 C7 O > (MO C O O LU U OO ~ W N 1 w 0 0 4 0 0 O O O Z Q C C M M M U) Ul O 1 1 O CD 1 O O 1 U. 0 0 0 Offn 0 00 0 to 0l0 M W 0. O O N N N Z 00 N 286 O 0 o C o c o c "' v o a '~ r O C 0 C o C o c N .. 00 m n N M O N !:2, co 0 N co 0 N o c o c C v d `" v L v M o C � fs N E\ 0 C o C o c ri Ln .. co 0 It 00 00 0 0 0 co G if N N V Le a� C C Nrl N N N f ri wi wl 0 N IA 1 S -�T le o n N N 0 0 co to M ^S N O O S M at a% a% rT � N q M M ko %a V) O N N N r! r! r! 'T N N '1 ri M m N N N, q w, M M rl r n N N o t0 �0 to w 41+�+ IL 0 0 4� 0 4J 0 41 0 ate+ 0 4J 0 a.+ 0 4J 0 ate+ ate+ 0 0 H 0 H i~y � a >n n> i v i c C N V � m ^ z ° 7 �,n n L , G 0 41 c -' m (AN v a) v V1 -' m M Si c y v v a) Z -M 1a 7 a) = +� y CL > L p.f L J..+ y.. V E p1 —In 0 L. 0 �. fs m N E 0 0LU p1 � '+° i fA im a` via c Q :a o �'U i cl a via ro cu p a) a 9 C M di �p i C G j a co coo �p di J zv Ev) o c Q ria �ocn �. �F c z ol� Ea o �o� c Q Q a) c = O O m a) 0 — Q � c m � > > a) = U 01 a) — w a)� C Q oac7 c ��c LL M a�N 0 c O� ++ g a, e o c o Q o� a c c O '� O o '" O a of Z '� w o o '� C rmn '� o O cn Q ut 'y of o w o o '� C ,.., o Q 2 a) N O N y 0 o LL= C M O V y L i O 'G M O 0 0. 1 al O H Vl W C C M M ` N ~ O u Q 0 0 V 0 O N O O 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 OMo W V1 O 0 0 0 Oho 00 O O 00o 0 0 0 Om0 0 0 0 0000 O ri) n0Mn G Oom pM Mo uf0Min MLnLnm N O N Z M O M M M M O M M M vl N N N N N N NIf N N N M 287 N co N LO w w o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a o 0 0 0 0 - 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o 0 O O O O O O O O O O O W O u'] 0 0� O M �D O � 0)O 'i 'i O O M M , 0 tD M Q C m w IQ � _ O U 0 0 O O a M N N 00 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 p O 0 p O o 0 p O O > N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O N M o C C 0m m o p O 0 O O m No N N cc Oj 01CDO O Ln N of u1 N N 41 3 U Ny o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 p O 0 p O 0 0 p O 0 o o� o o O O o 0 O 00 00 O O O N p In In O O , O O In N a oo 0 0 0 O o 0 O 0 0 O N O O M O O r, M M u1 N OL M M P% P% �T N iE o 0 � o n m of N 00 0 O O `0 t0 t0 M 0 G1 C1 M += N N C v N^ o O N u1 P% I� n t0 N IA I% n n 01 N 'y oL rn mm � �p Ln N N ^ M M N O N N N N Ln ID N n Ln N Q In In N N 0 10 � G *i H J HLL, N O O O o 0 0 00 0 0 O O O O 00 O 000 NO O 0 O O O O O O O a o v o o q C 0 O o C 0 O q W N 3 0 0 0 0 O C, O O rn z m '� m N n N N N ^ N N N t0 w C ri w � 3 0 U Z Z) J N4+ a 00 C) 00000 0 0 00 00 00 O o 0 O 0 0 p O O Q a o v o 0 0 O o C 0 O U N 3 O O a0 0 O a O CO wl .-I N 01 01 M n n n (n N; N N N N M M 00 C .` O ri UI w o r, Ln ,.q N o O O 0) 0 0� Ln o In In W N N� It 0 N 00 coOo N m M M wl wl Ln O +3+ o ,1 M ' ' ri ' 1 CO 00 00 O 0� O N V mm N 00 ' M m " +� rl O O M PI 0; NQ v M Nko � N N N m to M N V1 y N p, V1 Vl fA V1 47 H y O E a_ O O w O O a 0 0 r- O O O >~ +�+� a) n v a�F F EF H aF F a ru Q) H F Ln V) a LnyL v o v v Q y E m V) O. d N v L. d j d Ly W N Ea, Z Q CL W0.�0. -W >• a V 0 O O 0 O Q i y L.a0i 0) VI 1 0 v 0 J 0 0 a�i 0 O {Y O a-a�oanoa ��cm >a>0. _a 4-1 >�a 2 ~ L L +' m L w L. L 47 L (6 0 0a co Q 0 OZ� p 0� OZ� i O coAS OZS D d w u m c~ i o d w m 0 + + Q 2 L. Ln m N° Q o p° m O ate+ v7 3 � d v N a�i L' v O C7 H 3 0 V C Q 0 Z J N (n C y 3 0 0) 3 C C 7 C oC � C Z Q w O1 0 0 3 Q w �, Q o o Q E o 0 v, Q Q m fa i f Q U) fa +_' am i f @ x x _E cn cn z Z U) L. O U 0 o o� .�-i 0 0 0 0 C C cm C, U C O N O C a 0 _1L. N 0 O I, Ln O 0 'U 3 m a=+ 3 N O 0) (AC Ol `� O O � x M Lnd= N CA U O 2 U Q x O = 0 O 3 rl LL O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O ORtrn �rnrnrnrnrnrn� .i O�rn Ui Mp�0rn0 M COrnrnO N M O ,i M 3 rl M M .--i .--i ri CA U N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 00 (V m 288 p .- N o o ii o ii ii c 0 O O e m cn'Q 0 Cm LU � _ U O a O G a M y N co O o 00 O < NN M ,i O O O O f O f p N N � u1 u1 L N N N _ U N d o o O 00 O < y N O 0 O O O < O f N aO O f O 0 N N f N a N o C) - ! M a1 m 00 f N 'y N of Lf1 L N H J N N Oo 00 00 O f Lu 0 wl'G o O 0 i LU N = Co M LA Lf L z N C M m f LU LU ` f1� _ 0 U Z Z) LL 4+ J N N 0 o O 00 O f Q o O O < wl'O Lu N = CO M Lf Lf L a O (n N M M f C O ri UI N fS ^ +O N N M O M rn(h M f M O ++ N ri ri + in to in i m i O O O Z F s= H F F a� 0 4+ U w i c u N o- o o C � LO C1 � a N M a =o G7 y f O cd o m 0z 0 y O L = G OU Ln >. U) N N— Q O = x < Z +� 0 0 4- O O O M N O o 00 p O O C,O Ln d J C N dl U) fUfL 00 O o o t 0 o f O O f M O O M M O O m C U N N N N 0 0 0 0 O Ln L7 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Ln Lr 0 o o o � Ln u 0 0 � o c o � `^ u 0 C N r r N 0 r .-I N 0 0 o � o c c CD p Ln . ID It Lp n o O p O -T N + f (1O O O O 14 + O 00 M Ln .. N O Ln Ln + U) u! to iA to i C O ' O O O O yH F H F F V V fro ca O O = O O C L C1 M fJ�CO Q1 " fT Ln C 47 L O 'O 4+ fu Q ca O �. V Ln �U ,p L M ` J C Q U' C M H M C O 4) O O � � C L LL (ML lD = o w O O� i1 CD o O L O L C C N L UI UI s s M ++ G 1. O LL �i O O �i �i O o 1 1 o U. 1 0 o f 1 o I i 00 o fU LA o p o 0 0 %D LO o o ts p o 0 01 0� o m O M M M L N N N It N 0 0 0 x � rnx 0 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 o O It o 00 n M W M n Ln w a' Lf M 0, N f\ 0 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 0 c oI o N coo 0 0 0 0 �c 2 N N N N m o rn t0 " N GO Ln W Ln W Ln n in in +' M m m v F F H L L Q) cL) i--iCL C O O 01 N (L` oa C Q)M V N N O Q O O C gi C +' C Q U' Z C M , m O O C O O u'1 w O O O o O O O O N C O U) > > O Z f o 0 o f coo D LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M ? M Z O LT LT LT N N N m ON W (V 289 w w (D c++ 0 - 0) o 0 o o 0 0 O O O O O o 0 o o 0 0 O O O O O O o 0 o o 0 0 O O O O O O o o o o O O O O O O ED 0) 6� O O N to 0 O O M It M M M 0 0 0 O 00 O O In O O O m m m 01 01 m 01 m Ill N IA QC CO ,M-' ,M-' ,M-' O w 0 V N 0 O O 0 a M y N > N o o o 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 o 0 O O o 0 0 O O N M �, 0 C)O 0 0 0 O O O O 00 p 0 O O O O 0 O p O 0 O O O O 00 o 0 O O O O p N N O N N N 0 0 O O CI 0 0 ( 3 6i D� N IA IA IA N ++ i0 m,--i al 41 N N N N N N N N IA IA 3 U N y Coco O O Coco O O Coco O O o 0 0 O O N O o 0 0 co 0 O O O O 0 0 o O 0 0 O O O O o 0 o co 0 O O O O p 0 0 0 O O O O Oo C C C 0r r 1 Q rl r 1 If�A O D N a pO N N N 0 IA O IA O IA O M O M O M 1AN � 1A� N iE n O M M M M Co O N O O O 0 tD I, 11 ri ri N O N N N > M � N N N o M 00 00 00 0 CD rn T IT � M m M > I, N N m m M m m m NO � tp tp tp V p IA IA IA ,D r1 ri 11 M M M N Q N O O O 0 ID ID It RT qT rI rl ri p N N N H J H r44, N 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O Coco O O 0 0 0 O O w 0 o 0 o C 0 0 O O O O 0 0 o 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 o 0 0 0 O O O O o C 0 0 O O O O ".0 W N= 00 0 00 00 00 �" 00 4 414 N C, N N N oo O O C O CO 0 N N N Ln IA IA IA Ln ,n IA N N N IA IA W N w ` 00 0 U z Z) J N4+ 0) cc 00 O O co 0 0 O O cc 00 O O 0 0 O O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 00 o 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O r\I N= 00 0 OD 00 00 �" 00 .-I rl ''I N oC N N N oD C O C a O CO It N N N M IA IA IA ,� IA N N IA IA IA (n N q le M M M rI c .` O Tq H R 00 'D M M M Ln N M M M Ln ^ `� 01 01 01 CD 0000 w GoN ID .--1 m f1 f1 RT O R O O (1) Il n ,ti O O M +� M +� M +� '1 N'T N Lr M RT M RT M p Lr O IA O IA O IA O +_+ N U N 00 00 00 S OD N N N n n n rl rl rl Q v w w w M rq ~ M ON m 0 VD VD N m m .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 10 f0 10 10 10 f0 10 10 10 70 f0 ++ O ++ O ++ O i+ O 4+ O ++ O ++ O ++ O ++ O ++ O 4+ O 4+ O Z !� n � 0 >� v G !� n v � 0 N !� � LL LN N U1 ++ L L L z �+ N 0) L L L L z ++ N N UI ++ L L L L O) z 4+ N G L. L L 0 IL a °3 °; Ii a a a a; °; Ii a a 7 p fl. a; a; Ii a R fl. a; ai O. w R H LL C C O I --I i--i L O c cn LL LL G Z C C O �-" �--� L O C d1 LL LL C C Z O '_' L O C C1 LL LL C Z O L 0 C cn z G a 'a .--i a s .N N O a .--i a L. .� I=i a '6 ,--i Q a w �-' W a 'a a s 'y "' Z N M OZJ coo O 0a G IL N M ou coo oii -O M p LL oZf ro oa 0) ate+ d 0i9 io — W 'a a O N 0 0 FLL.I m >� O m>> C LUJ G 'O >� 0 m>> C LU 0 'G >. p>> c G 0) Q>� O G w 0) — Q a� 0) O 0C 0) 0J — Q N V O F W 0) 0) _ N O � J Q 41 f0 O Q U' 0 U 10 O Q U' 0 w D 0 Q U 0 z > 41 M o Q 0 > Q H C O Q w C O ~ C O W WC OLU 0: Ol a y O o-i o 0 O O F Q CIf aZf W O0-i00 O O VI CA y O o-i o 0 O O U G Ol y 0 0 0 O O Z) UI -0 W M M M 0. VI O 00 M M oYc Q V G 0) M m ,U, O) 0) OC O' Z c m N u1 Y c rN� y a U c rNi Vl N Q c �+ M y a 0 0 0 0 p p Q Q, 0 0 0 p CD o N > 0 0 0 V' 0 0 0 CO 0 0 J' 0 0 m N IL O H O 0 p 0 O C) C)O 0 0 0 0 ~ a 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VD N N O 0 O C) C)J 0 0 0 0 0 O ' O m (140 m O MmOm000m MM , IA O iii IO iii r O (V iin in ul in in M U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 290 O O 'IT 0 0 O C o O o W a o O o C 0 0 C 0 o C ni O � v 0 0 0 � 0 0 C O O c rni 0 n Ln ri o N S 1 N N n Ln n N N v N • ti � W O Z F W V >^ p H L O IL O C16M L6 CO N U •p >" p Ln > OJ OJ — Q a) Q �COQC7�0 Z •� D 0 0 0 0 C Ul Ul D L O O O L C)O o 1000 0 0 M le IA O LLnn LLn LLn N N N N Coco O O O O O 0 Ln Ln O o O 0 O O O o O 0 O O o 0 0 0 O O 0 Co o o Co 0 oO O O O M L(i hi 11 wl wl M M M ) O O o 0 O O Coco O O Coco O O Co o o o � o o O J c O O O '� 0 N CO n Ln N N N n W O m ON Ql N .--i Ln N N N r, N N N N v't ko o M M m m N O! OD OD OD O LT n co 00 M N N nl rq rl rl rl J rJ rJ rJ 0 0 o O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 00 o o O O O O O J '-i Ln �0 % %6 W to to O O O O O O Coco O O O o 0 O O O o 0 o o o J Ln O J T� Ln OD OO OD m o o N N N It Ln M M N Ln Ln O N N N n N o Ln N N N J v m o rl rl rl " M N N N ^ M N N N J O O O O O O O O O • F F H F F F F F F te n LL`�V) n a+ y 41 (1) Ln 4" G� L. C Z 41 W v m +'Z L L WL FG•1 � >y LL n w aL i LL a) Q) Q) y LL m LL O C LL O C LL LLC O� C Z'G ui Qa LL v oC L. s Oii o cp p ' ' 0� Lo pp O ca Z OAS }o Co 0a p U > 'O i, p V) p Vn > >^ C 0 •p >" 0 Ln > C LU > d d — Q v al 7 F•1 �"� OJ OJ — Q a� p N Q (9 0 L Q C7 L Q C7 0 0 U L = V C 0 O LJ-i U m0 J C O LJ-i U O W Ccm a LLL •� w 0 0 04.. Oo�op O LLL U 'y w 0 0 0 w O LL 0 'rh w O O O� O LL' O oe i W vi W LL�OO�ap � hd w4)Oo oy LL LLJO LvNj O M IA Q Ul . -i M y LU (A ' o00 O lA a 000 0 000 LL 0 Ln • O L O o 0 0 0 B O O O W L 0 0 0 0 0 L O W 0 0 0 W O 0 0 0 0 L O W o 0 0 0 N i O u1 O M??? M Ln Ln Ln N O M ? M W � to O N N O M M ^ n n n O Ln _ N Ln Ln Ln N N N of N N Ln Ln Ln N N N N IA Ln Ln Ln N N N N N II O 291 000I O O O C Lit O � 0 o o c 0 o C o v O C Ln d Ln Ln d Q rn C O 0 o C 0 0 C 0 o c ti Ln N _ O O O O 0 O O Lf1 000; O O M Q 0 o o c 0 0 Ln 0 0 � lr N n O O O C 0 o c O O c M O Ly O C Ln r, O Q Ln M � r' M M n M n 0 0 0 0 0 C � C o c u) Ln C N Ln Ln III O C o c o � O Lc n U O c O C O c o c Ln v C c O c 11 0 co 0 N o co O n N 'T co 0 O co O kD III N O'l N O O M T N Ln Ln ko O^ M 0 0 M M ^ Ln N 0 0 N N S L M Ln N NIT M _I O -1 O -1 CD W M r, cc of of M 0i 0 o 0 O M m M m 'i O Ln Ln rl 0 O. 0 O +4 O +L O n n r ^ S - vl 00 Ln O vl vl N00 N N N co M M z y Vi fA fA to Vi fA V1 _y IA Vi LL 10 10 f6 10 10 10 f6 10 10 10 m LL i+ O i+ O N O i+ O N O i+ O i+ O i+ O N O i+ O i+ O N F F H F H F F F H F F Ui C N N V) � L L U 0 Z � N t L L N U W z Z W tj N N t L L CA N �% LU W ,W,, L L 4) G7 �' R Z LL L L N lU �- 0' i i 7 LO fU., L L N Al a �' � L 7 m U LL OL - OL c C1 LL IA W C C OL - 3 O C d1 LL LL LL C C O OL 3- O C p1 LL LL J M a 'a .--i a s 'y U a� .--i u) a a m VI (A i Vl (A W O a �% .� O L C16M m 0 v M CO fu N p1 tU U a�i M 06 CM Q) p1 tU IL p > >. LU >� cu) 0- i a W >.m p r U O wC W Q U O C L C LL v W— Q O C L C LL V M O QU� 0 N J M O QUa 0 ' N r ' L a a1 C G1 C~ O Vl O1 OQU O �~ c N LL LL m U LL LL O U Z W d o o o O a a y o CD 0 C yL o Gl O n 0 o 0 0 yL o Gl O 'G NM M M LL a v 4)� m >> N N >> 0 M y 1� 1 m Q1 +' O O N 00 a>>, Vl M +' O, O a coo' 0 z ��'000' L 0 'o' 0 o'�'oo' j 0 ,0 0 O o00oo0 o 0 0 0 L Z O 000000 o 0 0 0 0 0 c+o0 M L O 0�0000 o 0 0 0 0 a+oQ' M O O M 1 1 1 M O) O) O) W O O M M 0 0 0 M G O , O M � M Ln Ln M G Ln vl LA 0 Ln Ln Ln H 0 n n n N O ^ O N n N N N N N N Z N N N N N ^ N N N N N 292 O O O o 1 0 O 0 O O c c 1 'i rl rl ■ � rA iA i W 41 co F m F f LU m ` aE a o g o a+ C a`�aL '� u x Cd � 0 o f C i C C u LU U Ol x x O F aawio�o c e Z 7 C N N LL > > O F J C 0 O p O p O O O O M , M 0 i O M M � O D D O O O O O 9 OOOOOOOOC O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ri ri r-I r-I r-I ri ri I� O N O O O 00 00 m C - O +--i N -'I �o m 00 00 M Q N — C — C 00 D O cc M N Ln n V O o 0 0 0 0 0 o p 00 rl rl rl coo O rl 00 rl Do rl 00 O O O O M %6 16 O M M M rl rl rl ti M M M m O O O O'D O {0 rl 't rl rl N n N (+M,1 co N •--� O1 m Ln N M M N N O p) Ln N r� M 00 M rl rl N •--� 00 I� I� 00 Ol O l-4 �0 N M � � OOIOOWw-e W NN 00 00 It It 0 0 0N O 01 N M M ' O -N O Ln rl �N 00 OD CO I, N 'T 'T N O l0 O Ln Ln rl rl �O m� 00 00 M N O O O p) O 00 Ln 00 O O N m Ln O Ol o LQ N N M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 00 'O %0 t0 t0 O O p O Go 00 O of 00 00 00 al O O O m 00 M O M O V 0 0 le le N M rl N M r, rn Ln 00 O CO ^ n M M N rn N cc cc N 0 Ln M N N lc 0 0 0 1� cl� Ln r, M O O� 00 O OO CD M l0 Ln r 0 ID Ln rl m M rl rl .. 00 ice rl N N a N a) ie lL- in y iil ul in O E~ E~ H F H i L O-W N L w V1 p a O N w LL L i L Ln C C o - C al o.o °. Q C C 7 C % °. � C �m o o o� o °, o� o IL a aci uN 3 w� °•L > ca °oa = n c a 1'1 CZS coca O E i aCOL Q C o i> i, ='U c F J OS >.o cn i, aJc 3ca°u»oof L a�a,a� c c aaiai—Qa) M L (n 2 2 0 0 0 U C D C m , W ,�,, +' C Q U C _> ° ° x x c c U. O x a C o 0 x x cm o c LL C, W a y T �o °M ° y0 O > y O° NmLn a7 _ _ H M Vl 4� 0 W a C H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc:) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O J O p 0 0 0 Oc'10 oo00000 M Oo� M M M M M a OpooO O M M O o0000000 0 0 F 1"l a Ln OO Ln Ln o0 It It�t �t It It It I It RT It It 293 Z) 0) M O O M 0 0 0 00 00 O O r, O n C:)N N 0U m M V M M rl N N rLU QC M � _ U O a O 0 a M ul N N o o 0 0 0 o 0 O O 00 co 0 0 O W 00 f N> M ,_I O O 0 O Ln N NM Ln of N O O 0 O O O O O O f O f Np N N O ^ N N N l0 N W fV r,4 N n O f n f 3 U N y o 0 0 0 coo O O o 0 0 0 0 o 00W 00 f C O O o 0 0 O O O o O 0 0 O 0o O O O n O f n f N O N a O It '-" of Lf Ll O C;N lD lD l 0 0 N i0 W 00 00 N rl N N Ln L N a W W l0 N N N f rl rl N iE 't O M N O (4 a1 ff1 O O 0) 0 W O Ln N fA += rl rl O Ian Ln N 00 Ln n Ln n M e M ID� N m NO N O M f Ln L riO N a+ LrLn, 00 q1 m fh oN O N N q1 lD lD l O N M N Q 00 00 00 M M f O 'i rl H J N 0 O O O O 0 0 0 00 000 O O O ff LLN 0 a O O O LO n n O n n N O O O O O O O O OO r% f W N= m oO M -- fV N N 0 C N N Li n of UD l O W N M Cl ri N N N N N ri ^ n 00 f n f C i W L tY � 0 u Z Z) J N O) 0 0 0 0 coo O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O f U G o O Ln 0 n n n 0 0 o O O^ ^ n 1 W N= m C ~ N N N O N 4 W l a O U) N M r a ri N N N N N .� � N n 00 f n f C rl rl rl 'i rl .` O ri UI N f6 0^ 0 W Oo � OD w o Ol M W N o LA N f Ln O n Lr1 N N CO W 1 S O N OJ Lrl M ID l O +_+ N V Q M y N - N N Lf Lf1 0 O '00 O v N Ln .� O f N 00QO M 00 N q n Ln n f V1 cn y UI W V1 W Lp Ul U1 I ZNC LA� +�+ +�+ N C N 4 u w 41 a N O F N H F H V F F 0 0 H F F W i, Ln Lin j>� y U n y 'O F c0 W �, Lin T Ul +' a Vl -0i 0 ++ +.+ N Q i O L G7 OJ �+ N N ++ a fp i N J N Ol O.� C i N = E w O MW C LL 'V C 0 T� N 4; v O O�� C i U1 3 c>= to C C fl LU O v 0 L. O a+ O (A 0 LT y W C) z N o 07 v o w -0 - O o rn 0 V1 u o� LT C u � -q u 0. M C � w O1 01 Q = a C N M tr� p Co C Lu o C O J y L y r- O tai o '0 0a _ ;6 c C C ,_ Ei ,C ~ FA O ,u u •C W O) 07 Q O) o Q U' ,-, C r6 LL (n = O r O) N H 01 O m O) Q fU O Q U C rap A U C O F L : LL M F LU `O L. 01 f F ces O1 0 4-`MO 00-i0 0 LL LL CD O O LU H N _ �•--,U O0 o� O LL LLCD 470 `y O p yO) LL.g,y Z) 1"1 'G Ol M M O fU t 0 O t � 'G f6 0 r y O is y t N 0 t � ce >> � o o } o�� Rt: It o o Q, LL r 0 0 0 r coo O T O O L COO F Iy z, r O M O r O O r cc O T O O L coo L LL O O L O 0000 W O O O W O OOM M O O M J N M O O O r O O O 00 W O O O 0 0 0 f71 M O O M F O M., M M V N C)M M N N M M N N 00 O O O 0 0 L LEI 0 0 C:) C:) C)0 0 U N Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln m -� "0 d N O r� C M Ln O c Ln Ln N r m u 0 00 P o 0 O C Ln 0 0 o C o C o C O C Ln rn O N Ln i l0 N O ro � rl 10 Ln 41 N O Ln > F o O a�-q °u'a � M C 7 i � C Q C7 ,� C O O O 000'� I y M O O y r UI •--, •--, N Ul r 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 1 O M , M M M M 1 0 O O O 1 Ln Ln Ln 294 I O O I D D O O { N r-I j 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 00 O O 00 0 00 O O 00 O O 0 O 00 O O 0 O O O L O O O O v 0 0 �0 W v IA N N I 0 0 O O - O 0z 0z `� I j O a i I i 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 00 O O 0 o 0 00 O O 0 0 O O 0 O 00 O O 0 a 00 O O I o O O O 'T RT o O � IT Ln IA O N N 1 - O O O 0 O O O LA Iff LA � LA n �T n I p N O N O N O 0 o O It le M n o-e o O ID 0 Ln � M 00 r1 r1 0 0 O O Ln Ol O O O O N co O O Lr LA v v N Lrl N N N tv'L IA O I 10 N v M Ln N N 1 N r�i M r�i P'1 ^ LA n n n i 0 0 0 O O coo O 00 O O co 0 00 O O 00 O O 0 O 00 O O 0 O 00 O O i C O O o 00 co C O co O 0 O C O O O Ln O O O O O O O " rl uI LA M LA O O p 'i 'i ri M O O O jr1 rl rl i I 1 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 00 0 O O 0 0 0 p 00 o 0 o O o 0 O 00 O o 0 O 0 00 O i o O o 00 OD C O O 00 0 o C:� O O O Ln O O O 0 O O C7 " rl N LA LO 6 M LA O O p 'i 'i 'i j M O O O 1 f m 0 6t n n o o N p 0 N N ^ Ln LO o 0 RT RT S N o N LO LO m --1 0 0% 0 O Ol Ol - 0 O N N ,-L M M O o Ol N N N O n n 0 O 00 00 " m 00 ^„ n 0 0 LA q q N N N N 01 01 01 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 u n ++ 10 ++ m ++ LD to ++ ID a+ 10 4+ m +/ Z m ++ ID a+ ID 10 a+ a+ r, O O m H O F O F N O I_ F O to H O F O F Q O F O H O O F F. ` rn Ln Ln ' Ln ji n � (A y V z N 4) U L O) Z L �' �' O L N_ 0) Lc 0) Z (,vi N 4) 0) Q L. m a,Ya LyL D OQ aO �3 O o O LL. LN O U3= p O W O O UfU u � Za (L -0 -q �L3c LL Ou cc a oS uo c Z mQL. a� cL� � vJaai� Z Z ZZ$ aa'm� a Z 0-D Q ¢ ,� = a >Z a�da,�, + aD W� m = � O � Z Z= 0_ = {L1L O N a ay000 ^0)0 Wya0-L00 y O1=aID z N �D O t O J y O O y s to C W 0 W>> O 0 1 0 0 1 CD 00 Y in i i i Z, I 0 0 0 1 0 00 l 0 , I 0 0 1 l 0 a O O O O LY Q '~ 000 O W o o O W 00M O o O 00000 O Woo 00o moo a MMMM a 4OM���M MGM COMOOM MOM Vl 00 OO 000 0 %00 io�o �o , Ln U) M Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln n r, r, r 295 Ln m (V M z , /ri § \� § ]o 2 ` � | e � z §�i < �] § §o z m- \ Li ® m . m (0 0 0 0\ a 2 0 ■ ao ' ■ �20 f(A k w0 2wo e 41 c z C . � k x 2 § §20,0 2 ce / v�o\o .otSo� _om&m �o / j{ M| 11 \� 0 \ �i �i Li ® . . . (0 0 0 j- 4# 2 7L. 7C f § L. `06 a / a $ z a a 2 § m 2 z 2 w 2 g x x a § LU 0 0 En o t 2 2 3 U a «. ao�/o / �§mfm Q e q J 296 CITY OF LA QUINTA SPECIAL FUND REVENUE NOTES FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET REVENUE NOTES REVENUE NOTES BY FUND NUMBER — 201 Gas Tax Fund This fund includes both Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation Account (RMRA, also known as SB1) Revenues. The projections are provided by the State and have largely recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic; current estimates show total local streets and roads allocations will grow by 11%. While fuel consumption may remain flat overall, annual cost of living adjustments will help to maintain revenues. Streets and Highways Code Sections 2103-2108 HUTA are allocated to counties and cities based on designated allotments and population. Each May and January, the State provides revised projections and the City adjusts revenue projections accordingly. • Section 2105 allocates 11.5 percent of tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon monthly among cities based on population. • Section 2106 revenues equal to 1.04 cent per gallon are allocated to the State Bicycle Transportation Account (7.2 million per year), $400 per month to each City, $800 per month to each County, and the residual amount is allocated to cities and counties based on registered vehicles and population. • Section 2107 provides monthly allocations to cities of 1.315 cents per gallon of gasoline, 1.8 cents per gallon of diesel, and 2.59 cents per liquefied petroleum gas allocated based on population. • Section 2107.5 is residual revenue remaining after Sections 2103 - 2107 are allocated to cities annually in July based on population ranges. A range of 25,000 to 49,999 residents receives $6,000. • After State transportation debt service is paid, 44% of the remaining excise taxes are evenly split between cities and counties using the current HUTA formulas. Section 2103 funds are allocated to cities on a per capita basis. • This revenue source is derived from the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall). On July 1, 2020, and every July 1 thereafter, the gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax rates and vehicle registration taxes will be increasing by the change in the California Consumer Price Index. SB1 funds are subject to a special annual audit and a minimum annual maintenance of effort contribution for road improvements paid from the General Fund, which is $1,786,109. 202 Library and Museum Fund operational revenues are derived from property taxes, which are used to support activities of the Library, Museum, and MakerSpace. All operations are now fully operational, and we are expected to resume pre -pandemic projections. 203 Public Safety Fund transfers in during FY 2021/22 are derived from Measure G Sales Taxes. There are no proposed transfers in for 2022/23. 210 Federal Assistance Fund revenues are derived from federal allocations for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG); 15% can be used for public service projects and 85% for public improvement or housing services. 212 SLESA COPS Fund revenues are derived from the State of California and are received for law enforcement activities of the Riverside County's Sheriff's Department, also know as Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Activities (SLESA). 215 Lighting and Landscape Fund assessments are based on an annual assessment rate of $35.60 per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU, which is generally one EBU per Single Family Residence parcel), which was established in 1997 and remains unchanged. The district was formed pursuant to the 1972 Act, which permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing for the maintenance of certain public improvements. Changes to the assessment rate are bound by Proposition 218 regulations. Each year the assessment information is submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included in property tax rolls. The Fund is largely supported by the General Fund with transfer in contributions for operational expenses. 15 297 CITY OF LA QUINTA SPECIAL FUND REVENUE NOTES FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET 220 Quimby Fund fees are established under Government Code Section 66477 which predates the Mitigation Fee Act and authorizes a city or county to require dedication of land, payment of fees in - lieu of dedication, or a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes as a condition of approval of a residential subdivisions. These fees were last updated on February 2, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020 and an adjustment on July 1, 2021. 221 AB 939 CalRecycle Fund is used to account for franchise fees collected from the city waste hauler that are used to reduce waste sent to landfills through recycling efforts. The City has a Franchise Agreement with Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC effective July 2022 through June 2037. 223 Measure A Fund Revenue received is derived from a half -cent sales tax first passed by voters in 1988 and extended by vote in 2002 to continue to fund transportation improvements through 2039. Funds are distributed proportionately to three geographic areas based on the sales tax collected within each. In the Coachella Valley, 50% goes to Highways & Regional Arterials, 35% to Local Streets & Roads, and 15% to Public Transit. 225 Infrastructure Fund is being phased out and not subject to collection of future revenue from developments. 226 Emergency Management Performance Fund revenues are received from the State Homeland Security Grant Program to local governments to assist to further the State of California's efforts to prepare for natural and man-made disasters and terrorism related impacts to communities. 227 State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP) Fund revenue and expenditures are recognized when grants are awarded. Funds are received from the State Homeland Security Grant Program to local governments to assist to further the State of California's efforts to prepare for natural and man-made disasters and terrorism related impacts to communities. 230 CASp, AB 1379 Fund SB 1186 revenue is derived from a $4 per business license renewal fee and its purpose is to increase disability access and compliance with construction -related accessibility requirements at businesses and facilities that are open to the public. The fee is divided between the City, which retains 90 percent, and the Division of the State Architect (DSA), which receives 10 percent. 235 South Coast Air Quality Fund revenues recognize contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Uses are limited to the reduction and control of airborne pollutants. 241 Housing Authority Fund Second Silent Trust Deed Payments and Home/Land Sale Proceeds vary from year-to-year. In FY 20/21, The City purchased property at Dune Palms Road for the X-Park project, drainage improvements, and future affordable housing. 243 RDA Low -Mod Housing Fund The total 2022/23 former Redevelopment Agency loan repayment is $3,369,682; as required under Redevelopment dissolution 20% or $673,936 will be recognized in reserves within this Housing Fund. 247 Economic Development Fund revenues can be used for future economic development. As a response to COVID-19 unprecedented challenges, on March 25, 2020, the City Council authorized the appropriation of up to $1.5 million from the City's Economic Disaster Reserves to establish an Emergency Economic Relief Loan Program for Small Businesses (Program). The Program provided a total of 51 zero percent interest loans of up to $20,000 to small businesses for emergency cash flow during the health crisis. Repayment of the principal amount will become due and payable to the City in equal monthly installment payments for a period of two years pursuant to repayment schedules; YTD activity in FY 2021/22 reflects payments made. 249 Successor Agency (SA) 2011 Low/Mod Bond Fund was used for the acquisition of the vacant property located between the Pavilion at La Quinta Shopping Center and the La Quinta Valley 16 298 CITY OF LA QUINTA SPECIAL FUND REVENUE NOTES FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET Plaza Shopping Center on Highway 111 to further the City's goals of fostering mixed -use development, affordable housing, multi -modal transportation, and development of the Highway 111 Corridor as outlined in the General Plan 2035. Remaining bond funds continue to earn interest and are available for future housing projects. 250 Transportation Fees Fund are dependent upon new development. California Complete Streets Act requires local governments in the state to address the transportation needs of all users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders. These fees were last updated on February 2, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020 and an adjustment on July 1, 2021. 251 Park and Recreation DIF Fund fees are dependent upon new residential development. Impact fees for parkland acquisition apply to residential projects not involving a subdivision, and impact fees for construction of park improvements apply to all residential development projects. Fees collected are used to provide additional parks to mitigate the impact of new development in the City. These fees were last updated on February 2, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020 and an adjustment on July 1, 2021. 252 Civic Center DIF Fund fees are dependent upon new development. The purpose of the impact fee is to pay for new development' s proportionate share of the cost of providing Civic Center facilities to serve residents and businesses in La Quinta. Impact fees will be used to pay for future expansion of the Civic Center Campus. These fees were last updated on February 2, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020 and an adjustment on July 1, 2021. 253 Library DIF Fund fees are dependent upon new residential development. Impact fees are collected for the La Quinta Library, which is owned by the City of La Quinta and operated by the Riverside County Library System. These fees were last updated on February 2, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020 and an adjustment on July 1, 2021. 254 Community and Cultural Center DIF Fund fees are dependent upon new residential development. This fee was formerly known as the Community Centers impact fee. In 2020, the scope of the fee was broadened to include cultural facilities such as the La Quinta Museum. These fees were last updated on February 2, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020 and an adjustment on July 1, 2021. 255 Street Facility DIF Fund fees were dependent upon new development. An updated DIF Study was adopted on February 4, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020. The updated DIF Study phased out the Street Facility DIF and the Park Facility DIF and replaced these fees with one Maintenance Facilities DIF fee. 256 Park Facility DIF Fund fees were dependent upon new development. An updated DIF Study was adopted on February 4, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020. The updated DIF Study phased out the Street Facility DIF and the Park Facility DIF and replaced these fees with one Maintenance Facilities DIF fee. 257 Fire Facility DIF Fund fees are dependent upon new development. The City contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department for fire protection, fire prevention, rescue, Fire Marshall and medical emergency services. The City builds and owns the fire stations in La Quinta. Those stations are part of an integrated system of fire protection facilities used by the Riverside County Fire Department to provide fire protection to La Quinta and surrounding communities, including unincorporated portions of the County. There are three existing fire stations in the City and preliminary plans call for a fourth fire station to be constructed in or near the southeastern quadrant of La Quinta. That station will be needed to provide an acceptable level of service to development in that part of the City and in portions of unincorporated Riverside County. These fees were last updated on February 2, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020 and an adjustment on July 1, 2021. 259 Maintenance Facilities Fund was created in FY 2020/21 after the updated DIF Study was adopted on February 4, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020. The updated DIF Study phased out the Street Facility DIF and the Park Facility DIF and replaced these fees with one Maintenance 17 299 CITY OF LA QUINTA SPECIAL FUND REVENUE NOTES FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET Facilities DIF fee. Fees are dependent upon new development and are used for the corporate yard maintenance facilities and equipment needed to serve future development in La Quinta. 270 Art in Public Places Fund transfers in are from the General Fund for operational expenses. Fees are dependent upon new development. These fees require a separate study from other development impact fees. 275 LQ Public Safety Officer Fund transfers in are from the General Fund. Annual transfer in from General Fund; distributed to public safety officers disabled or killed in the line of duty. 310 LQ Finance Authority Debt Service Fund is used to account for the debt service that will be used for the principal and interest payments of the Financing Authority's outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. The 1996 Civic Center Bond was paid off in October 2018, resulting in savings to the General Fund. An annual State Controller's Report and audit are required. 401 Capital Improvement Programs Fund has large variances annually because of multi -year project carryovers. A listing of 2022/23 projects is presented within the Capital Improvement Fund expenditures. 501, 502, 503, and 504 Internal Services Funds in which revenues are largely derived from the General Fund based on employee and equipment allocations by division. 760 Supplemental Pension Plan Fund transfers in are from the General Fund. 761 Supplemental Pension Plan Fund The City participates in the California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) for the purpose of accumulating funding for OPEB obligations. The CERBT is a Section 115 Trust and is an agent multiple employer plan for those electing to prefund OPEB obligations. Revenues in this fund can come from earnings on the portfolio or additional contribution transfers in from the General Fund 762 Pension Trust Fund In 2019, the City established a Section 115 Trust Agreement with U.S. Bank National Association and Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS), Trust Administrator. The Section 115 Trust was established to set aside monies to fund the City's pension obligations. Contributions to the Section 115 Trust are irrevocable, the assets provide benefits to plan members, and the assets are protected from creditors of the City. The purpose of the Trust is to address the City's pension obligations by accumulating assets to reduce the net pension liability. Revenues in this fund can come from earnings on the portfolio or additional contribution transfers in from the General Fund 18 300 a) 01( c( 1 fa , w V a l9 Z) o CD w a r 'n >r O M r a Nr a N f M j N � N N O }N LL N N Z N . N G N '( f f ( f C N a O { N e L F w N + U) N f z \ ( w ri 1 a N X O w N f � f Z , Z LL w N f U1 D f � ri •f C6 C 0 � N � ( J ri { N j O r N i O N �o00000000o t( 0 ooi d M N c w o O O o o o O O o u � %0 0 0 o O 0 c O� n o O w N r 00 ,--ICD tmcD M 07 N O l0 f( l0 m m N O M n O M d co M i0 . n M N O N goo �a 0 0 0 0 o N CO 0 O O a -i O O O 0 o c 0 0 0 c N O M u - O N n N O O O O O c 0 0 0 0 O C 0 0 Ln O o u .--i O Ib N N n O M V rn M O r,It00o " 00 O ! CO � '" u I N 'I, 0 o o o o a o O O O O O o po Li] r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O � M u n O O o o o o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O o n o 0 o u N M 0) O O O M O) r O O Ln r cn Ln a Il r 0 0 1 O I O 0 M O r, M Ln �o O O O 0 0 0 Ln O N O N coo O 0 O O O Ln N O M M -I co N It f'n Oi Ln 0 c it c c r c r c c u r �- 1P 1mmmmmmW--]1" 1 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 o p 00 O O O p O O p o k0 o o 0 0 o f0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O O O O p O O O O O O O I O rlrl0) l0 N p W O N O O p O O M 0 0 0 Ln O M O O O p S O n Ln 0% O l0 N N O Ln .-, O Ln O Ln O 1 W .--I O M M rN-I rl -1 I Ln 00a0 in 1 i I rn I O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O p O O O O O O p 00 Coco coo 0 k0 O O 0 0 0 VD 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 p O p i O� n n 0) l0 N p CC O N O O p O O Ln 0 0 0 0 Ln O M O O p S O n Ln m O to (-4 N O Ln Ln Ln O Ln S 00.--I M M O N M .--I f0 ri O 00 N 00~ wl f 1 O Ln O O O) OO M n O N Ln N N O Ln O p 0) O (Y) O Ln Ln Ln S l0 N't O M M M O O i0 ffl 00IT't T IDN N 01 ID01 M W^ It 00 000 Ln M 00 S •� O t0 n M l0 w N Ln O IT N N Ln N m Ln Ln M Ol Rt Ln M a7 O ri O ti ff ON N ti ti ti ri l0 �` ri^ v co 00 ri O m M N .--I M ti ri Ip f0 J fa .+��+ ' j C f0 IC f0 +N.i m T` O �, O v v 0 � O O v O U _ In H � H f0 Ln V N aJ H, fu y LL6 .� Vl = W i 'a i y O_ Vl a=i VI N FA Cz LL O i C O a) Ln OL y>, w CO O • V O a W U) cp { j Lq a=+ N •��-, i y {'L +i +' +�+ C O Ln U u fU v 41 Ln o L i U) Z u m al }, i a.+ a7 w a�i o U � a1 m a o o (A N m N j 7 k O C LOo U �_ O io O H ry fU u0i +T+ O U U C 'E IL O ,: 0 C L. W .L L m W W a1 Q) U) 'a .O C '-' IS L .O U_ C +' +� O M L a) C U C O }' 'f0 f6 (n m L. QY c U C � U L f>?i v +� a) .- Q al L. Ln U fa {0 H .- ++ w N fll w O O O 0 f6 O m N W it Q fu i fu m N O }i ru a) O = 7 O O V 0acn fU �JU r- 0-V) O O02:ii 222: 0 C U (7 w� aI LL coces a � M L U a K V 0 OM O N N N N N OM It (A .--i .--i .--i N O ON N to to to 0) fu W O {D O O O fC ON CD 00 L•L •--� •--� N N N N N N N N .--i .--i .--i .--i .--i {C +' IT M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f C 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,= S O m J Ll) Ll) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln L!) L!) L!] N p l0 l0 w w w •f6 l0 w 0 0 to to M 4 � 'p y;, l0 l0 l0 m n n J f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f O f coo 00 f O O M M M M M M M M M M O M M M M M N M M M M M M N M O M M M O0 Ln M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 301 N \a ri N a N e L F w N + U1 N z \1 w 14 Z a N X p 0 w N f 0 � Z � Z LL w N f Ln rq D 1 � ri 1 0 0 N i m ' J ri L N j O r N i O N 1 0 0 0 0 p r 000.-I� i N it ;I 0000 C JI , O C M O O O O D C C) rr) 0 0 0 � � c o rn D O C N _ O O OO OO OO O 0 1n 0 0 0 o C N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o C o u f O n I 0 O D D G n Ln O i CV 0 0 0 C 00 C o Ln u N O OO OO O 0 0 0 0 D D n D 9 1 0 o 0 o p 0 O o 0 0 o p o 0 0 o 0 o p 00 Coco o 0 0 o 0 00 O 0 0 0 o p p o 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 o p Ln o o 0 of Lf 1 M lc n M O Ln C O 01W Ln , O O Ln O O O 0 O Ln nI. N .--i C Ci 0 S M't O N Ln M N N Ln Ln Ln N. 1 M fb 't 0 IA N N M ri N Ln N i M N M 1 1 1 Ln O Ln Ln N ID Ln Ln (a) CD N CD Ln 0 0 .--� O O CD ^'t Ln N CD CD CD N N N aD r, Ln N N r\ w M kD Ln CO Ln O M Ln O W lD O O O O Ln N M Cl " Or, ,y N "R O Ln Ln M OC O ,y a O M M M O Ln Ln m O O as m M W O M frI O. lD N .--i lD M N N N .--i n lD O n N N M O IN 1 1 o 0 0 o p p o 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 o p o p 0000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 p to 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 p Ln 0 0 o N O p Ln i M llln M Ch N C .--i fb W Ln N O O Ln o C 0 u1 O O n^ +--i 0 C C W, o p LIM i M'Zl- 01- N 01 Ln N N N M .--i O Ln .--i Ln N N N .--i N M W'T O Y1 Ln 1!1 ri 1 M m ,_y ri N Ln wl N Ln n O N wl M N N O N N M i I o N j O o 0 o p p O O O O O p o 0 0 o 0 0 p 00 O O O p 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 o C)0 W C)o 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 C)Ln o 0 0 LnO C)Ln 1 M lD n M N Ln .--i 011 W Ln N O O Ln o 0 0 w O O n N .--i O O O W, C 0 O S M O N Ln N N N M Ln Ln - Ln ^ N N ,A M W It O ,n Ln ui 1 lA N ri N N � r\ 00 j N ri N lA 00 wl N N 1 O O O O p M O O N Lb Ln M .--i O O O n .--i wl 00 .--i M n.1 Coco O o p Ln S O O O O p O O M .-- O Ln .--i O M n n p N N ID O N E O O O p p S n O M 1-1 N O tT J Ln n � � Ln .ti Ln � r, M M Ln " fT O 1-1 O O N p` Ln .--i co l0 ,--i n N l wl rn O M 74 N O Ln N M ri 'Lp Eu U fA V1 Vl u a-+ y (A V1 'Lp Eu 0) fA (% U C w Om m M U� w O a+ m 06 OO O O O n O U O O v� nfu Q H C F a) - 6 F F F U a) L L y Ln u al �, N 4E� CDO to !n 'v L • i y a1 fA a +I +' Vl O U a) L L (A Ln O ++ O •E a) N I_ >_ C OI l0 U LO ,; O N a fs cn LL- w W Vi 'Z, a) }' fo .� a) H 01 O aJ 01 n U- C 10 O U OL Q C +, Ln O C Ln a7 D + — I 01 U L� C L. C N (A S C 025 O V J O OL I °� W f6 L. C1 C1 (6 iC C O i "" (6 O V O w V U •i O O. CL w aTI O V i 6 y E U yl +T 41 al Ul O U U +� a X N O f0 O ,p C L L L lD i 6 a7 E w C N— a) 0 O ,i O U _C c V w+ +� aZS N a) � Q� t f1 fv lD N— a) L ,V V 0-- 10 O IOU J f1 W I� M J d (n O CO a v U O LL 2 V U D N f+>'Oo W> O i �O L a) J f1 LU �C-I a., fu F O l M VI V C O 0. l (A 01 A7 N M V O 3 V Ln N Ln lD M 0 N O V Ln N C W Ln f --1 0 0 m N M V O a1 O L OD 00 00 .--I O r-I r-I r-I rN-I {D +' rN-1 lD lD lD l4 +' g- ++ O N OM L .--1 U) M a7 O +' 3= O O O O O O O O O O O O ,� t O ,- 'y a7 O +' 01 C O� Ol Ol Ol FC,, � � � � 00 lD lfl lfl lD m lD lD 0 0 0 0 m lD O lD lD tD C Ol Ol Ol Ol FO,, M M N 1 V lD lD lD lD lD ` lD 1p 1p 1p 1p <D L lD O lD lD lD F•L 1p 1p 1p 1p 1 � l� Coco O O O O O O 100000 �D , 0 0 0 O O O N l 0 , 0 O O %D 0 0 0 0 O w , O O M M M M �D I OOMMMMM p %D I M M M M M M N O I M I M M M 10 I M M M M 10 I M 0 I N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N O N 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N O N 302 0 0 M O 0 Ic 0c oc Lnu 0 o c rn 0 p ,n 0 c 00 tll 0 0 g O O C 0 Ol c o Q 0 O 0 I� rn ,n M N O N Cl) O% -1 W O U1 W RT � w "� M M N 00 M- 00 0 0 M M N i0 i Ln of ~ rl ~ rl DD Iff i t0 �0 n 1 of i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o o 0 0 I - Ln ID 0 0 ID N ko Ln u1 00 rl Ln If1 rl N �0 ri OD M 1 � i I 1 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0^ oN 00 0o 1 N O C O N N 00 Oi 00 '" rl Ln of of lfl 1 0 w ip N o N o M 0 O u) M S O M o O � V 00 00 UG It It ^ N N O Ln Iff ~ rl ^ 00 r t0 t0 N IA V) y y� N IA IA C f H V_ H F _aF F F v V) p_ N 07 y c Q ._ c O v U L4 6 0) W G c Z c O Q) O a x ,o c w ta O LL o i o au)ufu M L w m a�mLn` al u c _�W aS aa) LC m a f L. O- U W U) L ++ C ._ - � C +� f0 c W C V O ro '� O c� a) 0 W O i Oz N 0a U�) U V U C 01p� m ce N u C IU0 i a Uf U c c S L >< V oZS cIT 06 Y o� c =�� M 4 a �� c mmx wc mU U� m oo 0 oo' N o Ln o 00 O 0 O M M 0 � M M N � %D M 10 T M '0M N O N N M 0 0 N N 0 0 N O N O N N N N N N N N 303 F- z_ (Y g LL O r U V) C 0 4� L Q 0 L 41 a-+ U V) c V) LL U U iL o L() O - E Q Q U V N 7 L Q O U)O a) M U m a) aw U) E E E O E U o U o \ E O O O00 O I��0U Ql (n O V (6 %` OJ N C m L f6 C: C: 0 2: Q (0 (n VI u) U V V (UJ C L L L. D V N O V) O N U U U ( 6 L D D D EEE.� E E E E 000-0 U U U Q 0000 Ln000 -ANNN J-� V w fu J 0 LL L L UJ u U M C 0 U N N O O N (n Ec (u M 0) C O O Q� O VI L L Qj Qj 0 L L ; J O 0 M N N 304 a) 01( C 1 10 , w V a l9 p o Z) CD p w th r U') >r O M r a Nr a N f M j N � N N O }N LL N N Z N . N � O N R N * ri N a O{ N e L F N � N U) ri U) O Z N 1 w r X ' w ' p C Z Z) N + LL X �� Z N U) O < N It ri N j oa N i O N H Z_ Z) a g LL O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O M O -1 0 0 0 OJ 0 0 0 tD O O O O r Ln o r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C rn 00 kc� N o00 0 0 e C W M O O o a O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C � 0 0 L' 000 m om o 0 00 e 0 r; ni r; o o rl)N r o o r co.--i M N .--i Ln r M Lp N It M It O r, 0) N Ln Ln N IT It m N m m N lD N M n M lD N m .--I m Ln IT tD It M r, M N M N LT Lp r, Ln 1-1 0 rl� r-� .--ti Lr r- fh .--i lq� .ti 0 000000000008809 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 W N r, 1.0 O It . O-t O N 000000000009800 0000 00 0 W N r, 1.0 O N M O M O O M r, 0) It Ln 0 0 r, O W .--i N rl � N M lb oo rl lfl D m O N N Ln .--� M (n M N M It• O .--i 1-1 . CT v Lr v io - io - o v Ln rl N N .--I N o o C) C) C ter_ 0 o C O 0 C m o d ri o r N _ O b a CD CDC rV � Ly M _. O o C O O C M O Ly m o n N _ O O C 0 0 C M o r m o r N o r� O 00 a N N d ri o n M 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O .-I N O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 O (::o 0 0 0 0 0 ID Ln O O o Ln Ln M . r N M .--i m M N C)�D Cli Mll� ll: O O W n N N co N O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln O O O Ln Ln N M -- -qj- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 o 0 0 o Ln Ln O O O Ln Ln N M -- 't W Ln M O) M co I-i N Ln m m r` r` m O N N lD .-i Ln O ID . O Ln m r\ o � 0 o I 0 O C O C r r I rn N r Ln Lr a 0 O o C 0 0 C O O C 00 C N 0 alM co o c O O C o O c n 0 O uC M O O lD N Ln rl O O O O 0 O O Ln o N coo 00 O O Ln O N .ti U i1 fA V) fA V) y� y 00 V O N _ a) H N O V H Ln O H Ln O v - E O C EL F 21 � U, i r6 lu C Ln 0- +� +� W - (n 0) V O a Ln O ' ++ N w w y LL > a� o Leo L U p E t t —� 5 o Z � v -W _ > C O O E a 6 E U u u L aci y i 6 m c Ln v' a i N ++ O oL a W N O aT+ N a) La m Nov-0-0uu� Ln��U)U)o� Vl yLA O O to 01 L Ln O a��c�� �JpEa U' O k ru '� -O -O 00 f6 f6 O- V O O IEEE:LU t CO fo faN La ate-+ w a) �_ a1 w O O O a) Vl w 10 ,� yL_, ++ a) i w a1 C t6 t6 Q M .M C U l0 N y�j •- _ R C 6 O � 0- V) U) U) O 0_ 2 p J J � U) U) 0_ U) O U U) m Q D_ U) � V w a fl. w 0' 2 Z � L � rn V C C V LL IC '� .--i Ln tD r\ O O .--i N M V Ln O O .--i .--i 10 V M .--i ' m C r, co LT O -1 M N O C y .--i lL ,--i .--i O ' co iC a) 0 0 0 0 Ln O N N N N N M Ln rn M O O N N N M M M r, m� +" IT IT IT IT IT lD lD a) O ++ m O O ib �= ^- H m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' COO = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a..i N 0 o o�o� �o �o �o �o 0 o���'C La� mar; Lb M' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' o o ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' ' 0 ' o 0 0 L 00Nr,r,r,r,r,r,r,r,r,r,P,N `N Or,r, Nr,r,r,rlrlr,r,N fir` �r,r,r, 0Ln O10 O O O O^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 305 Ln O M m N C= 3 N M O Lr) 1A O O H t w V m (.9 M o Z) CD p w N N > N O O O N N N N N N N U1 0 M 14 o 0 lO N do0 0 M M a0 N N �y m Ln IA � DD l0 n n O O N .a ^ ... I, N N M L N L N = (i N 0 }N L� N O cc 0 N.O 0 0 O o rn m N N N N M M N= co � c0 O n n O y N N O O a` N* O Ln N kD tO Ol Ol vl N 00 N N w w ri M N Q M N N rl rl N y 0 0 O M M M M 'O O00 ` 1 N N t�0 t�0 ," w N = Ln Ln o 00 U) O CO N N 0 O 07 07 Z N C N n m (M w r X w 7 p U Z Z) LL N N coo cc O O Q O 0 0 U) ^ 0 IOA IOA ,�� H N= Ni .-I 00 11 I, n Ul O m O N .;I- N ^ 00 O O < N IA n O O C N N ri N N m ++ 0 o O ID N 00 00 00 M M -1 -1 -e -e O ri o 01 O a M O N 01 m m N N N N rl rl 0) fo i � 10 10 10 f0 LO O O O U F H F F F U) U � 41 = N 0 t O i +&i L. LL m 0 s+ o6 V iw X v E +� u C M F O ro CLL y OAF C7 < 01 i j O y m r°�m c � g � � O cc Ol 0 cc O 0 0 O O O U N N N O M v N 306 O — — M L L L O >>O L L 7 aJ aJ aJ _ V V V LL fa m m 41 C C C C' .� .@ m C Z �• coo LL_._._._ —q 1-1 ri ra) C a) L O- 70 C (6 70 C f6 L O Q aJ M V) El a) a) C U) n3 m M Q 7 Ol C Q V) 4- m (a) 70 3 4 A ro LA J-� O U C i Q _N L Q L E O O u Ln >� (0 = i fLu aJ 0) C M ru U) +J aJ ro L Q a� Q to 7 a'' to V Q) V O � L � Q L Q) a ro O ,1 a Q) 'n3 � E C 3 O a ►7 O 0) L >fu a) Ll Ln 4.1 a)a) C a) O a I --I Ln E fa a C 0 a 0 M LO N 307 a) 01( c 1 10 , w V a C9 p o Z) t0 p w th r Ln > r O M r a Nr a N f M j N L N N O }N LL N N . N 0 0 N R N * N \a N a O{ N e V W Lu N a a N 14 w ' Z p C 0 Z) N ; LL W ' a ' V V) p N Z N Q � Z p N Z O � Q N U z 2 C7 J ri { N j O r N� O N -0�D-0 0-0 -0 D D D O O O O O O O D M O M W O N tb 0 0 0 0� O O K N ,.o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o q Im C)O N 0 0 0 r d Lr) 00 u 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o q M'1t O o N o o O O O r Lr) N Ln Ln Itri ko r.; r q m N r\ .--I O m M O m r\ m m O to Ln 0\ O M N. Ln N m O M m N to rn N Ln o r, rn Ln Ln CO o m r 1D .--i Lr) M M k0 N N D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0� m m O m .--i M N d r\ O Lr1 N .--i to N r ti � O OL O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0) r\ l0 Lr) N .--i to N r r, q N O '7 O Ln -zi- r\ m T Ln O y u Ln Ln M m N r-I Ln Ln O T o l0 CD N m M M m O. r\ .--i m G .--i m O r- m N d 0 o o o 0 0 0 O 0 N Lr) ,-i m O O O O C 0 o 0 o C 0 0 0 o C Lr) Lr) Lr) Lr) rn _ C:, T Lr, o" o Moo a Ln N m r\ r r\ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O M o to O M Lr) N m ko N Coco 0 0 0 0 O O M O Lo O M Ln r\ m to r, Om(:'o n ono-mr o r` 1 r` C Ln IT IT Ln C u r\ _. O O O O O O O D D G OOOOOOOOOC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01C SEES0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C Ln O O o 0 Ln o 0 o C o o a Ln m (N to M N O to m C r, lD Lr) �t 0) . m m Lr) D Ln rn 'i m O M M M CO u C) Lr v Ln -� Ln u SEES0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C Ln c 0 0 0 Lrl o o O C Ln O N O N m� O D 0 o ty Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C Ln C 0 0 0 Lr1 O o O C Ln O N O N m� O D o O n Lr) O r\ N 0) N M O N O C O +--i M .-I n r\ kot- N d ti Cl r\ rl' r, Ln Oi M O d v o m r, ko u M O N N O DO DO 0 O o-- 0 O O O N 0^ O +{ 00 O M 0 0 o O 0 0 O {0 00 O O O O m OJ O N o o r N M N CD Ln u O r\ r (11 Lrd N Ln a It N D i n r V n 0 i 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O o O N +--i M Ln Ln O r\ 1- N M 0 Ln mal in M N N coo 0 0 0 O O O Ln Ln O r\ M O N 0 o C 0 o C N +--i ry r\ 'T r Lr) M _ O O C O O C N "o at `o 0� Lr Ln N 7 r n V V D r D i 7 V N {A ra IA fB fA N V Z L N \C / Q, N Z L� f6 N 41 i-+ O N C _ ~ LL E +� C O 0 H N p 0 F C O O U 'F F F C N H f0 0 V N N N (7 H cfo J~ V1 f6 O, > m _ a1 +� y � i Ln O, Vi ' N O1 = u c u ++ Z cf C C �_ a w > C o o �7 c C a +� C a� c O 'C a w a a� L\ 0 a) + 0 co i_ ( O (U al v Of c LL > a) Q d C fL6 L� p E t C ,m U 2i i i 7 O_ U ++ , N Q +� C O O E >, C LCj, = m E U V a) Ln LL6 C N� y M (n i O C7 N (� .0 N C L ' C m O LL t U V U W Q) > O J_+ i--i C lV L (CD � CO Lf) f6U) fo OL 0 (n a C Ln Ur l/1 6 Ln f6 ai I I i J-.i l V (A o U U V c ra ~ v- c a7 .� Ln u 'p O fo °1 +� O L CL __ L �0 y E 4 u c `— Z C E m C C -p 0 0 i .� 10 m CO V fn N 10 � L. � > a, v E � Q u 0 {o u_ '� � J Q J N f0 � ate-+ W a) �_ N w 0 0 Ln J d (n (n O d i p J J N 'O 0 ffo Q U J (n O � � � f6 O t6 C fo U O Ln N d V _N _N f0 W W � U. H LL La m IQ y U m R i0 C C1 C 10 V N V N M' C O O M N .--i N M O .--i c 0� r, .--i m O O c 'a+ Z 0 0 0 0 m O N N N N N M't th m 0 0 O N N N N M M n 01 O a) L t N N N N N N N N 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' L- -i .--i .--i .--i lC C 0 0 0 0 +' M V V V V V �o �o �o C = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �+ .--i .--i al O+' 01 _ Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O p to to to to M lfl l0 to to lfl lfl lfl to O � 'y to to to �'' m m L,ci J 1000000000000 0 J0 , 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc , 0 0 0 , 0 0 dr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L O O n n n n n n n n r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ Coco O n n n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' N n n n r\ r\ r\ r\ r\ n N O O O O n n n COM O O n n O 0 O Ln {p {D 1p {p � ^ Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln L{p r n Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 308 w w l9 0 Z) m 0 w O a O a M N N N O N 9 LU Z LU (L X LU 0 Z Z) LL LU a Q V V) 0 Z Q J 0 Z Q U Z H 2 (J J Q H Z_ a g LL O r U a) o� c m r V 0 vi M N N N M N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N N N ri N O N' O M 309 a, _ V a) c U (a r. O C c V f0 a) U C c (6 C Z (6 c a .- c f6 Lr) rU U) a -Y fa o i - d o CaCL o 0 00 ter. o O �M O Ln Ln (U = -Y -Y E c O L. v Q O LL C V V v Tt E f0 m J a) C C C C t6 L C 0 0 0 0 0000 Lf) Lf) Ln Ln Q H Z_ (Y g LL 0 r v El O O O O O O Ln Ln O 4J 4J 4J C C C 3 3 7 O O O E E E a a a J V fo a-+ c O V v a fo V fn c (6 a) a� F� cr c .E fo 4- w fa Ln ►13 C O O aL a U ro a) Ln a) L O L Q 70 a) O Q. Q fu O O O O O Lf) 0 0 L a) 3 O Q C' L (° o U c 0 ru 4� Ln L 0 0 4� 0-0 4� c a) a) CL tn fa fa a) 0)a, _0 L c =a v (n�3 (n V O C O N = � L L L L � O p v,) c 0 a, r a) a V D N Ln 0 M co N 310 CITY OF LA QUINTA FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET HOUSING AUTHORITY 2022/23 BUDGET SUMMARY * Gen,erail Fund amid RDA Low -Mod Housing Funid estimiaites udre for uniaipprapriaited reserves amid included annual Successor Agency Ilaain repaiymients ais aippraued with, the laist wind final recognized obligation paymient schiedule. The repaymienit for FY 2022/23 is $673,936. 29 311 312 F- z O' g w O U o O o 0 0 0 o O O O o O O o O O o O O O o o O 1 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 W O u'] 0 0 k0 r,i ri 0 0 O M M M 0 0 0l0 M M O M 1 M .--I M 1 00 1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 O 00 O 000 O O 000 0 0 00 O O 00 O 0 O O O 0 O i o 0 CL 0 O o 0 O o O O m o O 1 C 0 0 Oj 01 o O O N N u1 u)Ln u1 ,may n N .� 1 � i I 00 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 O 00 O cc O coo O O C O O ji 0 o O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O I o in o o Ln N o O O C 0 0 O 1A o O •--� ,--� N0 0 ^ N M M N n rl O 0 m of N 00 0 O O `o t0 t0 M 0 G1 C1 M N N m m m ^^ O N un N N ^ n n 0 ^ p N N N c N .--i O IA PSn n Ile It 01 M 07 O N O 0 I, Ln ,--i rn m (0 N r4 M ^ N m N N N N iA ,D r" N in ,� M N N N i0 O 1 � 1 00 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 O 00 O O O O O O coo o � 0 0 I O O 0 0 O v O O o O O cCY) O O Lr)o " i0 i0 i0 M M ,--� m 00 M Do N N N N ^ N N 0M O M i I 1 00 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 O 00 O 00 O o 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O 0 0 O O O 0 O 1 o v o v 0 0 O o 0 0 O -e o O IkD o� y ri 'i N 01 a m n n ^ M j N N N N M M 00 1 H w"o o N in W, N O O O a' m m Lr) 0 1A 1A w 0 N 1 N O 't CO 00 00 N N N M M M `� ri ri Yf O N i o .-� m ' ' " ,y 00 a; N M Of Ln OM cV of � M M '" ri ri ( O O � M M 01 r N m N q wl N N N m 10 to to M M N N V1 VI V1 p, W Vl V1 VI V1 ul V1 ul is }' T m la Q la la m f6 la is is m a., !n i+ it Y 7 }, i+ i+ 41 C 7 ++ a., W ++ O L a O O O O o O O C O O O O w U) �, v v c +' L, >' c s w U) ul t1 �, O' �• a ., >% al v T ul > >, in v, oC V i Q i U) V C i i M w � i N LL i v v i Q 01 O C C o T O Q 3 y 0 *' CYO C O a ZI W p C o p W O Z fl C C a >• al O L-+ +� L al O V1 L. v L. y v a� W m O— O C Vl a ,--i fl- U, O a V C VI i' a> a a> C a L. ra ate-, M C w a= L i a= a1 a+ a1 (6 07 H O a1 M oC 'o p oi{ o m ¢ � � oaf L o y p m o df � Co L 0 Co �, C6 a O df fu ca 2 .0 m N —°° Q o a° m y t � .� m 3 4.1 d v y d n g (7 p d d° Q a>i �Qm- 0¢c�zJNcn 0 = QQ- O1 a 0� c E 0°C� c ul m O o 0¢�7 0 Q ul is i f Q ul is +_' al i f Q @ i f E (n X= i f Z al L. 0 U o o�� o o o O C A L- t A O No O O N 0-1 0 C a O y O 0� O M 3 f6 M, y O O O n U) O 0J 3 fa M a+ 3 07 in 07 �� C y .--i M 0) S O y O 0) y O_ O , , •--� M , •--� •--� •--� •--� •--� •--� , 2 , N M CA , , M It It I It G , , O O , 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CD 0 0 0 0 O�rn Ornrnrnmmmm ,i Ohm ul p�00,i0 M p�Ornrnto N �p�0o0i0 M O .-I M 7 .-I M M•-I i"1 M O M O M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 313 w W o •� d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn a 0 O 0 0 0 O CIO Do m , , rn DDoco co 0 cm W Ul) _ U O a O G a N 00 O O o 0 0 0 O O N M rl O O o 0 0 O O p N N Ln Ln C, to 0 t0 N y v 7 U 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 O O � %j N O O O O O Oo C 0 cc O O O O NaO O NN N Ln Ln O 0 N N N N N N 0 N* N o O ^ r, r, M W M f\ f\ n +_ N W N 0o �n rl CD tD N to to N N wl > N 'y Ln Iff m oN r [f1 Cff rl ri N N N N Q J a � LU W 0 W N OJ 00 O O co 00 O O Z 'O O O O o C 0 O O ,mil W N = m Iff Iff 0ri o - - W O fY N C M M N O N O O N N 0 U Q N O1 00 O O cc o O O O O �'G O O 0 0 0 0 O O z N = Ul m lff lf1 '" ri '•I '•I O O N M M N O N O O N N O c 2 - O _H N M Do .y ., N N N N fb 00 CACA M M cn 0)CDfT 00 N N Do Do N N +_1 Q � f\ 00 00 M Lnqt fh M O N '~ +qT•I rqT4 r'4 11 to l0 10 M M m m N C H F H ' 4 F F H (J 3 V Z LL aj N v - +, L L > O CD ++ l0 O o Q L L 07 N N -O Ol +�+ �••I m c 100 dCL 1 O O O N _ Ul Z m G m O U � M Q C 0� fu C V p X E O 0 OJ 0�J � Q O 00 O C W , , 41 C < Z C , to Q o O O �,i f p w z _m OM O O J O O O f .-1 y D o O a � y cc U iy c g f 30 N>> ) 1� 7 Z M J Q, U 0 0 0 f LL LL O O C)Q ^ O Q 0 f 0 00 0 00 ta 0 0 w 0 c? c?M 0 MM fY OM O rn Z O U N M N N N N m C C fo C: C fu +C: C E � J C a� O' a CL)> , a ra U O C(L0 0 f0 J In O = O N a"' N O L N E >� C a C7 41 U rho N CC •L 4-1 � C }, 0) N cn ' C O V 3: O O C O � � L a , c . N 0 C :E 3 C 4J � 4-1 N UJ 0 o O Q N > = 4' 0 f6 U L ro C o a iD fn L. o 70 aEi rn U L L p 0) (U M O N O nA-ZU L f6 01 faf6 tD o 4' N fo Ln L. O � r-I V 4-1 C C @? m O O L O C o - o >- C foof0 O > > a--+ 0) 0) L f6 fn U >o 0 L r-I = 'C > L(U— a N w N 7 _0 O L O> 0 i O p V 0- O 4.+ O O O L a .41 4-1� C fi 4 � •O N w = VX uC Q-LO cn fug Q ` " 0 4' 4-1p ' 0 0) N > E o o v � C N M L N - O -a a o U 2 N 00 o> 'O p 0 f6 U) N fa o oC j f6 to NO V) a)O p O Ln c N fq N m M� L f6 j, >- a N N N Q can fu �� E D�fna) cn L O U a C fp NQ Z) M +� +L C 0 V fo C N O m>70 N 4-1 L L N N �O ate+ E O H O 0 O O C, 4-1 "0 L p O 7 Z) O'O Ln Q O F- J E N J N .— L >. fll a--+ _001 C C r-I N C O O -C p 4a O 0 LL ate--+ V ^ -0 j fn C V 7Q) a�-a w C 61 C C 070 Q L C LL p Q Z)In N O L cu CJl C L a..+ 9 _0 •L f6 f0 C •in p = V C M C -O O VI -C _0 U) C N o N U L n N -0 O O = o 6l Q 0)Q C f6 C CD ro 41 ' p 'a c C CLn �,= p J fn C m �,E LnL a Q C a) O -p O� o U C1 fY r-I O J LL 4-1 C a) LO N N M Ln L 01 •- > M O 0 0 N En Na NO'ON 314 M c-� O W O O O M O co 0 0 0 )D O Ln 0 0 -i O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C rl 0 o O 0 lD 00 n .--i N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 g C) C) C O Ol c 0 O o 0 O 1 o O o 0 0 0 O O O O 0 o O o 0 O O O O O o 0 0 o O 0 00 O 00 O r, o O O O o 0 o n o 0 o p O o 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 O i O) R N N M n O) O to o O O S 00 It dl Ln 't LO O to O N M O l0 't 00 N O O 1 n N lD N to N 00 Lo Do O Lr)O N LA Ln i M 1A N N 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 CD 'T Ln Ln O O O O n Ln N O .--I •--i O 00 00 M 00 It Ln O W M 1 0) n Lr) 0) lD O lD lD N (IJR;3- N W It Ln Lr) O M O) M n N Lr) O n ko W l0 Lr r-i 'T 0) O N M O -i -i N CA CO M O O O N Ln .--I ri L N M D n N N 00 00 1 N � ri ri i O O O 0 O O O O O O O o o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 00 O 00 O O O O O O O O O p 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O I M cc N v lfl O rn 0 LO O O o O O O O ! '� � 0 N O O O S 00 •--i M co .--i Ln M M O Ln O .--i N M 00 lD MC 0� O O 1 Ln N Ln N N to N OO Ln wl Ln N IA IA 1 1 M N N N i I j O o o O o o o O o o 0 0 o o 0 Coco C O O o o O 0 00 O 00 O 0 o O o 0 0 0 o p o 0 o p o o p o 0 o O O 0 0 O i M W N v lD lD 0) cc LO O o o O o o O - ! v 0 N o 0 O S W ti M 0 ti Ln M M 0 Ln 0 ti [V M 03 to rM n 0) O O O 1 Ln N Ln N N to N 00 m N wl Ul N Ln Ln s M N N N 1 1 O Ln O Ln M O O N O M Ln 0 lD N LA M O (:;) M 0) M N 0 0 0 0 N N N Ln IA IA S ,t oo Ln oo O O N� .-- .-- N O .--1 O O lD O O n O 1-1N O O O O lD LO 10 � qT qT S O r,) lD •--i N N n Ln .--i •--i O) n n ^ (:,O •--i O N Lr ^ O O" O O Lr Ln Ln rl) C) -t O N Ln M N Ln N .--i 07 N CID n N N M co ,--i O Ln n N N w LA LA M ri N n rL ri U i1 y y y Vl y N y Vl ate+ teI a 4J N -W 41 41 41 w Q 0 = E o — Ln HUH 0 l� H 0 n� LnM _C L 0 LoUF 0 F 0 F 0 H 0 F • ♦- E m 1�6 V N H L.L a U u > In Ln q) •T y _ N '- L Ln U 4J = Ll Ln y = a — n° v c ro �+ �, r co o p �, Ln CL ;� V a c 0 'E OL 0 y E 0 LU c o+ _ O E d' a�i = O' v o oG p1 a O o a° o) o c i Ln oL U a) m i J M aa)) M J Ln LMn id E >, C C Ln Ln E U U U 4i C Qi >° L. L m 06 y/ O i O� Q 1 L �- y 1 Ln O +.+ .L H C C, t 0 N N m +' N c N. n U U LL - Ln N L Ln V) O Ln >, Vl 'LA L a� N C V CL dS a Z T 16 +.+ V V a i w N U1 1 i• N x V += CL W a o c o .L E U c o ~ m o= 0 +, -LI L V O ILo O i y <V u E ,V n R +� 0 O ro O L p N E v o Q L m w 0 0 W V w > V a+ V) L L ca p 2 as+ c0 O a� a� N n N O° fA > Q i LL6 C y "Ln = F L +S N +�+ Qa �a(nUOaO�i�JJ�LnLn i �a¢¢U �HO �aw 01 y1 0 10 IO y 01 LT 0 10 cn L9 -i U) O O O U) -i N M V U) O O. 1 10 V M lD ro 1 = O O= m M V O= w O Im _ =_ = nLn _ Z O O -i -i ON N N N N N N N N N rA 1 y Oi Oi -i l0 +' rM V +' = L. 00 00 .--i CD +' y m _ _ •� ++ a+ _= •N 7 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO T Ll) T T Ln Ln Ln L!) L!) L!) L!] L!] Ln Ln C 0 0 0 0 lD lD lD 0 0= •m - - lu .--i +--i co C 01 Orn T L.=y . L �) 0 O= = p 1 r r r r r r r r r r r r r N V -i -i -1 S ri r � LH ri r r 1 = 1 � M = 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 M 1 O O ON ON Q Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) m mQ) O) m mO p) Q• Q N rn rn N 01 rn ON tDO .--i ON •--� M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 315 Ln rl M a 000 0O 0 M m W = ' V ca U 0 o � CD - La w N N > N o o O 00 O O 6 U1 O M 1 o o O o o O O O M in � . 0 \ N N Ln N N 00 > a O M N L � r 3 N U N C r6 � }O O O O 00 O O O N a o o O O O O O OL N= m O o 0 O NCLD N p m 0 Ln O IA 0 LT `a n N U/ L O ,p O L L Ll V L N iE > O' CD 0 It N � O N 0 N q m L O N N Q M M tT Q G 7 � O N y o o O 00 O O 2 0 ;a OOO o0 O N 4� w N= ^ N N O O N rl w (n 0 m N m00 O O VDO N C N 0� n LZ N X w 7 ' > U u La O N N Oo 00O o 0 O O a 0 0 0 O O O N D N= M 0 M o 0 M N O a 0 m N n n 0 n It L U N N N h LA z C ti L Ln - a� O 2 O C ri N N O ^o n 00 N N 00 O ++ (3' M N N N u N V � N N VD O Q C) LA LA (A 0 O N ri ri O _0 ,-i N to 7 N L y y Ln m V) r N 10 f0 f6 C V1 V > 0 OL F 0 F ) m 6% �' Vl NrN LL� W rp N i Gl L a G7 :E W (n L1 f�A W O S .T, LU W W U) ++ V i y C U)�-W G Q 7 L.L `� C U) OL N ++ C Z; a 4� E C y a a Qm m y N o O V K V W L C G Vl s 0) +.+ C z y `0L^n0 �o� a _ O Z3 'FA Q C w .i .i W ++ aN S O d 3 coo 1p 1p U U 7 ri 47 o o , o N O 00rn ONOm 2-O U N N N N fu co co 316 _0 c 7 LL iT O 0 L c Q) U Q1 V L ^ L c F fs O c c ra i U E a� rya v UU O 0 0 fu M ^� 0 p o L 0 It rj Q `/ 4 4-1 c U fa , C O " U fa a) V) 00 O\a�C O'fn L v 0 u c c c ovwv E E E C:Oa�ca�aJa� fo (ara ffu _ c _ (n CO fca fca UIiUQ� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O in fn C fn 0--o 4- c Ln Ill C L c 0 Ln o E E Q U 0) rn C C 73 OO 22 O Q L c O o> in U ar) � C J o .0 fb a N � � J 5 � c V y O fa Ln fa O In aJ Ln fu c -r aJ V Q Lu fn E fa a v fa fn w V .L En En c a) E fa c cfa C aJ 0- 0 E f- aJ c @ aJ � Lu L 0 LL aJ a-+ fa � C a) pl c 3 fa O J J_� L C O Z3 Z v 317 0 0 w w l9 0 Z) CD 0 w O a O a M N N N 0 N 9 J_ Q H w 0 w (% 1 Z LU a X w r O 2 H D Q U Z_ O 2 Q H z a g LL U a) o� c m r V 0 .14 ;N 0 M N ry N C N m M N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N' C) 0 m u +J 10 G Ln 41 0 Z � F F LL Q y m Z y C C O. cn N W O y @ Lm L C Cl J U)= O ++ C i O K O 3 L'm0 O Oy � yin J C Z 0 coo ce O o M oo 0 � O � N N C O LL T 4, C al C •3 � � O a) � > a) L — U) (6 N '6 L L C O •- w N_ C O 6 U a� -a0 L _ > -0 O — L — Q tp C M � ON a) M p E O {.P, L O ,,- Q O 41 0 O C � L U Q �- a) � L 3 C >, ro 4-, O 'C v � C � O Q 0) Q C C C � F _ O 0- 0 a) > 4-1 � � O a) m 4� L ai > L U O @ w 0) M C � O N O N O N a) a) � � L � o w C C li7 O 0) U C � V) o O 4� O 2 a) U) O C 57 0 JLn -0 o� oC a) M U) N W M m co 318 9 J_ Q H w 0 w (% 1 Z w a X LU r O 2 H D Q U Z_ O 2 H Z_ (Y g LL O U y ++ o 0 � Q O O C m O V m th > N v 0 M ,i Ln L N N o r N W M N N N O N N N N 0 N N N \ N O N N N N O N' W W 0 0 CD O M ko O Ln 0 Lin o W W m W V M41 10 f6 Z O F F 0 LL �_ � .. LL C V) 0 W O O CO C Z o O V) = a) C cv eve. O m 6� k N C G W y Q -a 'O ga Lo +1°+ J Q M C K V O 0 01 W I O y Uf O O O O ce rl y m -1 Ln ocaCD 0 o a U o o :3 �oI oo '� 0 0 0 0 G a+o�°�� z O O N N N to C) 9 (a ro 4� (0 L a) a) Q L O f6 L Ln O _0 41 � C U (6 w U 0) (6 � ro w a) O � C O � O � 6 M � 3 + r O C w O � L v S � C a) N U L m � 3 c ' Q C C M O Lf) Lf) 41 c ra (6 N C ra �a O >. U a) C > -0 m O 7 O '6 J C N L � Q 'O -a C (L) 4- L U 4) L41 a 41 C �U a) � L � (6 Q V) Q -0 O C -r 7 U w a) � U C L F- ro C J 41 LL (6 -0 c C O Uj Oco - U o '^ � o C C p a) � Q C •C O U 7 U)�� U U)0 In 41 O rn O L N O O O co 319 w = m (.9 V 0 0 Z) CD w th N o O U) > N O M a N N a N C M L N L N = N U 0 }N fi N N oo O N O .y N O m N 'p 0) U) O O a N * CD N \ ++ ri > N 'y O V N Q G H U) N O 00 U) wl o 'y IZ N m O X N C w y 3 U O � N N o O N Q U N O m Q N LL O (4 Y1 N coO O O Q ~ N � y W of v m co w v Ul `Q U 4) r L .2 4% L ~ U) ai L) Vl V C i uo w C (n V U z Z .� U D Q d c c 0 g LL O u a• a J O 0 O O O O O ,..i O U M M O N M r— co 320 CITY OF LA QUINTA FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET The SilverRock Golf Resort Fund will be presented to City Council on June 21, 2022. 38 321 W l9 0 Z) CD Q w O a O a M N N N O N 9 w Z w a X w 0 z LL LL J Q V w d H z oY g LL O U 01 O � � O m V Co N >N M M N N 00 N C N m M N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N N N ri N O N' C] Ln O 0 V' V1 IA W m m O O � F F W 3 a m 10 O i r- Gl d1 w LL a C L C {j m Q� QM UL, 01 O U o O d .a rn J O fL0 � a o ' o M 00 O O O O N N V1 m O F W Q: 7 a W Z 7 LL F W LL a V J m N N M m co 322 O G O p M i0 M 3 N N N H w V m (.9 M o Z) CD w th N 00 I� n o M rl ^ n n p N N a N C Ln LA N y M L N L N = (i N 0 }N 00 00 O N O O O l00 N= O M N N O m N M IA Gl y O O a` N* O O CD O vl N Ln .\i N Q G N N 00 n n n 'G O O M M M wl w N = O P� n O m N w O w N a � w ` 7 p U z LL N +' N N o 0 0 0 O J \ Q 'G C O O MLn m M m M ,i oN O � 00 00 w O m N N It d N rl � C O C N N N ko O Q N OO 00 N N N r -W � v O O O V) 2 a G LL v L N O L m W U (A i w m Z M. � i c {fI p 4, G7 U O _ E F ~ O m ~ Q Am " O J M O alo0 w O O � may•--i�C O �rn m g LLJ 'o U �o W 1 O O O 0 rO O .i O O O 0 � U N N N M N M 0 v 323 C� O O O O O w m V (.9 p o Z) CD p w> N O O O O O O M ,. N N o a N C M L N L N = (i N 0 N N y o o O O O N O o o O O O N= m oD 0 O O O O O O O N Gl y O O a` N * n O N IA IA o N m m m N'y N O O O m m m N QV G N N 0 0 O O O a o 0 0 O O w N= m O CY)O O O O z N C ri O O ri ri w N a � w ` 7 p V z N +' N N 0 0 O O O \ Q O o 0 0 O O O O O ,i U N= CO o� cc:))O O O w O (I. N O O O wl 'i Ul) C 0 N N N N ++ rn M M N IA IA O N V N wl wl wl O Q rl O O O O v y 10 Lq Vi @ ; c d °1 o 0 0 (tf Cl) H F F a H V G � O L v Z L •U L {L Z O 7 Vl �, a m H a O N V) V) a V m i C c LL 0 0 U fA O N U U C Q < IL 0 c U 01 y o Vl O W z Ud `ornO 0 O V1 d Q W c c 0 0 ' O T 1peq ' J V O O N LL O cc 00 OO fV N N U N N N N M v 324 O1 N o 0 C O' 0 O o r w m (.9 V M o Z) CD p N w th n N U1 > N M M O M ri iO O 0 N N 000 O N = N V 0 }N fi N N 00 O N = N m O N 'p Gl y O O a N * CD .,i > M M N 'y oM O N Q M M G H N O M Ln M w N 7 0 0 O m 00 O Z N C r .� w N ,� a � X w 7 p V Z N +' N N 00 J a N w O m d N L.0 C O ri N N m 00 00 0 O Q CD o .-i y m -W O F 7 O Z; th O L V w ru O C c mom Z c o� H LL � 01 N CDZ_ '- o m G y m C d � O' p 00 O N p O O U N N y O H G Z LL m a O N N Ln N M N V 325 C a 00 00 I� O N w = m i V ii (.9 M o Z) m w t N 00 0 0 O OM " N N '"i .N-1 IA .N-1 IA O a N C Ln LA N y M L N L N = V N 0 }N 00 00 O N O O O O N = Ln O O O co Ln Ln Ln N 'p Gl y O O a` N* , M O O M Ln 0 Ln N N Q G N N 0 0 0 0 O O.N-i ,N-i w N m 00 O � Lf Ifl O IA In O z N w N a � w ` 7 p V z N +' N N 00 00 O \ Q O 0o O O O O ,i o� O O w O m N Ln d N 11 rl Ul) C 00 rl N V L M M O Q In In N y V) y N C Q H F. F W Q1 Z V .V O a O LL U L. M M � oCU) N av cn y > Vro a0 a O � MO N caca C N L m y Q u O Q a C UI U r C O z V 01 w I m O y C `NO� lC Gl O d M C O O Co V 0 o S LL a ,o 0o ,o O O 0 O 0 O N N O O N O N N U N N N N M co v 326 t 3 O O 00 00 't co Go H w V m (.9 M o Z) CD p N w th N �O > 00 a' M O Ol at Cm Ol Ol a M rl O \N W W %0 y N M L �i ri ri N L N = N (i O N N 07 00 00 O O N O 00 O O O O O O N 7 CO rq N N N N 'p 00 00 00 00 co 00 00 O 47 M M M O O a` N * m 00 M wl wl w VD O m m N 'y O V Ln Iff �C1 n N N N N N Q N N M M G N 00 Lr O O O w N m O (n �p rl N ri ri w y 0- N N N w ` 3 p U z LL N +' N 0) 00 00 O O Q C) O L'I IA O O IA IA U N= m oN O O O w O a-N N N N N N N N � C rl rl rl O ri _N N O co ^ n LO IA O 00 IA IA IA IA O W 07 O Q O 00 CD 1O N i0 N N t00 t00 N N C VI V> N N U 41 41 ate+ &j VO F O F O O F F o O ++ O N z -o O N +W V 07 a O L 47 C 1L m Y W ul W C Ln C m C z��p) IM41 F a LL M y !n O ~ W zLLI a, K o+ o Z) O G W O O) U) w CD 0 O O M N d (/f C Z O m O N W? 0 0LL H O O O O o CD CD M N O N N U N N N n N M v v 327 0 0 0 w w l9 0 Z) CD Q w O a O a M N N N O N 9 w Z w a X w 0 z LL LL J Q V w d F- Z a g LL 0 U a) o� C m r V 0 M N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N N N ri N O N' V1 IA m m O O F F 4J 7 O O +� R Z O i w a1 LL w W V) C cd C L C q) 4J M V m 0 1 1 C 4L1 C0A O � CA O t y y O O !aC M C M C, Z o 0 al ,no0� N O N N N W N M 328 0 O N N w N � OI Z N w a X w 0 I z � N IL N J \ . Q N w OI d N- 0 0 Ln n rn m � Vl 0 W O IL +� y H C C Z 0 a) O w z E ++ L 'OL i W y O O 6 Q O \ 0 z LA Q ae$ O ca O C C ~ C U O Io Z 'y C N C w 4 + W N 00 O O N N N M 329 CA o O o O O O C� 0 0 0 0 O O w m V (.9 M o Z) CD p N w> N 00 00 O O O M ,i a-N N a C N M L N L N = N V 0 N N O) 0 0 00 O O N 'O o O O O N m N N W Ifl O N p Ol y O O a` N* N 0 0 0 0 O O \ ++ ri > N 'y N Q G N O 00 00 O O G o O O O w N = O m Lr) 1!1 IA IA z N C w N a � w ` 7 p V z N +' N O o 0 00 O O \ Q O 0 0 O O O O O ,i N 7 O m N 1!1 IA IA w d N � C O (4 _N N p O 00 00 � 00 00 C ,q co .q .q O O O Q 1O t0 t0 t0 N r m IL 0 0 0 �0 cp c a c 4) M .E O a O - Vl .2 cL0 i M M m (AV u� c) L I-cn a o, aS u O 0 w cn -O S p Z . y v > i o aif v 0?i = OC Q w0°1~O C xCA UI V ��� C O O z = a+ m m O d y c mCDO M c0 01CD 007 ++ ++ O } 0.� g Q'o ~ ' u p ox , o , o V Cto o� V1 rl G N O N N Z U N N N O M M 330 o C 0 C 'n u N O 0 0 ti O i oo C � C C 4i 0 Vi W _N V1 m m f0 10 10 ro H F F F F O T r. 'E 2 V) C C �0 K vi k 0 !n 01 o6 a Q > ui W �.S2 yh � C G c0 N E 41 0) O mc c U1 S > Q M @F- o aciu0 acn e LL 0 c vl V 01 a.i � y f0N0 a �( � W K V W i O p O a V) p LL G +i m W Lm 00 N IT 4' 0 0 O V a of T mT O Q? V O O O V O N V p o 00 W O O O O M p 0 0 0 N N N N w v 331 w im V (.9 M o Z) CD p w N W N0 0 00 0 0 O O a f+1 o O O O N N a C N M L N L N N = V 0 N fi N 0 00 00 00 O O N O o O Ln N N N = coM M fr ^ t\ % k0 O qT N 'O fU W O O a` N iE n t\ M 0 0 fr 0% .\i t Ln N N N n f\ Iff Iff rl N N N Q N fU 00 00 0 0 O O O O o N N N w w'G N= co M Of M" N N (n z O N C M w a N w � ` 7 p V z N +' N O 00 0 0 00 O O \ 0 0 0 O O O (j N = m M pi M M N N w d O N M 9T L.0 C 0 O ++ n f\ r, t\ O� 0 't Rt N V O a a fA M M M M P In t\ In N C H N F a F F F O = N 6 O N G Z LL V +-+ p +' - w W C ++ m M Hi 06 y i a C fA LL } {Y V J V fa C Q � �L) Q m U K V o oC z fT 'y ++ V W •--� W O O O Q D d Q.0'"-1 0 c c 0 a:i-1 =� 4_-i a0 a g U o o V o U LL O D 10Oo ,O ,o %Oo ,O 00o N O W W %0 U M O N M N M N M N M rn v 332 0 0 O O C 0 0 e 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 ILA O io Ln 0 0 o p M o 1"� 0 0 r, r, CD � VD W ko i O 'i .L-I I 000 p 0 0 0 0 00 O O i O O N O O O O N N 0 Ln rl 00 O 00 i 1 .� .� N n n i I j 000 0000 0 0 O O f o o ILA o O ILA ILn ko Ln rl 00 O .-I rl f N N 1 O O p 0 0 RT RT S m N i0 1 O M M M Ln N O .ti C -W o 0 to 41 -W ate+ -W F F H V)LL.�F o a) m _ H Z �o.0 E- c a'0 Z R W .�- i 0-6W m GJ p i C LL a L� aS C'ZIcn x W Lw fn z Z O v ++ CO v_ u L a, U) r al LU yJj V> i Y i0 � c L C 0 > w 4, rn a E Q (n U0 3J E F L O C yc � O~ I C UI U U O fl. K 01 i 01 O W O > , W 0 f y` N Ln O O 'G M M lC O N U) U) Oul 01 O C Z r r 0 0 t 0 0 0 rn w V U o o O o 0 0 o G cc W 0 0 0 coo 0 0 0 CD O Z L O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 �00r�r 0r�r�r� O^ U O �T 'T I�T ItT It 'IT W N N N N N N N I M M M 0 Ln 333 )� 0k Mk k °a n eM ?um EƒI i §th® \_ 00 /n n inm 0�" »n k k r � N u / q 00 00 0 00 00 § f4 : 0 c 6 ? 0 6 ° § § m -_ _ k a q` o ko co 0 0 �2 0 �a �0 � � q 0 0 rl n n \§ 2 in \Ln \§2 'Tq /7 00 \ j u § q 0) 0 0 0 0 0 < 3 o 9 Ln Ln : & « § 0 ? 0 Q 0 0 w zm� I 0 ( 0 o ° Ln Go Ln 3p so o o a CD In � N $ m P% § ) ) 0 0 § \ k 0 2 � ) / [ / § 2) fA w z §� -0� >� Ln �� �41 �/� < k w § 2 § 2 22M\� �o 2 / Z2'�� u\ �\ al CD �§$/ _o / 0 / O ® r1l � q G 334 W l9 0 Z) m Q w O a O a M N N N O N 9 w Z w a X w 0 Z LL LL J Q V w d H z_ Z) a g LL O U C O' O M t 3 V Co C N >N o M 0 N N o 0 N C Ln N m M N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N N N ri N O N' 0 0 0 0 0 y m -W O F ++ 7 O o G � Z n L LL w C M C R 0 J = F w C 01 O1 U 01 cd m- CD 0 y � o C O a o ' o O O O N O Ln N N 1 O F G Z LL LL N V W 0� Y oc Q a Ln N Ln M M 335 W l9 0 Z) CD Q w O a O a M N N N O N 9 w Z w a X w 0 z LL LL J Q V w d H z a g w O U C O' M t 3 V Co C N >N 0 M ri C N ry 0 NLn C N N m M N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N N N ri N O N' 0 0 0 0 Ln N V1 IA m m O O F F 4J 7 O r G m Z O L C w O LL ul NV) G 4J M L C W M 0 F O C y 01 O Z (m 01 O C U y�U)m O O � O c V O ' o fV 00 O O N Ln N N M M co m 336 0 0 w w l9 0 Z) CD Q w O a O a M N N N O N 9 w Z w a X w 0 z LL w J Q w w d Q H z a g w O w a) o� c m t V 0 M N N N 0 N N N N O N N N N 0 N N N ri N O N' 0 0 0 N M M Lr1 � V1 IA a) 10 10 Q a+ a+ X O O w F F w th w v) G U r 1 C m Z e a+ W K d c {L! C Cu mo 41 Q 0 I�LI C K V O G 01 W O y M CD 00 O O co J O O M 00 o N O Ln N N n M M v 337 \ 0 L a j § \ § E r & a / rlj ■ 0 E . § � q N m N N N § m c - § k k § �0 m / .j§ 7 / u » �a:/� .o �gU) § 2 222\ 2 � r C M 0 u§�/■ Ln 7 N N E q G 338 o g 0 ° 0 c i c 0 0 0 o g 0 ° C 0 e ter. 0 0 ^ f\ m M m M M f - c? rl 00 � �! u1 N CD cn r\ cn r f i N q1 r of l I 1 L�fl In N 11 fA f I o 0 Co Co o N n I N N u1 � O u1 fV f n IA qT q i 0 n r i I i 00 00 00 0 0 0 f I 00 0 C)0 o o i N N N u1 O f\ r f\ Ln u1 N f f � � 1 I - r N o 0 0 0 of I S O 0 0 RT R N N w u1 M f rMl to l in to in rn in i Iri m f6 10 Ifi I O O O O O I p U-) F F F F F F Z a Iv LL u U a� _ ) L a fA I= C C ro M W N C O m (/1 !n O w 06 V C +.+ I]7 vl fU M 06 O i y C cn V C� x Q 1 w .� a'' co U k i w i C 'In u O G J cLo L. C y GJ a m Vn fa e V 17) J 4 N O O O Q as ~ ,06 K V fn o F m K RT co w ' L 0% o e a y W �o L. 0) moo '-o O C v �o 4+ 00 t0 In M N cs0 a0 It cm fo W.Oo �ot�0 V o Ho f Q o o o o o L 1 O �o �o 00 a+o O O o r\ O o o o n N N n N n N n N C 0 339 O1 N o 0 C O' 0 O o r w m (.9 V M o Z) CD p N U1 > N ino 14 n Ln p N N 0 O N = N U 0 }N fi N N 00 \ O N = N m O N 'p Gl y O O L a N * rn 0 \ > ^ N ri > N N Q rn M G H N N Ln Ln N w N 3 00 O Ul O m N w N ,� a L X L w 7 p U z LN +' N N 00 J a N w 0 CO d N L.0 C 0 ri N M N 0 0 0 D ci O Q o 74 N N 0 N y m 41 O Z ~ O = LL O ce 0 i a Vw � w c J a C M L a 0 1 c o+ Q Q Ol U 01 z V ,a) 0 inm O' Q c c rn g a o w O ' o O u f 00 0 0 � U Rt It O M 340 0 0 w w l9 0 Z) CD Q w O a O a M N N N O N 9 w Z w a X w 0 z LL w J Q U w d a) o� c m r V 0 ;N o M N ry N C N m M N N N O N N N N O N 0 Ln W N M M 00 N N y o Ln \ a o N 3 N N M M O W a m Z O a o w Z U a) Q a) w a m w C Ma C J a m c 10 M r Q al Z C O W , W d O V1 J C m C, a��oN D ) 0 O O L p �D O �o n n w m 341 W l9 0 Z) m Q w O a O a M N N N O N 9 w Z w a X w 0 z LL LL J Q V w d Q H Z) a g w O U C O' O M t 3 V Co .14 ;N 0 M N N 1� 4, N C N m M N N N O N N N N O N N N ri N O N' 0 0 1 N N M y m r O H O C f.7 C i E4-1 �a a� ~ m Q o m C UI V a - O0 Too o m O W ? V O V � 0 W �p O �o n n N It M rn 342 w l9 0 Z) CD Q w O a O a M N N N O N 9 w Z w a X w 0 z LL LL J Q V w d H z a g LL O U o+ °1 c a M r3 V Co N �N o M ri o N N rl 1� 4, N C N m M N N N O N N N N O N N N ri N O N' O 0 O Lri Ln 0 N Ln O 0 O N Ln Ln n n Ln y m r O H O C 67 o � L V E z �-a+ O c a c U Z v ' d W � 0 O c c 0 o O u Q ' o N 0 W O �p O �o n n M M 0 co 343 CITY OF LA QUINTA SPECIAL FUND EXPENSE NOTES FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET EXPENSE NOTES EXPENSE NOTES BY FUND NUMBER - 203 Public Safety Fund There are no transfers out for CIP proposed for FY 2022/23. 210 Federal Assistance Fund Transfers Out for CIP - City Hall miscellaneous interior ADA improvements. Expenses include the Boys and Girls Club Fee Waiver Reduction Program (CDBG) in the amount of $20,000. 212 Federal Assistance Fund There are no changes for expenditures from FY 2021/22, expenses include COPS robbery and burglary/theft prevention. 220 Quimby Fund does not have Capital Improvement project funding allocated in FY 2022/23. 221 AB 939 CalRecycle Fund is used for recycling solutions at schools & City parks. 223 Measure A Fund Transfers Out for CIP - Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation of $1,100,000; Jefferson Street at Avenue 53 Roundabout of $630,000; Fred Waring Drive Pavement Rehabilitation of $530,000; Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitation of $500,000; Highway 111 at Jefferson Street Rehabilitation of $487,000; Moon River Drive Pavement Rehabilitation of $400,000; and Citywide traffic signal maintenance improvements of $235,000. 225 Infrastructure Fund is a Development Impact Fee Fund used for capital improvements. No additional projects are anticipated in FY 2022/23. 226 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Fund expenses are for emergency operations center (EOC). 227 State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP) Fund expenses are for Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) training. 230 CASp, AB 1379 Fund expenses are for training for Americans with Disability guidelines and a pass -through payment of 10% to the State Architect Office based a $4 per business license tax. 235 South Coast Air Quality Fund expenses are for an agreement between CVAG and member jurisdictions which contribute 75% of AB2766 South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) revenues. 247 Economic Development Fund There are no transfers out for CIP proposed for FY 2022/23. Expenses are for general economic development activities. 250 Transportation DIF Fund Transfers Out are for CIP - Avenue 50 Widening Improvements. 251 Parks & Rec DIF Fund Transfers Out are for CIP - Fritz Burns Park Improvements. 252 Civic Center DIF Fund Transfers Out are for CIP - City Hall Capacity Improvements. 253 Library Development DIF Fund Advance Interest Expense is for outstanding Successor Agency loan repayment. 254 Community & Cultural Centers DIF Fund is a Development Impact Fee Fund used for capital improvements. No additional projects are anticipated in FY 2022/23. 255, 256, and 257, and 259 Development Impact Fee Funds are used for capital improvements. No expenditures are anticipated for FY 2022/23. 270 Art in Public Places Fund (APP) covers the maintenance contract, updated inventory of all art in public places, internal city inspections and engineering services for new art installations. 61 344 CITY OF LA QUINTA SPECIAL FUND EXPENSE NOTES FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET 405 SA PA 1 Capital Improvement Fund Bond proceeds designated for SilverRock Way improvements. 760 Supplemental Pension Plan Fund Annual PARS Trust Contribution is for one plan member as established in 2012. 761 CERBT Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) Trust Fund- The City participates in the California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) for the purpose of accumulating funding for OPEB obligations. The CERBT is a Section 115 Trust and is an agent multiple employer plan for those electing to prefund OPEB obligations. Expenses in this fund can come from losses on the portfolio and fees paid to administer the portfolio. 762 PARS Pension Trust Fund - In 2019, the City established a Section 115 Trust Agreement with U.S. Bank National Association and Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS), Trust Administrator. The Section 115 Trust was established as a means to set aside monies to fund the City's pension and OPEB obligations. Contributions to the Section 115 Trust are irrevocable, the assets are dedicated to providing benefits to plan members, and the assets are protected from creditors of the City. The purpose of the Trust is to address the City's pension obligations by accumulating assets to reduce the net pension liability. Expenses in this fund can come from losses on the portfolio and fees paid to administer the portfolio. 62 345 y ++ o 0 0 o p o p o 0 0 0 0 � o p o o � o o C O O Ln r, O 00 r` m M O O O O 00 0 Ian NCO D1 n °Jao �o �o n r W = ro (.9 V M 0 Z) In Q W to N U1 > N N N Ln M M M M 00 00 m M ON c O M .d tl N N O to O n O N m Ln N N rn fJ1 M m f\ Ln a N O N ni o O Lri P, .. N N L M a7 `. M O •� Lff r% r N V N CY) O N }} a+ LL N O 0 Ln 1.0 a) r, M 00 00 00 00 11 I' m r" M � 00 00 . N O .-1 O OD c N= t Ln 00 w M M M ttl t N O O� Ln fA N al � 00 U) rl rl C+f f O a` N* Ln o Ln M M 0 0 ■-1 00 c > 00M IT rnLn 00 COLtD t0 m c N +' 7 It m 00 M f1N) Y1 '" rl O c N Q M O 1 M Ln L N W In a ry l o N %0 01 0 0 n N r .-1 00 c M .--i N N N O 0 00 CO M M O c W M O1 lc N 'T a O m m m M Or1 c N= N NrlQ W Nm m Ln Ln i N O , M Ln C1 N L N C N l0 t:, C fA ^ O N t0 t l7 O ` Ln t0 t tY = a V H z 2: N y M ko D Ln O o t0 00 00 W t o LLI � O r"r\ 00 > 0 L o N 3 Ln ni T r m f� 00 Ln O Ln ko a N Ln Lo rn ch 00 0)0 00 t C 00 OL c J L d 0 Q U ri to N � 00 rn� a 0 00 W f>1 M f O ++ o O M 00 - ■-1 O c N V o m � W .-i ■ OQ Ln m kD N t0 0O 00 Ln L N r\ r O M c Ln v V1 y Q V1 IA VI 1 10 m i M 10 10 1 O O s 0 O O 1 0) = C O CDc� y e IL w O Ln O L4 .0 Vl a+ • u al L O C C LLI O O (AL N ]- O :: tS 0 Cr k al Vj '� U M CL tT CL w U w O C C i to L. IA Q Cr +�+ L N N O 4+ O O �+ C 6 CL O N a H U O V U V O U 0 a% J m c u C Uf LOj = C Q c K V O Q a_l �+ , m to k w O u z J 0 0 00 00 a1 CD a) w 00 C C d N 5 0 0 0 0 0 f0 l00 n C g Q V o 0 0 o f o S O o V o F LL O' o o 0 o o ' ' ' ' o 0 V o w 0 O O O N O N leO O 00 tz 0 0 0 O O O O O O O U It It It It It Nt I m co 346 4J C 7 O a w `a r Z W x W a i N J Q H N a a z_ U a g o LL o -a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +--1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —1 �.O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O I� M O Ln O O Ln 0 I� O O O O O n O O O O O M LIl 0 0 L!l N u) H M O Ln O O M M� M O LIl O O O� ul u) 0 0� rl rl rl rl In C: � a) 4-1 v In E ° a=i E aaii u) B c a) a) c 4 > > >�o> �L a)foa) ao +'U a) > °— +�0� >Q °'� nE E�oroU�� n����°�c> �� �p fO E i'-i is > C f0 C L= a) 7) L 1 H C L p f6 -6 d d' 4- O' OL > C > c -a L > L L ?j Qro a�'ra-°�CCnL- U)�r;M>`:L.a��60 V U Q Q U-0 Q. •ra � I --I n�� U L Ln a ° 41 � x J O L- L a..+ U a) L CJ m `n U p 0 E E w p fa L o u E Q� L- LL N >, N Q 7 U M �6 +-+ f0 f0 f0 L '� a) '� fp U 4-O f6 C M B U L L c� Q >> d d O o N �_ � °�� 4� V) Cl) Cl) a V °QUU�aLn>>�>�Q�°oo ��Eo.aa U v E c� L ° a 6 6 l7 l7 l7000LL2r,�Q=wIZLnLn» Cu iZLiLiLiLiLiLiQQQQQQQU�U�UUUU� O U ,.,e — a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) ro �L.L > L fD 0� E IQ f6 f6fuL L L L L L L L L L L L L L L° V U d . L L L L L L 7 7 7 77; 7; 7 7 _ a) a) a) a) a) a) Ln cn cn cn cn cn m m cn Ln Ln In In In In m LL LL LL 7 C C C C C C M M M M M M M M fa M M M M M M N It M 3 U � 347 CITY OF LA QUINTA FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET FUND TYPE - GENERAL FUND 101 - GENERAL FUND - The primary fund of the City used to account for all revenue and expenditures of the City not legally restricted as to use. A broad range of municipal activities are provided through this fund including City Manager, City Attorney, Finance, City Clerk, Community Development, Public Safety (Police and Fire), Public Works, and Community Services. FUND TYPE - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 201 - GASOLINE TAX FUND - To account for gasoline sales tax allocations received from the State of California. These revenues are restricted by the State to expenditures for street related purposes only. 202 - LIBRARY AND MUSEUM FUND - This fund accounts for the revenues from property taxes generated for library and museum services. 203 PUBLIC SAFETY FUND - General Fund Measure G sales tax revenue set aside for public safety expenditures. 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND - This fund is used to account for revenues from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) received from the federal government and the expenditures of those resources. 212 - CITIZENS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) FUND - This fund is used to account for State of California funds received for law enforcement activities of the Riverside County Sheriff's Department, also known as Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF). 215 - LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE FUND - This fund accounts for special assessments levied on real property and the expenditure therefore from city-wide lighting and landscape maintenance and improvements. 220 - QUIMBY FUND - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. Capital projects to be funded from this source will be budgeted and expended in a separate Capital Projects Fund. 223 - MEASURE A FUND - In 1988, Riverside County voters approved a half cent sales tax, known as Measure A, to fund a variety of highway improvements, local street and road maintenance, commuter assistance and specialized highway transit projects. This fund is used to collect this tax and pursuant to the provision of Measure A, it is restricted for local street and road expenditures. 217 - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FUND - This fund is used to account for the proceeds of development agreement revenues collected and the related expenditures in accordance with State requirements. 65 348 CITY OF LA QUINTA FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllf ���� �������� ��� ��� ������ ���! ���� �� ��„�� �� ����� ��� ���� ���� ��� „ � �� �� , ���� �� FUND TYPE - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (continued) 221 - AB 939 CAL -RECYCLE FUND - This fund is used to account for franchise fees collected from the city waste hauler that are used to reduce waste sent to landfills through recycling efforts. 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE FUND - Revenue received from the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) and restricted for emergency operations center (EOC) materials and trainings. 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM (SHSP) FUND - Revenue received from the State Homeland Security Grant Program to local governments to assist to further the State of California's efforts to prepare for natural and man-made disasters and terrorism related impacts to communities. 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 - This fund was established as required under Assembly Bill 1379 and Senate Bill 1186 for the collection of the annual $4.00 business license accessibility fee. Funds shall be utilized for expenses related to enhancing accessibility requirements. 235 - SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND - This fund is used to account for contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Uses are limited to the reduction and control of airborne pollutants. 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND - This fund accounts for revenues and expenditures related to proceeds from sale of City owned land and future economic development. 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES - This fund accounts for development fees paid in lieu of acquisition and installation of approved artworks in a development with expenditures restricted to acquisition, installation, maintenance, and repair of artworks at approved sites. 275 - PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS FUND - This fund may be used for payments to survivors of deceased police or fire personnel serving the City of La Quinta. 241 and 243 HOUSING AUTHORITY - These funds are used to account for the housing activities of the Housing Authority which are to promote and provide quality affordable housing. 248 and 249 SUCESSOR AGENCY BOND FUNDS - These funds are restricted per individual bond covenants. 405 and 417 - SUCCESSOR AGENCY PROJECT AREA 1/2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS - These funds are restricted per individual bond covenants. 760 - SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN FUND - This fund is a defined contribution pension plan established by the City to provide retirement excess benefits to general employees of the City. 66 349 CITY OF LA QUINTA FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET 761 - OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT (OPEB) TRUST - The City participates in the California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) for the purpose of accumulating funding for OPEB obligations. The CERBT is a Section 115 Trust and is an agent multiple employer plan for those electing to prefund OPEB obligations. 762 - PENSION TRUST FUND - In 2019, the City established a Section 115 Trust Agreement with U.S. Bank National Association and Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS), Trust Administrator. The Section 115 Trust was established as a means to set aside monies to fund the City's pension and OPEB obligations. Contributions to the Section 115 Trust are irrevocable, the assets are dedicated to providing benefits to plan members, and the assets are protected from creditors of the City. The purpose of the Trust is to address the City's pension obligations by accumulating assets to reduce the net pension liability. FUND TYPE - DEBT SERVICE FUND 310 - FINANCING AUTHORITY, DEBT SERVICE - This fund is used to account for the debt service that will be used for the principal and interest payments of the Financing Authority's outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. FUND TYPE - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FEE FUND - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined by Resolution. Capital projects to be funded from this source will be budgeted and expended in a separate Capital Projects Fund. 250 - TRANSPORTATION DIF, 251 - PARK & RECREATION DIF, 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF, 253 - LIBRARY COMMUNITY CENTER, 254 - COMMUNITY CENTER DIF, 255 - STREET FACILITIY DIF, 256 - PARK FACILITY DIF, 257 - FIRE DIF FUNDS, AND 259 - MAINTENANCE FACILITIES DIF FUND- These funds are used to account for developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements and may not be utilized for ongoing operational expenses. 401 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - This fund is used to account for the planning, design, and construction of various capital projects throughout the City of La Quinta. FUND TYPE - INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 501 - FACILITY AND FLEET REPLACEMENT FUND - This fund is used to account for the ultimate replacement of city owned and operated vehicles, heavy equipment, and facilities. 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND - This fund is used to account for the ultimate replacement of city owned and operated computer hardware, software and computer maintenance and operations. 67 350 CITY OF LA QUINTA FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET 503 - PARK EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES FUND - This fund is used to account for the replacement of city owned and operated park equipment and facilities. 504 - INSURANCE FUND - This fund is used to account for the city's insurance coverages. FUND TYPE - ENTERPRISE FUNDS 601 - SILVERROCK GOLF COURSE FUND - This account is used to account for the activities of the SilverRock Golf course. 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF COURSE RESERVE FUND - This fund is used to account for golf course reserves for future capital improvements of the SilverRock Golf course. 68 351 352 City af �La Q"' uiata HOUSING ALFFHORFFY SPECIAL MEETING: June 7, 2022 IEI ID "iI""' 'TIILIIE: DISCUSS FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 PROPOSED HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET WE I E II' ID T'1 IN Discuss fiscal year 2022/23 Housing Authority Budget. E .IEC T'I E WIMMAlRY • The proposed 2022/23 Housing Authority Budget is presented to the Authority for review. • The Housing Commission will review and approve the proposed budget on June 8, 2022. The proposed budget has a surplus of $187,766. Final budget adoption is scheduled for June 21, 2022. f° IL IKPAcr The preliminary Housing Authority budget projects revenues of $2,170,436 (inclusive of the annual loan repayment of $673,936) and expenditures of $1,982,670. B IIGIRIIIIIICw' IN " JIII,.'[S Each Housing Fund section contains notes to explain changes from 2020/21 actuals, changes in 2021/22, and projections for 2022/23. The budget format is similar to the prior fiscal year and includes a fund balance summary and year to year comparison summary chart. After review from the Housing Authority, Staff will provide an overview of the proposed budget to the Housing Commission on June 8, 2022 for final review and approval. The final budget will be adopted by the Housing Authority on 353 June 21, 2022. Attachment 1 provides a narrative of Housing Authority revenue and expenses including the Successpr Agency (former Redevelopment Agency) loan repayment to the Authority. Line item details for these revenues and expenses are located in Exhibit A of the Attachment. LI ERNATIVES The Commission may recommend further adjustments to the budget. Per State law, the Authority must adopt a budget by June 30. Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Agency Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, Agency Director Attachment: 1. Fiscal Year 2022/23 Proposed Budget 354 ATTACHMENT 1 11S[IllNIG AU Illlh°°°°IIIII IIIII 9i 2,2, 22Illll uQ' IIIII° IIRk. IIIII w IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIIII IIIINI IIIII' IIIIIIIIIIIII W a __..____.. CALIFORNIA -- The Housing Authority budget provides resources for the evaluation of future affordable housing projects and programs, ongoing operational needs, and property maintenance, as well as legal and auditing services as required by the Authority. The summary is designed to provide an overview of the Housing Authority Funds. Line item details for revenues and expenses are located in Exhibit A of the Attachment. A preliminary review of the proposed budget will be presented to the Housing Commission on June 8, 2022 and is scheduled for adoption on June 21, 2022. The 2022/23 Authority budget has three active funds restricted to housing operations. Estimated Fund Balance, revenues, and expenditures for each fund are summarized below: IIII���IIIII IIIII IIII� flu IIIIIIIIIIII S When all funds are combined, there is a 21% decrease in revenues from the current 2021/22 current budget to the proposed 2022/23 budget. A slight decrease in rent revenue for Dune Palms Mobile Estates is expected due to current year-to-date activity. In addition, allocated interest has been decreased due to current capital market conditions as well as a fund balance decrease as a result of a land purchase. As investments mature under current economic conditions, these revenues are expected to decline accordingly. The RDA Low -Mod Housing Fund recognizes the annual loan repayment from the Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the Successor Agency (former Redevelopment Agency). For 2022/23 the total loan repayment is $3,369,682, which is allocated 80% to the General Fund ($2,695,746) and 20% ($673,936) to the Housing Authority Fund. Any of the Housing Authority portion of the revenue not expended will be recognized in reserves in in Fund 243. The final loan repayment is scheduled for fiscal year 2029/30. Remaining outstanding loan repayments after 2022/23 total $25,116,811 of which $5,023,362 will be allocated to the Housing Authority. M1�7 Vi:IIII''i'°IIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIII The Housing Authority Fund (241) has an overall estimated decrease of 3% which is attributed to operational expenses for Dune Palms Mobile Estates compared to current year projections. Increases in salary and benefits and internal service charges are attributed to the current economy and inflationary impacts. For RDA Low -Mod Housing Fund (243), revenues received from loan repayments discussed above have been used for homelessness programs as approved by the Authority each fiscal year. The proposed budget for 2022/23 homelessness programs is $250,000. The SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond (249) is anticipated to have a balance of $2.9 million at June 30, 2022 and a $20,000 budget for 2022/23 provides for the ability to evaluate future affordable housing projects and programs. The decrease in expenses as compared to FY 21/22 is in large part due to the one-time purchase of a vacant property on Highway 111. 356 41 L A U I N TA 3ffi/l THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 358 CITY OF LA QUINTA HOUSING AUTHORITY FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET HOUSING AUTHORITY 2022/23 BUDGET SUMMARY * Gen,erail Fund amid RDA Low -Mod Housing Funid estimiaites udre for uniaipprapriaited reserves amid included annual Successor Agency Ilaain repaiymients ais aippraued with, the laist wind final recognized obligation paymient schiedule. The repaymienit for FY 2022/23 is $673,936. 359 W V' C ++ o O o 0 0 0 0 o O O o O O o p p o o O O O o o p - 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o M 0 O O O O O O O O O O p 0 0 �0 O m M M �0 CD l0 M m OlO W O O M� d O M u'] N O M M O O W UQ _ O U a O O a M N N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 O 00 O coo O O coo > N o 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O o O O O 0 O N M o C C 0m m C 0 O o O O m o O N N N o 0 01 01 O O Lr)of u1 � U)Lf N y v V N 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O o 0 O o 0 0 O O o 0 0 o0coo O o0 O ooO O O o O 0 IIOO OO LA O O N a o 0 o 0 O o 0 O 00 " +� rl rl O O N O O m O O r, LA 01 N N N a M M P% N �T rl N iE o i0 0 m m O N 00 0 O O `o t0 t0 M 0 CA (A M N+ N a,, N N m m m ^^ O N un N N ^ n n 0 ^ O N •; N N C 7 N .--i o IA P% n n m (Y1 '� 00 N 'y oL rn mm � ICI Ln N N ^ m m N N Ln O m N N N IA IA ID N n N N Q IA IA N N t0 10 qT a � w w 0 w N O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 O 00 O 0 0 0 O O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 z a o v o o o o o o 0 O o o w N 3 ko o 0 0 O o 0 O m " �0 �Cl �0 M u1 W O m m 00 Do N O Gm r, m m 0M a. N 41Ln N N N N N y ri L N L � 3 O U rj 41 Q N O 00 0 o 0 0 o o 0 O 00 O cc O 0 0 0 O O coo O a o o 0 0 O o C o 00O o O z N 3 0 0O O o 0 O o^ �" .� rl rl M II1 (n O CO 6 *i .� N 0� 0� m n n n M O N N N N N M M 00 O C O w o r, m ,.q N 00 O 0' M 0Ln o N N W N R N io It 0 00 00 N N N m M M wl wl IA N O +_+ O r-i m ' ' ri rl CO 00 00 a; 0� ,� ,� O M 0i N V mm N co ' M M " +� rl 0 0 O M ff O OD N NQ v m N q wl N N N m to to M M N .W N ro i+ it W i+ i+ 41 C Z5 ++ W W i+ O E a Ln O O -W -0 O O o O O r- O O O O O C >~ a a N~ F S F H a F F C I Z F H F F O= V . '� v Q L f'6 � V C i i ns i F U. i �1 i Q ` a p .� fu T 0 O Q 3 y o *' C O C O d W p 0 0 W O Z O- �� O r V N Gi L i--i i--i U J..i J-+ L N Gi VI L L Q) L N L W M O i--i i--i O a._ �m a a o a�oa �� C: �a >a a > �0. = a��a Fy (6 0) M w �= ro L i 41 0) +� U1 ro 0) 0) M D: a a�i a, w oti m a o a?i L L. y �, p m o 03 � co L o Co � �, o� � a O 03 � op ca o �4m- 0¢c�zJNcn 0 = Q�� O1 a 0� o E o°Cz o v, O o o¢c7 0 a a a+(4 Lm i f Q �,U) fa +_' p,i f Q ;i E E U) f =i i z z L. u o o�� o o o o c cm0 u r o a o o n o o a o I cm 3 o o 0 o M 3 fa M I y O O O N U) O 0J 3 M M a+ 3 01 U) 0) �� C y .--i M Q) S O y O 0) y cm LL O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O ORtrn 0mmmmma)0 ,i O�rn Vi 0�0�0 M p�OrnrnO N �o0po0 M M M O . i M 7 . i M M wl . i �"1 M O M O M c) n) M U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w w (D c p - Z) a� . CD cn w �I w t Ul) U O a O G a M N I N >I N M O N I N \ N N N \ N N O N N'. N ri N ; O N � I a ! w W 0 N W N z w' W rj C I w N O H Q N O \. z N (n O I D N' O 2 Tq N' N O' N O C H fu y O L Gl C_ Ip 0 O U y ro y = X NW L c p m n O M U O to Ln W L O O O O M O M N 00 0 0 0 0 0 rn It O N "o O N N Lr ti LT Lp n +' M N++ Z O UJ F LL +� +� Ln U Ln L N C i G y a� Q) (L) -oCL O O O m u a M O a O OZj U m Q CZ g a O cn c \ GJ = Q o O 3 41 m o a 0z o c O �000 Om d O .-I B y rn rn rn y O c vi -i yi a L L 0 0 0 L coo o M o 0 o M O N N N N a.- U N t C p1 C 0 0 L O 0 fu 0 Q 7 Ln a� N ro N V c c c O C: c fu +c !_ E � J C a� O' Ln CL)> , a ro Ln U O cL0 0 ro J In = O N a"' U rho N C 4 •L � C C y1 4-1 C O V Ili O "O 3: N C O L a-1 w C O . .4� 4-1 3 c v 4-1 � o o o 0 o Q N > = 4 0) ' U L ro C N OL ip E O aEi U L L O }' 0) (U M � N O QLU L L6 fa O t 4-1D O ' N C > Ln (o O c-r-I V C a C @? m 0 O L O c o - Q >. C @ fo > O > +' O O L L6 Ln U > ro L 2 •C Ln > N ^ Q N �' w N 7 _0 O L O I- i 0 M� O O V Q� O O O L o .4 O4' C a-.� a 4� CLO V = N w V 6 c Q- 0 Ln N V � Q O O 4' 4' o 0 N > � O v a- c N r6 L - o `~ -a a o U 2 N o> -a o O a c' � co U) N fa CD oC j O Ln NO Ln O o o M L) Nfa N L co E >- a >, LL Lll N N Q can fu E D - Ln N a cn L LL a c N Q M +L C p C O 4-1 7L Lv N �Oa+E0 H O Ln O C L O "0 L p ce O 7 O'O L. O F- J E N N Q1 J .— L > N a--+ C c))C r-I N C O -O O 0 O 0 LL ^ j cn C V a�-a C 0-0 Q w 4. L CJ1 C a..+ 9 _0 'L Lo C 'fin O = V C (o C -O O Ln i_ Ln C N O NU L n N O O o 0) 0 is o, 4 � Ln ° o fl- 4-1E c LA c �,= 0 J o c co �, E U) L �' Q �0 O 6 = p V Q. O 0 J LL (n aka Ln lll M Ln •C > M N Ln N4-J N-E, NCY L.e O W O O O M O co 0 0 0 )D O Ln O Q -i O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C r\ 0 0 0 0 lD 00 n .--i N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 g C) C) C 0 o c 0 0 O 0 O O 0 o O 0 1 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O 00 O r, 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 O i G R N N M r\ O) O to o O O S 00 It dl Ln 't O O Ln O N M O lD 't 00 N O O O 1 r,N to N lD N 00 lD Go O Ln N LA Ln i M Ln N N 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 O' Ln Ln C)O O O n Ln N C).--I •--i CD 00 00 M 00 It Ln CD 00 M 0) r,Ln 0) lD CDlD lD N N N W Ln Ln 00M O) M r,r,Lr) O n l0 l0 Lr) .--i 0) O N M CD.--i .� 't N M G O O N N N M ON D n M N 00 00 1 N ri ri i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 00 O 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O I M OJ N v lfl lD rn co LO o 0 0 O O o O ! '� � O N o 0 O i 00 .� r`n co .� Ln rh M o Ln o .� N M 00 to r) IT o O O 1 Ln N Ln N Ln to N OO Ln N "I Ln N Ln Ln 1 1 M Ln N N i I j O o 0 0 o o 0 0 o o 0 0 o o 0 Coco C O O O o 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 o 0 o o C)o 0 o C)O 0 0 O i M W N v lD lD 0) o O 0 0 0 O O O O - 0 N O O O 1 00 r rm 00 r Ln rn M o Lri o M n 0) o O O 1 Ln N Ln N M to N 00 Ln N "I Ul N M Ln s M Ln N N 1 1 O Ln O Ln M O O N O M Ln O lD N N M O (3) M 0) M N coo O N N N Ln Ln Ln S ,t O Ln O O O N� .-- .-- N O .--1 O C) lD O O P, O 1-1N O O O O lD �p �p �e It S O M lD . N N n Ln .- .� 0) r, r, ^ O .� O N Ln ^ O O O O Ln Ln Ln (`'1 O IT O N Ln M N Ln N .--i 07 N W r,N Ln N m O ,� O n N N Go Ln Ln M ri N n rl ri U i1 y y y Vl y N y Vl V) U +�+ ice+ Y q) M 4J N 41 Y 41 �, o w a 0 o — Ln a,UH 0 H 0 �H Ln S �L 0 raUF 0 F 0 F 0 H 0 F • H m 1�6 V N H L.L a o u u > y y q) .T w _ N i L u, 4J = Sl y 0 = a — cn v c m �+ _ t m fu c C Ln a ;� Ln V a c 0 'E a 0 W E L Iv (U c o) _ �, O E �' (V c p+ n O oC p1 a fu � ao a o c i Lf MI L U v O i J +' CaC n CC C .� C >, C C Ln L C U U U IS) o C Iy two L. Q) L m 06 Y O i Q 1 L a y 1 i Ln O :E .L H C C, t 0 N N m += N c v. U U LL ~~ Ln Q L Ln V) O >, Vl n L a, N C V 0. as a t T L6 +.+ V V a i w a, In 1 �, i• N x V +_ o W a o c o .L E U c o ~ m o= y +, -LI L V O O i y 11J N cr E ,V n fo +� O ro O L p E v o 0) L m w O p p W V wca > V a+ V) L L p 2 as+ N LO O a� a� N n N O fA fu a i LL6 C L = F L +S N +�+ �a(nUOaO�i�JJ�LnLn i =H0 �aw in Qa �a¢¢U G1 +1 m mIQ L 01 G1 m m cn V -i Ln O O O Ln -i N M V Ln O O -1 m V M lD M 1 = O O= f0 M V O= a) CD cm=_ = r,c c Z y L O O .-1-i .U)-i ON N N N N N N N N N 1 L .�-i lC +' rM V +' = L. 00 00 -1 V +' ym _. C. _ FA � ++ �� •N (np m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln ; Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln" C 0 0 0 0 to lD lD 0 0= •M - - GI -i -i Co 01 Orn 01 I,cy L 0) 0 0 _ N U -i -i -1 S ri r � Ic ri r r 1 = 1 M = 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 cb 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 OOrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn Ornrnrn NO)m) OrnrnrnO OO .-L ONo)N O Ln ' 1 O O O O O O .-1 �0 VC ri N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a 000 0O (n M m W = ' V m U 0 o � CD - La w N N > N o o O 0 0 O O 6 u') O M 0 00 o o O O O M in .1 0 \ N N N N 00 > O M N L r 3 N U N C r6 rlj }O O O O 00 O O O N a o o OL N= m O o 0 O NCLO N p - M D Ln 0 IA 0 0, '4 Il% 4-1 N N � � L ru O L L d V L N iE > O ' O O It N � O N O N q 01 L O N N Q M M 0 Q G 7 O H ry N O O O 00 O O 2 0 ;a OOO o0 O N +� w N= N N N O O N rl w Ul O m m oLn O m O O N C IA 0m P% LZ N X w 7 ' > U u La O N O O o 0 O O a 00 0 0 0 O O O N D N= M 0 M 0 M N O a O m N 1\ 0 0 P, L U N N IA h LA z c ti L Ln - a� O 2 C ri N N O 0 ^o t\ O O N IA 00 O ++ (3' M N N N u N V � C) N N l0 ru O Q of u1 O O 4, N to 7 N L y E y Ln 10 � A,j 10 0 f0 f6 0 C If) V OL F F ) 0 L u (A Ln H Vi •V c f0 N~N If. LLN r D Q W N i y c a G7 a�-� W (n a A W 0 S o w t71 NJ W Z _ U) y C ? Q O L.L 0 V w C i {ill ate,, O H t N ++ C 7 S. z 0 4� y a O fl. co m V y N p 0) _E V O a.i K WE Vl s +.+ O z y `0L^nO m�� a _ Q D d 3 coo 1p 1p n C C_ U U 7 ri 47 o o , o N O O O rn ON rn 2 O U N N N N fu M M Ln _0 C 7 LL 01 O 0 L C ll U Q1 V L ^ L C F 01 O C C ro U L. rho v a o UU O o 0 � 0o C L L a O LL aj QJ CD 0) It..+ p U `J a(n o rn >— 0 fp N ) 0c) O\a�C Qtn L v o U a a C C C CD .� O .. N N N f'i— E E E f6 N N C N N N U 1 f0 (6 fo f0 fa fO UIiUQ� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO fn l_ Ln Q +�+ C cn v L fl- m E L N N C O Ln OE L E O O Q U 01 0) C C 75 O O 22 (n E f6 a v C f0 Ln N U •L En fll c N E w 0) fD C fD C fy fs O E W O N ao C N fn Lu fn N L 0 O LL a-+ f0 � C � 7 N 0' C 3fa O J fn -C J_� L C O Z3 Z Lea 0 O w w l9 0 Z) CD 0 w O a O a M N N N O N 9 J_ Q H w 0 w (% 1 Z LU a X w r O 2 H D Q U Z_ O 2 a) o� c m r V 0 >N O M N ry N C N m M N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N N N N O N' O O m u +J 10 G Ln 41 0 Z � F F LL Q y V C m Z y C C O. cn N W O y @ Lm L C Cl J U)= O ++ C i O K O 0 W M O O Oy � yin J C Z O G ? O O O O M 00 O � O � N N C O LL U) F 4- C 0) C •3 � � O a) � > a) L — U) (6 N '6 L L C O •— w N_ C O 6 U a) -a0 L _ > -0 O — L — Q tp C M � ON a) M p E O {.P, L O ,,- Q O 41 0 O C � L U Q �— a) � L 3 C >, ro 4-, O 'C v � C � O Q 0) Q C C C � F _ O 0- 0 a) > 4-1 � � O a) m 4� L a) > L U O @ w 0) M C � O N O N O N a) a) � � L O w C C li7 O 0) U C � V) O O 4� O 2 a) U) O C 57 0 JLn -0 oC a) M U) N Ln to M rl- 9 J_ Q H w 0 w (% 1 Z w a X LU r O 2 H D Q U Z_ O 2 y ++ o 0 � Q O O C V m > N v o M ,i Ln L N N o r N W M N N N O N N N N 0 N N N \ N O N N N N O N' W W 0 0 CD O M ko O Ln o Lin o W W m W V M41 10 f6 Z O F F 0 LL �_ � .. LL C V) a) W O O CO C Z O C V) = a) C cv eve. O m 6� k N C G W y Q -a 'O ga Lo +1i J Q M C K V O 0 01 W I O y jA O O O O ce rl y m —1 Ln ocaCD 0 � a U o o :3 O O O LL 0 0 0 0 0 O o O rn rn Z O O N N N to C) 9 (a ro 4� (>6 L a) a) Q L O f6 L Ln O _0 41 � C U (6 w U 0) (6 � ro w a) O � C O � O � 6 M � 3 + r O C w O � L v S � C a) N U L m � 3 c ' Q C C M O Lf) Lf) 41 c ra (6 N C ra �a O >. U a) C > -0 m O 7 O �a > (6 '6 J C N L � Q 'O -a C (L) 4- L U 4) L41 a 41 C �U a) � L � (6 Q V) Q -0 O C -r 7 U w a) � U C L F- ro C J 41 LL (6 -0 c C O Uj Oco - U > o '^ � o C C p a) � Q C •C O U 7 U)�� U U) � aU 41 � Q, L N O O 110 M O PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 ,utyof LaQU i ICI "ta (' �11 Y COUNCILIKE 1F1FI I : June 7, 2022 1,.,AFT I IE IP( IN I,.,, t", IIEIINIID T' TIILIIE:� ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0010 AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2019-0003 (AMENDMENT V TO ANDALUSIA SPECIFIC PLAN), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2019-0002, ZONE CHANGE 2019-0004, SPECIFIC PLAN 2020- 0002, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005; INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCES APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2019-0004 AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0002; CEQA: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2021020310); LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58, NORTH OF AVENUE 60 AND EAST AND WEST OF MADISON STREET RJII C III i'I IE IN ID"I""' "I IIN A. Adopt a resolution making Findings and approving a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2021020310). B. Adopt a resolution approving Specific Plan (SP) 2019-0003, General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2019-0002, Zone Change (ZC) 2019-0004, Specific Plan (SP) 2020-0002 and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 2019-0005 for the Coral Mountain Resort project. C. (1) Move to take up an ordinance, by title and number only and waive further reading, approving Zone Change (ZC) 2019-0004. C. (2) Move to introduce an ordinance to approve ZC 2019-0004. D. (1) Move to take up an ordinance, by title and number only and waive further reading, approving a development agreement for the Coral Mountain Resort project. D. (2) Move to introduce at first reading an ordinance approving a development agreement for the Coral Mountain Resort project. E IECI,IT'i E SI II R • The Andalusia Specific Plan was part of a larger Specific Plan first approved by Riverside County (County), prior to annexation, which included Trilogy and the existing Andalusia areas. After annexation of 367 the land into the City, the original Specific Plan was split into what are now the Trilogy and Andalusia Specific Plans. • The proposed project consists of 929 acres of land located both west and east of Madison Street, south of Avenue 58 and north of Avenue 60. • The project consists of six applications to result in the development of a planned resort community to include 600 residential units, 150 hotel rooms, 117,000 square feet of commercial development, an artificial wave pool and open space lands (Attachment 1). • The City, as Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed project. That EIR determined that the impacts of the proposed project could be significant, and that although most impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels, impacts associated with aesthetics and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cannot be reduced to less than significant levels. • The Planning Commission recommended approval of the project, on a 4-3 vote, at its hearing of April 26, 2022; and also recommended, on a 5-2 vote, that the EIR be certified FISCAL 'I P C'T The project area occurs within south La Quinta, an area where the City receives no property tax until at least 2033. Without approval of Development Agreement 2021-0002, which mandates the payment of mitigation fees, the project will result in public safety and government costs of up to $1.6 million annually, as shown in Attachment 2. With the revenue generated by Transient Occupancy Tax from the hotel and short-term vacation rentals on the site, the project is fiscally positive, generating a net revenue of up to $1.9 million annually at build out. As the project is to be built in phases, the actual costs and revenues are dependent on which portions of the project are constructed in any given year. If only the residential portions of the project are built, costs will be high, and revenues low (assuming limited TOT generation from vacation rentals without the hotel). BACKGROUND Jib LY ' w The project area is bounded by Avenue 58 on the north, Monroe Street on the east, Avenue 60 on the south, and open space on the west. Land uses surrounding the proposed project consist of existing low density residential and golf course development, as well as the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) offices and substation on the north; Monroe Street and vacant lands on the east; existing residential, golf course and vacant residential land on the south; and Coral Mountain and vacant open space lands on the west. Lands north of the northwestern corner of the project, south of Avenue 58, are currently vacant but planned for low and medium density residential land uses. The larger 929-acre project area is only affected by the Specific Plan Amendment, which would remove the lands west of Madison Street from the existing Andalusia Specific Plan. The balance of the applications affect the 386 acres west of Madison Street. The project would result in the development of up to 600 residential units, 150 hotel rooms, 117,000 square feet of commercial development, a 16.6 acre artificial wave basin, 26.5 acres of "back of house" for temporary structures, parking and support for the wave pool and hotel, and 24 acres to include both passive and active recreational open space. The applications establish the backbone from which more detailed applications for sub -areas of the project will occur, including future Conditional Use and Site Development Permits, Tentative and Final Tract Maps, and other permits which may be necessary to implement the project. Each of the project's applications is described individually below, in the procedural order in which they must be considered, insofar as certain 369 applications, such as the GPA, must be considered before others to allow implementation of the project. e Andalusia Specific Plan (SP2003-06 The p 7) currently consists of 929 acres, which has been and continues to be developed east of Madison Street. SP2003-067 was conceived to support the creation of a master planned golf course community on both sides of Madison Street, with neighborhood commercial corners on both southwest and southeast corners of Madison Street and Avenue 58. SP2003-067 has been amended periodically to modify development standards and guidelines on the lands east of Madison Street, but no development has occurred on the west side. The Amendment to SP2003-067 (Exhibit A of Draft Resolution Approving the Specific Plan Amendment) would make no change to the Specific Plan on the east side of Madison Street, and would only remove the land west of Madison Street, and development standards and guidelines associated with those lands on the west side. From the perspective of the General Plan's vision, goals and policies, the removal of the westerly 386 acres will have no impact, as described in the Findings provided in Attachment 3. If the Amendment to SP2003-067 is approved, and no further action is taken, the lands west of Madison Street will remain designated for General Commercial, Low Density Residential and Open Space - Recreation in the General Plan. Therefore, Specific Plan 2019-0002 (Amendment V to SP2003-037) is consistent with the General Plan, and the Findings for approval can be made (Attachment 3). . biii .iiiiw, IIII IIIIIIII ° in iiiin iiim iun . 2 �„ 2 i�°hn 7", iiin .dp °°IIIN�n , iur� 2, �, The GPA reconfigures the existing land use designations of General Commercial, Low Density Residential and Open Space - Recreation, and adds a Tourist Commercial designation. The purpose of the ZC is to align the zoning with the General Plan land use designations to include Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, and Parks and Recreation zoning. As shown in Table 1 and the visual depiction below, the GPA and ZC will result in the commercial land use located on the same corner as currently designated, the Low Density Residential lands expanded in area, the golf course use eliminated, and Tourist Commercial land use added on the 386 acres. 370 Table 1 Existing and Proposed Land Uses General Plan/Zoning Existing Acres Proposed Acres General Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial 8.4 7.7 Low Density Residential/Low Density Residential 204.2 232.3 Open Space Recreation/Golf Course 171.9 0 Open Space Recreation/Parks and Recreation 0 23.6 Tourist Commercial/Tourist Commercial 0 120.8 As allowed in the General Plan (Administration Section), the Municipal Code (Chapter 9.230) and California State Planning law (Government Code Section 65300 et. seq.), the City maintains the General Plan to reflect its long term vision, and understands that this vision is not static. As described in the Land Use Element: "...the City faces a number of challenges in its future development. Lands within the City are limited, and its build out will likely see changes in the character of development, mostly tied to changes in the market and consumer demand. " 371 The proposed GPA changes the existing land use pattern for the subject 386 acres which were intended for a golf course community. The market and consumer demand have not responded to this type of development in the 20+ years the property has been in the City. The proposed GPA must be analyzed based on the General Plan's Goals and Policies. This analysis is provided below. In addition, the project EIR included a comprehensive analysis of the project's consistency with the General Plan on pages 4.10-15 through 4.10-24, which is incorporated herein by this reference, and included in Attachment 3. Goal LU-1 Land use compatibility throughout the City. Policy LU-1.2 All land use decisions shall be consistent with all applicable General plan policies and programs and shall uphold the rights and needs of property owners as well as those of the general public. Analysis: The GPA is proposed to support the development of a master planned community, similar to other master planned communities in the City. Other such communities include Tourist Commercial components, including PGA West and SilverRock. The community will be private, surrounded by a perimeter wall, and proposes land uses that, as analyzed in the project EIR, will not be visible or discernable from outside its boundaries. The GPA, due to the nature of the private resort community described above, will not negatively affect the general public. Goal LU-2 High quality design that complements and enhances the City. Analysis: The Specific Plan proposed in conjunction with the GPA includes comprehensive development standards, guidelines and graphics illustrating a high quality of design. Notwithstanding the proposed Specific Plan, should the GPA be approved and development under the Specific Plan not proceed, the City's Zoning Ordinance requirements include high quality development standards and guidelines designed to preserve the quality of development in all parts of the City. Goal LU-3 Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. Analysis: The proposed GPA would facilitate a master planned, free- standing community, consistent with the development which already exists in the area. The project as proposed will include perimeter landscaping, a gated entry, and resort commercial development in the center of the site, shielded from neighboring development. The project's perimeter and gate will provide identifying characteristics distinguishing it from its neighbors, 372 as has occurred in master planned communities throughout the City. Any development resulting from the GPA will be reviewed by both police and fire department staff to assure public safety. Should the proposed project not proceed, the General Plan land use designations would still likely result in a self-contained community, perimeter walls and gated access. Goal LU-4 Maintenance and protection of existing neighborhoods. Policy LU-4.1 Encourage compatible development adjacent to existing neighborhoods and infrastructure. Analysis: The proposed GPA will result in residential densities of up to 4 units per acre, consistent with the land use designations applied to surrounding development. The project proposed for the site would result in a residential density of 2.6 units per acre, which is consistent with the developed projects in the area, including Trilogy, PGA West and Andalusia. The amount of Open Space land resulting from the GPA will be less than that provided in surrounding developments, insofar as all three surrounding country clubs include golf courses. From the public realm, however, this difference will not be discernible, as the interior of the project will not be visible from public streets. The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA. The General Commercial land use designation currently exists at the corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58, and its reduction by 1f acre will not change the anticipated land uses or character of this portion of the site. Goal LU-5 A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. Policy LU-5.2 Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. 373 Analysis: The GPA will not, in and of itself, result in any particular type of housing. The Specific Plan proposed in conjunction with it, however, includes a broad range of attached and detached residential products which will broaden and add to the City's housing inventory. The GPA will not substantially change, as shown in Table 1, the amount of Low Density Residential land provided in the City for development. The range of housing proposed in the Specific Plan is consistent with market trends seen in the City in recent years, including clustered, smaller lot development, which is also typical of golf course communities in the City. Goal LU-6 A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City's residents and the region. Policy LU-6.1 Commercial land use designations shall allow a full range of retail, office, resort and institutional businesses in the City. Policy LU-6.3 Support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City's economic base. Analysis: The proposed GPA maintains the General Commercial land use at the corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58. This has long been considered in the General Plan as an appropriate location for neighborhood shopping, which would include a range of services and goods, based on the lack of commercial opportunities in this part of the City. As a result, this land use designation has been in place since annexation of the property, and its continuation, and eventual implementation, maintains the vision for the property. The proposed GPA will also expand the City's economic base by adding to its hotel room inventory, and provide new and different housing opportunities. The proposed project includes a DA which addresses the City's lack of property tax revenue in this area of the City, by requiring the payment of mitigation fees to offset the loss. This has been consistently applied to lands in this part of the City over the past decades, in order to assure that new developments contribute to the costs for public safety and other public services and do not represent a financial drain on the City. Goal ED-1 A balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. Policy ED-1.1 The Land Use Element shall maintain a balance of land use designations to address economic needs, meet market demand, and assure a wide range of development opportunities. 374 Program ED-1.1.b Development proposal review for commercial development shall include consideration of the proposal's compatibility with surrounding existing uses, its efficient and revenue -generating use of the land, and its compatibility with the City's Economic Development Plan Analysis: The wave basin project will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, broaden recreational opportunities for current and future residents and considers the proposal's compatibility with surrounding existing uses, as this is the first development in a master planned community. The proposed GPA, in and of itself, is consistent with other master planned communities in the City, and the vision, goals and policies of the General Plan. Regardless of whether or not the project associated with the GPA is developed, the land use designations and zoning designations proposed are consistent with the surrounding development in the area, the General Plan's vision for the area, and the goals and policies analyzed above and in Attachment 3. The proposed ZC is entirely consistent with the GPA. 1. Up to 600 residential units i.496 in the Low Density Residential areas ii.104 in the Tourist Commercial area 2. Up to 150 hotel rooms 3. Up to 60,000 square feet of Neighborhood Commercial uses at the southwest corner of Madison and Avenue 58 4. Up to 57,000 square feet of resort commercial uses in the Tourist Commercial area 5. A 16.6 acre wave pool and equipment to create the waves, maintenance and water treatment buildings and a water tank 6. 26.5 acres of "back of house" area immediately south of the wave pool, which can include parking, temporary buildings and facilities for operations and special events 7. 24 acres of open space on the south end of the property, to include trails, ropes courses, and passive and protected open space Table 2 depicts the distribution of land uses by PA. The project is proposed to be private, except for the neighborhood shopping center in PA I. 375 Table 2 Specific Plan Planning Area Land Use Allocation Planning Area Land Use Category Land Area (Acres) Non - Res dential Building (SF) Max Dwelling Units (DU) Max Hotel/Resort Units (DU) PA I GC 7.7 60,000 PA II LDR 232.3 496 PA III TC 120.8 57,000 2 104 150 PA IV OS-R 23.6 TOTAL 384.4 117,000 600 150 The neighborhood shopping center at the corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58 (PA I) will have access from both Avenue 58 and the project itself, so that residents and guests of the hotel do not have to enter the public street system to access it. It is proposed to include small-scale commercial uses as permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial Zone. Residential units can be either single family, attached or clustered product, condominiums or townhomes, with 104 resort residential units proposed on both sides of the hotel on small lots in the core of the project (PA III-D and III-Q. Pedestrian streets would be within resort residential area with easy access to the wave pool and hotel amenities. A boardwalk is proposed between the southern edge of the hotel and resort residential area and the wave pool, providing pedestrian access and views of the surf activities. The resort commercial development will occur at the hotel (PA III -A) and in PAs III-C and III-F. The wave pool itself would be located in PA-III-B. Only residents and hotel guests will be allowed to use the wave pool, and no public access to this facility will be allowed. Wave pool operations are proposed to be every day, 7 AM to 10 PM. Special events are requested 4 times per year, allowing up to 2,500 guests per day. Special events will require Temporary Use Permits which will include review by the Planning, Fire and Police Departments, and be issued by City staff. The Specific Plan includes permitted uses generally consistent with the permitted uses in the Zoning Ordinance, with specific additions. Please see Tables 3.1A, 3.2A, 3.3A and 3.4A of the Specific Plan for the uses which are explicitly added. These uses are specific to features of the project, and do not represent significant departures from the Zoning Ordinance, with one exception. The Specific Plan allows outdoor storage for the wave basin and back of house for special event supplies, tents and portable bathrooms (PA III-B and III-G, respectively). Although the use is not an issue if properly 376 screened in these areas, a condition of approval has been added which requires that "'fully screened from view" be added to Table 3.3A. The Specific Plan includes Project Design Features (Page 9 of Specific Plan) which promote non -vehicular circulation and energy efficiency, including pathways throughout the project, pedestrian streets in the resort residential area and solar systems. Trails, sidewalks and pedestrian streets are proposed throughout the project. The Specific Plan also includes all of the densities, intensities, development standards and design guidelines for the entire site. The development standards allow smaller lots and reduced setbacks for residential products, when compared to the Zoning Ordinance. The design guidelines provide recommendations for architectural style and materials. A modern architectural style is proposed and illustrated (see Design Guidelines starting on page 62 of Specific Plan). The quality of materials and style are consistent with the City's standards, and assure high quality development throughout the site. Individual SDP's will provide specific architecture for each phase of development. The landscape concept for the project proposes a desert -tolerant palette in five themes, and a specialized palette for the area adjacent to Coral Mountain, in response to concerns identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) regarding Peninsular bighorn sheep. This palette is more limited, and is consistent with the allowable plants adjacent to conservation areas for the sheep. The project is to be built in phases. A performance schedule is included in the Development Agreement (Exhibit A of Draft Ordinance adopting the Development Agreement), but market conditions are likely to control development phasing. Because of the project's phased development, there is a potential that large portions of the perimeter of the site could remain unimproved for years. A condition of approval is included in the Resolution which requires that all perimeter improvements, including walls, landscaping, and street improvements, be completed on the western project boundary, Avenue 58, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, with completion of the first development project for the site, which is anticipated to be the wave basin. In conclusion, the Specific Plan proposes standards and guidelines that are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, with variations that are appropriate for a master planned community, as conditioned. The style and quality of development that will result from its implementation are consistent with General Plan goals and policies. 377 iu The TTM is the first in what is likely to be a series of maps to implement the project. As shown in Attachment 4, the map subdivides only portions of the site, to include the wave basin, the resort residential units and hotel, the commercial parcel on the northeast corner, the open space in the southwest corner, and a small portion of PA II, to allow 27 single family home lots in the northwestern corner of the site. The balance of the site, particularly PA II, will require future subdivision for residential lots as those parts of the project are proposed. The TTM also includes the hierarchy of streets for the site, including the main access drive and entry gate, and a secondary access on Avenue 60. Additional interior streets off of the entry drive will be provided as part of the future maps for the residential areas. At the Fire Department's request, and in order to provide a secondary access to the residential lots on the northwest corner of the site, a temporary 24 foot wide roadway is provided. This will eventually be integrated into future maps to maintain the secondary access for the long term. The TTM is consistent with the Specific Plan, and with the Subdivision Ordinance, as conditioned. (LQMC) Section 9.250.020 allow applicants to enter into DAs with the City. DAs are frequently used for large projects that may take many years before ultimate build -out. DAs may vest development rights for a developer and ensure payments to a city of fees and other benefits as agreed upon by the parties. Courts have recognized DAs as granting the parties broad discretion to include agreed -upon terms and conditions, in addition to those required by state law, all of which may be enforced contractually. The adoption of a development agreement is a legislative act that must be done by ordinance. Here, the DA serves multiple purposes (Exhibit A of Draft Ordinance adopting the DA). 1. It provides the developer flexibility in phasing and development based on market trends, but establishes a performance schedule to provide the City with a level of certainty. 2. It allows short-term vacation rentals in accordance with the City's Municipal Code, and it proposes that the developer or developer - designated hotel operator or other project -wide property management company must be the "authorized agent or representative" for any residential unit that would hold a STVR permit, with the ability of a permit-holder/owner to petition for another "authorized agent or representative" if the developer -designated company does not adequately ensure STVR compliance. 378 3. It assures that the developer implements design features which are relied upon as mitigation for environmental effects. 4. It requires the applicant to dismantle and remove the wave making machinery and either (i) continue to operate the basin itself as a recreational lake amenity, or (ii) seek City approval for an alternative use, including obtaining a Conditional Use Permit, Site Development Permit, or other applicable entitlement, if the wave basin were to stop operations. 5. It requires the developer to obtain the approval by the City Manager and City Attorney prior to the adoption or amendment of CC&Rs, which would include (i) disclosure of and requirements for short-term vacation rental uses, and (ii) general and specific maintenance obligations. The DA is proposed to be in effect for a period of 50 years, which is the typical timeframe for DA's in the City. One of the essential components of the DA is its requirement for mitigation fee payments to offset the cost of providing services to the development, which will not generate property tax. The mitigation fee structure is reduced as revenues increase from Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), and is eliminated when the project reaches a threshold which assures the City that the costs of the project are covered. Enmimnimad i The City undertook an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for this project. The EIR analyzed all of the environmental issues required under CEQA, and found that with two exceptions, all impacts could be reduced to less than significant levels with the implementation of mitigation measures. In the case of Aesthetics (primarily associated with the elimination of public views of Coral Mountain) and Greenhouse Gas emissions, however, impacts remain significant and unavoidable, and there are no feasible mitigation measures available to reduce them to less than significant levels. The Draft EIR was made available for public comment for a period of 45 days. Nearly 100 public comments were received. The City has prepared responses to these comments, and amendments to the Draft EIR which are contained in the Final EIR document (Exhibit A of Resolution Certifying the EIR). That document was published on the City's website and made available to all those who commented on the document on March 10t", in advance of the Planning Commission's first hearing. It is important to note that the EIR has been prepared using technically sound and thorough analyses of complex issues. Many commenters disagree with the EIR's findings. Few provided substantial evidence, in the form of technical analyses or expert reports, in support of their comments. The CEQA process is one that relies on fact, not opinion. The City has prepared a factual EIR, supported by substantial evidence. It demonstrates that with two exceptions 379 (aesthetic resources and Greenhouse Gas emissions), potential impacts will not exceed the thresholds of significance that CEQA requires be considered. For example, there is no question that the proposed project will increase noise and traffic on and around the site. The EIR acknowledges that fact and considers whether those increases will exceed the City's standards, or thresholds of significance. In both cases, mitigation measures are provided to assure that these standards and thresholds are not exceeded. As for aesthetic resources and Greenhouse Gas emissions, potential impacts pertaining to these issues would not be able to be mitigated to less than significant levels, even with mitigation measures. As allowed under CEQA: "CEQA recognizes that in determining whether and how a project should be approved, a public agency has an obligation to balance a variety of public objectives, including economic, environmental, and social factors and in particular the goal of providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian. An agency shall prepare a statement of overriding considerations as described in Section 15093 to reflect the ultimate balancing of competing public objectives when the agency decides to approve a project that will cause one or more significant effects on the environment."" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15021) In this case, the City Council must consider whether the benefits of the project outweigh its significant impacts. As directed by the Planning Commission, Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations have been prepared (Draft Resolution Certifying the EIR). PLANKING Ct li' SS' I AC"I I' The Planning Commission considered the project at three public hearings (March 22, April 12 and April 26, 2022). Upon hearing all public testimony, and based on the Findings provided in Attachment 3, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the proposed project. As part of its motion, the Planning Commission also tabled the Site Development Permit (SDP) for the wave basin, and asked that it be brought back to them with the resort residential SDP, so that both could be considered in context. The Commission heard testimony and asked questions on a broad range of topics and concerns. The focus of discussion by the Commission members was on three subjects: lighting and glare, short-term vacation rentals and water resources. Lighting and glare: The public and Commissioners were concerned about lighting levels. The lighting analysis, including the comprehensive photometric analysis provided in the EIR, demonstrates that lighting levels on the ground :N will not reach beyond the property line of the project area, as required by City standard. The Commission also expressed concern regarding the light emanating from the tops of the light fixtures surrounding the wave basin. The applicant prepared additional simulations of the pole locations to determine whether they would be visible above the perimeter wall and intervening development on the site. This analysis determined that at 3 of the 4 studied locations, the glow of light at the tops of the 80-foot light poles would be visible. These locations include the Lion's Gate entry, north of the project site; the Andalusia entry, east of the project site; and from Avenue 60, south of the project site. Light would not be visible from Madison Street to the east of the project site. Short -Term Vacation Rentals: The Specific Plan allows for short-term vacation rental (STVR) use for all residential units (up to 600), subject to the regulations of the STVR Ordinance. The Commission discussed the project's inclusion of STVRs to be allowed for all of residential units within the site, versus limiting the allowance only within the area to be zoned as Tourist Commercial. Concerns of the Planning Commission included the nature of STVRs, and whether they were required to make the project financially viable for the City. The Commission ultimately did not recommend a change to limit STVR use. Water Resources: Substantial discussion and questions were associated with the provision of water to the project site. Some of that discussion included comparison of the currently approved Specific Plan's golf course use versus a project whose primary amenity is a wave basin. As described to the Commission, the Water Supply Assessment (WSA) prepared by the applicant considered detailed water demand calculations, which were analyzed in 2019 and reviewed and approved by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The analysis in the WSA is based on the requirements of State Water Code, and although it does consider long range planning conducted by CVWD for water supplies, including periods of drought and climate change, it does not address short term crises such as the current drought emergency, nor is it intended to. Ultimately, a majority of the Commission supported the project based on its estimated water demand. The Planning Commission ultimately recommended that the City Council approve the project, on a 4-3 vote. The Commission also directed staff to prepare the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations which are attached to this staff report for the City Council's consideration. PUBLIC IIICREVIEW The applications were distributed to City staff and outside agencies. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and 381 Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC 1401""' C III This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 27, 2022, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site, as well as those who had requested notice. Public comments received through June 1, 2022, are provided in Attachment 5. Any additional written comments received will be provided to the City Council prior to the hearing on June 7, 2022. Prepared by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. Project Information 2. Cost/Revenue Analysis 3. Findings 4. Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 5. Public Comments received from April 27 through June 1, 2022 Documents provided under separate cover, and available at www.laguintaca.gov/cmresort Coral Mountain Specific Plan Draft and Final EIR Planning Commission meeting recordings, staff reports, attachments and public comments for meetings of March 22, April 12 and April 26, 2022 382 ATTACHMENT 1 IR J IE "I , 1141��01ZMAI ,10114 CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0010, SPECIFIC PLAN 2019-0003 (AMENDMENT V TO ANDALUSIA SPECIFIC PLAN), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2019-0002, ZONE CHANGE 2019-00041 SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0002, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0002 APPLICANT: CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC REQUEST: CERTIFY THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT EIR (SCH #2021020310) AND ADOPT FINDINGS AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, APPROVE SP 2019-0003, GPA 2019-00021 ZC 2019-0004, SP 2020-0002, TTM 2019-0005, AND DA 2021-0002 LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58, NORTH OF AVENUE 60, EAST AND WEST OF MADISON STREET. APNS 764-200-076, 764-210-007, 764-210-028, 764-210-029, 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-0121 766-070-014, 766-080-001, 766-080-0021 766-080-0041 & 766-080-005 CEQA: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2021020310) GENERAL PLAN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, OPEN SPACE DESIGNATION: RECREATION AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, OPEN SPACE GOLF DESIGNATION: AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SURROUNDING NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM ZONING/LAND USES: DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, OPEN SPACE GOLF/VACANT LANDS, EXISTING COUNTRY CLUB SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/VACANT LAND, EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/EXISTING COUNTRY CLUB WEST: OPEN SPACE/CORAL MOUNTAIN, VACANT LANDS 383 ATTACHMENT 2 Coral Mountain Resort Summary of Major Revenues and Costs I. Introduction The following analysis has been prepared to analyze the major City of La Quinta revenue and cost categories associated with the development of the Coral Mountain Resort project. The project consists of a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map on 386 acres at the southwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58. The project would result in the development of 600 single family attached and detached residential units, 150 hotel rooms, a 60,000 square foot neighborhood shopping center and 57,000 square feet of resort retail development. The project is to be a private club, and with the exception of the neighborhood commercial shopping center, would not be generally accessible to the public. For purposes of this analysis, it has been assumed that maximum potential build out would occur. Should fewer units or square footage be constructed, costs and revenues to the City would also be reduced. The project site is located in south La Quinta, in an area which, when annexed, was encumbered by the County of Riverside's Redevelopment Agency. As a result, the City has not, and will not receive property tax on the project site until 2035. This analysis has been prepared to determine what costs and revenues will be generated by the project, absent property tax revenues. The applicant provided unit values and other assumptions used in this analysis, which are provided below. Phasing assumptions are based on the phasing provided in the project's environmental documentation, Specific Plan and other documents. The project is to be built in three phases. For purposes of this analysis, annual revenues and costs are calculated at build out of each phase, and build out of the project. The application materials provide for a build out year of 2026. Given the scope of the project, and La Quinta's historic residential absorption rates, this is likely an aggressive assumption for 600 residential units and a hotel. 385 Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis Corrected 3.4.22 Page 2 of 9 26 estate homes with an average price of $6 million per unit built in Phase 1. • 104 Surf Village homes with an average price of $2.75 million per unit built in Phase 1. • 470 homes with an average price of $2 million per unit built in Phase 3. 150 hotel rooms built in Phase 1. 10,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial, and 57,000 square feet of resort commercial development built in Phase 1. 25,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial development built in Phase 2. 25,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial development built in Phase 3. Hotel average daily rate of $350 per room. • Resort commercial Food and Beverage sales of $6.6 million annually. Resort Commercial retail sales of $5.5 million annually. • Short term vacation rental participation of 30% of 600 units. • Short term vacation rental occupancy rate of 25%. • Short term vacation rental rate of $800 per unit per night. It should be noted that the applicant's values and assumptions are generally consistent with conditions in La Quinta and the region in non -pandemic times. Hotel room rates and short term vacation rental (STVR) rates vary greatly in the City and region. Greater Palm Springs Convention and Visitors' Bureau reports support the hotel rates provided. STVR rates and occupancy are also consistent with the higher end of that market. It should be noted that until 2020, La Quinta did not track room nights or occupancy for STVR, and the use of 2020 year-to- date data would not be an accurate representation of occupancy levels in non - pandemic years. Therefore, the assumptions provided by the applicant have been used. Based on those assumptions, 180 of the residential units would be STVRs, which would generate a total of 29,565 room nights annually. This analysis is based on 2020 dollars. No inflation or cost of living adjustments have been made to either costs or revenues. Therefore, proportional increases in both can be expected over the build out period and beyond. Finally, this analysis addresses only major General Fund revenues. Additional costs and revenues will be associated with the project, such as the collection of increased gas tax, to offset road maintenance. Both the revenues and the costs associated with these restricted funds are limited, and will not substantially change the economic benefit or loss associated with the build out of the project. :. Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis Corrected 3.4.22 Page 3 of 9 II. Revenues Three primary revenue categories have been analyzed for this report: Property Transfer Tax, Sales Tax and Transient Occupancy Tax. As noted above, the project will generate no property tax for at least 15 years. Therefore, no property tax has been assumed, nor has Property Tax in Lieu of VLF been included. Revenue allocations are directly tied to the phasing proposed for the project. Revenues will begin in Phase 1, which includes the hotel and 130 residential units, as well as 67,000 square feet of commercial space. Phase 2 includes only the addition of neighborhood commercial square footage, and a corresponding increase in sales tax revenue. Phase 3, which includes an additional 470 housing units and the balance of the neighborhood commercial square footage, will result in a significant increase in revenues. Build out calculations are based on a stabilized project, relying on averaged resales of residential units for the life of the project. The following discussion summaries the result of the modeling conducted for this report. Detailed tables are provided in Appendix A. Property Transfer Tax The City receives Property Transfer Tax for properties sold within this area. The sales rates have been assumed based on average sales per year, both new and resale, during the build out of the project. Buildout assumptions, for every year once the project is fully developed, were also calculated. It should be noted that no property transfer tax was calculated for either the hotel or the commercial square footage in the project. These sales occur infrequently, are not predictable, and will only rarely increase the City's revenues during the life of the project. For purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that 130 units would be constructed in Phase 1. Of these, 104 units would be valued at $2.75 million, and 26 at $6 million. This represents the resort residential portion of the project located adjacent to the hotel and wave pool, as well as the 26 custom home sites located at the northwest corner of the resort complex. The balance of the residential development, 470 units, would be built in Phase 3 of the project, and upon completion, would represent build out of the proposed project. As shown in Table 1, at build out the project would generate $74,800 annually in Property Transfer Tax at build out. or-M Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis Corrected 3.4.22 Page 4 of 9 Table 1 Annual Prnnertv Transfer Tax Revenue Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Build Out Total Property Transfer Tax $44,880 $38,500 $127,600 74 800 Sales Tax The applicant provided annual retail sales and food and beverage sales estimates for the resort commercial complex, which includes the hotel and commercial village proposed in the southern quadrant of the project. No assumptions were provided for the neighborhood commercial development proposed in the northeastern corner of the project. For analysis purposes, the 60,000 square feet of commercial space was calculated separately, using Urban Land Institute regional calculations for neighborhood shopping center sales per square foot. For the proposed 57,000 square feet of resort commercial space, the applicant's assumptions were divided by the project square footage to generate sales per square foot. Consistent with the project description, retail space is assumed to be built in Phase 1 for the resort commercial, and in Phase 1, 2 and 3 for the neighborhood commercial component. The City receives 1% of the total 6% State sales tax rate, and an additional 1% generated by Measure G, which was approved by the voters in 2016. In total, therefore, the City receives 2% of most retail sales. On the basis of the assumptions described above, the project will generate $570,040 in sales tax at build out, as shown in Table 2. Table 2 Annual Sales Tax Reven Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Build Out Total Sales Tax Revenue 1 $276,523 1 $423.282 1 $570.040 1 $570.040 Sales tax was calculated for project generation only. In addition, residents will likely expend funds elsewhere in the City and region. Assuming the project has a high percentage of STVRs, as described above, the off -site spending associated with the project could be more characteristic of a hotel visitor, rather than a permanent or seasonal resident. If this is the case, spending will be more limited, and may occur almost entirely within the project. If the project is occupied by more permanent or seasonal residents, disposable income will be spent both in the project and elsewhere in the region. In order to assure a conservative estimation of revenues, therefore, no indirect sales tax generation is included in this analysis. 013:1 Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis Corrected 3.4.22 Page 5 of 9 Transient Occupancy Tax The City collects Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) for both hotels and short term vacation rentals (STVR). Hotels charge 11% in TOT per room night, while STVRs collect 10% per room night. Occupancy and rates, as described above, vary between the two uses. Hotels in the Coachella Valley, pre -pandemic, were experiencing annualized occupancy rates of about 68%, due in great part to the low occupancy levels in the summer months. This annualized occupancy rate was used to calculate TOT for the project's hotel. Data for STVR occupancy, as described above, is limited in both the City and region, especially since this is a relatively new phenomenon that all cities are experiencing. In La Quinta, approximately 6.5% of all single family units are currently used as STVRs. The City also has several projects built for vacation rentals, including Legacy Villas and Puerta Azul. As described above, this analysis assumed that 30% of the total residential units in the project would be used as STVRs, and that they would be occupied 25% of the time. Based on these assumptions, TOT revenues from the project would represent the single largest revenue source for the City. At build out, the project would generate $2.8 million in TOT revenue, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 Annual Transient Occunancv Tax Revenue Phase I Phase II Phase III Build Out Total Transient Occupancy Tax Revenue $1 735 849 1 $1 735 849 $2 829 480 1 $2 829 480 Summary of Revenues The major revenue categories associated with the project will result in a total of $3.47 million annually to the City at project build out. As described above, and shown in Table 4, more than 80% of these revenues are tied to Transient Occupancy Tax. An increase or decrease in TOT revenue would significantly affect the project's revenue stream. Please see Section IV of this report for further discussion of the impact of TOT revenues on City funds. OW Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis Corrected 3.4.22 Page 6 of 9 Table 4 Summary of Annual Revenues Phase I Phase II Phase III Build Out Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 Property Transfer Tax $44,880 $38,500 $127,600 $74,800 Local Sales Tax $276,523 $423,282 $570,040 $570,040 Transient Occupancy Tax $1,735,849 $1,735,849 $2,829,480 $2,829,480 Total Annual Revenues $2,057,252 $2,197,630 $3,527,120 $3,474,320 III. Costs As with revenues, this analysis considers the largest costs associated with new development as they would impact the General Fund. Restricted funds were not analyzed, but the costs associated with City-wide roadway maintenance and similar costs which are payed through restricted funds would be limited for a project of this size, and offsets by additional revenue categories, including Gas Tax, which the project will generate. Three major categories were analyzed for cost impacts: General Government, Fire Services and Police Services. In all three cases, a per capita cost was developed based on the current (2020/2021) adopted City budget expenditures for Police and Fire costs, and the previous year (2019/2020) adopted budget for General Government costs. The reason for the variation in budget year analysis was solely due to the deep cuts the City has implemented in 2020 for pandemic -related revenue shortfalls. The $10 million in cuts in personnel, facility expenditures and other General Government categories are expected to be short-term in nature, and do not reflect the level of service the City would provide in non -pandemic conditions. The 2019/2020 adopted budget, therefore, was used to calculate General Government expenditures. For Fire and Police expenditures, both are directly tied to contracts with the County of Riverside, which increase yearly and over which the City has no control. The current (2020/2021) aggregated costs associated with both services, for example, are 4% higher than the previous year (2019/2020), regardless of pandemic conditions. Therefore, the 2020/2021 contract costs were used to calculate per capita expenditures. In addition, hotel rooms were counted as residential units, to reflect the demand for police and fire services at hotel and resort facilities. The household size, 2.6 persons, was calculated based on Department of Finance 2019 estimates. Project population is assumed, at build out, to total 1,950 persons. 01Sol Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis Corrected 3.4.22 Page 7 of 9 Finally, to determine per capita costs, Department of Finance's population estimates for 2019, which total 401660 persons in La Quinta, were divided into the total budget amount for each category, as described below. The following discussion summaries the result of the modeling conducted for this report. Detailed tables are provided in Appendix A. General Government Costs General Government costs include a broad range of services, from business licenses to short term vacation rental permitting, and from recreation programs to Code Enforcement. The project, however, will not have an impact on all General Government activities, particularly where economies of scale occur based on the City's existing population. For this analysis, the following budget categories were included: Community Resources (which includes recreational programs, Wellness Center and Code Enforcement), and Facilities (which includes parks and public building maintenance, and limited street funding). The total General Fund costs associated with these programs is $7,671,900. On a per capita basis, this translates to a cost of $188.68 per resident. As shown in Table 5, the costs of General Government associated with build out of the project will be $367,926 annually. Table 5 Annual General Government Protect Costs Phase I Phase II Phase III Build Out Total Annual Costs of General Government I !M7.362 $137.359 $367.926 $367.926 Fire Service Costs As described above, Fire Service costs are based on a per capita cost of the 2020/2021 budget. The current cost for Fire Service contracting is $8,021,700. On a per capita basis, the cost is $197.29. Based on the project's build out population of 1,950 persons, the project will generate an annual cost to the City of $384,710 at build out, as shown in Table 6. Table 6 Annual Fire Service Protect Costs Phase I Phase II Phase III Build Out Total Annual of Fire Services $143,625 $143,625 $384,710 $384,710 019M Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis Corrected 3.4.22 Page 8 of 9 Police Service Costs Police Services represent the single largest expenditure for the City. The 2020/2021 contract with the County of Riverside totals $17,506,700. On a per capita basis, this translates to $430.56 per resident. As shown in Table 7, the total costs for Police Services at project build out will be $839,598 annually. Table 7 Annual Police Service Project Costs Phase I Phase II Phase III Build Out Total Annual Cost for Police Services $313,450 $313,450 1 $839,598 1 $839,598 Summary of Costs General Fund costs associated with project build out will total approximately $1.59 million annually at build out of the project, as shown in Table 8. Table 8 Annual Pro'ect Cost Summar wmaPhase I Phase II Phase III Build Out General Government $137,362 $137,359 $367,926 $367,926 Police Protection Services $313,450 $313,450 $839,598 $839,598 Fire Department Services $143,625 $143,625 $384,710 $384,710 Total Project -related General Fund Costs $594,437 $594,434 $1,592,234 $1,592,234 0�� Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis Corrected 3.4.22 Page 9of9 IV. Comparison of Revenues versus Costs 11 Table 9 compares the project's revenues to anticipated costs. As shown in the Table, based on the assumptions made in the analysis, the project will result in positive revenues for the City at build out. As the Table shows, the positive cash flow is entirely dependent on the Transient Occupancy Tax revenues projected for the project. Without TOT revenues, the project will be revenue negative, with the exception of completion of Phase 2, when the project will be revenue neutral. Phase 2 includes the addition of 25,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial space, and related sales tax revenue, with no increase in population density. The sales tax revenue generation makes up for the shortfall shown in Phase 1. At project build out, without TOT revenue, the project would be revenue negative at about $947,394 annually. Table 9 Summary of Proiect Revenues and Costs Phase I Phase II Phase III Build Out ANNUAL REVENUES General Fund: Property Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 Property Transfer Tax $44,880 $38,500 $127,600 $74,800 Local Sales Tax $276,523 $423,282 $570,040 $570,040 Transient Occupancy Tax $1,735,849 $1,735,849 $2,829,480 $2,829,480 ANNUAL COSTS General Fund: General Government $137,362 $137,359 $367,926 $367,926 Police Protection Services $313,450 $313,450 $839,598 $839,598 Fire Department Services $143,625 $143,625 $384,710 $384,710 SUMMARY OF REVENUES/COSTS: Revenues: Total Annual Revenues at Phase BUIIdOUt $2,057,252 $2,197,630 $3,527,120 $3,474,320 Costs: Total Annual Costs at Phase Build Out $594,437 $594,434 $1,592,234 $1,592,234 Annual Cash Flow at Phase Build Out $1,462,815 $1,603,196 $1,934,886 $1,882,086 Annual Cash Flow without Transient Occupancy Tax Revenue -$273,034 -$132,652 -$894,594 -$947,394 03*1 394 ATTACHMENT 3 FINDINGS Specific Plan Amendment 2019-0003 (Amendment V to Specific Plan 2003-037, Andalusia) 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, insofar as the land area remaining in the Specific Plan will continue to develop with the land uses shown in the General Plan Land Use Map, and consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. 2. Approval of the Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare, as development already occurs within this Specific Plan, and its build out will be consistent with that development. 3. Specific Plan 2003-037 is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties which are also Low Density Residential. 4. Specific Plan 2003-037 is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as development has occurred there, and will continue to build out as originally intended. General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 1. The amendment is internally consistent with those goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan which are not being amended, as follows (and as supplemented by Exhibit A): Goal LU-1 Land use compatibility throughout the City. Policy LU-1.2 All land use decisions shall be consistent with all applicable General Plan policies and programs and shall uphold the rights and needs of property owners as well as those of the general public. Consistencv: The General Plan Amendment is proposed to support the development of a master planned community, similar to other master planned communities in the City. Other such communities include Tourist Commercial components, including PGA West and SilverRock. The community will be private, will be surrounded by a perimeter wall, and proposes land uses that, as analyzed in the project Environmental Impact Report (EIR), will not be visible or discernable from outside its boundaries. The application for the General Plan Amendment has been made in compliance with the City's procedures and requirements, by a private 395 landowner. The General Plan Amendment, due to the nature of the private resort community described above, will not negatively affect the general public. Goal LU-2 High quality design that complements and enhances the City. Consistencv: The Specific Plan (SP2020-0002) proposed in conjunction with the General Plan Amendment includes comprehensive development standards, guidelines and graphics illustrating a high quality of design. Notwithstanding the proposed Specific Plan (SP2020-0002), should the General Plan Amendment be approved and development under the Specific Plan not proceed, the City's Zoning Ordinance requirements include high quality development standards and guidelines designed to preserve the quality of development in all parts of the City. Goal LU-3 Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. Consistency: The proposed General Plan Amendment will result in a master planned, free-standing community, consistent with the development which already exists in the area. The project as proposed will include perimeter landscaping, a gated entry, and resort commercial development in the center of the site, shielded from neighboring development. The project's perimeter and gate will provide identifying characteristics distinguishing it from its neighbors, as has occurred in master planned communities throughout the City. Any development resulting from the General Plan Amendment will be reviewed by both police and fire department staff to assure public safety. Should the proposed project not proceed, the General Plan land use designations would still likely result in a self-contained community, perimeter walls and gated access. Goal LU-4 Maintenance and protection of existing neighborhoods. Polic LU-4.1 Encourage compatible development adjacent to existing neighborhoods and infrastructure. Consistency: The proposed General Plan Amendment will result in residential densities of up to 4 units per acre, consistent with the land use designations applied to surrounding development. The project proposed for the site would result in a residential density of 2.6 units per acre, which is consistent with the developed projects in the area, including Centre Pointe, Trilogy, PGA West and Andalusia. The amount of Open Space land resulting from the General Plan Amendment will be less than that provided in surrounding developments, insofar as all 396 three surrounding country clubs include golf courses. From the public realm, however, this difference will not be discernible, as the interior of the project will not be visible from public streets. The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA. The General Commercial land use designation currently exists at the corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58, and its reduction by 1f acre will not change the anticipated land uses or character of this portion of the site. Goal LU-5 A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. Policy LU-5.2 Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. Consistencv: The General Plan Amendment will not, in and of itself, result in any particular type of housing. The Specific Plan (2020-0002) proposed in conjunction with it, however, includes a broad range of attached and detached residential products which will broaden and add to the City's housing inventory. The General Plan Amendment will not substantially change, as shown in Table 1, the amount of Low Density Residential land provided in the City for development. The range of housing proposed in the Specific Plan (2020-0002) is consistent with market trends seen in the City in recent years, including clustered, smaller lot development, which is also typical of golf course communities in the City. Goal LU-6 A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City's residents and the region. Policy LU-6.1 Commercial land use designations shall allow a full range of retail, office, resort and institutional businesses in the City. 397 Policy LU-6.3 Support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City's economic base. Consistency: The proposed General Plan Amendment maintains the General Commercial land use at the corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58. This has long been considered in the General Plan as an appropriate location for neighborhood shopping, which would include a range of services and goods, based on the lack of commercial opportunities in this part of the City. As a result, this land use designation has been in place since annexation of the property, and its continuation, and eventual implementation, maintains the vision for the property. The proposed General Plan Amendment will also expand the City's economic base by adding to its hotel room inventory, and provide new and different housing opportunities. The proposed project includes a Development Agreement which addresses the City's lack of property tax revenue in this area of the City, by requiring the payment of mitigation fees to offset the loss. This has been consistently applied to lands in this part of the City over the past decades, in order to assure that projects contribute to the costs for public safety and do not represent a financial drain on the City. 2. Approval of the General Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare because the community will be entirely self-contained and of high quality, and will be surrounded by homes, perimeter improvements and streets. 3. The Land Use designations are suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as it continues the pattern of master planned communities envisioned in the General Plan for southern areas of La Quinta. 4. Approval of the General Plan Amendment is warranted because changes in the market and in consumer interest in golf courses has changed, and alternative forms of recreation will expand the options for current and future City residents. Zone Change 2019-0004 1. The zone map change is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan, as described above and contained in Exhibit A. 2. Approval of the zone map change will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare because the community will be entirely self-contained and of high quality, and will be surrounded by homes, perimeter improvements and streets. MI 3. The new zoning is compatible with the zoning on adjacent properties as it continues the pattern of master planned communities envisioned in the General Plan for southern areas of La Quinta. 4. The new zoning is suitable and appropriate for the subject property because the property is essentially flat, and development will not occur on Coral Mountain or protected areas. 5. Approval of the zone map change is warranted because changes in the market and in consumer interest in golf courses has changed, and alternative forms of recreation will expand the options for current and future City residents. Specific Plan 2020-0002 1. Consistency with General Plan. The Specific Plan (2020-0002) is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan, as follows. Policv LU-2.1 Changes and variations from the Zoning Ordinance in a Specific Plan will be offset by high quality design, amenities and mix of land uses. Policy LU 2.2 Specific Plans shall be required for projects proposing the integration of recreation, tourist commercial and residential uses; and for all projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. Consistencv: The Specific Plan (2020-0002) implements the policies of the General Plan relating to site -specific development standards and high quality development, and provides flexibility for the development of specialized land uses to the site. 2. Approval of the Specific Plan (2020-0002) will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare because it will create an entirely self-contained and master planned community that will continue the pattern of master planned resort communities envisioned in this part of La Quinta. 3. The Specific Plan (2020-0002) is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties as it continues the pattern of master planned communities envisioned in the General Plan for southern areas of La Quinta. 399 4. The Specific Plan (2020-0002) is suitable and appropriate for the subject property because the property is essentially flat, and development will not occur on Coral Mountain or protected areas. Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 1. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, as amended, and implements the Low Density Residential, General Commercial, Open Space and Tourist Commercial land use designations allowed on the site. 2. The design and improvement of the Tentative Tract Map are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval to ensure comprehensive improvements and coordinated development. 3. The design of the Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Coral Mountain Resort EIR found that impacts to the environment could be reduced to less than significant levels, with the exception of aesthetics and greenhouse gas emissions. The City has determined that the benefits of the project outweigh the impacts to these resources, as identified in the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. 4. The design of the Tentative Tract Map and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as theproject will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality and other public health issues. 5. The design and improvements required for the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All roadway improvements, easements, if any and surrounding improvements will be completed to City standards. Development Agreement 2021-0002 1. The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan. -IN 2. The Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in and the regulations prescribed in the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan, and implements the Specific Plan's design features. 3. The Development Agreement is in conformity with the public necessity, public convenience, general welfare and good land use practices because it will create a revenue stream to assure that public safety costs incurred by the City for the project will be paid for by the project. 4. The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare, as it provides for the long term ordered development of a master planned community. 5. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values insofar as it will ensure that development occurring on the site will generate revenues and assure high quality development. 6. The Development Agreement will have a positive fiscal impact on the city by paying mitigation fees for services it requires, and additional Transient Occupancy Tax and Sales Tax revenues. 401 EXHIBIT A GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Land Use • Goal LU-1: Land use compatibility throughout the City. • Goal LU 2: High quality design that complements and enhances the City. • Policy LU-2.1: Changes and variations from the Zoning Ordinance in a Specific Plan will be offset by high quality design, amenities and mix of land uses. • Goal LU-5: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. • Policy LU-5.2: Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. • Goal LU-6: A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods andservices to the City"s residents and the region. • Policy LU-6.2: Maintain commercial development standards in the Zoning Ordinance including setbacks, height, pad elevations and other design and performance standards thatassure a high quality of development. • Policy LU-6.3: Support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City"s economic base. Consistency: The site components (neighborhood commercial, low density residential, resort residential, resort hotel, resort amenities, recreational amenities, and open space) are compatible with surrounding residential, open space, and neighborhood commercial uses and designations. Lands to the north of the project and south of Avenue are designated Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential. Development of these lands would be governed by the City's zoning standards, and would consist of attached or detached single family residential developments (two to four units per acre for Low Density Residential), and medium density neighborhoods (four to eight units per acre). This development is expected to be consistent with and similar to the uses proposed within the project because the project proposes a maximum of 496 low density residential housing units on approximately 232.3 acres, as well as a maximum of 104 resort residential units, on approximately 40.5 acres, which would be similar to the density and intensity of development allowed under the General Plan. The project is separated from adjacent uses by surrounding arterial streets and physical topographic barriers, such as Coral Mountain. Off -site development includes the connection to an existing Imperial Irrigation District 402 (IID) substation to provide electricity to the project site. The off -site improvements would not impact land use of the off -site areas. The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan includes detailed design guidelines in Section 4 of the SP to guide high -quality development throughout the Specific Plan area. The project includes both neighborhood commercial and tourist commercial land uses which will generate revenue and create employment opportunities. The proposed project would increase services associated with tourism and neighborhood commercial uses. The project proposes housing of varying types and sizes with access to resort and recreational amenities, thus enhancing housing choices for potential buyers. Planning Areas II and III will offer a broad range of housing options on the site. Planning Area II, designated as Low Density Residential, anticipates detached or attached residential dwelling units with densities ranging from 0.8-4 dwelling units per acre. Planning Area III proposes the development of resort residential dwelling units with densities ranging from 2.5-2.8 dwelling units per acre. Consistent with Policy LU-5.2, Goal LU-6, and Policy LU-6.3, the implementation of the Tourist Commercial land use designation and the associated development of a recreational facility and hotel will promote the continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in La Quinta by providing resort, recreational, commercial, and residential land uses on the 386-acre property. Additionally, the residential uses will incrementally increase demand for commercial goods and services in the region, thus enhancing the economy. Circulation • Goal CIR-1: A transportation and circulation network that efficiently, safely and economically moves people, vehicles, and goods using facilities that meet the current demands and projected needs of the City. • Policy CIR-1.12: As a means of reducing vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City, the city shall pursue development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. • Goal CIR-2: A circulation system that promotes and enhances transit, alternative vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian networks. • Policy CIR-2.2: Encourage reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours of delay by increasing or encouraging the use of alternative modes and transportation technologies, and implement and manage a hierarchy of Complete Street multimodal transportation infrastructure and programs to deliver improved mobility and 403 reduce GHG emissions. • Policy CIR-2.3: Develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi -use paths and places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas with potential for increased pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart/NEV modes of travel. Consistency: The project proposes a private circulation system to provide safe and efficient passage for pedestrians and motorists throughout the site. The project proposes a multi -modal circulation system, aiming to decrease automobile dependency by providing transportation facilities for a variety of user groups including motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers of electric vehicles. The project proposes a private circulation system that will safely accommodate both vehicles and pedestrians with shared low -speed, low -volume internal streets. The multi -modal transportation system will consist of off-street bicycle and pedestrian paths/routes, sidewalks in higher traffic areas, enhanced pedestrian/bicycle crosswalks, pedestrian and multi -use paths and streets, traffic calming methods, short street segments with frequent caution zones and stopping points, golf cart and other alternative forms of personal transportation. Livable Community • Goal SC-1: A community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents. Consistency: The project includes elements to address the goal of the Livable Community Element, which is intended to assist the City in developing a more united community through resource conservation, built environment enhancement, promotion of alternative forms of transportation, and improvement of community health. The project and Specific Plan are consistent with this goal by promoting a high -quality mix of uses that will contribute to the built environment, promote walkability in the resort center of the project, and provide opportunities for active recreation. Economic Development • Goal ED-1: A balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. • Policy ED-1.1: The Land Use Element shall maintain a balance of land use designations to address economic needs, meet market demand, and assure a wide range of development opportunities. • Goal ED-2: The continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in the l• City. Consistency: The project proposes a resort with up to 150 hotel keys, a water - based active recreation amenity, and resort residences that will expand tourism opportunities and promote fiscal stability. Additionally, the residential use will incrementally increase demand for commercial goods and services in the region, thus enhancing the economy. The project promotes the continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in La Quinta by providing resort, recreational, commercial, and residential land useson the 386-acre property. Parks, Recreation and Trails • Goal PR-1: A comprehensive system of parks, and recreational facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. • Policy PR-1.4: The design and construction of parks and recreational facilities shall comply with all the development standards that apply to privately constructed facilities. • Policy PR-1.6: Encourage patterns of development that promote safe pedestrian and bicycle access to schools, public parks, and recreational areas. Consistency: The project designates areas set aside for recreational open space uses, as well as a water- based active recreational amenity that will provide recreational opportunities currently not available in the City. Additional open space will be scattered throughout PA II. Planning Area IV proposes approximately 23.6 acres of land zoned for Parks and Recreation (PR). This Planning Area will include active and passive recreational activities such as hiking trails, biking routes, and a ropes course/zipline. Housing • Goal H-1: Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. • Policy H-1.1: Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. • Goal H4: Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties. • Goal H-6: Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. 405 Consistency: The project proposes the development of up to 600 attached and detached dwelling units with densities ranging from 0.8-4 dwelling units per acre, thus contributing to the City's market rate housing stock. The project will complement the surrounding residential communities. Development of resort, neighborhood commercial, recreational open space, and residential uses will add value and amenities to neighboring communities and the City. The project promotes water conservation through the use of drought tolerant plant materials and water efficient irrigation techniques. The project will comply with all City and water district regulations and building codes for water conservation, energy efficiency, and building standards. The project will also comply with all applicable green building requirements. Water Resources • Goal WR-1: The efficient use and conservation of the City's water resources. • Policy WR-1.1: Support the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses. • Policy WR-1.3: Support CVWD in its efforts to expand tertiary treated (i.e., reclaimed) water distribution. Consistency: The project promotes water conservation through the use of drought tolerant plant materials and water efficient irrigation techniques. The project will comply with all City and Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) regulations and building codes for water conservation. Additionally, recycled water will be used for common area irrigation for landscaping. The Wave Basin provides a recreational amenity to support the proposed resort and residential uses, and does so with substantially less water demand than required for alternatives amenities, such as an 18-hole golf course. Open Space and Conservation • Goals OS-1: Preservation, conservation and management of the City's open space lands and scenic resources for enhanced recreational, environmental, and economic purposes. • Policy OS-1.1: Identify and map lands suitable for preservation as passive and active open space. • Policy OS-I.Z: Continue to develop a comprehensive multi purpose trails network to link open space areas. Consistency: The project includes significant open space amenities, including the protection of Coral Mountain through an Environmentally Sensitive Area. The project incorporates connections to the publicsidewalk and public trail system -M for convenient walking, jogging, and biking activities. Planning Area IV proposes approximately 23.6 acres of Open Space Recreation land uses, in which low - impact active and passive activities, such as hiking, biking and ropes courses are permitted. PA IV will be retained largely as natural desert land. The perimeter pedestrian improvements will connect to the surrounding community. However, the project will not connect to existing trails or open space areas, outside of the project boundary, because there are no existing public trails in the immediate vicinity of the project. Noise • Goal N-1: A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and resort character. • Policy N-1.1: Noise standards in the City shall be consistent with the Community Noise and Land Use Compatibility scale described in the Noise Element. • Policy N-1.2: New residential development located adjacent to any roadway identified in Table IV4 (in the Noise Element of the GP) as having a buildout noise level in excess of 65 deA shall continue to be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. • Policy N-1.3: New non-residential development located adjacent to existing residential development, sensitive receptors or residentially designated land, shall be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates that it will not significantly impact the adjacent residential development or residential land. • Policy N-1.5: All noise impact analysis will include, at a minimum, short-term construction noise and noise generated by the daily operation of the project at build out. Consistency: The project establishes residential, resort residential, resort, recreational, and neighborhood commercial uses with compatible noise levels in an existing residential area. These uses maintain and enhance the City's residential and resort character and will be subject to the City's noise ordinance. Noise levels on Avenue 58 and Madison Street are not excessive due to the low traffic volumes, and the project will be buffered by a perimeter community wall. 407 '1: mp.... pal J� ar a A wen e r'� m M y w r P o i w � A " ry M1 Oft i" !� V r ?w a r*001 a p v .a »�*„a.m"nrn^amarowwrwwunmwxnw+rnw~rwMrad.'�'r'wl"rta °nwu' r< NVY 25, 2022 ms� Nicole Com"m1firll.7, 11anner Coy of I m (Adm"I 78495 CaHc bunpb) La (Ndw CA 02253 13mm NK CUNK As you know. the April 12. 2022 letter ftxnl) Mitchell 'J'Sa� , ils well as the Aj�,)vd 6,.2022 letter fn-n-n SX'APII volach2d thereW raised addhimml argurnem; reghling We udetpiacy of0c, EIR concerning Air Ottality, and GIU) caflssiotm Thesarg Q , reviewed and gunients have he ri reslynded to I the atutched letter Iforml lasecl) Qwvs),ii at (Jrban Crcssroads, �vho prepat-Qd du.', expert Air Quahry and GHG Hinisshms tcuhnkal repirts W IS Draft EIR, A descrip6m of the cxpvt1ise, ajrd ccoinevuhns of NAr QnM and I 4hmi (Younwds are mcluded in those technical. rep("Is, wldch tiara iiwItide(I in Ille 1""'JR. As explIked in nnue dMaH in the amehed expert opbrr letteq the, asscrWis in MUM and SWAUII-." letlers do not raise any Nows Owl were not Mequately 2malyzed in the PIC rhu do Mey Imovide aRy m0mianlial, m4derace ofany aem,- or stImUnMy more sevc.re envircintuelval el-Tem than vvereddsclosed am! amilyzed in the U it. I fere is a strmniarj'y of('Mr. Qrrr(,!-,J,n's o,%p,ert determinatkinm 1, The project. desipi Humes (PD14) WkWed as pa' i of Ow pr"ect and mduaWd in the air quahyf corrqmicr mWeling vvere Forpert, m1dressal ns IMFv and not nrifigalion rllermvures, becai ise they ure pan ofthe projeel be'ling av'l�'dyze(L cnn:�,istent with iridustry best prackcs As you ary axvare' thcs'o 1"I.A.'s also lacing 111µRIC enk-'4recablcm to thic same, emcnr mitigadon meammes, Mugh the 1 (QmhaUI.o the WE in the VAPE Wer. Lhe prtleel's operatMal air qualiQ emissions %vere jiroptr[y Lit-iat'ilified and mWarted, hi kie Air Qwality I-eport "Ind 1 t",111 [IR, hCUMM each subsequern phoses of the prqjeo, was cvahxucd [.'�y incWhIing the cinksbms hvni dmi phne and aril pdor phases (Ke. Te 11mrse 3 analyis hwhWad the Wal emblionsIbm Phases 1, 2 and 3), 411 Ms. Nicole Griste, Consulting Planner City of La Quinta May 25, 2022 Page 2 3. The Air Quality analysis properly disclosed and analyzed the potential health risks associated with the project's construction and operational emissions by quantifying those emissions and detennining whether they would cause any adverse effects on sensitive receptors in the area. A specific construction or operational health risk assessment (HRA) for diesel particulate master, as requested by SWAPE, is not required or appropriate for this project under both SCAQMD and City of La Quinta standards because the project will not generate sufficient diesel particulate matter to cause any potential adverse effects. 4. All feasible and appropriate mitigation measures suggested by SWAPE (which are the standard list of measures identified by SLAG) have already been incorporated into the project as enforceable PD s because these are the same measures considered by Urban Crossroads in the GHG emissions technical report, which incorporated all of the feasible measures that will substantially reduce the pmject's GHG emissions. Neither the Tsai or SWAPE letters identify any additional feasible measures that will substantially reduce the project's remaining GIG emissions. Mr. Tsai submitted an additional letter on April 2.6, 2422, the day of the flual Plannhig Commission Bearing, which raised additional arguments regarding the analysis of hazards and hazardous materials in the BIR. Specifically, the letter asserts that the EIR is deficient because it does not include a Phase I Env ironrnentaI Site Assessment (ESA) and because it does not include an analysis of"contaminants of ernergirrg concerns" or "CEC," specifically including "per- and polyfluoroalkyrl substances_" r_ Tsai did not, however, include any expert evidence in support of these arguments, nor did he provide any legal authority for the proposition that such additional analysis is legally required under CEQA. In response to these new arguments, please note that CEQA does not require an EIR to include a Phase I ESA, nor does it require an analysis of CECs, such as polyfluoroalkyl substances. Rather, the relevant question under CEQA is whether the project site is "included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code § 65962.5," and if so, °`would result in a signifrcauxt hazard to the public or the environment." See CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Checklist on Hazards and Hazardous Materials. As acknowledged in Mr. Tsai's letter, the EIR does contain this information, confirming that the project site is nox on such a Iist of hazardous materials sites. With respect to the possibility of chemicals remaining from prior agricultural operations on the project site, the Draft EIR also specifically notes that all such agricultural operations ceased more than 25 years ago and there is no evidence of any chemical residue on the project site. See Draft EIR, at pp. 4.8-24 — 4.8-21. 412 Ms. Nicole Criste, Consulting Planner City of La Quinta May 25, 2022 Page 3 Please further note that CECs like polyfYuoroalkyl substances are not listed by the EPA as hazardous materials, and therefore, are not required to be analyzed under CEQA. Moreover, for this project and project site, theme is no evidence whatsoever that any CECs are present on the site or will be used in connection with the project. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like any further information addressing these I I"' hour asseilions made my Mr. Tsai. .Please include this letter and the attached expert opinion evidence from Mr. Qureshi and Urban Crossroads in, the administrative record for this project. ly y r James 1D_ Va ghn, Esq. JDVlec Encls. cc: Cheri Flores Michelle Witherspoon Asia Lee John Gainlin 413 URBAN CROSSROADS May 25, 2072 Mr. James D_ Vaughn, 115q. Stowell, Zeilenga, Ruth, Vaugn & Treiger LLP 4695 Ma cArth ur Court Newport Beach, CA 92660 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT RESPONSE TO UffiRE COMMENTS Mr. James D_ Vaughn, Esq., 12641-12 RTC SWAPS Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the fallowing response to comments received on the DEIR for the proposed Coral Mountain Resort development (referred to as Project), RESPONSE TO AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS COMMENTS RESPONSE I-, l'AILURE TO INCI. W12E PDFSAS MITIG MQN MEASURES The commenter alleges that the DEIR"s air quality analysts is Inadequate since ail PDFs descrlbed in the DEIR should be included as mitigation, The PDFs included in the DEIR are part of the Projects design, and therefore, are not Identified as mitigation measures. This Is consistent vuith best practices for Air Quality studies because the PDFs are part of the project and thus are induded in the air quality computer modeling, h+lftigation measures are applied to the computer modeling results, If necessary and feasible, to reduce significant impacts to a level of less than significant However, the City of Le Quinta has required that the PDFs be made fully enforceable to the same extent as mitigation measures through; incorporation into the project Development Agreement (see ❑eveloprrent Agreement Section 3.3 and Exhibit C). The praject's mitigation measures are likewise made enforceable through the Development Agreement (see Section 3.4 and Exhibit D). Therefore, in this case the PDFs are equally effective and enforceable as the project mitigation measures. RESPONS9 2: FAILLIRE TO IDENTIFY A POTENTIALLY SIGNIEICANT AIR QUALITY IMPACT The commenter alleges that the DEIR`s operational air quality emissions are not adequately reported and should be summed by phase and corn pared to the SCAQMD threshold of 55lbslday for VOC and NO. The commenter is incorrect that the emissions reported 1n the DEIR by phase should t)e additive. As shown in the DElR and underlying technical appendix, the modeling -for each subsequent phase of operations, includes the prfor phases) of emissions. Far example, Phase 2 emissions totals represent the total emissions from Phase 1 + Phase 2, and phase 3 emissions totals represent the total emissions from Phase 1 + Phase 2 + Phase 3 actiulty. �'ir+.I '.3!•i!I i `,!J14s` ill { ?":::L'41�1311F:.;p11. 1.1':lf17}1) I �1':'4ifi�,af l`I:,.'1 E�a'Fe.i�iT'.�'k3a;4�5.C411t 414 Mr. omc-i lJ. V�i Eapn, S oc ,Y ot1, r.1?i!F-n,;,?. RIJt�1, V ILQ'-F) c"., 'Tr[ : ,c�: €.l.P Moy 2', ?0112 P,4g.c,2uI`r Additionally, SWAPE references an inapplicable threshold of SS Ibslday for VOC and NOx emissions. This threshold does not apply to the Project, which is located within the Coachella Malley region and has a separate threshold of 100 1bslday for IOC and NOx for operations, as summarized on Table 4.2-2 In the DER (see Page 4.1-13). As such, no changes to the DEIR are required. The commenter alleges thatthe D E I R fails to discuss health risk Impacts associated with the Projects construction -related and operational related toxic air contaminants (TACs). The DEIR and underlying technical Air Quality Report evaluate both construction and operational emissions thatwould be generated bythe proposed Project and could affect nearby existing sensitive receptors. binder SCAQMD standards and guidelines, construction based HRAs are not required for this type of development project. Instead, as directed by SCAQMD, the local significance thresholds (LSTs) are used to evaluate potential health impacts from particulate matter emissions to sensitive receptors in the project"s vidnity from project construction. As shown i n the DEIR, local construction and operational related emissions would not exceed SCAQMD LST thresholds, and therefore, would not create any significant health risks to nearby sensitive receptors. Moreover, an HRA analyzing the project's construction emissions of diesel particulate matter is not warranted for this project• The primary purpose of an IRA is to determine long-term health risks, such as cancer risks aver, for example, a 30-year residency or 70`year lifetime. As discussed in the DEII, construction of the project would take approximately 6yea rs. Exposure ofsuch duration would not create long -terra health effects to adjacent receptors. Additionally, the City of La Quin#a follows SCAQMD guidance for air quality analysis, which does not currently have any published guidance on addressing construction health risks from diesel exhaust. Urban Crossroads, Inc. has also reviewed the referenced OEHHA Guidance Manual to determine applicability to this project of the use of early life exposure adjustments to diesel particulate matter (DIRIA) emissions resulting from construction activity. As explained below, we have determined that this approach suggested in the comment is not applicable to the analysis of the short term emissions that would be generated during construction of the project. The determination ofwhether a construction HRA is warranted is dependent on whether -or not early life exposure adjustments applytu DIRM emissions resulting from construction activity. The following disouss!on ou#lines the substantial evidence to support why early life exposure adjustments are not appiicable to construction QPM emissions and, therefore, a construction health risk assessment is not required or warranted due to the short-term duration of construction activity (long-term exposure of 30 years of activity are typically used to generate risk estimates, as referenced in the corn+Went). For risk assessments conducted under the auspices of The Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588), OEHHA applies specific adjustment factors to all carcinogens regardless of purported mechanism of action. However, the applicability of AB 2588 is limited to hitp:} foehha .ca_gavf airfhot_sp at s�hotspotsL015. h t ml 12641-17 RTC SWAPS 415 SLOw<dt zesiR,1A11.Veit to ex i;r':f'C'r I � F1 P ` commercial and industrial operations. There are two broad classes of facilities subject to the AB 2588 Program: 1) Core facilities and 2) facilities €derit1fled wlthin discrete industry -wide source categories. Core facilities subject to AB 2588 compliance are sources whose criteria pollutant emissions (particulate matter, oxides of sulfur, oxides of nitrogen and volatile organic compounds) are 25 tons per year or more as well as those facilities whose criteria pollutant emissions are 10 tons per year or more but less than 25 tons per gear - the exhaust €GPM em fissions from the project are sulostantlaIly less than 14 tons per year. Industry -wide source facilities are classified as smaller opera ton5 with relatively similar emission profiles (e.g., auto body shops, gas stations and dry cleaners using perch Iuruethylene). The emissions generated from off -road mobile sources, such as construction equipment, are not classified in AB 2588 as core operations nor subject to industry -wide source evaluation. In comments presented to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Governing Board (Meeting Date. June 5, 2015, Agenda No. 28) relating to toxic air contaminant exposures under Rules 1401, 1401.1, 1402 and 212 revisions, use of the DEHHA Guidelines specifically related to the a p pi ic a b I li ty and use of early -life exposure adjustments far projects subject to CEQA, it was reported that=: 'The Proposed Amended Rules are separate from the CEQA significance thresholds. The SCAQMD staff is currently evaluating I ow to implement the Revised DEHHA Guidelines under CEQA. The SCAQMD staff will evaluate a variety of options on haw to evaluate health risks under the Revised DEHHA Guidelines under CEQA. The SCAQMD staff will conduct public workshops to gather input before bringing recorn me nd ati on s to the Governing Board. In the interim, staff wlII coat€rue to use the previous guidelines for CEQA determinations," To date, the SCAQMD, as a commenting agency, has not conducted public workshops nor developed further looney relating to the application of early -life exposure adjustments utilizing the CEHHA Guidance Manual for projects prepared by other pubIIcllead agencies subject to CEQA, As a result, it is our recommendation that health risk assessments rely upon U.S. EPA documentation when evaluating the use of early life exposure adjustment factors (Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early -Life Exposure to Carcinogens, EPAf634/R-f)Q3F) wherein adjustment factors are only considered when rardnogens act "through the mutagenlc mode of action." A mutagen is a physical cr chemical agent that changes genetic material, such as DNA, increasing the frequency of mutations to produce carcinogenic effects. The use of adjustment factors is recommended to account for the susceptibility of producing adverse health effects during early life stages from exposure to these mutagenit compounds. In 2006, U.S. EPA published a memorandum which provides guidance regarding the preparation of health risk assessments should carcinogenic compounds ellclt a mutagenic mode of action (USEPA, 2OW), As presented in the technical memorandum, numerous compounds were identified as having See Response to Comment L13, PapA-7 and AA of the Aune 5, 2615 hoard meetlelgAger4a Ho- 2$_ http;f/www.agmd.gov/docs/de(ault• souroe/Age n das/Gouernl ng-B card j2415/2a15-iunl-029 3 United States Eiw6o4imerital Protectior+Agency, M. Mernorandurn —Implementation of the Cancer Guidellnesand Accompanying Supplemental Gvidarre • Silence Pndicy CaunclI Cancer Guidelines implementation Workgroup CommLinication 11; Performing Rlsk Assessments that include Carcinogens Cescribed In the Supplemental Guldance as hWne a Mutagerie Mryde or ACli*n_ 124541-71 Rres1"u,Pa 416 � lI . )'gym }', D. W.I1�"rin, V sil. Skr}vjeil 7(-)ilem,i), Iil.ah. 'rr(, -r i_LP l 2 _}, 2022 0 22 a mutagenic mode of action. For diesel particulates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their derivatives, which are known to exhibit a mutagenic mode of action, comprise < 1% of the exhaust particulate mass. To date, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reports that whole diesel engine exhaust has not been shown to eliCit a mutagenic mode of action (USEPA, 2018"), Additionally, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) which Is charged with protecting individuals and the environment from the effects of toxic substances and responsibie for assessing, investigating and evaluating sensitive receptor populations to ensure that properties are free of contamination or that health protective remediation levels are achieved has adopted the U.S, EPA's policy In the application of early -life exposure adjustments which is consistent with the methodology considered herein. As such, incorporation of early-Ilfe exposure adjustments for exposures to DPM emissions in the quantification of carcinogenic risk for construction of the proposed project is not warranters. Given that there Is na available guidance that has been adapted by SCAQMD for CEQA purposes and the fact that the Project does nat emit any pollutants that elicit a primary mutagenic mode of action, the use of the OEHHA guidelines to determine potential construction health risks would not be appropriate and, therefore, is not recommended by Urban Crossroads at this tune. Additionally, the Project is not a generator of substantive diesel heavy duty trucks du ring project operations and would not be a source of substantive TACs, The DEIR correctly evaluates potential impacts, and no further evaluation Is required. RESPONSE TO GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS COMMENTS RESPONSEt—FAWLIRE TO IMPLEMENT ALL FEASIBLE,MITIGATION MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS - The cornmenter asserts that the Project should implement additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project's GHG emissions to less than significant. However, the list of potential measures suggested by the commenter is simply the full list of potential GHG-reducing measures identified in the 5CAG RTP15C5 2020-2045 plan from which lead agencies are encouraged to select the measures they deem to be applicable and feasible for a particular project. That is exactly what occurred with this project as the measures Identified in the SCAG plan to reduce a GHG emissions applicable to the project, or their equivalent, were incorporated into the project as enforceable PDFS {see Draft JEIR at pp. 4.7-10 - 4.7-3, and Development Agreement Exhibit Q. These PDFs reduce the projeces GHG emissions to the maximum extent feasible, and the comment does not identify any specific or additional feasible measures that would sulastantiaIlly reduce the projects remaining GHG emissions. Instead, the EIR Identifies mitigation measure IVIM GHG-1, which requires the Project to implement mitigation via the purchase of carbon credits (nr suhim issior of a GHG Reduction Plan). Although the purchase of carbon credits will not further reduce the direct generation of GIG emissions by the project, it does offset those emissions by reducing other GHG emissions elsewhere, and this ° Unlied States env]ronnnental ProCectlon Agency, National Center for knvironmental AssebsmM, �018, 1ntOgrated Risk Information System IIR SI. Diesel EngiA@ Exhaust. 7 264 7-17 RTC SWAPO 417 IY �T _ JK1 nj cJ 1.). Vau hn. I sq t �pl1,Zeilt�nga, Pu0i,'Y'01I.gfi �- Try;gg?i- 1.1.P P, S l5 approach to mitigating GHG emissions has been used in some jurisdictions to effectively mitigate a projects GHG emissions to a less than significant level. In an abundance of caution, although MM GHG-1 mitigates the ProjerCsGHG emissions to less than significant levels, the Draft Ell concluded that because the use of carbon credits has not been widely used for residential and resort development projects in the Coachella Valley, the projeci:s GHG emissions should considered significant and unavoidable (see Draft EIR, at p.4.7-26). The DEIR correctly evaluates and discloses potential impacts and all feasible PDFs and mitigation measures to mitigate those impacts to the maximum extent feasible. No further evaluation or mitigation is required. Respectfully submitted, 11R8AN CROSSROADS, INC. Haseeb Qureshi Principal URBAN 72641-1J RTC SWAPS Hu Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:23 AM To: Tim Albinson; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Albinson, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Tim Albinson Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 6:01 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I am in full support of the Coral Mountain Wave Project. The project will bring jobs and investment to the valley as well as continue to position the community as a leader in terms of tourism, recreation and healthy lifestyle. It is thoughtfully planned and will be a marvelous addition to the valley landscape! All the best Tim Albinson 419 Tania Flores From: Cheri Flores Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 8:21 AM To: Tania Flores Cc: Consulting Planner; Danny Castro Subject: FW: FYI- It's Not A Matter Of If But When ... Water "SHAMING" & GUILT will be the ByProduct Of La Quinta's & Coachella Valleys TONE-DEAF Approval Of Surf Parks & Lagoons For The Mega Rich During The Mega Drought See correspondence below. Chellrlil Ploires I Planning Manager Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760)777-7067 .Il::::Ellaca .c�.Quliir toCA,, ov rrnm r.:...11::::..Q a ii Imta CA„ From: Sent: Saturdav, Mav 14, 2022 7:32 AM Steve Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Cheri Flores v <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; Subject: FYI- It's Not A Matter Of If But When... Water "SHAMING" & GUILT will be the ByProduct Of La Quinta's & Coachella Valleys TONE-DEAF Approval Of Surf Parks & Lagoons For The Mega Rich During The Mega Drought 1 T'VI R.NAIL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Approving SURF -PARKS in La Quinta & The Coachella Valley During This Unprecedented Catastrophic Mega -drought for the Mega -Rich Is Not Only TONE-DEAF but will come back to bring shame and derision on the City of LaQuinta & Entire Coachella Valley for approving these OBSCENE & FRIVOLOUS wastes of our precious and vanishing water. Everyday it becomes more inevitable. Lush SoCal Landscapes, Lawns & Turf Are Going Away Quickly......... 420 SoCal's environment and visual look is completely changing, almost overnight. Water "SHAMING" will become a very big cultural thing. This will apply to high -end golf course / country clubs / lushly landscaped homes, lagoons and Surf -Parks. The Class / Elite Privilege & Entitlment Will BE Too Glaring To Ignore. This "Shaming" will be aimed directly at LaQuinta and the Coachella Valley. How can any City or Development In The SoCal Desert Approve These Profligate Wastes And Expect The Public & Press To Ignore This Environmental & Societal Abuse Of This Rapidly Vanishing Resource? It is no longer business as usual for the Coachella Valley. To act otherwise is just TONE-DEAF WHISTLING IN THE GRAVEYARD. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/03/climate/las-vegas-lawn-grass-ban.htm I OutlawedWhere Lawns Are I Carted With drought and growth taking a toll on the Colorado River, the source of go percent of the region's water, a new law in Las Vegas mandates the removal of turf, patch by patch. No Lawns / Non -Functional Turf Are Next For SoCAL.... https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/new-la-water-restrictions-conservation-drought-mayor-garcetti- ladwp/2889703/ What are the new outdoor water restrictions in Los Angeles? Outdoor watering will be limited for LADWP customers to two days per week, starting June 1. That's a change from the current limit of three days per week. Homeowners will be assigned two watering days per week based on even- and odd -number addresses. Watering will be permitted at odd -numbered street addresses on Mondays and Fridays, and at even - numbered addresses on Thursdays and Sundays. 2 421 The city also strongly recommends using pool covers to decrease evaporation of pool water and washing vehicles at commercial car wash businesses. That's in addition to existing watering restrictions, which include limiting watering with sprinklers to eight minutes per station and using water conserving nozzles limited to 15 minutes per station. All watering will have to be done in the evening or early morning, with no watering permitted outdoors between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. People who don't follow the rules will receive a warning, followed by increasing fines for subsequent violations. Truly, A Very Rapid Repudiation of the California Dream Is Becoming A Reality............ 3 422 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:01 AM To: Fritz Bachli; Planning WebMail Subject: Re: FEIR Wave Park / Item: Noise / Reference Art. 2.2.4 Mr. Bachli, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council as they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Fritz Bachli Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:34 PM To: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov> Subject: FEIR Wave Park / Item: Noise / Reference Art. 2.2.4 E TERNAI.: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hi Nicole, Ladies and Gentlemen from the Planning Commission! Your education regarding amplified noise transfer was certainly helpful for people with little to no experience in this field. Thank you. I spent many years in the Swiss Airforce as a second cockpit officer dealing with Radar Navigation Instruments and Wireless Communication equipment. On my days off, living near a public pool and hearing the megaphone announcements of the lifeguards who were sitting on an elevated observation deck overlooking a noisy pool, was annoying and a nuisance. (picture attached) Fortunately, the pool was open in Summer only from 10 AM and closed at 5 PM allowing some quiet time for residents in the surrounding living areas of the pool. Compared with a public pool, the wave basin is 2000 ft long and 500 ft wide with 6 ft crashing waves. Can you explain how many loudspeakers, at which locations and at what height above the wave basin these loudspeakers will be installed allowing the surfers, emergency personnel, etc. to hear messages during operating hours 365 days a year from 7 AM to 10 PM. For your information,Trilogy does not allow amplified music from outside homes at all times day or night. The noise level in the morning hours and at night is 3 - 4 dBA measured with a handheld Sound Level Meter MK 09 by METERK. We can hear music, people conversing from the outdoor patio of the Bistro (which is relatively close to the wave Park), the Race Track in Thermal, and of course the Coachella Festivals in Indio. Thank you for your response. FEB 423 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 1:40 PM To: Fritz Bachli; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Robert Radi; Steve Sanchez; Linda Evans Cc: Tania Flores; brian.mooney.tlgma@gmail.com; Martha.Fogg@fsresidential.com Subject: Re: Wave Surf Park, La Quinta Mr. Bachli, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council as they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Fritz Bachl Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 12:15 PM To: Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Tania Flores <tfIores(@laauintaca.eov>: Subject: Wave Surf Park, La Quinta EXTERNAU This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Ladies and Gentleman, I attended all of the meetings at City Hall and enjoyed the professional approach the subject matter was dealt with. Please find attached my takeaway and after reading and talking to Trilogy residents it seems to me that the project, as we got to know it in its planning stage, does not deserve its exclusive spot and limited use and enjoyment for neighbors and residents near and far along the majestic Coral Mountains. My appreciation for your work and, acting as the city hall host, is much appreciated. Thank you. Fritz E. Bachli 424 Groundwater "Banking" and not Drinking Water "Wasting" Message to City Council & Presentation to Planning Commission on 4/26/2022 in the City Hall of La Quinta / CA .gy: Fritz E. Bachli, / Trilogy Resident since 2008. (Key elements summarized in 3 Minute speech to audience!) Ladies and Gentlemen, I studied the EIR and FEIR in great details. It was an eye opener reading the many letters submitted by residents and a learning experience to gain insights from expert statements on the subject matter. Overwhelmingly, people attending the meeting were against the construction of the Wave Park at the planned site for a variety of well thought out reasons! As a first reaction, many residents found the operating schedule for the Wave Park: 365 days per year, from 7 AM to 10 PM inhumane and reflecting typical opening hours expected in commercial zoning districts but not in residential areas. The Wave Basin, for water replenishment purposes calls for 119.58 AFY (Acre Ft. per Year) of water Or 38.96 MGY (Millions of Gallons per Year) of Water (refer to MAWA calculation in the FEIR for Wave Basin only). Assuming, a cow's water consumption amounts to 20 Gallons of water per day, 1'948'000 cattle as well as other livestock, could be kept alive and not having to be slaughtered due to lack of drinking water! (USA counts 93.8 million cattle) Each American uses an average of 82 gallon of water a day at home or 29'930 gallons per year. (USGS estimated use of water in 2015 / Internet Source) At this rate 1300 people could be provided with fresh water instead of being misspent in a private Water Basin used by a few surfers only. Today, the fight is all about oil - tomorrow it will be the water! To run the Wave Basin 107'000 Gallons of water or 5 Tanker Rail Cars, with a capacity of 20'000 Gallons of Water, will be spilled daily into the desert ground or evaporate in the hot and dry desert climate. With 2000 ft. length and a width of 500 ft. the basin size can be compared with the distance of the Trilogy Parkway between the Clubhouse and the Intersection of Rt. 60. The width of 500 ft., the basin is almost twice the width of the Trilogy Parkway. In my opinion the City of La Quinta should play a leading role in improving water conservation in the Coachella Valley and support and fill the gaps in state, county and federal environmental regulations furthering water conservation. If local government does not do so with local actions, those gaps may not be addressed, and conservation methods will not be implemented. In some of the Landscape Packages and Irrigation Checklists of other communities, heavy fines for stealing water are waiting for the offenders violating state, county and /or city laws. Water like air, we all are all entitled to. God's natural gifts need to be shared! I therefore ask the La Quinta City Government to pursue a Policy of Groundwater "Banking" and not Drinking Water "Wasting!" We must be prepared that in times of a more serious drought we can use our water 425 especially when imported water supplies are unavailable and /or very expensive. Yes, we currently have a great aquifer running under the valley floor but if we keep it draining for ridiculous purposes, as in the case of the Wave Park, we infringe on established laws and foremost, as a people, show no common sense and no support for our government in environmental matters. What if the Surf Park is deprived of getting enough water from the purveyor due to tightening of water use restrictions? For an entire Valley to save water to keep a private Wave Park alive, I don't think so! Three years of observing the Reconstruction and new Construction of Landscapes, from an administrative and construction point of view, I have witnessed that landscape architects, landscapers as well as property owners frequently are bypassing the required application process by not submitting a "Landscape Documentation Package" the prerequisite required to obtain a "Water Use Permit". The result, the Lead Agencies and Purveyors have no records on files documenting of how many MAWA (Maximum water Allowance) abusers pull out water from the aquifer and in what quantities. Critical documents mandated to be signed and dated by the responsible persons confirming their compliance with the "Landscape and Irrigation" requirements are not signing the approval documents. The system controlling and measuring the water use seems out of control and not recognizing and penalizing offenders who are not abiding by the local rules, laws and Ordinances. In this context, please note that the Landscape Ordinance for the Wave Park in all the "Environmental Documents" is referring to Ordinance 1302.4. In search of this specific document in the EIR, CVWD confirmed that the correct document for the Surf Project is the CVWD Ordinance: 1302.5 and not 1302.4! For those of interest, the EIR states that the City Hall of La Quinta provides a full range of services including Code Compliance cases, etc. Using the required application forms, the Office for Code Compliance, in one of my cases however, refused to deal in matters of landscape issues. Pulling water without a permit is a non-compliance in my book! What is the status of the Landscape Package for the Wave Park? Has the city, as the Lead Agency, filed evidence material? Spending 6 years with a group of Trilogy residents which finally achieved the closing of the Fertilizer plant for heavy air and water contamination, I find the Wave Basin Project is an operation with far too many moving parts. The list of mitigations is already long and outsourcing services to monitoring agencies makes the process significantly more involved. It is my experience that every mitigation is giving birth to another one! It's a never-ending battle of the parties and the involvement of lawyers. Once the project has finally outlived its purpose, it will be experiencing a slow death. Dramatic pictures shown by residents confirm that many Wave Parks in the USA have had to close their doors. Trilogy citizens remember that after 6 2 426 years of fighting to enjoy a quality of life and enjoyment of living in our homes the Fertilizer plant had to be closed as well. Peace and clean air returned to the Trilogy community. Like the resident who wrote:" I have strong objections to the multiple statements that appear throughout the DEIR regarding identified statements such as: "are not anticipated", "would not be significant", "impact would not substantially change the situation", "minimal impact the result", etc. These are not scientific and neutral comments. They do not inspire confidence in the findings. It sounds like a high -risk operation with anticipated problems where the applicants are attempting to cover up knowing problems well ahead of construction. CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) points out that in enforcing their rules the Attorney General focuses on the need to address those impacts that affect our most vulnerable residents — children, the elderly and people who already are bearing an unfair share of pollution and those impacts that will particularly be felt by our children and grandchildren. Do our city leaders really want to tie their political legacy to the desecration of one of the last truly unique tracts of La Quinta by money haunted developers who want to change the land into a circus like attraction operating 365 days from 7 AM to 10 PM? (Resident comment) This project is built on a weak foundation and the mitigations signal lack of trust in the proposed project. I believe that persons with common sense can and should stop right now by simply holding fast to the original zoning. (Resident comment) Moving Traffic and Noise away from Residential areas to Residential / Commercial reserved locations is the right planning. It strikes a balance among the many competing demands on land creating development patterns that are orderly and rational, provide the greatest benefits for individuals and the community as a whole and avoid nuisance conflicts between land uses. The Coachella Valley reminds me of the city in the Rhone Valley in Sion / Switzerland where I lived and worked for many years. A fun wave park was built (refer to Internet: alaiabay.ch/de) which could be enjoyed by everybody and was accessible in minutes from the nearby Highway, Train Station, Buses and attracted tourists from all over the world. Within 10 Minutes from the City Center with hotels, bars, and other entertainment the fun after surfing could be continued late into the night without disturbing anybody. I recommend that you visit and experience the vacation spot for yourself! You will be welcomed and surprised to experience how thoughtful zoning can bring sense and order into a community. Finally, please, don't bring the city life into our residential communities but direct and encourage applicants to succeed with their businesses in our commercial districts where they are welcome by the residents of La Quinta. Thank you! Alaiabay.ch/de 3 427 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 1:18 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: Fw: Wave Basin Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 11:51 AM To: Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner<ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: Wave Basin Not sure if you got this one Nicole. Since the sender gives me a questionable "promotion" I'm pretty sure you didn't. K Kathleen Fitzpatrick I Council Member City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 E: kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov www.laquintaca.gov www.playinlaquinta.com Begin forwarded message: From: Richard Baker Date: May 4, 2022 at 9:55:07 AM PDT To: Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Wave Basin ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear Mayor Fitzpatrick. I have lived at for 20 years and enjoy the quiet serenity of the neighborhood. Even with all the construction going on on Ave. 58, the crews leave by 4pm and the late afternoons and evenings are delightfully quiet. I don't know what 75 decibels sounds like from a distance, but I hope I can't hear or feel it from 7am-10pm 365 days a year. Also, it's annoying enough to hear and feel the music from Coachella 2 weekends a year and to deal with the crazy traffic, so the prospect of 4 unspecified events per year across the street with 2500 people sounds like an additional i 428 mess. And there is some natural beauty to the Coral Mountain area that won't be helped by 17 80' tall light poles. The rest of their proposed development sounds good, but I am against the wave basin. Richard Baker Sent from my iPad 429 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:27 AM To: Tony Bouza; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro; City Clerk Mail Cc: Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Bouza, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Tony Bouza Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 6:27 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support EXTEMYAIJ This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Honorable Members of the La Quinta City Council: As local residents, we are writing to voice our support for the Coral Mountain project. After monitoring project discussions and presentations at the recent Planning Commission hearings and reviewing the voluminous environmental documents, we are pleased to support this project because we believe it will benefit our community. The opponents have voiced complaints about its impact on water use, lighting and traffic. However, the city's own studies, the environmental review and the developer's information persuade us that those objections are overstated and unreasonable, especially compared to other likely uses for the site. For example, the project is already approved for a golf course, which would consume much more water than the proposed wave basin. The lighting and traffic issues have also been fully and satisfactorily addressed by the developer and are not materially different than the impacts of a different project. The advantages of Coral Mountain are numerous, including the tax revenue it will generate for La Quinta and site improvements that will benefit the surrounding areas. Plus, it will be a unique attraction for the area. Please do not veto this project! People fear change, but change is necessary and inevitable. The change that will result from the Coral Mountain project will be much better, and will result in more benefits, than the change that is likely to result from another golf course or some other project on the site. We respectfully urge you to approve Coral Mountain. 430 Tony & Cynthia Bouza La Quinta, CA 92253 431 Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:37 PM To: Consulting Planner; Tania Flores Cc: Cheri Flores; Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva Subject: Brooks, Jeff 2022-006-01 - I Support Coral Mountain! Comments for the project file. Thank you. Monika Radeva, CMC I City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Jeff Brooks Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:00 PM To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov> Subject: I Support Coral Mountain! ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** To whom it may concern, My wife Michelle, daughter Erin, and I strongly support the Coral Mountain project. We are currently Hawaii residents but we are planning to relocate permanently to La Quinta if this project is approved. We were able to personally visit the proposed Coral Mountain site and view the development plans and we are so excited about the opportunity to live in such an amazing community. We hope this project is approved and that it provides homes and recreational opportunities to many families like ours. Thank you! Sincerely, Jeff Brooks i 432 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:16 PM To: Preston BUTCHER; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Butcher, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Preston BUTCHER Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 11:13 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** As an extended visitor to Indian Wells and La Quinta I'm very familiar with the Coral Mountain project I have reviewed the lighting, traffic and water issues and feel they have been adequately addressed. We spend 6 months a year in the area. I have played golf many times at the near by Quarry Club. I know the area well and am delighted to support the project. Thankyou Preston i 433 Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 1:03 PM To: Consulting Planner Cc: Cheri Flores; Tania Flores; Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva Subject: FW: Callimanis presentation May 17 City Council meeting public comment on items not on agenda Attachments: Callimanis May 17 City Council presentation. pdf FYI for the Coral Mountain Resort project file Monika Radeva, CMC I City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Alena Callimanis Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 11:48 AM To: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Callimanis presentation May 17 City Council meeting public comment on items not on agenda ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Good day Monika. Here is my presentation for today's City Council meeting, public comments, items not on the agenda. Thank you very much. Alena Callimanis La Quinta, CA 92253 i 434 N N O N N E .=3 Cf J Ln M IT U C) cn O 4� O 4 c- O O �' �, O . - U � C Ln 4 E u E 4- O O U a--' U-) L E C� 0 C f� �_ C— � �U 4.�U U >� U m O O �Ul o O Ul U E >, E E E E O O O O U a--� +� U =3 s U a--+ Q cn . Ln = /'R \i 1 +J +"J — Ca L U cn • InE N Q 0 N E E� O cn • — cn O U bn O ca tw.�U m}'w m ca • Ln i t�0 O O 4-1 _ ao4-J O Ln •- u � � a1 � � O > a� u -0 N > — > �' ca +-� — hA • — U O ::3 aA (1) �C +J V) ca c/) (-a -0 s O +- — to ~ �0 CD}' 1 ca }' n ^ 1 S w + j ZL cn ca cn . _ s cn • (n O 3: Ca +-+ U cn ca >' N • ra O L _0 O U-) U a) a)U cn a-+ D� a- i i+-+ zvi ss 0LU o Q= U a+ N U Q Q .s O 16 -0 Ca a-J M Zr) .� O � p s O `l •0 .N � s Ln U ul a E O U O E Z O L- �° Q) a U ao uQ �o E p a� s CL C c rn M V / � O E Q) E O iQj 0 =3 � c6 Ln � a N Q 'i V Q Q� O O- CL V C: Q cu N O V O O cu � 4J _0 4� ) 7 v L' 2 E N s� �E �,E o C ° a V O V O c" Q Q� cn ._ E 2 Ln O U .o E +� a) o O �� Ln Q �v t 0 O O0 .Q O Ln V � O It IT 4--j .- U •- 2 (13 s E N .— O •V) ca V) O V E .N E E o E VT-P O f� V O +J V O .� �_ O �53 U (� O Q �t U =3 >-E Ln J E V U O o to w 4-J a�Ln +-j O ca ca s s V •— i 0 .� O CA •— �� � N cu N p O Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 11:09 AM To: John Caskey; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Caskey, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: John Caskey Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:55 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support EXTEMYAIL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear members of city of La Quinta City Council and staff, Don Wilson Builders has been an owner of residences in the desert area for over 50 years. The company was founded by Don and Elinor Wilson in 1955 and the properties were used primarily as their own escapes for long weekends. Over the last twenty five years, the main property , Palm Desert) has been used by the company employees as they sign up months in advance for their weekend away with their families and friends (and take the company gas card with them). I am one of the investors in Coral Mountain and I think it would be a great addition to the area. The development would provide new and interesting experiences for members of the community as well as to visitors making their way to the desert just for the weekend. I can tell you that our employees, many with young families, are excited about this project. Also, as a real estate developer, I know that this project will be planned and designed with the highest professionalism based on the information I have received as well as participating in various meetings with the principals of the project. I have surfed at the same wave pool in Lemoore that this wave pool is designed after and it will be incredible. I know many of the other investors and they are concerned more about the quality and beauty of the project than simply just having a wave to ride (they can do this anywhere in the world). For many, including myself, it is more about coming back years later and seeing a project that we can all be proud of. 442 I strongly support this project and hope you will too. Thanks for your time and consideration. John Don Wilson Builders Torrance, CA 90505 Office 310-539-9902 Fax 310-539-2876 Cell 714-308-2700 0ohnc@donwilsonbuilders.com Irvine Office ........................................................... 2020 Main Street, Suite 11 443 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:02 AM To: Tania Flores Subject: Fw: Wave Park Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Eve Castles Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:16 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Subject: Wave Park EXTERNALThis message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear La Quinta City Council Members - I'm writing in opposition to the proposed Wave Park. My husband and I moved to La Quinta in February, drawn by the quiet, low key vibe of South La Quinta. We were attracted to the quality of the people, the aesthetics, and amenities. Early risers, we were lulled into appreciation of the quiet, star -filled nights. We didn't purchase a home in Palm Springs, Palm Desert or any of the other cities with more 'action' for a reason. Imagine our surprise when we discovered a Wave Park and resort might be moving in just over a mile away from us. And the amusement park would stay open until 10 pm every night? HELPM Do any of you live within 2 miles of the proposed wave park? If the answer is no, please think how you would feel if the development were proposed in your neighborhood .... We opposed the wave park development for several reasons: 1) Light and noise pollution (Let's talk noise mitigation for a minute: noise will bounce off of Coral Mountain and go right over any retaining walls. There was no mention of berms to absorb any sound). 2) Too many short term vacation rentals 3) Increased traffic down Madison and Monroe 4) Water use inappropriate for our area. PLEASE take a step back for a moment. Does a wave park really belong in the desert? The answer is no. ... PLEASE preserve our sense of quiet and peace in South La Quinta (said while listening to the StageCoach concert 1.5 miles down the road in the other direction). WATER is for drinking, bathing and use inside the house. We need to shift our paradigm view of water and water use! Start with this project and vote NO! Thank you for listening. Eve Castles SIDE NOTE: As a landscape designer, I see lots of areas for improvements of water use in the Coachella Valley. Water is a scarce resource for California and is becoming even more so. Growing up in the SF Bay Area, I lived close to cities like Palo Alto, Los Altos, Redwood City - all named for their stately redwoods. Our annual rainfall was typically between 18-22 inches of rain. Since 2010, the average rainfall in the San Jose area has been 8.6 inches per year. Eight of every 10 redwoods is declining or dead at the lower elevations. The temperatures are too hot and there is not enough water for them to survive. It is painful to watch the number of other trees, also in decline. CasUles I.....andscape f...')e,siign & Outdoor II....Miing Find me on Houzz 445 Tania Flores From: Jon McMillen Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 2:27 PM To: John Pena Cc: Danny Castro; Consulting Planner; Tania Flores; Teresa Thompson Subject: FW: Important Regarding the Site Development Permit for the Wave Basin Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged John, I believe this email from Lisa was intended for you. Regards Jon McMillen III City Manager City of La Quinta '78..4:.."�....._ ..................... air.l�..ii..��....._.........II::::::........Q.u:1..ii..nta.................. CA ,. ,°,... . Ph. 760.777.7030 pirnoirtt�iilllleinlla¢�uiintaca�,gov ov From: Lisa Castr Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 2:56 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>, Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>, Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>, dcastro@laquinta.gov <dcastro@laquinta.gov>, rradi@laquinta.gov <rradi@laquinta.gov>, ssanchez@laquinta.gov <ssanchez@laquinta.gov> Subject: Important Regarding the Site Development Permit for the Wave Basin E TliwRNAU This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. John, as you are aware, the Planning Commission did not approve the Site Development Permit for the Wave Basin. Chairman Nieto felt there was not enough detail on the north side of the wave basin to be able to evaluate the safety measures for children since the hotel, casitas and boardwalk are on that side of the wave basin. MM However, I think of even bigger concern is the east end of the wave basin. That is going to be 400 feet wide, curved, and is where the beginner and novice surfers will get lessons or people will surf the gentler waves. As you remember from the lighting demonstration when you were at my house, there is very little room between my property and the eighty foot light they were using for the demonstration. The reason for my safety concern is that along the side of my property is the only vehicular passageway, including all hotel and landscape maintenance vehicles, repair trucks, delivery vehicles, etc., that need to go between 60th and the north side of the pool. Vehicular traffic is not allowed on the west side of the Wave Pool on the Coral Mountain side because of the open space/recreation. For your information, there will also be beginner and novice surfers at the west end of the Wave Pool. I would like you to ask Staff to immediately request the developer to lay out the full 400 foot outline for the east edge of the wave basin, including the location of the lights. This is a requirement to determine how much room is available between the edge of the pool and the vehicular traffic, with lanes wide enough for trucks, and a minimum of one lane in each direction. There must be space available not only to enable surfers, which may be mostly children, to safely entry and leave the wave basin, but to also allow parents or guardians to safely stay out of the wave basin and still be able to monitor their children, which is a Public Health Safety Requirement for younger children. There will also be a requirement to safely leave the pool and walk from the East end of the wave basin back to the north end. In addition, the pulley system that pulls the hydrofoil also extends out beyond the wave basin on the east side. It is vitally important that all of this is factored into the Planning Commission safety review of the SDP. Obviously none of this was required in Lemoore so they have no experience already in this area. Thank you for your immediate attention to this. The Planning Commission cannot effectively review the SDP without this level of information. I would also appreciate it if you could forward this note to the Planning Commission members. Sincerely, Lisa Castro La Quinta, CA 92253 447 Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 12:58 PM To: Consulting Planner Cc: Tania Flores; Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva Subject: FW: Carolyn Winnor to read over Zoom this letter at May 17 2022 public comments items not on agenda and chart Attachments: Lisa Castro presentation by Carolyn Winnor City Council May 17.pdf; Lisa Castro May 17 items not on agenda.pdf FYI - see below and attached for the Coral Mountain project file. Thank you. IMloinlilka IRadeva, �'''A'"I (' i ����;�,�� u,..k Ot'11,,� of IIl a (, �..W i n� a ui p ,'� III III nipIco, a Qukinta, W dui ui MRadevaMaquintaca.gov From: Alena Callimani Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 12:49 PM To: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerl<Mail@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Subject: Carolyn Winnor to read over Zoom this letter at May 17 2022 public comments items not on agenda and chart t:X TRNAU This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hi, Monika. Lisa Castro is not available today. Lisa wanted her letter read that she sent to John Pena and the City Council on May 3. She has not received a response regarding her request in the letter. The chart attached will be on the screen and Carolyn Winnor will read the letter over Zoom. Thank you very much. Alena Callimanis La Quinta, CA 92253 i 448 � � N 4) N r O N � m o � 0 Q) oU ate-+ � N � � O O U cn +-) V U � ca 0 0 M .=3 Cf J I ma i II � " %/ � % �, �o�ouuuuuumUfib6 wi �o�iwo� r � / L O E O (U 4, L co J t a) a- L O O ate-+ c/) L ' ` - O O LA U L � O L 4� vim) O m +' O O U r) }' N N 00 J > VLn f6 O ,} L O N N L a..i N a--+ L L O f6 LU Q a-J (0 a 0 a + f6 bA C N (6 O Q U O co O > L N fB O O C N C� C N N 0) C: . Ou O Y U OJ 4- a) N U M ai � +L+ N N C6 a- NCJ N i a..i —_ U U N L v � O � L aN-+ N _ N — N �O >- c6 Q H N Q L4-- L � • • cv • v�i O LO IT May 3, 2022 To: John Pena <ipena@laquintaca.gov> cc: Linda Evans <levans@laquintaca.gov>, fitzpatrick Kathleen <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>, rradi@laquintaca.gov,ssanchez@laquintaca.gov, Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>,Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov> Regarding: Important Regarding the Site Development Permit for the Wave Basin John, as you are aware, the Planning Commission did not approve the Site Development Permit the Wave Basin. Chairman Nieto felt there was not enough detail on the north side of the wave k to be able to evaluate the safety measures for children since the hotel, casitas and boardwalk an that side of the wave basin. However, I think of even bigger concern is the east end of the wave basin. That is going to be 4( feet wide, curved, and is where the beginner and novice surfers will get lessons or people will su gentler waves. As you remember from the lighting demonstration when you were at my house, there is very little room between my house and the eighty foot light they were using for the demonstration. The rez for my safety concern is that along the side of my property is the only vehicular passageway, including all hotel and landscape maintenance vehicles, repair trucks, delivery vehicles, etc., thal need to go between 60th and the north side of the pool. Vehicular traffic is not allowed on the wE side of the Wave Pool on the Coral Mountain side because of the open space/recreation. For yo information, there will also be beginner and novice surfers at the west end of the Wave Pool. would like you to ask Staff to immediately request the developer to lay out the full 400 foot outlir the east edge of the wave basin, including the location of the lights. This is a requirement to determine how much room is available between the edge of the pool and the vehicular traffic, wit lanes wide enough for trucks, and a minimum of one lane in each direction. There must be spac available not only to enable surfers, which may be mostly children, to safely entry and leave the basin, but to also allow parents or guardians to safely stay out of the wave basin and still be able monitor their children, which is a Public Health Safety Requirement for younger children. There also be a requirement to safely leave the pool and walk from the East end of the wave basin bac the north end. In addition, the pulley system that pulls the hydrofoil also extends out beyond the wave basin on the east side. It is vitally important that all of this is factored into the Planning Commission safety review of the SDP. Obviously none of this was required in Lemoore so they I no experience already in this area. Thank you for your immediate attention to this. The Planning Commission cannot effectively rev! the SDP without this level of information. would also appreciate it if you could forward this note to the Planning Commission members. Sincerely, Lisa Castro Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 06:32:20 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Dion, Raylene & Garry: La Quinta Proposed Wave Park Date: Monday, May 30, 2022 at 10:02:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Monika Radeva To: raylene dion CC: City Clerk Mail, Consulting Planner, Cheri Flores, Tania Flores Good afternoon, the City has received the written comments provided below regarding the Coral Mountain Resort project, and will be included in the public record for this project. Thank you. I o in li Ik III v ,, ���� �,��� � I (�- a t'iy �i'�E i iiii�'�'�':�!�: ii k 111'-ft,1111 of III....a QUA a puiµ111t f I aIIIIII�: II n�iIIp a� ci, III I: uain . M_Ra d e..v....a..@ I a.q.u_i. n to ca.....g.o...v... From: raylene dion Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 9:41 PM To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov> Subject: La Quinta Proposed Wave Park EXTERNAL. This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear City Council, We have a home in La Quinta and enjoy every minute we spend there, enjoying the beautiful mountains, wildlife and sun. We can certainly understand how people would love to have a wave park there as it would be a like an oasis in the desert. But in the 10 years that we have lived in the desert, the primary concern we hear is about the water shortage. The last few years have been especially critical and we have changed our landscaping to desert scape to conserve water. We have fixed any leaks in our home or landscaping to prevent water loss. The Salton Sea is drying up and creating horrible toxic air to the poor residents that live in the area. Our water rates have gone up and we keep hearing that the Colorado river is drying up. How can city Council even consider a wave park when water is such a precious commodity? We would like the city of Laquinta to focus on cleaning up our city And updating areas that have fallen to disrepair. The parking lot and strip malls along Highway 111 have become dirty and no one is picking up the trash. Let's focus on fixing what we have and making Laquinta beautiful again! Thank you, Raylene and Garry Dion 452Page 1 of 2 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:18 PM To: Garrett Dutton; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Dutton, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Garrett Dutton Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 12:54 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear Friends of La Quinta I'm writing on behalf of the Coral Mountain Project which is coming before your board for approval soon. I am a musician known as G.Love. I've visited your lovely city and the greater Coachella valley when, over the years I've performed at Coachella music festival. I look forward to seeing Coral Mountain approved and developed into a thriving community of wellness, surfing and environmentally conscious stewards of the land who will create jobs and have a positive impact on the people, the land, the arts, the athletics and the community of La Quinta. I plan to visit and surf Coral Mountain as often as possible and we would love to build a house there as well. Respectfully, Garrett Dutton Sent from my iPhone 453 Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 1:07 PM To: Consulting Planner Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Eakle, Avis & Teresa: Opinion Letter to Newsom re WAVE project OPPOSED - AVIS EAKLE Attachments: COMMENT Newsom Letter re WAVE - EAKLE.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged FYI — attached comments regarding the Coral Mountain Resort project. IMoinlilka IRadeva, U,P:` (:.Jt'l�lly' (Jerk �„.. II Ills a (" w.,u kn to 78419115 .., d a a ' uof 3 ,a � �:� u�� a II � u ���°�u III '�,� w li u,..u�a � � � � .� :n L.. i w u. 5 MRadeva(�Olaquintaca.gov From: Teresa Thompson <Tthompson@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 2:01 PM To: Teresa Thompson <Tthompson@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Subject: COMMENT: Opinion Letter to Newsom re WAVE project OPPOSED - AVIS EAKLE Madam Mayor and Councilmembers, Please see the attached letter to Governor Newsom from Avis Eakle stating opposition to the Coral Mountain project that you were copied. Regards, Teresa Thompson III Management Specialist City Manager's Office City of La Quinta 78495 C Ile Tampico - La Quinta,C92253 . 760.777.7030 y mm_III _ Ilmillmlrl_�_�_�. _� .._ �gy yywv.,Ji q III n_t am _ �yA.,oVd 1.9 a mpmlp_jjy III Irk III_. m w III In t x c ar"nr.n. As always you can find a full list of resources and information by visiting .............................. ..,.,,II!A.g. u............................................iirt .2 i 454 LEMAUMN Goverr orGavis Newson 10210 Street 490W Sa cra me nto, CA w95814 Dear Governor Newson, My wife, Tprosa and I arp residents of LaQuinta, Calitornia in the, Palm Sprfrigs area. The, following is a devOopment pending approval by the IQuinta CItV Council. This develDipment files in the face of what you aretrying to achieve iq lower water consumption,, less energy being expended and the reduction of gases tnnitributing to g 10 bal wa rm ing, Recently, the p] an n I ng com m Is sic n of that city voted toa How a d eve Ii r n o ffrom th Is, cc rn rn u n ity to develop a 17' acre wave poo 1 (18 rn ii fion gallon s of water) on 400 acres of the pristine Coral M a unt ain which iinclude s 150 lh ote I room s,, 600 s h ort te rm re nta Is an d othe r recre ation al facilitie, s, Th is in,c] u�de s, 'two 80 f oot towe rs of ligb tsth at will re main a n until IN m. The proposal is to aflow thed e ve Io pe r to to P th is vaillpy's ac; uafe r an d thp CQ lo rad o Rive r Can a L The add itio nal traff k w,H I ad dto t h e noise, air pollution and greengases that poison our. aIr. AddiflonaRy, this development will, require rezoning to, provide for this devetopmant. How in good consdence can, this threatcontinue? Needless to, say, the deve lopers outside this valley are waliting in antIcipation of gaInIng more lland to develop here afters u ining Orange and Los, Angeles Counties. Aren't we suppose to be using less water, less energy and workiing on reducing green, house gaw;s? The counter argument Is that this development wM bring In more, jobs, spread tourist money and belng In nnore taxes, "I"he fact of the matter Is that there are rnanyjabs that employers here cannot fill,, tourisn"i has ruiried Las Vpgas, Sain Frandsai and othercommunifies, And taxes? Don't we Aready have a surplus? 0 n b e, ha lif of t housa n d s herein I aQuirit a and t h is va Ile y, pease se shut tbI s dow n Vils, develbprrient will be voted on bV the city counci in raid - April. Z= Avis Ke� m pe r Ea k1c, LaQuinta, CA., 92,253 455 CC: Raul Ruiz,, Congressman 43-875 WM,hington Street: Palm Desert, Ck 92211 Dianne Feinstein, Servatar 331 Hain Senate O,ff ice BuMing U Oty Couincil LaQuiryta CA. LaQvintia., CA. 92M Linda Evans, Mayor Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Mayor Pro Tern John! Pena Ste've Sanchez Robert Radi John Pena Coachella Valley Water 51501 TylerStreet Coathe Ala, CA. 97236 Imperial,, CA- 9,2251 456 457 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:25 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: Fw: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:21 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Estess, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 1:58 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support E TEIU'YAL, This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. La Quinta City Council, Thank you for taking the time to consider the Coral Mountain development. I truly believe it is going to be a welcome addition to the Coachella Valley. As a long time surfer and golfer, I am always torn between driving away from the beach and visiting the desert to golf.... now everyone can enjoy both!!! Best regards, Dr. Abe Estess : Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 17:22:08 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: RE: Mr. Gamlin, additional questions please - Please provide a Copy of the IID Will Serve Document you mentioned that is now available Date: Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 4:17:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: John Gamlin To: Alena Callimanis CC: Tara Bravo, Monika Radeva, Consulting Planner, Jon McMillen, Linda Evans Hello Ms. Callimanis, • All of the electrical loads within the project, including the Wave Basin, are included in the reduced load analysis. The power analysis is therefore comprehensive and encompasses the project buildout. • The original Will -Serve letter was not cancelled. It expired. Due to the dynamic environment of supply and demand it is common practice for utility service companies to put a "shelf life" on their will -serve commitments. • You have misinterpreted what I said regarding "freeing up" power. To clarify: Substation improvements are planned that will add additional service capacity to the electrical grid. If Coral Mountain is able to reduce the amount of power it is using from the added capacity, it "frees up" those resources to be used by others. By using less power there is more power available to service others in the area. This is a public benefit. We are not seeking electrical service for any project but our own. I hope this clarifies it for you. • The improvement design by IID is based on providing peak loads to our project specifically and does not have a bearing on other users outside the community. The project will bear the cost of these improvements. • You are correct ... it should be 850 cars annually, not daily. I stand by the accuracy of what was stated on the record in the Planning Commission hearing. I don't understand your point about STVRs. It is pure speculation to forecast utilization and occupancy as rental is an option, but not a requirement. So are you saying that the project's sustainability efforts don't matter and we should simply adhere to the lower efficiencies of the Cal -Green requirements? We are voluntarily exceeding Title 24 standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions because it is "the right thing to do" and have no obligation to do so. We think that speaks for itself and is not debatable. • I won't debate the argument of whether the Will -Serve letter rises to the level of CEQA with you and will defer to the City in this regard. • As stated previously, confirmation that a valid Will -Serve letter exists is sufficient and we consider the topic closed. Thanks, JG John Gamlin 760-238-2443 mobile jgamlin@coralmountain.com Coral Mountain 459Page 1 of 5 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Alena Callimanis Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 3:50 PM To: John Gamlin Cc- Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner; Jon McMillen; Linda Evans Subject: Mr. Gamlin, additional questions please - Please provide a Copy of the IID Will Serve Document you mentioned that is now available Mr. Gamlin, thank you for your comments. I would need additional clarification before I passed on your document to others, per your request. I hope you understand the requirement for this. You talk about reducing peak load demands and your reference to the Cal -Green CA Building Code requirements. We applaud you for your work in this area of the building code. However, we are of course concerned about the Wave HydroFoil electrical requirements. As you are aware, the Kelly Slater technology, due to the fact it is pushing almost 150 million pounds of water to generate the waves, many times an hour, has been documented to have the highest electrical energy consumption of any wave pool technology that exists today. So our concerns are not with the Cal - Green building and street lighting electrical savings for Coral Mountain. In the original Will Serve document, dated May 26, 2020 that was cancelled, the connection to the substation was going to be dedicated to Coral Mountain Resort due to this enormous electrical requirement of the Wave Basin. So per your response below, the ability to free up capacity for new users would be a significant change within the new Will Serve letter and means that you no longer will have dedicated service to just Coral Mountain Surf Resort. Please confirm that is an accurate statement. I believe this is an important piece of information that the City needs to know and validate as they are going through their meetings regarding IID and future electrical requirements as well as their approval of the EIR. Since there is so much new development being proposed in the area around Coral Mountain, that would certainly be important for the City to see that your excess capacity can be shared outside of Coral Mountain Surf Resort, since you are implying that it is no longer in the new Will Serve document, where the old Will Serve document said that the service is dedicated only to Coral Mountain Surf Resort. The City would then know it can count on it for new users. As you know, IID considers early evening through 9pm in the summer as peak energy consumption times and recommends not using "major appliances" during those hours when energy cutbacks may be required. So that is another reason it is important to understand dedicated versus non -dedicated electrical connections for Coral Mountain as evening surfing may impact electric availability to not only the Wave Pool, but then to other outside users. In the Planning Commission audio recording, you are recorded as saying that you are saving the Greenhouse Gas equivalent of 850 cars per year. Are you stating in your note below that the figure you gave in the Planning Commission meeting was inaccurate? Again, even if you are now saying it is daily, the fact that you have a developers agreement that states you can have 100% STVRs, negates any savings due to the high number of people that will stay in each STVR with multiple cars at each STVR, versus a normal residence. Even at your 30% average STVR usage you use for calculations. You state that the IID Will -Serve letter in not part of the CEQA review. Unfortunately, you have reference to the old, expired Will Serve letter in both the DEIR and EIR in the Electrical Utilities section, which was an integral part of the review process. The new Will Serve letter pre -dates the publishing of the EIR. The new terms should have been included in the EIR. So you must provide the new Will Serve letter so we can see how it changes the EIR. This is the statement from the EIR dated February 2022. "In a letter dated May 26, 2020, IID concluded that electrical facilities can be extended to serve the project, under the conditions in the will serve letter: Since this is an important part of the EIR, and the wrong information is in the EIR, we need to see the terms and conditions of the new Will Serve letter before the City votes on the EIR. 46CPage 2 of 5 So I would respectfully ask you to forward that to the City and they can forward it to me, or you can forward it directly to both me and the City. Thank you for expediting my request. Respectfully, Alena Callimanis La Quinta, CA 92253 On May 19, 2022, at 2:07 PM, John Gamlin <jgamlin@coralmountain.com> wrote: Hello Ms. Callimanis, Thanks for your email. To be candid, we do not understand the relevance of your request to the current public process. The IID Will -Serve letter is not part of the CEQA review or City entitlement process, nor are its business and technical terms a public document. If you have contacted IID recently and inquired, I am sure they said as much ... they do not regard service applications as public information. We have affirmed on record in a public meeting ---and are happy to re -affirm in this email ---that Coral Mountain has a valid Will -Serve letter. Also, my understanding is that the IID provides the City with a list of projects within its jurisdiction that currently have active Will -Serve letters, so perhaps the City can confirm. That should be sufficient. I hope you understand that the current electrical capacity challenges (risk) being discussed between IID, Valley cities, and new development does not affect existing users, but impacts future customers. A broad consortium comprised of the Cities of La Quinta, Indio, and Coachella, industry groups, and the private sector are actively working with IID to determine solutions, as it is vital to continued economic development. Finally, as you are aware from our presentations at the Planning Commission, Coral Mountain is incorporating measures into its design that are anticipated to reduce peak electrical load demands by over 50%. This is only possible by voluntarily and significantly exceeding the already stringent Cal -Green (Title 24) CA Building Code requirements. As stated at Planning Commission, these measures achieve a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions that is the equivalent of removing 850 cars from the road every day. To our knowledge, this is the first project in the Valley to make such a profound commitment to sustainability. 461Page 3 of 5 Reduction in the project's peak load is relevant because it effectively frees up new capacity that can be deployed to other new users in the City. Coral Mountain is thus providing additional public benefit through the conscientious and responsible design of the community. We request that if this message is shared with others that it be reproduced in its entirety for the benefit of complete context. Thanks in advance. Kind regards, John Gamlin jgamlin@coralmountain.com Coral Mountain Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Alena Callimanis Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 4:13 PM To: John Gamlin;- Cc: Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner; Jon McMillen; Linda Evans Subject: Mr. Gamlin. Ms. Bravo - Please provide a Copy of the IID Will Serve Document you mentioned that is now available Good day Mr. Gamlin and Ms. Bravo. I don't know if you saw my note of May 5 which I am attaching below. I am sure you are aware of the controversy surrounding IID and lack of power right now. Mayor Evans gave a brief update that IID is out of power and new substation equipment has a very long lead time. Since in the Planning Commission meeting you stated that you do have a valid Will Serve letter, can you please forward the current, approved Will Serve letter to me? I did a public records request of the City, and Ms. Criste says the City does not have it. Thanks for providing it in a timely manner. Sincerely, Alena Callimanis On May 5, 2022, at 12:09 PM, Alena Callimanis wrote: 462Page 4 of 5 Good day Mr. Gamlin. In the Planning Commission meeting, you stated that there was a new approved IID Will Serve letter. I made a public records request of the City of La Quinta for a copy of it. Ms. Criste said she does not have a copy and that I should request it from you. Thank you very much for forwarding me the approved Will Serve IID letter. I need a copy prior to the City Council meeting on the Coral Mountain Project. Respectfully, Alena Callimanis La Quinta, CA 92253 463Page 5 of 5 Tania Flores From: Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 4:48 PM To: Planning WebMail Subject: NO TO REZONING for Coral Mountain Development Project EX TRNAU This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Ladies and Gentlemen, I am strongly opposed to the proposed development of nearly 400 acres of undeveloped land between 58th and 601n streets west of Madison in the city of La Quinta in order to build a massive commercial park containing a hotel, shops, restaurants, short-term rentals, and a wave pool. The residents of south La Quinta do not want or need the additional traffic, noise, bright lighting and wasting thousands of gallons a day of precious drinking water that will result if the city council approves this project. We are in the midst of a serious drought that may worsen with time and cannot afford to waste such a precious resource for the pleasure of a few. For these and other reasons I urge you to vote NO on this development project. Thank you, Nathan Gardner La Quinta, CA 92253 mm Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:27 AM To: Jeff Gordon; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Gordon, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Jeff Gordon Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 7:08 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** To Whom it May Concern, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing you to express my full support of the Coral Mountain Wave Project in La Quinta. As someone who has taken my family on many world class trips and recently visited the Surf Ranch, Kelly Slater's first wave pool in Lemoore, CA, I can tell you unequivocally it was one of the most professionally run and best family experiences we have had the pleasure to be a part of. I'm certain it would add tremendous value to the La Quinta community if this project were approved not to mention the endless visits from me and my family. Thank you for your consideration. Jeff Gordon Vice Chairman Hendrick Motorsports 465 Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 09:36:16 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: FW: COMMENTS: Surf Park - Opposed Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 8:41:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Cheri Flores To: City Clerk Mail CC: Teresa Thompson, Tania Flores, Consulting Planner, Danny Castro Attachments: image001.png Monika and Co, We will begin forwarding these over to you as it is going in front of the Council now. Let us know if you need help with anything. Thanks!! lh iii--ii IFlloiii--es I Planning Manager Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760)777-7067 CII....IFIloires(dIl....aQuiiiriLdCA..gov www„ II....a Qu Il in to CA.. g ov From: Teresa Thompson <Tthompson@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 4:48 PM To: Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: COMMENTS: Surf Park - Opposed From: Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 4:40 PM To: Council <Council@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Surf Park EXTERNAL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. 46(page 1 of 2 I am writing to urge you not to approve the Kelly Slater surf resort. Governor Newsome is imposing extreme restrictions on property owners regarding water usage. It is unconscionable to even consider such a project under current circumstances with an unknown future of droughts. Some people are under the mistaken belief that this will lure people to the area and give locals something to do. This park will serve an elite few. We have miles of coastline in California. That's where people go to surf. The only reason a project like this is even being considered has to be that La Quinta is going to obtain some short term financial gain. At what cost? Please do not pass this project. It will turn into a huge debacle and when it fails this council will be forever burdened with the fact that they approved it. Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS 46�Page 2 of 2 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 11:10 AM To: Marco Hanlon; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Hanlon, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Marco Hanlon Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:37 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support EXTIFMYAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello There, Wanted to reach out to you all to express our family's excitement and support for the upcoming discussion and consideration of the Coral Mountain project. We're life-long southern Californian's spending most of our time in Orange and San Diego counties. For decades, we've enjoyed spending vacation time in La Quinta and it's surrounding cities as well. We've always considered your community a great place to visit, and possibly one day, own a home and live. We've been following along over the past few years on the possibility of the Coral Mountain project coming to La Quinta and believe it would be a tremendous asset to the city and community in so many ways for both locals and visitors! Thank you for your consideration! Marco and Nicole Hanlon Encinitas, CA MW Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:20 AM To: Tania Flores Subject: Fw: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:19 AM To: Doug Harold Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Harold, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Doug Harold Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 9:49 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support E TEIU'YAL, This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. I am reaching out to advocate support for this project. I am a frequent visitor to La Quinta to play golf, see friends at the Hideaway and the Quarry, and I am an avid sports enthusiast... surfer, golfer, and racquet sports of all types. I reside in San Diego and hope to have a second home in the Coral Mountain community. I think it will be wonderful for the community, and will bring in fresh you active folks who will positively impact the Coachella valley and all residents and businesses. I hope you will please vote yes to support this amazing project. Thank you and regards, f�i7:l EM B. Douglas Harold I CEO I Mobile/Text: 760-805-2675 1 Email: doug@bdhcap.com Schedule a call with Doug ****************************************************************************************** This message may contain confidential or proprietary information intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above or may contain information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or copying this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and delete the original message and any copies immediately thereafter. If you received this email as a commercial message and would like to opt out of future commercial messages, please let us know and we will remove you from our distribution list. Thank you. ****************************************************************************************** FAFLD 470 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:17 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: Fw: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Very, very supportive Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:16 PM To: Gary Hewson ; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Very, very supportive Mr. Hewson, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Gary Hewson Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 11:43 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Very, very supportive ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Hello, I live between Santa Monica California and Scottsdale Arizona. I have been coming to La Quinta since I was a child where my family would play golf growing up. 471 I can't count the amount of times I've stayed at the La Quinta resort. I used to own a home on Fairway Drive in Indian wells. The desert has always been an amazing place and I think the addition of this wave pool project would take the desert to a new level. That entire area for me was always an escape and a destination to play golf or tennis: I think the addition of this wave pool(which I had the opportunity to surf up at the original one) Would open up the sports and activity destination to a wider group of people who will discover how truly special the La Quinta area is. I know that after May and until October the desert gets so hot that it really becomes less attractive but I think adding some thing like a wave pool could really extend your season and just be a net positive for everyone. This is a project that I know a lot of people like me are incredibly excited for and I hope it becomes a reality. www.hewsoninvest.com Gary Hewson CEO Hewson Investment Group 472 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:17 AM To: Randall Hunt; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Support for Coral Mountain Wave Project Mr. Hunt, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Randall Hunt Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 9:56 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Support for Coral Mountain Wave Project EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello! I am writing to express my support for the Coral Mountain Wave project. I am a Newport Beach resident that spends considerable time in the desert communities. My family — and many other families that I know — love coming to La Quinta and would love to see Coral Mountain help improve an undeveloped area of the community in a responsible manner that will generate significant lifestyle and economic advantages. Please let me know if there are other ways I can voice my support! Randall Hunt Newport Beach, CA 473 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 4:52 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: Fw: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Alan Johnson Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:57 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support I'::TI' RNALw This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear City Council, Without carrying on and on I will cut right to the point. Approval of the Coral Mountain Wave Project is imperative. Having spent the last 50 years of my life in Southern California I have seen many changes. One of the changes that is taking place and needs to happen in more areas is alternative healthy lifestyle options that are actually fun. Currently, the desert has many golf options and this involves not always buy typically a lot of drinking. Each club and community is a bit different but really it is the same exact experience. One of the reasons I am passionate about alternative options is my work in the addiction field for the last 18 years. We all need variety and exposure to new and exciting lifestyle choices. Golf is fantastic but why not compliment it with surfing, mountain biking, etc? In my opinion, this project will spearhead other developers to start thinking out of the box. The amount of global press is almost guaranteed which would be amazing to know that this project will be a national and international trend setter. Coral Mountain will be a tipping point. I sincerely hope that you see the same vision that is available for La Quinta. Please feel free to contact me at any time if you have further questions. 474 Sincerely, Alan Johnson i ort Beach, CA 92660 475 Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 10:21:47 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:49:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Danilo Kawasaki To: levans@laquintaca.gov, rradi@laquintaca.gov, kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov, jpena@laquintaca.gov, ssanchez@laquintaca.gov, jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov, ncriste@laquintaca.gov, dcastro@laquintaca.gov Attachments: image001.png, image002.png, image003.png, image004.png, image005.png To Whom It May Concern, When I first heard about the Coral Mountain project, I got very excited about the possibility of having surf and golf next to each other. I sold my second home in Palm Springs and bough a home in La Quinta, right across from Coral Mountain on Salida del Sal and also joined The Quarry. Needless to say, I am a big fan and supporter of the Coral Mountain project. I truly believe this will be an one - of -a -kind community that will attract health conscious people looking to partake in not only surfing and golfing, but also other outdoor activities and wellness in general. This project will be a tremendous addition to the city of La Quinta, bringing not only more revenues, but also more notoriety as a world -class destination. I am available to answer any questions that you may have. Sincerely, Danilo Kawasaki, CF°, CWA° Vice -President and COO, Gerber Kawasaki Wealth & Investment Management 2716 Ocean Park Blvd. #2022 Santa Monica, CA 9045 (310) 1-9393 (31) 1-9982 fax CA Insurance Lic. # OD68977 www.GerberKawasaki.com ................................................................................................................................ Da_ni_lo.@GerberKawasaki.com. .I[.il_ �m:b A..i:.irl o_ikyt.g_ E.L:y h._�'��:�....II_Jind(i',,ir_4 �._�I dVils�, (''�iIIa_VI \�4�6:I1i���'1wILII��I..I.. I;_LVGLI°4_iC)A 1.1)._Ir. V] L�.li��li:).�`...II�A�.III;?._AII_�1��...lL.0F.._I_0Si: You r 47(page 1 of 2 �9�(to�r �A � �i f� .,� r �„ „,n��lt Advisory Services offered through Gerber Kawasaki Inc., a SIE.0 registered investment advisor. SIEC registration dues not imply an endorsement from the agency. AIII investments have risk and (past performance its not iindlicatuve of future iresullts. Certified Financial Pllanner'm Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFF ", CERTIFIED TIIFIIED FINANCIAL. IPILAENINIE::R"' and CFIF" (with flame logo)" in the U.S., which it awards to undividuuals who successfully complete CFF1" Board's initial and ongoing certification requirements. The information contained in this ernaiill message is being transmitted to and is intended for the use of only lindividuall(s) to whore it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the untended recipient, you are hereby advised that any dissemination, distrubu,rtion or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, (please immediately delete. 47�Page 2 of 2 Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 11:22:10 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Re: Knox, Gary: Coral Mtn Resort Comments on the Gamlin Guest Column Date: Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 11:21:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Nicole Criste To: Monika Radeva From: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Date: Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 10:19 AM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov>, Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Laurie McGinley <Imcginley@laquintaca.gov>, Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Knox, Gary: Coral Mtn Resort Comments on the Gamlin Guest Column Comments below for today's staff report on the Coral Mountain Resort project. All comments going forward will be processed by the Clerk's Office and will be included as "written public comments" for the 5/17/2022 Council meeting. Thank you. I�� IM iii�� iii Ike IN , �����; ��� ;" ` �u �^;�� �. �:!��'����� u�i�°����. II itilit li�:)f IILl � Q .lii in t i �°i" 'I : 1II Ila.Jint, C,4 1 25 I! i.. i,� ...w ...W..,w MRadeva-@ aquintaca.gov From: Gary Knox Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2022 7:45 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Comments on the Gamlin Guest Column --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I XTERNAIL. This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mayor and City Council Members: Open the morning newspaper, tune in any evening tv news broadcast, surf the internet. Regardless of one's source(s) for what's happening day-by-day around the globe, there's one topic every news source addresses today that affects the current La Quinta debate about whether a wave basin should be allowed on the Coral Mountain Resort grounds. Simply put, the media stories declare that the West has run dry. Fresh water is disappearing. Images of broadening white rings around the shorelines of Lake Mead, Lake Powell, Lake 47EPage 1 of 3 Shasta, Lake Oroville and far too many others illustrate the tragic saga. We now find ourselves on the front lines of the most brutal drought in the West in over 1200 years. As mounting evidence of this unprecedented drought reached headline proportions, the Desert Sun called the wave basin idea a "frivolous water -wasting project" I just read the "Valley Voice: Opinion" guest column in the Sun penned last week by John Gamlin, president of CM Wave Development LLC and the determined developer of the wave basin project. He challenged the editorial position of the newspaper, specifically for what he calls their "mischaracterizations" about the Coral Mountain Resort wave basin project. While the newspaper may have mischaracterized a thing or two, their overall message was spot on. The problem for the project is not any descriptive mischaracterizations but rather that Mr. Gamlin's timing for constructing the wave basin is terrible. I don't think that Mr. Gamlin's project would be frivolous in another age. He's serious and his facility is apparently well -conceived, but I can't imagine how his timing could be any poorer. He acknowledges that the wave basin will lose significant water each day. That is the crux of the problem since we cannot ignore that our surrounding area — for hundreds of miles — is parched with no significant moisture relief in sight. For example, the city of our county seat now requires residents to ration water, as does the whole of San Bernardino County to our immediate north. Moreover the governor has called on all Californians to cut their water use by 15% and more stringent restrictions lie ahead on June 1. Mr. Gamlin seeks to justify the wave basin's loss of water by comparing it to the much greater volume that he contends golf courses lose. His assertion that the wave basin will use only 10-15% of golf course irrigation usage triggers my response that we better soon take a very hard look at golf course watering and see how to rein that in. But that's for another time. Not here. In his column he suggests that reclaimed water could be used for his facility. It is, he says, used in his company's Lemoore, CA, wave basin. He makes no commitment, however, to restricting his water source to reclaimed water here. He never tells us that he intends to fill the basin with previously used and treated water. Yet through his choice of words, he has led readers to believe that he will use only reclaimed water. We face a huge conundrum when seeking to rely on reclaimed water as a viable alternative to otherwise potable water in any situation, including for the Coral Mountain wave machine. In total we have only a limited volume of reclaimed water. I don't know how much that is in La Quinta, but I assume that what we hold is already fully allocated to irrigate parks, roadway medians, street parkways, possibly some golf courses, and similar non -domestic uses. That's a good, if not ideal, use. But once the demand for the reclaimed water exceeds the supply, the situation takes an evil turn. Suddenly we must substitute fresh/potable water to replace the promised previously used water. As the Desert Sun implores, the times don't allow us to make that trade. Indeed we cannot frivolously (or otherwise) waste any clean water and that includes not allowing potable water to replace any shortfall supply of reclaimed water. On the other hand, if we are throwing away a certain amount of untreated water that cannot be reclaimed because there is no treatment plant, the construction of a treatment facility by the wave 47gPage 2 of 3 basin developer might offer a great solution for the city and the project. It would meet a classic definition of a bona fide mitigation. But I'm unsure whether such a trade-off would be politically viable now. The political dimension is very real here. So let's examine the wave basin approval issue from a broader public perspective. Turn again to your source of news. Lakes Mead, Powell, Shasta and Oroville -- the latter two are California's two biggest reservoirs — loom bigger every day in the media as the remaining water volume shrinks dramatically. With each successive news image we are shown that the once plentiful water in each has fallen still further, now to levels never before recorded so low in early May. And with these pictures we hear stories about devastations that are about to hit us because of these critically low water supplies. Now suppose that the proposed water basin were to be approved by the La Quinta City Council and neither the state nor other water resource authorities subsequently intervened to stop it. In that scenario I predict that the Coral Mountain Resort Wave Basin will make nasty headlines for La Quinta. Pictures of our new water -wasting surfing facility will be unceremoniously juxtaposed alongside the disasters unrolling at Mead, Powell, Shasta and Oroville — and beyond. Some pictures will show desperate farmers, citywide blackouts, baked lawns, small creeks meandering through thirsty lake beds, etc. Next to these disaster scenes, folks across the nation will see a photo of our wave basin. The picture from the wave basin will be selected to emphasize that some people thumb their noses at the historic water crisis. Oh, they'll realize, those people are in La Quinta, CA. At that point we can shout "mischaracterization" all we want. But to no avail. Viewers around our country will see our community as one that thinks it's okay to waste precious water even though our closest neighbors and most westerners have been mandated to follow water rationing schedules as they further experience periodic electrical brownouts. This scenario would not portray La Quinta in a positive light. Permission to establish the wave basin is clearly environmentally wrong. Thumbing our noses at others who face real hardship with the loss of potable water is morally wrong. And politically it hasn't a chance, it is politically wrong throughout any period of drought. Please vote NO. I wish you all the best in handling this controversy. I fully understand much of what you're facing since I've endured similar hot topic events that brought out persons who vehemently questioned courses of action the school board with whom I worked was considering. Sincerely, Gary A. Knox La Quinta, CA 92253 Sent from Mail for Windows 48CPage 3 of 3 Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2022 6:02 PM To: Consulting Planner; Tania Flores Cc: Monika Radeva Subject: Knox, Gary 2022-05-09 Mitigating the Impact of Water Loss by the Coral Mountain Wave Basin Comments provided below by Mr. Gary Knox regarding the Coral Mountain Resort project to be included in the project file. Thank you. IMoinlilka IRadeva, i,.:, Afl:- I Ct'11,, „ (hE rk: Ot''1�, ii:)f IIL...�� „� u a u to wi I9 C IIIIIIe Il an'i " k'i), III a Q,,Onta, CA 925 IIl iw6i�.i �: 5 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 9:56 AM To: Gary Knox Cc: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; bihrke@rutan.com Subject: RE: Mitigating the Impact of Water Loss by the Coral Mountain Wave Basin Gary, Thank you for a very informative email and I can assure you that it will be included in our public comments going thru the hearing process. I look forward to meeting with you as we go thru the process although with the treat of litigation on this project, our legal counsel has advised the city council to not make any determinations on the project prior to the hearing process. As a native Coachella Valley resident I am very sensitive to our environment and projects proposed for development. Again, thank you for your time. J Ilh in Pefia I Member of the City Council City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 vyyv ..J.. jn t a.0 a �y ...1P�..y. ....... .....P.O... . ... ...... 481 From: Gary Knox Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 8:46 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laguintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@lag uintaca.gov>; John Pena <ipena@laguintaca.eov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laguintaca.eov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Jon McMillen <imcmillen@laguintaca.gov>; cityclerk@laguintaca.gov Subject: Mitigating the Impact of Water Loss by the Coral Mountain Wave Basin t"X't ERNAU This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Mayor and Council Members: Last week I shared with you my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Resort surfing facility. The sole reason for my opposition remains the loss of fresh water (whether directly or indirectly). We know that any water used by the facility will necessarily evaporate. But the global threat to our survival brought on by he changing climates means that we can't afford to waste a drop. In light of these deteriorating environmental conditions a move such as the developers propose would be a disingenuous use of scarce water in the midst of our unprecedented catastrophic drought. As the resort's proposal is presented to you from the planning commission, therefore, I ask that you each vote NO. On the other hand, big moves and some roll -up -the -sleeves work could make the effort a viable, paradigm - shifting reality, though still problematic. To be clear, my hardcore opposition is not against the facility per se, but against the tragic loss of otherwise accessible water that one day soon will not reach La Quinta kitchen faucets. Understand that my personal aquatic background and my prior political activities show my otherwise keen support for such a facility. For example, in the past decade as a board member of a central Oregon HOA I promoted, and our resort community passed, a bond issue to build a multi -million dollar water park. Though not as elaborate as the Coral Mountain Resort proposal, it is extensive. I would certainly reconsider supporting the Coral Mountain proposal if certain steps were taken to offset the inevitable loss of useable domestic water as a condition of its approval. After offering my reasons previously for opposing the Coral Mountain Resort proposal — based on my own experiences and layman's knowledge of the consequences, I set out to investigate further. I wanted to determine, for example, how much water would likely be lost if this private surfing lagoon were approved. Let me jump in here at the outset to share the conclusion I reached. I found that the environmental downside of the facility could be effectively mitigated by any of several different means. Basically, as you'll read below, it comes down to the adoption of one or more possible 'cap and trade' solutions. But only you can require such mitigations should, as city council members, you decide to advance the project. In my investigation my first task was to assess what a trade-off requirement might be (that is, what is the impact of the loss that needs addressing?). I found that determining any likely water loss is surprisingly problematic. Yet all who have tackled similar problems concede that loss is significantly real. In their pursuits various agencies and academic institutions have sought to come up with precise formulas to calculate real losses. What they conclude among them, however, is widely disparate since so many variables are at work — air temperature, water temperature, local terrain, humidity, wind, soil conditions, etc. MM As a lay person in all this I chose to follow an often cited "rule of thumb" that says that losses (taking in all the variables) stand at roughly one -quarter of an inch per day, year-round. This is necessarily a "back -of the napkin" approach but one that carries scholarly weight. And, as found acceptable in the Phoenix, AZ -area, such a rough estimate seemingly will work pretty well for a similarly impacted, desert -dwelling La Quinta. So beginning with this reasonable fractional number for our calculations and rounding off that quarter -inch -daily estimate over 365 days (i.e., a quarter -of -an -inch times 365 days a year) we find a total evaporative loss of roughly 100 inches per year. This stands at nearly eight feet of water loss annually. Large amounts of water are commonly described in acre-feet, that is, an acre-foot equals the amount of water contained in a foot of water spread over an acre of land. And each acre-foot equals slightly less than one-third of a million gallons. Having calculated above that our presumed water loss each year nears eight feet means that something like two -and -a -half million gallons of water annually disappears (one-third of a million gallons times eight feet) for each surface acre of non -flowing water (including in our proposed water basin). The important question then becomes, what impact will that amount of loss directly have annually on La Quinta's residents? Generally an acre-foot of water is said to provide water for two to two -and -a -half households per year. Phoenix did a recent study, however, that showed that with conservation efforts (which appear to be on the horizon as a mandatory practice within the Coachella Valley -- as it was in the 2010s) each acre-foot could serve some four households for an entire year, every year. (A household in the Phoenix study was a family of four.) Thus the eight acre-feet of loss will directly affect between 32 and 64 residents for each acre of surface water times the number of acres in the surfing lagoon. I understand that the developers proposed 16.6 acres as the surface water footprint for the project. That would mean that water to households would be annually lost to at least 531 La Quinta residents but could impact over 1000 locals. This equates to some two -and -a -half percent of La Quinta's population. Depressingly, I expect that the 1000 number is closer to real since my initial "rule of thumb" measurement accounts for only "still" water calculations, not water that is further exposed to a condition that knowingly hits the La Quinta area. Here's what I mean. I spent eight full summers and more as a beach lifeguard (and surfer) in Manhattan Beach, CA. There I saw the primary effects of Santa Ana winds on six-foot waves (the height that the basin developers see as optimal for their proposed facility). First, when the wind directly hits the face of any wave, the wind delays the crashing of the wave so a surfer can often get a very much longer ride. But secondly, as the wind rips over the top of each wave it blows jets of water into the air, and few of these drops fall back to the surface. Such atomized wind-borne water simply evaporates! While the developers apparently do not favor operating their facility in blustery conditions, the wind does blow in La Quinta, sometimes fiercely, and the facility will undoubtedly operate at times when measurable winds howl. So any wind hitting against any wave will cause more loss than the calculated still water "rule -of -thumb" implied. This means yet another net negative for water retention within their wave basin. Moreover, my rough calculations above do not address at all the water loss that will occur when the water basin is initially filled. This I calculate to be a one-time loss of 166 acre-feet, or close to fifty-five million (55,000,000) gallons of water. This lost volume does, indeed, exceed even the annual water loss when the wave basin functions. So how, then, might the project overcome my concerns about the likely losses of our now diminishing fresh water resources? I offer several means of mitigation that could, at minimum, approach or exceed a net zero score. Only you, the developer, and local and regional water authorities, however, can assess whether any one or combination of various mitigation possibilities would work for this project. But the global environmental changes we now face require some direct effort to offset the predicted loss of precious water by this project. In the end, we need zero loss as a minimum; a net gain would be highly desirable. 3 483 1. 1 had personal water professional friends in Yuma, AZ (Bureau of Reclamation, local irrigation district). They shared that water districts, for example, were replacing open water delivery channels with underground pipes. The burying of water channels eliminates open -to -the -air evaporation. A condition of the Coral Mountain Resort approval could be that the developer invest in a similar Coachella Valley Water District project, for example, that would save as much fresh water as the wave basin will dissipate into the atmosphere. 2. A similar effort could be taken with area farmers in which the developer would help them convert from their current above watering systems (e.g., flood irrigation, sprinklers) and install underground irrigation means. In this scenario they would be required to invest to the extent that the farmers in their upgrades would be saving as much water each year as the Coral Mountain Resort facility stands to lose. 3. An alternative might be to develop public -private partnership(s) in which some water -saving project is worked out with Lake Cahuilla authorities (or the City of La Quinta or Riverside County) to offset the Coral Mountain losses. 4. Another attack on the evaporation problem, but not a definitive solution, would find the wave basin shut down anytime the wind hits a certain speed for a specified length of time. In this case regulators would have to estimate how much water was reasonably saved over a year. This calculation would, however, only lower the amount of mitigation required by the surfing lagoon operators. 5. Many homeowners effectively combat evaporation from their swimming pools and larger water features. They simply cover those water bodies when not in use with evaporation covers such as bubble blankets, floating ball blankets, solar rings, etc. Thus the developer could establish a fund which La Quinta homeowners, as well as possibly local resorts and golf courses, could tap to offset some percentage of their future purchase of similar products. The fund amount would need to equal the cost of purchasing devices that together equal the 16.6 acres of the wave basin. 6. Or the developer could be required to drill wells to inject purified reclaimed water into our aquafer. The amount of injected water would necessarily have to equal the amount annually lost to evaporation. Naturally this possibility would have to meet environmental and legal standards and restrictions. I do not believe that using reclaimed water as a mitigating offset by irrigating, for instance, golf course fairways, park shrubbery or road median plantings, is a worthy trade-off. While previously commendable, these offsets do not save or create fresh water for domestic use since this reclaimed water immediately evaporates and is lost. 7. Another possible solution could limit the water in the lagoon to exclusively reclaimed water -- from the first drop that falls in when initially filling the basin to the last drop ever used in operating the facility. The burden to improve the quality of water between its source (sewage plant?) and putting it in the lagoon rests fully with the owner of the facility. Yet, even as each drop of reclaimed water is lost, pressure on our fresh water resources will continue to build at an alarming rate. That's because the limited uses for any reclaimed water demands can be hardly satisfied with the available reclaimed water. That means that at that point fresh water must necessarily make up for the waste water deficiency. My investigation has ended. I urge you to follow one of two actions when the planning commission approval for the Coral Mountain Resort proposal appears as a city council meeting agenda item. Either: • Vote NO to squelch the proposal entirely. or MM • Table the motion for later approval until after the city and the developer agree to carry out sufficient, specified mitigation efforts that will fully offset the loss of all water caused by operation of the surfing lagoon. Our planet desperately needs the help of each of us. The La Quinta City Council can help as it has the opportunity to sidestep a clearly negative practice. Please do not make things worse by failing to do one of the two above actions. Indeed for the survival of our grandchildren and their offspring I ask you, as the leadership of the City of La Quinta, to take these steps, if not the specifics at least in the spirit I have offered. You will be protecting a goodly measure of the increasingly diminishing water resources that still remain in our Coachella Valley. Sincerely, Gary A. Knox La Quinta, CA 92253 Sent from Mail for Windows MW Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 2:18 PM To: Dan Markus; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Markus, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Dan Markus Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 1:33 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Hi, My name is Dan Markus and I currently live in Southern California. I wanted to briefly share my thoughts and support for the Coral Mountain Wave Project. As you can probably guess, I am an avid surfer and I have been fortunate enough to have ridden this new technology in wave machines. It would be a dream opportunity for me and my family to enjoy the desert and have accessible this man made wave. I am very receptive to investing more time and money in this La Quinta project and the community. I am hoping this project receives final approval and can break ground as soon as possible. Regards, Dan Markus Malibu, CA 90265 MW Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 7:58 PM To: Consulting Planner; Tania Flores Subject: Coral Mtn Resort: Myrmo, Morgan (STVR) written comments - 17 MAY 2022 Meeting Attachments: STVR comments 4 May 2022.pdf; STVR comments 4 May 2022.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged I have confirmed "receipt" and will include in the 5/17/22 meeting, but since these comments are related to the Coral Mountain Resort project, I am forwarding to you to include in the project file. Thank you. IM o iii°m ii Ik IRadeva, iI;°'t,IC I Ot'1111,11, O c w.k MRadeva@laquintaca.aov From: morgan myrmo Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 6:41 PM To: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Myrmo, Morgan (STVR) written comments - 17 MAY 2022 Meeting EXTERNAL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Aloha Monika, Would you please share my letter (attached in PDF & Word) for the next City Council meeting? I belive this to be May 17, 2022. re: STVRs/New Development Thanks! Morgan Myrmo IMPORTANT Never trust wiring instructions sent via email. Cyber criminals are hacking email accounts and sending emails with fake wiring instructions. These emails are convincing and sophisticated. Always independently confirm wiring instructions in person or via a telephone call to a trusted and verified phone number. Never wire money without double-checking that the wiring instructions are correct. i 487 La Quinta New Development Zoning: Serving the Elite 4 May 2022 Dear City Clerk Monika Radeva, I fear the combination of short-term vacation rental (STVR) density deceleration, coupled with the new Tourist Commercial (TC District)/other STVR-approved zone designations, may not serve the best interests of current STVR operators. The density deceleration of non -permitted STVR areas, such in the La Quinta Cove, continue to reduce the number of mom -and -pops thriving in the local tourism -housing industry. While limiting density here is understandable, the city must acknowledge that these new regulations have forced La Quinta STVR investors to solely pursue TC Districts, or other STVR-approved districts, to continue or expand their footprint in providing short-term housing solutions. While this may be a good thing, I fear the new TC District zones, under current guidance from the City of La Quinta, appear to only facilitate investments from the rich, or from corporations or investor groups, while neglecting the mom -and -pops. For example, how is a home -owner in the cove, with an income of $60,000 per year, able to finance a $1.3 million home in PGA Signature, or a $1 million+ condo at Kelly Slater's new surf park? The truth is they can't. In fact, most local business owners that support STVR housing will not be able to buy into these elite new properties. Coupled with the slow decline in homes for rent, as well as limited "budget -friendly" STVR options (such as Legacy Villas), the average tourist will likely shift to more affordable locations outside city limits. One solution would be to create a new mandate in TC developments, where smaller, affordable units must be set aside for current STVR owners to purchase and operate. Remember, these are the people who have paid into the TOT coffers for several years, while supporting their own cleaning, landscape, and maintenance crews that also rely on such income from tourist housing. Without creative solutions like this, in 10 years most of the tourist housing income will go to investor groups and elites who can afford high -end properties. While this may be beneficial from a tax collection perspective, it shows no allegiance to those who rightfully deserve a shot to stay in business. Personally, as an STVR owner, I'd like to stay in business, continue to support my team, and continue to pay my taxes to support the City of La Quinta. Due to my history as an STVR-owner, I could testify for hours to I have done, personally, to make La Quinta a better place. I may not be "rich," however I am "great" for the city, and I'd like a "fair" shot. If Kelly Slater is forced to build 50 units, or even half his units, under $500k, his people will still make money. While Kelly Slater, Kim Kardashian, and the Madison Club are cool, doesn't the City want to take care of its own, also? Best regards, Morgan Myrmo 0, oe, , pl-2et,J CA 923 P Y 202'�' P147 L 73 7— Q exp L'i P441YfAW "PoCAA. d, ctl L, Lk 1, Ck 4f e: Ito LQ'C'�) u wl r L,A IP mm Tania Flores From: Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 6:23 PM To: Plannin WebMail- Consultin Planner, - Cc: Subject: Water amounts EXTERI' ALw This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. HELLO PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS & DESERT SUN: AT THE LAST PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SURFPARK PROJECT, DALE TYERMAN REPEATED SOMETHING JOHN GAMLIN HAD SAID ABOUT THE WAVE BASIN USING ONLY 13% OF THE PROJECT'S WATER. REALLY??? THAT SEEMS INCREDIBLY HARD TO BELIEVE. SO ... GIVEN THE LATEST PROJECTIONS ABOUT DECLINING AVAILABILITY OF COLORADO RIVER WATER... 0."u. t. swww.cnn.com 2022 04 0 us west-drou . .di mate.....................................................Ih : ...AND HOW THIS DECLINE WILL REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF WATER CVWD IS COUNTING ON ... WE MUST ASK MERIWETHER TO PROVIDE EXACT FIGURES FOR THE WATER USAGE OF EVERY PART OF THEIR PROPOSED PROJECT. AND BY EXACT, WE DO NOT MEAN VAGUE ESTIMATES COUCHED IN TERMS THAT MAKE EVERYTHING SOUND GOOD. THEY NEED TO PROVIDE EXACT FIGURES FOR & EXPLANATIONS OF: A) THE AMOUNT OF WATER REQUIRED TO FILL THE WAVE BASIN B) WHERE IS THAT WATER COMING FROM C) IS IT BEING TREATED ... AND IF SO, WHERE AND HOW (ARE CHEMICALS BEING KEPT ON THE PROPERTY FOR WATER TREATMENT) D) THE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT WILL BE LOST FROM THE WAVE BASIN DUE TO EVAPORATION E) THE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT WILL NEED TO BE ADDED & HOW OFTEN TO KEEP THE WAVE BASIN FULL F) THE AMOUNT OF WATER IN OTHER WATER FEATURES ON THE PROPERTY — POOLS (HOW MANY), LAGOONS (FOR PADDLEBOARDING, ETC.), FOUNTAINS G) THE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT WILL BE USED AT THE HOTEL H) THE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT WILL BE USED AT THE RESTAURANTS 1) THE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT WILL BE USED FOR ALL THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT J) THE AMOUNT OF WATER FOR LANDSCAPING K) HOW WILL ALL OF THE ABOVE BE AFFECTED BY WATER USE RESTRICTIONS — BY THE STATE, BY THE COUNTY, BY THE CITY ONLY WITH THESE FIGURES CAN INFORMED DECISIONS BE MADE ABOUT THIS PROJECT. EVERYONE WE KNOW BELIEVES THIS IS AN UNBELIEVABLY IRRESPONSIBLE PROJECT TO BE CONSIDERING IN OUR CURRENT WATER CRISIS. THANK YOU. BRIDGETT & PHIL NOVAK LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 4:53 PM To: Ivana Paige; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Paige, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Ivana Paige Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 3:08 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support EXTERNAIJ This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To the City Council of La Quinta, I hope you are having a wonderful day! I am emailing you because I wanted to voice my support in moving forward with Coral Mountain. I am 31 years young, and was born and raised in Los Angeles. Throughout my life, the main reason I would visit the desert was primarily for Coachella, or to see my friend's grandparents. Unfortunately, if it's not due to festivals, most of my generation associates the desert with the elderly, and because of this, I strongly believe Coral Mountain will open the eyes to a vast majority of people! I can genuinely say that if Coral Mountain gets built, I will spend a lot of time at the luxurious hotel! I have never surfed before, until I went to Lemoore to try the prototype wave, and it was easily the best weekend of my life! What people do not understand until they experience it for themselves, is that the wave is more than "surfing." Experiencing the wave made me feel like I could face my fears, accomplish whatever I set my mind to, and it created such a special bond between myself and the random people I had met surfing that weekend; and that is something I wish everyone could experience! I truly hope to have a family of my own by the time Coral Mountain gets built, because I would love more than anything to incorporate this "magical" place into my family's traditions, and because it's not far from Los Angeles, I would easily come at least once a month to enjoy a weekend of innocent, fun, life changing experiences with my friends and family (and I can guarantee we will make a plethora of new, like-minded friends as well)! Because of how strongly I am in support of this project, there is no doubt in my mind that the world could use Coral Mountain now, more than ever! 491 Thank you for your time and consideration, Ivana Paige Steelman 492 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 4:55 PM To: Timothy Pappas; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro; City Clerk Mail Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Pappas, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Timothy Pappas Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 3:46 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support EXTEMYAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear La Quinta City Government; I am a homeowner at Andalusia Country Club and feel that it's important to write and express my support for the Coral Mountain Wave Project. As a younger family, we purchased a home in La Quinta during the pandemic and have enjoyed the experience of desert living. We constantly look for activities to undertake as a family. Golf and tennis are great, but surfing, biking, yoga, and many other amenities planned for Coral Mountain will add significant diversity to this part of the valley. Living a healthy, active lifestyle is important to us and we know that the families that will be attracted to the Coral Mountain Wave Project will have a lot in common with us and our neighbors. I think that the few potential issues that have been expressed (light at night and noise) are not significant and can be mitigated easily if (and that's a big "if") they should materialize. We live across Madison Street from this planned development and have zero concerns. Thank you for helping to bring this exciting project to life! Sincerely, Tim Pappas 493 La Quinta, California Timothy A. Pappas EI Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:16 AM To: Spencer Plumb; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Plumb, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Spencer Plum Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:05 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support EXTEMYAI: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. I would like to see the Coral Mountain project in La Quinta move forward. I have enjoyed Kelly Slater's original wave in Lemoore, CA several times and would love to have one closer to home. The technology is amazing and this wave is 2nd to none. I am a potential investor in this project and other real estate in your area. I would also be interested in buying a home at this project. Thank you for your support, Spencer G. Plumb President & CEO Sabin Holdings, LLC 17180 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92128 Cell: 858-717-7666 Spencer@sabinholdings.com 495 Monday, May ,16,,2022 irt 09:06:18 Pacific Daylight Time Subfect- FW: FYl- It's Not, A. Matter Of If But When —Water "SHAMING" &GUIILTwi I I be the, Byproduct, Of La Quinta's & Coachella 'alleys TGNE-DEAF Approval Of Surf Parks & Lagoons For, The Mega Rich During The Mega: Drought Date: Monday, May 16, 2022 at 8:21:17AM Pacific Daylight Time From Cheri Flores To: Tania Flares cc�, Consulting Plainneir, Danny Castro, Attachments: image001.png See, correspondence below. Ctieri Flores I Planmng Manager Design, & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Caille Tampico La, QWnta, CiA 92253 Ph., (760)777-70617 1--mmmmmn <Rradi@Iaquintaca,.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@laq ui ntaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick. <kfi,tz.patrick@laquiinitaca,.gov>,; John Pena <jpena@I1aquimtaca.,gov>; Cheri Flores <clfiores@11aquinta,ca.gov> Subject: FYl- It's Not A Matter Of If But Wfien ... Water "SHAMING" & GUILT will be the ByProduct Of La Mega Drought EX"rEFI,Pi,A,I-^Thus ,ML-ss,agf, or, Egmatedautside of the City of LaQulma.. Please, uy proper judgempntandicaudion when opening A acho-nents, dicking links or res,�mnding to requesis [of 4-tiormation. m�� Approving SURF -PARKS in La Quinta & The Coachella Valley During This Unprecedented Catastrophic Mega -drought for the Mega -Rich Is Not Only TONE-DEAF but will come back to bring shame and derision on the City of LaQuinta & Entire Coachella Valley for approving these OBSCENE & FRIVOLOUS wastes of our precious and vanishing water. Everyday it becomes more inevitable. Lush SoCal Landscapes, Lawns & Turf Are Going Away Quickly......... SoCal's environment and visual look is completely changing, almost overnight. Water "SHAMING" will become a very big cultural thing. This will apply to high -end golf course / country clubs / lushly landscaped homes, lagoons and Surf -Parks. The Class / Elite Privilege & Entitlment Will BE Too Glaring To Ignore. This "Shaming" will be aimed directly at LaQuinta and the Coachella Valley. How can any City or Development In The SoCal Desert Approve These Profligate Wastes And Expect The Public & Press To Ignore This Environmental & Societal Abuse Of This Rapidly Vanishing Resource? It is no longer business as usual for the Coachella Valley. To act otherwise is just TONE-DEAF WHISTLING IN THE GRAVEYARD. httpE://www.nytimes.com/202 10 /0 /di m ate/las-vegas-I awn-grass-ba n. ht m I Where Lawns Are Outlawed (and 1 Up, and Carted Away) With drought and growth taking a toll on the Colorado River, the source of go percent of the region's water, a new law in Las Vegas mandates the removal of turf, patch by patch. 49�Page 2 of 3 No Lawns /Non -Functional Turf Are Next For SoCAL... https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/new-la-water-restrictions-conservation-drought-mayor- garcetti-ladwp/2889703/ What are the new outdoor water restrictions in Los Angeles? Outdoor watering will be limited for LADWP customers to two days per week, starting June 1. That's a change from the current limit of three days per week. Homeowners will be assigned two watering days per week based on even- and odd -number addresses. Watering will be permitted at odd -numbered street addresses on Mondays and Fridays, and at even -numbered addresses on Thursdays and Sundays. The city also strongly recommends using pool covers to decrease evaporation of pool water and washing vehicles at commercial car wash businesses. That's in addition to existing watering restrictions, which include limiting watering with sprinklers to eight minutes per station and using water conserving nozzles limited to 15 minutes per station. All watering will have to be done in the evening or early morning, with no watering permitted outdoors between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. People who don't follow the rules will receive a warning, followed by increasing fines for subsequent violations. Truly, A Very Rapid Repudiation of the California Dream Is Becoming A Reality ............ 49EPage 3 of 3 Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 09.,46:53 Pacific Daylight'Time Subject: FW: Congress and QSA Agreements Confirm Colorado River, Water, Is Delivered for IRRIGATION & POTABLE PURPOSES, IT IS NOT CONSIDERED NON -Pi TADLE® As such it shou�ld be, conserved as, all Domes-hc Water is required by the New Emergency State Guidelines. Date: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 8:20:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time From; Cheri Flores To: Consulting Planner, Tania Flores Attachments, imageOO1.ping, CJSA AGREEMENT FOR POTABLE, PURPOSES.pdf, CRW POTABLE WATER I110 LAW OF THE RIVER,pdf Clieri Fimnes I Planning, Manager Design, & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle'Tamplco I La. Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760)1777-706,7 CL'F1orPs,(a)La10W ,w w w,, LaQu i r� ta CA�Iqp v Steve Sanchez <ssanche,z@laquiintaca.,g�ov>, Robert Radii <Rradi@Ia,quintaca,g'ov>; Uincla EvainsLevans@l:aqu'irytaca,gov>; Katlen Fitzpatrick <kfi,tzpatrick@l,aquinitaca�.,gov>; John Kenai <jpena@Iaqujntaca.goV>; Cheri Flores <cl1flores@laquiin,taca.gcrv> Subject: Congress and QSA Agreements Confirm Colorado River Water Is Delivered for IRRIGATION & POTABLE PURPOSES., IT IS NOT CONSIDERED ON -POTABLE. ,As such it should be conserved as all Domestic Wateris required by the New, Emergency State, Guidelines. .......................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................... EXIFRPIAI,: I, f&I'Th-Ssage, (Yrigiriated r-mitside of tliv CRy uf I a Qgpimla, Please iise properjudgcmiemt @ rid caution Mien open[ngattachrnents, dickinE links or responding to reqUeStS for infon-nah"on. mm�� Stakeholders, The following should make clear that CVWD's rewriting of history for their allocation of Colorado River Water(CRW) being Non -Potable is false. CRW, by law, is for Irrigation and potable purposes. The newest Statewide Emergency Guidelines State that the application of potable water cannot be applied to Non - Functional Purposes: (1) "Commercial, industrial and institutional" refers to commercial water users, industrial water users, and institutional water users as respectively defined in Water Code, section 10608.12, subdivisions (e), (i), and (j), and includes homeowners' associations, common interest developments, community service organizations, and other similar entities but does not include the residences of these entities' members or separate interests. (5) "Non-functional turf" means turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events. Nonfunctional turf does not include sports fields and turf that is regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events. (e) (1) To prevent the unreasonable use of water and to promote water conservation, the use of potable water is prohibited for the irrigation of non- functional turf at commercial, industrial, and institutional sites. "Any part of the golf course that is being used for the game of golf, such as the greens and the fairways, are functional, " said Edward Ortiz, a spokesperson for the state water board. "However, water agencies and golf courses need to evaluate whether other turf on a golf course property is functional or not. " 50CPage 2 of 4 This NON -Function Water Ban would extend to all Driving Ranges and Current "out-of- bounds" areas on Golf Courses. In addition, a very strong can be made water only being used for the greens and fairways. This would be a "links -style course" such as Desert Willow in Palm Desert. Obviously, Surf Parks, Lagoons, Water Features all are considered NON -Functional and an UNREASONABLE USE OF WATER under these guidelines. I have attached 2 files directly on point. You can find many such references to the actual Boulder Canyon Agreement and the Agreements between CVWD & IID. All Colorado River Water Delivered To CVWD is For IRRIGATION AND POTABLE PURPOSES. COLORADO RIVER WATER IS CONSIDERED POTABLE UNDER THE QSA & BOULDER CANYON AGREEMENTS. It is also used by MWD and San Diego Water District For Potable Purposes. It is true the CVWD must treat Colorado River Water for Drinking Water Purposes but they also must treat all groundwater for drinking water purposes. CVWD misleads the public by saying Colorado River Water is Non -Potable as Congress and all agreements for this water clearly show it to be for potable purposes. CVWD should be required to follow State Water Resources Control Board's mandatory emergency restrictions as to all Domestic Water in the State. CVWD's Board continues to game the public and the state by the "FICTION' of Colorado River Water Being Non -Potable. The law and facts do not bear this out. Whether CVWD delivers this water to Golf Courses, HOA's, Lagoons, Surf -Parks via Groundwater, Canal Water or even a small mix of recycled with Canal Waterless than 10%) they are not adhering to the State Mandates for Domestic Water. 2003 QSA AGREEMENT BETWEEN III) AND CVWD - B. cvwD is a county water district organized under the California County Water District Law, codified at §§ 30000 et seq. of the California Water Code, and delivers Colorado River water in Riverside County, California for irrigation and potable purposes. 501Page 3 of 4 BOULDER CANYON PROJECT ACT [PUBL IC -NO. 642-70TH CONGRESS) [H. R. 5773] no charge shall be made for water or for the use, storage, or delivery of water for irrigation or water for potable purposes in the Imperial or Coachella Valleys; Section 1 of the Project Act, which provided for the dam at Black Canyon, also authorized the construction of a new canal, the All -American Canal, which would replace the Alamo Canal and would traverse only territory located in the United States. A new diversion dam for Imperial Valley water was also authorized. Section 1 went on to provide that no charge should be made for the storage or delivery of irrigation or -potable water to Imperial or Coachella Valley_ 502Page 4 of 4 Tania Flores From: Cheri Flores Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 9:54 AM To: Tania Flores Cc: Consulting Planner; Danny Castro Subject: FW: IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS BY NOW .... RESCIND ALL APRPOVALS AND FUTURE APPROVALS OF SURF -PARKS, LAGOONS, WATER FEATURE AND REQUIRE ALL COCHELLA GOLF COURSE TO GO "LINKS -STYLE ONLY FUNCTIONAL PORTIONS CAN BE WATERED PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CM RESORT. lhellrlil Floires I Planning Manager Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760)777-7067 .II::::Ellaca .c�.Quliir toCA,, ov rrnm r.:...11::::..Q a ii Imta CA„ From: Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 4:33 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jPena @laquintaca.gov>; Subject: IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS BY NOW.... RESCIND ALL APRPOVALS AND FUTURE APPROVALS OF SURF -PARKS, LAGOONS, WATER FEATURE AND REQUIRE ALL COCHELLA GOLF COURSE TO GO "LINKS -STYLE ONLY FUNCTIONAL PORTIONS CAN BE WATERED VI T'VI RIVAIL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. All interested persons and Stakeholders, This just came in from the La Times: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-05-24/california-bans-watering- of-non-functional-grass?mc cid=8965f63fa6&mc eid=5f26efca65 503 The regulations define "non-functional" turf as grass that is "solely ornamental" and not regularly used for recreational purposes or community events. "Any part of the golf course that is being used for the game of golf, such as the greens and the fairways, are functional," said Edward Ortiz, a spokesperson for the state water board. "However, water agencies and golf courses need to evaluate whether other turf on a golf course property is functional or not." It is abundantly clear. All current and pending approvals for Surf -Parks, Lagoons, Water Features must be rescinded and revisited at a later date if the Mega -Drought conditions subside. All of CVWD's water comes from the Colorado River and natural run-off. A very little amount of reclaimed water is mixed with Colorado River Water Via the MVP to become NON -Potable. This water is only used for Golf Courses and Landscaping. Since the vast Majority of this MVP water 80%+ is Colorado River Water it too must be conserved. Lastly, East Valley AG has done nothing to meet their 2010 -2022 State Water Management Goals of a 14% reduction in Water from the Ground and The Colorado River Water. CVWD AG is using more than 310,000AF of ground and canal water yearly. a 14% reduction will save 43, 400 AF a Year. If they practiced Israeli and Australian Agricultural Water Conservation they could save 75,000AF. BUT RIGHT NOW, AG SAVES NOTHING BECAUSE THEY CONSIDER IT "FREE AND / OR CHEAP" until the leaders of Coachella Valley Demand CVWD look at the entire Valley's Public Interest and not the AG Board Members, John Powell, Anthony Bianco and Peter Nelson. This water will never be saved to provide resilience for the Coachella Valley's Future. The Savings from 124 Coachella Valley Golf Courses going "links Style" will be in excess of 20,000+AF. Adding in stopping the Lagoons and SURFPARKS will save the Valley another 15,000+AF AG Savings = 43,400AF Golf Savings=20,000AF+ Surf&Lagoon = 15,000+ HOA's = 10,000+ Water conserved could easily reach 88,000AF+ Per Year. It is more than possible to exceed 100,000AF + per year in conserved water. THIS 88,000AF COULD IMMEDIATELY GO INTO THE WHITEWATER REPLENISHMENT PONDS AND MAKE UP FOR THE 0- 5% SWP ALLOCATIONS CVWD IS RECEIVING. WITH LEVEL 2 AND MORE COLORADO RIVER CUTBACKS FORECASTED THE SOONER THIS CONSERVATION STARTS THE SOONER COACHELLA VALLEY'S AQUIFER CAN MAXIMIZE THE VALLEY'S WATER SECURITY / RESILIENCE GOING FORWARD. 2 504 MAKE NO MISTAKES.... YOU CAN NO LONGER DO BUSINESS AS USUAL IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY. YOU MUST REQUIRE CVWD TO REPRESENT ALL 300,000+ RESIDENTS AND NOT 3 BOARD MEMBERS + A SMALL HANDFUL OF MULTI -MILLIONAIRE FARMENTS. California bans watering "non-functional" grass in some areas, strengthening drought rules The California water board is proposing a ban on watering `non-functional' grass in some areas. Above, water droplets on grass from a sprinkler in Pasadena. (Francine Orr/Los Angeles Times) 505 BY IAN JAMESSTAFF WRITER MAY 24, 2022 3:39 PM PT California's top water regulators adopted emergency drought rules Tuesday that scale up conservation requirements for water suppliers throughout the state and prohibit watering grass that is purely decorative at businesses and in common areas of subdivisions and homeowners associations. The regulations outlaw the use of potable water for irrigating "non-functional" grass at commercial, industrial and institutional properties. The ban doesn't apply to yards at individual homes. There are exemptions for sports fields, grassy areas where people gather, and for watering to keep trees healthy. The State Water Resources Control Board voted to adopt the emergency drought regulations following an executive order by Gov. Gavin Newsom. The measures also require local water suppliers statewide to activate "Level 2" of their local contingency plans to prepare for a shortage of up to 20%. "We need to activate Californians and really lean into the conservation that we're needing to see," said Joaquin Esquivel, chair of the state water board. wimigingimiii The regulations require each urban water supplier to submit an annual water supply and demand assessment. Each agency that has filed a shortage contingency plan should take steps to reduce water use to prepare for a shortage of between 10% and 20%. Water agencies that haven't yet turned in a contingency plan to the state are required to take similar steps, including having a public information campaign focused on conservation and enforcing a rule limiting outdoor watering to two days a week, with limited hours before 10 a.m. or after 6 p.m. The regulations define "non-functional" turf as grass that is "solely ornamental" and not regularly used for recreational purposes or community events. "Any part of the golf course that is being used for the game of golf, such as the greens and the fairways, are functional," said Edward Ortiz, a spokesperson for the state water board. "However, water agencies and golf courses need to evaluate whether other turf on a golf course property is functional or not." 506 Areas that are irrigated with recycled wastewater aren't subject to the grass -watering ban. 507 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:05 AM To: Tania Flores Subject: Fw: The wave Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: MICHAEL ROSENFELD Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:14 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: The wave ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I attended the planning commission meeting on April 26. There were s0000 many good presentations given that showed why the wave should not be approved. However, even though this meeting occurred and all of the commissioners sat through it and appeared to listen, they obviously did not HEAR a thing because they still advised the city council to approve the project! REALLY!? I'm hoping the city council has more integrity and the members are able to see a larger picture. Judy carey. 38 year resident of LQ Sent from my iPad 1: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 16:58:58 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:52:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Trevor Schultz To: levans@laquintaca.gov, rradi@laquintaca.gov, kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov, jpena@laquintaca.gov, ssanchez@laquintaca.gov, jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov, ncriste@laquintaca.gov, dcastro@laquintaca.gov I support Coral Mountain as someone who comes to la Quinta all the time to visit friends in surrounding communities. 50(j)age 1 of 1 Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 8:41 AM To: Consulting Planner; Tania Flores Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Forwarding for the record. Thank you. IMoil IRadeva,'i': Oilt^ly, "J . ( wig I9 CIIIIIIe, Il hiu ill"quo), III a Qildnta, CA 9225 MRadeva(�Olaquintaca.gov ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Brett Smit Date: Fri, May 6, 2022 at 8:43 AM Subject: Coral Mountain Resort To: <imcmillen@laguintaca.gov>, <cityclerkmail@laquintaca.gov> Good Morning: I am a full-time resident and retired teacher in Palm Springs. I am absolutely appalled that the city of La Quinta has approved of the Coral Mountain Resort. Coral Mountain Resort is a $200 million master -planned resort community proposed by CM Wave Development LLC that includes a private -use, 16.6-acre wave basin which has been the source of opposition from residents living in neighboring communities including Trilogy and Andalusia. Concerns about the potential for increased traffic, noise and lighting from the wave basin also have been voiced by opponents. California declares unprecedented water restrictions amid drought Residents hQ -ve .Yf?en tvarned to scale do .7n f eir water usage this surnmer, as critical shortages looin. 510 Officials worry Southern California won't have enough water to get through summer without unprecedented cuts. These are just a few of the headlines in regards to the severity of our drought! To build yet another (PRIVATE) wave park, joined with a massive Hockey Arena, and a Disney development that again focuses on an artificial lake is beyond irresponsible! Has it truly boiled down to the almighty dollar? Please explain how you can ignore the science and data and allow for such a wasteful amount of our precious water supply? When we are no longer allowed to water our yards, the parks, the medians, the schools, what do we do then? Because the wealthy "need" a private surf park, and they can use water that is needed to grow crops, water landscaping, and keep us alive in this HOT desert environment, I will be forced to pay huge increases for what I need, until the supply runs out? Then what? Who will serve these entitled individuals? NO ONE will be able to afford to live here, and quite frankly, who will want to? This decision shows greed at its worst and reflects the very selfish motives of the La Quinta City Council. I guess the future environment for our kids and what they will inherit has no concern for this group of individuals. Brett Smith Palm Springs, CA 511 Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2022 3:59 PM To: Brett Smith; City Clerk Mail; Jon McMillen Cc: Consulting Planner; Tania Flores Subject: Smith, Beth: California is in a water crisis, yet usage is way up. Officials are focused on the wrong problem, advocates say Good afternoon Ms. Smith, your written public comments provided via the email below and dated 5/15/2022 have been received and will be included in the public record for this project. Thank you. IMloinlilka IR ev �''' i '"I (� " i ����;�,�� u,.. i of III � �nuunt � � u� 95 IIill ;fIppIIIIe I a'�In'llIIIIIco�, III a a'.i,u WIIII IIIt , � �iI 92253 I �.::��: � , . c.,�N ....i..... ^ MRadeva(&Iaquintaca.g0v From: Brett Smith Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2022 6:47 AM To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov> Subject: California is in a water crisis, yet usage is way up. Officials are focused on the wrong problem, advocates say EXTERNAL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. How can you possibly justify more outdoor lakes and surf pools? We will all SUFFER major consequences! This is criminal! California is in a water crisis, yet usage is way up. Officials are focused on the wrong problem, advocates say https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/15/us/california-water-usage-increase-drought-climate/index.html i 512 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 11:10 AM To: James Sprague; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Sprague, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: James Sprague Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:48 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support EXTEMYAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To whom it may concern, I'm writing in support of the Coral Mountain Wave Project being considered by the City Council this week. My family has a house in the PGA West community just down the street from the proposed project. While we live in Los Angeles, we are in the area regularly during peak season to golf and enjoy the amenities of the town of La Quinta. Our family believes that the wave project would offer an opportunity for us to increase our visits during the peak and summer season to enjoy the wave pool. Further, we have extended friends and family that are aware of the project and will consider buying in La Quinta if the project moves forward. The increase in residents and visitors seems to benefit both the City of La Quinta, the home owners and values, as well as those that would travel to visit. In addition to the community benefits, I believe this project with be the first of its kind, which in itself is amazing. It's a very exciting time to be a part of La Quinta. I hope the City moves forward with the approval. Please accept this note as an endorsement of the project. Sincerely, James Sprague 513 Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 14:05:13 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: "Coral Mountain Resort DEIR" Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:43:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov To provide comments in response to this notice (please include "Coral Mountain Resort DEIR" in the subject line) in writing, by August 6, 2021, to: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253, or �Qns Please include your name, address, and other contact information in your response. Hi Nicole, Would it help if the water used in this and other water surf parks in Palm Springs was not local water, but was surplus water from areas of potential flooding? I've been proposing for years that spring flooding in the Midwest and eastern parts of the US could be reduced/mitigated by hauling away surplus snow before it melts and causes flooding. One good source for collecting some of this surplus is snow plowed from large expanse parking lots. As it is plowed and scooped it can be easily deposited into reusable containers similar in size and shape to household plastic trash bins. Each time those bins are filled they could be loaded onto freight trucks destined for the west coast. On their way through Palm Springs those containers, or the water in those containers, could be dropped off at the water parks (and in lakes and reservoirs throughout California) and stored in the containers until needed in the surf park pools. After the containers are emptied, they could be stacked and a stack of empties loaded back onto trucks returning with new freight from the coast and shipped back to the heavy snow accumulation areas to be refilled again, over and over. Many trucks have unfilled capacity that would allow enough space for at least a few of these containers to be added to their existing loads. Some trucks might not always have a load at all when returning to the west coast and could accommodate over 100 such containers. For more details on this proposal feel free to contact me. I'd be happy to provide more specifics on how this could help bring more new water supplies into California and Arizona, and all states in the west, as well as mitigate spring flooding in the midwest and eastern states, provide more revenue for truckers, and reduce parking lot damage caused by piles of ice created by snow plowed from those lots that participate. Thank you for reading and sharing. Joe Tomlinson 514Page 1 of 1 Tania Flores From: Monika Radeva Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2022 6:58 PM To: Cher Van Wagenen Cc: City Clerk Mail; John Pena; Consulting Planner; Tania Flores; Cheri Flores Subject: Van Wagenen, Cher - Newsom's Statement re Water Conservation Good afternoon, The City is in receipt of the written comments submitted via the emails below. The comments will be included in the public record for the Coral Mountain Resort project. Thank you. IMoinlilka IRadeva, CA� ����:. lii °'����'" O e ir.k ::. �� 84195 CzflHIe a iiµn Ip. ii o II a ii' ...IIIb C ..„., MRadevaC@laquintaca.gov From: Cher Van Wagenen Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 10:34 AM To: John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Re: Newsom's Statement re Water Conservation EXTERNAL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. John Thank you for your response to my email regarding Gov. Newsom's plea to reduce water usage to a 15% reduction. As you should know, within the week, Gov. Newsom is prepared to mandate conservation to far more stringent requirements to all California residents and businesses. Since Coral Mountain Wave Project uses potable water, using 80 million gallons to fill the lagoon, but has not included the 2022 stats of evaporation, the project is obscene to consider in this multi year drought. Additionally, when East Coachella Valley residents (Oasis, Thermal, North Shore, etc.) have arsenic tainted ground water, using potable water for "the largest Wave/Surf Project" in the world is unconscionable. I see few reports on the electrical draw of the Coral Mountain project. Logistically, with the light standards and electrical energy to generate the waves it must consume enormous electricity.. Over the last years, the Coachella Valley has suffered repeated brown outs and complete electrical outages. Coral Mountain Wave Project will drain our already taxed electric grid. I beg you to reconsider this project, do not fall prey to the big moneyed developers, who's only interest is a landslide dollar return at the detriment of the future of La Quinta and the Coachella Valley at large. The Aquifer reserve may not survive years of the Coral Mountain water waste. Most emphatically, Jeff Van Wagenen 515 626-255-4487 Cher Vain Wageneni On Many 25,2.022, at 1-17 PM,John Pena <Jpenaglaquintaca.gov wrote,: Thank you fortaking the time to express your views on the Coral Mountain project. although COUnCif members cannot pre-cletermine how we will vote on a, project, I can, assure you that as a lifelong desert resident I take very seriously the effects of any project that comes before the unity counibl, it's impact on our natural resources, the environment, traffic, and benefits to the commUnity. As with all iterns that come before the councit II will consider ail the information presented by all Interested parties for this project. Also, for fUtUre reference, please feel free to send or copy the City Clerk's Office so that your communications can conveniently be included as part of the record for correspondence received in connection with this project, which can be sent to: QtvCierkMaiU@ laquintaca.gov. Thank you again for reaching out to share your concerns. John Pe,n-a I Member of the City Council Cit-V of La Qu i nta 78-495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA, 92253 Ph. 760.7773030, From: Cher Van, Wagerien Sent: Tuesday, May 24,,2022 7:38 AM To: Linda Evans <Levan s(M l,a,qu rn ta ca.g'qv>; Robert Radl <Rradi &laquintacA.A >J,athleen Fitzpatrick <,kfitzpatrilckPlauuintaca,.eov>; John Pena <iPena0aquintaca,gov>; Steve 5anchez Subject: Newsorn's Statement re Waiter Conservation 516 t:X°t"t:RNAL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Gov. Gavin Newsom renewed his calls for strict water conservation measures across California in a meeting on Monday, May 23, with the state's largest urban water suppliers — warning that if local efforts don't save enough water, the state will have to enact mandatory restrictions. "Every water agency across the state needs to take more aggressive actions to communicate about the drought emergency and implement conservation measures," Newsom said. "Californians made significant changes since the last drought but we have seen an uptick in water use, especially as we enter the summer months. We all have to be more thoughtful about how to make every drop count." Newsom will meet with the agencies again in two months to get an update on conservation efforts. He also asked them to submit water use data more frequently and increase transparency so the state can more accurately measure whether it is meeting its conservation goals. The State Water Resources Control Board is scheduled to vote Tuesday on a statewide ban on watering non-functional turf at commercial, industrial and institutional locations. The board will also consider requiring local agencies to implement water use restrictions. Local water agency restrictions currently only cover about half of California's population. The city of Los Angeles will enact two-day outdoor watering restrictions starting on June 1, down from the current three, with watering permitted at odd -numbered street addresses on Mondays and Fridays, and at even -numbered addresses on Thursdays and Sundays. On Friday, Mayor Eric Garcetti met with California Natural Resources Agency Secretary Wade Crowfoot to highlight the need to protect the region's trees, even with water restrictions, amid the historic drought. Trees can capture stormwater, improve water quality and reduce flood risk, along with helping air quality and the impacts of heat waves. Once the watering restrictions take effect in Los Angeles, outdoor watering with sprinklers will be limited to eight minutes per station. Sprinklers with water -conserving nozzles will be limited 517 to 15 minutes per station, AV watering will have to be done in the evening or early morning, with no watering permitted outdoors, between S a.m. and 4 p.m. The tw,o-day watering restrictions wfli be enforced by the Conservation IRespornse Unit, which will focus on areas that are using the most water,, according to DWP General Manager and Chief Engineer Miarty Adams,, He said when the restrictions were announced that the department will re -assign employees to ensure co verage% in all areas of the city, and might bring on additional personnel during the suimmer. RELATED ARTICLES a Riverside County fire off! dals,ban outdoor biurn in gamidl megladlyought, early wildfire season ■ Gov. News*rn visits Carson to discuss, drought respoinse, including Iproposwed wastewatar plant a California drought: March water usage the worst so far, up 19% a What rainy, season? Southern California sees little relief on drought a Arnerica"s love affalir with the lawn isgetting ni Garcetti also said the water restrict[ons' anforcernent wilill begin with education for people who are violating the ordinance, bUt it Will escalate with fines and tickets, if needed. The cily's policy is less stridthan some parts of L.A. Cbuinty, which will be limited to cne-day per week watering, According to, Newsom's office, banning wateringof decorative lawns would save between 1515,0100acre-feet and ,000 acre, -feet per year, the equivalent of water usQd by 7,90,000 households in a year. The governor's office also urged people to shower for only five minutes or less, stop taking baths, only wash full loads of clothes and use a broorn instead of a hose to clean outdoor areas, S New5wom 134delim-­; ■News'lips, cogitact UIS a Repor L an Euot Cher Vain Wagenen 518 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 4:54 PM To: Larry Wares; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc: Tania Flores Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Wares, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Larry Wares Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 3:41 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support EXTEMYAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. My name is Larry Wares. My wife and I (Cyndi) raised 5 amazing children in the Southern California area. We just had our 141" grandchild this morning! We are a family that embraces the concept of spending active time together doing things that challenges us. Our vacations and free time almost always included activities like dirt bike riding, surfing, snowboarding, mountain biking, etc. While other kids were at parties on the weekends, our kids were almost always with mom, dad and siblings expanding and enhancing their mental and athletic skills. Our children now have endless memories spending quality time with their family. As parents, we always hoped our family time with them would provide a balance that helped them navigate the challenges they would face with their own little family. Our hopes have been realized. Four of our five children now have their own families, and they all seem to be replicating the same process with their children. This definitely keeps nana and papa motivated to stay fit! Why am I telling you this story? Our family surf trips often included places like Tahiti, Mexico, Hawaii, Indonesia and many other locations out of the USA to find perfect waves. Our family also golfs. We spend quite a bit of time in the desert playing golf at some of the nicest resorts in town with other friends. We also come to the desert to ride motorcycles in the cooler season. Being able to come to La Quinta to a resort like Coral Mountain Wave Park to surf perfect warm waves would be a dream -come -true for the Wares family, and for hundreds of other families who do what the we do. 519 I have surfed at the Kelly Slater Ranch in Lamore a few times. I can tell you that this concept is designed to create memories of a lifetime for families like ours. This is not a spring break concept — it's a family concept. Everything about the venue is family -oriented. We have several friends that reside at the neighboring Andalusia community. I just played golf with them last week. They had the impression that this was going to be a loud spring break/surfer/party place. After I explained the "real" concept, they had a completely different mindset. I showed them photos of the Lamore location. I showed them videos of the machine that created the waves. They said "I don't hear the motors running". After learning the mechanism is nearly silent, they were surprised. After learning this is not a spring break place, they were excited about the development. None of the people I played golf with last week surf, but after better understanding how incredible it would be to bring Tahiti, Indonesia and Hawaii waves to the desert would be, they finally "got it". I told them it like bringing the wonder of Ireland golf to the deserts of California. You don't have to travel for days to golf perfection. We want all of you to know that the Wares family, and many others like us, are routing for this dream vacation project approval. Sincerely; Larry Wares Principal RM Dalton Corporation (949) 300-0039 C www.rmdalton.com PLEASE UPDATE YOUR RECORDS - WE HAVE MOVED. Our new office location / mailing address is: 952 MacArthur Blvd. Bonita 320 2 520 Frorn: (.7inristilfing pfannipr Sent Wednesday, June 1,, 2022,225 PIVI To: Tania Flores Subject Fars. SI R(ING SUPPORF foi ( of al Mouiiifain Wave Piiojecll Nicole Saiuviat Criste Consulting Planner City of Lai Quint'a From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquiintaca.gov> Sent. Wed20 inesday, June 1,2022 2PM ,TO i Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatri�ck@,IaqLtiln(ta4ca.gov>; John Pena ejp,,ena@laquintaca.gow-; Steve Sanchez <ssainchez@l@quiirtaca,gov>, Jon McMillen <jnncmflIen@Wquintaca,gov>, Danny Castro <dcastrc@Iaquintaca.go,v> Subject: ReTRONG SUPPORT for, Coral Mountain Wave Project Mr,., We�iss�, Reseniding as my previous email was sent in error. Thank you for your cornments. They will be provided to the City Councill when they consider the application at hearing. Nicolle Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La QLfinta From: Sent Wednesday, June 1, 2022 135 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquint�aca,gov>; Robert Raid! <RradI,@laquintaca,.gov>;, Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzp,atrick@iaquintaca.gc)v>,, John Pana <jpena@laquintaca.gov>,- Steve Sanchez <ss,ainchiaz@iaiquiiiitaca,.c)v>, Jon McMillen <jmcmdl1an@laq uIntaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <COnS,LiltiingPlanner@'Iaqluinit�aca.gov>,' Danny Castro <dcas,trc @I aq u i ntac agov> Subject: STRONG SUPPORT for Coral Mountarn Wave Project EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgernent and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding t�o requests for information, " City Council Mernibers, My name is Jason, We,iss and 11 ama resi.dant of La Quinta , l am 43 years old and grew up, in Los Angeles, close enough to be able to spend my holidays and ether vacations in La Quinita as a kid, which are some of my fondest mernoriies. I am nov,(very lucky to be, able to call this city my permanie,nt home. La Quinta is and wil continue to, be one of the most speciial places on planet earth, and I am excited to see all of the new budding as well as the transition to a younger generation now speniding significant time here. 521 La Quinta is becoming much more than a place for retirees to play golf. I knew it was only a matter of time before something like the Coral Mountain project would happen, and I couldn't be more excited for this to come to fruition. I am in the process of building a home in The Quarry, which is right next door to this project. I am extremely confident that this development as a whole, with the hotel and all of the amenities, will be a very big draw for people from all over the world and I also believe that it will drive real estate values up even higher than where they are now. I am a HUGE SUPPORTER of this project and feel that change and evolution are very important for a community and a city like La Quinta. Coral Mountain is going to be the first of its kind and I am proud that La Quinta will be the home of such an amazing forward thinking master planned community. Please approve this project and lets show the world what careful planning and forward thinking looks like. Thank you - Jason Weiss Property Advisory Refined TheLuxuryDesert.com JasonAWeiss.com 310-972-8877 522 Tania Flores From: Consulting Planner Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 8:51 AM To: Kathy Weiss Cc: Linda Evans ; Robert Radi; Dann Castro- Kathleen Fitz atrick- John Pena; Robert Radi; Steve Sanchez; Planning WebMail; Tania Flores; Subject: Re: Wave Park Legal Notice Press Release Ms. Weiss, Thank you for your comments. They will be included in the materials provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Kathy Weiss Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 10:44 PM Cc: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov>; Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov>; Subject: Wave Park Legal Notice Press Release EXTIFRIYAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. FYI - Sending PR to you in case you were not aware. Please pass on to your peers, LQ Planning Commission members, and the LaQuinta Community. It would be redundant to ask you if you really want another SilverRock. Thank you, Kathy Weiss btt.p .o Lhga .h irirt.com 2022 0 aimeiriican ave maclhiines sues wsll owned surf ranch .floriida and others .oYer:..n�t ..::allm beach florda.wave ooll.... ir .iU ._i:o" / Kathy D. Weiss 000"� Summer Residence , Carbondale, CO 81623 523 Winter Residence. , La Quinta, CA 92253 524 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2021020310) FOR THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT PROJECT; ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CASE NUMBERS: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0010 APPLICANT: CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on June 7, 2022, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2019-0010 and its Environmental Impact Report (EIR, SCH #2021020310), as mandated by State law for the Coral Mountain Resort Project consisting of a master planned community on 386 acres of a 929 acre area located south of Avenue 58, north of Avenue 60, and east and west of Madison Street, more particularly described as: Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 764-200-076, 764-210-007, 764-210-028, 764-210-029, 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766-070-014, 766-080-001,766-080-002,766- 080-004 & 766-080-005 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 27, 2022, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2022-010 to recommend the City Council certify Environmental Assessment 2019-0010 at a duly noticed Public Hearing on April 26, 2022, following public hearings held on March 22, and April 12; and 525 DRAFT City Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Environmental Assessment 2019-0010 Environmental Impact Report SCH #2021020310 Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"), and Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), the City of La Quinta (""City") is the Lead Agency for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Notice of Preparation (""NOP") of a Draft EIR for the Coral Mountain Resort on or about February 17, 2021, and it was transmitted to the State Clearinghouse, local and regional agencies, and posted at the Riverside County Clerk's office for a 30-day comment period where comments and participation were sought from the public and all interested and affected groups and agencies; and WHEREAS, on or about June 20, 2021, the City published a Notice of Availability (""NOA") which initiated a 45-day public review and comment period of the Draft EIR for the Proposed Project and released the Draft EIR for public review and comment between June 22 and August 6, 2021; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15086, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and other interested parties during the 45-day public review and comment period and received 98 comments; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared a Final EIR, consisting of the comments received during the public review and comment period on the Draft EIR, written responses to those comments, revisions to the Draft EIR and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. For the purposes of this Resolution, the "EIR" shall refer to the Draft EIR, as revised by the Final EIR, together with the other sections of the Final EIR; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts identified in the EIR that the Lead Agency finds are of no impact or constitute a less than significant impact and do not require mitigation are described in Sections IV and V of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts identified in the EIR as potentially significant but which the Lead Agency finds can be mitigated to a less than significant level through the incorporation of feasible Mitigation Measures identified in the EIR are described in Section III of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts identified in the EIR as potentially significant but which the Lead Agency finds cannot be mitigated to 526 DRAFT City Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Environmental Assessment 2019-0010 Environmental Impact Report SCH #2021020310 Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 3 of 5 a less than significant level, despite the imposition of feasible Mitigation Measures identified in the EIR are described in Section II of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, alternatives to the Proposed Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Section VI of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program setting forth the mitigation measures to which the Lead Agency shall bind itself in connection with the Proposed Project, is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the Lead Agency has heard, been presented with, reviewed and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, including the EIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings; and WHEREAS, the EIR reflects tl Council and is deemed adequate for merits of the Proposed Project; and e independent judgment of the City purposes of making decisions on the WHEREAS, the Lead Agency has not received any comments or additional information that constituted substantial new information requiring recirculation under Public Resources Code Section 21092.1 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of CEQA, and the State CEQA Guidelines, have been satisfied by the City in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findingsof the City Council. 527 DRAFT City Council Resolution No. 2022 - XXX Environmental Assessment 2019-0010 Environmental Impact Report SCH #2021020310 Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 4 of 5 SECTION 2. That the City Council does adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Section VII of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herewith by this reference. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B. Implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby made a condition of approval of the Project. In the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program shall control. SECTION 4. The City Council finds that it has been presented with the EIR, which it has reviewed and considered, and further finds that the EIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines and that the EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. The City Council declares that no evidence of new significant impacts as defined by the State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5 have been received by the City Council after circulation of the Draft EIR which would require recirculation. Therefore, the City Council hereby certifies the EIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings. SECTION 5. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located at La Quinta City Hall, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta or designee. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2). PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on June 7, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: M-. DRAFT City Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Environmental Assessment 2019-0010 Environmental Impact Report SCH #2021020310 Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 5 of 5 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 6TAt EXHIBIT A CEQA FINDINGS and STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA for the CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT PROJECT 530 FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) TABLE OF CONTENTS I . INTRODUCTION...................................................................... 1 ProjectDescription........................................................................................4 Project Components.......................................................................................6 ProjectConstruction.......................................................................................7 Project Implementation..................................................................................7 ResponsibleAgencies....................................................................................8 ProjectObjectives..........................................................................................8 II. FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS......................................................................9 Aesthetics.............................................................................................................9 Effects on scenic vistas..................................................................................9 Greenhouse Gas Emissions..................................................................................I I GHG Emissions that may Significantly Impact the Environment .................I I III. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS WHICH ARE AVOIDED OR MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL..............................................................................16 Aesthetics.............................................................................................................17 Impact a Scenic Resources within a State Scenic Highway Corridor ...........17 Lightand Glare..............................................................................................19 AirQuality...........................................................................................................21 Cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant..................21 Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations ...............24 BiologicalResources...........................................................................................27 Candidate, sensitive or special status species and Riparian habitat...............27 Movement of wildlife....................................................................................31 Consistency with local policies and applicable habitat conservation plan ....34 CulturalResources...............................................................................................34 Impacts to Historical Resources.....................................................................34 Impacts to Archaeological Resources............................................................36 Impacts to human remains.............................................................................38 i 531 Geologyand Soils................................................................................................39 Expose People or Structures to Effects Involving Seismic -Related Ground Failure, including Liquefaction .............................39 Located on an Unstable Geologic Unit or Expansive Soil ............................41 Impacts to a Unique Paleontological Resource, Site or Unique Geologic Feature................................................................................44 Noise....................................................................................................................45 Consistency with Established Noise Standards/Increase in Ambient Noise Levels........................................................................45 Transportation......................................................................................................49 Consistency with an Applicable Plan or Policy Addressing the Circulation System.............................................................................49 Effect of a Geometric Design Features..........................................................54 Emergency Access.........................................................................................55 Tribal Cultural Resources....................................................................................56 Impacts to Significant Tribal Cultural Resources..........................................56 IV. FINDINGS REGARDING IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT..............................................................................................61 Aesthetics.............................................................................................................61 Effects to the Visual Character or Quality of the Site..................................61 AirQuality...........................................................................................................62 Consistency with implementation of applicable air quality plans andstandards...........................................................................................62 Create objectionable odors.............................................................................63 Energy..................................................................................................................64 Consumption of Energy Resources................................................................64 Consistency with a State or Local Plan for Renewable Energy or EnergyEfficiency....................................................................................64 Geologyand Soils................................................................................................65 Effects Involving Strong Seismic Shaking/Landslides.................................65 Soil Erosion or Loss of Topsoil....................................................................66 Greenhouse Gas Emissions..................................................................................66 Consistency with Applicable Plan, Policy or Regulation .............................66 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.......................................................................67 Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Material, Including Accidental Release...................................................................................................67 11 532 Effect on an Emergency Response Plan........................................................67 Riskof Wildfires............................................................................................68 Other Potential Hazards........................................................................................... 68 Hydrology and Water Quality..............................................................................69 Compliance with Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements...........................................................................................69 Effect on of Groundwater Supplies or Interference with Groundwater Recharge..................................................................................................69 Potential Impacts from Alteration of Existing Drainage Patters ...................70 Inundation by Flooding, Seiche, Tsunami or Mudflow.................................70 Consistency with Water Quality Control Plan or Sustainable Groundwater ManagementPlan.....................................................................................70 Land Use Consistency with Any Land Use Plan, Policy or Regulation ........................74 Noise....................................................................................................................75 Generation of Ground Borne Vibration.........................................................75 PublicServices.....................................................................................................76 Transportation......................................................................................................77 Consistency with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)[VMT]................................................................................................77 Utilities and Service Systems...............................................................................79 Require or Result in Construction of New or Expanded Facilities for Water, Wastewater, Drainage or Utilities............................................................79 Sufficiency of Water Supplies.......................................................................80 Wastewater Treatment System Capacity.......................................................80 Generate Excess Solid Waste.........................................................................81 Comply with Statues and Regulations Related to Solid Waste .....................81 V. FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTDS HAVING NO IMPACT.....................................................................................................87 Biological Resources...........................................................................................87 Federally protected wetlands........................................................................87 Geologyand Soils................................................................................................87 Effects Involving Rupture from Known Fault..............................................87 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.......................................................................87 Hazardous Materials within 1/4 mile of a school...........................................87 Sites with Known Hazardous Materials Pursuant to Government CodeSection 65962.5.........................................................................87 iii 533 Effects Having No Impact and Not Analyzed Further in Draft EIR....................88 VI. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVE ANALYZED THE DIER AND REJECTED..................................................................................................88 Alternative 1: No Project/No Build.....................................................................89 Alternative 2: No Project/Existing Entitlements..................................................90 Alternative 3: Reduced Density Alternative........................................................91 Alternative 4: The Golf/Resort Hotel Alternative...............................................91 Alternative 5: The Lake Amenity/No Hotel Alternative.....................................92 Additional Findings Regarding the Environmentally Superior Alternative ........93 VIL STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS .............................94 VIII. FINDINGS REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF FINAL EIR ..................98 IV 534 Final EIR SCH No. 2021020310 GPA 2019-0002, ZC 2019-0004, SP 2019-003, SP 2020-0002, TTM 2019-0005, SDP 2021- 0001, DA 2021-0002 The City of La Quinta (City) has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Coral Mountain Resort (Project) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq. as amended). I. INTRODUCTION The project proposes several applications allowing for the development of a master planned community with a hotel, recreational surf wave facility, as well as planned residential neighborhoods and commercial and recreational uses. The ultimate build -out of the approximately 386-acre Specific Plan area includes up to 600 residential units, a resort hotel with up to 150 keys and complementary resort uses and amenities, a 16.62-acre recreational surf facility, 57,000 square feet of tourist commercial uses, 60,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial uses, and additional open space and recreational uses totaling 23.6 acres. The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 2019-0002), Zone Change (ZC 2019-0004), Specific Plan (SP 2020-0002), a Specific Plan Amendment to SP 03- 067, Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2019-0005), Site Development Permit (SDP 2021-0001), and Development Agreement (DA 2021-0002), as a part of the entitlement process. The City distributed a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to prepare a Draft EIR for a 30-day comment period between February 17, 2021 and March 19, 2021. The NOP review period was extended until April 2, 2021 in order to include the Development Agreement in the project description pursuant to Article 2.5 of Chapter 4, Division 1, Title 7 of the State California Government Code. The comment period was extended to allow public comments until April 2, 2021. The NOP included an evaluation of the environmental topics that will and will not be analyzed within the Draft EIR. The evaluation was prepared using Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form, in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The NOP was sent to the State Clearinghouse and to all responsible and trustee agencies, and to interested parties. Issues raised by agencies and the public in response to the NOP were considered in the preparation of the Draft EIR. The NOP and comments received are contained in Appendix A of the EIR. Based on the preliminary review conducted by the City and responses to the NOP, the City found that the Project could have potentially significant environmental effects, including effects on the following: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use, Noise, Public Services, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Utilities and Service Systems. In accordance with CEQA, the City determined the Project could have potentially significant impacts and determined that an environmental impact report should be prepared. 1 535 The Draft EIR was prepared and circulated for a 45-day public review period from June 22, 2021 to August 6, 2021. The Final EIR for the Project consists of the Draft EIR, revisions to the Draft EIR, a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR, comments received on the Draft EIR, and responses to those comments. A copy of the Final EIR was made available for public review and provided to all parties commenting on the Draft EIR at least 10 days prior to certification. The Final EIR evaluated potential effects for the following environmental areas: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire. The Final EIR identified potentially significant environmental effects related to Aesthetics (scenic vistas, scenic resources, visual character, light/glare), Air Quality (construction -source and operational -source emissions), Biological Resources (sensitive species, sensitive habitat); Cultural Resources (historical resources, known and unknown cultural resources during project excavation); Geology and Soils (seismic -related ground failure, soil erosion, destruction of unique resources), Greenhouse Gas Emissions (generation of GHG emissions and conflicts with applicable plans), Noise (temporary construction noise and ground borne vibration, operational and traffic noise); Transportation (VMT, plan consistency, construction traffic, impacts related to special events); and Tribal Cultural Resources (known and unknown tribal cultural resources). The Final EIR determined that the potentially significant environmental impacts have been reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of the mitigation measures and adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program designed to ensure compliance with mitigation measures throughout implementation of the project, with the exception of the significant and unavoidable impacts discussed in Section III below (scenic vistas and GHG emissions). The Final EIR identified no impact or less than significant impacts related to Agriculture and Forest Resources, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Recreation, and Wildfire. Public Resources Code Section 21081 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 require that the City of La Quinta, as lead agency for this project, prepare written findings for any identified significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings under CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines are: (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate, avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects on the environment. (2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 2 536 (3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3), the City finds that the project will have significant and unavoidable impacts to aesthetics (adverse effect on scenic vistas), and greenhouse gas emissions, even after all feasible mitigation measures recommended in the Final EIR are implemented. The City finds that for each of the significant effects identified in the Final EIR, other than the aesthetic and greenhouse gas emission impacts identified above, changes or alterations (project design features and mitigation measures) have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which will avoid or substantially lessen each of the significant environmental effects identified in the Final EIR. The significant effects (impacts) and mitigation measures are stated fully in the Final EIR. The rationale for this finding for each impact is discussed below. After consideration of an EIR, the lead agency may decide whether or how to approve or carry out the project. For purposes of CEQA and for the Findings set forth herein, the record of proceedings for the City' Findings and determinations consists of the following documents and testimony, at a minimum: • The City's General Plan, as amended, and all environmental documents relating thereto; • The Draft EIR for the Project, including all Appendices thereto and all supporting materials referenced therein; • The Final EIR for the Project, including all comments on the Draft EIR, all responses thereto, and all supporting materials referenced therein; • All testimony and written comments received at any public hearing relating to the Project, including the March 30, 2021 public scoping meeting, September 28, 2021 joint Planning Commission and City Council study session, the Planning Commission hearings on March 22, 2022, April 12, 2022, and April 26, 2022, and the City Council hearing on June 7, 2022; The groundwater management plan documents submitted to the City on April 23, 2022, which include (1) the Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan (2021), (2) the CVWD Water Supply Assessment Fact Sheet (updated March 22, 2022), (3) the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update — Compiled - Final (adopted December 2021), (4) Indio Subbasin Annual Report Workshop PowerPoint (March 17, 2022), and (5) Indio Subbasin Annual Report — Final (February 2022). All reports of the City relating to the Project, including reports submitted to the City by expert consultants, and all supporting materials referenced therein; 3 537 • These Findings made by the City and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") adopted by the City for the Project; • All final City Staff reports relating to the Draft EIR, the Final EIR and/or the Project; • All other public reports, documents, studies, memoranda, maps, or other planning documents relating to the Project, the Draft EIR or the Final EIR, prepared by the City, consultants to the County, or responsible or trustee agencies, or submitted to the City prior to the close of the City Council hearing on the Project; • All prior environmental impact reports and studies related to the Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan 03-067; and • All matters of common knowledge to the City, including but not limited to the City's policies, guidelines and regulations. The official custodian of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings is: City of La Quinta Planning Division 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: 760-777-7000 Hours: Monday — Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Copies of all these documents, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City's decision is based, are, and at all relevant times have been, available upon request at the offices of the City, the custodian for such documents. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project area encompasses 929 acres that are currently a part of the "Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan 03-067", which includes the area south of Avenue 58 and east and west of Madison Street. The area east of Madison Street encompasses the Andalusia Country Club property. The area west of Madison Street is currently vacant. Amendment V of Specific Plan 03- 067 is being processed to remove the area west of Madison Street from the Specific Plan area, thus, creating two separate and distinct communities, "Coral Mountain Resort", west of Madison Street, and "Andalusia Country Club", east of Madison Street. M 538 The applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements, which if approved, would allow for and govern the development of the project site: Specific Plan Amendment- The Specific Plan Amendment (Amendment V of Specific Plan 03-067) is being processed to remove the area west of Madison Street from the Specific Plan area, thus, creating two separate and distinct communities, "Coral Mountain Resort", west of Madison Street, and "Andalusia Country Club", east of Madison Street. The Specific Plan Amendment will result in only the deletion of the westerly 386 acres. No changes to land use designations, densities or intensities of uses, or development standards or guidelines are proposed for the lands east of Madison Street. It is expected that Andalusia will continue to build out under the requirements of the SPA. General Plan Amendment- A General Plan Amendment (GPA 2019-0002) will amend the current General Plan land use designations for the Specific Plan Area from General Commercial, Low Density Residential, and Open Space — Recreation to Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, and Open Space — Recreation. Zone Change- The proposed Zone Change (ZC 2019-0004) will revise the existing zoning of the Specific Plan Area from Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, and Golf Course, to Neighborhood Commercial (CN), Low Density Residential (RL), Parks and Recreation (PR), and Tourist Commercial (CT). Specific Plan- Approval of the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan (SP 2020-0002) will establish a new master plan governing the allowable land uses, design guidelines, and development standards for the 386-acre property west of Madison Street, to allow creation of a boutique resort and master -planned community. The project will result in a variety of land uses on the Specific Plan area's 386 acres. Low Density Residential land uses will occupy approximately 232.3 acres and result in a maximum of 496 dwelling units. Tourist Commercial land uses will include up to 104 dwelling units, 150 hotel rooms, and 57,000 square feet of private resort -serving commercial uses available to residents and hotel guests, on approximately 120.8 acres. Neighborhood commercial land uses will occupy approximately 7.7 acres, with up to 60,000 square feet of retail commercial uses available to the general public. Open Space Recreation land uses will occur on approximately 23.6 acres in the southwest portion of the site. Tentative Tract Map- The Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2019-0005) subdivides the property into smaller lots for development. The TTM will subdivide all of Planning Area III (PA III), and the western corner of PA II into lots suitable for the development of the uses permitted for these areas in the Specific Plan, and for ancillary facilities including streets. Future TTMs may be filed with each phase of development as necessary to implement the balance of the project. Site Development Permit- The Site Development Permit (SDP 2021-0001) is required by the City to establish the location, architectural design and landscape plan for the Wave Basin along with associated mechanical equipment and improvements (Planning Area III- 5 539 B). Future SDPs will be filed with each phase of development as necessary to implement the balance of the project. The SDP includes: • The Wave Basin site plan • Winch Plans and sections of the Wave Basin (the winches are located in the mechanical buildings and assist in mal-ing the waves) • Surf Lighting layout • Architecture Plans and elevations of the maintenance yard, maintenance building, water tank, water treatment building, north and south winch. • Photometric Plans for the lighting surrounding the Wave Basin • Landscape Architecture Plans for the proposed landscaped areas around the Wave Basin • Development Agreement- The Development Agreement (DA 2021-0002) would establish the responsibilities of the applicant and the City, including vesting the project approvals, establishing standards authorizing vacation rentals, and setting financial obligations of the development. PROJECT COMPONENTS The Project build out components include: • 600 Dwelling Units of varying types 0 496 single family attached and detached dwellings and affiliated amenities (Low Density Residential land use) • Low Density Residential product types may include estate compounds, single- family detached/attached units, alley loaded homes, and clustered products. 0 104 resort residential units (Tourist Commercial land use) • Resort residential product types may include single family detached units, townhomes, and stacked flats. 0 60,000 square feet of publicly accessible neighborhood commercial building space 0 150-key resort with customary resort amenities o The Resort Hotel will provide a hospitality component, with amenities such as a restaurant and bar, retail shop, meeting space, swimming pool, fitness center, spa and lodging. o Lodging options will provide a range of traditional hotel rooms, suites, and casitas. 57,000 square feet of resort -serving commercial and recreational building space o Residents and guests of the property will have exclusive use of resort commercial amenities. • The Wave Basin 16.62-acre artificial surf Wave Basin (approximately 12.5 acres of water surface area, plus decking and related improvements) o Residents and guests of the property will have exclusive use of the Wave Basin o Equipment and service space for the Wave Basin includes no 540 • Two approximately 6,000-square-foot winch areas, each having: • 1,900-square-foot winch buildings • 2,800-square-foot shade structures • 37,500-square-foot Service Yard, including: • 2,400- square- foot Maintenance Workshop • 2,400- square- foot Water Treatment building • 0.5-million-gallon (MG) Water Tank o The Specific Plan includes the potential occurrence of special events at this location involving attendance of up to 2,500 guests per day, for up to 4 days, and up to 4 events per year, subject to City approval of a temporary use permit. 0 26.5 acres of graded area, south of the Wave Basin o Providing unprogrammed gathering and staging space for temporary equipment such as portable toilets, shade structures, tenting for inclement weather, event parking and catering equipment, as well as parking. • Approximately 24 acres of natural open space for low -impact active and passive recreational activities. o Including hiking, biking, and ropes courses. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION According to the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, project construction will occur in eight (8) primary development areas with buildout anticipated to occur in three primary phases. Each primary development area may be broken into subphases in response to market conditions and consumer demand. Phased development will be accompanied by the orderly extension of circulation and parking facilities, public utilities, and infrastructure in accordance with the final conditions of approval for the project. The applicant proposes to commence construction of the Wave Basin first, due to longer construction timelines than the other uses within the Specific Plan. The Site Development Permit (SDP 2021-0001) for the Wave Basin described above is being processed concurrently with the initial entitlements. Following this entitlement and construction schedule, it is anticipated that the Wave Basin and other Tourist Commercial and Residential land uses will be completed and ready for occupancy at approximately the same time. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION Should the project be approved, implementation would include the following entitlement processes: Tentative Tract Map (TTM) — In addition to the TTM which is part of the initial entitlements, future TTMs are intended to implement the project and subdivide the property into smaller lots for development. TTMs may be filed with each phase of development as necessary. Each TTM will require review by the Planning Commission. 7 541 Site Development Permit (SDP): SDPs will be required by the City for final approval of landscape design, architectural design, and site plans for each phase of development. These may be processed concurrent with or subsequent to other entitlement approvals. Each SDP will require public hearings before the Planning Commission. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): Uses that require a CUP shall be processed in accordance with Section 9.210.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Temporary Use Permit (TUP): TUPs are required by the City to accommodate special, unique, or limited duration activities that might otherwise be outside the provisions of normal zoning. Temporary uses are anticipated and allowed by the Specific Plan, subject to the City's TUP requirements set forth in Section 9.210.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. TUPs are reviewed administratively by the Design and Development Director and do not require a public hearing. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES The following are anticipated responsible agencies which may rely on the Final EIR for their discretionary approvals required to implement the project: Imperial Irrigation District Approval or certification related to any other applicable general order, rule, or regulation concerning utility modification, conveyance, or delivery. Coachella Valley Water District Review and approval of the design and plans for the project's domestic water and wastewater systems. Colorado Regional Water Quality Control Board (Region 7) Approval may include but is not limited to: (1) General Construction Stormwater Permit; (2) Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan; and (3) Submittal of a Recycled Water Report for the use of recycled water as a dust control measure for construction. Additionally, approval of a Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act may be required to verify compliance with water quality requirements (waste discharge and water quality). PROJECT OBJECTIVES The project has identified the following objectives: • To implement a plan that recognizes and responds to the natural and aesthetic character of the property. • To create a private resort community with a variety of interrelated and mutually supportive commercial and recreational land uses that will also generate transient occupancy and sales tax revenues in order to enhance the City's economic base and long-term financial stability. • To promote walkability and non -motorized connectivity as an integral part of the project design, including: (1) establishing residential neighborhoods that are linked through multi- 542 use trails that connect neighborhoods throughout the project; and (2) providing "walk streets" in the Resort area to provide internal connection between facilities within the Resort and the Wave Basin. • To maintain the overall density previously included for this property in the Andalusia Specific Plan, while establishing a density hierarchy that situates the highest density development within the Resort and gradually reduces density toward the project perimeter and surrounding residential communities. • To provide a variety of open space and recreational uses (active and passive). • To design a planned community that compliments existing development in the surrounding area and is compatible with the surrounding environment. • To develop a high -quality private wave basin that provides unique recreational opportunities for future residents of the project, attracts resort guests, and creates a landmark facility that will enhance the City's reputation as the "Gem of the Desert." II. FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS This section identifies the significant unavoidable impacts that require a Statement of Overriding Considerations to be issued by the City upon approval of the project. Based on the analysis contained in the Final EIR, the following impacts to aesthetics and greenhouse gas emissions have been determined to be significant and unavoidable, after all feasible mitigation measures have been considered and adopted. These unavoidable impacts are overridden by the project benefits set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below. Pursuant to Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of La Quinta finds that, for each of the following significant effects, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which mitigate or avoid these significant effects on the environment to the maximum extent feasible. Nevertheless, the City of La Quinta further finds that for each of the significant effects, specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the Final EIR. However, the City finds that with respect to the significant and unavoidable impacts described below, specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant effects on the environment, as more fully described in Section VII below, which is hereby incorporated by this reference. These findings are explained below and are supported by substantial evidence in the record of proceedings. AESTHETICS Effects on scenic vistas. The proposed project will result in potentially significant direct impacts to scenic views and implementation of all feasible mitigation measures will not reduce the impacts to a less than significant impact because development of the project site will result in obstructed and partially obstructed views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains. 0 543 The project's perimeter walls, landscaping, and structures will partially obstruct views of these scenic resources, which is considered a significant impact. To reduce project impacts to scenic vistas to the greatest extent feasible the project will implement Mitigation Measure AES-1, which requires the perimeter walls to be setback from the Madison Street and Avenue 58 public rights - of -way by a minimum average of 30 feet (10 feet more than required under the LQMC), which shall be confirmed through the City's review and approval of final perimeter wall and landscape plans, and Mitigation Measure AES-2, which requires a minimum setback of 75 feet between any residential structure and the Madison Street and Avenue 58 public rights -of -way, (refer to Section IV below). However, impacts associated with scenic vistas cannot be reduced to less than significant levels and will remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures: The project includes mitigation measures in the MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings. AES-1 The perimeter walls around the low density residential planning areas shall be setback from the Madison Street and Avenue 58 public rights -of -way by a minimum average of 30 feet (10 feet more than required under the LQMC), which shall be confirmed through the City's review and approval of final perimeter wall and landscape plans to reduce impacts to existing views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains. AES-2 All residential structures shall be setback by a minimum of 75 feet from the Madison Street and Avenue 58 public rights -of -way to reduce impacts to existing views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains. Finding The City Council of the City of La Quinta finds direct impacts to the scenic resources of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains from development of the project site with perimeter walls, landscaping and structures, to be significant. Pursuant to Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of La Quinta finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which mitigate or avoid these significant effects on the environment to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, mitigation measures AES-1 and AES-2 will increase setbacks of the perimeter walls and residential structures to reduce impacts on views of these scenic resources to the maximum extent feasible. The City of La Quinta further finds that for this significant effect, any development of the site consistent with the City General Plan would have comparable impacts on views of these scenic vistas, and for this reason, finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives, if any, identified in the Final EIR. In fact, the EIR did not identify any mitigation measures or project alternatives that would further reduce the project's unavoidable impact on views of these scenic vistas except the no project/no development alternative, which is inconsistent with the City's General Plan and deemed 10 544 unacceptable by the City Council, as explained in more detail in Section VI below. Furthermore, the City finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project, including but not limited to generating transient occupancy and sales tax revenues to enhance the City's economic base and ensure its long-term financial stability, outweigh the significant effects on the environment, as more fully described in Section VII below, which is hereby incorporated by this reference. These findings are further explained below and are supported by substantial evidence in the record of proceedings. Facts in Support of Finding The project will result in potentially significant direct impacts to views of Coral Mountain. As shown in the line -of -sight analysis and visual simulations included as Exhibits 4.1-4 through 4.1- 13, the Wave Basin, hotel, and other proposed development in Planning Area III will not significantly impact views of Coral Mountain or the Santa Rosa Mountains due to the distance and intervening topography and improvements between this portion of the Project and the viewing locations from the surrounding roadways and communities (see Draft EIR pp. 4.1-22 through 4.1- 45). However, the perimeter walls, landscaping, and structures will obstruct some views of these scenic resources from the surrounding roadways and neighborhoods. These perimeter improvements will ensure that the Project is visually consistent and compatible with the surrounding residential communities, which also have such walls and landscaping. Moreover, these perimeter improvements would be required by the City for any permitted development of the site. Accordingly, none of the project alternatives, other than the no project/no development alternative, would substantially reduce or avoid this impact. While these impacts will be mitigated by AES-1 and AES-2 to the maximum extent feasible, the impacts are considered significant and unavoidable because the perimeter improvements associated with development of the project property will result in obstructed and partially obstructed views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS GHG Emissions that may Significantly Impact the Environment. The annual GHG emissions associated with the operation of the proposed project after implementation of all feasible emission reduction measures, including both enforceable Project Design Features (PDFs) and Mitigation Measure GHG-I, are reduced to less than the applicable annual threshold of significance of 3.65 MTCO2e/service population (see Draft EIR Table 4.7-8). While implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would offset the GHG emissions generated by the project that are in excess of the applicable threshold, by reducing GHG emissions elsewhere through the purchase of carbon credits, it would not change the actual GHG emissions levels of the project itself. In addition, the purchase of carbon credits has not been widely used as mitigation for GHG emissions for residential and resort projects in the Coachella Valley, and therefore, the City Council finds that there is some uncertainty as to whether the purchase of carbon credits adequately, feasibly, and fully mitigates the project's impacts relating to GHG emissions to a less than significant level. Accordingly, the City finds that the proj ect's potential impacts relating to GHG emissions remain significant and unavoidable. 11 545 Project Design Features: The Specific Plan incorporates the following design features for promoting energy efficiency and sustainability, which shall be enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement and Specific Plan: Pedestrian connections shall be provided to surrounding areas consistent with the City's General Plan. Providing a pedestrian access network to link areas of the project site encourages people to walk instead of drive. The project would provide a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site. The project would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. Having different types of land uses near one another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non -auto modes of transport. For example, when residential areas are in the same neighborhood as retail and office buildings, a resident does not need to travel outside of the neighborhood to meet his/her trip needs. A description of diverse uses for urban and suburban areas is provided below The project will include improved design elements to enhance walkability and connectivity. Improved street network characteristics within a neighborhood include street accessibility, usually measured in terms of average block size, proportion of four- way intersections, or number of intersections per square mile. Design is also measured in terms of sidewalk coverage, building setbacks, street widths, pedestrian crossings, presence of street trees, and a host of other physical variables that differentiate pedestrian -oriented environments from auto -oriented environments. Voluntary Commute Trip Reduction Program — A multi -strategy program that encompasses a combination of individual measures. It is presented as a means of preventing double -counting of reductions for individual measures that are included in this strategy. It does so by setting a maximum level of reductions that should be permitted for a combined set of strategies within a voluntary program. Encouraging telecommuting and alternative work schedules reduces the number of commute trips and therefore VMT traveled by employees. Alternative work schedules could take the form of staggered starting times, flexible schedules, or compressed work weeks. This project will implement an employer -sponsored vanpool or shuttle. A vanpool will usually service employees' commute to work while a shuttle will service nearby transit stations and surrounding commercial centers. Employer -sponsored vanpool programs entail an employer purchasing or leasing vans for employee use, and often subsidizing the cost of at least program administration, if not more. The driver usually receives personal use of the van, often for a mileage fee. Scheduling is within the employer's purview, and rider charges are normally set on the basis of vehicle and operating cost. The project will design building shells and building components, such as windows; roof systems: electrical and lighting systems: and heating, ventilating, 12 546 and air conditioning systems to meet 2019 Title 24 Standards which are expected to result in 30% less energy use for non-residential buildings and 53% less energy use for residential use due to lighting upgrades. • The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. • Using electricity generated from photovoltaic (PV) systems displaces electricity demand which would ordinarily be supplied by the local utility. Since zero GHG emissions are associated with electricity generation from PV systems, the GHG emissions reductions from this PDF are equivalent to the emissions that would have been produced had electricity been supplied by the local utility. A minimum of 15% of the project's electricity demand will be generated on -site. • In order to reduce the amount of waste disposed at landfills, the project would be required to implement a 65% waste diversion as required by AB 939. • Increasing the vehicle occupancy by ride sharing will result in fewer cars driving the same trip, and thus a decrease in VMT. The project will include a ride -sharing program as well as a permanent transportation management association membership and funding requirement. The project will promote ride -sharing programs through a multi -faceted approach such as: ■ Designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles ■ Designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride -sharing vehicles ■ Providing a web site or message board for coordinating rides The project will implement marketing strategies to reduce commute trips. Information sharing and marketing are important components to successful commute trip reduction strategies. Implementing commute trip reduction strategies without a complementary marketing strategy will result in lower VMT reductions. Marketing strategies may include: ■ New employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode options Event promotions Publications • Specified use of Energy Star appliances. • Installation of water -efficient plumbing fixtures. • Installation of tankless water heater systems. • Installation of light -emitting diode (LED) technology within homes. • Use of recycled water for common area landscape irrigation. • Use of drought -tolerant plants in landscape design. • Installation of water -efficient irrigation systems with smart sensor controls. • Lighting sources contribute to GHG emissions indirectly, via the production of the electricity that powers these lights. Public street and area lighting includes: streetlights, pedestrian pathway lights, area lighting for parks and parking lots, and outdoor lighting around public buildings. • Lighting design should consider the amount of light required for the area intended to be lit. Lumens are the measure of the amount of light perceived by the human eye. Different light fixtures have different efficacies or the amount of lumens produced per watt of power supplied. This is different than efficiency, and it is 13 547 important that lighting improvements are based on maintaining the appropriate lumens per area when applying this measure. Installing more efficacious lamps will use less electricity while producing the same amount of light, and therefore reduces the associated indirect GHG emissions. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential impacts concerning GHG emissions, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GHG-1: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the Project Applicant shall purchase a minimum of 72,000 MTCO2e credits (2,400 MTCO2e per year for 30 years). The purchase of carbon credits must be made from a CARB- approved carbon registry with independent third -party verification. Examples of approved registries include the American Carbon Registry, Climate Action Reserve, and Verra. The applicant shall submit documentation of the offset purchase to the City demonstrating that it mitigates a minimum of 2,400 MTCO2e per year (72,000 MTCO2e over a 30-year period), prior to any occupancy of the site. Alternatively, the Project Applicant may submit a GHG reduction plan to the City for approval that achieves an equal level of GHG reduction outlined herein. The GHG plan must include enforceable actions that reduce GHG emissions to at or below the total mitigated values presented herein. Finding: The City Council of the City of La Quinta finds that impacts associated with GHG emissions generated by the proposed project are considered significant. Pursuant to Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of La Quinta finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid these significant effects on the environment to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the project design features listed above, including the project's mix of complimentary uses and enhanced connectivity that reduce vehicle miles traveled, and the increased energy and water efficiency measures, substantially reduce the project's GHG emissions. In addition, mitigation measure GHG-1 requires the purchase of carbon credits to partially offset the GHG emissions that will be generated by the project. Nevertheless, the City of La Quinta further finds that while implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would offset the GHG emissions generated by the project that are in excess of the applicable threshold, by reducing GHG emissions elsewhere through the purchase of carbon credits, it would not change the actual GHG emissions levels of the project itself. In addition, the purchase of carbon credits has not been widely used as mitigation for GHG emissions for residential and resort projects in the Coachella Valley, and therefore, the City finds that there is some uncertainty as to whether the purchase of carbon credits adequately and fully mitigates the project's impacts relating to GHG emissions to a less than significant level. Accordingly, the City finds that these specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives, if any, identified 14 MR in the Final EIR. In fact, the EIR did not identify any mitigation measures that could feasibly reduce GHG emissions more effectively than the PDFs and Mitigation Measure GHG-1. Only the No Project and Reduced Density alternatives (Alternatives No. I and No. 3) would further reduce or avoid the project's impact regarding GHG emissions, and the City finds that these alternatives are unacceptable because they will not generate sufficient transient occupancy and sales tax revenue to enhance the City's economic base and ensure its long-term financial stability, and because these alternatives would require reducing the number of residential homes, both of which the City Council finds unacceptable, as described in more detail in Section VI below. Furthermore, the City finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project, including but not limited to generating transient occupancy and sales tax revenues to enhance the City's economic base to ensure its long-term financial stability, outweigh the significant effects on the environment, as more fully described in Section VH below, which is hereby incorporated by this reference. These findings are further explained below and are supported by substantial evidence in the record of proceedings. Facts in Support of Finding: The City of La Quinta relied on the SCAQMD's project level efficiency threshold methodology for determining the significance of a project's GHG emissions. Specifically, the City evaluated SCAQMD's project level 2020 target of no more than 4.8 metric tons of CO2 emissions (MTCO2e) per service population (SP) per year and its 2030 target of no more than 2.88 MTCO2e/SP per year, and determined that for the project's proposed 2026 buildout year, the appropriate threshold of significance was interpolated at 3.65 MTCO2e/SP per year (see Draft EIR, at pp. 4.7-9 through 4.7-10). The project emissions were calculated for all sources of emissions, including construction emissions, operational emissions, and the maximum number of special events allowed per year, and as shown in Table 4.7-7 of the Draft EIR, the project was projected to generate a total of 17,270.47 MTCO2e per year, or 6.46 MTCO2e/SP per year. With implementation of the PDFs set forth above, the project's total GHG emissions are substantially reduced to 12,078.31 MTCO2e per year, which divided by the service population of 2,672 equals 4.52 MTCO2e/SP per year. As this still exceeds the City's threshold of significance of 3.65 MTCO2e/SP per year, the Draft EIR identified Mitigation Measure GHG-1 requiring the purchase of sufficient carbon credits to reduce the project's total GHG emissions by an additional 2,400 MTCO2e per year, which reduces the emissions per SP to 3.62 MTCO2e/year. This is below the threshold of significance of 3.65 MTCO2e/SP per year, and therefore, this mitigation would reduce the project's GHG emissions to a level of less -than -significant (see Draft EIR at pp. 4.7-13 through 4.7-20). However, as stated above, the purchase of carbon credits offsets the project's GHG emissions but does not eliminate the actual GHG emissions that will be generated by the project. In addition, the purchase of carbon credits has not been widely used as mitigation for GHG emissions for residential and resort projects in the Coachella Valley, and therefore, to ensure the maximum disclosure of this impact, the City finds that there is uncertainty as to whether the purchase of carbon credits adequately, feasibly, and fully mitigates the project's impacts relating to GHG emissions to a less than significant level. As a result, the City considers the project's GHG emissions to be significant and unavoidable, and the City is adopting a statement of overriding considerations as described above and in in Section VII below. 15 549 The City Council reviewed and considered the Draft EIR comments relating to GHG emissions, including Comments 52-k, 79-h, 79-i and 79-q (which is a letter from SWAPE attached as Exhibit A to Comment letter 79). The City Council finds that these comments lack merit and fail to provide any substantial evidence of any new or more severe significant adverse effects relating to GHG emissions, beyond what is described above and in the Draft EIR, or of any inaccuracies in the Draft EIR or technical studies. Rather, the City Council finds Final EIR Responses 52-k, 79-h, 79-I and 79-q persuasive, and hereby adopts those responses and incorporates them into the City Council's findings, analysis and conclusions regarding GHG emissions. The City Council also reviewed and considered all subsequent correspondence and comments received after release of the Final EIR, including the letters submitted by Mitchell Tsai, SWAPE, and Bruce Bauer. The City Council finds that these comments lack merit and fail to provide any substantial evidence of any new or more severe significant adverse effects relating to GHG emissions, beyond what is described above and in the Draft EIR, or of any inaccuracies in the Draft EIR or technical studies. In particular, the City Council rejects the assertion in the April 12, 2022 letter from Mitchell Tsai and April 6, 2022 letter from SWAPE that the City has failed to adopt all feasible mitigation measures prior to making the findings set forth above regarding GHG emissions. Rather, the City Council accepts as accurate and persuasive the supplemental expert letter from Haseeb Qureshi at Urban Crossroads, dated May 25, 2022, which explains that all feasible GHG mitigation set forth in the comment letters referenced above, or their equivalent, have been adopted and imposed on the project, either as mitigation measures or enforceable project design features. The City Council finds that all other GHG mitigation measures identified in these comment letters, including the measures set forth in the April 6, 2022 letter from SWAPE, will not substantially reduce the project's remaining GHG emissions because all applicable and feasible measures from this list have been incorporated into the project. This conclusion is based on the supplemental expert letter from Mr. Qureshi, which is hereby incorporated into these findings by this reference. III. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS WHICH ARE AVOIDED OR MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City finds that, for each of the following significant effects identified in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the identified significant effects on the environment, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels. The significant effects and mitigation measures are stated fully in the Final EIR and each of the mitigation measures have been imposed on the Project and are enforceable pursuant to the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions. These findings are explained below and are supported by substantial evidence in the record of proceedings. 16 550 AESTHETICS Impact a Scenic Resources within a State Scenic Highway Corridor. There are no State or locally designated scenic highways in the vicinity of the proposed project. However, the City General Plan identifies views of the Santa Rosa Mountains from certain arterial roadways as "Image Corridors," which include the segment of Madison Street that lies east of the project site, as well as Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. In addition, a partially collapsed adobe house located near the center of the project area, along with concrete pads and footings associated with the residential and agricultural buildings of the ranch on the project site, may be the remains of structures dating from the 1920s or before. The site may also include the original trash pits or privies which, if located, could contain valuable artifacts revealing much about life in the harsh environment at such an early date. Per the findings of the Cultural Report, the site meets the definition of a historical resource and impacts to it would be significant. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential impacts concerning impacts to scenic resources, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: AES-1 The perimeter walls around the low density residential planning areas shall be setback from the Madison Street and Avenue 58 public rights -of -way by a minimum average of 30 feet (10 feet more than required under the LQMC), which shall be confirmed through the City's review and approval of final perimeter wall and landscape plans to reduce impacts to existing views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains. AES-2 All residential structures shall be setback by a minimum of 75 feet from the Madison Street and Avenue 58 public rights -of -way to reduce impacts to existing views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains. CUL-1: A comprehensive recordation program shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist for Site 33-008388. The program shall contain detailed drawings and measurements to preserve the information on the adobe building. Such information would include the floor plan, elevations, building materials and their configurations, and any other notable structural and architectural details. The adobe remains and an appropriate buffer determined by the project archaeologist shall be flagged and cornered off during all ground disturbance and preserved in place. Prior to the occupancy of any structure in Planning Area II, the adobe will be fenced off and an informational plaque describing the history of the ranch complex shall be provided, and the project proponent shall provide the City with the CC&Rs for the project area, demonstrating that the feature would be maintained in perpetuity by the project's Homeowners Association. Special attention should be given to the residence foundation, which, may be the remains of one of the earlier structures at the site, dating from 1920s or before. The 17 551 footings and slabs at this location should be cleared and measured, and attempts should be made to locate the original trash pits or privies which could contain valuable artifacts revealing much about life in the harsh environment at such an early date. The scatter of artifacts has the greatest number of pre-1925 artifacts, mostly in the form of sun -colored glass, but also in brown and olive glass, porcelain, ceramics and more. There may be remains of an early structure near this point, hidden amidst the broad stand of tamarisk trees, an original windbreak. Search of these remains is required to ensure the most complete recovery possible of the early 20th century artifacts and features. Photos, measurements, and artifacts shall be catalogued, analyzed, reported, and curated at the Coachella Valley Museum (Love et al. 1998:54). Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for the potentially significant effect on scenic resources described above, and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR, and the City Council further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures AES-1, AES-2, and CUL-1, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: As stated above, there are no State or locally designated scenic highways in the vicinity of the proposed project (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-45). The City General Plan identifies views of the Santa Rosa Mountains from certain arterial roadways as "Image Corridors," which include the segment of Madison Street that lies east of the project site, as well as Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. The Specific Plan includes a 22-foot maximum height on residential structures within a 150-foot setback distance from these perimeter roadways in compliance with LQMC § 9.50.020. In addition, mitigation measures AES-1 and AES-2 identified above will be implemented and will further reduce potential impacts to these Image Corridors, which avoid any significant effects on the City's Image Corridors (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-45). While the project site contains partially collapsed remains of an adobe structure that qualifies as a significant historic resource, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 will assure that this significant historic resource is protected, and as a result, there will be no impact relating to damage of a historic scenic resource (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-46 and Appendix E). In addition, due to the vandalized and deteriorated condition of the structure, and the fact that it is not readily visible to drivers and pedestrians on the perimeter roadways, this structure is not considered a significant scenic resource, even though it has historical significance. Based on the foregoing, with the implementation of mitigation measure CUL-1, the Project will not have a significant effect on scenic resources within a state scenic highway corridor. 18 552 Light and Glare. The development site for the proposed project occurs on approximately 386 acres of vacant land with scattered vegetation throughout. The project site does not currently have existing sources of lighting. Presently, existing sources of fixed nighttime lighting in the project vicinity can be attributed to the existing residential areas located north, east and south of the site, which include landscape lighting along Madison Street, Avenue 58, and Avenue 60 east of Madison Street. The proposed project will result in potentially significant direct and cumulative impacts by creating a new source of light or glare which could adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential impacts concerning light and glare, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: AES-3 The operation of the Wave Basin will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and the lighting will only be permitted between dusk and 10:00 p.m. to ensure compliance with the City's outdoor lighting requirements (LQMC 9.100.150) Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for the potentially significant effects related to light and glare described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measure AES-3, which has been adopted by the City and is enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The Project will comply with the City's outdoor lighting requirements (LQMC 9.100.150), including the permitted hours of lighting, as well as the required shielding to prevent light and glare spillage outside of the Project site (Draft EIR at pp. 4.1-60 — 4.1-61). In addition, the majority of project lighting will consist of lighting typical of residential and commercial development and will fully comply with the City's Municipal Code requirements. With respect to the Wave Basin lighting system, the lighting analysis performed for the Project and included in the Draft EIR confirms that the Wave Basin lighting will not emit light outside of the immediate area of the Wave Basin itself, and minimal to no glare will be perceived outside the Wave Basin planning area (Draft EIR at pp. 4.1-61 — 4.1-64 and Exhibits 4.1-14 — 4.1-19). As further explained in the Final EIR at pp. 2-5 — 2-11, the 80-foot LED light fixtures proposed around the Wave Basin will be Musco Total Lighting Control (TLC) for LED technology fixtures, are the 19 553 optimal height to allow for adequate lighting of the Wave Basin while maximizing the cut off angle to minimize the visibility of direct light and avoid up -lighting and light spill to adjacent areas. As shown on page 2-10 of the Final EIR, the Wave Basin lighting will drop to 0.01 foot candles (FC) within or immediately adjacent to the Wave Basin planning area boundary, which is an imperceptible light level (also see Final EIR Appendices B.l and B.2). The Wave Basin lighting system fully complies with the City's "dark skies" lighting requirements set forth in Section 9.100.150 of the Municipal Code (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-62). Finally, mitigation measure AES-3 limits the Wave Basin lighting to the hours of dusk to 10:00 p.m., in compliance with the City's outdoor recreational lighting limitations (LQMC § 9.100.150). In response to requests made by City officials, an actual demonstration of the Musco TLC for LED lights proposed to be used for the Wave Basin was performed on November 17, 2021, from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Two poles and lighting fixtures were staged on -site, one at the exact height and location of proposed pole 8, which is the pole closest to Coral Mountain. The other was staged at the exact height of proposed pole 16 (the pole nearest adjacent residences) but was staged approximately 135' south of the proposed location (closer to the adjacent residences) due to physical access constraints. Although only two 600-Watt lighting fixtures are proposed for poles 8 and 16, to be conservative in disclosing impacts, four 1200-Watt fixtures were used for both poles to provide a demonstration of the proposed lighting system that exceeds the amount of lighting proposed in these two, most -sensitive locations. Light readings were taken before and after the light fixtures were turned on and these readings validated and confirmed the computer modeling described in the Draft EIR and above. At 120-feet behind and to the side of each pole, the light readings were consistently at 0.01 FC, an imperceptible level that matched background light levels, indicating that these locations were receiving no light from the test fixtures. These test results are included and described in Final EIR Appendix B.2, which is incorporated herein by this reference. The City Council reviewed the Draft EIR comments regarding concerns raised by the public over the Wave Basin lighting system and its potential impacts, including Comments 52-i, 83-z, 83-aa, 83-bb, 83-cc, 83-dd, and the two -page letter from Minegar & Associates, dated August 2, 2021, attached to Comment letter 83, and considered the comments made during the public hearings. Based on the information cited above in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, and Appendices, and the additional evidence presented at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings, the City Council finds that these comments, including the Minegar & Associates letter, do not accurately describe the proposed Wave Basin lighting or its effects on the surrounding communities, nor do they contain substantial evidence that the project will have any significant impacts regarding light and glare, or other aesthetic impacts, beyond what is disclosed in the Final EIR and set forth in these Findings. Instead, the City Council finds persuasive and adopts the substantial evidence, analysis, and conclusions set forth in Final EIR Responses 52-1, 83-z, 83-aa, 83-bb, 83-cc, and 83- dd, and hereby incorporates those Responses into these Findings. With respect to the "cones of light" described during the public hearings that may be visible from outside the project boundaries, the City Council finds, based on the additional line -of -sight exhibits and other substantial evidence presented during the public hearings, that while some portion of the Wave Basin lighting may be visible from outside the project boundaries, such limited views of the lighting will be consistent with the other sources of light and glare in the area and will not have any significant adverse effects. 20 554 Conclusion Through compliance with the proposed Specific Plan design guidelines, lighting system design, and existing City of La Quinta ordinances and requirements, as well as the implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1, AES-2, and AES-3, development of the project would result in less than significant impacts to aesthetic resources, with the exception of impacts to scenic vistas of the Santa Rosa Mountains and Coral Mountain as described in Section III of these Findings. AIR QUALITY Cumulatively considerable net increase of anv criteria pollutant The project's construction emissions (without mitigation) are shown in Table 4.2-5 of the Draft EIR and would exceed SCAQMD's regional threshold for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during Phase 1 construction activities. Construction phases involving paving and architectural coating are sources of VOC and NOX emissions. The exceedance is caused by the overlapping of paving and architectural coating assumed in the analysis. The VOC emissions generated would therefore exceed SCAQMD thresholds for cumulatively considerable net increases in criteria pollutants, and thus result in significant impacts requiring mitigation. Project operational -source emissions (without mitigation) are shown in Table 4.2-7 of the Draft EIR and would exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for emissions of VOCs during Phase 3 activities. In addition, the proposed special events could cause cumulatively considerable net increases in VOC and nitrous oxide (NOx) that exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance without mitigation, as shown in Table 4.2-9 of the Draft EIR, which would also constitute a significant adverse effect. Project Design Features. The PDFs are site design elements and operations recognized by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) for providing prof ect-level emissions reductions through a reduced automobile use (reduced vehicle miles traveled), energy efficiency, and other area source reductions, which will be enforceable by the City pursuant to the terins of the Development Agreement. The following PDFs apply: pedestrian connections, mixture of land uses, walkability and connectivity design elements, commute trip reduction program, telecommuting and alternative work schedules, employer -sponsored shuttles, compliance with 2019 Title 24 standards, compliance with SCAQMD Rule 445, on -site photovoltaic electricity supply (15%), and waste diversion per AB 939. Mitigation Measures: 21 555 To mitigate potential project specific and cumulative air quality impacts regarding criteria pollutants, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: AQ-1: During Phase 1 of construction, the paving installation activity shall not overlap with the architectural coating (building painting) activity. That prohibition shall be included on all building plans. AQ-2: For equipment greater than 150 horsepower (>150 HP), the Construction Contractor shall ensure that off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 emissions standards and shall ensure that all construction equipment shall be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. AQ-3: The project will require the use of low VOC paints for re -painting and maintenance of exterior structures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 (not to exceed 50 grams per liter VOCs for interior and exterior building envelope re -painting). Under federal and state law, SCAQMD is under a legal obligation to enforce air pollution regulations. These regulations are primarily meant to ensure that the surrounding (or ambient) air meets federal and state air quality standards. The South Coast AQMD also has broad authority to regulate toxic and hazardous air emissions, and these regulations are enforced in the same manner as those which pertain to the ambient air quality standards. The following standard regulatory requirements and best available control measures shall appear on all project grading plans, construction specifications and bid documents, and the City shall ensure that such language is incorporated prior to issuance of any development permits: BACM AQ-1: The contractor shall adhere to applicable measures contained in Table 1 of Rule 403 including, but not limited to: • All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the mid -morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are limited to 15 miles per hour or less. 22 556 BACM AQ-2: The following measures shall be incorporated into project plans and specifications as implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 (3): • Only "Low -Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)" paints (no more than 50 gram/liter (g/L) of VOC) consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. BACM AQ-3: The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for the significant air quality effects related to criteria pollutants described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of the PDFs, mitigation measures AQ-I through AQ-3, and BACM AQ-I through BACM AQ-3, as described and recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Construction phases involving paving and architectural coating are sources of VOC and NOX emissions, and as stated above, would exceed SCAQMD's regional threshold of significance during Phase 1 construction activities without mitigation. However, through the implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM) AQ-1, the overlap of these activities will be prevented, such that it will avoid simultaneous emissions of these pollutants and, therefore, peak emissions will remain below the established thresholds and the associated impacts will be reduced to less than significant levels (Draft EIR Table 4.2-6). Additionally, MM AQ-2 would decrease localized emissions and further reduce construction impacts in compliance with the EPA and CARB Tier 3 emissions standards, which are aimed at reducing motor vehicle emissions, including nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, and carbon monoxide. Implementation of these mitigation measures will ensure that project construction emissions are below applicable SCAQMD significance thresholds, and thus do not constitute a cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria pollutant. Project operational -source emissions will be reduced to less than significant levels after implementation of PDFs and MM-AQ-3. The following PDFs apply: pedestrian connections, mixture of residential and commercial land uses, walkability and connectivity design elements, a commute trip reduction program, telecommuting and alternative work schedules, employer - sponsored shuttles, compliance with 2019 Title 24 standards, compliance with SCAQMD Rule 445, on -site photovoltaic electricity supply (15%), and waste diversion per AB 939. In addition, MM AQ-3 establishes a paint VOC content limit of 50 grams per liter to perform interior and exterior re -painting during the life of the project. After implementation of PDFs and MM AQ-3, special event operational -source emissions will not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for emissions of any criteria pollutant. The PDFs are site design elements and 23 557 operations and will be enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement. As shown in Tables 4.2-8 and 4.2-10, with implementation of the PDFs and mitigation measures, the project operations, including during special events, will not generate cumulatively considerable increases in any criteria pollutants, thus reducing the project's impacts to a less than significant level. The City Council also reviewed and considered all correspondence and comments concerning potential air quality impacts, including the letters submitted by Mitchell Tsai, SWAPE, and Bruce Bauer. The City Council finds that these comments lack merit and fail to provide any substantial evidence of any new or more severe significant adverse air quality effects, beyond what is described above and in the Draft EIR, or of any inaccuracies in the Draft EIR or technical studies. In particular, the City Council rejects the assertion that it has failed to properly evaluate air quality effects and/or adopt all feasible mitigation measures prior to making the findings set forth above. The City Council finds that all potential air quality effects of the project have been properly evaluated in the Final EIR and technical appendices, and that the project design features evaluated in that analysis have properly been made enforceable by the City through the project Development Agreement and conditions of approval. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Localized air quality impacts were evaluated at sensitive receptor land uses nearest the project site. Due to the phased nature of the project development, future phases have the potential to generate construction impacts to the residents of previous phases of development. Phase 2 building construction activities will impact on -site sensitive receptors in Phase 1. Similarly, Phase 3 building construction activities will impact on -site sensitive receptors in Phases 1 and 2. Construction Emissions: Without mitigation, localized construction emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for emissions for NOX, CO or PM2.5, but would exceed PM10 emissions by 0.28 pounds per day during Phase 1 of construction. Phase 2 and Phase 3 construction would involve relatively smaller disturbance areas not resulting in exceedances for this criteria pollutant. The PM10 exceedance during Phase 1 represents a potentially significant impact that requires mitigation. To evaluate the potential impacts of Phase 2 and Phase 3 grading on on -site sensitive receptors, such as Phase 1 and Phase 2 dwelling units that become occupied, the mitigated emissions from those construction activities were compared against the lowest localized emission thresholds for the closest distance interval available in the SCAQMD Look -Up Tables for the Coachella Valley. The applicable construction -source mitigation measures are Mitigation Measure AQ-1 aimed at preventing paving activity from overlapping with architectural coating activities and Mitigation Measure AQ-2 aimed at ensuring that equipment greater than 150 horsepower complies with EPA/CARB Tier 3 emissions standards and to ensure that all construction equipment is tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Operational Emissions: The project is proposed to consist of a wave pool, a 150-key hotel, 104 attached resort residential DUs, associated resort commercial development, 496 detached DUs, and 60,000 sf of retail. According to SCAQMD's LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the 24 558 operational phase of a proposed project, if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods idling at the site (e.g., transfer facilities and warehouse buildings). The proposed project does not include such uses, and thus, due to the lack of significant stationary source emissions, the project will not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project specific and cumulative air quality impacts relating to exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: AQ-1: During Phase 1 of construction, the paving installation activity shall not overlap with the architectural coating (building painting) activity. That prohibition shall be included on all building plans. AQ-2: For equipment greater than 150 horsepower (>150 HP), the Construction Contractor shall ensure that off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 emissions standards and shall ensure that all construction equipment shall be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The following standard regulatory requirements and best available control measures shall appear on all project grading plans, construction specifications and bid documents, and the City shall ensure that such language is incorporated prior to issuance of any development permits: BACM AQ-1: The contractor shall adhere to applicable measures contained in Table 1 of Rule 403 including, but not limited to: • All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the mid -morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are limited to 15 miles per hour or less. 25 559 Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for the significant air quality effects related to exposure to substantial concentrations of pollutants described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 and BACM AQ-1, as described and recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: As described above, without mitigation, localized construction emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for emissions for NOX, CO or PM2.5, but would exceed PM10 emissions by 0.28 pounds per day during Phase 1 of construction. As shown in Table 4.2-12 and discussed on pages 4.2-36 — 4.2-40, the PM10 emissions during Phase 1 of construction would exceed the SCAQMD localized threshold at the nearest off -site sensitive receptor location, identified as R7 (the nearest exiting residence located north of Avenue 60, approximately 37 feet from the project boundary, as shown in Exhibit 4.2-1). However, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2, all criteria pollutant emissions, including PM10, will be below SCAQMD's localized significance threshold (see Table 4.2-13). Phase 2 and Phase 3 construction would involve relatively smaller disturbance areas not resulting in exceedances for any criteria pollutant with implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 (Draft EIR, at p. 4.2-40 and Table 4.2-14). Accordingly, the project will not cause any significant effects, including adverse health effects, as a result of construction related air emissions with implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2. Please also see Final EIR, Response to Comment 42-f, which is hereby incorporated by this reference. As described above and analyzed in further detail in the Draft EIR at p. 4.2-40, the proposedproject does not include stationary emissions sources (e.g., factories) or uses that require lengthy idling of vehicles (e.g., transfer stations or warehouses), and therefore, the project will not cause long-term operational emissions that could exceed SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds or cause any significant health or other impacts on sensitive receptors in the area. The City Council also considered the supplemental letters from Mitchell Tsai, dated April 12, 2022, and SWAPE, dated April 6, 2022, and finds that those letters fail to provide evidence of any new or substantially more severe effects than previously disclosed and analyzed in the EIR. The City Council specifically rejects the assertion in those letters that the air quality analysis in the EIR understates operational emissions, and the City Council bases this conclusion on the supplemental expert letter from Haseeb Qureshi at Urban Crossroads, dated May 25, 2022, which confirms that the operational emissions were calculated properly. Based on Mr. Qureshi's expert letter, which is hereby incorporated into these findings, the City Council also rejects the assertion that a separate health risk assessment for diesel particulate matter is required or appropriate for the project because the project will not generate sufficient diesel particulate matter to cause any potential adverse 26 560 effects. The City Council further finds that the Air Quality analysis properly disclosed and analyzed the potential health risks associated with the project's construction and operational toxic air contaminant emissions, based on the expert evidence and explanation in Mr. Qureshi's supplemental letter. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Candidate, sensitive or special status species and Riparian habitat. The proposed project site will result in potentially significant impacts related to species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species and sensitive natural communities. These species are identified on pages 4.3-11 — 4.3-15 of the Draft EIR, and include the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep (PBS), a federally endangered species and State endangered and California Fully Protected species, the Burrowing owl, and numerous species of bats. In addition, the project site has the vegetation to potentially support nesting birds which are protected by California Fish and Game Code and by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), which are addressed in the "movement of wildlife" section below. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special status species, the following mitigation measure are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: BI0-1: Burrowing owl surveys shall be performed by a qualified biologist, approved by the City prior to any site disturbance activities. A minimum of two surveys, occurring at least three weeks apart, shall be completed in advance of any site disturbance activities. If disturbance activities are expected to start during the burrowing owl breeding season, three surveys shall be completed. The final burrowing owl survey shall be completed within three days prior to initiation of any site disturbance activities. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted following accepted protocol and the requirements specified in the CVMSHCP (see pp. 4-168 & 4-169). Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will survey the construction area and an area up to 500 feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160-foot diameter buffer will be established during non -breeding season or a 250-foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. The buffer area will be staked and flagged. No development activities will be permitted within the buffer until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow and have left the burrow. If the burrow is found to be unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to owls, and construction may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted 27 561 Wildlife Agency protocols. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. If burrowing owls are observed within the Project site during construction activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and provided with proposed avoidance and minimization measures, consistent with the requirements of the CVMSHCP. BIO-7: To ensure that the Project will avoid any significant construction or operational noise impacts on wildlife using Coral Mountain, noise monitoring will occur for (1) all construction activities within 150 feet of the base of Coral Mountain, and (2) operational noise levels during any special events and at least once annually during regular Wave Basin operations, or as determined appropriate by the City Manager or his/her designee. If noise levels exceed 75 dBA, construction and/or operational changes shall be made, as applicable, to reduce the noise levels at Coral Mountain to below 75 dBA. BIO-8: Existing native vegetation, particularly palo verde trees, will be retained where feasible. Landscaping shall include native desert species. BIO-9: Onsite lakes will be designed and constructed by industry professionals and will incorporate proper aeration, circulation and filtration to maintain a balanced lake ecosystem. Lakes will be stocked with beneficial fish and plant species. Limited chemical applications will be utilized as necessary. Ongoing maintenance will ensure that onsite lakes function properly to control any invasive species or other nuisance conditions. 13I0-10: An education program about the Peninsular bighorn sheep and their associated habitat shall be implemented and maintained throughout the resort, open space, and low -density community programs through the use of signage, pamphlets, and staff education. The Education Program should inform the reason of why specific measures are being taken to support recovery of Peninsular bighorn sheep. The Education Program should include the ecology of Peninsular bighorn sheep, what threats this species is currently facing, and how recovery actions will reduce these threats. This includes information that explains: (1) why restrictions on toxic plants, fences, and pesticides are needed; (2) how artificial feeding of coyotes could adversely affect bighorn sheep; and (3) how recreational activities may affect sheep. The use of interpretive signs is encouraged. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects on candidate, sensitive, or special status species described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes 28 562 or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1 and BIO-7 through BIO-10, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Burrowing Owls: Mitigation measure 13I0-1 conforms to the protocols and requirements of the CVMSHCP and will ensure that construction activities will not impact any burrowing owls or active nests. Although CDFW requested revisions to mitigation measure 13I0-1 in its letter dated August 13, 2021 (Comment letter 13), these revisions exceed what is required under the CVMSHCP and the City finds that these further revisions are not required to fully mitigate potential impacts to burrowing owls. Also see Comment No. 13-o and the response thereto in the Final EIR, which is hereby incorporated by this reference. Peninsular Bighorn Sheep: PBS in the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountain ranges is a covered species under the CVMSHCP. PBS Habitat within these two mountain ranges are part of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area, one of twenty-one Conservation Areas that comprise the Reserve System identified in the CVMSHCP. The project site itself does not contain suitable PBS habitat and is located approximately 0.62 acres to the east of the Conservation area (see ELMT Biological Assessment, Appendix D.5 of the Final EIR). Coral Mountain provides limited foraging habitat and limited escape cover for PBS, and the project has the potential to act as an attractant for food and water sources. The intervening area between Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains consisting of both hilly and flat terrain owned by the Bureau of Land Management, which provides some escape cover, but exposes PBS venturing out of the Santa Rosas to predation by coyotes and other large predators. The Coral Mountain project site is not within or adjacent to the boundaries of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area and, therefore, but is subject to the CVMSHCP Conservation Measures. It is recognized that habitat modification from development can attract PBS and create threats to PBS in the form of collisions with vehicles, poisoning by toxic landscape plants, entanglement in wire fences, harassment by dogs, increased predation by native predators, coyote and mountain lion, and exposure to toxins such as herbicides and insecticides. In addition, Coral Mountain and the adjacent BLM open space were identified as "essential habitat" in the USFW 2000 PBS Recovery Plan. Accordingly, to avoid any significant impacts to PBS and its essential habitat the project will comply with the Adjacency Guidelines in the CVMSHCP relating to PBS because the sheep are known to travel outside the designated Conservation Area for sources of forage and water. The project as proposed is consistent with these guidelines which address toxic and other hazardous plants, drainage, exposure to toxic chemicals and byproducts, lighting, noise, grading near conservation areas because the Specific Plan includes a Conceptual PBS Barrier Plan that defines a fencing plan for the project site. The barrier/fence along the western edge of the site would eliminate these potential threats to PBS from site development (See ELMT memo and Exhibit 2, 29 563 at Final EIR Appendix D.5). A barrier/fence would prevent PBS from exiting Coral Mountain onto the site, where there is no escape cover and where they would be vulnerable to predation and exposure to toxic plants, herbicides and insecticides. PBS would still be able to transverse the open space associated with the BLM lands between the Santa Rosas and Coral Mountain but will not be able to migrate off Coral Mountain onto the valley floor area of the project site. Also see Final EIR, pp. 2-11 — 2-16. The fence/wall design will be approved by the City of La Quinta in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). It will draw from the prototypical fencing types described in the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) "PBS Barrier Project" and will be consistent with the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan. In addition, and consistent with the CVMSHCP adjacency guidelines, the Specific Plan plant palette has been modified to include approved specimens listed as "Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping" and will avoid specimens listed as "Prohibited Invasive Ornamental Plants" on lands adjoining the sheep barrier. In addition, the approved project plant palette will be referenced in the Project CC&Rs and will be enforceable by the property owners' association for the life of the project. Finally, mitigation measure BIO-8 has been added to retain native vegetation where feasible. At the request of CDFW, two mitigation measures have been added to further minimize any potential to attract PBS to the project site or to impact PBS. Mitigation measure BIO-9 requires that all water features be designed and maintained to eliminate the potential for arboviral disease vectors (13I0-9). In addition, mitigation measure BIO-10 requires implementation of an educational program about PBS and its habitat that includes the preparation of informational materials for distribution to homeowners and hotel guests on the local environmental setting, including proper interactions with PBS. In addition, the project developer will collaborate with the Desert Recreation District (DRD) regarding the planned public trail connection through the property. The DRD master plan envisions interpretative materials on the trail and markers intended to educate and inform experiences regarding the local setting, including desert flora and fauna. Please also see Response 13-m in Chapter 2 of the Final EIR, at pp. 2-86 — 2-88. Finally, to ensure that the project will avoid any significant construction or operational noise impacts on PBS and other wildlife using Coral Mountain, Mitigation Measure BIO-7 requires noise monitoring for (1) all construction activities within 150 feet of the base of Coral Mountain, and (2) operational noise levels during any special events and at least once annually during regular Wave Basin operations, or as determined appropriate by the City Manager or his/her designee. If noise levels exceed 75 dBA, construction and/or operational changes shall be made, as applicable, to reduce the noise levels at Coral Mountain to below 75 dBA. Also see Response 13-q at p. 2-93 of the Final EIR. Based on these project features, and the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-7, BIO-8, BIO-9 and BIO-10, the project will be consistent with the CVMSHCP and will not result in significant direct or indirect impacts to PBS or involve the development of suitable habitat that could create an attractive nuisance for PBS. 30 564 Movement of wildlife. There is no evidence of migratory wildlife corridors or native wildlife nursery sites on the project site or adjacent properties. Since the project property does not lie within a CVMSHCP-designated wildlife corridor and the project site is adjacent to development, the proposed project is not anticipated to have significant impacts related to habitat fragmentation and regional wildlife movement. However, the project site has the vegetation to potentially support nesting birds which are protected by California Fish and Game Code and by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. MBTA makes it unlawful to "take" any migratory bird including their nests, eggs, or products. Migratory birds include geese, ducks, shorebirds, raptors, songbirds, and many others. Burrowing owl, ferruginous hawk, prairie falcon, black -tailed gnatcatcher, and Le Conte's thrasher could occur on the site, and are covered by the MBTA. Therefore, potential impacts on nesting birds are considered a significant adverse effect, and mitigation is required to reduce the impact to nesting birds to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts to the movement of wildlife, including migratory birds and bats, the following mitigation measure are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: BIO-2: In June 2021, a qualified bat biologist will conduct a second round of focused nighttime surveys for roosting bats at locations where suitable roosting habitat is identified. The nighttime survey will include a combination of acoustic and exit count methods, and will take place during the bat maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley) to enable detection of maternity -roosting bats. If maternity roosts are identified within the project area, the biologist will coordinate with CDFW to implement avoidance measures during the bat maternity season in accordance with CDFW's established standards. No construction activities will occur within a 300-foot buffer of maternity roost sites during the bat maternity season unless concurrence is received from CDFW to reduce that buffer distance based upon the bat species present and the activities occurring. BIO-3: Removal of trees (including palm trees) shall occur outside the bat maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), which coincides with the bird nesting season, to avoid the potential for "take" of flightless young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two-step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols this two-step removal shall occur over two consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without 31 565 supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. BIO-4: To avoid impacts to roosting bats from the installation of new light fixtures associated with the proposed development, all lighting fixtures shall have light shields or similar devices (i.e., dark sky compliant lighting) installed to ensure that there is no light trespass on to Coral Mountain and surrounding open space. A supplemental light study will be performed to collect nighttime lighting measurements and confirm that no light trespass onto Coral Mountain is occurring; this will be submitted for City approval prior to issuance of any permit for occupancy or use of the Wave Basin. BIO-5: A qualified bat biologist shall confirm the absence of roosting bats prior to any restoration work or other disturbance of the adobe site. If bats are found or if the absence of bats cannot be confirmed, the bat biologist will install or directly supervise installation of humane eviction devices and exclusionary material to prevent bats from roosting in the building. Implementation of the humane eviction/exclusions is typically performed in the fall (September or October) preceding construction activity at each structure to avoid impacts to hibernating bats during the winter months or during the maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), when nonvolant (flightless) young are present. Any humane eviction/exclusion devices must be installed at least 10 days prior to the demolition of a structure housing bats to allow sufficient time for the bats to vacate the roost(s). BIO-6: To ensure compliance with California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA and to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds, vegetation removal and ground disturbing activities shall be conducted outside the general bird nesting season. Any vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and/or construction activities that occur during the nesting season (February 1 — August 31) will require that all suitable habitats be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist approved by the City. Prior to commencement of clearing, a qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys within 14 days and repeated 3 days prior to ground - disturbing activities. If any active nests are detected a buffer of 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) around the nest adjacent to construction will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. During construction activities, the qualified biologist shall continue biological monitoring activities at a frequency recommended by the qualified biologist using his or her best professional judgment. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance and minimization measures may be adjusted and construction activities stopped or redirected by the qualified biologist using his or her best professional judgment to avoid any take of nesting birds. 32 566 BIO-7: To ensure that the Project will avoid any significant construction or operational noise impacts on wildlife using Coral Mountain, noise monitoring will occur for all construction activities using heavy equipment within 150 feet of the base of Coral Mountain. If noise levels exceed 75 dBA, construction or operational changes or other modifications shall be made, as directed by the project biologist to reduce the noise levels at Coral Mountain to below 75 dBA. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects on the movement of wildlife, including migratory birds and bats, described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures 13I0-1 and BIO-7 through 13I0-10, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: To ensure compliance with the California Fish & Game Code and the MBTA, mitigation measure BIO-6 requires completion of pre -construction nesting surveys by a qualified biologist prior to any ground -disturbing activities during the nesting season, and requires biological monitoring to continue as needed. No construction will occur within a 300-foot buffer of any nests (500 feet for raptors). Implementation of mitigation measure BIO-6 will avoid any take of nesting birds. Also see Comment 13-p and Response 13-p on pp. 2-91 and 2-92 of the Final EIR. Bats: To avoid impacts to all potential bat species which may occur on the site, additional maternity -season surveys were performed in June 2021 to maximize the probability of detection of maternity roosts for all bat species (implementing proposed mitigation measure BIO-2.) The results of the maternity season surveys determined that large numbers of bats consistent with the presence of maternity roosting were observed emerging from the crevices and small caves along the rock outcrops in a portion of Coral Mountain (see Updated Focused Bat Surveys report, Appendix D.3 to the Final EIR, at p. 9). Although no construction will occur at these rock outcrops, roosting bats in this area could be adversely affected by increases in artificial lighting and noise. To reduce potential impacts to roosting bats to less than significant levels, mitigation measures BIO-3, BIO-4, and BIO-5 require all tree removals to comply with CDFW protocols, prohibit artificial lighting on any portion of Coral Mountain and confirmation of same through a further light study once the Wave Basin lighting system is installed, and an additional roosting bat survey by a qualified biologist prior to any restoration work or other disturbance of the adobe site. In addition, to ensure that the project will avoid any significant construction or operational noise impacts on bats, Mitigation Measure BIO-7 requires noise monitoring for (1) all construction activities within 150 feet of the base of Coral Mountain, and (2) operational noise levels during any special events and at least once annually during regular Wave Basin operations, or as 33 567 determined appropriate by the City Manager or his/her designee. If noise levels exceed 75 dBA, construction and/or operational changes shall be made, as applicable, to reduce the noise levels at Coral Mountain to below 75 dBA. Also see Response 13-q at p. 2-93 of the Final EIR. Also see Responses 13-r at pp. 2-94 — 2-95 of the Final EIR. Consistency with local policies or applicable habitat conservation plan. The project lies within the boundary of the CVMSHCP which outlines policies for conservation habitats and natural communities and is implemented for this property by the City of La Quinta. As the site lies outside the plan's designated conservation areas, the CVMSHCP does not establish any policies applicable to the removal of the species of trees and other habitat on the project site, except that the project will be required to pay the CVMSHCP mitigation fee to mitigate the loss of habitat for covered species in the Coachella Valley. However, compliance with the CVMSHCP also requires compliance with the Land Use Adjacency Guidelines specified in Section 4.5 of the plan and, to the extent applicable, the specific conservation measures identified for the covered species. Failure to comply with such guidelines is considered a potentially significant impact. There are no other local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans currently in place, other than the CVMSHCP, that are applicable to the proposed project. The project's consistency with the CVMSHCP is fully addressed under the discussion of protected and special status species above, which is hereby incorporated by this reference. With payment of the required CVMSHCP fee and implementation of the required sheep barrier and mitigation measures BI0-7 through BI0-10, the project is fully consistent with the CVMSHCP, including all applicable species conservation measures and adjacency guidelines. CULTURAL RESOURCES Impacts to Historical Resources. Implementation of the proposed project will result in potentially significant impacts to historical resources, including California Historical Resources Inventory Site 33-038838, which is the remains of a partially collapsed adobe house and other features of the former Coral Reef Ranch located on the project site. Historical research suggests that the adobe house was likely constructed in the 1920s or 1930s, and may be one of the earliest settlements and agricultural enterprises to be established in the present day boundary of the City. Although the adobe building has been badly damaged and vandalized, further damage to this known historic resource from project construction would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts to historic resources, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: 34 CUL-1: A comprehensive recordation program shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist for Site 33-008388. The program shall contain detailed drawings and measurements to preserve the information on the adobe building. Such information would include the floor plan, elevations, building materials and their configurations, and any other notable structural and architectural details. The adobe remains and an appropriate buffer determined by the project archaeologist shall be flagged and cornered off during all ground disturbance and preserved in place. Prior to the occupancy of any structure in Planning Area II, the adobe will be fenced off and an informational plaque describing the history of the ranch complex shall be provided, and the project proponent shall provide the City with the CC&Rs for the project area, demonstrating that the feature would be maintained in perpetuity by the project's Homeowners Association. Special attention should be given to the residence foundation, which, may be the remains of one of the earlier structures at the site, dating from 1920s or before. The footings and slabs at this location should be cleared and measured, and attempts should be made to locate the original trash pits or privies which could contain valuable artifacts revealing much about life in the harsh environment at such an early date. The scatter of artifacts has the greatest number of pre-1925 artifacts, mostly in the form of sun -colored glass, but also in brown and olive glass, porcelain, ceramics and more. There may be remains of an early structure near this point, hidden amidst the broad stand of tamarisk trees, an original windbreak. Search of these remains is required to ensure the most complete recovery possible of the early 20th century artifacts and features. Photos, measurements, and artifacts shall be catalogued, analyzed, reported, and curated at the Coachella Valley Museum (Love et al. 1998:54). Finding Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for the significant effects on historic resources described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measure CUL-1, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: While implementation of the proposed project has the potential to impact the identified historical resources described above and in the Draft EIR (see pp. 4.4-12 — 4.4-15), these potentially significant impacts to historical resources will be mitigated to below a level of significance through implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1, which requires a comprehensive recordation program for the remains of the adobe structure (Site 33-008388) to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. To avoid impacts to this site, no earth moving activities shall occur until the site 35 569 is fenced and flagged; a comprehensive recordation project of the site has been completed; and preservation and stabilization of the remains in place as a community feature with an informational plaque has been completed, as described in mitigation measure CUL-1. The measure also requires the preservation of the site in perpetuity by the Homeowners' Association for the project. The implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce impacts to less than significant levels (see Draft EIR, at pp. 4.4-12 — 4.4-13). Impacts to Archaeological Resources. Implementation of the proposed project will result in potentially significant impacts to archaeological resources, including Sites 33-00193, 33-001715, and 33-009545, termed the "Coral Mountain Rock Art Complex." Construction of the project will involve ground -disturbing activities with the potential to unearth unknown buried resources or adversely impact these known resources as well as previously unidentified archaeological historical resources. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts to archaeological resources, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: CUL-2: The presence of a qualified archaeologist shall be required during all project related ground disturbing activities, including clearing and grubbing. A monitoring plan shall be prepared and approved by the ACBCI and the City prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activity for all construction phases and activities. If potentially significant archaeological materials are discovered, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until the archaeologist can assess the significance of the find. CUL-3: An approved Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Native American Cultural Resource Monitor shall be present during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys) for the project. If potentially significant archaeological materials are discovered, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until the Tribal monitor can assess the significance of the find. CUL-4: Prior to ground disturbance during any phase of the project, cultural sensitivity training shall take place for all workers, conducted by the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO). CUL-5: Sites 33-00193, 33-001715, and 33-009545, along the base of Coral Mountain and at the toe of the slope, which contains the rock art panels and bedrock milling features, shall be avoided and protected in situ during project construction through the establishment of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Deed restrictions shall be recorded for the Environmentally Sensitive Areas and provided to the City prior to any ground disturbance of 36 570 any portion of Planning Area III. For the balance of Site 33-001715, where scattered artifacts but no features were found, mitigative surface collection and subsurface excavation shall be completed prior to ground disturbance to recover a representative sample of the cultural materials prior to the commencement of the project and as a condition of grading permit issuance. The excavation shall include a combination of standard archaeological units, shovel test pits, and backhoe trenches to optimize both efficient coverage of the site area and safe recovery of cultural remains. The survey protocols shall be approved by ACBCI and their approval provided to the City in writing prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activity on the site. Finding Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects on archaeological resources described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures CUL-2 through CUL-5, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: A total of eight sites and seven isolates are known to be present within or partially within the project boundary today. Only three sites constitute an archaeological and historical resource, which contain panels of rock art as well as milling features and ceramics contributory to the rock art panel areas (33-00193, 33-001715, and 33-009545). These sites are situated in proximity to one another along the eastern base of Coral Mountain and have been termed the "Coral Mountain Rock Art Complex". The Final EIR technical analysis determined that the sites are eligible for listing in the California Register. As a result, impacts to these sites resulting from development of the project would be considered significant and must be mitigated. To that end, mitigation measure CUL-5 assures fencing and delineation of the area prior to any development activity; the long-term protection of these sites, through prohibition of development, and the recordation of protective easements, as well as a program of research and documentation of the sites. For the balance of Site 33-001715, where scattered artifacts but no features were found, mitigative surface collection and subsurface excavation is required in mitigation measure CUL-5 to recover a representative sample of the cultural materials prior to the commencement of the project. In addition, mitigation measures CUL-2 and CUL-3 require monitoring on the site for all earth moving activities (including vegetation removal, grubbing, grading and excavation) by both an archaeological and Tribal monitor. These monitoring activities will provide further protection of 37 571 these resources and ensure that any previously undiscovered human remains or other historical or archaeological resources will be properly handled to avoid any significant effects. In addition, during Tribal consultation, the ACBCI requested further mitigation, which is provided in Section 4.13, Tribal Cultural Resources. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, impacts to significant cultural resources, including sites 33-00193, 33-001715, and 33-009545, will be reduced to less than significant levels (see Draft EIR, at pp. 4.4-14 — 4.4-15). Therefore, with implementation of mitigation measures CUL-1, CUL-2, CUL-3, CUL-4, and CUL-5, and the Mitigation Measures listed in Section 4.14, Tribal Cultural Resources, project - specific and cumulative effects on cultural resources will be less than significant (see Draft EIR, at pp. 4.4-16 — 4.4-18). Impacts to human remains. The project occurs in a highly sensitive area, and ground disturbing activities could result in the identification of additional resources, including previously unidentified cremations and human remains, and this is considered a potentially significant adverse effect. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts concerning the discovery of human remains, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: CUL-2: The presence of a qualified archaeologist shall be required during all project related ground disturbing activities, including clearing and grubbing. A monitoring plan shall be prepared and approved by the ACBCI and the City prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activity for all construction phases and activities. If potentially significant archaeological materials are discovered, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until the archaeologist can assess the significance of the find. CUL-3: An approved Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Native American Cultural Resource Monitor shall be present during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys) for the project. If potentially significant archaeological materials are discovered, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until the Tribal monitor can assess the significance of the find. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects concerning human 38 572 remains described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures CUL-2 and CUL-5, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and CEQA Guidelines 15064.5, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby areas reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent remains. Compliance with these legal requirements, along with implementation of mitigation measures CUL-2 and CUL-3, which require the presence of a qualified archaeologist and Native American resource monitors during all ground disturbing activities, will ensure that potential impacts relating to human remains will be less than significant. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Expose People or Structures to Effects Involving: Seismic -Related Ground Failure, including Liquefaction: Implementation of the proposed project has the potential for significant adverse effects associated with strong seismic ground shaking and seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, due to the active faults in the project vicinity and the fact that the southeastern portions of the City of La Quinta are considered highly and moderately susceptible to liquefaction. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GEO-1 All designs for any water body on the site shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and comply with all seismic codes in effect at the time they are constructed. All designs shall be based on and incorporate the recommendation of a qualified soils engineer in a site and water body specific report attached to the plans submitted to the City. GEO-2 All earthwork including excavation, backfill and preparation of the subgrade soil, shall be performed in accordance with the geotechnical recommendations, presented below, and portions of the local regulatory requirements, as applicable. All earthwork should be performed under the observation and testing of a qualified soil engineer. The following 39 573 geotechnical engineering recommendations for the proposed project are based on observations from the field investigation program, laboratory testing and geotechnical engineering analyses. • Stripping: areas to be graded shall be cleared of the vegetation, associated root systems and debris. All areas scheduled to receive fill should be cleared of old fills and any irreducible matter. The stripping shall be removed off -sit or stockpiled for later use in landscape areas. Undocumented fill soil or loose soil shall be removed in its entirety and replaced as engineered fill. Voids left by obstruction shall be properly backfilled in accordance with the compaction recommendations of this report. • Preparation of the Residential Building Areas: in order to provide firm and uniform foundation bearing conditions, the primary foundation bearing soil shall be over -excavated and recompacted. Over -excavation shall extend to a minimum depth of 3 feet below existing grade or 3 feet blow the bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper. Once adequate removals have been verified, the exposed native soil shall be scarified, the moisture -conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. • Preparation of the Hotel Building: In order to provide firm and uniform foundation bearing conditions, over -excavation and re - compaction through the building and foundation area shall be required as recommended by the Project Soils engineer and as directed by the City. All artificial fill soil and low density near surface native soil shall be removed to a depth of at least 4 feet below existing grade or 4 feet below the bottom of the footings, whichever is greater. Remedial grading shall extend laterally, a minimum of five feet beyond the building perimeter. The exposed surface shall then be scarified, the moisture conditioned to within two percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. • Compaction: Soil to be used as engineered fill should be free of organic material, debris and other deleterious substances, and shall not contain irreducible matter greater than six (6) inches in maximum dimension. All fill materials shall be placed in thin lifts not exceeding six inches in a loose condition. If import fill is required, the material shall be of a non -expansive nature and shall meet the following criteria: Plastic Index Less than 12 Liquid Limit Less than 35 Percent Soil Passing #200 Sieve Between 15% and 35% Maximum Aggregate Size 3 Inches The subgrade and all fill material shall be compacted with acceptable compaction equipment, to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The bottom of the exposed subgrade shall be observed by a representative of 574 Sladden Engineering prior to fill placement. Compaction testing shall be performed on all lifts in order to verify proper placement of the fill materials. • Shrinkage and Subsidence: Volumetric shrinkage of the material that is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill shall be anticipated. It is estimated that shrinkage could vary from 10 percent to 25 percent. Subsidence of the surfaces that are scarified and compacted shall be between 1 and 3 tenths of a foot. This will vary depending upon the type of equipment used, the moisture content of the soil at the time of grading and the actual degree of compaction attained. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures GEO-1 and GEO-2, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The Wave Basin design will incorporate the necessary structural concrete design features to handle the pressure and drainage associated with the wave generation. This is identified as Mitigation Measure GEO-1. Through this design, water intrusion generated by seismic events will be properly mitigated and contained to prevent seismic -related ground failure. Since the project site is potentially susceptible to liquefaction, the project site will be required to comply with the site preparation and foundation recommendations listed in the project -specific Geotechnical Investigation in order to ensure project safety as set forth in Mitigation Measure GEO-2. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2, and State building standards, impacts of seismic related ground failure at the project will be reduced to less than significant. Please also see Responses 22-h, 42-g, 86-a, and 86-b, which are hereby incorporated into the City Council's findings, analysis and conclusions. Located on an Unstable Geologic Unit or Expansive Soil The native materials on the project site consist primarily of silty sand and sandy silt, with minor portions of clay. While the project geotechnical evaluation determined that the project soils have a very -low to medium potential for expansion, development of homes and other project components on the project site could potentially expose persons and property to substantial damage and harm, which is considered a potentially significant adverse effect. 41 575 Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with development on an unstable geologic unit or expansive soil, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GEO-1 All designs for any water body on the site shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and comply with all seismic codes in effect at the time they are constructed. All designs shall be based on and incorporate the recommendation of a qualified soils engineer in a site and water body specific report attached to the plans submitted to the City. GEO-2 All earthwork including excavation, backfill and preparation of the subgrade soil, shall be performed in accordance with the geotechnical recommendations, presented below, and portions of the local regulatory requirements, as applicable. All earthwork should be performed under the observation and testing of a qualified soil engineer. The following geotechnical engineering recommendations for the proposed project are based on observations from the field investigation program, laboratory testing and geotechnical engineering analyses. • Stripping: areas to be graded shall be cleared of the vegetation, associated root systems and debris. All areas scheduled to receive fill should be cleared of old fills and any irreducible matter. The stripping shall be removed off -sit or stockpiled for later use in landscape areas. Undocumented fill soil or loose soil shall be removed in its entirety and replaced as engineered fill. Voids left by obstruction shall be properly backfilled in accordance with the compaction recommendations of this report. • Preparation of the Residential Building Areas: in order to provide firm and uniform foundation bearing conditions, the primary foundation bearing soil shall be over -excavated and recompacted. Over -excavation shall extend to a minimum depth of 3 feet below existing grade or 3 feet blow the bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper. Once adequate removals have been verified, the exposed native soil shall be scarified, the moisture -conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. • Preparation of the Hotel Building: In order to provide firm and uniform foundation bearing conditions, over -excavation and re - compaction through the building and foundation area shall be required as recommended by the Project Soils engineer and as directed by the City. All artificial fill soil and low density near surface native soil shall be removed to a depth of at least 4 feet below existing grade or 4 feet below the bottom of the footings, whichever is greater. Remedial grading shall extend laterally, a minimum of five feet beyond the building perimeter. The exposed surface shall then be scarified, the 42 576 moisture conditioned to within two percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Compaction: Soil to be used as engineered fill should be free of organic material, debris and other deleterious substances, and shall not contain irreducible matter greater than six (6) inches in maximum dimension. All fill materials shall be placed in thin lifts not exceeding six inches in a loose condition. If import fill is required, the material shall be of a non -expansive nature and shall meet the following criteria: Plastic Index Less than 12 Liquid Limit Less than 35 Percent Soil Passing #200 Sieve Between 15% and 35% Maximum Aggregate Size 3 Inches The subgrade and all fill material shall be compacted with acceptable compaction equipment, to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The bottom of the exposed subgrade shall be observed by a representative of Sladden Engineering prior to fill placement. Compaction testing shall be performed on all lifts in order to verify proper placement of the fill materials. Shrinkage and Subsidence: Volumetric shrinkage of the material that is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill shall be anticipated. It is estimated that shrinkage could vary from 10 percent to 25 percent. Subsidence of the surfaces that are scarified and compacted shall be between 1 and 3 tenths of a foot. This will vary depending upon the type of equipment used, the moisture content of the soil at the time of grading and the actual degree of compaction attained. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to development on an unstable geologic unit or expansive soil described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures GEO-1 and GEO-2, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. 43 577 Facts in Support of Finding: Since the project site is being developed on a site with potentially unstable or expansive soils. The project site will be required to comply with the current California Building Code (CBC) standards, City requirements, and the site preparation and foundation recommendations listed in the project - specific Geotechnical Investigation in order to ensure the proper removal and recompaction of undocumented fill and unstable or expansive soils, as required by Mitigation Measure GEO-2. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2, and compliance with State building standards, impacts from potentially unstable or expansive soils at the project will be reduced to less than significant. Please also see Responses 22-h, 42-g, 86-a, and 86-b, which are hereby incorporated into the City Council's findings, analysis and conclusions. Impacts to a Unique Paleontological Resource, Site or Unique Geologic Feature The project specific paleontological report included both a records search and field surveys, and while no significant resources were found, the report concluded that significant fossil vertebrate remains could be encountered during deeper excavations into subsurface lakebed sediments from Holocene Lake Cahuilla, which are considered to be of high paleontological sensitivity. This is considered a potentially significant adverse effect. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects on a unique paleontological resource, site or geologic feature, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GEO-3 All earth -moving operations reaching beyond the depth of two feet shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor and continuous monitoring will become necessary if undisturbed, potentially fossiliferous lakebed sediments are encountered. The monitor shall be empowered to stop earth moving activities if fossils are identified. The monitor shall be prepared to quickly salvage fossils, but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for removal of abundant or large specimens. A monitoring plan shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any earth moving permit, or the disturbance of any soils on the site, which will include: • Samples of sediments shall be collected and processed to recover small fossil remains. • Recovered specimens shall be identified and curated at a repositoiy with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for further research in the future. • A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance when appropriate, shall 578 be prepared upon completion of the research procedures outlined above. The report shall be provided to the City within 30 days of the conclusion of monitoring activities. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for the significant effects relating to paleontological resources described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measure GEO-3, as recommended in the Final EIR, which has been adopted by the City and is enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: In order to reduce impacts to paleontological resources encountered at depth on the project site, Mitigation Measure GEO-3 requires all earthmoving operations reaching beyond the depth of two feet to be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor and continuous monitoring will become necessary if undisturbed, potentially fossiliferous lakebed sediments are encountered. With implementation of this mitigation measure, impacts associated with fossils on the project site will be less than significant. Based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that all potentially significant project -specific and cumulative impacts will be mitigated to below a level of significance through implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3. NOISE Consistency with Established Noise Standards/Increases in Ambient Noise Levels. As analyzed in the Final EIR, the project will generate short-term construction noise and long- term increases in traffic noise and operational noise, including from the proposed Wave Basin. These increases in noise would be considered a significant adverse effect if they exceed the City's established noise standards. The City's Municipal Code establishes a daytime exterior noise standard of 65 dBA CNEL near sensitive receptors, including residential communities. The City also considers increases in existing ambient noise levels to be significant if they exceed 1.5 dBA where ambient noise levels already exceed 65 dBA, exceed 3 dBA where ambient noise levels are between 60 dBA and 65 dBA, or exceed 5 dBA where existing noise levels are less than 60 dBA. For construction noise, the City has established a significance threshold of 85 dBA, consistent with the National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (See Draft EIR at pp. 4.11-18 — 4.11-21). 45 579 Construction of the proposed project would generate short-term increases in noise, which would be considered a significant impact if these noise increases exceed the City's significance threshold. While the noise study determined that construction noise levels would not exceed the 85 dBA threshold at any nearby receptors, including future project residents (see Draft EIR Tables 4.11- 15 and 4.11-16), it identifies Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through NOI-4 to reduce construction noise. The project will not generate operational noise levels that exceed the City's noise 65 dBA noise standard or have any significant impact on any sensitive receptors, including residents in the surrounding communities. In addition, operational noise levels will not cause any substantial increases in ambient noise levels in excess of the significance thresholds specified above. However, off -site traffic generates traffic noise on the project site that could expose future project residents to noise levels that exceed the City's noise standard of 65 dBA. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project specific and cumulative effects relating to noise, and to further minimize any noise increases for existing residents in the project vicinity, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: NOI-1 Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that project construction activities shall comply with the City of La Quinta Municipal Code requirements. NOI-2 During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with property operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. NOI-3 The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the project site during all project construction (i.e., to the center). NOI-4 The contractor shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck -related noise. NOI-5 A six-foot perimeter wall will be developed along the northern and eastern property boundaries, adjacent to the proposed Low Density Residential Planning Area (PA II), in order to protect the proposed onsite residential uses from off -site traffic noise. The barriers shall provide a weight of at least four pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line - of -sight openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or 46 decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. NOI-6 The operation of the Wave Basin and associated Wave machines shall be limited to the daytime and evening hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., compliant with the recreational operational hours allowed by the City of La Quinta. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to noise described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures NOI-1 through NOI-6, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Construction of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts. While construction activities will create temporarily high noise levels in the immediate vicinity of the equipment, noise will not exceed the 85 dBA standard established by the National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) identified by the City as the threshold of significance for noise impacts from construction activities. The highest construction noise levels at the nearby sensitive receptors (residences) are projected to range from 58 dBA to 76.5 dBA, which are well below the established threshold of significance (Draft EIR, Table 4.11-15). Additionally, the City of La Quinta established construction hours of operation to lessen the impacts of construction noise (see Draft EIR, Table 4.11-2). Although the project will not result in significant construction noise impacts, the project will be required to implement mitigation measures NOI-1 through NOI-4, to further reduce and minimize the generation of construction noise. The Noise Study analyzed operational noise generated by the proposed project, including off -site and on -site traffic noise generated by project -related increases in vehicular traffic, noise generated by the proposed special events, and noise generated by the Wave Basin. Measurements of existing noise levels at various locations were conducted in proximity to the proposed project. The ten locations where measurements were collected were chosen to represent noise sensitive areas, such as nearby residential properties. Traffic Noise: The project will generate a noise level increase of less than 3.0 dBA CNEL in all study area roadway segments except for segment 27 (Avenue 60 west of Madison Street), which will experience and increase of up to 3.2 dBA CNEL (Draft EIR, Tables 4.11-17, 4.11-18, and 4.11-19). Based on the significance criteria, the project -related noise level increases are considered less than significant under existing, plus ambient growth, plus cumulative development 47 581 in buildout year 2026 (EAC 2026) with project conditions at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying project traffic, because all but one segment (Avenue 60, west of Madison St.) experience increases of less than 3.0 dBA CNEL. While the segment of Avenue 60 west of Madison Street will experience an increase in roadway noise of 3.2 dBA under existing plus ambient and cumulative conditions, this increase does not exceed the established threshold of significance of a 5 dBA or greater increase in areas with ambient noise levels below 60 dBA (Draft EIR, Table 4.11-8). Therefore, offsite traffic would result in less than significant levels. Off -site traffic also generates traffic noise on the project site; therefore, six-foot perimeter walls will be developed along the existing rights -of -way and adjacent to the proposed Low Density Residential Planning Area (PA II) (Mitigation Measure NOI-5). While this is not considered a significant impact under CEQA under the California Supreme Court decision in California Building Industry Assn. Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4' 369, 392), implementation of mitigation measure NOI-5 and standard building construction and windows, will ensure that future project residents will not be exposed to interior or exterior noise levels that exceeds the City's established limits (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.11-42 — 4.11-43). Special Events: Noise generated by off -site traffic during the proposed special events was also analyzed in the Noise Study (see Draft EIR Table 4.11-20). The Noise Study projects that off -site roadway noise levels during special event conditions will range from 60.5 to 73.9 dBA CNEL, and will result in a noise level increases of 1.5 dBA or less at all sensitive receptor locations (excluding segment 27 described above, which will experience an increase of 3.2 dBA). Based on the significance criteria, the project -related roadway noise level increases are considered to be less than significant under the project with special events condition at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying project traffic. Operational Noise: In addition to construction noise and off -site traffic noise, the Draft EIR (and the Noise Study and supplemental Noise Memo prepared by Urban Crossroads attached as Appendix K.1 and K.2 to the DEIR) analyzed operational noise impacts generated by the proposed project. Operational activities analyzed included activities associated with use of the Wave Basin, outdoor pool/spa activities, outdoor activities, and activities at the neighborhood commercial center. The operational noise levels that would be experienced at the sensitive receptor locations range from 39.8 dBA to 52.2 dBA, and the increase in ambient noise levels range from 0.0 dBA to 0.9 dBA at all locations except location R8 (the closest adjacent residence), which will increase 4.9 dBA, from 43.8 dBA to 48.7 dBA, which is still substantially below the City's outdoor noise standard of 65 dBA (Draft EIR, Tables 4.11-25 and 4.11-26). The Wave Basin proposed in the 48equiret will use the same technology and equipment and, for this reason, noise measurements were collected at the existing Wave Basin in Lemoore, California, and used in the analysis of the noise levels that would be generated by the Wave Basin included in the project. These measurements included ten wave events, measured at eight different locations, over a period of 53 minutes. The reference noise levels indicate that during peak wave events, the Wave Basin generates noise levels ranging from 62.6 dBA Leq at the end of the Wave Basin, 73.8 dBA Leq in the lifeguard tower and 75.7 dBA Leq near the cable roller system. To describe the worst -case reference noise level conditions, the highest reference noise level describing each peak wave noise event of 75.7 dBA Leq at a distance of 12 feet was used in the 48 582 analysis Draft EIR, pp. 4.11-45 — 4.11-46. The referenced noise level measurements included all sources of noise associated with the Wave Basin in Lemoore, including loudspeaker announcements, noise generated from the waves and associated machinery and use of jet skis in the basin (See Final EIR, Appendix K.3). These noise levels taken at the noise source were input into the noise modelling software used by Urban Crossroads, CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement), which is a three-dimensional noise model that analyzes multiple types of noise sources using the spatially accurate project site plan, georeferenced Nearmap aerial imagery, topography, buildings, and barriers in its calculations to predict outdoor noise levels at the selected receptor locations (see Noise Study, pp. 73-74, at Draft EIR Appendix K.2). As shown on Table 4.11-26 in the Draft EIR, the operational noise levels at noise sensitive receptors ranged from 39.8 dBA to 52.2 dBA, and cause increases in ambient noise levels of less than 1.0 dBA at all but one location. In location R8, approximately 38 feet from the project site and south of Avenue 60, the ambient noise level would increase from 43.8 dBA to 48.7 dBA, which remains substantially below the City's established standard of 65. dBA (and the increase is below the applicable standard of 5.0 dBA) (see Draft EIR, pp. 4.11-47 — 4.11-49. On the specific issue of whether significant noise levels will be amplified by bouncing off Coral Mountain, the FEIR notes that based on Federal Highway Administration studies and guidance, if all noise striking a hard surface were reflected back to a given receiving point, the maximum increase in noise would be limited to 3dBA. However, not all acoustical energy is reflected back to the same point, and accordingly, FHWA measurements show that reflective noise increases do not exceed 1-2 dBA, which is not perceptible to the human ear (see Final EIR, at pp. 2-31 — 2-32, and Appendix K.2 to the Draft EIR). The City Council accepts and agrees with this expert analysis of potential noise impacts, and also adopts and incorporates by reference the analysis and conclusions set forth in Responses 52-h, 59-e, and 62-f in the Final EIR. The City Council also accepts and agrees with the supplemental noise memoranda submitted by Meridian Consultants (April 25, 2022) and Urban Crossroads (April 26, 2022), addressing noise -related comments made during the public hearings, and find that these memoranda further confirm that the project will not have any significant noise impacts on the surrounding communities. TRANSPORTATION Consistency with an Applicable Plan or Policy Addressing the Circulation System. The proposed project would add traffic to area roadways that could result in significant changes in the level of service at area intersections and thus potentially conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, which is considered a potentially significant adverse effect. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project specific and cumulative effects relating to traffic and transportation, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: EEG 583 TRA-1 The project proponent shall contribute DIF as required by the City of La Quinta. TRA-2 The project proponent shall contribute TUMF traffic impact mitigation fees prior to the issuance of Building Permits. TRA-9 If Special Events are to take place prior to the completion of Phase 3 construction, Phase 3 typical operations traffic improvements will be completed or the applicant shall provide a focused traffic analysis with the Temporary Use Permit that identifies any improvements that are not necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service at study intersections. If the analysis does not demonstrate acceptable operations, the TUP will be denied TRA-10 If Special Events are to take place prior to the construction of Phase 3, a special event traffic and parking plan will be submitted with each Temporary Use Permit to ensure that special events will not cause any significant traffic or parking impacts. If the analysis does not demonstrate acceptable operations, the TUP will be denied TRA-II Traffic Management Plans will be submitted to the City and the Police Department for review and approval prior to special events. Timing for installation of traffic management measures will be scaled to the size and duration of the event. In general, signage for large events should be in place five days prior and two days following special events. The City and Police Department may impose additional measures if determined to be necessary. Individual management plans for specific special events shall be submitted at least 30 days prior to the start of the event. The special event Traffic Management Plans shall include the measures identified in Mitigation Measures TRA-12 through TRA-14 below. TRA-12 In developing the Special Event Traffic Management Plan, the project proponent shall include the use of Portable changeable message signs (CMS) or moveable mechanical electronic message boards. CMS will be located at critical locations identified by the La Quinta Police Department (LQPD) and in place 5 days ahead of the event and 2 days after. TRA-13 In developing the Special Event Traffic Management Plan the project proponent shall include the use of law enforcement personnel and/or special event flaggers to direct traffic in locations reviewed and approved by the City and Police Department. TRA-14 In developing the Special Event Traffic Management Plan the project proponent shall include the use of public service announcements (PSA) to provide information to event guests and surrounding neighborhoods prior to the event. Examples include online event information, brochures and 50 changeable message signs that include details such as suggested routes, drop-off and parking facility locations. TRA-15 The project proponent shall ensure that the proposed Coral Mountain Interpretive Center trail designated by the Desert Recreation District Master Plan and associated with the future Coral Mountain Interpretive Center is incorporated into project plans. Accommodations for this trail shall be located along the approximate toe of Coral Mountain, within the designated conservation area at the southwestern edge of the property. Conditions of Approval: The project shall be conditioned to construct the following roadway improvements as identified in the Final EIR, which will be enforceable through both the conditions of approval and the Development Agreement: Phase 1 Improvements: Improvements to Avenue 58, Madison Street, Avenue 60, and project access points, and the project's fair share contributions toward planned traffic signals and related improvements at 5 area intersections as identified in Table 4.13-20 (see pages 4.13-29 — 4.13-33 of Draft EIR). Phase 2 Improvements: Increased fair share contributions toward planned traffic signals and related improvements at 6 area intersections as identified in Table 4.13-22 (see pages 4.13-34 — 4.13-37 of Draft EIR). Phase 3 Improvements: Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Madison St. and Avenue 58 and increased fair share contributions toward planned traffic signals at nine other intersections as identified in table 4,13-24 (see pages 4.13-37 — 4.13-41 of the Draft EIR). Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to traffic and transportation described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures TRA-1, TRA-2, TRA-9 through TRA-15, and construction of the conditioned traffic improvements described above, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, Specific Plan, MMRP, and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: 51 585 Project Operations: Traffic related to project activities (both construction and operational) were analyzed in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) Evaluation (Draft EIR, Appendices L.1 and L.2). The TIA was prepared in accordance with the City of La Quinta's Traffic Study Guidelines (Engineering Bulletin #06-13, dated July 23, 2015) and Engineering Bulletin #10-01, dated August 9, 2010, the City General Plan, and a traffic study scope reviewed and approved by City staff during the scoping process. The project will be gated and private, with the exception of the neighborhood commercial project at the northeast corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The Wave Basin facility will be utilized by hotel guests, but outside trip generation was also included for employee trips at the hotel, resort commercial, and Wave Basin. Area residents and visitors will use the commercial retail area located in the northeast corner of the project, which will not be restricted to project residents and hotel guests. At project buildout, the site is anticipated to generate a net total of 6,994 external trip -ends per day on a typical weekday with 447 external vehicles per hour (VPH) during the weekday AM peals hour and 638 external VPH during the weekday PM peak hour. Under build out conditions, nine study area intersections will be impacted without the development of the project. The addition of the project will result in a total often impacted intersections under build out ("Phase 3") conditions. For Phase 3 traffic conditions, eight study area intersections are anticipated to require installation of a traffic signal in order to maintain acceptable level of service (LOS). Project and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) improvements will result in acceptable LOS for all intersections. Mitigation measure TRA-1 requires payment of the City's DIF, which funds the traffic improvements in the CIP program, which will result in less than significant impacts at all area intersections. In addition, all study roadway segments analyzed are anticipated to operate at acceptable volume -to -capacity ratio of 0.90 or less at buildout. The County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) 52equirees a LOS E or better for regional roadways. The generation, distribution, and management of project traffic is not expected to conflict with the CMP; no CMP roadways occur in the vicinity of the project. The project and background traffic will not exceed City level of service standards or travel demand measures, or other standards established by the City or Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) for designated roads or highways. Following the payment of required fees such as TUMF and DIF, as required under mitigation measures TRA-1 and TRA-2, less than significant impacts are anticipated relative to the CMP. Special Events: The applicant anticipates the potential occurrence of multi -day special events at this location involving attendance of not -to -exceed 2,500 guests per day. Any event occurring prior to the build out of the project, and concurrent roadway improvements and traffic signal installations, could result in a significant impact on traffic operations. Therefore, if project special events are held prior to the construction of Phase 3 improvements, Mitigation Measures TRA-9 and TRA-10 condition issuance of the required Temporary Use Permit on (1) completion of the required improvements or, alternatively, a focused traffic analysis demonstrating that any required improvements that have not been completed are not necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service in all locations, and (2) a special event traffic and parking plan demonstrating that the special events will not cause any significant traffic or parking impacts. 52 In addition, Mitigation Measure TRA-11, requires City and Police Department approval of a Special Event Traffic Management Plan prior to issuance of a Temporary Use Permit for any special events (whether or not the Phase 3 traffic improvements have been completed). Timing for installation of traffic management measures will be scaled to the size and duration of the event to ensure that the special events will not have any significant adverse effects. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified above, all project entries and other facilities were determined to be adequate for special event conditions, and the impacts associated with special events will be reduced to less than significant levels. Also see Final EIR Responses 52-n, 52-p, 83-h, and 90-e, which are hereby adopted and incorporated into the City Council's findings, analysis and conclusions. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: Interior to the project, Project Design Features (PDF) are incorporated that encourage the use of alternative transportation measures including pedestrian and bicycle travel. The project will provide a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site. The proposed project Is not anticipated to result in significant impacts to existing bike lanes. Temporary impacts may occur during construction; however, any bicycle access adjacent to the project will be restored to existing conditions. Accordingly, the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan Update 2035 with respect to pedestrian and alternative transportation facilities. The Desert Recreation District Master Plan includes a proposed trail along the toe of Coral Mountain associated with the future Coral Mountain Interpretive Center. The proposed trail alignment falls within the project boundaries. As shown in Mitigation Measure TRA-15 project plans will include accommodations for this trail within the designated conservation area at the southwestern edge of the property to assure mitigation of.... Based on the foregoing, the project, including during special events, will not conflict with any applicable plans or policies addressing the circulation system, and will not have any project - specific or cumulative adverse effects on the roadways and intersections surrounding the project (see Final EIR, pp. 2-32 — 2-35 and Appendices L.2 and L.3; and Draft EIR, pp. 4.13-17 — 4.13- 51 and Appendices L.1). The City Council has reviewed the Draft EIR comments raising concerns about the project, including special events increasing traffic in the area, including Comment 22-j, Comments 83-e through 83-k and the August 3, 2021 letter from Minegar & Associates attached as Exhibit 2 to Comment letter 83, and Comment 90-d. The City finds that these comments contain inaccurate statements regarding the project and the traffic study (Draft EIR Appendices L.1 and L.2), and do not contain substantial evidence of any significant transportation effects that will not be mitigated to a level of less -than -significant, nor do they contain substantial evidence of any material inaccuracies in the project traffic study and analysis. Rather, the City Council finds the Final EIR Responses to these comments to be persuasive, and hereby adopts those responses and incorporates them into the City Council's findings, analysis and conclusions regarding potential transportation impacts (Final EIR Responses 22-j, 83-e through 83-k, and 90-d). The City Council also adopts 53 587 and incorporates by this reference Appendix L.3 to the Final EIR, which responds to each of the comments and issues raised the Minegar & Associates letter attached as Exhibit 2 to Comment letter 83. Effect of Geometric Design Features. The project has the potential to create traffic hazards if the line -of -sight from project entrances are inadequate, or if traffic queuing at project entrances exceeds the storage length of the applicable turn lanes. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential effects relating to traffic hazards, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: TRA-3 The project proponent shall ensure that streetscape improvement plans for the project frontage on Avenue 58, Madison Street and Avenue 60, are submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the initiation of landscape or roadway improvements. TRA-4 The project proponent shall ensure that clear unobstructed sight distances are provided at all site access points and internal intersections. Sight distances shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of landscape and street improvement plans. TRA-5 The project proponent shall ensure that final layout and site access design are subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer prior to final project approval. TRA-7 The project proponent shall ensure that traffic signing and striping plans shall be developed in conjunction with street improvement plans and submitted to the City of La Quinta for review and approval during the project approval process. TRA-8 The project proponent shall ensure that Construction Traffic Control Plans are reviewed and approved by the City prior to project construction. These plans are to be implemented during construction activities. Construction includes ofsite and offsite improvements. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to traffic and transportation hazards described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that 54 - all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures TRA-3 through TRA-5, TRA-7 and TRA-8, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, Specific Plan, MMRP, and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The project will be developed in accordance with design guidelines included in the Specific Plan and will not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature. As provided in Mitigation Measures TRA-3 and TRA-4, the project's access points will be located with adequate sight distances, which will be required to meet City standards. In addition, a queuing analysis was performed to ensure adequate turn lanes and stacking distances at all project entrances. The installation of site and landscape improvements will be required to avoid interfering with adequate sight distances. Project plans will be reviewed for any sight distance conflicts and will require approval by the City. As required in Mitigation Measures TRA-5 and TRA-7, the internal circulation system would provide adequate fire department access. Final layout and site access design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer as well as the Fire Department to ensure compliance with their established standards. As provided in Mitigation Measure TRA-8, Traffic Control Plans will be implemented during construction activities. These plans will reduce potential impacts that may arise due to conflicts with construction traffic, consistent with City standards. Accordingly, the project is not anticipated to increase hazards due to geometric design features or incompatible uses. Following implementation of the mitigation measures, as well as the City review and approval process for all improvement plans, impacts will be less than significant. Emergency Access. As the project will be a gated, private community (other than the neighborhood commercial area near Madison St. and Avenue 58), there is a potential for emergency access to be impeded by the access gates or other project features, and accordingly, this is considered a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project effects relating to emergency access, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: TRA-5 The project proponent shall ensure that final layout and site access design are subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer prior to final project approval. 55 :• TRA-6 The project proponent shall ensure that emergency police, fire and paramedic vehicle access are provided for the project prior to final project approval. TRA-7 The project proponent shall ensure that traffic signing and striping plans shall be developed in conjunction with street improvement plans and submitted to the City of La Quinta for review and approval during the project approval process. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to emergency access described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measure TRA-5 through TRA-7, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, Specific Plan, MMRP, and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: For gated projects, the Fire Department requires the installation of a Knox -Box Rapid Entry System or similar device to facilitate emergency access by fire fighters and other emergency first responders (Mitigation Measure TRA-6). The internal circulation system would provide adequate fire department access. Final layout and site access design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer as well as the Fire Department to ensure compliance with their established standards. (Mitigation Measures TRA-5 and TRA-7). Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in inadequate emergency access, and with mitigation, impacts will be less than significant. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Impacts to Significant Tribal Cultural Resources The proposed project could have a potentially significant impact on Tribal Cultural Resources within or near the project site. In particular, the project site and the adjacent Coral Mountain contain three sites that have been determined to constitute a significant archaeological and historical resource which are also a "Tribal Cultural Resource" as defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 (Sites 33-00193, 33-001715, and 33-009545). These three sites are situated along the eastern base of Coral Mountain and contain panels of rock art as well as other associated artifacts and features. These sites, known collectively as the "Coral Mountain Rock Art Complex," could be adversely affected by development of the Project. The project could also impact five other previously identified sites and seven isolates that were determined through Tribal 56 590 consultation to have significance to the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI). Additionally, construction of the project would involve ground -disturbing activities such as grading and surface excavation, with the potential to unearth or adversely impact other known or previously unidentified tribal cultural resources. These are considered significant adverse impacts. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project specific and cumulative effects relating to Tribal Cultural Resources, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: TCR-1: Before ground disturbing activities begin, the applicant shall contact the ACBCI Tribal Historic Preservation Office to arrange cultural monitoring. The project requires the presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt in the vicinity of the deposits, and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines), within 24 hours, to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. TCR-2: The presence of a qualified archaeologist shall be required during all project related ground disturbing activities, including clearing and grubbing. A monitoring plan shall be prepared and approved by the ACBCI and provided to the City prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activity for all construction phases and activities. If potentially significant archaeological materials are discovered, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until the archaeologist can assess the significance of the find. TCR-3: Before ground disturbing activities, the project's archaeologist shall prepare an Archaeological Treatment, Disposition, and Monitoring Plan to be submitted to the ACBCI Tribal Historic Preservation Office for approval. The Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plan shall be deemed rejected by ACBCI's Tribal Historic Preservation Office if no action to approve the plan is taken within 30 days from submission for approval. If the ACBCI Tribal Historic Preservation Office rejects two Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plans submitted for approval, the applicant may appeal the second denial to the La Quinta City Council for a final determination. The approved Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plan shall be provided to the City prior to any ground disturbance on the site. TCR-4: Before ground disturbing activities, the project's archaeologist shall prepare a Rock Art Management Plan, based on recommendations made in the report by McCarthy and Mouriquand, and shall submit the plan to the 57 591 ACBCI Tribal Historic Preservation Office for approval. The Rock Art Management Plan shall be deemed rejected by ACBCI's Tribal Historic Preservation Office if no action is taken to approve the plan within 30 days of submission for approval. If the ACBCI Historic Preservation Office rejects two Rock Art Management Plans submitted for approval, the applicant may appeal the second denial to the La Quinta City Council for a final determination. The approved Rock Art Management Plan shall be provided to the City prior to any ground disturbance on the site. TCR-5: Sites 33-00193, 33-001715, and 33-009545, along the base of Coral Mountain and at the toe of the slope, which contain the rock art panels and bedrock milling features, shall be avoided and protected in situ during project construction through the establishment of Environmentally Sensitive Areas; the Environmentally Sensitive Areas shall be recorded on the property, and proof of recordation shall be provided to the City prior to any ground disturbance in Planning Area III. Nominations of these sites to the National Register of Historic Places shall be filed with the appropriate federal agency prior to the issuance of the first grading permit; and the sites shall be subject to the provisions of the Rock Art Management Plan. TCR-6: For the portion of Site 33-001715 outside the preservation area established in TCR-5, mitigative surface collection and subsurface excavation shall be completed prior to any ground disturbance in Planning Area III to recover a representative sample of the cultural materials prior to the commencement of the project and as a condition of grading permit issuance. The excavation shall include a combination of standard archaeological units, shovel test pits, and backhoe trenches to optimize both efficient coverage of the site area and safe recovery of cultural remains. The survey protocols shall be approved by ACBCI. A report of findings, including written confirmation of completion to ACBCI's satisfaction, shall be provided to the City prior to ground disturbance. TCR-7: Prior to ground disturbance in Planning Area III, a qualified archaeologist shall complete surface collection, testing and excavation if necessary, for sites 33-1716, 33-1717, 33-8386, 33-9001, 33-9003, 33-28907, 33-28908, 33-28909, 33-28910, 33-28911, 33-28912. A report of findings including written confirmation of completion to ACBCI's satisfaction, shall be provided to the City prior to ground disturbance. TCR-8: A comprehensive recordation program shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist for Site 33-008388. The program shall contain detailed drawings and measurements to preserve the information on the adobe building. Such information would include the floor plan, elevations, building materials and their configurations, and any other notable structural and architectural details. The adobe remains and an appropriate buffer determined by the project archaeologist shall be flagged and cornered off 58 592 during all ground disturbance and preserved in place. Prior to the occupancy of any structure in Planning Area II, the adobe will be fenced off and an informational plaque describing the history of the ranch complex shall be provided, and the project proponent shall provide the City with the CC&Rs for the project area, demonstrating that the feature would be maintained in perpetuity by the project's Homeowners Association. Special attention should be given to the residence foundation, which, may be the remains of one of the earlier structures at the site, dating from 1920s or before. The footings and slabs at this location should be cleared and measured, and attempts should be made to locate the original trash pits or privies which could contain valuable artifacts revealing much about life in the harsh environment at such an early date. The scatter of artifacts has the greatest number of pre-1925 artifacts, mostly in the form of sun -colored glass, but also in brown and olive glass, porcelain, ceramics and more. There may be remains of an early structure near this point, hidden amidst the broad stand of tamarisk trees, an original windbreak. Search of these remains is required to ensure the most complete recovery possible Of the early 20rh century artifacts and features. Photos, measurements, and artifacts shall be catalogued, analyzed, reported, and curated at the Coachella Valley Museum (Love et al. 1998:54). TCR-9: The applicant shall coordinate with ACBCI Tribal Historic Preservation Office to ensure there are a sufficient number of Native American monitors for the number of earth -moving machinery for each phase of development. The applicant shall provide the City with fully executed monitoring agreements prior to each phase of ground disturbing activity. TCR-10: Should human remains be inadvertently discovered during ground disturbance, the provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 shall be followed. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site of the remains, or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent remains, until the County Coroner has examined the remains. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24-hours. TCR-11: Prior to any ground disturbance, the applicant shall sign a curation agreement with the ACBCI THPO. A fully executed copy of the agreement shall be provided to the City. TCR-12: Prior to any ground disturbance, cultural sensitivity training shall take place for all contractors with the staff at the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO). 59 593 Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to Tribal Cultural Resources described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of mitigation measures TCR-1 through TCR-12, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, Specific Plan, MMRP, and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The City of La Quinta initiated and completed Tribal consultation as required under SB 18 and AB 52. The ACBCI requested consultation, which was conducted between February 2020 and June 2020. During consultation, ACBCI indicated that the Coral Mountain Rock Art Complex is especially important, and the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) requested that this area be avoided and preserved. Mitigation Measure TCR-5 will ensure that the sites are avoided and protected in situ during any development activity through the establishment of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. To provide long term protection of these sites, Mitigation Measures TCR-5 and TCR-6 require prohibition of development and the recordation of protective easements, as well as a program of research and documentation of the sites. For the balance of one of the sites, where scattered artifacts but no features were found, mitigative surface collection and subsurface excavation is required to recover a representative sample of the cultural materials prior to the commencement of the project (Mitigation Measure TCR-6). In addition, the project's archaeologist will be required to prepare an Archaeological Treatment, Disposition, and Monitoring Plan and a Rock Art Management Plan prior to ground disturbing activities. Both plans are to be submitted to the ACBCI THPO for approval, and once approved provided to the City (Mitigation Measures TCR-3 and TCR-4). Mitigation Measures TCR-3 through TCR-7 will mitigate potential disturbance of the Coral Mountain Rock Art Complex less than significant level. The project archaeologist determined that the remaining five of the eight previously identified cultural resource sites and all seven isolates, recorded within or partially within the current project area, do not constitute a unique archaeological resource or an historical resource. During Tribal consultation, however, the ACBCI disagreed. Based on their resource inventories, and the breadth and significance of resources identified in and surrounding the project site, the area is considered significant to the Tribe. The Tribe requested further surface investigation, testing, and excavation if necessary, of these sites and isolates to assure that impacts to Tribal resources in the area are not significant. In order to assure that the impact is reduced to less than significant levels, Mitigation Measure TCR-7 requires a qualified archaeologist to complete surface collection, testing and excavation if necessary, for the sites. A report of findings, including written confirmation of completion to ACBCI's reasonable satisfaction, shall be provided to the City prior to ground disturbance. 60 594 Since the project is located within the ACBCI's Tribal Traditional Use Area and the Tribe's records indicate that Tribal cultural resources are located within the project area, cultural monitoring, including an ACBCI monitor, is required to address the Tribe's concern for the presence of Tribal cultural resources (Mitigation Measure TCR-I). In addition, TCR-2 and TCR- 9 require monitoring on the site for all earth moving activities (including vegetation removal, grubbing, grading and excavation) by both archaeological and Tribal monitors. These monitoring activities will provide further protection of these resources. In addition, as described above concerning Cultural Resources, most of the project area had been developed by the 20th century into an agricultural business known in the 1950s as the Coral Reef Ranch. At least four buildings were present on the landholdings of the ranch, all clustered on the northern edge of the project area. The remains of the ranch complex, including the partially collapsed adobe house, have been recorded into the California Historical Resources Inventory. The ranch complex has historic significance and although ACBCI stated that this site is not significant to Tribal history, it has significance to the region's early farming traditions. Significant adverse effects to this resource are avoided through mitigation measure TCR-8 and mitigation measure CUL-1 (described above concerning Cultural Resources). California law requires the protection of historic —era and Native American human burials, cremations, skeletal remains and items associated with Native American interments from vandalism and inadvertent destruction. Mitigation Measure TCR-10 provides for this with the implementation of State law relating to human remains. To further protect resources that may be uncovered during project development, Mitigation Measures TCR-1I and TCR-12 will require a standard curation agreement with the ACBCI and construction worker sensitivity training during all aspects and phases of project construction. Together, these mitigation measures will assure that impacts to Tribal resources unearthed during all phases of project construction will be reduced to less than significant levels. For the reasons set forth above, with the implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-I through TCR-12, impacts to Tribal Resources will be reduced to less than significant levels. IV. FINDINGS REGARDING IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT The Final EIR also determined, based upon substantial evidence in the record, the following impacts associated with the project are less than significant and no mitigation is required. The City hereby adopts the findings, analysis, and conclusions regarding these potential impacts set forth in the Final EIR, and incorporates the same herein by this reference. AESTHETICS Effects to the Visual Character or Quality of the Site. The project will change the visual character of the site from a former ranch site and largely undeveloped desert open space to a developed resort residential and mixed -use project. Finding: 61 595 The City Council finds that the project fits with the resort residential community character of this portion of the City, and through compliance with the design guidelines in the Specific Plan and the applicable City requirements, the project's effects relating to the visual character and quality of the site will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Facts in Support of Finding: All proposed development within the project area is required to be cohesive and complementary to the adjacent land uses by incorporating improvements such as landscaping and block walls along the perimeter of the project. The project will comply with the City standards and guidelines regarding building heights in Image Corridors within 150 feet of Avenue 58 and Madison Street, as required by the La Quinta Municipal Code, in order to reduce impacts to scenic resources, Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains. In addition, the project's perimeter landscaping, block wall, and the entry points will be similar in appearance and quality to the existing communities to the north, east, and south. Likewise, the majority of the project's perimeter areas will be developed with low -density residential uses, consistent with surrounding communities (Draft EIR at p. 4.1- 48). The residential and resort uses within the project will be subject to the regulations outlined within the Specific Plan and will be consistent with the prevailing desert-themed architectural styles of other resort and residential developments in the City, including the gated residential communities to the north, Andalusia Country Club to the east, and gated residential communities to the south (Draft EIR at pp. 4.1-48 — 4.1-51). The neighborhood commercial uses at the corner of Madison St. and Avenue 58 will also comply with the City's Municipal Code height requirements for commercial buildings and will not result in any significant impacts to visual character or scenic quality (Draft EIR at pp. 4.1-51 — 4.1-53). The Wave Basin, resort hotel, and other uses in the project's Tourist Commercial planning area are located in the southwest portion of the project site and will not be readily visible from the perimeter of the project or other off -site locations (See Draft EIR line -of -sight and visual simulations, Exhibits 4.1-4 — 4.1-13). Based on the foregoing, the project will be consistent and compatible with the visual character and quality of the project site and surrounding communities and will not have any significant effects. AIR QUALITY Consistency with implementation of applicable air quality plans and standards. California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. The project site is located within Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) and is subject to SCAQMB's 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. In addition, the City enacted its Fugitive Dust Control ordinance in Chapter 6.16 of the Municipal Code to ensure construction projects comply with SCAQMD Rules 403 and 403.1. Violations of, or inconsistencies with implementation of the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan or the City's Fugitive Dust Control ordinance would constitute a significant adverse effect. 62 596 Create obiectionable odors The project does not include any of the land uses generally associated with odor complaints; the low density residential, open space recreational, tourist commercial, wave basin, and general commercial uses associated with the project are not expected to operate in a manner resulting in other emissions leading to objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) associated with the proposed project's (long-term operational) uses. Finding: The City Council finds that the project is consistent with all applicable air quality plans and will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or contribute to a new violation, and accordingly, impacts will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. The City Council further finds that the project's odor related impacts will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Facts in Support of Finding: The project would not exceed the applicable regional significance thresholds or localized significance thresholds (LST) for construction activity after implementation of the Best Available Control Methods (BACM AQ-1, AQ-2, and AQ-3) listed above (Draft EIR at pp. 4.1-15 — 4.1- 18)1. In addition, the project's operational emissions would not exceed the applicable regional significance thresholds or LST (Draft EIR at pp. 4.1.16 — 4.1-18, and Table 4.2-8 and 4.2-13). In addition, the project is consistent with the growth projections included in the 2016 AQMD. Accordingly, the project is consistent with all applicable air quality plans, including SCAQMD's 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. Construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and are thus considered less than significant. It is expected that project -generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City's solid waste regulations. The proposed project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed project construction and operations would be less than significant. i Pages 1 — 34 of the Air Quality Chapter of the Draft EIR (Chapter 4.2) were inadvertently mis-nuinbered as pages 4.1-1 through 4.1-34, instead of 4.2-1 through 4.2-34. 63 597 ENERGY Consumption of Energy Resources. The project construction activities will consume energy resources, primarily in the form of petroleum and electricity. However, there are no unusual project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable construction activities, or that would violate current emissions standards (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.5-20 — 4.5-25), and therefore, construction -related impacts would be less than significant. The project would increase demand for energy in the project area, including electricity, natural gas, and petroleum, and is located within the service areas of (Imperial Irrigation District) IID and SoCal Gas Company. The project would not, however, include wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of these energy resources. The project proposes a complimentary mix of uses that will reduce vehicle miles traveled, and thus reduces the consumption of petroleum projects for vehicle use. In addition, the project includes energy efficiency measures that will reduce the consumption of electricity, including energy efficient windows, roof systems, electrical lighting systems, and HVAC systems, and will be compliant with Title 24 energy efficiency requirements. Consistency with a State or Local Plan for Renewable Energy or Enemy Efficiency. The project is subject to CALGreen Building Codes and Title 24 codes and standards for both residential and nonresidential components of the project, as well as the City of La Quinta's GHG Reduction Plan and General Plan goals and policies for reducing energy consumption. As a result, the project is required to incorporate energy efficient design features that result in substantial reductions in energy consumption and GHG emissions, including the measures described below and in the Draft EIR. Project Design Features: Energy -saving and sustainable design features, as well as operational programs would be incorporated into the project (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.5-22 — 4.5-29). Because these features/attributes are integral to the project, and/or are regulatory requirements, they are not considered to be mitigation measures but will be made enforceable by the City pursuant to the Specific Plan, Development Agreement, and/or project conditions of approval. The project will require submittal to the appropriate agencies discussed in this section for review and approval of on -site design for circulation, building standards and utility installation. The following PDFs are part of the project: Specified use of Energy Star appliances Installation of water -efficient plumbing fixtures Installation of tankless water heaters Installation of light -emitting diode (LED) technology within homes Use of recycled water (non -potable) for common area landscape irrigation Use of drought -tolerant plants in landscape design Installation of water -efficient irrigation systems with smart sensor controls 64 Installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems (15% of electricity supply) Installation of high efficiency lighting Applying energy efficient design building shells and components In addition, the mixed -use design of the project, combined with walkability and connectivity design elements and the multi -model transportation system, optimize on -site interaction and result in reduced vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled, as compared to purely residential or other standalone projects, thus reducing petroleum use (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.5-31 — 4.5-32). Finding: The City Council finds that compliance with existing state, regional, and City regulations, plans, and programs, in addition to the incorporation of the PDFs identified above and in the Draft EIR, including the use of energy efficient building materials and design features, would ensure that the project is consistent with all applicable state and local plans for energy efficiency and that consumption of energy resources would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary, and therefore, project impacts related to energy resources will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Facts in Support of Finding: Project construction and operation will not result in significant impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation because the project is consistent with CALGreen Building Codes and Title 24 codes and standards for both residential and nonresidential components of the project, as well as the City of La Quinta's GHG Reduction Plan and General Plan goals and policies for reducing energy consumption (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.5-20 — 4.5-34). The project proposes a mixed -use development that provides complementary uses with an emphasis on connectivity and alternative modes of transportation to reduce vehicle use within the project. In addition, the mandatory PDF's identified above result in a 17.25% reduction in projected electricity, thus further avoiding any wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy resources (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.5-25 — 4.5-28). Therefore, the project is consistent with General Plan Policy SC-1.5 and associated programs in the Livable Community Element in the General Plan. In addition, the Project will provide multiple transportation facilities for motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers of electric vehicles throughout the property and connecting to public transportation systems (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.5-30 — 4.5-33). The City Council also incorporates Responses 52-k, 59-b, and 61-h, into the City Council's findings, analysis, and conclusions regarding the project's energy use. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Direct or Indirect Effects Involving Strong Seismic Shaking or Landsides: Strong Seismic Shaking: The project site is located approximately 7.75 miles southwest of the closest active fault zone, the San Andreas Fault. The Geotechnical Investigation states that due to the multiple active faults in the project's vicinity, the site has been subjected to past ground shaking, and strong seismic shaking is expected during the design life of the proposed project. 65 599 Landslides: Coral Mountain, an elevated topographic feature defines the project property's southwest boundary, is identified in the City's General Plan as having a high or very high possibility of earthquake induced slope instability and potential for soil block slides, soil slumps, and rock falls. Soil Erosion or Loss of Topsoil: The project site is located in an area defined in the City's General Plan as having high and very high susceptibility to wind erosion. The project site is also subject to potential waterborne erosion. Project development has the potential to cause significant adverse erosion effects, including the generation of fugitive dust. Finding: The City Council finds that compliance with existing state, regional, and City regulations, plans, and programs will avoid significant risks from strong seismic shaking, landslides and soil erosion, and these geology and soils impacts would be less than significant. Facts in Support of Finding: The project will be required to comply with the most current seismic design coefficients and ground motion parameters in the California Building Code, and all site work will be conducted in accordance with the project -specific geotechnical and soils analysis, and therefore, impacts from strong seismic groundshaking are expected to be less than significant. The project does not propose any development at the base of Coral Mountain and the closest habitable structure would be located approximately 170 feet away. Accordingly, impacts relating to landslides will be less than significant. The project is required to implement the Coachella Valley PM10 Plan to avoid windblown sand from leaving the site. The project will also be required to implement a SWPPP to avoid stormwater from carrying soil or sand from the site. Finally, the project will require a Water Quality Management Plan for long-term operations to prevent soil or contaminants from being washed from the site. Compliance with these legal requirements will ensure that impacts relating to soil erosion are less than significant. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Consistency with Applicable Plan, Policy or Regulation. The project's construction and operations will generate some additional GHG emissions, and to the extent those emissions conflict with the CARB 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan or the City's GHG Reduction Plan, the project would have a significant adverse effect. 66 .W Finding: The City Council finds that the project is consistent with the applicable CARB 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, as described in detail on pages 4.7-20 through 4.7-25 of the Draft EIR, which analysis and conclusions are incorporated by this reference, and based thereon, finds that the project will not have any significant impacts relating to inconsistencies with applicable GHG plans, policies or regulations. Facts in Support of Finding: The facts in support of this finding are set forth in Table 4.7-9 of the Draft EIR (Scoping Plan Consistency Summary), which demonstrate that the project does not conflict with any of the plan components and supports seven of the Plan's action categories. In addition, the City Council reviewed and considered the Draft EIR comments relating to GHG emissions, including Comments 52-k, 79-h, 79-I and 79-q (which is a letter from SWAPE attached as Exhibit A to Comment letter 79), as well as the subsequent letters from Mitchell Tsai dated March 22, April 12, and April 26, 2022, and from SWAPE dated April 6, 2022. The City Council finds that these comments lack merit and fail to provide any substantial evidence of any new or more severe significant adverse effects relating to GHG emissions, beyond what is described above and in the Draft EIR, or of any inaccuracies in the Draft EIR or technical studies. Rather, the City Council finds Final EIR Responses 52-k, 79-h, 79-I and 79-q persuasive, and hereby adopts those responses and incorporates them into the City Council's findings, analysis and conclusions regarding GHG emissions. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials, Including Accidental Release The project will use oils, fuels, and other potentially flammable substances and materials in connection with construction activities. Project operations will include the transport, storage and use of sodium hypochlorite and sulfuric acid to treat and disinfect the Wave Basin, as well as other cleaning agents, building maintenance products, paints, solvents, fertilizers, and similar substances in amounts typical for resort projects. Effect on an Emergency Response Plan Project implementation will not interfere with the critical facilities, emergency transportation and circulation, or emergency preparedness coordination as set forth in the Emergency Services Element of the 2035 La Quinta General Plan and the City's Emergency Operations Plan (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.8-21— 4.8-23). Prior to construction, both the Fire Department and Police Department will review each sub -area plan as it is brought forward, to ensure safety measures are addressed, including emergency access, and project impacts will be less than significant (Draft EIR, at p. 4.8- 23). 67 601 Risk of Wildfires The project site, located on the southwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58, is currently vacant with scattered desert vegetation. Existing land uses that surround the project include a mix of residential uses and vacant, undeveloped land. According to CALFIRE's Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsible Areas Map, the project site is not located in a Moderate, High, or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). Additionally, CALFIRE's Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) in Locally Responsible Areas (LRAs) Map indicates that the project is located in a Local, State/Federal non-VHFHSZ area. Therefore, impacts of exposing people or structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires will be less than significant (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.8-23 — 4.8-24). Other Potential Hazards During the public review period for the Draft EIR, members of the public raised questions regarding whether the water temperature of the Wave Basin could reach temperatures that could be harmful to surfers, including from "brain eating ameba." These concerns are addressed in the Final EIR Responses 65-c and 77-u, and in Appendix M.2, which are hereby adopted by the City Council and incorporated in its findings, analysis and conclusions. As stated in those Responses, the size of the Wave Basin, the circulating wave action, and the relatively cooler temperatures at night avoid the risk of water temperatures reaching unsafe levels. In addition, the project is subject to Riverside County and State of California Department of Health regulations that ensure the water is properly treated and maintained to avoid any risk of unsafe bacteria levels. The Council finds the substantial evidence provided in those Responses demonstrates that the Wave Basin operations will not subject surfers or others to hazardous or unsafe water condition. Finding: The City Council finds that compliance with existing federal, state, regional, and City regulations will ensure impacts related to project construction and operations, including the maintenance of the Wave Basin and landscaped areas (i.e., disinfectants, fertilizers, pesticides, etc.), the potential for accidental release of hazardous materials, the potential effects on emergency response plans, the risk of wildfires, and other potential hazards will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Finding: The Wave Basin is treated through a combination of filtration, UV treatment, and typical pool - maintenance chemicals (sodium hypochlorite and sulfuric acid), and these chemicals will be properly stored on -site in polyethylene tanks located in a pre-engineered metal building with chemical resistant coating (see Draft EIR, at pp. 4.8-18, and Final EIR, Appendix M.2). The project is required to comply with the permitting and hazardous material handling requirements of Riverside County Municipal Code Chapter 8.64 and California Health & Safety Code Chapter 6.95, which further ensures that the project will not have any significant adverse effects relating to the transport, use, storage, or accidental release of hazardous materials (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.8-19 — 4.8-20). Also see Final EIR Responses 52-1 and 65-c, which are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference in the City Council's findings, analysis and conclusions. Finally, the City Council 68 602 rejects the assertion in the letter from Mitchell Tsai, dated April 26, 2022, that the EIR's analysis of hazardous materials is inadequate because it failed to include a Phase I environmental site assessment (ESA) and because it did not specifically analyze "contaminants of emerging concern" or "CEC," including "per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances." Rather, the City Council finds that the EIR properly determined that project site is not included on any list of hazardous materials sites, and that there is no evidence of any hazardous materials on the project site (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.8-20 — 4.8-21). The City Council finds that neither a Phase I ESA or a separate analysis of CECs is warranted or appropriate under CEQA given the particular facts and circumstances of the project and project site. In addition, as explained above and in the Draft EIR, the project is not located in a Moderate, High or Very High Fire Hazard Area and all implementing plans will be reviewed by the police and fire departments, so impacts relating to wildfires and emergency response plans will be less than significant. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Compliance with Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements During construction and operation (life of the project), implementation of the proposed development will be required to comply with CWA, NPDES, state, and local regulations to prevent violations or impacts to surface water quality standards and waste discharge requirements pertinent to surface or ground water quality. These requirements include development and implementation of a project -specific storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and compliance with NPDES General Permit, Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, as amended by 2010-00014-DWQ and 2012-006- DWQ, during all construction activities (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-16 and 4.9-17). The project is also required to develop and implement a project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and to comply with the NPDES Order No. R7-2013-0011 (Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) within the Whitewater River Watershed) during long-term operations (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-18 — 4.9-19). Effect on Groundwater Supplies or Interference with Groundwater Recharge The project will increase demand for potable and non -potable water as a result of developing currently vacant land with residential and resort uses, including the Wave Basin. The project's long-term water demand, and the availability of adequate water supplies, including from groundwater in the Indio subbasin, were evaluated in a project -specific Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification approved by CVWD ("WSA/WSV"). The project's total water demand is projected to be 958.63 acre feet per year (AFY), which accounts for approximately 0.49 percent of the total projected growth in water demand presented in the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-19 and 4.19-20). In addition, the WSA/WSV and the Indio Subbasin Groundwater Management Plan Update confirm that CVWD has adequate water supplies to serve the project and all other existing and planned future uses without substantially decreasing groundwater supplies. Finally, the project will not cause any direct or indirect impacts 69 603 to the Thomas Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility or otherwise interfere with CVWD's ongoing groundwater replenishment activities. Potential Impacts From Alteration of Existing Drainage Patterns Existing conditions across the project site are characterized by leveled terrain with scattered vegetation coverage resulting from past site clearing and agricultural operations on most of the property. The proposed uses will result in an increase in impervious surfaces that, without engineering controls, would result in an increase in total stormwater runoff volume, an increase in runoff velocity, and the potential to cause erosion impacts, flooding, and polluted runoff. However, as required through the City's engineering standards for land subdivisions and development, the project will incorporate on -site drainage and flood control improvements to intercept, convey, and retain stormwater runoff from the controlling 100-year storm event. Inundation by Flooding, Seiche, Tsunami or Mudflow The project is located in FEMA's Zone X designation, which applies to areas with "reduced flood risk due to levee." In this case, the project is protected from flood inundation by CVWD's Dike No. 2 and Dike No. 4. The project is not located near any coastal areas where tsunami damage is a risk. Although the project includes a Wave Basin that can create waves in excess of 6 feet tall, the Wave Basin is engineered to contain all water within the Wave Basin, including with sufficient freeboard to contain waves from the Wave Machine. This would also adequately address any risk of seiche (wave oscillations from wind, atmospheric conditions, or seismic activity). Consistencv with Water Quality Control Plan or Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan As discussed above, the project is required to comply with the applicable water control plans during both construction and for the life of the project. The project's consistency with the applicable Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan is also discussed above. Finding: The City Council finds that the project will not have any significant adverse effects relating to hydrology and water quality, including causing any violations of water quality standards or discharge requirements, causing any flooding or water quality impacts resulting from alterations to the existing drainage patterns in the area, creating any risk of release of pollutants, or conflicting with any water control plan. In addition, the City Council finds that the project will not have any significant adverse effects on existing or future groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with CVWD's ongoing groundwater recharge efforts. Facts Supporting Findings: Compliance with Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements During the construction phase compliance with water quality and waste discharge requirements will be achieved through the permit registration and coverage process under the NPDES General 70 .M- Permit identified above. This will require development and implementation of a project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that includes a strategy of BMPs that prevent pollution from leaving the site (see Draft EIR, at p. 4.9-17). During the life of the project, the water quality standards and discharge requirements will be met through compliance with the NPDES permit identified above, including developing and implementing a project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) demonstrating site design and source controls that prevent pollutant runoff and meet 100 percent of the Low Impact Development (LID) Site Design requirements, including the use of retention basins on -site. Compliance with these established regulatory requirements will ensure that the project will not violate any water quality or waste discharge requirements, and impacts will be less than significant. Effect on Groundwater Supplies or Interference with Groundwater Recharge The Draft EIR incorporates information from the WSA/WSV approved by CVWD as required by Section 15155 of the CEQA Guidelines (Draft EIR, Appendix M). For this proposed project, the City requested that CVWD prepare and approve a WSA/WSV. CVWD will be the public water supplier for the project with the source of domestic (potable) water supply for the project being the Indio Subbasin via CVWD's potable water distribution system. CVWD approved a WSA/WSV providing an assessment and verification of the availability of sufficient water supplies during normal, single -dry, and multiple -dry years over a 20-year projection period to meet the projected demands of the project, in addition to existing and planned future water demands of CVWD as required by the Water Code. The project's total water demand is projected to be 958.63 acre feet per year (AFY), which accounts for approximately 0.49 percent of the total projected growth in water demand presented in the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-19 and 4.19-20). Conditions in the Indio Subbasin are continually being assessed and quantified in management plans developed and implemented by CVWD. In December 2021, CVWD approved the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update, which provides the most current assessment of the subbasin and other water supplies, including consideration of the potential for extended extreme drought conditions. The Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update analyzes several scenarios over the 50-year period required by SOMA to address potential future water supply conditions, changes in land use, and implementation of water management projects including source substitution and new water supply projects. Climate change conditions were considered in all of these scenarios. To account for the potential effects of future climate change, the projections assume CVWD will contribute water to California's Lower Basin Drought Contingency Plan allotment for Colorado River water. Under this plan, CVWD is obligated to contribute approximately 14,000 to 24,500 AFY, which equals about 7 percent of California's total contribution, to prevent Lake Mead water levels reaching critically low levels (see Final EIR, at pp. 2-23 — 2-25). The modeling of these scenarios shows that implementation of water management projects that are already planned and CVWD's ongoing management actions can maintain the water balance in the Indio Subbasin, even with the expected effects of future climate change in the Colorado River Basin and on the State Water Project (see Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update, pp. 71 605 ES-9 — ES-12, p. 7-89, and Figures ES-6 and ES-8). Of note, the projections in this update include four projects with water features such as surf parks with a total projected demand of 500 AFY and for which CVWD has approved WSAs, inclusive of the 120 AFY demand for the Wave Basin in the Coral Mountain project. Accordingly, this information supports the conclusions in the DEIR that the project will not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the Indio Subbasin. Groundwater Recharge Efforts: The nearest groundwater recharge facility to the project is the Thomas Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility, located south of the project and separated from it by Dike No. 4. The proposed development will not result in any physical modifications to the existing CVWD recharge facility, nor will it result in any stormwater runoff condition capable of interfering with the facility operation. Surface and underground retention, result in infiltration and therefore contributes to on -site groundwater recharge. Existing off -site tributary runoff is also incorporated into the on -site retention system, such that the project will not impede the existing naturally occurring infiltration. Less than significant impacts are anticipated pertaining to interference with groundwater recharge (Draft EIR, at p. 4.9-22). Potential Impacts From Alteration of Existing Drainage Patterns Erosion or Siltation. For every drainage area associated with project implementation, the retention facilities will meet the City's requirements and will have varying amounts of surplus capacity. By conveying project runoff along engineered flow lines (pipes, surface swales, curb and gutter) instances of substantial erosion or siltation will be prevented. The on -site pervious areas of the project will be stabilized in accordance with approved landscaping plans. All on -site impervious and pervious land cover resulting from project implementation, including the storm drain system and surface basins, will be subject to proper operation and maintenance during the life of the project, as mandated by the WQMP agreement that will be required of this project prior to issuance of a grading permit. Therefore, less than significant impacts are expected pertaining to substantial erosion or siltation, on- or off -site (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-22 — 4.9-24). Substantially Increase Surface Runoff Water Causing Flooding. As a standard requirement under the City's Engineering Bulletin #06-16, the hydrology and storm drain design must account for flood protection of structures from the 100-year storm. Off -site flows from the tributary hillside areas to the west are also handled by the project through retention facilities to be constructed on - site. As such, the proposed storm drainage and flood control improvements will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-24 — 4.9-25). Therefore, the impact is less than significant. Exceed Stormwater Drainage Systems or Cause Polluted Runoff. The proposed development will incorporate on -site storm drain system improvements designed to capture and infiltrate stormwater runoff through retention facilities corresponding to each on -site drainage management area. Pertaining to runoff pollution, the on -site storm drain system's detention system will capture project area runoff in accordance with a WQMP, preventing uncontrolled release into any public MS4 facilities. Therefore, the project will not result in stormwater runoff conditions which would burden the City's existing MS4 capacity, create or contribute runoff water which 72 .M would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-25 — 4.9-26). Therefore, the impact will be less than significant. Impacts to Flood Flows. The project site is not located in an area with mapped flood flows, such as FEMA-designated floodways, nor are there any naturally occurring drainage courses. The site exhibits a relatively flat condition having resulted from prior agricultural land uses. The only known surface flows are those directly resulting from rain events and following the shallow elevation gradients. The project allocates space for stormwater retention facilities sized based on a Master Hydrology Report. Flood flows are not present on or around the project site, such that impedance, obstruction, or redirection would result from project implementation, and accordingly, impacts will be less than significant (Draft EIR at p. 4.9-26). Inundation by Flooding, Seiche, Tsunami or Mudflow Although the project is not located in any mapped seiche zones, such as those associated with large bodies of water, the proposed development will include a recreational wave feature which will be capable of creating mechanical waves in excess of 6 feet tall and the dissipation of that energy is calculated into the sloped edges. The facility will include sufficient freeboard, such that no water will escape the edges of the machine limits. All structural elements of the wave facility will be certified with structural engineering calculations during the building permit process to account for the anticipated seismic activity at this location and ensure the ability to safely withstand seismic wave forces. Through this design, water oscillations generated by seismic events will contained to prevent releases of water or potential inundation impacts, resulting in less than significant impacts (Draft EIR, at p. 4.9-27, and Final EIR Responses 42-g, 86-a, and 86-b, and Appendix M.2). The proposed land uses and facilities are not expected to involve the storage or handling of substantial amounts of chemicals, petroleum products or other hazardous materials, such that pollutant release would occur in the event of inundation. Project operations will involve the use of pollution prevention source control measures under the Final WQMP. These measures include restrictions to prevent contact between potential pollutants and stormwater facilities, including inlets, conveyances, and retention areas. The Wave Basin and all proposed on -site retention basins are designed with sufficient capacity and freeboard to adequately contain the controlling 100-year storm event, thus preventing ponding and other uncontrolled drainage conditions that could allow for pollutant releases (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-27 and 4.9-28). Therefore, the impact is less than significant. The project is not located near any coastal areas and therefore is not prone to tsunami hazards. No impacts are associated with this aspect (Draft EIR, at 4.9-27). Consistency with Water Quality Control Plan or Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan The project proponent is required to implement a project -specific WQMP to comply with the most current standards of the Whitewater River Region Water Quality Management Plan for Urban Runoff, Whitewater River Watershed MS4 Permit. The WQMP includes guidelines for facility 73 607 maintenance, pool water drainage, and other operations aimed at complying with local surface water quality requirements. The WQMP will incorporate grading, hydrology, and other plans to document the site design, source controls, and treatment controls with a required operation and maintenance program to comply with water quality objectives. Moreover, the project's storm water retention facilities will ensure that urban runoff is recharged into the ground via infiltration (Draft EIR, at p. 4.9-28). Therefore, impacts will be less than significant. LAND USE Consistency with Any Land Use Plan, Policy or Regulation. The project proposes development of a mixed -use project that includes low -density residential, commercial, resort, and open/space recreational uses. Current General Plan land use designations and zoning allow for low -density residential, neighborhood commercial, and open space/golf course uses, so the project includes applications for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow the proposed Tourist Commercial uses. These proposed changes are illustrated in the Draft EIR, at Tables 4.10-2 and 4.10-3. The Draft EIR evaluated the project's consistency with the City's 2035 General Plan Update goals and policies regarding Land Use, Circulation, Livable Communities, Economic Development, Parks, Recreation and Trails, Housing, Water Resources, Open Space and Conservation, Noise, Soils and Geology, Flooding and Hydrology, Hazardous Materials, Emergency Services, and Water, Sewer, and other Utilities. After evaluating the applicable goals and policies in each of these portions of the City's General Plan, the Draft EIR describes the reason the project is considered consistent with those goals and polices of the General Plan (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.10-15 — 4.10-24). The project's consistency with the other chapters of the General Plan are evaluated and found consistent in the corresponding chapters of the Draft EIR (Air Quality in Chapter 4.2 of the Draft EIR, Biological Resources in Chapter 4.3, Cultural Resources in Chapter 4.4, Energy in Chapter 4.5, and Public Facilities/Services in Chapter 4.12). With implementation of all identified mitigation measures and project design features, the Draft EIR concluded that the project is consistent with the General Plan with respect to all chapters. As the project is consistent with the General Plan and with the community character of this portion of the City, the project will not have any significant cumulative land use and planning impacts. Findings: The City Council hereby adopts and incorporates herein the findings, analysis and conclusions set forth in the Draft EIR, and further specifically finds that the project is consistent with the General Plan as to each and every of these chapters. The City Council also finds that the project Specific Plan will serve as the regulatory document providing the zoning requirements and restrictions for the project, and therefore, the project will be fully consistent with the applicable zoning. The City Council also specifically finds that the project is consistent with the character of the surrounding residential and golf course communities. Facts Supporting Findings: 74 .M The project has been designed to maintain low -density residential development along nearly all of the perimeter arterial roadways, and will be visually consistent and compatible with the other development along Madison Street, Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. The neighborhood serving commercial will complement the existing and planned future residential communities and reduce the need for lengthy trips for basic residential commercial needs of the residents. The project's hotel, Wave Basin and related tourist commercial uses will be located in the southwest portion of the site, a significant distance from the surrounding roadways and screened with perimeter walls, landscaping and low -density residential development. The City Council has reviewed the asserted General Plan inconsistencies set forth in Draft EIR comments 41-c and 83-v through 83-jj and finds those asserted inconsistencies to be lathing in any merit or substantial evidence. The City Council has also reviewed the Final EIR Responses 41-c and 83-v through 83 J and finds those responses persuasive. Responses 41-c and 83-v through 83-jj set forth in the Final EIR are hereby specifically adopted by the City Council and hereby incorporated into its findings, analysis and conclusions regarding the project's consistency with the City's General Plan. Finally, the City Council reviewed Draft EIR comments 524, 52-g, and the other public comments asserting that the project's allowance of short-term vacation rentals (STVRs), pursuant to the terms of the proposed Development Agreement, is inconsistent with the General Plan and would have adverse environmental effects that have not been fully analyzed or disclosed. The City Council finds those assertions to be lacking in merit and in any substantial evidence, and further finds that the allowance of STVRs in the project pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Development Agreement will not be inconsistent with the City's General Plan or have any undisclosed or unmitigated adverse environmental effects (other than as set forth in Section III of these Findings). The City Council has also reviewed the Final EIR Responses 52-f and 52-g, and hereby adopts those responses and incorporates them by this reference into the City Council's findings, analysis and conclusions regarding the allowance of STVRs. NOISE Generation of Ground Borne Vibration. The Final EIR analyzed the potential impacts of vibration created by the proposed project. Potential ground -borne vibration is associated with vehicular traffic and construction activities. Findings: The City Council finds that the project's impacts relating to the generation of ground borne vibration will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Findings: As described in the Draft EIR, ground -borne vibration levels from automobile traffic, including heavy trucks, are rarely perceptible beyond the roadway right-of-way, and the project generated traffic would not cause any significant adverse effects, including on the surrounding residential 75 .M communities (Draft EIR, at p. 4.11-50). In addition, the wave machine and wave action will not generate any measurable vibration outside of the Wave Basin itself (Final EIR, Appendix M.2, at pp. 1-2, and Response 42-g). To evaluate potential construction -related vibration, ground vibration levels associated with various types of construction equipment were analyzed, and as determined in the Noise Study, vibration levels at all nearby sensitive receptor locations would be below the perception threshold of 0.01 in/sec. (Draft EIR, Table 4.11-27). Accordingly, potential impacts form the generation of ground borne vibration and ground borne noise by project construction activities would be less than significant. PUBLIC SERVICES The Draft EIR analyzes the project's potential effects relating to the provision of public services, including fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, and other public facilities (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.12-9 — 4.12-15). The project will add residents, workers, and visitors to the project site, which will cause incremental increases in the demand for these public services. Findings: The City Council finds that the project's impacts on public services, including police services, fire protection, schools, parks, and other public facilities will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Findings: As described in the Draft EIR, with payment of the applicable City Development Impact Fees (DIF) and statutory school developer fees, the project will not have any significant project -specific or cumulative adverse effects on public services. Specifically, the project is required to pay the City's DIF in the amount in effect at the time of construction (the current DIF is $9,380 per residential unit) (Draft EIR at p. 4.12-11). These fees are used by the City to fund additional public facilities, including fire stations, police cars and facilities, parks, public buildings, and traffic improvements. With respect to emergency services, the nearest fire station is located within 2 miles of the project site and the project can be adequately served without the need for additional facilities (Draft EIR, at p. 4.12-10). No additional police facilities are anticipated to be required to serve the project, but the La Quinta Police Department may increase staffing to maintain its ratio of officers to residents (currently approximately 1.25 officers per 1,000 residents) (Draft EIR, at p. 4.12-11). P With respect to schools, pursuant to Government Code §§ 65995 et seq., the payment of statutory school fees is deemed to be full and complete mitigation for a project's impacts on schools, and the project is subject to those fees. 76 610 With respect to parks, the City currently exceeds its General Plan policy of providing a minimum of 5 acres of parks per 1,000 residents and exceeds the amount of parkland required under Quimby. In addition, the project proposes approximately 24 acres of recreational open space and private recreational facilities that will substantially reduce the demands the project residents will put on City park facilities. With payment of the City's DIF, impacts are expected to be less than significant. The project will also generate substantial transient occupancy taxes and sales tax that will add to the City's general fund, which is used to fund police and fire services, which is of particular importance for development in this portion of the City because the City will not receive any portion of the property taxes from this area until existing redevelopment bonds (issued by Riverside County before annexation into the City) are fully paid, which is not expected to occur until approximately 2035. TRANSPORTATION Consistency with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) [VMT]. Travel demand modeling of VMT for the project based upon City of La Quinta guidelines indicates a potential impact for residential uses while also indicating the project's non-residential uses do not exceed VMT thresholds. Project design features considered after the modeling process reduce residential VMT to below the City's VMT residential threshold for a significant impact. The unique mixed -use characteristics of the project, combined with walkability and connectivity design elements, optimize on -site interaction and result in a lower VMT than standalone uses. Project Design Features: Project VMT is reduced by the following project design features/attributes, which are enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement and/or Specific Plan, and are anticipated to collectively reduce project home -based VMT by approximately 6%. The placement of different types of land uses near one another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non -auto modes of transport. For example, when residential areas are in the same neighborhood as commercial and resort land uses, a resident does not need to travel outside of the neighborhood to meet his/her recreational and retail needs. The project's mixed -use environment could provide for a potential reduction in project residential VMT of 3% according to CAPCOA guidance. The project includes improved design elements to enhance walkability and connectivity, and encourage the use of alternative transportation. Recognized improved street network characteristics within the project include sidewalk coverage, building setbacks, street widths, pedestrian crossings, presence of street trees, and a host of other physical variables that differentiate pedestrian -oriented environments from auto -oriented environments. The project provides a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site. The project minimizes barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. The project includes sidewalk connections, particularly to / from the retail areas resulting in interaction with residential and resort 77 611 uses on -site. The project's implementation of this measure is anticipated to result in a potential reduction in project residential VMT of 2% according to CAPCOA guidance. The project will implement marketing strategies to optimize on -site resort and residential uses. Information sharing and marketing are important components to successful trip reduction strategies. Marketing strategies may include: resident member benefits that include use of the resort amenities; event promotions; and publications. Findings: The City Council finds that with implementation of the project design features stated above, which are being made enforceable through the Development Agreement, the project will be consistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, and impacts relating to VMT will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Findings: The Urban Crossroads VMT Evaluation calculated project VMT using the most current version of the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM). Adjustments in socioeconomic data (SED) (i.e., employment) were made to a separate Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) within the RIVTAM model to reflect the project's proposed population and employment uses, consistent with industry standards. The project is anticipated to generate approximately 1,698 project residents and 19,773 Home - Based VMT for baseline (2020) conditions. This results in approximately 11.64 home -based VMT/Capita for the 2020 Baseline with project conditions (Draft EIR, Table 4.13-31). In addition, the cumulative (2040) project scenario results in approximately 12.14 VMT/Service Population. Because the project exceeds the City's VMT/Capita threshold of 11.03 (based on the City's standard requiring a 15% reduction below its Citywide VMT/capita of 12.98), impacts would be considered potentially significant. However, the project incorporates design features and attributes promoting trip reduction which reduce residential VMT from 11.64 VMT/resident to 10.94 VMT/resident, including the placement of different land use types near one another as well as elements of the project that enhance walkability and connectivity between the mix of use types such as sidewalk coverage, building setbacks, street widths, pedestrian crossings and the presence of street trees (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.13-54 — 4.13-55). Implementation of the project design features will reduce potential impacts to below the City's established threshold for a significant VMT impact, and therefore, the residential portion of the project would have a less than significant VMT impact. The project Development Agreement and/or conditions of approval will ensure that the project design features identified in the Draft EIR are enforceable by the City. The VMT analysis methodology for retail uses (including hotels) focuses on the net increase in the total existing VMT for the region. The project consists of approximately 674 employees. Travel activity associated with total link -level VMT was extracted from the "without project" and "with non-residential project" RIVTAM model run for 2012 and 2040 conditions, then interpolated for baseline (2020) conditions. This methodology is referred to as "boundary method," and evaluates hotel occupants, Wave Basin visitors and retail patrons Draft EIR, 4.13-55 — 4.13-56). Using the boundary method, the Coachella Valley Association of Government's (CVAG) area VMT with 78 612 project employment is compared to without project conditions to determine whether there is a significant impact. The CVAG subregion VMT/SP without project is estimated at 21.56, whereas with the project employment, the CVAG subregion VMT is estimated at 21.53 (Draft EIR, Table 4.13-33). Therefore, the project's effect on VMT (for non-residential uses) is not significant because it results in a cumulative link -level boundary decrease under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition (see pages 4.13-55 and 4.13-56 of the Draft EIR). The unique mixed -use characteristics of the project, combined with walkability and connectivity design elements, optimize on -site interaction and result in a lower VMT than standalone uses. Implementation of the previously stated project PDFs will reduce potential impacts to below the City's established threshold for a significant VMT impact, and therefore, the project would have a less than significant VMT impact. Please also see Final EIR Responses 83-k and Appendix L.3, which the City Council hereby incorporates into its findings, analysis and conclusions. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Require or Result in Construction of New or Expanded Facilities for Water, Wastewater, Drainaue or Utilities. The Draft EIR analyzes the construction of new or expanded facilities for water, wastewater, drainage, and utilities, and whether the construction of such facilities would have any significant adverse effect. Water: As noted in CVWD's Comment 10-a and Final EIR Response 10-a, the project will require implementation of the previously planned water line extension in Avenue 60, west of Madison Street, to connect the project to CVWD's existing water facilities, which will be located in the existing disturbed right -of way and will not have any significant adverse effects, as described on page 2-52 of the Final EIR. In addition, the project's final engineering plans will undergo additional review by CVWD to assure compliance with all applicable requirements. Accordingly, the project will not have any project -specific or cumulative adverse effects relating to water infrastructure. Wastewater Facilities: The project will not have any significant project -specific or cumulative adverse effects concerning wastewater facilities because CVWD's existing Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4) has adequate capacity to serve the project (which will add approximately 3.3 percent to the existing flows to WRP-4), and because the project will connect to CVWD's existing sewer mains adjacent to the project site, which have adequate capacity to convey the additional flows from the project (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-17 — 4.15-18, and 4.15-32). In addition, the project's final engineering plans will undergo additional review by CVWD to assure compliance with all applicable requirements. Storm Water Facilities: Pursuant to the proj ect- specific Master Plan Hydrology Report (Draft EIR, Appendix J.3), the project provides sufficient on -site storm water retention to retain flows from the 100-year storm event, including flows coming onto the site from adjacent roadways, consistent 79 613 with City requirements, including La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #06-16. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-18 — 4.15-21). Electrical Facilities: The project site is located within the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) service area for electric service. The project will be required to install twelve, 6-inch conduits along Avenue 58 to bring additional power to the site and install a transformer bank at IID's existing substation yard located at Avenue 58 and Monroe Street (Draft EIR, at p. 4.15-21). These facilities were included in the project description and their potential adverse effects were fully evaluated in the Draft EIR and found to be less than significant because all improvements will occur on the substation site and previously disturbed road right-of-way. As discussed in the finding regarding energy above, and in Chapter 4.5 of the Draft EIR, the project is expected to require approximately 8,642,729 kWh of electricity per year, which constitutes approximately 0.19 percent of IID's total estimated demand in 2031, and IID has adequate capacity to serve the project and all other current and planned future users within its service area. Accordingly, impacts relating to electrical facilities are less than significant (Draft EIR, at pp, 4.15-21 — 4.15-22). Other Facilities: Natural gas and telecommunications/cable facilities are currently located adjacent to the project site along Madison Street and Avenue 58, and as analyzed in the Draft EIR, the utility providers (SoCal Gas, Frontier, and Charter Communications) can serve the project without the need for to construct new or expanded facilities (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-22 — 4.15-23). Accordingly, impacts will be less than significant. Sufficiency of Water Supplies To determine the adequacy of available water supplies to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, the Draft EIR incorporates information from the WSA/WSV approved by CVWD as required by Section 15155 of the CEQA Guidelines (Draft EIR, Appendix M). For this proposed project, the City requested that CVWD prepare and approve a WSA/WSV. CVWD will be the public water supplier for the project with the source of domestic (potable) water supply for the project being the Indio Subbasin via CVWD's potable water distribution system. CVWD approved a WSA/WSV providing an assessment and verification of the availability of sufficient water supplies during normal, single -dry, and multiple -dry years over a 20-year projection period to meet the projected demands of the project, in addition to existing and planned future water demands of CVWD as required by the Water Code. The WSA/WSV determined that project's total water demand is projected to be 958.63 acre feet per year (AFY), which accounts for approximately 0.49 percent of the total projected growth in water demand presented in the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.9-19 and 4.19-20). Wastewater Treatment System Capacity CVWD provides sanitary sewer service to the project, and the capacity of CVWD's wastewater treatment facilities are addressed in the Draft EIR at pp. 4.15-17 through 4.15-18, and 4.5-32. The project will connect to existing sewer mains located adjacent to the project, and the project will 80 614 add approximately 3.3 percent to the existing flows to CVWD's existing Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4). Generate Excess Solid Waste As described on pages 4.15-32 and 4.15-33 of the Draft EIR, the project is projected to generate 581.6 tons of solid waste per year, which equals 3,574.5 cubic yards of solid waste per year. Solid waste from the City of La Quinta is transported to the Edom Hill Transfer Station, and then sent to the Lamb Canyon Landfill (8.7 million tons of remaining capacity) or the Badlands Landfill (5.1 million tons of remaining capacity) (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-4 and 4.15-5). Comply with Statutes and Regulations Related to Solid Waste. The project is required to comply with the mandatory commercial and residential recycling requirements of Assembly Bill 341 and the Cal Green requirement for a construction waste management plan that includes diversion of at least 65% of construction and demolition materials from landfills, through recycling and/or reuse (Draft EIR, at p. 4.15-33). Findings: The City Council finds that the project's impacts concerning utilities and service systems will be less than significant. The City Council finds that the new and expanded utilities facilities to be constructed as part of the project, including the upgraded electrical substation, additional electrical conduit, and water line extension, will not have any significant adverse effects. The City Council further finds that there are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and all reasonably foreseeable future development, as well as all existing uses within the Indio Subbasin, during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, and further finds that the project's impacts relating to water use are less than significant. The City Council also finds that there is adequate capacity in CVWD's wastewater treatment system and Riverside County Department of Waste Resources' landfills to meet the project's wastewater and solid waste demands, and finds that the project will comply with all applicable solid waste statutes, policies, and guidelines, Facts in Support of Findings: Require or Result in Construction of New or Expanded Facilities for Water, Wastewater, Drainage or Utilities. Water: As noted in CVWD's Comment 10-a and Final EIR Response 10-a, the project will require implementation of the previously planned water line extension in Avenue 60, west of Madison Street, to connect the project to CVWD's existing water facilities, which will be located in the existing disturbed right -of way and will not have any significant adverse effects, as described on page 2-52 of the Final EIR. In addition, the project's final engineering plans will undergo additional review by CVWD to assure compliance with all applicable requirements. Accordingly, the project will not have any project -specific or cumulative adverse effects relating to water infrastructure. 81 615 Wastewater Facilities: The project will not have any significant project -specific or cumulative adverse effects concerning wastewater facilities because CVWD's existing Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4) has adequate capacity to serve the project (which will add approximately 3.3 percent to the existing flows to WRP-4), and because the project will connect to CVWD's existing sewer mains adjacent to the project site, which have adequate capacity to convey the additional flows from the project (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-17 — 4.15-18, and 4.15-32). In addition, the project's final engineering plans will undergo additional review by CVWD to assure compliance with all applicable requirements. Storm Water Facilities: Pursuant to the project -specific Master Plan Hydrology Report (Draft EIR, Appendix J.3), the project provides sufficient on -site storm water retention to retain flows from the 100-year storm event, including flows coming onto the site from adjacent roadways, consistent with City requirements, including La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #06-16. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-18 — 4.15-21). Electrical Facilities: The project site is located within the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) service area for electric service. The project will be required to install twelve, 6-inch conduits along Avenue 58 to bring additional power to the site and install a transformer bank at IID's existing substation yard located at Avenue 58 and Monroe Street (Draft EIR, at p. 4.15-21). These facilities were included in the project description and their potential adverse effects were fully evaluated in the Draft EIR and found to be less than significant because all improvements will occur on the substation site and previously disturbed road right-of-way. As discussed in the finding regarding energy above, and in Chapter 4.5 of the Draft EIR, the project is expected to require approximately 8,642,729 kWh of electricity per year, which constitutes approximately 0.19 percent of IID's total estimated demand in 2031, and IID has adequate capacity to serve the project and all other current and planned future users within its service area. Accordingly, impacts relating to electrical facilities are less than significant (Draft EIR, at pp, 4.15-21 — 4.15-22). Other Facilities: Natural gas and telecommunications/cable facilities are currently located adjacent to the project site along Madison Street and Avenue 58, and as analyzed in the Draft EIR, the utility providers (SoCal Gas, Frontier, and Charter Communications) can serve the project without the need for to construct new or expanded facilities (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-22 — 4.15-23). Accordingly, impacts will be less than significant. Sufficiency of Water Supplies Approved WSA/WSV Wave Basin Water Demand Estimate CVWD approved a WSA/WSV for the project providing an assessment and verification of the availability of sufficient water supplies during normal, single -dry, and multiple -dry years over a 20-year projection period to meet the projected demands of the project, in addition to existing and planned future water demands of CVWD as required by the Water Code. CVWD estimates the project's total domestic water demand for indoor and outdoor use will be approximately 958 acre- feet per year (AFY). The vast majority of this water is for outdoor uses, which total 801.47 AFY of the total 958 AFY for the project. The project's outdoor water use is calculated pursuant to the express requirements of CVWD Landscape Ordinance No. 1302.4, and those calculations are 82 616 shown in Table 2.0-3, Outdoor Water Demand from the Approved WSA/WSV (also copied on Final EIR p. 2-18). The Wave Basin itself is projected to use 119.58 AFY, or approximately 15% of the projected outdoor water use. The CVWD Landscape Ordinance defines a "Water Feature" as any water applied to the landscape for non -irrigation, decorative purposes, including fountains, streams, ponds and lakes. The Wave Basin is considered a water feature under CVWD Landscape Ordinance No. 1302.4 and is assigned the highest evapotranspiration upward adjustment factor of 1.2 for a moving body of water. Page 22 in the WSA/WSV WSA identifies the information used to estimate the annual water demand for the proposed Wave Basin: 0 64.22 inches per year for a reference Eto; • ET adjustment factor of 1.2 for a moving water body; 0 815,443 square feet of area; and 0 a conversion of 0.62 to convert to gallons. Based on these factors the MAWA for the Wave Basin was determined to be 119.58 AFY. It should be noted that for purposes of determining the MAWA for the proposed Wave Basin, the approved WSA/WSV applies the water demand factor to the Wave Basin structure as defined in the Specific Plan, which at the time the WSA was prepared was conservatively estimated to be 18.72 acres (815,443 square feet). However, the surface area of the Wave Basin water body will not occupy this entire area. The water surface area of the proposed Wave Basin will occupy approximately 12.5 acres (544,500 square feet) of this 18.72 acres (815,443 square foot) area (see Draft EIR, Project Description, at pp. 3-19 — 3-20). The remainder of the Wave Basin area contains the deck and other areas around the Wave Basin. The water demand estimate for the Wave Basin in the approved WSA/WSV is, therefore, conservative as it applies the water demand factor to 18.72 acres when the Wave Basin water body will only occupy 12.5 acres of this area (see Final EIR, atp. 2-19). The project also includes significant water reduction and sustainability measures, consistent with City and CVWD requirements. Specifically, as described on page 4.15-16 of the Draft EIR, the following water conservation measures are standard requirements of the City and CVWD landscape ordinances and applicable state law requirements, and will be implemented at the project to ensure the most efficient use of water resources for the proposed uses, and to meet the applicable Water Management Plan goals throughout the life of the project: 1. Native plant materials and other drought tolerant plants shall be used in all non - turf areas of project landscaping. Large expanses of lawn and other water - intensive landscaped areas shall be kept to the minimum necessary and consistent with the functional and aesthetic needs of the project, while providing soil stability to resist erosion. 2. In the event recycled water becomes available to the project, the potential use of tertiary treated water will be reviewed to determine feasibility of its use for onsite landscaped 83 617 areas to reduce the use of groundwater for irrigation. 3. The installation and maintenance of efficient onsite irrigation systems will minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize effective watering of plant roots. Drip irrigation and moisture detectors will be used to the greatest extent practicable to increase irrigation efficiency. 4. The use of low -flush toilets and water conserving showerheads and faucets shall be required in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Building Code. 5. Project developers will pay any required CVWD groundwater replenishment fees for the purpose of buying additional supplies of water for importation into the basin. Approved WSA/WSV Water Supplies and Entitlements: This WSA/WSV approved by CVWD also includes identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, water service contracts, or agreements relevant to the identified water supply for the project and quantities of water received in prior years pursuant to those entitlements, rights, contracts, and agreements. In reviewing those sources, including an examination of the current condition of the Indio Subbasin of the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin, the WSA/WSV concluded that the water supplies available from the Indio Subbasin, the State Water Project (SWP), the Colorado River, and other sources will be adequate to supply the project and all other existing and planned uses in accordance with California Water Code Section 10910 et seq., as further described in the Draft EIR at pp, 4.15-26 — 4.15-31. Those findings by CVWD are hereby incorporated by this reference. Conditions in the Indio Subbasin are continually being assessed and quantified in management plans developed and implemented by CVWD. In December 2021, CVWD approved the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update, which provides the most current assessment of the subbasin and other water supplies, including consideration of the potential for extended extreme drought conditions. The Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update analyzes several scenarios over the 50-year period required by SGMA to address potential future water supply conditions, changes in land use, and implementation of water management projects including source substitution and new water supply projects. Climate change conditions were considered in all of these scenarios. To account for the potential effects of future climate change, the projections assume CVWD will contribute water to California's Lower Basin Drought Contingency Plan allotment for Colorado River water. Under this plan, CVWD is obligated to contribute approximately 14,000 to 24,500 AFY, which equals about 7 percent of California's total contribution, to prevent Lake Mead water levels reaching critically low levels (see Final EIR, at pp. 2-23 — 2-25). The modeling of these scenarios shows that implementation of water management projects that are already planned and CVWD's ongoing management actions can maintain the water balance in the Indio Subbasin, even with the expected effects of future climate change in the Colorado River 84 NU Basin and on the State Water Project (see Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update, pp. ES-9 — ES-12, p. 7-89, and Figures ES-6 and ES-8). Of note, the projections in this update include four projects with water features such as surf parks with a total projected demand of 500 AFY and for which CVWD has approved WSAs, inclusive of the 120 AFY demand for the Wave Basin in the Coral Mountain project. Accordingly, this information supports the conclusions in the DEIR that the project (1) will not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the Indio Subbasin; and (ii) will have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, and therefore, will not have any significant adverse effects relating to water use. Based on both the project -specific WSA/WSV and the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update, the City Council finds that CVWD has correctly calculated for, and demonstrated that it can supply the water demand generated by the proposed project, as well as all other existing and projected future demands. In addition, the City Council has reviewed and considered the public comments questioning the accuracy of the water demand calculations in the WSA/WSV, including the alternative water demand and evaporation figures cited in Comment 65-d in the Final EIR. The City Council finds these alternative evaporation figures and calculations to lack sufficient verified information regarding the project site and the proposed Wave Basin to constitute substantial evidence regarding the proj ect's water demands or the sufficiency of available water supplies. On the other hand, the City Council finds the information in the WSA/WSV, the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update approved by CVWD, and the Topical Response on Water Resources in the Final EIR (pp. 2-17 — 2-28), to be valid and persuasive substantial evidence that the project will not have any significant adverse effects on groundwater supplies or CVWD's recharge activities and other groundwater basin management efforts. The City Council also adopts Final EIR Responses 52-o, 65-d, 83-1, and 83-m and incorporates those responses as part of its findings, analysis and conclusions that there are adequate available water supplies to serve the project and all other existing and planned future uses, and that the project will have less than significant effects on groundwater supplies and CVWD's recharge and other groundwater management efforts. Finally, the City Council has reviewed and considered the letter and accompanying memo submitted by Bruce Bauer on February 7, 2022, and the letter dated April 12, 2022, asserting errors and inadequacies in the WSA/WSV. The City Council finds that, contrary to the assertion in the Bauer letters, both the WSA/WSV and the Draft EIR provide complete and accurate information regarding the evaporation and water demand calculations for the project in full compliance with the requirements of CEQA, including the specific water demands of the proposed Wave Basin. The City Council further finds that the analysis of water evaporation and water use at the proposed DSRT SURF project located in Palm Desert is inapplicable to the proposed project because that location has different evaporation rates, and the two projects have different designs and operational characteristics. . With regard to evaporation, CVWD defines evaporation (ETo) rates for each of four different climate zones in its service area which reflect several important factors including local elevation, wind, and shadow conditions, in addition to temperatures (see Appendix C to Landscape 85 619 Ordinance 1302.4). The project site is located in Zone #3 with the Wave Basin proposed near the border of Zone #2 and adjacent to Coral Mountain, which experience lower evaporation rates than Zone #5 due to lower winds, lower temperatures, and increased shadowing from the nearby mountains. The DSRT SURF lagoon water feature planned in the Desert Willow project in Palm Desert is located in Zone #5, the zone that experiences the greatest evaporation in the Coachella Valley. CVWD's estimated water demand for the Wave Basin accounts for the localized elevation, wind, and shadow conditions of the Coral Mountain Project site is appropriate for the project site. In addition, the WSA/WSV and Final EIR for the project take into account the specific size and design features of the proposed Wave Basin, not the features proposed for the DSRT SURF project, which are substantially different based on the statements in the memo attached to the Bauer letter. Accordingly, the City Council finds the water demand analysis used for the DSRT SURF project to be inapplicable here, and finds the arguments and information in the Bauer letter lack substantial evidence. Wastewater Treatment System Capacity The project will not have any significant project -specific or cumulative adverse effects concerning CVWD's wastewater treatment system capacity because CVWD's existing Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4) has adequate capacity to serve the project (which will add approximately 3.3 percent to the existing flows to WRP-4), and because the project will connect to CVWD's existing sewer mains adjacent to the project site, which have adequate capacity to convey the additional flows from the project (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-17 — 4.15-18, and 4.15-32). Generate Excess Solid Waste As described on pages 4.15-32 and 4.15-33 of the Draft EIR, the project is projected to generate 581.6 tons of solid waste per year, which equals 3,574.5 cubic yards of solid waste per year. Solid waste from the City of La Quinta is transported to the Edom Hill Transfer Station, and then sent to the Lamb Canyon Landfill (8.7 million tons of remaining capacity) or the Badlands Landfill (5.1 million tons of remaining capacity) (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-4 and 4.15-5). In addition, all future development would be required to comply with mandatory commercial and residential recycling requirements of Assembly Bill 341. The project will comply with all applicable solid waste statutes, policies and guidelines; and the project will be served by landfills (El Sobrante and Lamb Canyon) with sufficient capacity to serve the project (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-32 — 4.15-33). Therefore, impacts relative to solid waste are less than significant. Comply with Statutes and Regulations Related to Solid Waste. The project will comply with all applicable solid waste statutes, policies and guidelines. All development is required to comply with the mandatory commercial and residential recycling requirements of Assembly Bill 341. The California Green Building Standards Code (Cal Green) applies to all cities in California, and mandates that all new building construction develop a waste management plan that includes diversion of at least 65% of construction and demolition material from landfills, through recycling and/or reuse. Prior to applying for a permit, the contractor or property owner must submit a Construction & Demolition Debris Management Plan to the City's 86 620 Environmental Coordinator. There will be no significant adverse effects relating to applicable solid waste regulations because the project is required to, and will comply with all such regulations (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-33). V. FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS HAVING NO IMPACT BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Federally protected wetlands. The site does not contain, nor is it adjacent to, federally protected wetlands, marshes or other drainage features. No blue -line stream corridors (streams or dry washes) are shown on U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) maps for the project site nor are there botanical indicators of such corridors. As a result, implementation of the project would not result in the direct removal, filling or other hydrological interruption to federally protected wetlands. Therefore, the project will have no impacts on federally protected wetlands (Draft EIR, at p. 4.3-17). GEOLOGY AND SOILS Effects Involving Rupture of a Known Fault. There are no known active faults near or at the project site, and the project is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, there will be no impact associated with fault rupture on -site (Draft EIR p. 4.6-15). HAZARDS AND HAZADOUS MATERIALS Hazardous Materials within 1/4 mile of a school. The project site is not located within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school. The closest school to the project site is Westside Elementary School, located approximately 1.30 miles northeast of the project. Offsite improvements include the construction and operation of a transformer bank at an existing IID substation located at 81600 Avenue 58. The substation is located approximately one mile southwest of Westside Elementary School. Therefore, the project's proposed onsite and offsite improvements will have no impact on schools as it relates to hazardous materials. Sites with Known Hazardous Materials Pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Government Code section 65962.5 requires that a list of the location of hazardous materials release site be maintained and updated least annually. The GeoTracker and ECHO databases listed sites within one mile of the project. The GeoTracker database listed one registered Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Cleanup Site within a one -mile radius of the project site. The potential contaminant of concern at this site was identified as gasoline; however, the site has a 87 621 status of "Completed -Case Closed" as of October 1999. Therefore, the facility will not affect the project or result in any hazard to the public (Draft EIR, at p. 4.8-20). The ECHO database highlighted one facility registered under the Clean Water Act (CWA) as a minor general permit covered facility, which is located approximately 0.75 miles from the project site. The facility has remained in compliance for three consecutive years with no identified violations, and due to its distance from the proposed project, the registered site is not anticipated to affect the project site (Draft EIR, at p. 4.8-20 — 4.8-21). Therefore, hazardous waste sites will have no impact on the proposed project. Effects Having No Impact and Not Analyzed Further in Draft EIR In addition to the foregoing potential environmental effects, for which the City Council finds that the following impacts associated with the project will have no impacts and do not require mitigation, the City Council further finds that the following impacts associated with the project will have no impacts, do not require mitigation, and did not need to be analyzed in further detail within the Final EIR: Agriculture and Forest Resources, Geology and Soils (with respect to septic tanks/alternative wastewater disposal systems only), Hazards and Hazardous Materials (safety hazards for projects located within an airport land use plan only), Land Use and Planning (physically divide an established community only), Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Noise (exposure to airport noise), Recreation, and Wildfire. The Final EIR summarizes these impacts that were found to be insignificant in Chapter 6, and the City Council hereby adopts the findings, analysis and conclusions set forth therein. VI. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN THE DEIR AND REJECTED The State CEQA Guidelines section 15126.6(a) requires the discussion of a "a reasonable range of alternatives to a project, or the location of a project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." The Guidelines states that the "range of potential alternatives to the proposed project shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects" (Section 15126(c)). The Final EIR evaluated a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project. These alternatives are: Alternative 1: No Project/No Build Alternative 2: No Project/Existing Entitlements Alternative 3: Reduced Density Alternative Alternative 4: The Golf/Resort Hotel Alternative Alternative 5: The Lake Amenity/No Hotel Alternative When a lead agency has determined that a proposed project will still cause one or more significant environmental effects that cannot be substantially lessened or avoided after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures, prior to approving the project as mitigated, the agency must 88 622 determine whether there remain any project alternatives that are both environmentally superior with respect to such impacts and feasible within the meaning of CEQA. An alternative may be rejected if it is "infeasible" or if it fails to achieve most of the basic project objectives identified within the EIR. "Feasibility" under CEQA encompasses the desirability of the project based on a reasonable balancing of relevant economic, environmental, social, or other considerations which make infeasible the project alternatives. Alternative 1: No ProjecOVo Build CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 (e) requires the analysis of alternatives to include the specific alternative of "No Project." The purpose of describing and analyzing a No Project alternative is to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving the proposed project with the impacts of not approving the proposed project. Under the No Project/No Build Alternative ("Alternative 1"), the project would remain in its current and existing vacant condition. The existing visual character and visual resources would remain the same, and none of the significant impacts of the project would occur. Finding and Facts in Support of Finding Although the No Project/No Build Alternative would be considered the environmentally superior alternative in that it would avoid the significant adverse effects of the project; the City Council of the City of La Quinta rejects the No Project/No Build Alternative for the following reasons: The No Project/No Build Alternative is inconsistent with the General Plan, insofar as this alternative would not implement the General Plan's land uses for the property, which the City Council considers inconsistent with its vision for City land use policy under the General Plan. 2. The No Project/No Build Alternative does not meet any of the project objectives. In particular, the project will create a private resort community with a variety of interrelated and mutually supportive commercial and recreational land uses that will generate transient occupancy and sales tax revenues in order to enhance the City's economic base and long-term financial stability, which are significant public benefits that will not be realized under the No Project/No Build Alternative. 4. This alternative could result in the loss of the adobe structure and would leave the pre- historic Coral Mountain Rock Art Complex resources at the base of Coral Mountain unprotected, which could result in a significant impact to historic and pre -historic resources. 5. The project site remaining in its existing condition is not considered the most likely outcome if the proposed project is not approved, due to the existing entitlements associated with SP 03-067, which would remain in effect if the project is disapproved. 89 623 The City Council therefore finds the No Project/No Build Alternative is unacceptable and rejects it. Alternative 2: No Project/Existing Entitlements Under this alternative, the 386-acre portion of the project would be developed under the existing Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan (03-067). This Alternative would develop approximately 8.4 acres of General Commercial, 204.2 acres of Low Density Residential, and approximately 171.9 acres of Open Space (Recreation) land uses. Alternative 2 would include the development of 750 low density residential units and a golf course. It is anticipated that the golf course would be privately owned and would be operated as a resort -style course that is available to the public to play on a daily fee basis to ensure economic viability. The neighborhood commercial uses would be typical of those found in other neighborhood commercial centers in the City, providing a range of retail uses. Finding and Facts in Support of Finding The City Council of the City of La Quinta rejects the No Project/Existing Entitlements Alternative for the following reasons: 1. This Alternative would not generate the transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues anticipated with the proposed project that would enhance the City's economic base and support the City's long-term financial stability, which is considered a significant public benefit of the proposed project. 2. The No Project/Existing Entitlements Alternative does not meet many of the basic project objectives, including developing a private resort community with a variety of interrelated and mutually supportive commercial and recreational land uses that promote walkability and non -motorized connectivity, in addition to generating TOT revenue that offsets the public service costs associated with any development of the project site. 3. This Alternative would have increased adverse environmental effects in the areas of Air Quality, GHG Emissions, Vehicle Miles Traveled, as described on pages 7-17, 7- 20 — 7-21, and 7-26 of the Draft EIR, due to the lack of complimentary land uses and connectivity, and would increase the project water demands due to inclusion of the golf course uses (see Draft EIR, page 7-27). The Air Quality and GHG Emissions would be significant and unavoidable impacts, and would be somewhat greater than those anticipated with the proposed project. While this Alternative would reduce the project's aesthetic impacts, the significant and unavoidable impact on views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains would still result from construction of the perimeter walls, landscaping and single-family homes. Impacts concerning electricity use, land use and planning, and noise would be incrementally reduced, but these impacts would also be reduced to less -than -significant levels under the proposed project. 624 The City Council therefore finds the No Project/Existing Entitlements Alternative unacceptable and rejects it. Alternative 3: Reduced Density Alternative The project would be reduced by one-third of the proposed density of the project under this Alternative. Therefore, this Reduced Density Alternative would develop 400 residential dwelling units, 100 resort/hotel rooms, 38,000 square feet of resort commercial uses, and 40,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial uses. The Wave Basin and other proposed recreational amenities would remain part of the project as presently proposed. Finding and Facts in Support of Finding The City Council of the City of La Quinta rejects the Reduced Density Alternative for the following reasons: 1. The Reduced Density Alternative does not meet all of the project objectives, including maintaining the overall density previously included for this property in the Andalusia Specific Plan. 2. The Reduced Density Alternative would fail to generate the same levels of transient occupancy and sales tax revenues in order to enhance the City's economic base and long-term financial stability. 3. This Alternative would reduce the GHG emissions estimated for the proposed project by reducing the number of hotel rooms, residences, and commercial areas (Draft EIR, at pp. 7-35 — 7-36), but as described above, this Alternative fails to maintain the overall density included for this property in the City's General Plan and fails to meet the City's desired level of tax revenues for the City, and for those reasons, deemed by the City Council to be infeasible. 4. This Alternative would not reduce the project's significant and unavoidable aesthetic impact on views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains, which would still result from construction of the perimeter walls, landscaping, and single-family homes (Draft EIR, at pp. 7-30 — 7-32). The City Council therefore finds the Reduced Density Alternative unacceptable and rejects it. Alternative 4: The Golf/Resort Hotel Alternative This Alternative would develop a resort hotel of 150 hotel rooms and associated recreational, restaurant and retail amenities, an 18-hole championship golf course that would be open to the public to play on a daily fee basis, and 600 low -density residential units, but would not include the Wave Basin and related uses. 91 625 Finding and Facts in Support of Finding The City Council of the City of La Quinta rejects the Golf/Resort Hotel Alternative for the following reasons: The proposed project will develop a high -quality private wave basin (The Wave) that provides unique recreational opportunities for future residents of the project, and that attracts resort guests and creates a landmark facility, which would not occur with this alternative. 2. This alternative would generate greater air quality impacts (Draft EIR, p. 7-46) and GHG emissions (Draft EIR, 7-49) because the project's projected 12-15% emissions reductions resulting from the complimentary and integrated mix of uses and other PDFs would not be achieved under this alternative, and these impacts would potentially be significant and unavoidable. This alternative would also increase the project's water demands by 133.88 acre-feet per year (an increase of approximately 14%) because the golf course would use substantially more water than the Wave Basin amenity (Draft EIR, pp. 7-54 — 7-55). 4. This alternative would also fail to substantially reduce any of the significant and unavoidable impacts of the project. Although the project would have incrementally reduced impacts in the areas of aesthetics, energy, and noise, these impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level, as would the proposed project. Accordingly, this alternative is not considered environmentally superior to the proposed project. The City Council therefore finds the Golf/Resort Hotel Alternative unacceptable and rejects it. Alternative 5: The Lake Amenity/No Hotel Alternative This Alternative would develop a lake amenity, instead of the Wave Basin, and would include 750 low -density residential units and 8.4 acres of commercial uses at the northeast corner of the property, consistent with the existing entitlements for the project site. The lake would be approximately 75 acres, and would be used for typical lake uses, including small electric boats, sailing, kayaking and paddle boarding (but not gas -powered boats or recreational watercraft). This Alternative would not have the hotel or other Tourist Commercial uses and would not have the occasional special events that would be associated with the Wave Basin. Finding and Facts in Support of Finding The City Council of the City of La Quinta rejects the Lake Amenity/No Hotel Alternative for the following reasons: 1. This Alternative would not generate the transient occupancy tax revenues anticipated with the proposed project that would enhance the City's economic base and support the 92 626 City's long-term financial stability, which is considered a significant public benefit of the proposed project. 2. The Lake Amenity/No Hotel Alternative does not meet many of the basic project objectives, including developing a private resort community with a variety of interrelated and mutually supportive commercial and recreational land uses that promote walkability and non -motorized connectivity, in addition to generating TOT revenue that offsets the public service costs associated with any development of the project site. 3. This Alternative would have increased adverse environmental effects in the areas of Air Quality (Draft EIR, pp. 7-59 — 7-60), GHG Emissions (Draft EIR, p. 7-62), and Vehicle Miles Traveled (Draft EIR, p. 7-67), due to the lack of complimentary land uses and connectivity, and would increase the project water demands due to inclusion of the 75-acre lake (Draft EIR, p. 7-68). The increased Air Quality, GHG Emissions, and VMT impacts would be significant and unavoidable. While this Alternative would reduce the project's aesthetic impacts, the significant and unavoidable impact on views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains would still result from construction of the perimeter walls, landscaping and single-family homes (Draft EIR, pp. 7-58 — 7- 59). Impacts concerning electricity use and noise would also be incrementally reduced, but these impacts would be mitigated to less -than -significant levels consistent with the proposed project. Accordingly, this Alternative is not considered environmentally superior to the proposed project. The City Council therefore finds the Lake Amenity/No Hotel Alternative unacceptable and it is rejected. Additional Findings Regarding the Environmentally Superior Alternative A summary comparison of impacts associated with the project Alternatives is provided in the Draft EIR in Table 7-6, Comparison of Alternatives to Project. Of the Alternatives considered in this Draft EIR section, the No Project/No Build Alternative is environmentally superior to the other Alternatives because this Alternative would avoid any impacts identified for the project or any other alternative. Although Alternative 1 is environmentally superior, it does not meet any of the objectives of the proposed project because it would not involve any development of the site. The CEQA Guidelines require that the EIR identify an environmentally superior alternative to the project and "if the environmentally superior alternative is the `no project' alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives." CEQA Guidelines Section 15126[e][2]. In general, the environmentally superior alternative minimizes adverse impacts to the environment, while still achieving the basic project objectives. Of the remaining alternatives, Alternative 3 (reduced density project) would be the environmentally superior alternative because it would result in incremental reductions with respect 93 627 to the following environmental topics: air quality, energy, noise, public services, transportation, and utility & services. This Alternative would also avoid the project's significant and unavoidable impact regarding GHG emissions. However, Alternative 3 would fail to adequately meet the proposed project's basic objective of maintaining the overall density count previously included in the Andalusia Specific Plan, which the City Council finds to be inconsistent with the General Plan and unacceptable for that reason. This Alternative also would fail to generate the same levels of transient occupancy and sales taxes to enhance the City's economic base and long-term financial stability. While Alternative 3 is considered to be the environmentally superior alternative, the City Council rejects it as infeasible because it is inconsistent with the City's General Plan and considered economically infeasible due to the reduced TOT and sales tax revenue that the City Council considers critical for this property because until 2035, 100% of all real property taxes from the project site must be used to retire a long-term debt from the County's former Thermal Redevelopment Project Area. As a result, Alternative 3 is rejected. VIL STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." As described in Section III of these Findings, the project will have significant and unavoidable impacts in the following two areas: (1) the project's perimeter walls, landscaping and low -density residential homes will obstruct existing views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains from public views and surrounding properties; and (2) the project will generate GHG emissions that exceed the SCAQMD's established threshold of significance, and even with implementation of the recommended mitigation measure requiring the purchase of carbon credits, this effect is considered significant and unavoidable because the use of carbon credits has not been established in the Coachella Valley area as effective mitigation for residential and resort communities, and because even with the purchase of such credits, the project will still generate GHG emissions that exceed the SCAQMD threshold. As permitted under CEQA Guideline 15093(b) the City Council of the City of La Quinta adopts and makes this statement of overriding considerations concerning the project's unavoidable significant impacts to aesthetics and greenhouse gas emissions to explain why the project's specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, outweigh its unavoidable impacts. In general, the project site provides an appropriate location for the proposed residential, recreation and commercial uses that will provide employment, housing, recreation, and increased property and sales tax revenue opportunities for the City, its residents and visitors. The City Council of the City of La Quinta finds that the project's significant environmental impacts are acceptable when balanced with the project's benefits. Each of the benefits cited below constitutes a separate and independent basis that justifies approval of the project and outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects of approving the project, and thus make the adverse environmental effects acceptable. Thus, even in the absence of one or more of the reasons set forth below, the City has determined that each remaining reason, or any combination of reasons, is a sufficient basis for approving the project, notwithstanding any significant and unavoidable impacts that may occur. 1. The project will generate substantial transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenue for the City from the proposed hotel, which the City Council considers a critical component of the project because this site is part of the former Thermal Redevelopment Project Area, and as a result, 100% of all real property taxes from the project site must be used by the County to retire a long-term debt for bonds previously issued by Riverside County. Without the TOT revenue, development of the project would generate substantial City general fund costs with no source of revenue to cover those additional costs. Based on the City's Fiscal Impact Analysis, the project is forecast to generate revenues substantially in excess of the costs associated with providing public services to the project, which will help offset the budget deficit associated with providing public services to the other nearby communities that were also included in the Thermal Redevelopment Project Area. 2. The project provides a unique opportunity to allow short-term vacation rentals (STVRs), at the homeowners' option, that will also generate substantial TOT revenues for the City within a master planned, mixed -use community that is designed to successfully accommodate such STVRs with complimentary commercial, resort and recreational amenities onsite and centralized management of the STVRs. The project will also include CC&Rs, rules and regulations, sales disclosures, and community enforcement mechanisms designed to accommodate STVRs and avoid any adverse effects on project residents and the surrounding communities. This approach allows the City and project homeowners to receive the benefits of STVRs, while also allowing potential future residents to choose whether or not to live in a private, gated community that allows STVRs. 3. The project provides a unique mix of interrelated and mutually supportive residential, resort, commercial and recreational uses that create a private resort community which minimizes GHG emissions and vehicle miles traveled associated with the proposed uses through promoting walkability and non -motorized connectivity as an integral part of the project design, including (1) establishing residential neighborhoods that are linked through multi -use trails that connect neighborhoods and planning areas throughout the project; and (2) providing "walk streets" in the resort area to provide internal connection between facilities within the Tourist Commercial planning area. 4. The project provides neighborhood commercial uses at the corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58 to serve existing and future residents in this portion of the City, which 95 629 currently lacks any neighborhood serving commercial uses, thus requiring lengthy trips by residents to meet their most basic commercial needs. The project maintains the overall density of planned development for the site, adding to the diversity of housing, resort uses, and recreational amenities within the City, while also maintaining low -density residential uses around the majority of the project perimeter that matches the surrounding residential communities. 6. The high -quality private wave basin (The Wave) and Kelly Slater brand provide unique recreational opportunities for future residents of the project and will attract resort guests and create a landmark facility that will enhance the City's reputation as the "Gem of the Desert" and elevate the La Quinta destination brand consciousness all over the world. 7. The project will contribute to both temporary and permanent employment and economic growth opportunities in this portion of the City, including a projected 674 permanent jobs (Draft EIR, Table 4.13-30), which provides a significant public benefit to the City and its residents. 8. The project will generate significant funding for public infrastructure improvements within the City and surrounding area, including improvements to the local and regional circulation system through the payment of TUMF and DIF fees, and fair share contributions to multiple signalization projects required as part of General Plan build out. 9. The project will benefit the unique biological resources in the City and broader Coachella Valley region by contributing substantial funding through payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee to support CVCC's ongoing efforts to acquire and maintain essential habitat for special status species, and by constructing a sheep barrier along the base of Coral Mountain and the remaining western project boundary, which will contribute to CVCC's ongoing efforts to protect the Peninsular bighorn sheep from communities located on the valley floor. 10. The project will support and implement all eight of the guiding principles of the City's 2035 General Plan, including: (i) supporting "a fiscally sound community" that capitalizes on the City's unique development opportunities; (ii) supporting "a resort oriented community" that maintains and improves the opportunities for La Quinta to be recognized, both nationally and internationally, as a top resort and recreational destination; (iii) supporting "a neighborhood oriented community" that strives to ensure that existing and future housing for all residents continues to be diverse in type and of high quality; 96 630 (iv) supporting "a healthy, vibrant and heritage minded community" that ensures that all land uses cohesively exist with the area's natural, cultural, and historical heritage, including by protecting the Coral Mountain Art Rock Complex at the base of Coral Mountain and the remnants of the adobe structure located on the project site, which are currently subject to potential vandalism and deterioration; (v) supporting "a conservation focused community" that promotes the efficient use of water and energy resources through replacing the previously approved golf course use on the site with the Wave Basin and other recreational amenities that use less water than the uses currently approved for development on the site, and incorporating integrated design principles and state-of-the-art efficiency features to ensure an environmentally sustainable development; (vi) supporting "a safe community" through development standards that promote safe indoor and outdoor spaces in this gated community that will provide on - site private security and provide substantial funding for emergency services (both through payments of DIF and generation of substantial TOT and sale tax revenue); (vii) supporting "a full service community" that provides and maintains adequate service levels and facilities for streets, water, sewer, storm drains and other infrastructure, which here include privately owned and maintained streets within the project as well as improvements to the City's arterial streets and funding for areawide circulation system upgrades, as well as constructing all required sewer, water, and storm drain infrastructure; and (viii) supporting "a circulation minded community" that promotes and encourages a broad range of transportation opportunities that reduce impacts on the environment by providing a complimentary mix of residential, resort, commercial, and recreational uses that are interconnected through multi -modal roads, trails and paths that reduce the length of vehicle trips and promote non - motorized travel. 11. The project will provide an important public connection through the project site for the Coral Mountain park and recreational trail system planned for the area by the Desert Recreation District. Conclusion: In light of the foregoing, and the information contained within the Final EIR and other portions of the project record of proceedings, the City Council concludes that implementation of the Coral Mountain Resort Project will result in the development of a unique project that provides substantial economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, as outlined above, which outweigh and make acceptable the significant, 97 631 unavoidable environmental impacts associated with the Coral Mountain Resort Project and, accordingly, adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations. VIII. FINDINGS REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF FINAL EIR Pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council of the City of La Quinta as the lead agency under CEQA is responsible for certification of the EIR and therefore makes the following findings: l . The Final EIR was completed in compliance with CEQA and its Guidelines; 2. The Final EIR was presented to the City Council, which reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR prior to making its decision on the Project; 3. The certification of the Final EIR and the findings set forth herein reflect the City's independent judgment and analysis in its capacity as lead agency; and 4. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment A) to reduce or avoid the significant and mitigable impacts of the project. 5. The City Council finds that the Final EIR properly evaluated the project's potentially significant cumulative impacts based on General Plan buildout, and that this analysis included all past, present and probable future projects in the project vicinity that could cause or contribute to such significant cumulative effects. 6. The City Council finds that the additional information and evidence submitted after release of the Draft EIR and prior to certification of the Final EIR does not constitute "significant new information," as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, but rather, merely clarifies and amplifies the information provided in the Draft EIR. By these Findings, the City ratifies, adopts and incorporates the analysis, explanation, findings, responses to comments and conclusions of the Final EIR. In addition, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the mitigation measures specified therein, as well as the project design features identified in the Draft EIR, are hereby approved and adopted, and shall be fully enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as permit conditions, agreements or other measures. Any finding made by the City shall be deemed made, regardless of where it appears in this document. All of the language included in this document constitutes findings by the City, whether or not any particular sentence or clause includes a statement to that effect. The City intends that these findings be considered as an integrated whole and, whether or not any part of these findings fail to cross-reference or incorporate by reference any other part of these findings, that any finding required or committed to be made by the City with respect to any particular subject matter of the Final EIR, shall be deemed to be made if it appears in any portion of these findings. If any term, provision or portion of these Findings or the application of these Findings to a particular situation is held by a court to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of these Findings, or their application to other actions related to the Project, shall continue in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the City. 98 632 m H m W N C M O N O M C i O q�q f9 + fV f6 (B (9 >> fV >> C C C J f0 C f6 C N W J In aJ J h.0 N N LL N to 44t Q (n In a> v> o v to o2S o 00 a > 4 > +- a m M c > D o N i aJ m a)m C O [6 C L aJ u ra m m N zz N Q O F Q O� a s D M p O u V 41 C +1 C 4� C Y C U .0 0 Y C u Y C u qD Y C LO aJ C U C10 .� o b0 o o o aJ +, c -" Q E L f Q Q - c + ai o +� E u a 0 c E u +� a +� u a u o O O a > a E - a -0 U f° E - a -0 a u - a �i -0 a '- a a +� O aJ v 4- O a, a) aJ v > Z a, v u V ao o CJ ao o ao o +,moo L d L a L d U tJ E QJ -O 'O} EU O� aJ O w C tM acoJ -C C s c O c t a nL3 O C ai B V4-1E E O hAE m=Oa (U co N 00 O n v a E 3 E > }, s c �° c m a>n C V C ai mbA N c O o O O 7 O L s >. 4' QJ 4-1 o a, 4- c JX i > � CU QJ QJ aJ (J CT ° E QJ a u ¢ c O > 4-1 03 S= C V) va 0 LM aJ LcN N O CU a1 '} O+ aJ E Ln O Ln 4-1 aJ O LA E LA V_ aJ 4-1 a` s co i O l6 Q aJ U p[ -O O y C +� s O s a) + s o c 4- E� 4-1 a N +, °°cu C s - ° +, E O} 'a1 M o E +' > CQj D O C a1 O O U (n ZA in m N a) j 0 >i C O a> a s u. O •U aJ '} s aJ aJ U L a) s c-I a-+ 4) Ol O +� cn + C L U +•' L +• (6 C o a o � U aJ � Q, _� u > +C+ DD v� Q f6 `6 c O 0 +-5 O U �' C c Ln QJ fB C .0 +J o of +•+ C 4- C c-I O a•'i O n3 p u E >. O Oa OJ aJ u aEJ v N m sfN6 O E c p E +, bA QJ > a p aJ a1 } O aJ E -0 O a n oz a n a1 .E Q tia V ?r v 6 `� Oa Cl) N bA E O c N Ln t aJ > N O i .> � aJ V s > CJ O — t7A O O C C v V O V O s H Q m ro J L V Q O 'i V s 0 aJ L O p co LL +•+ rl N M i y iN W W W �r.I/ w Q Q Q Q V V Q V Q m 11 C C i O ++ CA O L +> O C O L 'c6 O n +1 acJ um E u +' cn L n3 +, +�-' M O C aJ OC a i L a, C- Ga = Q C 3 n3 m C £ O 5 s— aJ U a C ra > c J C c N� u E >. + � d u v v CL � +� W a) O > c 3 aJ s O �, c a M M O C Ln> L o J ° +: a O V .- o s aJ C +� u u a° aJ H Q m H to -0 0 C � +J C � ra ra M C6 VNa C V) c av bn as bn J J In C O � O 4CA U a-J r6 Q L L � O tLo o O a� O L SZ r6 V tan .� o v +, ° .E o v +J C U C N U C U U C N i L i p L ry v O M +J cB u O + a a o a f Q a o Q V a>, 0 V V CJ "O i a) as O Can L >� M •r6 .L .0 aJ O O C >, U N a) a) N Q Cu as L L Lfi c •� a�•J rD U X r6 L O rB •� N L .L aL+ Ll O Q Ul C 7 N as L u in O L +' _O as O +J O Q as " ate+ V � L 0 CUl) Q +J O H E ro y to O O a N > +NJ ra O QO L •� v v M taA aJ 7 Can s O u N+ L L} +•� +� }' O o O �/) E V O +, O L a L s +�J O N +, O r6 tw 0 C E U Q O L +� O x O— M 4J va C O co L 3 •L O L c L.L in C as +J d O •Q" 7� +� r0 O taA C N O Q Q V a"' �- bA L a) M L `Lu 0 +, X a) M - C L p '+,, N C ro >, +-� N VI Q ry -O ate+ N > r•/1 (p V 7 N N as +� r6 +' 'L L O a1 C as ._ O O O ` + O `� cn ca Cr c O rn — V ra > v M U a) ron a) a, v o " a, E Q QQ ai C v U c 'O s C OU o O ova n�C LA LA c opi L bn u Q L Q .O O - u iS .� +� Co O C �--� ~ +' aJ <n E Vl Q1 �-J v -0 Q) U L Q) +� + +.� � L L O a) Q °" im� r° u O v � N i o 1 : v E N > +J .o c +M o rS � an E v O � c U a L t S — S L ra fB w L ro — N L — c co C Q rn rU OU i M +J as G — +_ N Q 7 N— Co sra i , y to O r I a- N N c m N C U 2i 2i = N va d O E 0 O +' +J n C_c a! C -O rp `� O N C L rB y +.� r>3 L L N aJ 'O C �O ° O U > W +, rl +J L L ou E U o as v Q v c v U ° — a, �, as o •+� ry Ln a, a, E as +� m as E ° tan o ° Q s E v N a w° w -Fuo O— u o C .E c '� E aJ O ra a u v —= V .L >(A M- v o as c > a aJ v a, M- O ai v CL v ru a � Q) +J Q a, c as t O a o M O L C V O E E O C s �, ¢� N O C C° Q w oc (A M� r;, a U an v rn a V M v +J rya rhor0o 4 a a, +J a! +J C v C > �� O C aOJ M M C > as O E .. O O > M O a� a) M w n +J • L 0- U L (6 C O +.� 1 .L {n L +J C " as M •L -C �..� U a�J (6 r6 L [6 U C as >, +J as �O C {n M C a•J W n wa1 N c Q a) — ra Q +, O n as u O C:O O O C Q ON E C Q as -amO O U U C ._ U aF Q C = M 4- M Cr W L v1 Q U U Q O G_ Z O a- LU r) z a z 7y O z O Z O a C7 H O 4 C 4C� fD (a 4 V L, C J � N a) O -0 C +' C ca O � � L O 'E a� } N aJ u O p CL fD j O > _p CS m 0) Q v 41 in U 4' C L � 'p O A O N C O O `~ =_ bA O -p a)V -O `t w O w w= Q O '@ W n3 C O 4-1 U O C N +) `~ cu � _0� L Q v 'C O O> v Cy > O V,)bA — > CL aJ 3 .� N +, O a) +' a) '� v� Q O T CL ,v s C T U E ,> L O p M T O +� co O p U 73 C fB v� }' •L cn ca In aj > X + :� 3 E U L Q `^ ,� M � N O N _0 p> 7 N Q v N _ +� .2 aj " a) o Q O o p >0 O p" u v aTi C v�i o a,+, n3 �, +, U E +�4- E 3+� a 3 i> O Z C �m 3= o - o Q) O_ O O � 0 a) O —_ ns U � o +, C bA X �_ O t O +' N C +ai [N `� Q O E L p t 0 v a� Cj 4-1 m ,_ E C p N m v 3 'S p vOi O +- t N C (j \ E c�I ci O O Q O - o o � OC O O L T O+� +, — V) p i T 3C L 0 bA MLn O O () .0 C C O c-I ` L �n C +� ca a cb O L ro L •�^ Y { U N C p C co OG t N Q O0 .� CL v O Caj a La M-0� L LA C ara 3 1i taav) Ln C O t,t L a, _ m-0 o L. m!t O U LzL a a) -0 O 6 + Q Ma-- N O_>- v v T n�a1 _ N aJ V) 4- 0 m a 7 N - OJ —',+l V) 'a > >4-1 O LCVj +'+,p • p }mumL C �C ,9 ci ZI •nWNaN O b7A L? O O O 0 3 O � O!E v 'p�ldN_6pA n 0 CC O a00L UJ O O M +�O a V) aJ CL p + O vU •2 � p 1 a) ++ � U > , Q •� 'i O aJ T c N to '� +' +' M •_ E— u U O C° o=�= aJ a) CL C �n H u •� 3 .� 3 v v Q f0 (n aJ 7 Q-0 U 4• M H 7 c-I nj O O Q o U M OL p to O' O' Q N > Z) 0 0 • • • p Q • � �O O cn U L 0 0 0 `n E C Q V) Q CO � 'O O .� � c� c� Q Q O co m m v _� L i U O O +J *' h `n _O p a aj u O M. O 1 O CL C vi ai (U > Nai � ai p a1 u, aJ +41 > +J u C U CU 0 O V)i N C H m cu � LIl 4 7 R Q O d z O a- LU r) z a z 7y O z O z z O a C7 C 4C� (V ca 4 U 11 V) C J b.0 (/] c-I N O N a) m Ln a) `~ O p i d n3 O @ Q O � � v w =_ +1 _ v +1 w v L =_ > N_ v a) o c �; a) -O -O a) co ao _N cv ai V 0� @+, � E a+1 v °—�' 0 O o nA ° a, t 3 u o au' u -0 0 +� +° N 0 a0 a°, O '6 �D L c a) L O c° O L u O O t u cn co a) as aJ C O a) O � a) 'i a) Q u� L Q O +� Ou Lro L t C t C) O O° (B C +� o 0 ° a a) p 3 o o aa) a o E O �, ° L 0 0 = v@ ° = + ° - N A v 4; as cLOa *� 0 o °� a) ,, N •N 3 > °' v u N ov o LN > o ( O a) M - O v > O c + ac: O a! a) >a) +4J > O +'L v In O C� U O � )a a + vQ D XQ a E a(o) u ° Ln 0 ao4� U �i a) u M M +- a) a a m oJ Ln O O O uC + (0 O u > a) O �a EU _0 a0s 4- � O O +_ O �U4- c C +� u° ��+ + O v— O —_ `~ c a L O `� L C O p c) C H O L L— O -O � OL O a) O0 � +1 u 'n > `n a) C p 7 C O ° ° t p O ate) C Q @ .`^ N 3 C to H N u .� CY•) +.' L a) ° C as V) i a0 N >. +-' N C 7 O -O a) '6 L p z t C L N 'a 2 � c � +, O +-+ '+� p N O p} a E C +' O a) a0 C +-' a) •� \ C ° U (B E L O ca N a0 ° lD V >N i a) .° 73 •O +--� Q a) C p -0 a) C a) a) l6 v •O aJ •- o •2 -0 N a) t L a) 'N O •� C C (v C +' 12 (a +' Q U O OL -p L +'' a1 L .� D E a) N O 7 u N i (o v +- a) u Q > (a a) 7 E C a) M a) p Ln N O Ca L L p L p } V u v) (1) ' L LA (a W L V)L + 0 O ao + , +� aO L 7 R Q 0 d z 0 a- LU 0 z a z 7y 0 z S0 G Z 0 a C7 H O 4 +J +•+ l0 S U M C6 U 1 0 N N t10 N bA J N J (!) c > N O n -1 L °N O O •� Q s U (fin a--+ o� ?Q buO aV) - C \ M m c C \ L f6 C \ �-+ Q � •° •_ U Q CO ,E U Q U — U Q a) °_0 txo , 2 U Q> •ro _ O L a — O .Q > = .m p L a S2 > Q Q) m tl Q Q) m �. o- Q tV U U d U -O L r-I '6 `~ C m +' bA ' V) bA N N w C C `- -O V) O Q +' O = 'an L L +, a� ° t is .�, +� 3 +' +, aA N U u s t > o OU , tt: u ° - bn to +, v N O s C '° � cts O L _ V) to 4' 4-1 +1 +' O O > t6 U C C O N v @ s I +, Q s > tD s 41 + > +' O n tU Q CU ftf - S2 - f0 S2 s txoa 0- N tA O +, E qA N s °U O4-1 S2 N Ln p 3 CU CU �' O E +' O +�+ O ,) (U to CU L maic—O L U1 cn rl n +� V) N U 41 L° O cows- O tts n - O s +- O '- +, > SZ E C p L O s +� (U O Z .w U O O s c� v fE � 4- 0> N s O s } Q E s° v .� to 7 > N L L -O •+, 'u O O O +, L C +' m _� +� }' L s O p '} U O - f6 N t6 vi s LL Q N +' f0 C O L > co tZ O u s O to > L 4 ' - .� c� - L C v; N Q N +' L C v bA ra tts s O L tts N O its O s O Q@ ,in tea tts s - > +' fu O co s O p U 0 N qA � s Y C N } C 4-1 � � Q O 'n � +� +� p 3 } '� � s •(O N � `n � `n `n `_n C tb (U O L [6 � U fll N U L C L (6 O Q to - C to a t6 L- O s i1 ,� E= c p} s v p ?� C -0 Q +� .- O Ln c L U t6 > = +� �' `n >- � a O a1 C bD m 0 bIi C � N (6 4- �-+ Q � +- a-- •> -0 � •� L CU M tll L tU p M U L s a--� Q -0 C p C Q) 0 0 C C U CU s N U U i - m H E L L Q +' p tU N `n � C + h0 m cn E UO L s 4 +' tv +•+ L bA C O L (D L N cv a'' L n - 4J •�n - - �--I a-+ CU (U O a-+ (U L .- n CU - (U L +' s qA +' +� tW 'n U •L U CU N [D bA C > j C s >, > to - U 7 C on C 41 O O 73•_ W O+ coo N O OU O V U 0 tv mCU V ? > C +@ - O , _ C cn s Ln p N l9 C +' C Q `~ -O (U C - tb bA 4- (U cts N O > C n 0 U O E +� (U O 0 C- v�i co C Z, +� in N LL N C U, +_, s N a, � +� O E p M C O - s L +, cO 'p O O Q O C u � U (U +, v� 'O L. U f0 C) -0 N n Nai (U n> txov .. 3 v>>> N N � O O _bD '� G O-4-1 E E N O O L } U ) @ o O +� O O L L > (U 'v� [6 fb S2 c tU N p ttf N s +� .� +, n p C CU E n +� +, +, s C O O Q O E E ) Q) 3> L +-� s 4-1 °U E u OL °U tU � 3 N-> � i� i� '° -6 blJ m +•+ a: O .� C w � +•+ vi U .� +•+ H C O .� U cn C ,bA M 4 O _O m m 7 R fC3 C U- L O V) tU or C cu C O L O U Q O d z_ O a- LU r) z a C7 z 7y O z SO G Z O O 4 +C +C r6 (a fB r0 N a1 C1A a! bA J In J In L O N L CLO a) 0-W O O_ L '+� u4n N +— O - �_ a > a) r6 O O L O N a) o O ca u +- p w W C \ L C C \ CO Ln by 'C Wa C Co u f6 a m �„ pn •C WC + C C Cai r6 N U O a) U O — 0 L d rV O L Q> ai = O L p d L Q> a! tv m T 0-Q v ra m > 0- Q a1 d �� Qo cd j3� Qo O a, O C� - > >, C +J W O a, O au -0 -a L v T +, V) nT tin O +O' _0 c — cv a . ro ; p V =C O m N p 4-+ m rT5 � 'ry ° } N to O O v O O C p Q }L C ` C h U m 3 oa o n + a, O a! 6 a) ca anv - to L L .a U Q 3 v E E C Q� .� O O M p v C b Q p C +�,, C 4n +' C +� O of C 6 C W i 0 +' q- ra Q O p L T L C n Q LO ate--+ 7 U ° +, `~ — O C a1 O Q C C - OJ +' N +1 � a) C �_ ,� O>. •> C M O O L L L N C n L i. '� C N N a1 aJ -o U O >O v w —_ L W C O" p O +, O + O - O 'in ra L M _ -0 ,a1 s N i O_ aai ra E qn O a1Ln -0 •- C N a1 O aJ bn � Q ru ra Q C Q a) O ° N v CO 7 a� u> 0 C O 4-1 in O Q a) n +' nn L c O N Z3 C O +, p to c >- c O .s . O Eb O O O a) +� a� C O > O o +, c> .� o }; Q •t10 u o Q ° c L Q (A� o ? m a� u v U C° L rCv c on O L= .0 1 O ro .Q +, V O NV v V +� T L rB .2 Q U a) .� •a-' ate+ c-I a,,, \ C L cn mc h00 a) C >' • w V a) O C M fVD L 0= U rD O CL + Q +� +� V CU C Q O a J G aJ C C •} p Q w O p v O L O v +� i 0 T v� Ov N ru 4-1 v rV O a) OL p L N bn U 0 +� m C rn VE C Ln ++., w w co (v1 >- N N o n v W W -O p -O O p C U to �— @ .L O C O S C N V C +' O Q V) aJ O O v� +' rB .0 T O C C C v cO qn .a1 bD -0 O �1 i t .- a! a! Q p U,� >i > M s� U ro a) � 7� O M[ O aJ u a1 ^ O m� L� C V N p C u Q L m a1 ++ ++ m-0 L t— -C> V C l6 C t an a-rn m M 4- U 7 M 6i lC O co _O m .• 7 R O 4 C 4C�: C 4C� C 4C� C 4C� fo ro fo M f9 M (V (o V S V V U 1E In Ln V1 C V7 C V) C aJ on aJ bA aJ bA aJ w J (!) J N J N J (!) bA O n O LLn C U _� co C C C by '+-+ aJ O '� O (A73 by 'Q bA O bA O -1 N 7 +-+ O � bA to O ut 7 7 p U a a O C W aJ p p Q p Q O 3 73 C O O O J 4- C +� L N to by +, � L C U C c u C � v C p E E m Ai C Q (6 i Q n Q C i C " � d co a- a N > 0-U V > Q + p 4 J aJ aJ a) + aJ (, V O O CV a d O of U -0 V) a1 C� O v 4 Q O L 6 L O E L o +, v - aj V) L 'p cu L -0 aJ U L ate•+ U -0L � C L v� O L > O O L aJ aJ -0 6 .L a) � aJ t aJ E QCX vi Ln (6 O bD aJ aj Ln +� } L aL v . to of Lna--+ aj O O w N > C O n u O t O to -0 o o aJ aJ O O M bA (fib •L _ v MU C o m w N 7 aJ aJ a..+ 7 U E C)L C O aJ -a aJ C c M -a mbA 7 +=+ Q E Ov Er O +1 — — � Ln L >, — c @ v O V L v aJ aJ V O bA 4' 4J U t= 4- C ut o L v c u aJ c u E > U .� — io f6 O C ai a, cr C O -0 Ln 4' M 'o > 3 a, a, aJ C 0-0 v O O � O bA -C O co aJ V) bzf6 O O U .� o +' Ln _0 m LnEL E O `~ + O O E Ln O - n3 +� Ln 41 a) +' vOi O O O O to C O aJ m E O a1 O v -0O a) O O o �n ,O v +' U(A ru L v N O L Q 73 O c O c O U t v O Ov 2i Ov chi N O 4� 2i n _O m f6 v CU -0 aJ +t u o v L aJ C CO 4. v Q 'F m bD c o by aJ a; 7 c Y U 0 0 O co co Q L V (�Ln > cu co E �O -0i a) of C O C o Ln ro E aJ V)o- . LA C-0 0- o J a >l J -O U = J aJ d fo i L C O V) aJ O (p C6 V) C aJ Vf {n m N bo m Ln -0 L C O L } U — aJ >- -J aJ -0 c , " C:E aJ L 4- O a-Ln O N a--� Q Lnm(L6 M w >- aJ C bD U m aai �' N — O �O -0a) 0 O O aJ O 'V) co U co = — C O _� > aJ _0 `n aJ O .� co L 'O aJ .E O ut � U aJ 2i V -O a) 0O a) L V) co aJ l6 Q C C +' OU (o a--+ +co O C -O co .O co C bA aJ aJ aJ i O O V i v-0 co to C +' N ++ U a-•+ N aJ Q c�A — cL6 (o C Q .� Q C aJ X W Q C C fb 00 Ql a -I _O O O 00 00 m N N ON O M N t0 A L co 7 L v LL 7 R C 4C� Co ca U C (u 0.0 l/7 a1 O bA L > 7 C 0 U V _ CU L a) L Q a- L p � a a L U C .� O ca +, c 4, 0� c U bA C U _ Q a O � C L a _ Q n Q o aai — n Q O L +, Q w d V d C: U ci O EO a - ) bA 'O aa) C > )00 OC C(a +' -0O N v -0 s) ta C La) c � •O @�C 410 Z 4-1 M + b 0 � E . Ln aO _ a a d �-- '+ N a) p i M O V) c c 7 O M a••+ �bA L O *- d= O +�+ bC.O �bp L O H .O U a E w N i c ate-+ O () 'U H t +, vI a U > ._^ ra - _O M 'O co a a) U ca O a) } t6 C O L C a) qa C OL U L to ,m 4-•+ •L Q) aj �n V) C:O Ln L L C6 a) Q O a) L Q •0 a.., C O C Q > a) C ba LO O 3 LJ - Q � +, a � N p 0 4-1 � O � LL � �, � � a � a-, V) Q � .� •C � +�, O •� C � a O C C L�i� O f6 Ln U f6 `n a a-, >' f6 a) > bA +� C O a) -o U -O C O in � E , O p L E -O LJ a) C L L a in t O U L +' a) O I a 0 �p C-0 a-0 a c ', X > OL a) 4-1 1 a a� � f6 a O 4, L H a) d a) in U a v _O O L +� }, C L O C C > L to [6 a) -0 m a L a) L bD � a) U ate, o 0 L Q a-� ra a) C a ca - Q Q r U O U C m C O V) a -' + v _0 to rE ai > L 7 4' 0 a) a) a) •� O E — a) - N n a) a) a) n +' -2 w >' U N '+, ° O +, p V , L Q -0 O a) +' L a) Q- a) O O U m a) C (n t C U L C a C s bA L ._ U Ln C N +, Ln O U 'f6 Q M p _ L — C U f6 U U c L O C m '� U a Q— O_ a.i `.� O_ U p L a) is M C c •a) C w C a) o C L O— V C .0 C L Ln X s O cn a >_ — @ 7 , c9 a a) t= +•+ C C O L a +.+ O V) +, a a O a @ N � N O Ln �-•� > C M +, a) U j a3 C Vf co a) p Q p O O C .� +•+ bA m a >, « Q OL �O ON O U Q a) a) } Cp n Cl H a t m E }� a n ut -0 m O « S 3) a) N p L -p V� _ +� a) O a C C Ln M `� O p p> ,C C >- M V) 7 M u C C a a Q v> tLa a �_ O m �a, N O L p= M O Q V a) •0 a) `~ v C bA E 7 c 7 to O U c L a p >j a E p +, baA C +' > E vi 'v Q a) bA +a— p m Q N Q LnCC' u -O a bA O C vpi M p to O O C v Q a) m O O s Q s u �_ b?s +' 'a p +� O OL a C a t N r6 i bA Q v aC O p i Q i U U a t a) to , n d E d Ln L .- m� M H C m U m m m on O �i 4 Q N +, 4V c-I J f0 a a U C co � ca O m E Ln U cn 7 U •U O O u u C L v Ln a n c Ln (IJL L c c ca c a° a o v - (U �I C ro cv 7 R Q 0 d Z 0 a- LU r) z a z 7y 0 z 0 Z 0 a 4- C c a. C C co cu Co co O V)C aJ M a1 b0 J (n J In C O a1 O .0 a) 4- - 4- bA 0 > O ._ 'i bA L tin U Ln U 0 a, 4- m °' __ >- na c C O � a) C C u L _V a1 O C C U C C t6 v u O Q O c6 +� p m V +� [6 U 'i 0 U a1 0 Q Q a cLa 7 C v a d v p N 73� ma�� 0 c7 a V D U 0 a m c L a V) } h a•- t t > a, — O> +- a, v bA ao bA `� ai c O — L ai s c n3 c L V) W } O a) ° c co -0 E c E ° •� a cB N O m .>LA n3 'u co > 4-1 0co c m i ° L !A bA C Q S l0 �b .� 'E ai U b�—.0 (�6 > O uj a) N _N a) p O +- 7 (6 3 > +' L bA C6 O a1 +- L L H V) a) O U p � p > O c a1 s U fo U O N ° V Ln aj O 4- O L c_n M 4-C+ •p C a% •� L O E- L C i` V)a-•� L W L > M N s _ (o -0 m U �-- 4' �� w L W m co a) C co ai a) co m to O } O +- -p O � m U C L ate1 +-� � E L O _0 � a1 � a1 � Q O Q a1 m = C a-- C � C O O m Ln a- N O -0 U N vUi Ol � Ln ` _ •� +, O u to 4-J a 73 a1 u a1 a1 QI � ° i U 00 ,L C n5 U l6 +- >- a) [6 �— L m ,UC C � a� Ln Ol 6 •a1 O m +- = L O — O U u bD B bA > O O O � Q m �O u M p1 c � Q E O U U .b '� p '� N I � C Lm mc:Y u U a! f 6 ° a1 L V i m-0 t L p U +- L a a, 4-1 ° s O � i2 � _ o vUi n3 v O O Q � w •i I� roo U -0 'a U io o L N O N m m +- m +- L N U N bA '(j L O � Z a � +- ns U 5 u�� O '� �° mo o o a w D CL -1.1 �° a, c _s_— O : L � m N � Q o ° a bn �>— °; o v o an -az a, V) o° @ �°- ) v a v v 0 v O ai O Q t o m V C N« Q v L Q >. aJ Q }J Q �� V t a.., Q> L— (9 N O — N-0" w 3 N O N S L 4- cn �' > aj VI Q }, -6 U ai +1 m +- L a1 7 p� a1 C O C O C p H a1 U S U O N i v�i � UQ � OL vLn O L VI b0 L to 3 N C (� L (� a� M Q-0 M m Q {n �i Q m +- m N M J J D U CJ 7 R Q 0 d z 0 a- Lu 0 z a z cc 0 z 0 Z 0 a C7 H +�� C 4C. C � Co CU M ca a OA a W J In J (!) bn rV 4a > O -O C > O L s L a� > � O •C Ote., U a L M tl L a On .I m 0 C a u 4-1C m OA 4 J r6 LA OA O p V C C a U O L C W a +� +1 a m a C m a cn a c a .� L _> V �_ a a i V a C rB ry Vn 0 +1 rZ cc m Q 4- On a (21 C 73 -v a � v v M w Q H O V O rJ _ V w a a a L — 0 a On On } _ '° '} a Ln a -° a s 'O a s >- — a 0 O +, a a L 0 Cl) a a V) s +- `� s +� C C tO s C u C s 4- s a+ o :' a > 4L� co a OA = o_, L v r0 7 O Oa 4n-1 a O C E ° cO v °° ..0 +1 °' aQa D a --,.z to a J t6 f � 6� t r6 C +'' O v� s }' Q 3 C 0 0 0 Q' a O s L '� -' > C O L +' s a �j L C .0 i a +, N ru C + E +' O a .� a O Q a p +� a M ° _ -6 cO CO to OA �n 'i' O O C C= +' V u1 a aO s ca `^ +' s 7 co L p vl V [6 C as--+ a u v c 't3 a s C a C Q +� vi v m +' a L U rO a � E C a O-o N 4-1 w ° "iOv O 4-1 +'Ln > Va� ° a U Q a ao v � u a u C] Ocu L, u Q a s— O >bn _ a C u > Wsa)O aC) c a ° s a L a-- •L � cn L�, 4. u o O O a Cy sOD �uU C a 0 C:) O O O � .0 a• m a a .0 . -0 ac=u a +- m _aa wC cn > L C= � a > a -0 +> � n t cO a f° C° °� 4 VN L O n i+ ° L p O Ia..� O m a Ls'O Va6ra n - O .M C 4-1@ o 4J + p ° O OV O p N v Lf 76Qjm-0 m ,.. On O N V) o O �4-10 N CLC p u-0- -p - -1 O C bn Q)• +te a w ru o_ a o v> > � o> v + o (ZL OLa N-0 CaLCM o u X N7 O L sL u a L 0 0 C uy am sE a w -0 m M a-0 u a m m a a m a Ln Q L m n 6i IV J J O U U (9 L ° O a O O Q O ui O a N — _ _m C CLn O H C) u Q EO s L +Ln, Gad W a Ln a N -1 4 fb CU U V a) tin in C O a, +- 4 .>_ (An U 3 Ln 4- L C -- V)bA •O 0� N I i bD L C O ULQ— Ln -0a) v�C �OO .L�E U Ca a a) ) a- a,-OU va O > 00 ai c > a a Q � — w a 4 onQ a Q Q a (7 V w a -6 C L� Q) m — ++ C — a, bA C O a) QJ C C w M Q) — C v v O u t Q C O m jo� O N } O oO �° C p C 4-vi -0 a N -= V) 3 CN +-' L L O •� .Q" LnaJ f0 cv -C a) t O s > 0 0) 0 n O 4-aL c Q) Z _O+ NO 'Na a N U +; LQ 3 O C a aY a) m U m E6 V) Q) N> O O Q)O )-C O - L. b � ,Q U v + tab _0°O w N c a C bA 0 a, ~ -0 I� ^ ' o o-0 N ra a O m L � L % v +-� a '� _0m O � >c6 V) m cj- O +O� V) U U O '.F- U V) M -0— a 4 0 C -ra Ln a) Ln i ` O O a, �' j a o O O 4-1 O a) . o '� + a 4-1 L OU bA bd _ . —ai C U W bn V i> a M O 'oD t2 a) e N �p C Q) ta Ln > 0-6 U 4- O > O O+ '`) Vi v O�0 L> O OO � C aL _0 OV) > 3 n�> U OOO @ N 3 I v by'O Q p O '� O Ln p C +_U 0 Q Q)> Q) +' 4-1 o U —UCLLA a +� VI va ro > -0 a, C CL a)_ n _ 'O C C N In 6 0 O O , O U + CbA�/a > m n 0 a U O n Q) O v O L (D dA ° dA -0 — Q a u m a v L a) a cr c a) v m a c Q) • • N O W ai 4-1 .� aF bd •O C C C V) bA L m a) U C m O a) U p> (0 O a) 4-1 iC m U bOAa) _ ) a, OU0 > O LA to U + 6 U ns a +� 20 0 _0 O JO a 0 O J w 0 a L O boo m ._ v � � 7 R _0 v O bA C L t:�: v a) E O -a ro N ~ N v= C av —N� v o �o= o a1 o OL +,- _0 a) w a • v� O a) b- L O wA•a) Q — U lU0 cno vC, aJ ian) 4-1 O+O m'�O � .2 C o p .— :Ll O O L O 0 In I aO C i;o O LCa) m L M > O > 04"X a)O a) a) a!O 0- i +1 L Q) O O L L = � M L +-+ C C E In 7 •- � n3 � a) bD -O V r U aj _ m hA a) h �O m — -0 bA 3 'O •— V) Q in E C `� — VI C aJ to L C O 4-1 L O — 4, by a O 0 EO 0 w n3 — a) O- 4-1 E U C i O O } C Q a) V C +_> aj +� C L '� > -0 bA ai O Vf �i +� U +� t6 ., a) C Ln O � Q 1 +•� 1-1 C a) a) a) a) = W -0 a4-+ a) 4-1 Q Q M L O �O O -0 C v a > N O co E_ E a) 0 iUn -p C C as-+ U un 7 0 ° p `n t `� 0 V 0 0 cv a) aJ a) +� a) +1J cv aJ O s L co +4-1 '6 O 4-1 V a) •O Z � •� O � C O++ (Ba) -p OO O w aV C> L 4-1 OQv O 6 LOO O=aa4-sa4-XO aOaaL QOa 0 V U 0- Q U 4• L C O ++ = O aV CQ V-a -O .� CV- • C N LLn ci rf) c-I C C C (6 ra 4) a) ++ +- U Ln LnaJ V) Ln + o C Ln J J m M m bA fu C w L a) L ns � a � x v — -0(.n > C J +•+ a) U V -0C V) C n co - O d a) aL *k i i 7 R Q O d z O a- LU r) z a z 7y O z SO G Z O a C7 H C 4C� (E � C) C J � N -C O 0 i dA C bD L 3 C > .0 L O a) O MC M 0 , 4- E cu Q a) a 0 0 fa a) L a� O O 4-1L E +� _ +_ a) O u O 0 C 0 Q > ao V o _ � a m = a) ai 4 Vl 0 (o Ln — 41 C Qj L m a) a) `- 0 +, N __ > w = t on U C- W t C o W hat W L =_ 0 .3 _ a) ai 0 L a) a (M 0 L 4• O 'O bbn o m N _0 O O M a) () l6 O (o C > p L �O 7 �O a-•+ p O L � C M Q� l"I fl_ c a) 'L aOj v N @ a--� O -6 a) L QJ U w w C 'o O - L O O L Q l6 0 c-I Vl C a) p bA a) a--+ O a) t L 0 C a-•i C O Q U a) p a) > L 0- a1 a) t a) N ,C- E V a C C O '6 [6 C C O C 7 L (D p O U -O 4.0 N cn c0 _0 +-+ C C .V C p .0 aJ O .� > C O 'L +, c M 4— 7 a) a) M a) N C Q }, L 7 Q O cn E i� 'i t N to O N M Q L a) M a) -0 Q a) -0 C W a) O 7 N = a) E a) a) + N i C C a1 n3 a) a1 a) aC an O L N a) -0 = ai -0 L C L (6 0~ o W o M i M � i U p of [6 O41 ,N L C NO .�Ln C Q > L c O m a) m � C cn cn O fa N O t �-0 c L co n3 C N a) U— U U N— ttA O U p c a1 `- a_, O c c cn Fa E bA C _ L c a) v C +�-+ C v, E-o L +' a) ca E `� `� O N [a t a) L cn O > Y a�'n W C C L a) O 7a 4- Ln a) - n U n m " p f6 } a) m > hD O L Ln Q m � m v �, `n + u c-0 Q °° a) m-0 o �; C � —> 0 •c U c E> a� +� o c mLn O 0 Q a) C" Ln E o c _ +� -0 E a) o m ca 16 p E �' c a) trA Ln yam, E n O U } N a) +� C o L a) a) r6 > L } p o a) n u '� O V E a) o u O O a; E +� O m E n v ,n 1 p o C L a! i r + v a. ado -0 o Q o `° 4-1 c� .f° i M c v �° �+ E a) E a, u s o -0 6 of c a"i Q + C a, vn 4 •CU C a) a) ao v O j a, -0 o a) a) .0 > + 0 u c� = p 07 }' p c Q o V) v N n E —_ v p a tv C" N 0 +, m a) E} L]A O C cn p — � O vi +� L N N V> Q N 0 2i 0 E c a p +' C L 7 Q OU Q E L v C N Q .� E+ 0 a1 a) EO .p a) O E O m U UO L a1 to +� i N Q O N +� N vUi +O +� N> Q a) O 6 c/ 1 Q oC c6 +J C > a) O Q 0 a-0 Io E co a s () a V 4=1 .E • • Q M O W Ln r-I 7 R Q O d z_ O a- LU r) z a z_ cc O z O z O a � C a) +, ro C +� ro cB to V _ OA C J N O 0 U N O U ++ E p 4� ro > Q O} CLA \ �_ E C Q L 0 C � � L rSS � L d .L' O d to L' bA 4-1 C Co dA a-+ r6 � +� E n c E o C a"i r6 +, a C +U_ d r9 �... •U Q > Q O Q Q D v L d C>> a-' a) aL a) -La (U O U >-O to a) -a -O� a) >., V_) +iln OOO N -C O C o aJ a1 CL +' 4.' C) E O O O a }x Ov O V 0 ai O LU + u Vi O -a f6 L >+ U 0- s 41 4• C L roC O C6� V) L1 a-+ O O E 1 �a QU Q a J C O E w a" 0 Ma U�O cr O a1 qp U aj O _ L U• > Q O E aE a) v O N L Q U O• W W a o r6 a-C a a- qp U C O C L m a) > V) to C C a ro +' 'a O C7 u U! U L t o u+' Q O cH E E c O z a +� a! 0 � a E L E} t a A V +� 0 0 L +' C f 6 O c — aJ t bll > = -Z O U +L ut O_ C [6 C O C t 0 vOi 0 •L L O U E Q ,n Q V O Q a N C- C ro U_ C O r6 E in Q L +' O r6 +� > ro i = aJ N O_ �- C N a •� V aJ 4 J m to C Q OU — i L +� O O f6 > O O O a a) N � L O o a r0 =� L v' — E v O . U io N O aj - 1 O C Q u L a) + O ro .� •0 n0 u Q 0 'Z3 O O v O u U U N +� O E �. ra a } O V Q al O C i C L Q C 4-' 7 O i -a 0 Q L O L a" O_ C E cc G r9 aJ Q — V C OU 7 a-+ o 0 ro a-+ >O aN-+ C � a) '0 rn -- .O O ro X Q cn C L Q V = aJ E o o V) >, 4-1 O a O U (LO w L r6 tea E N 2 v (p L Q U L 7 L O_ V) C C C ro of " t V O u U cv o° W U> O— O 3 O C OV a-•' N m a v t N N a>, _ O O a1 ro v° .o ro +1 U O 4, V ro � U ro +� O_ O C V) a1 +- r6 F v s a1 O to O - i Q C E L .O u L `� 'L a1 L v U ++ E a--+ aJ +-+ da �_ -a �, 4-+ E � VI L rn V N �-.+ L Q L 7 Q L E v (O L aJ (O a_ 3 C 3 C w rn O u H 0 d Q m L U Q Q m> a1 Q> O E '� O 7 v) s 4J S s +• E L a-0 4� V o L O 0 0 0 E U O U6 s 4J ri N 2 O O (7 Z Z N C a o c o o a, r F ai > cow 4- E �� o v a o a, O C H E" U O r' m a i> ro .O L E Q �• L VI L 4-1 tLo C .0 ,O = ro E u E u C O v C7 in w ++ CU (7 c w a v l7 axi en > i W LAU' m Ni m 7 R Q O a C7 z_ O a- w r) z V z_ 7y O z O z O a C7 H C a-+ +� +1 C C ro ro M ro ro U s v - U +' 4- } +' a a0 a aA a aA J N J N J N � O v O ao W .o +' aA a c C .L U C a .i O 4- U C E 4-1 LAO O a O O L d L m a- Ln ' U _y W �G C 'n an L L C L L O U a +, U a Q a +� a U Q E s Q E E L a U - O (6 + a U O L - •U Q L a (6 U m Q> m Q> ro +� a 0- a > Q a Q a O d Q U ], a Q 4. a Q a a + p U p >, p O V � V +' a ' — m a— N c6 .0 a O Q c-+ a __0 a u h L W a-0 -0 a a to a ra C c- J -6 U M C a C .V) �-' C > 4- .0 L 0 }' >C: c p _ Q 4.1 Ln .� C c v L o a-0 o > 4� Z3 N o U coQ Q+, o a- a -0 a•3v ai cr 11m +, -O i1 co ; v O t -0 +� _0 � L `� v a ° c° �, a- `° c C L o a +' a +'' N L a VI •C N a •dA + o Q - a"' CaJ M ro U in a O Q- a C ,�% in i L `,^ Ln, Q 7 S 0 a Q >- U- C O bo O U L o Ln a 0 a r6 d O L s O +' ra � E OU O — a Ln a .0 s L n O� — r`o v u a > v aa+ — L a C >- O C-0 C a L ra E a O +L-+ L '0Ln Q v a) -0a O C p a Q L 0 0> L +� E c a O •L c a t r6 +, O 4-1 a L v OU a m i O O 0 v�� N Q c +�, U 3 O p 0 = v U- �0 C j` U = Q a '� O O 0 C m a L a 0 �_ = L t 0 'A _Qj >> ro a N ,+� L O ate, Ln C U r6 O o +� Q C � `. +� +, U O a Ln-0 � h0 Q � E c C C a O U +, ra o c =� a L C + a 0 'n u c s= a s c .0 j a 4-1 a a� 0 >j OL a c c N v � a E O Q O V) i U V) O .- E v�i ro a D- +, ro a O U a to a v `~ a Q c O O a O O C CL U C U +L O a-0- L a C Q L ra p 0 Q `� ra 4 O a c O V) p C N N to O O N O^ U -1 C O ra !n 0 ra 0 a E v la 'n c E U a >• :t a E c C a a > U 4. O i o t c .3 a a s a O aj o +� Q _ o O U ao c +, o x a c _ o �, 0 L 0 a.o a U dA c ra a +, +_ Q U ao .a " a x +- Cl .E v ra - a a C o s o s i a +' to E Q L a, u u a a L Ln-0 Ln a +� Q c +� = c ra m E E 3 E t L _ M 111 ri N O O O O Z z Z Z H H O C C l6 O � � Q O a a 41 U 4 ` '- o c n o U CL = a Ln ro R Q 0 D_ C7 z 0 a- LU z V cc cc 0 z 0 z 0 a C7 H O 4 C +-j 4- 4- C � (o ro ro ro ro ro (o ro ro ro M (o U S U = U -C U -C U = U 'L'n C VA i V) •� V) V) V) v (� a) tm v M v w v M a) w J (n J (!1 J in J (!) J i7i J In o O V) C a1 O Oc0 V) a-- a--i E 4- U > > 4- U > > +�-' U > > � + U U 0 o Q f0 3 v o> (0 Q m 3 v o o O O an v o v L a) +� U�) O c) � .v +� L ,� +� O L c p L U O O p L L ro O ++ V) M _0 O O L L L fl V) ro O O L L L O a c- L L O Q CL CL .� L m c- Q Q c- .L d L ++ N L d .� c L ro Q E 'L a Q m L M Q E •L (o 'L a m ro O O 06 06 Cco x 6 trA Y L 4 , C r6 u N GD Y L 4• C ra r..) u L l6 u N E N typ L i-.� c r6 U N t 4 Y L a••� C lD u � hD Y L C u E 0 a) Q C O a] C) `- a) Q i O Q c C O a) Q C O a] Q a �� a �•� a m �� a �� a �� a (B U (U U (U U (D U (SS U d Q U CL Q U � V Q a- :E 0-U a- 0-U a- :E Q U >, v v ), a) v V w v ), � a) ) a) v ) W Q) a-.� 0-p O O N 4-10_p o 4- a o +-' D- O u <J U- V U U aI a) O c L a) O 'a 'a > 'a qA c a) a) c a) a) Li vi Q O— O (o a) +1 a) 4-1 U V) c c U a) c o t L O s-0 v +� (E C O -� '� a) _ U of L c rQ +' m — C aj > •� •+,, w U +� +� O to ., U +•i >- O a-•� 4 J '> � a) vim) +1 > Q .L ice+ +� = m (o .O ro �-1 L a V) � o � o L O � c �_ +, C •L L � a) � a1 + v 4� a) L +, -O L U W N ) aj O N +, W D UE + M >4-1 6 _ U O C o Q a +aL3�) v o v-0 Ln , a) n o �E > E a•+ 41 �O OL �Q O 4-1 +' � +' +0 _0 O N*a' .00 ) •LLO C v O c u U 6 i„0C) Q0 Cv a1 Ua +rw� Ol�� v E- a '_ o cE a) L o � L a) U V) a) U �O 4J O M > () (6 (6 a)> V) W 'U O C i aJ OU — Q c O a) L L Q `� a) + O aj +-� a) � U — a) — Q a) -0 (o a) v 4 J U ro h L M _ aj m CD-— a) f6 > ai +� NCU Q Q +•� Q (Q r6 L N _U — •> ai L L V) �4-1 ra aj m 4-1 (6 m H 0 V) — C U v VI V) v N c bcn L o ro c f6 3 c L a) c a) �-- c> c a) E 0 � F, c t E O 4 c ro o O .+ c0 L U V) @ +' C m C V o o C N > c c U -O -p Q m O a) a) O Q bA -0 v V) o .a0 Q Q O •i Q OQ C ro O 4.1 a OL co dJ 7 Q N > L 3 0 0= O Q c 0 0 c Q} �) O +� '6 .O L a� O C U Q E O O Q O Q p +J C C O aI (� i--� > a) O +, (V Q) r...{ L L C: O a) E ro O O O Q a) C)LO a) Q a) ma1 O C EF u 0- C V)V)O L O U CL ; a aJ a Q 'E4-1 aj -0U -0 a U a) V) E aj 00 C c) -C a- -00- O O o t } 4' +' E O Ln a-+ O H 7 r6 v) ro v) r0 Q H Q H r0 V Q H H V ._ V Q Q Q Q Q Q H H H H H H aA (A C vv'i C bA a) O L •7 U ai N ro r6 L U •L 4Q) U Ca � > •L E to O a) +� C Ln U aU+ of U a) o Z5 a) m aj 'n a) Qa) U -0 hA OC .� a) 7 R Q O d z_ O a- LU r) z a C7 z_ cc O z O z O Q C7 (p Nn C a) tN O bA J In J (n u L 'u O M p 2 — a) 0-CL tOi1 U OL U 4- Ln ca M Ln a) C V. b0 , >� Q Q) Lnw C Cfl- > Lnm ° o C) 0 W U (» c 06 by Y `� U by C C U C o v a) Q C o v C a) v Q (D U f6 a) bn@ (6 U p tv C U CL Q d Q U >, v — W v > v a, v +� 0- o o + a o 0 0 L C - C a) O C on � �} « a) t O •in C •� C f0 � M O -0 — V L co " > u ,OE 4- ?i +� •� > fB w 0- N to �_ C L co p cu A O O O +� p_ a) L 'a L M O_ V ++ O O_ O O +� Q E V O to 4' L C a) � a1 C O 0 a) v) c-I ' Q vOi (6 (6 �O V a) a) Q +, C a) C m a1 L +� Q n3 O bOA n3 C a) L Vf Q = d U a) L a) > — n3 bA O_ ns ry ro U [6 m Z +� f6 O V +� C fB L O C1 -O O_ a) U a) t a o U +� > u -0 U a) a +� U E L ^ a) a) c •i N m j l0 C m -6 Ln a) o L Y U �--+ O C a) C C f0 +, (6 Q > Q a) �_ a1 L O C +>j " a) N +� d o a) M• _ - O — M O p O m taoa) _ N M L L io L C [6 C ai C a) a) f6 aJ Q >, Ln C a) {n +� m Q i"� ` a) Q m m a) L m �n a- U O C N V O aJ 0 v� '6 C d v O M O_ +., a) M aJ •> C d t 'n +� O Q a1 a) U a) C 0 a) E (B > ,} O N C N > W p 7 cn (p L a) > t }' •U -p O CL W aL+ C of a) C C N V1 C .V a) 4- O v O O '6 f0 p m C ro a) O u +� O 0 U p O C O d .v C bA CL L O� f6 Q +�- O Q h N i bD +� U v t3 } s Q bvA O a� 'C E N a) Up b;° — tD p E c) C= p ca a) O a) C p 7 > O N Q O C O cn ri r-I Q Q Q OC d' CC H H H 7 R Q O a C7 Z O a- LU 0 z a C7 z 7y O z O Z O Q O 4 +j +� l6 � r4 � rV r6 s v V V 4.1 L V) J N J (n J (n bA EF .v O O t1A C a) C v a v a o (U Q +, a)L 0 Q O o> o;(n � a) ClT d 'L L a �C L L +1 +1 a- wLn u O - LU +1 C MO +, C � bA Y L C C U — c4� — C- C U — b a0' UL C C 0 E ai E Q C E 4-1 L O U Q O 0 O C +� L U +� L Q Q +, L a) mL 'n a) +' Q- a m V Q• d Q a Q > Q V p o to Q)a, a, a, +� a) v rr a) Cl U L > bA '+� � o U Q o Q a `o V a a z +' C 4- 0 w v m +, @ 0 0 4- 0-0 a) on a) a) -a > -a Q) ,; a) (L) a) +- C +-1 Q) _Q N •O O 6 ai c>•0 C a) mE M ? E ai ro+) O L10 a) V cB ,v O a) N 7 a) > —_ �O{ 3 V O O p Q) � v Ln 7 L 7 U O aJ CA a1 CAA a! � a O iJ Q Q O C C Q i ,� Q (a C CiQ c L o L ccn J @ > O a) of fl_ bA 'N d ate-+ �, r6 ++ N N a) ro G a) >� r6 fo +, O U a) U a) L - a) 0 U C +, co: C O L aa, ~ U V) a� r) V �' > Q U 4• �_ 4p 'M O V Q u > a) 7 N X U co vi U Q O C L M U 0 V 4z ro O ro w N U t tLo to ro O O ro v L a) `� O a) O C V) 0 0 +''co +' � CLO +-LF- C = Q n a) C v ro Ln 4` a) > t V l6 +� +' .� V) +' tom) '� C ro •� — O Q j C a) Ca .� > O N C aaii a � F = n 4� [a) n3 > to a) m N 0+v' U -o in ) ro a) C a ai a1 o a O fLra oF C a) O ar U 75 C)OO a) 0 `�QO c CQ a O C O O Lbn +a +' C 4-1Q 0- U C aJ Q 6 o f Q0 p _ UM a cn V o in o Q '> L cn O C L O E a C � Q L p +1 m a U U C v 4-1 a) O O L + -a 0 aO o > +1 a)Q) v' o +' o A o ca�o �U � v O _ C r6 a) •L +- O C _ C > O (B a) V V co a) Q O Q u} V Q O O V O a O L C s c aJ trA ' 0- O V C +1 � a) O O 4 Q 4-1 Q a) a) O n a) 7 .� N p ro a) O O t aj -a > cn L cO vn v E C pV a--� > C > a) +L., CU � l0 E 0 -0 Q G r6 L '� E Xro CL C a) a) a ro L N a) > +' L +' ro 'a V a) m _ a) o a) C a) N C C O .O v 7 O o C o O i6 _ ro o V O o 4 _ to ._� .4� _ ro C E O O Q N -0 a) CO V) o N d d M a a) V d C .S C o V� Ln M U Q ro o O Q Q Q Q OC H H H H H a a a) � o c a o U vi O N 7 R C +-j fa s ra V +., V) vea in - v no +- L .j LO °° � U o 0 ra +� +- N W a1 L l6 O � U C U u 0 O > C E p U C E Q CL +- p c +� L } a a) CO V M L Q u n a) O V CO= a) V) O d > m Q u Q d to > Q 4- � U v +� v v Ci u +� a, a, a V O Q V O a a an an a3 > > O 6 O ro O to Lw -a O O — a) v c c a) ru +- a) c +, c s c C c c c s s 'C E C C� ro , tw — 'i fa 7 ra > N bA +� C U C p ' 7 N s +, C: cN CO w 0-0 cn c • -O + a p -p U >� • � L O C:+-=O m c D -0 Sa s s4 + p > -0 Q 4sO a) O_ U v) N a• +1 l/ `n@i O oC a O O a) :-Es p 0 Ln p L O O v p yaaa 0 > O aa)1 )> a) +� > C ra C s s to +, V1 co O U co 0 0)m O a U +o Q • +. OC Ln y. N Ul � - vQ w — w� L cc bCA c OU c OU O 4-1 � O 4. r6 ro OJ () 4- +� p= — ca > O a) s O s ro a) C C L p Lc a >- 'n c 6a Lc) (a) p ai V +LO4JJ J > r6Q) a) - O `1 U to arccaa) +U UL Q a)U Qa) Ou+'n LN +' +� � (9 a) (ID p o U ^+Q (iJ In `n +- Ln a a u L C) �U 4- 4JO a) (A O Q=-0 L c +, a vQ a n w Q p to ' CL O a p 'O^iO NO O ro n v v s aJ a) co 0 -0 s 7 0-i s -C a)aj N a) v 5>' 0 j c> N C s Z C ro i ro u v O Q O l7 a) C 4-1 ro U U ~ 0,m !? !? U -0 ra E U > i ra N U H — c O +� a) �n c i — rLo O +' al +� + 0 a) O a) �_ -0 +L a Ln s U ru s a OC •bA +O, O Ln a) a) i ,E c i C � U C ' •� _= U L 7 •E E O U �� a 1} �"� " 1 U U O w 'F •Fa .P a 4-1 O> C V)a� O °��<-0 .L a L a) v U ra E raza m�.�' U ra v� 4L ai r-I [V 4 7 R J In 4, U O w V) O O O a) O -O O a) O +� — -0 U . 4- U L L L Q O D ra O O = .� L 'L 'L 4• +' V)d L° L rl bA . ^ U — C m O Q U C bCC bA +•, bA 0 C 'V C U '� C C a1 O L •L � E tZ O O C ° — ~ ° L ' i6 i ° a ° Qf �-• � a) c7 u a)O a cJ u v Q v= Q a U 0 (> p L Q U D a V) — v c-0 Ln aj L a) N (1) — c L O U C O V •� •— M V p ir- ra 4- C O .L N pN CO Op Op a- > C V Q +`'n L O C)QCL'pt3nN ° a) C QL 'O O V V) Q_ CL N a✓ tr��uu�0:o c a✓ ooEj V; w O � w E L } w O p rl C V a_°l a) > _ � v N U — Q1 a) > p Q H O a) ra v F E U m V) Q ra L s +' V) C W W C c� H H� O O ra o a) c p 0 U a) O + Cl Q �a u Q a) � c m H-0 ;--fu O� J Q s C r6 +� Q_ C i V C O N C s m s a) m aJ L -C N mO O v> 0 V) C V E Q H a N of Q C L O Q @ @ O Q M d 1 a) N bA }, 0 O Q— V ro s L L— C C -O o a✓ ra '� +' +rO o 'C c bA -p bA o O pO c•V) -a OO a)O C C L L O E +� O 2 ra > v) +, 'E O aA v a E °; c " u E o Q) c O a) Q N U a•+ -O ra m ra H LA O H a ro Ln Ln -0 ra o� U H V) +1 >` O L a1 C O U +1 — +J aj C O m 'i C N C C o w O `—° a) > s a a) W° L bA Q U L a..i = M L to n v aJ a N '3 _ ca O ra > s 0 a U c `- c c N ra a) +� O L C co ra E — to ra Ec a aQ C:o 'O a, L 4-1 a) L V O L L U V) v bA ca L = rY a)_ ra C c Q m s d O C M p C i Q- > +� V c a) ra c) n O Q ra C1 > Q C C O L V C to u- � Q O a ra 4 m v a) sz + v E = Q c) a '� szt -0 a; E L U> o C O L O a) _0 Ln is O O o 4-1> a) v s o ff o4-1 c c H a) 4-1+� O a) c c Q c O 10 s v E 4-1.o a) ° L bA dA O co U aj O O E a c0) O >, CO- L C ut +' cu LJ v i V > a) 4- L '3 OU s O ro co Q O a) N ,n N 'n L v� C U Q E u o a) C V)C D [Q L ra U 4-1 Q a) 0 M a) ro N ro V) ra a + ra O a a 4� a s o� U H a) w bA '} 4-1Q C C O O Z, a� E - a) � c E ra s U +� +' O N N 0LO c v v-0 -0 +o o 1 v m N 4O a) m _N O a O Q M -0 s a C bA Lr C i m O ro - L U O ate-, LO O C O C > ro O O O .0 m O s v u cri V) — 0 0 0 - O V C N O m O O u a) Q) Q) +� L ro O N Q o� U H N N Ml a Q O rDn_ V Z O a- LU Z a Z cc O z O Z O a C7 +-j } Co CU (D @ S U U 4.111 � cn i Ln C a w a bA J N J (f) t4 i l6 � a a a O Q Qj O -0 u Q > U bA — L i O tw — O C i L L c 4.1 ° Vf m d U L1 O m .1 tin + v o a tea, o Q Q Q o a m — L a a o — a 4-1 :y a ru a � a V U � a a U o Q o o a a a > -} O tC >-0 tai o+1 o v pp mQo � 0o : C `� (6 U a 7 L O SZ — 1 a — 00 U c-I c-I O Ln m 1 00 m N O U oC m O O'� _a a - O V E Q Oa U NN 00 EO O a °O lu a Q a M Q M jQ Q� Q' � Lr � EM tm v bD OLn oc >N •O M W a v > ° V M _ bp O Q Xa C ° O a LF- t O Q (U U — a Q� O N)4A 00 a a) °On -0 +' . + m— >iri a L O t +' COMU -O C u O N N >� E O 2 � O C 0 0 N a qA U n ro 0 +� o c " CU o v o °wQ°a a"i a ai Ou j _ as � N -0 � CA O � L O OL c _ -0 L O W r+'a � z- a in in d L +J U 0 O >- Q in N U Lnm v� Ln � a a a O N -0 L= [a .0 1 .c -0 L Q +, 'n aJ , c M M M O N � _0 a a a a Q O t N O M p ° a O � O a�� N O O >E 00 00o 0 vi CO V b -O ro a 0 V Q OO c 73 V C O N O n � L o v ' QL a QY QL O° ° NOp 00 tv w Q vtxo o r .0 o o a o cu o �, m m c .° n a O +, ° 5= 'L > L Q { i v a— U X a s M Ov dA N a a 110 +� ° L N O (� O +� Y L Q; m a s co U O c V 0 `.� C O L Q O U (a > C p N a U O a i a +' 'O a u N O m L +' O1 E Q a O ° tw C O W L O O L � L L L L s u O L1 O a M 00 a O W In Q �, Z 2 (0 (6 tY Q an U Q U L2 H (0 a-+ M Q- 4- Q a-J iS +, M N L U a-+ Q t0 I� 00 OC OC G' U U CU H H H m [V 4 7 R Q 0 d z 0 d L�U/ 1..1� z a z cc 0 z C0 G Z 0 a C7 H a1 L U c — = L ro 4' 9) L a a CU +� �4 c U v E a � i a Q CL m > ++ a aJ U aJ V L-j O d = • CdA = -0 C:C t = = � + m >L n -O N W O : U�O a) cv +' +� O Co+J+�+ 5) 'O 4-1 O OVI ra dAN 'LL ru 6a'- LNci OLaU) L U 4- J nN �l6 O LNN�L —�0a, o cO +-J o ra v+iu CO � aO cu ra ,a� w L E(6 a4 Q) �1 @ (d a) � O : z) ) O I •N=U O C a� Qa� C n O > v aa- p r --Hd�LA C: CMm w p a O � CO C 0- CU to +1 +3 O a) -0 U� c O V) E c O p Ln M 4-1 ca c O� O M N+' 4c:a(Lc-oB6,J1 a! ° C a) c '�x J -+ a1 a1-0 +- Wm ru +cLOte�•�� 'co ro @ O L ° ai w > a Q a v U U rocoL 1 C ai >L E v O U �a Q1 ^o6cvO C: v O nn ° to c ° v vi 4-1+ ° u Ln v_ H+� v � ra .� 0 + -0 00 V � U f6 + U O-0 6 O a 0 ra ° U c a 6 L _0a) O U �, +1 "+, E`6 In 4 =U+L� + cn p , +O -0 U O • i cLn M L-0 @ QJ W -0O a -p N NUO p@ ac+ vc a ° c0- > cu a1 O a1 ' O=' O a)E a1 On+ dA 'LCoUL O +� am� nVI 1 te Ep OJ J c + OD 4; o V � V w )A o E � a va 73NU 7-o,1I a)N O a -0 c - 'O N U t m>v� O c p U L U a O UaJ U v� V n O +, +•o L > U 1 M'a E 0 m - U m m m w o 4-1 +1 V a) 4— a(A-00 +�m v W O ao a! N oE N O Ln N t0 A L m 7 L a1 MA a Q 0 d C7 Z 0 a- LU Z �a•�I V Z cc 0 Z 0 z 0 a c c c N c N C N c c a) e0 a) 00 v ao a) wJ (n J i7i J In J (!) Z5 U to Cw CIO on O -D p> p .c a) 0 -D c a) 0-0 c a) v -0 LE O + O > +� CIO > L D p .� L p p ' .� L O L +•1 OD Lnm U �"}1 L u 'L L L qO +•1 Ln �-- U L L +•1 d M Ln +1 U •L - _0 m -a r6 -- m d C L N C C c 0 Cw +•1 ra Cw +.1 r6 0 rw +•1 r6 0 Cw +•1 r6 d C c - () - O c c - u - d c - c U - d c c - U - v O ~ w 0 a u a a~ a u a m >- a m u a m u a m +� co >, 0- c , 0-co , 0- CO , Q V +•1 v aJ + v a) V +1 aJ aJ V +� v a� Q o o o V 0 o a 0 o Q o a a a a U •L 4- c O D t -0 m w w w- L N o w w 0) Q) O y +•1 U + c +-1 S +� oo co r6 = L }>' aiO V } 2 `n u a) L > + VI U a) M co c c c 0E c t U Ln r6 U +-' 'n LJ •Ll i u d -D Q N L p av1 O >� aJ a) c vOi t co o c 0 v C v> U c O L vi co E U SZ 2> H O — ro > L= c O O C U QJ Va)1 p u LO 4— >, Oo a)m a) oU U v L v O v '> o co v m m� o c a Q + Q U a v O n > p O b Ln v— u Z U tp L +.1 U +' c O m w a_1 C Q c O-0 o L v c 4� L 0 4-1 c +' �., U r6 O 0 a) p ,} � n L> U a) O 'Z t 0 w D 0 L [6 0 m m c U in a0 E +•1 r�6 r6 a) +�-1 U 111 :} c fE 0 >� N Q a) z ut 7 }1 ?� a) " — 2 7 t6 c c r6 i to CIO a) Q) N Cw p 4-1 L c L l D w O L � �--1 {/J a--+ a) �..1 L — Vl r6 U a) U •� l0 r6 j C�C > +J 0 a) aj L p L 0 L r6 Q) U a) C :CS N +•I L � U O u +' U Q +' a� E O U L L X > L i1 Z u N a) aJ C CO a1 a c6ro E c 0 t m a) c p Q) p - to } a) t E -0 -p n +, D 'U O aJ L O a) s -0 > p s L tw 04 ro � L a) a) CIA 0 > m � a) �-•1 +J D s v +� O M co c O n c— p 0 z p 4-n N ' � `~ � O � c M =c 0 ro O u ro ro u O >O u bA O N UO c co +s n '� -p tw Q �/ L SZ X Q Cw c O L co L ^ a) �O by Q is ro L a) a) p a) 0 Cw s 0 -0 ai X v a) Q) c L O V co +.1 L OrZ a) 0) C t U C i > N r6 N c+ 'L r6 . M = M +•1 > 0 (n L aj i O � CU > .O c t i-•1 T t 7 ro a1 '6 p t � a) 7 > c t p ro a) p 0 tw ' x +' +, H H CL c a) Q 2 C7 a) vI O +•1 t 4- -0 U V n v V N 4-1 ro C1 r-I r-I r-I OC OC OC OC H H H H N Ln O LO N t0 A L r6 7 L v U- Ln [V Lr) DRAFT COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 2019-0003 (AMENDMENT V TO ANDALUSIA SPECIFIC PLAN), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2019-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0002 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005, TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT, SOUTH OF AVENUE 58, NORTH OF AVENUE 60, AND EAST AND WEST OF MADISON STREET CASE NUMBERS: SPECIFIC PLAN 2019-0003 (AMENDMENT V TO ANDALUSIA SPECIFIC PLAN) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2019-0002 SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0002 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 APPLICANT: CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on June 7, 2022, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by CM Wave Development LLC for approval of a Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map for a master planned community on 386 acres of a 929 acre area located south of Avenue 58, north of Avenue 60, and east and west of Madison Street, more particularly described as: APN 764-200-0761 764-210-0071 764-210-0281 764-210-029, 766-070-0031 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766-070-014, 766-080-001,766-080-002,766- 080-004 & 766-080-005 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 27, 2022, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2022-011 to recommend to the City Council approval of the Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map at a duly noticed Public Hearing on the April 26, 2022, following public hearings held on March 22 and April 12, 2022; and 657 DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 2 of 10 WHEREAS, said Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map have complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 83-63). The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2021020310) for Environmental Assessment 2019- 0010. The City Council has adopted Resolution No. certifying the Environmental Impact Report and making Findings to determine that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the significant impacts associated with aesthetics and greenhouse gas emissions, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as Exhibit A of said Resolution, detailing the findings in support of this determination; and Specific Plan Amendment 2019-0003 (Amendment V to Specific Plan 2003-037, Andalusia) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Specific Plan Amendment [Exhibit A] : 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, insofar as the land area remaining in the Specific Plan will continue to develop with the land uses shown in the General Plan Land Use Map, and consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. 2. Approval of the Specific Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare, as development already occurs within this Specific Plan, and its build out will be consistent with that development. 3. Specific Plan 2003-037 is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties which are also Low Density Residential. 4. Specific Plan 2003-037 is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as development has occurred there, and will continue to build out as originally intended. DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 3 of 10 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said General Plan Amendment [Exhibits B and C]: 1. The amendment is internally consistent with those goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan which are not being amended, as follows [and supplemented by Exhibit B]: Goal LU-1 Land use compatibility throughout the City. Policy LU-1.2 All land use decisions shall be consistent with all applicable General Plan policies and programs and shall uphold the rights and needs of property owners as well as those of the general public. Consistencv: The General Plan Amendment is proposed to support the development of a master planned community, similar to other master planned communities in the City. Other such communities include Tourist Commercial components, including PGA West and SilverRock. The community will be private, will be surrounded by a perimeter wall, and proposes land uses that, as analyzed in the project Environmental Impact Report (EIR), will not be visible or discernable from outside its boundaries. The application for the General Plan Amendment has been made in compliance with the City's procedures and requirements, by a private landowner. The General Plan Amendment, due to the nature of the private resort community described above, will not negatively affect the general public. Goal LU-2 High quality design that complements and enhances the City. Consistencv: The Specific Plan (SP2020-0002) proposed in conjunction with the General Plan Amendment includes comprehensive development standards, guidelines and graphics illustrating a high quality of design. Notwithstanding the proposed Specific Plan (SP2020-0002), should the General Plan Amendment be approved and development under the Specific Plan not proceed, the City's Zoning Ordinance requirements DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 4 of 10 include high quality development standards and guidelines designed to preserve the quality of development in all parts of the City. Goal LU-3 Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. Consistency: The proposed General Plan Amendment will result in a master planned, free-standing community, consistent with the development which already exists in the area. The project as proposed will include perimeter landscaping, a gated entry, and resort commercial development in the center of the site, shielded from neighboring development. The project's perimeter and gate will provide identifying characteristics distinguishing it from its neighbors, as has occurred in master planned communities throughout the City. Any development resulting from the General Plan Amendment will be reviewed by both police and fire department staff to assure public safety. Should the proposed project not proceed, the General Plan land use designations would still likely result in a self-contained community, perimeter walls and gated access. Goal LU-4 Maintenance and protection of existing neighborhoods. Policy LU-4.1 Encourage compatible development adjacent to existing neighborhoods and infrastructure. Consistency: The proposed General Plan Amendment will result in residential densities of up to 4 units per acre, consistent with the land use designations applied to surrounding development. The project proposed for the site would result in a residential density of 2.6 units per acre, which is consistent with the developed projects in the area, including Trilogy, PGA West and Andalusia. The amount of Open Space land resulting from the General Plan Amendment will be less than that provided in surrounding developments, insofar as all three surrounding country clubs include golf courses. From the public realm, however, this difference will not be discernible, as the interior of the project will not be visible from public streets. Zi 1 DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 5 of 10 The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south- central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA. The General Commercial land use designation currently exists at the corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58, and its reduction by if acre will not change the anticipated land uses or character of this portion of the site. Goal LU-5 A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. Policy LU-5.2 Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. Consistencv: The General Plan Amendment will not, in and of itself, result in any particular type of housing. The Specific Plan (2020-0002) proposed in conjunction with it, however, includes a broad range of attached and detached residential products which will broaden and add to the City's housing inventory. The General Plan Amendment will not substantially change, as shown in Table 1, the amount of Low Density Residential land provided in the City for development. The range of housing proposed in the Specific Plan (2020-0002) is consistent with market trends seen in the City in recent years, including clustered, smaller lot development, which is also typical of golf course communities in the City. Goal LU-6 A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City's residents and the region. Policy LU-6.1 Commercial land use designations shall allow a full range of retail, office, resort and institutional businesses in the City. 509 DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 6 of 10 Policy LU-6.3 Support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City's economic base. Consistency: The proposed General Plan Amendment maintains the General Commercial land use at the corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58. This has long been considered in the General Plan as an appropriate location for neighborhood shopping, which would include a range of services and goods, based on the lack of commercial opportunities in this part of the City. As a result, this land use designation has been in place since annexation of the property, and its continuation, and eventual implementation, maintains the vision for the property. The proposed General Plan Amendment will also expand the City's economic base by adding to its hotel room inventory, and provide new and different housing opportunities. The proposed project includes a Development Agreement which addresses the City's lack of property tax revenue in this area of the City, by requiring the payment of mitigation fees to offset the loss. This has been consistently applied to lands in this part of the City over the past decades, in order to assure that projects contribute to public services costs and do not represent a financial drain on the City. 2. Approval of the General Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare because the community will be entirely self-contained and of high quality, and will be surrounded by homes, perimeter improvements and streets. 3. The Land Use designations are suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as it continues the pattern of master planned communities envisioned in the General Plan for southern areas of La Quinta. 4. Approval of the General Plan Amendment is warranted because changes in the market and in consumer interest in golf courses has changed, and alternative forms of recreation will expand the options for current and future City residents. DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 7 of 10 Specific Plan 2020-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Specific Plan [Exhibit D]: 1. Consistency with General Plan. The Specific Plan (2020-0002) is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan, as follows. Policy LU-2.1 Changes and variations from the Zoning Ordinance in a Specific Plan will be offset by high quality design, amenities and mix of land uses. Policy LU 2.2 Specific Plans shall be required for projects proposing the integration of recreation, tourist commercial and residential uses; and for all projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. Consistency: The Specific Plan (2020-0002) implements the policies of the General Plan relating to site -specific development standards and high quality development, and provides flexibility for the development of specialized land uses to the site. 2. Approval of the Specific Plan (2020-0002) will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare because it will create an entirely self-contained and master planned community that will continue the pattern of master planned resort communities envisioned in this part of La Quinta. 3. The Specific Plan (2020-0002) is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties as it continues the pattern of master planned communities envisioned in the General Plan for southern areas of La Quinta. 4. The Specific Plan (2020-0002) is suitable and appropriate for the subject property because the property is essentially flat, and development will not occur on Coral Mountain or protected areas. DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 8 of 10 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map (Exhibit E): 1. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, as amended, and implements the Low Density Residential, General Commercial, Open Space and Tourist Commercial land use designations allowed on the site. 2. The design and improvement of the Tentative Tract Map are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval to ensure comprehensive improvements and coordinated development. 3. The design of the Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Coral Mountain Resort EIR found that impacts to the environment could be reduced to less than significant levels, with the exception of aesthetics and greenhouse gas emissions. The City has determined that the benefits of the project outweigh the impacts to these resources, as identified in the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. 4. The design of the Tentative Tract Map and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as theproject will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality and other public health issues. 5. The design and improvements required for the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All roadway improvements, easements, if any and surrounding improvements will be completed to City standards. DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 9 of 10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findingsof the City Council in this case; and SECTION 2. That the above project is consistent with EA 2019-0010, Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2021020310); and SECTION 3. That it does hereby approve Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to Andalusia Specific Plan), General Plan Amendment 2019- 0002, Specific Plan 2020-0002 and Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval [Exhibits F and G]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California DRAFT Council Resolution No. 2022 — XXX Specific Plan 2019-0003 (Amendment V to the Andalusia Specific Plan SP2003-067 General Plan Amendment 2019-0002 Specific Plan 2020-0002 Tentative Tract Map 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 10 of 10 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California Z-V EXHIBIT A SPECIFIC"'PILAN 03--067 Aril® ,,kINIENDMENT N'0FA,NDA1L'L),SlA' COUN-1111'RY CIIII...,UB A Developajent by: SUNRISE LQ, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company FREEDMAN LEFF INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company P'repared fvr THE CITY OF [A QIJINTAI, CALIFORNIA COMMUNITYDEVELOPMEN"r DEPARTMENT 667 SUNRISE LQj LLC FREEDMAN LEFF INVESTMENTS, LLC 300 EaRle Dance Cr 23622 Calabasas Rd, Ste 200 Palqi Desert, CA 92211 Calabasas, CA 91302 CITYOF LA QUINTA COMNILWITY DEVE LOPMENT DE PARTME NT Danny Castro 78-495 Calle Tam, pico Lu Quinta, CA 922,53 MASTER PLANNING 11aitl-lowerton I 'Union, Street Fl oor 3 San Fmcisco, CA 9,4 111 ]UNDSCAPE ARCHITECT RGA Landsoape Archiloas, Lao. 73061 l Pasco Suite 210 Palm Desert, CA, 92260 CIVIL ENGMERING,, Watson Eagineefing 50-200 Moro ve 'Street lndia, CA 92201 ii Specific elms-' m. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1, Dff-RODUCTION' 1.1 EXECUT ME, SUMMARY ............... ........... 1.2 PURPOSE AND MENT W........... 1.3 PROJECUM. MG10MAL SETTING ...... L4 1190YWI'LOCAL SEMNG .......... 1.5 PROJFWT� HM, X)RV ....... MJX ENABLINGLMLSIATION, ...... .1.8 t.7 CEQA CUWLUNCE.. .. . �... , ,#,) # ,, 2 PLANS, PROGRAMS AND MADC LUM 11 'THE LAND USE CONCV, PT. 21.1 PimmiugAm Breakdown. ...... 2.2 LAND USE'. - .1. 0 2.2.1 Laud1h01GvutMP1",Coute%t ... ........ .......... 7.2.2 Y?jkdug General Plan,/ Land Use ........... -14 2.21 Proposed General Plan,/ Land Use ...... ....... 2.3, ZONING .................. .M. WA Ex"ing ZoRiagX. L3.2 Propmed Zoning w ......mM2,.7 2.4 ne 111,andUse Master Phut 2M LxW Use By Plouning, Area, ...... 2.5 COWULS110K PLAN ...... ...... L51 Offske Improvements 1,2.25 2.5.2 Onsite 5 Improvements 2,6 MASTEM PLAN SUPPORT, IN'G,, ELE-MMKI15 Z.6.1, Open Space: aud Reemlion - ........ ....... 1.6*2 1nfrwfi*u&Wrc and Utflitics'Pl"i 243 Water and Sewer Mon ....... 2.6.4 Ele�ftiefty .., * * - * * -, . , * - , , . , 2X-9 K'aturalGas ... ............. 2A6 Wtphaue, .. ...... 2.6.7 Re& se Collodion ...... �L29 2.6.9 SeW ServW *230' 2.6.9 Law Eaforcement.... ............. ........... .......... 16.101 Fim 1,30 2.,6�.11 LibraryFudidki ......... . ........ ....... ....23D 1 31 2.7 GENERAL DESIGN 43,UMELIMS, &, $TANDARDS 2.74 'T,IttS;VecificPI=034,67C4tnntoidty'linap ... 2.33 17.2 CommordFil'ArchiterAn,raland Slk, Guiddine 2.7.1, Tke,Specifit'Plan 03-4)67 "fand Coun" Club Ps'eftfties 17.4 Etegident ist Site ftituiug GAidefiaes....... , .......... ........... ..,...2.46 sp(wifiv Plan 03-067 W M. 2.7.5 Gradiog Design %ndsrds and Guid,dium ................ .2.53, 21.8 THE CORAL HOUNIAIN PHASING PLAN 1.54 1.9 PLANT MAT, ERULRUSIdV TE 3 ZONING ANDDEVEILOPML TREIGULSTIONS 3AA PlauningAns, YV ........ .. .3.12 11.5 Planuing,Arta,'V. ........... 3.14 33.6 Planning Am VI ............. ............... 3.2 SPECMC PLAN ANIE......... J." 3 ' 2.1 Specific Fktn AlmeudiumtProcedures N3.W, 3.3 0F.N$fl,'V'rRANSFV,%t PROVU IONS SrENCyr 4 GENERAL PLAN'(',*ONSI 4.1 LAND IJSU RIEMENT ...................... ....... ...... ...... 4.'2 ClWU",Tt,0,X ELEM1w .... — —.. ...14.Z 4.3, OPEN SPACE ELEMENT' ..................... 4A ',PARK,,ANDRFCWEATIONY,,LEMFNT ............. ...4,r. 4 4R$ INVMON?MNTAI, CONSURVAXIONELE MENT 4.41 INF"STRUCTOUF, AND PUBLIC'SEW(CES U, LEMENT C7 F,,NVMONW?NTAL'BAZA'ItDS;Ul.,LMIRNT 4.8; ...... 1"I'llwa 01.067 iv 670 n J { 4 ln�oductton, I .. qgq� III} 1.1 � FIB CU S Y G "file Specific '1an 03-067 Lq orpnizW in fow as,. Section - Istradtiction. M sex6oa providesm of the docuumtprojWt SeAting history, exiting; q rl ,, & legistativeut the specific, plaft procasmid thempAhod of compliantewith Ihe Calif , !.r° , Qu"V Act Section2: Plans, Pmgramsf and Wdeftnes. This On provWs the OTSW=tional ft=lt- Workof the LaW Use Plan tmd rclwd plan, eAubils. This smtkyn establisbw the land %Lsa poh. cy for the Specific Plan 03-067area and provides the design guidelines h et, desip and. development miteria and dimchcm forindividual projocts wilhfti,thep(,Kific Plan boundary. Subsequent g g ofW Specific Plan docamwnts, wpmte Use Pexinit, appbeationowfll b filed Wh" � will elopcrime , for the golf of l a su d buildinp, residenfial units, and supportiq twintenance facifity, 3t Zouing sad Development RqpAxtions. This section tab °appli- cable lam " "fin t1w Spwifio Plan 03-0676 uw men , ion are sentsented foreach Plsnping Arm widTin tht Specific g rya Section 4: G erw'Pba Consistexey. This sektion uses the key land us* ismm statement of Mh elegy City of La Q. Geneml Plauos e Specific elan wide the City of La QrdnlaGc=W MaL a ic Plan 03-067 1 671 4, I 1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT The *cffio Pla, prewnted hemin is a oompreh=we pla=4 and developma documw itftn&d to guide development of Juds within the Specific Pla 03-,067 area boundwy.This doc-' ument establishes devetopment plow, guidelium, and itgulations for the project plan area a�nd specifies developmmt ariwia, Av vations use pazit eabdommu schedukd to be developed within tile plan am& This dowwwt is irAeohd to iusure a high quW* of developmeut t with tae goals, objectives, and policies of the City of La Quinta Getwal Plan and the goals of theSunrise LQ, I'LCI and Freednian Leff Investments, H.C, developers of the property. These goals include: tmplementafion ofa plan which, wwpims. and whmer pDssi* psftctsft enviTwwetwW cbxacterisfics,of the property; Creation of a community with a bal of appropriate land ims and a rage of housing types; Development of complementary mweationa( and commercial facilities wWch MU aervt a range of' housing typ", Development of a cointawaity which providei a -safe, seoure and coologicalIly sound tiving environment. RK011HAYWHI) OUL4 JV10 voulan UVIO This document removes all land area West of Madison Street from the existing Specific Plan land area, which is concurrently being processed as "Coral Mountain Resort" Specific Plan by CM Wave Development, LLC. 1-2 Sp�ia Pl&uOS-067 672 1.3 PROJE CT REGIONAL SEITIN'G ® Initial Speciflio; Plain approval refaied to as SP218 ftpprovod in Riv=ide Counly, waslocat- ed within, flie Ownty of R6�erside, in tbeCoachella'Valley south, and east or die City xifLa. Qnine, The Santallosa Mawft—ins, are 1000W to the, NvesIt Sea to, the sm, kheast atid Littlo Sam Bernudino Mountaius, to, Me norlhomt, 11ae prqjeot site included 1,280 acaes Vaurkd,tea the north byMenue, 518,,qou& by Avenue 62,wvqt of Jackson Strect and, ewt ' of.LaU Cahnilla Cowity Park, The projwt site is located. on the U.S. Geologicul Survey tadiju, La Ouinta, Mardniz.Mountain and Valerie Quad mngle Maps, including paths, of Sections 26,27,28, 34, and ,35 ofrownsluip 6 South and Range 7E%sk. San,�Bemar&no Base, and Meridian. fit 1,999 ft projoot wasmw ed 1,0 "Coral, Wunt*7 after a S1 Faffic" landfonn wbith, has been, histotically refer to as"Coteal Rgef MDuuWU'L'* This sWuRicank geOlOgiCUI ftAtUM fQrUls PUt of wha,t is referred, to as tho "Retut iant of Anoioat Sborclie oM tholftc=tiM &'11Wm1ghflEW,0 Map of Desert cur imunitiC& of Land Nfanqotnent (BLM) ownersWp. The resulting dheeke6oarout outarnRivemide Comity., The Coral Mountain Specific Plan Amendment I (Original Specific Plan) included 1,280 acres of flat, slightly sloping land. Approximately 355 acres have been added to the plan area bringing the total acreage of the previous plan to roughly 1,635 acres. The elevation ranges from approximately sea level in the western portion oft a site to 90 feet below sea level in the eastern portion. sPeific Plan 03-067' 1.3 -------------- - 673 1.4 PROJECT LOCAL SETU NG I I The Andalusia Country Club Specific Plan boundary is within the City of La Quinta, a 31 square mile municipality located in the southwestern portion of the Coachella Valley. "I'lle City, which was incorporated in 1982, is bounded on the west by the City of Indian Wells, on the east by the City of Indio and Riverside County, on the north by Riverside County, and Federal and County lands to the South. The amended Specific Plan project site as provided in Amendment V is now generally defined by Avenue 58 along the Northerly boundary, Monroe Street to the East, Avenue 60 to the South, and Madison Street to the West. FZ07�111 � MME Specific Man 03-067 is ale from Intersuft 10 by way of Jofferson Street. sDn or Monroe StreeL The Specific Plan 03-067 prof ea continues the impl=wtaOn of a ne'twork of Gentral Phan mads and iufrwUudmv within the Uty's Mister Plan f(w development and exemphfies a quality of gwwth that raiterates ft City" s emerg as a desert resortommunitywith the highestt Man- dards for reml residential and recreational dmlopuwt Speoiha P6xx 03-067 674 7- uses. Low Density Residential (LDR) uses are proposed and existing to the north and south of the property. The property west of the project site is proposed to be designated Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan 2020-0002 having a variety of land uses consisting of Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Resort and Open Space (Recreation) as proposed by General Plan Amendment 2019-0002. C i Q i i n t a Gemral Plan ProfoTed Und We Map row„ 51160ifia Plan 03-0617 675 1.5 PROJECT HISTORY A Brief History of the Original Specific Plan's Previous Entitlement The property is currently approved for various uses under the name Coral Mountain Specific Plan Amendment I "Original Specific Plan". This Specific Plan is an amendment to the earlier approval document filed in the County of Riverside known as Rancho La Quinta Specific Plan 218. The Original Specific Plan under Amendment I incorporated 23 acres of Commercial Use, 689 acres of residential use and associated land, and three golf courses on approximately 567 acres - all uses totaling approximately 1280 acres. The portion of the plan south of Avenue 60 is currently being built out by Shea Homes and addressed in a separate Specific Plan under the name "Trilogy at La Quinta, Shea Homes Community". The Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment II delineates a bifurcation of the "Trilogy" plan area south of Avenue 60 from the land area north of Avenue 60. The area north of Avenue 60 will use the name Specific Plan 03-067 while the area south of Avenue 60 will acquire the name "Shea Homes" and will be developed within the parameters of the Original Specific Plan Amendment I document. This Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment V delineates a further bifurcation of the remaining property, removing the land West of Madison Street from the land East of Madison Street, which has been developed as Andalusia Country Club and continue to develop under the parameters of this Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment V. The land West of Madison Street will develop under its own parameters through a new Specific Plan 2020-0002 known as "Coral Mountain Resort" by CM Wave Development, LLC. See Exhibit, next sheet. 1.6 Specific Plan 03-067 676 M "I"he r1levelupment planfor (be Specific Mw 03-067 Amendment V plan area includes: T'he develapnient of a ebainpionship golf cou;anrl Club amewdes; 4 11c dzvelopownt of 650 rosidenfiat afts,-, M The developaiml of suppoitiug, uftimMirtme, to asuure adequale faaffifies arid mwises, PI?*P*qFT, a111,81 tKI8 r*tJIJT9V ri MI Specitic Plan 0-0617 677 ll 1.6 ENABLING LEGIS'LS110N The auftritv to, prqxrc, adopt. and implmeM the Original Specific Awl is graWed to the City of La Quinta by the C WifbTnia (jovernment Code Criff e 7, Division 1, Chapter 3,,, Article 8, Secdons 654 50 dirotigh 65457). As m�th Gemal Plansi the Planning Com=sion must hold, a public hemiag, befowit can ium.mend to the City Cauncil the adoption of a Specific Plan or an aenftent thereto, The City Councfl of'La Quinta nmy adept a Sped& Pla, a, d/or an tum, adw-Mi to, tho, Sper.ific PIMI''lly, Wier O'Mil=Geor MwIlIfica), Tht Specific Yim 03-067 is a, regulatory document I* once adoptoct, will serve as the General Am, the Zoning Ordinum, and Develapmnt Cod; (Spwific, Plan) far Ora amended plan area, As mch,, the, ado pW,'pW,,oncc incorporaied bry" rderce, makes cmisistent,tit eLa Qhmta General Plan, Upon coniplefion of Ole SpecifloPlan a=,ndment and, 4,dD)?ti',on,process.,,fi"itTire dev'61opmavi'must be consistend, wM USpecifir. Planand amendments fberetc, $pamkim P6,n aq-07 678 1.7 CE QA COMPLIANCE Specifir Plan 6-067 The following swement addFoss die, Cilyof La Quinla.'s mponsibility to addims, CEQA ceta- pliance ba the. pa4varation of ia Negafive Declaration, of envirotmenW impact (NEG-DRC). OUP sped'ifia'Plaxi 03-067 Im 679 Programs and Guidelines J 11 THE LAND USE CONCEPT L Residential Uses The project encompasses two residential "neighborhoods" located on the East side of Madison Street. "I'he main "neighborhood" is envisioned as a private country club featuring an 18 hole championship golf course and corresponding low density neighborhoods, with another smaller "neighborhood" envisioned as low to medium density residential units next to the club house and its recreational facilities. Producl, types itay ID, cludo, delAclhodl and atb6fiedurIts. kewldmlial develqpxcent to andeipated to, ocew over, appm,gym stely SOIA oF the unk acmqo within the �*,cifizflan area wilm tht balwca ofthe paqw%y In open %MOCR g0lf COMO, Md, Otbff TWMOCA, W$Od TOM WC 2. Commmiff W1118c Commarial drvol qpment ia, proposed to 'bo kwatd m,u N7proxfiwfcIy 4. 55, arres af laid ImAted on, the, Saa aumur arMStrmt andAywoe, $8, Con==W, dovviopxntwill oonsbK Df a mixtam of cmrwazrJAI retag ®rd rwitrdated conanerdal dmJoPnk-,W. 11, is im&A� pited Lhat dw c(x=cmW totad dtv6,kT=d 41 iwtu& both, noighbodload cannuricW, arul UX sevhng Wimm"dw, mm, 3. Parks/ Open SpaW Recreadon, The pftaty recrudcud wipponeatof the dwolopmentwinbo an golf In additickftfbmivau 8, reemObin"I 00,TDPOD^- 010 Plf Courso W UR alsopwvide, a Wri"'Sual, 11menky Withi"'A the Spwiflc 71az) wea wit'll, tit, sigW71=1 numbar Of rosideft)6al its having raaapu tarp "tut tWa taaraa isqbvwn 011,&*MhAer Plan gvepM t u,withiwilteSpecifloMm area may haveaddi- donal rematicmal fimaldos incilhAing lewdsand swimmhV f1wflilim. 4. CirOUIu, to provi& ft Oems to tea o "Sped6c,puz, wta. Tlxse roaderr gys iwlude Aye nue 60, Avame 5S,, Avenue 62, M° )aff& Strett and MWison Stm, I lbat i*uul eiroulabion system, wiH 00ma;iSt Ora saran of loop nm& provi& gwo ma to the individuW residwdal and, Jumtional, antg Witilih, dw SpocirloPlan Are& Additk I bafkrinatkin is, tar oviAtad, W t1w, Ciroulafion el= ant of fts 4ocumwt. in, Sev,,dim 23., Sific Plan 03-0,67 21.1 680 2.1.1 PlartningArea Bp-eakdmwn The Specific Pan, 103-067 tlw pW'i arca, ir'ao,six distinct sul") areas,.with, corrclspondir-ig "'sile driven" a'rid design eri�eriri, "I"hese Plarini'ng Areas are depicted in Exhibit sliowi"i belo%kr, Platming Areas 1trithin, the Specific Krim 034),67 Covinmunify Nwtning Ama I k charazterized by the club fkdities, suppofting parkitig and circulption elements, and emociated, opm space, aren- Pl,arining Area, 11 is, defined by villa residenfial dwefling ranks of one and two mries with, asso,ciated pools arid open spNnte arems, Planning Aren III is defincd by dwelling product types ofonLc mid tmr, stories with rnn cnd idttnndl Pou1s, spas and opert space! arvas, Planning Arva IV is dermold by Pie goff andopan sprace traintenatwe (b6li'lies. Planning Arur V is definc;d by Ric neighborhood com,nicrcial sitcand its suppoiling parking, and eireulation, elements. 11annbafg,Area V1 addre&qos goffmur,e areas and the primary stminmuer mum,,igement and retendou� Zone Offfit Plan "irea, rou Chalo & KLU CcLxx Anund(ws M00fawdy R6,450mW Uto Knitum"Cal uTw ("Imu & ("")Fv n rqm' Or Slawwin wme, w"O'himewo,'r c"mmerja (""'Du Courou 2,2 SPecific Platt 03-067 AM 2.11 Land Use / General Man Context Tho Specific Plan OM67 arnendS the original Specific Plan and implements the City of La Quin% Gewral plau ley bring ais, to this dearil ed polides and regulationsinlo a foCiised del- qpalmilplan for the specific Plan area. The Specific Plan()3-067is as reguialory documerit which, when, adopted, by the Cir Council, ofLa Quintagowe c= all fWal of projvct development in0jud- ing the disbiNfion of land uses, location and sizing of ruppc&ng inftastructm, Lu, well as devel- opmaeut ",duds mid regulatiom fDruses wiWnthe plan area. 71w locatiork and, a1gnment, of the land, asses and zones depicted herein air, diagraimuaficThe pmcisc tayaut vabirt subsequent site developinent pamit applialions, for theresorl residential Uwt clusters, Tecreation zMeakies "d (Aubbouse wid, saga pion, facilities will doternioc the actual abignmicut, and adjamncy ofeacit larid, um ontegory. TW,o Specific Plan is prepared as a link baween 11c La Qidn% GeacrW, Plan andi subsequsat fix individual plimuAng areas within the Specific Plan 03-067 'IU Land (hm klwmeotof the La Quinta General Mari identifies ardcstabli slits the City's polkp� relative to the -planned fiAure patl=4 inionsity, derwity and relatimnships of land asses in 'the City as, wc1l as iu the Specific Plau 03-0,67plan, area addrewed hewin, 11c purpow (ifhe Land Use E1,01nont Within the City's General Plan is tea establisli, official City and, plan area policy wlgoh.- Identifies IN. gencra,l typ�o, locations and distribmion, of land usm,&sixed in La Quinla at, buildout, Idlentifies stwidwds fbr land uses relative to, population and. building dengity/intensity and the character and oompa6bflifof] wd useww, Identifies desired courses Dfiwton,/ stral4es which provide tht meaos to, implement the conuminity's IwA um puWies winle irriplmneating: the speciflic plam 'The Specific Plan, 03-067 establishes, consistency with and implewentq the CiP's OenerM Plan hy: - Specifyingthe land uses, in, the: plan area; - Delineating standards for twid, am compatibility with One City's pc4icies; Providin,pp the framework,for development in an orderly, nunner, Making Consistrtat Ome, Uenerd Plan Land Use axad Zcx =,g Category for the proparty, and the City's General plam Spmfic Plon 03-067 AM 2.2.2 Exisfing Guieral Plan / Land Use The Exkfinl,; Gential Kan/Lama" : Use, fisr the Playa area it Iow Densi'13, Rc3,;idtr.tv6aI :allowing 2-4 Dwelling'Units per acre., Th* actopted general plan. and, corresponding zonc c1assificalion ror Medium and Low Density Rosidential, - I'MR allowv fur a vuriely of howsing types and �si,ippoding land use, witlliuthe, iresl- dential residential iise. Golf" usf-, is camrifly allowed ResidentiaJ Land Uses Low Do is Re-sidantial -- LDR Mtdium density Resid. mHal -,MDR, Open Space Recreation - OSR Major C'mmucity Faojhty -, MC Commercial Land Uses General Commercial - GC M �lPeT;ifk HUH (0-067 AM 2.23 Proposed Generol, Plan, J'Land, Use The prqpose(i for LoNvD mityRassidental, land, us'f'� allovingupto 4,DweftgUnip pex'acre aswcll u, a site fora General Commercial use: M Thep d'opted Dena al Plan classificahon (br Low Doi.).9ity Residential - LDR, rdlows fbr a vanety othousing typos and supporting fandrise wmn aic is density residQuUal residential kmTbz, ftdopted CiDneral Plan c1assificafion, for General DonlMoir-ciaJGC Allows for limited, range of neighborhood seer ing commercial uses. Proposed Land Use Low Density, Residential — LDR General Commercial - GC Open Space Recreation (Golf) - ®SR Spccifie Plaii 03.,067 2.5 M. 2.3 ZONMG I-Exis(ing Zoning corresponding zone clomdfivation for mess dentia), cominivifty, Facifihics, and golf'oourse Ilse aflows For a vaticty of' hausiflg � q WIA SiqlVoiling land u,-,f, withfii the plan, area, Residential Land lNeN Low Density Residontial -JR.11 Medium Densily Residontial - RM, Goff,cours,- OC MqjOr Community Faduty - MC Commercial Land Uses Neighborhood Commercial - CN 2,6 Srvo,flic Plan 03-067 AM 2.3.2 Pmposal ,Zo, sing The proposed, Zoni`ng fbT 9w plan =*a inclmdea Low Density ResWenbal (1,U.) allcv6gup to 4 dwelliq mils per acre and, Neighborbood Commmial (CN). The corresponding zone oWsification fbx Iow Density'ResidentW - RL allows for a vanety of how ing -types and soppartingland, use within flie km density msidentiM use,, 71ie C4uTc-qpQndirg zone Classification ibrNeighborhood ComerCial (CN) allOWSfor flimitedvar*yof mnumr� cial ;mid usa mid suppml fauflides wi,611 the neighborhood Commercial use. Zoning classricatious Low Density, Rzsideritial — IM NcighbOT-hood (3411111seer cial (CN) Golf Course - GC SPBOifiC Plan 03-067 21 M. The LmW Use Master 'plan %rthe fifth arnendinent to ilie original Specific Plan reflects the development goal of providing a variety of residential units it a secluded setting of a diarnpiwiship Solf course and other private and sem, i -private rwrearional amenities. I The Land'Use Masle�, Plan graphically delineaWs the proposed uses located within, each plannni ng ,area of the overall amended Sperific Plan, The Master Planincludes corapbrmcatny architecture bi, all product ty1n,.9 and, comtnoniarca buildings and club facilities as well as a hierarch "landscape set"backs, pedestTian. areas,, and connecting droulation systetuns for pedestrimis, bicyclesand cails, Developmeat ,regulations for each planning area are piesented, in Section 3 — Aning and Developwne Reguialions, The Ma,ster III= proposes 650 uIllits in Planning A-.reaIIand III distributed, within a grass area, of approximately, 250 acres. Tliese buildiugs we arranged in eonfig=tions which xnay include detachcd urals, townhome styled uits a slacked flats of two, four, and six units each,. Additionally, a4.5 acre nci&burhood, coninici-cial area is baing planned in the Southeast corner oft e intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58. The balance of the property is planned to be golf and open space use for the benefit of residents and their guests. Pimning Area I ischaracterizedby t'he elub facilities, supporting parking droulation olcanents, and associated open, spore area. This facility includes, MSjdej'jtr anCl, guest serving recreation facilities and supporting iises; ffir all residerits and, guests. P1 anning area It is d efined, by 'villa Residential dwelling units al" rue and two stories with associated pools and open space area. Thesc units are envisioned, as attwhed and, dataacd town-bonie "Casitas". Naming Area III is defined by various, residential dwelling product types of otie, and two stories wnasswiated pools and spas and associated open space Mr=c ' 1jeSe UnJIS are envisioned as attached and, detachcd single family units, Planning Area IV is defined by the golf and open, space maintenan'Ce facilities., PI annine, Area V is defined b-ythe Neighborhmad Commercial site and its supporting parking and, Ciraulationelements. This site is envisioned to be developed as apedestrian-scale neighbor hood. serving a, conamercial area. Planning Area V1 is defined by the golf course area and associated open space, also serving as the primary stormwater management and retention zone of the plan area. IE Specific Plwi 03-067 AM 2.4.1 L,and Use B.), Planning Arvin A, detailed discu,ssion of be pmpand lmd uso%r Q Spot& Pbn 01=7 aml be rmuhhg chalge in devekTment inwity is 1;m-esented ffir cach of tic A planriing zones, The Existh,,Ig Land'(,Isc We Wimtes a WbuWdon ofemkifing tand usic, exisfing, acivage and densities within each platining area, A range of land use categodcscur c, prr°vvid,,cd %vitlfln the Nmndwy of Me Sped& PH 03167. "I'llese include land use Or die Gal fand ope."C space vVilhin tile Plan, varkws res6dendal, uses, a, HOW neighbodmod smNAg cornmercial ose and supMmling, aricillary f-acililies For prop,,med Imid uses. T'he plan area is hoken into six distinct planl,)Ngarcm. 1%dopmou and ZoWng cHtedq respondir,ig, to the environment within cach planning area is prcscnted fbj,, each a,ise arm The dMparn to defiat cales theflnifts of each P1411rdne, Area and their rekitiortshp to the, arriended Coral Wuraain Plw,,t buLaidw-y. J , Golf Cla�j �& R"natLon AnKrAom �OM MVJfifArft&)P k&S44'rVPCAJ IN# $NMI Wky.1 mv, sm, G'Al &, Ofv, rk Sfpwe Malowma"'r I= POCIa0KNI1,111,1d CONUITkOrIdAl mm, O",,u Coum 2,9 Spedlc Phn 03467 I mm Plailning Area, I Gulf and Terink Clubhouse Land Use Planiaing At I is the intendedsite I(ar the Slimific Plan 03-067 Club fkilifies and is kvalcd in the cen'tral pollion Ofthe eaoerly half oftheninster pkai, area., Primary access to (lie Chib Nuflilias is fprovided (from the T'nairi pr("ajecl ntry point from Nfafigm Street through a, secult entry gate, Planning area I is appioxinvately, 10 acres ma d is defiriented herein. I odest'rian ai'd cart access diroughout flie plan ispirovidedion surface streets, wid ot"her apert .;pace, paths to facifitatc ahcrnative anodes of transportalion to and firDra residential areills and 01jer local offshe areas such as the Cmulnurcild vlamen't Of the plarl the in'Imection of Madison and Avanue 58. C I, ub Facilities xvill anclude golfand tenj,& I oderrooms, irmeting rooms, in, doorand outidour, rcsWuranls, lounge areas,, kitchen and food prepwation andsupport facilities, as well as five to ten tannis courts, swimming po*I, sauna, and spa amenifies, 2,101 Speci,ftc Man 03-067 M. PLANNING AREA I TABIX +PM��py�Ilygq�I 'WN'tl.�N AA1,1I,�ik TABLE 2 PLANNING AREA M-PROPOSEDLAND USE Proposed an Use Desmi pt;ion _ :flub Amenities OSR C 10 Specificl03-,067 .•E Ph,umitigArva 11 Rsddonhd Land Me Plwudng AM 11 k aekiacent MW dub hwilifies site with iritemalaccess to residential rilcifides f"vom the dub access Residential uses configured as attaclied and &W.clivi srjgle, duplex, to iplex and fm�irplex Units are: phmlllodforthe land ma willAn Plajmdng Area 11, EMI com tuid MAN= is desmibed in ttle accon"),j"xinyi fig Wlif[,fln p'l"I'll.11ing Area H lbelt are 7 1 Units p'l-oposed F6 UUMS of gerwrally flut terl".U"in. T,his ruix of mAtmAd Wdhgs and andHaDucavailm mnvnWcs rMLAtS in Muct density of hve dwdHh,g .112�.As acre. 23,2 i"We Pin 03067 691 'LAB �' SUBTOTALS 16 v,. A Ell 4 _ Residential lJse LDR RL 90 Specific, Plan 03-067 692 14a.uning Area IR Residential Land Use, I.wid tine in, Pituming, Area M' is distnbuted ganerally widun the cnL�v far cjact sits wid'°t hoenmi access to residerttial unku provided from, a mahi project loop road, f3odi, a,uachcd anddetached siagllefarrffly units are, planned for the land areswithin , Planning kcullf) Unit coumt and distributori is deson.bM in, &ccorqpauying tables and guupttics. mm Specific Plon 03-067 693 ,ANNMG.,t,kRF,A M TAR I., li�, 5 . ......... . .... .. -- . . ........ . ... . . ... . ..... ...... .... ........ .. PLAWNGAREA III - EXISTM, [ANDLISF. Exisfing Land Use Description -Vacmit FlatTerrain LDR PL 250 . .......... ISUBTOT A1,S 250 TABLE 6 ......... . PLANNING� AREA III - PROPOSED LAND USF. Itoposed Land'Usa, Description- Residential thic LDR, RL, 250 650 2.6 ............ 5LIBTOTA12S 250 650 2.6 Specific Mai 03-067 Z 15 M-1 11 M1111= CAUL and Open, S'p,am'Maintenance Aeffitleff Land -use, in, Planniog Axem TV is loputod an 3 arms a4j acent, tothe intersecUtin of 'Madholl Street, and Avenue 60 on, the northonst comes oftk inter seabom. Acoess lo dle site is provided frorm, Avc-nue 60, as woU wfroxg &a internallplan. P ASito Dmelopment Pennit shall bo opphod, for lopmcut of ft' Golf N%intenwnce Facty. m Specific; Plan 03-067 695 PLANNIN'G AREA TV PLAWNG ATMA I'V - EXP31ING IAND USE, ExLsfing Land Use Description - %Fkant Flab 'renvin W)R RI, 3 VACANT ........ . . ... ... ... ........ SUNIT)TAIS 3 PJANNING AXFA IV - PROPOSED LA,ND USE Proposed I,and the Description - Golf Maiiiieitance Facilities -viiu34MA DI, .......... CONGO' Specifte Plaii 03-067 BE W. Planning Area, V Neighborhood Commercial I,aud Uw, Planning Area V is located at the Southeast corner oft e intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58 and is planned to be accessed from either arterial roadway adjacent to the site. Pedestrian and cart access from the internal area is also planned to facilitate alternative modes of transportation to and from the site. Planning Area 'T has a total of 4.5 acres of7Teighborhood Commercial development with access from Madison Street and/or the south side of Avenue 58. Planning Area V encompasses 4.5 acres and is described in accompanying tables and graphics. ME S"peciflic Plan, 03-067 697 PLANNING AREA V TABLE 9 . ..... . ....... . . ............................. —.- . ..... PLANNING AREA V - EXL'RTfNG I A ND USE Existing I -and Use Dextiption-, Vacant Flatl&Tain GC, CN 4.5 VAC AMF SURTOIALS 4.5 PLANNING AREA V - PROK)SED LAND US Eltolx)sc,,d LwuJ Use Description - Neighborlwood Serving Cournercial M ­5 M-00171F Specific Plan 03-067 219 W. PhtnaingAreg. VI Residentim 1, (Amplporflug)i Land Use - GoffC',Ou rge / (.'%pen Space Plan ningArmVI, is distntiuted generAly and rej),reseftstlic majotity,of the pro , jeot sitz acreage, The 18 -hale, ch am,rionship golf co ur, se vv ill o" py a prox ir,,nat ely 295 Wes, wid"Ch is apigomimately 50 % of the Specific Plan area, In addition to AS function, as a ref,reational faemit y, flie gelf course componeilt will also pmvidie a significant visualr anaruiq, within ffie Speaffic Plan am w0b. thevast m4jori;y of midealtiall unilts having ftDITtageon andlnr views otip egamic wase, . The-conmptval kIYQW'fain file gOlfCOWSe is SbOWn 04 the MOMM'PlaUr bit. 's Distrib,Aon of this Imnd, use is described in accompaftying tables and grnpbLic,%, An, Employao J'YaTkinb' lot j S SAW iaj the WMer, of the pvject adjacen,t to, Av enue 5 8 al to wing ernploy- ce; woesss to, d3c site via, inknW sir udabion paths,, 120, Specific Plan 03-067 AM PLANNING AREA VI oug"m .. . ....... PIANNMGARFA I'V - KXI9rING IAND ME 17,xiating I.And'Use Description -Navant Flat Terrain OSR GC 295 VACANT" . . . . ............ . ..... .­__'­,"­.­" . ...... . ....... . . 295 ............... MAN i "CABLE 12 L,ANNTNG AREA IV'- PROPOSED LAND ()SE Proposed Land Use Descrioon OSR oc 295 0 ............. . . ..... SUBTOTALS 295 0 Specific Plan 03-067 MI um SUMMARY TOTALS TABLE 33 C313NERAL. PLAN/LAND USE ZONI"' ACRES LINITS GROSS DENSITY LI)R RL 550 650 1.2 ll'UWAC SIMTOTA'" -TABLE 14 PROPOSED LAND USE UENERAL PLANAAND LISE ZON'E ACRES INITS NET DENSITY LDR. RI, 250 650 2.6 IIIIWAC G GC 295 SITiTWE LS 550 650 2.6 D.U.IsIAC 2.22 Specific Plan 03-067 701 2.5 CIRCULATIONPLAN 'nw pi.�o;x)scd eircukai.on syslam. for the Specific Man 03-067 addressz4 the requireme'llts of the City of La, QuinlZGermil Mari Circulnunn Flernezt by provOing a hivilarthy of vehl cubr traflkr= mkys With, Pedestrian paths within, dic, (than area. 7 ' ['he Circtfla(ion Plan foflteSpecific Plan 00 3-67 uticfi llues existing vuusher ent roadway; odjacenl to awd iiitcnml to flic project area (Madison Stteet) to pfovide prittiaty "'imes's, to Oic 8pt6ric 'Pimi area, These, roadways Avenue 60, Aveaut 58, Avenue 62, Manwe Strect and, Madison Stmet rhe intemal pit-culAtion systeni, offlic amended, plan, liar Cloral Mwontain will coft.qist njf Ii wics of toop roads pravi&ng access (o Ow individual residenfin.] WWI TecreaborW comimenis withitt the Specific Plan area Cul-de-sac will afflinthe internal lorapspincs in rrlssurf'Tlg a "'pnivate noighbortlood feel", 116 'i $ wiflcous,ist of,privatc, st-reevq. "nile propos"I, 041'emladon PIMI rar flier Specific Nan 03-06is illustra-ted hay low and will conist of improvement, Of" road:ways a1wrounding the Specific Plan area, filchiding Avenue 58 to the norta, Avenue 60 to the south and Monroe tothe east. The Specific Plan area's Western boundary is Madison Street, which, pursuant to the standards set forth in Specific Plan 218 approved in Riverside County, has been improved as a 110' right of way. Similarly, Avenue 60 has been constructed as a street, including full median construction, as a 100' right of way. Except for the tie-in to Madison Street, it is anticipated that both Monroe Street and Avenue 58 will be constructed in accordance with the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element Standards in conjunction with the development of an internal loop road system to serve development within the project. Plan fee, fl"Ie syxxific Plan 03-067 is fflustrated'helow and will c4),n6.q,(Of improvenleni uFffic nx-A'voys surrounding the Speci:fir PImm, ana to, Gieneial 111an OrculationElunient Stanthuds a-nddeve1opnent afar lintemal loop road system to serve developmeni within the pmrjecc om ww Neighborhood Drives I= Car art "I'ttalwl Primary Entry Secondary Entry Servict. rurry SIx-cific Plan 03-067 702 rndividual cluster accen dtitsar are proposedwi0igenera us, scibacks hom the wivalbmeals vard and inttficr loop road to, provide safe, ingress &ud egrems, fl,orri, indivi dual rmsidences, Witlait rhoSpecific Plan, area, die circulation sysu,-rya has been daigred to atcmmiphsli th° c- fcs)., lowins:, It Provide fio hilcrimal privalercOdways tIM mixmid tril the proposed de-velopnirms, corrklms while pravidinL; it We rom, for project ingress and, egrem, ME Provide fur a pni.vate stoat with access to Ma&cm Strear nd to, facilitate than hAernal network cyf j*anned fuivatel a.iways to adtxj.mkly serve rc:,,qidcmfial meas and affier anwmu,fies,. Specific Man 03-0167 703 2.54 Offifte 101prove'"Ient"S '17110 Wgitz, InIblic strecLs suiTaundingthe project we curven, tly developed, in accordance With La, Quinta Ck Eughlecring and Public Works Da ststalai ds and will be constructed, incrementally in acc*rdanoe with the aslim ble General Plan, desipatiom, City-wide mam transit systems andstops are aceessible along ponmeter public thorougb fares. Penmtiter landscape, improvements shall lac h-nplemented along, tht proj*ct frontage, The, offifte trails systema is consislent witia tlie La Quhiba General Plan muldpurpose and Bridal Trails pbn to allow safe wcest to, tiro trwil head and staging area cuffently opuational at westedytenninus ofAvenue 58, at Lake Cahufila, 2.5.2 Oosite Improwiments The following mitigation measares arc recomm, ended to reducc potenfial circulation impacts assamated, wftb the proposed project and shuH be, implenionted in a phased m, umer in oonjunction with adjacent planning angs)� regirl rieg roadway improvernents. Bus stops will be provided, on Avenue 58 in, the vicinity of th,e project sorvice anoy and along, Avenue 610 it the vicinity of the Maintenance Building emto entry., A,I,Ihater oal,diided,j,-oadl,5,wj'll1 a,minim,umpare c=ntw,,idffiof2Ofee:t(,'dj,,vided roads) per We to accommodate minimum, desip, critaria f6r fire eqpipmont access. All other roa& shall leave a, air errant of 28 feet (intemal strecLs and drives), Each skibdivisiou shall comply with the, gar -sito and off -site stroet improvement reconmiendations and, mifigation measuresag required by the CJEnginver. All soctions shall be approved by the City of J'A Qtdnta Tran sort tin n'Depamnent J All access paints sill conform to appropriate strect classifioation per City aria 9 roe access spacing, ComwrcWuses slWI be par the Oetoral PW4 Neighborhood coav=roial ustsmost W, Jocated along secondary or greattr bighways, ornear interstefians withsecondary highways, The off'site trails systeni is consistent with the La Quanta (kneral Plan multipurpose and Bndal Trails plan, to allow safe access to the tail head and staging area, oantudy aperatiotal at ft, wostorly teminus of'Aveauc 59 At, Lake Cahnill& Specific Plan ,03-067 ME 704 Any Ifin,dscaping within public road, rights -of -way wfil mquire approval by the Commiadly DavOopm,tit , Deb tat anti usummeof conlialling mFdWcna=* tbrough tho, eta blishment ofuapo =ftilcuance distriot ar ,sly for rnedan6m, as approved by, The City. No twuredpavenw& a=nfs voilibe sillowed, within Uty right-of-ways.. Image Corridor Standards rifuc Plait Area Development gdJaccrit to tic City of'La, Quiets, Gentral Planned, bnage C<Yrddors located on Monroe StTew,Avenue 60IMadison Stroclojui Avenue 58 shall bc restrictedto, a height lb-nitionc f 22' Ii-oin pad grade -within a setbatkl distanct cfI 5 0' fiom the fUgJit-ofW�1y. Roax and side yard -setbacks for' lots adjactat to ithe In-mgc C,orridan shall be expanded to a mininimn of,25' pc.T La Quinu Municipial,Zoning, Cocie Sectimi, 9,510,020. m Specific Plan, 03-067 705 2.6 MASUR PLAN SUPPORTIN'G ELEMENTS Open Spaoe� Remation, And Inkastructure, Philuand Concepts Widtin theSpecific Flan 03-067, the 0, pen Spue, ' ReCTcatiou and. Inftastructure Plan ideetifies andestablialles die plan policy relative to the managment of'open space, vial recreation, arnaii- tics widiin, ffie plan ivea bound my as w0J as delineates infrastrucWto supporting the planarcu, The purpose of 'this, plar, is to estobfish development policies and aphilosophy wbich identifies ;(sources and facility sites in the plan area, whichshati be managed, to prev ejit waa, e, destruction, at and of nataral o r tuan inade amenifi es or resources, PROJECT SETIIRqG The 550 au= prqJW ar= is withm the City of La Quintz, as 51 square mile mimicipatit y Iocattd, in, the so"Othwestem roftion of the Cowhells Vbfley. Tho Uty, whiff was inoogwated i,n 1,982, is4aWdedtan the west bythe City as tali Wells, an the east by th. e Ci, of Li6oaudRivmside cowity, on the nDrth, by ffiveiside County; and Fakwal and Couniy, land3 totbe south. The fifth amendment to the Specific Plan project site is generally defined by Avenue 58 along the Northerly boundary, Monroe Street to the East, Avenue 60 to the South, and Madison Street to the West. 2.6.1 Open. Space amd Recreadon The: Specific Plan 03461Master phw wtilizez open space and rmvadon as a firkdamental ooncelm, for the development. Rxlensivc rocrcational amonities haw hoen incorponded, into the design of the ptojeot to sme future: wMeWs.'The pr4umv reereatiowl compown't of tho dovoloplow wiU, be an I&hale ahampioaship olr cours: In additionto its function, as a =—mational fk-ili- ty,ft,gulfcoursecm, nent, will alsoproAdo,avisual ameraty witbin the Sp=&Plan area with, p() as significant 11wid)er, of midCutw =4s having ftoatc oat and/or viewT, of tree golf course IndividuaL &Ydopments, within tho Spcoffipftin aroa way'havo additional =rcafional arneuities kioluding temfis and, swimming facilWes Io augment the aboa base, of lbe community. The cor=ptuallRyout title golf course and private atub facilities, are illusfiVed on the master p1w, graphic. Specific Plan 01,067 2.27 706 2.61.2 Infrastructure and 1,11flifies Plan The inn as(niztuna e, systemplann6d to serve the Specific Plan 03-067 pTqjcct described below wifi, be daygned to provide a coordin-aled system of infrastractuve and publiz sorvioes toa&qatcly serve ibe plim ea, all full buildout.Starads fdr infrastructure and pubhc servicas tckdve to land rise intmiLsity envisioned for the plats area will he s,cTvcd by the foUvAng uhlitics;, Sewer - Coacbella Valley 'Water'Digtriot (CVWD') Water - Coachella Wley'Vhtcr Distnot p) Flzctrlcity - Imperial IrrigalionDistTict (11,D) Gans - Southeni Califonlia, Cras COM�Psny 2,63 Wateid, Sewer PlOn The intent of the Spooifix Plan 03-067 is to udli= exis6ng water and v�wzr facilities -where, pos- sible, and to piovide additional, or upgraded'hicilities as necessaq. WaWbr and sewer savice for the Sr c plant , uas provided by the CoacbWI&'VslIc�y Water District (CVWD). The GVWD pmvidee domcgicwaw, from wails, Agricaltuml, wateruzed for irrigation is, a surface wator s-ow-m- An underground imiga:Uoa disluibuti,on system providing water to the vaUey,, traverses the Westem Poi doll, of the Specific Plan 03-067 propel y from the northwest to the southwest. The Specific Plan, 03-067 will conform to dw rcq*rementi of the CVWD's, curront and future pro- grams, and requirernents Pertaining to water mama stment, and catiservatkut sewer Service The Srx-,oific Phu), area, would 'be serve by a, wnc;s (YF stamdard sewer lines and Iftrals pint , exisfing I 8"force mains located in Aveoitie, 60 =W Madison Streot, Ptmiping fazilities would be locatma asuccessEUY Within the specific Plan area, to transport sewage toflvn- existing trunk Knes, Tho CVWD has indicted its ability to provide sewer sel Vioe to, the Spexific,plan area. Domestic Watm- Service Domestic water would be, distributed to iadlividW midential its by stan4ard waterlines, to be located,mithfii, road rigW-of4ay.'New water lines woulJ need to boinsWkd in,pu4junotiart. with road, inaprovements tags e the proposed Specific Plan 03-0,67 development. The devrJop,,cr wall be required to construct domestic water lines, transmission mains and reservoir sites to accommodate the water demands for this project. CVWD requires a well site for each 70 acres of developed land. The final number and location of such well sites will be subject to CVWD approval. ME Specific Plan, 03-067 707 Irrigation Witer The sources fier irrigation water for 'die golf" course and other Imidsca1v fiat ; within the Speaffic P1,8111 area Will bB provided,by reclaimed or mal water, Tht-*qe, watm will be stored. in lakes uid, ponds locuted throughout W gulf course . The exisfing undergrowd inigadron dtgth,- bution syste.in Iraversing the Speciflic Plan. area is not witicipated, to be &1"murbed in, vmijtmotim with, Specific Plan implementation. The! golf course have been routed over'ibis irrigation line to ensure Ilia no residential'unils would Lie emstruct'ed on, top, of the, md=Wund line. GTading, Of the golf course will be coordillated ith, CVNM in TCIAfi011 to, flic alignment of the exisling or relocated, hnes. CVWD,resorves, the ii,ght to review and, approve, any mztMrty occurring, Ntlun any emsdng irrigation jrigbt-,Qf�'way withir the Specific Plan area® 2.6.4 Electricity All, overhead p6fic utility traASIDiSSiOn HOC$ FQT cable 40d telephone ue rmAed or cmi-rcully, soheduled fat ire sw"lation ill the, Vicinily, of 010 PeT`meter Of the Sp ifs. Plan site, The developer will b,o roquire-d by, I'M, to bistall to District swidards, All permignent power and telecon—=MikafiOns disLdbution lineq internal to the prqjecf� will be required to, iustall, thuse favilifires underground perthe Maria goidelira es where passible, 2.6.5 Natural Gas All natural, gas tmnsaiission facilities are rotifed or cinTemly scheduled for imstallation in, the vichl4w ofthe peritneler f the Spccifilc Plan sitz, The, developer Nvill be required, by Southern calicbmia cr&q t�Ompaqy (t,he (jas C ompaninstal to 1he Gas Comipany stmidard& All per-, mment distribution haes intemal to, the prqj act will be i nstalled per the District &debnes, 2.6.6 Telephone Land -bused telephoue services ut, pi-ovidtd by Gentrat Ielephone Con pauy W the project area 1-6-7 Refuse Collection, Refuse collectim witbin t1m City limits iprovided by rm enlinty franciiised bhe City of" La Quint'aandomars inazoor6mcc with asoh ednle esUiWsbedfry the frambis", and the City,, Itis envisionod drat unit areas of thelp1mi will be served by extension of the, contract refuse co flacdon servives, cmien.4, y is place with the City, prior to regululy schedtded pick-up and removul,, rt>fusc ll be contained in a inaintafizd, surface, bin environmcnt to ensure recycling, of waste materials as appropriate andreqpited, Specific Plao 03-067 2.29 Um School. Service School service in Ow vioinity of the Specific Plan =a, is provided by 'the, Coacbella VkHey Unifled Maool District (CVUSD)i, It isnot witicipued that vigWficant numbcrs ofstuderats , wj'fl be, Spierat rd by the Specific Plan due toflie anficipaled faniffy chaxacteiistics of potenfidl pin. climers of residentialunits,. The applicant, will, contn'buto school fees in accordance with the requirtuneats oftheVUSID. Etiforcement In general, police pyoteofion far -lira Specific AM, am will be provided by the Counly of Riverside SheriAs Departincnt. Police protection pro vided'dry ffie SheriM Depastinent will, be augrnenW by security, facilities to be, jacerpoyatedinto the Specifir, Plan.1a gerieral, it is unfici- ,piated il'tat flie: entire Specific Plan area will bea Sate guarded coamiunity with its, ownpnvate security faice. Plyimmy and, secondary enkances to thenresidenbal, developroodrams will be protected, by efthor rd-gated ontry orby card -gated mtry� 11epre sence of suchseourity will, roduoe, the depondorim of the development on complete protp(llon by, Cho RI'venide County Sheriffs Department and �Arx Cir of La Q)ainta, stcuAty persotinel. In addition, it is anticipatod, that iiiany of" tharesidences vAtWu the Specific Plan tern Will haVO their own individual pri'vsite seca rdy systems. 'Mis pattern fix-, beentypical of other similar devoloptimats by, Llw developer, 2.610 Fire Prokttion Fire protealoa wittda dw, ipocifio plait area vAll be pmvidlod by the Riverside Cowes Fix:e DqWtalent., in conj'vix)(ion wig 'theit FIGA West develp,P mftt, the developer, coastmoted a jim, fire station (,)n the PGA West, property atMadukon Street and Avenue 54 (Oa : "POA Station"). it is antioipMcd that fire proteofion serviez tag the specific plan area will bopmwaded firom th.e PGA Start iorL 542 acres ofthe 987 acre pbn aroawas, ofiginaXy entitled, fbr 2,198 devek)pable, twits. Siice originally approved, dcvelopmnent of-bolit ft PGA West devOopinerat and" that Coral Moautain specific: plan, areas have expariencod a sigidicantreduction In overall projW, densftia& As as result, 'the, P GA Station shoutd be, moxe thzin suffioieritto service the requi rements of this plan, am. Z-6-11 Library Facilities - The City is, served by a public, library which is, administeredbY the. Riverside Comity Ubtary Syftm, located within 6 miles of the pivjecl boundary., 230 Specific'Man, 03-067 709 This section provides design guidelines and standards that apply to the Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment V. The general guidelines presented herein are an extension of the approved "Original Specific Plan" Design Guidelines and in many cases paraphrase the prior approval document where applicable. Niany of the guideline.9 and standards, though applicable; tbtotighout the project, only apply in cn r. tain city tic's ar in, cat njunctiort with cortain uses am4forbuiWing types, Those guidolilies that have no specific caU-ovt or pogxopWc, refer" mce point can 'be assumed to apply umfbrmly ffi-oughout the project sitc� Itshould, be, noted gloat dwse cksign Our clinics standards dol n,,,Qt replace at teduce apphcable subdivision requirements-, of the City of La Ouitta, andJor as, modi- fied by, dw adopted Original Specific Plan. '11ke following inaJor to ' rimas me, into rate in this, secAm 'Mmrmu,�t e Overall Coy PIC 'flivnes, C ormnercial and AnciLlary Baildings and Sites, Club Facilities, ResidentialBuildings, and' CTrading GuWelines =d Standards. Specific Plan ,ommunity The%nre "I'he Specific P No 03-067'Master Plan will rely on, the Raimbo, La Quinta projwt as, a baseline fbT architwural and landscape architectural standwds, These desi,p,gain eBraes will assistthe, devel- opor ofthe Spetific Plan, 03-067 prqjoct to, execute a, bufft eavitanment that hw&Momw flie fol- lowing rarda concepts� Develop a conun°ty that is visuUy attracfiad, captums the essence of the s wxDint dihgsd filoorporate a vaxiety of open space and recreational uses (active and passive). Desip a PupOd COMIbUnity that Wroplznients, exisihng development in, tho gurrounding =a and is cosupadble with the swuunding eavironama. * Establish densAtics that are consistent with development patlerns of'surrounding areas., * Remoze the, unique nature. of'Czral Mountain as a ==unity within acommunity lai meets the living andracreational neods off residents, of the UV of La Quintk Develop a high quality golf course to create a strong community identity and long- term value. The daign gaidolira es containcd in this, s'absootioll are, ffiten&dl to establish a consistent design approach amang site plann*, enginecri ® uchitecturo, Ewd, lanftoape arebitectutal componeau- W41leallowing flexMity, in dMign over the, Wild-twt ofthe corninunity., Spooifio Plan, 03-067 23 1 710 The design. guidefives 1W SNcifik Plwi 03-067 are, intanded, to, Assist in impjewentixg Ote desiga, mwnt of the Spetific Plan Ijy establishingprqjet design compatibility, aniong different residendal density and land uses; Provide a Consislent ApPrOACII, to site planning ad; the design of buildings, Ar"As, signage, ivalls and fances, Ughting, Ian dsc*ng, and alhor design clemerents that will endure for ft, r H& Ofibe CO'numiniv., I'he pidefines provided herain suggest themes compatiblewith Spanish Colonial '�cluraoter" but are not intended to linult expressiow of varying architectural, styles. The design guidalin"� pre- sented, hexeirt establish the fr=ework- to achieve hannony and, compatihility between residential neighborboods, while sdII pwvWing" flexibflit, 'dw allow's for a'variety ofaorbit emrend expression mid inn erpret i. Examoles, oft rr desiguffiatne are illustrated Iffiroughou'll- this docanaeut, Time exarnples am''Moant to Convey gowral dogi gn con is and are not intend d to Jimit th, e rangge of expression among indivWual builders mid their pnxkssional design tearns. The guidelines are provided for 'thc Nmefit ofmcrebrat Intilders, Their plannen, / designers, and, City Df La Quinta shiffarid decvi.Mon-nukng bodies, in dm mview ofI"Utlure Spocific Plait 03-0,67 site developmentproposals. As suok, the des4n, giiidebnes identiry clements for an residuntial, ,wd othar land use proposals 'widiii,i the Spacfirrk, Plivi 03-067'area, Tien giiWclines may be incarpora,W into subseqoant situ dmelopment pennits, conditionaL we peremits, and subdivision, roaps sub mitted,U), tho City for, approvil unless A, is demonstrated that certain guidelines, are not appliDable, qp,p'opriate,, or kmible under, site-sped'fic circullislances. Z32 Specffirc Plan 03-0167 711 A rany gbout dw d p f , ge of awted of tones shall be used ffiTou evelopwnt V411in S Col 10 Plan 03-067. Materiah in Commercial Arch itecture Roof materials shall inclade day barrdl, tile, as concrete d1e, and concrute shakes. The Coit of roafq shall provide a rpge of deep earth tonc& The color of roof mat enals audl be varied to Taft ffic Wsting, surrounding ar6hitectwul dieme, AUrooft material allt befire retardant MI The lyred omirant extenor building M'Stenal shal be swooth fibish stuoco in k'Cepil"18 with the Specific Plan 03-067 archittawal mmudar. IVP Wood, file and, wrought hon, shall be appropuattly ittoo",vated as acoont matcdaLs sad be consistant Mth the arVhfteutuml stylm SpoeffiePlan 03-067 712 Ommercial Are,a She Plannill"19 Appropriate site, plaiming guide W-ws us discumed below shall b� o usul to mum fimcdonal stud aesthetic development witWo Sixcific Plan 0-3-067's Neighborlioud Commercial ccntej� 11-e guidefines are intended to be flexible and not relf guidelims, am applicable in all situation& Reasunable applicration ofguidelist es irL order to achieve a high quali:ty cousisteavy, in desigm, theme within the a4jacerut archlitectuTat cantext will he necessary, conformlo the, miteriasetfourfli, Flexibility In interpretation is to be implarviented it site dmsigu to achieve, individual expression, Building AWsing and Scale in CommenialArchitecture The character Df the carm meTeW development areas shal.] reflect �a neighborhood scale; so that building, mssing does notoverwhalm thcstreet scene, 'l.hesitc,sftalibe,,w,,hcirircrpossiblic,tow. rise ip natam to create a plemant pedestrian scale environment, Specific Plan 013-0,67 235 713 Building wad I plants, parficWaTly on the fiont dJuvabon, shallbe offool-to Cr at,interest along thc strom, to provide a desirable poastrianscale and, avoid vismal monomy Single-story jAitc lines we encowAged on tim front clovato,& Scoand-story wWj, p1lancs, ,4bil1beoffset to effectively"break up thebuitcling mass mid reduce dit peicDiv edbwild ing scale ai viewed. from Ow straw. - Single -stow pW Imics, with scDou&Mty wWI setbacks are cnoowagod on side and rear elevafionsl * Side ellevabons slWl provide the sokie level of uficWabon and doted u the, front elavalhow 0, Aniculated,,ro�ocapessbaUWcreateddiroughtihCUSC,Df'a,'VB,f�iotyo;froOtforMs. M Repethious gable m, ds along ant and rem clevations sball be miWmized, Specific Plan D-1-067 714 2.7.3 '.117he S,pecific Plait. 03-067 Golf and Counti-y (Aub Facififies ,A Cltibhowse cvt�plex at the Lvmter of the Specific Plu 013-067,11isstcr, Plan will fimmion as -the social oenter nd kcal pedixt oftbe cammunhy, Thit complex is compnised of: A olubhouse jrmiding dining, [aimgo and social acfivir faeflifici club, and spait Acilit Ip lily Shops, lockerroom's, tow)ges and, golf sionge for its, cbmnpionsbi gulf course and sopporting circtilation facilifies for oporafims, of ttose 5cili1ei. 1 Circulation thoilifies fair golf, and clubhouse operadons 4, " C" tq -LIng a ,A SvAm amd'remms , feaftuing 0, pro shop" locker roams �md a restauran, o' C am is envisioned for Specific Vim 03-067.. The Swim end Tennis,Club, is sile4, withL a gmden settizig overfookitig the couds, pools, and spm ASpa steam roani,a aalon, and Mail is envW000d four Simific Plan 0-0,67, Ctuh, Fneklity $fte Planning Guidellovs The sile design, and p1manin; of tho Specifir, Plan, 03-,067 clAmb Wilily' area such as the Golf and Tennis Club 'will inmrporate, le it that respond, to tba, desert elimatein the, sa= matUlef US the residentml componcuts of dic; plam, Elemants inchido, gaaarous pafiog, spacioimi courtyards, ateades, pA andtheir, planning guidelines for camuncruial, golf are ODuntry Club 5wilities are Usted below. Specific Plan 011,67 m 715 ME Main buitdings shall be, whereve.T pimsible, gifed in Vandmark locations and be emily uc'(xSSjbje al"Id corl"W"nient Service areas shall be, wvhercver possible, sited in lmv-.Visibdir areas and eff5ectivoly sarmned by a0lizirip, buffAing elenictos, aad car landscaping. PedesIrian access routes betmea adjacent eases, shall be, wfiereveT jxx"iblt, ihcorTx)raied inato thu,sited 1migm Pede,;Iriari spaceshall far, wherever pmsa,Ifl.e, provdvdI by creating, p1azm, cointyar&, andpmmemead es, tbat hak use areas, Pitrking vsball tic, wherever possibte, uriented taw pormit poctestj ian flow Io club facilftics, Radestrian coud's arr, encmiraged., espe,mally to accent open W-W�, 84,CtSS, Oil' S OF j p Wt Irullall'r vefd,cuW martog mid drop-offs., "The mm of landscalic arcas, and green space to vieparaft, vustarnar tral5c, ff(mit conunucial andd smice ouffic is enzourq.,ed. Shared i.isz of scriicc, aj.egas , parkmg, accogs, etc, , shall be rMegralrd into Olt!, de,,6gn wherm,ar po,qsible. 438, Sptcafic Mari 03-067' 716 0 Roof (xIuiIxncnt shallbe archimcturally scremied Where fl asible, . Pedostrian acwss to adjacent uscs sIWI be, prov,i&d where feasible. Club Facility Design Ctiteris, WOU Fleas NMndowso and Doors 11w use of'wood ftwx N6nck)ws scaled to die intodor space is encouraga Frames sImB be, wherever possible, pointed ca, approptiaWy colored to mwtch lay' facility. Thai use of wwd trim is encouraged on all elevadons visible ftm a, private or quasi -public spaces. Thm sballbe coin*blbuilding's arclilt ectum aad color, The stylb of mndows slull be compadbte v4di the arch tectuml style of the building, The use ofnu diftent whiow styles and or shapesort one Widing p1me shall be avoided, The size said, proporOon of pwits shal I bo in scale to Ow overal I wall plane, Acaeat windows ftt have a diftrent or u*ulatod shW or Wfize multi -paws "I be used to create interest o�n building elevations as to as tarp Ue consistmt with tho agile of the builchng. t I ?, , / 11 OW7 Y"MAY, " , , V"Vwr"7 Entries The club entry shall be a focal point of tht building"s front elevatior through tho appmpriate use of as itig, building offset , VWied roor elenlents, columns, porticos, recesses or projections, went %ind,m or other archit"rat featmos. Specific Plan 03-067 HE 717 rombes, Salton]", and RMIJImp, " Porches, shaff be incorporakd to tlie greatest extent possible, Porches an,d baloonies fimution as an exknsfon. qmces to provide visual interest, shadow, texture and shade:. Second stir" balconies arc cawmaged to providisvial, atteras'L Pomhes and balcOWCS AWL be d6igned a'q an integral Component Of tho building's arthitecture, and style, and shall not appear m apoorly conctivod addLon alement�, sludl complement the bLfflding's mchiteo- tare and 9[yle. Cdltumns usad, as a alluctue'al, or aasthefiz &stguelomerut shall convey asolid, and durabie 1rn4gmc, and, shall be conslat erd: mdfli the arohit ectural style, of the club facil 4� buildin& ON a Spoeff''o Plan 03-067' 718 Cod m may 'be used w, fice-slanding forry; or as suppws bor roofs and balconies, Chim,neys Clinutoys. partimiJarly chimacy caps, shall be simple in desi,onot to distract from the building, The desi,p of chimaeys shall be compatible with the architecWral style of the building. Exposed metal flues ve not pennitted. IM Exterior stairways shall be simple bold element's We cotAplementflie axcWtectural massing and form of the bigilding. ,krcbways "'rite use of archways shall be compadble with the architezturgd style of the building, and, designed as a complementary compomnt of the building or a4jaceat cowtyard, Siveffilt Plan 03-067 2AI 719 A Wben used, =Itwav's droll delblie or enfiatue space, sucb as enuics, porticos, pado;, courtyaids, and paiking demcnt& Walls and Fences Walls and! fences which we visible from streets, open space, or other private or qM' gi-public areaq, shall be compatiblo in material, color, end desig,11 widl adliAccult C'Xisting architectural elements, Building Details A.H mechaniW equip=w, shall be scmened, llmm view by Walls or fewes that are compafible: with, tho'building aw.Wtcvturc, or by adequatcly, sized: pjant material, ME All uUlity meters ate to In in'tegrated into the architecture and, wremled from liew The materials, colars, and forms of gang's structures shall be consisfent with, the. arclihectura I style ofthe, cl ubfkci Ifty, oeiglib arho od in whi ch, dwyxv located. Building desigms that hicorporate U-Whses and other shad, e strauftm., are, ancouraged., Accessory stiuctures shall be dwiened to, be cotimsten.1 with the ardhitcohae of Me adjawnt club facil,ity buildings., Specific Pifin 03-0167 720 Club, Facility Site PInirig Crwfttr-ia ClUb ftieflity areas are to mairitain a pedestrian frier�dly em,6reawtm, through thc use of apps,)p:riately proponioneall architecluxal Bnd laridscape e:lenie.ivtq,. Street'I"jumisbings fftw add to, 1hefesti've mid peder,(Tjan atmosphere surrouadingthe club shall be encouraged, no Grotip fimotions and uses are encouraged at, plaza spaces and fecreatioti affl,eflifits to promote an live',Iypedestriailoiivi,u"o,n,m,ent. Areades provide a pe4,estriax) cale Ict bidIdings and pleasail shade cover, jmi�ticularly when used mth and wesn'flacadzs. Special' areas such as pasco s, pluum, and courtyards shal 1, be created W, further enhance Ow, pedest,,rian environmerd. Li ghti'ng f i xtwes shal 11 b e stiial I in scal c an,d consi tent with the character arid use o f Appropriately sipa,ced benches and senting, areas are to be provided for pedestrians comfort tv, cloth mallemi al a,nd, flown from, vertical free- SIMIding,POIDS Or incorporaled into the design of'street fighting and bui Iding architecture 1hrougli the use of ew-ifflevered pol,es, Club Facility ParkIng Plarking (oo-street and off-street) sball be designed to nvinimize the vk,ual ampw' of parMng area!%., Om Specific Plan 1013-067 721 Off-street surfaace parkiri,g shall be screened frow view dirough Ow, use of plant material or low walls (hat are cflasisrenl widi the aittartar chual Myk M Landscape treatments slvaH be used at sialhoc pukin,g areas toprr)vide shade: and rnini- mizethe visibility, of pfirk—ing, &rca,s, Parking areas shall provide clearly deflned pedestrian circiflatiati, Tra.gh enoRwares, loarting',glee ks,, rubbisb biast, Irmuformers, satellite antenrias, processing eqaipmeA, mad any ale paratuws must he screened Rum view au-'augli, the use oflandscape or architeavral elements that are coppatible with the. buildingareMitec., ture tri renal erial, colm and de,sagril Club Facility Massing and � a"Ale Offs,cd wall, planas 91mil'be usod, as art integral part, offlw building design trovidle visual wiio- ukihirer I Building offsets sha]Ibe, used to Indi'Vite, building eases iand 'pedtstnwi nodes. . Ofrsetear aiLgledbuihinge g comers shall, bused to provide subtte articolatiork, The Clubhouse buildin, g mayssing flu'll Consist of''Omix ofbwflding heights alorig Nviffi die use of facial vertical tAernents, Z.144 Pro.jectilons, averhangs and rectues sball be used to provide slWo%v. fulicolation, and soaleto building elevafiorts,, S, ecific Plan 03-067 ,P 722 ; r4' " t"I Stepping back, of hididing e I evations iq encouraged to provide second stnry terracer, and Visual Articuladorl� The club fauffity areas shall areate a distinutiveroofs eyap e ifiewne by WiIWAg a, wuloty, of roof &IM"Is. Building design shall inn ogiorat e elerncrat s that respoiziid to flat delsert clftnate, of La Quinta throughthe use ofektirtyards, paseos. arcades wid extended roofoverhangs. Matevials said CaforOte Club F,4014 A vange oftwta eatui tones shall be used ffirougbosat the c1ub.1kedity areas at 3peciric Plan 03.0,67, 00111 NO) Spooffic Plan, 03-067 MM 723 The extemsive use of bright vibrant colons is d i somraged. excej,.Yt mi, I im it weent andior fival emenu, The color of roofs, should, povida a range oftones oompatiMe with Tegional Spanish traditiong-All roofing tuatesial shall be fire, retardant, The cliamle iri La, Quima is charmeri=d by sunny and hot weather in the summmer and, relaxi vely mild winters tbat fbature excellent air clarity. Tbe desip of residences shall imow zlements which respond to thme wndftioxist swat aspa4im, cowlyark, areades, pluas, yard passageways, Tn, addition, extended roof ovethangs shall be used toprovide shade. Offier residential site Consid. eratimis inrludethe fall owhig: No The placemesit of structures Should coasider prevalent eaviroamental conditiorLsimlofflng sun orientation, prevailing vids mW1 dcsirW viemd. Orientation of residential developm. ent edges should maximize view potential d access to natural open arm and, recreation areas, Open space " are gors" should extmd into Tesi- d=liaJ areas where possible, Varying hoarse configTara dmis on wmer 10tS, is OnDDUTagOd tO PTOIXOtt Variety b) d1C ArM, scene and prmerve sightlilnes of drivers at intersections. A, wrnhination of side -entering and front entemg garages and varied driveway, localijons a,re encouraged to, breakup rpetifive curb cuts and yard pxftems. Specific Plan 03-067 724 Gumt parking shali be, wherever poss ible,located 0 provide easy =ess to, nnits., F'Our-wiry intersections within iudividLial neigliborhoods arediscouraged, Neighborhoods bordering open ueas shall be,'whemver passible, sired to rnaxinnze views, of the Specific Plan 03-0 67 cmuu anienities" While disco uTaging, thrugh access, Remeaflon areas/weenbelt features all be, wherever, possible, visible on en": 'to nciLihborhoods to enhance noighborhood value, Individual multi-flinii1y buildings 5ball be, wherever pmuible, separated sufficiently to provide a green ,slea ce, image and acemnmodatdks, and other, eirculation elements. A. , Rtsidentia,l,,Arch.rat'Desi,,ga CHteria, WAII, Planar, Windms, and Doors The use of desert Beal wiffistiuiden g, windows is encouragtd, IfaltauJimm or vinyl fkame, wiridows = issed,the; frmuz must be painted or apropLiately colored, to, oompIonierit die bAding and/ortrim matprial. Specific Plaii 03-067 ME 725 The use, of matipwic windamistucowaged for ftntelovations whichme viible -from. othrx, private, air qlasi-public, spaccs,, Ifim ingy be painted to oomplement ffic buildin g aschitecture and color., Tho MyLcaf windb%,s shall M compatible with the nrcWteciural style of'ffie building. Tlie me of many Brent styles of windam, DRODD building p1me shut] be avoided. The size and prqpm lionp=s shall oorrespond to Ite overall proportioning aftho clevadaft, Acceat windows, that have a diSerent or articulated, shape or utilize mul,ti-p=es smolt be used, as an aectrat clement to create interest on building cAevationa,, Whidows are to be consistent With the 'regional SpaAsh style. The entry of r"idendni dwrUing units shall be lctdatW as a Ibcal point, oftho'bull, ding's, front clevation through dis appropriate, Woof rout clements, Wjwans, P='Cos, recesses or prqJections, windows or other archit ecttirall fefftear cq,. Suffidou swking; disw ccs,at project entries sball bc, wlwrcm possible, provided, Porches, UnIcrut es, and, Railings MM Front porches, shall. be design,4 where fibasible, m an integral put of buldingq, to, provide visiml, interest, as wall as to proinote soeW intcxaction asumig commu,nity, re5idznts by pmviding ouldoor fiviog spams oriontcd to tho frow afthe dwolling fneorporateporches ftod balconies to - Con ction m, extensions of in or spaces, to provide shaded oul,docr l,iving spe,ces. Spevifiz Plan 03-067 726 Porches widbsilconies sball designed as anintegial component of thebuMingand not as a poorly cancoNed add -an Clomant. 'The, desip, of porch and balcony'railffigs, shall compiwnent the buildhig's architeebare and, Style. Second story baloonies are cncouraged to, provift'visuAlarest. Columns Colunim used. as a structural or aestlw, rtic design elernew sWdl couvey a, solid and durabla itnagle, andstwIl be consistent with The a,rcl-itecturat #yk of the building. Columm may used as, afree-standing fammi, w as support for ro,A and, balconies, Chilnueys Clifinneys., parfiotdarly chimney caps, shid] be simple.) n dr . ip, so as, not to disirmot froin thie bvd,lding. The design of chimney's shall be oompadtile with the architectwad style of tht buildillg. Exposed metal flues are not pamwitted.., Spocifilo Platy 03-0,67 ME 727 J6"$, PAPa*r W/Cap IR 100,4 --15M U W^0 WlgompdodMoreAr 5, J 50t.10 LOW WAU Suilding Deuils All shallbe screened, firorriview b,y vvaHs or fences compatiblevvitb- the building mar chitechire, or by plant material adeqixft Jh size to provide proper screcrfing, IU, materials, colors, and: tbrms of caxpwt stractures shall 'be, Ninsistent with tht, arclulmtural state of the neighborhoodsirt wtd6h, they are located, . A=ssory stray aures shall style oftba a j . nt, buildinS& All flashingshay i meta], and vents shaft be,, wherever possible, painted, or sorcenod from view in a momer whidh is earnpadble vAth the builWng archat ecture. Common Space Elements All residential mas shall have fully encAosed truh encloaures, which, arc compatible in materiaL color mJ fts ign vvith thebudding archilecture. Suppart t, ccilitieg such as reeant ion, buildings, pumarient leasing offices, uiail stations, ete, shall be designed in the samearchitemnut sty'le, and to IhD sunel lavel, of detafl. and artiouluMoti, as the maia buildings they- support, B. knidenfial Site, Plamming ("ifteria Single -Family Deftobed Th 0 fol lowing concept Shall be incorporated into the d,esi p of Angje-family d euched, n, h'bor- hoods; The stwi layout wklu residettialuaigbborbouds, sbaU provide view corridois to the pedestrian pathways, open space, and Imidsoape eleram mAss, thereby unifyihg, pedasWan oironiation and, site landmarks, whore *,asible. The, usa of parkway's or gitmholt gardem, comucting ft resideatial Courts is, emouragedr in the design, of neighborhood,%treetscapm Specific Plan 03-067 ME 728 Um Residential dwelling units shall be sited tview opporfirnities of the MOWItains in the La Quinta, regiob, whm- [Ommibk. Wherewm-stary, unit are located uUaccgat to one another, the id second story of ittleast one unit shalt be stepped, back, whore feasible, create, a sin gle-ster y plate line, alung, die commonside yard® Uclocaton, of dxmllkig Wts way include a wndorn x of frant entry and side ents,s, almig,with a snot mmurf.,w!nceA,,Ohere ftqJh14, to, provide variely to the street scame. Stin gle-Famfly Atathed The general site p1mifing wnicepts establislied, for tin csingle-fiarWy delached noighborhoods also, apDaly, to the sm'''lam fimity attached neighborhoods. In, addition the folio-Adag conecpt Shall bo inemporated, fiito Ote design of simgl e-fam, "IY , amobed neighborboodg: ' Neighborhood entry roadways ghall fWU il. in ty , S Oil an, armild Y or a conm 6 open flmco feat= or landmark� where fbasibla. The street layout widiin raside-nfiall neighborboods shall providr, view corridors 'to the open space and other s i,al, oimnwi4 features mW ljartdmuks� whem, f0siblm In, addition, the view corridors sbould is Imovido physical, a 'to these community features, where feasible. rc The design, 0 stroth shall, bepedescrim orianted. Thevsr, of Parkways is, enrouraged in. the desigm of'tieiiThbdstL-tscapes,, Who ferasiblt, /7, WAR,Solkame-+ Aho.mA( 1. Em Street Tawas, WON W(POIlAxters, WOR Spm& Plan 03-067 729 The following 0aidelines are pirovickdto give gen, earl direction, to gTading design. lberdrntuy focus of flime Guide5nes isto M&Jmize the visual impact of grading by shaping the land:(bnn, to reheat a more natural topography, Theemsting relativelyflat character of thespecific Plan 03-067 site,will require a caTefully thougWout grading design, to signifivantly alter The natural landforni to create drama, mW visual =citemoul. "I'liese Guidelines art intended to,outline appro,34h-as to landforal alterations w1hiehaccornPlish this draroa and, yet sensitively blend gradod are with the adjacent topognapink conditio", Since the majority of Andalusia Country Club property is generally without significant contour or grade, it is anticipated that landform alteration associated with the development will be substantial in order to achieve the development goal of the creation of unique and dramatic landform within the golf course, residential, and open space area of the plan. Gmdiug Comeepts And Stoodurds Latulf6na skeratian proposeda per; Ofoonstmotion wiftin thelpro ject site boundary -is skibiect to, roview anti approval by the ideveloper as part of 'the plain review procedures. Suchview shdl include, buf no t tv hinited. to, thefoflow4 criteria:, lams `act slopes should be varied in cross-section, andWong tiro slope length that utflize var- ied gradients, Manufactured landf:kunis at development edges shall be recontouredlo a triinanition to theirexist- hag, gmdo, The W and, cram of any manAklumAr slope in excess of tear bat ('10") in; height shall 'he rowidodwth verikd curves to, to ewzte natural, nombmpt: gra& chauges, A-11 grWed slopes shall be ravegptau-4 aud izrigaW, in aocordancewith . dw bndscape areWtecbiral and resourm amain agrarer it stan&rds outlined, in, these Guideumes, said as approved by die devOoper. Mere re,r, idardial access acro%s &ai,nage courses oecurs it shall be accornpl: ished by abridge or aostbefica3ly enhanced oulveti. Where, these; improvenienm 000tu� nMrW inatenals nmy lie used, for slope batik, prataeti= Beans, channols, swales., etr,, shall, be gruied in such away as to be an integm], pad of flao grad- ed a paved suzihoe, and shall, be designed with smooth vertical transitions betwoen changeg inslope, Grading and'DTaInage, Plan,s must be, prepared wider the direWon of a licensed Civil Briginem. Speci fie, Plain 03-07 MW 730 2.9 Plant'Material Palette The ffieme of the landscape arehitedwe at dw, Specific, Plan, 03-0,67 project' is 'to Omale a IuSh desert char ter of visual variety and texWral intereat whiff ,e complying mrith mter conservin,8 teoluliques beW on, plant. Seleetina and, techniW bmgadoll system design. ConsiNtent witthis goa,l, use arf dt"ght tolerant plant materW is a, primmy consideratim i i the &vdapmerat rah fit plant palefte to hiAer aid in fite comi-vabon rat" -wate-r-winn e prom lotin gdais Itnh desaft, theme in the, prevaiting ImAscape milage. Ib provide guidanc,e to the buildrm and dmigmis of future, projects within 1ho SpImific Plan 03- 067 ee4 the plantmatmial paleft suagested gives gnidgawe to balers and developers witb, proi in the pioject Species in addition to 1hose fisted are, tobe considered, in ardcr to, pmvi& diveT� sue; bowe verthr. Olont mWrifil in the, fist provided, are relatively mccessM in die uniqw soil and,climactlowndi,Wns ofprqjecI shc PLANT PALETTE, A)cacia sWitins Acacia smt ips, 13"Nue Led WSW 6 Acaaia, smMH Deaert, Sweei,A"io�a, Acavia, stapophyU Shoesuiag Made, Brachyald (on popul "eus, Bo(de Tree Caiddlum. fladidma Slut PW D VWe, Claid.tilum li�brid Deiart Muscum ,Cord dJum pracom, S,onoran Palo Varde Cparr apa hurnifis Me& Pan Paltyk, chilopsht Imemis Deamt WMGW Citrus, Species C"Ptuat", sempetvirens Usen Cypress Fraxjffus UH6 'Msjes�a)�Owy LI mgreon Ash 061m, PAM"flork Anstr4im Willow Lagerstroemia, indica crapo myrtle. Lyslipma miprphyUa, viw. thomb", Felther RUSIX NOR mmpaes, Olive Olney'a Tasoft Dealed''Efulmm'd parlansonim MOW Data NUxi ran Pa I o VDrd e Phoenix daotylvfem DW.O to m Pmus ttatca Afghan Pme pis us halepoais Aleppo Vine prosopis OUWsis chiletul mewit6 Rhos Imes Md"m Sumac Sdhinma Twobinthifolius B=111"an pepperTrety Tbevedraw"In 'Yellow Ottuder LAMM"I phrvifldtil Elm taita rye SulCalias a Pan Palm. Mexican Fan PMIM 3HRUBS- Caemalpinia pulchrna Ri!d Bird or Rarmfiae r-mis", grandifim NaLal Plum Caa6,a netuopihill,a, Destrt Cass"I'a, 'Dietes 'v'apia Fcamight Uly Specific PI= 03.,067 ME 731 Dodonuca, ° tlo . Green Hopseed Bush Hanacrocallis hybiid, Day, i:1y, juaveis V.12fonlipa ctupaxosa Myrws, commonis ' ompa'ta" 4ao pat Myrae Xvidi l comes, i , Hoaverdy B amboas Photiruia frized Photrrk aa. Pbormium 'tenor' Ncw ZoWaud Flax PRCaaauPOa„uruu t ubim "W r"SDwa , Mimphideosindica ln&kia borr'N ROSSUMin,W OfIl Hnalis Rosemmy 1 s pJAjig 4stl.�ta' dIOWDOHN yMy'.�.µ,.,�yµy�,y� gy �ry�.y� Grua'MSY.%'lN,L�Iyi�IR�FSm�.��'gMA6Wpy�4�-+'ns,�is �WF �p m,'Opt,'Try oney"''mckje tltl M�.ons'wsi Wutlm �'^W x�+u�U' I �f j ry yMY R�ii,i UNCOVE MWAndolaim Desert, "c,��g of au A0,6110fis, T'a nialm B�,„ap onaggii Various �pAvil Trailingqndigo Rush, ii. avinau4 camtltlrtl'r 'No Gold' Lwtana woolovidensis Putpi,aa TrW L a4aam a' ptl+L��uaar .. �r'�i�ifol um Y yopo.tl k ��w yPrpryryolsuat akiDnEvaning pyracuatltha fbMin aana, 'irotion.. Of,raaiml'.is a, atus, 'INUS" ntig wnrara ieptopus Coral Vint a'a`t gAin'hii.iea s'� tl ,�Lf" fpfp;y��L Mytostamn SUA p "�pMq�,r yC'sV p4tlgJp py ryyNP Vino Fkus pumilara" 'pii 'i ' MkAdye,na aan alga - aat"s Claw Rosa 1.n « Udy B tlr *s Rose uA nuO Color Agava desedi DracrtAgave, Agave desuitiliftua Agave, Dasylidunwhoc,W Dart' p'aaoo Muuhlenaar a ri put Dear Grass ' 'tl tltl c ragBoar amn h,raY7gnui nn New ZeWftud Flax, 56 Spedfic,plau 03-067 Z F on-ming and Development,, Regulatiolls 3-1 SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY MSTRICTS Purpose. To, proviib)e re do via the Spevific PW Process MUch W]OW t ' I'le use of creative I and pIEuuing, and design technj�iaes to, create nwtev-plwvied dovelopmems incorpo- rating, coordinated Wilding design, irate gmedgreenbelts, phvate rmeatiara hacif lim, emphzjz- big as scparafion ail'`Wesuian mid, veliculartraffic, and. anovemll ty, The regulatiow, prescmd la relay arepursuant, WArticle Sly Audwri.ty and Seopie of Specific Plans oftbe 4ate Planning and Zojing Law of fix Gavernnient, Code, Section ,65000, (-A seq aud. are in cotnpliatze wifluffic California Environmmtal Quality' Act (CE-QA) aud amend Chaptetr 9 of the City of La, Quinta Zoning Co& (91,6029% ThezVecific plan oveslay district 111awg, var,14fions;;n t aartsr a araaraaea Taal, hand uses as pjoviWC by Salion 9.40, 0301 p cGmeral Plan Policy 2­ L 1, 9). dards and aflier features will be ma& consistait with the 6exieral Plan lay adop6on of this Spev,ffic Nam PerWood'Um The Spedfic Plan 03-067 deJinentos the pennitted usca withill 010 plan acres, Uses are tailo(TWtoindi- vidtual, , It locations within the Specifm Plan 03-067 p1mi bound , the cxW'tarn g, sUreasysteats, topography, and othex;haT=,fcjistic& Zan Mg,,DesI)Vwdom'Tbe Spwifio Plan 03-567 specifics, overlay zoning adolned in, conjuaction with appraval of the Specific Plan document ww ixitegral pait of the r=J'Ag f6r the property within dw plait boustdary and', for t1w, pta, !n aren, becomes the, Official ZoWng for the City af 'La Quinta. Pr pia zoniag shall consist ofthe base d'isffi',at symbol fbilowed Sy the qecifizc pal as symbol in pmmthmscs; for examplej,ow Diensit , Resi,danfial - LDR would be, nvIM as L D.R(RSP), Specilic Nan 03-067 3.1 733 Zoning:and DevelopinvotRegulation and Standards by Planning Area Zoning and Dovelopmend 1gvintion axid-Standards are presented for Plarming Area, I thnnigh flznias Maya VJ as seal evW4, in thc?Jann"ng Area, Exbibit und am Pregmtod in the follovnng ader: Plaviflag, Area I Golf Course GC�(T(Slp) U.SF.9 XND STANDARDS DescrifAion of Uscs in, Eli, nwing Area, I Zommng and, DevelroprInent Rqgu.J ation md Shancla-rds PtAnnin,gArca (t Medium Density Residential RM - (RSP) USES A W— 9TANDARDs Descripdon of Uses in Planning Area 11 ,Zoning and Developmew, Reguln0ouand, StandaMIS Planning Area fff Low Dansity Residential RL - (RSTI) USES ANDSITANUARDS Description. of Um in Planning!,seas lll Zoning end Devc1opmmt Ropdation and Standards Pbanning Axea W GON courso, Gc - (ASY) USE AND STANDARDS Dcscripton of'Usts, in Plaw.iji.ig Area IV Zoning and Dovelopment'Regnilabon and StandaMs Planning Area V Neikhbothood: Commercial CN- (RSP) USES, AND STANDARDS Description of'Uscs in P lanning Area V Zoning and'Development Rogtdatiou and Standards PhInning krea V1 Gulf Couese, CC - (RSP) USESAND STANDARDS Desmiption of Uses in Planning Area VI Zoning and Developtuent Roplation, atid Standards IN Specific Plan 03-067 734 3-1.1, FIamaing"Ares 1 GOLF cc URISFI-ac —,('RSP) Dewcflpt�on OfUscs in IN xnaing Area I Dic followin"L! section, C'Stablishos the permitted landuse and dcyclopwtnent standgtds for properly Golf8upportin iZI Is,e aOrd ,Faditiesafte,5s all land, widn'm Planning Ama L Within this overall plain ,boundaq, Plarmirig Ama I prqposed 11 acresdevulopatentusas, and Am- dards, for the S pwific Plan 03-/067 Golf aril Recreation, Club, ms ident, aud guest sery ing re-cre. ation amanibes and sup pportmng, to A 0, off Come Resideritial Specific, Mwi, OC-WSP) owflay krr flus F, rqjcct area is proposed 'to addre7s land ime withm Plaming Aral Nvith develoTment regulation and critefin pmenwilmmim Planning Area I of the Specific Plarut 3-,067 establishes standards farthe locatian and dvvetop- metik of recrealion, amenities oo= Meru with the resortorionfed nature of the pram: w.W prctj e ct. Cd treods in if suppordns ik"i'lifics to Serve Ole 18 hole course of Speoific Plan 0.3-067. A,. Airpose audrutleat To provide for the development and r gulatbm of arange (if speoial- ized resident and 1piestservitigy uses oriented to Golf and Teanis Club, resident and goestszrv4 mcreation center wid stipporUng uses,, located in areas desiguateJ, within Planning Area I in 111ho Specific F11WI, FormUred' Uses. Perwitted u�s (br tarid designated OC on the Land Use Plan and/oir Proposed &njrug exhibits, m5 OC-(I includes all currently Oxinftng allowableum, deli rwWmI 41 die,Cjolf Course distdct dlefineaW,ht the La QuiniaZaningy, ordinanco and as specified WWII this Specific Nam C. 2remparM & Itmeritts Met T=purary, or recurdag outdo air event staging facilities and related uses saMng (he usie and awaiw, wnstmetiort wid site guard, offices including mlovatable buitdirigs. Te:m raq gulfhDwe, sales crud marketing buildings Dnd offlems tire allowed, Po D. A=ssary Uses. Rcsort rejureaion and stage arews, and maintenance ftcifidos and sites, Sites„ forces aDd, walk, saint to the 'design chitwim set forth in this Specific: Plan doovanent. Cl :1terAlkwable, Met. Water wells annd pumping stations,water tanks and, reser-mirs, pub- lic flaDd control famlifies and devices as necessary, to facilitata, the CVWD or deveI oper in M, ter manageniv,at and conservation. F A/lawable Me Coveregs. As spwified heroin. ,G. Dovdopment Mandark, -. 'Dle foll.owirig; develoP ment standuds apply to property proposed, Spoo�Ata Plm08-0 67' 3.3 735 For developinont designaled on the Land Usc,,Plan and/or Proposed Zming exhibits as GC — (R.SP) aad as described Vnithin the, text of this Specise Plwi. Standards, tue established for all buildings, structures aW uses with Numing Area 1. BUILDINC3 DEVEIOM&NT STANDARDS Max, Building Heigbt 3 5 ft, Max. No. of Stories 2 Min. Fron't Yard Setback fro= Stet or, Parking Stat Qtrb Pedestrian Ci,rcula,tion Welks 5 ft. Oarage/Quport Sefimck 5 fL Min. T'otal Side YardSetback 10 ft** Min. Intmior/Exterior Side'Yard Setbacks 5 ft. Max —Allowable Wall, Het '10 ft,,,*** Max. Parking Requiredigh I space/250W TH'eight Is Ihnited to 22" for a wiback of 150" from —R.OV onMadIrAwn —&Avemm St *Not imlading chimney prujerAinns, geld towers, spires, etc, k#AC Unf% treltis olonrnU, pools, ead spw are allowed to e3wroach into sidt and rear sobstk areas, **#2' ofthe W ht inny be retaining with 81 firmoanding. **01The tea (0) lathe card Wmge w1H not be included hi the mrkin!gL!r5t=nt Caltulati), The following usas are permitted in PlanningArea 1. M ,I Recreation 11ses Outdoor lawn aml recreation uses. Calf and Tenris clubs or complexes. Health mid fitness clubs & Spa& Golf oourse & turf/landscape areas. Live ent,erlainmetit as an actessory, use to a "onehme" event, 2. Sevit-Pubtic Mes Museuni uses. Pails, play, fields, botanical garden uses, and passiv,e and activ,e open space area. Bicycle, strian Irails and storage facilifies,, Swimn'ting pools and spas., I Lodging Uses It alto,wA 4. Accessmy Uses Private parking lots, ewports and open-air parking stalls as mi accessory use to Residential or Open Space usm Signs in accordance with this Specific Plan. Antennas and satellite disbes in accordance v4th this Specific Plan. Specific Plait 03-067 736 Tamjwwry & Ino"rim U'Ve"? ** Interfin event jwking to fbr eveats antcipated to, extend over dir�ee or mom days Oftose, llernpaM auWwr eventstaging,facifities, "Tompontry outdoor event mging facilifics awicipatO to extend over Iluee Or wore days of use, **Construction =4 site guwd, offices, w relouat6bla buRdi':ngs. A single asterisk ind,icates an aflowable 'Use requirbig 2ppro Val Of' jj capkj�'Jion, a], (ISO Perinit firoon AcLa QzOnro ** A double asterisk indicates an allo use on a ternporaq basis mquiring iwpprovalfrom, Me L,a Quinza CommunIty Developmezu'Direclor. OPEN SPACE 1ANDUSE, Open, Space landl in Planning Area I'As defined by 11m area adjacent to the recreation lub wtentl ties. Criwia relatod to development tbe opan qnce, swoundin grecreationi club facilitile's is, presented and allowable ij) ail aTew ofP183111ing AreR, idenbrie d. "'rho %lID%dng development stmuiards apply to the, consftuction of ctub/reomatiou fiecitily buildings for supporting stmtures WhIml dw of Coursezone On property designated as GC - (FSP) on the LandUse Plan, AKCfLLA.R'V'BUII,DIN,G,DEVELA)PMIN'I'STANDA�,RDS Max Building Height 28 ft.,"' M= No. of' Stoties, 11 Nfin. Satback Awn Street or Parking Stall airb 2 ft,, Pedestrian. CirculAtion. Wks StmotureSetback, 5 ft,., Min. Building to Building Setback, 5,(1,, M,n. Lntrior[Rxtern or Side Yard Setbacks to a4*ent lot 10 ft Maximum Aflowable, Scmen WallRej,glet t 10 fl, fWight Is fiwdied w 2T for o wAwk d, I'Wfm ILOW, on Madison & Avenue 58, O'Not irwNdiag flaMmIns, Aininoy proje4do; Wj wNyall" spilw% at building projaAms net wo normcntial to at ftmaficna tow ofthe, Ommmviw b&616% oNO ova" we') Spaulio Plao 0.3-0,67 3.51 737 3. 11.2 Platining Area, 11 PLANJIM(IRSP) USES AND STANDARI)s Description OCUSCS iv, PlanningArtall laudevelopiremtustsand standards for the Spcdlan 03-067-Villas and Casitas as well as, anciftry suppoming recrewional uses and arms. This Planning,Ares is low ated C=trail' y Mthin the Castern is of the projnt sitc and eawcunpassed) 6, o,cres of Japd. Planswing, Ares.11 oft eLand Ilse Plan rwopos4 within its, boun&Aes, (Nut tw'derlying WIWI Medium Density Residential RM - (RSP). A ResAmfial Spa iti Plat (RSP) ovorlay fbr Plaiwibg, A= 11 is propose4 io, addteSS TeSids eanti k], supixxting,uses larg UK Within PlanniAg, Area TT widl dewiopmomx regWration and, criteria pre- sented herein, The development edtone for opim space, passive, and activc r=eaficn, area andi oth,cr iises, Is Also delincated for PlamWvw Ares, 11 hercio, Tbe,followingsexbon, delincates tine permiftd, land use and developinent stuvdards for prGperty designated as Medium Density Residential Specific Plan RM - (RSP) on the Land Use Plan, within Planning Area 11. A. Paqvse and [Went. To ,pro videtar the developmeriA said m—platioa of a mg, at" speaial- ized residential uses oriented W Gulf club sad, tesort liftty le, anti v ity, located iru a desigimted within Flaming area 0 fi)i the Specific'Plftn, Reproe olative.land) use inclade Rosidential owner. S14r, short tem, and tong to rentals, and leasing uses as; well ass Open Space and reemaliomiluM Perodtled Usts. Penmitted, uses for land dersigpoted Rm �, (TZS?) ox) the LandUse Mmi a Pmposad ,Zoning exhibitm as, Rm - (RSP) includes, all rnurwAly existing,miden W, rasa y- ing uses and allowable uses deliniated in the Medium Density Residential district description of the La Quinta Zoning ordinance and as specified herein. C. Rqparary& bifeetni, Us= Tmpomry or vtouning oul&or eveal sta&,g- facilities atW, rek-ted uses sarving the Rmsidendial use and ou-sitc. construction and site guard afficzs includ.hig relomable buildings. T=Tprmy sale andr marketing WKings and, offices as be Mowed. P. Amosory 11sm Reoreation mid sta,ging weas,%,v rcc:FC06CA! are eutsmaintrriinice facilities and s itos, igns, fbam and walls, subject to the desilIgn, oriteria set fo rth i il fhL% Specifto P [an doc- urmit Satellite &h,ond Dar antenw, suto this SpecifloPlaw E. Oiker Aflowabk Vsa. Water -wells and pumping slations, water tanks anti, reserv,tilr%, pub - He flacid control facilities aud, devi'zes, as imessaxy, to 5militato the or dnveloper in, Nvater rnwiagem,, ent and. COMzrvstiDM 3.6 Specific Plan 03 -067 738 R The following, de,%,clopmcaft standards apply -to popery piol,,itised for development designated on the Land Use Plan and/or Proposed Zoning exhibits as Medium Density Residential RM - (RSP) and as described within the text of this Specific Plan. Standards are established for Medium Density Residential RM - (RSP) buildings, structures and uses witilin Planning Area 11. Reside,ntial lktadied ant) ,Attscbed Ikovelopment innIs Thm stwidards apply to au hand wilbinPlamning Area 1his dc�cribedwithifi tbtt ft-,,xt aryl brraph- I 'Crs of this specille"I"Jum BIA], G HLOPMENT STA ARDS "g ----- - gg in— -1 Wx B-Olding Height I --T 28 Mm Nom of'Staii�s 2 Mirj� Li vable Floor AreaPer Unit I 500 SqIft Min,. F ront, Y�rd S a ftottv Strev, or ParkingStall Cwb 10 ft Pedestrian; C U14on Walks 5 k 62rage.Caqvit Sttbazk 5 ft. Min. Total Side Vkrd, Setback 10 ft.* *f MW,E x1etlor SWe Ybrd Setbacks 101 [11. Max,,AllowaWe WMI Fleif-5d"I't 8 R, , *** Max,, 1?arkj g Required Per, Ctarrent Code t of f,50'60W K0,14( oil Klldiscm k"Amme-58, "Not indmd"Ig, du nmey pm"thm!z, bell t4WCr5,, lspi=, --tt. AC'(Wis, pwk, md",%paq, am aflomwi to enTmach 2' nrits e'Vin. mq, "Tiv, fibilowing uses: are, jvii nifted in Planning Areal], Rer.�iv-ation [,Ws Outdoor Lawri and recreation, uses Pool/spa find, wal"er, r don tem Live entertainment w an azwssory u5e to a "one-time", event SePOO-PUblic tkvew parks, Play EWS, butaait"al gxdCD USUS, and passive, and active opc1i spox x aria,, Bicyclep =ty and IN-destrian tTails. Swirnming pools and spas. Lodging Uses Rtsj dmial usp, as dclinoamd within this 3.1 2 Irwin. sp,acific, Pjan, 03-0,67 '31 � 7' 739 4. Acceavaq,Usex Private parking lots, cart oils open-air parkingstallta its an, occessory Use to residential uses. $ips in nor dance with this SpeOJIfic P (an., Antennas sad :satellite dishes ln, mc'014auce wid), thi's SpecifIC FIVM Te?rp,0112r�)) &)Kferkn (AeS Sales qffiewv'� carostru(Aion and site, guard offices in ralbealable or mo4ulai-buildings,** 1werim event paxiang IOU for events wifi6pated to extend, overrill m or, mare days of u5c," Trapomry cowdom event staging facilities. 1"cipporwy outdoor etit st,%ming fadlitics anti cif;.% bul to extend over thice or, more, days Ouse, 0 * si i-A$Io:asIcr A is is A doulAt astc&k Indiocs 4uw allowavie ast (go a, wasporRX), kPasis wqrdriq r ra www w wrr I& L'o Q01ra ,OPEN :STIACELALN'DUSE, Open, Space land in Naming Arear '11, is deflned, 'by, the areas adjacent to Lhe residenlial units, Amenity and suppadin9 fh1 cflifies arc local ed on, adjiacant fln ers of'grembeft it whinflie devel- 9 opm emt plan wid may be pool s, fbunWns, spas,, atc. Devel opment cndtmia, is defined hemin. The ffillowing development swrAardsapply to t�he conslxuctiott of baildivo&% for supporting residenti-W unit and recreational features (such as satellite pool buildings) on property designated as Medium Density Residential RM- (RSP) on the Land Use Plan. ANCAAARYBU11,DING MVELOPMENT STANDARDS Max. Building Heigbt 28 11, *t Max- No.of'Stories I Min. SetbaA fmuxStreet or Parking Stall, Curb 9, Pedestrian Cimulation Mks 2 ft stmxcbmi Setback 5 ft, tin, Building to Building Setbwk, 5 ft.. Mitt Werior/Exterior Side Yard Setbacks -to a4jaceilt lot 10 ft. Maximuin AllowabJe Screon, Wall Height 10 1 t 1*1'ght is Ifatital 1A) zv ft a gobvouk"Of t 5,01' Imm R.O.W, on Masai & Avow 58, "Not WhIding Ragples, dimmle prqjftia5, W14, kwelv, Tph%I or batwo Vwjeclans di* aw, numnen5m),la Owo fmcbmW qpow of dw?, caumareW baWbig, (I,c bdl,kiwerp rw,) Specific Plai� 03A67 740 113 PlanningArea,M RESIDENTLAL SPECIFIC'PLAN RL rWP) USES ARD STANDARDS DtiCT114i,40 of Umms In 11m nnlingArea UT Willmn the evexall plan boundMT)ming Area ril uses and, standards (brIfic Cozat Mountsua proposedresiderulial grourinds asAvil, z.5 ancillwy goppertiTtg reqmtiaxial uses and areas, 'Mi�s Planning Aren is lo,cated throughout the pr<kject site and eftOOMPOWC; 250 acre.$, "Plannitig Area El of kite "'Dined Use Plim, propos,4 i th4i its boinAM es, one and eail ying some, Low Density 1Wsidenfial RL — (RSP) A Rmidontial SrAvilic 111sm RL -(REP) ovorby MY Pfianningkan JIT is proposed tcaddmss, res- idered idsum mimS uses lased aria widi.in Plam iing Area TH Nvi(b and c7i- teas, Imsente4 herein. The 4evelopment odlexia, 'for open sps, , pa:sive., and adilv"t., moor eanti ol"i &teas and Wier uses is, &-fimted, for Naming Area III fiateiti. RF,SID,E,NTIALSPECMC.'Pt,,�tN'(R$P) WKESAND STANDARDS 7,11'0 foil, Owing Section deb nemes, the pennitted Jamuse and develop me tit standards for property designated m Low Density ResiAcutial Specific, Plan RL - (RS."P) on the Lad Use Plan, within, Planning Area III,, A. Pkrpa&,earray lateftf. '111, pmvide for ilia development andregWat on ota runge, of special- ize d reaid enBaal uscs tmented, to gp)f Oub and resort I Ur'b*yle activity, I oca ted ira armi designmed Wid1b), FlatiningAmlit irt the Specific, Plark RzFemitafivo land me iniMi,3dei reaid ential owner. ship,, short larm and long temi renials, md lzmhig uses im well as suppotling open space and re-Creatio'llul, Us , H. Pernrimeduses. Pennitled uses for, land dcsigvial rd RL -(RSP)rear; (heLandUs*P.aver , av&m Proposed Zonhig exhihts, ns PL - ('R'SP) inchides ill outTently,existing residanhalserv- ing uws, w,id aJ lowablo uses debbexted, im, Oic Low Density Residentiii! district desenpfdon of the 1A Quinta Zoning ordinance and &s "cif,"ied bercin. Sales and marketing buildings and offices are allomd,, C Tenrorary & baMon Uses. Tempomv, or recum4ig outdoar ement staging fscibties and �related mess serving the raid met ol ase and on­sfte coustart ioten and, site guard offices h1cludbig rclocatablebuildings, D. Accessor Oevents il Rintemico farujifies y Usax. Rocxcafion and staging areps, for recreald , , m and sifes,. Signs, f=,m aod, walls, subjectto the design oritena sct fortli in thiRSpeciflic Plan dare;, um=L Sat4lite dish. and other cart crinas, subjeot teen this *cfflz Man, E. OtherAll"lable, Vxem Waterfls axid s.a.e.s ire„ s4dons, water tam maenad mervoirs, pdb- bio fload torimml Far hies; and devives as, namssm-y' to fikililett the C.VWD,or developer era -.rat tr management send comorvatiom Spocific Plain, 0:3-067 19 741 E Pnfelopmeng, Standards, "17hc fe'llowi ag djovelopment, standards apply to propwy proposed for developmont dmaiguated wi the Land, Use Planandior Proposed Zaning exbibits as Low Dejuir Residratia; RL — (RSP) and w des ardbed within'the text of th,i5, Specific, Pkn, Starkluds are established for Uw be It Residenfial RL — (RSP) buildingi, structtires and, um, within, Planning Arca� Ift. Resident] a], Detadhed and Aft*vb',ed,,Devd opin ent Slan d wd 8 These stwidards, apply to al'i land within PlanuingArea H.( m% d"cribedwi(biu the text and gmph- ia, of this Specific Plat-L BUIDING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, Max Building Heigbi 23 Vt Max No, of Stwies 21 Mira I;ivable Floor Area Pex,'Unit 15010 sq/ift, Min. Front Yord, Salback from, Stmet, or Parking Stall Curb to: fl., PBdestrian Ciroufation'Walts 5 1, Gsx4gc,/Cwpo,rt, Setback 5 ft. Mtn,,, Toral Side Yu d Setback 10 ft,** Miti,. twat eriorl Extenbr Side Yird Setbada; 5 fl. Maz Aflloiwble Waff, 1,4eight Max. Parking Requirod Per Couent C ,ado, t H40t as fln%iW to 2Z' rw a wt=k of 1,50' ftm , RJ1W cm M&fison & Aw=',Uic, 59. "Not inchjdkig i6aloairms,, W owmit slaw otc, t,p skc ujwiu' W60 40'Mcub" pooi%' mod I'M wt, 010wed to 00CMA& into SWO ao'd mar w1buk Orlow. 0*012* orMe Vht, rnwy tw, mraining with 6' fwstorWing, The followirth, uses are N=itwd iri Planning Arta IrIL L Rft-veatfon Urm Outdo,ofr lawn and rccroatiowuses PoWspa, as water rccreutiuuusvq: Livo entertainment as an acctssory Lwe to as "one-fime"event. 2, '3=4-pubho Usev Parks, pLay ficUs, botanical garden uses, sand passive anclutive opensp= arce. Bioycle, cart, and pc&sHan tmfls. Swimming poold spas, on Sp.ziL PI., 03 -06 7 742 4. Acoassoo,o W4,,� Private rmrkmg laq, carpMs "d open-air pxking to as an acm&wry we lo Fv%identW iise& Sigrz, in accardance with this Specific, Nam Mterwas and satelhw Wshcs in accoidataw Mdi th Speciffic Plu. Temjioraq & h2terltri I/PeN Sidcu' qfflva, conmuctionand, pard oices in'relocatable ar modularbuildihp, in, ii,rn twent lmkirg tots &r evexts, anbcipaW to extm,d overthrec, or mixe days of use." Tcm,poTwy outdow cvcnt staging facififics, Tornporary out&or event staginfl facilifies aaficipaled to extend aver tbree or ma�re Sys, of use�** 4'A 81agla asWisk ire dica W- an allbwoble sage,, nkywhipW, ty pyvoved qf a Ojimildonal I.AvAivairfim tho La QvIntv phiming A, dmble asterisk jrWjan A'awable we an a waiponvy bask, rvqrrh,,hW as powd fiviot tha, IA Qufma Dhvri6r OPENSPACE LAND USE, OpeA Space ]mid in Planniog Aroa, Iffis definod, by the areas adjacAmt to the residmotial Wifta, Amenity ud, supporting fadlides are located oin, adjaceiaig m.. of'greenbelt wi it One Bevel- opaneut plav be pools, fi)ontains, spas, cto, Developmmt cdteria is defiticAther elm The following davolopment standards apply, to the constmotion, of buildinp for supporting, m-sidarntbl tuift and recreational fealures (sucIas satelliter pool buildings), on, propmly desipated as Low Density Residential RL — (11,SP')on the Land Use Plan., ANCILLARY SUILDOW OEVE LOPMENT FUNOMM Max. Building Height 28 ft,:*t Max,. No. af,%Ides 1, Nfii, Sabacl' from- 8fta ovpofting LStafl Curb 2 ft" Podestdan OrMatifflWak; 2 k Struclu-ce Setback 51 Min. Building toBuitding Saback 5 Min., ITiterior/Exterior Side Yard Setb,acks to adjacmt lot 10' A, Maxiinuin Allovable Savoi WhIlHeight. 1, . . .... . . . ....... — . ........ . . HOIFAU, Is limllcd' io 22'115or a sebkk or 150'fim k DR on Ada au & Amm, 59, No?''I'DrAmAng MIgROW" ON'= projoOdon�' WI folvera, spim's, or btiMing projvOUVIN diatuo antmAtial to d1b ibnOwAl Sp ce i fie Plan, 03 -0 67 3.11 743 3.1.4 Planning A,rea IV COURSE OC-(F;SP) USES AND STANDARDS INstwi, pfionaMars,war rrtrw, Within the overall p1ma boo adirry, Flaming Area IN" encumpass es, develojment user, and ratan ,air ds for the Sperific Plan M-0,67''proposmi Golf Come maant enance1kcility as wall as mcillwy sup. N.rh'Aggrely uses,. This 3 acre Plannizig Area is located at the fitterseofion, of Madison, Street said Aveaw, 60 i the south, em bo-w3dary of the pfqj"t sh�e., Ptamiit]g Ama 11-V offlie Lmid Use Plan presently has, widibi, its bouridarje.9, me Laiderlyin,g zaac, M — (R S P), A Specific Plan, (R,SP) overlay, for Platt Area Wis prallos ad k) address golf cousse supix),ri. ing imes land use wiflfiii Planning A3va IV' vdda dfwelolin7ent regulation and ard.feria presemi: W, hereinThe day eloom onte7itemfoT ot1wrims is deli."I"Ieatedfor',,Pia nniii,gArL-a IV hercht RES ]DE'NUA LSPECIFIC PLAN (RISP) USF)S &ND STANDARDS The folluMng SWfi(Mr delineates the Mmitted land mse and development,mwidards for property d"- ig"ed as GO CAkame Specific Plan GC— (TW), on tho Land Lrse'Plwi, withirt PlannirigArcs, IV. A., PUrpose andimleirt.To p7ovide forthe developmeot and regulabon of a, nulgeof slvcrab d- ized mviutenaxicc as oriented to golf'course located in areas : designated withim, Plauning AmU' IIV la the Specific PlAn. Represontative LanA 'use include gotf and open since nlaintmance buffding, use and supportinoc,iMary imictions to that- wsc Tt, Peradved Uses, PaTuitled 'uses, for, land &sigoawd OvC — (RSPB on the Lapd, Use Plam, and/or Frol)osed Zoning. exhibils as, OC .- (RS?) inoludo-s all ourrentlymisting, rnairateramice I'mild- hang wM"g uses and OBOwablo usm d'ofillwW in t,ho GoJf Comse dishiot,desoription ofthe La Quinta Zorniv, oTdinanze m, id, as 5perified herein. CAmWorarp & biradhi Mow. TemporaTy m mittring avidoor event staging fachail vs and related, mses sorvftV the maintomice, tm, and ran -sit o comistraodron and site guiwd offlices, and r0o. catable buflairs p. fin Awmary Uvs. fuel,, and, supply storage imideatal to tho operations ofthe nWriufflance fact. ities and, sitem. Signs, fencw mid w4s, subjwt to the desigjr) orited'a set W, i in dais S pecific Plan documcut as as required by law, SaWlite dish and other antrimas, stifwt to dais 8,,pccific Plan. L 60erAtlawable Uses. Wact, wells, and gvnipbg statiow, waler lankand reservoirs, pv'b- lic flood control facifitios tarsi devim as'ne"asary-W fimilitate tht CVWD oT, develaper in; water management and conservatim). V. D*.n)eJ'apmat, %'tWm6t&. '11= following developnizat standards asy to, property proposed: for, donlopment, desigmated an, the Land Use 'Plan and/or ProposW Z,oning wNbits as Golf Come OC (RSP) and as drwribed ma"thin the text ofthis Specifib Plam Standards are esta,'b- lished for Golf Course CC — (RSP), bandings", structizes and, useswithin Planning Area IV 3-1 z Specific Rim 03-061 744 DEVELOld NENT STANDARDS Wm, Building Height 28 ft.*J` Mx"NO I tofYSarek f MirL-Fronud Sdbacronr stroct Or Parking, Staab , Curb 8.1, Pedestrian cim, lation"We"Ib 5 ft" GaragdCarpw Sebsol 5,11"" Min. Total Side Yard Selback 10 11" Min, Inte'Hor(Everior Side Yiird, Setbacks 5 ft" M&v. Allowable Wall Height Max Plarlang R—equired Per Current Code t Height is, liatiW lo 2T fbr a stawk of 130" fmm, R.O.W ai Wdiew & Memo 58, OV4 illehlidil US dfiiii projtCliol'o, 1,16JI'MrM, no ras, rle,, ftifis ekw=,.Ujxxjs' M-A Y'Pas mair nftck arcal" "[W." of lho 9 1 lit a WnAzio4ig w0h fil fivtoandiog, The following uses are pam, iftled in'Pl=iingArea IV L Reonearion, lb&.� I Outdoor lawn w, id, rwreatkowwcs. 2, SOnf-Public Uses, and as iv and active opm space Swimming Viols and spa.% S�aii Uias ruelstarage', uric inaidental w nliaintenauct btulding fwations 4® Aweswor,Y Usev Pfivatic parkiog lots, mrports and opus -air parking stalls as an accessory, use" to matotenanzo Nuilding wes. Sigm in accondagar ce with this Specific Plan, Antennas and satellite dishes in accor&nce with this Swific Plam I &mpnw-aq &- Interibi Wes Ate: guard offiewq ih Flo le or modular buildffips,* 16terim ",erit 1wiflang lets for events, axi'licipated to extend ever tune or rwre days ar, rust'.* * "Fruporary outdiout evetwL staging fazihtiw TL-mpomry outdoor wow rut staging facilities onficipmed to ew d ovicr,wee of mom days of 11 so, * A �08jo astedisk inckates an allown'bie, U30 iWPOI-61'r, raw i Candiflanal U"m Purm"(ftam ati; La Quita" 114willAg" Coln"6,001r, A drmSla affi,evisk imidiratcz an fl� �O'A'Rjyjer jjNe� ion a toju Pomy bah nquirimig, ap 'I prwmW ftri"i Oic La Qvinin Skoi�4& c, P I an 03 -106 7 3, 13, 745 3.15' Pfanniugkrea V CND-(;) USE AN'D STANDARDS Desm"fim of Ulm W plauaihg Arch � 'Within (he owrallplan, bout0axyl Plananig Area V onwrapmsses devclopinent um and standards for, the Speciflo Ham; 03 .067 Nei ghborhom, cornmercial, centeras Wd, I as ancil Ifiry stipporfing, uses. This Planning Area is located at the Southeast corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58 on the northwestern boundary of the project site. Phwnm, g Area V aftho Land (Iso Plan Inoppied, i6tWn its boundaries, one underlying one Nejgjiborhood CarnmerciaJ CN-,(RSP) 01), 4.5,BOTC9 of laili, Permitted was in, the CN Zonigg, Distria, will combine essential fty-to-day neigftborh<Xxl goods and services, tourisni and, visitar-based retAl xestaurant find ffinited entedainment opporuwntic s,and facilitics necessay for IN; opemliorml deawnds of such ass. The, fbllawingwoo* � are Innnitted in Plaara ung Arm N AvAb review of developluentprop),sals Senemlly conf6ritling to this Specific Plan, and, may require submittal ofa Site 1 evelcFpnie;nt'PerTnit„'l,,!mt )erary UsePermit or Other long, Of 311011 t,enn approval package at the discretion of the Q.)wRituifty Developinc,nt D opamri W, t Ti "OREFOOD CO AMERCUL CN- (XISP) USES AND, STAN OARDS The fbflowinP"Iton definere, tho pertnitted, land,. use aid dovelopmeut smudw ds for property des- iv, attxt as NeighbadiarxI Commercial CN,(I UP) ton the Land Ust, AaP4 within PIwining.Ayea V. A. Parpe.ve anArnlent, To provide for the development and regulation of as ao of spocial-, ized neighborhood iming, c-otutnerciAl and retail, uset oriented to Golfclu) and resort, llfestyie activity, located in eaus designated, within Earn* a%Vez Vin the Speoffic Nam Rqpresentafiye land use, includOS Deighbor ,,, hood serving comuneruid and mud) use and supporting, unciflary, fine- tions. to those uses. R. llenWfted Mes, -11emitted uses for ],and designatedk P Neighborhood Commeroial CN�(RS ) on theImid, use Plin wid/or Propwod ZoMlig cxNbits as Noi ghborhood, Comm=ial CN -(T6l`) inoludeg all currently existing, ninin'tenatibuildi,ng servinguses Litul allawobtug uses delmoated ia the GO Course di trier description of the La Quint . Zoming ordinance and u spocifted hereia. C. 716mporatp & ltdvAM.V�ex. Tempoy ornoun ing, outdoor event 5Wiging facilities and mlated uses serving, flie Cornmereirduse, on -site, construction and sitegliard offices and relocat- able Niildinl;s, Ternpuraxy,5ales and marke,Uag Thuldings and offlices = allawW- ,y Orey. Signs, t6um and walls, subject to the, design, cifteria set fhah, in this Spcoific, Man do=nvat ?* as required by law, Satc1lite, dish and rather antminaz, silbJer'l to this, Specific, Platt '131,14 SperAic P lan, 0,3 6 1 746 lip OtherAUmPable USU. "water welland pumping stalions,xvater lank:s arrd rest nrir , pdb- lic flood cootrol facilities rnd dmir ss , necessary to facilitate the CVWD or developer inwater. v=,apment aDd. r nsw tararn., DeMqpmeju Staitd4r4 'fie &I'lowing development t rndards apply'lo property proposed fr developinent desi on, thLand T"use Man and/or Prnposed Zoning; exhibits as Golf. CA)urse Ni bborllo d Coinr i l N SP wid qs described within the text of tlris Specific P19,11 Standards are established for Neighborhood Commercial CN".- 16)building; stractureis Ud uses within PI atining Area V.. Ighh r boa l Cosionercial and Developmeol Stgndards, Miesestandards apply to all land within Planning air rr described itlydrr the wd and,grapli. ics of this Specift Plan, BITIDING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Number rah Stories Mirnirrn rrr Front Seftek, 1()IT Minimum Parking 11250 H L Maxi.mum Lot Coverage; (FA R.) 25 Minirnwn. Building Setback to Avenue 58 25 1 itriu,ii li t ri r teri r i hard BrAwks 5110 ft. Maximum Wall Height 10 ft. .... a r tmir r�nraarn4 smrnrt r rtr 9% provi ft kabittable or mfirrwise�a mar�t��a� �� s to nn t:wr neys, opires, fini la, mad itintlar I-AtwMutt bu ,pennitted to Wand up no, ten f'wi a ovta the m r intui n s^ nuA"r ar Tho foll n ivin uses are permitted in of Plaragng Arenn I Sri ism,. ReWl marchajidiss Wes of fimited gonads(goods that can be carried out, b OW U11stomer), such q artliques, appliarims, hicyoles,wiOlesale and/or mt foods, ar shape and Ines, tabacco produaq,,kitchen and bath shops, video and audib eiqopment,l , pols aid pa supplits, 6ffite eqWpnent and suMJies, party and/or ° . trurrne r rnt l , n d ,, home ,t crnis bgs, lwdware andhome finproveinent I~terrn , end other related iterrrs., . Pubho Oes. Restamantsand prepared food service facilities thaluding, resta,rnr ,ts„ deli'.. t s n, tca, cone and, ire" err:;- sho , pimmiss, and similar rnsrns. Man sar d frnrrd .sold spexif- ically for, on -$Ito consumpfion�,with indoodoutdoor seaflng. Such Uses inOude fine dining g wad rather low to medium tutnover resms ; cocktail "lounges, dinacr clubs, spores luradlounu bar/grill, might clubs and similar sera, with alcr l°u l sales for on -site`` l7tinonly, ling with live, reicorded or other entertai tunen tin rnr outdoorssuch as, rrn usic midlor dancing, karnoke, arcade, an ie , col., billiaTdor ahu l bo d tables, ate. 747 3, Special uxat Pracesgiunal Service officas providioglimited sales, slich as veterinzy, clinic, dierician, optician, Gatering, attomey, Tew estate, bmia"IS, mortgage broker, social and cornmu-nity SiCC OMCCtS, Pj'Qp6r(Y 31L Ifle ' n( fjnan is ,C, I Se rvices, beautician, barbar, reproduo6on service, tailor, Cleaners and 13IM(by, !postal S Micez, shoe" watch,jewelry and biqcle repair, and similar rises,. Offices will) larger scale, ane,a ' aspects, such, as Ifinousine and auto rental., Indoor m oatdoor prof-6sional wt saAos, rats ply s widlor gallenes, for, Al arbs6c endeavors and production, to, include dhnce, pabifing, soutOng, cerarnies, jewelry, glass blowing, pliotography, handin ade fornWire, stane, cimli-n-9, amd similm nativities. The*.rc ma , presentatiom, and displqs or 6 M_ ons,1=6ons to the, publie t Aa,,essoi- y Use.^ I'l.iiValte parking lots, carpoils and ope�n-ajr paxEng Malls ors an, acces:a&ury use to cannnercial WIding unes. SiSms in. =ordzace wifli this Sjxzifie Ham Antaunas'and Satellite dblkes in accord a ncewftb 'this Sped-fic P'lan. 5, Runporaq &Lnterim, (A, 4s,° Site ffmrd offices in re locatable or rn(Aalar ba"ildings raterim eventparkhip, lots, I'ar eveaLs widcj pated lo m-nd over duw or inore day's ofuse. T6,nlporary outdoor evont stating fkoflities�, 'Tonporiuy ouW1 or event stapng fix:il,;Wes anficij.YaW rD aw''O over duee or morv, days of 6. 01herAllowable Use Public indoor assembly/eMertairment 11heilitics, such its aa&toritans, theaters, dirinex thwers, conferepee cenler, gymnasaint Wilifies, coacert, halls and related use, Wont factlities for educadar, trainingself-help and improverierut, bobbies, orvocational plarpose, bath, j.mbfiG and pri. Tbese Ynky be local in any fa,61iticm Indoorloutdoor ctjftural� hist.ario tad similar displays and, galleries forall types oftnif"Ws and/or artisfic mediuch as'nav=U111S, a'action houses and coaril gninent room, Such us= nury iwNdp, silc of d6pkiy art pleces. A singlo aft6sk indicahm an all oribi is use mquirkng qppow J'qfa CopulldoW, Vvo the Lea QuInta FkOodlig A doobie Wrtisk tndi cal.", ws allow4bla aw on, a wmpotaq to requiring qp"m1W fir „Na Mg La Qnfto 111C pejakitted 'uses in, Planning Area Vda nol prrxlude other sirmai Lir uses which ate, Coca- patible WkIl''t1le S1=14cally idelliffied uses aud olfherwisD meet the criter [a ror this, Speciflo Plan aiid tficcmrmfly up proved Neighborhood Commercial District v6tbili the 1,a Quinia Zowag Ortfinance. Any, dztennirwdua on a0roposed use wlwther IWO oir u6stedlirrein m#yIre cx'ther inter- nally reviawed by Cio Comrouvity Devdun prinnit'Director or Plannlbg Manager DT refeved -to the Planning Commission, as a nan-hearing itelin ifflie C'osiimtiiility'[)ctvelay( PTTient Direckv or Plani'ling NbaAgee r dctcimmes oa a, rzose-by-canse basis that t'l ubfic interest would be, beflex sowed by slith mfbxral, 5. 1, 6 Spmci& P6u O'5_067 UM 11.6 Planning Area VI Golf Course GC, kS111) USES AND STANDARDS Vacrip doo of lrses�,I'mk) anniji r, Arto 'W Within diz ovenili plan boundary, P4nning Area VI emompasses 295 acm, s f development for the Specifir, P'lan, 03-067 propased Giolf Course as wrIl ws ancillary supportimE, us'es. This Manning Area, iskoanted Ibroughout tine site , Plaming Area VI of the Land (fise, Plan presently, addres,941S 295 acres within its boundario, one wderlying zone, G C — (RSP). A SImaific Plwi (R3,P) ovoday' Im Plarining Area M is proposed to adcktss of coune sqppOA- ing uses land use wilt, 6111mming, AMI'VI With dm1opmont mplationaw aitmia, pjrsenot zd borciu, Tim developineni C-fixeria for 011"Imuse is d0[ max] -faT Plaxming, Amu, VI herej,41L RESEDENTIAL SPECEFIC PLAN (A!5F) VNESAND STANDARDS The following sec6on defimales the parmifted, land arse wid devellopant cut &Iandards for propmty ties-, igmted, as Golf Coimxae.qpaific Plan GC - (RSA ,on'the Land Use Plan, within PlamingretiVI, A. Putpose and ides a'. To px)vidc for tk- dove'lopmenot and rgulatiop of a ranSe of spec; W- ized of andotvn space us oriented to Golf club andresort remation [ifb*Ie mid activity, Imated in amas desigtmW within, Planning Area Vt inthe'spwific Plan- PLeprezen,,tativelarva vdl,-Qse inol ude Solf;and, cqxn saw we and supporting recreavon ruttcfiom to Limit me. B. Amp*mPmnitled aws for Imid designated OC — (RSP) on the Land, I.Jse Plan, and/or, Proposed Zoning exhibits as GC -- (RSP), incl,udes al,l oum, nfly exiifing golf soming ases wid, willowable uses delirmted, is) Lhe CTolf Coume, district descniptioiiof fiv La Qadnta 7'Onfiig ordinanco axid as specified lie win. Sales and rtinxkating buddings and, offices &re allowed, C. Rmporw:p & AteAnt, Uses. Temp),raxy or recuri,,iag, outdoor not staging Nzilitir's and related uses stming the Gaily as we and, on -site consMidion and sita guard offi= inctuding re,localable building& D. Accavory w 11knitcd find and boverage saies throViout the, if wurse area and Accessory ficilifiles (SU411 os comfort sta'dons and vonding,booths) to that use E. Otar erAlloupable, Uses. Water wells and pumpingstations, waxer tad6; and mstrv&rs, pub - I ic flood' controlfacili des and, devices as necessary to fwilitate IJie, CVVM orrevel oper in Neuter F. Dewtotwepa Silandards, Vve following developmeant statylard's, 4pply (o, prol; (y proposed for devellainn ent al sign an tit a,Lm'bliss Man and/or Propowl Zoninhibits, as Golf Course Sparlfic Plan 03-067 3 T "? 749 GC, -. (R.SP)and a.% dtq,mbed Mthin the text fthis Specific Plan. Stmidards are esitablished for Golf Course CC ..-- (RS"P) bWldiggs, stivetures and uses with, in Pluminig Oren" L Gelf CvmrseBuflding Staridarils, These standards apply to all lmd widiin Planning, Area A ns described witifin die texi and ppph- ics Ofthis Specific plan, BUILDTNODEVELOPMENT STANDARDS !;i iffill'@1 i 0111: Max RuflAirig Heiglit 28 titt, No, of & arjes 2, Mim, FT(Yof YmrdSetbackfironri� Sized or Parking Sit]] Ckdb 8 fi's PcdestiW Circulation Walks 5 ft, Gm-age/Carport Setback 5 ft. mill Trutt Side Ysid Sotbadk 10 1" Mim Inirrior/Exterior Side Yard Setbacks 5 ft., AU,owmble Wall ffie-ight 8 fl.*** Ma,x,. Parking Required Per Cim.rent OiVinanca MA; imiLding cf&moy W'I Imm is, vpims, aim, AC UgAlts, ImUis akivitails, pwfa, and spas am a[lowad to moroach, Luto sidt aiad mar x1book um, fie- 21 of Ibes" U MV be MWOWS,,Mfla 6'6,vedmmhqg, '11e tblkming ivws are pemitted, in Planning Arica VL Jklecreadon Uses Golf coum U.%" PODI/Spa and water recreation US,CS, 2, S'v;?U�Publk Was Wintevan ce bufldirig uses,, tind passive and, a0ve open spacema. Pwking facilities for employees of the dlavelojxnerust. 3. Spacial' Uses Fuel storage, fern fizerstarap. and rinse incidental to golf mrse opsr oxzs 4Accesvor), Usmv Pr.�vaft parkirg lots. =Wvs, an, id open-air paftig slaltq as, an accessory use t,o mainlienance Imildiauses. Signs i,n wcor&rme whin arise Sfmcific Plan. Antmmmand sateffdishes in accordance with, this Specific Plan, 5. IkInpormy & Interim Site pard offizes in r6[ocatable or modular bui1diaga. 3-1.8 Spe oiiic P L-t 03- 06 7' 750 Tempos utdoor event staging favilifics related to golf operadoris Temporani owdow ownt stagingy 661ifies anficipaled, to extend over three or twiv days: of ust A Mnoo aswdsk, i a6catr:i an mflow&We wm raquiring qpproval ofa Cond(Ooned Uso Penottfrom; Me La Qif aw PAwynhir Commilysion., A doub] e mm&k indicates mi ailownhIc me mi a uPmiporm ry basis mqrdripg eqPprova) AT,,#P; &e Lii Quima OPEN SPACE LAND USE Open Space land, in MawIng Me a VI, is, dollmed by the arem adjacent to 'the Colf Cot"c suptvetirlg Pacilibes ax, located on adjamt fingers of gmmbeft Nvithin -aw dcv6opment p1ml, The hilmmig develoMent standards apply to Ilia for suPporti'lig golf and resideadial fcatwes (suchas restrmm buildbgs) orndui opo" dmigualml as, Golf Course, GO- (RSP),on the; Land Use Flm . . . ............ . ..... -.1-11-1 ...... ?&x. Budding Height M ft." MU, NO, off" 'Stones, 1, Min. Setbad bwl: Sfteet or Parking, SIAICurb 2, It, Pedestriaft Circulation willks, 2 ft, Strudure, StIback- tilt. Min, BOding to Building Sothaok. 5 ft. Min. InteriorlExtenor Side Yazd Setbacks to a4jacent, lot It 1 Maximum AllowWe Simma WaJI Reighl sk *Not MudiptWildim " lon-9 that mft nommraw, to &a fi'mr.60nal apow of d1olmdIdim"s (ED, bell 10"TM Co.) WWI may Ontow im Oao. l6owd IF mulotht S opwilie Pint) 0'3 -067 3139 751 3.2 4SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Knor inadMcatian5 to the approved Spa6fjr, Plan 03-067 ate allowed at the disaretion of the, Conxilixtiu,ty Development Ditector or'Desigucz, Futuremodifications lothe Specific Plan 03-0167' must be consistent MO. the purNse and, inW, ofthe cumen't approved Original Specific Plan and its amendments. 3.2.1 Specific Plao Amendment Proced'ur", A.9 development MiAn the Specific, Plan 03-067ptogresses,,, �t ratky, be demow'Arat cd that certain doail c1mangps are appropri., ate isirt"fr"Clylent of the Speoifir, Plan; themfore it is iralvided that the Speanfic, Pimi 130,cu'rocilt providelie xibility ivilh mpeetto die iaterpretation of the delails of prqjed davelopinciA as well as those items discussed in general, WFMH m UIC, SpMifiG FIRM ff a[VI WlIMV it iS (ICIM131ined thal changes or adju.91jinanus am rvoccassyy or aPI;,voprime, rhose, clwgrw or a4justmanL� shal"I be made as an, adunil6sirative procedurc approw cd byflic Community L)OVeloptnew, Director, or designee" Adler such mhlninisvativa chauge bas Ixen aplyrovmi, it shall be aftache'd to, the specifiC, PIMI AS ,an addendum, and may ble Awthe-r changed ud, mended, from tines to, time as nccess.vy, Any such adminisbativochars, es do not ragpira a Specifle Plana amendment process. 'n'I"D rollowing chavgts to tho Specific Hart may'lle inade whLaut amendhig time Spec i.flc Plan 03-067: The twisfor of dwelling units fi-cm, one planning a to anothermAthin a single pla,nning area While maintaining, the mniranni- overall, Speoific Plan dwelling unit awnber of wifts, "Flic addition otnew, inn famationto the SpwAic Plan, maps or hart do not chaqgeltho eiThct of"' any replation. The n mv intonnatiou may include raore ddaAes, site-specsric information. If thib information demonstrates that RImming Area boundadess are inaccu- rately designatod, based, Upon the goahs, ofthe 8rxtific Plwi, said boundalies Infly bla adjuswl', to veftl a, more accurate depiction of on -site coculitiorm, without requiflrxg, an Specific Plan Arnendnrmt,., AdjuAmenU to, the rjolf'oorridorg suay, be made rep,416ng, in m, corresponding Mange to the adj'acent, developmentMarcel without Cie requirement of a,, spedc plan amcndmmt, Changes to tho conununity k&astructure sudi as drainage systains, roa&, water and sawer systerrm, etc, whiah do tat ha , tbe. effiect of inercuinor decreming capacityin the, project areabtTwId the specifInd derlskry, reams nor increas,e 1hr, backtn,m infrastruc, tu,re crams truckon ormaintenance costs, Changes That ReqWre A Spwo41art Anundimpa If ithEv: been, djetarmined that JI'm proposed change, is natin, cout5ormance with line intent of the current Specific, Planapprovat, thc Specific Plan auiybe asitendNI in ac;cordaive Avith the prute- dums set forth in Chapter 9.240 ofth, City of La Quinta-Zon ing Co& 120 8, pbeiii a P lan 03 -06 7 752 Mie irmfer o,r roslidential doushy from, onz Residential Plarming Arta to miother Residential Plair a[%3, Area wifliin tht Specific PUn 03-067 bouaftryis pennifted based upon flic provisions herein. Rovisions to die Plan,nirg, A,rea Swistical Summaries made in accord , with, then c pro-, visionsdo not, require an, ate oxidmont to th,e specifio Plan, Transens of dewqity rray lie approved to W ax, reduce thenumber; of units withim a given, Residential Plumning Area upito, last not, excleeding 25% of the T4et Units for each Plarmdng Area, Residentiii densit y may be. transkrred, ftom any Residential Plwiniag Area all owlog residential, development touuyvher Resideordal FImming krea ellowing residenfial develop, art rcW, dless orf''PIMInhig Area locafiollintojisity i-esidemballand use category. Within, tim Plamning Area recalving the timisfarred den sily, the perujittril density xieW not bc cvimily,(]istributed, to all, sub- divisions which oomrxise the "T=eiving" Planning Area, Applicohon for Density Tmns�r ShaJ] be, rande, hi wiRiog, to the Cbromunily Development Dirmtor oy designee, air shaj I include the fol- Jowinv, Location of prDperties to lie involved, in the transfer inoluding the Planning Areu orn6orlot or dW,rict degignations. 71he wimber of units to'be transrerred ffam mm, pI artncd we to a w4hm A calculation, o,f acreagt, for are aftectod'Pranning Area, showing the ==1 numixt of allow-, able unIts, the proposed number af ifflowablaullits ibr the offmied Planning Areas, atut, if die Inawf6r- is Vprove4 the inarmqe and, dm,=se (cxpressed as a porcAmtag!0 of dw previous approvaJ,unit count). The Con intitV Developtntat Director or designee shalt approve the Density Transfbr if the; faIlDming conUicms = MeC The, overall Soak of D the S ecifi Plan 3- as amended are maintain,,ed., P The 1"`t ! ranofhousing stock remaiias avaj lade,, on malty. &cflities sa& as solinots and parks can acrorrmto&le tbc additiowd unRs i� the affected area, Infrastructu're facilities, such as roads, sawor, and water can accol mrn;dilate the ail ditionatunits in the affiected area. proposed densities, are cono patiblo v4th, existing Ctof 'La, Quinta General Plan Land Use, desig� twtions. Spaai,fio?6i,) 03,-06Y 911 753 Oien,tea l,Plan Consili,ste,ney CaWbrr6a Government Code (5'ifle 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Artiel't 8, Section 65450 - 65457') pem,its, the: adaption, and administratimi, ofspt50fiu plans as an implornmWon toot forelements Contained irithe lacal gexlez-Al plan,, Specirk PlAns alt dem.onstrafe corLsistenzy hi regiflations, guidefines and prqramith, the goWs, and policies set fardi, in ffiegeneml plan. The sty of1a Quhiln General Plan conts-ins, thfollowijig demantsm and Use, ChvMation, (Dpoi Spce,, Pwks and Recj-emrioln, R,Virawnmifal Cons Mnation. 'InNstruchre, and Public Services, Envas vnmenW Hazards, Air Quality =4 Bousing Ewjl e1emelit of the Gear eml,plan cm,Wns to sununaty of kq, issms which (firec�t aml guide, that cl enicuit"s, SoWs and polIcim, The gvnm y of it issues is usQd !A the Specific, Plan 03-067 as the basis for evalwing tlle Spw,iftc Pban"s, consistericy with IM City's Getz PlarL Appjicahle key issues are mated Mow f6ilowed, by astarement as the projem l� Specific Plan as amended mnfwms ikerero, 4.1 LAND USE ELE MENT MainWning the City's low dftisit , residentiW oharwtm with to balaaw of supporbug conunarcial apt W coramani�y facilifies. The Larwi Me Mew qf Sperific Pbun 03. 0( 57 dexignaretT riser #Wority of the, ,rite ai°, Low Danxio� Rdsi&orval ass W6,11, w� (?penSpaaa mid (7?)(fuse, Supparging Plan in areav aa�lovenl to cvivring syppm'Hog, The City eqjqyas a reputation as, a desirable, localo, The Ci,`s atue and-attrwOve charwer to ftom a. combinalion of its envimn.muntA mtdaig neaf ihe; mountafiis, the, "La Quinta." irangD- . TU Developer P ,11he SpeO florlan 03-07 Alavrer Plan eryoj4v a foundarion, qf hoving naflonaily recagnine d go�,f everils cupitizlizing on, and rdmjbrcing, the Ci'�y,� Unique 301ting ./br Ohamptomqhq) g04, mcreafton =1 thv nofrwWy thw comes wigh, ,pn4rW(,Pr,9parNqg m0ent broacleasts As d1to Commexciall devetopmcut continues in the City, Potential incompatibitilies 'between land usewill, nm-dto be addrcssed. Msual, audible and odorifeaous impacts vall have, to be addrc.*sed 'dirough design., buftring, screening and other,,mi,,d Dn'tec'hniqWs Spec is Plan 03-067 devigntisey, the mqjaj,*), of the Me as Low NPWO, ReWdential and' champtanship goamwmffev, Sul)pm-ring and a4icumani, e,'16melopmerat is plapuzed in a ivrfory of heighrr and Naiparlans Or order to minimize, the 14-sual impact while, ,proi,iding greenbelt eareeng, to negalive j?rqPeqY, wf7wnc" aka ch fis &(Iffrc noise and,'rataied impoaft Spec E, ific Plan 03 067 4.1 754 Tbe wivJ of' w4W mideitW subdivisiorw ho nz-,ulftd hi, wany tyW of , , w pedamter an uvatmenu in Ow aiy. 11w design Of 'Giese WJS And Am e1mvem, of the stm-twape slhoWbe, coorxHnoWd to aeste 910m of as colifinuc us mtomoaul, the emlim Community, The peripwefO ivall Ireatmenr SN",r?jiv Plav 03-40:67 establishav a cvnsiveod them-0 vi and ivaltmeannertes4V 07YOOtled by fhC Cfty Al thiS Uarevmvt Maintain tbeCity's low und,cm, munity facilities, The Land Use Plaw 0 she SpevIfk Flag; 0.3-067Sedf ic I'lim designatads" die mad'�,vajo ofthe site ao, Lmv emay ReO41mvivt Residkwual mo-ving ronmwmW d,-,veIqpnwnx tvpIamxdwjdjjA tho Noighborhood Cbvvne?V4I land use of thu,3 Development shouW not bo allil, hillside$ not alluvial fan arcus 10 protect the scenic, Imurm of,,�'tha City. The prqject houpirhvy of Specfj3c, Plan 03-067 is ours' de qj- the pristhm 12411sides and alluvird, fan areas, and,thenYbro gwim-wo4v no iApo otto rhase vatuable, ravurces 4.2 CIRCULATION ELEMENT Roadway olassifications and dasign standuds shouid be based on airrant esfimates of build -out refteedng approved dovaIppment prqj�am Developmeat Nrundamk, oaf ,perimetur roewdwqys, are cvublixhad in Oo General Pfan Circulation ElF.Mew. IExisdrxg atuipropmrd. roadway inipmvemcfas in apa!d around thr', par 6oundbjy are 6aved on owmml esvinalev� (�" buW-Ooa erW con"astem wah 00,goo4v and,pohviyawv ar traarrlt marl i s tlrs taar araaa rl wra rarrrarat t7 ,fdf,F ('iV= Val P670L Alteumfive, circulauion sysnam improvements need to bD dovvlopcd, to relieve, traffic wn.gestion along Washington Strad* SpecPlait 03-067ahumMadison mug,' Monroe &PC64 andrukes, priurary andeecmkiT romd'"Oqp. Impavis, to Jefferson Lqtmef am tywHinell dije, to the &Wunce ffion the piv),eapt sile. lhffic imp acts ,resuffirig ftona devetopmeat should be identifiled through a mandatory fraffic impact analysLs pmc m:. D'eveloprnmu, pqjucts at *mrlfic Plan 03-067are sobjecir to elhis milukiment eukiNhOzed in. t1 DeveJopronae d6,11matOd in rh*,!�,0#ic plan doolu"On't as mnended, Pedestrian and, bicycle ndwofks should be developed wliich link autivity cauters, in ordex to far.iliftft, reomational waildng and biking and to emblish non-automoti've lmnsporMfion as a viable, aftemadve to, d6vin& Internal go�f c4a, Ncyde, and lvd4vto"lan aC!(,Vs4 1v h1corporalod h"; the (`Nreidatia)? plar )br Speca fiv,Plxt 03-0,67 oui hv axommadated on, tine exiving andpicomed roadwayvywom. 4.2, SpeeilAw Plat 03-0,67 755 T'he ch-cullifion system shoidd be at tar and iginbonined to encouragewaBdng, bilcyclixig a nd tr ansit ufflization as afterrvitivas to antonwiffle travell. linprov'ernents to existing IT'Slisit scmi(x Owuld be wtisidered, btluding provision, or additional tiawit stops ov, major wadwayera wid covemA bws.60ters ail ail existing and fidure slops, The diwe fppni ew,( aiang, ,the xo7iffieler of Spewffic- Man 03-067 desipates h,)Cvfionv for lransa, ,Ivqpx aypdshekevs, The Own?,al proingeev fhe 2ne ofg,01foarls. IvAgMan, INiths and.thuftlai ers, a means trqjic,W 4.3 OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Development on "duae' amas should, he enhanocdi�o accenwaithe Smic%, tar Sraphica I Mid cultival reso=es arte cats. Although no cimaw, qf tjpieal ehaw lerrit(foi7ri exisr wit/Orr the ewmInded a*edftc I'llan boundboy . , than landywpv concept de4guitex,the Ane ;xwrioiry qfSpeair fio Plan, 03,067,g2v as valuable resoum.- to bag ,terra grafed into the overaft inaster phin of developinent In efthe), land III Golf forin, onairs and topopwph vial rkwir. 77w Ckampionsh v ov in plawt viate (,,'oursev planoxdfir- wpmruction will molue Varied ovd,wg7,qficwo topography in, an enwirononentall)i i)avponsibts trianner, A) crepote draviativ seen " ravold"'?"Cay, Open spate sliould Ile defined to ffichtdc hillside an -as, alluvia) Nns:, water Coto-ses, golf cm,irse , and, natutal park, arefjs. Natural,, hupmved atul, unimptoved, typws ail' guest, space shoutd be imAWPAwithin tho defloition. Lvkes and efranwfk eanAs-capillgr 41M, t716, J&jn4j f vughv hj U' Speof,1lac Plan 03-0671wi&wqpe arckreuxur e4v plawned and will be AwpAgrared Wto the, owrall 1,041sler phyn grading Conce 'pl. As as link to the, City's oiltural ps4 tAwwats ofexisting citrus orchards,, date pahn, ST-o. ve% and fin, raring crew shouldbt preserve& Spev!I�c Plan 03-067 4411 ugh ze Me swooss of Me Rancho La Qub r(a landveape oonvxp� which PwaNhOwd Cirray "(31°oves ,, as as prinjaly Irma gbig Onionein, laids-cape architerture, Swi, dvr4�,, Dwe Pminis wit/ he w a.&&Tihe pri�zuvy veretcal mvemerat at Me erifty pstag, to the pi-qleci as, wellas wit` tit the howdeqw)-d trindscape theme, Pennitted Imid 'uses and MmW& for development, in opeu, spam and wMercowse areas should be id'vxdfird, Iww 03 067 Lz re d d S��scy�c P -, edfneateef in "action 3� Zan ing an Developinen? Regrdalbiv, aiv dhin th4v, docuatentfrw devOopcar rat in open opwx and water volur$e, 411006r, Spw,ific, Plwt 03-067 M 756 4.4, PARKAND RECRE.AXION ELEMENT Park md recrtudon use slio-uld be, locand in ptoximity U) residential uses to twilite )xAzsfrian a=ss and shoWd includc TAC mavor pkn fiar d�velqpnktnt within ",Vmcffilc P1,1an 03-06 7 has, as (7 jm-muzy fbcts, recreation elmenifiav"for gol I q rme hannix, andpaysive walking willfin Mm pr jec An inVgmtW bicycle ne"ork anal well ftcdodng joimtman pmh l sholfldbo pmoded Sewage effluent -JmAd, be uttlized for la qgc livf(ix., golf course, aefiverecreafion) areas and drought wlerant plant spmics s1hoWd be wed to reduce the bppacraa the potable wzw Supply of-th"C' cfty. When feasible, rar"Ye,"Ied, we'lle'r si'n"Irdes am WrId"Vionegi as, o of, irriga(iap) waler fior the a"eation almenis 0j, the Plarn area, 'Deoughl mi,011ani ptevtr roxwerial i� 41 stapIr ry"the Pak fte md(hh; the plan, ar m 4.5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION EIEMENT Scotdo conidors, viams and view sbods of tho S,aitta Rosa axial and Reef Mountains,. as wall U AeWl(0(W,9Td Lbe, San Gorgonio Pms, shoWd ba rgeserved and m1miced Utility rosources should be consvived. ublizing as Variety Of fmsiblc sftratejoes. Reqraleo-i wastewater will ht° utilized, of Plwi 03-067 ft,), supplemant irrigatim, rlenwnd.v once coorwrnicall)p aswilable io PnOthnizeusater consumption. Thc City should bi prot6cfed, fiorn tht adverse impacts, of ston" watrunoft including, pmparty damago as,well as wawr quality. The go,vicomse is apt repay with b4ains withftt dre corrithm to, pmWe ermn, water rplention durin? ,flom*n& Permitted land toses and standards foj- devolopmera in, open spne and wma,cxmTsc mvils shouldbe identified, Go1j' course ime fealures (he Imegration of watersIzed zamenv wrlk open space, aild a1v cipsigned V14111,01, Me camelors ft) provide morm water refention diring,flooding. "Me qualiLy and quantity ofgpoandwatr sbould, Iv pmaid and mdritainA Water conservatim effbas should bc meftitsiotd, expuided mid implemvilrd, Labs within ibe Alff cmaw bmazlip), pnwedefor srorago of �unq# f2k u.ve in irrigalOm 4,4, GpLcil - ic Plart 03-062' 757 4.6 INFRASIMUCTURE AND P'T.JBIAC SERNWESELEMENT Utility' regources should, bon mod ufilizing as variqy of feasible strmpsim wcruyx 'ode ,Ali so, 'S are bnift toCWyZxmhig C , mid tyre a rrfiorm, buile"fing c,rAo mimicirtis which implement as mayi oftonservarjon of �s � '7wees, eneig , a i , , , gy M) 0 o Adequate levels of law ei&rcement,, fire Carole that:, heafth. care mices &ad f=ilides should, be provided hirewmm, able 1,voAnty to tit Tesideots, Phe vwtftc Pion 03_067 prqject 0073triture'v to miqgare em"y perveived impact and pmvkky odditimil Yex.my,46; persymnel therthly, reducingg Me requked'man,powar.ftin Ike Cjjy�v 16w enybrcement SmViom T[wrecycling" redLictionareal reme of mmsto genmrwd ln Nix Cily should besuprxyrledby (lue, City., AJj'Nn,uCIzre.V, tarry e buift to �,71(y Zorini gond Developmem Code midibe unfforin building rode.slandurylk mohich implernenta s/miegy oftonver-station of cney& avd,resourves FreqUent rollwion of so1W waste mid adcqufste- disposal should beprov ided, to kmp the U�y alemi, and di.smise4rea, The Speolfiv F�rr'n (0-067 prqjeot ronwibzeeeto infii-ratructure fivem m, mlogate anY ,perceived hnjwd. 4.7 ENVIRONMENTALHAZARDSE LEMENT The stamim-ds for dcvelopmom sho,rdd be, carefully regal atod -to m4dinize stmauxW, image md In of life (groin earthquake.5), aven though tho City isloomW in a to intosity groluld- sbaking zone., Ail gtriviufr_s are built le.) Chy Zm1pg erred Devehymirnr Code aired ther umfoi-m builoing exx1a arandards Which implernart tz strategy qfeorm epiwf On (if energy and reamjmes�. The &velopmout of arrms located within IGG-ym Moor' lain boundaries andnot protected, by existing stom, merter Wilities should be ttdAres sed. All stmamv�y am bridt �a 0q, Zoning and Dewdopment ('(We Ond' the mpufrnw?, kiddimg wale smprdamlswhich implapimt a �mrutqgy of commrvation at cnerpy and Subsid,mm la, nards for thv, castern Pordon of the C'itV due to, its location Mthin a, region chATact eriy pert ental soil liq"factiori, duringr severe ground Omking shoWd be Teducod, ifPpOSSIbit, All sa,.140tmvOn,bud"ro70 ning and, Mo iaqi'o,r1ri 1w, "tea d co 0 ,slandardy 1Wyirh tart leear id as sirateg y of mrinyetudhm of emergy und msomm, ev. qVIecific A= 03-067 40,5 758 m Nc�se mi6gationAkuldbe, considered with. all development mar ailvial strv-,C& adjacvm arterkjls are requfredkv 00P rtraa,se MIX10d, has" hean prepared Jr developtnent adjircanf ic aileriuiw ayW, other, d'evelopmen"I''m req)Ored kv r1w, City qy"'P.'4 chiinfa Commm!; ity Developmeni L)cparhnent, 'M faclors that consrihLde to the, inereased msk of fire, hoard Ilculd be rediocto Protect La QW,mia Citizens mid stmourcs rmm ruedamge ,411 tr°tra.irar, s ara Built fi) CDO 2071il),g, ("Ode an d the Untf Pareliarilrlfrr uWestandards which implooriew a smoiegj,p of amserworvion qj" anergy, mid Plewonycov, 'Mostatlone tend mobile smirce, afaft quality impoots as, 'tiled %vith, new development should be ad'dresse(J. qPea 0C pujvd in myemotion wf th die povVious Man aruendment 001. Allperceived impacts, avvoakved with tha projoaproposal willbe uOrigaied to a tevel oy'in.Ogna1tranov. Pire Aj-)plicautthall urdizv bkiv sanii and diat control raw aosiars fn accordo'now Iv ith the A4ionic�,Iml Code awl the (frijIm-rn Buildingy, Cudeand'.vubjece to, the ap mil qf the Ci�y pir 40, analysis ofthe"Ah Quality hay been pPy.qmevd in cm�jzmivtioln with tho prytit arISS:Per ift Plan, rumendirrent 'j, ilrejmunv (m'V(x,,ia(6d with thisprojec(propaval witi be, At the (ime of VaNPIUMI of tentathm Plarl to Or Plate , "for W;)' loning approval the 'iPphcemtshall Amoonarate, thae adequare pmvisiew hat been matiefior uon-our omof(ve MCCUIS of IranspoHation ivifhin the project slit uy a MUM'S e.,f reduaing depeouience oti priwoe auimnobjkm 1iifs may PidwIv grog my path bicycle evul pyukortan dcvsdetns' and 01"hursimilur systolav jVj(jj 1he Sp pj,in L�vaatlc pivjeci deeigns Xiatl ancourage eho, use of pvNfa ercnsif bjop)vvdWgjbr bus stop ru required 0), the Community Davelf�pnzext Director mid consi0ent 1,400 the, require.ownts, of local tranot divricts and thee cy c Plan", 77w Appliemvil shafl encourtige anuppore Me', u,r,-e r,)f',S'oynhne Wm1bm sprvice and Dial -A -Ride betWeen'the 7XII Ormat) and prolpet slie, larat airpor4s Pal Speings, A Other regforuzi, Imut use's, Specific Fian 03-067 759 760 *:/:11:3 6 A.! GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS A. Land Use • Goal LU-1: Land use compatibility throughout the City. • Goal LU 2: High quality design that complements and enhances the City. • Policy LU 2.1: Changes and variations from the Zoning Ordinance in a Specific Plan will be offset by high quality design, amenities and mix of land uses. • Goal LU-5: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. • Policy LU-5.2: Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. • Goal LU-6: A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City"s residents and the region. • Policy LU-6.2: Maintain commercial development standards in the Zoning Ordinance including setbacks, height, pad elevations and other design and performance standards that assure a high quality of development. • Policy LU-6.3: Support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City"s economic base. Consistency: The site components (neighborhood commercial, low density residential, resort residential, resort hotel, resort amenities, recreational amenities, and open space) are compatible with surrounding residential, open space, and neighborhood commercial uses and designations. Lands to the north of the project and south of Avenue are designated Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential. Development of these lands would be governed by the City's zoning standards, and would consist of attached or detached single family residential developments (two to four units per acre for Low Density Residential), and medium density neighborhoods (four to eight units per acre). This development is expected to be consistent with and similar to the uses proposed within the project because the project proposes a maximum of 496 low density residential housing units on approximately 232.3 acres, as well as a maximum of 104 resort residential units, on approximately 40.5 acres, which would be similar to the density and intensity of development allowed under the General Plan. The project is separated from adjacent uses by surrounding arterial streets and physical topographic barriers, such as Coral Mountain. Off -site 761 development includes the connection to an existing Imperial Irrigation District (IID) substation to provide electricity to the project site. The off -site improvements would not impact land use of the off -site areas. The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan includes detailed design guidelines in Section 4 of the SP to guide high -quality development throughout the Specific Plan area. The project includes both neighborhood commercial and tourist commercial land uses which will generate revenue and create employment opportunities. The proposed project would increase services associated with tourism and neighborhood commercial uses. The project proposes housing of varying types and sizes with access to resort and recreational amenities, thus enhancing housing choices for potential buyers. Planning Areas II and III will offer a broad range of housing options on the site. Planning Area II, designated as Low Density Residential, anticipates detached or attached residential dwelling units with densities ranging from 0.8-4 dwelling units per acre. Planning Area III proposes the development of resort residential dwelling units with densities ranging from 2.5-2.8 dwelling units per acre. Consistent with Policy LU-5.2, Goal LU-6, and Policy LU-6.3, the implementation of the Tourist Commercial land use designation and the associated development of a recreational facility and hotel will promote the continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in La Quinta by providing resort, recreational, commercial, and residential land uses on the 386-acre property. Additionally, the residential uses will incrementally increase demand for commercial goods and services in the region, thus enhancing the economy. B. Circulation • Goal CIR-1: A transportation and circulation network that efficiently, safely and economically moves people, vehicles, and goods using facilities that meet the current demands and projected needs of the City. • Policy CIR-1.12: As a means of reducing vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City, the city shall pursue development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. • Goal CIR 2: A circulation system that promotes and enhances transit, alternative vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian networks. • Policy CIR-2.2: Encourage reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours of delay by increasing or encouraging the use of alternative modes and transportation technologies, 762 and implement and manage a hierarchy of Complete Street multimodal transportation infrastructure and programs to deliver improved mobility and reduce GHG emissions. • Policy CIR 2.3: Develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi -use paths and places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas with potential for increased pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart/NEV modes of travel. Consistency: The project proposes a private circulation system to provide safe and efficient passage for pedestrians and motorists throughout the site. The project proposes a multi -modal circulation system, aiming to decrease automobile dependency by providing transportation facilities for a variety of user groups including motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers of electric vehicles. The project proposes a private circulation system that will safely accommodate both vehicles and pedestrians with shared low -speed, low - volume internal streets. The multi -modal transportation system will consist of off-street bicycle and pedestrian paths/routes, sidewalks in higher traffic areas, enhanced pedestrian/bicycle crosswalks, pedestrian and multi -use paths and streets, traffic calming methods, short street segments with frequent caution zones and stopping points, golf cart and other alternative forms of personal transportation. C. Livable Community • Goal SC-1: A community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents. Consistency: The project includes elements to address the goal of the Livable Community Element, which is intended to assist the City in developing a more united community through resource conservation, built environment enhancement, promotion of alternative forms of transportation, and improvement of community health. The project and Specific Plan are consistent with this goal by promoting a high -quality mix of uses that will contribute to the built environment, promote walkability in the resort center of the project, and provide opportunities for active recreation. D. Economic Development • Goal ED-1: A balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. • Policy ED-1.1: The Land Use Element shall maintain a balance of land use designations to address economic needs, meet market demand, and assure a wide range of development opportunities. 763 • Goal ED 2: The continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in the City. Consistency: The project proposes a resort with up to 150 hotel keys, a water -based active recreation amenity, and resort residences that will expand tourism opportunities and promote fiscal stability. Additionally, the residential use will incrementally increase demand for commercial goods and services in the region, thus enhancing the economy. The project promotes the continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in La Quinta by providing resort, recreational, commercial, and residential land uses on the 386-acre property. E. Parks, Recreation and Trails • Goal PR-1: A comprehensive system of parks, and recreational facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. • Policy PR-1.4: The design and construction of parks and recreational facilities shall comply with all the development standards that apply to privately constructed facilities. • Policy PR-1.6: Encourage patterns of development that promote safe pedestrian and bicycle access to schools, public parks, and recreational areas. Consistency: The project designates areas set aside for recreational open space uses, as well as a water- based active recreational amenity that will provide recreational opportunities currently not available in the City. Additional open space will be scattered throughout PA II. Planning Area IV proposes approximately 23.6 acres of land zoned for Parks and Recreation (PR). This Planning Area will include active and passive recreational activities such as hiking trails, biking routes, and a ropes course/zipline. F. Housing • Goal H-1: Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. • Policy H-1.1: Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. • Goal H4: Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties. 764 • Goal H-6: Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. Consistency: The project proposes the development of up to 600 attached and detached dwelling units with densities ranging from 0.8-4 dwelling units per acre, thus contributing to the City's market rate housing stock. The project will complement the surrounding residential communities. Development of resort, neighborhood commercial, recreational open space, and residential uses will add value and amenities to neighboring communities and the City. The project promotes water conservation through the use of drought tolerant plant materials and water efficient irrigation techniques. The project will comply with all City and water district regulations and building codes for water conservation, energy efficiency, and building standards. The project will also comply with all applicable green building requirements. G. Water Resources Goal WR-1: The efficient use and conservation of the City's water resources. • Policy WR-1.1: Support the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses. • Policy WR-1.3: Support CVWD in its efforts to expand tertiary treated (i.e., reclaimed) water distribution. Consistency: The project promotes water conservation through the use of drought tolerant plant materials and water efficient irrigation techniques. The project will comply with all City and Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) regulations and building codes for water conservation. Additionally, recycled water will be used for common area irrigation for landscaping. The Wave Basin provides a recreational amenity to support the proposed resort and residential uses, and does so with substantially less water demand than required for alternatives amenities, such as an 18-hole golf course. H. Open Space and Conservation • Goals OS-1: Preservation, conservation and management of the City's open space lands and scenic resources for enhanced recreational, environmental, and economic purposes. • Policy OS-1.1: Identify and map lands suitable for preservation as passive and active open space. • Policy OS-1.2: Continue to develop a comprehensive multi purpose trails network to link open space areas. 765 Consistency: The project includes significant open space amenities, including the protection of Coral Mountain through an Environmentally Sensitive Area. The project incorporates connections to the public sidewalk and public trail system for convenient walking, jogging, and biking activities. Planning Area IV proposes approximately 23.6 acres of Open Space Recreation land uses, in which low -impact active and passive activities, such as hiking, biking and ropes courses are permitted. PA IV will be retained largely as natural desert land. The perimeter pedestrian improvements will connect to the surrounding community. However, the project will not connect to existing trails or open space areas, outside of the project boundary, because there are no existing public trails in the immediate vicinity of the project. I. Noise • Goal N-1: A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and resort character. • Policy N-1.1: Noise standards in the City shall be consistent with the Community Noise and Land Use Compatibility scale described in the Noise Element. • Policy N-1.2: New residential development located adjacent to any roadway identified in Table IV4 (in the Noise Element of the GP) as having a buildout noise level in excess of 65 d8A shall continue to be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. • Policy N-1.3: New non-residential development located adjacent to existing residential development, sensitive receptors or residentially designated land, shall be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates that it will not significantly impact the adjacent residential development or residential land. • Policy N-1.5: All noise impact analysis will include, at a minimum, short-term construction noise and noise generated by the daily operation of the project at build out. Consistency: The project establishes residential, resort residential, resort, recreational, and neighborhood commercial uses with compatible noise levels in an existing residential area. These uses maintain and enhance the City's residential and resort character and will be subject to the City's noise ordinance. Noise levels on Avenue 58 and Madison Street are not excessive due to the low traffic volumes, and the project will be buffered by a perimeter community wall. 766 FAM Q _z U CQ J WC C z C w:* Ow0 �- U U J z O Q W H H oQ z W u 0 �ULu LU H zWO~ W U N �Q z N 0 OJLU z ?� O 0 GG t- S-1. P ao P *:/:M1.36dC, CORAL MOUNTAI N RESORT SPECI FIC PLAN FEBRUARY 2022 Prepared for: THE CITY OF LA Q U I NTA, CALIFORNIA DESI G N AN D DEVELOP M ENT DEPARTM ENT MSA C'�' ",,,JSl lflII W",,4,G II 'J, 40 1 NNIIW 769 Table Of Contents Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................1 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................... 1.2 PURPOSE & INTENT ................................................ 1.3 PROJECT SETTING ................................................... 1.4 PROJECT HISTORY .................................................. 1.5 ENABLING LEGISLATION ......................................... 1.6 CEQA COMPLIANCE ................................................ 1.7 SUSTAINABILITY AND PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES 1.8 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ................................. 1.9 ENTITLEMENT PROCESS ......................................... 1.10 FUNDING AND FINANCING .................................... .1 .2 .3 .8 .8 .9 .9 10 14 15 CHAPTER 2: MASTER PLAN.........................................................................................16 2.1 LAND USE PLAN.................................................................................................... 16 2.1.1 Land Use Summary................................................................................ 16 2.1.2 Planning Area Descriptions................................................................... 19 2.2 PHASING PLAN..................................................................................................... 22 2.3 CIRCULATION PLAN..............................................................................................22 2.3.1 Vehicular Circulation.............................................................................23 2.3.2 Street Sections...................................................................................... 28 2.3.3 Non -Vehicular Circulation..................................................................... 29 2.3.4 Traffic Calming...................................................................................... 31 2.4 OPEN SPACE......................................................................................................... 33 2.5 SHEEP PROTECTION PLAN....................................................................................35 2.6 INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS.....................................................................................40 2.6.1 Water and Sewer Plan........................................................................... 40 2.6.2 Drainage Plan........................................................................................ 40 2.6.3 Off -Site Electrical Improvements ..........................................................41 CHAPTER 3: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS...........................................................47 3.1 PA-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL(CN)..........................................................47 3.1.1 Development Intent..............................................................................47 3.1.2 Allowable Uses......................................................................................47 3.1.3 Development Standards........................................................................ 48 i 770 Table Of Contents Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan 3.2 PA -II LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL(RL)..................................................................49 3.2.1 Development Intent..............................................................................49 3.2.2 Allowable Uses......................................................................................49 3.2.3 Development Standards........................................................................ 50 3.3 PA -III TOURIST COMMERCIAL(CT)....................................................................... 51 3.3.1 Development Intent..............................................................................51 3.3.2 Purpose and Intent................................................................................ 51 3.3.3 Allowable Uses......................................................................................52 3.3.4 Development Standards........................................................................ 54 3.4 PA -IV PARKS AND RECREATION (PR)................................................................... 57 3.4.1 Development Intent..............................................................................57 3.4.2 Allowable Uses......................................................................................57 3.4.3 Development Standards........................................................................ 58 CHAPTER 4: DESIGN GUIDELINES..........................................................................59 4.1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (PA-1) GUIDELINES ............................................ 60 4.1.1 Design Vision......................................................................................... 62 4.1.2 Materials............................................................................................... 63 4.2 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (PA-11) GUIDELINES .................................................. 64 4.2.1 Design Vision......................................................................................... 64 4.2.2 Materials............................................................................................... 66 4.2.3 Massing and Scale................................................................................. 66 4.2.4 Architecture.......................................................................................... 66 4.2.5 Outdoor Spaces..................................................................................... 69 4.2.6 Parking...................................................................................................70 4.3 TOURIST COMMERCIAL (PA -III) GUIDELINES....................................................... 71 4.3.1 Design Vision......................................................................................... 71 4.3.2 Elements................................................................................................72 4.3.3 Materials............................................................................................... 73 4.3.4 Building Material Vignettes................................................................... 76 4.3.5 Massing and Scale................................................................................. 77 4.3.6 Architecture.......................................................................................... 78 4.3.7 Outdoor Spaces..................................................................................... 84 4.3.8 Parking...................................................................................................86 ii 771 Table Of Contents Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan 4.4 LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES...................................................................................... 87 4.4.1 Landscape Elements.............................................................................. 87 4.4.2 Thematic Planting Zones....................................................................... 88 4.4.3 Plant Material Palette........................................................................... 96 CHAPTERS: PLAN ADMINISTRATION....................................................................99 5.1 IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................... 99 5.2 AMENDMENT.....................................................................................................100 5.3 INTERPRETATION............................................................................................... 101 5.4 ENFORCEMENT.................................................................................................. 101 CHAPTER 6: GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY......................................................103 6.1 LAND USE ELEMENT........................................................................................... 103 6.2 CIRCULATION ELEMENT.....................................................................................104 6.3 LIVEABLE COMMUNITY ELEMENT...................................................................... 105 6.4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT............................................................... 105 6.5 PARKS, RECREATION, AND TRAILS ELEMENT ..................................................... 105 6.6 HOUSING ELEMENT............................................................................................106 6.7 WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT...........................................................................106 6.8 OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT....................................................107 6.9 NOISE ELEMENT.................................................................................................107 iii 772 Table Of Contents Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan FIGURE LIST FIGURE 1: REGIONAL LOCATION MAP......................................................................................4 FIGURE 2: LOCAL VICINITY MAP...............................................................................................5 FIGURE 3: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH.............................................................................................6 FIGURE 4: EXISTING GENERAL PLAN MAP.................................................................................7 FIGURE 5: EXISTING ZONING MAP.........................................................................................11 FIGURE 6: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MAP...........................................................................12 FIGURE 7: PROPOSED ZONING MAP......................................................................................13 FIGURE 8: CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN..............................................................................18 FIGURE 9: VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN.............................................................................24 FIGURE 10A: TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS (OFF-SITE).................................................................25 FIGURE 106: TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS (ON-SITE)..................................................................26 FIGURE 10C: TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS (ON-SITE)..................................................................27 FIGURE 11: NON -VEHICULAR CIRCULATION..........................................................................32 FIGURE 12: CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN.........................................................................34 FIGURE 13: CONCEPTUAL PBS BARRIER PLAN........................................................................36 FIGURE 14: TYPICAL PBS CROSS SECTION...............................................................................37 FIGURE 15A: REPRESENTATIVE PBS FENCE PHOTOS..............................................................38 FIGURE 1513: REPRESENTATIVE PBS FENCE PHOTOS...............................................................39 FIGURE 16: CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN.................................................................................42 FIGURE 17: CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN..................................................................................43 FIGURE 18: CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN...........................................................................44 FIGURE 19: OFF -SITE ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS...............................................................45 FIGURE 20: CONCEPTUAL PHASING PLAN...............................................................................46 FIGURE 21: CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN..........................................................................90 FIGURE 22: PLANTING ZONES DIAGRAM................................................................................91 FIGURE 23: PLANTING ZONES DIAGRAM: REVEGETATION.....................................................92 FIGURE 24: PLANTING ZONES DIAGRAM: DESERT GARDEN...................................................93 FIGURE 25: PLANTING ZONES DIAGRAM: DESERT OASIS.......................................................94 FIGURE 26: PLANTING ZONES DIAGRAM: VILLAGE LANDSCAPE............................................95 iv 773 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 1 Introduction 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan ("Specific Plan," "SP", or "Project") is organized as follows: Section 1: Introduction. This Section provides an overview of the document, project setting and history, existing approvals, legislative authority for the specific plan process, the method of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the existing and proposed land use designations for the area, and the proposed entitlements to implement the Specific Plan. Section 2: Master Plan. This Section describes the primary development plan components required for orderly development of the project. These include land use, circulation, open space, infrastructure plans, and characteristics of designated planning areas. Section 3: Development Standards. This Section establishes the development standards applicable to land within the Specific Plan boundary. Development regulations are presented for each Planning Area. Section 4: Design Guidelines. This Section outlines the broad design approaches and themes intended to guide the visual appearance of future development for each planning area. Section 5: Plan Adminstration. This section describes the various processes and procedures used to administer and implement the adopted Specific Plan. Section 6: General Plan Consistency. This Section evaluates the consistency of the Specific Plan with the City of La Quinta General Plan and relevent General Plan Goals and Policies. 1 774 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT The Specific Plan presented herein is a comprehensive planning and development document intended to guide development of lands within the Specific Plan area boundary. This document establishes development plans, guidelines, and regulations for the project plan area and specifies development criteria for various uses permitted within the plan area. This document is intended to ensure a high quality of development consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of La Quinta General Plan and the development goals of the property owner. These include: To implement a plan that recognizes and responds to the natural and aesthetic character of the property. To create a private resort community with a variety of interrelated and mutually supportive commercial and recreational land uses that will also generate transient occupancy and sales tax revenues in order to enhance the City's economic base and long-term financial stability. To promote walkability and non -motorized connectivity as an integral part of the project design, including (1) establishing residential neighborhoods that are linked through multi -use trails that connect neighborhoods throughout the project; and (2) providing "walk streets" in the Resort area to provide internal connection between facilities within the Resort and the Wave Basin. Establish a density hierarchy that situates the highest density development within the resort and gradually reduces density as you move awayfrom the resort into the surrounding residential neighborhoods, while maintaining the overall density previously included for this property in the Andalusia Specific Plan. Provide a variety of open space and recreational uses (active and passive). Design a planned community that complements existing development in the surrounding area and is compatible with the surrounding environment. Develop a high -quality private wave basin (The Wave) that provides unique recreational opportunities for future residents of the project, and that attracts resort guests and creates a landmark facility that will enhance the City's reputation as the "Gem of the Desert". The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan replaces Specific Plan 03-067 for lands west of Madison Street, and establishes new standards for development within the project boundary including a degree of flexibility to respond to market -driven demand changes. 2 775 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 1.3 PROJECT SETTING The Specific Plan area is located approximately 130 miles from the City of Los Angeles and the Pacific coast, approximately 250 miles from the City of Las Vegas, and approximately 250 miles from the Phoenix/Scottsdale metropolitan region. As shown on Figure 1, Regional Location Map, the Specific Plan area is situated in the easterly portion of the Coachella Valley within the corporate limits of the City of La Quinta, Riverside County. The project is accessible from Interstate 10 by way of Monroe Street with immediate access to Avenue 58 to the North, as shown in Figure 2, Local Vicinity Map and Figure 3, Aerial Photograph. Consisting of approximately 386 acres, the Specific Plan area is generally defined by Avenue 58 along the northerly boundary, Madison Street to the east, Avenue 60 to the south, and vacant land and portions of the flood control dike to the west. In its existing setting, the project property is currently undeveloped. Surrounding land uses are listed in Table 1, Existing and Surrounding Uses, and shown in Figure 4, Existing General Plan Map. TABLE 1: EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES Jurisdiction General Plan Zoning Existing Use Project La Quinta GC/LDR/OS-R RL/CN/GC Vacant Avenue 58, Vacant Land, Single North La Quinta LDR/MHDR/OS-R RL/RMH/GC Family Residences, Golf Course South La Quinta LDR/OS-N RL / OS Avenue 60, Single Family Residences, Natural Open Space East La Quinta LDR/GC/OS-R RL/CN/GC Madison Street, Single Family Residences, Golf Course, Vacant land West La Quinta OS-N OS Natural Open Space General Plan Designations: LDR - Low Density Residential / MHDR -Medium High Density Residential / OS-R - Open Space - Recreation/ OS-N - Open Space - Natural / GC- General Commercial Zoning Designations: RL - Low Density Residential / RMH - Medium High Density Residential / GC - Golf Course / CN - Neighborhood Commercial / OS - Open Space 776 3 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN r r6' �%°� ! - A ! / fY rul kr n 71, �r/r'" /%, �i /I R�"9alrlf r Rviu � r lY ri 10 rtiri IUr", 0 1 1 a l i w ra ral l� J N r /! /OR Rl r liil�i f!d; �""✓r�r""r/ll selp y `rr/ "�✓,' rtl r l l r" f/ N r �,� I flJ '„Y /� / uY / �4f " a jr u 6� l rl / / / e 1 i ` i n - �4 �f / "j J/ �� r r"` rllb �11pr u"M�'W r»ra'/�!! f/TA JX r�� �,,,fr "Jlrja / rein Y '" ,rll l �l 9 r V fr awl �% r-r j lrlrr" / fin " �r « v I� r 1/ l�ri�ro%1�/� r ir�r/n.Y ff3i W Aar l� lfi r ( 01 iL V 1Y r" ri�it� f �1 SP RINGS 4 b„r / ��r,I4W r Ir �,al r CITYw V fi JIB 1/ N M ri`ryi �1 !/lro/ U r / y a �I r� Y ,I A Aa 4 aA,r r aflyd � /�� r /� a r✓;' r ! f� a � G a al9 �J�11 i/� Y �,� o�yuN74ywyF�M1rr�° lr ra I�bYp/l!/Yflaa f o%YIIu�AI� PALM ✓'��' ��rs�¢r �� Y "�" ` 11 ern ✓ r r i/ ry7 t' � I afPf /yr l�(iVIO�' / Y 7 INOto y �pl,r✓ yP R, alY ,w uµ1 VI` COACKMA i a '!WI100 o g �JDr da -- A � rr� e ✓? ' '/�' / i 1JJ! G r; /, o%'ru ,6 "/YlfSsavr i1 �oG/f �yll as y!/ r r OF ti`' V'aJ vA I I'll if p % ri�ro l alb � J/f r/ 1 Prr it e, r,. jq, / / /, r ✓ I/ % r'i /��f a Ie a a 410 �" I �r yDf ai 9 r iUy Ia rra �� f 9! 141 �( r a,'y' �i %rah`' fJlai� a.N°1 ✓r°(Ir ll'I�iA NO goom ,'s yr 6 « ra" J/r r f, f / fr II�>01 %a r/h r r �O IAi Ya I Ol✓Ir/9 f a ri 'r a✓ r �rji r»�fiaa //rr fry r �! /r✓iI l/ r✓rerr��9i/r�Ir C/rUi�/ ®1p✓ia l/ l(l '.. �i/N r// ��fl/JN rry✓o ��y 1 d� �/ P✓1 grva r Of Ifof/'�j" r / ✓!` �� ,llf G%rr i< rllrflr i / Nr`f � l N e I � ' r !' .dle Y r i f ' �irl ' n v Nd�asY/ N.T.S. Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 REGIONAL LOCATION MAP MSA';':il I ;U I !G, .�. 41 -PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERING -LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM FIGURE 1 PAGE 4 777 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 I@ MSA M SU f 11 JG, = ... 'PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERING BLAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2 PAGE 5 778 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 I@ MSA M SU f 11 JG, = ... 'PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERINC BLAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FIGURE 3 PAGE 6 779 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: Project undary Low Density Residential Medium/High Density Residential General Commercial Open Space - Natural Open Space - Recreation Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. I@ 'PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERINC BLAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM - .tea= ------- Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE FIGURE 4 PAGE 7 780 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 1.4 PROJECT HISTORY This property was originally part of the larger "Rancho La Quinta Specific Plan" approved in 1988 while part of unincorporated Riverside County. The Specific Plan area was later annexed to the City of La Quinta. The area south of Avenue 58 and north of Avenue 60 became known as the "Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan 03-067" and included areas east and west of Madison Street. The eastern half was eventually developed with the Andalusia Country Club while the western half remained vacant. Approval of this Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan will establish a new master plan and development standards for the property west of Madison Street to allow creation of a boutique resort and master -planned community. Concurrently, Amendment 5 of Specific Plan 03-067 is being processed to remove the western half such that only the Andalusia Country Club east of Madison Street will remain. This will create two separate and distinct communities, "Coral Mountain Resort", west of Madison Street and "Andalusia Country Club" east of Madison Street 1.5 ENABLING LEGISLATION The authority to prepare, adopt, and implement the Specific Plan is granted to the City of La Quinta by the California Government Code §65450 - 65457.). The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing before it can recommend to the City Council the adoption of a Specific Plan or an amendment thereto. The City Council may adopt a Specific Plan and/or an amendment to the Specific Plan by either ordinance or resolution. This Specific Plan is a regulatory document that, once adopted, will serve as the Zoning Code for the plan area. Upon completion of the Specific Plan adoption process, future development must be consistent with the Specific Plan and amendments thereto. 781 8 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 1.6 CEQA COMPLIANCE The project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the project in conformance with CEQA guidelines. The EIR evaluated potential environmental impacts associated with the development as described in this Specific Plan and included mitigation measures to reduce those impacts wherever possible. The mitigation measures will be applied to all applicable components of the project as it is developed. 1.7 Sustainability and Project Design Features The Project will be designed with sustainability features to reduce Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) and promote energy efficiency project -wide. Such features include but are not limited to, pedestrian connections and interconnectivity, implementation of ride share programs, drought -tolerant landscaping, and use of photovoltaic systems. These Project Design Features (PDFs) are described below: • Use of Pedestrian connections to promote access, interconnectivity, and vehicle trip reduction. • Variety of proposed land uses and amenities within the Project to promote vehicle trip and emission reductions. • Implementation of ride sharing programs (including designated ride -share vehicle parking) and employer -sponsored shuttle services to reduce commute trips. • Compliance with Title 24 standards for residential and non-residential buildings. • Use of drought -tolerant plants in landscape design. • Use of energy efficient lighting. • Use of photovoltaic (PV) systems 782 9 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 1.8 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING The La Quinta General Plan (2035), establishes the City's policy relative to the planned future pattern, intensity, density, and relationships of land uses in the City and the various infrastructure systems needed to effectively support those land uses. The Specific Plan implements the City's General Plan by bringing detailed policies and regulations together into a focused development plan for the Specific Plan area. It serves as a link between the General Plan and subsequent development proposals within the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan is regulatory document which, when adopted by the La Quinta City Council, governs all facets of project development including the distribution of land uses, location and sizing of supporting infrastructure, as well as development standards and regulations. Per the La Quinta General Plan Land Use Map, the land use designations for the site are General Commercial, Low Density Residential, and Open Space - Recreation. Figure 4, Existing General Plan Map, displays the General Plan Land Use designations in effect when this Specific Plan was proposed. Zoning implements the General Plan land use by applying appropriate development standards for allowable uses, minimum lot size, yard setbacks and similar development considerations. Figure 5, Existing Zoning Map, displays the zoning designations for the site at the time this Specific Plan was proposed: Low Density Residential (RL), Neighborhood Commercial (CN), and Golf Course (GC). General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments were processed as part of the project entitlements to establish Specific Plan consistency with these regulatory documents. The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map designations are illustrated in Figure 6, Proposed General Plan Map, and Figure 7, Proposed Zoning Map. 783 10 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. I@ 'PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERINC BLAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 EXISTING ZONING FIGURE 5 PAGE]] 784 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN s Legend: �, ,, Project Boundary Neighborhood Commercial .AVENUE 58 Low Density Residential Tourist Commercial Open Space (Recreation) Source: MSA Consulting, Inc 0 MSA M U� "I I J G,�. > PLANNI NG>CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE FIGURE 6 PAGE 12 785 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: Project Boundary Low Density Residential (RL) Tourist Commercial (CT) Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Parks and Recreation (PR) Source: MSA Consulting, Inc 0 MSA M U� "I I J G,�. ,PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM h /A,, AVENUE 58 PROPOSED ZONING FIGURE 7 PAGE 13 786 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 1.9 ENTITLEMENT PROCESS Approval of the following entitlements will implement this project: General Plan Amendment (GPA) - The GPA will amend the current General Plan land use designations to General Commercial, Low Density Residential, Open Space - Recreation, and Tourist Commercial. The GPA requires public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council. Zone Change (ZC) - The ZC will change the existing zoning of the Specific Plan area to Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Parks and Recreation, and Tourist Commercial. The ZC requires public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council. Specific Plan (SP) - The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan will be adopted as the master plan governing the allowable land uses, development standards and design guidelines for the project. The SP requires public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council. Tentative Tract Map (TTM) - TTMs are intended to implement the project and subdivide the property into smaller lots for development. TTMs may be filed with each phase of development as necessary. Each TTM will require review by the Commission. Site Development Permit (SDP): SDPs are required by the City for approval of site- specific landscape design, architectural design, and site plans. Individual SDP's may be required for each phase of development. These may be processed concurrent with or subsequent to other entitlement approvals. Each SDP will require public hearings before the Commission. Conditional Use Permits (CUP): As provided in Section 3 of this document, uses that require a CUP under the City's Zoning Ordinance shall be processed in accordance with Section 9.210.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Temporary Use Permit (TUP): TUPs are required by the City to accommodate special, unique, and limited duration activities that might otherwise be outside the provisions of normal zoning. Temporary uses are expected on a limited basis by this Specific Plan as discussed in Section 2.1. TUPs are reviewed administratively by the Design and Development Director. Development Agreement (DA): The DA would vest the applicant's right to develop the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan area pursuant to the entitlements described above, address short-term rentals within the project, provide assurances to the City that the project will have a net positive fiscal impact on the City, ensure the timely completion of 14 787 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN infrastructure to serve the project and surrounding area, and ensure that the project design features and mitigation measures are enforceable project requirements. 1.10 FUNDING AND FINANCING The Coral Mountain Specific Plan will be developed using private funds. 788 15 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 2 Master Plan 2.1 LAND USE PLAN The Specific Plan will facilitate development of a boutique resort and planned residential community. The project will contain a variety of resort facilities, residential units and amenities, featuring an artificial wave basin as the focal point for the community. The Land Use Plan, as shown in Figure 8 and detailed in Table 2, Conceptual Land Use Summary, proposes 600 residential units and up to 150 hotel keys, distributed within approximately 386 acres. These buildings are arranged in configurations which may include estate compounds, single-family detached units, townhome-styled units and/or stacked flats of two, four, and six units each. Additionally, a neighborhood commercial area is planned at the southwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58. 2.1.1 Land Use Summary The development plan for the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan includes: Necessary infrastructure to assure adequate facilities and services; 60,000 sf of neighborhood commercial uses on 7.7 acres located at the corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street; A resort community on approximately 121 acres including a hotel with up to a 150 keys, 104 resort residential units and 57,000 sf of complementary resort -serving commercial and recreational uses and amenities and a recreational surf wave basin with operational, administrative and maintenance equipment/facilities. Up to 496 residential units with an average densitiy of up to 4 units per acre, ownership options and product types along with compatible recreational amenities, such as golf, on approximately 232 acres. 789 16 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE 2: CONCEPTUAL LAND USE SUMMARY Non - Planning Land Use Gross Land Residential Max. Dwelling Max. Hotel/Resort Area Category Area (Acres) Building (SF) Units (DU) Units (DU) PA I GC 7.7 60,0001 IF PA II LDR 232.3 IF 496 PA 111 TC 120.8 002 IF 104 150 PA IV OS-R 23.6 TOTAL 384.4 a=11 117,000 _]L_600 150 Key: GC = General Commercial, LDR = Low Density Residential, TC = Tourist Commercial, OS-R = Open Space - Recreation Notes: 1. Consisting of retail commercial uses available to the general public. 2. Consisting of private resort -serving uses available to residents, members and guests. 3. Excluding 1.5 acres dedicated to perimeter public ROW. 17 790 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: Project Boundary Planning Area Boundary — — — — Planning Area Sub -Boundary Neighborhood Commercial Low Density Residential Resort Open Space (Recreation) Source: MSA Consulting, Inc 0 MSA M U� "I I J G,�. > PLANNI NG>CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM h p i„ AVENUE 58 PA II ■■ter„■ ■■., I i do a'I 1.VENUE 60 N.T.S. Exhibit Date: November 4, 2027 CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN FIGURE 8 PAGE 18 791 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 2.1.2 Planning Area Descriptions The Specific Plan is broken into four Planning Areas, each corresponding with a basic land use component. Planning Area I (PA-1) - Neighborhood Commercial PA I consists of approximately 7.7 acres of land and will allow for up to 60,000 sf of publicly accessible neighborhood commercial building space. Retail development is proposed at the southwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58 and will consist of a mixture of neighborhood commercial and resort -related commercial development. Allowable uses are discussed in Chapter 3. Planning Area II (PA-11) - Residential PA -II consists of approximately 232 acres of land and will allow for the construction of up to 496 single family attached and detached dwellings and affiliated amenities. Residential neighborhoods of various types occur throughout the project. Product types may include estate compounds, single-family detached/attached units, alley loaded homes, and clustered products so long as the overall number of allowable units within the PA is not exceeded. This would mean that if denser housing products are used, a larger percentage of the planning area would be retained in open space. Ownership and occupancy of these units may include primary, secondary and fractional ownership along with short term vacation rentals. Planning Area III (PA -III)- Resort PA -III consists of approximately 121 acres of land and allows for construction of a mixed - use private resort including a surf wave basin, a boutique hotel, a walkable residential village, an entertainment and fitness complex, and a private community clubhouse. The resort will contain 150 hotel keys, 104 residential units, and 57,000 square feet of resort - serving commercial and recreational building space, outdoor amenities and a community clubhouse. For descriptive purposes, the resort is further divided into seven planning subareas as noted below. PA-111(A) Resort Hotel The Resort Hotel subarea contains approximately 8.5 acres and will accommodate a boutique resort hotel with up to 150 keys along with customary resort amenities. The Resort Hotel will provide a hospitality component with relaxed surf -village feel. Amenities may include a restaurant and bar, retail space, meeting space, swimming pool, fitness center, spa and lodging. Lodging options will provide a range of traditional hotel rooms, suites, and casitas. 792 19 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN PA-111(B) The Wave The Wave subarea contains approximatly 31.2 acres containing an artificial surf wave basin that will function as the focal amenity for the community. "The Wave" basin will feature state of the art proprietary technology designed to re-create ocean waves for recreational surfing by individual resort residents, members and guests as well as the hosting of limited private and public events by reservation. Like other major recreational amenities, the Wave requires ancillary operational, administrative and maintenance functions for basin operations that are located and further described in PAIII-G. The Wave basin operates under ambient temperatures and does not require heating. PA -lll (C) Wave Club The Wave Club subarea contains approximatley 3.2 acres fronting the wave basin and will function as a private clubhouse with amenities for exclusive use by the Coral Mountain Resort community. Representative amenities at the "Wave Club" may feature changing rooms, surfboard storage, pool, and a casual dining / lounge area. PA-111(D), PA-111(E) Resort Residential West & East These Planning subareas contain approximately 40.5 acres and are planned as a grid - patterned village that flanks the hotel and resort amenities. Structures will consist of 104 residential units designed on a compact gridlike network of streets and pathways. The majority of the Resort Residential neighborhoods are located within a 1,200' walking radius of the Hotel, Wave Basin, Wave Club, and Farm (see description below) to concentrate density within easy walking distance of the key resort amenities. Residents are encouraged to walk or use alternate forms of transportation such as golf -carts, bikes, scooters, and skateboards to access the hotel or resort amenities to promote a pedestrian friendly community that reduces reliance on automobiles. The 104 units will be allowed to participate in a resort rental program through the hotel. PA-111(F) The Farm The Farm contains approximately 11 acres of land for construction of private resort - serving entertainment facilities and amenities. It will offer a wide range of community and active lifestyle amenities such as golf, golf practice and training facilities, hiking, biking, bicycle pump -track, raquet sports, fitness and swimming pool areas. In addition, spa and dining facilities may be provided within the Farm for residents and hotel guests so that, upon arrival, everything is available for a full resort experience with no reason to leave the resort grounds. 793 20 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN PA -Ill G Back of House The Back of House subarea contains approximately 26.5 acres that will be graded as level, largely open, land south of the wave basin. This subarea will provide flexible gathering and staging space for temporary equipment such as port -a -potties, shade structures, tenting for inclement weather, and catering equipment that might be used during temporary events. It will also house up to 12,000 square feet of necessary permanent support facilities for maintenance, service and administrative operation of the wave basin and resort including employee parking (estimated at about 18 spaces based on existing operations at the Lemoore Surf Ranch, a comparable wave basin.) The back of house subarea will also be used to host public ticketed events on the wave basin. These events may occur up to 4 times per year and are restricted to 4 days duration with a maximum of2,500 guests per day. Planning Area IV (PA -IV)- Open Space PA -IV contains approximately 24 acres of natural open space that may also be used for low -impact active and passive recreation activities, such as hiking, biking and ropes courses. This Planning Area will be maintained largely in anatural desert landscape to complement the rugged beauty of Coral Mountain, the visual backdrop forthe wave basin. 21 794 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 2.2 PHASING PLAN The Project is designed for construction in eight (8) primary development phases with build out over approximately 4-6 years. Each primary development phase may be broken into subphases in response to market conditions and consumer demand. For example, the hotel of up to 150 keys may be constructed in multiple subphases. Similarly, the resort and retail commericial areas may be built at different times as demand dictates. Construction of Phase 1 is estimated to begin in 2021 with full buildout estimated to be complete by 2026 subject to market conditions. Figure 20, Conceptual Phasing Plan reflects the anticipated construction sequence and may be non -sequential and adjusted subject to market conditions (so long as necessary utilities and access points are provided). Phased development will be accompanied by the orderly extension of circulation and parking facilities, public utilities, and infrastructure in accordance with the final conditions of approval for the project and the City Engineering Services Division. Phasing is conceptual and subject to refinement with final engineering design and changes in sequence in response to market conditions 2.3 CIRCULATION PLAN Vehicle and pedestrian circulation systems are an important component of every development project. This Specific Plan is designed to promote alternative forms of transportation while still providing for vehicular access through a roadway network that interconnects all land uses within the Project. The following sections provide an overview of the circulation system proposed for the Project. This Specific Plan takes a multi -modal approach to circulation system planning within the Project. This design seeks to decrease automobile dependency by providing transportation facilities for a variety of user groups including motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers of electric vehicles. With this goal in mind, the backbone system of circulating roadways throughout the Specific Plan with multiple access points will serve as vehicular and multi -use transportation routes for residents and visitors. Convenient access and parking is planned in close proximity to retail and resort areas for visitors. The internal system of private local roadways will allow residents of individual neighborhoods to access all Planning Areas internally without exiting onto surrounding public streets. The following are characteristic features accommodated within the project's multi -modal transportation system consisting of walk streets, sidewalks, multi- use trails and shared use low -speed, low -volume roadways: Off-street bicycle and pedestrian paths/routes; 22 795 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Sidewalks in higher traffic areas; Enhanced pedestrian/bicycle crosswalks; Pedestrian and multi -use paths and streets; Traffic calming methods; Short street segments with frequent caution zones and stopping points; Golf cart and other alternative forms of personal transportation 2.3.1 Vehicular Circulation The ability to move easily from one area of the Project to another using multiple modes of transportation is a key organizing principle of this Specific Plan. As illustrated on Figure 9, Vehicular Circulation Plan, the interior street system envisioned for the Project is an internal system of private streets linking all neighborhoods to provide open circulation. The Entry Drive, leading from the Project entry off of Madison Street to the resort area in Planning Area III, is intended to create a sense of place. Local Roads branch off the primary entry drive, linking residential and resort residential areas to the main street. Resort Drives are open to the guests and residents of the community and convey vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles throughout the Resort. Asecondary entrance is provided from Avenue 60. The Community is bordered on the north and east sides by public streets designated as Secondary Arterials in the City of La Quinta General Plan 2035 and on the south by a segment of Avenue 60, which is designated as a Collector Road The Specific Plan's circulation system contains a network of access points and streets arranged according to the function, character, and location of each intersection and roadway. The Specific Plan provides access to the Neighborhood Commercial in Planning Area 1 with a primary public entry from Madison Street and two public entries from Avenue 58. An internal access from the project Entry Drive is also provided. Entries to residential neighborhoods will be provided from the primary entry drive and their conceptual locations are illustrated in Figure 9, Vehicular Circulation Plan. Brief descriptions of each street classification are illustrated in Figures 10 A-10C Typical Road Sections. Image Corridor Standards for the Specific Plan Area Development adjacent to City of La Quinta General Planned Image Corridors located on Avenue 60, Madison Street, and Avenue 58 shall be restricted to a height limitation of 22' from pad grade within 150' of the right-of-way. Rear and side yard setbacks for lots adjacent to the Image Corridors shall be expanded to a minimum of 25' per La Quinta Municipal Zoning Code Section 9.50.020. 796 23 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: Project Boundary Conceptual Residential Entry Point Conceptual Residential Gated Entry Point 24' Right of Way: Entry Drive 24' Right of Way: Local Road "A" 24' Right of Way: Resort Drive 26' Right of Way: Resort / Commercial Drive 28' Right of Way: Entry Drive 32' Right of Way: Resort / Commercial Drive 40' Right of Way: Entry Drive 40' Right of Way: Resort Drive 60' Right of Way: Resort Drive Ce Pn Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. 0 MSA M SU "I' I I J G,�. > PLANNI NG>CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN PROP. 99' R/W 44' 55' ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE ±20' ±69' (EX. IMPROVEMENTS) EX. E/P 30' (PROP. IMPROVEMENTS) 10. EASEMENT EX. LANDSCAPE PARKWAY 112' ±6' ±12' ±12' ±12' ±12' 12' 6' VARIES 12' EX. EX. TRAVEL LANE EX. TRAVEL LANE EX. PAINTED EX. TRAVEL LANE PROP. PROP. PROP. SHOU- MEDAN EX. TRAVEL LANE I SHOU- MEANDERING LDER A,C. LDER SIDEWALK PAVEMENT OVER A.B. - - - r/////r� > ... :" ....:::.:" . ".........." . ""." " .:: " .".. CURB PROP. CURB 8 AVENUE S8 GUTTER GUTTER (SECONDARY ARTERIAL / PUBLIC ROAD) N.T.S. EX.PROJECT BOUNDARY & EX. EX. R/W 110' (EXISTING R/W) R/W ADDITIONAL 55' 55' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 10' ±12' ±43' ±43' (BY OTHERS) ±12• ±13' +13' +18' +13' +13' *8' ±8' ±4' PROP. EX. IMP SHOULDER EX.TRAVELLANE EX.TRAVELLANE EX. RAISED MEDIAN EX.TRAVELLANE EX.TRAVELLANE EX. H SHOULDER ±4• ±8 , ;� ,� " Irr�.,,� , i PROP. 6'MEANDERING SIDEWALK EX. MEANDERING SIDEWALK GUTTER RB & EX. BARRIER CURB (SECONDARY MADISON STREET EX. BARRIER CURB ARTERIAL / PUBLIC ROAD) EX. CURB & GUTTER N.T.S. PROP.,""""""......,,FUTURE R/W 80' (ULTIMATE R/W) R/W ADDITIONAL 40' 40' (BY OTHERS) LEA ANDSCAPEM NTE 10' 15' 25' 25' (BY OTHERS) 15' T 8' 8' 11' 12' 11' B' 8' T SIDEWALK SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE PAINTED MEDIAN TRAVELLANE BIKE LANE GUTTER AVENUE 6U GUTTER (COLLECTOR / PUBLIC ROAD) N.T.S. Source: MSA Consulting, Inc I@ MSA M SU 11 UJG, = ... ,PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERINC BLAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS (OFF -SITE) FIGURE 10A PAGE 25 798 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN PEDESTRIAN PROP. PROP. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 80' R/W 40' R/W 80' EASEMENT VARIES 5' VARIES 10, 20' 20' 10, 20' P.U.E. TRAVEL LANE I TRAVEL LANE P.U.E. PROP. MEANDERING PATH PROP.1' DRAINAGE SWALE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 88' VARIES 5' VARIES PROP. MEANDERING PATH PROP. V- DRAINAGE SWALE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 86' VARIES , 5' VARIES PROP. MEANDERING PATH PROP.1' DRAINAGE SWALE P.U.E. & PEDESTRIAN PROP. EASEMENT _ R/W 2' A.C. PAVEMENT 2' OVER A.B. I III=11 I=11 I=11 I=11 I=11 I=11 I=11 I=11 I=11 I=11 I=11 I=1 I ENTRY DRIVE I=1 I I=111= 11= N.T.S. PROP. PROP. R/W 24' R/W 1 10, 12' 12' 10, P.U.E. TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE P.U.E. 2' A.C. PAVEMENT 2 OVER A.B. =15011III=1- -III VALLEY I I=1 I I=1 I I-III=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I III III=1 ENTRY DRIVE VALLEY GUTTER N.T.S. GUTTER PROP. PROP. R/W 28' R/W 10, 14' 14' 10, P.U.E. TRAVEL LANE I TRAVEL LANE P.U.E. 2A.C. PAVEMENT 2' I` OVER A.B. PROP 2 VALLEY J ENTRY DRIVE PROP.12 VALLEY GUTTER N.T.S. GUTTER VALLEY GUTTER ..._... _.........---....LE PEDESTRIAN 88' EASEMENT VARIES PROP. V DRAINAGE SWALE PEDESTRIAN 86' EASEMENT VARIES I PROP. 1' DRAINAGE SWALE P.U.E. & PROP. PEDESTRIAN R/W EASEMENT (COMMERCIAL) 5' S' 18, 24' 18, 5' 5' 15' ANGLED PARKING TRAVEL LANES ANGLED PARKING SETBACK A.C. r A.C. PAVEMENT I OVER A.B. I = (HOTEL) PROP. SIDEWALKS PROP. 2' VALLEY- L_ PROP. 2' VALLEY GUTTER PROP. SIDEWALK GUTTER RESORT DRIVE GUTTER N.T.S. P.U.E. & P.U.E. & PEDESTRIAN PROP. PROP. PEDESTRIAN EASE11 MENT 10, R/W 40' R/W 10' EASEMENT 24' VARIES 5' 5' 8' 12' 12' 8' 5' S' VARIES SETBACK LANDSCAPE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE PARKING SETBACK 2' A.C. PAVEMENT 2' I" r OVER A.B. PROIP. ISIIDEIWIALIK --I II II II 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 III II II1-1 I -PROP. SIDEWALK PROP. 2' VALLEY GUTTER RESORT DRIVE PROP. 2' VALLEY GUTTER N.T.S. Note: Street sections may be refined or adjusted if approved by the City Public Works Director. Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS (ON -SITE) ,PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERINC D SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM FIGURE 10B PAGE 26 799 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN P.U.E. & P.U.E. & PEDESTRIAN PROP, PROP. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTID' R/W 26' R/W 10' EASEMENT VARIES 1 5' , 5' 1 13' j 13' 5' 5' VARIES ETBACK TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE SETBAC 2 I� A.C. PAVEMENT - 12 I r OVER A.B. I ROPII III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III PROP. SIDEWALKIII PROP. VALLEY 11 RESORT / PIISIDEWALK P IROP121 PROP. VALLEY GUTTER COMMERCIAL DRIVE GUTTER N.T.S. P.U.E. & P.U.E. & PEDESTRIAN PROP. PROP. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTID' R/W 32' R/W 10,EASEMENT VARIES 5' , 5' 24 8' 5' , 51 VARIES 12' % 12' ETBACK TRAVEL LANE I TRAVEL LANE *PARKING SETBAC 21.E A.C. PAVEMENT- 12 r I OVER A.B. I l� III III ,., III III III III ii �7 — m ii III Ili — 1=1 I� 11=111=111-111 111=11 1=T1(=T PROP. SIDEWALK PROP. 2' PROP 2' PROP. SIDEWALK VALLEY RESORT / VALLEY GUTTER GUTTER COMMERCIAL DRIVE N.T.S. *Note: Parking Only Occurs on One Side of Travel Lane but may Alternate from Side to Side. See Detail "A" on Sheet 2 of 2 of the Tentative Tract Map. P.U.E. & P.U.E. & PEDESTRIAN PROP, PROP. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT,n, R/W R/W n-EASEMENT VARIES 5' 5' 12' 12' VARIES SETBACK TRAVEL LANE FTRAVIELLANE SETBACK 2 I I OVER p gEMENT-12 PROP. SIDEWALK I L PROP. 2' PROP. 2' VALLEY J LOCAL ROAD "A" VALLEY GUTTER GUTTER N.T.S. P.U.E. & P.U.E. & PEDESTRIAN PROP. PROP. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT , R/W R/W — EASEMENT VARIES 12' 12' VARIES SETBACK TRAVELLANETRAVEL LANE SETBACK 2 I OVER p BEMENT�2 PROP. 2'—J RESORT DRIVE PROP. 2' VALLEY VALLEY GUTTER N.T.S. GUTTER P.U.E. & P.U.E. & PEDESTRIAN PROP, PROP. PEDESTRIAN EASE MENT 10,R/W 32' R/W10' EASEMENT 16, 16, TRAVEL LANE I TRAVEL LANE 2'[_- A ERA PAVEMENT �12 IMJmiI fm1M� PROP PROP. 2' LOCAL ROAD "B" VALLEY VALLEY GUTTER N.T.S. GUTTER PROP. PROP. LOT 20' LOT RESIDENCE 6' 1 8' 1 6' RESIDENCE *WALKING PATH -I I I III I I -I II I I III I I I=I I I=I I I=11 l l ti l l III I -I I I I WALK STREET *Note: Private (Bicycle & N.T.S. Pedestrian Only) P.U.E. & P.U.E. & PEDESTRIAN PROP. PROP. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 10, R/W 36' R/W I D' EASEMENT 18, 11 18, F1�TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE 2 I OVER A PAVEMENT �12 =1II-II MLL, - - - - - - - - - - - I�fi-1Tf-1T -"-1 IJ IJ IJ-1-1-1 �I IJ IJ IJ I� IJ IJ IJ IJ IJ "-"'- PROP. 2' PROP. 2' LOCAL ROAD "C" VALLEY VALLEY GUTTER N.T.S. GUTTER Note: Street sections may be refined or adjusted if approved by the City Public Works Director. Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 (0 MSA M SU 11 JG, = ... ,PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERINC (LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS (ON -SITE) FIGURE 10C PAGE 27 800 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 2.3.2 Street Sections The Vehicular Circulation Plan illustrates the network of streets and entries that provide connectivity to all areas within the Project. This section details the distinct Private, Local, Entry, Commercial, and Resort Drivesthat interconnectto comprise the circulation system. Each street classification is described below and illustrated in Figures 10A-10C, Typical Cross Sections, showing the minimum pavement widths that apply within the Project. The vehicular circulation system is as follows: Perimeter Streets Perimeter public streets designated on the City's General Plan Circulation Element border the Project on three sides. These roads are largely improved to their ultimate lane width, needing onlythe addition of minorwidening, a meandering multi -purpose trail, sidewalks, and parkway landscaping along the boundary of the Specific Plan. These roads comprise the major transportation corridors for this portion of the Coachella Valley and provide connection to interstate and regional access routes such as the Interstate 10 Freeway and State Highway 111 to the north. They also include sidewalks and bicycle lanes that link with these systems throughout the rest of the City. Avenue 58 on the north and Madison Street on the west are designated as Secondary Arterials with a right-of-way width of 102 feet. Within the right-of-way, improvements include four travel lanes separated by a raised landscape median and two painted bike lane. A supplemental landscape easement borders the right- of-wayto accommodate streetscape enhancements and a meandering pathwayfor shared use by golf carts, pedestrians, and cyclists. The Specific Plan street section for Avenue 58 conforms with the General Plan. However, Madison Street was constructed with a wider pavement section and slightly exceeds the General Plan street width. The Specific Plan reflects the built condition. Avenue 60 on the south is designated as a Collector with an ultimate right-of-way width of 80 feet. Ultimate improvements will include painted bike lanes and two travel lanes separated by a painted median. Internal Streets Internal streets provide overall Project connectivity and link the various neighborhoods, commercial, and resort areas. Streets within the resort core are intended for safe, shared, multi -modal use by cars, golf carts, bicycles and pedestrians.The internal street system is summarized below and illustrated in Figure 9: Vehicular Circulation and Figures 10 A-10C, Typical Cross Sections. 801 28 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN • 24' Right of Way - Resort Drive to be utilized by residents for access to their homes in the village core. Local Road A will provide internal circulation to residences within future PA -II neighborhoods. • 24' Right of Way - Resort Drive to accommodate secondary resort traffic and provide connections to Local Roads and the Resort/Commercial Drive. • 24' Right of Way - Local Road A to accommodate circulation around the village, within the estate lot neighborhood • 26, 32' Right of Way - Resort/Commercial Drive to be utilized for internal village and commercial area circulation, with limited parking for community guests. (Reference Figure 9: Vehicular Circulation for varying width locations.) • 40' Right of Way - Resort Drive functions as the central community arrival drive, with limited parking on one side. • 60' Right of Way - Resort Drive functions as the central communtiy arrival drive, with angular parking at the village core. 24', 28', 40' Right of Way - Entry Drive is the principal road by which all guests and residents enterthe communityand reach the village core. (Reference Figure 9: Vehicular Circulation for varying width locations.) 2.3.3 Non -Vehicular Circulation In addition to accommodating automobiles, the Project's Circulation Plan also addresses the movement of pedestrians, bicyclists, golf carts, e-vehicles, and other forms of alternative personal transportation Golf carts, e-vehicles and other alternative forms of low -speed transportation are accomodated in the streets with no striping or designated lanes. The overall intent and design of the Specific Plan is geared toward creating a transportation environment that accommodates vehicles, but also minimizes barriers to and promotes convenient multi -use connectivity throughout the Specific Plan. While pedestrian access will be incorporated at all levels, many internal and external trips cannot orwill not be undertaken by foot due to climate, distance, accessibility needs, or general inconvenience. Accordingly, the Specific Plan also accommodates access for bicycle, golf cart, and other forms of alternative personal transportation throughout the site and into the surrounding community. The Non -Vehicular Circulation Plan is shown in Figure 11. The components shown in Figure 11 are described below. 802 29 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Multi- UseTrait -An 8' wide multi-usetraitwill be incorporated along the main spine road to provide future neighborhoods with a central bike and pedestrian connection to the resort core as well as the main entry gate and retail area. Sidewalk - Sidewalks are included along key streets in the resort core to provide a completely interconnected pedestrian grid experience so that resort guests can walk or bike to all activities at the wave basin and resort facilities. Sidewalks are optional on local streets, depending on the street section chosen. Walk Street - Designed as narrow walkways between homes, Walk Streets provide connectivity with immediate residential frontage. The Walk Street network is one of the primary organizing components of the community plan. Terminating at the Boardwalk, Walk Streets are limited to pedestrian and bicycle use linking residents to The Wave, The Farm, and the greater network of trails and open spaces, enabling convenient access to alternate personal transportation modes throughout the community. The Boardwalk - The wave basin and its integrated pedestrian boardwalk is the terminus for nearly all of the Walk Streets - functioning as a gathering space as well as an active recreational amenity. 803 30 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 2.3.4Traffic Calming Low speed, low volume roads within the resort are intended to safely intermix vehicles, golf carts, bicycles and pedestrians. To achieve this, various design techniques are applied that cause vehicles to slow and exercise caution creating a safe shared -use environment for pedestrians and other transportation modes. Street segments are intentionally designed to be short (typically less than 200' long) with frequent stops and caution zones to ensure that vehicles maintain low speeds. Safe zones are demarcated at "walk street" crossings with visual and textural indicators to ensure that vehicles slow and yield to pedestrians. Traffic volumes are kept far lowerthan in traditional developments by situating recreation venues and services on site in close proximity such that they are most conveniently and quickly accessed on foot, by bike or by golf cart. Consequently, there will be very little need for a car. The focus on non - vehicular travel will ensure the safety and comfort of guests using all means of transportation on these shared roadways. The following sketch depicts a typical street/walk street interface illustrating the use of pavement texture, traffic control bollards, and alternating single sided parking stalls to create a safe, low speed roadway. 804 31 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: Project Boundary Multi -Use Trail Connecting Boardwalk Feature Sidewalk Walk Street I Source: MSA Consulting, Inc 0 MSA M U� "I I J G,�. > PLANNI NG>CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM AVENUE 58 w, i a 40 R'I+ , AVENUE 60 N.T.S. Exhibit Date: November 4, 2027 NON -VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN FIGURE 11 PAGE 32 805 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 2.4 OPEN SPACE PLAN Open space is a community asset with multiple benefits. These areas provide distant vistas, introduce appealing landscapes for a more attractive and comfortable living environment, and provide convenient access to recreational opportunities without leaving the Community. In addition to the the Wave basin, open space will be distributed throughout the Project with integrated plazas/greenspaces. A conceptual open space design is shown in Figure 12 Conceptual Open Space Plan, but remain subject to change as to specific location and type. The Wave Basin: The wave basin is the primary open space amenity and centerpiece to the resort, accommodating both surfers and spectators. Open Space Planning Area: West of the wave basin, the Open Space Planning Area (Planning Area IV) provides open space complete with a trail network that connects with the community trail system. Primary Entry Drive: The primary entry road is flanked by a generous landscape easement to create a aesthetically pleasing experience for residents and guests as they proceed from the main entry to the resort core and individual neighborhoods. Greenways: Greenways are interconnecting corridors (walk streets) distributed throughout the resort core. 806 33 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: Project Boundary The Wave Basin Retention Greenways Open Space Primary Entry Streetscape Corridor Public Streetscape Source: MSA Consulting, Inc 0 MSA M U� "I I J G,�. > PLANNI NG>CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM AVENUE 5$ CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN FIGURE 12 PAGE 34 807 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 2.5 SHEEP PROTECTION PLAN The project includes specific measures to ensure that Peninsular Bighorn Sheep (PBS) are restricted from entering the project and to promote proper human interactions between residents/guests and PBS. 2.5.1 Barrier Plan The Specific Plan will incorporate fencing and walls along the entire project perimeter as shown on Figure 13 Conceptual PBS Barrier Plan. This will serve as a physical barrierto prevent Peninsular bighorn sheep (PBS) from accessing the site. The fence/wall design will be approved by the City of La Quinta in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CA DFW). It will draw from the prototypical fencing types described in the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) "PBS Barrier Project" as shown in Figure 14 Typical PBS Fence Cross Section and Figures 15a & b Representative PBS Fence Photos, and will be consistent with the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Additionally, Tribal monitoring will apply to the fence construction and trail alignment in any areas containing Tribal cultural resources per City of La Quinta requirements. 2.5.2 Plant Palette The Specific Plan plant palette (Table 3 in Section 4.4.3) includes approved native specimens listed as "Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping" (CVMSHCP Table 4-112) and will avoid specimens listed as "Prohibited Invasive Ornamental Plants" (MSHCP Table 4-113) in certain open spaces areas and on lots adjacent to any sheep barrier as shown on Figure 13 Conceptual PBSBarrierPlan. In addition, the approved project plant palette will be referenced in the Project CC&Rs and will be enforceable by the property owners' association for the life of the project. 2.5.3 Education Program The project will prepare collateral materials for dissemination to buyers and hotel guests that educate and inform regarding the local environmental setting, including proper interactions with PBS. Additionally, Coral Mountain intends to collaborate with the Desert Recreation District regarding the planned public trail connection through the property. DRD's master plan envisions interpretative materials on the trail and markers intended to educate and inform experiences regarding the local setting, including desert flora and fauna. 808 35 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN I �AVENUE 58 Legend: — — — — Project Boundary Proposed 6' CMU Community Perimeter Wall Proposed 8' Sheep Barrier Alternative Barrier Alignment Restricted Plant Palette Additional Restricted Plant Palette For Alternative Barrier Alignment ''O%Project' (see Figure XX) or equivalent combination of 6' CMU and 2 decoraty, —wrought iron or tubular steel view fence" as appropriate. 4. Sep Table 3 of Section 4.4.3 for plan{", " restrictions. Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. 0 MSA M U� ' I I J G,�. ,PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM CONCEPTUAL PBS BARRIER PLAN FIGURE 13 PAGE 36 809 COPAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3' . 4' . 3' . 4' . 5' , 4.6' Z I'LL PKOP. 8' SHEEP o BARRIER EX - ----------- GROUND PROP. ROCK CATCHMENT Source: MSA Consulting, Inc 0 MSA M SU " I I J G, > PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING >LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM in is 24' PROP. BERM 8.8'- 14.5' BENCH LU Z— CIO 2% MIN. 20T. MAX. SPA Exhibit Date: November 4, 2027 TYPICAL PBS FENCE CROSS SECTION FIGURE 14 PAGE37 810 z a _V LL_ V W a a O LA w a z z CO L J a O U w al o L� O W Q � a _ a 2 W LL U z LU LL m a w H a z w Ln w a a w a w z a _V LL_ V w a a O LA w a z z CO L J a O U O mW W Q O d (V a 00 w LL U z LU LL m a w H a F- z w Ln w a a w a CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 2.6 INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS The infrastructure system planned to serve the Project described below will be designed to provide a coordinated system of infrastructure and public services to adequately serve the plan area at full buildout. Standards for infrastructure and public services relative to land use intensity envisioned for the Specific Plan area will be served by the following utilities: Sewer: Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Water: Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Electricity: Imperial Irrigation District (IID) Gas: Southern California Gas Company 2.6.1 Water and Sewer Plan The intent of the Specific Plan is to utilize existing water and sewer facilities where possible, and to provide additional or upgraded facilities as necessary. Water and sewer service for the Specific Plan area is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The CVWD provides domestic water from wells. Non -potable water sources are intended to be used for the irrigation of common landscape areas. An underground irrigation distribution system providing water to the valley traverses the western portion of the Specific Plan property from the northwest to the southwest and bisecting the site from east to west. The Specific Plan will conform to the requirements of the CVWD's current and future programs and requirements pertaining to water management and conservation. See Figure 16 for the Conceptual Water Plan and Figure 17 forthe Conceptual Sewer Plan. 2.6.2 Drainage Plan As shown in Figure 18, Conceptual Drainage Plan, the Specific Plan includes a comprehensive drainage system that collects storm flows, retains the incremental post - development increase and discharges surface water at pre -development levels. This drainage system design ensures that regulatory flood protection requirements are met to protect individual residences, the resort, and commercial uses as well as downstream properties. Surface drainage will be conveyed by the local street system from development areas to a system of basins and underground storm drains. As illustrated in the conceptual drainage plan, multiple retention basins and lakes (including the Wave), will be used for stormwater storage in accordance with regulatory design requirements. Retention basins will be constructed and sized to retain a 100- year storm event. These 813 40 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN basins will also include water quality elements that serve as structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) in accordance with the MS-4 Whitewater River Watershed Municipal Stormwater Program. 2.6.3 Off -Site Electrical Improvements Electric utilities for the site are provided by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). The developer is completing service planning with IID on the timing and scope of project level improvements to IID's system. The Project's CEQA document analyzes and covers these improvements in further detail. Figure 19, Off -Site Electrical Improvements, shows the location of the existing substation and proposed distribution line(s) and upgrades. 41 814 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: _ w m — Project Boundary ■w— Existing Water Main Proposed CN.W.D. Well Site Proposed Public 8" Water Main 12- Proposed Public 12" Water Main 18W Proposed Public 18" Water Main V ■ Notes: 1. Information shown is con�ept,vyy ddl only. , ,■ Final engineering design pypns maeviate. 2. Number and location of wells is prelimirfgry & subject to further discussion with C.V.W.D. Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. 1 MSA M U � "I I JG . ,PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM AU E N'U E 160 Exhibit Date: November 4, 2027 CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN FIGURE 16 PAGE 42 815 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: m m Project Boundary —s — Existing Sewer Main 1111111111111111111111111% 11111111111111, Proposed 8" Sewer Main 12S Proposed 12" Sewer Main —15S— Proposed 15" Sewer Main r AV'EN"UE58r, —s - Note: Information shown is conceptual only. � Final engineering design plans may deviate. I 1 i i 2/01 AN fff do R N.T.S. Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. MSA M U � "I I J G,�. > PLANNI NG>CIVIL ENGINEERING> LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM 23 12S , e� � ,2S l w f 55 VV AVENUE 60 S— -s Exhibit Date: November 4, 2027 CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN FIGURE 17 PAGE 43 816 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN LE Legend: Project Boundary Water Feature / Retention rr� Conceptual Drainage Sub -Area Conceptual 100-Year Sub -Area Retention iiiiiiiiiii a ME41I Site Drainage Flows Off -Site Drainage Direction --I • Note: Drainage and retention is conceptual g p I and subject to refinement with final engineering design. /- XL o '1 11 � Aice a r O l 1 P 70 rn ILI ���� O//D, JJ, ,,,,;, III vv i ' , ',� Illlllllllllllm�� v��� fill0 Oxman am wonIlllllu� f uuuuullll �,y �7uuuuu �M W A_Y E N U E 60 N.T.S. Source: MSA Consulting, Inc 0 MSA M SU "I' I I J G,�. > PLANNI NG>CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM Exhibit Date: November 4, 2027 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN FIGURE 18 PAGE 44 817 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: Project Boundary - Proposed Conduit System (y Proposed Transformer Bank P ' 4 / A I nn/ PROJECT SITE Ck v,, Z O I c / l i % ///% Source: MSA Consulting, Inc. Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 OFF -SITE ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS MSA M SU 11 JG = ... ,PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERING BLAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM FIGURE 19 PAGE 45 818 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: Project Boundary Phase Boundary — — — — — Development Area Boundary Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 1. Phasing plan reflects the anticipatep' construction sequence. It is conceptual and subject to refinement in response to market conditions. 2. Numbers 1 - 8 indicate Development Area&-,, Source: MSA Consulting, Inc 0 MSA M U � ' I I J G,�. > PLANNI NG>CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM AVENUE 58 I CONCEPTUAL PHASING PLAN FIGURE 20 PAGE 46 819 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3 Development Standards As provided for in local ordinance and Califonia Government Code, Specific Plans allow the creation of flexible and customized development standards suited tothe unique needs of individual projects. This Specific Plan is divided into four Planning Areas, each representing a logical sub -area of development with common characteristics and defining surface features (e.g. streets, lot lines, and other physical features). Planning Areas forthis Project are depicted in Figure 8, Land Use Plan. This chapter identifies the development standards applicable to each Planning Area, including a statement of development intent, permitted uses and development standards. Where differences may occur, these development standards take precedence overthe Municipal Code 3.1 PA -I NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN) 3.1.1 Development Intent Planning Area I (PA-1) is intended to allow for the construction of Neighborhood Commercial buildings with affiliated circulation and infrastructure improvements. PA-1 is located at the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street. This Planning Area contains approximately 7.7 acres of land and will allow for up to a maximum of 60,000 sf of Neighborhood Commercial building space. 3.1.2 Allowable Uses All uses listed in the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Section 9.80.020) are allowed in PA-1 in accordance with Table 9-5. except that the uses listed below are specifically considered permitted uses. TABLE 3.1A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES Retail Stores Food, liquor, and convenience stores Restaurants Banks Medical offices Boutique Agriculturel Footnotes: 1. Including orchards, date, citrus, and olive groves, vegetable gardens, etc. that are for community use or that supply produce to Farm -to -Table restaurants and fresh food markets on lots not exceeding 5- acres in aggregate size in the Planning Area. 47 820 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3.1.3 Development Standards These standards apply to all land within PA-1 as described within the text and graphics of this Specific Plan. TABLE 3.113 - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARD Max. Structure Height 35 ftl,z Max. No. of Stories 2 Min. Front Setback 10 ft Min. Rear Setback loft Min. Parking 1/250 ft GLA. Max. Building Floor Area in PA 1 60,000 SF Min. Building Setback to Avenue 58 25 ft Min. Building Setback to Madison Street F 25 ft Min. Setback from Interior Property Linea F 0 ft Min. Building/Landscape Setback from Residential PA4 40 ft/20 ft Max. Wall Height 6 ft Max. Light Pole Height 25 ft Min. Parking Provided' Per Code Min. Parking Dimension 9' X 19' Min. Bicycle Parking Per Code Min. Golf Cart / NEV Parking Per Code Min. Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces Per Code Footnotes: 1. Height is limited to 22' within 150' of the Madison &Avenue 58 R.O.W. 2. Architectural and roof projections, such as chimneys, spires, finials, parapets, and similar features not providing habitable or otherwise unusable space shall be permitted to extend up to fifteen feet above the maximum structure height. 3. Mechanical equipment to have a minimum 3-foot setback from interior property lines. 4. Landscape setback occurs within the building setback. 5. Including shared parking subject to provisions of LQMC 9.150.060 821 48 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3.2 PA II - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL) 3.2.1 Development Intent Planning Area II (PA -II) is intended to allow for the construction of residential neighborhoods with affiliated amenities, circulation, and infrastructure improvements. In addition to permanent year round use, various forms of short-term and long-term rentals, and fractional interest programs may be accommodated. Open space, golf, and various other complementary recreational uses may be integrated with residential development. PA -II contains approximately 232 acres of land and will allow for the construction of up to 496 single family attached and detached dwellings. 3.2.2 Allowable Uses All uses listed in the Low Density Residential (RL) District of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.40.030 are allowed in PA -II in accordance with Table 9-1. except that the uses listed below are specifically considered permitted uses. TABLE 3.2A- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES Single -Family Detached Dwellings Single -Family detached Patio Homes Duplexes Single Family Attached Dwellings Townhome Dwellings Condominium Multi -Family Short Term Vacation Rental Units Timeshare Units Fractional Ownership Units Lakes with active recreation Golf Courses, Driving Ranges, and Golf Related Uses. Clubhouse Community Gardens/BoutiqueAgriculturel Footnotes: 1. Including orchards, date, citrus, and olive groves, vegetable gardens, etc. that are for community use or that supply produce to Farm -to -Table restaurants and fresh food markets on lots not exceeding 5- acres in aggregate size in the Planning Area 822 49 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3.2.3 Development Standards These standards apply to all land within PA -II as described within the text and graphics of this Specific Plan. TABLE 3.213 - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARD DETACHED PRODUCT ATTACHED PRODUCT ACCESSORY BUILDING' Min. Lot Size 3,600 sf 3,600 sf N/A Max. Structure Height 32 ft 2,3 32 ft 2,3 28 ft 2,3 Max. No. Of Stories 2 F 2 2 Min. Area Per Unit 1,400 sf 1,000 sf 250 sf Min. Front Setback loft loft loft Min. Rear Setback 5 ft 5 ft 2 ft Min. I nterior/Corner Side Yard Setbacks' 5 ft / 5 ft 5 ft s / 5 ft 5 fts / 5 ft Min. Building To Building Setback e 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft Max. Wall Height Min. Parking Required 6 ft 2 garage/carport spaces plus 0.5 guest space 6 ft 2 garage/carport spaces plus 0.5 guest space 6 ft N/A Footnotes: 1. Detached garages/carports, casitos, carriage house units, and pool houses. 2. Height is limited to 22' within 150' of the Madison &Avenue 58 R.O.W. 3. Excluding chimneys, porticos, parapets, and other incidental architectural features etc. may exceed max. structure height by up to 5 feet. 4. AC units, trellis elements, pools, and spas are allowed to encroach into side and rear setback areas within 3' of property line. 5. O'setback allowed for products, such as duplexes or zero lot line units, that share a common wall or zero lot line units with walls built to the side property line. 6. Subject to applicable building code requirements 823 50 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3.3 PA -III TOURIST COMMERCIAL (CT) 3.3.1 Development Intent Planning Area I II (PA -III) is intended to allow for Resort Residential and Tourist Commercial uses and is located in the south-central portion of the Project. PA -III is structured around the wave basin, a private artificial wave generating basin. This Planning Area contains approximately 121 acres of land and will allow construction of the wave basin, up to a 150- key resort hotel,104 resort residential units, restaurants, golf, and other resort supporting uses and amenities. To help facilitate resort and wave basin operational needs, supporting uses may include water storage tanks and outdoor storage areas among other uses. Open gathering areas south of the wave basin may be used to host public and private events with non -permanent, portable convenience facilities (such as port -a -potties, shade structures, tenting, and catering equipment) through the approval of a Temporary Use Permit, consistent with Section 9.210.050 of the Municipal Code. 3.3.2 Purpose and Intent To provide for the development and regulation of a range of specialized Tourist Commercial uses oriented to resort lifestyle activity, located in areas designated within PA -III in the Specific Plan. Representative land use includes a resort hotel, the "Wave", clubhouse and resort amenities, and supporting functions to those uses. 824 51 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3.3.3 Allowable Uses All uses listed in the Tourist Commercial (CT) District of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.80.020 area [[owed in PA-1 in accordance with Table 9-5 except that the uses listed below are specifically considered permitted uses. TABLE 3.3A- TOURIST COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES PERMITTED III -A III-B III-C III-D III-E III-F III-G > 3 z z W _ USES OW 3 W > o 2� W W W 0 W W N LL W LL o Y 5 W H Q m [Barsandcocktail lounges Retail Stores Restaurants, other than drive -through ✓ Community Gardens/"Boutique" Agricultural Uses' ✓ [Golf Facilities Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Facilities ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Meeting and Club Facilities ✓ ✓ ✓ Parking Lots Recreational Water Amenities ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Resort Residential Resort Hotel 825 52 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Resort Support and Accessory Uses3 ✓ ✓ Clubhouse ✓ ✓ ✓ Water Storage Tanks ✓ Outdoor Storage (For Resort and Wave Basin ✓ ✓ Operations). Footnotes: 1. Including orchards, date, citrus, and olive groves, vegetable gardens, etc. that are for community use or that supply produce to Farm -to -Table restaurants and fresh food markets on lots not exceeding 5- acres in size. 2. Including short-term rentals and timeshare/fractional ownership units. 3. Including Operation, Maintenance, Administrative and Service Facilities, Equipment and Directional Lighting. 826 53 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3.3.4 Development Standards The following development standards apply to property in Planning Area III as described within the text of this Specific Plan. TABLE 3.313 - TOURIST COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARD III -A III-B III-C III-D III-E III-F III-G H W j 00 U = W OC W Q W O O 'W > O(A CA W O In Uj LL O m Min. Lot Size 20,000 sf 20,000 sf 20,000 sf 3,600 sf 3,600 sf 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Max. Lot Coverage Min . Lot Frontage Min. Livable Area i NA NA NA 1,400 sf 1,400 sf NA NA Min. Accessory Building Area Z NA NA NA 300 sf 300 sf NA NA Min. Front Setback 10' 0' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10, Min. Setback from Walk Streets or Sidewalks s Min. Setback from Wave Basin parcel 0' NA 0' 5'4 5'4 NA 0' Min. Front Facing Garage/Carport Setback NA NA NA 10' 10' NA NA Min. Side Facing Garage/Carport Setback NA NA NA 12' 12' NA NA Min. Rear Setbacks NA NA NA 5' 5' NA 25' Min. Interior/Corner Side Setback 5,6,' NAE:]E:]LE]LE]LNA NA 827 54 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Min. Setback from Planning Area II NA 50' 15' NA NA NA 50' Max. Height' 8 9 (ft/stories) 40'/4 45'/4 40'/3 30'/3 30'/3 40'/3 30'/2 Min. Bldg. Separation 9 Max. Pole Light Height 25' 80' 25' NA NA 25' 25' Max. Wall / Fence Height 6'l0 8 io 6 10 6 io 6 io 6>io 8 io 1 per full Min. Parking Provided", lz 1.per time 1 p 2 per unit 2 per unit 1 per500 1 per k key sf sf sf 1,000 sf employee Min. Parking Dimension 9' X 19' 9' X 19' 9' X 19' 9' X 19' 9' X 19' 9' X 19' 9' X 19, Min. Bicycle Parking Per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Min. Golf Cart / NEV per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Parking Min. Electric Vehicle per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code Per Code LPerCod]e Per Code Charging Spaces Footnotes: 1. Excluding garages, casitas or carriage units. 2. Detached garages/carports, casitas, carriage house units. 3. Where walk street occurs at rear or side property line, walk street setback shall govern. 828 55 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4. The following illustration depicts a typical interface between the Wave Basin and adjoining units, including the 5' property line setback. For conceptual purposes only, final layout and product to be determined. 7bi'1 5. AC units and other mechanical equipment may encroach within setback up to Y from property line. 6. O'setback allowed for products, such as duplexes that share a common wall or zero lot line units with walls built to the side property line. 7. Excluding chimneys, porticos, parapets, and other incidental architectural features up to 5 feet. 8. Including rooftop deck and terraces (e.g. railings, parapets, furniture, shade structures, umbrellas, stairs, access lifts, elevator housings, etc.). 9. Subject to applicable building code requirements. 10. Security fencing up to 8' may be allowed if approved by the planning director. 11. Parking requirements forspecial events and temporary uses to be reviewed through the Temporary Use Permit Process. 12. Shared parking may be allowed subject to provisions of LQMC 9.150.060 General Note: All residential standards apply to both detached and attached units 829 56 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3.4 PA -IV PARKS & RECREATION (PR) 3.4.1 Development Intent Planning Area IV (PA -IV) is intended to allow for open space, active -recreational, and ancillary uses compatible with the resort. This Planning Area contains approximately 24 acres that will allow open space and recreational activities, such as hiking trails, biking trails and ropes course. This also includes accommodation for a future public trail roughly following the toe of slope of Coral Mountain, to be constructed at such time as the Desert Recreation District obtains a lease extension from the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) to allow connecting public trails to the south and west. 3.4.2 Allowable Uses All uses listed in the Parks and Recreation (PR) District of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.120.020 are allowed in PA -IV in accordance with Table 9-8 except that the uses listed below are specifically considered permitted uses. TABLE 3.4A- OPEN SPACE PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES Multi -Use, Nature and Bike Courses/Trails Shade Structures, Relief Stations Recreational Equipment' Water Tanks and Reservoirs for purposes of domestic water use or fire flowl Wayfinding Signage Outdoor Storage (For Resort and Wave Basin Operations). Footnote: 1. Including but not limited to aerial adventure and rope courses, bicycle park, ziplines, etc. 2. Including private wells and appurtenant facilities. 830 57 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 3.4.3 Development Standards The following development standards apply to property proposed for development designated the Land Use Plan and/or Zoning figures as Parks and Recreation PR and as described within the text of this Specific Plan. TABLE 3.413 - OPEN SPACE RECREATION DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARD Min. Building Site n/a Min. Lot Frontage n/a Max. Structure Height 12 ft Max. Height- Ropes Course/Zipline 50 ft Max. Height - Other Recreational Equipment 20 ft Max. Building Coverage in PA IV 5,000 sf Max. Number of Stories 1 Min. Setback from Property Line loft Min. Parking Provided Per Code Min. Parking Dimension 9' x 19, Min. Bicycle Parking Per Code Min. Golf Cart / NEV Parking Per Code Min. Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces Per Code 831 58 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4 Design Guidelines The Wave Basin, Boardwalk, Hotel, and Surf Village at Coral Mountain The guidelines contained in this chapter identify unifying elements for design of permanent buildings and landscaping within each Planning Area. Renderings, simulations and photographs are intended as thematic illustrations and do not depict final designs, nor should they limit the range of creative expression available to the developer or their professional design team. These guidelines will be reflected in subsequent implementing subdivision maps and development permits.The Specific Plan emphasizes the creation of low -density, walkable neighborhoods oriented around the Wave as the central amenity within the Project. These guidelines will assist the developer of the Specific Plan project to execute a built environment that incorporates the following main concepts: Develop a private resort that includes recreational amenities, retail shops and dining venues. Establish residential neighborhoods that are linked through multi -use trails that connect neighborhoods throughout the Project. "Walk Streets" will provide internal connection between facilities within the Resort and the wave basin. 832 59 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Resort residential "Walk Street" with vehicular "Resort Drive" cross -street Establish a density hierarchy that situates the highest density development within the resort and gradually reduces density as you move away from the resort into the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Develop buildings which respond to the desert environment and utilize passive heating/cooling techniques through orientation and design. Incorporate a variety of open space and recreational uses (active and passive). Design a planned community that complements existing development in the surrounding area and is compatible with the surrounding environment. Develop a high -quality private wave basin (The Wave) that provides unique recreational opportunities for future residents of the Project and creates a landmark facility that will enhance the City's reputation as the "Gem of the Desert". Develop a community that is visually attractive and captures the essence of the Coral Mountain landscape. 833 60 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Embrace "Desert Modern" as the over -arching architectural theme for the entire project. The intent of this broad theme is to encourage creativity, flexibility, variability, diversity and individuality when considering the architectural design of buildings within the development. To implement these concepts, design guidelines and standards are provided for each of the Specifc Plan's four Planning Areas. 834 61 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL(PA-1) GUIDELINES 4.1.1 Design Vision The Neighborhood Commercial (PA-1) area will create a memorable arrival experience to the overall Project and provide an attractive public retail experience. This commercial cornerwill provide resortguests, homeowners, and neighbors with convenient retail, food and beverage services in a relaxed lifestyle environment. Neighborhood Commercial character inspiration The Neighborhood Commercial area has been planned as a publicly -accessible retail commercial use fronting Madison Street and Avenue 58. It is anticipated that the commercial development will include both neighborhood- and visitor -serving businesses. In addition to vehicular access, a multi -use trail will accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access from within the Coral Mountain Resort communities and from sidewalks on adjoining public streets. Commercial buildings will be one and two-story with pedestrian - level interest or detailing. The following principles are intended to guide the overall design and development goals of the Neighborhood Commercial area: Streets will maintain a narrow road profile with on -street parking to help slow traffic and encourage walking or electric cart circulation. Utilize smaller, neighborhood -scale retail buildings to create a walkable, pedestrian -friendly environment. Shade and pedestrian comfort will be provided through the use of arcades, shade devices, landscaping, and building orientation. 835 62 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Special areas such as paseos, plazas, and courtyards shall be created to further enhance the pedestrian scale of the commercial area and to provide comfortable spaces for outdoor dining. Provide flexibility in commercial architecture to encourage creative and innovative retail concepts. 4.1.2 Materials Materials for Neighborhood Commercial (PA-1) should be complementaryto Tourist Commercial (PA -III) materials and feature high-performance characteristics with sustainable attributes. Natural stone, stucco, architectural concrete, pre -finished metal panels, cementitious panels or siding, and thermally -modified wood siding may be utilized as the finish material forvertical surfaces in a range of natural colors which complement the desert landscape. Roofing products may be selected from a variety of metal profiles like corrugated or standing seam as well as a variety of membrane roofs. The colors of the roofing materials shall conform to a range of lighter tones to reduce heat gain such as white, sand, and gray. Roof mounted photo -voltaic solar panels may be used throughout the Projectto encourage the use of alternate transportation within the Project. Parking areas shall provide clearly defined pedestrian circulation. 836 63 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.2 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (PA -II) GUIDELINES Planning Area II (PA -II) will accommodate residential neighborhoods that take access from the primary entry road. Residences here will take advantage of spectacular south to southwest facing views of Coral Mountain and the Santa Rosa Mountains. Pedestrian and bike trails will provide multi -use connectivity to the Wave resort and Neighborhood Commercial area. These guidelines shall apply equally to both attached and detached products. 4.2.1 Design Vision The intent in PA -II is to create residential neighborhoods that maximize privacy between individual homes while embracing the desert landscape. Residential design may be reflective of contemporary desert architecture, desert vernacular, and simple interpretations of agricultural form. Spanish Colonial, Moorish, or other historically themed architectural styles should be avoided withing the "Desert Modern" theme forthe project. 837 64 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Residential design inspired and informed by the desert environment Planning for the residential areas within the Specific Plan is oriented towards and influenced by the resort and village core as the activity hub for the Project with open space and trail connections providing easy access to all amenities. Residents are encouraged to walk or use alternate forms of transportation to access the Resort to help promote a pedestrian friendly community and reduce traffic. The climate in La Quinta is characterized by sunny and hot weather in the summer and relatively mild winters with excellent air clarity. The design of residences shall incorporate elements that respond to these conditions, such as patios, courtyards, arcades, plazas, and outdoor pedestian areas which encourage residents to take advantage of outdoor living. Other residential site planning considerations include the following: The placement of structures should consider prevalent environmental conditions including sun orientation, prevailing winds, and desired views. Orientation of residential development edges should maximize view potential and access to natural open areas and recreation areas. Varying house configurations are encouraged to promote variety in the street scene. A combination of side -entering and front -entering garages with varied driveway locations are encouraged in orderto manage repetitive curb cuts and yard patterns. Recreation areas/greenbelt features shall be, wherever feasible, visible upon entry to neighborhoods to enhance neighborhood value. 838 65 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.2.2 Materials Building materials will feature high-performance characteristics meant to reduce carbon footprint with sustainable attributes. Natural stone, stucco, architectural concrete, pre - finished metal panels, cementitious panels orsiding, and thermally -modified wood siding may be utilized as the finish material forvertical surfaces in a range of natural colors which complement the desert landscape. Roofing products may be selected from a variety of metal profiles like corrugated or standing seam as well as a variety of membrane. The colors of the roofing materials shall conform a range of lighter tones to reduce heat gain such as white, sand, and gray. Roof mounted photo -voltaic solar panels may be used throughout the project. Sustainable and high-performance residential building materials 4.2.3 Massing and Scale Residences will be broken down into a collection of building forms to avoid a singular massing expression. Courtyards are encouraged as an effective way to engage the desert landscape while reducing the apparent mass of a home. Stand alone casitas or guest and pool houses as well as detached garages with and without carriage units are encouraged. Buildings shall be generally one-story in scale and appropriately massed with secondary two-story elements that create visual intrest. Porches, loggias, trellises, and brise-soled are encouraged to provide solar control and create opportunities to express crafted details. 4.2.4 Architecture Residences should express the individuality of the homeowner with the intent of creating a place instead of a Project. A variety of architectural designs are preferred. Further, special consideration should be given to passive solar building orientation in order to develop custom homes that perform efficiently in the desert environment. 839 66 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Windows and Doors To withstand the desert heat, high-performance residential windows with responsive passive solar shading strategies are encouraged. Window sash colors shall complement the building. Large panes or walls of operable glass allow spaces to flow seamlessly indoor - outdoor may be used at select locations. Window and door details that reveal the depth of the wall assembly are encouraged. If trim is used, it shall complement the building. The style of windows shall be compatible with the architectural style of the residence. The eclectic use of different window styles or shapes on one building plane may be considered appropriate provided the resulting composition remains coherent. Clerestory windows encouraging a natural stack effect for ventilation and visually allowing the roof to float above the wall plane shall be used as long as they are consistent with the style of the residence. A variety of residential window and door configurations adapted for the desert environment Entries The entry of a residence shall be an important design consideration for PA -II. Entries can be signified by porches, trellises, columns, recesses, projections, sidelights, other architectural features and\or vibrant color accents. Residential entries shall be scaled appropriately. 840 67 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Porches, Loggias, Balconies, and Railings Front porches encourage neighborly interaction and signify entry to the unit. Porches and loggias shall be incorporated into residential design to the greatest extent possible with a focus on craftsmanship and sun control. Porches, loggias, and balconies facilitate seamless indoor -outdoor experiences and provide visual interest, shadow, texture, and shade. Second story balconies shall be designed as an integral component of the residence and may be expressed as recessed or additive. Railing details will be in harmony with the architectural character of the residence. Residential porches functioning as shading devices from the intense sun Columns Columns shall be used as structural elements consistent with the architectural expression of an individual residence. Columns may be used as supports for porches, loggias, balconies, and roofs and express craftsmanship through connection details or material assemblies. Use of historic column forms (doric, ionic, corinthian, etc.) are not permitted. Chimneys Chimneys are often important design elements and signature features on residences. Chimney caps shall be simple in design and provide visual screening for vent or flue terminuses. The design of chimneys shall be compatible with residential architecture. 841 68 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Garage Doors Garage doors shall be compatible with the architectural style of the residence. Design details like porches, trellises, or deep recesses minimize the impact of garage doors from the driveway and street. It is encouraged that two single doors (or a single door designed to look like two doors) be utilized for two -car garages while three -car garages may incorporate a double door and single door or three single doors. Where three car garages are proposed, at least one garage entrance should be offset or detached from the remaining two entrances. Exterior Stairs Exterior Stairs shall be simple elements which complement the massing and form of the residence. Building Details Exterior residential mechanical equipment shall be screened from view by walls, fences, or landscaping. Guest houses, casitas, detached garages, and carports will be integrated into the design of individual residences and neighborhoods. Finish materials on raised planters for floral, vegetable, or herb gardens should complement materials used in the residence. Flashing and sheet -metal shall be prefinished. Vents, roof appurtenances, gutters, and downspouts shall be integrated into the residential design or screened from view. 4.2.5 Outdoor Spaces Residential courtyards and outdoorspaces will be designed to seamlessly integrate indoor and outdoor experiences. Trees, shade canopies, trellises, or other landscape elements provide shade and comfort and create outdoor gathering spaces that connect with interior uses. 842 69 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Thoughtfully planned outdoor spaces create privacy for individual residences Walls and Fences When walls and fences are visible from any street, open space, or other common areas, they shall be compatible in material, color, and design of adjacent architectural features. 4.2.6 Parking All residential parking areas, including auto -courts, shall be screened from view of adjacent roadways and neighbors. 843 70 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.3 TOURIST COMMERCIAL (PA -III) GUIDELINES 4.3.1 Design Vision Appropriate site planning as described below shall be used to ensure functional and aesthetic development within the Tourist Commercial area that contains the wave basin and resort hotel. These guidelines are intended to be flexible and not all guidelines are applicable in all situations. Reasonable application of guidelines in orderto achieve a high - quality consistency in design theme within the adjacent architectural context will be necessary. The following principles shall be used in the design and development of the Tourist Commercial planning area: Create a casual and comfortable neighborhood scale within a walkable, pedestrian friendly environment. Establish a "Main Street" feel with emphasis toward on -street parking. Encourage a variety of small boutique retailers to enhance the resort experience. Maintain flexibility to encourage creative and innovative resort concepts. Main Street arrival intoResort 71 844 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN The Tourist Commercial area has been planned to function as the social center of the community and contains a variety of resort hotel amenities including: The Wave, retail shops, a boutique hotel, and dining venues. The Tourist Commercial area has been designed to minimize the use of cars and encourage walking by linking central amenities with the neighborhoods through pedestrian -friendly roadway detailing and the creation of a community -wide "Walk Street" network. The following principles are intended to guide the overall design and development goals of the Tourist Commercial area: Establish a "Main Street" feel with an emphasis toward on -street parking "Walk Streets" will terminate on The Wave providing a physical and visual connection from the neighborhoods to the resort. Streets will maintain a narrow road profile with on -street parking to help slow traffic and encourage walking or electric cart circulation. The resort will focus on establishing neighborhood scale buildings and a walkable, pedestrian -friendly environment. HOA and club amenities will be spread throughout the resort to create several group function areas and a lively pedestrian experience. Shade and pedestrian comfort will be provided through the use of arcades, shade devices, landscaping, and proper solar orientation when siting buildings. Special areas such as paseos, plazas, and courtyards shall be created to further enhance the pedestrian scale of the community. 4.3.2 Elements The climate in La Quinta is characterized by sunny and hot weather in the summer and relatively mild winters that feature excellent air clarity. The design of Resort Residences in PA -III shall incorporate elements that respond to these conditions, such as patios, courtyards, arcades, plazas and Walk Streets which encourage residents to take advantage of outdoor living. Other residential site planning considerations include the following: The placement of structures should consider prevalent environmental conditions including sun orientation, prevailing winds and desired views. Orientation of residential development edges should maximize view potential and access to natural open areas and recreation areas. The entry of a residence shall be an important design consideration for PA -III. The majority of residences will have two entries one oriented towards a Walk Streetand one towards a vehicular street. 72 845 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Varying house configurations on corner lots are encouraged to promote variety along the street. A combination of side entering and front -entering garages and varied driveway locations are encouraged to breakup repetitive curb cuts and yard patterns. Guest parking shall be, wherever feasible, located to provide easy access to units. Neighborhoods bordering open areas shall be, wherever feasible, sited to maximize views of the amenities, while discouraging through access. Recreation areas/greenbelt features shall be, wherever feasible, visible upon entry to neighborhoods to enhance neighborhood value. Casual, relaxed main street vibe 4.3.3 Materials Architecture shall deferto the desert landscape with natural textures, tones, and materials consistent with the desert color palette of the Coachella Valley. Bright vibrant colors, echoing native desert wildflowers and artistic interpretations of the desert landscape, are encouraged as building accents or focal points within the resort. 846 73 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN In order to visually support the resort concept, there will not be a predominant exterior building material for the project. An eclectic variety of high-performance materials ranging from cast or rammed earth to board -formed concrete and stucco or thermally -modified wood will be used. Additionally, natural stone, pre -finished metal panels, and cementitious panels or siding may also be utilized as the finish material for vertical surfaces in a range of natural colors which complement the desert landscape. Roof colors ranging from gray, beige, white, sand, taupe, or natural metals such as raw aluminum and bonderized steel provide a range of lighter color options compatible with the desert landscape while reducing heat gain. Roof materials shall be selected for high-performance characteristics in a variety of profiles like corrugated or standing seam metal as well as a variety of membrane roofs such as TPO Thermoplastic Polyolefin (TPO) or Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC). Roof mounted photo -voltaic solar panels and roof mounted evaporative cooling mechanical equipment with proper screening may be used throughout PA -III. Varied building materials create eclectic look 74 847 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Reclaimed or pre -weathered wood, tile, concrete block, and oxidized steel shall be appropriately incorporated as accent materials and be consistent with the architectural style of the resort. Pedestrian -level roof detoil 848 75 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.3.4 Building Material Vignettes Thermally Modified Wood and Portland cement stucco Natural Stone, Board -formed Concrete, and Breeze Block Oxidized Steel, Standing Seam Roofing, and TPO Membrane Roofing 849 76 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.3.5 Massing and Scale Buildings with small footprints shall be used as an integral part of the site planning design to provide open view corridors to the wave basin in a casual village -like setting. Building faces shall be offset from each other to highlight the spaces in between and clarify pedestrian nodes. Offset building corners provide subtle articulation. The massing strategy shall consist of an eclectic mix of primarily one- and two-story building heights and roof forms. Architectural projections, overhangs, and recesses shall be used to provide shadow, articulation, and scale to building elevations. Variety of roof and building forms Roof decks and terraces are encouraged to provide visual interest as well as activity above the street level. This may be accomplished with step -backs in the second level massing. An eclectic mix of roof forms from flat, parapet, ramped, shed, and gable create visual interest to the roofscape in the resort. Buildings shall incorporate, passive solar orientation and active technologies to respond to the desert climate of the Coachella Valley. The casual scale of PA -III shall be reflective of a village -like surf resort with the primary focus being the wave basin. The majority of the buildings will be one-story with small footprints and pedestrian level interest or details. A multi -story hotel shall be the dominant building mass and neighborhood landmark. Avoiding visual monotony, buildings with small footprints create a porous or open edge condition to the wave basin and allow pedestrians to wander casually between structures. 77 850 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Porches, trellises, and brise-soleil break up the building mass at the pedestrian level while providing shelter or relief from the intense desert sun as viewed from the street. Porches, trellises, and brise-soleil provide visual setbacks for the hotel on front, side, and rear elevations. Shaded outdoor spaces Side elevations provide an appropriate level of articulation for secondary facades from the neighborhood perspective and pedestrian experience. A variety of roof forms from flat to ramped and gabled, create visual interest reinforcing the eclectic nature of the resort. Repetition and variation are common themes in design and will be evaluated for visual interest with the roof scape throughout the resort. 4.3.6 Architecture The architectural character for the project is "Desert Modern." Within this over -arching theme, the characterfor Planning Area III is intended to evoke the comforable, casual, vibe of a surf community. A variety of different building types will highlight an eclectic combination of materials and form. Sustainability, durability, and individuality are important factors to consider when designing buildings for Tourist Commercial uses. The 851 78 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN resulting architecture should reinforce the idea of creating a place, not a project, and be fully integrated into the planning, landscape, and programming of Coral Mountain. Comfortable, casual, surf village vibe from the Hotel's Long House Windows and Doors Large expanses of high-performance aluminum, wood, wood -clad, or steel windows and operable doorsystems scaled to the interiorspace as well as adjacent covered exterior space are encouraged to support a seamless indoor -outdoor experience. Frames shall be painted or appropriately colored to complement the architecture. 852 79 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN High-performance window and doorsystems promote indoor -outdoor living Rather than trimming, windows shall be integrated into the wall design to reveal the depth of the wall assembly. When expressed as a wall of glass, window or door systems shall be detailed to highlight the structural elements. The style of windows shall be compatible with the architectural style of the building. The eclectic use of different window styles or shapes on one building plane may be considered appropriate provided the resulting composition is complementary to the resort. Clerestory windows encouraging a natural stack effect for ventilation and visually allowing the roof to float above the wall plane shall be used as long as they are consistent with the building design. Entries Entry into individual buildings shall be identified by massing, wall offsets, roof elements, columns, porches, recesses or projections, accent windows or other architectural features. 853 80 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Emphasis on building entries Porches, Loggias, Balconies, and Railings Porches and loggias shall be incorporated into building design to the greatest extent possible with a focus on ground level detail and sun control. Porches, loggias, and balconies facilitate seamless indoor -outdoor experiences and provide visual interest, shadow, texture, and shade. Second story balconies and covered outdoor rooms shall be designed as an integral component of the building's architecture and may be expressed as recessed or additive. Railing details will be in harmony with the architectural character of the resort and express craftsmanship. Hotel roof deck offers views of the Wave Basin Columns Columns shall be used as structural elements consistent with the architectural expression of an individual building. 854 81 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Columns may be used as supports for porches, loggias, balconies, and roofs and expressed in structural steel, wood timbers, or as a simple mass element of stone, rammed -earth, architectural concrete, etc. Simple columns delineate outdoorspoces Chimneys Chimneys are often important design elements and signature features on buildings. Chimney caps shall be simple in design and provide visual screening forvent orflue terminuses. The design of chimneys shall be compatible with the building's architecture. Exposed metal flues with an applied decorative metal shroud are permitted. Garage Doors Resort residential garage doors shall be compatible with the architectural style of the residence. Design details like porches, trellises, or deep recesses minimize the impact of garage doors from the driveway and street. It is encouraged that two single doors (or a single door designed to look like two doors) be utilized for two -car garages in Resort Residential areas, while three -car garages may incorporate a double door and single door or three single doors. Exterior Stairs Exterior stairways shall be simple structural expressions which complement the architectural massing and form of the building. 855 82 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Connected upper and lower outdoor spaces Building Details Exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view by walls, fences, or landscaping. Roof mounted equipment shall also be screened with parapets as appropriate. Guest houses, casitas, detached garages, carports and gear / storage sheds will be integrated into the design of individual residences and neighborhoods. Finish materials on raised planters for floral, vegetable, or herb gardens should complement materials used on the building. Flashing and sheet -metal shall be prefinished. Vents, roof appurtenances, gutters, and downspouts shall be integrated into the building design or screened from view. Maintenance and Mechanical Buildings Simple, utilitarian, industrial out -buildings support Wave Basin operations. Access to these buildings is generally limited to staff; they are not public use. Durable, low - maintenance materials such as metal siding / metal roofing, stucco, cool -roof membranes, thermally modified woods, cement -board products, and exposed concrete block are allowed exterior finish materials. Exterior finish material colors will blend into the desert environment. Fencing may be wood, non -reflective metals, or concrete block. Building -mounted exterior code -required lighting will be source -shrouded down lighting and dark -sky compliant. Buildings will be 856 83 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN compatible with overall project design theme and outdoor areas will be screened from public view using walls, landscape or other methods as appropriate. 4.3.7 Outdoor Spaces Outdoor spaces in the Tourist Commercial area will be detailed to reinforce the desert, vilage aesthetic established by the wave basin and Resort. The Boardwalk is the principal social space for the community, connecting with the trail and walk street networks and encouraging interaction among residents. Outdoor spaces in this central area also prioritize pedestrian movement through the use of landscape elements and paving details that reduce traffic speed and maximize comfort for non -vehicular circulation. Outdoor gothering space shored by Hotel Cositos Common Space Elements/Outdoor Gathering Areas Special common space areas such as paseos, plazas, and courtyards shall be created between buildings to further enhance the pedestrian scale of the commercial area and to provide comfortable spaces for outdoor dining. Trash enclosures, loading docks, rubbish bins, transformers, satellite antennas, processing equipment, and any other unsightly apparatuses must be screened 857 84 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN from view through the use of landscape or architectural elements that are compatible with the building architecture in material, color and design. In Resort Residential areas, accessory buildings orstructuresforsports/ recreation, storage, administration, mail / delivery, shall be compatible with the neighborhood. Gateways The use of gateways shall be compatible with the building's architecture. When used, gateways shall define thresholds into exterior spaces at entries, porches, patios, and courtyards. Architecturally -integrated gateways Walls and Fences Walls and fences shall be compatible in material, color, and design of adjacent architectural features. Integrated pony walls extend architecture 858 85 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.3.8 Parking Off-street surface parking shall be screened from view through the use of plant material or low walls that are consistent with the architectural style. Landscape treatments shall be used at surface parking areas to provide shade. In addition to vehicular parking spaces, golf cart and bicycle parking areas will be provided per City code to encourage the use of alternate transportation. Parking areas shall provide clearly defined pedestrian circulation. 859 86 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.4 LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES The landscape design will establish an identity and theme for the Project and will be an overall unifying element. 4.4.1 Landscape Elements Figure 21 Conceptual Landscape Plan depicts the overall landscape concept forthe Project for illustrative purposes. Generally, the conceptual landscape plan incorporates landscape elements that establish a "sense of place" and creates visual unity and compatibility throughout the Project. Key landscape elements would include entryways, streetscapes, and common areas described below. Final landscape design will be subject to Site Development Permit review and Final Landscaping Plan permits. Project Entries The principal community entry from Madison Street is intended to create a "sense of place" upon entering the Project. Walls, fences, monumentation, and all other hardscape elements will utilize materials, color, and detailing that are compatible with the Project architecture. Landscape plantings distinguish the Project entrance through the use of grove trees and textural shrubs and grasses. Resort Drive The primary entry road leading from the primary project entry transitions to become the Resort Drive upon entering the Resort core. Providing on -street parking and a fromal row of street trees in the Resort and a more informal arrangement of water efficient trees and shrubs between the Resort and the entry, the landscape treatment along this spine road is designed to establish physical and visual connectivity between uses within the Project. Perimeter Public Streetscape Landscaping and trails along the perimeter roadway frontages are designed to provide a varied, comforting environment for pedestrians, cyclists, and equestrians through provision of a meandering multi -use trail as a component of the public street system. Informal arrangements of water efficient, drought tolerant plantings create interest through texture, color, and form. Common Areas Common area landscaping is intended to complement the resort nature of the Project, creating a unique sense of place and connectivity. West of the wave basin, the trail network connects to the community trail system. Select tree and shrub plantings will blend with the native landscape, providing shade for the open space areas and a backdrop to the 860 87 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN wave basin. South of the wave basin the area allows for flexible, temporary uses during special events. Landscape elements will be designed to accommodate mobile vendors, tents, portapotties, and event visitors, creating comfort but allowing flexible uses. 4.4.2 Thematic Planting Zones Figure 22, Planting Zones Diagram identifies the various Thematic Planting Zones within the project. Each Planting Zone is described in further detail in Figures 23-26. Native Landscape: As illustrated in Figure22, Planting Zones Diagram, this Area is to be maintained as existing landscape and preserved as open space. These areas may require refurbushing and some ongoing maintenance. Desert Revegetation: Depicted in Figure 23, Planting Zones Diagram: Desert Revegetation, the Desert Revegetation Landscape links the community with the native Coral Mountain landscape by creating an enhanced planting zone that steadily transitions to the surrounding open spaces and landscapes as it nears the southern and western perimeter of the Coral Mountain Resort property. This enhancement of a largely native landscape provides a more robust trail and outdoor pursuits experience while also creating a varied and dynamic backdrop forthe wave and the greater resort community, helpingto screen Back of House elements and the view of the dike from the village core. Desert garden: As shown in Figure 24, Planting Zones Diagram: Desert Garden, the Desert Garden Landscape engages the resort property with the estate residential lots and the planned future residential phases within the community ocean by cultivating a curated "desert" environment within the common areas along roadways or woven into each neighborhood. Residents can walk out their back door and immediately be immersed in the Coral Mountain resort experience. Ths garden landscape is characterized by a mix of date palms and washingtonia palms, coastal scaevola, beach grasses, and a selection of water efficient accent trees, shrubs, and grasses. As part of the planting concept, "edible plant palettes" may be established within this zone as appropriate to service culinary and community food security needs. 861 88 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Desert Oasis Depicted in Figure 25, Planting Zones Diagram: Desert Oaisis the Desert Oasis Landscape is located at the main arrival points, the entry road, Surf Club, and the Farm, providing guests a more punctuated, welcoming garden retreat as a contrast to the surrounding desert landscape. Ths landscape is characterized by a greater mixture of foliage colors and types, with species that maintain their appearance throughout the year. The landscape and architecture work together to provide a shady and comfortable environment. Flowering accent plants add seasonal interest throughout the year. The design geometry is casual, but has a direct relationship to the surrounding architecture. The contrast between straight, formal architectural walls and the flowing, organic landscape creates a dynamic signature for key gathering spaces within the resort. Village Landscape Illustrated in Figure 26, Planting Zones Diagram: Village Landscape, the Village Landscape consists primarily of streetscape and limited common area plantings within the village core, and is more "urban" in character. Trees and palms that afford shade and provide an architectural quality through their arrangement are a domanint component of this landscape zone. Accent shrubs, grasses, and succulents enhance the urban, architectural quality of the village core. Allees or groves of palm or citrus afford a geometric framework within select "public" spaces such as the hotel arrival, along the boardwalk, or in parking areas. In parks or other village common areas the planting geometry is more casual and varied. As part of the planting concept, "edible plant palettes" may be established within this zone as appropriate to service culinary and community food security needs. 862 89 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Legend: " .. Project BoundaryfigA' ry `; / dl j J r Iys AR All Ail 0 T ' v iI d i I , I y: i 1 , r- Of IN A i � R M A it/i✓ D,� i (�, �i� I�IIa�, H �� �h I � /��I ��%���/ �i�/ � �l`✓I ii of �/i o1 9�' Ills „,-� it I rY W 1 /�N 1 i /j j/%F j / i%J,�o ✓�r� ` / J✓ i�� 4-0 N.T.S. Source: Vita Exhibit Date: November 4, 2021 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 10 ,PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERING BLAND SURVEYING MSACONSULTINGINC.COM FIGURE 21 PAGE 90 863 z u LL D LLI 0. V) 0 V) LLI ix z z D 0 0 u h M, 0-0 rcr p Q 0 p E tp E 2 �v 12 AN II fi�Y 1 Y�JY, �, /j�� Y)r✓�� /p r k 4Z J a U LL L LI a V) H O Ln L LI a Z Q D J Q O V W >� '0 z SU �U w Z D Z z0 iai qZ J a LL_ U W a LN Nr I..L ,0 V I NW ix Q D J a 0 V r r rl Ym P n � i � Ili y, a: 6 2 'I Ulie uL i rWIR �p "Al [r1 If W a i O u n a 0 j (j zU �wZ V, F 0 to J Z z0 iai z u LL D LLI 0. V) Nr V0 ) LLI ix z 7 D 0 0 u RgF 5 O O CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 4.4.3 Plant Material Palette Table 3, Plant Material Palette, provides a list of compatible trees, shrubs, and groundcovers to be incorporated as part of the landscape design. Landscape architecture for the Specific Plan is intended to create a lush desert character of visual variety and textural interest while complying with water conserving techniques based on plant selection and technical irrigation system design. Consistent with this goal, use of drought tolerant plant material is a primary consideration in the development of the plant palette to further aid in the conservation of water while promoting this lush desert theme in the prevailing landscape image. To provide guidance to the builders and designers of future projects within the Project, the plant material palette gives guidance to builders and developers within the Project. Species in addition to those listed are to be considered in order to provide diversity; however, the plant material in the list provided is relatively successful in the unique soil and climactic conditions of Project site. TABLE 3: PLANT MATERIAL PALETTE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Acacia Aneura Mulga Trees Acacia salicina* Native Willow" Acacia saligna* Blue Leaf Wattle* Acacia smalli* Desert Sweet Acacia* Acacia stenophylla* Shoestring Acacia* Albizia julibrissin Mimosa Tree Bauhinia purpurea Purple Orchid Tree Brahea armata Mexican Blue Brachychiton populneus Palm Bottle Tree Caesalpinia cacalaco Cascalote Callistemon viminalis Bottlebrush Tree Cercidium floridum Blue Palo Verde Cercidium hybrid Desert Museum Cercidium praecox Palo Brea Chamerops humilis Med. Fan Palm Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow Chitalpa tashkentenis Chitalpa Chorisia linearis Desert Willow Chorisia speciosa Silk Floss Tree 869 96 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Citrus Species Citrus Cupressus sempervirens Italian Cypress Indian Dalbergia sissoo Indian Rosewood Eysenhardtia orthocarpa Kidneywood Fraxinus Uhdei 'Majestic Beauty' Evergreen Ash Fraxinus velutina Arizona Ash Geijera parviflora Australian Willow Humilis Med. Fan Palm Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Lantern Tree Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Lysiloma microphylla var. thomberri Feather Bush Melaleuca quinquenervia Cajeput Tree Olea europaea* Olive*,** Olneya Tesota Desert Ironwood Parkinsonia aculeata* Mexican Palo Verde* Phoenix dactylifera* Date Palm* Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine Pinus eldarica Afghan Pine Pinus halepensis Aleppo Pine Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache Pithecellobium mexicanum Mexican Ebony Pithecellobium spinosa Texas Ebony Prosopis chilensis Chilean Mesquite Prosopis glandulosa Texas Honey Mesquite Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak Quercus suber Crok Oak Quercus virginiana Southern Live Oak Rhus lancea African Sumac Tipuana tipu Tipu Tree Thevetia peruviana Yellow Oleander Ulmus parvifolia "Drake" Drake Elm Vitex agnus-castus Chase Tree Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm Washingtonia robusta* Mexican Fan Palm* 870 97 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN SHRUBS Acacia farnesiana" Bucida buceris Prosopis species Caesalpinia pulcherrima Carissa grandiflora Cassia nemophilla Chrysactinia mexicana Chrysothamnus nauseosus Dietes vegeta Dodonaea viscosa Hemerocallis hybrid Heteromeles arbutifolia Hibiscus species Justicia califomica Leucophyllum Species Myrtus communis'Compacta' Nandina domestica Photinia fraseri Phormium tenax Pittosporum tobira Prunus caroliniana Rhaphiolepis indica Rosmarinus officinalis Ruellia brittonia'Katie' Ruellia califorica Simmondsia chinensis Sophora secundiflora Tecoma stans'Angustata' Tecomaria capensis Xlyosma congestum GROUND- Acacia redolens `Desert Carpet" Baccharis x Centennial COVER Bougainvillea Species Dalea greggii Lantana camara `New Gold Lantana montevidensis Myoporum parvifolium Pyracantha fortuneana Rosmarinus officinalis'Prostratus' Turf Verbena species Sweet Acacia" Black Olive Mesquite Red Bird of Paradise Natal Plum Desert Cassia Chamisa Damianita Daisy Fortnight Lily Green Hopseed Bush Daylily Toyon Hibiscus Chuparosa Texas Ranger Compact Myrtle Heavenly Bamboo Photinia New Zealand Flax 'Wheeler's Dwarf' Carolina Laurel Cherry India Hawthorn Rosemary Compact Ruellia Ruellia Jojoba Texas Mountain Laurel Yellow Bells Cape Honeysuckle N.C.N. Prostrate Acacia" Centennial Coyote Brush Bougainvillea Trailing Indigo Bush New Gold Lantana Purple Trailing Lantana Prostrate Myoporum Firethorn Creeping Rosemary Turf Verbena 871 98 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN VINES Antigonon leptopus Bougainvillea species Clytostoma callistegioides Ficus pumila Macfadyena unguis-cati Rosa banksiae ACCENTS Annual Color Agave americana Agave deserti Agave desmettiana Agave parryi Agave victoriae-regi nae Aloe barbadensis Dasylirion wheeleri Echinocactus grusonii Festuca glauca Fouquieria splendens Hesperaloe parviflora Muhlenbergia emersylleyi 'Regal Mist' Muhlenbergia rigens Nolina bigelovii Nolina microcarpa Phormium tenax Yucca rostrata Coral Vine 'Barbara Karst' Violet Trumpet Vine Creeping Fig Cat's Claw Creeper Lady Bank's Rose Century Plan Desert Agave Agave Parry's Agave Queen Victoria Agave Aloe Vera Desert Spoon Golden Barrel Cactus Common Blue Fescue Ocotillo Red Yucca Bull Grass Deer Grass Nolina Bear Grass New Zealand Flax Big Bend Yucca *Species that are prohibited within certain areas of the project as depicted on Exhibit 13, Conceptual PBS Barrier Plan. **Fruiting varieties limited to trees designated for active farm -to -table growing at least 500 feet from any western project boundary, ornamental use is prohibited. 872 99 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 5 Plan Administration This chapter describes the procedures for administration and implementation of the Specific Plan 5.1 IMPLEMENTATION The Specific Plan establishes the general intent and comprehensive framework for development of the Project. However, prior to construction, various implementing approvals with greater design detail are required, as noted below. General Plan Amendment (GPA) -The GPA will amend the current General Plan land use designations to General Commercial, Low Density Residential, Open Space - Recreation, and Tourist Commercial. The GPA requires public hearings before the Commission and the Council. Zone Change (ZC) - The ZC will change the existing zoning of the Specific Plan Area to Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Parks and Recreation, and Tourist Commercial. The ZC requires public hearings before the Commission and Council. Specific Plan (SP) - The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan will be adopted as the master plan governing the allowable land uses, development standards and design guidelines for the Project. The SP requires public hearings before the Planning Commission (Commission) and the City Council (Council). Tentative Tract Map (TTM) - TTMs are intended to implement the project and subdivide the property into smaller lots for development. TTMs may be filed with each phase of development as necessary. Each TTM will require review by the Commission. Site Development Permit (SDP): SDPs are required by the City for final approval of landscape design, architectural design, and site plans. Individual SDP's may be required for each phase of development. These may be processed concurrent with or subsequent to other entitlement approvals. Each SDP will require public hearings before the Commission. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): Allowable uses that require a CUP shall be processed in accordance with Section 9.210.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Temporary Use Permit (TUP): TUPs are required by the City to accommodate special, unique, or limited duration activities that might otherwise be outside the provisions of normal zoning. Temporary uses are anticipated and allowed by this Specific Plan as 873 100 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN discussed in Section 2.1. TUPs are reviewed administratively by the Design and Development Director and do not require a public hearing. Development Agreement (DA): The DA would vest the applicant's right to develop the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan area pursuant to the entitlements described above, address short-term rentals within all planning areas of the project, provide assurances to the City that the project will have a net positive fiscal impact on the City, ensure the timely completion of infrastructure to serve the project and surrounding area, and ensure that the project design features and mitigation measures are enforceable project requirements. 5.2 AMENDMENT Administrative Changes - Minor modifications that are consistent with the purpose and intent of the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan are allowed at the discretion of the Design and Development Director or designee. Therefore, it is intended that this Specific Plan provide City Staff with the flexibility to interpret the details of Project development as well as those items discussed in general terms in the Specific Plan without requiring a Specific Plan Amendment. Requests for administrative changes shall be made in writing. If it is determined that changes or adjustments are necessary or appropriate, these shall be approved administratively by the Design and Development Director or designee. After approval, any such administrative change shall be attached to the Specific Plan as an addendum and may be further changed and amended from time to time as necessary. Representative examples of such changes may include, but are not limited to: • The addition of new information to the Specific Plan maps or text that do not substantially change the effect of any regulation. The new information may include more detailed, site - specific information. • The transfer of dwelling units and or density within Planning Areas while not exceeding the maximum number of allowed units in the Specific Plan and not exceeding 25% of units/density of target Planning Area. • Changesto thesize and configuration of residential lots provided thatthe maximum number of allowable units is not exceeded. 874 101 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN • Adjustment of Planning Area boundaries identified in this Specific Plan. • Changes to Project infrastructure such as drainage systems, roads, water and sewer systems, etc. • Modification of architectural or landscape design criteria or details. Amendments - If the Design and Development director determines that the proposed change is not in conformance with the intent of the current Specific Plan approval, the Specific Plan may be amended in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 9.240 of the City of La Quinta Municipal Code. 5.3 INTERPRETATION Uses Not Listed - Allowable uses are as specified in the appropriate zoning district or as modified in the Specific Plan. The Design and Development Director may determine that a use not listed is included within or comparable to a listed use and, once so determined it shall be treated in the same manner as a listed use. Application ofStandards -Where there is ambiguity between the Specific Plan and the Zoning Code, the Design and Development Director shall review pertinent information and determine which code or standard applies. All determinations shall be in writing and shall be attached to the Specific Plan as noted underAdministrative Changes, earlier in this section. 5.4 ENFORCEMENT The enforcement of the provisions of this Specific Plan shall be by the following: • The City of La Quinta Design and Development Department shall enforce the development standards and design guidelines set forth herein. • Any administrative decision or interpretation of this Specific Plan may be appealed to the Planning Commission. Likewise, any decision by the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council per 9.200.110 LQMC provisions. • The City of La Quinta shall administer the provisions of the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan in accordance with the State of California Government Code, Subdivision Map Act, the City of La Quinta General Plan, and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code. 875 102 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN • The Specific Plan development procedures, regulations, standards, and specifications shall supersede the relevant provisions of the City's Municipal Code, as they currently exist or may be amended in the future, except as provided in this Specific Plan. • All regulations, conditions, and programs contained herein shall be deemed separate distinct and independent provisions of this Specific Plan. In the event that any such provision is held invalid or unconstitutional, the validity of all the remaining provisions of this Specific Plan shall not be affected. • Any development regulation and building requirement not addressed in this Specific Plan shall be subject to all relevant City of La Quinta ordinances, codes, and regulations. 876 103 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 6 General Plan Consistency California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Section 65450 - 65457) permits the adoption and administration of specific plans as an implementation tool for elements contained in the local general plan. Specific plans must demonstrate consistency in regulations, guidelines and programs with the goals and policies set forth in the general plan. This section analyzes the consistency between this Specific Plan and the La Quinta General Plan 2035. The City of La Quinta General Plan 2035 contains the following elements: Land Use, Circulation, Livable Community, Economic Development, Parks, Recreation and Trails; Housing; Air Quality; Energy and Mineral Resources; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Water Resources; Open Space and Conservation; Noise; Soils and Geology; Flooding and Hydrology; and Hazardous Materials. Each element of the General Plan 2035 contains a summary of goals which reflect the City's values, aims, and aspirations. They also address the physical development of the City, the protection of people and property from man-made hazards, and the preservation of the City's assets. This amendment to the La Quinta General Plan will facilitate a Specific Plan allowing Tourist Commercial and Low Density residential uses within a previously approved, private residential community. It is consistent with General Plan policy as outlined in the following sections. Each element's relevant goals are used in the Specific Plan as the basis for evaluating the Specific Plan's consistency with the City's General Plan 2035. Applicable goals are stated below followed by a statement of how the Specific Plan as amended conforms thereto. 6.1 LAND USE ELEMENT GOAL LU-1: Land use compatibility throughout the City. o The site components (neighborhood commercial, low density residential, resort residential, resort hotel, resort amenities, wave basin, and recreational open space amenities) ore compatible with surrounding residential, open space, and neighborhood commercial uses. The project is seperated from adjacent uses by surrounding arterial streets and physical topographic barriers, such as Coral Mountian. Off -site development impacts are anticipated to be minimal. GOAL LU-2: High quality design that complements and enhances the City. 877 104 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN o The Specific Plan includes detailed design guidelines in Section 3 to guide high - quality development throughout the Specific Plan area. The high -quality design, amenities, and mix of land uses on the site will work to help create a high -quality landmark project that will complement and enhance the character of the City. GOAL LU-5: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. o The project proposes high -quality housing of varying types and sizes with access to resort and recreational amenities, thus enhancing housing choice for potential buyers. o The Specific Plan provides fora broad range of housing types in Planning Areas 11 and lll, that offer a broad range of housing options on the site. Planning Area ll, designated as Low Density Residential, anticipates detached or attached residential dwelling units with densities ranging from 0.8-4 dwelling units per acre. The land use plan for Planning Area 111 anticipates attached residential dwelling units with densities ranging from 2.5-2.8 dwelling units per acre. GOAL LU-6: A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City's residents and the region. o The Specific Plan includes both neighborhood commercial and tourist commercial land uses which will generate revenue and create employment opportunities. The proposed project would increase services associated with tourism and neighborhood commercial uses. 6.2 CIRCULATION ELEMENT GOAL CIR-1: A transportation and circulation network that efficiently, safely and economically moves people, vehicles, and goods using facilities that meet the current demands and projected needs of the City. o The project proposes a private circulation system to provide safe and efficient passage for pedestrians and motorists throughout the site. o The project proposes to build out Madison Street, Ave 58 and Ave 60 to ultimate standards per the General Plan. GOAL CIR-2: A circulation system that promotes and enhances transit, alternative vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian networks. 878 105 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN o The project proposes a private circulation system with low -speed, low -volume internal streets that will safely accommodate both vehicles and pedestrians. 6.3 LIVABLE COMMUNITY ELEMENT GOAL SCA: A community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents. o The Specific Plan includes elements to address the goal of the Livable Community Element, which generally is intended to assist the City in developing a more united community through resource conservation, built environment enhancement, promotion of alternative forms of transportation, and improvement of community health. The Specific Plan is consistent with this goal by promoting a high -quality mix of uses that will greatly enhance the built environment, will promote walkability in the resort center of the project, and will provide ample opportunities for active recreation. 0 6.4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT GOAL ED-1: A balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. o The project promotes a balanced and varied economic base for the City by introducing a resort with up to 150 hotel keys, a water -based active recreation amenity, and resort residences that will boost tourism and promote fiscal stability. Additionally, the residential use will incrementally increase demand for commercial goods and services in the region, thus enhancing the economy. GOAL ED-2: The continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in the City. o The project promotes the continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in La puinta by providing a resort featuring a hotel with up to 150 keys, a water -based active recreation amenity, and supporting uses to enhance the resort experience. 6.5 PARKS, RECREATION AND TRAILS ELEMENT GOAL PRA: A comprehensive system of parks, and recreation facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. o The Project designates areas set aside for recreational open space uses, as well as a water -based active recreational amenity that will provide 879 106 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN recreational opportunities currently not available in the City. Additional open space will be scattered throughout PA-Il. 6.6 HOUSING ELEMENT GOAL H-1: Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. o The project anticipates the development of up to 600 attached and detached dwelling units with densities ranging from 0.8-4 dwelling units per acre, thus contributing to the City's market rate housing stock. GOAL H-4: Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties. o The project will complement the surrounding residential communities. Development of the propertyinto a boutique hotel, neighborhood commercial, recreational open space, and residential uses will add value and amenities to neighboring communities and the City. GOAL H-6: Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. o The project promotes water conservation through the use of drought tolerant plant materials and water efficient irrigation techniques. The project will comply with all City and water district regulations and building codes for water conservation, energy efficiency, and building standards. The project will also comply with all applicable green building requirements. 6.7 WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT GOAL WR-1:The efficient use and conservation of the City's water resources. o The project promotes water conservation through the use of drought tolerant plant materials and water efficient irrigation techniques. The project will comply with all City and Coachella Valley Water District regulations and building codes for water conservation. 1*1 IN rol 880 107 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN 6.8 OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOAL OS-1: Preservation, conservation and management of the City's open space lands and scenic resources for enhanced recreational, environmental and economic purposes. o The project includes significant open space amenities. It includes a water - based recreational amenity for use by community residents and guests. The project incorporates connections to the public sidewalk and public trail system for convenient walking, jogging, and biking activities. 6.9 NOISE ELEMENT GOAL N: A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and resort character. o The project establishes residential, resort residential, and neighborhood commercial uses with compatible noise levels in an existing residential area. These uses maintain and enhance the City's residential and resort character and will be subject to the City's noise ordinance. Noise levels on Avenue 58 and Madison Street are not excessive and the project is buffered by a perimeter community wall. The project with comply with any noise mitigations identified during the project CEQA review. 881 108 P co cl z W W J NN z O W CO CO Q Z O H > w O w F-- Z O 0 �n U Z Z w w Q p Z =) w O z m J CL Lf W W Q w z z O z W Q w QLU U Q> p > Z N ~ rW P- U W> HZp ZZ 3 OZUOWZ O X 0 ZOOWO Qwm � = ww w w � = w N co UU w ww w O Q U OU� ww 0OL >=L In vwi � p p p p p U U U U U U U U U U U U U U w w w w w z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 M- M- IL CL 0- N NSLO N N SQ SQ N N�n N NS�2 �Q 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W d d d I I w J m Q Cw Z W Z < w I Z w wQef w w w Q n n Lu U z w w W w �} p Z m > J W Z T Q H IZ OLU w Z p w O N Q Q Z J U O Q z w w U p O � w w w 0 w Q U _ w vN pZ m 0w Z m _� m Z W U p Q p w QOOw>vLu wUnOw�pQxQCQCZC�O>�QOO?QOU=OQrp w Z > Q Q Q m U U W W W G G G Z Z O O 0- M- CL CL� Jcjo� v) v) r w w Zin�UU���oUd�v�iXQmZO QQQmUULULU zzOOCLCLEL 02(ncn LL Y= \ / au MCC) 00LL / M l OSCL OO1c W J N Mo O 3 `h O 'o a CL w \ ASZ w a IZ V �� N �o \ I O I I N W N W O I 1lu= O W d�U w LU 1 W i a 55' w OCL ,SL \ R 2q8 �2� a� — N C OM � M LL. O —00 M V co � � N O 1-1 N coN U-) co ao u7 cal c 'o CD co � 91 ZZ� !�17 mom.00,08 9 ,.8S.LOM N i� IMMEM i DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 1 of 1 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (""City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. All subsequent projects submitted within the Specific Plan boundary shall substantially conform to this Specific Plan. 3. The Mitigation Measures provided in the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report shall apply to all projects constructed under this Specific Plan. 4. Within 30 days of approval, a final electronic copy of the Specific Plan shall be provided to the City for its files. 5. Outdoor storage shall be permitted in PA III-B and III-G only if fully screened from view. Specific Plan Table 3.3A shall be amended to include the words "fully screened from view" for Outdoor Storage. 6. The applicant shall provide the City and CDFW with a detailed plan, prior to any ground disturbance (including grubbing) on the project site, and shall construct a Peninsular Bighorn Sheep barrier which meets the requirements of the City and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 7. If any brush clearance obligation is imposed on any structure or project area within the Specific Plan boundary in the future, such brush clearance will not be permitted on BLM property. This requirement shall be applied to all future project approvals. 8. The perimeter improvements on Avenue 58, Madison Street, Avenue 60 and the western property line shall be completed prior to receipt of the first certificate of occupancy for the first development project on the site. These improvements will include curb, gutter, sidewalk, multi -use trail, parkway landscaping and project perimeter wall. ESW EXHIBIT G DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 1 of 28 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (""LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.laquintaca.gov. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form - Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design & Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) ::. DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 2 of 28 The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 4. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent (""NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006- DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (""SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): E-MIN DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 3 of 28 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Master Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post - construction BMPs as required. 6. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. E:M:&. DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 4 of 28 PROPERTY RIGHTS 8. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 9. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 10. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) - No additional right of way dedication is required. 55 feet from the centerline of Madison Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right of way 2. Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial) - 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 along the project boundary 3. Avenue 60 (Collector) - 40 feet from the centerline of Avenue 60 for a total 80-foot ultimate developed right of way 11. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street rights -of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 12. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Property line shall be placed at the back of curb similar to the lay out shown on the tentative map and the typical street section shown in the E:�M DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 5 of 28 tentative map. Use of smooth curves instead of angular lines at property lines is recommended. Streets "A" thru "P" - Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited, and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&R's. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 13. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 14. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 15. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of - way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 17. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights -of -way as follows: A. Madison Street (Secondary Arterial) - 10-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) - 10-foot from the R/W-P/L. E;X41 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 6 of 28 C. Avenue 60 (Collector) - 10-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 18. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 19. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street, Avenue 58, and Avenue 60 from lots with frontage along Madison Street, Avenue 58, and Avenue 60 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative tract map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 20. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 21. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties And Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. E-W DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 7 of 28 23. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 24. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Construct 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide for full access movements at the primary entry and restore the median landscaping. A left turn deceleration lane for the northbound traffic serving the main project entry shall provide a minimum of 150 feet of vehicle queuing as determined by the traffic study. 2) Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan to accommodate a 12-foot travel lane and a 6-foot shoulder and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi- use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 or as approved by the City Engineer along the Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall E:3%. DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 8 of 28 be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium and design and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA as applicable. 3) Avenue 60 (Collector): a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. The north curb face shall be located twenty-five feet (25') north of the centerline. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. Construct an 8-foot wide sidewalk The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 4) The applicant shall install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and project's main access when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 100% of the cost to design and installation of the traffic signal. Applicant shall bond for the traffic signal DIF reimbursement amount ($430,000); the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant. 5) The applicant shall design and install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58 when warrants are met. Applicant shall bond for 100% of the traffic signal DIF reimbursement amount ($430,000); the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant. The applicant is subject E:3% DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 9 of 28 to a maximum of 75% reimbursement from available funds in the City's Development Impact Fee Program for the cost to design and construct the traffic signal. The applicant shall enter into a DIF Reimbursement Agreement with the City of La Quinta for the reimbursement. 6) The applicant shall pay the fair -share amount listed below (percentage calculated in the Traffic Impact Analysis, Table 9-1) towards the design and construction of the following traffic signals. The cost to design and install a traffic signal is based on the traffic signal DIF reimbursement amount ($430,000). - Madison Street at Avenue 54 - $38,700 (90/o fair -share) - Jefferson Street at Avenue 54 - $17,200 (4% fair -share) - Monroe Street at Avenue 60 - $25,800 (60/o fair share) - Monroe Street at Avenue 58 - $47,300 (11% fair share) - Monroe Street at Airport Boulevard - $25,800 (6% fair share) - Monroe Street at Avenue 54 - $21,500 (50/o fair -share) - Monroe Street at Avenue 52 - $17,200 (40/o fair -share) B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Streets ""A" thru '"P" - Construct internal streets per the approved lay -out shown on the tentative map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited, and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&R's. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. E.*MlI DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 10 of 28 25. All gated entries shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non - accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turn -around out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of twenty-five feet width provided at the turn -around opening provided. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. The two travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 26. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Collector 4.0" a.c /5.0" c.a.b. Secondary Arterial 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 27. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The E:3301 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 11 of 28 applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 28. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. A. Madison Street (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. B. Avenue 60 (South Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. C. Avenue 58 (Westerly Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. D. Avenue 58 (Easterly Access): Right turn in and right turn out are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements out are prohibited. E. Madison Street (just south of Avenue 58): Right turn in and right turn out are permitted. Left turn in and left turn out movements out are prohibited. 29. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 30. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 31. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 32. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 12 of 28 B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking space or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 33. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 34. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six E:3%. DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 13 of 28 months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 35. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. 36. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. FINAL MAPS 37. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. The Final Map shall be 1" = 40' scale. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as 'engineer," "surveyor," and "architect,"' refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 38. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 39. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. E:3'% DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 14 of 28 A. On -Site Rough Grading Plan B. PM10 Plan C. Erosion Control Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal 1" = 40' Horizontal 1" = 40' Horizontal D. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical F. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal G. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical NOTE: E through G to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the Public Works Director. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. H. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. E-*&Z DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 15 of 28 All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "'On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and accessibility requirements. 40. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.laquintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 41. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. 01041 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 16 of 28 IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 42. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("'SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 43. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 44. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 45. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 46. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall 0111 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 17 of 28 have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 47. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20 % Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 48. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 011% DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 18 of 28 49. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 50. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 51. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 52. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("'soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. An Erosion Control Plan showing Best Management Practices prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by 01ex DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 19 of 28 soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 53. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 54. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 55. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 56. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 01101 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 20 of 28 57. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 58. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 59. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Wave Basin Project (TTM2019-0005 and SDP 2021-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 60. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 61. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 0111.7 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 21 of 28 62. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 63. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 64. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 65. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 66. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 67. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 68. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 69. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 70. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 22 of 28 LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ.. 1. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. 2. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. 3. The developer / owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of Stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 71. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 72. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 73. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. 0I1M DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 23 of 28 All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 74. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 75. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 76. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 77. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 78. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 79. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Manager for approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) as amended by the Coral Mountain Specific Plan. All freestanding lighting 0I1T. DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 24 of 28 shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. 80. All water features shall be designed to minimize "splash", and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 81. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 82. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 83. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 84. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. MAINTENANCE 85. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 86. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. 0I1M DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 25 of 28 FEES AND DEPOSITS 87. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 88. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 89. Fire Hydrants and Fire Flow: Provide water system plans to show there exists or proposed improvements of fire hydrant(s) capable of delivering the minimum fire flow, per CFC Appendix B Table B105.1 and Table B105.2 as amended by LQMC, within 400 feet to all portions around the proposed structure. Minimum fire hydrant location and spacing shall comply with the CFC and NFPA 24. Reference 2019 California Fire Code (CFC) 507.5.1. a. Transportation Hydrants: Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, fire hydrants shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 1,000 feet to provide for transportation hazards. (CFC Table C102.1 ft ntc.) 90. Tract Water Plans: If fire hydrants are required to be installed, applicant/developer shall furnish two copies of the water system fire hydrant plans to Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and shall confirm hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed and approved by the local water authority, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for review and approval. Ref. CFC 105.4.1 a. 3-feet clearance: Fire hydrants and other Fire Protection Equipment shall be provided with a minimum 3-feet radius clearance around the circumference of the device. (CFC 507.5.5, 509.2.1 & 912.4.2) Oall DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 26 of 28 91. Fire Department Access: Provide a site plan for fire apparatus access roads and signage. Access roads shall be provided to within 150 feet to all portions of all buildings and shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24-feet exclusive of curb -side parking, bike lanes and other roadway features. The construction of the access roads shall be all weather and capable of sustaining 40,000 lbs. over two axlesfor areas of residential development and 60,000 lbs. over two axels for commercial developments. Ref. CFC 503.1.1 and 503.2.1 as amended by the City of La Quinta. 92. Fire Lane marking: Identification and marking of fire lanes, including curb details and signageshall be in compliance with Riverside County Fire Department Standards. 93. Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall besubmitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Ref. CFC 503.4.1 94. Residential Escape Rescue Openings / Access There -to: Residential Dwelling Sleeping Units shall be provided Emergency Escape Rescue openings in compliance with CRC R310. Where the opening is to aside yard, the opening shall be provided with a minimum 36-inch wide court/yard and path to the public way - free from any obstructions, including equipment and vegetation. *The projects proposed 3-feet side yard setback minimum from property line may be affected by this requirement when property line fencing/wall installations are considered. The 36-inch path clearance shall be maintained. 95. Grading Permit Fire Department Review: Submittal to the Office of the Fire Marshal for Precise Grading Permit will be required. 96. Construction Permits Fire Department Review: Submittal of construction plans to the Office of the Fire Marshal for development, construction, installation and operational use permitting will be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Office of the Fire Marshal reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code, and related codes, which are in effect at the time of building plan submittal. 911 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 27 of 28 97. Phased Construction Access: If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access forfire protection prior to any construction. Ref. CFC 503.1 98. Fire Sprinkler System: All new commercial structures 3,600 square feet or larger will be required toinstall a fire sprinkler system. Ref. CFC 903.2 as amended by the City of La Quinta. 99. Residential Fire Sprinklers: Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two-family dwellingsper the California Residential Code (CRC). Plans must be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal forreview and approval prior to installation. Ref. CRC 313.2 100. Fire Alarm and Detection System: A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required and determined at time of building plan review. Ref. CFC 903.4, CFC 907.2 and NFPA 72 101. Knox Box and Gate Access: Buildings shall be provided with a Knox Box. The Knox Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. All electronically operated gates shall be provided with Knox key switches and automatic sensors for access. Ref. CFC 506.1 102. Addressing: All residential dwellings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the residence. All commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side and additional locations as required. Ref. CFC 505.1 and County of Riverside Office ofthe Fire Marshal Standard #07-01. a. Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal shall cursorily review Street and Roadway naming conventions along with preliminary parcel and unit addressing. 103. Special Event Application and Permitting: Special Events and activities requiring a specific application and permit as required by the CA Fire Code shall be separately applied for at least 60-days prior to the scheduled event. 104. Water Activity Safety and Rescue: The Developer/Operator of the Wave Basin is responsible for coordinating and providing for trained rescue 912 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005 (TTM 37805) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED: Page 28 of 28 and first aid personnel and rescue equipment for servicingthe users of the Wave Basin in compliance with any State or Local standards. 105. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Systems: Projects that do not meet the exceptions set forth bythe Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal shall provide plans for an emergency responder radio coverage system. Ref. CFC 510.1 and Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Technical Policy #TP19-002 106. Strategic Planning Review: This planning case has also been reviewed by Riverside County Fire Department Strategic Planning for the cumulative impact on the Fire Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service. *See letter provided by Deputy Fire Marshal Adria Reinertson - Dated 8/6/2021. Olt] 914 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND GOLF COURSE DISTRICTS TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, TOURIST COMMERCIAL AND PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICTS FOR ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 764-200-076, 764- 210-007, 764-210-028, 764-210-029, 766-070- 003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766-070-014, 766-080-001,766-080-002,766-080-004 & 766- 080-005 CASE NUMBER: ZONE CHANGE 2019-0004 APPLICANT: CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on June 71 2022, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing, to consider a request by CM Wave Development LLC to amend the Zoning Map to Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Tourist Commercial and Parks and Recreation Districts for Assessor's Parcel Nos. 764-200-076, 764-210-0071 764-210-028, 764-210-029, 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766- 070-0141 766-080-0011,766-080-002,766-080-004 & 766-080-005 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 27, 2022 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2022-011 to recommend to the City Council adoption of said Zone Change at a duly noticed Public Hearing on the April 26, 2022; and WHEREAS, said Zone Change has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 83-63). The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2021020310) for Environmental Assessment 2019- 0010. The City Council has adopted Resolution certifying the 915 Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2019-0004 — Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 2 of 4 Environmental Impact Report and making Findings to determine that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the significant impacts associated with aesthetics and greenhouse gas emissions, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as Exhibit A of said Resolution, detailing the findings in support of this determination; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.220.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Zone Change [Exhibit A]: 1. The zone map change is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan, as described in Exhibit B. 2. Approval of the zone map change will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare because the community will be entirely self-contained and of high quality, and will be surrounded by homes, perimeter improvements and streets. 3. The new zoning is compatible with the zoning on adjacent properties as it continues the pattern of master planned communities envisioned in the General Plan for southern areas of La Quinta. 4. The new zoning is suitable and appropriate for the subject property because the property is essentially flat, and development will not occur on Coral Mountain or protected areas. 5. Approval of the zone map change is warranted because changes in the market and in consumer interest in golf courses has changed, and alternative forms of recreation will expand the options for current and future City residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND APPROVAL: That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. 916 Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2019-0004 — Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 3 of 4 SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the permanent record of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: the City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to "Exhibit A" to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on June 6, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 917 Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2019-0004 — Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 4 of 4 LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California S-1.V, 0 ao p � I / a Q 0 0 0 � Q ° 0 Z oU ° p OQ a Q z zU z iCLULu L C W W aN O �� L U �0�� NU N Z ,� Z 0 J W 0 0 OU 0 J CJ L 0 Im 920 WA: 11.)6d-] GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS A. Land Use • Goal LU-1: Land use compatibility throughout the City. • Goal LU 2: High quality design that complements and enhances the City. • Policy LU 2.1: Changes and variations from the Zoning Ordinance in a Specific Plan will be offset by high quality design, amenities and mix of land uses. • Goal LU-5: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. • Policy LU-5.2: Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. • Goal LU-6: A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City"s residents and the region. • Policy LU-6.2: Maintain commercial development standards in the Zoning Ordinance including setbacks, height, pad elevations and other design and performance standards that assure a high quality of development. • Policy LU-6.3: Support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City"s economic base. Consistency: The site components (neighborhood commercial, low density residential, resort residential, resort hotel, resort amenities, recreational amenities, and open space) are compatible with surrounding residential, open space, and neighborhood commercial uses and designations. Lands to the north of the project and south of Avenue are designated Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential. Development of these lands would be governed by the City's zoning standards, and would consist of attached or detached single family residential developments (two to four units per acre for Low Density Residential), and medium density neighborhoods (four to eight units per acre). This development is expected to be consistent with and similar to the uses proposed within the project because the project proposes a maximum of 496 low density residential housing units on approximately 232.3 acres, as well as a maximum of 104 resort residential units, on approximately 40.5 acres, which would be similar to the density and intensity of development allowed under the General Plan. The project is separated from adjacent uses by surrounding arterial streets and physical topographic barriers, such as Coral Mountain. Off -site 921 development includes the connection to an existing Imperial Irrigation District (IID) substation to provide electricity to the project site. The off -site improvements would not impact land use of the off -site areas. The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan includes detailed design guidelines in Section 4 of the SP to guide high -quality development throughout the Specific Plan area. The project includes both neighborhood commercial and tourist commercial land uses which will generate revenue and create employment opportunities. The proposed project would increase services associated with tourism and neighborhood commercial uses. The project proposes housing of varying types and sizes with access to resort and recreational amenities, thus enhancing housing choices for potential buyers. Planning Areas II and III will offer a broad range of housing options on the site. Planning Area II, designated as Low Density Residential, anticipates detached or attached residential dwelling units with densities ranging from 0.8-4 dwelling units per acre. Planning Area III proposes the development of resort residential dwelling units with densities ranging from 2.5-2.8 dwelling units per acre. Consistent with Policy LU-5.2, Goal LU-6, and Policy LU-6.3, the implementation of the Tourist Commercial land use designation and the associated development of a recreational facility and hotel will promote the continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in La Quinta by providing resort, recreational, commercial, and residential land uses on the 386-acre property. Additionally, the residential uses will incrementally increase demand for commercial goods and services in the region, thus enhancing the economy. B. Circulation • Goal CIR-1: A transportation and circulation network that efficiently, safely and economically moves people, vehicles, and goods using facilities that meet the current demands and projected needs of the City. • Policy CIR-1.12: As a means of reducing vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City, the city shall pursue development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. • Goal CIR 2: A circulation system that promotes and enhances transit, alternative vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian networks. • Policy CIR-2.2: Encourage reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours of delay by increasing or encouraging the use of alternative modes and transportation technologies, 922 and implement and manage a hierarchy of Complete Street multimodal transportation infrastructure and programs to deliver improved mobility and reduce GHG emissions. • Policy CIR 2.3: Develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi -use paths and places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas with potential for increased pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart/NEV modes of travel. Consistency: The project proposes a private circulation system to provide safe and efficient passage for pedestrians and motorists throughout the site. The project proposes a multi -modal circulation system, aiming to decrease automobile dependency by providing transportation facilities for a variety of user groups including motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers of electric vehicles. The project proposes a private circulation system that will safely accommodate both vehicles and pedestrians with shared low -speed, low - volume internal streets. The multi -modal transportation system will consist of off-street bicycle and pedestrian paths/routes, sidewalks in higher traffic areas, enhanced pedestrian/bicycle crosswalks, pedestrian and multi -use paths and streets, traffic calming methods, short street segments with frequent caution zones and stopping points, golf cart and other alternative forms of personal transportation. C. Livable Community • Goal SC-1: A community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents. Consistency: The project includes elements to address the goal of the Livable Community Element, which is intended to assist the City in developing a more united community through resource conservation, built environment enhancement, promotion of alternative forms of transportation, and improvement of community health. The project and Specific Plan are consistent with this goal by promoting a high -quality mix of uses that will contribute to the built environment, promote walkability in the resort center of the project, and provide opportunities for active recreation. D. Economic Development • Goal ED-1: A balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. • Policy ED-1.1: The Land Use Element shall maintain a balance of land use designations to address economic needs, meet market demand, and assure a wide range of development opportunities. 923 • Goal ED 2: The continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in the City. Consistency: The project proposes a resort with up to 150 hotel keys, a water -based active recreation amenity, and resort residences that will expand tourism opportunities and promote fiscal stability. Additionally, the residential use will incrementally increase demand for commercial goods and services in the region, thus enhancing the economy. The project promotes the continued growth of the tourism and resort industries in La Quinta by providing resort, recreational, commercial, and residential land uses on the 386-acre property. E. Parks, Recreation and Trails • Goal PR-1: A comprehensive system of parks, and recreational facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. • Policy PR-1.4: The design and construction of parks and recreational facilities shall comply with all the development standards that apply to privately constructed facilities. • Policy PR-1.6: Encourage patterns of development that promote safe pedestrian and bicycle access to schools, public parks, and recreational areas. Consistency: The project designates areas set aside for recreational open space uses, as well as a water- based active recreational amenity that will provide recreational opportunities currently not available in the City. Additional open space will be scattered throughout PA II. Planning Area IV proposes approximately 23.6 acres of land zoned for Parks and Recreation (PR). This Planning Area will include active and passive recreational activities such as hiking trails, biking routes, and a ropes course/zipline. F. Housing • Goal H-1: Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. • Policy H-1.1: Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. • Goal H4: Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties. • Goal H-6: Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages 924 energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. Consistency: The project proposes the development of up to 600 attached and detached dwelling units with densities ranging from 0.8-4 dwelling units per acre, thus contributing to the City's market rate housing stock. The project will complement the surrounding residential communities. Development of resort, neighborhood commercial, recreational open space, and residential uses will add value and amenities to neighboring communities and the City. The project promotes water conservation through the use of drought tolerant plant materials and water efficient irrigation techniques. The project will comply with all City and water district regulations and building codes for water conservation, energy efficiency, and building standards. The project will also comply with all applicable green building requirements. G. Water Resources • Goal WR-1: The efficient use and conservation of the City"s water resources. • Policy WR-1.1: Support the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses. • Policy WR-1.3: Support CVWD in its efforts to expand tertiary treated (i.e., reclaimed) water distribution. Consistency: The project promotes water conservation through the use of drought tolerant plant materials and water efficient irrigation techniques. The project will comply with all City and Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) regulations and building codes for water conservation. Additionally, recycled water will be used for common area irrigation for landscaping. The Wave Basin provides a recreational amenity to support the proposed resort and residential uses, and does so with substantially less water demand than required for alternatives amenities, such as an 18-hole golf course. H. Open Space and Conservation • Goals OS-1: Preservation, conservation and management of the City"s open space lands and scenic resources for enhanced recreational, environmental, and economic purposes. • Policy OS-1.1: Identify and map lands suitable for preservation as passive and active open space. • Policy OS-1.2: Continue to develop a comprehensive multi purpose trails network to link open space areas. 925 Consistency: The project includes significant open space amenities, including the protection of Coral Mountain through an Environmentally Sensitive Area. The project incorporates connections to the public sidewalk and public trail system for convenient walking, jogging, and biking activities. Planning Area IV proposes approximately 23.6 acres of Open Space Recreation land uses, in which low -impact active and passive activities, such as hiking, biking and ropes courses are permitted. PA IV will be retained largely as natural desert land. The perimeter pedestrian improvements will connect to the surrounding community. However, the project will not connect to existing trails or open space areas, outside of the project boundary, because there are no existing public trails in the immediate vicinity of the project. I. Noise • Goal N-1: A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and resort character. • Policy N-1.1: Noise standards in the City shall be consistent with the Community Noise and Land Use Compatibility scale described in the Noise Element. • Policy N-1.2: New residential development located adjacent to any roadway identified in Table IV4 (in the Noise Element of the GP) as having a buildout noise level in excess of 65 d8A shall continue to be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. • Policy N-1.3: New non-residential development located adjacent to existing residential development, sensitive receptors or residentially designated land, shall be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates that it will not significantly impact the adjacent residential development or residential land. • Policy N-1.5: All noise impact analysis will include, at a minimum, short-term construction noise and noise generated by the daily operation of the project at build out. Consistency: The project establishes residential, resort residential, resort, recreational, and neighborhood commercial uses with compatible noise levels in an existing residential area. These uses maintain and enhance the City's residential and resort character and will be subject to the City's noise ordinance. Noise levels on Avenue 58 and Madison Street are not excessive due to the low traffic volumes, and the project will be buffered by a perimeter community wall. 926 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC RELATING TO THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0010 CASE NUMBER: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0002 APPLICANT: CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on June 7, 2022, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing, to consider a Development Agreement by and between the City of La Quinta and CM Wave Development, LLC for Assessor's Parcel Nos. 764-200-076, 764-210-007, 764-210-028, 764-210-0291 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766-070-014, 766- 080-0011766-080-0021766-080-004 & 766-080-005; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. (the "Development Agreement Law") authorizes cities to enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property, all for the purpose of strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private participation and comprehensive planning, and identifying the economic costs of such development; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 27, 2022, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2022-011 to recommend to the City Council adoption of said Development Agreement at a duly noticed Public Hearing on the April 26, 2022; and WHEREAS, said Development Agreement has complied with the requirements of "'The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 1983-63). The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2021020310) for Environmental Assessment 2019-0010. The City Council has adopted Resolution No. 927 Ordinance No. _ Development Agreement 2021-0002 - Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 2 of 4 certifying the Environmental Impact Report and making Findings to determine that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the significant impacts associated with aesthetics and greenhouse gas emissions, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as Exhibit A of said Resolution, detailing the findings in support of this determination; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.250.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Development Agreement, included to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and incorporated herewith by this reference: 1. The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan. 2. The Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in and the regulations prescribed in the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan, and implements the Specific Plan's design features. 3. The Development Agreement is in conformity with the public necessity, public convenience, general welfare and good land use practices because it will create a revenue stream to assure that public safety costs incurred by the City for the project will be paid for by the project. 4. The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare, as it provides for the long term ordered development of a master planned community. 5. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values insofar as it will ensure that development occurring on the site will generate revenues and assure high quality development. 6. The Development Agreement will have a positive fiscal impact on the city by paying mitigation fees for services it requires, and additional Transient Occupancy Tax and Sales Tax revenues. OWN Ordinance No. _ Development Agreement 2021-0002 - Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 3 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND APPROVAL: That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the permanent record of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: The City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to Exhibit A to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on June 6, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 929 Ordinance No. _ Development Agreement 2021-0002 - Project: Coral Mountain Resort Adopted: Page 4 of 4 ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 930 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Citv Clerk EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. ADOPTED: , 2022 Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use (Exempt from Recording Fee per Gov't Code §6103 and §27383) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC 931 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Development Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the _ day of , 2022 ("Reference Date"), by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation and charter city organized and existing under the Constitution of the State of the California ("City"), and CM Wave Development LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Developer"), with reference to the following: RECITALS: A. Government Code Section 65864 et seq. ("Development Agreement Act") authorizes City to enter into a binding development agreement for the development of real property within its jurisdiction with persons having legal or equitable interest in such real property. B. Pursuant to Section 65865 of the Government Code, City has adopted its Development Agreement Ordinance (La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.250.030) establishing procedures and requirements for such development agreements ("Development Agreement Ordinance"). C. Developer owns certain real property, consisting of approximately 386 acres, located south of Avenue 58, north of Avenue 60, and west of Madison Street, in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and shown on the Site Map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" (the "Site"); and Developer has proposed to develop a resort community consisting of a mix of uses including, up to 600 residential dwelling units, a boutique resort hotel with up to 150 keys and complimentary resort uses and amenities, a recreational surf facility, up to 57,000 square feet of tourist commercial uses, up to 60,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial uses, and approximately 23.6 acres of additional open space and recreational amenities (collectively, the "Project"). The Project is more fully described in, and subject to (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan, also known as Specific Plan No. SP2020-0002 ("Specific Plan"); (iii) the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, approved and certified by the City Council on , by City Council Resolution No. (the " EIR"); (iv) General Plan Amendment No. GPA 2019- 0002; (v) Zone Change No. ZC 2019-0004; (vi) Specific Plan Amendment to SP 03-067 (to remove the Site from that Specific Plan); (vii) Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 2019-0005; Site Development Permit No. SDP 2021-0001; and (viii) any future discretionary or ministerial approvals and/or permits issued for the Project (collectively, the "Project Site Development Permits"); (ix) any future subdivision maps approved for the Project (collectively, the "Future Tract Maps"); and (x) the conditions of approval associated with each and all of the foregoing approvals (collectively, the "Conditions of Approval"). The documents, permits, approvals, and conditions described in the foregoing clauses (i)-(x) are collectively referred to herein as the "Project Approvals," and are, or when approved or issued shall be, on file with the City Clerk. D. Developer owns fee simple title to the Site, and by their execution of this Agreement, City and Developer consent to recordation of this Agreement against the Site. E. Consistent with Section 9.250.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, City and Developer desire to enter into a binding agreement that shall be construed as a development -1- 932 agreement within the meaning of the Development Agreement Act. This Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning for and secure the orderly development of the Project, ensure a desirable and functional community environment, provide effective and efficient development of public facilities, infrastructure, and services appropriate for the development of the Project, and assure attainment of the maximum effective utilization of resources within the City, by achieving the goals and purposes of the Development Agreement Act. In exchange for these benefits to City, Developer desires to receive the assurance that it may proceed with development of the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Project Approvals, all as more particularly set forth herein. F. The Planning Commission and the City Council have determined that the Project and this Agreement are consistent with the City's General Plan and the Specific Plan, including the goals and objectives thereof. G. All actions taken by City have been duly taken in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) ("CEQA"), and all other requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes and other procedural matters. H. On , 2021, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. approving this Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties do hereby agree as follows: CrFNFR A T , 1.1 Definitions 1.1.1 "Administrative Adjustment" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2.10 of this Agreement. 1.1.2 "Affiliated Party" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.8.3 of this Agreement. 1.1.3 "Agreement" means this Development Agreement and all amendments and modifications thereto. 1.1.4 "Annual Mitigation Payment Date" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.6.1 of this Agreement. 1.1.5 "Applicable Rules" means the rules, regulations, ordinances and officially adopted policies of the City of La Quinta in full force and effect as of the Effective Date of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the -2- 933 Specific Plan. Additionally, notwithstanding the language of this Section or any other language in this Agreement, all specifications, standards and policies regarding the design and construction of public works facilities, if any, shall be those that are in effect at the time the Project plans are being processed for approval and/or under construction. 1.1.6 "Assignment and Assumption Agreement' shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.8.1 of this Agreement. 1.1.7 "CC&Rs" means the Declaration(s) of Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions, recorded against all or a portion of the Site, as set forth in Section 3.8 of this Agreement. 1.1.8 "CDFW" means the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, a state agency. 1.1.9 "CEQA" means the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code of Regs., Title 14, Sections 15000 et seq.). 1.1.10 "City" means the City of La Quinta, a charter city and municipal corporation, including each and every agency, department, board, commission, authority, employee, and/or official acting under the authority of the City, including without limitation the City Council and the Planning Commission. 1.1.11 "City Council" means the City Council of the City and the legislative body of the City pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867. 1.1.12 "Conditions of Approval" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital C. 1.1.13 "Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.6.2 of this Agreement. The Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee may also be referred to as the "Coral Mountain Residential Unit Fee". 1.1.14 "CVMSHCP" means the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program, as described in the EIR and as approved by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife with issuance of a Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) Permit on September 9, 2008, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service with the issuance of the final permit on October 1, 2008, for the CVMSHCP. 1.1.15 "Development Director" means the Design and Development Director for the City or designee. 1.1.16 "Developer" has the same meaning as in the preamble to this Agreement. 1.1.17 "Development Agreement Act' means Section 65864 et seq., of the California Government Code. 1.1.18 "Discretionary Action" means an action which requires the exercise of judgment, deliberation or a decision on the part of City, including any board, commission, -3- 934 committee, or department or any officer or employee thereof, in the process of approving or disapproving a particular activity, as distinguished from an activity which merely requires City, including any board, commission or department or any officer or employee thereof, to determine whether there has been compliance with statutes, ordinances, regulations, or other adopted policies. 1.1.19 "Discretionary Permits" means any permits, approvals, plans, Future Tract Maps, inspections, certificates, documents, and licenses that require a Discretionary Action, including, without limitation, site development permits, grading permits, stockpile permits, and encroachment permits. 1.1.20 "Effective Date" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.3 of this Agreement. 1.1.21 "Environmental Impact Report' or "EIR" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital C of this Agreement. Agreement. 1.1.22 "Finance District' shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.4 of this 1.1.23 "Future Tract Maps" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital C. 1.1.24 "General Plan" means the General Plan of the City. 1.1.25 "Impact Fees" means impact fees, linkage fees, exactions, assessments or fair share charges or other similar impact fees or charges imposed on and in connection with new development by City. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, none of the following shall constitute Impact Fees: (i) Processing Fees, (ii) impact fees, linkage fees, exactions, assessments or fair share charges or other similar fees or charges imposed by other governmental entities and which City is required to collect or assess pursuant to applicable law, including, without limitation, school district impact fees pursuant to Government Code Section 65995, fees required pursuant to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee, or (c) other City-wide fees or charges of general applicability, provided that such City-wide fees or charges are not imposed as an impact fee on new development. 1.1.26 "Insubstantial Modification" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6(a) of this Agreement. 1.1.27 "Ministerial Permits and Approvals" means the permits, approvals, plans, inspections, certificates, documents, licenses, and all other actions required to be taken by City in order for Developer to implement, develop and construct the Project and the Mitigation Measures, including without limitation, building permits, foundation permits, and other similar permits and approvals which are required by the La Quinta Municipal Code and Project plans and other actions required by the Project Approvals to implement the Project and the Mitigation Measures. Ministerial Permits and Approvals shall not include any Discretionary Actions or Discretionary Permits. 51 935 1.1.28 "Mitigation Measures" means the mitigation measures described in the EIR and in the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved and adopted for the Project. 1.1.29 "New Laws" means amendments or modifications to the Applicable Rules, and all ordinances, resolutions, initiatives, regulations, rules, laws, plans, policies, and guidelines of the City and its City Council, Planning Commission, and all other City boards, commissions, departments, agencies, and committees enacted or adopted after the Effective Date. 1.1.30 "Non -Assuming Transferee" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.8.2 of this Agreement. 1.1.31 "One -Time Mitigation Fee" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.6.1 of this Agreement. 1.1.32 "Operative Year" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.6.2 of this Agreement. 1.1.33 "Parties" means collectively Developer and City. Each shall be referred to in the singular as a "Party". 1.1.34 "Planning Area" shall mean an area designated on the Site Map as a planning area. 1.1.35 "Planning Commission" means the City Planning Commission and the planning agency of the City pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867. 1.1.36 "Processing Fees" means all processing fees and charges required by City to cover the City's cost of processing permits and other land use entitlements and conducing the associated inspections, including, but not limited to, fees for filing land use applications, plan check fees, inspection fees, and other processing or administrative fees. Processing Fees shall not include Impact Fees. The amount of the Processing Fees to be applied in connection with the development of the Project shall be the amount which is in effect on a City-wide basis at the time an application for the City action is made. Notwithstanding the language of this Section or any other language in this Agreement, Developer shall not be exempt from the payment of fees, if any, imposed on a City-wide basis as part of City's program for storm water pollution abatement mandated by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 and subsequent amendments thereto, unless a waiver of these fees is provided by City in a subsequent agreement. 1.1.37 "Project" means development of the Site as set forth in more detail in Section 3.1. 1.1.38 "Project Approvals" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital C. 1.1.39 "Public Facilities" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.4 of this Agreement. 1.1.40 "Reserved Powers" means the rights and authority excepted from this Agreement's restrictions on City's police powers and which are instead reserved to City, its City -5- 936 Council, Planning Commission, and all other City boards, commissions, departments, agencies, and committees. The Reserved Powers include the powers to enact or adopt New Laws or take future Discretionary Actions after the Effective Date of this Agreement that may be in conflict with the Applicable Rules and Project Approvals, except such New Laws which would prevent, or materially impair Developer's ability to develop the Project in accordance with the Project Approvals; provided, however, that with respect to such New Laws which would conflict with this Agreement or prevent, or materially impair Developer's ability to develop the Project in accordance with the Project Approvals, such New Laws shall apply to the Project only if such New Laws are: (1) necessary to protect the public health and safety, and are generally applicable on a City-wide basis (except in the event of natural disasters as found by the City Council such as floods, earthquakes and similar acts of God, which shall apply even if not applicable on a City- wide basis); (2) amendments to Uniform Codes, as adopted by City, and/or the La Quinta Municipal Code, as applicable, regarding the construction, engineering and design standards for private and public improvements to be constructed on the Site; (3) required by a non -City governmental entity to be adopted by or applied by the City (or, if adoption is optional, the failure to adopt or apply such non -City law or regulation would cause the City to sustain a significant loss of funds or loss of access to significant funding or other resources), or (4) necessary to comply with state or federal laws and regulations (whether enacted previous or subsequent to the Effective Date of this Agreement). 1.1.41 "Schedule of Performance" means the schedule for the development of the Project as set forth in Exhibit "H" attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. 1.1.42 "Short -Term Vacation Rentals Regulations" means Chapter 3.25 (or successor chapter) of the La Quinta Municipal Code that governs the application, permitting, renewal, use, operation, penalties, and other provisions relating to short-term vacation rentals in the City, in effect at the time during the Term of this Agreement, except to the extent any provision in Chapter 3.25 directly conflicts with the rights vested as set forth in Section 5 of this Agreement. 1.1.43 "Site" means approximately 386 acres of real property located south of Avenue 58, north of Avenue 60, and west of Madison Street, in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California. The Site is legally described in the Site Legal Description and depicted in the Site Map., attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively. 1.1.44 "Site Development Plan" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9.180.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 1.1.45 "Site Legal Description" shall mean the legal description of the Site as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.1.46 "Site Map" means the map of the Site and immediately adjacent properties, which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.1.47 "Specific Plan" shall have the meaning as set forth in Recital C. 1.1.48 "Term" means the period of time for which the Agreement shall be effective in accordance with Section 1.2 herein. -6- 937 1.1.49 "TOT" means Transient Occupancy Tax levied by the City, in accordance with Chapter 3.24 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and applicable state law, and deposited into the City's general fund after remittance by all operators (or other entities or individuals) subject to the tax. 1.1.50 "Transferee" means individually or collectively, Developer's successors in interest, assignees or transferees of all or any portion of the Site. 1.1.51 "Uniform Codes" means those building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire and other similar regulations of a City-wide scope which are based on recommendations of a multi -state professional organization and become applicable throughout the City, such as, but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform Electrical Code, the Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, or the Uniform Fire Code (including those amendments to the promulgated uniform codes which reflect local modification to implement the published recommendations of the multi -state organization and which are applicable City-wide). 1.1.52 "Zoning Ordinance" means Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for fifty (50) years thereafter, unless said term is otherwise terminated, modified, or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement or by mutual consent of the Parties after the satisfaction of all applicable public hearing and related procedural requirements. 1.3 Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective, and the obligations of the Parties hereunder shall be effective, as of ("Effective Date"), which is the date that Ordinance No. takes effect. 1.4 Statement of Benefits and Consideration. The Parties have determined that a development agreement is appropriate for the construction and operation of the Project due to the substantial benefits to be derived therefrom. City finds and determines that the Project is in the best interests of the health, safety and general welfare of City and its residents, and that entering into this Agreement constitutes a valid, present exercise of its police power. City has undertaken the necessary proceedings, has found and determined that this Agreement is consistent with the General Plan, and has adopted Ordinance No. approving this Agreement. As a result of the development of the Project in accordance with this Agreement, City will receive substantial benefits. In consideration of the substantial benefits, commitments, and consideration to be provided by Developer pursuant to this Agreement, and in order to strengthen the public planning process and reduce the economic costs of development, City hereby provides Developer assurance that Developer can proceed with the construction and operation of the Project for the Term of this Agreement pursuant to the Applicable Rules and this Agreement. Developer would not enter into -7- this Agreement or agree to provide the public benefits, commitments and consideration described in this Agreement if it were not for the certainty provided by this Agreement that the Project can be constructed and operated during the Term of this Agreement in accordance with the Applicable Rules and this Agreement. 1.5 City CEQA Findings. City finds that review of the environmental impacts of this Agreement, and the Project as a whole, has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State and local guidelines adopted thereunder, and City has given consideration to such environmental review prior to its approval of this Agreement and the Project, and has undertaken all actions necessary to comply with CEQA. 1.6 Modification or Amendment of this Agreement. Except as expressly stated to the contrary herein, this Agreement may be modified or amended from time to time, in whole or in part, only by mutual written consent of the Parties or their successors in interest, consistent with Government Code Section 65867-65868, the City's Development Agreement Ordinance, and the following terms: (a) Insubstantial Modifications. The Parties acknowledge that refinements and further development of the Project may demonstrate that minor changes are appropriate with respect to the details of the Project development and the performance of the parties under this Agreement. The parties desire to retain a certain degree of flexibility with respect to the details of the Project development and with respect to those items covered in general terms under this Agreement, and thus desire to provide a streamlined method of approving insubstantial modifications to this Agreement. Therefore, any minor modification to this Agreement which does not modify (i) the Term of this Agreement; (ii) permitted uses of the Site, (iii) maximum density or intensity of use, except as specifically allowed in the Specific Plan, (iv) provisions for the reservation or dedication of land, (v) conditions, terms, restrictions or requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, or (vi) monetary obligations of Developer (hereinafter an "Insubstantial Modification"), and that can be processed under CEQA as exempt from CEQA, or with the preparation of an Addendum to the EIR, shall not require a public hearing prior to the parties executing a modification to this Agreement. Either Party may propose an Insubstantial Modification, consent to which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed by the other Party. Upon the written request of Developer for a modification to this Agreement, the City Manager or designee shall determine, in the City Manager's sole discretion but not to be unreasonably withheld: (1) whether the requested modification constitutes an "Insubstantial Modification," as defined herein; (2) whether the requested modification is consistent with Applicable Rules (other than that portion of this Agreement sought to be modified); and (3) whether the requested modification tends to promote the goals of this Agreement. If the City Manager or designee determines that the requested modification is an "Insubstantial Modification" that is consistent with Applicable Rules and tends to promote the goals of this Agreement, the proposed modification will be approved by the City as an Insubstantial Modification, and a written modification will be executed by the Parties and attached to this Agreement. Any such Insubstantial Modification shall not be deemed an "amendment" to this Agreement under Government Code Section 65858. WE 939 (b) Substantial Amendments. Except as otherwise described in Section 1.6(a) of this Agreement, amendments to this Agreement shall be "Substantial Amendments" which require notice and a public hearing pursuant to California Government Code Section 65868. (c) Amendment Exemptions. City approval of (1) administrative adjustments to a Project Approval, as defined in Section 2.2.10 of this Agreement, in conformity with Applicable Rules and this Agreement, shall not require a modification or amendment to this Agreement and shall automatically be deemed to be incorporated into the Project and vested under this Agreement. Likewise, City approval of any minor amendments or modifications to any Exhibit to this Agreement shall not require a modification or amendment to this Agreement and shall automatically be deemed to be incorporated into this Agreement and vested hereunder. (d) Parties Required to Amend. Where a portion of Developer's rights or obligations have been transferred, assigned, and assumed pursuant to Section 1.8 of this Agreement, the signature of the person or entity to whom such rights or obligations have been assigned shall not be required to amend this Agreement unless such amendment would materially alter the rights or obligations of such assignee/transferee hereunder. In no event shall the signature or consent of any Non -Assuming Transferee be required to amend this Agreement. 1.6.1 Effect of Amendment. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be operative only as to those specific portions of this Agreement expressly subject to the amendment, and all other terms and conditions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without interruption. 1.7 Termination. Unless terminated earlier, pursuant to the terms hereof, this Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further effect upon the expiration of the Term of this Agreement as set forth in Section 1.2. Termination of this Agreement, for any reason, shall not, by itself, affect any right or duty arising from entitlements or approvals set forth under the Project Approvals. As to any specific lot containing a residential dwelling within the Project, this Agreement shall terminate as to such lot upon the issuance by the City of a certificate of occupancy for the dwelling and the close of escrow of the initial sale of that dwelling. 1.8 Assignment of Interests, Rights and Obligations. Developer may transfer or assign all or any portion of its interests, rights or obligations under the Project Approvals to third parties acquiring an interest or estate in the Site, or any portion thereof, including, without limitation, purchasers or ground lessee(s) of lots, parcels or facilities, subject to the following: 1.8.1 Assignment and Assumption Agreements. (a) In connection with the transfer or assignment by Developer of all or any portion of the Site (other than a transfer or assignment by Developer to an affiliated party, a "Mortgagee", or a "Non -Assuming Transferee" (as defined in Section 1.8.2 below)), Developer .,R and the transferee shall enter into a written agreement (an "Assignment and Assumption Agreement") regarding the respective interests, rights and obligations of Developer and the transferee in and under the Project Approvals. Such Assignment and Assumption Agreement may: (i) release Developer from obligations under the Project Approvals (including this Agreement) pertaining to that portion of the Site being transferred, as described in the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, provided that the transferee expressly assumes such obligations; (ii) transfer to the transferee vested rights to improve that portion of the Site being transferred; and (iii) address any other matter deemed by Developer to be necessary or appropriate in connection with the transfer or assignment. (b) Except as provided in Section 1.8.2 of this Agreement, Developer shall obtain City's prior written consent to any Assignment and Assumption Agreement, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. City may refuse to give its consent only if, in light of the proposed transferee's reputation and financial resources, such transferee would not in City's reasonable opinion be able to perform the obligations proposed to be assumed by such transferee. Such determination shall be made by the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney and is appealable by Developer directly to the City Council. (c) An Assignment and Assumption Agreement shall be binding on Developer, City and the transferee provided (i) Developer is not then in default under this Agreement, (ii) Developer has provided notice to City of such transfer, and City has approved the transfer, and (iii) the transferee executes and delivers to City a written agreement in which (a) the name and address of the transferee is set forth and (b) the transferee expressly and unconditionally assumes each and every obligation of Developer under this Agreement with respect to the Site, or portion thereof, being transferred (to the extent Developer has not retained a continuing obligation), (c) Developer no longer has any legal or equitable interest in the Site or the portion thereof sold or transferred, as applicable, and (d) City has satisfied itself of transferee's ability to assume those Developer obligations under this Agreement being assigned. Upon recordation of any Assignment and Assumption Agreement in the Official Records of Riverside County, Developer shall automatically be released from those obligations assumed by the transferee therein. (d) Developer shall be free from any and all liabilities accruing on or after the date of any assignment or transfer with respect to those obligations assumed by a transferee pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement. No breach or default hereunder by any person succeeding to any portion of Developer's obligations under this Agreement shall be attributed to Developer, nor may Developer's rights hereunder be canceled or diminished in any way by any breach or default by any such person following Developer's release of obligations under the Project Approvals pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement assigning Developer's obligations to that successor. (e) Provided any assignment is consistent with the Development Agreement Act and Development Agreement Ordinance, the City may assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement with the approval of the Developer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. -10- 941 1.8.2 Non -Assuming Transferees. Except as otherwise required by Developer, in Developer's sole discretion, the burdens, obligations and duties of Developer under this Agreement shall terminate with respect to: (i) any single residential parcel conveyed to a purchaser, or (ii) any property that has been established as one or more separate legal parcels and conveyed for open space, park, or similar nonresidential/noncommercial uses. Neither an Assignment and Assumption Agreement nor City's consent shall be required in connection with subsections (i) and (ii) above as long as Developer continues to assume obligations with respect to the portion that is transferred, or can otherwise demonstrate bonds and/or other financial security will satisfy these obligations, and in such case the transferee in such a transaction and its successors ("Non -Assuming Transferees") shall be deemed to have no obligations under this Agreement (except for obligations which extend to the individual units, single residential parcels, and any other parcels or property subject to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R) provisions which implement this Agreement) but shall continue to benefit from the vested rights provided by this Agreement until this Agreement is terminated with respect to that parcel under Section 1.7 of this Agreement. Nothing in this section shall exempt any property transferred to a Non -Assuming Transferee from payment of applicable fees and assessments or compliance with applicable conditions of approval. 1.8.3 Transfers to Affiliated Parties. Developer, or any "Affiliated Party" of Developer, may at any time and without City's prior written consent, transfer all or any portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any "Affiliated Party" of such Transferor and, in connection with the transfer of any such obligations, be released from such obligations; provided, however, that Developer and the Affiliated Party duly execute (in recordable form) an Assignment and Assumption Agreement in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and Developer deliver said agreement to the City to ensure, among other terms and conditions, the City has the current address and notice information for any Affiliated Party that assumes all or any portion of Developer's rights and obligations under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Affiliated Party" shall mean any entity that owns fifty-one percent (51%) or a controlling interest in Developer. The City shall have the right to request and review any and all articles of incorporation, bylaws, operating agreements, and other related governing documents of any Affiliated Party to confirm compliance with the requirements of this Section 1.8.3. 2. AGREEMENTS AND ASSURANCES 2.1 Agreement and Assurance on the Part of Developer. In consideration for City entering into this Agreement, and as an inducement for City to obligate itself to carry out the covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, and in order to effectuate the premises, purposes and intentions set forth in the Recitals of this Agreement, Developer hereby agrees that the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including the Project Approvals incorporated herein, shall govern development and operation of the Site for the Term of this Agreement. -11- 942 2.2 Agreement and Assurances on the Part of the City. In consideration for Developer entering into this Agreement, and as an inducement for Developer to obligate itself to carry out the covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, and in order to effectuate the premises, purposes and intentions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby agrees as follows: 2.2.1 Vested Entitlement to Develop. Developer has the vested right to develop the Project subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Applicable Rules, Project Approvals and the Reserved Powers. It is the intent of City and Developer that the vesting of development rights of Developer shall include the permitted land uses, densities, and intensities of use of the Site, timing or phasing of development, zoning, provisions for the reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the location and size of public improvements, as well as those other terms and conditions of development of the Project as set forth in this Agreement and the other Project Approvals. Developer's vested rights under this Agreement shall also include, without limitation, the right to remodel, renovate, rehabilitate, rebuild or replace all improvements within the Project or any portion thereof throughout the applicable Tenn for any reason, including, without limitation, in the event of damage, destruction or obsolescence of the existing development or the Project or any portion thereof, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Applicable Rules, Project Approvals and the Reserved Powers. Such vesting shall expire upon the earlier of the following occurrences: (a) termination of this Agreement; (b) an uncured material default by Developer of this Agreement; or (c) as to a particular phase, parcel, or lot comprising a portion of the Site, the earlier of the final approved City inspection of the completed development on such phase, parcel, or lot, or the issuance by the City of a certificate of occupancy for such phase, parcel, or lot. Except for the expiration set forth in clause (a) of the preceding sentence, the expiration of the vesting right set forth in the preceding sentence shall not terminate the obligations of Developer under this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the Project shall remain subject to the following, to the same extent they would apply without this Agreement: (1) all Applicable Rules; (ii) all New Laws applied to Developer through the City's Reserved Powers; (iii) all subsequent development approvals and the conditions of approval associated therewith, including but not limited to any further site development permits, tract maps, and building permits; and (iv) the payment of all applicable fees in effect on the Effective Date in the categories and in the amounts as required at the time such fees are due and payable, which may be at the time of issuance of building permits, or otherwise as specified by applicable law, as existing at the time such fees are due and payable. -12- 943 2.2.2 Changes in Applicable Rules. (A) Nonapplication of Changes in Applicable Rules. Any change in, or addition to, the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, any change in the General Plan or Specific Plan, zoning or building regulation, adopted or becoming effective after the Effective Date, including, without limitation, any such change by means of ordinance, City Charter amendment, initiative, referendum, resolution, motion, policy, order or moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever and adopted by the City, City Council, Planning Commission or any other board, commission, department or agency of the City, or any officer or employee thereof, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Site and/or to the Project and which would conflict in any way with the Applicable Rules, Project Approvals, or this Agreement, or in any way reduce the development rights or assurances provided by this Agreement, shall not be applied to the Site or the Project unless such changes represent an exercise of City's Reserved Powers, or are otherwise agreed to in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Developer may, in its sole discretion, consent to the application to the Project of any change in the Applicable Rules. (B) Changes in Uniform Codes. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, development of the Project shall be subject to changes which may occur from time to time in the Uniform Codes, as such Codes are adopted by the City of La Quinta. (C) Changes Mandated by Federal or State Law. This Agreement shall not preclude the application to the Project of changes in, or additions to, the Applicable Rules, including rules, regulations, ordinances and official policies, to the extent that such changes or additions are mandated to be applied to developments such as this Project by state or federal regulations, pursuant to the Reserved Powers. In the event state or federal laws or regulations prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, such provisions shall be modified or suspended only to the extent necessary to comply with such state or federal laws or regulations. 2.2.3 Subsequent Development Review. Nothing set forth herein shall impair or interfere with the right of City to require the processing of building permits as required by law pursuant to the applicable provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code and the provisions of Uniform Codes. 2.2.4 Effective Development Standards. City agrees that it is bound to permit the uses, intensities of use, and densities of development on the Site which are permitted by this Agreement and the Project Approvals, insofar as this Agreement and the Project Approvals so provide or as otherwise set forth in the Applicable Rules. City hereby agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold or unreasonably condition any approvals and/or permits which must be issued by City in order for the Project to proceed, provided that Developer reasonably and satisfactorily complies with all City-wide standard procedures for -13- processing applications for such approvals and/or permits. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to require the City to issue a permit or approval that is inconsistent with the Applicable Rules. 2.2.5 Moratoria or Interim Control Ordinances. In the event an ordinance, resolution, policy, or other measure is enacted, whether by action of City, by initiative, or otherwise, which relates directly or indirectly to the Project or to the rate, amount, timing, sequencing, or phasing of the development or construction of the Project on all or any part of the Site, or the use of the Site (or any portion thereof) as authorized by this Agreement, or the implementation of the Mitigation Measures adopted in connection with approval of the Project, City agrees that such ordinance, resolution or other measure shall not apply to the Site, the Project or this Agreement, unless such changes are lawfully adopted pursuant to the Reserved Powers and do not conflict with any provisions of this Agreement. 2.2.6 Reserved. 2.2.7 Impact Fees. Notwithstanding any provisions in this Agreement regarding the type, amounts, and rates of Impact Fees to the contrary, the Impact Fees imposed by City with respect to the Project shall be only those Impact Fees in full force and effect as of the Effective Date, in the amounts/rate in effect at the time such fees are paid. 2.2.8 Timeframes and Staffing for Processing and Review. City agrees that expeditious processing of Ministerial Permits and Approvals and Discretionary Actions, if any, and any other approvals or actions required for the Project are critical to the implementation of the Project. In recognition of the importance of timely processing and review of Ministerial Permits and Approvals and Discretionary Actions, City agrees to reasonably cooperate with Developer to establish time frames for processing and reviewing such Ministerial Permits and Approvals and Discretionary Actions and to comply with any timeframes established in the Project Approvals. City further agrees to timely process and approve all Ministerial Permits and Approvals, so long as they are consistent with the terms of this Agreement, the Applicable Rules, and the Project Approvals, and agrees to exercise its discretion concerning Discretionary Actions in manner that is consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2.2.9 Extension of Tentative Maps. In accordance with Government Code Section 66452.6(a)(1), all tentative subdivision maps and tentative parcel maps, whether vesting or not, which may be approved by the City in connection with the development of the Project, shall be extended for the greater period of (a) twenty (20) years or (b) such maximum total time as is permitted in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Sections 66410 et seq.) or Applicable Rules. -14- 945 2.2.10 Project Approval Adjustments. To the extent permitted by state and federal law, any Project Approval may, from time to time, be amended or modified in the following manner: (a) Administrative Adjustments. Upon the written request of Developer for a modification to a Project Approval (other than this Agreement), the Development Director or designee, in consultation with the City Engineer, shall determine: (i) whether the requested modification is minor when considered in light of the Project as a whole, and (ii) whether the requested modification is consistent with Applicable Rules (other than that portion of the Applicable Rules sought to be amended). If the Development Director or designee, in consultation with the City Engineer, determines, in his/her reasonable judgment, that the proposed modification is both minor and consistent with Applicable Rules (other than that portion of a Project Approval sought to be amended), the modification shall be determined to be an "Administrative Adjustment" and the Development Director or designee, in consultation with the City Engineer, may, except to the extent otherwise required by state or federal law, approve the Administrative Adjustment without notice and public hearing. For the purpose of this Section 2.2.10, and by way of example only, site plan review, architectural review, lotting pattern changes, changes in pedestrian paths, tentative subdivision map amendments (including lotting patterns and street alignments) which are minor and will not have a substantial or material impact on traffic circulation as described for each such area in the Specific Plan, substitutions of comparable landscaping for any landscaping shown on a landscape plan, minor variations in the location of lots or homesites that do not substantially alter the design concepts of the Project, final locations of floating park sites, floating public facility sites, and minor variations in the location or installation of utilities and other infrastructure connections or facilities that do not substantially alter the design concepts of the Project, may be treated as Administrative Adjustments by the Development Director and the City Engineer. (b) Non -Administrative Amendments. Any request of Developer for a modification to a Project Approval (other than this Agreement), which is not approved as an Administrative Adjustment as set forth above, shall be subject to review, consideration, and action pursuant to Applicable Rules. 3. DEVELOPER'S OBLIGATIONS 3.1 Development of the Project; Planned Development. Developer shall construct the Project on the Site only in accordance with the Project Approvals. As depicted in the Project Approvals, as the same may be updated or amended from time to time consistent with the terms hereof, the Project shall consist of a mixed -use resort development with the following components: (A) Up to 60,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial development with associated parking, circulation and landscaping improvements on approximately 7.7 acres in "Planning Area I"; -15- (B) Up to 496 single-family residential dwellings and related recreational and open space amenities and infrastructure improvements on approximately 232.3 acres in "Planning Area II' ; (C) Tourist commercial and resort residential uses on approximately 120.8 acres in "Planning Area III", consisting of boutique resort hotel with up to 150 keys, 57,000 square feet of tourist commercial resort amenities in a walkable village, up to 104 resort residential dwellings, an approximately 16-acre artificial Wave Basin, a private clubhouse and related amenities adjacent to the Wave Basin, as well as other open space, recreational amenities, and related facilities and infrastructure improvements; (D) An additional 23.6 acres of natural open space with low -impact active and passive recreational amenities in "Planning Area IV"; and (E) Allowance of short-term vacation rentals pursuant to Article 5 of this Agreement. Developer shall develop the Project in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, as that schedule may be modified pursuant to mutual written agreement of the parties or extended pursuant to Section 8.2 of this Agreement. If any item of performance is not completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, then following the notice and cure periods set forth in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of this Agreement, the City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement as to the specific portion of the Project that has not been completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, subject to the procedures described in Section 6.3 of this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Section 3.1, Developer is not obligated to affirmatively act to develop all or any portion of the Site, pay any sums of money, dedicate any land, indemnify any party (save and except Developer's obligation to indemnify the City for all costs associated with any legal challenge to this Agreement or the Project Approvals), or to otherwise meet or perform any obligation with respect to the Site, except and only as a condition to the development of the Project. When Developer develops any portion of the Site, Developer shall comply with the terms of this Agreement, the Applicable Rules, and the Project Approvals governing development of the Site or any portion thereof. 3.2 Compliance with Government Code Section 66473.7 Developer shall comply with the provisions of Government Code section 66473.7 with respect to any Tract Maps prepared for the Project. 3.3 Project Design Features Referenced in EIR. As a condition of development, Developer shall incorporate into the Project all project design features identified in the EIR and included as part of the "project" evaluated in the EIR and its technical studies, as specifically identified in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. Developer's compliance with this provision is a contractual commitment that is enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. -16- 947 3.4 Mitigation Monitoring Program. As a condition of development, the Developer shall also comply with the mitigation monitoring program set forth in Exhibit "D" attached hereto (the "Mitigation Monitoring Program"), and Developer's compliance with this provision is a contractual commitment that is enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 3.5 Conditions of Approval. As a condition of development, the Developer shall also comply with the conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit "E," and Developer's compliance with this provision is a contractual commitment that is enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Developer acknowledges that additional conditions of approval beyond those set forth in Exhibit "E" may be applicable to the Project if and as associated with future Project approvals, to the extent such additional conditions of approval are consistent with the terms of this Agreement. 3.5.1 CVMSHCP Compliance. (A) Notwithstanding any provisions in this Agreement to the contrary, the following terms and conditions in furtherance of CVMSHCP compliance shall apply: The Project shall comply with all provisions of the CVMSHCP Guidelines for all areas adjacent to Coral Mountain or any other Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") open space as shown on Figure 13 in the Specific Plan; (B) The development of the Project and use of the Site (and each applicable Planning Area on the Site) shall fully comply with all CVMSHCP Land Use Adjacency Guidelines, even though no portion of the Project or the Site is in or adjacent to any CVMSHCP conservation area, as set forth in more detail in Section 2.5 of the Specific Plan. Without limiting the obligation to comply with the CVMSHCP Land Use Adjacency Guidelines, the following terms and conditions apply to the development of the Project and use of the Site: (i) There shall be no planting of invasive, non-native plant species in and adjacent to CVMSHCP conservation areas as shown on Figure 13 of the Specific Plan; and (ii) The Project shall follow the recommended and prohibited species as noted in Tables 4-112 and 4-113 of the CVMSHCP Land Use Adjacency Guidelines, as set forth in Table 3 of the Specific Plan ("Plant Material Palette"). (C) To further the CVMSHCP Land Use Adjacency Guidelines requirement for the incorporation of barriers to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, illegal trespass, and dumping in a CVMSHCP conservation area, there shall be a protective barrier that complies with the requirements for Peninsular Bighorn Sheep ("PBS") barriers along the western boundary, covering all areas adjacent to Coral Mountain and other BLM open space property, as set forth in more detail in Section 2.5 of the Specific Plan. The protective sheep barrier shall be at least eight (8) feet high, with the final design and location subject to City approval in consultation with CDFW. All recreational infrastructure and activities, including but not limited to the planned on -site portion of the regional trail connection which Desert Recreation District intends to construct in the vicinity of the Project, shall be located on the development -side and not on the BLM side of the protective sheep barrier. -17- .,; 3.5.2 CC&Rs Incorporating CVMSHCP Compliance. The CVMSHCP compliance requirements set forth in Section 3.5.1 of this Agreement shall be incorporated into the CC&Rs for the Project and the Site, which shall be recorded against the Site as provided for in Section 3.8 of this Agreement, and shall be enforceable in perpetuity for the life of the Project and use of the Site. 3.6 Payment of Fees. During the Term of this Agreement, Developer shall timely pay all Processing Fees and Impact Fees with respect to the Project as specified in this Agreement. 3.6.1 Developer's Payments of One -Time Mitigation Fees. As a further public benefit of the Project, including to help pay for the City's public safety and public infrastructure costs, Developer shall pay or cause to be paid to the City, for each of the up to 496 single-family residential units in Planning Area II of the Project, the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per unit, with such payment due upon the first close of escrow for each such unit (the "One -Time Mitigation Fee"). 3.6.2 Annual Mitigation Fee; Potential Cessation of Annual Fee. To ensure that the Project generates sufficient TOT and sales tax revenues to the City to pay all public safety and other public service costs of the City resulting from the Project, during the term of this Agreement, on each July 1st following the Effective Date ("Annual Mitigation Payment Date"), the Developer or the Developer's successor shall pay to the City an annual mitigation fee ("Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee") covering the annual period of the prior July 1 through the June 30 occurring immediately preceding the Annual Mitigation Payment Date (the "Operative Year") (provided, however, the first Operative Year shall commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement and end on the next occurring June 30). The Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee shall be comprised of the following: The collective sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) for each of the 600 allowed residential units (also referred to as the "Coral Mountain Residential Unit Fee") in the Project that has received a certificate of occupancy, and that has been sold to a third party purchaser as evidenced by a recorded grant deed for such unit, prior to the applicable Annual Mitigation Payment Date, regardless of when or in which Operative Year the unit was sold. Notwithstanding the two paragraphs above, if the City has received TOT for rentals from the Project (which includes TOT from both hotel rooms from the boutique resort hotel in Planning Area III and any and all residential units) in excess of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) but less than One Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,700,000.00) ("Level 1 TOT Goal") for two consecutive Operative Years during the Term of this Agreement, the Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee for the next Operative Year (and each Operative Year thereafter) shall be reduced from One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per residential in the Project to Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) per residential unit in the Project. Furthermore, and notwithstanding the three paragraphs above, if the City has received TOT for rentals from the Project (which ... includes TOT from both hotel rooms from the boutique resort hotel in Planning Area III and any and all residential units) in excess of One Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,700,000.00) ("Level 2 TOT Goal") for two consecutive Operative Years during the Term of this Agreement, then the Developer's (or the Developer's successor's) obligation to pay the Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee for any Operative Years thereafter shall terminate and shall no longer be of any further force and effect. Notwithstanding the obligation (or termination of the obligation) by Developer (or Developer's successors) to pay either the One -Time Mitigation Fee or the Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee, all rentals of residential units and hotel units shall remain subject to the City's TOT requirements. The CC&Rs for the residential units in the Project shall provide for the assessment and collection of the Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee and shall provide for and adequately ensure the collection and payment thereof. As to the collection and payment of the Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee, the CC&Rs shall provide the City with enforcement rights against both the Developer or its successor and the individual homeowners. The City shall be provided with the same rights of collection as to the Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee that the Developer or its successor shall have for the collection of other fees and assessments, but the Developer or its successor shall have the obligation for collection and payment of the Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee. In any action by the City to collect the Coral Mountain Resort Annual Mitigation Fee, the City shall, in addition to the fee, be entitled to collect all of its costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees in enforcing its rights. The CC&Rs shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Section 3.8 of this Agreement. 3.6.3 Annual Rate Adjustment. The Coral Mountain Resort Unit Fee, the Level 1 TOT Goal, and the Level 2 TOT Goal shall be adjusted annually, on each July 1st during the term of this Agreement, commencing on the first Annual Mitigation Payment Date, by an increase of two percent (2%) per year. The CC&Rs as described in the last paragraph of Section 3.6.2 above shall include the annual rate adjustment as provided in this Section 3.6.3 of this Agreement. 3.6.4 Other Fees and Charges. Except as expressly limited in this Agreement, nothing set forth in this Agreement is intended to or shall be construed to limit or restrict the City's authority to impose its existing, or any new or increased, Citywide fees, charges, levies, or assessments for the development of the Site, or to impose or increase, subject to the required procedure, any taxes applicable to the Site including but not limited to transient occupancy taxes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Developer reserves the right to challenge the application of any fee, charge, levy, assessment, or tax imposed on the Project or Site by the City if Developer contends it violates the terms of this Agreement or the other Project Approvals. Developer shall timely pay all applicable fees, charges, levies, assessments, and special and general taxes validly imposed in accordance with the Constitution -19- 950 and laws of the State of California, including without limitation school impact fees in accordance with Government Code § § 65995, et seq. 3.7 Dedications and Improvements; Improvement Security. Developer shall complete and offer dedications to the City or other applicable public agency of those public improvements required in connection with the Project, as specified in the Conditions of Approval. In connection with the recordation of any final subdivision map for the Project, Developer shall, through the execution of a subdivision improvement agreement with the City, provide to the City, in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney, improvement security as provided in the City Code to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obligations under this Agreement to construct the on -site and off -site improvements identified on that map. The terms, amounts and provisions for release of the improvement security shall be as set forth in the City Code. 3.8 Declaration(s) of Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions. Developer shall prepare, draft (in a form to be approved by the City Manager and City Attorney), execute, and cause to be recorded in the official records of Riverside County one or more Declaration(s) of Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions ("CC&Rs") to govern the authorized and required land uses and operations at the Site, and the general maintenance, repair, landscaping, public and private utility usage and ownership (including streets, alleys, sidewalks, water, sewer, gas, electricity, telecommunications, and related infrastructure), and any other terms and conditions as may be necessary or appropriate to maintain the use and operation of the Site, and all common areas, consistent with the terms and conditions of the Project. Developer may have CC&Rs prepared, drafted, executed, and recorded for each of the separate phases (Planning Area I, Planning Area II, Planning Area III, and Planning Area IV) of the Project, but the CC&Rs shall include at a minimum the terms and conditions governing the payment of fees as required in Section 6.3 of this Agreement, the terms and conditions allowing for the use of short-term vacation rentals as provided in Article 5 of this Agreement for the applicable Planning Areas of the Project, and general maintenance, repair, landscaping, public and private utility usage and ownership (including streets, alleys, sidewalks, water, sewer, gas, electricity, telecommunications, and related infrastructure. The CC&Rs shall be implemented and enforced by a duly established homeowners association ("HOA") pursuant to state law for a common interest development. The City shall be deemed a third party beneficiary to the CC&Rs with the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any terms and conditions included for the benefit of the City as provided for in this Agreement or the CC&Rs ("City Required Provisions"). The City Required Provisions, once approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, may not be substantively amended or modified without the prior written consent of the City Manager and City Attorney, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 3.9 Indemnification. Developer shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and City's officers, officials, members, employees, volunteers, agents, and representatives (any of the foregoing shall be known individually as "Indemnitee" and collectively as "Indemnitees"), and each of them, -20- 951 jointly and severally, against and from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, damages, costs, expenses, losses and liabilities, at law or in equity, of every kind or nature whatsoever, including reasonable attorneys' fees and expert witness fees, arising out of or directly relating to construction and development -related activities on the Site by Developer, but excluding those resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee, but including, without limitation, injury to or death of any person or persons and damage to or destruction of any property, threatened, brought or instituted ("Claims"). In the event of any action, litigation, or other adversarial proceeding in any way involving the Claims specified in this section, City agrees, at no cost to City, to cooperate with Developer. Developer shall have the obligation to provide the defense of City in the action, litigation, or other adversarial proceeding, either by providing for legal counsel or, at City's option, timely paying the legal costs incurred by City in the defense of litigation, even though negligence or gross negligence of Developer or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees or other persons acting on its behalf has not been established at the time that the defense is provided. In addition, Developer shall be obligated to promptly pay any final judgment or portion thereof rendered against the Indemnitee or Indemnitees. In the event of any court action or proceeding challenging the validity of this Agreement or the Project Approvals, Developer shall indemnify, hold harmless, pay all costs and provide defense for City in said action or proceeding with counsel chosen by Developer and reasonably approved by City. City shall, at no cost to City, cooperate with Developer in any such defense as Developer may reasonably request. In the event Developer fails or refuses to provide such defense of any challenge to this Agreement or the Project Approvals, or any component thereof, City shall have the right not to defend such challenge, and to resolve such challenge in any manner it chooses in its sole discretion, including terminating this Agreement. In the event of such termination, Developer, upon written request of City, shall immediately execute a termination document or other document reasonably required by a reputable title company to remove this Agreement as a cloud on title. 3.10 Permanent Closure of Wave Basin. In the event that the Wave Basin is permanently closed during the term of this Development Agreement, Developer shall be required to dismantle and remove the wave making machinery and shall either (1) continue to operate the basin itself as a recreational lake amenity, or (ii) seek City approval for an alternative use, including obtaining a Conditional Use Permit, Site Development Permit, or other applicable entitlement, if required. 4. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS 4.1 Scope of Subsequent Review/Confirmation of Compliance Process. Nothing set forth herein shall impair or interfere with the right of City to require the processing of building permits as required by law pursuant to the applicable provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code and the provisions of City's Fire Codes and ordinances, Health and Safety Codes and ordinances, and Building, Electrical, Mechanical, and similar building codes. Prior to each request for a building permit, Developer shall provide City with a Compliance Certificate ("Certificate"), in substantially the same form as that attached hereto as Exhibit "F" -21- 952 which shall describe how all applicable Conditions of Approval have been fully complied with. The Certificate shall be distributed to the relevant City departments in order to check the representations made by Developer on the Certificate. 4.2 Project Approvals Independent. All approvals required for the Project which may be or have been granted, and all land use entitlements or approvals generally which have been issued or will be issued by City with respect to the Project, constitute independent actions and approvals by City. If any provision of this Agreement or the application of any provision of this Agreement to a particular situation is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, or if this Agreement terminates for any reason, then such invalidity, unenforceability or termination of this Agreement or any part hereof shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of any such Project approvals or other land use approvals and entitlements. In such cases, such approvals and entitlements will remain in effect pursuant to their own terms, provisions, and the Conditions of Approval. It is understood by the Parties that pursuant to existing law, if this Agreement terminates or is held invalid or unenforceable as described above, such approvals and entitlements shall not remain valid for the term of this Agreement, but shall remain valid for the term of such approvals and entitlements. 4.3 City Cooperation. The parties agree that Developer must be able to proceed rapidly with the development of the Property and, accordingly, that expedited City review of tentative maps, final leaps, modifications to Project Approvals, building permits and construction inspections, is essential to the successful completion of the Project. Accordingly, to the extent that the applications and submittals are in conformity with the Project Approvals, Applicable Rules, and this Agreement, and adequate funding exists therefor, City agrees to provide adequate City resources to diligently accept, review, and take action on all subsequent applications and submittals made to City by Developer in furtherance of the Project. Similarly, to the extent that adequate funding exists therefor, City shall provide adequate City resources to promptly review and approve improvement plans, conduct construction inspections, and accept completed public facilities. Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs associated with providing expedited services, above and beyond those costs covered by the City's Processing Fees. In the event City does not have adequate resources, City shall authorize the use of "contract labor" for inspection and plan review purposes, which shall be reimbursed by Developer, pursuant to a mutually agreeable reimbursement agreement that also specifies any fee credit to Developer to avoid Developer paying more than once for the same plan check, inspection, or other City service. City shall consult with Developer concerning the selection of the most knowledgeable, efficient and available "contract labor" for purposes of providing inspection and plan review duties for the City and the Project; provided, however, that City shall retain the right to select any "contract labor" it reasonably chooses. 4.4 Final Map and Improvement Plan Procedures. The City shall complete improvement plan and final map review in accordance with Applicable Rules, in good faith, and in an expeditious manner. If reasonably necessary, City shall have the right to hire outside inspectors and/or consultants, the cost of which shall be reimbursed -22- 953 by Developer. For those improvement plans or other implementing approvals under the jurisdiction of another agency, if any, the City agrees to reasonably cooperate in providing any necessary information or approval in a timely manner, so long as the plans do not substantially conflict with the Project Approvals. 4.5 Building Permits. City shall complete its review of house plans and issue building permits in a good faith and expeditious manner. Recordation of a final map shall not be required prior to the issuance of building permits for model homes. 4.6 Environmental Review and Mitigation. The Parties understand and agree that the EIR for the Project considers the whole of the Project, including each of the Project Approvals and all Discretionary Actions and Ministerial Permits and Project Approvals necessary for development of the Project. Accordingly, the City agrees to use the certified EIR for this Project as a program and project EIR to comply with CEQA's environmental review requirements for all future Discretionary Actions to the maximum extent allowed by law, including applying the CEQA exemptions specified in Government Code § 65457 and CEQA Guidelines 15182 and 15183, which establish an exemption from further environmental review for the processing of tentative tract maps after certification of a Specific Plan EIR for residential development, if the proposed tentative tract maps are consistent with the Specific Plan and meet other applicable requirements. If an exemption or reliance on the EIR as a program and project EIR is not legally permissible, in the City's sole judgment, then City and Developer agree to meet and confer as to the most appropriate form of environmental review of such approval, provided, however, that City shall retain the authority to determine the most appropriate form of such environmental review. 4.7 Inspections. Any building or fire inspection request received by City from Developer will be processed as expeditiously as possible, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and (as applicable) provisions in the La Quinta Municipal Code and City's standard inspection procedures. 4.8 Review for Compliance. City shall review Developer's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement at least once during every twelve (12) month period following the Effective Date. In accordance with the City's procedures and standards for such review. During such period review by the City, Developer, upon written request from the City, shall be required to demonstrate, and hereby agrees to furnish, evidence of good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The failure of the City to conduct or complete the annual review as provided herein shall not impact the validity of this Agreement or the obligations of the Parties to perform pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If, at the conclusion of the annual review provided for herein, Developer has been found in compliance with this Agreement, City shall, at Developer's request, issue a certificate of compliance to Developer stating that (i) This Agreement remains in full force -23- 954 and effect, and (ii) Developer is in compliance with this Agreement. The certificate of compliance shall be in a form approved by the Parties and, for the City, the City Manager and the City Attorney, and may be in recordable form. Developer may, at its sole cost and expense, record any such certificate of compliance if obtained. If, at the conclusion of the annual review provided for herein, Developer has been found not to be in compliance with this Agreement, City shall, at is sole and absolute discretion, exercise any and all rights available under this Agreement and otherwise available at law or in equity. 5. SHORT TERM VACATION RENTALS/TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES. 5.1 Short Term Vacation Rentals as a Permitted Use. This Agreement and the Specific Plan for the Project provide that short-term vacation rentals are a permitted use in all Planning Areas within the Project and on the Site that allow residential uses, and the rights to such permitted use are hereby vested pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Except to the extent expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement, the City shall not impose on or apply to the Project (whether by action of the Council, or other legislative body, or by initiative, referendum, or other measure) any ordinance, resolution, standard, directive, condition, or other measure that is in conflict with this provision or that would materially interfere with right to apply for and, with City staff approval, operate short-term vacation rentals in all residential units within the Project. Such short-term vacation rentals shall be subject to the terms of the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations set forth in Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (or successor provisions) of the La Quinta Municipal Code, including but not limited to violations and penalties for such violations for failing to comply with the City's Short - Term Vacation Rental Regulations, as long as Developer has the ability to apply for and obtain a permit and subsequently use and operate short-term vacation rentals in all residential units within the Project that are not otherwise subject to a violation or penalty preventing issuance of such permit and allowing such use for failing to comply with the City's Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations.. (For reference only, a copy of Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code in effect as of the Effective Date is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit "G". In the event Chapter 3.25 is repealed in its entirely, the provisions of Chapter 3.25 as attached to this Agreement shall govern the permitting, operation, and renewal of short-term vacation rental permits in the Project and on the Site.) In order to ensure the timely collection and reporting of the applicable transient occupancy taxes, and compliance with the applicable operational requirements and conditions set forth in Chapter 3.25, the Developer or its successor or assignee shall be the "authorized agent or representative" (as that term is defined in Chapter 3.25 or, if the definition is removed during the Term of this Agreement, as defined as of the Effective Date of this Agreement) for all short-term vacation rentals and short-term vacation rental permits within the Project, including but not limited to applying for and managing all short-term vacation rental permits, making all reservations and payments, and ensuring compliance with all other requirements of Chapter 3.25, and shall do so exclusively through a central rental operator pursuant to Section 5.3.1 of this Agreement, which shall be confirmed at the issuance and renewal of each short-term vacation rental permit; provided, however, that the "owner" (as that term is defined in Chapter 3.25 or, if the definition is removed during the Term of this Agreement, as defined as of the Effective Date of this Agreement) shall remain ultimately obligated as the holder of the short-term vacation rental permit for any and all remedial actions necessary for compliance with Chapter 3.25 and this Agreement, including but not limited to the payment of any fines or recorded liens or any other violations for non- -24- 955 compliance; and, provided further, that the "owner" shall have a process available, through an independent arbitrator or neutral decision -maker designated by the homeowner's association ("HOA") of which the short-term vacation rental unit owner is a member, to petition for a change of that owner's "authorized agent or representative" because the owner demonstrates, with a preponderance of evidence, that the "authorized agent or representative," designated by the Developer or its successor or assignee, has failed to perform its duty to ensure compliance with all other requirements of Chapter 3.25 for that owner's short-term vacation rental unit. The CC&Rs as described in Section 3.8 of this Agreement shall include the terms and conditions, and detailed specifics for process and decision, whenever an owner may petition the HOA for a change in that owner's "authorized agent or representative" as required by this Section 5.1; the City Manager and City Attorney shall review and approve, in their reasonable discretion and not to be unreasonably delayed or denied, said terms and conditions in the CC&Rs that would apply if an owner were to petition the HOA for a change in that owner's "authorized agent or representative" as required by this Section 5. L Pursuant to the expressed exceptions referenced in the preceding paragraph, the following provisions shall apply to the use and operation of the Property (and each One of the Properties) within the Project: (A) The operational requirements and restrictions in Section 3.25.070 (or successor section) of the La Quinta Municipal Code shall apply to all short-term vacation rental units, including the limits on the number of daytime and overnight guests in each unit to ensure that occupancy levels are appropriate for the number of bedrooms and compatible with single- family residential communities; (B) All short-term vacation rental units in the Project shall be subject to, at a minimum, the noise restrictions in Sections 9.100.210 and 11.08.040 (or successor sections) of the La Quinta Municipal Code, in addition to any noise compliance requirements set forth in Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 5.2 Transient Occupancy Tax. All short-term vacation rentals in the Project shall be subject to, and comply with, the City's Transient Occupancy Ordinance as set forth in Chapter 3.24 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. To the extent the City revises its Transient Occupancy Ordinance after the Effective Date of this Agreement, all short-term vacation rentals in the Project will be subject to those revised or amended provisions unless doing so would violate the vested rights set forth in Section 5.1 of this Agreement. It is the intent of this provision to require, at all times, that all short-term vacation rentals in the Project comply with the City's requirements and procedures for collecting, reporting and paying the applicable transient occupancy tax, including as those requirements and procedures may be modified during the term of this Agreement. 5.3 Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. All CC&Rs recorded pursuant to Section 3.8 of this Agreement on any property within the Project where residential uses are allowed shall expressly authorize short-term vacation rentals for -25- 956 all residential units. All such CC&Rs shall state the operational requirements and standard conditions applicable to short-term rentals in that tract or planning area of the Project. 5.3.1 Rental Management Pro _gram. Developer shall be responsible for ensuring that for the Term of this Agreement, one or more contract(s) shall be in effect at all times which provide opportunities to the owners of the resort residential units to have the ability to make their units available for short-tenn rentals permitted by this Agreement and the CC&Rs. The contract or contracts may, but are not required to be, with an on -site rental management agent. Developer may assign this obligation to its successors in accordance with this Agreement. 6. DEFAULT: REMEDIES: DISPUTE RESOLUTION. 6.1 Notice of Default. In the event of failure by either Party substantially to perform any material term or provision of this Agreement, the non -defaulting Party shall have those rights and remedies provided herein, provided that such non -defaulting Party has first provided to the defaulting Party a written notice of default in the manner required by Section 8.1 hereof identifying with specificity the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which said default may satisfactorily be cured. 6.2 Cure of Default. Upon the receipt of the notice of default, the alleged defaulting Party shall promptly commence to cure, correct, or remedy the identified default at the earliest reasonable time after receipt of the notice of default and shall complete the cure, correction or remedy of such default not later than thirty (30) days after receipt of the notice of default, or, for such defaults that cannot reasonably be cured, corrected or remedied within thirty (30) days, such Party shall commence to cure, correct, or remedy such default within such thirty (30) day period, shall and continuously and diligently prosecute such cure, correction or remedy to completion. 6.3 City Remedies. In the event of an uncured default by Developer of the terms of this Agreement, City, at its option, may institute legal action in law or in equity to cure, correct, or remedy such default, enjoin any threatened or attempted violation, or enforce the terms of this Agreement; provided, however, that in no event shall City be entitled to consequential damages for any Developer default. For purposes of this Agreement the term "consequential damages" shall include, but not be limited to, potential loss of anticipated tax revenues from the Project or any portion thereof. Furthermore, City, in addition to or as an alternative to exercising the remedies set forth in this Section 6.3, in the event of a material uncured default by Developer, may give notice of its intent to terminate or modify this Agreement pursuant to City's Development Agreement Ordinance and/or the Development Agreement Act, in which event the matter shall be scheduled for consideration and review by the City Council in the manner set forth in the City's Development Agreement Ordinance or the Development Agreement Act. -26- 957 6.4 Developer's Exclusive Remedies. The parties acknowledge that the City would not have entered into this Agreement if it were to be liable in damages under, or with respect to, this Agreement or any of the matters referred to herein including, but not limited to, the Project Approvals, the Applicable Rules or any future amendments or enactments thereto, or the Project, except as provided in this Section. Accordingly, Developer covenants on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, not to sue the City for damages or monetary relief (except for attorneys' fees as provided for by Section 8.22) for any breach of this Agreement by City or arising out of or connected with any dispute, controversy, or issue between Developer and City regarding this Agreement or any of the matters referred to herein including but not limited to the application, interpretation, or effect of this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Applicable Rules or any future amendments or enactments thereto, or the Project, or any land use permits or approvals sought in connection with the development of the Project or any component thereof, or use of a parcel or any portion thereof, the parties agreeing that declaratory and injunctive relief, mandate, and specific performance shall be Developer's sole and exclusive judicial remedies. 7. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION; CERTAIN RIGHTS OF CURE 7.1 Encumbrances on the Project Site. This Agreement shall not prevent or limit Developer from encumbering the Site or any portion thereof or any improvements thereon with any mortgage, deed of trust, sale and leaseback arrangement, or any other form of conveyance in which the Site, or a portion thereof or interest therein, is pledged as security, and contracted for in good faith and fair value (a "Mortgage") securing financing with respect to the construction, development, use or operation of the Project. 7.2 Mortgage Protection. This Agreement shall be superior and senior to the lien of any Mortgage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith and for value, and any acquisition or acceptance of title or any right or interest in or with respect to the Site or any portion thereof by a holder of a beneficial interest under a Mortgage, or any successor or assignee to said holder (a "Mortgagee") [whether pursuant to foreclosure, trustee's sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, lease termination or otherwise] shall be subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 7.3 Mortgagee Not Obli ag ted. No Mortgagee will have any obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform the obligations of the Developer or other affirmative covenants of Developer hereunder, or to guarantee such performance, except that (i) the Mortgagee shall have no right to develop or operate the Site, and (ii) to the extent that any covenant to be performed by the Developer is a condition to the performance of a covenant by the City, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to the City's performance hereunder. -27- 7.4 Notice of Default to Mortgazee, Right of Mortgat4 ee to Cure. With respect to any mortgage or deed of trust granted by Developer, whenever City may deliver any notice or demand to Developer with respect to any breach or default by Developer in completion of construction of the Project or any component of the Project, City shall at the same time deliver a copy of such notice or demand to each holder of record of any mortgage or deed of trust which has previously requested such notice in writing. Each such holder shall (insofar as the rights granted by City are concerned) have the right, at its option, within sixty (60) days after the receipt of the notice, to cure or remedy or commence to cure or remedy and thereafter to pursue with due diligence the cure or remedy of any such default and to add the cost thereof to the mortgage debt and the lien of its mortgage. It is understood that a holder shall be deemed to have satisfied the sixty (60) day time limit set forth above for commencing to cure or remedy a Developer default which requires title and/or possession of the Site (or portion thereof) if and to the extent any such holder has within such sixty (60) day period commenced proceedings to obtain title and/or possession and thereafter the holder diligently pursues such proceedings to completion and cures or remedies the default. 8. MISCELLANEOUS 8.1 Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties. Any approval, disapproval, demand, document or other notice ("Notice") which either Party may desire to give to the other Party under this Agreement must be in writing and shall be sufficiently given if (i) delivered by hand, (ii) delivered by reputable same -day or overnight messenger service that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of City and Developer at the addresses specified below, or at any other address as that Party may later designate by Notice. To City: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attn: Community Development Director With a copy to: Rutan & Tucker, LLP 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Attn: William H. Ihrke To Developer: CM Wave Development LLC Attn: Stowell, Zeilenga, Ruth, Vaughn & Treiger, LLP 959 With copies to: 4590 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Suite 100 Westlake Village, CA 91362 Attn: James D. Vaughn, Esq Any written notice, demand or communication shall be deemed received immediately if personally delivered or delivered by delivery service, and shall be deemed received on the third day from the date it is postmarked if delivered by registered or certified mail. 8.2 Force Majeure. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by either Party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where delays or Defaults are due to causes beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time to perform, which may include the following (each, a "Force Majeure"): war; insurrection; acts of terrorism; strikes; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; lack of transportation; governmental restrictions or priority imposed or mandated by other governmental entities; unusually severe weather; inability to secure necessary labor, materials or tools; delays of any contractor, subcontractor or supplier; acts or omissions of the other Party; or acts or failures to act of any public or governmental agency or entity (other than the acts or failures to act of City which shall not excuse performance by City), or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, an extension of time for any such cause shall only be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other Party within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the cause, or shall commence to run from the date such notice is subsequently given. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of City and Developer. Notwithstanding the paragraph above, Developer is not entitled pursuant to this Section 8.2 to an extension of time to perform because of past, present, or future difficulty in obtaining suitable construction or permanent financing for the development of the Site, or because of economic or market conditions. 8.3 BindingEffect. ffect. This Agreement, and all of the terms and conditions hereof, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties, any subsequent owner of all or any portion of the Project or the Site, and their respective assigns, heirs or successors in interest, whether or not any reference to this Agreement is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Project or the Site. -29- M 8.4 Independent Entity. The Parties acknowledge that, in entering into and performing this Agreement, each of Developer and City is acting as an independent entity and not as an agent of the other in any respect. 8.5 Agreement Not to Benefit Third Parties. This Agreement is made for the sole benefit of the Parties, and no other person shall be deemed to have any privity of contract under this Agreement nor any right to rely on this Agreement to any extent for any purpose whatsoever, nor have any right of action of any kind on this Agreement nor be deemed to be a third party beneficiary under this Agreement. 8.6 Covenants. The provisions of this Agreement shall constitute mutual covenants which shall run with the land comprising the Site for the benefit thereof, and for the benefit of City, and the burdens and benefits hereof shall bind and inure to the benefit of each of the Parties hereto and all successors in interest to the Parties hereto for the term of this Agreement. 8.7 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No official, officer, employee, agent or representative of City, acting in his/her official capacity, shall be personally liable to Developer, or any successor or assign, for any loss, costs, damage, claim, liability, or judgment, arising out of or connection to this Agreement, or for any act or omission on the part of City. 8.8 Covenant Against Discrimination. Developer and City covenant and agree, for themselves and their respective successors and assigns, that there shall be no discrimination against, or segregation of, any person or group or persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry, or any other impermissible classification, in the performance of this Agreement. Developer shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq.). 8.9 No Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought and referring expressly to this Section. No delay or omission by either Party in exercising any right or power accruing upon non-compliance or failure to perform by the other Party under any of the provisions of this Agreement shall impair any such right or power or be construed to be a waiver thereof, except as expressly provided herein. No waiver by either Party of any of the covenants or conditions to be performed by the other Party shall be construed or deemed a waiver of any succeeding breach or nonperformance of the same or other covenants and conditions hereof. -30- 961 8.10 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, to the extent that the invalidity or unenforceability does not impair the application of this Agreement as intended by the Parties. 8.11 Cooperation in Carrying Out Agreement. Each Party shall take such actions and execute and deliver to the other all such further instruments and documents as may be reasonably necessary to carry out this Agreement in order to provide and secure to the other Party the full and complete enjoyment of its rights and privileges hereunder. 8.12 Estoppel Certificate. Either Party may, at any time, deliver written notice to any other Party requesting such Party to certify in writing that, to the best knowledge of the certifying Party, (i) this Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the Parties, (ii) this Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing, or if so amended, identifying the amendments, (iii) the requesting Party is not in default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or if in default, describing the nature and amount of any such defaults, and (iv) any other reasonable information requested. A Party receiving a request hereunder shall execute and return such certificate within ten (10) days following approval of the proposed estoppel certificate by the City Attorney, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and Development Director are each authorized to sign and deliver an estoppel certificate on behalf of City. City acknowledges that a certificate hereunder may be relied upon by transferees and Mortgagees. 8.13 Construction. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction that might otherwise apply. As used in this Agreement, and as the context may require, the singular includes the plural and vice versa, and the masculine gender includes the feminine and vice versa. 8.14 Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded with the County Recorder of Riverside County at Developer's cost, if any, within the period required by Government Code Section 65868.5. Amendments approved by the Parties, and any cancellation or termination of this Agreement, shall be similarly recorded. 8.15 Captions and References. The captions of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Agreement are solely for convenience of reference, and shall be disregarded in the construction and interpretation of this -31- 962 Agreement. Reference herein to a paragraph or exhibit are the paragraphs, subparagraphs and exhibits of this Agreement. 8.16 Time. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement and of each and every term and condition hereof as to which time is an element. 8.17 Recitals & Exhibits Incorporated; Entire Agreement. The Recitals to this Agreement and all of the exhibits and attachments to this Agreement are, by this reference, incorporated into this Agreement and made a part hereof. This Agreement, including all Exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and this Agreement supersedes all previous negotiations, discussions and agreements between the Parties, and no parole evidence of any prior or other agreement shall be permitted to contradict or vary the terms hereof. 8.18 Exhibits. Exhibits "A"-"H" to which reference is made in this Agreement are deemed incorporated herein in their entirety, whether or not such exhibits are attached hereto in full. Said exhibits are identified as follows: A Legal Description of Site B Site Map C Project Design Features D. Mitigation Monitoring Program E. Conditions of Approval F. Compliance Certificate G. Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (as of Effective Date) H. Schedule of Performance 8.19 Counterpart Signature Pages. For convenience the Parties may execute and acknowledge this agreement in counterparts and when the separate signature pages are attached hereto, shall constitute one and the same complete Agreement. 8.20 Authority to Execute; Representations and Warranties. Developer warrants and represents that (i) it is duly organized and existing, (ii) it is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, Developer -32- 963 is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) Developer's entering into and performance of its obligations set forth in this Agreement do not violate any provision of any other agreement to which Developer is bound, and (v) except for the threat of litigation from individuals and organizations who made comments on the EIR or otherwise exhausted their administrative remedies prior to the close of the public hearings on the Project Approvals, there is no existing or threatened litigation or legal proceeding of which Developer is aware which could prevent Developer from entering into or performing its covenants and obligations set forth in this Agreement. City warrants and represents that the person or persons executing this Agreement on its behalf have been duly authorized to execute this Agreement and bind the City to all covenants and obligations set forth in this Agreement. 8.21 City Approvals and Actions. Whenever a reference is made in this Agreement to an action or approval to be undertaken by the City Manager, his or her authorized designee is authorized to act on behalf of the City unless specifically provided otherwise or the law otherwise requires. 8.22 Governing Law; Litigation Matters. The internal laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement without regard to conflicts of law principles. Any action at law or in equity brought by either Party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing, or interpreting the validity of this Agreement or any provision hereof shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Riverside, or such other appropriate court in said county, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal, or change of venue to any other court. Service of process on City shall be made in accordance with California law. Service of process on Developer shall be made in any manner permitted by California law and shall be effective whether served inside or outside of California. In the event of any action between the Parties hereto seeking enforcement of any of the terms of this Agreement or otherwise arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation shall be awarded, in addition to such relief to which such Party is entitled, its reasonable attorney's fees, expert witness fees, and litigation costs and expenses. 8.23 No Brokers. Each of the City and the Developer represents to the other party that it has not engaged the services of any finder or broker and that it is not liable for any real estate commissions, broker's fees, or finder's fees which may accrue by means of this Agreement, and agrees to hold harmless the other party from such commissions or fees as are alleged to be due from the party making such representations. (signatures on next page) -33- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and City have executed this Agreement as of the Reference Date. ATTEST: Monika Radeva City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP William H. Ihrke City Attorney "DEVELOPER" CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company in Its: "CITY" CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation By: Name Title: Jon McMillen City Manager -34- M EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE (Attached) [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT `B" SITE MAP (Attached) [to be inserted] EXHIBIT `B" 967 EXHIBIT "C" PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES (Attached) EXHIBIT "C" DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES Coral Mountain Resort, La Quinta CA Exhibit C DRAFT Project Design Features Air Quality The project incorporates the following design features and attributes for promoting energy efficiency and sustainability, which shall be enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement. The following PDFs were accounted for in CalEEMod to reduce emissions associated with each applicable subcategory: • Pedestrian connections shall be provided to surrounding areas consistent with the City's General Plan. Providing a pedestrian access network to link areas of the project site encourages people to walk instead of drive. The project would provide a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site. The project would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. • Having different types of land uses near one another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non -auto modes of transport. For example, when residential areas are in the same neighborhood as retail and office buildings, a resident does not need to travel outside of the neighborhood to meet his/her trip needs. A description of diverse uses for urban and suburban areas is provided below • The project will include improved design elements to enhance walkability and connectivity. Improved street network characteristics within a neighborhood include street accessibility, usually measured in terms of average block size, proportion of four- way intersections, or number of intersections per square mile. Design is also measured in terms of sidewalk coverage, building setbacks, street widths, pedestrian crossings, presence of street trees, and a host of other physical variables that differentiate pedestrian -oriented environments from auto -oriented environments. • Commute Trip Reduction Program is a multi -strategy program that encompasses a combination of individual measures. It is presented as a means of preventing double - counting of reductions for individual measures that are included in this strategy. It does so by setting a maximum level of reductions that should be permitted for a combined set of strategies within a voluntary program. • Encouraging telecommuting and alternative work schedules reduces the number of commute trips and therefore VMT traveled by employees. Alternative work schedules could take the form of staggered starting times, flexible schedules, or compressed work weeks. Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 1 March 2022 969 EXHIBIT C — DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES • This project will implement an employer -sponsored vanpool or shuttle. A vanpool will usually service employees' commute to work while a shuttle will service nearby transit stations and surrounding commercial centers. Employer -sponsored vanpool programs entail an employer purchasing or leasing vans for employee use, and often subsidizing the cost of at least program administration, if not more. The driver usually receives personal use of the van, often for a mileage fee. Scheduling is within the employer's purview, and rider charges are normally set on the basis of vehicle and operating cost. • The project will design building shells and building components, such as windows; roof systems: • electrical and lighting systems: and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems to meet 2019 Title 24 Standards which results in 30% less energy for non-residential buildings and 53% less energy for residential use due to lighting upgrades. • The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. • Using electricity generated from photovoltaic (PV) systems displaces electricity demand which would ordinarily be supplied by the local utility. Since zero GHG emissions are associated with electricity generation from PV systems, the GHG emissions reductions from this PDF are equivalent to the emissions that would have been produced had electricity been supplied by the local utility. A minimum of 15% of the project's electricity demand will be generated on -site. • In order to reduce the amount of waste disposed at landfills, the project would be required to implement a 65% waste diversion as required by AB 939. The following PDFs are part of the project, but no numeric credit has been taken for their implementation to assure a conservative analysis: • Increasing the vehicle occupancy by ride sharing will result in fewer cars driving the same trip, and thus a decrease in VMT. The project will include a ride -sharing program as well as a permanent transportation management association membership and funding requirement. The project will promote ride -sharing programs through a multi -faceted approach such as: • Designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles • Designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride -sharing vehicles • Providing a web site or message board for coordinating rides • The project will implement marketing strategies to reduce commute trips. Information • sharing and marketing are important components to successful commute trip reduction strategies. Implementing commute trip reduction strategies without a complementary marketing strategy will result in lower VMT reductions. Marketing strategies may include: Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 2 March 2022 970 EXHIBIT C — DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES • New employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode options • Event promotions • Publications • Specified use of Energy Star appliances. • Installation of water -efficient plumbing fixtures. • Installation of tankless water heater systems. • Installation of light -emitting diode (LED) technology within homes. • Use of recycled water for common area landscape irrigation. • Use of drought -tolerant plants in landscape design. • Installation of water -efficient irrigation systems with smart sensor controls. • Lighting sources contribute to GHG emissions indirectly, via the production of the electricity that powers these lights. Public street and area lighting include: streetlights, pedestrian pathway lights, area lighting for parks and parking lots, and outdoor lighting around public buildings. Lighting design should consider the amount of light required for the area intended to be lit. Lumens are the measure of the amount of light perceived by the human eye. Different light fixtures have different efficacies or the amount of lumens produced per watt of power supplied. This is different than efficiency, and it is important that lighting improvements are based on maintaining the appropriate lumens per area when applying this measure. Installing more efficacious lamps will use less electricity while producing the same amount of light, and therefore reduces the associated indirect GHG emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The project incorporates the following design features and attributes for promoting energy efficiency and sustainability, which shall be enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement. The following PDFs were accounted for in CalEEMod to reduce emissions associated with each applicable subcategory: • Pedestrian connections shall be provided to surrounding areas consistent with the City's General Plan. Providing a pedestrian access network to link areas of the project site encourages people to walk instead of drive. The project would provide a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site. The project would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. • Having different types of land uses near one another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non -auto modes of transport. For example, when residential areas are in the same neighborhood as retail Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 3 March 2022 971 EXHIBIT C — DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES and office buildings, a resident does not need to travel outside of the neighborhood to meet his/her trip needs. A description of diverse uses for urban and suburban areas is provided below • The project will include improved design elements to enhance walkability and connectivity. Improved street network characteristics within a neighborhood include street accessibility, usually measured in terms of average block size, proportion of four- way intersections, or number of intersections per square mile. Design is also measured in terms of sidewalk coverage, building setbacks, street widths, pedestrian crossings, presence of street trees, and a host of other physical variables that differentiate pedestrian -oriented environments from auto -oriented environments. • Voluntary Commute Trip Reduction Program — A multi -strategy program that encompasses a combination of individual measures. It is presented as a means of preventing double -counting of reductions for individual measures that are included in this strategy. It does so by setting a maximum level of reductions that should be permitted for a combined set of strategies within a voluntary program. • Encouraging telecommuting and alternative work schedules reduces the number of commute trips and therefore VMT traveled by employees. Alternative work schedules could take the form of staggered starting times, flexible schedules, or compressed work weeks. • This project will implement an employer -sponsored vanpool or shuttle. A vanpool will usually service employees' commute to work while a shuttle will service nearby transit stations and surrounding commercial centers. Employer -sponsored vanpool programs entail an employer purchasing or leasing vans for employee use, and often subsidizing the cost of at least program administration, if not more. The driver usually receives personal use of the van, often for a mileage fee. Scheduling is within the employer's purview, and rider charges are normally set on the basis of vehicle and operating cost. • The project will design building shells and building components, such as windows; roof systems: electrical and lighting systems: and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems to meet 2019 Title 24 Standards which are expected to result in 30% less energy use for non- residential buildings and 53% less energy use for residential use due to lighting upgrades. • The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. • Using electricity generated from photovoltaic (PV) systems displaces electricity demand which would ordinarily be supplied by the local utility. Since zero GHG emissions are associated with electricity generation from PV systems, the GHG emissions reductions from this PDF are equivalent to the emissions that would have been produced had Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 4 March 2022 972 EXHIBIT C — DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES electricity been supplied by the local utility. A minimum of 15% of the project's electricity demand will be generated on -site. • In order to reduce the amount of waste disposed at landfills, the project would be required to implement a 65% waste diversion as required by AB 939. The following PDFs are part of the project, but no numeric credit has been taken for their implementation to provide a conservative analysis: • Increasing the vehicle occupancy by ride sharing will result in fewer cars driving the same trip, and thus a decrease in VMT. The project will include a ride -sharing program as well as a permanent transportation management association membership and funding requirement. The project will promote ride -sharing programs through a multi -faceted approach such as: • Designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles • Designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride -sharing vehicles • Providing a web site or message board for coordinating rides • The project will implement marketing strategies to reduce commute trips. Information sharing and marketing are important components to successful commute trip reduction strategies. Implementing commute trip reduction strategies without a complementary marketing strategy will result in lower VMT reductions. Marketing strategies may include: • New employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode options • Event promotions • Publications • Specified use of Energy Star appliances. • Installation of water -efficient plumbing fixtures. • Installation of tankless water heater systems. • Installation of light -emitting diode (LED) technology within homes. • Use of recycled water for common area landscape irrigation. • Use of drought -tolerant plants in landscape design. • Installation of water -efficient irrigation systems with smart sensor controls. • Lighting sources contribute to GHG emissions indirectly, via the production of the electricity that powers these lights. Public street and area lighting includes: streetlights, pedestrian pathway lights, area lighting for parks and parking lots, and outdoor lighting around public buildings. Lighting design should consider the amount of light required for the area intended to be lit. Lumens are the measure of the amount of light perceived by the human eye. Different light fixtures have different efficacies or the amount of lumens produced per watt of power supplied. This is different than efficiency, and it is important Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 5 March 2022 973 EXHIBIT C — DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES that lighting improvements are based on maintaining the appropriate lumens per area when applying this measure. Installing more efficacious lamps will use less electricity while producing the same amount of light, and therefore reduces the associated indirect GHG emissions. Energy Resources See PDFs listed under Greenhouse Gas Emissions, above, as they are applicable to energy consumption. Energy -saving and sustainable design features, as well as operational programs would be incorporated. Because these features/attributes are integral to the project, and/or are regulatory requirements, they are not considered to be mitigation measures. The project will require submittal to the appropriate agencies discussed in this section for review and approval of on -site design for circulation, building standards and utility installation. The following PDFs are part of the project; however, per the GHG Report, no numeric credit has been taken for their implementation in order to produce a conservative analysis: • Specified use of Energy Star appliances • Installation of water -efficient plumbing fixtures • Installation of tankless water heaters • Installation of light -emitting diode (LED) technology within homes • Use of recycled water (non -potable) for common area landscape irrigation • Use of drought -tolerant plants in landscape design • Installation of water -efficient irrigation systems with smart sensor controls • Installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems Noise Six -Foot Perimeter Wall to Reduce Arterial Roadway Noise A six-foot perimeter wall will be developed along the northern and eastern property boundaries, adjacent to the proposed Low Density Residential Planning Area (PA II). The six-foot perimeter walls will be located adjacent to PA II in order to protect the proposed onsite residential uses from off -site traffic noise by implementing improvements that diminish noise levels. Perimeter walls will be developed along the southern and western property boundaries as a design requirement of the City. The Noise Study determined that the barriers shall provide a weight of at least four pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line -of -sight openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 6 March 2022 974 EXHIBIT C — DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. Because this requirement was assumed in the Noise Study analysis, and to assure effective mitigation of noise from the project, Mitigation Measure N0I-5 is provided in Section 4.11, Noise, in the Draft EIR to assure the proper construction of perimeter walls. This project Development Agreement will ensure that the project design features and mitigation will be enforceable by the City. Public Services The proposed project will be required to comply with existing regulations and standards (identified in Section 4.12, Public Services, of the Draft EIR) to ensure that the project's potential impacts associated with public facilities and services related to fire and police emergency and non -emergency services, as well as impacts to schools, do not result in significant impacts. Typical for residential communities in the City of La Quinta, the project and residential areas shall be gated, thus increasing community security and minimizing potential crimes, and consistent with standard operations of resort communities, the proposed Hotel and Resort Amenities will incorporate private security services to maximize security of the overall project. Additionally, lighting features throughout the project will enhance security and maximize visibility within the project including streets, intersections, and other crosswalks. Transportation Project Design Features (PDF) are incorporated that encourage the use of alternative transportation measures including pedestrian and bicycle travel. The project will include design elements such as sidewalk coverage, building setbacks, street widths, pedestrian crossings, presence of street trees, and other physical variables that differentiate pedestrian - oriented environments from auto -oriented environments. The project will provide a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site. The project would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. The project includes sidewalk connections, particularly to / from the retail areas interacting with residential and resort uses on -site. Project Design Features for VMT Reduction Transportation demand management (TDM) strategies were evaluated for the purpose of reducing VMT impacts determined to be potentially significant. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, (CAPCOA) 2010 provides guidance for evaluating the potential reduction in VMT expected for individual measures. Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 7 March 2022 975 EXHIBIT C — DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES The project setting best reflects what CAPCOA refers to as a suburban place type because it is characterized by dispersed, low -density, single -use automobile dependent land use patterns. The maximum reduction expected when combining multiple mitigation strategies for the suburban place type is 10 percent and requires a project to contain a diverse land use mix, workforce housing, and project -specific transit, according to CAPCOA. The project incorporates design features and attributes promoting trip reduction. Because these features/attributes are integral to the project, and/or are regulatory requirements, they are not considered to be mitigation measures. These features are considered after the VMT data is extracted from the traffic model. Project VMT is reduced by the following project design features/attributes, which are enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement, and are anticipated to collectively reduce project home -based VMT by approximately 6%. • The placement of different types of land uses near one another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non - auto modes of transport. For example, when residential areas are in the same neighborhood as commercial and resort land uses, a resident does not need to travel outside of the neighborhood to meet his/her recreational and retail needs. The project's mixed -use environment could provide for a potential reduction in project residential VMT of 3% according to CAPCOA guidance. • The project includes improved design elements to enhance walkability and connectivity. Recognized improved street network characteristics within the project include sidewalk coverage, building setbacks, street widths, pedestrian crossings, presence of street trees, and a host of other physical variables that differentiate pedestrian -oriented environments from auto -oriented environments. The project provides a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site. The project minimizes barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. The project includes sidewalk connections, particularly to / from the retail areas resulting in interaction with residential and resort uses on -site. The project's implementation of this measure is anticipated to result in a potential reduction in project residential VMT of 2% according to CAPCOA guidance. • The project will implement marketing strategies to optimize on -site resort and residential uses. Information sharing and marketing are important components to successful trip reduction strategies. Marketing strategies may include: o Resident member benefits that include use of the resort amenities Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 8 March 2022 976 EXHIBIT C — DRAFT PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES o Event promotions o Publications The project's implementation of this measure could provide for a potential reduction in project residential VMT of 1% according to CAPCOA guidance. Travel demand modeling of VMT for the project based upon City of La Quinta guidelines indicates a potential impact for residential uses while also indicating the project's non-residential uses do not exceed VMT thresholds. Project design features considered after the modeling process reduce residential VMT from 11.64 VMT / resident to 10.94 VMT per resident, which is less than the City's VMT residential threshold for a significant impact. The unique mixed -use characteristics of the project, combined with walkability and connectivity design elements, optimize on -site interaction and result in a lower VMT than standalone uses. Implementation of the previously stated project PDFs will reduce potential impacts to below the City's established threshold for a significant VMT impact, and therefore, the residential portion of the project would have a less than significant VMT impact. This project Development Agreement will ensure that the mitigation measures and project design features identified in the Draft EIR are enforceable by the City. Coral Mountain Resort Exhibit C 9 March 2022 977 EXHIBIT "D" MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Attached) [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT " B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Attached) [to be inserted] EXHIBIT ` E" 979 EXHIBIT "F" COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE (CM Wave Development LLC, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT) The undersigned, CM Wave Development LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Developer"), pursuant to that certain Development Agreement dated 12022, (the "Development Agreement"), by and among Developer and the City of La Quinta, a California municipal corporation and charter city (the "City") by its signature below hereby certifies to the City, for the City's reliance that: 1. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Development Agreement; 2. The undersigned is familiar with the certifications and representations set forth in this Compliance Certificate; 3. Developer has performed and complied with its obligations under the Development Agreement to be performed or complied with by it on or prior to the date hereof. 4. [CITY MAY INSERT ANY ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT]. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Compliance Certificate is executed effective the day of I , under penalty of perjury under the laws of California. CM Wave Development LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Its: By: Its: EXHIBIT "F" •:E EXHIBIT "G" CHAPTER 3.25 OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE AS OF EFFECTIVE DATE (for reference only) (Attached) [to be inserted] EXHIBIT "G" EXHIBIT "H" SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE (Attached) EXHIBIT "H" }; c M _0 v c o c _r_ E o a) a) E o v a) v a) v v v Q o C) +, v > (0 f6 (0 (O f6 (0 f6 a) X O O O 0 0> N v i 4� 4� 4� i i 4-1 + U a) ru U O % (% Ln ! N (% U) a+ v a� a) () a) a) a) a) a) \ L + N +° 4-Z v o (6 l0 m f0 C6 [0 (0 L L L L i L C) O In to co L ca m mco ca :+ — a Z a) () () a) a) a) a) U >- >- >- >- >- >� >- a Z, a) CL c E n > ++ O C) O L bn O `~ O C - a) c v a) a c O O O 4� rya — O 4� m C) 0 4L (31 L �_ L~ v> O O bn Q bn +U v L O O Q Q n V a� a) s 0 +, 4- C) up i �ii N C CL � ^ = a O tB U Q) U O > L ++ vi 4� +� v 4, 4- O� � 4- O O L�- p p M Q-o bq C .S 2 C m E dF i i i "IL ra Z •`n a) a' 7 O a) v1 vl fB (0 ra X 7aLn h b0 CO 'C: +� O W � O M O Ln L >.2 L s L C +, a _ cu m m +J > (3) m CL i-- a) > > > CC > U) fl_ a) a) E - U c�a v o O� a) > (3) *' > m a) a) t O O' C) i++ U t o ++ O -0 U O a) n3 a) C2 4�Q p + m L p O a) M U Iblo 4� � 4-a) -0 C) U C O to O c M c a) a) O -0 N O m w ra c0 (3j o_ a) U CL ra N O bA 4- is V) —^ O v v ,} 4— � -O aJ C L L O O N C C O N -2 o O O O 7 Z) C a L U o 3 N O O i v � v O� C a) _ �'n U 00 r-I � C N LO N O u co ON 'C Q \ > c:-0 x x x x x (Uv ca No - E f6 o O O O O O > O- ns L O Q O >i C2 O C a) a) Q +O �_ O O O CL a) O n3 n3 r� tB cB m a) p a) c-I N M N c-I N M �a-I Lr- � In }' N to to to °) a) v *' o L L L >. f0 0 ra (6 m m m m m ti4 n3 U bn c o C U r c a a>i a i E n3 L C f0 C f6 C mU c 3 O v > O � NE REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 30 P10 ftk,24 INTERN IONALAI:�� * AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, May 18, 2022 - 5:30 P.M. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting will be conducted by teleconference and there will be no in -person public access to the meeting location. Submit your public comment to the Airport Commission electronically. Material may be emailed to: Christina.brown(dpalmsprinasca.aov - Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Airport Commission and retained for the official record. To provide public comments at the meeting, please use the following link hUP_5;9 s02w b.zoo .us[jLU 19815290?,pw4-Z„itOZDlyeGZhNUNEgTVkU29nTUdPdzO9 or call (669) 900-6833 and enter Meeting ID: 860 1981 5290 - Passcode: 583916 Pursuant to G. C. Section 54957.5 the designated office for inspection of public records in connection with the public meeting of the Airport Commission is the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, located at 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, California 92262. It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the Department of Aviation will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact (760) 318-3800 forty-eight hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodations to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis. ____ ......... .City of Palm Springs: ........... Riverside Count ". y Vacant -Ci—t "_of Cathedral Cit : y y Jill Philbrook Cit of PaIrn''�� -,___. _____ ' Desert: y Kevin Wiseman ------------ Aftab Dada - Chair David Feltman Kevin J. Corcoran Ken Hedrick City of Indian Wells: City of Coachella: City of Rancho Mirage: Vice Chair ----•�...._-� •�--- ••• -- ---- --- -Paul Budilo Gabriel Martin Thomas Weil Gerald Adams Scott G. Miller Patricia Breslin John Payne City of La Quinta: I Kathleen Hughes City of Desert Hot Springs: Jan Pye City of Indio: Jhan Schmitz Todd Burke M. Guillermo Suero Palm Springs City Staff Justin Clifton Harry Barrett Jr., A.A.E. City Manager Airport Executive Director AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director, City of Palm Springs, California, hereby certify this agenda was posted on May 12, 2022, in accordance with established policies and procedµures...................W..... ...._......�...._. _.. 1. CALL TO ORDER — PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. POSTING OF AGENDA 3. ROLL CALL Airport CommiWon Meebrig Agenda May 18, 2022 — Page 2 MM, 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Limited to three minutn any subject within the purview of the Commission 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Airport, Commission Regular Meeting of April 2.0, 2022 iWGIRT 11;aL �1 11111 1II IT q1111 PA ff1WWTA-WW[i`F`1 1 :1 1111ilri'm I ii T 1 10 1 K mn- 07m 10.A Projects Update and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update 10.8 Financial Summary Update 10.0 Marketing Update 10 D Coon RFP Update 12.A Past City Council Actions 1,2.1 Future City Council Actions, 13. RECEIVE AND FILE: 11A AO'ine Activity Report April 20,22 11B Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison 11C Airlines Schedules June 20,22 13.1) Public Correspondence 14. COMMITTEE& 14-A Future Committee Meetings The Airport Commission will adjourn to a Regular Meeting on gone 5, 2022, at 5:30 P.M. via teleconference. MR Palm Springs Airport Commission Report — May 16, 2022 Meeting City Manager Report —Justin Clifton was not able to attend. Introductions & Presentations: None Discussion and Action Items: • Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee Update - to be incorporated into Executive Director Report Airport Executive Director Report — Harry Barrett Jr. focused on the key concerns of the airport commission: • Noise — 5 complaints during the month of April which is typical for this time of year. Complaints have dropped since airline service has decreased as anticipated. • Parking — The last few months the airport has been at 69% capacity. A facilitator is needed to evaluate parking options so that improvements can be made for the future. The airport also would like to have a discussion once again with Sun Bus to determine if an agreement could be made for passenger drop-off at the front of the airport instead of a block away. One commissioner has a relationship with Sun Bus and offered to approach them and initiate a discussion. • Baggage handling overall — most likely will not be improved until Autumn. This needs creative thinking and working closely with TSA. Security risks must be considered before bags can be checked prior to walking inside the airport whether it be picked -up at one's hotel, curbside check -in or whatever plan could be initiated. It will take 3-4 months to analyze this problem. • Baggage Claim — Airlines are now announcing which carousels the bags will be on prior to unloading the aircraft. Also announcements are being made while passengers are in the baggage claim area as well as a reminder to the passenger. The airlines now realize that they are responsible for providing a better customer service experience. Airport will also hire some new staff starting July to assist in monitoring this situation. • Aerocloud — This new system provides a 360 degree view of the airport and what the airlines are doing on the ramp. Airlines are being made aware of when they need to improve their performance. • Strategy Sessions with City Council and airport commissioners will commence in June and be held at City Hall, the Convention Center or a local hotel. They will be either one or two half day sessions. Marketing Report — Deputy Director of Aviation Marketing and Air Service — Daniel Meier • Aviatrix Communications — their RFP was selected to be the company to develop the airport brand and create new airport website. They are based in San Diego and have worked with PSP last year. They have great experience, worked with 20 other airports including San Diego, San Luis Obispo, New Orleans and Oakland for brand development. The new website will feature multiple languages, interactive route map options, hopefully airfares linked to the route map and social media streaming. The cost is $149,000 annually. • Advertising RVP Update — Will be on the June 15 commission meeting agenda as it was too late and lengthy to be on the May agenda. • Airline Service Update - April 2022 was the 9th record month set by PSP being 17.5% over April 2019. Forward bookings look very strong throughout the summer. However, PSP is being somewhat affected by pilot shortage which are impacting all airports across the country. Southwest (WN) has reduced Sacramento to once daily and Las Vegas will be delayed to July. Alaska (AS) has delayed Portland service to late July/August. PSP will operate with 9 airlines offering 14 routes for Summer 2022. Financial Summary Report — Victoria Carpenter, Airport Administration Manager • Airport Car Rental — Over $9 million achieved or this budget item compared to $6.1 million in April 2019. This is based on airport portion of the actual individual car rental price. Incredible news! • Concession RFP — Airport is on track for release of the RFP to the market on June 6th as targeted. The RFP stresses "sense of place" and local business. An airport consultant from Rincon is attending a conference in Phoenix on the launch date and will spread the word to food vendors attending the airport conference. Press releases, social media, chamber of commerce, tourist board will all be responsible for getting the word out. • Current concessions at airport — Will have a new app that one can download on their phones which will allow them to scan prices and pay for concession item on the app so that they can avoid the wait time. This should be very beneficial as lines as the coffee concession are crazy in the morning. • Overall, the financial summary looks really good with $26 million in operating revenue and $8.6 million surplus. Commissioner Request or Report — • Although City of Palm Springs is seeking to reduce the number of commission members on all commissions and originally was considering cutting the airport commission from 19 to 7 commissioners with 3 of them representing Palm Springs and the other 4 to rotate between the other valley cities and the county, it appears at this time that the Mayor of Palm Springs realizes that the airport needs to represent the entire valley and not just be governed by Palm Springs. Next Airport Commission Meeting is scheduled for June 15,2022 at 5:30 pm via teleconference. - -N REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 31 HOUSING COMMISSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, 2022 CALL TO ORDER A regular quarterly meeting of the La Quinta Housing Commission (Commission) was called to order at 4:06 p.m. by Chairperson Gaeta-Mejia. This meeting provided teleconferencing accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-60-20 and N-08-21 executed by the Governor of California, and subsequently Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361, 2021), enacted in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Commissioners Davidson, Pacheco, and Chairperson Gaeta-Mejia ABSENT: Commissioner Casto, Schuknecht STAFF PRESENT: Management Analyst Kinley, Finance Director Martinez, Management Specialist Griffin, and Commission Secretary Camarena PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairperson Gaeta-Mejia led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA Management Analyst Kinley said the City has not received any WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS or requests to provide VERBAL COMMENTS for this meeting as of 4:07 p.m. and staff would continue to monitor email communications and teleconference attendance for the duration of the meeting, should any requests by the public are received. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None HOUSING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 1 of 4 MARCH 9, 2022 CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 26, 2022 MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Davidson/Pacheco to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended. Motion passed: ayes (3), noes (0), abstain (0), absent 2 (Casto/Schuknecht). BUSINESS SESSION 1. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 HOUSING AUTHORITY YEAR-END BUDGET REPORT Finance Director Martinez presented the staff report which is on file in the City Manager's Office. Staff provided information for the Housing Authority fund, budget increase; two non -cash adjustments; former La Quinta Redevelopment Agency loan interest earnings; bond fund revenue; Housing Authority budget expenses; and an update for Dune Palms Mobile Home Park. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Davidson /Pacheco to recommend that the Housing Authority receive and file fiscal year 2020-21 housing authority year-end budget report as recommended. Motion passed: ayes (3), noes (0), abstain (0), absent 2 (Casto/Schuknecht). 2. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 MID -YEAR HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT Finance Director Martinez presented the staff report which is on file at the City Manager's Office. Staff provided an overview of the mid -year adjustments made between July and December 2021. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Davidson /Pacheco to recommend that the Housing Authority receive and file fiscal year 2021/22 mid -year housing authority budget report as recommended. Motion passed: ayes (3), noes (0), abstain (0), absent 2 (Casto/Schuknecht). 3. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION TO, AND PARTICIPATION IN, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM HOUSING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 2 of 4 MARCH 9, 2022 I Management Analyst Kinley presented the staff report which is on file at the City Manager's Office. Staff provided a brief overview of the Prohousing Designation Program and the application process. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Pacheco /Davidson to recommend that the Housing Authority adopt a resolution authorizing the application to, and participation in, the state of California's Prohousing Designation Program. Motion passed: ayes (3), noes (0), abstain (0), absent 2 (Casto/Schuknecht). 4. RECOMMEND FUNDING OPTION FOR AREA HOMELESS PREVENTION PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 Management Analyst Kinley presented the staff report which is on file at the City Manager's Office. Staff and Commission discussed the proposed allocation; the areas that Martha's Village and Kitchen (MVK), Coachella Valley Rescue Mission (CVRM) and, CV Housing First (CVAG) assist in with homeless prevention; and the pending multi -year MOU with CVAG. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Pacheco /Davidson to recommend that the Housing Authority approve funding option for Area Homeless Prevention Program for fiscal year 2022-23. Motion passed: ayes (3), noes (0), abstain (0), absent 2 (Casto/Schuknecht). STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS FUNDING OPTION FOR GALILEE CENTER Management Analyst Kinley provided a brief presentation on background for the Galilee Center and the logic behind the request for funding assistance. PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY: CFO and Co - Founder Claudia Castorena and resident Kay Wolff provided a brief overview of how the Galilee Center assists the Coachella Valley and the City of La Quinta. Commission requested more information to provide an accurate recommendation, including an onsite visit to tour the Galilee Center and view operations. STAFF REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None HOUSING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 of 4 MARCH 9, 2022 991 COMMISSIONER'S ITEMS - None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Davidson/Pacheco to adjourn the meeting at 5:27 p.m. Motion passed: ayes (3), noes (0), abstain (0), absent 2 (Casto/Schuknecht). Respectfully submitted, Kew e* Ciarwa t e*va REYNA CAMARENA, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California HOUSING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 of 4 MARCH 9, 2022 992 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 32 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 2022 CALL TO ORDER A regular quarterly meeting of the Financial Advisory Commission (Commission) was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chairperson Batavick. This meeting provided teleconferencing accessibility pursuant to Executive Orders N-60-20 and N-08-21 executed by the Governor of California, and subsequently Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361, 2021), enacted in response to the state of emergency relating to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). PRESENT: Commissioners Anderson, Mast, Mills, Way, and Chairperson Batavick ABSENT: Commissioner Dorsey VACANCY: One STAFF PRESENT: Finance Director Martinez, Financial Services Analyst Hallick, Account Technician Batuta, and Management Assistant Delgado. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Mills led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Financial Services Analyst said that the title for Consent Calendar Item No. 2 should read as follows: "Receive and File Revenue and Expenditure Report Dated February 28, 2022" The Commission concurred. FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES Page 1 of 4 MAY 11, 2022 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING I ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES DATED APRIL 13, 2022 2. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2022 Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Way/Mills to approve the Consent Calendar, with the amended title for Consent Calendar Item No. 2 as noted above. Motion passed: ayes - 5, noes - 0, absent - 1 (Dorsey), vacancy - 1. BUSINESS SESSION 1. REVIEW AND APPROVE THE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 MEETING DATES Finance Director Martinez presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. The Commission discussed the process on how to request approval for being absent at a regular Commission meeting. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Way/Mast to approve the fiscal year 2022/23 Commission meeting dates as submitted. Motion passed: ayes - 5, noes - 0, absent - 1 (Dorsey), vacancy - 1. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS THE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 INVESTMENT POLICY (Policy) Financial Services Analyst Hallick presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. The Commission and staff discussed state and government code for investments and how government funds are governed. Commissioner Mills mentioned the importance of reviewing the Policy as it is a component of one of the principal functions of the Commission. FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES Page 2 of 4 MAY 11, 2022 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING .. I Further discussion followed on state code guidelines and the timeline for approving and publishing the fiscal year 2022/23 Policy. 2. REVIEW AND DISCUSS 10-YEAR FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND Finance Director Martinez presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. The Commission and staff discussed current police services cost; revenue and expenditure projections; transient occupant tax (TOT) revenue; and growth projections percentages. Chair Batavick mentioned that input for the 10-year projections (Projections) starts at the City's Annual Community Workshop (Workshop). Staff noted the Projections are generally provided to the Commission prior to the Workshop. The Commission and staff discussed having a future study session for Projections showing three different types of scenarios including worse case, best case, and a more likely comparison. Further discussion followed on police services cost, and what is included; and reimbursements for police services for special events. Chair Batavick said that he and Commissioner Way assisted with the Projections document included as Handout 1 of the staff report and mentioned on page 4, under Net Cash Position, it reflects the impact of the Redevelopment Agency Loan proceeds. 3. DISCUSS FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED BUDGET Finance Director Martinez presented the staff report, which is on file in the Finance Department. The Commission and staff discussed inflation; expense increases; sales tax; and wage increases. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS All reports are on file in the finance department. 1. FINANCE DEPARTMENT CURRENT AND FUTURE INITIATIVES FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 of 4 MAY 11, 2022 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING 995 Finance Director Martinez announced effective Monday, May 16, 2022, the City recruited a new Accounting Manager in the Finance Department who will be introduced at a future Commission meeting. Chair Batavick inquired on the review of the City's pension liability. Staff said that this item would be placed on the agenda for a future Commission meeting. Further discussion followed on the process for how pension obligation discount rate is established. 2. FOURTH QUARTER 2021 (OCTOBER-DECEMBER) SALES TAX UPDATE FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA Financial Services Analyst Hallick said the City's forecast Measure G at approximately 110-115% of sales tax, and the trend has been closer to 120% due to shifts in buying patterns. COMMISSIONERS' ITEMS Chair Batavick mentioned his term expires in June 2022, and he has reapplied for another term. He also announced the current vacancy and encouraged those interested to apply to serve on the Commission. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mills/Way to adjourn this meeting at 5:34 p.m. Motion passed: ayes - 5, noes - 0, absent - 1 (Dorsey), vacancy - 1. Respectfully submitted, Jessica Delgado, Management Assistant City of La Quinta, California FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 of 4 MAY 11, 2022 REGULAR QUARTERLY MEETING POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 7, 2022 June 7, 2022 1 City Council Meeting June 7, 2022 City Council Meeting June 7, 2022 Closed Session 1 2 June 7, 2022 2 Pledge of Allegiance Public Comment - Teleconference Join virtually via Zoom https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82540879912 Meeting ID: 825 4087 9912 “Raise Hand” to speak Limit Comments to 3 minutes 3 4 June 7, 2022 3 Public Comment - Teleconference Join virtually via Zoom by phone: (253) 215 - 8782 Meeting ID: 825 4087 9912 *9 = Raise Hand; *6 = Unmute Limit Comments to 3 minutes Public Comment – Raise Hand 5 6 June 7, 2022 4 Public Comment – Raise Hand Public Comment Via Teleconference In Progress https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82540879912 Meeting ID: 825 4087 9912 Telephone: (253) 215-8782 “Raise Hand” to request to speak *9 = Raise Hand; *6 = Unmute Limit Comments to 3 minutes 7 8 June 7, 2022 5 City Council Meeting June 7, 2022 B1 – Adopt Resolution to accept Certificate of Sufficiency of the Initiative Measure Overview •Jan. 12, 2022 – a Notice of Intent to circulate an initiative petition the “Phase-Out & Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted STVRs in Non-Exempt Areas in the City” by Dec. 31, 2024 •Apr. 21, 2022 – proponents filed petition with City •ROV completed full signature verification & has prepared the Certificate of Sufficiency of the Initiative 9 10 June 7, 2022 6 City Council Meeting – June 7, 2022 B2 – Receive & File Report, pursuant to Elec. Code section 9212, Assessing the Fiscal, Economic, & Related Impacts of the Initiative Measure “Phase-Out & Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted STVRs in Non-Exempt Areas in La Quinta” by 12/31/2024 11 12 June 7, 2022 7 Overview •March 15, 2022 – Council authorized report, per Elections Code section 9212, to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative proposing the “Phase-Out and Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted STVRs in Non-Exempt Areas in the City,” by December 31, 2024 •May 24, 2022 – City received report Market Trends in Greater Palm Springs Month of February Hotel Revenue ($Millions) The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc. 13 14 June 7, 2022 8 Market Trends in Greater Palm Springs Month of February Hotel Occupancy Rate (Non-STRs) The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc. Methodology/Approach •Gather data on direct STR accommodations spending (and other information) – AllTheRooms is the vendor/source. Remove data on studios/one- bedrooms to address hotel substitution effect. •Use the direct STR accommodations spending as the lever to estimate additional local direct visitor spending, e.g, “for every dollar of STR accommodations spending, an additional $1.43 is spent locally on food & beverage, entertainment, retail, arts & culture, etc.” Tourism Economics previous work on regional STR spending is the source (consistent with other sources such as US Travel & Tourism Satellite Accounts maintained by Census Bureau). Reduce the estimation of local spending on STRs themselves to account for leakage to non-resident owners. •Use the direct spending outlined above as inputs into an input-output model specific to Riverside County that allows estimation of the “ripple effects.” Bureau of Economic Analysis RIMS II Multiplier System maintained by the Census Bureau is the source. •Results measured in top-line revenue, local equivalent of GDP, earnings by proprietors and workers, and jobs. Local tax revenue then calculated. The Flow of Economic Impacts Direct +Indirect +Induced =Total The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta 15 16 June 7, 2022 9 Direct Local STR Footprint •Rapid growth through the pandemic – while supply declines slightly, all demand measures rise. •Room-nights rise 25% from 2019 to 2021, RevPAN increases 30% over same period, leading to 63% revenue increase The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta Available Room-Nights Room-Nights Gross Revenues RevPAN 2019 2,339,419 178,880 $71,198,197 $398.02 2020 2,076,519 210,676 $92,410,922 $438.64 2021 1,973,016 223,598 $116,166,717 $519.53 Sources: AllTheRooms (https://www.alltherooms.com/analytics); TXP, Inc. Note: “Room-nights” in this context refers to the number of bedrooms available, eg, a 3-bedroom property would have 3 room-nights available for a given date. Additional Direct STR-related Spending The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta Direct accommodations spending of visitors: $116.2 million (net $58.5 million) Reduced by $57.7 million to out-of-town owners $87 million in additional direct visitor spending Breakdown by major industry/category in the pie chart $145.5 million total direct visitor spending Colored pie slices represent local direct STR-related spending: $145.5 million total 17 18 June 7, 2022 10 Local 2021 STR Economic Impact ($Millions) •Impact spread throughout the local economy, though concentrated in consumer sectors. •Tax impacts proportionately higher. •Total annual loss - $6.1m. •Lodging (TOT) tax •$5.9m currently •Loss of 80% under proposed ban - $4.7m •Sales tax •$1.4 loss The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta Output Value-Added Earnings Jobs Agriculture, etc. $0.4 $0.2 $0.1 2 Mining NA NA NA NA Utilities $4.0 $2.3 $0.4 2 Construction $3.3 $1.6 $0.9 12 Durable Manufacturing $2.5 $1.0 $0.4 6 Non-Durable Manufacturing $4.5 $1.4 $0.5 9 Wholesale Trade $4.5 $2.8 $0.8 9 Retail Trade $28.8 $16.6 $7.4 203 Transportation & Warehousing $6.3 $2.7 $1.5 50 Information $2.6 $1.4 $0.4 4 Finance & Insurance $3.2 $2.0 $0.7 7 Real Estate $59.1 $40.9 $7.1 191 Professional Services $3.3 $2.4 $1.3 16 Management of Firms $1.1 $0.7 $0.2 2 Administrative & Waste Services $10.2 $13.7 $7.6 153 Educational Services $1.0 $0.7 $0.4 9 Health Services $6.3 $4.1 $2.2 39 Arts/Entertainment/Recreation $16.0 $8.6 $4.3 140 Accommodation $1.0 $0.7 $0.3 6 Food Services $42.0 $20.4 $9.7 385 Other Services $3.6 $2.1 $1.0 21 Households NA NA NA 3 Total Annual $203.8 $126.3 $47.0 1,271 Questions? Impact Summary The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta STRs bring economic and fiscal benefits to La Quinta that will be lost, at least to some significant degree, by limiting legal STR operations to restricted areas such as those proposed in the petition. Bans typically do not eliminate unwanted STR activity, but removal of oversight and tax collection means they do eliminate most of the benefit to local taxpayers while increasing municipal costs. These unintended consequences, as well as the potential losses, should be carefully considered. 19 20 June 7, 2022 11 Questions/Comments This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC 21 22 June 7, 2022 12 City Council Meeting – June 7, 2022 B3 – Adopt Resolutions to: 1) Call election for the Initiative; 2) order Impartial Analysis, Set Priorities for Written Arguments and Rebuttals; and 3) Request consolidation of the election with Riverside County Overview •June 7, 2022 – Council adopted resolution accepting the Certificate of Sufficiency that the Initiative Ordinance & Ballot Measure has qualified to be placed on the ballot for the November 8, 2022 election 23 24 June 7, 2022 13 Overview Proposed are resolutions to: 1) Submit the Initiative to the qualified electors of the City at the General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022 2) Direct the City Attorney to prepare an Impartial Analysis 3) Set priorities for filing written arguments and rebuttals 4) Request that Riverside County consolidate this with the General Municipal Election & the Statewide General Election of November 8, 2022 Questions/Comments This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC 25 26 June 7, 2022 14 City Council Meeting June 7, 2022 S1 – Discuss Fiscal Year 2022/23 Preliminary Proposed Budget 27 28 June 7, 2022 15 •General Fund Update •Special Funds •Capital Improvement Fund Discussion Topics General Fund Update Revenues 67,821,100$ Less Operating/CIP Expenses (64,056,424) Preliminary Budget Surplus 3,764,676 Less Measure G Reserves (3,353,000) BUDGET SURPLUS 411,676$ GENERAL FUND FY 2022/23 PROPOSED BUDGET •Staff is currently evaluating costs for additional benches and workout stations at the Cove and potential grant funding •Pending final amounts for contract services such as Police, Fire, and insurance premiums 29 30 June 7, 2022 16 Special Funds •Gas Tax Fund •Lighting and Landscape Fund •Finance Authority Fund •Library & Museum Fund •Measure A Fund •Development Impact Fee (DIF) Funds Capital Improvement Plan 2022/23 through 2026/27 CIP Plan discussed on April 5, 2022 Focus on transportation and parks & facilities projects 2022/23 Summary Funding Capital Projects $14,036,811 Landscape Improvements $500,000 Developer Reimbursements $400,000 TOTAL $13,136,811 31 32 June 7, 2022 17 Discussion & Questions May 17 City Council - All Budget Appropriations June 1 Financial Advisory Commission - Measure G Sales Tax Use June 8 Housing Commission - Final Review of Housing Budget June 21 City Council – Final Budget Adoption 33 34 June 7, 2022 18 Housing Authority Meeting June 7, 2022 S2 – Discuss Fiscal Year 2022/23 Proposed Budget Revenue Projections Fund 241 – Adjustments to rent revenue & reduction in interest earnings Fund 243 – Includes annual loan repayment $673,936 & reduction in interest earnings Fund 249 – Reduction in interest earnings due to HWY 111 land purchase Housing Fund Revenues 2021/22 Original 2021/22 Current Variance Original vs. Current 2022/23 Proposed Variance Current vs. Proposed % Change 241 - Housing Authority 871,400 1,666,400 795,000 1,451,500 (214,900) -13% 243 - RDA Low-Mod Housing 35,000 35,000 - 20,000 (15,000) -43% 249 - SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond 201,000 201,000 - 25,000 (176,000) -88% Total Revenues 1,107,400 1,902,400 795,000 1,496,500 (405,900) -21% RDA Loan Repayment 660,722 660,722 - 673,936 13,214 Total Operating Revenues 1,768,122 2,563,122 795,000 2,170,436 (392,686) 35 36 June 7, 2022 19 Expense Projections Fund 241 – Professional services, legal fees, upgrades and repairs, insurances, salaries & benefits, information technology charges Fund 243 – Homelessness funding, no change Fund 249 - Evaluate future affordable housing projects, no anticipated land purchases Housing Fund Expenditures 2021/22 Original 2021/22 Current Variance Original vs. Current 2022/23 Proposed Variance Current vs. Proposed % Change 241 - Housing Authority 1,542,200 1,761,200 219,000 1,712,670 (48,530) -3% 243 - RDA Low-Mod Housing 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 - 0% 249 - SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond 20,000 8,650,545 8,630,545 20,000 (8,630,545) -100% Total Expenditures 1,812,200 10,661,745 8,849,545 1,982,670 (8,679,075) -81% Housing Fund Balances FUND # FUND NAME ESTIMATED AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE July 1, 2022 ESTIMATED REVENUES ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE June 30, 2023 241 HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND 12,000,000 1,451,500 1,712,670 11,738,830 243 RDA LOW-MOD HOUSING FUND 3,000,000 693,936 250,000 3,443,936 249 SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND 2,900,000 25,000 20,000 2,905,000 17,900,000 2,170,436 1,982,670 18,087,766 CITY OF LA QUINTA ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCES FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2023 GRAND TOTAL * General Fund and RDA Low-Mod Housing Fund estimates are for unappropriated reserves and included annual Successor Agency loan repayments as approved with the last and final recognized obligation payment schedule. The repayment for FY 2022/23 is $673,936. 37 38 June 7, 2022 20 FY 2022/23 Proposed Budget Next Steps •Housing Commission review & approval on 06/08/2022 •Budget Adoption on 06/21/2022 •Monitor and adjust as needed For the latest budget information visit: www.laquintaca.gov/business/finance/budget 39 40 June 7, 2022 21 City Council Meeting June 7, 2022 PH1 –Coral Mountain Resort Project Background •Andalusia Specific Plan approved by County, annexed by City 20 years ago •Project includes 929 acres •Project includes six applications to result in a master planned resort community on 386 acres. 41 42 June 7, 2022 22 Background Specific Plan Amendment •Remove 386 acres from the 929 acre Andalusia Specific Plan •No change to the development potential of Andalusia •West side of Madison Street, if removed from the Specific Plan, subject to six applications including new Specific Plan 43 44 June 7, 2022 23 General Plan Amendment and Zone Change Table 1 Existing and Proposed Land Uses General Plan/Zoning Exist. Acres Proposed Acres General Commercial/ Neighborhood Commercial 8.4 7.7 Low Density Residential/ Low Density Residential 204.2 232.3 Open Space Recreation/ Golf Course 171.9 0 Open Space Recreation/ Parks & Recreation 0 23.6 Tourist Commercial/ Tourist Commercial 0 120.8 Existing Proposed Specific Plan •Includes development standards and guidelines to allow: –Up to 600 residential units –Up to 150 hotel rooms –Up to 60,000 SF of Neighborhood Commercial uses –Up to 57,000 SF of resort commercial uses –A 16.6 acre artificial surf basin –26.5 acre “back of house” area south of wave basin and hotel for temporary structures and parking –24 acres of open space 45 46 June 7, 2022 24 Specific Plan •Establishes Development Standards and Guidelines for 386 acres •Divides the site into 4 planning areas: •PA-I: Neighborhood Commercial •PA-II: 496 low density units: single family, clustered units, condos or townhomes •PA-III: Tourist commercial, including hotel, resort residential, wave basin, resort commercial and back of house •PA-IV: Open space including passive and active recreation, trail Specific Plan •Development to be phased •SDP for wave basin, resort residential in PA-III and part of PA-I submitted and under review •Future SDPs for hotel, residential units •Provides for on-site and perimeter roadway improvements 47 48 June 7, 2022 25 Specific Plan •Contemporary design aesthetic •Establishes allowance for 4 special events per year, with up to 2,500 attendees (in addition to residents and hotel guests) with Temporary Use Permit requirement. Specific Plan •Hierarchy of landscaping styles, from native to more manicured desert style 49 50 June 7, 2022 26 Tentative Tract Map •Subdivides entire 386 acres –Neighborhood commercial –26 single family lots –104 resort residential lots –Lots for hotel, wave basin –Backbone streets •Future subdivision for resort commercial, single family residential, back of house area Development Agreement A contract between applicant and the City that: •Guarantees the implementation of mitigation measures and conditions of approval •Allows STVRs for all residential units •Establishes mitigation fees to cover costs of providing services to the project •Proposes a development schedule •Assures that Wave machinery would be dismantled if the basin is no longer in use 51 52 June 7, 2022 27 Construction Schedule Table 2 Development Agreement Performance Schedule Summary Project Component Years Wave Basin and some resort residential and hotel development (quantities undefined) 3-5 Completion of hotel and balance of resort residential (quantities undefined) 5-10 8,000± SF of Neighborhood Commercial 3-6 220 single family units in Planning Area 2 8-15 11,000± SF Neighborhood Commercial 9-12 250 single family units in Planning Area 2 (balance of single family units) 15-22 41,000± SF Neighborhood Commercial 20-23 Planning Commission Concerns The Commission had three primary concerns: •The number of STVRs, particularly in Planning Area II (single family homes) vs. Tourist Commercial. •The lighting and 80 foot light poles. –Analysis shows that a “glow” will be visible above the project from Avenue 58, from Madison at Andalusia, and from Avenue 60, but not from the south end of Madison. •Water supplies for the project, particularly long term demand in light of current drought conditions. 53 54 June 7, 2022 28 Vacation Rentals Table 2 Summary of Revenues and Costs Revenues:Phase I Phase II Phase III Build Out Total Annual Revenues at Phase Buildout $1,754,758 $1,895,137 $2,130,995 $2,078,195 Costs: Total Annual Costs at Phase Build Out $594,437 $594,434 $1,592,234 $1,592,234 Annual Cash Flow at Phase Build Out $1,160,321 $1,300,703 $538,761 $485,961 Annual Cash Flow with No Transient Occupancy Tax Revenue -$273,034 -$132,652 -$894,594 -$947,394 Lighting 55 56 June 7, 2022 29 Lighting Lighting 57 58 June 7, 2022 30 Lighting Purpose of Water Supply Assessment (WSA) •Purpose of WSA is to comply with the requirements of SB610 and SB221, which require detailed information on water availability to be provided to City decision-makers prior to approval of large development projects. •Under SB610 and SB1262, WSAs must be furnished to City decision-makers for inclusion in any environmental documentation prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for certain projects. 59 60 June 7, 2022 31 CEQA Requirements for WSAs •CEQA §15155 requires: –that development projects in excess of 500 dwelling units, 500,000 square feet of commercial space, 500 hotel rooms, or the equivalent water demands must prepare WSAs. –the City to consult with the relevant “public water system” and request a determination whether the project’s water demands are considered in the agency’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and approval of a WSA. –that the WSA be in the CEQA document being considered for the project. CEQA Requirements for WSAs –(1) Sufficient information regarding the project’s proposed water demand and proposed water supplies to permit the lead agency to evaluate the pros and cons of supplying the amount of water that the project will need. –(2) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of supplying water throughout all phases of the project. –(3) An analysis of circumstances affecting the likelihood of the water’s availability, as well as the degree of uncertainty involved. –(4) If the lead agency cannot determine that a particular water supply will be available, it shall conduct an analysis of alternative sources, including at least in general terms the environmental consequences of using those alternative sources, or alternatives to the project that could be served with available water. 61 62 June 7, 2022 32 Typical Outline for WSA •1. Introduction –Senate Bill 610 / Senate Bill 221 –Overview of Water System –Project Description •2. Current and Projected Water Supply –Groundwater –Surface Water –Imported Water –Recycled Water –Other Supplies •3. Current and Projected Water Demand •Methodology •Land Use and Demographics •Water Conservation •Water Demand •4. Supply and Demand Comparison •Normal Year •Single and Multiple Dry Years •Water Shortage Contingency Plan •5. Conclusions and Verification Demand Information in the WSA •Historical water demand data for the Project site, or, if unavailable, detailed historical land use information. •Proposed number of residential units, commercial square footage, hotel rooms, and other water demands (including onsite lakes) for the project. •Estimate of the volume of water demands associated with the proposed land uses. 63 64 June 7, 2022 33 Typical Sources for Supply Analysis •Urban Water Management Plan –Demand Forecast –Single & Multiple Dry Year Assessment –Drought Contingency Analysis •Other water supply or water management plans Findings to be Made Adequacy of CEQA document and associated WSA in addressing long- term water supply availability 65 66 June 7, 2022 34 Environmental Impact Report •Draft EIR was available for public comments for 45 days. •Received just under 100 comment letters. •Completed Response to Comments/Final EIR. –Comments addressed multiple issue areas, and were all addressed. –Concerns by CDFW resulted in addition of a Bighorn Sheep fence, landscaping restrictions added to Specific Plan. –No change in the overall severity of impacts identified. Environmental Issues Aesthetics, Light and Glare •Project will block views of Coral Mountain •Project proposes 80 foot light poles around the wave pool. The lighting analysis shows that the light levels will be contained on the site. 67 68 June 7, 2022 35 Environmental Issues Cultural Resources & Tribal Resources •Multiple archaeological and historic sites identified on and immediately adjacent to the property. •Extensive mitigation program required prior to any ground disturbing activity to protect resources in situ, conduct extensive testing, and prepare National Register of Historic Places applications. Environmental Issues Noise •Project noise impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated. •Operational noise levels meet General Plan standards for surrounding communities, due to distance. •Mitigation measures: construction, wave pool hours 7 AM to 10 PM, wall on north and east boundary. 69 70 June 7, 2022 36 Environmental Issues •Project will be required to install traffic signals at Madison & Avenue 58 and Madison and Main Entry at build out. •Additional improvements required at 9 other intersections, fair share/DIF. •For special events, all improvements must be in place or traffic analysis provided with TUP, traffic management required. Traffic •Analysis conducted for phased build out. •Project generates 6,994 trips at buildout, 8,932 trips during special events. Improvement Location Timing Traffic signal Madison and Avenue 54 Phase 1 Traffic signal Jefferson and Avenue 54 Phase 1 Roundabout striping/2 lanes Jefferson and Avenue 52 Phase 1 Add 1 west- bound through lane Jefferson and Avenue 50 Buildout Traffic signal Monroe and Avenue 60 Buildout Traffic signal Monroe and Avenue 58 Phase 2 Traffic signal Monroe and Airport Buildout Traffic signal Monroe and Avenue 54 Phase 1 Traffic signal Monroe and Avenue 52 Phase 1 Environmental Issues Water Resources •A Water Supply Assessment was prepared and approved by CVWD. •Water demand of the project will be 958.63 acre-feet per year. •CVWD has sufficient water supplies to serve the project during normal, single dry and multiple dry years from multiple water sources, including groundwater and supplemental allocations. 71 72 June 7, 2022 37 Environmental Issues All impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels except: •Aesthetics - Impacts to views of Coral Mountain •Greenhouse Gas Emissions •These impacts remain significant and unavoidable. Under CEQA, the City Council must determine whether the benefits of the project outweigh its significant impacts. Recommendation A. Adopt a resolution making Findings and approving a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2021020310). B. Adopt a resolution approving Specific Plan (SP) 2019-0003, General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2019-0002, Zone Change (ZC) 2019-0004, Specific Plan (SP) 2020-0002 and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 2019- 0005 for the Coral Mountain Resort project. C. (1) Move to take up an ordinance, by title and number only and waive further reading, approving Zone Change (ZC) 2019-0004. C. (2) Move to introduce an ordinance to approve ZC 2019-0004. D. (1) Move to take up an ordinance, by title and number only and waive further reading, approving a development agreement for the Coral Mountain Resort project. D. (2) Move to introduce at first reading an ordinance approving a development agreement for the Coral Mountain Resort project. 73 74 June 7, 2022 38 Visual Simulations From Avenue 58 at Lion’s Gate 75 76 June 7, 2022 39 Visual Simulations From Madison Street at Andalusia DRD Park and Trail 77 78 June 7, 2022 40 CORAL MOUNTAIN La Quinta, CA   Introduction 79 80 June 7, 2022 41 Overview 8 2History of the Coral Mountain Specific Plan Area - Circa 2000History of the Coral Mountain Specific Plan Area - Circa 2000 Trilogy – South View CM Wave – West View Trilogy – West View Andalusia – South View CM Wave – South View Andalusia – West View Panoramic View - South to Northwest 81 82 June 7, 2022 42 The vision for Coral Mountain is to create a next-generation master-planned community with an expansive offering of lifestyle experiences in adventure sports and wellness. Woven into the fabric of Coral Mountain is a commitment to both authenticity and approachability – an adventure sports mecca, curated by the best minds in each sport, vertically integrated into an experience that simply does not currently exist in La Quinta, the Coachella Valley, or anywhere else in the world. KEYWORDS •Longevity •Quality of Life •Health & Well-Being •Community Aesthetic •Adventure Sports •Unique Experiences •Social Connection •Authenticity •Sustainability •Durability 8 3Core Vision & ProgramCore Vision & Program 8 4 Master Plan Sustainability Architecture Sports & Wellness Pillars of the Vision 83 84 June 7, 2022 43 8 5VISION PILLAR: Master PlanVISION PILLAR: Master Plan Site Organization Community Entry The Corner Village Residential Estates Surf Village/Lodge Sports and Wellness 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 3 3 6 1 2 5 4 future residential (phase 2) future residential (phase 2) Site Design: The Vibe •Desert Resort −Not a “resort in the desert” •Reflective of Coachella Valley Traditions −Plant palette, materials, and scale •Water Responsive | Drought Resistant •Native and Productive: not manicured 8 6Master Plan: Site Design Philosophy 85 86 June 7, 2022 44 Master Plan: Water Conserving Arid Plan Palette Village Landscape 8 7 Desert Revegetation Desert Garden Desert Oasis 8 8Multi-Modal Connectivity ThroughoutMaster Plan: 87 88 June 7, 2022 45 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS LINK ALL RESORT RESIDENTIAL HOMES TO THE WAVE BASIN AND SURF VILLAGE 8 9Master Plan: Connectivity – The Walk StreetsMaster Plan: Connectivity – The Walk Streets 9 0Master Plan: Coral Mtn Public Trail ConnectionMaster Plan: Coral Mtn Public Trail Connection Source: Desert Recreation District Notes 1. Concept Planning for Coral Mountain Park provided by Desert Recreation District. 2. Coral Mountain Wave trail alignment is conceptual and subject to additional consultation with City of La Quinta, Desert Recreation District, CAFW, and ACBCI 3. CM Trail connection highlighted in red. 89 90 June 7, 2022 46 9 1VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITYVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Wave Basin = 120 AFY 9 2 Golf Course = 1,100 – 1,200 AFY VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water UseVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water Use 18-Hole Golf Course Water Use v. the Wave1 Estimated Annual Water Use (Acre-Feet-per-Year)2 1 Current SP Approval v. Proposed Plan 2 Wave Basin water demand source: Approved Water Verification and Supply Assessment GC average water demand source: CV industry averages AF > Gallons Conversion Factor: 1 AF = 325,851 gallons 91 92 June 7, 2022 47 Indoor v. Outdoor Water Use* Indoor 15% Outdo or 85% * From Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification approved by CVWD April 14, 2020 9 3 Commer… Open Space 32% Residen tial 45% Resort 4% Wave 13% Commerci al 4% Open Space 37% Residenti al 43% Resort 1% Wave 15% Total Water Use* Outdoor Water Use Only* VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water UseVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water Use •The Wave gets all the attention…but is only 13% of the total water use. •The largest single water user is Residential, but most of that is outside the home. •“Open Space” (landscape common area) is next in order of highest use. •The real story is maximizing water efficiencies in other areas of the outdoor “water use profile” besides the Wave Basin. 9 4VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water UseVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water Use How Coral Mountain’s “Water Use Profile” will be an example of water-responsible development in the Coachella Valley: Modern low- flow fixtures in homes with latest technology Wave can use Non-Potable source water Maximize Outdoor Non- Potable Water Use Plan for availability of Recycled Water from CVWD although there are no current plans for our area. 93 94 June 7, 2022 48 9 5 Notes 1. Area calcs derived from lake geometry using USGS GIS data. 2. Coral Mountain area assumes Wave Basin water surface area + 2 water features. 3. Evaporation calculated using CVWD factors for still (lakes) and moving water (WB). PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water UsePILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water Use Source: MSA Consulting Graphs derived from data prepared by MSA Consulting using USGS GIS and MAWA factors for calculating evaporation from CVWD 9 6VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water UseVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water Use Comparison – Wave Basin as Recreational Water Body A C. AF/Y R 95 96 June 7, 2022 49 •No New Projects = Baseline •Baseline w/ Climate Change •Five-Year w/ Climate Change •Future Projects w/ Climate Change •Expanded Ag w/ Climate Change •Simulations of additional scenarios with 5-year (near- term) projects, future projects, and expanded agriculture •Additional scenarios include climate change/drought, reduced reliability on imported water supplies Source: Approval of Updated Groundwater Management Plan, 12-7-2021, submitted to CA Dept. of Water Resources 9 7VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water UseVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water Use “The Plan Update demonstrates that the GSAs can meet the established Plan Goal “to meet current and future water demands in a cost-effective and sustainable manner. As they have been doing over the last 20 years, GSAs will monitor trends in demand and supply availability and implement PMAs as needed.” “The Plan Update demonstrates that the GSAs can meet the established Plan Goal “to meet current and future water demands in a cost-effective and sustainable manner. As they have been doing over the last 20 years, GSAs will monitor trends in demand and supply availability and implement PMAs as needed.” Regarding Groundwater Basin Sustainability… 9 8 Source: Approval of Updated Groundwater Management Plan, 12-7-2021, submitted to CA Dept. of Water Resources VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water UseVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water Use 97 98 June 7, 2022 50 Source: CVWD 9 9 Notes 1. Total Annual Groundwater Pumping from municipal (CVWD) and Private Wells for domestic and private irrigation, including golf courses 2. CVWD HH (domestic) consumption factor avg at 55/gal/pp/day * per capita 2.6 persons per HH (LQGP household size) 3. Groundwater Production of other CM Specific Plan parcels between 490,000,000- 980,000,000Million Gallons in 2020-21 ENLARGED AREA VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water UseVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY – Water Use What’s happening in the local area water use- wise? 1 0 0 Coral Mountain is reducing its peak kW load demand from the IID power grid through massive engagement of passive and active design features. Cal-Green (“Title 24”) CA Building Code requirements will be exceeded to achieve an equivalent electrical load reduction of an estimated 60%. The resulting emission reductions of an estimated 4,000 metric tons of carbon (CO2) represent the equivalent of removing more than 850 cars off the road annually. VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY - EnergyVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY - Energy 99 100 June 7, 2022 51 HOW: Residential •Energy recovery ventilators •Variable refrigerant flow for cooling and heating •High performance glazing •Deep shaded windows •CalGreen PV requirements PLUS battery storage (microgrid) •Air source heat pump for hot water •Solar power/hot water (pool heating) •Insulated Pool cover •Smart building controls Village •Energy recovery ventilators •Evaporative cooling/natural ventilation •High performance glazing •Deep shaded windows •CalGreen PV requirements plus battery storage (microgrid) •Air source heat pump hot water •Smart building controls (tied to occupancy) Village – to be added/considered •Wastewater heat recovery Hotel •Energy recovery ventilators •Variable refrigerant flow for heating and cooling •High performance glazing •Deep shaded windows •CalGreen PV requirements plus battery storage (microgrid) •Air source heat pump hot water •Smart building controls (tied to occupancy) Hotel – to be added/considered •Wastewater heat recovery •Evaporative cooling/natural ventilation for lobby/restaurant •Pool load and solar heating for pool VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY - EnergyVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY - Energy 1 0 1 1 0 2VISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY - EnergyVISION PILLAR: SUSTAINABILITY - Energy The Pathway to electrical load and carbon reduction at Coral Mountain… Coral Mtn is hereRESULTS 101 102 June 7, 2022 52 •Desert Modern •Integrated into the Sonoran Desert Landscape −Color, Materials, Tones, Textures, and Scale •Climate Responsive | High Performance −Uses Less Energy Than Code •Rugged and Imperfect: Crafted By Hand 1 0 3VISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – The VibeVISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – The Vibe Architectural Design: The Vibe OVERVIEW MASTERPLAN Community Entry The Corner Village Residential Estates Surf Village/Lodge Sports and Wellness 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 0 4VISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – Development ComponentsVISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – Development Components 6 3 3 6 1 2 5 4 future residential (phase 2) future residential (phase 2) 103 104 June 7, 2022 53 1 0 5VISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – Community EntryVISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – Community Entry 1 1 0 6Community Entry – Style Inferences: Agrarian SimplicityCommunity Entry – Style Inferences: Agrarian Simplicity 105 106 June 7, 2022 54 1 0 7VISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – The CornerVISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – The Corner 2 1 0 8The Corner – Farm-Based Neighborhood Market & Community Gathering SpotThe Corner – Farm-Based Neighborhood Market & Community Gathering Spot The Bodega Market – Outdoor Gathering Space The Bodega Market – Farm The Bodega Market The Bodega Market 107 108 June 7, 2022 55 1 0 9 Estates Village Homes Boardwalk Homes Phase I Residential Product Areas C A A B B A B C VISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – ResidentialVISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – Residential 3 4 future residential (phase 2) future residential (phase 2) 1 1 0Residential - Village Homes – Open Air and Courtyard DesignsResidential - Village Homes – Open Air and Courtyard Designs 3 3 109 110 June 7, 2022 56 1 1 1Residential - Boardwalk Homes Fronting on the Wave BasinResidential - Boardwalk Homes Fronting on the Wave Basin 3 3 1 1 2Residential - EstatesResidential - Estates 4 111 112 June 7, 2022 57 1 1 3VISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – Surf Village/LodgeVISION PILLAR: ARCHITECTURE – Surf Village/Lodge 5 1 1 4VISION PILLAR: SPORTS and WELLNESS – Activity and MovementVISION PILLAR: SPORTS and WELLNESS – Activity and Movement 6 Sports and Wellness 113 114 June 7, 2022 58 Sports and Wellness •The Stoke•The Science 1 1 5VISION PILLAR: SPORTS and WELLNESS – The WAVEVISION PILLAR: SPORTS and WELLNESS – The WAVE 6 The WAVE: The ScienceThe WAVE: The Science 1.The Wave is generated over underwater topography referred to as Bathymetry. The shape of the Wave varies across the extents of the basin as either an open face or barreling wave 2.The Wave System’s main wave generating component is The Hydrofoil which travels from one end of the basin to the other to generate both right and left breaking waves. A safety barrier system separates surfers from wave system areas 3.Damping Features are incorporated throughout the perimeter of the wave basin to settle water activity as quickly and safely as possible ahead of next wave launch 4.Key geometric features within the bathymetry which appear as Reefs along the length of basin support forming very specific waves along discrete sections within the wave ride 5.The Liner System of the wave basin is designed to contain water within the basin and allow for safe ingress and egress and is primarily composed of concrete and a liner membrane system 6.Winches, at either end of the wave system track assembly, powered by motors and drives, pull the hydrofoil from one end to other to generate right and left breaking waves 6 1 1 6 Hydrofo il Dampin g Reef Liner Winche s Bathymetry 115 116 June 7, 2022 59 The Wave The StokeThe Stoke 1 1 7 MARKET DIFFERENTIATION: A diverse, robust La Quinta economy JOBS: Construction and permanent CITY PERMIT AND IMPACT FEES: Estimated to be in the millions of dollars GENERAL FUND REVENUE: Local Sales Tax and TOT with Mitigation Payment backstop 1 1 8 Benefits to La Quinta Coral Mountain provides benefits to the CityCoral Mountain provides benefits to the City 117 118 June 7, 2022 60 Benefits to La Quinta $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 Annual Revenues Annual Costs Annual Cash Flows NOTES 1 The cost of services "per capita", or per person in the City based on contracts and adopted budgets 2 Revenue from tax sources accruing to the City's General Fund * Source Data Service Costs & GF Revenues - Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis, COLQ City of La Quinta Finance Dept. 1 1 9BENEFITS TO LA QUINTA – General Fund RevenueBENEFITS TO LA QUINTA – General Fund Revenue Coral Mountain pays its own way, and then some… Benefits to La Quinta$3,474,320 $14,500 $10,500 $1,593,716 $1,094,351 $2,630,693 $1,880,605 ($1,079,851) ($2,620,193)($3,000,000) ($2,000,000) ($1,000,000) $0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 Coral Mountain Andalusia Trilogy Annual Revenues Annual Costs Annual Cash Flows 1 2 0 c o s t s r e v e n u e c a s h f l o w BENEFITS TO LA QUINTA – A Solution for an Historic Fiscal IssueBENEFITS TO LA QUINTA – A Solution for an Historic Fiscal Issue Coral Mountain will help address the holdover County RDA property tax annexation bug by generating revenue in excess of its governmental service costs that accrue to the City’s General Fund. 119 120 June 7, 2022 61 1 2 1 The Bottom Line Passes CEQA Test Differentiated High Quality Public Amenities Economic Benefits Sustainability Coral Mountain checks all the boxes…Coral Mountain checks all the boxes… Questions? To learn more and stay up to date on all aspects of Coral Mountain resort, please visit coralmountainlaquinta.com 121 122 June 7, 2022 62 123 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT Rebuttal Slides CORAL MOUNTAIN Water WATER 3 From WSA: REGARDING EVAPORATION… Commercial 6% Open Space 32% Residential 45%Resort 4% Wave 13% WATER 4 TOTAL PROJECT WATER USE1 1CVWD-approved Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification, April 14, 2020 WATER 5 Source: Wave Basin Site Development Permit submittal to City of La Quinta From WSA: REGARDING EVAPORATION...WSA Assumption of 18.72 Acres Provides a 50% Margin of Safety WATER 6 Source References: 1.Coachella Valley RUWMP-2021 2.CVWD Water Supply Assessment Fact Sheet 3.Indio-SGMA-Alternative Plan-Compiled-FINAL Adopted Dec. 2021 4.Indio-Subbasin Annual Report Workshop-March 22 Final 5.Indio-Subbasin WY-2021 Final Regarding the Drought and CVWD Groundwater Sustainability Planning: (1)Groundwater Storage has increased,even during periods of drought.Since 2009,the amount of water stored in the East Indio Subbasin has increased by approximately 840,000 acre -feet through groundwater management efforts despite extreme drought condition between 2013 and 2016 that led to mandatory water use restrictions and drastic cuts in deliveries of State Water Project water. (2)Additional increases in groundwater storage are forecast.Between 2020 and 2045,the amount of groundwater in the Indio Subbasin is expected to increase further,including Coral Mountain Resort,all other existing users and planned future growth,climate change,and further extreme drought conditions. (3)CVWD’s Recent Plan Update does NOT assume the delivery of increased quantities of Colorado River water.The Plan Update does not assume that more water will be delivered to California in future years,but rather slightly more of the Colorado River water will be allocated to CVWD under existing transfer agreements. (4)The Plan Update takes a “Worst -Case Scenario”approach.The plan update assumes CVWD will be required to forego some of its allocated River water so it will remain in Lake Mead;and assumes that less than half of the State Water Project allocation will be delivered. WATER SUSTAINABILITY 7 8 WATER 10 1CVWD –Water Shortage Contingency Plan, June 2021 •“The project should not be approved.We are going to run out of water.” Response:Inaccurate per CVWD’s updated Groundwater Management Plan: Comment: Coral Mountain’s water use was included in the Groundwater Management Plan. “ CORAL MOUNTAIN Wave Basin Lighting Ambient Light Sources Existing Conditions Ave. 58/Madison Looking South towards 60th Ambient Light Sources 13 Existing Conditions Madison & 58th Ambient Light Sources 14 Existing Conditions Madison & 60th Madison & Andalusia Entry Ambient Light Sources 15 Existing Conditions PGA West 16 Coral Mountain Light Test Sources: Coral Mountain FEIR -Lighting Memo Appendix B.1 and other materials submitted to LQCC 7.20.2021 17 Source: Coral Mountain FEIR –Musco Lighting Technical Memo Appendix B.2 November 17, 2021 18 Light Test Photography Lights On Lights Off The Bottom Line: No light spillage outside of Wave Basin area Coral Mountain Light Test Source: Coral Mountain FEIR –Musco Lighting Technical Memo Appendix B.2 November 17, 2021 Light Test Photography 20 21 22 23 VIEW FROM LION’S GATE Source: Coral Mountain Draft EIR Exhibit 4.1-7 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 KEY FACTS & CONCLUSIONS •Only very limited glimpses of the Wave Basin lighting will be visible from outside the property, in limited locations. •The new perimeter landscape installation,including trees,and new homes will completely obscure views of the lighting. •In the context of the existing light sources surrounding the project site,these very limited potential views of the Wave Basin lighting would not be a significant impact. •It is important to maintain the 80’pole height to optimize the Wave Basin lighting with the minimum number of poles and to avoid any light overspill outside the Basin. •The current design is the least obtrusive overhead lighting system in terms of light cutoffs and glare,and the fixtures are fully rated “Dark Skies Compliant.” CORAL MOUNTAIN Noise Noise Level Studies L1 L2 Source: Coral Mountain Resort DEIR Appendix K.1 Noise Level Studies Source: Coral Mountain Resort DEIR Appendix K.1 Noise Study CORAL MOUNTAIN Traffic Intersection Analysis Source: Coral Mountain Resort DEIR Appendix L.1 Traffic Study •Eight intersections will require new traffic signals with or without the project. •The roundabout at Jefferson and Avenue 52 will require improvements with or without the project. •The project adds the need for a signal at Madison and Avenue 58, which the project is required to install. •The project will fund its fair share of the other traffic improvements through payment of the City’s development impact fees. •No unmitigated impacts to any intersections. Special Events Source: Coral Mountain Resort DEIR Chapter 4.13 Transportation •Special events impact the same intersections. •All potential impacts are mitigated by project and City’s CIP improvements at buildout. •Any special events proposed before project buildout require additional mitigation to ensure no significant impacts. Special Events –Mitigation Measures Source: Coral Mountain Resort DEIR Chapter 4.13 Transportation TRA-9 If Special Events are to take place prior to the completion of Phase 3 construction, Phase 3 typical operations traffic improvements will be completed or the applicant shall provide a focused traffic analysis with the Temporary Use Permit that identifies any improvements that are not necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service at study intersections. If the analysis does not demonstrate acceptable operations, the TUP will be denied. TRA-10 If Special Events are to take place prior to the construction of Phase 3, a special event traffic and parking plan will be submitted with each Temporary Use Permit to ensure that special events will not cause any significant traffic or parking impacts. If the analysis does not demonstrate acceptable operations, the TUP will be denied. Special Events –Mitigation Measures Source: Coral Mountain Resort DEIR Chapter 4.13 Transportation TRA-11 Traffic Management Plans will be submitted to the City and the Police Department for review and approval prior to special events. Timing for installation of traffic management measures will be scaled to the size and duration of the event. In general,signage for large events should be in place five days prior and two days following special events. The City and Police Department may impose additional measures if determined to be necessary. Individual management plans for specific special events shall be submitted at least 30 days prior to the start of the event. The special event Traffic Management Plans shall include the measures identified in Mitigation Measures TRA-12 through TRA-14 below. TRA-12 In developing the Special Event Traffic Management Plan, the project proponent shall include the use of Portable changeable message signs (CMS) or moveable mechanical electronic message boards. CMS will be located at critical locations identified by the La Quinta Police Department (LQPD) and in place 5 days ahead of the event and 2 days after. TRA-13 In developing the Special Event Traffic Management Plan the project proponent shall include the use of law enforcement personnel and/or special event flaggers to direct traffic in locations reviewed and approved by the City and Police Department. TRA-14 In developing the Special Event Traffic Management Plan the project proponent shall include the use of public service announcements (PSA) to provide information to event guests and surrounding neighborhoods prior to the event. Examples include online event information, brochures and changeable message signs that include details such as suggested routes, drop-off and parking facility locations. Special Events –Mitigation Measures Source: Coral Mountain Resort DEIR Chapter 4.13 Transportation 4.13.7 Level of Significance After Mitigation With the implementation of the Mitigation Measures described above, and the imposition of conditions of approval, impacts will be reduced to less than significant levels. Implementation of the project will result in reduced Citywide VMT for service population and will not increase VMT at the regional level. Draft EIR Conclusion -All transportation impacts are fully mitigated: CORAL MOUNTAIN Land Use Coral Mountain Specific Plan 42 PROPOSED ZONING CITY OF LA QUINTA OFFICIAL ZONING MAP 43 Examples of C-T zoned areas in neighborhood context CORAL MOUNTAIN Short-Term Vacation Rentals 45 Source: City of La Quinta –STVR Presentation to City Council by City Staff, 3/1/2022 Attachment 1 to City Council Staff Report 46 Coral Mountain Resort: STVR Complaint Ratios by Area AREA STVR PERMITS AS OF 12/20/2021 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS IN 2021 COMPLAINTS PER PERMIT PARTICIPATION RATE So. La Quinta /PGA West 354 3,040 281 0.79 11.6 The Cove 252 4,711 288 1.14 5.30 STVR Exempt Areas 321 911 52 0.16 35.20 Source: Data compiled from City of La Quinta –STVR Presentation to City Council by City Staff, 3/1/2022 47 Revenue to the City from STVRs Source: City of La Quinta –STVR Presentation to City Council by City Staff, 3/1/2022 48 Decline in Total STVRs in La Quinta Source: City of La Quinta –STVR Presentation to City Council by City Staff, 3/1/2022 49 Key STVR Benefits •Generational and demographic changes in destination resort markets are witnessing ashift away from short-term stays in pure hotel-based hospitality products. •Hotels in the Coachella Valley are among the riskiest forms of real estate investment due to dramatic oscillations in seasonal occupancy and “RevPAR”* making hotels difficult to capitalize. •STVRs allow operators access to a key inventory that is elastic and can be optimizedseasonally,without the burden of carry during low occupancy and revenue periods,thushelpingunderwrite better prospects of success. •STVRs at Coral Mountain are projected to generate more than $1.3 million in TOTrevenuestothe City annually. *Revenue per available room (RevPAR) is a metric used in the hospitality industry to measure hotel performance. The measurement is calculated by multiplying a hotel's average daily room rate (ADR) by its occupancy rate. STVR: Successful Management Strategies •Compliance with City’s Municipal Code.Determining the terms and conditions of allowing short- term vacation rentals before development occurs.The units will be subject to a Development Agreement and City ordinances as stipulated in the Municipal Code. •DRE Registration.Addressing short-term rental in the Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions for the community that are reviewed and approved by the State of California Department of Real Estate and the Citsy of La Quinta. •Sales Disclosures.Providing disclosures that must be agreed to by all homebuyers, acknowledging that the community allows short-term rentals. •Management.Intensive onsite management of the STVR program,streamlining the reservation system,TOT collection,and enforcement of rules. 51 Coral Mountain STVRs: KEY FACTS & CONCLUSIONS •STVR Exempt Zones offer valuable insight and guidance with respect to future STVR programs: STVRs in the Exempt Areas have dramatically fewer complaints than in the PGA West andCoveneighborhoods. STVR participation rates are much higher than other neighborhoods,which means theseunitsprovidefarmoreTOTrevenuetotheCityperparcel. •La Quinta’s existing data on STVRs confirms that they can successfully operate in plannedareaswithexceptionallylowcomplaintrates. •There is no reason to limit the number of STVRs at Coral Mountain CORAL MOUNTAIN Economics Coral Mountain: Cash Flow 53 $3,474,320 $1,593,716 $1,880,605 $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 Annual Revenues Annual Costs Annual Cash Flows NOTES 1 The cost of services "per capita", or per person in the City based on contracts and adopted budgets 2 Revenue from tax sources accruing to the City's General Fund * Source Data Service Costs & GF Revenues -Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis, COLQ City of La Quinta Finance Dept. Local Developments: Cash Flow 54 $3,474,320 $14,500 $10,500 $1,593,716 $1,094,351 $2,630,693 $1,880,605 ($1,079,851) ($2,620,193)($3,000,000) ($2,000,000) ($1,000,000) $0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 Coral Mountain Andalusia Trilogy Annual Revenues Annual Costs Annual Cash Flows NOTES 1 The cost of services "per capita", or per person in the City based on contracts and adopted budgets 2 Revenue from tax sources accruing to the City's General Fund * Source Data Service Costs & GF Revenues - Coral Mountain Resort Cost/Revenue Analysis, COLQ City of La Quinta Finance Dept. CORAL MOUNTAIN Consultation with CA DFW Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains CONSERVATION AREA 56 Source: California Department of Fish and Wildlife CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN – Design Features 57 Expert Biologist’s Conclusion Source: Coral Mountain Resort Final EIR Appendix D.5 CORAL MOUNTAIN Cultural and Historical Resources Cultural and Historical Resources Cultural and Historical Resources 1 1 1 Source: Coral Mountain DEIR Appendix F -Letter from Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians dated June 20, 2020 "At this time the concerns of the ACBCI THPO have been addressed and proper mitigation measures have been proposed to ensure the protection of tribal cultural resources. This letter shall conclude our AB52 consultation efforts." Other Issues Raised During Public Comment •Hazards and Hazardous Conditions •GHG Emissions •Air Quality •Energy Use 62 Conclusion The Bottom Line: •The Final EIR thoroughly vets potential environmental impacts •Coral Mountain is highly differentiated in its approach to creating a unique and special experiential community with market relevance •The community plan and architecture are exciting and engaged •Coral Mountain embraces sustainable principles in energy and water •Coral Mountain contains exciting, publicly-accessible features •The project brings significant economic benefits to the City. 63 Questions? To learn more and stay up to date on all aspects of Coral Mountain resort, please visit coralmountainlaquinta.com CORAL MOUNTAIN Wave Basin VIEW FROM AVENUE 58 WAVE BASIN SURFER DIAGRAM VIEW FROM AVENUE 58 WAVE BASIN SURFER DIAGRAM VIEW FROM AVENUE 58 WAVE BASIN HYDROLOGY Facility VOLUME Flood Storage Wave Basin 18.5 69.6 Outfitters ("The Farm") Lake 3.1 3.8 Estate Lot Lake 4.2 6.7 South Retention Basin 5.7 27.9 Wave Basin volume for daily operating condition = 18MG or 55.2 AF (@325,51 Gal./AF) 50% Source: CVWD Non-potable and Recycled Water Fact Sheet, updated January 2021 50%50% 50%50%34% 16% WATER SUSTAINABILITY 31 50% Source: CVWD 50%50% 50%50%34% 16% WATER SUSTAINABILITY 32 WATER SUSTAINABILITY 34 HAND OUTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT A very unpopular project in the middle of a drought Derek Wong La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Our “Say No to the Wave” Survey Monkey petition signers are all around La Quinta and beyond CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Comments on the Petition were optional, nevertheless, we have provided 100 pages of unsolicited comments to the City Staff with a few samples shown here: CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What restrictions were in the 2015 drought? CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT We did not face the severe Colorado River Crisis impacts in 2015 as we do now •All Colorado River Water Delivered To CVWD is For IRRIGATION AND POTABLE PURPOSES. COLORADO RIVER WATER IS CONSIDERED POTABLE UNDER THE QSA & BOULDER CANYON AGREEMENTS. •The newest Statewide Emergency Guidelines State that the application of potable water cannot be applied to Non-Functional Purposes •Surf Parks and lagoons will probably be included in the next iteration of prohibited purposes CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT We are not alone in challenging Kelly Slater Surf Parks: •WSL / KS Surf Ranch Sunshine Coast Coolum Australia is facing stiff environmental opposition and has been for years. The project is not on the Queensland Government website nor on Consolidated Properties, the developer’s website. •Projects in Palm Beach and Austin also have had no traction. •You can’t apply the Lemoore Surf Ranch Mentality anywhere else as its environmental metrics are obviously not universal throughout the world. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Drone Overview of the Coral Mountain Surf Basin Judy Hovjacky La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Assembly Bill AB 441 –Cleanliness of a Wave Pool 115960.11. (a)The wave basin operator shall maintain clean wave basin water while the wave basin is in use. The wave basin operator shall not allow debris, including, but not limited to, floating scum, sputum, trash, or leaves, to accumulate in the wave basin. The wave basin operator shall ensure that water levels are maintained and operated to remove that material continuously through the wave basin skimming or overflow system. (b)The wave basin operator shall clean the bottom, sides, and other surfaces of the wave basin as often as necessary to keep the bottom, sides, and wave basin surfaces clean and free of slime and algae. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Things to watch for in the Drone Video of the location of the Coral Mountain Surfing Wave Pool •The 80 feet test lights are at the ends of the wave pool •Look at the proximity to Coral Mountain. Roads, sidewalks, wave generating equipment, etc. need to be right along Coral Mountain and will cause light on the Mountain •As you watch the landscape, the water will be up to 400 feet wide all along this path •Look how close to Lisa Castro’s house and yard by the second light •All the roads and sidewalks along this side will be next to Lisa’s property. •There is no way to cross the Wave Basin other than at the ends. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What to think about as you watch •How do you keep a body of water this large clean of wind-swept sand and debris so it is usable? •How do you circulate 18 million gallons of water to keep it sanitized and free of algae and brain-eating bacteria, especially when the water will heat up into the 90s in the desert, and you are expecting to keep people safe to be using this massive body of water? •Contrary to the developer’s information in the EIR, who is basing things on Lemoore and thinks the pool will cool at night when our lows are low 90s or upper 80s for a few hours before sunset. Lemoore lows in the summer are in the upper 60s to low 70s. Their pools cool off every night •The massive amount of evaporation from sun, heat, wind and wave action that will cause the need of constant replenishment from our aquifer •Please email acallimanis@gmail.com if you want to have a copy of this video. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Please play video file DJI-0465.mov CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 1 “Certification of this project CANNOT be recommended to the City Counsel. Benefits of the project do not outweigh the significant and numerous environmental impacts.” Planning Commissioner Currie General Plan Bob Lasser La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 2 Andalusia specific plan amendment- ünot consistent with General plan CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 3 General plan amendment and zone change- ü Not consistent with general plan ü Does not uphold rights and needs of surrounding property owners ü Not consistent with neighboring developments ü Zone change-not compatible with zoning of adjacent properties CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 4 The Coral Mountain proposed plan will create ü Excessive noise, traffic ü Unnecessary wasteful use of water ü Detrimental to public health and general welfare of surrounding communities CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 5 Coral Mountain Specific Plan ü Not compatible with General Plan and land use goals ü Traffic circulation ü Livable community standards ü Economic development benefit ü Not an efficient use of Water and scenic resources CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 6 As a private Resort ü Will not broaden recreational opportunities for current and future residents ü Access to resort amenities is extremely limited CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 7 Tentative Tract Map will likely contribute to ü Excessive water demand ü Increase gas emissions ü Increase noise ü Increase traffic ü Coral mountain benefits will NOT outweigh its numerous impacts CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 8 The Development Agreement is not consistent with General Plan in terms of ü Stated objectives ü Policies ü Land uses and programs CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 9 Coral Mountain is a 23 -year phased project and will result in ü Increased noise ü Greenhouse gas emissions ü Construction traffic and dust for years to come Ultimately can be detrimental to the market value, health, and welfare of the surrounding communities CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 10 Regarding certification of the EIR üEIR fails to assess significant business risk Project could be abandoned CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 11 Significant environmental impacts to surrounding residential areas ü Increased noise on a daily basis ü Excessive traffic figures ü Excessive water requirements ü Just to name a few CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 12 Majority of impacts are inefficient or cannot be completely mitigated ü Allowing certification of the EIR with significant numerous environmental impacts should not be ignored ü Many of the details may be mis- leading CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 13 “Certification of this project CANNOT be recommended to the City Counsel. Benefits of the project do not outweigh the significant and numerous environmental impacts.” Planning Commissioner Michael Proctor, also a five-year veteran on the Planning Commission used the word Specious no less than three times when describing the Coral Mountain Surf Project. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 14 Specious (adjective) Definition: Superficially plausible, but actually wrong. Misleading in appearance, especially misleadingly attractive. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT 15 Commissioner Proctor’s EIR Key Points: •“Quantity Undefined” = they have no idea if it will work or not, and if not, there is no plan •Profuse amount of speculation and pretty drawings •Scientific data countered point by point •Water use is primary concern “how we use water and who uses it matters” •CVWD modeling of water supply is “guessing and specious” •Water supply is finite and must be used responsibly •As presented the Coral Mountain Water Park is totally unacceptable. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Noise on Site at Coral Mountain Never TestedCarolyn WinnorLa Quinta, CA 92253CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Chad Maye’s AB 441 for Recreational water use: wave basins•Specifically introduced for “an artificially constructed body of water within an impervious water containment structure incorporating the use of a mechanical device principally designed to generate waves for surfing on a surfboard or analogous surfing device commonly used in the ocean and intended for sport”.•Passed Assembly, Senate Health, currently on hold by Committee on AppropriationsCITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Relevant Provision on Noise•115960.17.(a) In all cases where wave action is suspended for any reason, an audible signal shall be used prior to resuming wave action to warn patrons of impending waves. That audible signal may be of any duration but shall sound within 15 seconds immediately prior to resuming the breaking wave action. The audible signal shall be loud enough so that it can be heard by anyone in the wave basin water and within the range of motion of the wave generation system, but shall not exceed 90 decibels.CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Initial Sound RecordingCITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Audio Test from Air Horn at Middle of Wave Basin to decibel monitor near Coral MountainLocation of air horn siteIn relation to Coral MountainClick symbol for audio playbackCITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What the EIR says about Noise which was modeled but not physically tested at Coral Mountain•One engineer described Coral Mountain in the EIR as soft so no echoing would occur•Another engineer in the EIR described Coral Mountain hard surfaces like used in modeling a highway for transportation noise that would be reflected at 1 –2 decibels, not perceptible by the human ear•A study was done with Cadna/A software to model sound measurements•This was a software modeling study superimposing sound measurements made at Coral Mountain receptors with sound recorded at Lemoore•No actual sound test was performed at Coral Mountain•We asked multiple times for Coral Mountain on‐site actual noise testingCITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What our Testing showed•There is echoing off Coral Mountain•There needs to be warning signals closer to surfers waiting at either end of the pool for the waves to come so the signals will be loud enough per AB 441 to sufficiently warn surfers•More warning horns will exacerbate the distance sound will carry and will significantly impact not only Coral Mountain, but Lisa Castro and the developments near Coral Mountain•The air horn was clearly heard and recorded at Trilogy homes on 60th•Needless to say, it was loud for Lisa Castro –her sound recordings available upon requestCITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Our test proves the EIR is wrong and did not adequately test real noise impacts so the EIR cannot be certified•The following real testing needs to be completed prior to certifying the EIR and approving the project because these results will prove that the project location is wrong and will significantly impact surrounding neighborhoods:Sound must be tested at Coral Mountain that will reflect not just the sounds of the Wave Basin and the Wave machinery noise, as in the EIR, but also just as significant:Sound and Music speakers AnnouncementsJet skisCheering crowds Screaming participants and beginning surfersWarning horns (once every three or four minutes, 7AM to 10pmCITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Just a quick thing on lighting CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Musco Lighting Demonstration •While Musco Lighting only did two of the 17 Eighty foot lights: •There was very little spillage and glare •However, two lights at the ends do not adequately illustrate the cluster effect •But the demonstration proved what we expected –there will be a total wipeout of views of Coral Mountain CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Observers of the demonstration were shocked and could not believe how much of the light they were seeing CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT The two light demonstration CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT An amusing attempt to try to show what 17 eighty foot lights would look like. Everyone will be seeing this light swath which is 80 feet high. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What is this phenomenon of the light glow? •This was explained on the night of the demonstration by Tim Newendorp, Project Engineer with Musco lighting: •“What you are seeing is the ‘presence’ of light. This is due to the desert particulate (fine sand, etc.) that is in the air that will always reflect the light.” •Water vapor from the wave basin will do that too •Musco light designs only prevent glare and the light spilling over the sides of the wave basin. •Good bye night views of Coral Mountain CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Ask the Desert Sun •Q:What is the haze that can be seen at times covering the valley? —Thomas Stalker •A: "Desert haze" is a combination of dust, smoke, and other dry particulates that create a hazy effect in the sky. Sources for haze particles can include farming, traffic, industry and wildfires, but much of what we see on a daily basis is simply from the dust caused by our sandy environment here in the Colorado Desert. •—Larry Bohannan, golf writer and longtime desert resident CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT But what about light on the Mountain? •With the Wave Basin stretching across this area, there will have to be roads and sidewalks along Lisa Castro’s home and along the west side of the project. •Otherwise you can’t easily get around the pool •And the lights will have to be lit for safety, 24 x 7, since there is a ½ mile long “pool” present where drunk people will think they can go swimming, will dive in, it is shallow and they will break their necks •And the development is being allowed 25 foot and 45 foot high lights for safety •Coral Mountain will forever be lit by these safety lights on all night long •Coral Mountain inhabitants, both seen and unseen, will be affected CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT You are forever impacting residents in the area •With a private resort •In favor of a developer •In favor of out-of-towners •In favor of Transient Occupancy Tax CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT BIG POOL, BIG WAVES, BIG CONCERNS Donna Williams 81920 Eagle Claw Drive La Quinta CA 92253 June 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Why Safety Matters in Surf Parks “Injuries should make Surf Park industry leaders nervous, given the current rapid growth of the industry.” “On any given day, the average surfer in a surf park does get bumped and bounced off the bottom, their board, and sometimes other people.” “For Surf Park Operators, injuries are the number one enemy…..” Excerpts from article in SURF PARK CENTRAL Aug 17, 2021 https://surfparkcentral.com/ CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Excerpts from BeachGrit article by Derek Rielly (10 months ago) https://beachgrit.com/2021/08/hawaiian-surf-champion-suffers-horror-injury-at-kelly-slaters-surf-ranch-ive-been-asked-by- many-whether-getting-injured-is-worth-the-risk-as-a-professional-athlete/ “I’ve seen, close up, two head injuries and a dislocated shoulder, head wounds at Wavegarden, dislocated shoulder at Surf Ranch. An orgy of blood followed by soap and towels.” “All that pretty blue water and troupes of lifeguards ain’t gonna save you if you go over the handlebars in twelve inches of water. Four years ago, I was surprised by the power of the takedown and how long I was held under for at the Lemoore tank.” “The Hawaiian longboarder Sally Cohen……pretty regularly up there at number eight in the world rankings, got belted at Surf Ranch a few days ago, losing four teeth after a date with the vinyl covered concrete bottom.” CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT PROFESSIONAL WORLD SURF LEAGUE LONGBOARDER WHO SUFFERED CATASTROPHIC INJURY WHILE PRACTICING FOR EVENT AT SURF RANCH TURNS TO GOODNESS OF OTHERS TO PAY EXORBITANT MEDICAL BILLS! https://beachgrit.com/2022/02/professional-world-surf-league-longboarder-who-suffered- catastrophic-injury-while-practicing-for-event-at-surf-ranch-turns-to-goodness-of-others-to- pay-exorbitant-medical-bills/ CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Lawsuit Filed Against BSR Surf Resort THE PARENTS OF FABRIZIO STABILE–A NEW JERSEY SURFER WHO PASSED AWAY FROM A BRAIN-EATING AMOEBA AFTER SURFING BSR’S WAVEPOOL LAST YEAR–ARE SUING BSR CABLE PARK FOR DAMAGES APRIL 23, 2019 BY SURFER SOCIAL ICON WEBSITESOCIAL ICON RSSSOCIAL ICON TWITTER CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Emergency Response Excerpts from 08/12/2020 Letter CAL FIRE Riverside County, Riverside to MSA Consulting, Inc. • The proposed project will have a cumulative adverse impact on the Fire Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service.These impacts include an increased number of emergency and public service calls due to the increased presence of structures, traffic and population.The project proponents/developers will be expected to provide for a proportional mitigation to these impacts via development impact fees. • Further review of the project will occur upon receipt of building plans. Additional requirements may be necessary at that time. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT SUMMARY MANY SAFETY CONCERNS •POOL DEPTH? HEAD INJURIES? •BOTTOM SURFACE -- HOW SOFT? HOW HARD? •WILL HELMETS BE REQUIRED? •BLOOD IN THE POOL -- DRAIN? REFILL? CLEAN? •POOL EQUIPMENT? HOW SAFE? •WATER QUALITY? •consistent 100 + degree desert heat and constant sun? •HEAT STROKE? •EMERGENCY RESPONSE – RESOURCE INTENSIVE? CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Tourist Commercial Zone Change Analysis Lori Kilburn La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Let’s examine this statement that justifies the Zoning Change “The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south- central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA.” CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Let’s Start with Centre Pointe •On the corner of Washington and Miles •It is next to Homewood Suites •What was the equivalent “Wave Pool” attraction? •Perhaps the Applebee’s Nearby? •Or Eisenhower Medical Office? •Or they wanted to live nearby a hotel? •Or perhaps they wanted nice housing? CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Equivalent to Coral Mountain Surf Resort? “The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA.”FALSE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Let’s Move to Legacy Villas •At Eisenhower and Coachella Drive •Great STVR Community with nice pools and next door to La Quinta Resort •Easy access to Old Town, X Park, Living Desert Zoo, hiking trails, etc. •What was the equivalent “Wave Pool” attraction? •No equivalent either CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Equivalent to Coral Mountain Surf Resort? “The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA.”FALSE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Let’s Look at Travertine •Not in front of City Council Yet •Southeast of Coral Mountain •Will be developed in the Flood Plain behind the Thomas E Levy CVWD replenishment facility •Will need three bridges over the berm that was built by the Army Corp of Engineers to protect the area from flooding •Bridge From 62nd •Bridge From a new Madison extension •Bridge From 58th and a new Jefferson extension •This project should not get the time of day from anyone FALSE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Now about PGA West •Already existing Golf Course and homes •What was the equivalent “Wave Pool” attraction? •Probably the existing golf course or STVRs •No new attraction had to be built to bring people there FALSE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Silver Rock •From the Silver Rock website: Owned by the City of La Quinta and managed by Landmark Golf Management, SilverRock Resort's Arnold Palmer Classic Course is a challenging 7,239 yards, sprawling over 200 acres with massive native bunkers and stunning water features. Set against the backdrop and natural beauty of the Santa Rosa Mountains, SilverRock is a former home course of the PGA Tour's Bob Hope Classic from 2008-2011. •Golf Course has been there for years and years and the hotels and housing are finally getting built •The Golf Course is the “daytime” feature •Backdrop and natural beauty of the Santa Rosa Mountains are not being compromised day or night by an equivalent Wave Park feature FALSE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Let’s Examine this statement about the Coral Mountain Resort Location •“Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods.” •CVWD has confirmed that due to the Thomas E Levy pipelines, no other location was available on this property CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Where is Cantera –on the south side of 58th bounded on two sides by Coral Mountain Resort –taken from middle of wave pool location. Cantera will not be shielded Cantera 11 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT How about Lisa Castro’s and Guillermo Casillas’ houses –this picture is taken from the zone in the area of the light demonstration right by the wave pool – no shielding here CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT There is nothing true about this statement “Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods.” CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT “The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south- central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA.” There is not a true word in this whole statement which is the basis of your Zoning Change CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT You Cannot Change the Current Zoning from low density residential to Tourist Commercial •There is no basis in fact to change this area to Tourist Commercial •To do so is subscribing to falsehoods and is an abdication of your responsibility to the residents of La Quinta and to the 2035 General Plan CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT More Problems with the EIR Katrina Chevalier CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Significant Issues with IID –Ongoing meetings with Cities on how to deal with IID and electrical issues •How will electricity be provided for Coral Mountain and projects? •That is a significant issue with Coral Mountain Surf Resort because the wave mechanism uses significant amount of energy, the highest of any artificial wave mechanism CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What does the DEIR say about IID and power •In a will serve letter dated May 26, 2020, IID indicated that it can extend electrical facilities to serve the site. Therefore, with the project’s connection to the IID substation, it is anticipated that IID’s existing and planned electricity capacity and electricity supplies would be sufficient to support the project’s demand. IID has indicatednthat additional offsite improvements will be required to meet the project’s power demand. The project will be required to install twelve, 6-inch conduits along Avenue 58 to bring additional power to the siteand install a transformer bank at IID’s existing substation yard located at Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. •The offsite improvements for the conduit system will take place in the existing right of way, on both sides of Avenue 58, between Andalusia and PGA West, and on Madison Street, west of Andalusia. Avenue 58 is an improved road and classified as a secondary arterial. These improvements would occur along the existing right-of-way and will be installed underground during Phase I of the development. The purpose of the extension is to provide electricity to the project only. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT This referenced Will Serve Letter was expired at the time of the DEIR so the DEIR contained invalid and misleading information •We were told by Ms.Criste that the DEIR did not need to include a Will Serve letter so it is not an issue •But reviewers all were mistaken that the power requirements would be met CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT The Final EIR references the same IID Will Serve letter which says IID can provide electricity to the Coral Mountain Surf Resort •The project will be required to make offsite improvements for electrical power to the site. The project will be required to install an off-site transformer bank at an existing IID substation located at 81600 Avenue 58 and extend a distribution line along Avenue 58. Conduit systems will also be installed along Avenue 58 as part of the proposed upgrades. Construction of the conduits and line extension would occur in the existing right-of-way. The extension of IID’s infrastructure will provide electricity exclusivity to the proposed project. The project’s connection to the existing IID infrastructure will occur during the first phase of development and will be for exclusive use of the proposed project. In a letter dated May 26, 2020, IID concluded that electrical facilities can be extended to serve the project, under the conditions in the will serve letter. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT The Referenced Will Serve letter is again the expired May 26, 2020 letter •Mr. Gamlin indicated that a new Will Serve letter was issued in the fall of 2021 and that it did not need to be referenced in an EIR •However, in the Final EIR issued in February 2022, the same expired Will Serve letter is referenced •Why was the new Will Serve letter not referenced? •In a public records request, the City stated it did not have a copy of the new Will Serve letter •How can we believe in the integrity of the EIR if we know there is erroneous information in it? CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT You Cannot Certify the EIR for Coral Mountain •The integrity of the EIR is called into question •We have documented for you numerous discrepancies •How many more are there? CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Evaporation Mr. Robin Probst La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What are the assumptions for Wave Pools •Currently, CVWD Landscape Ordinance defines a “Water Feature” as any water applied to the landscape for non-irrigation, decorative purposes, including fountains, streams, ponds and lakes. The Wave Basin is considered a water feature under CVWD Landscape Ordinance No. 1302.4. •Water features use more water than efficiently irrigated turf grass and are assigned an evapotranspiration adjustment factor of 1.1 for a stationary body of water and 1.2 for a moving body of water for this reason. •The proposed Wave Basin is essentially a lake with moving water and is why the factor of 1.2 is used to estimate evaporation at Coral Mountain Surf Resort in La Quinta. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Hydrologist defined area to calculate •A six foot wave that will be traveling for almost a half mile has more surface area than just the base area of the pool. •For example, if the Wave Basin water surface is 12.5 acres, the actually square footage surface area to be calculated for evaporation is significantly higher and must account for the total 6 foot wave surface. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Other evaporation considerations •If the wave itself does wash over areas, those areas must be considered for evaporation as well. •Our significant wind events must be used in any calculations for evaporation as water will be absorbed into the air at a much higher rate since the air is moving and won’t become saturated. •Pan evaporation numbers that were used as part of the calculations for evaporation by CVWD have not been updated since 2005. That year the Indio area had only 99 days over 100. In 2020, for example, we had over 140 days over 100 and significantly higher temperatures. This would cause significantly more evaporation. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT WADI adventure Surf Park located in a desert •WADI Adventures in the United Arab Emirates is the only other Wave Pool in a desert environment. They had to pipe desalinated water from the coast for 140 miles so they knew exactly how much water was added to the pool. •Their pool was only 2.8 Million gallons and 3 acres. From May to November they added 40,000 gallons and from December to April they added 10,000 gallons. •PLEASE NOTE: They cooled their pool to 84 degrees for the protection of their surfers from the potential of heat stroke and from deadly protozoa. So cooler water evaporates less than the Coral Mountain Wave Basin water which will be in the 90’s in the summer CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Replenishment at WADI due to evaporation •Summer replenishment was 1.5% a day which equates to 270,000 gallons for our Coral Mountain 18 million gallon pool, if our pool was only at 84 degrees. •That is 38 Million gallons for only 140 days, vs. the CVWD calculated 24 Million gallons for a whole year. And this is not including the wind events and higher water temperatures. •And is only 140 days, not a full year. It also does not include the extra surface area of the wave that is exposed to evaporation. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Evaporation in Lemoore •For your information, the Kelly Slater Wave Pool in Lemoore, California, the equivalent pool, size and technology of the Coral Mountain Wave Basin, has said that they lose 250,000 gallons of water on hot days in 2020. •That year they only had 40 days over 100 degrees, with the hottest day 107 degrees. La Quinta had 140 days over 100 degrees with the high temperature of 124 degrees. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT EPA formula Calculation vs. Actual Golf Usage •We did calculations using an EPA formula that takes wind and high temperatures into effect. We only used monthly averages and that came to 740 acre feet or 260 million gallons of evaporation a year versus the 24 million calculated by CVWD •A water bill for a local 18 hole golf course was 165 Million gallons of water consumption in a year. This is lot less than the surf pool. •The golf course was down 15% year over year in the summer, and overall down year over year. Golf courses can conserve. Surf pools cannot conserve. 15% less water means a surf pool cannot operate. They must close. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Wave Pool Evaporation will be significant higher than calculated by CVWD •A Surfing Wave is not a moving lake •CVWD did not bother to explore more accurate means of calculations to address the Wave Pool •You cannot approve the Coral Mountain Surf Pool because it will significantly exceed your MAWA in the middle of a historic drought project CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Good afternoon Mayor Evans, Council Members and panel. I am Carol Strop, a CPA, and I love living in La Quinta. You have in front of you a copy of the cover of the 40th anniversary issue of the Gem and on the flip side is the ad you ran in celebration. The cover has photos of 40 years of people having fun in a myriad of ways. But what else beside the magnificent mountains, blue skies and starry nights have made La Quinta special? It’s because of the foresight, guidance and planning of city government, from our four and six lane wide streets that never seem to be littered, to our new bike lanes, to the manicured landscapes along the roads, to all the new outdoor patios, to the composting program already in place, to the dog friendliness of the city, and to the parks. Right outside the door, how lucky we are to have such a gorgeous place, with its magical fountain and pathways to meander in the shade, with a bridge to stand on and to marvel at the antics of the ducks. A place to honor our Veterans. No wonder La Quinta is truly the Gem of the Desert. Of course, I am standing here to talk about the Coral Mountain Development. But what could I possibly say that’s new? I could quote the surfer who described the Wave as “Super noisy just like a freight train barreling along the track”. I could tell you about my futile search to find a video of the sound of the Wave in Lemoore without music overlaid. I could tell you that the hottest month in Lemoore is July – a mere 96 degrees. But you already know all that. It takes 5 and one half hours to drive to Lemoore. I have not heard that anyone went there. So go, hear the Wave first hand, and see how popular it is. Interview the nearby cattle in the wide open farmlands to see what they think. Bring back a video to the next Council meeting. That is called due diligence. Until then it is too soon to vote. Is the Wave at Coral Mountain in harmony with the surrounding communities? Of course not, we are not farmlands. But you know that too. Approving the Wave with its noise, music, and lights would be a slap in the face. You have heard the residents’ overwhelming concerns and well researched opposition to Coral Mountain rezoning for two years now, on, oh so many, issues. And why is that? It’s because we have much more at stake than just money, and so do you. We are not going to stop fighting. And that is not good for anyone. Now, look at your beautiful ad. It begins with a quote from Alphonse de Lamartine, a poet and politician. “History teaches everything, even the Future” and thanks the residents for the City’s success. And I say thank you. Please, just keep doing what the city councils have done for 40 years, treasure our City. Right now you have the opportunity to write your own history and La Quinta’s future. Forget what you may have already decided, or committed to. Will you be remembered as the City Council who valued its coffers over its constituents and led the City into prolonged legal battles? Or instead will you be highly praised for “proudly walking the path” that continues to enhance La Quinta’s quality of life, for its residents. I think it is an easy choice. Thanks for listening CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Philip Novak, Professor Emeritus La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT As we know: •Greenhouse gas emissions, 80% of which are CO2,act like a blanket, making the earth warmer, exacerbating climate change and its negative effects. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT The Wavepark’s Carbon Footprint •Powered by CO2 -emitting fossil fuels, the Wave Machine’s large underwater blade, must push 18 million gallons of water, a distance of more than 3 football fields, 50 times per day, virtually 365 days per year. •The Wave Basin’s construction will require 16.7 acres (13 football fields) of cement. 6% of global GGH emissions come from the creation and processing of cement. •Year -round vacation commuting to the Wavepark’s STVRs and Hotel will only enlarge the Project’s carbon footprint. •The Developer’s touting of the Project’s walkability as a Carbon Footprint reducer is, proportionally speaking, ridiculous. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Wavepark Environmental Impact, even acc to the DEIR •The DEIR (4.7—19-20) states that the Project will generate GHG emissions totaling 6.46 metric tons of CO2e per service population per year. This 77% more than the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s applicable significance threshold of 3.65 metric tons. •The DEIR notes that this situation cannot be offset via carbon credits because 1) the Coachella Valley has not broadly adopted carbon credits as acceptable mitigations for residential and resort projects; and 2) the City cannot determine with certainty that GGH emissions will thereby be reduced to a less than significant level. •The DEIR concludes: the Project’s GHG impacts should be considered significant and unavoidable. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT GHG Emissions are just one more reason this Wavepark is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong time. City Council Members: Please don’t use the “Statement of Overriding Considerations” to ignore this Project’s admittedly significant and ‘forever’ Greenhous Gas Emissions. If you approve the Wavepark , What lesson are you teaching the students and future leaders of our community??? CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT City of La Quinta Council Members and Staff – We are in an unprecedented water insecurity time Alena Callimanis 81469 Rustic Canyon Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253 919 606-6164 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT From CVWD on May 17 Colorado River background 3 General !serves 40 M people !in drought since early 2000s System stats !"delivery obligation #16.5 maf !storage conditions #2000 -57 maf (95%) #2022 –20 maf (34%) 2022 -23 $200 M for system conservation projects 2019 (Drought Contingency Plan) Management actions 2003 (QSA) 2007 (Interim Guidelines) 2021 (500+plan) Dec 31, 2025 2007 Interim Guidelines expire 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT California Leaders Response to this Unprecedented Megadrought Disaster in the Making •“We are in a drought unlike one we’ve seen before, and we have to take actions that we haven’t taken before,”Felicia Marcus, chairwoman of the State Water Resources Board. •“The severity of this drought requires all Californians to save water in every possible way,” said Joaquin Esquivel, chair of the State Water Resources Control Board,in announcing the new regulations. •The drought has exceeded the severity of a late-1500s megadrought that had been identified as the worst such drought in the 1,200 years the scientists studied. 3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT From the Governor •As California stretches into its third year of drought,Gov. Gavin Newsom is warning local officials that more needs to be done to save water, and to make sure all residents realize how urgent the crisis is. •If not, Newsom said,Californians could face mandatory statewide water restrictions this summer 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT More Reactions to Required Cuts •"Metropolitan has never before employed this type of restriction on outdoor water use. But we are facing unprecedented reductions in our Northern California supplies, and we have to respond with unprecedented measures,"Adel Hagekhalil, the district's general manager, said in a statement. •“We don’t have enough water supplies right now to meet normal demand. The water is not there,”Metropolitan Water District spokesperson Rebecca Kimitch said.“This is unprecedented territory. We've never done anything like this before." 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What is being said about Golf Courses? •“Any part of the golf course that is being used for the game of golf, such as the greens and the fairways, are functional,” said Edward Ortiz, a spokesperson for the State Water Board. •“However, water agencies and golf courses need to evaluate whether other turf on a golf course property is functional or not.” 6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Do not be misled that CVWD is exempt from any and all emergency regulations •As of two days ago, San Diego officials point out that San Diegans are currently using little, if any, water from the state’s imperiled Sacramento River Delta, which feeds urban and agricultural communities through the 705-mile State Water Project. Rather,the region imports more than half of its water from the Colorado River so San Diego claims they should be fine •However, California’s top water officials aren’t buying that logic. On Friday, they said the San Diego region needs to continue to cut back, especially since the Colorado River remains in the grip of a 22-year megadrought. 7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT State’s Largest Water Agency Metropolitan Water Authority takes impactful action •The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California uses water from the Colorado River and the State Water Project to supply 26 public water agencies (Los Angeles, San Bernadino, etc.) that provide water to 19 million people, or 40% of the state's population. •The Metropolitan Water District declared a water shortage emergency in April and voted unanimously to curtail water use,either by restricting outdoor watering or by other means. 8 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Drought and Cuts by the Numbers •As CalMatters’ tracker shows, California has been in a drought for 843 days •In March, the State Water Project, which supplies water to about two-thirds of the state population,cut its 2022 deliveries by 95%. •A month later, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the State’s largest supplier of drinking water, called for a 35% cut to water consumption 9 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT No one, not CVWD, not anyone, can say “We’re Good” anymore •“You look at the Colorado River, you look at these stressed systems,and it’s hard for anyone in the state to justify and say, ‘We’re good,”said Joaquin Esquivel, chair of the State Water Resources Control Board, during a recent hearing to approve the state’s new drought restrictions. •THE FACT THAT CVWD GETS IT WATER FROM THE COLORADO RIVER DOES NOT EXEMPT IT FROM THE SAME SEVERE WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES CURRENTLY BEING IMPOSED ON THE ENTIRE STATE 10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Mr. Gamlin, President Coral Mountain Wave Development, with his Response to the Desert Sun April 17 Editorial •“The editorial incorrectly states that wave basins must use “potable” water, meaning drinking water. To the contrary, non-potable water sources are appropriate with filtration and disinfection such that it meets all applicable regulatory requirements safe for recreational contact.” •This project does use the same potable water sources that CVWD, MWD and San Diego use, the Colorado River water. Whether it comes from the Canal or the aquifer, it needs to be treated for drinking. Gamlin’s statement in not only misleading, it truly is a lie. This project will not use non-potable and it only will use potable water. •Canal water is POTABLE Water. Coral Mountain will use Canal water which is Potable water. 11 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Mr. Gamlin discusses the “Sustainability” of a Wave Park •Mr. Gamlin’s False Alternative of replacing golf with a sustainable surf park is a “Straw Man” argument •The Water does not exist for either and the framing of this argument is to deliberately mislead the public into thinking if the City Council does not approve the Surf Park they must approve the 18 hole golf course •CVWD water usage is predicated on the fact that under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, where all outflows must be matched by equal or greater inflows 12 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT We are Being Misled when Discussing Sustainability •Mr. Gamlin talked about CVWD using the worse case scenario of only receiving 45% of the State Water Project based on 2019 numbers •That ship has long sailed. For the last three allocations, the State Water Project has only supplied either ZERO % or 5 % of the CVWD State Water Project Allocation •So instead of getting 50,000 acre feet of SWP allocation, we are getting 0 to 6500 acre feet, a loss between 50,000 acre feet to 43,500 acre feet per year. •So we are already at a deficit of our aquifer, with more outflow than inflow 13 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Significant Issues with the CVWD Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan •In December 2021, CVWD approved the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update, which provides the most current assessment of the subbasin and other water supplies, including consideration of the potential for extended extreme drought conditions •In that plan, CVWD used the 45% SWP allocation, KNOWING FULL WELL THE ALLOCATIONS HAD BEEN 5% or 0% over the prior two years, no longer 50,000 acre feet •Also under this plan, CVWD noted they would be obligated to contribute approximately 14,000 to 24,500 AFY of their allocation back to the Colorado River Reservoirs •However, not only did their modeling not include the revised SWP allocations, but it did not include the potential for the Colorado River allocation return 14 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Where we stand •We are entering the third year of the drought •All sources for water in the Coachella Valley are at record lows and will continue their decline •The only source of water in the Valley is the Colorado River •Canal Water is Colorado River Water which is the only type of water delivered to the Valley through the Canal 15 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT There is no end in site to this drought •This is an unprecedented time •You cannot just ignore what is going on right now •“As this drought persists into a third year,we are experiencing drier and hotter weather than ever before,”said California Natural Resources Agency Secretary Wade Crowfoot. “These conditions diminish our water supplies but also threaten energy reliability.We are adapting to these unprecedented conditions and working to find flexibilities where possible to safeguard both water supplies and grid reliability.” 16 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT This is not 2019 –This is now •IT'S REAL AND ITS GETTING MUCH WORSE.THESE CATASTROPHIC AND CURRENT MEGA-DROUGHT CONDITIONS WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE WATER STUDIES THE SUPPORTED THE CORAL-MOUNTAIN EIR. •TO DISREGARD OUR CURRENT AND FORESEEABLE FUTURE CATASTROPHIC MEGA-DROUGHT AND RELY UPON OUTDATED EIR DOCUMENTS AS A FORMALITY RATHER THAN REALITY IS TO COMPLETELY ABDICATE YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE PUBLIC THAT YOU ARE ELECTED TO REPRESENT. •AS BAD OR WORSE IS THE DIVISIVE DISTRUST OF YOUR LEADERSHIP IN GOING AHEAD WITH A PROJECT THAT DOES NOT REPRESENT YOUR RESIDENTS BUT ONLY A SMALL HANDFUL OF ELITIST MILLIONAIRES THAT CAN AFFORD TO "SURF" IN THE DESERT FOR $1,000'S OF DOLLARS AND RENT OUT PARTY HOUSES FOR $1,000'S . 17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Here is the City Response to this “Short Term Crisis” which is Short-Sighted “The Water Supply Assessment (WSA) prepared by the applicant considered detailed water demand calculations, which were analyzed in 2019 and reviewed and approved by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD).The analysis in the WSA is based on the requirements of State Water Code, and although it does consider long range planning conducted by CVWD for water supplies, including periods of drought and climate change,it does not address short term crises such as the current drought emergency, nor is it intended to.” •Why would a project like this even be considered during times of climate change?Why do they call this a “short term crisis” -do they have a crystal ball ? •This state of drought is unprecedented and scientists do not know how and when this will end. 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT La Quinta development is growing and visitors are coming •Visitors and new residents are flocking to La Quinta.Property values and visitation are at or very near all time highs.All of this new economic activity is happening without NEW SURF-PARKS, LAGOONS AND GOLF COURSES. •Monday June 6, 2022 Desert Sun: Home Prices up 20% April 2021 to April 2022 19 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT What will an approved surf park bring? •Instead of being a draw to La Quinta it will bring shame and derision AS an area of TONE-DEAF ELITISTS wasting our Precious and dwindling water on ELITE FRIVOLITIES BENEFITTING NO ONE BUT THE GET RICH QUICK DEVELOPERS and out of town SHORT TERM LANDLORDS TRYING TO GET RICH WASTING THE PEOPLE'S WATER. •Employment at the "Surf-Park" will, of course, be the lowest wage seasonal employment possible.This type of low wage employment certainly does not provide the long-term economic opportunities LaQuinta wants for its residents and the residents of surrounding areas. •In Fact, this Elitist SURF-Park provides a RANK example of exploitation of the disadvantaged La Quinta Residents and surrounding communities.20 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Only one decision can be made •We are being gamed by Mr. Gamlin and the developers. This project is NOT for the residents or for the valley •In this unprecedented time, the only decision that can be made is No to the Coral Mountain Surf Resort 21 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT The statement of overriding considerations lacks credibility Rick Roth La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Purported Justification Reason #1 •The project will generate substantial transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenue for the City from the proposed hotel, which the City Council considers a critical component of the project •“Mr. Gamlin has said that the hotel may not be built out. The STVRs are needed to ensure occupancy even during off season.” (Wave Pool is not a year-round amenity like we have said). CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Purported Justification # 2: •The project provides a unique opportunity to allow short-term vacation rentals (STVRs), at the homeowners’ option, that will also generate substantial TOT revenues for the City CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Initial Housing Buildout •104 units would be valued at $2.75 million, and 26 at $6 million. This represents the resort residential portion of the project located adjacent to the hotel and wave pool, as well as the 26 custom home sites located at the northwest corner of the resort complex. •The balance of the residential development, 470 units, average selling price of $2.3M would be built in Phase 3 of the project, and upon completion, would represent build out of the proposed project. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT The most recent development agreement makes TOT impossible to predict CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Certain Revenue the City will get from existing Developments in 2033 Looking at existing built houses as of today at PGA West Greg Norman, The Palms and Plaza Serena, Andalusia, Griffin Ranch, Trilogy, Santa Rosa Trail, Lion’s Gate, Santerra and Alta Verde. Today’s total assessed value = $2,155,196,284 Riverside Tax Rate approximately = 1.28614 So that comes to $27,719,057 in tax money that goes to Riverside. La Quinta gets 6.5 cents on the dollar from Riverside So that makes it $1.8M to La Quinta This does not count any new developments or new housing in the developments above NOT DEPENDENT ON AN UNDEFINED CORAL MOUNTAIN BUILDOUT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT There is no deficit that requires new revenues for fire protection CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT A surf resort will create a deficit •As you saw earlier, Emergency Services are expected to be higher for Coral Mountain Surf Resort •The obvious low-risk alternative is a residence -only buildout at Coral Mountain that avoids this deficit CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT STVR Revenue is still healthy in La Quinta •You do not know if the STVR moratorium will pass •A little over 10% registered voters have put the moratorium on the ballot in November •The initiative shows that voters wanted to restrict STVRs into the currently zoned tourist commercial areas •Why create a new Tourist Commercial Zone in face of that opposition CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT The Real Estate Market is Hot •The primary or secondary home market is hot •The Pandemic has proved you can work from anywhere •This location without the wave resort is ideal for that family or couple •The views are the outstanding and the quiet at night is unmatched anywhere in La Quinta •Black skies here are the envy of the Rancho Mirage Observatory •Add more hiking, walking and biking trails to make this an ideal location CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Use creativity like Toll Brothers on 58th does to collect $613/year assessment for La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT Conclusions •The high risk for this project creates foreseeable risk of business failure and bankruptcy •After bankruptcy, any promises made by the developer won’t be worth the paper it is written on •The only prudent development is residential only •From my point of view, proceeding with the proposed development under these circumstances would be a breach of fiduciary duty CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 7, 2022 - HAND-OUT BY LQRRD - ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - THE WAVE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN PROJECT PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 7, 2022 Verbal Presentations PUBLIC HEARING 1 Coral Mountain Resort Project SHOW US YOUR STRIPES!Developed by Professor Ed Hawkins, University of Reading, 2018. Data updated through 2021. Temperature Change in Riverside County 1895‐20211910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010 A very unpopular project in the middle of a drought Derek Wong La Quinta Our “Say No to the Wave” Survey Monkey petition signers are all around La Quinta and beyond Comments on the Petition were optional, nevertheless, we have provided 100 pages of unsolicited comments to the City Staff with a few samples shown here: What restrictions were in the 2015 drought? We did not face the severe Colorado River Crisis impacts in 2015 as we do now •All Colorado River Water Delivered To CVWD is For IRRIGATION AND POTABLE PURPOSES. COLORADO RIVER WATER IS CONSIDERED POTABLE UNDER THE QSA & BOULDER CANYON AGREEMENTS. •The newest Statewide Emergency Guidelines State that the application of potable water cannot be applied to Non-Functional Purposes •Surf Parks and lagoons will probably be included in the next iteration of prohibited purposes We are not alone in challenging Kelly Slater Surf Parks: •WSL / KS Surf Ranch Sunshine Coast Coolum Australia is facing stiff environmental opposition and has been for years. The project is not on the Queensland Government website nor on Consolidated Properties, the developer’s website. •Projects in Palm Beach and Austin also have had no traction. •You can’t apply the Lemoore Surf Ranch Mentality anywhere else as its environmental metrics are obviously not universal throughout the world. Drone Overview of the Coral Mountain Surf Basin Judy Hovjacky La Quinta Assembly Bill AB 441 –Cleanliness of a Wave Pool 115960.11. (a)The wave basin operator shall maintain clean wave basin water while the wave basin is in use. The wave basin operator shall not allow debris, including, but not limited to, floating scum, sputum, trash, or leaves, to accumulate in the wave basin. The wave basin operator shall ensure that water levels are maintained and operated to remove that material continuously through the wave basin skimming or overflow system. (b)The wave basin operator shall clean the bottom, sides, and other surfaces of the wave basin as often as necessary to keep the bottom, sides, and wave basin surfaces clean and free of slime and algae. Things to watch for in the Drone Video of the location of the Coral Mountain Surfing Wave Pool •The 80 feet test lights are at the ends of the wave pool •Look at the proximity to Coral Mountain. Roads, sidewalks, wave generating equipment, etc. need to be right along Coral Mountain and will cause light on the Mountain •As you watch the landscape, the water will be up to 400 feet wide all along this path •Look how close to Lisa Castro’s house and yard by the second light •All the roads and sidewalks along this side will be next to Lisa’s property. •There is no way to cross the Wave Basin other than at the ends. What to think about as you watch •How do you keep a body of water this large clean of wind-swept sand and debris so it is usable? •How do you circulate 18 million gallons of water to keep it sanitized and free of algae and brain-eating bacteria, especially when the water will heat up into the 90s in the desert, and you are expecting to keep people safe to be using this massive body of water? •Contrary to the developer’s information in the EIR, who is basing things on Lemoore and thinks the pool will cool at night when our lows are low 90s or upper 80s for a few hours before sunset. Lemoore lows in the summer are in the upper 60s to low 70s. Their pools cool off every night •The massive amount of evaporation from sun, heat, wind and wave action that will cause the need of constant replenishment from our aquifer •Please email acallimanis@gmail.com if you want to have a copy of this video. Please play video file DJI-0465.mov 1 “Certification of this project CANNOT be recommended to the City Counsel. Benefits of the project do not outweigh the significant and numerous environmental impacts.” Planning Commissioner Currie General Plan Bob Lasser La Quinta 2 Andalusia specific plan amendment- ünot consistent with General plan 3 General plan amendment and zone change- ü Not consistent with general plan ü Does not uphold rights and needs of surrounding property owners ü Not consistent with neighboring developments ü Zone change-not compatible with zoning of adjacent properties 4 The Coral Mountain proposed plan will create ü Excessive noise, traffic ü Unnecessary wasteful use of water ü Detrimental to public health and general welfare of surrounding communities 5 Coral Mountain Specific Plan ü Not compatible with General Plan and land use goals ü Traffic circulation ü Livable community standards ü Economic development benefit ü Not an efficient use of Water and scenic resources 6 As a private Resort ü Will not broaden recreational opportunities for current and future residents ü Access to resort amenities is extremely limited 7 Tentative Tract Map will likely contribute to ü Excessive water demand ü Increase gas emissions ü Increase noise ü Increase traffic ü Coral mountain benefits will NOT outweigh its numerous impacts 8 The Development Agreement is not consistent with General Plan in terms of ü Stated objectives ü Policies ü Land uses and programs 9 Coral Mountain is a 23 -year phased project and will result in ü Increased noise ü Greenhouse gas emissions ü Construction traffic and dust for years to come Ultimately can be detrimental to the market value, health, and welfare of the surrounding communities 10 Regarding certification of the EIR üEIR fails to assess significant business risk Project could be abandoned 11 Significant environmental impacts to surrounding residential areas ü Increased noise on a daily basis ü Excessive traffic figures ü Excessive water requirements ü Just to name a few 12 Majority of impacts are inefficient or cannot be completely mitigated ü Allowing certification of the EIR with significant numerous environmental impacts should not be ignored ü Many of the details may be mis- leading 13 “Certification of this project CANNOT be recommended to the City Counsel. Benefits of the project do not outweigh the significant and numerous environmental impacts.” Planning Commissioner Michael Proctor, also a five-year veteran on the Planning Commission used the word Specious no less than three times when describing the Coral Mountain Surf Project. 14 Specious (adjective) Definition: Superficially plausible, but actually wrong. Misleading in appearance, especially misleadingly attractive. 15 Commissioner Proctor’s EIR Key Points: •“Quantity Undefined” = they have no idea if it will work or not, and if not, there is no plan •Profuse amount of speculation and pretty drawings •Scientific data countered point by point •Water use is primary concern “how we use water and who uses it matters” •CVWD modeling of water supply is “guessing and specious” •Water supply is finite and must be used responsibly •As presented the Coral Mountain Water Park is totally unacceptable. Noise on Site at Coral Mountain Never TestedCarolyn WinnorLa Quinta, CA 92253 Chad Maye’s AB 441 for Recreational water use: wave basins•Specifically introduced for “an artificially constructed body of water within an impervious water containment structure incorporating the use of a mechanical device principally designed to generate waves for surfing on a surfboard or analogous surfing device commonly used in the ocean and intended for sport”.•Passed Assembly, Senate Health, currently on hold by Committee on Appropriations Relevant Provision on Noise•115960.17.(a) In all cases where wave action is suspended for any reason, an audible signal shall be used prior to resuming wave action to warn patrons of impending waves. That audible signal may be of any duration but shall sound within 15 seconds immediately prior to resuming the breaking wave action. The audible signal shall be loud enough so that it can be heard by anyone in the wave basin water and within the range of motion of the wave generation system, but shall not exceed 90 decibels. Initial Sound Recording Audio Test from Air Horn at Middle of Wave Basin to decibel monitor near Coral MountainLocation of air horn siteIn relation to Coral MountainClick symbol for audio playback What the EIR says about Noise which was modeled but not physically tested at Coral Mountain•One engineer described Coral Mountain in the EIR as soft so no echoing would occur•Another engineer in the EIR described Coral Mountain hard surfaces like used in modeling a highway for transportation noise that would be reflected at 1 –2 decibels, not perceptible by the human ear•A study was done with Cadna/A software to model sound measurements•This was a software modeling study superimposing sound measurements made at Coral Mountain receptors with sound recorded at Lemoore•No actual sound test was performed at Coral Mountain•We asked multiple times for Coral Mountain on‐site actual noise testing What our Testing showed•There is echoing off Coral Mountain•There needs to be warning signals closer to surfers waiting at either end of the pool for the waves to come so the signals will be loud enough per AB 441 to sufficiently warn surfers•More warning horns will exacerbate the distance sound will carry and will significantly impact not only Coral Mountain, but Lisa Castro and the developments near Coral Mountain•The air horn was clearly heard and recorded at Trilogy homes on 60th•Needless to say, it was loud for Lisa Castro –her sound recordings available upon request Our test proves the EIR is wrong and did not adequately test real noise impacts so the EIR cannot be certified•The following real testing needs to be completed prior to certifying the EIR and approving the project because these results will prove that the project location is wrong and will significantly impact surrounding neighborhoods:Sound must be tested at Coral Mountain that will reflect not just the sounds of the Wave Basin and the Wave machinery noise, as in the EIR, but also just as significant:Sound and Music speakers AnnouncementsJet skisCheering crowds Screaming participants and beginning surfersWarning horns (once every three or four minutes, 7AM to 10pm Just a quick thing on lighting Musco Lighting Demonstration •While Musco Lighting only did two of the 17 Eighty foot lights: •There was very little spillage and glare •However, two lights at the ends do not adequately illustrate the cluster effect •But the demonstration proved what we expected –there will be a total wipeout of views of Coral Mountain Observers of the demonstration were shocked and could not believe how much of the light they were seeing The two light demonstration An amusing attempt to try to show what 17 eighty foot lights would look like. Everyone will be seeing this light swath which is 80 feet high. What is this phenomenon of the light glow? •This was explained on the night of the demonstration by Tim Newendorp, Project Engineer with Musco lighting: •“What you are seeing is the ‘presence’ of light. This is due to the desert particulate (fine sand, etc.) that is in the air that will always reflect the light.” •Water vapor from the wave basin will do that too •Musco light designs only prevent glare and the light spilling over the sides of the wave basin. •Good bye night views of Coral Mountain Ask the Desert Sun •Q:What is the haze that can be seen at times covering the valley? —Thomas Stalker •A: "Desert haze" is a combination of dust, smoke, and other dry particulates that create a hazy effect in the sky. Sources for haze particles can include farming, traffic, industry and wildfires, but much of what we see on a daily basis is simply from the dust caused by our sandy environment here in the Colorado Desert. •—Larry Bohannan, golf writer and longtime desert resident But what about light on the Mountain? •With the Wave Basin stretching across this area, there will have to be roads and sidewalks along Lisa Castro’s home and along the west side of the project. •Otherwise you can’t easily get around the pool •And the lights will have to be lit for safety, 24 x 7, since there is a ½ mile long “pool” present where drunk people will think they can go swimming, will dive in, it is shallow and they will break their necks •And the development is being allowed 25 foot and 45 foot high lights for safety •Coral Mountain will forever be lit by these safety lights on all night long •Coral Mountain inhabitants, both seen and unseen, will be affected You are forever impacting residents in the area •With a private resort •In favor of a developer •In favor of out-of-towners •In favor of Transient Occupancy Tax BIG POOL, BIG WAVES, BIG CONCERNS Donna Williams 81920 Eagle Claw Drive La Quinta CA 92253 June 7, 2022 Why Safety Matters in Surf Parks “Injuries should make Surf Park industry leaders nervous, given the current rapid growth of the industry.” “On any given day, the average surfer in a surf park does get bumped and bounced off the bottom, their board, and sometimes other people.” “For Surf Park Operators, injuries are the number one enemy…..” Excerpts from article in SURF PARK CENTRAL Aug 17, 2021 https://surfparkcentral.com/ Excerpts from BeachGrit article by Derek Rielly (10 months ago) https://beachgrit.com/2021/08/hawaiian-surf-champion-suffers-horror-injury-at-kelly-slaters-surf-ranch-ive-been-asked-by- many-whether-getting-injured-is-worth-the-risk-as-a-professional-athlete/ “I’ve seen, close up, two head injuries and a dislocated shoulder, head wounds at Wavegarden, dislocated shoulder at Surf Ranch. An orgy of blood followed by soap and towels.” “All that pretty blue water and troupes of lifeguards ain’t gonna save you if you go over the handlebars in twelve inches of water. Four years ago, I was surprised by the power of the takedown and how long I was held under for at the Lemoore tank.” “The Hawaiian longboarder Sally Cohen……pretty regularly up there at number eight in the world rankings, got belted at Surf Ranch a few days ago, losing four teeth after a date with the vinyl covered concrete bottom.” PROFESSIONAL WORLD SURF LEAGUE LONGBOARDER WHO SUFFERED CATASTROPHIC INJURY WHILE PRACTICING FOR EVENT AT SURF RANCH TURNS TO GOODNESS OF OTHERS TO PAY EXORBITANT MEDICAL BILLS! https://beachgrit.com/2022/02/professional-world-surf-league-longboarder-who-suffered- catastrophic-injury-while-practicing-for-event-at-surf-ranch-turns-to-goodness-of-others-to- pay-exorbitant-medical-bills/ Lawsuit Filed Against BSR Surf Resort THE PARENTS OF FABRIZIO STABILE–A NEW JERSEY SURFER WHO PASSED AWAY FROM A BRAIN-EATING AMOEBA AFTER SURFING BSR’S WAVEPOOL LAST YEAR–ARE SUING BSR CABLE PARK FOR DAMAGES APRIL 23, 2019 BY SURFER SOCIAL ICON WEBSITESOCIAL ICON RSSSOCIAL ICON TWITTER Emergency Response Excerpts from 08/12/2020 Letter CAL FIRE Riverside County, Riverside to MSA Consulting, Inc. • The proposed project will have a cumulative adverse impact on the Fire Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service.These impacts include an increased number of emergency and public service calls due to the increased presence of structures, traffic and population.The project proponents/developers will be expected to provide for a proportional mitigation to these impacts via development impact fees. • Further review of the project will occur upon receipt of building plans. Additional requirements may be necessary at that time. SUMMARY MANY SAFETY CONCERNS •POOL DEPTH? HEAD INJURIES? •BOTTOM SURFACE -- HOW SOFT? HOW HARD? •WILL HELMETS BE REQUIRED? •BLOOD IN THE POOL -- DRAIN? REFILL? CLEAN? •POOL EQUIPMENT? HOW SAFE? •WATER QUALITY? •consistent 100 + degree desert heat and constant sun? •HEAT STROKE? •EMERGENCY RESPONSE – RESOURCE INTENSIVE? Tourist Commercial Zone Change Analysis Lori Kilburn La Quinta Let’s examine this statement that justifies the Zoning Change “The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south- central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA.” Let’s Start with Centre Pointe •On the corner of Washington and Miles •It is next to Homewood Suites •What was the equivalent “Wave Pool” attraction? •Perhaps the Applebee’s Nearby? •Or Eisenhower Medical Office? •Or they wanted to live nearby a hotel? •Or perhaps they wanted nice housing? Equivalent to Coral Mountain Surf Resort? “The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA.”FALSE Let’s Move to Legacy Villas •At Eisenhower and Coachella Drive •Great STVR Community with nice pools and next door to La Quinta Resort •Easy access to Old Town, X Park, Living Desert Zoo, hiking trails, etc. •What was the equivalent “Wave Pool” attraction? •No equivalent either Equivalent to Coral Mountain Surf Resort? “The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA.”FALSE Let’s Look at Travertine •Not in front of City Council Yet •Southeast of Coral Mountain •Will be developed in the Flood Plain behind the Thomas E Levy CVWD replenishment facility •Will need three bridges over the berm that was built by the Army Corp of Engineers to protect the area from flooding •Bridge From 62nd •Bridge From a new Madison extension •Bridge From 58th and a new Jefferson extension •This project should not get the time of day from anyone FALSE Now about PGA West •Already existing Golf Course and homes •What was the equivalent “Wave Pool” attraction? •Probably the existing golf course or STVRs •No new attraction had to be built to bring people there FALSE Silver Rock •From the Silver Rock website: Owned by the City of La Quinta and managed by Landmark Golf Management, SilverRock Resort's Arnold Palmer Classic Course is a challenging 7,239 yards, sprawling over 200 acres with massive native bunkers and stunning water features. Set against the backdrop and natural beauty of the Santa Rosa Mountains, SilverRock is a former home course of the PGA Tour's Bob Hope Classic from 2008-2011. •Golf Course has been there for years and years and the hotels and housing are finally getting built •The Golf Course is the “daytime” feature •Backdrop and natural beauty of the Santa Rosa Mountains are not being compromised day or night by an equivalent Wave Park feature FALSE Let’s Examine this statement about the Coral Mountain Resort Location •“Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods.” •CVWD has confirmed that due to the Thomas E Levy pipelines, no other location was available on this property Where is Cantera –on the south side of 58th bounded on two sides by Coral Mountain Resort –taken from middle of wave pool location. Cantera will not be shielded Cantera 11 How about Lisa Castro’s and Guillermo Casillas’ houses –this picture is taken from the zone in the area of the light demonstration right by the wave pool –no shielding here There is nothing true about this statement “Its location at the south-central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods.” “The proposed addition of Tourist Commercial lands to the property will represent a change from the land uses in Andalusia and Trilogy, as well as the smaller subdivisions occurring in the area. However, the inclusion of Tourist Commercial land in master planned communities in the City is not unusual, and is included at Centre Pointe, PGA West, SilverRock, Legacy Villas, and Travertine Specific Plans. Its location at the south- central portion of the site provides for a buffer from existing surrounding neighborhoods, and would be fully shielded from public view, or views from surrounding existing neighborhoods. As analyzed in the project EIR, the impacts associated with this land use are less than significant from the perspective of CEQA.” There is not a true word in this whole statement which is the basis of your Zoning Change You Cannot Change the Current Zoning from low density residential to Tourist Commercial •There is no basis in fact to change this area to Tourist Commercial •To do so is subscribing to falsehoods and is an abdication of your responsibility to the residents of La Quinta and to the 2035 General Plan More Problems with the EIR Katrina Chevalier Significant Issues with IID –Ongoing meetings with Cities on how to deal with IID and electrical issues •How will electricity be provided for Coral Mountain and projects? •That is a significant issue with Coral Mountain Surf Resort because the wave mechanism uses significant amount of energy, the highest of any artificial wave mechanism What does the DEIR say about IID and power •In a will serve letter dated May 26, 2020, IID indicated that it can extend electrical facilities to serve the site. Therefore, with the project’s connection to the IID substation, it is anticipated that IID’s existing and planned electricity capacity and electricity supplies would be sufficient to support the project’s demand. IID has indicatednthat additional offsite improvements will be required to meet the project’s power demand. The project will be required to install twelve, 6-inch conduits along Avenue 58 to bring additional power to the siteand install a transformer bank at IID’s existing substation yard located at Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. •The offsite improvements for the conduit system will take place in the existing right of way, on both sides of Avenue 58, between Andalusia and PGA West, and on Madison Street, west of Andalusia. Avenue 58 is an improved road and classified as a secondary arterial. These improvements would occur along the existing right-of-way and will be installed underground during Phase I of the development. The purpose of the extension is to provide electricity to the project only. This referenced Will Serve Letter was expired at the time of the DEIR so the DEIR contained invalid and misleading information •We were told by Ms.Criste that the DEIR did not need to include a Will Serve letter so it is not an issue •But reviewers all were mistaken that the power requirements would be met The Final EIR references the same IID Will Serve letter which says IID can provide electricity to the Coral Mountain Surf Resort •The project will be required to make offsite improvements for electrical power to the site. The project will be required to install an off-site transformer bank at an existing IID substation located at 81600 Avenue 58 and extend a distribution line along Avenue 58. Conduit systems will also be installed along Avenue 58 as part of the proposed upgrades. Construction of the conduits and line extension would occur in the existing right-of-way. The extension of IID’s infrastructure will provide electricity exclusivity to the proposed project. The project’s connection to the existing IID infrastructure will occur during the first phase of development and will be for exclusive use of the proposed project. In a letter dated May 26, 2020, IID concluded that electrical facilities can be extended to serve the project, under the conditions in the will serve letter. The Referenced Will Serve letter is again the expired May 26, 2020 letter •Mr. Gamlin indicated that a new Will Serve letter was issued in the fall of 2021 and that it did not need to be referenced in an EIR •However, in the Final EIR issued in February 2022, the same expired Will Serve letter is referenced •Why was the new Will Serve letter not referenced? •In a public records request, the City stated it did not have a copy of the new Will Serve letter •How can we believe in the integrity of the EIR if we know there is erroneous information in it? You Cannot Certify the EIR for Coral Mountain •The integrity of the EIR is called into question •We have documented for you numerous discrepancies •How many more are there? Evaporation Mr. Robin Probst La Quinta What are the assumptions for Wave Pools •Currently, CVWD Landscape Ordinance defines a “Water Feature” as any water applied to the landscape for non-irrigation, decorative purposes, including fountains, streams, ponds and lakes. The Wave Basin is considered a water feature under CVWD Landscape Ordinance No. 1302.4. •Water features use more water than efficiently irrigated turf grass and are assigned an evapotranspiration adjustment factor of 1.1 for a stationary body of water and 1.2 for a moving body of water for this reason. •The proposed Wave Basin is essentially a lake with moving water and is why the factor of 1.2 is used to estimate evaporation at Coral Mountain Surf Resort in La Quinta. Hydrologist defined area to calculate •A six foot wave that will be traveling for almost a half mile has more surface area than just the base area of the pool. •For example, if the Wave Basin water surface is 12.5 acres, the actually square footage surface area to be calculated for evaporation is significantly higher and must account for the total 6 foot wave surface. Other evaporation considerations •If the wave itself does wash over areas, those areas must be considered for evaporation as well. •Our significant wind events must be used in any calculations for evaporation as water will be absorbed into the air at a much higher rate since the air is moving and won’t become saturated. •Pan evaporation numbers that were used as part of the calculations for evaporation by CVWD have not been updated since 2005. That year the Indio area had only 99 days over 100. In 2020, for example, we had over 140 days over 100 and significantly higher temperatures. This would cause significantly more evaporation. WADI adventure Surf Park located in a desert •WADI Adventures in the United Arab Emirates is the only other Wave Pool in a desert environment. They had to pipe desalinated water from the coast for 140 miles so they knew exactly how much water was added to the pool. •Their pool was only 2.8 Million gallons and 3 acres. From May to November they added 40,000 gallons and from December to April they added 10,000 gallons. •PLEASE NOTE: They cooled their pool to 84 degrees for the protection of their surfers from the potential of heat stroke and from deadly protozoa. So cooler water evaporates less than the Coral Mountain Wave Basin water which will be in the 90’s in the summer Replenishment at WADI due to evaporation •Summer replenishment was 1.5% a day which equates to 270,000 gallons for our Coral Mountain 18 million gallon pool, if our pool was only at 84 degrees. •That is 38 Million gallons for only 140 days, vs. the CVWD calculated 24 Million gallons for a whole year. And this is not including the wind events and higher water temperatures. •And is only 140 days, not a full year. It also does not include the extra surface area of the wave that is exposed to evaporation. Evaporation in Lemoore •For your information, the Kelly Slater Wave Pool in Lemoore, California, the equivalent pool, size and technology of the Coral Mountain Wave Basin, has said that they lose 250,000 gallons of water on hot days in 2020. •That year they only had 40 days over 100 degrees, with the hottest day 107 degrees. La Quinta had 140 days over 100 degrees with the high temperature of 124 degrees. EPA formula Calculation vs. Actual Golf Usage •We did calculations using an EPA formula that takes wind and high temperatures into effect. We only used monthly averages and that came to 740 acre feet or 260 million gallons of evaporation a year versus the 24 million calculated by CVWD •A water bill for a local 18 hole golf course was 165 Million gallons of water consumption in a year. This is lot less than the surf pool. •The golf course was down 15% year over year in the summer, and overall down year over year. Golf courses can conserve. Surf pools cannot conserve. 15% less water means a surf pool cannot operate. They must close. Wave Pool Evaporation will be significant higher than calculated by CVWD •A Surfing Wave is not a moving lake •CVWD did not bother to explore more accurate means of calculations to address the Wave Pool •You cannot approve the Coral Mountain Surf Pool because it will significantly exceed your MAWA in the middle of a historic drought project Good afternoon Mayor Evans, Council Members and panel. I am Carol Strop, a CPA, and I love living in La Quinta. You have in front of you a copy of the cover of the 40th anniversary issue of the Gem and on the flip side is the ad you ran in celebration. The cover has photos of 40 years of people having fun in a myriad of ways. But what else beside the magnificent mountains, blue skies and starry nights have made La Quinta special? It’s because of the foresight, guidance and planning of city government, from our four and six lane wide streets that never seem to be littered, to our new bike lanes, to the manicured landscapes along the roads, to all the new outdoor patios, to the composting program already in place, to the dog friendliness of the city, and to the parks. Right outside the door, how lucky we are to have such a gorgeous place, with its magical fountain and pathways to meander in the shade, with a bridge to stand on and to marvel at the antics of the ducks. A place to honor our Veterans. No wonder La Quinta is truly the Gem of the Desert. Of course, I am standing here to talk about the Coral Mountain Development. But what could I possibly say that’s new? I could quote the surfer who described the Wave as “Super noisy just like a freight train barreling along the track”. I could tell you about my futile search to find a video of the sound of the Wave in Lemoore without music overlaid. I could tell you that the hottest month in Lemoore is July – a mere 96 degrees. But you already know all that. It takes 5 and one half hours to drive to Lemoore. I have not heard that anyone went there. So go, hear the Wave first hand, and see how popular it is. Interview the nearby cattle in the wide open farmlands to see what they think. Bring back a video to the next Council meeting. That is called due diligence. Until then it is too soon to vote. Is the Wave at Coral Mountain in harmony with the surrounding communities? Of course not, we are not farmlands. But you know that too. Approving the Wave with its noise, music, and lights would be a slap in the face. You have heard the residents’ overwhelming concerns and well researched opposition to Coral Mountain rezoning for two years now, on, oh so many, issues. And why is that? It’s because we have much more at stake than just money, and so do you. We are not going to stop fighting. And that is not good for anyone. Now, look at your beautiful ad. It begins with a quote from Alphonse de Lamartine, a poet and politician. “History teaches everything, even the Future” and thanks the residents for the City’s success. And I say thank you. Please, just keep doing what the city councils have done for 40 years, treasure our City. Right now you have the opportunity to write your own history and La Quinta’s future. Forget what you may have already decided, or committed to. Will you be remembered as the City Council who valued its coffers over its constituents and led the City into prolonged legal battles? Or instead will you be highly praised for “proudly walking the path” that continues to enhance La Quinta’s quality of life, for its residents. I think it is an easy choice. Thanks for listening Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Philip Novak, Professor Emeritus La Quinta As we know: •Greenhouse gas emissions, 80% of which are CO2,act like a blanket, making the earth warmer, exacerbating climate change and its negative effects. The Wavepark’s Carbon Footprint •Powered by CO2 -emitting fossil fuels, the Wave Machine’s large underwater blade, must push 18 million gallons of water, a distance of more than 3 football fields, 50 times per day, virtually 365 days per year. •The Wave Basin’s construction will require 16.7 acres (13 football fields) of cement. 6% of global GGH emissions come from the creation and processing of cement. •Year -round vacation commuting to the Wavepark’s STVRs and Hotel will only enlarge the Project’s carbon footprint. •The Developer’s touting of the Project’s walkability as a Carbon Footprint reducer is, proportionally speaking, ridiculous. Wavepark Environmental Impact, even acc to the DEIR •The DEIR (4.7—19-20) states that the Project will generate GHG emissions totaling 6.46 metric tons of CO2e per service population per year. This 77% more than the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s applicable significance threshold of 3.65 metric tons. •The DEIR notes that this situation cannot be offset via carbon credits because 1) the Coachella Valley has not broadly adopted carbon credits as acceptable mitigations for residential and resort projects; and 2) the City cannot determine with certainty that GGH emissions will thereby be reduced to a less than significant level. •The DEIR concludes: the Project’s GHG impacts should be considered significant and unavoidable. GHG Emissions are just one more reason this Wavepark is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong time. City Council Members: Please don’t use the “Statement of Overriding Considerations” to ignore this Project’s admittedly significant and ‘forever’ Greenhous Gas Emissions. If you approve the Wavepark , What lesson are you teaching the students and future leaders of our community??? City of La Quinta Council Members and Staff – We are in an unprecedented water insecurity time Alena Callimanis 81469 Rustic Canyon Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253 919 606-6164 1 From CVWD on May 17 Colorado River background 3 General !serves 40 M people !in drought since early 2000s System stats !"delivery obligation #16.5 maf !storage conditions #2000 -57 maf (95%) #2022 –20 maf (34%) 2022 -23 $200 M for system conservation projects 2019 (Drought Contingency Plan) Management actions 2003 (QSA) 2007 (Interim Guidelines) 2021 (500+plan) Dec 31, 2025 2007 Interim Guidelines expire 2 California Leaders Response to this Unprecedented Megadrought Disaster in the Making •“We are in a drought unlike one we’ve seen before, and we have to take actions that we haven’t taken before,”Felicia Marcus, chairwoman of the State Water Resources Board. •“The severity of this drought requires all Californians to save water in every possible way,” said Joaquin Esquivel, chair of the State Water Resources Control Board,in announcing the new regulations. •The drought has exceeded the severity of a late-1500s megadrought that had been identified as the worst such drought in the 1,200 years the scientists studied. 3 From the Governor •As California stretches into its third year of drought,Gov. Gavin Newsom is warning local officials that more needs to be done to save water, and to make sure all residents realize how urgent the crisis is. •If not, Newsom said,Californians could face mandatory statewide water restrictions this summer 4 More Reactions to Required Cuts •"Metropolitan has never before employed this type of restriction on outdoor water use. But we are facing unprecedented reductions in our Northern California supplies, and we have to respond with unprecedented measures,"Adel Hagekhalil, the district's general manager, said in a statement. •“We don’t have enough water supplies right now to meet normal demand. The water is not there,”Metropolitan Water District spokesperson Rebecca Kimitch said.“This is unprecedented territory. We've never done anything like this before." 5 What is being said about Golf Courses? •“Any part of the golf course that is being used for the game of golf, such as the greens and the fairways, are functional,” said Edward Ortiz, a spokesperson for the State Water Board. •“However, water agencies and golf courses need to evaluate whether other turf on a golf course property is functional or not.” 6 Do not be misled that CVWD is exempt from any and all emergency regulations •As of two days ago, San Diego officials point out that San Diegans are currently using little, if any, water from the state’s imperiled Sacramento River Delta, which feeds urban and agricultural communities through the 705-mile State Water Project. Rather,the region imports more than half of its water from the Colorado River so San Diego claims they should be fine •However, California’s top water officials aren’t buying that logic. On Friday, they said the San Diego region needs to continue to cut back, especially since the Colorado River remains in the grip of a 22-year megadrought. 7 State’s Largest Water Agency Metropolitan Water Authority takes impactful action •The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California uses water from the Colorado River and the State Water Project to supply 26 public water agencies (Los Angeles, San Bernadino, etc.) that provide water to 19 million people, or 40% of the state's population. •The Metropolitan Water District declared a water shortage emergency in April and voted unanimously to curtail water use,either by restricting outdoor watering or by other means. 8 Drought and Cuts by the Numbers •As CalMatters’ tracker shows, California has been in a drought for 843 days •In March, the State Water Project, which supplies water to about two-thirds of the state population,cut its 2022 deliveries by 95%. •A month later, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the State’s largest supplier of drinking water, called for a 35% cut to water consumption 9 No one, not CVWD, not anyone, can say “We’re Good” anymore •“You look at the Colorado River, you look at these stressed systems,and it’s hard for anyone in the state to justify and say, ‘We’re good,”said Joaquin Esquivel, chair of the State Water Resources Control Board, during a recent hearing to approve the state’s new drought restrictions. •THE FACT THAT CVWD GETS IT WATER FROM THE COLORADO RIVER DOES NOT EXEMPT IT FROM THE SAME SEVERE WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES CURRENTLY BEING IMPOSED ON THE ENTIRE STATE 10 Mr. Gamlin, President Coral Mountain Wave Development, with his Response to the Desert Sun April 17 Editorial •“The editorial incorrectly states that wave basins must use “potable” water, meaning drinking water. To the contrary, non-potable water sources are appropriate with filtration and disinfection such that it meets all applicable regulatory requirements safe for recreational contact.” •This project does use the same potable water sources that CVWD, MWD and San Diego use, the Colorado River water. Whether it comes from the Canal or the aquifer, it needs to be treated for drinking. Gamlin’s statement in not only misleading, it truly is a lie. This project will not use non-potable and it only will use potable water. •Canal water is POTABLE Water. Coral Mountain will use Canal water which is Potable water. 11 Mr. Gamlin discusses the “Sustainability” of a Wave Park •Mr. Gamlin’s False Alternative of replacing golf with a sustainable surf park is a “Straw Man” argument •The Water does not exist for either and the framing of this argument is to deliberately mislead the public into thinking if the City Council does not approve the Surf Park they must approve the 18 hole golf course •CVWD water usage is predicated on the fact that under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, where all outflows must be matched by equal or greater inflows 12 We are Being Misled when Discussing Sustainability •Mr. Gamlin talked about CVWD using the worse case scenario of only receiving 45% of the State Water Project based on 2019 numbers •That ship has long sailed. For the last three allocations, the State Water Project has only supplied either ZERO % or 5 % of the CVWD State Water Project Allocation •So instead of getting 50,000 acre feet of SWP allocation, we are getting 0 to 6500 acre feet, a loss between 50,000 acre feet to 43,500 acre feet per year. •So we are already at a deficit of our aquifer, with more outflow than inflow 13 Significant Issues with the CVWD Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan •In December 2021, CVWD approved the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update, which provides the most current assessment of the subbasin and other water supplies, including consideration of the potential for extended extreme drought conditions •In that plan, CVWD used the 45% SWP allocation, KNOWING FULL WELL THE ALLOCATIONS HAD BEEN 5% or 0% over the prior two years, no longer 50,000 acre feet •Also under this plan, CVWD noted they would be obligated to contribute approximately 14,000 to 24,500 AFY of their allocation back to the Colorado River Reservoirs •However, not only did their modeling not include the revised SWP allocations, but it did not include the potential for the Colorado River allocation return 14 Where we stand •We are entering the third year of the drought •All sources for water in the Coachella Valley are at record lows and will continue their decline •The only source of water in the Valley is the Colorado River •Canal Water is Colorado River Water which is the only type of water delivered to the Valley through the Canal 15 There is no end in site to this drought •This is an unprecedented time •You cannot just ignore what is going on right now •“As this drought persists into a third year,we are experiencing drier and hotter weather than ever before,”said California Natural Resources Agency Secretary Wade Crowfoot. “These conditions diminish our water supplies but also threaten energy reliability.We are adapting to these unprecedented conditions and working to find flexibilities where possible to safeguard both water supplies and grid reliability.” 16 This is not 2019 –This is now •IT'S REAL AND ITS GETTING MUCH WORSE.THESE CATASTROPHIC AND CURRENT MEGA-DROUGHT CONDITIONS WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE WATER STUDIES THE SUPPORTED THE CORAL-MOUNTAIN EIR. •TO DISREGARD OUR CURRENT AND FORESEEABLE FUTURE CATASTROPHIC MEGA-DROUGHT AND RELY UPON OUTDATED EIR DOCUMENTS AS A FORMALITY RATHER THAN REALITY IS TO COMPLETELY ABDICATE YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE PUBLIC THAT YOU ARE ELECTED TO REPRESENT. •AS BAD OR WORSE IS THE DIVISIVE DISTRUST OF YOUR LEADERSHIP IN GOING AHEAD WITH A PROJECT THAT DOES NOT REPRESENT YOUR RESIDENTS BUT ONLY A SMALL HANDFUL OF ELITIST MILLIONAIRES THAT CAN AFFORD TO "SURF" IN THE DESERT FOR $1,000'S OF DOLLARS AND RENT OUT PARTY HOUSES FOR $1,000'S . 17 Here is the City Response to this “Short Term Crisis” which is Short-Sighted “The Water Supply Assessment (WSA) prepared by the applicant considered detailed water demand calculations, which were analyzed in 2019 and reviewed and approved by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD).The analysis in the WSA is based on the requirements of State Water Code, and although it does consider long range planning conducted by CVWD for water supplies, including periods of drought and climate change,it does not address short term crises such as the current drought emergency, nor is it intended to.” •Why would a project like this even be considered during times of climate change?Why do they call this a “short term crisis” -do they have a crystal ball ? •This state of drought is unprecedented and scientists do not know how and when this will end. 18 La Quinta development is growing and visitors are coming •Visitors and new residents are flocking to La Quinta.Property values and visitation are at or very near all time highs.All of this new economic activity is happening without NEW SURF-PARKS, LAGOONS AND GOLF COURSES. •Monday June 6, 2022 Desert Sun: Home Prices up 20% April 2021 to April 2022 19 What will an approved surf park bring? •Instead of being a draw to La Quinta it will bring shame and derision AS an area of TONE-DEAF ELITISTS wasting our Precious and dwindling water on ELITE FRIVOLITIES BENEFITTING NO ONE BUT THE GET RICH QUICK DEVELOPERS and out of town SHORT TERM LANDLORDS TRYING TO GET RICH WASTING THE PEOPLE'S WATER. •Employment at the "Surf-Park" will, of course, be the lowest wage seasonal employment possible.This type of low wage employment certainly does not provide the long-term economic opportunities LaQuinta wants for its residents and the residents of surrounding areas. •In Fact, this Elitist SURF-Park provides a RANK example of exploitation of the disadvantaged La Quinta Residents and surrounding communities.20 Only one decision can be made •We are being gamed by Mr. Gamlin and the developers. This project is NOT for the residents or for the valley •In this unprecedented time, the only decision that can be made is No to the Coral Mountain Surf Resort 21 The statement of overriding considerations lacks credibility Rick Roth La Quinta Purported Justification Reason #1 •The project will generate substantial transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenue for the City from the proposed hotel, which the City Council considers a critical component of the project •“Mr. Gamlin has said that the hotel may not be built out. The STVRs are needed to ensure occupancy even during off season.” (Wave Pool is not a year-round amenity like we have said). Purported Justification # 2: •The project provides a unique opportunity to allow short-term vacation rentals (STVRs), at the homeowners’ option, that will also generate substantial TOT revenues for the City Initial Housing Buildout •104 units would be valued at $2.75 million, and 26 at $6 million. This represents the resort residential portion of the project located adjacent to the hotel and wave pool, as well as the 26 custom home sites located at the northwest corner of the resort complex. •The balance of the residential development, 470 units, average selling price of $2.3M would be built in Phase 3 of the project, and upon completion, would represent build out of the proposed project. The most recent development agreement makes TOT impossible to predict Certain Revenue the City will get from existing Developments in 2033 Looking at existing built houses as of today at PGA West Greg Norman, The Palms and Plaza Serena, Andalusia, Griffin Ranch, Trilogy, Santa Rosa Trail, Lion’s Gate, Santerra and Alta Verde. Today’s total assessed value = $2,155,196,284 Riverside Tax Rate approximately = 1.28614 So that comes to $27,719,057 in tax money that goes to Riverside. La Quinta gets 6.5 cents on the dollar from Riverside So that makes it $1.8M to La Quinta This does not count any new developments or new housing in the developments above NOT DEPENDENT ON AN UNDEFINED CORAL MOUNTAIN BUILDOUT There is no deficit that requires new revenues for fire protection A surf resort will create a deficit •As you saw earlier, Emergency Services are expected to be higher for Coral Mountain Surf Resort •The obvious low-risk alternative is a residence -only buildout at Coral Mountain that avoids this deficit STVR Revenue is still healthy in La Quinta •You do not know if the STVR moratorium will pass •A little over 10% registered voters have put the moratorium on the ballot in November •The initiative shows that voters wanted to restrict STVRs into the currently zoned tourist commercial areas •Why create a new Tourist Commercial Zone in face of that opposition The Real Estate Market is Hot •The primary or secondary home market is hot •The Pandemic has proved you can work from anywhere •This location without the wave resort is ideal for that family or couple •The views are the outstanding and the quiet at night is unmatched anywhere in La Quinta •Black skies here are the envy of the Rancho Mirage Observatory •Add more hiking, walking and biking trails to make this an ideal location Use creativity like Toll Brothers on 58th does to collect $613/year assessment for La Quinta Conclusions •The high risk for this project creates foreseeable risk of business failure and bankruptcy •After bankruptcy, any promises made by the developer won’t be worth the paper it is written on •The only prudent development is residential only •From my point of view, proceeding with the proposed development under these circumstances would be a breach of fiduciary duty Business Session Item 1 Initiative Petition-Measure 1 From:Jim Alderson <jim10463@aol.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 1:35 PM To:City Clerk Mail; Monika Radeva Subject:Written Public Comment 6-7-2022 STVR Petition ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Written Public Comments for 6-7-2022 meeting RE:STVR Petition Dear Mayor and Council, I would like to address Table 1 on page 239 of the agenda. These are your numbers, as presented by the consultants. It is titled Direct STR 2-Bedroon+Visitor Indicators in La Quinta. I will address the most current numbers from 2021. There were 1,973,016 available nights and 223,598 occupied room nights. This is an occupancy rate of 11.3%. I think you would agree La Quinta has excess capacity of STVRs at this point. Using your assumption that 20% of available STR nights are in tourist/commercial zones, this measure would leave 20% of 1,973,016 available nights or 394,602 available nights if STVRs were banned in residential areas. So in 2021 the 223,598 occupied nights would have easily fit into the 394,602 available nights. The occupancy rate would have been 56.7%, and there would have been plenty of room for people wishing to rent an STVR in La Quinta. Your report shows hotel occupancy in the valley at around 75%. The report says it excluded any new STVRs coming on line. The Signature at PGA West is in a tourist/commercial zone and has 192 units. Thus there is a potential for 70,080 available nights for STVRs. This should have been factored in. In tourist/commercial zones the current available nights are 394,602, and if you add the Signature 70,080, you have 464,682 available days for STVRs in La Quinta, which would easily handle the 223,598 occupied nights in 2021. The occupancy rate would be 48.1% Your report makes the assumption that most all of the occupied nights would simply go away. There is nothing to substantiate this. It is very likely the renters would merely choose a rental in the tourist/commercial zoned areas, as there are plenty available. They would spend the same amount of money and no jobs would go away. If you assume renters will move to STVRs in tourist/commercial zones, then there is no loss of revenue to the city, and all the projected losses become meaningless. Thank You, Jim Alderson 81280 Legends Way La Quinta, CA 92253 760-771-5979 1 From:James alderson <jim10463@aol.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 7:52 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Homepage - TALUS | La Quinta Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Good Morning, Was this additional TOT revenue included in your economic review? It looks to me that there are plenty of places for people to stay outside of residential areas. I think the City has a fiduciary duty to it’s citizens to prepare an accurate economic analysis of the effect of moving STVRs out of residential neighborhoods. Thanks, Jim Alderson 81280 Legends Way La Quinta, CA. 92253 https://taluslaquinta.com/ Sent from my iPhone 1 From:James alderson <jim10463@aol.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 8:54 PM To:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: COMPLETED: Alderson, Jim 2022-06-06 New STVRs at PGA West - Signature Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hi Monika   Thanks for the quick response.  My point is that the impact of phasing out residential STVRs will be dramatically offset by  the new Signature STVRs, and I hope this is taken into account.  Jim Alderson  Sent from my iPhone  On Jun 6, 2022, at 7:18 PM, Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Good afternoon Mr. Alderson,  The City has received and processed your inquiry, sent via the email below and dated 6/6/2022.  The residential development referenced in your email, by Woodbridge Pacific Group, is the Signature at PGA West, which has a total of 230 unit, 130 single-family residential detached and 100 condominium units. Almost all units in the Signature development (except for 14 units) are with on of the exempt areas in the City that allows STVR uses.  This email correspondence completes the City’s response to this inquiry. Please let me know if we can be of further assistance. Thank you.  Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk  City of La Quinta  78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253  Tel: (760) 777-7035  MRadeva@laquintaca.gov  From: James alderson <jim10463@aol.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 7:03 PM  To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: New STVRs at PGA West  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement  and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  2 Good Morning,  Here is information showing an additional 192 units at PGA West. They are zoned for STVRs. Has this  been taken into account in your economic review?  Thanks,  Jim Alderson  81280 Legends Way  La Quinta, CA 92253  3 4     Sent from my iPhone  1 From:Edward Armendarez <edwardcarl888@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 1:44 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Edward Armendarez  La Quinta  760‐625‐1888  June 7th, 2022  Business Session ‐ City Council Item 1  Re: Accept and Approve Ballot Initiative “Phase‐out and Permanent Ban of Non‐Hosted Short‐Term Vacation Rentals  in Non‐Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta” by 12/31/2024.  Dear Ms. Mayor and City Council,  A broad spectrum of the citizenry of La Quinta, representing all parts of our beautiful City, have made their voices clear;  they want the opportunity to rid their residential neighborhoods of STVR mini‐motels, which are commercial enterprises  in residential zones.  People want their neighborhoods back and want to enshrine that in law.  That will happen in  November when this initiative is on the ballot and they can express to you their will.  Please do not thwart the will of the people.  Let their voices be heard.  Thank you for all that you do,   Edward Armendarez  1 From:Boyd Beghtol <boydbeghtol@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 12:07 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Stvr ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I’m a homeowner in La Quinta, and my house is within a hundred yards of two of these rentals. They constantly are doing drugs at these locations with my 3 little kids outside playing. These cause nothing but problems with noise and parking and the list goes on. Thanks, concerned homeowner. Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 11:08 AM To:Evette Bruesehoff Cc:Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva Subject:Bruesehoff, Evette: 6/7/2022 Written Comments - STVR Support Good morning Ms. Bruesehoff, The written public comments provided via your email below will be provided to the City Council at the 6/7/2022 regular meeting and will be included in the public record for the meeting. Thank you. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: Evette Bruesehoff <evette_bruesehoff@yahoo.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 10:31 AM  To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: WRITTEN COMMENTS ‐ 6/7/22  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Evette Bruesehoff La Quinta 562-713-1298 Regarding Short Term Rentals I am extremely concerned that that the City Council might ban short term rentals because of the extreme negative financial impact on the city of La Quinta. We moved to La Quinta from Long Beach, Ca where we lived 25 years. La Quinta is the beautiful, safe, small town we wanted. The city is clean, has lovely parks and open spaces and city amenities. We feel safe here walking at night in Old Town. We are very worried a huge decrease in City income will ruin our new home city. If STR’s are banned the Council will be forced to cut city services. Please DO NOT ban STR’s. SINCERELY, Evette Bruesehoff 1 From:jv@dc.rr.com Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:14 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:FW: STVRs initiative - Tuesday Council Meeting today Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  I am a resident of La Quinta for 22 years and would not feel comfortable having a revolving door of people all around  the neighborhood as I feel our safety and tranquility would be jeopardized.     Please allow the initiative to be on the ballot in November.  Thank you.  Nancy Chiles, Resident  1 From:Noreen Diodati <nmd224@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 8:36 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments re 6/7/22 City Council Meeting agenda item: Ballot Initiative to eliminate rentals less than 28 days from zoned residential neighborhoods in La Quinta Importance:High ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Sir/Madam, We would like to show our support for letting all La Quinta citizens vote as to whether they want to stop the proliferation of short-term rentals in our city’s neighborhoods or continue to let “hotel businesses” thrive in our neighborhoods, to the detriment of knowing our neighbors and making La Quinta an affordable place to live. “Seasonal” renters (28 days or longer) are vested in being good neighbors, are aware of local mores, and support our community by shopping and “socializing” locally. The majority of short-term renters arrive for the weekend with their own groceries, alcohol and “no care” for their surroundings as they’re in “resort mode” (nothing wrong with that, just let them enjoy the multiple areas in our city that are appropriate for resort experience!). The city will continue to thrive with additional sales tax revenue through support for our local businesses, and continued STVR permit income through the multiple locales that are zoned for STVR use. PLEASE keep La Quinta the beautiful residential city we loved when we first moved here 10 years ago. Sincerely, Noreen & Joe Diodati, 81205 Legends Way, La Quinta CA 92253 408-313-0680 1 From:hsndetroit <hsndetroit@aol.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:09 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Comment on STVR ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Sarah Gelberd  54965 Avenida Herrera  310418 5554  I Very Much am AGAINST VIA  in writing and would like to speak also.  RESOLUTION NO. 2022‐018  ADOPT RESOLUTIONS: (A) ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY AN INITIATIVE  ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE PROPOSING THE “PHASE‐OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON‐HOSTED SHORT‐ TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON‐EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,” BY DECEMBER 31, 2024, AT THE  GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 [RESOLUTION NO. 2022‐018  Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S10+, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone  1 From:Dean Graves <dagraves810@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 6:02 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:WRITTEN COMMENTS Dean & Cathy Graves La Quinta, CA 303-949-8004 Business Session Agenda Item 1 STVR Residential Limits ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** My name is Dean Graves and my wife and I have owned a home in LaQuinta ( specifically PGA West) for nearly 9 years. The issue of short-rental properties in residential communities should be decided by a vote of all registered voters of our city. The vast majority of LaQuinta residents have purchased and live in homes in neighborhood communities, hoping/expecting to get to know their neighbors over time. To live in a “normal” neighborhood without a parking lot of 5 cars on either side of them, in the driveway and street. Where the neighboring homes are just that, and not mini hotels. This doesn’t even address the fact that it is farcical to continue to call communities like ours as gated. At any given time there could be 100 or more people within the gates that are not neighbors, but strangers. The renter might have a minimal background check, but what about the 4-8 others in the house. As to the study regarding revenue loss projections with the elimination of STVR’s, it strikes me as a scare tactic by those whose interests do not align with residents in these neighborhoods. First, the study speaks to revenue loss from renter spending on retail, food and entertainment. As these STVR properties become residences again, residents will also shop, eat out, etc. In fact, in many cases these residents will spend money year round, not sporadically around holidays and Spring festivals. Second, designated commercial residential properties could meaningfully replace revenues lost from STVR’s currently in our neighborhoods. This is understated in the study and no attempt to quantify this forward looking alternative is included. Lastly, the impact on job losses may also be overstated in the study. As these homes go back to owner-occupied residences, new hotels are completed and alternative Commercial residential alternatives are introduced, job impact could be minimal. As residents, we expect our local government to respond to the will of its constituents. Please listen carefully. Thank you, Dean and Cathy Graves Sent from my iPad 1 From:Jeff Hillebrand <jhillebrand1954@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 12:39 PM To:Jon McMillen; Monika Radeva Cc:Don Shoffstall; Jim Lambert; Rex Bloesser; Paul Spitzer; Don Nimis; Steve Bottom; Steve Weiss Subject:STR Referendum ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Jon and Monika, Please record our comments with the City Council. We cannot attend the Council meeting tomorrow night, but would make these comments if we could attend. Our comments are as follows; As you know, we have experienced unlicensed short term rentals in our PGA West neighborhood and have reported these activities on a continuing basis to Code Compliance. Kevin Meredith has been diligent in his follow up and has issued multiple citations. Unfortunately these have had little impact as the homeowners and their management companies have continued to violate City regulations including as recently as this past weekend when a short term rental occupied an unlicensed home. As you also know, recently there was an incident at an STR down the street from us that required response from Code Compliance, HOA security, and the Riverside Sheriff. Why would the City not do everything in its power to stop such activities? This continued behavior leads to unnecessary aggravation for full time La Quinta residents such as ourselves and our other neighbors. In addition there is enforcement expense that could be avoided, but for these illegal activities. We are fully supportive of putting this issue to a vote of registered voters in La Quinta. We also understand you are doing an economic impact study. Please include the impact of converting these businesses to homes occupied by residents of our community who will frequent local businesses, bring back a neighborhood feel to our communities rather than the party atmosphere that accompanies STRs and have other positive impacts on the quality of life of full time residents. We are supportive in allowing STRs in those areas that are appropriately zoned for such activity such as transient and village commercial districts including the Signature at PGA West that has over 250 homes that qualify rather than our residential area. Thank you for considering our point of view. Jeff and Nini Hillebrand 1 From:Alfredo <alfredomsv1@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 3:40 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Short term rentals Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To Whom it may concern,  I wish to express my opposition to the item listed as Business Item 1 to accept the resolution in support of terminating  short term rentals. Existing permit holders, who have been responsible in managing their properties and paying taxes  according to existing La Quinta laws should not be subject to this ban.  By doing so, the City would in effect, be taking  value away from those owners without any due compensation. This would be illegal under the US constitution regarding  takings by governmental entities without due compensation to the owners.  I respectfully request the council not  approve this resolution.  Alfredo Izmajtovich  Homeowner  77131 Calle Mazatlan  La Quinta, CA 92253  818‐612‐4882  Alfredomsv1@gmail.com  Sent from Mail for Windows  1 From:George M. Yin <gyin@kaufmanlegalgroup.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 9:28 AM To:Monika Radeva Cc:BIhrke@rutan.com; Laurie McGinley Subject:RE: Kaufman Legal Group: 6/7/2022 Council - VRON-LQ Letter re Rejection of Initiative Petition (003) (00400680xB613E).PDF Attachments:Title and Summary_ Notice of Intent.pdf ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Clerk Radeva,  Thank you for your message.  I would also like to add the attached document to the letter/documents that will be  distributed to the City Council and City staff.  They are true and correct pdf copies of the Title and Summary prepared by  the City Attorney, and the Notice of Intention submitted by the Initiative proponents.  I referred to these documents in  my letter and I will refer to them in my verbal comments.  Please provide these documents along with the letter I  submitted earlier so that City officials can have them for reference when considering my comments.  An additional note, I have recently been recovering from a mild case of covid‐19.  While I am beginning to come out of  isolation, I propose to make my verbal statements by online video.  I was informed that is possible.  Can the City and I  make arrangements for this to occur?  BTW, my cell phone is 323‐333‐5534, if you need that information.  2          From: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 7:27 PM  To: George M. Yin <gyin@kaufmanlegalgroup.com>  Cc: BIhrke@rutan.com; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; Laurie McGinley <lmcginley@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Kaufman Legal Group: 6/7/2022 Council ‐ VRON‐LQ Letter re Rejection of Initiative Petition (003)  (00400680xB613E).PDF  Good afternoon Mr. Yin, The written comments provided in this email will be distributed to Council and incorporated into the public record for this meeting. I have made a note that you wish to provide verbal comments during tomorrow’s meeting as well, please make sure to complete a request to speak form when you arrive and had it to a staff member. Thank you. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: George M. Yin <gyin@kaufmanlegalgroup.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 3:54 PM  3 To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: BIhrke@rutan.com; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: WRITTEN COMMENTS ‐ Emailing: VRON‐LQ Letter re Rejection of Initiative Petition (003)  (00400680xB613E).PDF  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **    Dear City Clerk Radeva,    In case you have not already arranged it, I request that the attached letter be included as a written comment  for the June 7 City Council meeting for Business Session Item NO. 1.  I also request to make spoken/verbal  comments to the City Council for Business Session Item No. 1 as a representative of my clients.    Per your instructions:    1) Full Name – George Yin, Kaufman Legal Group, attorney for Vacation Rental Owners & Neighbors‐LA Quinta  (VRON‐LQ)  2) City of Residence – Los Angeles  3) Phone Number  ‐ 213‐452‐6576  4) Public Comment or Agenda Item Number – Business Session Item No. 1  5) Subject – Serious Defects with Short Term Rental Ban Initiative Petition  6) Written Comments – Attached    I request to make spoken/verbal comments for the item.    If you have any questions, please let me know.        George M. Yin  Attorney  ………………………….................  Kaufman Legal Group, APC  777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 4050  Los Angeles, California 90017  213.452.6576  gyin@kaufmanlegalgroup.com    The information contained in this email, including any attachments, is confidential and may be attorney‐client privileged information and intended only for the  addressee.  Do not read, copy, or disseminate this email communication unless you are the addressee.  The information contained in this message is the property of  Kaufman Legal Group and its unauthorized use, disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please  immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies of this communication.  Thank you.    From: George M. Yin   Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 12:53 PM  To: levans@laquintaca.gov; kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov; jpena@laquintaca.gov; rradi@laquintaca.gov;  ssanchez@laquintaca.gov; jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov; mradeva@laquintaca.gov; BIhrke@rutan.com  Subject: Emailing: VRON‐LQ Letter re Rejection of Initiative Petition (003) (00400680xB613E).PDF  Dear Honorable Officials of the City of La Quinta:    4 For your immediate review, please find attached a letter regarding the rejection of an initiative petition submitted to the  City.    If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.        George M. Yin Attorney …………………………................. Kaufman Legal Group, APC 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 4050 Los Angeles, California 90017 213.452.6576 gyin@kaufmanlegalgroup.com The information contained in this email, including any attachments, is confidential and may be attorney-client privileged information and intended only for the addressee. Do not read, copy, or disseminate this email communication unless you are the addressee. The information contained in this message is the property of Kaufman Legal Group and its unauthorized use, disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you.   1 From:Jim Lambert <jnblambert212@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:50 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments June 7, 2022 ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Jim & Barbara Lambert  La Quinta, CA  760‐564‐2037  Addressing Business Sessions 1,2,3  Initiative to restrict STVRs to TC, VC and development agreement  communities.  Written comments will also be speaking.  Good afternoon, Mayor, council and staff.  The report commissioned by the City, is a great example of a self-fulfilling prophecy.  If the parameters given to the researcher ask what might be the negative impacts of eliminating STVRs, this is what you get.  Alternatively, the study shhould have projected numbers for transitioning current STVRs into existing and developing TC, VC and Developments with agreements over the 2 years until implementation of the initiative ordinance.  Those existing STVRs in Residential zones would be available for full time residents who would contribute to the local economy full time, not just the “room nights” of short term renters. In our own experience with the 4 “estate homes” within 500 feet of our home, 4 or more SUVs pull up to each house and unload people, booze, coolers of beer and food and then do not go anywhere.  According to the 2020 census La Quinta averages 2.55 people per household with a median household income of $75,724 which would be spent in the local economy full time, not by “room night”.  2 Additionally, transitioning the STVRs in the current moratorium to full time residents who most likely will work in the area increases the labor force and will provide housing for teachers, police and fire personnel.    Every child in school from Kindergarten to 12th grade provides funding from the Federal Government and the State Government. Governor Newsome’s proposed 22-23 budget proposes $20,000 per student, none of whom are from STVRs.    Transitioning STVRs to the areas zoned for them will eliminate the current incompatible interface between transient renters who frequently disregard common civility and the neighborhood residents in residential areas. Current TC zones have few complaints according to staff report February 25, 2021.    City staff reports fewer citations and complaints which is perceived as great progress in controlling STVRs. In reality, the conditions needed to meet noise complaint standards has most residents not trying anymore. Transient noise not witnessed by staff doesn’t qualify even though one might have been awakened by noise. Having a call to the responsible party for the rental doesn’t eliminate the fact one was awakened.    In multiple Council meetings some council members have referred to ”a few old people not liking the sound of happy vacationers.” I would say 3667 signatures, of which 3244 are La Quinta voters is more than a few, collected in less than half the allotted time.    I will cite the Report: “However, this growth hasn’t come without concerns, as many in residential neighborhoods view STRs as an inappropriate COMMERCIAL activity in parts of the community reserved for non commercial uses.”    “However, much of the lodging revenue paid flows to STR operators who live outside the area.”  “The City of La Quinta reports that 62% of permitted STRs in the community are registered to those who live outside the area.”    LET THE 24392 REGISTERED VOTERS WHO LIVE AND VOTE HERE DECIDE WHERE STVRS ARE APPROPRIATE, NOT THE 700 OR SO OUTSIDE INVESTORS.  3   To paraphrase General Eisenhower on D-Day, "The eyes of the La Quinta voters are on you."    Thank you, Jim & Barbara Lambert          Good afternoon city council members and community residents, My name is Alondra and I'm part of the team at Minut. As we can all agree, tourism has changed greatly in the last 2 year years. Short-term rentals were once an afterthought when planning a trip and now they offer a more affordable way to travel for families and remote workers alike. I'm here to urge you to reconsider the current proposal to ban short-term vacation rentals. These types of bans often do more harm than good, as it simply punishes those who have done things legally (many of whom are also at this meeting). There are members of your community here who have short-term rentals and who have registered for a legal permit to run and operate their business. They love hospitality and take great pride in hosting their guests. They make them feel welcome, giving them recommendations on their favorite local restaurants, boutique shops and even where to find the best golf courses. These hosts have gone through the hoops of getting a permit to run their business legally. Some of them have even voluntarily signed up for a pilot program on noise monitoring to tackle any potential noise complaints. So you may wonder, what does Minut have to do with all of this? We offer a device which allows hosts and property managers to monitor noise and occupancy and we’ve been working with numerous short-term rental owners in this community on that pilot program to ensure that they are the first to know about any noise issues at their properties. Our development team even worked with the city so that La Quinta (not the property owners) had full control over what the appropriate noise levels were and could not be tampered with. The sensors and free support allowed the ability to download noise data as a report so we could track how often the noise was truly an issue. Our program was set to last 3 months which was then extended into May at the requests of several property managers. Thanks to our program, the total number of noise disturbances at the residences with a permit to operate legally was cut down to 3. Our experience shows that vacation rentals experience a lot less issues with noise than the public perceives. And when a host has our device installed, 83% of incidents are resolved within 20 minutes or less. Of course, we can't forget the economic impact: According to a Visitgreatpalmsprings.org, short-term vacation rentals bring in $91 million in state and local taxes. It’s also estimated that about 4,200 jobs are sustained by the short-term rental vacation industry in Coachella Valley alone. There are many ways to help ensure that short-term rentals create a win-win situation, but banning them will not have any effect on those who are running their business illegally and will only punish those who have tried to do things the right way and rob the community of the economic benefits of tourism that is provided by short-term rentals. 1 From:lisa Moller <lisa.moller.urban@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 5:24 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  From: Lisa Moller  Resident of La Quinta , CA  Tel: 760‐899‐3756  Re: THE INITIATIVE PETITION ENTITLED “PHASE-OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON-HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,” BY DECEMBER 31, 2024[RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-017]  Dear Mayor, Hon. City Council and City Manager,  I have been a resident of La Quinta for 22 years.  I own two historic Casitas in the Cove that I have painstakingly  restored.  I live in one, and my daughter lives in the other.  I love my community and neighborhood and wholeheartedly  urge you to support the ballot initiative relegating STVRs to areas where they are allowed and eliminated completely  from residential zones by 2024. Neighborhoods and community are things of value and have not been appreciated as  they should.  STVRs are mini motels that place a burden of operation, without approval, on the neighborhood.  We  prefer neighbors, not an endless stream of transients.  Please honor the will of the people, your constituents, and not  kowtow to special interests and STVR owners who don’t even live here.  With thanks,  Lisa Moller  Sent from my iPhone  1 From:MARDE OLSON <mardeolson@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 10:51 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments re 6/7/22 City Council Meeting agenda item: Ballot Initiative to eliminate rentals less than 28 days from zoned residential neighborhoods in La Quinta ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Hello-we would like to show our support for letting all La Quinta citizens vote as to whether they want to stop the proliferation of short-term rentals in our city’s neighborhoods, or continue to let “hotel businesses” thrive in our neighborhoods, to the detriment of knowing our neighbors and making La Quinta an affordable place to live. “Seasonal” renters (28 days or longer) are vested in being good neighbors, are aware of local mores, and support our community by shopping and “socializing” locally. The majority of short- term renters arrive for the weekend with their own groceries, alcohol and “no care” for their surroundings as they’re in “resort mode” (nothing wrong with that, just let them enjoy the multiple areas in our city that are appropriate for resort experience!). The city will continue to thrive with additional sales tax revenue through support for our local businesses, and continued STVR permit income through the multiple locales that are zoned for STVR use. PLEASE keep La Quinta the beautiful residential city that we rented in for 7 years (always over 28 days!), and now live in full time! Sincerely, Marde and Mark Olson, 55898 Brae Burn, La Quinta 92253 952- 240-9019 Sent from my iPad 1 From:Kathleen Fitzpatrick Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 8:25 AM To:MARDE OLSON Cc:Bill Ihrke; Monika Radeva; Jon McMillen Subject:Re: RE ballot initiative to eliminate STVR’s from zoned residential neighborhoods…(meeting tomorrow 6/7) Written comments… Thank you for your email Ms. Olson. I appreciate you sending your comments to me regarding the STVR issues on the  agenda tonight.  I always appreciate the input of residents and will, of course, take your input into consideration tonight during  deliberations.  Kathleen Fitzpatrick | Council Member  City of La Quinta  78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253  Ph. 760.777.7030  E: kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov  www.laquintaca.gov   www.playinlaquinta.com  On Jun 6, 2022, at 11:45 PM, MARDE OLSON <mardeolson@gmail.com> wrote:  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution  when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hello-we would like to show our support for letting all La Quinta citizens vote as to whether they want to stop the proliferation of short-term rentals in our city’s neighborhoods, or continue to let “hotel businesses” thrive in our neighborhoods, to the detriment of knowing our neighbors and making La Quinta an affordable place to live. “Seasonal” renters (28 days or longer) are vested in being good neighbors, are aware of local mores, and support our community by shopping and “socializing” locally. The majority of short-term renters arrive for the weekend with their own groceries, alcohol and “no care” for their 2 surroundings as they’re in “resort mode” (nothing wrong with that, just let them enjoy the multiple areas in our city that are appropriate for resort experience!). The city will continue to thrive with additional sales tax revenue through support for our local businesses, and continued STVR permit income through the multiple locales that are zoned for STVR use. PLEASE keep La Quinta the beautiful residential city that we rented in for 7 years (always over 28 days!), and now live in full time!  Kathleen, PLEASE listen to us- there are plenty of WONDERFUL STVR sites in our city, which will generate more than enough revenue to support city efforts and still maintain our beautiful “residential” city! Please allow the voters to decide as to what our :city” looks like (lovely residential “small town” community with easy access to shops, restaurants, and cultural/arts events, OR “drive-by” vacation/resort “la-la land”).   Sincerely, Marde and Mark Olson, 55898 Brae Burn, La Quinta 92253 952-240-b  Sent from my iPad   1 From:David Park <ddukep@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:29 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  David Alan Park 56475 Legends Circle 760-564-2818 Phase out and permanent ban of STVR's in residential areas Written Comments: I fully support the initiative to transition short term rentals out of Residential zoned communities into the Transient Commercial, Village Commercial and Developments with agreements zoned communities; and I wish I could be there today but in lieu of that please accept my comments below as a plea for the city we all came here for. I feel certain that many of the items I would wish to bring up have probably already been written to the City Council or will be offered today at the meeting so I will limit my thoughts to personal comments and try to be brief. Back in 2015-2016 I served on an Ad-Hoc committee to come up with creative ideas to increase revenues for our city knowing with certainty that future impending budgets were at risk if we did not do something. After about a year or so with access to all city information our only recommendation was an increase in taxes - At no time was there ever a discussion about turning our neighborhoods and streets into "motel alleys" It would have been unthinkable to me and the twelve other people I served with. And yet here we sit today just six years later battling to save our neighborhoods from the corporations, etc. who don't care one bit about us or this city and quite frankly from my perspective a city council who are blinded by the almighty "dollar". Many of us spent our lives working hard to accumulate enough wealth to live in the "Gem of the Desert"; and we made big investments in this city and now I fear that this "Gem" of ours might be turning into "Cubic Zirconia". And finally I must say that I for one, and I know there were many more, served 9 years on the Investment Advisory Board because I believed that the City Council always had the best interest of homeowner- residents in mind - I am hoping that this is still true today! Please listen to the resident voters of La Quinta and let the voters decide if they want their neighborhoods back, or transient hotels next door. 2 Respectfully Submitted, David Alan Park 1 From:Carol & Tony <cspaml44@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 2:42 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Initiative signatures Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Good day to each City Council Member of La Quinta: We are year-round residents who have resided at PGA West for 10 years. We totally support the Initiative that is being discussed at the June 7th meeting. Unfortunately we are not able to personally attend the meeting, but the fact that over 3,000+ registered residents have come forward showing their total support by signing the Petition is evidence of the support and the end result desired to maintain La Quinta as a friendly, quiet, neighborly community. We urge you all to vote in favor of moving this Initiative to the November ballot. Thank you, Carolsue Peyton Anthony Laperuto Registered Voters and Residents 55378 Firestone La Quinta, CA 92253 Sent from my iPad 1 From:Jennifer Porter <jennifer.porter@hillrom.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 12:44 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Jennifer Porter  La Quinta Cove  916 835 3622  Business Session‐STVR  Opposition to the STVR ban and initiative measure  Dear Mayor and City Council members, I am a proud owner of a cherished second home in the Cove of La Quinta. When  myself, family, and friends are not visiting (which we visit often), I do open my home to short term rental guest. I am an  excellent host, friendly with my neighbors, and feel very much part of this wonderful community. I, and my family and  friends, are contributors to the city of La Quinta and so are the wonderful guest staying during our time away.   I want to express my strong opposition to any measure banning short‐term rentals in La Quinta. The new restrictions,  fines, increased fees, 2 strikes policy, permanent moratorium on new permits, and increased enforcement that you, the  Mayor and City Council implemented, are working!! The numbers tell the truth and the main offenders remaining are  unlicensed/unpermitted rentals that will not go away from this proposed ban. Conversely, there will certainly be less  resources to manage the illegal short term rentals without the STVR program dollars and enforcement since more than  70% of the STVR revenue/TOT would be lost. A lose‐lose situation.  As the city of La Quinta still works to recover from the pandemic, we ought to be doing everything in our power to  support small businesses and local employees. Banning short‐term rentals, however, would have the opposite effect.  Visitors staying at short‐term rental properties directly contributed over $145 million into our local economy last year  per the recent impact report. That revenue supports so many of the restaurants, shops, theaters, and other businesses  that make La Quinta a truly incredible place to live and visit. If that revenue dried up from a ban on short‐term rentals,  La Quinta residents (full and part time) would all pay a heavy price. Many of these businesses could be forced to close or  lay off workers. A small but significant example and one close to home is one of my neighbors has taken on the role of  my STVR assistant/manager. She and her husband, 30+ year long term residents, rely on this second income to provide  for themselves and their four children. There isn’t an equivalent opportunity that would allow the same income/time  ratio while raising a family. Another long‐term resident has created a fulltime living around STVRs as a cleaner/assistant,  doesn’t know what to do if this moves forward but one of the options she is considering is moving. These examples are a  direct impact if a STVR ban goes forward but the collateral damage to so many different business entities is very real.   Our business community would not be the only aspect of our city hurt by a ban on short‐term rentals. La Quinta's city  budget depends on the millions of dollars in tax revenue these properties bring in. That money pays for essential  services like firefighters and police officers and helps pay for the upkeep of our parks, playgrounds, and other public  spaces that we all take for granted. Without that revenue, we would likely see our taxes raised to fill in the gap. Speaking  as a La Quinta home owner and part time resident, trading higher taxes for a ban on short‐term rentals is simply an  unacceptable proposition.  2     Please, reject this misguided measure that will hurt our city's finances and damage our quality of life in La Quinta. If this  measure moves forward, I will NOT be selling my home.  It will sit vacant for a much greater portion of the time. I don’t  see how that helps local businesses or the community?! Please say NO to the STVR initiative and ban!    Sincerely, Jennifer Porter         CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not authorized to intercept, read,  print, retain, copy, forward, or disseminate this communication. This communication may contain information that is  proprietary, attorney/client privileged, attorney work product, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If  you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone or by return e‐mail, and  destroy all copies of this message, electronic, paper, or otherwise.  1 From:trpracht@earthlink.net Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:49 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:FW: Written Comments regarding approving STVR Issue on November Ballot ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Comments respectfully submitted by Patricia A. and Terry R. Pracht 80900 Weiskopf, La Quinta CA 92253      760‐777‐ 8026  As individuals who helped solicit signatures on the petitions to place the STVR Issue on the November ballot, we offer  the following comments for your thoughtful consideration:  Although we understand there is a challenge by the association of vacation renters, it is our understanding that the petition we circulated for signatures was prepared by and approved by the La Quinta City Attorney.  In fact, we had to start over collecting signatures to ensure that the petitions we circulated were in fact in compliance with applicable laws and ordinances. Now that the County has certified the signatures on the petitions, we firmly believe that the citizens of La Quinta are entitled to vote on the matter, since well more that the ten percent of registered voters required have indicated they want the opportunity to vote on the matter consistent with what other desert cities have done. STVR’s at PGA West are negatively affecting our quality of life and the citizens should be able to decide if they want to live in residential communities or small business communities. In our case we have a rental two doors from us that is rented almost every week/weekend.  With noise at all hours day and night.  The same property was previously rented for several months at a time, and we never had any issues with long term renters.  Once the property turned over, it’s been nothing but problems.  It was purchased by a realtor from Newport for the express purpose as a short‐term rental.  He only cares about his income!  Not our quality of lfe. We also believe the study was significantly flawed as it assumes those renting short term now in La Quinta, will no longer rent in La Quinta.  We know that is inaccurate from those renting here now that have commented they will look for another place to rent in La Quinta.  For example, many renting at PGA west will still be able to rent at the Signature which is zoned for short‐term rentals.  And as short‐term renters are replaced with longer term renters, La Quinta will sill have an economic benefit. Finally, if the loss of revenue proves to be too significant to the City, then we would propose to replace that income with another method of “taxation” that is broad based, such as an (another) increase in the sales tax rate.  Please let the citizens decide! We feel that short term rentals should only by allowed in areas specifically zoned for that purpose. Lost revenue to the city should not be more important than quality of life. Terry R. Pracht, D.D.S., M.S. Board Certified Specialist in Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office preventeddownload of this picture from the Internet.   Virus-free. www.avg.com   1 From:Stefanie Segal <stefsmnca@msn.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 9:51 PM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:Marv Segal Subject:Short Term Rentals ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** We have had the misfortune of living next door to a known “party house” for a year. It is indescribable the amount of people in and out, the noise, yelling and music plus the cars that impacted our daily living both inside and outside our home. No one and nothing seemed to impact the owners decision to cease this type of rental situation. We were even told they could care less about fines as they could afford them! Since that horrible year the constant activity has quieted down and our desert life is now more like living in a nice, neighborly community. We attribute this miracle to the wonderful people who made it known to the City Council that this will not be tolerated. The short term rental people realize they cannot continue to run a hotel business in a residential neighborhood and they fear losing their license if they follow on this path. Now we hope the City Council will follow up on all the hard work the residents of La Quinta have done and voted for to make our neighborhoods safe and quiet. SHORT TERM RENTALS DO NOT BELONG IN RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES!!! Marv & Stefanie Segal Sent from my iPad 1 From:Mario Sewell <mariosewell2@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 12:08 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments -- June 7, 2022 Council agenda ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  My name is Mario Sewell. I am a resident of the City of La Quinta.   I would like to submit written comments on two June 7, 2022 City Council Agenda items:  Business Session: Agenda Items #1, #2 and #3.  I urge Council approval of all the above items. City residents met the legal requirements to place the initiative on the  ballot of a future election.  Joint Council meeting with Housing Authority.  Agenda item approving Coral Mountain wave project.  We are at the beginning of a megadrought of historic proportions. The proposed wave park is not a priority compared to  water needed for residents and visitors.  Mario Sewell  1 From:Carine Topal <carine515@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 3:04 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Carine Topal Residing in La Quinta 310-809-8578 Public Comment The N4N Ban of STVR/Deception Comments: Several months ago, as I entered the Stater Bros shopping parking lot, I saw two people who were speaking with others in front of the market. I approached and overheard something about STVR. I addressed then man taking signatures and said, "I am a STVR owner. Is this FOR the STVR or against. He said FOR. I signed the form and the next day I told my husband to do the same. He did. When I found out that in fact the signatures were against the STVR I felt deceived and tricked into signing. Subsequently, I had both of our signatures removed. I say we should all play fair. We all want our city to thrive. I am a responsible home owner and proud of the City of La Quinta. I take care of my home and the people who rent from me. I pay $750.00 annually for the privilege to rent my home through AirBNB, and I contribute 11% of any of the monthly rents that I accrue. The culprits are those who choose to rent their home illegally and those who are not mindful of the city ordinances. They are the trouble makers. We assist the restaurants, galleries, shops on Main Street and beyond by renting our homes, discreetly, carefully, to prospective renters who enjoy supporting our lovely town. The few who are mavericks and do not follow the rule of law are the reason why STVR are in jeopardy. Thank you, Carine Topal 1 From:Davis Meyer <davis@visitgreaterps.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 2:47 PM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:Scott White; Linda Evans Subject:Public comment for June 7, 2022 - Business Session items 1-3 Attachments:6_7_22 business session items 1_3.pdf ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Clerk: Please find the written public comment for the June 7, 2022 joint meeting of the city council and housing authority regarding “Business Session” items 1-3 attached. Thank you, davis meyer director of partnership o: 760-969-1360   Public Hearing Item No. 1 In Support 1 From:Karen Ahaesy <karen.ahaesy@compass.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:17 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:I Support Coral Mountain! ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  I would like to send my support for the coral mountain development… I think this would be such an amazing addition to  our wonderful community.  Karen Ahaesy  REALTOR®  DRE#: 02026751  74199 El Paseo, Suite 200  Palm Desert CA 92260  m: 323.445.9838  To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 3:49 PM To:Wesley Ahlgren Cc:Consulting Planner; Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva Subject:Ahlgren, Wesley: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Attachments:Letter of Support Coral Mountain.pdf Good afternoon, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the project at the 6/7/2022 public hearing and will be included in the public record for the project. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: Wesley Ahlgren <wesley.ahlgren@hemmingwaygroup.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 3:22 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Wesley Ahlgren President The Hemmingway Group 619-890-7178 wesley.ahlgren@hemmingwaygroup.com www.hemmingwaygroup.com PO Box 13451, Palm Desert CA 92255 June 6, 2022 Mayor Linda Evans, Councilmembers, and Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78494 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Coral Mountain Wave Project in La Quinta – Letter of support Dear City Leaders: Today marks the 78th anniversary of the largest amphibious liberation in the history of mankind. This is an important reminder that our Republic was founded and fought for the principles of democracy, individual freedoms, and property ownership rights. This is a follow-up letter of support for the Coral Mountain project in La Quinta. After further review and discussion, I believe this project should be approved even more now. While I recognize the myriad of concerns from some community members, I find these concerns to be more emotional and reactionary than based on fact and science. As we often see, it is always easy to be against something but very hard to be for something. The most important decisions of local elected officials are those of local land use. However, those land- use decisions are made easier by zoning, specific plans, and land use regulations that have been enacted over the years. From all appearances, this project meets those requirements mentioned above. You will undoubtedly hear from community activists who are genuinely opposed to this project. Still, I would remind you that the principles of our Republic are rooted in individual liberties, freedoms, and, yes, property ownership rights. While property owners don't have unlimited rights, they do have a reasonable expectation of the right to control their property within the construct of local land use policy. Property owners also have obligations, which will undoubtedly be detailed in the Conditions of Approval for this project. This is where you can address the concerns of the community. You will have to navigate the delicate balance of property ownership and community participation as elected officials. Indeed not an enviable task in this case but one you are all well suited to. I encourage the City Council to approve this project after conducting its own careful review. Kindest regards, Wesley Ahlgren 49500 Loren CT La Quinta CA 92253 1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:23 AM To:Tim Albinson; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Albinson,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Tim Albinson <talbinson@emergentpartners.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 6:01 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  I am in full support of the Coral Mountain Wave Project. The project will bring jobs and investment to the valley as well  as continue to position the community as a leader in terms of tourism, recreation and healthy lifestyle. It is thoughtfully  planned and will be a marvelous addition to the valley landscape!  All the best  Tim Albinson  1 From:Maria Allgood <maria@allgoodinteriors.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 12:21 PM To:Consulting Planner; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Great, thank you so much!   Get Outlook for Android  From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 11:49:18 AM  To: Maria Allgood <maria@allgoodinteriors.com>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi  <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve  Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   Ms. Algood,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Maria Allgood <maria@allgoodinteriors.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 11:35 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear La Quinta City Council Members:  I'm writing this letter to support the Coral Mountain project. I am a landowner myself in La Quinta. I feel the Coral  Mountain development would be a great addition to the city of La Quinta,. This would supply housing that is so  2 desperately needed, as well as additional income for the city.  The exceptional amenities of the development would  offer tourists a unique experience.  I am especially impressed with the developer's considerable amount of due diligence  in their proposal.  Their sensitivity to the architectural design complements and enhances the desert surroundings, while  taking extensive measures to preserve the environment.  I feel wholeheartedly that this development would enhance  and enrich the lives of those who live in the desert, and the visitors that come to experience the beautiful city of La  Quinta.  Sincerely   Maria Allgood       Get Outlook for Android  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 4:58 PM To:Jon Arman; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Arman,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Jon Arman <jon@visualguyser.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 3:48 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear La Quinta City Council Members,  My name is Jon Arman and I am writing to you in support of the Coral Mountain Wave Project. I really believe that Coral  Mountain would be an incredible value addition to your wonderful city. I have been a lifelong surfer and cannot express  to you the amount of joy the sport of surfing has brought my family and I.  In the past year or two the sport has grown  rapidly. The wave pool technology has grown as well. The technology and final product is astonishing. You used to have  to jump on a plane and fly across the world with the hopes of getting waves of this caliber. When the world saw the first  wave generated by this technology the internet exploded, time stopped and everyone felt that the future had arrived. La  Quinta is the perfect spot for the Coral Mountain Wave Project! Recently our family got to go out to the wonderful city  of La Quinta. WOW! What a place. The leadership here has done a wonderful job with their vision, purpose and city  management. Great job! We were blown away by the amazing desert landscape, pristine golf courses, friendly locals and  great restaurants. We cannot wait to go back with golf clubs and pray that we have surfboards on the roof of our car!   ‐ Jon Arman   1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 6:34 AM To:Justin Ayre; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Voicing my support for Coral Mountain Wave Project Mr. Ayre,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Justin Ayre <justinjayre@gmail.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 7:15 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Voicing my support for Coral Mountain Wave Project   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council   As an occasional visitor to La Quinta with my family (wife and 3 kids ages 1, 6 and 9), I am very excited about the  opportunity to spend more time in La Quinta once Coral Mountain is complete.   After visiting The Surf Ranch in Lemoore and other destinations around the world that attract similar clientele, I believe  this project will bring a welcome demographic to La Quinta.  This project will attract people who care about the local  community, the environment and want to spend time enjoying the outdoor lifestyle that La Quinta offers.     Given the vision for the project and surrounding residences (and its price point), the project will not bring the nuisance  that some residents have raised concerns about.  It will bring people capable of spending time and money in and around  the community.    I am aware of the various challenges raised by local residents, but strongly believe they will be pleasantly surprised by  having Coral Mountain in the community.  I strongly support this project.  Best regards,  Justin  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:27 AM To:Tony Bouza; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro; City Clerk Mail Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Bouza,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Tony Bouza <tonybouza@fhrpartners.com>  Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 6:27 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear Honorable Members of the La Quinta City Council:  As local residents, we are writing to voice our support for the Coral Mountain project.  After monitoring project  discussions and presentations at the recent Planning Commission hearings and reviewing the voluminous environmental  documents, we are pleased to support this project because we believe it will benefit our community.  The opponents have voiced complaints about its impact on water use, lighting and traffic. However, the city’s own  studies, the environmental review and the developer’s information persuade us that those objections are overstated  and unreasonable, especially compared to other likely uses for the site.  For example, the project is already approved for  a golf course, which would consume much more water than the proposed wave basin.  The lighting and traffic issues  have also been fully and satisfactorily addressed by the developer and are not materially different than the impacts of a  different project.  The advantages of Coral Mountain are numerous, including the tax revenue it will generate for La  Quinta and site improvements that will benefit the surrounding areas.  Plus, it will be a unique attraction for the area.  Please do not veto this project!  People fear change, but change is necessary and inevitable.  The change that will result  from the Coral Mountain project will be much better, and will result in more benefits, than the change that is likely to  result from another golf course or some other project on the site.    We respectfully urge you to approve Coral Mountain.  2    Tony & Cynthia Bouza  77345 Loma Vista  La Quinta, CA  92253  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 4:53 PM To:Monika Radeva Subject:Fw: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Monika,  Per Bill's indication to Mr. Caskey below, please include his email in the comments for the project.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Ihrke, Bill <bihrke@rutan.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 4:15 PM  To: johnc@donwilsonbuilders.com <johnc@donwilsonbuilders.com>  Cc: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; Ihrke, Bill <bihrke@rutan.com>  Subject: RE: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Good Afternoon Mr. Caskey,  Our office serves as the contract City Attorney’s Office for the City of La Quinta.  Your email (below) was forwarded to  me in my capacity as the La Quinta City Attorney, with a specific request to notify you—as the Council would do with any  interested person in a project involving the La Quinta City Council’s exercise of its legislative powers over land use  decisions—that Council strictly adheres to following applicable federal, state, and local laws regarding the consideration,  approval, or denial of any project.  The Coral Mountain project will be treated no differently when the Council considers  the land use applications and related environmental review documents at the upcoming public hearing on June 7, 2022.   While your comments, like any other comments for or against a project that are received from residents, business  owners, interested parties, and the general public, are very much appreciated and will be included in the administrative  record, it must be noted that the Council—as it always does—will make a decision relating to the Coral Mountain project  based on its overall benefits to the City as a whole and within the confines of the law, and will not be based on  expectations of investors.  The Council, legally, must avoid not only actual financial conflicts of interest, but also the  appearance of financial conflicts of interest, including the making of a decision based on the expectation of payment for  any decision.    While I understand that your communication ultimately is to voice support for the project, which you have a  constitutional and statutory right to submit, our office and the City Manager prefer to make sure that (a) the record is  clear, (b) the process is transparent, and (c) all decisions are made according to law.  Thank you for your attention to this e‐mail.  As noted above, your communication and support for the project will be  noted in the record.   2 Sincerely,  Bill Ihrke  La Quinta City Attorney  William H. Ihrke 18575 Jamboree Road, 9th Floor | Irvine, CA 92612 O. (714) 641-5100 | D. (714) 338-1863 bihrke@rutan.com | www.rutan.com _____________________________________________________  Privileged And Confidential Communication.  This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a) are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act  (18 USC §§ 2510‐2521), (b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information, and (c) are for the sole use of the  intended recipient named above. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the  electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of the information received in error is strictly  prohibited.  From: John Caskey <johnc@donwilsonbuilders.com>  Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 10:55 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear members of city of La Quinta City Council and staff,  Don Wilson Builders has been an owner of residences in the desert area for over 50 years. The company was  founded by Don and Elinor Wilson in 1955 and the properties were used primarily as their own escapes for  long weekends. Over the last twenty five years, the main property (47096 El Menara Circle, Palm Desert) has  been used by the company employees as they sign up months in advance for their weekend away with their  families and friends (and take the company gas card with them).  I am one of the investors in Coral Mountain and I think it would be a great addition to the area. The  development would provide new and interesting experiences for members of the community as well as to  visitors making their way to the desert just for the weekend.  I can tell you that our employees, many with  young families, are excited about this project. Also, as a real estate developer, I know that this project will be  planned and designed with the highest professionalism based on the information I have received as well as  participating in various meetings with the principals of the project. I have surfed at the same wave pool in  Lemoore that this wave pool is designed after and it will be incredible. I know many of the other investors and  they are concerned more about the quality and beauty of the project than simply just having a wave to ride  (they can do this anywhere in the world). For many, including myself, it is more about coming back years later  and seeing a project that we can all be proud of.  I strongly support this project and hope you will too.  3    Thanks for your time and consideration.     John       John Caskey  President  Don Wilson Builders  23705 Crenshaw Blvd., Suite 200  Torrance, CA 90505     Office 310‐539‐9902  Fax      310‐539‐2876   Cell      714‐308‐2700       johnc@donwilsonbuilders.com         Irvine Office  2020 Main Street, Suite 1180  Irvine, CA  92614  Office 949‐428‐0260  Fax 949‐428‐0264               1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 6:33 AM To:Jito Chadha; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Chadha,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Jito Chadha <jitochadha@gmail.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 5:55 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  City of La Quinta,   I'm an avid surfer, pastime visitor to the city of La Quinta and visitor to the Kelly Slater Surf Ranch.  My excitement for  the Coral Mountain resort is unlike any other development I've anticipated.  If Coral Mountain is approved and built as  would be planned I would definity make many trips per year to stay in the CM hotel to surf and do many other amazing  activities.  Additionally, I would explore other parts of the city of La Quinta and give them my business.    My excitement for the possibility of surfing in a corner pocket of the City of La Quinta at the Coral Mountain resort is  beyond my expectations even as someone who has traveled to most of the best surf and resort destinations in the  world.  The proposed surfing wave will definitely be one of the top surfing waves in the world in terms of the wave  quality.  I also understand the use of water for the project is many orders of magnitude less than would be needed for a  golf course of similar size and think it is important to give this team a chance to show how we can enjoy the land without  depleting natural resources but rather working with the earth for sustainable long‐term enjoyment that improves our  lives and our future.  Sincerely,   Jito Chadha  ‐‐   2 Jito Chadha  (310) 487‐7038  1 From:Goldman LP <goldmanlp007@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 2:23 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:I Support Coral Mountain! ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I believe it’s imperative for the City and Community of La Quinta to go ahead and let the Coral Mountain Resort be approved and completed not only will it be great for the environment yet for the community and the people of La Quinta and the Coachella Valley as a whole “ physically mentally spiritually emotionally and financially and environmentally for all the people and the native habitat as well. Thank you. Sincerely, Frank Chenault GSS LLC 831 585 8498 1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 11:52 AM To:come chantrel; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Chantrel,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: come chantrel <cchantrel@gmail.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 11:11 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Good morning,  My name is Come Chantrel, I am married and we have a six year old son.  Our family strongly supports Coral Mountain.  As a lifelong surfer, I travelled the world but I've never been to La Quinta or Palm Springs.  On the other hand, I had the  opportunity to visit the Surf Ranch in Lemoore and it was a pleasure to leave my ocean view Malibu home and fight  traffic for hours to get there.  To begin with, The Surf Ranch has the ability to artificially create some of the best waves I've ever surfed in California, if  not THE best.  Secondly, the idea that the surf is guaranteed is revolutionary.  I've traveled to very far places, only to get "skunked" (not  encounter any surf during the trip).  Third, conceptually, Coral Mountain is the future.  The best analogy I could find for anyone who doesn't surf is the ski  industry.  Imagine a lifetime of skiing, ungroomed, very crowded, sometimes polluted slopes that you reached after very lengthy  travelling and where the snow is absolutely not guaranteed.   To this, add a ski station without any kind of lift , where  you'd spend the day climbing by foot for a couple of rides down.  Neither your wife, nor young kids would be able to tag  along and you would have to leave them in the morning until the end of the day (not a great recipe for a married couple  on vacation).  Now imagine a modern ski resort and apply it to surfing and you have the Coral Mountain's project which I strongly  support and would visit from Malibu every weekend if it was an option.  Thank you very much for your attention.  2 Very Respectfully,    Come Chantrel  1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 11:11 AM To:come chantrel Cc:Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva Subject:Chantrel, Come: I Support Coral Mountain! Good morning, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the project at the 6/7/2022 public hearing and will be included in the public record for the project. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: come chantrel <cchantrel@gmail.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 11:10 AM  To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: I Support Coral Mountain!  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  My name is Come Chantrel, I am married and we have a six year old son.  Our family strongly supports Coral Mountain.  As a lifelong surfer, I travelled the world but I've never been to La Quinta or Palm Springs.  On the other hand, I had the  opportunity to visit the Surf Ranch in Lemoore and it was a pleasure to leave my ocean view Malibu home and fight  traffic for hours to get there.  To begin with, The Surf Ranch has the ability to artificially create some of the best waves I've ever surfed in California, if  not THE best.  Secondly, the idea that the surf is guaranteed is revolutionary.  I've traveled to very far places, only to get "skunked" (not  encounter any surf during the trip).  Third, conceptually, Coral Mountain is the future.  The best analogy I could find for anyone who doesn't surf is the ski  industry.  Imagine a lifetime of skiing, ungroomed, very crowded, sometimes polluted slopes that you reached after very lengthy  travelling and where the snow is absolutely not guaranteed.   To this, add a ski station without any kind of lift , where  you'd spend the day climbing by foot for a couple of rides down.  Neither your wife, nor young kids would be able to tag  along and you would have to leave them in the morning until the end of the day (not a great recipe for a married couple  on vacation).  Now imagine a modern ski resort and apply it to surfing and you have the Coral Mountain's project which I strongly  support and would visit from Malibu every weekend if it was an option.  Thank you very much for your attention.  Very Respectfully,  Come Chantrel  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 7:54 AM To:Chertavian, Gerald; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Chertavian,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Chertavian, Gerald <gchertavian@YearUp.org>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 10:50 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council members, It is my understanding that the Coral Mountain Wave Project will be considered by the La  Quinta City Council this Tuesday, June 7.  Thank you for considering this and please know that  bringing this project to La Quinta would create a strong incentive to visit your fine city.  The  project meets a real need in the growing surf community and I believe that it would be a  significant source of economic development for your region. Many kind regards and thank you again, Gerald Gerald Chertavian  Founder and CEO  Pronouns: he, him, his  Year Up  45 Milk Street,9th floor  Boston, MA 02109  w: 857-305-9900  2 c: 617-515-8203  Assistant: Rhonda Tanner  rtanner02@yearup.org  857-770-2742  http://www.yearup.org  http://www.youtube.com/yearupinc     *Please know that I encourage and respect boundaries around personal time off and caretaking. Should you receive communications from me during a time when you’re engaging in either, please protect your time and respond when you are working.*     1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:07 PM To:Courson, Mike; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Courson,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Courson, Mike <Mike.Courson@nmrk.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:28 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Members of City Council,  Although I have zero skin in the game related to this project, I’d like  to voice my full support! It’s refreshing to see such  a unique and creative development purposed rather than another golf course. I reside in northern California and rarely  make it to the Palm Springs area, generally due to not being a golfer. Should this project be approved, I’ll be counting  the days to visit!   Thank You,  Mike  Mike Courson  NOTICE: This e‐mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may  contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the  intended recipient, you are not permitted to read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, use or take any action in reliance  upon this message and any attachments, and we request that you promptly notify the sender and immediately delete  this message and any attachments as well as any copies thereof. Delivery of this message to an unintended recipient is  not intended to waive any right or privilege. Newmark is neither qualified nor authorized to give legal or tax advice, and  any such advice should be obtained from an appropriate, qualified professional advisor of your own choosing.  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 1:33 PM To:Clay DellaCava; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. DellaCava,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Clay DellaCava <clay@ljde.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 12:09 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hello,  My name is Clay DellaCava and I am in full support of the Coral Mountain development.  My wife and I come to the Palm  Springs and the La Quinta area several times a year and we enjoy outdoor activities but not so much Golf.  We enjoy  water sports, riding bikes and skateboards etc.  Mind you my wife is 42 and I’m 52.  I am an avid wake surfer here in  Colorado and am very interested in the wave here at Coral.  I’ve been to the California wave once and it was something I  couldn’t imagine, just amazing.  My wife wants to learn how to surf and this would be the perfect avenue for her.  We  have thought of owning a home in this area and this development would be perfect for us and our 9 year old as a second  home.  Please accept this development as it’s the “wave” of the future, no pun intended.  :  )  Clay DellaCava   1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 12:38 PM To:Ian; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. deQueiroz,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Ian <manawolf1@gmail.com>  Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 12:26 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hello La Quinta:   I wanted to write to express my support for Coral Mountain.   I have been following the project closely as both my mother and two of my uncles live in the Palm Springs area. I have  come to believe that this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to bring the type of development that fundamentally shifts  the future potential of the area. After visiting the area many times I believe we are on an important crossroad. In order  to protect the area's appeal to high networth residents and attract further investment from Los Angeles and beyond,  Coral Mountain is a very important opportunity to signal Southern California that Coachella valley is an enduring and  forward thinking community in which the opportunity for growth is unparalleled.  On behalf of my whole family, we support Coral Mountain moving forward and look forward to enjoying the many  attractions envisioned by the project.  Thank you for your consideration.  Ian deQueiroz  707‐339‐1794  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 6:33 AM To:DDD; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Durkin,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: DDD <douglas@durkindesign.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 5:26 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council Members:  I am writing in  support of the new Coral Mountain Wave Project and community.  I am an interior designer in the Bay Area, and have come to the Desert for many years, and have executed a number of  projects there.  I have spent some time in La Quinta, and am very fond of its natural beauty, and all  of what La Quinta  has to offer  As a golfer, I have also appreciated the myriad of choices that the Desert has to offer regarding this sport.    What I think  is so great about Coral Mountain is that it will be a destination, though with a completely different activity than golf as  its central theme.   Having seen the beautiful and sensitive plans and concepts for the property, it seems to me that this  would be a welcome addition to the valley.   Not only for the hospitality aspect, but the beautiful residential concept as  well.    I believe given the professionalism of this  particular  development team,  and the spirit and intent behind this endeavor,  that the Coral Mountain Wave project would be a beautiful , successful, and venerated addition to what La Quinta has to  offer.  Given the current discussion of planned wave developments in the Desert, I also believe it would be the gold  standard that all would be compared to.    Thank you  2    Sincerely,     Douglas J. Durkin       DOUGLASDURKINDESIGN     Douglas Durkin  douglas@durkindesign.com  39 Arkansas Street, San Francisco, CA 94107  P 415.255.0540     durkindesign.com        1 From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:10 PM  To: Matt Ginella <mattginella@gmail.com>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi  <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve  Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   Mr. Ginella,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Matt Ginella <mattginella@gmail.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:15 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To whom it may concern,   As someone who has made several trips to La Quinta, the concept of Coral Mountain would be yet another reason to  come back on a regular basis. Not just for me, but also for my family and friends. As a journalist covering the  development of golf all over the world, I've always felt Palm Springs could use a face‐lift of sorts. Something to reset the  narrative to not only celebrating its storied past, but to set it up for what will be the future. Projects like Coral Mountain  do just that. I hope local leaders can also see the need for a more diverse and youthful clientele.  Matt Ginella  CEO, Fire Pit Collective  Oceanside, CA  92130  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 10:01 AM To:Kent Goldman; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:City Clerk Mail Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Goldman,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Kent Goldman <kent@upsidevc.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 9:53 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Members of the City Council‐   I am writing to express my support for the Coral Mountain project. I live in the Bay Area and have never visited the La  Quinta area. Coral Mountain would change that and I would expect to visit a few times a year.  I am a very active father of three ‐ children ages 10, 8, and 5. My wife, my children, and myself love the outdoors and  love vigorous exercise. We are active skiers, mountain bikers, hikers, and surfers (of varying intensity). But, like many of  our generation, we are not golfers nor do we have more than a gentle interest in tennis. As much as we have been  drawn to the climate of La Quinta, when working through a potential trip, we have always abandoned our plans when  we found ourselves asking "what would be the core of our visit?" When I first heard about Coral Mountain, I instantly  knew it could become the driving force and interest of our visit.   I love the idea of being in one place where each of us can have "guaranteed" conditions which would suit each of our  surfing abilities. One of the challenges we have when planning family beach trips, is finding a break which is challenging  enough to be interesting to the better surfers in our group while also being near a break which encourages beginners  and intermediates to learn & progress. I'm thrilled by the notion that this ideal "surf break" could also be near mountain  biking, hiking, and warm, dry weather.   I've daydreamed of future family trips to La Quinta and Coral Mountain. I hope this note encourages your support of  these possibilities.   2   Please note, I do not have a financial interest in the development of this project ‐ I just want to plan a great vacation  that the whole family will love!    Many thanks‐  Kent    Kent Goldman | Upside Partnership  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:27 AM To:Jeff Gordon; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Gordon,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Jeff Gordon <jg_24k@jgiracing.com>  Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 7:08 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To Whom it May Concern,  I hope this email finds you well. I am writing you to express my full support of the Coral Mountain Wave Project in La  Quinta.  As someone who has taken my family on many world class trips and recently visited the Surf Ranch, Kelly Slater’s first  wave pool in Lemoore, CA, I can tell you unequivocally it was one of the most professionally run and best family  experiences we have had the pleasure to be a part of. I’m certain it would add tremendous value to the La Quinta  community if this project were approved not to mention the endless visits from me and my family.  Thank you for your consideration.  Jeff Gordon  Vice Chairman  Hendrick Motorsports  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 6:35 AM To:Matt Gray; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Gray,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Matt Gray <matt.gds@gmail.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 9:16 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To Whom It May Concern,  I am writing this letter in order to voice my unequivocal support for  the Coral Mountain Wave Project.  As a long‐time resident of southern California, I have visited the La  Quinta area many times with family and friends ‐ forming many  cherished memories in the process. It is because of this that I am  writing this letter. I hope for the Coral Mountain Wave Project to be  approved so that we may form new memories around what I know will  become an unforgettable experience.  I have visited the Kelly Slater Surf Ranch in King's County, so I know  what experiences the wave pool technology is capable of. I have also  reviewed the project plans of the entire development, and I find it to  be perfect for friends and family of all ages and interests.  Furthermore, I have spoken with many fellow residents of Los Angeles  about the wave pool project. Everyone I have spoken with is in  agreement that if a wave pool was to be built in La Quinta they would  2 visit the city several times per year. They would bring their friends  and families with them. They would book holidays and special occasions  in La Quinta. In short, La Quinta would become a major focal and  destination point for them. It is because of this that I believe the  Coral Mountain Wave Project will become a magnet bringing people of  all ages to La Quinta.    I have eagerly awaited the continued development of this project, and  I very much hope to visit La Quinta soon in order to book a stay at  the Coral Mountain Wave Project. I give this project my full support.    If I can answer any questions or give any further details, please do  not hesitate to reach out directly to me. Thank you.    Regards,    Matthew Gray  Staff Engineer @ Coinbase  310‐439‐8497  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 9:14 AM To:Chris Grow; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Expressing my Support and Thanks. Mr. Grow,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Chris Grow <chrisgrowonthecoast@gmail.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 9:03 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Expressing my Support and Thanks.   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council and Staff of La Quinta, California,    I'm writing to express my gratitude to each of you for your upcoming consideration of project approval for Coral  Mountain, as championed by Michael Schwab and his partners at Meriwether.   My relationship to both Michael's work and his team's work began six years ago, three years after Michael's original  investment in the Kelly Slater Wave Company.   Over these last six years I've witnessed how Michael's efforts can enhance the lives of those who attend the projects he  has funded, as well as the communities in which his projects are built and continue to operate today.  Through my work in the surfing industry at Kelly Slater's 'Firewire Surfboards' I have been fortunate to witness the way  that Wave Pools can create beacons of wellness and enthusiasm for the outdoors.   I'm most specifically mindful of the ability that projects like Coral Mountain have to bring families and communities  together around enhancing life experiences that only a decade ago were entirely unimaginable, before Michael and his  partners crafted a vision that very literally turned nothing into something. It was only six years ago that the general  population was entirely unaware of our potential to ride waves outside of the ocean, and today La Quinta has the  2 opportunity to seed Coral Mountain as the first community of its kind, centered around this deeply compelling  innovation.  As a close neighbor of La Quinta in San Diego California, I'm confident that Coral Mountain will be a steward for the  values of La Quinta while creating a beacon of wellness, outdoor sports and surfing, amidst a community of individuals  who will enrich and enhance the textured fabric of La Quinta's already enviable community. Personally, I hope to be a  part of this up‐and‐coming community as a home owner and member at Coral Mountain with both my immediate and  extended family.   As a former land developer myself I'm deeply familiar with the kind of service and commitment that each of your roles  within the City Council entails, and I'm thankful for your ongoing consideration of this exciting project for La Quinta.   With extensive thanks and best wishes for a productive dialogue this coming Tuesday the 7th,   Chris Grow  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 3:06 PM To:David Henry; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Attachments:Coral Mountain.docx Mr. Henry,  Thank you for the attached comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the  application at hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: David Henry <davidhenryart@hotmail.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:36 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Please find the attached letter in reference to the Coral Mountain proposal.      D  A  V  I  D      H  E  N  R  Y  1484 E. GEM CIRCLE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 (404) 876 2007 Dear Members of the La Quinta City Council, I am a designer living in Palm Springs. I have a degree in Architecture from Georgia Tech and a Masters of Visual Arts degree from Georgia State University. I taught interior design at the American Intercontinental University and for about 30 years I have been working as a designer creating homes for a wide variety of clients. I have studied the proposal for Coral Mountain and find it to be outstanding. The concept is unique and I believe it would be of great benefit to the city of La Quinta both aesthetically and economically. I would encourage my design clients to rent homes in the development while I am working on their homes. I would personally enjoy the wave park. Surfing in the desert is such a wonderful idea. I encourage the city council to approve this development. I think it will attract people to live in La Quinta and will bring jobs and enhance the city for all. Regards, David Henry 1 From:Scott Hudgins <scott@hudginsdesign.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 8:37 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Coral Mountain Support Letter ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Clerk,  Since I am unable to attend the City Council meeting on June 7, 2022, I'd like to write with a letter of support  for the Coral Mountain Development in the City of La Quinta.   For the last 11 years, I've been fortunate to visit La Quinta on business trips and fell in love with the city, the  landscape and the architecture.   With a passion for desert architecture, I have always wanted to open an  office in the Coachella Valley but I could never get the full family support from my wife and daughters.  With  the Coral Mountain development I would invest and live in the community and my family and friends would  spend a significant amount of time there, including birthdays and holidays.  I'm extremely excited about this  development and feel it's going to be an incredibly special place and one that truly compliments and stands  out amongst the golf communities, polo club and other nearby developments.    From my own architectural perspective, this development cares more about the environment and place than  anything I've seen in the Coachella Valley.  The pure aesthetic, use natural materials and strong relationship to  the landscape will create a timeless development that will thrive for years to come.  You have my full support and would be grateful for your approval of this development.  Kind Regards,  Scott  __________________________________  scott hudgins, aia  hudgins design group, inc.   1107 south coast hwy  laguna beach   ca   92651  hudginsdesign.com  949.322.7922  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 4:58 PM To:Monika Radeva Subject:Fw: Voicing my support for the Coral Mountain Wave Project Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 4:57 PM  To: Britt Joyce <britt@regattainvest.com>  Subject: Re: Voicing my support for the Coral Mountain Wave Project   Mr. Joyce,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Britt Joyce <britt@regattainvest.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 4:03 PM  Subject: Voicing my support for the Coral Mountain Wave Project   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council Member,  I’m writing to voice my enthusiasm and support for the Coral Mountain Wave Project.    I live a couple hours away in Manhattan Beach, where I am raising my young family.  I plan to buy us a vacation home in  the proposed Coral Mountain development.    I have toured the property which is absolutely beautiful as you know.  I have also spent two days surfing in the other  wave basin that uses the Kelly Slater Wave Co technology up in Lemoore, CA and had an absolute blast.  I can’t think of a  better setting to go with my wife and two little surfing daughters!    As a likely future home owner in La Quinta, I really hope you will support the project.  Thanks for your consideration!  2    Britt Joyce, CFA, CFP®  Managing Partner & Financial Advisor  Co‐Chief Investment Officer & Director of Endowments & Foundations     REGATTA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC  880 Apollo St., Ste 129  El Segundo, CA 90245  Office: 310‐725‐9102   Fx:  310‐725‐9158  Britt@regattainvest.com  www.regattainvest.com           Make deposit checks payable to “Fidelity Investments”.  Include account # on the check and mail to: Fidelity  Investments, P.O. Box 770002, Cincinnati, OH 45277‐0077     Placing Trades:  We cannot accept asynchronous communication (i.e., email, fax or voicemail) when receiving trade  orders.  Orders should be placed and confirmed directly with Britt, Spencer, Russell or Nick.  This industry standard is  designed to provide best execution for time and price sensitive trades.      If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately, do not forward it, and  delete the message and any attachments. Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this message or any  attachments by an individual or entity other than the intended recipient is prohibited.     1 From:Davin Kazama <dkazama@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 12:22 PM To:Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Consulting Planner; Danny Castro; City Clerk Mail Subject:Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Aloha,  My name is Davin Kazama, and I stand in strong support of the Coral Mountain Project in La Quinta.  As someone who was born and raised in the Hawaiian Islands, I have seen the benefits of surfing first‐hand.  I’ve always felt that watersports are a great equalizer. Surfing doesn’t require its competitors to be genetically blessed  with superior height, speed, or strength. While these attributes obviously help, wave knowledge and skill bred through  passion and perseverance are more critical to success.  What a great lesson for athletes of all ages, shapes, and sizes to  know that no matter where they begin, they can achieve their dreams through hard work!  Personally, I've seen my teenage daughter's self‐confidence and positive mental health skyrocket because of surfing.  After trying numerous mainstream sports, she found surfing and with her low center of gravity has been thriving ever  since. We visited the Surf Ranch in Lemoore, CA, and absolutely fell in love with the wave, technology, and especially the  Aloha shown by Kelly Slater Wave Company staff.  I am sure they will bring the same smiles, handshakes, and hugs to La  Quinta.  Yes, there was so much love and warmth that we experienced in Lemoore, and I'm excited to see it extend to La Quinta.  To me, this project is as much about mental health, love, and Aloha as it is about surfing. Coral Mountain will brighten  your day, improve physical/mental health, and keep the smiles/positivity flowing. We already have perfect waves in  Hawaii, but rest assured that I will be one of the first ones signing up to purchase a home!  I stand in strong support and urge you to approve of the Coral Mountain Project. Thank you for the opportunity to  provide my thoughts.  Aloha,  Davin  Davin Kazama  email: dkazama@gmail.com  |  Phone: 808.222.3283  |  Fax: 808.356.0756   Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may  contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the  intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, forwarding or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If  2 you believe that you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by reply e‐mail, and delete  the original message.  Thank you.  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 9:15 AM To:Deborah Kent-Clark; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Kent‐Clark,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Deborah Kent‐Clark <debkentclark@gmail.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 8:41 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hello,  I am a frequent visitor to La Quinta to visit friends who live there, as well as attend Coachella (8 years now!) and Indian  Wells Tennis.  Coral Mountain seems to me to be an excellent addition to the area to not only provide residents with a fantastic new,  exciting place to surf (in the desert!), do sports, participate in wellness activities and have fun. It will bring new people  into the desert who have never been before.  I’ve told my friends who live in La Quinta about this venture and they are excited about the possibilities. You will most  likely hear positive support from them as well.  There is nothing like this resort so its uniqueness will help La Quinta stand out as a "must go‐to destination" in Southern  California. I can’t wait to experience Coral Mountain myself.  Thank you for reading and for your support.  2 Deborah Kent‐Clark  818‐636‐1900  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 7:56 AM To:Sid Landolt; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Landolt,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Sid Landolt <sid@ngpropertiesinc.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 5:55 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Good evening,  This email is being sent in support of the proposed Coral Mountain project. I am a long time visitor and advocate of the La Quinta area and know personally the integrity of the people at Meriwether Companies. Simply put, “they care” and will be great stewards of any community they create/develop.   I fundamentally believe that this kind of recreational facility/community is the future given our ever dwindling resources and the need to continue to protect our environment. On the land and in the water.   Decisions and support for these types of communities is never easy. Hopefully a little more comforting knowing the quality of the people behind this proposal.   My best,  Sid Sid Landolt  President  New Generation Properties Inc.  T. 604-644-1655 Note my new email address: sid@ngpropertiesinc.com  1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 10:15 AM To:David Leff Cc:E A; Laurie McGinley; Consulting Planner; Monika Radeva Subject:Leff, David: Coral Mtn Resort - Support, Public Hearing on June 7 Good morning Mr. Leff, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the project at the 6/7/2022 public hearing and will be included in the public record for the project. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: Katrin Bolton <kbolton@ezralow.com> On Behalf Of David Leff  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 9:25 AM  To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: E A <ea@ezralow.com>; David Leff <DLeff@ezralow.com>  Subject: Public Hearing on June 7  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To Whom It May Concern:  In reference to your Notice for the upcoming Public Hearing on June 7th and as the owner of the adjacent property  mentioned, I would like to inform you that I am in favor of this development. It adds to the attraction and economy of La  Quinta and the surrounding areas.  It is also a unique use that is not a golf course, for a change.  Sincerely,  David Leff  Principal  The Ezralow Company  23622 Calabasas Road, Suite 200  Calabasas, CA 91302  (818)223‐3535 1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:08 PM To:Rob Leff; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Leff,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Rob Leff <rob@ltdevelopment.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:44 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To Whom it may concern.  We are very excited to see this Coral Project taking one more step toward full approval.   We feel that having a unique  development that isn’t just another golf course will be a huge asset to the area.  We hope to be enjoying this new amenity sometime soon  Thank You  Rob  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:25 AM To:Belair Vista; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Jenny,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Belair Vista <belair.vista@gmail.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:25 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To the City Council of La Quinta,  I am emailing you in favor of moving forward with Coral Mountain. I have been informed of the plans for this project and  this is everything anyone could want and more! A luxury resort in the desert, with a wave pool, a wellness center,  endless activities, and something for everyone, this is going to be a game changer! Not only will this enrich the lives of  those who are fortunate enough to experience Coral Mountain, but can you imagine how much revenue and attraction  it’ll bring to La Quinta (not just the city, but every resident should be in favor because it’ll benefit their home’s value,  etc). I am completely in favor of building this project.  Thank you,  Jenny M.  Bel Air Vista  1 From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:07 PM  To: Andrew Mackenzie <amackenzie@aetherfilms.com>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi  <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve  Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   Mr. Mckenzie,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Andrew Mackenzie <amackenzie@aetherfilms.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:08 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To the Leaders of the La Quinta Community,   My name is Andrew Mackenzie and I currently live in Los Angeles. I wanted to reach out to express my support for the  Coral Mountain Project. As an avid surfer, a project like this is incredibly exciting and I couldn't be more confident in the  Coral Mountain team in executing their vision. Assuming this project gets approved and built, I have already  committed to purchasing a lot on the property and look forward to visiting. I also have spoken with a number of other  investors who have said the same. I think this project presents an exciting opportunity for your already great community  and I hope it gets approved and built.   Regards,   Andrew  Andrew Mackenzie   Co‐Founder and Director   amackenzie@aetherfilms.com  (650)‐804‐6542  www.aetherfilms.com  1 From:Logan Malouf <logan.malouf@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 10:58 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:I Support Coral Mountain! Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Hello - My wife’s family owns two residences in La Quinta and we are in full support of the Coral Mountain project. Job creation. Net new tourism from people who aren’t necessarily golf or tennis focused. Currently undeveloped land in a place that won’t interfere with any existing businesses. This is a no brainer. Please approve the project to move forward Thank you Logan Malouf 1 From:Cory Martin <corymartin79@mac.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 9:25 AM To:Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Consulting Planner; Danny Castro; City Clerk Mail Subject:Support for Coral Mountain Wave Project ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council Members,   As a newer resident to La Quinta—I moved here in 2020—I am excited about the future of the city and I wanted to voice  my opinion in favor of the Coral Mountain resort.   I am 42 years old. My fiancé and I bought our first house here and part of the reason we chose La Quinta was the fact  that there were so many new things in the works for the city, including the Coral Mountain Resort. He grew up in  Hawaii, and I grew up in the midwest. We met in Venice Beach and the prospect of the resort, housing development and  wave basin gave the city a definite edge over the rest of the Coachella Valley.   We both enjoy outdoor sports ‐ surfing, rock climbing, yoga, hiking. Yes, we golf, but we love the idea of there being  other options for people like us who've moved here looking for a better quality of life at a more relaxed pace. Nothing  says a love of the outdoors and a relaxed pace of life more to me than a space to enjoy everything the ocean and beach  have to offer with Coral Mountain and La Quinta as the backdrop to it all.   As a full time resident, I would be very disappointed if the development was not allowed to go through.   I’ve looked at the research and planning that has been done on the project and I am impressed. I don’t see how it will  truly negatively impact the area any more than another development that might go in its place. I live at 54th and  Madison. I am not worried about traffic or other impacts. I think it would be amazing to be able to bike over to Coral  Mountain and enjoy the facilities. The prospective restaurants and markets that will also be developed on the grounds  sound amazing. We would love to have healthy places to eat and shop nearby. I also know that much of the  development will be private residential and we’re both trying to further our careers so that we can afford to live in the  development once it’s complete. We love our current home but the idea of living in a community like Coral Mountain  sounds like our dream.   I hope the city takes into account its younger residents who will be shaping the future of La Quinta as I truly believe this  is a great opportunity to provide access to more options for all residents.  I’m happy to talk further or answer any questions you may have ‐  Best,  Cory Martin  81630 Haflinger Way  La Quinta, CA 92253  213‐400‐3291  1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Saturday, June 4, 2022 3:50 PM To:Thomas McDaniel Cc:Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner Subject:McDaniel, Thomas: Coral Mountain Resort - Support Good afternoon Mr. McDaniel, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the project at the 6/7/2022 hearing and will be included in the public record for the project. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov -----Original Message----- From: Thomas McDaniel <tr.ranch@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2022 9:06 AM To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Resort ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** La Quinta City Council My name is Tom McDaniel. Our La Quinta home is located in PGA West at 56-405 Riviera. We have owned our home in PGA West for the past 22 years. We have been full golf and tennis members at PGA West during this time and I have also been a member of The Quarry for the past 10 years. Our home is on the fourth fairway of they Nick Private course. We face the mountains which are illuminated every night for at least 30 years. We and others along this stretch of Riviera consider the illumination a plus and it certainly hasn’t adversely impacted the Big Horn Sheep population since we frequently have a herd of up 30 Big Horn Sheep grazing off our back patio. We are also a couple of hundred yards from Lake Cahuilla and have lived compatibly with the occasional outburst from the Riverside County Law Enforcement Firing Range and the various the sounds associated with marathons and ancillary Coachella and Stage Coach events held at the Park and as well as the American Express golf tournament and concerts. We don’t find the sounds from these events excessive or detracting from our desert home experience. Why support a wave pool as part of the Coral Mountain Resort? Our main home is in Huntington Beach, AKA Surf City USA, where my wife and I have lived for over forty years . 2 The family has now grown to 10. My wife and I, our two married children and four Grandkids. Our family members are all active in golf, tennis and notably surfing. I plan to cover my comments tonight in two sections. First, our reasons for supporting the Coral Mountain Resort project and the second my observations regarding the Environmental Impact Report. Our second and third generation families all see surfing and health/fitness as a desired component of their recreational options. Our son in law is a former professional surfer and remains very active in the surf industry. He currently coaches past US Open surfing champion Courtney Conlogue as well as other up and coming young surfers. He is a key contributor to the California Board Riders Association and founder of the nonprofit Operation Open Water whose mission is to address the physical and mental health challenges of our first responders....military, police and fire through surfing and other ocean/water based programs. Coral Mountain would be a great facility to support this program. He has been to the Kelly Slater wave pool in the Central Valley of California many times as a surfer and coach and is very familiar with its operation. In short, we have a deep knowledge of the surf community and industry. We can attest that the surfing culture of today is health and fitness oriented and multi- generational. The surf business is large and global in scope. The sport has far outgrown early images that were far from flattering. Why is a wave pool of interest to the surfing community?...predictability. In the ocean, waves are unpredictable...sometimes flat and the wait time can be bone chilling and excruciating. Sometimes too big and very dangerous and when conditions are perfect you are competing with many other surfers to catch a single wave. Competitive surf events, such as the US Open of Surfing, may or may not have competitive wave conditions. With the wave pool you have predictability and will always get a great wave to test and perfect your abilities and the wave is all yours!!! It also takes the risk out of hosting competitive surf events. A real plus in the surf and related industry support of surfing events. I have met with the Coral Mountain Project developers on several occasions to get a full review of the project scope. To be clear, I have no financial interest in the project or with the developers. The family has stayed at a resort they developed in Big Sky Montana several times and it is an outstanding development. I am satisfied that their design concept is sound, their diligence comprehensive and professionally done. I truly believe that the private upscale nature of the Coral Mountain project will be a welcome addition to the community and diversify the type of recreation and lifestyle options beyond a strictly golf oriented environment. I know my family is excited about the multi-generational recreational options that Coral Mountain will bring to La Quinta. Comments on the Environmental Impact Report I have more than 50 years of experience in developing, permitting, constructing and operating energy projects both in the US and internationally. Preparing and gaining approvals of environmental impact reports and mitigation measures was an important element of the many projects developed during my tenure as the CEO of a global developer and operator of all forms of power generation and as a Director of a leading manufacturer and developer of utility scale, commercial and residential solar and energy storage systems. I have reviewed the final Environmental Impact Report for the Coral Mountain Resort development prepared under the direction of the City of La Quinta and assisted/reviewed by many consultants and agencies that are experts in their fields. 3 I found the environmental impact assessment and mitigation measures for the five key impact areas of the Coral Mountain Resort: 1)resort generated light and glare, 2) biological resources, 3)water resources, 4) noise and 5)traffic to be comprehensive, thorough and balanced. I also reviewed the extensive list of comments touching on the key impact areas and the responses to concerns raised by agencies and individuals who reviewed the final EIR.I found the responses from the planning staff to be thoughtful and compelling. The Staff conclusion that the Coral Mountain project with mitigations would be of minimal environmental impact is amply supported by their exhaustive review. The drought in California is a relevant concern. I found the developer’s review of the extensive water conservation efforts designed into the project to be comprehensive and responsive to effective water conservation. Compared to the older developments such as PGA West and Andalusia, Coral Mountain, even with the wave pool will be a model for efficient water usage. If there are water constraints in the future, it would seem logical to first look to older less efficient developments to reduce their wasteful usage. Since I live close to the project, I understand why noise is of particular concern to many. It is relevant and important that the consultants reviewing this area had access to an existing working wave pool at Surf Ranch and could get real time data to populate their models which utilize advanced mapping techniques that take into consideration the character and topography surrounding the Coral Mountain project. The resulting conclusion of this work was that noise levels from the projects operations and event plans were not significant and fall within City regulations, requirements and oversight which I support. I would also like to address another area that is briefly mentioned in the report. The California Energy Commission recently unanimously approved updated Title 24 energy efficiency standards for new homes and commercial buildings. These updated standards will take effect on January 1, 2023. New homes are still required to have roof top solar and now be “energy storage ready” and also include building elements to accommodate new energy efficiency technologies, an area that I am quite familiar with. Similar standards will also apply to commercial buildings including hotels. The Coral Mountain Resort project will be required to meet Title 24 standards. Thus, the project will be one of the most energy and water efficient developments in the area. In summary, I reiterate my support for the Coral Mountain project because it expands the lifestyle choices within the city, the environmental impact with mitigation plans is minimal. It will be a model project with respect to water usage and management, energy efficiency and environmental compatibility. I also believe the economic and lifestyle benefits to La Quinta and its residents will positive and sustainable. The City Planning Commission should vote in favor of the Coral Mountain Project. Respectfully, Tom McDaniel Sent from my iPad 1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 1:09 PM To:Kai McDonald; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Support for Coral Mountain Mr. McDonald,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Kai McDonald <kaimcd@gmail.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 12:07 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Support for Coral Mountain   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Greetings,   My name is Kai McDonald, and my wife Ashley and I are from Malibu, CA. As avid arts, music, wellness and surfing  enthusiasts we love visiting the La Quinta area on short "staycations" and during the many events throughout the year.   We believe that Coral Mountain is an exciting and wholly unique addition to La Quinta and we are especially excited  about the surf basin. The Kelly Slater Wave Co technology seems truly amazing and we would definitely be more drawn  to the area to experience it.   We sincerely hope you approve the development and that we will be surfing Coral Mountain waves alongside you  someday!   Best Regards,  Kai McDonald  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:23 AM To:Carl J Montante III; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Montante, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at hearing. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Carl J Montante III <cmontante@terzodevelopment.com> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 5:07 AM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** To Whom This May Concern, I have never been to La Quinta before, but I have been following the Coral Mountain project closely for the last few years and CANNOT WAIT to visit once this project is complete. The development team is great and I believe this would be a great project. -- Carl J. Montante III | Founder and CEO Terzo Development (716) 998-3512 1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 3:58 PM To:Scott Moore Cc:Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner Subject:Moore, Scott: Coral Mountain Wave Project - City Council Meeting Good afternoon, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the project at the 6/7/2022 public hearing and will be included in the public record for the project. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: Scott Moore <scott.moore@atirestoration.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 2:56 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ City Council Meeting  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council,   I just wanted to thank you for all of the due diligence that has been conducted for the Coral Mountain project. I am very hopeful that this project will be underway sometime this year. I truly believe this project will have a very positive long lasting impact on the community of La Quinta. I am an investor and future homeowner at the resort once this project is completed. I can't wait to be able to take my family to this amazing venue and teach my kids, family, friends, clients, etc how to surf one of the most perfect waves in the world. I have had the honor of surfing the Kelly Slater Wave Ranch up north and it's something I will never forget. Having this in our backyard is going to create some long lasting memories.   My family and I are also members and homeowners of The Madison Club. Our house is located at 81422 Peary Place, La Quinta, 92253 which our entire family visits frequently. Having access to some of the best golf resorts and now a surfing resort is a dream come true. I hope this next meeting we can receive some great news with approval to start the creation of this magical surf resort.   Thank you again for your time and consideration for this project. Scott Moore EVP - Operations  O 714-283-9990 x1168   2 C 714-809-7090 E scott.moore@atirestoration.com   ATI Restoration, LLC Essential Service Provider - 24-Hour Response 3360 East La Palma Ave. Anaheim, CA 92806   ATIrestoration.com                          This message originates from the employee of ATI Restoration LLC. identified as the sender and may contain confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are  not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately at 800‐400‐9353, and please delete this message from your system and destroy any hard  copy you may have printed. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. All personal messages express solely the  sender's views and not those of ATI Restoration LLC. This message may not be copied or distributed without this disclaimer.        1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 7:58 AM To:Breene Murphy; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Murphy,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Breene Murphy <breene@carboncollective.co>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 5:29 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hi La Quinta City Council,   I live near you and would love if you allowed Coral Mountain to be developed. I surf a lot, love the desert and there's  nothing like this experience. It's mind alteringly cool and could help differentiate La Quinta from other communities.   Breene Murphy   VP of Strategy and Marketing  Carbon Collective  Check out the Ultimate Guide to Sustainable Investing  ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––  Investment Advisory Services are offered through Carbon Collective Investing LLC, a registered investment adviser. Carbon Collective Investing LLC does not recommend securities except through our automated investing platform.  Please remember that securities cannot be purchased, sold, or traded via  e‐mail or voice message system. This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages  attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged.  2 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read  this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution, or any  action or omission of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received  this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender via email, return  and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving  in any manner.    1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Sunday, June 5, 2022 3:58 PM To:Kevin Murphy; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: In support of the Coral Mountain Project Mr. Murphy,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Kevin Murphy <kmurphy@englemurphy.com>  Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 2:37 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: In support of the Coral Mountain Project   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Honorable Council Members,  As a life long Southern California resident and frequent visitor to La Quinta I want to voice my support for the Coral  Mountain project.  I am not an advocate of development for development sake but I believe this project will be a very unique addition to  the desert experience.  I am lucky that I have not just spent time in the desert but I visited the wave pool in Lemoore with my family. I  emphasize the word family because it was very much a complete family environment. What’s interesting, the wave pool  is often seen just though the lens of surfing but it was so much more. Wether it was the farm to table dinning, the  holistic approach to training and coaching or the clear effort to be environmentally sensitive, it was transformational.  The Coral Mountain project appears to both leverage and expand this focus on health, wellness and sustainability. It  feels like the future of experience based travel.  I believe strongly that Coral Mountain has the potential to redefine La Quinta. Toward that goal, I hope you support the  project moving forward.  Sincerely,  2   Kevin Murphy    324 Arch St.  Laguna Beach Ca. 92651    1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:26 AM To:Leah Lauren; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Nappi,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Leah Lauren <leah.lauren.ny@gmail.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:16 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To the City Council of La Quinta,   I am contacting you on behalf of my support and my family’s support in favor of Coral Mountain! My father, Sam Nappi, has  heavily influenced the world of renewable energy, and my parents have founded a medical facility in New York, as their  mission is to make the world a better place. After my best friend told us about Coral Mountain and what it aims to do, my  family and I strongly believe there should be a Coral Mountain in every area! My family has been trying to find reasons (aside  from business) to visit California more often, but it has become such a hell hole, and having sober family members, it makes it  even more difficult. This is another reason as to why we feel Coral Mountain is a genius idea! Even if people go to La Quinta  and golf, most people are day drinking on the course, and because there is nothing else to do in the area, I understand this,  but this is a big reason as to why we do not visit California anymore. We hope Coral Mountain can come to fruition, because I  promise you, my big, Italian family will 100% come out all of the time, and my dad likes to entertain, so he will definitely bring  in a lot of money and clients, and I’m sure they will all want to buy homes here and compete with one another! I hope this is  the first of many Coral Mountain properties!  Thank you,  Leah Nappi and Family  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 3:06 PM To:Kevin Parra; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Parra,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Kevin Parra <Kevin.Parra@PlazaHomeMortgage.Com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:47 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  There are many reasons that this project should be approved.  I am sure you have heard it from the planning  commission.  It is best in class‐ and as a surfer,  I have surfed several wave pools including the one in Palm Dessert pre  opening.  Golfing is saturated and doesn’t employ as many people as this project will.  It will draw from all of Southern  California and will bring fresh blood and lot’s of money to La Quinta.  This is the future so please make the best decision  for the future of La Quinta.  Thank you for listening.    KEVIN PARRA  Chairman, CEO and President  O  : 858.346.1208 ext 1202 M  : 619.890.8547  D  : 858.346.1202  kevin.parra@plazahomemortgage.com www.plazahomemortgage.com   2   This electronic message contains information from Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. and is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and then please delete the message entirely from your system. Company NMLS # 2113        1 From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:09 PM  To: Garrett Paul <garrettnpaul@gmail.com>  Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project Support   Mr. Paul,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Garrett Paul <garrettnpaul@gmail.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:43 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear Planning Commission,  I’m writing to give my support as a California resident who is an avid surfer and traveler to the development of Coral  Mountain in the La Quinta area.  I have been visiting the Kelly Slater Surf Ranch since it was open to the public and know  what a special place it is, and can only imagine how amazing Coral Mountain will be.  One thing that has stopped me  from going to the Surf Ranch more is the fact that it is not more family friendly.  I have three young girls and a wife who  would be entertained by the Surf Ranch for between 0‐4 hours and then would be looking for something else to do.  If  there was a place like Coral Mountain anywhere within driving distance, I could bring my family for a few days a couple  times a year and it would be a vacation everyone would enjoy.  This feeling is shared by almost all of the friends I visit  Surf Ranch with each year.  Please accept this as a vote of support from all of them as well!  Best,  Garrett Paul  415‐450‐0034  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 6:34 AM To:DANICA PEREZ; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Perez,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: DANICA PEREZ <danica5@me.com>  Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 8:29 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hello City Council,   Introducing myself, Danica Bujic Perez, I currently reside in Malibu California, my younger years I grew up in Rancho  Mirage my uncle had a restaurant there for many years, “The Adriatic" and today my cousin Dodi and her husband Kevin  own “The Nest".  I consider myself somewhat of a local.  I reach out to you all today in support of Coral Mountain!   I”m not a golfer, but I do love water sports and am an avid surfer, I would love to see the Council moving forward in  favor of Coral Mountain.  A new generation of people from all walks of life, looking for water sports, and wellness.   I thank you for your time, and look forward to time spent at Coral Mountain…  Sincerly,  Danica Bujic Perez  1 From:Michael F. Pinto <mpinto@palmierilawgroup.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 1:52 PM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:Erin Naderi; Michael Leifer; Michelle Pase Subject:Written Comments Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Please see below correspondence on behalf on Michael H. Leifer:  Good afternoon:   Our client, MG La Quinta, owns property located at Avenue 58 and Madison at 80505, 58th Avenue.    Based upon the information presented, our client supports the approval of the Coral Mountain Resort project.   Thank you.   /s/ Michael H. Leifer  MHL   1)MG La Quinta 2)Thermal 3)(949) 851‐7388 4)Public Hearing Item 1 5)Support for Coral Mountain Resort Project 6)See above Michael F. Pinto  mpinto@palmierilawgroup.com   2 Park Plaza, Suite 550  Irvine, CA  92614  949‐851‐7351  This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm of Palmieri, Hennessey & Leifer, LLP that may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.   1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 11:22 AM To:Logan Platz.; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Platzer,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Logan Platz. <loganplatzer@gmail.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 11:14 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear La Quinta City Council,         We, Mark Platzer and Logan Platzer give our full support for the building of Coral Mountain Resort. As investors  and people that visit the area known as La Quinta we know that it will bring prosperity, health, and a clip of the  future to the world. It will be an Oasis for all people and a family friendly environment. But it won't just be a  wave pool, it will be a place where the human body can recover, with Coral Mountain's advanced health and  fitness department. That's why we support the up and coming Coral Mountain project.   Sincerely,   Mark Platzer and Logan Platzer  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 2:28 PM To:Schwab-Pomerantz, Carrie; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Pamerantz‐Schwab,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Schwab‐Pomerantz, Carrie <Carrie.Schwab‐Pomerantz@Schwab.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 2:19 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear Councilmembers and Staff,  Thank you so much for considering the approval of the Coral Mountain Wave project.  I can’t imagine a better attraction  for families to visit La Quinta.   A few years back, my entire family: children, nieces and nephews and siblings were lucky  enough to surf the prototype in Lemoore. Because of this experience we all now have the confidence to participate in  this sport, even for those of us almost 60 years old.  In fact, we had so much fun that surfing has become a part of our  family traditions.     But Coral Mountain will offer so much more and will serve as a great compliment to La Quinta’s many attractions.  As  our family continues to grow, I envision Coral Mountain to become our tradition for generations to come.  Sincerely,  Carrie Pomerantz   Carrie Schwab Pomerantz, CFP®  Board Chair and President, Charles Schwab Foundation  Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.  211 Main Street, 16th Floor  2 MS: 211MN-16-207  San Francisco, CA 94105  Tel: 415-667-1800; Fax: 415-667-1801  email: carrie.schwab-pomerantz@schwab.com  Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook       Classification: Schwab Internal  1 From:Marie Radimsky <mradimsky@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 8:58 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Coral Mountain Project ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  I fully support the Coral Mountain project and it certainly would get me (and everyone I know) to visit the Palm  Springs/Palm Desert/LaQuinta area on a regular basis.    ‐‐   Marie Radimsky  415‐971‐1597  mradimsky@gmail.com  1 From:Lee Redmond <lredmond@eastdilsecured.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 10:41 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Coral Mountain ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To whom this may concern,   My name is Lee Redmond, I am minor investor and excited future permanent resident of La Quinta’s Coral Mountain. To  cut to the chase, I plan to move my growing family of five, with 3 small children to Coral Mountain. This is not an  investment property or a vacation home, I plan to open an office in the city and move my young growing family to La  Quinta, as this community is that special! My new office will look to hire 3‐4 employees immediately from the Coachella  valley (or bring in talent if we can’t hire from the existing population base) and hopes of continued expansion.   There has been some concern about noise pollution and light pollution, and I can assure you that I would not be moving  my small family if I didn’t think this community will have the social fabric of a quaint and safe community that fits in line  with the La Quinta community as a whole, in which I can raise my children within.  While I can understand some residents concerns with the unknown, this community will help emphasize what it means  to live in La Quinta in the best way, and is a stark difference between the other “resort style” surf communities popping  up in the valley. This community is of the highest quality and will bring the best elements to the city of La Quinta.   Please push to make our families dream a reality, and I can assure you we will be future advocates of the coming  initiatives that the city needs future support with.      Regards,   Redmond Family  Lee R. Redmond Director 500 Newport Center Drive, Suite 900, Newport Beach, CA 92660 m 949 275 7101 lredmond@eastdilsecured.com CA DRE: 01900420 This message and any attachment are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please do not read, use, copy or  disseminate this message or attachment, or disclose the contents to any other person. Please notify the sender  immediately if you have received this electronic message in error and delete it from your system. Legal information  about Eastdil Secured LLC, Eastdil Secured Advisors LLC (Securities products offered in the USA through Eastdil Secured  Advisors LLC), Eastdil Secured International Limited, Eastdil Secured International Limited (DIFC Branch), Eastdil Secured  Limited, Eastdil Secured Ireland Limited, Eastdil Secured GmbH, Eastdil Secured SAS, Eastdil Secured Hong Kong Limited  and Eastdil Secured Japan Limited is available here https://www.eastdilsecured.com/wp‐content/uploads/2021/08/ES‐ Legal‐Entities‐August‐2021.pdf and via our website: www.eastdilsecured.com ‐‐‐ Our Privacy Policy is available on our  website at https://www.eastdilsecured.com/privacy‐policy   1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 9:09 AM To:Mike Regan; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Regan,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Mike Regan <mdr@gpsportsmanagement.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 9:05 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Good morning,   I’m writing to show my support for this project.  Our agency represents the current world #1 and #2 ranked surfers in the world, Filipe Toledo and Jack Robinson. We also  represent a group of highly influential professional skateboarders. We’ve seen what their social media influence can  bring to their sponsors, events and projects like, Coral Mountain Wave Resort.   Very excited to see this project come to life!  Thanks,  Mike  Mike Regan   GP Sports Management  Cell: +1 949 444 6840  Email – mdr@gpsportsmanagement.com  2 http://www.gpsportsmanagement.com           1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:23 PM To:Chuy Reyna; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Reyna,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Chuy Reyna <Chuy.Reyna@firewiresurfboards.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:18 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hello,  I am writing regarding Coral Mountain Wave Project.  My name is Jesus “Chuy” Reyna and I live in Oceanside Ca. I’m an Ex Pro surfer and been in the surf industry for over 35  years.   I’ve surfed all over the world and can say that the Coral Mountain Project would be the best surf location in the world!  The fact that you can surf a perfect wave on demand is remarkable!   With the Coral Mountain project in palm spring along with the quality golf in the area,   You can guarantee Palm Spring as one the worlds top surf destination in the future.  I fully support CMWP and plan to buy into Coral Mountain real estate.  Thanks for your time.  Regards,  Chuy Reyna   2 www.firewiresurfboards.com              1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Saturday, June 4, 2022 11:28 AM To:Keenan Rice; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Rice,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Keenan Rice <keenanwrice@gmail.com>  Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2022 9:12 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To the La Quinta City Council ‐  I'm writing this email to share my support for the Coral Mountain project. I'm a long time resident of California, with the  last 15 years being in San Francisco. I am raising a family in the state and we love to continuously explore the state and  participate in many outdoor activities. Myself, as well as, many of our family friends in the Bay Area would add La Quinta  to our list of places to visit if Coral Mountain existed. The project aligns perfectly with a lot of bay area resident's  interests who will also be making La Quinta a future travel destination.  I'm excited for the prospect of this project which will be first of it's kind in the world! Please let it exist so I can create  some amazing memories with my family and friends!  Thanks  Keenan Rice (and family)  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Sunday, June 5, 2022 3:58 PM To:Tatiana Steelman; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Steelman,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Tatiana Steelman <tatianasteelman@gmail.com>  Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 2:00 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To: The City Council of La Quinta,  I have recently come across the coral mountain project, and I could not be more in favor of supporting such a brilliant  project. I just became a mother five days ago, and my husband and I have talked about getting a vacation home  somewhere where we can start our own family traditions for years to come. My husband is a huge golfer (we are  members at Hillcrest Country Club in Los Angeles), and because the desert is notorious for its plethora of golf courses,  he automatically wanted to look into La Quinta.   I do not play golf, and no one in my family does, and because of this, I have been unsupportive of buying a home out  there… but this all changed when we heard about Coral Mountain! We both immediately knew that this would be that  special place we had dreamt of having long lasting family memories! While my husband golfs, I can go to the wellness  area of Coral Mountain’s resort, or we can learn to surf together, and when our son is old enough, he can partake in all  of the wonderful, exciting activities this resort will offer, and we can build unforgettable bonds within our family and  likeminded individuals we meet at Coral Mountain for years to come!   We truly hope you consider our full support in moving this project forward!   Have a wonderful day,  Tatiana Ruvelson  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:24 AM To:Hunter Tyson; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Tyson,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Hunter Tyson <hunterxtyson@gmail.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:36 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To the City Council of La Quinta,   We are sisters, one is 23 and one is 26, and have lived in Los Angeles our entire lives. We used to go to the desert all of the  time, but because there is nothing to do, my mom sold her house and got a place in Malibu, and our dad bought a house in  Vegas. We have been wanting to have a desert/beach property, and La Quinta seems like a no brainer, but until there is more  life there and more of a reason to bring my family there, they won’t consider. Our dad loves surfing and has gone to the  prototype wave up in Lemoore numerous times, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to host his family and friends.  Although we don’t surf, it is the only place where we have felt that everyone could have the time of their lives, be sober (my  dad and I, and many of his friends, are sober), and bond over something most people will never get to experience, which is a  shame! If Coral Mountain comes to La Quinta, I guarantee that my family will be there more often than not, and both of my  parents would for sure want to buy properties out there to be close to Coral Mountain.We support Coral Mountan 100%!  Best,  Hunter and Tyson Salomon  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Saturday, June 4, 2022 11:28 AM To:Courtney Schwab; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Schwab,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Courtney Schwab <courtneylordschwab@gmail.com>  Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2022 11:17 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council members,  I am writing to encourage your full support for the Coral Mountain project.  I have been coming to the Coachella Valley for years to watch my daughter compete at the Desert National Horse Park. I  love the area and your beautiful community.  I believe Coral Mountain would be an exciting and wonderful addition.  Our family has had the great pleasure attending weekends at the Surf Ranch in Lemoore, California. It is really an  unforgettable experience.  As someone who had never surfed before (and in my mid 50’s) ‐ to be able to learn to ride  the waves was one of the most exhilarating feelings I’ve ever had. To go there with my adult children and see their pure  joy and excitement out on the waves, was a memory I’ll always treasure. The experience they’ve created in Lemoore  with the incredible wave pool and fabulous meals, curated by the most passionate, thoughtful and encouraging staff was  truly a one of a kind experience.  I am beyond excited about a project like this in the much more desirable and beautiful location of La Quinta. I know it  will be a huge success for families and people of all ages. I am excited that it will bring our own family together, at a  place they will all love to come and participate in healthy, fun, incredible outdoor activities.  I hope you will give your full support to this wonderful project.  2 Thank you for your consideration,  Courtney Schwab  317‐517‐0992  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Saturday, June 4, 2022 11:29 AM To:Samantha Schwab; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Schwab,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Samantha Schwab <svschwab@gmail.com>  Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2022 8:25 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Good morning,   I would like to express my strong support for the Coral Mountain Project. I have been to the Surf Ranch in Lemoore, CA 5  times over the past 8 years, and have absolutely loved my experience. As a non‐surfer 8 years ago, I consider myself a  surfer now. The wave pool taught me how to surf, but also gave me an immense appreciation for the sport. I wish others  could experience this incredible wave pool as I have had the opportunity to over the years... but it is sadly impossible for  others to book the Surf Ranch wave pool.   I have many friends, family members and acquaintances that have asked me how to get access to this pool, and I have  told them that Coral Mountain is the answer. They could not be more excited for this project: not just the wave pool,  but everything that Coral Mountain will offer.   I extend my strongest support for this project and look forward to spending time there upon completion.  Thank you,  ‐‐   Samantha Schwab  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 7:40 AM To:Jean Steel; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Steel,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Jean Steel <jlgsteel@gmail.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 7:37 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  As a La Quinta homeowner, I would like to extend my support to the Coral Mountain Wave Project. This project will be a  welcome addition to the desert community. I strongly feel that this project is a unique opportunity that will enhance our  area and further improve our ideal living environment.   Sincerely,  Bruce Steel  CEO, Equillium  1 From:Dave Stein <dave8stein@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 10:04 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:I Support Coral Mountain! ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear City Clerk, I strongly support the Coral Mountain development in La Quinta. I grew up in Southern California and have always loved that part of the State. I feel this project will make it one of the most visited places in California. The concept they are implementing will serve to improve the lives of everyone in the area. It will be the most popular attraction for many miles. It will only improve La Quinta and surrounding areas. Aloha, Dave Stein dave8stein@gmail.com 1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 3:06 PM To:Paula Turner; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro; City Clerk Mail Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Ms. Turner,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Paula Turner <paula@dppllc.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 3:00 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  I am writing in support of the Coral Mountain Resort  Project.  I have been a resident of La Quinta since 1988, currently  live at PGA West and plan to build our home on 5 acres adjacent to Coral Mountain Wave Project just north of Ave 60 on  Calle Conchita..    I am not concerned about the noise or lighting.  If  Corral Mountain plans on building high end homes on the north side  of the project, I am confident that they will make sure the noise and lighting won’t bother their residents.  The neighbors  that are complaining don’t even live close by but on average ½ to 1 mile away.  To have a project bring money to the city  by generating TOT tax instead of costing the city money to provide police and fire protection is a WIN WIN for all.   I encourage you to vote yes tonight.  We have enough golf courses in the Coachella Valley its time to bring a unique  resort community  to our amazing  city.   2                              Paula Turner  77‐933 Las Montanas Road, Suite 101  Palm Desert, CA 92211  T 760‐360‐8200  M 760‐578‐6564     CA DRE License 00702492  www.DesertPacificProperties.com            1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Sunday, June 5, 2022 8:42 PM To:connie varelli; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Consulting Planner; Danny Castro Cc:Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner Subject:Varelli, Connie: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Good afternoon Ms. Varelli, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the project at the 6/7/2022 public hearing and will be included in the public record for the project. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: connie varelli <cvarelli@gmail.com>   Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 8:18 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council Members,   I'm hoping that you will vote to approve the Coral Mountain Project.  I have owned acreage on Calle Conchita off Madison for 20 years and plan on building there.  I am totally supportive of the project and quite excited at the prospect of such a beautiful, unique and one of a kind  development in La Quinta. Especially so close to my property.  I am pro growth and was waiting for something to be developed there, with the bonus being this type of project.  As you know, the economic boost this will generate along with employment opportunities will obviously be helpful to  our city.  I appreciate the Coral Mountain people reaching out to the community with such goodwill.  The lighting display I watched from my property, i was quite pleased with what was shown.  Also, I like that the wave basin will use much less water annually than most golf courses.  Thank you for your time and consideration.  2 Sincerely,  Connie Varelli  Fka  Schivarelli               1 From:Davis Meyer <davis@visitgreaterps.com> Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 2:49 PM To:City Clerk Mail Cc:Scott White; Linda Evans Subject:Public comment for June 7, 2022 - Public Hearing item 1 Attachments:6_7_22 public hearing item 1.pdf ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Clerk: Please find the written public comment for the June 7, 2022 joint meeting of the city council and housing authority regarding “Public Hearing” item 1 attached. Thank you, davis meyer director of partnership o: 760-969-1360   1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 12:36 PM To:Lee Vosburgh; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Vosburgh,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Lee Vosburgh <lee@bahiacabo.com>  Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 10:00 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Members of the city council,  I am writing I support of coral mountain because I will not be able to attend the meeting in person.  My name is Lee Vosburgh and I am a hotel owners and resort developer.  I have visited the site of coral mountain and  studied its proposal and buisness model.  While la Quinta has been and will remain a world class golf destination I believe a new type of community and resort will  benefit the destination.  This is a new progressive approach to community with tremendous economic, social and  community benefit. The next generation of wealth want experiences that fit there lifestyle and commitment to wellness.  ,any of the traditional golf development and the older population do not fill this need.  I look forward to visiting and referring many clients who are interested in acquiring real estate if this becomes a reality.  Sincerely,  Lee Vosburgh  1 From:Jason Waggoner <jwaggoner@sunsetstudios.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:45 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:I Support Coral Mountain! ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear Council Members,   I support the development of Coral Mountain. The idea of bringing a truly unique, and world class, venue to the  Coachella Valley is something we should be embracing whole‐heartedly. The natural beauty of the Coachella Valley will  be enhanced and supported by those who have true interest in the property, and the standards by which they plan on  implementing. As a longtime investor, and visitor to the Coachella Valley it is my request that you support the continued  progress and innovation provided by Coral Mountain.   Sincerely,   Molly and Jason Waggoner  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:23 AM To:Circe Wallace; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Ms. Wallace,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Circe Wallace <cwallace@teamwass.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:54 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  To whom it may concern,  I am writing to you today in regards to the Coral Mountain La Quinta project.    As a regular visitor and La Quinta enthusiast our family is very excited about the potential for surfing wave and  community that Coral Mountain represents.    We are an active family who loves the desert but are not golfers we are surfers!   We are hopeful that this project can meet your approval as it will bring a great new aspect of development that is  environmentally responsible and meet the demand for fun and healthy activities.    With respect,  Circe   CIRCE WALLACE  Executive Vice President, Action Sports & Olympics   CWALLACE@TEAMWASS.COM  WASSERMAN CARLSBAD | T: (760) 602 6200  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Monday, June 6, 2022 2:32 PM To:Gregory Washer; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro; City Clerk Mail Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Washer,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Gregory Washer <gswasher@gmail.com>  Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 2:30 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  RE: Coral Mountain Support   Dear Council,   I am a long time resident of La Quinta. In particular, The Quarry Golf Club adjacent to the proposed Coral Mountain  Wave Project.  I own two homes located at 79820 and 79830 Remington Drive. I am in support of the project and believe it will be good  for the city of La Quinta.  I think it will be good for this far out location with this exciting new development. There are not many choices out  here for dining without going out on a 15 minute long drive to Old Town.   I believe this upscale development will spur even more investment in this area currently so far from retail. I would not  be surprised (and I would jump for joy) with a gas station/convenience store for example on the corner of 58th.   I think this type of project will cater well to my children and their children. It is important to me to have a place where  "non golf" families can enjoy this type of recreation. My 3 children grew up in Laguna Beach and would surf vs golf any  day of the week. Having it be an upscale project is paramount to its success, which I like for the type of wealthy guests it  will bring to the area.   From my vantage point, I don't think noise is an issue. Heck, there is a loud outdoor police gun range I hear already  without any problems.    If you have not already, consider the major increase of revenue in fees, bed tax, property taxes, sales taxes. Plus many  good jobs!   2 The Coral Mountain Wave Project is something I think will put La Quinta even more "on the map". It is the future, be  proud of your decision thinking ahead.   I am urging you to vote YES for my vote.  Sincerely,  Greg Washer  La Quinta Home Owner  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Friday, June 3, 2022 7:55 AM To:Frank Weigel; Robert Radi; Linda Evans; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Steve Sanchez; John Pena; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project - Support Mr. Weigel,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Frank Weigel <fweigel@me.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 10:38 PM  To: Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project ‐ Support   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hello  We are in full support of this project. We believe it will be a great addition to La Quinta year around. In the summer  months it is a struggle for local businesses to succeed this project will absolutely  attract more people to the area in the  slow summer months as well as add another family activity for all ages year around. As a member of Andalusia Country  club and homeowner in PGA West we would welcome this development in the south La Quinta area. This southern  portion of La Quinta could use some more amenities and activities it is very undeveloped.  We do not see any potential traffic issues, the roads where designed for much higher traffic flow then what is currently  being used.  Please approve this project ‐more jobs, taxes for the City and more revenue to local businesses.  Thank you,  Frank Weigel  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:21 AM To:Doug Weitman; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; kfitzpatkick@laquintaca.gov; jpina@laquintaca.gov; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro; John Pena Cc:Tania Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Coral Mountain Wave Project Mr. Weitman,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.   Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Doug Weitman <flydoug@gmail.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 7:12 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; kfitzpatkick@laquintaca.gov  <kfitzpatkick@laquintaca.gov>; jpina@laquintaca.gov <jpina@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez  <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner  <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Project   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear La Quinta City Council members,  My home is at the Quarry Golf Club in La Quinta for the past 22 years. I love La Quinta and the diversity  in this new generational shift to active and healthy lifestyle.   This property was already approved for Andalusia to build another 18 hole golf course. Another golf  course in La Quinta does not bring diversity or newness to our end of the valley.  The idea that this property will serve as a recreational and athletic development and bring a new  generation to La Quinta.  I took the time and went up to Lemore California to see the Kelly Slater wave in action.   I was very impressed with their project and also pleased to see there was very little noise from the  machine making the wave.  My other homes in the summertime is in Malibu across from Surfrider Beach. In the 42 years I’ve lived  here I’ve never seen a police action or a disturbance coming from the surfers.   As long as they can control the lighting to keep our dark sky and not cause a disturbance to the  neighbors with noise and  Traffic I am in favor of this development.   The only thing constant is change.  2 I understand many people are afraid of this development because they don’t understand it.   Please do the right thing, and approve this project.  Thank you  Doug Weitman    Doug Weitman   1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:08 PM To:Carter Westfall; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen; Danny Castro Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Can't Wait! Coral Mountain Wave Project Mr. Westfall,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Carter Westfall <carter@naturalselectiontour.com>  Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:02 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon  McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro  <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Can't Wait! Coral Mountain Wave Project   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hello La Quinta City Council Members,   I'm the Co‐Founder of Natural Selection, a multi‐faceted outdoor events and media platform  (www.naturalselectiontour.com), perhaps you are snowboard fans and caught some of our events this past winter!  The purpose of my email is to offer my support of the Coral Mountain Wave Project.  I currently don't spend much time  in the La Quinta area; however, this is EXACTLY the type of destination I would like to take my family.  I have a 6 year old  son and 3 year old daughter who live in the mountains (Jackson WY) and spend summers on the beach.  It would be  amazing to have La Quinta and Coral Mountain as part of our annual family vacation plans.  I am so excited to see this  project receive approval and get off the ground... please feel free to reach out to me with any questions or if you would  like to get more of my perspective.  Thank you so much!  Carter  Carter Westfall  Co‐Founder & CEO  Natural Selection Tour  M: 916‐241‐6335  1 From:Kevin Wright <kevindavidwright@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 10:11 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:I Support Coral Mountain! ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Hi, I’m in full support of the coral mountain project. It will be a a great addition to the community. Kevin Wright La Quinta resident Sent from my iPhone Public Hearing Item No. 1 In Opposition 1 From:Edward Armendarez <edwardcarl888@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:26 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Edward Armendarez  La Quinta  760‐625‐1888  June 7th, 2022  Public Hearings ‐ City Council Item 1  Do Not Approve: Coral Mountain Environmental Impact Report, Etc.  Dear Ms. Mayor and City Council,  I am a member of a couple of groups involved in “saving the Salton Sea.”  We have meet with our State and Federal  representatives in California and Washington DC.  We have sat in on numerous meetings with the Salton Sea Authority,  water import conferences, meetings with various organizations and other local groups.  The affects of a drying Sea are  already upon us.  The dust, some of it toxic, fills our air on a consistent basis.  Throughout the Valley, respiratory  diseases are prevalent, and it’s especially endemic in the East Valley, tragically affecting the children there hardest.  This will continue.  Water import might happen, either from the Sea of Cortez or the Pacific Ocean.  These remedies are  years away.  The Colorado River water that helped mitigate the shrinking sea and toxic dust was diminished.  The need  for that water has increased.  Lithium mining, already under way, and fully built out within 10 years, requires purified  water.  If lithium is a strategic resource, and there ever is a choice between a global essential mineral, and a few mildly  populated desert communities, guess who’ll get the water.  The future imports of Colorado River water will decline, faster than you think.  Recently, the Colorado River Basin  revised their forecast of water that can be delivered to our state.  Our supply will be diminished sooner than anyone  forecast previously.  The Chamber of Commerce, in an article in The Gem, said the Coachella Valley population will double by 2035.  I’ve read  that our aquifer isn’t guaranteed past 2045.  Since I’ve started attending meetings regarding the Salton Sea, and as so  much of the issue is about water, I started subscribing to “Maven’s Notebook.”  https://mavensnotebook.com/  It’s  about water and water management.  I recommend that you take a look at that site, and if you can handle the flood of  emails, please subscribe to the newsletters.  EVERY day there is news of the widening effects of the catastrophic drought  that we are in.  We are in a historic drought, as you know.  How long will it be before a multi‐million gallon wave pool is a concrete hole in the ground?  2 How will the populace, having their own water supplies greatly diminished, react to a resort lake in the low desert,  enjoyed by wealthy tourists?    Where will the water come from to sustain the housing there?  The housing everywhere?    Who will want to hang ten in toxic dust storms?    We don’t have the answers.  We are going to run out of water.  It’s happening faster than you realize.  Another wave  park in the Coachella Valley is insanity.  In La Quinta it’s embarrassing.  Please solicit other creative uses for that land.    Thank you for all that you do,    Edward Armendarez  1 From:Sally Arroyo <arroyosally@icloud.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:25 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments: Sally and Robert Arroyo, La Quinta, (760) 564-8125, Public Hearing Agenda Item 1 Special Joint Meeting, Coral Mountain Resort Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Thank you for allowing us to submit written comments regarding the Coral Mountain Resort to the La Quinta City  Council packet for the June 7, 2022 meeting.   Sincerely,  Sally and Robert Arroyo  57712 Salida del Sol  La Quinta, CA 92253  (760)564‐8126 arroyobob@icloud.com arroyosally@icloud.com _________________  Dear City of La Quinta Council Members:   Aside from the obvious problems and difficulties with the Coral Mountain Resort such as more light, noise and traffic,  massive water usage for the surf pool, strictly private and not open to the public with no benefit to the citizenry, short‐ term rentals, hotel, zoning, etc., there is one other major issue that should be carefully considered before any approval  and that is altering the nature/makeup of the southern portion of the City of La Quinta which would also alter the entire  City itself. Once this is changed there is no going back. Once this has been allowed it cannot be undone and will open the  gates to other developers who would also like to change the character of our community with commercial  developments in residential neighborhoods. We would also caution the City that not every piece of land in the City has  to be built on and that there is much to be said for leaving natural spaces and environments.  We are not opposed to development but development should be responsible. In this case City Council should not allow a  tourist commercial zone with short‐term rentals and a hotel within a quiet residential area. This would be consistent  with the General Plan and would not infringe on the rights of voters who rightfully counted on the continuation of that  plan and the character of neighborhoods it was designed to protect. The surf pool and the accompanying tourist  commercial zones would forever change the nature, feel and atmosphere of the City of La Quinta which the City has  tried so hard to maintain. Great care has been taken currently and in the past to cultivate “The Gem of the Desert.” One  only has to look at the City Hall and Library complex, Old Town La Quinta, all the LQ parks and trails, streets, circles and  medians to see this. La Quinta prides itself in the outdoor lifestyle and natural environment. We are not densely  populated or overly urbanized as are some of our other Coachella Valley cities such as Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage and  Palm Springs and because of this La Quinta has more appeal as a place to live and play.  One doesn’t need a “hook” like surfing to come to live and/or to play in La Quinta. In 1926 people took real notice of La  2 Quinta and have been coming since then for the peaceful natural beauty of the desert area. Coral Mountain Resort can  still have all the outdoor activities and a “Farm to Table” market/store and still be attractive to home buyers, while not  spoiling what current residents enjoy. The desert and the outdoors are the “hook” and are enough to entice people to  live/play in La Quinta despite the claims that La Quinta needs surfing with the accompanying short‐term rentals and  hotel to be “on the map” and to create generational diversity. We have generational diversity and we have been “on the  map” for a long time. The Resort can still advertise themselves as a health and wellness resort home development near  all the attractions of the Coachella Valley and Southern California. If there is a “hook” then the “hook” is a healthy  lifestyle in a beautiful home development on an ancient lake bed surrounded by wonderful and natural desert  countryside in the City of La Quinta, “The Gem of the Desert.”     We didn’t need a “hook" to move to La Quinta. We bought into a development in La Quinta that has no golf, no club  house, restaurant, community pool, etc., no amenities. We bought in Coral Mountain Estates because of the  architecture, natural beauty of the area and because it was in south La Quinta, a less urban and densely populated area  of La Quinta and the Coachella Valley. We know firsthand that reasonable changes can be made that will attract  development, but Coral Mountain Resort with its surf pool with a limited private membership of about 150 and a tourist  commercial zone will in a major way forever spoil what we have come to treasure in our one and only one‐of‐a‐kind  “Gem of the Desert."    We request that the La Quinta City Council reject any zoning changes to tourist commercial and for short‐term rentals as  well as the surf aspect for the Coral Mountain Resort.    Respectfully submitted,  Sally and Robert Arroyo  57712 Salida del Sol  La Quinta, CA 92253  (760) 564‐8126  arroyosally@icloud.com  arroyobob@icloud.com                  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Saturday, June 4, 2022 11:31 AM To:Fritz Bachli; Carlos Flores Cc:Linda Evans; John Pena; Robert Radi; Steve Sanchez; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La Quinta Mr. Bachli,  As regards your Surf Park question, the project Specific Plan includes landscaping standards, and the  conditions of approval require compliance with City requirements. Detailed landscaping plans will be  submitted with individual Site Development Permits and subsequent applications as they are submitted.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com>  Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2022 8:47 AM  To: Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Linda Evans <lindaevans2014laquinta.video@gmail.com>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi  <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La Quinta   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hi Carlos and Nicole Sauviat!    These questions are addressed to both of you! (Trilogy Perimeter & Surf Park)   As the Leading Agency for the Trilogy Perimeter Restoration Project the planning department has finally responded to  my No.1 Question, namely that the la Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 8.13 is enforced for this particular 60+ acre  project. This answer was long overdue?  Landscape Approvals include Irrigation requirements which is my introduction for the No. 2 Question! Since day one of  our discussions regarding this topic, I have been seeking an answer concerning the location and filing procedures of the  documents for projects the City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency? No documents are in existence hence no records are  available. This was the official answer from the City? Makes no sense considering the vast spectrum of items covered by  the Code which, if met, will ultimately lead to the permit?   Presently, Trilogy is spending thousands of Dollars for legal expenses related to the Perimeter construction. During  a period of three years, I have been closely monitoring and documenting the Reconstruction process and witnessed first  hand some of the construction activities / administrative decision making, as they occurred at the time and most likely  were not in compliance with the Code 8.13? We could have saved enormous legal expenses in the past and will most  likely also do so in the future with a tight oversight by the Landscape Architect in cooperation with the Lead Agency and  2 CVWD that these Codes and Ordinances are met. Doing the job right for the first time on the construction site and not to  be argued in the courts is key?    "Item B" in the LC Municipal Code regarding the "Final Landscaping Plan Application Submittal Requirements" is very  detailed and requires signatures from the responsible people of areas they are responsible for. It's a complex Code and I  understand that potential applicants often turn away from adopting and following the Code. "Lawmakers" have to  identify and stop the "Lawbreakers" and punish violators under the law as mentioned in "Item C" of the Municipal Code.    Surf Park: What is the status of the surf park in terms of the Landscape Package Documentation and where are the  appropriate records for the project being filed? Does the EIR and FEIR comply with the standards of the Code 8.13?    I ask for clarification in this matter and welcome any suggestions to better understand in what direction we are heading  as a City and / or Community in case of Code 8.13. In times of a severe drought, which we are presently faced with, Lead  Agencies, the CVWD and Landscape Architects have to work together in order not to let Landscape matters get out of  hand.     I think there is plenty of room for improvement in this approval process. In other words: "Say what you do and what is  expected ‐ and ultimately do what you say!"     Thank you.    FEB           On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 9:00 AM Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com> wrote:  Hi Carlos,     To question No. 1, thank you for the long awaited response. I have noticed that the La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter  8.13 entitled "Water Efficient Landscaping" was approved, adopted and signed on 8/2/2016 by Mayor Evans and the  City Attorney Mr. Ihrke. (Ordinance No. 544 Amending Title 8, Chapter 8.13, the Cities "Efficient Landscaping  Ordinance").    I noticed that a "Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance" is attached to the aforementioned revision dated  8/2/2016? It demonstrates to potential applicants all of the appendices which need to be filed with signatures and  dates, in particular Appendix C the Certificate of Completion. Is the City still required to follow this Model? I  would appreciate a sample that is currently provided to potential applicants. Thank you.    To question No.2  I apologize for using an incorrect CVWD Ordinance. As listed in all of my previous messages  concerning this topic, I have always referred to Ordinance 1302.3 and by mistake in my message of 4/17/2022: 1303.2  which is incorrect.    Finally, going back to my original questions in this matter, please refer to my e‐mail dated 7/24/2021 (Question No. 2)  concerning the matter of: Supporting Documents of Approval....?    Thank you.   FEB          On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 4:51 PM Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote:        Carlos Flores | Senior Planner  3 Design and Development  City of La Quinta  78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253  Ph. 760.777.7069  www.laquintaca.gov         From: Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com>   Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2022 5:26 PM  To: Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La Quinta     ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **     Hi Carlos,       We have been discussing this topic for one year now and I appreciate the various responses you provided in the past.  However, I consider your latest answers once again vague. They seem to be covering up findings to legal questions  which came up before, during as well as after the approval and the construction process itself.     Following your suggestion, I approached LQ Compliance and in a rather unsubstantiated response to my official  inquiry I was turned away with the written statement: "We don't deal with this kind of Policy matters?"      I have confidence in your work but I never trust in such important issues without prior verification!     1) I am interested in receiving, in writing, which are "your codes" you are referring to that support your approval for  the reconstruction of the 60 acre plus interior perimeter reconstruction at the Trilogy Golf course? The document  carried your signature in the position of an Assistant Planner and was sent to the BOD of the Trilogy Community on  February 12, 2018?  The codes are the La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 8.13, found here:  https://library.municode.com/ca/la_quinta/codes/municipal_code?nodeId=TIT8BUCO_CH8.13WAEFLA     2) Has a Landscape and Irrigation Pre‐Submittal Checklist according to "Ordinance 1303.2", incl. Appendices, been  completed, submitted and signed by the project applicant for the Interior Perimeter? That's an easy straightforward  question which you never answered?  They have to meet the rules and regulations found in the previous question, as  well as any from CVWD. Not sure exactly what ordinance you’re referring to, but they have met the checklist  requirements from our Code and CVWD reviews for theres.      With my letter dated July 24, 2021 I did ask basically the same questions as listed above. Neither you, who signed the  Reconstruction Approval or the LQ Code Compliance office, have supported my efforts in helping to further eliminate  possible future lawsuits against the parties involved in this project.The Golf Course (incl. the Bistro) is now for sale!     It is my belief that based on pursuing for three years the Interior Perimeter Project that very costly lawsuits, so far,  could have been avoided if the city respected and adopted established State, County and City Landscape and Irrigation  Laws and Ordinances!     Note: While on the subject matter and, considering the City of La Quinta as the Lead Agency, which are the Laws and  Ordinances instrumental and required to be applied in order to approve the "Wave Surfpark" in terms of the  "Landscape and Irrigation Approval Process".      I sent this message to Nicole Sauviat‐Criste for Information as she is dealing with the kind of topic before us.   4    Thank you.      Best. FEB                               On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 8:40 AM Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Good morning Fritz,    The PLA was approved in compliance with our codes, and CVWD approved as well. The signed and approved plans are the documents that show the compliance with City and CVWD rules and regulations.        Carlos Flores | Senior Planner  Design and Development  City of La Quinta  78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253  Ph. 760.777.7069  www.laquintaca.gov         From: Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com>   Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 2:30 PM  To: Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: farida bachli <spudsgrammy@gmail.com>; Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La Quinta     ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **     UNANSWERED QUESTION: HAS THE PLA RESTORATION BEEN APPROVED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW?  (Reference is made to the FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 2018‐0001 ‐ TRILOGY INTERIOR PERIMETER dated 2/12/2018  signed by Carlos Flores, Associate Planner, City of La Quinta.)      Hi Christina,     In search of my answer, I once again request a formal written response whether the PLA was approved and built in  2017 according to the CVWD Code 1302.3 and the LQ Municipal Code Section 8.13 or any other governing documents  written into law and passed by a legislative body!     If I understand correctly, the Code Compliance Division works in partnership with the citizens and businesses in La  Quinta to promote and maintain a safe and pleasing environment in which to work and visit. This is achieved  through community involvement, education and ENFORCEMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATION.     5 During a public and special joint session in the La Quinta City Hall on September 28, 2021 Code Issues, as listed in the  Draft EIR for the Surf Park, were discussed before the City Council and in the presence of the Planning Commission.  (View: City of La Quinta Video Archive: 9/28/2021. The subject matter dealt with the Surf Park, in particular the  calculation of the Water Usage (MAWA, etc?)     On 10/5/2021 a detailed presentation (View: City of LQ Video Archive: 10/5/2021) was streamed for the public by the  CVWD on the City Hall screen. I can imagine it was in response to the questions in the September 28/2021  meeting.The presentation outlined the latest approval process and the submission of the required documentation  leading  to a permit. The speaker reminded the audience: Your City has approved a Landscape Ordinance which  projects are to comply with? (CVWD slides entitled: Landscape Plan Check) No permit ‐ no water meter ‐ no  water!  Projects are placed on a future inspection list.     Thank you for getting back to me in this matter. Residents in our community would like to see an answer to the  questions listed.     Fritz E. Bachli  (978) 352‐7494     On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 6:02 PM Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com> wrote:  Hi Christina,      I have discussed my three key questions with Mr. Carlos Flores on many occasions and I also exchanged with him  several emails detailing the underlying causes which prompted me to address this issue before the start of the  project and after the completion of the reconstruction. My basic questions were never answered? This is the reason  why I reached out to Code Compliance.      As a Trilogy Community Member, I am familiar with the Perimeter project and the CVWD Ordinance and the  City Municipal Code, two documents which establish the same basic consent in terms of "Water Efficient  Landscaping".      I do not wish to pursue this matter any further but hopefully put it to rest based on the answers to the inquiry  submitted to your office.     Thank you.     FEB                 On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 4:14 PM Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Mr. Bachli, can I get your phone number and a good time for Carlos to call you? It will be much easier to have a  discussion vs. email.     Thank you,         6 Christina Gamez|Code Compliance Administrative Technician   City of La Quinta  78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253  Ph. 760.777.7063  www.laquintaca.gov   www.playinlaquinta.com     From: Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com>   Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 3:16 PM  To: Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La  Quinta     ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **     Hi Christina,      You are giving me a tough time! :)      Why is your office not responding to my very fundamental and simple questions l have approached you with in my  email dated July 24, 2021?      Isn't Code Compliance, your office, in a position to confirm that the reconstruction work carried out on the  Perimeter of the Golf Course is compliant, or not and why not, with the established building consents for such  major restorations (60+ acres) by the City of La Quinta and the CVWD authorities?  (City of La Quinta Municipal  Code 8.13 and CVWD Ordinance 1203.3 both dealing with Water Efficient Landscaping).     That's all I am asking for, straight forward, and to the point! Please understand that evasive answers to my s;pecific  questions leave the impression that the Perimeter was a reconstruction project not in line with the established  building consents?     I am looking forward to your "best" answers!     FEB                   On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:53 AM Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Good morning Mr. Bachli,      The City of La Quinta Code Compliance has received your request. There are no property maintenance violations  and the landscape plan was approved, therefore there is no action for us to take on this.     Thank you,      7  Christina Gamez|Code Compliance Administrative Technician   City of La Quinta  78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253  Ph. 760.777.7063  www.laquintaca.gov   www.playinlaquinta.com     From: Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com>   Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 9:01 PM  To: Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La  Quinta     ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **     Hi Christina,       I have asked the very basic questions labelled above with No. 1‐3 to Mr. Flores before but never got the answers I  expected to get from a planning professional in the capacity of Mr.Flores who himself issued the approval of the  project in question! For this reason, I approached the Code Compliance office expecting the team to investigate  this matter and issue an independent report!     The latest response seems to get closer to the fundamental answer I am looking for by providing qualifying  definitions like: "Necessary Regulations" and the "City's Municipal Code"?     I am of the opinion that compliance means conforming to a rule such as a specifications, policy, standard, law or  ordinance, etc.Regulatory compliance is available to a builder / contractor before the beginning of a  reconstruction or new construction as for example indicated and referred to as Ordinance 1302, and adopted by  the City of LA Quinta in their Draft EIR for the Wave Park.      Looking forward to your response. Should you have any questions, please let me know..      Thank you. FEB         On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:43 PM Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Hi Fritz,     From your questions on which ordinances and sections have been met, the Final Landscape Plan document  approval, which was previously provided to you, provides confirmation on approval of the necessary regulations.  The approved plans includes approval from the Coachella Valley Water District, where they would review the  plans for their necessary regulations. The entire plan set the applicant provided for the Final Landscape Plan is  what is reviewed and approved to make sure it meets the City’s Municipal Code.      8 Multiple inspections of the site have been completed to ensure compliance with the plan and have confirmed  this compliance.  Any future complaints on the landscaping, including maintenance of it, that includes  landscaping within the public view, can be formally made to our Code Compliance team.      Carlos Flores | Senior Planner  Design and Development  City of La Quinta  78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253  Ph. 760.777.7069  www.laquintaca.gov         From: Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com>   Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2021 2:33 PM  To: Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La  Quinta     ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **     Hi Christina, thank you for your response.      ‐Our HOA would certainly want to know on what basis the City of La Quinta has approved this massive 60+acre  Perimeter reconstruction! The literature which I picked up at the City Hall, prior to seeing the approval from the  planning department which was signed by Mr. Flores, the leaflet explains that your office deals with  "Enforcement of Municipal Code Regulations". I thought this definition covers my non compliance item and falls  under your office's jurisdiction?     ‐Mr. C. Flores, on several occasions in the past, has provided me with answers to my specific questions regarding  this matter.. However, this "public view" limitation never came up and is new to me?   ‐  Anyway, may I ask you to pursue this matter with the following concentration:  1) Have Ordinances 1302.3 (CVWD Code) and / or (Municipal Code 8.13) of the City of La Quinta been executed  and met by the city of  La Quinta?  2) If yes, where are the supporting documents of proof  leading to the approval based on Ord. 1302.3 and the LQ  Municipal Code 8.13?  3) If not, why not? What type of approval conditions have been met for the city approval?     Please help and provide specific answers to my question! Thank you.     Best. FEB        On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 11:38 AM Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Good Afternoon Mr. Bachili,      I have spoken with Carlos Flores and the planning department regarding your email and followed up with the  hard copy of such. This is a matter that would need to be discussed with your HOA. The City of La Quinta Code  Compliance division addresses property maintenance in public view. Please refer to your CC&R’s with your HOA  for your private gated community.      9 Thank you,       Christina Gamez|Code Compliance Administrative Technician   City of La Quinta  78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253  Ph. 760.777.7063  www.laquintaca.gov   www.playinlaquinta.com     From: Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com>   Sent: Saturday, July 3, 2021 6:34 PM  To: Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La  Quinta     ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **     Hi Christina,      Did you receive my Yellow 8 1/2 " envelope sent by regular mail on June 28, 2021 from the Post Office in La  Quinta? It contained the copies mentioned in my email dated June 19, 2021?       Since my non‐compliance report was initially not confirmed as received by your office / the City of LQ, I  question the reporting process I have chosen as being acceptable or do you suggest another avenue to deliver a  non compliance report?     Thank you.     Best. FEB          On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:56 AM Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Thank you, Mr. Bachli, I have received your response.     From: Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com>   Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 10:50 AM  To: Christina Gamez <cgamez@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: "Report of City Code Violation" dated 5/26/2021 / Trilogy Community, 60151 Trilogy Parkway, La  Quinta     ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **     Hi Christina, I have received a copy of my submission! Thank you.       10 After connecting with Carlos Flores, who most likely did not receive my email dated March 2, 2021 (change of  his email address?), I shall discuss this matter once again with him and, depending on his feedback, change my  Report of City Violence with a new version or possibly drop the case altogether (refer to Item 8 under  heading:  Property Maintenance Problems).      In time, I shall connect with you again.      Best. FEB     On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 9:51 AM Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com> wrote:  Dear Christina,      The following copies of documents which will be included in the "snail‐mail" package mentioned in my  previous message of today:     Enclosure A:   Internet reference to "City Code Violation Form" directions downloaded from LQ City website.  (1 Page)         "        B:    Blank copies of "Report of City Code Violation" (3 Pages)         "        C:    Submission of filled in "Report of City Code Violation" by Fritz Bachli (3 Pages)                          ‐with request to receive a copy of my submission by indicating my email address on Page 3/3?         "        D:    Report of City Code Violation / Confirming receipt of Report indicating phone number in case of  any further questions                   "        E:    Request for copy of non‐compliance submission! Please refer to Enclosure C.      I hope that this information will help you to trace the missing document and providing me with a complete  copy of my submission.      Thank you  Fritz E. Bachli  978 352‐7494     On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 9:01 AM Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com> wrote:  Dear Christina,      Following your request, based on our phone conversation on 6/11/2021 and your statement that my official  "Report of City Code Violation" submitted on the "City Code Violation Form" (Download) can not be found  with the city, I would like to send you by "snail‐mail" copies of documents indicating the path which I used to  approach your office. As you can see, the receipt of my submission was promptly confirmed with a phone  number in case of any further questions. Consequently, I called the number and Michael Salas,  Compliance Officer 1 who responded to the call suggested to take up this matter directly with you.     In the meantime, reviewing all my documentation which led to my Report as submitted, I have noticed that  an email to Mr. Carlos Flores mentioned in my non‐compliance submission dated March 2,2021 might not  have received the desk of the recipient due to a change of his email address. I shall send him the same  message and once I have his response I intend to adjust, if necessary, the non‐compliance report or, if  justified, possibly withdraw the report sent on 5/26/2021 altogether.     Please let me know when you find the missing report and provide me with a copy.     Thank you.  Fritz E. Bachli  (978 352‐7494  11    On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:36 AM Fritz Bachli <fritzebachli@gmail.com> wrote:  Hi Christina,      May I kindly ask you, as stated in your official form entitled "Report of City Code Violation" (Page 3/3), to  email to my address a copy of my non compliance submission in question. I did receive your name from  Michael Salaz during a recent phone conversation with him regarding this matter. He recommended that I  submit my request to you directly!     Thank you.     Fritz E. Bachli  Trilogy Resident  (978) 352 7494  1 From:Tania Flores Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:51 AM To:Monika Radeva Cc:City Clerk Mail; Cheri Flores; Consulting Planner; Danny Castro Subject:FW: Slides for tonight's City Council meeting Attachments:Climate change slides.pptx Good morning, I received the email below with attached presentation from a member of the public wishing to provide public comment at tonight’s City Council meeting. Thank you. Tania Flores | Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760)777-7023 TFlores@LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov City Hall is now open to the public during normal business hours. Please follow all CDC and State recommended guidelines as they pertain to COVID-19 safety and awareness. All public services continue to be available via phone, email or online web portal and the public is encouraged to utilize these services when possible. Thank you. From: Tracy Bartlett <tlbartlett19@gmail.com>   Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:34 AM  To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Slides for tonight's City Council meeting  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Good morning Tania,  I will be speaking tonight at the City Council Meeting. My slides are attached.   Katie Barrows is also speaking. She does not have slides but will speak after me.   Respectfully submitted,  Tracy L Bartlett  Certified Climate Steward  6/7/2022 1 SHOW US YOUR STRIPES! Developed by Professor Ed Hawkins, University of Reading, 2018. Data updated through 2021. 1 2 6/7/2022 2 Temperature  Change in Riverside County 1895‐2021 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010 3 4 1 From:bbishop40@verizon.net Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:54 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Council Agenda June 7, 2022-Letter to Council Members Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  June 7, 2022  Honorable Members of the La Quinta City Council,  We are La Quinta residents, residing in the Trilogy at La Quinta community.   We strongly oppose the Coral Mountain Resort project, which includes 600 homes, a hotel and  a 20‐acre, 18 million gallon surf lagoon.  We strongly oppose any rezoning that would be  required for this project to be approved and move forward, and changes made to the La  Quinta 2035 General Plan.  The Coral Mountain Resort clearly is the wrong project for the wrong place, at the wrong time.  A surf lagoon in this desert during this time of continuing California drought is   and would flaunt a blatant disregard for the critical water shortages  experienced in this state, and elsewhere. Emergency measures are now in place to reduce  non‐essential water use, affecting more than 6 million southern California residents, including  in our own Riverside County. California has experienced dramatic periods of drought since  1986 and long‐term climate projections are dire unless we act now to mitigate these  dangerous weather conditions.  This project clearly goes against all logic and common sense.  In addition to objecting to rezoning and the surf lagoon, we object to the project’s  ruination of  the visuals, access and setting of the beautiful Coral Mountain and its natural setting, situated  adjacent to the Santa Rosa National Monument. Increased traffic, noise pollution and light  pollution would all add to the degradation of the current pristine natural environment existing  here for hundreds of years.  Please do not allow the Coral Mountain Resort project to go forward.   Thank you for your time and attention.  2 Respectfully,  Guy and Barbra Bishop  60415 Living Stone Drive  La Quinta CA  92253  760‐777‐8675   1 From:Alena Callimanis <acallimanis@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 6:17 PM To:Monika Radeva Cc:City Clerk Mail; Laurie McGinley Subject:I would like to submit this for the Public Record for Coral Mountain Surf Resort June 7, 2022 Attachments:Attorney General Letter Dated January 10 2022.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  I would like to submit this for the public record for Coral Mountain.  I have also provided this document in hardcopy this  evening to Council and staff.  Thank you very much.  Sincerely,  Alena Callimanis  91469 Rustic Canyon Dr.  La Quinta, CA 92253  January 10, 2022 The Attorney General of the State of California Department of Justice 1300 I Street, Suite 125 Sacramento, CA 94244—2550 Attention: Mr. Scott Lichtig, Esq. Delivered via Email: scott.lichtig@doj.ca.gov Telephone: (916) 210-7815 Dear Sir: RE: Proposed Coral Mountain Resort, La Quinta, CA As a group of concerned residents of the City of La Quinta, California, we are writing to the Office of the Attorney General to request an investigation into the conduct of the City of La Quinta (the “City”) and its agents regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report (the “DEIR”) prepared for a project known as the Coral Mountain Resort (the “Project”). We are also asking for a review of the Project’s Draft Environmental Impact Report that was released on June 22, 2021. The entire DEIR can be found on the City of La Quinta’s website for the Coral Mountain Resort: https://www.laquintaca.gov/our-city/city-departments/design-and- development/planning-division/the-wave-at-coral-mountain. Points in this letter will specifically address the following: SECTION 1.0 Our specific concerns regarding the DEIR including aspects of its preparation and timing for required review 2.0 Excessive Water Usage by this Project, particularly in times of Climate Change and the statewide drought that has been declared 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emission concerns which cannot be mitigated for this Project Page of 1 10 In our view, the City has breached its fiduciary responsibilities under the CEQA Legislation to conduct an independent and thorough assessment of the Project’s environmental impacts and the impact it will have on the residents of La Quinta and the Coachella Valley. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In brief, the Project entails the construction of a private Resort Community on land currently zoned as low density residential. Approval of the Project requires changing of the current zoning from Low Density Residential to Tourist Commercial. The Project will consist of six hundred dwellings, a one hundred and fifty room hotel and water features including a 16.6 acre man made wave/surf basin containing 18 million gallons of aquifer water. 1.0 CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROJECT’S DEIR In our view, the City has failed to meet the requirements of the CEQA guidelines in the following areas as identified in Sections 1.1 - 1.2 following. Additional concerns regarding the DEIR are presented in Sections 1.3 - 1.5. It is our opinion that the City of La Quinta as the Lead Agency and the Consulting Planner who has been engaged by the City, appear to show bias towards the approval of the Project and additionally, have overseen the preparation of a DEIR that fails to meet the requirements for such reports under CEQA. 1.1 The DEIR for this Project is not in keeping with CEQA Guidelines Several emails summarizing readers’ concerns with the DEIR were sent to the Consulting Planner on July 2, 2021 along with a request to modify the existing DEIR so that it would be in keeping with CEQA guidelines. These emails, as well as the responses from the Consulting Planner, are presented in the PDF A: Communications with the Consulting Planner, which is included in the covering email with this letter. It is of note that, in their responses to the DEIR, other reputable agencies had also requested that the DEIR be modified and/or redone and reissued for various reasons. We would be please to provide you with these responses should you wish to review the comments from these agencies. Page of 2 10 To summarize, the points expressed by concerned readers of the DEIR were generally with respect to its extraordinary length (at over 1500 pages with its multiple appendices), and the fact that it is replete with redundancy and lacking in plain language. In other words, it appears that there was a general lack of compliance with CEQA guidelines. Our request to have the DEIR modified to allow for rapid understanding by the average reader was outrightly dismissed by the Consulting Planner literally within hours of our request. 1.2 Inadequate amount of time allowed for public review of DEIR In our opinion, this DEIR was literally “pushed through” on a timeline that did not allow for reasonable public input and consultation for a complex Project of this magnitude with the potential impact a tourist commercial zoning change would have on the established residential communities that surround it. We are aware of other jurisdictions in California that encourage longer periods of public review (often up to 45 days) to allow for dissemination of information. Longer periods of time for review of a DEIR encourage public trust and thus protects the public interest. In fact, we had asked for an extension to the DEIR review period to 45 days and were outrightly denied. Again please reference PDF A (Communications with Consulting Planner) for details of our request for this extension of time for review. 1.3 Concerns regarding the appearance of multiple Conflicts of Interest 1.3.1 Objectivity of MSA Consulting Inc. and other Consultants (EIR Preparers) The City and its Consulting Planner engaged a consulting engineering firm, MSA Consulting Inc., to conduct studies to be included in the DEIR without disclosure that the consulting engineers had prior (and will likely have future) involvement with the Developers in the Project. The neutrality of the consulting engineering firm can be called into question as they have previously and will in the future, receive financial gain through their engagement in the design and construction of the Project. Of additional concern is the fact that MSA was selected to work and to provide input on the DEIR (and, we assume, the EIR going forward). There are additional “objectivity” concerns with the other consultants as well. For example, the lighting study was performed by Musco Lighting, who we understand will supply the elevated lighting towers for the Project. Page of 3 10 1.3.2 Selection of Consultants by the Developer It is our opinion that the Consultants involved in the preparation of the DEIR were selected by the Developer. Evidence supporting this opinion is found upon examination of the information contained in the Appendices attached to the DEIR. The concern that we have in this regard is the following: If Developers choose consultants for the DEIR Process and pay them, then the potential for tilting the process further in the favor of Developer is strong, and the potential impact on the public interest, and on public confidence in their local government, is significantly reduced. An EIR prepared by a consultant selected and hired (directly or indirectly) by the Developer is by its nature a document that must be treated skeptically. Objectivity and transparency are paramount in the CEQA process. We are aware that in some jurisdictions, the lead agencies hire independent Consultants and then recover the cost from the Developer. In our view, this is what should have been done with this Project, again to ensure the protection of the public interest. 1.3.3 Consulting Planner’s Firm previously engaged to develop the City’s General Plan The firm Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc. (http://www.terranovaplanning.com) of which the City of La Quinta’s Consulting Planner Ms Nicole Criste is a Principal, was previously engaged by the City of La Quinta to develop the 2035 La Quinta General Plan https:// www.laquintaca.gov/business/lq2035-general-plan. We therefore assume that Ms. Criste was involved in the writing of the following in the City’s General Plan: “All development proposals must be analyzed and tested for consistency with the goals, policies, and programs in every applicable element of the General Plan. Specific Plans and the Zoning Ordinance must be consistent with the General Plan. General Plan consistency is also a required criteria for determining significant impacts under CEQA.” (Section I-5 Administration) Our concerns center around the following: •Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc. is now engaged on the Coral Mountain Resort Project as Ms. Criste is the Consulting Planner for this Project. Page of 4 10 •There is a requirement now for the City to significantly amend the General Plan to permit this Project. •It now appears that Ms. Criste has prepared a DEIR for this Project that is going against what is included in the General Plan for the City of La Quinta, therefore the antithesis to what was prepared by her firm to be included in the General Plan. We take the position that the City could have chosen a different Consulting Planner for this Project. The appearance of a conflict of interest Should have been avoided, again in keeping with protection of the public interest as well as to ensure public trust in the Process. 1.4 Lack of Adequate Public Consultation re: the amendment of the City’s General Plan A significant change is proposed to the City’s General Plan with this Project. We are of the opinion that many opportunities for open and transparent public consultations, separate from the review of any Project, must be held when considering a significant amendment to a city’s General Plan. 1.5 Comments made by the City’s Planning Department in a public forum appear to be in support of the Project, well in advance of the commencement of the CEQA Process. We also have concerns regarding the obvious advance knowledge and public comments made about the Project by a representative of the City’s Planning Department. In the March 2019 issue of Men’s Health Journal, mention was made of the Project. Mr. Danny Castro, La Quinta City Director of Design and Development, was quoted as saying the following: “Thanks for the article Stephen. It shows our …city… is already reviewing this with positive thinking.” Danny Castro, said staff is reviewing the Coral Mountain proposal. “It’s something new, obviously. It’s not a golf course,” Castro said. “This new technology is something I think people are excited about…This is a different aspect and type of wellness activity that just makes us more diverse in terms of attracting people to La Quinta. “ This comment certainly leads one to believe that the Planning Department had “pre-approved” the Project nearly one full year in advance of the Project’s Notice of Preparation being released. In fact, this comment was made even prior to the determination that an EIR was required for the Project. Page of 5 10 2.0 CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED WATER USAGE (DRAWN FROM THE AQUIFER) FOR THE PROJECT 2.1 Inadequate assessment in DEIR of water consumption We are of the opinion that the Coachella Valley Water District has not adequately analyzed the Project’s water usage taking into consideration the perilous state of the Colorado River and the aquifer beneath the City of La Quinta (known as the Indio Subbasin). The aquifer is currently in an overdraft state. Given our current situation, with climate change and the Governor’s proclamation of drought throughout all of California, we are gravely concerned about the required use of the wave basin’s usage of water pumped directly from the aquifer. It has been estimated that 18 million gallons of aquifer water is required to simply fill the wave pool which is 1/2 mile long and 400 feet wide. It is very important to note that recycled water cannot be used for the wave basin component of the Project. This requirement arises from state restrictions on water quality where human recreation takes place. Our aquifer, which supplies the large portion of drinking water for the Coachella Valley, must be also used for the continued filling due to evaporation and ongoing maintenance of the wave basin. 2.2 MAWA ( "Maximum Applied Water Allowance” ) The City of La Quinta has MAWA requirements within the City Ordinances that were not considered for this Project in the DEIR analysis. 2.3 Water Loss Due to Evaporation The Project’s estimated aquifer water consumption does not accurately account for the extraordinary amount of water lost to evaporation and due to: •the wave motion in the surf basin itself (in that droplets will be dispersed increasing the amount of evaporative loss), •the extraordinary number of hot days in the desert which, according to records, are increasing due to Climate Change, and •the increased number of significant wind events in the desert. Page of 6 10 2.3 Water Loss Due to Wave Pool Operation Additionally the DEIR did not take into account the enormous and ongoing draw on the desert’s aquifer water that will be required for the maintenance and refilling of the wave basin as a result of evaporation and continued maintenance and operational requirements. 3.0 CONCERNS REGARDING PROPOSED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS We wholeheartedly agree with and support the following statement taken from the Attorney General’s website: … “Every community has an obligation to consider how its general plan update may affect its community-wide greenhouse gas emissions and to take affirmative, decisive action to reduce and control these emissions”… It is our opinion that a very superficial review of the environmental impact that Greenhouse Gas (“GHG”) emissions created by the Project has been performed. We ask you to please consider the following concerns we have with respect to GHG Emissions for the Project: 3.1 The Imperial Irrigation District’s Will Serve Letter It was implied in the DEIR that a "Will Serve Letter” from the Imperial Irrigation District was in place for the supply of electricity when it fact no such agreement or letter was in place. The Will Serve Letter had expired long before the Notice of Preparation (“NOP") for the Project was issued in February of 2021, leading the readers of the NOP and DEIR to believe that an agreement had been arrived at with the utility provider. In actual fact, no such agreement had been entered into at that time and it was inaccurately represented to readers of the DEIR that GHG emissions for this Project had been thoroughly analyzed. 3.2 Increased Vehicular Traffic The cursory review of GHG emission in the DEIR has failed to consider the GHG emissions created by the significant increase in vehicular traffic to the resort. Page of 7 10 3.3 Additional Electrical Generation Only passing consideration was given to the GHG emissions created by the significant electrical power generation required to supply the large electrically powered equipment that will generate man made waves for surfing between 7AM and 10PM each day of the year. The DEIR states that large lighting towers will be erected around the wave pool to permit for use of the facility for night surfing on a daily basis. No mention is made within the DEIR of the source for the additional power generation for the Project. As we are all aware, power demand is such in the state that rolling blackouts are required during periods of peak demand yet this issue is not addressed in the DEIR. 3.4 Additional Sources of GHG The DEIR fails to take into account the significant GHG emissions that are generated as a byproduct of the cement production necessary for a project of this size, particularly with respect to the construction of the concrete wave basin, which in itself is 16.7 acres in area. 3.5 DEIR Statement Regarding GHG Emission Section 4.7.6 on page 4-7.26 in the DEIR states the following with respect to GHG emissions for this Project: …GHG-1: “Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the Project Applicant shall purchase a minimum of 72,000 MTCO2e credits (2,400 MTCO2e per year for 30 years). The purchase of carbon credits must be made from a CARB-approved carbon registry with independent third- party verification” and, further ( Levels of Significance after Mitigation) …The net annual GHG emissions associated with the operation of the proposed project can be reduced from 6.46 to 3.62 MTCO2e per SP per year, which is less than the applicable threshold of 3.65 MTCO2e per SP per year. Nevertheless, as explained above, because the use of carbon credits has not been broadly adopted in the Coachella Valley to mitigate GHG emissions impacts of residential and resort communities, and because even with the purchase of carbon credits the project’s actual GHG emissions exceed the applicable threshold (even though the emissions, net of carbon credits, do not), this analysis conservatively considers the project to have a significant and unavoidable impact concerning GHG emissions. (emphasis by writer) As an aside, amongst other documents, we have read the document entitled “CEQA and Climate Change” from the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (2008) https:// opr.ca.gov/docs/june08-ceqa.pdf and have many questions about how the CEQA Process for this Project is compliant with this (and many other) technical advisories. We recognize however this letter is not the forum in which to address this in detail. We are citing this document however because of the comments in the document that speak to goals for the State of California to reduce Page of 8 10 GHG emissions “to 1990 levels by the year 2020…with further reductions to follow”. A Project like this, where an assessment of the GHG emissions in the DEIR appear to be perfunctorily glossed over is hardly in keeping with the stated goals, particularly in these times of uncertainty related to Climate Change. We are grateful for your consideration of our concerns regarding the proposed Project’s DEIR. In closing and in summary, we ask that you please consider the following 3 points that we raise: 1. We, as concerned residents of the City of La Quinta, are of the opinion that to date, due process for this Project has not been followed as required by CEQA and that perceived conflicts or interest must be addressed. At first glance, we are also of the opinion that it appears that the approval of this Project, with its magnitude and far reaching consequences, has not been allowed sufficient time for public input. 2. Significant environmental concerns have been continuously raised by residents with respect to the long term impact the Project will have on the environment and the quality of life for generations of Californians to come in the Coachella Valley, particularly with respect to the water usage and unresolved issues with Greenhouse Gas Emissions. We note that the mission statement of the Office of the Attorney General of California includes the following: “…Safeguard California's human, natural and financial resources for this and future generations”. 3. Finally, we wish to include the following from the CEQA Guidelines to the readers’ attention which we feel this was not observed in the DEIR for this Project: 15084. PREPARING THE DRAFT EIR (from page 191 CEQA Guidelines) … (e) … The draft EIR which is sent out for public review must reflect the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency is responsible for the adequacy and objectivity of the draft EIR. We would very much appreciate consideration of the concerns identified in this letter by the Office of the Attorney General of California. Page of 9 10 Additionally, can you please provide us with an opinion as to whether the DEIR for this Project has or has not been prepared in keeping with CEQA guidelines? If not, can you please advise what the next steps would/should be? Thank you in advance for considering our requests. Yours very truly, Ramon Baez Nancy Bruce 81245 Andalusia 80843 Calle Azul La Quinta, CA 92253 La Quinta, CA 92253 Alena Callimanis Wendy Clarke 81469 Rustic Canyon Dr. 81566 Ulrich Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253 La Quinta, CA 92253 Anast Demitt Jim Lewis 60149 Honeysuckle Street 60106 Aloe Circle La Quinta, CA 92253 La Quinta, CA 92253 Diane Rebryna Kathy Weiss 60149 Honeysuckle Street Resident La Quinta, CA 92253 La Quinta, CA 92253 Kelly Welton Carolyn Winnor 60106 Aloe Circle 81134 Barrel Cactus Rd. La Quinta, CA 92253 La Quinta, CA 92253 Derek M Wong Sheila Warren 81183 Caspian Ct. 81856 Rustic Canyon Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 La Quinta, 92253 Page of 10 10 1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Wednesday, June 8, 2022 11:10 AM To:Eve Castles; Linda Evans; Robert Radi; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Jon McMillen Cc:Wes Castles; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: Wave Park Ms. Castles,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council as part of the public record for the  project. The Council will consider the project at a continued public hearing on July 5, 2022.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Eve Castles <evecastles@gmail.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 8:34 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>;  Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Wes Castles <wcastles4@gmail.com>  Subject: Re: Wave Park   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  PLEASE STEP BACK AND LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE FOR WATER USE ‐ FOR THIS PROJECT AND OTHERS.  VOTE NO.   Hot off the presses just 3 hours ago.    https://www.sfchronicle.com/climate/article/California‐orders‐thousands‐of‐farms‐and‐cities‐17225970.php  California orders thousands of farms and cities, including San Francisco, to stop pumping water during drought  (msn.com)  The Coachella valley needs to re‐think ALL of our water use, not becoming the laughing stock.   VOTE NO.    Eve Castles 408.309.3705 2     On Apr 30, 2022, at 7:16 PM, Eve Castles <evecastles@gmail.com> wrote:    Dear La Quinta City Council Members ‐     I’m writing in opposition to the proposed Wave Park.      My husband and I moved to La Quinta in February, drawn by the quiet, low key vibe of South La  Quinta.  We were attracted to the quality of the people, the aesthetics, and amenities.  Early risers, we  were lulled into appreciation of the quiet, star‐filled nights.  We didn’t purchase a home in Palm Springs,  Palm Desert or any of the other cities with more ‘action’ for a reason.    Imagine our surprise when we discovered a Wave Park and resort might be moving in just over a mile  away from us.  And the amusement park would stay open until 10 pm every night?  HELP!!!  Do any of  you live within 2 miles of the proposed wave park?  If the answer is no, please think how you would feel  if the development were proposed in your neighborhood ….    We opposed the wave park development for several reasons:    1)  Light and noise pollution  (Let’s talk noise mitigation for a minute:  noise will bounce off of Coral  Mountain and go right over any retaining walls.  There was no mention of berms to absorb any sound).  2)  Too many short term vacation rentals  3)  Increased traffic down Madison and Monroe  4)  Water use inappropriate for our area.        PLEASE take a step back for a moment.  Does a wave park really belong in the desert?  The answer is  no.      PLEASE preserve our sense of quiet and peace in South La Quinta (said while listening to the StageCoach  concert 1.5 miles down the road in the other direction).    WATER is for drinking, bathing and use inside the house.  We need to shift our paradigm view of water  and water use!  Start with this project and vote NO!    Thank you for listening.    Eve Castles      Eve and Wes Castles  81705 Brown Deer Park  La Quinta CA 92253        SIDE NOTE:    As a landscape designer, I see lots of areas for improvements of water use in the Coachella  Valley.  Water is a scarce resource for California and is becoming even more so.  Growing up in the SF  Bay Area, I lived close to cities like Palo Alto, Los Altos, Redwood City ‐ all named for their stately  3 redwoods.  Our annual rainfall was typically between 18‐22 inches of rain.  Since 2010, the average  rainfall in the San Jose area has been 8.6 inches per year.  Eight of every 10 redwoods is declining or  dead at the lower elevations.  The temperatures are too hot and there is not enough water for them to  survive.  It is painful to watch the number of other trees, also in decline.          Eve Castles 408.309.3705 Landscape Design & Outdoor Living Find me on Houzz           From:Scott Connelly To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written comment for June 7 Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 5:52:56 PM Attachments:Coral Mt Wave Surf Park2.pdf ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Agenda item 1 Re: Coral Mountain Wave Park Proposal Listen to your residents. There is major opposition from residents and those concerned about protecting the integrity of our fragile desert environment and limited water supply. Water agencies certify the availability of water based on assumptions which include continued supply of water and reduced consumption due to conservation. Reality: the supply is diminishing and senior water rights could be changed. Consumers are using more and not conserving. Why are we being asked to cutback and conserve if there is no shortage? Major developers are offering up water-themed projects in this parched desert region like there’s no tomorrow, even as a prolonged drought continues across the Southwest, and the Colorado River reservoirs that replenish area water supply dip to historic lows. This property has critical environmental resources and habitat for the local flora and fauna. Please consider the consequences of how it will adversely affect the environment and our quality of life. One of the hardest challenges about of being a human being is balancing our altruism and our avarice and looking at a landscape in terms of what it does for our pocketbooks, rather than what it does for our hearts and souls. If you look at this magnificent landscape that you're proposing to develop, it is truly the art of millions of years of changes. And who wants to destroy that art piece? Not me. Behold the Beauty. I urge you to not approve this ill-conceived project. Thank you for your consideration of this matter of mutual concern. Scott Connelly Palm Springs CA 760-324-5001 Re: Coral Mountain Wave Park Proposal Listen to your residents. There is major opposition from residents and those concerned about protecting the integrity of our fragile desert environment and limited water supply. Water agencies certify the availability of water based on assumptions which include continued supply of water and reduced consumption due to conservation. Reality: the supply is diminishing and senior water rights could be changed. Consumers are using more and not conserving. Why are we being asked to cutback and conserve if there is no shortage? Major developers are offering up water-themed projects in this parched desert region like there’s no tomorrow, even as a prolonged drought continues across the Southwest, and the Colorado River reservoirs that replenish area water supply dip to historic lows. This property has critical environmental resources and habitat for the local flora and fauna. Please consider the consequences of how it will adversely affect the environment and our quality of life. One of the hardest challenges about of being a human being is balancing our altruism and our avarice and looking at a landscape in terms of what it does for our pocketbooks, rather than what it does for our hearts and souls. If you look at this magnificent landscape that you're proposing to develop, it is truly the art of millions of years of changes. And who wants to destroy that art piece? Not me. Behold the Beauty. I urge you to not approve this ill-conceived project. Thank you for your consideration of this matter of mutual concern. Scott Connelly 1 From:Alena Callimanis <acallimanis@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 7:21 PM To:Richard Dale; Monika Radeva; Laurie McGinley Subject:We would like to submit this as part of the Public Agenda for Coral Mountain Surf Resort Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** THE STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL BY THE COUNCIL IS OUTRAGEOUS!. IT IS A REVERSE TAKING OF LAND THAT IS SIMILAR TO AFFIRMATIVE IMMINENT DOMAIN WHEREIN THE CITY GIVES IT AN APPROVAL FOR FINANCIAL GAIN TO THE CITY AND ERODING OUR RIGHTS AS HOMEOWNERS TO QUIET ENJOYMENT OF OUR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY! WE WILL HAVE MORE TRAFFIC, MORE POLLUTION, MORE NOISE, MORE CRIME! THIS PROJECT IS HORRIBLE AND IT NOT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE PROPERTY, SUCH AS A PUBLIC DESERT PARK! IT IS THE WRONG PROJECT IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME. THE CITY IS IN A BUDGET SURPLUS AND THE EXTRA FUNDS ARE REALLY NOT NEEDED! WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOR LA QUINTA HAD TO 2035, THAT WAS BASICALLY ABOLISHED! ALL IS WRONG TO PROCEED ON SUCH A PROJECT. IF THE APPROVAL COMES, THEN A BALLOT ISSUE OR REFERENDUM NEEDS TO GO FORWARD BY VOTE OF THE COMMUNITY TO BLOCK TO PROJECT! THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE LOCATION IN THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA, DO NOT WANT THIS NUISANCE AND EYESORE! ANYWAY, THESE ARE MY OPINIONS. REGARDS, RICHARD G. DALE,JD. 1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:31 AM To:angie lafferty Cc:Consulting Planner; Monika Radeva; Laurie McGinley; Tania Flores Subject:Lafferty, Angie: 2022-06-07 Written Comments PH 1 Coral Mountain Resort Good morning, The written public comments provided via your email below will be provided to the City Council at the 6/7/2022 regular meeting and will be included in the public record for the meeting for the Coral Mountain Resort project. Thank you. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: angie lafferty <angielafferty1901@gmail.com>   Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:28 AM  To: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez  <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: Thank you in advance  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  If you can add it to the comments for the Coral Mountain project as well, that would be great.  On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:16 AM Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Thank you. We will include these comments in both project files for the Crossings and Troutdale projects.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: angie lafferty <angielafferty1901@gmail.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:14 AM  To: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Steve  Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; Tania Flores  <tflores@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Re: Thank you in advance   2 ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **    Hello Nicole,   Yes it is.  Thank you    On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:13 AM Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> wrote:  Ms. Lafferty,    Thank you for your comments. I know that you have been actively following the projects at Avenue 50 and  Washington Street. Is it as it relates to those projects that you submit this information?    Nicole    Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: angie lafferty <angielafferty1901@gmail.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:03 AM  To: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Carlos Flores <cflores@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans  <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>;  Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Thank you in advance      ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **    Dear Council Members and Members of the Planning Division,   Please take a couple of minutes out of your busy schedule to read the following article:  https://www.theguardian.com/us‐news/2022/jan/27/phoenix‐arizona‐hottest‐city‐cooling‐technologies  Let's learn from Phoenix's mistakes and better prepare for a hotter Coachella Valley.  Thank you for your time,  Angie Lafferty        1 From:Alena Callimanis <acallimanis@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:37 PM To:Monika Radeva Cc:Consulting Planner Subject:Monika, opposing comments from Petition Signers for Coral Mountain Surf Resort Attachments:Reasons SAY NO TO CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Monika, we are providing you a 100 page document for entry into the public record, with comments from people who signed our Survey Monkey petition opposing the Coral Mountain Surf Resort. Please see the attached referenced document. Respectfully, Alena Callimanis La Quinta Residents for Responsible Development 81469 Rustic Canyon Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253 919 606-6164 Reasons Provided By Area Residents As To Why They Signed the SAY NO… TO CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT! Petition At: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/72BVMV5 We should not be wasting our valuable water resources on a surfing amusement park. Also,  The noise from the  parks speaker system will reverberate off of the mountain and disrupt the neighboring communities.   The  zoning should be left as a low density residential housing.  When California is in a drought situation and climate change is making this worse, adding a huge water waste  resort is foolish and not responsible.  Main reason we live where we live, Trilogy La Quinta is for the tranquil surroundings. We enjoy the dark skies,  rural feeling of this area of La Quinta. This project totally ruins this ambiance. So many people in our area don't  want this. Does the City Council care about the desires of it's La Quinta residents. I hope so!!! Ridiculus waste of water! We are in a severe drought and you’re going to limit our water to use for this resort.  In this critical time of climate change and given the state of the severe drought we are experiencing it would be  absurd to put in a surf park. The amount of water used and lost is a waste of a resource that is quickly becoming  precious.  Where do they think the water is going to come from as we are going towards a drought. You need to put a  wave park on the other side of the 10 where it won’t bother homeowners. It doesn’t need to be by us plus the  fact we don’t want to  hear the noise And the traffic. Please do not approve this project.  TOO many homes, too many people, too much night time light, and such a  waste of water in this time of severe drought. Unconscionable waste of a very precious resource. Drought in California. It’s so hot in the summer, who are they fooling no one is going to use it when it’s 120. I  feel this project is a waste of money. We are in the worst drought in the last 120 years! Noise pollution, aquifer depletion, dark sky loss, noise effect on endangered sheep. Inviting the WAVE to go bankrupt and leaving behind an eyesore for the residents and a place for the homeless  hide out and a breed ground rodent's! Due to the ongoing drought, it makes absolutely no sense to approve such an egregious waste of potable water  which will have to come from the water source that provides potable water to every home and business in the  Coachella Valley. Coral Mountain Resort does NOT belong here in the desert!!!! Water use is excessive especially when water is limited in our Valley, and in CA.  There is nothing good about  this project as far as I can see.  Water conservation. This doesn't belong in a residential neighborhood. Traffic, WATER USE IN A DROUGHT, number of short term rentals, lights,   There shouldn't be any question ass to why this is opposed.  SURF..Desert...oh please.  We are in a  drought..what else is there to say.  and No I don't believe for an instant that the WAVE would not use valuable  water resources.  Silverrock is a damn good example of water waste. Reasoning is such a scam to do something like that .   We don’t need more unnecessary water usage in the desert.  The water crisis in the southwest is extreme. Lake Powell is at an all time low and the DOI is concerned about  the rivers ability to provide water and power to the region in the next 12 months. The greed of developers does  not consider the climate crisis we are faced with and only cares about profit and not the livability of the valley.  We need to stop with this reckless development. This project will not only impact the residents of La Quinta, but also those of us who live and work in the  Coachella Valley.  It is wrong on so many levels:  1.  It will use water from a shared aquifer.  There is no  guarantee that there is 20 years’ of groundwater, no snowpack replenishing the groundwater, and the Colorado  river allocations are being reduced.  How can you justify the use of water for the entertainment of a few when  residents  are required to reduce water usage?  Will resort visitors be asked to limit their showers?  Remember,  every drop counts.  2. The project will require massive amounts of energy.  Will the resort and wave machine be  asked to cut their usage during peak hours as we are asked to do?  Will resort visitors be asked to limit their use  of air conditioning during peak hours as we are asked to do?  Will the resort continue business as usual during  brownouts?  3.  The environmental impact will be significant, despite what your EIR states ‐ this is common  sense.  The stadium lighting is truly frightening.  4.  The jobs will most likely be the same level of jobs as at all the  other resorts in the Valley.  Will these workers make a living wage in order to afford a home in the community ‐  or anywhere for that matter?  Will these jobs provide benefits?  5.  The project will benefit a select and elite   population.  Explain why the residents and workers of Coachella Valley are asked to sacrifice precious resources  in order for people to be entertained at this resort and wave park?  6.  How many surf/wave parks can the  Valley support during an historic drought?  Explain to the people of California at large, the farmers, the ranchers,  the dialysis clinics and the hospitals why this project is a good idea.   This project is an affront to residents across  the Coachella Valley.  I urge you to vote “No.” Water/Lights/Traffic/Change in La Quinta Development Plan.  I can be more specific, but if anyone doesn't  understand these concerns they are not tuned in and they haven't read the news, both local and National.   Please stop this ridiculous development. WE NEED OUR WATER FOR DRINKING AND FOR OUR PLANTS, NOT FOR SURFING IN THE DESERT! STOP THIS  PROJECT! An amusement park located next to a retirement community, zoned for the last 20 years as residential low  density is just wrong, and unfair to the current residents.  Not to mention the fact we are in a historic drought,  and our city leaders are even considering a private wave water waster. Just wrong wrong wrong. La Quinta is a premier residential community, not a tourist destination.  Do not change this what made La  Quinta a great place to live! Due to the severe drought conditions it is unconscionable to approve a private water park facility that wastes  beyond billions and billions of gallons water, squandering such a precious resource is catastrophic. How much  water will be wasted accumulatively over the next ten, twenty or thirty years? Not to mention the magnitude of  water use will will cause residential water prices to skyrocket because there will less water availability. Not to  mention the number of short term vacation rentals will bring numerous problems and affect residential home  values in a negative way. La Quinta is an upscale small city and it is in the best interest of all to preserve it as one  with responsible environmental building. Water use is unconscionable.  Light pollution and noise pollution are also important factors.  Changing zoning is  a taking from the people who live around it and requires monetary compensation if it goes forward. No matter what they say, the project will use millions of gallons of water more than current use.  It is prudent to  wait at least a few years to see how this drought works out.  If it continues we will be happy this project was  stopped. If the rain cycles change you can always do it then. This is not the place for a WAVE pool.  Too much noise, traffic & pollution. I am concerned with the increased traffic and transitional population/vacationers for our permanent residence. A surf park in our desert is fundamentally wrong. It will steal water from our aquifer that cannot be replenished  from a drying up Colorado River. Please do not believe CVWD on this. We are in a drought, why come to the desert when the ocean is 2hrs away,  the planned area is beautiful how it  is the mountains have history  we don’t need the traffic  Building an artificial surf park in the desert is a totally inappropriate use, and a waste of, our limited water  resources, during a period of unprecedented drought. We’re living in one of the worst droughts.  Not one good reason to end this madness once and for ALL We shouldn’t even have to consider this ridiculous and appalling “development” at Coral mountain. The idea of  a large wave park resort in that pristine mountain area as well  as a total disregard for Californias dire water  situation is greedy and thoughtless. La Quinta already has the Talus development going up which will bring in  plenty of extra revenue for the City. Not to mention the added traffic on Madison‐and the lights and noise that  will most definitely affect the existing communities surrounding that property.  We are about to restrict water use in our homes.  This will evaporate more water in a day than I use in a year.   The traffic will prevent normal access to our area and slow the emergency response time.  This could cause  unnecessary  deaths. There's a drought. WHY is the project even being considered.  This is a waste of water as we are being asked to conserve. It's not just the water for the wave pool but also the  entire develpment.  It will increase congestion in our area already threatened by the Talea development just a  few miles away.    This is all about greed and money and not in the best interest of our community.  This is a waste of water as we are being asked to conserve. It's not just the water for the wave pool but also the  entire develpment.  It will increase congestion in our area already threatened by the Talea development just a  few miles away.    This is all about greed and money and not in the best interest of our community.  Concerned about the CA drought, water rationing, Lake Mead at 30% of capacity, which means this is the wrong  project at the wrong time Very concerned about the CA drought and water rationing for several counties, and Lake Mead at 30% of  capacity. This  is the wrong project at the wrong time. This project is an unnecessary waste of two critical resources that are already in short supply ‐ Water and  Electricity.  Additionally, it will create unplanned traffic in this far end of  La Quinta.   The development is completely opposite of the type of development that would maintain La Quinta's drawing  point‐ it's relaxed, quiet not‐so‐busy place for persons and families to visit and for our residents to enjoy.  The  development will take precious water from our city and it's residents and is blatently an attempt by wealthy  developers to make significant profits at the expense of changing our environment. If home owners are required to water rationing/reduction to supply a wave park  it is time to sell and find a  community that think of its homeowners first. We do not need anything like this in the Coachella Valley, especially in La Quinta.  We are a residential  community.  We do not need more traffic, stadium lights or lack of respect for water conservation.  This project  adds nothing to our community, just a few privileged bringing a different attitude that we need. We purchased our home because the property on 58th St & Madison was zoned residential, and it was our  objective to live in a residential not resort area. It is unconscionable to those of us who consider this our home  that the city would change zoning ‐ bait & switch. We should not let development 'at any cost' override the  quality of life that we have and want in LaQuinta. We were impressed when we decided to live in LaQuinta that,  unlike the other desert cities, the city preserved its neighborhoods and therefore the community feeling.  Largely, commercial areas were kept toward Hwy111 or dispersed into "village" like areas. Now this thoughtful  planning and quality of life will be eradicated. This would be the 3rd wave project in the desert ‐ how many  waves do we need in the desert? I watched a "60 Minutes" segment on preserving Fogo Island in Canada. I think  the interviewer asked a question the Council should think about. Question: "What's your response to the  capitalist who would say, why are you limiting your growth? Answer: That is the techno‐economic question. But  I start with a different question. What are we optimizing for? We are optimizing for place. We're optimizing for  community."  I hope that is the same answer that our City Council would give. Even if you really convince  yourself that this is not an environmental contradiction to our city and state objectives, there is still no way one  can rationalize this project as good for 'community'. Please keep residential zoning for Coral Mountain.   I agree, it's a terrible idea! I have been against this project since the beginning,  The La Quinta City Council should be ashamed of their  selves, It is always about money.   Increased traffic, noise pollution, continuous water waste,  electricity waste, light pollution, negative impact  on  natural & biological resources, dwindle acquifer & Colorado River Canal Supplies A never‐ending cycle of sporting events and other “party festival‐like” attractions does not belong in a zone  established for sublime and tranquil residential living. I'm concerned about traffic, noise, lights, increase in crime, water usage, property values falling, stress on the  cities infrastructure, and a extra burden on fire, police, and emergency services. La Quinta’s character of longer term leases and owner occupancy will be lost to the traffic, noise and lights.  Water waste and air pollution NOT needed either! No to the Surf Park.  We came here to get away from Crowds, Noise, Graffiti, and we came here because it is so  peaceful. We have a water shortage and we don’t need to to build or create another way to use up the resources   I live in a community very close to the project.  With concerns with drought in this state, how does this appear  to others, such as farmers in central California who are being asked to limit which crops they can grow, and  others currently being asked to conserve water.  We settled here for the peace, quiet, and beauty of the area.   Have you ever been to a water park?  There is a reason that they have been built away from residential areas.   The noise and the vibration.  We are concerned about wildlife, and rightly so. Concessions are being given to  them in the final EIR.  What about us?  Noise measurements were taken in 10 areas, none into the community  of Trilogy.  Why?  I think the developers know how significant the impact will be there. It will certainly affect  other communities nearby as well with increased traffic. And the 4 mini Coachellas we can anticipate? The same  individual who manages noise at Coachella tells us that the sound of machinery to power the wave will only be  at 65dB.  Convenient.  What about the other ambient noise?  Is this in keeping with demographics of the  surrounding communities.?  I think, like us, a largely older population, who came  for the beauty, peace, and  quiet.  We never anticipated such a project in our backyard.  Did we expect future development near us?   Certainly, but an amusement park for surfers, running from 7 in the morning to 10 at night, with 17‐ 80 foot tall  lights, and not accessible to others ?  Can anyone honestly say this is in keeping with the general plan?  What  made La Quinta the "Gem of the Desert"?  It's people like ourselves  who have supported you and contributed  to your growth.  Don't we deserve some consideration?  I would just ask that common sense prevail here.   I bought here for peace and quiet. Not busy crowded roads like Orange County. We are in a DROUGHT!! Plus we do NOT need to waste our land in our BEAUTIFUL town with RIDICULOUS  PROJECTS like the WAVE & IT'S TOWN PROJECT!! I VOTE NO, NO, NO!!! For ALL the many reasons that have been stated and it would be the most undesirable project for this area of  the town. Wrong location. There are more suitable locations for this type of venue, particularly with the vacant land in the  North East Valley. In my opinion, this project would result in the waste of much needed water, which especially critical during this  time of drought and climate change.  The entire state of California, and much of the west coast has suffered  from a drought for many years, with no end in sight.  It would be irresponsible to promote a project that would  waste precious desert water.    Additionally, this project would increase greenhouses gases and therefore  intensify climate change. The project would also result in other negative effects, such as pollution and other  problems associated with increased numbers of people (vandalism, theft, etc.), loss of the beautiful scenic  views, and waste of electricity.  Please consider the needs of the entire Coachella Valley, and all of the residents  when you review this project.  Please deny the Coral Mountain Resort rezoning as we need RESPONSIBLE  development, not development that would result in the serious problems listed above.  Thank you for your time. Having a wave park in this desert with a drought going on is ridiculous!!!  to save our very limited water supply for residents and the natural world rather than for a water park Excessive use of water so much needed here already for other purposes is my primary concern.  This is also  followed by the drain on electrical resources, plus the effect on scenic views and wildlife havitats. Sends the wrong message about the importance of water conservancy. Projects like this send the wrong message concerning community focus on water conservation. 100% against allowing an amusement park / resort of this magnitude in a quiet residential community.   Irresponsible in the time of historic drought to move to construct a 24 million gallon a year wave pool.  We need  to step back and look at water use in the Coachella Valley in a responsible manner.  Start now and vote not on  this project.   Google Colorado River.  ALL of our water comes from the Colorado River.  Don't prioritize elitist  recreation at the price of water coming out of our tap.   I have lived in the desert my entire life and see it changing into an LA suburb. We should keep the desert pristine  and full of the solitude that attracts people. Building on every corner and attractions to keep people busy is not  the highlight. Nature is the highlight.  Common sense tells me that a water park in the desert during the worst drought in state history is STUPID!! It will destroy the nature of this community.  It will destroy the dark skies.  Water is sparse why does the city  want to waste it? California is in the most severe drought in history.  A wave pool blatantly ignores this climate change emergency. It's a HUGE waste of water. The traffic on Madison is already heavy and it is difficult at times to cross Madison from our community and  exit. The added traffic alone from this project will negatively affect our area. Water shortages and restrictions loom.  We don't need a wave park that will take more of our precious water. This is a desert community. The entire state is suffering from drought. Shameful waste of precious water. We are being asked to conserve  on water and be assigned to restricted watering days, so how can you account  for this excess use of water?   Water shortage Wrong project for this area not to mention the waste of our water but also the light, noise and traffic pollution  wrong for this peaceful residential area. It is crazy to think to built and approve a water park of any kind here in the Desert when the whole state of  California is going through a drought. I plead to you to reconsider and wait until the State is no longer going  through a drought is it too much to ask....this will affect everyone.  Waste of water Agree with all of the above. Agree with all the above. Water depletion!!! Developer and local LaQuinta officials have no regard for the residents, for noise pollution, water consumption  or air pollution. We need to protect our aquifer and residents interests. Rather than develop something that brings in temporary  visitors with traffic, loud noise and wasteful water usage, the project developers should think about what the  local residents need. Water for future generations, affordable housing and jobs creation. This project not only will require a lot of power from IID, it will also use mega amounts of water. Plus the fact  that they want to build it as a rental community which will make it party central, I hope the city is willing to hire  more policemen. I think the fact that the city wants the revenue has blinded them to the facts. Water Waste in a time of Water concerns, Cost of running this extravagant resort. Overcrowding a community  that has limited access. Very irresponsible decision the Mayor should  know people do not want this Activity  Park put in to our lovely Quaint community.  This is not progress.    Traffic, noise from more traffic, too much use of water. We are in a severe drought with the situation worsening each year.  They will be taking water from the aquifers  and Colorado River, not potable water. We own a home in beautiful Laquinta. I don’t understand how this wave project could even be considered here  with our long term drought issues! Our property values will decrease overtime due to increased traffic, Noise,  trash in the streets and lack of precious water. We need to clean up the toxic Salton Sea disaster before  diverting more water to recreational pursuits. Please stop the wave project before it’s too late. This is another way for greedy people to make money, at the expense of "we the people".  We will be water  rationed even more than we are now.  There are miles and miles of free surfable coastline in California and  around the World.  Other surf parks are becoming obsolete.  The whole idea for a surf park in La Quinta goes  against the sophisticated image that La Quinta projects.  We don't want a Carnival image of our beautiful La  There has and will be water rationing again.  Surf parks have certainly failed elsewhere, and it will be throwing  away money for the build, and will hurt the residents of La Quinta.  We are  hours from a real beach.  It would  never last out here and I do not want to suffer my water being rationed, especially with the taxes we already  Each Citizen of the City of La Quinta have been asked to be more cognizant about our families water usage or  face large fines for any excess usage as determined by State, County and Local regulations that do nothing but  become a financial burden on our residents.     Why allow Big business' to move in to town and blatantly abuse  our precious water resources? If they really wish to move forward with this project it should be considered for  another part of the Coachella Valley.      Should this project be irresponsibly moved forward then, all La Quintas  residents should have their complete, monthly water bills paid by the developers and then by the Corporations  that own and operate these parks on a daily basis. Fining our residents for excess water usage would be criminal  should the City Council "APPROVE"  This project will destroy the quality of life in our area of La Quinta! To protect the environment & save water during a drought. When citizens & homeowners are expected to  adhere to restrictions on water use, the privileged few shouldn’t ruin it for all of us  The Coachella Valley is in a constant state of drought. Regardless of technology, this proposal and the wanton  waste of water use is unsupportable. Please deny this application in this form. There are severe water shortages in the west and this is a completely  irresponsible way to manage what little  water is in the desert. Think long term, not short term tax basis. If the water is gone then no one can ever live in  this area. There is much concern about the water shortage in the desert.  This is a very irresponsible addition to the  community.  A wave park is an irresponsible use of water. The southwest is in the midst of a severe drought. Dryist year in 1200 years. Hello? I've been a desert resident most of my life. I've owned my home in La Quinta for over 27 years. This kind of  project DOES NOT belong in La Quinta let alone the Coachella Valley. We are facing MAJOR Climate Changes all  over the world. The desert temperatures reach over 120 degrees every summer. This is a complete and total  WASTE of WATER!!!! Not to mention disrupting the peace and tranquility of the La Quinta community for a  Private Resort. This type of project SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY!!!!!!!!!!! La Quinta Palm Desert‐we have serious water issues already and a resort requiring this volume of water is not sustainable  Palm Desert. Water restrictions and increased costs imposed upon residents already. Make the  developer sign a  50+ yr commit and fund a water bond to get ‘skin in the game’ and leave Coachella better than it will impact the  valley.  Please save the water for those who live and work In Coachella. For now and the future. Madison is loud enough with racing cars!  La Quinta would be hurt by this wave park because of traffic, more  STRs and scientifically, it is not a wise addition to our community .  A total waster of water. Madison is loud enough with racing cars!  La Quinta would be hurt by this wave park because of traffic, more  STRs and scientifically, it is not a wise addition to our community .  A total waster of water. Global warming major water drought now is not the time to proceed with the development.  As civic leaders  please reconsider your support for this project.  The dominio affect of the drought will be felt for many years to  come.  What we really need is affordable housing for the residents already here.  Think responsible it’s can’t  always be about the money.  The city has done well let’s just stay on track and think about us already living here.   Irresponsible water use; why does the desert need potentially 4 surf parks; dislike the potential short‐term lease  factor; loss of open spaces. We're all supposed to reduce our use of our dwindling supply of water.  Will this project help to deal with the  oncoming crisis?  Obviously not.  This is sheer stupidity!! Irresponsible use of our dwindling water supply.  Not enough resourse to support all these new residents and  visitors. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE WATER WE DO NOT HAVE TO WASTE.  THERE IS NO FINANCIAL GAIN TO THE  COMMUNITY.  WE DO NOT NEED THIS PROJECT THIS PROJECT WILL NOT BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY.  WE ARE IN A CRITICAL DROUGHT CYCLE.  THIS IS A WASTE  OF VALUABLE WATER.  WE DO NOT NEED A WAVE PARK.  PERIOD. It’s unconscionable at a time where we going to be water rationing that a water wave park is even being  considered. It is absurd to allow a wave park to be built when there is such a severe water shortage. A huge waste of precious water.  Our location is a desert.  Who will give us water when all have none? This will deplete our water supplies, strain our electricity, and bring too many people which will burden our  community.  Water use rules that are in place already. The use of water we don't have enough to spare is thoughtless. The noise and lights are something we don't  want in our quiet desert environment. The traffic that will come during building and occupancy of this project is  unwelcome. !!   This is not the time or place for this kind of development for all the afore mentioned reasons. I vehemently  object to this project as a consiencius human being and as a concerned resident of Trilogy at LQ. With the state experiencing severe drought related water shortages and an ever increasing demand on an  already strained electrical grid makes one juestion the judgment and ethics and short sighted vision of any  group pushing this project, what were they thinking or were they just looking at the fees they would collect for  backing a project such as this here an now isn't just wrong,it for lack of a better term is obscene.    With the state experiencing severe drought related water shortages and an ever increasing demand on an  already strained electrical grid makes one juestion the judgment and ethics and short sighted vision of any  group pushing this project, what were they thinking or were they just looking at the fees they would collect for  backing a project such as this here an now isn't just wrong,it for lack of a better term is obscene.    We are in a drought, why would you even consider allowing a wave park to be built in this area.  We are concerned with wasting scarce desert water and electricity for a private surfing resort.  Also don't want  our peaceful area to be flooded with noise and light pollution, traffic jams, more special events that overcrowd  and bring about other problems. Not to mention climate impacts that this will bring about. Waste of water! No water park. Too much traffic and environmental strain. How can they say all that building will  not have an  impact This is a complete waste of vital water resources.  There is an ocean about 2 hours away where people can surf.  It is free without wasted resources. The waste of a precious resource,water! There is not enough water in the Coachella Valley for the residents who already live here; and we are already  too crowded, with Air B&Bs surrounding us.  This used to be a nice quiet village.  Now we have screaming  vacationers all around us.  We're being crowded out.  Take your greedy selves away from here.  There are  already too many like you here!  La Quinta ‐  I live in Trilogy by the berm where the noise, possibility of more people walking on the berm and  light pollution would be a definite bother. Not to mention the traffic and how this zoning change could affect  future development. Please say NO! I oppose the commercial rezoning for this project. I live in Trilogy and the traffic impact, noise and lights are  excessive. This project, WITHOUT the Commercial pleces and Surf Park is zoned for proper future development.   Wasteful, wonton goodie for the rich, not for the citizens. You should be ashamed.  As a resident of La Quinta City, I am against the development of a privatized recreation space, especially one  that uses water, a scarce public resource. I think it is unreasonable due to being under a severe drought for  years and it is expected to continue.  Besides that, this development and its events will enormously increase the  traffic in our city which has only two main exits.  This project is going to benefit the developers and a few  people, but not the whole community.   Our city manager and representatives should listen to the concerns of  all the la Quinta residents, not just the developers and affluent residents.   The city should have developed a  better, big public park for the recreation of the whole community.  Is that not going to create revenue for the  city?  Probably not enough, right?  that is why it has not been done.  I am also against the construction of so  many short‐term vacation rentals because that will contribute to more disruption in our city including heavy  I'm concerned about the unprecedented drought and inevitable water restrictions.  Without water, all that we  have becomes worthless.  It does not seem appropriate or conducive to the environment of such a beautiful, natural land. Noise and light  pollution. Increase greenhouse gases and climate impacts. It has already been zooned for the proper  I object because water is too precious to be used for this private project. Environmentally the proposed wave  pool is wrong!!! This would drain our aquifer and contribute to noise air and traffic pollution in an area already struggling with  these problems. This project is not compatible with our residential environment , and existing infrastructure will  not support this type of development. We are concerned about the unnecessary depletion of our water resources for the valley.  Keep the surfing at  the beach... it's not that far away.  This truly is the wrong project for our community...our town...our time. This project could easily move SOUTH,  to Indio or beyond. They want to build here because we have a wonderful, unique environment...so they wish to  cash in on what we built. Please, vote no. We must protect La Quinta ‐ it's a GEM now, but could easily become  a tin cup. Put us first, please Greenhouse gas impacts, light pollution, traffic, noise pollution, water waste during a drought, electricity waste,  and most of all, the destruction of the peace and beauty that is the nature of  La Quinta. Do we really want to  become another Anaheim?  NO!!!!  We live in a tranquil area.   The water consumption of 180,000 is to much when we need to conserve water. This  will be another Salton sea project that was a big deal at one time and now is nothing but smelly resort.  The  traffic will be too much as we have to deal with the Coachella Festival and Stage coach.   Please leave the valley  to how it is.   Surfers can go to Malibu beach or Hawaii. After 25 years in this desert I want to be able to drink & water plants not have aquifer drained for play. A native  Californian who lives in the desert & wants to keep it as a desert. I'm the meantime being asked to conserve my  water usage that can't compare to surfing needs. Please don't build this ridiculous waste of water. La Quinta  Because of what it will do to our water supply and the 80 ft tall light towers also the safety of our  community.  Noise light pollution destroying tranquility. Environmental impact and water use  Environmental impact water use in drought area  This is ludicrous. How short sighted and uneducated is this proposal!  Water!  We are asked to conserve, do it  naturally and willingly. Then our ‘leaders?’ entertain this idea. I’m overwhelmed  Very bad use of water.  Water for The but non for me attitude is very disappointing.  Don't come to us for more  reductions in use of water in the future. Very bad use of water.  Water for The but non for me attitude is very disappointing.  Don't come to us for more  reductions in use of water in the future. CA is in a drought. This venue will cause congestion to our area, water waste, electricity waste and huge  environmental devastation. Big dollars should not be the factor for this venue. No to this waste! I think doing a water project in the desert is simply wrong. I would be in favor of any project which is linked to  cleaning the salted sea, not adding another water park man made!  Water and electricity shortages  Wasting this much water should never be acceptable. This wave project is completely ridiculous and unnecessary in the context of California's continuing drought, and  it totally fails to take into account the reason we La Quinta residents have chosen to live in the desert in the first  as opposed to the Pacific Ocean/beach only a 2hr drive to the west! In addition, we are privileged to live near  the Anza‐Borrego desert which is designated as one of only 5 of the official dark sky areas in California, and any  source of night lighting with 80ft towers will impact this rare designation. Locally it will adversely affect our  beautiful evening darkness and quiet in the surrounding residential areas not to mention the disruption to the  local desert wildlife that depend on true desert conditions to survive. I do not believe this project is healthy for  human or animal life with the impractical use of land along with stealing from our PRECIOUS drinking water  aquafer in the desert ‐ it's absurd!  Our city council needs to act responsibly to preserve our community and  deny this project immediately! They are answerable to their constituency...  It is irresponsible to allow rezoning for a water park while we are in the midst of a severe drought. Considering the ongoing drought, this plan is ridiculous and criminal. Also the desert heat will cause lots of  evaporation which could actually affect the climate. If people want ocean‐like activities, they should go to a  beach community.    Waste of water. We are in a continuous drought and this is a desert. We are being asked to conserve water. It is  inconceivable that this type of project could even be considered  We’ve been told over and over that we’re in a massive drought ‐ it would be irresponsible to build this park until  we recover. Lake Powell is at a unprecedented low ‐ at least get it half full before approving this wast of water!  The amount of water required  for this project is obscene. The daily water evaporation projections alone make  the Wave Project untenable.  The stress on the below ground water resources will make for shortages long into  the future. By voting in favor of the Wave Project, those members of La Quinta City Council look seriously  suspicious and as if they are in the developers’ pocket. This project is completely wrongheaded. La Quinta is not  the right place or and this is absolutely the wrong time for such a waste of our most precious water resource.    Please consider the long term negative impact on our community and Vote No on The Wave Project. Thank you.  The amount of water required  for this project is obscene. The daily water evaporation projections alone make  the Wave Project untenable.  The stress on the below ground water resources will make for shortages long into  the future. By voting in favor of the Wave Project, those members of La Quinta City Council look seriously  suspicious and as if they are in the developers’ pocket. This project is completely wrongheaded. La Quinta is not  the right place or and this is absolutely the wrong time for such a waste of our most precious water resource.    Please consider the long term negative impact on our community and Vote No on The Wave Project. Thank you.  Its completely beyond stupidity... really... a private resort in our backyard to destroy our peace and quiet along  with all the wildlife around us. Let alone the huge environmental impact!!! But I'm guessing its all about the BIG  $$$ not peoples lives!!!! 1.Concerned that the water for the CMR will be taken from the aquifer below The Quarry at La Quinta, which  will result in water shortages to the Quarry, one of the country's premier golf course.  2. Concerned that there is  only one street access to The Quarry at La Quinta.  If the CMR is situated at the corner of 58th and Madison,  there will be days we cannot enter or leave our home at the Quarry.  It is clear that Indio doesn't have the  infrastructure to hose the CV Festivals.  La Quinta doesn't have the infrastructure for the CMR.   This is not a  good site for such a development.   1.Concerned that the water for the CMR will be taken from the aquifer below The Quarry at La Quinta, which  will result in water shortages to the Quarry, one of the country's premier golf course.  2. Concerned that there is  only one street access to The Quarry at La Quinta.  If the CMR is situated at the corner of 58th and Madison,  there will be days we cannot enter or leave our home at the Quarry.  It is clear that Indio doesn't have the  infrastructure to hose the CV Festivals.  La Quinta doesn't have the infrastructure for the CMR.   This is not a  good site for such a development.   Increased traffic.  Short term rentals are often abused by people who don’t respect the area.  Potential  increased crime.  Eliminates the charm of LaQuinta.   We live in the desert and water should not be wasted like the wave will do.   The usage of too much water. Light pollution, noise, possible short term rental and festival type problems, traffic, water and electricity waste.  Also concerned for possible flooding if something were to go wrong, ie earthquake or other issue causing  flooding problems I understand the City wants to bring in income through taxes etc.  This is the wrong project for continued  income for the City. A beautiful health spa w fine boutiques, stunning homes and golf course would be a  consistent revenue source as the client base for the spa and boutiques is already established w the surrounding  communities. La Quinta should maintain a luxury image that will produce more income by drawing in wealthier  clientele than stooping low to an amusement park venture that is wrong for all the various reasons that have  been previosly mentioned. There are several individuals who could purchase the land ‐ this is a no brainer. So  please jump out of the current would be developers back pockets, and do the right thing.   Best,    Carol Shaw Terrible idea in a beautiful and peaceful area.  How can the City Council even consider such a mis‐placed project.    i guess money talks.  I will support lawsuits going forward if this passes.    I agree that is not appropriate for the location or regarding issues of shortage of water resources. This planned resort for a surfing development is stupid and should not be allowed. Do not allow this to happen Totally inappropriate to re‐zone  this and mix use this in residential area  As a full time resident of La Quinta, I am in favor of responsible development that will benefit our community.  Coral Mountain Resort is not an example of responsible development.     My main concern for re‐zoning is the  extraordinary use of precious resources for a private venture that has no access or benefit to the local  community. It can only add pollution, in many forms, to the local environment. We don’t have enough water for farmers and it will only get worse. There is a water shortage!     My personal information is not for solicitation.  I am opposed to this project.  This is an issue if water.  This  project puts too much pressure on our water table and does not consider the environment.   This is a crazy idea....we're in a drought!  Not to mention why do we need another water park when there are 2‐ 3 others in the valley? We moved to La Quinta for the Beauty ,peace and quiet  not a waterpark.. The millions of gallons of wasted  water for this park is ridiculous. The noise that it’s going to make and the light should not be Allowed.A ton  more people that will be coming in trashing our neighborhoods. Please vote against this happening to us.  this is not appropriate for this area, and will affect environment and quality of life, not to mention waste of  WATER! And, destroying the beauty of the Coral Mountain (petroglyphs, "bathtub ring" on the mountain,  tranquility). With water such a precious resource and we are in a drought with no end in sight, it seems ridiculous to allow a  wave park that will use 18 million gallons of water. Please do not allow this.  With climate change and water shortages only worsening, it is not appropriate or wise to open and maintain the  water park  I'll keep it brief: this will waste water and electricity all for a Private Surfing Resort, Create Noise and Light  Pollution, Adversely Affect the Desert Climate, Reduce our "Gem of the Desert" into a crowded and wasteful  eyesore that will only serve as a cautionary tale of just how badly La Quinta got it wrong. Let's not become "that  kind of city." We can do much better than that. It’s an ill‐ advised, short sighted attack on our community, our desert ecosystem & our precious and limited  water resources.  Noise, traffic, lights and water conservation  This resort would change our quiet enjoyment of the area and why we purchased in the area. We always loved  the dark star filled nights and little traffic. This resort would completely destroy all of what we love about our  corner of the desert.  Do not want anymore development in our City. It will make more congestion and more traffic problems. Also a  wave park is more centered around a younger crowd. La Quinta is more of a retirement golfing community and  we don't need this kind of activity that doesn't pertain to the area. La Quinta is a nice quiet town and adding this  monstrosity on top of all the other new plans for building is changing it into something that will not be  enjoyable for the people who come here to live and get away from big city life. That is one of the most biggest waste of water and land, and peoples sanity I have ever heard.  Tell those young  grads with education, and no maturity or common sense to stop coming up with these hair brained ideas. I am against the change in zoning, wasting water we don’t have, disruption of nature, and the traffic.       I might have signed this petition before, months ago.  Not sure.  If I could I would sign it in opposition to that  Wavepark a million times more. I'm NOT anti‐growth. I'm against stupid, conspicuously consumptive growth.            For the private benefit of a few score of very rich surfers and the public benefit of a City naturally hungry for  tax revenues, the Planning Commission and the City of La Quinta seem poised to do the following:  1) to ignore  the screaming climatological and ecological indicators that there could hardly be a project More Wrong than  this one, at this place, at this time;  2) to pull a cynical "bait and switch" on opposed fellow La  Quintans by first  having promised them via Zoning Laws and the General Plan of 2035 NEVER  to do the very thing you NOW  seem to be seriously considering doing ‐‐ reneging on those very  promises:  "Sorry, fellow La Quintans, we  really didn't  mean what we said on paper there, and, well, you know, heh, heh, I mean, we're talkin' real money  here."   And 3): You seem poised, even after the outrage of that conflict‐of‐interest enabled and bought‐and‐ paid‐for joke of a DEIR ‐‐‐ and yes, even after the citizen avalanche of substantive  opposition letters and 3‐ minute  public presentations at a SERIES of City meetings ‐‐‐ you seem poised to allow yourselves to be  narcotized into consent not only by the great John Gamlin's unctuous (and time‐unlimited) reassurances but,  what is much worse, by the say‐anything (and time‐unlimited) hogwash responses to opposition points by the  Developer's legal counsel.            Please, don't let short‐term profit thinking ‐‐ your own or others' ‐‐ hook you  into making the wrong long‐term decision for La Quintans, for California, or for the Earth.   Very sincerely yours,   Wrong place It would waste our precious water and electricity which could cause unnecessary outages.  When I purchased my property 19 years ago, there was no talk of a future complete rethinking of the land use  on the books. My wife and I have owned property all over California and have never experienced this kind of  underhandedness by a government organization. With the constant media reminders of water shortages, how  are we even entertaining this project. I am a firm believer in allowing local governments to manage themselves,  but maybe the state needs to interviene on this one. I'd recommend passing this fiasco on to them. Most concerned about adding additional traffic to Madison as we live in PGA West. This is even more important  during festival season.  Waste of water and does not fit in in the Desert!! Stupid idea!! Are we trying to be all things to all people ??  please don't let this happen , we wish to keep LA QIINTA PEACEFUL..NOISE, WATER AN ELECTRIC WASTE,  NOT  CONDUSIVE HERE!  NO TO THE SURF PARK ITS JUST TOO MUCH WATER USED,NOISE POLLUTION..DESTROYS WHAT WEHAVE IN LA QUINTA Don’t approve this project…….we are facing terrible drought…..wrong thing to do!!!!! Influx of transients destroying our privacy. Drought conditions density increase noise. Lights. The proposal is  ridiculous.    I live off Madison and the traffic on that street is already busy and loud. This development will mostly use  Madison as access north and only make the street busier. We moved here for the quiet, and also for the dark  sky here, and we do not want the lights from this development to impact the current dark sky effect. We retired to Trilogy for the peaceful living....the water park will have a large impact in the environment  state wide water shortage‐‐stop the new building..fix the Salton sea before the environmental disaster. insane‐water shortage‐ I am disappointed that a project that wastes so much water is even being considered in our desert.  How is the  City of La Quinta and CVWD asking residents to conserve water while approving a project of this scope?  I have lived all over the Coachella Valley‐ Indio, Palm Desert, La Quinta… this project is a big mistake for the  desert!  We already use more than 25% of our water for golf courses!  We should be putting money into saving  the Salton Sea and thereby saving southern CA.  If you want to catch a wave, go to the beach.  Waste of water, energy, and resources for a private surfing resort.   Noise pollution, traffic jams, and light  pollution.   Destroy the peacefulness of the Coachella Valley. Waste of water, energy, and resources for a private surfing resort.   Noise pollution, traffic jams, and light  pollution.   Destroy the peacefulness of the Coachella Valley. Waste of water, energy, and resources for a private surfing resort.   Noise pollution, traffic jams, and light  pollution.   Destroy the peacefulness of the Coachella Valley. Waste of water, energy, and resources for a private surfing resort.   Noise pollution, traffic jams, and light  pollution.   Destroy the peacefulness of the Coachella Valley.   My major concern is water, in a desert environ that already has water shortages, the gratuitous use of precious  potable water resources for a recreational feature used by a limited group. Altering the master plan to fit a  project rather than designing the project to fit the plan is questionable methodology and while development  has many positives it should fit within the spirit and resources of the  community without detracting from it in  Save & protect aquifer  This is the most bizarre idea. Huge water waste. And dew point, humidity causing disgusting crowded idea. Waste of precious water needed for now and for future generations.  Does not belong in a residential area.  Not  enough infrastructure to accommodate the needs of so many short term visitors and the resulting auto traffic.  Etc, Etc, Etc. 18 million gallons of our DRINKING water!  Lake Mead and the Colorado River are at an all‐time low due to years  of severe drought.  This project is an unconscionable use of this precious resource.  This project exemplifies poor  stewardships of our land and limited water supply. We will be forced to leave La Quinta if this project is approved! So much for “The Gem of the Desert!! La Quinta.   Not needed, tremendous waste of resources 1 It not for the Public. This does NOT benefit La Quinta Residence at all. It's a rich man's playground. Don't use  valuable La Quinta water for other enjoyment. CREATE TOO MUCH TRAFFIC, NOISE, HARDSHIP FOR OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, WASTE OF WATER, NOT FOR  THE PUBLIC TO ENJOY. It will be a waste of valuable water and will increase traffic in the area. Low density residential/golf zoning  would have to be changed. Once that zoning change is made, it will be on the books forever.   I don’t want the zoning to change from low density to allow for the added traffic a resort use will generate. I live very close (a few hundred meters) to the intersection of Madison and 60th.  This development will expose  me to  light, noise, and traffic caused air pollution.  To add to that, development of water‐based recreational  attractions in the midst of a prolonged and worsening drought is unconscionable.  It is also clear evidence of the  improper influence of money in the local governmental zoning process.  What insanity! Please help protect our dwindling precious resources and think beyond immediate‐‐or even intermediate‐‐ revenue generation. Zones are established for logical, protective reasons and we degrade them at our own peril.  A wave pool doesn't make sense for this community at this time.  If ever in the desert.  La Quinta Too much additional traffic, noise, light pollution in a pro dominantly residential neighborhood. Possibly even  decreasing property values We live in Triology, wave pool with lights till 10pm next to a retirement community and the noise it brings along  with traffic is unacceptacle. An alluvial fan to a mountain belongs to its community & wildlife.  Enclosing and gating this for a few new  residents is selfish. I teach water conservation; & throwing big waves of water in the air in the middle of the dry  desert for recreation is quite far from conserving this precious resource. How will students discover and study  Salton Sea’s water line on Coral Mountain if forever handed over to tourists who don’t care for our valley?  Thanks for listening; I love the Coachella Valley where I have grown up and lived  for 50+ years.  I am concerned that the wave park will bring traffic, noise, crime, disturbance to wildlife and use too much  water,  too many short term rentals. How will Coachella residents save every drop of water so this exaggeration would have enough water, energy  and surfers to make this thing work well over time?  No way!!! An expensive boondoggle that will turn into an albatross burden for the citizens of La Quinta.  The project is  expensive, demands an exorbitant amount of electric energy, will waste far too many gallons of evaporated  potable water, and is not designed to have an operable business plan.  Too much, too wasteful, and too  imaginary for all of us in La Quinta.   We do not want all the noise and traffic. Water/drought. Noise/congestion. Vacation rentals    I am very concerned about the water issue. The A\Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival and Stagecoach add incredible traffic to our neighborhood,  having this monstrosity across the street is too much. Venture capitalists raping our beautiful desert for their  own greedy ends. Unfortunately once again Money Wins and Nature Loses  I agree that it is stupid to use our water in such a way. We can't water our lawns or get water in restaurants,  without asking for it. We are very careful not to let the water run from faucets. This kind of thing is  unconscionable! They are already clearing ground for it in Palm Springs! This is terrible! It makes me sick to think  about it.  Too much development.  We don't need yet another new hotel on top of the two at Silverock and even more  homes.    Also, the traffic and noise that would take place.  Having open spaces is still a plus to those who live in  the area and in a quiet environment and why we moved out here. This is not a good fit for the Coachella Valley.  It will waste water and does not does not fit in with our beautiful  desert resources.   Inappropriate use of scarce water resources  I'm a 30‐year resident of CA; 12 years in La Quinta, and 18 years in Palm Desert. As now Professor Emeritus in  Architecture, my career spanned 35 years with 12 years as co‐Chair of the Palm Desert Architecture  Commission, I've studied real estate development proposals of all kinds .during my professional career. I've also  served on elected Planning Boards and Conservation Commissions.    The Wave is an outrageous development  proposal considering the overall California drought. Other concerns, such as; noise pollution, excessive traffic,  and high‐density housing with 600 short‐term rentals should alarm the City of La Quinta.     The City should  outright DENY changing the Residential zoning for this project. This is a foolish idea for the following reasons:  Water usage waste will deplete to the point of declining property  value, climate change will deplete our water resources, poor management by the state to find other sources of  water will further turn the Coachella valley into a blighted area, highway and road infrastructure will not  tolerate the construction traffic. I am a permanent resident and do not want more transient traffic in my  We are in a drought. I have to cut my water usage and remove my lawn, plant desert scape to help my  community. I do not support this water waste! We are in the midst of a drought. We are in the desert. Why in heaven's name would we want to use water so  developers can make money, disrupt lives and screw over over the community where they most likely don't live.      We should not allow this project to go forward. Water waste, our IID power grids are already strained, traffic, zoning, and light pollution. La quinta should  remain a peaceful place for nature to thrive. Drought, the use of drinking water in a desert environment.  Commercial intrusion 24 hours a day in a  residential area.  No more beautiful dark desert skies which was the reason for choosing this area. there is only one Coral Mountain in the world!!!!! beautiful,symbolic!!!  low use residential,  golf course type  property,if even that,   should be the only development ever considered for this specific location(base of coral  mountain)!!!! the surf park development can be built in many many other locations and not have near the  negative impact as it would at the base of coral mountain! I believe that this projet will forever change the dynamics of this area of La Quinta. We live here for the dark  skies, peaceful tranquility and low traffic. Additionally with energy concerns and water consumption will add a  stress to the system and is environmentally detrimental. The added strain on emergency servcies will jeopardize  response times and stretch the Sheriff Dept. thin. I live adjacent to the proposed project and it would greatly and negatively impact my daily life. This kind of  project was never originally proposed by the Andalusia developing partners and is a desperate attempt to regain  their investment at the expense of everyone in the area, including there own Andalusia development. I disagree with this project due to the effect on our community. All the extra people coming in is very  concerning. Why waste our water and expose is to all the different impacts in our quiet community? Does not  make sense, I very much disagree.  I am most concerned about the negative environmental impacts created by this project.  Water and electricity  are scarce now.  This would waste those precious resources. The negative impact on the environment and the wasteful use of scarce resources, specifically water and  electricity, are the main reasons for my concern. The area is residential and should remain as such. This development is inappropriate for the area. I do not  support changing the zoning. With ongoing drought issues a surf/wave park is irresponsible. Basically, it is an inappropriate use of water in the desert. We have been enjoying the beauty and solitude of the Coachella Valley (spring flowers, Living Desert, Indian  Canyons) and surrounding desert (Joshua Tree N.P., Anza Borrego Desert S.P.) via weekend and vacation travel  for many years and decided to relocate to La Quinta when we retired 11 years ago for the things we didn't have  in the city: wonderful weather, minimal traffic, low noise, dark sky, many choices for entertainment and dining  close by, wildlife, hiking, unlimited photographic opportunities, etc., etc. We are highly concerned that building  the proposed resort will have a huge negative impact on all the reasons we moved here in the first place in  addition to throwing away many thousands of gallons of scarce drinking water that we cannot afford to waste  for the entertainment of a wealthy few. We are most definitely 100% against this or any similar project in South  La Quinta and want the City Council to deny rezoning.  I agree with all the reasons mentioned on the Say no to the wave card but most of all we are in a serious  I do not want our drinking water to be exploited. Everyone should have access to drinking water and I do not  believe filling up a wave pool for private surfing is a good use of our resources. La Quinta City Council members please do not approve the wave park.  I believe the noise, environmental issues  and the traffic will cause huge problems for residents of LaQuinta.   Dear La Quinta city council members please do not allow the wave park to destroy our beautiful city.  The  negative impact this park will bring will definitely be greater then any positive impact it would have.   The proposed project would be a waste of our precious water and create a lot of noise pollution.  Also there  seems to be a lot of environmental impacts not are not desired in our community.  Water is a resource that we have to be diligent with  A wave pool /surf park in the Desert in the midst of a long  term drought  is foolish and not necessary  We live in a desert in the state of California. Our drought issue is worsening to the point where the state has  restricted farmers' water usage during a pandemic when food shortages are already an issue.      It is  unreasonable to develop water features knowing that we currently do not have a solution to the worsening  drought issue. Our desert is seeing major increases in population and visitors, leading to greater water  consumption. It is unfair to ask locals, small businesses, and farmers to cut water usage while simultaneously  approving wasteful projects such as this surf pool.       Of all the creative people on this planet, there is no one  who can design an attraction that does not utilize excessive amounts of water?      I find it hard to believe this  surf park will draw in enough people to offset the number of angry residents. New projects should make sense  for the entire community. We are not opposed to fun, new projects, but this project is irresponsible. I talk to  many people within this community, and I have yet to meet someone who is happy or excited about this project.   How can anyone morally or ethically be ok with such a plan while all the taxpaying residents are continually  asked and expected to cut their water and power usage year afteryear.  With our resourses being stretched thin  more and more yearly, and this projects even get passed the 1st stage of request, makes me wonder who we  voted in office to take care of our city.  Very important to consider next voting time. Maybe some members are  being bought out. Not enough ethical people any more these days.  Some of us are a dying breed out here.  How can anyone morally or ethically be ok with such a plan while all the taxpaying residents are continually  asked and expected to cut their water and power usage year afteryear.  With our resourses being stretched thin  more and more yearly, and this projects even get passed the 1st stage of request, makes me wonder who we  voted in office to take care of our city.  Very important to consider next voting time. Maybe some members are  being bought out. Not enough ethical people any more these days.  Some of us are a dying breed out here.  We believe this project is totally unsuitable for the proposed location.  It's environmental impact is disgusting. We believe this project is totally unsuitable for the proposed location.  It's environmental impact is disgusting.  There are so many reasons this is a bad land project:  Out of Townes traffic!  Water waste, California has a  water shortage!!!  Destroying the view of our lovely mountains!  causing  many different types of pollution! My wife and I moved to Trilogy La Quinta 6 years ago from the San Francisco Bay Area seeking peace and quiet  and much less traffic. We fear the Wave Park will change all that regardless of what they say. We are so happy  living here and don't want to move again.  Please do not approve this project. We residents of the valley are constantly told we have a water shortage... that we need to conserve water!  Approving a water park of any kind makes NO sense at all!!! WHY should I cut back on my water usage IF a  water park in La Quinta is approved? Either we residents are being lied to or our La Quinta City Counsil is insane  to approve a business that will use massive amounts of our water. I am opposed to this project.  It would be very irresponsible for the planning commission and City Council to  approve this project.  Surf parks are not a success model and to allow a 13 football field hole to be built next to  our beautiful Coral Mountain is selfish.  We moved to The Quarry from PGA West because we wanted a more  peaceful and natural setting.  You will forever change this area (and we cant go back) if you allow this project to  move forward.   The last thing we need is a surfing resort ‐ water is a valuable commodity. My biggest concern is the waste of scarce water resources ‐ that's just crazy. this does NOT belong here TERRIBLE idea during a megadrought!!! We have been experiencing drought for several years now.  Our water resources are dwindling, now someone is  going to build a humungous surfing resort, that will waste water daily!  We, the residents, have been asked to  conserve water and electricity, while our City Council may give permission to a couple big companies to build a  facility that contradicts our conservation efforts.  And, the light pollution!  What happened to our "starry night"  ordinance?!?  We used to stargaze at the Corral Mountain area.  This project is going to completely destroy the  landscape of our beautiful La Quinta and the nature of our community.  Please deny the request for the zone  change.  Horrible use of precious water for a ridiculous entertainment venue! I don’t believe that you are taking seriously future water shortages.  The Colorado River was just elevated this  week to the most endangered river in the United States.  This is the wrong project in the wrong place.   This project belongs near I‐10, not in housing neighborhoods.  Im opposed to this development for many reasons and legitimate concerns, first there is a drought, this is a  wasteful use of water, especially when some residents can’t pay their water bill or have no water stall.  Second,  the lights that will be used to will negatively effects the wildlife in the area, not to mention the residents.  The  stars can be seen at night, it won’t be the case when there are so many lights.  The house disturbance to our  wildlife and our residents.  The traffic it will bring is horrendous.  We are fighting climate change and here the  city goes and destroys any chance.  Shame on you. I am a home owner in Trilogy.  My husband and I also built a home several years ago in Minnesota on a 140 acre  man‐made lake.  As one of the first residents, we moved in while the lake was still being created.  Its  incomprehensible to me that anyone would suggest there will be no problem with noise and traffic as we  witnessed it firsthand.  The large equipment needed and the construction workers traveling in and out. Not to  mention all the people in the short term rentals and hotel and the noise from the surf pool once up and running.    And to think this project will continue building out for over 20 years! My husband has been in real estate for 40  years.  There is no way that the value of homes in Trilogy and surrounding area will not be negatively impacted.   How do you think would be buyers will react when they see all the traffic and construction  and are told it will  be going on for over 20 years?? Haven't communities throughout the valley, including La Quinta, been  concerned with short term rentals and now you want to approve an additional 600?  The entire state of  California is suffering through another drought and we are being asked to conserve  water and you are going to  approve this surf park? I would urge members of the council to consider all these arguments as well as others  that have been presented, and vote no on this project. Ecology. This is the desert. Go to the beach to surf.  Water is precious and this a huge waste of drinking water.  We live just off of 58th street near the proposed wave park. I am very concerned about the noise, traffic and  general congestion in our quiet area. I feel that this would bring down the value of our homes in this area.  Please do not approve this travesty! We are experiencing global climate change. The Colorado river cannot sustain use forever. In the midst of a  drought, it is foolish to consider a wave park with high density traffic. I am a voting resident of La Quinta. Deny Coral Mountain Resort rezoning and apologize to the citizens of this  lovely community for even considering turning our present and future sources of drinking water into an  immensely gross corporate folly, increasing traffic, creating greenhouse gases and more light pollution, setting  the stage for future power outages, and decaying the natural peace and beauty of OUR community of private  citizen. We don't need the tax dollars, if that is your excuse for considering this ridiculously short sighted  political notion. Thank you, JamesG.   La Quinta will not change for the better with this private resort.  Traffic and noise will increase, water will be  wasted, it will require significant energy resources.  This will change the tranquil nature of La Quinta, a feature  which drew me to the city. This is not an area for water themed activities. Leave that for Florida!  Water will be an increasingly precious  resource.  Send it to the Salton Sea I am a resident adjacent to 58/Madison.  Keep zoning SFR!!!!! Save our water!!!! This will destroy our valley.  We are in a drought so why would this project even be considered?   The Wave is inappropriate in La Quinta. I think the Imperial Irrigation District calculations of water usage must  be based on the Wave in Lemoore which is situated out in wide open farmlands. Its website states "The hot  season lasts for 3.6 months, from June 3 to September 23, with an average daily high temperature above 89°F.  The hottest month of the year in Lemoore is July, with an average high of 98°F and low of 65°F." Not exactly like  us, would you say? And the Wave certainly does not belong in a quiet very high end residential area. I also  believe the Board and Planning Commission could be exposed to legal backlash costing the City and thereby its  residents unnecessary costs. Do you live near here? Probably not. Please be against the Wave ‐ vote with your  conscience, not your politics.  Thank you.                                                               I did not move to the La Quinta a quiet and tranquil residential area,  with dark skies, stop signs and minimal  traffic as I approach retirement to find out the city wants to rezone a residential area to a recreational one. I  don't oppose development, I oppose the irresponsibility in the approval of the proposed plans for The Coral  Mountain Resort and The Wave Park.  I understand you want the TOT revenue in the future ‐ but this is the  wrong location to change the zoning.  If passed the negative impact on the environment it will never be  reversed. We are in a severe drought with no end insight! There's a news report from April 18, 2022 on Channel  12 in Arizona ‐ Titled "Page, AZ facing major challenges as water levels at Lake Powell drop" ‐ States "shrinking  lake levels are threatening the tourist town's drinking water". ‐ Is this what you want to happen in our  community if City Council moves forward with this project!  Increase in traffic, fire/police resources will be  impacted in addition to noise level from "The Wave" machinery.  This past weekend was my first experience  with the first "Coachella Festival" ‐ I experienced first hand the noise/vibrations from the base music from the  band well after midnight on Sunday evening which kept me awake, (I had to go to work the next morning and I  was not at my best with minimal sleep.)  I don't want to experience this from the machinery for "The Wave" on  a nightly basis.  Please do not pass the zoning or the plans for The Wave at Coral Mountain.  We love this area due to the LACK of commercial activity, night light pollution, traffic congestion, and noise in  general.  This was and is the appeal of this area.  The many residents who willingly pay property taxes and care  about this community are not in favor of this significant change.  Please carefully reconsider agreeing to an  unknown and undesired project especially as inflation and concerns over water loom. All the reasons listed on the postcard It is irresponsible to use water resources when we are facing a drought. In addition, it disrupts our quiet,  tranquil environment and displaces wildlife. It is irresponsible to use water resources when we are facing a drought. In addition, it disrupts our quiet,  tranquil environment and displaces wildlife. I am concerned for all the reasons listed on the postcard  I moved to Trilogy LQ to enjoy the quiet serene setting, the lack of traffic and street noise.  The night skies here  are beautiful and I am against the resort and wave pool going in to the area.  The zoning should remain  residential to be more in line with the surrounding community.      Our water is a Precious Resource...  Take this project closer to a lake or an ocean, not the middle of our desert!  I  don't care how many golf courses are here, there are here, we don't have to add to the madness. Our water is a Precious Resource...  Take this project closer to a lake or an ocean, not the middle of our desert!  I  don't care how many golf courses are here, there are here, we don't have to add to the madness. We don't need MORE Private resorts or anything that ALL CV residents can't participate in. La Quinta is a quiet, peaceful community.  We respectfully ask to remain a community that cares about people  instead of money. Also, water is a definite issue. water shortage, Colorado River can not support wasteful usuage. I oppose the proposal because of the light and noise pollution especially.  Also, communities all over California  are opposing  short term rentals due to the traffic and congestion it causes, not to mention nuisance complaints  with more people in the area that are not neighborhood oriented. Why diminish the quietude and serenity of the local community. Politicians will probably vote in favor for the  tax revenues this would generate and for whatever they can put in their pockets under the table from the  We have a nice residential community with more than enough hustle and bustle on the Hwy 111 corridor. The  last thing we need is to spread this congestion and noise to another site off the corridor. We are in a drought, and even if we were not, this is an irresponsible use of water.  There is already one of these  parks approved in Coachella Valley, why should there be another?  Increased water use, noise, traffic, and light  in the neighborhood are all reasons to NOT approve this plan. Where would the water come from?   I thought the entire southwest was in a drought and all of us are expected  to conserve water, so how does this fit in? Approving this project would go against the wishes of the majority of homeowners that would be adversely  affected.  Do what you were elected to do and look out for our interests. Vote no. This is a squandering of  precious water, electricity along with the quiet enjoyment of our properties. La Quinta is an area where full time residential families, professionals, and retirees have moved to stay out of  the hub‐bub, and "scene" of the western parts of the valley.  The recent development out here as already  drastically changed the full time residents (such as myself) quality of life.  We pay our taxes and keep our  properties updated and well‐maintained, we participate civicly, we have pride in our La Quinta Community that  is already suffering all season long from the concerts, tennis, and ongoing events.  This isn't SOLEY A RESORT  TOWN...PEOPLE LIVE HERE!  HAVE SOME RESPECT and don't put yet ANOTHER rental resort with the waterpark  eyesore in our community!  It's ENOUGH! This is not something that is needed or wanted in La Quinta.  It uses our natural resources and increases all the  “bad stuff” that isn’t needed in our community.  SAY NO TO THE WAVE!!! I am whole heartily against every aspect regarding this proposed change in zoning, and everything about this  project due to excess water usage, traffic, noise, light and transient usage. Moved to this southern part of La Quinta, due to less commercial lighting, so I can  use my telescope and study  the stars and their galaxies!   Please don’t ruin the sky with all the planned lighting in this development.  I will be moving into Andalusia in two years when my house is finished being built.  I chose Andalusia for its  peaceful location as my place to retire.  Having experienced Coachella concerts this year for the first time, I do  not want that traffic, noise, crowds etc. non‐stop year round.  I also am concerned about the massive use of  water in the desert.  All of us need to conserve and this is definitely not conservation. Traffic impact, water waste, and creating a new inconsistent lifestyle for La Quinta A water park during an extreme drought is the last thing we need.  Between the traffic and light pollution this  will create a toll on the Desert environment.  To bring that much traffic into an area where the residents  purchased high end homes for the quiet, peaceful   environment  that this type of resort will destroy. Also extreme use of water that is in short supply due to  drought conditions is not a smart move for any community.  We voted our City Council members into office to  look out for our best interests and hope they will reject this project as that is what IS in best for us. Thank you We will be directly affected by this project as backyard faces across Madison to the site.  We will be affected by  lighting and noise pollution  Please do not allow the building of this "white elephant" We will be directly affected by this project as backyard faces across Madison to the site.  We will be affected by  lighting and noise pollution  Please do not allow the building of this "white elephant" We will be directly affected by this project as backyard faces across Madison to the site.  We will be affected by  lighting and noise pollution  Please do not allow the building of this "white elephant" Please have the council read your mailer, I agree with all of the negative impacts to our community, city and  environment. I cant formulate one positive outcome except for more revenue and greed, if that's the deciding  factor to approve this project, than the city council needs to be recalled. I agree with every statement on your opposition card.  Noise, light pollution, traffic, inappropriate for the  community.   Concerned about traffic and noise pollution This type of commercialism is a water wasting project and will bring in crowds that we don’t want in the  LaQuinta community.  La Quinta is part of the desert region which is under drought conditions. Why use up water in such a huge  wasteful manner?  And during summer months there are already electricity shortages and outages.  La quinta  city council needs to remember who they represent and maintain the beautiful, peaceful, relaxing city and area  in which people chose to live . Overall traffic in the whole valley has gotten too congested from over development. We do not want this to  become another Orange county. However, the main factors for me are water and power. The Western US is in a  mega drought which damages farming  and power production at the dams. We need water to grow food for  farming. Our valley's precious water and power should not be wasted and potentially put at risk. We should not  max out our power grid or resources so that we have a cushion when there are problems. It is not a matter of  "if" but "when" with water and power problems. Living in the desert in the summer, this could potentially be life  threatening. The drought in California continues to get worse and there's no reason to believe it will improve in the future.  Climate change is real and we shouldn't waste our precious water. Please don't build this project! This wave pool is completely ridiculous the amount of water & electricity that will be used taking from residents  upping prices , the drought that’s so “bad” taking 18 million gallons is disgusting the only reason this would be  approved is corruption in those that govern us. Outrageous nobody wants this horrible wave pool  The points made in the opposition publication covers most of my concerns. I bought in LaQuinta to live in a  peaceful well maintained city. We are in a water shortage with no end in sight.  We have to watch our water useag. Let the desert be desert.   Go surfing where the real waves are.  1) wasting water!  2) locals are not the customer and don't benefit. Instead they pay the price of, water  consumption, scenic obstruction, noise pollution, TRAFFIC JAMS, and destroying the peaceful and untouched  desert.    Contact me if I can help; Brad Davis ph: 512‐745‐0461 With 5 developments in progress, the wave park adds additional strain to our infrastructure and precious  resources. Filling a 16.7 acre water basin for water sports in the middle of the desert is ludicrous. Not to  mention noise and additional traffic congestion will add to an already strained infrastructure. If generating  revenue is primary focus from STRs, then it’s wiser to reassess existing communities and provide them  That water park will NOT do any value for this community,    It sounds like the young men that graduated from  colllege with a degree and NO common sense We moved here for the peace and quite. Plus no traffic problems and dark night skies.     If the builders want  something like this, put it by the new hockey stadium off I‐10 and Cook St. To much traffic, will destroy the beauty of the mountains, waste of water the ocean is two hours away doesn’t  This is not the time during a drought for a surf resort in a already small desert resort community.  Adding to  pollution, traffic and overcrowded communities.  No short term rentals either.   Water Shortage! Drought! It’s crazy they ask us to watch our water usage but let them build the Wave? Beach is  2 hours away. It’s truly Crazy!!!!! My main concerns are water consumption, traffic, noise and light pollution. The only positive I see is tax  revenue and the quality of life clearly outways that.  My main concerns are water consumption, traffic, noise and light pollution. The only positive I see is tax  revenue and the quality of life clearly outways that.  I just seems that greed has overtaken every aspect of life these days and this is such a self centered project that  I find it hard to believe that city council is even looking at it. Families are finding it hard to live and buy here as it  is and I gather our school registration is down because of that and other factors. We love living in a multi level  family area and I think we have enough outside Festivals and money making functions to keep the coffers full.  This could turn out to be another white elephant in our lovely area! Never mind the environmental impact. The  light pollution alone would be catastrophic! And water use ???? Please send these folks to Arizona or elsewhere  where no doubt they will be welcomed with open arms. Thanks for your consideration 🙏 I just seems that greed has overtaken every aspect of life these days and this is such a self centered project that  I find it hard to believe that city council is even looking at it. Families are finding it hard to live and buy here as it  is and I gather our school registration is down because of that and other factors. We love living in a multi level  family area and I think we have enough outside Festivals and money making functions to keep the coffers full.  This could turn out to be another white elephant in our lovely area! Never mind the environmental impact. The  light pollution alone would be catastrophic! And water use ???? Please send these folks to Arizona or elsewhere  where no doubt they will be welcomed with open arms. Thanks for your consideration 🙏 This is an inappropriate area for such a Resort Development. It should be out by Route 10, visible from the  Freeway, not hidden out by 60th street ‐ when it fails financially we will be looking at the abandoned park  forever,  this is not smart. California is in a drought ‐ it does not make sense to add a wave park in this location because there is limited  water for drinking and other common water uses. It does not make sense to add a wave park when we might  not have enough water to drink, shower, or flush the toilet.  We should not take zone changes lightly. The existing zoning for this property was put in place for a reason. That  reason has not changed. I believe in property rights, but I also believe in adhering to current zoning. Not an approximate fit for a community of homes, retirement communities and agriculture. Heck, we don’t  even have retail. Our closest grocery is 10 minutes away. Why would we need a surf park?  It would be nuts to  rezone for something like that.  Environmentally very bad; horrible for the residents because of bright light, noise and traffic; an example of  damage to the many for the benefit of a few. Not right for our area. High water usage is built into this project! (ie. Excess Evaporation due to High air Temperatures and large  surface area of the wave pools). No justification by developer saying “Golf Courses do too”. OK, but most of that  Golf Courwater flows back into the Aquifier. A claim the Wave‐pool can’t make. I moved to Quinta 5 years ago to enjoy a beautiful, quiet retirement. I have seen this quiet community become  busier with  each passing year. La Quinta already has a good amount of events and attractions that bring in the  revenue needed to keep our city a wonderful place to live.  Please do not let private, for‐profit entities take  advantage of our beautiful, quiet place by invading La Quinta in order to plump up their bank accounts  when  they have absolutely no regard for our serious drought. That problem  should be uppermost in everyone’s mind.  (My neighbor received a threatening letter from the water department for hosing her sidewalk!  And she said  her record for water usage is rated “Excellent”.)    This project, besides the traffic, noise and lights, about which  many residents are concerned, will require an enormous amount of water taken from our already scarce supply.      I cannot understand how any City Council member could, with a clear conscience, approve any area in our city  or valley for re‐zoning to accommodate a project that will so grossly deplete our precious water resources.   Please do not vote to rezone the area to allow this project to adversely affect the residents of our great City of  Water is limited and already impacted by multiple golf courses, hotels, and gated communities with boating  waterways. It is arrogant and disrespectful to endlessly pump the aquifer to amuse the rich at the expense of  already established residents. I am concerned about the impact overall to our community and the irresponsibility relative to our water and  natural beauty.  Drought! Traffic! Light pollition! Stvr!  Do not approve this, this is not the place nor time. It is wrong to have to change the zoning to satisfy a development. The noise pollution and additional traffic will  destroy our very peaceful area. Too much water, ruin the neighborhood with traffic and light up the sky and noise. This borders on a criminal use of water at a time of water shortages and the climate emergency.  I'm also  concerned about the STVR impact on La Quinta. This will add huge traffic, noise and congestion problems to our city. It is totally wrong for La Quinta.  Water usage. We conserve but new resort won’t. Peaceful nature of our desert will be lost  This is an absolute, ridiculous use of scarce resources, especially during a mega drought. There is no way to  justify this project ‐ I don't care how much money it supposedly will bring in. We have enough development as‐ I typed all of my reasons, your system did not take Increased traffic, noise, crowds, wasted water, light pollution, and electricity usage. I live at 60th and Madison, do you know what this will do to my home value and traffic problems, plus do we  really need more hotels and housing , We are so over on construction in adding houses on 50th, 49th, 48th and  47th!!  I am so against these projects. It is not the same when I moved here 161/2 years ago, thank you  Under the best conditions our desert climate is hot and dry. Climate change is causing severe drought and  excessive heat and we can't afford to waste water. The state of California has already implemented water  restrictions. Building an exclusive surfing park that only benefits a few but has a negative  impact on everyone  isn't responsible government. Secondly, building in a residential area is also irresponsible. The noise, lights and  traffic again will benefit the members but negatively impact everyone in the surrounding neighborhoods. Please  Concerned about increased traffic, noise, crowds at limited grocery shopping in the area, light pollution, water  usage and electricity usage. This is definitely a bad location and will affect our area forever and is not what we bought into. With water  shortages in California now a bad time. I love living in La Quinta. I enjoy the peace and quiet living in Trilogy. No noise, no lights no traffic. Let's keep  that land for residential living! I Vote "No" to the City of La Quinta for the rezoning of the proposal for Coral Mountain Resort by Meriwether  Companies and Big Sky Wave Development.    During the music festivals held in the City of Indio, it is already  impossible to go in and out of La Quinta on our regular roads of travel because of the road blocks due to the  festivals. Adding more resort events of any kind would cause more traffic and travel problems.    Our water and  electricity is already stretched to the limit. it is absurd that the City of La Quinta would even consider another  resort at this time.  Especially one that would use a TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF OUR PRECIOUS WATER AND  ELECTRICITY! The City of La Quinta has already requested that the homeowners conserve water and electricity.  To add this resort would be hypocritical on the part of the City.  Our cost for water and electricity has already  increased and this resort would cause a further increase. There is no justification what‐so‐ever for the City of La  Quinta to approve this rezoning and resort.    With the hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants entering our  country over the past year, crime will go up at our expense, our taxes will go up to support subsidy of assistance  for these illegals, and to foot the bill for the crimes committed.    The City of La Quinta should NEVER even  consider approving this project due to the hardships we are already under with the impositions, mandates, and  increased costs. We should NEVER have to pay for these problems as homeowners and citizens.    This kind of  project should be located far away from any cities; somewhere like the Salton Sea that has "free" water and lots  of open land area.    MY VOTE IS "NO".     It will increase greenhouse gas, noise and light pollution  The project is irresponsible in an era of climate change and drought. We don’t need or want this type of  disruptive development.   Lots of seniors in this community city council members should not think on  being greedy and not think  about  the well being of their people, we already have so many venues where city of la quinta is benefiting like  coachella  fest , tennis events etc, greed is not the solution. Thank u very kindly for taking my concern. Lots of seniors in this community city council member should not think on  being greedy and not think the well  being of their people, we already have so many venues where city of la quinta is benefiting like coachella  fest ,  tennis events etc, greed is not the solution. Thank u very kindly for taking my concern. I am requesting that the City of La Quinta deny the zoning change proposal for Coral Mountain Resort by  Meriwether Companies and Big Sky Wave Development.    As it is now, during the music concerts which are not  even held in La Quinta, it is impossible to travel in and out of La Quinta using the normal roads we use because  they are blocked off. Adding more resort events would cause even more traffic and travel problems.    This  proposed resort would cause problems for our survival due to their usage of water and electricity.  Costs for our  water and electricity have already increased, not to mention the City of La Quinta has requested that we as  homeowners conserve our usage of water and electricity.  So there is no justification what‐so‐ever to approve a  rezoning and resort that would use a tremendous amount of water and electricity.    With the inflex of seven  hundred thousand illegal immigrants crossing the United States boarders over the past year, our taxes will  increase because of subsidy assistance for these illegal immigrants as well as defunding the police at the same  time. Crimes will increase and we as homeowners and citizens will foot the bill for these crimes.    How could  the City of La Quinta ever consider this rezoning and resort development? Impositions and mandates already  placed on us at this time are posing significant hardships and problems for us as homeowners.    Coral Mountain  Resort would be a private surfing resort. We should not have to put up with the inconveniences, problems, and  costs that will arise from a private project being imposed on us. I would recommend that Coral Mountain Resort  locate their surf resort to the Salton Sea, lots of "free" water and lots of land area, away from the City of La  Quinta.    My Vote is "NO".    P.S  Arizona is looking better every day!     I am actually surprised this project has gone this far.  We have had a home here for 20 years and this is definitely  NOT a project I would think would fit the area.  This will reduce property values and it is too much building.   Projects need to be slowed down and completed before another project starts.  We don't even have the  Silverrock Project completed yet or ALL the new housing going in across the street from this project at  Andalusia.  Not to mention this is not a project that fits with the lifestyle of the majority of La Quinta residents.   Please stop this project from being approved! We purchased this home with the idea that we were in a quiet, residential neighborhood, surrounded by the  mountains and nature.  The proposed facility would disrupt nature, people, traffic....all for the benefit of a few.   Such a facility should be located off a major thoroughfare and in a commercially zoned area where individuals'  homes and lives aren't disrupted. Please do not ruin the night sky with light pollution!! Fully oppose the project. I did donate to the go fund me. And Fully oppose the project. I did donate to the go fund me. And We are in a drought, how dare you approve this water waste while the state is requesting  to conserve!  Adding  to noise and light pollution!! Bad use of water in a desert area, prone to drought, excessive traffic, not a smart use of the beautiful natural  landscape in this area, light pollution. We love La Quinta for it’s beautiful, natural, calm environment. While we  don’t need another golf course, the private wave park doesn’t fit well in our community. I strongly oppose the  wave park.  La Quinta ‐ I am concerned about the noise, crowds and traffic (especially upon seeing what  Coachella/Stagecoach brings).  My wife and I come to the desert for rest and relaxation, to play golf and enjoy the outdoors.  Although we live  in north La Quinta and would not be directly impacted with local traffic and noise it is a huge step in the wrong  direction for the community.  It would open the door to similar developments in the future if zoning is changed  and sets a bad precedent.    We strongly urge a NO vote on this project and encourage the city council to uphold  the current residential zoning. We need to be conserving water. How can they ask us to conserve when the City approved this.   Will disturb  the beauty and serenity of our communities with noise and light pollution.   This wave pool resort project is wholly inconsistent with the City's general plan, as well as the aesthetics of the  surrounding areas.  South La Quinta is a quiet part of the Coachella Valley, and this project would create noise  and visual impacts that can never be fixed.  Plus the waste of precious fresh water would imperil the rest of the  community's access to water at a reasonable cost.  This is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong  time.  The City Council should not change our community standards for any project, much less an ill‐conceived  wave pool for the ultra‐wealthy. There is an ongoing drought in California and we can’t afford the huge use of water to go to a project like this!   La Quinta ‐ The sound and light from this project will be detrimental to our home values. It would be incredibly irresponsible and egregious for the city of La Quinta to approve the Coral Mountain  Resort.  To allow the wasteful use of our precious water supply for this project would be incredulous considering  the dire drought concerns we have locally and nationally.  With the current water shortage facing our world this  project is incomprehensible to a responsible community.  The Colorado River is experiencing a 20% loss of water  and immediate  need for conservation and our community is entertaining the approval of an irresponsible use of  this previous resource.  How can our community take water conservation seriously if you approve this project?  Clearly the future holds higher water costs for all of us with this project.  Water responsibility is of utmost  concern but then added lighting, traffic, and noise are added detractors.  And finally, 600 short term rentals  appealing to a much younger audience.  While management may oversee aspects of the rentals, police services  will clearly be impacted.  These parks are typically in rural areas not near other home developments and  communities to alleviate noise and light concerns.    A similar wave park in Texas was abandoned three years  ago and is sitting unused.    I suggest the city think long and hard about this decision.  They are sending a  message to the entire community and to generations that are counting on responsible use and conservation of  It's a waste of water when we are being asked to restrict our usage and it's the congestion will be  very  I don't think this is the time to waste potable water on the wave park.  Save the water! Wasteful use of our valuable water and lighting the sky at night. Also traffic and noise. waste of valuable water and lighting the night sky. Destroy the peaceful Nature , and water consumption, climate impact  There will be to many People we already have to deal with cochella event. too much water usage, too many lights, noise.  We are in a drought situation and you want to approve this.   That's not smart.  Vote NO to this. 600 short term rentals and 150 hotel rooms will bring way to much traffic to our quirt neighborhood ‐ this is not  the place for a development like this so please do not change the zoning. Way to many short term rentals ‐ this project will destroy our quiet and peaceful neighborhood   Concerned about traffic and noise pollution Desert Wave Park drought I think that says it all Everything in this website I agree with....makes no sense to use water in this way Our City Council needs to protect our water and environment and not sell out to greed. I get tired of hearing we  have to give up environmental protection for tourist bucks. If we do not protect our city we will need to vote in  a City Council that will! excessive water waste, traffic, noise, lighting, and destruction of nature! We have a water crisis and this is an irresponsible project for a select few.   the water usage and light and noise pollution  My overall concern is about water. The project is not in the best interest of all La Quinta residents by the fact it  is intended for private use. The planned wave pool is an irresponsible use of water when we are in a perpetual  state of drought. My overall concern is about water. The project is not in the best interest of all La Quinta residents by the fact it  is intended for private use. The planned wave pool is an irresponsible use of water when we are in a perpetual  state of drought. save the water. stop the traffic La Quinta  A waste of water. Light, noise, air pollution. Traffic and crowd problems. It is wrong oil so many ways. NO TO THE WAVE!!!!  It will WASTE SCARCE DESERT WATER & ELECTRICITY for a PRIVATE  SURFING RESORT!!   DAMAGE LOCAL RESOURCES!!  OBSTRUCT SCENIC VIEWS!!  CREATE NOISE POLLUTION, LIGHT POLLUTION &  TRAFFIC JAMS!!  INCREASE GREENHOUSE GASES & CLIMATE IMPACTS!!  INCREASE LARGE, OVERCROWDED  SPECIAL EVENTS & THEIR PROBLEMS!!  DESTROY THE PEACEFUL NATURE OF AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY!!  DON'T  LET THEM DESTROY OUR BEAUTIFUL LA QUINTA!!!!  NO TO THE WAVE!!!!!! NO TO THE WAVE!!!!  It will WASTE SCARCE DESERT WATER & ELECTRICITY for a PRIVATE  SURFING RESORT!!   DAMAGE LOCAL RESOURCES!!  OBSTRUCT SCENIC VIEWS!!  CREATE NOISE POLLUTION, LIGHT POLLUTION &  TRAFFIC JAMS!!  INCREASE GREENHOUSE GASES & CLIMATE IMPACTS!!  INCREASE LARGE, OVERCROWDED  SPECIAL EVENTS & THEIR PROBLEMS!!  DESTROY THE PEACEFUL NATURE OF AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY!!  DON'T  LET THEM DESTROY OUR BEAUTIFUL LA QUINTA!!!!  NO TO THE WAVE!!!!!! NO TO THE WAVE!!!!  It will WASTE SCARCE DESERT WATER & ELECTRICITY for a PRIVATE  SURFING RESORT!!   DAMAGE LOCAL RESOURCES!!  OBSTRUCT SCENIC VIEWS!!  CREATE NOISE POLLUTION, LIGHT POLLUTION &  TRAFFIC JAMS!!  INCREASE GREENHOUSE GASES & CLIMATE IMPACTS!!  INCREASE LARGE, OVERCROWDED  SPECIAL EVENTS & THEIR PROBLEMS!!  DESTROY THE PEACEFUL NATURE OF AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY!!  DON'T  LET THEM DESTROY OUR BEAUTIFUL LA QUINTA!!!!  NO TO THE WAVE!!!!!! We bought our home for the quiet and no light pollution experience of our community.  We already have  increased traffic and noise with Coachella, Stage Coach and other events.  Our community does not need a year‐ round tourist attraction that would jeopardize the peaceful nature of our community and resources.  This  sounds like a great fit for Las Vegas. Destruction of nature and waste of utilities/resources .  Changed natural environment  All one has to do is be in La Quinta during the Coachella festival to understand why building this facility would be  a bad idea. It should not be about making the City of La Quinta money, but rather why people will drive farther  to get the serenity that this city provides. California has a lot of beaches, we don't need more. If people want  the tourist and the craziness brought on by these amusement parks, they would move to Anaheim and live near  Disneyland and Knott's Berry farm. But this project is not for the good of the people of La Quinta, it is for the  developers that want to get wealth. Money is not everything, but peace in life is everything. Are you kidding me? A gigantic water feature in the desert of southern California where we have had multiple  drought years. This project will also likely require large amounts of electricity in an area and state that is already  prone to blackouts due to strain on the electrical grid system. Not to mention additional noise pollution and  increased traffic. None of these are desirable illness. I vote a resounding NO on this project. We DO NOT support the change in zoning to Tourist/Commercial/Residential/Open Recreation to allow for:    ‐ The wave/surf pool with its enormous water usage and noise  ‐24 hour access to the resort  ‐Operational hours  of 7 AM ‐ 10 PM 365 days per year  ‐Up to 600 STVRs ‐ 600 residences (with multiple rooms available) plus a 150  room hotel, with no minimum stay required  ‐Could be in excess of 4000 overnight guests  ‐17  “80 foot tall”  light towers illuminating the 16.7 acre wave/surf pool  ‐Hotel, bars, retail and other "sporting venues"  ‐The  increased population density with the Project hosting residents and transients alike which will increase traffic  I believe it will change what la Quinta stands for !!!! The water and electricity usage are a concern, especially the water. The traffic is my next concern due to the  size and scope of the facility and the year round nature of their service.  La Quinta light and noise pollution, traffic, environmental I am not willing to sacrifice local water and resources (in the middle of a drought, mind you) so a private  company can turn a profit The Coachella Valley attracted us, as it has many for decades, because of its desert beauty. This area is balancing  the tension of economic development against real and finite natural resources, key being WATER and energy.  Developments that are managed with current environmental science as guides can allow this valley to grow and  prosper responsibly. This proposed project is not based on current environmental science nor responsible  growth policies other communities have in place. This is a good opportunity for the council to set strong  boundaries for the future. If our water and environment are negatively impacted, the long term negative affects  will far outweigh the short‐term positive infusion of investments a project of this scope may bring.  I have lived here 54 years. Heat causes water to evaporate causing MORE higher dew point along with the  huminty.    This is will ruin the peaceful atmosphere of our community and we do not want Disneyland in La  Quinta. Our water need to  go back into our ground as when we had agriculture. Golf courses are much better.  No the Kennedys would not approve this on their land.    IT MUST BE STOPPED. IMMEDIATELY Thank you for listening! As we are in a drought in a desert, this project seems like a very poor use of water  resources.  The most salient reason is the mismanagement of our water resource.  Not a good use of our water resources, and the replenishment due to evaporation. Traffic and too many people coming from all over. Traffic and too many people coming from all over. WRONG PLACE,  WRONG TIME, TOTAL WASTE OF WATER FOR SO FEW What a huge waste of water. This will not last, this wave project is short term fad, not long term, no staying  power.  It will not last, then what?  The city will have a big mess to deal with, ton and tons of concrete.  Plus this  will be the fourth water project the the desert,  (Desert Willow's surf park, Disney's lake in Rancho Mirage and  the Wet'n Wild / Surf Park in Palm Springs.  Where will all the water come from?  We have been in a drought for  This is almost as silly as a soup sandwich.   The ocean is 2 hours away. Lots of water and no electricity needed.  We just recently purchased a new home in La Quinta and relocated from Los Angeles County to get away from  the dense population and commercial aspects of the city.  We already have major concerns being so close to the  music festivals and all the events.  The noise levels created and vibration in our complex was a shocker.  Adding  more traffic and using vital resources from our area is concerning.  We moved here for the tranquility and  peacefulness the region brings.  Bringing in a private wave park for recreation of very few and profit to the  owners at all of our expense is unacceptable and irresponsible.  The landscape around us should be utilized for  something more suitable to our community.  Thank you!     This is actually devastating to fully comprehend. The impact it will have environmentally and to our beautiful  community is unconscionable. How could a responsible city government allow this? Why would you take part in  the destruction of our views, wildlife, and lifestyle? Do the right thing. Keep La Quinta "The Gem Of the Desert".  Concerned about water being wasted when it is already dangerously low. We already give up our city for four weeks each year now to Coachella and do not need another circus and the  waste of our already extremely limited resources particularly water. This project makes no sense whatsoever. Wasting water ‐ damage to local resources ‐ obstruction of scenic  views ‐ increasing greenhouse gases ‐ the problems associated with overcrowded special events ‐ destruction of  the quite enjoyment in our residential neighborhoods. Please vote against this project. During a period of increasinly severe drought & global warming is NO time to be using precious water and  electricity for this recreational purpose.   We live in Trilogy.  We bought here in 2006 to be away from congestion and have a beautiful landscape and  desert area to live.   We are very concerned also about additional water usage in our state.  Wave Pool????   Really!!!!!????? Water waste, light pollution, STR  We have enough influx of tourists with snowbirds and Coachella and Stagecoach. To add another tourism spot  outside of our normal tourist months would take away what little privacy to our homes we have. As residents,  we're already fed up with the people that Stagecoach and Coachella bring and we can barely keep up in  businesses in both La Quinta and neighboring cities. To add a water park that would drain our resources, make it  even more expensive to live here and cause light pollution would decrease not only the value of our homes but  our lifestyle and peace. We are entitled to our peace and quiet. I'm 30 years old and I greatly oppose the  building of any type of theme park in the area. Not just for water shortage, but because of the people that  would come and change our existing way of life. There's enough change throughout the year without adding  For all the reasons listed on the flyer ‐ it's just a bad idea for this beautiful location!!! I echo the sentiments of the reasons as stated "say no to the wave" efforts The water necessary to fill and maintain the proper levels and lost/wasted to evaporation will be enormous.   Plus, I cannot foresee heavy usage when air temperatures are in the 100‐120 degree range.  After all, we do live  in a desert and must respect the safety of our residents and guests.  In addition, CVWD is already requesting  cutbacks in water usage both for drinking (restaurants) and landscapes.      All people should be able to enjoy the water park.  Adding a large body of water with significant wasteful evaporation concerns along with the lighting and noise  pollution from this project will generate  It over whelm our community, poor use of water,  increase traffic Crowds noise light and air pollution poor example to set in a drought with climate change too Fresh drinking water is a precious commodity.  We live in a desert with a unique and fragile ecosystem. We are  in a drought that shows no sign of ending.  We have a limited and slightly renewable water source that cannot  possibly keep up with our growing population that increases exponentially every year.   If we are to import for a  large body of water it should be to save the purity of our air by replenishing the Salton Sea.  Surfing is for the  ocean not the desert for a privileged few at the expense of everything that makes our city special. We do not need more traffic in La Quinta  We do not need to use more water for a purpose that does not  benefit our residents  Cochella is bad enough for us all and we do not need more people from out of town  We  are supposed to be a quite peaceful neighborhood. and the big monet is taking advantage of our way of life  NO  TO THE WATER WAVE PARK California is in an epic draught. Allowing a project that will consume a huge amount of water is irresponsible. 80  foot light towers will ruin dark sky. The size, scope and proposed special events will bring larger numbers of  people and vehicles. Noise and traffic will be a nuisance to currently quiet residential neighborhoods. Quiet  enjoyment and safety of existing properties will be compromised.  Project will forever mar the natural beauty of Coral Mountain, waste  precious water resources, hinder property  values, increase traffic, congestion, and pollution, and further impair the cultural image of La Quinta.  La Quinta  is not Disneyland, get a clue folks.  There are multitudes of negative impacts that would result if this resort, vacation rentals, and enormous wave  pool project goes forward: It would forever change and destroy, dishonor and make inaccessible a revered  stunning visual and natural historic setting that's endured proudly for thousands of years, adjacent to the Santa  Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument.  In light of today's water scarcity, this an obscene waste of  precious water.  Noise pollution, light pollution, air pollution in an area and community that's long been  cherished for its peaceful, natural setting and dark skies. Increased traffic.  People, flora and fauna will suffer.  This is not the right location for this project. Surely, there is another location that would be a better fit and not  pose this level of valid, serious, critical concerns.   HUGE WASTE OF WATER, increased traffic, increased noise In a desert, in yet another drought, amid global warming, this project is an example of the kind dangerous hubris  that will have disastrous consequences. The profit of wealthy people and corporations, or the entertainment of  a tiny portion of our population should not supersede the needs of the people and larger ecology of this valley.  That’s not how democracy is supposed to work. That’s not how responsible leadership is supposed to work.  For all the reasons you stated, it's hard to imagine the City Council members would vote to approve.   The wrong place for such a facility. I'm amazed that anyone would consider wasting the water and electricity on this project. We are in a desert and  we are in a drought. The environmental impact of this disastrous monstrosity would be horrifying.  Approval has already been given for two other water parks in the Coachella Valley. In this area we already have  traffic issues with concerts, marathons, etc. that would create even more. I see how much water evaporates from my pool and to have many multiples of that evaporating daily doesn't  make sense. This comes at a time when California is in a drought.     It would use a great deal of electricity as  well. In the not too distant past we experienced brown outs. This would contribute to the problem.     Light  pollution is another issue that has been getting worse since we moved here 25 years ago from Orange County.  Not nearly as many stars can be seen.     I grew up surfing, lived on the North Shore of Hawaii for a time and  have many friends that would love to have the opportunity to visit and surf at this resort. I would love for them  to visit and be able to enjoy that. But I would have to live with all the problems that it would cause, not  them...and it's not likely that we would even have the opportunity to surf the spot because it would be private.        I say no. A wave pool would be cool but the impact it would cause doesn't makes sense for our city. Plain and simple, it’s not right to build a huge surf park when we, as residents of La Quinta are told when we can  water our grass and how much water we can use. The idea of a surf park is great, but it doesn’t belong in the  middle of the desert.  With a water shortage this is wrong.   Destroys our peaceful desert area for local residents and the animals!   It’s  bad enough that the vacation rentals weren’t managed right to local residents got involved.    We don’t need or  want this in La Quinta.    This was a family town. Now has turned into festivals and parties!    The Mayor and city  council need to protect our city from anymore commercial projects. Enough is enough.     we are experiencing severe drought conditions and it is extremely wasteful to develop this wave project.  California prides itself with its beaches and surfing  belongs there and not in desert climate scorched with dry  and excessive heat in the summer. Human beings, animals and agriculture come first when we have water  shortages. STOP the waste. We moved to Andalusia 3 years ago and are full time residents.   We were attracted to this community because  of the views and the relative quiet of the surrounding area.  We could have gone anywhere but we chose here  not being told that the developer would likely sell the adjacent property sbd certainkt not to a wave and  transient hotel property.   It’s out of place and in complete discord with our community.    we are experiencing severe drought conditions and it is extremely wasteful to develop this wave project.  California prides itself with its beaches and surfing  belongs there and not in desert climate scorched with dray  and excessive heat in the summer. Human beings, animals and agriculture comes first when we have water  shortages. STOP the waste. We are not Orange County, San Diego County nor Los Angeles County. We live in a small quaint town in La  Quinta. Most customers for this project will be under 18 years of age. This will bring grafetti from to the area  from surrounding gangs. Traffic, trash will increase. This project won't be for the mostly retired individuals in the  area, PGA West, Triology. I'm against it.  Who the fuck opens something like this during a mega drought?!? We are in a critical water shortage in California. Our council has lost its credibility when it says this grossly invasive development will 'have little effect' on the  community.  Insane waste of massive amounts of water in desert/drought climate, 80 light towers in a  dedicated enviornmental black out community, etc, etc, etc. The land was zoned for residential and should stay that way.  City Council and the Zoning Commission should  honor the long established plans.  If you can change this ‐ what else will you change?   excessive use of scarce water and no valid requirement The community does not want this wave park, and those that do do so under false pretenses and  misinformation.     We’re in a drought and on the cusp of facing the most devastating impacts of climate change.  How do you justify this project from a community relations standpoint? A sustainability standpoint?     It’s clear  that your team is not considering the implicit costs of this project ‐ economic development for the sake of  economic development does not create a net positive benefit. Insane use of precious water. I think this is a ridiculous waste of water when our resources are at critical level. Concerned reference increased  traffic, etc. This is a desert. Inappropriate for this community Water!  I conserve as much as I can already.  NO more water developments. WATER! This project has a complete disregard to what is currently happening in our community and the larger area of  the coachella. How can you allow a project like this when we are experiencing a drought and water restrictions  are being brought in so that we are all more MINDFUL of how water is utilized. In addition, the amount of  electricity that is likely to be required to run this is also a concern. We already experience blackouts in the  summer and the amount of electricity this wave would consume would put additional stress on the system. This  project doesn't belong here. If people want to surf, move to the coast line and enjoy natural waves.  This wave park isn't need to effectively sell homes in this new community; people can go to Palm Springs for  waterpark activity. Noise, traffic, light pollution, waste of water. I'm concerned with the short term rentals and events that will increase the traffic and noise in our area.  I reside  in Griffin Ranch along Madison.  Another concern is the light pollution that will be created. The large amounts of water that will be used. We are a city concerned about recycling, waste, and use of water.  As a community it is important to use resources wisely. The second item is residents living there wanted a  serene, beautiful place to live without City type activities. A waterpark will bring in revenue at what cost?  Destroy the beauty of the desert area. Thank you for considering my thoughts.  this area will be a pariah area to the entire west.  This development is very dangerous to the future of this area.   wrong project, wrong time in the midst of a historic drought. This project is too large. I moved to a residential area…and I expect it to stay as zoned. Too many people, too  much traffic, too much water. It’s all too much. If something is already zoned in a certain way I’m VERY opposed  to changing the rules. A wave park does not belong in the desert. We’re in a drought’ La Quinta is so quiet, peaceful, and beautiful; and this development will likely spoil all of that. My wife and I strongly oppose this project. We purchased our retirement home in Trilogy La Quinta, a 55 and  over community, so we could enjoy our retirement years in peace and quiet.  We never imagined that the  zoning for the surrounding area could be changed to accommodate this mega resort which will result in a  tremendous influx of transient visitors, traffic, noise ‐ everything we were trying to get away from, not to  mention the outlandish amount of potable water that will be required for the wave park in the middle of a  worsening drought.  Please do the right thing for our communities and our environment and deny this project.   We want to express our strong opposition to the planned Coral Mountain Development and Wave Park.  My  husband and I moved to La Quinta and purchased our retirement home here in a 55 and over community so we  could enjoy our final years in peace and quiet. We specifically purchased in Trilogy La Quinta as it was far away  from the hustle and bustle and traffic of the downtown area.  We anticipated other housing developments and  hotels would eventually be built in the surrounding open spaces, but we never imagined a Tourist/Commercially‐ zoned mega resort with a Wave Machine, professional competitions, and entertainment stages would be built a  few blocks from our quiet retirement community.  This is so unfair to the surrounding homeowners who moved  here expecting a quiet and peaceful environment. Please do not approve this project. First, water! Don't waste our precious water for folly. Second...lights, sound and water should not be an issue  EVER in the desert. Third, save the beauty of this pristine location for all to appreciate. I say NO to the WAVE. Environmentally this is not a project for the desert.  We don't need to waste water on this and deplete the  water supply and add moisture to our environment.  The amount of people it would draw is not sustainable for  our community and maintain a quality of living. We are already in a severe drought. Putting in this wave pool will severely deplete what little water is left.  I  recently read the water restrictions that are going into effect for the valley so who is it that believes there is  enough water for the valley residents and support a wave pool?!   We purchase our home to enjoy the beauty, quiet and casual atmosphere of La Quinta. We purposely choose  this location to retire.  Now, with the proposed development it will degrade and change this beautiful  community.  Please reconsider  We purchase our home to enjoy the beauty, quiet and casual atmosphere of La Quinta. We purposely choose  this location to retire.  Now, with the proposed development it will degrade and change this beautiful  community.  Please reconsider  I am concerned about the waste of water because California is in a drought and because of the waste of  electricity because we need it for survival in the summertime. And also, because our city will be greatly affected  due to traffic, noise, and light pollution. We are in the midst of a mega drought and a water park makes no sense as does adding more STVR's, traffic,  noise, etc.  There will be a ballot issue to ban more STVR's next Nov. also.  No Wave Park should be allowed.   Fear of traffic issues on Madison and Monroe streets I am concerned that this building project with cause light pollution, which is something that we in La Quinta  have been committed to maintaining low lights.  Also, I feel the city can clearly see the impact that the tennis  garden, and Coachella fest have. And, soon we will have the arena off 1‐10. Further, I am concerned that this  facility uses a large area of land that could be used more responsible and in keeping with a desert  conservationist standard. I would like us to maintain a standard more protective of the land, water and  environment and traffic impact in developing new projects In our valley       I do not want the noise, traffic, event center turmoil.  I do not want to waste precious desert water on a lark.  I  do not want my neighborhood to transform into a tourist destination.  We  are  in  a  tremendous  draught  and  we   are  being  asked  to  change  our  watering  habits  etc.   The   Colorado  River,  Lake  Meade,  et al  are   way  down.   This  is   clearly   the  wrong  time  for  such  a  project. Absurd at this time to put this development in the desert where it will impact the serene desert atmosphere and  waste water and energy on a completely selfish past time of surfing on a man‐created Disneyland type "ride."   Ride the surf at the ocean where the real surfers play and respect the earth.   City of La Quinta is located in a desert; building a surfing resort is unnecessary waste of water and it will take  land away from desert animals and plants.  Stop wasting water with these types of projects. This is a bedroom community!!!!!  We are already cutting back on water usage… this is a no  Traffic and by default, air pollution, light and noise pollution!  We live in a damned DESERT! Using water of this  magnitude not only worsens the already human‐influenced humidity in this low desert resulting from excessive  golf resorts, lakes, and ludicrous landscaping, but is a sick waste of a dwindling resource needed for homes,  drinking, and agriculture, being a much higher importance than a place to SURF! Go to the Pacific Ocean! This will waste water and an environmental concern for everyone in the Coachella Valley.  Short Term rentals  should also not be allowed in La Quinta.  This project will be a huge disgrace to the community!  The water waste will be unconscionable as will be the  light pollution and added traffic.  This will be a blight on the city, please please please do not allow this to  happen.  Thank you for voting on behalf of the good of all La Quinta and CV citizens!  Bad plan for water wasting. Creating additional traffic, congestion, short term vacation rentals, night‐time light  issues.  All BAD.   Bad plan for water wasting. Creating additional traffic, congestion, short term vacation rentals, night‐time light  issues.  All BAD.   We bought here for its serenity and beautiful desert  living not carnival atmosphere.  I spent alot of money converting from Lawn to Desert Scape back in 2017. CVWD reimbused  me $2. per square  foot to save Water. I don't understand why CVWD wants me to conserve water when they approve a one billon  gallon wave pool ? Approval of a wave park in the middle of the desert in the middle of a prolonged draught would be a breach of  the municipality’s fiduciary duty on its face. Too much water consumption for the wave park. This looks like TOTAL waste of precious water. Our Governor has asked for a 15% reduction in water usage. The  Coachella Valley doesn't need a new water glutton! this would have a big impact on our peaceful community we move to this area as we once lived in an impacted  area huntington beach ca and traffic was so heavy in the area please not here.  plus we need water not too  waste it.    Please do not build this surfing resort down the street from our house.  We could not agree more that this  development would add an exorbitant amount of additional traffic to Madison Ave and surrounding roads, noise  and lights would be disruptive to the peaceful area that is our neighborhood in our distant little corner of  Coachella Valley, and it's simply shocking that the City of La Quinta would even consider developing a "water  resort" now when every river in the west is drying up, droughts are the norm in California and water is at a  premium for millions of west coast Americans.  This development is irresponsible and senseless.      You want to  build something useful at this site, how about some commercial retail like a grocery anchored center.  Especially  in light of the additional homes that are being built all around the area that need services.    Please DO NOT  allow this development to happen in the City of La Quinta!    THIS PROJECT IS INSANE..IN A TIME OF SEVERE DROUGHT!  18 MILLION GALLONS OF EVAPORATION EVERY  DAY!! WHILE WE ARE TOLD WE CANNOT EVEN WATER OUR LAWNS DURING THE DAY! It will destroy the peaceful nature of La Quinta. Traffic.  Waste water. Honestly, I am astonished that the City Council would even consider the proposed surfing resort when the  Western US is in the midst of a 1200‐year drought:    https://apnews.com/article/climate‐science‐business‐ colorado‐river‐environment‐6ceb8b539966d869169781997c7c05e6    and Lake Mead is at its lowest level since  it was initially filled in 1937:    https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/hourly/mead‐elv.html   http://mead.uslakes.info/level.asp    I understand that La Quinta and other communities here draw water from  a relatively well‐supplied aquifer. But even that aquifer is under stress now due to water use practices that date  back decades.    The very appeal (to some) of a surf resort in the desert is the reason it's a bad idea. The  message is basically: "Look what we can do: build a water‐intensive surf resort in the DESERT!" It's the same  thinking ‐‐ the "luxury/novelty" associated with squandering something precious? ‐‐ that undergirded water‐ intensive projects in the desert in the past. But we now understand that this thinking has led to a significant  water shortage today that places many people ‐‐ not least farmers ‐‐ in a precarious position.    And how long  before our aquifer drops to levels that threaten the quality of life that we enjoy here? And for what? We may  take it for granted...but how remarkably fortunate are we to live in this beautiful place ‐‐ which is, after all, a  desert ‐‐ and not worry about water for our basic needs?    This proposal is offensive and demonstrates how  recklessly out‐of‐touch some are with the water issues we face in the western states.     If people want to surf,  why not just travel 2 hours to the Pacific Ocean? Pretty easy.    Thank you for organizing this petition!    Chris   La Quinta This is not the place for this facility.  If they want to learn to surf or surf they can go to the beach.  We  have a whole coastline 2 hours away.  This is the desert and there is water insecurity on this planet. Surfing in the desert.  Get real people.  If you want to do something positive and land surrounding it.  We are in  a drought and therefore conservation should be the MAIN FOCUS not filling your agendas and coffers.  Silver  Rock development is using up valuable resources and has been going on for years.  STOP THIS ..LISTEN TO THE  RESIDENTS This project will increase noise and light pollution, traffic. It will destroy our peaceful country environment we  now experience.  Water use   Not the right development for the area and I don’t see why people would come to the desert and  buy into a surf park‐ San Diego and surfing is 2.5 hours away and a more logical place for surfing that doesn’t  require draw from the acquafer Water, electricity, peaceful co‐existence, traffic, first responders, climate impact, pollution.  We are being asked  by CVWD to conserve and yet here you are another development inlieu of a moratorium on over  building/developing.  Take a look at Silverrock, the abandoned building on Washington next the Callieo Bay, the  undeveloped and DUSTY area next the catholic church on Washington and mow you want to use up water and  resources to surf in the desert.  Get real, get smart get caring bout anything but the bottom Dollar. A wave pool that only benefits a few, ie guests or residents at Coral Mountain is in itself an insult to La Quinta  and Cochella locals.  However the most obvious is it’s ludicrous to build such a resort. The area is suffering a  major drought! The area already imports water. Water reserves are falling. Water saving measures are being  introduced because of these issues so obviously a wave pool is a ridiculous plan.   I do not understand how local  water provider can say they have enough water for the project but has big enough concerns for local users that  restrictions are required. Utterly ridiculous.  La Quinta is a quiet area. Changing zoning to put the resort is just  wrong. The zoning was done for a reason. Keep La Quinta how it is.  Profiteering is not what is good for the area,  and using huge quantities of water for the benefit of a few just stinks of corporate greed. One can only assume  that palms are being greased to even consider such a project is good for the area.    This project needs to be  stopped. A wave pool that only benefits a few, ie guests or residents at Coral Mountain is in itself an insult to La Quinta  and Cochella locals.  However the most obvious is it’s ludicrous to build such a resort. The area is suffering a  major drought! The area already imports water. Water reserves are falling. Water saving measures are being  introduced because of these issues so obviously a wave pool is a ridiculous plan.   I do not understand how local  water provider can say they have enough water for the project but has big enough concerns for local users that  restrictions are required. Utterly ridiculous.  La Quinta is a quiet area. Changing zoning to put the resort is just  wrong. The zoning was done for a reason. Keep La Quinta how it is.  Profiteering is not what is good for the area,  and using huge quantities of water for the benefit of a few just stinks of corporate greed. One can only assume  that palms are being greased to even consider such a project is good for the area.    This project needs to be  stopped. Congestion, higher density than originally zoned, light pollution, water and energy waste.  Being so close to the mountains I'm concerned about the impact on the environment and "night hunters" due to  the amount of light, noise and traffic.   We don't need another drain on our already short water supply.  Short  term rentals mean noise and traffic.  Many of us moved this far out for the tranquil, peaceful environment.   Don't do this to us. We do not need another surf park in the desert especially in this location.  Not only do we have the issues with  the excessive water usage when we are in a drought, it is the wrong type of development for this beautiful Coral  Mountain area.  The surf park in Palm Springs is almost completed and already had water rights. We don't need  another one .... Does not belong in the city of La Quinta, this is an area for family homes. With a water shortage how can we  allow a project that will use so much? Given the drought situation and the ever persistent warnings of it worsening with climate change; given the long  term construction costs, financial uncertainty, and constant construction noise and traffic; given the surge in  guest usage, traffic, and potential noise pollution, this project is not suited for this geographical location. I'm against the huge water usage, not counting that we have been in a drought for some years, I'm against the  increased noise, traffic and this development would diminish greatly the enjoyment of life for the residents of  surrounding communities; it is not in keeping with the City of La Quinta's Land Use Plan.  PLEASE DENY the Coral  Mountain Resort's rezoning. The biggest issue for me is that we live in the desert where water is always a concern, and the climate impact.  Hard to understand that the City council members are ignoring the water and climate issues this project will  negatively impact .our  The closed Kelly Slater surf park in Austin Texas provides a good picture of the possible out come in La Quinta. This project must be denied for the following reasons:    1.Waste of water,   2. Noise pollution,   3. Damage to  resources,   4.  Increase in greenhouse gases,   5.  Increase in large overcrowded special events and their  problems, 6. Destruction  the peaceful  nature of an entire community.  Residents are told to stop or cut back on watering our yards/lawns while a proposed private surf park is closed  to the public.    Residents are told to stop or cut back on watering our yards/lawns while a proposed private surf park is closed  to the public.   Excessive use of water in drought conditions.  Construction will take years and affect residents of Trilogy and  Andalusia.    Alternative routes are awful, especially for ladies travelling alone.  and will necessitate more gas  consumption.  I see nothing in this that will benefit existing residents. and the noise could be terrible. Water conservation, noise and lighting levels, interfering with nature Water conservation issues, noise problems, changing the landscape at this end of the valley No Short Term Rentals in a residential zoned community Too much noise, traffic and congestion. Not community friendly I am not anti‐development but some types of developments seem to be not only inappropriate but out of touch  with the reality of our current climate change/drought situation.  This development, to my mind, is both  inappropriate and insensitive to not only La Quinta as a community but to the environment as a whole.  I urge  you to not approve this development ‐ it should not take place in La Quinta or anywhere else that is dealing with  severe drought and water shortages.  Thank you. La QAuinta does not need a private surfing resort that will use up valuable water and electric resources Incredibly irresponsible given California's power and water issues. LaQuinta LaQuinta The reason why I’m signing this is because I believe that the waterpark or resort will be nonsense due to the fact  of this valley already has stage coach and Coachella fest where there’s already annoying people people don’t  know how to drive and route people all around so putting a festival like resort in a residential area will get a lot  of very mad people to go down to the city and they cancel just teasing to be honest with you I feel like people  are just trying to create nonsense so then they can destroy the ecosystem can destroy the water supply and  everything else and then when there’s no water for even the children on the council it’s not the residence of the  city it’s the council‘s phone because we just ran out of our water supply our land is now ruined because people  are trashy  in today society people need to start thinking instead of thinking out of the Crockett money is not  everything is nothing does not make the world go around if anything money is the reason why our earth is  failing and money is a reason why I ecosystem is failing. And there’s no need for money now put the money  back in the pocket leave the money in the pocket and keep it safe no one should be building a festival like resort  in a residential area if they honestly was using their brain.  We have lived  in La Quinta for 8 years and have enjoyed the quiet and beauty. The proposed wave park would  completely change the environment of our area. We live in Andalusia and the impact would be devastating. The  noise, traffic,light pollution,and excessive construction would truly destroy our beautiful area. Please don’t  allow this to happen and keep the zoning to residential. Charles Taylor,58170 Aracena  I am not anti‐development, per‐se. However, I feel strongly that a surf facility is just wrong for this part of La  Quinta, for the reasons stated in this website (water usage, noise, lighting, traffic, etc.). Water waste, power outages, obstruction of scenic views more traffic in the area.   irrevocable water waste when CA is experiencing a shortage, never mind the other problems We do not want noise pollution or traffic for the benefit of “a few private surfers” lets fight to save water.  Causing irrevocably waste of water is not the right choice. We do not want noise pollution or traffic for the benefit of “a few private surfers” lets fight to save water.  Causing irrevocably waste of water is not the right choice. I am concerned about the excessive water consumption, noise, traffic congestion, light pollution, and mostly  about the nature of La Quinta being forever changed for the monetary benefit of some large corporation. Please  do not allow this park to be built because the beauty and allure of La Quinta will be forever lost.  This is certainly not the highest and best use for this property.  A Low Class idea period to a high class area.   The entire project is a hideous affront to our beautiful, Quiet community; not to mention a gigantic waste of  resources. Too much crowding, noise, light and more.  It will destroy our tranquil neighborhood around Trilogy at La Quinta. I don't think our drought is going away any time soon . With global climate change, This would be a terrible use of resources maybe even crippling our future as a city. With global climate change, This would be a terrible use of resources maybe even crippling our future as a city. I think that having more people in La Quinta will really make it very hard to get around town and very hard for  law enforcement to control the city of La Quinta, as it is the traffic can't be control now.  traffic is driven by  drivers who really drive  FAST .  I have never clock the cars, But I sure at least 76% of drivers drive over the  limits. When I moved here I use to see police enforce and show some form of controlling the speed cars. I never  claim to be perfect, but I follow the speed. That is just one idea I have to start with. Makes no viable sense whatsoever  This project is the most ridulous development in the city's history.  The residents of La Quinta will not benefit  whatsoever and furthermore have no interest in patroizing it.  All this can do is destroy the most peaceful  community in the desert by the influx of trancients from all walks of life.  Noise polluntion will be uncontrolable.      Wasting desert water in the worse drought in over a century.  There  is no benefit for the Wave in La Quinta  and no residents want it. Ridiculous. There is already one being built in Palm Desert and one in Palm Springs to open. Now we are about  to be put on water restrictions, no watering during the day because of the drought but sure, build a water  wasting wave park that will never be full  increased traffic on madison.  waste our precious water supply.  just a bad idea. Environmental impact on climate change as well as disruptive to my lifestyle as resident of Trilogy. Rezoning to Commercial within a significant residential area  should not be allowed. Very poor use of our already limited water resources.  Traffic congestion, noise congestion, light pollution,  destroys our beautiful natural resources at the base of the mountain.  Please, can't we leave at least some land  to remain in its natural state?  Too much of it has already been marred forever by building houses, condos,  resorts, etc.  La Quinta has grown so fast since I moved here in 1994, and not always in positive ways. Traffic concerns  Waste of water and electricity        sewer use  light pollution                We need to think about sustainability with every new development. This project is not sustainable. I chose to  live in La Quinta 25 years ago, and I love the trails, the scenery of our mountains, and the peace that our  beautiful city allows us as residents to feel just by being here, surrounded by beauty. Coral Mountain and the  surrounding area is a big part of that beauty, and it will be ruined by this project. The water use for this  proposed project is outrageous in its scope, and in its inequity. Our dark skies are already becoming brightened  with residential lights, and this project's proposed lighting will have extreme negative impacts on the  surrounding area ‐‐ including closeby wilderness. GHG emissions from the project are unacceptable, especially  when the science of climate change consistently shows us that we need to STOP emitting, and find better ways  to build and live if we want this planet to be habitable for our children. The existing zoning is there for a good  reason, and this project throws it all out the window, and for what? A few more tourist dollars? This is very  short term thinking and completely irresponsible environmentally, socially and in every other way I can think of.  I will be voting against any Council member whenever they come up for reelection in the future who votes to  approve this zone change and project as proposed! The proposed project would be an everlasting blight on our community. We are seeing a little of how our lifestyle will be impacted with the current Coachella weekend.  We have three  weekends in a row like this.  The noise and traffic are awful.  Adding a big wave surf park will cause further  negative impact as you've pointed out in your material.  A surf park is definitely not a fit for our community.  As  situated, the traffic that is coming into town for events is centered into a very small area that is largely  residential.  Traffic in this first Coachella weekend is backing up traffic all around the festival venues.  Adding  more to this environment would be a nightmare. Wasting precious water and power to entertain out of towners in the middle of our desert environment is  irresponsible. Adding 80 ft light towers and 600 STRs are unconscionable intrusion to our residential  neighborhood s and more than likely impact residential property values. This is the wrong fit for La Quinta‐We moved out here to Andalusia to get away from the noise, and look at the  clear beautiful stars that shine in the sky‐We will now have traffic, obstruct our views of the gorgeous  mountains, not to even mention the many rentals that they are purposing  and the drought we are in. We will  now have special events 4 times a year, and overcrowded people throughout the entire year. This is not what  we signed up for‐we will be hearing continuous noise and lights that will be effecting the whole area around us  until 10pm‐this is not where the surf park belongs‐Not in this beautiful residential areas that surround these  beautiful mountains‐this will definitely destroy the peaceful nature of all of our communities, that we came to  La Quinta specifically for. Thank you Gail Taylor I'm concerned about water shortage, traffic & destroying the nature of the community.  The resort will be hurt the nearby desert environment and even if there is enough water now to serve the  resort, what about the future? It is not a good use of our water and it is not sustainable in light of climate  change with reduced supply and increased demand. Plus, we already feel trapped in our homes during the  festival events like Coachella, etc. If we add more events, the entire character of our south La Quinta  Neighborhoods will be changed forever ‐ and not for the better. May be a repeat ……As an adjunct to veritable objections to the wave park development, it very simply makes  zero sense that this project, riding on the heels of a Tourist/Commercial permit replacing the Low Density  permit that we relied on when we bought here 4 years ago,  would be approved ‐ literally in our “backyard”.   Natural resources will be impacted for generations to come.  This is not the place to attract Water Waisting  Private Developments with our water shortage already causing us to cut back on sprinkler usage for our homes. The paramount reason this park is a poor idea is the fact that the state of California is in a serious drought  situation and we should be doing everything we can to conserve water.  The residents of the portion of La  Quinta do not want this resort to be built here next to our homes and peaceful residential areas. Just wrong area for this project This project is in total odds with the objective of so many of the values the residents here find important for  their lifestyles and the reason we all moved here.  It’s shocking that it would even be considered as it violates so  many ordinances we value and on record. Not the least being a water shortage and the ruination of one of the  most beautiful mountain ranges in California. It seems that the only people who are fighting for this project are  the wealthy developers who don’t have to live with this on a daily basis.  Perhaps they should think about a  desert park in Manhattan??? This project is in total odds with the objective of so many of the values the residents here find important for  their lifestyles and the reason we all moved here.  It’s shocking that it would even be considered as it violates so  many ordinances we value and on record. Not the least being a water shortage and the ruination of one of the  most beautiful mountain ranges in California. It seems that the only people who are fighting for this project are  the wealthy developers who don’t have to live with this on a daily basis.  Perhaps they should think about a  desert park in Manhattan??? High mast lighting destroys dark sky night! I have concern on the impact of this project with our water and power and what dark skies we have left In support of the veritable objections to this project, I find zero benefits to residents living in surrounding  developments that are permitted for a low density environment ‐ save for a  close‐by restaurant on the projects  grounds. Hardly a reason to support a Tourist/Commercial permit to include a PRIVATE  Wave Park in our “  backyards” .    This is an insane idea considering the draught,and building in residential community People can surf in the ocean , we are in a drought situation!   Concerned for the water usage. We're in a drought and required to cut back. This development will use how  much water?  The water district gives us our bill and bases it on how much water we use.  They rate us as efficient and not  efficient etc.  They want us to use less water.  Don't approve this project that wastes our natural resource.  We  need to conserve water.  This will be terribly wasteful and we can't afford to do this.  Dorothy Dupree Seriously how could ANYONE in all honesty even consider such a ridiculous project in our valley ESPECIALLY in  what is considered "THE GEM" of the desert.  If approved, you can call La Quinta "THE GERM BAG" of the desert.    The pristine blue skies will dissappear just like it did in Orange County after the the city/county officials gave the  green$ light to RAPE the rolling citrus fields.  The Irvine Company was able to scalp the residents by dancing with  our elected officials who had no regards to what the local residents waned to maintain the quality of life they  wished for when they originally moved to OC.  We witnessed the demise one toll road and housing  developments were approved.    We beg you to make the morally right decision on this project    The amount of  water alone is just wrong and we will forward this to the State of CA to make sure they are aware of this project  for your consideration since this goes against what the valley "SPLASH" character AND the STATE of CA are  against.    SERIOUSLY how could any human approve such a project????  Why cant you members think about the  REAL issues like Salt and Sea and focusing on the electrical grids unable to handle current electricity shortages or  having to ask for a glass of water in a restaurant???  Helllllooo people    Signed a tax paying resident We already host a huge number of visitors for the Coachella Music Festival and Stagecoach Festival.  Why would  we even consider burdening our community with the proposed wave park and more parking and noise issues.  I  like the festivals but they are short term events.  The proposed wave park will be a long term nuisance.   Even if this project is approved, it will never be a financial success. as any projected income will not service the  debt. When that result is apparent, the developer will come to the government for financial help a.k.a  Taxpayers.    Besides rezoning changes, this project is a waste of natural resources ( water ). I think it was Robert  Ringer who said “if a developer could find the finances, you will see high rises in the middle of the Sahara  desert”. This nonsensical project qualifies. I am stunned that it is even being considered given we are in an EXTREME drought.  It is difficult enough to  comprehend how golf courses here have not redesigned their courses to create large waste areas similar to  courses in Tucson!  We live in a DESERT! All they want, to be on the map. But they care less about environment. Time to change council members in city  We are constantly dealing with droughts. We are becoming overpopulated. Why destroy the habitat of so many  animals.  The city is always pushing water and electricity management, where that with this project ?  definitely against the development of this "surf hotel development".  The city council should pull their heads out  of their ass.  We are to cut our water and electricity use.  For what, jerks like these developers. I feel like I have to let my lawn die to save water and places  including golf resorts are pristine with water.  FOOTNOTE: correct your grammar.  It’s “why YOU’RE concerned…” I'm concerned about water conservation, noise pollution and traffic. I have been a resident of La Quinta for 20 years.  This type of development proposed for the Coral Mountain  area is counterintuitive on many levels to the environmental challenges we increasingly face today and in the  future.  This project does not reflect the needs of the citizens of our community and should be rejected. I would  like to see something developed that would enhance our City and surrounding areas, not make it more like an  amusement park and tourist attraction. Just for starters...  ‐Grave concerns about the recklessness of approving any massive water‐use projects in this  time of severe drought  ‐The unbelievable lack of onsite sound testing in front of Coral Mountain  ‐Traffic  destroying the peace and tranquility in this lovely corner of the city.   ‐ The sudden revelation that most of the  housing will be short term rentals!  ‐ A totally inadequate response from the developer about the repurposing of  the wave pool should the business plan fail.  Increase STVA permits by 50% in La Quinta.  Traffic on Madison impact.  Build‐out could take decades and  potentially project could fail financially.  Stick with original La Quinta 2035 General Plan ‐ no amendments. Bad idea to have a commercial property built in the middle of a residential area. Also using drinking water  during a drought. I live in Puerta Azul and strongly oppose!   Noise  Lighting  Water  Traffic  Destroying a peaceful residential neighborhood! I feel this proposed project would be better suited closer to the I‐10 freeway.  La Quinta I live in La Quinta Cove and purchased a home here because of the natural beauty, the quiet, the dark night sky  full of stars, for a small town atmosphere, among a few of the reasons.  To allow this project will take away   some of the peace and small town charm, add so many more people, cars, light pollution, noise, and more.  This  project DOES NOT belong in a residential area.  This is NOT what this area was zoned for.  There are also  tremendous environmental concerns.  WE DO NOT WANT THIS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD and TOWN.   This tourist attraction does not belong here!  Locate it somewhere else. This is the wrong project for this area. We have too much notice and traffic already with Coachella.  La Quinta is a quiet community and should stay that way.  Short term rentals are anathema to our peace The potential water shortage would be devastating, though we may have it know, shouldn’t mean we should  use every drop of water available.  California is in a record drought with no way of predicting the future. The potential water shortage would be devastating, though we may have it know, shouldn’t mean we should  use every drop of water available.  California is in a record drought with no way of predicting the future. PLEASE PLEASE  PLEASE STOP this HORRIBLE WAVE PARK RESORT!!!!! This commercial enterprise will create noise and congestion in an existing quiet residential neighborhood.  La  Quinta does not need more short‐term rentals.  A wave park planned during a drought makes no sense.   Not suitable to the area because of traffic, noise and light pollution. Put it up on I‐10.  the last thing la quinta needs is more short term rentals…a wave park in the middle of a drought ? I am concerned about the noise from the turbines, the noise from the park in general and the increased traffic  and traffic noise. I do not want this type of facility anywhere near my home as I believe it will negatively affect  values in the immediate area.  Not only is it an alarming waste of our precious water, but certainly not suited for the area and it's impact on  surrounding homes.  Just the thought of a "water" park in the middle of a desert should signal serious concerns,  particularly when California is considering water restrictions in general.  What more do you need to know?? The southern end of La Quinta is not the place for a waterpark. Even if I can’t see or hear it the traffic on  Madison will increase exponentially. This does not belong in the middle of a residential community  The additional traffic will make this area unlivable for residents 1) Poor use of limited resources‐ extreme waste of our precious resource of potable water during our longest  drought years yet.   2) Negative Environmental impact to native flora and fauna, light and noise pollution.   3)  Very little benefit to local communities, no access to use of facilities, no affordable housing, overcrowded track  homes.   4) There are multiple other wave pool projects throughout CV already, and open to the public, why add  another resource drain.  Does not fit in with our residential community should be closer to Hwy 111 This resort is not suitable in a residential area  Does not fit in with our residential community should be closer to Hwy 111 Noise. Traffic. Lights. This is a terrible fit for a residential area and is better suited out by the new hockey arena,  along the 10 Hwy. Traffic disruption on Madison  Light and noise pollution  Water use  Zoning not approved California is in an extreme drought.  This project is using our drinking water!  Exremely callous and thoughtless  treatment of our land.  This is the wrong development for the following reasons: crowds, traffic, lighting, water usage. Being asked to conserve water during this historic drought while wealthy companies use our desert as a profit  project and waste millions of gallons of DRINKING water is disheartening. It ruins the sense of community here.  Thermal doesn’t even have clean drinking water for all its residents. How is the drainage solutions designed in  this proposed park? With so much water, the drains can breed mosquitoes increasing the valley’s chances of  mosquito borne diseases.  This park should not be built. It will have a significant negative impact to the environment and wildlife in the  area. In addition, it is a private club, only open to a select few, and not even open to the residents of the area.  Having a water park in the desert is a completely irresponsible use of water and should not be allowed.  waste of water which will impact the environment... This is an irresponsible use of water in the desert and in the middle of one of the worst droughts in California  history. It is also not open to the public, so this wasted water usage is limited to a small number of elite   this park's footprint, construction, water usage, earthquake risk and light pollution interferes with the wildlife  that is vital to the local ecosystem and which is an actual attraction already enjoyed by a majority of it's citizens,  tourists and those of us who work to preserve and encourage these animals to be part of our neighborhood.  Our state/county/city is experiencing continued drought conditions and creating such a facility with such  frivolous use of water is a statement about whether our city is really a gem or not.  And if approved, it will only  be available to those with the money to "pay for it."  If we are going to use recreational water for anything, it  should go for the good of ALL our citizens not just rich vacationers.  I do not want extra traffic, short term rentals or crime to increase that usually comes with transients.  I want  Ciral mountain to stay as beautiful as it is without development with a water park of all things. I do not want extra traffic, short term rentals or crime to increase that usually comes with transients.  I want  Ciral mountain to stay as beautiful as it is without development with a water park of all things. The extensive use of potable water is not in keeping with the current environmental conditions and the noise,  light and traffic will make our beautiful desert like the LA Freeways‐congested and chaotic. This will ruin of community and waste valuable water resources. DROUGHT....and as said all along...WRONG place for surrounding communities and homeowners who will be  dealing with issues that will come with this horrible plan....traffic....traffic....traffic....this is WRONG place! Drought!! This is not at all what the developer proposed when they can to our community for a presentation.  They said it  would NOT be for tourists and only for homeowners.  It has now turned into a rezoning of Tourist Commercial  which is not at all what was relayed.  Also, the lighting goes against the Dark Skies regulations.  Allowing STVR  also goes against the cities current ban on new STVR permits.  This development should not be allowed to get  these permits if the rest of the city can not.  Our concerns include increased traffic and noise.  We can't believe that in the midst of drought and urging  people to conserve water, we would even be thinking about a surf park in La Quinta.   We moved to Trilogy for the peaceful enjoyment of a rural lifestyle.  The dark skies and quiet environment  allows us to hear coyotes and owls at night.  This project will completely upset the community and the animals,  birds and lizards that live here.  Putting a wave park in the desert is a bad idea.  The waste of water, electricity  and resources to support something that no one in the community will use is a bad idea.  Trilogy is an over 55  community, there are no surfers living here.  Please vote NO to the Wave Park.   Wasting water  Too noisy  Will create traffic Water conservation  Noise control  Added traffic  this park does not belong in a residential neighborhood The original zoning was meant to protect homeowners from commercializing too much around there  neighborhoods and properties. This should remain intact. The peace beauty and harmony of this special area will be ruined. This would be the beginning of opening up  many cans of worms starting with this proposed project.  Please re‐think it.  Thank you As a seasonal resident, I find the idea entirely inappropriate for the betterment of this community. A wave park  will bring noise, traffic, light, crowds and additional garbage. In addition, the quiet residential value of the  homes near such a disastrus choice will definitely lower home values and community values.     We are in the  midst of a record 1200 year drought.... NOT ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE!!!!! The environmental statement DOES  NOT address the other TWO water usage projects in the valley which are already approved. SERiOUS SERIOUS  ENVIRONMENTAL WRONG to have yet another wave park! This is the SECOND one in a 10 MILE AREA!!!! NO  ONE NEEDS OR WANTS two wave parks.  I'm not opposed to building homes in the current space that is zoned as residential.  I am opposed to the  proposed resort and the wave park and the serve impact to the tranquility of the residential area I moved into  during  the late fall of 2020.  It will impact the dark skies that we currently enjoy.  It will impact the area with an  increase traffic along with additional traffic lights to handle the traffic flow.  It will change the landscape of a  beautiful residential area.      I feel that if the Mayor and City Council approve the rezoning a residential area to  build the wave park is an irresponsible action by the builder all those who approve it, especially with the severe  drought have been facing and are already facing in additional to water restrictions by Governor Newsome.  I  also feel that rezoning a residential area to accommodate a wave park and short term rentals will have a  negative impact to our property values.  This will also increase our taxes as you will need more police to handle  an increase in crime.  What is the ROI from builder to the City of La Quinta?  How much will the City receive?    How much are you planning on raising our taxes to accommodate this wave park.    This project has so many red  flags ‐ my vote is still no on the wave park. We recently purchased a home in La Quinta to enjoy the quiet, less traffic, and beauty of the mountains.  We  planned to make this our retirement home in a couple of months.  This development plan is contrary to all the  reasons we chose La Quinta.  We are opposed to these plans. Very concerned about the traffic and non‐resident individuals that will attend this project. I am concerned about the negative environmental impact that this resort will have on the surrounding area.   First of all I think that having this large construction will destroy important wildlife and plant natural habitat.  First by earthmoving activity, then by continued noise, air and light pollution from all the people and vehicles. I  think it will be a massive waste of water to have this particular recreational activity in such an arid part of the  USA. I think it will be taking water away from the community. I think the resort will change the area for the  Many reasons. See www.ccolq.org Please do not ruin our beautiful community with this Hotel and water park.  It will destroy the natural beauty of  La Quinta and create tons of noise and congestion.  Isn't it bad enough we have to contend with Cochella every  I do not want a hotel and 600 short term rentals going in our community.  The traffic congestion and noise will  greatly impact our quiet enjoyment.  Drought! Please don’t change La Quinta, we don’t need to noise or traffic! The addition of 750 nightly rental units and 4,000 potential occupants and noise is of major concern We should be conserving water, not using it for waves for the rich.  I moved to La Quinta for the “community vibe” we have. I love Old Town and all the locals. The music and sports  events that already are here bring in revenue for all the small owner restaurants and businesses. I really see no  positives from building a wave.  Waste of Water! This project is insane and a violation of public trust  this will bring additional traffic and noise and interference with wildlife.  It will help destroy a peaceful, beautiful  atmosphere we now enjoy additional noise, traffic, interference with wildlife, aesthetic negative impact We very much oppose this project . The serenity and beauty of this end of the valley will be changed forever.  This will create more noise and more traffic. Our roads have become very congested already. There are now  traffic lines  to get through the roundabout at 52nd and Jefferson . We have lived here for 9 years and have seen  a drastic change with traffic. Once the Wave Park gets its permits no doubt they will be able to make changes to  membership requirements, housing prices, and adjusting the rules to suit their needs and not the community.  I  can’t believe a project of this size can get permits when we have been waiting for 3 months to get a permit  approved for doors for our home renovation. The permit approval process for La Quinta is already a nightmare.  Once this project is approved there’s no turning back.  Noise and lighting pollution. Unlike a golf course that basically operates from dawn to dusk, this project will be  in full operation into the night. Also, shirt term rentals are not conducive to this area. Too much drain on water and city resources. Bad for LQ Noise and lighting pollution. Unlike a golf course that basically operates from dawn to dusk, this project will be  in full operation into the night. Also, shirt term rentals are not conducive to this area. Are the city founding fathers going to let our beautiful city be decimated by overcrowding, traffic, noise, light  pollution and waisting of our precious water resources by permitting the rich to play and then leave the mess?  I  say NO. I vote and have a big mouth so look out for more criticism from me. This play resort has an erroneous water use calculations in its environmental report to the planning commission  and will hasten need to abandon La Quinta due to lack of water...please vote against it so we can all enjoy LQ  longer  and not run out of water  This wave park is a terrible idea from an environmental impact perspective, as well as what a development like  this will do those of us who live in this community.     There is already a high level of traffic and unpoliced speed  issues on Madison and nearby roads, and too many issues associated with short term rentals For people who  come to visit here and so often show disrespect for the community and those of us who live here.     The  increase in noise, traffic and volume associated with so many people coming to an attraction like this will have  long‐term deleterious impact on those of us who have chosen to live here peacefully and quietly. Please  consider the negative impact this development will have on so many people.  Please deny this application. Over crowding is not at all good for this beautiful environment we just moved here to retire and get away from  Southern California crowds.  Concerns about traffic, water usage, noise, lighting. I am concerned about the added traffic, the impact to Coral Mountain, a large water park during a drought no  less, short term rentals and the crime this added burden will bring.  I say NO!!! This is happening when it doesn't make any sense to use any extra water or create more traffic. agree with all stated concerns from surrounding communities regarding the negative quality of life impact and  potential unaddressed economic/financial downside to the city of La Quinta from developer  and project failure.  Drought, Noise, Traffic, Nature, Pollution Water issue when in a severe drought. Rezoning this high traffic tourist spot in residential area is not fair to  neighborhoods. This is crazy and unjust! Don’t destroy our city! Waste of water, too much traffic It is a waste of precious drinking water and a threat to wildlife.  Horrible excess and waste.  Let’s keep La Quinta  peaceful. I moved to this area of La Quinta for a serene, quite life.  Bringing this entity here at this time threatens all of  our peace. Also, in view of the historic Drought we are in, it’s unconscionable that a water park will be our  neighbor. I am vehemently opposed. Wrong project for our community. It will adversely impact the depleting water resources for our valley, the daily  noise levels for 10 hours which will reverberate from the Coral Mountains are constant.  The Wave Pool is a  private venue. Our neighborhoods will not benefit from it financially, nor will our real estate values increase  thru this venture. It is a phenomenally dumb idea in a drought.   The wrong project in the wrong place. Rezoning, water usage, traffic, noise, lighting…it just all wrong.  This is totally the wrong use of this residential area.  This commercial project will impact detrimentally on the  quality of life on the surrounding homeowners and adjacent developments, i.e. Trilogy at La Quinta and  Andalusia , as well as others, and environmentally unsound.   This is not the right project for this site.   1.  This level of water usage at a time of increasing drought in the southwest endangers long‐term water supply  for life sustaining usage.  Expected water allocations cannot be guaranteed indefinitely if the drought continues  unabated, particularly in light of documented climate change.    2.  Greenhouse gas emissions for this project  will require carbon emission credits that should be allocated to more useful purposes.    3.  The area in which  the resort is proposed is zoned for low density residential and golf course (with a tiny corner zoned commercial,  presumably reserved for a small market), a fact researched and relied upon by citizens who chose to live in this  area.  Changing this zoning to commercial/tourist and allowing hundreds of short‐term rentals will  fundamentally change the nature of the neighborhood, violating the trust the neighboring residents have placed  in the La Quinta long‐term land usage plan and the zoning process.    4.  Noise reflects off Coral Mountain.  I  have personal experience with this from a property on Liga in The Citrus that experienced substantial traffic  noise when the stop sign was removed at the Avenue 52 entrance.  Noise from the wave park will be  substantially louder and unremitting.    5.  La Quinta is known for its dark skies.  Eighty foot light towers are  inconsistent with this designation.    6.  All of these negative impacts will be born by the neighboring community  in favor of a PRIVATE and EXPENSIVE short‐term resort experience largely unavailable to that community.    7.  If  La Quinta ultimately finds that the negative impacts of such a resort development are adequately mitigable, the  city should find an alternative location readily accessible to the highway and surrounded by more commercial  development.  The Coral Mountain property should, instead, be reserved for the responsible residential  development that current zoning and the long‐term land use plan envision. This project will create traffic, noise, congestion.  I'm concerned about water usage, lights and the disturbance  of our quiet enjoyment which we have in this area.  This is the wrong project for this parcel. La Quinta.  We are in a serious drought and the zoning should not be changed. We that live in the immediate area moved here because because it’s away from everything else. The light and  noise pollution alone will destroy the peace in the area. We all know we are to conserve water…. To make a  zoning change that will destroy the peace in the area is outrageous. Water use. Traffic. Allowing this project to go through would have a be a negative  impact on our community, when something this  size comes along its all about the money and not the people. Make the right decision for the folks who were  Noise, traffic, environmental impact. Disruption of the pristine corner of LQ. PLEASE SAY NO.  The proposed development creates traffic and light pollution that cannot be mitigated. Totally inappropriate for the fragile desert which we love and enjoy. The entire proposal is ridiculous!  Outsiders who don't care, only think of  the possible money from tourists who  don't know the difference... Our aquifers  are greatly reduced already. With the current drought now reaching historic proportions, a water park that can not recycle its water for  public use, and constantly needs fresh water for its patrons, is a ridiculous and unnecessary venture. We live in a  desert! We don't need this in La Quinta! The impact will be severe and devastating for the surround areas besides La Quinta..   wrong place at the  absolutely worst time to develop a water wave park and the ridiculously overpriced housing.  I don't want to have this here  Concerned about the water usage and the negative impact on the ENTIRE cochella valley.  Poor use of limited water resources, traffic and noise around nearby residential areas, tall light polls destroy the  night sky.  Road access to the site is limited so already busy Madison and Jefferson Streets will be adversely  impacted. A wave park development would be an environmental and ecological travesty for the Coral Mountain area  Traffic, noise, light issues. Definitely not the right project for this location.  We have owned a home at PGA W for 7 years and have now lived in Lions Gate for 10 years. I can hear the daily  traffic at the 58th and Madison intersection and dread the day when all the home building stops on 58th with  Alta Verde, Beazer, Toll Brothers and others finish. We have zero police presence down here and I could go on  for hours. I don't get what your trying to achieve besides your tax base. All of the reasons for not allowing this project are clearly outlined on the website.i agree with all of them. I have concern respecting the use of water and as well as the disruption to the residential areas. Keep the land the way it is. We specifically chose to purchase our retirement home in La Quinta as it is a beautiful and peaceful area.  The  wavepool will simply change this area for the worse, bringing in significant short‐term rentals and increased  traffic.  This possible change to our beautiful area is not what we bought into when we decided to purchase a  We specifically chose to purchase our retirement home in La Quinta as it is a beautiful and peaceful area.  The  wavepool will simply change this area for the worse, bringing in significant short‐term rentals and increased  traffic.  This possible change to our beautiful area is not what we bought into when we decided to purchase a  #1 NO SHORT TERM RENTALS IN LA QUINTA  #2 ALTHOUGH WE HAVE THE AQUAFER, DRAIN OF WATER FROM  THIS PROJECT WILL TAKE IT’S TOLL  #3 ADDITIONAL DRAIN OF ELECTRICITY WILL CAUSE UNDO STRESS ON THE  GRIDS  #4 UNACCEPTABLE REZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL TO TOURIST COMMERCIAL  #5 WAVE PARK PROJECT  WILL BE THE DECLINE OF LA QUINTA  #6 lOWER HOME VALUES Water & electricity usage, noise & traffic increases,  600 additional short term rentals ALL CONTRIBUTING to the  decline of our beautiful La Quinta.   Any counsel person who votes for the above is NOT representing the  citizens and and homeowners of La Quinta The needless use of water and the over saturated market for transient people in our valley is destroying the  hometown atmosphere of our city.  This Mayor/City manager/City council are going against the will of the  This project will bring massive amounts of traffic, congestion and noise along with invasive light at night into an  area always designated for quiet enjoyment.  This type of resort belongs near the freeway.  The traffic our  communities complain about that is part of Coachella will now be part of our every day lives.  I think this was  poorly thought out with only the extra tax revenue being a consideration by La Quinta city counsel.  It will  negatively affect the property values of the surrounding communities of Andalusia, The Quarry, Lions Gate, etc.  and Trilogy ‐ not to mention PGA & Griffin Ranch that will need to endure all the in and out traffic of daily users  of the park and short term rentals.  This should NOT be approved.  Camille Pfeifer Everything about this project will adversely affect the La Quinta residential neighborhoods.   WE are in a mega drought and the diversion of fresh water to build a surf park here in the desert is political  malpractice on a grand scale.  Follow the money and make sure that no elected official in La Quinta is taking  "contributions" from anyone connected with this "development" . . .  We’re picked the quite community only because of the quiet surroundings This would be a terrible thing to happen to our community. The noise, the traffic, and the use of water are only  some of the reasons this should be stopped.  This project would ruin the peace, tranquillity and beauty of our community.  La Quinta THIS WAVE PARK SHOULD NOT HAPPEN. THIS A RESIDENTIAL AREA YOU WOULD CHANGE THE REZONING CODE  TO SATISFY BIG MONEY. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THE CONCERNED RESIDENTS THAT LIVE IN THIS AREA. The scope of this project in the are it is proposed to be sited and the intended wave park is incompatible with  the long term city plan for the residential area it is to be located in.....follow the money. This development belongs at Anaheim, not La Quinta. I want permanent neighbors, not screaming kids, extra heavy traffic on Madison Street and brilliant lighting at  Planning and zoning is a sacred commitment that a city makes to its current and future residents.  That  commitment protects residential areas from the encroachment of commercial development which would  degrade the residential neighborhoods.       No to the EXCESS addition of traffic, construction, noise of water park, water use, changing of our 'Dark Skies',  STR's and the transient population, partying population and excess trash, tourist zoning, sound bounce off the  mountains thruout La Quinta, and traffic throughout La Quinta. We moved her from LA to get away from all that  ‐ especially damaging would be to the feel of what makes La Quinta, La Quinta!!!! Voting NO to the Wave. We all purchased homes in a residential area. We do not want the land re‐zoned. We are in a drought and  CANNOT afford to waste water. Their "recycling" of water is everything but. We simply don't want the tourists  interrupting our everyday lives. If you are going to allow this  to take place then you should buy every single  home within 10 miles of the water park. Those homeowners did not purchase such expensive and exclusive  homes to now have land near them re‐zoned for this absolute disruption of our neighborhoods. Please don't  allow this water park to be built. We need now more than ever to conserve our land and water. This is a community of home residents that live here year round. It is BAD enough that we have so many tourists  renting out private homes for weekend parties and distributing the year round residents living in these  neighborhoods. THE WAVE DOES NOT BELONG IN THESE NEIGHBORHOODS!! IT SHOULD BE IN A COMMERCIAL  AREA NEAR DISNEYLAND!! Noise  Traffic  Right next door to a senior retirement community  Noise  Traffic  Right next door to a senior retirement community  This is a quiet residential area that is not appropriate for this type of huge and disruptive commercial operation.  Move it to a commercial area that is more appropriate.  Too bright and too loud for a residential era. Additionally, this is a desert and we are currently (usually) in a  Too bright and too loud for a residential era. Additionally, this is a desert and we are currently (usually) in a  For Heavens sake people we are in the middle of the worst drought ever and you want to put in a water park?  That does not make sense to me! Is there someone at City Hall with a crystal ball that knows the Heavens are  going to open up and there will be water aplenty once we build this amusement park. This project would transform the area into an obtrusive tourist/business area that would seriously harm the  original neighborhood aspect of a large adjoining area.  A bad idea that wastes water, damages life‐styles, and  overburdens the whole area. Water use alone should stop this project.  I understand the desire to tap into additional real estate tax revenues and sales tax revenues in Riverside County  but the notion of building a large entertainment complex with a 18 million gallon water filled pool in the middle  of a residential area is sheer lunacy.    There is already a potable water issue, as evidenced by turning irrigated  lawns back into desert landscaping using drip irrigation, needed to support the existing residential needs and  water needed to support the irrigation needs of the fresh fruit and vegetables grown in the valley, also a sizable  part of the Riverside County economy.  And someone thinks we need to add a wave pool capable of evaporating  ?? gallons of water each day, to support folks who want to pretend they are surfing in the Pacific??  Add to that,  the Chlorination and sanitary chemicals needed to keep the pool safe for the "Surfers" would be a sizable  expense for Riverside County to process through their sanitary sewer system.    Surly you jest!!    The residential  streets leading from I‐10 or from CA 111 were neither designed nor built to handle the amount of traffic needed  to support the wave park.   The cost to improve and maintain the residential streets, Washington, Jefferson and  Madison from CA111 or I‐10 to the corner of 58th and Madison, would cost considerably more than any tax  revenues you raise from Real Estate and Sales Taxes.  In addition, there are few if any commercial  establishments (think gas stations, grocery stores, restaurants etc) needed to support that traffic and the  additional high‐density housing.    If you want to build a Wave Park, locate it near CA86 as it splits off I‐10 and  heads South toward the Thermal Airport or Thermal race track.    Go build it at the Salton Sea, using the water  already available.  It is already salty caused by the same evaporation that would occur at the wave pool.  Why not fix the Salton Sea and restore it as a recreation area, and remove it from the list of growing hazards  that Coachella Valley faces.  Where are we going to go for water when the Colorado River scramble begins and  we can no longer fill the pools in the Valley. Will we become the proud, tax paying owners of something that  shouldn’t have happened? We are in a drought. Adding this many more units using water is very wrong. Adding a surf park is ludicrous. I moved here for quiet and tranquility, this will forever change my life for the negative in my later years! So  disappointed! Some many other ares this would have a positive impact, commercial zones. Water usage, added traffic, noise, high light towers, and added increase in STVR’s in our neighborhood.  We are totally against this project. We are continually told to conceve water in the desert, so why any city  would even consider such a ridiculous project is beyond us. This is a major threat to our future water supply. Absolutely inappropriate . I am concerned about the extravagant use of water. the high light towers, the noise and traffic that would be  created by a wave park. Noise, lights, traffic, water waste. We moved to this area specifically because it’s quiet and without traffic. It’s unconscionable that this can even  be considered especially due to lack of water that’s getting worse each year. Please reconsider allowing  something this disruptive to happen in our lovely city.  La Quinta La Quinta This has to be the most ridiculous  planning for an area that I have witnessed in the 22 years that we have been  residents in La Quinta.  The pristine area surrounding Coral Mountain will be destroyed by The Wave Resort.  Noise, lights, traffic‐ seriously!!?? Here we are always discussing water resources and this appears. I believe the  Environmental Groups must have totally flipped out over this horrible plan. Money must talk. This is absurd! I don’t want the noise, traffic, light pollution or the WASTE OF WATER! We are in a drought! this  is a small town and we need to keep our resources safe and secure. It is wrong on all fronts and I objet to it. NO  This area is a peaceful residential neighborhood! This proposed wave park is completely out of place here and  should never have been considered for this location. Of course water usage, noise and light pollution, and traffic  are all major concerns as well. I urge you to deny the rezoning application! This is a Private Water Eating Monstrosity. With any common sense at all it should have been Quashed long ago.  Wake Up & Conserve This is a Private Water Eating Monstrosity. With any common sense at all it should have been Quashed long ago.  Wake Up & Conserve I’m not in favor of this because it’s disturbing out beautiful desert. Too many visitors to our valley leading to  congested roads. So many other reasons  Deny this rezoning! It will be too busy. Too noisy.  Use too much precious water.  ISSUES I AM CONCERNED WITH ‐ 1.WATER 2.TRAFFIC 3. NOISE 4.LIGHTS 5. REZONING OF LA QUINTA  DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN ISSUES i AM CONCERNED WITH ‐ 1.WATER 2.TRAFFIC 3. NOISE 4.LIGHTS 5. REZONING OF LA QUINTA  DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN Too much water! ‐ Don’t waste our precious water on this folly.  No more short term rentals.  Concern about traffic congestion,  noise, rowdiness, loss of our night sky.  Why would you even consider it!!! Need to conserve water.  Noise pollution.  Rowdiness from the events plus the short term rentals.  Congested  traffic.  It would mean  goodbye to our night skies.  Need I say more.  NO!!!! The water issue and traffic issue and noise issue I am against the coral mountain resort  Simply cannot imagine why this project ever got this far given its impact on the desert water situation and  community in general.  Unconscionable. Just take a drive around the area of Coachella, Thermal and Mecca and you will see acres and acres of fresh  vegetable and fruits being raised and harvested.  This  is far more important to having food on our tables than  having a useless wave park in the Coachella Valley.  What would you rather have....food or a wave park? This project does not fit the surrounding community Noise, light , water and peaceful existence  The proposed project will bring noise, use excessive water during a drought, and promote private party  atmosphere. THIS DOES NOT BELONG IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. La Quinta has not set out to become an extreme sport destination. Thousands of retirees and residents headed  for retirement have purchased expensive property, paid taxes, and supported this community. This zoning  change would disrupt all of that. At a time when there is a California drought, using 16.7 acres of water is  Inappropriate use. The community disturbance including noise/traffic/17 80' tall light towers is not acceptable. The water waste is  completely inconsistent with our current need for conservation. Please reject the zoning change. Noise and traffic pollution, water waisted, Light pollution all add up to the worst idea in the desert so far.  Why?  for private use or for the rich only.  Bad Idea from greedy developers. Say NO Property owners rely on inforced zoning to preserve their way of life and investment. This is the City of  LaQuintas governments responsibility .... that's why we elected them. Property owners rely on inforced zoning to preserve their way of life and investment. This is the City of  LaQuintas governments responsibility .... that's why we elected them. Water waste is not a good idea in the desert; much less with ongoing years of drought.      Concerned about how the wave park would be detrimental to the community .  Noise  Water conservation should be happening now!  This is ridiculous to put a water park in the desert.  And it will  forever change the landscape and beauty of the area not to mention the wildlife who will be affected  La Quinta  The most concerning issue about this project is the amount of water that will be used. We live in a  desert and there is a limited amount of water. To use this precious resource as if it is unlimited is wasteful.  There has been no information given on how much water will be used each month and how much water will be  lost due to evaporation. With much of the state in drought right now this project makes no sense especially in  the desert. Not to mention other concerns: noise, glaring lights, increased traffic and more short term rentals in  an area zoned for residential.  The Wave Park does NOT BELONG HERE!!! The Wave Park does NOT BELONG HERE!!! The level of noise created by this wave park and short‐term rentals, events by zoning as recreational area will  lower property values and use valuable drinking water from our aquifers.  Impact on water and wildlife make this park an insane idea. Drought, shortage of water, traffic, over‐development.This project is so bad in so many respects. Too much noise, locals can't afford to go there, too much traffic  My major concern is the 18 million gallons of drinking water needed to sustain the wave pool.. especially during  a drought and when we’re all asked to conserve water. The impact on wildlife and the pollution caused by noise  and light for this area.. and Im disturbed by the change of an established zoning code for this area.. how is that  Too much over building! Thus valley is too small to handle it .. stop the wave !  Noise, announcements, massive lighting & events from surf park will impact all of us surrounding this proposed  development. Major concern regarding use of aquifer water in this time when we are already conserving water. I am also  concerned about the noise and light pollution, additional traffic and transient partiers this project will bring to  what is a nice quiet residential community. I understand loudspeakers will be announcing waves every 3  minutes throughout the day, noise from the wave machine will be constant and the light towers mean we will  no longer have beautiful dark star watching nights. There is already a problem with short term vacation rentals.  Adding more of these and more events will change life for residents forever. This project seems to go against all  Water consumption This bedroom community I love will be forever changed . La Quinta The list of issues that the proposed re‐zoning and ensuing commercial usage that come to mind are, in no  particular order:  changes the whole environment of this end of the valley, where is the water coming from and  how much will be used by the water park (we're in a long term drought guys!), more traffic, how much noise will  this generate and how far will the noise travel, bad, bad idea!  Who will profit from this venture, this proposal  looks like out‐of‐towners raping the land, not giving back to the valley, ignoring the locals who will be most  affected.        There are much more serious issues  in our world to be addressed.  At the very least all questions  asked by community members need to be taken seriously and answered in detail.  We do not need to find out  after the fact that complete analysis was never done.  Think of abandoned Olympic sites that are useless and a  blight on the land.  Think of cities beginning to turn down such selfish developments.  Think very, very carefully  before ploughing ahead and making a big mistake. Don’t care a whit about out of town developers who want to create a Waikiki in our rich, specie‐diverse desert.  Go somewhere else! Take local government officials with you! Seriously? And this is a good idea because……?  The Colorado Desert is a fragile environment and home to the  threatened desert tortoise and endangered bighorn sheep, both of whom roam that area. Also, dig down 10’  and you’ll find artifacts. The usual suspects: greedy developers from out of town and greedy city officials!! The  whole idea shouldn’t have even been entertained!!!  Water usage. Zoning, noise Building a wave lake in the desert during a years long drought is irresponsible and environmentally  unsustainable. Please do not approve this zoning change. Please choose environment over development dollars.  This is a huge development project that Is neither needed nor wanted by our desert community and that exists  primarily to enrich a small group of developers and investors.  It will unnecessarily drain our community of  water and resources that are already in short supply and adversely impact our desert quality of life.   a ridiculous project to give money to a few!  stop it now! La Quinta I am concerned about noise, excessive use of water, the destruction of habitat for animals, and light pollution.  I  don't see how this development makes La Quinta better when it impacts so many things that people come here  to enjoy.  This proposal is completely wrong on ALL levels.  Please do not allow it to be built.  Thank you. La Quinta Leaders,   What are you THINKING ??? California continues yearly to be in a state of severe drought‐  and you find it acceptable to drain precious water for a multi million gallon surf pool? Are you crazy or are you  being $$$ paid off by the greedy developers ?    Don't be ridiculous ! You are being used as puppets for  big  corporate business at the cost to many, many more serious concerns.  As for the gigantic imposition of the 80  daylight bright light towers, LaQuinta will soon be the laughing stock of  the magazines and media ‐ and your  stargazers  dark nights policies will go down in history as a gorgeous relic of the past.    Valleywide, We’ll  be  looking forward to all of the Environmental Impact Reports to dismiss your fanciful and ridiculous projects.  We are new residents in CA and La Quinta and this resort is out of keeping with all the things that attracted us  here.  In this time of a protracted drought, with no end in sight, it is irresponsible even to consider this project.   It seems no consideration has been given to the tax paying neighbors who will be greatly affected. I like the quiet and privacy of trilogy… I am afraid it will bring traffic and violence to our neighborhood. This resort would permanently alter this community for the worse!  We do not want La Quinta area to become a  “big city” atmosphere where more criminal element invades our quiet peaceful surroundings.  750 short term  rentals will invite disruption to our community as it has others.  There are many other reasons to turn down this  project.  I can only think of one reason to approve it and that is for money!   We do NOT want light pollution, noise pollution nor water being used for this project.  We moved here for  beauty and health benefits of the dark skies ‐ leave La Quinta as it is ‐ don't turn it into a 'never dark at night'  city atmosphere!!!!!!!  Post‐covid full‐time residency has obviously increased, adding to traffic, congestion and light pollution. This ill‐ conceived project will diminish quality of life for everyone. Strongly oppose this development due to noise, light, traffic and water concerns in a residential area. Water consumption, light pollution, noise pollution, short term rentals, traffic For EVERY reason stated above.  For EVERY reason stated above.  It's a bad idea because: too much water wasted; STVRs invite people who are not vested in our community so  they don't care about the neighbors and this project is full on STVRs; light pollution; noise pollution; increased  traffic; and boredom. This proposal is centered around a one trick pony. A surf wave that is the same old surf  wave over and over and over. Once you've done it a few times you'll want something more challenging and  there's none of that at this wave park. It's not like a ski resort where once you master the bunny slope you jump  on the neighboring ski lift to a more challenging slope. No. Here you pack up and go to the ocean for real waves.  Eventually the fad will fade and then look what you're left with. I'm fine with a residential and even light  commercial development here but the wave pool along with the STVRs are a very bad idea. I won't vote for any  city leader who agrees to this project. We need to conserve our water! Waste of water when we are conserving..all the wrong things, traffic, safety, extreme lighting  It's bad business 18 million gallons of water during drought is ridiculous  I agree that this development would negatively impact La Quinta.  I have lived in La Quinta for decades and have  seen a lot of unscrupulous developers come here destroy the environment and then they leave and the terrible  development is here forever.  We are supposed to conserve water because of climate change.  This not only  would be a terrible development in La Quinta, but it would be extremely wasteful.  With 100 golf courses using  millions of gallons of water this would be wasting many more millions of gallons of water for a few privileged  few.  Let the residents and people who live in La Quinta enjoy our peaceful, lovely city and don't destroy it with  a surf park, for greedy developers. The waterpark is not sustainable because 1. California has a water shortage that will likely get worse over the  years due to desertification, and waterparks violate water conservation laws. A waterpark is also not going to  keep people here over the summer, it’s too hot, even for that.   2. The structure will, let’s say 20‐30 years from  now, end up back in the earth only as waste— it’s not a good longterm solution.    A more innovative idea for  the city would be something similar in sustainability to ‘the Highline’ in Manhattan— a 1.45‐mile‐long garden  created on a former elevated Railroad line. Examples include an eco‐friendly park or garden that cultivates  plants and wildlife with canopied walkways to protect people from the shade and structures to house other  innovative projects with wall gardens and solar panels and maybe underground playgrounds (who knows!).      There are brilliant propagative designers and architects, to name a few the ‘greening the desert project’,  ecology‐based architect and genius Ken Yeang who created the bioclimatic skyscraper, Amanda Sturgeon’s  biophillic design— who invest in these additive solutions, and are drowned out by the wealth of jaded men with  outdated ideas, out of touch with public interest and a dying capitalist agenda. Have you asked the people of  We do not need more massive man‐made environments for recreational purposes. The Coachella Valley is itself  a beautiful natural environment that has amazing recreational opportunities. In addition, the valley is a short  ride away from beaches, mountains, State and National Parks, Lakes, etc. These types of superfluous, natural  resource draining projects are harmful to literally all life on earth when you consider them in aggregate. Earth 's  natural resources are finite and have been in a step decline for about 200 years,  coinciding with the human  population explosion (~1 billion in 1804 to ~8 billion today).  All of us need to reexamine and reprioritize our  needs and wants so that we consider how our actions affect the natural world (negative, neutral or positive). This proposed water wasting resort is complete folly.  We are a DESERT and CA has an ongoing drought.   Meanwhile, current residents are expected to reduce their water usage more each year.  This makes no sense!   Very concerned about noise and light pollution, traffic, STVR’s. This proposed development is totally out of  character for the City of LQ and is NOT a positive addition to our lovely community. We, the residents, elected  you to serve our interests, and this proposed development is in NO way in our best interest. Please vote NO.  NO using Valley water  No traffic adding to climate pollution  No noise The area was not zoned for this type of development.  There are numerous reasons to  deny this project to  move forward.  Please consider the following…many short term rentals, water usage, noise level, additional  traffic, 80’ light towers affecting residential community and many more issues to consider.  I urge you to not  allow our quality of life to be compromised and not allow this project to move forward. Thank you. The traffic, tall towers of lights, and the unnecessary use of precious water is so wrong for this peaceful area of  La Quinta!  This is simply irresponsible and ill conceived in light of historic drought conditions which are not expected to  change. Not to mention the excessive noise and traffic. Please do not allow this project to go forward at the  expense of permanently scarring our precious gem of the desert. La Quinta’s character and legacy will be  forever changed for the the worse if this project is allowed to proceed.  I am opposed for all of the same reasons listed in this attached email Wasting water. The valley doesn't need any more traffic, we already have to put up with the road closures and  traffic for the festivals.  We like our quite neighborhoods, peaceful and dark skies at night. We live at the Trilogy at the Polo Club and I can see extreme traffic congestion and the use of 1 million gallons of  water to fill the basin plus maintaining the levels will take water away from our aquifers which will be needed in  the future. This project would ruin quality of living in my neighborhood. I live across the street from proposed Surf Park. I moved to La Quinta from the LA Area to get away from the traffic and noise. I feel it's irresponsible to move  forward with The Wave when California is in the state of severe drought, water restrictions and increase prices  in water.     The lights will change the dark skies that I have enjoyed from moving away from the LA area.      Traffic will increase and you end up having to install traffic lights, changing the beauty and peacefulness to the  community I live in.    What is the ROI the City and the community will receive? When will the community  receive it?  How does the developer expect to find staffing for this development when area businesses are  having a difficulty finding staff for current hotel, restaurants and stores.        I strongly oppose to short term  rentals!  This is a residential community and I don't agree with rezoning the area just to accommodate The  Wave.    Respectfully,  Karen L Thomas  It does not belong in the desert and this location especially. La Quinta La Quinta stop  This Eco disaster. Stop with the greed This water project does not belong in the desert, especially in a residential area. This is not the type of growth  we want or need.  Amusement parks don’t belong in residential neighborhoods. It will affect over all values in a negative way.  Water shortage. Stadium type light affecting our dark skies. Increased noise. Increased traffic. Amusement parks  are not “neighbors”.  There are no positives regarding this project.  The STR issue is a big concern, while the water availability affects  us all.  Not a good idea at a bad time. I feel this is a totally irresponsible use of our water resources. I am from the Fresno area and know first‐hand  many residents of Lemoore who have found the wave park impacted their community in terms of unwanted  traffic and noise. This project is not sustainable just from a cost perspective.   It will hinder the charm of our community and cost  us more in the long run.  Just because we have land doesn’t mean we need to develop it irresponsibly for short  term gain or any gain.     Many come to visit La Quinta because it offers something more serene and quiet,  unlike larger developed areas in the valley.     Additionally, we must consider how many cities across California  and the world for that are running out of water. I experienced this is the lovely city of Mendocino on the  California coast this summer, where there were strict water rations.     Don’t let this mistake be your legacy.      Noise, brite lighting, lack of water in the Desert. It just doesn't make any sense. It’s a waste of water and not open to the general public.  City leaders should be recalled if approved. This is a very quiet residential area.    While recreation is good, a giant wave pool is just not sustainable.  We  have a wave pool (the best) 2 hours away and it’s the ocean. Many of the residents here have their own pools  so I can’t imagine why we would want to go to what is essentially a public pool.  Also a business of that size will  detract from the local , small business vibe of the La Quinta cove area.  There are other areas in La Quinta on the  other side of Highway 111 That can support such a venture.  Sadly the infrastructure of this residential area  really is not suited for a large commercial venture.  Think of the Traffic enhancements needed, our roundabouts  would need to become larger, traffic lights would need to be installed on 4 way 2 lane bidirectional streets.   Parking and parking enforcement would need to be enhanced, energy use for such a small district as IID would  increase dramatically. Short term rentals bring crime, drugs and inflation to a already increasing market.  Not  the best idea here folks! Please consider the homeowners.   The other wave pool is in the middle of nowhere and not surrounded by SFR housing developments with limited  access points. I'm a retired 30+ year surfer who's been to the other Surf Ranch and can't believe they'd even  consider putting one in Coral Mountain.  Inconceivable!  The other wave pool is in the middle of nowhere and not surrounded by SFR housing developments with limited  access points. I'm a retired 30+ year surfer who's been to the other Surf Ranch and can't believe they'd even  consider putting one in Coral Mountain.  Inconceivable!  Not a good idea with the climate change upon us and more tourist and snow birds than we can squeeze in ...  Enough is enough in our valley Absolutely opposed to this Surf Park & Ironman This is a terrible project that will drain a HUGE amount of water from the aquifer which ALL Coachella Valley  residents depend on. It is totally inappropriate in a drought afflicted desert. I don’t want the water park in this town, it’s cost too much water, is causing traffic noise. I want you to know that we are against the proposed Wave Pool. The reason we bought 11 years ago at Trilogy  was because of the quiet and the dark. It resembled our life growing up on the farm. Now the proposed Wave  Pool threatens that serenity. I can tell you without a doubt that the noise will be much more disruptive than the  deceptive developers are portraying. We live in the SW corner of Trilogy (62nd and Madison) up against the  berm and we can easily hear the race car track in Thermal which is over 5 miles away and we weren't supposed  to be able to hear that. We love the fact that there are so few street lights and the ones that do exist have  limitations on their height. And yet you are considering setting all the rules, including STVRs, along with all that  makes La Quinta a great place to live aside just for a few bucks. We tolerate Coachella, Stagecoach, Ironman,  the PGA golf tournament, the tennis tournament, etc because while those events are disruptive to our lifestyle,  they benefit the community and we are only disrupted for a short time. Now you want to shove this Wave Pool  down our throats and force us to deal with it every day. No thank you! Traffic, noise, congestion, ecological impact.   Just put a bucket of water outside and measure the daily change in depth. Multiply the surface area of your  bucket by the surface area of the proposed wave pool. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand  that that development is going to use a lot of water. Yup, I know that many of us have pools and live on golf  courses.  Had we known the water situation of the greater southwest we might have made different choices.  Putting in a multi‐mullion gallon, water dependent, "exclusive" only, project like this, during one of the worst  droughts in history, is incomprehensibly stupid.  As are those trying to push it through. And dangerous.  And  environmentally irresponsible. And completely inconsiderate to ALL the taxpaying residents of La Quinta who  depend on the same water resources that this project will be draining, year after year during global warming.   No "valuable" new jobs will be created either.  They will be minimum wage jobs at best.  Rest assured that there  are thousands & thousands of us living in La Quinta who are very aware that the Schwab family is backing this  project, & are likely "pulling a lot of weight" politically" to push it through for purely selfish financial reasons,  with no thought for the local environment or residents. But no one involved seems to realize that "us thousands  & thousands" who actually LIVE HERE, also have VERY VERY VERY deep pockets financially, & are VERY VERY  opposed to this project.  And we will fight with the same amount of money AND vigor against EVERYONE with  the short sightedness & greed trying to push this project through. Besides all of the above valid reasons, this is an elitist project that provides absolutely nothing for the residents  of La Quinta other than a select few ‐ you know those other taxpayers and voters. The fact that the City would  even consider this project is disappointing. I hope it's because they must, but will listen closely to all residents  and recognize that all these concerns are real and affect everyone in the Valley. Traffic  Excessive noise  Major light pollution   STVR problems   Extreme Water waste  Animal endangerment    Disregard for the master plan    Everything about this proposal is just so wrong.  We are in a terrible drought, what a waste of a precious  resource.  Light pollution,  too many STVR, more traffic and congestion on the streets….Please stop this train  Simply because of how prone to droughts we are this project does not make sense. Secondly, this resort is to  accommodate wealthy foreigners and I’m willing to bet a night at the resort isn’t something people of the  community could afford. Instead of building this, why not relocate the funding to cities further east such as  thermal and mecca. They are underprivileged and this resort would only be for the privileged to enjoy.  Simply because of how prone to droughts we are this project does not make sense. Secondly, this resort is to  accommodate wealthy foreigners and I’m willing to bet a night at the resort isn’t something people of the  community could afford. Instead of building this, why not relocate the funding to cities further east such as  thermal and mecca. They are underprivileged and this resort would only be for the privileged to enjoy.  This projects violates everything that relates to natural and cultural resource protection and conservation. It’s a  shameful play to reduce our water resources by encouraging visitors to pretend they’re at the ocean; visitors  can go to their hotel pools. What in the world are LQ’s mayor, City Council, and Planning Commission members  thinking?! Wave Development is a “foreign,” entity, headquartered in Delaware, with a LA (Wilshire Blvd. yet!)  address!! Really? LQ residents are well aware City management is not interested in what residents think. Did  residents vote on this Wave thing? This is just another example of out‐of‐touch elitists making hideous decisions  that residents do not want!!! Quit commercializing the open space and cheapening the image of our beautiful city.  We want peace and tranquility maintained. Everything about it screams NOT good for our area, the water  resources alone are completely insane & w/o  thought to the future for our children! Let these money grubbing idiots make money elsewhere.  This project  shouldn’t even be a consideration! NO NO NO! Opening up La Quinta to the Waterpark will destroy the night sky preserve and the natural desert feel of the  area that has been a draw for people from around the world. The residents will deal with constant noise,  light  pollution,  traffic and disruption of our right to peaceful existence.  Not to mention California‐ and the world! ‐ is  in the midst of a drought. How does a giant wave park in the California desert seem like a good idea? As a city  we should be emphasizing the amazing allure we have as a desert destination,  not depleting our natural  resources so some out of town rich people can make a buck. It is the responsibility of the city council to protect  and petulant the interests of the residents not developers. Please do the right thing.  I am very worried about the amount of water this will require. Our water bills keep going up! Water is the main issue here aren’t we in a drought? Enormous waste of water in a drought stricken area is irresponsible. The proposed park will be an eyesore and  will devalue our homes and cause numerous problems with traffic, littering, and public safety, escalating crime  We don’t need anything that requires so much water while in a drought. Neither wave park nor golf course.  just more pollution and noise...stop both! Increase in traffic and pollution Awful idea. It will hurt properly values of nearby homes. It will effect the beautiful dark sky.  Use of fresh water  only vs non potable water is a huge risk to our water security. If I lived next to this project I would feel very  betrayed by my city leadership. 👎 1. Noise pollution. 2. Light pollution. 3. Power consumption. 4. Environmental disturbance (wild animals). 5.  Traffic tension. 6. Water supply.  1. Noise pollution. 2. Light pollution. 3. Power consumption. 4. Environmental disturbance (wild animals). 5.  Traffic tension. 6. Water supply.  I love to see my stars at night, to hear the owls and coyotes sing, and enjoy l knowing we will have enough  water for our future here.  Irresponsible development  on so many levels. City counsel seduced by these developers! Water usage should benefit all. I’m against development of a resort like this. A wave pool would is terrible for the environment and water  shortage. I’m also against the development of a resort of this size will cause unsustainable traffic, Disturb the  the beauty and natural surroundings and disrupt the peaceful residential community of La Quinta  Water usage & habitat destruction. Nothing in it for the locals (usage) We have enough traffic here already. This water would be much better used in the salton sea. Don't agree with wasting that amount of water.  One of the biggest reasons we bought our home in La Quinta Cove is to have a peaceful, quiet, refuge from busy  city life and to see the stars! We could not see the stars like this in Los Angeles. When we tell people how  wonderful La Quinta is, we tell them those things and they say awwwww you're so lucky, what a dream! But a  giant tourist trap with giant lights could destroy that peacefulness for us. And all that ‐ not to mention our huge  concern about the drought. We are deeply concerned about this drought. Given drought and water shortages I don't see how rezoning to allow this kind of development works.   We're in a drought. We cannot afford to waste water for the uber wealthy to surf! The wave project will destroy our beautiful night sky, increase traffic and noise. It is not right for the desert. I just think it totally irresponsible to approve this project during a serious drought and in a residential zone. The drought situation for all of California is very concerning.  I just spent $5300.00 to zero scape my front yard. I  don't believe this is a responsible thing for the city to do.  Also I can barely get out of my neighborhood because  of the traffic on Jefferson.  I am on the corner of Jefferson and 50.  There are several things going in on this  corner making it even more busy.  I'm beginning to think La Quinta is going in the wrong direction. Water glut, traffic, light pollution, STRUs, ridiculous project for a DESERT. Waste of water and we don’t need this in our town.  Water usage main concern, additional noise, traffic and congestion will harm the idealistic nature of La Quinta.   I agree that we do not need a development like this in La Quinta.  La Quinta. This idea has nothing to do with  the residents that live here it’s all about more money for the money  hungry corporation that want it in. I love our community and the small town feel. Don’t blow it!!!!! Severe negative environmental impact for  La Quinta and it’s residents.   La Quinta First of all, we are in a drought, why would you want to allow this place that people who live here can't even  enjoy themselves, to be built? Your taking from our drinking water supply and creating havoc everywhere you  turn. Coral Mountain especially is a very sacred area. If children and families could afford to go to this wave pool  maybe it would be different, but it's not and not just anyone can go and enjoy this "wave park". You approve  this whats next? Disneyland?  Not Happy about this resort & what it will do to our property values. La Quinta has a very upscale image & this  proposed resort will absolutely ruin it.     I am categorically against  the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park for a multitude of a reasons.  To begin, it  is irresponsible to rezone our low density, residential communities for a party festival‐like attraction, where  local citizens would not be permitted.  The only enjoyment would be for those that do not even live, work or  sustain our beautiful gem of the desert.        La Quinta has tried to mitigate the excessive, poorly managed, short  term rentals that theaten to destroy our neighborhoods. There is no rational excuse to invite the problems we  are trying to eradicate by adding 750 STVRs.      La Quinta advocates dark skies for stargazing,  preventing even  common, residential street lights. The 17 proposed, 80' mega light structures are truly against that initiative.  The developer's previous demo failed to prove his claim that the lights would be "shielded" to prevent the  nuisance until 10 PM for all those that live in the surrounding area.  No one wants to live next to a stadium of  lights 365 days a year.       This wave park would also bring massive, negative environmental impacts, including  noise pollution from loud speakers, wave making machinery, music and thousands of attendees,  plus traffic  congestion, CO2  emissions, and multiple dangers to our endangered bighorn sheep.          Furthermore, our  blackouts, due to a strained electrical grid, would add to the list of increased future disasters if this wave park  monstrosity was approved.     Most importantly, we are living in a state of eternal drought. The data regarding  the Colorado River, Lake Mead and our aquifer is alarming. We have had to replace grass with desert scape on  our private properties as well as public areas to reduce water waste. We are on a tiered water pricing system to  encourage water conservation.  Significant funds have been spent to utilize non potable water for our  established golf courses. The Coral Mountain Resort wave basin will be filled with 18 MILLION GALLONS OF  DRINKING WATER that would drain our already compromised supply.  Our a 120ﾟ heat would exasperate the  evaporation rate. La Quinta residents would all pay the price of such irresponsibility. Do not put this strain on us!     I am absolutely against  the proposed wave park for a multitude of a reasons. To begin, there is no responsible  reason to rezone our low density, residential communities for a party festival‐like attraction, where local citizens  would not even be allowed.  The only enjoyment would be for those that do not even live, work or sustain our  beautiful gem of the desert.      We have tried to mitigate the excessive, poorly managed, short term rentals that  try to destroy our neighborhoods. There is no rational excuse to invite the problems we are trying to eradicate  by adding 750 STVRs.      La Quinta advocates dark skies for stargazing,  preventing even common, residential  street lights. The 17 proposed, 80' mega light structures are truly against that initiative. The previous demo  disproved the developer's claim that the lights would be "shielded" toprevent the nuisance until 10 PM for all  those that live in the surrounding area.  No one wants to live next to a stadium of lights 365 days a year. This  wave park would bring massive, negative environmental impacts, including noise pollution,  traffic congestion,  CO2  emissions, multiple dangers to our cherished bighorn sheep.   Do not put this strain on us.. Water is a  lifelineWhat makes anyone think hat hat fresh water that we sir that we have had to concern reducing changing  our rasts to desert's gaping throughout our city privately and We are in a drought. I have a home close by and we go there for the quiet solitude away from Los Angeles for  the past 15 years. Once you put this loud park here the area will never be the same. Our property values will  drop. People already don’t want to live near it and it’s not even built. This amusement park for surfing and  concerts should be much farther away from residential homes with better road access for emergency exits to  the freeways. The Coachella Festivals already ruin traffic and noise every weekend the entire month of April in  our residential neighborhoods. Noise levels will be out of control and they are going to be coming from both  sides if they have events during April too. The traffic around the roundabouts are already deadly enough  without the additional traffic. Look at the Amex tournament traffic issues. Next there will be even more street  lighting needed for all the people who are unfamiliar with the area and more traffic accidents. The beach is 2 hours away from us here in the Coachella valley. Anyone can go at no cost to enjoy waves and  free water. We should not give into the greed of money to waste precious resources. We don’t need to light up  our beautiful sky’s with more light and our quiet neighborhoods with excessive noise or more traffic. Let all that  stay in San Diego and in Los Angeles.  Of the myriad concerns I have with this project, the water requirements in an age of drought and increasing  temperatures are grotesquely irresponsible and disrespectful of our desert and its inhabitants. Please reject this  project. Putting this needless and elitist pressure on scarce resources imperils our children for profit.  It demonstrates  callous disregard for average citizens and suggests an abnormal affinity for those who would dance while Rome  burns. Putting this needless and elitist pressure on scarce resources imperils our children for profit.  It demonstrates  callous disregard for average citizens and suggests an abnormal affinity for those who would dance while Rome  burns. Water, traffic, noise, crime, light. Noise, traffic, need for additional police...the reason people move here is for quiet, residential NOT short term  rentals, bars, more music festivals with drugs, etc...thank you The amount of drinking water required for this project is unthinkable. This private wave community is about  making a profit regardless of the cost to the environment.   Vote NO! We are in a serious drought. This is not beneficial to anyone but the developer. It's a waste of precious  resources. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand the irreparable damage this would cause to the area we  Developer is the same one the city used for SilverRock. The city has dumped money into this project for years.  Same Mayor, same developer, even worse project. Cost to taxpayers undetermined. Impact on surrounding  communities will affect housing sales. The mayor and council are destroying La Quinta not preserving it.  Say YES to the wave!!!! Surfing is an incredible sport!!! Great exercise and will bring money to our economy!  Kelly Slater is a incredible businessman! Fair and responsible!  Just like many other people who have moved to the neighborhood is to find peace and solace and I am sure that  this would be the contrary. It would be like living across the street from Disneyland and this is not what I want!  The profligate waste of water in the mega drought conditions across the state and in the Coachella Valley is the  greatest concern I have about this project. This is the wrong time and the wrong locale to construct this project. I hate the idea of reasoning from residential to TOURIST /COMMERCIAL   Who wants to live next to Disneyland!!  I bought way out off of 58th street for the peaceful surroundings and mountain vistas.  This development will  bring traffic, noise and light pollution while bring in the citizens of La Quinta nothing of value in return.  Most  residents will not be able to or desire to surf in the resort! I am concerned and deeply troubled about the traffic, noise, water consumption and unnatural lightening that  this proposed amusement park is going to bring everyday of the year!  WE moved to la Quinta for the peace, the  quiet , the loveliness of this "gem of all cities" in the coachella valley.  If this goes through it will become the  "garbage dump of the coachella valley". Prices of homes will go down and we will certainly move.  Would this  amusement/wave park be better off in a business or casino area.  That would  make more sense.....why punish  us?   Does La Quinta need more money?  Then for goodness sakes I would rather have you raise taxes then have  to move somewhere in the valley for the peace and quiet that we love now and enjoy!   Please please do not let  this happen.    Bruna Gasparini The lot was planned for a private country club golf course and additional high end housing.  This was a major  decision in moving into the area.  Now it will be a huge attraction (think Knott's Berry Farm) for increased traffic  and congestion.  The roads in and out of 58th are not designed for that much traffic. Nothing good can come out of this proposed resort.  If there even needs to be an explanation to anyone on the  City Council as to why it would not be a good thing, therein lies the problem.  Many must be on “the take” if this  does go through and shame on City Council.   Our desert area’s available water is already taxed. Bringing in a project such as this will only stress our water  supply beyond its capabilities. I have spoken with friends from Lemoore, a small Central Valley town where  there is another Slater wave resort. Those citizens were initially excited about the rarity of having a business  such as this, but it quickly turned negative based upon the water facility’s use of water that would normally be  used for farming, along with the noise and crowds associated with events held at the site. We all moved to this area for peace and quiet and serenity. The land where the wave Park is planned to be is  supposed to be zoned low density residential. To change this to tourist commercial would be a travesty for the  neighborhood. The traffic implications, the noise, the constant flow of tourists in and out is unbelievable. When  our city has recently put a stop to all short‐term vacation rentals to be told that this development will have a  special permit to make them 100% vacation rentals is horrifying. Water usage. Lights.  This can only be enjoyed by those with extreme wealth. I would like to see more beautiful natural areas with  trails that all people can enjoy.  Our community mitt has so much wealth let’s not loose track of the natural  beauty which makes this such a special place.  The use of our aquifer water for the enjoyment of others.  1) Additional traffic and traffic noise on Madison Street. has been getting worse as it is.  2) Additional traffic on  Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, 58th, 54th, etc  3) DARK SKY COMMUNITY where we live WILL BE IMPACTED by  lighted sky Only for the rich, will bring more traffic, congestion and stress on our already stressed infrastructure. This project is counter to the La Quinta general plan and a variance for this use should not be allowed.   Mitigation for key elements of the plan have not been shown feasible some of these include 1) Water usage 2)  traffic congestion 3) Electrical power usage 4) Impact on big horn sheep.  Permitting this variance in its proposed  form will create a constant incompatibility between the project and surrounding residents. Please reconsider  this variance and return to the original land use plans First of all, we are in a severe drought. I bet If the Governor knew about this project he’d stop it. We haven’t had  any significant rain here in years. Also, it’s private. No public access. The lighting will kill the no light ordnance  put in place in La Quinta decades ago. How do they get away with that? We have a water park in PS that has  been closed for years. Why not fix that up. And where would the water come from? The Colorado River is in  serious trouble so much so that lake Mead is down 12 ft. And maintaining water in the desert heat, how will  that be done. No! We nor any property in Cali needs a private surf park! Isn’t that what the ocean is for? It is irresponsible to build a development focused on water sports during the current drought conditions.  Until  the water issues with IID, State of CA, and others resolve the area’s long term source and delivery issues, the  development rezoning should be denied. Destructive to the wildlife and traffic considerations. A water park like this is a waste and not beneficial in it’s  location. This is a quiet residential neighborhood, which is why we bought here.  This proposed project will change all  that. Please consider the interests of the thousands of neighboring homeowners and don't change the zoning of  this parcel of land. Thank you. Our water resources being wasted, traffic, noise, and its limited to who will be able to use this park, plus the  amount of water and power it will take to operate this site. We might as well build a ski resort.... Our water resources being wasted, traffic, noise, and its limited to who will be able to use this park, plus the  amount of water and power it will take to operate this site. We might as well build a ski resort.... Environmental impact, our water and the drought we are in, the disruption to the community with little to no  benefit to the community, the congestion and traffic, noise and light pollution, etc. My list goes on I just bought  my house here in La Quinta with the knowledge that the land outside of my gates was zoned for residential use,  not tourist commercial! The draw to this area was the beautiful and quiet nature all around. Also, what happens  if/when this community ends up being a “flop”? Have you not seen the devastation caused by big developers in  down markets? This proposed community is exclusive and for the enjoyment of few but at the expense of many.  It is crazy that this is even being considered. Can’t want to speak to my real estate attorney about this. I wonder  how many new residents are in my same predicament? Or have you not even considered the implications? I  urge you to put a stop to this at once.  My concern is the environmental impact this would have.  We are in a drought. The idea of wasting 18 million  gallons of water so that the uber wealthy can ride a manmade wave is irresponsible.  The water evaporation  rate on a warm day according to the Lemoore wave park is 250,000 gallons of water per day. I would propose a  recall of any council member who would approve this. Deficit of water, detrimental/costly to neighbors, natural environment, night skies, and traffic patterns.  Silliest  idea put forth in a long time, yet money gain for investors and our local leaders appears to take precedent over  all the negatives.   This private water park resort is an egregious use of community water resources. Dark skies are treasured in la  Quinta. This resort fails our town today and for our future. Please vote against this resort.  Increased traffic on Madison will make the use of the two resident gates to PGA West very hard and dangerous  to make left turns off.    Noise from the traffic will degrade the quality of life for those adjacent to Madison.     Increased transients in this purely residential part of La Quinta will cause congestion at shopping areas designed  for residents, not tourists. This will also increase traffic violations such as speeding and littering.    The huge  elevated lamps will destroy our evening sky. Those of us who are amateurs with telescopes will be deprived of a  valued pass‐time.     The capacity of the hotel and residences seems to be around 2500 to 3,000 persons. That is  a population group that will strain emergency services, such as police, first aid, fire and others.  All of the following:  Water, lights, traffic, noise, hotel, VRBO’s.  This is a residential neighborhood, not an area  for an amusement such as this.  We are in a drought and water is precious.  The lights will ruin our “night sky”.   The traffic and noise will ruin our peaceful surroundings. When I bought a home in this location two years ago, it was to get out of the busy and loud Los Angelos scene. I  chose La Quinta over Palm Springs because it was more private, quiet and not touristy. Adding this resort would  be an awful addition to a very peaceful neighborhood. Also, and  probably more important is that we have a  water shortage and in a drought and the amount of water wasted on this ridiculous venture is negligent.we  already have one water park in the valley and adding a second one would impact the environment negatively.  Major environmental concerns. This is outrageous. We have a serious water issue in the state of CA.  Light pollution.  Not in keeping with neighborhood.  Waste of water during long term drought    This primarily a residential area, i.e.  bedroom communities, with a few golf facilities! The traffic, increased  lighting and noise level from such a facility would be horrendous for the community, not to mention the  property values, devaluing them substantially and the same would apply to constructing any form of apartment  Traffic is already getting much worse.  Not to mention lights at night and noise.  Also, the possibility of increased  crime in LaQuinta!  It seems like an easy decision — not in La Quinta or any other residential area, for that  matter. The I‐10 corridor has lots of unused land and would be much easier to access from the freeway.  Please,  don’t make the mistake of negatively impacting our community.  Your actions will never be forgotten.  Needs to be moved to I‐10 corridor.  This does not support the people of this desert. The added congestion to the east valley is not wanted. I have significant concerns about lighting, noise, traffic and the environmental impact of the project.  Not the right project for this area  Too much noise and light pollution   It will bring unwanted traffic to our  neighborhood  Opposed to the lights This is not the place nor time to do this. Please do not ruin our beautiful city with this.   Thank you This is not the place nor time to do this. Please do not ruin own beautiful city with this.   Thank you   I say NO to the park as the plans are presently. There are  many valuable issues  to consider like environment,  water, wildlife, roads, etc.  Not allowing the community in alone will cause problems. If you want more revenue  for the city bring the Salton Sea back to life.  Bringing in ocean water seems a good idea  for  the sea and park.   Put both out there and double the fun, money and help  provide jobs. There’s more space there and it will help  the dust.  It seems the park will contain all the shopping , restaurants etc keeping the members within its walls  not into town.  The Salton Sea with all the recreations it will offer definitely will bring in the money. It did before. I say NO to the park as the plans are presently. There are  many valuable issues  to consider like environment,  water, wildlife, roads, etc.  Not allowing the community in alone will cause problems. If you want more revenue  for the city bring the Salton Sea back to life.  Bringing in ocean water seems a good idea  for  the sea and park.   Put both out there and double the fun, money and help  provide jobs. There’s more space there and it will help  the dust.  It seems the park will contain all the shopping , restaurants etc keeping the members within its walls  not into town.  The Salton Sea with all the recreations it will offer definitely will bring in the money. It did before. It will bring too much traffic…lighting in the desert has always been an issue…NO LIGHTS LET THE STARS SHINE.  We have been in a drought and that continues…so how is the water waste addressed by the city council? And  the Noise….OMG…please check out how loud the wave machine is and how the noise level will carry throughout  our community. Seems like the city council could put that land to better and profitable use. Considering the drought we are in, and have been in for many years, this project and any other water projects is  ludicrous!  I don’t even think we should have all the gold courses and reseeding that we do. We need to  conserve our precious water resources.  The location is too residential and quiet ; this resort and lighting would be detrimental to the lifestyle  experience of the residents. Noise, traffic, lights ‐  Not right for the area.  We do not need more short term rentals. Simply put there is no good reason for this project to go forward.  All of the negatives have been presented time  and again.  The traffic, congestion, disruption to our area; as well as the drain on our precious water supply, at a  time when can least afford it.  We do not need this now or ever. I think the City of La Quinta can find better use of land and a wasteful use of water, noise and increased traffic.   How about a convenient store.  Water shortage   Congestion to communities  Etc   First) Water, Water, Water!!!  Second) Lights, Noise! The City Council is making poor decisions from the invasion of residential communities by STVRs to the  subsidizing of SilverRock and now this land grab for a project that will ultimately fail and become a tax write off  for developers.   We are in need of housing. Quit voting this council back in.  Outrageous water usage, inaccessible for the community,  traffic and light pollution  Water is a precious resource that is in short supply and this wave pool is not a responsible use of our limited  resource.  I am opposed to the rezoning and commercial development at this time of water conservation  save the water for our residents, not the wealthy tourists La Quinta,  Doesn't belong in a valley where there is a drought.  The noise, lights, traffic will be non‐stop.  7 am‐ 10 pm.  Horrible idea. This is unnecessary in these times when water is so precious.  The amount of water to fill the basin and or  maintain the level due to evaporation is appalling. Also huge negative impact from noise, traffic etc to the local  residents in this area. This project will waste a tremendous amount of potable water during a 20 year drought, it will add unnecessary  traffic and noise to the surrounding residential area and the proposal to add large numbers of short term rental  units by rezoning is providing LQ with an "out" from their STR ban. It is unlikely that the multimillion dollar  residential homes will ever be built, because no one in their right mind would want to live in an amusement  park for surfers. At a time when large areas of the world including areas in CA are moving away from excessive night lights due to  their negative impact on wildlife, especially migrating birds and also to human health, La Quinta is moving in the  opposite direction. The impacts of this excessive lighting is well documented and factually accurate.  17 ‐ 80' light poles are too much as seen from the street last night Crowds and traffic with no benefit to permanent residents. Noise and water usage.  Wasting water, increased traffic and noise! ‐ if people want to surf, go to the beach! Wrong project at this time and in this location The biggest issue I have with this craziness of a water park here in the desert makes no sense at all.  We are  being asked to do more with less but yet this does not apply to those with the money.  For many years there has  been an understanding to protect the deserts night sky...that is why we have the dim street lights, but this Party  Time Project would bring in 17 boom lights, so the rules don't apply.  The bottom line is this is a horrible idea for  such an environmentally sensitive area.  Be smart and deny the rezoning.  Thank You Linda Wheat I am not opposed to commercial development.  I own/rent 500,000 Sq ft of Commercial/Industrial office  warehouse space nationwide and the company I founded employs 900 people and occupies all of that space.  As  a former Chair of the Board of municipal and State Chambers of Commerce and their Real Estate Tax  committees, I also understand the desire/need to increase municipal tax revenues by introducing commercial  operations inside city limits.   They provide the municipality with revenue and they don't vote!!     A water park  is the wrong type of development in a residential community.  Given the issues of the current water drought,  idling/plowing under acres of agricultural land associated with the lowering of the sub‐basin aquifer in the  Coachella Valley, merely to make a wave pool for surfing stretches the imagination.  The Coachella Valley and  the municipality must be in desperate for tax revenues!   Build the water park, if you must.  Build it nearer to  major infrastructure that can handle the increased customer traffic and emergency vehicles (there will be  many).   Use up 13 M gallons of drinking water to fill the wave poos if you must.  At least the golf courses use  recycled water.   In addition, locating the water park in the middle of a residential area at least 5 or 6 miles from  I‐10, on the corner of Madison and 58th does not make sense.  Locate it nearer to Thermal Airport the Thermal  Short term rentals   Large tower lights  Many events  365 day operation Short term rentals   Large tower lights  Many events  365 day operation Watch the movie “Keep Squaw True” Although a resident of Colorado I am outraged at the proposed Wave park at Coral Mountain resort. 83% of the  Western States are experiencing drought conditions. California utilizes 15% of the the water available from the  Colorado River. The thought that during these conditions, this water is to be used to create an exclusive  recreational "ocean" in the desert is beyond unreasonable. It is absurdly irresponsible. As a member of a civic  council in my community it is my intention, my responsibility as a concerned citizen to make governmental  agencies and leaders aware of this ridiculous notion regarding the wasteful use of our water supply with the  intent of challenging current laws that entitles California to our vanishing natural resource. wrong location, light and noise pollution, traffic congestion.  This project, as I understand it, only benefits the  wealthy population who are bored with themselves and need distractions, with no regard to others including  wildlife, both animals and vegetation. Traffic, Noise, water usage, and all the others reasons for which we are fighting against this project.  It is  inappropriate to build a huge recreational project in our quiet residential neighborhood. Seniors move here because it's away from noise and clutter.  We moved here and love it like it is because it's  peaceful and quiet.  It's really mostly older people living here.  I was a surfer but I'm now 83, and not interested  in the least. Environmental concerns with too much light at night for night‐hunting animals.  Too much noise, traffic and  bright lights for those of us who moved this far out on purpose for peace, quiet and dark nights where you can  see the stars. NO! We have limited water and with the changing climate the situation will only get worse. Now is not the right time  for this project. A surf park in the desert is a waste of water and resources. Wrong place, wrong time is absolutely correct.  We're in a drought situation people!  Potential for too much  traffic, etc. I’m very concerned about the impact of this unnecessary usage of water. We’re in a drought!! The area impacted is solidly a quiet, residential area. Placing a commercial development of this this type and  magnitude will have a significantly aderse impact on traffic, noise, livability and undoubtedly crime in the area.  WE MOVED TO LA QUINTA AT TRILOGY, FOR PEACE AND QUIET AND REMOTENESS, WITH THE NIGHT SKY. WE  DO NOT ANOTHER DISNEYLAND OR WATER PARK TO DESTROY THE QUIET ENJOYMENT ALONG WITH MORE  TRAFFIC LIGHTS, HIGH LIGHT TOWERS, MASSES OF PEOPLE AND OF COURSE CRIME, BROUGHT TO OUR AREA!!   SINCERELY, RICHARD G. DALE, JD,RESIDENT It's a HUGE waste of water I’m concerned about the 17 80 foot light poles, plus the impact on the wildlife. Also concerned about the  Overuse of water.  Another concern is the noise as well as traffic congestion.  This project does not belong in a  residential area.   Drought is becoming a recurring theme in Southern California, so why on earth would the La Quinta City Council  entertain the idea of a recreational water park that will consume and waste vast quantities of water that are  essential for it's residents continued health and wellbeing.  Not only is this park ill‐advised in this particular  location as it is no where near major transportation arteries, but it will squander a vital resource for our valley.   Will impact my property value.  More traffic and noise and lights shining in our dark sky's Why can't the city of La Quinta act responsibly instead of greedily? Someone needs to stop this foolishness but  everyone wants it to be the other guy. Why not set an example a responsible Civic behavior.  Why can't the city of La Quinta act responsibly instead of greedily? Someone needs to stop this foolishness but  everyone wants it to be the other guy. Why not set an example a responsible Civic behavior.  I have already signed the petition but hope to receive updates and action requests.  There is NO reason to put  an 18 million gallon wave pool in the low desert during a severe drought and increasing global warming and  lessening water supplies.  Zoning should not be changed for this.  The desert is no place for a surf park. The ongoing drought is reason alone to deny this development. The  money could be much better spend on beautifying the desert to attract tourism and support the existing  environment. thanks.  This is an ecosystem nightmare. In an age where we should be considering building corridors for native flora and  fauna we are still allowing strip mining of the desert floor. Did you know the desert topsoil holds more carbon  than the ocean? When you get bulldoze it you realize it. This project is quite excessive and this shows  developers don’t care at all but to make a buck. I don’t see many 40 plus people Flocking to learn how to surf.  So the below 40 demographics are Going to support this financially? Shame to ruin all the desert for a couple  months of Coachella customers. Young people are Coming to the desert for the desert. Are there plans to  relocate the wildlife you will be destirbingnormkeeping any native desert for landscaping or is it another Orange  County landscaper bringing non coachella Valley plants and depleting even more precious water? These  questions really need to be answered to make sense of allowing such a project in this day and age. My first concern is the tremendous waste of drinking water that the Wave will require. Also concerned  regarding the disruption this huge development will bring. People decided to move to this area because is it a  My first concern is the tremendous waste of drinking water that the Wave will require. Also concerned  regarding the disruption this huge development will bring. People decided to move to this area because is it a  This seems to not fit our desert, a wave park in the middle of record drought? Rezoning and mouse and traffic  Rezoning and mouse and traffic  This enormous water park is not a good fit for the desert, especially in this time of extreme drought. This promotes waste of precious resources and irresponsible land use. What a stupid idea.Surely, with Huntington beach, San Diego, Laguna, so close, tourists are going there, not  some dumb hole  in the desert. Really, your city council are donkeys.  Inappropriate use of already stressed water reserves, excessive noise and traffic, light pollution, and harm to  surroundings residents who bought their homes in good faith that the land would remain zoned for residential  This neighborhood is not set up for this kind of resort. Many retired people that live here worked long and hard  for many years to live in a beautiful quiet place like this  don’t want it taken away from them. We are in a major  drought. The streets here will not be able to handle the traffic. We need more open space and less water use. This proposed project does not accomplish either of those things.  Concern for wildlife survival. Increase of traffic and water usage.   Wrong thing to have in a dessert! Noise, Crowds, Traffic, Water resources from aquafer depletion, damage to environment and species. Traffic congestion  Water shortage concerns The wave park is a big water and energy user.  We are not in a position to be wasteful anymore.  Water and  energy are going to be too scarce.    Surfers have plenty of free waves to surf on in California.  The desert is not  a location for surfers. I live in Trilogy because it is in a quiet residential area. I don’t want to live near a commercial development and  have the quiet desert environment destroyed by traffic congestion, noise pollution and light pollution. In  addition, it would be criminal to use the underground aquifer to fill a resort’s wave pool.  To allow rezoning of  this property would be reprehensible on the part of the City of La Quinta. I live in Trilogy because it is in a quiet residential area. I don’t want to live near a commercial development and  have the quiet desert environment destroyed by traffic congestion, noise pollution and light pollution. In  addition, it would be criminal to use the underground aquifer to fill a resort’s wave pool.  To allow rezoning of  this property would be reprehensible on the part of the City of La Quinta. We just purchased our home in Trilogy, La Quinta because of the tranquil location.  We are proud to reside in  the city of La Quinta because of way it is set apart from other local cities being ran by a great city council who  we thought want to preserve the integrity of the city.  This is not a project that reflects what La Quinta is all  We purchased our home at Andalusia with the understanding that the Coral Mountain area would be developed  as a residential community. We would never have purchased if we knew it was going to become a commercial  attraction that will forever change this part of LA Quinta with more traffic, noise and light pollution.  We purchased our home at Andalusia with the understanding that the Coral Mountain area would be developed  as a residential community. We would never have purchased if we knew it was going to become a commercial  attraction that will forever change this part of LA Quinta with more traffic, noise and light pollution.  I moved to La Quinta this year in the Trilogy development at Madison and 60th Street.  I specifically chose to live  in this area because it is away from the city center and is not densely populated.  If the Wave Park, hotels and  short term rentals are built on the land adjacent to my development, the high amount of traffic and people  visiting the park will completely alter what I love so much about this area ‐ quiet, little to no traffic, and low light  and noise pollution.  The proposed land area is not the right place for this park and the developer should not be  granted approval to build businesses (including a water park and hotels, as well as short term rentals).  The land,  which is completely surrounded by residential areas and the mountains, is tucked deep into La Quinta at the  base of Madison Street which is at least 10 miles from I‐10.  A park of this type, which is purported to be  appealing to day trippers, should be built closer to the freeway within a more densely populated area of the  Coachella Valley to provide visitors easier access.  The area surrounding the proposed water park is quiet and  low‐density, and zoning the land located right in the middle of a residential community to including hotels, short  term rentals and a water park will transform this beautiful area of La Quinta into just another highly‐populated  area equivalent to what is north of the 111 with no charm or appeal.  Please, please don't allow this area to  become a Water Park with hotels, businesses and short term rentals. La Quinta La Quinta Water is far too precious to be wasted like this. Shameful!! This project does not match the current uses in the area.  This is a purely residential area and is in no way  compatible with a large amusement park facility. We purchased our home in this area of La Quinta because it is so quiet and tranquil.  Putting this enormous  wave park in a residential part of the City seems ludicrous.  If the City wants to put entertainment, it should be  located in more commercial areas of the City with closer access to transportation, freeways and tourist  COmpletely wrong project for this area Burden on traffic. Noise pollution. Not the right setting for a venue such as this. DRASTIC Water shortage. Will  chase wildlife from their homes and the list goes on.   All of the concerns stated in this saynotothewave.com are extremely important and valid issues. Perhaps most  important is the adverse environmental impact and water useage being proposed during the worst draught in  decades or on record and this would be a totally irresponsible use of water.  This doesn't fit the community at large profile.  We already have StageCoach, Coachella and Iron Man that  impacts the lifestyle of residents that live here.  I am also hugely concerned about the noise impact.  It is quiet  here, you can here the firing range when active, boucing off the mountains.  I lived in San Diego from my surfing  experience, I'd rather drive to the Ocean than to a Surf park that has recycled water. It is a hugh drain on water resources and a pollution on all levels. I grew up in California and spent two of my four undergraduate years at UCSD.  I have relatives in the area and  while I love California (I live in North Carolina now) every time I come back the quality of life has degraded a  little.  The last time we were in North San Diego was 2017 and the traffic at ALL times of day near La Quinta was  horrific.  Plus, water conservation is becoming increasingly important.  Finally, the San Diego area already has  the ocean and that works for surfing just fine...please don't turn La Quinta into a variation on a theme that you  expect in Las Vegas (Mandalay Bay has a man made surf pool)..La Quinta is attractive and desirable as is.  Please  do not let this happen.   I have many concerns about this proposed resort.  Number one is the impact on both noise and traffic.  Number  two is the impact on water consumption.  Number four is the environmental impact this will have on the myriad  of assorted wildlife and plant‐life.   Finally, we are a small bedroom community whose life will be forever  changed in such a negative, irreversible way by this project.  Please do not ignore the detrimental impact this  will have on the citizens of LaQuinta.  The current LaQuinta City Council was elected in good faith by YOUR  citizens!!!  PLEASE DENY THE REZONING APPLICATION FOR THIS PROJECT!!!  I believe this project is a great waste of our precious water resources, especially as our Community faces water  scarcity and climate change. Preserve the privacy as wild life.  This project would put stress on our already limited water supply. It disrupts the natural environment not only in  terms of water but also in obstructing land reserved for animal species. We should not put ourselves or our eco‐ systems in a bad spot just for a new resort. What benefits does it have for the actual citizens in the area? It only  puts more strain on our resources which will only become more endangered due to the climate crisis. This  should not be our priority. This will waste so much water and create too much traffic. There’s no need for a wave pool this size when one is  being built in Palm Springs already. We already have plenty of resorts, and if anything we need more affordable  housing not homes in excess of $2.5 million. I gravely concerned about the domestic water use associated with this project, especially with drought  conditions continuing with no apparent end in sight. In addition, this project will disrupt the surrounding  community with noise, lights at night, and traffic associated with Special Events. The Draft Environmental  Impact Report paid for by the Developer is inadequate. Please retain the current zoning and say no to this  This should not be an option in a time like this considering the fact that we’re in an extreme mega drought.  It is not environmentally sustainable to have a beach in the desert. The proposed resort will solely benefit the  wealthy of the valley, while the marginalized are neglected. Please use your financial resources more  responsibly for the entire community. Using water like this is just irresponsible considering that we are in a desert, in a drought, and in a pandemic.  Now is not the time to waste our resources and add to the destruction of our environment for the benefit of  rich people who want a getaway. if you want waves go to the beach. The animals that will be displaced need to  be protected we need our water to be protected. On top of it all the light pollution will get rid of our wonderful  desert view of the stars.  Using extreme amounts of drinking water for a wave pool is not okay especially when it’s going to be used to  advance only a private organization like the Coral Mountain Resort.  The water usage seems absurd given California’s current climate and the fact that it’s an exclusive club is  unsettling as local residents may not be able to even afford a membership. I am concerned for those members in the community that have built there lives in the valley and rely on the  aquifer to give them water.  I am concerned about the environmental impact a project like this would cause on not only the Coachella valley,  but in the name of climate change in general. Lets build a desert scape golf course at the end of Santa Monica Pier, just for a few eleit to use....   What a waste  of water! The ocean is 2 hours west to surf at.   I may not be a resident of La Quinta but as a socal native and someone who enjoys the natural beauty of the  desert, this project angers me especially because of the water shortage. Such a project will further threaten  water shortages and even create racial disparities between who has access to the water and who doesn’t. Such  a project may even force residents to conserve water while such a facility (mainly for the upper middle class and  above) will not have to abide by water rationing. All in all this project should not have even been considered in  the first place due to the climate‐change exasperated water shortage/drought Its only beneficial for rich people in the valley. Horrible for overall business in in valley  No. Just no. This is not what the desert needs in these trying times.  This project is not only a waste of our resources, but this will negatively impact our environment within the  valley. I was born and raised in the valley and I want to see it prosper. Apart from the negative environmental  impact, this is a private organization that will be used primarily by the wealthy groups and tourists. During one  of the worst droughts, this will do nothing but waste our resources. Please do not allow this. Our youth are  depending on it. I just graduated from UC Irvine  and I want to do everything that I can to give back to this valley  and this is something that is very important to say no to.  This project will only worsen our water crisis and negatively impact our local environment; that being, between  those who are most socioeconomically disadvantaged and the wildlife.  This project represents an enormous waste of our valleys resources. At a time when our leaders should be  seeking out ways to conserve water this project threatens to divert precious drinking water away from farms  and residents to the wealthy few who would have access to this wave pool. Please oppose this project to  conserve water for future generations to come.  Drought, animal habitat, traffic, increase in rent for homes. This is only beneficial to the wealthy  Misuse of pristine mountain location  No  Place for a carnival This Wave resort absolutely does NOT belong in a residential area.  There are many reasons why including the  fact that has been zoned correctly for a reason! Do not let this area become another   Silver Rock or any of the  other started and failed messes that were wrongly approved.  This a neighborhood!  This not a proper  amusement park location.  Please don't allow our neighborhood become a place we don't want to live in.   Biggest concern is the noise and crowds Noise, pollution, traffic, transient people, and Water Shortage. This type of park w/ the number of rentals doesn’t fit the LaQuinta family lifestyle  Traffic will be congested ‐ imagine festival time  wave park? Desert?Drought????  Noise We are a community of retirees, many of whom have health issues.  The traffic, noise, lights and general chaos  that the park will create along with their use of water is most upsetting.  18 million gallons of water when we are in a drought..ridiculous!!! I don’t want to see the added traffic nor do I think this is a responsible project to undertake when California is in  the middle of record drought conditions.  It's a ridiculous proposal and will make La Quinta like amusement park. Traffic...aren't we in a drought?? The proposed rezoning is unreasonable under any interpretation of law.  The proposed development would be  environmentally insensitive, greatly increase use of our precious water and is completely inconsistent with the  LQ Master Plan. 1.Water consumption.  2.Noise pollution.  3.incompatability with all La Quinta has to offer. This is the desert. Water is precious and not to be used for the pleasure of the few. I see no benefit for the local  residents of La Quint  Traffic on Madison It is inconceivable to me that you are even considering this travesty. It will destroy the peace and tranquility of  existing residents, and, most notably, we are in the midst of a DROUGHT!!! La Quinta noise and human pollution environmental and eco disaster in the making.  This in not an area for a  commercial water park of any kind. We’re 2 hours from the ocean, go surf there.  Go to the beach if you want to surf! Don’t use up our water.. I am deeply concerned about the environmental impact. 18 million gallons of water.....we are in a drought...we live in the desert....ridiculous South La Quinta is a residential area. We purchase our home here 5 years ago because it was quiet, open, little  traffic and no commercial areas.  The wave and STVR’s will undo the peacefulness of our community.  Light and  noise polllution as well as excess traffic will change the environment ‐ no longer residential zoning but then  commercial which may open to even more noise and traffic. Facing a drought we should NOT approve this proposed resort. This will be an environmental hazard for wildlife and will bring noise and light pollution to a residential area.  Simple. Wrong concept, wrong venue, for this residential and fragile location.  La Quinta noise pollution light pollution and people pollution waste of water and A body of water that size will  drastically change our ecosystem in this little corner of the valley that is like a bowl of sound and life.. A project  like this would change the future of our peaceful and quiet neighborhood full of wildlife. Say no to wave parks in  the desert… I'm concerned about the noise and additional traffic in the area. This project will bring devastating water losses to the community not to mention absorb traffic to the  surrounding communities.  The lights that will be needed to power this park will destroy natural inhabitants.   The noise that will result from this monstrosity will disrupt local residents as well as natural inhabitants. I am concerned with the traffic and environmental implications of building such a large community. With surf  events thousands of people in will come and already is so much congestion in our area with Stagecoach and  Coachella music festival‘s. The Wave Park will create chaos, noise, lighting and anger to local residents. Save the water for all of us, not a  Water!!! Using the developer's own figures, this wave park will pull about 856,000 gallons a DAY from the CVWD once in  operation ‐‐ in addition to the 18,000,000 gallons it will require during construction. This is entirely  unsustainable in a desert that gets about 6 inches of precipitation a year. The CVWD, on its website, already  says "... our groundwater levels are declining..." and that it gets almost all of its water from the aquifer. Now,  imagine what would happen if this project is approved.  I think it will create lots of noise and light pollution and use way too much water which is already a scarce  commodity. Wave pools are also planned for Thermal and Palm Desert, and the water park in Palm Springs is  being converted into a giant wave pool, so the Valley really doesn’t need another one smack in the middle of  retirement communities. The proposed resort is not in keeping with the residential vibe we seek when buying a home here. Too wild a  development & way too transitory people. This is better suited to Hwy 111 surrounding area not PGA West! The proposed resort is not in keeping with the If we were somewhere else, I'd love this project.  However, in California, where we have ongoing droughts, this  project is totally irresponsible.  It's bad enough that every house in the desert has a swimming pool while there  is also a pool in the center of their development.  Also irresponsible.  Water is precious and we can't live without  it.  Let's not waste it!  I am concerned about the misuse of valuable water resources. This is not appropriate and is completely tone  deaf to the needs of Coachella Valley residents. There are enough tourist attractions, enough country clubs,  enough wasted water on grassy areas such as golf courses. We DO NOT want this. We NEED our residents to be  the focus, NOT tourists.  This sounds like a total nightmare with the potential to ruin the area forever. We already get enough traffic,  noise, and disruption of peace with the Polo Ground festivals and snowbird/tourists during the nice weather  months. We need less come‐and‐go and more sustainable, long‐term thinking for the well‐being of year‐round,  mainstay residents who are the backbone of the economy and life in the area. Let’s protect our water supply  and peace and say no to out‐of‐state, for‐profit developers who don’t have our best interests at heart at all and  would reap a profit without any concern for the impact on our home region.  The area in question was originally zoned low density residential/golf for a reason. And it is for these reasons  that many of us chose to move to La Quinta and purchases homes in this area. The master plan for the City of La  Quinta should be respected and upheld. Changing the zoning at the request of a developer could turn out to be  another disaster like the one La Quinta is already dealing with at SilverRock Resort. Furthermore, the proposed  development will invite transient people into the area, similar to what we get during Coachella, but on a never‐ ending basis. The proposed development will attract people who have no pride of ownership or sense of  responsibility for the area, which will lead to all kinds of problems. Again, just like the two weeks of Coachella.  With people looking to move into this area to get away from large cities, this area of La Quinta has become very  desirable, as evidenced by the increase in home values. It would be more prudent for the City to find a  developer who will adhere to the current zoning and develop a residential community. That will lead to more  tax revenue for the City, and more retail revenue for its struggling business owners, on a sustained basis. Traffic, noise does not fit in with the neighborhood.  We will be directly affected by this development as we are across the road ‐ our backyard will face it and we do  not want the light pollution at night ruining the view we have enjoyed for 10 years.  We also do not want the  noise pollution. Very high noice, traffic and general disturbance concerns for our quiet community.  Zoning for golf course  should be upheld!  A water/surf park in the midst of a growing drought in the desert???  Really??? concern over changing the residential neighborhood. Noise abatement. Crowds, traffic. Bad use for water  supply. Bad optics in drought area. The water impact is terrible. The size and location of this resort is all wrong. As a resident of La Quinta I am  firmly against the Wave Pool development.  Go to the beach if you want to surf! I’m concerned about the constant noise even after construction. This is not the right location for a project like  1‐should be open to the LQ residents only  2‐should shut done all service @8pm  3‐LQ residents should be given  discounted access  The beauty of this valley is the smaller population and the no stress from large crowds of people. The usage of  water could be served in a beneficial way for the community. This is a bad idea on so many levels. We have a water crisis on our hands. Not just the desert but the whole  western United States. This must be stopped. This is the desert….surf at the beach.  Leave our aquifer alone. We are in a drought and don't need another surf park we already have one in PS! We are in a record drought, and this is not necessary for the valley or the la quinta community .. be real please  We do not need to be wasting water! It is not appropriate for the existing lifestyle of the people living here.  Also, not a good use of water in this area. We shouldn’t be adding things to worsen the drought. There’s already so much water wasted on all of our golf  courses, we don’t need another water waster.  Not good for the community. Waste of precious water!!! excess traffic and too many proposed events The negative sound and traffic impact could have been avoided had this been planned in a commercially zoned  area. No properties would have suffered or lives of so many elders negatively affected. So much land is available  near existing businesses there is no excuse to harm so many people who cannot rebuild a lifetime of savings. If the info you provided is correct, the noise level alone would be totally disruptive to humans and wildlife.   The concern for us is water.      The light and noise pollution heavily take away from the reason I live in the area to begin with. I’m all for  developing the area, but not for something that doesn’t contribute to the residents. Also, the amount of water  raises a huge concern, especially with water limitations in our state to begin with. It seems very wasteful. Also  the properties all being allowed to have STRs makes me feel concerned about the safety of the area. There are  amazing things in the valley and other growth opportunities. I don’t find that this development will add to type  of environment that the residents love about the area.  I moved to this location to get away from all the noise and traffic. Now there putting in my back yard. How sad  for all the home owners out here. Zoning is for a purpose.  People need to know that when they committ to a lifestyle baised on the enviroment,  The Zoning will protect their future..... Please don't let this happen! This proposed project is in conflict with our community lifestyle.  Nobody should be alloud to have that much  precious drinking water to stuff their pockets with money.  noise, traffic, lighting...this is a residential neighborhood and should remain the same...please don't change the  zoning..there is no need for this type of development... Chronic drought conditions, unproven wave machine technology, loose environmental and habitat studies  doom this wave park idea. There will be 2 or 3 other sites in other Coachella Valley communities commited to  this trendy, "me too" marketing approach.  Able to forecast vast empty parking  lots surrounding an outsized,  noisy, unsustainable machine in our midst. No thank you.  We are in a water shortage which has not end in sight.  Water in the aquafer's are for residents in all of the  Coachella valley residents and we cannot afford to use this water for a commercial project.  In addition the light,  noise, traffic and trash pollution should not be put in the lap of existing residents.   We do not need any additional noise or traffic in the area.   Noise A young transient (short term rentals) party atmosphere development in the middle of multiple higher end  retirement developments is poor planning at best.  There will be constant conflict and complaints. No to Coral Mountain resort!  Would impact our community, more noise, traffic etc.  It would be like Coachella   Festival all the time. No to Coral Mountain resort!  Would impact our community, more noise, traffic etc.  It would be like Coachella   Festival all the time. Traffic!!!!! This is a totally bad idea in every respect.  There would be a tremendous increase in traffic to the area, and it  would definitely create a huge increase in water usage in an area that already has a water shortage.  We bought  in PGA WEST to live in a fairly quiet and peaceful neighborhood.  We strongly object to a project of this nature  being built in our neighborhood.  If we had wanted to live in an area with lots of transient people we would have  moved to a hotel. We must not let this project take over our peaceful communities.  There would be no way we could live with  this nightmare.  It would be like the Coachella events lasting 365 days a year. Fresh Water is a precious commodity on the planet.  We can’t waste it on senseless projects like this!  Especially  in the desert!  Noise level, traffic, waste of our water supply.  This will ruin our quite community.  Worked very hard to be able to retire  in quit place togeather with many more seniors. We thought we deserve  a place to call home with no noise, traffic, drunken parties, unable to sleep under 80 feet powerful lights, loud  speaker radios. Please help. This project is so wrong on so many levels it baffles me why the city is even considering it. Would the possibility  of tax dollars be more important than protecting thousands of residents peace and serenity? We knew what the  zoning was for this parcel when we bought in trilogy. Please don’t change the zoning for this project that has no  business whatsoever being in our residential neighborhood. I was a union construction worker for 35 years. We  built from San Diego to Sacramento. All we did was class A construction. Never ever ever did we intrude upon  people’s lives with our projects like this would do here. It’s just awful.   Not responsible water use in consideration if climate change — increased traffic.  Would prefer a high end hotel  with golf and pool /spa amenities in stead  I learned to Surf years ago, in Hawaii when I was eleven. I was an avid surfer all the while I lived in Hawaii and  California.  There is mile after mile of surf able coastline on California's Coast.  Why would any sane surfer leave  the Ocean, and come to the Desert to pay to surf on fake waves?  I am now 84 years old and all my neighbors  are around the same age.  I don't want our neighborhood to become a circus of crowds, traffic, noise (especially  at night), Graffiti, and crime all in the name of PROFIT for those who care less what we think.  Your concerned  neighbor, Robin Probst Cocerned about traffic and noise Noise and traffic disruprion.  It wsill be a nightmare for those living near this monstrosity. We have in Trilogy for almost 17 years, and I did not move here to have an amusement park next door. At that  time, and until quite recently, it was zoned for housing and golf. This zoning change will ruin our quiet way of  life, and destroy, at least to some extent, our great community. We call upon the City Council to act responsibly  and STOP this project.  Residents in the local area will lose tremendous amounts of value to their home.  We will not even be able to  get to the grocery store or pharmacy without going the wrong way first. This is not acceptable.  I am concerned about the noise, increased use of our water resources, level of increased traffic, bright lighting  and general disruption this project will bring to our tranquil environment.  It can only have a very negative effect  on our lifestyle! I am concerned about the noise, increased use of our water resources, level of increased traffic, bright lighting  and general disruption this project will bring to our tranquil environment.  It can only totally change our lifestyle  for the worse! A wave park is an obnoxious intrusion on the quiet understated ambiance of the La Quinta Desert landscape.   The misuse of our precious drinking water supply is unconscionable. I am concerned about water waste, traffic and congestion, noise and lights at night. Why spoil the beauty of our  city for the fun of a few entitled wealthy people? La Quinta should not have noisy, high traffic water parks. Taking away our drinking water; it is a viable resource in the desert for survival and to waste it on a wave pool  seems ridiculous! We moved here for the quiet and beauty of the area.  This is the wrong project for this area.  The existing zoning  should stay intact. Water, traffic, incompatibility  Noise, pollution, lights at night, and traffic will all increase and change the area from a desirable place to live, to  a place to avoid. Noise, traffic This project would change to whole environment near our community, with increased traffic, noise and  disruption of our daily life.  We are strongly against this project! This will cause more traffic and a more amusement park atmosphere to our Lovely La Quinta. And an  environmental mess scenic beautiful area of Coral mountains should be earmarked for preservation ;but definitely not a high traffic,  water wasting wave pool enterprise.  It appears to be but another effort to build a tax base at the cost of quality  of life and desecration of natural beauty and natural resources. Another example to create a scar on a place of  pristine beauty and an opportunity to advance in the wrong direction of more and more uncontrolled growth  and development and expansion of the greed for money and cheap stimulus entertainment.  Absolutely absurd  concept with constant draughts and water shortages to entertain such a project....someone should be truly  ashamed and show leadership and stewardship for the environment and the future of our desert.  Since this will be a private resort all the residents of La Quinta will be subjected to the traffic and noise.This  huge reasoning project will change the landscape of the housing in that area. Plus non members receive nothing  in return for this big land development. No! Studied geology, geography and earth science in college.    Most important I'm very familiar with the past  recorded data of Rocky Mountain Snow fall... that is what feeds the Colorado River systems and how as a  consumer state we purchase Coachella Valley water.  Further the Sierra Nevada snow pack provides our  watershed as another water resource.  In no way can we squander these precious resources on wave pools for  the wealthy....    80' towers for what....    What's next special license for Trophy hunting our Bighorn Sheep when  the rich and famous are tired of surfing? Studied geology, geography and earth science in college.    Most important I'm very familiar with the past  recorded data of Rocky Mountain Snow fall... that is what feeds the Colorado River systems and how as a  consumer state we purchase Coachella Valley water.  Further the Sierra Nevada snow pack provides our  watershed as another water resource.  In no way can we squander these precious resources on wave pools for  the wealthy....    80' towers for what....    What's next special license for Trophy hunting our Bighorn Sheep when  the rich and famous are tired of surfing? More info please I moved to this particular area of La Quinta for the peace and solitude after living in New York, London and Hong  Kong. The only thing I see from my patio is the golf course and mountains — no houses or roads. The only thing I  hear are birds, dogs, lawnmowers and the occasional coyote. The proposed wave park & its lights would be  visible from my house. The music would be heard from my patio. This would severely affect my quality of life.  Please don’t allow this monstrosity to be built! It will deplete our water supply in the middle of a record‐ breaking drought and forever ruin the gorgeous landscape.  I'm not against change and future development, but your argument about bad timing really resonated with  me... especially the (lack of) water issue. La Quinta’s  reputation has continued to grow as a Superior Quality town to visit and live in. This ridiculous  proposal does not sync with a high quality community  like ours. By even considering this I’m afraid you are not  a very intelligent or maybe a corrupt board member and will dig into your decision at the time for your  individual re‐election.  Incongruent with the current zoning and atmosphere of LaQuinta, not to mention the adverse impact on the  environment.  Wrong place for this type of amusement center.   If there is in fact a water shortage, there is no way you can approve this project.  We already have too many short term vacationers coming to LaQuinta and changing the nature of the  community.  Our neighborhood is entirely different than it was when we bought twenty years ago.  It is constant  partying, noise and disrespect for neighbors and the formerly peaceful environment.  Coachella and Stagecoach  are bad enough.  Don’t add to the problem. The more I read the less I like this idea.  Water is a problem for the desert and a wave park does not seem to be  the best use of it.  I live very close to the site and would not welcome the impact to the neighborhood. Waist of much needed Water in All Coachella Valley.   The many drawbacks of this project have been perfectly outlined by the LQRRD.  How anyone can even consider  constructing a wave park during an ongoing drought, is unfathomable to me.  Wake up.  This is an all‐around  losing proposition. This Project is a square peg in a round hole.  It does not fit as it would require the "injection" of this tourist  commercial zoned Project amongst existing quiet residential communities. This rezoning proposal is not in  keeping with the city's own 2035 General Plan. We are in the the midst of a mega drought with no end in sight.   Please keep this area zoned low density and develop responsibly taking into account all potential impacts. Why is these projects being proposed in our communities.    You are making La Quinta in to a Disney Land. This  will destroy the very reason most of us moved here. This is an irresponsible act on the part of La Quinta Council.   Wrong project for our City and the environment!  We barely have enough water for our community! Since we are in the middle of a MEGA DROUT!!  It makes NO SENSE  to have a Wave Pool here.  Please make the  right decision and vote NO for people in La Quinta who voted for you.  Thank you I am absolutely opposed to any re‐zoning efforts attempted by the city council, particularly from existing  residential to commercial. I do agree with the fact that this development does not belong there; not to mention  the current drought situation we are in. Concerned about increased traffic on Madison and wasting our drinking water to fill the wave park.  Drought and climate changes mandate proactive community water use and management. This wave resort an  example of private resorts consuming ostentatious amounts of public water.  There is no valid reason to change the zoning on this property. It is in direct conflict with the existing  surrounding residential neighborhoods and does nothing to enhance the livability of La Quinta. Please continue  to serve the interests of the people you represent not the interest of outsiders who look only to profit  monetarily and will negatively impact people who bought here in good faith that we could expect future  development to be compatible with the existing area based on the City of La Quinta’s codes and zoning. Please  vote NO ON PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY TO TOURIST COMMERCIAL! Thank you  There is no valid reason to change the zoning on this property. It is in direct conflict with the existing  surrounding residential neighborhoods and does nothing to enhance the livability of La Quinta. Please continue  to serve the interests of the people you represent not the interest of outsiders who look only to profit  monetarily and will negatively impact people who bought here in good faith that we could expect future  development to be compatible with the existing area based on the City of La Quinta’s codes and zoning. Please  vote NO ON PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY TO TOURIST COMMERCIAL! Thank you  1. We are in the midst of a drought.  2. It is beautiful open space.  3. Noise and traffic impacts   This land was not meant to be used for commercial zoning for a water park so close to private communities. It  would be very disruptive and devastating for our community.  We are already in the midst of a climate crisis.  Please keep the peace of La Quinta.  We moved here for that.  The precious aquifer is limited and cannot in  good conscience be used for this.  This water park proposal is not wisely  thought out. Sounds like it is only to benefit the group building it. It won’t be a plus to the community. I think there are  enough rentals in the area already.  Water usage and shortage thereof, is my main concern for the future of our community. We bought out here because of the residential zoning.  It assured us of quiet and low traffic flow.  Plunking this  down in the middle of residential zoning and changing the city zoning plan to accommodate it is just wrong.   All of the impacts to our community would be extremely negative. Resources are already very limited and this  would only add strain and further cripple if not crumble our community.  In addition all of our roads are  extremely deteriorated and once again this would make road conditions worse. We recently purchased our home in La Quinta for the specific reason that it is a peaceful and quiet community  with little to no traffic. Building this resort would bring noise and traffic, and disruption to our communities.  The current water quality in the lower Coachella Valley is not adequate for this vast project.  Most of the  drinking water comes from north of highway 111.  This project will put a strain on the aquifer.    1) this is a tranquil residential area that should remain as such.  2) given the current and likely future drought  conditions any new developments such as this are irresponsible.   Water usage. Crowds in area Why would anyone with a brain want this despicable proposal to go through? Greed over the survival of life as  we know it in our lovely town is at stake here. God help us all with this kind of thinking by our elected officials.   We must all make waves now to stop any of this from happening.   too much water use in an already water depressed area; too much disruption to the land and nature; too much  added traffic and people to the area; The project should not be in a residential neighborhood. It would cause noise & light pollution. The desert  climate is not ideal considering the drought we are experiencing. This project does not look to be in the best interest of the residents of La Quinta.   It’s impact on traffic, noise,  construction and environment is out of character with the neighborhood environment.   This is not the area for  this type of project.   Thank you.  this proposal is disgusting. It is gross. It is an environmental NIGHTMARE for all of the Coachella Valley residents.  With  scarce and dwindling fresh water   supplies, La Quinta and the entire Coachella Valley will face the same  fate as the failed Salton Sea resorts, but on a faster timeline. Boondoggle.      I can’t expound any better than what has been shown on your site. I live in Palm Desert but am in LaQuinta  frequently every week and would never want to see traffic congestion, lack of respect for our oloeacefyl  environment, and horrible bright lights. The tennis garden is bad enough. No more of this…..ever. Doesn’t fit a residential neighborhood  Doesn’t fit a residential neighborhood  This really doesn't fit with the location which is otherwise a quiet and dark at night residential community. I think this project is irresponsible and could leave LQ residents in bad shape in a few years. We’re already in a  severe water drought, why exacerbate the problem? Not to mention, more housing for the ultra rich? Why not  make housing & recreational parks that can be used by average coachella valley residents and not just the ultra  rich? Our local environment cannot possibly sustain the added strain on our water source as we have been under  water use reduction due to drought. Local residents do not want the increased traffic, noise, and problems that  STVR inherently bring, the lack of common sense that party lifestyles ensue, the added crime that statistically  results, the litter, the pollution, the loss of tranquility near the mountains protecting our wildlife and the  overwhelming public nuisance that such an expansive development produces. This development is not for the  local residents. It is reserved for the elite that can afford the astronomical costs and does not bring enough  financial incentive to our local economy to diminish all of problems it ushers in. My main concern is the water issue.  We are looking at very serious times ahead regarding this drought. It just  doesn’t make sense La Quinta Noise, traffic, light pollution, and this project will use too much of our precious water. Think of your  children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren. Please no. Do what you know is the right thing for the  community and our critical water supply. Global warming is upon us. Do not acerbate the problem. Be a solution  Has IID signed off on this project? I adamantly oppose this development based upon severe  drought conditions, and the points listed.  I agree totally with all sentiments that are outlined in opposing this development.    Too high of density project for this beautiful area Too high density for this beautiful area We can only hope Council would not consider a wave pool and more STVR's near PGA West.  We have so much  disruption curing Coachella concerts, we certainly do not want more noise and traffic and certainly no more  STVR's.  Please do not approve the rezoning request! La Quinta this is a horrible idea   ‐drought  ‐energy shortage   ‐traffic  ‐24/7 spring break type partying  ‐stvr bring  crime & noise   ‐ destroys our beautiful desert Mountain View   ‐ no more peaceful golf communities  This project is totally unacceptable considering the state of climate change occurring here in the Coachella  Valley, the entire southwestern U.S., and indeed, the world. Noise & traffic pollution As it stands now I can hardly exit PGA West with the traffic impacts on Madison. I also oppose the wave park  development die to concerns over any plan that will use copious amounts of water. This proposed project is also  geared to be exclusive, to members, meaning only the wealthy need apply. The developers of this project can  take this proposed plan to another area, We don't want or need in La Quinta!! Quality of life issues are  threatened as well as major environmental ones. HELP. SAY NO!!!   This project is ill‐conceived and environmentally irresponsible.  Please do not rezone and allow this to happen. This is a quiet residential area.  Allowing the rezoning and water park not only would disrupt the existing  residential area and change its character forever; but it would be an irresponsible thing to do environmentally.   Please do not allow this to happen. From quiet residential to noisy commercial.  Also, what happened to the water shortage problem? Noise, light pollution, water use, traffic. All big problems!! your website says it all, a change in zoning goes directly against the City of LaQuinta's current master plan and  will change the character of LaQuinta permanently We, as year around residents of PGA West for 20 years have recently fought a hard battle to limit short term  rentals & “vacation” destinations in our city. Corsl Mt Resort & The Wave are precisely the genre of  development we do not want in our vicinity. Time to move if this is approved.  We, as year around residents of PGA West for 20 years have recently fought a hard battle to limit short term  rentals & “vacation” destinations in our city. Corsl Mt Resort & The Wave are precisely the genre of  development we do not want in our vicinity. Time to move if this is approved.  It is preposterous that they would waste our valuable drinking water for someone to surf!? That is just  obscene!! Who even thought this was a smart idea in a DESERT?! Please call or me or email me as I would love  to discuss. If I even PROPOSED these Shenanigans at our business in Orange County they would have my head!!!  How did this even get this far? And the sad thing, is that we are second home residents. So without locals telling  us what is going on, we would have no clue. Shame on you for being shady! I know you won’t contact me as I  am against the project, but as a business owner, think about your community for god sakes! The complete waste of water. And it’s private. But really to waste that much water is a joke.  La Quinta For all of the above noted reasons. Ownership in residential areas should be protected from all commercial activities that would lessen their quality  of life. This covenant between the city and their citizens should never be violated.  This project has no place in our community. Many reasons: increased traffic,noise; water usage. Change from  quiet residential to commercial,recreational.  Water, traffic, light pollution  Too much traffic. Too many non residents in short term rentals.  Water is an issue and now is not the time for  this type of project     I feel that the city has allowed unfettered development that is putting severe strain on our water reserves at a  time when the the whole state of California is undergoing a severe long term drought. We have no certainty of  water from the reserve at Lake Mead. our aquifers are being depleted at an unprecedented rate .The Coral  Mountain development will put a further strain on this very dire situation.   The area will become very  congested and the quality of the quiet serene lifestyle will be disrupted by constant traffic and commotion  associated with the resort development. I am seriously considering other options if this development comes to  fruition   Sincerely   Balmukund Patel  Sunali Patel    54259 Southern Hills  La Quinta    92253   This permit to change the zoning should not be allowed! Zoning laws are established for a reason. Changing  those laws is unfair to home owners who invested in their property when the zoning laws were established.  Changing them for obvious monetary reasons is disingenuous, and should be done for only responsible reasons  and not affect in an adverse way long term owners of property who depended on the existing zoning rules when  they invested in the City of La Quinta. DO YOUR JOB and reject this rezoning request! Against Shirt term vacation rentals Against Shirt term vacation rentals Sixteen years ago my wife and I purchased our home in LA Quinta with the goal of a quieter life style. We were  currently living in the Los Angeles area raising our young kids and La quinta was our get way from a hectic life of  LA. Please don't ruin this by over building or changing the type of environment hundreds of retired people flock  to each year for respite and relaxation.  The most important reason for not allowing this Wave Resort is because we are in a desert which happens to be  in a severe drought.  That wave pool will use thousands of gallons of water that can, most certainly, be used for  much better purposes.  We property owners will likely be asked to conserve our water if not restricted or  charged higher fees. The other reasons are the added traffic and noise it will bring to these residential  too severe a change for our community. we don't need this development. esp the use of water is of concern To my understanding there are four wave parks planned for the Coachella Valley. It makes more sense to  develop such attractions in non residential areas such as the one slatted for Thermal. We have already been  down the road of the problems with sort term rentals and now we are faced with this issue again. Our son is a  world class professional surfer that operates a surf school on Maui and the west coast of California so we are  very familiar with the surf industry. I am familiar with the success of Kelly Slater's surf ranch in northern  California. It is not however located in a residential area. While I am not opposed to this type of attraction I am  definitely opposed to the location and the impact that it will have on our community. The proposed development does not fit into La Quinta’s low density residential environment. Further it will  illuminate Coral Mountain and what remains of our dark sky.  We came there because we love the desert.  Not development! The Coachella Valley hardly needs a 4th water park, and certainly not in a residential area! A commercial operation of the magnitude (size, volume, noise) in a residential and natural park area is ill‐ advised, and undermines that natural environment being preserved and the solid tax base of the residential  area.  Surely there are other viable locations for a commercial water park than in a neighbourhood and near  designated park lands. I HAVE BEEN UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT “SILVERROCK RESORT” WOULD SUFFICE OUR NEED FOR  ADDITIONAL RESORT PROPERTIES.   La Quinta Would destroy the peacefulness of a residential area.  We LOVE the tranquility of La Quinta and purchased our home to escape the rat race of Orange County. Please  keep our community a center for quiet recreation and relaxation. Too much water usuage Too close to residential areas. Need to find land in commercial zoned area.   California is in a serious drought situation and there is no reason to believe that this will that this will not  continue.  Water has to be conserved for residents and existing farms. La Quinta we don't need this kind of development in LaQuinta Too many STVR. We don't need another weekly Coachella Festival in town. Let us enjoy where we live. The density of the people who would be brought in would impact neighbors with regards to noise, large groups  of teenagers lowering quality of life for current residents.  Also the West is experiencing drought conditions!  This is a huge waste of of limited, precious natural resources. Everything about this development would negatively impact La Quinta and it’s residents.  I am totally against  this for many reasons and also that it will it impact my investment in my home. Disturbing the peaceful neighbourhood Noise carries today from the park when events are held . Traffic on Madison would be a nightmare with all of  the housing in the plan . Please deny the rezoning request .  This project will make this area untenable.  it's 100% out of character for the area.  Much better suited north of  10 FWY area. Roads are not built for that much traffic and we are very concerned about the noise of the pumps and jet skis ,  this is a golf community and will devalue the homes in the area  Concern of the water that will be needed for this project.  Concern of the traffic.  Concern of the light towers. Noise, nighttime light. Completely ruining the area for the residents who chose it for peace and serenity.  Put  this development out by highway 10 where it belongs. This beautiful piece of property, supported by the Coral Mountain, home for many Big Horn sheep and other  desert wildlife, should not be zoned commercial for the purpose of a project such as the Wave!  This is a quiet  residential area.  That’s why we all moved out here.  We’ve been a resident since 2006.  It’s unconscionable to  us that the City Council would approve a project that would require so much water from our already lowered  reserves, for a commercial thrill park, while threats of limiting our personable water use in the State and the  raising of our rates, are real.  The noise level a project such as this would create is just unthinkable for this highly  residential area.  The WAVE will generate an unacceptable noise level for the thousands of home owners from  early morning to late at night, every day and every night. Not to mention the sound from the concerts and  special events they will be holding.  Our traffic will increase with short term, rental seeking participants.  This is  not what you sold us on when we bought our home in 2006, in the beautiful GEM, La Quinta.  We beg you to  We do not want the traffic on Madison street, we do not want the noise in our peaceful community.  Since the area is zoned residential I have no problem with a additional home development I do have a problem  with the commercial aspect of the wave park,hotel and short term rentals Drought. This benefits very few people. They can surf in the ocean as GOD intended.  A waterpark is not what we need in our desert community due to water conservation / concern alone! We are in a drought water area. Why waste water on a surf park!!! Has anyone written to the CA Water Board?  They are encouraging people to conserve water. I agree, wrong venue at the wrong place at the wrong time!!!!!! Completely inappropriate use of water in the desert. Gluttony at its finest. 1. No benefit to the larger community. This is for wealthy resort residents only. 2. Wave park when we are in a  drought? 3. Noise, traffic, lights...it goes on.  With our constant water issues, the proposal of a wave/surf park in the desert is laughable.  Those who think  this is a good idea should be shamed.  We are in a desert where there is always a concern for water.  We are always in conserve mode with droughts.   Water rates keep increasing and usage allowances are not attainable (as methods to help users conserve).   Another development adding more stress to our water system is a bad move.  Adding a water consuming  wave/surf park in the desert is beyond ironic, it is foolish and a terrible idea.  This project originally was planned and presented to be a much smaller venue, and the homesites, hotel were  promised to be very high end.  The homesites were to be large, and the hotel was to be a 2 story boutique  hotel.     Current plans are to be very noisy, unsightly lights, and extended hours of wave operation.     Will take  down property values for all Country Club developments in the area; as well as private homes along 58th. to the  Quarry Country Club.  Not proper planning for City Council to approve this project.   Please deny rezoning. I'd like to understand why LQ Council thinks such switching zoned (quiet) residential property for a noisy, light‐ polluting water park located deep into the South of LQ makes sense.  It sure doesn't to me. Vacation rentals ? When valley cities are curtailing VRs. Lights, noise and traffic in a community developed  around quiet non commercial guidelines. It’s a terrible idea to put this into this area of the city or anywhere other than on the north side of Hwy 10! This  is such a ridiculous idea I can’t believe it has gotten this far! NO TO THE WAVE PARK!! PLEASE!! Retired here for the peace and quiet. This will be destroyed by the building of this adventure park. Indio Too much noise  We have much better ways to use our water resources.  Why am I replacing lawn and counting toilet flushes if  we are letting a giant wave pool be built.   This project would bring unwanted traffic, noise pollution and would disrupt the peace of the surrounding areas.  Please deny the request.  This is the wrong state and wrong area for such a project.  Needs to be in a state with no water issues.  We  should all be aware this is not California! Surrounding homeowners adjacent to the site purchased their homes with the understanding that the site  would be residential, not commercial. It is unfair and deceptive to existing La Quinta residents if the zoning is  changed! And stating the obvious, it would be extremely tone deaf on the part of city officials to allow a water  park when California and Riverside County are in the midst of a mega‐drought! Please show common sense and  vote NO to re‐zoning the site! The climate is changing, growing hotter and drier in this area. Human‐caused emissions play some role in this.  Adding a theme park that requires large amounts of water and depends on car travel for clientele is  irresponsible and ultimately unsustainable.  Do not allow this development simply for short‐term gain (greed). Too big of a project, too much traffic and noise, destroys our quiet community, uses too much water, not good  for the environment, etc. etc. Too much traffic and too much noise!! We have loved the quite and the starry skies with no lights!! This is  a complete waste of water, California is in a drought. I don't want it in my area. There are already going  to be two others through out the Valley.....thats enough. Also, it's private for guest and timeshare holders only,  not for public use.  There is plenty of available land for a wave park away from residential areas. This would have a negative impact  on the local residents. The environmental impact on the aquifer is huge.  The aquifer supplies the whole Coachella Valley, not just La  Quinta.  The evaporation factor further impacts the amount of water usage. The energy usage to generate  "waves". has another impact on our community.   I believe this is an issue that should be voted upon by the  entire water‐using population of Coachella Valley. This is the wrong area for a project of this kind, it should be closer to Highway 111 or I‐10.  The area is all homes,  so the zoning should stay residential/golf course or neighborhood type of businesses.  I believe it will make our  property value decrease because of the increase in traffic, short term vacationers, light pollution and noise.  I'm  not against the area being developed but develop it for what it is zoned for.   I have read that there are like  three other wave parks in the valley, don't know if that is true but if it is isn't that enough. A surf pool in this heat and in this drought is just RIDICULOUS A short‐sighted, impractical resort town project that will prove to be an irreversible problem for this community  in years to come! I am opposed to the Coral Mountain  rezoning  for many reasons     1.  We made an investment in an unfinished  project in  La Quinta in 2009 .  With the zoning in effect to be low density residential not tourist /commercial   that is a big rezoning        2.  According to an article in the Sacramento Bee April 16 2020, California and the West  suffering from the worst Megadrought in centuries.  The wave pool just itself will initially use 18 million gallons  of water from where?   As well as the proposed 150 hotel rooms and 500 STVR and residential components.   Where will this water come from?  At least some of it from the water that the residents of the CVWD saved by  conserving water because WE LIVE IN A DESERT.  I guess we conserved enough water to now waste this water?          3.  I live on Madison Street.  Who ever did the traffic analysis not certainly did not survey me.  It is ludicrous to  say there would be minimal impact.  The amount of traffic would certainly increases with just the impact of the  hotel and STVR.  In addition all the service vehicles and supply and service employee would at least double that  amount.  if not more.  Who did this survey?  There are probably better situated sites near I 10 that could handle  this type of traffic and development        4.  I thought that La Quinta had a dark sky ordinance.  The 17,  80 foot  light towers does not seem to fit that ordinance but it seems the dark sky ordinance was removed May 4 2021         5.  What impact would all of this have on the adjacent wilderness area and the protected Desert Bighorn Sheep  in the adjacent wilderness.  I walk on the proposed area almost daily and though I am certainly not an expert I  have seen evidence of the Desert Bighorn Sheep using that area      6,  What impact would this development  have on the adjacent archeological and petroglyphs sites ?      7,  The 1 to 2 million additional revenue would  certainly  not be worth it keeping La Quinta the Gem of the Desert.  The saying if the offer is too good to be true  it probably is not       8.  KEEP LA QUITA THE GEM OF THE DESERT This is the wrong project for this area, at the wrong time.  In the middle of one of the worst droughts in history.   We do not need or want another amenity for the very rich who will tire quickly of another new fad, and we, the  long time full time residents, will be left with another incomplete, unusable project.  They say they use less  water than a golf course ‐ a poor comparison as many golf courses are closing or struggling to stay open as the  sport loses popularity.  The zoning attracted many others to our stable, lovely communities, knowing our  investment in a beautiful quiet nature filled place would be honored by the town's original zoning.  The various  projects that have dragged on for years, such as Silverrock, should be a warning of what is to come.  Please do  not rezone this land and give a green light to this unwanted project.  The recent report issued by the developer  is filled with "holes" and incorrect information.  On top of it, similar projects are being built in adjacent areas.   Please listen to our petition, and thank you for your consideration. Water shortages, waste of water, noise  Water shortages, waste of water, noise  Water shortages, waste of water, noise  Water shortages, waste of water, noise  Complete waste of water in the middle of a historic drought … NO  Traffic, crime, degrading home values! Totally flies in the face of conserving water and energy as well as puts an amusement style park in the middle of  multiple retirement communities. I just find it incredulous that this is even being considered.  The Coral Mountain Resort rezoning proposal is simply irrational and irresponsible.     This project would  threaten depletion of La Quinta’s  and the Coachella Valley’s underground water resource. It will have a long‐ term negative impact on the entire La Quinta community.      The Wave project will bring increased noise,  disruptive nighttime light, and more traffic,     It will change the peaceful atmosphere and environment which  drew so many to live in La Quinta.     I strongly encourage the City Council to deny the rezoning for the Wave  NOISE. The decibel levels will be beyond the current ag levels and for residential  that are currently zoned now.    We moved to Trilogy for the amenities which include seeing stars at night (without glaring lights) and away from  traffic and noise pollution.  Please stop this rezoning which will affect our lifestyle and more importantly defies  all logic about conserving our water resources.   It is ridiculous to consider changing zoning from residential to commercial. We did our homework before  purchasing and bought in the area because it was quiet and peaceful and would never have considered doing so  if any such zoning was allowed. There are multiple other reasons it should not be allowed (water use, light  pollution, noise, traffic) as well. This will destroy our community. It will ruin the tranquil and private feel of the residential area. Not the element needed in the City of La Quinta;  especially the Southeast more upscale region.  This whole area is a residential area and to put in 4 story commercial is not acceptable We are in drought and the thought of a wasteful water park is not in our best interest.  The development will  add too much noise as well as traffic to the area.  The location of the proposed wave park is currently zoned “Low Density Residential, Open Space‐Recreational”  which is consistent with the design and use of existing adjacent residential communities and those being  planned.       The location, size, design and operating characteristics of this proposed project are not compatible  with existing and future land uses.  Furthermore, the project will create traffic, lighting and noise conditions  which will negatively impact adjacent residential communities.  I hope you will consider a different and  appropriate location for this project other than the center of residential communities.   Traffic, noise, litter, commercialism, and environmental issues.  Wrong place to have a noisy, with traffic faciity.  This is a quiet 55+ residential area. In the face on a major drought in California proceeding with this project is a major mistake. As residents we will  be asked to conserve water including such simple things as not running outdoor fountains due to evaporation.  Can you imagine  how much water will be evaporated every day from the wave basin.   The Council has been  dealing with the issues and problems of STR’s. This project is also proposing part time rentals!   Lastly, with  several other similar water wave projects proposed in the Coachella Valley, what is the likelihood that this  project including the sale of  million dollar homes will be financially  viable.  At least Walt Disney built Disney World and Disneyland by not impacting the residential zoning.  He was smart  enough to purchase the project property and the property around his.  This project is in the existing residential  zone.  My guess is that the council has already been approached by the Slater people.  The Slater Group would  not spend millions of dollars to speculate on a project this size without some indication that it would be  approved.  Typical politicians getting rich and ignoring their constituents concerns.  Lets be sure to vote them  out after they pass the project. We are heading into the worst drought in California history.  The politicians can not even save the Salton Sea.   The Salton sea is turning into hazardous waste zone that will also impact the Coachella Valley.  The proposed  project does not belong in a residential zoned area.  There is a lot of vacant acreage in more rural areas.  Why  should the existing residents suffer from the greed of politicians that do not even live in the immediate area.   Every council member who votes for this project to continue should be voted out of office.  Check their bank  Huge waste of water, noise factor to our community + traffic increase.  We do not want to live in a community near the proposed resort.  We want the La Quinta City Council to deny  the Coral Mountain Resort rezoning.  This is the wrong choice for our community.  We are now in a drought  situation‐‐this rezoning doesn't make sense. Too many serious concerns to mention! The property was zoned correctly in the first place. We certainly don’t  need a noisy , dirty, water guzzling park in our beautiful city! Please don’t put this place on our land, la Quinta is known for its peace and calm and remote feeling, away from  the crowd. It doesn’t belong here. This is the most beautiful and precious land we have left. It is nestled right  here against out desert mountains among family neighborhoods. This would destroy our calm little area of the  desert. The light pollution, the water waste, the land waste, all going in the wrong direction of our present day  needs.   PLEASE STOP THIS FROM HAPPENING TO OUT COMMUNITY! Please Don’t let this happen to us!  Many Trilogy residents bought here because we liked the peace and quiet away from all the NOISE. All of our  residents are 55+ and we retired to peace and quiet. This water park does not belong in this tranquil  environment. Jane Balmer and Greg Potter We moved here for what La Quinta had to offer!    Keep La Quinta the "Gem Of The Dessert!".    Do not give in  to the pressure from the big money developers!    If you do what is right you will be able to look at yourself in  the mirror and be proud of yourself! La Quinta I am totally against this wave park in La Quinta! It will destroy our neighborhood! So very tone deaf to waste water on a surfing pool 100 miles from the ocean.   We are in a severe drought  We are in severe drought conditions. The water usage is unreasonable and irresponsible for this size of a project  and infrastructure. We moved here because it's peaceful. This project will take away that serenity. Also a sad waste of water. We  are in a drought and proposing using that amount of water for unheard of recreation in the middle of the desert  is just environmentally negligent. There are so many other places people can go for surfing and watersports. We  should be focused on preserving the natural beauty of our desert. Our hard earned dollar laquinta should be respected as we invested in a place to retire. Let us enjoy what ever  we have time left. I am concerned about this project for a number of  reasons, but foremost among them: It is inconsistent with  existing zoning; the devloper's proposed change in zoning is inconsistent with the neighborhood; light pollution  from 80' light poles; the effects on traffic, particularly during mass special events; and what appears to me to be  a monumental waste of our precious water resources.  Please do not approve this zoning change and project. Do not want our valuable and threatened drinking water wasted. We moved from PGA West to The Quarry to get away from the noise and STVR's.  I am so upset to think you will  allow Merriweather to rezone an area for a project like Coral Mountain.  It goes against the surrounding  residential neighborhoods.  If approved you will have introduced an enormous water basin that is unacceptable  to open during a drought and will use an enormous amount of water, increased noise levels all day, light  pollution, increased traffic.  I did not move to The Quarry to have this amusement park open in y backyard.  The  natural beauty of Coral Mountain and its views will be gone forever.   We never would have moved to The  Quarry if we knew such a project was being considered.  I beg you ro reconsider approving this project.  I do not  want to live around years and years of Merriweather building this project. Noise factor and water conservation This proposal to use this high volume amount of water, when water is in such demand already in our community  is so reckless. The only possible reason that I can fathom is that someone is expecting a huge pay off !!  Please  think of the rest of us and do the right thing for the community that you took an oath to serve. WE DID NOT MOVE TO LA QUINTA TO HAVE A DISNEYLAND TYPE PARK NEXT TO THE WILDNESS OF THE DESERT  WITH A BEAUTIFULY NIGHT SKY!  SHAME ON A DEVELOPER TRYING TO THIS TO A WELL ESTABLISHED SMALL  TOWN THAT ENJOYS THE REMOTE DESERT SURROUNDING AND LESS TRAFFIC AND PEOPLE.  THIS WOULD ALSO  BRING MORE CRIME TO THE AREA; NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.  SO PLEASE, LETS REMAIN A SMALL TOWN WITHOUT  ALL THE OUTSIDE NEGATIVE INFLUENCES A PROJECT OF THIS NATURE WOULD CERTAINLY BRING!  SINCERELY,  RICHARD DALE,JD. If would forever change the peaceful tranquility of La Quinta! As a proud member of the La Quinta Community I strongly oppose the re‐zoning proposal. We have a quiet  peaceful community. Many of us have retired here and we chose it for the tranquility. We want it to remain that  way. There is a drought.  This is a desert.  Other ill thought out wave parks have failed.  Learn from history.  Protect  your community. The proposed resort is sure to bring more noise, more traffic and more pollution to our quiet and beautiful  community.   Do not forget that we live in a drought  environment.  Our water levels are dropping every year..   and you. Want to put in a large water wasting wave pool!!   ????????? The proposed resort is sure to bring more noise, more traffic and more pollution to our quiet and beautiful  community.   Do not forgetCancel WATER, WATER, WATER!!!!   Surf park not needed in this city. Save water for our farms.  Please consider We bought our home in Trilogy in 2005   so we could spend our retirement years in an area of breathtaking  beauty and peaceful quiet. PLEASE NO WATERPARK!!!! Do not destroy the last few years of my life by taking  away  the dream of a lifetime. The letter in Nextdoor said it all.  It's not needed in our neighborhood.  It's not needed at this time of severe  water  shortages throughout the state.   I am concerned mostly with the water issue. Our area is suffering from extreme drought with no end or solution  in sight and I feel this project will only exacerbate this crisis. This not a necessary project for our community.  Dear City Council members,   Several weeks ago I listen to a presentation on the  proposed Coral Mountain  wave park presented by Meriwether developers.   After listening to the presentation and two comments and  questions by informed community residents,  it quickly became very clear to me that this wave park proposal is  the wrong development at the wrong time in the wrong place.  • The developer made it clear that the operating  hours will be from 7 AM to 11 PM 365 days per year   • based on questions from residents,  The developer  eluded to the fact that live large events will take place much more frequently than the advertise four times per  year.  • Sports venues and activities initially mentioned is just the beginning,  additional events and activities will  be added overtime.  • The venue is a strictly private enterprise with no use or benefit to the outside community  whatsoever.  • noise from loud speakers music venues wave announcements etc. is a reality.  • based on  comments questions and facts presented by knowledgeable residents, it appears the water use calculations are  grossly under stated  and the water used will come directly from our drinking water aquifers .   As a La Quinta  resident I cannot imagine a more irresponsible use of our precious natural resource .....water!   • climate change  is real!   • The drought is real!   • water conservation is part of life now and will continue to be in the future .    The proposed wave park project should not be built anywhere in the Cochella Valley, anywhere in the state of  California anywhere in the western United States or water is a problem,  it would be irresponsible  and  reprehensible  to allow this project to move forward.   I urge the La Quinta city Council to act responsibly and  protect the well‐being of La Quinta and Coachella Valley citizens by not wasting our precious water supply,  in  exchange for money. Shame on you!   I urge you to deny the zoning change that would allow this project to  move forward.  JUST SAY NO!  Thank you,  Sylvia K Lasser  81401 Golden Poppy Way       This Water Park is very irresponsible project.  I know you realize we are in a major drought so DO THE RIGHT  THING AND VOTE NO!!! I am strongly against this water park in our peaceful desert retirement community. The noise pollution and light  pollution will be unavoidable, along with the negative impact on our scarce water resources. This is the wrong  project in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Noise, light pollution, increased traffic, waste of water in a severe drought situation. We’re in the middle of a 20 year drought.  We should not be building these things in the desert and certainly not  in a residential area.  THIS WILL ROB US OF OUR PEACE.  PLEASE GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.  WHERE THERE ARE THE TEENS WHO WILL  LOVE YOUR PARK.  No to taking water from our aquafer for needless recreation. There are many issues of concern related to the proposed area adjacent to our home at Trilogy:  *excessive use  of water in our drought ridden valley  * noise/ night lighting from Surf area  *increase of construction traffic  during building of the   development   *viability for development to be sustainable  Palm Desert    Impacts community, & wildlife dramatically   Palm Desert    Not appropriate to impact the community and environment in such a dramatic way.  Not a good fit for the communities surrounding this location especially a 55+. Noise is by far #1, the destruction  or lack of preservation of Coral Mtn is #2 which serves hikers, runners, bikers, horseriders, history buffs, artists  and others, not to mention the beauty of it. #3 is opens the door for pushing the limits set such as noise,  lighting, activities, # of people etc. Who's going to keep it in check?  This simply is not the place for it. There is  land futher out to the east that is open where the noise won't bounce off the side of a mountain. It may even  have better access than this location. Certainly can hold more people and probably less restrictions on it.  Please  preserve the south end of La Quinta with it's quietness, nature and beauty that we homeowners bought here  My concern is about water usage.   Not just filling the facility but also keeping it a required capacity due to  evaporation in our hot desert climate.  Since we are in a drought situation it just doesn't make sense to be  creating a water park that will use thousands of gallons of the precious commodity.    We moved here to be in a quiet neighborhood.  This will ruin the integrity of the neighborhood, to say nothing  of the environmental damage.  Outrageous idea in this location and drought cycle! I am a winter resident at the Quarry from December to early May. The Quarry, PGA West, and Andalusia are all  residential communities that would be severely and negatively impacted by such a large commercial  development as proposed by the Wave. Water supplies would be threatened, noise regulations violated and  traffic congestion amplified by at least 5‐8 times current levels. The biggest concern I have is with the water consumption.  What an utter waste of the water we have. This  sounds like another vanity/money maker for Surfer Joe.  My other conerns are noise, energy, traffic. UGH!  The  whole project should not be located here in the desert.  i oppose re‐zoning.  i am fine with new developments.........as long as the water shortages are  addressed.........and the planned community meets CURRENT zoning criteria.     Absurd to do something like this when we are in a drought situation! This project would greatly increase traffic  not to mention the light pollution. Thought La Quinta had a "dark sky" policy? This is a very inappropriate use of our water resources.  A water us of this magnitude cannot be justified in a  desert community like La Quinta.  The EIR should be more specific on evaporation and annual water usage.      Secondly the noise pollution of the project within the community is makes rezoning this property inappropriate  How is this a benefit to our community.  The beauty and solitude will never be the same. Nor will our beautiful  birds and animals like our big horn sheep. And the noise and water usage with our drought. No to this wave park.  We are a residential community and most residents moved here for the peace, quiet and tranquility of the area.  Residents travel more than most La Quinta residents for groceries and gas, but enjoy peaceful, beautiful  surroundings not polluted by big light, excessive traffic and noise. This project is an affront to all residents living  here and should be stopped.  Noise travels easily and is captured by the mountains. The noise created will  destroy our quality of life. That doesn’t even begin to address  the concerns I have over the use of water when  we are in the worst drought ever in our State. Devastating water shortage, crime, and this is a residential neighborhood.  In fact with this water shortage there  should not be Any more developments in the Coachella Valley.  Common sense Because of all the things that have been mentioned before.g., noise, lights, traffic, etc. Vehemently opposed to this abomination in our neighbourhood.  Water use during unprecedented times.  Noise  and traffic in a residential area is      Unconscionable.  No! Neighborhood rights for no more noise, traffic, loss of water, right of enjoyment for 55 and over community and  environmental concerns. Water consumption, noise and lights impact the quality of life for EVERYONE in a negative way.   La Quinta The noise and traffic would be terrible, I didn’t invest on a home at the Quarry to be beside something like this.  Would be devastating! I cannot imagine the city changing rezoning laws that they have already approved, and putting a noisy, water  hogging "surf park" right in the middle of a quiet residential area.  It is beyond belief. Also, please look at the  history of these surf parks in TX, Fl. They have not been successful... more likely they will leave an ugly botched  mark on La Quinta than this will be a success. La Quinta City Council: I am against the refining for a Water Park that will be noisy and disruptive to the  peacefulness here in Trilogy… The size, along with the multiple bright lights and waste of water is unacceptable  and unnecessary….I do not believe this development and added traffic and noise will benefit our property  values, quite the opposite, it will lessen the value. Please do not approve this project. I have said from the beginning...wrong place, wrong time. This is a residential area, NOT resort (which is what  this will become with the wave, hotel and allowance of STRs). The claim that this will be private are ludicrous  given the location and the challenges for businesses (and this will be a business) in the heat months. The claim  that there will be no significant impact on the surrounding neighborhoods is ludicrous (traffic, noise). We live  here. We know, not them. Plus I guarantee you this fad will be a hole in the ground within 5‐10 years at best.  Finally, but not less important, how can you approve a project that requires thousands of gallons of water when  we are in a severe drought???  Wrong place, wrong time! Our property will be further impacted by traffic noise from yearly events. In addition the looming drought  remains a threat to our desert area and this waste of water in a desert area is unnecessary. Lastly this is a  retirement community thus this wave park will be noisy. Changing the zoning to accommodate the loss of  water, increased noise and traffic goes against LaQuinta’s goals for an enhanced standard of living. Please  reconsider moving the park to another area that is industrial where homeowners will not be tormented by  additional unnecessary noise, traffic and the misuse of water. Water is for drinking‐ not surfing.  Would add to traffic, congestion, noise, and not ecologically sound.  I can here  for peace and quiet; I like the town as it is.  It is quiet at this end‐ let’s keep it that way. We live at Trilogy La Quinta.  We love our quiet neighborhoods, less traffic and our beautiful mountains.  We  don’t need more noise, traffic, lights at all times of the day.  Water shortage is also a major concern when we  are in a drought situation.  Please, we don’t need a wave park.   1. Water waste first and foremost (during historic drought or any other time)  2.Traffic!   3.Noise pollution   4.Light pollution (what happened to La Quinta's anti‐light pollution policy?)  This is a money hungry project that  cares not one bit for the above issues. It is breathtakingly obvious that it should NOT be approved. Thank you       I moved to this area for the quite and peaceful environment. This project will interfere with the reason most of  us chose this area. Please do not change the zoning. Noise pollution and Light pollution is unacceptable. How can city hall approve this with the water shortage? This project is wrong Please no additional noise and traffic.. Please no additional noise and traffic.. We seriously enjoy peace and quiet, we also love to see stars. We will lose peace & quiet, the sky will be bright,  and traffic will be menacing. Commercial development of this magnitude in the middle of  established residential communities is  unacceptable. People purchased their home far removed from commercial  Development for a reason. The  noise, crowds and light pollution involved with this project from an residential zoned area is unacceptable  We purchased our home purposely knowing that the surrounding area was far away from all the commercial  development and the surrounding areas were zoned as such. To force a commercial development in the middle  of residential communities that involves so noise pollution, crowds, special events, etc is unbelievably unfair to  La Quinta residents in the area. There are already 3 other water parks in development in the Coachella Valley.  What will happen to this property if it fails. It is an incredible waste of 18 million gallons of drinkable water from  our water table in the middle of a historic drought. The whole project just seems like a money crab but the city  council to get a few extra tax dollars with no concern for the loyal  Citizens of the city.  La Quinta,  The wasteful use of water in a desert climate in this time of climate change Too much growth let's not let our valley become another Orange County! I moved out for peace.  I don’t want noise, lights at night or the traffic.  This area should be kept zoned the way it is.  NOBODY wants a noisy, water wasting surf park here Meeds to be in a more adequately zoned commercial area. With access to freeways, etc. Strongly opposed to using our precious water resources to supply this project. Also strongly opposed to the  congestion it would bring and defacing of the natural beauty of Coral Mountain and the Lake Cuhuilla area.   Wrong place, wrong time. La Quinta, I am very concerned about the traffic and noise implications of this development. I live nearby and  belong to The Quarry Golf Club which will be severely impacted. The environmental reprucuiond to our  beautiful mountain is also concerning. It seems there are other places in the Desert that would be more  appropriate for a project of this scale and impact.  Terrible idea. Will ruin the peace and quiet of this beautiful area. This is not the place for this proposed eyesore  Significant traffic and noise I enjoy sitting outside every day.  The noise from this entity will ruin my enjoyment and the traffic will tie up  Madison avenue and make it dangerous to drive on the street.  To allow this entity to be built in the middle of a  residential area makes absolutely no sense!  The area is not conducive to a coney  island atmosphere. The water waste is incredulous. More lipstick on bigger  This project is a waste of our valuable water resourced and it should not be put in the middle of several  residential communities. I live across Madison from this project.  I bought my house knowing the property was zoned for low‐density  residential with a golf course.  I never would have bought next to an amusement park, a hotel, or a site that  would host regular events with hundreds of short‐term renters. This is an affront to me and violates the general  zoning plan for this area.  It must not go forward.  Just took a photo the other day of a big horn sheep crossing 58 if wave park comes where will he go?  Plus  peace and Quiet is why we bought out here and the dark for stars at night and the animals we had a bob cat and  a big horn sheep in our yard last week, so beautiful, please don’t let this be taken away from us Dear council. My reasons for not wanting the wave park next to where I live are much like others. However it’s  just not right. How can anyone justify using this incredible amount of water for a project in the middle or  beginning of the worst drought in California’s history? It’s not being responsible no way no how. I truly can’t  believe this project is even being considered. The zoning isnt even correct. We would have never bought our  retirement home in trilogy had we known this project was even going to be considered. Would any of you want  to live next door to a amusement park that was going to disrupt your peace and serenity in your golden years ?  Would you want your parents to ?  This whole thing is so wrong in so many ways yet here we are. Please say no  to this awful disruptive noise making, traffic making water wasting irresponsible project. No matter how you try  to justify it it’s just plain wrong. Thank you  We moved here  this wonderful location enjoying our retirement years. Not to have a wave park in my  backyard.  Which would bring in more tourists,noise,pollution,traffic etc. Also what happens if there  is a major  earthquake there does all that water go This "Wave" project is out of character with the desert and the existing communities.  The project would add  traffic, water usage, light and noise, and behavior problems. laquinta Wrong time.  Wrong location. I believe responsible development is what is needed in this area. There is too much residential development,  which stands to suffer because this business location. Please do not approve this development and put the  residents before the donations.  U This complex is simply being place in the wrong location.  The area is primarily a residential area mainly  comprised of seniors.  The golf course fits in with the locale. This build is a  mixed use, rental residential  commercial project.  The traffic increase, noise, and transient holidayers will negatively impact the  neighbourhood.  The project simply needs to be relocated to a more commercial neighbourhood.  The water park will have a negative impact on our communities. We are in the middle of a drought and that  should be reason enough for a no on wasting water when people might not have enough to grow crops or drink.      So I am TOTAl AGAINST it.   Rosette Kivel Moved to desert from Los Angeles for peace quiet beautiful stars at night   Less congestion and traffic  I want to keep the peace and quiet of our neighborhood, not live next door to a sports zoo.  Traffic, noise, water consumption EVERYTHING about this project is wrong for this location. Too many serious issues to numerate! This is an unwarranted and unwanted project that should be dismissed.  The city council needs to pay attention  to the residents this would impact. Construction for years, noise, no traffic plans, pollution, loss of natural habitat for sheep, light pollution at night.  Sever and undesirable impact on the surrounding communities, ecosystems of the desert and water  consumption. It will also impact the Big Horn Sheep's natural habitat. Sever and undesirable impact on the surrounding communities, ecosystems of the desert and water  consumption. It will also impact the Big Horn Sheep's natural habitat. Water is a huge issue.  This is the wrong usage of water especially during the worst drought the Western United  States has seen in years. We are in a drought and this project would be very irresponsible. We need conservation not a wave park.  I moved here for a quiet residential life style.  I moved here because there was a lack of high traffic venues in  this area.  This project is not good use of water. Water, noise, will ruin the quiet ambiance we all moved out here for I am mostly concerned about the amount of "drinking water" required.  Plus I'm sure the noise will bother  neighbors.  This is no time to waste water! It’s just all wrong, everything about it! The  Primarily, the effect it will have on traffic, congestion, and noise in the area I live in, off Madison, at PGA West.   Secondarily, but equally as important, is my concern about the large buildout, and the climate/water issues we  are experiencing and will continue to experience moving forward.  Now is NOT THE RIGHT TIME for this project!  My main concern is the potable water usage.  We are in the beginning of a many year drought and we just do  not have the water. The area is already congested enough with the festivals. Put it somewhere that can support the high traffic load  and accommodations, and not right in our neighborhoods. I left Los Angeles in 2012 for PGA West in La Quinta due to the serenity and ability to “star and planet” watch  through my backyard telescope.  I so enjoy the lack of crowds and noise and am very concerned about the  commotion & traffic this project will bring.  Unnecessary excessive water use during extensive long term drought is our primary complaint. Traffic, noise,  lights and short term rentals are big concerns as well.  Too much impact  Wrong project for this site  Many reasons.  Not zoned as commercial.  This is a residential zoned area and should remain such.  No reason it  can't be moved east to a more suitable location that will not impact our beautiful area.  I'm a no on this project  because of the impact of noise, traffic, lights, and usage of scarce water.  Can't believe that our planners would  think this is a fit for our residential community. This is not good. I’m all for economic development but not at the cost of our natural resources. My family and I  recently moved to La Quinta and we love it! If we wanted a lot more development + waves we would have  purchased in the Marina in LA. We are in love with the slower pace of life and the community like environment.  I would love to see more development Catered to young families. I don’t see how this buildout benefits the  young ones who live here specially since the next generation is extremely Eco‐conscious. This also brings up the  question for me of how we build out La Quinta without negative affects to our natural resources? Recently relocated to La Quinta from Orange County. Part of our reasoning for relocating had to due with  excessive traffic and overcrowding. Adding a resort like this amongst residential communities will bring added  congestion to our community. Dear Council Members,     I have been a LQ resident for over 25 years.  IMO, the proposed Coral Mountain  Resort with its massive wave feature and disruptive presence (lighting, overall use, traffic impacts, etc). is not  appropriate for this community.  Not to mention the grossly abusive water use, in fact, the mere appearance of  that issue alone should be off‐putting and give Counsel pause.   Please, listen to us, your continuants and from  the LQRRD ‐ acquiesce to our demands.   There are many other ways to fill the LQ City coffers besides this  development.    Thank you for reading and for your consideration of my opinion.    Sincerely,    Jacque Stewart Dear Council Members,     I am a LQ resident for over 15 years.  My letter is based upon over 20 years of my  successful real estate development experience in the Temecula Valley ‐ an area very similar to the economic  and social environment found in La Quinta.      The proposed Coral Mountain Resort with its massive wave  feature and disruptive presence (lighting, overall use, traffic impacts, etc). Not to mention the grossly abusive  water use, in fact, the mere appearance of that issue alone should be off‐putting and give Counsel pause.       Considering all those factors, in my professional opinion,  this proposed development is not in the best interest  of the La Quinta community ‐ it is "irresponsible development" personified.  Please, listen to your continuants  from the LQRRD and acquiesce to their demands.   There are many other ways to fill the LQ City coffers besides  this development.    Thank you for reading and for your consideration of my opinion.    Sincerely yours,    Richard  One of the most beautiful aspects of LaQuinta (and desert) living is to be able to look up toward the sky at night  and see the stars. This is because of very little ambient light from commercial and recreational developments.  This proposed circus environment will obliterate that for miles around the proposed project—ruining the  environment for the benefit of a few who want to water surf in the desert. Even saying it out loud makes one  shake their head in wonderment as to how anyone could think this was a good idea.  At least cut the hours of  Do not rezone to commercial use in a purely residential area all ready zoned  light residential.  No other  commercial development in the area for miles around.  Sound generated will probably reflect off of the Coral  Mountains and adjacent wilderness area.  There are potentially better areas available nearer I 10 which would  give better access to this type of venue to vehicular traffic as opposed to using residential streets to gain access  to the venue .  Definitely the wrong place for this and the amount of water use is probably going to be more  than expected.   I am definitely opposed  to this type of development here.   It will diminish the beauty of the area through noise and light pollution. We will be directly affected by this development.  We have donated to the Go Fund Me and thank Ramon for his  efforts   This project would Permanently change the peaceful neighborhood here at Trilogy. My wife and I moved to  Trilogy at La Quinta 6 years ago after looking at other over 55 communities here in the valley. We chose to live  here because of location. Please don't take the peaceful, quite, ease of driving for shopping & eating at  restaurants with little traffic away. We are in our mid 80's and the thought of moving again is very stressful. We  love it here just as it is. With all the noise and increased traffic this project would bring reminds of as to why we  left the SF Bay Area to live in La Quinta.    My concerns are water conservation and noise. Please don't change the zoning to allow this wave park. Worried about noise . Our environment is quiet now. Also water park during drought conditions seems  inappropriate I live very close to the site. I’m extremely concerned about the additional traffic sound and light pollution. The traffic on Madison Avenue cannot be mitigated. It is the only artery of traffic coming to the development.   With a 150 room hotel and hundreds of condos on the vacation rental schedule it is unsurmountable.  Technical  reports defending draft EIRS have always mitigated traffic. Your next door neighbors in Corona CA all had traffic  mitigation measures and now we have a 12 lane freeway which is bumper to bumper traffic and all the traffic  mitigation reports in the 1980's were simply wrong.  The entire I‐15 corridor also had traffic mitigation for the  full mitigation for the full I‐15 corridor and it is also a nightmare.  All of the experts, traffic engineers, who stated  equivocally that traffic could be mitigated, were false and now it is coming to our town.  Follow the money! It will forever change the complexity of La Quinta and the surrounding area in a negative way. Traffic and noise level This is an immoral development that is a waste of water that is needed for life.  It will destroy the solitude of our community.  Traffic issues and noise and light pollution will be a detriment to  our environment.  The people that this facility will attract add nothing to the City of La Quinta and will detract  from it's reputation.  The water conservation issue alone is more than enough to reject the proposal and not  rezone our neighborhood.  We need Grocery Stores and shopping  in La Quinta not a Wave Park.  As a person  who was a surfer in my youth, trust me, you don't want them here in or near a retirement community.  Ask  Traffic, noise, too much light at night, need to conserve water, concerned about commercial designation, etc.,  etc., etc. We settled  in La Quinta for peace and quiet in our golden years.  Please don't take these away! There is a mega‐drought in all western states, it is irresponsible to use millions of gallons of water for such an  unimportant facility.  It’s irresponsible to consider this project in the midst of a mega‐drought  that could possibly go on for years.   I am so concerned about many aspects of this project. First, it seems crazy that there are 5 new wave projects  planned for the Coachella Valley when there were none before, and all except one are planned to be private,  and incredibly expensive if one wants to surf there.     The issue of our drought is foremost, though. How on  earth anyone can even consider approving this project which will use fresh, potable water at this time of severe  and devastating drought is beyond insane.  I beg the city to be responsible and deny approval. This project is totally irresponsible in light of the on going record breaking drought due to climate change.  How  can you let this developer use our precious drinking water at a time when we are not even sure how the water  will be replenished.  Additionally homeowners purchased their homes in the adjoining communities with the  understanding Coral Mountain would be developed with single family homes and a golf course corresponding to  the neighboring communities.  Most of us purchased for the quiet upscale lifestyle this area afford.  Most of us  would not have purchased here if we had known a extreme sport amusement park would be going in at Coral  Mountain.  A project that no way corresponds to the surrounding developments.  Please do the right thing and  decline this out of step project.  Putting it in would be the biggest negative on the Gem of the Desert outside of  Noise, traffic and unnecessary water usage during a drought goes against everything we moved here to enjoy.  I strongly am opposed the wave park project. My bedroom window will stare directly in line with the proposed  80’ lights. Keeping me up every night 365 till 10pm or longer. Who the heck surfs at night anyways?    Say no to  short term rentals, so no to parties, say no to 3 stray buildings against the Coral Mountain. Just say no.  Noise, usage of water, traffic, lack of concern for neighboring communities.  I am completely against rezoning.  That is not why I moved the La Quinta. I want it to stay the same. Ridiculous to even consider given the drought ‐ immediate and future outlook.  Basically, no reason to move  foward with this other than potential revenue for La Quinta which, I believe, will NOT be anywhere near where  forecasted by the promoters. Drought, noise, lights ruining the night sky, traffic, being restricted from hiking Coral Mountain, not the right  place or time for this project. There is plenty of land nearer highway 10 or further away from already developed property to develop  something so loud. The roads would NOT be able to handle the additional traffic and the lights and sounds  would be a major nuisance.   I don't believe this area of La Quinta is suitable for the proposed plan.  I feel strongly that it will "cheapen" the  surrounding communities.   If Arnie were still living here in La Quinta I think he would feel the same way.   There  are so many other wonderful activities and events that would continue to enhance our city.  I hope the City of  La Quinta will always keep this in mind.   Thank you. La Quinta La Quinta If the City is looking to increase tax revenue, then let the developers find more suitable properties in areas such  a the 111 corridor  The reason I chose to live here was to get away from the traffic and noise and to enjoy the surrounding beauty.   My concerns are related to the environment and the destruction this wave park will cause.  Water and  electricity are major concerns.  Conservation of both are of the utmost importance, making this proposal a  This development does not belong in a residential area.  It also makes no sense when current residents are  already being asked to conserve water because of drought and to conserve electricity to avoid power outages.  This development makes no sense in our current situation and sets a horrible example. Drought issues   Traffic issues   Noise issues  Etc I moved here because of the lack of traffic and the tranquility of the area.  If I wanted to move into an area  considered commercial property I wouldn’t have moved it.  This will ruin the quality of life here.  It is bad  enough that we have to deal with rowdy short term vacation renters and their noise and traffic! It's absolutely irresponsible on the part of the city to even think about considering the zoning change to an  amusement type resort amongst single family homes AND especially for the water usage in a hot desert where  we are under drought conditions most of the time. They should put it down near the Salton Sea in an area of no  homes and let them pump water out of the Salton Sea. This project is entirely out of synch with this area of La Quinta.  Our quiet low key community will be inundated  with traffic, noise and a fairground type environment which is totally out of character with the residential  environment we have here in Trilogy and and the other communities in this southern area of La Quinta. Where  are the concerns about water management when we are experiencing record temperatures and increasingly  severe drought conditions.  This project is completely out of character with both the needs of our community  and the negative impact on the environment including extreme water wastage.  If you want to surf go to the  ocean ‐ it’s not that far away!    Thank you ‐ let common sense and concern for the environment guide your  decision making.    Jim Newman The last thing we need is a wave park in the desert with the climate  heating up and drying up.   For all the afore‐mentioned reasons we are opposed but particularly for the unsustainable environmental  foolishness of this project is incomprehensible and truly short‐sighted.  NO, NO, NO.  Please do not move  forward on this project.   The negative impact on the environment. Seismic issues, noise  and traffic congestion    I moved to Andalusia   four peace and quiet. The water park project will destroy this beautiful community. People come to palm springs for a relaxing, upscale getaway. Adding a Mickey Mouse waterpark across the  street from high‐end resorts is not the right decision.  I adamantly oppose the rezoning of this parcel.  It does not belong in a residential neighorhood. After 30 years living within 1000 feet of the ocean in Manhattan Beach I got tired of the crowds and constant  crowd in the neighborhood.  I thought my new home in PGA West was the tranquility solution I was looking  for…. I don’t even have to deal with the line‐up on PGA Blvd as we enter from Madison .   Needless to say, it’s  quite distressing to think my City Council will allow this intrusion to me, and all of the other retirees in the  Noise, traffic, environmental impact, water shortage.  We just bought into the community last year and made a trade off to be further out to enjoy the quiet.  This  proposed development will cheapen the area, cause noise, add traffic and alter the environment of our  There is no benefit to this community, no benefit for the environment...just benefits selfish developers and ego  driven council members. Please do not call me. I agree with all the reasons why it's not right for us.  Because the neighborhood needs to be peaceful for what it costs It will bring in more traffic and it will put a tighter restraint on the resources. La quinta is a unique, high end,  space that will be downgraded should a park of this nature be placed there.  For all of the above or attached info ‘say no to Coral Mountain Resort’ Climate change is in process which will mean hotter, drier seasons for the Coachella Valley. Potable water for  drinking and agriculture is already a concern. Building a 16.7 acre pool filled from the aquifer is irresponsible! Do  not rezone this property.   It is unconscionable to facilitate building projects that consume massive amounts of water and power.  This  development is obnoxious and obtrusive and has no place in the pristine desert landscape.  We would do well to  preserve our natural resources and limit our footprint.  ‐   Even any golf course that might end up approved  should be a xeriscape golf course ‐ saving water of such magnitude that it is nationally recognized for its forward  thinking sustainability.   La Quinta I do not support this project.  It is not compatible with the current developments in the area.  The Park and  Resort should be located away from residential properties. No rezoning, no more noise, no high density…. No destruction of the beautiful desert in this area. Not the right  place for this type of facility. Please!!!!! La Quinta I have lived on Ave 60, (right next door to the project) for 30 years.  I am very concerned about the water usage,  noice (bouncing off of the mountain) and  noice from the park, lights, traffic on both Ave 60 and Madison,  vibrations from the motion of the wave causing cracks in my home and pool. None of which they will guarantee  will not effect my home or property.  I have other concerns about blowing dirt, construction traffic and noise  during the development.  I was told by an employee of the development  to "go stay in San Diego" so these  things would not effect me.  Not an appropriate answer.... This project is totally inappropriate for La Quinta. The noise, congestion, STR’s which are not permitted in our  City, but most important is protecting our water source.  Our aquifer is not being replenished as expected and  with the drought everywhere in the Western US, it is unlikely it will be.  This use of our precious natural  resource for a water park is unconscionable.  This is California with miles of coastline for surfing.  The developers  seem to think this will be popular in the summer. I disagree.  Why am I and many of my neighbors and friends  who live in the desert in the winter months now gone for cooler climates?  I have been saving newspaper  articles on the drought which I intend to send to the council members, just in case they are only looking for tax  revenues. I could go on and on but I believe this website covers it thoroughly. NO WAVE PARK IN LA QUINTA  La Quinta is no place for a water park. It will ruin the natural beauty of the territory. It will add significantly  congestion and noise to a peaceful residential area. The zoning should remain solely as originally designed.  We bought our home in Trilogy, right next to this proposed development, because of the tranquil beauty and  quiet that exists here. The specter of this gigantic disruptive development is very distressing! This project will become a cancer that will spread and finally kill the sense that the surrounding community is  residential and not commercial. I purchased my home in a residentially zoned area to have the benefits of a quiet, low volume traffic,  commercial free neighborhood. This project runs counter to all these qualities and is not the right entity and not  the right time.  Thanks  We love the peace and quiet of our neighborhood.  Don’t need additional noise and traffic.   This project makes no sense.  It will deplete our already short supply; create too much noise and more  importantly, the amount of traffic will make it nearly impossible to drive on Madison Avenue and other near by  streets.  STOP IT NOW! against commercial zoning with transient behavior  Traffic, noise, misuse of water, loud music to drown out machines all day & into night….put it near freeway &  away from communities if you must have it!!! I’m concerned about the environmental impact, waste of water, noise and traffic issues that will negatively  impact my community.  I purchased my home in Andalusia CC because it is quite and serene.  I prefer it stays that way.   Honestly, this plan defies all logic.  We are the desert with a delicate ecosystem.  The water usage, the noise,  the traffic, the construction, the ego of surfer joe....please no.  This will forever change our beautiful area. Water  here is a gift and should not be used in such a reckless manner. Almost worse than building this park is getting it  half constructed and for some unforeseen reason ...it is pulled.  IMPERATIVE: neutral EIR.  The LaQuinta Wave Park and STR development, the other Wave Parks planned for the Valley, and the Rancho  Mirage residential development with 34‐acre lagoon, are all absurd  wastes of our aquifer resource The state is in another drought, and water restrictions are in our future. How then can this developer be allowed  to keep pulling water out of the aquifer. It's unconscionable to approve the zoning change for this project. Noise, lights, traffic congestion and all the water conservation challenges in the future so close to my home in  Trilogy!!😩 Everything about this proposed resort makes no sense....Environmentally and just plain common sense...it  doesn't belong here in La Quinta... I agree this project does not belong in this area.  Big money should not be allowed to buy or change peoples  Keep the current zone at Residential.  The wavepark should not be allowed to locate in a residential community.    Put it with other commercial developments.  Misuse of our previous water resources, disruption and damage to desert ecosystem, negative impact on  community quality of life ‐ noise, traffic congestion, security. For the third time I own a place in La Quinta primarily because of the zoning separation of residential housing  and commercial development. To put this gigantic commercial development on top of residents is outrageous.  Any La Quinta elected official that is for this project should be voted out of office. We moved here because La Quinta was a trusted city where we could depend on their planning integrity, and  integrity if the Mayor and Council.  This integrity included a hi end residential golf community ‐ promising a quiet  area to retire and helping others. The city should not break that promise by allowing a rezoning to tourist  etc..Breaking that promise would negatively affect the peaceful retirement promised, but also the future value  of the city’s integrity and home values.  Noise, traffic, lighting, loss of night sky views, bats and bighorn sheep loss of habitat, not just after the fact but  ALL DURING CONSTRUCTION.  Dust, truck pollution, water use.  quality of life  This is the wrong project for La Quinta.  It is a beautiful piece of land in a peaceful setting.  The wave park will  create excessive noise and congestion in a residential community. With two other wave parks planned for the  desert in more commercial settings, this one is simply not needed and should be rejected.    This will create excess noise and traffic congestion in a residential area.  The proposed wave park is not  reflective of the surrounding residential communities.  There are any number of reasons to deny rezoning.  Top among these has to be traffic.  Lack of traffic and the  commensurate tranquility is the number one reason we and our neighbors chose to buy and live in South La  Quinta.  Trilogy at La Quinta is made up of 1238 single family dwellings.  Assuming two persons for each  dwelling, it can be quickly calculated that the four events per year would be like dumping the entire population  of Trilogy on our streets all at once.  In addition to the event attendees, we must add in those individuals staying  in the STVR's (600), the hotel (150 rooms), and the 400 individual proposed homes.  The proposed resort does  not fit into South La Quinta in any way, shape or form.  The proposed rezoning must be denied. I don’t think the Coral Mountain Resort will be good for the quiet community off La Quinta. The Wave project goes against La Quinta Land Planning Use Goal #LU‐1"Land Use compatibility maintain  landscape map and zoning map.  #LU‐2 .4 potential impacts (not addressed fully  in the EIR.)# LU‐3.1a  preservation of neighborhood characteristics and "sense of place". #3.1b compatible with existing  neighborhood. This project belongs in an existing Commercial/Tourist locale.  The developer's requested re‐zoning is completely outside the intended use for the subject parcels, per the La  Quinta master development plan.  Permitting the zoning change will forever change the intended nature of  surrounding land parcels, both developed and planned. Palm Desert Excession noise and traffic.  Too close to residential property and would devalue the property.  I have  experienced other  similar instances and it does not work close to a residential development. I bought my home in the Andalusia Country Club because it is quiet and serene, and I want it to stay that way. Do not want our peaceful quiet area ruined by commercialism! As a frequent visitor to the Valley, it is difficult to understand why a development of this magnitude would be  approved or even considered. All over CA there is a drought. Orchards of fruit and almond trees are being ripped  out over lack of water. Salmon are dying. Disrupting our food supply. Yet this mega water hungry intrusive  unnecessary project development is proposed and considered for approval. This is a truly representative  of a  developer’s greed trying to prevail over protecting the environment and health for the close proximity  residents. Just any one of the increase in traffic noise, dust, pollution and driving safety issues should be enough  to turn down this project proposal. The Valley will lose many of it’s long term residents that support the local  businesses. This is a destination resort that will only benefit the developer not the community. I kindly request  that this whole development permit be denied. Save our Valley and our fragile environment.  I am a member of Andalusia Golf Club.  In short, building the Coral Mountain Surf Resort at this location will  disrupt the serenity of this golf community.   Incompatible with neighborhood, lifestyle and available Coachella Valley water resources/drought conditions. Too much traffic, noise, and light. My thoughts, very similar to those of many members of the LQRRD, are explained in a letter by P. Novak  (myself) and B. Novak to the Desert Sun newspaper shortly after it published S. Barkas' article (late June, 2021)  on the public availability of a recent Environmental Impact Report.  Our letter has been forwarded to the La  Quinta City Council.   P.N.  Submitted opposition letter to Nicole Sauviat Criste and  to the Managing Editor of the Desert Sun. 1. Maintain dark skies  2. Conserve water use  3. Avoid sound pollution (reverberating off mountains)  4. Halt  increase in STVRs (LQ city does a lousy job as it is with monitoring the existing permitted addresses)  5. Keep  residential areas for the current people who live there and for future residents Basically, it is an obnoxious intrusion into the area. The wave park should be in an industrial zoned area near a  freeway.  I hope serious consideration is given to our concerns which have been well documented in the comments above  with which I fully agree. We purchased our home with the knowledge that this area is zoned Low Density Residential, expecting only  residential development.   It's unfair to thousands of property owners to change this, forcing us to sell our  homes and move!  We were here first.  Please deny rezoning  as this operation is a completely inappropriate use of water in the delicate desert  ecosystem .   Our earth is 2/3rds covered in ocean ‐ surfing is an ocean sport ‐ why would we destroy the desert  This rezoning proposal is wrong in so many ways.  The wanton waste of water, our most precious resource in  the desert, the light pollution from 80 foot light towers, the constant pounding of waves on the fragile geology  of the area and the noise pollution on many local communities, just to mention a few. This  is  a  non‐ conforming  use  that does  not  deserve  consideration  by The  city of  la  Quinta.  I fear  that the    city council is  blinded  by  the  prospect  of  bed tax  revenue.  This  project will not  bail out  our  city from  past    financial mistakes. La Quinta.I am opposed to the project for all the reasons expressed in this petition. Noise, water use,  incompatibility with the surrounding residential neighborhoods and the uncertainty of the time line for the build  out. This project does not bring anything positive tot he residents of La Quinta and mars the beauty of Coral  Mountain. Completely inappropriate use of land and water in the desert, and a great way to ruin la quinta  The CVWD's positive input to the City of La Quinta environmental impact study is based partially on imposing  excessive future rate increases for water on all La Quinta residents, thereby forcing them to participate  indirectly to the funding for the senseless project. That is illegal! It would just totally ruin a beautiful part of our La Quinta area, and is not what we need out this way!  Say NO to  this terrible project.....please for our future. La Quinta  This property will negatively  impact the environment especially in a drought.  Loud, crowded, water consumption required to operate Responsible planning and development in an area zoned for low density residential should NOT allow for  rezoning for commercial water park! We purchased our home in Andalusia because of the tranquility of the immediate area we wanted to be away  from traffic, commercial congestion and noise.  We chose to drive 10 minutes further out to avoid this.  We are  adamantly opposed to this project due to the change in zoning from low density golf course community to a  commercial development.  It will change our area to the opposite of why we chose to live there. Could you have picked a quieter corner of the desert to put this development/amusement park? I have many  concerns starting w/ the zone change. How can people trust that their city won't pull the rug out from under  their feet in doing a change like this?  People make huge investments to buy a home in a quiet neighborhood  and the city unilaterally changes the zoning?  And of all things a Surf Park?!  using our precious drinking water, in  a serious drought, with light poles 80 feet high so people can surf at night!  Where in the world does anyone surf  at night?  I would bet that every house with a view of Coral Mtn. will see those lights day AND night!  What  happened to dark skies?  What about the bats who live around this area?  The biologists who studied the bat  population in this area said night lights would cause problems for the bats‐a protected species.  The noise of the  surf pool open from 7am to 10 pm everyday of the year, not to mention the calling of the wave every 3 or 5  minutes?  People cheering or hooting and hollering, and loud music.  Watch a video from the surf pool in  Lemoore, CA if you want to get an idea of that. The Environmental report said the Mountains would absorb the  sound.  On what planet does stone absorb sound?  The noise will ricochet around the mountains.  The  Environmental report also said there would be little increase in traffic and only a stop sign would be needed at  58th and Madison.  Can you imagine 2500 people coming to an event w/o a stop light on that intersection!   Traffic would be backed up to the Polo grounds!  And what about the "resort" itself.  A hotel 4 stories tall‐tell  me where a 4 story building is in all of La Quinta and this one will block the view of SO many homes  in nearby  developments.  Then there's the cabanas, a fancy name for Short Term Vacation Rentals!  La Quinta has paused  STVR license approval yet in this location that's all there will be!  The sub phase development will create more  noise and chaos for years to come.  And I'm not sure who wants to buy a multi million dollar home located next  to an amusement park.  Will those homes ever be built?  Please, please stop this before it starts.  It is wrong for  Commercial development within an established residential community is illogical and goes against the LA Quinta  2035 Plan. This Project, if rezoning is allowed to take place, does not fit. This is "not about MY backyard" ‐ it should not be  in anyone's back yard except where zoning currently allows for.  The 2035 La Quinta General Plan was adopted  for a reason ‐ PLEASE KEEP THE ZONING AS IS.  Additionally, please do not allow for Projects that take our  drinking water from our aquifer.  A responsible Developer can CHOOSE to put in a "drought conscious" golf  course ‐ or  can choose  less water intensive features for the development.  Times have changed. The additional traffic deterioration of our night sky the noise is not appropriate for a residential community. We bought our home w the understanding that the property by Coral Mountain was zoned for residential not  for a commercial water park. The lights will obscure our dark sky evenings. The wave announcements will  destroy our quiet environment. The water usage is a disgrace for a state that suffers from drought. The city  members of La Quinta cannot be this stupid/careless  or greedy, Big money must be influencing this process.  The City council has a stewardship to protect the natural beauty of Coral Mountain, and to maintain the  integrity of what’s right for La Quinta. Noise, Traffic, Lights, Events  For the myriad of reasons that the organization of LA QUINTA RESIDENTS FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT of  which I agree as laid out we are adamantly opposed to the proposed Wave project. We bought our home in this  La Quinta development for the tranquility and the Wave project is directly in front of our home. This project was  never disclosed to us at the time of sale. So irresponsible to consider a project of this scope when Climate concerns are real and water in California is on  a path extreme drought conditions indefinitely  ‐ WHY, WHY this alone shows irresponsible judgement never  mind the other concerns regarding traffic, noise, lighting etc.... Please do not be on the wrong‐side of La  Quinta's master plan.  Please please do not turn a long term peaceful residential environment into a commercial short term stay  entertainment center We bought in this area as it is residential and was always zoned for that.  Putting a commercial Wave Park or  amusement park in our area is ridiculous! A city creates a master plan which establishes zoning regulations to control future development.  People depend  on those zoning regulations when investment decisions are made.  A change from residential zoning to  commercial/resort zoning after years of residential development would be a catastrophe for the people who  have invested in the residential zone.   This is the wrong project for this area on all fronts. Would completely take away from what La Qunita is, has  been and should be in the future.  The entire project is terrible and the wrong project for our beautiful city! I have already written to the city council to voice my concerns about changing the community from a high end,  serene residential area to a carnival. If I would have known this, I wouldn’t have bought in La Quinta. I believe  this will impact future buyers that desire a peaceful, luxurious community.   No, for all the reason cited above. This is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong time. I am concerned about the excessive water usage and the amount of development and traffic it will bring to the  area.  LA Quinta is NOT the place for this. Stop this change in zoning, stop this water park circus and do not allow any night time activists on this site, no  Short Term Rentals, no parties, no concerts etc.   We do not want Coral Mountain near our homes in La Quinta! Noise, traffic general degrading of our community. Totally irresponsible,  The zoning should stay the same.  To change after the others are already there is not something equitable.   There is surely other areas for something like this to be put into. This project is totally out of step with everything that is going wrong with our environment in the State of  California. We don't need or want this type of development here in La Quinta. I am definitely against this project  .                      This project is totally out of step with everything that is going wrong with our enviroment in the  State of California     The development will forever change the tranquility of this área. The impacts will be much too severe. This is a terrible idea!  please show some consideration for the homeowners in LaQuinta!  We bought in this area because of the quiet and peaceful surroundings as well as the natural beauty.  This new  development will negatively impact the reasons we bought here.  The size of the proposed development is too  large for this area.  The number of units they are proposing, the hotel and the size of the wave pool will  dramatically increase traffic.  The structures they are proposing will absolutely impact the natural beauty of the  area.  The wave pool and the entertainment that comes with will certainly impact the quite nature of the area.   This land has it current zoning for a reason—to maintain the quiet and natural setting of the surrounding area.   Please do not allow the rezoning happen.  This is an area of La Quinta that should be kept from any further large  development so it keeps natural charm and surroundings. Because there are so many other sites that ARE ZONED for this project, move it there! We don’t want the  disruption, or traffic, noise, lights, people, visitors, potential crime…take this project to the area zoned for it.  Across the 10. It’s that easy.  Traffic will shut down on Madison Ave. It will deplete our water resources which have previously been  protected. It will interfere with our use and enjoyment to our home due to light and noise pollution.  It will  create party central at this venue which is not what La Quinta wants.  It is unfortunate that I feel (as do many other LQ residents I've conversed with) that the City Council has already  made up its mind regarding this project.      It seems as though the City Council is considering the potential  financial impact without factoring in the negative environmental aspects (projected water use being an amazing  waste, in spite of what the very brief draft EIR states) and overwhelming annoyance on the part of the residents.    We, the residents, DO NOT WANT this type of commercial and recreational development on City land zoned for  residential.  I am also concerned about the noise generated by Wave Announcements.  Is the City aware that  Coral Mountain already bounces and echos sound from people walking nearby?  I did not buy my home in 2007  to have a WATER PARK across the street.    Frankly, it is a total mystery as to why the City Council has not killed  this project already.  I highly suspect this wave park, if approved, will become an abandoned eyesore 15‐20  years out as the developer's and users' enthusiasm fades and water becomes a scarce resource.   We paid a premium to have a quiet and tranquil environment in the house we purchased.  We understood that  future development projects would be done in alignment with the rules and approaches that have served La  Quinta well over the past 50+ years.  The wave pool is not in line with the current tenor of La Quinta and we ask  that you do not allow such a different and short term place to be built here. It is unfortunate that I feel (as do many other LQ residents I've conversed with) that the City Council has already  made up its mind regarding this project.      It seems as though the City Council is considering the potential  financial impact without factoring in the negative environmental aspects (projected water use being an amazing  waste, in spite of what the very brief draft EIR states) and overwhelming annoyance on the part of the residents.    We, the residents, DO NOT WANT this type of commercial and recreational development on City land zoned for  residential.  I am very concerned about the light pollution caused by the light towers destroying the evening /  night ambiance.  I am also concerned about the noise generated by Wave Announcements.  Is the City aware  that Coral Mountain already bounces and echos sound from people walking nearby?  I did not buy my home in  2007 to have a WATER PARK across the street.    Frankly, it is a total mystery as to why the City Council has not  killed this project already.  I think that one only needs to "follow the money".   I highly suspect this wave park, if  approved, will become an abandoned eyesore 15‐20 years out as the developer's and users' enthusiasm fades  and water becomes a scarce resource.   It's absolutely preposterous and beyond irresponsible to allow an amusement‐style wave park in this beautiful,  quiet and tranquil part of the desert (or in any CA desert for that matter) during an unprecedented drought and  increasingly record‐breaking hot temps that are only getting worse each year. The fact that the city of LQ and  developers are somehow able and willing to circumvent or change zoning laws demonstrates such a selfish  money grab and complete indifference to the protection and preservation of local aquifers, natural desert  habitat and dark night skies that it is beyond my comprehension.  The purpose of moving to La Quinta was for peace and quiet and the beauty of the area   It why we left LA   We  are in our 70’s and I have severe health issues.   The peaceful environment is why we purchased our new home  in la Quinta  We built our retirement home in Andalusia because of the serenity of the Coral mountains in an area zoned for  residential homes and golf courses and away from all commercial activities.  This is like dropping Disneyland in a  residential area.  Please don’t ruin it for thousands of like minded people. This project is inconsistent with the surrounding communities.  We are not opposed to development of this  parcel what I am opposed to is having a “amusement park” when I and my neighbors purchase our homes with  the understanding that  the development would consist of single family homes and a golf course.  This project  would bring a permanent disruption to our lovely area.  I bought in this lovely area to get away from the noise,  pollution and traffic of Los Angeles.  This irresponsible project would create all these problems and in addition  rob us of our precious drinking water in the middle of a record breaking drought.  How irresponsible is this.  La  Quinta has a responsibility to preserve our drinking water not hand it over to an out of touch developer to  create another white elephant in the desert. Its all about money money money and to allow this project to go through would be for all the wrong reasons.  Our community is a peaceful place that most of us have worked our entire lives with this type of living as our  goal. This money maker would change the entire atmosphere of what LaQuinta is all about. The Gem if the  Desert will no longer be a Gem by letting this happen. Rethink‐Rethink‐Rethink   I am a new homeowner in Andalusia Country Club. I explored several home purchase options in La Quinta and  the peace and tranquility of Andalusia and its surroundings were a major driving force in my purchase decision. I  think it would be a travesy to allow a wave park and resort facility in the land across from Andalusia. It would  absolutely turn our existence upside down.  This is a major NO, NO, NO..  Bright Lights, lots of traffic, lots of noise, already have water shortage....Bad, Bad idea NO, NO, NO!!!!!!! I support responsible people who stand up with facts against an irresponsible project!  Fritz Bachli, Prof. of  Economics and Environmental Science Please see my letter submitted to the City of La Quinta.  No Wave project. All the above ‐ this rezoning is illegal ‐ the city has no right to approve this No on Noise Pollution, Water Usage (during drought), Stadium Lighting, Traffic Increase! Trilogy Residents will  suffer! Our peaceful retirement community will be destroyed! Property needs to stay residential.  No rezoning for a Wavepark as it will not be a good fit for that property as  demonstrated by multiple issues. The reason I am opposed to this development is that it does not belong in an area of La Quinta that is zoned  Residential. There are many more issues involved with this development that I have voiced to the consulting Co  reviewing the project as well as the Mayor and City Council members for the city of la Quinta.  I have been fighting this from the beginning and agree with all of your points. We don't need this ! This area is residential and needs to remain residental to preserve the calm and quiet homeowners sought when  they moved here.. The irresponsible use of water in a drought plagued environment is ridiculous and terribly  short sighted. This Valley is an artificial oasis, dependent on an ancient aquifer accumulated over thousands of years. Now, the  CVWA is allowing the squandering of that potable water for projects like this.  The aquifer is not being  replenished‐‐impossible just considering the 120+ little‐used golf courses wasting millions of gallons a day.  Flow  from the Colorado River will continue to diminish‐‐affecting all the agriculture in the Valley.  The 34 acre  "lagoon" being constructed in the development on former Annenberg land in Rancho Mirage is another example  of absurd water waste.  This Valley will eventually have a water problem without a solution. Rezoning this property is the WRONG decision. My future votes will be predicated on the actions of the city  council on this issue. Say NO! Not good for the environment or our quiet section of our city With all the available commercial space along CA‐111 it is outrageous and totally unacceptable to invade the  residential neighborhoods.  The growth of La Quinta has widely separated residential from commercial, why  upset that plan.   Not to mention conservation or the environment.   For all reasons mentioned  in your website. Noise, congestion and short term rentals so close to our community  year round.  La Quinta: We live in a desert!!!!!!! My primary concern is the irresponsible exploitation of our precious water resources. Secondly, this area is  zoned residential, not commercial. Most of us live in retirement communities because we relish the peace and  quiet of our desert. If I wanted to live next door to Disneyland, I'd have moved to Anaheim.  I cannot imagine the city of La Quinta approving this project during a time of such severe and terrifying drought.  It is basically stealing precious drinking water from the whole west coast.   The zoning of this project will have to  be changed, too. The property is zoned for homes, not for commercial use.  It will decimate peace and quiet for  surrounding residents with its noise, traffic, and light pollution. It will destroy neighboring property values.  In  sum, I cannot imagine approving this development and still being able to sleep at night.   Absolutely the wrong type of development for this area. Water wasting, light pollution, and noise pollution and  Resort type mentality to ruin a very peaceful setting that we have enjoyed and cherished since we purchased 8  years ago. This area needs development but only one that will conform to what is already in this area now.    After listening to a recent presentation by the Developers regarding their plans for this proposed development, I  cannot think of a more irresponsible use of such a precious resource of WATER! This type of development and  irresponsible use of such a scare and critical  commodity  should not only be banned from the Coachella Valley,  it should be banned from the entire state of California as well as All of the Western states where water is in a  critical shortage of supply.  In addition I learned from the developers presentation:  1. the hours of operation  will be 7a.m. to 10p.m. 365 days per year, not 7a.m. to 5p.m. as advertised  2.Major events attracting thousands  to a residential area is a prime focus and will not be just a few times a year event  3. The wave feature is only  the first of a multitude of sporting events and activities that will be developed and offered in the future.  4. The  water use and evaporation rate is predicated upon the Livermore location with average high temperatures of 85  degrees. Here in the Coachella Valley we have over 120 days of 100 plus degree weather plus wind. The  projected water use/evaporation rates are completely inaccurate.  5. This development is a completely private  member only use enterprise. There will be no direct benefit, or even available use of this facility by citizens of La  Quinta. this is a members only Private Enterprise, yet they will be using valuable and scarce drinking water  directly from our aquafer. Think about it, thousands of our fellow Coachella Valley residents have no access to  clean, safe drinking water, yet this private enterprise will be allowed to squander this precious natural resource  on what.... a 20 second wave ride!!!! This is obscene!  Vote NO on changing the zoning that will allow this  project!  Vote No on this project!  This project is in the wrong place, at the wrong time, and is the wrong use of  the last large natural, stunning open space left in La Quinta. I encourage the City council members to live up the  the slogan of our city name...La Quinta... The Gem of the Desert. As city leaders you need to put the desires and  well being of your citizens ahead of MONEY. You need to protect the quiet, light pollution free, noise free,  peaceful residential ambience south La Quinta residents currently enjoy and expect. That is why we bought and  invested here!  Go do the right thing and just say NO! I purchased my house to stay away from the bustle of city noise and development!  This will forever affect our  lives and value of our neighborhood! Indio The sanction of a development that is scheduled to consume a massive amount of water for recreational  purposes ‐ in a location where water resources are scarce ‐ during a period in history when water resources are  historically low ‐ would be negligence at an aggrevated level.  We have a responsibility in our governance of land  and resources.  Let's exercise that governance judiciously by facilitating developments that are respectful of our  resources and natural environment.  Having previously sanctioned developments that consume large amounts  of water is not an excuse to continue that practice. Let's have La Quinta be the leaders of responsible  development in the Coachella Valley; not the contributors to waste.   You are considering changing the zoning from a residential area. This development will add a lot of noise and  traffic to our area. Not the right place for this development.  We are in a drought, I do not want the increase of traffic nor the noise. This does not belong in our  neighborhood. How many wave parks does the desert need? Palm Springs, Palm Desert and Coachella... what  sense does any of this make. We need to conserve water!  I want the city of LQ to leave the zoning as is.  We were attracted to La Quinta as a golf community and love the landscaping.  We love the starry skies at night.    The Citrus golf course is already involved in litigation over water usage from the aquifer.  How could we possibly  support using this much water for a wave park during a drought?  It’s irresponsible and we strongly object to  changing zoning laws Water Usage and Noise Pollution, not to mention traffic. We specifically chose this area to purchase our "final" home because it is so serene, beautiful, and neighbor  friendly.  It is difficult to find an area that still conveys a "small town feeling", this area spoke to us.  This wave  park does not belong in a quiet residential neighborhood.  The lights will destroy our star lit night skies, the  noise will destroy our quiet peace, the major in‐flux of people that do not live in the area on a regular basis  places our neighborhood at risk for increased police activity, the traffic during and after construction will result  in majorly increased traffic sounds and more wear and tear on our streets.  Right now there is a city in Central  California that does not have water due to well malfunction and drought conditions.  How can the city justify  allowing a wave park using so much of our potable water for recreation?  Golf resorts can at least use non‐ potable water.   I am begging, please do not destroy our peaceful community.  Virginia M. Nelson, Santerra The City Council has no right to impose on a majority of citizens such a project, against any ecological  justification, destroying the scenery and wasting unbelievably amount of water at a time of hard drought. I  believe money is behind this project and the decision makers will have one day to explain and justify their huge  Increased noise, traffic, water usage in what is clearly a residential area. Find another more suitable location so  as not to destroy the tranquility of this area! This is not compatible with the neighborhood or present zoning.    The area adjacent to the Coral Mountain west of Madison Avenue and south of Avenue 58 is currently zoned for  development as a low‐density golf community similar to those surrounding this location (Andalusia CC, Trilogy,  The Quarry, etc.).  Many of the local residents in this neighborhood own properties in this area in order to enjoy  a pre‐retirement or retirement lifestyle. Over a year ago the property in question was purchased by new owners  with a plan to develop a surf community with hotel and community amenities as well as a home building  component. It appears that this development will be the first attempt at incorporating this new wave  technology within an established residential area.    The developers described the overall objective to “create an  upscale private resort community.” After having studied the February 2021 Notice of Preparation, we feel this  will not at all resemble the beautiful upscale private communities that surround it. The developer is asking for  31% of this land to be zoned “Tourist Commercial” (121 of 386 acres). Phase One of the development will  consist of a wave machine attraction, a 150‐person hotel, 104 casita unit rentals, and what looks like  approximately 25 residences. There is also a public restaurant and shopping planned, and as hoped by the  developer, numerous annual events to draw in more public to the area.    At the center of our opposition, of  course, is the attraction being built on this commercial tourist land, the surf‐wave machine. We are extremely  concerned about this as an attraction, and feel very strongly that this is an irresponsible development that  should not be allowed to continue. Basic science shows that sound travels much farther at night than during the  day, as soundwaves bend downwards towards the cooler ground. In addition, the 80‐foot lights that are to  reflect on the wave machine will undoubtedly further add light pollution to the beautiful coral mountain and  dull our beautiful starry black night skies.  The promotion material from the developer for Coral Mountain  Resort says the Resort will include a "Surf Stadium". In fact, the largest Surf Stadium/Wave Basin in the world  right in the middle of a low‐density residential area.     We are La Quinta residents for responsible development.   We want La Quinta to remain The Gem of The Desert and we want the Coral Mountain to remain the gem of La  1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Sunday, June 5, 2022 2:55 PM To:Marge Pierce Cc:Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner Subject:Pierce, Marge: Coral Mtn Project - Please heed the drought realities and stop the wave Good afternoon Ms. Pierce, Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the project at the 6/7/2022 public hearing and will be included in the public record for the project. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: Marge Pierce <mppierce55@gmail.com>   Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 8:52 AM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: Please heed the drought realities and stop the wave  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Please believe the scores of articles regarding our frightening and historic drought.  The approval of the Coral Mountain  Wave Park will make La Quinta the national poster child for avarice and arrogant indifference to consequence.    https://drought.ca.gov/  Marge Pierce   PGA West  1 From:Susan Rosenberg <plmdsrtbrowne@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 9:37 AM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Written Comments on Resolution 2022-021 and 2022-022 ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear City Council,    Please vote NO to certify the environmental assessment and the specific plan to develop the Coral Mountain Resort as  proposed.  This project is wrong for our city at this time.    The planning commission had 3 NO votes to recommend approval of the plan and 2 NO votes to approve the  environmental impact report.  Please listen to their arguments against this project.  As an Environmental Health and Safety Specialist, I am very familiar with noise and hazard analysis.  The impact of  construction noise, lighting and vibration from the proposed surf park on our adjacent community of Trilogy is  unacceptable.  No one I know who resides here is in favor of this project.  It is a waste of money, and valuable resources,  mainly water.  We are in a drought.  The Coachella Valley has limited water, despite the CVWD assertion that they can  support this massive waste of water.    Let surfers surf in the ocean.  A surf park in the desert is not a good idea.    At the very least, let the voters of the city decide. Put this project on the ballot.  Susan Browne Rosenberg, Certified Industrial Hygienist   81154 Santa Rosa Ct.   La Quinta, CA  760‐902‐2545  1 From:Linda Joy Salas <ljoysalas@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 6:34 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:No on Coral Mountain Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  I would vote NO on the Coral Mountain Resort Wave Pool project as it is environmentally unsustainable.    ‐‐   Linda Joy Salas (CalBRE: 01192416)   760‐625‐5129  ljoysalas@gmail.com  1 From:Consulting Planner Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:07 PM To:Bruce T. Bauer; kfitzpartick@laquintaca.gov; John Pena; Steve Sanchez; Linda Evans; Robert Radi Cc:Jon McMillen; Cheri Flores; Monika Radeva Subject:Re: June 7, 2022 - La Quinta City Council Agenda Item No. 1 (Public Hearing )/ The Wave Festival Project Mr. Bauer,  Thank you for your comments. They will be provided to the City Council when they consider the application at  hearing this afternoon.  Nicole Sauviat Criste  Consulting Planner  City of La Quinta  From: Bruce T. Bauer <bauer@sbemp.com>  Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:00 PM  To: kfitzpartick@laquintaca.gov <kfitzpartick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez  <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner  <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: June 7, 2022 ‐ La Quinta City Council Agenda Item No. 1 (Public Hearing )/ The Wave Festival Project   ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Dear Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, City Councilmembers, Mr. McMillen, Ms. Flores and Ms. Criste:  Please find La Quinta Residents for Responsible Development’s (“LQRRD”) letter of today’s date concerning tonight’s  hearing regarding the Wave Festival Project.   Slovak Baron Empey Murphy & Pinkney LLP  Bruce T. Bauer   PALM SPRINGS   COSTA MESA   SAN DIEGO   PRINCETON   NEW YORK ____________________________________________  Bruce T. Bauer  2 Of Counsel  SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP  1800 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, California  92262  Phone (760) 322‐2275  / Fax (760) 322‐2107  https://sbemp.com/       CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e‐mail message, together with any documents, files and/or other messages attached to it, is for the sole use of the intended  recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended  recipient, please immediately notify the sender by telephone and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.  CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the United States Treasury Department, you are hereby informed that any  advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties  under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing.        June 7, 2022 Via Email & U.S. Mail Jon McMillen (jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov) City Manager, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Cheri Flores, (clflores@laquintaca.gov) Planning Manager, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Agenda Item No. 1 (Public Hearing1) Dear Mr. McMillen and Ms. Flores and Ms. Criste: As you know, our office represents residents in the City of La Quinta (“City”), La Quinta Residents for Responsible Development (“LQRRD”). 1 ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0010 AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2019-0003 (AMENDMENT V TO ANDALUSIA SPECIFIC PLAN), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20190002, ZONE CHANGE 2019-0004, SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0002, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005; INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCES APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2019-0004 AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0002; CEQA: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2021020310); LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58, NORTH OF AVENUE 60 AND EAST AND WEST OF MADISON STREET [RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-021 AND 2022-022; ORDINANCE NOS. 600 AND 601] BRUCE T. BAUER ATTORNEY ADMITTED IN CA REPLY TO: 1800 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 92262 T (760) 322-2275 F (760) 322-2107 bauer@sbemp.com City of La Quinta Planning Commission June 7, 2022 Page 2 SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP Palm Springs, CA T (760) 322-2275 Indian Wells, CA T (760) 322- 9240 Costa Mesa, CA T (714) 435-9592 San Diego, CA T (619) 501-4540 Princeton, NJ T (609) 955-3393 New York, NY T (212) 829-4399 www.sbemp.com On March 22, 2022, LQRRD submitted thorough comments on the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021020310) (“FEIR”) for the Coral Mountain Resort Project (“Project” and/or “Wave Festival Project”)(that letter was 17 pages long.) At the conclusion of the seven-hour meeting, the Planning Commission continued the hearing date and requested additional information. We then submitted another thorough comment letter dated April 12, 2022 (15 pages long) to the City regarding the FEIR and the concerns that were raised about the City’s use of MSA Consulting Inc. in the draft EIR and FEIR process. Those comments are now a part of the City’s administrative record in this matter. We trust that the City, and its elected officials, have all reviewed all of the above concerns anew in light of the City Council’s consideration of the FEIR. We believe that for the reason we have previously delineated that the City must refrain from acting on the Wave Festival Project until it has prepared and recirculated an EIR that fully complies with CEQA. A revised EIR is required to analyze and mitigate the proposed Project’s significant impacts. We do not believe that the current FEIR will withstand judicial scrutiny should the City approve it as currently drafted. There is another issue that has recently come to light that requires the City’s immediate attention. LQRRD had requested a public records act request on May 5, 2022, with ten (10) different categories of requested documents (the “PRAR”). As of the date of this letter, the City has not fully complied with the PRAR (although the ordinary response deadline for such a request is ten (10) days.) As of June 3, 2022, the City had responded as follows: The City is currently reviewing additional, potentially responsive, electronic correspondence between 10/28/2020 through 01/04/2021; from 02/17/21 through 09/13/2021, and from 12/16/2021 through 5/5/2022, which will be provided to you as soon as possible on a rolling production basis. Thus, the City has admitted that it has not fully complied with the PRAR. Therefore, LQRRD is being denied the production of these documents in advance of tonight’s meeting. It is therefore incumbent on the City to continue this matter over until such a time as those documents have been produced pursuant to the PRAR. Otherwise, LQRRD has been denied Due Process in this matter. CONCLUSION Based on the above concerns, it is urged that the City of La Quinta deny the Wave Festival Project as proposed by Applicant, and further deny the FEIR as proposed and require further study as requested. In any event, at a minimum, the City of La Quinta must continue this matter over until such a time as LQRRD has received the documents it has requested above in the PRAR. Sincerely, Bruce T. Bauer, Esq. City of La Quinta Planning Commission June 7, 2022 Page 3 SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP Palm Springs, CA T (760) 322-2275 Indian Wells, CA T (760) 322- 9240 Costa Mesa, CA T (714) 435-9592 San Diego, CA T (619) 501-4540 Princeton, NJ T (609) 955-3393 New York, NY T (212) 829-4399 www.sbemp.com cc: Linda Evans, Mayor (levans@laquintaca. gov) Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Mayor Pro Tem (kfitzpartick@laquintaca. gov) John Pena, Council Member (jpena@laquintaca. gov) Robert Radi, Council Member (rradi@laquintaca. gov) Steve Sanchez, Council Member (ssanchez@laquintaca. gov) Jon McMillen (jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov) Cheri Flores (clflores@laquintaca.gov) Nicole Sauviat Criste (ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov) 1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 11:36 AM To:Joan Speer Cc:Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner Subject:Speer, Joan: 06-07-2022 Written Comments PH1 Coral Mtn - NO on Coral Project Good afternoon, The written public comments provided via your email below will be provided to the City Council at the 6/7/2022 regular meeting and will be included in the public record for the meeting. Thank you. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: Joan Speer <speer.joan@yahoo.com>   Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 11:32 AM  To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: NO on Coral Project  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  City Council Meeting June 7, 2022 Dear City Council Members, Please vote NO on the Wave Pool and the Coral Project. For something this important, there should be a general consensus! Please consider the long-term effect of the wave pool. It is not sustainable and will cost the City and residents much more than is gained. This will also affect those of us in the Coachella Valley with water availability. I personally resent having to micromanage every drop of water! Please Vote NO. The whole Valley is paying attention!! Thank you, Joan Speer Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 From:Susan St Louis <suesaint24@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 12:22 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:Wave Pool ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Vote NO! Susan St Louis Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Dorian Whitney <dorian.whitney@icloud.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 4:06 PM To:City Clerk Mail Subject:CORRAL MOUNTAIN PUBLIC COMMENT Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** VOTE NO. OUR FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT. OUR WATER IS NOT FOR SALE. Sent from my iPhone Reasons Provided By Area Residents As To Why They Signed the SAY NO… TO CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT! Petition At: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/72BVMV5 We should not be wasting our valuable water resources on a surfing amusement park. Also,  The noise from the  parks speaker system will reverberate off of the mountain and disrupt the neighboring communities.   The  zoning should be left as a low density residential housing.  When California is in a drought situation and climate change is making this worse, adding a huge water waste  resort is foolish and not responsible.  Main reason we live where we live, Trilogy La Quinta is for the tranquil surroundings. We enjoy the dark skies,  rural feeling of this area of La Quinta. This project totally ruins this ambiance. So many people in our area don't  want this. Does the City Council care about the desires of it's La Quinta residents. I hope so!!! Ridiculus waste of water! We are in a severe drought and you’re going to limit our water to use for this resort.  In this critical time of climate change and given the state of the severe drought we are experiencing it would be  absurd to put in a surf park. The amount of water used and lost is a waste of a resource that is quickly becoming  precious.  Where do they think the water is going to come from as we are going towards a drought. You need to put a  wave park on the other side of the 10 where it won’t bother homeowners. It doesn’t need to be by us plus the  fact we don’t want to  hear the noise And the traffic. Please do not approve this project.  TOO many homes, too many people, too much night time light, and such a  waste of water in this time of severe drought. Unconscionable waste of a very precious resource. Drought in California. It’s so hot in the summer, who are they fooling no one is going to use it when it’s 120. I  feel this project is a waste of money. We are in the worst drought in the last 120 years! Noise pollution, aquifer depletion, dark sky loss, noise effect on endangered sheep. Inviting the WAVE to go bankrupt and leaving behind an eyesore for the residents and a place for the homeless  hide out and a breed ground rodent's! Due to the ongoing drought, it makes absolutely no sense to approve such an egregious waste of potable water  which will have to come from the water source that provides potable water to every home and business in the  Coachella Valley. Coral Mountain Resort does NOT belong here in the desert!!!! Water use is excessive especially when water is limited in our Valley, and in CA.  There is nothing good about  this project as far as I can see.  Water conservation. This doesn't belong in a residential neighborhood. Traffic, WATER USE IN A DROUGHT, number of short term rentals, lights,   There shouldn't be any question ass to why this is opposed.  SURF..Desert...oh please.  We are in a  drought..what else is there to say.  and No I don't believe for an instant that the WAVE would not use valuable  water resources.  Silverrock is a damn good example of water waste. Reasoning is such a scam to do something like that .   We don’t need more unnecessary water usage in the desert.  The water crisis in the southwest is extreme. Lake Powell is at an all time low and the DOI is concerned about  the rivers ability to provide water and power to the region in the next 12 months. The greed of developers does  not consider the climate crisis we are faced with and only cares about profit and not the livability of the valley.  We need to stop with this reckless development. This project will not only impact the residents of La Quinta, but also those of us who live and work in the  Coachella Valley.  It is wrong on so many levels:  1.  It will use water from a shared aquifer.  There is no  guarantee that there is 20 years’ of groundwater, no snowpack replenishing the groundwater, and the Colorado  river allocations are being reduced.  How can you justify the use of water for the entertainment of a few when  residents  are required to reduce water usage?  Will resort visitors be asked to limit their showers?  Remember,  every drop counts.  2. The project will require massive amounts of energy.  Will the resort and wave machine be  asked to cut their usage during peak hours as we are asked to do?  Will resort visitors be asked to limit their use  of air conditioning during peak hours as we are asked to do?  Will the resort continue business as usual during  brownouts?  3.  The environmental impact will be significant, despite what your EIR states ‐ this is common  sense.  The stadium lighting is truly frightening.  4.  The jobs will most likely be the same level of jobs as at all the  other resorts in the Valley.  Will these workers make a living wage in order to afford a home in the community ‐  or anywhere for that matter?  Will these jobs provide benefits?  5.  The project will benefit a select and elite   population.  Explain why the residents and workers of Coachella Valley are asked to sacrifice precious resources  in order for people to be entertained at this resort and wave park?  6.  How many surf/wave parks can the  Valley support during an historic drought?  Explain to the people of California at large, the farmers, the ranchers,  the dialysis clinics and the hospitals why this project is a good idea.   This project is an affront to residents across  the Coachella Valley.  I urge you to vote “No.” Water/Lights/Traffic/Change in La Quinta Development Plan.  I can be more specific, but if anyone doesn't  understand these concerns they are not tuned in and they haven't read the news, both local and National.   Please stop this ridiculous development. WE NEED OUR WATER FOR DRINKING AND FOR OUR PLANTS, NOT FOR SURFING IN THE DESERT! STOP THIS  PROJECT! An amusement park located next to a retirement community, zoned for the last 20 years as residential low  density is just wrong, and unfair to the current residents.  Not to mention the fact we are in a historic drought,  and our city leaders are even considering a private wave water waster. Just wrong wrong wrong. La Quinta is a premier residential community, not a tourist destination.  Do not change this what made La  Quinta a great place to live! Due to the severe drought conditions it is unconscionable to approve a private water park facility that wastes  beyond billions and billions of gallons water, squandering such a precious resource is catastrophic. How much  water will be wasted accumulatively over the next ten, twenty or thirty years? Not to mention the magnitude of  water use will will cause residential water prices to skyrocket because there will less water availability. Not to  mention the number of short term vacation rentals will bring numerous problems and affect residential home  values in a negative way. La Quinta is an upscale small city and it is in the best interest of all to preserve it as one  with responsible environmental building. Water use is unconscionable.  Light pollution and noise pollution are also important factors.  Changing zoning is  a taking from the people who live around it and requires monetary compensation if it goes forward. No matter what they say, the project will use millions of gallons of water more than current use.  It is prudent to  wait at least a few years to see how this drought works out.  If it continues we will be happy this project was  stopped. If the rain cycles change you can always do it then. This is not the place for a WAVE pool.  Too much noise, traffic & pollution. I am concerned with the increased traffic and transitional population/vacationers for our permanent residence. A surf park in our desert is fundamentally wrong. It will steal water from our aquifer that cannot be replenished  from a drying up Colorado River. Please do not believe CVWD on this. We are in a drought, why come to the desert when the ocean is 2hrs away,  the planned area is beautiful how it  is the mountains have history  we don’t need the traffic  Building an artificial surf park in the desert is a totally inappropriate use, and a waste of, our limited water  resources, during a period of unprecedented drought. We’re living in one of the worst droughts.  Not one good reason to end this madness once and for ALL We shouldn’t even have to consider this ridiculous and appalling “development” at Coral mountain. The idea of  a large wave park resort in that pristine mountain area as well  as a total disregard for Californias dire water  situation is greedy and thoughtless. La Quinta already has the Talus development going up which will bring in  plenty of extra revenue for the City. Not to mention the added traffic on Madison‐and the lights and noise that  will most definitely affect the existing communities surrounding that property.  We are about to restrict water use in our homes.  This will evaporate more water in a day than I use in a year.   The traffic will prevent normal access to our area and slow the emergency response time.  This could cause  unnecessary  deaths. There's a drought. WHY is the project even being considered.  This is a waste of water as we are being asked to conserve. It's not just the water for the wave pool but also the  entire develpment.  It will increase congestion in our area already threatened by the Talea development just a  few miles away.    This is all about greed and money and not in the best interest of our community.  This is a waste of water as we are being asked to conserve. It's not just the water for the wave pool but also the  entire develpment.  It will increase congestion in our area already threatened by the Talea development just a  few miles away.    This is all about greed and money and not in the best interest of our community.  Concerned about the CA drought, water rationing, Lake Mead at 30% of capacity, which means this is the wrong  project at the wrong time Very concerned about the CA drought and water rationing for several counties, and Lake Mead at 30% of  capacity. This  is the wrong project at the wrong time. This project is an unnecessary waste of two critical resources that are already in short supply ‐ Water and  Electricity.  Additionally, it will create unplanned traffic in this far end of  La Quinta.   The development is completely opposite of the type of development that would maintain La Quinta's drawing  point‐ it's relaxed, quiet not‐so‐busy place for persons and families to visit and for our residents to enjoy.  The  development will take precious water from our city and it's residents and is blatently an attempt by wealthy  developers to make significant profits at the expense of changing our environment. If home owners are required to water rationing/reduction to supply a wave park  it is time to sell and find a  community that think of its homeowners first. We do not need anything like this in the Coachella Valley, especially in La Quinta.  We are a residential  community.  We do not need more traffic, stadium lights or lack of respect for water conservation.  This project  adds nothing to our community, just a few privileged bringing a different attitude that we need. We purchased our home because the property on 58th St & Madison was zoned residential, and it was our  objective to live in a residential not resort area. It is unconscionable to those of us who consider this our home  that the city would change zoning ‐ bait & switch. We should not let development 'at any cost' override the  quality of life that we have and want in LaQuinta. We were impressed when we decided to live in LaQuinta that,  unlike the other desert cities, the city preserved its neighborhoods and therefore the community feeling.  Largely, commercial areas were kept toward Hwy111 or dispersed into "village" like areas. Now this thoughtful  planning and quality of life will be eradicated. This would be the 3rd wave project in the desert ‐ how many  waves do we need in the desert? I watched a "60 Minutes" segment on preserving Fogo Island in Canada. I think  the interviewer asked a question the Council should think about. Question: "What's your response to the  capitalist who would say, why are you limiting your growth? Answer: That is the techno‐economic question. But  I start with a different question. What are we optimizing for? We are optimizing for place. We're optimizing for  community."  I hope that is the same answer that our City Council would give. Even if you really convince  yourself that this is not an environmental contradiction to our city and state objectives, there is still no way one  can rationalize this project as good for 'community'. Please keep residential zoning for Coral Mountain.   I agree, it's a terrible idea! I have been against this project since the beginning,  The La Quinta City Council should be ashamed of their  selves, It is always about money.   Increased traffic, noise pollution, continuous water waste,  electricity waste, light pollution, negative impact  on  natural & biological resources, dwindle acquifer & Colorado River Canal Supplies A never‐ending cycle of sporting events and other “party festival‐like” attractions does not belong in a zone  established for sublime and tranquil residential living. I'm concerned about traffic, noise, lights, increase in crime, water usage, property values falling, stress on the  cities infrastructure, and a extra burden on fire, police, and emergency services. La Quinta’s character of longer term leases and owner occupancy will be lost to the traffic, noise and lights.  Water waste and air pollution NOT needed either! No to the Surf Park.  We came here to get away from Crowds, Noise, Graffiti, and we came here because it is so  peaceful. We have a water shortage and we don’t need to to build or create another way to use up the resources   I live in a community very close to the project.  With concerns with drought in this state, how does this appear  to others, such as farmers in central California who are being asked to limit which crops they can grow, and  others currently being asked to conserve water.  We settled here for the peace, quiet, and beauty of the area.   Have you ever been to a water park?  There is a reason that they have been built away from residential areas.   The noise and the vibration.  We are concerned about wildlife, and rightly so. Concessions are being given to  them in the final EIR.  What about us?  Noise measurements were taken in 10 areas, none into the community  of Trilogy.  Why?  I think the developers know how significant the impact will be there. It will certainly affect  other communities nearby as well with increased traffic. And the 4 mini Coachellas we can anticipate? The same  individual who manages noise at Coachella tells us that the sound of machinery to power the wave will only be  at 65dB.  Convenient.  What about the other ambient noise?  Is this in keeping with demographics of the  surrounding communities.?  I think, like us, a largely older population, who came  for the beauty, peace, and  quiet.  We never anticipated such a project in our backyard.  Did we expect future development near us?   Certainly, but an amusement park for surfers, running from 7 in the morning to 10 at night, with 17‐ 80 foot tall  lights, and not accessible to others ?  Can anyone honestly say this is in keeping with the general plan?  What  made La Quinta the "Gem of the Desert"?  It's people like ourselves  who have supported you and contributed  to your growth.  Don't we deserve some consideration?  I would just ask that common sense prevail here.   I bought here for peace and quiet. Not busy crowded roads like Orange County. We are in a DROUGHT!! Plus we do NOT need to waste our land in our BEAUTIFUL town with RIDICULOUS  PROJECTS like the WAVE & IT'S TOWN PROJECT!! I VOTE NO, NO, NO!!! For ALL the many reasons that have been stated and it would be the most undesirable project for this area of  the town. Wrong location. There are more suitable locations for this type of venue, particularly with the vacant land in the  North East Valley. In my opinion, this project would result in the waste of much needed water, which especially critical during this  time of drought and climate change.  The entire state of California, and much of the west coast has suffered  from a drought for many years, with no end in sight.  It would be irresponsible to promote a project that would  waste precious desert water.    Additionally, this project would increase greenhouses gases and therefore  intensify climate change. The project would also result in other negative effects, such as pollution and other  problems associated with increased numbers of people (vandalism, theft, etc.), loss of the beautiful scenic  views, and waste of electricity.  Please consider the needs of the entire Coachella Valley, and all of the residents  when you review this project.  Please deny the Coral Mountain Resort rezoning as we need RESPONSIBLE  development, not development that would result in the serious problems listed above.  Thank you for your time. Having a wave park in this desert with a drought going on is ridiculous!!!  to save our very limited water supply for residents and the natural world rather than for a water park Excessive use of water so much needed here already for other purposes is my primary concern.  This is also  followed by the drain on electrical resources, plus the effect on scenic views and wildlife havitats. Sends the wrong message about the importance of water conservancy. Projects like this send the wrong message concerning community focus on water conservation. 100% against allowing an amusement park / resort of this magnitude in a quiet residential community.   Irresponsible in the time of historic drought to move to construct a 24 million gallon a year wave pool.  We need  to step back and look at water use in the Coachella Valley in a responsible manner.  Start now and vote not on  this project.   Google Colorado River.  ALL of our water comes from the Colorado River.  Don't prioritize elitist  recreation at the price of water coming out of our tap.   I have lived in the desert my entire life and see it changing into an LA suburb. We should keep the desert pristine  and full of the solitude that attracts people. Building on every corner and attractions to keep people busy is not  the highlight. Nature is the highlight.  Common sense tells me that a water park in the desert during the worst drought in state history is STUPID!! It will destroy the nature of this community.  It will destroy the dark skies.  Water is sparse why does the city  want to waste it? California is in the most severe drought in history.  A wave pool blatantly ignores this climate change emergency. It's a HUGE waste of water. The traffic on Madison is already heavy and it is difficult at times to cross Madison from our community and  exit. The added traffic alone from this project will negatively affect our area. Water shortages and restrictions loom.  We don't need a wave park that will take more of our precious water. This is a desert community. The entire state is suffering from drought. Shameful waste of precious water. We are being asked to conserve  on water and be assigned to restricted watering days, so how can you account  for this excess use of water?   Water shortage Wrong project for this area not to mention the waste of our water but also the light, noise and traffic pollution  wrong for this peaceful residential area. It is crazy to think to built and approve a water park of any kind here in the Desert when the whole state of  California is going through a drought. I plead to you to reconsider and wait until the State is no longer going  through a drought is it too much to ask....this will affect everyone.  Waste of water Agree with all of the above. Agree with all the above. Water depletion!!! Developer and local LaQuinta officials have no regard for the residents, for noise pollution, water consumption  or air pollution. We need to protect our aquifer and residents interests. Rather than develop something that brings in temporary  visitors with traffic, loud noise and wasteful water usage, the project developers should think about what the  local residents need. Water for future generations, affordable housing and jobs creation. This project not only will require a lot of power from IID, it will also use mega amounts of water. Plus the fact  that they want to build it as a rental community which will make it party central, I hope the city is willing to hire  more policemen. I think the fact that the city wants the revenue has blinded them to the facts. Water Waste in a time of Water concerns, Cost of running this extravagant resort. Overcrowding a community  that has limited access. Very irresponsible decision the Mayor should  know people do not want this Activity  Park put in to our lovely Quaint community.  This is not progress.    Traffic, noise from more traffic, too much use of water. We are in a severe drought with the situation worsening each year.  They will be taking water from the aquifers  and Colorado River, not potable water. We own a home in beautiful Laquinta. I don’t understand how this wave project could even be considered here  with our long term drought issues! Our property values will decrease overtime due to increased traffic, Noise,  trash in the streets and lack of precious water. We need to clean up the toxic Salton Sea disaster before  diverting more water to recreational pursuits. Please stop the wave project before it’s too late. This is another way for greedy people to make money, at the expense of "we the people".  We will be water  rationed even more than we are now.  There are miles and miles of free surfable coastline in California and  around the World.  Other surf parks are becoming obsolete.  The whole idea for a surf park in La Quinta goes  against the sophisticated image that La Quinta projects.  We don't want a Carnival image of our beautiful La  There has and will be water rationing again.  Surf parks have certainly failed elsewhere, and it will be throwing  away money for the build, and will hurt the residents of La Quinta.  We are  hours from a real beach.  It would  never last out here and I do not want to suffer my water being rationed, especially with the taxes we already  Each Citizen of the City of La Quinta have been asked to be more cognizant about our families water usage or  face large fines for any excess usage as determined by State, County and Local regulations that do nothing but  become a financial burden on our residents.     Why allow Big business' to move in to town and blatantly abuse  our precious water resources? If they really wish to move forward with this project it should be considered for  another part of the Coachella Valley.      Should this project be irresponsibly moved forward then, all La Quintas  residents should have their complete, monthly water bills paid by the developers and then by the Corporations  that own and operate these parks on a daily basis. Fining our residents for excess water usage would be criminal  should the City Council "APPROVE"  This project will destroy the quality of life in our area of La Quinta! To protect the environment & save water during a drought. When citizens & homeowners are expected to  adhere to restrictions on water use, the privileged few shouldn’t ruin it for all of us  The Coachella Valley is in a constant state of drought. Regardless of technology, this proposal and the wanton  waste of water use is unsupportable. Please deny this application in this form. There are severe water shortages in the west and this is a completely  irresponsible way to manage what little  water is in the desert. Think long term, not short term tax basis. If the water is gone then no one can ever live in  this area. There is much concern about the water shortage in the desert.  This is a very irresponsible addition to the  community.  A wave park is an irresponsible use of water. The southwest is in the midst of a severe drought. Dryist year in 1200 years. Hello? I've been a desert resident most of my life. I've owned my home in La Quinta for over 27 years. This kind of  project DOES NOT belong in La Quinta let alone the Coachella Valley. We are facing MAJOR Climate Changes all  over the world. The desert temperatures reach over 120 degrees every summer. This is a complete and total  WASTE of WATER!!!! Not to mention disrupting the peace and tranquility of the La Quinta community for a  Private Resort. This type of project SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY!!!!!!!!!!! La Quinta Palm Desert‐we have serious water issues already and a resort requiring this volume of water is not sustainable  Palm Desert. Water restrictions and increased costs imposed upon residents already. Make the  developer sign a  50+ yr commit and fund a water bond to get ‘skin in the game’ and leave Coachella better than it will impact the  valley.  Please save the water for those who live and work In Coachella. For now and the future. Madison is loud enough with racing cars!  La Quinta would be hurt by this wave park because of traffic, more  STRs and scientifically, it is not a wise addition to our community .  A total waster of water. Madison is loud enough with racing cars!  La Quinta would be hurt by this wave park because of traffic, more  STRs and scientifically, it is not a wise addition to our community .  A total waster of water. Global warming major water drought now is not the time to proceed with the development.  As civic leaders  please reconsider your support for this project.  The dominio affect of the drought will be felt for many years to  come.  What we really need is affordable housing for the residents already here.  Think responsible it’s can’t  always be about the money.  The city has done well let’s just stay on track and think about us already living here.   Irresponsible water use; why does the desert need potentially 4 surf parks; dislike the potential short‐term lease  factor; loss of open spaces. We're all supposed to reduce our use of our dwindling supply of water.  Will this project help to deal with the  oncoming crisis?  Obviously not.  This is sheer stupidity!! Irresponsible use of our dwindling water supply.  Not enough resourse to support all these new residents and  visitors. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE WATER WE DO NOT HAVE TO WASTE.  THERE IS NO FINANCIAL GAIN TO THE  COMMUNITY.  WE DO NOT NEED THIS PROJECT THIS PROJECT WILL NOT BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY.  WE ARE IN A CRITICAL DROUGHT CYCLE.  THIS IS A WASTE  OF VALUABLE WATER.  WE DO NOT NEED A WAVE PARK.  PERIOD. It’s unconscionable at a time where we going to be water rationing that a water wave park is even being  considered. It is absurd to allow a wave park to be built when there is such a severe water shortage. A huge waste of precious water.  Our location is a desert.  Who will give us water when all have none? This will deplete our water supplies, strain our electricity, and bring too many people which will burden our  community.  Water use rules that are in place already. The use of water we don't have enough to spare is thoughtless. The noise and lights are something we don't  want in our quiet desert environment. The traffic that will come during building and occupancy of this project is  unwelcome. !!   This is not the time or place for this kind of development for all the afore mentioned reasons. I vehemently  object to this project as a consiencius human being and as a concerned resident of Trilogy at LQ. With the state experiencing severe drought related water shortages and an ever increasing demand on an  already strained electrical grid makes one juestion the judgment and ethics and short sighted vision of any  group pushing this project, what were they thinking or were they just looking at the fees they would collect for  backing a project such as this here an now isn't just wrong,it for lack of a better term is obscene.    With the state experiencing severe drought related water shortages and an ever increasing demand on an  already strained electrical grid makes one juestion the judgment and ethics and short sighted vision of any  group pushing this project, what were they thinking or were they just looking at the fees they would collect for  backing a project such as this here an now isn't just wrong,it for lack of a better term is obscene.    We are in a drought, why would you even consider allowing a wave park to be built in this area.  We are concerned with wasting scarce desert water and electricity for a private surfing resort.  Also don't want  our peaceful area to be flooded with noise and light pollution, traffic jams, more special events that overcrowd  and bring about other problems. Not to mention climate impacts that this will bring about. Waste of water! No water park. Too much traffic and environmental strain. How can they say all that building will  not have an  impact This is a complete waste of vital water resources.  There is an ocean about 2 hours away where people can surf.  It is free without wasted resources. The waste of a precious resource,water! There is not enough water in the Coachella Valley for the residents who already live here; and we are already  too crowded, with Air B&Bs surrounding us.  This used to be a nice quiet village.  Now we have screaming  vacationers all around us.  We're being crowded out.  Take your greedy selves away from here.  There are  already too many like you here!  La Quinta ‐  I live in Trilogy by the berm where the noise, possibility of more people walking on the berm and  light pollution would be a definite bother. Not to mention the traffic and how this zoning change could affect  future development. Please say NO! I oppose the commercial rezoning for this project. I live in Trilogy and the traffic impact, noise and lights are  excessive. This project, WITHOUT the Commercial pleces and Surf Park is zoned for proper future development.   Wasteful, wonton goodie for the rich, not for the citizens. You should be ashamed.  As a resident of La Quinta City, I am against the development of a privatized recreation space, especially one  that uses water, a scarce public resource. I think it is unreasonable due to being under a severe drought for  years and it is expected to continue.  Besides that, this development and its events will enormously increase the  traffic in our city which has only two main exits.  This project is going to benefit the developers and a few  people, but not the whole community.   Our city manager and representatives should listen to the concerns of  all the la Quinta residents, not just the developers and affluent residents.   The city should have developed a  better, big public park for the recreation of the whole community.  Is that not going to create revenue for the  city?  Probably not enough, right?  that is why it has not been done.  I am also against the construction of so  many short‐term vacation rentals because that will contribute to more disruption in our city including heavy  I'm concerned about the unprecedented drought and inevitable water restrictions.  Without water, all that we  have becomes worthless.  It does not seem appropriate or conducive to the environment of such a beautiful, natural land. Noise and light  pollution. Increase greenhouse gases and climate impacts. It has already been zooned for the proper  I object because water is too precious to be used for this private project. Environmentally the proposed wave  pool is wrong!!! This would drain our aquifer and contribute to noise air and traffic pollution in an area already struggling with  these problems. This project is not compatible with our residential environment , and existing infrastructure will  not support this type of development. We are concerned about the unnecessary depletion of our water resources for the valley.  Keep the surfing at  the beach... it's not that far away.  This truly is the wrong project for our community...our town...our time. This project could easily move SOUTH,  to Indio or beyond. They want to build here because we have a wonderful, unique environment...so they wish to  cash in on what we built. Please, vote no. We must protect La Quinta ‐ it's a GEM now, but could easily become  a tin cup. Put us first, please Greenhouse gas impacts, light pollution, traffic, noise pollution, water waste during a drought, electricity waste,  and most of all, the destruction of the peace and beauty that is the nature of  La Quinta. Do we really want to  become another Anaheim?  NO!!!!  We live in a tranquil area.   The water consumption of 180,000 is to much when we need to conserve water. This  will be another Salton sea project that was a big deal at one time and now is nothing but smelly resort.  The  traffic will be too much as we have to deal with the Coachella Festival and Stage coach.   Please leave the valley  to how it is.   Surfers can go to Malibu beach or Hawaii. After 25 years in this desert I want to be able to drink & water plants not have aquifer drained for play. A native  Californian who lives in the desert & wants to keep it as a desert. I'm the meantime being asked to conserve my  water usage that can't compare to surfing needs. Please don't build this ridiculous waste of water. La Quinta  Because of what it will do to our water supply and the 80 ft tall light towers also the safety of our  community.  Noise light pollution destroying tranquility. Environmental impact and water use  Environmental impact water use in drought area  This is ludicrous. How short sighted and uneducated is this proposal!  Water!  We are asked to conserve, do it  naturally and willingly. Then our ‘leaders?’ entertain this idea. I’m overwhelmed  Very bad use of water.  Water for The but non for me attitude is very disappointing.  Don't come to us for more  reductions in use of water in the future. Very bad use of water.  Water for The but non for me attitude is very disappointing.  Don't come to us for more  reductions in use of water in the future. CA is in a drought. This venue will cause congestion to our area, water waste, electricity waste and huge  environmental devastation. Big dollars should not be the factor for this venue. No to this waste! I think doing a water project in the desert is simply wrong. I would be in favor of any project which is linked to  cleaning the salted sea, not adding another water park man made!  Water and electricity shortages  Wasting this much water should never be acceptable. This wave project is completely ridiculous and unnecessary in the context of California's continuing drought, and  it totally fails to take into account the reason we La Quinta residents have chosen to live in the desert in the first  as opposed to the Pacific Ocean/beach only a 2hr drive to the west! In addition, we are privileged to live near  the Anza‐Borrego desert which is designated as one of only 5 of the official dark sky areas in California, and any  source of night lighting with 80ft towers will impact this rare designation. Locally it will adversely affect our  beautiful evening darkness and quiet in the surrounding residential areas not to mention the disruption to the  local desert wildlife that depend on true desert conditions to survive. I do not believe this project is healthy for  human or animal life with the impractical use of land along with stealing from our PRECIOUS drinking water  aquafer in the desert ‐ it's absurd!  Our city council needs to act responsibly to preserve our community and  deny this project immediately! They are answerable to their constituency...  It is irresponsible to allow rezoning for a water park while we are in the midst of a severe drought. Considering the ongoing drought, this plan is ridiculous and criminal. Also the desert heat will cause lots of  evaporation which could actually affect the climate. If people want ocean‐like activities, they should go to a  beach community.    Waste of water. We are in a continuous drought and this is a desert. We are being asked to conserve water. It is  inconceivable that this type of project could even be considered  We’ve been told over and over that we’re in a massive drought ‐ it would be irresponsible to build this park until  we recover. Lake Powell is at a unprecedented low ‐ at least get it half full before approving this wast of water!  The amount of water required  for this project is obscene. The daily water evaporation projections alone make  the Wave Project untenable.  The stress on the below ground water resources will make for shortages long into  the future. By voting in favor of the Wave Project, those members of La Quinta City Council look seriously  suspicious and as if they are in the developers’ pocket. This project is completely wrongheaded. La Quinta is not  the right place or and this is absolutely the wrong time for such a waste of our most precious water resource.    Please consider the long term negative impact on our community and Vote No on The Wave Project. Thank you.  The amount of water required  for this project is obscene. The daily water evaporation projections alone make  the Wave Project untenable.  The stress on the below ground water resources will make for shortages long into  the future. By voting in favor of the Wave Project, those members of La Quinta City Council look seriously  suspicious and as if they are in the developers’ pocket. This project is completely wrongheaded. La Quinta is not  the right place or and this is absolutely the wrong time for such a waste of our most precious water resource.    Please consider the long term negative impact on our community and Vote No on The Wave Project. Thank you.  Its completely beyond stupidity... really... a private resort in our backyard to destroy our peace and quiet along  with all the wildlife around us. Let alone the huge environmental impact!!! But I'm guessing its all about the BIG  $$$ not peoples lives!!!! 1.Concerned that the water for the CMR will be taken from the aquifer below The Quarry at La Quinta, which  will result in water shortages to the Quarry, one of the country's premier golf course.  2. Concerned that there is  only one street access to The Quarry at La Quinta.  If the CMR is situated at the corner of 58th and Madison,  there will be days we cannot enter or leave our home at the Quarry.  It is clear that Indio doesn't have the  infrastructure to hose the CV Festivals.  La Quinta doesn't have the infrastructure for the CMR.   This is not a  good site for such a development.   1.Concerned that the water for the CMR will be taken from the aquifer below The Quarry at La Quinta, which  will result in water shortages to the Quarry, one of the country's premier golf course.  2. Concerned that there is  only one street access to The Quarry at La Quinta.  If the CMR is situated at the corner of 58th and Madison,  there will be days we cannot enter or leave our home at the Quarry.  It is clear that Indio doesn't have the  infrastructure to hose the CV Festivals.  La Quinta doesn't have the infrastructure for the CMR.   This is not a  good site for such a development.   Increased traffic.  Short term rentals are often abused by people who don’t respect the area.  Potential  increased crime.  Eliminates the charm of LaQuinta.   We live in the desert and water should not be wasted like the wave will do.   The usage of too much water. Light pollution, noise, possible short term rental and festival type problems, traffic, water and electricity waste.  Also concerned for possible flooding if something were to go wrong, ie earthquake or other issue causing  flooding problems I understand the City wants to bring in income through taxes etc.  This is the wrong project for continued  income for the City. A beautiful health spa w fine boutiques, stunning homes and golf course would be a  consistent revenue source as the client base for the spa and boutiques is already established w the surrounding  communities. La Quinta should maintain a luxury image that will produce more income by drawing in wealthier  clientele than stooping low to an amusement park venture that is wrong for all the various reasons that have  been previosly mentioned. There are several individuals who could purchase the land ‐ this is a no brainer. So  please jump out of the current would be developers back pockets, and do the right thing.   Best,    Carol Shaw Terrible idea in a beautiful and peaceful area.  How can the City Council even consider such a mis‐placed project.    i guess money talks.  I will support lawsuits going forward if this passes.    I agree that is not appropriate for the location or regarding issues of shortage of water resources. This planned resort for a surfing development is stupid and should not be allowed. Do not allow this to happen Totally inappropriate to re‐zone  this and mix use this in residential area  As a full time resident of La Quinta, I am in favor of responsible development that will benefit our community.  Coral Mountain Resort is not an example of responsible development.     My main concern for re‐zoning is the  extraordinary use of precious resources for a private venture that has no access or benefit to the local  community. It can only add pollution, in many forms, to the local environment. We don’t have enough water for farmers and it will only get worse. There is a water shortage!     My personal information is not for solicitation.  I am opposed to this project.  This is an issue if water.  This  project puts too much pressure on our water table and does not consider the environment.   This is a crazy idea....we're in a drought!  Not to mention why do we need another water park when there are 2‐ 3 others in the valley? We moved to La Quinta for the Beauty ,peace and quiet  not a waterpark.. The millions of gallons of wasted  water for this park is ridiculous. The noise that it’s going to make and the light should not be Allowed.A ton  more people that will be coming in trashing our neighborhoods. Please vote against this happening to us.  this is not appropriate for this area, and will affect environment and quality of life, not to mention waste of  WATER! And, destroying the beauty of the Coral Mountain (petroglyphs, "bathtub ring" on the mountain,  tranquility). With water such a precious resource and we are in a drought with no end in sight, it seems ridiculous to allow a  wave park that will use 18 million gallons of water. Please do not allow this.  With climate change and water shortages only worsening, it is not appropriate or wise to open and maintain the  water park  I'll keep it brief: this will waste water and electricity all for a Private Surfing Resort, Create Noise and Light  Pollution, Adversely Affect the Desert Climate, Reduce our "Gem of the Desert" into a crowded and wasteful  eyesore that will only serve as a cautionary tale of just how badly La Quinta got it wrong. Let's not become "that  kind of city." We can do much better than that. It’s an ill‐ advised, short sighted attack on our community, our desert ecosystem & our precious and limited  water resources.  Noise, traffic, lights and water conservation  This resort would change our quiet enjoyment of the area and why we purchased in the area. We always loved  the dark star filled nights and little traffic. This resort would completely destroy all of what we love about our  corner of the desert.  Do not want anymore development in our City. It will make more congestion and more traffic problems. Also a  wave park is more centered around a younger crowd. La Quinta is more of a retirement golfing community and  we don't need this kind of activity that doesn't pertain to the area. La Quinta is a nice quiet town and adding this  monstrosity on top of all the other new plans for building is changing it into something that will not be  enjoyable for the people who come here to live and get away from big city life. That is one of the most biggest waste of water and land, and peoples sanity I have ever heard.  Tell those young  grads with education, and no maturity or common sense to stop coming up with these hair brained ideas. I am against the change in zoning, wasting water we don’t have, disruption of nature, and the traffic.       I might have signed this petition before, months ago.  Not sure.  If I could I would sign it in opposition to that  Wavepark a million times more. I'm NOT anti‐growth. I'm against stupid, conspicuously consumptive growth.            For the private benefit of a few score of very rich surfers and the public benefit of a City naturally hungry for  tax revenues, the Planning Commission and the City of La Quinta seem poised to do the following:  1) to ignore  the screaming climatological and ecological indicators that there could hardly be a project More Wrong than  this one, at this place, at this time;  2) to pull a cynical "bait and switch" on opposed fellow La  Quintans by first  having promised them via Zoning Laws and the General Plan of 2035 NEVER  to do the very thing you NOW  seem to be seriously considering doing ‐‐ reneging on those very  promises:  "Sorry, fellow La Quintans, we  really didn't  mean what we said on paper there, and, well, you know, heh, heh, I mean, we're talkin' real money  here."   And 3): You seem poised, even after the outrage of that conflict‐of‐interest enabled and bought‐and‐ paid‐for joke of a DEIR ‐‐‐ and yes, even after the citizen avalanche of substantive  opposition letters and 3‐ minute  public presentations at a SERIES of City meetings ‐‐‐ you seem poised to allow yourselves to be  narcotized into consent not only by the great John Gamlin's unctuous (and time‐unlimited) reassurances but,  what is much worse, by the say‐anything (and time‐unlimited) hogwash responses to opposition points by the  Developer's legal counsel.            Please, don't let short‐term profit thinking ‐‐ your own or others' ‐‐ hook you  into making the wrong long‐term decision for La Quintans, for California, or for the Earth.   Very sincerely yours,   Wrong place It would waste our precious water and electricity which could cause unnecessary outages.  When I purchased my property 19 years ago, there was no talk of a future complete rethinking of the land use  on the books. My wife and I have owned property all over California and have never experienced this kind of  underhandedness by a government organization. With the constant media reminders of water shortages, how  are we even entertaining this project. I am a firm believer in allowing local governments to manage themselves,  but maybe the state needs to interviene on this one. I'd recommend passing this fiasco on to them. Most concerned about adding additional traffic to Madison as we live in PGA West. This is even more important  during festival season.  Waste of water and does not fit in in the Desert!! Stupid idea!! Are we trying to be all things to all people ??  please don't let this happen , we wish to keep LA QIINTA PEACEFUL..NOISE, WATER AN ELECTRIC WASTE,  NOT  CONDUSIVE HERE!  NO TO THE SURF PARK ITS JUST TOO MUCH WATER USED,NOISE POLLUTION..DESTROYS WHAT WEHAVE IN LA QUINTA Don’t approve this project…….we are facing terrible drought…..wrong thing to do!!!!! Influx of transients destroying our privacy. Drought conditions density increase noise. Lights. The proposal is  ridiculous.    I live off Madison and the traffic on that street is already busy and loud. This development will mostly use  Madison as access north and only make the street busier. We moved here for the quiet, and also for the dark  sky here, and we do not want the lights from this development to impact the current dark sky effect. We retired to Trilogy for the peaceful living....the water park will have a large impact in the environment  state wide water shortage‐‐stop the new building..fix the Salton sea before the environmental disaster. insane‐water shortage‐ I am disappointed that a project that wastes so much water is even being considered in our desert.  How is the  City of La Quinta and CVWD asking residents to conserve water while approving a project of this scope?  I have lived all over the Coachella Valley‐ Indio, Palm Desert, La Quinta… this project is a big mistake for the  desert!  We already use more than 25% of our water for golf courses!  We should be putting money into saving  the Salton Sea and thereby saving southern CA.  If you want to catch a wave, go to the beach.  Waste of water, energy, and resources for a private surfing resort.   Noise pollution, traffic jams, and light  pollution.   Destroy the peacefulness of the Coachella Valley. Waste of water, energy, and resources for a private surfing resort.   Noise pollution, traffic jams, and light  pollution.   Destroy the peacefulness of the Coachella Valley. Waste of water, energy, and resources for a private surfing resort.   Noise pollution, traffic jams, and light  pollution.   Destroy the peacefulness of the Coachella Valley. Waste of water, energy, and resources for a private surfing resort.   Noise pollution, traffic jams, and light  pollution.   Destroy the peacefulness of the Coachella Valley.   My major concern is water, in a desert environ that already has water shortages, the gratuitous use of precious  potable water resources for a recreational feature used by a limited group. Altering the master plan to fit a  project rather than designing the project to fit the plan is questionable methodology and while development  has many positives it should fit within the spirit and resources of the  community without detracting from it in  Save & protect aquifer  This is the most bizarre idea. Huge water waste. And dew point, humidity causing disgusting crowded idea. Waste of precious water needed for now and for future generations.  Does not belong in a residential area.  Not  enough infrastructure to accommodate the needs of so many short term visitors and the resulting auto traffic.  Etc, Etc, Etc. 18 million gallons of our DRINKING water!  Lake Mead and the Colorado River are at an all‐time low due to years  of severe drought.  This project is an unconscionable use of this precious resource.  This project exemplifies poor  stewardships of our land and limited water supply. We will be forced to leave La Quinta if this project is approved! So much for “The Gem of the Desert!! La Quinta.   Not needed, tremendous waste of resources 1 It not for the Public. This does NOT benefit La Quinta Residence at all. It's a rich man's playground. Don't use  valuable La Quinta water for other enjoyment. CREATE TOO MUCH TRAFFIC, NOISE, HARDSHIP FOR OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, WASTE OF WATER, NOT FOR  THE PUBLIC TO ENJOY. It will be a waste of valuable water and will increase traffic in the area. Low density residential/golf zoning  would have to be changed. Once that zoning change is made, it will be on the books forever.   I don’t want the zoning to change from low density to allow for the added traffic a resort use will generate. I live very close (a few hundred meters) to the intersection of Madison and 60th.  This development will expose  me to  light, noise, and traffic caused air pollution.  To add to that, development of water‐based recreational  attractions in the midst of a prolonged and worsening drought is unconscionable.  It is also clear evidence of the  improper influence of money in the local governmental zoning process.  What insanity! Please help protect our dwindling precious resources and think beyond immediate‐‐or even intermediate‐‐ revenue generation. Zones are established for logical, protective reasons and we degrade them at our own peril.  A wave pool doesn't make sense for this community at this time.  If ever in the desert.  La Quinta Too much additional traffic, noise, light pollution in a pro dominantly residential neighborhood. Possibly even  decreasing property values We live in Triology, wave pool with lights till 10pm next to a retirement community and the noise it brings along  with traffic is unacceptacle. An alluvial fan to a mountain belongs to its community & wildlife.  Enclosing and gating this for a few new  residents is selfish. I teach water conservation; & throwing big waves of water in the air in the middle of the dry  desert for recreation is quite far from conserving this precious resource. How will students discover and study  Salton Sea’s water line on Coral Mountain if forever handed over to tourists who don’t care for our valley?  Thanks for listening; I love the Coachella Valley where I have grown up and lived  for 50+ years.  I am concerned that the wave park will bring traffic, noise, crime, disturbance to wildlife and use too much  water,  too many short term rentals. How will Coachella residents save every drop of water so this exaggeration would have enough water, energy  and surfers to make this thing work well over time?  No way!!! An expensive boondoggle that will turn into an albatross burden for the citizens of La Quinta.  The project is  expensive, demands an exorbitant amount of electric energy, will waste far too many gallons of evaporated  potable water, and is not designed to have an operable business plan.  Too much, too wasteful, and too  imaginary for all of us in La Quinta.   We do not want all the noise and traffic. Water/drought. Noise/congestion. Vacation rentals    I am very concerned about the water issue. The A\Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival and Stagecoach add incredible traffic to our neighborhood,  having this monstrosity across the street is too much. Venture capitalists raping our beautiful desert for their  own greedy ends. Unfortunately once again Money Wins and Nature Loses  I agree that it is stupid to use our water in such a way. We can't water our lawns or get water in restaurants,  without asking for it. We are very careful not to let the water run from faucets. This kind of thing is  unconscionable! They are already clearing ground for it in Palm Springs! This is terrible! It makes me sick to think  about it.  Too much development.  We don't need yet another new hotel on top of the two at Silverock and even more  homes.    Also, the traffic and noise that would take place.  Having open spaces is still a plus to those who live in  the area and in a quiet environment and why we moved out here. This is not a good fit for the Coachella Valley.  It will waste water and does not does not fit in with our beautiful  desert resources.   Inappropriate use of scarce water resources  I'm a 30‐year resident of CA; 12 years in La Quinta, and 18 years in Palm Desert. As now Professor Emeritus in  Architecture, my career spanned 35 years with 12 years as co‐Chair of the Palm Desert Architecture  Commission, I've studied real estate development proposals of all kinds .during my professional career. I've also  served on elected Planning Boards and Conservation Commissions.    The Wave is an outrageous development  proposal considering the overall California drought. Other concerns, such as; noise pollution, excessive traffic,  and high‐density housing with 600 short‐term rentals should alarm the City of La Quinta.     The City should  outright DENY changing the Residential zoning for this project. This is a foolish idea for the following reasons:  Water usage waste will deplete to the point of declining property  value, climate change will deplete our water resources, poor management by the state to find other sources of  water will further turn the Coachella valley into a blighted area, highway and road infrastructure will not  tolerate the construction traffic. I am a permanent resident and do not want more transient traffic in my  We are in a drought. I have to cut my water usage and remove my lawn, plant desert scape to help my  community. I do not support this water waste! We are in the midst of a drought. We are in the desert. Why in heaven's name would we want to use water so  developers can make money, disrupt lives and screw over over the community where they most likely don't live.      We should not allow this project to go forward. Water waste, our IID power grids are already strained, traffic, zoning, and light pollution. La quinta should  remain a peaceful place for nature to thrive. Drought, the use of drinking water in a desert environment.  Commercial intrusion 24 hours a day in a  residential area.  No more beautiful dark desert skies which was the reason for choosing this area. there is only one Coral Mountain in the world!!!!! beautiful,symbolic!!!  low use residential,  golf course type  property,if even that,   should be the only development ever considered for this specific location(base of coral  mountain)!!!! the surf park development can be built in many many other locations and not have near the  negative impact as it would at the base of coral mountain! I believe that this projet will forever change the dynamics of this area of La Quinta. We live here for the dark  skies, peaceful tranquility and low traffic. Additionally with energy concerns and water consumption will add a  stress to the system and is environmentally detrimental. The added strain on emergency servcies will jeopardize  response times and stretch the Sheriff Dept. thin. I live adjacent to the proposed project and it would greatly and negatively impact my daily life. This kind of  project was never originally proposed by the Andalusia developing partners and is a desperate attempt to regain  their investment at the expense of everyone in the area, including there own Andalusia development. I disagree with this project due to the effect on our community. All the extra people coming in is very  concerning. Why waste our water and expose is to all the different impacts in our quiet community? Does not  make sense, I very much disagree.  I am most concerned about the negative environmental impacts created by this project.  Water and electricity  are scarce now.  This would waste those precious resources. The negative impact on the environment and the wasteful use of scarce resources, specifically water and  electricity, are the main reasons for my concern. The area is residential and should remain as such. This development is inappropriate for the area. I do not  support changing the zoning. With ongoing drought issues a surf/wave park is irresponsible. Basically, it is an inappropriate use of water in the desert. We have been enjoying the beauty and solitude of the Coachella Valley (spring flowers, Living Desert, Indian  Canyons) and surrounding desert (Joshua Tree N.P., Anza Borrego Desert S.P.) via weekend and vacation travel  for many years and decided to relocate to La Quinta when we retired 11 years ago for the things we didn't have  in the city: wonderful weather, minimal traffic, low noise, dark sky, many choices for entertainment and dining  close by, wildlife, hiking, unlimited photographic opportunities, etc., etc. We are highly concerned that building  the proposed resort will have a huge negative impact on all the reasons we moved here in the first place in  addition to throwing away many thousands of gallons of scarce drinking water that we cannot afford to waste  for the entertainment of a wealthy few. We are most definitely 100% against this or any similar project in South  La Quinta and want the City Council to deny rezoning.  I agree with all the reasons mentioned on the Say no to the wave card but most of all we are in a serious  I do not want our drinking water to be exploited. Everyone should have access to drinking water and I do not  believe filling up a wave pool for private surfing is a good use of our resources. La Quinta City Council members please do not approve the wave park.  I believe the noise, environmental issues  and the traffic will cause huge problems for residents of LaQuinta.   Dear La Quinta city council members please do not allow the wave park to destroy our beautiful city.  The  negative impact this park will bring will definitely be greater then any positive impact it would have.   The proposed project would be a waste of our precious water and create a lot of noise pollution.  Also there  seems to be a lot of environmental impacts not are not desired in our community.  Water is a resource that we have to be diligent with  A wave pool /surf park in the Desert in the midst of a long  term drought  is foolish and not necessary  We live in a desert in the state of California. Our drought issue is worsening to the point where the state has  restricted farmers' water usage during a pandemic when food shortages are already an issue.      It is  unreasonable to develop water features knowing that we currently do not have a solution to the worsening  drought issue. Our desert is seeing major increases in population and visitors, leading to greater water  consumption. It is unfair to ask locals, small businesses, and farmers to cut water usage while simultaneously  approving wasteful projects such as this surf pool.       Of all the creative people on this planet, there is no one  who can design an attraction that does not utilize excessive amounts of water?      I find it hard to believe this  surf park will draw in enough people to offset the number of angry residents. New projects should make sense  for the entire community. We are not opposed to fun, new projects, but this project is irresponsible. I talk to  many people within this community, and I have yet to meet someone who is happy or excited about this project.   How can anyone morally or ethically be ok with such a plan while all the taxpaying residents are continually  asked and expected to cut their water and power usage year afteryear.  With our resourses being stretched thin  more and more yearly, and this projects even get passed the 1st stage of request, makes me wonder who we  voted in office to take care of our city.  Very important to consider next voting time. Maybe some members are  being bought out. Not enough ethical people any more these days.  Some of us are a dying breed out here.  How can anyone morally or ethically be ok with such a plan while all the taxpaying residents are continually  asked and expected to cut their water and power usage year afteryear.  With our resourses being stretched thin  more and more yearly, and this projects even get passed the 1st stage of request, makes me wonder who we  voted in office to take care of our city.  Very important to consider next voting time. Maybe some members are  being bought out. Not enough ethical people any more these days.  Some of us are a dying breed out here.  We believe this project is totally unsuitable for the proposed location.  It's environmental impact is disgusting. We believe this project is totally unsuitable for the proposed location.  It's environmental impact is disgusting.  There are so many reasons this is a bad land project:  Out of Townes traffic!  Water waste, California has a  water shortage!!!  Destroying the view of our lovely mountains!  causing  many different types of pollution! My wife and I moved to Trilogy La Quinta 6 years ago from the San Francisco Bay Area seeking peace and quiet  and much less traffic. We fear the Wave Park will change all that regardless of what they say. We are so happy  living here and don't want to move again.  Please do not approve this project. We residents of the valley are constantly told we have a water shortage... that we need to conserve water!  Approving a water park of any kind makes NO sense at all!!! WHY should I cut back on my water usage IF a  water park in La Quinta is approved? Either we residents are being lied to or our La Quinta City Counsil is insane  to approve a business that will use massive amounts of our water. I am opposed to this project.  It would be very irresponsible for the planning commission and City Council to  approve this project.  Surf parks are not a success model and to allow a 13 football field hole to be built next to  our beautiful Coral Mountain is selfish.  We moved to The Quarry from PGA West because we wanted a more  peaceful and natural setting.  You will forever change this area (and we cant go back) if you allow this project to  move forward.   The last thing we need is a surfing resort ‐ water is a valuable commodity. My biggest concern is the waste of scarce water resources ‐ that's just crazy. this does NOT belong here TERRIBLE idea during a megadrought!!! We have been experiencing drought for several years now.  Our water resources are dwindling, now someone is  going to build a humungous surfing resort, that will waste water daily!  We, the residents, have been asked to  conserve water and electricity, while our City Council may give permission to a couple big companies to build a  facility that contradicts our conservation efforts.  And, the light pollution!  What happened to our "starry night"  ordinance?!?  We used to stargaze at the Corral Mountain area.  This project is going to completely destroy the  landscape of our beautiful La Quinta and the nature of our community.  Please deny the request for the zone  change.  Horrible use of precious water for a ridiculous entertainment venue! I don’t believe that you are taking seriously future water shortages.  The Colorado River was just elevated this  week to the most endangered river in the United States.  This is the wrong project in the wrong place.   This project belongs near I‐10, not in housing neighborhoods.  Im opposed to this development for many reasons and legitimate concerns, first there is a drought, this is a  wasteful use of water, especially when some residents can’t pay their water bill or have no water stall.  Second,  the lights that will be used to will negatively effects the wildlife in the area, not to mention the residents.  The  stars can be seen at night, it won’t be the case when there are so many lights.  The house disturbance to our  wildlife and our residents.  The traffic it will bring is horrendous.  We are fighting climate change and here the  city goes and destroys any chance.  Shame on you. I am a home owner in Trilogy.  My husband and I also built a home several years ago in Minnesota on a 140 acre  man‐made lake.  As one of the first residents, we moved in while the lake was still being created.  Its  incomprehensible to me that anyone would suggest there will be no problem with noise and traffic as we  witnessed it firsthand.  The large equipment needed and the construction workers traveling in and out. Not to  mention all the people in the short term rentals and hotel and the noise from the surf pool once up and running.    And to think this project will continue building out for over 20 years! My husband has been in real estate for 40  years.  There is no way that the value of homes in Trilogy and surrounding area will not be negatively impacted.   How do you think would be buyers will react when they see all the traffic and construction  and are told it will  be going on for over 20 years?? Haven't communities throughout the valley, including La Quinta, been  concerned with short term rentals and now you want to approve an additional 600?  The entire state of  California is suffering through another drought and we are being asked to conserve  water and you are going to  approve this surf park? I would urge members of the council to consider all these arguments as well as others  that have been presented, and vote no on this project. Ecology. This is the desert. Go to the beach to surf.  Water is precious and this a huge waste of drinking water.  We live just off of 58th street near the proposed wave park. I am very concerned about the noise, traffic and  general congestion in our quiet area. I feel that this would bring down the value of our homes in this area.  Please do not approve this travesty! We are experiencing global climate change. The Colorado river cannot sustain use forever. In the midst of a  drought, it is foolish to consider a wave park with high density traffic. I am a voting resident of La Quinta. Deny Coral Mountain Resort rezoning and apologize to the citizens of this  lovely community for even considering turning our present and future sources of drinking water into an  immensely gross corporate folly, increasing traffic, creating greenhouse gases and more light pollution, setting  the stage for future power outages, and decaying the natural peace and beauty of OUR community of private  citizen. We don't need the tax dollars, if that is your excuse for considering this ridiculously short sighted  political notion. Thank you, JamesG.   La Quinta will not change for the better with this private resort.  Traffic and noise will increase, water will be  wasted, it will require significant energy resources.  This will change the tranquil nature of La Quinta, a feature  which drew me to the city. This is not an area for water themed activities. Leave that for Florida!  Water will be an increasingly precious  resource.  Send it to the Salton Sea I am a resident adjacent to 58/Madison.  Keep zoning SFR!!!!! Save our water!!!! This will destroy our valley.  We are in a drought so why would this project even be considered?   The Wave is inappropriate in La Quinta. I think the Imperial Irrigation District calculations of water usage must  be based on the Wave in Lemoore which is situated out in wide open farmlands. Its website states "The hot  season lasts for 3.6 months, from June 3 to September 23, with an average daily high temperature above 89°F.  The hottest month of the year in Lemoore is July, with an average high of 98°F and low of 65°F." Not exactly like  us, would you say? And the Wave certainly does not belong in a quiet very high end residential area. I also  believe the Board and Planning Commission could be exposed to legal backlash costing the City and thereby its  residents unnecessary costs. Do you live near here? Probably not. Please be against the Wave ‐ vote with your  conscience, not your politics.  Thank you.                                                               I did not move to the La Quinta a quiet and tranquil residential area,  with dark skies, stop signs and minimal  traffic as I approach retirement to find out the city wants to rezone a residential area to a recreational one. I  don't oppose development, I oppose the irresponsibility in the approval of the proposed plans for The Coral  Mountain Resort and The Wave Park.  I understand you want the TOT revenue in the future ‐ but this is the  wrong location to change the zoning.  If passed the negative impact on the environment it will never be  reversed. We are in a severe drought with no end insight! There's a news report from April 18, 2022 on Channel  12 in Arizona ‐ Titled "Page, AZ facing major challenges as water levels at Lake Powell drop" ‐ States "shrinking  lake levels are threatening the tourist town's drinking water". ‐ Is this what you want to happen in our  community if City Council moves forward with this project!  Increase in traffic, fire/police resources will be  impacted in addition to noise level from "The Wave" machinery.  This past weekend was my first experience  with the first "Coachella Festival" ‐ I experienced first hand the noise/vibrations from the base music from the  band well after midnight on Sunday evening which kept me awake, (I had to go to work the next morning and I  was not at my best with minimal sleep.)  I don't want to experience this from the machinery for "The Wave" on  a nightly basis.  Please do not pass the zoning or the plans for The Wave at Coral Mountain.  We love this area due to the LACK of commercial activity, night light pollution, traffic congestion, and noise in  general.  This was and is the appeal of this area.  The many residents who willingly pay property taxes and care  about this community are not in favor of this significant change.  Please carefully reconsider agreeing to an  unknown and undesired project especially as inflation and concerns over water loom. All the reasons listed on the postcard It is irresponsible to use water resources when we are facing a drought. In addition, it disrupts our quiet,  tranquil environment and displaces wildlife. It is irresponsible to use water resources when we are facing a drought. In addition, it disrupts our quiet,  tranquil environment and displaces wildlife. I am concerned for all the reasons listed on the postcard  I moved to Trilogy LQ to enjoy the quiet serene setting, the lack of traffic and street noise.  The night skies here  are beautiful and I am against the resort and wave pool going in to the area.  The zoning should remain  residential to be more in line with the surrounding community.      Our water is a Precious Resource...  Take this project closer to a lake or an ocean, not the middle of our desert!  I  don't care how many golf courses are here, there are here, we don't have to add to the madness. Our water is a Precious Resource...  Take this project closer to a lake or an ocean, not the middle of our desert!  I  don't care how many golf courses are here, there are here, we don't have to add to the madness. We don't need MORE Private resorts or anything that ALL CV residents can't participate in. La Quinta is a quiet, peaceful community.  We respectfully ask to remain a community that cares about people  instead of money. Also, water is a definite issue. water shortage, Colorado River can not support wasteful usuage. I oppose the proposal because of the light and noise pollution especially.  Also, communities all over California  are opposing  short term rentals due to the traffic and congestion it causes, not to mention nuisance complaints  with more people in the area that are not neighborhood oriented. Why diminish the quietude and serenity of the local community. Politicians will probably vote in favor for the  tax revenues this would generate and for whatever they can put in their pockets under the table from the  We have a nice residential community with more than enough hustle and bustle on the Hwy 111 corridor. The  last thing we need is to spread this congestion and noise to another site off the corridor. We are in a drought, and even if we were not, this is an irresponsible use of water.  There is already one of these  parks approved in Coachella Valley, why should there be another?  Increased water use, noise, traffic, and light  in the neighborhood are all reasons to NOT approve this plan. Where would the water come from?   I thought the entire southwest was in a drought and all of us are expected  to conserve water, so how does this fit in? Approving this project would go against the wishes of the majority of homeowners that would be adversely  affected.  Do what you were elected to do and look out for our interests. Vote no. This is a squandering of  precious water, electricity along with the quiet enjoyment of our properties. La Quinta is an area where full time residential families, professionals, and retirees have moved to stay out of  the hub‐bub, and "scene" of the western parts of the valley.  The recent development out here as already  drastically changed the full time residents (such as myself) quality of life.  We pay our taxes and keep our  properties updated and well‐maintained, we participate civicly, we have pride in our La Quinta Community that  is already suffering all season long from the concerts, tennis, and ongoing events.  This isn't SOLEY A RESORT  TOWN...PEOPLE LIVE HERE!  HAVE SOME RESPECT and don't put yet ANOTHER rental resort with the waterpark  eyesore in our community!  It's ENOUGH! This is not something that is needed or wanted in La Quinta.  It uses our natural resources and increases all the  “bad stuff” that isn’t needed in our community.  SAY NO TO THE WAVE!!! I am whole heartily against every aspect regarding this proposed change in zoning, and everything about this  project due to excess water usage, traffic, noise, light and transient usage. Moved to this southern part of La Quinta, due to less commercial lighting, so I can  use my telescope and study  the stars and their galaxies!   Please don’t ruin the sky with all the planned lighting in this development.  I will be moving into Andalusia in two years when my house is finished being built.  I chose Andalusia for its  peaceful location as my place to retire.  Having experienced Coachella concerts this year for the first time, I do  not want that traffic, noise, crowds etc. non‐stop year round.  I also am concerned about the massive use of  water in the desert.  All of us need to conserve and this is definitely not conservation. Traffic impact, water waste, and creating a new inconsistent lifestyle for La Quinta A water park during an extreme drought is the last thing we need.  Between the traffic and light pollution this  will create a toll on the Desert environment.  To bring that much traffic into an area where the residents  purchased high end homes for the quiet, peaceful   environment  that this type of resort will destroy. Also extreme use of water that is in short supply due to  drought conditions is not a smart move for any community.  We voted our City Council members into office to  look out for our best interests and hope they will reject this project as that is what IS in best for us. Thank you We will be directly affected by this project as backyard faces across Madison to the site.  We will be affected by  lighting and noise pollution  Please do not allow the building of this "white elephant" We will be directly affected by this project as backyard faces across Madison to the site.  We will be affected by  lighting and noise pollution  Please do not allow the building of this "white elephant" We will be directly affected by this project as backyard faces across Madison to the site.  We will be affected by  lighting and noise pollution  Please do not allow the building of this "white elephant" Please have the council read your mailer, I agree with all of the negative impacts to our community, city and  environment. I cant formulate one positive outcome except for more revenue and greed, if that's the deciding  factor to approve this project, than the city council needs to be recalled. I agree with every statement on your opposition card.  Noise, light pollution, traffic, inappropriate for the  community.   Concerned about traffic and noise pollution This type of commercialism is a water wasting project and will bring in crowds that we don’t want in the  LaQuinta community.  La Quinta is part of the desert region which is under drought conditions. Why use up water in such a huge  wasteful manner?  And during summer months there are already electricity shortages and outages.  La quinta  city council needs to remember who they represent and maintain the beautiful, peaceful, relaxing city and area  in which people chose to live . Overall traffic in the whole valley has gotten too congested from over development. We do not want this to  become another Orange county. However, the main factors for me are water and power. The Western US is in a  mega drought which damages farming  and power production at the dams. We need water to grow food for  farming. Our valley's precious water and power should not be wasted and potentially put at risk. We should not  max out our power grid or resources so that we have a cushion when there are problems. It is not a matter of  "if" but "when" with water and power problems. Living in the desert in the summer, this could potentially be life  threatening. The drought in California continues to get worse and there's no reason to believe it will improve in the future.  Climate change is real and we shouldn't waste our precious water. Please don't build this project! This wave pool is completely ridiculous the amount of water & electricity that will be used taking from residents  upping prices , the drought that’s so “bad” taking 18 million gallons is disgusting the only reason this would be  approved is corruption in those that govern us. Outrageous nobody wants this horrible wave pool  The points made in the opposition publication covers most of my concerns. I bought in LaQuinta to live in a  peaceful well maintained city. We are in a water shortage with no end in sight.  We have to watch our water useag. Let the desert be desert.   Go surfing where the real waves are.  1) wasting water!  2) locals are not the customer and don't benefit. Instead they pay the price of, water  consumption, scenic obstruction, noise pollution, TRAFFIC JAMS, and destroying the peaceful and untouched  desert.    Contact me if I can help; Brad Davis ph: 512‐745‐0461 With 5 developments in progress, the wave park adds additional strain to our infrastructure and precious  resources. Filling a 16.7 acre water basin for water sports in the middle of the desert is ludicrous. Not to  mention noise and additional traffic congestion will add to an already strained infrastructure. If generating  revenue is primary focus from STRs, then it’s wiser to reassess existing communities and provide them  That water park will NOT do any value for this community,    It sounds like the young men that graduated from  colllege with a degree and NO common sense We moved here for the peace and quite. Plus no traffic problems and dark night skies.     If the builders want  something like this, put it by the new hockey stadium off I‐10 and Cook St. To much traffic, will destroy the beauty of the mountains, waste of water the ocean is two hours away doesn’t  This is not the time during a drought for a surf resort in a already small desert resort community.  Adding to  pollution, traffic and overcrowded communities.  No short term rentals either.   Water Shortage! Drought! It’s crazy they ask us to watch our water usage but let them build the Wave? Beach is  2 hours away. It’s truly Crazy!!!!! My main concerns are water consumption, traffic, noise and light pollution. The only positive I see is tax  revenue and the quality of life clearly outways that.  My main concerns are water consumption, traffic, noise and light pollution. The only positive I see is tax  revenue and the quality of life clearly outways that.  I just seems that greed has overtaken every aspect of life these days and this is such a self centered project that  I find it hard to believe that city council is even looking at it. Families are finding it hard to live and buy here as it  is and I gather our school registration is down because of that and other factors. We love living in a multi level  family area and I think we have enough outside Festivals and money making functions to keep the coffers full.  This could turn out to be another white elephant in our lovely area! Never mind the environmental impact. The  light pollution alone would be catastrophic! And water use ???? Please send these folks to Arizona or elsewhere  where no doubt they will be welcomed with open arms. Thanks for your consideration 🙏 I just seems that greed has overtaken every aspect of life these days and this is such a self centered project that  I find it hard to believe that city council is even looking at it. Families are finding it hard to live and buy here as it  is and I gather our school registration is down because of that and other factors. We love living in a multi level  family area and I think we have enough outside Festivals and money making functions to keep the coffers full.  This could turn out to be another white elephant in our lovely area! Never mind the environmental impact. The  light pollution alone would be catastrophic! And water use ???? Please send these folks to Arizona or elsewhere  where no doubt they will be welcomed with open arms. Thanks for your consideration 🙏 This is an inappropriate area for such a Resort Development. It should be out by Route 10, visible from the  Freeway, not hidden out by 60th street ‐ when it fails financially we will be looking at the abandoned park  forever,  this is not smart. California is in a drought ‐ it does not make sense to add a wave park in this location because there is limited  water for drinking and other common water uses. It does not make sense to add a wave park when we might  not have enough water to drink, shower, or flush the toilet.  We should not take zone changes lightly. The existing zoning for this property was put in place for a reason. That  reason has not changed. I believe in property rights, but I also believe in adhering to current zoning. Not an approximate fit for a community of homes, retirement communities and agriculture. Heck, we don’t  even have retail. Our closest grocery is 10 minutes away. Why would we need a surf park?  It would be nuts to  rezone for something like that.  Environmentally very bad; horrible for the residents because of bright light, noise and traffic; an example of  damage to the many for the benefit of a few. Not right for our area. High water usage is built into this project! (ie. Excess Evaporation due to High air Temperatures and large  surface area of the wave pools). No justification by developer saying “Golf Courses do too”. OK, but most of that  Golf Courwater flows back into the Aquifier. A claim the Wave‐pool can’t make. I moved to Quinta 5 years ago to enjoy a beautiful, quiet retirement. I have seen this quiet community become  busier with  each passing year. La Quinta already has a good amount of events and attractions that bring in the  revenue needed to keep our city a wonderful place to live.  Please do not let private, for‐profit entities take  advantage of our beautiful, quiet place by invading La Quinta in order to plump up their bank accounts  when  they have absolutely no regard for our serious drought. That problem  should be uppermost in everyone’s mind.  (My neighbor received a threatening letter from the water department for hosing her sidewalk!  And she said  her record for water usage is rated “Excellent”.)    This project, besides the traffic, noise and lights, about which  many residents are concerned, will require an enormous amount of water taken from our already scarce supply.      I cannot understand how any City Council member could, with a clear conscience, approve any area in our city  or valley for re‐zoning to accommodate a project that will so grossly deplete our precious water resources.   Please do not vote to rezone the area to allow this project to adversely affect the residents of our great City of  Water is limited and already impacted by multiple golf courses, hotels, and gated communities with boating  waterways. It is arrogant and disrespectful to endlessly pump the aquifer to amuse the rich at the expense of  already established residents. I am concerned about the impact overall to our community and the irresponsibility relative to our water and  natural beauty.  Drought! Traffic! Light pollition! Stvr!  Do not approve this, this is not the place nor time. It is wrong to have to change the zoning to satisfy a development. The noise pollution and additional traffic will  destroy our very peaceful area. Too much water, ruin the neighborhood with traffic and light up the sky and noise. This borders on a criminal use of water at a time of water shortages and the climate emergency.  I'm also  concerned about the STVR impact on La Quinta. This will add huge traffic, noise and congestion problems to our city. It is totally wrong for La Quinta.  Water usage. We conserve but new resort won’t. Peaceful nature of our desert will be lost  This is an absolute, ridiculous use of scarce resources, especially during a mega drought. There is no way to  justify this project ‐ I don't care how much money it supposedly will bring in. We have enough development as‐ I typed all of my reasons, your system did not take Increased traffic, noise, crowds, wasted water, light pollution, and electricity usage. I live at 60th and Madison, do you know what this will do to my home value and traffic problems, plus do we  really need more hotels and housing , We are so over on construction in adding houses on 50th, 49th, 48th and  47th!!  I am so against these projects. It is not the same when I moved here 161/2 years ago, thank you  Under the best conditions our desert climate is hot and dry. Climate change is causing severe drought and  excessive heat and we can't afford to waste water. The state of California has already implemented water  restrictions. Building an exclusive surfing park that only benefits a few but has a negative  impact on everyone  isn't responsible government. Secondly, building in a residential area is also irresponsible. The noise, lights and  traffic again will benefit the members but negatively impact everyone in the surrounding neighborhoods. Please  Concerned about increased traffic, noise, crowds at limited grocery shopping in the area, light pollution, water  usage and electricity usage. This is definitely a bad location and will affect our area forever and is not what we bought into. With water  shortages in California now a bad time. I love living in La Quinta. I enjoy the peace and quiet living in Trilogy. No noise, no lights no traffic. Let's keep  that land for residential living! I Vote "No" to the City of La Quinta for the rezoning of the proposal for Coral Mountain Resort by Meriwether  Companies and Big Sky Wave Development.    During the music festivals held in the City of Indio, it is already  impossible to go in and out of La Quinta on our regular roads of travel because of the road blocks due to the  festivals. Adding more resort events of any kind would cause more traffic and travel problems.    Our water and  electricity is already stretched to the limit. it is absurd that the City of La Quinta would even consider another  resort at this time.  Especially one that would use a TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF OUR PRECIOUS WATER AND  ELECTRICITY! The City of La Quinta has already requested that the homeowners conserve water and electricity.  To add this resort would be hypocritical on the part of the City.  Our cost for water and electricity has already  increased and this resort would cause a further increase. There is no justification what‐so‐ever for the City of La  Quinta to approve this rezoning and resort.    With the hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants entering our  country over the past year, crime will go up at our expense, our taxes will go up to support subsidy of assistance  for these illegals, and to foot the bill for the crimes committed.    The City of La Quinta should NEVER even  consider approving this project due to the hardships we are already under with the impositions, mandates, and  increased costs. We should NEVER have to pay for these problems as homeowners and citizens.    This kind of  project should be located far away from any cities; somewhere like the Salton Sea that has "free" water and lots  of open land area.    MY VOTE IS "NO".     It will increase greenhouse gas, noise and light pollution  The project is irresponsible in an era of climate change and drought. We don’t need or want this type of  disruptive development.   Lots of seniors in this community city council members should not think on  being greedy and not think  about  the well being of their people, we already have so many venues where city of la quinta is benefiting like  coachella  fest , tennis events etc, greed is not the solution. Thank u very kindly for taking my concern. Lots of seniors in this community city council member should not think on  being greedy and not think the well  being of their people, we already have so many venues where city of la quinta is benefiting like coachella  fest ,  tennis events etc, greed is not the solution. Thank u very kindly for taking my concern. I am requesting that the City of La Quinta deny the zoning change proposal for Coral Mountain Resort by  Meriwether Companies and Big Sky Wave Development.    As it is now, during the music concerts which are not  even held in La Quinta, it is impossible to travel in and out of La Quinta using the normal roads we use because  they are blocked off. Adding more resort events would cause even more traffic and travel problems.    This  proposed resort would cause problems for our survival due to their usage of water and electricity.  Costs for our  water and electricity have already increased, not to mention the City of La Quinta has requested that we as  homeowners conserve our usage of water and electricity.  So there is no justification what‐so‐ever to approve a  rezoning and resort that would use a tremendous amount of water and electricity.    With the inflex of seven  hundred thousand illegal immigrants crossing the United States boarders over the past year, our taxes will  increase because of subsidy assistance for these illegal immigrants as well as defunding the police at the same  time. Crimes will increase and we as homeowners and citizens will foot the bill for these crimes.    How could  the City of La Quinta ever consider this rezoning and resort development? Impositions and mandates already  placed on us at this time are posing significant hardships and problems for us as homeowners.    Coral Mountain  Resort would be a private surfing resort. We should not have to put up with the inconveniences, problems, and  costs that will arise from a private project being imposed on us. I would recommend that Coral Mountain Resort  locate their surf resort to the Salton Sea, lots of "free" water and lots of land area, away from the City of La  Quinta.    My Vote is "NO".    P.S  Arizona is looking better every day!     I am actually surprised this project has gone this far.  We have had a home here for 20 years and this is definitely  NOT a project I would think would fit the area.  This will reduce property values and it is too much building.   Projects need to be slowed down and completed before another project starts.  We don't even have the  Silverrock Project completed yet or ALL the new housing going in across the street from this project at  Andalusia.  Not to mention this is not a project that fits with the lifestyle of the majority of La Quinta residents.   Please stop this project from being approved! We purchased this home with the idea that we were in a quiet, residential neighborhood, surrounded by the  mountains and nature.  The proposed facility would disrupt nature, people, traffic....all for the benefit of a few.   Such a facility should be located off a major thoroughfare and in a commercially zoned area where individuals'  homes and lives aren't disrupted. Please do not ruin the night sky with light pollution!! Fully oppose the project. I did donate to the go fund me. And Fully oppose the project. I did donate to the go fund me. And We are in a drought, how dare you approve this water waste while the state is requesting  to conserve!  Adding  to noise and light pollution!! Bad use of water in a desert area, prone to drought, excessive traffic, not a smart use of the beautiful natural  landscape in this area, light pollution. We love La Quinta for it’s beautiful, natural, calm environment. While we  don’t need another golf course, the private wave park doesn’t fit well in our community. I strongly oppose the  wave park.  La Quinta ‐ I am concerned about the noise, crowds and traffic (especially upon seeing what  Coachella/Stagecoach brings).  My wife and I come to the desert for rest and relaxation, to play golf and enjoy the outdoors.  Although we live  in north La Quinta and would not be directly impacted with local traffic and noise it is a huge step in the wrong  direction for the community.  It would open the door to similar developments in the future if zoning is changed  and sets a bad precedent.    We strongly urge a NO vote on this project and encourage the city council to uphold  the current residential zoning. We need to be conserving water. How can they ask us to conserve when the City approved this.   Will disturb  the beauty and serenity of our communities with noise and light pollution.   This wave pool resort project is wholly inconsistent with the City's general plan, as well as the aesthetics of the  surrounding areas.  South La Quinta is a quiet part of the Coachella Valley, and this project would create noise  and visual impacts that can never be fixed.  Plus the waste of precious fresh water would imperil the rest of the  community's access to water at a reasonable cost.  This is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong  time.  The City Council should not change our community standards for any project, much less an ill‐conceived  wave pool for the ultra‐wealthy. There is an ongoing drought in California and we can’t afford the huge use of water to go to a project like this!   La Quinta ‐ The sound and light from this project will be detrimental to our home values. It would be incredibly irresponsible and egregious for the city of La Quinta to approve the Coral Mountain  Resort.  To allow the wasteful use of our precious water supply for this project would be incredulous considering  the dire drought concerns we have locally and nationally.  With the current water shortage facing our world this  project is incomprehensible to a responsible community.  The Colorado River is experiencing a 20% loss of water  and immediate  need for conservation and our community is entertaining the approval of an irresponsible use of  this previous resource.  How can our community take water conservation seriously if you approve this project?  Clearly the future holds higher water costs for all of us with this project.  Water responsibility is of utmost  concern but then added lighting, traffic, and noise are added detractors.  And finally, 600 short term rentals  appealing to a much younger audience.  While management may oversee aspects of the rentals, police services  will clearly be impacted.  These parks are typically in rural areas not near other home developments and  communities to alleviate noise and light concerns.    A similar wave park in Texas was abandoned three years  ago and is sitting unused.    I suggest the city think long and hard about this decision.  They are sending a  message to the entire community and to generations that are counting on responsible use and conservation of  It's a waste of water when we are being asked to restrict our usage and it's the congestion will be  very  I don't think this is the time to waste potable water on the wave park.  Save the water! Wasteful use of our valuable water and lighting the sky at night. Also traffic and noise. waste of valuable water and lighting the night sky. Destroy the peaceful Nature , and water consumption, climate impact  There will be to many People we already have to deal with cochella event. too much water usage, too many lights, noise.  We are in a drought situation and you want to approve this.   That's not smart.  Vote NO to this. 600 short term rentals and 150 hotel rooms will bring way to much traffic to our quirt neighborhood ‐ this is not  the place for a development like this so please do not change the zoning. Way to many short term rentals ‐ this project will destroy our quiet and peaceful neighborhood   Concerned about traffic and noise pollution Desert Wave Park drought I think that says it all Everything in this website I agree with....makes no sense to use water in this way Our City Council needs to protect our water and environment and not sell out to greed. I get tired of hearing we  have to give up environmental protection for tourist bucks. If we do not protect our city we will need to vote in  a City Council that will! excessive water waste, traffic, noise, lighting, and destruction of nature! We have a water crisis and this is an irresponsible project for a select few.   the water usage and light and noise pollution  My overall concern is about water. The project is not in the best interest of all La Quinta residents by the fact it  is intended for private use. The planned wave pool is an irresponsible use of water when we are in a perpetual  state of drought. My overall concern is about water. The project is not in the best interest of all La Quinta residents by the fact it  is intended for private use. The planned wave pool is an irresponsible use of water when we are in a perpetual  state of drought. save the water. stop the traffic La Quinta  A waste of water. Light, noise, air pollution. Traffic and crowd problems. It is wrong oil so many ways. NO TO THE WAVE!!!!  It will WASTE SCARCE DESERT WATER & ELECTRICITY for a PRIVATE  SURFING RESORT!!   DAMAGE LOCAL RESOURCES!!  OBSTRUCT SCENIC VIEWS!!  CREATE NOISE POLLUTION, LIGHT POLLUTION &  TRAFFIC JAMS!!  INCREASE GREENHOUSE GASES & CLIMATE IMPACTS!!  INCREASE LARGE, OVERCROWDED  SPECIAL EVENTS & THEIR PROBLEMS!!  DESTROY THE PEACEFUL NATURE OF AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY!!  DON'T  LET THEM DESTROY OUR BEAUTIFUL LA QUINTA!!!!  NO TO THE WAVE!!!!!! NO TO THE WAVE!!!!  It will WASTE SCARCE DESERT WATER & ELECTRICITY for a PRIVATE  SURFING RESORT!!   DAMAGE LOCAL RESOURCES!!  OBSTRUCT SCENIC VIEWS!!  CREATE NOISE POLLUTION, LIGHT POLLUTION &  TRAFFIC JAMS!!  INCREASE GREENHOUSE GASES & CLIMATE IMPACTS!!  INCREASE LARGE, OVERCROWDED  SPECIAL EVENTS & THEIR PROBLEMS!!  DESTROY THE PEACEFUL NATURE OF AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY!!  DON'T  LET THEM DESTROY OUR BEAUTIFUL LA QUINTA!!!!  NO TO THE WAVE!!!!!! NO TO THE WAVE!!!!  It will WASTE SCARCE DESERT WATER & ELECTRICITY for a PRIVATE  SURFING RESORT!!   DAMAGE LOCAL RESOURCES!!  OBSTRUCT SCENIC VIEWS!!  CREATE NOISE POLLUTION, LIGHT POLLUTION &  TRAFFIC JAMS!!  INCREASE GREENHOUSE GASES & CLIMATE IMPACTS!!  INCREASE LARGE, OVERCROWDED  SPECIAL EVENTS & THEIR PROBLEMS!!  DESTROY THE PEACEFUL NATURE OF AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY!!  DON'T  LET THEM DESTROY OUR BEAUTIFUL LA QUINTA!!!!  NO TO THE WAVE!!!!!! We bought our home for the quiet and no light pollution experience of our community.  We already have  increased traffic and noise with Coachella, Stage Coach and other events.  Our community does not need a year‐ round tourist attraction that would jeopardize the peaceful nature of our community and resources.  This  sounds like a great fit for Las Vegas. Destruction of nature and waste of utilities/resources .  Changed natural environment  All one has to do is be in La Quinta during the Coachella festival to understand why building this facility would be  a bad idea. It should not be about making the City of La Quinta money, but rather why people will drive farther  to get the serenity that this city provides. California has a lot of beaches, we don't need more. If people want  the tourist and the craziness brought on by these amusement parks, they would move to Anaheim and live near  Disneyland and Knott's Berry farm. But this project is not for the good of the people of La Quinta, it is for the  developers that want to get wealth. Money is not everything, but peace in life is everything. Are you kidding me? A gigantic water feature in the desert of southern California where we have had multiple  drought years. This project will also likely require large amounts of electricity in an area and state that is already  prone to blackouts due to strain on the electrical grid system. Not to mention additional noise pollution and  increased traffic. None of these are desirable illness. I vote a resounding NO on this project. We DO NOT support the change in zoning to Tourist/Commercial/Residential/Open Recreation to allow for:    ‐ The wave/surf pool with its enormous water usage and noise  ‐24 hour access to the resort  ‐Operational hours  of 7 AM ‐ 10 PM 365 days per year  ‐Up to 600 STVRs ‐ 600 residences (with multiple rooms available) plus a 150  room hotel, with no minimum stay required  ‐Could be in excess of 4000 overnight guests  ‐17  “80 foot tall”  light towers illuminating the 16.7 acre wave/surf pool  ‐Hotel, bars, retail and other "sporting venues"  ‐The  increased population density with the Project hosting residents and transients alike which will increase traffic  I believe it will change what la Quinta stands for !!!! The water and electricity usage are a concern, especially the water. The traffic is my next concern due to the  size and scope of the facility and the year round nature of their service.  La Quinta light and noise pollution, traffic, environmental I am not willing to sacrifice local water and resources (in the middle of a drought, mind you) so a private  company can turn a profit The Coachella Valley attracted us, as it has many for decades, because of its desert beauty. This area is balancing  the tension of economic development against real and finite natural resources, key being WATER and energy.  Developments that are managed with current environmental science as guides can allow this valley to grow and  prosper responsibly. This proposed project is not based on current environmental science nor responsible  growth policies other communities have in place. This is a good opportunity for the council to set strong  boundaries for the future. If our water and environment are negatively impacted, the long term negative affects  will far outweigh the short‐term positive infusion of investments a project of this scope may bring.  I have lived here 54 years. Heat causes water to evaporate causing MORE higher dew point along with the  huminty.    This is will ruin the peaceful atmosphere of our community and we do not want Disneyland in La  Quinta. Our water need to  go back into our ground as when we had agriculture. Golf courses are much better.  No the Kennedys would not approve this on their land.    IT MUST BE STOPPED. IMMEDIATELY Thank you for listening! As we are in a drought in a desert, this project seems like a very poor use of water  resources.  The most salient reason is the mismanagement of our water resource.  Not a good use of our water resources, and the replenishment due to evaporation. Traffic and too many people coming from all over. Traffic and too many people coming from all over. WRONG PLACE,  WRONG TIME, TOTAL WASTE OF WATER FOR SO FEW What a huge waste of water. This will not last, this wave project is short term fad, not long term, no staying  power.  It will not last, then what?  The city will have a big mess to deal with, ton and tons of concrete.  Plus this  will be the fourth water project the the desert,  (Desert Willow's surf park, Disney's lake in Rancho Mirage and  the Wet'n Wild / Surf Park in Palm Springs.  Where will all the water come from?  We have been in a drought for  This is almost as silly as a soup sandwich.   The ocean is 2 hours away. Lots of water and no electricity needed.  We just recently purchased a new home in La Quinta and relocated from Los Angeles County to get away from  the dense population and commercial aspects of the city.  We already have major concerns being so close to the  music festivals and all the events.  The noise levels created and vibration in our complex was a shocker.  Adding  more traffic and using vital resources from our area is concerning.  We moved here for the tranquility and  peacefulness the region brings.  Bringing in a private wave park for recreation of very few and profit to the  owners at all of our expense is unacceptable and irresponsible.  The landscape around us should be utilized for  something more suitable to our community.  Thank you!     This is actually devastating to fully comprehend. The impact it will have environmentally and to our beautiful  community is unconscionable. How could a responsible city government allow this? Why would you take part in  the destruction of our views, wildlife, and lifestyle? Do the right thing. Keep La Quinta "The Gem Of the Desert".  Concerned about water being wasted when it is already dangerously low. We already give up our city for four weeks each year now to Coachella and do not need another circus and the  waste of our already extremely limited resources particularly water. This project makes no sense whatsoever. Wasting water ‐ damage to local resources ‐ obstruction of scenic  views ‐ increasing greenhouse gases ‐ the problems associated with overcrowded special events ‐ destruction of  the quite enjoyment in our residential neighborhoods. Please vote against this project. During a period of increasinly severe drought & global warming is NO time to be using precious water and  electricity for this recreational purpose.   We live in Trilogy.  We bought here in 2006 to be away from congestion and have a beautiful landscape and  desert area to live.   We are very concerned also about additional water usage in our state.  Wave Pool????   Really!!!!!????? Water waste, light pollution, STR  We have enough influx of tourists with snowbirds and Coachella and Stagecoach. To add another tourism spot  outside of our normal tourist months would take away what little privacy to our homes we have. As residents,  we're already fed up with the people that Stagecoach and Coachella bring and we can barely keep up in  businesses in both La Quinta and neighboring cities. To add a water park that would drain our resources, make it  even more expensive to live here and cause light pollution would decrease not only the value of our homes but  our lifestyle and peace. We are entitled to our peace and quiet. I'm 30 years old and I greatly oppose the  building of any type of theme park in the area. Not just for water shortage, but because of the people that  would come and change our existing way of life. There's enough change throughout the year without adding  For all the reasons listed on the flyer ‐ it's just a bad idea for this beautiful location!!! I echo the sentiments of the reasons as stated "say no to the wave" efforts The water necessary to fill and maintain the proper levels and lost/wasted to evaporation will be enormous.   Plus, I cannot foresee heavy usage when air temperatures are in the 100‐120 degree range.  After all, we do live  in a desert and must respect the safety of our residents and guests.  In addition, CVWD is already requesting  cutbacks in water usage both for drinking (restaurants) and landscapes.      All people should be able to enjoy the water park.  Adding a large body of water with significant wasteful evaporation concerns along with the lighting and noise  pollution from this project will generate  It over whelm our community, poor use of water,  increase traffic Crowds noise light and air pollution poor example to set in a drought with climate change too Fresh drinking water is a precious commodity.  We live in a desert with a unique and fragile ecosystem. We are  in a drought that shows no sign of ending.  We have a limited and slightly renewable water source that cannot  possibly keep up with our growing population that increases exponentially every year.   If we are to import for a  large body of water it should be to save the purity of our air by replenishing the Salton Sea.  Surfing is for the  ocean not the desert for a privileged few at the expense of everything that makes our city special. We do not need more traffic in La Quinta  We do not need to use more water for a purpose that does not  benefit our residents  Cochella is bad enough for us all and we do not need more people from out of town  We  are supposed to be a quite peaceful neighborhood. and the big monet is taking advantage of our way of life  NO  TO THE WATER WAVE PARK California is in an epic draught. Allowing a project that will consume a huge amount of water is irresponsible. 80  foot light towers will ruin dark sky. The size, scope and proposed special events will bring larger numbers of  people and vehicles. Noise and traffic will be a nuisance to currently quiet residential neighborhoods. Quiet  enjoyment and safety of existing properties will be compromised.  Project will forever mar the natural beauty of Coral Mountain, waste  precious water resources, hinder property  values, increase traffic, congestion, and pollution, and further impair the cultural image of La Quinta.  La Quinta  is not Disneyland, get a clue folks.  There are multitudes of negative impacts that would result if this resort, vacation rentals, and enormous wave  pool project goes forward: It would forever change and destroy, dishonor and make inaccessible a revered  stunning visual and natural historic setting that's endured proudly for thousands of years, adjacent to the Santa  Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument.  In light of today's water scarcity, this an obscene waste of  precious water.  Noise pollution, light pollution, air pollution in an area and community that's long been  cherished for its peaceful, natural setting and dark skies. Increased traffic.  People, flora and fauna will suffer.  This is not the right location for this project. Surely, there is another location that would be a better fit and not  pose this level of valid, serious, critical concerns.   HUGE WASTE OF WATER, increased traffic, increased noise In a desert, in yet another drought, amid global warming, this project is an example of the kind dangerous hubris  that will have disastrous consequences. The profit of wealthy people and corporations, or the entertainment of  a tiny portion of our population should not supersede the needs of the people and larger ecology of this valley.  That’s not how democracy is supposed to work. That’s not how responsible leadership is supposed to work.  For all the reasons you stated, it's hard to imagine the City Council members would vote to approve.   The wrong place for such a facility. I'm amazed that anyone would consider wasting the water and electricity on this project. We are in a desert and  we are in a drought. The environmental impact of this disastrous monstrosity would be horrifying.  Approval has already been given for two other water parks in the Coachella Valley. In this area we already have  traffic issues with concerts, marathons, etc. that would create even more. I see how much water evaporates from my pool and to have many multiples of that evaporating daily doesn't  make sense. This comes at a time when California is in a drought.     It would use a great deal of electricity as  well. In the not too distant past we experienced brown outs. This would contribute to the problem.     Light  pollution is another issue that has been getting worse since we moved here 25 years ago from Orange County.  Not nearly as many stars can be seen.     I grew up surfing, lived on the North Shore of Hawaii for a time and  have many friends that would love to have the opportunity to visit and surf at this resort. I would love for them  to visit and be able to enjoy that. But I would have to live with all the problems that it would cause, not  them...and it's not likely that we would even have the opportunity to surf the spot because it would be private.        I say no. A wave pool would be cool but the impact it would cause doesn't makes sense for our city. Plain and simple, it’s not right to build a huge surf park when we, as residents of La Quinta are told when we can  water our grass and how much water we can use. The idea of a surf park is great, but it doesn’t belong in the  middle of the desert.  With a water shortage this is wrong.   Destroys our peaceful desert area for local residents and the animals!   It’s  bad enough that the vacation rentals weren’t managed right to local residents got involved.    We don’t need or  want this in La Quinta.    This was a family town. Now has turned into festivals and parties!    The Mayor and city  council need to protect our city from anymore commercial projects. Enough is enough.     we are experiencing severe drought conditions and it is extremely wasteful to develop this wave project.  California prides itself with its beaches and surfing  belongs there and not in desert climate scorched with dry  and excessive heat in the summer. Human beings, animals and agriculture come first when we have water  shortages. STOP the waste. We moved to Andalusia 3 years ago and are full time residents.   We were attracted to this community because  of the views and the relative quiet of the surrounding area.  We could have gone anywhere but we chose here  not being told that the developer would likely sell the adjacent property sbd certainkt not to a wave and  transient hotel property.   It’s out of place and in complete discord with our community.    we are experiencing severe drought conditions and it is extremely wasteful to develop this wave project.  California prides itself with its beaches and surfing  belongs there and not in desert climate scorched with dray  and excessive heat in the summer. Human beings, animals and agriculture comes first when we have water  shortages. STOP the waste. We are not Orange County, San Diego County nor Los Angeles County. We live in a small quaint town in La  Quinta. Most customers for this project will be under 18 years of age. This will bring grafetti from to the area  from surrounding gangs. Traffic, trash will increase. This project won't be for the mostly retired individuals in the  area, PGA West, Triology. I'm against it.  Who the fuck opens something like this during a mega drought?!? We are in a critical water shortage in California. Our council has lost its credibility when it says this grossly invasive development will 'have little effect' on the  community.  Insane waste of massive amounts of water in desert/drought climate, 80 light towers in a  dedicated enviornmental black out community, etc, etc, etc. The land was zoned for residential and should stay that way.  City Council and the Zoning Commission should  honor the long established plans.  If you can change this ‐ what else will you change?   excessive use of scarce water and no valid requirement The community does not want this wave park, and those that do do so under false pretenses and  misinformation.     We’re in a drought and on the cusp of facing the most devastating impacts of climate change.  How do you justify this project from a community relations standpoint? A sustainability standpoint?     It’s clear  that your team is not considering the implicit costs of this project ‐ economic development for the sake of  economic development does not create a net positive benefit. Insane use of precious water. I think this is a ridiculous waste of water when our resources are at critical level. Concerned reference increased  traffic, etc. This is a desert. Inappropriate for this community Water!  I conserve as much as I can already.  NO more water developments. WATER! This project has a complete disregard to what is currently happening in our community and the larger area of  the coachella. How can you allow a project like this when we are experiencing a drought and water restrictions  are being brought in so that we are all more MINDFUL of how water is utilized. In addition, the amount of  electricity that is likely to be required to run this is also a concern. We already experience blackouts in the  summer and the amount of electricity this wave would consume would put additional stress on the system. This  project doesn't belong here. If people want to surf, move to the coast line and enjoy natural waves.  This wave park isn't need to effectively sell homes in this new community; people can go to Palm Springs for  waterpark activity. Noise, traffic, light pollution, waste of water. I'm concerned with the short term rentals and events that will increase the traffic and noise in our area.  I reside  in Griffin Ranch along Madison.  Another concern is the light pollution that will be created. The large amounts of water that will be used. We are a city concerned about recycling, waste, and use of water.  As a community it is important to use resources wisely. The second item is residents living there wanted a  serene, beautiful place to live without City type activities. A waterpark will bring in revenue at what cost?  Destroy the beauty of the desert area. Thank you for considering my thoughts.  this area will be a pariah area to the entire west.  This development is very dangerous to the future of this area.   wrong project, wrong time in the midst of a historic drought. This project is too large. I moved to a residential area…and I expect it to stay as zoned. Too many people, too  much traffic, too much water. It’s all too much. If something is already zoned in a certain way I’m VERY opposed  to changing the rules. A wave park does not belong in the desert. We’re in a drought’ La Quinta is so quiet, peaceful, and beautiful; and this development will likely spoil all of that. My wife and I strongly oppose this project. We purchased our retirement home in Trilogy La Quinta, a 55 and  over community, so we could enjoy our retirement years in peace and quiet.  We never imagined that the  zoning for the surrounding area could be changed to accommodate this mega resort which will result in a  tremendous influx of transient visitors, traffic, noise ‐ everything we were trying to get away from, not to  mention the outlandish amount of potable water that will be required for the wave park in the middle of a  worsening drought.  Please do the right thing for our communities and our environment and deny this project.   We want to express our strong opposition to the planned Coral Mountain Development and Wave Park.  My  husband and I moved to La Quinta and purchased our retirement home here in a 55 and over community so we  could enjoy our final years in peace and quiet. We specifically purchased in Trilogy La Quinta as it was far away  from the hustle and bustle and traffic of the downtown area.  We anticipated other housing developments and  hotels would eventually be built in the surrounding open spaces, but we never imagined a Tourist/Commercially‐ zoned mega resort with a Wave Machine, professional competitions, and entertainment stages would be built a  few blocks from our quiet retirement community.  This is so unfair to the surrounding homeowners who moved  here expecting a quiet and peaceful environment. Please do not approve this project. First, water! Don't waste our precious water for folly. Second...lights, sound and water should not be an issue  EVER in the desert. Third, save the beauty of this pristine location for all to appreciate. I say NO to the WAVE. Environmentally this is not a project for the desert.  We don't need to waste water on this and deplete the  water supply and add moisture to our environment.  The amount of people it would draw is not sustainable for  our community and maintain a quality of living. We are already in a severe drought. Putting in this wave pool will severely deplete what little water is left.  I  recently read the water restrictions that are going into effect for the valley so who is it that believes there is  enough water for the valley residents and support a wave pool?!   We purchase our home to enjoy the beauty, quiet and casual atmosphere of La Quinta. We purposely choose  this location to retire.  Now, with the proposed development it will degrade and change this beautiful  community.  Please reconsider  We purchase our home to enjoy the beauty, quiet and casual atmosphere of La Quinta. We purposely choose  this location to retire.  Now, with the proposed development it will degrade and change this beautiful  community.  Please reconsider  I am concerned about the waste of water because California is in a drought and because of the waste of  electricity because we need it for survival in the summertime. And also, because our city will be greatly affected  due to traffic, noise, and light pollution. We are in the midst of a mega drought and a water park makes no sense as does adding more STVR's, traffic,  noise, etc.  There will be a ballot issue to ban more STVR's next Nov. also.  No Wave Park should be allowed.   Fear of traffic issues on Madison and Monroe streets I am concerned that this building project with cause light pollution, which is something that we in La Quinta  have been committed to maintaining low lights.  Also, I feel the city can clearly see the impact that the tennis  garden, and Coachella fest have. And, soon we will have the arena off 1‐10. Further, I am concerned that this  facility uses a large area of land that could be used more responsible and in keeping with a desert  conservationist standard. I would like us to maintain a standard more protective of the land, water and  environment and traffic impact in developing new projects In our valley       I do not want the noise, traffic, event center turmoil.  I do not want to waste precious desert water on a lark.  I  do not want my neighborhood to transform into a tourist destination.  We  are  in  a  tremendous  draught  and  we   are  being  asked  to  change  our  watering  habits  etc.   The   Colorado  River,  Lake  Meade,  et al  are   way  down.   This  is   clearly   the  wrong  time  for  such  a  project. Absurd at this time to put this development in the desert where it will impact the serene desert atmosphere and  waste water and energy on a completely selfish past time of surfing on a man‐created Disneyland type "ride."   Ride the surf at the ocean where the real surfers play and respect the earth.   City of La Quinta is located in a desert; building a surfing resort is unnecessary waste of water and it will take  land away from desert animals and plants.  Stop wasting water with these types of projects. This is a bedroom community!!!!!  We are already cutting back on water usage… this is a no  Traffic and by default, air pollution, light and noise pollution!  We live in a damned DESERT! Using water of this  magnitude not only worsens the already human‐influenced humidity in this low desert resulting from excessive  golf resorts, lakes, and ludicrous landscaping, but is a sick waste of a dwindling resource needed for homes,  drinking, and agriculture, being a much higher importance than a place to SURF! Go to the Pacific Ocean! This will waste water and an environmental concern for everyone in the Coachella Valley.  Short Term rentals  should also not be allowed in La Quinta.  This project will be a huge disgrace to the community!  The water waste will be unconscionable as will be the  light pollution and added traffic.  This will be a blight on the city, please please please do not allow this to  happen.  Thank you for voting on behalf of the good of all La Quinta and CV citizens!  Bad plan for water wasting. Creating additional traffic, congestion, short term vacation rentals, night‐time light  issues.  All BAD.   Bad plan for water wasting. Creating additional traffic, congestion, short term vacation rentals, night‐time light  issues.  All BAD.   We bought here for its serenity and beautiful desert  living not carnival atmosphere.  I spent alot of money converting from Lawn to Desert Scape back in 2017. CVWD reimbused  me $2. per square  foot to save Water. I don't understand why CVWD wants me to conserve water when they approve a one billon  gallon wave pool ? Approval of a wave park in the middle of the desert in the middle of a prolonged draught would be a breach of  the municipality’s fiduciary duty on its face. Too much water consumption for the wave park. This looks like TOTAL waste of precious water. Our Governor has asked for a 15% reduction in water usage. The  Coachella Valley doesn't need a new water glutton! this would have a big impact on our peaceful community we move to this area as we once lived in an impacted  area huntington beach ca and traffic was so heavy in the area please not here.  plus we need water not too  waste it.    Please do not build this surfing resort down the street from our house.  We could not agree more that this  development would add an exorbitant amount of additional traffic to Madison Ave and surrounding roads, noise  and lights would be disruptive to the peaceful area that is our neighborhood in our distant little corner of  Coachella Valley, and it's simply shocking that the City of La Quinta would even consider developing a "water  resort" now when every river in the west is drying up, droughts are the norm in California and water is at a  premium for millions of west coast Americans.  This development is irresponsible and senseless.      You want to  build something useful at this site, how about some commercial retail like a grocery anchored center.  Especially  in light of the additional homes that are being built all around the area that need services.    Please DO NOT  allow this development to happen in the City of La Quinta!    THIS PROJECT IS INSANE..IN A TIME OF SEVERE DROUGHT!  18 MILLION GALLONS OF EVAPORATION EVERY  DAY!! WHILE WE ARE TOLD WE CANNOT EVEN WATER OUR LAWNS DURING THE DAY! It will destroy the peaceful nature of La Quinta. Traffic.  Waste water. Honestly, I am astonished that the City Council would even consider the proposed surfing resort when the  Western US is in the midst of a 1200‐year drought:    https://apnews.com/article/climate‐science‐business‐ colorado‐river‐environment‐6ceb8b539966d869169781997c7c05e6    and Lake Mead is at its lowest level since  it was initially filled in 1937:    https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/hourly/mead‐elv.html   http://mead.uslakes.info/level.asp    I understand that La Quinta and other communities here draw water from  a relatively well‐supplied aquifer. But even that aquifer is under stress now due to water use practices that date  back decades.    The very appeal (to some) of a surf resort in the desert is the reason it's a bad idea. The  message is basically: "Look what we can do: build a water‐intensive surf resort in the DESERT!" It's the same  thinking ‐‐ the "luxury/novelty" associated with squandering something precious? ‐‐ that undergirded water‐ intensive projects in the desert in the past. But we now understand that this thinking has led to a significant  water shortage today that places many people ‐‐ not least farmers ‐‐ in a precarious position.    And how long  before our aquifer drops to levels that threaten the quality of life that we enjoy here? And for what? We may  take it for granted...but how remarkably fortunate are we to live in this beautiful place ‐‐ which is, after all, a  desert ‐‐ and not worry about water for our basic needs?    This proposal is offensive and demonstrates how  recklessly out‐of‐touch some are with the water issues we face in the western states.     If people want to surf,  why not just travel 2 hours to the Pacific Ocean? Pretty easy.    Thank you for organizing this petition!    Chris   La Quinta This is not the place for this facility.  If they want to learn to surf or surf they can go to the beach.  We  have a whole coastline 2 hours away.  This is the desert and there is water insecurity on this planet. Surfing in the desert.  Get real people.  If you want to do something positive and land surrounding it.  We are in  a drought and therefore conservation should be the MAIN FOCUS not filling your agendas and coffers.  Silver  Rock development is using up valuable resources and has been going on for years.  STOP THIS ..LISTEN TO THE  RESIDENTS This project will increase noise and light pollution, traffic. It will destroy our peaceful country environment we  now experience.  Water use   Not the right development for the area and I don’t see why people would come to the desert and  buy into a surf park‐ San Diego and surfing is 2.5 hours away and a more logical place for surfing that doesn’t  require draw from the acquafer Water, electricity, peaceful co‐existence, traffic, first responders, climate impact, pollution.  We are being asked  by CVWD to conserve and yet here you are another development inlieu of a moratorium on over  building/developing.  Take a look at Silverrock, the abandoned building on Washington next the Callieo Bay, the  undeveloped and DUSTY area next the catholic church on Washington and mow you want to use up water and  resources to surf in the desert.  Get real, get smart get caring bout anything but the bottom Dollar. A wave pool that only benefits a few, ie guests or residents at Coral Mountain is in itself an insult to La Quinta  and Cochella locals.  However the most obvious is it’s ludicrous to build such a resort. The area is suffering a  major drought! The area already imports water. Water reserves are falling. Water saving measures are being  introduced because of these issues so obviously a wave pool is a ridiculous plan.   I do not understand how local  water provider can say they have enough water for the project but has big enough concerns for local users that  restrictions are required. Utterly ridiculous.  La Quinta is a quiet area. Changing zoning to put the resort is just  wrong. The zoning was done for a reason. Keep La Quinta how it is.  Profiteering is not what is good for the area,  and using huge quantities of water for the benefit of a few just stinks of corporate greed. One can only assume  that palms are being greased to even consider such a project is good for the area.    This project needs to be  stopped. A wave pool that only benefits a few, ie guests or residents at Coral Mountain is in itself an insult to La Quinta  and Cochella locals.  However the most obvious is it’s ludicrous to build such a resort. The area is suffering a  major drought! The area already imports water. Water reserves are falling. Water saving measures are being  introduced because of these issues so obviously a wave pool is a ridiculous plan.   I do not understand how local  water provider can say they have enough water for the project but has big enough concerns for local users that  restrictions are required. Utterly ridiculous.  La Quinta is a quiet area. Changing zoning to put the resort is just  wrong. The zoning was done for a reason. Keep La Quinta how it is.  Profiteering is not what is good for the area,  and using huge quantities of water for the benefit of a few just stinks of corporate greed. One can only assume  that palms are being greased to even consider such a project is good for the area.    This project needs to be  stopped. Congestion, higher density than originally zoned, light pollution, water and energy waste.  Being so close to the mountains I'm concerned about the impact on the environment and "night hunters" due to  the amount of light, noise and traffic.   We don't need another drain on our already short water supply.  Short  term rentals mean noise and traffic.  Many of us moved this far out for the tranquil, peaceful environment.   Don't do this to us. We do not need another surf park in the desert especially in this location.  Not only do we have the issues with  the excessive water usage when we are in a drought, it is the wrong type of development for this beautiful Coral  Mountain area.  The surf park in Palm Springs is almost completed and already had water rights. We don't need  another one .... Does not belong in the city of La Quinta, this is an area for family homes. With a water shortage how can we  allow a project that will use so much? Given the drought situation and the ever persistent warnings of it worsening with climate change; given the long  term construction costs, financial uncertainty, and constant construction noise and traffic; given the surge in  guest usage, traffic, and potential noise pollution, this project is not suited for this geographical location. I'm against the huge water usage, not counting that we have been in a drought for some years, I'm against the  increased noise, traffic and this development would diminish greatly the enjoyment of life for the residents of  surrounding communities; it is not in keeping with the City of La Quinta's Land Use Plan.  PLEASE DENY the Coral  Mountain Resort's rezoning. The biggest issue for me is that we live in the desert where water is always a concern, and the climate impact.  Hard to understand that the City council members are ignoring the water and climate issues this project will  negatively impact .our  The closed Kelly Slater surf park in Austin Texas provides a good picture of the possible out come in La Quinta. This project must be denied for the following reasons:    1.Waste of water,   2. Noise pollution,   3. Damage to  resources,   4.  Increase in greenhouse gases,   5.  Increase in large overcrowded special events and their  problems, 6. Destruction  the peaceful  nature of an entire community.  Residents are told to stop or cut back on watering our yards/lawns while a proposed private surf park is closed  to the public.    Residents are told to stop or cut back on watering our yards/lawns while a proposed private surf park is closed  to the public.   Excessive use of water in drought conditions.  Construction will take years and affect residents of Trilogy and  Andalusia.    Alternative routes are awful, especially for ladies travelling alone.  and will necessitate more gas  consumption.  I see nothing in this that will benefit existing residents. and the noise could be terrible. Water conservation, noise and lighting levels, interfering with nature Water conservation issues, noise problems, changing the landscape at this end of the valley No Short Term Rentals in a residential zoned community Too much noise, traffic and congestion. Not community friendly I am not anti‐development but some types of developments seem to be not only inappropriate but out of touch  with the reality of our current climate change/drought situation.  This development, to my mind, is both  inappropriate and insensitive to not only La Quinta as a community but to the environment as a whole.  I urge  you to not approve this development ‐ it should not take place in La Quinta or anywhere else that is dealing with  severe drought and water shortages.  Thank you. La QAuinta does not need a private surfing resort that will use up valuable water and electric resources Incredibly irresponsible given California's power and water issues. LaQuinta LaQuinta The reason why I’m signing this is because I believe that the waterpark or resort will be nonsense due to the fact  of this valley already has stage coach and Coachella fest where there’s already annoying people people don’t  know how to drive and route people all around so putting a festival like resort in a residential area will get a lot  of very mad people to go down to the city and they cancel just teasing to be honest with you I feel like people  are just trying to create nonsense so then they can destroy the ecosystem can destroy the water supply and  everything else and then when there’s no water for even the children on the council it’s not the residence of the  city it’s the council‘s phone because we just ran out of our water supply our land is now ruined because people  are trashy  in today society people need to start thinking instead of thinking out of the Crockett money is not  everything is nothing does not make the world go around if anything money is the reason why our earth is  failing and money is a reason why I ecosystem is failing. And there’s no need for money now put the money  back in the pocket leave the money in the pocket and keep it safe no one should be building a festival like resort  in a residential area if they honestly was using their brain.  We have lived  in La Quinta for 8 years and have enjoyed the quiet and beauty. The proposed wave park would  completely change the environment of our area. We live in Andalusia and the impact would be devastating. The  noise, traffic,light pollution,and excessive construction would truly destroy our beautiful area. Please don’t  allow this to happen and keep the zoning to residential. Charles Taylor,58170 Aracena  I am not anti‐development, per‐se. However, I feel strongly that a surf facility is just wrong for this part of La  Quinta, for the reasons stated in this website (water usage, noise, lighting, traffic, etc.). Water waste, power outages, obstruction of scenic views more traffic in the area.   irrevocable water waste when CA is experiencing a shortage, never mind the other problems We do not want noise pollution or traffic for the benefit of “a few private surfers” lets fight to save water.  Causing irrevocably waste of water is not the right choice. We do not want noise pollution or traffic for the benefit of “a few private surfers” lets fight to save water.  Causing irrevocably waste of water is not the right choice. I am concerned about the excessive water consumption, noise, traffic congestion, light pollution, and mostly  about the nature of La Quinta being forever changed for the monetary benefit of some large corporation. Please  do not allow this park to be built because the beauty and allure of La Quinta will be forever lost.  This is certainly not the highest and best use for this property.  A Low Class idea period to a high class area.   The entire project is a hideous affront to our beautiful, Quiet community; not to mention a gigantic waste of  resources. Too much crowding, noise, light and more.  It will destroy our tranquil neighborhood around Trilogy at La Quinta. I don't think our drought is going away any time soon . With global climate change, This would be a terrible use of resources maybe even crippling our future as a city. With global climate change, This would be a terrible use of resources maybe even crippling our future as a city. I think that having more people in La Quinta will really make it very hard to get around town and very hard for  law enforcement to control the city of La Quinta, as it is the traffic can't be control now.  traffic is driven by  drivers who really drive  FAST .  I have never clock the cars, But I sure at least 76% of drivers drive over the  limits. When I moved here I use to see police enforce and show some form of controlling the speed cars. I never  claim to be perfect, but I follow the speed. That is just one idea I have to start with. Makes no viable sense whatsoever  This project is the most ridulous development in the city's history.  The residents of La Quinta will not benefit  whatsoever and furthermore have no interest in patroizing it.  All this can do is destroy the most peaceful  community in the desert by the influx of trancients from all walks of life.  Noise polluntion will be uncontrolable.      Wasting desert water in the worse drought in over a century.  There  is no benefit for the Wave in La Quinta  and no residents want it. Ridiculous. There is already one being built in Palm Desert and one in Palm Springs to open. Now we are about  to be put on water restrictions, no watering during the day because of the drought but sure, build a water  wasting wave park that will never be full  increased traffic on madison.  waste our precious water supply.  just a bad idea. Environmental impact on climate change as well as disruptive to my lifestyle as resident of Trilogy. Rezoning to Commercial within a significant residential area  should not be allowed. Very poor use of our already limited water resources.  Traffic congestion, noise congestion, light pollution,  destroys our beautiful natural resources at the base of the mountain.  Please, can't we leave at least some land  to remain in its natural state?  Too much of it has already been marred forever by building houses, condos,  resorts, etc.  La Quinta has grown so fast since I moved here in 1994, and not always in positive ways. Traffic concerns  Waste of water and electricity        sewer use  light pollution                We need to think about sustainability with every new development. This project is not sustainable. I chose to  live in La Quinta 25 years ago, and I love the trails, the scenery of our mountains, and the peace that our  beautiful city allows us as residents to feel just by being here, surrounded by beauty. Coral Mountain and the  surrounding area is a big part of that beauty, and it will be ruined by this project. The water use for this  proposed project is outrageous in its scope, and in its inequity. Our dark skies are already becoming brightened  with residential lights, and this project's proposed lighting will have extreme negative impacts on the  surrounding area ‐‐ including closeby wilderness. GHG emissions from the project are unacceptable, especially  when the science of climate change consistently shows us that we need to STOP emitting, and find better ways  to build and live if we want this planet to be habitable for our children. The existing zoning is there for a good  reason, and this project throws it all out the window, and for what? A few more tourist dollars? This is very  short term thinking and completely irresponsible environmentally, socially and in every other way I can think of.  I will be voting against any Council member whenever they come up for reelection in the future who votes to  approve this zone change and project as proposed! The proposed project would be an everlasting blight on our community. We are seeing a little of how our lifestyle will be impacted with the current Coachella weekend.  We have three  weekends in a row like this.  The noise and traffic are awful.  Adding a big wave surf park will cause further  negative impact as you've pointed out in your material.  A surf park is definitely not a fit for our community.  As  situated, the traffic that is coming into town for events is centered into a very small area that is largely  residential.  Traffic in this first Coachella weekend is backing up traffic all around the festival venues.  Adding  more to this environment would be a nightmare. Wasting precious water and power to entertain out of towners in the middle of our desert environment is  irresponsible. Adding 80 ft light towers and 600 STRs are unconscionable intrusion to our residential  neighborhood s and more than likely impact residential property values. This is the wrong fit for La Quinta‐We moved out here to Andalusia to get away from the noise, and look at the  clear beautiful stars that shine in the sky‐We will now have traffic, obstruct our views of the gorgeous  mountains, not to even mention the many rentals that they are purposing  and the drought we are in. We will  now have special events 4 times a year, and overcrowded people throughout the entire year. This is not what  we signed up for‐we will be hearing continuous noise and lights that will be effecting the whole area around us  until 10pm‐this is not where the surf park belongs‐Not in this beautiful residential areas that surround these  beautiful mountains‐this will definitely destroy the peaceful nature of all of our communities, that we came to  La Quinta specifically for. Thank you Gail Taylor I'm concerned about water shortage, traffic & destroying the nature of the community.  The resort will be hurt the nearby desert environment and even if there is enough water now to serve the  resort, what about the future? It is not a good use of our water and it is not sustainable in light of climate  change with reduced supply and increased demand. Plus, we already feel trapped in our homes during the  festival events like Coachella, etc. If we add more events, the entire character of our south La Quinta  Neighborhoods will be changed forever ‐ and not for the better. May be a repeat ……As an adjunct to veritable objections to the wave park development, it very simply makes  zero sense that this project, riding on the heels of a Tourist/Commercial permit replacing the Low Density  permit that we relied on when we bought here 4 years ago,  would be approved ‐ literally in our “backyard”.   Natural resources will be impacted for generations to come.  This is not the place to attract Water Waisting  Private Developments with our water shortage already causing us to cut back on sprinkler usage for our homes. The paramount reason this park is a poor idea is the fact that the state of California is in a serious drought  situation and we should be doing everything we can to conserve water.  The residents of the portion of La  Quinta do not want this resort to be built here next to our homes and peaceful residential areas. Just wrong area for this project This project is in total odds with the objective of so many of the values the residents here find important for  their lifestyles and the reason we all moved here.  It’s shocking that it would even be considered as it violates so  many ordinances we value and on record. Not the least being a water shortage and the ruination of one of the  most beautiful mountain ranges in California. It seems that the only people who are fighting for this project are  the wealthy developers who don’t have to live with this on a daily basis.  Perhaps they should think about a  desert park in Manhattan??? This project is in total odds with the objective of so many of the values the residents here find important for  their lifestyles and the reason we all moved here.  It’s shocking that it would even be considered as it violates so  many ordinances we value and on record. Not the least being a water shortage and the ruination of one of the  most beautiful mountain ranges in California. It seems that the only people who are fighting for this project are  the wealthy developers who don’t have to live with this on a daily basis.  Perhaps they should think about a  desert park in Manhattan??? High mast lighting destroys dark sky night! I have concern on the impact of this project with our water and power and what dark skies we have left In support of the veritable objections to this project, I find zero benefits to residents living in surrounding  developments that are permitted for a low density environment ‐ save for a  close‐by restaurant on the projects  grounds. Hardly a reason to support a Tourist/Commercial permit to include a PRIVATE  Wave Park in our “  backyards” .    This is an insane idea considering the draught,and building in residential community People can surf in the ocean , we are in a drought situation!   Concerned for the water usage. We're in a drought and required to cut back. This development will use how  much water?  The water district gives us our bill and bases it on how much water we use.  They rate us as efficient and not  efficient etc.  They want us to use less water.  Don't approve this project that wastes our natural resource.  We  need to conserve water.  This will be terribly wasteful and we can't afford to do this.  Dorothy Dupree Seriously how could ANYONE in all honesty even consider such a ridiculous project in our valley ESPECIALLY in  what is considered "THE GEM" of the desert.  If approved, you can call La Quinta "THE GERM BAG" of the desert.    The pristine blue skies will dissappear just like it did in Orange County after the the city/county officials gave the  green$ light to RAPE the rolling citrus fields.  The Irvine Company was able to scalp the residents by dancing with  our elected officials who had no regards to what the local residents waned to maintain the quality of life they  wished for when they originally moved to OC.  We witnessed the demise one toll road and housing  developments were approved.    We beg you to make the morally right decision on this project    The amount of  water alone is just wrong and we will forward this to the State of CA to make sure they are aware of this project  for your consideration since this goes against what the valley "SPLASH" character AND the STATE of CA are  against.    SERIOUSLY how could any human approve such a project????  Why cant you members think about the  REAL issues like Salt and Sea and focusing on the electrical grids unable to handle current electricity shortages or  having to ask for a glass of water in a restaurant???  Helllllooo people    Signed a tax paying resident We already host a huge number of visitors for the Coachella Music Festival and Stagecoach Festival.  Why would  we even consider burdening our community with the proposed wave park and more parking and noise issues.  I  like the festivals but they are short term events.  The proposed wave park will be a long term nuisance.   Even if this project is approved, it will never be a financial success. as any projected income will not service the  debt. When that result is apparent, the developer will come to the government for financial help a.k.a  Taxpayers.    Besides rezoning changes, this project is a waste of natural resources ( water ). I think it was Robert  Ringer who said “if a developer could find the finances, you will see high rises in the middle of the Sahara  desert”. This nonsensical project qualifies. I am stunned that it is even being considered given we are in an EXTREME drought.  It is difficult enough to  comprehend how golf courses here have not redesigned their courses to create large waste areas similar to  courses in Tucson!  We live in a DESERT! All they want, to be on the map. But they care less about environment. Time to change council members in city  We are constantly dealing with droughts. We are becoming overpopulated. Why destroy the habitat of so many  animals.  The city is always pushing water and electricity management, where that with this project ?  definitely against the development of this "surf hotel development".  The city council should pull their heads out  of their ass.  We are to cut our water and electricity use.  For what, jerks like these developers. I feel like I have to let my lawn die to save water and places  including golf resorts are pristine with water.  FOOTNOTE: correct your grammar.  It’s “why YOU’RE concerned…” I'm concerned about water conservation, noise pollution and traffic. I have been a resident of La Quinta for 20 years.  This type of development proposed for the Coral Mountain  area is counterintuitive on many levels to the environmental challenges we increasingly face today and in the  future.  This project does not reflect the needs of the citizens of our community and should be rejected. I would  like to see something developed that would enhance our City and surrounding areas, not make it more like an  amusement park and tourist attraction. Just for starters...  ‐Grave concerns about the recklessness of approving any massive water‐use projects in this  time of severe drought  ‐The unbelievable lack of onsite sound testing in front of Coral Mountain  ‐Traffic  destroying the peace and tranquility in this lovely corner of the city.   ‐ The sudden revelation that most of the  housing will be short term rentals!  ‐ A totally inadequate response from the developer about the repurposing of  the wave pool should the business plan fail.  Increase STVA permits by 50% in La Quinta.  Traffic on Madison impact.  Build‐out could take decades and  potentially project could fail financially.  Stick with original La Quinta 2035 General Plan ‐ no amendments. Bad idea to have a commercial property built in the middle of a residential area. Also using drinking water  during a drought. I live in Puerta Azul and strongly oppose!   Noise  Lighting  Water  Traffic  Destroying a peaceful residential neighborhood! I feel this proposed project would be better suited closer to the I‐10 freeway.  La Quinta I live in La Quinta Cove and purchased a home here because of the natural beauty, the quiet, the dark night sky  full of stars, for a small town atmosphere, among a few of the reasons.  To allow this project will take away   some of the peace and small town charm, add so many more people, cars, light pollution, noise, and more.  This  project DOES NOT belong in a residential area.  This is NOT what this area was zoned for.  There are also  tremendous environmental concerns.  WE DO NOT WANT THIS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD and TOWN.   This tourist attraction does not belong here!  Locate it somewhere else. This is the wrong project for this area. We have too much notice and traffic already with Coachella.  La Quinta is a quiet community and should stay that way.  Short term rentals are anathema to our peace The potential water shortage would be devastating, though we may have it know, shouldn’t mean we should  use every drop of water available.  California is in a record drought with no way of predicting the future. The potential water shortage would be devastating, though we may have it know, shouldn’t mean we should  use every drop of water available.  California is in a record drought with no way of predicting the future. PLEASE PLEASE  PLEASE STOP this HORRIBLE WAVE PARK RESORT!!!!! This commercial enterprise will create noise and congestion in an existing quiet residential neighborhood.  La  Quinta does not need more short‐term rentals.  A wave park planned during a drought makes no sense.   Not suitable to the area because of traffic, noise and light pollution. Put it up on I‐10.  the last thing la quinta needs is more short term rentals…a wave park in the middle of a drought ? I am concerned about the noise from the turbines, the noise from the park in general and the increased traffic  and traffic noise. I do not want this type of facility anywhere near my home as I believe it will negatively affect  values in the immediate area.  Not only is it an alarming waste of our precious water, but certainly not suited for the area and it's impact on  surrounding homes.  Just the thought of a "water" park in the middle of a desert should signal serious concerns,  particularly when California is considering water restrictions in general.  What more do you need to know?? The southern end of La Quinta is not the place for a waterpark. Even if I can’t see or hear it the traffic on  Madison will increase exponentially. This does not belong in the middle of a residential community  The additional traffic will make this area unlivable for residents 1) Poor use of limited resources‐ extreme waste of our precious resource of potable water during our longest  drought years yet.   2) Negative Environmental impact to native flora and fauna, light and noise pollution.   3)  Very little benefit to local communities, no access to use of facilities, no affordable housing, overcrowded track  homes.   4) There are multiple other wave pool projects throughout CV already, and open to the public, why add  another resource drain.  Does not fit in with our residential community should be closer to Hwy 111 This resort is not suitable in a residential area  Does not fit in with our residential community should be closer to Hwy 111 Noise. Traffic. Lights. This is a terrible fit for a residential area and is better suited out by the new hockey arena,  along the 10 Hwy. Traffic disruption on Madison  Light and noise pollution  Water use  Zoning not approved California is in an extreme drought.  This project is using our drinking water!  Exremely callous and thoughtless  treatment of our land.  This is the wrong development for the following reasons: crowds, traffic, lighting, water usage. Being asked to conserve water during this historic drought while wealthy companies use our desert as a profit  project and waste millions of gallons of DRINKING water is disheartening. It ruins the sense of community here.  Thermal doesn’t even have clean drinking water for all its residents. How is the drainage solutions designed in  this proposed park? With so much water, the drains can breed mosquitoes increasing the valley’s chances of  mosquito borne diseases.  This park should not be built. It will have a significant negative impact to the environment and wildlife in the  area. In addition, it is a private club, only open to a select few, and not even open to the residents of the area.  Having a water park in the desert is a completely irresponsible use of water and should not be allowed.  waste of water which will impact the environment... This is an irresponsible use of water in the desert and in the middle of one of the worst droughts in California  history. It is also not open to the public, so this wasted water usage is limited to a small number of elite   this park's footprint, construction, water usage, earthquake risk and light pollution interferes with the wildlife  that is vital to the local ecosystem and which is an actual attraction already enjoyed by a majority of it's citizens,  tourists and those of us who work to preserve and encourage these animals to be part of our neighborhood.  Our state/county/city is experiencing continued drought conditions and creating such a facility with such  frivolous use of water is a statement about whether our city is really a gem or not.  And if approved, it will only  be available to those with the money to "pay for it."  If we are going to use recreational water for anything, it  should go for the good of ALL our citizens not just rich vacationers.  I do not want extra traffic, short term rentals or crime to increase that usually comes with transients.  I want  Ciral mountain to stay as beautiful as it is without development with a water park of all things. I do not want extra traffic, short term rentals or crime to increase that usually comes with transients.  I want  Ciral mountain to stay as beautiful as it is without development with a water park of all things. The extensive use of potable water is not in keeping with the current environmental conditions and the noise,  light and traffic will make our beautiful desert like the LA Freeways‐congested and chaotic. This will ruin of community and waste valuable water resources. DROUGHT....and as said all along...WRONG place for surrounding communities and homeowners who will be  dealing with issues that will come with this horrible plan....traffic....traffic....traffic....this is WRONG place! Drought!! This is not at all what the developer proposed when they can to our community for a presentation.  They said it  would NOT be for tourists and only for homeowners.  It has now turned into a rezoning of Tourist Commercial  which is not at all what was relayed.  Also, the lighting goes against the Dark Skies regulations.  Allowing STVR  also goes against the cities current ban on new STVR permits.  This development should not be allowed to get  these permits if the rest of the city can not.  Our concerns include increased traffic and noise.  We can't believe that in the midst of drought and urging  people to conserve water, we would even be thinking about a surf park in La Quinta.   We moved to Trilogy for the peaceful enjoyment of a rural lifestyle.  The dark skies and quiet environment  allows us to hear coyotes and owls at night.  This project will completely upset the community and the animals,  birds and lizards that live here.  Putting a wave park in the desert is a bad idea.  The waste of water, electricity  and resources to support something that no one in the community will use is a bad idea.  Trilogy is an over 55  community, there are no surfers living here.  Please vote NO to the Wave Park.   Wasting water  Too noisy  Will create traffic Water conservation  Noise control  Added traffic  this park does not belong in a residential neighborhood The original zoning was meant to protect homeowners from commercializing too much around there  neighborhoods and properties. This should remain intact. The peace beauty and harmony of this special area will be ruined. This would be the beginning of opening up  many cans of worms starting with this proposed project.  Please re‐think it.  Thank you As a seasonal resident, I find the idea entirely inappropriate for the betterment of this community. A wave park  will bring noise, traffic, light, crowds and additional garbage. In addition, the quiet residential value of the  homes near such a disastrus choice will definitely lower home values and community values.     We are in the  midst of a record 1200 year drought.... NOT ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE!!!!! The environmental statement DOES  NOT address the other TWO water usage projects in the valley which are already approved. SERiOUS SERIOUS  ENVIRONMENTAL WRONG to have yet another wave park! This is the SECOND one in a 10 MILE AREA!!!! NO  ONE NEEDS OR WANTS two wave parks.  I'm not opposed to building homes in the current space that is zoned as residential.  I am opposed to the  proposed resort and the wave park and the serve impact to the tranquility of the residential area I moved into  during  the late fall of 2020.  It will impact the dark skies that we currently enjoy.  It will impact the area with an  increase traffic along with additional traffic lights to handle the traffic flow.  It will change the landscape of a  beautiful residential area.      I feel that if the Mayor and City Council approve the rezoning a residential area to  build the wave park is an irresponsible action by the builder all those who approve it, especially with the severe  drought have been facing and are already facing in additional to water restrictions by Governor Newsome.  I  also feel that rezoning a residential area to accommodate a wave park and short term rentals will have a  negative impact to our property values.  This will also increase our taxes as you will need more police to handle  an increase in crime.  What is the ROI from builder to the City of La Quinta?  How much will the City receive?    How much are you planning on raising our taxes to accommodate this wave park.    This project has so many red  flags ‐ my vote is still no on the wave park. We recently purchased a home in La Quinta to enjoy the quiet, less traffic, and beauty of the mountains.  We  planned to make this our retirement home in a couple of months.  This development plan is contrary to all the  reasons we chose La Quinta.  We are opposed to these plans. Very concerned about the traffic and non‐resident individuals that will attend this project. I am concerned about the negative environmental impact that this resort will have on the surrounding area.   First of all I think that having this large construction will destroy important wildlife and plant natural habitat.  First by earthmoving activity, then by continued noise, air and light pollution from all the people and vehicles. I  think it will be a massive waste of water to have this particular recreational activity in such an arid part of the  USA. I think it will be taking water away from the community. I think the resort will change the area for the  Many reasons. See www.ccolq.org Please do not ruin our beautiful community with this Hotel and water park.  It will destroy the natural beauty of  La Quinta and create tons of noise and congestion.  Isn't it bad enough we have to contend with Cochella every  I do not want a hotel and 600 short term rentals going in our community.  The traffic congestion and noise will  greatly impact our quiet enjoyment.  Drought! Please don’t change La Quinta, we don’t need to noise or traffic! The addition of 750 nightly rental units and 4,000 potential occupants and noise is of major concern We should be conserving water, not using it for waves for the rich.  I moved to La Quinta for the “community vibe” we have. I love Old Town and all the locals. The music and sports  events that already are here bring in revenue for all the small owner restaurants and businesses. I really see no  positives from building a wave.  Waste of Water! This project is insane and a violation of public trust  this will bring additional traffic and noise and interference with wildlife.  It will help destroy a peaceful, beautiful  atmosphere we now enjoy additional noise, traffic, interference with wildlife, aesthetic negative impact We very much oppose this project . The serenity and beauty of this end of the valley will be changed forever.  This will create more noise and more traffic. Our roads have become very congested already. There are now  traffic lines  to get through the roundabout at 52nd and Jefferson . We have lived here for 9 years and have seen  a drastic change with traffic. Once the Wave Park gets its permits no doubt they will be able to make changes to  membership requirements, housing prices, and adjusting the rules to suit their needs and not the community.  I  can’t believe a project of this size can get permits when we have been waiting for 3 months to get a permit  approved for doors for our home renovation. The permit approval process for La Quinta is already a nightmare.  Once this project is approved there’s no turning back.  Noise and lighting pollution. Unlike a golf course that basically operates from dawn to dusk, this project will be  in full operation into the night. Also, shirt term rentals are not conducive to this area. Too much drain on water and city resources. Bad for LQ Noise and lighting pollution. Unlike a golf course that basically operates from dawn to dusk, this project will be  in full operation into the night. Also, shirt term rentals are not conducive to this area. Are the city founding fathers going to let our beautiful city be decimated by overcrowding, traffic, noise, light  pollution and waisting of our precious water resources by permitting the rich to play and then leave the mess?  I  say NO. I vote and have a big mouth so look out for more criticism from me. This play resort has an erroneous water use calculations in its environmental report to the planning commission  and will hasten need to abandon La Quinta due to lack of water...please vote against it so we can all enjoy LQ  longer  and not run out of water  This wave park is a terrible idea from an environmental impact perspective, as well as what a development like  this will do those of us who live in this community.     There is already a high level of traffic and unpoliced speed  issues on Madison and nearby roads, and too many issues associated with short term rentals For people who  come to visit here and so often show disrespect for the community and those of us who live here.     The  increase in noise, traffic and volume associated with so many people coming to an attraction like this will have  long‐term deleterious impact on those of us who have chosen to live here peacefully and quietly. Please  consider the negative impact this development will have on so many people.  Please deny this application. Over crowding is not at all good for this beautiful environment we just moved here to retire and get away from  Southern California crowds.  Concerns about traffic, water usage, noise, lighting. I am concerned about the added traffic, the impact to Coral Mountain, a large water park during a drought no  less, short term rentals and the crime this added burden will bring.  I say NO!!! This is happening when it doesn't make any sense to use any extra water or create more traffic. agree with all stated concerns from surrounding communities regarding the negative quality of life impact and  potential unaddressed economic/financial downside to the city of La Quinta from developer  and project failure.  Drought, Noise, Traffic, Nature, Pollution Water issue when in a severe drought. Rezoning this high traffic tourist spot in residential area is not fair to  neighborhoods. This is crazy and unjust! Don’t destroy our city! Waste of water, too much traffic It is a waste of precious drinking water and a threat to wildlife.  Horrible excess and waste.  Let’s keep La Quinta  peaceful. I moved to this area of La Quinta for a serene, quite life.  Bringing this entity here at this time threatens all of  our peace. Also, in view of the historic Drought we are in, it’s unconscionable that a water park will be our  neighbor. I am vehemently opposed. Wrong project for our community. It will adversely impact the depleting water resources for our valley, the daily  noise levels for 10 hours which will reverberate from the Coral Mountains are constant.  The Wave Pool is a  private venue. Our neighborhoods will not benefit from it financially, nor will our real estate values increase  thru this venture. It is a phenomenally dumb idea in a drought.   The wrong project in the wrong place. Rezoning, water usage, traffic, noise, lighting…it just all wrong.  This is totally the wrong use of this residential area.  This commercial project will impact detrimentally on the  quality of life on the surrounding homeowners and adjacent developments, i.e. Trilogy at La Quinta and  Andalusia , as well as others, and environmentally unsound.   This is not the right project for this site.   1.  This level of water usage at a time of increasing drought in the southwest endangers long‐term water supply  for life sustaining usage.  Expected water allocations cannot be guaranteed indefinitely if the drought continues  unabated, particularly in light of documented climate change.    2.  Greenhouse gas emissions for this project  will require carbon emission credits that should be allocated to more useful purposes.    3.  The area in which  the resort is proposed is zoned for low density residential and golf course (with a tiny corner zoned commercial,  presumably reserved for a small market), a fact researched and relied upon by citizens who chose to live in this  area.  Changing this zoning to commercial/tourist and allowing hundreds of short‐term rentals will  fundamentally change the nature of the neighborhood, violating the trust the neighboring residents have placed  in the La Quinta long‐term land usage plan and the zoning process.    4.  Noise reflects off Coral Mountain.  I  have personal experience with this from a property on Liga in The Citrus that experienced substantial traffic  noise when the stop sign was removed at the Avenue 52 entrance.  Noise from the wave park will be  substantially louder and unremitting.    5.  La Quinta is known for its dark skies.  Eighty foot light towers are  inconsistent with this designation.    6.  All of these negative impacts will be born by the neighboring community  in favor of a PRIVATE and EXPENSIVE short‐term resort experience largely unavailable to that community.    7.  If  La Quinta ultimately finds that the negative impacts of such a resort development are adequately mitigable, the  city should find an alternative location readily accessible to the highway and surrounded by more commercial  development.  The Coral Mountain property should, instead, be reserved for the responsible residential  development that current zoning and the long‐term land use plan envision. This project will create traffic, noise, congestion.  I'm concerned about water usage, lights and the disturbance  of our quiet enjoyment which we have in this area.  This is the wrong project for this parcel. La Quinta.  We are in a serious drought and the zoning should not be changed. We that live in the immediate area moved here because because it’s away from everything else. The light and  noise pollution alone will destroy the peace in the area. We all know we are to conserve water…. To make a  zoning change that will destroy the peace in the area is outrageous. Water use. Traffic. Allowing this project to go through would have a be a negative  impact on our community, when something this  size comes along its all about the money and not the people. Make the right decision for the folks who were  Noise, traffic, environmental impact. Disruption of the pristine corner of LQ. PLEASE SAY NO.  The proposed development creates traffic and light pollution that cannot be mitigated. Totally inappropriate for the fragile desert which we love and enjoy. The entire proposal is ridiculous!  Outsiders who don't care, only think of  the possible money from tourists who  don't know the difference... Our aquifers  are greatly reduced already. With the current drought now reaching historic proportions, a water park that can not recycle its water for  public use, and constantly needs fresh water for its patrons, is a ridiculous and unnecessary venture. We live in a  desert! We don't need this in La Quinta! The impact will be severe and devastating for the surround areas besides La Quinta..   wrong place at the  absolutely worst time to develop a water wave park and the ridiculously overpriced housing.  I don't want to have this here  Concerned about the water usage and the negative impact on the ENTIRE cochella valley.  Poor use of limited water resources, traffic and noise around nearby residential areas, tall light polls destroy the  night sky.  Road access to the site is limited so already busy Madison and Jefferson Streets will be adversely  impacted. A wave park development would be an environmental and ecological travesty for the Coral Mountain area  Traffic, noise, light issues. Definitely not the right project for this location.  We have owned a home at PGA W for 7 years and have now lived in Lions Gate for 10 years. I can hear the daily  traffic at the 58th and Madison intersection and dread the day when all the home building stops on 58th with  Alta Verde, Beazer, Toll Brothers and others finish. We have zero police presence down here and I could go on  for hours. I don't get what your trying to achieve besides your tax base. All of the reasons for not allowing this project are clearly outlined on the website.i agree with all of them. I have concern respecting the use of water and as well as the disruption to the residential areas. Keep the land the way it is. We specifically chose to purchase our retirement home in La Quinta as it is a beautiful and peaceful area.  The  wavepool will simply change this area for the worse, bringing in significant short‐term rentals and increased  traffic.  This possible change to our beautiful area is not what we bought into when we decided to purchase a  We specifically chose to purchase our retirement home in La Quinta as it is a beautiful and peaceful area.  The  wavepool will simply change this area for the worse, bringing in significant short‐term rentals and increased  traffic.  This possible change to our beautiful area is not what we bought into when we decided to purchase a  #1 NO SHORT TERM RENTALS IN LA QUINTA  #2 ALTHOUGH WE HAVE THE AQUAFER, DRAIN OF WATER FROM  THIS PROJECT WILL TAKE IT’S TOLL  #3 ADDITIONAL DRAIN OF ELECTRICITY WILL CAUSE UNDO STRESS ON THE  GRIDS  #4 UNACCEPTABLE REZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL TO TOURIST COMMERCIAL  #5 WAVE PARK PROJECT  WILL BE THE DECLINE OF LA QUINTA  #6 lOWER HOME VALUES Water & electricity usage, noise & traffic increases,  600 additional short term rentals ALL CONTRIBUTING to the  decline of our beautiful La Quinta.   Any counsel person who votes for the above is NOT representing the  citizens and and homeowners of La Quinta The needless use of water and the over saturated market for transient people in our valley is destroying the  hometown atmosphere of our city.  This Mayor/City manager/City council are going against the will of the  This project will bring massive amounts of traffic, congestion and noise along with invasive light at night into an  area always designated for quiet enjoyment.  This type of resort belongs near the freeway.  The traffic our  communities complain about that is part of Coachella will now be part of our every day lives.  I think this was  poorly thought out with only the extra tax revenue being a consideration by La Quinta city counsel.  It will  negatively affect the property values of the surrounding communities of Andalusia, The Quarry, Lions Gate, etc.  and Trilogy ‐ not to mention PGA & Griffin Ranch that will need to endure all the in and out traffic of daily users  of the park and short term rentals.  This should NOT be approved.  Camille Pfeifer Everything about this project will adversely affect the La Quinta residential neighborhoods.   WE are in a mega drought and the diversion of fresh water to build a surf park here in the desert is political  malpractice on a grand scale.  Follow the money and make sure that no elected official in La Quinta is taking  "contributions" from anyone connected with this "development" . . .  We’re picked the quite community only because of the quiet surroundings This would be a terrible thing to happen to our community. The noise, the traffic, and the use of water are only  some of the reasons this should be stopped.  This project would ruin the peace, tranquillity and beauty of our community.  La Quinta THIS WAVE PARK SHOULD NOT HAPPEN. THIS A RESIDENTIAL AREA YOU WOULD CHANGE THE REZONING CODE  TO SATISFY BIG MONEY. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THE CONCERNED RESIDENTS THAT LIVE IN THIS AREA. The scope of this project in the are it is proposed to be sited and the intended wave park is incompatible with  the long term city plan for the residential area it is to be located in.....follow the money. This development belongs at Anaheim, not La Quinta. I want permanent neighbors, not screaming kids, extra heavy traffic on Madison Street and brilliant lighting at  Planning and zoning is a sacred commitment that a city makes to its current and future residents.  That  commitment protects residential areas from the encroachment of commercial development which would  degrade the residential neighborhoods.       No to the EXCESS addition of traffic, construction, noise of water park, water use, changing of our 'Dark Skies',  STR's and the transient population, partying population and excess trash, tourist zoning, sound bounce off the  mountains thruout La Quinta, and traffic throughout La Quinta. We moved her from LA to get away from all that  ‐ especially damaging would be to the feel of what makes La Quinta, La Quinta!!!! Voting NO to the Wave. We all purchased homes in a residential area. We do not want the land re‐zoned. We are in a drought and  CANNOT afford to waste water. Their "recycling" of water is everything but. We simply don't want the tourists  interrupting our everyday lives. If you are going to allow this  to take place then you should buy every single  home within 10 miles of the water park. Those homeowners did not purchase such expensive and exclusive  homes to now have land near them re‐zoned for this absolute disruption of our neighborhoods. Please don't  allow this water park to be built. We need now more than ever to conserve our land and water. This is a community of home residents that live here year round. It is BAD enough that we have so many tourists  renting out private homes for weekend parties and distributing the year round residents living in these  neighborhoods. THE WAVE DOES NOT BELONG IN THESE NEIGHBORHOODS!! IT SHOULD BE IN A COMMERCIAL  AREA NEAR DISNEYLAND!! Noise  Traffic  Right next door to a senior retirement community  Noise  Traffic  Right next door to a senior retirement community  This is a quiet residential area that is not appropriate for this type of huge and disruptive commercial operation.  Move it to a commercial area that is more appropriate.  Too bright and too loud for a residential era. Additionally, this is a desert and we are currently (usually) in a  Too bright and too loud for a residential era. Additionally, this is a desert and we are currently (usually) in a  For Heavens sake people we are in the middle of the worst drought ever and you want to put in a water park?  That does not make sense to me! Is there someone at City Hall with a crystal ball that knows the Heavens are  going to open up and there will be water aplenty once we build this amusement park. This project would transform the area into an obtrusive tourist/business area that would seriously harm the  original neighborhood aspect of a large adjoining area.  A bad idea that wastes water, damages life‐styles, and  overburdens the whole area. Water use alone should stop this project.  I understand the desire to tap into additional real estate tax revenues and sales tax revenues in Riverside County  but the notion of building a large entertainment complex with a 18 million gallon water filled pool in the middle  of a residential area is sheer lunacy.    There is already a potable water issue, as evidenced by turning irrigated  lawns back into desert landscaping using drip irrigation, needed to support the existing residential needs and  water needed to support the irrigation needs of the fresh fruit and vegetables grown in the valley, also a sizable  part of the Riverside County economy.  And someone thinks we need to add a wave pool capable of evaporating  ?? gallons of water each day, to support folks who want to pretend they are surfing in the Pacific??  Add to that,  the Chlorination and sanitary chemicals needed to keep the pool safe for the "Surfers" would be a sizable  expense for Riverside County to process through their sanitary sewer system.    Surly you jest!!    The residential  streets leading from I‐10 or from CA 111 were neither designed nor built to handle the amount of traffic needed  to support the wave park.   The cost to improve and maintain the residential streets, Washington, Jefferson and  Madison from CA111 or I‐10 to the corner of 58th and Madison, would cost considerably more than any tax  revenues you raise from Real Estate and Sales Taxes.  In addition, there are few if any commercial  establishments (think gas stations, grocery stores, restaurants etc) needed to support that traffic and the  additional high‐density housing.    If you want to build a Wave Park, locate it near CA86 as it splits off I‐10 and  heads South toward the Thermal Airport or Thermal race track.    Go build it at the Salton Sea, using the water  already available.  It is already salty caused by the same evaporation that would occur at the wave pool.  Why not fix the Salton Sea and restore it as a recreation area, and remove it from the list of growing hazards  that Coachella Valley faces.  Where are we going to go for water when the Colorado River scramble begins and  we can no longer fill the pools in the Valley. Will we become the proud, tax paying owners of something that  shouldn’t have happened? We are in a drought. Adding this many more units using water is very wrong. Adding a surf park is ludicrous. I moved here for quiet and tranquility, this will forever change my life for the negative in my later years! So  disappointed! Some many other ares this would have a positive impact, commercial zones. Water usage, added traffic, noise, high light towers, and added increase in STVR’s in our neighborhood.  We are totally against this project. We are continually told to conceve water in the desert, so why any city  would even consider such a ridiculous project is beyond us. This is a major threat to our future water supply. Absolutely inappropriate . I am concerned about the extravagant use of water. the high light towers, the noise and traffic that would be  created by a wave park. Noise, lights, traffic, water waste. We moved to this area specifically because it’s quiet and without traffic. It’s unconscionable that this can even  be considered especially due to lack of water that’s getting worse each year. Please reconsider allowing  something this disruptive to happen in our lovely city.  La Quinta La Quinta This has to be the most ridiculous  planning for an area that I have witnessed in the 22 years that we have been  residents in La Quinta.  The pristine area surrounding Coral Mountain will be destroyed by The Wave Resort.  Noise, lights, traffic‐ seriously!!?? Here we are always discussing water resources and this appears. I believe the  Environmental Groups must have totally flipped out over this horrible plan. Money must talk. This is absurd! I don’t want the noise, traffic, light pollution or the WASTE OF WATER! We are in a drought! this  is a small town and we need to keep our resources safe and secure. It is wrong on all fronts and I objet to it. NO  This area is a peaceful residential neighborhood! This proposed wave park is completely out of place here and  should never have been considered for this location. Of course water usage, noise and light pollution, and traffic  are all major concerns as well. I urge you to deny the rezoning application! This is a Private Water Eating Monstrosity. With any common sense at all it should have been Quashed long ago.  Wake Up & Conserve This is a Private Water Eating Monstrosity. With any common sense at all it should have been Quashed long ago.  Wake Up & Conserve I’m not in favor of this because it’s disturbing out beautiful desert. Too many visitors to our valley leading to  congested roads. So many other reasons  Deny this rezoning! It will be too busy. Too noisy.  Use too much precious water.  ISSUES I AM CONCERNED WITH ‐ 1.WATER 2.TRAFFIC 3. NOISE 4.LIGHTS 5. REZONING OF LA QUINTA  DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN ISSUES i AM CONCERNED WITH ‐ 1.WATER 2.TRAFFIC 3. NOISE 4.LIGHTS 5. REZONING OF LA QUINTA  DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN Too much water! ‐ Don’t waste our precious water on this folly.  No more short term rentals.  Concern about traffic congestion,  noise, rowdiness, loss of our night sky.  Why would you even consider it!!! Need to conserve water.  Noise pollution.  Rowdiness from the events plus the short term rentals.  Congested  traffic.  It would mean  goodbye to our night skies.  Need I say more.  NO!!!! The water issue and traffic issue and noise issue I am against the coral mountain resort  Simply cannot imagine why this project ever got this far given its impact on the desert water situation and  community in general.  Unconscionable. Just take a drive around the area of Coachella, Thermal and Mecca and you will see acres and acres of fresh  vegetable and fruits being raised and harvested.  This  is far more important to having food on our tables than  having a useless wave park in the Coachella Valley.  What would you rather have....food or a wave park? This project does not fit the surrounding community Noise, light , water and peaceful existence  The proposed project will bring noise, use excessive water during a drought, and promote private party  atmosphere. THIS DOES NOT BELONG IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. La Quinta has not set out to become an extreme sport destination. Thousands of retirees and residents headed  for retirement have purchased expensive property, paid taxes, and supported this community. This zoning  change would disrupt all of that. At a time when there is a California drought, using 16.7 acres of water is  Inappropriate use. The community disturbance including noise/traffic/17 80' tall light towers is not acceptable. The water waste is  completely inconsistent with our current need for conservation. Please reject the zoning change. Noise and traffic pollution, water waisted, Light pollution all add up to the worst idea in the desert so far.  Why?  for private use or for the rich only.  Bad Idea from greedy developers. Say NO Property owners rely on inforced zoning to preserve their way of life and investment. This is the City of  LaQuintas governments responsibility .... that's why we elected them. Property owners rely on inforced zoning to preserve their way of life and investment. This is the City of  LaQuintas governments responsibility .... that's why we elected them. Water waste is not a good idea in the desert; much less with ongoing years of drought.      Concerned about how the wave park would be detrimental to the community .  Noise  Water conservation should be happening now!  This is ridiculous to put a water park in the desert.  And it will  forever change the landscape and beauty of the area not to mention the wildlife who will be affected  La Quinta  The most concerning issue about this project is the amount of water that will be used. We live in a  desert and there is a limited amount of water. To use this precious resource as if it is unlimited is wasteful.  There has been no information given on how much water will be used each month and how much water will be  lost due to evaporation. With much of the state in drought right now this project makes no sense especially in  the desert. Not to mention other concerns: noise, glaring lights, increased traffic and more short term rentals in  an area zoned for residential.  The Wave Park does NOT BELONG HERE!!! The Wave Park does NOT BELONG HERE!!! The level of noise created by this wave park and short‐term rentals, events by zoning as recreational area will  lower property values and use valuable drinking water from our aquifers.  Impact on water and wildlife make this park an insane idea. Drought, shortage of water, traffic, over‐development.This project is so bad in so many respects. Too much noise, locals can't afford to go there, too much traffic  My major concern is the 18 million gallons of drinking water needed to sustain the wave pool.. especially during  a drought and when we’re all asked to conserve water. The impact on wildlife and the pollution caused by noise  and light for this area.. and Im disturbed by the change of an established zoning code for this area.. how is that  Too much over building! Thus valley is too small to handle it .. stop the wave !  Noise, announcements, massive lighting & events from surf park will impact all of us surrounding this proposed  development. Major concern regarding use of aquifer water in this time when we are already conserving water. I am also  concerned about the noise and light pollution, additional traffic and transient partiers this project will bring to  what is a nice quiet residential community. I understand loudspeakers will be announcing waves every 3  minutes throughout the day, noise from the wave machine will be constant and the light towers mean we will  no longer have beautiful dark star watching nights. There is already a problem with short term vacation rentals.  Adding more of these and more events will change life for residents forever. This project seems to go against all  Water consumption This bedroom community I love will be forever changed . La Quinta The list of issues that the proposed re‐zoning and ensuing commercial usage that come to mind are, in no  particular order:  changes the whole environment of this end of the valley, where is the water coming from and  how much will be used by the water park (we're in a long term drought guys!), more traffic, how much noise will  this generate and how far will the noise travel, bad, bad idea!  Who will profit from this venture, this proposal  looks like out‐of‐towners raping the land, not giving back to the valley, ignoring the locals who will be most  affected.        There are much more serious issues  in our world to be addressed.  At the very least all questions  asked by community members need to be taken seriously and answered in detail.  We do not need to find out  after the fact that complete analysis was never done.  Think of abandoned Olympic sites that are useless and a  blight on the land.  Think of cities beginning to turn down such selfish developments.  Think very, very carefully  before ploughing ahead and making a big mistake. Don’t care a whit about out of town developers who want to create a Waikiki in our rich, specie‐diverse desert.  Go somewhere else! Take local government officials with you! Seriously? And this is a good idea because……?  The Colorado Desert is a fragile environment and home to the  threatened desert tortoise and endangered bighorn sheep, both of whom roam that area. Also, dig down 10’  and you’ll find artifacts. The usual suspects: greedy developers from out of town and greedy city officials!! The  whole idea shouldn’t have even been entertained!!!  Water usage. Zoning, noise Building a wave lake in the desert during a years long drought is irresponsible and environmentally  unsustainable. Please do not approve this zoning change. Please choose environment over development dollars.  This is a huge development project that Is neither needed nor wanted by our desert community and that exists  primarily to enrich a small group of developers and investors.  It will unnecessarily drain our community of  water and resources that are already in short supply and adversely impact our desert quality of life.   a ridiculous project to give money to a few!  stop it now! La Quinta I am concerned about noise, excessive use of water, the destruction of habitat for animals, and light pollution.  I  don't see how this development makes La Quinta better when it impacts so many things that people come here  to enjoy.  This proposal is completely wrong on ALL levels.  Please do not allow it to be built.  Thank you. La Quinta Leaders,   What are you THINKING ??? California continues yearly to be in a state of severe drought‐  and you find it acceptable to drain precious water for a multi million gallon surf pool? Are you crazy or are you  being $$$ paid off by the greedy developers ?    Don't be ridiculous ! You are being used as puppets for  big  corporate business at the cost to many, many more serious concerns.  As for the gigantic imposition of the 80  daylight bright light towers, LaQuinta will soon be the laughing stock of  the magazines and media ‐ and your  stargazers  dark nights policies will go down in history as a gorgeous relic of the past.    Valleywide, We’ll  be  looking forward to all of the Environmental Impact Reports to dismiss your fanciful and ridiculous projects.  We are new residents in CA and La Quinta and this resort is out of keeping with all the things that attracted us  here.  In this time of a protracted drought, with no end in sight, it is irresponsible even to consider this project.   It seems no consideration has been given to the tax paying neighbors who will be greatly affected. I like the quiet and privacy of trilogy… I am afraid it will bring traffic and violence to our neighborhood. This resort would permanently alter this community for the worse!  We do not want La Quinta area to become a  “big city” atmosphere where more criminal element invades our quiet peaceful surroundings.  750 short term  rentals will invite disruption to our community as it has others.  There are many other reasons to turn down this  project.  I can only think of one reason to approve it and that is for money!   We do NOT want light pollution, noise pollution nor water being used for this project.  We moved here for  beauty and health benefits of the dark skies ‐ leave La Quinta as it is ‐ don't turn it into a 'never dark at night'  city atmosphere!!!!!!!  Post‐covid full‐time residency has obviously increased, adding to traffic, congestion and light pollution. This ill‐ conceived project will diminish quality of life for everyone. Strongly oppose this development due to noise, light, traffic and water concerns in a residential area. Water consumption, light pollution, noise pollution, short term rentals, traffic For EVERY reason stated above.  For EVERY reason stated above.  It's a bad idea because: too much water wasted; STVRs invite people who are not vested in our community so  they don't care about the neighbors and this project is full on STVRs; light pollution; noise pollution; increased  traffic; and boredom. This proposal is centered around a one trick pony. A surf wave that is the same old surf  wave over and over and over. Once you've done it a few times you'll want something more challenging and  there's none of that at this wave park. It's not like a ski resort where once you master the bunny slope you jump  on the neighboring ski lift to a more challenging slope. No. Here you pack up and go to the ocean for real waves.  Eventually the fad will fade and then look what you're left with. I'm fine with a residential and even light  commercial development here but the wave pool along with the STVRs are a very bad idea. I won't vote for any  city leader who agrees to this project. We need to conserve our water! Waste of water when we are conserving..all the wrong things, traffic, safety, extreme lighting  It's bad business 18 million gallons of water during drought is ridiculous  I agree that this development would negatively impact La Quinta.  I have lived in La Quinta for decades and have  seen a lot of unscrupulous developers come here destroy the environment and then they leave and the terrible  development is here forever.  We are supposed to conserve water because of climate change.  This not only  would be a terrible development in La Quinta, but it would be extremely wasteful.  With 100 golf courses using  millions of gallons of water this would be wasting many more millions of gallons of water for a few privileged  few.  Let the residents and people who live in La Quinta enjoy our peaceful, lovely city and don't destroy it with  a surf park, for greedy developers. The waterpark is not sustainable because 1. California has a water shortage that will likely get worse over the  years due to desertification, and waterparks violate water conservation laws. A waterpark is also not going to  keep people here over the summer, it’s too hot, even for that.   2. The structure will, let’s say 20‐30 years from  now, end up back in the earth only as waste— it’s not a good longterm solution.    A more innovative idea for  the city would be something similar in sustainability to ‘the Highline’ in Manhattan— a 1.45‐mile‐long garden  created on a former elevated Railroad line. Examples include an eco‐friendly park or garden that cultivates  plants and wildlife with canopied walkways to protect people from the shade and structures to house other  innovative projects with wall gardens and solar panels and maybe underground playgrounds (who knows!).      There are brilliant propagative designers and architects, to name a few the ‘greening the desert project’,  ecology‐based architect and genius Ken Yeang who created the bioclimatic skyscraper, Amanda Sturgeon’s  biophillic design— who invest in these additive solutions, and are drowned out by the wealth of jaded men with  outdated ideas, out of touch with public interest and a dying capitalist agenda. Have you asked the people of  We do not need more massive man‐made environments for recreational purposes. The Coachella Valley is itself  a beautiful natural environment that has amazing recreational opportunities. In addition, the valley is a short  ride away from beaches, mountains, State and National Parks, Lakes, etc. These types of superfluous, natural  resource draining projects are harmful to literally all life on earth when you consider them in aggregate. Earth 's  natural resources are finite and have been in a step decline for about 200 years,  coinciding with the human  population explosion (~1 billion in 1804 to ~8 billion today).  All of us need to reexamine and reprioritize our  needs and wants so that we consider how our actions affect the natural world (negative, neutral or positive). This proposed water wasting resort is complete folly.  We are a DESERT and CA has an ongoing drought.   Meanwhile, current residents are expected to reduce their water usage more each year.  This makes no sense!   Very concerned about noise and light pollution, traffic, STVR’s. This proposed development is totally out of  character for the City of LQ and is NOT a positive addition to our lovely community. We, the residents, elected  you to serve our interests, and this proposed development is in NO way in our best interest. Please vote NO.  NO using Valley water  No traffic adding to climate pollution  No noise The area was not zoned for this type of development.  There are numerous reasons to  deny this project to  move forward.  Please consider the following…many short term rentals, water usage, noise level, additional  traffic, 80’ light towers affecting residential community and many more issues to consider.  I urge you to not  allow our quality of life to be compromised and not allow this project to move forward. Thank you. The traffic, tall towers of lights, and the unnecessary use of precious water is so wrong for this peaceful area of  La Quinta!  This is simply irresponsible and ill conceived in light of historic drought conditions which are not expected to  change. Not to mention the excessive noise and traffic. Please do not allow this project to go forward at the  expense of permanently scarring our precious gem of the desert. La Quinta’s character and legacy will be  forever changed for the the worse if this project is allowed to proceed.  I am opposed for all of the same reasons listed in this attached email Wasting water. The valley doesn't need any more traffic, we already have to put up with the road closures and  traffic for the festivals.  We like our quite neighborhoods, peaceful and dark skies at night. We live at the Trilogy at the Polo Club and I can see extreme traffic congestion and the use of 1 million gallons of  water to fill the basin plus maintaining the levels will take water away from our aquifers which will be needed in  the future. This project would ruin quality of living in my neighborhood. I live across the street from proposed Surf Park. I moved to La Quinta from the LA Area to get away from the traffic and noise. I feel it's irresponsible to move  forward with The Wave when California is in the state of severe drought, water restrictions and increase prices  in water.     The lights will change the dark skies that I have enjoyed from moving away from the LA area.      Traffic will increase and you end up having to install traffic lights, changing the beauty and peacefulness to the  community I live in.    What is the ROI the City and the community will receive? When will the community  receive it?  How does the developer expect to find staffing for this development when area businesses are  having a difficulty finding staff for current hotel, restaurants and stores.        I strongly oppose to short term  rentals!  This is a residential community and I don't agree with rezoning the area just to accommodate The  Wave.    Respectfully,  Karen L Thomas  It does not belong in the desert and this location especially. La Quinta La Quinta stop  This Eco disaster. Stop with the greed This water project does not belong in the desert, especially in a residential area. This is not the type of growth  we want or need.  Amusement parks don’t belong in residential neighborhoods. It will affect over all values in a negative way.  Water shortage. Stadium type light affecting our dark skies. Increased noise. Increased traffic. Amusement parks  are not “neighbors”.  There are no positives regarding this project.  The STR issue is a big concern, while the water availability affects  us all.  Not a good idea at a bad time. I feel this is a totally irresponsible use of our water resources. I am from the Fresno area and know first‐hand  many residents of Lemoore who have found the wave park impacted their community in terms of unwanted  traffic and noise. This project is not sustainable just from a cost perspective.   It will hinder the charm of our community and cost  us more in the long run.  Just because we have land doesn’t mean we need to develop it irresponsibly for short  term gain or any gain.     Many come to visit La Quinta because it offers something more serene and quiet,  unlike larger developed areas in the valley.     Additionally, we must consider how many cities across California  and the world for that are running out of water. I experienced this is the lovely city of Mendocino on the  California coast this summer, where there were strict water rations.     Don’t let this mistake be your legacy.      Noise, brite lighting, lack of water in the Desert. It just doesn't make any sense. It’s a waste of water and not open to the general public.  City leaders should be recalled if approved. This is a very quiet residential area.    While recreation is good, a giant wave pool is just not sustainable.  We  have a wave pool (the best) 2 hours away and it’s the ocean. Many of the residents here have their own pools  so I can’t imagine why we would want to go to what is essentially a public pool.  Also a business of that size will  detract from the local , small business vibe of the La Quinta cove area.  There are other areas in La Quinta on the  other side of Highway 111 That can support such a venture.  Sadly the infrastructure of this residential area  really is not suited for a large commercial venture.  Think of the Traffic enhancements needed, our roundabouts  would need to become larger, traffic lights would need to be installed on 4 way 2 lane bidirectional streets.   Parking and parking enforcement would need to be enhanced, energy use for such a small district as IID would  increase dramatically. Short term rentals bring crime, drugs and inflation to a already increasing market.  Not  the best idea here folks! Please consider the homeowners.   The other wave pool is in the middle of nowhere and not surrounded by SFR housing developments with limited  access points. I'm a retired 30+ year surfer who's been to the other Surf Ranch and can't believe they'd even  consider putting one in Coral Mountain.  Inconceivable!  The other wave pool is in the middle of nowhere and not surrounded by SFR housing developments with limited  access points. I'm a retired 30+ year surfer who's been to the other Surf Ranch and can't believe they'd even  consider putting one in Coral Mountain.  Inconceivable!  Not a good idea with the climate change upon us and more tourist and snow birds than we can squeeze in ...  Enough is enough in our valley Absolutely opposed to this Surf Park & Ironman This is a terrible project that will drain a HUGE amount of water from the aquifer which ALL Coachella Valley  residents depend on. It is totally inappropriate in a drought afflicted desert. I don’t want the water park in this town, it’s cost too much water, is causing traffic noise. I want you to know that we are against the proposed Wave Pool. The reason we bought 11 years ago at Trilogy  was because of the quiet and the dark. It resembled our life growing up on the farm. Now the proposed Wave  Pool threatens that serenity. I can tell you without a doubt that the noise will be much more disruptive than the  deceptive developers are portraying. We live in the SW corner of Trilogy (62nd and Madison) up against the  berm and we can easily hear the race car track in Thermal which is over 5 miles away and we weren't supposed  to be able to hear that. We love the fact that there are so few street lights and the ones that do exist have  limitations on their height. And yet you are considering setting all the rules, including STVRs, along with all that  makes La Quinta a great place to live aside just for a few bucks. We tolerate Coachella, Stagecoach, Ironman,  the PGA golf tournament, the tennis tournament, etc because while those events are disruptive to our lifestyle,  they benefit the community and we are only disrupted for a short time. Now you want to shove this Wave Pool  down our throats and force us to deal with it every day. No thank you! Traffic, noise, congestion, ecological impact.   Just put a bucket of water outside and measure the daily change in depth. Multiply the surface area of your  bucket by the surface area of the proposed wave pool. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand  that that development is going to use a lot of water. Yup, I know that many of us have pools and live on golf  courses.  Had we known the water situation of the greater southwest we might have made different choices.  Putting in a multi‐mullion gallon, water dependent, "exclusive" only, project like this, during one of the worst  droughts in history, is incomprehensibly stupid.  As are those trying to push it through. And dangerous.  And  environmentally irresponsible. And completely inconsiderate to ALL the taxpaying residents of La Quinta who  depend on the same water resources that this project will be draining, year after year during global warming.   No "valuable" new jobs will be created either.  They will be minimum wage jobs at best.  Rest assured that there  are thousands & thousands of us living in La Quinta who are very aware that the Schwab family is backing this  project, & are likely "pulling a lot of weight" politically" to push it through for purely selfish financial reasons,  with no thought for the local environment or residents. But no one involved seems to realize that "us thousands  & thousands" who actually LIVE HERE, also have VERY VERY VERY deep pockets financially, & are VERY VERY  opposed to this project.  And we will fight with the same amount of money AND vigor against EVERYONE with  the short sightedness & greed trying to push this project through. Besides all of the above valid reasons, this is an elitist project that provides absolutely nothing for the residents  of La Quinta other than a select few ‐ you know those other taxpayers and voters. The fact that the City would  even consider this project is disappointing. I hope it's because they must, but will listen closely to all residents  and recognize that all these concerns are real and affect everyone in the Valley. Traffic  Excessive noise  Major light pollution   STVR problems   Extreme Water waste  Animal endangerment    Disregard for the master plan    Everything about this proposal is just so wrong.  We are in a terrible drought, what a waste of a precious  resource.  Light pollution,  too many STVR, more traffic and congestion on the streets….Please stop this train  Simply because of how prone to droughts we are this project does not make sense. Secondly, this resort is to  accommodate wealthy foreigners and I’m willing to bet a night at the resort isn’t something people of the  community could afford. Instead of building this, why not relocate the funding to cities further east such as  thermal and mecca. They are underprivileged and this resort would only be for the privileged to enjoy.  Simply because of how prone to droughts we are this project does not make sense. Secondly, this resort is to  accommodate wealthy foreigners and I’m willing to bet a night at the resort isn’t something people of the  community could afford. Instead of building this, why not relocate the funding to cities further east such as  thermal and mecca. They are underprivileged and this resort would only be for the privileged to enjoy.  This projects violates everything that relates to natural and cultural resource protection and conservation. It’s a  shameful play to reduce our water resources by encouraging visitors to pretend they’re at the ocean; visitors  can go to their hotel pools. What in the world are LQ’s mayor, City Council, and Planning Commission members  thinking?! Wave Development is a “foreign,” entity, headquartered in Delaware, with a LA (Wilshire Blvd. yet!)  address!! Really? LQ residents are well aware City management is not interested in what residents think. Did  residents vote on this Wave thing? This is just another example of out‐of‐touch elitists making hideous decisions  that residents do not want!!! Quit commercializing the open space and cheapening the image of our beautiful city.  We want peace and tranquility maintained. Everything about it screams NOT good for our area, the water  resources alone are completely insane & w/o  thought to the future for our children! Let these money grubbing idiots make money elsewhere.  This project  shouldn’t even be a consideration! NO NO NO! Opening up La Quinta to the Waterpark will destroy the night sky preserve and the natural desert feel of the  area that has been a draw for people from around the world. The residents will deal with constant noise,  light  pollution,  traffic and disruption of our right to peaceful existence.  Not to mention California‐ and the world! ‐ is  in the midst of a drought. How does a giant wave park in the California desert seem like a good idea? As a city  we should be emphasizing the amazing allure we have as a desert destination,  not depleting our natural  resources so some out of town rich people can make a buck. It is the responsibility of the city council to protect  and petulant the interests of the residents not developers. Please do the right thing.  I am very worried about the amount of water this will require. Our water bills keep going up! Water is the main issue here aren’t we in a drought? Enormous waste of water in a drought stricken area is irresponsible. The proposed park will be an eyesore and  will devalue our homes and cause numerous problems with traffic, littering, and public safety, escalating crime  We don’t need anything that requires so much water while in a drought. Neither wave park nor golf course.  just more pollution and noise...stop both! Increase in traffic and pollution Awful idea. It will hurt properly values of nearby homes. It will effect the beautiful dark sky.  Use of fresh water  only vs non potable water is a huge risk to our water security. If I lived next to this project I would feel very  betrayed by my city leadership. 👎 1. Noise pollution. 2. Light pollution. 3. Power consumption. 4. Environmental disturbance (wild animals). 5.  Traffic tension. 6. Water supply.  1. Noise pollution. 2. Light pollution. 3. Power consumption. 4. Environmental disturbance (wild animals). 5.  Traffic tension. 6. Water supply.  I love to see my stars at night, to hear the owls and coyotes sing, and enjoy l knowing we will have enough  water for our future here.  Irresponsible development  on so many levels. City counsel seduced by these developers! Water usage should benefit all. I’m against development of a resort like this. A wave pool would is terrible for the environment and water  shortage. I’m also against the development of a resort of this size will cause unsustainable traffic, Disturb the  the beauty and natural surroundings and disrupt the peaceful residential community of La Quinta  Water usage & habitat destruction. Nothing in it for the locals (usage) We have enough traffic here already. This water would be much better used in the salton sea. Don't agree with wasting that amount of water.  One of the biggest reasons we bought our home in La Quinta Cove is to have a peaceful, quiet, refuge from busy  city life and to see the stars! We could not see the stars like this in Los Angeles. When we tell people how  wonderful La Quinta is, we tell them those things and they say awwwww you're so lucky, what a dream! But a  giant tourist trap with giant lights could destroy that peacefulness for us. And all that ‐ not to mention our huge  concern about the drought. We are deeply concerned about this drought. Given drought and water shortages I don't see how rezoning to allow this kind of development works.   We're in a drought. We cannot afford to waste water for the uber wealthy to surf! The wave project will destroy our beautiful night sky, increase traffic and noise. It is not right for the desert. I just think it totally irresponsible to approve this project during a serious drought and in a residential zone. The drought situation for all of California is very concerning.  I just spent $5300.00 to zero scape my front yard. I  don't believe this is a responsible thing for the city to do.  Also I can barely get out of my neighborhood because  of the traffic on Jefferson.  I am on the corner of Jefferson and 50.  There are several things going in on this  corner making it even more busy.  I'm beginning to think La Quinta is going in the wrong direction. Water glut, traffic, light pollution, STRUs, ridiculous project for a DESERT. Waste of water and we don’t need this in our town.  Water usage main concern, additional noise, traffic and congestion will harm the idealistic nature of La Quinta.   I agree that we do not need a development like this in La Quinta.  La Quinta. This idea has nothing to do with  the residents that live here it’s all about more money for the money  hungry corporation that want it in. I love our community and the small town feel. Don’t blow it!!!!! Severe negative environmental impact for  La Quinta and it’s residents.   La Quinta First of all, we are in a drought, why would you want to allow this place that people who live here can't even  enjoy themselves, to be built? Your taking from our drinking water supply and creating havoc everywhere you  turn. Coral Mountain especially is a very sacred area. If children and families could afford to go to this wave pool  maybe it would be different, but it's not and not just anyone can go and enjoy this "wave park". You approve  this whats next? Disneyland?  Not Happy about this resort & what it will do to our property values. La Quinta has a very upscale image & this  proposed resort will absolutely ruin it.     I am categorically against  the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park for a multitude of a reasons.  To begin, it  is irresponsible to rezone our low density, residential communities for a party festival‐like attraction, where  local citizens would not be permitted.  The only enjoyment would be for those that do not even live, work or  sustain our beautiful gem of the desert.        La Quinta has tried to mitigate the excessive, poorly managed, short  term rentals that theaten to destroy our neighborhoods. There is no rational excuse to invite the problems we  are trying to eradicate by adding 750 STVRs.      La Quinta advocates dark skies for stargazing,  preventing even  common, residential street lights. The 17 proposed, 80' mega light structures are truly against that initiative.  The developer's previous demo failed to prove his claim that the lights would be "shielded" to prevent the  nuisance until 10 PM for all those that live in the surrounding area.  No one wants to live next to a stadium of  lights 365 days a year.       This wave park would also bring massive, negative environmental impacts, including  noise pollution from loud speakers, wave making machinery, music and thousands of attendees,  plus traffic  congestion, CO2  emissions, and multiple dangers to our endangered bighorn sheep.          Furthermore, our  blackouts, due to a strained electrical grid, would add to the list of increased future disasters if this wave park  monstrosity was approved.     Most importantly, we are living in a state of eternal drought. The data regarding  the Colorado River, Lake Mead and our aquifer is alarming. We have had to replace grass with desert scape on  our private properties as well as public areas to reduce water waste. We are on a tiered water pricing system to  encourage water conservation.  Significant funds have been spent to utilize non potable water for our  established golf courses. The Coral Mountain Resort wave basin will be filled with 18 MILLION GALLONS OF  DRINKING WATER that would drain our already compromised supply.  Our a 120ﾟ heat would exasperate the  evaporation rate. La Quinta residents would all pay the price of such irresponsibility. Do not put this strain on us!     I am absolutely against  the proposed wave park for a multitude of a reasons. To begin, there is no responsible  reason to rezone our low density, residential communities for a party festival‐like attraction, where local citizens  would not even be allowed.  The only enjoyment would be for those that do not even live, work or sustain our  beautiful gem of the desert.      We have tried to mitigate the excessive, poorly managed, short term rentals that  try to destroy our neighborhoods. There is no rational excuse to invite the problems we are trying to eradicate  by adding 750 STVRs.      La Quinta advocates dark skies for stargazing,  preventing even common, residential  street lights. The 17 proposed, 80' mega light structures are truly against that initiative. The previous demo  disproved the developer's claim that the lights would be "shielded" toprevent the nuisance until 10 PM for all  those that live in the surrounding area.  No one wants to live next to a stadium of lights 365 days a year. This  wave park would bring massive, negative environmental impacts, including noise pollution,  traffic congestion,  CO2  emissions, multiple dangers to our cherished bighorn sheep.   Do not put this strain on us.. Water is a  lifelineWhat makes anyone think hat hat fresh water that we sir that we have had to concern reducing changing  our rasts to desert's gaping throughout our city privately and We are in a drought. I have a home close by and we go there for the quiet solitude away from Los Angeles for  the past 15 years. Once you put this loud park here the area will never be the same. Our property values will  drop. People already don’t want to live near it and it’s not even built. This amusement park for surfing and  concerts should be much farther away from residential homes with better road access for emergency exits to  the freeways. The Coachella Festivals already ruin traffic and noise every weekend the entire month of April in  our residential neighborhoods. Noise levels will be out of control and they are going to be coming from both  sides if they have events during April too. The traffic around the roundabouts are already deadly enough  without the additional traffic. Look at the Amex tournament traffic issues. Next there will be even more street  lighting needed for all the people who are unfamiliar with the area and more traffic accidents. The beach is 2 hours away from us here in the Coachella valley. Anyone can go at no cost to enjoy waves and  free water. We should not give into the greed of money to waste precious resources. We don’t need to light up  our beautiful sky’s with more light and our quiet neighborhoods with excessive noise or more traffic. Let all that  stay in San Diego and in Los Angeles.  Of the myriad concerns I have with this project, the water requirements in an age of drought and increasing  temperatures are grotesquely irresponsible and disrespectful of our desert and its inhabitants. Please reject this  project. Putting this needless and elitist pressure on scarce resources imperils our children for profit.  It demonstrates  callous disregard for average citizens and suggests an abnormal affinity for those who would dance while Rome  burns. Putting this needless and elitist pressure on scarce resources imperils our children for profit.  It demonstrates  callous disregard for average citizens and suggests an abnormal affinity for those who would dance while Rome  burns. Water, traffic, noise, crime, light. Noise, traffic, need for additional police...the reason people move here is for quiet, residential NOT short term  rentals, bars, more music festivals with drugs, etc...thank you The amount of drinking water required for this project is unthinkable. This private wave community is about  making a profit regardless of the cost to the environment.   Vote NO! We are in a serious drought. This is not beneficial to anyone but the developer. It's a waste of precious  resources. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand the irreparable damage this would cause to the area we  Developer is the same one the city used for SilverRock. The city has dumped money into this project for years.  Same Mayor, same developer, even worse project. Cost to taxpayers undetermined. Impact on surrounding  communities will affect housing sales. The mayor and council are destroying La Quinta not preserving it.  Say YES to the wave!!!! Surfing is an incredible sport!!! Great exercise and will bring money to our economy!  Kelly Slater is a incredible businessman! Fair and responsible!  Just like many other people who have moved to the neighborhood is to find peace and solace and I am sure that  this would be the contrary. It would be like living across the street from Disneyland and this is not what I want!  The profligate waste of water in the mega drought conditions across the state and in the Coachella Valley is the  greatest concern I have about this project. This is the wrong time and the wrong locale to construct this project. I hate the idea of reasoning from residential to TOURIST /COMMERCIAL   Who wants to live next to Disneyland!!  I bought way out off of 58th street for the peaceful surroundings and mountain vistas.  This development will  bring traffic, noise and light pollution while bring in the citizens of La Quinta nothing of value in return.  Most  residents will not be able to or desire to surf in the resort! I am concerned and deeply troubled about the traffic, noise, water consumption and unnatural lightening that  this proposed amusement park is going to bring everyday of the year!  WE moved to la Quinta for the peace, the  quiet , the loveliness of this "gem of all cities" in the coachella valley.  If this goes through it will become the  "garbage dump of the coachella valley". Prices of homes will go down and we will certainly move.  Would this  amusement/wave park be better off in a business or casino area.  That would  make more sense.....why punish  us?   Does La Quinta need more money?  Then for goodness sakes I would rather have you raise taxes then have  to move somewhere in the valley for the peace and quiet that we love now and enjoy!   Please please do not let  this happen.    Bruna Gasparini The lot was planned for a private country club golf course and additional high end housing.  This was a major  decision in moving into the area.  Now it will be a huge attraction (think Knott's Berry Farm) for increased traffic  and congestion.  The roads in and out of 58th are not designed for that much traffic. Nothing good can come out of this proposed resort.  If there even needs to be an explanation to anyone on the  City Council as to why it would not be a good thing, therein lies the problem.  Many must be on “the take” if this  does go through and shame on City Council.   Our desert area’s available water is already taxed. Bringing in a project such as this will only stress our water  supply beyond its capabilities. I have spoken with friends from Lemoore, a small Central Valley town where  there is another Slater wave resort. Those citizens were initially excited about the rarity of having a business  such as this, but it quickly turned negative based upon the water facility’s use of water that would normally be  used for farming, along with the noise and crowds associated with events held at the site. We all moved to this area for peace and quiet and serenity. The land where the wave Park is planned to be is  supposed to be zoned low density residential. To change this to tourist commercial would be a travesty for the  neighborhood. The traffic implications, the noise, the constant flow of tourists in and out is unbelievable. When  our city has recently put a stop to all short‐term vacation rentals to be told that this development will have a  special permit to make them 100% vacation rentals is horrifying. Water usage. Lights.  This can only be enjoyed by those with extreme wealth. I would like to see more beautiful natural areas with  trails that all people can enjoy.  Our community mitt has so much wealth let’s not loose track of the natural  beauty which makes this such a special place.  The use of our aquifer water for the enjoyment of others.  1) Additional traffic and traffic noise on Madison Street. has been getting worse as it is.  2) Additional traffic on  Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, 58th, 54th, etc  3) DARK SKY COMMUNITY where we live WILL BE IMPACTED by  lighted sky Only for the rich, will bring more traffic, congestion and stress on our already stressed infrastructure. This project is counter to the La Quinta general plan and a variance for this use should not be allowed.   Mitigation for key elements of the plan have not been shown feasible some of these include 1) Water usage 2)  traffic congestion 3) Electrical power usage 4) Impact on big horn sheep.  Permitting this variance in its proposed  form will create a constant incompatibility between the project and surrounding residents. Please reconsider  this variance and return to the original land use plans First of all, we are in a severe drought. I bet If the Governor knew about this project he’d stop it. We haven’t had  any significant rain here in years. Also, it’s private. No public access. The lighting will kill the no light ordnance  put in place in La Quinta decades ago. How do they get away with that? We have a water park in PS that has  been closed for years. Why not fix that up. And where would the water come from? The Colorado River is in  serious trouble so much so that lake Mead is down 12 ft. And maintaining water in the desert heat, how will  that be done. No! We nor any property in Cali needs a private surf park! Isn’t that what the ocean is for? It is irresponsible to build a development focused on water sports during the current drought conditions.  Until  the water issues with IID, State of CA, and others resolve the area’s long term source and delivery issues, the  development rezoning should be denied. Destructive to the wildlife and traffic considerations. A water park like this is a waste and not beneficial in it’s  location. This is a quiet residential neighborhood, which is why we bought here.  This proposed project will change all  that. Please consider the interests of the thousands of neighboring homeowners and don't change the zoning of  this parcel of land. Thank you. Our water resources being wasted, traffic, noise, and its limited to who will be able to use this park, plus the  amount of water and power it will take to operate this site. We might as well build a ski resort.... Our water resources being wasted, traffic, noise, and its limited to who will be able to use this park, plus the  amount of water and power it will take to operate this site. We might as well build a ski resort.... Environmental impact, our water and the drought we are in, the disruption to the community with little to no  benefit to the community, the congestion and traffic, noise and light pollution, etc. My list goes on I just bought  my house here in La Quinta with the knowledge that the land outside of my gates was zoned for residential use,  not tourist commercial! The draw to this area was the beautiful and quiet nature all around. Also, what happens  if/when this community ends up being a “flop”? Have you not seen the devastation caused by big developers in  down markets? This proposed community is exclusive and for the enjoyment of few but at the expense of many.  It is crazy that this is even being considered. Can’t want to speak to my real estate attorney about this. I wonder  how many new residents are in my same predicament? Or have you not even considered the implications? I  urge you to put a stop to this at once.  My concern is the environmental impact this would have.  We are in a drought. The idea of wasting 18 million  gallons of water so that the uber wealthy can ride a manmade wave is irresponsible.  The water evaporation  rate on a warm day according to the Lemoore wave park is 250,000 gallons of water per day. I would propose a  recall of any council member who would approve this. Deficit of water, detrimental/costly to neighbors, natural environment, night skies, and traffic patterns.  Silliest  idea put forth in a long time, yet money gain for investors and our local leaders appears to take precedent over  all the negatives.   This private water park resort is an egregious use of community water resources. Dark skies are treasured in la  Quinta. This resort fails our town today and for our future. Please vote against this resort.  Increased traffic on Madison will make the use of the two resident gates to PGA West very hard and dangerous  to make left turns off.    Noise from the traffic will degrade the quality of life for those adjacent to Madison.     Increased transients in this purely residential part of La Quinta will cause congestion at shopping areas designed  for residents, not tourists. This will also increase traffic violations such as speeding and littering.    The huge  elevated lamps will destroy our evening sky. Those of us who are amateurs with telescopes will be deprived of a  valued pass‐time.     The capacity of the hotel and residences seems to be around 2500 to 3,000 persons. That is  a population group that will strain emergency services, such as police, first aid, fire and others.  All of the following:  Water, lights, traffic, noise, hotel, VRBO’s.  This is a residential neighborhood, not an area  for an amusement such as this.  We are in a drought and water is precious.  The lights will ruin our “night sky”.   The traffic and noise will ruin our peaceful surroundings. When I bought a home in this location two years ago, it was to get out of the busy and loud Los Angelos scene. I  chose La Quinta over Palm Springs because it was more private, quiet and not touristy. Adding this resort would  be an awful addition to a very peaceful neighborhood. Also, and  probably more important is that we have a  water shortage and in a drought and the amount of water wasted on this ridiculous venture is negligent.we  already have one water park in the valley and adding a second one would impact the environment negatively.  Major environmental concerns. This is outrageous. We have a serious water issue in the state of CA.  Light pollution.  Not in keeping with neighborhood.  Waste of water during long term drought    This primarily a residential area, i.e.  bedroom communities, with a few golf facilities! The traffic, increased  lighting and noise level from such a facility would be horrendous for the community, not to mention the  property values, devaluing them substantially and the same would apply to constructing any form of apartment  Traffic is already getting much worse.  Not to mention lights at night and noise.  Also, the possibility of increased  crime in LaQuinta!  It seems like an easy decision — not in La Quinta or any other residential area, for that  matter. The I‐10 corridor has lots of unused land and would be much easier to access from the freeway.  Please,  don’t make the mistake of negatively impacting our community.  Your actions will never be forgotten.  Needs to be moved to I‐10 corridor.  This does not support the people of this desert. The added congestion to the east valley is not wanted. I have significant concerns about lighting, noise, traffic and the environmental impact of the project.  Not the right project for this area  Too much noise and light pollution   It will bring unwanted traffic to our  neighborhood  Opposed to the lights This is not the place nor time to do this. Please do not ruin our beautiful city with this.   Thank you This is not the place nor time to do this. Please do not ruin own beautiful city with this.   Thank you   I say NO to the park as the plans are presently. There are  many valuable issues  to consider like environment,  water, wildlife, roads, etc.  Not allowing the community in alone will cause problems. If you want more revenue  for the city bring the Salton Sea back to life.  Bringing in ocean water seems a good idea  for  the sea and park.   Put both out there and double the fun, money and help  provide jobs. There’s more space there and it will help  the dust.  It seems the park will contain all the shopping , restaurants etc keeping the members within its walls  not into town.  The Salton Sea with all the recreations it will offer definitely will bring in the money. It did before. I say NO to the park as the plans are presently. There are  many valuable issues  to consider like environment,  water, wildlife, roads, etc.  Not allowing the community in alone will cause problems. If you want more revenue  for the city bring the Salton Sea back to life.  Bringing in ocean water seems a good idea  for  the sea and park.   Put both out there and double the fun, money and help  provide jobs. There’s more space there and it will help  the dust.  It seems the park will contain all the shopping , restaurants etc keeping the members within its walls  not into town.  The Salton Sea with all the recreations it will offer definitely will bring in the money. It did before. It will bring too much traffic…lighting in the desert has always been an issue…NO LIGHTS LET THE STARS SHINE.  We have been in a drought and that continues…so how is the water waste addressed by the city council? And  the Noise….OMG…please check out how loud the wave machine is and how the noise level will carry throughout  our community. Seems like the city council could put that land to better and profitable use. Considering the drought we are in, and have been in for many years, this project and any other water projects is  ludicrous!  I don’t even think we should have all the gold courses and reseeding that we do. We need to  conserve our precious water resources.  The location is too residential and quiet ; this resort and lighting would be detrimental to the lifestyle  experience of the residents. Noise, traffic, lights ‐  Not right for the area.  We do not need more short term rentals. Simply put there is no good reason for this project to go forward.  All of the negatives have been presented time  and again.  The traffic, congestion, disruption to our area; as well as the drain on our precious water supply, at a  time when can least afford it.  We do not need this now or ever. I think the City of La Quinta can find better use of land and a wasteful use of water, noise and increased traffic.   How about a convenient store.  Water shortage   Congestion to communities  Etc   First) Water, Water, Water!!!  Second) Lights, Noise! The City Council is making poor decisions from the invasion of residential communities by STVRs to the  subsidizing of SilverRock and now this land grab for a project that will ultimately fail and become a tax write off  for developers.   We are in need of housing. Quit voting this council back in.  Outrageous water usage, inaccessible for the community,  traffic and light pollution  Water is a precious resource that is in short supply and this wave pool is not a responsible use of our limited  resource.  I am opposed to the rezoning and commercial development at this time of water conservation  save the water for our residents, not the wealthy tourists La Quinta,  Doesn't belong in a valley where there is a drought.  The noise, lights, traffic will be non‐stop.  7 am‐ 10 pm.  Horrible idea. This is unnecessary in these times when water is so precious.  The amount of water to fill the basin and or  maintain the level due to evaporation is appalling. Also huge negative impact from noise, traffic etc to the local  residents in this area. This project will waste a tremendous amount of potable water during a 20 year drought, it will add unnecessary  traffic and noise to the surrounding residential area and the proposal to add large numbers of short term rental  units by rezoning is providing LQ with an "out" from their STR ban. It is unlikely that the multimillion dollar  residential homes will ever be built, because no one in their right mind would want to live in an amusement  park for surfers. At a time when large areas of the world including areas in CA are moving away from excessive night lights due to  their negative impact on wildlife, especially migrating birds and also to human health, La Quinta is moving in the  opposite direction. The impacts of this excessive lighting is well documented and factually accurate.  17 ‐ 80' light poles are too much as seen from the street last night Crowds and traffic with no benefit to permanent residents. Noise and water usage.  Wasting water, increased traffic and noise! ‐ if people want to surf, go to the beach! Wrong project at this time and in this location The biggest issue I have with this craziness of a water park here in the desert makes no sense at all.  We are  being asked to do more with less but yet this does not apply to those with the money.  For many years there has  been an understanding to protect the deserts night sky...that is why we have the dim street lights, but this Party  Time Project would bring in 17 boom lights, so the rules don't apply.  The bottom line is this is a horrible idea for  such an environmentally sensitive area.  Be smart and deny the rezoning.  Thank You Linda Wheat I am not opposed to commercial development.  I own/rent 500,000 Sq ft of Commercial/Industrial office  warehouse space nationwide and the company I founded employs 900 people and occupies all of that space.  As  a former Chair of the Board of municipal and State Chambers of Commerce and their Real Estate Tax  committees, I also understand the desire/need to increase municipal tax revenues by introducing commercial  operations inside city limits.   They provide the municipality with revenue and they don't vote!!     A water park  is the wrong type of development in a residential community.  Given the issues of the current water drought,  idling/plowing under acres of agricultural land associated with the lowering of the sub‐basin aquifer in the  Coachella Valley, merely to make a wave pool for surfing stretches the imagination.  The Coachella Valley and  the municipality must be in desperate for tax revenues!   Build the water park, if you must.  Build it nearer to  major infrastructure that can handle the increased customer traffic and emergency vehicles (there will be  many).   Use up 13 M gallons of drinking water to fill the wave poos if you must.  At least the golf courses use  recycled water.   In addition, locating the water park in the middle of a residential area at least 5 or 6 miles from  I‐10, on the corner of Madison and 58th does not make sense.  Locate it nearer to Thermal Airport the Thermal  Short term rentals   Large tower lights  Many events  365 day operation Short term rentals   Large tower lights  Many events  365 day operation Watch the movie “Keep Squaw True” Although a resident of Colorado I am outraged at the proposed Wave park at Coral Mountain resort. 83% of the  Western States are experiencing drought conditions. California utilizes 15% of the the water available from the  Colorado River. The thought that during these conditions, this water is to be used to create an exclusive  recreational "ocean" in the desert is beyond unreasonable. It is absurdly irresponsible. As a member of a civic  council in my community it is my intention, my responsibility as a concerned citizen to make governmental  agencies and leaders aware of this ridiculous notion regarding the wasteful use of our water supply with the  intent of challenging current laws that entitles California to our vanishing natural resource. wrong location, light and noise pollution, traffic congestion.  This project, as I understand it, only benefits the  wealthy population who are bored with themselves and need distractions, with no regard to others including  wildlife, both animals and vegetation. Traffic, Noise, water usage, and all the others reasons for which we are fighting against this project.  It is  inappropriate to build a huge recreational project in our quiet residential neighborhood. Seniors move here because it's away from noise and clutter.  We moved here and love it like it is because it's  peaceful and quiet.  It's really mostly older people living here.  I was a surfer but I'm now 83, and not interested  in the least. Environmental concerns with too much light at night for night‐hunting animals.  Too much noise, traffic and  bright lights for those of us who moved this far out on purpose for peace, quiet and dark nights where you can  see the stars. NO! We have limited water and with the changing climate the situation will only get worse. Now is not the right time  for this project. A surf park in the desert is a waste of water and resources. Wrong place, wrong time is absolutely correct.  We're in a drought situation people!  Potential for too much  traffic, etc. I’m very concerned about the impact of this unnecessary usage of water. We’re in a drought!! The area impacted is solidly a quiet, residential area. Placing a commercial development of this this type and  magnitude will have a significantly aderse impact on traffic, noise, livability and undoubtedly crime in the area.  WE MOVED TO LA QUINTA AT TRILOGY, FOR PEACE AND QUIET AND REMOTENESS, WITH THE NIGHT SKY. WE  DO NOT ANOTHER DISNEYLAND OR WATER PARK TO DESTROY THE QUIET ENJOYMENT ALONG WITH MORE  TRAFFIC LIGHTS, HIGH LIGHT TOWERS, MASSES OF PEOPLE AND OF COURSE CRIME, BROUGHT TO OUR AREA!!   SINCERELY, RICHARD G. DALE, JD,RESIDENT It's a HUGE waste of water I’m concerned about the 17 80 foot light poles, plus the impact on the wildlife. Also concerned about the  Overuse of water.  Another concern is the noise as well as traffic congestion.  This project does not belong in a  residential area.   Drought is becoming a recurring theme in Southern California, so why on earth would the La Quinta City Council  entertain the idea of a recreational water park that will consume and waste vast quantities of water that are  essential for it's residents continued health and wellbeing.  Not only is this park ill‐advised in this particular  location as it is no where near major transportation arteries, but it will squander a vital resource for our valley.   Will impact my property value.  More traffic and noise and lights shining in our dark sky's Why can't the city of La Quinta act responsibly instead of greedily? Someone needs to stop this foolishness but  everyone wants it to be the other guy. Why not set an example a responsible Civic behavior.  Why can't the city of La Quinta act responsibly instead of greedily? Someone needs to stop this foolishness but  everyone wants it to be the other guy. Why not set an example a responsible Civic behavior.  I have already signed the petition but hope to receive updates and action requests.  There is NO reason to put  an 18 million gallon wave pool in the low desert during a severe drought and increasing global warming and  lessening water supplies.  Zoning should not be changed for this.  The desert is no place for a surf park. The ongoing drought is reason alone to deny this development. The  money could be much better spend on beautifying the desert to attract tourism and support the existing  environment. thanks.  This is an ecosystem nightmare. In an age where we should be considering building corridors for native flora and  fauna we are still allowing strip mining of the desert floor. Did you know the desert topsoil holds more carbon  than the ocean? When you get bulldoze it you realize it. This project is quite excessive and this shows  developers don’t care at all but to make a buck. I don’t see many 40 plus people Flocking to learn how to surf.  So the below 40 demographics are Going to support this financially? Shame to ruin all the desert for a couple  months of Coachella customers. Young people are Coming to the desert for the desert. Are there plans to  relocate the wildlife you will be destirbingnormkeeping any native desert for landscaping or is it another Orange  County landscaper bringing non coachella Valley plants and depleting even more precious water? These  questions really need to be answered to make sense of allowing such a project in this day and age. My first concern is the tremendous waste of drinking water that the Wave will require. Also concerned  regarding the disruption this huge development will bring. People decided to move to this area because is it a  My first concern is the tremendous waste of drinking water that the Wave will require. Also concerned  regarding the disruption this huge development will bring. People decided to move to this area because is it a  This seems to not fit our desert, a wave park in the middle of record drought? Rezoning and mouse and traffic  Rezoning and mouse and traffic  This enormous water park is not a good fit for the desert, especially in this time of extreme drought. This promotes waste of precious resources and irresponsible land use. What a stupid idea.Surely, with Huntington beach, San Diego, Laguna, so close, tourists are going there, not  some dumb hole  in the desert. Really, your city council are donkeys.  Inappropriate use of already stressed water reserves, excessive noise and traffic, light pollution, and harm to  surroundings residents who bought their homes in good faith that the land would remain zoned for residential  This neighborhood is not set up for this kind of resort. Many retired people that live here worked long and hard  for many years to live in a beautiful quiet place like this  don’t want it taken away from them. We are in a major  drought. The streets here will not be able to handle the traffic. We need more open space and less water use. This proposed project does not accomplish either of those things.  Concern for wildlife survival. Increase of traffic and water usage.   Wrong thing to have in a dessert! Noise, Crowds, Traffic, Water resources from aquafer depletion, damage to environment and species. Traffic congestion  Water shortage concerns The wave park is a big water and energy user.  We are not in a position to be wasteful anymore.  Water and  energy are going to be too scarce.    Surfers have plenty of free waves to surf on in California.  The desert is not  a location for surfers. I live in Trilogy because it is in a quiet residential area. I don’t want to live near a commercial development and  have the quiet desert environment destroyed by traffic congestion, noise pollution and light pollution. In  addition, it would be criminal to use the underground aquifer to fill a resort’s wave pool.  To allow rezoning of  this property would be reprehensible on the part of the City of La Quinta. I live in Trilogy because it is in a quiet residential area. I don’t want to live near a commercial development and  have the quiet desert environment destroyed by traffic congestion, noise pollution and light pollution. In  addition, it would be criminal to use the underground aquifer to fill a resort’s wave pool.  To allow rezoning of  this property would be reprehensible on the part of the City of La Quinta. We just purchased our home in Trilogy, La Quinta because of the tranquil location.  We are proud to reside in  the city of La Quinta because of way it is set apart from other local cities being ran by a great city council who  we thought want to preserve the integrity of the city.  This is not a project that reflects what La Quinta is all  We purchased our home at Andalusia with the understanding that the Coral Mountain area would be developed  as a residential community. We would never have purchased if we knew it was going to become a commercial  attraction that will forever change this part of LA Quinta with more traffic, noise and light pollution.  We purchased our home at Andalusia with the understanding that the Coral Mountain area would be developed  as a residential community. We would never have purchased if we knew it was going to become a commercial  attraction that will forever change this part of LA Quinta with more traffic, noise and light pollution.  I moved to La Quinta this year in the Trilogy development at Madison and 60th Street.  I specifically chose to live  in this area because it is away from the city center and is not densely populated.  If the Wave Park, hotels and  short term rentals are built on the land adjacent to my development, the high amount of traffic and people  visiting the park will completely alter what I love so much about this area ‐ quiet, little to no traffic, and low light  and noise pollution.  The proposed land area is not the right place for this park and the developer should not be  granted approval to build businesses (including a water park and hotels, as well as short term rentals).  The land,  which is completely surrounded by residential areas and the mountains, is tucked deep into La Quinta at the  base of Madison Street which is at least 10 miles from I‐10.  A park of this type, which is purported to be  appealing to day trippers, should be built closer to the freeway within a more densely populated area of the  Coachella Valley to provide visitors easier access.  The area surrounding the proposed water park is quiet and  low‐density, and zoning the land located right in the middle of a residential community to including hotels, short  term rentals and a water park will transform this beautiful area of La Quinta into just another highly‐populated  area equivalent to what is north of the 111 with no charm or appeal.  Please, please don't allow this area to  become a Water Park with hotels, businesses and short term rentals. La Quinta La Quinta Water is far too precious to be wasted like this. Shameful!! This project does not match the current uses in the area.  This is a purely residential area and is in no way  compatible with a large amusement park facility. We purchased our home in this area of La Quinta because it is so quiet and tranquil.  Putting this enormous  wave park in a residential part of the City seems ludicrous.  If the City wants to put entertainment, it should be  located in more commercial areas of the City with closer access to transportation, freeways and tourist  COmpletely wrong project for this area Burden on traffic. Noise pollution. Not the right setting for a venue such as this. DRASTIC Water shortage. Will  chase wildlife from their homes and the list goes on.   All of the concerns stated in this saynotothewave.com are extremely important and valid issues. Perhaps most  important is the adverse environmental impact and water useage being proposed during the worst draught in  decades or on record and this would be a totally irresponsible use of water.  This doesn't fit the community at large profile.  We already have StageCoach, Coachella and Iron Man that  impacts the lifestyle of residents that live here.  I am also hugely concerned about the noise impact.  It is quiet  here, you can here the firing range when active, boucing off the mountains.  I lived in San Diego from my surfing  experience, I'd rather drive to the Ocean than to a Surf park that has recycled water. It is a hugh drain on water resources and a pollution on all levels. I grew up in California and spent two of my four undergraduate years at UCSD.  I have relatives in the area and  while I love California (I live in North Carolina now) every time I come back the quality of life has degraded a  little.  The last time we were in North San Diego was 2017 and the traffic at ALL times of day near La Quinta was  horrific.  Plus, water conservation is becoming increasingly important.  Finally, the San Diego area already has  the ocean and that works for surfing just fine...please don't turn La Quinta into a variation on a theme that you  expect in Las Vegas (Mandalay Bay has a man made surf pool)..La Quinta is attractive and desirable as is.  Please  do not let this happen.   I have many concerns about this proposed resort.  Number one is the impact on both noise and traffic.  Number  two is the impact on water consumption.  Number four is the environmental impact this will have on the myriad  of assorted wildlife and plant‐life.   Finally, we are a small bedroom community whose life will be forever  changed in such a negative, irreversible way by this project.  Please do not ignore the detrimental impact this  will have on the citizens of LaQuinta.  The current LaQuinta City Council was elected in good faith by YOUR  citizens!!!  PLEASE DENY THE REZONING APPLICATION FOR THIS PROJECT!!!  I believe this project is a great waste of our precious water resources, especially as our Community faces water  scarcity and climate change. Preserve the privacy as wild life.  This project would put stress on our already limited water supply. It disrupts the natural environment not only in  terms of water but also in obstructing land reserved for animal species. We should not put ourselves or our eco‐ systems in a bad spot just for a new resort. What benefits does it have for the actual citizens in the area? It only  puts more strain on our resources which will only become more endangered due to the climate crisis. This  should not be our priority. This will waste so much water and create too much traffic. There’s no need for a wave pool this size when one is  being built in Palm Springs already. We already have plenty of resorts, and if anything we need more affordable  housing not homes in excess of $2.5 million. I gravely concerned about the domestic water use associated with this project, especially with drought  conditions continuing with no apparent end in sight. In addition, this project will disrupt the surrounding  community with noise, lights at night, and traffic associated with Special Events. The Draft Environmental  Impact Report paid for by the Developer is inadequate. Please retain the current zoning and say no to this  This should not be an option in a time like this considering the fact that we’re in an extreme mega drought.  It is not environmentally sustainable to have a beach in the desert. The proposed resort will solely benefit the  wealthy of the valley, while the marginalized are neglected. Please use your financial resources more  responsibly for the entire community. Using water like this is just irresponsible considering that we are in a desert, in a drought, and in a pandemic.  Now is not the time to waste our resources and add to the destruction of our environment for the benefit of  rich people who want a getaway. if you want waves go to the beach. The animals that will be displaced need to  be protected we need our water to be protected. On top of it all the light pollution will get rid of our wonderful  desert view of the stars.  Using extreme amounts of drinking water for a wave pool is not okay especially when it’s going to be used to  advance only a private organization like the Coral Mountain Resort.  The water usage seems absurd given California’s current climate and the fact that it’s an exclusive club is  unsettling as local residents may not be able to even afford a membership. I am concerned for those members in the community that have built there lives in the valley and rely on the  aquifer to give them water.  I am concerned about the environmental impact a project like this would cause on not only the Coachella valley,  but in the name of climate change in general. Lets build a desert scape golf course at the end of Santa Monica Pier, just for a few eleit to use....   What a waste  of water! The ocean is 2 hours west to surf at.   I may not be a resident of La Quinta but as a socal native and someone who enjoys the natural beauty of the  desert, this project angers me especially because of the water shortage. Such a project will further threaten  water shortages and even create racial disparities between who has access to the water and who doesn’t. Such  a project may even force residents to conserve water while such a facility (mainly for the upper middle class and  above) will not have to abide by water rationing. All in all this project should not have even been considered in  the first place due to the climate‐change exasperated water shortage/drought Its only beneficial for rich people in the valley. Horrible for overall business in in valley  No. Just no. This is not what the desert needs in these trying times.  This project is not only a waste of our resources, but this will negatively impact our environment within the  valley. I was born and raised in the valley and I want to see it prosper. Apart from the negative environmental  impact, this is a private organization that will be used primarily by the wealthy groups and tourists. During one  of the worst droughts, this will do nothing but waste our resources. Please do not allow this. Our youth are  depending on it. I just graduated from UC Irvine  and I want to do everything that I can to give back to this valley  and this is something that is very important to say no to.  This project will only worsen our water crisis and negatively impact our local environment; that being, between  those who are most socioeconomically disadvantaged and the wildlife.  This project represents an enormous waste of our valleys resources. At a time when our leaders should be  seeking out ways to conserve water this project threatens to divert precious drinking water away from farms  and residents to the wealthy few who would have access to this wave pool. Please oppose this project to  conserve water for future generations to come.  Drought, animal habitat, traffic, increase in rent for homes. This is only beneficial to the wealthy  Misuse of pristine mountain location  No  Place for a carnival This Wave resort absolutely does NOT belong in a residential area.  There are many reasons why including the  fact that has been zoned correctly for a reason! Do not let this area become another   Silver Rock or any of the  other started and failed messes that were wrongly approved.  This a neighborhood!  This not a proper  amusement park location.  Please don't allow our neighborhood become a place we don't want to live in.   Biggest concern is the noise and crowds Noise, pollution, traffic, transient people, and Water Shortage. This type of park w/ the number of rentals doesn’t fit the LaQuinta family lifestyle  Traffic will be congested ‐ imagine festival time  wave park? Desert?Drought????  Noise We are a community of retirees, many of whom have health issues.  The traffic, noise, lights and general chaos  that the park will create along with their use of water is most upsetting.  18 million gallons of water when we are in a drought..ridiculous!!! I don’t want to see the added traffic nor do I think this is a responsible project to undertake when California is in  the middle of record drought conditions.  It's a ridiculous proposal and will make La Quinta like amusement park. Traffic...aren't we in a drought?? The proposed rezoning is unreasonable under any interpretation of law.  The proposed development would be  environmentally insensitive, greatly increase use of our precious water and is completely inconsistent with the  LQ Master Plan. 1.Water consumption.  2.Noise pollution.  3.incompatability with all La Quinta has to offer. This is the desert. Water is precious and not to be used for the pleasure of the few. I see no benefit for the local  residents of La Quint  Traffic on Madison It is inconceivable to me that you are even considering this travesty. It will destroy the peace and tranquility of  existing residents, and, most notably, we are in the midst of a DROUGHT!!! La Quinta noise and human pollution environmental and eco disaster in the making.  This in not an area for a  commercial water park of any kind. We’re 2 hours from the ocean, go surf there.  Go to the beach if you want to surf! Don’t use up our water.. I am deeply concerned about the environmental impact. 18 million gallons of water.....we are in a drought...we live in the desert....ridiculous South La Quinta is a residential area. We purchase our home here 5 years ago because it was quiet, open, little  traffic and no commercial areas.  The wave and STVR’s will undo the peacefulness of our community.  Light and  noise polllution as well as excess traffic will change the environment ‐ no longer residential zoning but then  commercial which may open to even more noise and traffic. Facing a drought we should NOT approve this proposed resort. This will be an environmental hazard for wildlife and will bring noise and light pollution to a residential area.  Simple. Wrong concept, wrong venue, for this residential and fragile location.  La Quinta noise pollution light pollution and people pollution waste of water and A body of water that size will  drastically change our ecosystem in this little corner of the valley that is like a bowl of sound and life.. A project  like this would change the future of our peaceful and quiet neighborhood full of wildlife. Say no to wave parks in  the desert… I'm concerned about the noise and additional traffic in the area. This project will bring devastating water losses to the community not to mention absorb traffic to the  surrounding communities.  The lights that will be needed to power this park will destroy natural inhabitants.   The noise that will result from this monstrosity will disrupt local residents as well as natural inhabitants. I am concerned with the traffic and environmental implications of building such a large community. With surf  events thousands of people in will come and already is so much congestion in our area with Stagecoach and  Coachella music festival‘s. The Wave Park will create chaos, noise, lighting and anger to local residents. Save the water for all of us, not a  Water!!! Using the developer's own figures, this wave park will pull about 856,000 gallons a DAY from the CVWD once in  operation ‐‐ in addition to the 18,000,000 gallons it will require during construction. This is entirely  unsustainable in a desert that gets about 6 inches of precipitation a year. The CVWD, on its website, already  says "... our groundwater levels are declining..." and that it gets almost all of its water from the aquifer. Now,  imagine what would happen if this project is approved.  I think it will create lots of noise and light pollution and use way too much water which is already a scarce  commodity. Wave pools are also planned for Thermal and Palm Desert, and the water park in Palm Springs is  being converted into a giant wave pool, so the Valley really doesn’t need another one smack in the middle of  retirement communities. The proposed resort is not in keeping with the residential vibe we seek when buying a home here. Too wild a  development & way too transitory people. This is better suited to Hwy 111 surrounding area not PGA West! The proposed resort is not in keeping with the If we were somewhere else, I'd love this project.  However, in California, where we have ongoing droughts, this  project is totally irresponsible.  It's bad enough that every house in the desert has a swimming pool while there  is also a pool in the center of their development.  Also irresponsible.  Water is precious and we can't live without  it.  Let's not waste it!  I am concerned about the misuse of valuable water resources. This is not appropriate and is completely tone  deaf to the needs of Coachella Valley residents. There are enough tourist attractions, enough country clubs,  enough wasted water on grassy areas such as golf courses. We DO NOT want this. We NEED our residents to be  the focus, NOT tourists.  This sounds like a total nightmare with the potential to ruin the area forever. We already get enough traffic,  noise, and disruption of peace with the Polo Ground festivals and snowbird/tourists during the nice weather  months. We need less come‐and‐go and more sustainable, long‐term thinking for the well‐being of year‐round,  mainstay residents who are the backbone of the economy and life in the area. Let’s protect our water supply  and peace and say no to out‐of‐state, for‐profit developers who don’t have our best interests at heart at all and  would reap a profit without any concern for the impact on our home region.  The area in question was originally zoned low density residential/golf for a reason. And it is for these reasons  that many of us chose to move to La Quinta and purchases homes in this area. The master plan for the City of La  Quinta should be respected and upheld. Changing the zoning at the request of a developer could turn out to be  another disaster like the one La Quinta is already dealing with at SilverRock Resort. Furthermore, the proposed  development will invite transient people into the area, similar to what we get during Coachella, but on a never‐ ending basis. The proposed development will attract people who have no pride of ownership or sense of  responsibility for the area, which will lead to all kinds of problems. Again, just like the two weeks of Coachella.  With people looking to move into this area to get away from large cities, this area of La Quinta has become very  desirable, as evidenced by the increase in home values. It would be more prudent for the City to find a  developer who will adhere to the current zoning and develop a residential community. That will lead to more  tax revenue for the City, and more retail revenue for its struggling business owners, on a sustained basis. Traffic, noise does not fit in with the neighborhood.  We will be directly affected by this development as we are across the road ‐ our backyard will face it and we do  not want the light pollution at night ruining the view we have enjoyed for 10 years.  We also do not want the  noise pollution. Very high noice, traffic and general disturbance concerns for our quiet community.  Zoning for golf course  should be upheld!  A water/surf park in the midst of a growing drought in the desert???  Really??? concern over changing the residential neighborhood. Noise abatement. Crowds, traffic. Bad use for water  supply. Bad optics in drought area. The water impact is terrible. The size and location of this resort is all wrong. As a resident of La Quinta I am  firmly against the Wave Pool development.  Go to the beach if you want to surf! I’m concerned about the constant noise even after construction. This is not the right location for a project like  1‐should be open to the LQ residents only  2‐should shut done all service @8pm  3‐LQ residents should be given  discounted access  The beauty of this valley is the smaller population and the no stress from large crowds of people. The usage of  water could be served in a beneficial way for the community. This is a bad idea on so many levels. We have a water crisis on our hands. Not just the desert but the whole  western United States. This must be stopped. This is the desert….surf at the beach.  Leave our aquifer alone. We are in a drought and don't need another surf park we already have one in PS! We are in a record drought, and this is not necessary for the valley or the la quinta community .. be real please  We do not need to be wasting water! It is not appropriate for the existing lifestyle of the people living here.  Also, not a good use of water in this area. We shouldn’t be adding things to worsen the drought. There’s already so much water wasted on all of our golf  courses, we don’t need another water waster.  Not good for the community. Waste of precious water!!! excess traffic and too many proposed events The negative sound and traffic impact could have been avoided had this been planned in a commercially zoned  area. No properties would have suffered or lives of so many elders negatively affected. So much land is available  near existing businesses there is no excuse to harm so many people who cannot rebuild a lifetime of savings. If the info you provided is correct, the noise level alone would be totally disruptive to humans and wildlife.   The concern for us is water.      The light and noise pollution heavily take away from the reason I live in the area to begin with. I’m all for  developing the area, but not for something that doesn’t contribute to the residents. Also, the amount of water  raises a huge concern, especially with water limitations in our state to begin with. It seems very wasteful. Also  the properties all being allowed to have STRs makes me feel concerned about the safety of the area. There are  amazing things in the valley and other growth opportunities. I don’t find that this development will add to type  of environment that the residents love about the area.  I moved to this location to get away from all the noise and traffic. Now there putting in my back yard. How sad  for all the home owners out here. Zoning is for a purpose.  People need to know that when they committ to a lifestyle baised on the enviroment,  The Zoning will protect their future..... Please don't let this happen! This proposed project is in conflict with our community lifestyle.  Nobody should be alloud to have that much  precious drinking water to stuff their pockets with money.  noise, traffic, lighting...this is a residential neighborhood and should remain the same...please don't change the  zoning..there is no need for this type of development... Chronic drought conditions, unproven wave machine technology, loose environmental and habitat studies  doom this wave park idea. There will be 2 or 3 other sites in other Coachella Valley communities commited to  this trendy, "me too" marketing approach.  Able to forecast vast empty parking  lots surrounding an outsized,  noisy, unsustainable machine in our midst. No thank you.  We are in a water shortage which has not end in sight.  Water in the aquafer's are for residents in all of the  Coachella valley residents and we cannot afford to use this water for a commercial project.  In addition the light,  noise, traffic and trash pollution should not be put in the lap of existing residents.   We do not need any additional noise or traffic in the area.   Noise A young transient (short term rentals) party atmosphere development in the middle of multiple higher end  retirement developments is poor planning at best.  There will be constant conflict and complaints. No to Coral Mountain resort!  Would impact our community, more noise, traffic etc.  It would be like Coachella   Festival all the time. No to Coral Mountain resort!  Would impact our community, more noise, traffic etc.  It would be like Coachella   Festival all the time. Traffic!!!!! This is a totally bad idea in every respect.  There would be a tremendous increase in traffic to the area, and it  would definitely create a huge increase in water usage in an area that already has a water shortage.  We bought  in PGA WEST to live in a fairly quiet and peaceful neighborhood.  We strongly object to a project of this nature  being built in our neighborhood.  If we had wanted to live in an area with lots of transient people we would have  moved to a hotel. We must not let this project take over our peaceful communities.  There would be no way we could live with  this nightmare.  It would be like the Coachella events lasting 365 days a year. Fresh Water is a precious commodity on the planet.  We can’t waste it on senseless projects like this!  Especially  in the desert!  Noise level, traffic, waste of our water supply.  This will ruin our quite community.  Worked very hard to be able to retire  in quit place togeather with many more seniors. We thought we deserve  a place to call home with no noise, traffic, drunken parties, unable to sleep under 80 feet powerful lights, loud  speaker radios. Please help. This project is so wrong on so many levels it baffles me why the city is even considering it. Would the possibility  of tax dollars be more important than protecting thousands of residents peace and serenity? We knew what the  zoning was for this parcel when we bought in trilogy. Please don’t change the zoning for this project that has no  business whatsoever being in our residential neighborhood. I was a union construction worker for 35 years. We  built from San Diego to Sacramento. All we did was class A construction. Never ever ever did we intrude upon  people’s lives with our projects like this would do here. It’s just awful.   Not responsible water use in consideration if climate change — increased traffic.  Would prefer a high end hotel  with golf and pool /spa amenities in stead  I learned to Surf years ago, in Hawaii when I was eleven. I was an avid surfer all the while I lived in Hawaii and  California.  There is mile after mile of surf able coastline on California's Coast.  Why would any sane surfer leave  the Ocean, and come to the Desert to pay to surf on fake waves?  I am now 84 years old and all my neighbors  are around the same age.  I don't want our neighborhood to become a circus of crowds, traffic, noise (especially  at night), Graffiti, and crime all in the name of PROFIT for those who care less what we think.  Your concerned  neighbor, Robin Probst Cocerned about traffic and noise Noise and traffic disruprion.  It wsill be a nightmare for those living near this monstrosity. We have in Trilogy for almost 17 years, and I did not move here to have an amusement park next door. At that  time, and until quite recently, it was zoned for housing and golf. This zoning change will ruin our quiet way of  life, and destroy, at least to some extent, our great community. We call upon the City Council to act responsibly  and STOP this project.  Residents in the local area will lose tremendous amounts of value to their home.  We will not even be able to  get to the grocery store or pharmacy without going the wrong way first. This is not acceptable.  I am concerned about the noise, increased use of our water resources, level of increased traffic, bright lighting  and general disruption this project will bring to our tranquil environment.  It can only have a very negative effect  on our lifestyle! I am concerned about the noise, increased use of our water resources, level of increased traffic, bright lighting  and general disruption this project will bring to our tranquil environment.  It can only totally change our lifestyle  for the worse! A wave park is an obnoxious intrusion on the quiet understated ambiance of the La Quinta Desert landscape.   The misuse of our precious drinking water supply is unconscionable. I am concerned about water waste, traffic and congestion, noise and lights at night. Why spoil the beauty of our  city for the fun of a few entitled wealthy people? La Quinta should not have noisy, high traffic water parks. Taking away our drinking water; it is a viable resource in the desert for survival and to waste it on a wave pool  seems ridiculous! We moved here for the quiet and beauty of the area.  This is the wrong project for this area.  The existing zoning  should stay intact. Water, traffic, incompatibility  Noise, pollution, lights at night, and traffic will all increase and change the area from a desirable place to live, to  a place to avoid. Noise, traffic This project would change to whole environment near our community, with increased traffic, noise and  disruption of our daily life.  We are strongly against this project! This will cause more traffic and a more amusement park atmosphere to our Lovely La Quinta. And an  environmental mess scenic beautiful area of Coral mountains should be earmarked for preservation ;but definitely not a high traffic,  water wasting wave pool enterprise.  It appears to be but another effort to build a tax base at the cost of quality  of life and desecration of natural beauty and natural resources. Another example to create a scar on a place of  pristine beauty and an opportunity to advance in the wrong direction of more and more uncontrolled growth  and development and expansion of the greed for money and cheap stimulus entertainment.  Absolutely absurd  concept with constant draughts and water shortages to entertain such a project....someone should be truly  ashamed and show leadership and stewardship for the environment and the future of our desert.  Since this will be a private resort all the residents of La Quinta will be subjected to the traffic and noise.This  huge reasoning project will change the landscape of the housing in that area. Plus non members receive nothing  in return for this big land development. No! Studied geology, geography and earth science in college.    Most important I'm very familiar with the past  recorded data of Rocky Mountain Snow fall... that is what feeds the Colorado River systems and how as a  consumer state we purchase Coachella Valley water.  Further the Sierra Nevada snow pack provides our  watershed as another water resource.  In no way can we squander these precious resources on wave pools for  the wealthy....    80' towers for what....    What's next special license for Trophy hunting our Bighorn Sheep when  the rich and famous are tired of surfing? Studied geology, geography and earth science in college.    Most important I'm very familiar with the past  recorded data of Rocky Mountain Snow fall... that is what feeds the Colorado River systems and how as a  consumer state we purchase Coachella Valley water.  Further the Sierra Nevada snow pack provides our  watershed as another water resource.  In no way can we squander these precious resources on wave pools for  the wealthy....    80' towers for what....    What's next special license for Trophy hunting our Bighorn Sheep when  the rich and famous are tired of surfing? More info please I moved to this particular area of La Quinta for the peace and solitude after living in New York, London and Hong  Kong. The only thing I see from my patio is the golf course and mountains — no houses or roads. The only thing I  hear are birds, dogs, lawnmowers and the occasional coyote. The proposed wave park & its lights would be  visible from my house. The music would be heard from my patio. This would severely affect my quality of life.  Please don’t allow this monstrosity to be built! It will deplete our water supply in the middle of a record‐ breaking drought and forever ruin the gorgeous landscape.  I'm not against change and future development, but your argument about bad timing really resonated with  me... especially the (lack of) water issue. La Quinta’s  reputation has continued to grow as a Superior Quality town to visit and live in. This ridiculous  proposal does not sync with a high quality community  like ours. By even considering this I’m afraid you are not  a very intelligent or maybe a corrupt board member and will dig into your decision at the time for your  individual re‐election.  Incongruent with the current zoning and atmosphere of LaQuinta, not to mention the adverse impact on the  environment.  Wrong place for this type of amusement center.   If there is in fact a water shortage, there is no way you can approve this project.  We already have too many short term vacationers coming to LaQuinta and changing the nature of the  community.  Our neighborhood is entirely different than it was when we bought twenty years ago.  It is constant  partying, noise and disrespect for neighbors and the formerly peaceful environment.  Coachella and Stagecoach  are bad enough.  Don’t add to the problem. The more I read the less I like this idea.  Water is a problem for the desert and a wave park does not seem to be  the best use of it.  I live very close to the site and would not welcome the impact to the neighborhood. Waist of much needed Water in All Coachella Valley.   The many drawbacks of this project have been perfectly outlined by the LQRRD.  How anyone can even consider  constructing a wave park during an ongoing drought, is unfathomable to me.  Wake up.  This is an all‐around  losing proposition. This Project is a square peg in a round hole.  It does not fit as it would require the "injection" of this tourist  commercial zoned Project amongst existing quiet residential communities. This rezoning proposal is not in  keeping with the city's own 2035 General Plan. We are in the the midst of a mega drought with no end in sight.   Please keep this area zoned low density and develop responsibly taking into account all potential impacts. Why is these projects being proposed in our communities.    You are making La Quinta in to a Disney Land. This  will destroy the very reason most of us moved here. This is an irresponsible act on the part of La Quinta Council.   Wrong project for our City and the environment!  We barely have enough water for our community! Since we are in the middle of a MEGA DROUT!!  It makes NO SENSE  to have a Wave Pool here.  Please make the  right decision and vote NO for people in La Quinta who voted for you.  Thank you I am absolutely opposed to any re‐zoning efforts attempted by the city council, particularly from existing  residential to commercial. I do agree with the fact that this development does not belong there; not to mention  the current drought situation we are in. Concerned about increased traffic on Madison and wasting our drinking water to fill the wave park.  Drought and climate changes mandate proactive community water use and management. This wave resort an  example of private resorts consuming ostentatious amounts of public water.  There is no valid reason to change the zoning on this property. It is in direct conflict with the existing  surrounding residential neighborhoods and does nothing to enhance the livability of La Quinta. Please continue  to serve the interests of the people you represent not the interest of outsiders who look only to profit  monetarily and will negatively impact people who bought here in good faith that we could expect future  development to be compatible with the existing area based on the City of La Quinta’s codes and zoning. Please  vote NO ON PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY TO TOURIST COMMERCIAL! Thank you  There is no valid reason to change the zoning on this property. It is in direct conflict with the existing  surrounding residential neighborhoods and does nothing to enhance the livability of La Quinta. Please continue  to serve the interests of the people you represent not the interest of outsiders who look only to profit  monetarily and will negatively impact people who bought here in good faith that we could expect future  development to be compatible with the existing area based on the City of La Quinta’s codes and zoning. Please  vote NO ON PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY TO TOURIST COMMERCIAL! Thank you  1. We are in the midst of a drought.  2. It is beautiful open space.  3. Noise and traffic impacts   This land was not meant to be used for commercial zoning for a water park so close to private communities. It  would be very disruptive and devastating for our community.  We are already in the midst of a climate crisis.  Please keep the peace of La Quinta.  We moved here for that.  The precious aquifer is limited and cannot in  good conscience be used for this.  This water park proposal is not wisely  thought out. Sounds like it is only to benefit the group building it. It won’t be a plus to the community. I think there are  enough rentals in the area already.  Water usage and shortage thereof, is my main concern for the future of our community. We bought out here because of the residential zoning.  It assured us of quiet and low traffic flow.  Plunking this  down in the middle of residential zoning and changing the city zoning plan to accommodate it is just wrong.   All of the impacts to our community would be extremely negative. Resources are already very limited and this  would only add strain and further cripple if not crumble our community.  In addition all of our roads are  extremely deteriorated and once again this would make road conditions worse. We recently purchased our home in La Quinta for the specific reason that it is a peaceful and quiet community  with little to no traffic. Building this resort would bring noise and traffic, and disruption to our communities.  The current water quality in the lower Coachella Valley is not adequate for this vast project.  Most of the  drinking water comes from north of highway 111.  This project will put a strain on the aquifer.    1) this is a tranquil residential area that should remain as such.  2) given the current and likely future drought  conditions any new developments such as this are irresponsible.   Water usage. Crowds in area Why would anyone with a brain want this despicable proposal to go through? Greed over the survival of life as  we know it in our lovely town is at stake here. God help us all with this kind of thinking by our elected officials.   We must all make waves now to stop any of this from happening.   too much water use in an already water depressed area; too much disruption to the land and nature; too much  added traffic and people to the area; The project should not be in a residential neighborhood. It would cause noise & light pollution. The desert  climate is not ideal considering the drought we are experiencing. This project does not look to be in the best interest of the residents of La Quinta.   It’s impact on traffic, noise,  construction and environment is out of character with the neighborhood environment.   This is not the area for  this type of project.   Thank you.  this proposal is disgusting. It is gross. It is an environmental NIGHTMARE for all of the Coachella Valley residents.  With  scarce and dwindling fresh water   supplies, La Quinta and the entire Coachella Valley will face the same  fate as the failed Salton Sea resorts, but on a faster timeline. Boondoggle.      I can’t expound any better than what has been shown on your site. I live in Palm Desert but am in LaQuinta  frequently every week and would never want to see traffic congestion, lack of respect for our oloeacefyl  environment, and horrible bright lights. The tennis garden is bad enough. No more of this…..ever. Doesn’t fit a residential neighborhood  Doesn’t fit a residential neighborhood  This really doesn't fit with the location which is otherwise a quiet and dark at night residential community. I think this project is irresponsible and could leave LQ residents in bad shape in a few years. We’re already in a  severe water drought, why exacerbate the problem? Not to mention, more housing for the ultra rich? Why not  make housing & recreational parks that can be used by average coachella valley residents and not just the ultra  rich? Our local environment cannot possibly sustain the added strain on our water source as we have been under  water use reduction due to drought. Local residents do not want the increased traffic, noise, and problems that  STVR inherently bring, the lack of common sense that party lifestyles ensue, the added crime that statistically  results, the litter, the pollution, the loss of tranquility near the mountains protecting our wildlife and the  overwhelming public nuisance that such an expansive development produces. This development is not for the  local residents. It is reserved for the elite that can afford the astronomical costs and does not bring enough  financial incentive to our local economy to diminish all of problems it ushers in. My main concern is the water issue.  We are looking at very serious times ahead regarding this drought. It just  doesn’t make sense La Quinta Noise, traffic, light pollution, and this project will use too much of our precious water. Think of your  children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren. Please no. Do what you know is the right thing for the  community and our critical water supply. Global warming is upon us. Do not acerbate the problem. Be a solution  Has IID signed off on this project? I adamantly oppose this development based upon severe  drought conditions, and the points listed.  I agree totally with all sentiments that are outlined in opposing this development.    Too high of density project for this beautiful area Too high density for this beautiful area We can only hope Council would not consider a wave pool and more STVR's near PGA West.  We have so much  disruption curing Coachella concerts, we certainly do not want more noise and traffic and certainly no more  STVR's.  Please do not approve the rezoning request! La Quinta this is a horrible idea   ‐drought  ‐energy shortage   ‐traffic  ‐24/7 spring break type partying  ‐stvr bring  crime & noise   ‐ destroys our beautiful desert Mountain View   ‐ no more peaceful golf communities  This project is totally unacceptable considering the state of climate change occurring here in the Coachella  Valley, the entire southwestern U.S., and indeed, the world. Noise & traffic pollution As it stands now I can hardly exit PGA West with the traffic impacts on Madison. I also oppose the wave park  development die to concerns over any plan that will use copious amounts of water. This proposed project is also  geared to be exclusive, to members, meaning only the wealthy need apply. The developers of this project can  take this proposed plan to another area, We don't want or need in La Quinta!! Quality of life issues are  threatened as well as major environmental ones. HELP. SAY NO!!!   This project is ill‐conceived and environmentally irresponsible.  Please do not rezone and allow this to happen. This is a quiet residential area.  Allowing the rezoning and water park not only would disrupt the existing  residential area and change its character forever; but it would be an irresponsible thing to do environmentally.   Please do not allow this to happen. From quiet residential to noisy commercial.  Also, what happened to the water shortage problem? Noise, light pollution, water use, traffic. All big problems!! your website says it all, a change in zoning goes directly against the City of LaQuinta's current master plan and  will change the character of LaQuinta permanently We, as year around residents of PGA West for 20 years have recently fought a hard battle to limit short term  rentals & “vacation” destinations in our city. Corsl Mt Resort & The Wave are precisely the genre of  development we do not want in our vicinity. Time to move if this is approved.  We, as year around residents of PGA West for 20 years have recently fought a hard battle to limit short term  rentals & “vacation” destinations in our city. Corsl Mt Resort & The Wave are precisely the genre of  development we do not want in our vicinity. Time to move if this is approved.  It is preposterous that they would waste our valuable drinking water for someone to surf!? That is just  obscene!! Who even thought this was a smart idea in a DESERT?! Please call or me or email me as I would love  to discuss. If I even PROPOSED these Shenanigans at our business in Orange County they would have my head!!!  How did this even get this far? And the sad thing, is that we are second home residents. So without locals telling  us what is going on, we would have no clue. Shame on you for being shady! I know you won’t contact me as I  am against the project, but as a business owner, think about your community for god sakes! The complete waste of water. And it’s private. But really to waste that much water is a joke.  La Quinta For all of the above noted reasons. Ownership in residential areas should be protected from all commercial activities that would lessen their quality  of life. This covenant between the city and their citizens should never be violated.  This project has no place in our community. Many reasons: increased traffic,noise; water usage. Change from  quiet residential to commercial,recreational.  Water, traffic, light pollution  Too much traffic. Too many non residents in short term rentals.  Water is an issue and now is not the time for  this type of project     I feel that the city has allowed unfettered development that is putting severe strain on our water reserves at a  time when the the whole state of California is undergoing a severe long term drought. We have no certainty of  water from the reserve at Lake Mead. our aquifers are being depleted at an unprecedented rate .The Coral  Mountain development will put a further strain on this very dire situation.   The area will become very  congested and the quality of the quiet serene lifestyle will be disrupted by constant traffic and commotion  associated with the resort development. I am seriously considering other options if this development comes to  fruition   Sincerely   Balmukund Patel  Sunali Patel    54259 Southern Hills  La Quinta    92253   This permit to change the zoning should not be allowed! Zoning laws are established for a reason. Changing  those laws is unfair to home owners who invested in their property when the zoning laws were established.  Changing them for obvious monetary reasons is disingenuous, and should be done for only responsible reasons  and not affect in an adverse way long term owners of property who depended on the existing zoning rules when  they invested in the City of La Quinta. DO YOUR JOB and reject this rezoning request! Against Shirt term vacation rentals Against Shirt term vacation rentals Sixteen years ago my wife and I purchased our home in LA Quinta with the goal of a quieter life style. We were  currently living in the Los Angeles area raising our young kids and La quinta was our get way from a hectic life of  LA. Please don't ruin this by over building or changing the type of environment hundreds of retired people flock  to each year for respite and relaxation.  The most important reason for not allowing this Wave Resort is because we are in a desert which happens to be  in a severe drought.  That wave pool will use thousands of gallons of water that can, most certainly, be used for  much better purposes.  We property owners will likely be asked to conserve our water if not restricted or  charged higher fees. The other reasons are the added traffic and noise it will bring to these residential  too severe a change for our community. we don't need this development. esp the use of water is of concern To my understanding there are four wave parks planned for the Coachella Valley. It makes more sense to  develop such attractions in non residential areas such as the one slatted for Thermal. We have already been  down the road of the problems with sort term rentals and now we are faced with this issue again. Our son is a  world class professional surfer that operates a surf school on Maui and the west coast of California so we are  very familiar with the surf industry. I am familiar with the success of Kelly Slater's surf ranch in northern  California. It is not however located in a residential area. While I am not opposed to this type of attraction I am  definitely opposed to the location and the impact that it will have on our community. The proposed development does not fit into La Quinta’s low density residential environment. Further it will  illuminate Coral Mountain and what remains of our dark sky.  We came there because we love the desert.  Not development! The Coachella Valley hardly needs a 4th water park, and certainly not in a residential area! A commercial operation of the magnitude (size, volume, noise) in a residential and natural park area is ill‐ advised, and undermines that natural environment being preserved and the solid tax base of the residential  area.  Surely there are other viable locations for a commercial water park than in a neighbourhood and near  designated park lands. I HAVE BEEN UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT “SILVERROCK RESORT” WOULD SUFFICE OUR NEED FOR  ADDITIONAL RESORT PROPERTIES.   La Quinta Would destroy the peacefulness of a residential area.  We LOVE the tranquility of La Quinta and purchased our home to escape the rat race of Orange County. Please  keep our community a center for quiet recreation and relaxation. Too much water usuage Too close to residential areas. Need to find land in commercial zoned area.   California is in a serious drought situation and there is no reason to believe that this will that this will not  continue.  Water has to be conserved for residents and existing farms. La Quinta we don't need this kind of development in LaQuinta Too many STVR. We don't need another weekly Coachella Festival in town. Let us enjoy where we live. The density of the people who would be brought in would impact neighbors with regards to noise, large groups  of teenagers lowering quality of life for current residents.  Also the West is experiencing drought conditions!  This is a huge waste of of limited, precious natural resources. Everything about this development would negatively impact La Quinta and it’s residents.  I am totally against  this for many reasons and also that it will it impact my investment in my home. Disturbing the peaceful neighbourhood Noise carries today from the park when events are held . Traffic on Madison would be a nightmare with all of  the housing in the plan . Please deny the rezoning request .  This project will make this area untenable.  it's 100% out of character for the area.  Much better suited north of  10 FWY area. Roads are not built for that much traffic and we are very concerned about the noise of the pumps and jet skis ,  this is a golf community and will devalue the homes in the area  Concern of the water that will be needed for this project.  Concern of the traffic.  Concern of the light towers. Noise, nighttime light. Completely ruining the area for the residents who chose it for peace and serenity.  Put  this development out by highway 10 where it belongs. This beautiful piece of property, supported by the Coral Mountain, home for many Big Horn sheep and other  desert wildlife, should not be zoned commercial for the purpose of a project such as the Wave!  This is a quiet  residential area.  That’s why we all moved out here.  We’ve been a resident since 2006.  It’s unconscionable to  us that the City Council would approve a project that would require so much water from our already lowered  reserves, for a commercial thrill park, while threats of limiting our personable water use in the State and the  raising of our rates, are real.  The noise level a project such as this would create is just unthinkable for this highly  residential area.  The WAVE will generate an unacceptable noise level for the thousands of home owners from  early morning to late at night, every day and every night. Not to mention the sound from the concerts and  special events they will be holding.  Our traffic will increase with short term, rental seeking participants.  This is  not what you sold us on when we bought our home in 2006, in the beautiful GEM, La Quinta.  We beg you to  We do not want the traffic on Madison street, we do not want the noise in our peaceful community.  Since the area is zoned residential I have no problem with a additional home development I do have a problem  with the commercial aspect of the wave park,hotel and short term rentals Drought. This benefits very few people. They can surf in the ocean as GOD intended.  A waterpark is not what we need in our desert community due to water conservation / concern alone! We are in a drought water area. Why waste water on a surf park!!! Has anyone written to the CA Water Board?  They are encouraging people to conserve water. I agree, wrong venue at the wrong place at the wrong time!!!!!! Completely inappropriate use of water in the desert. Gluttony at its finest. 1. No benefit to the larger community. This is for wealthy resort residents only. 2. Wave park when we are in a  drought? 3. Noise, traffic, lights...it goes on.  With our constant water issues, the proposal of a wave/surf park in the desert is laughable.  Those who think  this is a good idea should be shamed.  We are in a desert where there is always a concern for water.  We are always in conserve mode with droughts.   Water rates keep increasing and usage allowances are not attainable (as methods to help users conserve).   Another development adding more stress to our water system is a bad move.  Adding a water consuming  wave/surf park in the desert is beyond ironic, it is foolish and a terrible idea.  This project originally was planned and presented to be a much smaller venue, and the homesites, hotel were  promised to be very high end.  The homesites were to be large, and the hotel was to be a 2 story boutique  hotel.     Current plans are to be very noisy, unsightly lights, and extended hours of wave operation.     Will take  down property values for all Country Club developments in the area; as well as private homes along 58th. to the  Quarry Country Club.  Not proper planning for City Council to approve this project.   Please deny rezoning. I'd like to understand why LQ Council thinks such switching zoned (quiet) residential property for a noisy, light‐ polluting water park located deep into the South of LQ makes sense.  It sure doesn't to me. Vacation rentals ? When valley cities are curtailing VRs. Lights, noise and traffic in a community developed  around quiet non commercial guidelines. It’s a terrible idea to put this into this area of the city or anywhere other than on the north side of Hwy 10! This  is such a ridiculous idea I can’t believe it has gotten this far! NO TO THE WAVE PARK!! PLEASE!! Retired here for the peace and quiet. This will be destroyed by the building of this adventure park. Indio Too much noise  We have much better ways to use our water resources.  Why am I replacing lawn and counting toilet flushes if  we are letting a giant wave pool be built.   This project would bring unwanted traffic, noise pollution and would disrupt the peace of the surrounding areas.  Please deny the request.  This is the wrong state and wrong area for such a project.  Needs to be in a state with no water issues.  We  should all be aware this is not California! Surrounding homeowners adjacent to the site purchased their homes with the understanding that the site  would be residential, not commercial. It is unfair and deceptive to existing La Quinta residents if the zoning is  changed! And stating the obvious, it would be extremely tone deaf on the part of city officials to allow a water  park when California and Riverside County are in the midst of a mega‐drought! Please show common sense and  vote NO to re‐zoning the site! The climate is changing, growing hotter and drier in this area. Human‐caused emissions play some role in this.  Adding a theme park that requires large amounts of water and depends on car travel for clientele is  irresponsible and ultimately unsustainable.  Do not allow this development simply for short‐term gain (greed). Too big of a project, too much traffic and noise, destroys our quiet community, uses too much water, not good  for the environment, etc. etc. Too much traffic and too much noise!! We have loved the quite and the starry skies with no lights!! This is  a complete waste of water, California is in a drought. I don't want it in my area. There are already going  to be two others through out the Valley.....thats enough. Also, it's private for guest and timeshare holders only,  not for public use.  There is plenty of available land for a wave park away from residential areas. This would have a negative impact  on the local residents. The environmental impact on the aquifer is huge.  The aquifer supplies the whole Coachella Valley, not just La  Quinta.  The evaporation factor further impacts the amount of water usage. The energy usage to generate  "waves". has another impact on our community.   I believe this is an issue that should be voted upon by the  entire water‐using population of Coachella Valley. This is the wrong area for a project of this kind, it should be closer to Highway 111 or I‐10.  The area is all homes,  so the zoning should stay residential/golf course or neighborhood type of businesses.  I believe it will make our  property value decrease because of the increase in traffic, short term vacationers, light pollution and noise.  I'm  not against the area being developed but develop it for what it is zoned for.   I have read that there are like  three other wave parks in the valley, don't know if that is true but if it is isn't that enough. A surf pool in this heat and in this drought is just RIDICULOUS A short‐sighted, impractical resort town project that will prove to be an irreversible problem for this community  in years to come! I am opposed to the Coral Mountain  rezoning  for many reasons     1.  We made an investment in an unfinished  project in  La Quinta in 2009 .  With the zoning in effect to be low density residential not tourist /commercial   that is a big rezoning        2.  According to an article in the Sacramento Bee April 16 2020, California and the West  suffering from the worst Megadrought in centuries.  The wave pool just itself will initially use 18 million gallons  of water from where?   As well as the proposed 150 hotel rooms and 500 STVR and residential components.   Where will this water come from?  At least some of it from the water that the residents of the CVWD saved by  conserving water because WE LIVE IN A DESERT.  I guess we conserved enough water to now waste this water?          3.  I live on Madison Street.  Who ever did the traffic analysis not certainly did not survey me.  It is ludicrous to  say there would be minimal impact.  The amount of traffic would certainly increases with just the impact of the  hotel and STVR.  In addition all the service vehicles and supply and service employee would at least double that  amount.  if not more.  Who did this survey?  There are probably better situated sites near I 10 that could handle  this type of traffic and development        4.  I thought that La Quinta had a dark sky ordinance.  The 17,  80 foot  light towers does not seem to fit that ordinance but it seems the dark sky ordinance was removed May 4 2021         5.  What impact would all of this have on the adjacent wilderness area and the protected Desert Bighorn Sheep  in the adjacent wilderness.  I walk on the proposed area almost daily and though I am certainly not an expert I  have seen evidence of the Desert Bighorn Sheep using that area      6,  What impact would this development  have on the adjacent archeological and petroglyphs sites ?      7,  The 1 to 2 million additional revenue would  certainly  not be worth it keeping La Quinta the Gem of the Desert.  The saying if the offer is too good to be true  it probably is not       8.  KEEP LA QUITA THE GEM OF THE DESERT This is the wrong project for this area, at the wrong time.  In the middle of one of the worst droughts in history.   We do not need or want another amenity for the very rich who will tire quickly of another new fad, and we, the  long time full time residents, will be left with another incomplete, unusable project.  They say they use less  water than a golf course ‐ a poor comparison as many golf courses are closing or struggling to stay open as the  sport loses popularity.  The zoning attracted many others to our stable, lovely communities, knowing our  investment in a beautiful quiet nature filled place would be honored by the town's original zoning.  The various  projects that have dragged on for years, such as Silverrock, should be a warning of what is to come.  Please do  not rezone this land and give a green light to this unwanted project.  The recent report issued by the developer  is filled with "holes" and incorrect information.  On top of it, similar projects are being built in adjacent areas.   Please listen to our petition, and thank you for your consideration. Water shortages, waste of water, noise  Water shortages, waste of water, noise  Water shortages, waste of water, noise  Water shortages, waste of water, noise  Complete waste of water in the middle of a historic drought … NO  Traffic, crime, degrading home values! Totally flies in the face of conserving water and energy as well as puts an amusement style park in the middle of  multiple retirement communities. I just find it incredulous that this is even being considered.  The Coral Mountain Resort rezoning proposal is simply irrational and irresponsible.     This project would  threaten depletion of La Quinta’s  and the Coachella Valley’s underground water resource. It will have a long‐ term negative impact on the entire La Quinta community.      The Wave project will bring increased noise,  disruptive nighttime light, and more traffic,     It will change the peaceful atmosphere and environment which  drew so many to live in La Quinta.     I strongly encourage the City Council to deny the rezoning for the Wave  NOISE. The decibel levels will be beyond the current ag levels and for residential  that are currently zoned now.    We moved to Trilogy for the amenities which include seeing stars at night (without glaring lights) and away from  traffic and noise pollution.  Please stop this rezoning which will affect our lifestyle and more importantly defies  all logic about conserving our water resources.   It is ridiculous to consider changing zoning from residential to commercial. We did our homework before  purchasing and bought in the area because it was quiet and peaceful and would never have considered doing so  if any such zoning was allowed. There are multiple other reasons it should not be allowed (water use, light  pollution, noise, traffic) as well. This will destroy our community. It will ruin the tranquil and private feel of the residential area. Not the element needed in the City of La Quinta;  especially the Southeast more upscale region.  This whole area is a residential area and to put in 4 story commercial is not acceptable We are in drought and the thought of a wasteful water park is not in our best interest.  The development will  add too much noise as well as traffic to the area.  The location of the proposed wave park is currently zoned “Low Density Residential, Open Space‐Recreational”  which is consistent with the design and use of existing adjacent residential communities and those being  planned.       The location, size, design and operating characteristics of this proposed project are not compatible  with existing and future land uses.  Furthermore, the project will create traffic, lighting and noise conditions  which will negatively impact adjacent residential communities.  I hope you will consider a different and  appropriate location for this project other than the center of residential communities.   Traffic, noise, litter, commercialism, and environmental issues.  Wrong place to have a noisy, with traffic faciity.  This is a quiet 55+ residential area. In the face on a major drought in California proceeding with this project is a major mistake. As residents we will  be asked to conserve water including such simple things as not running outdoor fountains due to evaporation.  Can you imagine  how much water will be evaporated every day from the wave basin.   The Council has been  dealing with the issues and problems of STR’s. This project is also proposing part time rentals!   Lastly, with  several other similar water wave projects proposed in the Coachella Valley, what is the likelihood that this  project including the sale of  million dollar homes will be financially  viable.  At least Walt Disney built Disney World and Disneyland by not impacting the residential zoning.  He was smart  enough to purchase the project property and the property around his.  This project is in the existing residential  zone.  My guess is that the council has already been approached by the Slater people.  The Slater Group would  not spend millions of dollars to speculate on a project this size without some indication that it would be  approved.  Typical politicians getting rich and ignoring their constituents concerns.  Lets be sure to vote them  out after they pass the project. We are heading into the worst drought in California history.  The politicians can not even save the Salton Sea.   The Salton sea is turning into hazardous waste zone that will also impact the Coachella Valley.  The proposed  project does not belong in a residential zoned area.  There is a lot of vacant acreage in more rural areas.  Why  should the existing residents suffer from the greed of politicians that do not even live in the immediate area.   Every council member who votes for this project to continue should be voted out of office.  Check their bank  Huge waste of water, noise factor to our community + traffic increase.  We do not want to live in a community near the proposed resort.  We want the La Quinta City Council to deny  the Coral Mountain Resort rezoning.  This is the wrong choice for our community.  We are now in a drought  situation‐‐this rezoning doesn't make sense. Too many serious concerns to mention! The property was zoned correctly in the first place. We certainly don’t  need a noisy , dirty, water guzzling park in our beautiful city! Please don’t put this place on our land, la Quinta is known for its peace and calm and remote feeling, away from  the crowd. It doesn’t belong here. This is the most beautiful and precious land we have left. It is nestled right  here against out desert mountains among family neighborhoods. This would destroy our calm little area of the  desert. The light pollution, the water waste, the land waste, all going in the wrong direction of our present day  needs.   PLEASE STOP THIS FROM HAPPENING TO OUT COMMUNITY! Please Don’t let this happen to us!  Many Trilogy residents bought here because we liked the peace and quiet away from all the NOISE. All of our  residents are 55+ and we retired to peace and quiet. This water park does not belong in this tranquil  environment. Jane Balmer and Greg Potter We moved here for what La Quinta had to offer!    Keep La Quinta the "Gem Of The Dessert!".    Do not give in  to the pressure from the big money developers!    If you do what is right you will be able to look at yourself in  the mirror and be proud of yourself! La Quinta I am totally against this wave park in La Quinta! It will destroy our neighborhood! So very tone deaf to waste water on a surfing pool 100 miles from the ocean.   We are in a severe drought  We are in severe drought conditions. The water usage is unreasonable and irresponsible for this size of a project  and infrastructure. We moved here because it's peaceful. This project will take away that serenity. Also a sad waste of water. We  are in a drought and proposing using that amount of water for unheard of recreation in the middle of the desert  is just environmentally negligent. There are so many other places people can go for surfing and watersports. We  should be focused on preserving the natural beauty of our desert. Our hard earned dollar laquinta should be respected as we invested in a place to retire. Let us enjoy what ever  we have time left. I am concerned about this project for a number of  reasons, but foremost among them: It is inconsistent with  existing zoning; the devloper's proposed change in zoning is inconsistent with the neighborhood; light pollution  from 80' light poles; the effects on traffic, particularly during mass special events; and what appears to me to be  a monumental waste of our precious water resources.  Please do not approve this zoning change and project. Do not want our valuable and threatened drinking water wasted. We moved from PGA West to The Quarry to get away from the noise and STVR's.  I am so upset to think you will  allow Merriweather to rezone an area for a project like Coral Mountain.  It goes against the surrounding  residential neighborhoods.  If approved you will have introduced an enormous water basin that is unacceptable  to open during a drought and will use an enormous amount of water, increased noise levels all day, light  pollution, increased traffic.  I did not move to The Quarry to have this amusement park open in y backyard.  The  natural beauty of Coral Mountain and its views will be gone forever.   We never would have moved to The  Quarry if we knew such a project was being considered.  I beg you ro reconsider approving this project.  I do not  want to live around years and years of Merriweather building this project. Noise factor and water conservation This proposal to use this high volume amount of water, when water is in such demand already in our community  is so reckless. The only possible reason that I can fathom is that someone is expecting a huge pay off !!  Please  think of the rest of us and do the right thing for the community that you took an oath to serve. WE DID NOT MOVE TO LA QUINTA TO HAVE A DISNEYLAND TYPE PARK NEXT TO THE WILDNESS OF THE DESERT  WITH A BEAUTIFULY NIGHT SKY!  SHAME ON A DEVELOPER TRYING TO THIS TO A WELL ESTABLISHED SMALL  TOWN THAT ENJOYS THE REMOTE DESERT SURROUNDING AND LESS TRAFFIC AND PEOPLE.  THIS WOULD ALSO  BRING MORE CRIME TO THE AREA; NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.  SO PLEASE, LETS REMAIN A SMALL TOWN WITHOUT  ALL THE OUTSIDE NEGATIVE INFLUENCES A PROJECT OF THIS NATURE WOULD CERTAINLY BRING!  SINCERELY,  RICHARD DALE,JD. If would forever change the peaceful tranquility of La Quinta! As a proud member of the La Quinta Community I strongly oppose the re‐zoning proposal. We have a quiet  peaceful community. Many of us have retired here and we chose it for the tranquility. We want it to remain that  way. There is a drought.  This is a desert.  Other ill thought out wave parks have failed.  Learn from history.  Protect  your community. The proposed resort is sure to bring more noise, more traffic and more pollution to our quiet and beautiful  community.   Do not forget that we live in a drought  environment.  Our water levels are dropping every year..   and you. Want to put in a large water wasting wave pool!!   ????????? The proposed resort is sure to bring more noise, more traffic and more pollution to our quiet and beautiful  community.   Do not forgetCancel WATER, WATER, WATER!!!!   Surf park not needed in this city. Save water for our farms.  Please consider We bought our home in Trilogy in 2005   so we could spend our retirement years in an area of breathtaking  beauty and peaceful quiet. PLEASE NO WATERPARK!!!! Do not destroy the last few years of my life by taking  away  the dream of a lifetime. The letter in Nextdoor said it all.  It's not needed in our neighborhood.  It's not needed at this time of severe  water  shortages throughout the state.   I am concerned mostly with the water issue. Our area is suffering from extreme drought with no end or solution  in sight and I feel this project will only exacerbate this crisis. This not a necessary project for our community.  Dear City Council members,   Several weeks ago I listen to a presentation on the  proposed Coral Mountain  wave park presented by Meriwether developers.   After listening to the presentation and two comments and  questions by informed community residents,  it quickly became very clear to me that this wave park proposal is  the wrong development at the wrong time in the wrong place.  • The developer made it clear that the operating  hours will be from 7 AM to 11 PM 365 days per year   • based on questions from residents,  The developer  eluded to the fact that live large events will take place much more frequently than the advertise four times per  year.  • Sports venues and activities initially mentioned is just the beginning,  additional events and activities will  be added overtime.  • The venue is a strictly private enterprise with no use or benefit to the outside community  whatsoever.  • noise from loud speakers music venues wave announcements etc. is a reality.  • based on  comments questions and facts presented by knowledgeable residents, it appears the water use calculations are  grossly under stated  and the water used will come directly from our drinking water aquifers .   As a La Quinta  resident I cannot imagine a more irresponsible use of our precious natural resource .....water!   • climate change  is real!   • The drought is real!   • water conservation is part of life now and will continue to be in the future .    The proposed wave park project should not be built anywhere in the Cochella Valley, anywhere in the state of  California anywhere in the western United States or water is a problem,  it would be irresponsible  and  reprehensible  to allow this project to move forward.   I urge the La Quinta city Council to act responsibly and  protect the well‐being of La Quinta and Coachella Valley citizens by not wasting our precious water supply,  in  exchange for money. Shame on you!   I urge you to deny the zoning change that would allow this project to  move forward.  JUST SAY NO!  Thank you,  Sylvia K Lasser  81401 Golden Poppy Way       This Water Park is very irresponsible project.  I know you realize we are in a major drought so DO THE RIGHT  THING AND VOTE NO!!! I am strongly against this water park in our peaceful desert retirement community. The noise pollution and light  pollution will be unavoidable, along with the negative impact on our scarce water resources. This is the wrong  project in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Noise, light pollution, increased traffic, waste of water in a severe drought situation. We’re in the middle of a 20 year drought.  We should not be building these things in the desert and certainly not  in a residential area.  THIS WILL ROB US OF OUR PEACE.  PLEASE GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.  WHERE THERE ARE THE TEENS WHO WILL  LOVE YOUR PARK.  No to taking water from our aquafer for needless recreation. There are many issues of concern related to the proposed area adjacent to our home at Trilogy:  *excessive use  of water in our drought ridden valley  * noise/ night lighting from Surf area  *increase of construction traffic  during building of the   development   *viability for development to be sustainable  Palm Desert    Impacts community, & wildlife dramatically   Palm Desert    Not appropriate to impact the community and environment in such a dramatic way.  Not a good fit for the communities surrounding this location especially a 55+. Noise is by far #1, the destruction  or lack of preservation of Coral Mtn is #2 which serves hikers, runners, bikers, horseriders, history buffs, artists  and others, not to mention the beauty of it. #3 is opens the door for pushing the limits set such as noise,  lighting, activities, # of people etc. Who's going to keep it in check?  This simply is not the place for it. There is  land futher out to the east that is open where the noise won't bounce off the side of a mountain. It may even  have better access than this location. Certainly can hold more people and probably less restrictions on it.  Please  preserve the south end of La Quinta with it's quietness, nature and beauty that we homeowners bought here  My concern is about water usage.   Not just filling the facility but also keeping it a required capacity due to  evaporation in our hot desert climate.  Since we are in a drought situation it just doesn't make sense to be  creating a water park that will use thousands of gallons of the precious commodity.    We moved here to be in a quiet neighborhood.  This will ruin the integrity of the neighborhood, to say nothing  of the environmental damage.  Outrageous idea in this location and drought cycle! I am a winter resident at the Quarry from December to early May. The Quarry, PGA West, and Andalusia are all  residential communities that would be severely and negatively impacted by such a large commercial  development as proposed by the Wave. Water supplies would be threatened, noise regulations violated and  traffic congestion amplified by at least 5‐8 times current levels. The biggest concern I have is with the water consumption.  What an utter waste of the water we have. This  sounds like another vanity/money maker for Surfer Joe.  My other conerns are noise, energy, traffic. UGH!  The  whole project should not be located here in the desert.  i oppose re‐zoning.  i am fine with new developments.........as long as the water shortages are  addressed.........and the planned community meets CURRENT zoning criteria.     Absurd to do something like this when we are in a drought situation! This project would greatly increase traffic  not to mention the light pollution. Thought La Quinta had a "dark sky" policy? This is a very inappropriate use of our water resources.  A water us of this magnitude cannot be justified in a  desert community like La Quinta.  The EIR should be more specific on evaporation and annual water usage.      Secondly the noise pollution of the project within the community is makes rezoning this property inappropriate  How is this a benefit to our community.  The beauty and solitude will never be the same. Nor will our beautiful  birds and animals like our big horn sheep. And the noise and water usage with our drought. No to this wave park.  We are a residential community and most residents moved here for the peace, quiet and tranquility of the area.  Residents travel more than most La Quinta residents for groceries and gas, but enjoy peaceful, beautiful  surroundings not polluted by big light, excessive traffic and noise. This project is an affront to all residents living  here and should be stopped.  Noise travels easily and is captured by the mountains. The noise created will  destroy our quality of life. That doesn’t even begin to address  the concerns I have over the use of water when  we are in the worst drought ever in our State. Devastating water shortage, crime, and this is a residential neighborhood.  In fact with this water shortage there  should not be Any more developments in the Coachella Valley.  Common sense Because of all the things that have been mentioned before.g., noise, lights, traffic, etc. Vehemently opposed to this abomination in our neighbourhood.  Water use during unprecedented times.  Noise  and traffic in a residential area is      Unconscionable.  No! Neighborhood rights for no more noise, traffic, loss of water, right of enjoyment for 55 and over community and  environmental concerns. Water consumption, noise and lights impact the quality of life for EVERYONE in a negative way.   La Quinta The noise and traffic would be terrible, I didn’t invest on a home at the Quarry to be beside something like this.  Would be devastating! I cannot imagine the city changing rezoning laws that they have already approved, and putting a noisy, water  hogging "surf park" right in the middle of a quiet residential area.  It is beyond belief. Also, please look at the  history of these surf parks in TX, Fl. They have not been successful... more likely they will leave an ugly botched  mark on La Quinta than this will be a success. La Quinta City Council: I am against the refining for a Water Park that will be noisy and disruptive to the  peacefulness here in Trilogy… The size, along with the multiple bright lights and waste of water is unacceptable  and unnecessary….I do not believe this development and added traffic and noise will benefit our property  values, quite the opposite, it will lessen the value. Please do not approve this project. I have said from the beginning...wrong place, wrong time. This is a residential area, NOT resort (which is what  this will become with the wave, hotel and allowance of STRs). The claim that this will be private are ludicrous  given the location and the challenges for businesses (and this will be a business) in the heat months. The claim  that there will be no significant impact on the surrounding neighborhoods is ludicrous (traffic, noise). We live  here. We know, not them. Plus I guarantee you this fad will be a hole in the ground within 5‐10 years at best.  Finally, but not less important, how can you approve a project that requires thousands of gallons of water when  we are in a severe drought???  Wrong place, wrong time! Our property will be further impacted by traffic noise from yearly events. In addition the looming drought  remains a threat to our desert area and this waste of water in a desert area is unnecessary. Lastly this is a  retirement community thus this wave park will be noisy. Changing the zoning to accommodate the loss of  water, increased noise and traffic goes against LaQuinta’s goals for an enhanced standard of living. Please  reconsider moving the park to another area that is industrial where homeowners will not be tormented by  additional unnecessary noise, traffic and the misuse of water. Water is for drinking‐ not surfing.  Would add to traffic, congestion, noise, and not ecologically sound.  I can here  for peace and quiet; I like the town as it is.  It is quiet at this end‐ let’s keep it that way. We live at Trilogy La Quinta.  We love our quiet neighborhoods, less traffic and our beautiful mountains.  We  don’t need more noise, traffic, lights at all times of the day.  Water shortage is also a major concern when we  are in a drought situation.  Please, we don’t need a wave park.   1. Water waste first and foremost (during historic drought or any other time)  2.Traffic!   3.Noise pollution   4.Light pollution (what happened to La Quinta's anti‐light pollution policy?)  This is a money hungry project that  cares not one bit for the above issues. It is breathtakingly obvious that it should NOT be approved. Thank you       I moved to this area for the quite and peaceful environment. This project will interfere with the reason most of  us chose this area. Please do not change the zoning. Noise pollution and Light pollution is unacceptable. How can city hall approve this with the water shortage? This project is wrong Please no additional noise and traffic.. Please no additional noise and traffic.. We seriously enjoy peace and quiet, we also love to see stars. We will lose peace & quiet, the sky will be bright,  and traffic will be menacing. Commercial development of this magnitude in the middle of  established residential communities is  unacceptable. People purchased their home far removed from commercial  Development for a reason. The  noise, crowds and light pollution involved with this project from an residential zoned area is unacceptable  We purchased our home purposely knowing that the surrounding area was far away from all the commercial  development and the surrounding areas were zoned as such. To force a commercial development in the middle  of residential communities that involves so noise pollution, crowds, special events, etc is unbelievably unfair to  La Quinta residents in the area. There are already 3 other water parks in development in the Coachella Valley.  What will happen to this property if it fails. It is an incredible waste of 18 million gallons of drinkable water from  our water table in the middle of a historic drought. The whole project just seems like a money crab but the city  council to get a few extra tax dollars with no concern for the loyal  Citizens of the city.  La Quinta,  The wasteful use of water in a desert climate in this time of climate change Too much growth let's not let our valley become another Orange County! I moved out for peace.  I don’t want noise, lights at night or the traffic.  This area should be kept zoned the way it is.  NOBODY wants a noisy, water wasting surf park here Meeds to be in a more adequately zoned commercial area. With access to freeways, etc. Strongly opposed to using our precious water resources to supply this project. Also strongly opposed to the  congestion it would bring and defacing of the natural beauty of Coral Mountain and the Lake Cuhuilla area.   Wrong place, wrong time. La Quinta, I am very concerned about the traffic and noise implications of this development. I live nearby and  belong to The Quarry Golf Club which will be severely impacted. The environmental reprucuiond to our  beautiful mountain is also concerning. It seems there are other places in the Desert that would be more  appropriate for a project of this scale and impact.  Terrible idea. Will ruin the peace and quiet of this beautiful area. This is not the place for this proposed eyesore  Significant traffic and noise I enjoy sitting outside every day.  The noise from this entity will ruin my enjoyment and the traffic will tie up  Madison avenue and make it dangerous to drive on the street.  To allow this entity to be built in the middle of a  residential area makes absolutely no sense!  The area is not conducive to a coney  island atmosphere. The water waste is incredulous. More lipstick on bigger  This project is a waste of our valuable water resourced and it should not be put in the middle of several  residential communities. I live across Madison from this project.  I bought my house knowing the property was zoned for low‐density  residential with a golf course.  I never would have bought next to an amusement park, a hotel, or a site that  would host regular events with hundreds of short‐term renters. This is an affront to me and violates the general  zoning plan for this area.  It must not go forward.  Just took a photo the other day of a big horn sheep crossing 58 if wave park comes where will he go?  Plus  peace and Quiet is why we bought out here and the dark for stars at night and the animals we had a bob cat and  a big horn sheep in our yard last week, so beautiful, please don’t let this be taken away from us Dear council. My reasons for not wanting the wave park next to where I live are much like others. However it’s  just not right. How can anyone justify using this incredible amount of water for a project in the middle or  beginning of the worst drought in California’s history? It’s not being responsible no way no how. I truly can’t  believe this project is even being considered. The zoning isnt even correct. We would have never bought our  retirement home in trilogy had we known this project was even going to be considered. Would any of you want  to live next door to a amusement park that was going to disrupt your peace and serenity in your golden years ?  Would you want your parents to ?  This whole thing is so wrong in so many ways yet here we are. Please say no  to this awful disruptive noise making, traffic making water wasting irresponsible project. No matter how you try  to justify it it’s just plain wrong. Thank you  We moved here  this wonderful location enjoying our retirement years. Not to have a wave park in my  backyard.  Which would bring in more tourists,noise,pollution,traffic etc. Also what happens if there  is a major  earthquake there does all that water go This "Wave" project is out of character with the desert and the existing communities.  The project would add  traffic, water usage, light and noise, and behavior problems. laquinta Wrong time.  Wrong location. I believe responsible development is what is needed in this area. There is too much residential development,  which stands to suffer because this business location. Please do not approve this development and put the  residents before the donations.  U This complex is simply being place in the wrong location.  The area is primarily a residential area mainly  comprised of seniors.  The golf course fits in with the locale. This build is a  mixed use, rental residential  commercial project.  The traffic increase, noise, and transient holidayers will negatively impact the  neighbourhood.  The project simply needs to be relocated to a more commercial neighbourhood.  The water park will have a negative impact on our communities. We are in the middle of a drought and that  should be reason enough for a no on wasting water when people might not have enough to grow crops or drink.      So I am TOTAl AGAINST it.   Rosette Kivel Moved to desert from Los Angeles for peace quiet beautiful stars at night   Less congestion and traffic  I want to keep the peace and quiet of our neighborhood, not live next door to a sports zoo.  Traffic, noise, water consumption EVERYTHING about this project is wrong for this location. Too many serious issues to numerate! This is an unwarranted and unwanted project that should be dismissed.  The city council needs to pay attention  to the residents this would impact. Construction for years, noise, no traffic plans, pollution, loss of natural habitat for sheep, light pollution at night.  Sever and undesirable impact on the surrounding communities, ecosystems of the desert and water  consumption. It will also impact the Big Horn Sheep's natural habitat. Sever and undesirable impact on the surrounding communities, ecosystems of the desert and water  consumption. It will also impact the Big Horn Sheep's natural habitat. Water is a huge issue.  This is the wrong usage of water especially during the worst drought the Western United  States has seen in years. We are in a drought and this project would be very irresponsible. We need conservation not a wave park.  I moved here for a quiet residential life style.  I moved here because there was a lack of high traffic venues in  this area.  This project is not good use of water. Water, noise, will ruin the quiet ambiance we all moved out here for I am mostly concerned about the amount of "drinking water" required.  Plus I'm sure the noise will bother  neighbors.  This is no time to waste water! It’s just all wrong, everything about it! The  Primarily, the effect it will have on traffic, congestion, and noise in the area I live in, off Madison, at PGA West.   Secondarily, but equally as important, is my concern about the large buildout, and the climate/water issues we  are experiencing and will continue to experience moving forward.  Now is NOT THE RIGHT TIME for this project!  My main concern is the potable water usage.  We are in the beginning of a many year drought and we just do  not have the water. The area is already congested enough with the festivals. Put it somewhere that can support the high traffic load  and accommodations, and not right in our neighborhoods. I left Los Angeles in 2012 for PGA West in La Quinta due to the serenity and ability to “star and planet” watch  through my backyard telescope.  I so enjoy the lack of crowds and noise and am very concerned about the  commotion & traffic this project will bring.  Unnecessary excessive water use during extensive long term drought is our primary complaint. Traffic, noise,  lights and short term rentals are big concerns as well.  Too much impact  Wrong project for this site  Many reasons.  Not zoned as commercial.  This is a residential zoned area and should remain such.  No reason it  can't be moved east to a more suitable location that will not impact our beautiful area.  I'm a no on this project  because of the impact of noise, traffic, lights, and usage of scarce water.  Can't believe that our planners would  think this is a fit for our residential community. This is not good. I’m all for economic development but not at the cost of our natural resources. My family and I  recently moved to La Quinta and we love it! If we wanted a lot more development + waves we would have  purchased in the Marina in LA. We are in love with the slower pace of life and the community like environment.  I would love to see more development Catered to young families. I don’t see how this buildout benefits the  young ones who live here specially since the next generation is extremely Eco‐conscious. This also brings up the  question for me of how we build out La Quinta without negative affects to our natural resources? Recently relocated to La Quinta from Orange County. Part of our reasoning for relocating had to due with  excessive traffic and overcrowding. Adding a resort like this amongst residential communities will bring added  congestion to our community. Dear Council Members,     I have been a LQ resident for over 25 years.  IMO, the proposed Coral Mountain  Resort with its massive wave feature and disruptive presence (lighting, overall use, traffic impacts, etc). is not  appropriate for this community.  Not to mention the grossly abusive water use, in fact, the mere appearance of  that issue alone should be off‐putting and give Counsel pause.   Please, listen to us, your continuants and from  the LQRRD ‐ acquiesce to our demands.   There are many other ways to fill the LQ City coffers besides this  development.    Thank you for reading and for your consideration of my opinion.    Sincerely,    Jacque Stewart Dear Council Members,     I am a LQ resident for over 15 years.  My letter is based upon over 20 years of my  successful real estate development experience in the Temecula Valley ‐ an area very similar to the economic  and social environment found in La Quinta.      The proposed Coral Mountain Resort with its massive wave  feature and disruptive presence (lighting, overall use, traffic impacts, etc). Not to mention the grossly abusive  water use, in fact, the mere appearance of that issue alone should be off‐putting and give Counsel pause.       Considering all those factors, in my professional opinion,  this proposed development is not in the best interest  of the La Quinta community ‐ it is "irresponsible development" personified.  Please, listen to your continuants  from the LQRRD and acquiesce to their demands.   There are many other ways to fill the LQ City coffers besides  this development.    Thank you for reading and for your consideration of my opinion.    Sincerely yours,    Richard  One of the most beautiful aspects of LaQuinta (and desert) living is to be able to look up toward the sky at night  and see the stars. This is because of very little ambient light from commercial and recreational developments.  This proposed circus environment will obliterate that for miles around the proposed project—ruining the  environment for the benefit of a few who want to water surf in the desert. Even saying it out loud makes one  shake their head in wonderment as to how anyone could think this was a good idea.  At least cut the hours of  Do not rezone to commercial use in a purely residential area all ready zoned  light residential.  No other  commercial development in the area for miles around.  Sound generated will probably reflect off of the Coral  Mountains and adjacent wilderness area.  There are potentially better areas available nearer I 10 which would  give better access to this type of venue to vehicular traffic as opposed to using residential streets to gain access  to the venue .  Definitely the wrong place for this and the amount of water use is probably going to be more  than expected.   I am definitely opposed  to this type of development here.   It will diminish the beauty of the area through noise and light pollution. We will be directly affected by this development.  We have donated to the Go Fund Me and thank Ramon for his  efforts   This project would Permanently change the peaceful neighborhood here at Trilogy. My wife and I moved to  Trilogy at La Quinta 6 years ago after looking at other over 55 communities here in the valley. We chose to live  here because of location. Please don't take the peaceful, quite, ease of driving for shopping & eating at  restaurants with little traffic away. We are in our mid 80's and the thought of moving again is very stressful. We  love it here just as it is. With all the noise and increased traffic this project would bring reminds of as to why we  left the SF Bay Area to live in La Quinta.    My concerns are water conservation and noise. Please don't change the zoning to allow this wave park. Worried about noise . Our environment is quiet now. Also water park during drought conditions seems  inappropriate I live very close to the site. I’m extremely concerned about the additional traffic sound and light pollution. The traffic on Madison Avenue cannot be mitigated. It is the only artery of traffic coming to the development.   With a 150 room hotel and hundreds of condos on the vacation rental schedule it is unsurmountable.  Technical  reports defending draft EIRS have always mitigated traffic. Your next door neighbors in Corona CA all had traffic  mitigation measures and now we have a 12 lane freeway which is bumper to bumper traffic and all the traffic  mitigation reports in the 1980's were simply wrong.  The entire I‐15 corridor also had traffic mitigation for the  full mitigation for the full I‐15 corridor and it is also a nightmare.  All of the experts, traffic engineers, who stated  equivocally that traffic could be mitigated, were false and now it is coming to our town.  Follow the money! It will forever change the complexity of La Quinta and the surrounding area in a negative way. Traffic and noise level This is an immoral development that is a waste of water that is needed for life.  It will destroy the solitude of our community.  Traffic issues and noise and light pollution will be a detriment to  our environment.  The people that this facility will attract add nothing to the City of La Quinta and will detract  from it's reputation.  The water conservation issue alone is more than enough to reject the proposal and not  rezone our neighborhood.  We need Grocery Stores and shopping  in La Quinta not a Wave Park.  As a person  who was a surfer in my youth, trust me, you don't want them here in or near a retirement community.  Ask  Traffic, noise, too much light at night, need to conserve water, concerned about commercial designation, etc.,  etc., etc. We settled  in La Quinta for peace and quiet in our golden years.  Please don't take these away! There is a mega‐drought in all western states, it is irresponsible to use millions of gallons of water for such an  unimportant facility.  It’s irresponsible to consider this project in the midst of a mega‐drought  that could possibly go on for years.   I am so concerned about many aspects of this project. First, it seems crazy that there are 5 new wave projects  planned for the Coachella Valley when there were none before, and all except one are planned to be private,  and incredibly expensive if one wants to surf there.     The issue of our drought is foremost, though. How on  earth anyone can even consider approving this project which will use fresh, potable water at this time of severe  and devastating drought is beyond insane.  I beg the city to be responsible and deny approval. This project is totally irresponsible in light of the on going record breaking drought due to climate change.  How  can you let this developer use our precious drinking water at a time when we are not even sure how the water  will be replenished.  Additionally homeowners purchased their homes in the adjoining communities with the  understanding Coral Mountain would be developed with single family homes and a golf course corresponding to  the neighboring communities.  Most of us purchased for the quiet upscale lifestyle this area afford.  Most of us  would not have purchased here if we had known a extreme sport amusement park would be going in at Coral  Mountain.  A project that no way corresponds to the surrounding developments.  Please do the right thing and  decline this out of step project.  Putting it in would be the biggest negative on the Gem of the Desert outside of  Noise, traffic and unnecessary water usage during a drought goes against everything we moved here to enjoy.  I strongly am opposed the wave park project. My bedroom window will stare directly in line with the proposed  80’ lights. Keeping me up every night 365 till 10pm or longer. Who the heck surfs at night anyways?    Say no to  short term rentals, so no to parties, say no to 3 stray buildings against the Coral Mountain. Just say no.  Noise, usage of water, traffic, lack of concern for neighboring communities.  I am completely against rezoning.  That is not why I moved the La Quinta. I want it to stay the same. Ridiculous to even consider given the drought ‐ immediate and future outlook.  Basically, no reason to move  foward with this other than potential revenue for La Quinta which, I believe, will NOT be anywhere near where  forecasted by the promoters. Drought, noise, lights ruining the night sky, traffic, being restricted from hiking Coral Mountain, not the right  place or time for this project. There is plenty of land nearer highway 10 or further away from already developed property to develop  something so loud. The roads would NOT be able to handle the additional traffic and the lights and sounds  would be a major nuisance.   I don't believe this area of La Quinta is suitable for the proposed plan.  I feel strongly that it will "cheapen" the  surrounding communities.   If Arnie were still living here in La Quinta I think he would feel the same way.   There  are so many other wonderful activities and events that would continue to enhance our city.  I hope the City of  La Quinta will always keep this in mind.   Thank you. La Quinta La Quinta If the City is looking to increase tax revenue, then let the developers find more suitable properties in areas such  a the 111 corridor  The reason I chose to live here was to get away from the traffic and noise and to enjoy the surrounding beauty.   My concerns are related to the environment and the destruction this wave park will cause.  Water and  electricity are major concerns.  Conservation of both are of the utmost importance, making this proposal a  This development does not belong in a residential area.  It also makes no sense when current residents are  already being asked to conserve water because of drought and to conserve electricity to avoid power outages.  This development makes no sense in our current situation and sets a horrible example. Drought issues   Traffic issues   Noise issues  Etc I moved here because of the lack of traffic and the tranquility of the area.  If I wanted to move into an area  considered commercial property I wouldn’t have moved it.  This will ruin the quality of life here.  It is bad  enough that we have to deal with rowdy short term vacation renters and their noise and traffic! It's absolutely irresponsible on the part of the city to even think about considering the zoning change to an  amusement type resort amongst single family homes AND especially for the water usage in a hot desert where  we are under drought conditions most of the time. They should put it down near the Salton Sea in an area of no  homes and let them pump water out of the Salton Sea. This project is entirely out of synch with this area of La Quinta.  Our quiet low key community will be inundated  with traffic, noise and a fairground type environment which is totally out of character with the residential  environment we have here in Trilogy and and the other communities in this southern area of La Quinta. Where  are the concerns about water management when we are experiencing record temperatures and increasingly  severe drought conditions.  This project is completely out of character with both the needs of our community  and the negative impact on the environment including extreme water wastage.  If you want to surf go to the  ocean ‐ it’s not that far away!    Thank you ‐ let common sense and concern for the environment guide your  decision making.    Jim Newman The last thing we need is a wave park in the desert with the climate  heating up and drying up.   For all the afore‐mentioned reasons we are opposed but particularly for the unsustainable environmental  foolishness of this project is incomprehensible and truly short‐sighted.  NO, NO, NO.  Please do not move  forward on this project.   The negative impact on the environment. Seismic issues, noise  and traffic congestion    I moved to Andalusia   four peace and quiet. The water park project will destroy this beautiful community. People come to palm springs for a relaxing, upscale getaway. Adding a Mickey Mouse waterpark across the  street from high‐end resorts is not the right decision.  I adamantly oppose the rezoning of this parcel.  It does not belong in a residential neighorhood. After 30 years living within 1000 feet of the ocean in Manhattan Beach I got tired of the crowds and constant  crowd in the neighborhood.  I thought my new home in PGA West was the tranquility solution I was looking  for…. I don’t even have to deal with the line‐up on PGA Blvd as we enter from Madison .   Needless to say, it’s  quite distressing to think my City Council will allow this intrusion to me, and all of the other retirees in the  Noise, traffic, environmental impact, water shortage.  We just bought into the community last year and made a trade off to be further out to enjoy the quiet.  This  proposed development will cheapen the area, cause noise, add traffic and alter the environment of our  There is no benefit to this community, no benefit for the environment...just benefits selfish developers and ego  driven council members. Please do not call me. I agree with all the reasons why it's not right for us.  Because the neighborhood needs to be peaceful for what it costs It will bring in more traffic and it will put a tighter restraint on the resources. La quinta is a unique, high end,  space that will be downgraded should a park of this nature be placed there.  For all of the above or attached info ‘say no to Coral Mountain Resort’ Climate change is in process which will mean hotter, drier seasons for the Coachella Valley. Potable water for  drinking and agriculture is already a concern. Building a 16.7 acre pool filled from the aquifer is irresponsible! Do  not rezone this property.   It is unconscionable to facilitate building projects that consume massive amounts of water and power.  This  development is obnoxious and obtrusive and has no place in the pristine desert landscape.  We would do well to  preserve our natural resources and limit our footprint.  ‐   Even any golf course that might end up approved  should be a xeriscape golf course ‐ saving water of such magnitude that it is nationally recognized for its forward  thinking sustainability.   La Quinta I do not support this project.  It is not compatible with the current developments in the area.  The Park and  Resort should be located away from residential properties. No rezoning, no more noise, no high density…. No destruction of the beautiful desert in this area. Not the right  place for this type of facility. Please!!!!! La Quinta I have lived on Ave 60, (right next door to the project) for 30 years.  I am very concerned about the water usage,  noice (bouncing off of the mountain) and  noice from the park, lights, traffic on both Ave 60 and Madison,  vibrations from the motion of the wave causing cracks in my home and pool. None of which they will guarantee  will not effect my home or property.  I have other concerns about blowing dirt, construction traffic and noise  during the development.  I was told by an employee of the development  to "go stay in San Diego" so these  things would not effect me.  Not an appropriate answer.... This project is totally inappropriate for La Quinta. The noise, congestion, STR’s which are not permitted in our  City, but most important is protecting our water source.  Our aquifer is not being replenished as expected and  with the drought everywhere in the Western US, it is unlikely it will be.  This use of our precious natural  resource for a water park is unconscionable.  This is California with miles of coastline for surfing.  The developers  seem to think this will be popular in the summer. I disagree.  Why am I and many of my neighbors and friends  who live in the desert in the winter months now gone for cooler climates?  I have been saving newspaper  articles on the drought which I intend to send to the council members, just in case they are only looking for tax  revenues. I could go on and on but I believe this website covers it thoroughly. NO WAVE PARK IN LA QUINTA  La Quinta is no place for a water park. It will ruin the natural beauty of the territory. It will add significantly  congestion and noise to a peaceful residential area. The zoning should remain solely as originally designed.  We bought our home in Trilogy, right next to this proposed development, because of the tranquil beauty and  quiet that exists here. The specter of this gigantic disruptive development is very distressing! This project will become a cancer that will spread and finally kill the sense that the surrounding community is  residential and not commercial. I purchased my home in a residentially zoned area to have the benefits of a quiet, low volume traffic,  commercial free neighborhood. This project runs counter to all these qualities and is not the right entity and not  the right time.  Thanks  We love the peace and quiet of our neighborhood.  Don’t need additional noise and traffic.   This project makes no sense.  It will deplete our already short supply; create too much noise and more  importantly, the amount of traffic will make it nearly impossible to drive on Madison Avenue and other near by  streets.  STOP IT NOW! against commercial zoning with transient behavior  Traffic, noise, misuse of water, loud music to drown out machines all day & into night….put it near freeway &  away from communities if you must have it!!! I’m concerned about the environmental impact, waste of water, noise and traffic issues that will negatively  impact my community.  I purchased my home in Andalusia CC because it is quite and serene.  I prefer it stays that way.   Honestly, this plan defies all logic.  We are the desert with a delicate ecosystem.  The water usage, the noise,  the traffic, the construction, the ego of surfer joe....please no.  This will forever change our beautiful area. Water  here is a gift and should not be used in such a reckless manner. Almost worse than building this park is getting it  half constructed and for some unforeseen reason ...it is pulled.  IMPERATIVE: neutral EIR.  The LaQuinta Wave Park and STR development, the other Wave Parks planned for the Valley, and the Rancho  Mirage residential development with 34‐acre lagoon, are all absurd  wastes of our aquifer resource The state is in another drought, and water restrictions are in our future. How then can this developer be allowed  to keep pulling water out of the aquifer. It's unconscionable to approve the zoning change for this project. Noise, lights, traffic congestion and all the water conservation challenges in the future so close to my home in  Trilogy!!😩 Everything about this proposed resort makes no sense....Environmentally and just plain common sense...it  doesn't belong here in La Quinta... I agree this project does not belong in this area.  Big money should not be allowed to buy or change peoples  Keep the current zone at Residential.  The wavepark should not be allowed to locate in a residential community.    Put it with other commercial developments.  Misuse of our previous water resources, disruption and damage to desert ecosystem, negative impact on  community quality of life ‐ noise, traffic congestion, security. For the third time I own a place in La Quinta primarily because of the zoning separation of residential housing  and commercial development. To put this gigantic commercial development on top of residents is outrageous.  Any La Quinta elected official that is for this project should be voted out of office. We moved here because La Quinta was a trusted city where we could depend on their planning integrity, and  integrity if the Mayor and Council.  This integrity included a hi end residential golf community ‐ promising a quiet  area to retire and helping others. The city should not break that promise by allowing a rezoning to tourist  etc..Breaking that promise would negatively affect the peaceful retirement promised, but also the future value  of the city’s integrity and home values.  Noise, traffic, lighting, loss of night sky views, bats and bighorn sheep loss of habitat, not just after the fact but  ALL DURING CONSTRUCTION.  Dust, truck pollution, water use.  quality of life  This is the wrong project for La Quinta.  It is a beautiful piece of land in a peaceful setting.  The wave park will  create excessive noise and congestion in a residential community. With two other wave parks planned for the  desert in more commercial settings, this one is simply not needed and should be rejected.    This will create excess noise and traffic congestion in a residential area.  The proposed wave park is not  reflective of the surrounding residential communities.  There are any number of reasons to deny rezoning.  Top among these has to be traffic.  Lack of traffic and the  commensurate tranquility is the number one reason we and our neighbors chose to buy and live in South La  Quinta.  Trilogy at La Quinta is made up of 1238 single family dwellings.  Assuming two persons for each  dwelling, it can be quickly calculated that the four events per year would be like dumping the entire population  of Trilogy on our streets all at once.  In addition to the event attendees, we must add in those individuals staying  in the STVR's (600), the hotel (150 rooms), and the 400 individual proposed homes.  The proposed resort does  not fit into South La Quinta in any way, shape or form.  The proposed rezoning must be denied. I don’t think the Coral Mountain Resort will be good for the quiet community off La Quinta. The Wave project goes against La Quinta Land Planning Use Goal #LU‐1"Land Use compatibility maintain  landscape map and zoning map.  #LU‐2 .4 potential impacts (not addressed fully  in the EIR.)# LU‐3.1a  preservation of neighborhood characteristics and "sense of place". #3.1b compatible with existing  neighborhood. This project belongs in an existing Commercial/Tourist locale.  The developer's requested re‐zoning is completely outside the intended use for the subject parcels, per the La  Quinta master development plan.  Permitting the zoning change will forever change the intended nature of  surrounding land parcels, both developed and planned. Palm Desert Excession noise and traffic.  Too close to residential property and would devalue the property.  I have  experienced other  similar instances and it does not work close to a residential development. I bought my home in the Andalusia Country Club because it is quiet and serene, and I want it to stay that way. Do not want our peaceful quiet area ruined by commercialism! As a frequent visitor to the Valley, it is difficult to understand why a development of this magnitude would be  approved or even considered. All over CA there is a drought. Orchards of fruit and almond trees are being ripped  out over lack of water. Salmon are dying. Disrupting our food supply. Yet this mega water hungry intrusive  unnecessary project development is proposed and considered for approval. This is a truly representative  of a  developer’s greed trying to prevail over protecting the environment and health for the close proximity  residents. Just any one of the increase in traffic noise, dust, pollution and driving safety issues should be enough  to turn down this project proposal. The Valley will lose many of it’s long term residents that support the local  businesses. This is a destination resort that will only benefit the developer not the community. I kindly request  that this whole development permit be denied. Save our Valley and our fragile environment.  I am a member of Andalusia Golf Club.  In short, building the Coral Mountain Surf Resort at this location will  disrupt the serenity of this golf community.   Incompatible with neighborhood, lifestyle and available Coachella Valley water resources/drought conditions. Too much traffic, noise, and light. My thoughts, very similar to those of many members of the LQRRD, are explained in a letter by P. Novak  (myself) and B. Novak to the Desert Sun newspaper shortly after it published S. Barkas' article (late June, 2021)  on the public availability of a recent Environmental Impact Report.  Our letter has been forwarded to the La  Quinta City Council.   P.N.  Submitted opposition letter to Nicole Sauviat Criste and  to the Managing Editor of the Desert Sun. 1. Maintain dark skies  2. Conserve water use  3. Avoid sound pollution (reverberating off mountains)  4. Halt  increase in STVRs (LQ city does a lousy job as it is with monitoring the existing permitted addresses)  5. Keep  residential areas for the current people who live there and for future residents Basically, it is an obnoxious intrusion into the area. The wave park should be in an industrial zoned area near a  freeway.  I hope serious consideration is given to our concerns which have been well documented in the comments above  with which I fully agree. We purchased our home with the knowledge that this area is zoned Low Density Residential, expecting only  residential development.   It's unfair to thousands of property owners to change this, forcing us to sell our  homes and move!  We were here first.  Please deny rezoning  as this operation is a completely inappropriate use of water in the delicate desert  ecosystem .   Our earth is 2/3rds covered in ocean ‐ surfing is an ocean sport ‐ why would we destroy the desert  This rezoning proposal is wrong in so many ways.  The wanton waste of water, our most precious resource in  the desert, the light pollution from 80 foot light towers, the constant pounding of waves on the fragile geology  of the area and the noise pollution on many local communities, just to mention a few. This  is  a  non‐ conforming  use  that does  not  deserve  consideration  by The  city of  la  Quinta.  I fear  that the    city council is  blinded  by  the  prospect  of  bed tax  revenue.  This  project will not  bail out  our  city from  past    financial mistakes. La Quinta.I am opposed to the project for all the reasons expressed in this petition. Noise, water use,  incompatibility with the surrounding residential neighborhoods and the uncertainty of the time line for the build  out. This project does not bring anything positive tot he residents of La Quinta and mars the beauty of Coral  Mountain. Completely inappropriate use of land and water in the desert, and a great way to ruin la quinta  The CVWD's positive input to the City of La Quinta environmental impact study is based partially on imposing  excessive future rate increases for water on all La Quinta residents, thereby forcing them to participate  indirectly to the funding for the senseless project. That is illegal! It would just totally ruin a beautiful part of our La Quinta area, and is not what we need out this way!  Say NO to  this terrible project.....please for our future. La Quinta  This property will negatively  impact the environment especially in a drought.  Loud, crowded, water consumption required to operate Responsible planning and development in an area zoned for low density residential should NOT allow for  rezoning for commercial water park! We purchased our home in Andalusia because of the tranquility of the immediate area we wanted to be away  from traffic, commercial congestion and noise.  We chose to drive 10 minutes further out to avoid this.  We are  adamantly opposed to this project due to the change in zoning from low density golf course community to a  commercial development.  It will change our area to the opposite of why we chose to live there. Could you have picked a quieter corner of the desert to put this development/amusement park? I have many  concerns starting w/ the zone change. How can people trust that their city won't pull the rug out from under  their feet in doing a change like this?  People make huge investments to buy a home in a quiet neighborhood  and the city unilaterally changes the zoning?  And of all things a Surf Park?!  using our precious drinking water, in  a serious drought, with light poles 80 feet high so people can surf at night!  Where in the world does anyone surf  at night?  I would bet that every house with a view of Coral Mtn. will see those lights day AND night!  What  happened to dark skies?  What about the bats who live around this area?  The biologists who studied the bat  population in this area said night lights would cause problems for the bats‐a protected species.  The noise of the  surf pool open from 7am to 10 pm everyday of the year, not to mention the calling of the wave every 3 or 5  minutes?  People cheering or hooting and hollering, and loud music.  Watch a video from the surf pool in  Lemoore, CA if you want to get an idea of that. The Environmental report said the Mountains would absorb the  sound.  On what planet does stone absorb sound?  The noise will ricochet around the mountains.  The  Environmental report also said there would be little increase in traffic and only a stop sign would be needed at  58th and Madison.  Can you imagine 2500 people coming to an event w/o a stop light on that intersection!   Traffic would be backed up to the Polo grounds!  And what about the "resort" itself.  A hotel 4 stories tall‐tell  me where a 4 story building is in all of La Quinta and this one will block the view of SO many homes  in nearby  developments.  Then there's the cabanas, a fancy name for Short Term Vacation Rentals!  La Quinta has paused  STVR license approval yet in this location that's all there will be!  The sub phase development will create more  noise and chaos for years to come.  And I'm not sure who wants to buy a multi million dollar home located next  to an amusement park.  Will those homes ever be built?  Please, please stop this before it starts.  It is wrong for  Commercial development within an established residential community is illogical and goes against the LA Quinta  2035 Plan. This Project, if rezoning is allowed to take place, does not fit. This is "not about MY backyard" ‐ it should not be  in anyone's back yard except where zoning currently allows for.  The 2035 La Quinta General Plan was adopted  for a reason ‐ PLEASE KEEP THE ZONING AS IS.  Additionally, please do not allow for Projects that take our  drinking water from our aquifer.  A responsible Developer can CHOOSE to put in a "drought conscious" golf  course ‐ or  can choose  less water intensive features for the development.  Times have changed. The additional traffic deterioration of our night sky the noise is not appropriate for a residential community. We bought our home w the understanding that the property by Coral Mountain was zoned for residential not  for a commercial water park. The lights will obscure our dark sky evenings. The wave announcements will  destroy our quiet environment. The water usage is a disgrace for a state that suffers from drought. The city  members of La Quinta cannot be this stupid/careless  or greedy, Big money must be influencing this process.  The City council has a stewardship to protect the natural beauty of Coral Mountain, and to maintain the  integrity of what’s right for La Quinta. Noise, Traffic, Lights, Events  For the myriad of reasons that the organization of LA QUINTA RESIDENTS FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT of  which I agree as laid out we are adamantly opposed to the proposed Wave project. We bought our home in this  La Quinta development for the tranquility and the Wave project is directly in front of our home. This project was  never disclosed to us at the time of sale. So irresponsible to consider a project of this scope when Climate concerns are real and water in California is on  a path extreme drought conditions indefinitely  ‐ WHY, WHY this alone shows irresponsible judgement never  mind the other concerns regarding traffic, noise, lighting etc.... Please do not be on the wrong‐side of La  Quinta's master plan.  Please please do not turn a long term peaceful residential environment into a commercial short term stay  entertainment center We bought in this area as it is residential and was always zoned for that.  Putting a commercial Wave Park or  amusement park in our area is ridiculous! A city creates a master plan which establishes zoning regulations to control future development.  People depend  on those zoning regulations when investment decisions are made.  A change from residential zoning to  commercial/resort zoning after years of residential development would be a catastrophe for the people who  have invested in the residential zone.   This is the wrong project for this area on all fronts. Would completely take away from what La Qunita is, has  been and should be in the future.  The entire project is terrible and the wrong project for our beautiful city! I have already written to the city council to voice my concerns about changing the community from a high end,  serene residential area to a carnival. If I would have known this, I wouldn’t have bought in La Quinta. I believe  this will impact future buyers that desire a peaceful, luxurious community.   No, for all the reason cited above. This is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong time. I am concerned about the excessive water usage and the amount of development and traffic it will bring to the  area.  LA Quinta is NOT the place for this. Stop this change in zoning, stop this water park circus and do not allow any night time activists on this site, no  Short Term Rentals, no parties, no concerts etc.   We do not want Coral Mountain near our homes in La Quinta! Noise, traffic general degrading of our community. Totally irresponsible,  The zoning should stay the same.  To change after the others are already there is not something equitable.   There is surely other areas for something like this to be put into. This project is totally out of step with everything that is going wrong with our environment in the State of  California. We don't need or want this type of development here in La Quinta. I am definitely against this project  .                      This project is totally out of step with everything that is going wrong with our enviroment in the  State of California     The development will forever change the tranquility of this área. The impacts will be much too severe. This is a terrible idea!  please show some consideration for the homeowners in LaQuinta!  We bought in this area because of the quiet and peaceful surroundings as well as the natural beauty.  This new  development will negatively impact the reasons we bought here.  The size of the proposed development is too  large for this area.  The number of units they are proposing, the hotel and the size of the wave pool will  dramatically increase traffic.  The structures they are proposing will absolutely impact the natural beauty of the  area.  The wave pool and the entertainment that comes with will certainly impact the quite nature of the area.   This land has it current zoning for a reason—to maintain the quiet and natural setting of the surrounding area.   Please do not allow the rezoning happen.  This is an area of La Quinta that should be kept from any further large  development so it keeps natural charm and surroundings. Because there are so many other sites that ARE ZONED for this project, move it there! We don’t want the  disruption, or traffic, noise, lights, people, visitors, potential crime…take this project to the area zoned for it.  Across the 10. It’s that easy.  Traffic will shut down on Madison Ave. It will deplete our water resources which have previously been  protected. It will interfere with our use and enjoyment to our home due to light and noise pollution.  It will  create party central at this venue which is not what La Quinta wants.  It is unfortunate that I feel (as do many other LQ residents I've conversed with) that the City Council has already  made up its mind regarding this project.      It seems as though the City Council is considering the potential  financial impact without factoring in the negative environmental aspects (projected water use being an amazing  waste, in spite of what the very brief draft EIR states) and overwhelming annoyance on the part of the residents.    We, the residents, DO NOT WANT this type of commercial and recreational development on City land zoned for  residential.  I am also concerned about the noise generated by Wave Announcements.  Is the City aware that  Coral Mountain already bounces and echos sound from people walking nearby?  I did not buy my home in 2007  to have a WATER PARK across the street.    Frankly, it is a total mystery as to why the City Council has not killed  this project already.  I highly suspect this wave park, if approved, will become an abandoned eyesore 15‐20  years out as the developer's and users' enthusiasm fades and water becomes a scarce resource.   We paid a premium to have a quiet and tranquil environment in the house we purchased.  We understood that  future development projects would be done in alignment with the rules and approaches that have served La  Quinta well over the past 50+ years.  The wave pool is not in line with the current tenor of La Quinta and we ask  that you do not allow such a different and short term place to be built here. It is unfortunate that I feel (as do many other LQ residents I've conversed with) that the City Council has already  made up its mind regarding this project.      It seems as though the City Council is considering the potential  financial impact without factoring in the negative environmental aspects (projected water use being an amazing  waste, in spite of what the very brief draft EIR states) and overwhelming annoyance on the part of the residents.    We, the residents, DO NOT WANT this type of commercial and recreational development on City land zoned for  residential.  I am very concerned about the light pollution caused by the light towers destroying the evening /  night ambiance.  I am also concerned about the noise generated by Wave Announcements.  Is the City aware  that Coral Mountain already bounces and echos sound from people walking nearby?  I did not buy my home in  2007 to have a WATER PARK across the street.    Frankly, it is a total mystery as to why the City Council has not  killed this project already.  I think that one only needs to "follow the money".   I highly suspect this wave park, if  approved, will become an abandoned eyesore 15‐20 years out as the developer's and users' enthusiasm fades  and water becomes a scarce resource.   It's absolutely preposterous and beyond irresponsible to allow an amusement‐style wave park in this beautiful,  quiet and tranquil part of the desert (or in any CA desert for that matter) during an unprecedented drought and  increasingly record‐breaking hot temps that are only getting worse each year. The fact that the city of LQ and  developers are somehow able and willing to circumvent or change zoning laws demonstrates such a selfish  money grab and complete indifference to the protection and preservation of local aquifers, natural desert  habitat and dark night skies that it is beyond my comprehension.  The purpose of moving to La Quinta was for peace and quiet and the beauty of the area   It why we left LA   We  are in our 70’s and I have severe health issues.   The peaceful environment is why we purchased our new home  in la Quinta  We built our retirement home in Andalusia because of the serenity of the Coral mountains in an area zoned for  residential homes and golf courses and away from all commercial activities.  This is like dropping Disneyland in a  residential area.  Please don’t ruin it for thousands of like minded people. This project is inconsistent with the surrounding communities.  We are not opposed to development of this  parcel what I am opposed to is having a “amusement park” when I and my neighbors purchase our homes with  the understanding that  the development would consist of single family homes and a golf course.  This project  would bring a permanent disruption to our lovely area.  I bought in this lovely area to get away from the noise,  pollution and traffic of Los Angeles.  This irresponsible project would create all these problems and in addition  rob us of our precious drinking water in the middle of a record breaking drought.  How irresponsible is this.  La  Quinta has a responsibility to preserve our drinking water not hand it over to an out of touch developer to  create another white elephant in the desert. Its all about money money money and to allow this project to go through would be for all the wrong reasons.  Our community is a peaceful place that most of us have worked our entire lives with this type of living as our  goal. This money maker would change the entire atmosphere of what LaQuinta is all about. The Gem if the  Desert will no longer be a Gem by letting this happen. Rethink‐Rethink‐Rethink   I am a new homeowner in Andalusia Country Club. I explored several home purchase options in La Quinta and  the peace and tranquility of Andalusia and its surroundings were a major driving force in my purchase decision. I  think it would be a travesy to allow a wave park and resort facility in the land across from Andalusia. It would  absolutely turn our existence upside down.  This is a major NO, NO, NO..  Bright Lights, lots of traffic, lots of noise, already have water shortage....Bad, Bad idea NO, NO, NO!!!!!!! I support responsible people who stand up with facts against an irresponsible project!  Fritz Bachli, Prof. of  Economics and Environmental Science Please see my letter submitted to the City of La Quinta.  No Wave project. All the above ‐ this rezoning is illegal ‐ the city has no right to approve this No on Noise Pollution, Water Usage (during drought), Stadium Lighting, Traffic Increase! Trilogy Residents will  suffer! Our peaceful retirement community will be destroyed! Property needs to stay residential.  No rezoning for a Wavepark as it will not be a good fit for that property as  demonstrated by multiple issues. The reason I am opposed to this development is that it does not belong in an area of La Quinta that is zoned  Residential. There are many more issues involved with this development that I have voiced to the consulting Co  reviewing the project as well as the Mayor and City Council members for the city of la Quinta.  I have been fighting this from the beginning and agree with all of your points. We don't need this ! This area is residential and needs to remain residental to preserve the calm and quiet homeowners sought when  they moved here.. The irresponsible use of water in a drought plagued environment is ridiculous and terribly  short sighted. This Valley is an artificial oasis, dependent on an ancient aquifer accumulated over thousands of years. Now, the  CVWA is allowing the squandering of that potable water for projects like this.  The aquifer is not being  replenished‐‐impossible just considering the 120+ little‐used golf courses wasting millions of gallons a day.  Flow  from the Colorado River will continue to diminish‐‐affecting all the agriculture in the Valley.  The 34 acre  "lagoon" being constructed in the development on former Annenberg land in Rancho Mirage is another example  of absurd water waste.  This Valley will eventually have a water problem without a solution. Rezoning this property is the WRONG decision. My future votes will be predicated on the actions of the city  council on this issue. Say NO! Not good for the environment or our quiet section of our city With all the available commercial space along CA‐111 it is outrageous and totally unacceptable to invade the  residential neighborhoods.  The growth of La Quinta has widely separated residential from commercial, why  upset that plan.   Not to mention conservation or the environment.   For all reasons mentioned  in your website. Noise, congestion and short term rentals so close to our community  year round.  La Quinta: We live in a desert!!!!!!! My primary concern is the irresponsible exploitation of our precious water resources. Secondly, this area is  zoned residential, not commercial. Most of us live in retirement communities because we relish the peace and  quiet of our desert. If I wanted to live next door to Disneyland, I'd have moved to Anaheim.  I cannot imagine the city of La Quinta approving this project during a time of such severe and terrifying drought.  It is basically stealing precious drinking water from the whole west coast.   The zoning of this project will have to  be changed, too. The property is zoned for homes, not for commercial use.  It will decimate peace and quiet for  surrounding residents with its noise, traffic, and light pollution. It will destroy neighboring property values.  In  sum, I cannot imagine approving this development and still being able to sleep at night.   Absolutely the wrong type of development for this area. Water wasting, light pollution, and noise pollution and  Resort type mentality to ruin a very peaceful setting that we have enjoyed and cherished since we purchased 8  years ago. This area needs development but only one that will conform to what is already in this area now.    After listening to a recent presentation by the Developers regarding their plans for this proposed development, I  cannot think of a more irresponsible use of such a precious resource of WATER! This type of development and  irresponsible use of such a scare and critical  commodity  should not only be banned from the Coachella Valley,  it should be banned from the entire state of California as well as All of the Western states where water is in a  critical shortage of supply.  In addition I learned from the developers presentation:  1. the hours of operation  will be 7a.m. to 10p.m. 365 days per year, not 7a.m. to 5p.m. as advertised  2.Major events attracting thousands  to a residential area is a prime focus and will not be just a few times a year event  3. The wave feature is only  the first of a multitude of sporting events and activities that will be developed and offered in the future.  4. The  water use and evaporation rate is predicated upon the Livermore location with average high temperatures of 85  degrees. Here in the Coachella Valley we have over 120 days of 100 plus degree weather plus wind. The  projected water use/evaporation rates are completely inaccurate.  5. This development is a completely private  member only use enterprise. There will be no direct benefit, or even available use of this facility by citizens of La  Quinta. this is a members only Private Enterprise, yet they will be using valuable and scarce drinking water  directly from our aquafer. Think about it, thousands of our fellow Coachella Valley residents have no access to  clean, safe drinking water, yet this private enterprise will be allowed to squander this precious natural resource  on what.... a 20 second wave ride!!!! This is obscene!  Vote NO on changing the zoning that will allow this  project!  Vote No on this project!  This project is in the wrong place, at the wrong time, and is the wrong use of  the last large natural, stunning open space left in La Quinta. I encourage the City council members to live up the  the slogan of our city name...La Quinta... The Gem of the Desert. As city leaders you need to put the desires and  well being of your citizens ahead of MONEY. You need to protect the quiet, light pollution free, noise free,  peaceful residential ambience south La Quinta residents currently enjoy and expect. That is why we bought and  invested here!  Go do the right thing and just say NO! I purchased my house to stay away from the bustle of city noise and development!  This will forever affect our  lives and value of our neighborhood! Indio The sanction of a development that is scheduled to consume a massive amount of water for recreational  purposes ‐ in a location where water resources are scarce ‐ during a period in history when water resources are  historically low ‐ would be negligence at an aggrevated level.  We have a responsibility in our governance of land  and resources.  Let's exercise that governance judiciously by facilitating developments that are respectful of our  resources and natural environment.  Having previously sanctioned developments that consume large amounts  of water is not an excuse to continue that practice. Let's have La Quinta be the leaders of responsible  development in the Coachella Valley; not the contributors to waste.   You are considering changing the zoning from a residential area. This development will add a lot of noise and  traffic to our area. Not the right place for this development.  We are in a drought, I do not want the increase of traffic nor the noise. This does not belong in our  neighborhood. How many wave parks does the desert need? Palm Springs, Palm Desert and Coachella... what  sense does any of this make. We need to conserve water!  I want the city of LQ to leave the zoning as is.  We were attracted to La Quinta as a golf community and love the landscaping.  We love the starry skies at night.    The Citrus golf course is already involved in litigation over water usage from the aquifer.  How could we possibly  support using this much water for a wave park during a drought?  It’s irresponsible and we strongly object to  changing zoning laws Water Usage and Noise Pollution, not to mention traffic. We specifically chose this area to purchase our "final" home because it is so serene, beautiful, and neighbor  friendly.  It is difficult to find an area that still conveys a "small town feeling", this area spoke to us.  This wave  park does not belong in a quiet residential neighborhood.  The lights will destroy our star lit night skies, the  noise will destroy our quiet peace, the major in‐flux of people that do not live in the area on a regular basis  places our neighborhood at risk for increased police activity, the traffic during and after construction will result  in majorly increased traffic sounds and more wear and tear on our streets.  Right now there is a city in Central  California that does not have water due to well malfunction and drought conditions.  How can the city justify  allowing a wave park using so much of our potable water for recreation?  Golf resorts can at least use non‐ potable water.   I am begging, please do not destroy our peaceful community.  Virginia M. Nelson, Santerra The City Council has no right to impose on a majority of citizens such a project, against any ecological  justification, destroying the scenery and wasting unbelievably amount of water at a time of hard drought. I  believe money is behind this project and the decision makers will have one day to explain and justify their huge  Increased noise, traffic, water usage in what is clearly a residential area. Find another more suitable location so  as not to destroy the tranquility of this area! This is not compatible with the neighborhood or present zoning.    The area adjacent to the Coral Mountain west of Madison Avenue and south of Avenue 58 is currently zoned for  development as a low‐density golf community similar to those surrounding this location (Andalusia CC, Trilogy,  The Quarry, etc.).  Many of the local residents in this neighborhood own properties in this area in order to enjoy  a pre‐retirement or retirement lifestyle. Over a year ago the property in question was purchased by new owners  with a plan to develop a surf community with hotel and community amenities as well as a home building  component. It appears that this development will be the first attempt at incorporating this new wave  technology within an established residential area.    The developers described the overall objective to “create an  upscale private resort community.” After having studied the February 2021 Notice of Preparation, we feel this  will not at all resemble the beautiful upscale private communities that surround it. The developer is asking for  31% of this land to be zoned “Tourist Commercial” (121 of 386 acres). Phase One of the development will  consist of a wave machine attraction, a 150‐person hotel, 104 casita unit rentals, and what looks like  approximately 25 residences. There is also a public restaurant and shopping planned, and as hoped by the  developer, numerous annual events to draw in more public to the area.    At the center of our opposition, of  course, is the attraction being built on this commercial tourist land, the surf‐wave machine. We are extremely  concerned about this as an attraction, and feel very strongly that this is an irresponsible development that  should not be allowed to continue. Basic science shows that sound travels much farther at night than during the  day, as soundwaves bend downwards towards the cooler ground. In addition, the 80‐foot lights that are to  reflect on the wave machine will undoubtedly further add light pollution to the beautiful coral mountain and  dull our beautiful starry black night skies.  The promotion material from the developer for Coral Mountain  Resort says the Resort will include a "Surf Stadium". In fact, the largest Surf Stadium/Wave Basin in the world  right in the middle of a low‐density residential area.     We are La Quinta residents for responsible development.   We want La Quinta to remain The Gem of The Desert and we want the Coral Mountain to remain the gem of La  1 From:Monika Radeva Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 11:52 AM To:Gianna Wright Cc:Laurie McGinley; Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner Subject:Wright, Gianna: 6/6/2022 Written Comments PH 1 DO NOT APPROVE THE CORAL MOUNTAIN WAVE RESORT Good afternoon, The written public comments provided via your email below will be provided to the City Council at the 6/7/2022 regular meeting and will be included in the public record for the meeting. Thank you. Monika Radeva, CMC | City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: Gianna Wright <giannawright03@gmail.com>   Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 11:51 AM  To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: DO NOT APPROVE THE CORAL MOUNTAIN WAVE RESORT  ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  From a concerned La Quinta resident          Do not approve the Coral Mountain wave resort, it will ruin our city. Our aquifer cannot handle the extra water  usage on top of other cities' already approved water parks/attractions. The evaporation rate would be immense,  especially in the height of summer. It would waste millions of gallons of water each day whereas La Quinta citizens are  urged to conserve. Our electric grid also cannot handle the 750 STVR and wave park electrical usage. Residents are asked to also avoid using energy during certain hours. An even more strained electric grid will cause more blackouts during  summer, when a working AC is crucial for everyone. The money gained from this resort will not pay for increased water  bills for our residents, and we can't even afford to use the resort.         La Quinta will become the next Salton Sea, the resort is unsustainable. If we decimate our aquifer, we won't be able  to afford to live here anymore, wealthy vacationers won't support this city enough to offset the damages this resort will  bring. Do not approve of this project. The residents who support it falsely believe they will be able to take advantage of  the resort, which they will not. Supporters also do not understand the damage it could cause, I have seen this through  countless uninformed posts on local social media.         I am studying for my environmental science major, and this project is everything I fear for our future. Money cannot  be an incentive for environmental and economic catastrophe.   Please listen,  Gianna Wright  1 From:John Pena Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 7:59 AM To:Gianna Wright Cc:Monika Radeva Subject:RE: DO NOT APPROVE THE CORAL MOUNTAIN WAVE RESORT Gianna,  Thank you for taking the time to express your views on the Coral Mountain project. Although council members cannot  pre‐determine how we will vote on a project, I can assure you that as a lifelong desert resident I take very seriously the  effects of any project that comes before the city council, it's impact on our natural resources, crime and public safety,  the environment, traffic, and benefit to the community.  As with all items that come before the council, I will consider all  the information presented by all interested parties for this project.  Also, for future reference, please feel free to send or  copy the City Clerk’s Office so that your communications can conveniently be included as part of the record for  correspondence received in connection with this project, which can be sent to:  CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov.  Thank  you again for reaching out to share your concerns.  John Peña | Member of the City Council City of La Quinta  78‐495 Calle Tampico | La Quinta, CA 92253  Ph. 760.777.7030  www.laquintaca.gov   www.playinlaquinta.com  From: Gianna Wright <giannawright03@gmail.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 6:43 PM  To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Robert Radi <Rradi@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick  <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>  Subject: DO NOT APPROVE THE CORAL MOUNTAIN WAVE RESORT  2 ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when  opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **    From a concerned La Quinta resident            Do not approve the Coral Mountain wave resort, it will ruin our city. Our aquifer cannot handle the extra  water usage on top of other cities' already approved water parks/attractions. The evaporation rate would be  immense, especially in the height of summer. It would waste millions of gallons of water each day whereas La  Quinta citizens are urged to conserve. Our electric grid also cannot handle the 750 STVR and wave park electrical  usage. Residents are asked to also avoid using energy during certain hours. An even more strained electric grid  will cause more blackouts during summer, when a working AC is crucial for everyone. The money gained from  this resort will not pay for increased water bills for our residents, and we can't even afford to use the resort.           La Quinta will become the next Salton Sea. If we decimate our aquifer, we won't be able to afford to live  here anymore, wealthy vacationers won't support this city enough to offset the damages this resort will bring.  Do not approve of this project. The residents who support it falsely believe they will be able to take advantage of  the resort, which they will not. Supporters also do not understand the damage it could cause, I have seen this  through countless uninformed posts on the Nextdoor app.           I am studying for my environmental science major, and this project is everything I fear for our future. Money  cannot be an incentive for environmental and economic catastrophe.     Please listen,  Gianna Wright  Public Hearing Item No. 1 Comments 1 From:James Vaughn <JVaughn@szrlaw.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 9:10 AM To:Monika Radeva Cc:Nicole Criste (Contract Planner); Cheri Flores; John Gamlin; Witherspoon, Michelle; Tony Locacciato - Meridian Consultants LLC (tlocacciato@meridianconsultantsllc.com); Garrett Simon; Rick Zeilenga Subject:Coral Mountain Resort - Supplemental Response to April 26, 2022 letter from Mitchell Tsai Attachments:CM Resort HazMat Memo_060622.pdf; West Tract 300300-005_18-08-702_Phase_I_ESA_080618F.pdf; West Tract 300300-007_18-09-703R_Phase_II_091718F.pdf ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hi Monika,   Mitchell Tsai submitted a supplemental comment letter dated April 26, 2022, and in that letter, he requested disclosure  of any Phase I or Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) prepared for the project site.  Although not required  under CEQA, we are voluntarily submitting the 2018 Phase I and Phase II ESAs prepared for the project site, which  further support the conclusion in the EIR that the project site does not contain any conditions that would create a  potentially significant hazard to the public or the environment.    These reports, and the accompanying memorandum from Tony Locacciato at Meridian Consultants, provide further  substantial evidence that respond to Mr. Tsai’s request, and clarify and amplify the information in the Hazards and  Hazardous Materials chapter of the EIR, but do not contain any “significant new information” as defined in CEQA  Guidelines 15088.5.  The Statement of Qualifications of Mr. Locacciato and Meridian Consultants, demonstrating their  experience and expertise in documenting compliance with CEQA’s requirements, including in the area of Hazards and  Hazardous Materials, are included with the attached memorandum from Meridian Consultants.   As these materials do not evidence any substantial adverse environmental effects of the project or a feasible way to  mitigate or avoid such an effect, these materials do not require recirculation of the Draft EIR or any further action by the  City.  Rather, we are requesting that these materials be included in the administrative record for the Coral Mountain  Resort project in the interest of full disclosure, and to ensure that the last‐minute questions raised by Mr. Tsai do not go  unanswered.    Please let me know if you have any questions or have any trouble accessing these documents.   Thanks,   Jim  James D. Vaughn, Esq. Stowell, Zeilenga, Ruth, Vaughn & Treiger LLP 2 jvaughn@szrlaw.com l www.szrlaw.com Office: 805.446.1496 l Direct: 805.446.7609 l Mobile 805.551.0688 4695 MacArthur Court 4590 East Thousand Oaks Blvd. Suite 200 Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Westlake Village, California 91362    From: John Gamlin <jgamlin@coralmountain.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 8:55 PM  To: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Nicole Criste <ncriste@terranovaplanning.com>; Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; James Vaughn  <JVaughn@szrlaw.com>  Subject: CM PPT Presentation     Hi Monika,    Sorry to do this…I have been running the PPT over and over preparing for tomorrow and the dang embedded MP4  movie file freezes and skips for some reason.    I replaced the file in this updated version:    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/fg8uykste5a1fyef600ib/CoralMtn_PPT_CC6.07.22_FINAL_v.2_UPDATED.pptx?dl=0&rlk ey=w6ihoub9xgu3znboxk74t7gmg     We also had a few minor, but important changes to our Rebuttal slides:    https://www.dropbox.com/s/98j3c83w74atfpm/Vaughn%20Rebuttal%20Slides.pdf%20‐%206‐7‐ 22%20City%20Council_JG_REVISED.pdf?dl=0    Would you be so kind as to DELETE the PPT file you currently have and replace it with the version above?    Same for the Rebuttal slides.    Thanks, and apologies again for the inconvenience.    See you tomorrow!    JG  LOS ANGELES 706 S. Hill Street, 11th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90014 (213) 335-3434 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, CA 91361 (805) 367-5720 MEMORANDUM Date: June 6, 2022 To: Nicole Criste, Contract Planner, City of La Quinta From: Tony Locacciato, AICP, Partner Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report Hazards & Hazardous Materials Analysis This memo addresses comments in the April 26, 2022 letter from Mitchell M. Tsai submitted on behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters on the Coral Mountain Resort Final EIR. Specifically, this memo addresses comments in Section III. of this letter on Hazardous Materials, Hazards and Health Risks. These comments suggest that a proper baseline regarding the Project’s hazardous materials, hazards and health risks should be based on environmental site assessment (“ESA”) completed for the Project site and that the review of government databases that identify contaminated sites included in the City’s EIR is not adequate because the site was formerly used for agriculture, which indicates a likelihood of potentially hazardous waste being present on the Project site. This comment quotes a portion of the discussion on the potential for pesticides and herbicides to be present on the site due to the historic agricultural use of the site on page 4.8-24 of the Draft EIR, but does not include this portion of the analysis: Historical aerial imagery from 1996 indicates that the site had been cleared of all agricultural remnants prior to 1996. At this time, no agricultural equipment or infrastructure are present onsite. The presence of fertilizer or related chemical storage related to farming activities do not exist onsite. Chemicals previously utilized during agricultural operations have likely dissipated to insignificant levels due to the inactivity of the site for over 20 years. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant chemicals associated with previous agricultural activities exist onsite. The comment from Mr. Tsai implies an ESA is necessary to provide the information needed to support adequate analysis of the potential for significant impacts related to the presence of hazardous materials on the Project site. This is not true; CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines do not identify or discuss ESAs as a required element of the analysis of potential hazards and hazardous materials impacts. In fact, the review of government databases completed to support the preparation of the EIR is directly responsive to this question on Hazards and Hazardous Materials in the environmental checklist included in Appendix G to the CEQA Guidelines: IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Page 2 Coral Mountain Resort EIR Hazards and Hazardous Materials Analysis Based on a review of these government databases and consideration of the past agricultural history of the site, no significant impacts were identified in the City’s EIR. While preparation Phase I and II ESAs and incorporation of information from ESAs is not required by CEQA or the CEQA Guidelines, a Phase I ESA of the Project site completed in August 2018 1 and a Phase II ESA 2 completed in September 2018 have been provided to the City of La Quinta to provide additional information on the presence of pesticide and herbicide residue on the Project site. The Phase I ESA documents the historical use of the site for agriculture and the Phase II ESA includes the results of analysis of soil samples collected from the Project site. The soil samples were tested for the presence of Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs). OCPs detected in these soil samples included DDE, DDT, DDD, Dieldrin and Chlordane. None of the concentrations detected for any of these OCP compounds exceeded the Regional Screening Level for Residential [RSL-R], a US EPA guideline for evaluating whether concentrations pose a health hazard for residential land use. In other words, the Phase I and Phase II ESAs confirm the conclusion in the EIR that development of the project site does not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Total DDT (TDE), which is the additive sum of the DDT, DDE and DDD concentrations, is the Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) that defines whether a compound constitutes regulated waste under California law. Some of the soil samples exceeded the TTLC for TDE, which means that any off-site transport or disposal of the soil would require further testing to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. It is important to note that the TTLC is not a threshold that indicates the concentrations pose a health hazard for development or residential land uses. Rather, exceeding this limit affects how that soil that may be exported from the site. Because soil on the site may exceed the TTLC for TDE, the Phase II ESA recommends that any soil planned to be exported off the current site be tested for OCPs prior to export. If found to exceed regulatory limits, the soil should be manifested appropriately to comply with applicable regulations on the handling and transport of regulated waste under California law. The results of the Phase II ESA soil investigations support the conclusion in the Draft EIR that the potential presence of pesticide and herbicide residue on the Project site will not result in any potentially significant human health impacts. In addition, the Phase I ESA provides further evidence that the Project site poses no other significant health hazards, including from soil contamination from petroleum products. This report found no evidence of “the presence of drums, storage tanks, drywells, potential PCB-containing equipment (such as transformers). sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stained soil, stressed vegetation (other than due to weather), or onsite septic systems” (p. 1 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California, August 3, 2018, Earth Systems Pacific. 2 Revised Report of Preliminary Phase II Investigation for Organochlorine Pesticides 377.206 Acres West of Madison W of Madison Street, S of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California, Revised September 17, 2018, Earth Systems Pacific. Page 3 Coral Mountain Resort EIR Hazards and Hazardous Materials Analysis 19). The only recognized environmental conditions (RECs) identified in the Phase I report are the potential for hazardous pesticide residue in the soil (which was further evaluated and determined to not pose a health risk, as described above), and typical conditions that are addressed through compliance with standard regulatory requirements (abandoned water wells, lead based paint, and the potential for underground storage tanks). By way of example, if the prior farming operations included an underground fuel storage tank (even though the report found no evidence of such USTs), and that UST was discovered during grading or other ground disturbing activities, existing regulations require a removal permit issued by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, removal by a licensed contractor with hazardous substance certification, and inspection, testing and reporting in compliance with County and State requirements (see, e.g., California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16, Section 2672, and Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Material Management Division, Informational Bulletin on “Underground Storage Tank Guidelines to Closure by Removal”). Mr. Tsai’s April 26, 2022 letter also asserts that the City’s EIR should include an evaluation of the Project’s construction workers’ potential occupational exposure to any contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) that may be present on the Project site while building the Project, including exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) to address the potential for health risk impacts. However, there is no evidence of the existence of such contaminants on the Project site, nor are these contaminants consistent with the prior or current uses on the site. The attached Center for Disease Control (CDC) fact sheet on Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) states that per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of chemicals used to make fluoropolymer coatings and products that resist heat, oil, stains, grease, and water. Fluoropolymer coatings can be in a variety of products. These include clothing, furniture, adhesives, food packaging, heat-resistant non-stick cooking surfaces, and the insulation of electrical wire. This factsheet states that PFAS persist in the environment and exposure in people can occur by consuming PFAS-contaminated water or food. Exposure may also result by using products that contain PFAS. It is important to note that the exposure pathways to PFAs identified by the CDC do not include exposure to PFAs in soil. Since PFAs are chemicals used to make fluoropolymer coatings and products, these chemicals would not have been used in the practice of agriculture and, for this reason, there is no information or evidence that these chemicals may be present in soil on the Project site or that short term exposure to these substances during construction activities could result in any health risks to construction workers. For these reasons, no evaluation of the potential for health risk impacts from the potential presence of CECs is required in the City’s EIR as there is no evidence of either the presence of CECs on the Project site or the potential for significant health risk impacts from CECs. Statement of Qualifications 2022 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5/ Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Meridian Consultants LLC is an industry leader in the fields of community, environmental, and natural resource planning. Meridian Consultants offer a diverse experience in assisting public agencies, private businesses, and landowners throughout California in meeting the challenges of entitlement and regulatory compliance. Our team has extensive experience in land use planning, environmental review, and natural resource management. Our experience includes the successful environmental review and entitlement of some of the largest and most complex projects in California. Meridian also assists our clients with processing local, state, and federal permits under a variety of regulations; stakeholder outreach; mitigation implementation; and the preparation of a wide range of supporting technical studies. Meridian has expertise in the preparation of a broad range of environmental documents to meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Our team has consistently been at the forefront of emerging issues, such as climate change and water supply sustainability, and we are regularly sought out for our CEQA expertise and technical capabilities to address complex and controversial projects. Our partners have an extensive history of successful work on major projects subject to intense public and legal scrutiny. Our technical expertise and experience is matched by our ability to communicate planning and environmental information in well-organized and straightforward reports and presentations that produce successful outcomes. Experience. Expertise. Excellence. Firm Profile STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5 / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Meridian Consultants provides its clients with a wide range of services including: • Strategic Compliance Planning and Management • CEQA/NEPA Compliance • Regulatory Permitting Services • Land Use Planning • Noise Studies • Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Studies • Water Rights Permitting Services and Water Banking and Transfer Consulting • Water Supply Assessments and Verifications • Mitigation Implementation and Monitoring • Public Outreach and Facilitation Strategic Compliance Planning and Management The partners of Meridian Consulting excel at assisting our clients in navigating the environmental compliance process deliberately and strategically. Through hands-on collaboration, we work with our clients to identify key issues and stakeholders and develop a strategy to ensure efficient and timely completion of the various permits, environmental, and regulatory compliance processes required for each project. This includes early evaluation of project constraints and opportunities; dialogue with regulatory agencies and other interested and involved parties; and coordination of scheduling of key tasks and deliverables, such as CEQA documentation and permit applications, to avoid unnecessary delays. Early input from agency and other stakeholders can help identify ways of modifying a project to reduce environmental impacts and minimize potential cost, schedule, and litigation issues while making sure that project objectives are met. Meridian Consultants assists our clients by identifying all processing and review requirements, technical information needed, and team members required at the beginning of the project. Developing and maintaining project schedules by actively managing the activities of the project team is a primary focus of the Meridian Consultants approach. CEQA/NEPA Compliance Achieving CEQA and NEPA compliance are fundamental to the success of our client’s planning and infrastructure projects. Our team has prepared CEQA and NEPA documents for a wide variety of projects throughout California. We take pride in our ability to turn smaller documents around in a quick, cost-effective manner without sacrificing Services and Expertise STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5 / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com quality. Our partners have provided expert and responsive assistance with the full spectrum of CEQA and NEPA compliance documents, ranging from Notices of Exemption or Exclusion to Initial Studies and Environmental Assessments to complex Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), and joint documents for major projects. Regulatory Permitting Services As part of our services, we are able to work with a variety of regulatory permitting and agency negotiation services. We understand the need for efficient and solution-oriented agency coordination and are known for our ability to work productively with resource agency staff. When regulatory permits are required, we are able to call on a combination of outstanding technical expertise and solid regulatory skills, ensuring successful project implementation. Land Use Planning Meridian Consultants offer expertise in all aspects of the land use planning process, including preparation and amendment of General Plans and Specific Plans, preparation of land use and project opportunity and constraint studies, identification of entitlements required for projects, and assistance with processing. Noise Studies Meridian Consultants has the capability to evaluate noise sources associated with a range of projects, from special events to spectator sports facilities, land development, and vehicle traffic. All measurements are taken in accordance with accepted methodologies such as ISO or ASTM, using Type I/II integrating sound level meters. Evaluations are made in reference to community planning standards, such as local noise control ordinances and the California Model Community Noise Control Ordinance and are based on accepted community noise equivalent level/day-night average sound level (CNEL/Ldn) measurement methodology. Meridian Consultants utilizes computer models to predict noise impacts from increased traffic volumes or other activities associated with proposed land uses. Anticipated noise levels are projected with respect to parcel boundaries or planimetric features and in accordance with applicable regulations or client objectives. Predictive studies may address a variety of variables, such as traffic volumes, vehicle mix, stationary source operation patterns, topographic conditions, and mitigation options. • Noise level management • Strategic sampling • Monitoring • Predictive modeling • National, state, and/or local Register resource evaluations • Noise contour mapping • Attenuation/Control plans Meridian Consultants staff has prepared Noise Control Plans as part of mitigation requirements and conducts long- term noise monitoring. We own several noise monitors and related equipment and have the staff available to STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5 / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com mobilize and monitor noise on short notice. The Noise Control Plans incorporate the most practical and effective measures to mitigate noise and vibration impacts from the construction activities. Our Plans includes the following elements: • Noise monitoring with state-of-the-art equipment • Reporting and availability of monitoring data • Mapping of sensitive receptors and noise monitoring meter locations • Action levels to evaluate noise from construction operations • Complaint resolution processes Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Studies Meridian Consultants’ air quality and climate change professionals are a specialized team with an up-to-date and in- depth understanding of the complex and evolving regulatory landscape. The services offered include air quality impact assessments for CEQA and NEPA documents, health risk assessments (HRAs), greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories, and stationary source permitting and emission inventories. Our services include: • Feasibility studies • Air quality impact assessments (CEQA/NEPA) • Health risk assessments (HRAs) • Agency negotiation and litigation support • Construction equipment loading and emissions monitoring • Stationary source permitting and emission inventories • Construction dust monitoring In conducting construction air quality mitigation, the following components are included: • Assign in-house SCAQMD-certified dust control supervisors • Use meteorological data to assist in selecting the sampler locations • Monitor work area dust using hand-held dust monitors • Ensure applicable Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) • Obtain Tier certifications for construction equipment as needed • Ensure that air quality monitors provide written records of all dust control measures well as fugitive dust observations and data • Complete all required SCAQMD forms STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5 / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Water Rights Permitting and Water Banking & Transfers Meridian is a leader in completing water rights permitting and the associate environmental review. As the lead environmental consultant for the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Water Rights Division, we are responsible for assisting the Division with the environmental review of water rights permit applications throughout California. Our senior staff has experience in water banking and water purchases and transfers. Through a variety of projects, we have worked with water agencies and water banks to address the short and long-term environmental issues associated with these projects. Through our involvement, we have become experienced in the intricacies associated with habitat issues, movement, and storage of water through a variety of methods, water quality and mixing issues, and water rights implications. Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification Meridian is recognized statewide as a leading preparer of water supply assessments (WSAs) required under California Water Code Sections 10910 and of water supply verifications (WSVs) required under Government Code Section 66473.7. Meridian has provided water reliability planning for projects in communities across the state, and is regularly sought out to prepare WSAs in areas where water supply is a complex and controversial issue. We provide water reliability planning consulting services as a stand-alone service or as part of a comprehensive package of services that also includes CEQA compliance and other related support. Mitigation Implementation Completing CEQA/NEPA compliance and obtaining regulatory permits enables project initiation, but successful project completion requires that mitigation and permit terms be implemented in a manner that meets regulatory requirements while allowing construction to move ahead smoothly. With that in mind, we can provide a full range of mitigation implementation and monitoring services, including “tailgate” training sessions for construction personnel. Our experienced personnel interface effectively with construction, agency, and local jurisdiction staff, providing efficient and economical mitigation implementation. Public Outreach and Facilitation We provide stakeholder outreach in support of land use and water planning, infrastructure development, and environmental compliance processes, ranging from individual milestone meetings with specifically designated goals to formulating and implementing comprehensive outreach programs. CEQA and NEPA establish minimum requirements for public dialogue, and for some projects additional outreach can be essential to project success, offering a powerful tool to build trust at project initiation, and providing the opportunity to resolve issues if opposition is identified during the process. For each project, Meridian staff works closely with our clients to develop and implement a carefully coordinated program of services designed to achieve the specific objectives of the project. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Meridian Consultants LLC / 910 Hampshire Road, Suite V / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Leadership The leaders of Meridian Consultants are: Tony Locacciato, AICP Group Leader, Planning and Environmental Compliance Practice Joe Gibson Group Leader, Water and Natural Resources Practice Christ Kirikian Group Leader, Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Noise Assessment Practice The partners of Meridian Consulting have worked together for more than 15 years and have complementary skill sets and experience. Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner Mr. Locacciato is an urban and regional planner with 40 years of diverse experience in planning and environmental analysis. His background in consulting, public sector planning, and private development results in an understanding of the relationships between land use regulations, environmental impacts, and the implementation of projects. Mr. Locacciato has experience in land use planning; land use studies; the preparation of Specific Plans, Master Environmental Assessments, Program and Project Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Supplemental EIRs and Addendums to EIRs, Initial Studies, and Mitigated Negative Declarations; and site feasibility and constraints analysis. He also has provided a wide range of environmental consulting services, including preparation of EIRs, review of EIRs, and direction of mitigation monitoring programs, to numerous public agencies. He has been involved in the planning and environmental review of commercial, industrial, residential, and mixed- use projects in both urban and rural settings for communities throughout California, as well as for a wide variety of public infrastructure and public facility projects. His specialty is the management of complex multidisciplinary projects and project teams. As a Partner of Meridian Consultants, Mr. Locacciato provides oversight and direction of projects and directly manages projects. The Meridian Team STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Meridian Consultants LLC / 910 Hampshire Road, Suite V / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Joe Gibson Partner Mr. Gibson has 35 years of experience managing and conducting environmental studies. He has participated in a variety of projects involving the California Environmental Protection Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for federal, state, and local government and private-sector clients. Mr. Gibson leads the water and natural resource practice group and has previously served as principal-in-charge for the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) CEQA Efficiency Pilot Project as well as for numerous other water infrastructure and water right application projects. As such, he is experienced in maneuvering projects through the SWRCB application and hearing process, and is considered an expert in the application of CEQA to water resource and permitting projects. Among his specialties are the preparation of water supply assessments/verifications, hydrologic analysis of surface water improvements, and studies requiring analysis of surface hydrology and water quality management. Mr. Gibson has completed numerous CEQA documents for large-scale development projects in Southern California. He has also recently served as CEQA Program Director for the Los Angeles Unified School District when he oversaw the preparation of dozens of EIRs for the District’s new school construction program. In addition, he oversaw the development of guidelines for a variety of special studies required for school facilities, including rail safety, pipeline safety, and other issues. Recently, he has managed the preparation of studies for water resource projects for local and state agencies. Mr. Gibson has experience serving on both elected and appointed boards that have land use responsibilities, including serving as a Planning Commissioner for the City of Thousand Oaks and as a longtime elected Board Member of the Conejo Recreation & Park District. He also serves as Board Member of the California Association of Recreation and Park Districts. Mr. Gibson is currently serving as a member of the Technical Advisory Committee for the California Natural Resources Agency’s (CRNA) Climate Change Adaption Policy Guide (APG). The CNRA, created by an executive order of the Governor, is coordinating with ten different state agencies, scientists, a consulting team, and public stakeholders to develop the first statewide multisector adaptation strategy in the country. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Meridian Consultants LLC / 910 Hampshire Road, Suite V / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Christ Kirikian Principal Mr. Kirikian is the Director of Air Quality & Acoustics with Meridian Consultants. As a Principal with Meridian Consultants, Mr. Kirikian’s role includes participating at the top level of the organization and reporting to the Board of Managers regarding environmental and planning projects and market initiatives. In addition, Mr. Kirikian’s role as the Director of Air Quality & Acoustics includes securing and overseeing implementation of a variety of air quality and acoustics (noise) projects. Mr. Kirikian’s experience related to Air Quality and Climate Change includes preparing air pollutant emissions inventories, dispersion modeling, and health risk assessments (HRAs) for residential, commercial, and transportation projects utilizing the CalEEMod and AERMOD models. Mr. Kirikian’s experience related to Noise includes assessment of a variety of mobile (aviation and vehicle) and stationary noise sources associated with urban development and infrastructure projects, with specific expertise in utilizing SoundPLAN, Aviation Environmental Design Tool, and FHWA TNM models. Additional roles include serving as an environmental monitoring manager for large-scale compliance monitoring efforts during construction and operation ensuring compliance of all disciplines including air quality, biology permitting, noise monitoring, stormwater management, geotechnical oversight of excavations, cultural resources monitoring and other associated activities. Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner Practice Group Leader, Environmental Compliance and Planning 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 About Mr. Locacciato is an urban and regional planner with 40 years of diverse experience in planning and environmental analysis. His background in consulting, public sector planning, and private development results in an understanding of the relationships between land use regulations, environmental impacts, and the implementation of projects. Mr. Locacciato has experience in land use planning; land use studies; the preparation of Specific Plans, Master Plans, Environmental Assessments (EAs), Program and Project Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Supplemental EIRs and Addendums to EIRs, Initial Studies, and Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs); and site feasibility and constraints analysis. He also has provided a wide range of environmental consulting services to cities, including the preparation of EIRs, the review of EIRs, and the direction of mitigation monitoring programs. Mr. Locacciato has been involved in the planning and environmental review of commercial, industrial, residential, and mixed-use projects in urban and rural settings for communities throughout California as well as for a wide variety of public infrastructure and public facility projects. His specialty is the management of complex multidisciplinary projects. Mr. Locacciato provides oversight and direction of projects and directly manages complex projects. Education Bachelor of Science, City and Regional Planning California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals Urban Land Institute Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 Relevant Project Experience Project Manager for the Music Festivals Plan EIR in the city of Indio. The project proposed an amendment to the City of Indio Municipal Code to adopt an ordinance pertaining to Major Music Festival Event Permits; a Major Music Festival Event Permit; and a Development Agreement. The Major Music Festival Event Permit would allow an increase in attendance for the Coachella and Stagecoach Music Festivals and for two events in the fall through 2030. The EIR analysis focused on the potential environmental impacts to local and regional air quality and greenhouse gases, biological resources, land use compatibility with the surrounding residential neighborhoods, noise associated with the festival events, public services, and traffic on the surrounding communities. Project manager for the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan EIR for the City of La Quinta. This EIR evaluated a Specific Plan proposed for an automobile dealership mall on one- half of this site at Washington Street and Highway 111, and for a major retail commercial center on the other half of the site. Mr. Locacciato was also retained by the City to prepare a Supplemental EIR for this project that addressed a proposed amendment to the Specific Plan to allow for greater flexibility in the mix of auto-related and general commercial uses on the site. To garner support for the approval of the retail center component of the project, Mr. Locacciato completed an Addendum to the previous EIRs that focused on the potential impacts of having a new Super Walmart anchoring this center. Project director for the preparation of the Glendale Town Center EIR for the Glendale Redevelopment Agency in Glendale. This EIR provided a comprehensive analysis of a mixed-use commercial and residential project on a key 16- acre site in the center of downtown Glendale. The Glendale Town Center includes 475,000 square feet of retail and entertainment uses, with 338 residential units in the upper floors of the buildings. A major objective of this project was to connect major facilities and development in the downtown area, including the adjacent Glendale Galleria Mall, the existing retail development along Brand Boulevard, and the City’s Central Library by creating pedestrian connections through the site and the new public park, which would serve as the centerpiece of the Project. A full project EIR was prepared, and Mr. Locacciato managed all phases of the environmental review process for the redevelopment agency. A lawsuit was filed on the adequacy of the EIR, which was found to be adequate by the Los Angeles Superior Court; and this decision was upheld on appeal. Project manager for the Burbank Media Center EIR for the City of Burbank. Over a period of 4 years, Mr. Locacciato prepared two project EIRs for a mixed-use project proposed on a 4-acre site at a key location in the Burbank Media District. As originally proposed, the Burbank Media Center consisted of 925,000 square feet of development, including office uses; a business- and visitor-serving hotel; a health club; a childcare facility; retail space; and a church in 3-, 6-, and 18-story buildings. The first EIR included an analysis of several alternative configurations of uses and buildings on the site. After the original project was not approved, Mr. Locacciato prepared a second EIR for the City, evaluating four additional development scenarios at an equal level of detail to assist the City in determining the appropriate intensity of development for this site. After completion of the second EIR, the City approved a residential and retail commercial project. Project manager for the Warner Bros. Studio Master Plan Expansion EIR for the City of Burbank. Mr. Locacciato organized and conducted public scoping meetings and prepared an Expanded Initial Study to determine the scope of this EIR, which addressed master plans for two separate studio sites in the City of Burbank. The project involved plans to add more than 4 million square feet of new studio facilities over a 20-year period. Traffic, aesthetics, historical resources, and neighborhood compatibility were major issues of concern. Mr. Locacciato also prepared an addendum to this EIR for the City that provided a detailed analysis of a multilevel parking garage located next to an existing residential neighborhood. Project manager for the Wilshire Vermont Joint-Use project Addendum to the EIR for the Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency and the Metropolitan Transportation Agency in Wilshire. Mr. Locacciato prepared a comprehensive addendum to the Wilshire Center and Koreatown Redevelopment Project EIR evaluating a mixed-use residential and retail commercial project proposed on the site above the Metro Red Line’s Wilshire/Vermont Station. The project included 444 Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 residential apartments planned in six levels above a ground level containing approximately 30,600 square feet of retail commercial space. Parking was provided in a 3- story subterranean parking structure containing 732 parking spaces. Reconfiguration of the portal to the Red Line Station was also a part of the project. Project manager for the Wilshire Boulevard Temple Master Plan EIR for the City of Los Angeles. This master plan addressed the renovation of the Wilshire Boulevard Temple, designated as a City of Los Angeles Historic- Cultural Monument and listed in the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historic Resources, and the addition of a new school and other facilities to this key block on Wilshire Boulevard to accommodate its evolving spiritual, educational, community, and administrative programs. The main topic addressed in the EIR was the compatibility of new buildings with the existing historic building on the site. Project manager for the University Gateway EIR for the Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency. This 8-story, 630,000-square-foot residential and commercial building at the northwest corner of the intersection of Figueroa Street and Jefferson Boulevard provided 421 new student apartments designed to accommodate up to 1,656 University of Southern California (USC) students, with retail commercial uses on the ground floor. The project is located within the Exposition/University Park Redevelopment Project Area and is also part of the Figueroa Corridor. Key issues associated with this project and preparation of the environmental analysis included the provision of adequate on- and off-site parking, consistency with the Exposition/University Park Redevelopment Plan and the South Los Angeles Community Plan; impacts on the adjacent historic Shrine Auditorium; aesthetic impacts; and traffic and parking impacts on the surrounding community. Project director for the City Center II project in the City of Glendale. This mixed-use residential and hotel high-rise development project includes a 20-story residential tower and an 18-story hotel/residential mixed-use tower. In addition, a retail/café component is to be provided on the ground floor of the east tower and would open up to the existing City Center I Plaza. A full project EIR was prepared based on direction from the Glendale Redevelopment Agency. Issues addressed in the EIR included land use and planning, population and housing, aesthetics, geologic and seismic hazards, hydrology and water quality, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, archeological and historic resources, hazards and hazardous materials, public services, utilities and services systems, and recreation. Project manager for the Figueroa and Adams Student Housing project EIR for the City of Los Angeles. This project involved the development of a residential building containing 137 student housing units and replacement parking for an adjacent church on Figueroa Street near the University of Southern California (USC). Key issues addressed in the EIR included historic resources and aesthetics because of the presence of adjacent historic properties; archaeological resources due to the potential for impacts to a portion of a late 1800s water delivery system, and to encounter buried remains of a circa 1888 residential complex; traffic and circulation; and the effects of construction on air quality and noise. Project Manager for the Glendale Triangle project EIR for the City of Glendale. The project is a mixed‐use development containing 218 dwelling units and 54,000 square feet of commercial space with 3½ levels of subterranean parking. Key issues being addressed in the EIR are construction aesthetics, noise, and parking. Project director for the California State University, Northridge (CSUN) Master Plan EIR. The Master Plan for the 353-acre San Fernando Valley campus was proposed to enable the University to accommodate the growing enrollment and broadening range of programs offered on the campus. The Master Plan addresses the expansion of academic and administrative facilities; the enhancement of campus open space; the expansion of student housing and dining facilities; the development of faculty and staff housing; improved vehicle and pedestrian access and circulation; new parking facilities; and upgrades of campus utilities. The EIR evaluated the overall Master Plan as well as a number of the individual new buildings and facilities included in the Master Plan. Major issues included traffic and circulation, parking, housing, and a range of aesthetic issues, including balancing increased campus development with retention of open space and the creation of an attractive, distinct campus identity along the community interface. Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 Project director for the Brentwood School Education Master Plan EIR. The Brentwood School, a private K–12 coed day school, currently operates on two separate campuses located east and west of Sunset Boulevard in the community of Brentwood, within the City of Los Angeles. The Master Plan provides for adding approximately 240,000 square feet of new facilities to both campuses and guiding land use and development at the school for the next 25 years. The majority of the new facilities would be added to the East Campus, which houses the middle and high school; the smaller portion of new facilities would be added to the West Campus, which is home to the elementary school. Key issues relate to the compatibility of the new facilities with the surrounding residential neighborhoods, including visual, traffic, and circulation impacts. Impacts during construction are also being thoroughly assessed to address neighborhood concerns. Project manager for the 500-acre East Area 1 Specific Plan EIR for the City of Santa Paula. Over a span of 6 years, Mr. Locacciato prepared and managed the preparation of the full range of technical, environmental, and economic studies to guide the preparation of a Specific Plan and EIR for this project and supported the review and approval of a Sphere of Influence amendment and annexation of this area by the County of Ventura Local Agency Formation Commission in March 2011. Project manager for the Runkle Canyon Specific Plan EIR for the City of Simi Valley. This specific plan was prepared to allow for the development of a master-planned residential community on 1,595 acres, containing a mix of residential densities, natural open space, a neighborhood park, a multiuse trail system, and an area for a potential future public golf course. The specific plan allows 460 homes on approximately 150 acres in the northern portion of the specific plan area. Approximately 1,454 acres will remain in open space and recreational uses, including a 10-acre neighborhood park, 1,150 acres of natural open space, and approximately 220 acres designated for the potential future development of a public golf course. In addition to supporting the adoption of the Specific Plan by the City of Simi Valley, this EIR served as the environmental clearance document for approval of annexation of this site by the Ventura Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). Project director for the Azusa Pacific University Master Plan EIR for the City of Azusa. This long-range Master Plan provided for the addition of new educational facilities on the east and west campuses located in Azusa. The objectives of the Master Plan included balancing the uses on both campuses by providing additional student housing and parking on both campuses in addition to new classroom buildings. Key issues included the compatibility of the proposed increase in intensity of uses on the campus with existing surrounding neighborhoods and the proposed redevelopment of the Azusa Drive-In Theater, which is designated as a historic resource and eligible for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources as the last drive-in theater on historic Route 66 in the state. Project manager for the Sun City Shadow Hills Master Plan EIR for the City of Indio. This full-scope EIR, prepared over a 7-month period for the City, evaluated the first major development project proposed in Indio’s Gateway Conceptual Specific Plan Area in north Indio. The Shadow Hills project consisted of a proposal to develop a private, age-restricted residential community on approximately 800 acres with 2,500 single-family homes, a golf course, and 65 acres of commercial uses. Key issues included compatibility with the Bermuda Dunes Airport, changes to the General Plan Circulation Plan for north Indio, and the preparation of one of the first SB 610 Water Supply Assessments (WSA) for a major project served by the Coachella Valley Water District. Project manager for the Sun City Shadow Hills Expansion for the City of Indio. This Supplemental EIR evaluated the addition of 305 acres to the Sun City Shadow Hills community to allow for the development of a third phase. This full-scope EIR evaluated the proposed development of an additional 1,200 homes and an 18-hole golf course on the expansion area. Project manager for the Travertine Point Specific Plan EIR for the County of Riverside. The County of Riverside certified this EIR and adopted the Specific Plan for this new 5,000-acre master planned community in December 2011. Travertine Point is a new town planned on the northwest shore of the Salton Sea. The majority of this Specific Plan area is located in Riverside County with a portion located in Imperial County. Portions of the project site also include Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indian tribal lands. This comprehensive EIR addresses a Specific Plan permitting Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 the development of over 16,655 new homes and 5 million square feet of commercial and light industrial development. This full scope EIR includes extensive analysis of traffic impacts, greenhouse gas and other air quality impacts, cultural resource and other impacts, as well as a Water Supply Assessment. Project director for the 2011 City of Coachella General Plan Update EIR. Mr. Locacciato assisted the City of Coachella and its General Plan consultant with the General Plan update program by preparing a Program EIR on the 2011 General Plan. Project manager for the La Quinta Resort Master Plan EIR for the City of La Quinta. This EIR addressed a proposed amendment to the Specific Plan for the La Quinta Resort to allow for an expansion of the resort. New facilities were proposed to add 800 new hotel and timeshare units to the existing resort. Proposed buildings in the resort core included a new four-story hotel/conference center building. Key issues assessed in this EIR included aesthetic impacts, traffic impacts, and potential historic resource impacts from the proposed intensification of resort facilities. Project manager for the Shadow View Specific Plan EIR for the City of Coachella. This EIR evaluated a residential and retail commercial project proposed on an important 455- acre site located at the entry of the City’s Commercial Entertainment Zone. A full-scope EIR addressed all potential impacts of the proposed gated residential golf course community and major retail center. Major topics of interest included the consistency of the proposed uses with the City’s General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements. After a new plan was developed for the project, the entire EIR was revised and recirculated for additional public review. Mr. Locacciato also prepared the Specific Plan document for the City. Project manager for the Desert Lakes Specific Plan for the City of Coachella. Mr. Locacciato prepared a full-scope EIR for this Specific Plan for approximately 2,500 acres located north of the I-10 Freeway. As proposed, the Desert Lakes community was to include 7,300 new homes in three separate residential villages surrounding a town center containing up to 300,000 square feet of retail/commercial, office, and high-density residential uses. Services provided include full management of the environmental review process, including conducting scoping and agency consultation meetings, and directing the preparation of all technical studies, including traffic, cultural resources, and geology studies. In addition, Mr. Locacciato coordinated the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment and consultation with Native American tribal representatives on traditional tribal cultural places as required by SB 18. Project manager for the Country Club of the Desert Specific Plan EIR for the City of La Quinta. Mr. Locacciato prepared a comprehensive EIR for the City of La Quinta for this Specific Plan addressing a 990-acre site located immediately north of the PGA West Community in La Quinta. This Specific Plan allows for the development of approximately 525 acres of the 988-acre site as a private golf course country club with three 18-hole golf courses and related clubhouse facilities. Development of approximately 402 acres with a variety of single-family homes, including custom homes, detached production homes, detached villas, and attached casitas, is also allowed by this Specific Plan. After the initial approval of this project, the City retained Mr. Locacciato to prepare a comprehensive Addendum to the original EIR to add 120 acres to the Specific Plan area and to revise the permitted land uses to allow for the development of the site with the Madison Club and Hideaway development projects. Project manager for The Ranch Specific Plan EIR, SilverRock Resort Specific Plan, MND, and an Addendum to this MND for the City of La Quinta. Mr. Locacciato served as the City of La Quinta’s environmental planning consultant on this important 700-acre site located north of the PGA West Community over several years. A comprehensive EIR was prepared by Mr. Locacciato for a new resort proposed for this site. Following preparation of this EIR, Mr. Locacciato prepared an MND for acquisition of this site by the City’s Redevelopment Agency. Mr. Locacciato then supported the City’s planning and development efforts for this site by preparing a Specific Plan for the golf course and resort hotel project and an Addendum to MND evaluating this proposed Specific Plan. Project manager for The Pointe Specific Plan EIR for the City of La Quinta. Mr. Locacciato prepared an EIR for this Specific Plan to guide the development of a residential retirement community on a 43-acre site located adjacent Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 to the Santa Rosa Mountains and south of Highway 111 and west of Washington Street. A comprehensive EIR was prepared focusing on potential biological resource, aesthetic, and traffic impacts. Project director for the Supplemental EIR for Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 281 (Sun City Palm Desert) for the County of Riverside. This EIR evaluated a major amendment to this Specific Plan to realign major roadways, other infrastructure, and planning area boundaries in the northern half of this 1,575-acre Specific Plan area. A comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of this amendment was provided in this EIR. Managed the preparation of an Addendum to the EIR to for County of Riverside Specific Plan EIR for the Sun City Palm Desert project to evaluate the impacts of an amendment to the Specific Plan for the County of Riverside. In addition, Mr. Locacciato managed the preparation of an EA and EIR Addendum for the City of Palm Desert evaluating the impacts of a set of preannexation actions on the Sun City Palm Desert project, including a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and approval of a Development Agreement. Project manager for the Desert Dunes Specific Plan EIR for the County of Riverside. This comprehensive EIR evaluated the adoption of a Specific Plan by the County of Riverside to allow 2,250 homes to be developed on 475 acres located around the existing Desert Dunes golf Course located 2 miles north of the I-10 Freeway and 1 mile south of the City of Desert Hot Springs in the Coachella Valley. Project director for the Eden Rock Subsequent EIR for the City of La Quinta. Mr. Locacciato prepared this Subsequent EIR, evaluating a residential development project proposed for the undeveloped land portion of the PGA West Community. A General Plan Amendment and Zone Change were proposed to allow 97 multifamily residential condominiums to be developed on 42 acres in the center of the PGA West Golf Course Community. This Subsequent EIR updated the information and analysis in the Final EIR for the PGA West project to evaluate this proposed project. Project manager for the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR for the City of Oxnard. This EIR evaluated the impacts of the largest mixed-use project ever approved in Ventura County. The 700-acre RiverPark project includes 2,800 residential units and 2.8 million square feet of commercial development. The land plan reflects new urbanism planning principles and incorporates a mixed-use town center. The project involves the annexation and reclamation of an existing sand and gravel mine site located next to the Santa Clara River, a sensitive area for biological resources. Mr. Locacciato directed the preparation of a full range of detailed technical studies and prepared a detailed full-scope EIR addressing all topics. Mr. Locacciato also reviewed and directed the preparation of the Specific Plan by the applicant. Project manager for the Northwest Golf Course Community Specific Plan and EIR for the City of Oxnard. Managed a multidisciplinary team to prepare a specific plan for the addition of 18 holes to an existing golf course and the creation of a compatible community of 450 homes. The golf course extension was planned on a closed landfill and an amendment of the approved closure plan was required as well as an adjustment of the sphere of influence for the City and annexation of the property. Project manager for the North Shore at Mandalay Bay EIR for the City of Oxnard. Managed the preparation of a series of technical studies to determine the feasibility of redeveloping a closed oil field waste site for residential uses. A comprehensive consultation process with responsible agencies was conducted to determine the scope of the EIR for the project. The EIR evaluated a proposal for 450 waterfront homes on this 80-acre site in the coastal zone. Project manager for the Central LA Middle School No. 3 project for the Los Angeles Unified School District in Los Angeles. This EIR evaluated a new 789 two-semester seat middle school in a new 30-classroom building on a 2.5- acre site above the Metro Red Line Wilshire/Vermont Station. Project manager for the Chaffey Community Master Plan for the Chaffey Community College District in Rancho Cucamonga. This EIR looked at the Master Plan for expansion of the main campus on Haven Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Major issues included the impacts of changes in the access and circulation system Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 for the campus and traffic impacts on the streets surrounding the campus. Project manager for the Canyon Oaks Supplemental EIR for the County of Los Angeles. This comprehensive Supplemental EIR evaluated a revised project proposed for a sensitive 100-acre site in the Santa Monica Mountains. Previous proposals for this site had been under review for over 12 years. Visual impacts, land use compatibility, effect on community character, biology, grading, geologic stability, and water quality were issues of concern. Project director for the Mountaingate South EIR for the City of Los Angeles. Mountaingate South is located in a steep canyon area of the Santa Monica Mountains. The project area totaled 281 acres with development on 61 acres with 29 dwelling units. The remaining portions of the project area are dedicated as permanent open space. A full-scope EIR was prepared for this project with key issues including plant and animal habitats, fire management, and viewsheds. Project director for the Sierra Madre Master Environmental Assessment (MEA) and General Plan EIR in Sierra Madre. The MEA was compiled to provide information to the City’s General Plan Advisory Committee for use during the process of updating the General Plan. The EIR was prepared after the draft update of the General Plan was completed based on the information in the MEA. Project manager for the Commercial Development Standards EIR for the City of Santa Monica. This EIR provided a comparative evaluation of 12 different sets of alternative development standards being considered by the City for all commercial and industrial zones in the City. Project manager for preparation of the Sun City Tehama Specific Plan EIR for the County of Tehama. This project proposed the development of a master-planned, mixed- use community including residential, commercial, and institutional uses. The proposed Specific Plan would allow for the development of a total of approximately 4,200 residential units, with the majority (approximately 3,700 units) comprised by an age-restricted retirement community. Approximately 500,000 square feet of commercial uses were also initially proposed. Mr. Locacciato prepared and circulated a comprehensive full- scope EIR for Tehama County and also prepared a revised EIR for recirculation after the project was modified in response to comments on the original Draft EIR. Major issues include the provision of public services to this planned new community and the impact of the project on the adjacent I-5 Freeway. Project director for the Rancho La Sierra Specific Plan in Riverside. Directed the preparation of the Specific Plan document, which incorporated a land plan designed through a public planning process. Project manager for the City of Santa Monica Master Environmental Assessment (MEA) in Santa Monica. This MEA was prepared during a moratorium on commercial and industrial development in the City in order to provide a comprehensive source of information on environmental conditions throughout the City. This MEA also included an analysis of the potential cumulative effects of development based on a master list of projects for the entire City. This MEA was prepared based on available published information and is updated on an annual basis. Project manager for the College Park project environmental database for the City of Palmdale. This database was compiled for a 640-acre site in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains to guide the preparation of a Specific Plan for this site and to provide information for the Specific Plan EIR. Planned uses included a community college campus and residential uses. The site was located in a sensitive foothill area adjacent to the San Andreas Fault. Mr. Locacciato also managed the preparation of a Supplemental EIR on this project, which evaluated a set of comprehensive revisions to the Specific Plan. Project manager for the Arroyo Linda Crossroads Specific Plan EIR for the City of Arroyo Grande. This EIR evaluated the impacts of the development of mixed commercial, light industrial, and residential uses on a 290-acre site in San Luis Obispo County. The project involved annexing 185 acres to the City of Arroyo Grande. Project director for the Antelope Valley Enterprise Zone EIR for the Cities of Palmdale and Lancaster and the County of Los Angeles. This program EIR evaluated the potential impacts of designating a 28,000-acre area under the jurisdiction of the cities of Lancaster and Palmdale and Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 the County of Los Angeles as an Enterprise Zone. The EIR was prepared within a short time frame based on existing planning and environmental documents previously prepared by the three jurisdictions. Project director for the City of Lancaster Master Environmental Assessment (MEA) and General Plan EIR. The MEA provided a statement of existing conditions for the city to be used to streamline environmental documentation of future projects. The MEA is formatted for the City to update on an as-needed basis. The General Plan EIR analyzes three potential development scenarios, including an expanded sphere of influence area extending to the San Bernardino County line. Project director for a Program EIR for the City of South Pasadena General Plan Update. The project involved the update of the City of South Pasadena General Plan with the exception of the Housing Element. Project manager for the Douglas Ranch Specific Plan project for the City of Simi Valley. The Specific Plan provides for the development of several residential areas and a cemetery on a hillside site. Project director for the West Main Street Corridor Redevelopment Master Plan EIR in Alhambra. The project involved a Master Plan for the redevelopment of a five- block portion of West Main Street in downtown Alhambra, as well as the redevelopment of four sites in downtown Alhambra totaling approximately 13.96 acres, and would result in the creation of nearly 70,000 square feet of commercial uses, 725 residential units, including for-sale condominiums and rental apartments, and offices. Proposed redevelopment is intended to complement the previous redevelopment of West Main Street in the adjacent Civic Center district of Alhambra. Key project elements include the creation of comprehensive design standards for use throughout the West Main Street redevelopment area, the creation of public open space, a provision of affordable housing, and the relocation of the public library. Major issues to be addressed included aesthetics; traffic and circulation; population and housing, including relocation of existing businesses and residents; and historic architectural resources. Prepared an EIR for the City of Simi Valley that evaluated a major amendment to the City’s adopted Whiteface Specific Plan for the Lost Canyons Specific Plan, which guides development in 1,770 acres of hillside and canyon areas in the northern portion of the City. The Lost Canyons Golf Club currently consists of two 18-hole golf courses in this existing Specific Plan area. The Lost Canyons Specific Plan would allow for the redevelopment of one of these golf courses into a new residential community containing 365 homes. This comprehensive EIR includes an analysis of potential impacts with regard to aesthetics, air quality, biology, cultural resources, geology, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology, land use, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, traffic, and utilities. Project manager for the EIR for the Downtown Specific Plan for the Uptown and Town Center areas of the City of Paso Robles. The goals of the Specific Plan included continuing revitalization of the City’s historic downtown district while encouraging appropriate infill development. The EIR evaluated the growth projected to occur under the new Form-Based Code included in the Specific Plan. Key issues evaluated in the EIR identify environmental impacts within five key walkability sheds, which represent the extent of the distance a typical pedestrian will walk (approximately 5 minutes or one-quarter of a mile). Environmental issues evaluated in the EIR will include impacts to the Salinas River Corridor from Specific Plan implementation, transportation and traffic impacts, infrastructure improvements, land use and planning, cultural and historic resources, and public services. Project director for the Verdugo Gardens EIR in the City of Glendale that evaluated a proposed 24-story residential condominium building, including 287 housing units; 3,600 square feet of ground-floor retail-commercial uses; a public open space plaza and park; landscaping; lighting; utilities; subterranean and above-grade parking, which would be screened from public streets with perimeter housing; and associated amenities. A full project EIR was prepared based on direction from the Glendale Redevelopment Agency. Issues addressed in the EIR included land use and planning, population and housing, aesthetics, geologic and seismic hazards, hydrology and water quality, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, archeological and historic resources, hazards and Tony Locacciato, AICP Partner 92 0 Hampshire Road, Suite A5 Westlake Village, California 91361 805.367.5720 hazardous materials, public services; recreation; and utilities and service systems. Project director for the Walmart Food Distribution Center EIR for the City of Barstow. This EIR evaluated the proposed West Barstow Specific Plan No. 4, which authorizes the construction and operation of a 1-million- square-foot regional food distribution center on approximately 145-acres of land in Barstow. Topics evaluated in this EIR included aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, and utilities and service systems. Project manager for the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan EIR for the City of Thousand Oaks. This proposed Specific Plan addressed more than 275 acres within the core of the City of Thousand Oaks along 3.5 miles of Thousand Oaks Boulevard. This Specific Plan regulates the mix of land uses, heights, setbacks, and parking requirements allowed within the Specific Plan Area and contains new development standards allowing mixed-use projects, increased height and density, and master planned streetscape and landscape standards to improve the visual and pedestrian character of the Boulevard. The EIR evaluated the potential impacts of up to 1.1 million square feet of commercial development and 370 housing units within the Specific Plan area. Project manager for the NBC Studios Master Plan EIR for the City of Burbank. The Master Plan was designed to meet the changing needs of NBC and the media sector. The master plan included six new studios, each consisting of approximately 23,000 square feet and four 15-story office buildings, and each containing approximately 475,000 square feet of space. Required parking was provided through the construction of multilevel parking structures, which included more than 7,000 spaces. Development of these facilities was phased to meet the business needs of NBC. This EIR was prepared and certified within 7 months. Sunrise Company  300 Eagle Dance Circle  Palm Desert, California 92211 File No. 300300‐005  Doc. No. 18‐08‐702  Report of Phase I  Environmental Site Assessment  377.206 Acres West of Madison Street  W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60  La Quinta, Riverside County, California            August 3, 2018          Submitted By:  Earth Systems Pacific  79811B Country Club Drive  Bermuda Dunes, California 92203              ©2018 Earth Systems Pacific  Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited   without the express written consent of Earth Systems Pacific.      August 3, 2018 File No. 300300‐005   Doc. No. 18‐08‐702  Sunrise Company  300 Eagle Dance Circle  Palm Desert, California 92211    Attention: Mr. Phillip K. Smith    Subject: Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment     Project: 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street  W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60  La Quinta, Riverside County, California    Earth Systems Pacific [Earth Systems] has completed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment  [ESA] of the site referenced above.  This report was prepared for your exclusive use.  It was  prepared to stand as a whole and no part should be excerpted or used in exclusion of any other  part.  This project was conducted in accordance with our proposal dated July 6, 2018 and  authorized on July 12, 2018.  Thank you for this opportunity to be of service.  If you have any  questions regarding this report, or the information contained herein, please contact this office at  your convenience.      I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of  Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR 312.10.  I have the specific qualifications based  on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of  the subject site.  I have endeavored to perform this project in conformance with the standards  and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312.      Respectfully submitted,  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC        Alexander Schriener, Jr., PG 7198   Associate Geologist     ESA/asj/klm/cgj    Distribution: 6/Sunrise Company   1/BD File     EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Report of Phase I  Environmental Site Assessment  377.206 Acres West of Madison Street  W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60  La Quinta, Riverside County, California     August 3, 2018    TABLE OF CONTENTS  1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1  1.1 Project Information ................................................................................................. 1  1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work ................................................................................... 1  1.3 Definitions ............................................................................................................... 2  1.4 Qualifications .......................................................................................................... 3  1.5 Exclusions and Data Gaps ....................................................................................... 3  1.6 Limitations and Reliance ......................................................................................... 4  2.0 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 5  2.1 Size, Location, and Name ........................................................................................ 5  2.2 Assessor’s Parcel Number(s) ................................................................................... 5  2.3 Township, Range, Section ....................................................................................... 5  2.4 Site Boundaries ....................................................................................................... 5  2.5 Current Development and Access .......................................................................... 6  2.6 Zoning/Land Use Records ....................................................................................... 6  2.7 Site Topography ...................................................................................................... 6  2.8 Surface Water Bodies ............................................................................................. 6  2.9 Geology and Hydrogeology ..................................................................................... 6  3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ................................................................................................ 7  3.1 Onsite Observations ................................................................................................ 7  3.2 Site Vicinity Observations ....................................................................................... 8  4.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 8  5.0 RECORDS REVIEW ...................................................................................................... 11  5.1 Agency Database Search Report ........................................................................... 11  5.2 California EPA, State Water Resources Control Board ......................................... 12  5.3 California Department of Toxic Substances Control ............................................. 12  5.4 Tribal Records ....................................................................................................... 12  5.5 Engineering and Institutional Controls ................................................................. 12  5.6 Environmental Cleanup Liens ............................................................................... 12  5.7 CA Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Maps ......... 12  5.8 Riverside County Building Department Records .................................................. 13  6.0 INTERVIEWS, GENERAL RESEARCH, AND PRIOR REPORTS .......................................... 13  6.1 Current Owners/Occupants/Operators ................................................................ 13  6.2 Past Owners/Occupants/Operators ..................................................................... 13  6.3 Owners/Occupants of Neighboring Properties .................................................... 14  6.4 Riverside County Department of Environmental Health ...................................... 14  TABLE OF CONTENTS, continued ii  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  6.5 Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office .......................................... 14  6.6 Common Farm Irrigation Materials ...................................................................... 14  6.7 Other Sources of Information ............................................................................... 15  6.7.1 2006 ESSW ESA ......................................................................................... 15  6.7.2 2006 ESSW Supplemental Pesticide Sampling .......................................... 16  6.7.3 2006 ESSW ESA Update with Supplemental Pesticides Sampling ............ 16  6.8 Prior Experience Regarding Pesticides at Farms ................................................... 16  7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................. 17  8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 19    Appendix A Figures  Appendix B Photographs  Appendix C Agency Database Search Report   Appendix D    Additional Documentation   Appendix E Qualifications Statement   Appendix F Reliance Form                   August 3, 2018 ‐ 1 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  1.0 INTRODUCTION  1.1 Project Information  This report presents the findings of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment [ESA] conducted  by Earth Systems Pacific [Earth Systems] for 377.206 acres located west of Madison Street, south  of Avenue 58, and north of Avenue 60, in La Quinta, Riverside County, California [the site].  This  project was conducted for Sunrise Company in accordance with our proposal dated July 6, 2018  and authorized on July 12, 2018.  We understand that you propose to develop the site for  residential purposes.  This project has been performed at the request of the client for due  diligence purposes.  Earth Systems conducted a 2006 ESA, 2006 Supplemental Pesticide  Sampling, and 2007 ESA Update with Supplemental Pesticides Sampling.  Portions of those prior  reports were used for historical background for this ESA.  We are not aware of special  requirements for this ESA.        1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work  The purpose of an ESA is to evaluate the potential for the presence of soil or groundwater  contamination that may be present because of the past use, handling, storage, or disposal of  hazardous materials or petroleum products on or near the property.  The scope of work for this  evaluation is based on the United States Environmental Protection Agency Final All Appropriate  Inquiry Rule (2006) [US EPA AAI]; and, the ASTM Standard E1527‐13, Standard Practice for  Environmental Site Assessments, and consisted of the tasks listed below.    Site Reconnaissance:  This involved a visual reconnaissance of the site, noting physical  evidence of potential contamination or possible sources of contamination; and observation  of adjacent properties to identify readily observable visual evidence of possible impacts to  the subject site.  Figures depicting the site location and layout are presented in Appendix A.   Significant onsite features were photographed to document current conditions.  Selected site  photographs are presented in Appendix B.      Records Review:  Records regarding the regulatory status and history of the site were  evaluated regarding the possible presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions [REC].   Regulatory agency records were reviewed by obtaining a report listing known sites that  generate, store, use, and/or have released hazardous materials from a firm that specializes  in maintaining a database of this type of information.  A copy of the agency database search  report is presented in Appendix C, and is discussed in Section 5.1.  The search radius for the  agency database search was in accordance with the US EPA AAI and ASTM standard E1527‐ 13 as measured from the approximate property boundary.  Other sources of information are  listed in the references section of this report and may include the following categories of  information (note that each category is utilized at the discretion of Environmental  Professional [EP] until, in the EP’s opinion, sufficient data has been obtained):        Historical aerial photographs    Topographic maps   California Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources maps  August 3, 2018 ‐ 2 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC   Fire insurance maps   Land title information   Local street directories   Zoning/land use records   Engineering and institutional controls, such as deed restrictions and restrictive zoning  to a radius of ¼ mile, if contained in publicly available lists/registries   Tribal records of subject property and adjoining properties (if tribal land)   Local government records such as building department files   Environmental cleanup liens    Prior reports    If the property was not previously developed, sources such as building department files and  street directories were not reviewed.   Relevant supporting documents are provided in  Appendix D.     Interviews:  Persons familiar with the site were interviewed (if possible) regarding the  potential presence of RECs on the site or in a position to affect the site, including the site  owner/operator/occupant, former site owners/operators/occupants (if reasonably  accessible), neighboring property occupants (if the site is abandoned), and selected  government personnel likely to have information regarding environmental conditions at or  near the site.  Information from persons who were successfully contacted is presented in  Section 6.     Report Preparation:  This report was prepared to present our findings, conclusions, and  recommendations.    1.3 Definitions  ASTM E1527‐13 provides definitions for 102 terms and 27 acronyms used in the ESA process.  Earth Systems endeavors to use these terms and acronyms within the meaning provided by ASTM  E1527‐13.  The majority of these terms are either obvious in their meaning or are seldom used in  this report, but a few are significant enough to warrant defining here, as follows:     Site: The term “site” is used in place of the term “property” as defined by ASTM E1527‐13,  and is the physical location that is the subject of the assessment.  The site can include more  than one parcel of land, or only a portion of a parcel of land, depending on the needs of the  client.  ESAs focus primarily on activities that occur within the boundaries of the site, or that  could potentially affect conditions and activities within the boundaries of the site.  RECs on  offsite properties that are not likely to affect the site are not considered to be RECs for the  subject site.    Recognized Environmental Condition [REC]: the presence or likely presence of any hazardous  substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to a release to the  environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under  August 3, 2018 ‐ 3 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.  The term does  not include de minimis conditions.    Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition [CREC]: An REC resulting from a past release  of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction  of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum projects  allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls.     Historical Recognized Environmental Condition [HREC]:  A past release of any hazardous  substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has  been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting  unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the  property to any required controls (such as use restriction).  HRECs are no longer RECs for a  site.    De minimus: A condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the  environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought  to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.       Environmental Professional [EP]: An EP is defined by US EPA AAI as “a person who possesses  sufficient specific education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional  judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or  threatened releases (of hazardous substances) on, at, in, or to a property, sufficient to meet  the objectives and performance factors (of the rule).”  Specific minimum credentials are  required by US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13 to be identified as an EP.       User: The “user” of the report is defined by ASTM Practice E1527‐13 as the party for whom  the assessment is being conducted (the “client”), not the EP.       1.4 Qualifications  Work on this project was performed under the direct supervision of an Environmental  Professional [EP], in accordance with the US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13 requirements.  Mr. Alex  Schriener, Jr. (PG) was the lead EP, the project manager, conducted the site reconnaissance, and  provided senior review.  Ms. Kirsten Murch, Project Geologist, conducted historical aerial  photograph review, other historical review, and agency database review.  A qualifications  statement regarding the personnel who performed this evaluation is presented in Appendix E.    1.5 Exclusions and Data Gaps   The scope of work for this ESA did not include testing the air, groundwater, soil, or building  materials for the presence of hazardous constituents.     August 3, 2018 ‐ 4 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  The US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13 require that gaps in the data used in evaluating the site be  identified.  Data gaps encountered in this project, and their significance to the project, are  summarized below.       As stated in the proposal, land title information would only be reviewed if furnished by  the Client.  Land title information was not provided to Earth Systems, and therefore was  not reviewed.  Because of the availability of other data sources, the lack of title  information is not considered to be significant.     Prior owners, operators, or employees of the site could not be contacted to be  interviewed.  Based on the 2007 Earth Systems Southwest ESA Update this data gap is not  considered significant “since agricultural operations on‐site had ceased by 1990 and these  parties would be unlikely to have information regarding historical agricultural usage of  the site.”       City building department records were requested.  The results of that file review were not  available by the time this report went to publication.  This data gap could be considered  significant if records provided information about farm‐related features onsite.     Historical street directories were not requested.  This data gap is not considered  significant due to the site’s historical usage for agriculture and residences.     Sanborn maps were not available for the site.  This data gap is not considered to be  significant due to the availability of information from other sources.   Recommendations concerning these data gaps are presented in the Recommendations section  of this report.  1.6 Limitations and Reliance  This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Sunrise Company.  Other parties  participating in the transaction for which this project was conducted may also use the  information presented in this report, provided said parties agree that Earth Systems shall have  no additional liability arising from such use than described in the contract under which this  project was conducted.  Any other use of or reliance on the information and opinions contained  in this report without the written authorization of Earth Systems is at the sole risk of the user (to  apply for written authorization to rely on this report, please complete and submit the application  provided in Appendix F).   Note that the conclusions and recommendations rendered in this report are opinions based on  readily available information obtained to date within the scope of the work authorized by the  client, and apply only to site conditions as of the date of the site visit.  The scope of work for this  project was developed to address the needs of the client as part of a property transaction  (purchase, sale, refinance, etc.) and may not meet the needs of other users.    August 3, 2018 ‐ 5 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  It should be noted that any level of assessment cannot ascertain that a property is completely  free of chemical or toxic substances.  We believe the scope of work has been appropriate to allow  the client to make an informed business decision.  According to US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13:  the “shelf life” of an ESA report is six months; an “Update” can be provided to the client within  the first year of the report’s publication (at an additional cost); and if the report is older than one  year, the ESA should be re‐conducted.  Changes in site conditions can render this report obsolete  within a shorter period of time.  Use of this report outside of these time frames or after site  conditions have changed is at the sole risk of the user and without liability and legal exposure to  Earth Systems.      The results contained in this report are based upon the information acquired during the  assessment, including information obtained from third parties. Earth Systems makes no claim as  to the accuracy of the information obtained from others.  In addition, it is possible that variations  exist beyond or between points evaluated during this assessment, and that changes in conditions  can occur in the future due to the works of man, contaminant migration, variations in rainfall or  temperature, a broadening of knowledge, changes in regulatory standards, and/or other factors  not apparent at the time of the field investigation.      The services performed by Earth Systems have been conducted in a manner consistent with the  level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing  under similar conditions in the site vicinity.  No warranty, express or implied, is offered.   2.0 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION  2.1 Size, Location, and Name   The site consists of 377.206 acres of land located west of Madison Avenue, south of Avenue 58,  and north of Avenue 60, in La Quinta, Riverside County, California.  The site is not known by a  particular name, though it has been referred to as Andalusia West in some correspondence we  have received.  The site location is depicted in Figure 1.  The site layout is depicted in Figure 2.     2.2 Assessor’s Parcel Number(s)  The site is identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 764‐200‐076; 764‐210‐007, ‐028, and  ‐029; 766‐070‐003, ‐006, and ‐012; and 766‐080‐001, ‐002, ‐004, and ‐005.  A copy of the report  from the Riverside County Information Technology Geographic Information Services [RCIT]  website is included in Appendix D.   2.3 Township, Range, Section  The site is located across much of Section 28 and across approximately 35 acres of the west  quarter of Section 27, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian.   2.4 Site Boundaries  The property boundaries are defined by Avenue 58 to the north; Madison Street to the west, and  Avenue 60 and a levee along portions of the south.  The west boundary was not demarcated.  For  August 3, 2018 ‐ 6 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  the purposes of this report, the west boundary was estimated based on the RCIT map with aerial  photo, which depicts APN boundaries.     2.5 Current Development and Access  The site is former agricultural and undeveloped land accessed from Avenue 58 to the north and  Madison Street to the east.  Four building sites, one with a dilapidated structure, and a concrete  pad are onsite.  Dirt farm roads cross the site in a grid pattern.  Smaller trails or ATV tracks are  scattered across the north and west portions of the site.    2.6 Zoning/Land Use Records  Zoning/Land Use information was obtained from the City of La Quinta Planning Division website,  which indicated that the property usage is designated as Golf Course – GC, and Residential – RL.  2.7 Site Topography  The surface of the site slopes uniformly to the east at a slight angle.  The elevation of the site  ranges from about sea level in the west to about 45 feet below mean sea level in the east.        2.8 Surface Water Bodies  Surface water bodies are not present on the site, either as lakes or streams.  Rain water appears  to infiltrate within the site.  The nearest surface water body is Lake Cahuilla, ¼ mile west‐ northwest, and hydrogeologically up‐gradient of the site.  Water bodies are not located in a  position to be readily affected by contaminants released at the site.   2.9 Geology and Hydrogeology  The site is located in the Coachella Valley of Southern California.  The Coachella Valley is part of  the tectonically active Salton Trough, which is a closed, internally draining basin bound by the  San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains to the southwest; the San Bernardino Mountains to the  northwest; and the Little San Bernardino and Orocopia Mountains to the northeast and east.   These mountain ranges, and the basement rock underlying the Coachella Valley, are primarily  composed of granitic and metamorphic rock.  Within the Coachella Valley, the basement complex  is overlain by a series of unconsolidated and semi‐consolidated continental clastic sediments  eroded from the surrounding mountain ranges; lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla; and  wind‐blown sand deposited in the active blow‐sand area of Riverside County (DWR, 1964).  The  site is located on lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla.    The northwest trending San Andreas fault zone is the major geologic feature of the Coachella  Valley.  The Banning, Mission Creek, and Garnet Hill faults, which are part of the San Andreas  fault system, divide the Coachella Valley into four distinct hydrogeologic subbasins.  Each  subbasin is further divided into subareas, based on either the type of water‐bearing formation,  water quality, areas of confined groundwater, forebay areas, groundwater divides, or surface  water divides.  The site is located within the Thermal subarea of the Indio subbasin.  This subarea  consists of the confined portion of the Indio subbasin, where water from the up‐gradient Palm  August 3, 2018 ‐ 7 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Springs subarea moves into the interbedded sands, silts and clays underlying the central portion  of the valley.  Groundwater in this subarea generally flows in a southeasterly direction toward  the Salton Sea.  The water‐bearing materials in this area have been divided into four units:  a  semi‐perched zone at the ground surface and extending to a depth of up to 100 feet below  ground surface [bgs]; an upper aquifer which is 150 to 300 feet thick; a lower aquifer in excess of  500 feet thick; and an aquitard between these two aquifers which is 100 to 200 feet thick.  The  semi‐perched zone may be the uppermost water‐bearing zone under the site.  Water quality  within this zone is generally poor.  The deeper and upper aquifers are typically used for water  supply.  Throughout the Thermal subarea, the horizontal permeability is several times the vertical  permeability resulting in a predominantly lateral flow of groundwater (DWR, 1964).    The depth to groundwater at the site was evaluated by contacting Mr. Saul Montalvo with the  Coachella Valley Water District [CVWD].  Mr. Montalvo indicated that the depth to groundwater  in the CVWD production well located approximately 0.3 miles south of the southeast corner of  the site was 67.8 feet below ground surface [bgs] on June 26, 2018.  Note that the CVWD obtains  depth to water information from production wells that tend to tap deeper aquifers and may not  represent uppermost groundwater.  Note that CVWD recharge basins are located 0.1 miles south  of the site.    3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE  3.1 Onsite Observations  Earth Systems personnel visited the site on July 17 and 18, 2018, to observe current site  conditions and adjacent land use.  Photographs of selected onsite features are presented in  Appendix B.  A summary of our findings is presented below.     The site was observed to consist of former agricultural fields and undeveloped desert  (Photos 1‐3).  Native vegetation was established throughout the site and did not show  unusual signs of stress other than from drought.  As shown in photo 3, the agricultural  areas appeared to have been unused for many years.     The 3 building areas and 1 concrete pad identified in the 2006a Earth Systems ESA were  found as were the two building sites adjacent to Madison Street (Figure 2).  The 1  remaining building onsite was constructed of hand‐made adobe brick and was in a run‐ down condition (Photo 4).  It is clearly visible in the 1956 aerial photographs for the site,  but not visible in the 1939 photograph.    All‐terrain vehicle tracks crossed the primarily the southern, central and western portions  of the site.  More substantial dirt farm roads crossed the site in a grid pattern.     Minor dumping of debris was found at the edges of the site and near the three former  building areas and consisted of landscaping, typical household and construction debris  (Photo 5).  Hazardous materials were not observed in the dumped materials.  Several  areas of more extensive dumping are identified on Figure 2.     August 3, 2018 ‐ 8 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC   Evidence of the onsite manufacture or storage of hazardous materials was not observed;  though small amounts of asbestos concrete [AC] pipe was found at the west, central, and  south parts of the site (Photo 6).     One of the three wells identified in the 2006 ESA was located.  It was not abandoned.  The  other wells were likely hidden under debris or brush.  In discussions with Mr. King, of  Andalusia Country Club, he said that two additional water wells were located on the site.   One was associated with a former residence (since removed) located at the southeast  corner of the adjacent to Madison Avenue.  That well was capped for future use,  according to Mr. King.  The other well was located west of the former ranch house in the  southwest corner of the site.  That well was abandoned according to Mr. King.  No  documentation was obtained as to the work done on the two aforementioned wells.      Evidence was not observed during the site visit of the presence of drums, storage tanks,  drywells, potential PCB‐containing equipment (such as transformers), sumps, pits, ponds,  lagoons, stained soil, stressed vegetation (other than due to weather), or onsite septic  system.    3.2 Site Vicinity Observations  The site vicinity generally consisted of undeveloped, former agricultural, and residential  properties.  Properties adjacent to the site consisted of the following:  North: Developed and undeveloped residential properties  East: Andalusia Country Club  South: Former agricultural land; single family residences; partially developed single‐ family residential neighborhoods; and a levee with CVWD recharge basins  beyond  West: Undeveloped and mountainous land  Evidence was not observed that the site was adversely affected by activities on properties in the  site vicinity.    4.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION  Information regarding the history of the site was obtained from various sources, as listed in the  references section of this report.  The results of this research are summarized chronologically in  the following table.  Footnotes regarding the sources of historical information are provided  following the table.    August 3, 2018 ‐ 9 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Table 1 – Summary of Historical Site Usage  Date Source Discussion  1939 2007 ESSW ESA  Update – Aerial  Photo  The site was primarily agricultural land with some undeveloped land along the  northwest and south margins.  The immediate vicinity was agricultural land,  and undeveloped native desert was in the extended vicinity.  Lake Cahuilla to  the northwest had not been constructed at that time.  1‐17‐1956 Earth Systems  aerial photo  archive  The site was primarily agricultural.  The northeast, south and west potions are  undeveloped native desert.  The dwelling and farm building in the north central  part of the site and the two dwellings to the northeast were visible.  A home  east of Madison, that later becomes incorporated into the site when Madison is  realigned, is visible. Roadways in the vicinity were unimproved.  The vicinity was  agricultural and undeveloped.        1956 USGS  Topographic  map (Valerie  only)  The portion of the site east of the original location of Madison Street was  primarily agricultural with buildings near the north center.  The site vicinity was  undeveloped or agricultural with scattered dwellings/farm buildings.  Madison  Street and Avenue 58 were light duty roads.  1959 USGS  Topographic  map (La Quinta  only)  An unimproved road skirted the northwestern edge of the site south of Avenue  58.  The site vicinity was undeveloped and agricultural land with scattered  dwellings.    1972 USGS  Topographic  map (Valerie  only)  Changes are not depicted onsite.  Two buildings had been constructed near the  building east of Madison Street.      4‐11‐1973 Earth Systems  aerial photo  archive  Much of the south half of the site was agricultural (fallow or active), though the  southernmost, west, and northeast portions appeared to be undeveloped native  desert.  Mature native shrubs on the north and northeast portions of the site  were aligned in a diagonal pattern – northwest to southeast.  Farm buildings  and/or residences were adjacent to Avenue 58, on the east side of Madison  Street approximately ¼ mile south of Avenue 58, and near the north central part  of the site.  The roadways in the vicinity were dirt.  Properties in the vicinity to  the north and east were primarily agricultural (fallow or active) with scattered  residences; and undeveloped desert or mountainous terrain to the west.     6‐20‐1974 Earth Systems  aerial photo  archive  The site and vicinity were generally unchanged.  1980 USGS  Topographic  map (La Quinta  only)  Two dwellings were located in the north portion of the site.  Lake Cahuilla to the  west‐northwest had been constructed.  A few more dwellings were scattered in  the vicinity.  5‐26‐1980 Earth Systems  aerial photo  archive  By 1980, a residence with a U‐shaped access road was in the northeast portion  of the site.  In the vicinity, the parcel north of the northwest corner of the site  had been cleared and developed with what appears to be a nursery.    1981 USGS  Topographic  map (Martinez  Mountain only)  Approximately 100 acres of the east half of the site was agricultural with  unimproved farm roads.  Unimproved roads crossed the southwest portion of  the site and generally paralleled an aqueduct/water pipeline.  A second  aqueduct/water pipeline crossed the center of the site from west to east.  A  farm building and a dwelling were located near the north central part of the site,  approximately 400 feet apart ¼ mile south of Avenue 58.  Fences throughout  the site appear as red or red and black dashed lines.  The vicinity was  undeveloped or agricultural land.  An intermittent stream was beyond the levee  approximately ¼ mile southwest of the southwest corner of the site.  August 3, 2018 ‐ 10 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  1988 USGS  Topographic  map (Martinez  Mountain only)  By 1988 several unimproved roads had appeared onsite.  Two dwellings were in  the north portion of the site, one about 650 feet south of Avenue 58 and the  second about 200 feet south of Avenue 58.  In the vicinity, more scattered  dwellings had been constructed.   9‐25‐1996 Google Earth  aerial photo  Much of the central portion of the site appeared to be former agricultural land.   Undeveloped land was along the west boundary and in the southern portion.   Dirt farm roads in a grid pattern and dirt trails crossed throughout the site.   Madison Street was a two‐lane unimproved road.  Avenues 58 and 60 were  unimproved roads.    Dwellings and/or outbuildings or date groves were located  near the northeast corner of the site, near the north central boundary, near the  northeast corner of the site on the east side of the former location of Madison  Street, and at the southeast corner of the site adjacent the Madison Street.   The  site vicinity was undeveloped, agricultural, new and older residential (including  a horse ranch beyond the southwest corner), and a commercial building beyond  the northwest boundary.  Lake Cahuilla Park was less than ½ mile to the  northwest.        5‐8‐2002 Google Earth  aerial photo  The site was generally unchanged.  The commercial operation to the northwest  was largely reduced and development of properties in the extended vicinity to  the north had continued.  Trilogy La Quinta was under development to the  southeast.   11‐16 ‐2004 Google Earth  aerial photo  The residences east of the old location of Madison Street had been razed and  the lots graded.  Several hundred truckloads of soil had been deposited on the  southernmost parcel of the site.  In the vicinity the new location of Madison  Street had been established and grading and development of Andalusia Country  Club to the east was well underway.  5‐24‐2009 Google Earth  aerial photo  By 2009, the dwellings near the north central boundaries of the site had been  razed.  The soil deposit area at the south end of the site appeared to have been  graded and dust suppressant applied.  This practice of soil dumping/grading  continued through June 2011 (see Section 6.1).  Development of the vicinity and  the extended vicinity to the north, east and southeast had continued, including  residential grading beyond the northwest boundary of the site.  Water recharge  basins had been constructed to the south.     4‐11‐2014 Google Earth  aerial photo  The site and vicinity were generally unchanged.   2‐17‐2018 Google Earth  aerial photo  The site and vicinity were generally unchanged.   Historical information footnotes:    We attempted to obtain historical information from a standard set of resources, including historical aerial photographs,  historical USGS topographic maps, Sanborn fire insurance maps, historical street directories, chain‐of‐title documents, city  building permit files, and personnel interview.  However, historical information was not obtained from some sources, as  follows:  Sanborn Fire Insurance maps: Based on prior research, Earth Systems is aware that Sanborn Fire Insurance maps are not  available for the site or vicinity.   Historical City Directories:  Historical Street Directories were not requested due to the relatively recent development of the  site vicinity; and due to the primary historical agricultural usage of the site and vicinity.    Chain of Title documents:  Chain of title documents were not provided prior to publication of this report and, therefore,  were not reviewed.   City Building Permits were requested but the results of that file search were not available by the time this report went to  publication.       August 3, 2018 ‐ 11 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  5.0 RECORDS REVIEW  5.1 Agency Database Search Report  A report summarizing the information available from regulatory agencies regarding sites that  generate, store, use, and/or have released hazardous materials was obtained from a firm that  specializes in maintaining a database of this type of information.  The publications reviewed in  the database search are referenced in the database report, presented in Appendix C.  The search  radii used for each list were in accordance with the US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13 guidelines as  measured from the approximate property boundary.  Given the limitations of the agency’s  plotting tool, only an approximate boundary of the site could be selected.  In one case, a location  offsite was included as an onsite listing and vice versa.  Significant information obtained in the  database search is summarized below.   The site is listed in the database report as follows:   o Riverside Co Fire (Map Key 1): incident located behind 58500 Madison Street (on the east  side of the former location of Madison Avenue, approximately 1,400 feet south of Avenue  58) is included on the California Hazardous Materials Report System [CHMIRS].  On  October 15, 2002, a caller reported that “a construction site unearthed a large dumping  area of drug lab waste.”  The administrative agency was the Riverside County Department  of Environmental Health [RCDEH], cleanup was conducted by “contractor,” and the  incident was “contained.”  Given the age of the incident and oversite by RCDEH, this is  not an REC.  This is identified as Home 4 in the current report.  o Rindlesbach Construction (Map Key 2), located at 59781 Madison Street, is offsite near  the northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 60.  The facility is listed in the  database report as on the Hazardous Waste Information System [HAZNET] database,  which documents hazardous waste manifest data.  The facility handles asbestos‐ containing waste.  The California Department of Toxic Substances Control [DTSC]  monitors the HAZNET database.  No problems regarding disposal of hazardous materials  are reported for the listing and this is not an REC.   Two sites within the search radii are listed a total of seven times in the database report, but  one of the sites (Andalusia Country Club, aka, Coral Option I LLC (Map Key 3), located at 81120  Avenue 60, east of the Madison Street/Avenue 60 intersection) does not appear to pose a  threat to the site due to the distance, direction, or nature of the issues at those sites (such as  registered above ground storage tanks or hazardous waste generators with no reported  problems).  The remaining site is summarized as follows:   o PGA West (Map Key 4), located at 80202 Avenue 58, is located approximately 0.21‐mile  northwest of the subject site.  The site is listed as a Leaking Underground Storage Tank  [LUST] and Riverside County Local Oversight Program [LOP] site and the status of the site  is “Completed ‐ case closed”.  This is not an REC.    August 3, 2018 ‐ 12 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC   The database search report has nine listings categorized as unmapped, due to vague address  listings or the inability of the automated search system to identify the location of the release  site.  A review of these listings did not identify them to be within the search radii.    The sites identified in the agency database review do not appear to be RECs for the subject site  due to the distance, direction, status, or nature of the issue at these sites.   5.2 California EPA, State Water Resources Control Board  The California Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], State Water Resources Control Board  [SWRCB] GeoTracker website was accessed to research records on file regarding known problems  at the site.  Other than the issues discussed in Section 5.1, the database search found no results  for the site or properties in the vicinity.  5.3 California Department of Toxic Substances Control  The California Department of Toxic Substances Control [DTSC] EnviroStor website was accessed  to research records on file regarding known problems at the site or in the site vicinity.  Other  than the issues discussed in Section 5.1, the database search found no results for the site or  properties in the vicinity.    5.4 Tribal Records  This site is not within ¼ mile of tribal land, and therefore Tribal records for the subject property  or adjoining properties were not reviewed.      5.5 Engineering and Institutional Controls   Engineering and Institutional Controls [EICs] (i.e. deed restrictions and restrictive zoning) were  not identified for the subject site in the agency database search report.  Engineering and  Institutional Controls to a radius of ¼ mile were not identified.    5.6 Environmental Cleanup Liens  Recorded Environmental Cleanup Liens [ECLs] on a property are indicators that contamination  exists or existed at the site.  ECLs are “encumbrances on a property for the recovery of incurred  cleanup costs on the part of a state, tribal, or federal government agency or other third party”  (EPA 2006).  Mr. Nolan Sparks, Vice President of T D Desert Development (site owner) stated that  they are not aware of ECLs assigned to the site.      5.7 CA Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Maps  The California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, & Geothermal [DOGGR] maps on  the DOGGR website were reviewed for information regarding historic oil‐well or geothermal  drilling activities near the site.  The maps and databases did not depict permitted oil or  geothermal wells within 1 mile of the site.    August 3, 2018 ‐ 13 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  5.8 Riverside County Building Department Records  The RCIT website lists several permits for the site.  Most are permits for residential buildings  or upgrades.  The following permits are of interest to this assessment:   100 amp change of service to pump   100 amp service to 5 HP well pump   Trap and skeet buildings   200 amp service to 15HP and 40HP motor   Add heaters and electric to greenhouse  6.0 INTERVIEWS, GENERAL RESEARCH, AND PRIOR REPORTS  6.1 Current Owners/Occupants/Operators  Mr. Nolan Sparks, Vice President of T D Desert Development [T D] (site owner) was contacted  regarding his knowledge of the site.  Mr. Sparks provided the following information:     T D bought the land November 17, 2000 and “no significant alterations have taken place  except the developers of Trilogy to the southeast dumped excess soil from their grading  operations on the south end of our land about 15 years ago.”     T D has no knowledge/suspicion of the release of hazardous materials onsite.    T D is unaware of “any previous underground storage tanks and we have not installed  any.”   T D is not aware of ECLs assigned to the site.   T D is unaware of any septic systems onsite.   Mr. Sparks recalls that T D abandoned two of the three wells observed onsite at the time  of the 2006 ESA Update.  He believes that the third was plugged only in case it was put  into use at a later date.   Mr. Sparks stated that “despite (T D’s) efforts, illegal dumping has occurred” onsite.    6.2 Past Owners/Occupants/Operators  From the 2007 Earth Systems Southwest ESA Update for portions of the site:   “Prior owners (operators or employees) of the site could not be contacted to be interviewed.   Regarding the most recent owners, this is not considered significant since agricultural  operations on‐site had ceased by 1990 and these parties would be unlikely to have  information regarding historical agricultural usage of the site.  Contact information for  owners or operators during the agricultural usage years was not available.      August 3, 2018 ‐ 14 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  This assessment is still pertinent, given that few if any changes have occurred onsite since the  2007 report.   6.3 Owners/Occupants of Neighboring Properties  The US EPA recommends that interviews with persons on adjoining properties be conducted for  properties that are “abandoned.”  Mr. Nolan Sparks, Vice President of T D Desert Development  (site owner) stated that they monitor the site on a regular basis, but illegal dumping still occurs.   The site is not considered to be abandoned and interviews of owners/occupants of neighboring  properties were not conducted.   6.4 Riverside County Department of Environmental Health  Mr. Paul Mitchell with the RCDEH is currently in charge of overseeing agricultural sites containing  elevated concentrations of pesticide residues.  Mr. Mitchell indicated that pesticide residues that  resulted from use in conformance with legal requirements at the time of use are not subject to  hazardous waste regulations, unless those soils are exported from the site (at which time they  become subject to hazardous waste regulations).  However, the RCDEH is concerned that onsite  workers and future residents may suffer adverse health effects from the presence of these  residues when the agricultural properties are converted to other uses.  The RCDEH has started  requiring that Phase II investigations be performed to evaluate whether pesticide residues are  present at elevated concentrations.  Note that information regarding leaking underground storage tank and other cleanup sites in  Riverside County is available from the State GeoTracker information system (see Section 5.2).  6.5 Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office    Ms. Carolyn Brown with the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner’s office [RCAC] was  contacted previously for general information regarding pesticide use.  Ms. Brown indicated that  the pesticide DDT was widely used throughout the Coachella Valley prior to its ban in the early  1970's.  Consequently, it should be assumed that DDT and/or other organochlorine pesticides  [OCPs] could have been used on all properties used for agriculture prior to that time.    6.6 Common Farm Irrigation Materials  Mr. Tom Brickley with Brickley Environmental, an asbestos removal contractor, was contacted  during a previous project regarding the use of asbestos piping in irrigation systems.  Mr. Brickley  indicated that they have been involved in the removal of asbestos‐containing irrigation piping at  numerous sites, and that finding this type of piping common.  He also stated that these pipes are  not considered a hazardous material and can be left in place, but are often removed due to  engineering and site development considerations.  If the pipes are removed, the removal needs  to be performed by a licensed asbestos‐removal contractor and disposed to a permitted landfill  following appropriate protocols.  The costs to remove and dispose of the asbestos pipe is  dependent upon its condition, but Mr. Brickley stated that pipe in good condition can be removed  for an average cost of about $500 to $2,000 per 100 linear feet of pipe.  August 3, 2018 ‐ 15 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Mr. Bob Sheppard with CV Grading, a contractor that installs irrigation systems, was contacted  during a previous project for information regarding typical uses of asbestos‐cement [AC] pipe.   He indicated that AC pipe is used in irrigation systems when the pressure is anticipated to exceed  the design strength of common concrete pipe.  Commonly‐used concrete pipe has a design  strength sufficient for a hydrostatic head of about 20 feet, while AC pipe can have design  strengths of 50 to 100 feet of hydrostatic head.  AC pipe is more expensive than common  concrete pipe, and therefore AC pipe is usually used only when the head is anticipated to exceed  20 feet of head.  Non‐pressurized, gravity‐feed irrigation systems are usually constructed of non‐ asbestos concrete pipe.    6.7 Other Sources of Information  Earth Systems Southwest [ESSW], a prior entity of Earth Systems Pacific, conducted an ESA and  Supplemental Pesticide Sampling in 2006 for portions of the site.  A 2007 ESSW ESA Update was  conducted to satisfy the requirements of Coachella Valley Water District [CVWD] for installation  of irrigation lines.  Summaries of the three reports, are as follows.  6.7.1 2006 ESSW ESA  Based on a review of historical aerial photos, the 2006 ESSW ESA report indicated that  from as early as 1974 until 1990, the majority of the site was used agriculturally.  AC vent  pipes were observed associated with the irrigation system on and/or near the site.   However, AC pipe is not normally used subsurface in gravity‐flow irrigation systems and  we believe it is unlikely for subsurface AC pipes to be present.  Non‐hazardous debris and  trash were observed but did not warrant removal.  The site vicinity was observed to consist of residential, agricultural, golf resort, park, and  undeveloped properties.  Three abandoned wells were identified near the subject site,  within the boundaries of the proposed Andalusia West development.  The wells appeared  to have not been properly abandoned.  One well, located approximately 100 feet east of  Lateral E1, was noted to contain a significant layer of oily, odorous liquid above the  groundwater level, which is probably lubricating oil dating from prior use of the well.  Due  to the off‐site locations of these wells, further investigations of these features do not  appear warranted.  Former building areas were noted near the site, but not within the  alignments of the existing or proposed laterals.  Evidence of a hazardous materials release  was not noted in association with these building areas.  While the building areas may  contain abandoned underground storage tanks or pesticide storage or mixing facilities,  these building areas were not located in a position to be likely to affect the existing or  proposed lateral alignments.  Therefore, further investigations regarding these building  areas did not appear warranted in the lateral alignment project.  Evidence was not  observed that the site was adversely affected by activities in the site vicinity.  The agency database review did not list the site, and sites in the vicinity were not  identified to pose a risk to the subject site (ESSW, 2007).  August 3, 2018 ‐ 16 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  6.7.2 2006 ESSW Supplemental Pesticide Sampling  In June 2006, surface soil samples were collected along the irrigation laterals within the  West Andalusia Development.  Sixteen samples were collected to evaluate the possible  presence of Organochlorine Pesticide [OCP] residues at concentrations of concern in the  soil due to the historic agricultural use of the site.  The samples were combined in pairs  to yield eight composite samples.  The laboratory results of those analyses indicated that  DDT, DDE, DDD, and Toxaphene were detected at concentrations above the laboratory  reporting limits.  Other OCPs were not detected.  DDE and DDD are by‐products of the  breakdown of DDT.  Maximum concentrations of DDT, DDE, DDD, and Toxaphene were  less than both (1) the US EPA Preliminary Remediation Goals for residential usage [PRG‐ r] and (2) the California, Title 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentration [TTLC], a California  criterion for defining a waste as hazardous.  The analytical results from the June 2006  sampling episode are summarized and included in Table 1.  These results suggested that  pesticide residues from those locations do not significantly affect the site.  Further  evaluation of this matter did not appear warranted and was not recommended (ESSW,  2007).    6.7.3 2006 ESSW ESA Update with Supplemental Pesticides Sampling  In addition to an Update of the prior ESA and finding no significant changes onsite other  than one piece of asbestos‐cement [AC] pipe that should be disposed appropriately  offsite, the 2006 ESA Update with Supplemental Sampling included collection of eight soil  samples from irrigation lateral locations that were not previously sampled.  The eight  samples were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides [OCPs] and the results show that  pesticide residues in some of the samples exceed the TTLC for DDT‐related compounds  and/or exceed the PRG‐r for Toxaphene.  The samples with elevated pesticide residue  concentrations were from three adjacent blocks of agricultural fields.  Further  investigations of these areas were recommended.  It should also be noted that evaluation  and sampling of the former residential areas was not completed since these were not  associated with the lateral realignment.  An evaluation was conducted for the potential presence of subsurface AC pipe that  concluded that further investigations did not appear warranted.     6.8 Prior Experience Regarding Pesticides at Farms  The potential presence of pesticide residues is an issue affecting land used for agriculture prior  to 1990.  Of primary concern are OCPs, which includes DDT, DDE, DDD, Gamma‐BHC (Lindane),  Technical Chlordane, Dieldrin, Endosulfan II, Endrin, Endrin Aldehyde, Lindane, and Toxaphene.   These compounds are notable for both their toxicity and their longevity in the soil.  As such,  residues of these compounds can be found at concentrations of concern well after usage of the  material has ceased.  Some of these chemicals were widely used well into the 1980’s.    Most OCPs are listed in the California Code of Regulations [CCR] governing the classification of  hazardous waste (CCR Title 22).  The Total Threshold Limit Concentration [TTLC] for DDT and its  August 3, 2018 ‐ 17 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  breakdown by‐products is 1 mg/kg, which is the concentration of DDT which would classify a  waste as hazardous.  The US EPA Regional Screening Level for a residential setting [RSL‐r] for DDT  is 1.9 mg/kg, for Toxaphene is 0.49 mg/kg; and for Dieldrin is 0.034 mg/kg (US EPA 2016).  The  RSL‐r is based on health risks from exposure to the substance in a residential setting for 70 years,  and would be an appropriate comparison criterion for assessing the risks posed by pesticide  residues to residential occupants of a property.      Earth Systems has conducted numerous Phase II investigations of agricultural sites.  OCPs have  been found at concentrations of concern at about ¼ of these sites.  The most common pesticides  found at concentrations of concern are DDT, DDE, Toxaphene, and Dieldrin, which were de‐ registered for use between 1972 and 1990.  We have not identified a pattern indicative of where  elevated levels of OCPs are found, though spills at storage areas are more frequent than elevated  concentrations in field areas.  The level of concern expressed by the regulatory agencies  regarding the potential presence of pesticide residues has increased in the last few years,  including the publication of a guidance document by the California Department of Toxic  Substance Control [DTSC] concerning sampling of agricultural properties that are proposed to be  developed as schools.  That guidance document may become a basis for defining the “standard  of care” for the evaluation of pesticide residues on agricultural land.  Given our prior experience  with pesticide residues and the increasing focus this issue has received by the regulatory  agencies, we believe testing for the presence of OCP residues may appropriate for land that was  in use for agriculture after the development of OCPs and prior to 1990, particularly if site usage  changes to residential/schools.  7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS  This report presents the findings of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment [ESA] conducted  by Earth Systems Pacific [Earth Systems] for 377.206 acres located west of Madison Street, south  of Avenue 58, and north of Avenue 60, in La Quinta, Riverside County, California [the site].  We  have endeavored to perform this ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM  Practice E1527‐13.  Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Sections  1.5 and 1.6 of this report.  The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate the site for the  presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions [REC] related to the current or past use,  handling, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials or petroleum products on or near the  subject property.  This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with this  property except as discussed in the project summary presented below.  Our findings and  conclusions are summarized as follows:      1. The site was observed to consist of undeveloped desert, former agricultural land, and  dwelling/farm building sites.  2. Construction and household debris were noted primarily adjacent to the building sites  and along the edges of the site.  The debris does not appear to contain hazardous  materials and is not considered an REC.    3. Evidence of the onsite manufacture, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials was not  observed except that small amounts of asbestos concrete [AC] pipe were found at the  west, central, and south parts of the site.  The AC pipe is an REC.  August 3, 2018 ‐ 18 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  4. USTs began to be regulated in California in the 1980’s (at least as early as 1956).  Prior to  that time, it was common practice for farms to maintain their own USTs to store fuels for  onsite equipment.  Such USTs were often abandoned in place rather than removed when  they were no longer used.  Records regarding farm USTs are rarely found in the agency  database search.  Evidence of these features was not observed during the site visit.  The  concern with USTs is that a release can occur and not be noticed until the UST is removed.   USTs are commonly found abandoned in place on older farm properties.  The potential  presence of USTs is an REC.    5. Septic systems provide a pathway for contaminants to be released into the ground, if  contaminants are disposed into the waste water system.  We did not obtain information  that indicates hazardous materials were disposed into the septic system and it is unlikely  that the current systems have been used in this manner.  However, this could be a  problem in areas where maintenance and repair of farm machinery occurred.  If this issue  is of concern, a survey for the old systems including sampling can be conducted to  evaluate whether hazardous materials have been released in association with these  onsite septic systems  6. The site was used for agriculture prior to 1990.  Since soil sampling and testing for  pesticides in prior investigations of the site was limited to locations of irrigation laterals  onsite, the potential exists for residues of organochlorine pesticides [OCPs] to be present  in other agricultural and building areas of the subject site.  Those prior investigations  found areas where the OCPs exceeded the results show that pesticide residues in some  of the samples exceed the TTLC for DDT‐related compounds and/or exceed the PRG‐r for  Toxaphene.  The potential presence of OCP residues is an REC.   7. The potential exists for AC pipe to have been used in the former irrigation system due to  the prior agricultural use of the site.  However, AC pipe is normally used at sites where  more than 20 feet of hydrostatic head is anticipated due to topographic relief.  The subject  site is relatively flat.  Therefore, the potential presence of subsurface AC pipe is not  considered to be a concern at this site, other than as discussed above.  8. County building permits cite service to “pump” and “well pump;” and prior reports cite  the presence of three improperly abandoned wells “within the boundaries of the  proposed Andalusia West development.”  T D Desert Development (current owner of site)  abandoned two of the wells, but the wells were not the three wells found in the 2006  Earth Systems studies.  This is an REC.   9. Riverside County Department of Building and Safety cites a permit for “trap and skeet  buildings.”  Shooting ranges and the like often have an excess of heavy metals in the soil  from spent cartridges.  Evidence of a shooting range was not observed on the site during  the site visit.  If this is a concern of you, it can be investigated further.   10. The potential exists for the presence of lead residue from lead‐based paint in the soil  around buildings.  This is an REC.  11. The potential exists for the presence of OCPs around buildings, where pesticides were  stored or applied around the perimeter of the buildings.  This is an REC.   August 3, 2018 ‐ 19 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  12. Evidence was not observed during the site visit of the presence of drums, storage tanks,  drywells, potential PCB‐containing equipment (such as transformers), sumps, pits, ponds,  lagoons, stained soil, stressed vegetation (other than due to weather), or onsite septic  systems.  13. The site vicinity consists of primarily agricultural, residential, and golf course properties.   Evidence was not observed that the site was adversely affected by activities in the site  vicinity.  Between approximately 2004 and 2011, development activities of Trilogy La  Quinta included deposition of surplus soil onto the southern parcel of the subject site.   This was done in an organized manner and with the owner’s knowledge and it is unlikely  that the soil contained hazardous materials.  This is not an REC.     14. The site was identified in the agency database review.  However, the listings for the site  and the site vicinity do not appear to pose a risk to the subject site based on the status of  those sites, the distance, or direction from the subject site, or the nature of the issue(s)  at those sites.    8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS  RECs were identified for this site (Section 1.5, and Items 4 through 10 in Section 7).  Further  investigations are recommended as follows:   Data gap of unavailability of City of La Quinta building permit file review: City Building  Department record reviews will be provided when those documents become available.     AC pipe found onsite should be properly removed by a licensed asbestos‐removal  contractor.   There is the potential that building areas may contain abandoned underground storage  tanks and or septic systems.  A geophysical survey for these features is warranted and, if  found, appropriate soil sampling for the potential presence of contaminants where  appropriate is warranted due to agricultural usage of portions of the site.      Since prior soil sampling and testing for pesticides was limited to locations of irrigation  laterals onsite, soil sampling and analysis is warranted for former building and agricultural  areas of the site.    An inspection of known wells onsite is warranted.  Wells that are planned for  abandonment or were improperly abandoned should be abandoned according to all  applicable state and/or county ordinances and regulations.   There is the potential for the presence of lead residue in the soil around buildings from  lead‐based paint.  Soil sampling with analysis is warranted.   There is the potential for the presence of heavy metals in the soil relative to the trap and  skeet buildings.  If this is a concern, soil sampling with analysis could be conducted.    ‐o0o‐  August 3, 2018 ‐ 20 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  REFERENCES    Brickley Environmental, 1998, Tom Brickley, personal interview, February 24, 1998.   California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources,  http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/Pages/WellFinder.aspx, website accessed July 14,  2018.  California Department of Food and Agriculture, 1985, Agricultural Sources of DDT Residues in  California’s Environment, dated September 1985.  California Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor website,  http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/default.asp, accessed July 20, 2018.   California Department of Water Resources [DWR], 1964, Bulletin Number 108 – Coachella Valley  Investigation, July 1964.  California Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board,  https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/, website accessed July 20, 2018.  City of La Quinta, City Clerk, Request for Public Records, July 20, 2018.  _____, Department of Design and Development, Planning Division, City of La Quinta, Official  Zoning Map, dated July 2016.  Coachella Valley Grading, 1999, Bob Sheppard, personal interview, August 1999.  Coachella Valley Water District [CVWD], Saul Montalvo, Engineering Aide II, email  communication, July 17, 2018.  Earth Systems Pacific, aerial photograph archives, as listed below:    Date Source/Flight Frame Approximate Scale  01‐17‐1956 Fairchild, C‐22386       1:106          1:2000‐  04‐11‐73 RCFCD 12        ‐ ‐  6‐20‐1974 RCFCD 780 1:2112‐  5‐26‐1980 RCFCD  808  ‐ ‐  Earth Systems Southwest (prior entity of Earth Systems Pacific), 2006a, Report of Phase I  Environmental Site Assessment Irrigation Laterals Within West Andalusia Development  West of Madison Street Between Avenues 58 and 60 La Quinta, California, File No.: 09305‐ 06, Doc. No.: 06‐06‐700, dated June 1, 2006.  _______, 2006b, Supplemental Pesticide Sampling West Andalusia – Irrigation Laterals West of  Madison Street between Avenues 58 and 60, La Quinta, California. File No.: 09305‐06,  Doc. No.: 06‐07‐705, dated July 6, 2006.   _______, 2007, Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update with Supplemental  Pesticides Sampling, West Andalusia – Irrigation Laterals, West of Madison Street  between Avenues 58 and 60, La Quinta, Riverside County, California File No.: 09305‐08,  Doc. No.: 07‐01‐752, dated January 12, 2007.  August 3, 2018 ‐ 21 ‐ File No.: 300300‐005    Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  ERIS, Database Report, 377.206 Acres W. of Madison Street, La Quinta CA, Project No.: 300300‐ 005, Order No.: 20180717212, dated July 19, 2018.  Google Earth, aerial photograph archives, as listed below:    Date Source/Flight  9‐25‐1996 USGS  5‐8‐2002 Landsat/Copernicus; 2018 DigitalGlobe  11‐16 ‐2004 Landsat/Copernicus; 2018 DigitalGlobe  5‐24‐2009 USDA Farm Service Agency  4‐11‐2014 USDA Farm Service Agency  2‐17‐2018 Landsat/Copernicus; 2018 DigitalGlobe  Riverside County Agricultural Commission, 1997, Carolyn Brown, personal communication, July  17, 1997.  Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, 2007, Paul Mitchell, personal  communication, August 2007.  Riverside County Information Technology, Riverside County Geographic Information Services,  http://mmc.rivcoit.org/MMC_Public/Custom/disclaimer/Default.htm, website accessed  July 18, 2018.    Saltzman, Sarina, and Bruno Yaron, editors, 1986, Pesticides in Soil, published by Van Nostrand  Reinhold Soil Sciences Series, New York.  T D Desert Development, Nolan Sparks, Vice President, email contact July 21, 2018.  Thomson, W. T., 1998.  Agricultural Chemicals: Book I – Insecticides, 14th Edition.  Thomson  Publications, Fresno, California.  United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute Indio, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo‐revised 1972.   _____.  La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle, 1959, photo‐revised 1980.   _____.  Martinez Mtn., Calif. Quadrangle, 1981, photo‐revised 1988.  _____.  Valerie, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo‐revised 1972.  US Department of Environmental Protection, 2000, Region 9, Preliminary Remediation Goals  Table 2000.  _____, 2013, 40 CFR Part 312, Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries, Final Rule,  dated November 13, 2013.    EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Appendix A    Figures  Scale: 1" = 2,000’ 0 2,000’ 4,000’ Figure 1 Site Location Approximate Site Boundary Base Map: USGS 7-1/2' Quadrangle, Indio, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo-revised 1972; La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle, 1959, photo- revised 1980; Martinez Mtn., Calif. Quadrangle, 1981, photo-revised 1988; Valerie, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo-revised 1972. File No.: 300300-005 SITE Earth Systems 8/3/2018 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California LEGEND LEGEND Figure 2 Site Layout Approximate Site Boundary Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018. Earth Systems 8/3/2018 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California File No.: 300300-005Madison S t ree tMadison S t ree t Avenue 58Avenue 58 Avenue 60Avenue 60 Residential Residential Andalusia Country Club Andalusia Country Club Levee Levee Rindlesbach Construction Rindlesbach Construction ResidentialResidential Trilogy at La Quinta Country Club Trilogy at La Quinta Country Club Home 1Home 1 Home 2Home 2 Home 3 (Old Ranch)Home 3 (Old Ranch) Well 1Well 1 Well 2Well 2 Well 3Well 3 Well 4Well 4 Well 5Well 5 Former FarmlandFormer Farmland Concrete SlabConcrete Slab Approximate Areas of Concentrated Debris Approximate Well Locations Approximate Scale: 1" = 875’ 0 875’ 1,750’ Approximate Home Locations Residential Residential Former Location of Madison StreetFormer Location of Madison StreetHome 4Home 4 Home 5Home 5 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Appendix B    Photographs  Storm Drain Inlet Site Photographs Page 1 of 1 Photo 1: View south from north central part of site. Photo 3: Former farm land in central part of site. Photo 5: Debris at House 1 area.Photo 6: Asbestos cement pipe on west side of site. Photo 4: Debris at House 2 area. Photo 2: View north of east side of site on old Madison Street. 8/3/2018 Earth Systems 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California File No. 300300-005 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Appendix C    Agency Database Search Report   Project Property:377.206 Acres W. of Madison n/a La Quinta CA Project No:300300-005 Report Type:Database Report Order No: 20180717212 Requested by:Earth Systems Pacific Date Completed: July 19, 2018 2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Table of Contents Notice:IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report:This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report:No page of this report can be used without this cover page,this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s)may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse:Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use,including damages caused to third parties,and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS:The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc.("ERIS")using various sources of information,including information provided by Federal and State government departments.The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report,and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report.This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice.Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate,ERIS disclaims,any and all liability for any errors,omissions,or inaccuracies in such information and data,whether attributable to inadvertence,negligence or otherwise,and for any consequences arising therefrom.Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright:You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above.This Service and Report(s)are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc.Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s)(the "Data")is owned by ERIS or its licensors.The Service,Report(s)and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Table of Contents Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................8 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................9 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.......................................................................................................10 Map...............................................................................................................12 Aerial.............................................................................................................15 Topographic Map..........................................................................................16 Detail Report.................................................................................................17 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................26 Unplottable Report........................................................................................27 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................32 Definitions.....................................................................................................43 3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property:377.206 Acres W. of Madison n/a La Quinta CA Project No:300300-005 Coordinates: Latitude:33.619942 Longitude:-116.255164 UTM Northing:3,720,265.86 UTM Easting:569,089.53 UTM Zone:UTM Zone 11S Elevation:-33 FT Order Information: Order No:20180717212 Date Requested:July 17, 2018 Requested by:Earth Systems Pacific Report Type:Database Report Historicals/Products: Executive Summary 4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Standard Environmental Records Federal rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-IODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA CESQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FED ENG-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED INST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FEMA UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SEMS LIEN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 State rr-RESPONSE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS ODI SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA CESQG RCRA NON GEN FED ENG FED INST ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD RESPONSE Executive Summary: Report Summary 5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-ENVIROSTOR-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELISTED ENVS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HWP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-LDS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SWAT-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-LUST-aa Y .5 0 0 1 0 - 1 rr-DELISTED LST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SWRCB SWF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UST CLOSURE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HHSS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED TNK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-CERS TANK-aa Y .25 0 1 0 -- 1 rr-LUR-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HLUR-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DEED-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-VCP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CLEANUP SITES-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED CTNK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HIST TANK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 Tribal rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED ILST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED IUST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 County rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-KERN AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RIVERSIDE LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 1 0 - 1 rr-UST RIVERSIDE-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SUNNYVALE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 Additional Environmental Records Federal rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 1 --- 1 rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HMIRS-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-NCDL-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 ENVIROSTOR DELISTED ENVS SWF/LF HWP LDS SWAT LUST DELISTED LST UST SWRCB SWF UST CLOSURE HHSS AST DELISTED TNK CERS TANK LUR HLUR DEED VCP CLEANUP SITES DELISTED CTNK HIST TANK INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST DELISTED COUNTY KERN AST RIVERSIDE LOP UST RIVERSIDE SUNNYVALE CUPA FINDS/FRS TRIS HMIRS NCDL 6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MINES-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SSTS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PCB-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 State rr-INSP COMP ENF-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-CDL-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-SCH-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-CHMIRS-aa Y PO 1 ---- 1 rr-HAZNET-aa Y PO 1 1 --- 2 rr-HWSS CLEANUP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DTSC HWF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HIST MANIFEST-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HIST CHMIRS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HIST CORTESE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CDO/CAO-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED HAZ-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED DRYC-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-WASTE DISCHG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-EMISSIONS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-CERS HAZ-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County rr-RIVERSIDE HWG-aa Y .125 0 1 --- 1 rr-RIVERSIDE HZH-aa Y .125 0 1 --- 1 TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS MLTS HIST MLTS MINES ALT FUELS SSTS PCB INSP COMP ENF CDL SCH CHMIRS HAZNET HWSS CLEANUP DTSC HWF HIST MANIFEST HIST CHMIRS HIST CORTESE CDO/CAO DELISTED HAZ DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYC WASTE DISCHG EMISSIONS CERS HAZ RIVERSIDE HWG RIVERSIDE HZH 7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Total:2 5 2 0 0 9 * PO – Property Only * 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. 8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m1d dd-CHMIRS-821802190-aa Riverside Co Fire Behind 58500 Madison Av. La Quinta CA -0.00 / 0.00 -16 p1p-17-821802190-x1x m2d dd-HAZNET-826593254-aa RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION 59781 MADISON ST LA QUINTA CA 922537656 -0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-17-826593254-x1x 17 17 1 2 CHMIRS HAZNET Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m3d dd-CERS TANK-864890975-aa Andalusia Country Club 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-18-864890975-x1x m3d dd-FINDS/FRS-840042193-aa ANDALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-22-840042193-x1x m3d dd-RIVERSIDE HWG-820094002-aa Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60 La Quinta CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-23-820094002-x1x m3d dd-RIVERSIDE HZH-820089232-aa Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60 La Quinta CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-23-820089232-x1x m3d dd-HAZNET-826784462-aa CORAL OPTION I LLC DBA ANADALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-23-826784462-x1x m4d dd-RIVERSIDE LOP-820083889-aa KSL PGA West Weiskoff/Nicklaus Private 80202 Ave 58 La Quinta CA NW 0.21 / 1,126.93 19 p1p-24-820083889-x1x Site ID | Status Desc: 9914972 | CLOSED/ACTION COMPLETED m4d dd-LUST-820194235-aa KSL PGA WEST WEISKOFF/NICKLAUS 80202 AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA CA 92253 NW 0.21 / 1,126.93 19 p1p-24-820194235-x1x Global ID | Status | Status Date: T0606500977 | Completed - Case Closed | 1999-10-29 00:00:00 18 22 23 23 23 24 24 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 CERS TANK FINDS/FRS RIVERSIDE HWG RIVERSIDE HZH HAZNET RIVERSIDE LOP LUST Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 10 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard State LUST - Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports A search of the LUST database, dated Apr 3, 2018 has found that there are 1 LUST site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key KSL PGA WEST WEISKOFF/NICKLAUS 80202 AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA CA 92253 NW 0.21 / 1,126.93 m-4-820194235-a Global ID | Status | Status Date: T0606500977 | Completed - Case Closed | 1999-10-29 00:00:00 CERS TANK - California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks A search of the CERS TANK database, dated Mar 22, 2018 has found that there are 1 CERS TANK site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key Andalusia Country Club 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-864890975-a County RIVERSIDE LOP - Riverside County Local Oversight Program List A search of the RIVERSIDE LOP database, dated Feb 15, 2018 has found that there are 1 RIVERSIDE LOP site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key KSL PGA West Weiskoff/Nicklaus Private 80202 Ave 58 La Quinta CA NW 0.21 / 1,126.93 m-4-820083889-a Site ID | Status Desc: 9914972 | CLOSED/ACTION COMPLETED Non Standard Federal FINDS/FRS - Facility Registry Service/Facility Index A search of the FINDS/FRS database, dated Apr 17, 2018 has found that there are 1 FINDS/FRS site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key ANDALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-840042193-a 4 3 4 3 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source 11 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key State CHMIRS - California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) A search of the CHMIRS database, dated Jun 19, 2018 has found that there are 1 CHMIRS site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key Riverside Co Fire Behind 58500 Madison Av. La Quinta CA -0.00 / 0.00 m-1-821802190-a HAZNET - Hazardous Waste Manifest Data A search of the HAZNET database, dated Oct 24, 2016 has found that there are 2 HAZNET site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION 59781 MADISON ST LA QUINTA CA 922537656 -0.00 / 0.00 m-2-826593254-a CORAL OPTION I LLC DBA ANADALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-826784462-a County RIVERSIDE HWG - Riverside County Hazardous Waste Generator Sites List A search of the RIVERSIDE HWG database, dated Feb 15, 2018 has found that there are 1 RIVERSIDE HWG site(s) within approximately 0.12 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60 La Quinta CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-820094002-a RIVERSIDE HZH - Riverside County Disclosure Facility List A search of the RIVERSIDE HZH database, dated Feb 15, 2018 has found that there are 1 RIVERSIDE HZH site(s) within approximately 0.12 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60 La Quinta CA 92253 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-820089232-a 1 2 3 3 3 #*#*#*#* m2c m1c m4c(2) m3c(5) L a k e C a h u ill a 116°14'W116°14'30"W116°15'W116°15'30"W116°16'W116°16'30"W116°17'W 33°38'30"N33°38'30"N33°38'N33°38'N33°37'30"N33°37'30"N33°37'N33°37'N33°36'30"N33°36'30"N33°36'N33°36'N0.4 0 0.40.2 Miles Order No: 20180 717212 Map : 1 Mile Radius 1:26700 Address: n/a, La Q uinta, CA Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc . Projec t P roperty Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same E levation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ram ps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation Areas State B rownfield Sites State B rownfield Areas State Superfund Areas :Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas :NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas ) 2 1 4 (2) 3 (5) #*#*#*#* m2c m1c m4c(2) m3c(5) L a k e Ca h u ill a 116°14'30"W116°15'W116°15'30"W116°16'W 33°38'N33°38'N33°37'30"N33°37'30"N33°37'N33°37'N33°36'30"N33°36'30"N0.25 0 0.250.125 Miles Order No: 20180 717212 Map : 0.5 Mile Radius 1:17800 Address: n/a, La Q uinta, CA Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc . Projec t P roperty Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same E levation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ram ps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation Areas State B rownfield Sites State B rownfield Areas State Superfund Areas :Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas :NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas ) 2 1 4 (2) 3 (5) #*#*#*#* m2c m1c m4c(2) m3c(5)Lake CahuillaMadison St5 8 t h A v e H e r m i t a g e Av e n u e 6 0 A r a c e n a 6 0 t h A v e Andalusia MarbellaInterlachenC h antic l eerDr QuarryLnSeminoleDrC a l l e A z u l BlackDiamondC a l l e C o n c h i t a Barristo CirS Valley LnSalida Del SolBarr e l C a c t u s R dSanta Rosa TrlRed Rock RdSanto ThomasDesertRoseDrMi j asArchine LnCoralM o untainCtAloe CirRivieraAngora CtSt on eC re e k Trl W Old Ra n chTrlSCherrywood PlMadison St6 0 t h A v e Madison St6 0 t h A v e 58 t h A v e 116°14'30"W116°15'W116°15'30"W116°16'W 33°37'30"N33°37'30"N33°37'N33°37'N33°36'30"N33°36'30"N0.2 0 0.20.1 Miles Order No: 20180 717212 Map : 0.25 M ile Radius 1:13400 Address: n/a, La Q uinta, CA Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc . Projec t P roperty Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same E levation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ram ps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation Areas State B rownfield Sites State B rownfield Areas State Superfund Areas :Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas :NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas ) 2 1 4 (2) 3 (5) Source: Esri, DigitalGlo be, GeoEye, Earthstar G eographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroG RID, IG N, and the GIS User C ommunity 116°15'W116°15'30"W 33°37'30"N33°37'30"N33°37'N33°37'N0.1 0 0.10.05 Miles Order No: 20180717212Aerial 1:8900 Address: n/a, La Quinta, CA © ERIS In formation Inc.Source: ESRI Wo rld Ima gery (2017) 116°14'W116°14'30"W116°15'W116°15'30"W116°16'W116°16'30"W 33°38'30"N33°38'30"N33°38'N33°38'N33°37'30"N33°37'30"N33°37'N33°37'N33°36'30"N33°36'30"N33°36'N33°36'N0.35 0 0.350.175 Miles Order No: 20180717212Topographic Ma p 1:24000 Address: n/a, La Quinta, CA © ERIS In formation Inc.Sourc e: USG S Topographic Map (2015) Qua drangle(s): Valerie, CA; Martinez Mountain, CA; La Quinta, CA; Indio, CA; 17 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Detail Report Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-1-821802190-b 1 of 1 -0.00 / 0.00 -49.28 / -16 Riverside Co Fire Behind 58500 Madison Av. La Quinta CA dd-CHMIRS-821802190-bb p1p-821802190-y1y ID: 02-5704 Notified Date:10/21/200202:03:50 PM Control No: 02-5704 Notified Date Time: Year: 2002 County:Riverside County California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Contained: Yes Bbls:0 Substance: Drug Lab Waste Cups:0 Incident Date: 10/15/200212:00:00 AM Cuft:0 No of Injuries: 0 Gals:0.000000 No of Fatals: 0 Grams:0 No of Evacs: 0 Lbs:0 Cleanup: Contractor Liters:0 Water: No Oz:0 Water Way: Pts:0 City: La Quinta Qts:0 County: Riverside County Sheen:0 Zip: Tons:0 Site: Road Unknown:0 Admin Agency:Riverside County Environmental Health Location:Behind 58500 Madison Av. Description:Per caller, a construction site unearthed a large dumping area of drug lab waste. m-2-826593254-b 1 of 1 -0.00 / 0.00 -40.13 / -7 RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION 59781 MADISON ST LA QUINTA CA 922537656 dd-HAZNET-826593254-bb p1p-826593254-y1y SIC Code: Mailing City:LA QUINTA NAICS Code: Mailing State:CA EPA ID: CAC002596470 Mailing Zip:922537656 Create Date: 10/13/2005 Region Code:4 Fac Act Ind: No Owner Name:RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION Inact Date: 4/12/2006 Owner Addr 1:59781 MADISON ST County Code: 33 Owner Addr 2: County Name: Riverside Owner City:LA QUINTA Mail Name: Owner State:CA Mailing Addr 1: 59781 MADISON ST Owner Zip:922537656 Mailing Addr 2: Owner Phone:7603997263 Owner Fax: Contact Information ---- Contact Name: BLAKE JUMPER Street Address 1: 59781 MADISON ST Street Address 2: City: LA QUINTA State: CA Zip: 922537656 Phone: 7603997263 ---- ---- Tanner Information ---- 1 2 CHMIRS HAZNET Detail Report 18 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Generator EPA ID: CAC002596470 Generator County Code: 33 Generator County: Riverside TSD EPA ID: AZC950823111 TSD County Code: 99 TSD County: Unknown State Waste Code: 151 State Waste Code Desc.: Asbestos containing waste Method Code: Method Description: Tons: 0.16856 Year: 2005 ---- m-3-864890975-b 1 of 5 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 -33.40 / 0 Andalusia Country Club 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 dd-CERS TANK-864890975-bb p1p-864890975-y1y Site ID:92248 Latitude:33.612785 Longitude:-116.253005 Regulated Programs EI ID:10324504 EI Description:Hazardous Waste Generator EI ID:10324504 EI Description:Chemical Storage Facilities EI ID:10324504 EI Description:Aboveground Petroleum Storage Affiliations Affil Type Desc:Parent Corporation Entity Name:Andalusia Country Club Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc:Primary Emergency Contact Entity Name:William Carrick Entity Title:Golf Course Supnt. Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone:(760) 275-7990 Affil Type Desc:Document Preparer Entity Name:William Carrick Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc:Secondary Emergency Contact 3 CERS TANK 19 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Entity Name:Jerry Hernandez Entity Title:Assistant Supnt. Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone:(760) 469-6381 Affil Type Desc:Identification Signer Entity Name:William Carrick Entity Title:Golf Course Superintendent Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone: Affil Type Desc:Operator Entity Name:William Carrick Entity Title: Address: City: State: Country: Zip Code: Phone:(760) 275-7990 Affil Type Desc:Environmental Contact Entity Name:William Carrick Entity Title: Address:81-120 Avenue 60 City:La Quinta State:CA Country: Zip Code:92253 Phone:(760) 771-9160 Affil Type Desc:Facility Mailing Address Entity Name:Mailing Address Entity Title: Address:81120 Avenue 60 City:La Quinta State:CA Country: Zip Code:92253 Phone: Affil Type Desc:Legal Owner Entity Name:Drummond Corp/William Carrick Entity Title: Address:81120 60th Ave City:La Quinta State:CA Country:United States Zip Code:92253 Phone:(800) 289-2625 Affil Type Desc:CUPA District Entity Name:Riverside Cnty Env Health Entity Title: Address:4065 County Circle Drive, Room 104 City:Riverside State:CA Country: Zip Code:92503 Phone:(951) 358-5055 20 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Coordinates Env Int Type Code:HWG Longitude:-116.253000 Program ID:10324504 Coord Name: Latitude:33.612780 Ref Point Type Desc:Center of a facility or station. Evaluations Eval Date:04-07-2016 Violations Found:No Eval General Type:Compliance Evaluation Inspection Eval Type:Routine done by local agency Eval Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program:APSA Eval Source:CERS Eval Notes: Eval Date:11-04-2013 Violations Found:No Eval General Type:Other/Unknown Eval Type:Other, not routine, done by local agency Eval Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program:HMRRP Eval Source:CERS Eval Notes: Reinspection Eval Date:04-07-2016 Violations Found:Yes Eval General Type:Compliance Evaluation Inspection Eval Type:Routine done by local agency Eval Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program:HMRRP Eval Source:CERS Eval Notes: Eval Date:04-07-2016 Violations Found:No Eval General Type:Compliance Evaluation Inspection Eval Type:Routine done by local agency Eval Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program:HW Eval Source:CERS Eval Notes: Eval Date:09-12-2013 Violations Found:Yes Eval General Type:Compliance Evaluation Inspection Eval Type:Routine done by local agency Eval Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program:HW Eval Source:CERS Eval Notes: Routine inspection Eval Date:09-12-2013 Violations Found:Yes Eval General Type:Compliance Evaluation Inspection Eval Type:Routine done by local agency Eval Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program:HMRRP 21 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Eval Source:CERS Eval Notes: Routine inspection Violations Violation Date:09-12-2013 Violation Program: Violation Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source: Citation:HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 11/04/2013. [LOCAL ORDINANCE VIOLATION 105D] Hazardous materials containers have been labeled properly. Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Operations/Maintenance - General Violations Violation Date:04-07-2016 Violation Program: Violation Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source: Citation:HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 04/26/2016. Owner/operator failed to post NFPA-704 signs. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Owner operator shall research the safety data sheets for chemicals stored onsite and post the appropriate NFPA-704 signs where hazardous materials are stored and at all entrances to the facility. Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violations Violation Date:09-12-2013 Violation Program: Violation Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source: Citation:HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 11/04/2013. [LOCAL ORDINANCE VIOLATION 104A] NFPA 704 sign(s) have been posted appropriately. Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violations Violation Date:09-12-2013 Violation Program: Violation Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source: Citation:HSC 6.5 25250.7 - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5, Section(s) 25250.7 Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 09/12/2013. Violation Description: Failure to handle contaminated used oil (other than minimal amounts of vehicle fuel) as a hazardous waste. Violations 22 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Violation Date:04-07-2016 Violation Program: Violation Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source: Citation:HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 04/26/2016. Owner/operator failed to clearly identify emergency equipment storage locations. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Clearly identify the locations where emergency equipment is stored. Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Operations/Maintenance - General Violations Violation Date:09-12-2013 Violation Program: Violation Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source: Citation:HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 11/04/2013. [LOCAL ORDINANCE VIOLATION 104C] Hazardous materials storage area(s) have been posted appropriately. Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Operations/Maintenance - General Violations Violation Date:09-12-2013 Violation Program: Violation Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source: Citation:22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 09/12/2013. Violation Description: Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containers with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", name and address of the generator, physical and chemical characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation date. Enforcements Enf Action Date:09-12-2013 Enf Action Program:HMRRP Enf Action Type:Notice of Violation (Unified Program)Enf Action Source:CERS Enf Action Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Enf Action Description:Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Enf Action Date:09-12-2013 Enf Action Program:HW Enf Action Type:Notice of Violation (Unified Program)Enf Action Source:CERS Enf Action Division:Riverside County Department of Env Health Enf Action Description:Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: m-3-840042193-b 2 of 5 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 -33.40 / 0 ANDALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 dd-FINDS/FRS-840042193-bb p1p-840042193-y1y Registry ID:110066151354 FIPS Code: Program Acronyms:CA-ENVIROVIEW 3 FINDS/FRS 23 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB HUC Code:18100200 Site Type Name:STATIONARY Location Description: Supplemental Location: Create Date:14-OCT-2015 10:09:12 Update Date: Interest Types:STATE MASTER SIC Codes: SIC Code Descriptions: NAICS Codes: NAICS Code Descriptions: Conveyor:FRS-GEOCODE Federal Facility Code: Federal Agency Name: Tribal Land Code: Tribal Land Name: Congressional Dist No.:45 Census Block Code:060650456054023 EPA Region Code:09 County Name:RIVERSIDE US/Mexico Border Ind: Latitude:33.61274 Longitude:-116.252905 Reference Point:ENTRANCE POINT OF A FACILITY OR STATION Coord Collection Method:ADDRESS MATCHING-HOUSE NUMBER Accuracy Value:50 Datum:NAD83 Source: Facility Detail Rprt URL:http://ofmpub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110066151354 m-3-820094002-b 3 of 5 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 -33.40 / 0 Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60 La Quinta CA 92253 dd-RIVERSIDE HWG-820094002-bb p1p-820094002-y1y m-3-820089232-b 4 of 5 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 -33.40 / 0 Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60 La Quinta CA 92253 dd-RIVERSIDE HZH-820089232-bb p1p-820089232-y1y m-3-826784462-b 5 of 5 SSE 0.01 / 63.73 -33.40 / 0 CORAL OPTION I LLC DBA ANADALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253 dd-HAZNET-826784462-bb p1p-826784462-y1y SIC Code:3429,3519,3599,3714,3799 Mailing City:LA QUINTA NAICS Code:336399 Mailing State:CA EPA ID:CAL000313822 Mailing Zip:922530000 Create Date:11/28/2006 Region Code:4 Fac Act Ind:Yes Owner Name:DRUMMOND CO INC Inact Date:Owner Addr 1:PO BOX 10246 County Code:33 Owner Addr 2: County Name:Riverside Owner City:BIRMINGHAM Mail Name:Owner State:AL Mailing Addr 1:81120 AVE 60 Owner Zip:352020246 Mailing Addr 2:Owner Phone:8002892625 Owner Fax:2059456557 Contact Information ---- Contact Name: WILLIAM CARRICK GOLF SUPT Street Address 1: 81-570 CARBONERAS Street Address 2: 3 3 3 RIVERSIDE HWG RIVERSIDE HZH HAZNET 24 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB City: LA QUINTA State: CA Zip: 92253 Phone: 7607719160 ---- m-4-820083889-b 1 of 2 NW 0.21 / 1,126.93 -14.76 / 19 KSL PGA West Weiskoff/Nicklaus Private 80202 Ave 58 La Quinta CA dd-RIVERSIDE LOP-820083889-bb p1p-820083889-y1y Site ID:9914972 Closed Code:Y Status Code:9 Closed Desc:CLOSED SITE Status Desc:CLOSED/ACTION COMPLETED Employee:Shurlow-LOP Case Type Code:S Case Type Desc:SOIL ONLY IS IMPACTED m-4-820194235-b 2 of 2 NW 0.21 / 1,126.93 -14.76 / 19 KSL PGA WEST WEISKOFF/NICKLAUS 80202 AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA CA 92253 dd-LUST-820194235-bb p1p-820194235-y1y Global ID:T0606500977 CUF Case:NO Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Begin Date:1998-11-23 00:00:00 Status:Completed - Case Closed How Discovered:Other Means Status Date:1999-10-29 00:00:00 Stop Method:Close and Remove Tank RB Case No:7T2253011 County:Riverside LOC Case No:9914972 Latitude:33.6281886772241 Lead Agency:RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOP Longitude:-116.264376180391 Case Worker:RIV File Location:Local Agency Warehouse Local Agency:RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOP Potential Media Of Concern:Gasoline Potential Media Affected:Soil How Discovered Description: Stop Description: Cal Water Watershed Name:Whitewater - Coachella - Indio (719.47) DWR Groundwater Subbasin Name: Coachella Valley - Indio (7-21.01) Site History: Status History Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1998-11-23 00:00:00 Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1999-10-29 00:00:00 Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1999-03-02 00:00:00 Activities Action Type:Other Action:Leak Stopped Date:1998-11-23 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Closure/No Further Action Letter - #RCDEH1029 Date:1999-10-29 00:00:00 Action Type:Other Action:Leak Reported Date:1999-03-02 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT 4 4 RIVERSIDE LOP LUST 25 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Action:File review - #RCDEH Upload Site File 8/26/2015 Date:1999-10-28 00:00:00 Action Type:Other Action:Leak Discovery Date:1999-03-02 00:00:00 Contacts Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker City:PALM DESERT Contact Name:Phan Le Email:phan.le@waterboards.ca.gov Organization Name:COLORADO RIVER BASIN RWQCB (REGION 7) Phone No:7607768974 Address:73720 FRED WARING DRIVE SUITE #100 Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker City:RIVERSIDE Contact Name:Riverside County LOP Email: Organization Name:RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOP Phone No:9519558980 Address:3880 LEMON ST SUITE 200 26 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Unplottable Summary Total: 11 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Name Address City Zip ERIS ID uu-CDL-820128393-aa 62ND AVE (DIRT ROAD) THERMAL CA 92274 820128393 uu-CDL-820127712-aa FOUND @ FREDA & MADISON STREETS RIVERSIDE CA 92503 820127712 uu-CLEANUP SITES-820165142-aa BRINE FAC, LAYTON POND Madison Street and Lenox Ave RIVERSIDE CA 92504 820165142 uu-EMISSIONS-861245679-aa COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST AVENUE 38 E MADISON INDIO CA 92236 861245679 uu-HHSS-822935508-aa PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA 92274 822935508 uu-HHSS-822949830-aa PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA 92274 822949830 uu-HIST TANK-865061935-aa PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA 865061935 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084974-aa CVWD Well Site #6729-1 Madison at Taylor Country St La Quinta CA 92253 820084974 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820086422-aa Ave #42 Substation Ave 42 w/o Madison St Indio CA 92201 820086422 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084689-aa CVWD Booster Station #06730 Ave 58 & QuarryLn La Quinta CA 92253 820084689 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084671-aa Avenue #58 Substation Ave 58 1/4 mi w/o La Quinta CA 92253 820084671 CDL CDL CLEANUP SITES EMISSIONS HHSS HHSS HIST TANK RIVERSIDE HZH RIVERSIDE HZH RIVERSIDE HZH RIVERSIDE HZH Unplottable Summary 27 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Unplottable Report Site: 62ND AVE (DIRT ROAD) THERMAL CA 92274 uu-CDL-820128393-bb Clue:1997-02-150 Date:2/27/1997 County:RIVERSIDE Lab Type:A Lab Type Description:Abandoned Drug Lab Waste - location away from an actual illegal drug lab where drug lab waste and/or equipment were abandoned. Site: FOUND @ FREDA & MADISON STREETS RIVERSIDE CA 92503 uu-CDL-820127712-bb Clue:1998-12-036 Date:12/8/1998 County:RIVERSIDE Lab Type:M Lab Type Description:Mobile Lab - location where illegal drug lab equipment and materials were found in a vehicle or other mode of transport. Site:BRINE FAC, LAYTON POND Madison Street and Lenox Ave RIVERSIDE CA 92504 uu-CLEANUP SITES-820165142-bb Global ID: L10008444825 CUF Case:NO Case Type: Land Disposal Site Begin Date: Status: Open - Inactive How Discovered: Status Date: 2014-11-04 00:00:00 Stop Method: RB Case No: 8 330117001 County:Riverside LOC Case No: Latitude:33.9212748561894 Lead Agency: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Longitude:-117.391480207443 Case Worker: KDP File Location:Regional Board Local Agency: Potential Cntm of Concrn: Potential Media Affected: How Discovered Description: Stop Description: Cal Water Watershed Name:Santa Ana River - Middle Santa Ana River - Arlington (801.26) DWR Groundwater Subbasin Name: Upper Santa Ana Valley - Riverside-Arlington (8-2.03) Site History: Layton Brine Pond Site Summary - It is a brine disposal pond located about half a mile southeast of the Victoria Ave. and Madison St. intersection in Riverside and is located within the Arlington Groundwater Basin -The pond is rectangular and measures approximately 250 feet by 150 feet - Layton Soft Water, Inc leases the property from Union Pacific, and disposed of the brine that was a by-product of operations -Brine consisted primarily of sodium chloride (NaCl) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) -Disposal of brine has ceased since June 1, 1989 -The geological setting of the site is characterized as silty and coarse sand alluvium, overlaying granite bedrock -Since the site located in an abandoned granite quarry, the RWQCB has found that the brine pond is impermeable and has no signs of leakage or that groundwater is being impacted -Cornerstone completed a Groundwater Monitoring Investigation in early 2009 that concurs with the findings made by the RWQCB -According to RWQCB Order No. 81-74, the pond was found to be impermeable and bi-annual monitoring was to be implemented -March 8, 1990, RWQCB wrote a letter stating that if site remained closed, there would be no objection to letting the remaining brine solution evaporate -due to seasonal rain fall, this has not proven very effective Closure Plan -Move surrounding soil (previously from the rock quarry), back into the brine pond -Cover the existing liquid in the pond with 2 to 3 feet of dirt, allowing adsorption -Following a period for adsorption to take place, more soil will be move to the pond, increasing the coverage level to 4 to 5 feet, allowing natural vegetation -Closure Work Plan submitted back in 2009 mention the soil would be compacted to 90% relative compaction. No mention of compaction was made in the latest submittal. Clarification is needed -In the event that there is not enough soil in the surrounding area, soil approved by the RWQCB will be brought in Contingencies -Closure is dependent on approval of: -Action plan by the RWQCB -Permit from City of Riverside and complete release of liability with the closing of the conditional use permit under which Layton has operated under -Termination of lease with Southern Pacific Railroad and release of liability for any and all circumstances regarding any relationship with them &#8195; CDL CDL CLEANUP SITES Unplottable Report 28 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Status History Status: Open - Inactive Status Date:2010-07-01 00:00:00 Status: Open - Inactive Status Date:2014-11-04 00:00:00 Activities Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Monitoring Report - Other Date:1990-01-25 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling Date:2017-11-22 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Monitoring Report - Other Date:2017-12-14 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling Date:2017-03-13 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #81-74 Date:2017-03-14 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Correspondence Date:2010-09-03 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Waste Discharge Requirements Date:1981-04-10 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Other Report / Document Date:2015-12-15 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Closure Plan Date:2009-05-11 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #81-74 Date:2017-03-20 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Closure Plan Date:2014-06-05 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Other Report / Document Date:2016-12-05 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Monitoring Report - Other Date:2017-06-15 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Monitoring Report - Other Date:2003-02-06 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #81-74 Date:2017-03-15 00:00:00 29 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Staff Letter Date:2010-10-12 00:00:00 Action Type:RESPONSE Action:Correspondence Date:2015-12-14 00:00:00 Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Action:Staff Letter Date:2014-06-25 00:00:00 Contacts Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker City:RIVERSIDE Contact Name: KEITH PERSON Email:keith.person@waterboards.ca.gov Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Phone No: Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 Site:COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST AVENUE 38 E MADISON INDIO CA 92236 uu-EMISSIONS-861245679-bb 1996 Toxic Data Facility ID: 17818 COID:RIV Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN:SOUTH COAST AQMD CO: 33 CHAPIS: Air Basin: SS CERR Code: District: SC TS: Health Risk Asmt: Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind: Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind: 1997 Toxic Data Facility ID: 17818 COID:RIV Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN:SOUTH COAST AQMD CO: 33 CHAPIS: Air Basin: SS CERR Code: District: SC TS: Health Risk Asmt: Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind: Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind: 1998 Toxic Data Facility ID: 17818 COID:RIV Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN:SOUTH COAST AQMD CO: 33 CHAPIS: Air Basin: SS CERR Code: District: SC TS: Health Risk Asmt: Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind: Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind: 1999 Toxic Data Facility ID: 17818 COID:RIV Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN:SOUTH COAST AQMD CO: 33 CHAPIS: Air Basin: SS CERR Code: District: SC EMISSIONS 30 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 TS: Health Risk Asmt: Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind: Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind: 2000 Toxic Data Facility ID: 17818 COID:RIV Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN:SOUTH COAST AQMD CO: 33 CHAPIS: Air Basin: SS CERR Code: District: SC TS: Health Risk Asmt: Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind: Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind: 2001 Toxic Data Facility ID: 17818 COID:RIV Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN:SOUTH COAST AQMD CO: 33 CHAPIS: Air Basin: SS CERR Code: District: SC TS: Health Risk Asmt: Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind: Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind: Site:PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA 92274 uu-HHSS-822935508-bb County:Imperial Pdf File Url:http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0001f49d.pdf Site:PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA 92274 uu-HHSS-822949830-bb County:Riverside Pdf File Url:http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0001f49d.pdf Site:PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA uu-HIST TANK-865061935-bb Owner Name: CARDINAL DISTRIBUTING CO No of Containers:1 Owner Street: 85-810 GRAPEFRUIT BLVD.County:RIVERSIDE Owner City: COACHELLA Facility State:CA Owner State: CA Facility Zip:92274 Owner Zip: 92236 Site:CVWD Well Site #6729-1 Madison at Taylor Country St La Quinta CA 92253 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084974-bb Site:Ave #42 Substation Ave 42 w/o Madison St Indio CA 92201 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820086422-bb Site:CVWD Booster Station #06730 HHSS HHSS HIST TANK RIVERSIDE HZH RIVERSIDE HZH 31 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Ave 58 & QuarryLn La Quinta CA 92253 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084689-bb Site:Avenue #58 Substation Ave 58 1/4 mi w/o La Quinta CA 92253 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084671-bb RIVERSIDE HZH RIVERSIDE HZH 32 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List:rr-NPL-bb National Priorities List (Superfund)-NPL: EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency) list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Government Publication Date: Feb 6, 2018 National Priority List - Proposed:rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb Includes sites proposed (by the EPA, the state, or concerned citizens) for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Government Publication Date: Feb 6, 2018 Deleted NPL:rr-DELETED NPL-bb The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Government Publication Date: Feb 6, 2018 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory:rr-SEMS-bb The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2018 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985:rr-ODI-bb The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites:rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb The Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2018 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS ODI SEMS ARCHIVE Appendix: Database Descriptions 33 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS: rr-CERCLIS-bb Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands:rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned:rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens:rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action:rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities:rr-RCRA TSD-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018 RCRA Generator List:rr-RCRA LQG-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA SQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018 CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG 34 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA CESQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018 RCRA Non-Generators:rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs:rr-FED ENG-bb Engineering controls (ECs) encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs:rr-FED INST-bb Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency ) expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 8, 2017 The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database:rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 20, 2018 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing:rr-FEMA UST-bb The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 RCRA CESQG RCRA NON GEN FED ENG FED INST ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST 35 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 LIEN on Property:rr-SEMS LIEN-bb The EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides LIEN information on properties under the EPA Superfund Program. Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2018 Superfund Decision Documents:rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2018 State State Response Sites:rr-RESPONSE-bb A list of identified confirmed release sites where the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. This database is state equivalent NPL. Government Publication Date: Apr 18, 2018 EnviroStor Database:rr-ENVIROSTOR-bb The EnviroStor Data Management System is made available by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Includes Corrective Action sites, Tiered Permit sites, Historical Sites and Evaluation/Investigation sites. This database is state equivalent CERCLIS. Government Publication Date: Feb 26, 2018 Delisted State Response Sites:rr-DELISTED ENVS-bb Sites removed from the list of State Response Sites made available by the EnviroStor Data Management System, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Government Publication Date: Apr 18, 2018 Solid Waste Information System (SWIS):rr-SWF/LF-bb The Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database made available by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) contains information on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the State of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites. Government Publication Date: May 7, 2018 EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities:rr-HWP-bb A list of hazardous waste facilities including permitted, post-closure and historical facilities found in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database. Government Publication Date: May 31, 2018 Land Disposal Sites:rr-LDS-bb Land Disposal Sites in GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s data management system. The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Waste management units include waste piles, surface impoundments, and landfills. Government Publication Date: Dec 04, 2017 Sites Listed in the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program Report:rr-SWAT-bb In a 1993 Memorandum of Understanding, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) agreed to submit a comprehensive report on the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). This report summarizes the work completed to date on the SWAT Program, and addresses both the impacts that leakage from solid waste disposal sites (SWDS) may have upon waters of the State and the actions taken to address such leakage. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1995 Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports:rr-LUST-bb List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks within the Cleanup Sites data in GeoTracker database. GeoTracker is the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) data management system for managing sites that impact groundwater, especially those that require groundwater cleanup (Underground Storage Tanks, Department of Defense and Site Cleanup Program) as well as permitted facilities such as operating Underground Storage Tanks. The Leak Prevention Program that overlooks LUST sites is the SWRCB in California's Environmental Protection Agency. SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD RESPONSE ENVIROSTOR DELISTED ENVS SWF/LF HWP LDS SWAT LUST 36 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2018 Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED LST-bb List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) cleanup sites removed from GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s database system, as well as sites removed from the SWRCB's list of UST Case closures. Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2018 Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) in GeoTracker:rr-UST-bb List of Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Mar 11, 2018 Solid Waste Disposal Sites with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels:rr-SWRCB SWF-bb This is a list of solid waste disposal sites identified by California State Water Resources Control Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit. Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2006 Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank Cases:rr-UST CLOSURE-bb List of UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the California Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director that have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2018 Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database:rr-HHSS-bb The Historical Hazardous Substance Storage database contains information collected in the 1980s from facilities that stored hazardous substances. The information was originally collected on paper forms, was later transferred to microfiche, and recently indexed as a searchable database. When using this database, please be aware that it is based upon self-reported information submitted by facilities which has not been independently verified. It is unlikely that every facility responded to the survey and the database should not be expected to be a complete inventory of all facilities that were operating at that time. This database is maintained by the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Geotracker. Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2015 Aboveground Storage Tanks:rr-AST-bb A statewide list from 2009 of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) made available by the Cal FIRE Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM). This list is no longer maintained or updated by the Cal FIRE OSFM. Government Publication Date: Aug 31, 2009 Delisted Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED TNK-bb This database contains a list of storage tank sites that were removed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Cal FIRE Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM). Government Publication Date: Mar 11, 2018 California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks:rr-CERS TANK-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials. Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2018 Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Land Use Restrictions:rr-LUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents land use restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple land use restrictions. Government Publication Date: Apr 18, 2018 Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restrictions:rr-HLUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. DELISTED LST UST SWRCB SWF UST CLOSURE HHSS AST DELISTED TNK CERS TANK LUR HLUR 37 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Government Publication Date: Feb 18, 2018 Deed Restrictions and Land Use Restrictions:rr-DEED-bb List of Deed Restrictions, Land Use Restrictions and Covenants in GeoTracker made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency. A deed restriction (land use covenant) may be required to facilitate the remediation of past environmental contamination and to protect human health and the environment by reducing the risk of exposure to residual hazardous materials. Government Publication Date: Jan 11, 2018 Voluntary Cleanup Program:rr-VCP-bb List of sites in the Voluntary Cleanup Program made available by the Department of Toxic Substances and Control (DTSC). The Voluntary Cleanup Program was designed to respond to lower priority sites. Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, DTSC enters site-specific agreements with project proponents for DTSC oversight of site assessment, investigation, and/or removal or remediation activities, and the project proponents agree to pay DTSC's reasonable costs for those services. Government Publication Date: Feb 26, 2018 GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data:rr-CLEANUP SITES-bb A list of cleanup sites in the state of California made available by The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). SWRCB tracks leaking underground storage tank cleanups as well as other water board cleanups. Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2018 Delisted California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks:rr-DELISTED CTNK-bb This database contains a list of Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank sites that were removed from in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal. Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2018 Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Container Information - Facility Summary:rr-HIST TANK-bb The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Hazardous Substance Storage Containers listing and inventory in th 1980s. This facility summary lists historic tank sites where the following container types were present: farm motor vehicle fuel tanks; waste tanks; sumps; pits, ponds, lagoons, and others; and all other product tanks. This set, published in May 1988, lists facility and owner information, as well as the number of containers. This data is historic and will not be updated. Government Publication Date: May 27, 1988 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN LUST-bb LUSTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN UST-bb USTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED ILST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 14, 2017 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED IUST-bb Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 14, 2017 County Delisted County Records:rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb Records removed from county or CUPA databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds. DEED VCP CLEANUP SITES DELISTED CTNK HIST TANK INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST DELISTED COUNTY 38 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Government Publication Date: May 30, 2018 Kern County AST List:rr-KERN AST-bb A list of aboveground storage tanks in the county of Kern. This list is made available by Kern County Public Health Services Department. Government Publication Date: Jun 15, 2018 Riverside County Local Oversight Program List:rr-RIVERSIDE LOP-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities in Riverside County. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. Environmental Cleanup Program provides oversight of assessments and cleanups at properties that have been, or may have been, contaminated with hazardous substances from LUSTs or releases associated with other commercial/industrial use. Government Publication Date: Feb 15, 2018 Riverside County Underground Storage Tanks List:rr-UST RIVERSIDE-bb A list of registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites in Riverside County. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. The Hazardous Materials Management Branch (HMMB) regulates and oversees the inspections of constructions, repairs, upgrades, system operation and removal of UST systems. Government Publication Date: Feb 15, 2018 Santa Clara County - Sunnyvale City CUPA List:rr-SUNNYVALE CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Sunnyvale City, Santa Clara County. This list is made available by the Fire Prevention & Hazardous Materials division of the Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety. Government Publication Date: Jun 14, 2018 Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal Facility Registry Service/Facility Index:rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Facility Registry System (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. Government Publication Date: Apr 17, 2018 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program:rr-TRIS-bb The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2016 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System:rr-HMIRS-bb US DOT - Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation. Government Publication Date: Sep 11, 2017 National Clandestine Drug Labs:rr-NCDL-bb The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: Dec 21, 2017 Toxic Substances Control Act:rr-TSCA-bb KERN AST RIVERSIDE LOP UST RIVERSIDE SUNNYVALE CUPA FINDS/FRS TRIS HMIRS NCDL TSCA 39 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2017 Hist TSCA:rr-HIST TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing:rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing:rr-FTTS INSP-bb An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List:rr-PRP-bb Early in the cleanup process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties (PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. Government Publication Date: Oct 10, 2017 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing:rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS):rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance (FE&C) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities. These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement. The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits, limits, discharge monitoring data and other program reports. Government Publication Date: Nov 18, 2016 Drycleaner Facilities:rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner facilities from the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016 Delisted Drycleaner Facilities:rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016 HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY 40 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Formerly Used Defense Sites:rr-FUDS-bb Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. This list is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Government Publication Date: Nov 22, 2016 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS):rr-MLTS-bb A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2017 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites:rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File:rr-MINES-bb The Master Index File (MIF) contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself. Government Publication Date: Jul 31, 2017 Alternative Fueling Stations:rr-ALT FUELS-bb List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Propane) stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations, and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) obtains information about new stations from trade media, Clean Cities coordinators, a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website, and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and industry groups. Government Publication Date: Apr 25, 2018 Registered Pesticide Establishments:rr-SSTS-bb List of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide-producing and device-producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides, active ingredients, or devices be registered. The list of establishments is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Mar 1, 2018 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers:rr-PCB-bb Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date: Nov 30, 2017 State EnviroStor Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement:rr-INSP COMP ENF-bb A list of permitted facilities with inspections and enforcements tracked in the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) EnviroStor. Government Publication Date: May 28, 2018 Clandestine Drug Lab Sites:rr-CDL-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a listing of drug lab sites. DTSC is responsible for removal and disposal of hazardous substances discovered by law enforcement officials while investigating illegal/clandestine drug laboratories. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 School Property Evaluation Program Sites:rr-SCH-bb FUDS MLTS HIST MLTS MINES ALT FUELS SSTS PCB INSP COMP ENF CDL SCH 41 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 A list of sites registered with The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) School Property Evaluation and Cleanup (SPEC) Division. SPEC is responsible for assessing, investigating and cleaning up proposed school sites. The Division ensures that selected properties are free of contamination or, if the properties were previously contaminated, that they have been cleaned up to a level that protects the students and staff who will occupy the new school. Government Publication Date: Feb 26, 2018 California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS):rr-CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS). This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES). Government Publication Date: Jun 19, 2018 Hazardous Waste Manifest Data:rr-HAZNET-bb A list of hazardous waste manifests received each year by Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments. Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2016 Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup:rr-HWSS CLEANUP-bb The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. This list is published by California Department of Toxic Substance Control. Government Publication Date: Feb 1, 2018 List of Hazardous Waste Facilities Subject to Corrective Action:rr-DTSC HWF-bb This is a list of hazardous waste facilities identified in Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 25187.5. These facilities are those where Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has taken or contracted for corrective action because a facility owner/operator has failed to comply with a date for taking corrective action in an order issued under HSC § 25187, or because DTSC determined that immediate corrective action was necessary to abate an imminent or substantial endangerment. Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016 Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data:rr-HIST MANIFEST-bb A list of historic hazardous waste manifests received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) from year the 1980 to 1992. The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1992 Historical California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS):rr-HIST CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) prior to 1993. This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES). Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1993 Historical Cortese List:rr-HIST CORTESE-bb List of sites which were once included on the Cortese list. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements for providing information about the location of hazardous sites. Government Publication Date: Nov 13, 2008 Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders:rr-CDO/CAO-bb The California Environment Protection Agency "Cortese List" of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO). This list contains many CDOs and CAOs that do NOT concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. Many of the listed orders concern, as examples, discharges of domestic sewage, food processing wastes, or sediment that do not contain hazardous materials, but the Water Boards' database does not distinguish between these types of orders. Government Publication Date: Feb 16, 2012 Delisted Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites:rr-DELISTED HAZ-bb This database contains a list of sites that were removed from the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) in the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2018 CHMIRS HAZNET HWSS CLEANUP DTSC HWF HIST MANIFEST HIST CHMIRS HIST CORTESE CDO/CAO DELISTED HAZ 42 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Drycleaner Facilities:rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial, linen supply, commercial laundry, dry cleaning and pressing machines - Coin Operated Laundry and Dry Cleaning. This is provided by the Department of Toxic Substance Control. Government Publication Date: Jun 21, 2018 Delisted Drycleaners:rr-DELISTED DRYC-bb Sites removed from the list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers, made available by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. Government Publication Date: Jun 21, 2018 Waste Discharge Requirements:rr-WASTE DISCHG-bb List of sites in California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program in California, made available by the SWRCB via GeoTracker. The WDR program regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. Government Publication Date: May 30, 2018 Toxic Pollutant Emissions Facilities:rr-EMISSIONS-bb A list of criteria and toxic pollutant emissions data for facilities in California made available by the California Environmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board (ARB). Risk data may be based on previous inventory submittals. The toxics data are submitted to the ARB by the local air districts as requirement of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program. This program requires emission inventory updates every four years. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2015 California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites:rr-CERS HAZ-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials. Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2018 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County Riverside County Hazardous Waste Generator Sites List:rr-RIVERSIDE HWG-bb A list of Hazardous Waste Generator Sites in the County of Riverside. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Feb 15, 2018 Riverside County Disclosure Facility List:rr-RIVERSIDE HZH-bb A list of facilities disclosed to Riverside County Department of Environmental Health (DEH). This list is made available by Riverside County DEH which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. A business is required to establish and submit a Business Plan if the facility handles hazardous material equal to or greater than 55 gallons, 500 pounds or 200 cubic feet at any time during the year. Government Publication Date: Feb 15, 2018 DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYC WASTE DISCHG EMISSIONS CERS HAZ RIVERSIDE HWG RIVERSIDE HZH 43 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Definitions Database Descriptions:This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including:source,information available,time coverage,and acronyms used.They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report:This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record.Records are summarized by location,starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance:The distance value is the distance between plotted points,not necessarily the distance between the sites'boundaries.All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation:The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted.All values are an approximation. Source:Google Elevation API. Executive Summary:This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'-Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and,within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'-This section lists all the records which fall on the project property.For more details,see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'-This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties,listing them in order of proximity from the project property.For more details,see the 'Detail Report'section. Map Key:The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property.Map Key numbers always start at #1.The project property will always have a map key of '1'if records are available.If there is a number in brackets beside the main number,this will indicate the number of records on that specific property.If there is no number in brackets,there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation':the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation',the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation'and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons,including limited geographic information.These records may or may not be in your study area,and are included as reference. Definitions EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Appendix D    Additional Documentation   ¾ __________________ _________________________________ APN(s) Riverside County Parcel Report MAPS/IMAGES 766070003, 766070006, 766070012, 764200076, 764210007, 764210029, 764210028, 766080004, 766080005, 766080001, 766080002 PARCEL Previous APN APN Owners Not Available Online 764200076764-200-076-0 764210007764-210-007-9 764210028764-210-028-8 764210029764-210-029-9 766070003766-070-003-7 766070006766-070-006-0 766070012766-070-012-5 766080001766-080-001-6 766080002766-080-002-7 766080004766-080-004-9 766080005766-080-005-0 764-200-013 764-210-001 764-210-009 764-210-009 000-000-000 000-000-000 766-070-005 000-000-000 000-000-000 000-000-000 000-000-000 Address NOT AVAILABLE 764-200-076 NOT AVAILABLE 764-210-007 NOT AVAILABLE 764-210-028 NOT AVAILABLE 764-210-029 NOT AVAILABLE 766-070-003 NOT AVAILABLE 766-070-006 NOT AVAILABLE 766-070-012 NOT AVAILABLE 766-080-001 NOT AVAILABLE 766-080-002 NOT AVAILABLE 766-080-004 Page 1 of 8 on 7/18/2018 3:15:35 PM Legal Description Mailing Address NOT AVAILABLE 766-080-005 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 764-200-076 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 764-210-007 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 764-210-028 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 764-210-029 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 766-070-003 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 766-070-006 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 766-070-012 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 766-080-001 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 766-080-002 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 766-080-004 81570 CARBONERAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 766-080-005 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 764-200-076 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 764-210-007 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 764-210-028 0 Lot Size Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 764-210-029 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 766-070-003 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 766-070-006 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 766-070-012 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 766-080-001 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 766-080-002 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 766-080-004 0 Subdivision Name: Recorded Book/Page: Lot/Parcel: Tract Number: Block: 766-080-005 0 Recorded lot size is 17.26 acres 764-200-076 Recorded lot size is 16.95 acres 764-210-007 Recorded lot size is 0.5 acres 764-210-028 Recorded lot size is 0.1 acres 764-210-029 Page 2 of 8 on 7/18/2018 3:15:35 PM Property Characteristics Recorded lot size is 45 acres 766-070-003 Recorded lot size is 101.65 acres 766-070-006 Recorded lot size is 29.54 acres 766-070-012 Recorded lot size is 20.08 acres 766-080-001 Recorded lot size is 20.08 acres 766-080-002 Recorded lot size is 79.09 acres 766-080-004 Recorded lot size is 37.37 acres 766-080-005 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:YES Central Cool:YES Central Heat:YES 764-200-076 0000 0 0 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 0 UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:NO Central Cool:NO Central Heat:NO 764-210-007 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:YES Central Cool:YES Central Heat:YES 764-210-028 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Year Constructed: 764-210-029 UNKNOWN Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Pool:YES Central Cool:YES Central Heat:YES 0000 0 0 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 0 UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:NO Central Cool:NO Central Heat:NO 766-070-003 0000 0 0 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 0 UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:NO Central Cool:NO Central Heat:NO 766-070-006 0000 0 0 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 0 UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:NO Central Cool:NO Central Heat:NO 766-070-012 0000 0 0 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 0 UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:NO Central Cool:NO Central Heat:NO 766-080-001 0000 0 0 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Year Constructed: 766-080-002 Page 3 of 8 on 7/18/2018 3:15:35 PM Supervisorial District Township/Range Thomas Bros. Maps Page/Grid Elevation Range (ft.) City Boundary Annexation Date LAFCO Case City Spheres of Influence Indian Tribal Land 0 UNKNOWN Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Pool:NO Central Cool:NO Central Heat:NO 0000 0 0 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 0 UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:NO Central Cool:NO Central Heat:NO 766-080-004 0000 0 0 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 0 UNKNOWN Number of Baths: Number of Bedrooms: Construction Type: Garage Type: Property Area (sq ft): Roof Type: Number of Stories: Year Constructed: Pool:NO Central Cool:NO Central Heat:NO 766-080-005 V MANUEL PEREZ, DISTRICT 4 T6SR7E SEC 27 SW T6SR7E SEC 28 SW T6SR7E SEC 27 NW T6SR7E SEC 28 SE T6SR7E SEC 28 NW T6SR7E SEC 28 NE -56 - 160 Page: 5530 GRID: C6 Page: 5530 GRID: D7 Page: 5530 GRID: B7 Page: 5530 GRID: C7 Page: 5590 GRID: C2 Page: 5590 GRID: D1 Page: 5590 GRID: B1 Page: 5590 GRID: C1 Not in a Tribal Land LA QUINTA Not in a city sphere 6/26/2002 12:00:00 AM 8/13/2002 12:00:00 AM 2001-35-4 PLANNING more... ENVIRONMENTAL more... Airport Compatibility Zones General Plan Policy Areas Agricultural Preserve Area Plan (RCIP) Community Advisory Councils Zoning Classifications (ORD. 348) Land Use Designations General Plan Policy Overlays Zoning Overlays Airport Influence Areas Specific Plans Zoning Districts/Areas Historical Preservation Districts CVMSHCP (Coachella Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan) Plan Area CVMSHCP Fluvial Sand Transport Special Provision Areas March Joint Powers Authority Proposals County Service Area Residential Permit Statistics CVMSHCP (Coachella Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan) Conservation Area 2002-4-4 N/A Not in the jurisdiction of the March Joint Powers Authority Not in a County Service Area Not in a Specific Plan CITY Not in a General Plan Policy Area Western Coachella Valley Not in a General Plan Policy Area Contact the city for more information Zoning:CZ Number: Not in a Zoning Overlay Not in a Historical Preservation District Not in an Agricultural Preserve NOT IN AN AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA NOT IN AN AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY ZONE Not in a Zone District/Area Not in a Community Advisory Council Final Expected Units: BRS Permit Units: Current Permits: % of Expected: Cumulative Total: N/A Issued Active COACHELLA VALLEY NOT COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION NOT IN A FLUVIAL SAND TRANSPORT Page 4 of 8 on 7/18/2018 3:15:35 PM FIRE DEVELOPMENT FEES Vegetation (2005) Provision Areas WRMSHCP (Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan) Plan Area WRMSHCP (Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan) Cell Group WRMSHCP Cell Number Fire Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Classification (Ord. 787) CVMSHCP (Coachella Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan) Fee Area (Ord 875) Western TUMF (Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Ord. 824) Road & Bridge Benefit District Eastern TUMF (Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Ord. 673) DIF (Development Impact Fee Area Ord. 659) SKR Fee Area (Stephen’s Kagaroo Rat Ord. 663.10) WRMSHCP (Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan) Fee Area (Ord 810) HANS/ERP (Habitat Acquisition and Negotiation Strategy/Expedited Review Process) Not in the Western Riverside County MSHCP Fee Area Not in a Cell Group Not in a Cell Number N/AProject: Notes: Status: LMS Case: Intake Num: Conserve: No Vegetation Not in a Fire Hazard Zone Not in a Fire Responsibility Area COACHELLA VALLEY Not in the Western Riverside County MSHCP Fee Area Not in the Western TUMF Fee Area IN OR PARTIALLY WITHIN A TUMF FEE AREA. NOT IN AN ROAD/BRIDGE BENEFIT DISTRICT WESTERN COACHELLA VALLEY, AREA 2 Not in the SKR Fee Area GEOLOGIC HYDROLOGY TRANSPORTATION more... Development Agreements Transportation Agreements CETAP (Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process) Corridors Circulation Element Ultimate Right-of-Way Road Book Page Flood Control District Flood Plain Review Water District Watershed Fault Zone Liquefaction Potential Subsidence Paleontological Sensitivity Faults Agreement # 42 Amendment # Expiration Date Line IN OR PARTIALLY WITHIN A CIRCULATION 222 Contract Number: Not in a Trans Agreement Not in a CETAP Corridor *MAYBE REQUIRED, CONTACT OUTSIDE FLOODPLAIN, REVIEW NOT COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WHITEWATER COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT NOT IN A FAULT ZONE NOT IN A FAULT LINE High Low Moderate Active Susceptible HIGH SENSITIVITY (HIGH A): BASED ON GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS OR MAPPABLE ROCK UNITS THAT ARE ROCKS THAT CONTAIN FOSSILIZED BODY ELEMENTS, AND TRACE FOSSILS SUCH AS TRACKS, NESTS AND EGGS. THESE FOSSILS OCCUR ON OR BELOW THE SURFACE LOW POTENTIAL (L): FOLLOWING A LITERATURE SEARCH, RECORDS CHECK AND A FIELD SURVEY, AREAS MAY BE DETERMINED BY A QUALIFIED VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGIST AS HAVING LOW POTENTIAL FOR CONTAINING SIGNIFICANT PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES SUBJECT TO ADVERSE IMPACTS. UNDETERMINED POTENTIAL (U): AREAS UNDERLAIN BY SEDIMENTARY ROCKS FOR WHICH LITERATURE AND UNPUBLISHED STUDIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE HAVE UNDETERMINED POTENTIAL FOR CONTAINING SIGNIFICANT PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. THESE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED BY A FIELD SURVEY CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGIST. Page 5 of 8 on 7/18/2018 3:15:35 PM MISCELLANEOUS School Districts Farmland Lighting (Ord. 655) Communities 2010 Census Tract Tax Rate Area & District Name Special Notes CONTAINING SIGNIFICANT PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. THESE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED BY A FIELD SURVEY CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGIST. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED Not in a community Zone: B 456.05 456.08 LOCAL IMPORTANCE OTHER LANDS OTHER LANDS PLEASE REFER TO ORDINANCE 457.96 FOR WITHIN IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT UTILITY 020148 - CITRUS PEST CONTROL 2 020148 - CITY OF LA QUINTA 020148 - CO FREE LIBRARY 020148 - CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION 020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT BLO HS 020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY PUBLIC 020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY REC & PK 020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY RESOURCE 020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED 020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 020148 - CSA 152 020148 - CV MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL 020148 - CVWD STORM WATER UNIT 020148 - DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 020148 - GENERAL 020148 - GENERAL PURPOSE 020148 - LA QUINTA NO-LOW 020148 - RDV PROJ 4-THERMAL 020148 - RIV CO REGIONAL PARK & OPEN SP 020148 - RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION 020149 - CITRUS PEST CONTROL 2 020149 - CITY OF LA QUINTA 020149 - CO FREE LIBRARY 020149 - CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION 020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT BLO HS 020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY PUBLIC 020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY REC & PK 020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY RESOURCE 020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED 020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 020149 - CSA 152 020149 - CV MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL 020149 - CVWD IMP DIST 1 DS 020149 - CVWD STORM WATER UNIT 020149 - DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 020149 - GENERAL 020149 - GENERAL PURPOSE 020149 - LA QUINTA NO-LOW 020149 - RDV PROJ 4-THERMAL 020149 - RIV CO REGIONAL PARK & OPEN SP 020149 - RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION 020150 - CITRUS PEST CONTROL 2 020150 - CITY OF LA QUINTA 020150 - CO FREE LIBRARY 020150 - CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION 020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT BLO HS 020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY PUBLIC 020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY REC & PK 020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY RESOURCE 020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED 020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 020150 - CSA 152 020150 - CV MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL 020150 - CVWD IMP DIST 1 DS 020150 - CVWD STORM WATER UNIT 020150 - DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 020150 - GENERAL 020150 - GENERAL PURPOSE 020150 - LA QUINTA NO-LOW 020150 - RDV PROJ 4-THERMAL 020150 - RIV CO REGIONAL PARK & OPEN SP 020150 - RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION 020195 - CITRUS PEST CONTROL 2 020195 - CITY OF LA QUINTA 020195 - CO FREE LIBRARY 020195 - CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION 020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT BLO HS 020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY PUBLIC 020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY REC & PK 020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY RESOURCE 020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED 020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 020195 - CSA 152 020195 - CV MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL 020195 - CVWD IMP DIST 1 DS 020195 - CVWD IMP DIST 55 020195 - CVWD STORM WATER UNIT 020195 - DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 020195 - GENERAL 020195 - GENERAL PURPOSE 020195 - LA QUINTA NO-LOW 020195 - RDV PROJ 4-THERMAL 020195 - RIV CO REGIONAL PARK & OPEN SP 020195 - RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION Page 6 of 8 on 7/18/2018 3:15:35 PM Status Case Case Description Survey Cases Case Description Administrative Cases PLUS PERMITS & CASES Building and Safety Cases Planning Cases Status Status Case Fire Cases Status Case Description Case DescriptionCase Status Case Description Case Case Case Status Code Cases Case Description N/A N/A N/A 035324 100 AMP CH OF SERVICE TO PUMP FINAL 081049 SVC CHANGE 40HP & 3 HP FINAL 150105 CHG OF SVC (200AMP)TO DWELL FINAL 201569 GRADING 779CY CUT/3867CY FILL ISSUED 204932 100AMP SVC TO 5HP WELL PUMP FINAL 205222 DWELL 4003SF W/ATT GAR 701SF DWELLY R-3 WOOD 4003 110483 PRIGRY M-1 WOOD 701 6379 AIRY R-3 R 4003 8807 PATY M V-N 1515 7424 FINAL 309121 REPAIR EX. OVERHANG (VAL$3000)ISSUED 347085 ELECTRICAL UPGRADE/REPLACE A/C UNIT ISSUED 361264 ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO DWELLING ISSUED BZ258481 M/H SITE PREP FINAL BZ258482 TRAP & SKEET BLDGS FINAL BZ258483 COMM COAC INSTALL FINAL BZ260903 M/H SITE PREP FINAL BZ272130 PLAN CHECK DWL & GAR FINAL BZ272220 DWG & ATT GAR FINAL BZ320815 SITE PREP FINAL BZ326168 PLAN CHECK DWLG & ATT GAR FINAL BZ326169 200 AMP SVC TO 15HP & 40HP MTR FINAL BZ332931 DWLG & ATT GAR FINAL BZ332932 RELOCATE AWNING EXPIRED BZ375505 SITE PREP MOBILE HOME ISSUED BZ399534 ADD HEATERS AND ELECTRIC TO GREENHOUSE FINAL BZA001690 M/H SET UP (SANDPOINTE 12*60)FINAL BZH00194 M/H INSTL (SKYLINE 12*64)FINAL BZH04457 M/H INSTALLATION (24X61 LA PAZ)FINAL N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A CFG01647 F & G FOR EIR 232 (SP00218A1) $850.00 PAID CUP02388 PROPOSAL FOR TRAP SKEET AND PISTOL SHOOTING RANGE EXPIRED CZ05134 CHANGE OF ZONE FROM ? TO SP EA 31647, EIR 232, SP 218, DA 42 APPROVED CZ06454 CHANGE ZONING IN SP218A1 APPROVED EA37465 EA FOR SPOO218A1 APPROVED EA38124 EA FOR GPA00546 COUNTY INITIATED APPLIED GPA00493 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CORAL MT SP218A1 APPROVED GPA00546 ADD MADISON ST AS AN ARTERIAL HWY BETW 60TH & 62ND APPLIED SP00218 SP ON 1251 ACRES WITH 4262 DU'S ON 795 ACRES, 35 A CRES OF COMMERCIAL, 1 ACRE FIRE STATION, * EA 31647, EIR 232, CZ 5134, DA 42 APPROVED SP00218A1 AMENDMENT TO SP 218 APPROVED MAP31249 ISSUED MAP31399 ISSUED Page 7 of 8 on 7/18/2018 3:15:35 PM Maps, permit information and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. Permit Approved Date Plan Check Approved DateApplication Date Septic Permits PERecord Id Record Id Permit Paid Date Well Water Permits Final Inspection Date Well Finaled Date Approved Date * DISCLAIMER * Case Status Transportation Cases Case Description DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERMITS MAP31681 ISSUED MAP34644 ISSUED N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WP0020690 Well Abandonment 10 Mar 2010 10 Mar 2010 Page 8 of 8 on 7/18/2018 3:15:35 PM EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Appendix E    Qualifications Statement  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Earth Systems Pacific  Qualifications Statement for Environmental Work    The principals of the Earth Systems Pacific companies have been consulting for an average of over  20 years, and the combined staff numbers nearly 100.  Earth Systems Pacific’s multidisciplinary  professional staff has extensive experience with and education in chemistry, geology, geophysics,  hydrogeology, mechanical engineering, civil engineering, mapping, soil science, drafting, and surveying.   Our senior project and staff professionals include Certified Engineering Geologists, Registered  Geologists, Registered Environmental Assessors and Professional Engineers.  These professionals are  highly qualified, holding an average of two registrations and/or certifications in their area of expertise.   To continue to meet our commitment to technical expertise, Earth Systems Pacific considers it essential  to train our personnel in the latest scientific advancements in assessment and mitigation techniques.   This involves continuing education in the form of training seminars, literature reviews, and pertinent  conferences to remain abreast of recent developments in this complex and rapidly changing field.  The Environmental Professional [EP] who provided oversight for this project meets the qualifications  specified by US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13.  An EP is defined by US EPA AAI as ”a person who  possesses sufficient specific education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional  judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or  threatened releases (of hazardous substances) on, at, in, or to a property, sufficient to meet the  objectives and performance factors (of the rule).”  In addition, an environmental professional must  have:   A state, tribal, or territory‐issued certification or license (Professional Engineer or Professional  Geologist) and three years of relevant full‐time work experience; or    A Baccalaureate degree or higher in science or engineering and five years of relevant full‐time  work experience; or    Ten years of relevant full‐time work experience.  The attached resumes describe the credentials of the professionals who performed field, research  and/or report preparation work on the project.         Earth Systems Resume      Alexander Schriener Jr., P.G.   Associate Geologist  Mr. Schriener has over thirty‐seven years as an alternative energy, natural  resource and environmental geologist.  He has seven years consulting  experience specifically in the field of environmental geology.  Mr. Schriener  also manages geothermal energy services for Earth Systems.      Key Qualifications:  Mr. Schriener experience performing Phase I Environmental Site  Assessments to evaluate the potential presence of soil and groundwater  contamination at industrial, commercial, residential and agricultural  properties, as well as vacant land.  He has performed Phase II Investigations  to evaluate whether contamination is actually present, and the  concentration and extent of those contaminants.  If contaminates are found,  then site remediation is required.  Mr. Schriener has successfully performed  numerous Phase III site remediation and brought sites to closure with public  agencies.    Mr. Schriener has over thirty years’ experience in geothermal resource  management, development and exploration.  Mr. Schriener has also been an expert witness in legal proceedings involving  geothermal energy management and well drilling.    Relevant Project Experience:  Gasoline Station Investigation and Closure   Mr. Schriener was project manager for an assessment of gasoline stations  with potential leaking underground storage tanks.  He placed monitoring  wells, completed groundwater and soil assessments and successfully got  agency closure on 5 of 7 sites he was managed between 2004 and 2008.     Phase II Site Assessments and Phase III Site Closure   Mr. Schriener was project manager on numerous Phase II site assessments  in the Coachella Valley and southern California.  At each site, he selected the  investigative methods, oversaw sampling and analysis activities, reviewed  the laboratory data, and prepared a report meeting the requirements of the  lender or agency.  If contamination was found, Mr. Schriener prepared a  work plan to mitigate the site and obtain closure.  Significant sites that were  evaluated and closure was obtained included several parcels of farm land  over 20 acres each, a metal salvage yard, an industrial warehouse, a former  cattle ranch and former sewage treatment facility.    Geothermal Exploration and Development   Mr. Schriener over thirty years’ experience in geothermal energy including  geology, geochemistry, geophysics, drilling, reservoir modeling, land  leasing, exploration, and field development.  He has managed the resource  staff and activities in the three major geothermal fields in California: The  Geysers, Coso and The Salton Sea, as well as Desert Peak in Nevada and  Roosevelt/Blundell in Utah.  Mr. Schriener has regularly managed an annual  drilling and resource department budget of over $10 Million.     .  REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS  Professional Geologist, State of California,  2001 (No. 7198)    EDUCATION  B.S., Geology  University of Washington  Seattle, Washington 1976    M.S., Geology  Oregon State University   Corvallis, Oregon 1978    MS Thesis; The Geology and Mineralization  of the Northern Part of the Washougal  Mining District, Skamania County,  Washington.     Professional Affiliations:   Member: Geological Society of America  Member: American Association of  Petroleum Geologists.  Member: Geothermal Resources Council    Publications  19 publications and field trip guidebooks,  including published in: Geological Society of  America, Association of Petroleum  Geologists, United States Geological Survey  Open File Report, Stanford Geothermal  Program Conference, Geothermal  Resources Council Transactions,  Department of Energy, Journal of Scientific  Drilling, and Geochemistry, Geophysics and  Geosystems.              EMAIL  aschriener@earthsystems.com    PRIME OFFICE LOCATION  Bermuda Dunes, CA         Earth Systems  Resume      Kirsten L. Murch Project Geologist    Employed with Earth Systems’ Bermuda Dunes office since 2000, Ms.  Murch is the project coordinator for the Phase I Environmental Site  Assessment projects in our environmental services department.  In this  capacity, she coordinates all aspects regarding these projects, including  fieldwork and report preparation. Ms. Murch also coordinates and  conducts site characterizations (Phase II), including fieldwork, data  evaluation, and report preparation.      KEY QUALIFICATIONS   Project manager for, and conducts environmental site  assessments (Phase I) according to EPA All Appropriate Inquiry  guidelines and entailing site reconnaissance, historical research,  regulatory agency records and database searches, aerial  photograph review, and final report preparation.   Performs site characterizations (Phase II) entailing supervision of  subcontractors, subsurface exploration, sampling of soil and  groundwater, chemical analyses of samples, evaluation of  laboratory data, preparation of final report including  recommendations for remediation.    AREAS OF EXPERTISE   Stream Gauging Study.  Ms. Murch participated in a multi‐ location stream‐gauging program being conducted to evaluate  water quality of a primary drainage channel as part of a  watershed management project.  Tasks included the initial design  of the stream gauging protocol, selection of equipment, and  writing a Standard Operating Procedure manual for stream  gauging for review and approval by the US EPA, and conducting  the stream gauging activities. Ms. Murch was involved with  establishing gauging transects, testing and refining the equipment  operations protocols, conducting the stream gauging, data  evaluation, quality control oversight, and report preparation.     Proposed School Site Preliminary Endangerment Assessments  (PEAs) and Supplemental Site Investigations (SSIs).  Ms. Murch  has conducted and/or assisted in conducting several PEAs and/or  SSIs for the Corona‐Norco Unified School District (CNUSD), the  Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD), and the Palo Verde  Unified School District (PVUSD) in California in liaison with the  Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).     Environmental Site Assessments.  Ms. Murch has conducted over  three hundred ESAs in the Coachella Valley of California,  southeastern California, and high desert areas of southern  California.      REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS   OSHA 40‐Hour HAZWOPER Course    EDUCATION  B.A. Geology, Archaeology Minor, Smith  College 1997     PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS  Sigma Xi Associate Member    EMAIL  kmurch@earthsys.com    PRIME OFFICE LOCATION  Bermuda Dunes, CA    EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Appendix F    Reliance Form EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  Application for Authorization to Rely on Environmental Report  This form serves as an application for third parties to apply for permission to use and rely on the referenced  report [Report].  It is the applicant’s responsibility to obtain the approval of the original client prior to submitting  the form.  As a condition of approval for authorization to use and rely on the referenced Report, applicant agrees  to waive any conflict of interest arising out of, and applicant will not object to, our representation of our original  client; that Earth Systems Pacific’s liability for errors and omissions from the Report shall be limited to $15,000;  and Earth Systems Pacific shall have no liability for any other cause or action.  Use of this Report without written  permission releases Earth Systems Pacific from any liability that may arise from the use of this Report.    Reference:  Report of Environmental Site Assessment, 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street, W. of Madison  Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60, La Quinta, Riverside County, California, File No. 300300‐ 005, Doc. No. 18‐08‐702, dated August 3, 2018.   Original Client: Sunrise Company, 300 Eagle Dance Circle, Palm Desert, California 92211, Mr. Phillip K. Smith   (760) 772‐7227      To be completed by Applicant.  A processing fee of $200 made payable to Earth Systems Pacific must  accompany application.  Submit to Earth Systems Pacific, 79811 Country Club Drive, Indio, California 92203.   Signature signifies applicant’s acceptance of the use and liability limitations described above, and caveats  described below*.      By:                              (Company Name)                           (Print Name)                                              (Address)                            (Signature)    Title:                              (City, State, Zip)        Date:          (Telephone)              (FAX)  Approval of Original Client  By:                        (Print Name)                                (Signature)    For Earth Systems Pacific’s use only                  Approved for re‐use with caveat that findings discussed in Report were based on available  information and site conditions as noted at time of Report, but may not be applicable to current site  conditions.                   Disapproved (application fee to be refunded).    By:  Date:                 (Earth Systems Pacific)  *Caveats ‐ Applicant understands and agrees that the referenced Report is a copyrighted document, that Earth Systems Pacific is the  copyright owner, and that unauthorized use or copying of the Report is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Earth  Systems Pacific.  Applicant understands that Earth Systems Pacific may withhold such permission at its sole discretion, or grant permission  upon such terms and conditions as it deems acceptable.  Applicant acknowledges that: (1) Earth Systems Pacific did not have an  opportunity to evaluate the applicant’s relationship to the site; (2) Applicant‐specific information can affect the conclusions and  recommendations presented in the Report; (3) The Report speaks only to conditions observed onsite at the time of the site visit, and site  conditions may have changed since that time; (4) The scope of the Report was limited to the scope defined by our proposal; (4) The shelf  life of the Report, as defined by the EPA All Appropriate Inquiry [AAI] guidelines, is six months (the Report expires after six months and  should not be relied upon without an update in accordance with the AAI guidelines); and, (5) Earth Systems Pacific maintains its contract  with the original client for the Report.     Sunrise Company  300 Eagle Dance Circle  Palm Desert, California 92211   Job No.: 300300‐007  Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R  Revised Report of  Preliminary Phase II Investigation for  Organochlorine Pesticides  377.206 Acres West of Madison  W of Madison Street, S of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60  La Quinta, Riverside County, California              September 10, 2018  Revised September 17, 2018                      © 2018 Earth Systems Pacific  Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited  without the express written consent of Earth Systems Pacific.      EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  September 10, 2018 File No. 300300‐007  Revised September 17, 2018 Doc. No. 18‐09‐703R     Sunrise Company  300 Eagle Dance Circle  Palm Desert, California 92211    Attention: Mr. Phillip K. Smith     Subject: Revised Report of Preliminary Phase II Investigation for Organochlorine Pesticides    Project: 377.206 Acres West of Madison   West of Madison Street, South of Avenue 58, North of Avenue 60   La Quinta, Riverside County, California      Earth Systems Pacific [Earth Systems] has completed a limited surface investigation to evaluate  the potential presence of regulated levels of pesticides, regarding the site referenced above.  This  report has been prepared to document our activities and present our findings, conclusions and  recommendations in accordance with Proposal No.: BER‐18‐8‐004, Reference File No.: 300300‐ 005, dated August 8, 2018.  This report was revised to correct the identification of a street name.   No conclusions or recommendations have been changed.  Background  The site consists of approximately 377.206 acres of fallow agricultural land and former building  sites located west of Madison Street, south of Avenue 58 and north of Avenue 60 in La Quinta,  Riverside County, California.  Earth Systems recently completed a Phase I Environmental Site  Assessment (ESA) for the site (Earth Systems Pacific, 2018). There were 7 Recognized  Environmental Concerns [RECs] identified that require additional field work.  These include:  1) AC pipe found onsite that should be properly removed by a licensed asbestos‐removal  contractor.   2) The potential that former building areas may contain abandoned underground storage tanks  and or septic systems.  A geophysical survey for these features is warranted and, if found,  appropriate soil sampling for the potential presence of contaminants.    3) Prior limited soil sampling and testing for currently banned Organochlorine Pesticides [OCPs]  by Earth Systems (Earth Systems, 2007) in parts of the site associated with location of  irrigation laterals, revealed levels of OCPs above levels of regulatory concern.  Thus,  additional soil sampling and analysis is warranted for former buildings locations and  agricultural areas of the site.    4) Arsenic‐based pesticides were also commonly used at the same time as banned OCPs.  Testing  for arsenic in soil samples that have elevated levels of OPCs is warranted.   September 10, 2018 ‐ 2 ‐ Job No.: 300300‐007  Revised September 17, 2018  Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  5) There is the potential for the presence of lead residue in the soil around buildings from lead‐ based paint.  Soil sampling with analysis is warranted.  6) Abandonment of known old water wells onsite is warranted.    7) There is the potential for the presence of heavy metals in the soil relative to the trap and  skeet buildings.  If this is a concern, soil sampling with analysis could be conducted.  This study involves only recommendation 3; the investigation of the presence of DDT and related  OCPs on site.  The other 6 recommendations can be done later, as warranted.      To investigate the presence of OCPs, 56 surface samples were collected in the fields and  composited into 14 sets of 4 samples each.  Twenty‐four samples were collected around the  former residences and buildings.  Of these samples, 8 composite samples were selected from the  field areas (that showed most obvious prior agricultural usage), and 10 samples from the former  building areas were analyzed for OCPs.     Site Description  The site consists of approximately 377.206 acres of fallow agricultural land located south of  Avenue 58, west of Madison Street and north of Avenue 60 in La Quinta, California (Figure 1).   The site is bounded on the north by Avenue 58, the east by a residential development, and the  south and west by undeveloped land (Figure 2).  At the time of the sampling most of the site was  fallow (Photo 1).  Five possible residences formally existed on site, and currently only the shell of  one structure exists on the site (Photo 2).  All that remains of the other four structures is  disturbed ground.      Generally, the soils exposed around the site were sandy silt to silty sand, typical of lacustrine  deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla, with evidence of gastropod and bivalve shells from the former  lake deposits.    Geology and Hydrogeology  The site is located in the Coachella Valley of Southern California.  The Coachella Valley is part of  the tectonically active Salton Trough, which is a closed, internally draining basin bound by the  San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains to the southwest; the San Bernardino Mountains to the  northwest; and the Little San Bernardino and Orocopia Mountains to the northeast and east.   These mountain ranges, and the basement rock underlying the Coachella Valley, are primarily  composed of granitic and metamorphic rock.  Within the Coachella Valley, the basement complex  is overlain by a series of unconsolidated and semi‐consolidated continental clastic sediments  eroded from the surrounding mountain ranges; lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla; and  wind‐blown sand deposited in the active blow‐sand area of Riverside County (DWR, 1964).  The  site is located on lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla.    The depth to groundwater at the site was evaluated by contacting Mr. Saul Montalvo with the  Coachella Valley Water District [CVWD].  Mr. Montalvo indicated that the depth to groundwater  September 10, 2018 ‐ 3 ‐ Job No.: 300300‐007  Revised September 17, 2018  Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  in the CVWD production well located approximately 0.3 miles south of the southeast corner of  the site was 67.8 feet below ground surface [bgs] on June 26, 2018.  Note that the CVWD obtains  depth to water information from production wells that tend to tap deeper aquifers and may not  represent uppermost groundwater.  Note that CVWD recharge basins are located 0.1 miles south  of the site.    Purpose and Scope of Work  The purpose of this work is to evaluate the potential presence of pesticide residues at the former  agricultural portion of site, with the chemicals of concern being OCPs.  The purpose was also to  evaluate the presence of OCPs in the area around the former building areas, where such  chemicals could have been applied for pest control, stored or mixed.     Tasks performed to accomplish this objective are outlined below.     Surface Sampling   The presence of surface contamination was evaluated by collecting surface soil samples.  The  following samples were collected between August 13 and 15, 2018.  The approximate locations  of the samples are shown on Figure 2 through 8 in Appendix A.  1) Fifty‐six surface samples (SS‐1 through SS‐56) were collected in former agricultural fields.   Each set of four adjoining primary samples were composited by the laboratory into one  sample, for a total of 14 composite samples (Composite A through N).  Of these, 8  composite samples were analyzed for OCPs (Composite B‐E, and J‐M).  The other samples  were held, pending results of the first set.  2) Twenty‐three surface samples were collected adjacent to the former buildings and the  slab on site.  The samples collected were as follows:  Residence 1 (H1‐1 to H1‐5, Figure 3),  Residence 2 (H2‐1 to H2‐5, Figure 4), Residence 3 (H3‐1 to H3‐3, Figure 5), Residence 4  (H4‐1 to H4‐5, Figure 6), Residence 5 (H5‐1 to H5‐3, Figure 7) and the slab (SB‐1 to SB‐3,  Figure 8).  Of these 23 samples, 10 samples were analyzed for OCPs (H1‐1, H1‐3, H2‐1, H2‐ 4, H3‐1, H4‐3, H4‐4, H5‐1, H5‐2 and SB‐3).  The other samples were held, pending results  of the first set.    The samples were collected at a depth of approximately 1 inch below the surface.  If needed, a  disposable tool was used to move surface and plant debris out of the way of the sampling  location.  The laboratory supplied sample container was then pushed directly into the exposed  soil to collect a sample.  Each jar is sealed with a Teflon‐lined screw‐on lid.  The samples were  labeled and logged onto a chain‐of‐custody form, placed into an ice‐chest, and transported to a  California‐certified testing laboratory.    Laboratory Testing  Analysis of the collected samples was performed by A & R Laboratories, a California‐certified  testing laboratory.  The analyses consisted of the following:    September 10, 2018 ‐ 4 ‐ Job No.: 300300‐007  Revised September 17, 2018  Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  1) Eight composite samples were analyzed for OCP residues using EPA method 8081A.   2) Ten discrete samples located in the general former building site area were analyzed for  OCP residues, using EPA method 8081A.  A summary of the test results is presented in Table 1.  The laboratory report is presented in  Appendix B.    Laboratory Results    Organochlorine Pesticides ‐ As shown in Table 1, all 8 composite soil samples taken in the former  agricultural field and all 10 discrete soil samples taken in the general building areas contained  traces of OCPs.     In the field areas, DDE and DDT were detected in all the composite 8 samples analyzed.   DDD was detected in 4 of the 8 composite field samples.  Dieldrin was detected in 1  sample and Chlordane was detected in 5 of the 8 samples.   No other OCPs were detected  in the composite samples.  None of the concentrations detected for any of the OCP  compounds exceeded the Regional Screening Level for Residential [RSL‐R], a US EPA  guideline for evaluating whether concentrations pose a health hazard under typical  residential land‐use scenarios.  Total DDT (TDE), which is the additive sum of the DDT,  DDE and DDD concentrations, is the Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) which is  the level that defines a compound as a regulated waste.  Four of the 8 composite samples  collected in the fields (Composites B – E) exceeded the TTLC level for TDE.       In the building areas, DDE was detected in all the 10 samples analyzed.  DDT was detected  in 3 of the 10 samples and DDD was not detected in any of the 10 samples.  Dieldrin was  detected in 2 samples and Chlordane was detected in 1 of the 10 samples.   No other OCPs  were detected in the samples around the former home sites.  None of the concentrations  detected for any of the OCP compounds exceeded the RSL‐R.  None of the samples were  over the TTLC TDE level that defines a compound as a regulated waste.     Summary    Based on the field activities and laboratory testing results, Earth Systems offers the following  summary on this preliminary testing for OCPs:    1. Up to five OCPs were detected in all samples collected in the former agricultural field  areas and around the five residences and slab.  DDE and DDT were detected in all samples  from the fields.  DDE was detected in all samples around the former residences and slab.   DDD, Dieldrin, and Chlordane were detected in selected other samples.  Only one sample,  Field composite sample K, had detectable amounts of all five OCPs.  Other OCPS were not  detected.   September 10, 2018 ‐ 5 ‐ Job No.: 300300‐007  Revised September 17, 2018  Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  2. None of the surface soil samples collected in the fields or around the five former  residences had levels of OCPs that exceeded the US EPA RSL‐R, a guideline used for  determining if a compound or metal is a potential health hazard in residential building  area.    3. Four of the eight composite samples collected in the former agricultural fields exceeded  the TTLC limit for TDE (additive of the three total DDT compounds).  These areas were  Composite Areas B, C, D and E.    4. Since half of the field samples analyzed for OPCs exceeded the TTLC level for TDE, and not  all the fields were tested for OCPs, it is recommended that any soil planned to be exported  off the current site be tested for OCPs prior to export.  If found to exceed regulatory limits,  the soil should be manifested appropriately.      ‐o0o‐    Earth Systems appreciates the opportunity to assist you on the project.  If we can be of further  assistance, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (760) 345‐1588. Note that this report  was prepared based on our proposal for scope of services and contract with our client, and may  not meet the needs of other users. Use of this report by others is at the sole risk of the user.  Additional limitations on the use of this report are presented in Appendix C.    Respectfully submitted,  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC         Alexander Schriener Jr., PG  Associate Geologist    Rpt/asj/cgj    Attachments: Appendix A – Figures, Photos and Tables   Appendix B – Laboratory Report   Appendix C – Limitations   September 10, 2018 ‐ 6 ‐ Job No.: 300300‐007  Revised September 17, 2018  Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R  EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  References  California Department of Water Resources [DWR], 1964, Bulletin Number 108 – Coachella Valley  Investigation, July 1964.    California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2008, Interim Guidance for Sampling  Agricultural Properties (Third Revision), California Environmental Protection Agency,  Dated April 30, 2008.  Earth Systems Southwest, 2007, Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update with  Supplemental Pesticides Sampling West Andalusia – Irrigation Laterals, West of Madison  Street Between Avenues 58 and 60, La Quinta, Riverside County, California, File No.:  09305‐08, Doc No.: 07‐01‐752, dated January 12, 2007.   Earth Systems Pacific, 2018, Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 377.206 Acres  West of Madison Street, W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60, La Quinta,  Riverside County, California, File No.: 300300‐005, Doc. No. 18‐08‐702, dated August 3,  2018.   United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute Indio, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo‐revised 1972.   United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle, 1959, photo‐revised  1980.   United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute Martinez Mountain, Calif. Quadrangle, 1981, photo‐ revised 1988.   United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute Valerie, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo‐revised 1972.   US Department of Environmental Protection, 2018, Region 9, Preliminary Remediation Goals  Table.    EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  APPENDIX A  Figure 1 – Site Location Map  Figure 2 – Former Agricultural Field Sample Location Map  Figure 3 – H‐1 Former Building Site Sample Location Map  Figure 4 – H‐2 Former Building Site Sample Location Map  Figure 5 – H‐3 Former Building Site Sample Location Map  Figure 6 – H‐4 Former Building Site Sample Location Map  Figure 7 – H‐5 Former Building Site Sample Location Map  Figure 8 – Slab Site Sample Location Map  Site Photographs  Table 1 – OCPs     Scale: 1" = 2,000’ 0 2,000’ 4,000’ Figure 1 Site Location Approximate Site Boundary Base Map: USGS 7-1/2' Quadrangle, Indio, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo-revised 1972; La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle, 1959, photo- revised 1980; Martinez Mtn., Calif. Quadrangle, 1981, photo-revised 1988; Valerie, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo-revised 1972. File No.: 300300-007 SITE Earth Systems ϵ/ϭϬ/2018 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California LEGEND Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.Madison S t ree tMadison S t ree t Avenue 58Avenue 58 Avenue 60Avenue 60 H1H1 H2H2 H3H3 Concrete SlabConcrete Slab H4H4 H5H5 Figure 2 Sample Location Map Approximate Scale: 1” = 575’ 0 575’ 1,150’ SS-51 (Comp-E) SS-51 (Comp-E) LEGEND Approximate Sample Locations Approximate Site Boundary Approximate Building Site Area Earth Systems 9/10/2018 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California File No.: 300300-007 SS-51 (Comp-E) SS-51 (Comp-E) SS-48 (Comp-L) SS-48 (Comp-L) SS-47 (Comp-L) SS-47 (Comp-L) SS-46 (Comp-L) SS-46 (Comp-L) SS-45 (Comp-L) SS-45 (Comp-L) SS-41 (Comp-K) SS-41 (Comp-K) SS-42 (Comp-K) SS-42 (Comp-K) SS-43 (Comp-K) SS-43 (Comp-K) SS-44 (Comp-K) SS-44 (Comp-K) SS-20 (Comp-E) SS-20 (Comp-E) SS-19 (Comp-E) SS-19 (Comp-E) SS-18 (Comp-E) SS-18 (Comp-E) SS-17 (Comp-E) SS-17 (Comp-E) SS-15 (Comp-D) SS-15 (Comp-D) SS-16 (Comp-D) SS-16 (Comp-D) SS-13 (Comp-D) SS-13 (Comp-D) SS-14 (Comp-D) SS-14 (Comp-D) SS-37 (Comp-J) SS-37 (Comp-J) SS-38 (Comp-J) SS-38 (Comp-J) SS-39 (Comp-J) SS-39 (Comp-J) SS-40 (Comp-J) SS-40 (Comp-J) SS-7 (Comp-B) SS-7 (Comp-B) SS-6 (Comp-B) SS-6 (Comp-B) SS-5 (Comp-B) SS-5 (Comp-B) SS-8 (Comp-B) SS-8 (Comp-B) SS-9 (Comp-C) SS-9 (Comp-C) SS-10 (Comp-C) SS-10 (Comp-C) SS-11 (Comp-C) SS-11 (Comp-C) SS-12 (Comp-C) SS-12 (Comp-C) SS-52 (Comp-M) SS-52 (Comp-M) SS-51 (Comp-M) SS-51 (Comp-M) SS-50 (Comp-M) SS-50 (Comp-M) SS-49 (Comp-M) SS-49 (Comp-M) SS-3 (Comp-A) SS-3 (Comp-A) SS-4 (Comp-A) SS-4 (Comp-A) SS-2 (Comp-A) SS-2 (Comp-A) SS-1 (Comp-A) SS-1 (Comp-A) SS-26 (Comp-G) SS-26 (Comp-G) SS-25 (Comp-G) SS-25 (Comp-G) SS-27 (Comp-G) SS-27 (Comp-G) SS-28 (Comp-G) SS-28 (Comp-G) SS-29 (Comp-H) SS-29 (Comp-H) SS-32 (Comp-H) SS-32 (Comp-H) SS-33 (Comp-I) SS-33 (Comp-I) SS-34 (Comp-I) SS-34 (Comp-I) SS-35 (Comp-I) SS-35 (Comp-I) SS-36 (Comp-I) SS-36 (Comp-I)SS-31 (Comp-H) SS-31 (Comp-H) SS-30 (Comp-H) SS-30 (Comp-H) SS-56 (Comp-N) SS-56 (Comp-N) SS-55 (Comp-N) SS-55 (Comp-N) SS-54 (Comp-N) SS-54 (Comp-N) SS-53 (Comp-N) SS-53 (Comp-N) SS-22 (Comp-F) SS-22 (Comp-F)SS-21 (Comp-F) SS-21 (Comp-F) SS-23 (Comp-F) SS-23 (Comp-F) SS-24 (Comp-F) SS-24 (Comp-F) Exceeded TDE TTLC Limit Less Than TDE TTLC Limit Not Analyzed Scale: 1" = 100’ 0 100’ 200’ H-1 Pullout Sample Locations File No.: 300300-007 Earth Systems 9/10/2018 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California LEGEND Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018. H1-5H1-5 Approximate Sample Locations H1-5H1-5 H1-2H1-2 H1-3H1-3 H1-4H1-4 H1-1H1-1 Well 1Well 1 Less Than TDE TTLC Limit Not Analyzed Figure 3 Figure 4 Scale: 1" = 50’ 0 50’ 100’ H-2 Pullout Sample Locations File No.: 300300-007 Earth Systems 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018. H2-1H2-1 H2-4H2-4 H2-3H2-3 H2-2H2-2 H2-5H2-5 LEGEND H2-5H2-5 Approximate Sample Locations Less Than TDE TTLC Limit Not Analyzed 9/10/2018 Figure 5 Scale: 1" = 100’ 0 100’ 200’ H-3 Pullout Sample Locations File No.: 300300-007 Earth Systems 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018. H3-1H3-1 H3-2H3-2 H3-3H3-3 LEGEND H3-3H3-3 Approximate Sample Locations Less Than TDE TTLC Limit Not Analyzed 9/10/2018 Figure 6 Scale: 1" = 70’ 0 70’ 140’ H-4 Pullout Sample Locations File No.: 300300-007 Earth Systems 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018. H4-4H4-4 H4-3H4-3 H4-5H4-5 H4-2H4-2 H4-1H4-1 LEGEND H4-5H4-5 Approximate Sample Locations Less Than TDE TTLC Limit Not Analyzed 9/10/2018 Figure 7 Scale: 1" = 100’ 0 100’ 200’ H-5 Pullout Sample Locations File No.: 300300-007 Earth Systems 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018. H5-2H5-2 H5-1H5-1 H5-3H5-3 Well 4Well 4 LEGEND H5-3H5-3 Approximate Sample Locations Less Than TDE TTLC Limit Not Analyzed 9/10/2018 Figure 8 Scale: 1" = 50’ 0 50’ 100’ Slab Pullout Sample Locations File No.: 300300-007 Earth Systems 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018. SB-3SB-3 SB-1SB-1 SB-2SB-2 Well 2Well 2 LEGEND SB-3SB-3 Approximate Sample Locations Less Than TDE TTLC Limit Not Analyzed 9/10/2018 Site Photographs Page 1 of 1 Storm Drain Inlet File No.: 300300-0079/10/2018 Photo 1: Typical former agricultural field area at sample location SS-07. Photo 2: Building area H-2. Location of H2-1 and H2-4. SS-7 H2-1 H2-4 Earth Systems 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California Table 1 Organochlorine Pesticides in Former Agricultural Fields and around Home Site EPA Method 8081 Collection Date Area Composite/Sample ID 4,4-DDE 4,4-DDT 4,4-DDD Dieldrin Chlordane Other OCPs Field B (SS5-SS8)1.4 0.062 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 0.018 ND Field C (SS9-SS12)1.2 0.043 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND Field D (SS13-SS16)1.5 0.037 0.022 ND< 0.002 0.020 ND Field E (SS17-SS20)1.4 0.048 0.025 ND< 0.002 0.016 ND Field J (SS37-SS40)0.57 0.026 0.019 ND< 0.002 0.011 ND Field K (SS41-SS44)0.40 0.035 0.020 0.020 0.011 ND Field L (SS45-SS48)0.20 0.014 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND 15-Aug-18 Field M (SS49-SS52)0.18 0.011 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.020 ND 13-Aug-18 home 3 H3-1 0.23 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND H1-1 0.0064 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND H1-3 0.0020 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND H2-1 0.060 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND H2-4 0.070 0.062 ND< 0.002 0.0056 0.066 ND H4-3 0.056 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND H4-4 0.020 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.020 ND H5-1 0.012 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 0.012 ND< 0.020 ND H5-2 0.092 0.018 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 14-Aug-18 Slab SB-3 0.40 0.014 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.020 ND na na Various 1.7 mg/kg 1.7 mg/kg 2.4 mg/kg 0.034 mg/kg 1.7 mg/kg Various 7.0 mg/kg 7.0 mg/kg 10.0 mg/kg 0.14 mg/kg 7.7 mg/kg Various Notes:All concentrations in mg/kg. Composite samples were made as shown by the laboratory. ND - not detected greater than the listed detection limit. Na is not available Red high-lighted values exceed the TTLC guideline Yellow high-lighted values exceed the Residential PRGs 13-Aug-18 14-Aug-18 14-Aug-18 home 1 home 2 home 4 1.0 mg/kg as sum total of DDT, DDE, DDD (TDE) Residential PRG Industrial PRG home 5 15-Aug-18 "Other OCPs" includes: Aldrin, Alpha-BHC, Beta-BHC, Delta-BHC, Gamma-BHC, Endosulfan I, Endosulfan II, Endosulfan sulfate, Endrin, Endrin Aldehyde, Endrin Ketone, Heptachlor, Heptachlor Epoxide, and Methoxychlor TTLC ESP # 300300-007 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  APPENDIX B   Laboratory Reports     951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 1 of 19 CASE NARRATIVE Authorized Signature Name / Title (print)Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President 08/22/2018 16:41:37 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.)1808-00158 Project Name / No.WEST OF MADISON-P-2 300300-007 Dates Sampled (from/to)08/13/18 To 08/15/18 Dates Received (from/to)08/15/18 To 08/15/18 Dates Reported (from/to)08/22/18 To 8/22/2018 Chains of Custody Received Yes Comments: Subcontracting Organic Analyses No analyses sub-contracted Other Analyses No analyses sub-contracted Sample Condition(s) All samples intact The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 2 of 19 Laboratory Job# 1808-00158 Positive Results (Organic Compounds) Sample RLUnitsResultAnalyte AnalyteSampleQual Result Qual Units RL 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.020H3-1 0.23 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.0020H1-1 0.0064 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.0020H1-3 0.0020 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.020SB-3 0.40 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020SB-3 0.014 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.020H2-1 0.060 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.0020H2-4 0.070 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020H2-4 0.062 Chlordane mg/Kg 0.010H2-4 0.066 Dieldrin mg/Kg 0.0020H2-4 0.0056 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.0020H5-1 0.012 Dieldrin mg/Kg 0.0020H5-1 0.012 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.0020H5-2 0.092 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020H5-2 0.018 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.0020H4-3 0.056 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.0020H4-4 0.020 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.10COMPOSITE B 1.4 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE B 0.062 Chlordane mg/Kg 0.010COMPOSITE B 0.018 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.10COMPOSITE C 1.2 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE C 0.043 4,4'-DDD mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE D 0.022 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.10COMPOSITE D 1.5 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE D 0.037 Chlordane mg/Kg 0.010COMPOSITE D 0.020 4,4'-DDD mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE E 0.025 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.10COMPOSITE E 1.4 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE E 0.048 Chlordane mg/Kg 0.010COMPOSITE E 0.016 4,4'-DDD mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE J 0.019 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.020COMPOSITE J 0.57 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE J 0.026 Chlordane mg/Kg 0.010COMPOSITE J 0.011 4,4'-DDD mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE K 0.020 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.020COMPOSITE K 0.40 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE K 0.035 Chlordane mg/Kg 0.010COMPOSITE K 0.011 Dieldrin mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE K 0.020 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.020COMPOSITE L 0.20 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE L 0.014 4,4'-DDE mg/Kg 0.020COMPOSITE M 0.18 4,4'-DDT mg/Kg 0.0020COMPOSITE M 0.011 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 3 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 001 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ H3-1 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/22/180.23 10.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1875 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1890 002 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 7:35@ H1-1 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 4 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 002 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 7:35@ H1-1 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.0064 1.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1869 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1875 003 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 7:42@ H1-3 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 5 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 003 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 7:42@ H1-3 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1880 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1881 004 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 8:27@ SB-3 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 10.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/22/180.40 10.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 6 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 004 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 8:27@ SB-3 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.014 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1879 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1884 005 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 8:37@ H2-1 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.10 08/22/18<0.010 10.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 10.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/22/180.060 10.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 7 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 005 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 8:37@ H2-1 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1869 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1874 006 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 8:50@ H2-4 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/180.066 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.070 1.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.062 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.0056 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 8 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 006 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 8:50@ H2-4 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/18102 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1897 007 Date & Time Sampled: 08/15/18 6:35@ H5-1 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.012 1.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.012 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 9 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 007 Date & Time Sampled: 08/15/18 6:35@ H5-1 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1875 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1866 008 Date & Time Sampled: 08/15/18 6:43@ H5-2 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.092 10.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.018 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 10 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 008 Date & Time Sampled: 08/15/18 6:43@ H5-2 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1897 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1887 009 Date & Time Sampled: 08/15/18 8:05@ H4-3 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.056 1.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1898 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1897 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 11 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 010 Date & Time Sampled: 08/15/18 8:12@ H4-4 Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.020 1.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/18101 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1891 011 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE B Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 12 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 011 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE B Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/180.018 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.10 08/22/181.4 50.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.062 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 50.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1882 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1890 012 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE C Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 13 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 012 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE C Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.10 08/22/181.2 50.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.043 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 50.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1884 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1887 013 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE D Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/180.020 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.022 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 14 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 013 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE D Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.10 08/22/181.5 50.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.037 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 50.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1895 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1880 014 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE E Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/180.016 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.025 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.10 08/22/181.4 50.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.048 50.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 50.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 15 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 014 Date & Time Sampled: 08/13/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE E Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1894 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1896 015 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE J Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/180.011 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.019 10.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/22/180.57 10.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.026 10.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 10.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 16 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 015 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE J Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1895 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1896 016 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE K Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/180.011 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.020 10.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/22/180.40 10.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.035 10.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.020 10.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 17 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 016 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE K Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1880 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1891 017 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE L Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/22/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/22/180.20 10.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.014 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 18 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 017 Date & Time Sampled: 08/14/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE L Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1872 Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1877 018 Date & Time Sampled: 08/15/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE M Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil [Pesticides] Ultrasonic Extraction ALEPA 3550 08/20/18Complete 1.0 Aldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 alpha-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 beta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 delta-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 gamma-BHC AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Chlordane AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 4,4'-DDD AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 4,4'-DDE AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/22/180.18 10.0 4,4'-DDT AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/180.011 1.0 Dieldrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 10.0 Endosulfan I AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Endosulfan II AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endosulfan Sulfate AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin Aldehyde AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0020 08/21/18<0.0020 1.0 Endrin ketone AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.100 08/21/18<0.100 1.0 Heptachlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Heptachlor Epoxide AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.0010 08/21/18<0.0010 1.0 Methoxychlor AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.010 08/21/18<0.010 1.0 Toxaphene AREPA 8081Amg/Kg 0.020 08/21/18<0.020 1.0 [Surrogates] Tetrachloro-m-xylene AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1885 The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. www.arlaboratories.com office@arlaboratories.com Page 19 of 19 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Cust # Permit Number Customer P.O. 83295 1035 300300-007 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 Analysis Result DateMethod 08/22/18 08/15/18 Units TechRLDFQual EARTH SYSTEMS ALEX SCHRIENER 79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INDIO, CA 92203 018 Date & Time Sampled: 08/15/18 12:00@ COMPOSITE M Sample: Sample Matrix:Soil .....continued Decachlorobiphenyl AREPA 8081A/8082%REC 50-150 08/21/1887 Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - Lab Director ABBREVIATIONS DF = Dilution Factor RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF Qual = Qualifier Tech = Technician QUALIFIERS B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL. B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high. D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution. E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument. H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference. J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL. Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation. S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded. As regulatory limits change frequently, A & R Laboratories advises the recipient of this report to confirm such limits with the appropriate federal, state, or local authorities before acting in reliance on the regulatory limits provided. For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at office@arlaboratories.com. The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory. USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES 951-779-0310 FDA# LA City# ELAP#'s 1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ONTARIO, CA 91761 FAX 951-779-0344 2030513 10261 2789 2790 2122 A & R Laboratories, Inc. office@arlaboratories.com www.arlaboratories.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT Page 1 of 1 EARTH SYSTEMS INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported Date Received Invoice No. Customer # Date Sampled 83295 1035 08/14/2018 Customer P.O. 1808-00158 Project: WEST OF MADISON-P-2 08/22/2018 08/15/2018 300300-007 EPA 8081AMethod # Technician: AR Date Analyzed: 8/21/2018 75717QC Reference # 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018Samples Results LCS %REC SPIKE %REC SPIKE %DUP SPIKE %RPD 4,4'-DDT 80 75 76 1.0 Aldrin 130 92 86 6.0 Dieldrin 110 102 105 3.0 Endrin 90 87 91 4.0 gamma-BHC 120 96 93 3.0 Heptachlor 120 93 86 7.0 Control Ranges LCS %REC SPIKE %RPD 50 - 130 0 - 30 50 - 140 0 - 30 70 - 130 0 - 30 70 - 150 0 - 30 50 - 150 0 - 30 50 - 150 0 - 30 EPA 8081A/8082Method # Technician: AR Date Analyzed: 8/21/2018 75717QC Reference # 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018Samples No QC recoveries reported. No method blank results were above reporting limit Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - President For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at office@arlaboratories.com. EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC  APPENDIX C   Limitations    LIMITATIONS      This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Sunrise Company.  The conclusions and  recommendations rendered in this report are opinions based on readily available information  obtained to date within the scope of the work authorized by the client.  The scope of work for  this project was developed to address the needs of the client and may not meet the needs of  other users.  Any other use of or reliance on the information and opinions contained in this report  without the written authorization of Earth Systems is at the sole risk of the user.      The results contained in this report are based upon the information acquired during the  investigation, and may include information obtained from third parties.  Earth Systems makes no  claim as to the accuracy of the information obtained from others.  It should be noted that any  level of assessment cannot ascertain that a property is completely free of chemical or toxic  substances.  It is possible that variations exist beyond or between points explored during the  course of the investigation, and that changes in conditions can occur in the future due to the  works of man, contaminant migration, variations in rainfall, temperature, and/or other factors  not apparent at the time of the field investigation.       The services performed by Earth Systems have been conducted in a manner consistent with the  level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing  under similar conditions in the site vicinity.  No warranty is expressed or implied.       1 From:James Vaughn <JVaughn@szrlaw.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:30 AM To:Nicole Criste (Contract Planner); Monika Radeva; Consulting Planner Cc:Cheri Flores; John Gamlin; Garrett Simon; Rick Zeilenga Subject:RE: Coral Mountain Resort - Request Re City's STVR Reports Attachments:March 1, 2022 City Council Staff Report on STVRs.pdf; June 7, 2022 Staff Reort on STVRs.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening  attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. **  Hi Monika and Nicole,   Attached are the two City Staff reports and attachments on STVRs referenced in my prior email (below).  These reports  demonstrate the following key facts and conclusions regarding short‐term vacation rentals (STVRs) in the City of La  Quinta:  1.STVRs located in the City’s Tourist Commercial zones and other areas exempt from the City’s ban on new STVR permits have a remarkably low rate of complaints as compared to STVRs in the City’s other neighborhoods. 2.The City’s ban on new STVR permits in most areas of the City has already led to a 19.4% decrease in total permits in 2021, which will reduce the TOT revenue the City receives from STVRs, making the need for STVRS in the Tourist Commercial and other exempt areas even more important. 3.The ballot measure proposed for the November 2022 election, if passed, would expedite the phasing out of STVRs in all non‐exempt areas (which generate approximately 82% of total STVR TOT revenues) and could cost the City more than $6 million in annual revenues from these STVRs. These materials also demonstrate the substantial public benefit that will be created by allowing STVRs in the proposed  Coral Mountain Resort project, because these STVRs can help replace the TOT revenue the City will be losing in the non‐ exempt areas of the City.   Thanks,   Jim  James D. Vaughn, Esq. Stowell, Zeilenga, Ruth, Vaughn & Treiger LLP jvaughn@szrlaw.com l www.szrlaw.com 2 Office: 805.446.1496 l Direct: 805.446.7609 l Mobile 805.551.0688 4695 MacArthur Court 4590 East Thousand Oaks Blvd. Suite 200 Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Westlake Village, California 91362    From: Nicole Criste <ncriste@terranovaplanning.com>   Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:05 AM  To: James Vaughn <JVaughn@szrlaw.com>; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner  <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; John Gamlin <jgamlin@coralmountain.com>  Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Resort ‐ Request Re City's STVR Reports     Jim,    Please attach the staff reports referenced below. We are not able to do that for you.    Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH, INC.® 42635 Melanie Place, Ste 101 PALM DESERT, CA. 92211 (760) 341-4800 FAX#: 760-341-4455 E-Mail: ncriste@terranovaplanning.com         From: James Vaughn <JVaughn@szrlaw.com>  Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 10:02 AM  To: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Nicole Criste <ncriste@terranovaplanning.com>, Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>, John Gamlin  <jgamlin@coralmountain.com>  Subject: Coral Mountain Resort ‐ Request Re City's STVR Reports     Hi Monika,      We would like to include two recent City Staff Reports and attachments on STVRs in the administrative record for the  Coral Mountain Resort project.  The specific reports are as follows:     1. Study Session Agenda Item No. 1 for the March 1, 2022 City Council Meeting – Staff Report discussing the City’s  Short‐Term Vacation Rental Program 2021; and      2. Business Session Agenda Item No. 2 for today’s June 7, 2022 City Council Meeting – Staff Report and attached  report by TXP, Inc., entitled, “The 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA.”     These reports contain substantial evidence regarding both the significant economic benefits to the City from short‐term  vacation rentals and the very low rate of complaints about STVRs in tourist commercial zones and other areas exempt  from the City’s ban on new STVR permits.     3 Please let me know if you would like me to download and resubmit these documents, or if this email is sufficient to have  these documents included in the administrative record for the Coral Mountain Resort project.      Thank you for your assistance!     Regards,      Jim           James D. Vaughn, Esq.  Stowell, Zeilenga, Ruth, Vaughn & Treiger LLP  jvaughn@szrlaw.com l www.szrlaw.com  Office: 805.446.1496 l Direct: 805.446.7609 l Mobile 805.551.0688    4695 MacArthur Court 4590 East Thousand Oaks Blvd.   Suite 200 Suite 100  Newport Beach, CA 92660 Westlake Village, California 91362     From: John Gamlin <jgamlin@coralmountain.com>   Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 8:55 PM  To: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>  Cc: Nicole Criste <ncriste@terranovaplanning.com>; Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; James Vaughn  <JVaughn@szrlaw.com>  Subject: CM PPT Presentation      Hi Monika,     Sorry to do this…I have been running the PPT over and over preparing for tomorrow and the dang embedded MP4  movie file freezes and skips for some reason.     I replaced the file in this updated version:     https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/fg8uykste5a1fyef600ib/CoralMtn_PPT_CC6.07.22_FINAL_v.2_UPDATED.pptx?dl=0&rlk ey=w6ihoub9xgu3znboxk74t7gmg      We also had a few minor, but important changes to our Rebuttal slides:     https://www.dropbox.com/s/98j3c83w74atfpm/Vaughn%20Rebuttal%20Slides.pdf%20‐%206‐7‐ 22%20City%20Council_JG_REVISED.pdf?dl=0     Would you be so kind as to DELETE the PPT file you currently have and replace it with the version above?     Same for the Rebuttal slides.     Thanks, and apologies again for the inconvenience.  4 See you tomorrow!  JG  City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: June 7, 2022 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT, PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 9212, ASSESSING THE FISCAL, ECONOMIC, AND RELATED IMPACTS OF THE INITIATIVE MEASURE ENTITLED “PHASE-OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON-HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,” BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file report, prepared pursuant to California Elections Code section 9212, assessing the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the initiative measure entitled “Phase-Out and Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted Short-Term Vacation Rentals in Non-Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta,” by December 31, 2024. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Notice of Intention to circulate an initiative petition proposing the “Phase-Out and Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted Short-Term Vacation Rentals in Non-Exempt Areas in the City of La Quinta” (Initiative), by December 31, 2024, was filed with the City on January 12, 2022. On March 15, 2022, as authorized and pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, the Council ordered a report to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative. On May 24, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official received the economic report, included as Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT – None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On January 12, 2022, a Notice of Intention to circulate the Initiative was filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official pursuant to Elections Code section 9202. BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 229 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda On March 15, 2022, as authorized and pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, the Council ordered a report to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative. Staff contacted five (5) firms – Pannel Kerr Forster in Houston, TX, TXP Economic and Public Consulting in Austin, TX (TXP), Development Management Group in Palm Desert, CA, Dan Runyan Associates in Portland, OR, and Tourism Economics in Wayne, PA. TXP was selected to prepare the economic report. On May 24, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official received the report, entitled “The 2021 Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA,” included as Attachment 1, which notes that in 2020, La Quinta accounted for approximately 17% of the total STVR direct regional lodging spending. The report further analyzed 2021 STVR data across La Quinta and its economic impacts on the local economy, and outlines several key points, including: The vast majority of local STVR activity in La Quinta supports Group travel, i.e., families and friends. Studios and one-bedroom STVR accommodations, are excluded from the analysis, assuming this type of lodging can be accommodated by hotels; (one-bedroom lodging in La Quinta accounted for 12.2% of available room-nights, and only 5% of the total local STVR lodging revenue during 2021). The report takes into account that approximately 62% of the owners of permitted STVRs in La Quinta reside out of the area. For out of town owners, about 20% of total lodging revenue remains in the area to pay for management and maintenance. As a result, the total net impact of lodging revenue is reduced by about half. In addition to lodging spending, visitors who stay in STVRs also spend money on food and beverage, entertainment, shopping, local transportation, etc. Taken together with lodging, this direct spending injected $145.5 million into the local economy in 2021. The direct spending above translates into a total economic impact (including ripple effects) of $203.8 million in annual spending, and just under 1,300 full-time, permanent jobs, of which up to 80% is subject to be lost due to the proposed STVR ban. 230 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Assuming 2021 travel activities remained constant, the annual tax revenues would be reduced by $6.1 million: o STVRs in permit ban areas account for approximately 80% of the $5.9 million transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues collected by the City in 2021. Since STVRs in exempt areas would remain (or 20% of STVRs), the net annual TOT loss is estimated to be $4.7 million. o Local sales tax economic impacts are estimated at $28.8 million in Retail Trade and $42 million in food services, for a total of $70.8 million; assuming Measure G applies to all activity, the total impact is approximately $1.4 million in annual sales tax revenue loss. ALTERNATIVES As Council ordered this report, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1.The 2021 Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA prepared by TXP Economics. 231 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda 232 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda The 2021 Economic Impact of   Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA  Prepared for  by   TXP, Inc.  Austin, Texas   (512)328‐8300 www.txp.com ATTACHMENT 1 233 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 1 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Summary  The popularity of short‐term vacation rentals (STRs) has surged in almost all  communities in the United States, especially during the COVID‐19 pandemic.  STRs  expand the lodging options available to travelers, allowing greater consumer choice as  to the range and nature of travel accommodations.  However, this growth has not come  without concerns, as many in residential neighborhoods view STRs as an inappropriate  commercial activity in parts of the community reserved for non‐commercial uses. In  order to inform this overall discussion, TXP has been tasked with evaluating the  economic impact of STRs on La Quinta.  The 2021 economic impact of STRs in La Quinta was calculated as follows. First,  aggregate direct accommodations spending of visitors using STRs with at least two  bedrooms totaled $116.2 million last year.1  Next, this figure was used to calculate STR  guest spending on other tourism purchases, such as entertainment and food. The result  was total direct spending attributable to STRs of $203.2 million. However, much of the  lodging revenue paid flows to STR operators who live outside the area. Using data on  STR registration from the City, local STR lodging revenue is reduced by about half, to  $58.5 million, putting the total net injection last year at $145.5 million. This injection by  STR guests in La Quinta yielded a total impact in Riverside County of $203.8 million in  economic activity, value‐added of $126.3 million, $47.0 million in annual earnings,  1,271 full‐time, permanent jobs, and about $6.1 million in annual City tax revenue.  STRs bring economic and fiscal benefits to La Quinta that will be lost, at least to some  degree, if they are substantially reduced. By limiting legal STR operations to restricted  areas some of the benefits will be retained. However, the economic impact of the  transition to this narrower allowable zone of activity will be significant. Typically, bans  do not eliminate unwanted STR activity, but removal of oversight and tax collection  means they do eliminate most of the benefit to local taxpayers while increasing  municipal costs. These unintended consequences, as well as the potential losses, should  be carefully considered.  1 Data was provided by AllTheRooms. Note:2+ bedrooms is used as a means of controlling for those who might easily  come and stay in a hotel if STRs were not available.  234 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 2 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Overview  The popularity of short‐term vacation rentals (STRs) has surged in almost all  communities in the United States, especially during the COVID‐19 pandemic.  STRs  expand the lodging options available to travelers, allowing greater consumer choice as  to the range and nature of travel accommodations.  However, this growth has not come  without concerns, as many in residential neighborhoods view STRs as an inappropriate  commercial activity in parts of the community reserved for non‐commercial uses.  This  certainly appears to be the case in La Quinta, CA, where a group has organized to  propose a ballot initiative to eliminate STRs from residential neighborhoods in the city.   Entitled “Phase‐Out and Permanent Ban of Non‐Hosted Short‐Term Vacation Rentals in  Non‐Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta,” the petition is the culmination of years of  evolving local STR regulations attempting to address resident concerns (typically related  to noise, trash, parking, and density) while accommodating the tourist activity and  associated economic and local tax revenue impacts that come with STR visitors.   In order to inform this overall discussion, TXP has been tasked with evaluating the  economic impact of STRs on La Quinta.  As context, a brief overview of regional tourism  is provided, including data on overall tourism trends.  The analysis then estimates the  direct injection into the local economy from visitors who stay in STRs using information  on local STR spending combined with local research on additional direct tourist  spending. This information is then used as inputs into the RIMS II input‐output model of  the Riverside County economy maintained by the Us Bureau of Economic Analysis (a  division of the Census Bureau) to estimate the secondary economic impacts.2  TXP then  estimates the local tax revenue impacts, using the direct spending and economic impact  results as the base, and concludes the report with the overall findings.    .  La Quinta STR Tourism  Context  The travel and tourism industry is a foundational element of the Coachella Valley  economy, as visitors spend billions annually in the region. While the COVID‐19  pandemic obviously hampered travel to the area the impact remains significant.   According to a study done by Tourism Economics for Visit Palm Springs:  An estimated 8.6 million visitors spent $3.6 billion in the Coachella Valley in  Calendar Year (CY) 2020. This direct spending generated total gross output  (business sales) of $4.5 billion, more than 33,000 jobs, $1.1 billion in income  earned in the region, and $428 million in state and local tax revenues.   2 See https://apps.bea.gov/regional/rims/rimsii/  235 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 3 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Tourism Economics has also examined the specific regional impact of STRs in the same  period. According to a separate study done for the same client:  A significant share of visitors to the Coachella Valley stay in short‐term vacation  rentals (STVRs), and their spending drives local jobs and income. Just under 1.0  million visitors staying in STVR accommodations accounted for 12% of total  volume, and their $564 million in spending accounted for 16% of total visitor  spending in the region in (CY) 2020. An estimated $22.1 million in Transient  Occupancy Tax (TOT) driven by STVRs accounted for 28.6% of total TOT in the  region.  This study addresses the impact of STRs by moving the analysis forward to 2021 and  narrowing the scope to STRs that are located in the City of La Quinta.  In addition, the  analysis is limited to STRs that offer at least two bedrooms on property.3 One issue that  often arises in considering the impact of STRs is the question of substitution: if STRs  were not available, would travelers simply choose to stay in hotels instead? It could be  argued that hotel lodging serves the same market as studios and one‐bedrooms, but  two or more bedrooms is clearly focused on group travel, which is not as easily  accommodated with traditional lodging options.  Trends in the Lodging Sector  Money to spend and a desire to spend it have driven the resurgence of travel and  tourism in the Greater Palm Springs area post‐pandemic.  As the impact of COVID‐19  has receded, overall hotel occupancy has returned to close to pre‐pandemic levels.   Meanwhile, lodging revenue is surging, driven by a combination of demand (including  capacity to pay) and inflation. Most other financial measures track the trend in total  lodging revenue, as revenue per available room (RevPAR) and the average daily rate  were above pre‐pandemic levels in February. On the workforce side, the local  accommodation job base has yet to fully recover, though there likely are other factors  (such as declining labor force participation) at work. The impact of the pandemic  obviously was severe, but recent indicators suggest that local travel activity (at least as  of February 2022) was largely back to pre‐pandemic levels.   3 Note: The proposed permit ban area does not include any meaningful number of studio/one‐bedroom  units. 236 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 4 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Figures in this Section are Based on Data from the Month of February Each Year  Hotel data does not include STRs  Figure 1   Hotel Occupancy in Greater Palm Springs  Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc.   Figure 2  Total Monthly Hotel Lodging Revenue ($Millions)  Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc.   237 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 5 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Figure 3   Hotel Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR)  Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc.   Figure 4  Hotel Average Daily Rate (ADR)  Source: Smith Travel (www.str.com); TXP, Inc.   238 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 6 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Short Term Rentals in La Quinta  As previously indicated, vacation rental properties have been part of the  accommodations market for decades in some of California’s most popular tourism  destinations, including La Quinta. When evaluating the economic impact, the focus  should be on net new activity – in other words, activity that would not otherwise occur  in La Quinta/Riverside County absent STRs. As discussed above, narrowing the analysis  to how much was spent overall by visitors who stay in STRs that offer at least two  bedrooms on property advances this goal and is a reasonable proxy; while it is true that  some intended to visit and stay in a property that offered 2+ bedrooms would come  anyway if that option were not available, it is also true that some visitors who came and  stayed in a studio/one‐bedroom STR would not have chosen another lodging option  absent STR availability.  Table 1: Direct STR 2‐Bedroom+ Visitor Indicators in La Quinta   Available Room‐Nights Room‐Nights Gross Revenues RevPAN  2019 2,339,419 178,880 $71,198,197 $398.02  2020 2,076,519 210,676 $92,410,922 $438.64  2021 1,973,016 223,598 $116,166,717 $519.53  Sources: AllTheRooms (https://www.alltherooms.com/analytics); TXP, Inc. Note: “Room‐nights” in this  context refers to the number of bedrooms available, eg, a 3‐bedroom property would have 3 room‐nights  available for a given date.   Economic Impact Calculations  The 2021 economic impact of STRs in La Quinta was calculated as follows. First,  aggregate direct accommodations spending of visitors using STRs with at least two  bedrooms totaled $116.2 million being spent last year.4  Next, this spending figure was  used as the basis of calculating the STR guest spending on other tourism purchase  categories, such as entertainment and food.5 In other words, for every dollar spent on  lodging at an STR, a traveler might spend a slightly greater aggregate amount on food  and beverage. The result was total direct spending attributable to STRs of $203.2  million last year.  All visitor STR lodging spending does not enter the local economy, as the City of La  Quinta reports that 62 percent of the permitted STRs in the community are registered  to those who live outside the area.  Given this, the assumption is that only the  remaining 38 percent (reflecting local ownership) remains in the local economy.  4 Data was provided by AllTheRooms.  5TXP typically uses data from the Tourism Satellite Accounts produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis as the basis of  this ancillary direct spending estimate.  However, Tourism Economics published 2020 estimates of STR related ancillary  spending in the local market, which reflects, at least in part, local primary research.  These ratios likely are more attuned  to the situation locally and are consistent with findings elsewhere.  239 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 7 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  However, even those operators who reside outside the area must service and maintain  the property, which is assumed to cost the equivalent of 20 percent of total lodging  revenue (to cover costs such as property management, repairs, compliance/overhead,  and capital improvements). The net impact is that the $116.2 million lodging figure is  reduced by about half ($57.7 million), to $58.5 million, putting the total direct injection  into the local economy at $145.5 million ($203.2 million minus $57.7 million).  Figure 5: 2021 Estimated Direct STR Visitor Spending by Category ($millions)  Source: Tourism Economics, DK Shiflett, TXP, Inc.  To put these figures in context, AllTheRooms reports La Quinta STR direct spending of  $95.1 million during 2020 (including studios/one‐bedrooms). Tourism Economics  reported total STR visitor spending in the region that same year of $564 million,  meaning La Quinta accounts for just under 17 percent of the regional total. This direct  spending was used to estimate the ripple effects, i.e., the induced and indirect impacts,  with the total economic impact the combination of all three.   Colored pie slices represent local  direct STR‐related spending:  $145.5 million total  240 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 8 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Economic Impact Methodology  The second step in the process is to translate the direct impact into the total economic  impact through an input‐output model of the Riverside County economy that allows  measurement of the secondary, or “ripple” effects.  Economists use a number of  statistics to describe regional economic activity. Four common measures are:   Output (also known as Economic Activity and equivalent to top‐line revenue), which describes total economic activity and is equivalent to a firm’s gross sales or top‐line; Value Added which equals gross output of an industry or a sector less its intermediate inputs or purchases from other firms used in the production process; Labor Income which corresponds to wages and benefits; and Employment which refers to jobs that have been created in the local economy. The economic impacts extend beyond the direct activity outlined above.  In an input‐ output analysis of new economic activity, it is useful to distinguish three types of  expenditure effects: direct, indirect, and induced.    Direct effects are production changes associated with the immediate effects or final demand changes.  The payments made by a visitor to a STR operator or taxi driver are examples of a direct effect. Indirect effects are production changes in backward‐linked industries caused by the changing input needs of directly affected industries – typically, additional purchases to produce additional output.  Satisfying the demand for an overnight stay will require the STR operator to purchase additional cleaning supplies and services, for example, and the taxi driver will have to replace the gasoline consumed during the trip from the airport.  These downstream purchases affect the economic status of other local merchants and workers. Induced effects are the changes in regional household spending patterns caused by changes in household income generated from the direct and indirect effects.  Both the STR operator and taxi driver experience increased income from the visitor’s stay, for example, as do the cleaning supplies outlet and the gas station proprietor.  Induced effects capture the way in which this increased income is spent in the local economy. Figure 8: The Flow of Economic Impacts  Direct +Indirect +Induced =Total 241 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 9 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Economic Impact Results  The direct spending by STR guests in La Quinta during 2021 yielded a total impact in  Riverside County of $203.8 million in economic activity, value‐added of just over $126  million, $47.0 million in annual earnings, and about 1,271 full‐time, permanent jobs. It  should be noted that these results are reported by county since visitors who come to  stay at a STR in La Quinta likely will spend money elsewhere in the region; by the same  token, some workers employed at La Quinta‐based establishments may live in other  local communities. However, most non‐accommodation spending usually occurs near  where visitors are staying, which suggests largely within the city limits of La Quinta.   The table that follows details the total impacts detailed by industry sector. As would be  expected, the lion’s share of the activity tends to be found in consumer‐driven  segments of the economy such as food services, retail trade, and arts & entertainment.   Of note is the fact that applicable direct STR lodging spending is allocated to the  property management/real estate sector, rather than the accommodations sector,  since revenue flows to private homeowners.     Figure 9: Total 2021 La Quinta STR Economic Impact ($millions)  Output Value‐Added Earnings Jobs  Agriculture, etc. $0.4 $0.2 $0.1 2  Mining NA NA NA NA Utilities                $4.0 $2.3 $0.4 2  Construction $3.3 $1.6 $0.9 12  Durable Manufacturing $2.5 $1.0 $0.4 6  Non‐Durable Manufacturing   $4.5 $1.4 $0.5 9  Wholesale Trade            $4.5 $2.8 $0.8 9  Retail Trade $28.8 $16.6 $7.4 203  Transportation & Warehousing  $6.3 $2.7 $1.5 50  Information        $2.6 $1.4 $0.4 4  Finance & Insurance               $3.2 $2.0 $0.7 7  Real Estate  $59.1 $40.9 $7.1 191  Professional Services               $3.3 $2.4 $1.3 16  Management of Firms $1.1 $0.7 $0.2 2  Administrative & Waste Services      $10.2 $13.7 $7.6 153  Educational Services $1.0 $0.7 $0.4 9  Health Services $6.3 $4.1 $2.2 39  Arts/Entertainment/Recreation        $16.0 $8.6 $4.3 140  Accommodation  $1.0 $0.7 $0.3 6  Food Services     $42.0 $20.4 $9.7 385  Other Services $3.6 $2.1 $1.0 21  Households NA NA NA 3  Total Annual  $203.8 $126.3 $47.0 1,271  Source: TXP, Inc.  242 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 10 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Tax Revenue Impact  Further benefits accrue to state and local governments in the form of taxes  assessed on direct spending by STR guests, as well as revenues generated by the  ripple effects of that spending. Tourism tends to generate a high proportion of  tax revenue compared to other industries. Most goods and services purchased by  visitors are taxed, and many at a higher rate than other goods. There are three  main areas where the City of La Quinta realizes tax revenue from STR activity:  property taxes, lodging taxes, and sales taxes.  Taxes on real property will be  assessed independent (at least in the short‐term) of usage, meaning the owner of  a home will have to pay property taxes whether it is being occupied as a  residence or used as an STR. In a time of historically low interest rates and limited  housing supply, there is no indication that homes being used as STRs appraise at a  higher level for tax purposes than comparable properties that are occupied as  residences.  This situation could change as interest rates rise and supply increases  (which combined would tend to lower residential property values) but the  conservative approach is to ascribe no new net property tax revenue to STRs.     The City of La Quinta reports Transient Occupancy Tax related to STRs for 2021 at  $5.9 million, which, at a ten percent tax rate, implies STR lodging revenue of  about $59 million. This is the current total TOT collected.  However, the City  reports units in areas that fall under the proposed ban represent 80 percent of  current revenue.  The assumption, therefore, is that 20 percent would remain,  putting the net annual TOT loss $4.7 million.  Local sales tax is assessed at one percent on most transactions involving tangible  goods (with exceptions made for items such as groceries for home consumption)  and most services untaxed, with Measure G adding an additional one percent The  economic impact results show top‐line revenue (output) impacts of $28.8 million  in Retail Trade and $42.0 million in Food Services, for a total of $70.8 million.  Assuming the local sales tax rate applies to all of that activity, the impact is just  over $1.4 million in annual sales tax revenue, putting the total potential annual  loss at $6.1 million.  243 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 11 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Conclusions STRs have been an important (and, as measured by dollars, growing) part of La Quinta’s  tourism industry, especially given its role as a smaller market that caters to leisure  travelers. Group travel is a significant component of the broader leisure category and  comprises the vast majority of local STR activity in La Quinta, as studio/one‐bedroom  STRs accounted for only 12.2 percent of the room‐nights and 5.0 percent of the total  local STR lodging revenue during 2021.  As this data indicates, STRs in La Quinta serve a  specific market ‐ the casual leisure group traveler. This traveler typically is interested in  lodging options not fully satisfied by more traditional choices, a point especially  emphasized during the pandemic. As a result, a region’s overall travel and tourism  industry activity, and the resulting local economic impact, today more than ever is  increased by including STRs in the available lodging options.   That having been said, benefits are maximized by appropriately addressing concerns.   Tourism Economics put it well in their study of regional STRs:  By monitoring the visitor economy and STR segment of the market, local  policymakers can inform decisions regarding the funding and prioritization of the  sector’s development and also craft balanced and effective local regulations. They  can also carefully monitor its successes and future needs. This is true for  municipalities in the Coachella Valley, as the visitor economy has been severely  affected by the COVID‐19 pandemic, and as STRs are increasingly utilized by  visitors to the region.  In sum, STRs bring economic and fiscal benefits to La Quinta that will be lost, at  least to some degree, if they are substantially reduced. By limiting legal STR  operations to restricted areas such as those proposed in the petition some of the  benefits will be retained. However, the economic impact of the transition to this  narrower allowable zone of activity will be significant, at least until new product  can be brought to market to replace what has been removed via the regulatory  ban.  Moreover, bans typically do not eliminate unwanted STR activity, but  removal of oversight and tax collection means they do eliminate most of the  benefit to local taxpayers while increasing municipal costs. These unintended  consequences, as well as the potential losses, should be carefully considered.  244 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda ` 12 2021 Economic Impact of Short‐Term Rentals in La Quinta, CA | Spring 2022  Legal Disclaimer  TXP reserves the right to make changes, corrections and/or improvements at any time  and without notice. In addition, TXP disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred  directly or indirectly as a result of errors, omissions, or discrepancies. TXP disclaims any  liability due to errors, omissions or discrepancies made by third parties whose material  TXP relied on in good faith to produce the report.  Any statements involving matters of opinion or estimates, whether or not so expressly  stated, are set forth as such and not as representations of fact, and no representation is  made that such opinions or estimates will be realized. The information and expressions  of opinion contained herein are subject to change without notice, and shall not, under  any circumstances, create any implications that there has been no change or updates.  245 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda 246 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: June 7, 2022 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS: (A) ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE PROPOSING THE “PHASE-OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON-HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,” BY DECEMBER 31, 2024, AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (B) SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF THE SAME (C) REQUESTING RIVERSIDE COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE THE ELECTION FOR THE INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE WITH THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION AND STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 RECOMMENDATION A. Adopt a resolution ordering the submission to the qualified electors of the City an initiative ordinance and corresponding ballot measure proposing the “Phase-Out and Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted Short-Term Vacation Rentals in Non-Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta,” by December 31, 2024, at the General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022. B. Adopt a resolution setting priority for filing written arguments and providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments regarding the initiative ordinance and corresponding ballot measure; and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis for the same. C. Adopt a resolution requesting that the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County consolidate the election for this initiative ordinance and corresponding ballot measure with the General Municipal Election and Statewide General Election, to be held on November 8, 2022. BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 247 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • A Notice of Intention to circulate an initiative petition proposing the “Phase- Out and Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted Short-Term Vacation Rentals in Non- Exempt Areas in the City of La Quinta” (Initiative), by December 31, 2024, was filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official on January 12, 2022. • On March 15, 2022, as authorized and pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, the Council ordered a report to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative. • On April 21, 2022, the proponents filed petitions regarding the Initiative, which were submitted to the Riverside County Registrar of Voters (ROV) for full signature verification on April 26, 2022. • On May 3, 2022, Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2022-009 and 2022-010 calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the election of certain officers and requesting the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County (BOS) to consolidate this election with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date. • On May 24, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official received the final report ordered pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, scheduled for Council’s consideration on June 7, 2022. • On June 3, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official received the results of the signature verification conducted by the ROV, which established that a sufficient number of signatures were verified to qualify the Initiative to be placed on the ballot, and the ROV prepared a Certificate of Sufficiency of the Initiative scheduled for Council’s consideration on June 7, 2022. • Proposed are resolutions to (A) submit to the City’s qualified electors the Initiative at the next General Municipal Election, to be held on November 8, 2022; (B) set priorities for filing written arguments and rebuttal arguments, and direct the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis regarding the Initiative; and (C) request the BOS consolidate the Initiative election with the General Municipal Election and Statewide General Election, to be held on November 8, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for consolidated election services for this Initiative with the ROV for the November 8, 2022, election, of $40,000 will be budgeted in City Clerk Professional 248 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Services Account No. 101-1005-60103 for fiscal year 2022/23. Variables affecting the final amount include the number of jurisdictions that participate, the final number of registered voters receiving pamphlets, the number of measures added to the pamphlet, providing vote-by-mail ballots to all registered voters, and increases to postage, paper, gas, vendor, and staff costs. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On January 12, 2022, a Notice of Intention to circulate the Initiative was filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official pursuant to Elections Code section 9202. On January 27, 2022, the City Attorney prepared an official ballot title and summary for the Initiative for use by the proponents for publication and circulation of a petition, which was provided to the proponents by the City Clerk/Elections Official on the same day, in accordance with Elections Code section 9203. On February 2, 2022, the proponents filed with the City Clerk/Elections Official the publication affidavit as required by Elections Code section 9206 and began circulating the petition. On February 2, 2022, the City Clerk/Elections Official contacted the ROV and determined the number of registered voters in the City of La Quinta was 24,487; and as of the ROV’s last report to the Secretary of State (SoS) pursuant to Elections Code section 2187, dated January 13, 2022, and in effect on February 2, 2022, the number of registered voters in the City of La Quinta was 24,392. The Initiative petition must be signed by not less than 10% of the registered voters in the City in order to qualify for the ballot (Elections Code section 9215). On April 21, 2022, the proponents filed the petition with the City Clerk/Elections Official pursuant to Elections Code section 9210, which was submitted to the ROV on April 26, 2022, for full signature verification (Elections Code section 9211). The results of the signature verification conducted by the ROV established that all of the 3,667 signatures submitted on the petition were examined, of which 3,244 were found to be sufficient, which is in excess of the minimum number of signatures required to qualify the Initiative to be placed on the ballot at a regular election pursuant to Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405; and on June 3, 2022, the ROV issued the Certificate of Sufficiency. In accordance with Elections Code sections 9211 and 9114, if the petition is found sufficient, the City Clerk/Elections Official shall certify the results of the examination to the City Council at the next regular meeting, scheduled for June 7, 2022. 249 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda In accordance with Elections Code section 9212, the Council ordered a report to assess the fiscal, economic, and related impacts of the Initiative, if it were to qualify for the ballot and be adopted by the voters. The City Clerk/Elections Official received the final report on May 24,2022. The presentation to the Council and consideration of that report is a separate agenda item for this regular meeting. On May 3, 2022, Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2022-009 and 2022-010 calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the election of certain officers and requesting the BOS to consolidate this election with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date. Proposed are resolutions to: (A) Submit to the City’s qualified electors the Initiative at the next General Municipal Election, to be held on November 8, 2022, so as to comply with Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405. (B) Set priorities for filing written arguments and rebuttal arguments, and direct the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis regarding the Initiative. Arguments and rebuttals are governed by Elections Code sections 9282- 9287. For measures placed on the ballot by petition like the Initiative, the persons filing the Initiative may file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the Council may submit an argument against it (Elections Code section 9282). Arguments must be 300 words or less, and rebuttals must be 250 words or less. Because the General Municipal Election will be consolidated with the Statewide General Election, the ROV has provided the following deadlines by which arguments and rebuttals are due, listed in the ROV’s General Municipal Election Calendar – November 8, 2022, included as Attachment 1: • August 22, 2022 – last day to file arguments • August 23 – September 1, 2022 – public examination period • September 1, 2022 – last day to file rebuttals to arguments 250 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda The impartial analysis is governed by Elections Code section 9280. The City Attorney is required to show the effect of the Initiative on existing law and the operation of the Initiative if adopted. The impartial analysis must be 500 words or less and will be printed preceding the arguments for and against the measure in the ballot pamphlet. (C) Request the BOS to consolidate the Initiative election with the General Municipal Election and Statewide General Election, to be held on November 8, 2022. ALTERNATIVE Council may elect to adopt the initiative ordinance, without alteration, on the day the certification of the petition is presented, or within 10 days after it is presented. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk/Elections Official Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. ROV General Municipal Election Calendar – November 8, 2022 251 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda 252 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda RESOLUTION NO. 2022 – XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE PROPOSING THE “PHASE- OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON-HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA” AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, AS CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2022 – 009 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of California and the City of La Quinta, a General Municipal Election has been called to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-009, adopted on May 3, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405 hereby authorizes to submit to the voters of the City of La Quinta at that General Municipal Election an initiative ordinance and ballot measure proposing the “phase-out and permanent ban of non-hosted short-term vacation rentals in non-exempt areas of the City of La Quinta” by December 31, 2024. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council, pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405, hereby orders to be submitted to the voters of the City of La Quinta at the General Municipal Election the following ballot question for the initiative ordinance and ballot measure, known as the “Phase-Out and Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted Short-Term Vacation Rentals in Non-Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta” by December 31, 2024: Shall the measure, proposing to phase-out and permanently ban “non-hosted short- term vacation rentals,” as defined, in non- exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by December 31, 2024, be adopted? YES NO 253 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Calling Election – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 2 of 8 SECTION 2. The complete text of the initiative ordinance to be submitted to the voters is attached hereto as Exhibit A, as written by the proponents. The title of the initiative ordinance shall be known as and may be cited as “Phase- Out and Permanent Ban of Non-Hosted Short-Term Vacation Rentals in Non- Exempt Areas of the City of La Quinta.” SECTION 3. The initiative ordinance and accompanying ballot measure submitted to the voters of the City of La Quinta pursuant to Section 1 of this resolution shall not be adopted unless a simple majority (50% plus at least 1 vote) of the City’s voters voting on this ballot measure vote “yes.” SECTION 4. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. SECTION 5. Notice of the time and place holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and submit such to the Registrar of Voters for the County of Riverside. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Quinta held this ____ day of _______, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 254 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Calling Election – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 3 of 8 ATTEST: ___________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 255 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Calling Election – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 4 of 8 INITIATIVE ORDINANCE TEXT OF INITIATIVE BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE SHALL BE AMENDED TO PHASE-OUT NON-HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 WHEREAS, Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code relates to short-term vacation rentals (STVRs); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City of La Quinta (“City”) by Article XI, Sections 5 and 7 of the California Constitution and the City Charter, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land, property and businesses within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, welfare, and safety; and WHEREAS, the people of La Quinta have repeatedly expressed objections to their City Council regarding the proliferation and density of non- hosted STVRs in residential neighborhoods due to the negative impact on their quality of life, and the character and livability of their neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the detrimental impacts of non-hosted STVRs on residential neighborhoods has not been adequately mitigated by the City Council resulting in ongoing interruption to residents’ peaceful enjoyment of their homes and forcing residents to police continuous STVR issues such as excessive noise, disorderly conduct, overcrowding, traffic, parking, and trash; and WHEREAS, STVRs are a commercial use of residential dwellings, generating income based on the short-term rental of residential dwellings akin to other commercial uses banned in residential neighborhoods, and the people of La Quinta have determined that the public nuisances created by non-hosted STVR commercial activities in residential neighborhoods is incompatible with surrounding residential uses; and WHEREAS, the proliferation of non-hosted STVRs in residential neighborhoods has depleted the availability of housing for new homeowners and long-term tenants who contribute to the fabric of the community, spend their earnings locally, populate the school district, and operate local businesses or provide labor to local businesses; and EXHIBIT A 256 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Calling Election – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 5 of 8 WHEREAS, this initiative phases out all types of non-hosted STVRs including general STVRs and primary residence STVRs, in all residential dwelling units in the City not exempted by the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) below, by December 31, 2024, including residential dwelling units governed by homeowners’ associations (HOAs) and covenants, conditions & restrictions (CC&Rs), but shall have no effect on hosted homeshare STVRs, vacation rentals exempted by the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) below, or bed and breakfast operations; and WHEREAS, the people of La Quinta acknowledge the importance of tourism to the La Quinta economy and call for the expansion of STVR units in exempt areas that meet the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) below; and WHEREAS, the people of La Quinta shall provide a phase-out period to minimize the economic impacts to existing non-hosted STVR permit holders but shall prohibit the issuance of any new non-hosted STVR permits in residential neighborhoods (not exempted by the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) below) as of the effective date of this Initiative. NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ITEM 1: Section 3.25.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code shall be amended to add the following definition: “Non-hosted short-term vacation rental” is a type of short-term vacation rental whereby the owner rents a short-term vacation rental unit (as defined herein), for compensation, for periods of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, while the owner does not live on-site or in the dwelling unit, throughout the occupant's stay. ITEM 2: Section 3.25.055 of the La Quinta Municipal Code shall be deleted in its entirety and the following shall be added in its place: 3.25.055 - non-issuance of new non-hosted short-term vacation rental permits and phase-out of existing non-hosted short-term vacation permits. A. Commencing on the effective date of this Initiative, there shall be no processing of, or issuance for, any applications for a new non-hosted short- term vacation rental permit, required by this chapter to use or operate a non- hosted short-term vacation rental unit in the city, except applications for a new non-hosted short-term vacation rental permit covering a non-hosted short-term vacation rental unit that meets one (1) or more of the following: 257 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Calling Election – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 6 of 8 1. A residential dwelling within a residential project located in the CT Tourist Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.070 (or successor section) of this code and depicted in the city's official zoning map. 2. A residential dwelling within a residential project located in the VC Village Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.100 (or successor section) of this code and depicted in the city's official zoning map. 3. A residential dwelling within a residential project subject to a development agreement with the city, or subject to a condition of approval(s) attached to any entitlement approved by the city (including but not limited to a specific plan, subdivision map, or site development permit), pursuant to which non-hosted short-term vacation rentals are a permitted use, and the residential dwelling's use as a non-hosted short-term vacation rental is authorized under a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), for the residential project. 4. A residential dwelling within the area covered by the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan. 5. A residential dwelling is located adjacent to the CT Tourist Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.070 and depicted in the city's official zoning map, and within the following boundaries; west of Avenida Obregon, south of the Avenida Fernando, east of Calle Mazatlan, and north of the driveway access between Calle Mazatlan and Avenida Obregon that serves as a southern boundary for the La Quinta Tennis Villas/Tennis Condos area identified on page 25 of the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan, 121 E— Amendment 5 (as may be subsequently amended from time to time). For purposes of this subsection, "adjacent to" means across the street from or accessible by a driveway or service road designed to provide access to area(s) within the CT Tourist Commercial District zone. B. The city manager or authorized designee shall have the authority to implement policies or procedures to review and verify whether an application for a new short-term vacation rental permit meets the criteria set forth in this section. C. Until the expiration date of all non-hosted short-term vacation rental permits (not exempted by Section 3.25.055(A) above) in 2024 as defined below, this section shall not apply to applications for a renewal of an existing non-hosted short-term vacation rental permit and business license, submitted in compliance with this chapter, including when the short-term vacation rental 258 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Calling Election – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 7 of 8 permit is under suspension during the time for processing the renewal application. Applications for renewals must be submitted as prescribed by this chapter, and will be issued or denied based on the criteria pursuant to this chapter. Any short-term vacation rental unit, covered by a permit that is subject to an application for renewal, which is under temporary suspension in violation of this chapter or any other provisions of this code, shall not become permitted to use the dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit until all violations that led to the temporary suspension have been remedied and the suspension has expired. Any revoked short-term vacation rental permit shall not be eligible for renewal or new short-term vacation rental permit. D. Commencing with the effective date of this Initiative, holders of non- hosted, valid short-term vacation rental permits shall continue to be eligible for renewal of their non-hosted short-term vacation rental permit however, all non-hosted short-term vacation rental permits, not exempted by Section 3.25.055(A) above, shall have an expiration date of December 31, 2024 or earlier. Beginning January 1, 2025, all permits for non-hosted short-term vacation rental units, not exempted by Section 3.25.055(A) above, shall be invalid. Commencing January 1, 2025, there shall be no non-hosted short-term vacation rental permits issued or renewed to use or operate any privately owned residential dwelling (as defined in Section 3.25.030) as a non-hosted short-term vacation rental unit unless the unit meets one or more of the provisions of Section 3.25.055(A) above, or the unit holds a valid homeshare short-term vacation rental permit. ITEM 3: EFFECTIVE DATE. This initiate shall be adopted on the date the La Quinta City Council certifies the passage of this Initiative’s ballot measure based on the election results and the effective date shall be ten (10) calendar days following that certification. ITEM 4: CONFORMING CODE PROVISIONS. Any provision of the La Quinta Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Initiative, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Initiative. ITEM 5: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Initiative or resulting ballot measure is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, then such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Initiative or ballot measure. The People of the City 259 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Calling Election – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 8 of 8 of La Quinta hereby declare they would have voted for this ballot measure, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 260 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda RESOLUTION NO. 2022 – XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS REGARDING AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE, PROPOSING THE “PHASE-OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON- HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,” AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of California and the City of La Quinta, a General Municipal Election has been called to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-009, adopted on May 3, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405, has authorized to submit to the voters of the City of La Quinta at the November 8, 2022, General Municipal Election, the following ballot question for the initiative ordinance and ballot measure, proposing to phase-out and permanent ban of non-hosted short-term vacation rentals in non-exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by December 31, 2024 (the “Measure”): Shall the measure, proposing to phase-out and permanently ban “non-hosted short- term vacation rentals,” as defined, in non- exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by December 31, 2024, be adopted? YES NO WHEREAS, Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the California Elections Code provides for the filing of written arguments and rebuttal arguments, and for the submittal of an impartial analysis by the city attorney, for ballot measures that have qualified to be presented to the voters at municipal elections. 261 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Impartial Analysis, Arguments, and Rebuttals Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 2 of 4 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9282(a), for measures placed on the ballot by petition, the persons filing the initiative petition may file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the City Council may submit an argument against the Measure. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9282(b), the City Council also authorizes the City Council collectively, or any member or members of the City Council authorized by the full Council, or any individual voter who is eligible to vote on the Measure, or bona fide association of citizens, or any combination of voters and associations, to file a written argument in Favor OR Against the Measure, accompanied by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its principal officers. The filer of a written argument may change or withdraw the argument until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk – August 22, 2022, after which no arguments for or against the Measure may be submitted to the City Clerk. No argument shall exceed 300 words in length, and no more than five signatures shall appear on any argument. SECTION 2. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9285(a), when the City Clerk has selected the arguments for and against the Measure, which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the City Clerk shall send copies of the argument in favor of the Measure to the authors of the argument against, and copies of the argument against to the authors in favor. The authors may prepare and submit rebuttal arguments not to exceed 250 words. The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, accompanied by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct arguments. On the ballot, each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut, and no more than five signatures shall appear on any rebuttal argument. SECTION 3. Any written argument or rebuttal argument filed with the City Clerk shall be accompanied by the Statement of the Author Form required by California Elections Code section 9600. The City Clerk shall provide such form upon request. SECTION 4. If more than one argument for or more than one argument against the Measure is submitted to the City Clerk within the time prescribed, 262 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Impartial Analysis, Arguments, and Rebuttals Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 3 of 4 the City Clerk shall select one of the arguments in favor and one of the arguments against the Measure for printing and distribution to the voters in accordance with the priority set forth in California Elections Code section 9287. SECTION 5. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9280, the City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the Measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the Measure, not to exceed 500 words, showing the effect of the Measure on the existing law and the operation of the Measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments for or against the Measure – August 22, 2022. The impartial analysis shall include a statement indicating whether the Measure was placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by the City Council. In the event the entire text of the Measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information guide, there shall be printed immediately below the impartial analysis, in no less than 10-font bold type, the following: “The above statement is an impartial analysis of Ordinance or Measure ___ (enter assigned Measure number here). If you desire a copy of the ordinance or measure, please call the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 777 – 7035 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you.” SECTION 6. Pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9282 and 9285, the City Clerk shall print, or cause to be printed, in the Official Sample Ballot, the entire text of the arguments for or against the Measure, and the rebuttal arguments, in uniform type, style and spacing. SECTION 7. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9295, materials related to this initiative Measure will be available for public examination for no fewer than ten (10) calendar days, from August 23 through September 1, 2022, immediately following the filing deadline for submissions of those materials, and prior to being submitted for printing in the voter information guide. The City Clerk shall post notice in the Clerk’s Office of the specific dates that the examination period will run. SECTION 8. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Quinta held this ____ day of _______, 2022, by the following vote: 263 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Impartial Analysis, Arguments, and Rebuttals Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 4 of 4 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ____________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 264 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda RESOLUTION NO. 2022 – XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATE WITH THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, AND THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE, AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA PROPOSING THE “PHASE-OUT AND PERMANENT BAN OF NON- HOSTED SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN NON-EXEMPT AREAS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA” BY DECEMBER 31, 2024 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of California and the City of La Quinta, a General Municipal Election has been called to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-009, adopted on May 3, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9215 and 1405, hereby authorizes to submit to the voters of the City of La Quinta at that General Municipal Election an initiative ordinance and accompanying ballot measure proposing the “phase-out and permanent ban of non-hosted short-term vacation rentals in non-exempt areas in the City of La Quinta,” by December 31, 2024 (the “Measure”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-010, adopted by the City Council on May 3, 2022, the City of La Quinta has requested that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date, and that within the City of La Quinta, the precincts, vote centers, polling places and election officers of the two elections, and that the election department of the County of Riverside canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election, and that the General Municipal Election and Statewide General Election be held in all respects as if there were only one election; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that, in addition to the consolidation of the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election for purposes set forth in Resolution No. 2022-010, that the Measure, identified above 265 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Consolidate Election with Riverside County – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 2 of 4 similarly be submitted to the qualified electors of the City of La Quinta at the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election, and similarly consolidated with Statewide General Election. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements in California Elections Code section 10403, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside is hereby requested, in addition to the consolidation request set forth in Resolution No. 2022-010, to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of the City of La Quinta an initiative ordinance and ballot measure proposing the “phase-out and permanent ban of non-hosted short-term vacation rentals in non-exempt areas in the City of La Quinta.” The exact form of the measure and question to be submitted to the voters at the General Municipal Election is the following: Shall the measure, proposing to phase-out and permanently ban “non-hosted short- term vacation rentals,” as defined, in non- exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by December 31, 2024, be adopted? YES NO SECTION 2. That the county election department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. SECTION 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the county elections department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election. SECTION 4. That the City of La Quinta recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the county elections department of the County of Riverside. 266 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Consolidate Election with Riverside County – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 3 of 4 SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the permanent record of resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Quinta held this ____ day of _______, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 267 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Resolution No. 2022-XXX Initiative Ordinance and Ballot Measure – Consolidate Election with Riverside County – November 8, 2022 Adopted: __________, 2022 Page 4 of 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 268 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Page 1 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) The materials contained in this calendar represent the research and opinions of the staff at the Riverside County Registrar of Voters. The contents of this calendar and any legal interpretations contained herein are not to be relied upon as being correct either factually or as a legal opinion. Reliance on the content without prior submission to and approval of your appropriate public counsel is at the reader’s risk. Please call (951) 486-7200 if you have any questions or comments or visit our website at www.voteinfo.net. Thank you. DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION July 1 (130) City Council ADOPT RESOLUTION CALLING ELECTION (E.C. §§ 330, 10002, 10403.5, 13307) By this suggested date adopt resolutions regarding the following: Ordering election including incumbents and offices to be filled. Requesting Registrar of Voters to conduct the election. Regulations whether candidates or the city will pay for candidate statements. July 4 – July 18 (127 – 113) City Clerk PUBLISH NOTICE OF ELECTION (E.C. § 12101; G.C. §§ 6060, 6061) Publish Notice of Election one time between these dates. The notice will include the date and time of the election, nomination deadline, the offices to be filled, and hours the polls will be open. The Notice is to be published in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City. Federal law requires publication to be made in English and Spanish. July 4 Registrar of Voters INDEPENDENCE DAY (CO. ORD. 358.8) The Registrar of Voters office will be closed. July 6 (125) City Council BOUNDARY CHANGES (E.C. § 12262) Last-day boundary changes may be made for this election. July 11 (120) City Council / City Clerk THE LAST DAY TO ADOPT REGULATIONS REGARDING CANDIDATE STATEMENTS (E.C. § 13307) Last day for a local agency to adopt or amend regulations regarding charges for printing a candidate’s statement. July 15 (116) Registrar of Voters PRECINCT SECTION TO COMPLETE BOUNDARY CHANGES No later than this date, the precinct section must complete boundary changes. July 18 – August 12 (113 – 88) Candidates / City Clerk NOMINATION PERIOD (E.C. §§ 10220, 10224, 13107, 13307, 13309, 13311; G.C. §§ 36503, 87201 et seq.) Between these dates, candidates may obtain and file nomination papers with the City Clerk during normal business hours as posted. The Ballot Designation Worksheet must be filed at the same time as the Declaration of Candidacy. Candidate statements must be filed at the same time nomination petitions are filed. Statements are confidential until the deadline for filing has passed. Statement of Economic Interest must be filed by the final filing date. ATTACHMENT 1 269 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Page 2 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION July 18 – August 12 (113 – 88) Candidates / City Clerk CODE OF FAIR CAMPAIGN PRACTICES (E.C. § 20400 et seq.) At the time a candidate is issued nomination papers each candidate will be issued a Code of Fair Campaign Practices. Filing it is voluntary and it may be filed any time before the election. It is available for public inspection until 30 days after the election. July 18 – August 12 (113 – 88) Candidates / City Clerk STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST (G.C. §§ 87200 et seq.) A Statement of Economic Interests must be filed for all candidates by the close of the nomination period. August 12 (88) Candidates / City Clerk LAST DAY TO FILE NOMINATION PAPERS AND/OR WITHDRAW (E.C. § 10220 et seq.; G.C. § 87207 et seq.) Nomination papers and candidate statements must be filed no later than this date. Candidates may withdraw their nomination until the close of the nomination period. PUBLIC EXAMINATION PERIOD (E.C. § 13313) There will be a 10-day examination period for Candidate Statements filed from August 13 through August 22. August 12 (88) City Clerk ORDINANCE/MEASURE (E.C. §§ 9222, 9223, 13247) Last day for a copy of the ordinance or measure to be submitted to the Registrar of Voters if a measure is to be included on the ballot. A copy shall be made available to any voter. The statement of all measures submitted to the voters shall be abbreviated on the ballot. The statement shall contain not more than 75 words for each measure to be voted on. August 12 (88) City Clerk PUBLISH NOTICE OF ELECTION (E.C. §12111; G.C. §§ 6060, 6061) The City Clerk shall publish a notice of election as soon as possible pursuant to section 12111 of the California Elections Code. A synopsis of the measure(s) shall be included in the publication. Government Code § 6061 requires the notice to be published once. The last day to submit arguments to the City Clerk should also be included in the notice. The City Clerk shall consolidate the notice of election and the notice of measure to be voted on into one notice if the measure was placed on the ballot before the notice of election is published. August 15 (85) Candidates / City Clerk LAST DAY TO WITHDRAW CANDIDATE STATEMENTS (E.C. § 13307) The last day to withdraw candidate statements unless there is an extension of the nomination period. Withdrawal of candidate statements must be in writing to the City Clerk. 270 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Page 3 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION August 17 (83) Candidates / City Clerk EXTENSION OF NOMINATION PERIOD (E.C. § 10225) If nomination papers for an incumbent officer of the city are not filed by the 88th day before the election, during normal business hours, as posted, the voters shall have until the 83rd day before the election during normal business hours, as posted, to nominate candidates other than the person who was the incumbent on the 88th day, for that incumbent's elective office. This is not applicable where there is no incumbent eligible to be elected. If this section is applicable, a candidate may withdraw his or her declaration of candidacy until the 83rd day before the election. PUBLIC EXAMINATION PERIOD (E.C. § 13313) There will be a 10-day examination period for Candidate Statements filed from August 18 through August 27. August 17 (83) City Council LAST DAY TO WITHDRAW MEASURE (E.C. § 9605) Whenever a legislative body has ordered that a measure be submitted to the voters of any jurisdiction at an election, the order of election shall not be amended or withdrawn after this date. August 17 (83) City Clerk / City Council INSUFFICIENT NOMINEES-POSSIBLE PROCEDURES (E.C. § 10229) If on this date no one or only one person has been nominated, the officer conducting the election shall inform the governing body that it may, at a regular meeting or special meeting held before the election, adopt one of the following: 1. Appoint the person who was nominated. 2. If no one has been nominated, appoint any eligible elector. 3. Hold the election. The provisions of this section shall not apply if, at the regularly scheduled municipal election, more than one person has been nominated to another city office to be elected on a citywide basis or, a city measure has qualified and is to be submitted to the voters at that municipal election. PUBLISH NOTICE OF FACTS (G.C. § 6061) The City Clerk shall publish a notice of the facts described in this section and the courses of action available. After the fifth day following the date of publication, the City Council may make the appointment or direct an election to be held. August 18 (82) Candidates / City Clerks WITHDRAW CANDIDATE STATEMENT (EXTENSION) (E.C. §§ 10516, 13307) In the event there is an extension of the nomination period, candidates may have until this date to withdraw their candidate statement. Withdrawal must be in writing to the City Clerk. August 18 (82) Secretary of State RANDOMIZED ALPHABET (E.C. § 13112) On this date, the Secretary of State shall conduct a drawing of the alphabet for determining the order of candidates’ names on the ballot. 271 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Page 4 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION August 19 (81) City Clerk SUBMIT NAMES OF CANDIDATES TO THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS (E.C. § 10403) The last day to submit to the Registrar of Voters names and ballot designations of candidates as they are to appear on the ballot. The Certified List should be submitted in alphabetical order by the office. August 22 (78) City Clerk PUBLISH NOMINEES (E.C. § 12110) Suggested date to publish candidate’s names in the random order that they will appear on the ballot, and the respective offices for which they have been nominated. August 22 (78) City Attorney / City Clerk IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE (E.C. § 9280) The governing body may direct the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the City Attorney. This is the suggested date for the City Attorney to prepare and submit an analysis of measure showing the effect it will have on the existing law, etc. if so directed by the governing body. The analysis shall include a statement indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city. The analysis shall be printed in the Voter Information Guide section of the Sample Ballot preceding the arguments. The impartial analysis shall not exceed 500 words. In the event the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot or in the Voter Information Guide section portion of the County Voter Information Guide, there shall be immediately below the impartial analysis a statement notifying voters that they may obtain a copy of the ordinance or measure by calling the City Clerk’s office and requesting one. PUBLIC EXAM PERIOD (E.C. § 9295) There will be a 10-day exam period from August 23 through September 1. August 22 (78) Proponents / Opponents / City Clerk LAST DAY TO FILE ARGUMENTS (E.C. §§ 9282, 9283, 9286) The last date to file arguments with the City Clerk regarding any measure to be on the ballot. Arguments shall not exceed 300 words and shall be accompanied by a Statement of Authors form. No more than five authors may sign the statement. City Clerk to forward a file copy of the arguments to the Registrar of Voters. PUBLIC EXAMINATION PERIOD (E.C. § 9295) There will be a 10-day examination period from August 23 through September 1. 272 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Page 5 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION August 25 (75) City Council INSUFFICIENT NOMINEES – ACTION BY GOVERNING BODY (E.C. § 10229) If by the 75th day before the municipal election, no person has been appointed to office pursuant to E.C. § 10229, the election will be held. Notwithstanding Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 8600) of Division 8 or any other provision of the law to the contrary, if the governing body of the city makes an appointment pursuant to E.C. § 10229, the City Clerk shall not accept for filing any statement of write-in candidacy, which is submitted after the appointment. September 1 (68) Proponents / Opponents / City Clerk LAST DAY TO FILE REBUTTALS TO ARGUMENTS (E.C. § 9285) Last date for authors of primary arguments to file rebuttals to arguments with the City Clerk. Rebuttals are limited to 250 words. NOTE: Rebuttals only apply when the legislative body has adopted provisions pursuant to E.C. § 9285 PUBLIC EXAM PERIOD (E.C. § 9295) There will be a 10-day exam period from September 2 through September 11. September 5 Registrar of Voters LABOR DAY (CO. ORD. 358.8) The Registrar of Voters office will be closed. September 12 (57) Candidates / City Clerk FIRST DAY NOMINATION PAPERS FOR WRITE-IN CANDIDACY WILL BE AVAILABLE (E.C. § 8600 et seq.) Any qualifying person wishing to file as a write-in candidate may pick up nomination papers beginning on this date. Papers must be filed with the City Clerk no later than 14 days before Election Day. Write-in candidates must also file Statement of Economic Interest and campaign disclosure statements. September 13 (56) Registrar of Voters ORDER PRINTING OF ELECTION MATERIAL Suggested date to prepare copy for printer and order ballots. September 25 – September 29 (44 – 40) Candidates / Committees / City Clerk FILING PERIOD FOR FIRST PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (G.C. §§ 84200.5, 84200.8) The filing period for 1st pre-election campaign statement covers transactions through September 24. Statements must be filed online or sent by personal delivery or first-class mail. 273 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Page 6 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION September 26 (43) Registrar of Voters SATELLITE LOCATION PRESS RELEASE (E.C. § 3018) Notice of satellite locations shall be made by the elections official by the issuance of a general news release, issued not later than 14 days before voting at the satellite location, except that in a county with a declared emergency or disaster, notice shall be made not later than 48 hours before voting at the satellite location. The news release shall set forth the following information: The satellite location or locations. The dates and hours the satellite location or locations will be open. A telephone number that voters may use to obtain information regarding vote-by-mail ballots and the satellite locations. September 29 – October 29 (40 – 10) Registrar of Voters MAIL COUNTY VOTER INFORMATION GUIDE AND OTHER ELECTION MATERIALS TO VOTERS (E.C. §§ 9223, 9280 et seq., 13303, 13307; G.C. § 57148) Between these dates, the Registrar of Voters shall mail a County Voter Information Guide to each voter, who is registered at least 29 days before the election. October 10 (29) Registrar of Voters COLUMBUS DAY (CO. ORD. 358.8) The Registrar of Voters office will be closed. October 10 (29) Registrar of Voters MAILED BALLOT PRECINCTS (E.C. §§ 3005, 3010, 3017, 3018, 3020) Approximate date to mail notices to voters in mailed ballot precincts and send official ballot and election material. Mail ballot precincts have less than 250 voters. Ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day and received by the elections official within seven days after Election Day to be counted. October 10 (29) Registrar of Voters PRECINCTS, POLLING PLACE & ELECTION OFFICERS (E.C. §§ 12280 et seq., 12300 et seq.) The last day for the Registrar of Voters to establish polling places and appoint election officers for this election. Immediately following the appointment, the Registrar shall mail appointment notices to election officers. October 10 – October 29 (29 – 10) Registrar of Voters PUBLISH POLLING PLACE & CENTRAL COUNTING PLACE (E.C. §§ 12105, 12109) Suggested date to publish polling place. The notice will include the hours that the polls will be open and a Notice of Central Counting Place. October 10 – November 1 (29 – 7) Registrar of Voters VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOT APPLICATIONS (E.C. §§ 3001, 3006, 3021, 3200) Applications for Vote-by-Mail ballots may be made in person or by mail during this time frame. 274 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Page 7 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION October 18 (21) Registrar of Voters PROCESS BALLOTS (E.C. § 15101 et. seq.) When ballots are to be counted by computer, the Registrar of Voters may begin processing ballots 15 business days before the election. No count may be made until 8:00 p.m. on Election Day. October 23 – October 27 (16 – 12) Candidates / Committees / City Clerk FILING PERIOD FOR SECOND PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (G.C. §§ 84200.5, 84200.8) The filing period for 2nd pre-election campaign statement covers transactions through October 22. Statements must be filed online or sent by personal delivery or guaranteed overnight service. October 24 (15) Registrar of Voters COLLECTION CENTERS PUBLIC NOTICE (E.C. § 15260) In establishing a collection center, the elections official may designate a group of precincts which the center shall serve, and this designation shall be available for public inspection no later than 15 days before the election. October 24 (15) Registrar of Voters CLOSE OF REGISTRATION (E.C. §§ 2102, 2106) The last day to register or transfer registration for this election. October 25 (14) Candidates / City Clerk FILE DECLARATION OF WRITE-IN CANDIDACY (E.C. §§ 8600 et seq., 15340 et seq.) The last day for write-in candidates to submit their write-in nomination papers including petitions to the City Clerk. October 25 – November 1 (14 – 7) Registrar of Voters POST-ELECTION OFFICERS & POLLING PLACE (E.C. § 12105.5) Not less than one week before the election, the elections official shall post a list of all current polling places and a list of election officers appointed by the 15th day before the election. The elections official shall post this list in his or her office and on his or her Web site. The list shall remain posted for 30 days after completion of the canvass. October 31 (8) Registrar of Voters LIST OF VOTERS AND POLLING PLACE INFORMATION The approximate date that the Registrar of Voters will provide a list of voters to the City Clerk with polling place information. November 1 (7) Registrar of Voters LOGIC AND ACCURACY TESTING (E.C. § 15000) No later than seven days before any election, the elections official shall conduct a test or series of tests to ensure that every device used to tabulate ballots accurately records each vote. November 4 (4) Registrar of Voters MANUAL TALLY PUBLIC NOTICE (E.C. § 15360) The manual tally shall be a public process, with the official conducting the election providing at least a five-day public notice of the time and place of the manual tally and of the time and place of the selection of the precincts to be tallied before conducting the tally and selection. 275 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Page 8 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 (E.C. §§ 1301, 9200 et seq., 10002, 10100 et seq.) DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION November 8 ELECTION DAY (E.C. §§ 3020, 4103) Voted ballots must be received by the elections official no later than 8:00 p.m. on Election Day or be postmarked on or before Election Day and received no later than seven days after Election Day to be counted. November 10 (+2) Registrar of Voters CANVASS ELECTION RETURNS (E.C. §§ 10260 et seq., 15301 et seq.) Registrar of Voters shall commence the official canvass on this day. November 10 – December 8 (+2 – 30) Registrar of Voters ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY (E.C. § 15360) During the Official Canvass, the Elections Official shall conduct a public manual tally in 1 percent of the precincts chosen at random by the elections official. November 11 Registrar of Voters VETERANS DAY (CO. ORD. 358.8) The Registrar of Voters office will be closed. November 24 – November 25 Registrar of Voters THANKSGIVING DAY / DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING (CO. ORD. 358.8) The Registrar of Voters Office will be closed. December 6 (+28) Registrar of Voters POST ELECTION OFFICERS & POLLING PLACE (E.C. § 12105.5) Not later than 28 days after the election, the elections official shall post an updated list of polling places and election officers that served on Election Day. The elections official shall post this list in his or her office and on his or her Web site. The list shall remain posted for 30 days after completion of the canvass. December 8 (+30) Registrar of Voters STATEMENT OF RESULTS (E.C. §15372) No later than this date, the Registrar of Voters will certify the election results. December 8 (+30) City Clerk / City Council / Candidates DECLARE CANDIDATES ELECTED (E.C. §§ 10262, 10263) The governing body shall meet at its usual place of meeting no later than the next regularly scheduled city council meeting following the presentation of the canvass of the returns, or at a special meeting called for this purpose, to declare the results and to install the newly elected officers. December 8 (+30) Registrar of Voters COST OF ELECTION Approximate date to send an invoice to jurisdiction for the cost of the election. January 1 – January 31 Candidates / Committees / City Clerk FILING PERIOD FOR SEMI-ANNUAL CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (G.C. § 84200) The statement covers transactions through December 31. Statements must be filed online or sent by personal delivery or first-class mail. Note: Whenever a date prescribed by law falls on a weekend or holiday, such act may be performed on the next business day (E.C. § 15; G.C. §§ 6700, 6701) 276 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 1, 2022 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM 2021 CHARACTERISTICS, COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OVERVIEW; CURRENT AND FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND INITIATIVES; AND CITIZENS’ MEASURE INITIATIVE UPDATE RECOMMENDATION Discuss the Short-Term Vacation Rental program 2021 characteristics, compliance and enforcement overview; current and future objectives and initiatives; and citizens’ measure initiative update. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  On May 20, 2021, Section 3.25.055 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) established a permanent ban on the issuance of new short-term vacation rental (STVR) permits in residential areas (Permit Ban), unless the property is located within an “exempt” area depicted on the map in Attachment 1.  New permits have not been issued outside of exempt areas since August 4, 2020; existing permit-holders in Permit Ban areas may renew permits, but permits cannot be transferred.  Throughout 2021, the number of permits and STVR density in Permit Ban areas declined by 19.38% due to the Permit Ban combined with attrition related to home sales and non-renewals.  A citizens’ initiative petition is currently being circulated to phase-out and permanently ban non-hosted STVRs in non-exempt areas by January 1, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT – None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City imposed a moratorium on the issuance of new STVR permits on August 4, 2020 via Executive Order No. 10, and extended it in succeeding amendments. Section 3.25.055 of the LQMC established a permanent Permit Ban on the issuance of new STVR permits in residential areas (Permit Ban areas) effective May 20, 2021. Permit-holders may renew existing permits, but permits cannot be transferred. STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 149 Click Here to Return to Agenda The issuance of new STVR permits is banned in Permit Ban areas, and no new permits have been issued since August 4, 2020. New permits continue to be issued in a few select “Exempt Areas” zoned for tourist commercial, village commercial, and communities expressly developed to allow STVRs, as depicted on the map in Attachment 1. In 2021, the City began reporting enhanced analytics related to the STVR program. A summary report of the STVR program characteristics, STVR permits and density decline, and increased compliance was presented to Council on December 7, 2021, and encompassed the first three quarters of 2021. STVR Program Characteristics – December 2021 The City’s STVR program consisted of 1,165 active permits as of December 2021. Figure 1 Figure 2 22 63 1,080 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Homeshares Primary Residence General Permits December 2021 STVR Permits by Type 1,320 1,283 1,257 1,238 1,235 1,216 1,185 1,185 1,181 1,186 1,184 1,165 1,050 1,100 1,150 1,200 1,250 1,300 1,350 JAN‐21 FEB‐21 MAR‐21 APR‐21 MAY‐21 JUN‐21 JUL‐21 AUG‐21 SEP‐21 OCT‐21 NOV‐21 DEC‐21 2021 STVR Permits Citywide 150 Click Here to Return to Agenda Table 1 below lists the number of STVR permits for each area along with the total number of approved parcels for 2021. The City’s total STVR permits have gradually declined each month due to the Permit Ban combined with attrition related to home sales and non-renewals. Table 1 Within the residential Permit Ban areas, as of December 2021, active STVR permits have collectively declined 19.38% (from 1,037 to 836) since January 2021: Permit Ban Area Permits Density % Change since Jan ‘21 North La Quinta 112 4.4% -18.25% Mid La Quinta 118 11.5% -15.71% The Cove 252 5.3% -13.70% South La Quinta (PGA West) 354 11.6% -24.36% Totals 836 7.4% -19.38% Figure 3 below depicts the number of STVR permits within each area for 2021. Figure 3 137 130 124 118 118 115 114 112 112 112 112 112 140 135 132 132 130 127 122 122 121 122 122 118 292 282 276 270 268 263 261 259 258 258 256 252 468 453 438 428 420 407 382 379 375 372 370 354 1,037 1,000 970 948 936 912 879 872 866 864 860 836 JAN‐21 FEB‐21 MAR‐21 APR‐21 MAY‐21 JUN‐21 JUL‐21 AUG‐21 SEP‐21 OCT‐21 NOV‐21 DEC‐21 STVR Permits in Banned Areas 19.4% Decline in 2021 North La Quinta Mid La Quinta The Cove South La Quinta (PGA West) 151 Click Here to Return to Agenda STVR density is calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of STVR permits by the number of developed parcels within each area, as listed in Table 1 above. Figure 4 below shows that density in residential Permit Ban areas collectively decreased in 2021 from 9.14% to 7.4%: Figure 4 Figure 5 further depicts the gradual density changes for each residential Permit Ban area throughout 2021: Figure 5 STVR Program Compliance Overview The City’s STVR program consists of several interdependent activities such as permitting, licensing, tax collection, and compliance. This section of the Staff Report focuses on specific compliance functions, which include managing complaints, conducting investigations, and enforcement (violations, citations, and suspensions). 9.14%8.81%8.55%8.36%8.25%8.04%7.75%7.69%7.63%7.62%7.58%7.4% JAN‐21 FEB‐21 MAR‐21 APRI‐21 MAY‐21 JUN‐21 JUL‐21 AUG‐21 SEP‐21 OCT‐21 NOV‐21 DEC‐21 Density in STVR Banned Areas STVR Permit Ban Areas 5.3%5.1%4.8%4.6% 4.6%4.5%4.4%4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 13.7%13.2%12.9% 12.9%12.7%12.4%11.9% 11.9%11.8%11.9% 11.9%11.5% 6.2%6.0%5.9%5.7%5.7%5.6%5.5%5.5%5.5% 5.5%5.4%5.3% 15.4%14.9%14.4%14.1%13.8%13.4% 12.6%12.5%12.3%12.2%12.2%11.6% JAN‐21 FEB‐21 MAR‐21 APRI‐21 MAY‐21 JUN‐21 JUL‐21 AUG‐21 SEP‐21 OCT‐21 NOV‐21 DEC‐21 Density in STVR Banned Areas North La Quinta Mid La Quinta The Cove South La Quinta (PGA West) 152 Click Here to Return to Agenda On January 15, 2021, the City implemented several code changes to enhance the STVR program’s compliance tools and increase fines. Subsequently overall compliance has increased while disturbance complaints have decreased. STVR compliance activities are separated into one of two categories:  Disturbance – the majority of disturbance compliance activities are due to noise, generally caused by large events or gatherings, children running/screaming/laughing, popping balloons, construction, slamming doors, etc. Other complaints include excessive parking; bright lights; trash; unsecured pool access; unmaintained yard, etc.  Administrative – the overwhelming majority of administrative compliance matters are related to operating/advertising without a STVR permit or business license, or failure to display STVR permit on listings. Others include incorrect or missing occupancy limit advertised on listings; failure to report/remit transient occupancy tax, etc. Figures 6 and 7 below, depict citywide STVR complaints throughout 2021. Of note:  Complaints peaked at 348 in Q-2 (April-June) and steadily declined by 75.57% to a total of 85 complaints in Q-4 (October-December).  Unpermitted complaints became a relative majority of complaints in the 2nd half of 2021: Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Permitted STVRs 59.3% 53.4% 40.1% 44.7% Unpermitted STVRs 40.7% 46.6% 59.9% 55.3% o Throughout Q-1 and Q-2, 41% of complaints were for unpermitted properties. o Throughout Q-3 and Q-4, 60% of complaints were for unpermitted properties.  Citywide complaints declined significantly in the 2nd half of 2021: o Between Q-2 and Q-3, excluding one-time submission of 145 vendor generated complaints in July, the remaining 149 community/City-generated complaints reflect a 57% decrease in complaints between the Q-2 and Q-3. o Using the same assumption (excluding the one-time July submission), complaints decreased an additional 42.9% between the Q-3 and Q-4. 153 Click Here to Return to Agenda Figure 6 categorizes complaints by permitted and unpermitted STVR properties: Figure 6 Figure 7 depicts citywide complaints for each area: Figure 7 192 186 118 38 132 162 176 47 324 348 294 85 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Q‐1Q‐2Q‐3Q‐4 2021 STVR Complaints Citywide Permitted STVRs Unpermitted STVRs 7 13 21 599 26 8 92 107 69 13 120 81 68 19 19 23 29 9 77 115 81 31 324 348 294 85 Q‐1Q‐2Q‐3Q‐4 2021 STVR Complaints Citywide by Area North La Quinta Mid La Quinta The Cove South La Quinta (PGA West) STVR Exempt Areas HOA Legacy 154 Click Here to Return to Agenda Enforcement Figures 8 and 9 below depict quarterly STVR-related citations for 2021. Of note:  Similar to the complaints trendline, citations peaked at 86 in Q-2 (April-June) and steadily declined 82.55% to a total of 15 complaints by Q-4 (October- December).  Similar to the complaints trendline, the relative percentage of unpermitted citations increased throughout 2021: Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Permitted Citations 39.0% 33.7% 33.3% 20.0% Unpermitted Citations 61.0% 66.3% 66.7% 80.0% o 65% of all 2021 citations were issued to unpermitted STVR properties, as depicted in Figure 8 below. o 70% of all 2021 citations were issued for administrative matters, as depicted in Figure 9 below (as defined earlier in this report – primarily for operating/advertising without a STVR permit or business license, or failure to display STVR permit on listings). Figure 8 30 29 20 3 47 57 40 12 77 86 60 15 Q‐1Q‐2Q‐3Q‐4 2021 Quarterly STVR Citations Permitted & Unpermitted Permitted Citations Unpermitted Citations 155 Click Here to Return to Agenda Figure 9 Figure 10 includes unpermitted compliance activities for comparison with permitted STVR properties. Figure 10 For the month of December, less than 0.8% of permitted STVR properties received complaints and were subject to any enforcement action, including zero suspensions, which both reflect the lowest levels for 2021: JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC  7.05% 3.51% 4.30% 5.17% 6.88% 3.04% 5.82% 2.62% 1.52% 1.10% 1.35% 0.77%  Figure 11: Monthly percentage of STVR Permitted Properties with complaints and/or enforcement action in 2021. 52 56 45 13253015 2 77 86 60 15 Q‐1Q‐2Q‐3Q‐4 2021 Quarterly STVR Citations Administrative Vs. Disturbance Administrative Disturbance 78 50 50 39 48 34 58 24 22 16 16 10 48 25 52 61 55 42 120 52 73 36 20 11 1,320 1,283 1,257 1,238 1,235 1,216 1,185 1,185 1,181 1,186 1,184 1,165 1,050 1,100 1,150 1,200 1,250 1,300 1,350 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 JAN‐21 FEB‐21 MAR‐21 APR‐21 MAY‐21 JUN‐21 JUL‐21 AUG‐21 SEP‐21 OCT‐21 NOV‐21 DEC‐21 2021 STVR Permits Citywide Permitted Properties w/Complaints, Notices, Citations, Suspensions Unpermitted Properties w/Complaints, Notices, Citations Permitted STRs 156 Click Here to Return to Agenda Taxes, Fees, and STVR Program Costs Table 2 provides an overview of annual STVR program revenues between 2019- 2021. Of note:  Despite declining STVR permits, TOT revenues continued to increase in 2021.  Citation Fine collections spiked 2020-21 in correlation with enhanced enforcement tools but are expected to decrease in 2022 as overall compliance increases.  Permit/licensing fees and fine collections were sufficient to cover STVR program operational costs in 2021 and are projected to be sufficient for 2022. * Citation Fine Collections revenue list collections current as of 1/25/2022 Table 2 Table 3 depicts TOT revenues for each area for the 2nd half of 2021:  Permit Ban areas generated 82.65% of STVR TOT revenues ($2,341,271.09).  Exempt areas generated 17.35% of STVR TOT revenues ($491,452.96). *TOT revenue list collections current as of February 2022 Table 3 157 Click Here to Return to Agenda Citizens’ Initiative Petition On January 12, 2022, a citizens’ intent to circulate a petition was filed with the City, proposing an ordinance to amend the La Quinta Municipal Code (Code) to phase-out and permanently ban non-hosted STVRs in non-exempt areas by January 1, 2025. To date, all filings have been timely submitted, and the proponents have 180 days from January 27, 2022, to obtain the requisite number of signatures (10% of the registered voters) to qualify the proposed measure initiative for the ballot. Pursuant to California Elections Code § 9212, during the circulation of the petition, the City Council may refer the proposed measure initiative to a city agency or agencies to prepare a report evaluating its potential impacts. Based on the nature of the measure initiative, Staff submits the following report areas for consideration:  Fiscal impact: projected impact to TOT and STVR program management costs.  Projected economic impact:  Visitor spending  Personal income  Employment  Local tax revenues  Survey of outcomes in jurisdictions in which STVRs have been banned, actively regulated, or remain unregulated:  Property values  Illicit or “black market” STVRs  Residential development  Housing availability and rents  Survey(s) to understand the demographics and/or sentiment of impacted business owners, operators, and stakeholders. Staff seeks directions if the report should be contemplated at this time, and if so, the scope of the report’s criteria and preferred timeline. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. STVR Banned and Exempt Areas Map 158 Click Here to Return to Agenda (6 (5 (3 (2 (8 (4 (10 (9 (1 (7 (11 SH-111 MADISON ST54TH AVEWASHINGTON ST48TH AVE EISENHOWER DR52ND AVE JEFFERSON STMILES AVE AIRPORT BLVAVENIDA CARRANZA58TH AVE FRED WARING DR 50TH AVE AVENIDA BERMUDASMONROE STFRED WARING DR 50TH AVE JEFFERSON STJEFFERSON ST58TH AVE EISENHOWER DR 58TH AVE ¯ 0 0.45 0.9 1.35 1.80.225 Miles STVR Exempt STVR_exempt_zone North La Quinta Cove Mid La Quinta South La Quinta City Boundary Id name zoning 1 Homewood Suites (La Quinta Desert Villas - Center Pointe) Tourist Commercial (TC) District 2 Legacy Villas Tourist Commercial (TC) District & Development Agreement 3 La Quinta Resort including Spa & Tennis Villas Tourist Commercial (TC) District & Adjacent to TC District 4 Embassy Suites Village Commercial District 5 Village Commercial Village Commercial District 6 SilverRock Specific Plan Tourist Commercial (TC) District - Undeveloped 7 Codorniz Entitlement Approval 8 Signature at PGA West Tourist Commercial (TC) District 9 Puerta Azul Entitlement Approval 10 SW corner Ave 64 & Madison St Tourist Commercial (TC) District - Undeveloped 11 NW corner Ave 64 & Madison St Tourist Commercial (TC) District - Undeveloped ATTACHMENT 1 159 Click Here to Return to Agenda 160 Click Here to Return to Agenda