Loading...
2023 08 01 Counciltad 0 � o ta - GEM of the DESERT — City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City's web page: www.LaQuin taCA.pov CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 1, 2023 3:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION 1 4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION Members of the public may listen to this meeting by tuning -in live via httD://laauinta.12milesout.com/video/live. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENTS - INSTRUCTIONS Members of the public may address the City Council on any matter listed or not listed on the agenda as follows: WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided either in -person during the meeting by submitting 15 copies to the City Clerk, it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting; or can be emailed in advance to CityClerkMail(@LaQuintaCA.gov, no later than 12:00 p.m., on the day of the meeting. Written public comments will be distributed to Council, made public, and will be incorporated into the public record of the meeting, but will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of public comments is asked to be reported. If written public comments are emailed, the email subject line must clearly state "Written Comments" and should include: 1) full name, 2) city of residence, and 3) subject matter. VERBAL PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided in -person during the meeting by completing a "Request to Speak" form and submitting it to the City Clerk; it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). Members of the public shall be called upon to speak by the Mayor. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 of 7 AUGUST 1, 2023 In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2022-027, a one-time additional speaker time donation of three (3) minutes per individual is permitted; please note that the member of the public donating time must: 1) submit this in writing to the City Clerk by completing a "Request to Speak" form noting the name of the person to whom time is being donated to, and 2) be present at the time the speaker provides verbal comments. Verbal public comments are defined as comments provided in the speakers' own voice and may not include video or sound recordings of the speaker or of other individuals or entities, unless permitted by the Mayor. Public speakers may elect to use printed presentation materials to aid their comments; 15 copies of such printed materials shall be provided to the City Clerk to be disseminated to the City Council, made public, and incorporated into the public record of the meeting; it is requested that the printed materials are provided prior to the beginning of the meeting. There shall be no use of Chamber resources and technology to display visual or audible presentations during public comments, unless permitted by the Mayor. All writings or documents, including but not limited to emails and attachments to emails, submitted to the City regarding any item(s) listed or not listed on this agenda are public records. All information in such writings and documents is subject to disclosure as being in the public domain and subject to search and review by electronic means, including but not limited to the City's Internet Web site and any other Internet Web -based platform or other Web -based form of communication. All information in such writings and documents similarly is subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act [Government Code § 7920.000 et seq.]. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed above. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY — INSTRUCTIONS Teleconference accessibility may be triggered in accordance with AB 2449 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 285), codified in the Brown Act [Government Code § 549531, if a member of the City Council requests to attend and participate in this meeting remotely due to `just cause" or "emergency circumstances, " as defined, and only if the request is approved. In such instances, remote public accessibility and participation will be facilitated via Zoom Webinar as detailed at the end of this Agenda. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 of 7 AUGUST 1, 2023 CLOSED SESSION 1. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957, COUNCIL APPOINTED POSITION — CITY ATTORNEY RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed above. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS — None CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 2016-031, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET, SOUTH OF AVENUE 50 2. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2022-30 3. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JULY 7, JULY 14, AND JULY 21, 2023 4. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR FINANCE AND HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE SERVICES 5. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC, FOR ON -CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES, TO INCREASE THE COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 of 7 AUGUST 1, 2023 6. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE CITY PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S URBAN COUNTY PROGRAM FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2024-2025, 2025-2026, AND 2026-2027 [RESOLUTION NO. 2023-030] 7. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR UP TO SIX EMPLOYEES FROM THE FINANCE AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENTS TO ATTEND THE CALPERS EDUCATIONAL FORUM IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, OCTOBER 1-4, 2023 BUSINESS SESSION — None STUDY SESSION PAGE 1. DISCUSS REVISIONS TO THE PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY, DISTINGUISHED ARTISTS, AND DISTINGUISHED ATHLETES AWARD PROGRAMS 2. DISCUSS MARKETING RECAP FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 AND MARKETING STRATEGIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 3. DISCUSS IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT CONTRACT EXPIRATION AND THE OPTIONS IN MOVING FORWARD THAT ADDRESS AGING EQUIPMENT AND STRESSED POWER GRID; PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY'S RESPONSE TO THE MARCH 2O23 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION STUDY; AND APPOINT TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO FINALIZE THE COMMENT LETTER PUBLIC HEARINGS — 5:00 p.m. or thereafter For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item; comments are limited to three (3) minutes (approximately 350 words). Any person may submit written comments to the City Council prior to the public hearing and/or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project(s) at the time of the public hearing. If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. PAGE 1. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLACEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS ON THE FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 PROPERTY TAX ROLL [RESOLUTION NO. 2023-031] 2. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (EA 2022-0001) AND APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 of 7 AUGUST 1, 2023 FOR A 252-UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 [RESOLUTION NOS. 2023-032 AND 2023-033] DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY RESOURCES 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT - QUARTERLY REPORT - APRIL-JUNE 2023 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC WORKS - DISCUSS LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION PROJECT 2016-031 TO INCLUDE AN ACTIVITIES PROMENADE; LOCATION: CACTUS FLOWER DEVELOPMENT MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT - COACHELLA VALLEY ENERGY COMMISSION (Evans) 6. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 7. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 8. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 9. GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Evans) 10. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Fitzpatrick) 11. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (McGarrey) 12. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & McGarrey) 13. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Pena) 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 15. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Pena & Sanchez) 16. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Pena) 17. CVAG VALLEY -WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Pena) 18. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE (Pena) 19. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT - ENERGY CONSUMERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (McGarrey) 20. COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (Pena) 21. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 of 7 AUGUST 1, 2023 22. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Pena) 23. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Evans & Sanchez) 24. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 25. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Sanchez & Pena) 26. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 27. PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT COMMISSION — MARKETING & BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 12, 2023 28. PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 19, 2023 ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The regular City Council meetings of August 15, 2023, and September 5, 2023, have been cancelled. The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on September 19, 2023, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chamber, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City's website, near the entrance to the Council Chamber at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin board at the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on July 28, 2023. DATED: July 28, 2023 V it MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices • Agenda packet materials are available for public inspection: 1) at the Clerk's Office at La Quinta City Hall, located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253; and 2) on the City's website at www.laquintaca.gov/councilagendas, in accordance with the Brown Act [Government Code § 54957.5; AB 2647 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 971)]. • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at (760) 777-7123, 24- hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6 of 7 AUGUST 1, 2023 691 693 If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that 15 copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. *** TELECONFERENCE PROCEDURES — PURSUANT TO AB 2449*** APPLICABLE ONLY WHEN TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY IS IN EFFECT Verbal public comments via Teleconference — members of the public may attend and participate in this meeting by teleconference via Zoom and use the "raise your hand" feature when public comments are prompted by the Mayor; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and general public and allow him/her/them to speak on the item(s) requested. Please note — members of the public must unmute themselves when prompted upon being recognized by the Mayor, in order to become audible to the City Council and the public. Only one person at a time may speak by teleconference and only after being recognized by the Mayor. ZOOM LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/m/82540879912 Meeting ID: 825 4087 9912 Or join by phone: (253) 215 — 8782 Written public comments — can be provided in person during the meeting or emailed to the City Clerk's Office at CityClerkMail(a)LaQuintaCA.gov any time prior to the adjournment of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City Council, made public, incorporated into the public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk's Office can accommodate such request. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 7 of 7 AUGUST 1, 2023 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 2016-031, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET, SOUTH OF AVENUE 50 RECOMMENDATION Approve plans, specifications, engineer's estimate, and authorize Staff to bid the La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvements Project No. 2016-031, located on the east side of Jefferson Street, south of Avenue 50. tXtL;U I IVt bWAIVIAKY • The City recently constructed a sidewalk along the east side of Jefferson Street, south of Avenue 50, which removed a large amount of existing vegetation. Staff recommends replacing the vegetation concurrent with the construction of the Cactus Flower Landscape Renovation Improvements Project for scale of economy and like work. (Attachment 1) • The project includes over 2,500 square feet of new landscape and irrigation. FISCAL IMPACT The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has allocated $9,963,148 to Landscape Renovation projects, $9,043,914 of Measure G Funds, $426,073 of General Funds, $479,661 of CVWD reimbursement, and $13,500 of Arts in Public Places Funds. The following is the project budget: Total Budget (All Phases)* Expended To Date Phase 7 Cactus Flower Jefferson Street Professional: $ 547,258 $ 242,715 $ 30,000 $ 2,000 Design: $ 699,212 $ 518,047 $ 76,610 $ 6,000 Inspection/Tes ting/Survey: $ 677,242 $ 69,758 $ 40,000 $ 2,000 Construction: $ 6,970,407 $4,930,967 $1,336,060 $ 95,000 Contingency: $ 1,069,029 $ 0 $ 134,000 $ 10,000 Total Budget: $ 9,963,148 $5,761,487 $1,616,670 $ 115,000 *Note: This is the last phase in the multi -year Landscaping Renovation Project. 0 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 2021 the City completed a sidewalk on the east side of Jefferson Street from Avenue 50 south approximately 660 feet. The City utilized Community Block Grant Funds (CDBG) for the project. The construction of the project required much of the existing vegetation to be removed. The landscaping replacement was planned to be included with the City's large-scale landscape and renovation improvement project for scale of economy and like work. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on August 1, 2023, the following is the project schedule: Council Bid Authorization Bid Period Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (70 Working Days) Accept Improvements ALTERNATIVES August 1, 2023 August 2 to September 12, 2023 October 3, 2023 October 4 to October 30, 2023 October 2023 to February 2024 February 2024 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/ City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 10 o _Ilk �' • ] IR IL 46 49— e' i • .� . fi In t t 11% it c' A �rson Jeffe 'Zo a g „x ��rJ,<r�,►sr' � *„�� �: +Ap�4 ,0# �� i ': rw { #►F # Y. 4O!+�. ` O -. '• •t t L� � ��� �+YV" ��iyF � � � _ -R� �• it -*6AWItMak�p It V. �s� ��`� z���w�n� -_�c-_ _. •-- ��,���rJa�r�ur#-� � � .ram ' � . 12 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2022-30 RECOMMENDATION Approve plans, specifications, engineer's estimate, and authorize Staff to bid the Cove Trails Parking Lot Improvements Project No. 2022-30, located on Calle Tecate between Avenida Madero and Avenida Juarez, and on Calle Tecate at Avenida Bermudas. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This project has two locations with identical scopes of work (Attachment 1): o Calle Tecate and Avenida Madero; Calle Tecate and Avenida Bermudas — Work will include to remove four (4) inches of unstable existing native dirt and rock and replace it with four (4) inches of compacted class II aggregate base. • This project is not currently included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Staff is currently only requesting authorization to advertise and will present bids and request for funding at a separate meeting. FISCAL IMPACT There is currently no fiscal impact to advertise the project. Funding for this project in the amount of $100,000 was allocated from the Greater Palm Springs Tourism Grant Account 401-0000-43650 Contributions from Other Agencies for construction cost. The following represents the preliminary budget to complete the project*: Total Budget Design/Professional: $ 10,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 10,000 Construction: $ 160,000 Contingency: $ 20,000 Total Budget: $ 200,000 13 *Note: Staff will make an appropriate fiscal recommendation when the Council considers award of the construction contract. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In January 2023 the City's grant application was approved for GPS Tourism Grant funding. The grant will provide $100,000 towards the construction phase of the Cove Trails parking lot improvements. The improvements to the parking lots will support the `Greater Palm Springs' destination pillars, stimulate the existing tourism location, and enhance the visitor experience. Also, the project will help mitigate the dust that is generated by vehicles driving over the native surface and allow for a more structured parking lot to include additional vehicles as well as allow for transit vans that bring hiking groups from the drive markets. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on August 1, 2023, the following is the project schedule: Council Bid Authorization Bid Period Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (10 Working Days) Accept Improvements ALTERNATIVES August 1, 2023 August 2 to August 30, 2023 September 19, 2023 September 19 to October 16, 2023 October 2023 November 2023 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 14 VICINITY MAP COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS In di an Wells 1 11 k-,— - - — - li tgnw �y : It i. . H iighw .111 -- 1 AV4rnue44 iyw4whr ar _ E 9 l a 7 I i La Quinta R i i -1olf fill, 45 4W A v m i i i 0 'IMPORTANT" Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not I— necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. 0 6 12,037 Feet REPORT PRINTED ON... 7/6/2023 11:20:59 AM © Riverside County GIs ATTACHMENT 1 Legend Blueline Streams World Street Map Notes 15 16 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JULY 7, JULY 14, AND JULY 21, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated July 7, July 14, and July 21, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City Successor Agency of RDA Housing Authority BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS $ 5,624,492.64 $ 36,775.78 $ 5,661,268.42 Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for July 7, July 14, and July 21, 2023. Warrants Issued: 211359-211387 $ 1,267,328.94 211388-211463 $ 293,921.48 211464-211511 $ 1,851,865.39 Voids $ (4,718.55) Wire Transfers $ 1,621,589.82 Payroll Tax Transfers $ 121,805.74 Payroll Direct Deposit $ 509,290.90 Payroll Check # 37674 $ 184.70 $ 5,661,268.42 'Check number 211512, payable to Southern California Gas Company, w ill be reported on a future Demand Register Report. 17 Three checks were voided and reissued due to non -receipt, mail theft, and an invoice was processed using the City's credit card. The most significant expenditures on the demand registers are: Vendor Account Name Amount California Joint Powers Various Insurance Ortiz Enterprises, Inc. Construction Desert Electric Supply(1) Various California Commercial Construction Pools, Inc. Visit Greater Palm VGPS Springs (1) Payments were made 7/14/23 & 7/21/23 Purpose $1,094,175.00 FY23/24 Insurance Premiums $656,291.63 Dune Palms Bridge Progress Payment $332,303.30 LED Light Poles for City Parks & Lighting and Landscape District $233,405.50 LQ Park Splash Pad Renovation Progress Payment $166,439.30 FY23/24 QTR 1 City Funding & FY 22/23 Additional Funding Wire Transfers: Sixteen transfers totaled $1,621,590. Of this amount, $1.0 million was to the Bank of New York Mellon for investment purchases, and $395,314 was to Landmark. (See Attachment 2 for a complete listing). Purchase Orders/Contracts: During the quarterly period starting April 1 through June 30, 2023, five purchase orders with a value between $25,000 and $50,000 were issued for a total of $170,929 (See Attachment 3 for a complete listing). Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions as well as total holdings are reported quarterly in the Treasurer's Report. Settle Coupon Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Date Rate YTM Maturity United States Treasury T-Bill $ 3,000,000 7/5/2023 0.000% 4.980% Purchase United States Treasury Treasury Note $ 2,000,000 7/12/2023 2.750% 5.380% Purchase United States Treasury Treasury Note $ 1,000,000 7/12/2023 0.875% 5.416% Maturity American National Bank CD $ 248,000 7/19/2023 2.000% 2.000% Purchase Balboa Thrift and Loan CD $ 248,000 7/19/2023 4.400% 4.400% Maturity First National Bank of America CD $ 245,000 7/20/2023 3.150% 3.150% Purchase Maine Savings FCU CD $ 248,000 7/21/2023 4.800% 4.800% Purchase Utah First FCU CD $ 245,000 7/21/2023 5.000% 5.000% 18 Prepared by: Jesse Batres, Account Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Attachments: 1. Demand Registers 2. Wire Transfers 3. Purchase Orders 19 ATTACHMENT 1 Demand Register Za Q�ra City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03516 - 07/07/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND SIGNATURE TINT 211378 06/22/23 - DIGITAL PRINT PICKLEBALL 5... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 258.60 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC.. 211360 FY 23/24 APA MEMBERSHIP D.CASTRO Membership Dues 101-6001-60351 125.00 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC.. 211360 FY 23/24 APA MEMBERSHIP C.FLORES Membership Dues 101-6002-60351 125.00 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC.. 211360 FY 23/24 APA MEMBERSHIP S.FERNAND... Membership Dues 101-6002-60351 125.00 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH... 211370 05/04-05/31/23 - BP #12 SCHOOL RESO... School Officer 101-2001-60168 18,706.22 WELLNESS WORKS 211386 06/2023 - EAP SERVICES Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 396.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 211385 06/28/23 - FLOWERS FOR CIVIC CENTER... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 690.00 XPRESS GRAPHICS 211387 03/23/23 - STAFF CHART POSTERS Printing 101-1006-60410 325.98 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALTRE... 211365 FY 23/24 CMTA MEMBERSHIP R.HALLICK Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 95.00 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 211381 06/28/23 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1004-60400 213.99 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 211375 06/23/23 - CITY STAFF SHIRTS Operating Supplies 101-1005-60420 51.26 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 211375 06/29/23 - CITY STAFF SHIRTS Operating Supplies 101-1005-60420 720.54 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 211380 06/29/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 263.76 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 211380 06/29/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 229.54 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 211380 06/29/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 181.01 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 211380 06/29/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 158.62 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 211380 06/30/23 - BASE ROCK Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 199.69 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 211380 06/30/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 216.78 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 211373 06/30/23 - IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 213.81 ESGIL CORPORATION 211372 05/2023 - ONCALL PLAN REVIEW SERVIC... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 1,050.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/22/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-2002-61101 1,114.15 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/22/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-3008-61101 597.36 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-2002-61101 656.98 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Monticello Park - Uti.. 101-3005-61102 13.65 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Civic Center Park - U.. 101-3005-61103 3,653.23 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Fritz Burns Park - Uti.. 101-3005-61105 1,300.81 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Sports Complex - Uti.. 101-3005-61106 2,906.64 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Colonel Paige - Utilit.. 101-3005-61108 12.34 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Community Park - U... 101-3005-61109 5,473.70 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Adams Park - Utiliti... 101-3005-61110 47.70 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Velasco Park - Utiliti... 101-3005-61111 13.99 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Eisenhower Park - U... 101-3005-61113 19.08 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Desert Pride - Utiliti... 101-3005-61114 13.33 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-3008-61101 18,827.92 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 06/15/23 - WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 617.81 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 06/15/23 - WATER SERVICE Water -Monticello Park - Utili... 101-3005-61201 3,650.60 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 06/15/23 - WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 70.13 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 06/22/23 - WATER SERVICE Water - Civic Center Park - Uti- 101-3005-61202 4,721.72 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 06/22/23 - WATER SERVICE Water -Community Park - Util.. 101-3005-61209 5,967.66 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 06/28/23 - WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 148.40 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - LQ PARK PEST CO... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 741.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - LQ PARK RODENT ... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 228.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - FS #32 PEST CONT... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 798.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - FS #32 RODENT C... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 570.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 SPORT COMPLEX P... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 391.40 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - WC PEST CONTROL Pest Control 101-3008-60116 889.20 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - WC RODENT CON... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 615.60 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - CH PEST CONTROL Pest Control 101-3008-60116 946.20 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - CH RODENT CONT... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 832.20 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - FS #70 PEST CONT... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 820.80 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - FS #70 RODENT C... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 570.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - FS #93 PEST CONT... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 752.40 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - FS #93 RODENT C... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 513.00 7/24/2023 4:05:27 PM Page 1 of 5 20 Demand Register Vendor Name TRULY NOLEN INC TRULY NOLEN INC TRULY NOLEN INC COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPT... DISH NETWORK AYON, UBALDO RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREA... CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREA... IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASS... Packet: APPKT03516 - 07/07/2023 JB Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - PW YARD PEST CO... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - FB PARK PEST CON... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 211383 07/01/23-06/30/24 - SRR PARK PEST C... Pest Control 101-3008-60116 211369 FY 23/24 PW YARD PERMIT Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 211371 06/22-07/21/23 - EOC CABLE Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 211361 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 211377 05/2023 - RECORDING FEES Due to County Recorder 101-0000-20325 211366 FY 23/24 - CPRS MEMBERSHIP R.ALVAR... Membership Dues 101-3005-60351 211366 FY 23/24 CPRS MEMBERSHIP B.TELLEZ Membership Dues 101-3005-60351 211374 06/22/2023 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - SilverRock Event Sit... 101-3005-61115 211367 06/15/23 - WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 211367 06/22/23 - WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 211367 06/22/23 - WATER SERVICE Water -Eisenhower Park - Util.. 101-3005-61203 211367 06/22/23 - WATER SERVICE Water -Velasco Park - Utilities 101-3005-61205 211367 06/28/23 - WATER SERVICE Water -Fritz Burns Park - Utili... 101-3005-61204 211367 06/28/23 - WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 211379 FY 23/24 MEMBERSHIP DUES ASSESSM... Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total Fund: 201- GAS TAX FUND TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 211382 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 TRULY NOLEN INC 211383 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND PWLC II, INC 211376 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211367 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 Fund: 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 211374 06/28/23 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 201-7003-61101 Fund 201- GAS TAX FUND Total: 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 202-3004-61101 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 202-3006-61101 07/01/23-06/30/24 - MUSEUM PEST C... Pest Control 202-3006-60116 07/01/23-06/30/24 - LIBRARY PEST CON... Pest Control 202-3004-60116 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 05/09/23 - PLANT REPLACEMENT WASH... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 06/15/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 06/15/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 06/22/2023 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 06/22/2023 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 06/15/23 - WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 06/22/23 - WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 06/28/23 - WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 06/22/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: Amount 570.00 456.00 855.00 1,129.00 100.70 200.00 50.00 150.00 145.00 4,077.51 40.80 254.50 143.53 191.58 2,577.20 695.23 4,856.00 99,332.85 444.84 655.20 1,100.04 5,037.90 1,472.64 592.80 843.60 7,946.94 1,520.00 405.99 12.34 336.87 483.72 4,962.40 2,026.92 937.91 6,858.03 10,243.02 118.92 850.50 28,756.62 06/28/23 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 235-0000-61101 1,784.13 Fund 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND Total: 1,784.13 Fund: 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY CAHA, BECKY 211363 06/2023 - HOUSING CONSULTANT SERV... Professional Services 241-9101-60103 4,800.00 Fund 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 4,800.00 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ACE ELECTRIC INC 211359 06/2023 - SPORTS COMPLEX LIGHTING ... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -750.50 ACE ELECTRIC INC 211359 06/2023 - SPORTS COMPLEX LIGHTING ... Construction 401-0000-60188 15,010.00 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 14,259.50 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BLUEBEAM, INC. 211362 FY 23/24 STUDIO PRIME SUBSCRIPTION Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 2,340.00 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 2,340.00 7/24/2023 4:05:27 PM 21 Page 2 of 5 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 211368 FY 23/24 PIONEER PARK LEASE Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 211364 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 211364 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 211364 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 211364 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 211364 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 211364 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 211364 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 211364 Fund: 760 - SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN US BAN K-PARS #6745031400 211384 Packet: APPKT03516-07/07/20231B Account Name Account Number Amount Parks 503-0000-71060 1.00 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total: 1.00 FY 23/24 LIABILITY INSURANCE Liability Insurance FY 23/24 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE Workers Comp Premium FY 23/24 PROPERTY INSURANCE PREMI... Property Insurance FY 23/24 ADMIN FEE & APPRAISAL FUND.. Property Insurance FY 23/24 VEHICLES PHYSICAL DAMAGE I... Property Insurance FY 23/24 MECHANICAL INSURANCE PR... Property Insurance FY 23/24 REFUND INSURANCE PREMIU... Property Insurance FY 23/24 EARTHQUAKE/FLOOD INSURA... Earthquake Insurance 504-1010-60441 395,165.00 504-1010-60452 269,483.00 504-1010-60443 164,283.00 504-1010-60443 7,971.00 504-1010-60443 17,086.00 504-1010-60443 3,462.00 504-1010-60443 -5,275.00 504-1010-60447 242,000.00 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 1,094,175.00 FY 23/24 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION EXCE... Annual PARS Contribution 760-0000-50199 12,832.86 Fund 760 - SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN Total: 12,832.86 Grand Total: 1,267,328.94 7/24/2023 4:05:27 PM 22 Page 3 of 5 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03516 - 07/07/2023 JB Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 504 - INSURANCE FUND 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN Account Number 101-0000-20325 101-1002-60351 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60400 101-1005-60420 101-1006-60351 101-1006-60410 101-2001-60168 101-2002-60116 101-2002-61101 101-2002-61200 101-2002-61400 101-3005-60351 101-3005-60431 101-3005-61102 101-3005-61103 101-3005-61105 101-3005-61106 101-3005-61108 101-3005-61109 101-3005-61110 101-3005-61111 101-3005-61113 101-3005-61114 101-3005-61115 101-3005-61201 101-3005-61202 101-3005-61203 101-3005-61204 101-3005-61205 101-3005-61209 101-3008-60116 101-3008-60196 101-3008-61101 101-3008-61200 101-6001-60351 101-6002-60351 101-6003-60118 101-7006-60146 201-7003-60429 201-7003-61101 202-3004-60116 202-3004-61101 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Due to County Recorder Membership Dues Annual Wellness Dollar ... Consultants/Employee 5... Office Supplies Operating Supplies Membership Dues Printing School Officer Pest Control Electricity - Utilities Water - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Membership Dues Materials/Supplies Electric - Monticello Park... Electric - Civic Center Pa... Electric - Fritz Burns Park... Electric - Sports Complex... Electric - Colonel Paige -... Electric - Community Par... Electric - Adams Park - Ut.. Electric - Velasco Park - ... Electric - Eisenhower Par... Electric - Desert Pride - U.. Electric - SilverRock Even... Water -Monticello Park -... Water - Civic Center Park.. Water -Eisenhower Park ... Water -Fritz Burns Park-... Water -Velasco Park - Uti.. Water -Community Park ... Pest Control Annual Permits/Inspecti... Electricity - Utilities Water - Utilities Membership Dues Membership Dues Plan Checks PM 10 - Dust Control Traffic Control Signs Electricity - Utilities Pest Control Electricity - Utilities Expense Amount 99,332.85 1,100.04 7,946.94 28,756.62 1,784.13 4,800.00 14,259.50 2,340.00 1.00 1,094,175.00 12,832.86 1,267,328.94 Expense Amount 50.00 4,856.00 200.00 396.00 213.99 771.80 95.00 325.98 18,706.22 4,024.20 1,771.13 872.31 100.70 295.00 2,411.81 13.65 3,653.23 1,300.81 2,906.64 12.34 5,473.70 47.70 13.99 19.08 13.33 4,077.51 3,650.60 4,721.72 143.53 2,577.20 191.58 5,967.66 6,524.60 1,129.00 19,425.28 765.36 125.00 250.00 1,050.00 189.20 444.84 655.20 843.60 5,037.90 7/24/2023 4:05:27 PM 23 Page 4 of 5 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03516 - 07/07/2023 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 202-3006-60116 Pest Control 592.80 202-3006-61101 Electricity - Utilities 1,472.64 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 1,520.00 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 6,674.68 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 2,522.98 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utiliti... 18,038.96 235-0000-61101 Electricity - Utilities 1,784.13 241-9101-60103 Professional Services 4,800.00 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable -750.50 401-0000-60188 Construction 15,010.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 2,340.00 503-0000-71060 Parks 1.00 504-1010-60441 Liability Insurance 395,165.00 504-1010-60443 Property Insurance 187,527.00 504-1010-60447 Earthquake Insurance 242,000.00 504-1010-60452 Workers Comp Premium 269,483.00 760-0000-50199 Annual PARS Contributi... 12,832.86 Grand Total: 1,267,328.94 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 1,253,069.44 202204CT Construction Expense Sports Complex Lighting Replacei 15,010.00 202204RP Retention Payable Sports Complex Lighting Replacei -750.50 Grand Total: 1,267,328.94 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 7/24/2023 4:05:27 PM 24 Page 5 of 5 Demand Register Za Q�ra City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03525 - 07/14/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101-GENERAL FUND GALLS LLC 211418 06/08/23 - CODE UNIFORMS Uniforms 101-6004-60690 33.94 GALLS LLC 211418 06/08/23 - CODE UNIFOMRS Uniforms 101-6004-60690 51.18 GALLS LLC 211418 06/13/23 - CODE UNIFORMS Uniforms 101-6004-60690 144.30 SECURE PRODUCTS CORPOR... 211443 04/13/23 - DAILY CASH BAGS SALES TAX Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -14.00 SECURE PRODUCTS CORPOR... 211443 04/13/23 - DAILY CASH BAGS Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 193.08 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 211400 06/24-07/23/23 - FS #93 CABLE (2415) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 113.90 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 211400 06/29-07/28/23 - FS #32 INTERNET (649... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 VINTAGE E & S INC 211462 06/26-06/30/23 - REPLACED CITY LIGHT ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 7,815.00 VINTAGE E & S INC 211462 06/27/23 - PVC CONDUIT INSTALL FOR 5... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 1,008.27 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 211390 06/19-06/23/23 - INSTALL CAT6 WIRE IT... Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 262.09 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 211456 06/26/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR EVENT ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 195.75 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 211456 06/28/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR EVENT ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 110.11 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 211456 06/28/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR EVENT ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 122.34 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 211456 06/28/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR EVENT ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 122.34 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 211456 06/28/23 - BASE ROCK FOR SRR EVENT ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 122.34 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATI... 211404 FY 23-24 RETAIL DEVELOPMENT CONT... Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 9,474.85 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATI... 211404 06/2023 - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT INFO... Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 861.35 PVP COMMUNICATIONS INC 211435 12/30/22 - MOTOR HELMET Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 1,288.17 AED BRANDS, LLC 211389 01/23/23 - AED BATTERY REPLACEMENT Non -Reimbursable Misc 101-2002-60445 4,935.59 SPARKLETTS 211445 06/14/23 & 06/28/23 - CITYWIDE DRINK... Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 239.31 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 211422 05/2023 - ONCALL PLAN CHECK SVCS E... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 10,955.00 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 211455 06/23-07/22/23 - EOC PHONE LINE SVC Telephone - Utilities 101-2002-61300 1,794.76 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH... 211411 7/28/22-4/5/23 - SRO RATE ADJ BP #1-10 School Officer 101-2001-60168 2,977.37 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH... 211411 04/06-05/03/23 - BP #11 SCHOOL RESO... School Officer 101-2001-60168 15,022.32 IRC CORPORATION 211423 06/2023 - PRE EMPLOYMENT BACKGRO... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 385.30 VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC 211459 06/30/23 - DATA BACK-UP FOR LASERFI... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 1,146.10 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 211409 06/30/23 - FB PARK BENCH INSTALLATI... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 10,800.00 SURVIVAL MODE 211452 06/28/23 - EMPLOYEE 1 DAY SURVIVAL ... Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 457.94 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 211393 03/01-05/31/23 - BANK FEES Administration 101-1006-60102 3,077.31 CIVICPLUS, LLC 211401 FY 23/24 LQ MUNICIPAL CODE ONLINE ... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 210.00 CIVICPLUS, LLC 211401 FY 23/24 LQ MUNICIPAL CODE ONLINE ... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 1,149.75 VAN DERMYDEN MAKUS LA... 211458 06/23/23 - WORKPLACE CLIMATE ASSES... Professional Services 101-1004-60103 8,945.50 CIVICPLUS, LLC 211401 FY 23/24 LQ MUNICIPAL CODE CODIFIC... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 2,560.00 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 211432 06/30/23 - RETURN DESK PAD Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 -15.65 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 211432 06/23/23 - 2024 WALL CALENDARS Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 179.38 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 211432 06/27/23 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 124.88 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 211432 06/23/23 - BINDING COVERS Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 50.01 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 211432 06/23/23 - PAPER PLATES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 16.46 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 211432 06/26/23 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 284.32 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 211432 06/27/23 - RETURN DESK PAD Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 -15.65 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 211448 6/19/23 STAND UP DESK CONVERTER C... Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 677.71 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 211448 06/26/23 - CITYWIDE PRINTING PAPER Forms, Copier Paper 101-1007-60402 599.79 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 211448 06/26/23 - CITYWIDE PRINTING PAPER Forms, Copier Paper 101-1007-60402 257.05 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 211448 06/29/23 - OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPIL Office Supplies 101-3005-60400 101.79 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 211448 06/30/23 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 394.51 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 211429 06/29/23 - UNIFORM CAPS Uniforms 101-3005-60690 326.14 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 211444 07/03/23 - ROCK BASE FOR SRR EVENT... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 118.50 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 211444 07/10/23 - LANDSCAPE ROCK Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 4,447.88 PRYOR LEARNING, INC. 211434 FY 23/24 FRED PRYOR TRAINING C.VILL... Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 249.00 PRYOR LEARNING, INC. 211434 FY 23/24 FRED PRYOR TRAINING M.GO... Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 249.00 PRYOR LEARNING, INC. 211434 FY 23/24 FRED PRYOR TRAINING T.SUD... Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 249.00 BRIGHT EVENT RENTALS, LLC 211398 05/24-06/27/23 - TEMPORARY SHADE F... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 2,296.90 STERICYCLE, INC 211449 05/26/23 - POLICE SHRED LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 19.25 7/24/2023 2:31:43 PM Page 1 of 8 25 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03525 - 07/14/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount KONE INC 211426 07/01-09/30/23 - CH ELEVATOR MAINT... Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 682.89 VERIZON WIRELESS 211460 05/26-06/25/23 - LQPD CELL (6852) Telephone - Utilities 101-2001-61300 887.73 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 211405 FY 23/24 LAFCO FEES Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 9,762.39 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SE... 211408 05/2023 - ANIMAL SERVICES Animal Shelter Contract Servi.., 101-6004-60197 30,923.12 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 211451 05/2023 - SUNLINE PASSES Due to SunLine 101-0000-20305 210.00 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 211451 05/2023 - SUNLINE PASSES Miscellaneous Revenue 101-0000-42301 -11.00 GOVOS, INC. 211421 07/2023 PERMITTING SOFTWARE FOR 5... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 3,820.00 MAYSELS, SUSAN MULLIN 211427 06/19 & 06/30/23 - CLERK'S OFFICE ASSI... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 630.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 211416 06/26-07/25/23 - POLICE INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2001-61400 528.94 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 211416 06/28-07/27/23 - SPORTS COMPLEX PH... Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 52.71 SANCHEZ, TOMMI 211441 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 MENDEZ, MARTHA 211428 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 GHERA, EDWARD R 211420 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 189.17 ORTEGA, VIRGINIA 211433 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 FLORES, TANIA 211415 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 MOLINA, ELIZABETH 211430 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 SUDAKOFF, TOBY A. 211450 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 181.61 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/28/23 - FLEET CERTIFICATE A.BERU... Travel & Training 101-3008-60320 2,700.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/07/23 - SKILLPATH TRAINING J.MIG... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 149.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - SKILLPATH MEMBERSHIP C.E... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 349.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - SKILLPATH MEMBERSHIP M.... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 349.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 05/31/23 - QSP & QSD CERTIFICATE B.M... Travel & Training 101-7006-60320 125.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/05/23 - APWA LUNCHEON C.ESCARR... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 45.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/05/23 - APWA LUNCHEON A.CABERA Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 45.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/05/23 - APWA LUNCHEON J.MIGNO... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 40.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/05/23 - APWA LUNCHEON M.LERMA Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 45.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/05/23 - APWA LUNCHEON B.MCKIN... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 40.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/21/23 - SAFETY BOOTS FOR E.SANAB... Safety Gear 101-7006-60427 201.18 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - ERGO MOUSE #361 SALES T... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -6.56 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 6/5/23 BEANBAGS FOR CIVIC CENTER C... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -7.44 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/29/23 - LIFE LINE VOUCHERS (8) Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 1,184.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/23/23 - SENIOR PLANNER JOB POSTI... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 50.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/05/23 - INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH P... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 73.35 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/02/23 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYST JO ... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 375.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/06/23 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYST JO ... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 300.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/02/23 - SENIOR PLANNER JOB POST Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 250.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/05/23 - BEANBAGS FOR CIVIC CENTE... Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 108.44 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 FIRE MARSHAL ONLINE ACCESS.. Membership Dues 101-2002-60351 114.99 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/23/23 - FIRE WRAP GRIP KIT Fire Station 101-2002-60670 70.52 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 SPROUT SOCIAL MEMBERSHIP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 1,188.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 07/2023 - APPLE MUSIC/STORAGE Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 22.95 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 SMASH BALLOON SUBSCRIPTI... Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 98.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/07/23 - PRINTER INK Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 57.61 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/07/23 - SCREEN CLEANER Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 20.53 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - PLANNERS (3) Office Supplies 101-1004-60400 63.63 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/08/23 - ERGO CHAIR FOR HUB Operating Supplies 101-1006-60420 185.95 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/09/23 - ERGO CHAIR & CHARGERS F... LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 573.42 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/23/23 - LABEL MAKER FOR POLICE LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 107.66 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/20/23 - POWER STRIP SURGES (2) LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 36.96 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/09/23 - POWER STRIP FOR POLICE LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 10.86 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/09/23 - POWER STRIP FOR POLICE LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 10.86 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/12/23 - DRIP TRAY & COFFEE MAKER... Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 317.10 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/01/23 - CORNHOLE BAGS & PING PO... Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 205.47 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/01/23 -TENNIS BALLS Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 35.85 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/2023 - MAILCHIMP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 193.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/23/23 - SAFETY BOOTS Safety Gear 101-3008-60427 91.30 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 05/31/23 - GLASS WHITEBOARD Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 141.36 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/21/23 - ELECTROLYTE POWDER PAC... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 112.28 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/05/23 - ADJUSTABLE BENCH Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 347.99 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/2023 - DESERT SUN Subscriptions & Publications 101-6001-60352 11.98 7/24/2023 2:31:43 PM Page 2 of 8 26 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03525 - 07/14/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/08/23 - MOUSE PAD Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 9.66 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/08/23 - CLEANING DUSTERS Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 18.17 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/08/23 - ERGO OFFICE CHAIR FOR D&D Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 199.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/07/23 - PANTS FOR CODE Uniforms 101-6004-60690 75.81 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/21/23 - HARD HAT Safety Gear 101-7006-60427 21.50 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/21/23 - SAFETY VESTS (3) Safety Gear 101-7006-60427 72.06 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 CCAC MEMBERSHIP T.FLORES Membership Dues 101-6001-60351 250.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 07/06/23 - DVBA LUNCHEON S.FERNAN... Travel & Training 101-6002-60320 45.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/27/23 - DINNER FOR PLANNING MEE... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 196.32 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/01/23 - BUILDING CODE BOOKS Subscriptions & Publications 101-6003-60352 86.73 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/07/23 - BUILDING CODE BOOKS Subscriptions & Publications 101-6003-60352 52.14 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/27/23 - BUILDING CODE BOOKS Subscriptions & Publications 101-6003-60352 73.95 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/01/23 - BUILDING CODE BOOKS Subscriptions & Publications 101-6003-60352 139.14 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/12/23 - UNIFORMS Uniforms 101-6003-60690 1,021.60 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/26/23 - WATER BROOMS SALES TAX Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -70.58 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/26/23 - WATER BROOMS Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 877.21 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/23/23 - STANDING DESK FOR S.BARK... Operating Supplies 101-1002-60420 798.25 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/19/23 - 18OZ RAMBLERS (150) Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 4,649.06 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 6/22/23 - CARRY STRAPS FOR FIRE STAT... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -13.11 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - FIRE HOOKS FOR FS #93 SAL... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -27.30 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - IDENTIFIERS FOR FIRE STATI... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -22.05 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 07/06-07/07/23 - CPPB EXAM D.ARME... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 395.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY23/24 CSMFO MEMBERSHIP S.LAURE... Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 50.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 FIRE MARSHAL ONLINE ACCESS.. Membership Dues 101-2002-60351 1,056.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - FIRE HOOKS FOR FS #93 Fire Station 101-2002-60670 339.30 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - IDENTIFIERS FOR FIRE STATI... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 294.05 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - CARRY STRAPS FOR FIRE STA... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 174.55 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/27/23 - CREDIT CARD MACHINE TEST... Administration 101-1006-60102 -8.50 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/27/23 - CREDIT CARD MACHINE TEST... Administration 101-1006-60102 8.50 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/08/23 - CPPB EXAM D.ARMENDARIZ Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 315.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/01/23 - STAND UP DESK D.BATUTA Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 464.91 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/15/23 - NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH ... LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 82.14 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/21/23 - FOOD BARS FOR EOC Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 554.85 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/26/23 - LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERE... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 3,250.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/26/23 - LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERE... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 650.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/14/23 - CVAG ASSEMBLY S.SANCHEZ Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 75.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/20/23 - COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 222.23 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/06/23 - COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 164.60 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/20/23 - COUNCIL MEETING DRINKS Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 7.79 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/14/23 - CVAG ASSEMBLY J.PENA Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 75.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/14/23 - CVAG ASSEMBLY L.EVANS Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 75.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/14/23 - CVAG ASSEMBLY K.FITZPATR... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 75.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/14/23 - CVAG ASSEMBLY D.MCGARR... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 75.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/14/23 - CVAG ASSEMBLY J.MCMILLEN Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 75.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 09/25-09/29/23 - MSA TRAINING FOR ... Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 770.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 08/27-08/30/23 - PWX CONFERENCE T.... Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 365.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 CCAC MEMBERSHIP M.RADEVA Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 CCAC MEMBERSHIP N.FUENTES Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 CCAC MEMBERSHIP L.LORETT Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 CCAC MEMBERSHIP O.MOJICA Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 CCAC MEMBERSHIP L.MCGINL... Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 5/30-6/1/23 LASERFICHE CONFERENCE ... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 601.92 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 5/30-6/1/23 LASERFICHE CONFERENCE ... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 671.92 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 05/31/23 - LASERFICHE CONFERENCE L... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 21.17 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - NOTARY EXAM & SUPPLIES 0.. Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 673.75 KILEY & ASSOCIATES 211425 06/2023 - FEDERAL LOBBYIST SERVICES Contract Services - Administr... 101-1002-60101 3,500.00 CAMILLE BARBER 211399 06/23/23 - CITATION REDUCED LQ2004... Administrative Citations 101-0000-42700 2,100.00 EISENHOWER MEDICAL CEN... 211412 05/19/23 -SEXUAL ASSULAT EXAM LA2... Sexual Assault Exam Fees 101-2001-60193 1,200.00 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC. 211436 07/13-10/12/23 - CITYWIDE POSTAGE ... Postage Machine 101-1007-60661 2,998.27 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 211431 07/04/23 - FB POOL EXTRA CLEANING Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 225.00 7/24/2023 2:31:43 PM Page 3 of 8 27 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03525 - 07/14/202316 Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PUBL... 211406 06/2023 - RADIO MAINTENANCE Operating Supplies 101-2001-60420 310.68 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 211461 01/10/23 - PLANTS FOR ADAMS PARK Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,252.59 ROADPOST USA INC. 211439 06/23-07/22/23 - EOC SATELLITE PHON... Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 200.85 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECT... 211463 06/14/23 - ELECTRICAL WIRE Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 289.95 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECT... 211463 06/15/23 - ELECTRICAL WIRING Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 695.20 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 211424 07/03/23 - SRR EVENT HVAC MAINTEN... HVAC 101-3008-60667 377.02 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 211438 05/25-06/24/23 - MOTOR FUEL CHARGES Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 427.54 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & R... 211453 04/01-06/30/23 - SPHERE ANNEXATION ... Professional Services 101-6002-60103 2,180.25 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 193,596.41 Fund: 201- GAS TAX FUND MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 211429 06/29/23 - UNIFORM CAPS Uniforms 201-7003-60690 326.14 UNDERGROUND SERVICE AL... 211457 07/01/23 - DIG ALERT SERVICES Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 157.00 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/27/23 - CONCRETE MIXER RENTAL Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 711.53 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/27/23 - CONCRETE MIXER RENTAL D... Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 -440.00 Fund 201- GAS TAX FUND Total: 754.67 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND KONE INC 211426 07/01-09/30/23 - MUSEUM ELEVATOR ... Maintenance/Services 202-3006-60691 682.89 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 682.89 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND VINTAGE E & S INC 211462 06/26-06/30/23 - REPLACED CITY LIGHT ... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 4,200.00 VINTAGE E & S INC 211462 06/21-06/26/23 -TROUBLESHOOTING L... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 3,038.94 SPARKLETTS 211446 06/14/23 & 06/28/23 - DRINKING WATER Operating Supplies 215-7004-60420 254.68 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 211448 06/29/23 - OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPL... Operating Supplies 215-7004-60420 173.82 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 211410 07/06/23 - ELECTRICAL WIRE & PARTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 2,062.94 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 211410 07/07/23 - PVC CONDUIT Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 14.45 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 9,744.83 Fund: 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND ALPHA MEDIA LLC 211392 06/2023 - RECYCLING RADIO ADS 93.7 K... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 1,488.63 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 211392 06/2023 - RECYCLING RADIO ADS MIX 1... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 1,490.06 Fund 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total: 2,978.69 Fund: 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) EVERBRIDGE, INC. 211414 FY 23/24 ALERT & WARNING SYSTEM Tools/Equipment 226-0000-60432 9,750.00 Fund 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) Total: 9,750.00 Fund: 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 IEDC MEMBERSHIP G.VILLALP... Membership Dues 247-0000-60351 1,850.00 Fund 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Total: 1,850.00 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 211403 04/29-05/26/23 - MATERIALS TESTING 5... Technical 401-0000-60108 4,740.00 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC 211447 06/2023 - ONCALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAI... Construction 401-0000-60188 3,662.06 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC 211447 06/30/23 - ONCALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MA... Construction 401-0000-60188 360.00 CONVERGINTTECHNOLOGIES.. 211402 06/28/23 - CITYWIDE CAMERA SYSTEM... Construction 401-0000-60188 3,521.25 CONVERGINTTECHNOLOGIES.. 211402 06/28/23 - CITYWIDE CAMERA SYSTEM... Construction 401-0000-60188 3,521.25 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 15,804.56 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT GARCIA SANCHEZ, IBAN 211419 07/01/23 -VEHICLE WASHES Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 590.00 SEBMIA AUTO GLASS 211442 06/01/23 - 2022 CHEVY COLORADO WI... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 325.00 TOWER ENERGY GROUP 211454 06/16-06/30/23 - FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 4,507.69 S&D CARWASH MANAGEME... 211440 06/2023 -CAR WASH MEMBERSHIP Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 819.59 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - PARTS FOR VACTRON VACU... Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 881.31 FUELMAN 211417 06/2023 - FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 874.13 QUINN COMPANY 211437 06/30/23 - NOZZLE & GASKET FOR SKID ... Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 63.64 QUINN COMPANY 211437 07/06/23 - RETURN GASKET Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 -6.18 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 8,055.18 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 211400 04/15-06/14/23 - WC CABLE (8105) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 309.32 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 211400 06/20-07/19/23 - WC CABLE (1909) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11.59 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 211400 06/24-07/23/23 - WC CABLE (4601) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 289.70 7/24/2023 2:31:43 PM Page 4 of 8 28 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03525 - 07/14/202316 Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVI... 211388 07/2023 - IT SERVICES Consultants 502-0000-60104 DELL MARKETING LP 211407 05/16/23 - IT COMPUTER PURCHASES Computers 502-0000-80103 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 211455 06/23-07/22/23 - PHONE LINE SVC Telephone - Utilities 502-0000-61300 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 211416 06/25-07/24/23 - CH INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 211416 06/27-07/26/23 - BLACKHAWK/LQ PARK... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 PHOTOSHOP D.HANSEN Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 UBIQ SUBSCRIPTION M.GONZ... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 ABOBE FOR CLERK'S OFFICE Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 ABOBE HOMEBASE J.DELGADO Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 FY 23/24 CANCEL ABOBE HOMEBASE 1.... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 07/2023 HULU SUBSCRIPTION Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/2023 - ADOBE HOMEBASE J.DELGADO Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/01-06/30/23 - EMAIL SPAM PROTECT.. Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/21/23 - KEYBOARD/MOUSE COMBO ... Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/02/23 - ERGO CHAIR FOR IT DEPART... Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/12/23 - IPHONE CHARGERS (2) Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/12/23 - KEYBOARD & MOUSE PAD M... Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/21/23 - DOCKING STATION Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/19/23 - COMPUTER MONITORS FOR ... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 EMPHASYS 211413 FY 23/24 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO MA... Maintenance Agreements 502-0000-60300 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/20/23 - PARK BENCHES (2) Parks 503-0000-71060 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total: Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVIC... 211391 FY 23/24 CRIME INSURANCE Crime Insurance 504-1010-60446 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/27/23 - ERGO DESK & ARMS #372 Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - ERGO MOUSE #361 Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 BANK OF THE WEST 211394 06/22/23 - ERGO MOUSE #371 Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: Grand Total: 28,390.00 3,527.41 3,787.41 100.09 95.09 239.88 725.70 19.99 239.88 -239.88 74.99 12.99 449.00 217.45 239.24 20.80 238.14 210.93 1,654.74 4,637.10 45,251.56 2,787.25 2,787.25 1,800.00 648.42 81.56 135.46 2,665.44 293,921.48 7/24/2023 2:31:43 PM Page 5 of 8 29 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03525 - 07/14/2023 JB Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRAN... 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 504 - INSURANCE FUND Account Number 101-0000-20304 101-0000-20305 101-0000-42301 101-0000-42700 101-1001-60320 101-1002-60101 101-1002-60320 101-1002-60351 101-1002-60400 101-1002-60420 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60103 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60129 101-1004-60400 101-1005-60103 101-1005-60320 101-1005-60351 101-1005-60400 101-1006-60102 101-1006-60320 101-1006-60351 101-1006-60400 101-1006-60420 101-1007-60402 101-1007-60403 101-1007-60661 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60168 101-2001-60175 101-2001-60176 101-2001-60193 101-2001-60420 101-2001-61300 101-2001-61400 101-2002-60351 101-2002-60406 101-2002-60445 101-2002-60670 101-2002-61300 101-2002-61304 101-2002-61400 101-3002-60420 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Sales Taxes Payable Due to SunLine Miscellaneous Revenue Administrative Citations Travel & Training Contract Services - Admi... Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Operating Supplies Annual Wellness Dollar ... Professional Services Consultants/Employee S... Recruiting/Pre-Employm... Office Supplies Professional Services Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Administration Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Operating Supplies Forms, Copier Paper Citywide Supplies Postage Machine LQ Police Volunteers School Officer Special Enforcement Fu... Sheriff - Other Sexual Assault Exam Fees Operating Supplies Telephone - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Membership Dues Disaster Prep Supplies Non -Reimbursable Misc Fire Station Telephone - Utilities Mobile/Cell Phones/Sate... Cable/Internet - Utilities Operating Supplies Expense Amount 193,596.41 754.67 682.89 9,744.83 2,978.69 9,750.00 1,850.00 15,804.56 8,055.18 45,251.56 2,787.25 2,665.44 293,921.48 Expense Amount -161.04 210.00 -11.00 2,100.00 4,019.62 3,500.00 725.00 20,098.59 78.14 798.25 1,370.78 8,945.50 1,184.00 1,433.65 63.63 9,515.85 1,968.76 1,250.00 733.94 3,077.31 710.00 50.00 942.31 185.95 856.84 239.31 2,998.27 841.15 17,999.69 1,288.17 427.54 1,200.00 310.68 887.73 528.94 1,170.99 1,012.79 4,935.59 878.42 1,794.76 200.85 213.89 666.86 7/24/2023 2:31:43 PM 30 Page 6 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03525 - 07/14/2023 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3003-60149 Community Experiences 2,296.90 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... 225.00 101-3005-60400 Office Supplies 101.79 101-3005-60431 Materials/Supplies 6,491.85 101-3005-60432 Tools/Equipment 877.21 101-3005-60690 Uniforms 326.14 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 19,623.27 101-3005-61300 Telephone - Utilities 52.71 101-3007-60134 Promotional Items 4,649.06 101-3007-60351 Membership Dues 1,501.95 101-3008-60123 Security & Alarm 262.09 101-3008-60320 Travel & Training 2,700.00 101-3008-60427 Safety Gear 91.30 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 601.63 101-3008-60667 HVAC 377.02 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 682.89 101-6001-60320 Travel & Training 196.32 101-6001-60351 Membership Dues 250.00 101-6001-60352 Subscriptions & Publicat... 11.98 101-6001-60400 Office Supplies 27.83 101-6001-60420 Operating Supplies 199.00 101-6002-60103 Professional Services 2,180.25 101-6002-60320 Travel & Training 45.00 101-6003-60352 Subscriptions & Publicat... 351.96 101-6003-60690 Uniforms 1,021.60 101-6004-60197 Animal Shelter Contract ... 30,923.12 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 677.71 101-6004-60690 Uniforms 305.23 101-6006-60320 Travel & Training 747.00 101-7001-60320 Travel & Training 1,062.00 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 10,955.00 101-7003-60320 Travel & Training 1,135.00 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 985.15 101-7006-60320 Travel & Training 125.00 101-7006-60427 Safety Gear 294.74 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 428.53 201-7003-60690 Uniforms 326.14 202-3006-60691 Maintenance/Services 682.89 215-7004-60420 Operating Supplies 428.50 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 2,077.39 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 7,238.94 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutio... 2,978.69 226-0000-60432 Tools/Equipment 9,750.00 247-0000-60351 Membership Dues 1,850.00 401-0000-60108 Technical 4,740.00 401-0000-60188 Construction 11,064.56 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 5,381.82 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 938.77 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 1,734.59 502-0000-60104 Consultants 28,390.00 502-0000-60300 Maintenance Agreements 4,637.10 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 1,447.56 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 715.63 502-0000-61300 Telephone - Utilities 3,787.41 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 880.78 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 1,865.67 502-0000-80103 Computers 3,527.41 503-0000-71060 Parks 2,787.25 7/24/2023 2:31:43 PM 31 Page 7 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03525 - 07/14/2023 JB Account Number 504-1010-60420 504-1010-60446 Project Account Key **None** 201804E 202003CT 202204T 202216E 2223TMICT CSA152E SOITN STVRE XPARKE Account Summary Account Name Operating Supplies Crime Insurance Grand Total: Project Account Summary Project Account Name **None** Landscape & Lighting Median Islan... Construction Expense Technical Expense General PW Maint - Desert Concep.. Construction Expense CSA 152 Expenses SOI - Sphere of Influence Terra No... Short Term Vacation Rental Expen... X Park Expenses Grand Total: Expense Amount 865.44 1,800.00 293,921.48 Project Name Expense Amount **None** 254,974.52 Landscape & Lighting Median Islz 3,038.94 Citywide Public Safety Camera Sy 7,042.50 Sports Complex Lighting Replacei 4,740.00 General PW Maintenance - Desei 10,800.00 FY22/23 Traffic Maintenance Imf 4,022.06 CSA 152 Project Tracking 1,006.31 (SOI) Sphere of Influence Fiscal S1 2,180.25 Short Term Vacation Rental Tracl 3,820.00 X Park 2,296.90 293,921.48 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 7/24/2023 2:31:43 PM 32 Page 8 of 8 Demand Register Za City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03533 - 07/21/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101-GENERAL FUND WILLDAN 211510 04/2023 - PW ONCALL PLAN CHECKING ... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 1,365.00 WILLDAN 211510 04/2023 - PW ONCALL PLAN CHECKING ... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 1,820.00 INDIO FLORIST 211483 05/29/23 - WREATH FOR MEMORIAL D... Community Special Events 101-1001-60137 32.63 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 211472 07/03-08/02/23 - FS #93 INTERNET (351... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 GARDAWORLD 211480 07/2023 - ARMORED SERVICE Professional Services 101-1006-60103 297.11 SIGNATURE TINT 211502 PICKLEBALL SIGNS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 258.60 DATA TICKET, INC. 211474 06/2023 - CODE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 689.10 DATA TICKET, INC. 211474 06/2023 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 207.71 CACEO 211468 07/19/23 - WEBINAR K.MEREDITH Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 60.00 CACEO 211468 09/05/23 - WEBINAR K.MEREDITH Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 54.00 CACEO 211468 09/19/23 - WEBINAR K.MEREDITH Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 36.00 CACEO 211468 09/05/23 - WEBINAR B.RODRIGUEZ Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 54.00 CACEO 211468 09/19/23 - WEBINAR B.RODRIGUEZ Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 36.00 CACEO 211468 09/05/23 - WEBINAR P.VILLANUEVA Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 54.00 CACEO 211468 09/19/23 - WEBINAR P. VILLANUEVA Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 36.00 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH... 211477 06/01-06/30/23 - BP #13 SCHOOL RESO... School Officer 101-2001-60168 2,019.86 JENSEN, SHARLA W 211486 07/13/23 - 1 DAY SESSION CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 96.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 211486 07/2023 - PERSONAL TRAINING 6 SESSI... Instructors 101-3002-60107 264.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 211486 06/2023 - PERSONAL TRAINING 6 SESSI... Instructors 101-3002-60107 264.00 SHIRY, TERESA 211501 07/13/23 - BALLROOM BEGINNING CLA... Instructors 101-3002-60107 99.75 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 211511 07/2023 - PILATES & GENTLE YOGA CLA... Instructors 101-3002-60107 217.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 211486 07/2023 - PERSONAL TRAINING 3 SESSI... Instructors 101-3002-60107 396.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 211508 06/27-06/30/23 - LANDSCAPE SERVICES Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 2,880.00 ANSAFONE CONTACT CENTE... 211466 07/2023 - PM 10 ANSWERING SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 152.89 CACEO 211468 FY 23/24 CACEO MEMBERSHIP C.WOODS Membership Dues 101-6004-60351 100.00 MOTION PICTURE LICENSING... 211492 08/30/23-08/29/24 - WC MOTION PICT... Membership Dues 101-3002-60351 346.38 ROBERT HALF 211500 06/30/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 ROBERT HALF 211500 07/07/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICE Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,312.65 MACIAS NURSERY, INC. 211489 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,049.44 GRAINGER 211482 COFFEE Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 33.69 GRAINGER 211482 HYDRATION SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 555.86 VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS 211509 FY 22/23 ADDITIONAL FUNDING -BUD A... VGPS - Visit Greater Palm Spr... 101-3007-60151 69,091.00 VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS 211509 FY 23/24 QTR 1 CITY FUNDING VGPS - Visit Greater Palm Spr... 101-3007-60151 97,348.30 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 211473 FY 23/24 MEMBERSHIP DUES Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 65,943.00 MCGARREY, DEBORAH 211490 7/10/23 LEAGUE OF CA MEETING TRAVE.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 59.87 CASTRO, DANNY 211471 FY 22/23 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 12.11 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 05/31/23 - LUMBER (15) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 52.19 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/20/23 - PIPE HANGERS & RISER EXTR... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 28.25 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/08/23 - MEASURING WHEEL & LONG... Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 100.15 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/05/23 - CONDENSATE PUMP & SHAK... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 135.77 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/08/23 - WATER HOSE NOZZLES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 53.67 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/14/23 - DOOR KEYPAD Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 180.76 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/22/23 - GLOVES & PRIMER SPRAY Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 106.83 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 05/25/23 -TOWELS & AEROSOL SPRAY ... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 83.09 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 05/25/23 - SPRAY PAINT Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 31.03 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 05/29/23 - RATCHET & SOCKET EXTENSI... Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 60.92 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/02/23 - WATER COOLER Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 235.54 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/01/23 -TOOL APRON & HEX BOLTS Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 43.86 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/16/23 - SCISSORS & HAMMERS Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 100.03 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 211495 WADDING POOL MEDIA FILTER REPLAC... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 5,584.90 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 211495 FB POOL MEDIA FILTER REPLACEMENT Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 5,584.90 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 261,298.83 7/24/2023 7:31:59 PM Page 1 of 5 33 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03533 - 07/21/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVE... 211496 04/01-06/30/23 - QTR 4 MAKERSPACE ... Makerspace Operations 202-3009-60105 42,728.56 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVE... 211496 04/01-06/30/23 - QTR 4 MUSEUM CON... Museum Operations 202-3006-60105 33,751.94 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 211498 02/16/23 - LIBRARY BOILER HEATER MA... HVAC 202-3004-60667 1,408.55 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 77,889.05 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND LANDMARK GOLF MANAGE... 211487 05/2023 - SRR PERIMETER LANDSCAPE ... SilverRock Way Landscape 215-7004-60143 6,028.00 LANDMARK GOLF MANAGE... 211487 06/2023 - SRR PERIMETER LANDSCAPE ... SilverRock Way Landscape 215-7004-60143 5,278.00 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 211504 04/13/23 - LANDSCAPE ROCK Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 2,220.63 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 05/30/23 - WATER HOSES (5) Tools/Equipment 215-7004-60432 278.75 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 211476 70 LED LIGHT POLES FOR L & L Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 231,498.58 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 245,303.96 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 CITYWIDE MISC ADA IMPROV... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,675.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 - AVE 48 ART AND MUSIC LINE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 420.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 VILLAGE UNDERGROUND PJT F... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 6/2023 AVE 50 REHABILITATION WASH ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 5,177.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 2,100.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 - 2016-03 LANDSCAPE RENOVA... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,962.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 6/2023 FRED WARING DR PAVEMENT R... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 8,942.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 - 2021-02 FRITZ BURNS PARK I... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 425.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 - 2019-05 HIGHWAY 111 CORR... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 675.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS LAKE IRRIG CON... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 AVE 52 PAVEMENT REHAB MA... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,925.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 CIVIC CENTER ACTIVITIES PRO... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 700.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 - 2011-05 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,487.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 AVE 50 BRIDGE SPANNING THE... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,207.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 - 2019-01 VILLAGE ART/CULTU... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,575.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 6/2023 AVE 50 WIDENING IMPROVEME... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 525.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 211493 06/2023 - 2021-08 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT Professional Services 401-0000-60103 500.00 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 211497 06/2023 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE PROGR... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -34,541.67 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 211497 06/2023 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE PROGR... Construction 401-0000-60188 690,833.30 AMERICAN BUSINESS BANK 211465 06/2023 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE RETENT... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 34,541.67 GHD INC. 211481 02/2023 - HWY 111 CORRIDOR PLANNI... Design 401-0000-60185 18,667.58 GHD INC. 211481 03/2023 - HWY 111 CORRIDOR PLANNI... Design 401-0000-60185 9,366.25 STALKER RADAR 211503 SPEED LIMIT SIGN AND CARD SET Construction 401-0000-60188 327.31 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 749,366.94 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIV... 211467 07/02/23 - MOTORCYCLE REPAIR A1154 Motorcycle Repair & Mainte... 501-0000-60679 594.30 E&C TOWING INC. 211478 05/12/23 - VEHICLE TOW CHEVY 350OHD Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 150.00 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 744.30 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 211505 FY 23/24 JUL-MAY ANNUAL SERVICE Prepaid Expense 502-0000-13600 132,215.38 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 211505 FY 22/23- JUNE ANNUAL SERVICES Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 12,019.62 ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVI... 211464 SOFTWARE UPGRADES LABOR Consultants 502-0000-60104 562.50 DELL MARKETING LP 211475 COMPUTER REPAIR SERVICES Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 222.93 INTELESYSONE 211485 FY 23/24 PHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE Technical 502-0000-60108 16,800.72 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SO... 211484 04/01-06/30/23 - COPIER CONTRACT 0... Copiers 502-0000-60662 679.00 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES_ 211470 06/2023 METER USAGE Copiers 502-0000-60662 1,590.96 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES_ 211470 07/2023 CITY PRINTERS Copiers 502-0000-60662 1,793.99 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. 211499 06/2023 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 7,064.25 VERIZON WIRELESS 211506 06/02-07/01/23 - BACKUP SERVER (2183) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 66.17 VERIZON WIRELESS 211506 06/02-07/01/23 - CITY IPADS (5587) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 1,273.83 VERIZON WIRELESS 211506 06/02-07/01/23 - CITY CELL SVC (5496) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 3,116.36 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 211491 06/10-07/09/23 - MS AZURE ONLINE SV... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 749.29 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 211479 07/04-08/03/23 - DSL SVC Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 436.23 NATIX, INC. 211494 APPLE TV FOR WC CONFERENCE ROOM Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 470.29 7/24/2023 7:31:59 PM 34 Page 2 of 5 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03533 - 07/21/20231B Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount VERMONT SYSTEMS INC 211507 FY 23/24 MAINTENANCE REC TRAC SOF... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 6,031.94 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 185,093.46 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL P... 211469 6/2023 LQ PARK SPLASH PAD RENOVAT... Retention Payable 503-0000-20600 -12,284.50 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL P... 211469 6/2023 LQ PARK SPLASH PAD RENOVAT... Parks 503-0000-71060 245,690.00 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 211476 27 LED LIGHT POLES FOR PARKS Parks 503-0000-71060 98,727.33 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total: 332,132.83 Fund: 601- SILVERROCK RESORT LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 211488 06/07/23 - HARDWARE Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 36.02 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 36.02 Grand Total: 1,851,865.39 7/24/2023 7:31:59 PM 35 Page 3 of 5 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03533 - 07/21/2023 JB Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-1001-60137 101-1001-60320 101-1002-60351 101-1004-50252 101-1006-60103 101-2001-60168 101-2002-61400 101-3002-60107 101-3002-60351 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60432 101-3005-60691 101-3007-60151 101-3008-60431 101-3008-60432 101-6004-60111 101-6004-60320 101-6004-60351 101-6006-60125 101-7002-60183 101-7003-60420 101-7003-60432 101-7006-60146 202-3004-60667 202-3006-60105 202-3009-60105 215-7004-60143 215-7004-60431 215-7004-60432 401-0000-20600 401-0000-60103 401-0000-60185 401-0000-60188 501-0000-60676 501-0000-60679 502-0000-13600 502-0000-60104 502-0000-60108 502-0000-60301 502-0000-60420 502-0000-60662 502-0000-61301 502-0000-61400 503-0000-20600 503-0000-71060 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Community Special Even... Travel & Training Membership Dues Annual Wellness Dollar ... Professional Services School Officer Cable/Internet - Utilities Instructors Membership Dues Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... Materials/Supplies Tools/Equipment Maintenance/Services VGPS - Visit Greater Palm.. Materials/Supplies Tools/Equipment Administrative Citation ... Travel & Training Membership Dues Temporary Agency Servi... Map/Plan Checking Operating Supplies Tools/Equipment PM 10 - Dust Control HVAC Museum Operations Makerspace Operations SilverRock Way Landsca... Materials/Supplies Tools/Equipment Retention Payable Professional Services Design Construction Vehicle Repair & Maint... Motorcycle Repair & Ma... Prepaid Expense Consultants Technical Software Licenses Operating Supplies Copiers Cell/Mobile Phones Cable/Internet - Utilities Retention Payable Parks Expense Amount 261,298.83 77,889.05 245,303.96 749,366.94 744.30 185,093.46 332,132.83 36.02 1,851,865.39 Expense Amount 32.63 59.87 65,943.00 12.11 297.11 2,019.86 99.99 1,336.75 346.38 11,169.80 1,388.48 100.15 2,880.00 166,439.30 591.15 60.92 896.81 330.00 100.00 2,887.65 3,185.00 868.95 100.03 152.89 1,408.55 33,751.94 42,728.56 11,306.00 233,719.21 278.75 0.00 30,172.50 28,033.83 691,160.61 150.00 594.30 132,215.38 562.50 16,800.72 26,088.03 470.29 4,063.95 4,390.19 502.40 -12,284.50 344,417.33 7/24/2023 7:31:59 PM 36 Page 4 of 5 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03533 - 07/21/2023 JB Account Number 601-0000-60660 Project Account Key **None** 111205CT 111205P 111205RP 201603P 201606P 201804E 201901P 201902P 201905D 201905P 202008P 202102P 202108P 202201P 202203P 202205P 202206P 202208P 202214P 202219E 202219RP 202227P 202230P 2223PMPP 2223TMICT Account Summary Account Name Expense Amount Repair & Maintenance 36.02 Grand Total: 1,851,865.39 Project Account Summary Project Account Name **None** Construction Expense Professional Expense Retention Payable Professional Expense Professional Expense Landscape & Lighting Median Islan... Professional Expense Professional Expense Design Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense La Quinta Splash Pad Renovation Retention Payable Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Construction Expense Grand Total: Project Name **None** Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 La Quinta Landscape Renovation Civic Center Campus Lake/Irrigati Landscape & Lighting Median Islz Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the E Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan I Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan I Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Pr Fritz Burns Park Improvements FY 21/22 PMP Slurry Seal Improv Avenue 50 Pavement Rehab (Wa Fred Waring Drive Pavement Reh Avenue 50 Widening Improveme Village Utilities Undergrounding I Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Imp Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitate La Quinta Splash Pad Renovation La Quinta Splash Pad Renovation Civic Center Activities Promenadi Cove Trails Parking Lot Improver FY22/23 Pavement Management FY22/23 Traffic Maintenance Imf 1,851,865.39 Expense Amount 866,872.32 690,833.30 1,487.50 0.00 1,962.50 350.00 2,220.63 1,575.00 1,207.50 28,033.83 675.00 350.00 425.00 500.00 5,177.50 8,942.50 525.00 175.00 1,675.00 1,925.00 245,690.00 -12,284.50 700.00 420.00 2,100.00 327.31 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 7/24/2023 7:31:59 PM 37 Page 5 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 7/1/2023 — 7/21/2023 Wire Transaction Listed below are the wire transfers from 7/1/2023— 7/21/2023. Wire Transfers: 07/05/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK 07/07/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 07/07/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 07/07/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE 07/07/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE 07/10/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 07/10/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 07/10/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 07/11/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - STERLING HEALTH 07/12/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - BANK OF NEW YORK MELLOW 07/13/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MIDAMERICA 07/14/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - STANDARD OF OREGON 07/21/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER- LQCEA 07/21/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER- MISSION SQUARE 07/21/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER- MISSION SQUARE 07/21/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $163,676.22 $122,138.54 $468.00 $3,775.00 $9,987.28 $5,162.45 $16,542.19 $34,603.95 $1,460.39 $1,000,000.00 $15,947.33 $1,737.36 $477.00 $3,775.00 $10,201.28 $231,637.83 $1,621,589.82 38 City of La Quinta Purchase Orders 4/1/23 — 6/30/23 ATTACHMENT 3 Purchase Orders Listed below are Purchase Orders issued from 4/1/23 — 6/30/23 with a value between $25,000 and $50,000 for City Council's review. Vendor P.O Number Amount Purpose Courtmaster Sports, Inc. 2223-0217 $ 36,000.00 FB Park Tennis Court to Pickle Ball Conversion Downstream Services, Inc. 2223-0218 $ 27,824.00 Storm Water Infrastructure Inspection Service Van Dermyden Makus Law Corporation 2223-0224 $ 49,500.00 Workplace Climate Assessment Quick Crete Products Corp Old Town Artisan Studios 2223-0230 $ 32,605.49 2223-0229 $ 25,000.00 Ping Pong & Cornhole for Civic Center Campus FY22/23 Sponsorship 39 40 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR FINANCE AND HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE SERVICES RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 3 to Software as a Service Agreement with Tyler Technologies Inc. for Finance and Human Resources software services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • In July 2013, the City entered into a five-year agreement with Tyler Technologies Inc. (Tyler) for finance and human resources software services, which is an integral part of the City's daily operations and is used by all departments. • In September 2018, Amendment No. 1 was executed, extending the agreement for another five-year term through August 31, 2023. • In October 2021, Amendment No. 2 was executed, for the addition of Tyler Energov permitting and business license software. • Amendment No. 3 provides a five-year extension expiring August 31, 2028. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for year one, of the proposed five-year term extension, are budgeted in the fiscal year (FY) 2023/24 Information Technology Fund, Software Licenses (502-0000-60301). Amendment No. 3 provides a five-year extension at $93,070 annually. The total cost for the five-year term is estimated to be $465,350; with an additional 10% contingency bringing the total to $511,885. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In July 2013, following a thorough Request for Proposals and selection process, Tyler Technologies cloud based hosted software was selected as the City's finance and human resources software platform. The 2013 contract term was for five years with an option to extend for five additional years. In September 2018, Amendment No. 1 was executed, extending the agreement for another five-year term through August 31, 2023. 41 Amendment No. 2, executed in February 2022, added Tyler Energov permitting and business license software, which was approved in October 2021 following a Request for Proposals selection process. The City uses Tyler Incode as its financial software to process accounts payables, accounts receivables, purchase orders, general ledger accounting, payroll, capital project accounting, fixed assets, budgeting, and bank/investment reconciliations. The human resources department utilizes the system to onboard and track employment, including benefits. The Design and Development department will use the system for permitting, business licensing, GIS integration, and economic data reporting. The initial five-year agreement expires in August 2023. Staff has reviewed the contract and conducted an internal assessment and determined that the Payroll Electronic Interface will be removed as the City currently does not have the need for a payroll electronic time clock module. Amendment No. 3 provides a five-year extension for an estimated annual cost of $93,070, including a 10% contingency to account for potential annual increases or should the City decide to add additional services. The term of the amendment commences on September 1, 2023, and expires on August 31, 2028, automatically renewing for additional one-year terms at current fees, unless terminated in writing. The contract can be terminated in writing at any time without a termination penalty contingent upon a 60-day written notice. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to approve Amendment No. 3. This is not recommended as this software is an integral part of the City's daily operations and is used by all departments. Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment 1: Tyler Technologies Amendment to Software as a Service Agreement 42 Amendment 3 to Contract ID# 2013-0142 ATTACHMENT 1 • �# tyler Y tL?f'hnalogies AMENDMENT This amendment ("Amendment") is effective as of the date of signature of the last party to sign as indicated below ("Amendment Effective Date"), by and between Tyler Technologies, Inc. with offices at One Tyler Drive, Yarmouth, Maine 04096 ("Tyler") and the City of La Quinta, California, with offices at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253 ("Client"). WHEREAS, Tyler and the Client are parties to an agreement dated July 24, 2013 ("Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Term of the Agreement expires August 31, 2023 ("Expiration Date"); THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, Tyler and the Client agree as follows. 1. The following Tyler Software as a Service (SaaS) are hereby removed from the Agreement as of August 31, 2023: • Payroll Electronic Interface As of such date, Client's right to access the above -listed software is terminated, as are Tyler's obligations to maintain, support, host and update such software. Client's annual SaaS fees payment obligation commencing August 31, 2023, is hereby reduced, and reflected in the renewal amounts listed below with respect to the removal of the above - listed software. 2. SaaS Term. The term of the Agreement is hereby renewed for one (1) year commencing on the day following the Expiration Date (the "Renewal Term"). After the completion of the Renewal Term, the Agreement will renew automatically for additional one (1) year terms at our then -current SaaS Fees unless terminated in writing by either party at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the then -current term. We will provide you notice of any increase in SaaS Fees no less than sixty (60) days prior to the commencement of the renewal term. 3. SaaS Fees. SaaS Fees shall be prorated from September 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024, in the amount of $77,558.00 and will be invoiced upon the Amendment Effective Date. Thereafter SaaS Fees for the Renewal Term (7/1— 6/30 of each year) are $93,070.00. SaaS Fees are invoiced annually in advance, beginning on the commencement date of the Renewal Term. Subsequent annual SaaS Fees are invoiced annually in advance, beginning on the anniversary of the initial invoice date. 4. Users. The SaaS fees may be based on an unlimited number of users. % tyle� 43 Amendment to Contract ID# 2013-0142 5. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. 6. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, persons having been duly authorized and empowered to enter into this Amendment hereunto executed this Amendment effective as of the date last set forth below. Tyler Technologies, Inc. By: Name: Title: Date: City of La Quinta, CA By: Name: Title: Date: tyler 44 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT ',GENDA TITL` APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC, FOR ON -CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES, TO INCREASE THE COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Contract Services with Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. for on -call building code plan review and inspection services, increasing the compensation by $55,000 for fiscal year 2022/23; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The City has contracted with Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. (Interwest) for on -call building plan review and inspection services (Services) since 2018, following a Request for Proposals (RFP). • Due to increased workload and a staffing vacancy, additional funding is needed to meet current building activity reviews and inspections; and on February 21, 2023, Council approved a mid -year budget adjustment of $150,000 to provide the necessary resources to meet demand. • Amendment No. 3 requests to increase fiscal year (FY) 2022/23 compensation by $55,000. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Building Division Contract Services budget (101-6003-60118) for FY 2022/23 for this increase. TERM COMPENSATION Original Agreement 2018-2021 $324,000 per year Amendment No. 1 Optional 2-Year Term Extension 2021-2023 $324,000 per year Amendment No. 2 Increase Contract Sum 2022-2023 $116,000 additional compensation Amendment No. 3 Increase Contract Sum 2022-2023 $ 55,000 (proposed addition) TOTAL CONTRACT COMPENSATION FY 2022/23: $495,000 45 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In June 2018, the City published a RFP for the Services and received nine (9) proposals. Based on experience and qualifications three firms were selected — HR Green Pacific, Interwest, and Esgil Corporation, and all three firms were recommended to be retained to ensure services would be available when needed. The City's contract building plan review and inspection services encompass review of structural design and calculations, construction and occupancy type, means of egress, access and egress for persons with disabilities, electrical and plumbing design, adequate lighting, ventilation and energy conservation, and fire/life safety systems, in compliance with Title 24 California Building Standards Code. These consultants provide specialized expertise in these areas. On August 7, 2018, Council approved Agreements for Contract Services with all three firms to procure the Services, in an amount not to exceed $324,000 per FY for a three- year term through June 30, 2021. In June 2021, Amendment No. 1 was executed extending the term of the agreement with Interwest for a two-year term ending June 30, 2023. Due to increased workload and a staffing vacancy, additional funding is needed to meet current building activity reviews and inspections; and on February 21, 2023, Council approved a mid -year budget adjustment of $150,000 to provide the necessary resources to meet demand. On June 6, 2023, Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the agreement with Interwest increasing fiscal year 2022/23 compensation by $116,000 for a total not to exceed $440,000. Staff requests approval of proposed Amendment No. 3 to increase the not to exceed agreement amount for FY 2022/23 by $55,000, for a total not to exceed amount of $495,000 due to the increased workload. On May 19, 2023, the City published a RFP for the Services; and on June 20, 2023, Council approved new three-year agreements with 4Leaf, Inc., Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., HR Green Pacific, and Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. for these services. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to approve the Amendment. Prepared by: AJ Ortega, Building Official Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachment: 1. Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Contract Services ErT ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC. This Amendment No. 3 ("Amendment 6") to Agreement for Contract Services ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of July, 2023, ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation and INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC. ("Contracting Party"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about August 1, 2018, the City and Contracting Party entered into an Agreement to provide On -Call Building Plan Review and Inspection Services, for a total not to exceed amount of $324,000 per fiscal year. The term of the Agreement expired on June 20, 2021 ("Initial Term"); and WHEREAS, on or about July 1, 2021, the City and Contracting Party executed Amendment No. 1 and mutually agreed to extend the term of the Agreement for Two 2 additional year(s), from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023; compensation remained unchanged at $324,000 per fiscal year; and WHEREAS, on or about June 6, 2023, the City and Contracting Party executed Amendment No. 2 amending Section 2.1 Contract Sum of the Agreement to increase the not to exceed amount for fiscal year 2022/23 by an additional $116,000 due to additional demand for these services based on high workloads; the fiscal year 2022/23 total not to exceed amount is $440,000; and WHEREAS, City and Contracting Party mutually agree to amend Section 2.1 Contract Sum of the Agreement to increase the not to exceed amount for fiscal year 2022/23 by an additional $55,000 due to additional demand for these services based on high workload; the fiscal year 2022/23 total not to exceed amount is $495,000. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 2.1 Contract Sum of the Agreement, is amended to read as follows: Section 2.1 — Contract Sum of the Agreement. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in a total amount not to exceed Three Hundred Twenty -Four Thousand Dollars ($324,000) per year for fiscal years 47 2018/19 through 2021/22, and Four Hundred and Ninety -Five Thousand Dollars ($495,000) for fiscal year 2022/23, except as provided in Section 1.7. 2. Exhibit B — Schedule of Compensation is amended to read as listed in attached Exhibit B, incorporated herewith by this reference. In all other respects, the original Agreement shall remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Contracting Party have executed this Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement on the respective dates set forth below. CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation JON McMILLEN, City Manager City of La Quinta, California Dated: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Paul Meschino, President Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. pmeschino(a)-interwestgrp.com Dated: David Kniff, Assistant Secretary Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. Dkniff esgil.com Dated: 48 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is Three Hundred Twenty -Four Thousand Dollars ($324,000) per year, for fiscal years 2018/19 through 2021/22, and Four Hundred and Ninety -Five Thousand Dollars ($495,000) for fiscal year 2022/23. Contracting Party expressly acknowledges and agrees that the Contract Sum in this Agreement is the annual aggregate total amount covering this Agreement, that certain Agreement for Contract Services by and between the City and Esgil, and that certain Agreement for Contract Services by and between the City and HR Green Pacific, Inc., of or about even date as this Agreement, such that the Contract Sum as defined herein is the maximum amount available for services provided under all three agreements. The Contract Sum may be paid to Contracting Party in an amount identified in Contracting Party's schedule of compensation attached hereto for work tasks performed and properly invoices by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Initial Term: FY 2018/19 — not to exceed $324,000 FY 2019/20 — not to exceed $324,000 FY 2020/21 — not to exceed $324,000 Extended Term: FY 2021 /22 — not to exceed $324,000 FY 2022/23 — not to exceed $495,000 49 50 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE CITY PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S URBAN COUNTY PROGRAM FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2024-25, 2025-26, AND 2026-27 RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to authorize City participation in the County of Riverside's Urban County Program for Federal Fiscal Years 2024-25, 2025-26, and 2026-27; approving the Riverside County Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant Funds, Home Investment Partnership Program, and Emergency Solutions Grant Funds for Federal Fiscal Years 2024-25, 2025-26, and 2026-27; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. EXECU +-IVE SUMMARY • The County of Riverside (County) is currently in the process of applying for Urban County qualification with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Federal Fiscal Years 2023-24, 2024-25, and 2025-26. • For the County to participate and receive program funding for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnership (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) programs, the County must qualify as an Urban County. • As part of the HUD application process, the County must have Cooperation Agreements (Agreement) established with participating cities that cover the Urban County qualification period. • The City must enter into an Agreement with the County to be eligible to receive CDBG funds and to apply for HOME and ESG program funds. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with approval of the Agreement. Renewing the City's agreement with the County would provide a three-year revenue source for eligible CDBG projects. 51 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Act) funds the CDBG program. The CDBG program provides grants from HUD to local governments to provide adequate housing, suitable living environments, and expansion of economic opportunities to persons of very low, low, and moderate income. The City has participated in the CDBG program since 1983. The County's Economic Development Agency is in the process of requalifying as an Urban County with HUD, enabling the County to receive annual CDBG, HOME, and ESG program funds. The County acts as the intermediary between HUD and the City in the distribution of CDBG funds. City participation in the County's CDBG program automatically allows participation in the HOME and ESG programs. These programs do not require City staff support or funding; the City acts as a liaison by providing program information to interested residents. Key provisions of the Agreement include: ➢ City and County are obligated to take all actions necessary to assure compliance with all applicable federal statutes. ➢ City develops a Community Development Plan for the term of the Agreement. ➢ City must follow the approved Citizen Participation Plan. ➢ City certifies there is no undue influence in the appropriation of granted CDBG funds. ➢ The City cannot opt out of the CDBG program during the Agreement period. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer 52 RESOLUTION NO. 2023 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF LA QUINTA TO PARTICIPATE IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S URBAN COUNTY PROGRAM FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2024-25, 2025-26, AND 2026-27 WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta has elected to participate as unit of local government (Cooperating City) in the County of Riverside's Urban County Program for Federal Fiscal Years 2024-25, 2025-26, and 2026-27; and WHEREAS, the Cooperation Agreement will allow the County and City to carry- out activities which are funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds, and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG); and WHEREAS, the Cooperation Agreement will allow the Cooperating City to participate in the Urban County Consolidated Planning Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The Cooperation Agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of La Quinta is hereby approved and enclosed hereto as "Exhibit A" and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the City of La Quinta. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 1 St day of August, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 53 Resolution No. 2023 — XXX Riverside County Urban County Participation for CDBG, HOME, & ESG Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 2 of 2 LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 54 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX, EXHIBIT A ADOPTED: AUGUST 1, 2023 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT, HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM, AND EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2024-25, 2025-26, 2026-27 This Cooperation Agreement for the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships Program, and the Emergency Solutions Grant for Fiscal Years 2024-25, 2025-26, 2026-27, hereinafter referred to as "Agreement" is made and entered into this day of 2023, by and between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and CITY OF LA QUINTA, an incorporated municipality within the geographical boundaries of the COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as "CITY." City and County individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C.A. § 5301 et seq.) (Public Law 93-383), hereinafter called "ACT", provides that Community Development Block Grant funds hereinafter referred to as "CDBG", may be used for the support of activities that provide decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate -income; and WHEREAS, the HOME Investment Partnerships Act program, hereinafter referred to as "HOME," was enacted as Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, for the purposes of. expanding the supply of decent, affordable housing for low and very -low income families with emphasis on rental housing; building State and local capacity to carry out affordable housing programs; and providing for coordinated assistance to participants in the development of affordable low-income housing; and WHEREAS, the Emergency Solutions Grant, hereinafter referred to as "ESG," was authorized by the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act of 1987 and the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009. The objectives of the ESG program are to increase the number and quality of emergency shelters and transitional Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 1 of 16 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 housing facilities for homeless individuals and families, to operate these facilities and provide essential social services, and to help prevent homelessness; WHEREAS, CDBG regulations require counties to re -qualify as an Urban County under the CDBG program every three (3) years. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and the mutual benefits to be derived there from, the parties agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. (a). This Agreement gives COUNTY authority to undertake, or assist in undertaking, activities for Fiscal Years 2024-25, 2025-26, and 2026-27, that will be funded from the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds. COUNTY and CITY agree to cooperate, to undertake, or to assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower -income housing assistance activities. COUNTY is qualified as an "Urban County" under the ACT. CITY, by executing this Agreement, hereby gives notice of its election to participate in an Urban County's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships Act (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) programs, hereinafter referred to as "Urban County Programs". (b). By executing this Agreement, CITY understands that it may not apply for grants from appropriations under the Small Cities or State CDBG Programs for fiscal years during the period in which it participates in the Urban County's CDBG program, and that CITY may only participate in the HOME program through the COUNTY'S Urban County Programs, not a HOME consortium. The CITY may also apply for HOME funds from the State of California, if permitted by the State. (c). By executing this Agreement, CITY understands that it may only receive a formula allocation of ESG funds through the COUNTY'S Urban County Programs. The CITY may also apply for ESG funds from the State of California, if permitted by the State. 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be for three (3) years commencing on July 1, 2024, and expiring on June 30, 2027, unless an earlier date of termination is fixed by U.S. Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 2 of 16 56 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Department of Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter called HUD, pursuant to ACT. This Agreement shall automatically renew for participation in successive three-year qualification periods, unless COUNTY and CITY provide written notice it elects not to participate in a new qualification period. In the event of termination, a notice shall be sent to the HUD Field Office. Notwithstanding the above, the Parties agree that each Party shall adopt amendments to the Agreement incorporating changes necessary to meet the requirement for cooperation agreements set forth in an Urban County Qualification Notice that is applicable for any subsequent three-year urban qualification period and shall submit such amendment to HUD as provide in the Urban County Qualification Notice. The Parties agree that failure to comply shall void the automatic renewal for such qualification periods. During the term and any successive qualification periods should this Agreement automatically renew, the terms of this Agreement shall remain in effect until the CDBG funds and program income received with respect to activities carried out during the three-year qualification period are expended and the funded activities completed. Furthermore, neither the COUNTY nor the CITY may terminate or withdraw from this Agreement while it remains in effect. 3. PREPARATION OF FEDERALLY REOUIRED FUNDING APPLICATIONS. The County of Riverside Housing and Workforce Solutions, subject to approval of COUNTY's Board of Supervisors, shall be responsible for preparing and submitting to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), in a timely manner, all reports and statements required by the ACT and the Federal regulations promulgated by HUD to secure entitlement grant funding under the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs. This duty shall include the preparation and processing of COUNTY Housing, Community, and Economic Development Needs Identification Report, Citizen Participation Plan, the County Five -Year Consolidated Plan, One -Year Action Plan, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), and other related programs which satisfy the application requirements of ACT and its regulations. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 3 of 16 57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (a) COUNTY and CITY will comply with the applicable provisions of the ACT and those Federal regulations promulgated by HUD pursuant thereto, as the same currently exists or may hereafter be amended. (b) The COUNTY and CITY are hereby obligated to take all actions necessary to assure compliance with COUNTY's certification regarding affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Section 104 (b) of Title I of ACT, as amended. (c) The COUNTY and CITY are hereby obligated to take all actions necessary to assure compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975. (d) COUNTY and CITY will comply with the applicable provisions of the following: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968; the Fair Housing Act; Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations part 570; Cranston -Gonzales National Affordable housing Act (Public Law 101-625); Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259; Executive Order 11988; the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.§4630, et. seq.); Section 109 of Title I of the ACT and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 6; the implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 8, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act; the implementing regulations at 28 CFR part 35, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; the implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 136, and Section 3 of the Civil Rights Act of 1963, as amended; and other Federal or state statute or regulation applicable to the use of CDBG, HOME Investment Partnerships Act (enacted as Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990), and Emergency Solutions Grant funds. (e) CITY agrees that the Urban County Program funding for activities in, or in support of, the CITY are prohibited if CITY does not affirmatively further fair housing within CITY' S jurisdiction or impedes COUNTY actions to comply with its fair housing certification. (f) CITY and COUNTY shall meet the citizen participation requirements of 24 CFR 570.301 and provide Urban County Program citizens with all of the following: Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 4 of 16 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i. The estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to be used for activities that will benefit persons of low and moderate -income; ii. A plan for minimizing displacement of persons as a result of activities assisted with CDBG funds and to assist persons actually displaced as a result of such activities; iii. A plan that provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate -incomes, residents of slum and blighted areas, and of areas in which funds are proposed to be used, and provides for participation of residents in low and moderate -income neighborhoods; iv. Reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information, and records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under the ACT; V. Provide for public meetings to obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community development program, including at least the development of needs, the review of proposed activities and review of program performance. Meeting shall be held after adequate notice, at times and locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the disabled. (g). CITY shall develop a community development plan, for the period of this Agreement, which identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short and long-term community development objectives. (h). CITY certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that: i. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the CITY, to any person influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 5 of 16 59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ii. If any funds other than Federally -appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions. iii. The CITY shall require that the language provided in Sections 4(e)(i) and 4(e)(ii) of this Agreement be included in the award documents for all sub -awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub- grants and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub -recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. (iv). In accordance with Section 519 of Public Law 101-144, (the 1990 HUD Appropriations Act), the CITY certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations, and that it has adopted and is enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to, or exit from, a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH POLICY AND PROGRAM OBJECTIVES. The COUNTY's Board of Supervisors have adopted policies and procedures to ensure efficient and effective administration of the CDBG, HOME and ESG programs. COUNTY will provide these policies and procedures to CITY within a reasonable time after this Agreement's commencement date. COUNTY and City agree to comply with these said policies and program objectives and to take no actions to obstruct implementation of the approved 2024-2029 Five Year Consolidated Plan and the subsequent Five Year Consolidated Plan. 6. OTHER AGREEMENTS Pursuant to Federal regulations at 24 CFR 570.501(b), CITY is subject to the same Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 6 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 requirements applicable to sub -recipients, including the requirement of a written agreement set forth in Federal regulations at 24 CFR 570.503. For each fiscal year during the term of this Agreement, COUNTY and CITY shall enter into an additional agreement, commonly known as a Supplemental Agreement, that will have a term coinciding with a CDBG Program Year and enumerate the project(s) CITY will implement with its entitlement funds. Said Supplemental Agreement will set forth the time schedule for completion of said project(s) and any funding sources, in addition to entitlement funds, that will be used in completing the project(s). If substantial compliance with the completion schedule, due to unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances, cannot be met by CITY, the schedule for the project(s) may be extended by COUNTY. If COUNY determines that substantial progress toward drawdown of funds is not made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, the entitlement funds associated with the project(s) may be reprogrammed by COUNTY, to other activities as determined by COUNTY, after COUNTY provides appropriate written notice to CITY. COUNTY's decision not to extend the completion schedule associated with the project(s), or to reprogram the entitlement funds associated with the project(s), will not excuse CITY from complying with terms of this Agreement. 7. DETERMINATION OF PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED AND DISTRIBUTION OF ENTITLEMENT FUNDS. CITY agrees to submit to COUNTY in writing, no later than the date specified by COUNTY prior to each program year, the activities that the CITY desires to implement with its entitlement funds, said designation to comply with statutory and regulatory provisions governing citizen's participation. Said designation is to be reviewed by the COUNTY's Housing and Workforce Solutions to determine that the projects are eligible under Federal regulations for funding and inclusion in the One Year Action Plan of the County's Five -Year Consolidated Plan and consistent with both Federal and COUNTY policy governing use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. In the event that CITY fails to submit to COUNTY the identified activities that the CITY desires to implement with its entitlement funds by the date specified prior to each program year, the COUNTY may determine the activities to be funded, without consent of the CITY, Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 7 of 16 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 consistent with both Federal and COUNTY policy governing use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Consistent with Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of this Agreement, COUNTY's Board of Supervisors will make the final determination of the distribution and disposition of all CDBG funds received by COUNTY pursuant to the Act. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MANUAL. CITY warrants that those officers, employees, and agents, retained by it and responsible for implementing projects funded with CDBG have received, reviewed, and will follow the Community Development Block Grant Manual that has been prepared and amended by COUNTY, which Manual is incorporated herein and made a part hereof by this reference. 9. REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED OR PUBLIC FACILITY CONSTRUCTED WITH CDBG FUNDS. When CDBG funds are used, in whole or in part, by CITY to acquire real property or to construct a public facility, CITY shall comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq.), the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21000, et seq.), the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. § 4630, et seq.), and California Government Code Sections 7260 et seq., as those laws may be amended from time -to -time and any Federal or state regulations issued to implement the aforementioned laws. In addition, the following is to occur: (a) Title to the real property shall vest in CITY; (b) The real property title will be held by or the constructed facility will be maintained by the CITY for the approved use until five years after the date that the project is reported as "Completed" within the annual Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (c) While held by CITY, the real property or the constructed facility is to be used exclusively for the purpose for which acquisition or construction was originally approved by COUNTY; Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 8 of 16 62 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (d) CITY shall provide timely written notice to COUNTY of any action which would result in a modification or change in the use of the real property purchased or improved, in whole or in part, with CDBG or HOME funds from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement, including disposition. (e) CITY shall provide timely written notice to citizens and opportunity to comment on any proposed modification or change; (f) Written approval from COUNTY must be secured if the property or the facility is to be put to an alternate use that is or is not consistent with Federal regulations governing CDBG funds; (g) Should CITY desire during the five (5) year period to use the real property or the constructed facility for a purpose not consistent with applicable Federal regulations governing CDBG funds or to sell the real property or facility, then: (i) If CITY desires to retain title, it will have to reimburse either COUNTY or the Federal government an amount that represents the percentage of current fair market value that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds initially comprised to when the property was acquired or the facility was constructed; (ii) If CITY sells the property or facility, or is required to sell the property or facility, CITY is to reimburse the COUNTY an amount that represents the percentage of proceeds realized by the sale that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds comprised of the monies paid to initially acquire the property or construct the facility. This percentage amount will be calculated after deducting all actual and reasonable cost of sale from the sale proceeds. 10. DISPOSITION OF INCOME GENERATED BY THE EXPENDITURE OF CDBG FUNDS. CITY shall inform COUNTY in writing of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds received by CITY from COUNTY. CITY may not retain program income so generated. Any and all program income shall be returned to the County and may only be used for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements, including all requirements for citizen participation. Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 9 of 16 63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The COUNTY is required by HUD to monitor and report the receipt and use of all program income. CITY is required to track, monitor, and report any and all program income as requested by COUNTY. 11. TERMINATION. Except as provided for in Section 2, CITY and COUNTY cannot terminate or withdraw from this Agreement while it remains in effect. 12. NOTICES. All correspondence and notices required or contemplated by this Agreement shall be delivered to the respective parties at the addresses set forth below and are deemed submitted two days after their deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Heidi Marshall, Director County of Riverside HWS CITY OF Jon McMillen, City Manager City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1528 78-495 Calle Tampico Riverside, CA 92502 La Quinta, CA 92253 13. AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATION. The City Manager in the case of the City of La Quinta, and the Director of Housing and Workforce Solutions, in the case of the County of Riverside, or their designee, shall administer the terms and conditions of this Agreement for their respective city or county. 14. COOPERATION; FURTHER ACT. The PARTIES shall cooperate fully with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purpose of the Agreement. 15. NO THIRD -PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 10 of 16 64 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the PARTIES hereto and shall not create any rights in any third parties. No other person or entity shall have any right or action based upon the provisions of the Agreement. 16. SECTION HEADINGS. The Section headings herein are for the convenience of the PARTIES only and shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions or language of this Agreement. 17. FORMER AGREEMENTS UTILIZING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY. All agreements between CITY and COUNTY regarding the use of CDBG funds for fiscal years 1975-76 through fiscal years 2023-2024, and any Supplemental Agreements there under, shall remain in full force and effect. If the language of this Agreement is in conflict or inconsistent with the terms of any prior said agreements between CITY and COUNTY, the language of this Agreement will be controlling. 18. INDEMNIFICATION CITY agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless COUNTY and its authorized officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability arising from CITY acts, errors or omissions and for any costs or expenses incurred by COUNTY on account of any claim therefore, except where such indemnifications is prohibited by law. CITY shall promptly notify COUNTY in writing of the occurrence of any such claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability. CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY against any liability, claims, losses, demands, and actions incurred by COUNTY as a result of the determination by HUD or its successor that activities undertaken by CITY under the program(s) fail to comply with any laws, regulations, or policies applicable thereto or that any funds billed by and disbursed to CITY under this Agreement were improperly expended. 19. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 11 of 16 65 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By executing this Agreement, the Parties hereby certify that they will adhere to and comply with all Federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this Agreement embodies the entire agreement of the Parties in relation to the subject matter hereof, and that no other agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject matter, exists between the Parties at the time of I execution. 21. SEVERABILITY. Each paragraph and provision of this Agreement is severable from each other provision and in the event any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provision will never the less continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. 22. ASSIGNMENT. CITY shall not make any sale, assignment, conveyance or lease of any trust or power, or transfer in any other form with respect to this Agreement, or delegate or assign any interest in this Agreement without prior written approval of the County. 23. INTERPRETATION AND GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the Parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all Parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof. 24. WAIVER. Failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, or the failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other Party, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other Party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 12 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by a Party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, State of California, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court or jurisdiction. 26. AMENDMENTS No change, amendment, or modification to the Agreement shall be valid or binding upon CITY or COUNTY unless such change, amendment, or modification is in writing and duly executed. CITY and COUNTY agree to adopt any necessary amendments to this Agreement to incorporate changes required by HUD as set forth in the Urban County Qualification Notice. Amendments must be submitted to HUD as provided in the Urban County Qualification Notice and failure to do so will void the automatic renewal for such qualification period. 27. PROHIBITION OF CDBG FUND TRANSFER The CITY may not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of the CDBG funds to another such cooperating city, metropolitan city, urban county, or Indian tribe, that directly receives CDBG funds in exchange for any other funds, credits, or non -Federal considerations. CITY must use the CDBG funds for activities eligible under Title I of the ACT. 28. EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT FORMULA ALLOCATION CITY acknowledges that while participating in the COUNTY's Urban County program, CITY can only receive a formula Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) allocation from the Urban County program and only at such times as authorized by the Board of Supervisors. The CITY and COUNTY may also apply for ESG funds from the State of California, if permitted by the State. 29. HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT FORMULA ALLOCATION CITY acknowledges that while participating in the COUNTY's Urban County program, CITY can only receive a formula HOME allocation from the Urban County program Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 13 of 16 67 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and only at such times as authorized by the Board of Supervisors. The CITY and COUNTY may also apply for HOME funds from the State of California, if permitted by the State. 30. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The persons executing this Agreement or exhibits attached hereto on behalf of the Parties to this Agreement hereby warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Agreement and warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind the respective Parties to this Agreement to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 31. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS The Parties hereby affirm the facts set forth in the recitals above. Said recitals are incorporated herein and made an operative part of this Agreement. 32. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 14 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and CITY have executed this Agreement on the date shown below. Date: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California BY: Heidi Marshall, Director Housing and Workforce Solutions APPROVED AS TO FORM: Minh C. Tran, County Counsel By: Paula S. Salcido, Deputy County Counsel CITY OF LA QUINTA, a charter city BY: Mayor ATTEST: BY: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: City Attorney Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 15 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFICATION The Office of County Counsel of the County of Riverside hereby certifies that the terms and provisions of this Agreement are fully authorized under state and local law and that the Agreement provides full legal authority for the COUNTY to undertake, or assist in undertaking, essential community development and housing assistance activities specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing. Minh C. Tran County Counsel By: Deputy, Paula S. Salcido Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2024-2026 Page 16 of 16 70 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETIN( August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR UP TO SIX EMPLOYEES FROM THE FINANCE AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENTS TO ATTEND THE CALPERS EDUCATIONAL FORUM IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, OCTOBER 1-4, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Authorize overnight travel for up to six employees from the Finance and Human Resources departments to attend the CalPERS Educational Forum in Los Angeles, California, October 1-4, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • CalPERS provides retirement, disability and health benefits for the City and sponsors training programs taught by CalPERS experts. • Finance and Human Resources work in collaboration to assist employees with benefits program administration, payroll, and reporting requirements. • The Finance and Human Resources divisions seek additional knowledge in the administration of CaIPERS benefits and reporting requirements. FISCAL IMPACT Estimated expenses are $1,500 per attendee which includes registration, travel, lodging, and meals. Funds are included in the travel and training budget, Finance (Account No. 101-1006-60320) and the travel and training budget, Human Resources (Account No. 101-1004-60320). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City provides retirement, disability and health benefits through CalPERS. The annual forum is dedicated to assisting members with the administration of CaIPERS- related responsibilities. In addition, CalPERS Board Members, Directors, and Chief Actuaries attend and participate as keynote speakers, as session instructors, and in one-on-one discussions. 71 The CalPERS Educational Forum provides training in reporting and documentation of employee membership, payroll, and service credits; actuarial reporting for unfunded pension obligations; basic and complex scenarios involving separation from service, moving between reciprocal retirement systems, and enrollment of members; working after retirement; reducing agency liabilities; and common audit issues for public agencies. The City processes payroll for all employees, commissioners, and Council members internally. Human Resources is responsible for administering the City's benefit plans and ensuring compliance with state and federal laws that apply to benefits and leaves along with assisting Finance with the payroll process. Finance is responsible for verifying and processing payroll. Responsibilities include ensuring accurate reporting of retirement and health benefits to CalPERS, annual California Transparency reporting to the State, processing all quarterly and annual payroll reports to the State and Internal Revenue Service, and ensuring all taxes are paid to the appropriate entities with each payroll period. In order to keep up with ever -evolving regulatory requirements, attending this educational forum mitigates risk and ensures that the City is keeping up with current workplace challenges and compliance requirements. City staff has not attended this conference since 2019 along with new employees who will be attending this conference for the first time. Since the pandemic, various regulatory requirements have been updated and this year's conference schedule includes a large number of sessions dedicated to key items in all aspects of finance, payroll, human resources, benefits administration and membership, and leadership and management. Because many of the sessions will overlap, having various staff attend will provide us with the opportunity to focus on these essential sessions, while learning in this interactive environment. ALTERNATIVES The Council may elect to reduce the number of attendees or not have anyone attend. Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 72 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEE I INC3: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS REVISIONS TO THE PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY, DISTINGUISHED ARTISTS, AND DISTINGUISHED ATHLETES AWARD PROGRAMS RECOMMENDATION Discuss revisions to the Pillars of the Community, Distinguished Artists, and Distinguished Athletes award programs. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • La Quinta recognizes residents who have made contributions to the City by honoring them as Pillars of the Community. Residents are also acknowledged as Distinguished Artists if they have used their artistic talents to contribute to La Quinta's image and Distinguished Athletes if they have served the City in the field of sports. • Despite efforts to promote the awards, recently there has been a decline in nominations submitted by community members. • A Subcommittee was formed to evaluate the awards process and assess potential modifications to the City's recognition programs. • The Subcommittee met in April 2023, identified opportunities to enhance the awards programs, and are bringing their recommendations to Council for discussion. FISCAL 11VIV ►CT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Since 1992, La Quinta has recognized residents who have made contributions to the City by honoring them as Pillars of the Community. Residents are also acknowledged as Distinguished Artists and Distinguished Athletes if they have used their artistic talents to contribute to La Quinta's image or served the City in the field of sports. The City asks residents and/or local schools/organizations to nominate individuals deserving of these honors and has increased efforts to promote the recognition programs, however for the past few years there has been a decline in nominations submitted by community members. Due to the lack of interest in these programs, the Community Services 73 Commission (Commission) discussed revising the nomination process and enhancing promotional strategies to restore the significance of these honors. During the June 13, 2022, Commission meeting, a subcommittee was formed and tasked with assessing nomination criteria and potential modifications to the recognition programs. On February 7, 2023, Council appointed Councilmember Fitzpatrick to serve on the Subcommittee. The Subcommittee met on April 5, 2023, and discussed potential changes that may improve participation in the recognition programs. The Subcommittee's recommended changes include: • Separate the Pillars of the Community Award from the Senior Inspiration Award (SIA) (SIA recipients will not automatically become Pillars) • Create a Junior/Youth achievement award • Create a Community Services award • Eliminate Distinguished Artists and Athletes awards to create a Distinguished Citizen award • Consider non-residents who have volunteered and/or impacted the City, eligible for the various award categories • Develop a tiered system of recognition culminating in receiving the Pillars of the Community achievement • Enhance marketing/promotional efforts to promote the recognition programs • Recognize awards' recipients at the City Picnic and/or in The Gem, Create a network of community members and past awards recipients to champion and nominate individuals deserving recognition Prepared by: Michael Calderon, Management Analyst Approved by: Christina Calderon, Community Services Deputy Director 74 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS MARKETING RECAP FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 AND MARKETING STRATEGIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 RECOMMENDATION Discuss marketing recap for fiscal year 2022/23 and Marketing Strategies for fiscal year 2023/24. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The 2022/23 marketing recap focused primarily on community engagement to inform La Quinta residents of City events, information, and happenings. • The 2023/24 Marketing Strategies will continue to focus on community engagement, and will also include tourism and economic development marketing. • The City will continue its partnership with the current consultant, Madden Media, for marketing services. FISCAL IMPACT Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 marketing budget is $725,000, which includes contract services for Madden Media, comprised of account management, media buys, and additional marketing services as detailed below : • Community Engagement — 50% • Tourism — 35% • Economic Development — 15% BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS FY 2022/23 strategies focused on stronger community engagement and economic development to inform and educate residents and businesses on various projects, events, updates, and provide consistent messaging in the City. The City partnered with Madden Media on an expansive marketing strategy that focused on business development and engaging with and educating residents. 75 FY 2023/24 will continue to focus primarily on community engagement and economic development, and include tourism marketing to reach visitors coming to the area. ALTERNATIVES — None. Prepared by: Marcie Graham, Marketing Manager Approved by: Gilbert Villalpando, Director (Business Unit/Housing Development) 76 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA —'—' —: DISCUSS IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT CONTRACT EXPIRATION AND THE OPTIONS IN MOVING FORWARD THAT ADDRESS AGING EQUIPMENT AND STRESSED POWER GRID; PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY'S RESPONSE TO THE MARCH 2023 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION STUDY; AND APPOINT TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO FINALIZE THE COMMENT LETTER RECOMMENDATION • Discuss the March 2023 Riverside County and Imperial County Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCOs) study exploring "Alternative Government Structures and Alternative Electricity Service Provisions" (Study), and possible comments that should be included in a written response due on August 30, 2023. • Appoint two Council members to finalize the written response (Attachment 1). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The LAFCOs hired Dopudja & Wells Consulting (Consultant) to review the current conditions of energy service provisions by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) and requested that stakeholders state what they see as an ideal governance for providing reliable energy service beyond December 31, 2032. • In the Draft Study (Attachment 2), released in March 2023, the Consultant outlined the following two options, with multiple variations, for stakeholders' consideration with input due in writing by August 30, 2023: 1. IID continues to provide electrical service to the Eastern Coachella Valley (CV) with representation on the current IID Board of Directors (Board), with expansion of the IID jurisdictional boundaries; or create a sub -board of directors representative of CV ratepayers and with decision -making powers. 2. IID transitions electrical service to the CV, and the stakeholders invite another entity to assume responsibility as the power provider for the Eastern CV. FISCAL IMPACT — None 77 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In February 1934, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and IID entered into a 99- year lease agreement making IID the electrical service provider for the Eastern CV. That agreement expires on December 31, 2032. The stakeholders in the lease agreement are the Cities of La Quinta, Indio, and Coachella, portions of the Cities of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, and Indian Wells, and areas of unincorporated Riverside County. While IID has been providing electrical service to much of the Eastern CV the past 89 years, IID's Board is comprised of five officials elected by registered voters within IID's jurisdiction boundary, which is limited to Imperial County. Riverside County's (County) voters are ineligible to serve on IID's Board or vote in IID's elections, though the CV represents more than 60% of IID's energy ratepaying customers. Increasing population, system reliability, aging infrastructure, capacity limitations, new development, frequent service outages, and questions regarding timely implementation of capital improvements are among concerns that have driven the need for CV stakeholders to have representation on IID's Board and provide oversight on electrical service matters. In July 2021, IID formed the Coachella Valley Energy Commission (CVEC) as a result of legislation introduced by then-Assemblymember Chad Mayes, which was later vetoed. Comprised of elected and at -large representatives of CV energy stakeholders, the Commission's primary purpose is to determine the energy needs of the greater CV portion served by IID and develop a long-term strategic plan for continued energy service beyond 2032. On May 1, 2022, Riverside and Imperial LAFCOs and the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) entered into a $500,000 grant agreement to conduct a Study to evaluate alternative governance structures and alternative electricity services currently provided by IID. As outlined in Section 3 of the agreement regarding "Study Report," an Initial Draft Study Report must include: "A conclusion and recommendations section that synthesizes the analysis into an overall recommendation for the most cost effective and efficient implementation scenario for each required option." In March 2023, the Consultant published a 159-page draft Study for public comment, which outlines multiple options with variations available to stakeholders in moving forward with a new contract. The study does not include cost analyses or an overall recommendation for the "most cost effective" scenario. IID staff reported that the financials were not completed in time 78 to be incorporated into the draft Study. At the July 27, 2023, meeting, CVEC discussed the need for the financials to be incorporated, giving stakeholders critical information needed to make informed decisions for the future of energy services. In choosing a path for the future, stakeholders must also consider that I I D equipment was not designed and planned to handle the growth that has occurred in the CV. Intensified electrification by the current customer base is pushing transmission and substation capacity to the limits. Overall system capacity is also impacting new development that can't be served by the current substations and grid. IID's policy has been to not pay for growth, but for growth and development to pay for itself. IID has identified that $1.5 billion is currently needed to maintain and improve generation and transmission capability in IID's service territory. That estimate does not include costs for additional substations needed for growth. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives recommended. Prepared by: Sherry Barkas, Marketing and Communications Specialist Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Letter to Riverside and Imperial LAFCOs 2. March 2023 Draft Study by Dopudja & Wells 79 ATTACHMENT 1 _ CALIFORNIA August 2, 2023 Gary Thompson, Executive Officer Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) 6216 Brockton Avenue Suite 111 B Riverside, CA 92506 gthompsonCa),lafco.org or info lafco.org Re: Alternative Governance and Electricity Services Study - Imperial Irrigation District Dear Mr. Thompson, As a stakeholder in the Eastern Coachella Valley area, our residents receive electrical service from Imperial Irrigation District (IID) under a 99-year lease agreement with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), the La Quinta City Council is responding to the March 2023 Draft Alternative Governance and Electricity Services Study — Imperial Irrigation District (Study), done by Dopudja & Wells Consulting. There are questions that this Study does not answer, starting with cost, as no cost analysis was done even though it was a requirement of the May 1, 2022, agreement between Riverside and Imperial LAFCOs and the California Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) that provided a $500,000 grant to cover the cost of the study. As outlined in Section 3 of that agreement regarding "Study Report," an Initial Draft Study Report must include: "A conclusion and recommendations section that synthesizes the analysis into an overall recommendation for the most cost effective and efficient implementation scenario for each required option." To make an informed decision about the future of electrical service for our residents, we need as much information as possible, including transitional cost and time frame, how that is paid for and an estimate of new rates going forward. The Coachella Valley Energy Commission was informed by IID staff during its July 27, 2023, meeting that the financial reports became available too late to include in the Draft Study. We would ask that the stakeholders and public be provided those financial reports and that the public comment period be extended for 30-days, to September 30, 2023, because the financial data will no doubt contain critical information needed to decide the best option for our residents in moving forward. _ CALIFORNIA We support a government structure that is representative of and inclusive of the Eastern Coachella Valley stakeholders and separate from the current IID board representing Imperial County stakeholders. We prefer a Coachella Valley board that represents the area divided into districts, with board members elected by registered voters of each district. We would like to see a governance structure that plans for and prioritizes ongoing maintenance of equipment and upgrading of outdated equipment, and the addition of substations as needed to better serve existing ratepayers and new development. Increasing population, system reliability, aging infrastructure, capacity limitations, new development, frequent service outages, stable costs for ratepayers, and questions regarding timely implementation of capital improvements are among our top concerns and have driven the Coachella Valley stakeholders to request representation and provide oversight on electrical service matters. Thank you. Sincerely, Linda Evans, Mayor City of La Quinta Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Councilmember City of La Quinta Deborah McGarry, Councilmember City of La Quinta Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tern City of La Quinta John Pena, Councilmember City of La Quinta t Alternative Governance and EIectricity Services Study = : --�- : Imperial 11rigtitian District -�'� - ti� 2 093, A/farch r46 PREPARED FOR: RIVERSIDE AND IMPERIAL COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSIONS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dopudja & Wells gratefully acknowledges the time and effort of officials, staff, local agencies, and all others who contributed to the completion of this report. Imperial Irrigation District Enrique Martinez, General Manager Jamie Asbury, Energy Department Manager J.B. Hamby, Board of Directors Division 2 James C. Hanks, Former Board of Directors Division 3 Joanna Hoff, Deputy General Counsel Geoff Holbrook, General Counsel Coachella Valley Water District Jim Barrett, General Manager Scott Burritt, Director of Service and Communications John Powell, Board President Division 3 Coachella Valley Cities Philip F. Bettencourt, Commissioner At - Large, Cities Steven Hernandez, Mayor, City of Coachella William Pattison, Former City Manager, City of Coachella Dr. Gabriel Martin, City Manager, City of Coachella Linda Evans, Mayor, City of La Quinta Jon McMillen, City Manager, City of La Quinta John Pena, City of La Quinta Chris Escobedo, City of Palm Desert Gina Nestande, Councilmember, City of Palm Desert Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians Waymond Fermon, Mayor, City of Indio Anthony Madrigal, Tribal Grants Bryan Montgomery, City Manager, City of Administrator Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians Karen Kupcha, Tribal Administrator Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians Joseph Mirelez, Vice Chairman Indio Alianza Coachella Valley Nida Ruiz, Environmental Justice Project Coordinator Silvia Paz, Executive Director Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability Eastern Coachella Valley Mariela Loera, Policy Advocate 83 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. REFERENCES....................................................................................... vii 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................... 1 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................... 1 2.2 Study Objective................................................................................ 1 2.3 Study Approach and Methodology................................................... 2 2.4 Summary of Findings........................................................................ 3 3. ROLE OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION ..................... 4 4. OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY .......... 5 4,1 History of IID's Extended Service Territory ........................................... 8 4,2 Average Electricity Rate Comparison by Utility Type .......................... 8 4,3 Agreement of Compromise and Hydroelectric Generation ............... 9 4.3.1 Parties to the Agreement....................................................... 10 4.3.2 Summary of Conditions.......................................................... 10 4.4 Imperial Irrigation District Energy Division .......................................... 10 4.4.1 Governance Structure............................................................ 12 4.4.2 Jurisdictional Boundary and Extended Service Territory ............ 12 5. ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS........................................................ 14 5.1 Coachella Valley Water District........................................................ 14 5.1 .l Governance.......................................................................... 14 5.1 .2 Jurisdictional Boundary.......................................................... 15 5.2 City of La Quinta.............................................................................. 16 5.3 City of Indio..................................................................................... 16 5.4 City of Coachella............................................................................ 16 5.5 Cove Communities Services Commission ......................................... 17 5.6 County of Riverside.......................................................................... 18 5.6.1 State Assembly Representation ............................................... 18 5.6.2 District Supervisor................................................................... 18 5.7 County of Imperial........................................................................... 18 5.7.1 State Assembly Representation ............................................... 19 5.7.2 District Supervisors.................................................................. 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.8 Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians ....................................... 22 5.9 Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians ................................................... 22 5.10 Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians ............................................. 22 5.11 Cobozon Band of Cahuilla Indians .................................................... 23 5.12 Coachella Valley Association of Governments ................................... 23 6. UNCERTAIN ENERGY OUTLOOK FOR COACHELLA VALLEY ....................... 25 6.1 Desire for Local Representation and Local Control ........................... 25 7. UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE ......................... 26 7,1 Investor -Owned Utility....................................................................... 27 7.1 .1 Statutory Authority of an Investor -Owned Utility ........................ 27 7.1 .2 Funding for an Investor -Owned Utility ...................................... 28 7.1 .3 Role of the California Public Utilities Commission .................... 28 7.1 .4 Factors that Support the Formation of on Investor -Owned Utility..................................................................................... 28 7.1 .5 Factors that could Challenge the Formation of an Investor - Owned Utility......................................................................... 26 7.2 Municipal Utilities, Public Utility Districts, and Cooperatives ............... 31 7.3 Public Utility Districts......................................................................... 32 7.3.1 Statutory Authority of a Public Utility District .............................. 32 7.3.2 Funding for a Public Utility District ............................................ 33 7.3.3 Oversight and Regulation of a Public Utility District .................. 34 7.3.4 Factors that Support the Formation of a Public Utility District .... 34 7.3.5 Factors that could Challenge the Formation of a Public Utility District.................................................................................... 34 7.4 Electrical Cooperatives.................................................................... 34 7.4.1 Oversight and Regulation of Cooperative ............................... 35 7.4.2 Factors that would Support the Formation of a Cooperative ... 35 7.4.3 Factors that could Challenge the Formation of a Cooperative 36 7.5 Community Choice Aggregators...................................................... 36 7.6 Joint Powers Authority....................................................................... 37 7.6.1 Joint Powers Agreement......................................................... 37 7.6.2 Joint Powers Agency and Authorities ....................................... 37 7.6.3 Statutory Authority of a Joint Powers Authority .......................... 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.6.4 Funding of a Joint Powers Authority ......................................... 38 7.6.5 Public Financing Authority....................................................... 38 7.6.6 Oversight and Regulation of a Joint Powers Authority ............... 38 7.6.7 Factors that would Support the Formation of a Joint Powers Authority................................................................................. 39 7.6.8 Factors that could Challenge the Formation of a Joint Powers 7.6. Authority................................................................................. 39 9 Comparison Between a Joint Powers Authority and Public Utility District........................................................................... 39 8. STUDY APPROACH AND ANALYSIS........................................................ 40 8.1 Stakeholder Outreach and Feedback Received ............................... 40 8.1 . l Electrical Service Questionnaire and Responses ...................... 40 8.1 .2 Individual Stakeholder Discussions ........................................... 41 8.2 Analysis of Alternative Options........................................................... 43 8.2.1 Establishing Stakeholder -Driven Foundational Objectives .......... 43 9. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS ......................................... 45 9.1 Required Capital Investment Common to all Options ........................ 45 9.2 OPTION 1: IID Continues to Provide Electrical Service to the Coachella Valley Territory................................................................. 46 9.2.1 Alternative Governance Structures for Service Alternative Option No. 1...................................................................................... 46 9.3 OPTION 2: IID Terminates Electrical Service to the Coachella Valley Territory............................................................................................ 49 9.3.1 Alternative Governance Structures for Service Alternative Option No. 2...................................................................................... 49 9,4 Alternative Options Support Foundation Objectives to Varying Degrees 52 9,5 Suggested Actions Prior to the Expiration of the Agreement of Compromise..................................................................................... 57 LIST OF TABLES 4-1 2020 CENSUS POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR CITIES IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY 4-2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNITIES THAT RECEIVE ELECTRICITY SERVICE FROM IID 4-3 IID ENERGY DIVISION BUDGET SUMMARY BY MAJOR CATEGORY 9-1 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION GOVERNANCE SURVEY: TYPE OF GOVERNING BODY 9-2 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION GOVERNANCE SURVEY: AUTHORITY OF GOVERNING BODY LIST OF FIGURES 4-1 CITIES LOCATED IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY 4-2 IID JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY AND EXTENDED ELECTRIC SERVICE TERRITORY 5-1 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY 5-2 COACHELLA VALLEY CITIES AND CITY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 5-3 IMPERIAL COUNTY RENEWABLE ENERGY OVERLAY 5-4 IMPERIAL COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICTS 5-5 TRIBAL NATIONS IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY 7-1 OVERVIEW OF MAJOR TYPES OF UTILITY STRUCTURES 7-2 INVESTOR -OWNED UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODEL 7-3 INVESTOR -OWNED UTILITY GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE 7-4 LOCATION OF IOU'S IN CALIFORNIA 7-5 MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT OWNERSHIP MODEL 7-6 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE 7-7 COOPERATIVE OWNERSHIP MODEL 7-8 COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATOR'S GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE 9-1 ALTERNATIVE GOVERNANCE EVALUATION MATRIX LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: ASSEMBLY BILL 1021 APPENDIX B: 1934 AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AB ASSEMBLY BILL ACT LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT AD ASSEMBLY DISTRICTS APPA AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION BCPA BOULDER CANYON PROJECT ACT CAISO CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CCA COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATORS CCSC COVE COMMUNITIES SERVICES COMMISION CEPC CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CFC COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CFD COMMUNITY FINANCE DISTRICT CO-OP ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE CPUC CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CV COACHELLA VALLEY CVAG COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS CVEC COACHELLA VALLEY ENERGY COMMISSION CVWD COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS (CONT.) CWC CALIFORNIA WATER CODE EPA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ESP ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS IID IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT IOU INVESTOR -OWNED UTILITY JFA JOINT FINANCING AUTHORITY JPA JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY LAFCO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MW MEGAWATTS NRECA NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC CO-OP ASSOCIATION O&M OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PFA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY PUD PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT REA RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION REOZ RENEWABLE ENERGY OVERLAY ZONE RUS RURAL UTILITY SERVICES SB SENATE BILL SCAG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS STUDY ALTERNATIVE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES AND ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICITY SERVICE PROVISION STUDY SWRCB STATE WATER RESOURCE CONTROL BOARD WECC WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATION COUNCIL REFERENCES American Public Power Association. April 2021. Public Power Governance Survey California Publicly Owned Utilities. 16th Edition, 2022. Energy Efficiency in California's Public Power Sector California Community Choice Association, 2021, Model Practice Guide California State Legislature, Senate Local Government Committee. August 2007, A Citizen's Guide to Joint Powers Agreements Legislative Analyst Report. June 2001. Compare and Contrast: Municipal Power Authorities and Municipal Utility Districts American Public Power Association. 2016. Public Power for your Community, Local control, Local priorities. A stronger local economy. Regulatory Assistance Program, March 201 1 . Electricity Regulations In the US: A Guide Rocky Mountain Institute. 2018. Navigating Utility Business Model Reform California Special District Association, 2020. Special District Laws Reference Guide California Public Utilities Commission. March 2001, Standard Practice U-62-W: Formation of Water Districts in California California State Legislature, Senate Local Government Committee. October 2010, Fourth Edition. A Citizen's Guide to Special Districts in California: What's so Special about Special Districts? California Department of Finance. Various. Legislative Analysis: Finance Bill Analysis Imperial Irrigation District. November 2016. Strategic Plan Imperial Irrigation District. October 2021. Service Area Plan REFERENCES Imperial Irrigation District. August 2021. 2021 Annual Report Imperial Irrigation District. August 2021, Coachella Valley Energy Commission: August 5, 2021 Board Meeting Package: IID Coachella Valley Energy Service Background. United States Census Bureau. 2022. Quick Facts by City United States Department of the Interior: Indian Affairs. Various. Bureau of Indian Affairs Record Rolls Clean Power Alliance. January 2021. Southern California Association of Governments Energy and Environment Committee: 2021 Energy Industry Trends Find Energy. 2022. Rate Summary for Energy Providers Enerdynamics. Energy Knowledge Base. Investor -owned utility California Globe, April 2022. Creating a Joint Powers Authority in Legislation. BBK Law. January 2016. The Ins and Outs of Joint Powers Authorities in California California Municipal Utilities Association. Resources. What is a Publicly Owned Utility. California Publicly Owned Utilities. 2021 . The California Public Owned Utility Advantage. Ma Dopudja & Wells Sir-" 92 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following effort was developed in accordance with the Riverside and Imperial Local Agency Formation Commissions special studies contract for the development of an "Alternative Governance Structures and Alternative Electricity Service Provisions; Imperial Irrigation District", sponsored by the California State Water Resources Control Board, Study Grant Agreement No. D2118003. 2.1 Introduction Imperial Irrigation District (IID) was established in 1911 pursuant to the Irrigation District Law (California Water Code sections 20500 et. Seq.). Over the years, the district has expanded its services to become the primary electricity provider for Imperial County, as well as portions of Riverside and San Diego counties. The jurisdictional boundary, or legal boundary for IID encompasses all Imperial County. The District also provides electricity service to areas outside of their jurisdictional boundary to customers in the cities of Indio, Coachella, La Qunita, and portions of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Indian Wells and several communities in unincorporated areas of the Coachella Valley, located in Riverside County, Since 1943, IID has been providing electricity service to areas outside of its jurisdictional boundary. Today, IID is responsible for an annual operating budget of approximately $520 million, managing and operating over 1.2 gigawatts of energy generation facilities and power purchases, 20 megawatts of energy storage facilities, 1,800 miles of energy transmission lines, over 125 substations, and approximately 6,150 miles of distribution lines across a 6,800 square mile service territory. IID's Board of Directors is comprised of five officials who are elected by registered voters from geographic divisions within the district's jurisdiction boundary, which is limited to Imperial County. Since the IID's jurisdictional boundary does not extend into Riverside County, Riverside County registered voters are ineligible to serve on IID's Board of Directors, nor are they able to vote in IID elections. Over the years, conditions have changed, and the electrical service requirements have evolved for IID's Coachella Valley electrical service territory. Increasing population, system reliability, aging infrastructure, capacity limitations, new development, frequent service outages, and questions regarding timely implementation of capital improvements are among the top concerns and has driven the desire for Coachella Valley stakeholders to obtain representation on IID's Board and provide oversight on electrical service matters. With the expiration of the 1934 Agreement of Compromise nearing, local officials have begin to weigh options and discuss the outlook of electricity service and ability for the Coachella Valley to obtain local representation on electrical service matters. Today, the Coachella Valley service territory of IID represents over 60 percent of IID's ratepaying population. 2.2 Study Objective The scope of the Study is to evaluate potential alternative electrical service governance structures for stakeholders' consideration, specifically concerning IID's extended electrical service territory in the Coachella Valley, The Study provides an analysis of alternative options for future governance, including proportional representation of Riverside County electricity customers being served by IID and options for future electrical service provision by alternative utility structures, in the case IID desires to terminate service pursuant to the conditions of the 1934 Agreement of Compromise. Goal and Objective; The Study is to review the current conditions relative to the electricity service provisions provided by the Imperial Irrigation District and address the following requirements; • Options for providing continued publicly and/or independent system operator owned and managed electrical service in perpetuity to Imperial Irrigation District electrical service area customers both prior to and after, the expiration of the 99-year lease for power rights made between the Imperial Irrigation District and the Coachella Valley Water District in 1934. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Options for alternative governance structures that would extend voting rights to registered voters residing within the Imperial Irrigation District's electrical service area, allowing for proportional representation on a governing board that will have primary jurisdiction on all electrical service matters. Any findings will not affect the water service area boundaries or water rights management, which remain the sole responsibility of IID's current board of directors. The Study focuses on identifying a variety of utility ownership and governance structures that policy makers and stakeholders can consider when evaluating the current IID electricity service structure and provisions for the Coachella Valley service territory. To ensure maximum benefit in both service territories, the Study established foundational objectives to aid in the review and consideration of alternative options. Electrical Service Operations Will the entity have complete control over electrical services Type of Ownership Model (i.e vertically integrated) or Will the proposed entity specific utility functions? acquire and own electrical facilities and assets? Considering an alternative governance structure is typically shaped by: Public Policy Approach Regulatory Approach What level of representation Will the entity be responsible and oversight is desired and for achieving state mandates how does this align with the and initiatives? proposed electrical service model? 2.3 Study Approach and Methodology The Study is based on an extensive review of background documents, including IID's 2018 Integrated Resources Plan, Service Area Plan, and material presented at the Coachella Valley Energy Commission (CVEC). The primary source of information for the development of the Study and alternative options was obtained through discussions conducted with key stakeholders as part of the studys outreach effort. Over the course of developing the Study, extensive stakeholder outreach was conducted and included individual discussions with IID staff, CVWD, Cities within the Coachella Valley, Tribal Nations, Riverside and Imperial Counties, and a general session with over ten different local government and special interest groups. Additional information about key stakeholders who played a vital role in the development of the evaluation criteria can be found in Section 5. As indicated, stakeholder discussions established foundational objectives that provide insight to how well each alternative option performs against the status quo and stakeholder interests. This approach defined criteria based on stakeholder input and provides for a locally calibrated set of criteria that can be used to evaluate and compare alternative options. More information on foundational objectives can be found in Section 8. Several attempts over the years, including AB 854 introduced in 2019, have been unsuccessful in providing representation for Coachella Valley customers. In attempt to address this, the Study will; • Identify practical alternatives to enable stakeholders to further develop and advance implementation. • Determine foundational differences between service and governance structure options. • Highlight the interaction between the level of utility responsibility and the corresponding degree of representation, i.e. the degree of representation would be equivalent to the amount of control and market risk of the proposed utility. • Assess each alternative option against criteria that has been established by local stakeholders. After stakeholders determine the appropriate service and governance approach, the next task is to determine roles, responsibilities, and rights for the alternative option under consideration. The scope of this Study is limited to only identifying alternative service and governance structures for the Coachella Valley service territory. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.4 Summary of Findings Section 9 presents the findings of this Study. The conclusion as to whether IID should continue to serve as the electrical service provider for the Coachella Valley territory depends on the analysis of how well the proposed alternative options match the appropriate scale and ambitions within the service territory, stakeholder needs, and potential to improve the status quo. To determine which alternative option best suits the needs of the Coachella Valley, stakeholders must first identify the desired roles, responsibilities, and rights for the potential service and governance option. The alternative option that aligns most effectively with the desired electrical service responsibilities could likely be selected and pursued. Since existing regulations and underlying objectives within the service territory may vary, stakeholders could likely have differing perspectives on which option is more suitable for implementation, Based on the findings, there are several alternative service and governance options that support many of the foundational objectives. To further this finding, each stakeholder will need to determine which of the established foundational objectives are most important when deciding which alternative option to consider. For example, among the alternative options that support many of the foundational objectives, the following foundational objectives are supported to varying degrees. • Structure Easy to Implement: Proposed structure should require a limited amount of coordination to implement the proposed service and/or governance structure, including legal, financial, and legislative complexity as compared to status quo, • Ability to Achieve Vertically Integrated Utility Status: Structure that could allow for the complete oversight and governance of all electrical service provisions associated with generation, transmission, and distribution. A utility ownership structure that could be expanded to provide the greatest regulatory control and monopoly over all aspects of electricity services provisions. • Ability to Adapt to Future Changes and Responsibilities: Structure that can be modified to align with future changes in the members roles and responsibilities of utility ownership and/or governance, If the desire among the Coachella Valley stakeholders is to pursue an alternative option which can be flexible and adapt going forward, then the alternative service and governance options which support the above foundational objectives should be further developed and pursued. Please refer to Figure 9-1 for the alternative options evaluation matrix which evaluates the proposed alternative options against each of the foundational objectives. Q�y 1 Ma Dopudja & Wells Sir-" ROLE OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION The Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (Riverside LAFCO) and the Imperial County Local Agency Formation Commission (Imperial LAFCO) are jointly referred to as the Riverside and Imperial LAFCOs throughout this document. The Riverside and Imperial LAFCOs are responsible for conducting periodic reviews of public service providers per to the Cortese - Knox -Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Act). Under the Act, each LAFCO is required to initiate and make studies of existing governmental agencies, including, but not limited to, studies to determine each local agency's maximum service area and service capacities. In September 2021, Assembly Bill 1021 (AB 1021, Mayes. Imperial Irrigation District) was introduced and ultimately vetoed. However, because state funding was included as part of 2021 Budget Act, the study referenced in AB 1021 was allowed to proceed. Thus, the study parameters included in AB 1021 established the scope and basis of evaluation for the proposed study. In response, the Riverside and Imperial LAFCO's were selected to conduct and publish a joint study regarding options for providing continued publicly owned and managed electrical service to the Imperial Irrigation District's electrical service area. Further, this joint study is to evaluate existing electrical service provisions, and to evaluate alternative governance structures that would provide for proportional representation on a governing board with primary jurisdiction over electrical service matters for IID electricity customers located in the Coachella Valley. In response to this requirement, the Riverside and Imperial LAFCOs initiated the preparation of an "Alternative Governance Structures and Alternative Electricity Service Provision" study (Study). The Riverside and Imperial LAFCOs are responsible for providing notice and distributing materials relating to this Study; interested parties can find more information at the respective LAFCO websites. Public hearings will be held during review process and prior to the release of the final Study, and the public review period will allow all stakeholders, the Riverside and Imperial LAFCOs, and the general public to review and provide comments on the Public Draft Study. The public review period will commence when the Study is submitted by LAFCO, currently anticipated for March 31, 2023, and extend to August 30, 2023. A Final Study is expected to be completed by November 30, 2023. Ma Dopudja & Wells Sir-" OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY The Coachella Valley, situated in the Colorado Desert of California, spans from the Salton Sea to Riverside County in the northwest. It extends southeast from the San Gorgonio Pass to the northern shoreline of the Salton Sea, encompassing portions of Imperial County. It is bounded by the San Bernardino and Little San Bernardino Mountains on the northeast, and by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains on the southwest. Within Coachella Valley, there are nine incorporated cities and several unincorporated communities. According to the 2020 Census, the total population for the Coachella Valley was 370,135 individuals. The population is summarized by incorporated area in Table 4-1 below, An overview of cities located in the Coachella Valley and incorporated areas is presented on Figure 4-1. TABLE 4-1 - 2020 CENSUS POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR CITIES IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY Indio 1 89,137 La Quinta 37,558 Coachella 41,941 Rancho Mirage 16,999 Indian Wells 5,463 Palm Desert 51,163 Palm Springs(1) 44,575 Desert Hot Springs(1) 32,512 Cathedral City(1) 51,493 Notes; (1) Located in Coachella Valley, but not within IID's extended electrical service territory. OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY FIGURE 4-1: CITIES LOCATED IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY Symbology CVVVU SUMCe Raundary achella Valley C Ides arnd Populatlaw iN010, 89r37 LAQLAKTA, 37558 COACHE L LA, 41941 RANCHO MIRAGE, 16999 INDIAN WELLS, 5483 _.� CATHEDRAL CITY, 51493 PALM DESERT, 511 B3 ■ ❑E6ERT HOT SPRINGS, 32512 Snuma- CVVVO. end Ilp ElapElic Serwic$ derle6 pirnJded by Rnierralds LAFCO. laimea_This isNDT an aficisI map. udjo *ind Vwella CogsuffQg doae not amen the accuracy of data in thra map. wrore or OrVI3Gl m shell not ba *$c d the wspcimbili7y oFt�cpud is OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY The Coachella Valley is also home to several unincorporated areas and towns including Cabazon, Bermuda Dunes, and Thousand Palms, which are located in the east end of the valley. The northern part of the valley includes Indio Hills, Sky Valley, North Palm Springs, and Garnet. In the southeast, there are Thermal, Vista Santa Rosa, Oasis, and Mecca. The native Cahuilla tribe is represented in the area by the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, Twentynine Palms Band of Mission Indians, Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, and the Torres -Martinez Band of Cahuilla Indians, all of whom have reservations in the region, The portion of IID's service territory in the Coachella Valley encompasses customers in several cities, as well as a number of communities located in unincorporated areas of Riverside County, also including Salton Sea, North Shores, Chiriaco Summit, and Joshua Tree National Park. A summary of communities located in Riverside County that receive electrical service from IID is provided in Table 4-2 below. TABLE 4-2 - RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNITIES THAT RECEIVE ELECTRICITY SERVICE FROM IID City of Coachella Sky Valley District Community City of Rancho Mirage Thermal District Community City of Indian Wells Thousand Palms District Community City of Palm Desert Bermuda Dunes District Community City of Desert Hot Springs Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Torres -Martinez Band of Cahuilla Indians Twentynine Palms Band of Mission Indians Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY 4.1 History of IID's Extended Service Territory IID was established in 1911 pursuant to the Irrigation District Law (California Water Code sections 20500 et seq,), Throughout the 1920's, the source of power to Imperial County was approximately 400 miles away at hydroelectric installations in Northern California. Due to the long distance from power sources and high line losses, the district faced high electric rates which made it less competitive compared to other areas in California, In response, IID investigated the potential for developing hydroelectric power. In 1928, the U.S. Congress enacted the Boulder Canyon Project Act (BCPA), which authorized the construction of a dam on the Colorado River to control the river and preserve its waters. The Act also authorized the creation of the Hoover Dam and the construction of the All - American Canal, a canal system that would deliver Colorado River water to the Imperial and Coachella Valley areas. During this time, both the IID and the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) - described in more detail in the section that follows, were separately negotiating independent contracts with the United States for the construction of the canal and repayment of costs to bring water to the region, The BCPA was primarily related to water issues, but also allowed for the Department of Interior to contract for hydroelectric power generation opportunities on the canal. The United States recognized the potential for hydroelectric power and that it could be used as a way to repay canal construction costs, Realizing the potential, the United States granted all hydroelectric generation opportunities on the canals to IID and CVWD, in exchange for a repayment agreement that would provide "net proceeds" received from power operations to the United States for the repayment of construction costs. In 1936 the IID entered the electric power business for Imperial County during the construction of the All - American Canal. IID anticipated that hydroelectric power generated from the All -American Canal would enable them to set power rates considerably lower than their competitors. During this time, Congress authorized construction of the All -American Canal to Coachella Valley, Negotiations with the United States for repayment contracts also required the determination of water and power rights for IID and CVWD. The terms of the 1934 Agreement of Compromise between IID and CVWD granted IID first rights to water delivered through the All - American Canal and a 99-year lease on all power rights CVWD had on the canal. To compensate CVWD for the power rights lease, IID agreed to pay a percentage of its power operation's "net proceeds" to CVWD, In return, the CVWD authorized IID to provide electricity service to the Coachella Valley, Section 4.3 provides a detailed overview of the 1934 Agreement of Compromise. 4.2 Average Electricity Rate Comparison by Utility Type For reference and to establish a baseline electric rate for comparison, the following section compares average IID residential electricity rates to neighboring utilities. Rates are provided for IID, an Investor -owned Utility, and a Municipally Owned Utility. As shown, IID electricity rates for residential service are competitive and additional information on can be found on IID's website (www. iid, com/energy/rates-regulations/rates), Based on a February 2023 billing, the average electric residential service cost is approximately $0.1715 per Kilowatt -Hour and includes the following components; • Customer Charge (Schedule D) = $9.60 per month fixed charge • Energy Cost Adjustment -Non Renewable (Schedule ECA) = $0,0383 per Kilowatt -Hour o Based on the previous 12 months of actual costs • Energy Cost Adjustment -Renewable (Schedule ECA- R) = $0,0019 per Kilowatt -Hour o Based on the previous 12 months of actual costs • Public Benefit Charge (Schedule PBC) = 2.85% surcharge based on total monthly charge • California Energy Surcharge = $0.00030 per Kilowatt - Hour OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY The following provides a residential rate comparison based on 2020 average rates and charges for various energy providers and utility structures. • Imperial Irrigation District: $0.1616 per Kilowatt -Hour • Investor -Owned Utility (Southern California Edison): $0.2513 per Kilowatt -Hour • Municipal Owned Utility (Riverside Public Utilities): $0.1695 per Kilowatt -Hour 4.3 Agreement of Compromise and Hydroelectric Generation To facilitate the construction of the All -American Canal and the repayment of associated construction costs, both IID and CVWD negotiated independent contracts with the United States. In 1932, the IID and the United States executed a contract for the construction of the canal. The agreement granted IID exclusive rights to all power generation opportunities created on the canal system, not reserved by the United States. The agreement also required the CVWD service territory to annex into IID, or the United States would forgo the development and construction of the canal system to the Coachella Valley area. However, CVWD contested the requirement by the United States and initiated a series of negotiations to finalize the contract. Eventually, the United States mandated that the parties resolve their differences to avoid impeding the construction and repayment of the proposed canal system. On February 14, 1934, the IID and CVWD resolved their differences and signed an Agreement of Compromise, allowing the project to move forward and execute separate contracts with the United States. On October 15, 1934, CVWD executed a contract with the United States for the construction of the Coachella branch with similar conditions included in IID's contract for the All - American Canal. In 1936, IID entered the power business in Imperial County and later expanded their service territory by purchasing electrical facility assets in the Coachella Valley from the California Electric Power Company (CEPC) in 1943, The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved an adjustment to the service boundary between IID and CEPC as part of the acquisition. According to California Water Code sections 22115 through 22124, irrigation districts may provide and sell electric power outside their boundaries. To facilitate the acquisition of CEPC facilities in Coachella Valley, CVWD agreed to deliver 80 percent of all electricity customers in Coachella Valley to IID. Today, this area is known as IID's "District Coachella Service Territory". The areas serviced under service agreements include the cities of Indio, Coachella, La Quinta, and portions of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Indian Wells, and several communities in unincorporated areas in the Coachella Valley, located in Riverside County. Today, approximately 60 percent of IID's electricity customers reside outside of IID's jurisdictional boundary and are located in the Coachella Valley service territory. Furthermore, growth in this area of Riverside County continues to outpace Imperial County. A map of IID's electrical service territory is shown on Figure 4-2. F � s All -American Canal construction, 1937 �;' rf1-.'-kN 103 OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY 4.3.1 Parties to the Agreement Signed in 1934, the Agreement of Compromise was executed to ratify the allocation of water priorities between the IID and CVWD. The agreement stipulated that CVWD would lease its power generation opportunities to IID for a period of 99 years, ending on December 31, 2033, in exchange for certain conditions as specified in the agreement, 4.3.2 Summary of Conditions The 1934 Agreement of Compromise provided that the CVWD would lease their power rights over the term of the agreement to IID, providing IID the exclusive right to operate, manage, develop, and control the use, sale, and generation of electricity as related to the All - American Canal. Below is a summary of conditions included as part of the agreement. • Stipulated the term of the agreement to be 99 years, through December 31, 2033. • Allowed IID to lease CVWD's power right opportunities along the canal over the term of the agreement. • Authorized CVWD to execute an independent contract with the United States for the All -American Canal without being annexed by IID. • Gave IID priority Colorado River rights over CVWD, • Authorized IID to sell electricity in CVWD's territory. • Restricted CVWD's ability to compete in power sales with IID. • Called for IID to serve power in the Coachella Valley for 99 years and to administer electric rates no greater than those charged by IID to Imperial County customers. • Required CVWD to provide signed contracts representing 80 percent of CVWD's water customers to IID, • Granted IID control of all power opportunities along the All -American Canal, • Required IID to pay eight percent of "net proceeds" annually from its power system to CVWD to settle water right disputes and combine and coordinate power rights for benefit of both service territories. 4.4 Imperial Irrigation District Energy Division The IID headquarters is in the City of Imperial, approximately 120 miles east of San Diego and directly to the north of the United States and Mexico International border in Imperial County. IID is a public entity formed pursuant to the Irrigation District Law (California Water Code sections 20500 et. Seq.) and is responsible for providing irrigation water and energy services to customers within its district boundaries and, through service contracts, to customers outside of its district boundaries. After discovering the potential from hydroelectric generation along the All -American Canal, IID entered the power industry in 1936. Today, IID serves electricity to more than 150,000 customers in Imperial County, as well as parts of Riverside and San Diego counties. Initially, IID's power customers were served electricity from a diesel generation plant in Brawley. Shortly after, with the purchase of the CEPC in 1943, IID expanded its electrical service area to include the Coachella Valley. Today, IID manages an annual electric operating budget of approximately $520 million and operates over 1.2 gigawatts of energy generation facilities and power purchases, 20 megawatts (MW) of energy storage facilities, 1,800 miles of energy transmission lines, over 125 Substations, and approximately 6,150 miles of distribution lines across a 6,800 square mile service territory. J 11D :! � lr�q&�n�r�•rNk]: TINGHE4pQUkTERt • 333 e.BhRIOYI BLVD OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY A summary of IID's operating budget for their energy division is provide in Table 4-3, IID is not a member of the California Independent System Operator (CAISO), As a separate Balancing Authority, it must be self-sufficient in providing reliable energy services under extreme events and is regulated by the Western Electricity Coordination Council (WECC), Below is an overview of the types of generation facilities constructed and managed by IID to deliver electricity to their customers. • All -American Canal Hydroelectric Generation: 32 MW • Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station: 14 MW • USBR Parker Davis Project: 32.6 MW • Yucca Steam Plant: 70 MW • IID Thermal Generation Plants: over 592 MW • Power Purchases: approximately 460 MW According to the 2018 Energy Integrated Resources Plan, electricity usage, or demand for IID's service territory in 2018 was recorded as 1,125 megawatts. Based on IID's latest projections, electricity usage is expected to increase by approximately 25 percent by 2035, with peak demand estimated to reach 1,395 megawatts. These estimates account for planned energy conservation programs and services that IID intends to implement, which will reduce the total demand required from generation facilities and power purchase contracts. IID currently serves approximately 159,000 residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Of this, about 61,900 customers, or 39 percent, reside within IID's current jurisdictional boundary. The remaining customers, approximately 97,100 customers, or 61 percent, reside in the Coachella Valley, outside of IID's legal jurisdictional boundary and their political divisions for IID Board of Director elections. Population projections prepared by IID and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) indicate that growth in the Coachella Valley service territory is expected to outpace population growth in Imperial County. Details regarding estimated service area population projections can be found in IID's 2020 Service Area Plan (Section 111,13, Table G-4), TABLE 4-3 - IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT ENERGY DIVISION BUDGET SUMMARY BY MAJOR CATEGORY 2022 IID Energy Division Projected Actual 2023 Budget 2024 Budget Revenue an. Funding Residentiall $300,393,800 1$310,940,2001 $312,089,900 Agricultural $11,222,500 $11,650,900 $11,701,400 Commercial $217,301,200 $225,438,000 $226,352,700 Industrial $3,157,200 $3,279,100 $3,332,900 Lights $2,486,500 $2,566,400 $2,582,900 Public Authorities $10,065,500 $10,430,700 $10,466,500 Interdepartmental $2,587,500 $2,599,600 $2,599,600 Public Benefit Charge $15,658,000 $16,158,700 $16,222,000 Interest Income $(2,971,703) $3,000,000 $3,500,000 Public Benefit Fund $2,852,900 $2,615,100 $2,615,100 Capital Contributions $18,867,800 $91,603,600 $54,023,900 Capital Loans $8,357,103 $9,893,700 $32,184,200 Cert. Of Participation $0 $44,386,800 $71,661,600 Proceeds Other Income $49,345,600 $40,894,000 $46,261,500 Total Revenue and $639,323,900 $775,456,800 $795,594,200 Funding Expenditures L Purchased Energyl $334,689,300 1$339,668,4001 $338,837,900 Operations and $148,086,000 $165,778,100 $168,409,600 Maintenance General and $19,315,300 $19,639,400 $20,021,200 Administration Energy Capital Projects $81,925,855 $181,859,200 $171,595,600 Support Services $16,677,445 $26,966,200 $49,454,100 Capital Projects Transmission Rate $1,600,000 $1,873,200 $1,800,000 Credits Other Operating $(3,600,000) $(2,600,000) $(3,900,000) Expenses Debt Service $40,630,000 $42,272,300 $49,375,800 OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY 10's Mission Statement The Imperial Irrigation District is a fiscally responsible public agency whose mission is to provide reliable, efficient, and affordably priced water and energy service to the communities it serves. 10's Vision Statement The Imperial Irrigation District will protect the Imperial Valley's water rights and energy balancing authority, deliver the highest level of customer service and maintain system reliability for the sustained benefit of the regional economy, the environment and the communities it serves in a fiscally responsible manner. 4.4.1 Governance Structure IID is governed by an elected five -member Board of Directors, who are responsible for overseeing the district's operations, policies, and finances. The members of the Board are elected by registered voters from the geographic divisions in which they reside with a general manager appointed by the Board to manage the day- to-day operations, All the district political divisions are located within Imperial County, but not coterminous with Imperial County. Customers in the Coachella Valley are currently unable to participate in IID Board elections. The IID has two primary operational departments, the Wafer Department and the Energy Department. Each department is overseen by the general manager's Executive Office and supported by four additional service departments; General Services, Information Technology, Finance and Human Resources. The IID Board of Directors is apprised and supported by the Executive Department, including Administration Services, which handles matters related to government affairs, real estate and risk management. 4.4.2 Jurisdictional Boundary and Extended Service Territory IID's jurisdictional boundary was amended by the BCPA of 1928 and the BCPA Agreement of 1932. Their jurisdictional boundary, also known as legal boundary, is entirely contained in the Imperial County, but not coterminous with Imperial County. In 1943, IID executed a purchase and sales agreement with CEPC. After the sales agreement was approved by the CPUC, IID was allowed to provide energy service to areas outside of its legal boundary and into Riverside and San Diego counties. IID's jurisdictional boundary and extended electrical service territory is presented in Figure 4-2, FIGURE 4-2: IID JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY AND EXTENDED ELECTRIC SERVICE TERRITORY RI - r r AI, Mai iMe. J:ar1-,1k3e Los Angeles T"5an,Serrliardino I i8a Finl 1prw r-:, M4 t f -dill 141.4r 4 Alil ' L .bl i�ul� I ' .nrcxlil . ilE- LLLV i III I, L }L ()range l f INI I. RiveTside fu f.�urr kel rl ' 1-6-1Il Stale Fri# rt_ € sctwsdldu Sari Meg 416VEr 6fel hlalgnal Fops u an Drew, ljtJ�n� x WE B 0 5 9� ZU 34 Mflep Symbology I I D Electric SeMea Territory Ile Jurisdictional RouInd ary County Boundary I Coachella Valley Cities ir� rr 3collstr Mlrl npnal rr,rnrry Rowje Irr7� lvl�xltalr San k_`ufs Rio C olorado SOlIYCOS, �StJ,.f�,�R�, G�3ht11ri, Ihf6rtrr3p, InCi#rfiEht P GOrp,. GE&�O, IJSGS. FAO, MPS, HFiCAN,C.aoBase,1G?J. Kadasler NL_ Mdnance Survey, EsoJapan METl. E-til canna (Dana Kong) ;cj opert5treetmar C7Fiir•MLOrs, oral line *1$ USEf tromrr,Ulllty Dula Saurce: CVVAD and II❑ €ledric Serwce boundary provided by FbveWde andlmparial LAFCO& County lines from Calibrnia Open Data Portal. Last updated W10f201 p Disofaimer This is NOT w otfieial map Dopudja and Wells ConstAng does not guarantee the aacura cy or d®la 4n tltils map Any errors of nr1'115srow shall no! w considered tt*e respanaibiiity of ❑opudta and Welty Consulting. w 1' Sey-4srj,,1-ML1kL. In a +'i awp . 4p GE01E G F!IPS r'Ant Ma Dopudja & Wells Sir-" 108 ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS This section will introduce key stakeholders involved in the development of the Study. Although there were additional stakeholders involved as part of the Studys outreach, the following stakeholders were identified by the Riverside and Imperial County LAFCOs and are members of the Coachella Valley Energy Commission (CVEC). Feedback and supplemental materials provided by stakeholders during outreach is further described in Section 8.1. This includes responses to the Studys electrical service questionnaire and input received during the individual stakeholder discussions. The CVEC was created by IID in response to Assembly Bill 1021. The Commission is tasked with providing immediate and diverse local representation by Coachella Valley stakeholders in IID's extended electrical service territory. The Commission is tasked with developing a long-term strategic plan for continued energy service to the Coachella Valley following the 2033 expiration of the 99-year lease between the CVWD and IID. 5.1 Coachella Valley Water District Established under the provisions of the California Water Code, Coachella Valley Wafer District (CVWD), previously known as Coachella Valley County Water District, was organized in 1918 as a County Water District, The district's jurisdiction now spans approximately 640,000 acres, primarily located in Riverside County, but also encompassing areas in northernly Imperial and northeastern San Diego Counties, CVWD has evolved into a multi -faceted agency that delivers irrigation and domestic water, collects and recycles wastewater, provides regional storm water protection, replenishes the groundwater basin and promotes water conservation. CVWD does not provide electrical operations or service to its customers and is currently under a service agreement with IID per the 1934 Agreement of Compromise. CVWD's primary fields of service include: • Domestic/drinking water treatment and distribution • Irrigation water importation and distribution • Wastewater collection and treatment • Recycled water distribution • Groundwater management • Regional sformwafer and flood protection Prior to 1943, the CEPC served as the primary electrical service provider for the Coachella Valley. Subsequently, CVWD entered into a partnership with IID to assume the responsibility of providing electrical services to the region, while acknowledging the advantages of securing hydroelectric power. According to the conditions of the 1934 Agreement of Compromise, CVWD is restricted from competing with IID on electrical service operations and sales through December 31, 2033. Although CVWD participates, the district is not a member of the CVEC. CVWD Mission Statement To meet the water -related needs of the people through dedicated employees, providing high quality water at a reasonable cost. 5.1.1 Governance CVWD is a special district established by the state legislature and certified by the State on January 16, 1918. CVWD is governed by a five -member Board of Directors elected to 4-year terms by district voters. Each director represents one of five divisions of the district and are elected at -large by all voters. CVWD policies are regulated by several state and federal agencies, including the State Water Resources Control Board, California Department of Public Health, and the California and United States Environmental Protection Agencies, ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS Because the District is a government agency and not a private company, it is not regulated by the Public Utilities Commission. 5.1.2 Jurisdictional Boundary CVWDs jurisdictional boundary encompasses the Coachella Valley and extends into Imperial County, southeast from the San Bernardino Mountains to the Salton Sea. The CVWD jurisdictional boundary and corresponding service area is shown in Figure 5-1. FIGURE 5-1: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY Symbology IID Elaatrta Sarrlae Soundaay CVWD Service Boundary fntersecled Area Coachella Valley City INDIO LAQUINTA COACHELLA RANCHO MIRAGE INDIAN WELLS CATHEDRAL CITY _ PALM DESERT - bEsr:RTHOTSPRINOS PALM SPRINGS Data Source: City, CVVVD, and IID Etectrir-Service baundArles provided by RIrvDMIde and Iniperial LAFCOs DiWaimer This is NOT an oFficiat map. Oopudla and Wells Ca-nsulfing does riot guarantee the e ccuracy of da#a in this reap_ Any errors or omisstuns shall not be aonsldered the n*Wonsibifty of Dopu0io and Wellg Consulting, ' r1, san�ait� r4o Wlll�g: �5�:, ht�RF. vA'-aT7115. L�.SG$ in9�rrfi9�th�RN'r P, � lR ran Esri Japrn M11Eri, Esn thlna} tip Kon4t, t4. K4re'"1.Earl Com r n�.}, ryGGC (e) Open +aelMap oo-ntri wp �. an C ihQ G1 ti1ct r Y ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS 5.2 City of La Quinta The City of La Quinta, situated in Riverside County, is a growing, premier desert resort destination recognized for its exceptional golf resorts. The governing body of the city, the La Quinta City Council, comprises five members and is led by Mayor Linda Evans. Mayor Evans is currently serving her third term in the position, The La Quinta City Council is responsible for formulating and implementing city legislation and policy -making. The City Council is responsible for appointment of the City Manager and the City Attorney. It serves as the Board of Directors for the Financing Authority. In addition, the Council serves as the legislative authority for the La Quinta Lighting and Landscaping District, The City of La Quinta is the southern most city in the Coachella Valley. The city is bordered by the City of Indian Wells on the northwest and by the City of Indio on the northeast, It is surrounded by the Santa Rosa mountain range on all other sides. The location of the City of La Quinta within IID's electrical service boundary and their sphere of influence is shown in Figure 5-2 A sphere of influence is a planning boundary outside of an agency's legal boundary (such as the city limit line) that designates the agency's probable future boundary and service area. The estimated population, as of 2021, is 38,000 and the city is a member of the CVEC. 5.3 City of Indio The City of Indio, situated in Riverside County, is the largest and fastest growing city in Coachella Valley best known for several large music festivals. The city was originally founded as a railroad outpost but transitioned into a agricultural hub and is now the sole producer of dates in the United States, yielding 41.4 million pounds of dates each year. The governing body of the city includes an elected City Council and City Manager, consisting of five elected members and a Council appointed City Manager. Each year, a new Mayor is selected by the Council, currently the Council is led by Mayor Oscar Ortiz. The Indio City Council is responsible for formulating and implementing city legislation, policy -making, and overseeing the City Budget. The City Council is the legislative body for the City, Public Financing Authority and Redevelopment Agency. The City of Indio is located on the eastern side of Coachella Valley, bordered by the city of La Quinta on the southwest and the city of Coachella on the southeast. The location of the City of Indio within IID's electrical service boundary and their sphere of influence is shown in Figure 5-2. A sphere of influence is a planning boundary outside of an agency's legal boundary (such as the city limit line) that designates the agency's probable future boundary and service area, The estimated population, as of 2021, is 90,000 and the city is a member of the CVEC. 5.4 City of Coachella The City of Coachella, situated in Riverside County, was first settled by J.L. Rector in 1989 when he came to the area to establish a mesquite terminal, Additional settlement in the area began after he and his brother L.B Rector tapped into an artesian water well in 1900. The governing body of the city includes an elected City Council and City Manager, consisting of five elected members and a Council appointed City Manager. All five members of the City Council are elected by the residents, with general Council Members serving four- year terms and the mayor serving two-year terms. Currently the Council is led by Mayor Steve Hernandez. The Coachella City Council is responsible for formulating and implementing city legislation, conducting public hearings, analyzing public issues, and managing city finances as well as general city operations. The City of Coachella is located on the most southeastern edge of Coachella Valley. The location of the City of Coachella within IID's electrical service boundary and their sphere of influence is shown in Figure 5-2. ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS A sphere of influence is a planning boundary outside of an agencys legal boundary (such as the city limit line) that designates the agencys probable future boundary and service area. The estimated population, as of 2021, is 43,000 and the city is a member of the CVEC. 5.5 Cove Communities Services Commission The Cove Communities Services Commission (CCSC) was established by City of Rancho Mirage, the City of Palm Desert and the City of Indian Wells to provide coordinated fire, police, and paramedic services. The Commission, comprised of six elected council members, two from each city, holds quarterly meetings. Hosting and administrative duties are annually rotated among the cities. Although each city now individually contracts for public safety services, the CCSC are actively engaged in regional programs and initiatives that affect all three cities. The estimated population for the cities included under the CCSC, as of 2021, is approximately 74,500 and the CCSC is a member of the CVEC. Individual city population projections can be found in Table 4-1, FIGURE 5-2: COACHELLA VALLEY CITIES AND CITY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE .J '4 lryKW Fi1P fie PALM SPRING$# l CATHEDRAL'CITY L r/ I RANCHO MIRAGE 1. _. PALM 0E3E11tT' I .. INVAN l4XLL5 1NDIo r COACHELLA i LtQUIN�TA Bri.i=R_ Liarmin IMEMW incre—nlPCotpY, GEBCO �0. =JR#1, NRCRN. UOaMe. 4GH, Katl-06F9r FlL. VrtEtwco s5 Anpnn. UETI E Cnn-0 {Fang kan91. {n} upenStrrer4: s tr.l Ile GIg,�,I�er CammvruLy Symbology EMIID Electrc 9erviceksee CVVJD 9—icM 9Ound.'W Caaohelta Valley GI#ies LACUINTA COkCHELLA RAMCHO M1IAGFz 11NVAN WELLS CATHEDFALCITY PAI-M IIESEI'a tmsr r HOT SRRli4G5 PALM SPRINGS GV SCH �INaio LAOUINTA COACHELLA RAP#C+i4 MIRAGE CATHEDRAL CITY ® PALM msl_" ® DESERT HOT SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS i SOUrCe Clrr SOI. CvWD. and Ill} Electric oire bovMarlei "ided by Riverel4e IR aMilllLWCOS. iaimer: 'Mic is NOT an ofFaial map udp and Mill; Camuffing drag not 'ends Ine ec[urocy of dep9 in mle i. Any errors or or Asioris shalt not be wered 1Ae resporablily 0 poi)uq;s violls Gort9Uhlrq ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS 5.6 County of Riverside Riverside County was formed in 1893 from parts of San Bernardino and San Diego Counties, These two territorial components comprise over 7,300 square miles. Its early years were tied to agriculture, but other industries soon took hold and contributed to the county's rapid growth. The governing body of the County is the Board of Supervisors. There are five separate districts based on population and other factors within the county. The Board of Supervisors is the governing body of the County, certain special districts and the Housing Authority. The Board enacts ordinances and resolutions, adopts the annual budget, approves contracts, appropriates funds, determines land use zoning for the unincorporated areas, as well as appoints certain County officers and members of various boards and commissions. Riverside County is located north of San Diego and Imperial Counites and south of San Bernardino County. Riverside Countys eastern neighbor is the State of Arizona, and its western neighbor is Orange County. The estimated population, as of 2021, is 2,5 million, making Riverside the fourth largest county in California by population. This population estimate is for the entire County, which extends beyond the boundary of the IID Coachella Valley electrical service territory. Individual population estimates for the cities located in Riverside County, which receive electrical service from IID are shown in Table 4-1. The County of Riverside is a member of the CVEC. 5.6.1 State Assembly Representation Riverside County is represented by six Assembly Districts (AD), AD 36, AD 47, AD 58, AD 60, AD 63, and AD 71. The two AD's of interest for this study are AD 36 and AD 47. Eduardo Garcia (D) is the current Assembly member of AD 36, representing Riverside County cities, Imperial County communities, and San Bernardino communities. He is the chair of the Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee and serves on several other committees such as Appropriations, Communications and Conveyance, and Utilities and Energy. Greg Wallis (R) is the current Assembly member of AD 47, representing Riverside County cities, including the City of La Quinta. He assumed office in December 2022 and is currently serving his first term as Assemblyman 5.6.2 District Supervisor The Riverside County Board of Supervisors consists of five separate districts, The district which oversees the Study area is the Fourth District. The Fourth District is the largest district in Riverside County by area. The Fourth District covers the eastern two-thirds of the County including the cities of Blythe, Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage. The current supervisor for the Fourth District is Supervisor V. Manuel Perez, The Fourth District also includes a number of district communities, each with its own distinct assets and issues. Ten of these communities are sufficiently large and active that the Board of Supervisors has established a Community Council to advise the Board of a wide variety of concerns that arise within the community, While they are strictly advisory in nature, the voice of the councils is heard by both the Board and other important entities such as the County Planning Commission. The Fourth District includes Bermuda Dunes, Desert Edge, Indio Hills, Mecca -North Shore, Sky Valley, Thermal -Oasis, Thousand Palms, and Vista Santa Rosa district communities. 5.7 County of Imperial Imperial County encompasses seven cities and eight unincorporated communities across 4,284 square miles. It was established in 1907 from portions of San Diego County. The county has a strong agricultural heritage, producing half of the nation's winter vegetables and abundant renewable resources such as geothermal, wind, and solar, It also offers various recreational activities including the Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area, the Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge, and frequent community events, ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS Although geographically ninth largest county in California, Imperial County is the smallest of the nine counties in Southern California based on population estimates, The governing body of the County is the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors is the governing body of the County, certain special districts and the Housing Authority, The Board enacts ordinances and resolutions, adopts the annual budget, approves contracts, appropriates funds, determines land use zoning for the unincorporated areas, as well as appoints certain County officers and members to various boards and commissions. Imperial County is underway with establishing and implementing a renewable energy overlay zone. These are areas where the Counfys General Plan is encouraging renewable energy development. The renewable energy overlay zone is concentrated in areas that the County has determined to be the most suitable for developing renewable energy facilities while minimizing the impact to other established uses. The overlay zones cover approximately 201,000 acres and can accommodate a range of technologies. Figure 5-3 provides an overview of the proposed renewable energy overlay zone. Imperial County is located on the most southeastern border of California. Imperial Countys northern neighbor is Riverside County, its Western neighbor is San Diego County, its Eastern neighbor is the State of Arizona, and its southern neighbor is Mexico. The estimated population, as of 2021, is 180,000 and the majority of this area is within IID's jurisdictional boundary. The County of Imperial is a member of the CVEC, 5.7.1 State Assembly Representation Imperial County is represented by AD 36. Eduardo Garcia (D) is the current Assembly member of AD 36, representing Riverside County cities, Imperial County communities, and San Bernardino communities. 5.7.2 District Supervisors The Imperial County Board of Supervisors consists of five separate districts as shown on Figure 5-4. The Chairman of the Board is Supervisor Ryan E. Kelly of the Fourth District. FIGURE 5-3: IMPERIAL COUNTY RENEWABLE ENERGY OVERLAY ZONE �t •r V I_ 8 10 20 miles Symbology II[) Electric Service Area Renewable Energy Source Geothermal Renewable Energy/Geothermal 1 3� t r C 4 { 1 San Lu1 Sources: Esd. HERE. Garmin?)ntennap���c�e� r � aorp,. GE�CC�, - USG5, FAG, NIPS. NRCAN deo.Base, r h4adastar NL. Qrdnamca Survey, Esri Japan. MET1, ESn China (Hong Kortp), (a) GpenS"alms p cuninbutors• and the 018 User Gbmmunity Data OUtct! IID Service Boundary provided by Riverside and Imperial LAI=COs- Energy Overlay provided by Imperial County. Disclaimer; This is NOT an official map. Dopudle and Wells Consulting does not guarantee the accuracy of data in this mapr Any errors oT ornissior«t: shall not be considered the iespansibility of Dopudja and Wells Consulting- M11 S l9rce Esri, HERE. Ga fir. #� IntermaO. incrsment P RCAfV, C�ea6ase; 1CyN, � LIIRl FIGURE 5-4; IMPERIAL COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICTS I :.::ora•r9rK Pnir: trrt'111 "r trtiXl,S f n Inman Rr-1 IOJan ': r1 I I •aI :: . i 1 -- rn.l E DISTRICT 1 T f,�axlrall � -0, 4 9 18 24. . Sourom Safi. HERE. Gamw, InbiNapjwemenl P Ci}- p,. CEECO, 1XCIQ. FAO..NPS• NRCAN, fik1jSaa2, GN, Kgda� fLNL OrdrralL�e SLIWey, Fsrl Japar4 METE, Sari (,hlrja {Hor}g�j;,t{ �C1penSkTeeEhlap Cori#nbutors, and the CAS User Comrnijnity SYMBOLOGY ® I I D E IectriIn, Service Bou ndary Irripana� County Supervis-oral Districts Imperial County Data Source, I I D 5ervicse Boundary provided by Riverside and Imperial LAFCOS. County Ilnes from Callfomla Open Data Portal. Last updated 911OF?-019 Supervisoral Districts provided by imperial County Disclaimer. This is NOT an cM6,91 map. Dvpudja and VWells Consulting does not guarantee the accuracy of data In this n-ep. Any errors or omissions shall not be considered the responsibility of Dopudja and Wells Consulting, ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS 5.8 Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission of Mission Indians, Ramona Band of Cahuilla Indians, Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians and Los Coyotes Indians Band of Cahuilla Indians. The Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians are a Chemehuevi people who are a federally recognized tribe whose reservation is located near the City of Twentynine Palms and the City of Coachella, California, In 1975, President Gerald Ford signed legislation recognizing the land and the tribe. The Twenty -Nine Palms Reservation was established by the Executive Order of 1895 in Twentynine Palms and was expanded in 1979 with an additional parcel in Coachella, California, Today, the Tribe has established business enterprises and governmental operations on its sovereign lands, with Spotlight 29 Casino and the Tribal Government Offices near the City of Coachella, and Tortoise Rock Casino near the town of Twentynine Palms. The Tribe provides employment to over 700 people, contributes to the community through charitable contributions, and supports the Tribe's government operations and programs. The Tribe strives to ensure a solid economic foundation for future generations by investing diverse and strategic business ventures within its reservation boundaries and the neighboring regions for self - resiliency. The Tribe is a member of the CVEC and a general overview of where the Tribe is located is shown on Figure 5-5. 5.9 Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians The Cahuilla People are known to be the first known inhabitants of the Coachella Valley, They have lived in the Coachella Valley and surrounding mountains for over 3,000 years. The Cahuilla can be generally divided into three groups based on the geographical region in which they lived; Desert Cahuilla, Mountain Cahuilla and Western (San Gorgonio Pass) Cahuilla, The Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians are Desert Cahuilla and are one of a total of nine Cahuilla Indian nations. The other eight are; Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Cahuilla Band The Tribe has established a successful business enterprise, with the opening of the Augustine Casino in the City of Coachella, Since its opening, Augustine Casino has been a growing business in the East Valley providing nearly $200 million in total salaries and wages which have gone directly back into the local economy. The Tribe also has existing power purchase agreement with IID and considering expanding their current operations, to assist in the development of renewable energy or creation of micro -grids, The Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians is dedicated to shaping a lasting legacy, today, and for many future generations. The Tribe is a member of the CVEC and a general overview of where the Tribe is located is shown on Figure 5-5. 5.10 Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians The Cahuilla People are known to have inhabited the Martinez Canyon since the early 1800's, In May of 1876, an Executive Order by Present Ulysses S. Grant created the Torres and Martinez reservations and combined them in 1891. The Tribe is governed by constitution and bylaws adopted by the general membership. The Tribe also manages and operates Red Earth Casino and is considering to expand their current operations. The Tribe also has an existing power purchase contract with IID and is interested in expanding this part of their portfolio to assist in the development of renewable energy. Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians' vision is to create opportunities in education, economic development, social services and other aspects of life for its tribal members and employees to become productive citizens and neighbors, thus creating a more harmonious community, The Tribe is a member of the CVEC and a general overview of where the Tribe is located is shown on Figure 5-5. ENERGY SERVICE STAKEHOLDERS 5.11 Cabazon Band of Cahuilla Indians Over three thousand years ago, long before the United States, the Cahuilla People called the Coachella Valley and surrounding areas their home. The Cabazon reservation was formally recognized in 1867 and gained national attention under the Supreme Court case California v Cabazon, The Cabazon Band of Cahuilla Indians, formerly known as the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, is a federally recognized tribe of Cahuilla Indians, located in Riverside County, California, The tribe has a population of approximately 806 members and is located northwest of the Twenty -Nine Palms Reservation. The Tribe has established a successful business enterprise by owning and managing the Fantasy Springs Resort Casino and several other dining venues throughout the city. The Tribe is a member of the CVEC and a general overview of where the tribe is located is shown on Figure 5-5. 5.12 Coachella Valley Association of Governments The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) is a regional planning agency which coordinates government services within the Coachella Valley. The three major planning departments within CVAG are: administration, energy and environmental, and transportation. The Administrative Department is responsible for overseeing administrative operations and managing the Coachella Valley Housing First program. The Energy & Environmental Department advocates for the sustainable use of natural resources and protecting the natural heritage in the Coachella Valley. The Transportation Department is responsible for the regional transportation program and the Coachella Valley Link and Coachella Valley Sync programs. CVAG currently has 15 members, including City of Coachella, Cathedral City, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, County of Riverside, and Tribal Nations. 118 FIGURE 5-5: TRIBAL NATIONS IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY l 1. 0®cheGl0 , ' wera•,+h rl n�.Fj,�W�Y+h►Yr . xi]Innn, A4F-LLA }TILLS L IH LID raucc, Ll ATA P•aSA OUNTA:rI,*, I %mrr e-.. ter. w�w�it* �4r ju L Irvun �_ sakaf 4.3s efwrrly?a.rrre. I I T I V L 5 5 _ I., r Snu s�1iCF? imlln_ interrrl3�. Increrneni"Earp., GcB[:•: k,l.. tjSQS AQ• NP$• NR- N, uQ4$acL, IGN, K4;0pg2r LL• �rt3rarrv= Suweey Esti Japan. h1.'I �sri Ghrna IHcng Kong). (c)CpenSuee.Map wntrib lor5, and the C.I3 Ilse[ Comrnunity -- Symbology riff EII•cow Servlcr Area City city Sol County Llne INDID INQIO Tribal Land RwervatiurA LA QUINTA LA QLIINTA - Augusllne Reservallon COACHELLA COACHELLA Cabazon Reservacm RANCHO MIRAGE RANCHO MIRAGE Torres-Manllier Rol;P aUorr INDIAN WELLS PALMS DESERT © Twomy-NIn$ Papns Rese^ranon PALM DESERT Data Source: City and 4ID Eleatne Servles boundarlee grov3dvd by Rlverwde snd IMPWI'al LAFCOs. Tribal Reservations from US DQpartmentoflhe Imenor Bureau pf Indian Affairs_ County liner hum C91 bmW Open Dale Portal. La updated W1(Y2014 Dmclainner_ Thm is NOT an official map. aapudra and Waft Consulting duos net gum ronlea IN aoouraoy of data Iri t1Ne map. Any errors or ornlsslond shall r+at be considered Iha reEpansibility of Dopudja and N%Corrsulbng. I r l��wlYrr ri-J17 Sarjrces: Ems, HERF, Ga lnrarmap, ir;E♦remenlP r RtoAN•GQgs;' y+ir K Ui SI$r HL. Ord non C8 Ma Dopudja & Wells Sir-" 120 UNCERTAIN ENERGY OUTLOOK FOR COACHELLA VALLEY Since executing the 1934 Agreement of Compromise, many electrical service requirements, community priorities, economic conditions and political interests have evolved. Over the years, IID's Coachella Valley electrical service territory has experienced a tremendous amount of growth and is projected to continue in the years ahead. Today, the majority of IID's electrical service customers are in the Coachella Valley and they have expressed concerns over the existing and future electrical service outlook for their communities. 6.1 Desire for Local Representation and Local Control Increasing population, system reliability, aging infrastructure, capacity limitations, electrification, new development, frequent service outages, and questions regarding timely implementation of capital improvements are among the top concerns and has driven the desire for Coachella Valley stakeholders to obtain representation on IID's Board. With the end of the 99-year lease of power rights nearing, local officials have begin to weigh options and discuss the outlook of electrical service and ability for the Coachella Valley to obtain local representation and control over electrical service matters. The following section provides an overview of a variety of electrical service and governance structures that provide local representation and local control for Coachella Valley customers. The following highlights the main concerns expressed by Coachella Valley customers receiving electrical service from IID; • Uncertainty whether IID's low and competitive rates are sustainable. • Frustration with system capacity limitations hampering economic development. • Uncertain electrical service outlook for Coachella Valley due to aging facilities and capacity limitations. • Unclear if facilities are properly maintained and in accordance with industry standards. • Concern with system reliability due to frequent and extended service outages in Eastern Coachella Valley. • Concern as to how new developments will be accommodated, and what the corresponding impact would be to existing electric rates. • Frustration with billing format and complex rate structure. • Concern as to how overdue capital improvements will be funded, or if projects will even be implemented. Ma Dopudja & Wells Sir-" 122 UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE This section examines the most common types of utility ownership models, the regulatory and governance structures these utility structures operate in, and associated implications to the electrical utility business. The following section provides a general overview of the various ownership structures and should be used in conjunction with the findings of this Study. It should be noted that the majority of the following proposed alternative service options can be developed to "best fit" the desired level of service ownership and associated degree of governance responsibility. In summary, Figure 7-1 presents three major types of utility ownership structures. Investor -owned utilities are granted service areas by the state government over a specified service territory. Shareholders hold stock and are commonly paid dividends based on assessment of many utility factors. Leading examples include Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric, and Arizona Public Service. This type of ownership structure is regulated within the state by the California Public Utilities Commission with limited opportunity for local representation and oversight. Public Utility District, also defined as Public Power Utilities or Special Districts for the purpose of this Study, serve as a publicly operated agency similar to water service and other public services. These utility structures share similar characteristics and implementation actions, therefore considered as one alternative option in this Study. Revenues are collected by the utility and subject to oversight and governance by an elected or appointed Board of Directors. This type of ownership structure offers the greatest opportunity for local control and representation. Municipal utilities are publicly owned entities, which must be created by voter approval. The creation of a municipal utility can be proposed by a citizen initiative or by the legislative body. Cooperatives, or also known as co-ops, are owned by their customers and operate on a not -for -profit basis. An elected Board of Directors provides oversight and can set policy and strategy over all business matters. FIGURE 7-1 - OVERVIEW OF MAJOR TYPES OF UTILITY STRUCTURES INVESTOR -OWNED UTILITIES (10US) MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVES (,CO-OPS") a Source: Rocky Mountain Institute. 2018. Navigating Utility Business Model Reform UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE Other entity types exist and include structures such as Generation and Transmission Cooperatives, Community Choice Aggregators, and Joint Power Agencies. These generally provide a utility structure which has responsibility over specific electrical service functions. These types of structures work closely with the underlying utilities and are flexible when defining roles and responsibilities. Each of these structures are further described below. 7.1 Investor -Owned Utility Majority of electricity customers in the United States are served by an Investor -owned Utility (IOU), which are private entities subject to state regulations and financed through a combination of shareholder equity and bond debt. IOU's operate as for -profit businesses and are the driving principle for this type of ownership structure. IOU's are corporate, for -profit companies that are either privately or publicly owned by shareholders. While some are owned by private equity, most IOU's are publicly owned and publicly traded. Figure 7-2 provides a summary of an IOU ownership model. Because these entities are for -profit, they must be regulated to ensure that the interests of consumers are being preserved. Each IOU is assigned a specific franchise service territory by the regulator and is responsible for serving all consumers within that area. No other entity can provide electric distribution services in the IOU's service territory. The CPUC provides oversight and determines the rates the IOU can charge and sets the conditions under which the utility can earn a profit. Figure 7-3 provides an overview of an IOU's governance structure. These entities tend to be large organizations that take advantage of economies of scale. Example utility types include Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, Pacific Gas and Electric, and Arizona Public Service. Neighboring IOU's to IID are shown in Figure 7-4. An IOU operates to achieve balance between: • Maximizing shareholder return • Providing reliable service to the grid • Maintaining affordable energy service to customers FIGURE 7-2 - INVESTOR -OWNED UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODEL INVESTOR -OWNED UTILITIES IOUS OPERATE AS A FOR -PI nT BUSINESS. AfUJLATIONS ATTEMPT TO MIMIC COM€"T MARKET CONDITIONS FOR MONOPOLY i`RANCHGES owner3Tup FuY�rkly traded Corpora OF6 owned t� share hOrdeM Re^n n4e ccMlectea Trcwn ra.es+esulstng km utll�ry =sLs that am passed Through to custemem Rc�tnrrc3 and lhdl^les atso odude ceruwt casts m theft vale base Pram liwerev on whtctt they varrs o rem. retLrn on "iotyr (ROP) n set al appToved rates and Rows track to sharenddors Management and An exo<.wv.-e feaderstnp team respor► ale To a Gamrnanc* board or duemm elected ay lr+e snweD dt L Managenwnt a'ten es cOused through oustn@" irlrts Regul abon end ove+stgnt Pudic ulWty comviussron IP Cj, shareraatdm; leder6 ana siatc er+r�anrnes4tai tggulatvrs Source of Captsai 1 Pmm a Baas and equrlyr Ir►ri wm etim O[her Key lindependera Do+oc pmdme s and otW generatom ffU3 atner corers aT Hulk syrstrm assets, regional I�'18t1�SW� � Tfp[urnl7��rpn pp{rdP6rSlfi4C¢MdCrN•S4ft2rn c tumors ,PTO s SO{ , aafacens naiinclrog Burr isles Source: Rocky Mountain Institute. 2018, Navigating Utility Business Model Reform 7.1.1 Statutory Authority of an Investor -Owned Utility Typically, electricity supplied by IOU's comes from a combination of self -generated power and power purchased from public and private markets. IOU's are considered monopolistic operations as they are protected from competition against other electric providers by state and federal legislation. Most IOU's sell power at retail rates to various classes of customers and at wholesale rates to other utilities, including federal, state, and local government utilities, public utility districts, rural electric cooperatives, and even other IOU's. Most IOU's follow a vertically integrated approach in delivering bundled generation, transmission, distribution and delivery services to retail customers. UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE Because this type of structure is privately owned and for profit, the CPUC has several programs to engage customers serviced by IOU's in CPUC proceeding and decision -making. The following programs are offered by the CPUC; • Consumer Affairs Branch to help resolve disputes between customers and their utility provider • Public Advisors Office to offer information on how to participate in CPUC proceedings • Business and Community Outreach Office to work and inform local communities on how to get involved with CPUC programs and policy making • Small Business Program to allow for business opportunities with state and local governments • Supplier Diversity Program to administer programs encouraging utilities to spend more than 20 percent of contracts to businesses owned by women and minorities. • Low Income Oversight Board to help ensure utility companies serve low-income customers with helpful programs and partnerships • Disadvantaged Community Advisory Group to advise the California Energy Commission on issues related to environmental justice and social equity. 7.1.2 Funding for an Investor -Owned Utility Revenue is collected from rates resulting from the utilities costs that are passed through to its customers, including additional costs to provide a return on equity back to shareholders. All functions of an IOU are regulated with oversight by the CPUC, including state and federal environmental regulations. 7.1.3 Role of the California Public Utilities Commission The CPUC is a regulatory agency responsible for overseeing privately owned public utilities within the state of California. The CPUC regulates services and utilities, protects consumers, safeguards the environment, and assures Californians' access to safe and reliable utility infrastructure and services. CPUC regulatory services include; • Auditing, accounting, financial, advisory, and law and Commission directive compliance monitoring. • Enforcement and Citation to ensure statutory mandates are carried out and that ratepayers and the public are protected from safety, reliability, service quality, and other violations. • Energy Licensing to register Electric Service Providers (ESPs) and Community Choice Aggregators (CCAs). FIGURE 7-3 - INVESTOR -OWNED UTILITY GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE .L 7- L��2. In C.UVEfthltlR SENATE :'Sownt�amrr NayY iw SNvk'e '� IOU BOARD INVINTOR.OWNED UTILITY CLFSiGMER7 W► SHAREH4LOERS C= 1 Source: California Municipal Utilities Association 7.1.4 Factors that Support the Formation of an Investor -Owned Utility The CPUC, as the underlying regulatory agency for California, oversees all investments and costs expended by IOU's, including regulatory decisions over what is included in the utilities' rates and the allowable rate of return. With several industry trends challenging the traditional ownership structures, primarily the need to implement necessary upgrades to system infrastructure and operations, this is forcing regulators to reassess how IOU's can deliver sufficient shareholder profit and maintain adequate bond ratings, while meeting new policy and customer objectives. UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE Adding to those demands, community choice aggregation and municipalization trends are putting pressure on IOU's to better meet customer needs, or face the possibility of losing customers. 7.1.5 Factors that could Challenge the Formation of an Investor -Owned Utility Revenue is collected from rates resulting from the utilities costs that are passed through to its customers, including additional costs to provide a return on equity back to shareholders. All functions of an IOU are regulated with oversight by the CPUC, including state and federal environmental regulations. 2022 California Code Public Utilities Code - PUC DIVISION 3 - Public Utility Franchises by Local Governments DIVISION 5 - Utilities Owned by Municipal Corporations 126 7-4: LOCATION OF IOU S IN CALIFORNIA 5ymbGlogy Data source; Pi ElecEric Sarviva bounawy uiulalmer; l r4s I$ NU, an affielal map_ Dopudla and QIED Electric GvvltgAraa provided by kivemde LAFCO was Can5ulling dam nai Q uara Met the a=urn cy of California IOU IDU Boundary from CaliPornia Baca in [his map. Any errors $ear Y�II97 ai#icBernGe Llr}erty MIRLea Pa0i�i6GEf3$ lQ4ki4 G4mfaanY San Dlago Gas & Elaclrlc Energy C4mmir0idrti t cal Updated 242p nromissibrrG shag not De consid►red the responsibility oifDopudje and'llilo Paci iCBrp S❑uthern CalHomtla Edison Cpnwung, UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE 7.2 Municipal Utilities, Public Utility Districts, and Cooperatives Municipalization, or public power ownership, is a way to offer an opportunity for greater local control and oversight for the community it serves, Specifically, Municipal Utilities, which may also be referred to as Publicly Owned Utilities or Special Districts in this study, operate as non-profit organizations subject to oversight by a City Council or an elected or appointed Board of Directors. In addition to compliance with state and local regulations, the creation and operation of Municipal Utility Districts are contingent on obtaining voter approval. Figure 7-5 provides a summary of a Municipal Utility District ownership model. Public power utilities operate under the following principles; not for profit, community owned, and locally controlled. Before a public utility can begin operations, they must comply with many state and local laws, which generally determine the types and the manner in which services could be provided. In California, state and local provisions authorize the creation of municipal utilities - specifically, the California Constitution (Article XI, Sections 5 and 9), Government Code Sections 6500 through 6599.2, and the Public Utilities Code (Division 6, Section 11501, et seq,) which applies exclusively to Municipal Utility Districts. The Public Utilities Code (Section 10002) separately addresses the acquisition of an IOU service territory in the event of acquisition by eminent domain. Public power comes in a variety of structures, including; • City -owned or municipal utilities, are governed by the local city council or another elected commission. • Public utility districts or special districts, are utility -only governance agencies, governed by a board of directors elected by voters within its service territory. • Cooperatives, or known as co-ops tend to be mostly in rural areas, which are private not -for -profit entities governed by a board elected by the customers within the co-op. Public power also exists in a variety of other forms, including entities such as Native American tribes, irrigation districts, mutual power associations and other public formed entities which can also provide electricity service to customers. IID is a public entity providing electrical service pursuant to the Irrigation District Law (California Water Code sections 20500 et. Seq.). 2022 California Code Public Utilities Code - PUC DIVISION 6 - Municipal Utility District Act FIGURE 7-5 — MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT OWNERSHIP MODEL MUNICIPAL UTILMES UNIS OPERATE AS NOT-FOR-PRONT BUSINESSES_ OWNED BY MuNICIPALMES AND OVERSEEN BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OR AN APPOINTED BOARID UtlW suveluft �vrnerstllp IHunlcipaurles meres IbutRoyoouo COI oefad ROM rato&; Ito $Wofi, MWIVMWI 13PYBOd su(ptv'sF r@venues care 3sametiffws su Prof rc rytere+,t pp4rl dSltiee My costs. floancial staawty Importenl ror bwo rairng managorncnt anti City "nagemQnt and unity daft Managomcmt can � be douse in larger mHunis RoguLnucwl and Chic-rslght provided by boards Dt rhy cuuKIL ow(swa mqufaled by PUCs In IM1Mt$4J Instances, federal and stale enoronmenial regulators Muniopaf tioncEs and otriet stendard c3obl markals. 5Curce 4l Capital cGbl Or cool of Wd to Oty's deb, iaSNig Wei Key 3u5Irw5s a0bilcoships Generation and IransrrW4sk i (GBTJ co -cps and Dut)pk payer agenC61S 10 CeOduct bulk purc nasM9 and own bulk sysier� :ssc' . Source: Rocky Mountain Institute. 2018. Navigating Utility Business Model Reform UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE 7.3 Public Utility Districts State law defines a public utility as any agency of the state for the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions within limited boundaries. A Public Utility District, or purposes for this Study, also a Special District, represents a distinct local government unit dedicated to delivering a specific range of public services within a geographically defined area. Public utility districts have the following distinguishing characteristics: • Constitute a form of local government • Have a governing Boards of Directors • Provides public services and facilities • Have defined boundaries Public Utility Districts have fundamental powers similar to counties and cities. Their legal jurisdiction allows them to sign contracts, engage in hiring practices, and procure real estate through either purchase or the power of eminent domain. Within the boundaries of existing legislation, they are also authorized to issue bonds, impose special taxes, levy benefit assessments, and impose service fees. The ability to finance capital improvements is a key element in determining if this alternative option would address stakeholder needs. In other words, if ownership of assets and facilities is a desired outcome, this alternative option should be considered. Similar to other forms of governance, Public Utility Districts have the capacity to initiate legal proceedings as well as be subject to litigation. These local agencies function with the objective of delivering distinct services to designated communities, Although they function as self - governed entities, they are responsible to the electorate within their jurisdiction. A Public Utility District operates under the purview of state regulations subject to the oversight by state officials who, for example, require annual financial reports to be submitted to the State Controller's Office. Utility Districts are obliged to abide by state laws regarding special taxes, bonded debt, public hearings, public records, and elections, 7.3.1 Statutory Authority of a Public Utility District Public Utility Districts operate either under a principal act or a special act. A principal act is a generic statute which applies to all Public Utility Districts. Occasionally, local circumstances don't fit the general conditions anticipated by the principal acts and would require new legislation. In those cases, the Legislature can create a special act district that's tailored to the unique needs of a specific area. Public Utility Districts, which are regional in nature, collaborative among multiple parties, have unique governing board requirements, provide specific services, or need special financing are typically special act districts. All principal acts are state law in the California state codes, whereas most special acts are not codified - written laws passed by the legislative and administrative bodies. Public Utility Districts are locally controlled utilities, governed by either an independently elected Board or a Board appointed by registered voters within the utility's jurisdictional boundary. Figure 7-6 provides an overview of a Public Utility Districts governance structure, Most Special Districts perform only a single function, The powers which state law authorizes, but a district does not currently provide, are called latent powers. Before a Special District can activate one of its latent powers, it needs approval by LAFCO. If the new service requires new revenues from special taxes or benefit assessments, the Special District must also get approvals from voters or property owners. The structure of governing boards for a Special District can differ depending on the district's size and capacity, Typically, Boards are comprised of a five member governing Board, but can vary in size. Notably, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has special legislation that requires a 37-member board. While the governing boards establish the general policies that guide the managers' activities, in many larger districts, the daily operations are overseen by professional General Managers, similar to a City Manager or County Administrator. UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE FIGURE 7-6 - PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE LOCALGOVERNIHG ivc*exRrwiaesrrares SDAAG rLISTWMERS LOCAL UTILITY scum I Source: California Municipal Utilities Association 7.3.2 Funding for a Public Utility District As with any government agency, a Public Utility District requires money to operate and to perform the following main functions; Administration, Operations and Maintenance, and Capital Improvements. As Special Districts, Public Utility Districts operate autonomously compared to municipal utilities. Because these entities operate independently of municipal control, they can exercise more budgetary control. Regardless, any new utility district will face a significant financial challenge from start-up and operational costs. Given these circumstances, Public Utility Customer customers are not likely to benefit from low utility costs during the utility's early, and potentially future years of operation. Because Public Utility Districts are public entities, they are subject to many regulations and processes involving state and local laws, as well as involvement by voters, who not only approve their formation, but also approve the utility's ability to provide service, make investments, and financing. Public Utility Districts generate revenue from three basic sources; taxes, benefit assessments, and service charges. General taxes; When the voters amended the California Constitution by passing Proposition 13 (1978), they stopped local officials from levying separate property tax rates. Instead, county officials collect a uniform 1 % property tax rate and allocate the resulting revenues to other local governments, following complicated formulas in state law. Most Special Districts get a share of these general property taxes, Proposition 218 (1996) constitutionally prohibited Special Districts from levying their own general taxes. Special taxes; Special Districts may levy special taxes with 2/3-voter approval. Often called "parcel taxes," these special taxes are usually a flat amount for each lot or each acre of ground. These are also known as Community Finance Districts (CFD), a method of financing public improvements and services when no other source of funding is available. A CFD may be established by any County, City, Special District or Joint Powers Authority, pursuant to California Government Code §5331 1-53368.3 (The Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982)• The CFD special tax is assessed against the property, but is not based on the assessed value of the property. This makes it a viable option to secure funding despite the limitations imposed by Proposition 13. Utility officials will need to develop a comprehensive debt policy to establish financial policies and principles. Benefit assessments; Many Special Districts can charge benefit assessments to pay for operating and maintaining public facilities and service programs that directly benefit property. Proposition 218 (1996) required assessment amounts to reflect the "proportionate special benefit" that the property receives. Benefit assessments are constitutionally distinct from taxes in several important ways. One key difference between assessments and taxes is that the affected property owners must give their approval for benefit assessments in a weighted -ballot election while special taxes require the voters' approval. Service Charges; Special Districts that run enterprise activities or deliver specific services can pay for their activities through monthly rates and service charges, UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE Public Utility Districts create debt to borrow the money they need for capital projects and paying off their general obligation bonds with higher property tax rates that require 2/3-voter approval, More unique borrowing opportunities include certificates of participation, promissory notes, and loans from the state and federal governments. Over the years, legislators encouraged utility districts to raise revenues with user fees and service charges and to reduce their reliance on property tax revenues. 7.3.3 Oversight and Regulation of a Public Utility District Public Utility Districts obtain authority directly from the community they serve through a governing body that serves independently from other government agencies. They are directly accountable to the community they serve. Many independent utility districts are governed by a constituent -elected Board of Directors, In some cases, the Board may be appointed by one or more other local elected officials, so long as the board members serve fixed -terms and none of the board members serve in an ex-officio capacity. California Government Code Section 1099 - Incompatible offices for publicly appointed or elected government officials. 7.3.4 Factors that Support the Formation of a Public Utility District Public Utility Districts operate not -for -profit and are governed democratically by the local City Council (as Municipal Owned Utility) or by an elected/appointed Board of Directors, This structure allows public policy objectives and customer demands to have direct influence over the operations of the utility. The ownership structure of a Public Utility District allows for the entity to define its role and responsibilities pertaining to electrical service provisions. 7.3.5 Factors that could Challenge the Formation of a Public Utility District With the creation of a new Public Utility District, this type of ownership model could be constrained by the need for additional staffing, financing, and technical resources. Despite being a not -for -profit entity, excess revenue is critical to allow for reinvestment in their assets, whether for growth or replacement of aging assets. Public Utility Districts often face the question of how to pay for investments if local policy or future assumptions are not realized. The possibility of these investments becoming stranded assets is a major concern, given that all risk falls on the utility and its ratepayers. Additionally, this structure could present challenges associated with existing elected officials and their ability to hold more than one public office under California Government Code 1099. 7.4 Electric Cooperatives Electric Cooperatives (Co-op) emerged as a result of the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935, The Executive Order establishing the REA and the passage of the REA Act, marked the first steps in a public -private partnership that helped bring electric power to businesses and communities willing to organize cooperatively and accept responsibility of providing safe, affordable and reliable electric power. 2021 California Code Public Utilities Code - PUC DIVISION 1 - REGULATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES PART 2 - SPECIFIC PUBLIC UTILITIES CHAPTER 5 - Electrical Cooperatives A Co-op refers to any private corporation or association organized for the sole purpose of transmitting or distributing electricity exclusively to its stockholders or members at cost. Figure 7-7 provides a summary of a Co-op ownership model. UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE In most cases Co-op's are able to purchase their wholesale power from non-profit entities, their own generation and transmission Co-op's, or from other federal agencies. Electric Co-op's have access to competitive financing, either through their own Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC), a Co-op owned and operated by and for the electric Co-op's of America, as well as access to more traditional forms of external funding, CFC's tend to have consistently high credit ratings, and therefore, they able to borrow at lower rates. For Co-op's that serve remote rural areas, there is potential access to alternative financing from the United States Department of Agriculture, now known as Rural Utility Services (RUS). This federal agency gives Co-op's additional access to low-cost financing to help build rural distribution and transmission lines, and new generation plants. In California, Co-op communities only have access to RUS loans and programs through the three distribution Co-op's, Anza, Plumas-Sierra and Surprise Valley, when combined, serve less than one percent of the electricity load in the state. Electric Co-op's collaborate closely through the National Rural Electric Co-op Association (NRECA) to take advantage of ways to reduce operating costs. 7.4.1 Oversight and Regulation of Cooperative Co-op's function as non-profit entities that are customer - owned and governed by an elected or appointed Board of Directors, This type of structure anchors firmly in the communities they serve and allows its members to closely regulate all business functions. California's electric Co-op's are established for the purpose of transmitting or distributing electricity exclusively to its customers at cost and are regulated by the California Public Utilities Code, Section 2779. FIGURE 7-7 - COOPERATIVE OWNERSHIP MODEL COOPERATIVES CO-OPS OPERATE AS NOT -FOR -PROFIT BUSINESSES. VERSEEN BY N EL CTED CUSTOMERS arvo r Utlllly Ste ucLura ovrnetsnp I Cusp *os FL4+_ members} Revenues erkd Revenue [onected from rams. no �Pxp1101 Rrolit PTOAtoteresl mollyall4n hta""went 5ndi Gwrrn4L-e Gy a c�s46mer-eletteo bWre Governencu Regulallon tPod Sfune are reguldlW by Pu1NIC uldny c0mmtWons. Ov,Drsi foderal and state clAvkOnrnentat togulalors Gavvruwnt 3o dis and grams Ie,g., Rural Willes SOwcE of CaDaal Sery" render USnepdtSmml 6rA}rKuhnrij, praval4 Gnonrlrlg f7thpr Key Busrnt 5 GAT w-orK In [onduct bulk purrnasing and awn RAlallor,sntps bulk system assets Source: Rocky Mountain Institute. 2018. Navigating Utility Business Model Reform 7.4.2 Factors that would Support the Formation of a Cooperative Similar to Municipal Utilities, Co-op's operate as not -for - profit entities and must have sufficient capital to support their operations, maintain infrastructure, and invest in new initiatives. Any net earnings are typically returned to the customers, who are also owners and members of the Co-op. As member owners, customers have the potential to be key drivers of change for the utility. Each member votes annually for members on its Board of Directors who have oversight and set policy for the utility. This ownership structure is less flexible compared to the other structures, as it is typically formed to provide specific services and must rely on the underlying utility for services not responsible of the Co-op, UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE 7.4.3 Factors that could Challenge the Formation of a Cooperative Lack of access to capital, need for short-term affordability, and staffing expertise are often challenges for newly formed Co-op's. Co-op's could also be dependent on other utilities depending on the Co-op's desire to be a vertically integrated utility or specific to either generation, transmission, and/or distribution services and assets. Depending on the desire and policy of the utility, Co-op's could be restricted in their ability to secure local low cost renewable energy, if contracts are secured with an outside utility for generation or transmission services. 7.5 Community Choice Aggregators Community Choice Aggregators (CCA) are governmental entities, cities, counties, or other eligible organizations that have opted to assume responsibility for certain aspects of their electricity generation, procurement, distribution, and sales to local residents within the service area of an IOU, It is important to note that CCA's are not IOU's. CCA's are not -for -profit entities that rely on the IOU for several services, including the use of its transmission and distribution system to deliver electricity, as well as providing maintenance, meter reading, and billing services to CCA customers, Figure 7- 8 provides an overview of a CCA's governance structure. • Enables local governments to aggregate electricity demand within their jurisdictions to procure electricity for its customers at cost. • The IOU provides transmission and distribution services, and continues to provide all metering, billing, collection, and customer service to retail customers that participate in a CCA. • Any city or county is eligible to from a CCA if located in an IOU territory. Cities and counties that are part of a Publicly Owned Utility or served by a Special District, such as Imperial Irrigation District, are not eligible to form a CCA, as they are already governed by a local board, The term "aggregate" refers to the process of bringing together the electricity demand of multiple customers within a specific geographic area, such as a city or county, in order to purchase or generate electricity for those customers collectively. This aggregation allows local governments to leverage the collective buying power of their communities to negotiate better rates and procure clean energy sources for their customers, CCA's may be run directly by a city or county government, or by a third party through a contractual arrangement with a Joint Powers Agreement. Once a CCA program is established or implemented, state regulations require that customers located within the member jurisdiction of the CCA be automatically enrolled in the program, unless they opt -out. In some cases, a CCA may opt to gradually introduce its program, enrolling customers at different intervals. FIGURE 7-8 - COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATORS GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE . r MC At GOVERNING otP-M Wprh—Fr ms GiIGGT�i1L�R7 � � � LOCPL AGENCY i a w»a:o�wc•e�. 100 D15rALQ TKwJ xxseN,-m saki, 9"NUO. Mkrb,Y,p• Source: California Municipal Utilities Association UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE 7.6 Joint Powers Authority The term "joint powers" is used to refer to the collaboration between government agencies that have joined forces to solve common problems by pooling their resources and powers. Joint Powers Agreements (JPA's) provide an alternative method for governments to deliver services. The acronym JPA stands for Joint Powers Agreement, Joint Powers Agency, or Joint Powers Authority. Municipal utilities and Public Utility Districts often partner together to establish a JPA. The agencies are legally distinct municipal corporations that allow for two or more public agencies to jointly exercise common powers in accordance with the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, California Govt. Code section 6500 and special legislation. Public officials of two or more public agencies are able to assert joint powers when forming a new legal entity and when establishing a joint approach in tackling a common issue, financing a project, or acting as a representative body for a particular activity, such as electrical provisions. In California, such powers can be exercised by federal agencies, state departments, counties, cities, Special Districts, school districts, redevelopment agencies, and other joint power organizations. JPA's have separate Boards from their member utilities and can be granted any of the powers possessed by their participating agencies, The formation of a JPA not only provides a creative approach to public service, but also enables Public Agencies to provide services more efficiently and cost-effective. 7.6.1 Joint Powers Agreement In a JPA, member agencies agree to work together to provide a service, and one agency may take the lead in delivering that service on behalf of the others. A JPA is designed to be flexible and highly customizable, such that it can be adapted to meet the specific requirements of each participating agency, The agreement can range from short-term, long-term, or perpetual -service agreements. In situations where the agreement necessitates a significant allocation of resources from one agency, additional staff may be necessary to ensure effective delivery of the services provided by the JPA. 7.6.2 Joint Powers Agency and Authorities An alternative way to exercise joint powers is to create a distinct entity separate from the member agencies by the use of a JPA. A JPA can create a new, and separate government organization created by the member agencies, but is legally independent from them. A Joint Powers Agency shares powers common to the member agencies, and those powers are outlined in the JPA, Sometimes public officials establish JPA's specifically to arrange capital financing by selling bonds. These bonds create the capital needed to finance construction of public facilities, Public officials sometimes call this type of JPA a Joint Powers Authority or a Public Financing Authority (PFA), 7.6.3. Statutory Authority of a Joint Powers Authority A JPA obtains authority to work together from a state law called the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, JPA's can exercise only those powers that are common to their member agencies. JPA meetings are open to the public and subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act. Further, JPA's must follow the Public Records Act, the Political Reform Act, and other public interest laws to ensure political transparency. The California Government Code Section 6502 provides that, if authorized by their legislative or other governing bodies, two or more public agencies by agreement may jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties, including and not limited to, the authority to levy a fee, assessment, or tax, even though one or more of the contracting agencies may be located outside this state. UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE The Joint Exercise of Powers Act authorizes two kinds of JPA arrangements; • The first allows two or more public agencies to contract to jointly exercise common powers. • The second allows two or more public agencies to form a separate legal entity. This new entity has independent legal rights, including the ability to enter into contracts, hold property and sue or be sued. Forming a separate entity can be beneficial because the debts, liabilities, and obligations of the JPA belong to that entity, not the contracting parties. The formation of a JPA is relatively uncomplicated, requiring only the signing of a joint powers agreement by the member agencies. A JPA begins when public officials negotiate a formal agreement that spells out the member agencies' intentions, the powers they will share, and other mutually acceptable conditions that define the intergovernmental arrangement. Each member agency's governing body then approves the joint powers agreement. An agreement that creates a new joint powers agency describes the size, structure, and membership of the JPA's governing board and documents the JPA's powers and functions. State law allows a JPA to issue revenue bonds without voter approval, provided that each of the JPA's member agencies adopts a separate local ordinance. A city, for example, needs majority -voter approval to finance the expansion of its sewer plant with revenue bonds. On the other hand, if the city and IID created a JPA, the JPA could issue the revenue bonds without voter approval if the City Council and the District's Board of Directors adopted authorizing ordinances. 7.6.4 Funding of a Joint Powers Authority As with any government agency, a JPA needs money to operate and there are two popular funding methods; first is to create a revenue stream, and second would be to raise capital by issuing bonds or special tax by forming CFD's in partnership with its members. Although JPA's do not need voter approval before issuing bonds, each member agency must pass an ordinance. Those ordinances face a 30-day period in which voters can object by signing referendum petitions that trigger an election. If there is no referendum petition or if the petition fails to qualify, the JPA can sell the bonds and use the proceeds to build improvements or buy equipment. JPA's that provide financing and sell bonds for multiple agencies pay for their operations by collecting fees from their member agencies. A CFD is a method of financing public improvements and services when no other source of funding is available. A CFD may be established by any County, City, Special District or JPA, pursuant to California Government Code §53311-53368.3 (The Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982). The CFD special tax is assessed against the property but is not based on the assessed value of the property. This makes it a viable option to secure funding despite the limitations imposed by Proposition 13. Officials will need to develop a comprehensive debt policy to establish financial policies and principles. The process to administer a CFD shall be in accordance with applicable Government Codes. 7.6.5 Public Financing Authority In addition to the financing options presented above, the JPA can also form a Public Financing Authority (PFA), established under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act for the purpose of issuing tax-exempt and taxable bonds for funding capital improvements. Bonds issued by this JPA provide the capital to build public facilities and the costs will be paid back over time by the Authority and from the revenue generated by the projects. The PFA may issue bonds and loan the proceeds to one or more of its member agencies who are responsible for the debt service. 7.6.6 Oversight and Regulation of a Joint Powers Authority The formation of a JPA begins with a formal agreement that specifies the members' intentions, the powers that they will share, and other mutually acceptable conditions that define administration arrangements. UTILITY OWNERSHIP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE JPA's can exercise only those powers that are common to their member agencies, A JPA's governance structure depends on what the members agree to. The legal authority for all JPA's comes from the Joint Exercise of Powers Act. 7.6.7 Factors that would Support the Formation of a Joint Powers Authority Similar to Public Utility Districts and Co-op's, JPA's are also not -for -profit and must have enough capital to support operations, maintain infrastructure, and invest in new initiatives. JPA's are flexible and allows any government agency to participate, the Joint Powers Act permits its member agencies to negotiate their level of commitment and structure their own governing Boards. JPA's also allow for the ability to finance capital improvements and authorize purchase agreements. 7.6.8 Factors that could Challenge the Formation of Joint Powers Authority JPA's require mutual trust to form. Getting separate public agencies to cooperate can be difficult because each organization has its own powers, purposes, and politics. If a member agency decides to terminate their agreement, the departure can harm the JPA's long-term financial strength and purchasing capabilities. 7.6.9 Comparison Between a Joint Powers Authority and Public Utility District The comparison that follows summarizes the differences and similarities between a JPA and a Public Utility District. Purpose Statutory Authority Joint Power Authority Generate Saving to Customers Provide Reliable Service Public Utility District Generate Saving to Customers Provide Reliable Service Provides Local Control and access to wholesale Provides Local Control and access to wholesale power California Constitution (Article XI, Sections 5 and 9) Public Utilities Code (Section 10002) regarding the acquisition of IOU service territory. Government Code (Sections 6500-6599,2) If the member is a city department, it can be governed by the citys legislative body or appointees of the legislative body (and City Governance Mayor, in some cases), or governered by an elected or appointed board the JPA board either operates independently or with oversight by the legislative body, power Public Utilities Code (Sections 11501-14403.5), Public Utilities Code (Section 10002), and Public Utilities Code (Sections 15501-18055) Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (applies to electric Municipal Utility Districts). Government Code (Sections 6500-6599,2) Governed by an elected independent utility board serving in staggered terms and elected by district residents. Directors have decision -making authority over all major functions of the utility. Ma Dopudja & Wells Sir-" 137 STUDY APPROACH AND ANALYSIS To assist with the development and analysis of the alternative service and governance options, extensive stakeholder outreach was conducted. Stakeholder discussions established foundational objectives that provides insight to how well each alternative option performs against status quo and stakeholder interests. The following section overviews the outreach effort and feedback received for the development of the Study. 8.1 Stakeholder Outreach and Feedback Received One of the most important aspects when identifying potential alternative service and governance options is to gain a clear understanding of the needs of the entire electrical service territory, In October 2022, the Study initiated a task to engage with an extensive roster of Coachella Valley stakeholders located in IID's extended electrical service territory. This list of stakeholders was provided by the Riverside and Imperial LAFCO's. To generate thorough feedback from the maximum number of stakeholders, the outreach effort involved a comprehensive electrical service questionnaire and a series of stakeholder discussions, To allow for a successful stakeholder driven input process, outreach was designed to address the following key topics with each stakeholder group. • Identify critical items and key topics. • Understand concerns and drivers for electrical service. • Discuss potential reorganizational structures compared to status quo. • Explore strategies for future electrical service and governance structures in response to AB 1021, • Discuss desired service roles and responsibilities. • Identify level of ambition to pursue an alternative electrical service and governance option. 8.1.1 Electrical Service Questionnaire and Responses To maximize feedback from as many stakeholders as possible, outreach consisted of an electrical service questionnaire and a series of stakeholder discussions. The following section will provide an overview of the feedback received and how this information was used for analysis of the alternative options. The electrical service questionnaire consisted of fourteen questions and was provided to approximately 55 stakeholders in October 2022. A total of twelve completed responses to the questionnaire were received. The primary purpose of the questionnaire was to; • Understand the extent of knowledge and interest in considering potential alternative electrical service and governance options. • Obtain preliminary feedback to help facilitate content and discussions with each stakeholder group. Despite the small sample group of responses, in general, several underlying themes emerged from the feedback received by stakeholders and are summarized below; • Little interest in pursuing a merger with an IOU. • Preference for public power, assuming IID desires to maintain continuity of service, • Preference for a special district, JPA or entity with more than one City and/or utility as partnering members, for concepts involving formation of a new public utility, • Conviction that, regardless of alternative options, local representation is a must. • Uncertainty as to whether IID's low and competitive rates are sustainable, • Recognition that electric infrastructure upgrades and expansions are needed for Coachella Valley as existing capacity limitations are hampering economic development, STUDY APPROACH AND ANALYSIS • Uncertainty with the electrical service outlook due to aging facilities and capacity limitations, • Concern regarding frequent and extended service outages in Eastern Coachella Valley, • Uncertainty as to how new residential and commercial developments can be accommodated and their corresponding impact on existing electric rates. • Frustration with billing format, complicated rate structures, and lack of transparency. • Uncertainty if and how overdue capital improvements are to be funded, • Recognizing that planning is a critical component in mitigating excessive financial risk. • Mixed thoughts regarding the degree of electrical service role and responsibilities, 8.1.2 Individual Stakeholder Discussions In addition to the electrical service questionnaire, the Study team conducted a number of individual stakeholder discussions to further obtain insight on matters related to both existing and future electrical service provisions, with an emphasis on services for the Coachella Valley. To facilitate these discussions, a presentation was prepared and distributed in advance, which included targeted objectives and goals for each discussion topic. A total number of nine discussions were conducted and consisted of both in -person and remote meeting formats. The main goal of the discussions were twofold. The first goal was to obtain additional insight on items of interest, concerns, and perspectives related to current and future service and governance roles. The second goal was to understand the desired responsibilities from Coachella Valley stakeholders. The following section provides a summary of the discussions, feedback received, when the discussion occurred, who participated, and if supplementary information was provided. Individual stakeholder discussions were conducted with the following stakeholders as follows: • November 15, 2022: Sky Valley Community Council • November 17, 2022: Imperial Irrigation District • December 2, 2022: the Cites of La Quinta, Indio, Coachella, Cove Communities Services and Palm Desert • December 6, 2022: Coachella Valley Water District • December 8, 2022: Tribe of Torres -Martinez • December 8, 2022: Tribe of Augustine • December 15, 2022: General session with over ten different local community and special interest groups • January 3, 2023: Imperial County • January 17, 2023: Follow-up with Cities of La Quinta, Indio, Coachella, Cove Communities Services and Palm Desert • January 24, 2023: Chair of the Coachella Valley Energy Commission • February 24, 2023: Tribe of Twenty -Nine Palms In addition to the discussions mentioned above, stakeholders also provided supplemental input in the form of historical documents, letters, and other Study related reports. A summary of these items is below: • Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability: o Eastern Coachella Valley Input for the Alternative Governance Structure and Service Provisions, dated March 24, 2023. o Prior comment letter regarding East Coachella Valley representation, dated March - October 2021. • Coachella Valley Energy Commission: letter regarding governance alternatives for consideration, dated February 2023, In general, several of the interests, concerns, and underlying themes identified from the energy service questionnaire aligned and were reiterated during the individual stakeholder discussions, The feedback gathered during the discussions was consolidated and is summarized into the seven main topics below: STUDY APPROACH AND ANALYSIS Affordability r O 1 Existing rates are competitive and any proposed alternative service options should consider short and long-term rate implications. L J Economi(, ^-••-'---tent Developments are being impacted and concerned about how these, and other 00 new developments will be served, along with the associated impact to existing +'' customer rates. Financing How will upgrades and expansions be funded, expenses should be equitable and based on benefits received. Representation Representation is top priority and required regardless of which alternative service option is considered. Ind6oii y iv�i Aug Concerned with increased electrification and the plan for achieving renewable energy goals. Local rrograms O— Desire for IID to increase local programs and incentives, including power O purchase programs with local communities for solar, geothermal, and other generation opportunities. LVGUI %-U1111U1 A• Q •A Desired by stakeholders, but degree of role and responsibility was uncertain. AA STUDY APPROACH AND ANALYSIS In order to evaluate how each proposed option addresses the interests and concerns of stakeholders, foundational objectives were established. The following section describes how the feedback received was used to establish foundational objectives for performing analysis of the alternative service and governance options. 8.2 Analysis of Alternative Options Although each alternative service and governance option may achieve different outcomes, the Study has established the following criteria to facilitate an assessment of the degree to which each alternative option addresses the desires of the stakeholders. These fundamental objectives were derived from stakeholder feedback and were utilized during the analysis phase to ascertain how each alternative option compares to the status quo. 8.2.1 Establishing Stakeholder -Driven Foundational Objectives The following foundational objectives were established to aid in the review and assessment of each alternative option and derived from input received by all stakeholders. As each stakeholder may have different core objectives, stakeholders may assess the performance of each alternative option under a distinct subset of foundational objectives, leading to varying conclusions. To address this matter, the ensuing analysis was conducted to provide stakeholders and policymakers with a general indication of which alternative option may optimally cater to their needs based on the established foundational objectives. It's important to note that the findings of this analysis will need to be aligned with the desired level of responsibility each stakeholder is willing to undertake in providing electrical service provisions for the Coachella Valley service territory. The intersection of these two elements will be key in identifying the best fit alternative option for the Coachella Valley service territory. • Services provided by a Public and Locally Governed Entity_ Ability for all eligible, registered voters within the Coachella Valley electrical service territory to be an appointed or elected official for purposes of providing oversight and supervising activities of the underlying electrical service entity. • Provides Representation for Coachella Valley Customers: The service and/or governance structure provides each appointed or elected official local oversight, supervision, and control of all functions of service (including assets) owned and managed by the proposed utility. Local control is provided for assets not owned and managed by IID. Provides the local official with authority to approve or oppose actions of the utility and the right to adopt sound and ethical governance and financial management policies in alignment with local policies. • Maintain an Advisory Role for Non -Responsible Electrical Service Provisions: Provide an appointed or elected member of Coachella Valley the ability to provide impartial third -party advice to the IID Board of Directors on electrical service provisions which are not the responsibility of the newly formed entity. Ability for Coachella Valley members to provide the IID Board of Directors recommendations, guidance, and knowledge on matters related to these services through an advisory committee and/or commissions. • Ownership Structure Must Provide Flexible Financing Opportunities: Ability to impose rate increases, secure external funding, issue municipal bonds, or form a financing authority to support a capital improvement program (CIP) and/or initial costs for acquiring existing electrical facilities. • Structure that Can Own Electrical Assets: The alternative service option provides the ability to acquire and own underlying electrical assets for electrical generation, transmission, and/or distribution services. STUDY APPROACH AND ANALYSIS • Provides Coachella Valley with Oversight of Financial Polices: Governance structure that provides Coachella Vally customers oversight and supervision of financial policies, rates, and charges for electrical services. To endorse polices that administer equitable rates structured to support economic growth and ability to recover cost of service. • Oversight of Capital Planning to Support Economic Development: Governance structure that permits local oversight of capital improvement planning and implementation. Supporting timely planning and capital investments to accommodate growth and development in the underlying community. • Structure Easy to Implement: Proposed structure should require a limited amount of coordination to implement the proposed service and/or governance structure, including legal, financial, and legislative complexity as compared to status quo. • Ability to Expand Public Benefits: Governance structure that permits Coachella Valley customers oversight and supervision of customer programs and incentives. To endorse policies that support state initiatives and local community interests. • Achieve Industry Maintenance Standards: Governance structure that permits Coachella Valley customers oversight of operational and maintenance services. To support business practices that promote efficient and reliable service by endorsing policies that achieve industry standards for preventative maintenance and service. • Use of Efficient Public Resources: Proposed structure should leverage existing resources to help minimize the need to recreate established policies and require additional financial resources. To endorse policies that support the ability to execute service agreements with IID, or other, for established electrical service provisions. • Promote Local Renewable Energy Programs: Structure that provides Coachella Valley customers oversight and supervision of renewable energy opportunities and local generation programs; including solar, wind, geothermal and other eligible resources. Supporting partnerships with regional partners interested in local renewable generation opportunities. • Ability to Achieve Vertically Integrated Utility Status: Structure that could allow for the complete oversight and governance of all electrical service provisions associated with generation, transmission, and distribution. A utility ownership structure that could be expanded to provide the greatest regulatory control and monopoly over all aspects of electricity services provisions. • Ability to Adapt to Future Changes and Responsibilities: Structure that can be modified to align with future changes in the members roles and responsibilities of utility ownership and/or governance. • Minimizes Risk to Rate Payers. Structure that has the potential to reduce or limit the amount of legal and/or financial risk to the members and community it serves regarding start-up, implementation, and ongoing operational costs. • Provides Local Control for Distribution Assets: Structure that can provide Coachella Valley customers with oversight and supervision of capital planning, upgrades, and expansions related to local distribution facilities. • Maximize Public Involvement: Governance structure that will endorse public policies to promote engagement and collaboration with the local community to obtain public input throughout the entire decision -making process. 1r, Ma Dopudja & Wells Sir-" 143 ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS This section will present several alternative electrical service options for consideration. However, the question remains of how the service territory should proceed with any of these options. While these alternative options provide stakeholders and policy makers with a general indication of the best -suited alternatives, other conditions must also be considered when determining which options are pursued and timely to implement, In general, each alternative option should be aligned to match with the appropriate scale and ambition of the service territory. Depending on the existing regulations and underlying objectives within the service territory, stakeholders are likely to have varying perspectives on which option is more suitable for implementation. This section focuses on two alternative electrical service options for providing continued publicly and/or independent system operator owned and managed electrical service in perpetuity to IID electrical service area customers prior to, and after, the expiration of the 99-year lease for power rights made between the IID and the CVWD. Both options include a number of alternative governance structures that can be considered for potential implementation, It should be noted that the following alternative options are not exclusive and therefore, a variety of combinations can exist, i.e. forming a new Public Utility District and joining with IID through a JPA. To help stakeholders, regulators, and policy makers prioritize the potential alternative service options, this section of the Study identifies the following; • A range of alternative options with different degrees of complexity such that stakeholders can determine their required level of effort in developing and advancing the implementation of the proposed alternative structure. • Advantages and disadvantages of alternative options, including considerations regarding policy, service and financial implications. 9.1 Required Capital Investment Common to all Options Many cities and utility districts administer Capital Investment Program (CIP) to assist with planning and identifying critical capital infrastructure projects to renovate, repair, or expand existing facilities. Projects could range from minor, low cost to multi -year program expansions. This effort is necessary in order to identify the extent of near and long-term capital improvements to sustain operations and assess funding needs to support implementation. Based on information shared by IID, there are several capital improvements needed to facilitate growth and development. Infrastructure upgrades and additional generation resources are necessary to serve additional growth in Imperial and Coachella Valley. The capital requirements to serve the additional growth is estimated to be $800 million. This includes approximately $500 million for additional infrastructure and substations, and $300 million for additional generation resources to support the growth and development. Although the capital investment indicated above is for Imperial and Coachella Valley, it would likely not go away under any of the options presented below. A capital investment would be required and common to all options. No further evaluation was performed on the capital investment provided by IID due to limited data received for this Study. The extent of capital investment would vary by option and must be a consideration when evaluating each alternative electrical governance option. After the parties determine which of the following alternative option(s) are to be considered, evaluations should be performed to determine anticipated cost -of - service and associated rate and operating expense for the desired role and responsibility of the proposed entity. Performing cost evaluations at this stage is difficult due to several unknown factors to adequately estimate valuation of the underlying electrical facility assets under consideration. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS 9.2 OPTION 1: IID Continues to Provide Electrical Service to the Coachella Valley Territory Under this option, the following alternative service and associated governance options are provided for stakeholder consideration. The reader can supplement the following section with details pertaining to each governance structure provided in Section 7. Service Alternative Option No. 1 - Imperial Irrigation District continues to provide electrical service provisions for the Coachella Valley service territory. Under this service option, the following alternative governance structures can be considered. 9.2.1 Alternative Governance Structures for Service Alternative Option No. 1 The proposed alternative governance structures aim to ensure proportional representation on a governing board that will have primary jurisdiction over all electrical service matters by extending voting rights to eligible voters residing within the Imperial Irrigation District electrical service area. The following options do not affect the water service area boundaries of the Imperial Irrigation District, which will remain under the sole responsibility of the current IID Board of Directors, thereby isolating water rights and management from electrical service matters. GOVERNANCE OPTION 1.A - Maintain status quo. Under this governance option, the following should be considered: • This option would maintain the existing service and governance structure for IID and the Coachella Valley service territory. • Would not address the concerns of the Coachella Valley stakeholders. • No reorganization, proceedings, or special elections are required. • Coachella Valley stakeholders would not have direct governance control or have representation over electrical service provisions, • CVEC continues to provide advisement to IID Board of Directors. • If additional funding is necessary, individual cities could adopt as needed charges for local upgrades and expansion of local distribution facilities. Per ongoing CVEC discussions. • Can provide the opportunity to reform existing electrical service provisions/programs to align with Coachella Valley stakeholder and local community needs, i.e. local power purchase contracts and programs. • A comprehensive debt policy should be established to define financial policies and principles to support economic development and additional growth in both service territories, • Having the ability to administering potential change to Power Rates will be limited per Section 19 of the Agreement of Compromise. • Does not mitigate the legal complexity or legislative challenge associated with the conditions of the 1934 Agreement of Compromise. • Reduces or eliminates additional risk, as no additional start-up or reorganization debt is required. • Eliminates the need for additional staff and related services by utilizing established IID business functions. • No financial and/or operational impact likely to existing IID operations. • To note, IID does not receive a portion of the one - percent tax levy from the Coachella Valley service territory located in Riverside County, GOVERNANCE OPTION 1.111 - Annex the Coachella Valley electrical service territory into IID. Under this governance option, the following should be considered: • Would expand the jurisdictional boundary for IID and include the Coachella Valley service territory. • Reorganization, proceedings, and/or special elections would be required, • Allows eligible voters from Coachella Valley to participate in IID Board of Director elections. • Coachella Valley stakeholders would have direct governance control and have representation on electrical service provisions. • This option aligns with the recommendations from Riverside LAFCO Study 2006-61-4. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS • Division boundaries for the Board of Directors could be established in a similar approach per previously adopted IID Resolution No. 50-2021. • New legislation would be required to authorize exclusive voting rights by elected officials from Imperial County on all water -related business functions and decisions. • Management and ownership of electrical facilities and assets would remain under IID. • The annexation would result in the termination of the 1934 Agreement of Compromise. • A comprehensive debt policy should be established to define financial policies and principles to support economic development and additional growth. • Potential to improve economic development by having the ability to adopt rates and charges based on cost -of -service. • Opportunity to reform existing electrical service provisions to align with Coachella Valley stakeholder interest and their desire to implement energy programs for solar and other local generation opportunities. • Policies should be established to administer a sustainable capital improvement plan to assist with additional growth and development requirements. • This option limits the amount of risk by not requiring additional debt and long-term financial obligations from acquiring new assets and/or staffing requirements when forming a new entity. • Reduced implementation complexity by utilizing existing business functions and processes established by IID. • Potential for complex legal negotiations and/or legislative challenge associated with the conditions of the 1934 Agreement and annexation process. • Minimizes financial and/or operational impact to the existing IID Energy Division. • Could result in a financial impact to the CVWD and corresponding hydroelectric generation rights on the canal. • To note, IID does not receive a portion of the one - percent tax levy for the Coachella Valley service territory located in Riverside County. GOVERNANCE OPTION LC - Create a new sub -Board of Directors to provide oversight on all electrical service provisions related to Coachella Valley, and establish an electrical service jurisdictional boundary for IID's Coachella Valley service territory. Under this governance option, the following should be considered: • Would create a new jurisdictional boundary for IID and include the Coachella Valley service territory. • The existing IID jurisdictional boundary would remain and provide oversight of business functions not responsible of the sub -Board of Directors. • Allows eligible voters from Coachella Valley to participate in IID sub -Board of Director elections. • Coachella Valley stakeholders would have direct governance control and obtain representation on electrical service provisions for Coachella Valley. • Reorganization, proceedings and/or special elections would be required. • Sub -Board of Directors would provide oversight and governance on a portion, or all electrical service provisions for the Coachella Valler service territory. Exact roles and responsibilities could be established by the parties. • New legislation would be required to authorize exclusive voting rights by elected officials from Imperial County on all water -related business functions and decisions. • Management and ownership of electrical facilities and assets would remain under IID. • Provides an opportunity for locally elected officials from the Coachella Valley to reform existing electrical service provisions to align with community needs, and the greater Coachella Valley service territory. • A comprehensive debt policy should be established to define financial policies and principles to support economic development and additional growth. • An Executive Director and/or additional staff could be required to administer the new subdivision. • Provides a solution for the 1934 Agreement of Compromise and the ability to update existing financial policies to help establish equitable rates and charges for the service territories. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS • This option has the potential to mitigate and reduce the legal complexity and legislative challenge associated with the conditions of the 1934 Agreement of Compromise. • This option limits the amount of financial risk by not requiring additional debt and long-term financial obligations from acquiring new assets and/or staffing requirements when forming a new entity. • Reduced implementation complexity by utilizing existing business functions and processes already established by IID. • Minimizes financial and/or operational impact to the existing IID Energy Division. • Could result in a financial impact to the CVWD and corresponding hydroelectric generation rights on the canal. • To note, IID does not receive a portion of the one - percent tax levy for the Coachella Valley service territory located in Riverside County. GOVERNANCE OPTION 1.11) - Coachella Valley Parties Establish a Joint Powers Authority with IID. Under this governance option, the following should be considered: • No reorganization, proceedings or special elections are required and maintains IID's existing jurisdictional boundary and extended electrical service territory. • Will not change the existing IID Board of Directors structure. • Can establish a multiple party JPA with Cities, Tribal Nations, State, and Counties. • D to be a member of the JPA. • Coachella Valley stakeholders would have direct governance control and obtain representation on electrical service provisions for Coachella Valley if desired by the JPA. • To function successfully, would likely require all Coachella Valley parties to become members of the JPA. • California Indian Tribal governments can join JPA's with legislative permission. • Governance responsibility for the JPA can be exclusive to electrical service provisions for the Coachella Valley service territory, or can be modified based on the desire of the members. • Offers the greatest amount of flexibility. The JPA structure is very flexible and allows members to define their own areas of authority and responsibilities pertaining to electrical service. • Allows services exclusive to Imperial County and the greater region (i.e. regional generation and transmission) to continue to be governed by the existing IID Board of Directors. • Board actions from the JPA can provide final approval and/or be coordinated with IID Board of Directors. • JPA can administer its own programs and incentives to align with local community interests. • No new legislation would be required and allows the JPA full right of predefining it power and rights. • A comprehensive debt policy should be established to define financial policies and principles to memorialize guiding directives from members of the JPA. • Management and ownership of electrical facilities and assets would remain under IID. • Provides flexible financing opportunities, either by IID rates and charges and/or JPA financing authority. • An Executive Director and/or additional staff could be required to administer the JPA. • A JPA has the authority to enter into a power supply agreement with IID, if the JPA desires to control generation services. • Accommodating additional growth and development can be improved depending on the financing policies imposed by IID and/or the JPA. • This option increases the amount of risk by potentially requiring debt and long-term financial obligations from acquiring property, assets, staffing, and/or administering a CIP under the JPA, for electrical services independent of IID. • Potential financial and/or operational impact to IID, and would be dependent based on the role and responsibility of the JPA. • Ability to utilize Local Bond Act to assist in the financing of public capital improvements. • Could potentially result in a financial impact to the CVWD and corresponding hydroelectric generation rights on the canal if they are non-member to the JPA. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS 9.3 OPTION 2: IID Terminates Electrical Service to the Coachella Valley Territory Under this option, the following alternative service and associated governance options are provided for stakeholder consideration. The reader can supplement the following section with details pertaining to each governance structure provided in Section 7. Service Alternative Option No, 2 - Imperial Irrigation District terminates electrical service provisions for the Coachella Valley service territory. Under this service option, the following alternative governance structures can be considered. 9.3.1 Alternative Governance Structures for Service Alternative Option No. 2 The following alternative governance structures aim to ensure proportional representation on a governing board that will have primary jurisdiction over all electrical service matters by extending voting rights to eligible voters residing within the Imperial Irrigation District electrical service area. This will establish proportional representation on a governing board that will have primary jurisdiction on all matters related to electrical service. These proposals distinctly separate water rights and management, ensuring that the current Imperial Irrigation District Board of Directors retains exclusive authority over them, and that the water service area boundaries shall remain unaffected GOVERNANCE OPTION 2.A - Dissolution and merger with an Investor -Owned Utility. Under this option the following should be considered: • Reorganization, proceedings, and/or special elections would be required. • Members could have the ability to secure a franchise fee in exchange for providing the IOU with the right to operate exclusively in their community. • Local control and representation would be limited with local advisement provided by engaging with the CPUC. • Would not allow eligible voters from Coachella Valley to participate in elections. • Coachella Valley stakeholders would not have direct governance control or obtain representation on electrical service provisions. • The IOU would acquire and purchase existing electrical infrastructure and assets. • Regulation and oversight would be provided by the CPUC. • Complex negotiations would be needed to transfer existing electrical assets. • Potential for higher rates depending on the IOU's generation sources and portfolio. • Funding provided by rates are set by the IOU and regulated by CPUC. • Uncertain if implementation of timely capital investments would be improved by the IOU and limited improvement with accommodating additional growth and development could be experienced. • Once IOU merger is complete, stakeholders would be eligible to form a CCA or similar. This would provide a small degree of local control and oversight for Coachella Valley stakeholders. • Could potentially minimize the amount of initial risk by deferring the management and ownership to the IOU. Long-term financial impacts are uncertain, with the potential to be greater than other alternative options under consideration. • Will impose a financial and operational impact on IID, and could ultimately cause IID to administer future rate increases despite a reduction in service responsibilities. GOVERNANCE OPTION 2.13 - Form a new Public Utility District, or Special District. Under this option the following should be considered: • Reorganization, proceedings, and/or special elections would be required. • Would create a new public utility to oversee and obtain responsibility over electrical service provisions for the entire Coachella Valley territory, ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS • The roles and responsibilities for the utility would be specific and based on the member's interest. • Coachella Valley stakeholders would have direct governance control and obtain representation on electrical service provisions for Coachella Valley, if desired by the newly formed utility. • The new utility, or Special District would have the ability to finance and own electrical facilities and assets. • Financing for capital improvements could be provided by the utilities electric rates, charges, and/or ability to secure bonds for public improvements. • This structure would require funding resources in order to acquire and purchase underlying electrical assets from IID, or others. The specific amount to acquire such assets is uncertain and would need to be negotiated. • This option offers the greatest amount of flexibility in defining the utilities service responsibilities, such as forming a partially integrated utility or vertically integrated. • Additional staffing and resources would be required to administer business functions and associated services, such as an Executive Director and/or technical staff. • The existing IID Board of Directors structure and governance would remain unaltered. • With local control and oversight, local officials can administer programs and incentives that align with community needs. • New legislation would not be required and existing legislation allows for flexibility in defining the utility's powers and rights. • Could impose a financial and operational impact to the existing IID Energy Division. • The utility can have the authority to execute a power supply agreement with IID, if the utility desires to control generation services. • A comprehensive debt policy should be established to define financial policies and principles to memorialize guiding directives from local officials. • This structure provides Coachella Valley with local oversight and could offer the greatest level of control over all, or specific areas of electrical service • Due to potential start-up costs, having the ability to provide a competitive and affordable service rate could be challenging for the utility. • Accommodating additional growth and development can be improved depending on the financing policies selected by the utility and its officials. • The ability to adapt to new legislation, state initiatives, and local priorities will be dependent on the utilities policies and available funding resources. • This structure will require an extensive number of staffing resources and technical expertise for start-up and ongoing operations. • A public vote and adoption by LAFCO would be required. • This option increases the amount of risk by potentially requiring debt and long-term financial obligations from acquiring property, assets, staffing, and/or administering a CIP under the new utility, for electrical services independent of IID. • Potential financial and/or operational impact on IID, and would be dependent based on the role and responsibility of the utility. • The service structure can also be combined with a JPA, with the members of the JPA being IID and the new utility. • Under this option, CVWD could also be named as the public entity and successor to continue service for the Coachella Valley. • Could result in a financial impact to the CVWD and corresponding hydroelectric generation rights on the canal if the new utility district desires oversight over generation services. Governance Option 2.C: Create a Vertically Integrated Public Utility District, or Special District for each stakeholder in the Coachella Valley service territory. Under this option the following should be considered: • Similar to option 23, but with expanded oversight and local governance over all aspects of electrical service, including; generation, transmission, distribution and administration. • Each stakeholder would create their own utility district to oversee and obtain responsibility over electrical service provisions for their service area. provisions. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS • Offers the greatest level of local control and oversight by Coachella Valley stakeholders. • Modifies the electrical service boundary for IID by removing the Coachella Valley service territory. • This option could have the potential challenge of being able to administer competitive and equitable rates due to start-up costs and required capital investments. • Under this option, CVWD could also be named as the public entity and successor to continue service for the Coachella Valley. • This structure would have the highest amount of risk from requiring the greatest amount of debt and long- term financial obligations associated with the need to acquire property, assets, staffing, and funding capital improvements for each utility. • Will impose a financial and/or operational impact to the IID Energy Division. • A comprehensive debt policy will need to be established to define financial policies and principles to memorialize guiding directives from public officials. • Will require complex legal negotiations and legislative challenges among the parties to potentially secure hydroelectric generation rights from CVWD. • Could result in a financial impact to CVWD and corresponding hydroelectric generation rights on the canal. Governance Option 2.11): Create a Community Choice Aggregation. Under this option the following should be considered: • For Coachella Valley stakeholders interested in forming a CCA, they must terminate all electrical service provisions from IID and merge with an IOU to be eligible to form the CCA. • The CCA can be operated under a JPA structure, or as a single jurisdiction. • The parties to the CCA must issue a Declaration to Pursue to the service area IOU and the CPUC. • No reorganization, proceedings or special elections are required. • The CCA would create a new public entity to oversee and assume responsibility over electrical generation and/or purchases. • All electrical facilities and assets would be managed and owned by others, not the CCA. • Financing programs for the CCA are potentially limited. • This structure would provide a limited amount of local control and oversight to Coachella Valley stakeholders, as this structure would depend on other utilities for transmission and distribution services. • Could require the need to retain additional staff, such as administration or operational managers, and technical. • The existing IID Board of Directors would remain. • No new legislation would be required. • The CCA would be supported and managed by its members, residents within its service boundary. • Uncertain if improvements can be achieved to accommodate additional growth and development, as this option is dependent on other utilities for providing transmission and distribution services. • Could minimize the amount of initial risk by deferring the management and ownership of transmission and distribution services to other utilities. Although, due to changing state regulations and initiatives, the long- term financial impact of forming a CCA is uncertain and could have the potential to be greater than other alternative options under consideration. • Would impose a financial and/or operational impact to the IID Energy Division. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS 9.4 Alternative Options Support Foundation Objectives to Varying Degrees While each alternative service option achieves different outcomes, each stakeholder can review performance under varying subsets of foundational objectives, The resulting variability in the assessment of alternative option performance could potentially result in conflicting opinions. Therefore, it is critical for stakeholders in the Coachella Valley to identify the foundational objectives that are common and core, regardless of the alternative option under consideration. To address this issue, the following analysis was conducted to provide stakeholders and policymakers with a general indication of the alternative option that might best address their needs, It is worth noting that the findings of this analysis will need to be aligned with the desired level of responsibility that each stakeholder is willing to commit to providing electrical service provisions for the Coachella Valley service territory. For instance, local representation can be provided under a variety of alternative options, but the degree of representation would be limited to the level of control of the proposed utility, or alternative ownership structure other than IID. Evaluating future alternative options based on these two critical elements will be crucial in identifying the best -fit alternative option for both of the electrical service territories. The alternative options evaluation matrix is presented in Figure 9-1 and provides an overview of how each of the proposed alternative options supports the foundational objectives. The foundational objectives were derived from stakeholder feedback and used as a way to evaluate the performance of each alternative option against status quo. To supplement this analysis and the overall effort, in April 2021, the American Public Power Association (APPA) conducted a Governance Survey to present information on the type of governing bodies responsible for overseeing public power systems, The survey findings are summarized in Tables 9-1 and 9-2 and revealed that the type of governing body in charge of public power systems was evenly divided, with 54% of respondents indicating that the electrical system is governed by a City Council and the remaining 46% by an independent utility board. This was based on 295 responses, with 18 of those being completed by utilities with more than 50,000 customers. A summary of the survey results are provided below and additional information can be found at the APPA website (https://www.publicpower.org/resource/public-power- governance-survey), This information serves as a valuable reference point for gaining insight into the current governance structures of Public Utilities and can further supplement the information presented in this Study, Depending on the decisions made by the Coachella Valley stakeholders, the following survey results are presented by the number of customers served. It should be noted that the governance structure and roles vary by the number of customers served. Depending on the outcome of IID and/or the parties within the Coachella Valley, the following survey results by customers count appear to align with the estimated number of customers to be served by the alternative service or governance options under consideration. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS TABLE 9-1 - AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION GOVERNANCE SURVEY., TYPE OF GOVERNING BODY Primary Governing Body Less than 5,000 144 7% 26% 67% 5,000 to 20,000 94 20% 41 % 38% 20,000 to 50,000 34 9% 41 % 50% More than 50,000 17 18% 53% 29% .. ,. ,. Notes; I. April 2021 survey results from the American Public Power Association - Public Power Governance Survey ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS TABLE 9-2 — AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION GOVERNANCE SURVEY: AUTHORITY OF GOVERNING BODY Authorities Independent Utility City Council the Board Less than 5,000 Connections Set retail electric rates 85% 4% 11 % Approve Utility Budgets 85% 11 % 4% Issue Bonds 61 % 28% 11 % Set Financial Policies 87% 7% 6% Approve Power Purchase Contracts 74% 20% 6% 5,000 to 20,000 Connections Set retail electric rates 69% 14% 17% Approve Utility Budgets 78% 11 % 11 % Issue Bonds 46% 46% 8% Set Financial Policies 74% 9% 17% Approve Power Purchase Contracts 000 to 50,000 Connections Set retail electric rates 80% 69% 5% 25% 15% 6% Approve Utility Budgets 87% 13% 0% Issue Bonds 44% 38% 18% Set Financial Policies 100% 0% 0% Approve Power Purchase Contracts More than 50,000 Connections Set retail electric rates 94% 62% 6% 38% 0% 0% Approve Utility Budgets 69% 31 % 0% Issue Bonds 38% 38% 24% Set Financial Policies 69% 8% 23% Approve Power Purchase Contracts 77% 8% 15% Notes: 1. April 2021 survey results from the American Public Power Association - Public Power Governance Survey 2. The term 'other" includes structures where there is a Joint Powers Authority with the underlying independent utility or City Council. ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS FIGURE 9-1: ALTERNATIVE GOVERNANCE EVALUATION MATRIX (TABLE LOCATED ON NEXT PAGE) FIGURE 9-1: ALTERNATIVE GOVERNANCE EVALUATION MATRIX Foundational Objectives Service Alternative Option No. t - IID continues to provide electrical service to Coachella Valley Service Alternative Option No. 2 - IID terminates electrical service to Coachella Valley Option 1A: Status Option 1.B: Annex Coachella Valley Option I.C: Sub -Board of Directors for Option S.D: Create a Joint Powers Option 2.A: Merge to Investor -Owned Option 2.B: Form a new Public Utility Option 2.C: Form Vertically Integrated Option 2.D: Form a Community Choice Objective Addressed Quo into III) III) AuthorityUtility ty District Public Utility District ty Aggregation Potential to Address Objective Pending Role of the Proposed Utility New Public Utility District jar Coachella CCA to provide electrical generation ' Objective Note Addressed Maintain status quo with no service or Annex Coachella Volley Service Territory Create llDSub-BoardofDirectorsfor Form a Joint Power Agreement or Dissolution and merger with an Investor- Volley electrical service provisions. New Vertically Integrated Public Utility and/or power purchases. Utility will be governance changes, to IID and adjust IID jurisdictional Coachella Valley electrical service Agency with Coachella Valley Owned Utility. Roles to 6e specific based on Districts for Coachella Valley electrical dependent other utilities far boundary. provisionn. Stakeholders and IID. stakeholder desires, such as distribution service provisions. d transmission and distribution services. only. Services Provided by a Public and Locally Controlled Entity Ability for all eligible, registered voters within the Coachella Valley electrical service territory to be an appointed or elected official for purposes of providing oversight and supervising activities of the underlying electrical service entity. u Provides Representation for Coachella Valley Customers Provides each appointed or elected official local oversight, supervision, and control of all functions of service (including assets) owned and managed by the proposed utility. Maintain an Advisory Role for Non -Responsible Electrical Service Provisions Ability to provide impartial third -party advice to the I I D Board of Directors on electrical service provisions which are not the responsibility of the newly formed entity. Ownership Structure Must Provide Flexible Financing Opportunities Ability to impose rate increases, secure external funding, issue municipal bonds, or form a financing authority to support a improvement initial for facilities. capital program and/or costs acquiring existing electrical Structure that Can Own Electrical Assets Alternative service option provides the ability to acquire and own underlying electrical assets for electrical generation, transmission, distribution 0 and/or services. Provides Coachella Valley with Oversight of Financial Policies Provides oversight and supervision of financial policies, rates, and charges for electrical services. To endorse polices that administer equitable rates structured to support economic growth and ability to recover cost of service. Oversight of Capital Planning to Support Economic Development Permits local oversight of capital improvement planning and implementation. Supporting timely planning and capital 0 • . • O . investments to accommodate growth and development. Structure Easy to Implement Structure should require a limited amount of coordination to implement the proposed service and/or governance structure, • O O • O O including legal, financial, and legislative complexity as compared to status quo. Ability to Expand Public Benefits Provides oversight and supervision of customer programs and incentives. To endorse policies that support state initiatives O • • . O • - and local community interests. Achieve Industry Maintenance Standards Provides oversight of operational and maintenance services. To support business practices that promote efficient and • • • O • • reliable service by endorsing policies that achieve industry standards for preventative maintenance and service. Use of Efficient Public Resources Structure should leverage existing resources to help minimize the need to recreate established policies and the need for • • • • • • additional public resources. Promote Local Renewable Energy Programs Oversight and supervision of renewable energy opportunities and local generation programs; including solar, wind, geothermal and other eligible resources. Supporting partnerships with regional partners interested in local renewable' generation. Ability to Achieve Vertically Integrated Utility Status Structure that could allow for the complete oversight and governance of all electrical service provisions associated with 0 0 4011 0 generation, transmission, and distribution. �1 Ability to Adapt to Future Changes and Responsibilities Structure that can be modified to align with future changes in the members roles and responsibilities of utility ownership O 0 0 and/or governance. Minimizes Risk to Rate Payers Structure that has the potential to reduce or limit the amount of legal and/or financial risk to the members and community it 0 serves regarding start-up, implementation, and ongoing operational costs. Provides Local Control for Distribution Assets Oversight and supervision of capital planning, upgrades, and expansions related to local distribution facilities. ! k__J 0 Maximize Public Involvement Structure that will endorse public policies to promote engagement and collaboration with the local community to obtain public input throughout the entire decision -making process. 155 ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE OPTIONS 9.5 Suggested Actions Prior to the Expiration of the Agreement of Compromise This section provides suggested actions to help assist with addressing outstanding questions regarding the existing and continued electrical service to the Coachella Valley. Coachella Valley stakeholders and IID can consider the following actions to support the ongoing collaboration toward developing a community -based solution for electrical service and governance for the Coachella Valley. The following considerations can be used to establish near -term priorities and help assist with addressing technical feasibility, legal requirements, and financial policies for the alternative service and governance options under consideration, Based on the CVEC 2021-22 Annual Report many of the following actions are identified as the near and long-term priorities of the Commission, The following are suggested actions the parties can consider to assist with ongoing efforts associated with alternative service and governance options; • The parties should acknowledge that the CVEC is likely the most effective entity at this time to assist through the details of determining a preferable solution and/or alternative option. The Study can aid ongoing discussion and engagements among the parties, which includes representation from majority of Coachella Valley customers. • Stakeholders to establish desired rights, roles, and responsibilities for electrical service and governance. The guiding polices and principles should also examine if it will be desired to own electrical facilities, or secure service agreements with IID, or others. • Develop policy principles that can provide a consistent basis for evaluating issues, making decisions, and setting policy. • Perform technical feasibility studies to determine if the proposed entity is financially feasible, conducting valuations to estimate the value of associated electrical facilities and resources. • Evaluate alternative financing mechanisms to support new growth and development, including rate and fee structures for enhancing service reliability for status quo, or for the alternative service and governance options under consideration. • Continue to expand public engagement as the stakeholders advance discussions on potential alternative service and governance options. APPENDICES APPENDIX A: ASSEMBLY BILL 1021 157 ASSEMBLY BILL ENROLLED SEPTEMBER 07, 2021 PASSED IN SENATE SEPTEMBER 01, 2021 PASSED IN ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 02, 2021 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 19, 2021 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 16, 2021 AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 01, 2021 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 24, 2021 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 19, 2021 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 18, 2021 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2021-2022 REGULAR SESSION Introduced by Assembly Member Mayes February 18, 2021 NO. 1021 An act to add Section 56378.2 to the Government Code, relating to irrigation districts, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1021, Mayes. Imperial Irrigation District. (1) The Cortese -Knox -Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 provides the authority and procedure for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization, reorganization, and sphere of influence changes for cities and districts, as specified. Under the act, each local agency formation commission is required to initiate and make studies of existing governmental agencies, including, but not limited to, studies to determine each local agency's maximum service area and service capacities. This bill would require the local agency formation commissions for the County of Imperial and the County of Riverside to conduct and publish on their internet websites a joint study of options for providing continued publicly owned and managed electrical service in perpetuity to the Imperial Irrigation District's electrical service area, as defined, customers and options for alternative governance structures that would extend voting rights to registered voters who reside within the Imperial Irrigation District electrical service area to provide for proportional representation on a governing board that will have primary jurisdiction on all electrical service matters, as specified. The bill would require the study to be published no later than July 1, 2022. By imposing new duties on the specified local agency formation commissions, the bill would impose a state -mandated local program. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Imperial Irrigation District. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. 158 This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Digest Key Vote: 2/3 Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes Bill Text THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 56378.2 is added to the Government Code, to read: 56378.2. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, the commissions for the County of Imperial and the County of Riverside shall conduct and publish on their internet websites a joint study of both of the following: (1) Options for providing continued publicly owned and managed electrical service in perpetuity to Imperial Irrigation District electrical service area customers prior to, and after, the expiration of the 99-year lease for power rights made between the Imperial Irrigation District and the Coachella Valley Water District in 1934. (2) Options for alternative governance structures that would extend voting rights to registered voters who reside within the Imperial Irrigation District electrical service area to provide for proportional representation on a governing board that will have primary jurisdiction on all electrical service matters. Any findings shall isolate water rights and management as the sole responsibility of the current Imperial Irrigation District board of directors and shall not affect the water service area boundaries of the Imperial Irrigation District. (b) The joint study described in subdivision (a) shall be published no later than July 1, 2022. (c) For the purposes of this section, "electrical service area" means the area where the district provides retail electrical service that is outside of the district's boundaries. SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the conditions unique to the Counties of Imperial and Riverside and the Imperial Irrigation District. SEC. 3. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. SEC. 4. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: Due to the extreme conditions the state is facing regarding energy, it is necessary for the Imperial Irrigation District to address these issues affecting customers within their service area as soon as possible. 159 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BILL ANALYSIS AMENDMENT DATE: 08/16/2021 BILL NUMBER: AB 1021 POSITION: Oppose AUTHOR: Mayes, Chad BILL SUMMARY: Imperial Irrigation District. This bill requires the local agency formation commissions (LAFCOs) for Imperial County and Riverside County to conduct a joint study of options for providing electricity in the Imperial Irrigation District (District) and other affected service areas, and options for alternative governance structures that provide for proportional representation for the District's board of directors, as specified. The bill also requires the study be published on the LAFCOs' internet websites no later than July 1, 2022. Further, this bill increases the membership of the District's board of directors from five to six. This bill requires a two-thirds vote to take effect immediately as an urgency statue. FISCAL SUMMARY Finance anticipates that this bill's requirement for the two LAFCOs to complete a joint study would not create a state -reimbursable mandate. LAFCOs are not eligible to file claims for reimbursement of mandated costs, because they do not have taxing authority. Only those local agencies subject to taxing and spending limitations are eligible to file a claim. However, Finance anticipates this bill may create a state -reimbursable mandate by requiring the District to add a member to its board of directors, because this may represent a higher level of service to the public. The costs would include salary and benefits, access to technology, and other items. Based on publicly available 2019 pay data for the District, the salary for each board member is about $50,000. CHANGES SUMMARY This bill was amended on August 16, 2021 and includes the following significant amendments, which do not change Finance's position: • Specifies the joint study must include options to provide continued publicly owned and managed electrical service in perpetuity to the District's electrical service area. • Specifies the joint study's options for alternative governance structures must extend voting rights to registered voters who reside within the District's electrical service area. • Requires the District's governing board to increase to six members on January 1, 2023, and specifies the added member will be a nonvoting director solely for electrical issues presented before the board. • Requires the General Counsel of the District to determine which issues before the board are electrical issues and permits the nonvoting director to request a written rationale from the Analyst/Principal Date Program Budget Manager Date (712) Hill, Chris Calvert, Teresa Department Deputy Director Date Governor's Office: By: Date: Position Approved Position Disapproved BILL ANALYSIS Form DF-43 (Rev 03/95 Buff) ETHLL : AB 1021 - 08/19/2021 10:04 AM (2) BILL ANALYSIS-JCONTINUED) Form DF-43 AUTHOR AMENDMENT DATE BILL NUMBER Mayes, Chad 08/16/2021 AB 1021 CHANGES SUMMARY (continued) General Counsel when it determines the issue before the board is not an electrical issue. Specifies that if the District no longer serves electricity to 60 percent or more of its existing customers within the electrical service area before or on December 31, 2032, the nonvoting director's membership will terminate. COMMENTS Finance is opposed to this bill because it may create a state -reimbursable mandate of at least $50,000 per year. LAFCOs are quasi-judicial countywide commissions that oversee boundary changes of cities and special districts, the formation of new agencies including the incorporation of new cities and districts, and the consolidation or reorganization of special districts and cities. LAFCOs are funded by the cities, counties, and, special districts within each commission's jurisdiction. The District supplies water and energy service to customers in Imperial County and Riverside County. The rights to provide electric service were granted to the District as part of a 99-year agreement reached between the District and the Coachella Valley Water District in 1934; the agreement expires in 2033. The Riverside County residents that receive electricity from the District have never been fully annexed into IID's boundaries, and as a result do not have the ability to vote for their representatives on the board of directors. This bill requires the LAFCOs for Imperial County and Riverside County to conduct a joint study that must include options for providing electricity in the District's jurisdiction and other affected service areas, in the circumstance that the District desires to no longer provide electrical service in its jurisdiction. The bill also requires development of options for alternative governance structures that provide for proportional representation for the District's board of directors. The bill requires the study to be published on the LAFCOs' internet websites no later than July 1, 2022. This bill increases the membership of the District's board of directors from five to six and specifies the added director will be a non -voting director, with all of the other rights of existing directors. The bill also provides that if the District no longer serves electricity to 60 percent or more of its existing electric customers within the electrical service area before or on December 31, 2032, the non -voting director's membership will terminate and the board membership will decrease from six to five members. SO (Fiscal Impact by Fiscal Year) Code/Department LA (Dollars in Thousands) Agency or Revenue CO PROP Fund Type RV 98 FC 2021-2022 FC 2022-2023 FC 2023-2024 Code 8885/Comm St Mndt LA No C 50-75 C 50-75 C 50-75 0001 161 APPENDICES APPENDIX B: 1934 AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE 162 AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE BETWEEN IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Dated February 14, 1934 AGREEMEW OF COMPROITISE BETV M IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIMICT AND COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Sec. 1, THIS AGRMORs Made the 14th day of February, 1934, by and between IMpMIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, an irrip_,atibn district organized and existing under and by virtue of the California Irrigation District Act of the State of California and acts emendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, with its principal office at El Centro, Imperial County, California, said District being hereinafter sometimes styled "Imperial District", and COACHELL& VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a County Water District organized and existing under and by virtue of the County water Dis- trict Act of the State of California and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, and having its office at Coachella, Riverside County, California, said Disc trict being hereinafter sometimes styled "Coachella District", WITNESSETH: RECITALS. Soo. 2. THAT, t'MMW, pursuant to the terms of the Boulder Canyon Project Act, approved Decembor 219 192a (45 Stat • 1057) , tho Secretary of the Interior is author- ized to construct a main canal and appurtenant structures locatod entirely within the United Statos, connecting Laguna Dam or other suitable diversion dam, which said Secretary is authorized to construct, with Imperial find- Coachella Valleys in California; and Sec. 3. WHCREAS, Tho Secretary of the Intoriox has dotorminod upon engineering and economic considorations to construct a naw diversion dam on the Colorado River I. approxt-natloy four and once -half miles above Laguna Dams which now diversion dum has -1- 164 horotoforo boon and is designated Imperial Dam; and Soc. 4. WHMEAS, Pursuant to the Boulder Canyon Project Act, a contract, dated Decembor 1, 1932, horeinaftor stylod "Imperial Contractits has heretofore boon oao- cutod between the United States and Imperial District for the construction of said Imperial Dam, main canal and appurtenant structures, which said main canal tnd appur- tenant structures are horoinaftor styled "All -American Canal", and for the ro- payment of the cost thereof as provided by law; and Soc. 5. WfMZOj By said Imperial Contract$ cortain lands in Coachella Valley, and within Coachella District and l-xnds nd jacont to said District may, by petition, be included within the boundaries of Imperial District, and if said lands are not so included, thon tho works and capacity to serve said lands shall not be constructed under said contract; and Sec. 6. W%iEEMS, .Said Coachella District through its Board of Directors has dotormined that said lands will not become a part of Imperial District pursuant -to said contract, and that.Coacholla District dosiros to obtain a contract, hereinafter styled "Coachella Contract", with the United States, sopnrately from Imperial' Dis- trict, for capacity in said Imperial Dam and All Amorican Canna to be provided for the benefit of said Coachell�n District, in addition to the capnoity therein provided for Imperial District, and to pay the proper cost of such capacity; and Soc. 7. IVIMEA,S, Under date of August 18, 1931, an r-grooment was mado between certain interested agencies in California, including the parties to this agreement, for the apportionment of the Colorado River wator available for use within the State of California under the Colorado River Comp�xct and tno ,Boulder Canyon Project Act, a portion of which agreement is, sot out in Article 17 of said Imperial Contract as being a rocommondation of the Chief of tho ,Division of Vlater Rosoureos Of the State of C nlif ornia; and -2 - 165 Sec. 6. WHEREAS, Water for irrigation and domestic uses in the areas to be served under or'from the All -American Canal in Imperial and Coachella Valleys will be supplied pursuant to the third and sixth priorities of said recommendation of the Chief of .the Division of Water Resources of the State of California; and Sec. 9. 10MEREAS, Imperial District has certain prior rights to the use of the waters of the Colorado River, and the extent of said rights is in dispute as between the parties hereto, and each of said parties makes certain claims as to the use of said waters; and Sec'. 10. WHEREAS, The parties hereto, upon their respective contracts with the United States becoming effective and said All -American Canal being constructed, will respectively have certain power possibilities on the All -American Canal, which it is desired to have developed, operated and controlled as a unified project; and' Sec.`ll. WHEREAS, Controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties hereto as to the extent and relation of their respective present and future rights to water and power on and from said All -American Canals which controversy it is desired to have compromised and settled by this agreement; NOVA, THEREFORE, In consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations and convenants of the parties hereto and as a compromise and settlement of their said respective rights, privileges and claims respecting the matters herein contained] it is agreed: Sec. 12. GaCHELLA CONTRACT Coachella District will forthwith apply to the proper governmental authorities for a contract between itself and the United,States for the construction by the United States of the portion of the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal which will serve said Districts and for the payment of'its proper proportion of constructim and other costs and for delivery of water; said contract to be in harmony with the provisions of the Imperial Contract and this agreement, The draft of said proposed Cnachella Contract attached hereto and mFarkcd "Annex All has been examined by . 3- .v Imperial District and the substance of said draft is approved by the parties hereto. Imperial District agrees that said draft, ��r such other draft as may be acceptable to the United States and in harm-)ny with the provisions of the Imperial, Contract and of this agreement, may be executed between the Coacholla District and the United States. Inporial District will actively assist 06acholla District in obtaining exacution )f such contract by the United Status. VALIDATION ACTION see. 13. That forthwith upon the execution of this agreement Coachella Dis- trict will cause to be dismissed on behalf of itself and A• B. Cliff, 'John H. Colbertf R. Co. EGnew, J. Co Jones and Washington McIntyre, with the stipulation that remit- titure issue forthwith and that each party pay his or its own costs, their appeal now pending in the Supreme Court of California, in that certain action entitled; "In the Matter of the validation of a Contract Dated Dec. 1, 1932, Entitled 'Contract for Construction of Diversion Dam, Main Canal and Appurtenant Structures, and for Delivery of Water, between the United States of America and Imperial Irrigation District. John L. Dubois, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, vs. All Persons, Defendants; Coachella Valley County Water District et al., Defendants and Appellants", being L.A. No. 14487, and this agreement shall not become effective for any purpose unless and until said appeal is so dismissed on behalf of all of said parties within ten (10) days from the execution hereof. Coachella District will actively assist in bringing said action to an early and final conclusion to the end that the present Judgment be sustained. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec, 14. The provisions of this agreement hereinafter set forth'shall be effec- tive and binding upon the parties hereto only in the event that the Coachella con- tract above mentioned is executed by and between the United States and said Coachella District prior to the transfer of constructed Frorks to Imperial District -4- 167 for operation and maintenance, as provided by said Imperial Contract, and such Coachella Contract prior to such transfer or thereafter becomes binding upon the parties therto, pursuant to law. After this agreement becomes effective, it, to- gether with the lease herein provided fors,shall terminate in the event Coachella District shall be relieved of ail obligations under the Coachella Contract, by reason of failure of the United States to complete the'worka to be constructed thereunder. WATER Sec. 15. As a full and complete compromise and settlement of the controversy existing between the parties hereto as to the extent and priority of their respective rights and claims to the use of the waters of the Colorado River, it is agreed, as between said parties, that: Imperial Irrigation District shall have the prior right for irrigation and pota- ble purposes only, and exclusively for use in the imperial Service Area, as herein- after defined, or hereunder modified, to all waters apportioned to said Imperial Irrigation District and other lands under or that will be served from the All - American Canal in Imperial and Coachella Valleys as provided in the third and sixth priorities set out in the recommendation of the Chief of the Division of Water Re- sources of the State of California, as contained in Article 17 of the Imperial Con- tract. Subject to said prior right of Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District shall have the next right, for irrigation and potable purposes only and exclusively for -use in the Coachella Service Areas as hereinafter defined, or hereunder modifieds to all waters so apportioned to said Imperial Irrigation Dis- trict and other lands under or that will be served from the All -American Canal in the Imperial and Coachella Valleys, as provided in said third and sixth priorities. The use_ of water for generation of electric energy shall be, in All respects, secondary and subservient to all requireihents of said two districtsfor irrigation and potable pu'Aoses As iibove limited, 168 As hereinabove used, the term "Imperial Service Area" shall comprise all lands within the boundaries of Imperial Irrigation District as said District was consti- tuted on June 23, 1931, and all lands in Imperial and San Diego Counties, Californian shown on map marked Exhibit "A", attached to said Imperial contract, and included within hatched border lines indicated on said map by legend as "Boundary of Addition- al Areas in Proposed Enlarged Imperial Irrigation District", other than (a) such of said lands as are labeled "Dos Palmas Area" and (b) such of said lands as lie West of Salton Sea and North of the Northerly boundary line of Township 11, South of the San Bernardino Base Line. The term "Coachella Service Area" shall comprise all lands described on statements hereto attached and marked "Exhibits" "B", "CII, I'D" and "Ell, respectively, being approximately but not exactlyo the lands within said hatched border lines shown on said Exhibit "A", other than those included in said Imperial Service Area. Upon application of either district and with the written consent of the Secretary of the Interior, the boundaries of the service area which such district is entitled hereunder to serve may at any time or from time to time be changed,'but may not be so changed as, in the aggregate, to add more than 5000 acres to, nor to subtract more than 5000 acres from such service'areao as herein defined without the written consent of the district entitled hereunder to serve the other service area. Coachella District shall not participate in any revenues received by Imperial Dis- trict for diverting, carrying and delivering at or near Pilot Knobs water for irri- gation or domestic use for any person 'or agency other than the parties heretos and Coachella District shall perform no such service at or near Pilot Knob, APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE WATER Sec. 166 The parties hereto agree .that their.respective applications to appro- priate water from the Colorado River for irrigation and domestic purposes heretofore filed with the Division of Water Resources of the State of California be deemed amended to conform with the foregoing provisions of this agreement and stipulate 10 169 that permits -be lasucd to them, respectively, in accordance herewith and agree to f i],e with said Division all necessary papers and stipulations to that end. Except as between the parties hereto the provisions of this agreement shall not affect nor impair any rights of either party to the waters of the Colorado River. LEASE CR POWER RIGHTS Sec. 17. As a compromise and settlement of the controversy existing between the parties hereto as to all power possibilities, power rights, power resources and power privileges upon the whole of said All -American Canal in both Imperial and Riverside Counties, now or hereafter held, owned, or possessed by said parties, or either.of them, including all those at or near Pilot Knob, which said power possibilities, power rights', power resources and power privileges are hereinafter styled 11power rights", and to combine and co-ordinate all of said power rights as a unified project so as to produce the maximum benefits to the parties hereto and to the United States it is agreed that the parties hereto will, within a reasonable time after the ex- ecution of said Coachella Contract, execute a good and sufficient lease agreement, wherein Coachella District shall demise to Imperial District all of said power rights which the Coachella District may now have or hereafter obtain. Said lease, among other reasonable provisions, shaal provide: (a) That the term of said lease shall commence with the date thereof and ter- minate on January 1, 2033; provided, that should the term herein or in said lease fixed exceed that permitted by law at the date of said lease, then said term shall be deemed reduced to the longest period permitted by law; (b) That said lease shall vest in Imperial. District the entire and exclusive operation, management, development and control of all said power rights and the use, sale and control of power produced therefrom; -7- 170 (c) That subject to the conditions hereinafter contained, Imperial District shall pay, on March first of each year, as rental for said demised power rights, eight per cent of the net proceeds, as defined in sub -section (f) hereofp received by Imperial District during the preceding calendar year from all said power rights held, owned or possessed by both parties hereto and from all power works and power facilities by or in connection with which Imperial District utilizes said power rights; (d) That said rentals shall be paid by Imperial District to the United States and credited on the Coachella Contract until Coachella Distrietts obligations to the United States under said contract are fully paid, and thereafter Imperial District - shall pay said rentals to Coachella District; (e) That no rentals shall be due or payable unless and until capacity in the All -American Canal shall have been provided for Coachella District down to Pilot -Knob; (f) That in determining said net proceeds, as between the parties hereto, there shall be taken into consideration all items of cost of production and disposal of power, including, but not necessarily limited to amortization of and interest on capital investment for power purposes, improvements, operation and maintenance, and depreciation, and any other proper factor of cost not herein expressly enumerated; (g) That the determination of said net proceeds for the purpose of ascertaining rentals payable under said lease shall be made without reference to the fact that as to Imperial District said rentals will constitute a part of the cost of doing businegs; (h) That on March first of each year Imperial District shall furnish to Coachella District a statement of account showing the computation of said rental; (i) That Coachella District shall not be required to contribute in any manner to the cost of constructiono operation or maintenance of any power works or facil- ities on or in connection with the All -American Canalp except indirectly, as said 171 items may be taken into consideration in determing rentals to be paid under said lease; (j) That said lease shall terminate upon Coachella District being relieved of obligations as provided in Section lk hereof and/or at the option of Coachella Dis- trict, in the event of default in any payment of rentals by Imperial District for a period of two years; (k) That any overdue rental shall bear interest at the rate of one-half of one per cent per month until paid; (1) That when Imperial District is ready to undertake construction of facilities to,serve electrical energy (herein designed "power") in Coachella Valley, Coachella District shall obtain for Imperial District signed contracts or applications for power as provided in Section 18 hereof, and be otherwise subject to the provisions of said Section 18; (m) That when Imperial District is ready to serve power from the All -American -Canal in Coachella Valley, then, if and while said lease is in effect, Imperial Dis- trict will furnish such power in Coachella District at the rates and upon the con- ditions provided in Section 19 hereof; (n) That Coachella District shall, by its officials or designated represent- atives, have the right of ingress to and egress from all power works and facilities of Imperial District for the -purpose of inspection thereof, and full and free access to and the right during office hours to inspect and copy all books and records of Imperial District relating to its power operations; (o) That the interest of Imperial District under said lease shall not,nor shall any part thereof nor interest therein, be assigned, nor shall Imperial District sub- let any part of nor interest .in said demised power rights without the written consent of Coachella District; (P) That at the termination of said lease the rights and privileges -of the _9- 172 parties thereto shall be segregated and/or adjusted as may be equitable and just, having in view the business, interests and investments of the parties and their re- pective legal and equitable rights in said power rights, works and facilities on or in connection with the All -American Canal; (q) That in the event the parties cannot agree upon such segregation or adjust- ment, then the same shall be made by a board of arbitration, consisting of five per- sons, one to be selected by Imperial District, one by Coachella District, and three by the Secretary of the Interior and the decision of said board of arbitration shall be final and binding upon the parties to said lease; (r) That nothing contained in said lease shall be construed as in any manner abridging, limiting, or depriving either of the parties thereto of any means of en- forcing any remedy,,either at law or in equity, for the breach of any of the pro- visions of said lease which it would otherwise have; (s) That the waiver of a breach of any of the provisions of said lease shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision thereof or of a subsequent breach of such provision. POWER CONTRACTS Sec. 18. When the lease provided for in Section 17 hereof has been executed and Imperial District is ready to undertake construction of facilities to.serve electrical energy, (herein styled "power") in Coachella Valley it shall notify .Coachella District of said fact in writing and it shall thereupon be the duty of Coachella District to obtain for Imperial District, within six months after service of such notice, contracts or applications for power signed by consumers using at the time of service of such notice not less than eighty per cent of the power load then being consumed in the Coachella Service Area. Such contracts or applications shall be in such form and substance as reasonably required by Imperial District and shall among other things bind the consumer to take from Imperial District all power that 173 he may require in Coachella District for a period of three years. In the event of disagreement between the parties as to whether or not Coachella District has complied with the foregoing provisions of this sectirn on its part to be complied with, then the Secretary of the Interior may, at the written request of either party, determine said fact and notify the parties hereto of such determination in writing, and such determination shall be final and binding upon the parties hereto. Notwithstanding anything herein or in said lease contained, there shall be no obligation on the part of the Imperial District for rentals under said lease during the time, if any, after said six months period that said signed contracts or applications for said eighty per- cent of power load have not been so delivered. POWER RATES Sec. 19. 'When the lease provided for in Section 17 hereof has been executed and Imperial District is ready to servo power from the All -American Canal in Coachella Valley then, and while said lease remains in effect, Imperial District will furnish such power in Coachella District upon the. following terms A. To Coachella District, for use by itself for project purposes within said Coachella Service Area as such project purposes are hereinafter defined, at rates in no case exceeding the cost of power delivered in Coachella Valley, plus fifteen per cent, and in no event at rates higher than are charged by Imperial District to itself for like uses with such additional charges as may be necessary to offset difference in costs of transmitting power as between Imperial and Coachella Valleys. Subject to the foregoing provisions, Coachella District agrees that, for a period of five years from and after the service of the notice provided for in -Section 18 hereof said Coachella District will purchase from Imperial District and pay for all power Coachella District may require for project purposes within the Coachella Service Area, and for which Imperial District has sufficient f4cilities and is prepared to serve. Imperial District shall not be required to furnish poorer to Coachella District for -11- 174 project purposes at points where Imperial District does not then have sufficient facilities for such power service. IlProject Purposes" as used in this section shall be understood to mean con- struct -ion, operation and maintenance of Coachella District's irrigation and drainage system within the Coachella Service Area, where such construction, operation, or maintenance is of a general public nature and not individual or private in character. B. To all consumers within Coachella District, other than to Coachella District, for project purposes, at no higher rates than those charged, and under the same con- ditions and regulations as those prescribed, by imperial District for like service to consumers within Imperial District with such additional charges as may be necessary to offset difference in costs of transmitting power as between Imperial and Coachella Valleys. In no event shall such rates to such consumers exceed seventy-five per cent of the rates paid for like service by individual consumers in Coachella District on January 1, 1934, based upon the purchasing power of the dollar on said date. Imperial District shall make such further reduction in rates to such consumers as may be necessary to meet competitive rates for like service of any public utility, at the time authorized by the Railroad Commission of the State of California, or other authority succeeding to its functions, and able to serve such consumers, but in no $vent shall Imperial District be required to charge rates that will return less than the cost of service. POWER PERMITS Sec. 20. The parties hereto agree to cooperate to the end that all necessary and proper permits and licenses to appropriate water for power purposes and con- struct power facilities may be obtained from the Division of Water Resources of the State of California and/or Federal Power Commission as may be authorized by law and hereby stipulate that such permits and licenses issue to the parties hereto, as follows, to -wits -12- 175 1. To Imperial District, as to all such permits and licenses on the portion of the All -American Canal shown on said Exhibit "All and marked "Main (All American) Canal to Imperial Valley" lying west of the southerly end of the "Main (All American) Canal to Coachella Valleys+ as same is shown on said Exhibit "A"; 2. To Coachella District, as to all such permits and licenses on the portion of the All -American Canal shown on said Exhibit I'An and marked I'Main (All American) Canal to Coachella Valley" lying North of the Northerly boundary line of Township llf South of the San Bernardino Base Line; 3, To Imperial District and Coachella District, as their respec- tive privileges to utilize power possibilities may appear from their said contracts with the United States, as to all such privileges on all portions of the Imperial Dam and All - American Canal, including Pilot Knob, not hereinabove spedified. AGREEsENT VOID IF CERTAIN LANDS INCLUDED IN IMPERIAL DISTRICT Sec. 21. In the event lawful petition or petitions sufficient in all respects for inclusion within Imperial District of ninety per cent (90%) of the lands shown on said Exhibit "A" lying north of the northerly boundary line of Township Eleven (11 4 South of the San Bernardino Base Line and bounded by the lines indicated on said Exhibit "A" as "Boundary of Additional Areas in Proposed Enlarged Imperial Irrigation District", exclusive of the Dos Palmas Area and exclusive of Indian lands and public lands of the United States, shall be filed pursuant to and within the tiW limited by said Imperial Contract, and said lands shall be thereafter included -13- 176 within said Imperial District pursuant to such petition or petitions, then, as of the date of such inclusion, this agreement shall terminate and be at an end. REMEDIES UNDER AGREEMENT NOT EXCLUSIVE Sec. 22. Nothing contained in this agreement shall be construed as in any manner abridging, limiting, or depriving either of the parties hereto of any means of enforcing any remedy, either at law or in equity, for the breach of any of the pro- visions hereof which it would otherwise have. The waiver of a breach of any of the, provisions of this agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other pro- vision hereof or of a subsequent breach of such provision. Seco 23. This agreement shall not be interpreted nor construed so as to amend, modify or change said Imperial Contract in any particular, and no provision hereof in conflict with said Imperial Contract shall be of any force or effect. As to any provisions hereof in which the United States is interested this agreement shall be deemed to be made expressly for the benefit of the United States, as well as of the parties hereto. Sec. 24. This agreement shall inure to and be binding upon the parties hereto, their and.each of their -respective -successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Said parties have -executed this agreement in triplicate original by their respective officers, thereunto duly authorized by resolutions of their respective Boards of Directors, the day and year first above written. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (SEAL) BY Evan T, Hewes (Signed) Its President, ATTEST: W. W. Goodson (Signed) - Its Secretary. COACHELLA VALLEY BOUNTY WATER DISTRICT By. Harry W. Forbes (Signed)_- . Its President (SEAL) ATTEST: Helen F. Run n i ed) Its Secretary -14- 177 EXHIBIT ngn DESCRIPTION OF LANDS WITHIN COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND ITS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.'l AND WITHIN THE COACHELLA SERVICE AREA. All that certain tract of land situate in the County of Riverside, State of California, and in,the Townships (designated "T") hereinafter mentioned South, and Ranges (designated nRn) hereinafter mentioned East, of the San Bernardino Base Line and Meridian, particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the S.W. corner of the S.E. of Section 31, Township 8 South, Range 9 East, which is a point in the South boundary line of said Coachella Valley County Water District and thence along straight lines 1. To the S.W. corner of Sec. 10, T. 8, R. 8. thence 2. To the S.W. corner of the S.E.} of Sec. 33, T. 79 R. 8, thence. 3. To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 33, thence 44 To the S.W. corner of the N.E.J of Sec. 19, T. 7, R. 8, thence 5. . To the Sall►* corner of the N.W.j of said Sec. 19, thence ,along the West line of said Sec. 19 b. To the N.W. corner of said Sec. 19, thence along the South line of Sec. 13, T. 7, R. 7. 7. To the S.W. corner of said Sec. 13, thence along the West line of said Sec. 13 8. To the N.W. corner of said Sec. 13, thence 9. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.j of Sec, 11, T. 7, R. 7, thence 10. To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of said See. 11, thence along the West line of 'said Sec. 11 11. To the N.W. corner of said Sec. 11, thence along the South line of Sec. 3 -1• 178 in said Tovvnship and Range 12. To the S.W. corner of said Sec. 3, thence along the West line of said Sec. 3 13. To the N.W. corner of said Sec., 3, thence along the South line of Secs. 34 and 339 T. 6 South, R: 7 East 14. To the S.W. corner of the S.E.; of Sec. 33, T. 69 R. 7, thence 15. To the S.6'd* corner of the N.E. of Sec. 28, T. 69 R. 7, thence 16. To the S.W. corner of the NX4 of said Sec. 28, thence 17. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of Sec. 20, T. 61 R. 7, thence 18. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 20, thence 19. To the S.W. corner of the S.E.j of the N.W. of said Sec. 20, thence 20. To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of the N.W., of said Sec. 20, thence 21. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of Sac. 170 T. 60 R. 7, thence 22. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of Sec. 8, T. 60 R, 7, thence 23. To the S.W. corner of the S.E.. -of the N *Wd , of said Sec. 8, thence 24. To the S X, corner of the N.E. of the N.W.j of said Sec. B. thence 25, To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of the N.W.J of said Sec. 8, thence 26* To the N.W. corner of said Sec. 8, thence 27. To the N.W. cornor of the N.E.J of the N.E.1 of Sec. 79 T. 6, R. 7, thence 28. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.} of the N.E. of said Sec. 7, thence 29. To the S6W* corner of the N.E. of the N.W. of said Sec. 7, thence 30. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the N.W. of said See. 7j thence 31% To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of -said Sec..7, thence along the West line of said See. 7 32. To the S.E. corner of Sec. 12 T. 6, R. 6, thence along the South line of !aid Sec. 1 33. To the S.W. corner of the S.E4 of said Sec. 1. thence —2- 179 34• To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 1, thence along the North line MEM of said Sea. 1 a 35, To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of the S.E.j of Sec. 36, T. 5, R. 6, thence 36. To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of the S.Eej of said Sec. 36, thence 37. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.J of Sec. 319 T. 59 R. 7, thence 380 To the S.W. corner of the N.E4 of Sec. 19, To 5, R. 7, thence 39: To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 19, thence 40. North along the West line of said T. 5, South to a point in the North- easterly line of the right-of-way of the State Highway commonly known as IIU. S. High- way 9911, thence 41. Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of said right-of-way of said Highway to the intersection of said line with the Westerly line of the E.J of Sec• 19, T. 4, R. 6, thence 42. To the N.W. corner of the S.E,t of Sec. 18, T. 41 R. 6, thence 43. To the N.E. corner of the S.E. of Sec. 15, T. 4, R. 6, thence 44, To the S.W. corner of the N.W.1: of Sec. 230 T. 4, R• 6, thence 45. To the N.E►'corner of the S.E.4 of Sec. 24, T. 4, Re 6, thence 46. To the S. We corner of the S,EJ of Sec. 34, T. 49 R. 7, thence 47. To the N.E. corner of Sec. 3, T. 5, R. 7, thence 48. To the S.W. corner of the N,W.�- of the N.W. of Sec. 2, T. 5, R. 7, thence 49. To the S.E. corner of the NeE,; of the N.W. of said Sec. 2, thence 50. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 2, thence 51. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.of Sec. 1, To 5, R. 7, thence 52. To the S.W. corner of the SeE.� of said Seo. 1, thence 53. To the S.W. corner of Sec. 6, To 52 R. 8, thence 54. To the S.W. corner of Sec. 15, T. 51 R. 89 thence along the West line of Sec. 22, T. 5, Re 8 55. To the S.W. corner of said Sec. 22, thence ft3- 180 56. To the S.W, corner of the S.E. of Sec. 27, 1. 59 R. 8, thence 57. To the S X. corner of the N.W.,}, of the N.E. of Sec. 34, T. 5, R. 89thence 58. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.4 of the N.E. of said Sec. 34, thence 59. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of the S.E.; of said Sec. 34, thence 60. To the S.E. corner of the N.EA of the S.E. of Sec. 34, T. 51 R. 8, thence along the East line of said Sec. 34 61. To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 34, thence along the North line of Sec. 29 T. 60 Re 8 62. To the N.E. corner of the N.111.� of the N.W. of said Sec. 2, thence 63. To the S.E. corner of the N.17.� of the N.W.4 of said Sec. 2, thence, 64. To the S.E. corner of the N.E4 of the N.W. of said Sec. 20 thence 65. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.} of said Sec. 29 thence 66. To the N.E. corner of the NX4 of the S.E. of said Sec. 2, thence 67. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.. of the S.E.- of said Sec. 2, thence 68. To the S.E. corner of the N.E. of the S.E. of said Sec. 2, thence along the Fast line of said Sec. 2 69. To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 2, thence 70. To the S.E. corner of Sec. 13, T. 60 R. 8, thence 71, To the S.E. corner of Sec. 30 T. 7, R. 9, thence along the South lines of Sections 2 and 1 in said Township and Range 72. To the N.E. corner of the N.W. of the N.W. of Sec. 12, T. 7, R. 9, thence 73. To the S.E. corner of the N.W.1 of the NoWJ of said Sec. 12, thence 74. To the N.E. corner of the S.E. of the N.W. of said Sec. 12� thence 754 To the S.W. corner of'the N.E. of said Sec. 12, thence 76. To the N•E, corner of the S.E.�•of said Sec. 12, being a point on the East boUnd,ry line of said Coachella Valley County Water District, thence 77. South along said boundary line to the S.$o corner of Sec. 25, T. 7, R. 9, thence along the South lines of said See. 25 and of Sea. 26 in said Township and 78. To the S X. corner of said Sac. 26, thence 79• To the N.E. corner of the S.E. of the S.E.4 of Sec. 27, T. 7, R• 9, thence 80, To the N.W. corner of the S.W. of the S.E. of said Sec. 27, thence 81, To the N.E. corner of the S.W. of said Sec. 27, thence 82, To the NX. corner of the S.W. of said Sec. 27, thence 83. To the N.E. corner of the S.E.` of the N,Ee� of Sec. 289 T. 7, R. 9, thence 84. To the N.W. corner of the S.W. of the N.E. of said Sec. 28, thence 85. To the N.E. corner of the N.W.l of said Sec. 280 T. 79 R. 9, thence along the North lines of said Sec. 28 and of Sec, 29 in said Township and Range 86, To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 29, thence 87, To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of the N.}.} of said Sec, 29, thence 88. To the N.W.,corner of the S.E. of the N.W.4- of said Sec. 290 thence 89, To the S.E, corner of the S.W. of the N.W. of said Sec. 29, thence 90, To the S,W, corner of the S.E. of the N.W. of Sec. 30, T. 7, R. 9, thence 91. To the S.E. corner of the N.W. of the N.W. of said Sec. 30, thence 92. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of the N.E. of Sec. 250 T. 7, R. $,,thence 93• To the S.W. corner of the S,Eo4 of the N.E. of said Sec. 25, thence 94. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.}�of said Sec. 25, thence 95, To the S'.E, corner of the N.E. }of the S.W. of said Sec. 25, thence 96. To the N.E. corner of the S.W.} of the S.W. of said See, 25, thence 97, To the S.E. corner of the S.M of the N.W,� "of Sec. 369 T, 7, R, 8p thence 980 To -the N.E. corner of the S,W.1 of said Sec. 36, thence 99, To the S.E. corner of the N.E.t of the S.W. of said See. 36, thence 100, To the.N,E. corner of the S.E,� of the S X 4 of said Sec. 36, thence along the East line of said Sele.' 36 182 101. To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 36,'thence 102. To the N.E. corner of the N.W. of the N.W.'j of Sec.. 6, T. 8, R. 9, thence 103, To the N.E. corner of the S.W. of the S;W.� of Sec. 79 T. 8, R. 9, thence 104• To the N.O. corner of the S.W. -of the OU4 of said Sec. 7, thence along the West lines of said Sec. 7 and of Sec. 18 in said Township and Range 105. To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of the N.W. of said Sec. 18,.. thence 106. To the S.E. corner of the N.Wod of the N.W. of said Sec, 189 thence 107. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the N.W. of said Sec. 180 thence 108. To the S.E. corner of the Navf,of said Sec. 18, thence 109. To the S.E, corner of the N.E. of the'S.W.� of said Sec. 18, thence 110, To the N.E. corner of the S.E.j of the S.E.t of said Sec. 180 thence along the East lines of said Sec. 18 and of Sec. 19 in said Township and Range 111. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.I of the NoW4 of Sec. 20, T. So R. 9, • thence ,112. To the,N.E, corner of the S.W. of the N.W.j of said Sec. 20, thence 113. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the N.w.j of said Sec. 20, thence 114. To the S.E. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 201, thence 115. To the N.W. corner of the S.YI.�, of tho S.W.j of Sec. 21, T. S,'R. 9, thence 116. To the N.E. corner of the SX4 of the S.W.J of said Sec, 212 thence 117. To.the S.E. corner of the SoW4 of the S.W.}.'of said Sec. 21, thence 118. To the N.E. corner of the N.W. of Sec. 289 T. 8, R. 9, thence 119. To the S.E. corner of the N.W. of said Sec;,28, thence 120, To the N.E. corner of the N.W4 of the'S.E.� of said Sec. 28, thence 121. To the N.W. corner of the N.E.j of the N.E.k of Sec. 33, T. 8, R. 9, thence along the North line of 8Aid Sec. 33 122. To the N.E. corner of said Sec, 33, thence along the East line of said _6.. 183 See. 33 123. To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 330 being a point in the Southerly bound— ary line of said Coachella Valley County Water District and of said County of Riverside p thence 124. West along said District and County boundary lines to the point of begin- ni.n6. s �� 184 EXHIBIT "C" DESCRIPTION OF LANDS OUTSIDE CQACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE COACHELLA SERVICE AREA, DESIGNATED THE SALTON AREA. All that certain tract of land situate in the County of Riverside, State of California, and in the Townships (designated 'IT") hereinafter mentioned South' and Ranges (designated nRu) hereinafter mentioned East, of the San Bernardino Base Line and Meridian, particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the N.W. corner of Section 18, Township 7 South, Range 10 East, which is a point'in the East boundary line of said Coachella Valley County Water Dis- trict, and running thence along the Northerly boundary lines of said Section 18 and of Section 17 in said Township and Ranges 1. To the N.E. corner of Sec. 17, T. 71 R. 10, thence 2. To the N.W. corner of Sec. 26, T. 7, R. 10, thence 3. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of the S.E. of said Sec. 26, thence 4. To the S.W. corner of the N.71.� of Sec. 36, T. 7, R. 10, thence 5. To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 36, thence 6. To the S.E. corner -of Sec. 61 T. 8, R. 11, thence 7. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of said Sec, 6, thence 8. To the S•E. corner of the N.W. of Sec, 70 T. 80 R. 11, thence 9. To the S.Vj. corner Of the S.E.1 of the N.W. of said Sec. 7, thence 10. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the S.W•} of said Sec. 7, thence 11. To the N.ET corner of the N.YJ.� of Sec. 18, T. 8, R. 11, thence 12. To the S•E9 corner of the N,Vlo} of said Sec. 18, thence 13. Along the Southerly line of,the N.W. of said Sec. 18, and the Westerly -1- 185 projection of said Southerly line to an,intersection with the Northeasterly line of the Southern Pacific main line railroad right-of-way running through the N X6a of Seca 130 T. 80 R. 10, thence t 14. Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of said railroad right-of-way to the intersection of said Northeasterly line with the South line of Sec. 28p T. 7, Re 10, or the Easterly projection thereofo thence along the Southerly lines of said Seca'28 and of Sec. 29 and Sec. 30 in said Township and Rangep , 15• To the S.W• corner of said See. 30i being a point in the East boundary line of said,Coachella Valley County Water District, thence 16. North along said District 'boundary line to the -point of beginning. VI 11 -2- 186 l� VVUTUTT ffnll DESCRIPTION OF LANDS OUTSIDE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE COACHELLA SERVICE AREA, DESIGNATED THE DOS PALMAS AREA. All that certain tract of land situate in the Counties of Riverside and Imperial, State of California, and in the Townships (designated 11111) hereinafter mentioned South, and Ranges (designated "Rif) hereinafter mentioned East, of the San Bernar- I - lino Base Line and Meridian, particularly described as follows, to -wit; Beginning at the S.E. corner of Sec. 33, T. 8 South, R. 12 East, which is a point izi the Southerly boundary line of said County of Riverside, and running thence along the Easterly boundary line of said Sec. 33: 1. To the N.E. corner of the S.I� — of the S.E. of said Sec. 33, thence 2. To the N.W. corner of the S..sb'.�- of the S.E.} of said Sec. 33, thence 3. To the N.E. corner of the S.W,j of said Sec. 33, thence 4. To the S.W. corner of the S,EJ of the N.W.1 of said Sec. 33, thence 5• To the N.E. corner of the S.W.1 of the N-Wsj of said Sec. 33, thence 6. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.1 of the N.E. of Sec. 32, T. 8, R. 12, thence 7. To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 32, thence 8. Along the Northerly line of said Sec. 32 to the N.W. corner of the N.E.j of the NXof said Sec. 32, thence 9. To the N.E. corner of the S.W. of the S.W. of'Sec. 29, T. 80 R. 12, thence 10. To the N.1'J. corner of said 8,44 of the S.W.;, of said Sec. 29, thence u• Along the Vt►esterly boundary line of said See. 29 to the N,Wo corner of the 8.►W4 of said Sec. 29, thence 12. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.} of Sec. 30, T. 8, R. 12, thence I �l- 187 13, To the N.E. corner of the NoWf of said Sec. 30, thence 14. Along the Northerly boundary line of said See. 30 to the N X. corner of said Sees 30, thence 15. Along the Westerly boundary line of Sec. 19, T. 8, R. 120 to the N.W. cor- ner of said Soo. 19, thence 16. Along the Southerly boundary line of Sec. 130,T. 8, R. 11, to the S,W. cor- nor of the S.E. of the S.E. of said Sec. 13, thence 17, To the N.W. corner of the S.E. of the N.E.4 of Sec. 120 T. 8, R. 11, thence 18, To the N.E, corner of the S.E. of the N.t.� of Sec. 70 T, 84 R. 12, thence 19• Along the Easterly boundary line of said Sec. 7 to the S,E, corner of said Sec. 7, thence 20, To the S.E. corner of Sec. 17, T. 8, R, 12, thence 21. Along the Westerly boundary line of Sec. 21, T. 8, R. 12, to the S.Wp cor- ner of ,the N,W.� of said Section, thence 22. To the N,E, corner of the S.IQ of said Sec. 21, thence 23. To the N.W. corner of the S:-'Q of the S.E. of said Sec. 21, thence 24. To t41e N.E. cornc;r of the S,E.� of the S.E. of said Sec.. 21, thence 25. Along the Easterly boundary line of said Sec. 21 to the S.E.corner of said Sec. 21, thence 26. Along the Northerly boundary line of Sec. 27, T. 8, R. 12, to the N.E. cor- of the N.W. of said Sec. 27, thence 27. To the'S.E, corner of Sec. 26, T. 8, R. 12, thence. 28. Along a straight line between the N,W. corner and the S.E. corner of Sec. 369 T. 8, R. 12, to a point where said straight line intersects a projection Mc therly of the East line of Sec. 2, T. 9, R. 12' thence 29. Along said last -.named projected line and the East line of said See. 2 to -2- 1 188 the S.E. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 2, thence 30. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 20 thence 31. To the S.E. corner of the S.W.j of said Sec. 2, thence 32. Along the Southerly boundary line of said Sec. 2 to the S.W. corner 6f the S.E.I of the S.W. of said Sec. 2, thence 33• To the S,Eo corner of the N,W.J, of tho N.W.k of Sec. 110 T. 99 R. 120 thence 34, To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of the N.W.? of Sec. 10, T, 93 R. 12, thence 35, Along the West line of Sec. 10 to the N.W. corner of said Sec. 10, thence 36. Along the South line of Sec. 4, T. 91 R. 12, to the`S:/1. corner of the S"E4 of the S.E. of said Sec. 4, thence 37. To the N.W. corner of the S.E. of the S.E. of said Sec. 4, thence 38. To the S.W. corner of the NoWii of the S.E.k of said See. 4, thence 39. To the N.W. corner of the N.E.?, of said Sec. 4, being a point `in the South- erly boundary line of said County of Riverside, thence 40. Along said boundary line and the Northerly boundary line of said Sec. 4 to the point of beginning. -3- 189 V.YPTATT nRu DESCRIPTION OF LANDS OUTSIDE-COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE COACHELLA SERVICE AREAL , DESIGNATED THE FISH SPRINGS ARF'A ate in the County of Imperial, State of ALL that certain tract of land situ galifornia, and in the Townships (designated 'IT") hereinafter mentioned South, and Ranges (designated "R") hereinafter mentioned East, of the San Bernardino Base Line and Meridian, particularly described as follows, to -Witt Beginning at the N.E. corner of the NoW4 of Sec. 4s T. 9, Re 9, which is a point in the South boundary line of Coachella Valley County Water District and of the County of Riverside and the North Boundary, line of the County of Imperial and run— ning thence along said boundary linaq and along the Northerly boundary lines of said sec. A and of Sec. 5, T. 99 Re 92 1....To the N.E. corner cf the N.W. of the N.W.J. of said Sec• 5, thence 2. To the S.E. corner of the S.M of the No .k.-of Sec. 8, To 91, Re 9, thence 3. To the S.E. corner of the N.W.J of said Sec. 89 thence 4. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of said Sec. 8,, thence 5. To the S.E, corner of Sec. 17, T. 9, Re 99 thence 6. To the S.E. corner of Sec. 21, T. 9, Re 9, thence 7..To the S.W. corner of Sec. 121, T. 10� Re 9, thence 8- Along the Southerly boundary line of said Sea. 12 to the S,E.`corner of said Sec• 12, thence 9• To the S.E. corner of See. 6, T. 10, Re 10,, thence To the N.E. corner of the NoW4 of said Seca 6, thence To the S.!y.,corner of the N,E•i of the N.E.* of, Sec. 16, T. 9, Re 9j thence 1- 190 12; To the NoZi corner af the M014 of the SbEs� of Secs 4, T. 99 Re 9, thence 13;' To the SX*' corder of the Mit of said Sec. 4j thence to the point of b gimnin6. f 4- 191 Annex ffA'l UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of -,Reclamation BOULDER CANYON PROJECT ALL-ANERI CAN CANAL COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Contract for Construction of Caeacity in Diversion Dam Main Carial and A urtrenant Structures and for Delivery of Neater. Article 1. THIS CONTRACT, made this day of nine- teen hundred thirty-four, pursuant to the Act of Congress approved June 170 1902 (32 Stat., 388), and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, all of which acts are commonly known and referred to as the Reclamation Law, and particularly pursuant to the Act of Congress approved December 21, 1928 (45 Stat., 1057), desig- nated the Boulder Canyon Project Act, and the Act of Congress approved June 16, 1933 (48 Stat., 195), designated the National Industrial Recovery Act, between THE UNITED STATES OF Ar!E,;RICA, hereinafter referred to as the United States, acting for this purpose by Harold L. Ickes, Federal Emergency Administrator of Public Works and Secretary of the Interior, hereinafter styled the Secretary, and COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a County Water District created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the County Water District Act of the State of California, and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, with its principal place of business at Coachella, Riverside County, California, hereinafter referred to as the District; WI TN ESSETHs Explanatory Recitals Article 2. WHEREAS, for the purpose of controlling the floods, improving navi- gation and regulating the flow of the Colorado River, providing for storage and for the delivery of the stored waters for reclamation of public lands and other benefim cial uses exclusively within the United States, the Secretary, subject to the terms 192 of the Colorado River Compact, is authorized to construct, operate and maintain a dam and incidental works in the main stream of the Colorado River at Black Canyon or Boulder Canyon, adequate to create a storage reservoir of a capacity of not less than twenty -million acre-feet of water, and a main canal and appurtenant structures located entirely within the United States connecting the Laguna Dam, or other suit- able diversion dam, which the Secretary is also authorized to construct if deemed necessary or advisable by him upon engineering or economic considerations, with the Imperial and Coachella Valleys in California, the expenditures for said main canal and appurtenant structures to be reimbursable as provided in the reclamation law; and Article 3. WHEREAS, after full consideration of the advantages of both the Black Canyon and Boulder Canyon dam sites, the Secretary has determined upon Black Canyon as the site of the aforesaid dam, hereinafter styled the Boulder Dam, creating thereby a reservoir to be hereinafter styled the Boulder Canyon Reservoir; and Article 4. WHEFOAS, (a) there are included within the boundaries of the Dis- trict areas of private and public lands and additional private and public lands will, by appropriate proceedings, be added to the District and to the Coachella Service Area, defined in Article 17 hereof; and (b) There has been executed under date of December 10 1932, a contract, herein styled Imperial Contract, between the United States and Imperial Irrigation Districts an irrigation district created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, which contract provides for the construction of a suitable diversion dam and main canal and appurtenant structures, therein and herein after respectively styled "Imperial Dam" and "All -American Canalli, located entirely within the United States, connecting with the Imperial and Coachella Valleys, and for the delivery to said Imperial Irrigation District of stored water from Boulder Can- yon Reservoir; and (c) Certain controversies between said two districts relating to their respec- tive interests in water and power on said All -American Canal have been settled and w2� 193 compromised by an agreement executed between said two districts, dated February 14th, 1934, a triplicate original of which said agreement was on 1934, filed with the Secretary; and (d) The District is desirous of entering into a contract for the construction of certain capacity for it in said Imperial Dam and All -American Canal and for the delivery to the District, for the benefit of the lands under or that will be served from the All4merican Canal in Coachella Valley, now or hereafter within the District and lying within said Coachella Service Area, of stored water from Boulder Canyon Reservoir, such contract to be in harmony with the provisions of said Imperial Contract and those of said agreement dated February 14th, 1934; and Article 5. WHEREAS, The Secretary has determined, upon engineering and economic considerations, that it is advisable to provide for the construction of such Imperial Dam and All -American Canal, and has determined that the revenues provided for by this contract are adequate in his judgment to insure payment of all expenses of construction, operation and maintenance of the capacity in said Imperial Dam and All - American Canal to be constructed hereunder, in the manner provided in the reclamation law; Article b. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows, to -wit: Construction b United States Article 7, The United States will construct the Imperial Dam in the main stream of the Colorado River at the approximate location indicated on the map marked Exhibit "An attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and will also construct the All -American Canal to the Imperial and Coachella Vallcys, the approxi- mate location of said canal to be as shown on the aforesaid Exhibit "A1l. Said canal shall be so constructed as to provide a designed capacity of one thousand five hundred (1500) cubic feet of water per second, to be used by the District for the benefit of 194 -3- the lands now or hereafter within the District and lying within said Coachella Service Area, from and including the diversion and desilting works at said dam to the southerly end of that portion of the All -American Canal designated on said FXhibit 'All as 'Main (All, -American) Canal to Coachella Valley" (hereinafter styled nCoachella Main Canal"),, Said Coachella Main Canal shall be constructed with such capacities as the Secretary may conclusively determine to be necessary or advisable upon engineering or economic considerations to accomplish the ends contemplated by this contract; provided, however] that changes in capacities, locationso lengths and alignments, may be made during the progress of the work as may, in the opinion of the Secretary, whose opinion shall be final and binding upon the parties heretoo be expedient, economical, necessary or advisable, except the capacity above indicated from and including the diversion and desilting works at Imperial Dam to the Southerly end of said Coachella Main Canal, which capacity may be changed only by mutual agree- ment between the Secretary and the District. The ultimate, cost to said two districts of the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal shall in no event exceed the aggregate sum of thirty-eight million, five hundred thousand dollars (338,500,000.00). Such cost shall include all expenses of whatsoever kind heretofore or hereafter incurred by the United States from the Reclamation Fund or the Colorado River Dam fund in connec- tion with, growing out of, or resulting from the construction of said Imperial Dam and All -American Canal, including but not limited to the cost of labor, materials, equipment, engineering, legal work, superintendence, administration, overhead, any and all costs arising from operation and maintenance of said Imperial Dam and All - American Canal prior to the time that said costs are assumed respectively by the said two districts, damage of all kinds and character and rights -of -way as herein- after provided. The District hereby agrees to re -pay to the United States its share of all expenditures incurred on account of any and all damages due to the existence, Operation or maintenance of the diversion dam and main canal, the incurrence of which increases expenditures by the United States beyond said sum of $38t500,000.00. 195 �4- The District shall re -pay the same share of said expenditures as the share to be paid by the District under Article 10 (b) hereof of the capital cost of the particu- lar part of said works causing such damage, The United States will invoke all logal and valid reservations of rights -of -way under acts of Congress, or otherwise reserved or held by it, without cost to the District, except that the United States reserves the right where rights -of -way are thus acquired to reimburse the owners of such lands for the value of improvements which may be destroyed, and the District agrees that the United States may include such disbursements in the cost of the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal. If rights -of -way are required over an existing project of the Bureau of Reclamation, such sum or sums as may be necessary to reimburse the United States on account of the construction charges allocated to irrigable areas absorbed in such rights -of -way shall also be considered as a part of and be included with other costs of the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal, The District agrees to convey to the United States without cost, unencumbered fee simple title to any and all lands now owned by it which, in the opinion of the Secretary, may bd required for right -of --way purposes for the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal; and the District agrees that Imperial Irrigation District may convey to the United States, unencumbered fee simple title to,any and all lands now owned by it which, in the opinion of the Secretary, may be required for right-of-way purposes for those por- tions of the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal to be used in common by said two districts, at the fair market value thereof, to be determined by the Secretary, such value to be considered (as to the District) as a part of and included with other costs of the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal.' Where rights -of -way within the State of California are required for the construction of Imperial Dam and All - American Canal, and such rights of way are not reserved to the United States under Acts of Congress, or otherwise, or the lands over which such rights of way are re- quired are not then owned by either of said two districts, then the District agrees, 196 -5� } (a) that it will, upon request of the Secretary, acquire title to such lands required { for such purposes as lie north of the lowest turnout for East Mesa on said Coachella Main Canal, and in turn convey unencumbered fee simple title thereto to the United States at the actual cost thereof to the District, subject to the approval of such cost by the Secretary; and (b) agrees that Imperial Irrigation District, upon request of the Secretary, may acquire title to any such lands required for such purposes as lie south of the Northerly boundary line of Township Eloven (11)9 South of the San Bernardino Base Line, and likewise convey unencumbered fee simple title thereto to the United States at the actual cost thereof to the Imperial Irrigation District, subject to the approval of such cost by the Secretaryf Assumaion of Operation and Maintenance of Common and Separate Works. Article g. (a). Imperial Dam and All -American Canal and Laguna Dam except (i) that portion of said Coachella Main Canal lying North of the Lowest turnout for East Mesa and (ii) that portion of the All --American Canal lying West of the Southerly end of said Coachella Main Canal and designated on said Exhibit "A" as "Main (All Ameri- can) Canal to Imperial Valley" are herein styled "common works". Upon sixty (60) days written notice from the Secretary of the completion of construction of the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal, or of any major unit thereof useful to said two districts or either of them, as determined by the Secretary, whose determination thereof shall be final and binding upon the parties hereto, said Imperial Irrigation District may assume the care, operation and maintenance of said common works, or major units thereof, and thereafter said Imporial Irrigation District may care for, operate and maintain the same, in such avanner that such works shall remain in as good and efficient condition and of equal capacity for the diversion, transportation and distribution of water as when received from the United States, reasunable wear and damage by the elemr.xxts excepted. The United States may, from time to time, in the discretion of the Secretary, resume operation and maintenance of said Imperial Dam —� 197 upon not less than sixty (60) days written notice and require reassumption thereof by said Imperial Irrigation District on like noticed During such times, after comple- tion, as the Imperial Dam is operated and maintained by the United States, the District shall on March first of each year advance to the United States its share of the estimated cost of operation and maintenance for the following twelve months, upon estimates furnished therefor on or before September first next precedings Such share to be adv=ced by the District shall be in the proportion that the capacity provided for the District in common works above Syphon Drop bears to the total capacity thereof. (b) From and after the assumption of operation and maintenance of said common works or any major unit thereof, by Imperial Irrigation District, the District shall bear such proportion of the cost of operation and maintenance (including repairs and replacements and any Charges made by the United States under Article Nine (9) hereof) of each component part of said common works, as the Capacity provided for the District in such component part bears to the total capacity thereof. The District agrees, expressly for the benefit of Imperial Irrigation District, to advance to Imperial Irrigation District on or before January first of each year its said proportionate share of the estimated cost for that year of such operation and maintenance in accordance with a written notice to be issued to it by Imperial Irrigation District, provided that payment shall in no event be due until thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice. Prior to March first of each year Imperial Irrigation District shall, provide the District with a written statement showing in detail the cost for the previous year for operation and maintenance of the works on account of which the District has made advances. Differences between actual costs and estimated costs shall be adjusted in next succeeding notices. Upon request of the District, both the advance notice of estimated costs and the subsequent statement of actual costs for each year shall be reviewed by the Secretary and his determination of proper 198 -i+ charges shall be final. Such review shall not change the due date for adv,anee pay- ments as herein provided and the cost of such review shall be borne equally by said two districts. The Imperial Irrigation District may at its option withhold delivery of water from the District until its proportionate share of the costs of operation and maintenance has been advanced or paid, as in this article provided and until all sums due Imperial Irrigation District under Article 10 (c) hereof have been paid. (c) Upon sixty (60) days written notice from the Secretary of the completion of construction of the Coachella Main Canal and appurtenant structures or of any major unit thereof useful to the District, as determined by the Secretary, whose determination thereof shall be final and bindingon the parties heretop the District shall assume the care, operation and maintenance of all such works north of the lowest turnout for East Mesa on said Coachella Main Canal, and' thereafter the Dis- trict shall, at its own cost and without expense to the United States, care for, operate and maintain the same in such mariner that such works shall remain in as good and efficient condition and of equal capacity for the transportation and distribu- tion of water as when received from the United States, reasonable wear and damage by the elements excepted. Upon like notice Imperial Irrigation District may assume the care, operation and maintenance, at its own cost, of all works designated on said Exhibit "All as "Main (All American) Canal to Imperial Valleyll, lying west of the southerly end of the Coachella Main Canal. (d) After the care, operation and maintenance of any of the aforesaid works have been assumod by the District, the District shall save the United States, its officers, agents and employees harmless as to any and all injury and damage to persons and property which may arise out of the care, operation and maintenance thereof• In the event the United States falls to complete the works herein contem- plated and the District fails to elect to make use of works theretofore partially or 199 wholly constructed, the District shall be fully relieved of any and all responsibil- ity for any further operation and maintenance of any vrorks theretofore taken over by the District for that purpose and thereupon the District shall no longer be re- sponsible for said maintenance or operation or damage to person or property which ;nay arise therefrom. Keeping Diversion Dram Main Canal and a2purtenant Structures in Repair Article 9. Except in case of emergency no substantial change in any of the works to be constructed by the United States and transferred to either of said two districts under the provisions hereof or under said Imperial Contract shall be made by such district, without first having had and obtained the written consent of the Secretary and the Secretary's opinion as to whether any change in any such works is or is not substantial shall be conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto. Such district shall promptly make any and all repairs to and replacements of all said works transferred to it under the terms and conditions hereof or under said Imperial Contract which, in the opinion of the Secretary, are deemed necessary for the proper operation and maintenance of such works, Ia case of neglect or failure of such district to make such repairs, the United States may, at its option, after reasonable notice to such district, cause such repairs to be made and charge the actual cost thereof, plus fifteen per centum (15%) to cover overhead and general, expense to such district operating the works so repaired, On or before September first of each calendar year the United States shall give written notice to such district operating such works of the amount expended by the United States for re- pairs under this article during the twelve-month period immediately preceding. Such cost, plus overhead and general expense as stated abovo, shall be repaid by such district operating such works on March first immediately succeeding$ rgr 200 A m-ement by District tc)_2,-xy for Works Constructed y the _United Stags Article 10. (a) The District agmr es to pay the United States its share, ,as defi.ne:d in sub -,-article (b) of this Article, of the actual cost, not exceeding thirty- eight million five hundred thousand dollars ($38000,000,00)1 incurrc;d by the United States'on account of the Imp<Drial Dam and All -American Cann12 subject, however, to the provisions of Article seven (7) hereof; provided, that should Congress and other C,overnmental financing; authorities fail to make necr;ssary appropriations or alloca- tions of money to complete the work herein provided for, then the Secretary may, at such reasonable time as he r&ay consider advisable:, after Congress and such other Governmental authorities ahall have: failod for five (5) consecutive: years to make tho necessary appropriations or allocations which shall have been annually requested by the Secretary, give the District notice of the termination of work by the United States and furnish a statement of the, amount actually expended by the United States thereon. Upon the receipt of such notice by the District, the District shall be given two (2) years from and after such receipt of n0tica to elect whether it will utilize said works ther,.tofory constructed h,:rutuider, or some particular part there- of. Such election on the part of the District shall be oxprossod by resolution of the Board of Directors submitted to the electorate of the District for approval or rejection in the manner provided by law for submission of contracts with the: United States. If the: District elects not to utilize, or fails within said two-year period to elect to utilize said works constructed herotmder, or some portion thereof, then the District'shall havo no further rights theroon and no obligations therefor. If the District elects to utilize] sold works or a portion thereof, then the reasonable value to the District of tho works so utilized, not excoerding the actual cost there- of to the United States, shall be paid by the District under the torms of this contract; the first payment to be due and payable on the first day of March following the first day of August next succeeding the .final determination of the reasonable 'rlo- 201 value to the District of such works, in case no further work is done by the District. Should the District elect to complete the work contemplated by this contract, or some portion thereof,, the first payment shall be due and payable on the first day of March following the first day of August next succeeding the date of final completion of the work by the District as determined by the Secretary. In determining the value of such works to the District there shall be taken into account, among other things, the method of financing required and cost of money, so that in no event shall all of the works contemplated by this oontract.cost the District more than they would have cost the District had they all been constructed by the United States under the terms of this contract. In the event of failure of the parties to agree as to the reason- able value to the District of the works which the District elects to use,.the same shall be determined as provided in Article twenty-six (26) hereof. (b) The amounts herein agreed to be paid by the Dist ?jet to the United States shall be in accordance with the following proportions, which proportions the Secre- tary hereby determines to be equitable and just, to -wit: i. That proportion of the total cost of that part of said common works above Syphon Drop, excepting Laguna Dam, that the capacity provided for the District there- in bears to the total capacity thereof less the capacity to,be provided without cost ,to and for the Yuma Project? ii: That proportion of the total cost of each component part of all said common works, other than the part 'above Syphon Drop, that the capacity provided ,for the District in such part of said works bears to the total capacity thereof. iii. The entire cost of all works iNorth of this, lowest turnout .for East Ucsa on the Coachella Main Canal. ( c) The District' �agroes to pay to the United Staters on the 31st day of December of each year commencing Decembor 31, 105, a portion (computed in the same manner as its share'of costs of common works above Syphon Drop as agreed in Article 10 (b) i hereof) of each of the annual paymnta (togethar with interest required theraon, ) .114. 202 then or thereafter required to be made by Imperial Irrigation District to the United States fora connection with Laguna Dam, under its contract dated October 231 19180 and under Article sixteen (16) of said Imperial Contract, or otherwise. The Secretary hereby determines that it is equitable and just thst the District pay, and the District agrees, expressly for the benefit of imperial Irrigation District, to pay Imperial Irrigation District the same proportion of the aggregate sum which shall have been paid by Imperial Irrigation District to the United States prior to December 31, 1935, for a connection with Laguna Dam, as aforesaid, as the proportion herein agreed to be paid by the District to the United States of payments hereafter to be made for said connection with Laguna Dam* The' aggregate sum to be paid by the District to Imperial Irrigation District shall be divided into ten equal installments, payable Annually on March first of each year, commencing on or before the year 1939, with interest from data humof on unpaid balances at the rate of six per centum (6%) per annum, payable Ua.reh 1st, 1936, and annually thereafter. At its option, the District may at any time pay any amount on principal of said aggregate sum in advance of the due date and interest on the amount so paid shall thereupon Cease, (d) The lands now in the District, which arc; also situate in the Coachella Service Area, as defined in Article seventeen (17) hereof, are 'designated and described in statement hereto attached, marked Exhibit 111311 and by this reference made a part hereof. The Board of Directors of the District does hereby declare, determine and find, and has by the ordinance by which it authorized the execution of this contract, declared, determined and found that only that,portion of the District with— in said area described'in said Exhibit "B" is susceptible, for service with water from the waterworks contemplated under this contract and that said area shall be and constitute improvement District No, 1 of the District@ Said Board of Directors does further declare, determine and find and has, by said ordinance, declared, determined "12" 203 1, and found that that portion of said Coachella Service Area not now in the District, MA of which description is hereto attached, marked ;±xhibit "CH and by this reference made: a part hereof, (hereinafter styled "Salton Areall), is also sudceptib_le of service from said water works, and that if and when said area described in Exhibit "CIT is added to the District, said area shall also be added to, and entitl(d to the s.a- mo benefits and subject to the same obligations as the lands in said Improvement District No. 1. Said Board of Directors does further declare, determine and find and has, by said ordinance, declared, determined and found, that thosa certain lands in said Coachella Service Area and not now in the District, (i) shown on said Exhibit "A" as enclosed within a hatched border ling: and marked "Dos Palmas Areal', of which description is hereto attached, marked Exhibit I'D" and by this reference made a part hereof, and (ii) shown on said Exhibit "A" as bounded on the East, South and West by a. like, hatched border lino and on the North by the North boundary line of Imperial County and lying Wept of Salton Sea, (herein styled "Fish Springs Area") of which description is hereto attached, marked Exhibit III;" and by this reference made a part hereof, are also susceptible of service from said waterworks and that if and when said Dos Palmas Area, or any part thereof, is added to the District, it shall be and constitute improvement District No. 2 of the District, and that if and when said Fish Springs Area, or any part thereof, is added to the District, it shall be and constitute Improvement District No. 3 of the District. All lands now or hereafter situate both in said Coachella Service Area and in tho District are, as a whole,, obligated to pay to the United States the full amount herein agreed upon, regardless of the default or failure of any tract, or of any landowner, in the payment of the taxes levied by the District against such tract or landowner, and the: District shall, when necessary, levy and collect appropriate taxes to make up for the default or dolincauency of any such tract of' land or of any such landowner in the payment of taxes, so that in any event, and regardless of any " 13" 204 defaults or delinquencies in the payment of any tax or taxes, the amounts due or to become due the United States shall be paid to the United States by the District when due. No lands in the District shall be charged with any taxes or a3sessnients under this contract except those situate within said Coachella Service Area, as defined in Article seventeen (17) hereof, or as thereunder modified. The Improvement Districts above mentioned are hereby required to be constituted and created as'noarly as may be, in the manner prescribed in said County Water District -Act for creation of Improvement Districts in County Water Districts in case of ordinary issuance of bonds, Changes in 8oundnries of Coachella Service Area Article 11. After the date of this contract no change shall, be made in the boundaries of the Coachella Service Area as defined in Article seventeen (17) hereof and the Board of Directors shall make no order changing the boundaries of said Coachella Service Area except as provided in said Article seventeen (17); provided, however, that the Secretary hereby consents to the inclusion in said Coachella Service Area of all, of 'the lands described on Exhibits IIBII, "CIIO I'D" and OE" hereto attached. Terms of Pa ment Article 12. The amount herein agreed to be paid to the United States shall be due and payable in not more than forty (40) annual installments commencing with the calendar year next succeeding the year when notice of completion of all work provided for herein is given to the ,District ;or under the provisions of Article '10 (a) hereof upon termination of work through failure of Congr�:as and other Governmental a.uthor►- itics to make necessary appropriations or allocations therefor? The first five (5) of such annual installments shall each be one per eentum (1%) of the amount herein agreed to be paid to the United States; the next ten (10) of such installments' shall each be two per eentum (2%)°of,the amount herein agreed to be paid to the United •14" 205 States, and the remainder of such annual installments shall each be three per centum (3%), of the amount herein agreed to be paid to the United States. The sums payable annually as set forth above shall be divided into two (2) equal semi-annual paymentsp payable on March first and September first of each year; provided, however, that if notice of the completion of work is given to the District subsequent to August first of any year the first semi-annual installment of charges hereunder shall be due and payable on March first of the second succeeding year. 2peration and Maintenance Costs Article 13. Each agency which hem -after contracts for capacity to be provided for it in Imperial Dam and All. -American Cnnal and for which agency capacity is so provided shall bear such proportionate part of the cost of operation and maintenance (including repairs and replacements) of the component parts of Imperial Dam and All - American Canal and of the Laguna Dam as may be determined by the Secretary to be equitable and just, but not less than an amount in proportion to the total amount as are the relative capacities provided in each component part for such agoncy and for all other agencies, including the District. Each such agency shrill advance to each district operating any works provided to be used in common by such district and such agency on or before- Janu,.3ry first of each year, its proportionate share of the estimated cost for that your of operation and ,wintonance, in accordance with a notice to be issued by such district, provided threat payment shall in no event be due until thirty (30) drays after receipt of notice. Prior to March 1st of each year each such district shall provide each agency with a statement showing in detail the costs for the previous year for operation and maintenance of the works on account of which such agency has made advances. Differences between actual costs and estimated costs shall be adjusted in noxt succeeding notices. Upon request of any agency, both the advance notice of estimated costs grid the: subsequent statement of actual costs for each year shall be reviewed by the Secretary and his determination of propor charges . 15- 206 e shall be final. Such rwiew shall not change the duo date for advance paymonts as horein,provided, and the cost of such review shall be borne equally by the requesting agency and such district. Such district may, at its option, withhold the delivery of water from any agency until its proportionate share of the costs of operation and maintenance have been advanced or paid, as in this article provided. Power Possibilities Article 14. The power possibilities on the All -American Canal down to and including Syphon Drop with water carried for the benefit of the Yuma Project as provided for in Article fifteen (15) hereof, are horsby reserved to the United States. Subjeqt to this reservation and the participation by other agencies as pro- vided for in Article twenty-one (21) hereof, the District shall have the privilege of utilizing by contract or ctherwise, by means of the capacity to be provided for the District hereunder, such power possibilities, including those at or near Pilot Knob, as may exist upon said canal at points where and to the extent that water diverted and/or carried for the District contributes to 'the development of power; provided, that such privilege shall not interfere with thu utilizing by Imp�:rial Irrigation District of such power possibilities at or near Pilot Knob, by means of. the capacity to be provided for Imperial Irrigation District in the All -American Canal from Syphon Drop to Pilot Knob, in excess of 8,500 cubic feet of water per second. The net proceeds as hereinafter defined in Article thirty. -one (31) hereof, and as determined by the Secretary for each calendar year, from any power develop- ment which the District is hereunder authorized to make] shall be paid into the Colorado River Dam fund on March first of the next succeeding calendar year and be credited to the District can this contract until the District eYiall have paid thereby and/or otherwise an amount of money a^uivalent to that herein agreed to be paid to the United States? Thereafter such net power proceeds shall b4long to the District, It is agreed that in tho event the net power preceads in any ealendar'yearj 207 creditable to the District, shall exceed the annual installment of charges payable under this contract during the then current calendar year, the excess of such net power proceeds shall be credited on the next succeeding unpaid installment to be- come due from the District under this contract. Diversion and DeliverZ of Water for Ywn Pro ' e et Article 15. The District hereby consents that there be diverted at the Impe- rial Dam, and transported and delivered at Syphon Drop and/or such intermediate points as may be designated by the Secretary, the available water to which the Yuma project (situated entirely within the United States and not exceeding in area 120,000 acres plus lands lying between the project levees and the Colorado River as such levees were located in 1931) is entitled, not exceeding two thousand (2,000) second -feet of water in the aggregate, or such part thereof as the Secretary may direct, for the use and benefit of said project, including the development of power at Syphon Drop, such water to be diverted, transported and delivered continuously in so far as reasonable diligence will permit; provided, however, that wutur shrill notbo diverted, transported or delivered for the Yuma Project when the Secretary notifies' Imperial Irrigation District that said project for any reason may not be entitled thereto; provided, further, that there: may be diverted, transported and delivered such water in excess of requirements for irrigation or potable purposes, as determined by the Secretary, on the Yuma Project as so limited, only whan such water is not requirjd by the District for irrigation or potable purposes. The diversion, transportation and delivery of water for the Yuma Project as aforesaid shall be without expense to the United States or;its successors in control of said project, as to capital investment required to provide facilities for such diversion and transportation of:water except such checks, turnouts and other structures required for delivery, from said canal, 47v6 208 Contract of October 23j 1918 Article 16. That certain contract between the United States of America and Imperial Irrigation Districts bearing date of October 23, 1918, providing for a connection with Laguna Dam, having been terminated, except as to the provisions of Article nine (9) thereof, by said Imperial Contract, the District hereby consents to such partial termination of said first mentioned contract. The District hereby consents that there be furnished to the United States or its successors in interest in the control, operation and maintenance of,the Yuma Project, from any power development on the AllTAmerican Canal at or near Pilot Knob, up to but not to exceed four thousand horsepower of electrical energy for use by the agency in charge of project operations for irrigation and drainage pumping purposes and necessary incidental use on said Yuma Project, such power to be furnished at cost (including overhead and general expense) plus ten per cent; provided, however, that such power at or near Pilot Knob shall not be required to,be furnished except at such times as all power feasible of development at Syphon Drop or developed.elsewho re within a radius of 40 miles from the City of Yuma for the benefit of the Yuma Project is i being used for project operations as in this article specified. Delivery of Water by United States_ Article 17. The United States shall, from storage available in the reservoir created by Boulder Dam, deliver to or for the District, for the benefit of the lands under or that will be served from the All -American Canal in Coachella Valleyp now or, hereafter within the District and lying within the Coachella Service Area, herein- after defined, each year, at a point in the Colorado River immediately above Imperial Dam, so much water as may be necessary to supply the District a total quantity, including all other waters diverted for use within the: District from the Colorado River, in the amounts and with priorities in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief of the Division of Water Resources of they State of California, as followse ''18" 209 h411b (Subject to availability thereof for use in California under the Colorado River Compact and the Boulder Canyon Project Act): The waters of the Colorado River available for use within the State of Californiai under the Colorado River Compact and thv Boulder Canyon Project Act shall be apportioned to the respective interests below named and in amounts and with priorities therein named and set forth, as follows: Section 1. A first priority to Palo Verde Irrigation District for bene- ficial use exclusively upon lands in said District as it now exists and upon lands betwkjen said District and the Colorado River, aggregating (within and without said District) a gross area of 104,500 acncs, such waters as may be required by said lands. Section 2. A second priority to Yuma Project of the United States Bureau of Reclamation for beneficial use upon not exceeding a gross area of 25,000 acres of land located in said project in California, such waters as may be required by said lands. Section 31 A third priority (a) to Imperial Irrigation District and other lands under or that will be served from the All,American Canal in Imperial and Coachella Valleys, and (b) to Palo Verde Irrigation District for use exclu- sively on 16,000 acres in that area known as the "Lower Palo Verde Mesa," adjacent to Palo Verde: Irrigation District, for beneficial consumptive use, 3,850,000 acre-feet of water per annum less the bf'neficial consumptive use und(;r the priorities designated in Sections 1 and 2 above. The rights designated (a) and (b) in this section are equal in priority. The total beneficial con- sumptive use under priorities stated in Sections 1, 2 and 3 of this article shall not exceed 3,$50,000 acre feet of water p:;r annum. Section 4. A fourth priority to tho Metropolitan Water District of South- ern California and/or the: City of Los Angeles, for beneficial consumptive use, by'themselves and/or others, on the Coastal Plain of Southern California, 550,000 acre-feet of water perannum. Section 5. A _fifth priority (a) to The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and/or the City of Los Angeles, for beneficial consumptive use, by themselves and/or othars, on the Coastal Plain of Southern California, 550,000 acme -feet of water per annum and (b) to the City of San Diego grid/or County of San Diego, for beneficial consumptive use, 112,000 acre, -feet of water per annum. The rights designated'(a) and (b) in this section are; equal in priority. i Section 6. A sixth priority (a) to Imperial Irrigation District and other land under or that will be served f rora the All -American Canal in Imperial and Coachella Valleys, and (b) to Palo Verde Irrigation District for use exclusively on 16,000 acres in that -area known as the I'Lower Palo Verde Mesa," adjacent to Palo Verde :o±rigation District, for beneficial consumptive use, 300,000 acre- feet of water per annum. The rights designated (a) and (b) in this section or,., equal in priority, "19" 210 Section 7. A seventh priority of all remaining water available for use within California, for agricultural use in the Colorado River Basin in Califor- nia, as said basin is designated on Map No. 23000 of the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Section B. So far as the rights of the allottees named above are concerned, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and/or the City of Los Angeles shall have the exclusive right to .withdraw and divert into its aqueduct any water in Boulder Canyon Reservoir accumulated to the individual credit of said District and/or said City (not exceeding at any one time 4,750,000 acre- feet in the aggregate) by reason of reduced diversions by said District and/or said City; provided, that accumulations shall be subject to such conditions as to accurnul.ation, retention, release and withdrawal as the Secretary of the Interior may from time to time prescribe in his discretion, and his determina- tion thereof shall, be final; provided further, that the United States of America n,serves the right to „hake similar arrangements with users in other States without distinction in priority, and to determine the correlative rela- tions between said District and/or said City and such users resulting therefrom. Section 9. In addition, so far as tfia rights of the allottees named above are concerned, the City of San Diego and/or County of San Diego shall have the exclusive right to withdraw and diirDrt into an aqueduct any water in Boulder Canyon Reservoir accumulated to the individual credit of said City and/or said County (not exceeding at any one time 250,000 acre-feet in the aggregate) by r_,a.son of reduced diversions by said City and/or said County; provided, that accumulations shall be subject to such conditions as to accumul::Ltions, r~::,ten- tion, release and withdrawal as the Secretary of the Interior may from tirne to time prescribe in his discretion, and his determination thereof shall be final; provided further, that the United St,a.tcs of tim�)rica reserves the right to make similar arrangements with users in other States without distinction in priority, and to determine the correlative r-el=.tions between the said City and/or said County and such users resulting thor.:lifrorn. Scction 10. In no event shall the amounts allotted in this ;agreement to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and/or the City of Los Angeles be increased on account of inclusion of a supply for both said District �,.nd said City, and either or bc•:th may use said apportionments as may be agreed by and between said District and said City. Section 11. In no event shall the _mounts allotted in this agreement to the City of San Diego and/or to the County of San Diego be increased on account of inclusion of a supply for both said City and said County, and either or both may use said apportionments as may be agreed by and between said.City and said County. Section 12, The priorities hereinbefore set forth shall be in no wise affected by the relative dates of water contracts executed by the. Secretary of the Interior with the various parties. n The Secretary reserves the right to, and the District agrees that he may, con- tract with any of the allottoes above named in accordanco,with the above stated recommondaUon, 'or, in the event that such recommendation as to Palo Verde Irrigation -,20,. 211 District is superseded by an agreement between all the above allottees or by a final judicial determina.tion,.to contract with the Palo Verde Irrigation District in ac- cordance with such agreement or determination; Provided, that priorities numbered fourth and fifth shall not thereby be disturbed. The use of water by the District shall be in conformity to the following provi- sions of that -certain agreement executed between the District and Imperial Irrigation District dated February 14th, 1934, hereinabove in Article 4 (c) referred to to -wit: "Imperial Irrigation District shall have the prior right for °irrigation and potable purposes only, and exclusively~ for use in the Imperial Service Area, as hereinafter defined or hereunder modified, to all waters apportioned to said Imperial Irrigation District and other lands under or that will be served from the All -American Canal in Imperial and Coachella Valleys as pro- vided in the third and sixth priorities set out in the recommendation of the Chief of the Division of Water Resources of the State of California, as con- tained in Article 17 of the Imperial Contract. Subject to said prior right of Imp,v.rial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County `u;ater District shall have the next right, for irrigation and potable purposes only and exclusively for use in the Coachella Service Area, as horeinafter defined or hereunder modified, to all waters so apportioned to s,uid Imperial Irrigation District and other lands under or that will be served from the All -American Canal in the Imperial and Coachella Valleys, as provided in said third and sixth priorities. The use of water for _veneration of electric energy shall be, in all respects, secondary and subservient to all requirements of said two districts for irrigation and potable purposes as abov limited. As hereinabove; used, the term 'Imps. rial Service Area' shall comprise all lands within the boundaries of Imperial Irrigation District as said District was constituted on June 25, 1931, and all lands in Imperial and San Diego Counties, California, shown on Map marked Exhibit '-A', attached to said Impe- rdial Contract, and included within hatched border lines indicated on said map by legend as 'Boundary of Additional Areas in Proposed Enlarged Imperial Irrigation District', other than (a) such of said land:, as are labeled 'Dos PaLnas Area' and (b) such of said lands as lie West of Salton Sea and North of the Northerly boundary line of Township 11, South of the San Bernardino Base Line. The term 'Coachella Service Area' shall comprise all lands de- scribed on statements hereto attached and marked Exhibits 'B', 'C', 'D' and 'E', respectively," (said Exhibits "Bit, licit, "D" and "Eli being identical with Exhibits "Bit, licit) "D" and "Eli attached to this contract. between the District and the United States), "being approximately, but not exactly, the lands within said hatched border lines shown on said Exhibit ' A' y oth,:-:r than those included in said Imperial Service Area? Upon ,.,J.ication of dither District and with the written consent of the Secretary c..' Uw, Interior, the boundaries of the service area which such dis- trict :'A.s entitled hereunder to serve may at any time or from time to time be -21- 212 changed, but may not be so changed as, in the aggregate, to add more than 5000 acres to, nor to subtract more than 5000 acres from such set -rice ama, ` as herein defined, without the: written consent of the district entitled hereunder to serve the other service: area.,, As far as reasonable diligence will permit said water shall be delivered as ordered by the District, and as reasonably required for potable and irrigation pur- poses within said Coachella Service Area. This contract is for permanent water service but is subject to the condition that Boulder Dam and Boulder Canyon Reservoir shall be used; first, for river regulation, improvement of navigation, and flood control; second, for irrigation and domestic uses and satisfaction of perfected rights in pursuance of Article VIII of the Colorado River Compact; and third, for powers This contract is made upon the express condition and with the express covenant that the District and the United States shall observe and be subject to, and controlled by said Colorado, Fdve;r Compact, win the construction] management and operation of Boulder Dam, Imperial Dam, All -American Canal, and other works grid the storage, diver- sion, delivery and use of water for the generation of power, irrigation, and other purposes. The United States reserves the right to temporarily discontinue or reduce the amount of water to be delivered for the purpose of investigation, inspection, maintenance, repairs, replaeaments or installation of eouipment and/or machinery at Boulder Dam, but as far as feasible the United States will ,give the District reason- able notice in advance of such temporary discontinuance or reduction. The United States, its officers, agents and employees shall not be liable for damages when, for any reason whatsoever, suspension or m ductions in delivery of water occur, This contract is without prejudice to any other or additional rights which the District mr;y now have; not inconsistent with the fom going provisions of this article, or may hereafter acquire in or to the waters of the Colorado River: Subject to the provi- 4: Pions of Article fourteen (14) hereof, nothing in this contract shall be construed to prevent the; diversion by or for the District of water to the full Capacity heroin provided for it in the All -.American Canal if and when water over and above the "22" 213 quantity apportioned to it hereunder is available, and no power development at Imperial and/or Laguna Dam shall be permitted to interfere with such diversion by or for said District, but, except as provided in Article twerity-one (21) hereof, water shall not be diverted, transported nor carried by or through Imperial Dam or All - American Canal for any agency other than the District or Imperial Irrigation District, except by written consent of the Secretary. Measurement of Water Article 18. The water which the District receives under the apportionment'as provided in Article seventeen (17) hereof shall be measured at such point or points on the canal as may be designated by the Secretary. Measuring and controlling devices shall be furnished and in6talled by the United States as a part of the wont provided for herein, but shall be operated and maintained by and at the expense of the district, or districts, operating the works, They shall be and remain at all times under the complete control of the United States, whose authorized representa- tives may at all times have access to them over the lands and rights -of -sway of the District. Record of 16ater Diverted Article 19. The District shall rfaike full and complete written reports as directed by the Secretary, on forms to be supplied by the United States, of _U water diverted from tho Colorado river, and delivered to the District, and the dispo- sition thereof. The records and data .from which such reports are made shall be aceessibla to the United States on demand of the Secretary. Refusal of Water in Case of Dcfault Article 20. The United States reserves the right to infuse to deliver water to the District in��ha event of default for a poriod of more than twelve (12) months in any Payment due the United States under this contract, or in the discretion of the Secretary to reduce deliveries in such proportion as tha amount in.default by the -23-P 214 District bears to the total amount due$ It is und(-,rstood, however, that the provi- 1* sions of this article shall not relieve the District of its obligation hereunder to divert, transport and deliver water for the use and benefit of other agencies with whom the United States may contract for the diversion, transportation and delivery, of water Y through or b the works to be constructed under the terms hereof. The: United States further reserves the right to forthwith assume control of all or any part of the works to be constructed hereunder and to care for, operate and maintain the same, so long as the Secretary deems necessary or advisable, if, in his opinion, which shall be final and binding upon the parties hereto, the District does not carry out the M40 terms and conditions of this contract to their full extent and meaning. In such event,'the District's pro rata share: of the actual cost of such care, operation and } maintenance by the United States shall be repaid to the United States, plus fifteen per centum W%) to cover overhead and general expense, on March first of each year immediately succeeding the calendar year during which said works are operated and maintained by th0 United States. Nothing herein contained shall relieve the District of the obligation to pay in any event all installment, and penalties provided in Or this contract, Use of Works by the United States and Others Article 21. The United States also reserves the right to, and the District 4W agrees that it may, at any time prior to the transfer of constructed works to the District or Imperial Irrigation District for operation and maintenance! increase the opacity of such works and contract for such increased capacity with other agencies for the delivery of water for use in the United States; provided, however, that such # other agencies shall not thereby be entitled to participate in power development on said All-AmeriW Canal, except at points where and to the extent that the water diverted and/or carried for them contributes to the development of power• In the event other agencies thus contract with the United States, each of such agencies shall -24- 215 11 assume such proportion of the total cost of said works to be used jointly by such agency and the District, including Laguna Dam, as the Secretary may dete ,pine to be equitable and just but not less than the proportion that the capacity provided for such agency in such works bears to the total capacity thereof (except in that part thereof above Syphon Drop including Laguna Dam, in which part the proportion which such other agency shall assume shall be not less than the proportion that the capac- ity provided for such agency therein bears to the total capacity thereof less the capacity to be provided without cost to and for the Yuma Project) and the District s financial obligations under this contract shall be adjusted"accordingly. In no event shall construction costs chargeable to the District be increased by reason of additl.onal capacity being provided for any such agency or agencies or contract or contracts having been made with same, Any such agency thus contracting shall also be requirod to reimburse the District in such amounts and at such times as the Secre- tary may determine to be equitable and just for payments theretofore made by the District for the right to use Laguna Dam. Title to Remain in the United States Article 22. Title to the aforesaid Imperial Dam and All -American Canal shall be and remain in the United States notwithstanding transfer of the care, operation and maintenance thereof to said two districts, or either of them; provided, howeveri that the Secretary may, in his discretion, when repayment to the United States of all moneys advanced shall have been made,, transfer the title to said main canal and ap- purtenant structures, except the diversion dam and the main canal and appurtenant structures down to and including Syphon Drop, to the districts or other agencies of the United States having a beneficial interest therein in proportion to their re- spective eapii4 investments under such form of organization as may be acceptable to him, �25- 216 M Rules and Re ulations Article 23. There is reserved to the Secretary the right to prescribe and enforce rules and regulations not inconsistent with this contract governing the diver- sion and delivery of water hereunder to or for the District and to other contractors. Such rules and regulations may be modified, revised and/or extended from time to time after notice to the District and opportunity for it to be heard, as may be deemed proper, necessary or desirable by the Secretary to carry out the true intent and meaning of the law and of this contraot, or amendments thereof# or to protect the interests of the United States. The District hereby agrees that in the operation and maintenance of the Imperial Dam and All-Aw erican Canal, all such rules and regula- tions will be fully adhered to by it. Inspection by the United States Article 24. The Secretary may cause to be made from time to time a reasonable inspection of the works constructed by the United States to the end that he may ascertain whether the terms of this contract are being satisfactorily executed by the District. Such proportion of the actual expense of such inspection in any calen- dar year, as shall be found by the Secretary to be equitable and just, shall be paid by the District to the United States on March first of each year immediately followt ing the year in which such inspection is made, and upon statement to be furnished by the Secretary. The Secretary or his representative shall at all times have the right of ingress to and egress from all works of the District for the purpose of inspection, repairs and maintenance of works of the United States, and for all other purposes. Access to Books and Records Articlo1 25. The officials or designated representatives of the District shall have full and free access to the books and records of the United States, so far an they relate to the matters covered by this contraot, with the right at any time -26- 217 during office hours to make copies of and from the same; and the Secretary shall have :the same right in respect of the books and records of the District. Disputes or Disagreements Article 26, Disputes or disagreements as to the interpretation or performance of the provisions of this contract, except as otherwise provided herein, shall be determined either by arbitration or court proceedings, the Secretary being author- ized to act for the United States in such proceedings. Whenever a controversy arises out of this contract, and the parties hereto agree to submit the matter to arbitration, the District shall name one arbitrator and the Secretary shall name one arbitrator, and the two arbitrators thus chosen shall elect three other arbi- trators, but in the event of their failure to name all or any of the three arbitrators within thirty (30) days after their first meeting, -such arbitrators not so elected, shall be named by the Senior Judge of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The decision of any throe of such arbitrators shall be a valid and binding award of the arbitrators. Interest and Penalties Article 27. No interest shall be charged on any installments of charges due from the District hereunder except that on all such installments or any part thereof, which may remain unpaid by the District to the United States after the same become due, there shall be added to the amount unpaid a penalty of one-half of one per centum (I ) and a like penalty of one-half of one per centum (�-%) of the amount un- paid shall be added on the first day of each month thereafter so long as such default shall continue. Agreement Subject to Colorado River Compact Articl*v.28. This contract is made upon the express condition and with the express understanding that all rights based upon this contract shall be subject,to and controlled by the Colorado River. Crmpaet, being the compact or agreement signed -27- 218 at Santa It. New Mexico, November 24, 1922, pursuant to Art of Congress approved August 19, 1921, entitled "An Act to permit a compact or agreement between the States of Arizona, Californla. Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, respecting the disposition and'apportionment of the waters of the Colorado River, and for other purposes,'t which compact was approved by the Boulder Canyon Project Act. Application of edl&mation,Law Article 29, Except as provided by the Boulder Oanyon Project Act, the recla- mation law shall govern the construction, operation and maintenance of the works to I be constructed hereunder, Contract to be Authorized by Election and Confirmed by Court �- Article 30, The execution of this contract by the District shall be author- ized by the qualified electors of the District at an election held for that purpose. Thereafter, without delay, the District shall prosecute to judgment proceedings in court for a judicial confirmation of the authorization and validity of this contract, The United States shall not -be in any manner bound under the terms and conditions of this contract unleas and until a confirmatory final judgment in such proceedings shall have been rendered, including final decision, or pending appellate action if ground for appeal be laid. The District shall without delay and at its own cost ' and expense furnish the United States for its files, copies of proceedings relating to the election upon this contract and the confirmation proceedings in connection therewith, which said copies shall be properly certified by the Clerk of the Court in.which confirmatory judgment is obtained. Method of DoterminirV,, Net Power Proceeds Article 31. In determining; the net proceeds for each calendar year from any power development which the district is hereunder authorized to make, on tho All - American Canal, to be paid into the Colorado River Dam fund as provided in Article 2 f., 219 fourteen (14) hereof, there shall be taken into consideration all items of cost of production of power, including but not necessarily limited to amortization of and interest on capital investment in power development, replacements, improvements, and operation and maintenance, if any. Any other proper factor of cost not here expressly enumerated may be taken into account in determining the net proceeds. Contingent upon Appropriations Article 32. This contract is subject to appropriations or allocations being made by Congress or other Governmental financing authority from year to year of moneys sufficient to do the work provided for herein, and to thore being sufficient moneys available in the Colorado River Dam fund to permit allotments to be made for the performance of such work. No liability shall accrue against the United States, its officers, agents or employoes, by reason of sufficient moneys not being so appropriated nor on account of there not being sufficient moneys in the Colorado River Dam fund to permit of said allotments. If more than three years elapse after this contract becomes effeetivo.and before: appropriations or allocations are avail- able to per,nit the United States to make expenditures hereunder, the District may, at its option, upon giving sixty (60) days written notice to the Secretary, cancel this contract. Such option shall be expressed by vote of the electors of the Dis- trict with the same formalities as required for the authorization of contracts with the United States. Addition of Lands to District Article 33. (a) The District agrees to change its boundaries, subject to pre4 sentation to its Board of Directors before January 1, 1940, of lawful and sufficient petition or petitions therefor and the approval .of the electors, so as to add to th4 District and to its Improvement District No. 1 all lands lying within the Salton Area, referred to in Article 10 (d) hereof. (b) Whonever any of said lands within the Coachella Service Area are added to the DAntxi.ct, the Secretary, on behalf of the United States, hereby consents to -29- 220 such addition. Nothing contained in this contract shall impair any right or remedy of any person entitled to object r protest against the addition to the District of - any c o C any particular tract or tracts of land, nor impair the power of the Board to hear * and determine any such objections or protests. (c) Notwithstanding anything herein contained, the District may, at its option, change its boundaries to as to add to the District all or any part of the Dos Palmas Area, and/or of the Fish Springs Area, referred to in Article 10 (d) hereof. In the event any lands within said Dos Palmas Area or Fish Springs Area shall be added to the District such addition shall be made upon conditions substantially as herein- after contained and as and when authorized by law, and the Secretary on behalf of the United States hereby requires and consents to such conditions, to -Witt CONDITION NO. 1 Contribution to Ca ital Casts The lands within each Improvement District shall collectively bear that pro- portion of all costs of the imperial Dam, and All -American Canal, including Laguna Dam, herein agreed to be borne by the Districts which the area within such Improve- ment District bears to the total area of the Coachella Service Area from time to time within the District. CONDITION NO. 2 Contribution to Costs Paid by District Each Improvement District, other than Improvement District No. 1 shall bear, in the proportion set out in Condition No. 1, its share of all capital costs of the Imperial Dam and All -American Canal, including Laguna Dam, paid b7! the District prior to the first District -tax collection from the lands within such Improvement District and shall pay such share to the District in such installments and at such I times as shall be determined by resolution of the Board of Directors of the District to be just and equitable, Upon collection'of said sums by the District, the i -30- 221 portions of the Coachella Service Area.b y which said sums were originally paid shall thereupon be entitled to reimbursement or credit in such manner as may be deter- mined by said Board. CONDITION NO. 3 Dibtrib ution System Each improvement District shall bear the entire capital cost of any distri- bution system which may be constructed by or under the authority of the District to serve the lands within such Improvement District but shall not be required to bear any part of the capital cost of.any distribution system to serve the lands within any other Improvement District. CONDITION NO. 4 Taxation All charges hereunder to be borne by each Improvement District unless other- wise collected from the lands therein, shall be a part of but in addition to the annual taxes upon said lands for other District purposes and shall constitute an y additional annual charge upon said lands, to be levied upon an ad valorem or other basis as now.or hereafter provided by law. Rights Reserved under Section 3737 Revised Statutes Article 34. All rights of action for breach of any of the provisions of this contract are reserved to the United States as provided,in Section 3737 of the Revised Statutes of the United -States, Remedies Under Contract not Exclusive Article 35. Nothing contained in this contract shall be construed as in any I manner abridging, limiting or depriving the United States, the District or Imperial j Irrigation District of any means of enforcing any remedy either at law or in equity C for the breach of any of the provisions hereof which it would otherwise have. The waiver of a breach of any of the provisions of this contract shall not be deemed to I' -k- 222 F1 be a waiver, of any other provision hereof or of a subsequent breach of such provision. Interest in Contract not Transferable Article 36, No interest in this contract is transferable by the District to any other party, and any such attempted transfer shall cause this contract to become subject to annulment at the option of the United States. Member of Corlp�re_ss Clause Article 37. No Member of or Delegate to Congress or Resident Commissioner shall be admitted to any share or part of this contract, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom. Nothing, however, herein contained shall be construed to extend to this contract if made with a corporation for itr3 general benefit. Contract Void If Certain Lands Included in Imperial Irri c.,tion District Article 38. In the event lawful petition or petitions sufficient in all respects for inclusion within Imperial Irrigation District of ninety per centum (90f) of the lands shown.on said Exhibit "A" lying North of the Northerly boundary line of Township Eleven (11), South of the San Bernardino Base Line and bounded by the lines indicated on said Exhibit "A" as "Boundary of Additional Areas in Pro- posed Enlarged Imperial Irrigation District", exclusive of the Dos Palmas area and exclusive of Indian lands and public lands of the United States shall be filed pur- suant to and within the time limited by said Imperial Contract, and said lands shall be thereafter included within said Imperial Irrigation District pursuant to such petition or petitions, then, as of the date of such inclusion$ this contract shall terminate and be at an end, -32- 223 I 11 V WITNESS IMBREOF, the parties hereto have caused this contract to be axe- cuted the day and'year first above written. Attest: Secretary. THE UNITED STATES OF 94ERICA By Federal Emergency Administrator of Public Works and Secretary of the Interior. COACT ELLA VALLEY COUNTY IIATER DISTRICT By President. -33- 224 n n EXH.LBIT "Bit DESCRIPTION OF LANDS WITHIN COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND ITS IMPROVF21ENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND WITHIN THE COACHELLA SERVICE AREA. All that certain tract of land situate in the County of Riverside, State of California, and in the Townships (designated 'IT'S) hereinafter mentioned South, and Ranges (designated IIR") hereinafter mentioned East, of the San Bernardino Base Line and Meridian, particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the S.W. corner of the S.E. of Section 31, Township 8 South, Range 9 East, which is a point in the South boundary line of said Coachella Valley County Water District and thence along straight lines - 1. To the S.W. corner of Sec. 10, T. 8, R. 8, thence 2. To the S.W.'corner of the S.E. of Sec. 33, T. 7, R. 8, thence 3. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.4, of said See, 33, thence 4* To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of Sec. 19, T. 7, R. 8, thence 5. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.i of said Sec. 19, thence along the West line of said Sec. 19 6. To the N.W, corner of said Sec. 19, thence along the South line. of Sec. 13, T. 7, R. 7. 7. To the S.W. corner of said Sec. 13, thence along the West line'of said Sec. 13 8. To the N.W. corner of said Sec. 13, thence 9. To the S.W. Corner of the N.E.i of Sec. 11, T. 7, R. 7, thence _ 10, To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 11, thence along the West line of said Sec. 11 11. To the N.W. corner of said Sec. ll,'thence along the South line of Sec. 3 -1- 225 in said Township and Range 12, To the S.W. corner of said Sac. 3, thence along the West line of said Sec. 3 13. To the N.W.. corner of said Sec. 3, thence along the South line of Secs. 34 and 33, T. 6 South, R. 7 East 14, To the S.W. corner of the S.E.: of Sec. 33, T. 6, R. 7, thence 15, To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of Sec. 28, To 61 R. 7, thence 16. To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 28, thence 17. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of Sec. 20, T. 6, R. 7, thence 18. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 20, thence 19. To the S.W. corner of the S.E.1 of the N.W.1 of said Sec. 20, thence 20. To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of the N.W. of said Sec. 20, thence 21. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of Sec. 17j T. 6, R. 7, thence 22, To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of Sec. 81 T. 61 R, 7, thence 23. To the S.W.-corner of the S.E. of the N.W. of said See..82 thence 24. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of the N.W.J of said Sec. 8, thence 25. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.14 of the N.W. of said Sec. 8, thence 26. To the N-Wo corner of said Sec. 8, thence 27. To the N.W. cornor of the N.E.; of the N.E.l of Sec. 7, T. 6, R. 7, thence 28. To the S,W. corner of the N.E. of the N.E. of said Sec. 7, thence 29. To the S.W, corner of the N.E.` of the N.W. of said Sec. 7, thence 30. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the N.W. of said Sec. 7, thence 31. To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 7, thence along the West line of said Sec. 7 32. To the S.E,, corner of Sec, 1, T. 6, R. 6, thence along the South line of said Sec. 1 33• To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of said Sec. 1, thence -2- 226 34• To the N.W. Corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 1, thence along the North line I'; of said Sec. 1 35. To the S.W. corner of the S.E.1 of the S.E. of Sec. 36, T. 51 R. 6, thence 36. To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of the S.E. of said Sec. 36, thence 37. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of Sec. 31, T. 5, R. 7, thence 38. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of Sec. 19, T. 5, R. 7, thence 39. To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 19, thence 40. North along the West line of said T. 5, South to a point in the North - easterly line of the right-of-way of the State Highway commonly known as nU., S. High- way 9911, thence 41. Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of said right-of-way of'said Highway to the intersection of said line with the Vaesterly line of the E.j of Sec. 19, T. 4, R. 6, thence 42. To the N.W. corner of the S.E.3 of Sec• 3-81 T. 4, R. 6, thence 43. To the N.E. corner of the S.E.-of Sec. 15, T. 4, R. 6, thence 44. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.1; of Sec. 23, T. 40 R. 6, thence 45. To the N.E. corner of the S.E. of Sec. 24, T. 41 R. 6, thence 46. ' To the S. W. corner of the S.E.w of Sec. 34, T. 43 R. 7, thence 47• To the N.E. corner of Sec. 3, T. 51 R. 7, thence- 48. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.- of the N.W. of Sec. 2, T. 5, R. 7, thence 49. To the S.E. corner of the N*E.-4X of the N.W. of said Sec. 20 thence 50. To the S.W. corner/of the N.E,4 of said Sec. 2, thence 51. To the S.W. corner of the NX.4- of Sec. 1, T. 5, R. 7, thence 52. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of said Sec. f, thence 53. To the S.W. corner of Sec. 6, T. 51 R. 8, thence 54t To the S.W. corner of Sec. 15, T. 5, R. 8, thence along the West line of Sec. 221P T. 5, R♦ 8 55. To tb S.W. corner of said Sec. 22, thence -3- 227 56. To the S.W. corner of the S.E.; of Sec. 27, T. 5, R. 8, thence 57. To the S.W. corner of the N.VJ.� of the N.E. of Sec. 340 T. 5, R. 80 thence 58. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of the N.E.j of said See. 34, thence 59, To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of the S.E. of said Sec. 34, thence 60. To the S.E. corner of the N.E. of the S.E. of Sec. 340"T. 5, R. 8, thence along the East line of said Sec. 34 61. To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 34, thence along the North line of Sec. 2, T. 6, R. 8 62. To the N.E. corner of the N.W. of the N.V1.w of said Sec. 2, thence 63. To the S.E. corner of the N.W.4 of the N.W.w of said Sec. 2, thence 64. To the S.E. corner of the N.E. of the N.W.�'of said Sec. 21 thence 65. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 2, thence 66. To the N.E. corner of the N.W. of the S.E.J of said Sec. 2, thence 67. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of the S.E.1 of said Sec. 2, thence 68. To the S.E, corner of the N.E. of the S.E. of said Sec. 20 thence along the East line of said Sec. 2 69, To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 22 thence 70. To the S.E. corner of Sec. 13, 'T. 6, R. 8, thence 71, To the S.E. corner of Sec. 3, T. 7, R. 9, thence along the South lines of Sections 2 and 1 in said Township and Range 72. To the N.E. corner of the N.W.1 of the N.W. of Sec. 129 T. 7, R. 9, thence 73• To the S.E. corner of the N.WA of the N.W1 of said Sec. 12, thence 74. To the N.E. corner of the S.E.1 of the N.W. of said Sec. 12, thence 75, To the S*W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 12, thence 76. To the N.E, corner of the S.E. of said Sec'. 12, being a point on the East boundary line of said Coachella Valley County Water District, thence 77. South along said boundary line to the S.E. corner of Sec. 25, T. 7, R. 9, —4- 228 thence along the South lines of said Sec. 25 and of Sec. 26 in said Township and Range 78. To the S.VT. corner of said Sec. 26, thence 79, To the N.E. corner of the S.E.w of the S.E. of Sec. 27, T. 7, R. 9, thence 80, To the N,W, corner of the S.W.1 of the S,E.� of said Sec. 27, thence 81. To the N.E. corner of the S.W. of said Sec. 27, thence 82. To the N.14, corner of the S.W. of said Sec. 27, thence 83. To the N.E. corner of the S.E.w of the N.E. of Sec. 28, T. 7, R. 9, thence 84. To the N.W. corner of the S.W. of the N.E. of said Sec. 28, thence 85. To the N.E. corner of the.N,W.} of said Sec. 28, T. 7, R. 9, thence along the North lines of said Sec. 28 and of Sec, 29 in said Township and Range 86. To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 29, thence 87. To the S,W. corner of the N.W. of the N.E.1 of said Sec. 29, thence 1 f said Sec. 2 thence 88. To the N.W. corner of the S.E. of the N.W. 0 9, 89. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the N.W. of said Sec. 29, thence 90. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of the N.W. of Sec. 30, T. 7, R. 9, thence 91. To the S.E. corner of the N.W.1 of the N.W. of said Sec. 30, thence 92, To the S.W. corner of the N.E,�, of the N.E. of Sec. 25, T. 7, R. 8, thence 93. To the S.W. corner of the S.E. of the N.E.w of said Sec. 25, thence 94. To the S.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 25, thence 95. To the S.E. corner of the N.E,� of the S.W. of said Sec. 25, thence 96. To the N.E, corner of the S.W.v, of the S.W. of said Sec. 25, thence 97, To the S.E. corner of the S.W.1 of the N.W.�'of Sec. 36, T, 71 R. 8, thence 98. To the N.E. corner of the S.W. of said Sec. 360 thence 99. To the S.E. corner of the N.E.4 of the S.W. of said Sec. 36, thence 100. To the N.E. corner of the S.E,� of the S•Ef� of said Sec. 36, thence along the Bast line of said Sec. 36 —5� 229 101, To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 36, thence 102. To the N.E# corner of the N.77.� of the N.W.t of Sec. 6, T. 8, R, 9, thence 103. To the N.E. corner of the S.W. of the S.W.J of Sec. 79 T. 8, R. 92 thence 104. To the N.Vi,, corner of the S.W. of the S.W. of said Sec. 7, thence along the West lines of said Sec. 7 and of Sec. 18 in said Township and Range 105,. To the S.ti'J.•corner of the N.W. of the N.W. of said Sec. 180 thence 106,. To the. S.E. corner of. the N.W,� of'the N.W.�.of said Sec. 18, thence 107• To the S.E,.corner of the S.W. of the N.W,of said Sec. 182 thence 108., To the S.E. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 18p thence 109• To the S.E. corner of the N.Ei of the S.W.J of said Sec. 18, thence 110. .To the N.E. corner of the S.E.�'of the S.i.� of said Sec. 18, thence along the East lines of said Sec. 18 and of Sec. 19 in said Township and Range 11i. To the S.W. corner of the N,W.�, of the N,W* of Sec. 20, T. 8, R. 9.. • thence 112. To the N.E. corner of the S.W.�,'of the N.W. of said Sec. 20, thence 113. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the N.h. of said Sec. 20, thence A4. To the S.E. corner of the N.E.}r of said Sec. 20, thence 115. To the N.W. corner of the S.W., of the S.W. of Sec. 21, T. 81 R. 9,, thence 116. To the N.E. corner of the S,W.� of the S.W. of said Sec. 21, thence 1176 To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the S.W. of said Sec. 21, thence 118, To the N.E.. corner of the N,Wo. , of See. 28, T. 8, R. 9, thence* 119. To the S.E. corner of the N.Wj of said Sec. 28, thence . 120. To the N.E. corner of the N.W. of the S.E. of said Sec. 28, thence 121. To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of the N.E,� of Sec. 33, T. 80 R. 91 thence along; the North line of s%id Sec, 33 122. To the N.E, corner of said Sec, 33, thence along the East line of said �� 230 Sec. 33 123. To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 33, being a point in the Southerly bound— ary line of said Coachella Valley County Water District and of said County of k. Riverside, thence ring. 124. West along said District and Cotuity boundary lines to the point of begin - ~?- 231 EXHIBIT 11C" DESCRIPTION OF LANDS OUTSIDE COACHr.LLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE COACHW A SERVICE AREA, DESIGNATED THE SALTON AREA. All that certain tract of land situate in -the County of Riverside, State of California, and in the Townships (designated 'IT") hereinafter mentioned South, and Ranges (designated "R") hereinafter mentioned East, of the San Bernardino Ease Line g and Meridian, particularly described as follows, to wit; Beginning at the Noll. corner of Section 18, Township 7 South, Range 10 East, which is a point in the East boundary line of said Coachella Valley County Water Dis— trict, and running thence along the Northerly boundary lines of said Section 18 and of Section 17 in said Township and Prange; 1► To the N.E. corner of Sec. 17, T. 7, R'. 10, thence 2. To the N.W. corner of Sec. 26, T. 7, R. 10, thence 3. To the S.W. corner of the S.l±.�, of the S.E. of said Sec. 26, thence k. To the S.W. corner of the N.'d;.� of Sec. 36, T. 7, R. 10, thence 5• To the S.E. corner of said Sec. 36, thence 6. To the S.E. corner of Sec. 6, T. 8, R. 11, thence 7. To the S.W► corner of the S.E. of said Sec. 6, thence 8. To the S.E. corner of the N.W. of Sec. 7, T. 8, R. 11, thence 9. To the S.W. corner of the S.E►I, of the N.W. of said See. 7, thence 10. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the S.W.; of said Sec. 7, thence ll► To the N.E. corner of the N.W. of Sec. 18, T. 81 R. 11, thence 12. To the S.E. corner of the N X-1 of said Sec. 180 thence 13. Along the Southerly line of t1le IJ.Vf.� of said Sec* 18, and the Westerly —l- 232 projection of said Southerly line to an intersection with the Northeasterly line of the Southern Pacific main line railroad right-of-way running through the N.Z., of See. 13, T. 82 R, 10, thence 14. Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of said railroad right-of-way to the intersection of said Northeasterly line with the South line of Sec. 280 T. 70 R. 10, or the Easterly projection thereof, thence along the Southerly lines of said Sec. 28 and of Sec. 29 and Sec. 30 in said Township and Range,, 15, To the S.W. corner of said Sec. 30, being a point in the East boundary -line of said Coachella Valley County Water District, thence 16. North along said District boundary line to the point of beginning. 9 0 " 2m 233 EXHIBIT 11Du DESCRIPTION OF LANDS OUTSIDE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE COACHELLA SERVICE AREA, DESIGNATED THE DOS PALMAS AREA. All that certain tract of land situate in the Counties of Riverside and Imperial, State of California, and in the Townships (designated 'IT") hereinafter mentioned South, and Ranges (designated 1IR'I) hereinafter mentioned East, of the San Bernar- 1�dino Base Line and Meridian, particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the S.E. corner of Sec. 33, T. 8 South, R. 12 East, which is a point in the Southerly boundary line of said County of Riverside, and running thence along the Easterly boundary line of said Sec. 33: 1. To the N.E. corner of the S.E� of the S.E.k of said Sec. 33, thence 2. To the N.W* corner of the Sq?,QY of the S.E. of said Stec. 33, thence 3. To the N.E. corner of the S.W.J; of said Sec. 33, thence 4. To the S.W. corner of the S.EJ of the N.W.1 of said Sec. 33, thence 5. To the N.E. corner of the S.M,, of the N.W.J- of said Sec. 33, thence 6. To the S.W. corner of the N.W.1 of the N.E. of Sec. 32, T. 8i R. 12, thence 7. To the N.W. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 32, thence 8. Along the Northerly line of said Sec. 32 to the N.W. corner of the N.E. of the N.W. of said Sec. 32, thence 9. To the N.E. corner of the S.W.1 of the S.W. of Sec. 29, T. 8, R. 12, thence 10. To the N X. corner of said S.W.4 of the S.W.1 of said See. 29, thence 11, Along the Westerly boundary line of said Sec. 29 to the Nell. corner of the S.W. of said Sec. 29, thence 12. To the S.W. corm r of the N.F.1 of ^oe. 30, T. 8, R. 12, thence -1- u 234 13. To the N?E, corner of the N.W.-I of said Sec. 300 thence 14. Along the Northerly boundary line of said Sec. 30 to the N.Vds corner of said Sec. 30, thence 15. Along the westerly boundary line of Soc. 19, T. 8, R. 12, to the N.W. cor- ner of said Sec. 19, thence 16. Along the Southerly boundary line of Sec. 13, T. 8, R. 11, to the S.W. cor- ner of the S.E,w of the S,E.} of said Sec. 13, thence I 17. To the N.W. corner of the S.E. of the N.E. of Sec. 129 T. 80 R. 119 thence 18, To the N,E, corner of the S.E. of the; N.F.. of Sec. 71 T. 84 R. 12, thence 19, Along the Easterly boundary line of said Sec, 7 to the S.E. corner of said Sec. 7, thence 20. �o the S.E. corner of Sac. 17, T. 8, Re 12, thonce 21. Along the Westerly boundary line of Sec. 21, T. 8, R. 12, to the S.W. cor- ner of the N,W,� of said Section, thence 22, To the N.E. corner of the Sellej of said Sec. 21, thence 23. To the NoW. corner of the S.T"J.1 of the S.E.J of said Sec. 210 thence 24. To the N.E. corner of the S.E. of the S.E.l of said Sec. 21, thence 25, Along the Easterly boundary line of said Sec. 21 to the S.E.corner of said Sec. 21, thence 26. Along the Northerly boundary line of Sec. 27, T. 8, R. 12, to the N.E. eor- ,X the N.W. of said Sec. 27, thence 27, To the S.E. corner of Sec. 26, T. 81 R. 12, thence 28. Along a straight line between the N.V. corner and the S.E. corner of See. 36, T. 8, R. 12, to a point where said straight line intersects a projection Northerly of the East line of Sec. 2, T. 9, R. .12, thence 29. Along said last-named proj;icted 7.ine and the East line of said Sea. 2 to -2- 235 the S.E. corner of the N.E. of said Sec. 2, thence 30. To the S.W. corner of the N.E.1 of said Sec. 2, thence 31. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of said Sec. 2, thence 32. Along the Southerly boundary line of said Sec. 2 to the S.W. corner of the S.E.1 of the S.W. of said Sec. 2, thence 33 • To the S.E corner of the N.W•� of the N.W. of Sec. 11, T. 9, R. 129 thence 34. To the S.W. corner of the N.W. of the N.W.J� of Sec. 10, T. 9, R. 12, thence 35. Along the Vilest line of Sec. 10 to the N.W. corner of said Sec. 10, thence 36. Along the South line of Sec. 40 T. 9, R. 12, to the S.W. corner of the S.E. of the S.E.- of said Sec. 4, thence 37. To the N.W. corner of the S.E. of the S.E. of said Sec. 4, thence 38. To the S,W. corner of the Njl,. , of the S.E. of said Sec. 4, thence ' 39. To the N.W* corner of the N.E.1 of said Sec. 4, being a point in the South— erly boundary line of said County of Riverside, thence 40. Along said boundary line and the Northerly boundary line of said Sec. 4 to the point of beginning. 236 EXHIBIT nEn DESCRIPTION OF LANDS OUTSIDE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE COACHELLA SERVICE AREA, DESIGNATED THE FISH SPRINGS AREA All -that certain tract of land situate in the County of Imperial, State of California, and in the Townships (designated 'IT") hereinafter mentioned South,'and hanges (designated "R") hereinafter mentioned Fast, of the San Bernardino Base Line and Meridian, particularly described as follows, to —wit: Beginning at the N.E. corner of the N.W. of See- 4, T. 9, R. 9, Which is a point in the South boundary line of Coachella Valley County Water District and of the County of Riverside and the North Boundary line of the County of Imperial and run— ning thence along said boundary linal and along the Northerly boundary lines of said Sec. 4 and of Sec. 5, T. 9, R. 9= 1. To the N.E. corner cf the N.W.} of the N.W. of said Seq. 5, thence 2. To the S.E. corner of the S.W. of the N.W.=mf Sec. 8, T. 99 R. 9, thence 3. To the S.E. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 8, thence 4. To the S.E. corner of the S.W4 of said Sea, 8, thence 5. To the S.E. corner of Sec. 17, T. 9, Re 9, thence 6. 'To the S.E. corner of Sec. 212 T. 92 R. 9, thence 7. To the S.W. corner of Sec. 12, T. 100 R. 9, thence 8. Along the Southerly boundary line of said Sec. 12 to the S.E. corner of said Seo. 12, thence 9• To the S.E. corner of Sec. 6, T. 10, R. 10, thence 10. To tha N.E. corner of the N.W. of said Sec. 6, thence 11. To the Sell. corner of the N.E.j of the N.E.j of Sec. 16, T. 90 R. 9, thence 237 rl- J � 12 To the N.. corner of the N.W. of tha.S.E.� of Soo. 49 To 9, R. 99 thence �3. To the S,we corner of the'N-Eii of said See. 4jo thence to the point of beginning. q 239 1.1P Ir ei y Z7_-Mg Not. W"�km 7,04 all AW dlW I map_ DOPUDJA & WELLS CONSULTING 6789 QUAIL HILL PARKWAY, IRVINE, CA 92603 WWW.DOPUDJAWELLS.COM ----�7 ME 4" xie PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLACEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS ON THE FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 PROPERTY TAX ROLL RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution approving placement of public nuisance abatement assessments on the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Property Tax Roll. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Code Compliance must abate properties that are considered a public nuisance after the property owner fails to voluntarily clean their property. • The City may recover cost associated with the abatement. If the property owner fails to reimburse the City, a tax assessment may be placed on the property. • Council must hold a public hearing and solicit public comment in support or opposition prior to assessing properties. FISCAL IMPACT The City may recover $21,347.50 in abatement expenses; funds received will be deposited into the General Fund, Account No. 101-0000-42701 Lot Abatement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS La Quinta Code Compliance Division is responsible for monitoring the condition of properties within the City. In some cases, if properties are not well maintained, they are declared a public nuisance, due to overgrown vegetation, trash, or other unsafe conditions. The property owner is notified by a notice posted at the location and by mail. The notice allows the property owner to act and bring the property up to city standards. If the owner fails to respond and the conditions at the property don't improve, the City may secure a contractor to abate the property. Once the abatement work is completed, the City may request reimbursement for the cost of the abatement. If the owner does not reimburse the City within 30 days, the property is subject to a special tax assessment. 241 Listed below are ten properties that were abated by the City and the costs have not been recovered. Therefore, staff requests Council's approval to place assessments on these properties to recover the cost of abatement, plus a 25% administration fee. Riverside County will collect the assessment and reimburse the City. Assessor Parcel Cost of Administrative Name Number Abatement Fee Total BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 773-075-003 $2,500.00 $625.00 $3,125.00 BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 764-240-021 $2,800.00 $700.00 $3,500.00 CADO LA QUINTA 764-460-043 $640.00 $160.00 $800.00 CHRISTINE F CLARKE / STEPHEN C COLLETT / STEVEN POPELAR 600-340-047 $3,243.00 $810.75 $4,053.75 CHRISTINE F CLARKE / STEPHEN C COLLETT / STEVEN POPELAR 600-340-046 $3,702.00 $925.50 $4,627.50 HAGLUND W T / HAGLUND RUBY A 773-131-017 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 KENNETH D SMITH 773-163-015 $250.00 $62.50 $312.50 SIENNA CORP 600-052-009 $300.00 $75.00 $375.00 STAMKO DEV CO 600-340-029 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 STAMKO DEV CO 600-340-029 $3,243.00 $810.75 $4,053.75 Total $21,347.50 AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Hearing Notice A public hearing notice was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 21, 2023 (Attachment 1). ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to assess these properties or reduce the assessment amount. Prepared by: Martha Mendez, Public Safety Deputy Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Public Notice — Desert Sun published July 21, 2023 242 RESOLUTION NO. 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, PLACING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX ROLLS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE WHEREAS, Chapter 11.72 of the La Quinta Municipal Code provides for the declaration and determination of certain conditions of property to be a public nuisance and further provides for the abatement of said nuisance by certain procedures including abatement by the City and collection of the cost of said abatement on tax rolls via a special assessment; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said abatement procedures, the Public Safety Deputy Director of the City of La Quinta, as agent of the City Manager, has determined that a public nuisance exists on the following described premises, and has given the notice required by law, and the owner thereof has failed to appeal said determination and has failed to abate said nuisance as required in said notice; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said abatement procedure, the Public Safety Deputy Director has, by contract, provided for the abatement of said public nuisance on said properties and has filed a report thereon with the City Council; and WHEREAS, on the 1st day of August 2023, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did hold a duly noticed public hearing on said report and a special assessment of said costs against said properties, and upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, if any, the City Council did approve said report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that the City has abated a public nuisance on each of the following described premises, and on August 1st, 2023, held a duly noticed public hearing on special assessment of the costs of said abatement in the time and manner as required by law and further determines that there were no objections or protests to special assessment of said costs by any interested party. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and orders that the report of the Public Safety Deputy Director relative to special assessment of costs is hereby approved and the City Council hereby orders that the following costs are hereby placed as a special assessment against the following properties and the amount of said special assessments shall be collected at the time and in the manner of ordinary property taxes. 243 Resolution No. 2023 - xxx Fund Number 101-6004-60120/Nuisance Abatement Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Name Assessor Parcel Number Cost of Abatement Administrative Fee Total BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 773-075-003 $2,500.00 $625.00 $3,125.00 BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 764-240-021 $2,800.00 $700.00 $3,500.00 CADO LA QUINTA 764-460-043 $640.00 $160.00 $800.00 CHRISTINE F CLARKE / STEPHEN C COLLETT / STEVEN POPELAR 600-340-047 $3,243.00 $810.75 $4,053.75 CHRISTINE F CLARKE / STEPHEN C COLLETT / STEVEN POPELAR 600-340-046 $3,702.00 $925.50 $4,627.50 HAGLUND W T / HAGLUND RUBY A 773-131-017 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 KENNETH D SMITH 773-163-015 $250.00 $62.50 $312.50 SIENNA CORP 600-052-009 $300.00 $75.00 $375.00 STAMKO DEV CO 600-340-029 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 STAMKO DEV CO 600-340-029 $3,243.00 $810.75 $4,053.75 $21,347.50 SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of the Resolution to the tax collector of the County of Riverside and said tax collector is hereby requested to collect the amount of each special assessment herein at the time and in the manner of ordinary property taxes. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 1 st day of August 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 244 Resolution No. 2023 - xxx Fund Number 101-6004-60120/Nuisance Abatement Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 245 ATTACHMENT 1 4 Qwkra . - MIA 0/du DFSE RT - CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL No TzcE OF PUBLzc HEM RZN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City cf La Quinta City Council will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on AUGUST 1, 2023, at 5.00 p.m. in the La Quinta City Hall Council Chamber, 7,3495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, pursuant, to La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 11.72 on the following ttern: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR THE PURPOSES OF LOT CLEANING AND NUISANCE ABATEMENT The purpose of the hearing is to hear and consider all testimony, objections, and protests, if any, to the report fled with the City Council containing a description of each parcel of real property far the lot cleaning and nuisance abatement as listed in the tahle betow: These parcels will be assessed on the 2023/2024 fiscal year tax roll for the La Quinta Public Safety Department who completed the lot cleaning and nuisance abatement. A copy of said report upon which the Public Hearing will be held is on file and available for public inspection in the City Clerk's Office, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at City Hall, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California; requests to view may also be submitted via email at Cit)fClerkMail@LaQuintaCA.gov Assessor Parcel Cost of Administrative Name Number ► batement Fee Total BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 773-075-003 $2,500.00 $625.00 $3,125.00 BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 764-240-021 $2,800.00 $700.00 $3,500.00 CADC LA QUINTA 764-460-043 $640.00 $160,00 $800.00 CHRISTINE F CLARKE ! TEPHEN C COLLETT I STEVEN PDPELAR 500-340-047 $3,243,00 $810.75 $4,053.75 CHRISTINE F CLARKE I STEPHEN C COLLETT I STEVEN PDPELAR 600-340-046 $3,702.00 $925.50 $4,627.50 HAGLUND W T I HAGLUND RUBY A 773-131-017 $200.00 S50.00 $250.00 KENNETH D SMITH 773-163-015 $2 0-00 $02.50 $312.50 SIENNA CORP 600-052-009 $300-00 $75.00 $375.00 STAMKO DEV CO 5CO-340-029 $200,00 $50,00 $250.00 STAMKO DEV CO 500-340-029 $3,243.00 $81175 $4.053.75 $21,347.50 Any person may submit written comments on the contemplated action listed above to the attention of City Cleric Monika Radeva prior to the Public Hearing aridfor may appear and be heard in support of, or opposition to the special assessments at the time of the Public Hearing. If you challenge the decision of the action listed above in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues that you or someone else raised either at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Clerk's Office at *e address or email provided above, at or, prior to the Public Hearing_ The public comment period continues from the date of this notice through the Public Hearing. For more information contact the City Clerk's office at (760) 777- 7035_ In the City's efforts to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilitles Act 1990, the City requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance, or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. PUBLISH ONCE ON JULY 21, 2023 246 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 1, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (EA 2022-0001) AND APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022- 0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT2022-0001 FOR A 252-UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2022-0001. • Adopt a resolution to approve General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2) and Site Development Permit 2022-0001 for the La Quinta Village Apartments, consisting of 252 units located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The project site is located on a vacant parcel on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, the site of the previously approved La Paloma project (Attachment 1). The Applicant is requesting entitlement approval for a 252-unit apartment project which would include 178 market -rate units and 74 moderate -income affordable units. The project would include site improvements such as landscaping, utility infrastructure, covered parking, clubhouse, pool, spa, barbeque areas, putting course, pickleball court, and dog park. • The project was heard by the Planning Commission (Commission) on March 28 and June 27, 2023. The Commission recommended adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), and a favorable recommendation for the General Plan Amendment (GPA), which requires a super -majority of the Commission, or at least 4 affirmative votes for a 7-member Commission was not received since the GPA received only 3 affirmative votes; therefore, there is no recommendation to approve the GPA, Specific Plan (SP), and Site Development Permit (SDP). The vote was 3 yes, 2 no (1 recused, 1 excused absence). FISCAL IMPACT — None 247 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Applicant is proposing the La Quinta Village Apartments: a 252-unit, multifamily apartment project on the site, which would include 178 market -rate units and 74 moderate - income affordable units. The project would include site improvements such as landscaping, utility infrastructure, covered parking, clubhouse, pool, spa, barbeque areas, putting course, pickleball court, and dog park. The project is located on a 14.03-acre vacant parcel, bordered by a residential community to the north, Washington Street to the west, vacant land to the east, and Avenue 50 to the south. Development on the project site was previously approved under La Paloma SP 2004-071 on December 7, 2004, for a multi -unit senior community with independent living, assisted living and memory care units. The La Paloma SP is currently effective for the project site. The current General Plan designation for the site is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential); zoning for the site is RMH (Medium High Density Residential). Each of the project's applications is described individually below, in the procedural order in which they must be considered. General Plan Amendment The project site is identified on the City's inventory of sites in its Housing Element to accommodate 280 residential units in the very low- and low-income categories. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65863 (commonly referred to as the state "No Net Loss Law"), a jurisdiction must maintain adequate sites to accommodate its remaining unmet regional housing need allocation (RHNA) by each income category. If a jurisdiction approves a development of a parcel identified in its Housing Element sites inventory with fewer units, per income category, than shown in the Housing Element, it must either make findings that the Housing Element's remaining sites have sufficient capacity to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA by income level or identify and make available sufficient sites to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA for each income category. The City is responsible for compliance with the No Net Loss Law, unless a project applicant requests in his or her initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the housing element not being adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing. While the project includes 74 moderate -income units and 178 market - rate units, the project does not include units in the very low -and low-income categories. Therefore, the Applicant must identify additional site(s) that could accommodate 280 very low -and low-income units. This requires a GPA to add another site to the inventory of sites in the Housing Element. The Applicant has identified an additional site, a 12.74-acre property identified as Site 6 on the draft Housing Element amendment (Attachment 2). Site 6 is located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive and is in a Community Commercial zone that also has the Affordable Housing Overlay and Mixed Use Overlay, which allows for mixed use development - both multifamily residential and commercial development (Attachment 4). The Affordable Housing Overlay allows for a density of up to 30 units per acre and the Mixed Use Overlay allows for mixed use projects up to 24 units per acre. At 248 280 units, Site 6 would have a density of 22 units per acre, which is consistent with other affordable housing developments in the region. This site is within a "High Resource" area, in that it is immediately adjacent to schools, is in close proximity to businesses on Highway 111 and on Washington Street, and close to job areas which provides for economic opportunities. If the GPA is approved, including the project as proposed, the City would then re -submit its Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for re -certification. This project is conditioned to not move forward with construction until and unless HCD has approved the amendment to the Housing Element. Density Bonus The project is proposing 74 units to be designated for moderate -income households, as defined by the City's Density Bonus Section of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), found at https:Hlibrary.municode.com/ca/la quinta/codes/municipal code?node1d=TIT9ZO CH9.60SURERE 9.60.260DEBOAFHO, which was recently revised to be consistent with current state density bonus law. With 74 moderate income designated units, the project is allowed a 50% density bonus, which would allow for a total of 252 units on the Site. Per the LQMC, a condition would be placed for the project to enter into an agreement with the City to ensure that 74 units are reserved for moderate -income occupants. The agreement ensures continued affordability for a period of 55 years or longer; such agreement shall run with the land, shall be binding upon all successors in interest of the applicant, and shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder. Specific Plan The project requires an amendment of the current La Paloma SP to reflect the proposed project (Exhibit C to proposed Resolution). The La Paloma SP contains detailed development principles, guidelines, and programs to facilitate the development of a multi- unit senior housing community. The amended SP (SP 2022-0001) would supersede the La Paloma SP and would detail the development principles, standards, guidelines and use standards for the new La Quinta Village Apartments project. The amended SP establishes some development standards that differ from the LQMC zoning standards, including: • Maximum structure height of 28 feet (ft) within 150 ft of image corridor (Washington Street and Avenue 50); current zoning limits the maximum structure height at 22 ft within 150 ft of image corridor. • Maximum three stories; current zoning limits maximum number of stories to two. • Carports allowed within front yard setback; current zoning does not allow any structures, including carports, within front yard setback. • Minimum livable area of 670 square feet (sf); current zoning requires a minimum livable area of 750 sf. • Allowance of fencing and retention basins within perimeter landscape setbacks; current zoning does not allow fencing or retention basins within setback. 249 SP and current zoning standards are provided in the table below for comparison. Standard Specific Plan Medium High Density Zone Minimum Project Size for Multi -Family Projects 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Minimum Frontage for Multi -Family Projects 100 ft 100 ft Maximum Structure Height 40 ft 28 ft Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 28 ft 22 ft Maximum Number of Stories 3 2 Minimum Front Yard Setback 20 ft 20 ft Minimum Interior/Exterior Side Yard Setback 5/10 ft 5/10 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 ft 15 ft Minimum Garage Setback 5 ft 25 ft Maximum Lot Coverage 60% 60% Minimum Common Open Area 30% 30% Minimum/Average Perimeter Landscape Setback 10/20 ft 10/20 ft Minimum Livable Area 670 sf 750 sf These different standards are allowed with approval of the SP. Projects with affordable housing incorporated are allowed several concessions from the LQMC but the project is proposing for these additional standards to occur within the SP and are not requesting any concessions. All other development standards as they relate to setbacks, heights, lighting standards, open space requirements, and requirements for multi -family projects have been met, including a minimum 75 ft setback from their eastern property line to meet a setback requirement from the Coachella Valley Water District's stormwater channel. Site Development Permit The SDP covers the site, architectural, and landscaping design of the project (Attachment 3). The units are proposed to be housed in 11 buildings throughout the project site: seven and half of the buildings are two-story, and three and half of the buildings are three-story. The two-story buildings are proposed at a height of 28 ft 6 inches (in) and the three-story buildings are 38 ft 6 in. Five of the two-story buildings are positioned on the north side, adjacent to the existing residential development, and are set back at distances of 89 ft, 90 ft, 91 ft, and 72 ft from the northern property line, which exceeds the zoning code requirements for separation of two-story projects from one-story residential. The two buildings on the south side, adjacent to Avenue 50, are two stories. All three-story buildings are positioned in the central portion of the site. A breakdown of the 252 total units is as follows: • Total of 166 units are one (1) bedroom units o 60 are 673 sf, 106 are 755 sf • Total of 86 units are two (2) bedroom units: o All are 960 sf 250 'arking The Project includes a total of 520 parking spaces, which is a ratio of 2.03 spaces per unit. Of these, 396 are covered by carport or garage. The carports and garages are at a maximum height of 11 ft and incorporate architecture to match the rest of the development. Drawings are included in Attachment 3 which show the line of sight from the residences to the north towards the north side of the project site where garages are located. Per LQMC Density Bonus Section and state housing law, the total number of parking spaces required for this Project would be 295 parking spaces, after applying a by -right parking incentive for an affordable housing project (one space per one -bedroom unit, 1.5 spaces per two -bedroom unit). The project exceeds the minimum parking requirements. luildinq Desiqn and Amenitie, The architectural style is a contemporary Mediterranean design. Architectural elements include trellises on second and third floors to reduce massing and arches, recessed niches, and crown moulding with stucco finish. The color palette consists of earth tones, and incorporates blues, grays, and purples as accents. The project's recreational amenities include community pool, clubhouse, cabanas, five (5) barbeque areas, spa, fire pits, a putting course, pickleball court, a dog park and open space throughout. Landscaping Landscaping is proposed throughout the project site, including along Washington Street and Avenue 50, and described within the SP. The proposed preliminary landscaping plant palette incorporates typical desert compatible species such as Mulga and Tipu trees, date palms, agaves, and yellow bells (Attachment 4). The perimeter walls along Washington Street and Avenue 50 are proposed to be six-foot block walls with landscaping along the walls to break up the appearance to add variety. Traffic Circulation/Traffic Impact The project takes access from both Washington Street and Avenue 50, with right in/right out access off both streets. The Applicant provided a Traffic Impact Analysis (Analysis), which considered 252 apartment units. The most recent traffic counts were taken on March 30, 2023. The Analysis was reviewed by City of La Quinta staff, including the City's Traffic Engineer, and a summary follows below. The project is estimated to generate 1,556 total daily trips, including 108 AM peak trips and 125 PM peak hour trips. The revised Analysis included the following intersections: • Washington Street and Avenue 50 • Washington Street and Sagebrush Avenue • Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive • Washington Street and Avenue 48 • Moon River Drive/Park Avenue and Avenue 50 The revised Analysis concluded that all analyzed intersections would operate at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS), except Moon River Drive/Park Avenue and Avenue 50, under 251 project completion conditions (existing traffic plus estimated traffic from ambient growth and the project) and cumulative conditions (existing traffic plus traffic from ambient growth, nearby projects that are being proposed, and the project). The deficient condition at the Moon River Drive/Park Avenue and Avenue 50 intersection is existing due to morning school traffic. A roadway segment analysis was also included in the revised Analysis. The following roadway segments were studied: • Washington Street, north of Avenue 50 • Washington Street, south of Avenue 50 • Avenue 50, west of Washington Street • Avenue 50, east of Washington Street The revised Analysis shows that all analyzed roadway segments would have adequate capacity under project completion conditions (existing traffic plus estimated traffic from ambient growth and the project) and cumulative conditions (existing traffic plus traffic from ambient growth, nearby projects that are being proposed and the project). The roadway capacities along these streets are consistent with General Plan buildout capacity. The project would not significantly impact traffic operations in the area. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Planning Commission Review The Applicant presented a 284-unit apartment project to the Commission on March 28, 2023, which included entitlement requests for a General Plan Amendment to revise the City's Housing Element, a Zone Change to increase the density, a Specific Plan Amendment to amend the La Paloma Specific Plan, and a Site Development Permit for project site design. The Commission requested the applicant revise the project based on concerns regarding: • Architectural design • Density and height of buildings • Parking • Traffic The Applicant submitted a revised proposal, which was considered by the Commission at their June 27, 2023 meeting, and included the following revisions: • Name change to La Quinta Village Apartments. Reduced number of units from 284 to 252. Zone Change request removed because density of 252 units is consistent with existing Residential Medium High (RMH) zoning, with a density bonus. 252 • Seven of the 11 residential buildings were originally proposed at three stories. Three buildings are reduced to two stories and one building to half three stories and two stories. This results in three and a half of the 11 buildings at three stories. • Parking count (520 spaces) remains the same as before but with reduced numberof units, the ratio changes from 1.8 spaces per unit to 2 spaces per unit. • Revised traffic study with updated traffic counts and updated analysis due to decrease in units. The Commission recommended adoption of the MND; however, the minimum number of votes required to recommend approval of a General Plan Amendment were not received. For a recommendation to pass for legislative items such as GPA's, the majority of the membership of the recommending body is required. Since the Commission has seven members, the number of votes needed is four. There is no recommendation from the Commission to approve the GPA, SP and SDP. Public Hearing Notice This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on March 17, 2023, and distributed to properties within 1,000 feet of the Site. Staff has received written comments from the public stating their opposition, with concerns regarding traffic, noise, and views (Attachment 5). Tribal Consultation In accordance with SB18 and AB52, Tribal Consultation was conducted with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI), who were the only tribe to request consultation. Mitigation was incorporated into the MND as requested by the ACBCI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department (Department) prepared a MND consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Exhibit A to EA2022-0001 Resolution) and circulated it for public review from March 3, 2023 through March 23, 2023 as prescribed by the CEQA Guidelines. The Department determined that the project would have less than significant effects on the environment, with mitigation measures incorporated. The City received eleven (11) public comments during the public review period regarding the traffic, biological, energy, and cultural resources. None of the comment letters triggered modifications to the MND. Prepared by: Cheri Flores, Planning Manager Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Draft Housing Element Inventory Sites Map Amendment 3. Entitlement Plans 4. Landscape Plans 5. Public Comments 253 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A 252-UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2022-0001 APPLICANT: IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on August 1, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Irwin Partners Architects, for a 252-unit apartment project, La Quinta Village Apartments, located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, more commonly described as: Assessor Parcel Number: 646-070-016 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 21, 2023 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on March 28, 2023, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider said request and continued said Public Hearing to a date certain of June 27, 2023, to give the applicant time to address the Planning Commission's concerns regarding architectural design, density and height of buildings, parking, and traffic; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on June 27, 2023, hold a continued Public Hearing considering changes to the project as requested and recommended adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2022-0001; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act to justify approval of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal 254 City Council Resolution 2023-XXX Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 2 of 3 community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant levels. 2. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant. 3. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby does recommend adoption of Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 with mitigation measures included as Exhibit A, incorporated herewith by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on August 1, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 255 City Council Resolution 2023-XXX Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 256 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX, EXHIBIT A ADOPTED: AUGUST 1, 2023 Administrative Draft Troutdale Village Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lead Agency: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Prepared by: The Altum Group Rich Malacoff, AICP 44-600 Village Court, Suite 100 Palm Desert, CA 92260 MG March 2023 257 Table of Contents Chapter1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview...............................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Authority...............................................................................................................................................1 1.3 Scope of Environmental Review...........................................................................................................1 1.4 Impact Assessment Terminology..........................................................................................................2 1.5 Organization of the Initial Study...........................................................................................................2 1.6 Documents Incorporated by Reference................................................................................................2 Chapter 2 Project Description............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Project Location and Setting.................................................................................................................4 2.2 Project Description...............................................................................................................................5 2.3 Project -Related Approvals....................................................................................................................5 2.4 Summary of Mitigation Measures........................................................................................................6 Chapter 3 Environmental Evaluation................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Aesthetics............................................................................................................................................16 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources....................................................................................................18 3.3 Air Quality...........................................................................................................................................19 3.4 Biological Resources...........................................................................................................................27 3.5 Cultural Resources..............................................................................................................................31 3.6 Energy.................................................................................................................................................34 3.7 Geology and Soils................................................................................................................................35 3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.................................................................................................................40 3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials......................................................................................................42 3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality.............................................................................................................45 3.11 Land Use and Planning.......................................................................................................................48 3.12 Mineral Resources..............................................................................................................................50 3.13 Noise...................................................................................................................................................51 3.14 Population and Housing.....................................................................................................................54 3.15 Public Services....................................................................................................................................55 3.16 Recreation..........................................................................................................................................58 3.17 Transportation....................................................................................................................................59 Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND ii Marcl�gR13 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources....................................................................................................................63 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems..............................................................................................................66 3.20 Wildfire...............................................................................................................................................68 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance...................................................................................................69 Chapter4 Report Preparers........................................................................................................................ 74 List of Tables Table 1 Surrounding Land Uses......................................................................................................................4 Table 2 Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions..........................................................22 Table 3 Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions.........................................................................23 Table 4 Maximum Number of Acres Disturbed Per Day..............................................................................24 Table 5 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors.................................................................25 Table 6 Local Operational Emissions at the Nearest Receptors..................................................................26 Table 7 Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions.......................................................................41 Table 8 Off -Site Traffic Noise Levels............................................................................................................53 Table 9 Existing Conditions (2021) Intersection Analysis............................................................................61 Table 10 Project Completion (2023) Intersection Analysis............................................................................61 Table 11 Cumulative Intersection Analysis....................................................................................................62 List of Exhibits Exhibit1 Regional Map....................................................................................................................................9 Exhibit2 Vicinity Map....................................................................................................................................10 Exhibit3 Site Plan..........................................................................................................................................11 Exhibit4 Renderings......................................................................................................................................12 Exhibit 5 Avenue 50 Noise Contour Map.......................................................................................................13 Exhibit 6 Washington Street Noise Contour Map..........................................................................................14 Appendix Appendix A Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse, and Energy Impact Study, MD Acoustics, December 30, 2021. Appendix B Biological Resources Report for the Troutdale Village Project Located in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California, ELMT Consulting, December 15, 2021. Appendix C Cultural Resource Investigation in Support of the Troutdale Village Project, PaleoWest, April 25, 2022. Appendix D Troutdale Village Apartments Project Noise Impact Study, MD Acoustics, January 12,2022. Appendix E Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis, Integrated Engineering Group, December 2021. Appendix F Preliminary Hydrology Study for Troutdale Village, Egan Civil, January 22, 2023. Appendix G Troutdale Village Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Egan Civil, January 2023. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND iii Marcl�g923 Acronyms AB Assembly Bill AMSL Above Mean Sea Level APN Assessor's Parcel Number AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BMPs Best Management Practices CA EPA California Environmental Protection Agency CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CALGreen California Green Building Standards Caltrans California Department of Transportation CAP Climate Action Plan CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CDC California Department of Conservation CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFC Chlorofluorocarbons CH4 Methane CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CNPS California Native Plant Society CO Carbon Monoxide COz Carbon Dioxide CVMSHCP Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan CVWD Coachella Valley Water District dB Decibel dBA A -weighted decibels DSUSD Desert Sands Unified School District DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control DU/AC Dwelling Unit per Acre e.g. Exempli Gratia or "for example" EIR Eastern Information Center EPA Environmental Protection Agency FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG Greenhouse Gas IID Imperial Irrigation District In/sec Inches Per Second IS Initial Study Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND iv Marcl�g823 ITE Institute of Engineers Lbs/day Pounds Per Day Leq Equivalent Continuous Sound Pressure Level LST Localized Significance Threshold MGD Million Gallons Per Day MILD Most Likely Descendant MMTCOze Million Metric Tons of CO2 Emitted MRZ-3 Mineral Resources Zone 3 MWD Metropolitan Water District of Southern California N20 Nitrous Oxides NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NO Nitric Oxide NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide NOx Nitrogen Oxide NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System PDPD Palm Desert Police Department PM Particulate Matter PM10 Particulate Matter Equal to or less than 10 Microns in Diameter PM2.5 Particulate Matter Equal to or less than 2.5 Microns in Diameter PPM Parts Per Million PPV Peak Particle Velocities PRC California Public Resources Code PSI Pounds Per Square Inch PSUSD Palm Springs Unified School District RCALUC Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission RCFD Riverside County Fire Department RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCS/SCS Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy RMS Root Mean Square RTP Regional Transportation Plan RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SB Senate Bill SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Associations of Government SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCE Southern California Edison SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SIP State Implementation Plan S02 Sulfur Dioxide Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND v Marcl�g923 SoCal Gas Southern California Gas SOI Sphere of Influence SRA Source Receptor Area SRA State Responsibility Area SSAB Salton Sea Air Basin STC Sound Transmission Class SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VdB Vibration decibels VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled WMP Water Management Plan WQMP Water Quality Management Plan WRP 10 Wastewater Treatment Plant 10 Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND vi Marcl�g913 This page intentionally left blank. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND vii Marcl�gg13 1 INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview Troutdale Village, LLC. (hereafter, "Applicant") is proposing to develop the Troutdale Village Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 Project (hereafter, "Project"), which consists of 284 dwelling units in the City of La Quinta (hereafter, "City"), in Riverside County, California. The Project site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 and is comprised of one parcel totaling approximately 14.03 acres. Currently, the Project site is vacant and is bordered by a residential community to the north, Washington Street to the west, vacant land to the east, and Avenue 50 to the south. The proposed Project will require the following entitlements from the City: 1) Specific Plan Amendment to replace the previous La Paloma Specific Plan (now called Troutdale Specific Plan) for the Project site and substitute forthe City of La Quinta Municipal Code; 2) Change of Zone to change the existing zoning designation of the Project site from Medium High Density Residential to High Density Residential; and 3) Site Development Permit to allow for the development of 284 dwelling units and associated site improvements. 1.2 Authority The City of La Quinta is the lead agency for the proposed Project. The City Council is the governing body for the approval of the Project and adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Because the Project involves a change to the existing site, the City Council's consideration of the Project and its potential environmental effects is a discretionary action that is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Subsequent Initial Study (IS) and its appendices have been prepared in accordance with CEQA (Statute), the State's Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (Guidelines) (as amended, 2018), and the City's CEQA Guidelines for preparation of an IS. This IS, when combined with the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, serves as the environmental document for the proposed Project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq.). 1.3 Scope of Environmental Review The IS evaluates the proposed Project's potential environmental impacts on the following topics: • Aesthetics • Agricultural and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Energy • Geology and Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use and Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population and Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation • Tribal Cultural Resources • Utilities and Service Systems • Wildfire • Mandatory Findings of Significance Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 1 April 2022 264 1 INTRODUCTION 1.4 Impact Assessment Terminology The Environmental Checklist identifies potential impacts using four levels of significance as follows: • No Impact. A finding of no impact is made when it is clear from the analysis that the proposed project would not affect the environment. • Less than significant. A finding of less than significant is made when it is clear from the analysis that a proposed project would cause no substantial adverse change in the environment and no mitigation is required. • Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. A finding of less than significant with mitigation incorporated is made when it is clear from the analysis that a proposed project would cause no substantial adverse change in the environment when mitigation measures are successfully implemented by the project proponent. • Potentially Significant. A finding of potentially significant is made when the analysis concludes that the proposed project could have a substantially adverse impact on the environment related to one or more of the topics listed in the previous section, Scope of the Initial Study. 1.5 Organization of the Initial Study The content and format of this IS meet the requirements of CEQA. This IS contains the following sections: • Chapter 1 Introduction. This chapter provides a brief summary of the proposed Project, identifies the lead agency, summarizes the purpose and scope of the IS, and identifies documents incorporated by reference. • Chapter 2 Proiect Description. This chapter provides a project overview including a description of the regional location and Project vicinity, including Exhibits; and provides a description of the Project elements, e.g., dimensions of the Project, and identifies other agencies that may have permitting authority over the Project. • Chapter 3 Environmental Checklist. This chapter provides a copy of the City's Environmental Checklist and responses to each question posed in the checklist. This chapter also provides a brief description of the sources used to evaluate the proposed Project, a brief description of the existing conditions for each topic, and an analysis of potential environmental impacts. Mitigation measures are also identified where necessary. • Chapter 4 List of Preparers. This chapter identifies City staff and consultants who were responsible for the preparation of this IS and implementation of the Project. 1.6 Documents Incorporated by Reference As allowed by CEQA Guidelines Section 15150, a Mitigated Negative Declaration may incorporate by reference all or portions of another document that is generally available to the public. The document used must be available for public review for interested parties to access during public review of the Subsequent Initial Study and Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Project. The following documents are incorporated by reference. • City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013 (Amended November 19, 2013) • Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 2 April 2022 265 1 INTRODUCTION These documents are also available for review at the La Quinta City Hall at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. The Project specific reports are attached to the Initial Study as appendices. The General Plan and General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report are located on the City's website at: https://www.laquintaca.gov/business/design-and-development/planning-division/2035-la-guinta-general- plan and https://www.laquintaca.gov/business/lg2035-general-plan/documents, respectively. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 3 April 2022 266 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Chapter 2 Project Description 2.1 Project Location and Setting As detailed in Exhibit 1 Regional Map, and Exhibit 2, Vicinity Map, the Project site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta (City), in Riverside County, California. The Project site encompasses Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 646-070-016. Existine General Plan Designation The Project site is designated as "Medium/High Density Residential" under the City's General Plan 2035 Land Use Map. The Medium/High Density Residential designation is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including small -lot divisions, duplex, condominium, and apartments. The maximum density of this land use designation is 16 dwelling units per acre. Existing/Proposed Zoning Designation The Project site is zoned "Medium High Density Residential (RMH)" and within an Affordable Housing Overlay per the City's Official Zoning Map and Municipal Code. Per the City's Municipal Code Section 9.30.060, the purpose of the RMH zoning designation is to provide for the development and preservation of medium -high density neighborhoods (eight to twelve dwelling units per acre), except as provided in Section 9.40.020. The Applicant is proposing a Change of Zone to change the Project site's zoning designation from RMH to "High Density Residential (RH)," which allows up to 16 units per acre. The Affordable Housing Overlay designation would remain. Existing Specific Plan Designation The entire Project site is located within the La Paloma Specific Plan (SP 04-071) which would be called Troutdale Village Specific Plan (Specific Plan 2022-0001, SP 04-071 Amendment). Surrounding Land Uses The Project site is bordered by a residential community located immediately north; to the west, the Project site is bordered by Washington Street and beyond is a residential community; to the east, the Project site is bordered by a dry channel and beyond is La Quinta Middle School, YMCA, and the Boys and Girls Club; and to the south, the Project site is bordered by Avenue 50 and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land. See Table 1, Surrounding Land Uses. Table 1 Surrounding Land Uses Direction General Plan Designation Zoning Existing Land Use North MHDR - Medium/High Density RM - Medium Density Residential community Residential Residential MHDR - Medium/High Density RM - Medium Density Avenue 50/Vacant, undeveloped South Residential Residential land Dry channel and La Quinta Middle East OS-N - Open Space Natural FP- Floodplain School, YMCA, and the Boys and Girls Club; West LDR - Low Density Residential RL -Low DensityResidential Washington Street/Residential Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 4 April 2022 267 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Existing Utility Infrastructure Existing utility infrastructure at the Project site consists of an 18-inch Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) waterline beneath Washington Street and Avenue 50. Additionally, sewer mains are located on the west side of the site in Washington Street and on the south side of the site in Avenue 50. There are existing power poles located on Washington Street, Avenue 50, and the north property line, which may be undergrounded if practical and allowed by Imperial Irrigation District (IID). 2.2 Project Description As shown in both Exhibit 3, Site Plan, the proposed Project involves the development of 11 two- and three- story apartment buildings totaling 284 dwelling units on a 14.03-acre property. The proposed apartment buildings would have a maximum height of 40 feet. Of the 284 dwelling units, 214 will be market -rate units and 70 will be moderate -income affordable units. The Applicant also proposes associated site improvements including landscaping, utility infrastructure, parking spaces, an internal roadway, a clubhouse, pool and spa, barbeque areas, putting course, pickleball court, and dog park for the residents. The Project would contain two retention basins along the western side of the Project site. The Project would provide for a total of 520 parking spaces, including 456 standard spaces, 12 accessible spaces, and 52 future electric vehicle (EV) capable spaces. The Project also would provide two bicycle parking racks, for a total of four spaces. Primary Project access would be provided along the Project site's frontage on Washington Street. The proposed secondary access would be provided along the Project site's frontage on Avenue 50. The internal circulation is a driveway around the perimeter of the site, which would not consist of dead -ends. This design also provides easy access for the fire department and trash collector to all proposed buildings on the site. Street improvements to the Project site's frontages with Washington Street and Avenue 50 would consist of expanded pavement, curb, gutter, median, and sidewalk/bike improvements. 2.3 Project -Related Approvals The discretionary approvals required by the City include: • Specific Plan Amendment No. 2022-001 • Change of Zone No. 2022-0002 • Site Development Permit No. 2022-0001 • Adoption of Troutdale Village Specific Plan IS/MND (EA2022-0001) • General Plan Amendment No. 2022-0002 Administrative approvals are required by the City related to the design and construction of stormwater drainage infrastructure, Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for construction of water and sewer infrastructure and connection to the water and sewer distribution and conveyance systems, and Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board for issuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and approval of the Project's Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 5 April 2022 268 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.4 Summary of Mitigation Measures 1310-1 If unavoidable, Project construction activities must begin during the nesting bird season (February 1st through August 31st), a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal activities. The nesting pre - construction bird survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with identification of avian species known to occur in Riverside County. The nesting bird survey shall be conducted on foot inside the project boundary, including a 300-foot buffer for passerines (songbirds) and a 500-foot buffer for raptors in areas of suitable habitat. Inaccessible areas will be surveyed using binoculars to the extent practical. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (dependent upon species, the proposed work activity, the existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. If a raptor nest is observed in a tree proposed for removal, the applicant must consult with CDFW. All construction personnel shall be notified of the existence of the buffer zone and avoid entering the buffer zone during nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer area until the avian biologist has confirmed the breeding/nesting is completed and the young have fledged. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. 1310-2 The Applicant shall pay the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to building permit issuance. CUL-1 A qualified archaeologist monitor shall be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project construction phase. In the case that archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbing activities, work in the area shall cease and any deposits shall be treated according to Federal, State, and local guidelines. No further grading is permitted in the area of the discovery until the City approves the appropriate measure to protect the discovered resources. CUL-2 In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground disturbing activities on the Project site, no further disturbance shall occur, and all work shall cease until the County Coroner has made a determination of the origin and disposition of the remains. Ground disturbing activities and excavations shall not resume until the following has been addressed: 1. The County Coroner has been contacted and determined that no investigation to the cause of death is required, and 2. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are of Native American decent, the Coroner must notify Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will then determine the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. GEO-1 Prior to the start of the proposed Project activities, all field personnel will receive a worker's environmental awareness training on paleontological resources. The training will provide a description of the laws and ordinances protecting fossil resources, the types of fossil resources that may be encountered in the Project area, the role of the paleontological monitor, outlines steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made and provides contact information for the Project Paleontologist. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 6 April 2022 269 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The training will be developed by the Project Paleontologist and can be delivered concurrent with other training including cultural, biological, safety, etc. GEO-2 Prior to the commencement of ground -disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist will be retained to prepare and implement a PRMMP for the proposed Project. The PRMMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into older Quaternary (Pleistocene) age sediments, and the location of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential. Part- time monitoring, or spot checking, may be required during shallow ground -disturbances (< 10 feet below ground surface) to confirm that sensitive geologic units are not being impacted. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. GEO-3 In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and, if appropriate, collected. If the resource is determined to be of scientific significance, the Project Paleontologist shall complete the following: Salvage of Fossils. If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or Project Paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the Project Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological as outlined in the PRMMP prepared for the Project. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert, or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner. Fossil Preparation and Curation. The PRMMP will identify the museum that has agreed to accept fossils that may be discovered during project -related excavations. Upon completion of fieldwork, all significant fossils collected will be prepared in a properly equipped laboratory to a point ready for curation. Preparation may include the removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing or repairing specimens. During preparation and inventory, the fossils specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level practical prior to curation at an accredited museum. The fossil specimens must be delivered to the accredited museum or repository no later than 90 days after all fieldwork is completed. The cost of curation will be assessed by the repository and will be the responsibility of the client. GEO-4 Upon completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the Project Paleontologist should prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report should include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated. TCR-1 Prior to any ground disturbing activities on the Project site, an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be present to monitor the site. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 7 April 2022 270 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Cal iente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 8 April 2022 271 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Exhibit 1 Reeional MaD I. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 9 April 2022 272 rir i �,' eye RN 20. ' ^ r 4 � • �rN1=i1 4� *�IJ■L p� 1•■-r � f.ti � 't � 1 �' �.. I�wpm%,.M1 r� rytY�i/[M••r[iyrFM R-'rJ J� 4 ,t 7 y� tc � °'�¢ 1. ■ £ kJa+� _� •tea � r •l ' p'� � � ,' -�*. ■rrYJ4l.iLwi j• q J.A. .�J i� 4.1ry1■ �¢�. . - - ram'^ ` . � + � - r } 1, - Mid k '� i �{ J# ■ � 4 .� - ' •�� ira '� • '# MNT,t ' � � .+� 4 war . • - 3, AO {'d M •[„� ti i1 ,,. r3 2 • rry�(` �� iy ��++aF •IiWIL AMW- Vr a■yJk� 4 Am" �.a� �i: k *i4 �7215Q 1-, .• r -17 Tip rigigJ 7 41 �'y.. ''frrrS1Sc1 ;, a.I-b;p # _ m,. _ rt •ems _ do +� u•bwa i { _ _ F * _ a 4i im AVIMUI NIP big TZ Tft.WL.M VdlAfr- $4. PW r—w.w V41M.. & LC Al uj m 0 m m C: 0 z 274 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Exhibit 4 Renderings Above: View of entry access on Avenue 50. 00-= JP Above: View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountain range in background. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 12 April 2022 275 w iI dd ! IJ ilk ALT `I91 i : ' I4 Ili 14 1 I 11 I i I+ I �-ti-1i�E#fFT�k#3�'li`_'�i � I• _ -.ae�b �"-' � t� ,1; � 4 's -lam =.4 7 07412136 LQ Troutdale Ls Qulntai Nalao Noise Level Contours Levels in dB(A) 50 - 55 55 - 60 64 - 65 i5 - 70 }- 70 Length scale 1:134 is 'Al PIP r.70 f1m MDACOUSTIUS 'a 276 7F5j b731213G LQ 7rou#dole Le Qulnte Ngise Naiatr Levol Canloura Levels in dB(A) ■�� so so 55 55 60 by - 65 65 70 �= 70 sins and symbols Level Little, d6A Pot rit Receivers Roadway Length Seale 1:130 a so coo- xm Ma f— ACOUSTIC m x ZT r+ w 277 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Chapter 3 Environmental Evaluation ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry ❑ Air Quality Resources ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards and Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality Materials ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as describe on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 15 April 2022 278 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.1 Aesthetics 3.1.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 • California Department of Transportation, California State Scenic Highway System Map, 2019 • Google Earth, 2022 3.1.2 Environmental Setting Scenic views from the Project site consists of the San Bernardino (north, northeast, and northwest), Santa Rosa (southwest), and San Jacinto (west) Mountain Ranges. The San Bernardino, Santa Rosa, and San Jacinto Mountains Ranges rise over the valley floor at elevations consisting of 8,716 feet (2,657 meters), 8,011 feet (2,442 meters), and 11,489 feet (3,502 meters), respectively. 3.1.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact P Mitigation Impact P Impact Incorporated AESTHETICS —Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic ❑ ❑ ❑ buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ❑ ❑ ® ❑ would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than Significant Impact The Project site and the vicinity of the Project site do not contain a scenic vista. The nearest scenic vista consists of scenic views of the San Bernardino Mountains located 7.7 miles north of the Project site; Santa Rosa Mountains located approximately 5.0 miles southwest of the Project site; and San Jacinto Mountains located approximately 1.8 miles west of the Project site. Surrounding the Project site, views of the lower elevations of the aforementioned are partially blocked due to existing development and distance from the mountains; however, views of the middle and upper elevations of these mountains are kept visibly intact. As shown in Exhibit 3, Site Plan, the proposed maximum height for residential buildings at 40 feet would comply with the City's Zoning Code. The proposed buildings and site improvements would partially obscure views of the San Bernardino Mountains, Santa Rosa Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 16 April 2022 279 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Mountains, and San Jacinto Mountains — although not substantially more than under existing conditions — and views of these Mountains would continue to be available above the proposed buildings. Therefore, the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and impacts would be less than significant. b. No Impact According to the California Scenic Highway Program, the nearest scenic highway is SR-74, which is located approximately 6.2 miles west of the Project site and is classified as an Officially Designated Scenic Highway. Due to the distance between the Project site and SR-74, the Project site is not visible to vehicles driving along SR-74. In addition, there are no historic buildings nor any unique geologic or topographic features such as rock outcrops, bodies of water, ridges or canyons found on or within the Project site. Therefore, due to topography and intervening development, the proposed Project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. No impact would occur. C. Less than Significant Impact The Project site is located in an urbanized area. Under existing conditions, the entire Project site is undeveloped vacant land with sparse desert flora. The surrounding land to the north and west are residential homes, vacant planned residential homes to the south, and a dry channel to the east. Implementation of the Project would result in the visual conversion of the site from vacant, undeveloped land to 284 homes. The Project would be compatible with the size, scale, and aesthetic features of other existing homes located to the north, west, and future homes to the south of the Project site. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with the applicable development standards and design guidelines in the Troutdale Specific Plan and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), which regulates the visual quality of new development and ensures that new development does not detract from any scenic attributes/qualities in the surrounding area. LQMC Section 9.50.020, Height Limits and Setbacks Near Image Corridors, requires a maximum height of 22 feet within the first 150 feet from Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The Specific Plan will provide modified standards that will allow a maximum height of 40 feet, which will not impact the view of the mountains. The renderings (Exhibit 4) show that the views will not be impacted. Because the Project is in an urbanized area and would not conflict with applicable zoning standards and other regulations governing scenic quality, a less than significant impact would occur from implementation of the Project. d. Less than Significant Impact Under existing conditions, the Project site contains no sources of artificial lighting. The Project would introduce new sources of lighting, including streetlights and security lighting. Subject to City review and approval, all Project lighting would be required to conform to regulations, guidelines, and standards established under LQMC Section 9.150.080, Parking Facility Design Standards, and LQMC Section 9.100.150, Outdoor Lighting, which ensures adequate lighting for public safety while also minimizing light pollution, glare, and public nuisances. Mandatory compliance with the City's Zoning Code would ensure that the Project would not introduce any permanent design features that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.1.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. 3.1.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 17 April 2022 280 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 3.2.1 Sources • Riverside Map My County, 2022. https://gisl.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC Public. 3.2.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is presently vacant, and the ground surface is covered with scattered desert brush, weeds, and minor debris. The Project site has an existing ground surface elevation range from about 40 to 59 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) designates the Project site as Urban and Built -Up Land. 3.2.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the Project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and ❑ ❑ ❑ Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a El ElWilliamson Act Contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources ❑ ❑ ❑ Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in ❑ ❑ conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? a-e. No Impact According to mapping information available from the California Department of Conservation's (CDC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the Project site is classified as Urban and Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 18 April 2022 281 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Built -Up Land. Accordingly, the Project site does not contain any lands mapped by the FMMP as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland); therefore, the Project would not convert such Farmland to non-agricultural use. Furthermore, the Project site is not located within a Williamson Act contract. Lastly, the Project site is zoned for Medium/High Density Residential under existing conditions; therefore, the Project would not conflict with zoning for agricultural use or result in the loss of forest land or convert forest land or timberland to non -forest land. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 3.2.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.2.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.3 Air Quality 3.3.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Study, December 30, 2021 (Appendix A) 3.3.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is one of the 35 air quality regulatory agencies in the State of California and all development within the SSAB is subject to SCAQMD's 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) and the 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (2003 CV PM10 SIP). The SCAQMD operates and maintains regional air quality monitoring stations at numerous locations throughout its jurisdiction. The SCAQMD is divided into 38 air -monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The Project site is located in the City of La Quinta within the County of Riverside in the Coachella Valley (Area 30). The nearest air monitoring station to the Project site is the Palm Springs — Fire Station (Palm Springs Station) approximately 18 miles northwest of the site. However, this location does not provide all ambient weather data. Therefore, additional data was pulled from the SCAQMD historical data for the Coachella Valley Area (Area 30) for both sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide to provide the existing levels The SSAB exceeds state and federal standards for fugitive dust (PM10) and ozone (03) and is in attainment/unclassified for PM2.5. Ambient air quality in the SSAB, including the Project site, does not exceed state and federal standards for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxides, sulfur dioxide, lead, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, or Vinyl Chloride. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 19 April 2022 282 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.3.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is ❑ ❑ ® ❑ non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of ❑ ❑ ❑ people? a. Less than Significant Impact The SCAQMD has established the AQMP to achieve State and Federal air quality standards. On June 30, 2016, the SCAQMD released its Draft 2016 AQMP. The Plan was approved by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CA EPA) on June 15, 2017. Therefore, the applicable air quality plan for the Project is the SCAQMD 2016 AQMP. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The pollutant reducing mechanisms in the AQMP are based, in part, on urban growth projections estimated by the Southern California Associations of Government (SCAG). The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: 1. Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. 2. Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2016 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Below, Criterion 1 and Criterion 2 are discussed. Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations? Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in Appendix A, short-term regional construction air emissions would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. In addition, long-term operational impacts would not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD local and regional thresholds of significance shown in Tables 10 and 11 of Appendix A. Based on the information provided above, the proposed Project would be consistent with the first criterion. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 20 April 2022 283 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP? Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed Project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the proposed Project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The AQMP is developed through use of the planning forecasts provided in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). The RTP/SCS is a major planning document for the regional transportation and land use network within Southern California. The RTP/SCS is a long-range plan that is required by federal and state requirements placed on SCAG and is updated every four years. The FTIP provides long-range planning for future transportation improvement projects that are constructed with state and/or federal funds within Southern California. Local governments are required to use these plans as the basis of their plans for the purpose of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this Project, the City of La Quinta General Plan's Land Use Plan defines the long-range land use assumptions that are represented in AQMP. The Project has a current land use classification of Medium High Density Residential according to the City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map. The proposed Project is to develop the site with a 284-unit apartment complex on 14.03 acres for a density of approximately 20.2 dwelling units per acre. As the Medium High Density Residential Land Use allows for eight to twelve dwelling units per acre, the Project proposes a zone change to High Density Residential allowing for up to 16 dwelling units per acre. The additional units past the 16 dwelling units per acre are part of the Project's density bonus for providing affordable units. The Project would be seeking an amendment to the City's General Plan to account for the difference. With approval of the General Plan Amendment, the proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the land use designation in the City's General Plan. Therefore, the proposed Project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the Project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Based on the above, the proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a less -than -significant impact would occur in relation to implementation of the AQMP. b. Less than Significant Impact The proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard. Construction Emissions The Project was analyzed to be operational in 2023; therefore, construction is estimated to start no sooner than the first quarter of 2022 and be completed by 2023. The phases of the construction activities which have been analyzed below are: 1) site preparation, 2) grading, 3) building, 4) paving, and 5) architectural coating. For details on construction modeling and construction equipment for each phase, refer to Appendix A. Construction -Related Regional Impacts The latest version of the CalEEMod model was used to estimate the on -site and off -site construction emissions. The worst -case summer or winter daily construction -related criteria pollutant emissions from the proposed Project for each phase of construction activities are shown below in Table 2. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently towards the end of the building construction phase, Table 2 also shows the combined regional criteria pollutant emissions from building construction, paving, and architectural coating phases of construction. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 21 April 2022 284 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Table 2 Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions5 Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO SO, PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation On-Site2 3.17 33.08 19.70 0.04 9.28 5.42 Off-Site3 0.06 0.04 0.56 0.00 0.15 0.04 Total 3.23 33.12 20.26 0.04 9.43 5.46 Grading On-Site2 3.62 38.84 29.04 0.06 5.22 2.93 Off-Site3 0.07 0.04 0.62 0.00 0.17 0.05 Total 3.69 38.89 29.66 0.06 5.39 2.97 Building Construction On-Site2 1.71 15.62 16.36 0.03 0.81 0.76 Off-Site3 1.55 5.06 14.23 0.05 4.06 1.14 Total 3.26 20.68 30.60 0.07 4.87 1.90 Paving On-Site2 1.51 10.19 14.58 0.02 0.51 0.47 Off-Site3 0.05 0.03 0.43 0.00 0.13 0.03 Total 1.56 10.22 15.01 0.02 0.64 0.50 Architectural Coating On-Site2 63.31 1.30 1.81 0.00 0.07 0.07 Off-Site3 0.26 0.15 2.34 0.01 0.69 0.19 Total 63.56 1.46 4.16 0.01 0.76 0.26 Total of Overlapping Phases° 10.16 28.22 35.85 0.06 2.36 1.57 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No Notes: Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 z On -site emissions from equipment operated on -site that is not operated on public roads. 3 Off -site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. ° Construction, architectural coatings, and paving phases may overlap. 5 The impacts from Construction related Emissions are fully mitigated. Table 2, Error! Reference source not found. shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds during either site preparation, grading, building construction, architectural coating, or the combined building construction, paving, and architectural coatings phases. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed Project. Operational Emissions Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 22 April 2022 285 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The on -going operation of the proposed Project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the Project -generated vehicle trips and onsite area source emissions from the on -going use of the proposed Project. Operations -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations -related regional criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed Project have been analyzed through use of the latest CalEEMod model and the input parameters utilized in this analysis have been detailed in Section 6.2.1 of Appendix A. The worst -case summer or winter volatile organic compounds (VOC, NOx, CO, S02, PM10, and PM2.5) daily emissions created from the proposed Project's long-term operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table 3. Table 3 Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions' Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)' vOC NOx CO S02 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources2 6.39 0.27 23.49 0.00 0.13 0.13 Energy Usage' 0.13 1.08 0.46 0.01 0.09 0.09 Mobile Source, 4.67 5.57 37.99 0.08 7.97 2.17 Total Emissions 11.19 6.92 61.94 0.09 8.19 2.39 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 z Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. a Energy usage consists of emissions from on -site natural gas usage. ° Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. Impacts are fully mitigated from Operational emissions. The data provided in Table 3 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed Project. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the Project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel well out of the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered, would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the Project's air quality must be generic by nature. The Project area is out of attainment for both ozone and PM10 particulate matter. Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the Salton Sea Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on the quality of regional air cell will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development along with the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of these projects. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately or 'The project site is approximately 0.28 miles in length at its longest point; therefore the on -site mobile source emissions represent approximately 1/25th of the shortest CalEEMod default distance of 6.9 miles. Therefore, to be conservative, 1/10th the distance (dividing the mobile source emissions by 10) was used to represent the portion of the overall mobile source emissions that would occur on -site. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 23 April 2022 286 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION simultaneously. However, in accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. The Project does not exceed any of the thresholds of significance and therefore is considered less than significant. c. Less than Significant Impact Construction -Related Local Im Construction -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the Project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Salton Sea portion of the South Coast Air Basin. The proposed Project has been analyzed for the potential local air quality impacts created from construction -related fugitive dust, diesel emissions, toxic air contaminants, and construction -related odor impacts. The emission thresholds were calculated based on the Coachella Valley, source receptor area (SRA) 30, and a disturbance value of four acres per day (see Table 4). The nearest sensitive receptors are the existing dwelling units located adjacent to the north of the Project boundary; therefore, for conservative purposes, the SCAQMD Look -up Tables for 25 meters was used. As shown in Table 5, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the calculated local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, there would be a less -than -significant impact. Table 4 Maximum Number of Acres Disturbed Per Day Activity Equipment Number Acres/81hr-day Total Acres Rubber Tired Dozers 3 0.5 1.5 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 0.5 2.0 Total Per Phase 3.5 Excavators 2 0.5 1.0 Graders 1 0.5 0.5 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.5 0.5 Scrapers 2 0.5 1.0 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2 0.5 1 1.0 Total Per Phase 4.0 Notes: 'Source: CaIEEMod output and South Coast AQMD, Fact Sheet for Applying CaIEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=2 Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 24 April 2022 287 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Table 5 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors Phase On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)' NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 33.08 19.70 9.28 5.42 Grading 38.84 29.04 5.22 2.93 Building Construction 15.62 16.36 0.81 0.76 Paving 10.19 14.58 0.51 0.47 Architectural Coating 1.30 1.81 0.07 0.07 Total of Overlapping Phases 27.11 32.76 1.39 1.30 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet) or leSS2 266 1,961 11.7 6.3 Notes: 'Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look -up Tables for four acres in Coachella Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 30). Project will disturb a maximum of 4.0 acres per day (see Table 7). 'The nearest sensitive receptor is located adjacent to the north; therefore, the 25-meter threshold has been used. Operations -Related Local Impacts Project -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the Project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SSAB. The Project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emissions impacts from Project -generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on -site operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions and local impacts from on -site operations. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project -Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing the future without and with project CO levels to the state and federal CO standards of 20 parts per million (PPM) over one hour or 9 ppm over eight hours. According to the Project's traffic report prepared by IEG (Appendix E), the Project would generate 1,684 average daily trips. The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan) showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO standard. The volume of traffic at Project buildout would be well below 100,000 vehicles and below the necessary volume to even get close to causing a violation of the CO standard. Therefore, no CO "hot spot" modeling was performed and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on -going use of the proposed Project. Local Air Quality Impacts from Onsite Operations Table 6, Local Operational Emissions at the Nearest Receptors, shows the calculated emissions for the proposed operational activities compared with the appropriate Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). The LST analysis only includes on -site sources; however, the CalEEMod software outputs do not separate on -site and off -site emissions for mobile sources. For a worst -care scenario assessment, the emissions shown in Table 6 include all on -site Project -related stationary sources and 10% of the Project -related new mobile sources. This percentage is an estimate of the amount of Project -related new vehicle traffic that would occur on -site. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 25 April 2022 288 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Table 6 Local Operational Emissions at the Nearest Receptors On -Site Emission Source On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)' NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Area Sourcesz 0.27 23.49 0.13 0.13 Energy Usage 1.08 0.46 0.09 0.09 On -Site Vehicle Emissions4 0.56 3.80 0.80 0.22 Total Emissions 1.91 27.75 1.01 0.43 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet)s 266 1,961 3.3 1.7 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No N otes: 'Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look -up Tables for four acres in Coachella Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 30). 2Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment 3Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on -site natural gas usage 'On -site vehicular emissions based on 1/10 of the gross vehicular emissions and road dust 'The nearest sensitive receptor is located adjacent to the north; therefore, the 25 meter threshold has been used The data provided in Table 6 shows that the on -going operations of the proposed Project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 thresholds of significance. Therefore, the on -going operations of the proposed Project would create a less -than -significant operations -related impact to local air quality due to on -site emissions. In conclusion, the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and impacts would be less than significant. d. Less than Significant Impact Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process are of short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected to cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor producing materials. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted during construction of the Project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the project site and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the proposed Project. The SCAQMD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. An analysis shall determine whether the Project would result in excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the California Code of Regulations and Section 41700 of the California Health and Safety Code, and thus would constitute a public nuisance related to air quality. Potential sources that may emit odors during the on -going operations of the proposed Project would include odor emissions from vehicle emissions. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the Project site and through compliance with SCAQMD's Rule 402, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on -going operations of the proposed Project. 3.3.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 26 April 2022 289 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.3.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4.1 Sources • ELMT Consulting, Biological Resources Report for the Troutdale Village Project Located in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California, December 5, 2021 (Appendix B) 3.4.2 Environmental Setting The City offers unique natural habitats to a range of plants and wildlife due to its climate and natural topography. The City recognizes the value of the wildlands and wildlife and has carefully planned to protect, preserve, and enhance the region's valuable biological resources. The City is located within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Conservation Plan (CVMSHP). This is a regional plan that is implemented throughout the Coachella Valley in an effort to comply with Federal and State endangered species laws. A literature review and records search for the site was conducted by ELMT Consulting. The literature search identified 16 special -status plant species, 23 special -status wildlife species, and one special -status plant community as having potential to occur within the City of La Quinta quadrangle. ELMT also conducted a field survey of the site on November 3, 2021. The Project site is located at an approximate elevation of 42 to 59 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) and slopes generally from northeast to southwest. The Project site supports one plant community, alkali scrub, and one land cover type that would be classified as disturbed. No special -status plants were observed on the Project site during the field investigation. No fish, amphibians, or hydrogeomorphic features that would provide suitable habitat for fish or amphibians were observed on or within the vicinity of the Project site. The Project site provides suitable foraging and cover habitat for reptilian species adapted to routine human disturbance and desert environments. The only reptilian species observed during the field investigation were Great Basin whiptail (Aspidoscelis tigris tigris) and western side -blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana elegans). The Project site provides suitable foraging and nesting habitat for avian species adapted to routine human disturbance and desert environments. Bird species detected during the field investigation include mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), common raven (Corvus corax), great -tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus), white -crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), and rock pigeon (Columba liva), and verdin (Auriparus flaviceps). The Project site provides suitable foraging and denning habitat for mammalian species adapted to routine human disturbance and desert environments. However, most mammal species are nocturnal and are difficult to observe during a diurnal field visit. Mammals detected and/or signs observed during the field investigation include desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii), and coyote (Canis latrans). No active nests or birds displaying nesting behavior were observed during the field survey, which was conducted outside of the breeding season. Although subjected to routine disturbance, the ornamental vegetation found on -site has the potential to provide suitable nesting habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, as well as migrating songbirds that could occur in the area that area adapted to urban environments. No raptors are expected to nest on -site due to lack of suitable nesting opportunities. Lastly, the Project site is not located within a federally designated Critical Habitat. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 27 April 2022 290 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.4.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status ❑ ® ❑ ❑ species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, ❑ ❑ ❑ regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, ❑ ❑ ❑ vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree ❑ ❑ ❑ preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? a. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated According to the City's General Plan, the Project site is located within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), which aims to conserve over 240,000 acres of open space and protect 27 plant and animal species. Special -Status Vegetation Communities & Critical Habitat Analysis According to the field survey conducted by ELMT Consulting on November 3, 2021, the Project site supports one plant community: alkali scrub, which is dominated by hoary saltbush (Atriplex canescens) and is indicative of native bush scrub communities that have been devegetated and allowed to revegetate naturally. Common plant species observed in this plant community include cattle spinach (Atriplex polycarpa), barbwire Russian thistle (Salsola paulsenii), burrobrush (Ambrosia salsola), Mediterranean grass (Schismus barbatus), puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris), narrow leaved cryptantha (Cryptantha angustifolia), fanleaf crinklemat (Tiquilia plicata), blue palo verde (Parkinsonia florida), creosote (Larrea tridentata), and honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). The Project site supports disturbed areas throughout the Project associated with formerly graded areas, unofficial walkways, and recreational vehicle trails, within utility easements along the western and southern boundaries. These areas can be Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 28 April 2022 291 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION unvegetated or vegetated with a limited variety of hardy native and non-native plant species such as Mediterranean grass, barbwire Russian thistle, and puncture vine. In addition, the northern boundary of the Project site supports disturbed land where ornamental vegetation has invaded the site from adjacent residential developments. Based on observations made during the field survey, the Project would not impact any special -status vegetation community. According to literature review, one special -status plant community was identified as having potential to occur within the La Quinta quadrangle: Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland. However, based on the results of the field survey above, this and no other special -status plant community was observed on -site; therefore, no special -status plant community would be impacted by Project implementation. The Project site is also not located within a federally designated Critical Habitat. The nearest designated Critical Habitat to the site is located approximately 1.55 miles to the west for Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni). Therefore, the Project would not cause loss or adverse modification of a Critical Habitat and impacts would be less than significant. Special -Status Plant Species Analysis According to literature review, 16 special -status plant species were identified as having potential to occur within the La Quinta quadrangle. Species determined to have a potential to occur within the general vicinity of the site are presented in Table D-1 of Appendix B. No special -status plants were observed on the Project site during the field survey conducted on November 3, 2021. Based on habitat requirements for specific species, the availability and quality of on -site habitats, and the isolation of the site and adjacent open space from nearby habitats, it was determined that the Project site does not have potential to support any of the special -status plant species known to occur in the vicinity of the site and all are presumed to be absent. In addition, the Project site is located outside of the known elevation ranges for the majority of the special -status plant species known to occur in the area. Therefore, Project impacts to special -status plant species would be less than significant. Special -Status Wildlife Species Analysis According to literature review, 23 special -status wildlife species were identified as having potential to occurwithin the La Quinta quadrangle. Species determined to have a potential to occurwithin the general vicinity of the site are presented in Table D-1 of Appendix B. No special -status wildlife species were observed on -site during the field investigation. Based on habitat requirements for specific species and the availability and quality of on -site habitats, it was determined that the Project site has a moderate potential to support prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus) and black -tailed gnatcatcher (Polioptila melaneura). It was further determined that all other special -status wildlife species known to occur in the vicinity of the site do not have potential to occur and are presumed to be absent. None of the special -status wildlife species are state or federally listed as threatened or endangered. In order to ensure impacts to these avian species do not occur from implementation of the Project, a pre - construction nesting bird clearance survey shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance as described in Mitigation Measure (MM) BIO-1, below. With implementation of MM BIO-1, impacts to special -status avian species would be less than significant. The Project site provides suitable foraging and cover habitat for species adapted to routine human disturbance and desert environments that are not special -status species. In conclusion, impacts to reptiles, birds, or mammals would be less than significant. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 29 April 2022 292 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION No active nests or birds displaying nesting behavior were observed during the field survey, which was conducted outside of the breeding season. Although subjected to routine disturbance, the ornamental vegetation found on -site has the potential to provide suitable nesting habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, as well as migrating songbirds that could occur in the area that area adapted to urban environments. However, with implementation of MM 1310-1, impacts to migrating songbirds would be less than significant. No raptors are expected to nest on -site due to lack of suitable nesting opportunities. b/c. No Impact No jurisdictional drainage and/or wetland features were observed on the Project site during the field survey. It should be noted that a flood control channel occurs outside of the proposed limits of disturbances, east of the Project site; however, Project activities are not expected to encroach into this channel. Furthermore, no blueline streams have been recorded on the Project site and there is no evidence that the Project contained any streams, riparian habitat, marshes, protected wetlands, vernal pools or sensitive natural communities that would be protected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Therefore, no impact would occur. d. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The Project site has not been identified as occurring in a wildlife corridor or linkage. The site has limited adjacent open space and available open space is entirely surrounded by existing development, limiting its connectivityto surrounding habitats. In addition, there are no riparian corridors, creeks, or useful patches of steppingstone habitat (natural areas) within or connecting the site to a recognized wildlife corridor or linkage. As such, implementation of the proposed Project is not expected to impact wildlife movement opportunities. Therefore, impacts to wildlife corridors or linkages are not expected to occur. e. No Impact The City has not adopted any ordinances regarding tree preservation. As observed during the field survey, the Project site mainly consists of small and medium size shrubs. No trees are located on the Project site under existing conditions. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance and no impact would occur. f. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The Project site is located within the boundaries of CVMSHCP but is not located within any conservation areas. The Project would be subject to payment of the Development Mitigation fee per Chapter 3.34, Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee, as described as MM 1310-2. The fee would mitigate potential impacts to covered species within the CVMSHCP. Although the site is located within the CVMSHCP boundary, as mentioned in Section 2.4.3 (a), the Project site is not located within a biological sensitive or any conservation areas. Because the Project is not located within a conservation area and would implement MM 1310-2, the Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. 3.4.4 Mitigation 1310-1 If unavoidable, Project construction activities must begin during the nesting bird season (February 1st through August 31st), a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal activities. The nesting pre - construction bird survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with identification of avian species known to occur in Riverside County. The nesting bird survey shall be conducted on foot inside the project boundary, including a 300-foot bufferfor passerines (songbirds) and 500-foot bufferfor raptors Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 30 April 2022 293 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION in areas of suitable habitat. Inaccessible areas will be surveyed using binoculars to the extent practical. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (dependent upon species, the proposed work activity, the existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. If a raptor nest is observed in a tree proposed for removal, the applicant must consult with CDFW. All construction personnel shall be notified of the existence of the buffer zone and avoid entering the buffer zone during nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer area until the avian biologist has confirmed the breeding/nesting is completed and the young have fledged. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. 1310-2 The Applicant shall pay the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to building permit issuance. 3.4.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of MM 1310-1 and 1310-2, impacts on biological resources would be less than significant. 3.5 Cultural Resources 3.5.1 Sources PaleoWest, Cultural Resource Investigation in Support of the Troutdale Village Project, April 25, 2022. (Appendix C) 3.5.2 Environmental Setting The Project area is situated east of the Peninsular Ranges in the southern extent of the Coachella Valley at the western edge of the Colorado Desert. The Coachella Valley is bordered by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa mountains (part of the Peninsular Ranges) to the southwest and by the low, rolling Indio and Mecca hills to the northeast. From the steep slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains, the desert floor descends suddenly at less than 3 kilometers (2 miles) eastward to sea level in the city of Indio, where the Project area is located. A cultural resources survey of the Project area was conducted by PaleoWest on December 15, 2021. The Project site is a vacant, relatively flat parcel that is bounded on the west and south sides by Washington Street and Avenue 50, respectively. The east side of the property abuts a dry storm drain channel. Surficial deposits across the Project area have been disturbed by mechanical and natural processes with modern grading on the western side and undulating dunes on the eastern side. The soils on the western half are not native but a mixture of gravel, construction refuse, modern refuse, and road base from Washington Street and Avenue 50. The soils on the eastern half are native, eolian dune sands with a low density of cobbles. Vegetation within the Project area consists of salt bush (low lying shrubs), patches of mesquite, and bunch grasses. Modern trash was noted throughout the Project area. The landform of the dunes is active with sands migrating around the parcel during wind events. The dunes appear to have been subject to erosion over the years and show signs of deflation. There is evidence of a recent surface brush fire with burned vegetation observed on the ground surface. A transmission line of unknown age was also noted running west -east along the southern extent of the Project area. Although the age of the line Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 31 April 2022 294 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION is not known, a review of aerial imagery indicates that it was not present before 1972 and as such, is likely modern in age. No new cultural resources were observed. However, cultural materials associated with the previously recorded archaeological sites of 33-001180 and 33-008226 were identified in the Project area. 3.5.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated CULTURAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in ❑ ® ❑ ❑ § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ ® ❑ ❑ of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ ® ❑ ❑ outside of formal cemeteries? a/b. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated On February 4, 2022, a literature review and records search was conducted at the Eastern Information Center. The records search indicated that 117 cultural resources were previously documented within a one -mile radius of the Project area. Two of the prehistoric archaeological sites, 33-001180 (CA-RIV-1180) and 33-008226 (CA-RIV-6074), were previously documented within the Project area. Site 33-001180 was originally recorded in 1972 as a moderate to heavy surface scatter of prehistoric artifacts in an area of deflating dunes. The site record has been updated over the years to include flaked and ground stone, ceramics, and shell artifacts, as well as fire affected rock (FAR), animal bone, and charcoal. Site 33-001180 is reported to measure 76 by 46 m and is intersected by Avenue 50 and a storm drain channel. Although most of the cultural remains associated with 33-001180 appear to lie east of the storm drain channel and south of Avenue 50, a survey conducted by Parr (1985) noted several concentrations of flaked and ground stone artifacts and modified animal bone immediately north of Avenue 50 in the current Project area. The site likely represents the remains of a habitation locale. Site 33-008226 was recorded in 1998 as a prehistoric habitation site composed of six loci. The site measured 115 by 80 meters and lies within a sandy dune area with creosote brushes and mesquite. The cultural constituents identified within the site include flaked and ground stone, ceramic artifacts, FAR, animal bone and hardened clay. The mapped boundary of Site 33-008226 overlaps with the previously defined boundary of Site 33-001180. During the field survey on December 15, 2021, PaleoWest identified the two previously recorded prehistoric archaeological sites, 33-001180 and 33-008226, in the northeast portion of the Project area. The mapped boundary of Site 33-008226 largely overlaps with Site 33-001180. Therefore, PaleoWest has combined these sites into one resource, herein referred to as 33-1001180 The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation records for both 33-001180 and 33-008226 were updated to note that the two resources have been consolidated. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 32 April 2022 295 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION PaleoWest also conducted a Phase II investigation at Site 33-001180 to assess the presence/absence of buried cultural deposits in the Project area. The results of the Phase II investigation indicated that cultural deposits in the Project site are extremely sparse and are limited to the upper 20-30 cm of sediments. The absence of intact features suggests that the area has been extensively disturbed and that any thermal features or structures that were once present in the area have been destroyed. Based on these findings, PaleoWest concluded that the Project area does not contribute to the overall eligibility of the site for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources. Furthermore, the data potential of the prehistoric cultural deposits appears to have been realized fully during the Phase II investigations. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no impact to historical or archaeological resources under CEQA. However, due to the sensitivity of the area, PaleoWest recommends that an archaeological monitor be present to observe ground -disturbing construction activities in the Project area, as described in Mitigation Measure CUL-1. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1, impacts to historical and/or archaeological resources would be less than significant. c. Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated The Project site is vacant, undeveloped, and does not contain any cemeteries or human remains under existing conditions. However, there is always the possibility that human remains could be uncovered during ground disturbing activities. In the unexpected event that human remains are found during ground disturbing activities, those remains would require proper treatment in accordance with all applicable laws. Through the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, all construction work taking place within the vicinity of the discovered remains must cease and the necessary steps to ensure the integrity of the immediate area must be taken. The State of California Health and Safety Code 7050.5 and the California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98 states that the County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours of the discovered human remains. If the remains discovered are determined by the coroner to be of Native American descent, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC would, in turn, contact the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) who would determine further action to be taken. The MLD would have 48 hours to access the site and make a recommendation regarding disposition of the remains. Therefore, with incorporation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, impacts would be less than significant. 3.5.4 Mitigation CUL-1 A qualified archaeologist monitor shall be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project construction phase. In the case that archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbing activities, work in the area shall cease and any deposits shall be treated according to Federal, State, and local guidelines. No further grading is permitted in the area of the discovery until the City approves the appropriate measure to protect the discovered resources. CUL-2 In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground disturbing activities on the project site, no further disturbance shall occur and all work shall cease until the County Coroner has made a determination of the origin and disposition of the remains. Ground disturbing activities and excavations shall not resume until the following has been addressed: 1. The County Coroner has been contacted and determined that no investigation to the cause of death is required, and 2. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are of Native American decent, the Coroner must notify Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will then determine the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 33 April 2022 296 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION hours of notification and may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. 3.5.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With the incorporation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2, impacts to cultural resources would be reduced to less than significant. 3.6 Energy 3.6.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Study, December 30, 2021 (Appendix A) • California Energy Commission, 2019 Building Energy Efficient Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, December 2018 https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2021-06/CEC-400-2018-020-CMF O.pdf • Imperial Irrigation District, Troutdale Village Residential Apartment Project in La Quinta, CA, February 21, 2023. 3.6.2 Environmental Setting Electricity Imperial Irrigation District (IID) provides electricity to the City of La Quinta, including the Project site. Electricity is delivered to IID's substations throughout the City at 92 or 161 kilovolts, and decreased to 12 kilovolts for distribution to its customers. Nafiirni (;ac Natural gas for the Project site is provided by the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Natural gas supplies are transported from Texas to the Coachella Valley through three east -west trending transmission lines, which cross the Valley near and parallel to Interstate-10 and continues west to Los Angeles. The pipelines include one 30-inch line and two 24-inch lines, with pressures of 2,000 pounds per square inch (PSI). 3.6.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Energy — Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption ❑ of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for ❑ ❑ ® ❑ renewable energy or energy efficiency? Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 34 April 2022 297 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION a. Less than Significant Impact Energy Use During Construction The Project's construction process would consume electricity and fuel. Project -related construction activities would represent a "single -event" demand and would not require on -going or permanent commitment of energy resources. The amount of energy and fuel use anticipated by the Project's construction activities are typical for the type of scale of construction proposed by the Project and there are no aspects of the Project's proposed construction process that are unusual or energy intensive. Furthermore, construction equipment would be required to conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote equipment fuel efficiencies. Based on the foregoing, the Project's construction energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. Impacts during Project construction would be less than significant. Energy Use During Operation Building operations associated with the Project would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. The Project provides 284 dwelling units, which are not inherently energy intensive, and the Project energy demands in total would be comparable to, or less than, other apartment homes of similar scale. A letter from IID dated February 21,2023, stated the district would extend its electrical facilities to serve the Project by upgrading the Marshall Substation Bank 2 from 25 MVA to a 40/50 MVA, adding or reconfiguring distribution backbone line extensions, and adding new distribution feeders to the existing Marshall Station that would extend to the Project. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with Title 24 standards, which would ensure that the Project's energy demand would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. Impacts during Project operation would be less than significant. b. Less than Significant Impact The Project's proposed 284 apartment homes would be required to comply with the City's Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, and other standards including the City's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan provisions. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on plans for energy efficiency. 3.6.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.6.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.7 Geology and Soils 3.7.1 Sources • Riverside Map My County, 2022. https.Ilgisl.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC Public • City of La Quinta General Plan, February 19, 2013. • Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.loguintoca. govlhome/showpublisheddocumentll58581635338594527270000 Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 35 April 2022 298 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.7.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is located in the Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Trough physiographic province and is a geologic, structural depression resulting from large scale regional faulting. The trough is bounded by the San Andreas fault and Chocolate Mountains on the northeast and the Peninsular Range and faults of the San Jacinto Fault Zone on the southwest. The Salton Trough represents the northward extension of the Gulf of California, containing both marine and non -marine sediments since the Miocene Epoch. Tectonic activity that formed the trough continues at a high rate as evidenced by deformed young sedimentary deposits and high levels of seismicity. The surrounding regional geology includes the Peninsular Ranges (Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains) to the south and west, the Salton Sea Basin to the southeast, and the Transverse Ranges (Little San Bernardino and Orocopia Mountains) to the north and east. Hundreds of feet to several thousand feet of Quaternary fluvial, lacustrine, and Aeolian soil deposits underlie the Coachella Valley. The southeastern part of the Coachella Valley lies below sea level. In the past, the ancient Lake Cahuilla submerged the area. Calcareous tufa deposits may be observed along the ancient shoreline as high as an elevation of 45 to 50 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) along the Santa Rosa Mountains from La Quinta southward. Lacustrine (lake bed) deposits comprise the subsurface soils over much of the eastern Coachella Valley with alluvial outwash along the flanks of the valley. The Project site is located in Southern California, which is a seismically active area. The type and magnitude of seismic hazards affecting the site are dependent on the distance of causative faults, the intensity, and the magnitude of the seismic event. Existing ground surface elevations range from 40 to 59 feet AMSL. 3.7.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on ❑ other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, ❑ and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 36 April 2022 299 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal ❑ ❑ ❑ systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ ® ❑ ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? a-i. No Impact There are no known active faults crossing or projecting through the Project site. The Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, or within a fault zone identified by the County of Riverside GIS data. Therefore, ground rupture due to faulting is considered unlikely at this site. No impact would occur. a-ii. Less than Significant The Project site is located in a seismically active area of Southern California and is expected to experience moderate to severe ground shaking during the lifetime of the Project. This risk is not considered substantially different than that of other similar properties in the southern California area. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to construct the proposed buildings in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC), also known as California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24, Part 2, and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), which is based on the CBC with local amendments. The CBC and LQMC (Chapter 8.02) provide standards that must be met to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures, which have been specifically tailored for California earthquake conditions. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the site -specific ground preparation and construction recommendations contained in the Project's geological report, which would be required prior to issuance of a grading permit. Mandatory compliance with these standards along with site -specific design and construction measures set forth in the Project's geotechnical report, the CBC, and the LQMC, potential impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. As such, implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects, including loss, injury, or death, involving seismic ground shaking. Impacts would be less -than -significant. a-iii. Less than Significant According to Riverside Map My County, the Project site is located within an area with moderate liquefaction susceptibility. However, prior to issuance of a grading permit, a geotechnical report would be required to be submitted for approval. The Project Applicant would be required to comply with the grading and construction recommendations contained within the geotechnical report for the Project to further reduce the risk of seismic -related ground failure due to liquefaction. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not directly or indirectly expose people or structures to substantial hazards associated with seismic -related ground failure and/or liquefaction hazards. Impacts would be less than significant. a -iv. No Impact The Project site is generally flat and contains no substantial natural or man-made slopes under existing conditions. There are no substantial natural or man-made slopes in the Project site Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 37 April 2022 300 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION vicinity either. Accordingly, development on the subject property would not be exposed to landslide risks and the Project would not pose a landslide risk to surrounding properties. Impacts would be less than significant. b. Less than Significant Impact During construction of the proposed Project, soils would be disrupted during grading activities due to exposure of uncovered soils, thereby increasing the potential for wind or water -related erosion and sedimentation until construction is completed. Pursuant to State Water Resources Control Board requirements, the Applicant is required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for construction activities, which involves preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction -related activities. The SWPPP will specify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be required to be implemented during construction activities to ensure that waterborne pollution (erosion and sedimentation) is prevented, minimized, and/or otherwise appropriately treated prior to surface runoff being discharged from the subject property. The Project also would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 to minimize water and windborne erosion. Lastly, the Project would be required to prepare and implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), which is a site -specific post - construction water quality management program designed to minimize the release of waterborne pollutants, including pollutants of concern for downstream receiving waters, under long-term conditions via BMPs. The WQMP also is required to establish a post -construction implementation and maintenance plan to ensure on -going, long-term erosion protection. Therefore, with adherence to SCAQMD Rule 403, and preparation of a SWPPP and WQMP, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to soil erosion. C. Less than Significant The Project site does not contain substantial natural or man-made slopes under existing conditions. Additionally, there are no hillsides in the vicinity of the Project site with a potential to expose the site to landslide hazards. Therefore, no impact would occur related to landslides. Lateral spreading is primarily associated with liquefaction hazards. As previously mentioned in Section 3.7.3(a)(ii), above, the Project Applicant would be required to submit a geotechnical report prior to issuance of a grading permit and comply with the grading and construction recommendations contained within that geotechnical report to further reduce the risk of seismic -related ground failure due to liquefaction. The Project Applicant also would be required to comply with the site -specific ground preparation and construction recommendations contained in the geotechnical report for the Project site, which would attenuate the site's settlement potential. Therefore, impacts associated with liquefaction, lateral spreading, shrinkage/subsidence, and collapse would be less than significant. d. Less than Significant Impact According to the Web Soil Survey, the Project site consists of desert land comprised of Coachella fine sand and Myoma fine sand. Due to the low clay content in underlying soils, these near surface soils can be anticipated to have very low expansion characteristics. The Project site is not located in an area known for expansive soil (as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994)), and the potential for the Project to create substantial risks to life or property, relating to expansive soils, is very low. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e. No Impact The Project would not involve the use of septic tanks or any other alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, there would be no impacts associated with septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 38 April 2022 301 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site does not contain any paleontological resources under existing conditions. However, according to the City's General Plan EIR and the Riverside Map My County, the Project site is located within a High Paleontological Sensitivity due to Pleistocene sediments and sediments from ancient Lake Cahuilla beds. Therefore, a professional paleontologist would be retained to prepare and implement paleontological monitoring and mitigation plan (PRMMP) as described in Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-4. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-4, potential impacts to a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature would be reduced to less than significant. 3.7.4 Mitigation The following mitigation measures are required: GEO-1 Prior to the start of the proposed Project activities, all field personnel will receive a worker's environmental awareness training on paleontological resources. The training will provide a description of the laws and ordinances protecting fossil resources, the types of fossil resources that may be encountered in the project area, the role of the paleontological monitor, outlines steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made and provides contact information for the project paleontologist. The training will be developed by the project paleontologist and can be delivered concurrent with other training including cultural, biological, safety, etc. GEO-2 Prior to the commencement of ground -disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist will be retained to prepare and implement a PRMMP for the proposed project. The PRMMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into older Quaternary (Pleistocene) age sediments, and the location of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential. Part-time monitoring, or spot checking, may be required during shallow ground -disturbances (< 10 feet below ground surface) to confirm that sensitive geologic units are not being impacted. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. GEO-3 In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and, if appropriate, collected. If the resource is determined to be of scientific significance, the project paleontologist shall complete the following: Salvage of Fossils. If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or project paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the project paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological as outlined in the PRMMP prepared for the project. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert, or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner. 2. Fossil Preparation and Curation. The PRMMP will identify the museum that has agreed to accept fossils that may be discovered during project -related excavations. Upon completion of Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 39 April 2022 302 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION fieldwork, all significant fossils collected will be prepared in a properly equipped laboratory to a point ready for curation. Preparation may include the removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing or repairing specimens. During preparation and inventory, the fossils specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level practical prior to curation at an accredited museum. The fossil specimens must be delivered to the accredited museum or repository no later than 90 days after all fieldwork is completed. The cost of curation will be assessed by the repository and will be the responsibility of the client. GEO-4 Upon completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the project paleontologist shall prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report shall include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated. 3.7.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-4, impacts associated with geology and soils would be reduced to less than significant. 3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.8.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Study, December 30, 2021 (Appendix A) 3.8.2 Environmental Setting Constituent gases of the Earth's atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a critical role in the Earth's radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth's surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N20), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth's natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State's greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and nitrous oxide (NO2) are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off -gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. Table 6 of the Project's greenhouse gas analysis (Appendix A) provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 40 April 2022 303 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.8.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ greenhouse gases? Less than Significant Impact. The Project allows for the development of 284 dwelling units. The Project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, solid waste, water, and construction. The CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 was utilized by MD Acoustics to calculate the GHG emissions from the Project. As shown in Table 8, the Project would result in approximately 1,963.70 metric tons per year of CO2e (MTCO2e) per year and would not exceed the SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, Project GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. Table 7 Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year)' Category Bio-0O2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Area Sources' 0.00 3.45 3.45 0.00 0.00 3.54 Energy Usage 0.00 449.10 449.10 0.02 0.01 451.60 Mobile Sources° 0.00 1,300.55 1,300.55 0.08 0.07 1,323.36 Solid Wastes 26.52 0.00 26.52 1.57 0.00 65.70 Water 5.87 65.71 71.58 0.61 0.01 91.24 Construction' 0.00 27.44 27.44 0.00 0.00 28.26 Total Emissions 32.39 1,846.26 1,878.65 2.28 0.09 1,963.70 City of La Quinta CAP and SCAQMD Draft Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No N otes: Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 z Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 3 Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 4 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. s Solid waste includes the CO, and CH, emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. e Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 7 Construction GHG emissions based on a 30 year amortization rate. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 41 April 2022 304 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION b. Less than Significant. The applicable plan for the Project is the City's Greenhouse Gas Plan, which contains goals and supporting measures that reflect and ensure compliance with Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), Senate Bill 32 (SB 32), and the 2017 California Air Resources Board (CARB) Scoping Plan. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) also states that projects that do not exceed the screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are considered to have less -than -significant GHG emissions and are in compliance with the AQMP. As mentioned in Section 3.8.3(a) above, the GHG emissions generated by the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. Based on the foregoing, the Project would not have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.8.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.8.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3.9.1 Sources • City of La Quinta General Plan, February 19, 2013. • Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.laquintaca. qov/home/showpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker. Accessed August 10, 2021, https://www.waterboards.co.gov/. 3.9.2 Environmental Setting The Project site occurs in an area of the City of La Quinta that has undergone gradual urbanization since the later decades of the 1900's. The general area is comprised primarily of residential, recreational, institutional, and commercial development. A unique feature of the City of La Quinta is the inclusion of golf courses within residential neighborhoods and the residential developments surrounding the site often support meandering golf courses. The Project site is surrounded to the north by residential development; to the east by an undeveloped flood control channel with a sports complex and school facilities beyond; to the south by Avenue 50 with undeveloped, vacant land and a golf course beyond; and to the west by Washington Street with residential development and a golf course beyond. The site itself is composed of primarily undeveloped, vacant land and developed portions of adjacent roadways and infrastructure. The site is heavily disturbed due to pedestrian and vehicle traffic associated with surrounding development, historic light grading, and routine weed abatement activities. Historic aerials show these disturbances have been ongoing since at least 1972. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 42 April 2022 305 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.9.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ accident condition involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ❑ ❑ ® ❑ one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency ❑ ❑ ❑ evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death ❑ ❑ ❑ involving wildland fires? a. Less than Significant Impact. Proposed construction activities for the development of the Project may involve the use and transport of hazardous materials, which include but not limited to fuels, gasoline, hydraulic fluid, lubricants, and other liquids associated with the operation of heavy equipment utilized for construction. Additionally, materials that are consistent with building construction would also be present onsite and these materials may include paints, solvents, concrete, adhesives, roofing materials, and others. Additionally, transportation, storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials during construction activities would be required to comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local statues and regulations. This includes the preparation of a SWPPP that would outline specific BMPs that would be administered during the construction of the Project in order to prevent the discharge of construction - related pollutants that could contaminate nearby water sources. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA; 42 USC 6901 et seq.) would require businesses with substantial quantities of hazardous materials to adhere to strict requirements in regard to handlings, transportation, and storing of supplies. Furthermore, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq. protects against the risk to life, property, and the environment that are associated with the transportation of hazardous materials in intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce. Upon completion of the proposed construction, all hazardous materials would be removed from the Project site. Therefore, with all Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 43 April 2022 306 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION applicable regulations in place, impacts associated with accidental release of hazardous substances during construction activities would be less than significant. Long-term operations of the Project would involve limited use of substances typically associated with individual households. Typical materials would include paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil. The Project would be required to comply with Federal, State, and local regulations to ensure proper use, storage, emission, and disposal of hazardous substances. With mandatory regulatory compliance, the Project is not expected to pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, storage, emission, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would the Project increase the potential for accident conditions which could result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Impacts would be less than significant. b. Less than Significant Impact. Accidents involving hazardous materials that could pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment would be highly unlikely during the construction and long-term operation of the Project and are not reasonably foreseeable. As discussed above under Section 3.9.3(a), the transport, use, and handling of hazardous materials on the Project site during construction is a standard risk on all construction sites, and there would be no greater risk for upset and accidents than would occur on any other similar construction site. Upon buildout, the Project site would operate as a residential use. Based on the operational characteristics of residential uses, there is limited use of hazardous substances; however, as discussed above under Section 3.9.3(a), the Project Applicant would be required to comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal regulations related to the transport, handling, and usage of hazardous material. Accordingly, impacts associated with the accidental release of hazardous materials would be less than significant during both construction and long-term operation of the Project. C. Less than Significant Impact. The nearest school to the Project site is Harry S Truman Elementary School located at 78870 Avenue 50. The school is within 0.25-mile to the east of the proposed Project site. Due to the nature of the proposed use of the Project as a residential development, there would be limited use of hazardous substances. In addition, as previously mentioned under Section 3.9.3 (a), the Project would be required to comply with Federal, State, and local regulations to ensure proper storage, use, emission, and disposal of hazardous substances. Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on schools within a quarter mile of the site. d. No Impact. According to the Department of Toxic Control Substances (DTCS), there are no Federal Superfund sites within the vicinity of the Project site. All environmental cleanups and any permitted hazardous material facilities are listed in the Envirostor database, including Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Lability Act (CERLA) sites as well. Additionally, according to the California State Water Resources Control Board's GeoTracker, the Project site is not located within any cleanup sites. The nearest cleanup site is the La Quinta Country Club, located at 77750 Avenue 50, which is approximately 0.71-mile west from the Project site. The La Quinta Country Club contained a potential contaminant of concern: gasoline. However, the case has been closed as of February 4, 1992. Therefore, the Project is not located on or within the vicinity of a site that is listed as a hazardous materials site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Thus, the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. No impact would occur. e. No Impact. The closest airport to the Project site is the Bermuda Dunes Airport, which is approximately 4.1 miles northeast of the Project site. The Project site is not located within the Airport Influence Area and not Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 44 April 2022 307 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION within the Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones. Therefore, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area. No impact would occur. f. No Impact. The Project site does not contain any emergency facilities under existing conditions, nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route, so there is no potential for the Project to adversely affect an existing emergency response or evacuation plan. During construction and at Project buildout, the proposed Project would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles as required by the City. As part of the City's discretionary review process, the City of La Quinta would review the Project to ensure that appropriate emergency ingress and egress would be available to -and -from the proposed dwelling units for public safety. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur. No Impact. According to Map My County, the Project site is not located within a State Responsibility Area (SRA) or a Local Responsibility Area (LRA). The Project site and its surrounding areas are not located within a very high fire hazard area. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No impact would occur. 3.9.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.9.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 3.10.1 Sources • Egan Civil, Preliminary Hydrology Study for Troutdale Village, January 22, 2023. (Appendix F) • Egan Civil, Troutdale Village Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, January 2023. (Appendix G) • FEMA Flood Map Service Center, 2022. • Coachella Valley Water District, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, 2020. 3.10.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is undeveloped and 100% pervious under existing conditions. The Project site is bound to the south and west with fully improved public streets and storm drain facilities. The existing site is not subject to off -site storm flows and there is no existing on -site retention of storm flow. The proposed impervious area is 65% of the Project site. The new improvements would include paved access around the interior of the site, 11 residential buildings with 284 units, paved parking, storm drain, and water and sewer improvements. Two retention basins would be constructed at the west end of the site to collect and store storm runoff generated during the 100-year design storm per City of La Quinta Drainage Ordinance requirements. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 45 April 2022 308 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.10.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY —Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such ❑ ❑ ® ❑ that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course ❑ ❑ ® ❑ of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: c.i.) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- ❑ ❑ ® ❑ site; c.ii.) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ offsite; c.iii.) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater ❑ ❑ ® ❑ drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or c.iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater ❑ ❑ ® ❑ management plan? a. Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the Project would be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater regulations for construction which are required when there is a soil disturbance of more than one acre. The Applicant will be required to comply with all rules, regulations, and procedures of the NPDES permit for municipal, construction, and industrial activities as outlined by the California State Water Resources Control Board or any of its Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Colorado River Basin — Region 7). A Project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must also be prepared to determine and describe the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented on the Project site. The Project would be required to meet all applicable water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, thus avoiding any violation of such standards or requirements. Any future development and construction of the Project would require compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management (SCAQMD) Rule 403 and 403.1. SCAQM Rule 403 requires the implementation of best available dust control measures (BACM) during active operations that are capable of generating fugitive dust, such as the construction of the proposed Project. SCAQMD Rule 403.1 is a supplemental rule to 403, which applies only to fugitive dust sources that occur in the Coachella Valley. This rule will assist in reducing fugitive dust and resulting PM10 emissions from man-made sources in the Coachella Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 46 April 2022 309 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Valley. Although, these rules are intended to protect air quality, they would also assist in supporting water quality protection by preventing sediment track out and erosion. Additionally, a Project specific WQMP (Appendix G) was prepared to determine and describe the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented on the Project site to address pollutants of concern that may potentially be generated from the use of the Project site. Per the WQMP, the BMP's have been selected and implemented to comply with WQMP Section 3.5 and consists of site design BMP concepts, source control, LID/site design and, if/where necessary, treatment control BMPs. Furthermore, the WQMP prepared for the proposed Project would be required to collect and store 100% of the runoff generated during the 100-year storm event on -site per City of La Quinta Drainage Ordinance. The on -site retention basins will be designed in a manner that allows the stored volume generated from the 100-year design storm event to completely evacuate via percolation into the soil within a 72-hour period. Therefore, the proposed Project would not violate any water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality. Impacts would be less than significant. b. No potable groundwater wells are proposed by the Project and the Project would be served with potable water by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The primary source of water in the Coachella Valley is groundwater extracted by deep wells and replenished with Colorado River water. The CVWD would provide domestic water service to the Project and is a participant in the Coachella Valley Regional Water Management Group that prepared an Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (WMP) in 2018. The 2018 Integrated Regional WMP determined that long-term regional demand for potable water is expected to increase; however, with continued conservation measures and replenishment of groundwater, it is projected that there will be sufficient supplies available to meet the CVWD demand. Based on the 2018 Integrated Regional WMP projected supply and demand numbers, the CVWD would have a sufficient water supply to serve the Project's water demands. At Project buildout, water would be required to serve the needs of the proposed development of 284 dwelling units. The Project would connect to an existing water line on Avenue 50. No additional water infrastructure or new wells are proposed. The Project would be required to comply with the CVWD's and the City's water -efficiency requirements, such as including the use of drought -tolerant planting materials and limited landscaping irrigation. The Project would also be required to comply with the CVWD's drought restrictions and water reduction measures as applicable. Therefore, compliance and implementation of CVWD and City requirements would ensure that the Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Impacts would be less than significant. c. i-iv. Less than Significant Impact. Prior to development of the Project site, the City will review and approve the proposed civil plans to ensure the proposed development is in compliance with the City's Municipal Code, which requires the Project to retain the runoff volume from a 100-year, 24-hour storm event for the entire Project site. In addition, the Project's WQMP (Appendix G), includes BMPs, both of which are requirements for the City's NPDES implementation. The implementation of BMPs would allow for the reduction in pollutants of concern and help reduce the impacts both short and long term of water quality during the construction and operation of the Project. The implementation of BMPs is consistent with the Project - specific WQMP and complies with City requirements would ensure the design of the Project would not Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 47 April 2022 310 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION result in erosion or siltation on- or off -site. The Project would result in a less than significant impact to downstream water bodies. d. Less than Significant Impact. The majority of the Project site is not located within a flood zone; however, the eastern side of the Project site is located within the U.S Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone AE due to the Project site being adjacent to the Coachella Water District's Whitewater River Storm Water Channel. CVWD provided a letter dated April 5, 2022, which stated approval on the 75-foot setback. Therefore, no channel improvements would be required for the Project. Furthermore, the Project site is not located within the vicinity of any other water bodies. Due to the Project site location being far away from the ocean, lakes, or dams, there is no possibility of dam failure, tsunami or seiche. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e. Less than Significant Impact. As described in Section 2.10.3 (b), projected Project water demand does not exceed the projected water supply per the 2018Integrated Regional WMP. There would be sufficient water supplies to serve the Project. The Project will adhere to all applicable water quality standards and will implement a Project specific WQMP (Appendix G) approved by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for both construction and operational activities. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.10.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.10.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.11 Land Use and Planning 3.11.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.loquintaca. qov/home/showpublisheddocument/158581635338594527270000 3.11.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is designated as "Medium/High Density Residential" per the City's General Plan 2035 Land Use Map and is zoned as "Medium High Density Residential (RMH)" and within the Affordable Housing Overlay per the City's Official Zoning Map. The Applicant proposes a Change of Zone to change the site's zoning designation to "High Density Residential (RH)." Under existing conditions, the Project site is bordered by a residential community located immediately north; to the west, the Project site is bordered by Washington Street and beyond is a residential community; to the east, the Project site is bordered by a dry channel and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land; and to the south, the Project site is bordered by Avenue 50 and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 48 April 2022 311 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ N b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific ❑ ❑ ® ❑ plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact Development of the Project would not physically disrupt or divide the arrangement of an established community. Under existing conditions, the Project site is bordered by a residential community located immediately north; to the west, the Project site is bordered by Washington Street and beyond is a residential community; to the east, the Project site is bordered by a dry channel and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land; and to the south, the Project site is bordered by Avenue 50 and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land. No impact would occur. b. Less Than Significant Impact The development of the Project would consist of 284 residential homes. Under existing conditions, the Project site is designated as "Medium/High Density Residential" per the City's General Plan 2035 Land Use Map and zoned "Medium High Density Residential (RMH)" and within the Affordable Housing Overlay per the City's Official Zoning Map. Because the Project would be consistent with the underlying General Plan land use designation, the Project would not conflict with the City's General Plan. As previously mentioned, the Applicant has applied for a Change of Zone, which requests to amend the Zoning Ordinance to change the underlying zone of the Project site from RMH to RH. Approval of the Change of Zone would inherently create consistency with the City's zoning designation. Prior to the development of the Project site, the City would review and approve the proposed architectural plans to ensure the proposed development meets the City's development standards for the Medium/High Density Residential land use and High Density Residential zone. Therefore, the Project would be developed in accordance with the proposed density requirement, zoning designation, and would comply with all applicable policies contained in the General Plan and all applicable development regulations and standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The Project also would not conflict with any applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the SCAQMD's AQMP, SCAG's Connect SoCal, and SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.11.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 49 April 2022 312 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.12 Mineral Resources 3.12.1 Sources City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 3.12.2 Environmental Setting The majority of the City of La Quinta is located in mineral resource zone 1 (MRZ-1), which indicates that little likelihood exists for the presence of significant mineral resources. The western portion of the City is located in MRZ-3, which are areas containing known or inferred mineral occurrences of undetermined mineral resources significances. According to Exhibit III-11, Mineral Resource Zone Map, of the City's General Plan EIR, the Project site is located within MRZ-1. 3.12.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? a-b. Less Than Significant Impact. According to the City's General Plan EIR, the Project site is located in an MRZ-1 zone, which indicates it is located in an area where there is little likelihood for presence of significant mineral resources. The Project site is currently designated Medium/High Density under the City's General Plan and zoned Medium High Density Residential. Neitherthe existing land use or zoning designation allow for mineral production. In addition, the General Plan consists of several policies that would protect mineral resources and prevent land use incompatibility impacts from mining. Furthermore, if a potential mineral extraction operation were to be located within the Project site, it would be incompatible both with the land use designation and surrounding land uses. Therefore, development of the Project would result in a less than significant impact relating to mineral resources. 3.12.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 50 April 2022 313 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.12.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.13 Noise 3.13.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Apartment Project Noise Impact Study, January 12, 2022. (Appendix D) 3.13.2 Environmental Setting Noise Noise has been defined as an unwanted sound. Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm, or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A -weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Vibration According to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment Manual, vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of room surfaces is called structure -borne noise. Sources of ground -borne vibrations include natural or human made causes. In addition, vibration sources may be continuous, such as factory machinery, or transient, such as explosions. There are several different methods that are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal. The PPV is most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings. Human body responds to average vibration amplitude often described as the root mean square (RMS). The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal and is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body. Decibel notation (VdB) is commonly used to measure RMS. Decibel notation (VdB) serves to reduce the range of numbers used to describe human response to vibration. Typically, ground -borne vibration generated by man-made activities attenuates rapidly with distance from the source of the vibration. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 51 April 2022 314 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.13.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards ❑ ❑ ® ❑ established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ground borne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a ❑ ❑ ❑ public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? a. Less than Significant Impact. Project construction noise would occur due to the use of equipment that includes a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that when combined can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment is expected to occur in stages such as site preparation, grading, building construction, and architectural coating. To describe the Project construction noise levels, measurements were collected for similar activities at several construction sites. Since the reference noise levels were collected at varying distances, all construction noise level measurements presented in Table 6 of Appendix D, have been adjusted to describe a uniform reference distance of 50 feet. Construction Noise Analysis Construction noise is considered a short-term impact and would be considered significant if construction activities are taken outside the allowable times (7 AM to 7 PM) as described in LQMC Section 6.08.050(A). Construction is anticipated to occur during permissible hours. Construction noise will have a temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise level above the existing within the Project vicinity. Furthermore, noise reduction measures are provided to further reduce construction noise. The impact is considered less than significant. Construction noise level projections are provided below. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Noise levels will be loudest during the grading phase. A likely worst -case construction noise scenario during grading assumes the use of a grader, a dozer, two (2) excavators, two (2) backhoes, and a scraper operating at 290 feet from the nearest sensitive receptor (north residences). Assuming a usage factor of 40 percent for each piece of equipment, unmitigated noise levels at 290 feet have the potential to reach 70 dBA Leq and 74 dBA Lmax at the nearest sensitive receptors during grading. Noise levels for the other construction phases would be lower and range between 63 to 66 dBA. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 52 April 2022 315 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Off -Site Traffic Noise Analysis Traffic generated by the operation of the Project will influence traffic noise levels in surrounding off -site areas. As previously mentioned, the Project is anticipated to generate approximately 2,079 average daily trips. The modeling is theoretical and does not take into account any existing barriers, structures, and/or topographical features that may further reduce noise levels. Therefore, the levels are shown for comparative purposes only to show the difference in with and without project conditions. In addition, the noise contours for 60, 65 and 70 dBA CNEL were calculated. The potential off -site noise impacts caused by an increase of traffic from operation of the proposed project on the nearby roadways were calculated for the following scenarios: Existing without Project and Existing with Project. Table 8 compares the two scenarios and shows the change in traffic noise levels as a result of the proposed Project. It takes a change of 3 dB or more to hear a perceptible difference. Table 8 Off -Site Traffic Noise Levels CNEL at 60 Feet dBA1,2 Existing Existing Change Potential Segment Without With in Significant Roadway Project Project Noise Impact Level Washington St Eisenhower Dr to Avenue 50 69.7 69.9 0.2 No Avenue 50 Washington St to Jefferson St 1 67.6 1 67.7 1 0.1 No Notes: Exterior noise levels calculated at 5 feet above ground level. Z Noise levels calculated from centerline of subject roadway. As shown on Table 8, the maximum change in noise level generated from the Project is 0.2 dBA. Therefore, noise impacts to off -site receptors due to Project -generated trips would be less than significant. On -Site Traffic Noise Analysis Traffic noise from the local roadway network was evaluated and compared to the City's noise compatibility matrix. Per the City's Land Use Compatibility (LQMC Section 9.100.210), multi -family residential is conditionally acceptable up to 65 dBA CNEL. As shown in Table 5 of Appendix D, traffic 70 dBA CNEL noise projections from Washington Street will reach up to 173 feet from the centerline of the roadway. Residential structures are located approximately 180 feet away from Washington Street centerline and fall within the 70 to 65 dBA CNEL contour of the roadway and are located within the conditionally acceptable region for multiple -family residential. In order to ensure interior levels of 45 dBA CNEL, all residential windows would be designed with sound transmission class (STC) ratings of 28 to achieve a 25 dB reduction, as described in Mitigation Measure N0I-1, below. With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1, on -site traffic noise would be reduced to a less than significant impact. b. Less than Significant Impact The Project does not propose or require uses or activities that would be considered substantive sources of on -going vibration. For the purposes of this analysis, and to substantiate whether the Project would result in "exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels," applicable criteria developed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) were employed. The Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual indicates that received vibration levels of 0.10 Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) (equal to 0.071 Root Mean Square Amplitude [RMS]) could be strongly perceptible (Caltrans Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 53 April 2022 316 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans) September 2013, p. 38). For the purposes of this analysis, received vibration levels exceeding 0.10 PPV (0.071 RMS) would be considered potentially significant. Ground borne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring within the Project site were estimated by using data published by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Typical Project construction equipment would generate vibration levels of 0.003 PPV (small bulldozer) to 0.089 PPV (larger bulldozer) as measured at 25 feet. As with received noise levels, received vibration levels attenuate with distance. In general, manmade ground -borne vibrations attenuate rapidly with distance from the source. At a distance of 290 feet, a large bulldozer would yield a worst -case 0.006 peak particle velocity (PPV) (in/sec) which is below the threshold of perception and any risk of damage. Therefore, the Project would not result in or cause exposure of persons to, or generation of, excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise. Impacts would be less than significant. C. No Impact The nearest airport to the Project site is the Bermuda Dunes Airport, located approximately 4.1 miles northeast of the Project site. The Project site is not located within the airport influence area boundary. Furthermore, the noise compatibility contours provided in the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (RCALUCP) show that the Project site is outside of the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour for the Bermuda Dunes Airport. Therefore, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels associated with airports. No impact would occur. 3.13.4 Mitigation N0I-1 Prior to building permit issuance, the Project Applicant shall ensure all residential windows be designed with sound transmission class (STC) 28 to achieve a 25 dB reduction. 3.13.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1, all Project -related noise impacts would be reduced to less - than -significant levels. 3.14 Population and Housing 3.14.1 Sources • United States Census Bureau, Quickfacts. July 1, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/laguintacitycalifornia/PST045219 3.14.2 Environmental Setting According to the United States Census Bureau, the City of La Quinta had a population of 37,558 in 2020, and the population increased by 0.2% from 2010. The number of households from 2016-2020 was 16,292 with an average household size at 2.55 persons per household. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 54 April 2022 317 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.14.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? a. Less than Significant Impact. The Project Applicant proposes the future development of 284 residences on 14.03 acres of undeveloped land. According to the United States Census Bureau, the person per household from 2016-2020 in the City of La Quinta is 2.55, which calculates to an estimate of 724 residents. This only leads to a negligible increase in population and is consistent with current population growth projections. Furthermore, the Project site is surrounded to the north and west by residential homes and would be accessible via existing roads and infrastructure. No roads or infrastructure would need to be extended to serve the Project. Because the anticipated increase in population based on the proposed residences would be negligible, within current population growth projections, and induced population growth is also expected to be negligible. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b. No Impact. The proposed development of 284 residences would take place on a vacant parcel. No structures or housing will be eliminated as a result of the Project and no persons would be displaced. Therefore, there would be no impacts relating to the displacement of people or housing. 3.14.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.14.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.15 Public Services 3.15.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.loguintaca.govlhome/showpublisheddocument/158581635338594527270000 Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 55 April 2022 318 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.15.2 Environmental Setting Fire Protection Services Fire protection is provided through a contract with the Riverside County Fire Department. There are three City - owned fire stations, each staffed with full-time paid and volunteer firefighters: Fire Station No. 32 at 78-111 Avenue 52; Fire Station No. 70 at 54001 Madison Street; and Fire Station No. 93 at 44-555 Adams Street. Emergency response in the City is also available through Riverside County Fire Department stations in other cities. These include Station No. 55, located in Indian Wells; Station No. 88, in Indio; and Station No. 39, located at the Desert Resorts Airport, east of the City's eastern Sphere of Influence. County Fire dispatches all calls through its centralized Emergency Command Center, where responding stations are determined based on location and need. Average Fire Department response times are between 5 and 7 minutes. La Quinta has an Insurance Service Office (ISO) of 4, based on a scale of 1 through 10, with 1 being the highest rating. Ratings are reviewed periodically. A variety of criteria are used to determine the ISO rating, such as staffing levels, response times, safety history and building code standards. Police Protection Services Police protection services are provided through contract with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. Riverside County Sheriff's Station is located at 86-625 Airport Boulevard, Thermal, CA 92274. The Civic Center Community Policing Office is located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. Schools There are two school districts providing public education to students in kindergarten through 12th grade in La Quinta: Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) and Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). Developers are required to pay school mitigation fees for residential and commercial development, which includes the proposed Project. Parks The City of La Quinta currently operates 11 City parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. The City of La Quinta also contains one public and 22 privately owned and operated golf courses, seven of which are open and available for public use. The City of La Quinta's designated recreational open space totals approximately 5,259 acres. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 56 April 2022 319 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.15.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new of physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire Protection? ® ❑ ii) Police Protection? LLJ iii) Schools? LLJ iv) Parks? ® ❑ v) Other public facilities? ❑ ® ❑ a-i. Less than Significant Impact Fire protection services in La Quinta are provided through a contract with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). The nearest fire station (No. 32) is located at 78-111 Avenue 52, approximately 1.0-mile southwest from the Project site. Based on the Project site's proximity to the existing fire station, the Project would be adequately served by fire protection services and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. Additionally, the Project would feature fire safety and fire suppression activities, including type of building construction, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, and paved access. The La Quinta Fire Department and/or RCFD will review and approve Project plans to ensure all applicable fire standards and regulations are met. In addition, the Development Impact Fees paid for the project will fund this project's "fair -share" of capital Improvements for Fire that are needed from this development. Therefore, impacts associated with fire protection services would be less than significant. a-ii. Less than Significant Impact The La Quinta Police Department serves under contract by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Community Policing Office is located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, which is located approximately 0.5-mile southwest from the Project site. Based on the Project site's proximity to the existing police station and the Sherriff's Thermal Sub -Station, the Project would be adequately served by police protection services and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. The La Quinta Police Department, through the Riverside County Sheriff Department, will review and approve Project plans to ensure all applicable police standards and regulations are met. In addition, the Development Impact Fees paid for the project will fund this project's "fair -share" of capital Improvements for police that are needed from this development. Therefore, impacts associated with police protection services would be less than significant. a-iii. Less than Significant Impact The nearest school is Harry S Truman Elementary, which is located approximately 0.2-mile east of the Project site at 78870 Avenue 50. The addition of the future 284 homes would not significantly increase the number of students within nearby schools. The Project is required to Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 57 April 2022 320 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION pay the State mandated school impact fees which would assist in mitigating impacts to schools. Therefore, this fee would assure that impacts would be less -than -significant levels. a -iv. Less than Significant Impact The City of La Quinta requires new developments to dedicate land for recreational purposes or pay in -lieu fees and payment of Development Impact Fees. The Project would result in a negligible population increase and a negligible demand for park facilities. Therefore, this fee will assure that the impacts to City parks would be less than significant. a-v. Less than Significant Impact The Project would result in less than significant impacts to other public facilities. It is not expected that the Project would result in an increase in population that would require the provision of additional public facilities within the City of La Quinta. Access to the Project site is provided by existing roads and would connect to existing utility infrastructure. New public roads or public transportation facilities, or other public facilities, are not required. Regardless of the negligible impact to public services, the Development Impact Fees will be paid for the Project which will fund this project's "fair -share" of capital Improvements for other public facilities that are needed from this development. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 3.15.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.15.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.16 Recreation 3.16.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.lapuintaca. pov/home/showpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 3.16.2 Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta currently operates 11 City parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. La Quinta's three nature preserves are also available for public recreation, as they all contain trails for hiking and bicycling. There are also a number of public pocket parks located within existing subdivisions. La Quinta is home to one public and 22 privately owned and operated golf courses, seven of which are open and available for public use. La Quinta's designated recreational open space totals approximately 5,259 acres. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 58 April 2022 321 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.16.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a/b. Less than Significant Impact. The Project's development of 284 dwelling units would result in a negligible population increase and a negligible demand for park facilities. Since the Project will provide a pickleball court, pool and spa, barbeque areas, multiple open recreational spaces, and a dog park, there is a low potential for the Project to increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur, as well as a low potential for construction or expansion of recreational facilities which may have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Furthermore, because the Project is consistent with the existing land use and zoning designation, the City's General Plan has already accommodated for the new residents from this Project. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on recreational facilities within the City. 3.16.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. 3.16.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.17 Transportation 3.17.1 Sources Integrated Engineering Group, Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis, December 2021. (Appendix E) 3.17.2 Environmental Setting The Project trip generation was calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition). It is estimated that the Project would generate 1,684 total daily trips, 109 AM peak hour trips and 134 PM peak hour trips. Project trip distribution and assignment were developed in coordination with the City of La Quinta staff based on the land use characteristics of the proposed Project and surrounding area, existing travel patterns within the study area, anticipated travel patterns to and from the Project site, and approved projects located in the Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 59 April 2022 322 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION vicinity of the Project site. Per the City of La Quinta VMT Analysis Policy (June 2021), the Project qualifies for the small project screening criterion as an affordable housing project. The SunLine Transit Agency (STA) is the main transit agency servicing the City of La Quinta. Currently, STA operates Route 7 within the vicinity of the project. Route 7 operates seven days a week and connects to Indian Wells and Palm Desert north of the site. Weekday and weekend service frequency is 90 minutes. Bus stops for Route 7 are currently located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 for northbound service and at the southwest corner for southbound service. Pedestrian accessibility and connectivity from the Project site to these bus stops is provided along the east and west sides of Washington Street with signalized crossings at the intersection where the bus stops are located. Pedestrian crosswalks are generally provided at signalized intersections along Washington Street with sidewalks on the east side. Buffered Class II bike lanes are provided in both directions along Washington Street and along the south side along Avenue 50, east of the Project site. 3.17.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated TRANSPORTATION — Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with ❑ ❑ ® ❑ CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous ❑ ❑ ® ❑ intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access ❑ ❑ ® ❑ a. Less than Significant Impact. Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. The Project's Traffic Report (Appendix E) utilized the trip generation rates for multi -family housing for low-rise and mid -rise homes provided in the Institute of Engineers Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition. As shown in the modeling conducted by IEG, through use of the ITE trip generation rates, the Project is anticipated to generate approximately 1,684 total daily trips, 109 AM peak hour trips, and 134 PM peak hour trips. IEG conducted analyses for two scenarios: Existing Conditions (2021), Project Completion Year (2023) (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Project) Conditions, Cumulative (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project) Conditions. As shown in Table 9, Existing Conditions (2021) Intersection Analysis, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Existing Year (2021) Conditions. Therefore, no improvements are required Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 60 April 2022 323 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Table 9 Existing Conditions (2021) Intersection Analysis Intersection Intersection Control Existing Conditions Delay (a) LCIS (b) AM/PM Peak 1. Washington Street & Avenue 50 Signalized 20.7/16.4 C/B 2. Washington Street & Eisenhower Drive Signalized 15.0/13.7 B/B 3. Washington Street & Avenue 48 Signalized 13.2/11.9 B/B Notes: (a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds/vehicle. (b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition and performed using Synchro 10 The second scenario, Project Completion (2023) was analyzed with a two percent annual growth factor for two years applied to the existing counts. As shown in Table 10, Project Completion (2023) Intersection Analysis, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Project Completion (2023) conditions. Therefore, no additional improvements are required. Table 10 Project Completion (2023) Intersection Analysis Intersection Existing Conditions Project Completion Conditions Delay (a) LOS (b) Delay (a) LOS (b) AM Peak/PM Peak 1. Washington Street & Avenue 50 20.7/16.4 C/B 22.2/17.4 C/B 2. Washington Street & Eisenhower Drive 15.0/13.7 B/B 16.3/14.7 B/B 3. Washington Street & Avenue 48 13.2/11.9 B/B 14.6/12.7 B/B Notes: (a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds/vehicle. At unsignalized intersections, delay refers to the worst movement. (b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition and performed using Synchro 10 The third scenario analyzed is Cumulative (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project). The Cumulative Conditions traffic volumes were developed by adding cumulative project trips to the Project Completion Conditions traffic volumes. As shown in Table 11, Cumulative Intersection Analysis, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Cumulative Conditions. Therefore, no additional improvements are required. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 61 April 2022 324 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Table 11 Cumulative Intersection Analysis Intersection Existing Conditions Cumulative Conditions Delay (a) LOS (b) Delay (a) LOS (b) 1. Washington Street & Avenue 50 20.7/16.4 C/B 22.4/17.7 C/B 2. Washington Street & Eisenhower Drive 15.0/13.7 B/B 16.4/14.8 B/B 3. Washington Street & Avenue 48 13.2/11.9 B/B 14.8/12.8 B/B Notes: (a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds/vehicle. At unsignalized intersection, delay refers to the worst movement. (b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition and performed using Synchro 10 As previously mentioned in Section 3.17.2, STA operates Route 7 within the vicinity of the Project site. Bus stops for Route 7 are currently located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 for northbound service and at the southwest corner for southbound service Pedestrian accessibility and connectivity to and from the Project is provided along the east and west sides of Washington Street with signalized crossings at the intersection where the bus stops are located. Existing bike lanes are located along the Project site's frontage with Washington Street and along the south side of Avenue 50, east of the Project site. The Project would not interfere with the existing bus stops, sidewalks, and bike lanes. In conclusion, the Project would not conflict with the City's General Plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Impacts would be less than significant. b. Less than Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 sets forth guidelines for implementing Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) for reduction of GHG emissions and development of multimodal transportation networks. SB 743 requires amendments to the CEQA Guidelines to provide for an alternative criteria to the LOS methodology for evaluating transportation impacts. Generally, "vehicle miles travelled" or VMT is considered as the most appropriate measurement of transportation impacts. VMT refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. Per the City of La Quinta VMT Analysis Policy and screening criteria for development projects, the proposed Project, consisting of 284 multifamily units of which 70 units are affordable housing units, can be presumed to not have a significant transportation related CEQA impact by qualifying for small and local serving projects screening criteria as affordable housing. Furthermore, as discussed in the GHG section above, the project is estimated to generate less than 3,000 MTCO2e, which also qualifies for screening criteria. Therefore, Project impacts related to VMT would be less than significant. c/d Less than Significant Impact. The types of traffic generated from the Project (i.e., passenger cars) would be compatible with the type of traffic observed along roadways within the Project vicinity under existing conditions. In addition, prior to development of the Project site, the City will review and approve the proposed architectural plans to ensure all proposed improvements within the public right-of-way would be installed in conformance with City Design Standards and that no hazardous transportation design features would be introduced through implementation of the Project. In addition, the Riverside County Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 62 April 2022 325 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Fire Department, City Fire Services, and the City Police Department will review the proposed site plan to ensure that all safety design features and measures related to emergency access and geometric design are compliant with existing standards prior to final Project approval. Accordingly, the Project would not create or substantially increase safety hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use or result in inadequate emergency access. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.17.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.17.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 3.18.1 Sources PaleoWest, Cultural Resource Investigation in Support of the Troutdale Village Project, April 25, 2022. (Appendix C) AB 52 Tribal Consultation Letters 3.18.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is situated east of the Peninsular Ranges in the southern extent of the Coachella Valley at the western edge of the Colorado Desert. The Coachella Valley is bordered by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa mountains (part of the Peninsular Ranges) to the southwest and by the low, rolling Indio and Mecca hills to the northeast. From the steep slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains, the desert floor descends suddenly at less than 3 kilometers (2 miles) eastward to sea level in the city of Indio, where the Project site is located. PaleoWest contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on October 19, 2021, for a review of the sacred lands file (SLF). The NAHC responded on November 30, 2021, stating that the SLF was completed with negative results; however, the NAHC requested that 16 individuals representing 11 Native American tribal groups be contacted to elicit information regarding cultural resource issues related to the proposed Project. PaleoWest sent outreach letters to the 11 recommended tribal groups on December 21, 2021. These letters were followed up by phone calls on January 12, 2022. To date five Tribes have responded to the notification letters: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Quechan Historic Preservation Department, Los Coyote Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, and Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 63 April 2022 326 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.18.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of ❑ ® ❑ ❑ historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section ❑ ® ❑ ❑ 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. a.i. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated As previously discussed in Section 3.5.3(a) and (b), the Project site contains two previously recorded prehistoric archeological sites, which have been combined by PaleoWest into one resource: 33-001180. The resource likely represents a Late Prehistoric Period habitation site, much of which has been destroyed by development in the surrounding area. PaleoWest concluded after a Phase II investigation that the portion of Site 33-001180 in the Project area does not contribute to the overall eligibility of the site for listing on the CRHR. However, due to the sensitivity in the area, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would be implemented to ensure historical and archaeological resources would be less than significant. a.ii. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated As previously mentioned in Section 3.18.2, PaleoWest contacted the NAHC on October 19, 2021, for review of the SLF. The NAHC responded on November 30, 2021, stating that the SLF was completed with negative results; however, the NAHC requested that 16 individuals representing 11 Native American tribal groups be contacted to elicit information regarding cultural resource issues related to the Project. PaleoWest sent outreach letters to the 11 recommended tribal groups on December 21, 2021. These letters were followed up by phone calls on January 12, 2022. To date, six Tribes have responded: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Quechan Historic Preservation Department, Los Coyote Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, and Morongo Band of Mission Indians. The Soboba Band of Indians stated the Tribe would defer to the Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. The Quechan Historic Preservation Department sent an email indicating the Tribe does not wish to comment on the Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 64 April 2022 327 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Project and stated they defer to more local tribes. The Environmental Department of the Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians responded that they have no information to share and no comment on the Project. The Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians also stated that the Tribe would like to defer to the closest tribes in that area, Torres -Martinez and Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians. They further noted that the Tribe does not have any comment regarding the Project. The Morongo Band of Mission Indians stated the Project was not located within the boundaries of the ancestral territory and traditional use area of the Cahuilla and Serrano people of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians. The Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians stated that they are not aware of any cultural resources that would be impacted by the Project but would like to be informed if any additional resources, beyond the two resources already identified within the Project site, are identified during development of the Project. A representative of the Ramona Band of Cahuilla requested that the letters be resent for review. The letter was resent to the Tribe on January 12, 2022. On January 28, 2022, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians responded stating that the Project site is located within the Tribe's Traditional Use Area and therefore, requested to monitor during Project construction. On April 19, 2022, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians requested a formal government to government consultation under AB-52, a cultural resources inventory by a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities, a copy of the records search with associated survey reports and site records from the information center, copies of any cultural documentation, a representative from the Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource, and an informational meeting with the developer, lead agency, and archaeologist. There was a joint SB18 and AB52 Revie conducted and on July 21, 2022, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians stated the Troutdale Village project had addressed all the Tribals Historic Preservation Office concerns and proper mitigation measures have been proposed to ensure the protections of tribal cultural resources, thus concluding AB52 consultation efforts. With implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1, as described below, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. 3.18.4 Mitigation TCR-1 Prior to any ground disturbing activities on the Project site, an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be present to monitor the site. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 3.18.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1, impacts regarding tribal cultural resources would remain less than significant. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 65 April 2022 328 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems 3.19.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/158581635338594527270000 3.19.2 Environmental Setting Domestic Water Domestic water for the majority of the City is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). Groundwater is the principal source of municipal water supply in the Coachella Valley. The main groundwater source for the entire valley is the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin, Indio Subbasin, and the Whitewater River Subbasin. The Whitewater River Subbasin underlies a major portion of the valley floor and encompasses approximately 400 square miles. Wastewater CVWD also provides wastewater and sewage collection and treatment services in the City and Sphere of Influence (SOI). CVWD sewer lines utilize a system of trunk lines ranging in diameter from 4 to 24 inches. There are 18-inch diameter force mains in Washington Street, Jefferson Street, Madison Street, and Avenues 50, 58, and 60. There are two CVWD wastewater treatment plants that serve La Quinta. Water Reclamation Plant 7 (WRP-7) is located at Madison Street and Avenue 38, northeast of the City in Indio. It provides wastewater treatment for development in the City north of Miles Avenue. The capacity of WRP-7 is 5 million gallons per day (MGD), and the plant processes approximately 2.8 to 3.0 MGD. It has the capacity to expand to 7.5 MGD. The Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4), located in Thermal, serves lands in the City and SOI that are located south of Miles Avenue. The Mid -Valley plant has a current capacity of just under 10 MGD, and processes approximately 5 MGD. Solid Waste Solid waste disposal services in the City of La Quinta are provided by the commercial vendor, Burrtec. Solid waste collected from the City of La Quinta residents and businesses is hauled to the Edom Hill Transfer Station in Cathedral City and is then transported to Lambs Canyon in the City of Beaumont. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 66 April 2022 329 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.19.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development ❑ ❑ ® ❑ during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid ❑ ❑ ® ❑ waste? a-e. Less than Significant Impact. Domestic Water CVWD provides domestic water services to the Project site. CVWD based its water demand calculations for its UWMP on the City's Anticipated Land Use Plan which the Project will remain consistent with its designated land use. Additionally, the Project would be required to implement all water conservation measures imposed by CVWD under normal and drought conditions over the life of the Project. These include requirements of Executive Order B-29-15, which was issued in 2015 and is still in effect. This Executive Order mandates reductions in water use by 36% in the Coachella Valley. In response to the Executive Order, CVWD has adopted restrictions on water use that include limiting days on which landscaping can be irrigated, a prohibition on the use of fountains or water features, a prohibition on irrigation by any means other than drip or micro -spray systems, and a requirement that hotels offer their guests the option of not having towels and linens laundered daily. Should additional restrictions or regulations be implemented, the Project would be required to comply with them also. No new wells or additional water infrastructure or entitlements will be required. Based on the foregoing, CVWD would be able to fulfill the Project's demand during normal and dry years. Impacts would be less than significant. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 67 April 2022 330 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Wastewater Wastewater generated from the Project site would be treated at either CVWD's WRP 7 or WRP 4, which contains an excess of 2.0 MGD or 5 MGD, respectively. Implementation of the Project would generate wastewater at a rate of 230 gallons per day per dwelling unit. As the Project includes the development of 284 dwelling units, the Project would generate approximately 65,320 gallons per day of wastewater. Therefore, implementation of the Project would result in an approximately 3.3 percent or 1.3 percent of the total capacity of wastewater treated at WRP 7 or WRP 4, respectively. This increase is considered minimal as these plants currently treat approximately 5 MGD (WRP 7) or 10 MGD (WRP 4) and would not result in a significant impact. StnrmwatPr The City requires on -site retention basins for all new developments to manage surface water flows and reduce runoff from sources such as stormwater and landscape irrigation. The Project complies with this requirement by including two on -site retention basins to ensure stormwater is retained on -site. Additional measures to address onsite stormwater management are described in Section 3.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. Project -related impacts to stormwater management systems are expected to be less than significant. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Snlid WattP Solid waste disposal service for the City would be provided by Burrtec, which is required to meet all local, regional, state, and federal standards for solid waste disposal. Implementation of the Project would generate solid waste at a rate of 12.23 pounds per dwelling unit per year. As the Project includes the development of 284 dwelling units, the Project would generate approximately 1.7 tons of solid waste per year. Solid waste generated at the Project site would be transported to the Edom Hill Transfer Station in northern Cathedral City and disposed of at Lamb Canyon Landfill in the City of Beaumont, which has a remaining capacity of 19.2 million cubic yards (2015). Due to the small scale of the Project, the Lamb Canyon Landfill has more than enough capacity to serve the proposed Project. Furthermore, Burrtec is required to meet all local, regional, state, and federal standards for solid waste disposal. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.19.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.19.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.20 Wildfire 3.20.1 Sources California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), Map of CAL FIRE's Fire Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Areas — Western Riverside County, December 24, 2009. Accessed August 13, 2021 https://osfm.fire. ca. pov/media/6754/fhszl map60.pdf Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 68 April 2022 331 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION • CAL FIRE, Fire Hazard Severity Zones in SRA, November 7, 2007. Accessed August 31, 2021 https.11osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6752/fhszs map60.pdf 3.20.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is located within an area of the City that is somewhat developed. According to CAL FIRE maps, the Project site is not located within a very high fire hazard severity zone or a fire hazard severity zone in a State Responsibility Area (SRA). 3.20.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated WILDFIRE — If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response ❑ ❑ ❑ plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project ❑ ❑ ❑ occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may ❑ ❑ ❑ exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or ❑ ❑ ❑ landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? The Project site is not located in or near SRA or lands within a very high fire hazard severity zone; therefore, the Project would not exacerbate wildfire hazard risks or expose people or the environment to adverse environmental effects related to wildfires. As such, no impact would occur. 3.20.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.20.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 3.21.1 Sources All sources previously listed were used to support the conclusions made in this section. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 69 April 2022 332 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.21.2 Environmental Setting The environmental setting for the project site is summarized within Sections 2.1 through 2.20 of the Initial Study for each environmental issue. 3.21.3 Impacts Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, ❑ ® ❑ ❑ reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection ❑ ® ❑ ❑ with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ❑ ® ❑ ❑ either directly or indirectly? a. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. All impacts to the environment, including impacts to habitat for fish and wildlife species, fish and wildlife populations, plant and animal communities, rare and endangered plants and animals, and historical and pre -historical resources were evaluated as part of this Initial Study. Throughout this Initial Study, where impacts were determined to be potentially significant, mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce those impacts to less than significant. Accordingly, with incorporation of the mitigation measures imposed throughout this Initial Study, the Project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation incorporated. b. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The environmental evaluation of this Initial Study concluded that, with adherence to all mitigation measures, the Project's cumulatively considerable impacts would be mitigated to less than significant levels. c. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project could result in environmental impacts to humans directly or indirectly. All Project environmental impacts would be less than significant or less than Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 70 April 2022 333 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION significant with mitigation incorporated. The Project would, therefore, not result in environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 3.21.4 Mitigation B10-1 If unavoidable, Project construction activities must begin during the nesting bird season (February 1st through August 31st), a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal activities. The nesting pre - construction bird survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with identification of avian species known to occur in Riverside County. The nesting bird survey shall be conducted on foot inside the project boundary, including a 300-foot buffer for passerines (songbirds) and a 500-foot buffer for raptors in areas of suitable habitat. Inaccessible areas will be surveyed using binoculars to the extent practical. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (dependent upon species, the proposed work activity, the existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. If a raptor nest is observed in a tree proposed for removal, the applicant must consult with CDFW. All construction personnel shall be notified of the existence of the buffer zone and avoid entering the buffer zone during nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer area until the avian biologist has confirmed the breeding/nesting is completed and the young have fledged. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist. B10-2 The Applicant shall pay the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to building permit issuance. CUL-1 A qualified archaeologist monitor shall be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project construction phase. In the case that archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbing activities, work in the area shall cease and any deposits shall be treated according to Federal, State, and local guidelines. No further grading is permitted in the area of the discovery until the City approves the appropriate measure to protect the discovered resources. CUL-2 In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground disturbing activities on the project site, no further disturbance shall occur, and all work shall cease until the County Coroner has made a determination of the origin and disposition of the remains. Ground disturbing activities and excavations shall not resume until the following has been addressed: 1. The County Coroner has been contacted and determined that no investigation to the cause of death is required, and 2. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are of Native American decent, the Coroner must notify Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will then determine the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. GEO-1 Prior to the start of the proposed Project activities, all field personnel will receive a worker's environmental awareness training on paleontological resources. The training will provide a description of the laws and ordinances protecting fossil resources, the types of fossil resources that may be Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 71 April 2022 334 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION encountered in the Project area, the role of the paleontological monitor, outlines steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made and provides contact information for the Project Paleontologist. The training will be developed by the Project Paleontologist and can be delivered concurrent with other training including cultural, biological, safety, etc. GEO-2 Prior to the commencement of ground -disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist will be retained to prepare and implement a PRMMP for the proposed Project. The PRMMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into older Quaternary (Pleistocene) age sediments and the location of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential. Part-time monitoring, or spot checking, may be required during shallow ground -disturbances (< 10 feet below ground surface) to confirm that sensitive geologic units are not being impacted. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. GEO-3 In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and, if appropriate, collected. If the resource is determined to be of scientific significance, the Project Paleontologist shall complete the following: Salvage of Fossils. If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or Project Paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the Project Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological as outlined in the PRMMP prepared for the project. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case, the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner. Fossil Preparation and Curation. The PRMMP will identify the museum that has agreed to accept fossils that may be discovered during project -related excavations. Upon completion of fieldwork, all significant fossils collected will be prepared in a properly equipped laboratory to a point ready for curation. Preparation may include the removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing or repairing specimens. During preparation and inventory, the fossils specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level practical prior to curation at an accredited museum. The fossil specimens must be delivered to the accredited museum or repository no later than 90 days after all fieldwork is completed. The cost of curation will be assessed by the repository and will be the responsibility of the client. GEO-4 Upon completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the Project Paleontologist should prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report should include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated. TCR-1 Prior to any ground disturbing activities on the Project site, an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be present to monitor the site. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 72 April 2022 335 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION notify a qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 3.21.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With incorporation of the above -mentioned mitigation measures, all Project -related impacts in regard to Mandatory Findings of Significance would be reduced to less than significant. Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 73 April 2022 336 5 REFERENCES Chapter 4 Report Preparers Lead Agency Carlos Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 The Altum Group Rich Malacoff, AICP Subconsultants Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise Mike Dickerson, INCE, Principal — MD Acoustics Tyler Klassen, Air Quality Specialist — MD Acoustics Francisco Irarrazabal, Acoustical Consultant— MD Acoustics Biological Resources Travis McGill, Director — ELMT Consulting Cultural Resources Roberta Thomas, Senior Archaeologist, M.A., RPA — PaleoWest Archaeology Hydrology, WQMP Benjamin Egan, PE, PLS, Engineer — Egan Civil, Inc. Transportation, VMT George Ghossain, PE, MSCE, MPA, Principal Engineer— Integrated Engineering Group Troutdale Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 74 April 2022 337 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 252-UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBERS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002 SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, AMENDMENT 2) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 APPLICANT: IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on June 27, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Irwin Partners Architects for approval of a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Site Development Permit for a 252-unit apartment project located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, more particularly described as: Assessor Parcel Number: 646-070-016 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 21, 2023, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on March 28, 2023, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider said request and continued said Public Hearing to a date certain of June 27, 2023, to give the applicant time to address the Planning Commission's concerns regarding architectural design, density and height of buildings, parking, and traffic; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on June 27, 2023, hold a continued Public Hearing considering changes to the project as requested and did recommend adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and did not provide a recommendation for approval of the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Site Development Permit due less than super -majority vote approval; and General Plan Amendment 2022-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, City Council did 338 City Council Resolution 2023-XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002; Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2); Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 2 of 7 make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said General Plan Amendment, as conditioned in enclosed Exhibits A and B: 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The amendment is internally consistent with goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan, which are not being amended. The project proposes 252 units, with 74 designated as moderate - income units, on a site that is shown in the Housing Element as 280 low- or very low-income units. An alternate 12.74-acre site to accommodate these 280 very low- to low-income units has been designated and is identified as Site 6 in the draft Housing Element amendment (Exhibit A). The additional site is required to be identified by the Project to comply with Government Code Section 65863, commonly referred to as the state "No Net Loss Law". Site 6 is commercially designated under the City's Community Commercial designation and benefits from the Affordable Housing Overlay, which allow for multi -family residential development. The property not only allows for multi -family residential but mixed -use development as well. The Affordable Housing Overlay allows for a density up to 36 units per acre and mixed -use projects allow for density up to 24 units per acre, however this site is projected at 22 units per acre, which is more consistent with development in the region. The site is within a "High Resource" area, and its proximity to shopping centers at Highway 111 and Washington Street and proximity to schools makes it an ideal site for affordable housing. Additionally, the La Quinta Village Apartment project includes 74 moderate -income level affordable units which would count for the City's RHNA goals. 2. Public Welfare. Approval of the amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. As part of the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be adopted to mitigate any potential impacts. 3. General Plan Compatibility. In the case of amendments to the General Plan policy diagram, no changes are proposed. 4. Property Suitability. In the case of amendments to the General Plan policy diagram, no new designation is proposed. 5. Change in Circumstances. No amendments are proposed to the General Plan policy diagram. Specific Plan Amendment 2022-0001 (Amendment 2 to Specific Plan 2004-071, La Paloma) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, City Council did 339 City Council Resolution 2023-XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002; Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2); Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 3 of 7 make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Specific Plan Amendment, as conditioned [Exhibits C and D]: 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the land use, policies and programs of the General Plan, as it allows for development of a medium high density residential project in the Medium/High Density land use designation, which supports 4-16 units per acre residential density and is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including apartment projects. Approval of the Specific Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare, as the project is consistent with the existing land uses as a multi -family residential development and will be consistent with surrounding residential development and is nearby schools and neighborhood commercial uses. 2. Specific Plan 2022-0001 is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties which are also residential. The project proposes a medium high density residential project and is surrounded by Medium Density Residential land uses, including a vacant site to the south and existing residential to the north. 4. Specific Plan 2022-0001 is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as the project's land use is intended for multi -family residential projects which this project proposes. Site Development Permit 2022-0001 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Site Development Permit, as conditioned [Exhibit E]: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium/High Density Residential. The City's General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including apartment projects. The City's General Plan policies relating to Medium/High Density Residential encourage a broad range of residential uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU-2 as the project consists of high -quality design that complements and enhances the City. The project design uses high - quality contemporary style, and utilizes varying roof lines and wall depths, along with a complementary color palette. 340 City Council Resolution 2023-XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002; Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2); Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 4 of 7 • Goal LU-5 as the project provides a broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. The project provides for apartments, which creates a different housing type and choice for residents within the City. This includes 74 moderate -income level units. • Policy LU-5.2 in considering changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. The project is changing from a senior residential project to a multi -family apartment project to respond to market demand in residential product type to provide residents with apartments. • Goal SC-1 in that it provides a community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents by providing alternative housing types within La Quinta meanwhile providing a project that incorporates open space and common area with a pool for its residents, along with barbecue areas, pickleball courts, a dog park, and putting green. • Policy ED-1.2 in supporting and assisting in the retention of existing businesses, and the recruitment of new businesses. The apartment project provides additional residences nearby to Highway 111, along Washington Street, and close to the City's Village Commercial area which will allow for a working base close by to support and assist in the retention of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses. • Goal H-1 in providing housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. The apartment project of this type provides a diverse type of residential product. • Policy H-1.3 to direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. The housing development was directed to a viable area where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are all available. • Goal H-2 in assisting in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate -income households and Policy H-2.1 which is to increase housing choices for lower and moderate - income households. This project increases the housing choices for moderate -income households. The project would include 74 moderate - income level units, providing more housing choices for moderate - income households. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Medium High Density Residential zone as well as the development standards of the City's Zoning Code and in terms of architectural style and 341 City Council Resolution 2023-XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002; Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2); Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 5 of 7 landscaping. The project satisfies the zone's intent to provide for the development of medium high density neighborhoods with two and three-story multi -family dwellings. The project is generally consistent with the residential development standards and permitted use table, except deviations as established within the Specific Plan. 3. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Department has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4. The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. The contemporary style utilizes a high -quality design that is compatible with other approved and constructed residential projects within the City. 5. The site design of the project including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. 6. Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture and provide adequate relief and screening from Washington Street and Avenue 50. WHEREAS, the La Paloma Specific Plan (SP 2004-071) was adopted on December 7, 2004, and amended on July 19, 2011, and is the effective Specific Plan for the site. The proposed La Quinta Village Apartments Specific Plan (SP2022-0001), upon the date it becomes effective, shall repeal and replace SP 2004-071 and its amendment; and 342 City Council Resolution 2023-XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002; Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2); Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 6 of 7 WHEREAS, prior to Specific Plan 2022-0001 becoming effective, prior to Site Development Permit 2022-0001 being eligible for approval, and prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the City's update to the Housing Element shall be approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 180 days of approval by City Council of GPA2022-0001. This approval by HCD must include certification of the City's Housing Element after adding "Site 6", as noted in Exhibit A, to the inventory of sites within the City to accommodate the City's share of very low- and low-income units per the City's RHNA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the above project is determined to be consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project (EA 2022-0001). SECTION 3. That it does hereby approve General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2), and Site Development Permit 2022-0001, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval [Exhibits B, D, E]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on August 1, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 343 City Council Resolution 2023-XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002; Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2); Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: August 1, 2023 Page 7 of 7 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 344 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX, EXHIBIT A ADOPTED: AUGUST 1, 2023 HOUSING PURPOSE The Housing Element of the La Quinta General Plan establishes the City's policy relative to the maintenance and development of housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents. Jurisdictions within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region must complete the statutory housing element update for a planning period that extends from 2022 to 2029. The 2022 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) proposes that La Quinta provide the regulatory framework to facilitate the development of new housing units potentially affordable to a range of income levels. The City's RHNA is 1,530 units for the 2022-2029 planning period. The RHNA includes housing planning goals for very low, low, moderate, and above moderate income households. The City's RHNA by affordability level is 420 units of housing affordable to very low income households, 269 affordable for low income households, 297 affordable for moderate income households, and 544 above moderate income units. The Housing Element demonstrates the land resources, financial resources, market trends, and governmental efforts that have the potential to facilitate and encourage housing development and rehabilitation to meet the RHNA. Setting The City of La Quinta is one of nine cities in the Coachella Valley. A world- renowned vacation destination, La Quinta's population varies by season. La Quinta's permanent population is estimated at 4o,66o persons in 202o. The seasonal population exceeds io,000, increasing the City's population by 25% during winter months. La Quinta households are generally wealthier than other areas of Riverside County. The median household income of La Quinta in 2018 was $79,889, signifiC3ntly higher than the Riverside County median household income of $63,948• 345 This income trend is related to the types of new housing available in La Quinta. La Quinta is home to many master planned communities. Although the number of multifamily units in the City increased by more than 30% from 2012 to 2019, multifamily units continue to represent less than 7 percent of the total housing stock. Housing Resources California housing element law allows local governments to obtain credit toward their RHNA housing goals in three ways: constructed and approved units, vacant and underutilized land, and the preservation of existing affordable housing. Moderate income households are able to afford some new and fairly new rental and for sale units. Very Low and Low income households, however, will continue to require subsidized affordable housing. Housing Plan The housing element sets forth a comprehensive housing plan consisting of goals, policies, and programs to address existing and projected housing needs. The detailed programs provided are designed to identify sites to exceed the RHNA, assist the development of affordable housing, remove governmental constraints to housing, preserve the existing housing stock, provide equal housing opportunities, and promote energy and water conservation in residential uses. Quantified Objectives The goals, policies, and programs will guide housing -related decision making and facilitate attainment of the 2022-2029 RHNA housing targets. As shown in Table II-i, future units both planned and to be planned, make up the bulk of new construction counted toward the RHNA. Each jurisdiction must establish quantified objectives by income category to prepare to meet or exceed the RHNA for the 2022-2029 planning period. The City of La Quinta's quantified objectives are based on constructed and approved units and land resources for new housing and programs created to address other existing and projected housing needs. Achieving the City of La Quinta's quantified objectives will rely on third party financing. The City will continue to participate in the development of affordable housing with private party partners. Please see the Housing Resources section. 2 346 Table lk Quantified Objectives 2022-2029 Type of Housing Extremely Low Very Low I Low Moderate Above Moderate Total New Construction New Units 210 210 1 269 297 544 1,530 Rehabilitation/Conservation Residential Rehabilitation 10 15 30 35 90 Conservation 347 INTRODUCTION Purpose The Housing Element of the La Quinta Plan establishes the City's policy relative to the maintenance and development of housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents. These policies will guide City decision making and set forth a housing action program through 2029. These commitments are an expression of the City's desire to facilitate adequate housing for every La Quinta resident. The City's housing policy is consistent with the statewide housing goal of "attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California Family." The purpose of the Element is to establish official policy which: ❖ Identifies existing and projected housing needs, and inventories resources and constraints that are relevant to meeting these needs. The assessment and inventory include: Community Profile Housing Profile Land Resource Inventory Governmental and Nongovernmental Constraints Analysis Analysis of Special Needs Housing Identification of Assisted Units "At Risk" of Conversion ❖ Identifies the community's goals, objectives, and policies relative to the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. ❖ Sets forth a schedule of actions (programs) the City is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element. The Housing Element has been designed to address key housing issues in the City. These issues include appropriate housing types to meet the needs of all segments of the community while maintaining a low density character, provision of affordable housing for special needs groups in the community, and the maintenance of the existing housing stock. Consistency with State Planning Law California Government Code requires that every City and County prepare a Housing Element as part of its General Plan. In addition, State law contains specific requirements for the preparation and content of Housing Elements. Sections 6558o to 65589.8 of the California Government Code contain the legislative mandate for the housing 4 348 element. State law requires that the City's Housing Element consist of "identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement and development of housing." State law also requires that the City evaluate its housing element approximately every eight years to determine its effectiveness in achieving City and statewide housing goals and objectives, and to adopt an updated Element that reflects the results of this evaluation. State law is very specific about the content of the Housing Element and makes it clear that the provision of affordable housing is the responsibility of all local governments. The City is expected to contribute toward regional housing needs and to contribute to the attainment of state housing goals. The most recent updates to Housing Element law occurred in 2017, when a series of bills were passed into law to address the State's determination that California was experiencing a State-wide housing crisis. The laws passed in 2017 addressed a wide range of housing -related issues, including Housing Elements, which are summarized below. • SB z established a recordation fee for real estate documentation which would fund planning grants for affordable housing and affordable housing projects. • SB 3 placed a $4 billion general obligation bond on the November 2o18 ballot to fund affordable housing, farmworker housing, transit - oriented development, infill infrastructure and home ownership. • SB 35 mandated a streamlined approval process for infill affordable housing projects in communities that have not, according to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) met their affordable housing allocation (RHNA). • AB 72 allowed HCD to find a housing element out of compliance with State law, and to refer the non -compliant element to the State Attorney General for action at any time during a Housing Element planning period. • AB 73 provided State -funded financial incentives for local jurisdictions which choose to create a streamlined zoning overlay for certain affordable housing projects. • SB 166 required that development proposals on local jurisdictions' sites inventory cannot be reduced in density without findings, and/or the identification of additional sites to result in `no net loss' of affordable housing units in the sites inventory. 34� • SB 540 provided State funding for the planning and implementation of workforce housing opportunity zones for very low, low and moderate income households. • AB 571 modified the farmworker tax credit program to allow HCD to advance funds to migrant housing center operators at the beginning of each planting season, and allowed migrant housing to remain open for up to 275 days annually. • AB 678 amended the Housing Accountability Act to limit a local jurisdiction's ability to deny low and moderate income housing projects by increasing the required documentation and raising the standard of proof required of a local jurisdiction. • AB 686 (approved in 2o18) required a public agency to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. • AB 879 amended the annual reporting requirements of local jurisdictions to HCD regarding proposed projects, including processing times, number of project applications and approvals, and required approval processes. • AB 1397 amended the requirements of adequate sites analysis to assure that sites are not only suitable, but also available, by requiring additional information in site inventories. • AB 1505 allowed local jurisdictions to adopt local ordinances that require affordable housing units on- or off -site when approving residential projects. • AB 1515 established a `reasonable person' standard to consistency of affordable housing projects and emergency shelters with local policies and standards. • AB 1521 placed restrictions on the owners of affordable housing projects when terminating or selling their projects. General Plan Consistency The goals, policies, standards, and proposals within this element relate directly to and are consistent with all other General Plan elements. The Housing Element identifies programs and resources required for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing to meet the existing and projected needs of its population. The Housing Element is affected by development policies contained in the Land Use Element, which establishes the locations, types, intensity, and distribution of land uses throughout the City and defines the buildout land use scenario. In designating total acreage and density of residential development, the Land Use Element places an upper limit on the number and types of housing units constructed in the City. The acreage designated for a range of commercial and office uses creates 6 350 employment opportunities for various income groups. The presence and potential for jobs affects the current and future demand for housing at the various income levels in the City. In addition, the Land Use Element has been updated in accordance with Senate Bill 244. There are no disadvantaged unincorporated communities in the City's Sphere of Influence. The Circulation Element also affects implementation of the Housing Element. The Circulation Element establishes policies for providing essential streets and roadways to all housing that is developed. The policies contained in the other elements of the General Plan affect the quality of life of the citizens of the City through the control of the amount and variety of open space and recreation areas, acceptable noise levels in residential areas, and programs to provide for the safety of residents. The Housing Element utilizes the most current data available. Data sources include the U.S. Census, American Community Survey, California Department of Finance (DOF), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Riverside County, and various City documents and resources, among others. Scope and Content The Housing Element is organized in the following manner: ❖ Introduction: A statement of the purpose of the Housing Element and statutory requirements, a statement of the relationship between the Housing Element and other General Plan elements, the scope, content and organization of the Element, and a summary of the public participation process. ❖ Evaluation of Past Element: A summary of the achievements and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the past Housing Element. ❖ Housing Vision Statement: A statement describing the future vision of housing in La Quinta as developed by the citizens and elected officials of the City. The policies in the Housing Element are designed to bring this vision to fruition. ❖ Community Profile and Housing Profile: A discussion of the characteristics of the population, households, and housing stock in La Quinta, including growth and affordability trends. 351 ❖ Fair Housing: A discussion of the City's commitment to and implementation of federal and state fair housing laws, as well as identified issues, concerns, and strategies. ❖ Housing Needs: An analysis of groups in the City that may have special housing needs, the implications of the affordability of housing stock in relation to household income, and projected housing needs. ❖ Housing Constraints: A discussion of governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the development of housing and opportunities for energy conservation in residential planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation. ❖ Housing Resources: An inventory of constructed and approved units, land available for residential development, and underutilized sites available for residential redevelopment, and an analysis of the ability of these projects and sites to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). ❖ Preservation of At Risk Units: A description of any assisted, affordable multifamily units that are eligible to convert to market rate within 10 years of the planning period. ❖ Goals, Policies, and Programs: A description of housing goals, policies, and programs responsive to the City's current and projected housing needs. Also included is a summary of the City's quantified objectives for new residential construction, rehabilitation, and financial assistance during the planning period. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE 2014-2021 HOUSING ELEMENT To develop appropriate programs to address the housing issues identified in this Housing Element Update, the City of La Quinta has reviewed the effectiveness of the housing programs adopted in the 2014-2021 Housing Element. The State of California requires an assessment of the previous housing program to identify areas of accomplishment as well as areas in which improvement could occur following the implementation of new or modified programs. The following section reviews the progress in implementation of the programs, the effectiveness of the Element, and the continued appropriateness of the identified programs. Analysis of the past element is quantified where such information is available. 8 352 As described in the evaluation of Policies and Programs below, the City continued to assist households with special needs, including seniors, disabled residents and persons experiencing homelessness (see evaluation of Policies 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5; and Programs 4.4•b, 5.5•a, and 5.5•b below). These programs resulted in benefits to these special needs populations, including the furtherance of programs by housing homeless residents at the Coral Mountain apartments; through CVAG's regional housing efforts for Coachella Valley homeless persons; and by the major rehabilitation and new units provided for seniors and disabled seniors at the Washington Street apartments. The policies and programs were very effective in assisting special needs populations. The results of the analysis provided the basis for developing the comprehensive housing strategy for the 2022-2029 planning period. Adequate Sites for Housing GOAL H-i Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. •'• Policy H-1.1 Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. Program 1.1.a: To address the City's RHNA allocation for extremely low income households, 26 of the 68 new units at the Washington Street Apartments will be designated for extremely low income households. The additional 19 units identified in the RH NA will be given priority either at Washington Street Apartments, or at projects on sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II- 50) ■ Objective: Encourage the provision of 45 extremely low income units in new projects during the planning period. ■ Timing: 2015 for 26 units, 2015-2021 as projects are constructed for 19 units ■ Funding Source: Private Funding, Tax Credit Financing, Other sources as identified ■ Responsible Agency: Planning Department ■ Evaluation: 353 ■ Renovation and expansion of Washington Street Apartments was completed in November 2019, resulting in the rehabilitation of existing 72 units and construction of 68 new units, for a total of 140 units. Twenty-four (24) of the 68 new units were designated for extremely low income households. The additional 19 units identified in the RHNA were not constructed. The program will be modified to address the 2022-2029 RHNA allocation. ❖ Policy H-1.2 Focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing. Evaluation: No annexations were needed for the construction of affordable housing during the 2014-2021 planning period. The Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) continues to offer increased opportunities for affordable fordable housing development by allowing it at higher densities within all commercial zones and several residential sites. This policy was successful and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-1.3 Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. ■ Evaluation: ■ The City continued to look at projects for affordable housing on infill sites and in areas where transit and employment were readily available. Coral Mountain Apartments and Washington Street Apartments were both planned on such sites and their construction has been completed. ■ In 2016, the City introduced the mixed use (MU) overlay in the zoning code (La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.140) to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components in a cohesively designed and constructed manner. Mixed use projects will locate residents in proximity to services, employment, and transportation hubs and provide interconnected multi -purpose paths for alternative modes of transportation. Mixed use projects can claim incentives, including reduced parking requirements, reduced plan check and inspection fees, and density bonuses. The policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. 10 354 Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing GOAL H-z Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate income households. ❖ Policy H-2.1 Increase housing choices for lower and moderate income households. ❖ Policy H-z.z Support public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing. ❖ Policy H-2.3 Pursue a variety of forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development of affordable housing. Program H-2.3.a: Collaborative Partnerships The City shall meet with parties interested in affordable housing development to discuss types of incentives available and requirements for obtaining assistance, discuss appropriate sites for affordable housing, and foster professional collaboration between the City and affordable housing stakeholders. ■ Objective: Continue to collaborate with nonprofits and the development community to develop affordable housing. ■ Timing: Project -by -project basis, by request, or on an annual basis. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City Manager's office supports affordable housing efforts and coordinates regularly with affordable housing partners such as Lift to Rise. The City will continue to assist affordable housing developers in securing third party financing. During the 2014-2021 planning period, Coral Mountain Apartments was completed with Desert Cities Development. This program was successful and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-2.3.b: Affordable Housing Renter -to -Owner Transition Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set 11 355 aside all or a portion of their units for low income households. LIHTC projects can transition from rental to ownership units. The units must remain rentals for 15 years, at which time some projects convert to ownership units. Typically a portion or all of the rent paid for the 5 years prior to the conversion is put toward the purchase of the unit. This enables lower income households to invest in the property in which they have been living and benefit from its appreciation. Existing stalled condominium and townhome projects are prime opportunities for low income tax credits to be used for renter -to - owner programs. ■ Objective: Investigate the use of LIHTCs to finance affordable single-family attached rental development that can transition, after 15 years, into moderate income ownership housing. ■ Timing: Complete study by end of fiscal 2015 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: Investigation into the use of LIHTCs to finance affordable single-family attached rental development was not completed. However, it is still considered important. This program will continue into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-2.3.c: Affordable Housing Renter -to -Owner Transition There are many resources that the City, nonprofits, or for -profit developers may utilize to subsidize the construction and maintenance of affordable housing. Some of the most prominent resources are described below. ■ Objective: Advertise other financial resources through the affordable housing page of the City's website, apply for grants and competitive loans, and form partnerships with the development community to obtain additional financial resources. ■ Timing: Update website with funding information and partnership opportunities every six months or earlier if appropriate. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department 12 356 Low Income Tax Credits Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low income households. A minimum of zo percent of the units must be affordable to low income households and 40 percent of the units must be affordable to moderate income households. Community Reinvestment Act The Community Reinvestment Act provides favorable financing to affordable housing developers. The Redevelopment Agency, development community, and local, regional, and national banks are encouraged to work together to meet their obligations pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act. California Housing Finance Agency Program The California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) has three single- family programs for primarily moderate and middle income homebuyers: the Home Ownership Assistance Program and the Affordable Housing Partnership Program. Each provides permanent mortgage financing for first-time homebuyers at below -market interest rates. HOME Funds HOME is the largest Federal block grant distributed to state and local governments for the creation of lower income housing. Cities apply when Notices of Funding Availability are issued. Neighborhood Stabilization Program HUD's Neighborhood Stabilization Program makes emergency assistance grants available to local governments for the acquisition, redevelopment, and renting or resale of foreclosed properties at -risk of abandonment. Riverside County First -Time Homebuyers Program Continue participation in the Riverside County First -Time Homebuyers Program for low and moderate income households. Mortgage Credit Certificate The Riverside County Mortgage Credit Certificate Program is designed to assist low and moderate income first time homebuyers. Under the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, first-time homebuyers receive a tax credit based on a percentage of the interest paid on their mortgage. This tax credit allows the buyer to qualify more easily for home loans, as it increases the 3 57 effective income of the buyer. Under federal legislation, 20 percent of the funds must be set aside for buyers with incomes between 75 and 8o percent of the county median income. Finance Agency Lease -Purchase Program Riverside/San Bernardino County Housing Finance Agency Lease Purchase Program provides down payment assistance and closing costs for eligible households up to 140 percent of the area median income. Housing Choice Voucher (formerly Section 8) Referrals Housing Choice Vouchers allow lower income households to use rental subsidies anywhere in the County, including La Quinta. Evaluation: Information about financial resources and partnership opportunities available for subsidizing the construction and maintenance of affordable housing was not provided on the City's website. However, it continues to be a priority, and City staff plans to accomplish this task by 2022. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-2.3.d: Sweat Equity and Shared Equity Sweat equity and shared equity programs provide lower and moderate income households with ownership assistance. Sweat equity refers to the exchange of time and effort, usually in the form of construction activities, for an affordable ownership opportunity. • Objective: Continue to work with organizations that offer sweat and shared equity housing programs to lower and moderate income households in La Quinta. • Timing: Meet with organizations annually or more frequently (if requested or advantageous) to identify opportunities for coordinated efforts or potential housing projects. • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City has worked with both Habitat for Humanity and the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition in the development of sweat equity homes in the past. However, no units were built in collaboration with the City during the 2014-2021 planning period. This program has been successful in the past and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. 14 358 Removal of Governmental Constraints to Housing GOAL H-3 Create a regulatory system that does not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing affordable to all La Quinta residents. ❖ Policy H-3.1 Remove unnecessary regulatory constraints to enable the construction or rehabilitation of housing that meets the needs of La Quinta residents, including lower income and special needs residents. Evaluation: In 2017, the City adopted Ordinance No. 561 to amend Municipal Code Section 9.6o.ogo (previously "Second Residential Units") to establish development standards and criteria for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). Under these amendments, ADUs are permitted as accessory uses in all residential zones and qualifying units can receive allowances for parking requirement exemptions and utility connection exemptions. The amendments reduce regulatory constraints associated with ADU development and expand housing opportunities for lower -income residents. The City will continue to monitor all municipal code requirements to assure that they do not impose a constraint on the development of affordable housing. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-3.2 Coordinate the development of affordable housing with the provision of key utilities to ensure prompt and adequate service. Evaluation: All new project development plans are provided to the utility providers for review and comment on a case -by -case basis. The City coordinates with utility providers to assure that adequate utilities are in place and operational to serve the needs of residents. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-3.3 Incentivize the development of affordable housing to facilitate the development of housing for the City's lower and moderate income households. Evaluation: In 2oi6, the City introduced the mixed use (MU) overlay in the zoning code (La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.140) to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. The City also amended and completed Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) regulations and district boundaries in ordinances passed in 20i6 and 2oig. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-3.3.a: Priority Water and Sewer Service In compliance with state law, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) must create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential project. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings, and requires future water management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development. ■ Objective: Route the adopted Housing Element to the CVWD and notify them of changes and future updates to the Housing Element. ■ Timing: Upon Housing Element adoption ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: CVWD is responsible for compliance with state law. The City will provide the adopted Housing Element to CVWD, notify them of changes and future updates, and continue to coordinate with them in the processing of applications in a timely manner. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-3.3.b: Reduced Parking Standards There are several potential opportunities to reduce parking standards for special types of development in La Quinta. While the City already has special parking standards for multifamily senior housing, there is potential to further reduce those requirements, particularly for lower and moderate income senior housing. The compact, mixed -use character of the Village area may also foster opportunities for parking reductions or joint -use opportunities. Lower and moderate income households may own fewer vehicles than above moderate income households, 16 360 and be more inclined to walk or use public transportation. Incentives such as reduced parking requirements could be offered for affordable housing developments. ■ Objective: Study the potential impacts of adopting reduced parking requirements or shared parking standards for senior housing and housing in the Village, particularly for projects serving lower and moderate income households. ■ Timing: Zoning Ordinance Update 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City updated Incentive Based Parking Adjustments (Zoning Code Section 9.150.050) in 2017 which allows a reduction in parking spaces of up to fifteen percent, subject to approval by the Planning Commission. Section 9.150.050.B addresses opportunities for parking reductions in the Village Build -Out Plan Area, including potential reductions of fifty percent and other variations subject to approval by the director. The program is complete and will not be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-3.3.c: Encourage Lot Consolidation Several small lots in the Village Commercial would have improved development potential through lot consolidation. The City will study, identify, and adopt regulatory incentives to encourage and facilitate lot consolidation. Potential incentives include fee deferral or reductions, parking requirement reduction, and relief from various other development standards that could potentially increase the cost of the project. ■ Objective: Identify opportunities and adopt incentives for lot consolidation in the Village Commercial zone ■ Timing: July 1, 2015 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City completed the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan and EIR in 2017. Ordinance No. 553 amended several chapters of the Municipal Code related to development standards for the Plan area; development standards are provided in Section 9.70.110. Projects in the Plan area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre. Per Section 9.140.o9o.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, 361 expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. Parking requirement reductions and variations in the Village Build -Out Plan area are addressed in Section 9.150.05o.B. Although the regulatory portion of this program is complete, the need for lot consolidation in the Village remains, and the program will be modified to address this. GOAL H-4 Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties. ❖ Policy H-4.1 Protect the quality of La Quinta's neighborhoods through the rehabilitation of both affordable and market -rate homes. Evaluation: The rehabilitation of both affordable and market -rate homes is an ongoing process supported by the City. The rehabilitation Of 72 existing units at Washington Street Apartments, an affordable housing project, was completed in 2oig. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-4.2 Promote financial and technical assistance to lower and moderate income households for housing maintenance and improvements. Evaluation: The City continues to support Riverside County and other third -party programs to fill this need. The City provides information on the HERO financing program for energy efficiency home improvements. City staff will conduct research on technical assistance available by agencies, including County assistance programs, and direct households to these programs when appropriate. This policy will be extended into the 2022- 2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-4.3 Encourage the retention and rehabilitation of existing single-family neighborhoods and mobile home parks that are economically and physically sound. 18 362 ❖ Policy H-4.4 Enhance neighborhoods that presently provide affordable housing with drainage, lighting and landscape amenities, and parks and recreation areas. Program H-4.4.a: Housing Condition Monitoring To better understand the City's housing needs the quality and condition of the housing stock must be inventoried on a regular basis. The inventory should focus on older neighborhoods, such as those south of Calle Tampico, west of Washington Street, and north of Highway ill. ■ Objective: Maintain an inventory of housing conditions (updated approximately every five years) to enable the City to properly target Code Compliance and rehabilitation resources. ■ Timing: Complete by June 30, 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: There was no activity during the 2014-2021 planning period. City staff will conduct a housing condition survey in the 2022-2023 Fiscal Year. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-4.4.b: County of Riverside Senior Residential Rehabilitation The Minor Senior Home Repair program allocates grants up to $250 per year for lower income seniors for minor housing repairs, such as painting doors or trim, or repairing a window. The Enhanced Senior Home Repair Program provides major rehabilitation and repair for low income seniors, providing a one- time grant for repairs to homes owned and occupied by seniors and/or persons with disabilities. The maximum level of assistance for this program is $3,000 per year. ■ Objective: Continue to refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside Minor and Enhanced Senior Home Repair programs and other local resources. Assist homeowners in completing applications as necessary. ■ Timing: Throughout planning period, on a case -by -case basis ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department 361 Evaluation: The City does not operate its own senior home repair program; however, the City Manager's office coordinates with lower income households and refers them to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency, as appropriate. This program is an ongoing effort and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-4.4.c: County of Riverside Home Repair Grant The County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Home Repair Program provides lower income households with up to $6,00o for home repairs such as a new roof, new air -conditioner, or a handicap ramp. As a jurisdiction in Riverside County, lower income La Quinta households are eligible for this grant. ■ Objective: Refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside for home repair grants. ■ Timing: Throughout planning period, on a case -by -case basis ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: To the extent that these County programs have been funded, the City has referred homeowners to the appropriate County staff. This effort is ongoing and the program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-4.4.d: Rehabilitation Resources List Lower and moderate income homeowners may need assistance in affording important home repairs and improvements. The City can assist these households by compiling and sharing a listing of local, state, and federal programs offering rehabilitation assistance. ■ Objective: Provide a rehabilitation resources list on the affordable housing and code compliance pages of the City's website. Use the list, in online or printed form, as a reference for code violators. ■ Timing: Create list by June 30, 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department 20 364 Evaluation: City staff has not prepared a list of rehabilitation resources for home repairs and improvements; however, such an effort is still considered important. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Equal Housing Opportunity GOAL H-5 Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. ❖ POlicy 5.1 Provide the regulatory framework to create an environment in which housing opportunities are equal. Evaluation: The City complies with all housing laws regarding equal housing opportunities, including updates on accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in 2017 and again in 202012021. The City regularly reviews and amends its Municipal Code to assure that all aspects of it comply with the law. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy 5.2 Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the sale or rental of housing. Evaluation: The City complies with all housing laws and distributes fair housing information. The City monitors housing complaints and refers all complaints to the Riverside County Fair Housing Council, which has jurisdiction over such matters. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ POlicy 5.3 Encourage support services for the Coachella Valley's senior and homeless populations through referrals and collaborative efforts with non -profits and other jurisdictions. Evaluation: The City provides funding to and participates in CVAG's homelessness programs and provides financial assistance to Martha's Village and Kitchen and Coachella Valley Rescue Mission for homeless prevention services, in 21 365 addition to providing bus passes for homeless people and collaborating with non -profits to provide rapid rehousing and other services. This policy involves ongoing efforts and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy 5.4 Assist in the creation of a continuum of care for the homeless population and those transitioning into permanent housing. Evaluation: The City provides ongoing support for the CVAG Homeless Committee and participation in CVAG's homelessness programs. In the 2014-2021 planning period, the City housed five homeless families in Coral Mountain apartments through the Homeless Prevention Program. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy 5.5 Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may create barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design. Evaluation: During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City further amended the Zoning Code Section 9.60.320 to refine procedures for requesting, submittal, and review of applications for reasonable accommodation. The City continues to facilitate development of accessible housing for all its residents. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-5.5.a: Regional Facilities for the Homeless Continue to support and collaborate with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Homelessness Committee efforts to maintain a regional homeless facility that provides housing as well as supportive services. Continue to contribute, if funds allow, $25o,000 annually to CVAG's efforts to provide housing and support services across the Coachella Valley. ■ Timing: City staff will continue to collaborate with CVAG throughout the planning. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department ZZ 366 Evaluation: The City participated in and collaborated with CVAG's Homelessness Committee to provide supportive programs for homeless people in the Coachella Valley. After the closure of Roy's Desert Resource Center in 2017, CVAG contracted with a non-profit to operate its Coachella Valley Housing First program and initiated the CVHEART program to coordinate and expand regional homelessness efforts. The City worked with homeless shelters and re -housing programs directly and through CVAG. Continuing support of these programs will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-5.5.b: Transitional Housing and Permanent Supportive Housing Transitional housing typically accommodates homeless people for up to two years as they stabilize their lives and does not meet emergency needs. Transitional housing includes training and services that are vital for rehabilitating and enriching the lives of the formerly homeless. Transitional housing facilities provide families and individuals with a safe place within which to rebuild their lives and prepare for independence. Permanent supportive housing is affordable housing with on- or off -site services that help a person maintain a stable, housed, life. ■ Objective: The Zoning Ordinance shall allow transitional and supportive housing as a residential use in all zones which allow for residential development, and subject only to those restrictions that apply to similar residential uses (single or multi -family units) of the same type in the same zone, and will not be subject to any restrictions not imposed on similar dwellings, including occupancy limits. ■ Timing: Coordinate with 2009/2011 General Plan Update ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Planning Department Evaluation: Several zoning ordinance amendments were completed in the 2014-2021 planning period. The amendments define homeless shelters and transitional shelters; allow transitional and supportive housing with a conditional use permit in the Medium Density, Medium -High Density, and High Density Residential zones; and allow transitional shelters with a conditional use permit within Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zones. Emergency shelters are allowed in all commercial zones. This program was completed and will not be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. �I Program H-5.5.c: Fair Housing Referrals Fair housing organizations provide dispute resolution and legal assistance to tenants and landlords in conflict. Such services are particularly important for lower and moderate income households unable to afford counsel. ■ Objective: Continue to refer tenants and landlords to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. Provide information on fair housing resources on the City's website and at City Hall. Identify and coordinate with local nonprofits, service organizations and community groups that can assist in distributing fair housing information. ■ Timing: Referral service as needed. Information to be placed on website and local groups identified by January 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: City staff referred residents to the County Fair Housing Council as needed. The City website provides information on the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (FHCRC) and how to contact the FHCRC. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-5.5.d: Directory of Services While numerous services are available to special needs and lower income households, it can be difficult to readily have access to these resources. A directory provides the contact information necessary to seek housing assistance. ■ Objective: Develop an online directory of services and information to provide La Quinta residents with contact information for community organizations and service providers that address special needs. ■ Timing: Update website by March 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City website includes directories of affordable rental and ownership housing developments, as well as information about senior home purchase loan programs, personal finance resources, and other housing resources. City housing staff will continue to add additional information as needed. This program involves ongoing efforts and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. 24 368 Energy and Water Conservation GOAL H-6.i Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. ❖ Policy H-6.1 Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. Evaluation: The zoning ordinance was amended in 2017 to include standards for mixed use and planned unit development (PUD). The purpose of the PUD is to allow flexibility in the design of residential projects, and encourage the development of creative, high -quality residential projects that provide attractive living environments in a setting that is different from standard single family home development. The City also continues to promote energy efficiency through rebate programs provided by utility companies and other agencies. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-6.2 Facilitate housing development and rehabilitation that conserves natural resources and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions. Evaluation: New and renovated units at Washington Street Apartments were completed in 2oig and built to meet or exceed the most recent energy efficient building standards. Energy -conserving materials and systems include faucet flow restrictors, Energy Star -rated appliances and roofs, dual -glazed windows, and vented kitchen range hoods. The City website provides information about numerous home energy efficiency products, programs, and services, including financial assistance and residential rebate programs, that help homeowners conserve natural resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-6.3 Encourage and enforce green building regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing. A2 Evaluation: The City adopts and enforces the California Building Code (CBC) and California Green Building Standards Code per State requirements. The 2019 CBC updates include solar and green building requirements. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-6.4 Focus sustainability efforts on measures and techniques that also assist the occupant in reducing energy costs; therefore reducing housing costs. Evaluation: The City has supported several residential developments that incorporate sustainable efforts and help reduce the occupant's energy costs. These properties include Coral Mountain Apartments and Washington Street Apartments for disabled seniors and veterans; both were completed during the 2014-2021 planning period. The City continues to promote its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and implement sustainability principles and measures in the General Plan. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-6.5 Use and encourage emerging technologies to reduce high demands for electricity and natural gas including use of passive solar devices and where feasible other renewable energy technologies (e.g., biomass, wind, and geothermal). Program H-6.5.a: Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program Continue to implement the Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program. ■ Objective: Implement green goals, policies, and programs that accurately represent the City's direction in resource conservation and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. Implement design standards for residential and commercial structures that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation. ■ Timing: As projects are proposed ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program includes providing information on the City's website about home improvement programs, financial resources and rebates, recycling programs, water and energy 26 370 conservation measures, and other resources that facilitate resource conservation and greenhouse gas emission reductions. The City adopted and enforces the 2019 California Building Code and California Green Building Code that require design standards that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation. The City also implements the policies and programs of its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and General Plan. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-6.5.b: Energy Conservation Partners In working toward a sustainable La Quinta, the City and its residents will need to collaborate with utilities and service providers. Partnerships with the Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, Southern California Association of Governments and other entities will be an important component of making La Quinta a more livable city. ■ Objective: Continue to meet with and seek insight from utilities, service providers, and other entities involved in energy conservation efforts appropriate for La Quinta. ■ Timing: As part of regular coordination meetings with utilities ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Community Development Department Evaluation: The City coordinates with utility companies to promote and implement energy conservation programs in residential construction. The City website includes descriptions of and contact information for home improvement energy conservation measures and financing programs, including rebates, offered by SoCalGas, Imperial Irrigation District, CVWD, and Burrtec Waste and Recycling. Development plans and construction activities are closely coordinated with utilities during planning and operational purposes. This program is ongoing and will be extended through the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-6.5.c: Imperial Irrigation District Programs The Imperial Irrigation District (IID) is proactive in energy savings via conservation programs, product rebates, and general tips. An average home owner can save up to to percent on energy/energy bills by taking advantage of IID programs. Home owners can utilize the free "Check Me!" program, which checks the 3 71 refrigerant charge and airflow of their air conditioning/heating units. I I D also offers a rebate on the purchase of higher efficiency air conditioning units, high efficiency refrigerators, programmable thermostats, and ENERGY STAR equipment. City staff has held several meetings with III) representatives to discuss opportunities for collaboration to conserve energy in La Quinta, including water management opportunities for golf courses and golf -oriented communities. ■ Objective: Maintain contact with III) to market energy efficiency programs and rebates that are most beneficial to La Quinta residents and homeowners. ■ Timing: Quarterly through Desert Cities Energy Partnership meetings ■ Funding Source: General Fund, IID program funds, and potential AB 811 special assessment district funds ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Community Development Department Evaluation: The City's Going Green website provides information on IID programs and rebates through links to their websites, including the Residential ENERGY STAR product rebate program. IID continues to offer free, in -home residential and commercial energy audits and follow-up lists of recommendations intended to reduce electricity consumption and costs. The City promotes these programs through meetings with Homeowners' Association boards and various City sponsored events to encourage La Quinta residents and businesses to sign up for energy audits and reduction programs. However, IID's future is currently unknown; in addition to continuing to recommend IID as a conservation resource, the City will need to explore additional opportunities for residents to acquire energy savings via conservation programs, products, rebates, and general tips. This program will be modified for the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H-6.5.d: Weatherization Assistance The Federal Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program, in conjunction with state and local programs, provide low or no cost weatherization and insulation services to reduce the heating and cooling costs for low income households. ■ Objective: Encourage low income homeowners or renters to apply for free energy audits, home weatherization, and utility rebate programs by advertising available programs on the City's website and at City Hall. 28 372 ■ Timing: Advertise annually as program funds are available ■ Funding: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Building and Safety Department, City Manager's Office Evaluation: The City website and distribution materials/flyers describe and provide contact information for Imperial Irrigation District's free energy audits for homes, home energy efficiency surveys, financing programs and tax credits, and rebates and incentive programs. The City also promotes SoCalGas' free energy and water conservation kit for residential customers and no -cost, energy -saving home improvements for income -qualified homeowners and renters. This program is successful and will be extended into the zozz-zozg planning period. However, the focus will continue to be on local and regional, not federal, programs, which will be reflected in revisions to the program. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION California Government Code requires that local governments make a diligent effort to achieve public participation from all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. The City's public outreach efforts focused on community and stakeholder workshops, information disseminated through the City's website, electronic mail notifications, and public hearings. Together, this input helped the City understand and respond to the housing needs of the community. The Housing Element draft was also posted on the City's website. Community and Stakeholder Workshops Workshop invitations were sent to local and regional development entities, advocacy groups, and interested parties via email. In addition, workshops were advertised on the City's website and in email blasts to the City's extensive resident email list. The workshops consisted of a Planning Commission presentation, two City Council updates, a Housing Commission presentation and a public workshop attended by more than 15 community members. The comments received at these workshops included the following, which are addressed in this Housing Element: ❖ Concerns about how to address overpayment by both owners and renters. ❖ The difficulty of financing new projects, which now require two or three times as many funding sources as in the past. 2 7S ❖ Concerns regarding whether short term vacation rentals are impacting the availability of housing for permanent residents. ❖ Assuring that land inventory sites for all types of housing. ❖ Assuring that development standards, fees and processing times reflect the needs of affordable housing projects. ❖ January 12, 2021 to present the process of the Update, discuss the City's RHNA allocation and seek input from the Commission. The Commission had no questions or comments. ❖ Joint Planning Commission and City Council Study Session on August 3, 2021, to inform the members on the comments received by HCD, and discuss the distribution of sites. The members had several questions and comments on the need for housing, including creative housing solutions like tiny homes; the City's ongoing efforts to provide it, and the challenges associated with funding projects. The comments and questions led to amendments and additions to policies and programs which are included in this Element. The amendments included changes to programs to develop incentives, including fee reductions and development standard concessions for affordable housing projects, and working closely with the development community to secure funding from all available sources. The participants' concerns were considered in the preparation of the goals, policies and programs, including additions and changes that further commit the City to partnering with affordable housing developers in the development of projects in the future; the City's recent actions to limit short term vacation rentals; and including inventory sites of varying sizes and locations close to services, transit, schools and job centers. The Element was posted on the City's website, and a public comment period provided from September to to 24, 2021. The public comment period was advertised through Facebook and Instagram posts, and a Nextdoor announcement from the City, and an email blast to all those invited to the community workshops (see Appendix A). City received no comments during the comment period. State Review and Public Hearings The Draft Element was submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review and certification. The City has received and responded to review comments from HCD to address its concerns. 30 374 The Housing Element was posted on the City's website for 3o days prior to City Council hearing. The posting was advertised on the City's website, on its Facebook page, and individual emails sent to all of the housing advocates, developers and residents who participated in the City's workshops (see Appendix A). HOUSING VISION STATEMENT A Housing Vision Statement was developed based on key housing issues and through cooperation of the citizens and elected officials of the City of La Quinta when the General Plan was adopted. It has been reviewed periodically, but remains true to the City's goals and aspirations. The housing policies and programs included in this Housing Element are designed to bring this vision to fruition. "The City of La Quinta's vision of the future for housing focuses on encouraging the provision of suitable housing for all City residents while maintaining and enhancing the City's high quality of life for its residents. Through its housing programs, the City will facilitate the maintenance and improvement of its existing housing stock resources, and encourage the production of a variety of new housing to meet residents' needs, while preserving the overall character of the City." COMMUNITY PROFILE The housing needs of the City are determined by characteristics of the population (age, household size, employment, and ethnicity) and the characteristics of housing available to that population (i.e., number of units, tenure, size, cost, etc.). This section explores the characteristics of the existing and projected population and housing stock in order to identify potentially unmet housing needs in La Quinta. This information provides direction in updating the City's Housing Element goals, policies, and programs. The demographics used in this section are derived from US Census data for z000 and 2010; US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 3 and 5 year estimates data, California Department of Finance, and the City of La Quinta. Population The City of La Quinta is one of nine cities in the Coachella Valley subregion of Riverside County. The Coachella Valley includes the cities of Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La 3�5 Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage, as well as large areas of unincorporated Riverside County. La Quinta ranks high in population growth among California's 482 cities. During the 199os, the population of La Quinta grew by 111.3 percent, making it the fastest growing city in the Coachella Valley at the time. The number of residents in the City increased from 11,215 to 37,467 between 1990 and 201o. The population further increased to 40,704 by 2o18, a smaller increase of 8.6 percent compared to the previous two decades. The absolute increase in population for cities in the Coachella Valley provides another perspective for analysis when size is taken into consideration. For example, Indio grew by the greatest number of people from 2010 to 2o18, with an increase of approximately 15,199 people. La Quinta experienced the fourth largest numerical increase, with an added population of 3,237• Table II-2 Population Growth City/Region 2000 2010 Census 2o18 ACS 2000-2010 2010-2o18 La Quinta 23,694 37,467 58.1 13,773 40,704 8.6 3,237 Coachella Valley 255,788 346,518 35.5 90,730 382,296 10.3 35,778 Riverside County 1,545,387 2,i89,641 41.7 644,254 2,383,286 8.8 193,645 Source: 20oo and 2010 Census; American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates Table II-3 Population Growth In Coachella Vallev Cities City 2000 2010 Census 2018 ACS Change 2000-2010 Change 2010-2o18 Cathedral City 42,647 51,200 20.1 8,553 54,037 5.5 2,837 Coachella 22,724 40,704 79.1 17,980 44,849 10.2 4,145 Desert Hot Springs 16,582 25,938 56.4 9,356 28,430 9.6 2,492 Indian Wells 3,816 4,958 29.9 1,142 5,317 7.2 359 Indio 49,116 76,036 54.8 26,920 91,235 20.0 15,199 La Quinta 23,694 37,467 58.1 13,773 40,704 8.6 3,237 Palm Desert 41,155 48,445 17.7 7,290 52,124 7.6 3,679 Palm Springs 42,807 44,552 4.1 1,745 47,525 6.7 2,973 Rancho Mirage 13,249 17,218 30.0 3,969 1$,075 5.0 857 Total 1 255,790 1 346,5i8 1 35.5 1 90,728 1 382,296 1 10.3 35,778 Source: 2000 and 2010 Census; American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates 32 376 Seasonal Population The seasonal or part time resident population is not included in the population estimates compiled by the Census Bureau because people are classified according to the location of their primary residence. The California Department of Finance (DOF) provides a yearly estimate of total built housing units and an estimate of the number of vacant units. In resort communities like La Quinta, the number of vacant units reflects the number of units that are not occupied year-round, as well as those that are ready for year-round occupancy but have not been inhabited. According to the 2010 Census, the overall vacancy rate for La Quinta is 36.9%, while the seasonal vacancy rate is 27.5%. According to the 2018 ACS Census, the overall vacancy rate for La Quinta is 38.3%, while the seasonal vacancy rate is 31.8%. Age Composition Table II-4, Age Distribution, shows the change in age groups from 2010 to 2018. In 2018, children and youth groups (ages o-19) comprised 23.8 percent of the population, young and middle -age adults (20 to 54 years) represented 36.5 percent and all age groups over 55 years made up 39.8 percent. The data show that the population is slowly aging. In 2018, the median age in La Quinta was 47.E years, significantly older than Riverside County and the State of California averages of 35.8 and 36.7 years, respectively. This represents a 3% increase in the City's median age since 2010, when the median age was 45.6 years. Table II-4 indicates that the rate of growth in the o-19 age groups slightly declined from 2010 to 2018. The 20-54 age groups reflect a slower growth rate, making up 2.8% less of the City's population in 2018. Conversely, growth in the 55+ age category shows a 3.5% increase in the share of City population compared to 2010. Table II-4 Aare Distribution Age Group 2010 201$ # % # Under 5 years 1,784 4.8 2,048 5.0 5 to 9 years 2,136 5.7 2,549 6.3 10 to 14 years 2,624 7.0 2,212 5.4 15 to 19 years 2,544 6.8 2,877 7.1 20 to 24 years 1,629 4.3 1,635 4.0 25 to 34 years 3,239 8.6 3,567 8.8 35 to 44 years 4,457 11.9 4,231 10.4 45 to 54 years 5,435 14.5 5,413 13.3 55 to 59 years 2,652 7.1 2,849 7.0 6o to 64 years 3,151 8.4 3,318 8.2 Fi11 Table II-4 Age Distribution Age Group 2010 2018 # % # 65 to 74 years 4,989 13.3 5,929 14.6 75 to 84 years 2,217 5.9 3,127 7.7 85 years & over 610 1.6 949 2.3 Total 37,467 1 100 40,704 100 Median age 45.6 47.1 Source: 2010 U.S. Census Tables P12 and P13; American Community Survey 2014-2018 s-Year Estimates, Tables DPoS and Bo1002 Race and Ethnicity Table II-5 describes the racial and ethnic distribution of the population for 2010 and 2018. Residents who categorize themselves as white comprise the largest race/ethnicity. The distribution remains largely stable from 2010 to 2018 with a small increase in the Asian group and a decrease in the American Indian and Alaska Native group. The percentage of Hispanic or Latino residents increased slightly from 30.3% to 34.1%. Table II-5 Population by Race/Ethnicity Race/Ethnicity 2010 2018 One Race White 29,489 78.7 32,239 79.2 Black or African American 713 1.9 772 1.9 American Indian and Alaska Native 230 0.6 48 0.1 Asian 1,176 3.1 1,529 3.8 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific 41 0.1 20 <0.1 Islander Some Other Race 4,595 12.3 4,757 11.7 Two or More Races 1,223 3.3 1,339 3.3 Total 37,467 100 40,704 100 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 11,339 30.3 13,872 34.1 Source: 2010 U.S. Census, Tables P3 and P12H; American Community Survey 2014- 2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DPoS Employment The economy of the Coachella Valley was traditionally agriculture - driven, but has gradually shifted to tourism, service industries, and residential uses. Although employment patterns typically induce housing demand, the regional economy of the Coachella Valley differs from most parts of the state. Here, employment is created by housing demand, manifested in the construction and staffing of resorts and second homes. Tourism and 34 378 resort development are leading indicators that predict employment and housing demand. Although the tourist economy is seasonal in the Coachella Valley, it is generally stable and does not typically suffer the severe effects of recessions as do other regions dependent on manufacturing and consumer related goods. And with the benefit of desert weather, the resorts in the La Quinta area are increasingly operating year-round. There is, however, some seasonal fluctuation in the labor market, which can further compound the problem of economic stability in the lower income sectors of the labor force, affecting their ability to sustain themselves in the off season (summer) months. According to the US Census Bureau (2014-2ol8 American Community Survey), in 2o18 the civilian labor force over 16 years comprised 17,18o persons. Table II-6 shows the types of employment by industry held by La Quinta residents in 2o18. The majority of jobs held by La Quinta residents were in "educational services, health care, and social assistance", followed by "arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food service" industries, "retail trade," and "professional, scientific, management, administrative, and waste management" industries. As shown in Table II-7, more than one-third (37.1%) of the City's civilian employed labor force is employed in "management, business, science, and arts" occupations, followed by "sales and office" occupations (26.5%) and "service" occupations (2o.8%). Table II-8 shows the major employers in the City of La Quinta. The largest employers are in the nonmanufacturing economy and are directly related to the provision of services, including education, big box retail, and recreational and resort activities. In 2019 the City surveyed its major commercial and hospitality facilities to identify major employers in the city limits. The largest employers surveyed include Desert Sands Unified School District, La Quinta Resort & Club/PGA West, Wal-Mart, Costco, and Home Depot. The Great Recession, with onset in late 2007, saw high unemployment and job losses in the Coachella Valley. At the lowest point, about every seventh person lost their job.' Regional employment started to increase in 2011, but annual growth was still slowerthan pre -Recession levels until 2017, suffering more impact than western Riverside County, the state, and nation. The construction sector was hit hardest regionally, with approximately 70% of jobs lost and only 14% recovered by December 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Figure 24. Cry 2017.2 The Retail Trade and Wholesale Trade sector lost around 6,700 jobs but has basically returned to pre -Recession levels. Two sectors have fully recovered and even added jobs: Education and Health Services and, to a lesser extent, Leisure and Hospitality. Between 2012 and 2019, annual unemployment rates in La Quinta saw an overall decline from a high of 7.5% in 2012 to a low of 4.1% in 2019.3 However, analysis of employment data from 2005 to 2017 shows that, as of December 2017, La Quinta had not fully recovered the job losses it incurred during the Great Recession. The City lost about 30% of jobs, relative to peak employment, and had recovered only about 5%.4 This scenario is roughly the same for seven other Coachella Valley cities; only Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage had recovered and exceeded their previous peaks. Future employment opportunities for City residents will include a variety of new retail, service, and entertainment jobs at the luxury Montage and Pendry hotels that are under construction at the SilverRock Golf Resort, a Residence Inn recently constructed on Highway 111, as well as other development resulting from the City's 2019 Highway 111 Corridor Plan. CV Link, a 49-mile long regional, multimodal pathway under construction, will run north of the Highway 111 corridor and is anticipated to support new business and employment opportunities. Z ]bid, Figures 25 and 26. 3 California Employment Development Department annual unemployment rates (labor force), not seasonally adjusted, not preliminary. 4 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Figure 28. 36 380 Table II-6 Employment by Industry (2o18) Industry Employed Persons % of Employed Persons Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, mining 352 2.0 Construction 1,056 6.1 Manufacturing 691 4.0 Wholesale Trade 242 1.4 Retail Trade 2,479 14.4 Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 657 3.8 Information 199 1.2 Finance, insurance, real estate, rental, leasing 1,309 7.6 Professional, scientific, management, admin., waste management 1,977 11•5 Educational services, health care, social assistance 3,373 19.6 Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, food services 2,947 �7.2 Other services, except public administration 1,021 5.9 Public Administration 877 5.1 Total civilian employed 16 years and over 1 17,180 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates, Table S2403 Table II-7 Employment by Occupation (2o18) Occupation # % Management, business, science, and arts occupations 6,368 37.E Service occupations 3,577 20.8 Sales and office occupations 4,547 26.5 Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations 1,588 9.2 Production, transportation, and material moving occupations 1,100 6.4 Total civilian employed population 16 years and over 1708o 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates, Table S2401 Al Table II-8 Principal Emplovers in Citv of La Quinta Name of Employer Employed Persons Description Desert Sands Unified School District 2,852 Government La Quinta Resort & Club/ PGA West' 1,412 Hotel & Golf Resort Wal-Mart Super Center 300 Retailer Costco 290 Retailer Home Depot 212 Retailer Target 18o Retailer Lowe's Home Improvement 150 Retailer Imperial Irrigation District 134 Utility Company In N Out 84 Fast Food Restaurant Vons 83 Grocery Store Rancho La Quinta 77 Golf Resort Traditions Golf Club 71 Golf Resort Source: City of La Quinta 2018/19 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. ' La Quinta Resort & Club and PGA West are accounted for as one entity; as such, their employment numbers are reported together as of FY 2015-16. Many La Quinta residents work in other communities, and many residents from other cities work in La Quinta. Table II-9 describes the employment locations of La Quinta residents. As shown, only 23.1% of City residents work in La Quinta. A quarter (25.0%) work in Palm Desert. Table II-9 Commuting Patterns Where La Quinta Residents Work No. of La Quinta Residents % of Total Indio 1,o87 14.1 Cathedral City 254 3.3 Palm Desert 1,933 25.0 Palm Springs 827 10.7 Coachella 438 5.7 La Quinta 1,788 23.1 Desert Hot Springs 44 o.6 Rancho Mirage 879 11.4 Indian Wells 484 6.3 Source: 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic PartnershlD. Table 6. Based on 201S data. General Income Characteristics Income can often vary significantly by region, industry, and type of job. Table II-io describes average income per worker by industry in the Coachella Valley. As shown, the highest -paying sectors are Finance/Insurance/Real Estate, Government, and Information, with incomes averaging around $50,000 to $6o,000. The lowest -paying sectors include Retail Trade, Other Services, and Leisure and Hospitality, with incomes averaging around $31,000. 38 382 Table II-10 Average Income by Industrv. Coachella Vallev Industry Average Income per Worker, 2017 Agriculture $29,571 Construction $45,488 Manufacturing $46,340 Retail Trade $32,281 Information $50,493 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate $59,726 Professional and Business Services $43,736 Education and Health Services $48,322 Leisure and Hospitality $31,513 Government $58,711 Other Services $31,836 Logistics $45,114 Source: 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership. Figure 2q The median household income in La Quinta in 2018 was $79,889, higher than the Riverside County median household income of $63,948. Since 2010, the median income for La Quinta residents has increased, with the 2010 median family income reported as $57,768 for the County of Riverside and $67,444 for the City of La Quinta. Household income estimates (2018) by total households are provided in Table II-11. Table II-11 2o18 Household Income Estimates Income Category Households % of Households Less than $10,000 901 5.8% $10,000-14,999 386 2.5% $15,000 - 24,999 846 5.5% $25,000 - 34,999 1,384 8.9% $35,000 - 49,999 1,771 11.4% $50,000 - 74,999 21201 14.2% $75,000 - 99,999 1,792 11.6% $100,000-149,999 2,872 18.5% $150,000-199,999 1,254 8.1% $200,000 or more 2,098 13.5% Total 115,505 100.0% Median Income $79,889 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP03 11 HOUSING PROFILE This section provides an overview of La Quinta's existing housing stock. Since the establishment of the La Quinta Hotel in 1926, La Quinta has been considered a world class resort and has been a favored location for vacation and retirement homes. Generally, single-family residences were constructed on an individual basis from the 1950s until the La Quinta Country Club area was developed in the 196os. In 1975, a brief building boom began due to speculation. Recessions in the 198os and early 199os resulted in an oversupply of housing and little construction in the City. A rebound occurred beginning in the late 199os. As a result, the City has seen a rapid increase in residential development of all types, but predominantly single-family units. There are many projects clustered around recreation amenities. In many of these communities, second units and guest houses (typically used to house guests, extended family members, and service workers) are processed concurrently with the primary unit. The bust of subprime lending practices in the early and mid-2000s led to the Great Recession, which resulted in a steep decline in home values, rapid increase in foreclosures, and decrease in the number of households eligible to enter the ownership housing market. Construction of new housing slowed in La Quinta and many regional and national markets. Housing Characteristics Between 2012 and 2019, the number of housing units in the City increased by 1,179 units from 23,585 to 24,764 units. This change represents a 5.0 percent increase (see Table II-12). There are five types of housing units for which data is presented in Table II-12: detached and attached single family units, multifamily in a building Of 2 to 4, or 5 or more units, and mobile homes. The predominant type of dwelling unit in the City of La Quinta continues to be single-family detached. Together, detached and attached single-family homes comprised 88.0 percent of all units in the City in 2019. The number of multifamily (5 or more) units in the City increased by 31.9% from 2012 to 2019, although multifamily units represented 11.1 percent of the total housing stock in 2019. 40 384 Table II-13 shows the number of building permits issued for new residential construction in La Quinta between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2020, covering nearly all of the 2014-2021 planning period. The data show that 944 permits were issued. The majority (92.7%) were for single-family detached units, 4.0% were for single-family attached units, 2.2% were for multi -family 3-4 units, and 1.1% were for multi -family 5+ units. Table II-12 Housing Stock Trends — 2012 to 2019 Building Type 2012 2019 Change 2012- 2019 Units % of Units % of # Total' Total' Single -Family 18,622 79.0 19,310 78.o 688 3.7 Detached Single -Family 2,387 10.1 2,476 10.0 89 3.7 Attached Multifamily, 2-4 1,127 4.8 1,140 4.6 13 1.2 units Multifamily, 5 or 1,218 5.2 1,607 6.5 389 31.9 more units Mobile Homes 231 1.0 231 1.0 0 0 Total Dwelling 23,585 100.0 24,764 100.0 1,179 5.0 Units Source: Department of Finance Table E-5, 2012 and 2019. ' differences due to roundime Table II-13 New Residential Construction, 2014-2020 Building Permit Type No. of Permits' Percent of Total Residential Dwellings: Single -Family Detached 875 92.7% Single -Family Attached 38 4.0% Multi -Family 3-4 units 21 2.2% Multi -Family, 5+ units 10 1.1% Total Permits: 944 100.0% Source: La Quinta Building Division ' Permits issued between 1/01/14 through 12/31/20 Households Before current housing problems can be understood and future needs anticipated, housing occupancy characteristics need to be identified. The following is an analysis of household type, growth, tenure, and vacancy trends. By definition, a "household" consists of all the people occupying a dwelling unit, whether or not they are related. A single person living in an apartment is a household, just as a couple with two children living in the same dwelling unit is considered a household. 385 From 2010 to 2o18, the number of La Quinta households grew from 14,802 to 15,505 at a 4.6% rate, as shown in Table II-14. In 2o18, the majority of households (56.7%) consisted of married couple families, followed by non -family households (29.2%). Table II-14 Household Growth Trends (2010 — 2o18) Year Number of # Increase % Increase Household s 2010 14,820 - - 2o18 15,505 1 685 1 4.6 Source: 2010 U.S. Census, Table P28; American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02 Table II-15 Household Tvves Household Type No. of Households % of Total Family households: 10,977 70.8 Married couple family 8,797 56.7 Male householder, no wife present 747 4.8 Female householder, no husband present 1,433 9.2 Non -family households 4,528 29.2 Total Households 15,505 100 Average Household Size 2.62 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates, Table DPo2 Housing Tenure The number of owner -occupied housing units in the City has not fluctuated much since 2010. In 2018, La Quinta owners occupied 76 percent of total units in the City, compared to 75.2 percent in 2010. Vacancy The vacancy rate is a measure of the general availability of housing. It also indicates how well the types of units available meet the current housing market demand. A low vacancy rate suggests that many households have found housing. However, fewer vacant housing units remain available and households needing housing may have difficulty finding housing within their price range. A high vacancy rate may indicate either the existence of a high number of units undesirable for occupancy or an oversupply of housing units. 42 386 As shown in Table II-16, the vacancy rate in La Quinta was 38.3 percent (9,638 units) in 2018, reflecting the seasonal resort character of the City. Among the vacant units, 31.8 percent of total housing units in the City are for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use. On that basis, the City's actual net vacancy rate is 6.5%, including 353 units available for rent, 596 available for sale, 271 rented or sold and awaiting occupancy, and 414 of other vacant status. Of the 15,505 (61.7%) occupied housing units in the City, about 71.8% are owner -occupied, and 28.2% are renter -occupied. The homeowner vacancy rate is 5.o%, and the rental vacancy rate is 7.4%, both of which are moderately low. Table II-16 Vacancy Status Vacancy Status Units Percentage Occupied Units Owner -occupied 11,125 44•2 Renter -Occupied 4,380 17.4 Subtotal 15,505 61.7 Vacant Units For rent 353 1.4 Rented, not occupied 28 0.1 For sale only 596 2.4 Sold, not occupied 243 1.0 For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 8,004 31.8 For migrant workers o 0 Other vacant 414 1.6 Subtotal 9,638 38.3 Total Units 25,143 100 Vacancy Rate: Homeowner vacancy rate - 5.0 Rental vacancy rate 7.4 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Tables DP04 and B25004 Age and Condition of Housing Housing age is a factor for determining the need for rehabilitation. Without proper maintenance, housing units deteriorate over time. Also, older houses may not be built to current housing standards for fire and earthquake safety. Approximately 71.4 percent of the housing stock in the City of La Quinta has been built since 199o, and about 44 percent of the current stock has been constructed since 2000 (see Table II-12). Less than 5 percent was constructed prior to 1970. IN The oldest homes in the City are found in the Cove neighborhood. Of the older single-family homes, many are well maintained and are mostly occupied by long term residents. A small proportion of older homes have not been well -maintained. These homes are typically smaller than new homes in the City; some less than 1,000 square feet. As land values increase, it will become economically viable to replace or rehabilitate some of these structures. These homes are primarily in the Cove area and behind City Hall. Outside of the Cove area, the homes are generally newer. Many new units in these other areas are custom homes in gated communities and are maintained by their owners in accordance with the requirements of a homeowners association. Table II-17 Age of Housing Stock in La Quinta Year Built Total Percentage After2014 125 0.5 2010-2013 276 1.1 2000-2009 10,651 42.4 1990-1999 6,901 27.4 1980-1989 4,235 16.8 1970-1979 1,762 7.0 1960-1969 460 1.8 1950-1959 459 1.8 1940-1949 153 0.6 Before 1939 121 0.5 Total Stock 25,143 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2oi8 5-Year Estimates, Table DP04 Housing is considered substandard when conditions are found to be below the minimum standards of living defined by Section loos of the Uniform Housing Code. Households living in substandard conditions are considered as needing housing assistance even if they are not seeking alternative housing arrangements. According to a zoo? City-wide housing conditions survey (see Housing Conditions Survey, below), the majority of units needing minor or moderate rehabilitation are in the Cove area. Many of the housing units in the Cove area are more than 30 years old. After 30 years homes generally require major rehabilitation, such as a new roof or updated plumbing. 44 388 Another measure of potentially substandard housing is the number of housing units lacking adequate kitchen and plumbing facilities. In La Quinta, there are 83 units (0.54% of all units) lacking complete kitchens and 61 units (0.39% of all units) lacking plumbing facilities. More homeowner units have deficiencies than rental units. These homes could potentially benefit from rehabilitation programs. Table II-18 Housing Units Lacking, Facilities Owner -Occupied Units Renter -Occupied Units Total Total Percent Total Percent Percent No. Units of Total No. Units in of Total No. of Total Type of Deficiency in City Units City Units Units Lacking complete 69 11,125 0.62 14 4,380 0.32 83 0.54 kitchen facilities Lacking plumbing 61 11,125 0.55 0 4,380 0 61 0.39 facilities Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables B25053 and B25049 Housing Conditions Survey The last citywide survey of housing conditions was conducted in November 2007. Homes were evaluated based on the condition of structural elements (walls, supports, columns), doors and windows, paint and cosmetics, roofing, and landscape and streetscape. The survey found that most homes were in good condition and required little or no maintenance or repairs. Approximately 7% of the housing stock (1,408 units) was categorized as "Deferred Maintenance" and needed minor repairs, such as refreshed paint and landscaping. Thirty- six (36) units were designated "Minor Rehabilitation" and demonstrated numerous deferred maintenance conditions; 83% of these units were in the Cove. Twenty-three (23) units designated "Moderate Rehabilitation" were in a deficient state and needed major roof repair, window replacement, or similar repairs; 87% of them were in the Cove. Four (4) units were designated "Substantial Rehabilitation or Replacement"; they required complete replacement of roofs, walls, and/or other structural elements and their condition endangered the health, safety, or well-being of occupants. The City has not conducted a housing conditions survey since 2007; however, one is planned for fiscal year 2021/2022. The Code Compliance staff is proactive in its work to track property maintenance. As described above, the primary area where maintenance issues occur is in the Cove. The City offers programs that assist homeowners and apartment complex owners with home maintenance and repair costs. Homeowners interested in reducing their utility bills IN through upgrades now have an alternative to tapping their mortgage for home equity loans. Through partnership with the City of La Quinta, HERO and Ygrene are offering low -fixed interest rates and flexible payment terms of up to 20 years, with repayments made through property taxes. Currently, both programs offer a wide array of home energy products including: windows, skylights, and doors; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; solar panels; roofing and insulation; artificial turf; and drip irrigation. In addition, Ygrene also offers pool pumps and related equipment and lighting products; HERO offers electric vehicle charging stations and water heating products. Rooms per Unit Table II-ig shows the number of bedrooms per unit, ranging from no bedroom (studios) to five or more bedrooms. Table II-ig also describes the number of bedrooms per unit, in relation to the total number of units for both 2011 and 2o18. The most prominent change proportionally was in no -bedroom (studio) units, which increased 1.7 percent from 2011 to 2o18. This change may be a combination of additional guest houses, a popular addition in the City, and accessory dwelling units, which have in recent years become more common. Table II-ig Bedrooms Per Unit, 201111-M8 Bedrooms Per Unit 2011 % of Total 2o18 % of Total % Change Studio (no bedroom) 172 o.8 622 2.5 1.7 1 1,145 5.2 1,307 5.2 0 z 4,046 18.3 4,278 17.0 -1.3 3 11,772 53.3 13,305 52.9 -0.4 4 4,441 20.1 5,125 20.4 0.3 5+ 506 2.3 5o6 z.0 -0.3 Total 22,o82 100 25,143 100.0 Source: 2009-2013 and 2014-2o18 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables 1325041. ' This category represents percent change in proportional terms. Table II-zo identifies the number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit by tenure. Three -bedroom units constituted the majority of housing stock (approximately 55 and 49.4 percent, respectively) of both owner and rental units. In ownership units, those with two, three, or four bedrooms made up 96.7 percent of units, while the same bedroom mix made up only 82.1 percent of rental units. As would be expected, rental units contained a much higher proportion of one -bedroom units, providing housing for those who are young, mobile or do not earn enough to enter homeownership. 46 390 Table II-20 Bedrooms in Dwelling Unit by Tenure, M8 Tenure Number Percentage Owner Occupied 11,125 100 Studio (no bedroom) 42 0.4 1 bedroom 93 0.8 2 bedrooms 1,721 15.5 3 bedrooms 6,124 55.0 4 bedrooms 2,912 26.2 5 or more bedrooms 233 2.1 Renter Occupied 4,380 100 Studio (no bedroom) 78 1.8 1 bedroom 697 15.9 2 bedrooms 989 22.6 3 bedrooms 2,165 49.4 4 bedrooms 443 10.1 5 or more bedrooms 8 0.2 Total 15,505 100 Studio (no bedroom) 46 0.8 1 bedroom 686 5.1 2 bedrooms 2,200 17.5 3 bedrooms 7,655 53.5 4 bedrooms 2,952 21.6 5 or more bedrooms 332 1.6 Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables 1325042. Housing Costs This section discusses values of ownership housing, and average rental prices for rental housing. La Quinta's for -sale and rental properties range from multimillion -dollar estates to very low-income subsidized units. Home Values The table above compares median housing values in Coachella Valley cities from 2013 to 2018. La Quinta's median housing value was $348,400 in 2013, which was lower than Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells, but higher than the other cities. Its median value increased l0.8% over the 5- year period, which was the third lowest percent increase in the region. However, the City's median housing value still ranks third highest in the Coachella Valley. 391 Table II-21 Regional Median Housing Value Trends, 2013 - 20i8 Jurisdiction Median Value, owner -occupied units % Change 2013-2018 2013 2018 Desert Hot Springs $121,600 $174,900 43.8% Palm Springs $267,800 $367,900 37.4% Cathedral City $179,500 $259,900 44.8% Rancho Mirage $518,000 $499,900 -3.5% Palm Desert $308,000 $335,400 9.0% Indian Wells $604,600 $706,800 16.9% La Quinta $348,400 $386,200 1o.8% Indio $192,600 $267,900 39.1% Coachella $137,600 $207,300 50.7% Source: American Community Survey 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table B25077 Table II-22 shows that nearly a third (32.5%) of owner -occupied units were valued between $300,000 to $499,999 in 2018, followed by 26% in the $500,000 to $999,999 range and 21.6% in the $200,000 to $299,999 range. Currently, 36% of owner -occupied units are worth $500,000 or more, and 31.6% are valued below $300,000. Table II-22 Housing Values in La Quinta, 20i8 Owner -occupied units value Number Percent Less than $50,000 240 2.2% $50,000 to $99,999 153 1.4% $100,000 to $149,999 135 1.2% $150,000 to $199,999 581 5.2% $200,000 to $299,999 2,404 21.6% $300,000 to $499,999 3,612 32.5% $500,000 to $999,999 2,888 26.o% $1,000,000 or more 1,112 10.0% Total 11,125 100 Median (dollars) 386,200 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP04 New Homes While the volume of new homes shrank by 30.6% from 2017 to 2018, the median price of new homes also decreased by 27.4%from 2018 to 2019.5 Although housing starts do not compare to pre -Recession levels, the market has recovered slowly. 48 392 During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City and non-profit organizations arranged financing for rehabilitation and expansion of affordable housing units at the Washington Street Apartments. The project, located on approximately 11.5 acres, included the substantial rehabilitation of all 72 existing units, construction of 68 new units, construction of 2 new community buildings, laundry facilities, a fitness center, and 2 swimming pools. The Coral Mountain project was also constructed during this period, providing 174 low and moderate income units. Currently pending residential housing projects are listed in the following table. As shown, approximately 2,822 single-family and multi -family units are either under review, approved, or under construction. Table II-23 Pendine~ Residential Proiects Development Name Acres No. of Dwelling Units Type of Dwelling Units Status Mountain Village Residences 0.22 6 multi -family apts. under review Estate Collection at Coral Mountain 20 57 single-family approved SilverRock Phase 1 46.6 29 Single-family approved Travertine 800 1,200 single-family under review Centre at La Quinta 22 133 multi -family condos approved Desert Club Apartments 0.7 16 multi -family apts. approved Floresta 20.8 82 single-family under construction Residence Club at PGA West 3 11 single-family approved Canyon Ride 28.3 74 single-family approved Codorniz 15 142 single-family under construction SilverRock Phase 2 30.5 66 hotel branded condos approved Estates at Griffin Lake 30 78 single-family approved Monterra 14 40 single-family in final phase Signature at PGA West 42 230 single-family approved The Peak Mixed Use 0.38 8 multi -family apts. under review La Quinta Penthouses 12.74 8 multi -family apts. under review Jefferson Street Apartments 5.36 42 multi -family apts. under review Coral Mountain Resort 320 600 single-family under review Total Units: 2,822 Rental Costs The rental housing market in La Quinta includes apartments, townhomes, condos/co-ops, and single-family homes. Table II-24 shows median gross rent by number of bedrooms, according to the American Community Survey. The median gross rent is $1,473. i• Table II-24 Median Gross Rent by Bedrooms (2o18) No. of Bedrooms Median Gross Rent* No bedroom $797 1 bedroom $396 z bedrooms $1,2o6 3 bedrooms $1,731 4 bedrooms $2,176 5+ bedrooms not provided Median Gross Rent: $1,473 * estimated, renter -occupied housing units paying cash rent Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates, Table 132s0:0 Online listings show that current market rental rates generally range from approximately $1,330 to $1,80o for a 1-bedroom unit; $1,400 to $3,500 for a 2-bedroom unit; $2,000 to $4,500 for a 3-bedroom unit; and $2,400 to $5,000 for a 4+-bedroom unit.6 Although rental rates for some units are much higher than reflected in these ranges, they are generally outliers and not reflective of the majority. No studio apartment listings were found in the search. Affordable Rental Units The majority of apartment rental properties are offered at costs comparable to the average rental costs for the Coachella Valley as a whole. The affordability of rental housing in La Quinta is not directly tied to the density of the project; rather, prices range based on condition, on -site amenities, location, and unit size. New rental projects in La Quinta, particularly affordable projects, are incorporating more aspects of sustainable design and green building. There are 28 affordable single-family rental units in La Quinta, all of which have 3 bedrooms. Additionally, there are nine affordable multi- family housing complexes offering a total of 912 affordable multi -family rental units,? including HUD apartments, Section 8 apartments, public housing apartments, non-profit senior and family low-income apartments, and Low-income tax credit apartments (LI HTC).8 Five of the complexes are available to residents of all ages, including the following: Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes, constructed in 20o8, provides 80 rental units affordable to extremely low, very low, and low income households. Vista Dunes was the first very low-income multifamily 6 Rent.com, accessed June 1, 2020. Affordable Housing Program, Single -Family Rental Units and Multi -Family Rental Units, City of La Quinta, updated July 8, zozo. 8 LowlncomeHousing.us, accessed June 1, zozo. 50 394 project of its size in the country to achieve LEED Platinum certification. The project provides a swimming pool, playground, basketball court, and large community multipurpose room. Vista Dunes offers one- to three -bedroom apartments. Wolff Waters Place, built in 2009, includes 216 green -built one- to four- bedroom apartments that are affordable to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households. Wolff Waters Place is a Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) project. Aventine Apartments provides zo units for low and moderate income households. Coral Mountain Apartments includes 174 units for low and moderate income households. Villa Cortina Apartments provides 116 moderate income restricted rentals. Four apartment complexes are dedicated to senior affordable rentals, including: Hadley Villas (79 units) offers extremely low, very low, and low income one -bedroom villas and accepts HUD subsidies. Depending on availability, rent will be based on 30% of the Adjusted Gross Income for persons qualifying for low income housing. Seasons At Miraflores La Quinta is a Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment with 116 extremely low and very low income one - to two -bedroom apartments. The LIHTC gives incentives to builders and developers to provide affordable housing to low income persons. The maximum rent charged is based on the Area Median Income (AM I). Seasons At La Quinta is a Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment and provides 87 extremely low, low, and moderate income apartments. Washington Street Apartments was recently renovated and expanded and re -opened in late 2019. It provides 140 units for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income seniors, nearly doubling its previous capacity. Thirteen (13) of these units are affordable through Section 8. 3�5 HOUSING NEEDS The following analysis of current City housing conditions addresses housing needs and concerns relative to various segments of the population. Several factors will influence the degree of demand or need for new housing in La Quinta in coming years. The four major "needs" categories considered in this element are: Overpayment: renters and homeowners who pay more than 30 percent of their gross incomes for shelter. Overcrowding: In response to higher housing prices, lower income households must often be satisfied with smaller, less adequate housing for available money. Special Needs: Special needs are those associated with demographic groups that call for very specific program responses, such as preservation of residential hotels or the development of four - bedroom apartments. State law specifically requires analysis of the special housing needs of the elderly, the disabled, single - parent households, large families, farm workers, and homeless persons. Future Housing Needs: To meet future needs of local and regional population and employment growth, SCAG developed the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which establishes both the projected need for non -market -rate housing and the "fair share" distribution of the projected need to each jurisdiction in each market area. Overpayment and Housing Affordability State housing policy recognizes that cooperative participation of the private and public sectors is necessary to expand housing opportunities to all economic segments of the community. Historically, the private sector generally responds to the majority of the community's housing needs through the production of market -rate housing. However, the percentage of the population on a statewide basis who can afford market -rate housing is declining. The State of California and HUD determined that affordable housing should consume no more than 30 percent of household gross income for lower and moderate -income households. A household spending greater than 30 percent of their gross income on housing is considered to be overpaying. 52 396 Table II-25 lists the percentage of renters and homeowners who overpay for housing, based on 2012-2016 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data. CHAS data are compiled by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to evaluate the extent of housing problems and needs, particularly for low income households, based on Census data. Approximately 36.8 percent of all households in La Quinta spent more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs ("overpay"). A roughly equal proportion of owner and renter households (36.5% and 37.3%, respectively) experienced overpayment. Among extremely low-income households, 61.5 percent of renters and 78.4 percent of homeowners overpaid for housing. Among very low-income households, 7o.8 percent of renters and 85.6 percent of homeowners overpaid for housing. Among low-income households, 64.9 percent of renters and 69.5 percent of homeowners overpaid. Furthermore, many of these households were actually paying more than 50 percent of their gross household income for housing ("severely overpaying"). Note that the proportions of households overpaying or severely overpaying are higher for lower -income households as a group, indicating that the cost burden of overpayment falls disproportionately on lower -income households and renters. These overpayment estimates reflect the need for affordable housing in the City, particularly for lower income households for rental and purchase. IS Table II-25 Overpayment by Income Category and Tenure Household Income' Owners Renters Households % Households less than or = 3o% HAMFI (Extremely Low Income) 58o 870 overpaying 455 78.4 535 61.5 severely overpaying 385 66.4 350 40.2 >30% to less than or =5o% HAMFI (Very Low Income) 835 565 overpaying 715 85.6 400 7o.8 severely overpaying 475 56.9 220 38.9 >50% to less than or =8o% HAMFI (Low Income) 1,375 655 overpaying 955 69.5 425 64.9 severely overpaying 510 37.1 18o 27.5 Subtotal: All lower -income households 2,790 2,090 Subtotal: All lower -income HH overpaying 2,125 76.2 1,36o 65.1 Subtotal: All lower -income HH severely overpaying 1,370 49.1 750 35.9 >8o% to less than or =t00% HAMFI (Moderate Income) 755 425 overpaying 415 55.0 125 29.4 severely overpaying 150 19.9 55 12.9 >100% HAMFI (Moderate and Above Moderate Income) 7,o8o 2,095 overpaying 1,340 18.9 235 11.2 severely overpaying 295 4.2 15 0.7 Total Households 1o,625 4,610 Total Households Overpaying 3,88o 36.5 1,720 37.3 Total Households Severely Overpaying 1 1,815 1 17.1 820 1 17.8 1 HAMFI = HUD Area Median Family Income. HUD and CA HCD use different terminology/methodology to define Household Income, but they are roughly equivalent. The table above matches HCD's terminology ("extremely low, very low, low") commonly used in HE documents to HUD categories, where appropriate. Note that "moderate" refers to 80%-120% of AM I, and thus is noted in two HUD categories accordingly. "Overpaying" is defined as spending >30% of gross household income on housing costs. "Severely overpaying" is defined as spending >50% of gross household income on housing costs. Source: U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, CHAS data for La Quinta, based on 2012-2o16 ACS. A distinction between renter and owner housing overpayment is important because, while homeowners may overextend themselves financially to afford a home purchase, the owner maintains the option of selling the home and may realize tax benefits or appreciation in value. Renters, on the other hand, are limited to the trends of the rental market. Overpayment among the moderate and above moderate -income categories is a reflection of current economic conditions. In addition, some owner households choose to allocate a higher percentage of their disposable monthly income on housing costs because this allocation is justified in light of investment qualities of ownership. 54 398 Table II-26 identifies the affordable rents and purchase prices, by income category, for a one -person household, a two -person household, and a family of four. Affordable rental rates and ownership (mortgage) costs are generally based on 30 percent of gross income. Table II-26 Affordable Housing Costs by Annual Income Income Category' Annual Income Limit Maximum Affordable Monthly Rent Payment 2 Maximum Affordable Monthly Mortgage Payment 3 Maximum Affordable Home Purchase Price Single -Person Household Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $15,850 $396 $452 $58,750 Very Low (30%-50% of AM I) $26,400 $660 $753 $97,750 Low (5o%-8o% of AMI) $42,200 $1,055 $1,054 $136,900 Moderate (80%-120% of AMI) $63,250 $1,581 $1,933 $251,100 Above Moderate (120%+ of AMI) $63,250+ Above $1,581 Above $1,933 Above $251,100 Median $52,700 $1,318 Two -Person Household Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $18,100 $453 $508 $66,000 Very Low (30%-50%ofAMI) $30,150 $754 $847 $110,000 Low (5o%-8o% of AMI) $48,200 $i,205 $i,i86 $i54,000 Moderate (80%-120% of AMI) $72,300 $i,8o8 $2,i74 $282,400 Above Moderate (i20%+ of AMI) $72,300+ Above $i,8o8 Above $2,i74 Above $282,400 Median $60,250 $i,5o6 Four -Person Household Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $26,200 $655 $565 $73,450 Very Low (30%-50% of AMI) $37,650 $941 $941 $i22,200 Low 5o%-8o% of AMI $60,250 $i,5o6 $i,318 $i71,250 Moderate 80%-i20% of AMI $90,350 $2,259 $2,4i6 $313,650 Above Moderate (120%+ of AMI) $90,350+ Above $2,259 Above $2,416 Above $313,650 Median $75,300 $1,883 ' AMI = area median income. 2 Based on 30 percent of monthly income. 3 From Riverside County/City of La Quinta zozo Affordable Ownership Housing Cost Limits. Assumes single -person household lives in 1-bedroom unit; 2-person household lives in 2-bedroom unit; 4-person household lives in 3-bedroom unit. 4 Converts the "Maximum Affordable Monthly Mortgage Payment" to a home value, assuming lo% down, 15-yearfixed, 4.0% interest rate,1.25% taxes and homeowner's insurance monthly. Source: HCD zozo State Income Limits Affordability of Homeownership Home values have generally increased in the Coachella Valley during 2013 to 2018 (see Table II-21). Some new and fairly new homes are for sale at prices that are affordable to median and moderate -income households (see Table II-22). However, many homes are out of reach for lower income and many moderate households in the City. Table II-22 shows that La Quinta has a wide range of housing values. The median housing value is $386,200. Units valued at less than $ioo,000, which 399 would be affordable to extremely low income households and very low single -person households, comprise only 3.6% of all units in the City. Only 4.8% of ownership units are valued at less than $15o,000, and only lo% of ownership units are valued at less than $200,000, which would be in the range affordable to low-income households. Therefore, it could be challenging for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households to enter the homeownership market. To expand homeownership opportunities, the City coordinates with nonprofit agencies that provide relief to low-income residents and develop affordable ownership units, and assists with securing third party financing. The City also supports the use of affordable housing rent -to -own transition programs; developers who agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low-income households can receive federal tax credits under the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, and lower income residents have opportunities to invest and gain equity in their homes. The City also provides interested homeowners with information about grants and other resources available for home repairs and/or rehabilitation. Affordability of Rental Costs As shown previously in Table II-26 median rent for a 1-bedroom unit is $396; the above table shows that single -person households in all income categories could afford a monthly rent payment of $396 or higher and, therefore, should be able to afford a 1-bedroom unit. Median rent for a 2-bedroom unit is $1,2o6; however, the table above shows that two - person households in the extremely low and very low-income categories would not have enough income to afford such a unit. Median rent for a 3-bedroom unit is $1,731; however, the table above shows that four - person households in the extremely low, very low, and low-income categories would not have enough income to afford such a unit. Hundreds of lower and moderate -income households are served by existing affordable housing and other projects. With the market -rate rental market essentially closed to extremely low and very low-income households, however, it is evident that their major source of affordable housing will continue to be found through income -restricted housing projects, housing voucher programs, accessory dwelling units, and employee/guest houses. Overcrowding The Bureau of the Census defines overcrowded housing units as "those in excess of one person per room average" and severely overcrowded housing units as "those in excess of 1.5 persons per room average". 56 400 Overcrowding may occur when a family or household cannot afford adequate living space, houses extended family members, or is sharing inadequate living space with nonfamily members. When more than one family shares a housing unit it is called doubling. Households with lower incomes may permit overcrowding to derive additional income, or there may be insufficient supply of housing units in the community to accommodate the demand. La Quinta has 577 overcrowded and severely overcrowded housing units, which represents 3.7% of the total 15,505 occupied units in the City. Table II-27 shows that 3.2 percent of the total occupied housing units were moderately overcrowded in 2o18, an increase from 2.4 percent from 2009-2011. A higher incidence of overcrowding was experienced among the rental tenure group. Although renter households constituted only 28.2 percent of all households in the City, approximately 1o.9 percent of renters experienced overcrowded conditions, with 1.6 percent of all renters experiencing severe overcrowding. In comparison, within owner -occupied households, o.9 percent experienced overcrowded conditions, with o.1 percent experiencing severe overcrowding. Table II-27 Overcrowding Owner Renter Total Households %of %of %of Status Number Owner Number Renters Number Total Not Overcrowded 11,025 99•1 3,903 89•1 14,92$ 96.3 Moderately Overcrowded 86 0.8 406 9.3 492 3.2 Severely Overcrowded 14 0.1 71 1.6 85 0.5 Total 11,125 1 100.0 1 4,38o 1 100.0 1 15,505 1 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates, Table B25014. Note: Universe is total households in occupied housing units. Housing units that exceed i.o or more persons per room are considered moderately overcrowded. Housing units that exceed 1.5 or more persons per room are considered severely overcrowded. Special Populations The state requires that the special needs of certain disadvantaged groups be addressed in the Housing Element. Selected populations with special housing needs include seniors, persons with disabilities, large families, single -parent households, the homeless, and farm workers. Cif Seniors The special housing needs of senior residents are an important concern for the City of La Quinta, since many retired persons residing in the City are likely to be on fixed low incomes. Besides affordability concerns, seniors may have special needs related to housing design and location. With regard to housing design needs, seniors may require ramps, handrails, and lower cupboards and counters, etc., to allow greater access and mobility. They also may need special security devices for their homes for greater self-protection. Seniors may also have special needs regarding location, such as the need for access to public facilities (i.e., medical and shopping) and transit. In many instances, seniors prefer to stay in their own dwellings rather than relocate to a retirement community and may need assistance making home repairs or modifications. Every effort should be made to maintain their dignity, self-respect, safety, and quality of life. As shown in the following table, 5,883 householders (37.9% of all householders) are 65 years or older. Senior households comprise 43.8% of all owner -occupied units, and 23.0% of all renter -occupied units. Table II-28 City of La Quinta Senior Households by Tenure Householder Age Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Households %' Households Non -Senior Households Under 65 years 6,251 56.2 3371 77.0 Senior Households 65 to 74 years 3,015 27.1 524 12.0 75 to 84 years 1,519 13.7 3z6 7.4 85 years and over 340 3.1 159 3.6 Subtotal, Senior Households 4,874 43.8 1,009 23.0 Total Households 11,125 100.0 4,380 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table B25007 ' differences due to roundinpr According to the American Community Survey, an estimated 896 seniors have incomes below the poverty level, which represents 9.o% of all seniors in the City. The 2020 federal poverty guideline for one person is $12,760. The major source of income for most seniors is Social Security, and the average Social Security monthly benefit is $1,503.9 Therefore, a single senior paying 30% of their monthly Social Security income on housing costs would pay $451 toward housing costs. However, La Quinta 9 Social Security Administration Fact Sheet, December 2019 Beneficiary Data. 58 402 median rents are $797 for a studio unit, and $396 for a one -bedroom unit (most likely not a separate unit given the relative price). A two -person senior household would have $902 available for housing costs, but median rents are $1,2o6 for a 2-bedroom unit. Therefore, Social Security alone most likely cannot adequately cover housing costs in the City. Table II-29 Senior Incomes Below the Poverty Level Age Group No. of Residents with Income in Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 65 to 74 years 541 75 years and over 355 Total 896 Source: 2014-2o18 ACS 5-Year Estimates, Table B17001 Apart from privately owned housing units, the City has several affordable rental options for senior living as discussed previously under rental units. They include: Seasons Senior Apartments, which offers 87 senior units in the extremely low, low, and moderate affordable price range; Seasons at Miraflores, a project completed in 2003 that supplies 118 senior units in the extremely low and very low income price range; Washington Street Apartments, which offers 14o extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income rentals (13 of these units are affordable through Section 8); and Hadley Villas Senior Apartments, an affordable project completed in 2004 that offers 79 units in the extremely low, very low, low, and above moderate income price range. Continued construction of multifamily units will aid greatly in meeting the needs of seniors currently overpaying for rental units. Numerous senior support services are provided by various organizations, including those listed in the following table. There are also numerous privately operated assisted living facilities and home care service providers in the City and Coachella Valley. CIR] Table II-30 Senior Resources Organization Services Provided Assisted living and home care providers (various private providers) Housing, personal care, health care, housekeeping, meals Braille Institute Coachella Valley Neighborhood Center Rehabilitation, enrichment classes, in -home support for the visually impaired La Quinta Wellness Center Health/fitness programs, social events, classes, homebound outreach, food distribution Eisenhower Memory Care Center Adult day center for neuro-cognitive impairments FIND Food Bank Food distribution Hidden Harvest Food distribution Jewish Family Services of the Desert Advocacy, case management services Riverside County Office on Aging Medical case management, counseling, transportation assistance, meals Salvation Army Food distribution, social events, community programs Senior Advocates of the Desert Public benefits and social services assistance, emergency financial assistance SunLine Transit Agency For seniors and disabled residents: Half -Fare Program, Taxi Voucher Program, Sun Dial paratransit service, bus travel training People with Disabilities A "disability" is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one of more major life activities. Housing elements must analyze the special housing needs of people with disabilities. Senate Bill No. 812 (2011) requires that the analysis include individuals with developmental disabilities. A developmental disability is defined by Section 4512 of the Welfare and Institutions Code as "a disability that originates before an individual becomes 18 years old, continues or can be expected to continue indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual." This includes intellectual disabilities, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, and related conditions, but does not include other handicapping conditions that are solely physical in nature. Physical and developmental disabilities can hinder access to housing units of traditional design, and potentially limit the ability to earn adequate income. The three major housing needs of the disabled are access, location, and affordability. Housing needs for individuals with disabilities can range from traditional independent living environments, to supervised group quarters, to institutions where medical care and other services are provided onsite. Important housing considerations for this group include proximity to public transportation, accessibility of the home and surroundings, access to medical and other public services, and affordability. 60 404 Disabled persons often require specially designed dwellings to provide access not only within the dwelling, but to and from the unit. Special modifications to permit free access are very important in maintaining safety, independence and dignity. The California Administrative Code Title 24 Requirements set forth access and adaptability requirements for the physically handicapped. These regulations apply to public buildings such as government facilities and motels, and require that ramps, larger door widths, restroom modifications, etc., be designed to enable free access to the handicapped. Such standards are not mandatory of new single-family residential construction. A number of disabled persons receive supplemental Social Security Income and are on fixed incomes. Increasing inflation and housing costs adversely affect these individuals' ability to secure affordable housing. The 2014-2o18 ACS identified 4,722 persons in the City with disabilities, of which 2,484 (52.6%) were persons over the age of 65. Individuals may be affected by one or more types of disability. The second most affected age groups are residents 18 to 64 years (42.2%). The table below identifies the number of disabilities, by type, for La Quinta residents. The most prevalent disabilities are ambulatory difficulties (26.6%) and independent living difficulties (17.8%). Group homes are listed as residential care facilities in the Zoning Ordinance, and are permitted by right in all residential zones. There are no use -specific standards for group homes, and they would require only a building permit for construction if occurring in a single family home environment, and with approval of a Site Development Permit if proposed as an apartment or similar multi -family project in the higher density zones. This same requirement also applies to apartment or multi -family project for any type of housing. 61 405 Table II-31 City of La Quinta Number of Disabilities. by Disability Tvne' Disability by Age and Type Number of Disabilities Percent of Total Disabilities' Under a e 18 242 2.8 Hearing Difficulty 4 0.05 Vision Difficulty 91 1.1 Cognitive Difficulty 130 1.5 Ambulatory Difficulty 0 0.0 Self -Care Difficulty 17 0.2 Independent Living Difficulty Ages 18-64 3088 37.4 Hearing Difficulty 291 3.4 Vision Difficulty 413 4.8 Cognitive Difficulty 845 9.9 Ambulatory Difficulty 746 8.8 Self -Care Difficulty 38o 4.5 Independent Living Difficulty 513 6.o Ages 65+ 5,088 59.7 Hearing Difficulty 1,024 12.0 Vision Difficulty 420 4.9 Cognitive Difficulty 548 6.4 Ambulatory Difficulty 1,530 18.0 Self -Care Difficulty 56o 6.6 Independent Living Difficulty 1,006 11.8 Total Disabilities 8,518 100.0 Total Civilian Non -Institutionalized Population with a Disability 4,722 differences due to rounding * data not provided Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5-Year Estimates, Table S1810 The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) implements a statewide system of community -based services for people with developmental disabilities and their families. DDS contracts with the Inland Regional Center (IRC) in Riverside to provide and coordinate local services in Riverside County, including the City of La Quinta. IRC currently (2021) serves 172 clients who are La Quinta residents. Facilities and services in the Coachella Valley that assist persons with developmental and physical disabilities include: o La Quinta Wellness Center connects seniors with Riverside County Meals on Wheels, an outreach program for homebound seniors, and SunLine Transit Agency for Dial -a -Ride transportation services. 62 406 o Angel View, a non-profit organization based in Desert Hot Springs, operates 19 six -bed group homes for children and young adults with developmental and physical disabilities. The homes provide 24-hour nursing and/or attendant care and can accommodate loo+ individuals at a time. There are 16 homes in the Coachella Valley, including 12 in Desert Hot Springs, 3 in Palm Springs, and 1 in Thousand Palms. o The Inland Regional Center uses person -centered planning when developing a Consumer's Individual Program Plan (IPP). The IPP outlines the goals developed by the Consumer and their support team, as well as the services and supports they will receive to help those goals. Many of the services/supports listed in the IPP are funded by Inland Regional Center. However, services and supports may also be provided by other agencies such as the Social Security Administration, school districts, county agencies, etc. o Canyon Springs in Cathedral City is a State developmental center operated by DDS with 55 licensed beds for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The treatment program at Canyon Springs is designed to provide its residents with work/job training, including formal educational opportunities and new home life and living skills. Referrals for admission are made by Regional Centers. Each person is assessed and will participate in developing and carrying out an Individual Program Plan. Residents have opportunities to participate in a variety of integrated activities in natural environments at home, at work, and in the community. o Desert AIDS Project - Palm Springs: Dedicated to providing support, care, and treatment to people with AIDS and related illnesses and education to the general community. The Desert AIDS project serves the psychological needs of AIDS clients, provides case management, anonymous HIV testing, legal services, a program of protection and prevention, and referral and recreational services. o FISH of Lower Coachella Valley - Coachella: Provides 2-3 days of emergency food for families/individuals in need. Clients may return for assistance every 14 days. o Desert Arc - Palm Desert: A comprehensive service delivery agency for people with developmental and intellectual disabilities; it provides programs to develop or enhance self-help skills, life enrichment skills, and prevocational and vocational skills. 604 o Braille Institute - Palm Desert: A nonprofit school providing daytime classes and other support programs and services for people with blindness and vision loss in the Coachella Valley. Large Family Households The 2014-2o18 ACS reported 1,543 households in the City of La Quinta with five or more persons, which constitutes 10 percent of all households. This represents a 17 percent increase from the 2009-2011 ACS (1,319 households). Large -family households generally require larger dwellings with more bedrooms to meet their housing needs, but these households often experience difficulty securing adequate housing suitable for their expanded needs due to income limitations and/or lack of adequate housing stock. Difficulties in securing housing large enough to accommodate all members of a household are heightened for renters, as multifamily rental units are typically smaller than single- family units. Table II-32 presents tenure of housing units by number of persons in the household based on 2014-2o18 ACS data. The table shows that large households are roughly equally comprised of owner occupied and renter occupied households (805 owner occupied, 738 renter occupied). Large owner -occupied units comprise 7.2 percent of all owner -occupied housing, and large renter -occupied units comprise 16.8 percent of all renter -occupied units. Table II-32 Large Households by Tenure Number of Persons in Household Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Households % Households %1 One to Four 10,320 92.8 3,642 83.2 Five 577 5.2 410 9.4 Six 228 2.0 264 6.o Seven or More o 0 64 1.5 Total Households with 5+ Persons 805 7.2 738 16.8 Total Households 11025 100 4,380 100 differences due to rounding Source: American Communitv Survey 2014-2o18 S-Year Estimates. Table B2500q Multifamily housing rental stock consists primarily of one-, two -and three -bedroom units. Single family development in the Cove is made up largely of units with three bedrooms, although four -bedroom units are also present in limited supply. As shown in Table II-32, there are 3,284 units with 4 or more bedrooms, which exceeds the current number of large families. Citywide single-family construction activity has created a 64 408 supply of housing for large families not available in multifamily housing, although prices for larger units tend to be affordable only to moderate and above moderate income households. Suitable housing products for large families include those with sufficient bedrooms that are near childcare facilities, schools, recreational areas, and public transit. In the current housing stock, 577 units (3.7% of all units citywide) are overcrowded, and the majority (82.7%) of them are rental units. There are 332 units with 5 or more bedrooms (1.6% of total units citywide), and only 8 of them are rental units, so there may be a need for additional larger units, particularly rental units. Given the lack of larger rental units, programs that assist large families with homeownership would be beneficial. Reduced parking standards for units with 5 or more bedrooms may also incentivize development of larger rental units. For instance, certain affordable housing developments may be granted a maximum parking ratio of two and one- half parking spaces for four or more bedrooms (La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.60.26o.E. Incentives and Concessions). Single -Parent Households Single -parent heads of household constitute a group with serious housing concerns. In general, families with single -parent heads of household may experience a higher incidence of poverty than other household configurations. In particular, female -headed households can experience lower incomes, higher living expenses, higher poverty rates, and low rates of homeownership. Finding adequate and affordable housing is a high priority. Special considerations for this population include proximity to schools, childcare, employment, and health care. Table II-33 Single -Parent Household Characteristics No. of Household Type Households % of Total Total households 15,505 100 Male -headed households 747 4.8 With own children under 18 437 2.8 Female -headed households 1,433 9.2 With own children under 18 788 5.1 Total Families, Income in the Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 625 100 Male Householders, Income in the Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 0 0 Female Householders, Income in the Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 255 4o.8 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2ol8 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02; ACS 2o18 SUDDlemental Estimates Detailed Table K201701 4 As shown in Table II-33, there were 2,18o single -parent -headed family households in La Quinta, or 14% of all households, in 2018. Male -headed family households comprise 4.8% of all households, and female -headed family households comprise 9.2%. As shown in the table above, of the 1,433 female -headed family households in La Quinta, more than half (55%) of the female -headed households have children under age 18. While no male -headed households were below the poverty level in the past 12 months, female -headed households comprise 40.8% of all families with incomes below the poverty level. The number of single -parent -headed and female -headed family households both declined compared to 2010 (2,026 single -parent households, of which 1,461 were female -headed). However,17.8 percent of the City's female -headed families live in poverty as compared to 16.1 percent in 2010. Many single parents do not have the resources to enter the housing market as a homeowner. Although the incidence of single -parent households below the poverty level is low (1.6% of all households) in the City, addressing the housing needs for single parents may require innovative housing solutions. Strategies need to be considered to provide more housing opportunities to these households, such as new multifamily housing, mixed -use units, and subsidized single-family housing. Flexible educational programs and job training services can help householders obtain higher paying jobs. Farmworkers Based on an analysis of farm labor and the diminishing amount of farmland in the City of La Quinta and surrounding rural areas, the need for farm worker housing has declined. Most agricultural land and farmworker housing in the Coachella Valley are located in the eastern valley in and around the communities of Coachella, Thermal, and Mecca. While the zoning map includes a Low -Density Agriculture/Equestrian Residential Overlay, there is no land designated specifically for agricultural uses in the City's General Plan and zoning maps. There are also no zoning policies or restrictions specific to farms or farmworker housing. Based on 2014-2o18 ACS data, there were 352 persons employed in "agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining" in the City in 2o18, which constitutes z% of the City's civilian employed population 16 years and over (see Table II-6). It is probable that a number of occupations classified as agricultural are related to nursery operations or landscape maintenance. 66 410 Responsibility for providing housing for farm workers originally lay with the growers that employed the workers. This practice was discontinued, however, due to high costs for liability insurance and maintenance. Low income groups often need housing near work. For farmworkers, this means that housing is needed in rural, agricultural areas rather than urban areas. In the Coachella Valley, the principal housing options for migrant and local seasonal farm workers are family -owned homes, private rental houses, second units, apartments, and mobile homes. Farmworker housing does not appear to be a significant need in La Quinta. Nevertheless, farmworker households will benefit from rental subsidies and incentives provided by the City for developers to maintain affordable units that are available to all segments of the population. Extremely Low -Income Households Extremely low-income (ELI) households are households earning less than 30 percent of the HUD Area Median Family Income (HAMFI). The AMI for a 4-person household in Riverside County is $75,300. ELI household incomes are defined by HCD and HUD as those earning less than $26,2oo. These households often face significant financial challenges to affording adequate housing and, therefore, are considered a subpopulation with special housing needs. Table II-34 HousinEr Problems for Extremely Low -Income Households Owners Renters Total Total Number of ELI Households 580 870 1,450 Percent with any housing 79 3% 62.1% 69.0% problems* Percent with Cost Burden >30% of 78.4% 6i.5% 68.3% income Percent with Cost Burden >50% of 66.4% 40.2% 50.7% income * housing problems include incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room (overcrowding), and cost burden greater than 30% of income. Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, CHAS, based on the 2012-2o16 ACS. Existing Needs According to 2012-2o16 CHAS data, there are 1,45o extremely low- income households (9.5% of total households) in La Quinta, consisting of 58o owner households and 87o renter households. Proportionally more owners (79.3%) than renters (62.1%) experience housing problems, including incomplete kitchen and plumbing facilities, overcrowding, and cost burden greater than 30% of income (overpayment). 4 11 Extremely low-income households are sensitive to unexpected changes in income and expenditures, so overpayment for housing could result in an inability to meet other important or emergency needs. Projected Needs To calculate projected housing needs, the City assumed 50% of its very low income regional housing need assessment (RHNA) are extremely low income households. From its very low income need of 420 units, the City has a projected need of 210 units for extremely low income households. Many of the City's existing and proposed very low-income rental projects provide housing affordable to extremely low-income individuals, couples, and families with children. Extremely low-income households are also eligible to receive rental assistance in La Quinta through the County of Riverside Housing Authority's Section 8 voucher program. Small ELI households may also find an affordable housing option in Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and guest houses. SROs are permitted in the Regional Commercial zone with a Conditional Use Permit. A guest house/employee quarters is permitted as an accessory use in all residential zones, and can provide on -site living quarters for a homeowner's family members, staff, and guests. During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City updated the Zoning Code to remove constraints to the development of ADUs. ADUs are permitted as an accessory use in all residential zones and have some flexibility regarding parking and utility requirements. SROs, guest houses/employee quarters, and ADUs may be important resources for ELI households, including seniors on a fixed -income, single -parents, disabled persons, college students, and low -wage earning workers. Homeless Persons The Riverside County Department of Public Social Services completed a homeless count in 2020 for all cities and some unincorporated areas in the County. The Homeless Point -In -Time (PIT) Count is a federally mandated annual count of homeless individuals used to evaluate the extent of homelessness. The data provide a snapshot of homelessness on a particular date and time. The 2020 PIT Count for Riverside County determined there were 3 unsheltered persons in La Quinta, including individuals living on streets or in vehicles, encampments, storage structures, or other places unfit 68 412 for human habitation.10 This represents o.1% of the unsheltered individuals in Riverside County, and 0.5% of County Supervisory District 4 which includes the Coachella Valley and the City of Blythe. The actual number of homeless may be higher given that many individuals, particularly women and youth, remain hidden for safety or stay in locations where they cannot be seen. This represents a decrease from the County's 2019 PIT Count (9 individuals in La Quints). Fluctuations in the number of homeless individuals documented from year to year may be due to actual increases or decreases and/or changes in counting and surveying methods, such as increased coverage by more volunteers or enhanced promotion and awareness strategies of the overall count. Table II-35 describes the demographic characteristics of unsheltered people in La Quinta. 10 zozo Riverside County Homeless Point -In -Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June zozo, pages 83 and 122. 4 3 1 Table II-35 Characteristics of Unsheltered Individuals in La Quinta Number Percent of Total Race American Indian o o% Asian o o% Black 1 33% White z 66% Multiple Races o o% Native Hawaiian o o% Unknown Race o o% Ethnicity Hispanic z 66% Non -Hispanic 1 33% Ethnicity Unknown o o% Gender Male 3 100% Female o o% Trans ender o o% Gender Non -Conforming o o% Unknown Gender o o% Age Adults (>24 yrs) 3 i00% Youth (18-24) o o% Children (< 18) o o% Unknown Age o o% Living Situation Woods 1 33% Vehicle 1 33% Street 1 33% Encampment o o% Under Bridge o o% Park o o% Other o o% Bus o o% Abandoned Building o o% TOTAL UNSHELTERED INDIVIDUALS = 3 Source: zozo Riverside County Homeless Point -In -Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June zozo. Dales 83 and 122. Particularly sensitive homeless subpopulations include veterans, the chronically homeless, those with mental health conditions and physical disabilities, victims of domestic violence, and others. The zozo PIT Count also identified pet owners because of concerns that unsheltered individuals were not seeking shelter because they wanted to keep their pets. As shown in the following table, of the 3 unsheltered individuals interviewed in La Quinta, one had substance abuse issues, one was newly homeless, and one was a pet owner. 70 414 Table II-36 Homeless Unsheltered Subpomlations Subpopulation Number' Percent of Total Substance Abuse 1 33% PTSD 0 0% Mental Health Conditions 0 0% Physical Disability 0 0% Developmental Disability 0 0% Brain Injury 0 0% Victim of Domestic Violence 0 0% AIDS or HIV 0 0% Veterans 0 0% Chronically Homeless 0 0% Adults Only 3 100% Children Only 0 0% Families with Children 0 0% Pet Owners 1 33% Newly Homeless 1 33% Seniors (>_ 60) 0 0% Jail Release (within last 12 months) 0 0% ' Results of interviews with 3 homeless individuals. Source: 202o Riverside County Homeless Point -In -Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June zozo, DaLles 8,� and 122. Emergency, transitional, and supportive housing facilities and services can serve some of the short- and long-term needs of homeless individuals. Emergency shelters provide temporary shelter, often with minimal supportive services. Supportive housing is linked to support services intended to improve the individual's ability to independently live and work in the community. Transitional housing is provided with financial assistance and support services to help homeless people achieve independent living within 24 months. Supportive and transitional housing are often in apartment -style units. If a person or family finds themselves homeless, they may go to regional facilities provided by the county, City of Indio, or City of Palm Springs for assistance. The available homeless facilities in the Coachella Valley are listed in Table II-37. A recent analysis of Coachella Valley homelessness found that emergency shelter and transitional housing are not operating at full capacity; the occupancy rate was 79% in 2o18 despite high rates of unsheltered single adults." Lower occupancy may be partially because some beds are reserved for domestic violence victims and youth rather than the general population. " "The Path Forward: Recommendations to Advance an End to Homelessness in the Coachella Valley," Barbara Poppe and Associates, November 27, 2018, page 21. 475 The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), of which the City of La Quinta is a member, contracted with Path of Life Ministries to operate its Coachella Valley Housing First program that placed people in permanent housing before addressing issues such as joblessness or behavioral health. Program results were positive, with 81% of the 242 people who exited the program in the first year able to find permanent housing, and all participants who exited the program more than doubling their monthly incomes.12 In late 2019, CVAG initiated an effort to advance the goals of CV Housing First through a collaborative approach called the Coachella Valley Homelessness Engagement & Action Response Team (CVHEART).13 The program is expected to establish a formal structure for regional homelessness policies and programs, identify funding opportunities for future projects, and expand multi -agency cooperation and participation. In addition to its own efforts to end homelessness, the City of La Quinta's membership in CVAG will assure its continued participation in regional efforts. The City's zoning permits emergency shelters by right in all nonresidential districts except Village Commercial. The non-residential zones, including Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial and Regional Commercial, are all located on major arterial roadways, and close to transit stops. This allows for easy access to services and transport. Emergency shelters proposed in an existing building would require no permitting other than building permits for tenant improvements (if any). If an emergency shelter were to be proposed as a new building, it would be subject to approval of a Site Development Permit, which would be approved by either the Director or the Planning Commission (Director approval is allowed for buildings under lo,000 square feet on pads within existing commercial centers). The Site Development Permit consists of a review of site plan and building design to assure compliance with the City's development standards. A Site Development Permit, therefore, does not affect the use proposed, and emergency shelters are permitted by right. The findings for a Site Development Permit require consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; conformance with CEQA; and compatibility of site design, landscaping and architecture to surrounding buildings. The Site Development Permit addresses only zoning standards, and does not address land use. Therefore, the use of the building is not considered, and the permit is based on an analysis of setbacks, building heights and 12 "CV Housing First Program Evaluation: Examining the Clients Served in the First Year: July 2017 to June 2o18," Health Assessment and Research for Communities, September 2o18, page 55• 13 "CV Heart: A Collaborative and Regional Approach to Homelessness in Coachella Valley," Greg Rodriguez, January zozo. 72 416 parking spaces. There are no parking requirements for emergency shelters. Program H-5.4.b. has been added to assure that emergency shelters are added to the parking table, and that parking only be required for employees. There are over 38o acres of vacant commercial land in the City (Land Use Element, Table II-3). Transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic abuse are conditionally permitted in Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zoned districts. One use that may potentially provide housing for those in need of shelter is single room occupancy (SRO) hotels. SRO hotels, as defined in the municipal code, are residential facilities that are rented on a weekly or longer basis that may or may not have private bathroom and kitchen facilities. SRO hotels are conditionally permitted in Regional Commercial zoned districts. 41 Table II-37 Coachella Valley Homeless Shelter Resources Shelter Name Type of Shelter City Clientele or Needs Number Served of Beds Martha's Village and Kitchen Emergency Indio General 120 Shelter From The Storm Emergency Palm Desert Domestic Violence zo County of Riverside, Desert Emergency Cathedral City, General 90 (30 in Healthcare District and (seasonal) Palm Springs, each city) Foundation' Desert Hot Springs Operation Safe House Emergency Thousand Palms Transitional: youth, 20/15 /Transitional young adults Path of Life Ministries Inc. Emergency/ Undisclosed — General 12/2 Rapid Rehousing Coachella Valley Coachella Valley Rescue Emergency/ Indio families with children, 3oo/18 Mission Rapid Rehousing individuals Desert AIDS Project Permanent Palm Springs HIV/AIDS 80 Desert Horizon Permanent Desert Hot Jewish Family 18 Springs Services Desert Vista Permanent Palm Springs Jewish Family 40 Services Desert Vista Permanent Permanent Palm Springs Disabled Men and 35 Supportive Housing Expansion Women (new in 2o18) Riverside University Health Permanent Cathedral City Behavioral Health 25 System — Behavioral Health Episcopal Community Services Permanent Scattered Site — Persons With 40 Coachella Valley Disabilities and Chronically Homeless Shelter Plus Care TBRA Permanent Indio Persons With 23 Disabilities/ Mentally III Source: "The Path Forward: Recommendations to Advance an End to Homelessness in the Coachella Valley," Barbara Poppe and Associates, November 27, 2o18, Appendix 3. ' dhcd.org. FAIR HOUSING The California Fair Employment and Housing Act generally prohibits housing discrimination with respect to race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, genetic information, or veteran or military status. AB 686 requires that all housing elements due on or after January 1, 2021, must contain an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule of July 16, 2015. 74 418 Understate law, AFFH means "taking meaningful actions, in addition to combatting discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics." The City has completed the following: 1. Include a Program that Affirmatively Furthers Fair Housing and Promotes Housing Opportunities throughout the Community for Protected Classes (applies to housing elements beginning January 1, 2019). 2. Conduct an Assessment of Fair Housing, which includes summary of fair housing issues, an analysis of available federal, state, and local data and local knowledge to identify fair housing issues, and an assessment of the contributing factors to the fair housing issues. 3. Prepare the Housing Element Land Inventory and Identification of Sites through the lens of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. To comply with AB 686, the City has completed the following outreach and analysis. Outreach As discussed in the Public Participation section of this Housing Element, the City focused its outreach efforts on community and stakeholder workshops, study sessions, information disseminated through the City's website, electronic mail notifications, and public hearings. The community and stakeholder workshops consisted of a Planning Commission presentation (December 8, 2020), a City Council update (December 15, 2020), a Housing Commission presentation (January 12, 2021) a Joint Planning Commission and City Council Study Session presentation (August 3, 2021) and a public workshop (January 13, 2021) attended by more than 15 community members. The City received a variety of comments at these workshops, including: ❖ Concerns about how to address overpayment by both owners and renters. ❖ Concerns regarding whether short term vacation rentals are impacting the availability of housing for permanent residents. ❖ Assuring that land inventory sites are provided for all types of housing. 41 ❖ The difficulty of financing new projects, which now require two or three times as many funding sources as in the past. ❖ Assuring that development standards, fees and processing times reflect the needs of affordable housing projects. Workshop invitations were sent to local and regional development entities, advocacy groups, and interested parties via email. In addition, workshops were advertised on the City's website, social media, and in email blasts to the City's extensive resident email list. Once certified by HCD, the Housing Element Update will be presented in public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council, with the documents available for public review at City Hall and on the City's website. Assessment of Fair Housing California Government Code Section 65583 (lo)(A)(ii) requires the City of La Quinta to analyze areas of segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. The 2021 California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) Opportunity Areas rate resource levels based on access to effective educational opportunities for both children and adults, concentration of poverty, environmental pollution, and employment levels and proximity to jobs, among others. High and highest resource areas are those with high index scores for a variety of educational, environmental, and economic indicators. Moderate resource areas have access to many of the same resources as high and highest resource areas but may have fewer educational opportunities, lower median home values, longer commutes to places of employment, or other factors that lower their indices for educational, environmental, and economic indicators. As shown in Exhibit II-14 TCAC Opportunity Areas, the majority of the urban area in the City is considered "High Resource". Portions along the northern and western boundaries are considered "Highest Resource", and one area on the eastern boundary adjacent to the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County is considered "Moderate Resource". The southern end of the City is considered "High Segregation & Poverty". Areas of high segregation and poverty are those that have an overrepresentation of people of color compared to the County, and at least 30% of the population in these areas is below the federal poverty line ($26,5oo annually for a family of four in 2021). Within the City and surrounding jurisdictions, TCAC and HCD designated portions of the City of Indio as "Low Resource," which have the most limited access to all resources. 76 420 J] City Boundaries 5oumc Housing and Communky aeMopment, xvro r IN City of to Quinta General Plan L A TERRA NOVAS Tcac 0ppartun1ty Areas L� Quinta, California fthihit I L-14 4�21 Integration and Segregation Patterns To assess patterns of segregation and integration, the City analyzed four characteristics: race and ethnicity, income, disability, and familial status. Race and Ethnicity The diversity index was used to compare the racial and ethnic diversity within the City and surrounding communities. Diversity Index ratings range from o to loo, where higher numbers indicate higher diversity among the measured groups. As shown in Exhibit II-15 Diversity Index, the City exhibits a range of diversity ratings. The Cove and Village area, the southern end of the City, the area just north of Highway ill, and an area on the eastern boundary adjacent to the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County have relatively high diversity (7o-85). Portions of the northwestern and southeastern City have lower diversity (below 4o). The remaining areas are rated mid -range (40-70) on TCAC's diversity index. The surrounding areas have comparable diversity ratings as La Quinta, though areas of higher diversity are found in City of Indio to the east. According to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey, over half (57.3%) of La Quinta residents identify as White, non -Hispanic, whereas over half (64.2%) of the Indio residents to the east identify as Hispanic. The City of La Quinta can be viewed as a demographic transition point from the west to east Coachella Valley, with the proportion of White, non -Hispanic population between those in Indio (34.7%) to the east and Bermuda Dunes (58.5%) to the north, Palm Desert (66%) and Indian Wells (88.1%) to the west. The southern end of the City falls in part of a larger area designated a TCAC Area of High Segregation and Poverty in zozo and 2021, and is also in Tract 456.05, which is designated a racially or ethnically concentrated area of poverty (R/ECAP) by HUD (2009-2013) (Exhibit II-17). However, these designations are most likely not true for this part of the City due to data granularity reasons, as analyzed in detail below. This area, as part of Census Tract 456.05, is in a Hispanic Majority Tract with a predominant gap >5o% between Hispanic and other race/ethnicity groups (Exhibit II-16). More urban areas in the City fall in White Majority Tracts (predominant gap >50%). Similarly, much of the lower diversity areas in the Cities of Indian Wells and Palm Desert are also in White Majority Tracts. 78 422 Source: Housing and CoMmunity De"IQPFnen#, 202, r I City of La Quinta General Plan rL A TERRA NOVAl Diversity Index ....w• nae+•w —. La Cluinta, California ExhiO C II-15 CMI 5aa,rce: Housdng AM Community Development, 201, r-i L -4TERRA NOVA` ft".4LgMIA>. MC City of La Quinta General Plan WhIte(Hispanic Maicrity Tracts La Qufnw, California Predominant Population Hispanic Majority Tracts slim ;gap { 10%) Sizeable (gap 10% — 50% t Priodominant {gap> 50%) White Majority Tracts Slim Jgap < 10%) Sizeable (gap 10% - SO'ro) Predominant (gap> 50%) r---- I Exl5lbil II-i5 424 A close examination of the HCD AFFH maps and the R/ECAP area in La Quinta reveals that the designation is least likely due to demographics within the area, but rather its location in Census Tract 456.05, which spans a large area of unincorporated Riverside County in the east Coachella Valley. As shown in Exhibits II-16 and II-17, from a data granularity perspective, the R/ECAP and Hispanic Majority Tract designations cover the entire Tract 456.05 and do not tell any difference within the tract. Similarly, the Area of High Segregation and Poverty (202o and 2021) designations are specific to Block Group 4 under Tract 456.05 which covers more unincorporated Riverside County area than La Quinta City area (see Exhibit II-2ob). The area in La Quinta under R/ECAP designation is roughly bounded by Avenue 6o on the north, and consists of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community. Based on local knowledge and property values at Coral Mountain and Trilogy, this area of the City is not an area with concentrated poverty. This area will be further analyzed in Income subsection below for any potential for segregation and concentration of poverty. HCD has not published the adjusted Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA) methodology for California as of August 2021. While no data has been released on RCAA, the national metric may be referenced for general considerations here: RCAA is defined as census tracts where 1) 8o% or more of the population is white, and 2) the median household income is $125,000 or greater (slightly more than double the national the median household income in 2o16). As shown in Exhibit II-18, Census Tract 456.o8 along the eastern City boundary (roughly between Avenue 54 and Avenue 6o) has a median income greater than $125,000. Census data reveals that this tract has 89.6% white population that is not Hispanic. The area may have the potential to be a RCAA. While another area to the north also has a median income greater than $125,000, it is in a tract with fewer than 8o% white, non - Hispanic population and may not qualify as a RCAA. While introducing various housing choices may alleviate the potential RCAA situation in these areas, they are mostly built out with retirement communities and offer very limited opportunities for education, employment, services/amenities, and transit. Therefore, the City has prioritized providing more affordable housing in areas that offer ample opportunities to meet the needs of lower -income households. Income The City also assessed the concentrations of households below the poverty line across the City to analyze access to adequate housing and jobs. As shown in Exhibits II-18 and II-19, the bulk of the City has a very low percentage of residents (less than to%) who fall below the poverty 81 425 line ($26,500 for a family of four in 2021), and the central and northern portions of the City as well as the southern Cove area have a low percentage (10%-20%) of residents below the poverty line. Note that the southern end of City, as part of Tract 456.05 that is designated as R/ECAP, shows a higher percentage (38.2%) of residents below the poverty line, but this percentage represents the entire tract rather than just the portion in La Quinta. 82 426 i F rr J - x"r i Op 4F �= Cathedral' city d 2. RanOa Mlirage palm Desert Pam r Indio.4 ring Indian Weiss ,, '� « India k L . CDarheliA. y La Quince. f / Coachella • -------------- �. e J dr- { or ROECAP and Areas of High Segregalion and Poverty TCAG Are it of x•gri 5eyretplion and Povrrty 2020 (Black GrauPF Rar.ially ae Ethnicalry Concrntraled Areas ni Pow orly IRFECAP%) - (Htffl, 2009 • 3013) a - Mel a AIECAP I-R'ECAPArea QOK MQLk16 4-,Ew.,66m.gLWArL 0 Crry Qoun�aries � � Source- Housing and rammunity Nvelcipmentir zo*1 4 IF, 14 City of La Qu1nta General Pion L J TERRA NOW RfECAP and Areas of HTgh Segregation and Poverty 11.17 La Quanta, California Source-, Housmg and Community Development, 2021 TERRA NOVA' City of La Qulnta General flan median Income Lo Quiytta, California Median Income 2015-2019 { $3v,09fl 555.00D c $87.100 ("CID 2020 Stare Median Income; < 3125,un0 = Greater than 5125,000 Q City Mun(!Rries Gxtiibi7 ii-1a 84 428 6 Desert Hot Sprrrig s Cathedr City govorty stalus 701"419 Percent of Population whose annual income is below poverty level C tl}°fa 1d°iY - 20% 20°r6 - 30% Illllllli 30% - 40% 7 401V. 0 City Boundarje!5 Thousand Palms Rancho Mirage I Palm Desert Indian Wells o I C aac h+.,l I.1 L,L Quinta1 Onto Mdefrlfarr?S ifiifrtter;l Source: Housing and Community 08v1o5pment, aam r- -I Clip of La Quiwi l General Plan L J TERRA NOVA Poverty Status w+w%QL KSL WN ■c La quints, California 8 The poverty status trend saw some minor changes from 2014 to 2019. The percentage of residents who fall below the poverty line in the northern Cove and Village area and an area on the eastern City boundary (north of Avenue 54) have lowered over time from 10-20% to below to%, while the percentage in the northern City increased from below lo% to 10-2o%. The southern end of City as part of Tract 456.05, showed 42% of residents below the poverty line in 2014, though this percentage captures the entire tract and does not specifically indicate any change within the La Quinta area. The HUD Low to Moderate Income Population maps at Tract and Block Group levels (Exhibit II-zoa and b) illuminate how data granularity affects interpretation. The map in Exhibit II-zoa at tract level is less detailed/refined, showing the percentage of low to moderate income population for entire census tracts; in contrast, the map in Exhibit II-zob has a finer resolution at block group level, showing the percentages for each block group, which is a smaller geographical unit than the census tract. Census Tract 456.05 consists of a portion of City of La Quinta which includes vacant land, a private golf club and a private retirement community, and rural agricultural communities in unincorporated Riverside County. The southern end of La Quinta is part of Block Group 4 of Census Tract 456.05. Block Group 4 shows 42% of low -moderate income (LMI) population, whereas Tract 456.05 shows 79% of LMI population. This gap in percentage of LMI population can be attributed to the demographical difference between the La Quinta portion and the remaining unincorporated County area. The larger unincorporated County area skews the percentage of LM I population to the higher side. This phenomenon also occurs in the Predominant Population map (Exhibit 11-16), which shows the entire Census Tract 456.05, including the southern La Quinta area, as a Hispanic Majority Tract with a predominant gap >5o% between Hispanic and other race/ethnicity groups. This contradicts local demographic knowledge of this area, as there is no evidence showing a significantly higher ratio of Hispanic population than surrounding areas in the City. In summary, while currently available data are not specific to the southern end of the City of La Quinta and are inconclusive on the area's potential for segregation and concentration of poverty, based on local knowledge and judgment, the area in southern La Quinta is least likely to experience segregation based on race/ethnicity or low income, or qualify as an Area of High Segregation and Poverty or R/ECAP. As shown in Table 11-16 of this Housing Element, the City of La Quinta has a vacancy rate of 7.4% for rental units and 5.0% for ownership units. 86 430 Correcting for seasonal or recreational units, which are considered vacant by the Census but are not available or used for permanent occupancy, the overall vacancy rate is 6.5%. These vacancy rates are quite low and may indicate limited room for mobility and high demand for affordable units. 431 Source: Housing and Community oevelopmcrit, xoai r, 1 L J TERRA IVQVX ,'•Y1aM9EAILi Ilrt — City of La Quirnta General Plan G:AM fxMWt Low to Made rate Income Poptclatien by Census Tract • 11-2aa La Quinta, California ■ 88 432 Source: 4casfng and Community Development, Zuni r i City of La gUinta General Plan L -A TERRA NOVX Low to Moderate income Population by Cenws Tract H,W-0-AESS- - LaquintarCalifornia Eihabit � it-aob 3� Disability According to the 2015-2019 ACS, the City of La Quinta has a low percentage of population with a disability, with the majority of areas in the City being 10%-2o% and some areas being below to%. Compared to the 2010-2014 ACS, the northern Cove and Village area now have a lower percentage (<lo%) than in 2014 (10%-20%). Small portions on the northern City boundary show a higher percentage of population with a disability (10%-20%) compared to 2014 (<lo%), though such data represent the entire Tract 452.14 which also covers part of Bermuda Dunes. Given the overall low percentages of population with a disability and limited space/time variation in the City of La Quinta, the population with a disability appears to be integrated in all communities such that they have equal access to all housing and economic opportunities. The City has a no -fee application process for reasonable accommodation, and assisted more than double the disabled residents between 2014 and 2020 (from 91 to 188 residents) in Housing Authority owned properties. The City's Municipal Code Section 9.60.32o establishes a procedure for reasonable accommodation application, review and appeal processes, during which the City shall provide assistance to ensure an accessible process. The City will continue to refer lower income households to Riverside County for home repair grants, which can provide up to $6,000 for repairs including a handicapped ramp (Program H-4.4.0. Familial Status The 2015-2019 ACS reveals that the City of La Quinta has relatively few single -person households («0% in most areas) and a higher percentage of couple households (>4o% except in the mid -Cove area and a small area in the southeast corner). The percentage of children in married -couple households is at least 40% throughout the City except for a small area in the northeast corner. The mid -Cove area, the area south of Highway ill, and the southern end of City see slightly higher percentage of children in female -headed single -parent households (20%-4o%). Note that data for the southern end of City may not be representative as it is based on the entire tract which may have different demographics than the City area. The household makeup of the City suggests there is likely demand for units with at least two bedrooms for family and non -family households. Assessment and Actions Given the factors discussed above, there is no evidence of segregation based on disability in the City, but there is potential for segregation based on income and opportunity to improve racial integration within La Quinta. As shown in Exhibits II-18 and II-19, the concentrations of lower income households are not limited to La Quinta. The City of Indio 90 434 to the east has an areas with over 40% population living below the poverty line, which is more concentrated than all surrounding areas. Areas with 30%-40% population living below the poverty line are seen in the cities of Cathedral City, Palm Springs and Desert Hot Springs to the west, and the City of Coachella to the east, as well as unincorporated Riverside County areas. With a median income higher than the state level in 2019 ($77,839 in La Quinta; $75,235 in California, 2015-2019 ACS), the City is not considered disadvantaged economically (median income is 8o% or less than the statewide average), although certain areas in/around the Cove and Village area and south of the Highway ill are below the threshold. Concentrations of households with similar incomes may indicate a uniform development pattern and need for more varied housing stock. If availability and distribution of affordable housing are improved, it will encourage a more economically diverse community. As shown in Exhibit II-21, Job Proximity Index, the majority of the City is rated with medium proximity to employment opportunities (Jobs Proximity Index between 4o and 80). One area along the eastern City boundary north of the Highway ill and the bottom of the Cove area have lower Jobs Proximity Index scores of 19-35. Two areas in the western City have high Jobs Proximity Index scores (>80). In contrast to the TCAC Opportunity Areas (Exhibit II-14), this suggests that access to jobs is not the single driver behind the concentration of lower income households, but rather the type of jobs and housing available and other socioeconomic factors. The City completed the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan and EIR in 2017. The Village area is generally located north and south of Calle Tampico, east of Eisenhower Drive and west of Washington Street, and north of Avenue 52. Projects in the Village area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Municipal Code Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre. The mixed use overlay was introduced in 20l6 to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. Per Section 9.140.o9o.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. The City also amended and completed Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) regulations in ordinances passed in 2016 and 2019. The City intends to apply the Affordable Housing Overlay to all sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Program i.i.b.), including sites in the Village area and along the Highway ill corridor. These measures are expected to expand housing options and foster a more economically diverse community. 435 The City was awarded an Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Grant for "La Quinta Village Complete Streets - A Road Diet Project" in the amount of 17,313,000. This project included the construction of five new roundabouts in the La Quinta Village where pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart, and automobile traffic exist. The new roundabouts will help accommodate non -vehicular traffic, making roadways safer and more accessible to pedestrians and bicycles in the La Quinta Village. The project also reduced four traffic lanes to two lanes along Calle Tampico and Calle Sinaloa from Eisenhower to Desert Club Drive, and along Eisenhower from Calle Tampico to Calle Sinaloa. This area will be used as space for designated bike and golf cart lanes. The reduced lanes and crosswalks added midblock will provide pedestrians with safer access to Civic Center Park, Old Town La Quinta, and the Benjamin Franklin Elementary School. The City recognized the impacts on small businesses due to the COVID- 19 pandemic, and established a $1.5 million COVID-19 Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Program. The Program helps provide small businesses with emergency cash flow in the form of zero percent interest loans of $5,000 to $zo,000, and up to $500,00o exclusively for restaurants that were open for pickup and delivery orders in the City. La Quinta residents had access to rental assistance through United Lift, a rental assistance program coordinated between Riverside County, United Way of the Inland Valleys, and Lift To Rise. The program goal was to keep lo,000 families and residents housed. The program provided $33 million in rental assistance between June and November 2020. Eligible recipients were renters in Riverside County with a current lease agreement who are either individuals or families earning 8o percent or below of the area's median income, or who can document a loss of income due to COVID-19 economic impacts, leaving them unable to make their rent. 92 436 i$rI Indian Wells .:Ift pa,?— - LA QwWa i111dre Jobs Proximity Index 2414-2017 ego (Furtbast Piroxlmlty) r-- 20 - 4Q 40 - SD Bn -aa - < $U (CIOseSl Pea ximPly) Santa Ron.i S.rr 1.i.:ui!a Ma+i-urns City Boundaries Nin wirw i}i]/7if7r1Di77 SWrW Housing and Community Wrwe lapment, 2021 F, 19 City of La Quints Ge"rai Plan 14 TERRA OVA Jobs ProxPrnity index .-F-. iL.II-in -.v La Quirnar Cal If orWhi 39 Coachella 1� N L rw a r L�I�i � Ij-zt LOW FRA Access to Opportunity The City reviewed TCAC Opportunity Areas identified in Exhibit 11-14, and identified one inaccurate designation: the southern end of the City is categorized as "High Segregation & Poverty" by TCAC/HCD, which includes vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community. As discussed above, this portion of the City falls in census tracts (456.05 and 456.09) that consist of primarily agricultural/rural communities in the unincorporated Riverside County, and the census -tract -based designations and data do not accurately reflect the portion in La Quinta. This area has large vacant parcels with potential for housing development, and is zoned for commercial and residential developments at various densities. In addition to the Composite Score of TCAC Opportunity Areas shown in Exhibit II-14, the City also analyzed individual scores for economic, education and environmental domains. Most of the City scores in the highest range (>0.75) which indicates more positive economic outcome. The southern end of City, lower Cove area, and a portion just north of Highway ill score slightly lower (0.50-0.75) in the economic domain. The upper Cove, Village and area just north, as well as small areas along the eastern City boundary score lower (0.25-0.50), which indicates relatively less positive economic outcome. Areas identified with less positive economic outcome are found in the adjacent cities of Indio, Indian Wells, Palm Desert and census designated place of Bermuda Dunes. Areas identified with less positive economic outcome (<0.25) are seen in the cities of Indio, Coachella and unincorporated communities in the eastern valley. The area north of Highway ill scores in the highest range (>0.75) which indicates more positive education outcomes, and the west side of the City scores slightly lower (0.50-0.75). The eastern City is identified with less positive education outcomes (<0.25), which is also seen in portions of the cities of Indio and Coachella, as well as the unincorporated eastern Coachella Valley. There is no data on environmental domain for the Cove area and an area in the eastern City roughly between Avenue 54 and Avenue 60. Most of the City falls in the highest score range (0.75-1) which indicates more positive environmental outcomes. The southern end of City (in Census Tracts 456.05 and 456.09) is identified with less positive environmental outcomes (<0.25). Similar to other HCD data, the environmental domain score is also based on census tracts and may not represent the City portion accurately. The eastern Coachella Valley in general, except portions of the cities of Indio and Coachella, is identified with less positive environmental outcomes (<0.25). 94 438 The Cove area is surrounded by the Santa Rosa Mountains on three sides, and the only access to the local and regional roadway network is on the north. This topographical constraint results in further proximity to jobs the further down the Cove the area is, (Job Proximity Index score decreases from 40-6o to <20). The east side of the City generally has medium proximity to jobs (Job Proximity Index score between 40-60). As noted, the City encourages mixed -use development in the Village area, which is directly north of the Cove, in the La Quinta Village Build - Out Plan adopted in 2017. Future development and redevelopment in the Village will improve job proximity in the Cove area. Comparing Exhibit II-21, Jobs Proximity Index to Exhibits II-18 through II-2o reveals that concentration of lower income households is not directly related to job proximity. These findings confirm the following trends: 1. Jobs that are near housing may not meet the needs of the residents located there, creating a jobs/housing imbalance and lower job proximity. 2. Someone may be able to both work and live in an area with a high concentration of jobs; however, they may still only be able to access positions with low wages and find it hard to afford housing costs. Existing affordable housing projects in the City of La Quinta range from apartments to single-family homes. According to the City's AB 987 database, as of July 8, 2020, there are 40o affordable single-family ownership units with two to five bedrooms. These units are dispersed in various neighborhoods in the western, central and northern City. The eastern and southern City consists primarily of private resorts and golf clubs. There are 28 affordable single-family rental units as of July 8, zozo, all of which have three bedrooms. These units are located in and around the Cove area. Additionally, there are nine affordable multi -family housing complexes offering a total of 912 affordable multi -family rental units,14 including HUD apartments, Section 8 apartments, public housing apartments, non-profit senior and family low-income apartments, and Low-income tax credit apartments (LIHTC).'S Villa Cortina Apartments provides 116 moderate income restricted rentals. Seasons At La Quinta is a Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment and provides 87 extremely low, low, and moderate 14 Affordable Housing Program, Single -Family Rental Units and Multi -Family Rental Units, City of La Quinta, updated July 8, zozo. 'S LowlncomeHousing.us, accessed June 1, zozo. E Rue income apartments for seniors only. These two projects are located adjacent to the Village area near Calle Tampico & Washington Street. Residents have walking access to the various retail, dining and services in the Village area, as well as La Quinta Library, Civic Center Park and La Quinta Museum. The DSUSD Adams State Pre -School and John Adams Elementary School are located to the west within walking distance, and Benjamin Franklin Elementary School is located approximately 1/3-mile away to the west. Bus stops at Calle Tampico & Washington Street are served by SunLine Transit Agency's Route 7. There are five affordable housing projects south of Highway 111 between Washington Street and Jefferson Street. Hadley Villas (79 extremely low to low income one -bedroom villas) and Seasons At Miraflores La Quinta (116 extremely low and very low income one- to two -bedroom apartments) are dedicated to seniors. Aventine Apartments (zo low and moderate income units), Wolff Waters Place (216 green -built one- to four- bedroom apartments for extremely low to moderate income households), and Coral Mountain Apartments (174 low and moderate income units) are open to all ages. These projects have close proximity to various retail, grocery, dining and services in the Highway 111 corridor, which also offers ample employment opportunities with a variety of commercial developments. La Quinta Park and La Quinta High School are located north of Highway 111 on the other side of Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. Amelia Earhart Elementary School and John Glenn Middle School are located approximately 1.2 miles to the north. The area is well served by Bus Routes 1,1X and 7 and bus stops are within walking distance of these communities. In the northern City, Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes provides 8o one- to three -bedroom apartment units affordable to extremely low to low income households. A LEED Platinum certified community, the project provides a swimming pool, playground, basketball court, and large community multipurpose room. Pioneer Park (with a dog park) and Desert Pride Park are located across Miles Avenue to the south. There are two day care centers across Adams Street to the east. Amelia Earhart Elementary School and John Glenn Middle School are located approximately 2/3-mile to the east, and La Quinta High School at similar distance to the southeast. The project is less than a mile north of the Highway 111 corridor. The project is served by SunLine Bus Route 7 with stops at Miles Avenue & Adams Street. Washington Street Apartments is located in the northwestern corner of the City and provides 140 units for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income seniors. The City of Palm Desert Joe Mann Park is 96 440 within walking distance to the northwest, as well as neighborhood serving plazas at Washington Street & Hovley Lane. The project is served by SunLine Bus Route 7 with stops just north on Washington Street. Within a half -mile radius of the project, James Monroe Elementary School is located to the northeast, Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School and Horizon School to the south, Montessori School of the Valley campuses to the west. None of the currently affordable single-family rental units are at risk of losing affordability restrictions during or within to years of the planning period. Some of the single-family ownership units are at risk of losing affordability restrictions during the next planning period, and monitors sales to encourage preservation of these units. As shown in Table II-52, there are no rental units at risk of conversion during the planning period. In addition to planned and pending affordable housing projects described in the Land Inventory (Tables III-47 & III-48) of this Housing Element, the City will establish a program to encourage accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and Junior ADUs as described in Program H-2.1.a and assess their effectiveness in expanding housing choices in the highest resource areas. Disproportionate Housing Need and Displacement Risk The AFFH Guidance for All Public Entities and for Housing Elements (April 2021 Update) defines `disproportionate housing needs' as `a condition in which there are significant disparities in the proportion of members of a protected class experiencing a category of housing need when compared to the proportion of members of any other relevant groups, or the total population experiencing that category of housing need in the applicable geographic area.' Disproportionate housing needs may include things like overcrowding, overpayment, housing conditions disproportionately affecting protected classes, including displacement risk. Overcrowding As discussed under Housing Needs (Table II-27), overcrowding is not a significant issue in the City of La Quinta. As of the 2014-2018 ACS, 3.7% of all occupied units in the City are considered overcrowded, which include primarily renter units (82.7%, 477 units) rather than owner units (17.3%, ioo units). io.9% of all renter households experience overcrowding. The overall overcrowding rate (3.7%) in La Quinta has increased from 2.3% in 2014; specifically, overcrowding has improved slightly for owners but worsened for renters. Compared to an overcrowding rate of 6.9% in the Riverside County (2018), overcrowding in La Quinta is less significant. 4941 The renter overcrowding rate (10.9%) is only slightly lower than that of the County (11.8%). Households with lower incomes may permit overcrowding to derive additional income, or there may be insufficient supply of housing units in the City to accommodate the demand, especially rental units. Unit size and affordability can be key contributors to overcrowding, and the City may need more affordable rental units of various sizes to meet the need of the community. Homelessness In 2020, there were 3 unsheltered homeless persons in La Quinta according to the PIT Count for Riverside County. The City allows homeless shelters in the Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zones with a conditional use permit. Single -room occupancy units are also conditionally allowed in the Regional Commercial zone in the City. Program H-5.4.a and H-5.4.b commit the City to bring its Zoning Ordinance in compliance with AB 101 for Low Barrier Navigation Center requirements on homeless shelters, and with state law for emergency shelters, transitional and supportive housing. Overpayment The median rent in La Quinta can be out of reach for lower income households with two or more persons; however, as shown in Exhibit II- 22, La Quinta has less prevalent overpayment by renters (<6o% of renter households City-wide) in 2019 compared to surrounding jurisdictions, which have areas with over 6o% of renter households overpaying. Overpayment is considered a chronic issue that needs to be addressed both locally and regionally. As is shown in Table II-25 (Overpayment by Income Category and Tenure), as of the 2012-2016 CHAS, between both renters and owners, 71.4% of lower income households in La Quinta pay at least 30% of their income toward housing costs. Regionally, overpayment among renters is especially prevalent (>8o%) in the north side of the City of Palm Springs, south side of Desert Hot Springs, and adjacent unincorporated areas of Riverside County as well as the south side of the City of Coachella. The overpaying rate more than doubles for lower -income owners (76.2 percent) than that of all owner households (36.5%). Overpayment increases the risk of displacement for residents who are no longer able to afford their housing costs. Geographically speaking, overpayment among homeowners is more prevalent than among renters in the City of La Quinta, although the reverse is true for the region. As shown in Exhibit II-23, most of La Quinta has a homeowner overpayment rate between 4o%-6o%, and the area north of Highway 111 has a lower overpayment rate below 4o%. Regionally, overpayment among 98 442 homeowners is below 8o% except a small area in the City of Coachella, and areas with between 6o%-8o% homeowner overpayment are found in the cities of Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, Palm Springs, Desert Hot Springs and the adjacent unincorporate Riverside County area as well as the City of Coachella. The City has included Programs H-1.1.a, H-2.1.b, H- 2.3.b to incentivize development of affordable housing and has included an action in Program H-5.2.a to connect minority populations to lending programs for homeownership. I IM - Qverpaymeat by Renters 2015.2019 Ic 201/0 SI]rlf1S�5 �Y City boundaries Palirt Swm4s Calhedra City Thousand Palms Rancho Mirage I Pant} Desert Irsdici Indtatit VS+clls 9�tdt� Cane La Cluinta ,SdrrFa Rosa Sara Javnro MounfawS Nahonal Munument Source_ Housing and Community Revelnpment,?Wi pr 14 City of La qulnta General Plan L -A TMRA NOV9 Overpayment by Renters =pax La quirtta, California Ilk a Exhi\bit 1 II�z� 100 444 No,'ronji Anon{ rMtloi 5nurcr. Muting and [community iie,qP:ioprnem, zo3t r -I L i TERRA NOVA City of La Quints Conerai Plan Overpayment by Owners La Quinta, CaOfornia Overpayment by Home Owners 2445-DI9 < 20% '7flo�_ _ AA61_ 101 445 Substandard Housing Conditions In La Quinta, less than a third (28.6%) of the housing stock is older than 30 years, and less than 5% is over 50 years old. Older homes are typically found in the Cove area. After 30 years homes generally require major rehabilitation, such as a new roof or updated plumbing. As discussed earlier, a 2007 City-wide housing conditions survey found that the majority of 59 units in need of minor or moderate rehabilitation were in the Cove area. The Code Compliance staff track property maintenance and planned for a housing conditions survey in fiscal year 2021/2022. The repair costs can be prohibitive such that the owner or renter live in unhealthy, substandard housing conditions or the renter is displaced if the house is designated as uninhabitable and the owner does not complete repairs. To prevent these situations, the City offers programs that assist homeowners and apartment complex owners with home maintenance and repair costs. Homeowners interested in reducing their utility bills through upgrades now have an alternative to tapping their mortgage for home equity loans. Through partnership with the City of La Quinta, HERO and Ygrene offer a wide array of home energy products at low -fixed interest rates with flexible payment terms of up to 20 years (see Programs H-4.4.a through H-4.4.d). Mortgage Loan Indicators Data related to home loan applications is made available annually through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, through the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). The data is organized by census tracts rather than local jurisdictions, and thus the following analysis is based on census tracts located entirely within the City of La Quinta (451.09, 451.10, 451.20, 451.2116, and 456.08). Among first mortgage loan applications originated in La Quinta in 2020, 74.3% were made to white applicants. For 19.9% of loans issued, race data was not available. Among first mortgage loan applications originated in La Quinta in 2020, Asian (39, 1.8%), Black or African American (30, 1.4%), American Indian or Alaska Native (6, 0.3%) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (5, 0.2%) homebuyers received a small percentage of total mortgage loans. The percentages of originated loans for white, Asian and Black or African American groups are lower than the corresponding race distribution of La Quinta. Considering the 19.9% of loans with unavailable data on race and geographical area covered in the analysis, the pattern is largely consistent with the City-wide race distribution. HMDA data combines data on Hispanic or Latino identity within other race categories; approximately 10.3% (224) of 2,181 originated loan i6 The northeast corner of Tract 451.21 is located in City of Indio, which consists of a gas station and convenience store. These commercial properties do not affect home mortgage data. 102 446 applications went to borrowers identifying as Hispanic or Latino. The majority (239, 68.5%) of the 349 first mortgage loan applications that were denied were denied to white applicants (including 3o borrowers that also identified as Hispanic or Latino). Nine (2.6%) applications were denied to Asian borrowers, five (1.4%) were denied to borrowers identified as Black or African American, three (0.9%) were denied to borrowers identified as American Indian or Alaska Native and one (0.3%) were denied to Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander borrowers. For 82, or 23.5% of denied loan applications, race data was not available. The racial distribution in denied applications are roughly proportional to that in originated loan applications, except for the variations in American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander groups due to small numbers of applications. Therefore, the denied loan distribution is considered largely consistent with the City-wide race distribution. In 2019, the origination rate to white applicants was higher than in zozo, with 77.1% of the 1,222 first mortgage loans originated for home purchases going to white residents. Black (1.6%, or 20 loans) residents had a marginally higher share of loans originated in 2019 as compared to zozo, while Asian (1.1%, or 14 loans) had a somewhat lower share of loans originated in 2019 as compared to zozo. The origination rates for American Indian or Alaska Native (0.2%, or z loans) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (o.1%, or 1 loan) groups in 2019 were marginally lower than in zozo. Race data was not available for 17.9% of first mortgage loans originated. Of the 262 first mortgage loans that were denied in 2019, 74.0% were denied to white applicants (194 loans, including 26 borrowers that also identified as Hispanic or Latino). Seven (2.7%) applications were denied to Asian borrowers, three (1.1%) were denied to borrowers identified as Black or African American. Approximately l0.6% of loans originated and 11.8% of loans denied were for applicants who identify as Hispanic or Latino, though these loans are also counted within other race categories. As described in Policies H-1.4 and H-5.5, the City will strive to ensure equal access to lending programs for people in all segments of the population and prevent any discriminatory practices based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability. 104 % :; Sensitive Communities ie Vulnerable City Boundaries 7, dr A .116 !Z� .6. PaliI 1A awl, 54Lj rce Hou ring an d iLQ rnmunity DEvelopmentd F 14 City rrt La quirita General Plan i, -ATERRA NOVA: Sensitive Communities -urban Displacement Project ..r"c L2 (bjinta, Cal Ifa rn is I 104 448 Displacement Risk The Urban Displacement Project (UDP) is a research and action initiative of the University of California Berkeley and the University of Toronto. UDP conducts community -centered, data -driven, applied research toward more equitable and inclusive futures for cities, and contributed the Sensitive Communities map to HCD's AFFH Data Viewer. Communities are designated sensitive if "they currently have populations vulnerable to displacement in the event of increased redevelopment and drastic shifts in housing cost." The following characteristics define vulnerability: • Share of very low-income residents is above zo%; and • The tract meets two of the following criteria: o Share of renters is above 40%, o Share of people of color is above 50%, o Share of very low-income households (5o% AM I or below) that are severely rent burdened households is above the county median, o They or areas in close proximity have been experiencing displacement pressures (percent change in rent above County median for rent increases), or o Difference between tract median rent and median rent for surrounding tracts above median for all tracts in county (rent gap). The Sensitive Communities - Urban Displacement Project map (Exhibit II-24) shows that two areas in the City are designated as vulnerable: the northern Cove area (Tract 451.2o) and a small area in southeastern City (part of Tract 456.og). Tract 451.2o has 25%-50% low to moderate income (LMI) population (Exhibit II-zoa), but the Village area (Block Group 3 in Tract 451.2o) has 50%-75% LMI population, higher than the average tract (Exhibit II-zob). Sites z & 3 in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II-5o) are located within Block Group 3 of Tract 451.20 which will increase affordable housing supply in this area and help alleviate displacement risks for lower income households. The entire Tract 456.og is designated as vulnerable, which spans large areas in the City of Coachella and unincorporated County and only a tiny portion in the City of La Quinta. As shown in Exhibit II-24, the portion within La Quinta consists of vacant land only, and is thus not considered a sensitive community nor subject to displacement. 10 Enforcement and Outreach Capacity The City enforces fair housing through periodical reviews of its policies and code for compliance with State law and investigation of fair housing complaints. The City of La Quinta regularly updates their policies and codes to reflect changes in State law. The City is set to meet housing element deadlines through efforts from both staff and consultants. The City will prioritize programs with action items on zoning code updates to facilitate housing. The City has included an action in Program H-2.2.a to update its Zoning Ordinance on density bonus provisions according to AB 2345• Program H-2.3.b requires the City to develop incentives for inclusion of affordable housing units in mixed use projects in the Highway 111 corridor. Other programs include assessing affordability of accessory dwelling units (H-2.1.a) and updating homeless shelter provisions to comply with AB 101 (Low -Barrier Navigation Centers) (H- 5.4•a). These changes will be completed at regular Zoning Ordinance update in 2021-2022. Apart from zoning and development standards, fair housing issues can occur in rental, lending and purchase of housing including discriminatory behaviors by landlords, lenders, and real estate agents. Typical cases range from refusal to grant reasonable accommodation requests or allow service animals to selective showing of property listings based on familial status, sex, religion, or other protected class, and more. The City complies with fair housing law on investigating such complaints by referring discrimination cases to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. (FHCRC), a non-profit organization approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that works with individuals and government agencies to ensure that fair housing laws are upheld. Services include anti -discrimination education and investigation, landlord -tenant dispute mediation, foreclosure prevention, pre -purchase consulting, credit counseling, and training. The City website describes and provides a link to FHCRC. On August 9, 2021, FHCRC provided housing discrimination records in La Quinta during the 2014-2021 planning period. Of the 52 complaint records, physical disability (21, 4o%) and sex (15, 29%) were the two main bases, followed by mental disability (5,10%). Three each were based on national origin and age, two based on familial status, and one each based on race, source of income and arbitrary. The race/ethnicity distribution data shows 40% of the records were filed by persons identified as "White Non Hispanic" and 38% by persons identified as "White & Hispanic". Six records (12%) were filed by persons identified as "Black Non Hispanic", and 5 records (10%) were filed by persons that 1o6 450 "Chose not to respond to race (not Hispanic)". Additional details including case status/outcome were not provided on these records, and thus they are inconclusive to identify any patterns. HUD's Region IX Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) provided case records for La Quinta in July 2021. Five fair housing cases were filed with their office during the previous planning period, two based on disability and retaliation, one each based on disability/race, and the other based on race and retaliation. Three of these cases were closed with conciliation or successful settlement, and two others were closed due to no cause determination. All five cases were handled through the Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP), in which HUD funds state and local agencies that administer fair housing laws that HUD has determined to be substantially equivalent to the Fair Housing Act. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is the only certified agency for FHAP in California. Because state law has additional protected classes than federal law, DFEH may have additional case records. A request was made in July to DFEH, but they were not able to provide data as of August 13, 2021. FHCRC and FHEO were not able to provide specific locational information for cases either because they do not track the geographic origin of complaints or due to confidentiality concerns. However, given the number of FHEO case records and their outcome, the City of La Quinta would have a low potential for any patterns or concentrations of fair housing issues in the City. However, the City continues to work with agencies and local organizations to affirmatively further fair housing through outreach and support and referral for housing discrimination cases (Programs H-1.4-a, H-5.2.b and H-5.2.c). Sites Inventory The City extends into the Santa Rosa Mountains in the west and south, and much of the area in the southwestern City is designated as Open Space - Natural on the General Plan and not available for development. The City is largely built out, and future housing development will occur as mainly inf ill projects and on the south side of the City where there are larger vacant parcels. The City identified sufficient sites to meet the RHNA in La Quinta's sixth cycle inventory (see Exhibit II-25 and Table II- 5o). The vacant land inventory only includes parcels that the City has identified as having the potential to develop during the 2022-2029 planning period. Sites 1-3, 7-9, 11 and 13 are identified for lower income units, Sites to and 12 are identified for moderate income units, and Sites 15 through zo are identified for above moderate income units. 01 As shown in the inventory map (Exhibit II-25), the sites identified for future housing development are located in different parts of the City in various zoning districts and dispersed to the greatest extent possible with available lands, which will encourage a mix of household types across the City. Most of the sites identified for this Housing Element, primarily those located along the Highway ill corridor, which could generate 655 lower income units, and near the Cove area, could result in 36 units in the Village of small -lot development and housing affordable to lower -income households. Above moderate income units will be built in the southern City on larger lots and could generate 456 units. The vacant sites that are zoned suitably for multiple income categories and could generate 182 units are distributed in the central and north sides of the City, which combat potential segregation and concentration of poverty by providing a variety of housing types to meet the needs of residents in these areas. Integration and Segregation: Race and Income Sites in the inventory are dispersed in areas ranging from lowest to highest diversity ratings (Exhibit II-15), although some of the sites south of the Highway ill and near the Cove area are in areas with lower median incomes (<$55,000, see Exhibit I I-18). However, these areas are also High Resource areas due to location within the Highway ill corridor and proximity to the Village area, and could generate 691 lower income units. The vacant land inventory will increase housing supply for lower and moderate income households in the High Resource areas by 1.147 units, and is not expected to exacerbate any existing patterns of segregation based on race and income. The City examined the opportunity area map prepared by HCD and TCAC (Exhibit II-14) and identified inaccurate designations for the southern end of the City. The area is generally bounded by Avenue 6o on the north and Monroe Street and City boundary on the other sides. This area consists of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta (a retirement community). As discussed above, it shows as "High Segregation & Poverty" most likely due to its location in a larger census tract that includes primarily unincorporated rural/agricultural communities. Based on local knowledge and data, the area in southern La Quinta is least likely to experience segregation based on race/income or qualify as Area of High Segregation and Poverty. Sites 17-20 are located in or adjacent to this area and designated for above moderate income units. The vacant land inventory will increase housing supply in the southern end of the City, and is not expected to improve or exacerbate existing conditions regarding integration and segregation based on race and income. 1o8 452 Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty and Affluence As noted, the R/ECAP is designated at census tract level for Tract 456.05, which spans a large area of unincorporated Riverside County and a small portion in the City of La Quinta (Exhibits II-16 & II-17). Due to data granularity reasons and local knowledge discussed above, this designation is most likely inaccurate for the small area in La Quinta. Consisting of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community, this area should be designated as "Moderate Resource" or better, with potential drawbacks being its distance from job opportunities and schools. Sites 17 and 18 in this area are designated for above moderate income units. As the R/ECAP designation most likely does not apply to this area of the City, the vacant land inventory will not improve or exacerbate existing conditions regarding R/ECAP. There is one potential RCAA in the City, Census Tract 456.08 along the eastern City boundary (Exhibit II-18) with a median income greater than $125,000 and 89.6% non -Hispanic white population. Sites 15, 16, 19, and 20 would provide 305 above moderate income units in this area. Based on the opportunity area map (Exhibit II-14) and local knowledge and data, Census Tract 456.08 is not in the Highest Resource area of the City, is mostly built out with retirement communities, and offers very limited opportunities for education, employment, services/amenities, and transit. Therefore, the City has prioritized providing more affordable housing in areas that offer ample opportunities such as the northern City. The vacant land inventory may exacerbate the potential for RCAA in Census Tract 456.08; however, this housing sites distribution serves to maximize access to opportunities for households that need affordable housing. Access to Opportunity The opportunity area map designates the majority of the City as "Highest Resource" or "High Resource", which indicate areas whose characteristics have been shown by research to support positive economic, educational, and health outcomes for low-income families — particularly long-term outcomes for children. As discussed above, local knowledge and data indicate that the appropriate designation for the southern end of the City should be "Moderate Resource" or better. Using the statewide opportunity area map, local knowledge, and indicators of segregation, displacement risk, and access to opportunity as overlays to the City's vacant land inventory, the City was able to identify sufficient sites for 1,072 affordable units in La Quinta's sixth cycle inventory (see Exhibit II-25 and Table II-50) in areas identified by 10c) TCAC/HUD as either "Highest Resource" or "High Resource" with the highest Jobs Proximity Index scores. Sites 17 and 18 designated for 151 above moderate income units fall in the "High Segregation & Poverty" area, which is an inaccurate designation as discussed above and in fact the area qualifies for "Moderate Resource" or better. Several sites identified for affordable housing providing 655 units are located along the Highway 111 corridor, which offers a variety of resources and amenities. Two bus routes serve the area, which provide local and regional connectivity in the City, Coachella Valley and San Bernardino County (a commuter route). The Highway 111 corridor area features walkable streets and neighborhoods, and provides walking access to retail, restaurants, grocery and personal services. There are elementary and high schools and public parks nearby. Similarly, the sites in the inventory near the Village area, which would generate 36 lower income units also have easy access to the various retail, dining and services there, as well as La Quinta Library, Civic Center Park and La Quinta Museum. There are two elementary schools and one preschool in the Village area and vicinity. SunLine Bus Route 7 serves the Village area. These future housing sites affirmatively further fair housing through their proximity to jobs, education and transit, neighborhood retail and services, all of which can reduce the overall cost of living for lower -income households. The stores, restaurants and offices in both the Highway 111 and Village commercial districts provide various job opportunities. The City analyzed environmental constraints, including wildfire zones, too -year special flood hazard areas and geological hazard zones, and confirmed that none of the sites identified are within or near any identified hazard zones that cannot be mitigated with standard construction techniques. With the implementation of standard requirements such as site -specific geotechnical studies, the sites identified in the vacant land inventory will not subject future residents to any environmental hazards. Evidence provided by the HUD tables and maps reveal there are no disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, except that the southern City area has an inaccurate designation for less positive environmental outcomes due to its location in a larger tract. When compared with the east Coachella Valley and areas north of the Interstate-1o, the City scores higher in the environmental domain. Overall, the vacant land inventory is expected to improve access to opportunities for households in need by increasing affordable housing stock in high and highest resource areas. 110 454 Disproportionate Housing Needs The fair housing assessment identified that there is likely demand for units with at least two bedrooms for family and non -family households based on the household makeup of the City. Among the areas that over 40% of renters and owners experience overpayment, Tract 451.20 is further designated as vulnerable/sensitive community regarding displacement risk. Tract 451.2o has a relatively high (25%-50%) low to moderate income (LMI) population (Exhibit II-zoa), with the Village area (Block Group 3 in Tract 451.2o) having 50%-75% LMI population. The City completed the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan and EIR in 2017. Projects in the Village area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Municipal Code Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre and facilitates the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. Per Section 9.140.090.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. Sites z & 3 in the vacant land inventory will be able to take advantage of the mixed use overlay incentives and increase affordable housing supply in the Village area. The City also intends to apply the Affordable Housing Overlay to all sites identified in the vacant land inventory (Program l.l.b.), including sites in the Village area and along the Highway 111 corridor. These measures are expected to expand housing options for various income levels and foster a more economically diverse community. The City is also implementing traffic improvements including new roundabouts in the Village area, where pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart, and automobile traffic exist. The new roundabouts will help accommodate non -vehicular traffic, making roadways safer and more accessible to pedestrians and bicycles in the area and meeting the transportation needs of all segments of the community. Contributing Factors Discussions with community members and organizations, government agencies, affordable housing developers, and the assessment of fair housing issues identified several factors that contribute to fair housing issues in La Quinta, including: 111 455 • Low vacancy rates and limited availability of affordable, accessible units in a range of sizes, especially for lower -income renters, families with children and disabled people. • Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs including rising rents and stagnant income. • Lack of information made easily available to all segments of the community on landlord, tenant and buyer rights and opportunities. This may indirectly contribute to discriminatory practices during leasing and lending processes. Based on this assessment, these contributing factors largely stem from a common issue of limited options and supply. The City identified two priorities to further fair housing: expand availability of affordable housing and combat discriminatory practices through education. Programs under Policies H-1.4 and H-5.52 focus on information dissemination to all segments of the City population for affirmatively furthering fair housing and combating discrimination. Additionally, the City has incorporated meaningful actions that address disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity for all groups protected by state and federal law, through preservation and new development of affordable housing and encouraging a variety of housing products including accessory dwelling units and other creative housing solutions such as shipping container conversions. (See Programs H-1.1.a, H-2.1.a through H-2.1.c, H-2.3.a through H-2.3.d, H-3.3.b, H-4.4.a through H- 4.4.e). HOUSING CONSTRAINTS Constraints to the provision of adequate and affordable housing are posed by both governmental and nongovernmental factors. These factors may result in housing that is not affordable to lower and moderate income households or may render residential construction economically infeasible. Constraints to housing production significantly impact households with lower incomes and special housing needs. To accurately assess the housing environment in the City of La Quinta, close consideration needs to be given to a series of constraints; the housing market, infrastructure, and environmental and governmental factors that impact the cost of housing. 112 456 Nongovernmental Constraints Although housing costs in the Coachella Valley region are, on average, below other metropolitan areas in Southern California, the cost of renting or purchasing adequate housing in La Quinta continues to be influenced by a number of market factors. Costs associated with labor, raw land, materials, and financing influence the availability of affordable housing. Land and Construction Costs Land costs include the costs of raw land, site improvements, and all costs associated with obtaining government approvals. Factors affecting the costs of land include overall availability within a community, environmental site conditions, public service and infrastructure availability, aesthetic considerations, and parcel size. The cost of land is an important component in determining the cost of housing development. Land in the Coachella Valley has been and remains relatively affordable compared to other Southern California markets. A 2020 survey of single- and multi -family undeveloped residential land sales in La Quinta shows that vacant residential land ranges from $99,00o for a 0.12-acre parcel in the Cove to $1.5 million for a 0.47-acre parcel in Tradition. The average cost is $448,493 per acre. Construction costs can constitute up to 50 percent of the cost of a single-family detached home. Labor costs are usually two to three times the cost of materials, and thus make up 17 to 20 percent of the total cost of a new home. Labor costs are based on a number of factors, including housing demand, the number of contractors in the area, and union status of workers. However, state law requires the payment of prevailing wages for most private projects built under an agreement with a public agency providing assistance to the project, except for certain types of affordable housing. All cities are affected by these laws. In the Coachella Valley, construction costs for single-family dwelling units generally range between $235 to over $275 per square foot (excluding site improvements).'? Construction costs for vertical multi- family units generally range from $125 to $145 per square foot, based on typical 50-70 unit project with a 2 to 3 story garden style, Type V wood building." A survey of regional affordable housing developers determined that the average construction cost for affordable housing units in the Coachella Valley is approximately $317,074 per unit. Costs can vary widely depending on a number of factors, including but not limited 17 Gretchen Gutierrez, CEO, Desert Valleys Builders Association, March 2021. '$ Chris Killian, Senior Vice President of Construction, National Core, March 2021. to, location, project site, unit size, bedroom count, finishes, fixtures, amenities, building type, and wage and hiring requirements. Other determining factors include site -specific terrain and soil conditions, environmental factors, and availability of infrastructure. The construction cost of housing may be considered a constraint to affordable housing in the La Quinta area. The City cannot directly control construction costs. Hence, increases in these costs amplify the need for subsidies to achieve affordability in residential units. Through density bonus provisions, the City provides incentives and relief to the development community in exchange for the inclusion of affordable housing into a project. Financing Interest rates impact both the purchase price of the unit and the ability to purchase a home. Interest rates are determined by national policies and economic market conditions and local government has no impact on these rates. Historical market trends reveal that when interest rates are high, a potential homeowner's ability to secure a loan decreases. Conversely, when rates are low, homeownership becomes more accessible to more families. The La Quinta market has demonstrated that when interest rates are low, the majority of housing demand focuses on single-family homes. When interest rates are high (in excess of about 12 percent) for any length of time, only a small percentage of new home buyers can qualify for monthly mortgage payments on the average market rate single- family home. At this point, demand shifts to lower priced units, usually multifamily, and construction trends follow. First-time home buyers are the group most impacted by financing requirements. The currently low mortgage rates (at or below 4 percent) facilitate first-time home buying. Typically, conventional home loans will require 5 to zo percent of the sale price as a down payment, which is one of the largest constraints to first-time home buyers. When interest rates are low, they are not generally a serious constraint to affordable housing. Further, lower interest rates help support home purchases by low and moderate income households, who may not be able to qualify at higher rates. There is no evidence that nongovernmental constraints affect the City's ability to meet the RHNA. Furthermore, the City cannot influence banks, lending institutions or the suppliers of building materials. Although the City will continue to work with the affordable housing development 114 458 community to reduce costs and encourage development through fee waivers, density bonus provisions and other means over which it has control, it cannot impact the national economy. Governmental Constraints The City has traditionally exercised authority in the areas of land use controls, site improvement requirements, building codes, fees, and other regulatory programs. General Plan Land Use Designations The two General Plan residential designations are Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential. The densities of individual parcels are further refined in the Zoning Ordinance. Under General Plan Program LU-7.1.a (Policy LU-7.1), the City has established a mixed -use overlay that allows for the construction of housing to be integrated in various ways, such as above office space or commercial uses. The overlay is applied to all commercial zones. The mixed use overlay works together with the affordable housing overlay to raise densities to 24 units per acre (not including density bonus). The density ranges allowed for each residential district used to calculate housing at build out are listed in Table II-38. Table II-38 Residential General Plan and Zoning Districts General Plan Zoning Density Purpose Very Low Density Up to z units One -to two-story single-family Residential (RVL) per acre detached homes on large lots; at Low Density the southeastern boundary of the City. Low Density Up to 4 units Single-family attached and Residential (RL) per acre detached development, both in a country club setting and in standard subdivisions. Agriculture/ Applied to Allows continuation of Equestrian underlying agricultural activities in Vista Residential Overlay residential Santa Rosa area. (A/ER) designations Medium Density Up to 8 units One -to two-story single-family Residential (RM) per acre detached and attached homes on Cove Residential medium to small sized lots; (RC) clustered small dwellings, such as Medium High one to two-story single-family Density condominiums, townhomes, or apartment and duplexes. 45� Table II-38 Residential General Plan and Zoning Districts General Plan Zoning Density Purpose Medium High Up to 12 One -to two-story, single-family Density Residential units per detached homes on small lots; (RMH) acre one -to two-story single-family attached homes; one -and two- story townhomes, condominiums and multifamily dwellings. Mobile home parks may be allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. High Density Up to 24 One -to two-story single-family Residential (RH) units per attached homes; one -to three - acre for story townhomes and multifamily affordable dwellings. Duplex and multiplex housing sites development is the most common. Mobile home parks or subdivisions with common area amenities and open space may also be allowed subject to a Conditional Use Permit. General Regional Up to 24 High density residential uses are Commercial Commercial (CR) units per permitted with a Conditional Use Commercial Park acre for Permit. (CP) affordable Community housing and Commercial (CC) with mixed Neighborhood use overlay Commercial (CN) Office Commercial (CO) Village Commercial Village Commercial Up to 24 Medium High and High Density (VC) units per residential land uses are acre for appropriate. Live/work housing is affordable also appropriate. housing and with mixed use overlay Tourist Commercial Tourist Commercial Up to 24 Multifamily residential and (CT) units per condominium development is acre with permitted with a Conditional Use mixed use Permit. overlay Source: City of La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Code 2021 Zoning Code The residential zone portions of the Zoning Code impact housing affordability in several ways. The Zoning Code regulates such features as building height and density, lot area, setbacks, minimum units, and 116 460 open space requirements for each zoning district. Development standards for the six residential zoning classifications and two overlay districts are provided in Table II-39• Residential land use regulations allow for single-family detached development by right at allowable densities between o and 12 units per acre. Single-family detached housing at higher densities may be achieved with a specific plan for individual projects as long as overall density is not exceeded. Single-family attached and multifamily development is permitted by right at densities between 8 and 24 units per acre and these types of residential uses are also permitted in lower density zones under the provisions of a specific plan. A variety of residential development is possible in the City, ranging in average density from less than two units per acre for lands designated Low Density to 24 units per acre for affordable housing in the High Density and all Commercial categories. If a density bonus is utilized, greater residential densities may be achieved in any zone. Table II-38 identifies the list of permitted uses by residential district. The Zoning Ordinance also includes Supplemental Residential Regulations, which address a wide range of issues, from how to measure building height, to satellite dish installation and recreational vehicle storage. These standards are not subjective, and serve to clarify requirements for specific uses. Lower Density Residential Districts The RVL and RL zones provide for low density residential uses with densities consistent with the General Plan LDR designation (up to four units per acre). Single-family development in lower density zones is allowed through a building permit, following administrative review for consistency with the Zoning Code and state requirements. Developments requiring a tract map to establish new lots of record are reviewed by various City departments and adopted through Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. Typical conditions of approval relate to environmental quality such as erosion control, storm drainage, and access. Higher density uses, such as patio homes, duplexes, attached single- family dwellings, townhomes, and condominiums, may be permitted in RVL and RL zones when part of a specific plan or planned unit development (PUD), as long as the overall density of the project does not exceed that permitted by the underlying zone. The specific plan is reviewed by various City departments and a determination is made by 461 the City Council at a regularly scheduled public hearing. Specific plans are typically adopted by resolution and are common throughout the City. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), and guest houses are permitted as accessory uses in all residential districts. ADUs and JADUs are permitted in any residential zone, and guest houses are permitted on any single-family residential lot. In the RVL and RL zones, more than one guesthouse may be permitted with director approval. The City's ADU requirements may not be consistent with current State law. Program 2.1.a provides for the modification of the Zoning Code to comply with current law. These types of housing units are described further below. Residential care facilities with 6 or fewer persons, and senior citizen residences with 6 or fewer persons, are also permitted in all residential districts. Congregate living facilities with 6 or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts, except RH. Development in the Cove, under RC zoning, allows for development and preservation of the character of the Cove, with one story single-family detached dwellings. The Zoning Code also establishes a minimum 7,200- square-foot lot size, which may require lot consolidation in some circumstances. However, as the majority of the Cove was originally subdivided into 5,000 square foot lots, existing lots less than 7,200 square feet are considered buildable nonconforming lots. Medium and High -Density Residential Districts The RM, RMH, and RH zones allow an upper range of development density consistent with the General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation. Minimum side yards and setbacks are required where a project abuts an exterior boundary or a public street. However, lot coverage, width, and setbacks within a project are variable to allow for clustering or creative lot configurations, as well as creating space for desired recreational and open space amenities. As shown in Table II-39, the development standards in the RMH and RH zones are not a constraint: front yard setbacks for apartments are 20 feet, side yards 5 to 15 feet, and rear yard setbacks 15 to 20 feet. Given that apartments include parking areas surrounding the buildings, front and rear setbacks of this dimension allow for the placement of driveways, parking spaces and carports, and do no limit the use of the site. As demonstrated at the Wolff Waters and Coral Mountain Apartments, the Zoning Ordinance does not constrain the development of multifamily housing. Multifamily development is allowed in all three zones with a Site Development Permit approved at regularly scheduled Planning Commission public hearings. 118 462 The City's Zoning Code allows for innovation in design standards and densities as long as the overall density and dwelling unit capacity is not exceeded. Residential compatibility standards have been incorporated into the Zoning Code, which governs conditions where higher or lower density uses are proposed than the General Plan designation. As explained previously, ADUs, JADUs, and guest houses are permitted as an accessory use in all residential districts, including the RM, RMH, and RH zones. In the CR, RM, RMH, and RH zones, only one guesthouse may be permitted on a lot unless otherwise approved through a specific plan. Residential care facilities with 6 or fewer persons, and senior citizen residences with 6 or fewer persons, are also permitted in all residential districts. Additionally, senior group housing with 7 or more persons are permitted with a minor use permit in the RM, RHM, and RH districts. Supportive and transitional housing is permitted with a conditional use permit in the RM, RHM, and RH districts. Congregate living facilities with 6 or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts, except RH. Residential Uses in Nonresidential Districts There are development opportunities for residential uses in several of La Quinta's nonresidential zones (Table II-39). Multifamily housing is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in all commercial zones except Major Community Facilities (MC). Residential uses are to be developed at densities consistent with the High Density residential designations. The Village Build -Out Plan Area encourages residential development in mixed use projects according to the standards and incentives of the Mixed Use Overlay. Maximum permitted densities are 25-30 units per acre, depending on location, which are higher than those permitted in any residential zone or the Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) (up to 24 du/ac). Maximum building height is 45 feet, which is higher than that permitted in any residential zone (maximum 40 feet). As such, the Village Build -Out Plan Area does not constrain development. As with most commercial zones, projects can be developed in the Village Commercial District that are loo percent residential in use, as there is no requirement that a project be a mix of residential and nonresidential uses. Development standards specific to the Village currently include a 45400t maximum height. Residential floors generally range from 10-12 feet in height. If a project contains solely residential uses, the 45400t height limit does not constrain development. liq 463 Mixed use projects consisting of both multifamily residential and commercial/office components are permitted in all commercial districts except MC. The Mixed Use Overlay also facilitates mixed use projects. Uses may be integrated vertically (residential over commercial) or horizontally (residential next to commercial). Residential densities range between 12 and 24 units per acre, although higher densities may be achieved through density bonuses, including a density bonus of lo% where at least 30% of total project square footage consists of retail uses. Maximum heights vary from 35 to 6o feet, depending on the underlying district, but heights may be up to 25% more than the base district if approved in the site development permit. The Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) allows development of affordable housing at higher densities within commercial zones (CC, CP, CN, CR, and VC) and other sites identified on the zoning map. The AHO provides increased and enhanced opportunities for affordable housing development, including maximizing the housing potential of vacant and underutilized sites. Zoning Code Section 9.60.26o describes opportunities for granting density bonuses and other incentives and concessions for the development of units affordable to low and very low income households, senior citizen housing, mobile home parks, and moderate income households. Available concessions may include reductions in setback or parking requirements, modifications of architectural design requirements, or other approved measures that can result in cost reductions to the developer. As provided in Program H- 3.1.a, the AHO will be applied to all affordable inventory sites, with a density increase to 30 units per acre. Rooming and boarding houses and senior group housing are permitted in the VC zone if a minor use permit is approved. Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels are conditionally permitted in the CR zone. Emergency shelters are permitted in all commercial zones except VC. Transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic abuse are permitted in the CR and MC zones with a conditional use permit. Transitional and supportive housing are permitted in the Medium, Medium -High and High Density residential zones with a conditional use permit. This is not consistent with other residential uses, which are permitted uses in the same zones. Program H-5.4.b requires that these uses be changed to permitted uses in those zones. 120 464 Table II-39 2021 Residential Development Standards' Development Standard RVL RL RC RM RMH RH Min. Lot Size for Single- 20,00 7,zoo 7,zoo 5,00 3,60o z,000 Family Dwelling(sq ft) 0 0 Min. Project Size for Multifamily Projects N/A N/A N/A N/A 20,000 20,000 (sq ft) Min. Lot Frontage for Single -Family Dwellings 100 60 60 50 40 N/A (ft)' Min. Frontage for N/A N/A N/A N/A 100 100 Multifamily Projects (ft) Max. Structure Height 28 28 17 28 28 40 (ft) z Max. No. of Stories z z 1 z z 3 Min. Front Yard Setback (ft)3 30 20 Zo 20 20 20 Min. Garage Setback (ft)4 30 25 25 25 25 25 Min. Interior/Exterior 10/20 5/10 5/10 5/10 5/10 10/15 Side Yard Setback (ft)5, 7 20 for new Min. Rear Yard Setback lots/10 (ft)7 30 for 10 15 15 zo existing recorde d lots' Max. Lot Coverage 40 50 60 60 60 60 (% of net lot area) Min. Livable Area 2,500 1,400 1,200 1,400 1,400 (MF: MF: Excluding Garage (sf) 750 750) Min. Common Open N/A N/A N/A 30% 30% 30% Area' Min./Average Perimeter Landscape Setbacks 10/20 10/20 N/A 10/20 10/20 10/20 (ft)6 i-8 for notes, see Zoning Code Table 9-2. Source: Table 9-2, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021. 1 Residential uses in Commercial zones are subject to the RH development standards. 121 465 Table II-40 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Residential Zoning District Residential ZoningDistrict Low Low Cove Medium Medium High Land Use High RVL RL RC RM RMH RH Single -Family Detached P P P P P S Single -Family Detached patio homes (i.e., "zero PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD lot -line") Duplex PUD PUD X PUD P P Single -Family Attached PUD PUD X PUD P P Townhome PUD PUD X P P P -dwellings Condominium Multifamily PUD PUD X P P P Apartment Multifamily X X X P P P Mobile Home Park C C C C C C Mobile Home Subdivision and Manufactured Home on individual P P P P P X lots, subject to Section 9.6o.18o Resort Residential, subject to Section P P X P P P 9.6 o.31 o Guesthouses, subject to Section A A A A A A 9.6o.loo Second residential units subject to A A A A A A Section 9.6o.o90 Group Living and Care Uses Congregate Living Facility (<_6 persons) P P P P P X Congregate Care Facility C C C C C C Residential Care Facility (<6 persons) P P P P P P Senior Citizen Residence (<_6 P P P P P P persons) 122 466 Table II-40 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Residential Zoning District Residential ZoningDistrict Low Low Cove Medium Medium High Land Use High RVL RL RC RM RMH RH Senior Group Housing (7+ X X X M M M persons) Time share facilities, subject to Section M M M M M M 9.60.280 Bed and breakfast M M M M M M inns Supportive housing X X X C C C Transitional housing X X X C C C Source: Table 9-1, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021 P = Permitted use; C = Conditional use permit; M = Minor use permit; S= Specific plan; A = Accessory use; X = Prohibited use, PUD = Planned unit development Table II-41 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Nonresidential Zoning District Land Use Zoning District Regional Commercial Community Neighbor- Tourist Office Major Village Commercial Park Commercial hood Commercial Commercial Community Commercial Commercial Facilities CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Existing Single- Family home X X X X X X X P Townhome and Multifamily C C C C C C X C dwelling as a primary use Residential as an accessory use, e.g., caretaker M M M M M M M M residences per Section 9.1 oo.16o Resort Residential, subject to S X C X P X X P Section 9.60.310 40 Table II-41 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Nonresidential Zoning District Land Use Zoning District Regional Commercial Community Neighbor- Tourist Office Major Village Commercial Park Commercial hood Commercial Commercial Community Commercial Commercial Facilities CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC RV Rental Parks and Ownership X X X X M X X X Membership Parks Emergency P P P P P P P X Shelter Rooming/ Boarding X X X X X X X M Housing Senior Group Housing X X X X X X X M Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Hotel, subject to C X X X X X X X Section 9.100.250 Transitional Shelters for homeless C X X X X X C X persons or victims of domestic abuse Single-family residential X X X X X X X X Mixed -use projects, subject to Section P P P P P P X P 9.110.120 Hotels and motels P X P X P X X P Timeshare facilities, fractional ownership, P X P X P X X P subject to Section 9.60.28o Source: Table 9-5, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021 P = Permitted use; C = Conditional use permit; M = Minor use permit; A = Accessory use; X = Prohibited use 124 468 Density Bonus California law (Government Code Sec. 65915 et seq.) allows for an increase in the density of a residential development when a developer donates land or constructs affordable housing as a part of a project. A density bonus of 20 percent above the maximum permitted density may be granted if a project includes 5 percent of the units at rates affordable to very low income households or to percent of the units at rates affordable to low income households. If to percent of the total units are affordable to moderate income households in a common interest development, then the project is eligible to receive a 5 percent density bonus. In addition, a sliding scale requires additional density bonuses above the base zo percent. The maximum density bonus is 35 percent over the maximum allowable density under the applicable zoning and General Plan designation. With a density bonus, allowable residential densities range from 2.7 units per acre in the RVL zone to 32 units per acre in the high density and mixed -use zones and specific plans. Projects that are restricted to senior residents are also eligible for a density bonus of 20 percent without any income -restricted units. The density bonus is not required to exceed 20 percent and is not subject to the sliding scale mentioned above unless a minimum number of income - restricted units are included. Effective January 1, 2021, AB 2345 amends the state's Density Bonus Law to increase the maximum density bonus from 35% to 50% for projects that provide at least: 1) 15% of total units for very low income households, 2) 24% of total units for low income households, or 3) 44% of total for -sale units for moderate income households. AB 2345 also decreases the threshold of set -aside low income units required to qualify for concessions or incentives from zoning or development regulations, and decreases the number of parking spaces required for z and 3-bedroom units. Density bonus projects within % mile of a major transit stop that provide unobstructed access to the transit stop may also qualify for reduced parking requirements. Program 4-2.2.a directs the City to amend the Zoning Ordinance accordingly to assure compliance with AB 2345• Accessory Dwelling Units In 2020/2021, to comply with AB 2299, the City modified Zoning Code Section 9.60.090 pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The modifications ease barriers to development of ADUs. ADUs are 0 independent living quarters on existing home lots, the use of which is subordinate and incidental to the main building or use. They can provide affordable rental opportunities for lower and moderate income households, including seniors, disabled persons, single parents, domestic employees, and extended family members. ADUs create additional housing opportunities on already developed or developing parcels and can provide a source of income for homeowners. They are often referred to as "casitas" throughout the Coachella Valley. ADUs are permitted in all residential -only zones and can be attached or detached to the primary residence. Conditions on the ADU require that no interest in the ADU(s) may be sold separately from the remainder of the property, though the unit may be rented (not less than 3o days); that the lot contain an existing single-family dwelling that conforms to the minimum lot size requirement; that the ADU is no larger than 1,200 square feet or 30 percent of the primary home; and must have a minimum of one off-street parking space on the same lot that the ADU is located. Parking requirements may be waived in certain circumstances, including when the ADU is within one-half mile of public transit or one-half block of a car -share station, within an architecturally and historically significant district, part of an existing primary residence or accessory structure, and/or required to obtain a parking permit from the City. The City's ADU requirements may not be consistent with current State law. Program 2.1.a provides for the modification of the Zoning Code to comply with current law. Guest Houses Guest houses are detached or attached units with sleeping and sanitary facilities, which may include full bathroom and/or kitchen or cooking facilities. Standards and criteria for the establishment of guest houses are provided in Zoning Code Section 9.6o.loo. The purpose of guest houses is to provide free on -site housing for relatives, guests and domestic employees. This type of unit can be particularly important to provide housing opportunities for the City's extremely low income workforce. Guest houses are permitted as accessory uses in all residential zones on any single-family lot, but are not permitted when duplexes, triplexes, or apartments occur on the lot. A guest house may not exceed 30 percent of the square footage of the primary structure and must conform to lot coverage requirements. Manufactured Housing Requirements Manufactured housing and mobile homes are considered housing alternatives, especially for serving the needs of lower -income households. Manufactured homes and mobile home subdivisions are 126 470 permitted uses in all residential zones, except for High Density Residential, subject to the provisions of Zoning Code Section 9.6o.180, which requires approval of a minor use permit by the Planning Commission prior to the placement of a manufactured home on a single- family lot to ensure that it is consistent with the development standards of the single-family zone. Mobile home parks are permitted with a conditional use permit in all residential districts. Short -Term Vacation Rentals Municipal Code Section 3.25 defines a short-term vacation rental (STVR) unit as a privately owned residential dwelling such as, but not limited to, a single-family detached or multifamily attached unit, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings, rented for occupancy for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days. Homeowners are required to obtain a STVR permit and business license, manage the unit in accordance with established regulations, and collect transient occupancy taxes (TOT) at a rate of 10% of the rent charged. In 2021, the City reviewed its STVR standards and made modifications to limit permitting and strengthen the enforcement regulations, following residents' concerns regarding over -saturation and lack of management at some locations. STVRs provide homeowners with opportunities to increase their incomes, which can offset their housing costs. STVRs comprise 1,170 of the 25,143 housing units, or 4.6% of the housing stock in the City, and are not considered a constraint to housing. Low Barrier Navigation Centers Assembly Bill (AB) 101 requires that Low Barrier Navigation Centers (LBNC) be a by -right use in areas zoned for mixed use and nonresidential zoning districts permitting multifamily uses. LBNCs provide temporary room and board with limited barriers to entry while case managers work to connect homeless individuals to income, public benefits, permanent housing, or other shelter. Program H-5.4.a of this Housing Element directs the City to review and revise the Zoning Ordinance, as necessary, to ensure compliance with AB 101, and to modify the definition of "homeless shelter" to include this use. Parking Requirements Parking requirements in the City of La Quinta, shown in Table II-42, are typical for a city of its size with resort -oriented characteristics. The parking requirements are based on unit size for market housing, and are permitted to be reduced based on alternative analysis methodology. 4 71 Additionally, the parking requirements for special needs uses are relatively minimal and facilitate the construction of such uses. Reductions in required parking spaces are often a concession granted to affordable housing developers through the City's density bonus provisions. Overall, the parking requirements do not directly constrain the development of housing. Table II-42 Parking Requirements for Residential Uses Land Use Minimum Off -Street Guest Spaces Parking Spaces Single -Family Detached, 2 spaces per unit in a 0.5 guest space per unit if Single -Family Attached garage no on -street parking is and Duplex Tandem garages allowed in available RC zone Mobile Home Park 2 covered spaces per unit 0.5 guest space per unit (tandem permitted) Apartments, townhomes, and condominiums: (1) Studio 1 covered space per unit 0.5 guest space per unit (2) One- and Two- 2 covered spaces per unit 0.5 guest space per unit Bedrooms (3) Three or More 3 covered spaces per unit, 0.5 guest space per unit Bedrooms plus 0.5 covered space per each bedroom over three Employee Quarters 1 covered or uncovered space. This space shall not be tandem. Senior Housing (excluding 1 covered space per unit 0.5 guest spaces per unit single family units) Senior Group Housing, 0.5 covered spaces per unit 0.5 guest space per unit Senior Citizen Hotel, and Congregate Care Facility Source: Table 9-11, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021 Subdivision Improvement Requirements The City maintains subdivision improvement requirements that contribute to the cost of housing. In many cases, a developer may be required to provide any or all of the required improvements within a subdivision or a single residential project. Although the provision of these improvements or actions required to meet subdivision requirements may cumulatively add costs to the provision of housing, they are not considered a deterrent, as they are required throughout California with public safety as the underlying factor. Subdivision regulations are provided in Municipal Code Title 13; pertinent improvements include: 128 472 • Full -width street improvements for all internal subdivision streets and alleys shall be installed; • Where a subdivision borders a public street, the developer shall provide half -width right-of-way improvements, plus one additional travel lane on the opposite side of the centerline if it does not already exist; • Additional rights -of -way or easements shall be provided, where necessary, to accommodate roadway slopes, drainage structures, bicycle or equestrian paths and trails, and other facilities related to subdivision development; • Minimum landscape setback widths shall be 50 feet from Highway 111, 20 feet from other arterial streets, 20 feet from primary arterial streets, 10 feet from secondary arterial streets, and to feet from collector streets; • The size and configuration of streets shall comply with Exhibits 11-2 and 11-3, as amended, of the General Plan circulation element. Cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum curb radius of 45 feet for private streets and 38 feet for public streets; • Private streets are limited to 36 feet in width when parking is double loaded, 32 feet when single loaded; • Sidewalks are required to be provided on both sides of the street within public rights -of -way of all General Plan designated arterial and collector streets, for local streets in residential areas and in areas designated rural residential overlay where densities exceed 3 du/ac; • Transit facilities, such as bus turnouts and covered bus shelters and benches, are required if a bus stop occurs adjacent to the development site, on General Plan designated arterial and collector streets; • Street width transitions, pavement elevation transitions and other incidental work deemed necessary for public safety may be required to ensure that new construction is safely integrated with existing improvements; • Improvements shall include traffic signs, channelization markings/devices, street name signs, medians, sidewalks, and mailbox clusters; • The developer shall provide improvements connecting the subdivision to the domestic water supply and distribution system operated by the Coachella Valley Water District, and is required to connect to an existing sewer collection system; • Prior to the completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the subdivision, the subdivider shall install traffic -control devices and street name signs along access roads to the homes or buildings. 473 Local Processing and Permit Procedures The cost of holding land by a developer during the evaluation and review process is frequently cited by builders as a contributing factor to the high cost of housing. The California Government Code establishes permitted time periods for local agencies to review and act upon private development proposals. Typical local development application processing times identified in Table II-43 reflect both single- and multifamily uses. State -imposed time restrictions are identified in Table 11-44• Table II-43 Local Development Processing Times Item Typical Length of Time From Submittal to Public Hearin Site Development Permit 9-12 weeks Conditional Use Permit 8-10 weeks Tentative Tract Map 10-12 weeks Variance 8-10 weeks Zoning Amendments or Zone Change 9-12 weeks General Plan Amendment 12-16 weeks Specific Plan 12-16 weeks Environmental Documentation Runs with application Source: City of La Quinta 2021 Table II-44 State Development Processing Time Limits Item State Maximum General Plan Amendment None Zone Change None Subdivision Action on Tentative Map 5o Days Environmental Documentation/CEQA Review of Application for Completeness 3o Days Determination of NEG DEC or El Requirement' 3o Days Completion of NEG DEC Requirement 105 Days Certification of Final EIR 1 Year Source: California Permit Streamlining Act, 1977 ' The City attempts to process the Negative Declaration so that it runs with application La Quinta's City Council directed, during the last Housing Element cycle, that staff look at opportunities for development streamlining. The original Zoning Code changes were brought forward after review by a specially formed committee, which proposed a wide range of changes, many focused on moving review and approval authority to staff level decisions, or to the Planning Commission rather than the City Council. 130 474 This effort included Site Development Permits and other permits, which now can be approved by staff under specific circumstances, and a change in permitted and conditionally permitted uses that removed conditional use permits from a number of land uses in varying zones. Since the original amendments, the City annually completes a "Code Tune Up," which includes specific Zoning Code items that have arisen through each year. As a result of these processing changes, the City's entitlement process is one of the most efficient in the Coachella Valley. Site Development Permit The purpose of the site development permit (SDP) process is to review detailed plans for proposed development projects to ensure that the standards of the Zoning Code, including permitted uses, development standards and supplemental regulations, are satisfied. If the proposed project is part of a previously adopted specific plan, the review and approval of SDP application may be streamlined as called for in the specific plan. The SDP process enables the Planning Commission to review the site plan, architectural, lighting and landscape plans, and related development plans. The Planning Commission does not exercise discretionary review over the proposed land use; the focus on the SDP is on issues of site planning and design. The findings for a Site Development Permit require consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; conformance with CEQA; and compatibility of site design, landscaping and architecture to surrounding buildings. A SDP may take a minimum of g weeks for review, but the process could take as long as 3 months, or longer, if unforeseen complications arise. To reduce the amount of time required for plan review, the City provides the opportunity for a conceptual design review (sometimes referred to as a pre -application review) prior to formal application submittal to give the applicant information on City requirements and project feedback prior to committing to the application process. This conceptual review can save the applicant both time and money, making the proposed development more cost effective. Minor Use Permit A Minor Use Permit (MUP) is required for the following residential land uses: senior group housing (7+ persons) in RM, RMH, and RH zones; timeshare facilities in all residential zones; and manufactured homes on single-family lots. Most MUPs are administratively approved by Planning Division staff. On rare occasions, the project may be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing to ensure that it is consistent with the development standards in single-family zones. 4 5 Conditional Use Permit A conditional use permit (CUP) is required for congregate care facilities in any residential designation; mobile home parks in any residential designation; supportive and transitional housing in RM, RMH, and RH zones; multifamily housing in non-residential zones (except affordable land inventory sites which will be subject to the AHO (see Program 3.1.a), which allows multifamily projects by right); SRO hotels in the CR zone; and transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic violence in the CR and MC zones. The requirement for a CUP requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission. However, a CUP is often processed concurrently with an SDP; therefore, no additional time is required for the processing of the CU P. Typical findings required to approve a CUP are consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, consistency with the Zoning Code, compliance with CEQA, and certification that the proposed project is neither detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the public nor injurious to adjacent uses. The most common specific conditions of approval relate to mitigating environmental impacts such as erosion, storm water runoff, and traffic. These conditions are necessary to protect environmental integrity and public health and safety and are not considered a constraint to housing development. Discussions with affordable housing developers have consistently indicated that the City's CUP process does not inhibit the process or cost of building affordable housing. With the inclusion of the AHO on all affordable housing sites identified in Table 11-51, there will be no need for Conditional Use Permits, and this constraint will be eliminated. Specific Plan Specific plans are unique regulations designed to provide more flexibility than permitted through the Zoning Code. The processing of a specific plan can add 12 weeks to the project schedule. However, the additional entitlement rights, flexibility in design and use, and infrastructure negotiations obtained through the specific plan process generally outweigh the impacts of the additional time expenditure. Specific plans must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a public hearing. In La Quinta, specific plans are adopted by resolution. The required findings for approval are consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan; certification that the 132 476 project does not create conditions that are detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare; and proof that uses are compatible with nearby uses and the property is suitable for the proposed project. The City allows the concurrent processing of applications to accelerate the process. For example, for a specific plan that also requires a CUP, both permits would be processed at the same time so no additional review time is necessary. Overall, the processing periods and procedures are not considered a constraint to the production of housing by the development community. The City processes residential projects within statutory time frames. The processing period is typically expedited for projects within adopted specific plan areas, as environmental review has been conducted and standards have been imposed, e.g., exactions and payment schedules, design, etc., for the entire area and in itself does not significantly impact housing construction costs. Permitting Mixed Use Development Mixed use development can provide a lively, walkable, and convenient living and visiting experience. Mixed Use is allowed in most commercial zones in the City. The City has not determined any conditions of approval specific to mixed use development; conditions are determined on a case -by -case basis, reflecting the context and design of each project. Affordable housing developers in the area have indicated that the process in La Quinta has not posed a constraint to affordable housing projects. Development and Processing Fees Development fees and other assessments cover the costs for infrastructure, environmental protection, public services, and utilities incurred by residential development. These fees impact the cost of housing and may, therefore, reduce the ability for unassisted market - rate housing to provide units affordable to low income households. The City describes current fees and exactions that are applicable to housing development projects on its website, consistent with Government Code §6594o.l(a)(1)(A). The City imposes Developer Impact Fees on new development to fund the expansion and/or construction of public facilities, such as fire stations and parks and recreation facilities, as they are required and demanded. Government Code Section 6600l requires jurisdictions to identify the purpose and use of impact fees and determine whether there is a reasonable relationship between the use of a fee and type of development upon FIN which it is imposed, the need for the facility and type of development on which the fee is imposed, and the fee amount and the public facility cost attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. Current City developer impact fees (Table II-45) are based on the City's "Development Impact Fee Study" dated September 23, 2019 and adopted February 4, 2020, which demonstrates that reasonable relationships between development, public facilities, and fees exist. The City also charges fees for application and permit processing, plan checks, environmental analyses, and special studies. Some fees are a flat rate, and some require additional payment to cover costs of additional analysis by City staff and/or third party service providers. Planning fees are generally collected at the outset of the application process; others, like building fees, are collected at permit issuance. In addition to City fees and assessments, developers of new dwellings are obligated to pay fees imposed by other government agencies, such as Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees, Fish and Game fees, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), and other special district assessments, as applicable. Table II-46 presents an overview of City fees for an average 1,500- square-foot tract home with a two -car garage in a low density subdivision and an average 950-square-foot multifamily home with a two -car garage. Table II-47 identifies fees for various planning actions, such as zoning changes, tentative tract maps, and conditional use permits. Based on the fees presented in these tables, and the average cost of building a single family home in the City ($386,200), the development fees per unit would be about 138,613 per unit, or lo% of the building cost. Given that the City's fee schedule and development impact fees are consistent with those of other Coachella Valley cities, and that affordable housing projects are often exempted from fees, the costs associated with City fees are not considered a constraint to the development of affordable housing. In addition to these fees, all residential development in La Quinta and elsewhere in California is required to pay the State -mandated school impact fee, which varies by school district and adjusts from year to year. For residential development, the school impact fee is currently $3.79 per square foot in the Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) and $4.08 per square foot in the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD). The City has no control over this fee, and as it is charged in all cities, it cannot be considered a constraint on development in La Quinta. 134 478 While the fees charged by the City add to the cost of housing and, therefore, are a constraint to the provision of affordable housing, infrastructure improvements and processing must be paid. Instead of offering fee reductions or waivers for affordable housing projects, the City offers other incentives to promote infill or affordable housing development through Zoning Code Section 9.60.26o, which allows density bonuses for affordable housing and concessions that may include a waiver or reduction in site development standards, or a modification that can result in actual cost savings to the developer. A comparison of the City's fees with other communities in the Coachella Valley indicates that the City generally charges comparable fees to other cities. Table II-45 Impact Fees Per Unit of Development Land Use Type Development Units Total Feel Residential (SFD) Dwelling Unit $9,38o Residential (SFA) Z Dwelling Unit $7,719 Residential (MFO) 3 Dwelling Unit $6,113 Office/Hospital 1,000 SF $7,589 General Commercial 1,000 SF $9,191 Tourist Commercial/Lodging Room4 $2,864 Source: City of La Quinta, effective July 1, 2020 ' Residential -single-family detached. Z Residential -single-family attached 3 Residential -multi -family and other 4 Guest room or suite 5 Net Acre 6 Includes fees for park improvements, community/cultural, library, Civic Center, maintenance facilities, fire, and transportation. Table II-46 Development Fees for Typical Single -Family and Multifamily Homes Cost Per Unit Type of Fee I Multifamily I Single -Family z Building Fees (includes permit and plan check) New Construction Permit $1,855.18 $2,389.24 Plan Check $1,311.69 $1,585.99 Mechanica14 $104.64 $104.64 Plumbing5 $228.07 $308.56 Electrical $214•13 $233.45 Strong Motion Instrumentation Program $24 $38 99 ($0.50 or valuation x o.00013)$ Grading $148.12 $148.12 Other Fees Development Impact Fee $6,113 $9,380 Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan 3 $571 $1,371 TUM F7 $1,330 $2,310 CVWD Sewer -New Connection Fee $4,851 $4,851 CVWD Water- New Connection Fee $3,600 $3,600 Fish and Game Fee (unfinished lot) Negative Declaration -flat $3,220 fee $3,zzo $3,zzo Art in Public Places (Total Value) Based on project valuation charged at one $zo $z5o quarter of 1 percent of anything over $200,000 or $20 minimum Quimby fees (if in -lieu of land Based on per -acre Based on per -acre dedication —fee payment only option d FMV of land FMV of land for tracts of <50 lots/units) Total $23,591 $29,791 Source: City of La Quinta 2021 Calculated on a 950-square-foot unit valued at $181,030 (average value of single-family attached unit, per building permits issued 2014-2020) 2 Calculated on a 1,5oo-square-foot home valued at $299,933 (average value of single-family detached unit, per building permits issued 2014-2020) 3 $1,371/unit at o-8 DU/AC; $571/unit at 8.1-14 DU/AC; and $254/unit at >14 DU/AC; fees are passed through to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission 4 Assumes 1 furnace,1 refrigeration unit,1 cooling unit 5 Assumes plumbing fixtures (MF unit = 5 fixtures, SF unit = 8 fixtures), water heater, installation of water piping, sewer connection 6 Connection and meter installation (assumes 1-inch pipe, 1-inch backflow device, and %-inch meter) 7 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee passed through to CVAG 8 SMIP fees are passed through to the CA Department of Conservation 136 480 Table II-47 Planning Department Fee Schedule Item/Type Permit Base Fee* Conditional Use Permit $6,413 Planned Unit Dev. $6,413 Amendment $3,126 Time Extension $1,691 Site Development Permit Amendment $4,669 Time Extensions $1,691 Planning Commission $8,9o9 Administrative $7,621 Modification by Applicant $400 Development Agreement $3,327 Minor Adjustment $400 Variance $2,415 Minor Use Permit $400 Amendment $400 Final Landscape Plan $1,771 Housing SB 33o Application Review $1,288 Conceptual Design Review $2,254 Street Name Change $1,852 Historical Structures Landmark Designation/Cert of Appropriateness $1,320 General Plan Amendment $10,465 Specific Plan $1o,68o Amendment $4,776 Temporary Use Permit- Minor, Standard $400 Minor, Requiring Addl. Effort $400 Major, Standard $2,093 Major, Requiring Add]. Effort $2,093 Zoning Certificate of Compliance $505 Change of Zone $9,392 Zoning Text Amendment $9,445 Director's Determination $405 Letter, Basic Property Info $263 Letter, Addl. Research Required $1,369 Sign Permit $355 A -Frame Sign Permit $o Sign Program $2,844 Sign Program Amendment $966 Tentative Parcel Map $5,045 Waiver $1,369 Amendment $3,005 Revision $3,005 Time Extension $966 Amended Final Parcel Map $4,025 Table II-47 Planning Department Fee Schedule Item/Type Permit Base Fee* Tentative Tract Map $8,372 Revision $3,971 Amendment $3,971 Time Extension (CC or PC) $1,852 Time Extension (Admin) $1,047 Tentative Condominium Map $8,372 Amended Final Tract Map $6,440 Appeals $1,500 Environmental Review Environmental Assessment $483 Recordation of Exemption $161 Initial Study (ND/MND) $3,220 Environmental Impact Report $8,855 Zoning Clearance — Planning Plan Check Alteration/Addition — Resid. $81 New Construction — SF Resid. $161 New Construction — 2-4 Units $242 New Construction — 5+ Units $644 New Construction — non-resid. $322 Alteration/Addition — non-resid. $161 Source: City of La Quinta, adopted July 21, 2020 * In addition to the fees identified here, the City will pass through to the applicant any fees imposed by other agencies and any discrete costs incurred from the use of outside service providers required to process the specific application. Building Codes and Enforcement The City of La Quinta has adopted the following State Codes: 2019 California Building Code, 2019 California Mechanical Code, 2019 California Plumbing Code, 2019 California Energy Code, and the 2019 California Electrical Code. In addition, the City enforces the 2019 California Fire Code, Residential Code, and Green Building Standards Code. Overall, the Building Codes adopted by the City of La Quinta do not pose any special constraints on the production or cost of housing. The City has not made substantive amendments to the code that would adversely affect housing. The City of La Quinta enforces the Health and Safety Code, as it pertains to housing, which provides minimum health and safety standards for the maintenance of the existing housing supply. These standards are intended to provide for safe and sanitary housing that is fit for human habitation. The enforcement of the Health and Safety Code is normally handled on a complaint -response basis. 138 482 The most common housing -related problem is illegal additions/garage conversions. Warnings are issued with a referral to the City and other agencies for remediation assistance. The Housing Code mandates that health and safety deficiencies be corrected in accordance with construction standards that were in effect at the time the structure was built. In cases where property owners refuse to correct deficiencies, enforcement of the Housing Code relies on civil sanctions. Constraints to the Provision of Housing for Persons with Disabilities State law, per Senate Bill 52o, requires that in addition to an analysis of special housing needs for persons with disabilities, the Housing Element must analyze potential governmental constraints to the development, improvement and maintenance of housing for persons with disabilities. Programs must be included to remove constraints to providing adequate housing for persons with disabilities. The City maintains general processes for individuals with disabilities to make requests for reasonable accommodation through Section 9.60.320 of the Zoning Code, the permit processing process, and building codes. A reasonable accommodation request is reviewed and approved by the Director, based on the following findings: a. Whether the subject property will be used by an individual with disabilities protected under fair housing laws; b. Whether the requested accommodation is necessary to make housing available to an individual with disabilities protected under fair housing laws; c. Whether the requested accommodation would impose undue financial or administrative burdens on the city; d. Whether the request for accommodation would require a fundamental alteration in the nature of a city program or law; e. Potential impacts on surrounding land uses; f. Alternative reasonable accommodations that may provide an equivalent level of benefit; The City's process is administrative, and does not result in a constraint for persons requiring accommodation. Congregate living facilities with six or fewer persons are permitted by right in all residential zones except High Density; congregate care facilities with seven or more are permitted with a conditional use permit in all residential zones. Furthermore, residential care facilities and senior citizen residences of six or fewer persons are permitted in all residential zones. Senior homes of more than six are permitted subject to a Minor Use Permit in the RM, RMH, RH, and VC zones. ENRI The Zoning Code also includes provisions for the reduction of parking requirements for affordable, senior and special needs housing, including senior and/or group homes, if a project proponent can demonstrate a reduced need for parking. The City also enforces ADA standards for the number of parking spaces required for persons with disabilities. There are no conditions or requirements imposed for group homes that would affect the development or conversion of residences to meet the needs of persons with disabilities. There are no minimum distance standards between two or more special needs housing developments. The City of La Quinta has adopted the 2019 California Building Code, as well as the 2019 California Mechanical, Electrical, Energy, Fire, Residential, Green Building, and Plumbing Codes. No amendments have been made to the codes that would diminish the ability to accommodate persons with disabilities. There are no restrictions on requests for retrofitting of homes for accessibility, such as ramps and handrails. Requests for such retrofits are handled as any other minor improvement to a home necessitating a building permit, with the exception that the design must meet all applicable standards and ADA requirements, and is reviewed at the inspection phase for conformance to construction requirements. Although requests for retrofit of existing homes have been extremely limited in the past few years, a number of homes advertised for resale in the Cove area have been retrofitted or built specifically for persons with physical disabilities and are described as such. The public review process for the approval of group or senior homes is no different from any other permitted use in the applicable zone. Where a group or senior home is permitted by right, no public hearing is required. The project is brought to the Planning Commission if a MUP is required, and is subject to consideration and approval as any other use permitted by MUP. Where a senior group home may be requested with a MUP as part of a specific plan, the use would be considered and approved within the established public hearing process as part of the total specific plan and subject to the applicable Zoning Code provisions. Environmental and Infrastructure Constraints Development of new housing in La Quinta will continue to take place throughout the City. Public services and infrastructure are being upgraded and expanded within the City. Major flood control programs have been funded by the City and constructed by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for the protection of the Cove Area. In response to growth, Desert Sands and Coachella Valley Unified School Districts 140 484 operate several elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools that serve La Quinta residents. Three Riverside County Fire Department stations serve the City. The potable water system in the City is operated and administered by CVWD. The sanitary sewage collection and treatment system in the City is operated and administered by CVWD, which extends service based upon approved designs and improvements constructed by the private developer. Senate Bill (SB) 1o87 requires water and sewer providers to create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential projects. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings and requires future water management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development. The City routes the Housing Element update to CVWD to facilitate consistency with these requirements. The City of La Quinta is served by Southern California Gas Company. The Southern California Gas Company has indicated that the future supply of natural gas will meet demand generated by additional development in the City. Major infrastructure improvements, including full -width streets, water and sewer mains, and stormwater systems, are the responsibility of the developer to install with any development. Developers are required to provide parks or in -lieu fees as part of a residential development. When infrastructure improvements are made that benefit other properties, the subdivider is reimbursed from the area fund when other properties in the area are developed. Non -Governmental Constraints Projects requiring a Site Development Permit generally apply for building permits with 3o-go days of approval. The building permit plan check process is expedited, and if plans are submitted with only minor deficiencies, building permits will be issued within 30 to 6o days of submittal. The City has not received requests for projects at densities lower than that proposed in the Land Use Inventory, and works with applicants to assure that the targeted density is achieved or exceeded. Opportunities for Energy Conservation The City has adopted a comprehensive Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program to enhance the City's conservation of resources and to reduce 485 environmental impacts of existing and future conditions. This program will allow the City to consider a wide range of programs that will address energy, water, air quality, solid waste, land use, and transportation. Current Regulations and Programs Title 24 Regulations On a regulatory level, the City enforces the State Energy Conservation Standards (Title 24, California Code of Regulations). These standards incorporated into the City's Building Code provide a great deal of flexibility for individual builders to achieve a minimum "energy budget" through the use of various performance standards. These requirements apply to all new residential and commercial construction as well as remodeling and rehabilitation construction where square footage is added. Compliance with Title 24 on the use of energy -efficient appliances and insulation has reduced energy demand stemming from new residential development. Green Building Programs Two prominent green building programs are California Green Builder, recognized by the California Energy Commission, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), which is sponsored by the US Green Building Council. Both programs involve a third -party certification process, have different environmental goals, and apply to different types of development. Green Builder is a voluntary environmental building and certification program for residential construction. Certified homes incorporate water -efficient landscaping and fixtures, utilize high efficiency insulation and ventilation systems, contain environmentally sound building materials, initiate waste reduction methods during construction, and must be 15 percent over existing Title 24 energy efficiency standards. LEED is a national rating system for green buildings. Primarily focused on commercial and multifamily residential projects, LEED requires the developer to register their project with the US Green Building Council, which in turn reviews the project for conformance and assigns points based upon various efficiency, materials quality, and design factors. Once the Council has reviewed the project, it issues a certification based upon the number of points achieved in each category. City Projects The City has undertaken an aggressive series of green building programs that demonstrate the opportunities available to reduce the overall 142 486 environmental impact of new developments. The Title 24 energy efficiency requirements significantly increase the overall energy efficiency of all new construction, and now require photovoltaic systems for residential projects, and will require them for commercial projects in 2030. Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes Located at 78-990 Miles Avenue (just west of Adams Street), the Vista Dunes project consists of 8o affordable courtyard -oriented single-family and duplex homes. This LEED Platinum certified development includes photovoltaic cells to generate electrical power. This feature will annually save $720 per unit in electric utility costs. Water saving improvements will reduce water usage by 1,9oo,000 gallons per year for the entire project. It is estimated that this project exceeds Title 24 by 28 percent. Some of the units will exceed Title 24 requirements by 30 percent or more. At the time of its development, Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes was the first LEED Platinum certified multifamily affordable housing development of its size in the country. The City maintains a photographic history of the project and produced a video for educational purposes. Further, tenants will be educated on energy efficiencies through written materials, a DVD and the project operator, CORE Housing Management. Wolff Waters Place Housing Project This affordable housing development exceeds Title 24 requirements by 24 percent and will save approximately 2,000,000 gallons of water from interior water use alone. Compliance with the CVWD Ordinance will further reduce exterior water use. The project is LEED certified and includes solar hot water for laundry buildings, a transit friendly location with a bus stop and shopping within walking distance, low -water -use landscape and irrigation, dual flush toilets, low -flow water fixtures, energy -efficient lights, ENERGY STAR appliances, recycled building materials, paint with low volatile organic compounds, reduced construction waste, advanced indoor air handling systems, underground parking, high efficiency air conditioning units, and a tenant training program. It also includes an onsite childcare center; for residents using the childcare center, the proximity of the daycare center to housing units reduces vehicle miles traveled and associated greenhouse gas emissions. ,p Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan In conjunction with the adoption of its 2013 General Plan, the City adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. The Plan provides residents, business owners and land owners with a broad range of measures designed to reduce energy use and the use of fossil fuels. The Plan will be effective in reducing costs for existing homes and for new residential development. It will also allow changes in driving patterns, transit use and other measures that will reduce the City's dependence on traditional energy sources. Future City Programs/Actions The City seeks to encourage and enforce regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing. The City should focus on measures and techniques that assist the occupant in reducing energy costs, thereby increasing the amount of income that can be spent on housing, childcare, health care, or other necessary costs. The continued implementation of the City's Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program will require ongoing participation of many city departments and agencies. The program includes the City's adherence to and promotion of green building practices, efficient energy usage, and implementation of conservation measures. The City provides information to developers based on research of best building practices and operational practices, such as commercial recycling programs provided in AB 1826. Program costs could include energy audit upgrades for existing facilities and buildings, irrigation and landscape modifications to City -maintained properties, City fleet vehicles, and City maintenance equipment. The City's 2013 General Plan includes a Livable Community Element that provides direction on building siting, mixed use site planning, and energy reduction techniques. The element also includes a suite of policies and programs designed to lower energy costs, promote healthy living, and encourage high quality design. Under the direction of the City Manager's Office, Community Development and Community Services Department staff plays an instrumental role in educating the community on water conservation programs and resources. Energy Conservation Partners In developing a better La Quinta, the City cannot be successful without a sound relationship with Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling 144 488 Services, Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, SCAG, and other entities. Additionally, many of the areas of concern, such as air quality and regional transportation, cannot be addressed without strong regional, state and federal programs. Utility Programs The City of La Quinta has a strong working relationship with local utility providers, including the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). IID is proactive in creating energy savings via conservation programs, home energy audits, product rebates, and general consumer tips. I I D indicates that an average home owner can reduce energy use by to percent more by taking advantage of IID programs. IID offers rebate programs on the purchase of higher efficiency air conditioning units, the high efficiency refrigerators, and programmable thermostats. Additionally, product rebates are offered on ENERGY STAR equipment such as home and office electronics. IID also offers free in -home energy audits to its residential customers. Other utility programs assist residential customers with energy and water conservation and cost reduction. SoCalGas offers rebates on energy -efficient appliances, incentives for solar thermal water heating, and grants and assistance programs to reduce energy costs. The City works cooperatively with CVWD to promote and enforce, as required, water conservation programs, including those affecting homeowners and home builders. Burrtec offers programs that reduce solid waste and increase recycling opportunities. HOUSING RESOURCES Regional Housing Needs Assessment State Housing Law requires that SCAG identify future housing needs in each jurisdiction. To meet this mandate, SCAG develops the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which establishes both the projected need for housing and the fair share distribution of the projected need to its member jurisdictions. The RHNA calculates the projected new construction necessary to accommodate the anticipated population through October 2029. State housing law requires that cities and counties demonstrate adequate residential sites that could accommodate development of housing to satisfy future housing needs. The 2021 RHNA proposes that La Quinta construct 1,53o new housing units to accommodate housing needs for all income groups during the planning period January zozz through October 2029. These units are distributed by income category as illustrated in Table II-48. According to SCAG, 42o new units are needed to accommodate very low income households. Consistent with HCD methodologies, 50% (210) of these units are assumed to be for extremely low income (ELI) households, and the remaining 50% (21o) are assumed to be for very low income households. A total of 269 new units are needed to accommodate low income households, 297 new units are needed for moderate income households, and 544 new units (provided through market -rate housing) are needed for above moderate income households. The City's 1,53o-unit future housing need is a 6.2 percent increase in the number of existing dwelling units (24,764 in 2019). Table II-48 2022-2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment Household Income Levels Income as a Percent of County Median RHNA Allocation Percent Extremely Low' --- 210 13.7 Very Low Less than 50% 210 13.7 Low 51%-80% 269 17.6 Moderate 81%-120% 297 19.4 Above -Moderate Over i20% 544 35.6 Total 1,530 100% Source: Regional Housing Needs Assessment for Southern California, 2021, prepared by SCAG. ' Extremely Low Income (ELI) category is a subset of the Very Low Income category. ELI households are defined by HCD as those with incomes less than 30% of AM]. The number of ELI units is assumed to be so% of all Very Low Income units. California housing element law allows local governments to obtain credit toward its RHNA housing goals in three ways: constructed and approved units, vacant and underutilized land, and the preservation of existing affordable housing. The City will rely on the construction of new units on vacant lands to meet its housing needs between zozz and 2029. Meeting the Need for Affordable Housing With the loss of redevelopment set -aside funds, the State has limited the City's ability to provide funding for new affordable housing projects. The City, however, continues to be committed to addressing its housing need. 146 490 The City continues to market its land in the Village (sites #2 through #6 in the land inventory, which could produce up to 42 additional units of very low and low income housing. Additional efforts will be made toward expanding housing opportunities in the Highway ill corridor, on lands owned by private parties. Highway ill provides access to jobs, transit, and has successfully integrated the Coral Mountain project, which the City built in the last planning period. To that end, site #13, owned by the City, has been added to the inventory, and is projected to provide 116 units for very low and low income households. The balance of the units, as shown in Table II-51, will be accommodated on multiple sites throughout the City, and will be developed through a combination of private development projects, and public/private partnerships where the City can participate if resources allow. The City has only recently seen an increase in inquiries regarding ADUs, and it is expected that with the latest additions to the Zoning Code (2021) to address changes in State law, that interest will increase. A program has been added to encourage, monitor and reevaluate the demand for ADUs throughout the planning period as a tool to expand affordable housing options for City residents. As discussed earlier in this Element, current conditions in the real estate market make it possible for moderate income households to afford market rate housing. Further, the rental market offers a broad range of units at rental rates, with a median gross rent of $1,473 per month. Table II-49 demonstrates the affordability of market rate rentals and home purchases in La Quinta for a moderate income four -person household. 147 491 Table II-49 Affordability of Housing 2021 Ownership Rental Median Existing Single $386,200 N/A Family Purchase Price Monthly Mortgage $2,047 N/A Costs (PITI) Median Gross Monthly N A / $1,473 Rent 30% of Monthly Moderate Household $2,259 $2,259 Income' Affordability $z�z $786 Gap/Overage ' Per HCD, the annual income limit for a moderate income 4-person household in Riverside County is $90,350. Therefore, the monthly income is $7,529, and 30% is $2,259• As shown in the table, the rental and resale market can accommodate some of the City's expected moderate income households during the 2022-2029 planning period. Available Land for Housing The Housing Element must identify available sites within the City that can accommodate the RHNA. The land inventory includes an analysis of the realistic capacity of the sites. An evaluation of zoning, densities, market demand, record of affordable housing development, and financial feasibility will establish the ability of available sites to provide housing for all income levels. Available Vacant Land The vacant land inventory only includes parcels that the City has identified as having the potential to develop during the 2022-2029 planning period. Additional vacant sites are located in the City but are not assumed to have the potential to satisfy the current RHNA for lower income households. The development potential for Village Commercial (VC) sites is assumed to be improved through logical consolidation with adjacent vacant lots. The City has seen interest in the development of more dense residential projects in the Village, indicating that the development community has an interest and is participating in lot consolidation which could result in additional units in this part of the City. The City will encourage and facilitate lot consolidation in this district through incentives provided in Program H-3.3.b. The City will also continue to consider City -owned lands, not on the inventory, for affordable housing projects in the Village. The City's flexible 148 492 development and use standards further facilitate the development of a range of housing types. The Table also includes 456 units for above moderate income households. These are all associated with approved projects which are expected to develop during the planning period. In addition, existing vacant single family lots are located throughout the City which only require building permit approvals, and two large planned communities are currently in the entitlement process, and would result in more than 2,822 units in the City, as shown in Table III-23. Table II-51 provides a summary of the vacant land with residential development potential within the City. A map showing the parcel locations is provided in Exhibit II-25. As shown on the map, inventory lands are geographically distributed throughout the City and are not concentrated in any areas. As such, they further fair housing principles. The City owns some of the sites shown in Table 11-51. Some of these lots are located in the Village, and are small lots that the City has assembled over several years. The City is marketing the lots as consolidated parcels, and will complete lot mergers (as provided in Program H-1.1.b) to facilitate their sale. Two sites are located in the center of the City, and will be marketed for joint venture with the affordable housing development community. Sites will be offered, consistent with the Surplus Land Act, through Requests for Proposals. Table II-51 includes sites which were in the City's inventory in the prior planning period, but no sites have been included in the inventory for two consecutive previous planning periods. Table II-50 Vacant Land Inventory Map Key APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning Projected Density Projected Yield Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Sites 1 646-07o-o16 13.84 MHDR (RMH 20 28o 2 770156007 0.23 VC VC 14 4 770156010 0.39 VC VC 14 5 77o181oo9 0.36 VC VC 14 5 3 (City Owned) 773078005 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1 773078006 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1 773078007 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1 773078o16 0.12 MC/VC MC/VC 14 2 773078017 0.12 MC/VC MC/VC 14 z 773078034 1.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 15 6 609070053 CG CC (AHO) 22 7 604-032-042 1.88 MHDR RMH 12 zz 8 (City Owned) 600-030-010 2.72 of 11.29 MHDR RMH 19 52 9 600-390-024 15.14 CG CP/CR 18 273 10* 60008000l 0.19 MHDR RM 10 z 600080002 0.19 MHDR RM 10 z 600080003 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080004 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080005 0.19 MHDR RM 10 z 600080006 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080007 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080008 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080009 0.21 MHDR RM 10 2 600080041 2.4 MHDR RM 10 24 11 643-020-025 4.81 CG CR 26 126 12* 600340050 4.46 MHDR RM 8 36 600340051 13.01 MHDR RM 8 104 13 (City Owned) boo ozo 057 6.42 CG CR 18 116 Total Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Sites 1,367 *Moderate income site Above Moderate Income Sites Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning Projected Density Projected Yield 15 Various 40.76 LDR/OS-R RVL/PR 3 90 16 Various 37.43 LDR RL/PR 3 60 150 494 Table II-50 Vacant Land Inventory Map Key APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning Projected Density Projected Yield 17 Various 29.56 LDR RL 3 94 18 Various 20.72 LDR RL 3 57 19 Various 33.07 LDR RL 3 85 20 Various 28.76 LDR RL 3 70 Total Above Moderate Sites 456 Total All Sites 495 MpLisevrz. 70 .............. Igo[ i b2nd AVE SM AW- is 20 16 LEjA 6W WE, ....... ........ 14MVE. ...... .....eve.... Zoning 05 cc CN cd CP CR CT FP GC mc 05 PR RC RH RL RM RMH ROW RVL vc Milos - r -4 My of La QL&TW Gieneml Wan Fxhbit L A TERRA NOVA` inventory Mimp 11-25 La Quintai, Callfomia 152 496 Site Adequacy Analysis The sites shown in Table II-5o, above, all accommodate residential development at various densities. Site 1 is residentially designated, and benefits from the Affordable Housing Overlay, which increases its density potential (please see below). Residential development in La Quinta, particularly that for affordable housing projects, has been built at or near the maximum allowable densities. For example, development in the RM zone generally occurred at the maximum density of 8 units per acre or above through density bonus provisions. Miraflores Apartments were constructed at a density Of 11.2 units per acre in the RM zone in 2003. In 2004, Hadley Villas Apartments were developed at a density of 7.8 units per acre in the RM zone. In 2001, the Aventine Apartments were constructed at a density Of 14.3 units per acre in the RH zone. The City's most recent restricted affordable projects have also been completed within existing residential densities: Wolff Waters Place was built at 14.7 units per acre, the Washington Street Apartments' expansion was completed at a density of 8 units per acre, Vista Dunes was built at a density of 10 units per acre, and the Coral Mountain Apartments were built at a density of 16 units per acre. In order to expand the analysis of realistic capacity, other cities in the Coachella Valley were analyzed. As the area operates as a region, with similar building trends, zoning requirements and land use patterns, an analysis of regional trends is appropriate. The following projects are planned or under construction regionally: Palm Springs: • Monarch Apartments, will provide 6o units affordable to very low and low income households on -3 6 acres, at a density of 17 units per acre. The project is fully funded and will break ground in October of 2021. Palm Desert: • Carlos Ortega Villas, consists of 72 units on 3.48 acres affordable to very low and low income households, at a density of 21 units per acre. • Vitalia, 270 units affordable to very low and low income households on 12 acres approved in 2021, at a density of 23 units per acre. • Millennium SARDA site, 240 units affordable to very low and low income households on 10 acres, under contract in 2021, at a density of 24 units per acre. C*1 Indio: • Arroyo Crossing 1 is currently under construction, and provides 184 units on 6.4 acres affordable to very low and low income households, at a density of 29 units per acre. • Arroyo Crossing z, will provide 216 units affordable to very low and low income households on 7.3 acres, at a density of 30 units per acre. The project was approved in 2021. In the region, projects ranging in density from 17 to 29 units per acre are being funded and can be built to accommodate lower income households. Therefore, the densities for larger projects, ranging from 18 to 26 units per acre, can be achieved in La Quinta. In the past, the City has applied the Affordable Housing Overlay to specific inventory sites which were zoned for non-residential uses. This strategy is being modified (see Program 3.1.a) to apply to all inventory sites, and to increase the AHO density to 30 units per acre, even though, as demonstrates above, affordable housing projects in the region are being built at lower densities. The 3o unit per acre density will be the base on which density bonus provisions will be applied, as described in Program 3.1.a. Units built using the AHO must be affordable to lower income households, unless they are identified as moderate income sites in Table II-5o. As provided in Program 3.1.a, the AHO will allow three story construction (consistent with the existing High Density Residential Zone), and shall be analyzed to assure that development standards are sufficient to allow the 3o unit per acre density. Site z consists of three small lots in the Village, on Desert Club Drive. The three lots have been approved for 14 apartments which are to be affordable to moderate income households. The three lots may be merged by the owner, but can proceed as three lots without further City processes. The owner has been finalizing building plans and construction is expected in zozz. As shown in Table III-49, market rental rates in the City are affordable to moderate income households. Therefore, these units have been included for moderate income households. Three sites in Table II-5o are over to acres in size. Although the State does not believe that these sites can be developed for affordable housing, the Coachella Valley is experiencing development of lower income projects on larger sites, including two projects in Palm Desert described above. Nevertheless, in order to encourage the development of affordable projects on these sites, Program 3.1.a has been added, which provides incentives for subdivision of larger sites. 154 498 Site 6 is one of these aforementioned sites over to acres in size. It is commercially designated and benefits from the Affordable Housing Overlay. The site is 12.74 acres under the City's Community Commercial zoning designation, which allows for multifamily residential development. The property not only allows for multifamily residential but mixed use development as well. The Affordable Housing Overlay allows for a density up to 30 units per acre and mixed use projects allow for density up to 24 units per acre, but this site is proposed at zz units to the acre, more consistent with development in region. The site is within a "High Resource" area, per Exhibit II-14, and its proximity to Highway ill and bordering of a middle school makes it an ideal site. It should also be noted that Site lo, which includes multiple small lots for 42 moderate income units, is an approved apartment project which is being constructed on land previously owned by the City, which was successfully sold to a private developer. The project is expected to be constructed in the next two years. The parcels previously were developed as single family homes, which the City bought to widen Jefferson Street. Upon completion of the widening, the lots were marketed to the private development community, and an apartment project was proposed in 2019, and approved in zozo for the site. The City therefore has experience in the assembly of smaller lots for the successful development of housing. Finally, sites 15 through zo are provided to accommodate above moderate income households. These sites are all located in existing approved communities or tract maps, and require only residential building permits to proceed to construction. Environment and Infrastructure Analysis None of the parcels identified in the vacant land inventory are located in areas of topographic constraint or have known environmental hazards. The sites identified in the vacant land inventory are adjacent to existing urbanized development and are within service hook-up distance of existing water and sewer systems as well as all dry utilities in adjacent streets. All providers have sufficient capacity to accommodate the growth generated by the units listed in Table II-51. According to the latest Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Urban Water Management Plan (2015), the implementation of water conservation, groundwater recharge, and water source substitution management strategies will ensure that adequate water resources are available to existing and future residents of La Quinta. Affordability Analysis It is expected that development of affordable housing units will be accomplished through public -private partnerships, with a focus on two areas of the City: the Village for smaller projects that bring residents into the expanding commercial downtown, and along Highway ill, building upon the success of the Coral Mountain apartments. It is important to note that the sites identified provide a variety of land sizes to allow flexibility in types of projects, and exceed the City's need for very low and low income units, allowing for greater opportunities for a mix of market and affordable units within projects. As described above, the median sales price for a home is approximately $386,2oo and the median gross rent for an apartment unit is approximately $1,473 per month. In comparison, the maximum affordable sales price for a moderate income family of four is $313,650 and the maximum affordable rent for a moderate income couple is $1,8o8 per month. Moderate income households, therefore, can afford to rent in the City and are able to afford homes that are lower than the median price currently. Some moderate income households, especially one and two person households or larger families, will need assistance to purchase a home. The City will continue to work with affordable housing developers to participate in projects and provide streamlining, financial assistance and fee reductions wherever possible. However, it is important to note, as identified by participating affordable housing developers in the City's workshop and outreach, that funding affordable housing projects has been made much more difficult with the loss of local redevelopment funds, and that these developers must identify and secure twice or three times the funding sources that were previously necessary to fund projects. This constraint is one that the City cannot control and cannot alleviate. General proforma analyses were conducted using land costs (average of $448,493 per acre of vacant residential land in La Quinta) and construction costs ($317,074 per unit of affordable housing according to affordable housing developers contacted in the preparation of this Update) to estimate the capacity of land in La Quinta to support affordable housing. The results indicate that homeownership products will remain available to moderate income households without a very large subsidy. The developers of ownership projects require financial returns through the one-time sale of the housing units. 156 500 A generally accepted minimum project size for affordable housing development is 50 units. Like their higher density counterparts, lower density sites able to accommodate 50 units are eligible for funding mechanisms such as Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs), a type of restricted development that must meet strict size and amenity guidelines to compete forfunding. High density is also not a determining factor in obtaining other resources, such as HOME funds and Community Development Block Grant program funding. The RM and RMH sites identified in Table II-50, would both allow a minimum project size consistent with these requirements. Financial and Regulatory Subsidies A subsidy can be financial or regulatory in nature. Financial subsidies are found in federal, state, local, and private programs and organizations focused on the production of affordable housing. Developers in La Quinta use and leverage many sources of financial assistance. Projects may seek funding from LIHTCs, tax-exempt bonds, Community Development Block Grants, HOME funds, other HUD grant programs, and commercial banking resources. Regulatory subsidies can take many forms, including fee waivers or deferrals, flexible development standards, and increased densities. Higher densities generally increase the financial feasibility of a residential project as a developer is able to sell more housing units on the same amount and cost of land (even with slightly lower sales prices associated with smaller, attached units). The City's vision recognizes the importance of providing affordable housing for its residents and employees. Accordingly, the City supports affordable housing development through financial and regulatory subsidies and permits densities up to 24 units per acre with the Affordable Housing Overlay (higher densities are permitted through density bonus provisions). The City is thereby able to achieve both the goal of maintaining lower density community character while also producing its fair share of affordable housing. Vacant Land Opportunities The City has established a strong record of providing assistance to affordable multifamily housing projects (townhomes and apartments), ranging in density from 7.8 to over 20 units per acre. Single-family detached assisted housing was also developed, with City assistance, at densities as low as 4.4 units per acre and up to 7.8 units per acre. 1N 1 La Quinta is able to achieve market -driven moderate income housing through the relative affordability of land, the local market demand for lower maintenance housing types, and reasonable development impact and entitlement fees. La Quinta has a solid record of working with local nonprofits and affordable housing developers to accommodate the housing needs of its lower income residents. The vacant land inventory provides the City and affordable housing developers with a map of opportunity areas. The moderate income housing need can be met without any mixed -use development. However, the City recognizes that mixed -use developments will play a role in moderate and above moderate housing opportunities in the future. Both the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance have been modified to encourage Mixed Use development. The City's efforts to promote mixed use development have had limited success. According to the development community, mixed use projects cannot be financed in La Quinta, due to a lack of such projects in the region. Mixed use properties are therefore not included in this inventory. Fair Housing According to the Fair Housing analysis (see "Fair Housing" section), the City has a low segregation level, no racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, equal access to opportunity, and no disproportionate housing needs. The sites identified above will not exacerbate any such conditions. 158 502 PRESERVATION OF AT RISK UNITS State Government Code requires that localities identify and develop a program for their Housing Elements for the preservation of affordable multifamily units assisted under various federal, state and local programs. In the preservation analysis, localities are required to provide an inventory of assisted, affordable units that are eligible to convert to market rate within five years of the end of the planning period (2034)• Income -restricted housing units sometimes change to market rate due to expiration of subsidies, mortgage prepayments, or expiration of affordability restrictions. An inventory of all assisted multifamily projects is provided in Table II-51. The earliest possible date of conversion for any of the City's restricted multifamily housing stock is 2051 for the extremely low and low income units at Seasons Senior Apartments. There are no at risk units in the City. 503 Table II-51 Assisted Multifamily Project Inventory Earliest Extremely Very Low Moderate Above Project Date of Low Low (80%) (1zo%) Moderate Total Conversion (30%) (50%) (120%+) Aventine Apartments 2056 --- --- 10 10 --- 20 (4775o Adams St) Hadley Villas Senior Apartments 2059 65 12 1 1 79 (78875 Avenue 47) Seasons at Miraflores Senior Apartments 2057 45 71 --- --- --- 116 (47747 Gertrude Way) Seasons La Quinta Senior Apartments 2051 19 --- 37 31 --- 87 (50915 Rainbow Ct.) Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes 2o63 8 64 8 --- --- 8o (44950 Vista Dunes Lane) Washington Street (senior) Apartments' 2o66 24 72 42 2 --- 140 (42800 Washington) Wolff Waters Place Place Dune 2065 43 56 37 8o --- 216 Palms Road) Coral Mountain Apartments 2070 --- 36 138 2 --- 176 (79625 Vista Coralina Lane) Total N/A zoo 311 273 125 1 914 Source: City of La Quinta ' Rental assistance for anyone <_ 5o% AM] or lower Maintenance of the at -risk housing units as affordable will depend largely on market conditions, the status of HUD renewals of Section 8 contracts, and the attractiveness of financial incentives, if warranted. 16o 504 GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS The following goals, policies, and programs set forth a comprehensive housing plan for the City of La Quinta during the 2022-2029 planning period. Adequate Sites for Housing GOAL H-1 Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. ❖ Policy H-1.1 Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. Provide new housing choices by increasing affordable housing supply in higher opportunity areas and throughout the community, and improve housing mobility through encouraging various housing options such as accessory dwelling units and creative housing solutions. Program i.i.a: To address the City's RHNA allocation for extremely low income households,15% of units on the City's land on Highway 111 (site #13) will be assigned to extremely low income households. The City shall negotiate very low income units for all other projects on sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II-50) individually to reach the target of 210 units during the planning period. ■ Timing: June 2025 for Highway 111 project, as projects are constructed for additional units ■ Funding Source: Private Funding, Tax Credit Financing, Other sources as identified ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program l.i.b: The City will merge its parcels in the Village (as listed in Table II-51) to facilitate the consolidation of these lots for sale through the Surplus Land Act. ■ Timing: June 2023 for lot mergers. June 2024 for RFPs and land sales. 161 505 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program ti.c: To encourage the development of housing for extremely low, low and special needs residents, the City will develop a program of incentives for the subdivision of larger sites, to include application fee waivers, DIFfee reductions and expedited processing. The City will contact the owners of the three sites listed in Table II-5o and encourage that they subdivide the land and take advantage of the City's incentive program. ■ Timing: June 2022 for development of program. June 2023 for initial contacts with land owners, and annually thereafter. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Planning Division, City Manager's Office/Housing •'• Policy H-1.2 Focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing. ❖ Policy H-1.3 Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities are provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. ❖ Policy H-1.4 The City shall promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities throughout the community for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, disability, source of income, veteran or military status, or other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code Section 65oo8, and any other applicable state and federal fair housing and planning law. Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing GOAL H-z Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate income households. 162 506 •'• Policy H-2.1 Increase housing choices for lower and moderate income households in areas of higher need and throughout the community. Address disproportionate housing needs and alleviate disproportionate cost burdens on lower and moderate income households by providing more affordable housing units. Program H-2.1.a: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) The City will modify its Zoning Ordinance to comply with State law regarding ADUs and JADUs and provide for the reduced parking standards, setbacks and other incentives included in the law. The City shall establish a program to encourage the building of ADUs and JADUs, with a goal of z new units per year throughout the planning period, and monitor their development to gauge if they are affordable alternatives for housing. The program will include tracking annual permits, an annual survey of rents in ADUs, and whether any ADUs are accepting housing subsidy or restricting their units to very low or low income households. ■ Timing: Zoning amendments June 2022. Monitoring program beginning June 2023. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-2.1.b: City -owned Lots Aggressively pursue development of the City's central -city properties (sites 8 and 13) to generate up to 168 units of extremely low, very low and low income units on these parcels. To implement this program, the City will establish a schedule for Requests for Proposals and include incentives. These incentives may include elimination of Development Impact Fees, financial assistance in the form of land contributions, and density bonuses as provided in the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the City will consider affordable housing for other City -owned lots in the Village when marketing the land for development, including mixed use projects that combine retail and residential uses. Wherever possible, include 15% affordable units in these projects ■ Timing: Annually, beginning with June 2023. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing 107 Program H-2.1.c: Creative Housing Solutions In order to expand the variety of housing options for extremely low and low income households in the City, study, research and pursue the amendments to the Zoning Code and subdivision ordinance that would be required to allow creative housing solutions, including "tiny homes," prefabricated or "kit" homes, shipping container conversions, and other options available in the market as they arise. Present the findings of the research to the Planning Commission and Council for their consideration. This program could generate up to 4 units per year in creative housing solutions. ■ Timing: Research June 2024. Planning Commission and City Council Study Session no later than June 2025. Amendments per Council direction by the end of 2025. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department ❖ Policy H-2.2 Support public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing. Program H-2.2.a: Density Bonus Amendments Revise the Zoning Ordinance to ensure compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 2345 as it pertains to Density Bonus requirements. • Timing: June 2022 regular Zoning Ordinance update • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department ❖ Policy H-2.3 Pursue a variety of forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development of affordable housing throughout the community. Program H-2.3.a: Collaborative Partnerships The City shall continue to meet with affordable housing development entities to discuss types of incentives available and requirements for obtaining assistance, discuss appropriate sites for housing for extremely low, low and special needs residents, and foster professional collaboration between the City and affordable housing stakeholders. This program could result in 2 new partnership projects during the planning period. 164 508 ■ Timing: Project -by -project basis, by request, or on an annual basis. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-2.3.b: Mixed Use in the Highway ill Corridor In order to take advantage of the high density residential permitted in the Mixed Use overlay, develop a menu of incentives, including reduction in development fees, density bonuses and other provisions for the inclusion of affordable housing units in Mixed Use projects within the Highway ill Plan area. This program could result in goo to Soo new units of affordable housing in the Corridor. ■ Timing: Menu of incentives, June 2023. As projects are proposed ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program H-2.3.c: Affordable Housing Renter -to -Owner Transition There are many resources that the City, nonprofits, or for -profit developers may utilize to subsidize the construction and maintenance of affordable housing. This program, in conjunction with Program H-2.3.a, could result in z new partnership projects during the planning period. Some of the most prominent resources are described below. ■ Timing: Update website with funding information and partnership opportunities by June 2022, and every six months thereafter. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Low Income Tax Credits Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low income households. A minimum of 20 percent of the units must be affordable to low income households and 40 percent of the units must be affordable to moderate income households. Community Reinvestment Act The Community Reinvestment Act provides favorable financing to affordable housing developers. The Redevelopment Agency, development community, and local, regional, and national banks are encouraged to work together to meet their obligations pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act. California Housing Finance Agency Program The California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) has three single- family programs for primarily moderate and middle income homebuyers: the Home Ownership Assistance Program and the Affordable Housing Partnership Program. Each provides permanent mortgage financing for first-time homebuyers at below -market interest rates. HOME Funds HOME is the largest Federal block grant distributed to state and local governments for the creation of lower income housing. Cities apply when Notices of Funding Availability are issued. Neighborhood Stabilization Program HUD's Neighborhood Stabilization Program makes emergency assistance grants available to local governments for the acquisition, redevelopment, and renting or resale of foreclosed properties at -risk of abandonment. Riverside County First -Time Homebuyers Program Continue participation in the Riverside County First -Time Homebuyers Program for low and moderate income households. Mortgage Credit Certificate The Riverside County Mortgage Credit Certificate Program is designed to assist low and moderate income first time homebuyers. Under the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, first-time homebuyers receive a tax credit based on a percentage of the interest paid on their mortgage. This tax credit allows the buyer to qualify more easily for home loans, as it increases the effective income of the buyer. Under federal legislation, 20 percent of the funds must be set aside for buyers with incomes between 75 and 8o percent of the county median income. 166 510 Finance Agency Lease -Purchase Program Riverside/San Bernardino County Housing Finance Agency Lease Purchase Program provides down payment assistance and closing costs for eligible households up to 140 percent of the area median income. Housing Choice Voucher (formerly Section 8) Referrals Housing Choice Vouchers allow lower income households to use rental subsidies anywhere in the County, including La Quinta. Program H-2.3.d: Sweat Equity and Shared Equity Continue to work with organizations that offer sweat and shared equity housing programs to lower and moderate income households in La Quinta, with a goal of assisting z to 4 households annually. Sweat equity and shared equity programs provide lower and moderate income households with ownership assistance. Sweat equity refers to the exchange of time and effort, usually in the form of construction activities, for an affordable ownership opportunity. • Timing: Meet with CVHC and Habitat for Humanity annually or more frequently (if requested) to identify opportunities for coordinated efforts or potential housing projects. • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Removal of Governmental Constraints to Housing GOAL H-3 Create a regulatory system that does not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing affordable to all La Quinta residents. ❖ Policy H-3.1 Remove unnecessary regulatory constraints to enable the construction or rehabilitation of housing that meets the needs of La Quinta residents, including lower income and special needs residents. Program 3A.a: All properties listed in the Affordable Housing Inventory for extremely low, very low and low income units shall have the Affordable Housing Overlay applied. Further, the AHO text shall be amended to allow 30 units per acre and to allow 3 story development. The analysis that accompanies the Zone text amendment shall demonstrate that the development standards 6� being applied to the AHO, including setbacks, height and parking requirements, allow a density of 30 units per acre. Consistent with Government Code Section 65583•Z(h) and (i), the AHO will permit owner -occupied and rental multifamily residential use by right for developments in which at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to lower income households during the planning period. These sites shall be zoned with minimum density of 20 units per acre and development standards that permit at least 16 units per site. ■ Timing: October 2022 for Zoning Map and text amendments ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Planning Division ❖ Policy H-3.2 Coordinate the development of affordable housing throughout the community with the provision of key utilities to ensure prompt and adequate service. ❖ Policy H-3.3 Incentivize the development of affordable housing to facilitate the development of housing for the City's lower and moderate income households throughout the community. Program H-3.3.a: Priority Water and Sewer Service Route the adopted Housing Element to the CVWD and notify them of changes and future updates to the Housing Element. In compliance with state law, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) must create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential project. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings, and requires future water management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development. ■ Timing: Upon Housing Element adoption ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, Coachella Valley Water District Program H-3.3.b: Encourage Lot Consolidation Although not on the Site's Inventory, several small lots in the Village Commercial would have improved development potential through lot consolidation. The Village Build Out Plan and Zoning Code amendments have been completed to encourage 168 512 consolidation. The City continues to market its land in the Village, and will also work with private land owners and developers to assemble larger holding to allow multi -family projects which increase the number of residents in the Village. The City will consider potential incentives including fee deferral or reductions, parking requirement reduction, and relief from various other development standards that could potentially increase the cost of the project, resulting in 1 new project per year. ■ Timing: As City staff reviews projects in the Village ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department GOAL H-4 Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties, including targeting areas of higher need and concentration of lower income households. ❖ Policy H-4.1 Protect the quality of La Quinta's neighborhoods through the rehabilitation of both affordable and market -rate homes. ❖ Policy H-4.2 Promote financial and technical assistance to lower and moderate income households for housing maintenance and improvements. ❖ Policy H-4.3 Encourage the retention and rehabilitation of existing single-family neighborhoods and mobile home parks that are economically and physically sound. ❖ Policy H-4.4 Enhance neighborhoods that presently provide affordable housing with drainage, lighting and landscape amenities, and parks and recreation areas, including targeting areas of higher need and concentration of lower income households. Employ government and non -government resources to preserve and revitalize neighborhoods and communities and thereby provide protection against disinvestment -based displacement. 16 Program H-4.4.a: Housing Condition Survey & Monitoring Complete an inventory of housing conditions (updated approximately every five years) to enable the City to properly target Code Compliance and rehabilitation resources. To better understand the City's housing needs the quality and condition of the housing stock must be inventoried on a regular basis. The inventory should focus on older neighborhoods, such as those south of Calle Tampico, west of Washington Street, and north of Highway 111. ■ Timing: Complete by June 2023 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-4.4.b: Habitat for Humanity Residential Rehabilitation Program Complete the Memorandum of Understanding with Habitat for Humanity to implement the "Brush with Kindness" program. The program will be implemented by Habitat volunteers who will donate time for repair and maintenance programs, including yard work, weed abatement, window replacements, roof repairs, and air conditioning repair. Residents will be prioritized to focus on seniors, veterans, the disabled, low and very low income residents, and those in affordably -designated homes. The first -year City contribution will be $40,000, and the annual amounts will be reviewed every year based on the success of the program. ■ Timing: MOU by June 2022, assist 6 households annually through the planning period ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Habitat for Humanity, City Manager's Office/Housing Program H-4.4.c: County of Riverside Home Repair Grant Refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside for home repair grants. The County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Home Repair Program provides lower income households with up to $6,00o for home repairs such as a new roof, new air -conditioner, or a handicap ramp. As a jurisdiction in Riverside County, lower income La Quinta households are eligible for this grant. 170 514 ■ Timing: Throughout planning period, refer 5 households annually ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, City Manager's Office/Housing Program H-4.4.d: Rehabilitation Resources List Provide a rehabilitation resources list on the affordable housing and code compliance pages of the City's website. Use the list, in online or printed form, as a reference for code violators. Lower and moderate income homeowners may need assistance in affording important home repairs and improvements. The City can assist these households by compiling and sharing a listing of local, state, and federal programs offering rehabilitation assistance. ■ Timing: Create list by June zozz. Distribute to 15 households annually. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, Community Resources Department, City Manager's Office/Housing Equal Housing Opportunity GOAL H-5 Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. ❖ Policy 5.1 Provide the regulatory framework to create an environment in which housing opportunities are equal. ❖ Policy 5.2 Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the sale or rental of housing. Program H-5.2.a: Collaborate and coordinate with government agencies (e.g. Fair Housing Council of Riverside County) and nonprofit groups (e.g. Habitat for Humanity) to support outreach and expansion of lending programs for homeownership among minority populations. Advertise workshops and webinars held by these organizations on financial resources for homeownership on Ni the City website, under News page and Directory of Services (see Program H-5.2.c). This program could result in homeownership for 5 minority households annually. • Timing: Annually (June) with adoption of budget, subject to available funding. • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program H-5.2.b: Fair Housing Referrals Continue to refer up to 10 tenants and landlords annually to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. Provide information on fair housing resources on the City's website and at City Hall. Identify and coordinate with local nonprofits, service organizations and community groups that can assist in distributing fair housing information. Fair housing organizations provide dispute resolution and legal assistance to tenants and landlords in conflict. Such services are particularly important for lower and moderate income households unable to afford counsel. ■ Timing: Referral service as needed. Information to be maintained on website ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program H-5.2.c: Directory of Services Maintain the online directory of services and information to provide La Quinta residents with contact information for community organizations and service providers that address special needs. While numerous services are available to special needs and lower income households, it can be difficult to readily have access to these resources. A directory provides the contact information necessary to seek housing assistance. ■ Timing: Update website annually ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing 172 516 ❖ Policy 5.3 Encourage support services for the Coachella Valley's homeless populations through referrals and collaborative efforts with non -profits and other jurisdictions. Program H-5.3.a: Regional Facilities for the Homeless Continue to support and collaborate with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Homelessness Committee efforts to maintain a regional homeless facility that provides housing as well as supportive services. The Strategic Plan created by the Homelessness Committee establishes a continuum of care for the Coachella Valley. ■ Timing: City staff will continue to collaborate with CVAG throughout the planning period and work with the appropriate facilities directly. ■ Funding Source: Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing ❖ Policy 5.4 Assist in the creation of a continuum of care for the homeless population and those transitioning into permanent housing. Program H-5.4.a: Low Barrier Navigation Centers Review and revise, as necessary, the Zoning Ordinance to ensure compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) lol as it pertains to Low Barrier Navigation Centers. Modify the definition of "homeless shelter" to include this use. • Timing: June 2022 at regular Zoning Ordinance update • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-5.4.b: Zoning Amendments for Emergency Shelters, Transitional and Supportive Housing Revise the Zoning Ordinance to require that homeless shelters only be required to provide parking for employees; and that Transitional and Supportive Housing be permitted uses in the Medium, Medium -High and High density residential zones. • Timing: June zozz at regular Zoning Ordinance update • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department 114 ❖ Policy 5.5 Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may create barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design. Energy and Water Conservation GOAL H-6.1 Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. ❖ Policy H-6.1 Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. ❖ Policy H-6.2 Facilitate housing development and rehabilitation that conserves natural resources and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions. ❖ Policy H-6.3 Encourage and enforce green building regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing. ❖ Policy H-6.4 Focus sustainability efforts on measures and techniques that also assist the occupant in reducing energy costs; therefore reducing housing costs. ❖ Policy H-6.5 Use and encourage emerging technologies to reduce high demands for electricity and natural gas including use of passive solar devices and where feasible other renewable energy technologies (e.g., biomass, wind, and geothermal). Program H-6.5.a: Going Green La Quinta Program Implement green goals, policies, and programs that accurately represent the City's direction in resource conservation and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. Implement design standards for residential and commercial structures that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation. 174 518 ■ Timing: As projects are proposed ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-6.5.b: Energy Conservation Partners Continue to meet with and seek insight from utilities, service providers, and other entities involved in energy conservation efforts appropriate for La Quinta. In working toward a sustainable La Quinta, the City and its residents will need to collaborate with utilities and service providers. Partnerships with the Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, Southern California Association of Governments and other entities will be an important component of making La Quinta a more livable city. ■ Timing: As part of regular coordination meetings with utilities ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office, Design and Development Department Program H-6.5.c: Energy Efficiency Programs Investigate all potential energy efficiency programs and provide a list of programs on the City's Going Green website. In addition to programs that may become available through IID, investigate other opportunities, including state and federal incentives, and promote them on the Going Green website. ■ Timing: Ongoing as programs are identified ■ Funding Source: General Fund, I I D program funds, and other programs as identified ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office, Design and Development Department Program H-6.5.d: Weatherization Assistance Encourage low income homeowners or renters to apply for IID and SCG programs, including free energy audits, home weatherization, and utility rebate programs by advertising available programs on the City's website and at City Hall. ■ Timing: Advertise annually as program funds are available ■ Funding: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, City Manager's Office Appendix A Public Outreach Materials 520 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023-XXX EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 1 OF 2 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this General Plan Amendment. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. GPA2022-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 Specific Plan 2022-0001 Site Development Permit 2022-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The applicant requested in its initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the City's Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the City's inventory of sites, as approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in accordance with the City's regional housing need assessment (RHNA) pursuant to Section 65584. Therefore, pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e), the applicant is required to ensure compliance with the state "no net loss" law set forth in Section 65863. 4. Prior to Specific Plan 2022-0001 becoming effective, prior to Site Development Permit 2022-0001 being eligible for approval, and prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the City's update to the Housing Element shall be approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 180 days of approval by City Council of GPA2022-0001. This approval by HCD must include certification of the City's Housing Element after adding "Site 6", as noted in Exhibit A of the Planning Commission Resolution, to the inventory of sites within the City to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the RHNA. If, within 180 days of approval by City Council, HCD does not approve and/or certify the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6," then GPA2022-0001 shall be repealed on its own accord without the need for further action by City Council and Specific Plan 2022-0001 shall not become effective, Site Development Permit 2022-0001 shall not be approved, and no grading, construction, or building permit for the Project may be issued by the City. 521 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0001 ADOPTED: PAGE 20F2 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any dwelling unit, an applicant shall agree to, and the city shall ensure, that the designated 74 moderate -income units are subject to a recorded affordability restriction of 55 years or longer to ensure continued affordability (Affordability Covenant). The Affordability Covenant shall be in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and shall require, among other terms and conditions, eligibility criteria as determined by state law for selecting eligible households, rental limits, annual income verification for current households, and the unit numbers designated as the 74 moderate -income units. The Affordability Covenant shall be binding upon all successors in interest of the applicant and shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder. 6. The property owner shall submit to the Design and Development Department on an annual basis by January 30 of every year a record of rent payments for the 74 designated moderate -income units that meet the Riverside County moderate income rent limits. 522 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX, EXHIBIT C ADOPTED: AUGUST 1, 2023 La Quinta Village Specific Plan La Paloma Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 City of La Quinta Adopted xx,xx, 2023 Resolution Number xxxx Prepared For: Troutdale Village, LLC. 1800 Blankenship Road #325 Linn, Oregon 97068 Prepared BY: Altum Group Rich Malacoff, AICP Heather Boland Jordan Parrish 44600 Village Court, Suite 100 Palm Desert, California 92260 523 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction/Purpose.............................................................................................. 5 ExecutiveSummary.............................................................................................................. 6 TheProcess............................................................................................................................ 6 Relationship to Other Agencies........................................................................................... 7 Relationship to the General Plan......................................................................................... 7 Section2 Specific Plan.......................................................................................................... 10 ProjectDescription...............................................................................................................10 ArtIn Public Places..............................................................................................................1 1 Infrastructure Phasing..........................................................................................................1 1 Grading / Drainage / Flood Control..................................................................................1 1 ErosionControl....................................................................................................1 1 SWPPP / NPDES / PM 10........................................................................................12 Hydrology.......................................................................................................... 12 Flood Control Master Plan....................................................................................12 On -Site Storm Water Design / PWQMP..............................................................................12 NuisanceWater.................................................................................................. 13 Utilities...............................................................................................................13 SewerPlan......................................................................................................... 13 WaterPlan............................................................................................................................13 CVWDWell Site...................................................................................................13 ElectricalPlan.......................................................................................................................13 OtherUtilities.........................................................................................................................14 Section3 Land Use Plan........................................................................................................ 15 LandUse...............................................................................................................................15 DevelopmentStandards.....................................................................................................15 Additional Development Standards..................................................................................17 Specific Plan Minor Modifications......................................................................................18 Specific Plan Amendments...................................................................................18 Modifications to Approved Grading Plan................................................................19 ParkingRequirements..........................................................................................................19 Carportsand Garages........................................................................................................19 524 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 TrashEnclosures...................................................................................................20 Fencingand Walls...............................................................................................................20 Lighting.................................................................................................................................22 Section 4 Circulation Overview.............................................................................................24 Off -Site Circulation System..................................................................................................24 On -Site Circulation System..................................................................................................24 PublicTransportation...........................................................................................................24 Section 5 Design Guidelines..................................................................................................25 LandscapeConcepts...........................................................................................25 ApprovalProcess.................................................................................................26 Development Standards.......................................................................................27 Signage.................................................................................................................................28 General Architectural Theme.............................................................................................28 AdministrativePlan.............................................................................................. 35 Implementation Program..................................................................................... 35 Site Development Permit...................................................................................... 36 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Regional Location Map Exhibit 2 Project Vicinity Map Exhibit 3 USGS Map Exhibit 4 Site Plan Exhibit 5 City Zoning Map Exhibit 6 City General Plan Map Exhibit 7 Image Corridor Exhibit Exhibit 8 Photo Array Exhibit 9 FEMA Map Exhibit 10 Civil Site Plan Exhibit 11 Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit 12 Preliminary Utility Plan Exhibit 13 First Floor Plan 525 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Exhibit 14 Second Floor Plan Exhibit 15 Third Floor Plan Exhibit 16 Roof Plan Exhibit 17 Unit Plans Exhibit 18 Clubhouse Exhibit 19 Bldg. 1 - Elevations Exhibit 20 Bldg. 2 - Elevations Exhibit 21 Bldg. 3 - Elevations Exhibit 22 Bldg. 3 - Elevations Exhibit 23 Bldg. 4 - Elevations Exhibit 24 Bldg. 5 - Elevations Exhibit 25 Bldg. 6 - Elevations Exhibit 26 Bldg. 7 - Elevations Exhibit 27 Bldg. 8 - Elevations Exhibit 28 Bldg. 9 - Elevations Exhibit 29 Bldg. 10 -Elevations Exhibit 30 Bldg. 11 Elevations Exhibit 31 Exterior Elevations Exhibit 32 3D Views Exhibit 33 3D Views & Materials Board Exhibit 34 Line of Sight Diagram Exhibit 35.1 Site Lighting Plan Exhibit 35.2 Site Lighting Plan Exhibit 36.1 Site Photometric Plan Exhibit 36.2 Site Photometric Plan Exhibit 37 Light Fixture Cut Sheets Exhibit 38 Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit 39 Typical Building Planting Exhibit Exhibit 40 Slope Planting Exhibit Exhibit 41 Pool Area Exhibit 42 Entry Exhibit 43 Wall & Fence Plan 526 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 This page intentionally left blank. IV 527 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 1 - Introduction/Purpose The purpose of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, previously known as the La Paloma Specific Plan, is to set forth the detailed development principles, guidelines, and programs to facilitate the development of a 14.03-acre site located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. (Exhibit 2 - Vicinity Map). The project is designed and will be managed as a multi -family apartment project. The community will consist of one- and two -bedroom units with a mix of market -rate and moderate -income units. This Specific Plan proposes development standards for the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 (APN: 646-070-016). This Specific Plan Amendment will replace previous Specific Plans and substitute for the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). Any issue not addressed in the Specific Plan will defer to the La Quinta Municipal Code. For the sake of clarity, the parcel on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 is not part of this Specific Plan similarly as it was in the amended 2011 version of the La Paloma Specific Plan. The 2011 La Paloma Specific Plan removed this parcel from the designated specific plan area and reverted it back to the underlying standards for Residential Medium (RM) zoning. This parcel was previously included within the 2004 Pacific Retirement Services and Westport La Quinta LP (Specific Plan 2004-071). This Specific Plan is intended to meet the requirements for a Specific Plan as set forth in State law and City of La Quinta regulations. The State authorizes cities and counties to adopt Specific Plans, as appropriate, in implementing their General Plans. Such a plan is to include the detailed regulations, conditions, programs, and any proposed legislation that is necessary for the systematic implementation of the General Plan. The Specific Plan provides the linkage between the General Plan (and the general goals and policies of the City) and the detailed implementation of that plan with tools such as zoning ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and the like. The Government Code (Section 65451) sets forth the minimum requirements of a Specific Plan and states: "A Specific Plan shall include a text and diagram or diagrams which specify all of the following in detail: 1. The distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan. 2. The proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described by the plan. 3. Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources, where applicable. 4. A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)." The establishment of specific performance, design, and development standards is set forth to guide the development of the subject property in such a way as to implement 5 528 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 the General Plan while maintaining some flexibility to respond to changing conditions which may be a factor in any long-term development program. The document also acts to augment the City's Zoning Ordinance by providing design guidelines, a tailored list of permitted and prohibited uses for the site, and unique development standards. The site plan, architectural, and landscape illustrations in the Specific Plan establish a design theme with detailed perspectives. These illustrations are conceptual and do not constitute precise pre -construction drawings. Executive Summary La Quinta Village Apartments is a proposed multi -family apartment project located on 14.03 acres on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta (Exhibit 2 - Project Vicinity Map). The General Plan designation of the site is Medium High Density Residential (Exhibit 6 - General Plan Map). The zoning designation is Medium High Density Residential (RMH) (Exhibit 5 - City Zoning Map). The project site fronts Washington Street which is designated by the City's General Plan as a major arterial and abuts Avenue 50 designated as a primary arterial. The site is vacant, generally flat, and has been grubbed and leveled in the past. The site was previously entitled for single-family subdivision in the early 1990's but the entitlements have since expired. Property to the immediate east is the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) evacuation channel. Further east on the far side of the channel is a Sports Complex, the La Quinta Middle School, and single-family residences. Surrounding property to the north is subdivided and mostly developed with single family residences. Directly west across Washington Street is the La Quinta County Club. Property to the south is vacant and zoned for Medium Density Residential. Site photos are illustrated on Exhibit 8 - Photo Array. The project will operate as a multiple -family residential apartments with a mix of moderate -income units (74 Units) and market -rate Units (178 Units). The project will incorporate amenities such as a clubhouse, pool and spa, barbeque areas, pickle ball court, and dog park. (Exhibit 4 - Site Plan). Additionally, the project site will be environmentally responsible and will take steps both during and after construction to ensure minimal impact to the surrounding neighborhood and a positive long-term impact on those who will reside and work at La Quinta Village Apartments. The Environmental Conservation Element of the General Plan identifies the site as having no significant issues constraining the property. The Process The purpose of a Specific Plan is to provide a detailed plan for a selected area within the City for the purpose of implementing the General Plan. The Specific Plan outlines and directs all facets of development for the site. The standards of development delineated in this Specific Plan create a link between the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Implementation of the Specific Plan is intended to carry out the goals and policies contained in the La Quinta General Plan. 6 529 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The project will require approvals from the Planning Commission and City Council for the Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Site Development Permit, Density Bonus Agreement, and the Implementation of Assembly Bill 330. In addition, the City will review the engineering and building construction documents which must also be consistent with the Specific Plan and Site Development Permit approvals. The project and the various applications that are necessary to complete the entitlement process shall be consistent with the City ordinances, policies, and regulations of the City of La Quinta unless otherwise approved within this Specific Plan. Relationship to Other Agencies In addition to the City's approvals and actions, permits will be needed from the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for connection to water and sewer lines. Other infrastructure extensions or connections will be required by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) for electrical power, Frontier for telephone service, Southern California Gas Company for natural gas, and Spectrum for cable TV service. The Coachella Valley Water District controls a portion of the sloped area adjacent to Avenue 50. They control any drainage into the channel and any alterations or landscape of its property. Relationship to the General Plan All development within the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall be consistent with the provisions of the La Quinta General Plan. The proposed General Plan Land Use for the site is shown in Exhibit 6. Among the important provisions of the General Plan that will be implemented upon the development of La Quinta Village Specific Plan include: • Land Use - Medium High Density Residential uses should be located close to park/open space uses such as neighborhood and community parks (such as Saguaro Park), schools (including John Adams Elementary Schools and La Quinta Middle School STEM Academy), or other recreational facilities. • Land Use - Medium High Density Residential Uses can be used to provide transition areas between low density residential uses and high -density commercial uses along arterial roadways. • Circulation - The Circulation Element of the General Plan outlines the design and location of required street improvements to complete the transportation system in the City. La Quinta Village Apartments will complete the unfinished portions of two important links in the City's circulation network: Washington Street and Avenue 50. Potential improvements may include sidewalks, bicycle lanes, bus stops, and signal improvements. • Primary Image Corridors - In addition to roadway improvements, the Project will refine the Image Corridors. Washington Street is identified as a Primary Image Corridor and Avenue 50 is shown as a Secondary Image Corridor. The Specific Plan will modify the height requirements but will maintain the striking 7 530 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 viewsheds that define the City of La Quinta. The 150-foot setback on Washington Street and Avenue 50 are shown on Exhibit 7 - Image Corridor Exhibit. • Water Quantity and Quality -The Specific Plan outlines the use of drought tolerant planting, irrigation techniques, and incorporates a grading concept designed to detain stormwater on -site. • Infrastructure - The Specific Plan incorporates plans to complete the infrastructure that lies adjacent to the project site. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan seeks to establish a well-defined planning framework that implements the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's 2035 General Plan. As a comprehensive development plan, it ensures a cohesive, integrated framework for the development of multiple family housing. This chapter provides a summary discussion to demonstrate that the La Quinta Village Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and that the La Quinta Village Specific Plan results in the implementation of applicable goals and policies included in the City's General Plan. Table 1 - General Plan Consistency Analysis General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Finding Land Use Goal LU-2: High quality design that The La Quinta Village community complements and enhances the city. incorporates high quality desert architectural themes and materials into the building aesthetic. Policy LU-2.4: Planning for all major The proposed residential buildings have been community facilities shall carefully consider broken up and set back from the northern the potential impacts to adjacent property line to reduce the impact of its mass development, particularly residential on the adjoining single-family neighborhood. development. Program LU-2.7a: Continue to utilize the This development will pay the required QUIMBY Act to charge park fees and allow QUIMBY Act fees. for park development. Goal LU-5: A broad range of housing types Providing both market -rate and moderate - and choices for all residents of the city. income rentals fills the need for this type of housing, which is not being satisfied currently. In addition, the variation in apartment size, accessibility, and affordability provides opportunities for a great variety of residents in La Quinta. Housing Policy H-2.1: Increase housing choices for This development will provide 74 affordable lower and moderate -income households. units and 178 market -rate income units which provides more housing options in the City of La Quinta. 8 531 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 General Plan Goal or Policy I Consistency Finding Policy H-6.1: Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. Goal H-5: Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. Policy 5.5: Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may require barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design. La Quinta Village Apartments provides 18 dwelling units per acre while minimizing its impact on the nearby single-family neiahborhoods. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide affordable moderate -income units and accessible units, providing a greater variety of housing types in the City of La Quinta. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide ground floor accessible units. The pool, spa, parking, and other recreational spaces will be compliant with accessibility regulations. Circulation Program CIR 1.1Oa: Review new and redeveloping projects along all major roadways with the intent of limiting access and aligning and/or consolidating access drives in a manner which minimizes the use of existing and planned signalized intersections. Policy CIR 1.12: As a means of reducing vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles travels by traffic originating in the city, the city shall pursue development of a land use pattern that maximizes the interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. Policy CIR 1.17: To preserve the aesthetic values on the city's streets, optimum landscape setback shall be maintained along all designated General Plan Image Corridors and shall be identified in the City's Municipal Code. Access will be provided along a primary and major arterial road. The access points have been designed to minimize interruptions at the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50. Due to the community's proximity to the school, children will be able to walk safely to school. Additionally, La Quinta Village Apartments is near a Sunline route, which will allow its residents to have easy access to public transit services. Both Washington Street and Avenue 50 are image corridors and have a 150-foot setback with a 22-foot height restriction which will be raised to 28 feet to accommodate the number of units allowed by the Density Bonus Law. The viewshed will still provide beautiful panoramic views of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Natural Resources Policy OS 2.3: Encourage the preservation of open space in privately owned development projects. Goal SC-1: A community that provides the best possible quality of life for its residents. La Quinta Village Apartments provides 4.8 to 5 acres of open space areas for its residents, above the minimum required per the city's municipal code. The community will have intricate pedestrian pathways for its residents that provide connectivity throughout the site. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide open space and recreational amenities such as a clubhouse, pool and spa, barbeque areas, putting course, fitness center, and office space. 532 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 2 - Specific Plan Project Description The project site consists of a 14.03-acre parcel located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. The site is currently vacant but has been cleared and grubbed. It was previously approved for the development of a single-family tract of houses (Tentative Tract Map 26148) in the late 1980's and the approval was extended into the early 1990's. However, the entitlements were allowed to lapse. To the north, the project site abuts a mostly built out established tract of single- family homes which are accessed from Washington Street at Sagebrush Avenue. La Quinta Village Apartments is a proposed multiple family residential development that will offer 252-units of which 178 will be market -rate and 74 will be moderate income affordable units. The housing type will be a mix of one- and two -bedroom units with a total of 166 one -bedroom units and 86 two -bedroom units. The project will have two - and three-story apartment buildings with a maximum height of 40 feet with a contemporary Mediterranean architectural design aesthetic. The proposed density is 18 dwelling units per acre, which includes the use of a Density Bonus for Affordable Housing from LQMC Section 9.60.260. In contrast to the City of La Quinta's Zoning Ordinance, this Specific Plan will allow for the moderate -income affordable housing density bonus to be applied without requiring the affordable units to be offered to the public for purchase. The density permitted in the Medium High Density Residential zoning allows for 8 to 12 units per acre. The project amenities will include a dog park, pickle ball court, putting green, swimming pool and spa, barbeque areas, and clubhouse. Inside the clubhouse there will be offices, restrooms, showers, a fitness center, and a community area. This apartment community will be managed by a management company that will develop and enforce all community standards and rules. La Quinta Village will be an environmentally sustainable community that will help facilitate and encourage health and wellness for its residents and employees. The project will create community connectivity through access to public transportation. Recycling within the project using collection bins will also be encouraged. Water and energy efficiencies will be implemented throughout the project by using high -efficiency, low -flow rate plumbing fixtures and Energy Star rated appliances. Architectural features such as colors, materials, and shading devices will also reduce the project's energy demands. Landscaping will meet or exceed CVWD water budget requirements. Parking for the facility is primarily located directly off the perimeter drive along both Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The perimeter drive is proposed to provide fire and safety equipment access and servicing to the complex. The site plan complies with required landscape setbacks on both Washington Street and Avenue 50 and employs a single vehicular access from each street to the site. These standards are consistent with the adopted image corridors regulations established in the General Plan. The site is irregular in shape and the development is constrained by parcel geometry, additional street dedication on Washington to comply with the General Plan, and the city staff 10 533 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 request for additional right-of-way to accommodate a dedicated right turn lane. The project proponent previously dedicated full General Plan Right -of- Way for both streets. The project is within the image corridor of both Washington Street and Avenue 50. The image corridor setback is measured 150 feet from the right-of-way line as defined in the parcel map. Portions of buildings fronting on Washington Street and Avenue 50 are within the 150-foot setback. A detailed discussion of the Image Corridors is included later in the Specific Plan. There is a 75-foot building setback from Coachella Valley Water District Stormwater Channel located to the east of the project site. No buildings are allowed within the 75- foot setback; however, carports are permitted. Art In Public Places The requirement for art in public places will be satisfied in accordance with Section 2.65 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Infrastructure Phasing The infrastructure improvements required in conjunction with this development will be installed and completed prior to occupancy of the facility. All adjacent infrastructure improvements adjacent to the site will be improved with the initial development of the property. Grading / Drainage / Flood Control The site will be mass graded and it is anticipated that there will be a net -import of material to the site. Garage elevations adjacent to neighbors along Saguaro Street range two (2) to three (3) feet lower than the adjacent homes to the north of the project site. Overall, it is anticipated that approximately 36,000 cubic yards of import will be moved to the site. Stormwater, including that from a 100-year event, will be stored in above ground retention facilities. As an alternative, a regional assessment could be undertaken to determine the feasibility of discharging flows into the channel after first flush. To do this, the City and CVWD would have to see an analysis that shows there is adequate capacity in the channel when the subject property discharges storm flows. Due to the adjacent Evacuation Channel, CVWD has noted that the channel water surface elevation is established at 48 feet above sea level. The City Engineer will require that the site development plan and street improvement plans for Avenue 50 are designed and constructed to provide a minimum elevation of 50 feet to prevent flooding. The Conceptual Grading Plan is shown in Exhibit 11. Erosion Control The grading operations shall include adequate provisions for wind and water erosion control both during as well as after grading operations have ceased. The details of erosion control shall be included in the project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and PM 10 Plan. 534 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Pre -watering - The site shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading operations. During Grading - Once grading has commenced, and until grading has been completed, watering of the site and/or other treatment(s) determined to be appropriate shall be ongoing. Post Grading - All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion for the term that the area will remain undeveloped. Final landscape and irrigation shall be installed as soon as feasible after grading operations have been completed. SWPPP/NPDES/PM 10 Since the Coachella Valley experiences periods of moderate to heavy wind conditions, wind-blown dust and sand is a concern with mass grading operations, especially those more than five acres in size. Because of health concerns, the Environmental Protection Agency has instituted a plan in the valley to curb excess small particle dust (PM 10). The City also participates in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program. The City of La Quinta requires SWPPP, NPDES and PM 10 plans to control the wind- and water - born erosion associated with such grading operations. The project will comply with the City's requirements relative to these programs. Hydrology La Quinta Village lies in a Zone X Other Areas flood zone as determined by FEMA, Community Panel Number 06065C-2241 G, revised August 20, 2008. Zone X includes areas to be outside the 500-year event. There are no tributary flows that must be accommodated in the development of the site (Exhibit 8 - Photo Array). Flood Control Master Plan The stormwater drainage system in the City of La Quinta is administered by CVWD. The system consists of improvements to the natural drainage channels that run through the city. There is an existing storm drain located in Washington Street that collects storm water and conducts that flow into the adjacent Evacuation Channel via a storm drain in Avenue 50. Water collected in this channel then feeds into the Whitewater River and to the Salton Sea. On -Site Storm Water Design / PWQMP The City of La Quinta in conjunction with CVWD requires each development to include provisions for handling storm water attributed to the site. The design storm, which creates the worst -case scenario is a 100-year, 3-hour event. Each development project must either retain the 100-year stormwater on site or discharge it into an approved storm water system after first flush containments have been removed. The initial storm water design concept for the La Quinta Village Apartments is to retain the storm water on -site in above -ground basins. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be submitted as part of the Site Development Permit, showing how the first flush containments will be collected and removed from the storm water prior to percolation or dewatering. 12 535 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Nuisance Water Nuisance water attributed to the project will be collected and directed to the above- ground retention basin areas if this is the final method chosen for handling stormwater. If a direct discharge approach is proven feasible, nuisance water will be directed to one or more dry wells if needed. The amount of nuisance water is expected to be reduced due to the use of water efficient landscape and irrigation materials. Utilities La Quinta Village Apartments is well served by utilities and is situated in a corridor planned for a relatively intense scope of urban development. Utility extensions will be minimal with most utilities existing at the perimeter of the site. Some upgrades will be required by the individual utility companies providing service to the property. Several overhead utility lines exist along Washington Street, Avenue 50, and along the Evacuation Channel. It is the intent of the development to underground all the adjacent overhead utility lines except for the transmission lines along the northern property line and the transmission lines following the alignment of the channel, as required by the City of La Quinta, and regulated by the Imperial Irrigation District (Exhibit 12 - Preliminary Utility Plan). Street improvements implementing the project's conditions of approval will be installed concurrently with the construction of the project and will be completed prior to occupancy of the facility. Sewer Plan Sanitary sewer facilities for La Quinta are provided by CVWD. Sewer mains are located on the west side of the site in Washington Street, in Avenue 50, and in the Evacuation Channel at the southeast corner of the site. Sewage will flow by gravity to the main. No upsizing of facilities will be required. The on -site sewer system will be private (Exhibit 12 - Preliminary Utility Plan). Water Plan Water facilities for La Quinta are provided by CVWD. An 18-inch main exists in Washington Street and there is also an 18-inch main in Avenue 50. The on -site water lines will be connected into the existing infrastructure network in at least two places to avoid "dead- end" lines. CVWD Well Site No well site is required for the property. The nearest well is located outside the site near the northeast corner of the project. Electrical Plan The Imperial Irrigation District (IID) provides electric facilities in the City of La Quinta. IID indicates that the design of the electrical service will depend on final load calculations for the overall project. IID will require the installation of underground facilities throughout 13 536 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 the project. Existing power poles located on Washington Street and Avenue 50 may be undergrounded if practical and allowed by IID. Other Utilities Natural gas is provided by the Southern California Gas Company. The nearest facility is a 6-inch line located in Washington Street. The project site will independently connect into the gas line. Television cable service is provided by Spectrum Cable with the nearest facilities located in Washington Street at Saguaro Drive abutting the site. Landline Telephone service will be provided by Frontier Communications. Facilities exist in both Washington Street and Avenue 50. Frontier expects to serve the project from these locations. Waste disposal service is provided by Burrtec Waste Industries. The project also proposes implementing recycling facilities within the project using collection bins and instructing occupants and employees to use. Waste and recycling materials will be deposited by residents at various locations throughout the site. Burrtec will collect the refuse and recyclables. 14 537 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 3 - Land Use Plan Land Use The land use designation for the site is Medium High Density Residential (RMH). This designation allows multi -family housing. Development Standards The development standards outlined in this document are specific to this development and may differ from the La Quinta Municipal Code. The uses and development standards will be in accordance with the provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code and General Plan regulations. Should conflict occur between the regulations and the Specific Plan, the provisions of the Specific Plan and supporting text shall prevail. Any matter not addressed in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall defer to the La Quinta Municipal Code. Residential Permitted Uses Apartments/condominium for multi -family housing. Including the following: garages, carports, patio covers, decks, gazebos, outdoor terraces, fences and walls, clubhouses, swimming pools and spas, cabanas, barbeque, passive and active recreations such as picnic tables, pickleball and tennis courts, community gardens. Guesthouses, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Junior Dwelling Units subject to LQMC 9.60.090 or applicable change in State Law. Congregate Care Facilities are only permitted subject to the rules and regulations of the State of California. Home Occupation Permits subject to LQMC 0.210.060 Child Day Care or Family Day Care Facilities as an accessory use, serving 6 or fewer children, subject to LQMC 9.60.190. Licensed Service Animals or in -training are exempt. Utility Facilities such as water, sewer, cable, electricity, and gas are permitted uses. Telecommunication facilities will be allowed subject to LQMC 9.170 Residential Prohibited Uses Kennels and Catteries Keeping of barnyard, wild, exotic, reptiles, and dangerous animals. Agriculture Uses except for community gardens Storage, parking, maintenance of recreation vehicles or mobile homes. Maintenance of autos and trucks. Single Family Residential Dwellings as a Primary Use 15 538 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Residential Development Standards Minimum Project Size for Multi -Family Projects 20,000 SQ. FT. Minimum Frontage for Multi -Family Projects 100 Feet Maximum Structure Height 3 40 Feet Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 3, a 28 Feet Maximum Number of Stories 3 Minimum Front Yard Setback 20 Feet Minimum Interior/Exterior Side Yard Setback 1, 2,7 5/10 Feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 Feet Minimum Garage Setback 5 Feet Maximum Lot Coverage 60% Minimum Common Open Area 5 30% Minimum/Average Perimeter Landscape Setback 10/20 Feet Minimum Livable Area 6 670 SQ. FT. General Notes: 1 Parking and carports are permitted within front, interior/exterior side, and rear setbacks. 2 To avoid monotony on the street side -yard, buildings can extend into the setback area if the average of 20 feet is maintained. 3 Only residential and commercial structures are included in the height restrictions. Potential utilities facilities such as water, sewer, cable, electricity, phone, cell, and gas are not included. 4 The maximum structure height equals 28 feet for all buildings within 150-feet of any general plan -designated image corridor. Height restriction shall not include roof -mounted equipment screening and parapet walls. 5 Common open area equals percent of net project area. Perimeter landscape setback are adjacent to perimeter streets: first number equals minimum at any point; second number equals minimum average over entire frontage. 6 Excludes garage and private open space. 7 For interior side yards, if the building is over 17 feet in height, the setback is 5 feet plus 1 foot for every foot over 17 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum of 10 feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or a combination of at grade and airspace above the 17-foot building. Density Calculations: The density used for the calculation refers to Medium High Density Residential standards and Density Bonus allowances for moderate -income affordable units respectively, LQMC Section 9.30.070 and Section 9.60.260 (G) (4). Calculation: RMH Density Allowed = 12 du/ac Acres = 14.03 12 du/ac x 14.03 acres = 168 Total Allowable Units (Base) Percentage of Density Bonus = 50% New Density = 18 du/ac 18 du/ac x 14.03 acres = 252 Maximum Allowable Units with Density Bonus 16 539 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Percentage of Moderate -Income Units = 44% 44% moderate -income percentage x 168 base units = 74 Minimum Required Moderate -Income Units Breakdown of Units: Market Rate Units 178 Affordable Units 74 Total Number of Units = 252 The calculations for the gross area shall include all dedicated lands for right-of-way, drainage, retention basins, and utilities. This gross area shall be used to calculate the gross density for the property. Note: The Specific Plan will allow the use of the Density Bonus for rental units in addition to home ownership, which is currently allowed per the La Quinta Municipal Code regardless of affordable income level. Additional Development Standards General Requirements: A. Architectural projections such as roof overhangs, chimneys, awnings, and canopies may encroach a maximum of two feet into any required setback provided such projections are no closer than three- and one-half feet from any property line. B. Roof structures not associated with living area such as parapet walls, air conditioners, chimneys, and other such structures shall not be included in the measurement of height. Only parts of the building that are directly related to living area shall be part of the height calculation. Height shall be measure from finished grade. C. Masonry walls and/or decorative fencing a maximum of six feet in height shall be used along the perimeter of the property and along public streets within perimeter landscaping setbacks. Ornamental iron and tubular steel fencing is permitted to be used in any location on the lot. D. Parking shall be screened from public views on the street frontage by use of walls, fences, landscaping, or decorative berms. E. Roof mounted utility and mechanical equipment including, but not limited to, air conditioning and heating shall be screened and an integral part of the roof design. Screening parapets will be a maximum of five feet. Ground mounted utility and mechanical equipment may be located within setback areas and shall be screened with, but not limited to, landscape planting, walls, and fencing. F. Architecturally integrated parapets to screen roof equipment shall not be included in the building height. G. For multi -family residential, the minimum livable area shall be 670 square feet. 17 540 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 H. Parking, carports, pickleball court, and dog park are permitted to be located within setbacks. Specific Plan Minor Modifications The following constitute minor modifications to the Specific Plan not requiring a Specific Plan Amendment and are subject to review and approval by the Design and Development Director. The Design and Development Director shall have the discretion to refer any such requests for modification to the Specific Plan development standards using the criteria found in the La Quinta Municipal Code Sections 9.200.90 or 9.200.110: • Change in utility provider. • A maximum shift of ten percent (10%) of the total number of various unit types provided the total number of units or density for the entire Specific Plan area does not exceed that established in the Specific Plan Amendment. • Minor changes to development standards can be approved by the Development Services Manager or their designee subject to LQMC Section 9.210.040. • Minor changes to the landscape materials, wall materials, wall alignment, entry design, and streetscape design, which are consistent with the conceptual design set forth in the design guidelines, contained within in the Specific Plan. • Minor changes to the design guidelines, which are intended to be conceptual in nature only, and are intended to be flexible in implementation. • Other modifications of similar nature to those listed above, which are deemed minor by the Planning Manager, which are in keeping with the purpose and intent of the approved La Quinta Village Specific Plan and which are in conformance with the General Plan. • Changes in site plan due to requirements from the electrical, phone, gas, sewer, or water purveyor. o Building changes from these types of changes can be approved by the Design and Development Director if it does not include more than seven (7) buildings on site and do not exceed the maximum height allowed. Prior to the Design and Development Director making a written determination as to the substantial conformance of a revised plan in accordance with the standards set forth in the approved La Quinta Village Specific Plan, the applicant shall prepare a written request that addresses the nature of the revisions and how the revised plan complies with the adopted Specific Plan standards. The applicant's request shall be accompanied by appropriate graphic and/or technical information that supports the revisions. Specific Plan Amendments Amendments to the La Quinta Village Specific Plan may be requested by the applicant by submitting the Specific Plan Amendment Application to the Design and Development Department with the required fees as required by the City Council. The request must comply with Section 65453(a) of the California Government Code and Chapter 9.240 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Amendments shall be processed pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code for Specific Plan Amendments. In the event the 18 541 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 proposed amendment requires supplemental environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant(s) are responsible for preparing the necessary CEQA documentation. Any amendment will be subject to a public hearing requirement for which a 500-foot radius notification of the public hearing will be required or will need to comply with the public hearing notification requirements of Section 9.200.100 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, whichever is the greater requirement. Modifications to Approved Grading Plan Final grading may vary from the project's approved Site Development Permit within the following restrictions: Finish grade elevations may vary by up or down .5 feet within the first 50 feet adjacent to the northerly property line and 1.0 feet up or down elsewhere on the site. 2. Final grading plans may be altered due to minor changes in building configuration, door locations, parking lot revisions, CVWD requirements and changes in ADA paths of access. Parking Requirements The Specific Plan allows standards to be different from those found in the City's Municipal Code. However, California Government Code Section 65915 does mandate specific parking standards when providing affordable units. Within the City's Municipal Code Section 9.60.260 (K), the By -Right parking incentive and parking ratios apply to the entire development and is not restricted to only the affordable units. The parking ratios are listed as follows: 1-bedrooms require 1 parking space per unit and 2-bedrooms require 1.5 spaces per unit. Although only 295 parking spaces are required per code, the minimum total parking spaces will exceed the number required. For the Community Center, 1 parking space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area shall be provided. The parking required for each unit will be sufficient for guest parking and encourage other modes of transportation. In addition to satisfying the required parking minimums, La Quinta Village Apartments will provide 218 extra parking stalls. Provision of future electric vehicle charging station connections is recommended and may be installed at a future date or as mandated per California Green Building Code (CalGreen). Carports and Garages In La Quinta Village Apartments, carports must have relatively flat or shed roof and be made of metal to endure the harsh desert environment. Carports should be complementary to the architecture of the apartment buildings. For the safety of residents, the carports shall have lighting. All electrical conduits shall be screened from public view. Carports should be placed as close to the corresponding building as possible for the convenience of the future residents if parking stalls are assigned. 19 542 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The design of garages should also complement the architecture of the buildings with a similar roof and have a sectional garage door. For the safety of the residents, the garages shall have exterior lighting and all electric conduits shall be screened from public view. h a Lob Trash Enclosures Trash enclosures shall comply with LQMC Section 9.100.200 in addition to the following standards outlined in the Specific Plan. Trash enclosures shall be placed in locations to be approved by the City of La Quinta and Burrtec Disposal to ensure the facility is accessible and secure. The location shall be outside public view as much as possible and be enclosed by block walls with metal gates and a pedestrian entrance. The walls of the trash enclosure shall complement the building in color and material. Fencing and Walls The function of walls and/or fences in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan will be to provide safety, security, and privacy to all the tenants. All fencing shall compliment the architecture and landscaping on -site. Block walls and fencing in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall comply with LQMC Section 9.60.010 and the following: • Maximum height of 6-feet except for tennis/pickleball courts may be 16-feet. • Block Walls are the preferred barrier along the perimeter of the Specific Plan area, however, wrought iron or tubular steel fencing is also appropriate. For purposes of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, tubular steel and wrought iron shall be considered the same. • In areas where existing masonry walls are present and in good condition, the walls will be stuccoed and painted to match. In areas where there is either no wall or fence, a new six -foot -high masonry wall will be erected as indicated by landscape plans. • A minimum six -foot -high decorative masonry wall will be necessary along both public streets to reduce the noise levels impinging on the residential uses. 20 543 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 • If wrought iron fencing is used as perimeter fencing on Washington Street and/or Avenue 50, the wrought iron fencing shall have the rungs facing inward as shown in the picture on the previous page. The decorative top to the fence shall be a spear or similar decoration on the top of the fence. These items are to make it more difficult for trespassers and/or those with nefarious intentions to climb the fence. • To provide surface relief on both wrought iron and block walls, there shall be a decorative pilaster placed no more than 40-feet apart and at each corner or turn. • Every wall off -set or corner turn shall have a matching pilaster. • Block walls shall be composed of masonry block with a decorative cap and matching grout. • Gates shall be aesthetically pleasing and automatic as opposed to manual. Gates shall have a Knox Box or other means of access for police and fire emergencies as approved by the Riverside County Fire Department. • The use of vinyl, wood, wire, chain link, serpentine, and barbed wire fences are strictly prohibited and shall not be used anywhere on -site. • Chain link fencing shall only be allowed for use around the perimeter of pickle ball and/or tennis courts. • Fencing shall be allowed to be within perimeter landscaping setbacks and around above -ground retention basin areas. 21 544 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Lighting All on -site lighting shall comply with LQMC Section 9.100.150 and the following: • Lighting within the project site boundaries shall be complementary to the buildings and consistent with the scale and character of the project. • The adjoining properties shall be protected against glare of lighting fixtures and be designed to provide safety to the future residents. • Brightly colored and/or blinking lights are not allowed. • The location, design, type, and size of all exterior lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta Planning Department and the Riverside County Sheriff Department. • A photometric plan with lumen intensity (candle -feet) and specification sheets that detail the material used will be required. Lighting on the property will be 1- candle-foot on site and 0-candle-foot at the property lines. • All lighting at the property line shall have back -flow screens to prevent spillover to the adjacent residential properties • All building mounted lighting shall be firmly attached to the building and shall not be capable of pivoting or being moved. When mounted on buildings adjacent to surrounding properties, lighting shall also be focused down directly on the ground to avoid spillover to adjacent properties. • All freestanding lighting in the parking area shall comply with the following: 1. The lights shall be contained lights with either a rounded fixture or shoebox fixture. 2. Lighting shall be focused directly down to prevent spillover to adjacent properties. 3. The total height of any freestanding fixture shall not exceed 18-feet and shall have a metallic post. 4. The post shall connect to a concrete base with a beveled edge and decorative surface. Under no circumstance shall the base have the marking from the container that the concrete is formed in. 5. All connections between the pole and the base shall have a metal box screening the connection. 6. Lighting fixture placement shall provide the appropriate illumination for outdoor areas such as parking and pedestrian walkways. 7. The lighting level shall have the number of candle -feet that allows face recognition from 100-feet. 8. Use of illuminated bollards for walkways is recommended. 22 545 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 9. Untreated bollards with rolled concrete are unacceptable and will not be allowed. Yellow bollards shall only be used when required by law but shall not have rolled concrete at the top of the bollard. 10. Whenever possible, bollards shall be used as a light fixture to enhance safety and provide additional amenity. Bollards not used for lighting shall have a decorative cover. •. .Ip IL a � 1 23 546 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 4 - Circulation Overview The La Quinta Village Specific Plan proposes to develop the adjacent street system in a manner consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. The property is located on Washington Street which is designated by the General Plan as a major arterial requiring a half street of 64 feet. The site also abuts Avenue 50 which is designated as a primary arterial for which the General Plan calls for a half street of 54 feet. Off -Site Circulation System The existing conditions around the site include partial improvements on both abutting public streets. The General Plan standards for improvements, which will be required in conjunction with this project, are consistent with other recent road improvements for both Washington Street and Avenue 50. The construction of the required improvements will continue the process of implementing the adopted General Plan Circulation Plan. Expanded pavement, curb, gutter, median and sidewalk/bike path improvements are planned for the project's two street frontages. Signal upgrades may be required in addition to relocation to the ultimate improvement location. On -Site Circulation System The 14.03-acre site will be serviced by the main access on Washington Street and a secondary access on Avenue 50. The internal circulation is a driveway around the perimeter of the site which will have no dead -ends. The design also provides easy access for fire department and trash collection access to all buildings. Public Transportation A bus turnout and a relocated bus shelter on Washington Street is required as a part of the project's public street improvements per Sunline Transit requirements and Public Works Department. Prior to issuance of building permits for individual Site Development Permits, applicants shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan to the Public Works and Design and Development Departments. The plans shall address capital improvement and operational standards as set forth in the City's TDM Ordinance. Any transit related improvements required by the Sunline Transit Agency as a condition to development will not constitute compliance with the plan submittal requirements. 24 547 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 5 - Design Guidelines Landscape Concepts This section of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan contains development standards, design concepts, guidelines, and special treatment plans for the implementation of landscaping throughout the site. The landscape material chosen shall be compatible with the desert climate, water efficient, and compliment the character of the surrounding community. A preliminary landscape plan can be seen below in Figure 2.4 Landscape Plan. Figure 2.4, Landscape Plan 25 548 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The landscape plan found in Figure 2.4 is conceptual and shall be approved by the Planning Commission via the Site Development Plan (SDP). The final landscape plan shall be approved by the Design and Development Director or his/her designee and shall be designed to perform the following functions: 1. Landscaping shall be in scale with adjacent buildings and be of an appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended purpose. 2. Provide a functional and aesthetically pleasing appearance. 3. Landscaping shall be used to compliment the building architecture. 4. Landscaping shall comply with AB 1881 Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and LQMC Section 8.13. 5. Provide a visual buffer of buildings from adjacent properties. 6. Provide landscape material that will provide shading and complement the architecture. 7. Provide an attractive and well-defined entrance and street frontage that will define the project. 8. Street frontages shall be consistent with the surrounding area. 9. Provide dust and erosion control during construction and natural color soil binder with native seasonal flowers to be used between phases with a 3-year life to be replaced when needed. 10. Landscaping shall be used to screen undesirable views. 11. Preserve and protect the special attributes of the area and minimize adverse effects on the natural environment to the greatest extent possible. Approval Process 1. The conceptual landscape plan shall be approved by the City Council along with the Specific Plan and Site Development Permit. 2. The final landscape plan with all planting and irrigation details shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. a) The final landscape plan shall include any direction provided by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. b) The Planning Manager can make minor changes to the landscape plan including moving of landscape areas or changes in species. c) Any appeals can be made subject to the appeal process on page 32 of this document and found in LQMC Section 9.200.1 10. 26 549 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Development Standards 1. Selected plant material shall be low maintenance and drought tolerant. 2. Plant materials shall be water efficient. 3. Landscape areas shall have decomposed granite, ground cover, crushed rock, boulders, and turf. The use of turf shall be limited by the requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District. 4. Plants are to be grouped with plants with similar needs and irrigation requirements for efficiency and optimal growth. 5. Desert friendly trees with canopies shall be planted throughout the site to provide shade to uncovered parking and outdoor gathering areas. 6. The canopy trees shall be a mixture of trees of different sizes such as 15-gallon and 24-inch box. The use of 15-gallon trees shall not exceed 50% of the total number of canopy trees used on site. 7. Trees shall be planted no less than 10 feet on center to avoid crowding and overlapping of canopies. 8. All trees shall have an adequately sized planting area. Parking area planters shall be a minimum of 5 feet x 5 feet and be clearly shown on the final landscape plan. 9. All landscaping shall be within planters bounded by a curb at least six inches high in the parking area. 10. Root barriers shall be used when trees are planted within 5 feet of pedestrian walkways and buildings. 11. The parking lot area will be landscaped with one tree per 4 parking spaces except for where carports are located and the frontage along Washington Street. All trees shall be 24-inch boxes. 12. All canopy trees shall be double staked to prevent swaying and shifting, which can damage the roots underground by breaking them. Palm trees are not required to have staking. 13. Plantings such as trees and/or shrubs shall not obstruct views for safety and security purposes and shall not interfere with fire equipment access. 14. All trees, shrubs, and ground covers must be properly maintained. All dead or dying plants shall be replaced within 10 days of being reported to the property owner. Maintenance for seasonal planting will be required in the off season to remove all dead or frost damaged growth, leaf litter, or other debris. Irrigation systems must be maintained to ensure survivability of plant material. 15. All landscaped areas shall be designed so that plant materials are protected from vehicle damage, encroachment, or overhang. 16. Concrete mow strips shall be used between different types of planting material or different colors of decomposed granite. 27 550 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 17. Use of redwood headers, metal dividers, and rubber tubing as a separation between planting materials is strictly prohibited. 18. The spacing of shrubs shall be appropriate to the species that is used. 19. Plant material shall not interfere with designated emergency areas, fire equipment, or electrical transformers. 20. Decorative gravel/crushed rock/ and/or decomposed granite may also be used as groundcover. The maximum size of decomposed granite shall be 3/8 - inch which ensures a variety of sizes. The gravel can be composed of rubble or cobble and should have a range of 4-6 inches diameter. 21. Maintenance of landscape shall be the responsibility of the property owner and shall be performed according to proper horticultural standards. 22. Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the installation of additional landscaping and the planting of additional trees which can be approved by the Planning Manager. 23. The perimeter landscaping setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet or be an average of 20 feet, including Washington Street and Avenue 50 frontages. Fencing and landscaped retention basins shall be allowed to encroach into the perimeter landscaping setbacks. The landscape concept follows a "lush oasis" theme while emphasizing water efficient materials, colors, and form. A planting palette is shown in Exhibits 37-41. Entry areas are treated with a formal layout of Date Palms, Palo Brea, and Mulga Trees that frame the entrance. Perimeter areas are treated with Indian Rosewood and Tipuana Tipu trees. The landscaping around the buildings will be Tipuana Tipu, Swan Hill, and Mulga which complement the architecture of the buildings. In general, the proposed landscaping will create an attractive street frontage and a pleasing environment for future residents. Signage Project identification signs are anticipated at each entry. The signage will be consistent with the City of La Quinta sign ordinance. Such signs shall be architecturally integrated with the wall and landscape designs and limited to one project identification sign on each frontage with no more than 24 square feet of sign face per sign. Other minor signs will be consistent with city or state/federal requirements. See Exhibit 42 - Entry for the main project (monument) sign. General Architectural Theme La Quinta Village Specific Plan will provide multiple family dwelling units and will endeavor to provide a welcoming atmosphere with open space to avoid the feeling of high bulk and density. The architecture will support this goal and provide a pleasant atmosphere for future residents of La Quinta Village Apartments. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan will include the following policy statements to support the goals of the City's General Plan and La Quinta Village Specific Plan: 1. Provide clean and crisp architectural forms and materials. 28 551 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 2. Indoor/outdoor spaces will blend with the landscape shape. 3. Provide the use of natural materials and colors to be reflective of the dramatic desert surroundings. 4. Architecture and Landscaping will complement each other and create a pleasant environment. 5. Maintain the Image Corridors on both Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The Image Corridors on Avenue 50 and Washington Street are measured 150-feet from the right-of-way line as indicated on the parcel map and as shown on Exhibit 7. On Washington Street, building 5 is within the 150-foot image corridor setback. Building 5 is a 2-story building and extends approximately 18 feet into the setback. In the final analysis, the view of the Santa Rosa Mountains is not impacted since they are to the north and west of the project site and are most impacted by the buildings on the other side of Washington Street. Therefore, this project has no impact on residential or vehicular views from Washington Street. Exhibit 33, View 8 confirms there is no impact on the view from Washington Street. On Avenue 50, Buildings 5 and 6 are entirely within the 150-foot setback and within this Specific Plan allowable height requirements. Exhibit 33 shows Views 8, 9, and 10 that have the views from both Washington Street and Avenue 50. Views 8 and 9 show the impact of Avenue 50 from Buildings 5 and 6. A minuscule amount of the Santa Rosa Mountains view may be blocked, but the view will still be visible for people driving from the west. Notably, this view will mostly be impacted by other unrelated projects to the west. These renderings make it clear that the beautiful views of the Santa Rosa Mountains will still be visible. La Quinta is known for its stunning views and this project will not interfere with those views. Therefore, the Specific Plan will allow a maximum height of 28 feet within the 150-foot Image Corridor. It will only apply to this property and not anywhere else in the City of La Quinta. Preserving the viewsheds is desirable to the developers of this Project because they will make it more desirable to future tenants. Creating more multi -family housing will benefit the City of La Quinta, the Coachella Valley, and Riverside County by helping to alleviate the housing crisis that we all face. La Quinta Village Apartments consists of two and three-story multiple -family dwelling buildings with a contemporary Mediterranean architectural style expressed with stucco finish, parapet walls, flat roofs, horizontal banding, crown molding, stucco reglets, and metal railings. Exterior color schemes convey a desert contemporary palette with contrasting stucco accent colors. The gated site also includes a clubhouse, garages and carports, open space with meandering walking paths, several shade structures with barbeques and picnic tables, a putting green, pickleball court, dog park, and a pool 29 552 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 area with a spa, cabanas, fire pits, and barbeques. Renderings of the proposed project are below. Figure I - Clubhouse pool area (left) and shade structure (right). Figure 2 - Primary entrance on Washington Street. View of the clubhouse to the for right. The architectural site plan has a main access on Washington Street and a secondary access on Avenue 50. The clubhouse and pool will be placed at the terminus of the Washington Street entrance with four (4) buildings surrounding it. The remaining seven (7) 30 553 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 buildings will frame the remainder of the property. The garages and carports are placed strategically along the northern and eastern perimeter of the property and other locations throughout the site so that each building has convenient parking. The clubhouse, pool, cabanas, and putting green are at the center of the property. The dog park and pickleball courts are located on the south side adjacent to Avenue 50. Figure 3 - Rendering of entrance on Avenue 50. Scrror a , Ww m 2 S4;tw rq a Oi'r �Fa paT — a r a*a pw�1W, O.Y�l1[r W.tirap oeori; N Om a ai rr iy om x amr or au� 5KN Gr,, ft h/- e✓'W�rr a. T-YF.r Eop..s w r+rvny. Anse - 6- Arm - &- CE f}F0 CE i7F7 4E dJY! bb_d1Y F- LTecaYr - F- rr:ar 0 �rc.ti issati n! mr dEr arr EE Nra• EWrw[4w PoarkTa+l.n The garages will match the buildings' contemporary Mediterranean architecture style with alternating color schemes. The fronts will have an overhang with supports which will provide surface relief to the building. The rear and side will have stucco reglets. The front 31 554 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 of each garage will have access for 5-cars with individual spaces for each car. The sectional overhead garage doors will have three to five sections. EiiEk�R 60KF. T R. PER SIDE PLAN. EXTERIOR LI6j TYP_ Figure 4 - Typical front elevation of garage. Garages are located on north side of property. Carports sizes will vary and will have support columns with flat metal roofs. The carports will be metal so that they can weather well in the harsh desert environment. Figure 5 - Rendering of carports near building 7. The contemporary Mediterranean style clubhouse building will have color scheme 2 with desert tones, multi -level roofs, architectural pop -outs, accent stucco colors, door and window trims, and louvred awnings over the front windows. The main clubhouse room includes bi-fold doors to provide an indoor -outdoor relationship to the pool deck area. The pool deck area includes access to the pool, spa, showers, and restrooms. 32 555 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Figure 6 - Rendering of clubhouse. The residential buildings will be similar in concept and composed of desert tones including tans and greys with accent colors. Covered breezeways provide access from both sides (long side) of each building with a stairway. The buildings will have architectural pop -outs for surface relief and a multi -height roofline. The facades will be detailed with stucco reglets creating a geometric pattern which will enhance the building design. The exterior doors and windows will have a header stucco trim in a lighter color to provide contrast. Each unit will have a door that leads to a covered balcony with a tube steel railing painted black in a decorative design or to a covered patio with a low wall. Vinyl windows and fiberglass doors will be white in color to provide a contrast to the stucco wall colors. Refer to elevation sheets A9 through Al for apartment building elevations. Each of the long sides of the buildings will have separate units on each side. The units will not have a railroad flat floor plan. The ends of the buildings include architectural pop -outs, contrasting horizontal banding, crown molding, and stucco recessed niches for surface relief. Buildings are designed as four-sided architecture with the street view facade very similar to the courtyard fapade. To prevent clutter, electric and water meters will be screened at the breezeways of each apartment building. 33 556 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Figure 7 - Rear courtyard with shade structure in center surrounded by apartment buildings 7-1 1. Figure 8 - View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountains in the background. The architecture will provide a positive living space for the future residents and make a positive contribution to this neighborhood of La Quinta and to the city as a whole. 34 557 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The administration and implementation section of this document is provided herein to further define the relationship between the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, City of La Quinta development codes and standards, and the process by which the La Quinta Village Specific Plan will obtain additional discretionary approvals as the project proceeds through the phases of the development process. Administrative Plan 1. La Quinta Village Specific Plan Upon its approval/adoption, the La Quinta Village Specific Plan as approved by the La Quinta City Council will become the primary document governing land use regulations. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan has development standards and land use regulations that will replace the corresponding standards in the City of La Quinta's Municipal Code. Where the Specific Plan does not address a standard or subject, the applicable City code and/or ordinance shall apply. The Corresponding Site Development for the La Quinta Village Apartments shall run with the property once the project is built and is transferrable to future owners of the property. The Site Development Permit shall expire if a building permit is not issued within two (2) years from approval of the Second Reading of the Specific Plan by the City Council. Prior to the expiration of the Site Development Permit, the property owner may apply for a two (2) year time extension to be approved by the Planning Commission on an annual basis. The time extension must be submitted prior to the expiration date of the project. 2. Interpretation Unless otherwise provided, should ambiguities occur concerning the content and appropriate application of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, said ambiguities shall be resolved by the Planning Manager of the City of La Quinta or his/her designee, in a manner most consistent with the intent, goals and policies set forth in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan and the City's General Plan as outlined in Section 9.200.110. The Director's decision is appealable to the Design and Development Director and or Planning Commission in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code. Implementation Program According to Government Code 65451 of the California Planning Law, the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall include a program for implementation including regulations, conditions, programs, and additional measures as necessary to carry out the plan. In response to this requirement, the Implementation Program for the SP and Mitigated Negative Declaration consists of the following: 1. Environmental Review and Mitigation Monitoring Program The Specific Plan has been subjected to Environmental Review pursuant to the provisions of CEQA for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 35 558 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The Mitigation Measures adopted for this project shall comply during all stages and phases of the project's construction and operation of the facility. 2. Adoption of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan and Approval of the Site Development Permit. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall be approved by Ordinance which includes a first reading, second reading, and then take effect 30 days after the second reading. The Site Development Permit will be processed concurrently with the Specific Plan and shall take effect after the 30-days have expired. 3. Grading and Improvement Plans A Precise Grading Plan (PGP) will be submitted to the City for approval Site Development Permit. Approval of a grading plan(s) will allow the developer(s) to begin grading the site for development. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), PM-10 Plan, and hydrology study will be required prior to approval of the PGP. Improvement plans such as street, water, sewer, and drainage plans will need to be submitted to the City of La Quinta and all affected agencies for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit(s). 4. Project Maintenance During construction, maintenance of all facilities will be the responsibility of the developer. After the property has been improved, ongoing maintenance of private facilities including streets, street lighting, landscaping, entry documentation and similar items will be the responsibility of the property owner. Site Development Permit Site -specific development of the site shall be subject to Site Development Permit and approval by both the Planning Commission and City Council for the City of La Quinta. If the Specific Plan is processed separately from the Site Development Permit, then the Site Development Permit shall be acted on by the La Quinta Planning Commission. 36 559 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023-XXX EXHIBIT D CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 1 OF 2 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Specific Plan 2022-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 General Plan Amendment 2022-0001 Site Development Permit 2022-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The applicant requested in its initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the City's Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the City's inventory of sites, as approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in accordance with the City's regional housing need assessment (RHNA) pursuant to Section 65584. Therefore, pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e), the applicant is required to ensure compliance with the state "no net loss" law set forth in Section 65863. 4. Prior to Specific Plan 2022-0001 becoming effective, prior to Site Development Permit 2022-0001 being eligible for approval, and prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the City's update to the Housing Element shall be approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 180 days of approval by City Council of GPA2022-0001. This approval by HCD must include certification of the City's Housing Element after adding "Site 6", as noted in Exhibit A of the Planning Commission Resolution, to the inventory of sites within the City to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the RHNA. If, within 180 days of approval by City Council, HCD does not approve and/or certify the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6," then GPA2022-0001 shall be repealed on its own accord without the need for further action by City Council Specific Plan 2022-0001 shall not become effective, Site Development Permit 2022-0001 shall not be approved, and no grading, construction, or building permit for the Project may be issued by the City. 560 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 20F2 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any dwelling unit, an applicant shall agree to, and the city shall ensure, that the designated 74 moderate -income units are subject to a recorded affordability restriction of 55 years or longer to ensure continued affordability (Affordability Covenant). The Affordability Covenant shall be in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and shall require, among other terms and conditions, eligibility criteria as determined by state law for selecting eligible households, rental limits, annual income verification for current households, and the unit numbers designated as the 74 moderate -income units. The Affordability Covenant shall be binding upon all successors in interest of the applicant and shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder. 6. The property owner shall submit to the Design and Development Department on an annual basis by January 30 of every year a record of rent payments for the 74 designated moderate -income units that meet the Riverside County moderate -income rent limits. 561 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023-XXX EXHIBIT E CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 1 OF 19 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Site Development Permit shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.laquintaca.gov. 3. The Site Development Permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months after City Council approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080 unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design Planning Division • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of 562 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 2 OF 19 improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. 563 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 3 OF 19 E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The provision for the funding and perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required; and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs is required. 7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 10. Site Development Permit 2022-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 Specific Plan 2022-0001 General Plan Amendment 2022-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 11. The applicant requested in its initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the City's Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the City's inventory of sites, as approved by the California Department of 564 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 4 OF 19 Housing and Community Development (HCD) in accordance with the City's regional housing need assessment (RHNA) pursuant to Section 65584. Therefore, pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e), the applicant is required to ensure compliance with the state "no net loss" law set forth in Section 65863. 12. Prior to Specific Plan 2022-0001 becoming effective, prior to Site Development Permit 2022-0001 being eligible for approval, and prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the City's update to the Housing Element shall be approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 180 days of approval by City Council of GPA2022-0001. This approval by HCD must include certification of the City's Housing Element after adding "Site 6", as noted in Exhibit A of the Planning Commission Resolution, to the inventory of sites within the City to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the RHNA. If, within 180 days of approval by City Council, HCD does not approve and/or certify the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6," then GPA2022-0001 shall be repealed on its own accord without the need for further action by City Council and Specific Plan 2022-0001 shall not become effective, Site Development Permit 2022-0001 shall not be approved, and no grading, construction, or building permit for the Project may be issued by the City. 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any dwelling unit, an applicant shall agree to, and the city shall ensure, that the designated 74 moderate -income units are subject to a recorded affordability restriction of 55 years or longer to ensure continued affordability (Affordability Covenant). The Affordability Covenant shall be in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and shall require, among other terms and conditions, eligibility criteria as determined by state law for selecting eligible households, rental limits, annual income verification for current households, and the unit numbers designated as the 74 moderate - income units. The Affordability Covenant shall be binding upon all successors in interest of the applicant and shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder. 14. The property owner shall submit to the Design and Development Department on an annual basis by January 30 of every year a record of rent payments for the 74 designated moderate -income units that meet the Riverside County moderate - income rent limits. 565 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 5OF19 PROPERTY RIGHTS 15. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights -of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, site development permit, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 17. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Washington Street (Major Arterial, 128' ROW) — The standard 64 feet from the centerline of Washington Street except for additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial 108' ROW) — The standard 54 feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 except for additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 18. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the rough grading plans submitted for plan checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1" equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 19. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary prior to approval of the improvements dedicating such right-of-way, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. . ^. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 6OF19 20. At locations where the onsite finished grade has an elevation differential with respect to the arterial street top of curb exceeding 11.0 feet, the applicant shall comply with, and accommodate, the maximum slope gradients in the parkway area and sidewalk requirements by installing retaining walls between the sidewalk and the back of the landscaped area as needed as approved by the City Engineer. 21. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 22. Direct vehicular access to Washington Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Site Development Permit, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. 23. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 24. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property after the date of approval of the Site Development Permit unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 25. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 26. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 27. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) 567 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 7 OF 19 A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Washington Street (Major Arterial; 128' RAW): Widen the east side of the street at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) The applicant shall construct a concrete bus stop pad north of the primary entry drive on Washington Street as required by SunLine Transit and approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. Bus turnout shall be provided if required by SunLine Transit for the bus stop. b) A deceleration/right turn only lane shall be provided at the Washington Street Primary Entry as determined by the City Engineer. Other required improvements in the Washington Street right-of-way and/or adjacent area include: c) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. d) 6-foot-wide sidewalk. e) Extend the existing raised median on Washington Street north of Avenue 50 to line up with the curb face on the south side of the primary entrance to prevent southbound Washington Street traffic from making illegal left turns into the project entrance on Washington Street as approved by the City Engineer. f) Establish a Class II Level II benchmark in the Washington Street right of way and file a record of the benchmark with the County of Riverside. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial; 108' R/W): Widen the south side of the street along the project boundary within the existing City right-of-way or obtain right-of-way dedication from landowners on the south side of Avenue 50, if needed, to accommodate: a) At the Avenue 50/Washington Street intersection, a right turn only lane, a golf cart/ bike lane on the north side and south side of Avenue 50, a westbound thru lane, two eastbound thru lanes, and dual westbound left turn lanes as approved by the City Engineer. 568 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 8OF19 b) Along the project frontage, a golf cart/ bike lane on the north side and south side of Avenue 50, two westbound thru lanes, two eastbound thru lanes, and a painted median as approved by the City Engineer. Other required improvements in the Avenue 50 right-of-way and/or adjacent area include: c) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. d) 6-foot-wide sidewalk. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. 28. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Primary Arterial 4.5" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. Major Arterial 5.5" a.c./6.5" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 569 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 9OF19 29. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 30. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Washington Street - Primary Entry: Right turn movements in and out are allowed. Left turn movements in and out are prohibited. B. Avenue 50 - Secondary Entry for Residence Only: Right turn in and out movements are allowed. Left turn movements in and out are prohibited. 31. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 32. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings, and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 33. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 34. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking space and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking space design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues. 570 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 10 OF 19 D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking spaces and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking space or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible parking space is required per 8 accessible parking spaces. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 35. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 36. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal D. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal F. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical 571 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 11 OF 19 G. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the parkway area. H. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical NOTE: E through H to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and accessibility requirements. 37. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.laquintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 38. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 39. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible 572 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 12 OF 19 record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 40. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements on Washington Street and Avenue 50, the applicant deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements required on Washington Street and Avenue 50. 41. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 42. Depending on the timing of the development of this Site Development Permit, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction. 573 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 13 OF 19 In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. GRADING 43. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 44. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 45. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A final WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, and F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 574 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 14 OF 19 46. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 47. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.230(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 48. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the preliminary grading plan, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 49. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments or as approved by City Engineer. 50. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 51. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit Site Plan, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance finding review. 52. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 575 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 15 OF 19 nRAINAr,F 53. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology study for the Troutdale Village project (SDP2022-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 54. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site including the half -street tributary area on Washington Street and Avenue 50 during the 100- year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3-hour, 6 hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total run off. 55. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 56. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 57. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 58. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 59. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 576 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 16 OF 19 60. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 61. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 62. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 63. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer/owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 64. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 65. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 577 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 17 OF 19 66. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. Applicant may request a waiver from undergrounding poles, such as the poles on the northern property line, consistent with the City's undergrounding waiver guidelines in the La Quinta Municipal Code. Waiver must be approved by City Council. 67. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 68. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 69. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 70. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 71. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Manager for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 18 feet in height and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 578 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 18 OF 19 72. All water features shall be designed to minimize "splash" and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Design and Development Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 73. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 74. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 75. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 76. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall/fence, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. PUBLIC SERVICES 77. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 78. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 79. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, common areas, and stormwater BMPs. 579 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 19 OF 19 FEES AND DEPOSITS 80. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 580 �l r I I JFRW e 41p MOM b 17 pir lk 44 figGO PIT 0-' W7. 4041. PkL 0 FID. I � F-.t- ATTACHMENT 2 11 FRED WARIN4,2R ....... v AL H VF i I L ;- i Z 1 13L i 2 i ,•' a 12V i 1 1 r j 1 50th AVE. '� 1 i !N -Z a 10 jN i < iw p 52nd AVE. .,_,_,_._,_._._._._.. i p 1 w W LL 1 Z 1 W LL ,N j W 1 0 1 i 1 i 3 54th AVE. 15 i i i 2 ! , 1 i i 20 ; 16; i 19 ® i i y � . 1 ............................................................. 60th AVE. 18 1 1 ii 1 7� r i �. i i ! i 62nd AVE. ! 1 i i ! ! i i ! 1 i ! ! N i 1 i Zoning OS CC CN CO CP _ CR 0 CT _ FP _ GC MC ® OS PR RC - RH RL RM _ RMH ROW RVL - VC _______61-1 4thAVE;�___.i Miles Updated 03.10.2023 0 0.5 1 2 Housing Inventor�8&tes ATTACHMENT 3 PROJECT DATA PROJECTADDRESS HIE CGIVaV4 OF WUIINGPOR BIITEEB 4 AVYAUI NP AW.LKNAMPICIE-W 4fi 030.016 cRIPTION B4 ACRES MIL IN POR LOT 1 MB 02V099 DESERT CLUB MANOR TR 2 LOI 1 B.IM-a. Nana DESERT CLUB MANOR TR 2 Acres BE M MIL LILT— Lai Rec Map Type Map Book I111N RW P 0IJ V y Pw Pn01 PpsRa � W'4rA OPE OF WORK PROPOSED 2AN; 3ND STORY COMMUNITYAPARTMENT BUIL AND WITH CLUBHOUSE- GARAGES, CARPORTS. POOL, AND COMMUNITY SPACES AND NECESSARY HARDSCgPE AND ONARDkED1AN0 U.E-RENIA.ANRYrIINflt SHE DATA EXISTING ZONING RMH- MEOIUMIHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (B-12 UNITS PER ACRE) INI AffO imm WJOtt4101YJtl OVERLAY rRGIN10[0lKxMK (8-12U IT PER ACRE) YAi'OplN11Al WITH UNITS PER ACRE) WITH DENSITY BONUS - SEE PROJECT INFO BELOW SITE AREA 611, 1469 BE) 1403ACRES BUILOINGOOOTPRINT 940BB EF MAX, LOT COVERAGE 6D'AOFNETLOT AREA=366,60BUBEF LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED 316%=2056155E 91I1OINGARFA TOTAL PROPSED DWELLING UNITS 252 UNITS 12112970 SF Ipy CD1140NfMAMAAI'ARCOIAILOIX 30%OF NET PROJECT AREA =183,344.04 SF LODYWOlK..NARFAPROV4EY• 34S%=2114025F A41rrt RLCCCATD]IfMEA REtlIRICD. 30'%OF COMMON OPEN AREA REQUIRED = 55003 SF ACTIVE RECREATION AREA PROVIDED: 3L1%=57,11D EF Np41LOMrROVT6E- Oa- MINIMUMINTERIORSIDEYARDEETRACK: S. MINIM OM EXTERIORSIDEYARDSETRACK 1QU' MINIMUMREARYARD SETBACK 15'U' MIN PERIMETER LANDSCAPE SETBACK: AYO lGR�RTA LNIpGCAK.SCTIAL 2-- MRX NO OF STORIES ALLOWED PER RMH ZONING: 2 -SEE SPECIFIC PIAN^ IAOUINTAGENERALPIAN EXHIBIT36: PRIMARYIMAGECORRIDOR FYAB•1r'lG1411 Br1RLR SECONDARYIMAGECORRIDOR: ARpNUL AD IMAGE CORRIDOR SETBACK: I:aaY' AMONAM ii It"" At IUAUO COAKR>tW lTSE4 UVAa,rANlDKymeef6i.r n,: .., !"ESPEGIFICPIANFORAGD INFO"' BUILDING CDTIDR OCCUPANCY TYPES 2,AND CONSTrKUCTION ONTY TYPE TYPE "' VA SPRINKLERS YES FOLLY SPRINHLERED INFPA 13) A1LOA MILE6 KOPLI0 nEMIl RAV„M AIINft. ADEAPECIPCMAJt" 11oPYaeG NI11LOPlO r;lOflT AFpWRKAw tYA' PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT AT2-STORY SLOGS:21- r•rtrR�n-.CG 11 I{KNri 4r I. P IMT QLBGIF: IB'-B' KAu]HALL,[ tWARl929. tn16d' 9lII:WY P.:!l'rS1.7S.L'F. JkLYART.LIiN all.WearuuxL a�ae uulea vPty 01194LUfAMV491ALDIND.CG 31 PROJECT INFORMATION 1-Bed Apadmanl lA-STD I 31 111 201."I 1-Betl Apadmanl 1B-ADA I 44 ]55 33,210 1-8 ed Aparlmenl 1B-STD L 61 755 46,B10 2-0etl Apad1 e 1 ZA-ADA Z. 34 9.. U."'2-BNd Aoadmanl 2A-STD 2 52 960 0SM DENSITY CALCULATIONS LIAR�NSItt: t4 D3 ACRES R 12 UNITSIACRE = 10B BASE UNITS TOTA UNITS PROPOSED: 50%OENSITV BONUS IS 14 03 ACRES R 10 UNITSIACRE 252 UNITS BEING PROPOSED = 252 PROPOSED UNITS FOR 50% DENSITY BONUS, .1111C kAO.rlq OCM11Y 44%OF BASE UNITS NEED TO BE MODERATE INCOME UNITS BASED ON BOIRIS PKAOlN1ACE3. 4Ary L IN,- E4 SgtIhRAli mccw. UNTO MARKET-RATEUNR1 111 DIR1110'MPLRC}MrW[S VODLRi1LI1rOML UNIT• ]4 'M 1810 wRT14L1lrR wl Yr2 rVpTgl TOTALUNRS 952 4118I:0 uN13 Aa11riHE5E NIdl�� UNITS 501-BED UNITS (6757%ol 74 UNITS) ItanrovAAry rf 2.�la lAm�nY..r a,uurrtal III YOTFI N!.F.Er WLT1;yMil MIXO r410NL LO0ERATE INLCAC M11f Area (SF) Area (SF) Bldg 01 (,STORY) 10,097 Bldg 01 (,-STORY) 14 07E Bldg 02 (2-STORY) 15,521 BHg 02 (,-STORY) 19,791 Bldg 03 (3-STORY) 29,68E Bldg 03 (3-STORY) 3],2]8 Bldg 04 (203fiNRY) 20,80] Bldg (ZA3-S "' 35,300 Bldg 05 (2-sTONYI 120314 Bldg 05 (2-STORY) 15,443 Bldg 06 asTm 1"M BItlg 06 (1-STORY) 21009 IV%) n P1,75g Bldg O] (]-STORY) 27430 ;!1 3-STORY) 271983 Bldg 08 FMtM" 34,131 Bldg 09 (2-smpYl 12,906 Okla (2P;LPD eJ 16.114 Bldg 10 (E-STORY) 121884 O{d910 1F9TOgrL 16,225 Bldg 11 (2-51DNY) 131]1] Bldg 11 12-STORY) ti, 163 Clubhouse (1-STORY) 21680 Clubhouse H-STORY) 3,226 Pool Equip (1- rij) 186 POOI Equip, H-STORY) 206 206,108agFt 258,199 sgIT ?I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T C T S 245 Fischer AVen,,, S.C. B-2 C-I. Mesa CA 92626 (]14) 557 2448 w Ipao .c ANC1•I I"fU NE Pl ur+.IHr. COuBuLPIRG La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC4 r�. - _q4w - - "It'llI 1 ,A& -} PARKING CALCULATIONS Common Area Calculati... Perking Caks A— (BE) Cty ADA B ADA VAN 2 AM- ACCESSISIE STANDARD AIIKING SPACE ISX191+5 AISLE PER LQMC 960, 260(1) BY-RIGMT PARKING INCEONE, THE PARKING AM19 X 19).g MSIF D�LLOLWING PARKING NATION SHALL APPLY M THE ENTIRE OPMENT L NOLUDING MARKET-NATE UNITS) 1, FIr MD., CLUBHOUSE RESIDENTACTIVITY 978 Pre Riser MECHANICAL 12 C 20 6 = MIMPACT PARKING sacE(flsxl6•I GYM HALL RESIDENTACTIVITY CIRCULATION 725 106 GC 4 BR UNIIS: I SPACE PERUNIT REQUIRED COVERS.COMPACT PAINING SPACE ULI' x l],5'1 Z-BRUNITS: 15 SPACES PER UNIT REQUIRED HK SERVICE 36 CP 2B1 SPACE (IS 19) EMIR, ADMINISTRATION 290 REV w FLY = FUTURE IN PARKING SPACE (9X 19) EllitplDfACIIIRlle4iQDY� Pool RETENTION BASIN 1,343 FEV ADA 1 = PARKING SPAGE(9' x L9'I rs' AISIE uNmVEREOSTANOagOPARKINGSPACES: ee;IrclLL�IiEVsve1 Pool Deck TERRACE ],094 FEV VAN 1 PARKING SPACE I9• X 19)♦B• AISLE UNCOVERED COMPACT PARKING SPACES: 281Mear ,, mrel vax FImIRE EV VAN I MVEREO ACCESSIBLE PATUNG SPACER: 6 FeVm�) Pool Equip MECHANICAL 106 (1 37 ue4w G= 111STANOAROPARKINGSPACE(ID'X2o') rAR1YAT W)KAIANNO IMIN: PAIL'. 332C.4w'MR, maczl RR RESTROOMS 124 LAW I MAIL= DESIGNATED MAIL VAN PARKING SPACE 19 x191 CARPORT COMPACT PARKING SPACES: 41N 111 maml Shouter RESTROOMS fi0 p 09 P = STANDARD PARKING SPACE 19 X I9)ITX 17) CARPONT ACCE55IB1E PARKING SPA 4 p,•autlss c RV mam) Spa RETENTION BASIN 93 52p CA1{LFi f1AV0a.v yAO[PI49PALi3 56U•Laxl rn:Pere) S for SERVICE ill Wel Bar CIRCULATION 3fi TOTAL SPACES 5201 ' "'P, mares) WH MECHANICAL 12 pTrNerrr'T NOTE: LQMC9.60.260 IN) RY-RIGHT PARKING INCENTIVE AND PARKING ILIRTOS APPLY TO THE ENTRE DEVELOPMENT (NOT RESTRICTED TO ONLY AFFORDABLE UNITS) PARKING MTIOS PER LQMC 9.60 260 ARE LISTED ABOVE. 11,294 aq R IlikaN�LYDPn eRKET geTF UNITS 1161-RR UNITS K I SPAGE/UND REQUIRED =1I6 Gty Area ISE) T.Wl ISE) fill -BR UNRSR I S SPACESNNIi REQUIRED = 93 111Af �RM MOnE0.eT INCnM D9: 501-BRUNDSNI SPACEIUND REQUIRED = 50 Balcony 29 61 1,]89 COMMUNUX-CE 342-BA UNITS K Ll SPACESIUNIT REQUIRED = 36 I SPACE PER 300 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA Balmny 34 66 2,244 r6my ems! a_R1_ Balmny 44 60 2,640 lODILSMC1f133JM4ED IW 107 6,653 aq IT IOIAL gAID11410Y1OL0� Si0 levee VBR4 L•M10RPnw NeIJEQglILD.ILILLQtlLISG,LOSIplL�i011vMlUMGJNl:wr1LS Balcony 29 61 1,]69 �5' COMM lN1tt PROVIDED: 390 COVERED 115 UNCOVERED t.SNL'IIL._ V.Rle1ARU.:;!•;."E..�!0 Balmny 34 R 2,244 •DTA vacs PNDVIO'NT +w EG' Q . 1EE MWIEME` - In Pri B.I_Oy 44 60 2.G40 107 1111,1111101 NIR N019. WAANV FEV 1pMLAVO p WCWDEG AN T'i RIR9P LPAAX2NlI CUVNY ThlldPbyr ew.BY 2 61 122 Lele1A019GLCNLLf30NR �ISY NAIBIIe efdlll[Ol4 bLLNtlb IDCY41ALlL[IKG Ne0u1N 60 NRGAOEiERSlIi Benny 1B fill 1,000 TOTAL PAR KING SPACES 10e TOTAL PAAKIAG fAAf.Ls APC SHORT-TERM 035 IAV D•1OMLPAifJNq SIR1R:3 M 11-1 VISITOR VEmaE PARRINw Eli 1B 6fi 1, 188 E% OF 513 ASSIGNED PARKING SPACES LON-111 0-AAR 3B 2,390 sq A TOTAL HC SPACES REQ'D I1 N ORE EV SPACES READ 52 NOT AMP, W 11 OR MORE TE NRE EV SPACES PROVIDED 52 252 15,696 aqR S%OF7UMSS[f PARKING SPACE MIN ING TOTAL HC SPACES REQ'0 TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED a LBICY BICYCLE fW KINK- Ee01g AOA CAR SPAQN REQY3 ID PSRGLGREIN1,IO6A.3: E1111C VEHICLE CHARGING SPACES (EV SPACES) CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING FUTURE City Area (BE) Tnkl(BE) AM VAN SPACE, REQ.. 1 TOTALADA SPACES PROVIDED 12 ELECTWCAL VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (ME). INTENDED TO DEMONSTRATE PROIECTS CAPABIUTY D FIR 11 a 00 CAPACITY FOR FACILITATNG FUTURE EV CHARGING I'"MINI I lZ 12 NUREQUJUCREIREE FOR TV KNEES M RE CONSTRUCTED OR AVABAeLE UNDL EV CNARGER9 ARE INSTALLED MR USE 12 ,BDagN La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 VICINITY MAP i'r�l Y r SHEETINDEX T1 Ti S S00L C1 nvl451rEKm G2 CONCEPTUALGRADINGPLAN C3 PRELVLll Wilt" PLAN C4 FIYDROLOGYMAPAND PREUMINARYWOMP ARCHITIECTIARAL Al SA. Pkn •r _ A2 FrS1 Fbor Plan i.• A3 SOmIId HTNer PI.. A4 Tim FI Pkn AS Reef Plan A6 Unil Pkn. A7 Gubheuse AS B11g.1-EkYafo- A9 Bllg 2-Ek-bDls AID Bldg. 3-El.-KAs All Bldg 3-FJevaDops Al2 Bklg 4-Ebvali m A13 Bldg 5-El wh... A14 Bldg. 6-Ekaallons A15 Bldg T-EIKI h... A16 Bldg B- Ekafions All B1h39-EINVahens PAN Bldg. 10-Elevetiorm Al. Bldg 11_ELy o. AM Eldedor EIKKKKA. -1 30 V AM i0 v4 41Ml2eIN404.0 A23 Lne W Sight DiagONAK El.0 --_Sik UghOng Pkn El.I bile Lighff g Pkn E1,2 S0e Pholomellc Plan E13 SKe PhDIGRNhlc PI ­ ERA 1101 Fukm Cul Sheeb LP-1----C...PABI LRK d-r Pkn LP-2 Typial Belding PIDDOM Exhibil LP-3 Sbpe Pknfing SKIM LPG RD UPIN LP3 Enlry L"Cenmplual Wall & Fence Pbn PROJECT TEAM DINNER Tmuldab vdi LLC 1000 Blanlmiship PA. SWI. US West Linn, Omgm 97060 T. 1503) 8078552 JRO TI IAN, ABCHRECT IrNb Padn .1 Arrld-ISR 245 HScher AYenIIe, SOik 02 Cock Mesa, CA 9MM T. 714S57-2448 IN Nno ipae0 cem Sh Nq Bmun CIVIL Egan CN11 Inc 42M Madio SUeel, Suile A IMID. CA 922U1 T'. n 0) 40I 663 W:.:_d mm SkAA,' FEB... P,*.l Deslgrler LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Hermann Desgn C ulP, Inc. 71899 WOY RNad, Sulk 102 Palm Desed, GA 92211 T: 76P777A131 W'_Kil kc mm Jose ESlydda, W. INSPBS Manager ELECIWCAL RTM Engim, ing G.... Ikrlb 392491I.BDIN, SIKNLSBRKA-101 Palm 0...d, CA 92211 T: (]60) 983 2007 W: KNIANWlmec mm ViMr Leon, PE, PrindpW Title T1 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 5/7/2023 21014 La Quinla SO V2 583 No �O A rvH (PRINT: 11A00>:SF .t I . . . . .. .. '-'.^y ..`J •-M1 _ , . `iBAyR•J.116f .�.Aa(+ Ids •LINE EST- - -----. - .-___-_ -- - ----- -�- -- - -----•• ----------_-'�._--------------r-i^•-----------___----�------- _ ------____��_ — -- ---------------- - — ---------------------... — J_ TFNvcre Ire - - _ u 40 4 40 e0 120 ABBREVIATIONS: =RUNE TP TOP OF �AVENENT SCALE: 1 =40 E%_S-1NG GROLvI TC TOP OF �URB FLC. _NNE TF TOP OF-JOTING FIN:E-I SURFA_- TW TOP OF 114LL -�3 GRAD: BREAK (%% %Xj EXIST:%� ELEVAT:-V SMILE T�{///jjj"77/yy9 u� tiL m� �Ir PRINTED ON: 06/06/2023 MFIIEE,-&3Z ��BEA hVAM.'I JF :LF3 12036 j E EVATI]N Z52 27 T:;/ OATUk VGV]29 FT y WTE REVISIONS APPCR �opTE Q'QFE53/p� EGAN CIVIL, INC, � APPROVED BY: PIAN CHECKED BT: DN , nE CI I 1 OF LA GUIN 1 A, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1x5_RI=*ION: -W OE OFE AT T,- MR AS SHOWN ON i-= "ITY OF RANCHO N:RAGE rya �K R6 rA r 7�,.. Sr. T FLANS FOR IE REES- R :T-ICE BU101%. SIE-T 9 3 off FILE •N -EC � RLA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTTvIENTSACF C:T" ENGMER T,- :nY OF BANDIED AIRA;- AS =-:N NACER CMW371 y y !„ P8 8NX 5282 Bi ppIRN I,><. I,�i al l�X-51iii CIY1L OFaAs7s ur vd�cs: a REG 484. 669 www.EWX bll. X DA,E CIVIL SITE PLAN 3 IH- BASS CF 3FARIN,S -DR THE SLRVER ARE BASED DN - -FDRVA N�, UJUnSHEETS K PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF:-ORDIN.- SYSTJA (CCSM3 ZONE N4 (201753 =POC1) AS PER ,RD INvRSE * 1RAFFlCy7Ztl,,-31 CAL —TONS 3-TNEN CONTIVLOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE :C.O,R.S.) 5-OTDSCRY ME NUM011 ):G 'A91 AVG PI41 '-R 'P053-D VALJES PAOVO-D 3" ENE SCRI==S 113IT AND *l CL431 b@� DALE: O6/O6/2023 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX R911: f'.EI iiL PI L'IXOiN] kIYIGE a I '=RIAAN-iR ARRAY CENTER IS OVA: L 3-IV,: NORTH 78' 59' 35.49• WEST. Or [RLIl BENJAMIN DANIEL EGAN, R C E ]JO]O RE�'h.YAED AND REC NDED L1Y WASHINGTON ST B AVENUE 50. LA OUINTA, CA 92253 GlliL LANDSCAPE AM 61 0] 016 COA =---~-~~^�--�-=--'- ---- '- ---' --- ------ ---------'- - --------- ~�~�� | - -- ---- -----_-- ~- - -~------_ - -- - - -�--- - ----��= -- - -r------����-- | LUC 40 �5 EC57114; TO Top OF JOE RAN -IT- 4'�40u YARDS T4 TOP OF 'ALL AIARMN BY DAM Apm "Tr APPROWD By'. IN THE CrrY OF LA CXJINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TOLL FREW ' T I'M BEFORE CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN OF YOU DIC FS _CR ILRv_� ARE BASEE 011 TAE -ALIFORIJA ;j; PREPAR(D QNDIUR ON DIRF�P SUTVM� U. SHEETS 3 y -POGI) A5 PER ;RD INVERSE CITY FILE NUMBER TOLL 'FREE YT, 11 111, ­R —LISA-0 VAEJES FROVID-1) � THE I-R-S 033H AKE DATE 6/06/2023 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX N4a 2f'09'A c I —�- •SET Al:� le.11 �■VAT► :VA!•I� ��R � _ - �� IVA _ - Y ME ::F e t: f'•iIiII PRINTED ON: 06/06/2023 WFREE�-WD-Q2-41M Ij� �tl°°EA�" °goo REVISIONS C "Tv aO?ESS' . APPROVED BY: PEA" CHECKED BY: IN THE CITY OF LA OUNT RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ]]�l J� BBID,A: TOP OF DIM / OVATION 25127 TG I DARK N�9 FT NAR� BY DA,E OPR- WE $, EGAN CIVIL, INC. " 3 DESORIPTIDE TOP OF CM AT TIE Ba AS SHOW ON THE Cm OF RMFIO NIRME �o �F oNkT�.r r >�� SKEET F1AVS FOR TIE NFS9iR OFFICE BJILDO4. 4EEf 9 OF 9ON FILE IN 7FE 4� �, a LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTSOFFICE OF CITY MIIFER OF TIE CITY OF RANX MIRAGE AS RAN NAb R EOB00T71. ao 8R1 s ex uppu(pI Gt gp2ae. G "L PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 3 BtAL:m17061404•78 9"N1�.EGI[IICMIIL(fk DATE UEFOWSMEM THE EAASIS OF BEARINGS FOR MIS SURVEY ARE &W ON THE WDFORNN s NO. 0 0 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OFCOORDNATESYSTEM(CCSB3). ZONE V. (201750 EFMH) AS PER GRID NYERSE TRAFFIC2-41A CALCULATIONS BETWEEN CONINUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (CO.RS.) srATaD252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEXO P491 AND PNI PER PUBLLSNEO VALUES PROVIDED Bt THE SCPoPPS OAFgf AND elf Dr GEU�F DAIS: 06/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST h AVENUE 50, LA CUINTA, CA 92253 A R1R, IC SEWIC= IN M TAU SERVICE AEERF PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (SOP.AC ), SEND: NORTH 79 59' 35.49 WEST. RFNJAMIN DANIEL ELAN, R C-E 73070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED DY: FATE LANDSCAPE APR 646-070-C 16 r PROPERTV LINE WTER1OIt SIDEVARD SETBACK LINE —_ SIDEYARD SET BACK MINIMUM SETBACK PLUS PUT FOR EVERY 1E1P61AE���21A CURB 5950-'N 1327.53' RIKH1rA •OILI / 4000' FOOT OVER I]'-0'IN BUILDING GIrT, MAXIMUM SETBACK OFIG'd' .cl�In[ uNM IrY 0.AM1 +LYCNNY6WlN ILNI.gNI r.'� f ,I z4v ----- -- —_�� ucsss—_. — r s�•si_ �rus urti u--.-- t i-_ —_ - — --- - .. -- — ----- ----�- •_ rijP Izs1 -0e R1. Rz I BLnClc wui 'T II f C L C G G G G 0 IIT I / I]221')RJ G G G 0 G p ! Q� O G G ! P i O G I I` p G G p p G p J p p p O ! J a ! p 6 0 G p q p p q C E OESERrs—I, / S 1111 q 1 1 I ! rC!1e•er - � tLw W.•Ywr %OA x'A'>1Crf r �.= SC'1BACK C 4 P gEL p TRASH ENCLASURE �W RYf20{STRIC� SETBACK LINE ! I HiPORr ARPORr CARPORT- CMPORT (E) POWER POLE P _ _ SOSDRE r7 .-,• , �. C , P ,LUETER LANDSCAPING IBE UNDERGROUND I Ijit;t _ ---... .... Typ I r p F W. �L� C! Cp 'LFy GI p .@ C! CF jCI C! ! C} C C! CAI q' CT C• CF CP d LP / 1a'E7&LC1C MINIMUM - FI qt P C! CF LP p'E Nwh G G► CF C a Lf CI C1' BICYCLE RACK•• C 3US STOP & SHELTER I I P • .... ......: ...... ........ ............. - [[ _. _ .... _ C �'V PIISIPERTY LINE I ! I ORANT�•.V,.t�yl ,•2BICYCLE RACK •[NI HVD •i P •I • I G /6: l' I QESfRt4F.4R P p �' I P CVENSc ! rT # Bldg.9 P P Bldg•2 'P {d 25[ory 1 I f5��_ Q• • 2 Story T Bldg. 10 16 Units Total I I-•P^ Bldg. 1 . •>•� • 22 Units To [al 2 Story • •} • - / ,EFT ! PROPERTY UNE I P P [! 2 Story :psV f f 16 Units Total _ ! .? �. • 16 Units Total j, InEalm .1 -r ° _ -y- ° .. L • PES'ER/lC4PF. . �^ NI RY / ?. . I' R I r 41t P t� BIS o� •� .1• 'yPp 'CARPpRI. . p • 1 16 Units Total � ,l7 1 F>9Yr' ADAa41TN G. / 11EtLAry�'96PL ; 1 f OT±TII P P LINE OF IMAGE T P HER311T REST •� _ TFAGFr j t _ { • • 1.nn� 'IeHC1Ci4URE V. PE➢OA �• AAer • - — - p ..P _ . 1 VI rFEY it • CI ¢ r�' L O!, 71 t `�YEHICLi ARTS ••, FRa Flit '• L►• c RRP17Ri K� I I Bp 3 StoryG ^i qq1 (111 M'OfWi: .• yp pF .36 Units Total SBtory r T Syr �Ep�V M(HDl -- Clubhouse VB5 • TA/15H a';Igir f.IPE 78 Units Tota tL 11 1i•10• Va.- 1 Story • •! f l_ tPf• 1 / •t W '�I , i. GN -. ._. ill : WATEA(EATDIE 1� A .... .! _ .....J ^•''Cp �y�, {1 :J I ;�. �• 9EESN.T1yW"avmA x� _.. aY .. ................. O AV F8 �� CALL i �.w 1e • ~~ 1 !1 P •••11! p CFi• T��• n $ '-I $Dirt' 42pF I i + { �• Cp 7. A• �� 3 :•, k � - KN777L � FEV V � •� , S - �p � 4 j` Z .-I 1 fla9f _ VF111CGE.aArE If G69fA1%CAPF �•— _ L! r O _i 1 .... J.f 'EV AO "• .Clf E�.;1 _ CP f •t � -� • / • - r aIIEA)CI[ •ti -cr v �C7 Q PFA LIA cGUErA ��rr trey F`° I PeR r nw Z w Ill_': C...I $1T1: sI(irJ Pl:t� P I nicW P • 1'7EY7 ArY ••i' . ~ �g� f ly; CM 4 LANE ~ 'L'B.0 11GAA$,9 �� • • �. f F• . 7 /.1 P • Bldg. 4.1 . • Bldg- -2 ,1• • • . V. CARPORT ! •'+ •� . �, r F^ L z ,c + •; Story 16 Units Total Bldg. 7 r• liq : ! • �_ ��' Q l• Rt3e1.118N wrl--.' ° 12 L2,nits Total I ! ry1 y 3 Story Y Erw 3 1 1_ P I• �! 24 Units Total PORT ecq a F •'�Pj.. r CF G P 1 _ •� -- --DESERT—A � HYDRANT k I I p :P I:P' LP{LD I!T}'LP •� CPILP CP P ♦CP CP I,'JCr Cp C! C_p E} C! ICI ...... '• • • �,- Cti CP•Cpi CT • •E✓w ! b$' .r CpcF f r F .. I fl LI IE E L f�-J �'I 1 ��_. I f GP f I I• I 13E 3[41S.:AfF. G ON CARPORT . �•• • p . ' • f g 1 _ �n' ARpaRr I' p LINE OF IMAGE CORRIDOR 1 _ w HEIGHT RESTRICTION `i• '1 PROPFRlY LINE I CARPORT I 1iI II 1 Lo61JR1: ��� ARPORt 6 � I _ ! IN[ OF IMAGE CORRIDOR l l � CF cp EF EI' CI � I.I on .A a�uW j I -• ti� � � �_ • — — r �76MrRESrRICT1Ql1^ L4 CI I,y Pl VaLM1 �{ ..— wNd1I F4.� ZT EP. 4n✓ �rP GA E! IE ► Ep �A G •1 F+' // r L. •btm'Yn CP L GIWPORT .. .. ...... - -1+n Isrl�lcwr ctu�rscAps - ' IrAa I---AAPrUD1HG$ET4ACX LI 1 • p�q lry C! Er ENLEOSURB PER VWB �I( 1 faZ'9'_ ,! 1 • 1 ` ' ,g I Ray. c✓•.' Im i PER1Mt:TtiR f f.. I Bld 5 4 •• r• • 2StoryPIC` K ILEB4ALL LANDSCAPINldg. 6 G SETBACK 9' EE LEyy . t (E POWER POLEUNDERGROUND, I AVERAGE AC lLyaL[ I ..,. 2 itary ..., ! 24 Units Total •F^'L t� ' ► # f y BE UNDERGROUND, I I i sVERacE zo a'sETBgDcq I -1 • 16 Units Total • TYP ESPECIF MFORMATION 1B rf 1 . E BLOCK WALL If11O% Z - 3 T , 1\ ACCE !E ~Bµ.].'}1'E 1� ERIMETER d' BLOCK WALL ` - _ E tRT•E SIGN PER _3�ACK b�lga LANDSCAPING SETBACK N89`5903'W tOF 1�3'r 41FFiTrq,• n� -� '- 1la•rl T 1R�rssur•E[ CVVVD PROPERTY IpTR MWrIAtmC4F1VCK. (NOT APART) ASIA SPECIFIC cmrwPLAN FFOR oomoNAL I.urDRKurlax fiM32.52' Y. I NM']A03W 1,/y 132.52R`5R EXTERIOR SIDE VAAROI?ERTYI EiPON1EB POLETO iERpR SIDE YARD SETBACK �IYTFITII:±Ii C�ff��'-R�I.AT��'------- .�'yq}y'yY IIySy1 SIW 11 R.511 Aa .k '--------� (IMAGE CORRIpplly BE UNDERGROUND, ' Ix•L 11%v MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 25'-0' TYP FOOTSIDEYOVER RD SETBACK MINIMUM S'-0'STTBAXIMUM SETBA K F10'4 RIGHT-OF-WAY PER PARCEL MAP FOOT OVER 17'-0' IN BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 10'-0" 1" 132190'(132759) RS R3 AVENUE SO Common Area C.I.W.Don, 41Br APIC PIRI,my CIII- vARK1Ne G... -II Area Area (BE) Unit Type Unit Na Bed, Oty Area(BE) Tolal(BE) Cry ppRN1NG LBGEND PER Lp51C960.26D(K)BY-RrGHT PARKING INCENTNE, THE AIO Iscl 1,�jLp110e 1-Bed Aparlmenl 1A-ADA 1 29 613 19,51] ADA G ADA ACCESSIBLE STANDARD PARKING SPACE(9' X 19') aS AISLE DEVELOPMNG ARKING RAT105 SHALL APPLY TO THE ENnRE CLUBHOUSE RESIDENTACTIVITY 97B 1-Ded Aparlmenl 1A-STD 1 31 6]3 20,863 ENT( IACIECMGMARKET-RATEUNITS) Bmg01 (3-S10RV; 1"76 16965FPEIRFLUOR ADAVAN 2 ADA VAN =ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING SPACE (4%19')+B'AISLE NRS SPACE PER UNn REQUIRED Bldg 02 2 O 1R,79R 98995FPER FLOOR FRI Riser MECHANICAL 12 1-Bnd Aoa.l1 1B-ADA 1 44 ]55 33,220 I-BRU (-STRY' C 2B C = COMPACT PARKING SPACE (115' X IV) 2-BR UNn3 LS SPACES PER UNITREQUIRED Bldg GYM RESIOENTACTIV ITY ]25 1-Betl Aparlmenl 1B-STD t fi2 ]ss 06810 d903 (3.STORV; 37.218 12A1G 5F PER FLOOR CC 4 CC=COVERED COMPACT PA0.KING SPACE (BS%t1,5N HALL CIRCULATION 136 2-Bed Apahmenl 2A-ADA 2 34 960 320UMNIMBldg 04 (263-STO9Y) 35300 Ig00]sF PER FLOOR (GROUND ZOOa nND SECOND STORY) ] B15F 1HIRO STORv HK SERVICE 36 2-Betl Aparlmenl 2A-STD 2 52 R60 49920 CP 2R1 [P=COVERED STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9%19) 1 GU EST PARKING SPACES FOR COMNUNTTYBUIIDING Bldg 05 (2-STORY) 1$443 11225E PER FLOOR Olfice ADMINISTRATION 290 "1 2S2 IlIxim F.4a �'� 'A =F REEVPARKINGSPACE I9'x I?) Bldg 06 (2-STOaY; 21,809 IQ 8855E PER FLOOR W6X1p6N 19L Irt ureN FEV ADA 1 FEV ADA TU UTURE EV A9A PARKING SPACE 9' %T9 S AISLE PARKING SPACES In[C� ea•t• �u�—� IB s.r ,F GAG�.Lid Pool RETENTION BASIN 1.343 ( 7* Bldg 07 O-STORv; 27,430 9, Ia, sP PER aoDR FBPSVA Pool Deck TERRACE 7,094 FEV VAN I VArl=NiuRE EV VAN PARKING SPACE f9'x19; +6'AISLE to pr^ •r, �•�� BH 0B 3P SF PER FLOO R25(WITHOUT AREA INCREASEI ALDULATONs 263 PARKIM1'G SPACES PEF UNIT PRWIOEO 9 psTURY; 84,114 I =10 FEETALLOWED Pool Equip MECHANICAL 186 DsuslTYc G 6i c�WRAGE srnNDngD PARKING SPACE il0 x2o) g (bSTOR 16,114 91DS15F PER FLOOR R aASE GYIAIM1. 16,yALAlEI V L6tliRACNY • It' rA9E UMIA BN 09 RR RESTROOMS t24 MIALIW1f PR46 BeatOMM, MY 1 = L ARKINGSPACE(9'XN) 295 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR UNITS B 10 1 BE FLOOR fm Cle[aa nLWW.[6OK 4ltMIPfaAO']aOupFplrL6$ Shower RE STROOMS BB P S Qu1 Idg (2-siO6v; 16.225 a Lr 6u 50'/_DENSITY BONUS IS BEING PROPOSED P 89 - TAODAIRp PARKING SPACE (9'%14)(A%iT) SII KIMdI01AFtpIL 9lAlTC RR11etT1 BIdg11 1-STORY` 17.163 65625E PER FLOOR �'-`A Spa RETENTION BASIN 93 uyACI[rL•% L,AlnxyACII,E •rp P3gll0.1@p NMif Ifm Rxs (WITHOUTAnFAINCREASE) St., SERVICE Ill CIBbI ... (PSTORY; 3.226 =4 STORIFSALLOWEO 3i1t1 fFL tlp1AR1Y Fp w6 Re r1P FAFEIFIirT M,n 1C Fk W [16�AII: Po.1 E 'Net Bar CIRCULATION 36 COLIC UNITS BASED ON LOMC 960260 DENSITY BONUS PERCENTAGES, T 1r11 N13L RlaS:'IC tPAf157.09IOTG 9Ni0. (I -STORY) 206 uNCOVEREU STANUARp PARKING SPACES: 90 PACES MCID11.1 I FEV SPACES 256199s K lj_pE.K-6 'NH MECHANICAL 12 9 11294s N A4.M-rR uOFFHRn; 1'SO VIRITS UNCOVERED COMPACT PAFKIN'GSPAC-4 26 SPACES INCLUDES SPACES R-25MBABDIOUTHEIGHTINCREASE) q 1l4gr[IrGASEB;yF.r'A6•Fr139MLSS 6 5 INCLUDES FEV SPACES Yu [t, CARACAT S11UA41 I"ItIIF/!OAM PACES INCLUDES R8 ACES P =36,6085E PER FLOORALLOWED DAX1VUNITS LLOWED WI DENSITY BONUS 251 LLI. lODINICF IAAI(M9YE6' SPACES INCLUDES 0 NFPA13 s NINKLER SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH CBC SECTION 903111 CLrlpruATSipNi n3(RYL9 s INCLUDES 0 FEV SPACES TOTAL PATIOAREA 6,6535E GARAGE STANDARD PARKING SPACES 56 SPACES INCLUDES 1 FEW SPACES TOTAL ELcorIY ARFJ, N•(Ml sF M LC STAIR LANDwrsl CAe^=Ed==E55BALl`!{%IrCiSN' 1 sHLY77imF5_.9J11LID1�.S Ip.AI `: 11G S xs M RAIMKi •JSI PA IRWINH PARTNERS ■ a R c 245 IT -her Avenue, N.le B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 plat ss]z44e w,ipaoc,com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La OD inta, California 92253 00 6PIT IN. � A ��Site Plan n �/p y.Sj• • 1'�' Y Site Plan Al PROJECTNO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 21014 La Qwnla SO V2 587 A.A6A. "- 16-A r'Ay1DA IA• -A A ADA f6-A .. .. � I�.v ' n Adl ' fA v4 � • `� 6LDG-Z' 4 7A-All BLgG II 16'•A •ADA I" •ADA SB-A z I F 1 � A+ADX .1By� �� �A;4 � I TB'• ar •xir -aLx. LEGEND PROPOSED ENCLOSURE LOCATION FOR METERS AND SWITCHGEAR EQUIPMENT •0I PA WIN PARTNERS A C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, SO. B-2 C.- Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2440 —lip ....... A4CMIFCIIIItp 444x1,11mci ►A 01 f0 fA AO 1 ►4ADA ! 5A AO 1 -ADA A.ADA S �_ „ b • 3 LY A n. BLDGGI• F 18�A y1gA I 7AJ10 +4Pq �ANw - 11 -ADA ��' N •� 4} 18 -A ADA 16 .A tnsn� o - lT-ADd18.RP a _ 6LOG 9�� C�•r 18•A i -APA 11•R l AVA Ana . ill AFRO r .1 w.1V BLDG ft 11fY BLDG E 6.140.47 >Tu yDA a-R 8LOt3 i La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Ouinta, California 92253 1WFirst Floor Plan SCALE: 1132"= 1'-0' TYP. FIRE RISER ENLARGED PLAN SCALE: 112" = 1'-0" First Floor Plan A2 PROJECT NO:21014 588 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 21014 La Quints SO V2 11A1.2ln<J. Mfl STO •_LT 1A-9T,A, I� VI., .Rr RikY ,...TR 0 f. BELOW L ROOF r9- ta.$n- �:sr0 M -ST 1AS'� 'A -STD 18 S I$SIPA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C S 24S R,,hh r Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (7141 SS1244B w iReaacam ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING M 1s .S Z Ah4171 1AS R3T0 1146u i-+ NyTa �¢LDGG a " 1Ad i7i $ $TO 1t1 TS $�4 .n>r •rt. u1n �v La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 towUK .qp 1 $LI1G 9 1 $Yr 1$.8 ry aWSecond Floor Plan SCALE: 1/32"= V-0' Second Floor Plan A3 PROJECT NO: 21014 GOA PLOT DATE: SM2023 589 21014 La Quinta SD V2 I PA IRWIN PARTNERS C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, SUR. 81 C.I. Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 www ipeoC cnam ARCHITECTURE PLANNING NSULTING s3 s I 1. aE� •a,U aL "IR MA La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quints, California 92253 aWThird Floor Plan SCALE: 1132'= 1'-0' Third Floor Plan A4 PROJECT NO'21014 590 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 21014 La Quints ED V2 -"� ,� � BLDsr •• . 1 BLDO 1 K i .7 111 ROOF ® BELOW LIE C: L7 �� w BLDG Tw t [li3 ay.w 13 T— r� BLDG S 0 SOLAR READY ROOF: NO DIMENSION LESS THAN T-0" LEGEND EACH SUBAREA MUST BE AT LEAST 160 SF IF TOTAL ROOF AREA EXCEEDS 10,000 SF SOLAR READY ZONE SOLAR ZONE ON STEEP SLOPED ROOFS MUST BE ORIENTED BETWEEN 110 AND 270 DEGREES OF r ' TRUE NORTH, ORIENTATION DOES NOT APPLY ON ROOFS SLOPED LESS THAN 2:12 I 1 HVAC CONDENSERS MUST BE FREE OF ROOF PENETRATIONS AND ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT ������...... ••• MIN, 15%OF TOTAL ROOF AREA IS REQ'D TO BE SOLAR READY, EXCLUDING ANY SKYLIGHTAREA FIRE ACCESS, 4'-0" CLEAR MIN. TOTAL ROOF AREA: 119,225 SF SOLAR READY MINIMUM: 15% OF TOTAL ROOF AREA SOLAR READY MIN. REQUIRED: 17,883.25 SF SOLAR READY PROVIDED: 17,884 SF IPAIRWIN PARTNERS d C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, SWW B-2 C-a Mesa CA 92526 (714)5572448 .... r ARCHITECTURE CG s PLANNING TILTING NOTE: - PER DESERT SAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, PARAPETS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF FIVE FEET TALLTO SCREEN/HIDE HVAC EQUIPMENT - SEE SHEET A21 FOR LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAMS - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN JOINT APPENDIX JA11 (2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE) -SOLAR READY ZONE MAYALSO BE LOCATED ON CARPORTS, FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La auinta, California 92253 i sLnra 1a .. i 1 � L• 5 BLDG 9 a a11D Roof Plan SCALE: 1132-= 1'-0- Roof Plan A5 PROJECT NO: 21014 591 PLOT DATE: W7/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 SECOND & THIRD FLOOR UNITS - STANDARD ZA2 Bed - Standard dCME.,q• . 2❑2 Bed -ADA Lf 1SGALE: W • 1'� •IPA IRWIN PARTNERS ■ ■ A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite 8-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 1714/557244R wineoc... ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 1 Bed 1 - Standard B7CAaF •.a - I..I GROUND_ FLOOR UNITS -ACCESSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH CBC 11AACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 1B1 Be1d-ADA kw 1 Bed - Standard 1A- 1 r1uJ1LEq 1 Bed 1!i' • i'-0' Unit Plans A6 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 592 SCHEME-1: m M. •IPA 6RWIN F PF. ARTNERS ■ R C I T 5 ■ 245 Fischer Avenue, Suile B-2 C.- Mesa CA 92626 I714I 557244HB w,ipaoco Ns A RCHITEL TII RE ANNING nLTING aW 1 SCALE.IClubhouse V POOL DECK EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYR La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quint., California 92253 STUCCO 1 DUNNEDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EO, STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR ECL STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR Ea STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. 04Clubhause - North Elevation gf:wlE: fM' • Yq' -• _ SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EO, STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EO. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. 03Clubhouse - South Elevation STUCCO LZ Ix- - 11-tr DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR Ea @•fur M.M.0 "1md SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. I� STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. 02Sub" ouse - East Elevation (Pool Deck) yCALE :f � t G EXTERIOR LIGHT, IYP, BROWN TYP 01 Clubhouse - West Elevation (Entry) SCALE: 114' = 1'-0' STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR ECL STUCCO 4 OUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR ECL ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING OR EU. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM- COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD Clubhouse A7 PROJECT NO 21014 593 PLOT DATE: 617/2D23 21D14 La Ouinla SD V2 j0IPAnRWIN PARTNERS R C H I T E C T 9 245 F—h., Avenue, SWW B-2 Cosla Mesa CA 92626 (7 14)557244R ww ipaaC com R ARCHITECTURE ANNING GN SULTING T.Q .Lp i I —aT6e:— C REGLET Bldg7 - WesI Elevation 04�W ."V La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 Le Quinta. California 92253 Y I I _ � I V- AI', N RECESSED NICHE 3RMdq 1 - $auth Elevation FIRE RISER L}IUGCO RFIUEI O�WWI -East Elevation 01 Bldg 1 - North Elevation .GIE. 1M• • 'IV SCHEME1, STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ, STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: -- STUCC01 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ, STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. ■STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME 3; STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR Eq. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR:BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING r MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD Bldg. 1 - Elevations A8 PROJECT NO:21014 594 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 21014 La QuiRla SO V2 •I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer A--, SUI Ie R-2 C.- Mesa CA 92626 (714)5572446 w.ipso —, n RGR11LETu;[-LA"R4NO CONIXUk TIIIO MI'1=I� 03Bldg 2 -South Elevation SCM.F- toe' - — GE 2 s n 1 ., 04 Bldq 2 -West Elevation1d- EMERIOR LIGHT, TYR FRENCH DOOR r- La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 o9-Bldg 2 - East Elevation SCALE 1hr • 11w 0 Bldg 2 - North Elevation 9 - Al . 14 SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, STUCCO 4 DUNNEDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNNEDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ, STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING OR ECL VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM- COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR:TBD Bldg. 2 - Elevations A9 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE 677/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 595 SCHEME1, BUILDING 3-1 EI PA nRW1N PARTNERS ■ R C E C T 5 245 F—h-Avenue, S." B-2 Cosla Mesa CA 92626 (714)5572'44B ww.iPaV 7 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING -TING BUILDING 3-2 L;.r1L-';QREGLET L, LBEGORATIVE •NFIfi1000Y E%TERbR L1GHi-IP La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 — — —Oi±! 00 04Bfdg 3 -West Elevation Overall ScniE Y1Y % i-d' O Bld3-1 -West Elevation — sr�ue: 11!• . rN 0.4vn-YAz i Mill � � 1 �•rm rrezrrn—� �e�ms-x necLrsoka.�•a slUccn.g6EET O//Bldg. 3 - Soulh Elevation LSCACE: IIF' 1'-0' �wr•rlwv Oil ._—�f-- aFlR4ASNII -�.710— e%r[a14a WH r, TVR 01 Bldg 3-2 - West Elevation SCALE JW • P-T STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR Ea STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EO, STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EO, STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR ED. -RCHEME2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR ED. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EO. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR ED. AC HEMS I STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS OE5207 EGYPTIAN SAND. OR CO, STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR ED. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, ■STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR TBD Bldg. 3 - Elevations A10 PLOT3DATE : 6/7/2023 596 21014 La Ouinta SO V2 IPAIRWIN PARTNERS R C H T F C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA —H (➢14)592449 w,ipao�com A R CHITECTORE PLANNING CO NSOLiING RI III nlNr 3-1 RI III nlNr, 3-9 .�[[4r CgLaR 16� .o-ram La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Ouinta, California 92253 COVERED OVSO ER REED $- mud Fl- -Ir //jj 81dg 3 -East Elevation Overall — — — — 1 U ' . ii "lii 9 `NIT —w. uc� !Y[fYM IIOM T- R K TYP 03$ldg 3-1- East Elevation SfJu E. I rr - L-A' .� � 0.rtr0'L1e 779-41--u- ,ST.[. NICHE L-STUCCO REGLET 02Bldg 3 - NVh Elevation $SAtE 1!3 1'�Q' 01 Bldg 3-2 - East Elevation SCALE 1W • ra STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN. OR EQ SCHEME 2: STUCCO I DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ STuccD z DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING. OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIR. COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANOR TBD COLOR: TBD Bldg. 3 - Elevations All PROJECT NO: 21014 CJ97 PLOT DATE: 6/72023 21014 La Ouinla SO V2 j&VI PA 1RWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suile B-2 C.- Mesa CA B2626 1, 1415572444E www.ip...c... ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CDNSULTING RIIII nwn.4-1 RIM nING 4-9 asa� 34 0 Bldg 4 - West Elevation ]:1:�1E 1w • 1'd La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La QUinta. California 92253 evatlon Overall U-14=ALE.a52-- vim• 0Bldg4-1 - North Elevation 3�ALF,f- . 1W - 7G- films` O�Bldg 4 -East Elevation srJ�I!i• r-0- 01 Bldg 4-2 - North Elevation SCALE Is' - 1'•6- SCHEME1: STUCCOl DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EO. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. Cr HEME 2� STUCCO I DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ, tt STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEMES: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS 0E6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR:BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD Bldg. 4 - Elevations Al2 PROJECT NO: 21014 G(10 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 598 21014 La Quinta SD V2 •IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, S,H. B-2 C.- Mesa CA 92626 I714I 557 2440 w.i p... —m ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING wrra rlmu� rrmrE.o r,ccexac«G« — - 2 «ass zr 0 Bldg 5 - South Elevation J—ClDAI L up• • 1'A• 0-rr4- •n+• - _ -00 � «xs --�_ — L___ � ■■ � _L.II_I Y• I a T fH amp •1r � � _ .•.era r ++ IIuc Rlxx xc:rxnr,rr� sruccuru:oael Bld� 5 -1N st Elevation �4rtC IF ,3 :.�. _ — rg P� r.w re.. w mrwv - II.G:55F9rwrr aryr-'cu RFrulr Bldg 5 -East Elevation D�Bld �5 — IIIIjjII La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 1 Bldg - North Elevation North Elevation O 1 SCALE JW . 1'd SCHEME I - STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN. OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ, KRL� 14" STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ, STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ- ACCENT- ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING OR Ea VINYL DOORS A WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM• COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD Bldg. 5 - Elevations A13 PROJECTN0:21014 G!1!1 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 599 21014 La Quinta SD V2 i• I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, SWA B-2 C,sI. Mesa CA 92626 (714I5572440 w .iP...... ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING w —u-'s W.W 0 - I® -l�1 " 110�1111 GII a II "alillion I :: �i III II Vl ill���ll V lilllfll iVllil 1?JIII] I[III J IIII I1�IIIII �� II�III n[ii luirlrri' — J�I[Ill�q� �i I-r.n�rcu rrmv� �-GCCOIIAINL !%Ik11pR Lplll. M- is yr4. nBidg-6 - West Elevation 4$ra %w - vil, 6wfi SIKCII RWIi L. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La auinta, California 92253 L-TL STLA,U PAINTED BLACK, TYP O3Bldg 6 - Souih Elevation srru[: 1m• r.o• N v� 1 i RECESSED- FIRERISEft STUCCOU..uw o 19 6 -fast Elevation ac�Lc 9p' • ,: xI IRTI.1 IY wyy, Fl1 nTb' -Cl[Yl uJllJu __v To Ai`^l NFloor -rim Ill fll PIAC ILA liA PAINTEEDD BBLACK ttP o 1 Bldg 6 - North Elevation SCALE 115' "' 01 SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ t STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: --+ STUCCO DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT. OR EQ SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ ACCENT, ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. VINYL DOORS IL WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR:BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD Bldg. 6 - Elevations A14 PROJECT NO: 21014 COO PLOT DATE: 6172V 023 21014 La Quinla SD V2 IRWIN PARTNERS O IPA A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fi—., Avenue, Salle B-2 C.— Mesa CA 92626 (71415572"" wipaoc.com •ri �.rifkL fy M1! •L{yy Na caaeuLlrw l: I T.O. PL f — .ri T0. PLC � TOPL FIREFISER ! Lft-C*Pe0 NICHE Lsr�(p ykWy, 0Bldg 7 - South Elevation 4s� W . ,'d' La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quints, California 92253 rIL•L•L_:� O3 �j Bldg 7 - West Elevation SCM1- 4 . I,.. , 0 Bldg 7 -North Efevatfon 14- • 1 a g v� _raw E, 1µg oam INI I+ �.sr Floor 1 0 1 Bldg 7 - East Elevation SCAtF-1w . V• SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ, STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR Eq. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR Ea STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: ' STUCC01 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. SUNNED 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DES207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EC, STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR ED, STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNNEDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR:BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR: TBD Bldg. 7 - Elevations A15 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 601 • IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A B C I I I E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, —1,, B-2 C-1. Mesa CA 92626 p,al ss� 2446 w �""com ■RL HIT�G/YfE MLRIIn111,3 CVNYULrIH6 EXTERIOR LIGHT, TVR. —!N "L ". _ r2AL.va�r rrcr,ise�ucw �Ixe :nyN—TWcw"EQ0 0 4Idg 8 . South Elevation - Btdg 8 West Elevation Q3MLE ,D PR ,� r _P 1 L,g1.119LDHICHE Lit-,.,t 7Bldg 8 - North Elevation —r— t .fin® �--- � � �� .lsN■I�, i.� �� .�lil�l-I _ �l�...:� ,� �IIIIIiffVG;li;ii� � 9lllMlllllll i3111�11111� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II�I�il�l'lli.i!- ■II�Y�II CROWN.:.. _ i it i_._ -- I�I �! ! : !.I = = ��IYn� iiuIGV,UnII� __I���I a 1 B l_dg r La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 SCHEME,: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EO, STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EG. SCHEME 2: r STUCCO, DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. 11 STUCCO 2 DUNNEDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ, STUCCO 3 DUNNEDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT- ALLSCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ- VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR:BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD Bldg. 8 - Elevations A16 PROJECT NO: 21014 �`02 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 v 21014 La Quin[. SD V2 SCHEME STUCCO 1 ,..zrrt I -17 -F 1. ......I' L RECESSED NICHE CiuLI:v,COit' 0 Bldg 9 - East Elevation erne ur • r-3, Bldg 9 South Elevation 031,,..:, Bld� 9 - West Elevation O(wjTS Adl— w • 1'4F O 1 Bldg 9 - North Elevation SCALE: IW • 1'.V DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: -_� STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS OE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT- ALLSCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR: TBD •IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 9 - Elevations MOSA R C H IT E C T S Troutdale Village, I_I_c. A17 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 C,,Ia Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 1714) 5572448 ww.,vae....m La Quints, California 92253 603 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PROJECT N0:21014 PLOT DATE: 6l7/2023 21014 La Quinla SD V2 iIPAIRWIN PARTNERS A n C H I T E c T s 245 Fischer Avenue, SW le B-2 Cesla Mesa CA 92526 (714)5572448 ww-ip— ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING ti-STUCC011[olEi 4-}11dE ti1l>III.aM �Vlgvi'Mg10bN tiENGHDOOR .. r • i . I .- i TYP FRENCH 1•A1111Eew ••i TYP Fgq 03Bldg 10 - South Elevation ?3mr: tot- • t•�• 04BIdg IR rn 10 - West Elevation srLd La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 02Bldg 10 - East Elevation scar.e' 1m• - r4r 01 Bldg 10 - North Elevation 3".E: 1W • 1-0 SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY. OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DES204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN. OR EQ. SCHEME 2: 1 STUGG01 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ, I STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK. OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE. OR EQ ISTUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT. OR EQ SCHEME 3- STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE5034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR:TBD Bldg. 10 -Elevations A18 PROJECT NO: 21014 604 PLOT DATE 61712023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 •I PA IRWIN PARTNERS AR C H I T E C T 5 245 Fischer Avenue, SWI, 9-2 C-1, Mesa CA 92625 1,14, 5572448 wiP. -c ANCHrTCC rVnt •(—NWNo CoNaut r.N0 ;r.(N 114,(i,11 TYP PAINTED BLACK, TYP. rm.ti'rlf [IODaL 03adp 11 - West Elevation TJ`1i C. r+1 . r'-0' 0481dg 11 - 5aulh Elevation .zr4r �T41LL[]rwe HISEH w--xec["--ACHE �y LNMA+N 0 Bldg 11 - North Elevation -------------- tflArtl'..111, �� �����; oi� iii �� I I I ONE iiijllllil!�III�IIII JII Ill�3�ui�ulll li .ai r��mi ii��orli� iir L�mi Lvm,�" LrgrcNrx ' L_stoc=IWLFF Lrr,u 5,, KAK,wa r.Yrprl ]N!KYd TYP •KlaCND PAIwiED.—K.-P La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 01 Bldg # 7 - East Elevation SCJLLE1w • 1'.r DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR Eq. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN. OR EQ. SCHEME 2- STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS OE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE5204 TRITE WHITE, OR E(3 STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DETS97 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME 31 STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE0207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR Ea STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS O68OU RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT- ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING OR EQ. VINYL DOORS A WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR:TBD Bldg. 11 -Elevations A19 PROJECTNO'21014 605 PLOT DATE 677/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 Tyl Tr ,ash Enclosure Plan 14�:ALF s , - 2 Second Fbo, erm��'n�s� HIM, :: i �Rwf.It�rrif��Ir�rf,Rrf�,�r�ryi f reii� y�lrsl�w�INllww 1 Typical Trash Enclosure Right Elevation 3V:ALE XIw- 'iw- 1,1R.IcV rash Enclosure Left Elevation SGSLE: y t4' . 1'tl' I,sI HLnr Pool -Equip. Side Elevation 11�I:ALL' 111V- I'V .1,. y a? .. ry ,;wGaa.; � Rrerc.ax,- r.Asl c,.u-1 w 4.o.+4u uwxe X 1 nTypicalTrash Enclosure Front Elevation 'ar�LE'YIM1•= 1-0• 10, iR�R„AfA�r E><I i11IfM UGIr 11m. 07Pool Equip. Front Elevation SCAS-R-SNr- I'•0' 04Typical Carport Side Elevation SCALE: IH.' 1'L' • _ - I PON MLE[Rd. nAv.I fflm ea lesu pq Ivc L1 r� I i aft' 2 6e�d Fbor I fff]]] *an, eut PECGRIMLI EMERIOR LIGHT, TYP 0 nTypical Trash Enclosure Rear Elevation SCAIE YI6•• ,'{r' 0 Typical Garage Plan SCAL@ MIq'• 5'q' REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES 031ypical Carport Plan AAE Y1Ra a I4, i-1HRLl AiPRpPFRT' LINE F— -- --r 11 -- --------------- - ----�- --- ----- -- --------- ..�_____.___ 3w E O�Typical Gana eq Left Elevation SGI£ 31SR' • 1', an 2 Sewntl Fbor I' 1 ,r IMCOtIrryE 1 .., ..r .xTL+IONxIIUIr, rn. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES 05T !cal Gara a Right Elevation SL.4F Y,V, 1S REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES 02Typical Garage Rear Elevation SALE: vtq• , P-0, . REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES 01 Typical Garage Front Elevation SCALE :w16' • TO' .-�- jolIPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Exterior Elevations A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A20 245 FisnherAvenee• S.U. B-2 C.— Mesa CA S2.26 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (]t4) 55] 244R www.iPeuc.cum La Quinta, California 92253 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PROJECTN0:21014 606 PLOT DATE: 6/7/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 02 View of Building 1 with Building 2 and putting green in background. 01 View of clubhouse from Washington Street main entry. t q } Bird's-eye view of property- •IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I f E C T 3 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Casla Mesa CA 92626 (714(5572448 w,ipaogcom ARCHITEcruRE-ANNiNc co NsuLriNc 0_ View of pool area and shade structure R �._ .1 LEGEND //�� •L � aURflp1G NUMRE ----•V . - _� %X VIEW NUMBER R Key Plan 07 View of Buildings 3 & 4- La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 04 View of garages and carports at north side of property 05 View of rear courtyard with shade structure in center and surrounded by buildings 7-11, OB View of carports near building 8. 3D Views A21 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 6/7@023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 607 10 View on Washington Street with deceleration lane on far left. See location of view on sheet A21 Key Plan. Scheme 1 DE6242 Wells Gray Stucco DE fi341 Vulcan Accent Stucco VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS & FENCING TUBE STEEL, OR SINL COLOR: BLACK TRASH ENCLOSURES CMU WALLS METALROOF METAL GATES GARAGES SEE SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES •IPA IRWIN PARTNERS ■ A R C F. T F. .. T a ■ 245 Fischer Avenue, SUIIe 8-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 1, 14) 557244a w.ip-N,—m R ARCHITECTURE ANNINc CONSULTING Desert Sage Apartments Paint Schemes Color Board DUNN- EDWARDS PAINTS Scheme 2 Scheme 3 0 DE 6172 DE 6207 Bungalow Taupe Egyptian Sand Stucco Stucco L= -10 E DET 597 DE 6034 Shadow Effect Raisin In The Sun Accent Stucco Accent Stucco CARPORTS BY OTHERS STEEL SUPPORTS & METAL ROOF, OR SINL PICNIC AREA SHADE STRUCTURES BY OTHERS TBD POOL AREA CABANAS BY OTHERS TBD All Schemes DET 674 Gunnysack Stucco 2 DE 6204 Trite While Accent Stucco 2 DE 6390 Chocolate Pudding Accenl/Trim 09 View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountains in the background. See location of view on sheet A21 Key Plan. P r e"• rr„ ��r OB View of entry access on Avenue 50. 0� See location of view on sheet A21 Key Plan. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 3D Views & Materials Board A22 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE 6/7/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 ■ i C =It 11 VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDINGS 1 & 2 �1 nar hi I^r. w VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDING 4 & CLUBHOUSE AIMIRWIN PARTNERS R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, S,Hl B-2 C.,I, Mesa CA 92626 Ii'415ht zsw w.w.ipmcoa„ AX9R11�C tUNF ✓•l'W"'No COM4WL'Ima ... u a .•rc•.w:M crwv'w�l .zro 4a y I ' Tom`----•—: --- — __^�__ — a-0 , M-m' �'A�HIMgiplf.irRe ET .... ..-..-.-. � I11111 en.- 1�pN!►�1r 7rllb NNtiHfClNn�.-. I �-Lui1::i•.ii sl9eN�1LK - r O LINE OF IGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET TOWARDS AVENUE 50 scuE.+1s- . Sro• wr a •rr a 1,WM/iRAtl4r+rt4f .------ •-_.. -.-...... �-... -...5 S•.-----.-- '•e.:`�.-...-..._ _-______ _________---_- �--.,-.. _-- - _ -_ WASHINGTON STREET ' �.' f.-_....,•n14.^a::•n-:....-_-..f_...-`---••---_•-'_-;ii lr.h nl:l:-_�-...-,.."Y-.pia.-...J... r,ul.uN�11A1.1 �� T^ 'r�• . -- -=-- ----- - ----- - - --- ---- -- " .---.-...----...---........---' nuu��v.c, r�T.Mre,l �.cw souBhlnM,,, Er�dc+xG H1 n'xmexhue Ncwuw.:..ur VIEW FROM AVENUE 50 - BUILDINGS 5 & 6 La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quints, California 92253 02LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET SME- sw . 1•.p• 1• .err} o1 LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - AVENUE 50 Line of Sight Diagrams A23 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE, 6/7/2023 21014 La Ouinla SD V2 4o d PF7r 2 Na•�• it -W4' r A •rr a sr a • 0 0 0 .01I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A G H I T E C T 6 245 Fischer AvenuGuivel Avenue, Wile B-2 Ce Mom CA 92626 []Ie]55];L16 xvw ip�v�cvm VACANT r VACANT 07 _ LOT 7 Property Line 17'-0" 10'-101, . 7�-0. L Average 6alanas at homes — Residence on Saguaro Road Drive Aisle Parking Space Landscape, 1— 31 Feet Wide Uncovered Existing CMU Block Wall Fence Assumes 6' High Fencing Less than 2.5 Feet Visible Assumes 6' High Fencing from Neighbor's Backyard La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, Caldomia 92253 VACANT LOT UTILITI' Site Sections A24 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7r26Q023 21014 La Oui nta SD V2 From BS Gernges, pin 610 - r '. I��d �����I�il �����! �����1��" ������tii� ����� ��I��"���� ����� Y. ���4b�i���ll�►d ����l�I��������� ���l��I�dQ .' TOP �7y apt �p a�qq trt A ■! ■ p : �t�11i w yy = ��L Lr�cSs� Lii . • s' j . •s is 4 •'1 c Ci�` �c.3w �Y�+!ai wilr'i�-"r' i © _ W a�i Lti O 0 :OI PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 2AS F-w Il—... G-. H-: _eslA MCu CA 4=G26 (714) 557 2445 —Ip.oc cam ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING a 1 reec vvlue Less than 2 5 Fee! 'Jiseb e Assumes 5'High Fencing from Neighbors Backyard Less than 2 5 Feet Visible Assumes 6' High Fencing from Neighbor's Backyard La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 Site Sections A25 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 725=3 21 Di La Gunla SD V2 From BS GaraOes.pin 611 O IPA IRR PARTNERS ■ A C H I T E C T S 245 Fiwher Avenue• Guile 8-2 Caele Mew CA 92526 (SAr 724 6 ww 1. -C 4un R_. _.,��R� =i,ir+1 uo corns uilIIc VACANT � VA CAA'7 Lo1 o I F=t vv1u0 Less than 2.5 Feet Visible Assumes 6' High Fencing from Neighbor's Backyard ►--Property Line — Residence on Saguaro Road 31 Feet Wide Uncovered "S-- to " "" ---- "�" ' `- -- Assumes 6' High Fencing La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 Site Sections A26 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7252023 21014 La Ouinla SD V2 From as Gara0e pin 612 -1 E I ------_ y ----_---------J-------------- I 3 -------------------------------------------L I q I 5 L 8 L Or`l CLIENT: i i i i i i (—AL)`' THE ALTUM GROUP �ii� 72140MAGNESIA i E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 RANCHO MIRANGE, CA92270 I LIGHT POLE DETAIL FOR STAMP ® • GE GARAGE GARAGE RAG GARAGE � GARAGE GARAGE NTS AOI GE r,�G. aF ,tiE �,R°�GR..:hE�1 a°,,r� —�„-�-,.—�.,,�-- ^ -•- ^r'a � D �• • PRBIPT�BAB BLDG E3 ° • rooTPR NT k 17 ',� x I I °•_"�.'.� ^ aT.�..° PARKER TPPAD 1.0 FF ' DEVELOP MENT NW �RWASHINGTON STREE T o BLDG. ji I �•°F AND AVENUE 50 ° ° • , °' • ` °' PAD=53 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 � G UNITG j • § °°TPRINT.°,+ CARPORT LIGHT DETAIL ® T GREE — II � I � Na NTS 6 IR— • •J CLUB • HOUSE i C � I � PAo=s2.D BLDG 3 j x PAD 53 0 - t. I © r S• BLDG q !® o PAD 51 0 t 8 � °oP�sE III =-. .FOO o I C — ISSUANCE: B I _ Tw.BH roi ,.» roi k DATE DESCWPNON w • ° qr - BLDG.. — BLDG. 5 PAD=52.0 — +. _ PAD=SONS BTu�z.° TPR�NT ' � • • z�sroary su zsroari u rs EoomRwr-a.°w:sE o0 DATE: 11.10.2022 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY'. CHECI4=Dar: GLffR t --� L.,��' A VL rry , _-----_ i ---_ w iw SHEETTRLE: FWA ,• � __ __________________________________________mow -- No SITE LIGHTING PLAN �a SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.0 GALE , =3GL E NORTH 613 :E_ SHEETNO'. om 1 2 3 4 5 r E1.0 S I 0 00� 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 L 6 L Or It m 1 a; I � enpineerinp eoneulbnb _--L---— ------- — — — — — — — — — — — ----------- ---ti —— � ---—__---__e-- CLIENT: > m oesen, cA 9ul I THE ALTUM GROUP Q E ��iiii �ii �� �ii� i �� ii i �i i i 72140 MAGNESIA �i �ii ���i i �ii i ii i i i i ii i ii ii o E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 / % � %/� �/ / / ��j �/ /�� /�/ % % ❑ � /� j� � FOR STPMP cARACE cARAce cARAce ..R.G. Kul � D n w. a \\ BLDG.10 PAD=5uN5 PAD=55.0 DEVELOPMENT NW ooTPRINT oTPRINT aoN=:F WASHINGTON STREET ao.'S' / NpE E9 c i AND AVENUE 50 DG. 1 D=53 III 1II UNIT.INT sT Bo�, / / I LA QUINTA, CA 92253 / / 1 4,,; / / RxnBE E 19„�.� — / CBE E4Tw1) o — BLDG. 8 I I PAD 54 5 —IIE me J'—r C C 3 3 wT // 49 r U/ F II a / � / — ISSUANCE: BLDG. 7 PAD 530 / / / / / / / nxn7rwc / / REVISIONS: GATE OESCIUPIION p w s N61 yTJ / / l / / o H . / /� / I,HyIH DATE: 11.10.2022 1 PROJECT NUMBER: =g —�� ----� 21.ALTG.003 F f------ GLIFR VL A « A a w /--------------------------- SHEETTRLE: SITE LIGHTING A. o� PLAN �a SITE LIGHTING PLAN E E1.1 CALE 1 =3BL NORTH 614 om SHEETNO'. E1.1 1 2 3 4 5 r J � E D C 0 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 �ii i P oDPO. a J., - GE GARAGE RAGE ,o RAG GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE a, II 3., AA .01' Va4 J. 3 3,F GARAGE .01. } a1s Z.o Z:a. .s 1A.z, Ppy 1 1 1 ZD A 1 ^ 1 1 A ?} A - a 1 1, s �� a z a ah z a P. z a ,-w rue s •,-'-A o 'w7 1 r ibiJ_ , PA ° ✓A '�3 12 Al 1 e-,eA f» ®x A A a s J J. A D a J o J k� P. .3z ~ -T ._ xa BLDG.2 0 '� 2zo.�a� x1 >� �0, 4 '� PAD 5 F6aA z. s BLDG 1 P P. ®3^bhz e'3 PAD 51 0 ® EoorowNr ,s a.s s o s 4 D z-sroR ,zo Nrs d" \ zs,oHr„e Grv,s 0 I o � .D � os sF� 12� -- \Zp JN J Aa 1 �,� y sP h Je J. J P ° J 1E. . z : _a; a.• • a BLDG.1 i. ,o .oQP 7 .3 PAD 53 s o P• ^Cj. 03. Z.��zJw� P J ,a.o Js Zs orvR NT s,o¢. sv o :. o �y,z �s 2�48�7&y4ys@ 9ar.. p ,4 �� ;� a ,LL 11 .'p . , _ _ o z3 so 4 , o , az 5G z a4 6 7s� z A3 ^�`�. <• 1, J 1 1 J F A2 u.. b a JJ a 1 zyti'J 1 z. J s z 21 a is z . 1-0 J 1 p.a 1� 1. j. s J 4 Js 1, Zs s }, J.4 e 1 .22 R 13doa 1 1 e p.• p. , r cLdB Pq D 5 as zs 1. ,V. FjoLWEp '.D z �.. F s a.D 1 , . J . �, .., fie x 00AIJ i4 - s } z h z. �.. a B J. . . P a z s a 1 s a 1 o z 1. q� . BLDG. 3 ,pax ,. J 1 �- A%77 J PAD 53 0 P P F,I �. ,f\ a o a 3 i .$i r , Wi.s J s 7 .e a.z L_ P �"bD3 .W 3 1s >o �°' -A _ J J. z ;z. orva Nr ,a.000x ,ys J.s Js z.r Al Js J o � � z P. J a 1 '-" g,�, ,e�a� vJ• ,o_�.1j _� }e ,.s�. 4 J }a F A. 1 P. - BLDG. 4 2 P .o.E4. PAD 51.0 RNT ,swo sv 1 AlJ oa P I 0 1 J P 9 ry s P 4 F 1 e AD A } Al 1 Zs .v� k J a•J 2• *' F P 3. 1. z 1, 1 a J F.e Jo J.z J a J s 1 3 1 F I J n J �. .11 T 9 p Z 22 ,z a }e a3 3 io ,a, .z e }s ,as i as o ao 3. 3 z� } ,.e . s g4�. a . 4 ^f31 z.. .az,}, 'aa. .sas}�.oas }•} �s ae z A. �a ,, }o �s.s4'� a. zo �.z�}: z.s a, z. s�}s z.9 i.z! J Js A. ' b p s a ,. .s , ,., „ o ,.o „ s .o ,o r ,. ., ,o cyy a. 4 a.o 1 13 10 . , J.a'A Zz Al ,., ,.z .s „ ,.a 1 Al 1.3 Zr Al1 1 ,.a .s z. z. J z.z 1, z. A. .a z z2 , D Do3 z , . }c_ 4 Z, J e Js Zo -Am } 14 z �➢d cs z k�5 1 A. a J z ,a 1 2+-3 }.__e ZAAi e99!'� .010 d° V1 z 1s .3 1 310 a } 2z a �1 Al1.9 F o �A1 P e .p 1 19 3 F o.s ,ys J.2 J.s J .a•J. J.4 M .s AD A. AD s 3., A s .o J.s ,.e.J. .1-1 ,rq .os a ao o" 9a 9 1 a, ? 00 P. Al ��. 13 }, s AD I e BLDG. Cl 1 ae ,_ 9 9 F F.o Ao AD , a.o AD BLDG •5 } a A.a A = PAD • PAD-52.0 a ..D P. P :T Ea3'".o.o D 3 w� J.N 1 As as ,J a. .1Aa roR rv, „nDo.s a.o*A AD ,oD AD AD ,oD AD AD oorvRirvT e,000is J.4 .z J. a.z Az oRpy.p;ry ,o., p.o p.o 10.0 A A 10.0 Ao ,o., Dim L 6 limp PLAN E1.2 CALF , =3DL NORTH L OrtmMr - engineering Doneulbnb THE ALTUM GROUP 72140 MAGNESIA E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 LA VUIN I A VILLAUt D APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT NW WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 C B REVISIONS: k I DATE I DESC—ON DATE: 11.10.2022 PROJECTNUMBER: 21.ALTG.003 ORAWNBY'. CHECI4=D BY: A GUFR VL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 615 SHEETNO'. C� 7 I I i 4 5 r 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 L 5 L Ortm �----------�--------------------------------------------- w �," I � o engineering wneulbnb _ ,a s aso �wm,m.w.�b — � — ---------I -- o---- --I — �� ��------_ _ ✓ �i J CLIENT: CLENT THE ALTUM GROUP E I o/ r 'gF pi _ I � 1 Q MAGNESIA E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 iiz �i/j// i / // / ���j � /ii // // / /ii //i// /// / // / /� � �/ /� /i /� / � / RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 / , / , / / / / / / / FOR STPMP Oj / /// 2 a a a J. '1 1. 213 D u- F'AKRtK BLDG 9 DEVELOPMENT NW L BLDG.10 A PAD 55 0 WASHINGTON STREET 9 PAD=53 5 a RINT-,.000 sT e „„ �, a• / / 1 AND AVENUE 50 J N°TPNNT a000.sT / / �xnaT Ems„, i LA QUINTA, CA 92253 A J A.2 SJ J.5 J 9B' 21 3 Wti CPWN y z /� nxnvc me I a < a K/1 BLDG. 8 �' a & J A J }� �* 3' i J 3 PAD 54 5 Y we�m.I A.��oft aPHN r 1 ° °/ ��� tv j I pgvJ 166UANCE: ° BOG . A a / PA530 D I �` > ,t / NxT,ne�+rmc src (rrr.) B S B + . , 1 a as f" , J. // a�4/44A6 J.7 a 11 11 2 sr.°z� / i4" / PEVISIONS: �n yf\ 'y a,�J�. qi k GATE OESCRON aiy; . ] A. ' J.. LJs 4J / o a., a.s ae az a- a ze a_sy a °L� MH 5 .o< A.a ♦ T ,, aT J a J. s,i, / / / PATE: 11.10.2022 21.AL—ECTG.00NU R: " 0 0 21.ALTG.003 M BY'. CHECIU=O BY: A GLIFR AH� A ,^� ' SHEETTRLE: SITE A& a i— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - — - PHOTOMETRIC �a SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ® PLAN E1.3 CALE , =3�L E NORTH 616 SHEETNO'. om , 2 3 4 5 r E1.3 J E D Q 0 N. - — �. — Mirada Medium Wall Sconce (X'AfM) Outdoor LED Wall Sconce 400k ®ffiI�� ®IK08 0 0 Slim Wall Pack (WPSLS) Small LED Slim Wall Pack �'2"®Mn 5 L 6 holm A. - dFresco-na Raew�aRae-11 _ oQ- Facts r w LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'BA' AND -BB' (MOUNT AT 20' A.F.F.) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE BC- (MOUNT AT 6'-6" A.F.F.) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'BD' (MOUNT AT 12' A.F.F.) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE'SI' (SIGN FLOOD LIGHT) ULEE-30021 1/ TI',GMAN Leeds 6 Large Surface DOWnlight 05 L/GHT/NG USA Ingle IVB111011=1111 Mal T ECHNOLOGv � -,'_- LeVe at+.«.+.. .w...,am wmwaaim � w.rona,....w«ama•�.�. 7:7 J anry Po4��mvmtm�Eps'wmm yR. a. -- Slice Medium (SLM) Outdoor LED Area Light 4 - F '- — (Solera VA O-C7.O =8 LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE'SA' (MOUNT AT CARPORT FASCIA) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'SB'(MOUNT AT CARPORT) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE'SC,'SF,'SFAND'SG' (MOUNT AT 25'A.F.F.) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE'SH' (BOLLARD) A a 8� LIGHT FIXTURE CUTSHEETS 2 3 i 4 5 r L Cm snpla4Mp mmuKrnb THE ALTUM GROUP 72140 MAGNESIA E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 ECT LAJQUINTA VILLAGE D APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT NW WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 D B re. 11.10.2022 21.ALTG.003 A GUFRy VLc�� LIGHT FIXTURE CUTSHEETS SHEF NO E 1.4 617 P.EFED TO P. BLtDNG PLANTM EiWBIT ..� q- OLQG 13 ,I F ri,l'+11�-rw�s .AJTAC-HMEN T 4 .*f _ ADO 9 CLUB LS,rnr. ,.r'S f * ' • � *_ .•, - '� +*fit ff H8J rAff r B1D{i 3 � RAG-63µ4� # lCQ s — , r• dl1b. Fi pA�l - - pleb Gl o P+11i.b 4' I� f' I a4'RIh'•17JA4 „}.nr �, - - aillwr 1�•� 1 ir PICf T T4q�E 4 I . F 3 _ • ti r -Mgt ARV 7R-M, Dj=-ft nG e ! ' -To h 4 x w n o 8Z 7- } + ffAA►`rc1 64R4 i AIM2.* a'aw.Frl.Ml.mews I i 5bc Ni 'JO k �43" x a0: r Tib f = ICts wrox '.� ,i.�alrrl.n �.i. �_• r�+r , IL OIL y - WD x ,Q ZK _ --- ----- - -- - ---- ---- - -- --- -- - —1 _Rung �------- �^ Fi16ril- CP%•,`• ---- --- '---J - — FEFER TO SLOPE PLA#TNO E HffT ACCEITT PAMNa P-CKLEB 4LL OLflT 3FG x AN x n-:+b] ac KTrr SIG Cyr N POOL fiBWEM AFEA +1# eFt tq—lk . I yi tr- Fra'C[ '4y1.6 u06 �iiyGSL7lC'•szi L-##-h'f: �'°�in++YCo �+, :�ci� 32:.i14'!• '•'T 74;z'f1 . - S Lit CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LP-1 PRELMNARY LANDSCAPE PLAN [7 L Q�T VILL E AP RTMEI TS - L7F_#YIhH}Int�.7liti c�l0 ]l,� =r-M VMLr aQ s # m A.'r-r im 1 � rrl+v -siH PARKER DEVELOPMENT C= OF LA QUINTA, CA ,,Nr&o-nT8d3L- p-k*T a r 618 PLANT LIST T T IR <i TRASH I I �L• �� �� 36, RIM 402 LM m- mok du low WN" T"cL 4LTW. pf A&&MA &4CIP" m. Woc d" Lm ftv lw --r Wh9 TIK STW. .4. FIAW HUMA PRABCCti- + al lcw 4145LE Two 4LTPO. LWDTH ,dg3lM;= W IM4 ob rEp + DESERT ACZENTS *Maj- dU IAW I ip km BLDG. 1 e. 2-SP a A&6NE diff"41IUSW th dow- 0 "m -FLlN&-WJ*& A&WE PAD=51.0 Ilk WEaffWALfMf-AftfR-eNU b qow-. du uw FOOTrW% F a 'lPER-WFLo*fENC-V 2FL du Lm 16 UNITS -STORY ` F00TP R I NT 7,500- SF CAELAU-NA ML14HRMN-1 19 C.4- AU Lew 0 ITIVp Wmp or P&R=lmr io � FQ va L{w LtW*X hwtb*;lmis r 4] L-= -ATWEWFCAWA- EE*" ARIENA-CM8 bq4 IM —4— TEOC*tA WAK6 b 4k4 mm 'YELLME-LA 1:1va.LGW J. AAP CALTr It qAIL 213 LW rrrLe MAWLIAE4WBETWORMS 5 &4L- i.s mdo LELCOrRYLLUM ZYWfWJ.L" 5 dLAJ- du ill-W ca, 40 a, tKu �rnnk-v 96 dp4L jpiilq= MULpHeelIB-A C.Q-U-AMS oa" lob Plop -PE&J-L MST' uz 49 P6 (VI O9P MCC] IIP Cl h% b 44. ob mcp 4pj LG;j 90IJ6-2N%,LLE1 FT 5 &4L as mm La 4P-Lb- ti PEPeA b dLA4- &W, dub rqm '09;Y FL94E-W TYP. BUILDING PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA hlnl,F- MY. RW. HlrPA#IT 60CJrD" "" WT M CBRIIINCMD FROM AOCM* OT veV-"NrMA MUMM 9 "!J-t rAcmA Ammdb hJd34 meimck 0411190TWI1124M IFHAJL m Row; of awwwr-Tewi wEffi"AT%M III TW CONAMEM71M iW VWMW M-Wff LANC6C-W-Wc& W C&*dWffrWr UTM M-W GF= IM G4LM;MLLA VALUT 4ATIM pwmwtzpvmwhk;o mmi " 11"ka-01CA ISTOTEW WALL W fNB0*LWD FM EFFEt;EW P9W-0PrWU,M W44 CONIONVATIOW N KM PO Jfi- 11cmilm pw X SLOW-Im Wywrim 11" PARR PI: pplil", WA" t* " *-A — LP-2 Hmuik,,-,i Dom, oouP qr ?X&M, mll:W m Rnp llu PALM CHMZT, CA rm":mmm%.mj mit cc-AWS r.w Lrci! rm, Exp "Im F19 t-.WJ779All1 PAX C)� T.760LU CWM dwLw 4V Hf. BLOCK WALL SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CTI'Y OF LA QUINTA, CA PLANT L I T 6"5CL 42T•r_ 50TANIGAL NWr= 64M R JIIEB 41J•16 10 DALM " Naa(s ts',Nex d:1 LOu •r�1a� I�oweue.�a• r +r+ l as TIW{ do&meo 36•.aoe o3 i.oU ��. * ae�su u-aoo-e Mulu ONW m mis tow. �i AtE iALIC �D�Pii' U. Wac did IAA Y41� lqqw-s 7gm yThp. n+IF�wrera�rlweu�r '"A-0bd�O OFEi• dL7 "K A� ARDWIleRnti noq -s T spo u wG OThO w WPA r,oa p mo mp or jA W Wh4 vs�mw DESERT ACCENTS Awlam . W -a, du L[W ■ AfL►Sv�GR E' b ". 4" lW * b did dc7 J.I • P O8L a9 L{W GAF3A1J�11+#I'11L� MIS i �L i�7 LAU M %m F 08L du L" WChT., IW. 4WtMk* } F 0,U. N L{W SEN" A wrml wdrm Y Oil_ do LAW 782" W*O 0 y+_ *y hw •YELLIM N81IP RffL0ruwaiV~&Lw F dAL OO L"l lVM^m1 ,# M ". F7 14IY L.9.WR-IYLLm LT#CTf� b dIAL id LEW L r?Y"LA6* 5 O6L lSR pvp Qlu M&MOMMIUM d9'LLAi6 b GAJ- at, Flop ! LW" JWUff IA, bGL. W&M= # PAse WW,511 0 OFL, d# rq= ! Yfwi=-6 d . 0 Oil. du LO4 CAPrr= tk qwW. "rip 0 QkiL C9 1{W mu%nEa, i INAL db hldf.' MUMM41M-E# YSY FLGlUW 5 64- ww- d3 pm NOTE F-W. FPP. FFTPWW f L"F"" *MLL NPT M C9M%W l0 MOM ACC50 3Y v59ETArkK A HvN-LH m "dd 7Mnii .aaib bk34 ntr7czt CORPMEFIR T. PFW" i FI CF nownwwRtG WMMATYCIL dTH tdW 5dWM.TIZN Cr M %W RWWT qolwn{ L1rlS1'�F2 C.R.+titlOhl 6td7�M�hlt L.A-MVPM M GCMbWrENr WrrW THE Ii2JIQ'Ti'{fF {F THE LG LA YALLLY 11aTGR P"�� M }mt," 84flr bL4LL � bCotO Pok 1!"daEr PEWMIAME LldTN CAIlENriTkM N MTO. F-MW lCuMig DICE., P.ENF.GR VT7Tai4 WILL FqqgvrDs prwm ok"is"04pmF jkP LP-3 Reammm Do" GUILT 774P4 YAMY 9Q 5u= lm hU.p?Lbm3Gf.c A QnI r LLfy Z75S,m0 am, PJI [4J Tr" -417J PAX CM%MALM 620 ACZVW--PAIM Q -111401MMAAMB ttoffm ".A PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QlJ[NTA, CA Vb 1E= PLANT L ITT . sy1 4- QTY. 5orAKIC L NAM 52zr= wAr��x use TREES t PALMS Fgpms;� 3 T "RT'U 714�' 74' ip� �i YYd: 36, Wm Al 9LEL� T hl7 *[ �T ONFT1l * ACAMA SOLWWA U. 5c*r r07 Lm %q"Qm tK�a' 4?17ii T%K SM PAlFGf lmAfY4�,x U W L* W7-A' ptilq�M iTtlt #hp. AF W A91E]IRl4 C! 10L IMN LE TiK BTha W Wr-H l�k7P 'f+�FIp113 1'r1.7'I' POft �wiiJnlotawl# .4 PA kwPray rs r•�op DESERT ACCEN73 } qF WL da L9L 494L lv] LUW .+mArtla4q.Ct LhPA 94N�L.04E7 AOALE' bqi� 001{=+i 4EBPE%4L[m4-.5bll'L:w 'DBIERT FL A21EHC# bg3L e..+_•u i big a b0AL O] Jl:w CAFIALPTIYb RLL{{//��g�[ C �L �! 1cW TbR w7w mw jj=tWfjr*3ft"164 L la] JAU LtNrW MEnNOMO F d, L Oj LaW EMU APHTWOW� T54 1pq� e] l� } TEMa"t BrANS to qwwm rah Hw 'MLL{DY 00JA 4L*9=69 16424L p] 4{Au LRTL� bQ4 e7 Lau RNL U. BO s--UR7 s b QAL AL Mao L NZW" iYdorwl Ljl bhaL d71CW €+ F M266L 41A rvpp R �Y�A'IFL4* ■&AL OF, MGL7 # KI&EMBERWA [J KI-AM6 b q4 ON Fiop TECWL MST' * I.C[1�D1�4 L4H9F4L'� PR"*1 & &AL 03 MOD * RTC+1�'l��I F 420 MPP cRQuwpcc l=-R 4 ldtaomomLmm o- 'Pauw � 4bL a FiPR WEEN b 41LWiiN R7�•F F� b&6L i..21fM EOLWiL 1 v LL EA b 4AL as Mod La ygyz. -7ti dLR*ffA PEPEM b G Jqm aw a.L mm '0%-f FL 4mE W CASTTUWM RIOM AdCl!"SFr wHIELArWKA f APAI ahttF WALL PH F F}aJ nbw+P C#P AVIML W WALL #G AT'I 9F PI'gA1t=T4i LP-4 'reoerAT�LL u TM oaFeln t�Ar r�V o! MbTIR rv.�r aim{ IWea.11Q"Wf. {F 7M 93aaA;FGLLa VALLEY QATEA — 774H4 WOLF Rn PW FEC, r oMPM UNKU " 4 ft&ftPL �, w �� � 3L7'R 19Q ■TWMt SPALL M IMMM MM 2"14ME r l�LJi �fil4 Rr .E rF TU 4 C61�.ArkM H K+CL F*Nr WHEK Dfi / ■.MLGR WroTa4 LLU.L PvPMPE mil PrOG* 4k" TP yr# Comm Apo ham* L� 27S6 TU P�4 UM �� FAK (3ffl 7M4H-2 621 f, 4J l'J 0 0J -x� c0 1�f_ o w _ ENTRY 6' HT. B�,CC K WALL ala r- -� .--ray VEHRDULAA GATE 6-W W. PLASTER 1WH PRELIMINARY RY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER ED DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUI TA, CA elk h iie Rp W. s I i � •;xr- ,� � I� ,iYc � ��W A&) do TER FEWE NO'R-. 14, xPE, WPGA�T,4X-arm 2-4- NrT AF 0090cic more,+,v18K a- TLCM'.*�R sY�r�f R—L I- irea}c ra�aa *,wL z ... -. F �r �s o-}�a.cmyF Y_BE TA•.+7Fi,W'h C�OGGS�'}J• R CIA J!G ry� iim'a IIJ�-Ec CGN9F! fA-riCN -T=! rVT LA%CKCAR*5 f 1W+Ab1C1T L�T,.',•E pe'MrT Qelxtr.4 LIM-..4F 1-MF.A-M4 &rOM WALL W M5+•1+42-'3 PdR MICVe T PER9i�F,-AiGE •WRG: paar L. F1'�€• 3i PR= L"rPLR 10 T-F 7;+1U.a4 aV -RG=a LP-5 HumANN GYMI1N C7x0.F R C -C ry w Tr4M WDLF RD IUTTE IOC rhFfd M'$h PLfX i U A 27r4, EKL--M- " - x_., a #7LkldM 1t1401 FAX 17M 7TT 4J3-' 622 ELI 44 a 1111F11 dw MIN 11111112 gill fill! 11111112 Nil 101 1111,1111001p Iptiliumi 2 PP P-1 UWE . . . ....... ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . m 2 A rl w...111 -1 F'ji-jj­ i7l. 3� CONCEPTUAL WALL AND FENCE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA Pik jjrc;ml jr L5'4ENQ WaPtl,b PWXX LW" to P*KAW H KAC* Am=*to*ta* LW+I FL LTC-&P TAN VOLM iki-ip'M. PG.MnMuTI4 6ft&3dv"AJe4 07H CGWPRWW 744 Ipp-m rAp .*,b— pm- .WU*H-4. LKNOJABff SON LP-6 Ebmua-N Dmmwc;"Dp wou on I ra rac F.W ftmm &=4.R r.4ff III k-hwilmi v&%pfiffp_mIJ3 ATTACHMENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS WRITTEN COMMENTS AUGUST 1, 2023 COUNCIL MEETING 624 From: Tania Flores To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Cheri Flores Subject: FW: Irwin Partners hearing RE: Washington and Ave 50 (APN 646-070-016 Date: Friday, July 28, 2023 11:00:52 AM Attachments: innaae001.ona Importance: High Good morning Clerks, Please see public comment received regarding La Quinta Village Apartments. Thank you. Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design &Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov From: Ruth Waytz <rwaytz@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 5:24 PM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Irwin Partners hearing RE: Washington and Ave 50 (APN 646-070-016 EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use properjudgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello - My name is Ruth Waytz and I live in Montero Estates, across from the proposed apartments at Washington and Avenue 50. 1 have attended the Planning Commission meetings and voiced my opposition to this terrible project. I'm grateful the planning commission decided not to recommend this project go forward. There are so many problems! I'm not sure which I think is the most serious, so this is a random order. Contrary to what the developer claims, traffic will be dramatically increased at and and near this corner for several reasons. The entry gate can accommodate only three cars, meaning we will frequently see traffic backed up onto the streets. Access will require am a ssive increase in U- turns, which are already incredibly dangerous. The developer said something like 10 additional U-turns per day. 500 residents and only 10 people leaving the house per day? Wrong. And insulting. Mention was made of widening of Avenue 50 as part of the proposed bridge project. I know you know that project could take six years to complete and hasn't even started. The developer is acting as if Avenue 50 already has that extra lane. It doesn't. Architectural style I know they claim they revised the style and now it's "Mediterranean," but it still looks like glorified storage units or a Residence Inn to me. It's a giant eyesore and it doesn't look like anything else anywhere around it. I'm not sure how that piece of land got rezoned, but everything around it is low density. Everything. I know the developer knocked back their request from high density to medium high, but that is still way more than our neighborhood can tolerate. One of the speakers at one of the planning commission meetings treated us to a lovely history of the historic architectural style of La Quinta. This project does not fit in with our style and theme. It's big, cheap, and ugly. Further, the development still has three-story buildings, inadequate parking, and no elevators. This is a hazard for older or disabled residents, as well as anybody who might want to move a piece of furniture into their apartment. In the last planning commission meeting, the developer flat out admitted the elevators would have been too expensive. What other safety corners are they cutting? Low income/affordable housing Much has been said about this, and the City's mandate to add affordable housing — but this isn't that! This complex will not have low income housing. Its lower priced units are roughly 600 ft.' and about $2000 a month. I don't know where that counts as affordable housing, but those 625 prices are not low and I don't think you could get a roommate in a 600 square -foot apartment. Irwin Partners This developer is already notorious for breaking/ignoring laws. This is a very slippery slope. Dealing with someone whose response to being made aware of the law and still deliberately breaking it is, "so sue me" is less than ideal. Power station Yes, we could use a new Power Station, and this complex absolutely cannot exist on the current grid. But this expansion is no gift, and I'm not willing to let the developer ruin our neighborhood with promises that benefit IID and the city like someone jangling car keys to distract a baby. NIMBY I'm aware of the objections to our objections, stating something is going to be developed on that corner, no matter what, and that anyone opposed is a "Karen" or a crybaby. I'm certain that corner will be developed, but we have an obligation to the city of La Quinta and its residents to maintain our quality of life and aesthetics. This is just the wrong project for this corner. I know you're going to get lots more letters that go into more detail. I never seem to be able to think of everything when I sit down to write, but I want my opinion recorded and counted. I will be attending the meeting on August 1. Thank you for your time and consideration, Ruth (Turns out this phone isn't full of candy after all.) 626 Tania Flores From: Diane Bryant <di.marie.bryant@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 6:59 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: La Quinta Village Apartments You don't often get email from di.marie.bryant@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. I live in the Citrus Country Club. I am so sad to see these new housing projects building up to three stories, soon they'll want four. I'm not in favor of high density living in a desert community with limited water. You need at least 2 parking spaces for each apartment. In your larger apartments there may be one or more adult children with parking needs. They will be parking on the streets, which is never a good idea. The moderate income families need an on property park setting for their children to play in safely. It should have playground equipment. La Quinta Village Apartments is an enormous improvement over the original name. I wish market rate and moderate income were 50-50, but I do understand the need to make money. Sincerely, Diane Bryant 1 627 From: Joe Hager <joehager119@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 6:54 PM To: Cheri Flores Cc: Tania Flores; Danny Castro Subject: Re: La Quinta Village Apts Public Hearing Information EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Well, if I cannot speak via the Zoom meeting as was stated in your meeting agenda, then here are my questions that I would request you or someone read/ask at the meeting: 1. What is the maximum allowable residents/unit?.... or isn't this going to be controlled and monitored? • if 1 bedroom units allowed 1 resident = 166 • if 2 bedroom units allowed 2 residents = 172 o total = 338 • But, these numbers could easily double to a total of 676 if not mandated or monitored • So, then is a zoning change really not longer required? 2. Where and when were the neighborhood meetings held to inform the adjunct neighborhoods of this proposed development? • I live in Duna LaQuinta, directly across the Washington/50 intersection and our neighborhood was not invited to attend any informative meeting. • Previously I was told there was a meeting completed at PGA West, which is not affected by this development! • Seems like the developer is trying to slip this proposal past the adjunct neighborhoods. I do not believe the results stated from the traffic studies and would request a independent study be completed, not by the city traffic engineer. Thanks for conveying my questions and concerns, Joe Hager Duna LaQuinta 952-270-0268 On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 8:27 PM Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Hello Mr. Hager, My apologies but we do not do Zoom meetings anymore. This meeting is in person and is still going on if you are able to come to City Hall. You may also watch the meeting on our website at the following link: La Quinta, CA: Live Video (12milesout.com) 628 Cheri Flores I Planning Manager City of La Quinta (L&a 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph.760-777-7067 �.11CltiIkiNi.l! www.laguintaca.gov = From: Joe Hager <ioehager119@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 6:25 PM To: Cheri Flores <clflores@lag uintaca.gov> Cc: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Re: La Quinta Village Apts Public Hearing Information EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. The Zoom meeting link for this planning commission meeting has not been started yet, so I cannot call in or raise my hand to speak. Can you get this Zoom meeting started? Thanks, Joe Hager On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:18 AM Cheri Flores <clflores@lag uintaca.gov> wrote: Hello Mr. Hager, The traffic study was redone and results will be published in the staff report. The City has not been informed of the construction start and end dates. The City is aware of 3 neighborhood meetings that the applicant has held. The last one was held earlier this week. 629 Please be sure you are signed up for the Quail Mail notification system so that you can be notified when the staff report comes out. It will be published by tomorrow. Have a nice day. Cheri Flores I Planning Manager City of La Quinta 0 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 6 Ph.760-777-7067 www.laquintaca.gov CALIFORNIA From: Joe Hager <ioehager119@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 6:42 AM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Re: La Quinta Village Apts Public Hearing Information EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hi Tania Thanks for sending me the information on the upcoming meeting and the proposed development plans. I have a couple more questions: • Was a new traffic study completed and if so, where are the results? • What are the proposed start and completion dates? • One of the previous comments and objections was that adjacent neighborhoods were not surveyed or informed of the proposed development. I believe there was a previous meeting held at PGA West, which really isn't affected by this development, so how about the adjacent neighborhoods, country clubs and schools: Duna La Quinta, LaQuinta Country Club, Rancho LaQuinta Country Club, LaQuinta Resort and the nearby school, will there be meetings for these residents? Thanks, Joe Hager 630 On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:28 PM Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Good morning, I received your voice message requesting information regarding the upcoming public hearing for La Quinta Village Apartments (formerly Troutdale Residences). The City has created a project page for easy access to the most current documents, including revised documents, here: https://www.laguintaca.gov/our-city/city-departments/design-and-development/planninq- division/planning-projects/la-guinta-village-apartments-troutdale The public hearing for this project was continued to June 27, 2023, and will begin at 5:00 p.m. This meeting is in -person only but will be live streamed on our City's webpage at http://Iaguinta.12milesout.com/video/live. Written Public Comment may be submitted by email, mail, or hand delivery to City Hall in the following manner: Email to tflores(@Iaquintaca.gov, the email subject line must state "Written Comments" along with the project name and the body of the email should include: 1) full name, 2) city of residence, and 3) your comments. Mail or hand delivery should clearly state that the document "Written Comment" along with the project name and should include: 1) full name, 2) city of residence, and 3) your comments. Public Comment received 24 hours prior to the posting of the agenda will be included in the agenda packet. Public Comment received after the posting of the agenda but by noon the day of the meeting will be sent to the Planning Commission for review prior to the meeting. All Public Comment, including comment received after noon the day of the meeting but prior to the end of the meeting, will be included in the final agenda packet record of the meeting. Additional information regarding public comment will be posted in the agenda packet. The agenda packet for this meeting will be published at least 72 hours prior to the meeting on the City's website Calendar page event for this meeting: https://www.laguintaca.gov/about- us/calendar. You can sign up for automatic e-notifications (QuailMail) through the City's website, where you can select the option for Planning Commission, and you will get an e-notification once the meeting has been published to the website. You can also select other categories for other types of e- notifications from the same place at: https://www.laguintaca.gov/connect/e-notifications/quail-mail. Thank you and have a wonderful day. t QI w CALIFORNIA Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 631 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFloresC@_LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov 632 From: Thomas Kenny <tklook585@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 1:42 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: La Quinta Village (formerly Troutdale Village) Site Plan [You don't often get email from tklook585@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Ms Flores As a resident of La Quinta I am concerned with plans to build an apartment community with multiple buildings taller than 2 stories. While I am supportive of building affordable housing options for residents this project looks like it has some work to do to blend in with the scheme of the community. Perhaps the developer can reduce the height of the buildings to provide a mix of 2 and 3 stories. I am also concerned about density at that intersection which already supports heavy traffic during school hours. Please take input from the community before granting final approval. Thanks 633 From: Cheri Flores Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 12:50 PM To: Tania Flores Cc: Bryan McKinney; Danny Castro Subject: FW: See comment letter below. Cheri Flores I Planning Manager City of La Quinta I 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 ,Ca Qa, tta/ Ph.760-777-7067 .11 ilt�i���i�www.laquintaca.gov =t ! From: Brian Thomas <myhudsonhouse@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 12:41 PM To: Cheri Flores <clfIores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: You don't often get email from myhudsonhouse@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hi Cheri, I attended the last two Developer and recent City Council meetings and after reviewing the majority of the newly posted documents, wanted to report the following concerns. The Updated Traffic Study - The 'Updated Traffic Study' wasn't posted on the City's Website last week when I checked. didn't check on Monday but noted that it was present this morning. I honestly don't know 'why'this document wasn't posted at least 1-2 weeks ago given the fact that so many issues came up regarding its content. I mentioned to the Council members at the last meeting that the December/2021 assessment was missing, 1) information regarding 'when' the study was conducted, it's relevance in 2023, the duration, date/time, etc. plus a host of other items that weren't clearly stated. The new document states, "Turning movement counts for one weekday during the morning and evening peak hours and average daily traffic (ADT) counts were conducted on Thursday March 30, 2023". My questions are: -Assessing turning counts for 1 day does begin to identify traffic patterns over the entire month. -Why wasn't this document available to the public 1-2 weeks prior to tonight's meeting when they have had 90 days to complete and post it? -Why wasn't the study completed during the Coachella concerts in April to better track volume and load? -Why can't the individuals who executed this study clearly state the 1) Duration, (i.e. start date/time, etc.), method of analysis, (i.e. people counting cars on each corner or a counting cable across the ground?) 634 Summary - I earnestly can't believe that the individuals calling themselves 'experts' want us to believe that this is again, a valid study. Yes, it can be said that it was done during 'peak season' as will undoubtedly be stated tonight, but it is still missing information. The North Wall - During last week's Developers meeting, questions came up about the north wall behind the residences on Saguaro Street and the proposed garages. One of the Saguaro residents stood up and said, "I have a 6 foot wall behind my house - how will the proposed garages affect my view"? The two individuals representing the Developer stated, "The garages will be 10 feet high which means that you will lose 4 feet of your view" and reiterated, "It's only 4 feet", minimizing the residents' concern. This isn't the first concern that has been brought up about how the build will affect community residents, some of whom have lived there for over 10 years. On behalf of these concerned residents, I'd like to say the following ... -The Developer has proposed 520 Parking Places and assigned 58 of them to the 12 garages, (i.e. 5 parking slots per garage), leaving 462 Parking Place with no overhead cover. -Why does the developer want the 12 garages, Why here when they will undoubtedly block the mountain view for most, if not all of the Saguaro residents -Are the garages being proposed to provide additional revenue for those who can pay for the space versus those that can't? -Why not put them on the East and/or South sides where they won't block any residences? Summary - I have talked with some of these residents about the proposed garages and believe that due diligence hasn't been done. I want to ask the council members to consider pushing out any approvals until such time that the Saguaro residents have been informed with how the proposed garages will impact their view. If the majority say they don't care, then build the garages, but if the majority have a deep concern about this, then the Developer has two options, 1) Eliminate them altogether from the plan or 2) Move them to the East and South sides of the property. Either way, I believe that we need to reach out to the Saguaro residents to let them know what the plan is. Regards Brian Thomas 635 From: Cher Nelson <chernelson94@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 5:29 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: Housing Project at 50th and Washington [You don't often get email from chernelson94@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear Mr. Flores, We have been residents of La Quinta since 2011. Our reasons for choosing this Gem of the Desert was because of its quaintness, its beauty, and, of course, the stunning views. The businesses are incredibly friendly and very convenient to visit. And, our beautiful community, La Quinta Fairways, is the most delightful place to live. And now, it is being threatened by the idea of an apartment complex consisting of two and three story buildings that will not only increase traffic but will obstruct our beautiful view of our mountains. And let's not forget the community on Sagebrush which is right next to this project. Many of these people who live on Sagebrush will be losing all privacy in their backyards. To ask the people of La Quinta to believe that this project will not affect the traffic is ridiculous. Especially since the traffic study was performed in the off-season during Co-Vid. The traffic is going to be greatly impacted and a street that is already precarious will become dangerous to pedestrians and motorists alike. You only have to view the monstrosity being erected in Indio at the corner of Jefferson and Highway 111 to understand why most of the LaQuinta residents are against this project. My husband and I urge you to persuade the Planning Commission and City Council to not approve this project. Thank you, Cheryl and Robert Nelson 50-800 Grand Traverse La Quinta, CA 636 From: Carolyn Randall <ceceole@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 4:37 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: Project at 50th Ave and Washington You don't often get email from ceceole@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Mr. Flores, I am writing to you as an ordinary citizen and resident of La Quinta. I live in La Quinta Fairways. My concerns are, in my opinion, very valid. La Quinta is a very charming village in the desert. We have a beautiful and quaint looking downtown that is welcoming and pleasant. We have no three story buildings that I am aware of. I believe that a three story structure in this residential location would be detrimental to our charm. I am sure you have seen the project at Jefferson and Hiway 111 (which is Indio) it is complete eyesore. The traffic problem that this project would bring to this area would be a nightmare. Already there is a tremendous amount of congestion at Moonriver/Park and 50th Ave. when the schools are in session. My concerns are for the children that have to cross this intersection to get to and from school. Even tho this intersection is signalized, as locals, we know to count to 10 before starting out on a green light. There is definitely a recipe for disaster here.The impact on the traffic at Washington and 50th will also be greatly increased and so will the probability of accidents. The impact of this project on the residents of the Sagebrush area is going to be enormous. They will loose their privacy and not to mention their view of our beautiful mountains. The noise level and light levels will also be greatly increased. I am sure when the residents in this area purchased their homes they were satisfied that no development like this proposed would happen because this space is zoned for residential. I implore you to consider the adverse effects this proposed project will have on our beautiful little village. Regards, Carolyn Randall 78991 Breckenridge Drive La Quinta 637 From: Monika Radeva Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 2:34 PM To: David Sedgwick; City Clerk Mail Cc: Tania Flores; Cheri Flores Subject: Sedgwick, Mary Lynn & David: La Quinta Village Project at 50th and Washington Good afternoon, the written comments provided below regarding this project have been received, and will be distributed to the City Council and added to the project file. Thank you. Monika Radeva, CMC I City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva(a-)_laguintaca.gov From: David Sedgwick <daveandmarylynn@verizon.net> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 11:25 AM To: City Clerk Mail <CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov> Subject: La Quinta Village Progect at 50th and Washington Some people who received this message don't often get email from daveandmarylynn@verizon.net. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Please advise the City Council that my husband and I highly object to the proposed apartment complex being considered for the corner of 50th and Washington. We reside in Montero Estates, right across Washington, on the NW corner of those two streets. Sincerely, Mary Lynn and David Sedgwick 638 From: Celeste Varela <manniesmama@aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2023 8:43 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: "WRITTEN COMMENTS"Celeste Varela la Quinta Troutdale Apartmemts [You don't often get email from manniesmama@aol.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** 2nd email. So now that we are in the heat of the summer my next MAJOR concern is the electricity issue. How can IID sustain an additional 240+ units using the air conditioners in the summer. It will be impossible. This project is not sustainable in the summer months and or any other time. I was at the meeting and I am Not clear if this project was approved or what is going g on with it? Please help me to know where we stand with it at this time. Thank you, Celeste Varela 49860 Avila Dr La Quinta Manniesmama@aol.com Sent from my iPhone 639 TO: LaQuinta City Council Members RE: Proposed Project: NE Corner of Washington & Avenue 50 We urge the City Council NOT to approve this project for the following reasons: • At 252 units, some 3-story (and without elevators), this proposed development is too dense for the surrounding neighborhoods. (Without the so-called "Density Bonus", code for developing this property is limited to 177 units.) o With 522 parking spaces, traffic on Avenue 50 is sure to increase significantly, resulting in less safety and increased noise and light pollution, thus impairing quality of life and, in some cases, interrupting view corridors of existing residents. v The proposed height of the three-story units is 28 feet, six feet or 27% above the 22- foot code. 4 There are questions about the whether the proposed development compromises the safety of children who attend the nearby Middle School and Boys & Girls Club, located at Moon River Drive. Many of these children walk, roller blade or ride their bikes to/from school. The safety situation is exacerbated by the U-turns at Eastbound Avenue 50 and the Park/Moon River intersection that will be required to access the proposed property. • The property is owned by a company in Oregon; the developer is in Costa Mesa, both with little vested interest in preserving the quality of life that we have come to enjoy as LaQuinta residents. We agree that development this vacant property is inevitable and can be a positive for the City. BUT it can and should be developed in a manner that maintains the charm, style and serves to preserve the peace and view corridors of LaQuinta, as other developments in or near Old Town have achieved to good effect. Mary Montgomery 49300 Avenida Fernando La Quinta, CA 92253 James M. Montgomery 49300 Avenida Fernando La Quinta, CA 92253 Evelyn Sproul 78046 Calle Norte La Quinta, Ca 92253 Monica Bolemyer 78016 Calle Norte La Quinta, Ca 92253 IVA/ 70�Q 'L zU 21 s- j 640 July 7, 2023 TO: LaQuinta City Council Members RE: Proposed Project: NE Corner of Washington & Avenue 50 We urge the City Council NOT to approve this project for the following reasons: v At 252 units, some 3-story (and without elevators), this proposed development is too dense for the surrounding neighborhoods. (Without the so-called "Density Bonus', code for developing this property is limited to 177 units.) v With 522 parking spaces, traffic on Avenue 50 is sure to increase significantly, resulting in less safety and increased noise and light pollution, thus impairing quality of life and, in some cases, interrupting view corridors of existing residents. • The proposed height of the three-story units is 28 feet, six feet or 27% above the 22- foot code. • There are questions about whether the proposed development compromises the safety of children who attend the nearby Middle School and Boys & Girls Club, located at Moon River Drive. Many of these children walk, roller blade or ride their bikes to/from school. The safety situation is exacerbated by the U-turns at Eastbound Avenue 50 and the Park/Moon River intersection that will be required to access the proposed property. ■ The property is owned by a company in Oregon; the developer is in Costa Mesa, both with little vested interest in preserving the quality of life that we have come to enjoy as LaQuinta residents. We agree that development this vacant property is inevitable and can be a positive for the City. BUT it can and should be developed in a manner that ensures safety, consistency with La Quinta's charm and style, and serves to preserve the peace and view corridors of LaQuinta -- as other developments in or near Old Town have achieved to good effect. Bruce & Daisy Albertson 48-751 San Vincente Cindy Anderson 488-955 El Nido Jim Armatus 49-165 Avenida El Nido Rebecca Backes 78-230 San Timoteo Al & Diana Backman 49-125 Avenida Fernando 641 Phil Backman & Sharon Sledhil 49285 Avenida El Nido James Baldwin & Kathy Moran 78823 Breckenridge Drive Beth & George Barnes 48-711 San Vincente Brad Barrett 48-750 San Lucas Ron & Lynn Beeler 78262 Calle Las Ramblas Susan & Larry Bianchi 79-780 Tangelo Street Elizabeth & Frank Billante 49-815 Rancho San Felipe Shawn & Laura Bitzan 48-135 Hermosa Jeff & Vicky Botsford 49-380 Avenida Fernando Kay & Bob Brehm 80-073 Riviera Ken & Kay Broadie 49-035 Cedros Circle Ted & Liz Broedlow 48-771 San Vincente Nancy Buford 49-931 Coachella Drive Sila van den Bussche 50440 Cypress Point Drive Linda & Dave Campbell 78-269 Hacienda La Quinta Drive 642 John Carnes & Shannon Devlin 49-732 Avila Drive Marilu & Allan Carroll 79-120 Big Horn Trail Deborah Carter & Jessica Ruh 49-434 Avila Drive Marge & Gary Chamberlain 49-506 Avila Drive Richard & Raelene Christie 78-125 Lago Drive Bill & Diane Cornell 50745 Cypress Point Drive Judie & Richard Cothrun 49-335 Avenida Fernando John & Carol Cowden 49-790 Coachella Drive Tom & Janet Curtis 77-935 Lago Drive Debbie Dale 78-007 Lago Drive Dina & Mike Dargis 78-179 Hacienda LaQuinta Charlotte Davis 78186 Calle Norte James & Diane Deckert 49-789 Coachella Drive Romeo & Erika Dela Rosa 48-905 Avenida Fernando Jerry & Joanne Dickey 77-941 Lago Drive 643 Jerry Donahue 49-488 Avila Drive Suzanne & Joe Donnelly 49-644 Avila Drive Laurie & Dan Donohue 49-847 Coachella Drive Jo Downey & Harry Wilson 78-020 Coronados Circle Sue Driscoll 78911 Breckenridge Drive Maureen Dugan 48-770 Via Linda Sandy Dyer 48-800 San Isidro Street Terry & Kevin Eastley 50640 Spyglass Hill Drive Steve Eckinger & Marsha Soday 49-650 Eisenhower Patti & Jim Eddy 49-350 Avenida Anselmo Mary & Mark Engler 57615 Coral Mountain Court Tina Everson 49-680 Coachella Dan & Tammy Fairchild 78-285 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Mark & Lynda Farnen 78835 Grand Traverse Corey & Heidi Farr 49-750 Entrada Circle 644 Deborah Fenn 49-783 Candaleria Julia Fisher 49-825 Lago Drive Eric & Holly Fiskum 45-385 Guijarro Drive Rob & Sera Lynn Florek 48-700 Santa Ursula Street Dr. Wilbert & Glenna Friesen 50720 Cypress Point Drive Jeannie & John Fuller 47-675 Via Montessa Mike & Tracie Furlong 27332 Via Amistoso Marcia Gallagher 77-985 Lago Roger & Jacqueline Garvin 50685 Grand Traverse Avenue Rhonda Gerke 77370 Calle Quintana Jamie Gluck & John Wentworth 77240 Arteaga Renata & Jay Green 77-285 Loma Vista Marta & Rob Griffin 78-270 Hacieda La Quinta Drive Sue & John Hagestad 49-128 Avenida Fernando Fred & Carol Hanley 78-065 Coronados Circle 645 Kathy Hatfield 47-610 Eisenhower Drive Garry Harris & Marcia Wolfe 78875 Grand Traverse Avenue Steve & Erin Hernandez 49575 Avenida Montero Greg & Jennifer Hicks 78540 Bottlebrush Drive Carl & Sheila Highgenboten 78-180 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Todd Hopkins & Gina Calhoun 49537 Avenida Montero Pat Hogan & Ross Johnson 78-017 Lago Drive Greg & Glenna Helm 48-700 San Dimas Street Bob & Ann Hogeboom 78-225 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Skeeter & Suzie Holt 49-729 Avila Drive Moe & Phil Hosp 78-048 San Timoteo Charlie & Kathy Hough 78688 Cabrillo Way Joan Jeffrey 49-749 Entrada Circle Julianne Keil 78-086 Lago Drive Emma Kite 49-614 Avila Drive NE, FT Jay & Sharon Kleinheinz 78-750 Eisenhower Drive Harry & Bonnie Kloosterman 48-454 Via Palomino John Kramer & Jon McBride 48-900 El Nido Drive Bill & Pam Lane 48-720 Avenida Fernando Rob Lang & Alisa Martin 49-100 Avenida Anselmo Mark & Patricia Langermann 78-995 Del Monte Court Angela Lafferty 50380 Spyglass Hill Steve & Susie Lewis 49-416 Avila Drive Kathy Lester 78-084 San Timoteo Pete Lexus Spyglass Hill Maureen Liebman 48-741 San Vincente Street Joe and Angela Lis 78-182 Calle Las Ramblas Karen & Lou Lister 49-845 Lago Drive Paul & Susie Lyon 49-517 Guijarro Drive Virgil & Patty Macaluso 78-108 Lago Drive 647 Keith & Gail MacLeod 49-829 Adelito Circle Tom & Meg Maloney 77-305 Loma Vista Drive Bert & Louise McCabe 49-600 Avenida Montero Mac & Missy McGee 49-830 Coachella Drive Diane McGonigle 48-800 Santa Ursula Drive Jan & Dave McLintock 49-756 Avila Drive Duncan & Becky McInnis 78-068 San Timoteo Bill & Pat McKamey 50300 Spyglass Hill Drive Kevin & Liz Mechelke 49-786 Coachella Drive Grace & Neal Mehta 53480 Avenida Mendoza Karen & Dave Matheson 78182 Calle Norte Mike & Patti Mergerner 48-685 Via Sierra David & Mirella Mesrobian 787 Castle Pines Drive Robert Millar & Mario Guriso 78-165 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Beau & Nancy Miller 78-002 San Timoteo 648 Eileen Mohler 78-153 San Timoteo Renee Monroe Spyglass Hill Mary & Jim Montgomery 49-300 Avenida Fernando Roper & Kelly Morris 49-800 Coachella Drive Jim & Denise Murphy 77-947 Lago Drive Jennifer Murray 78-015 Coronados Circle Judee Myers 50255 Doral Street Joe & Stacy Nemeth 78-144 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Richard & Sharon Nevins 78-635 Mandarina Jim & Diane Nichols 49-841 Coachella Drive Carol Lynn Noack 77-990 Lago Drive Bob Noack 49-251 Avenida Fernando Malott & Nancy Nyhart 78-013 Lago Drive Dan & Beverly O'Connor 77-490 Loma Vista Matt & Trish O'Connor 49-505 Coachella Drive 649 John & Kathy O'Keefe 78-211 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Morgan & Larry Pfeiffer 49-725 Anacapa Circle Joe Perricone 49-415 Avenida Montero Zsuzsanna & Michael Pheil 48-721 San Isidro Cathleen & Shawn Pierce 49-835 Lago Drive Cheryl & Don Pope 49-705 Coachella Drive Peggy & Tom Pyle 78-126 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Carolyn & Richard Randall 78991 Breckenridge Drive Joel Raven 49-814 Coachella Drive Audrey Reed 50235 Doral Street Steve & Jan Reenders 78-268 Calle Las Rmblas Gus Rendon & Anita Agzarian 50815 Nispero Sandy Robbins 78-570 Bottle Brush Leni Roberts 78-120 San Timoteo Mark & Anita Roberts 78-120 San Timoteo 650 Jim & Betty Robinson 49-700 Coachella Drive George & June Romine 49-398 Avila Drive Marian & Bob Rosenwasser 48-608 Paseo Terazo Mitch Rouse 49-455 Coachella Drive Kay Ruttman 48-761 Coachella Drive Toni Salhus 78-080 Calle Norte Cynthia Pistilli Savage & Paul Fournier 49-885 Lago Drive Joe Scaccia 50855 Grand Traverse Robert & Kelly Scannell 49-495 Avenida Montero Kathy & Bob Schowe 49-407 Guijarro Drive Mary & Morgan Shay 49-823 Adelito Drive Nancy Shuma 78-269 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Sarah & Don Siegmund 49-705 Anacapa Circle Gary & Melanie Singer 78-435 Coyote Canyon Court Bill & Carol Slifer 78-023 San Timoteo V 651 Tom & Mary Michael Sterchi 78-096 Coronados George & Jean Stephenson 48-751 San Dimas Street John & Angie Stout 49-685 Anacapa Drive Michael & Betty Terry 78-083 San Ti m oteo Kelly Trembley 78453 Calle Huerta Dr. Danielle Ulian 78-230 Lago Drive Celeste Varela 49960 Avila Drive OD & Jana Vincent 78745 Avenida La Jarita Carter & Meg Wagner 78-067 San Timoteo Ken & Tracy Wallis 47-800 Eisenhower Drive Linda Weil 49-695 Coachella Susan & Jim Weir 49-578 Avila Drive Helen & Dick Welsh 50505 Grand Traverse Avenue Charles & Penny Wentworth 77-144 Lago Drive Donna Westgate 78800 Castle Pines Drive 652 Kevin & Kimberly White 78815 Grand Traverse Joni & Dave Wilson 77-975 Lago Drive Nancy Winton 49980 Calle Estrada Marian Wood 78-133 Lago Drive Lacey & Ashlyn Wooden 52795 Avenida Navarro Steve & Alice Wright 77965 Grey Wolf Trail Josie & Griffin Yoon 78-083 Calle Norte Carl & Ali Zinn 49-200 Avenida Fernando NOTE: All of the individuals shown above provided their specific request to be added to the petition because they object to the project. These requests were via email, and those emails are available for inspection. In addition, here are some notable quotes, made with attribution: "This project is not acceptable due to the safety for children and congestion at a very busy intersection with high speed traffic!!!!" - John O'Keefe "You absolutely have my permission to add my name to this petition. I am totally against this project as projected . We are already overpopulated! The city needs to do the right thing for their voters and population and turn down this ridiculous proposal." — Leni Roberts "Please add our name. I already sent a letter to the LQ council in opposition but that shouldn't affect its standing. I watched the planning commission hearing last week and I'm pleased that the chairwoman and a majority voted it down. I would think the LQ city council wouldn't vote against a project opposed by their chair but one never knows what special interests lurk behind the curtain." - Malott Nyhart "The planned structure sounds horrific especially as it is higher than the 22 foot code." - Jennifer Murray 653 "Thanks for the work you are doing to curtail a totally inappropriate development. Don't know if you get up near Jefferson and 111, but the development that has sprung out of the ground this past year is unsightly and incredibly dense. It isn't in the middle of town like the one at 50th would be, but still is an abomination!" — Kay Brehm "Please add us to the petition opposing the high density housing complex proposed by out of state developers for the 50th Avenue/Washington intersection in LaQuinta. The increased danger to school children who cross that intersection on a daily basis for school and the Boys & Girls Club is of great concern to us. The density of the project for an already very busy, heavily traveled area is far too much." - Mary Michael Sterchi "You can add my name for sure! This high density development would be a disaster for the community and belongs somewhere else!" - Tom Maloney "We are totally against this project. It would be a nightmare on several levels." - Bert McCabe "We do not think it is an appropriate development in the highly contested area." — Bill McKamey "Absolutely agree and please add our names. Sera -Lynn and I in support of the opposition to this project. We are very adverse to the potential for this and glad to see other friends and neighbors are as well." — Rob Florek "We agree with your petition and ask you to add both our names. We are especially concerned about the height, number of units, and access to 50th Avenue. We don't know of any other structures nearby that are as high as the planned new development. The need for U-turns is particularly dangerous at the intersection of Moon River and 50th where so many children are present." — Patricia Hogan "Count us in! Thank you for taking the time to put together that very cogent letter. I had no idea this would become a real threat. It seems so obvious to be a terrible location, and there are so many lots more suitable." - Suzie Lewis "Thank you so much to you and all of the others pushing back on a project that probably has way too much density compared to the surrounding neighborhoods. Hopefully the zoning they currently have is not compatible with the huge development. They are proposing which would give the city the opportunity to tell them they need to design their project within the zoning jurisdiction. Good Luck trying to get them to lower the density o their project which is completely surrounded by very nice single-family homes." - John Kramer " Please add Julie and I on your list. The project is out of character to our area in La Quinta and is way too high density." - Perry Johnson 654 "Yes, you have my permission to add my name to the petition. It sounds like a terrible plan. Not soundly put together." - Tina Everson "Please add our names. I have been reading about it on the La Quinta news I get each day. We certainly don't want it. I did read where they came back and changed several things that were asked to be changed during the last city council meeting. However, I think we want an apartment complex at all at that corner..." - Marsha Soday "I have been active against this particular development. We also believe the level of traffic, the congestion and safety next to the school and the boys and girls club is just unacceptable." - Joe Nemeth "We also believe the level of traffic, the congestion and safety next to the school and the boys and girls club is just unacceptable." - Stacy Nemeth "We drove by the empty lot yesterday. It's huge! Certainly somebody can develop it into something attractive and appropriate for our community. — Beth Barnes "You have my permission to read my name as being AGAINST approval by the City Council at its upcoming meeting regarding the proposed project at Washington and 50th Streets in La Quinta. I am particularly distressed that it is being proposed by an out-of-state company that has no interest in the community whatsoever, other than its own financial benefit. While I understand the general appeal of developing the property so that it no longer remains a vacant lot, including something that would increase the tax base of the City, there has to be a better approach which is in greater keeping with and benefit to the surrounding area, and which has a lesser impact on an already exceedingly busy intersection plagued by high speed traffic, often too heavy for the community at times." - Joel Raven "You absolutely have my permission to add my name to this petition. I am totally against this project as projected . We are already overpopulated! The city needs to do the right thing for their voters and population and turn down this ridiculous proposal. — Leni Roberts "The density of the project for an already very busy intersection, and the additional dangers the school children will face traveling to and from their schools and the Boys & Girls Club are the primary concerns for us. —Tom Sterchi 655 TO: LaQuinta City Council Members RE: Proposed Project: NE Corner of Washington & Avenue 50 We urge the City Council NOT to approve this project for the following reasons: • At 252 units, some 3-story (and without elevators), this proposed development is too dense for the surrounding neighborhoods. (Without the so-called "Density Bonus", code for developing this property is 177 units.) • With 522 parking spaces, traffic on Avenue 50 is sure to increase significantly, resulting in less safety and increased noise and light pollution, thus impairing the quality of life and, in some cases, interrupting view corridors of existing residents. • The proposed height of the three-story units is 28 feet, six feet or 27% above the 22-foot code. • There are serious questions about the safety of children who attend the nearby Middle School and Boys & Girls Club, located at Moon River Drive. Many of these children walk, roller blade or ride their bikes to/from school. The safety situation is exacerbated by the U-turns at Eastbound Avenue 50 and the Park/Moon River intersection that will be required to access the proposed property. ■ The property is owned by a company in Oregon; the developer in Costa Mesa with little vested interest in preserving the quality of life that we have come to enjoy as LaQuinta residents. We agree that development this vacant property is inevitable and can be a positive for the City. BUT it can and should be develop in a manner that maintains the charm, style and serves to preserve the peace and view c of La ' ta, as er developments in or near Old Town have achieved to good effect. Name Name �_— Signatu a Signatur T-M V L 66E�= 1 G C F5 cat% Pripled Name Pnn ed Name Address ru CJ a Address Name Signature Printed Name Addre Name Printed Name Address 7 (96 D 5()GoeRA::� 1OV, �_ 0 Qg�7_4 x- Name 1�_,t2-2_?5-3 Si Pr' ed Nam r� Address f _I� a41 Name Address Name Address Name Address Printed Name -14 IQ f LA— a 2'4 • ^. TO: LaQuinta City Council Members RE: Proposed Project: NE Corner of Washington & Avenue 50 We urge the City Council NOT to approve this project for the following reasons: • At 252 units, some 3-story (and without elevators), this proposed development is too dense for the surrounding neighborhoods. (Without the so-called "Density Bonus", code for developing this property is 177 units.) • With 522 parking spaces, traffic on Avenue 50 is sure to increase significantly, resulting in less safety and increased noise and light pollution, thus impairing the quality of life and, in some cases, interrupting view corridors of existing residents. • The proposed height of the three-story units is 28 feet, six feet or 27% above the 22-foot code. • There are serious questions about the safety of children who attend the nearby Middle School and Boys & Girls Club, located at Moon River Drive. Many of these children walk, roller blade or ride their bikes to/from school. The safety situation is exacerbated by the U-turns at Eastbound Avenue 50 and the Park/Moon River intersection that will be required to access the proposed property. • The property is owned by a company in Oregon; the developer in Costa Mesa with little vested interest in preserving the quality of life that we have come to enjoy as LaQuinta residents. We agree that development this vacant property is inevitable and can be a positive for the City. BUT it can and should be developed in a manner that maintains the charm, style and serves to preserve the peace and view corridors of LaQuinta, as other developments in or near Old Town haveachievedto good effect. Name Name .. He _ Signature Si nature A VJqrk ,�- Qpf Printed Name Printed Name ` Address `T Address Name AM v& Sign u t e rant a m e Address Name �►�j,�Yt Np SXK47VAn- Printed Name Address t4 o LPL Rut mi Name Signature Printed Name Address TX52D 657 TO: LaQuinta City Council Members RE: Proposed Project: NE Corner of Washington & Avenue 50 We urge the City Council NOT to approve this project for the following reasons: At 252 units, some 3-story (and without elevators), this proposed development is too dense for the surrounding neighborhoods. (Without the so-called "Density Bonus", code for developing this property is 177 units.) • With 522 parking spaces, traffic on Avenue 50 is sure to increase significantly, resulting in less safety and increased noise and light pollution, thus impairing the quality of life and, in some cases, interrupting view corridors of existing residents. • The proposed height of the three-story units is 28 feet, six feet or 27% above the 22-foot code. • There are serious questions about the safety of children who attend the nearby Middle School and Boys & Girls Club, located at Moon River Drive. Many of these children walk, roller blade or ride their bikes to/from school. The safety situation is exacerbated by the U-turns at Eastbound Avenue 50 and the Park/Moon River intersection that will be required to access the proposed property. The property is owned by a company in Oregon; the developer in Costa Mesa with little vested interest in preserving the quality of life that we have come to enjoy as LaQuinta residents. We agree that development this vacant property is inevitable and can be a positive for the City. BUT it can and should be developed in a manner that maintains the charm, style and serves to preserve the peace and view corridors of LaQuinta, as other developments in or near Old Town have achieved to good effect. Name Name Sin #ure y1�0� Signatur� /'-ty��t/� . w'..L�21--- Printed Name n Printed Name Address -TV �C, Sc�_ LAM) 4 Address S � m rrd- Name Name Sinat a igna{ tu�e4PA I�Z�, Printed Name Printed Uame Address 79"7 J� Address O(cWAw � Name IrAQName Signature Signature tinted Nam Printed 70� Address i � Address r Name 7 Name gnal rUj, ^ - -- Printed me Q Address'l'Yo) Address Signature Printed Name 658 From: helen welsh <h welsh @yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 2:18:16 PM To: Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrev@la-guinta.org> Subject: project at Avenue 50 and Washington You don't often get email from h welsh@vahoo.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Many thanks Councilmember McGarrey for the time and energy you devote to keeping La Quinta a fabulous place to live. The proposed multi -family project at 50th and Washington is going to impact our community and we are definitely concerned. We reside at 50-505 Grand Traverse, one block south of Avenue 50 on Park. The traffic issues worry us the most since the elementary school and the Boy's and Girl's Club entrances are at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Park, which is a mess already. Even now, parents park along Avenue 50 and also along Park to pick up their children and which makes it dangerous for kids hopping into cars on those streets. The added students that will be attending both school and the Boy's and Girl's Club may add to that substantially. It was interesting that the Boy's and Girl's Club did not receive notification of this project as they have many issues, too. I suspect the school district was advised. As proposed, the project will allow only one parking space per unit which will not be adequate for the number of residents there. Will there be sufficient overflow areas for the extra cars? If not they will most likely have to park on the streets of adjacent communities and that will NOT bes the answer to the problem. The Planning Commission recommended not allowing this project. We sincerely hope you agree with them. Helen and Dick Welsh 659 From: Monika Radeva Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 7:31 AM To: mdskeese@gmail.com Cc: Danny Castro; Tania Flores; Cheri Flores; Jennifer Nelson; Jon McMillen; Deborah McGarrey; City Clerk Mail Subject: Skeese, Maureen - Written Comments - La Quinta Apartments Project SE corner of Avenue 50 and Washington St Monika Radeva, CMC I City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva(aDlaguintaca.gov Get Outlook for iOS From: maureen skeese <mdskeese@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2023 4:36:46 PM To: Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@la-guinta.org> Subject: Fwd: Washington and Avenue 50 [You don't often get email from mdskeese@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear Deborah McGarrey Please vote no on the proposed apartment project for the northeast corner of Washington and Avenue 50. Not one of my friends and neighbors is in favor of it being built at this location. I attended the latest two planning commission meetings. Nearly every commissioner at the first meeting voted no and echoed the concerns of the many La Quinta residents who spoke. However at the second meeting, their support was not as strong. One member disclosed that he attended an event that the developer was at "but didn't discuss the project". REALLY?!?! He voted yes! Another, who had previously voted no looked and sounded as though she had been coerced for this second vote which was a yes. One council member recused himself from the first meeting and was not at the second meeting. I certainly hope that council member did not influence others. All in all, very disappointing. I remember shortly after purchasing our home in La Quinta Fairways I heard that the lot we are discussing now was going to become an assisted living facility and the lot on the southwest corner was to become a nursing home (or vice versa). I thought, how nice, I'll never have to leave my lovely corner of BEAUTIFUL La Quinta! It would be great for someone (city council, city employees or other community members, headhunter type) to try to find another project like the one that was previously approved (single story as I recall). I think we have many people in La Quinta and surrounding areas that would be interested in living in such places. Our community is aging and home ownership becomes more difficult as the years pass by. - It So now I guess it's up to you. Please vote no on this project that is so wrong for this location in so many ways. Please do what is right for your constituents not what will enrich a few greedy people (including some planning committee members?) that have no concerns about our quality of life. Will this be your LEGACY-- "Mayor and Council Members approve three story apartment buildings in La Quinta ignoring pleas of their constituents!" Please vote no. Sincerely, Maureen Skeese 50115 Doral Street La Quinta, CA 92253 Sent from my iPad This exact correspondence was copied to the following Council Members: John Pena Deborah McGarrey Kathleen Fitzpatrick Steve Sanchez 661 From: Wilbert Friesen <wikfriesen@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 3:50:08 PM To: Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@la-quinta.org> Subject: Proposal to Build La Quinta Village Apartments You don't often get email from wlkfriesen@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. July 10, 2023 Council Member, Deborah McGarrey, City of La Quinta: We are writing to you today regarding the proposed development of the La Quinta Village Apartments complex (formerly Troutdale Apartments) on the corner of Washington Street & Avenue 50. We live adjacent to the proposed project in La Quinta Fairways, a complex with single family homes. Allow us to begin our letter by clearly stating that we are not opposed to the development of the 14 acres on the corner of Washington Street & Avenue 50. We are opposed to the current plan that was presented to the La Quinta City Planning Commission on June 27, 2023, for the following reasons: • The urban industrial style is out of place on the Avenue 50 & Washington corridor. The proposed new apartment development is surrounded by single family, single story tile roofed homes (with 12 two-story homes in La Quinta Fairways). In order to maintain the architectural integrity, the design of the project should be Spanish -style with stucco and tile roofs. The proposed project will stick out, completely out of place with the homes and school in this corridor. • In the updated proposal submitted to the City, several of the buildings have been reduced in height from 3 to 2 stories, however, several 3-story buildings remain, increasing the height from 22-feet to 40- feet. The 40-feet height is out of compliance with the municipal code, and unacceptable in the Avenue 50 & Washington corridor. Please do not change the code requirement to approve the project. • The project site will require an additional lane and bus turnout on Washington, and Avenue 50 will need to be expanded. Hundreds of additional daily trips will be necessary in and out of La Quinta Village Apartments. Based on the project proposal, U-turns will be required on Avenue 50 and Washington, setting up a dangerous situation for school students, bikes, and vehicles on two streets with fast moving vehicles. Additionally, an updated traffic study has not been completed, and must be required for the City to consider the project. For these reasons alone, the project proposal must be rejected. The charm and ambience of the City of La Quinta is missing in the proposed project. Sincerely, Glenna Wahl Friesen 50720 Cypress Point Drive Dr. Wilbert Friesen 50720 Cypress Point Drive ... To our City Council: Outside of the many technical concerns with this proposed project there are concerns with the documented project compliance issues and character of the developer. When the project goes off script and against codes which history has shown this developer is willing to do, what is the City prepared to do to enforce compliance? Past deviations have only resulted in fines that the developer was willing to pay to get done what HE wanted to do regardless of being told that he couldn't. Is the city willing to make the developer undo those things rather than a fine and just letting the deviations continue on? Is the City willing to stipulate that this is exactly the steps they would take regardless of the cost to the developer? Is the City willing to lawyer up against the team of lawyers the developer will bring to the table in an effort to enforce full compliance? We as residents and the city acknowledge that something is going to be built in both lots, the NE corner and the SE corner of Washington and 50t". If feels like the city almost has a build whatever, just build something attitude towards those lots and fix whatever problems it would cause later. The city has a plan for a bridge over the wash on 50th, just east of Washington but it doesn't appear to take into account new development traffic impact on either side of the road. Some of those things that we have concerns about are a median to prevent left hand turns and egress lanes into and out of the communities, bike lanes, sidewalks. Is there enough land there for the city to work with that can accommodate all of these things? Has the city or will the city look at that intersection and pre- emptively determine what the appropriate traffic impact should be from those two lots at that intersection and adjust the zoning as needed so that appropriate developments are considered? I hope that you, our City Council will take the planning commissions lead on this and pass on this development and start discussions within the council, the planning commission and with the residents to better understand the impacts of development at this intersection and entrance to La Quinta and come up with preferred developments that we can all approve of and view as a benefit to our wonderful city. Thank you for your consideration of these thoughts, Leslie C. Mier 78049 Calle Norte La Quinta, CA 92253 663 From: Ron Beeler <ronbeeler@fpps.us> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 2:23 PM To: Tania Flores Cc: Robin Poole; priestlake69@gmail.com; Laura Bulrice; corcoran.erin.a@gmail.com; Ron Delaney Subject: Written Comments by Duna La Quinta HOA Regarding the La Quinta Village Revised Site Plan Submittal to be heard at the City Council Meeting on August 1, 2023 Attachments: Village apartment concerns.pdf EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Ms Flores and members of the City Council of La Quinta We understand the complexities of balancing the needs of developers and the community and appreciate your efforts to ensure that the interest of both parties is considered. However, we feel that the Village Apartment project will have a negative impact on our community, particularly with regards to traffic congestion and the lack of infrastructure. We hope that you will take our concerns into consideration (Please see attached letter) as you continue to make decisions that affect the future of La Quinta. Thank You Ron Beeler, President Duna Gardens HOA Cell: (714) 267-7209 ronbeeler@fpps.us 664 Letter of Opposition to La Quinta Village Apartments 7/24/2023 Cheri Flores City of La Quinta Planning Department Members of the La Quinta City Council 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: La Quinta Village (formerly Troutdale Village) Site Plan APN 646-070-016 August 1st agenda item Hello Ms. Flores and City Council! I am writing/resending this letter to you as the President of the Board of Directors for Duna Gardens HOA, which is located on the south side of Avenue 50 between Washington Street and Eisenhower Blvd. Our community, Duna La Qunita Community, consists of three HOAs. The Duna Gardens HOA Community in which I represent consists of 91 single family and condominium units. We support and concur with the letter from Keith G. Meyer, President, Duna La Quinta HOA No.1 dated June 23, 2023. We also must express our opposition to the proposed La Quinta Village apartments project. Our concerns stem from the project's location and the inadequate access from Washington Street and Avenue 50, the expected increase in traffic, the proposed increase in allowable building height from 22 ft. to 40 ft., and the significant impact on the views along Avenue 50. The lack of parking spaces will indeed lead to overcrowding, especially if families share units, and it will cause problems for the surrounding community when overflow parking becomes an issue. It's important for developers to consider the needs of both the residents and the community when planning projects like this and in this case, it appears that only the developers needs are met due to the development of a postage -Stamp size corner lot supporting 252 residents and 520 parking spaces. I can't believe that the developer could possibly mitigate the impact of an additional 520 cars a day making U turns at Washington and 50t" to enter the apartments. We strongly urge the City of La Quinta to reject the Site Development Permit, General Plan Amendment, and Specific Plan for the La Quinta Village apartments. We also request that separate Environmental Impact Statements be conducted for the Project and for the Citywide General Plan amendment that would permit higher building heights in residential communities. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Ron Beeler President, Duna Gardens HOA 78262 Calle Las Ramblas La Quinta, CA 92253 (714) 267-7209 665 From: Larry Garcia <Ioanshark02@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 8:47 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: Proposed Project: NE Corner of Washington & Avenue 50 You don't often get email from loanshark02@att.net. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL- This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. LaQuinta City Council Members We urge the City Council NOT to approve this project for the following reasons: At 252 units, some 3-story (and without elevators), this proposed development is too dense for the surrounding neighborhoods. (Without the so-called "Density Bonus", code for developing this property is limited to 177 units.) With 522 parking spaces, traffic on Avenue 50 is sure to increase significantly, resulting in less safety and increased noise and light pollution, thus impairing quality of life and, in some cases, interrupting view corridors of existing residents. The proposed height of the three-story units is 28 feet, six feet or 27% above the 22-foot code. :1 There are questions about the whether the proposed development compromises the safety of children who attend the nearby Middle School and Boys & Girls Club, located at Moon River Drive. Many of these children walk, roller blade or ride their bikes to/from school. The safety situation is exacerbated by the U-turns at Eastbound Avenue 50 and the Park/Moon River intersection that will be required to access the proposed property. :1 The property is owned by a company in Oregon; the developer is in Costa Mesa, both with little vested interest in preserving the quality of life that we have come to enjoy as LaQuinta residents. We agree that development this vacant property is inevitable and can be a positive for the City. BUT it can and should be developed in a manner that maintains the charm, style and serves to preserve the peace and view corridors of LaQuinta, as other developments in or near Old Town have achieved to good effect. Thankyou Larry Garcia 50740 Grand Traverse Ave La Qu i nta CA i 666 From: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 7:58 PM To: Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laguintaca.gov>; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: Project at Washington & Avenue 50 Linda Evans Mayor City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 Cell: 760.899.3279 www.laquintaca.gov www.playinlaquinta.com From: soismile@aol.com <soismile@aol.com> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 5:26:57 PM To: John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@lag uintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@lag uintaca.gov>; Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@la-quinta.org> Subject: Project at Washington & Avenue 50 You don't often get email from soismile@aol.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Council Members, With all the negative news, we would like to express our encouragement for the proposed complex at the corner of Washington and Avenue 50. We live on that very corner, Duna La Quinta, and would like to see that property put to good use. Please count us a favorable for the development. We need more like this in our area. We can handle the traffic. Thanks, Donald & Georgenia Schmidt 78099 Calle Norte La Quinta 667 July 26, 2023 Re: Proposed Site of the La Quinta Village Apartments I am writing to plead with the City Council to consider the concerns of their constituents. The name alone, of the proposed site, should raise a red flag. Does their rendering really reflect La Quinta? Does it reflect the "old town" feel? Does it take into consideration the surrounding neighborhood? I think if you really look at it, the answer is NO to all of the questions. When there was the proposal for the Senior rehab center, there was little to no opposition. It did not impair the views, it did not affect the traffic, it did not change the architecture of the La Quinta neighborhood, and they were going to bury the power polls that are on the north part of the property. We have seen the changes that The Irwin Group are going to make from the original plans. Lowering 7 of the 3 story buildings down to 3 %. That is not enough. The change should be to make them all 2 story buildings. Spread the complex out more. Once you approve any 3 story buildings, you set a precedent for more to come. Do we really want that? Do they really need a pickle ball court? The city already has a very nice facility for that. I feel that they can rearrange their plot plan and accommodate our wishes. Traffic is a major concern regardless of the studies that have been performed. The schools and the boys and girls club were not informed of this proposed construction. Don't you think that this would be a concern for them? Traffic will be heavier during the school year, children walking to school and having to circumvent the cars going in and out of the property. U turns being made at the intersection of the school property. The Irwin Group shows that they have 107 ADA apartments, but do you realize they only have 10 ADA assigned parking spaces? They say that this is affordable housing. Normal 1 bedroom apartments in La Quinta are renting from between $1800 t0 $2200 per month, therefore in order to be considered affordable housing, should these not rent for less. These new units, priced at $1900 for a 1 bedroom 600+sq ft apartment would only be affordable if you have 3 working tenants in 1 bedroom. The 2 bedroom even worse. You would need , 3-5 working tenants. I realize that we need affordable, low income housing. Plainly this is not it. They have pointed out that the corner of Fred Waring and Washington would be the site for this Low Income Housing, where is the owner of that property. Is it fair and just to pawn off the problem to them? Finally, I would like to address trust. We had a building on Washington that was going to be a museum, what happened? The Silver Rock area that is set to be developed, what is happening with that? Will this be another eyesore that doesn't finish? Can we trust this company to finish what they start? If due diligence is really performed can you say that this will carry through in the manner that is expected and that this company is trustworthy? I implore you to listen to the People of La Quinta. Thank you for your time, Michael and Carol Herrick 78580 Saguaro Rd La Quinta, Ca 92235 ..; From: Monika Radeva Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 2:57 PM To: Tania Flores Cc: Cheri Flores; Danny Castro; City Clerk Mail Subject: Howward, Tammy & Jerry: No to La Quinta Village Written comments for the project file. Thank you. Monika Radeva, CMC I City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva(a-lacluintaca.gov From: Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@la-quinta.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 2:56 PM To: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: No to La Quinta Village Fyi Get Outlook for iOS From: PetFlysRocks <tammvpetflvs@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 2:06:40 PM To: ClFlores@ lag uintaca.gov <ClFlores@laguintaca.gov>; levans@laquinta.gov <levans@laquinta.gov>; ssanchez@laquintac.gov <ssanchez@laquintac.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrev@la-quinta.org>; John Pena <ipena@laquintaca.gov> Subject: No to La Quinta Village Some people who received this message don't often get email from tammvpetflvs@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. July 26, 2023 Re: Proposed Site of the La Quinta Village Apartments I am writing to plead with the City Council to consider the concerns of their constituents. The name alone, of the proposed site, should raise a red flag. Does their rendering really reflect La Quinta? Does it reflect the "old town" feel? Does it take into consideration the surrounding neighborhood? I think if you really look at it, the answer is NO to all of the questions. When there was the proposal for the Senior rehab center, there was little to no opposition. It did not impair the views, it did not affect the traffic, it did not change the architecture of the La Quinta neighborhood, and ..• they were going to bury the power polls that are on the north part of the property. We have seen the changes that The Irwin Group are going to make from the original plans. Lowering 7 of the 3 story buildings down to 3 2. That is not enough. The change should be to make them all 2 story buildings. Spread the complex out more. Once you approve any 3 story buildings, you set a precedent for more to come. Do we really want that? Do they really need a pickle ball court? The city already has a very nice facility for that. I feel that they can rearrange their plot plan and accommodate our wishes. Traffic is a major concern regardless of the studies that have been performed. The schools and the boys and girls club were not informed of this proposed construction. Don't you think that this would be a concern for them? Traffic will be heavier during the school year, children walking to school and having to circumvent the cars going in and out of the property. U turns being made at the intersection of the school property. The Irwin Group shows that they have 107 ADA apartments, but do you realize they only have 10 ADA assigned parking spaces? They say that this is affordable housing. Normal 1 bedroom apartments in La Quinta are renting from between $1800 t0 $2200 per month, therefore in order to be considered affordable housing, should these not rent for less. These new units, priced at $1900 for a 1 bedroom 600+sq ft apartment would only be affordable if you have 3 working tenants in 1 bedroom. The 2 bedroom even worse. You would need , 3-5 working tenants. I realize that we need affordable, low income housing. Plainly this is not it. They have pointed out that the corner of Fred Waring and Washington would be the site for this Low Income Housing, where is the owner of that property. Is it fair and just to pawn off the problem to them? Finally, I would like to address trust. We had a building on Washington that was going to be a museum, what happened? The Silver Rock area that is set to be developed, what is happening with that? Will this be another eyesore that doesn't finish? Can we trust this company to finish what they start? If due diligence is really performed can you say that this will carry through in the manner that is expected and that this company is trustworthy? I implore you to listen to the People of La Quinta. Thank you for your time, Tammy & Jerry Howard 78775 Sagebrush Ave La Quinta, Ca 92235 0 670 From: Ruth Waytz <rwaytz@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 5:24 PM To: Tania Flores Subject: Irwin Partners hearing RE: Washington and Ave 50 (APN 646-070-016 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello - My name is Ruth Waytz and I live in Montero Estates, across from the proposed apartments at Washington and Avenue 50. 1 have attended the Planning Commission meetings and voiced my opposition to this terrible project. I'm grateful the planning commission decided not to recommend this project go forward. There are so many problems! I'm not sure which I think is the most serious, so this is a random order. Traffic Contrary to what the developer claims, traffic will be dramatically increased at and and near this corner for several reasons. The entry gate can accommodate only three cars, meaning we will frequently see traffic backed up onto the streets. Access will require a massive increase in U-turns, which are already incredibly dangerous. The developer said something like 10 additional U-turns per day. 500 residents and only 10 people leaving the house per day? Wrong. And insulting. Mention was made of widening of Avenue 50 as part of the proposed bridge project. I know you know that project could take six years to complete and hasn't even started. The developer is acting as if Avenue 50 already has that extra lane. It doesn't. Architectural style I know they claim they revised the style and now it's "Mediterranean," but it still looks like glorified storage units or a Residence Inn to me. It's a giant eyesore and it doesn't look like anything else anywhere around it. I'm not sure how that piece of land got rezoned, but everything around it is low density. Everything. I know the developer knocked back their request from high density to medium high, but that is still way more than our neighborhood can tolerate. One of the speakers at one of the planning commission meetings treated us to a lovely history of the historic architectural style of La Quinta. This project does not fit in with our style and theme. It's big, cheap, and ugly. Further, the development still has three-story buildings, inadequate parking, and no elevators. This is a hazard for older or disabled residents, as well as anybody who might want to move a piece of furniture into their apartment. In the last planning commission meeting, the developer flat out admitted the elevators would have been too expensive. What other safety corners are they cutting? 671 Low income/affordable housing Much has been said about this, and the City's mandate to add affordable housing — but this isn't that! This complex will not have low income housing. Its lower priced units are roughly 600 ft.' and about $2000 a month. I don't know where that counts as affordable housing, but those prices are not low and I don't think you could get a roommate in a 600 square -foot apartment. Irwin Partners This developer is already notorious for breaking/ignoring laws. This is a very slippery slope. Dealing with someone whose response to being made aware of the law and still deliberately breaking it is, "so sue me" is less than ideal. Power station Yes, we could use a new Power Station, and this complex absolutely cannot exist on the current grid. But this expansion is no gift, and I'm not willing to let the developer ruin our neighborhood with promises that benefit IID and the city like someone jangling car keys to distract a baby. NIMBY I'm aware of the objections to our objections, stating something is going to be developed on that corner, no matter what, and that anyone opposed is a "Karen" or a crybaby. I'm certain that corner will be developed, but we have an obligation to the city of La Quinta and its residents to maintain our quality of life and aesthetics. This is just the wrong project for this corner. I know you're going to get lots more letters that go into more detail. I never seem to be able to think of everything when I sit down to write, but I want my opinion recorded and counted. I will be attending the meeting on August 1. Thank you for your time and consideration, Ruth (Turns out this phone isn't full of candy after all.) z 672 From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Get Outlook for iOS Deborah McGarrey Sunday, July 9, 2023 10:29 PM Monika Radeva; Jon McMillen; Jennifer Nelson Fwd: Washington and Avenue 50 Follow up Completed From: maureen skeese <mdskeese@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2023 4:36:46 PM To: Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@la-quinta.org> Subject: Fwd: Washington and Avenue 50 [You don't often get email from mdskeese@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear Deborah McGarrey > Please vote no on the proposed apartment project for the northeast corner of Washington and Avenue 50. Not one of my friends and neighbors is in favor of it being built at this location. > I attended the latest two planning commission meetings. Nearly every commissioner at the first meeting voted no and echoed the concerns of the many La Quinta residents who spoke. However at the second meeting, their support was not as strong. One member disclosed that he attended an event that the developer was at "but didn't discuss the project". REALLY?!?! He voted yes! Another, who had previously voted no looked and sounded as though she had been coerced for this second vote which was a yes. One council member recused himself from the first meeting and was not at the second meeting. I certainly hope that council member did not influence others. All in all, very disappointing. > I remember shortly after purchasing our home in La Quinta Fairways I heard that the lot we are discussing now was going to become an assisted living facility and the lot on the southwest corner was to become a nursing home (or vice versa). I thought, how nice, I'll never have to leave my lovely corner of BEAUTIFUL La Quinta! It would be great for someone (city council, city employees or other community members, headhunter type) to try to find another project like the one that was previously approved (single story as I recall). I think we have many people in La Quinta and surrounding areas that would be interested in living in such places. Our community is aging and home ownership becomes more difficult as the years pass by. > So now I guess it's up to you. Please vote no on this project that is so wrong for this location in so many ways. Please do what is right for your constituents not what will enrich a few greedy people (including some planning committee members?) that have no concerns about our quality of life. Will this be your LEGACY-- "Mayor and Council Members approve three story apartment buildings in La Quinta ignoring pleas of their constituents!" Please vote no. 673 > Sincerely, > Maureen Skeese > 50115 Doral Street > La Quinta, CA 92253 > Sent from my Wad 674 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 5 DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT t(VQu�ttd, GEM ofibe DESFR-E QUARTERLY REPORT The Design and Development Department consists of three divisions: Building, The Hub, and Planning r LrU Building Division The Building Division administers and issues all residential and commercial building permit applications, reviews plans (plan checks), and conducts on -site building inspections for compliance with the La Quinta Municipal Code and California Building Standards Code. PLAN CHECK AND BUILDING PERMITS Ep Plan Check Submittals -21 % from Q2 2022 1,142 - -------------i-----------r--------r-------897----- 821 691 476 -----�------ -.------------- ------r----- 2019 2021 2022 2023 Building Permits Issued 7 % from Q2 2022 1,101 - - i 615 i 676 520 i -----y--------------------y----------y----------y-----' 2019 2020 2022 2023 5 year Second Quarter Trend +30% 5 year Second Quarter Trend +66% 675 IND. Plan Check Fees $374,3272nd Quarter Total $197k $117k $103k $85k $75k $60k ■ . 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 APRIL MAY JUNE +42P8 from 02 2022 total of $264,039 - ---T---------- T---------- ---------- r---------- r---- $374k $264k $164k $157k $172k 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 5 year Second Quarter Trend +128% Y • Building Permit Fees $823�0822nd Quarter Total $479k $439k $278k $148k $106k $124k 1 M a 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 APRIL MAY JUNE +ION from 02 2022 total of $750,454 ' $823k $750k L__________ L_________J___ $188k $243k 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 5 year Second Quarter Trend -337% The Hub serves as a one -stop permit center. It is the central location for obtaining permits for planning, building, engineering, business licenses, and special events. The Hub also issues licenses and permits for items such as garage sales, home occupations, HVAC/windows/waterheater/utility change outs pool drains, and re -roofs. Business Licenses Other Licenses and Permits 1 8 0 from Q2 2022 + O . 4 /0 from Q2 2022 295 245 287 177 232 190 201 206 169 217 206 on 244 I■ . ■ ■ I I 11 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 APRIL MAY JUNE APRIL MAY JUNE 807 i 720 667 670 61 549 501 492 i 422 i 220 i 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 5 year Second Quarter Trend +44% Includes all phone calls received by the Concierge, the Hub general line, and all Permit Technicians. Apr 2023 May 2023 Jun 2023 0 1000 2000 3000 5 year Second Quarter Trend +22% Includes all visitors checked in by the Concierge. Apr 2023 May 2023 Jun 2023 0 250 500 750 The Planning Division administers the zoning and development standards and works with residential and commercial developers, architects, builders, and businesses to ensure that development is consistent with the City's Zoning Code and General Plan. Planning staff coordinates with the Planning Commission, whose primary function is to develop and maintain the City's General Plan, consider development applications, as well as to serve as an advisory body to the City Council. PLANNING PERMITS 5 5 % from Q2 2022 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 APRIL MAY JUNE 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 5 year Second Quarter Trend +17% PLANNING PROJECTS 3 8 % from Q2 2022 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 APRIL MAY JUNE 24 ---;-;--------�� ------------1'5 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 5 year Second Quarter Trend +114% • A 477 sf kitchen addition to the Andalusia Clubhouse including interior renovations. Interior garage clearance at 52065 Avenida Navarro. Interior wall dimensions for a new garage at 51630 Avenida Villa. Landscape plans for the new drive-thru Panera Bread Bakery Cafe located at 78902 Highway 111. Landscape plans for Palo Verde residential development located north of Avenue 58, west of Madison, east of Coral Mountain Ct. Increase to wall height at 57910 Stone Creek. Site improvements to the Quarry Clubhouse including a 421 sf addition to an existing building and new enclosure. Landscape plans for Point Happy residential development located south of Highway 111, west of Washington, and north of Crest View Terrace. Sign Program Amendment at Komar Desert Center for Longhorn Steakhouse at 78705 Highway 111. Reduction of front yard setback for a remodel addition at 52273 Avenida Madero. Outdoor patio improvements and landscape plans at Stuft Pizza located at 78015 Main St. Increase of maximum wall height at 50695 Calle Paloma. Adjustment for rear setback encroachments at 51000 Avenida Ramirez. Interior garage dimensions and front yard setback for rebuild of a residence at 53201 Avenida Martinez. • Approved Conditional Use Permits and Site Development Permits for four Village Hospitality Homes located on four properties in the Village Commercial Zone at 51120 Avenida Martinez, 51116 Avenida Mendoza, 51080 Avenida Martinez, and 51100 Avenida Martinez. • Made a finding of General Plan consistency for a proposed street vacation of a 1,823 sf portion of land at the southwest corner of Avenida Montezuma and Avenida Carranza right-of-way. Recommended City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, and Conditional Use Permit for La Villetta at Avenue 58 - an 80-unit single-family residential project located south of Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street. Recommended to City Council adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for an Environmental Assessment for the La Quinta Village Apartments (formerly known as Troutdale) project located at the northeast corner of WashOVon Street and Avenue 50. Residential Development Point Happy_ Piazza Serena IVO- off 7 p7 Palo Verde Stone Creek r+r 01 Commercial Development Panera Drive-Thru Now Open Longhorn Steakhouse Under Construction Tesla EV Charging Stations Village Shopping Center Stuft Pizza Patio Upgrades Under Construction RD RNNR New Location in Old Town Universal EV Charging Stations near Sprouts M. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO.7 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT TO: Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst DATE: August 1, 2023 SUBJECT DISCUSS LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION PROJECT 2016-03 TO INCLUDE AN ACTIVITIES PROMENADE; LOCATION: CACTUS FLOWER DEVELOPMENT The final phase of the La Quinta Landscape Renovation Project 2016-03 is preparing for construction. During the design for the final phase of the overall landscape project, an approximate 2,400 square foot unutilized paved area was identified as an opportunity to provide amenities to the community. The space is located between two retention basins at the end of Buttercup Lane (Attachment 1). Staff developed a concept for the Cactus Flower Activities Promenade (Activities Promenade) that would include: • Two (2) pickleball courts, including fencing: • Two (2) table tennis; • One (1) foosball table; • One (1) cornhole set. Staff conducted in -person door-to-door public outreach in the Cactus Flower community for the Activities Promenade providing a postcard with a survey and photo rendering of the proposed improvements (Attachment 2). Feedback from the community was overwhelmingly positive when staff spoke with residents on June 23 and June 26, 2023. Staff proposes to include construction of the Activities Promenade as an additive alternate bid option with the Cactus Flower landscape improvements. The total anticipated cost for the Activities Promenade is $170,000. There is sufficient funding available in the current project budget for these improvements. The preliminary engineer's estimate for the proposed amenities is included in Attachment 3. The following are the general construction costs by amenity, not including soft costs: • Two (2) pickleball courts*: $35,000 each *including surfacing, nets, fencing and general construction costs • Two (2) table tennis: $13,500 each • One (1) foosball table: $15,000 • One (1) cornhole set: $3,500 • Adjustment of two (2) catch basin covers: $2,500 each 681 The La Quinta Landscape Renovation Project 2016-03 budget is as follows: Total Budget Expended To Phase 7 Jefferson Cactus Flower Activities (All Phases)* Date Cactus Flower Street Promenade Professional: $ 547,258 $ 242,715 $ 30,000 $ 2,000 $ 10,000 Design: $ 699,212 $ 518,047 $ 76,610 $ 6,000 $ 12,000 Inspection/ TestingSurvey: $ 677,242 $ 69,758 $ 40,000 $ 2,000 $ 12,000 Construction: $ 6,970,407 $4,930,967 $1,336,060 $ 95,000 $ 120,500 Contingency: $ 1,069,029 $ 0 $ 134,000 $ 10,000 $ 15,500 Total Budget: $ 9,963,148 $5,761,487 $1,616,670 $ 115,000 $ 170,000 *Note: This is the last phase in the multi -year Landscaping Renovation Project. The proposed timeline for construction would align with the Cactus Flower Landscape improvements and the following proposed project schedule: Council Bid Authorization Bid Period Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (70 Working Days) Accept Improvements August 1, 2023 August 2 to September 12, 2023 October 3, 2023 October 4 to October 30, 2023 October 2023 to February 2024 February 2024 Staff is seeking Council interest in constructing the Cactus Flower Activities Promenade with the final phase of the La Quinta Landscape Renovation Project. Attachments 1: Vicinity Map and Activities Promenade Rendering 2: Community Outreach 3: Activities Promenade Preliminary Engineer's Estimate Vicinity Map Caclus Rnv er AcliVilie5 Promenade Loyal ion I - ' i , �ti .i•I r tl - I r 3 � ` ■" 40 r Cactus Flower Activities Promenade ATTACHMENT 1 Vicinity Map Legend -, - / s-:Ktu-l_erActi4itie3Promenade Site Parkhiu Available f ► 4 -.1 41 PR kOIL ' • rw '� � ■■ I � E _ a L �• � r� _ � i � w t tin 17JF 50 683 ?.w Site Mew Car tus Flavver Arbvrtie5 Prumsnacle LoEation A .MCI, ArX*" S" -Ab— A Wook Google Earth i 146 on" A 1� 47 07 Cactus Flower Activities Promenade ATTACHMENT 2 Community Outreach Cactus Flower Nei borhood ' .�ciiv&s Promenade Public Outreach m8p r J .x Legend 0*Spoke with resident ' s 4 • — ' f `^ 1 f # M1 ..❑f50f-t&DOC(181kPd!0r891dPrli5aildhand beiiveredpostCards I' •.. Outreach Area (received pdSt t0T d viz hand delivery) t •4 'Fri4L "Wit • �i { ^� 44 687 . `fir•, '.-�`�'-, ..� x �, f �.�� _�Ike CACTUS FLOWER ACTIVITI ES PROMENADE The City of La Quinta is seeking community input on approval to create an activities promenade in the Cactus Flower neighborhood. The City of La Quinta is seeking community input on upgrading the common area in the Cactus Flower neighborhood. If the community approves this use, the Cactus Flower Activities Promenade would provide a pocket park environment for the community to enjoy amenities that could include two pickleball courts, foosball, corn hole game, and ping pong, with seating and shade available. Scan the QR Code to begin the survey Cactus Flower Activities Promenade ATTACHMENT 3 Preliminary Engineer's Estimate ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 1 Mobilization LS 1 $11,000 $11,000 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $2,000 $2,000 3 Dust Control LS 1 $5,000 $5,000 4 Unclassified Excavation LS 1 $7,000 $7,000 5 At Grade Concrete Pad SF 860 $12.00 $10,500 6 Install 2 Pickleball Courts including surfacing and nets LS 1 $12,000.00 $12,000 7 Construct 4' tubular steel fence with single gate LF 150 $150.00 $22,500 8 Cornhole EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500 9 Table Tennis EA 2 $13,500.00 $27,000 10 Foosball Table EA 1 $15,000.00 $15,000 11 Adjust Catch Basin Cover EA 2 $2,500.00 $5,000 Comments/Assumptions: 1 Assume asphalt will not need to be repaired 2 Removal of Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk. Replacement with concrete pad at grade Sub Total Construction: $120,500 Construction: $120,500 Design: $12,000 Professional: $10,000 Insp/Test/Survey: $12,000 Contingency: $15,500 Total Preliminary Estimate: $170,000 3 Assume City will pre -purchase site furnishings REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 27 palm spr'ings INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION MARKETING AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA Airport Conference Room, Palm Springs International Airport 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Wednesday, July 12, 2023, at 3:30 P.M. Submit your public comment to the Marketing and Business Development Committee electronically. Material may be emailed to: Christina. brown (55).palmspringsca.gov - Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Marketing and Business Development Committee and retained for the official record. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. POSTING OF AGENDA 3. ROLL CALL 4. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Limited to three minutes 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 22, 2023 7. ACTION AND DISCUSSION ITEMS: 7.A Brand Launch Update 7.113 Customer Experience Review 7.0 Advertising Review 8. COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS AND REQUESTS 9. ADJOURNMENT AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director, City of Palm Springs, California, hereby certify this agenda was posted on July 5, 2023, in accordance with established policies and procedures. PUBLIC NOTICES Pursuant to G.C. Section 54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with the meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way. Complete Agenda Packets are available for public inspection at: City Hall Office of the City Clerk. Agenda and staff reports are available on the City's website www.palmspringsca.gov. If you would like additional information on any item appearing on this agenda, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204. It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Department of Aviation, (760) 318-3800, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. 691 Palm Springs Airport Marketing and Business Development Committee Report — July 12, 2023 Discussion and Action Report: • Brand Launch Update —July 6tn was the official launch date of the new logo and branding for the airport. The website was updated and the doormat outside the terminal all had the new colorful logo. On July 101n interviews were held with Desert Sun and KESQ. Social media campaign also kicked off. New uniforms, pole banners, neck lanyards have all been ordered for the roll -out over the summer. Feedback has been extremely positive both from staff and consumers. By October everything should be rebranded with the colorful contemporary logotype with modernism flair. • Customer Experience Review — New airport staff are being hired to implement and support Daniel Meier, Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing & Air Service. Presently he is juggling a lot of balls in the air and admits how challenging it is. There is an annual budget of $250,000 to develop programs that will enhance the customer experience. Some of the ones that he presented to the marketing committee were: Good Maps — visually impaired, Sky Squad — concierge service that passengers can pay for meet & greets or other assistance, therapy dogs more accessibility, Sunflowers — those with hidden disabilities to gain special attention, etc ... Other airports are already utilizing these programs and he will gain feedback from them. The committee agreed that these can now be presented to the entire commission at our meeting on the 19tn Some other ideas that would also utilize this same budget are: Lost & Found — a company independently presents items on the airport website and passenger identifies the item and then pays to have it shipped to their home address, Gate Pass — allows the airport to provide gate passes to family to be able to go beyond security into the food and bar area prior to their take -off or be at the gate when they arrive. This would handle some of airport congestion in a positive manner as during season it can be very hectic by the main entrance to the airport. The airport can restrict the number of gate passes at any given time of the day. Ship It Home — gives the passenger the opportunity to ship their baggage home rather than pay for it as checked luggage. Touch Tones or Quiet Zone — two programs which one can add favorite music by choosing songs to be amplified. On the contrary is Quiet Zone which will reduce the frantic sounds of gate agents announcing last calls to board, paging passengers and making announcements. A soothing taped voice will make all announcements in a zen tone to create tranquility in the airport. (this is becoming quite popular in Europe.) • Advertising Review — In late August and early September the marketing will pick up with new routes, holiday travel schedules and benefits of flying out of PSP. The advertising efforts have been extended to Redlands and Riverside touting the ease of flying out of Palm Springs. Once the restaurants/bars/shopping concessions open these campaigns will be expanded. The Marketing Committee agreed that Daniel Meier can move forward and present these concepts once specific cost of each marketing opportunity is identified to the general airport commission meeting on Wednesday, July 19`n. There is no future Marketing and Business Development Committee meeting scheduled at this time. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 28 aw. W_.4 21 palm INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Airport Conference Room, Palm Springs International Airport 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - 5:30 P.M. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. There will be in -person public access to the meeting location. To submit your public comment to the Airport Commission electronically. Material may be emailed to: Christina. brown(a)palmspringsca.gov - Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Airport Commission and retained for the official record. This is a hybrid in -person and virtual meeting. To virtually observe the meeting or to virtually provide public comments, please use the following Zoom link https://us02web.zoom.us/i/86019815290?pwd=ZitOZDIVeGZhNUNEQTVkU29nTUdPdzO9 or call (669) 900-6833 and enter Meeting ID: 860 1981 5290 - Passcode: 583916 City of Palm Springs: Riverside County: Margaret Park City of Cathedral City: Tony Michaelis City of Palm Desert: Kevin Wiseman Aftab Dada - Chair David Feltman Kevin J. Corcoran Vice Chair J Craig Fong City of Indian Wells: Robert Berriman City of Coachella: Denise Delgado City of Rancho Mirage: Keith Young Gerald Adams Tracy Martin Todd Burke Scott G. Miller City of La Quinta: Kathleen Hughes City of Desert Hot Springs: Jan Pye City of Indio: Rick Wise Daniel Caldwell M. Guillermo Suero Palm Springs City Staff Scott C. Stiles Harry Barrett Jr., A.A.E. Jeremy Keating City Manager Airport Executive Director Assistant Airport Director 1. CALL TO ORDER — PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. POSTING OF AGENDA 3. ROLL CALL 4. NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF OFFICERS 5. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Limited to three minutes on any subject within the purview of the Commission 693 Airport Commission Meeting Agenda July 19, 2023 — Page 2 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Airport Commission Regular Meeting of March 15, 2023 8. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS: 8.A Airport Commissioner Daniel Caldwell (Palm Springs) 8.113 Airport Commissioner J Craig Fong (Palm Springs) 8.0 Airport Commissioner Denise Delgado (Coachella) 8.113 Airport Commissioner Robert Berriman (Indian Wells) 8.E Airport Commissioner Margaret Park (Riverside County) 9. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: 9.A Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee Update 9.113 Ad Hoc Design Review Committee Update 9.0 Marketing and Business Development Committee Update 9.11) Marketing and Air Service Update 9.E Financial Summary Update 9.F Concessions Update 9.G Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update 10. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 11. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS 12. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTIONS: 12.A Past City Council Actions 12.113 Future City Council Actions 13. RECEIVE AND FILE: 13.A Airline Activity Report June 2023 13.113 Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison 14. COMMITTEES: 14.A Future Committee Meetings ADJOURNMENT: The Airport Commission will adjourn to a Regular Meeting on September 20, 2023, at 5:30 P.M. 694 Palm Springs Airport Commission Report —July 19, 2023 Meeting Nomination & Election of Officers —Aftab Dada and Kevin Corcoran will remain as Chair and Vice Chair. There were no other nominees from the City of Palm Springs. Introduction of New Commissioners - 5 new commissioners were sworn in Discussion and Action Items: Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee Update — None of these committees had updates Ad Hoc Design Review — Kevin Cochran, Committee Chairperson, stated they have run into an issue with the projected images planned for the ceiling of the Cactus to the Clouds Bar & Bistro. Alternative ideas will be discussed. Marketing and Business Development Committee Update — Todd Burke, Committee Chairperson, reviewed some of the creative ideas that are being considered by Daniel Meier, Marketing Director and his team. Since I serve on this committee, I have shared these ideas with city council and staff last week in a report. When he brought up the concept of branding the Regional Jet or Sono Bono concourse as a possible opportunity for community sponsorship with revenue returning to the airport budget Fund 415, commissioners started getting very nervous. The City Attorney wisely spoke up and stated he would be reviewing any type of contract proposed and it would then be voted on by city council. Marketing and Air Service Update - Daniel Meier reported that June 2023 passenger count was down 2.9% from 2022 at a total of 138, 461 total passengers. He believes this is because of the international travel rebound, large increase in demand for travel to Canada and Europe. Florida and other US mainland tourist destinations are also experiencing a decline. Scheduled departing seats as of today for August and September are down by over 10% each month but up 4.4% for October. It is also important to note that the number of scheduled departing seats when compared from 2023 to 2022 is less in the summer months: August: - 15.2% September: - 12.8% October: +4.4% November: +1.2% Financial Summary Update —Victoria Carpenter, Finance Director, reported that Fund 405 — Customer Service Facility Charges (car rentals) has finalized the year with the highest revenue yet at $8,873,730. (Last year was $5,465,000.) Much of this is due to the new means of charging drivers from a percentage of the transaction to a flat fee for each day of the car rental. Fund 410 — Passenger Facility Charges (from airline tickets) has not yet been finalized but is projected to have a surplus of $5.4 million. 695 Fund 415 — Airport Operations & Maintenance — is 52% more than last year at $52,501,268. Much of this is due to the collection of grant funding from the pandemic. These funds have been targeted for airport projects and upgrades which are greatly needed. Concessions Update — Jeremy Keating, Assistant Airport Director, notes that there is progress behind the scenes continues and meetings held weekly. The addition of the new Aviation Planner who has been hired is anxiously anticipated. Presently there are 20 design packets under staff review with new concessions coming on board between September 5, 2023 through October 14, 2024. One of their greatest fears would be to find asbestos behind one of the walls during the construction. Financial Summary Update - Victoria Carpenter, Finance Director was brief with her budget report and Summary Update — the net balance as of May 31, 2023 are of the key 4 airport funds. Fund 405 — FY 22-23—$8,002,852 compare to $2,430,030 FY 21/22 Fund 410 — FY 22-23 — 4,884,867 compare to 4,247,781 FY 21/22 Fund 415 - FY 22-23 - 50,805,746 compare to 41,069,398 FY 21/22 Fund 416 — FY 22- 23—3,824,100 revenue compare to 14, 515,035 actual 21/22 — this fund for capital projects will net at zero once all of the grants are depleted before their expiration dates. Executive Director Report — Harry Barrett enclosed the Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Update in our meeting packet. Topics were as follows: Airport Master Plan —This is a 30 month plan to create a master plan valid through year 2045. The consultant has produced a draft working papers for the inventory of Existing Conditions and Aeronautical forecast. Next meeting is July 26tn Restroom Renovations — Solicitations for bids are closed for 5 public restrooms. Terminal Common Use —This is to install Common Use Passenger Processing System (CUPPS) at 18 boarding gates which can be used by any airline. It will provide greater flexibility overall. The Regional Jet Concourse has been partially converted to date. Outbound Baggage Handling System - City Council approved the selection of AECOM for inbound baggage handling . Staff is working with TSA to execute design in conjunction with the FAA. Baggage Claim and Renovation — Grant was received this week for $5 million. Already submitted to City of PS. Public Parking Electrification — Lot D — Staff applied for Southern CA Edison electric vehicle charging infrastructure rebate program. Employee and Economy Parking Lots — The RFQ for design services is now with City of PS awaiting to confirm and negotiate pricing. Taxiway W and Al Rehabilitation — in design. Scheduled for 2024. Sterile Shade Structures— In design. Spaces identified and structures are being procured for installation in three areas. . • . Report of Council Actions — None Future Committees — New commissioners are to consider joining one committee. Openings will be emailed to them later this week. Commissioners Requests and Reports — None Report of Council Actions - None Next Airport Commission meeting will be a regular meeting on September 20, 2023 at 5:30 pm. No meeting scheduled for August. .•I POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting August 1, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting August l,2023 CLOSED SESSION IN PROGRESS AIA Pledge of Allegiance ,09 --k7qm 0 CALIFORMA pr 8/2/2023 City Council Meeting August 1, 2023 S1 — Discuss Revisions to the Pillars of the Community, Distinguished Artists, and Athletes Awards Programs Pillars of the Community/ Distinguished Artists & Athletes • Residents who have made positive impacts in the City • Volunteers • Nonprofit organizations • Service clubs • Active in community Nomination Criteria • La Quinta resident at least three years • Significantly contributed to the community of La Quinta • Previous local, state, or national recognition • Signatures from ten residents (Not required for Pillars Award) Awards Program Revamp • Subcommittee formed June, 2022 • Survey distributed to former Pillars recipients December, 2022 • Councilmember Fitzpatrick appointed to serve on the Subcommittee February, 2023 • Subcommittee met to assess recognition programs April, 2023 Subcommittee Recommendations • Separate Pillars of the Community from Senior Inspiration Award • Junior/Youth Achievement Award • Community Services Award • Eliminate Artists/Athletes Awards to create a Distinguished Citizen Award • Develop system of recognition culminating in the Pillars of the Community achievement Subcommittee Recommendations • Enhance and rebrand promotional efforts for all recognition programs • Create network to champion and nominate individuals deserving of recognition • Acknowledge awards recipients at City Picnic/The Gem CALIFORNIA - City Council Meeting August 1, 2023 S2 — Marketing Strategies and Media Plan 2023/24 August 1, 2023 13 iMA 14 Marketing Strategies & Media Plan 2023/24 vCCU QWuKra Purpose To continue to create and engage a marketing plan/strategy that centers around the residents and businesses of La Quinta while still attracting visitors to the Gem of the Desert. 7 August 1, 2023 WEBSITE ANALYTI CS 15 LaQuintaCA.Gov New/Unique Views Up: S% (242 K Views) Session Duration Up: 2 minutes per session IMOON f•— 1. 61% Noteworthy Info: Canadian Users Up 82.S% 16 .I August 1, 2023 Playl n LaQu i nta.Com New/Unique Views Up: 3% (289 K) Session Duration Down: 41 seconds Bounce Pate . 75% 17 DIGITAL ANALYTICS 18 CO a August 1, 2023 'ZQ FY 22/23 AT A G LA N C E BIG WINS WHAT'S WORKING • Gains in overall site traffic • Quality Traffic From Meta 19 • Paid Search Champs TOP PERFORMING Organic Top Metros • Los Angeles • Palm Springs • San Francisco • Seattle • San Diego Opportunities • Video First Revolution! Google SEM 60.717 Clicks (3f Top Ad Groups. May Top Keywords:g. 8 TR 1. Calendar Events Palm Springs Benchmark: 94 2, Things to do in PaIrr Springs 4.68% 3. La Quinta CaLifarnia b3-3-888 impressions NIV4 10 August 1, 2023 Google SEM "Near Me" 8,319 CLicks Cf Top Ad Groups: Play zRh 12.11 CTR Top Keywords: 44 1, Things to do in La Quinta Benchmark: 2. La Quinta Caffornia 4.68% zM 3- Things to do near me 315,400 Impressions 4 �GL 21 Meta Prospecting p . p 4.547,918 I mpressions Top Performing Adq: i. World renowned art events 102.612 Clicks 2.300 sunny days 2.25% CTR Benchmark: 1.00% ik 22 11 August 1, 2023 Meta Remarketing Ina 1.752,769 Impressions Tap Performing Ads. 1. Chris - Gems Video. 75,883 Clicks 2. Bryan - Gems Video 4- 2% CTR Benchmark: 1.00% .CQ 23 Goog le Video CP 2.422,175 Views Cf Top Ad Group: Gems Videos 58% View Rate � Top Videos: Benchmark: 30% 1. Bryan 2. Heidi 3, Chris L14i4,138, 053 Impressions 24 12 August 1, 2023 %4!40 Mobile Fuse 15-309 Clicks c3f lk* it. -A Igh 2,507.196 Impressions LW 25 6 F r--h • 1O.W IQDDD I%DDD 1 ION 0 Engager I ren s: 25,307 Expandable Engagement Rate 52-75% Benchmark: 5% Social Media � In srapram Icach 6 = Pa,e mach � 108,325 ' 0 DIIIY " 4latlsr 21 Jd 30 Aug D O-r 19 71rn' W NC 5 Feb SB M.r 7 7 Aor 5 Ju- nsig hts Instagram Followers: Grown by11% Faceboo k Followers: Grown by 100% IN 13 August 1, 2023 Fisca I Year 2023/24 Yy...0 Marketing Strategies Area of Focus rR . y f T Community Economic Tourism Outreach Development 0.1 14 August 1, 2023 ►�1 Where to Next? Dedicated Economic )evelopment Effo its Questions v4 15 CALIFOKNIA 'f Y� lift& s ram, City Council Meeting August 1, 2023 S3 - Imperial Irrigation District Energy Study Discussion h AS ..P= Background • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) has a 99-year agreement to provide electrical service to the Eastern Coachella Valley (CV) that expires in 2033. • The Coachella Valley makes up over 60% of IID's energy customers but has no voting representation on IID's board. • Riverside County and Imperial County Local Agency Formation Commissions' (LAFCOs) Draft Study outlines options for future governance. • Deadline for draft study written comments - August 30, 2023. Stakeholders' Options Dopudja & Wells Consulting outlined these two options with multiple variations: • IID continues to provide electrical service to the Eastern Coachella Valley along with voting rights on existing board or create a new sub -board; or • IID transitions electrical service to the CV, and the stakeholders invite another entity to assume responsibility as area's power provider. Fiscal Analysis • Draft Study does not include a cost analysis or recommendation for most cost-effective scenario. • IID did not have financials completed in time to be included in Draft Study. • $500,000 grant agreement requires the Study to include cost analysis of each option. Aging Infrastructure Stakeholders should also consider: • Current IID infrastructure was not designed to handle the growth that has occurred in the CV. • Customers are using more electricity, which is straining the grid and impacting future growth. • Funding upgrades will include an impending rate increase to customers. C ALIFQRNLA City Council Meeting August 1, 2023 PH 1 - Public Nuisance Abatement on Tax Roll tj v August 1, 2023 39 Assessor Parcel Name Number Cost of Abatement Administrative Fee Total ■ or BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 773-075-003 $2,500.00 $625.00 $3,125.00 BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 764-240-021 $2,800.00 $700.00 $3,500.00 $800.00 CADO LA QUINTA 764-460-043 $640.00 $160.00 Paid on 7131123 CHRISTINE F CLARKE / STEPHEN C COLLETT / STEVEN POPELAR 600-340-047 $3,243.00 $810.75 $4,053.75 CHRISTINE F CLARKE / STEPHEN C COLLETT / STEVEN POPELAR 600-340-046 $3,702.00 $925.50 $4,627.50 HAGLUND W T / HAGLUND RUBY A 773-131-017 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 KENNETH D SMITH 773-163-015 $250.00 $62.50 $312.50 SIENNA CORP 600-052-009 $300.00 $75.00 $375.00 STAMKO DEV CO 600-340-029 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 STAMKO DEV CO 600-340-029 $3,243.00 $810.75 $4,053.75 20 - CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting August 1, 2023 PH2 — La Quinta Village Apartment Project EA2022-0001, GPA2022-0002, SP2022-00017 & SDP2022-0001 4 Proposal • La Quinta Village Apartments project — 252 units, 178 market rate and 74 moderate income — Includes clubhouse and various recreational amenities Project Location 7:7w A 7A i4f IT Na GIs 111T- P61 - - - W". Oz 2I&.� dF IMM Existing Zoning: Medium High Density Zone Background • Previously approved under La Paloma Site project — 208 unit senior community with independent living, assisted living, and memory care units • Specific Plan for La Paloma currently exists Background • Identified in 2013-2021 Housing Element on the inventory of sites for affordable housing • 2022-2029 Housing Cycle • Site identified on site inventory for 280 low/very low income housing units • Designated as Affordable Housing Overlay Applications • Mitigated Negative Declaration finding no significant effects on environment with mitigation incorporated • General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Site Development Permit General Plan Amendment • Site identified on City's inventory in Housing Element for 280 very low- to low-income units • City must maintain adequate sites to accommodate its remaining unmet RHNA by income category • If City approves a development identified on its Housing Element with fewer units than identified in Housing Element, the development applicant must identify an additional site to accommodate (SB330- No Net Loss) General Plan Amendment • The Project includes 178 market rate units and 74 moderate -income units that would count towards RHNA • Applicant has identified an additional site to accommodate 280 very low- to low-income units — 12.74-acre commercial parcel at NE Corner Washington and Fred Waring — Affordable Housing and Mixed -Use Overlays August 1, 2023 51 52 26 Specific Plan Amendment • Project requires an amendment of the existing La Paloma Specific Plan • Amended Specific Plan would supersede La Paloma and detail the development standards for La Quinta Village Apartments Specific Plan differences from Municipal Code Site Development Permit • Site, architectural and landscape design • 11 buildings in project — 7.5 are two story — 3.5 are three story • Two story are 28'-6", three story are 38'-6" Aurru6 401 r i I Unit Breakdown • 252 Unit breakdown: - Market Rate Units = 178 116 one -bedroom • 62 two -bedroom - Moderate Income Units = 74 50 one -bedroom 24 two -bedroom Density Bonus • State law allows for increased number of units if a project includes affordable housing • Project proposes 50% bonus resulting in 74 moderate income units mo IN 1! rill LEI ,I ■ MR I pp- August 1, 2023 View on Washington Street View on Avenue 50► 65 ------------ 66 T I 33 Traffic • Traffic Analysis included 5 intersections: — Washington Street and Avenue 50 — Washington Street and Sagebrush Avenue — Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive — Washington Street and Avenue 48 — Moon River Drive/Park Avenue and Avenue 50 • All projected to operate at acceptable levels of service, except Moon River — Already operates at a deficiency due to morning school traffic Traffic • Roadway segments analyzed: — Washington Street, north of Avenue 50 — Washington Street, south of Avenue 50 — Avenue 50, west of Washington Street — Avenue 50, east of Washington Street • All projected to operate at 52% capacity or more with the project and projected growth — Within General Plan buildout Traffic • Access off Washington and Avenue 50, with right in/right out for both • Project will add sidewalks, bike/golf cart lanes on Avenue 50 and Washington Street, extend median Parking • Provides 520 parking spaces, 396 covered • Parking ratios per Density Bonus law — 1 space per one -bedroom (166) — 1.5 space per two -bedroom (129) — Total 295 spaces CEQA • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared • Department determined project would have less than significant effects, with mitigation • City received (11) comments during public review period — Traffic, biological, cultural resources comments —Mitigation measures address these • Project has the following conditions: — HCD must approve amended Housing Element prior to construction permits being issued — Deed restricted covenant for 55 years for moderate income units — Power poles on the property under 92 kV must be undergrounded City Council Meeting August 1, 2023 D7 - Cactus Flower Activities Promenade Cactus Flower Activities Promenade Background • 2400 square foot u n util ized paved space • Located at end of Buttercup Lane in Cactus Flower Development between two retention basins • Opportunity to provide amenities to the community August 1, 2023 rM 7s 39 Proposed Amenities Or- rw , ti x 'Tti• "Y " 4 Proposed Amenities P.. _ August 1, 2023 81 82 41 the Cyr! r.l is 7riAia .. ef.4.rq aam m�n,ly uspyl an �pgto-dwg Ilw -rmmnn nma In i!u Una I� Pdwwr I� n--q ahQt ad IIIf —nnrn—ly gee_ Ih■ -^—P- Flo— h[I Irll He P—.d, —.1d p. ,&. G I,..6I F.,k •h,l cpn�ir Wr Il�o rsmmvitlll !a r4of.orwaial�o-c I hal cowJ'ncLca I,,b p.c41.6511 —,I.. nrnaall. a have Slnme. 4M13 p+ry pnrR. �.Ih µahnq ena chomp i7wnao�l• Soon I-0e QiJ Caae Pa tcg.n the —mp fploncinnAci is ram.. n �.- Postcard - Ir- -fin GLA I CACTUS FLOWER ACTIVITIES PROMENADE tha CIFy of !Y 8o-inro I....k Ina ...—Hy C.p.} OA bpp+arhl 10 ar■ate o-n eatlrll I.■ Ora�enod■ In hho- C' r.• Flux.+ -i'HIA arhsgd. Survey Results Estimated Construction Cost • Two (2) pickleball courts* ($35,000 each) : $70,000 • *including surfacing, nets, fencing and general construction costs • Two (2) table tennis ($13,500 each): $27,000 • One (1) foosball table ($15,000 each): $15,000 • One (1) cornhole set ($3,500 each): $ 3,500 • Adjustment of two (2) catch basin covers ($2,500 each): $ 5,000 Estimated Construction Total: $120,500 Proposed Budget Professional: Design: I nspection/Testing/Su Construction: Contingency: Total Budget: Cactus Flower ivities Promenade i $ 10,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 r $ , Zo,Soo $ 15,500 $170,000 Considerations • Parking —available on -street • Seating — benches to be included • Shade — Trees included with landscaping • Public Safety Cameras — not currently proposed • Lighting — not currently proposed • Provide your own bags and balls for games Proposed Timeline • Include as Additive Alternate for construction with Cactus Flower Landscape Improvements Project • Council Bid Authorization • Bid Period • Council Considers ProjectAward • Execute Contract and Mobilize • Construction (70 Working Days) • Accept Improvements August 1, 2023 August 2 to September 12, 2023 October 3, 2023 October 4 to October 30, 2023 October 2023 to February 2024 February 2024 QUESTIONS? OKI.-Mm WNW be -ALIFORNIA pr A Public Hearing Item No. 2 La Quinta Village Apartments Presentation by Applicant: Irwin Partners Architects k 7, • ■ VRwfi •1i1liip7:■ U ■ r■ F�� tl•.. ax.r�kllt' � Ella ■ _ 111 lilt ....s ¢ .i 4i ■ lai r r!A L�# FEW MR- lar Yil ra IV] pp- ills ON tllfrj� hr �� ��: �■ iui„'fnr kxMy�Ll� GENERAL PLAN - LAND USE DESIGNATION 8/2/2023 PEEWERTM OIbT+IICT rta hy.s m+r n.�ar lu lal �n nu+nY - NM�IIIIA brlM1 gHiM� �+»�-� 4NE Land Use: Medium High �a Density Residential ra de- (RMH) CrTi.w _PW IXR�IYiRIF am 5O Wp� nxwrtlY e�eelu jIMPCNE �� M Ia+iYM Ni RWnWM �o[orour ern ar,epL! Overlay District: Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) 3 Complies with RMH Zoning NO Zone Change ' . NNW i«,I a . L at ♦ I �� �GC �NC d5 ' PR �RC RR �I RL Tablc kl-48 i� nat Vacant hand Inver mmq RMH Z o n i n g : ""P ARa Acre€ €=isU�gGo �nlni R.ofened aeoJa�Wq Residential M 20 Oe""Y Yk4d Medium High W4r9 Low. Low and hece.. ba InTornp 911 . GF—IL 14.03 MHOR k } 21 °Ilo Project Site is slated for 280 Very -Low to Low-income Units by the City of La Quinta 4 2 8/2/2023 zoning � OG IrN tr mot �C7 �FP �Cc i• NC r -us �PR �RC uH lu RJK _ RMH aow 5 Proposed Site r — ..,. MLL 's AVF 91 lOS 1 0 � ��IrirwT a i i L3 fit♦ YFTWIS` I Zoning: Residential Medium High i Project Site( 1 ` oe Proposing to reallocate 280 Very -Low to Low- income units closer to Highway 111 Corridor AHO DISTRICTACCOMMODATING CITY'S HOUSING NEEDS INCREASING AND ENHANCINGREGIONAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES Development Standards o Density: MINIMUM 20 units per acre = 281 Units Maximum 36 units per acre = 505 Units o Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 22 Feet' (28' w/MUP) o Maximum Structure Height: 40 Feet o Maximum Number of Stories: 4 Stories o Minimum Livable Area: 600 SF o By -Right Parking Incentive applies: 1 space per 1-Bed, 1.5 spaces per 2-Bed o No parking allowed in 15 Foot rear setback nor in 10 Foot exterior side yard setback o If approved by City, allows for retention basins within landscape setbacks o Carport Setback: 20 Feet LQMC 9.110.100: Allows rental multifamily residential units By -Right for developments with at least 20% of units affordable to low, very low, and extremely low-income households at a density of at least 20 units per acre and at least 16 units per site. AUGUST 2023 I LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS R 3 8/2/2023 CITY ZONING ORDINANCE - RMH Development Standards o Density: 8-12 units per acre = 168 Units o Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 22 Feet' (28' w/MUP) o Maximum Structure Height: 28 Feet o Maximum Number of Stories: 2 Stories o Minimum Livable Area: 750 SF o Parking: 2 spaces per unit, 0.5 guest spaces per unit o No parking allowed in 15 Foot rear setback nor in 10 Foot exterior side yard setback o If approved by City, allows for retention basins within landscape setbacks o Carport Setback: 20 Feet General Notes: 1. Any proposed building height over 22 feet requires Minor Use Permit and shall not exceed the maximum building height of the existing zoning. For RMH, the maximum building height is 28 feet. AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 7 7 LA QUINTA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN Development Standards o Density: 12 units per acre = 168 base units o Density Bonus: 50% (additional 6 units per acre) = 252 total units o Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 28 Feet o Maximum Structure Height: 40 Feet o Maximum Number of Stories: 3 Stories o Minimum Livable Area: 670 SF o By -Right Parking Incentive applies: 1 space per 1-Bed, 1.5 spaces per 2-Bed o Allows for parking within setbacks including rear and exterior side yard setbacks o Allows for fencing and retention basin within landscape setbacks o Allows carports within 15-foot rear building setback AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 8 8 M 8/2/2023 COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards RMH Zoning I Proposed AHO Density 168 Units 252 Units 281-505 Units 40 Feet 40 Feet Maximum Structure Height 28 Feet Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 22 Feet 28 Feet 22 Feet Maximum Number of Stories 2 Stories 3 Stories 4 Stories Minimum Livable Area 750 SF 670 SF 600 SF Parking Totals 420 Spaces 522 Spaces 330-593 Spaces �J DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Reduction of livable area allowed by the City. Existing developments with units providing less than 750 SF of livable area: o W01ff Waters Place:l Bedroom — a" cc o Seasons at La Quinta:1 Bedroom — 609 SF o Seasons at Miraflores:1 Bedroom — 700 SF o Silverhawk Apartments:1 Bedroom'The Falls" — 670 SF 1 Bedroom "Aqua Rose" —743 SF o Hadley Villas:1 Bedroom — 540 SF Average 10 Wolff Waters Place Proposed La Quinta Village Apts 1 Bedroom Floor Plan 1 Bedroom Floor Plan 633 SF 673 SF 8/2/2023 Legend -I- , 3 = 3-Stories O 'xJ'?udus by Hltrs /y IaM1�M1¢ GT-TOYA1GL�mA[nl � 3 y �" ® = 4-Stories �. 6711 � • = S-Stories _ FYOilr�`rIM L�'IJOnm PFlZ13ECi 9iiE ' Enp.�r a 3bib . i �wrr_ 47Lnppp s La Daini S�Yr • :u�rr.or�i:. r,uv Iw•i.� ;.. ..r • • 2 • • • . 11 12 0 8/2/2023 IT .r. i11 ��4 f r I 178 Market -Rate Units 74 Moderate -Income Units 13 ry*. Nyl _.. M. 4 ~ 1 1 ARE THE OFF -SITE • 14 7 8/2/2023 I :) -- - --- - ---- Q, C> MM %mab-w- .-mow-- N I !NG 16 0 8/2/2023 17 iN p W M hlaa it • N 18 ❑= New Traffic Lane �= New Bike Lane �= Future Bike Lane ❑= Striping .^7 .• - oi� Y n - 1 .,.VJ rlti __tea f. r. 1B 7IE Additional Vehicle Lane and Bike Lane connecting Park Ave. and Washington St. a 8/2/2023 �= Proposed Bridge �= Raised Median �= Roadway 19 Future raised median to prohibit illegal left turns into Project I .. ' • � � l q � T 4 'r- WASHINGTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS 20 10 8/2/2023 21 New Deceleration Lane New Bus Turnout Relocated Bus Shelter Extended Existing Median --------- --- -- -- --==7=7777� ---------------- -------- --------------------------- -------------------------------------- CVASHINGTOW/L STIEET--7� qr A,ph "r PRaPoffo 6°' 60' 6�O 60' WD-SEMI I SECT[ I ------------------- ---- ---- -- 66' STR S�M FT OLD C/L MARS 24 --28 ao 24 WASHINGTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS Dedicated Deceleration Lane at Primary Entry Relocated Bus Stop w/ Dedicated Bus Turnout 22 11 i5 +� k 7, 00 i' ARCHITECTURAL STYLE y. I CONTEMPORARY MEDITERRANEAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WITH DESERT TONE COLOR SCHEMES 8/2/2023 E w 25 26 EF 13 13 06M"P! EMWlllrn Color Scheme 1 13 8/2/2023 27 HaLLuhi&4.'_ �- _=eOIN"" 28 Color Scheme 2 Co|orSchemo 3 14 8/2/2023 29 I --------------------------, I I I err , ire, L------------------------- � 30 --------------------------G. I I I I L------------------------- Intentional layout of garages along north property line and landscaping prevent looking into neighbor's yards 15 8/2/2023 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I ..,�.,,. I — ,,, `�x-..� 31 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I MR I r - � I L— — — — — — — — — — — — --- -----� 32 S� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I L-------------------------- Intentional layout of garages along north property line and landscaping prevent looking into neighbor's yards ---------------- ------------------ Intentional layout of garages along north property line and landscaping prevent looking into neighbor's yards 16 8/2/2023 PARKING Required without Affordable Ratios: • 2 Spaces per Unit • 0.5 Guest Spaces per Unit 252 units x 2 spaces/unit = 504 spaces for units 252 units x 0.5 Guest spaces/unit = 126 spaces for Guests 603 Total Spaces Required AUGUST 2023 33 Required with Affordable Ratios: • 1 Space per 1-Bedroom Unit • 1.5 Spaces per 2-Bedroom Unit • No guest spaces required 166 1-Bed units x 1 space/unit = 166 spaces 86 2-Bed units x 1.5 spaces/unit = 129 spaces 295 Spaces for Units Required 7 Spaces for Clubhouse 302 Total Spaces Required LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS Parking Provided Ratios: • 1 Space per 1-Bedroom Unit • 2 Spaces per 2-Bedroom Unit • 0.5 Guest Spaces per Unit 166 1-Bed units x 1 space/unit = 166 spaces 86 2-Bed units x 2 spaces/unit = 172 spaces 252 units x 0.5 spaces/unit = 126 spaces for Guests 338 Spaces for Units Provided 7 Spaces for Clubhouse 522 Total Spaces Provided Parking Pass System to regulate parking & visitors 33 OVERFLOW PARKING What if the Village holds special events for its residents? Where will Village residents and their guests park? Will they be parking in the Sagebrush neighborhood? Drafted Overflow Parking Management Plan to provide strategies to be implemented during special events & holidays Professional Valet Service to park vehicles on -site Off -site parking at Sports Complex and shuttle bus service AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 34 34 17 8/2/2023 35 TRAFFIC STUDY DURING PEAK SEASON APRIL 2023 New traffic study conducted April 2023. Previous study conducted during December 2020. Study Area Intersections Project Trip Generation Study Time Periods Washington / Avenue 50 1,556 Total Daily Trips Weekday AM Hours: 7:OOAM — 9:OOAM Washington /Sagebrush Ave. 108 AM Peak Hour Trips Weekday PM Hours: 4:OOPM — 6:OOPM Washington / Eisenhower Dr./Rancho La Quinta Drive 125 PM Peak Hour Trips Peak Hours for Analysis per City of LQ Washington / Avenue 48 Avenue 50 / Moon River Dr./Park Ave. Less than significant impact due to study area intersections operating at acceptable Level of Service (LOS) under Project Completion Conditions. Existing deficient operation conditions at Moon River Dr./Park Ave. and Avenue 50 due to AM student drop off for Harry S. Truman Elementary School. No improvements are required. AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 36 36 8/2/2023 !tff La_ -1 __ --_ - 1 L . --•fir , - 6: 37 G WILL SHORT-TERM RENTALS BE ALLOWED? Will units become Airbnbs? Will units sit empty the majority of the year? NO Leasing Term Commitment of One Year Minimum Providing local housing for growing full-time community Serving local businesses by reducing travel time from other desert communities AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 38 38 19 8/2/2023 WHAT IS AFFORDALE HOUSING? Community voiced concerns regarding affordable housing increasing crime in the area. AFFORDABLE L�L LOW-INCOME Different levels of Affordability Above Moderate -income (Market -Rate) Moderate -income Low-income Very Low-income Extremely Low-income Acutely Low-income *Based on Area Median Income (AMI) Definition: Area Median Income- midpoint of a region's income distribution. In a region, half of households earn more than the median and half earn less than the median. This is NOT the average income. souace_ Hryas-irwww. en ouiNr. cn_ 60 v EsIDENrsieo CAL RE$OUR c Sia FFoxaneee-HO Us" G1INco.we-emirs AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 39 39 WHO SETS AFFORDABLE RENT LIMITS? Who sets the guidelines? How much will the moderate -income rents be? Established by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Based on federal limits set by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) $OURCE NET— AGO B s,DENT:i,ocnL — OUR ­/AFFORDABLE-NONs,ND1,NCOmE-„m,rs AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 40 40 20 8/2/2023 COUNTY 2023 RENT LIMITS (MODERATE) LA QUIINTA HOUSING AUTHORITY Income levels based on Department of Housing and Community Development Income Limits dated June 6, 2023 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom Monthly Affordable Rent: $2,079 Monthly Affordable Rent: $2,339 1 Person Household 2 Person Household 3 Person Household Median Income: $66,150 Median Income: $75,600 Median Income: $85,050 Maximum Income: $79,400 Maximum Income: $90,700 Maximum Income: $102,050 Annual Income Limit for Moderate ranges from $79,400 - $149,700 Median Income for Moderate ranges from $66,150 - $124,750 *Based on Household Size* Definition: Annual Income- Gross income from all sources for all members of the household sou*cE. Hrros,nwww_,a au,Nraca uo �iHOMEis�owPue.............ri<e<sa AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 41 41 AFFORDABLE RENT EXAMPLE Income levels based on Department of Housing and Community Development Income Limits dated June 6, 2023 EXAMPLE The AMI for a 2-person household is $75,600. The maximum income to be eligible for moderate -income housing is $90,700. For rental tenants in a 2-person household, the maximum rent for moderate -income is $2,079 / month for a 1-Bedroom $2,339 / month for a 2-Bedroom Annual Income Limit for Moderate ranges from $79,400 - $149,700 Median Income for Moderate ranges from $66,150 - $124,750 *Based on Household Size* Definition: Annual Income- Gross income from all sources for all members of the household souxcE. rrrrvs:iiwww.,nouiNracn.co viwomriswowvua„swr000cuMrNriaeasa AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 42 42 21 MOON lit;I ! 4P L W& All units to receive high quality interior finishes, regardless if they are moderate -income or market -rate. Video rendering of La Quinta Village Apartments f,0 u" fi .. EXISTING LIGHTING AT SPORTS COMPLEX CONTRIBUTES TO LIGHT POLLUTION LZ! AUGUST 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 46 8/2/2023 Fop III - - ��1..1•ii'�I���� ]�..L_s�:'��-_ -- r.F _ _ f _ __•Y .Y� .�y.� _ •fr ------------- _" - — - =•�"mac-_ - ---"- •7m eN„ _ _ 47 Proposed: 58 Garages Building 4 is reduced to all 2-Story, previously half 2-story, half 3-story IWWI w-1mW- — --_... ^ �r • . •.fie{ - .��. - Alternate Option: Ni o garages _ �. -�•� 'I 'P I r�rr Uncovered parking and landscaping to replace proposed garages 48 24 8/2/2023 Proposed: 28 Feet within Image Corridor i 7 L �-rn. �r aw..■ 49 50 Alternate Option: 22 Feet within Image Corridor 25 8/2/2023 This slide intentionally left blank 51 52 26 Public Hearing Item No. 2 La Quinta Village Apartments Presentation by Traffic Consultant: Integrated Engineering Group 8/1/2023 Troutdale &WrEGKaT.[_ CNG N_CRING G�OUr Transportation Assessment 1. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 2. Traffic Impact Analysis 3. Active Transportation Technical Studies prepared consistent with City of La Quinta General Plan & Riverside County Guidelines 8/1/2023 VMT Exemption - Per City of La Quinta VMT Analysis Policy 5rma)f Projects This applies to projects with ipvo trip generation per exisring CEQA imemptlons or result In a 3,1100 Metrlc Tans of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2e) per year :creeping level threshold, based on the Riverside County Oimatc Actinri plan and South Coast Air Quality Management District's draft intarim guidance For assessing project -level greenhouse gas impacm. Single Family Housing projects less than or equal to 140 Dwelling tJnits (OU); or ■ Multi Farnily (low-rise) Ht9u5ing projects less than or equal to 200 DU; or multi family (mid -rise} Housing Projects less than or equal to 245 D[J; or General Office Bullding wlth area less khan ar equal to 160,000 SF; ur Retail bu1IdIngs wlti, area less tti4n or equal to 70,00C SF; or Local Serving Projects Projects that introduce local serving land uses are deterrnlned to shorten non - discretionary trips by putting goods and services closer to residents, resulting irl art overall reduction In VMT. These land uses Can be presumed to have a less than sign;frcant Impact, absent substantial evidence to the roYe"ry. Local serving land LISeS art ISte'd below. i�BEe +if hrtE rEE i� r9jC'E 5 iG'�s5 ,e^r ra�vovaquare feel� me Local serving cornmunfty colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the RTP/SCS Traffic Impact 1. Study was scoped and approved by the City 2. Study was prepared per the City of La Quinta & County of Riverside TIA Guidelines 3. Study was update per the Planning Commission request 8/1/2023 Project Description & Trip Generation PROJECT DESCRIPT ION The subject pro]art Ls proposing the construction of el¢ven �11j resldentlal bulAIngs Ind udIng one hundred sevemyeight (179) muitifamllyIlow-rise) units, 3eventy#our (74) affordable units and one (I� elubheum with amtnitles_ Aeeess to the prejaet site will be provided via two driveways along Washington Street and Avenue 50 re5pectiveIv. tall Ur Ir�i.n�ty LrnY� AM� Hour PMPeill Hour TWIV In OM Taal In CNI Totep MLIlrllamllY HkKiwB iLaw Rii-1 179 CILr t7 'r9 71 57 A 91 11iir) AF14rlaNv♦Ju wgtln(ow 74 OU l] 25 3T 20 T,i 34 isa Tarplr M 8a IM 77 Q f25 9,555 5 Study Area -Per City of La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #06-13 TABLE 2.0 — MInlmum Study Radius AET's between 1,pf� -6,gOp 0.50 mUe irom the Adjwent penmder of the project ADT`s between 5,001-10,000 1.0 mile from the adjacent Rerheter of tine project ADT's between 10,001-15.WD 1.5 miles from the adjacent perirneter of the project AOT's over 15,000 Radius to be determirtgtf by the City_ Study Area —Per County of Riverside County TIA Guidelines Establishing the 5tudly Area In general, the 0inirnurn area to he studied shall include any intenseclIon uf2 or mate "[nllect8V or higher €lassifi€atiol4 streets, at which the proposed pru}Ect will add 50 or more pears hour trips, not 11 8/1/2023 a 4 / A .aa �x..'F. �•��• A rsc:r �r�h .t'�' . blip okL .ITr1p`s:f -. rr. ,. i iAkt PNtl ti — i M�v 7 Results 1. Study area intersections operate at an acceptable LOS under all scenarios 2. 6-lane and 4-lane fronting Streets have current and Buildout excess capacities I C! 8/1/2023 Intersection Analysis Cu ulativs Candllfon InWe ctlan dneFdS-an AnaW& iMlalin� Cumu leti- Inrert-Oad {ondklon� Cw�klan� 1]1I1y{4j wt1bj 0*Iwy1e1 L05[b] 1 Wad ili iowi }m -rL and AverILW SO U WIG.) LM {5.d}17.1 uti W.hingrgn 57wur and iagcbntah Avunw 3.6E-0 4 AFA 5 7/4 d A.}A 3. Wasbi.ri— SirnnL and Ei.n6—. zfi.Ofla.a iSN 1i,5{}!.5 BfC ody.jm—hu L.O.ima adau A. Wiuhlnpun .WPRl and Av-nur48 ZIN12.9 f.,18 29.7/1.19 UB S. Mum %Hp De7re ParkAwmje and ISRN15.5 y9 ,1i5.ww FFE AhfrM1hc 50 r4yPc fQ7�r�a eq.*� v rxr aun.�yrmmda�iaj M rM xrirx,enxaeati n��row:e,erw.Mn.neir. •r wor�Pw� WdMonval[K eSMorrcl..� m w wvn awnw�exe fbLarrl. �.r.m.ed aHK�.h�dMlvuTrirAmNe+^ .nw�*rnary. n.1Orx�ad .d rh7 wxl 10 8/1/2023 General Plan Capacity Flexi41e aup[[L3t€on of LOS Level of Service should not be viewed as the sole determinant of acceptability. There is and will continue to be a need to provide flexibility in determining an acceptable level of service for a given roadway or Intersection. Although accepting a lower level of service (LOS E or even F) at certain intersections and segments during peak season may result in perlodic congestion, once familiar with network constralnts, travelers wl11 seek alternative paths and traffic will be distributed to those parts of the network with surplus capacity. Acceptable Levels-of-Servi€e (LOS) As directed by this General Plan, City of La Quanta Engineering Bulletin #a6-1 j, mandates that the City strive to maintain the mInlrnurn level of service for Its intersections at not worse than LOS D. At intersections along roadways contained in the Riverside County Congestion Management Program (CMP) 5ystern of Highways and Roadways, the minimum level of service required is to be not worse than LOS E. Within the City of La Quinta, Highway 1i1 is designated as a CMF facility. 11 General Plan - Classification Roadway ri .a... ., .._. ,e;■ S�ihrre of lvllurere —�` — Hkibw 'l11 �` 3IajnrArFlA.;gg5al • Y� 1 # m PT6p— Arlydnl I+U1 « • !WowJ•r+ Artio-Nn71li'1}l •sue Lo O&d%—.dnr j:Dj 4 .w cwlrewr (it 1T1 p(L101-h,u ArfM.rJSDI 12 RE 8/1/2023 13 Roadway Segment Analysis Cumu aRdadwaySegmont GapaEkyA.R.ttt Roadway Segment class caliah LOS E Capacity CumulatIve CorniAiani ADT v c ratio LOS Washington Street North Df Awenue 50 &Wne Major 61,000 34,490 0.565 A South of Avenue 50 Er Lane Major 61," 36,22$ 0 497 A Avenue 50 Wnstof Washington Street A-LanePrinwry 42,600 4,757 0.112 A East of Washington Street 3-L ne Arlmary' 31,! 50 9,923 0311 A 4-ZpnC ["irw 14 8/1/2023 15 Roadway Segment# 2035 Buildout —53 Peak Seas+•• R+,ydwny S¢E—t C Rp—t4Ar 4nn[iYtbna —r=-.cYel J•Iwr, Ilnurjura Meew.,.k.r�mnnt� _ .. .645J:nil {lOYiYMIL� LINT �T F14#dw# s+r� N' H 4t I Ci vx - LOS N'MIFAIn�w.+F7 - fvvl�i4ririr[Iw�ri�f,l 6 1 ryell�i it i. •�. i. i. o-7'v E PiW—AA U,4i .. •I r�+rr�l-Ir u.W ,.. I.n rtre ,�Ai .S'h'1�5�. iu+Y 41-w rIYIIY11,1{•{y Zl! �,R �n�_ •WP9r l5 f„�,rli, u_il•, ! �hRf�IR9r��P1�4l SII t �_ F it [t11.jRR M.— �Y ' mss s44S RPxrnay lh�L ±P� Ge�puG iY�6w } q�Ar{ILr ypL:INUa• Ju2—St M M7fa. St 16 go 8/1/2023 Bicycle Network — General Plan � Sy�ss I Lis�rk F�IYs � - * r 7Efrniir ln�an'hriiiir iws) �' n1 ka.J Trvh L.wn •.. i I..• fjj illn.L hki• ..i u■ imlk�n�dnR � � ■i■ 4pWvn[1eB.run F Isar - 1 t 1 1 _ 1 s • 4 i F F e j ' F � F I ` F I I[ 17 a 8/1/2023 Gate Vehicular Queue i:PEILIr 6 APPENDIXA—PARXINGC4� OIL SERVICE RATE Tw+colSmro- F%ilrs Par Lme hvl-p F TIhP+p w CeThFAI ��ii Tvor_or:,ontrol _ W JVnh7 _. - .yxwtki r, W EPAerInG. Ly' _ Ctvr asb,no oonlyd 9.6 4.000 Ihuu[ra +} Tu et Gsprnrrr np ael■ S.6 7m ai Y T1m9 c4mppwd 4nnd0b7o— 8.6 47,5 Z v84.ff-t�rG ales 6.9 M95 S +u the— Anrlrf U.pmtmenl Pr T—r•'Mt 1LADOTl Llrnn.. Pf Puli4L 4Fm9S vP.JMP61},tL J21 Pa"xB'por Gas metllodCiopr �Lammu:hc queue knM IKCeJTJrr ka—wum tretRe IMenklt'r h.Yed 4•S r.nd...nl. ,a I�q C"budu,F 7- R . O.M..p Ir aBitr—, wnh Transpan W on R.—h Soard paport lll 165 irrc rm.w Theory,th.mrer9 dtueurg rMnddr`.f-&c nkevore i+calrulered n the resin or perk lac ,r mi& r r-10 Lypnal.—i. nLC. P rho x4Y hRn JTINIkIHf riA d.pnnln�Spyld 9nrh4 �rl.gd.3..�l Prlll.+lnn Mle nPP4dto nn9�l4lledllMrk TRWPFCIWMNSRY IRYn1.]IRMMIY N}I-11TCN YM+d RneY Th. ta+•par.J ltVMplln�+gn 9hMl �QIa M�YO�a.d iLL HrJMr�MM JnpIZJ F.1 ufJ�dr.d ldp.4nn p.kY il.w nips �e.....a�ir.Rar k.nnn.di tirliwr.rr..r..,.wl. The e.ph[ MKt.ur rnlrvl qR of 23-h,tr pmh—jq!J0 wp b!Gee6 The,opa9•d AY~ 50 d.la b 4kpmAo 10 P-Mtb 20 AM and Fr PM wd d+w mypund mq.k k." Irie.. The hldw PE"Fn mr" rile at 54 YHdtles per hour 6VO wal he used. &..d w rh. LAD TWrne.r.nrpr.rad.4[.rd gprr.l.d4.r.prJGSyph..d— hlprr AMinllo4nd rrini r.1ea. the arpesigd Uelhc InMnimesarc0-i6. j2S/4g9h Far the usk,ph.nd 0 7] {SA{9pS� hx 1he kwnx 50 rhls IFL— h in Aft, to T—ke 9a Hl 3L—hpGr,—W,ng m J rvq—dsW,rpe cr 7.IkI.*. W k4h F"W 20 10 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 Public Hearing Item No. 2 Opposition: La Quinta Village Apartments From: Nancy Alexander <nancyalexanderconsulting@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 4:08 PM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Nancy Alexander Subject: WRITTEN COMMENTS - Nancy Alexander - LaQuinta - Proposed Apt Complex on 50th & Washington [Some people who received this message don't often get email from nancyalexanderconsulting@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear Ms. Flores and LaQuinta City Council Members, I want to share my concerns about the proposed apartment building complex on Washington & 50th. Below are a few of my concerns: -The size of the project doesn't fit into the long-term goal of making LaQuinta seem quaint and friendly. The proposed project is a monstrosity. Plus, the 3-story buildings would block the views as tourists are driving south on Washington. It seems that it will look similar to the apartment building built on Jefferson just south of Hwy 111. It'll be an eyesore. It would take away the small town feel and charm of LaQuinta. -Currently, there are many children that walk or bike to school or attend Boys and Girls Club activities. I'm concerned about the safety of those children not only because of traffic, but because of potential abuse towards the children. It only takes 1 bad resident to harm many children. Do you want that? -How will 500+ residents park in that small area? How will they accommodate guests? Where will they park? In our neighborhood or on the streets? -The developer said in the last meeting that rents will start at $2000 (that has probably increased). What low-income household can afford that type of rent? Will they need 4 or 5 people in an apartment to be able to pay their rent? -Traffic on Washington is already high and dangerous, especially at 50MPH. There are no turn lanes. How are tenants supposed to access the apartments? -High density areas bring crime. You have those statistics. -There is a lot on the north side of Hwy 111 near Fred Waring that would be a better location for this project. There are no views to interrupt and there is a lot of acreage that could accommodate this size of a project. I am strongly opposed to the project and hope you will vote against it. Kind regards, Nancy Alexander CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEA F ISM � MEETING DATE: Please give this completed form to the city Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. Thrs form is to assure accuracy in preparfng the minutes as to spelling of names and addresses, as well as to allow staff to follow-up on requests made by members of the Public. Completion of this form is voluntary. Dace submitted to the City Clerk, this forma becarnes a public record, Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.. L%A-�� A Subject: u`L 0 Support X Oppose Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for Possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMES,'IG 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMME'NtS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Councilmembers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: (D 8ov'4 A -U$40 7--1 70 t 1.U) e � t '1-R�4 Q R]�t l+�} t�T-V,� C) U-fr- $t C S. zri "' - I S 1-1--e- %%.; -% S' -P I.�- -c ► a ,� WCfS..�• CST- 5 � -1 Speaker Identification: N a mia O M4,.� Address I r C, G rl6 SI Organization/Business C- Phone ' �� ° -� � �-� S{ � � e-mail 61 YES, I wish to subscribe to the City`s "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetirgs events. Visit the City"s website for more information: wwwLaQuJrUCA-goy From: Nkaya Brandon <nkayabrandon@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 3:39 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Fwd: VOTE N0000000 on Washington and 50th project!!!!! [Some people who received this message don't often get email from nkayabrandon@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** > July 31,2023 > Dear La Quinta City Council, > Unfortunately, I will not be able to make it to your meeting on Aug 1 st as I have Covid currently. > ( First time... > However, I have been at all the planning commission meetings in person and have seen and heard about the revisions the developer came up with, so strongly feel compelled to write you an email today. > My husband and I live nearby 50th and Washington and drive that area daily. > We URGE YOU IN THE STRONGEST WAY POSSIBLE to NOT allow that project to go forward. > PLEASE VOTE NO!!!! > There are SO many reasons that I have already given and written in to the Planning Commission (as has most of the community) why this project, even with the revisions, is NOT a match for that small and VERY busy corner!!! > I am sure that you are well aware of them too. > The couple that I do want to bring up in this email come from the last planning meeting about the revision by the developer: > 1)ln our HOT desert climate, living many months in the 90's let alone the 100-120 degree heat - The developer is NOT putting in any ELEVATORS for the 2nd, let alone 3rd story apartments. > These buildings are not built realistically for the day to day health of people who live here in this climate! > It might work closer to the beach towns, but it does not work here. > In reality, who will/can climb up and down 3 flights of stairs with daily groceries, purchases, etc., day in and day out? > If young, people with children would be hauling their kids, strollers, diaper bags, etc, let alone groceries up 3 flights of stairs in most of the year's heat just to go in and out of their apartment. 1 > If older people look to move in, how would their health be in our desert heat most of the year climbing 2- 3 flights of stairs every time they go out? > My husband and I are 65 and 72 and very healthy and we wouldn't be able to do that in reality. > How would Emergency services safely get up and down in our super hot climate without any elevator access? > This was brought up in the last planning meeting and there were a lot of heads shaking including the commissioners. > It's just not realistic, practical nor healthy for anyone to be climbing 3 flights of stairs daily in the extreme heat of our desert climate, especially anywhere from May- Nov, let alone into the summer 110-120 temps. > How can you allow buildings of that height, in this desert climate to house people with NO elevators??? > 2) On the diagrams and what was discussed at the planning meetings, there were NO 2nd stairwells in the buildings. > What happens in a fire? > Or disaster? > Isn't there supposed to be a second egress for apartments on a 2nd, let alone 3rd story building? > How can that be up to code??? > 3) Please review the traffic study, in particular the newer one(s). > When they showed it on the screen at the last Planning Commission > meeting, I believe it showed it was done at 1A.M.( in the middle of the night!) That was not noted at the meeting and of course would explain why the project 'wouldn't have much effect on La Quinta traffic'. > 4) 1 believe the project only has a couple (I think it was 7 total) of parking spaces for guests for the 252 apartments! > What happens when more than 7 apartments have one car of guests over? > Let alone more than 1 car of guests ? > What happens when teenagers have a school friend over? Or a few who have their own cars? > What happens when more than 7 out of 252 apartments (with at least one occupant...) have a guest over? > Day to day life - there isn't any realistic room for the tenants to have any guests over - ever. > There is NO street parking on Washington nor 50th, nor is there to be any stopping and letting off of guests and kids on either very busy street. > Very unsafe!!! > The overflow from guest parking would be all over the neighboring developments which is definitely not good. > Even if the neighboring developments did get 'do not park here' signs up soon as the building were complete, as was brought up, it would cause a lot of disturbance. > And if the street signs worked there, there is no other area close by anywhere for guests to realistically park to visit the tenants of these buildings. > 5) The apartment homes in this plan are right next to the school playing field which has a multitude of massive stadium lights that are on during all the school practices and games until quite late. > These lights are extremely bright and tall and light up the area as if it were daylight. > These would reflect right into the windows and doors of the apartments. > How is living right next to, under these lights at night, a positive thing for the health of anyone? > This corner is a VITAL area in our stunningly beautiful city. > This view corridor acts as a 'gatekeeper area' that enchants and leads us into Old Town La Quinta. > It should be considered VERY seriously as to not only the safety of people traveling through the area with the inevitability of a multitude of U-turns to get into this proposed development, but also to the impact visually'as one of the front doors' into Old Town and the Cove areas. > The 2 and 3 story buildings heights are WAY too high for our area on a view corridor and next to one story developments. > It doesn't matter that the 3 story buildings are now placed more on the middle of the property, the height and the look that they developer has come up with would be a horrendous blight on our amazing landscape of mountains. > It would block them on one of the most travelled arteries of our city. > We travel this almost daily and live very close by. > IF the City MUST build something like this, PLEASE consider putting in more in the areas NORTH of 48th or North of 111 where there are more residential and commercial buildings that are similar 'shapes' and there is much more space to fit in a project like this. A place where the needs of the residences will be better taken into consideration - guest parking, space in design for elevators etc. > From Washington and 48th South - there are much more low rise residential developments that are well landscaped and congruent to La Quinta (whether Spanish Colonial or Modern in design). > Again, this is a Keystone property in La Quinta and is deserving of something that draws you in to La Quinta and makes you feel so glad you live here. > Not something that detracts from the beauty we have here and is so evident that it doesn't belong that it affects the property values of surrounding existing developments, deflates the citizens viewpoints of what our artistic City is about, and endangers their daily safety when driving to and from their homes. > There will be a project that will work for that area. > PLEASE VOTE NO on this one!!!!!!! > PLEASE hold out for one that will make you proud of your legacy having worked on behalf of our wonderful City of La Quinta. > Thank you. > Best to all, > Carolyn Brandon & Charles Ciup > 50240 Woodmere > La Quinta, > Ca 92253 > The Estancias > nkayabrandon@yahoo.com From: OP Gary Bullers <GBullers@ldry.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 4:06 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: project 50th and Washington Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from gbullers@ldry.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. As a 26 year resident at Parc Laquinta I want to express my resentment to the city that we are seriously considering a project of this magnitude on this corner. This will have serious deterioration in our emergency response rates from our city. This project is far to dense for this location. Please reconsider. Emergency response, and increased traffic, not to mention the strain on the current electric grid are all reason enough not to move forward with this project. But then you look at that plans... you see the lack of parking.. and it is clear to see the spill over will result in guest parking coming all the way up to the gates at Parc La Quinta. This is a bad plan and needs to be stopped please. Thank you for consideration Gary Bullers 78735 Maracas ct La Quinta, CA 92253 Parc La Quinta Resident 26 years Cell 760-409-4046 Gbullers@ldry.com i From: Alena Callimanis <acallimanis@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 3:29 AM To: Linda Evans; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Steve Sanchez; Deborah McGarrey Cc: Monika Radeva; City Clerk Mail Subject: Comments regarding La Quinta Village Apartments Good day Mayor Evans, Mayor Pro Team Sanchez, Council Members and Staff. I am sorry I am out of town and unable to join your City Council meeting in person. I wanted to provide some comments about the La Quinta Village Apartments. There is no question we need more rental apartments in La Quinta. But because of the proposed density, I believe there are a number of key concerns that are not addressed with the current proposal. 1) The u-turns proposed on such a high traffic corridor will cause significantly more traffic and safety issues. If I look at the many streets where there are right turn only exits out of a development followed by a u-turn to go in the opposite direction, these areas are not by a high traffic corridor like Washington and 50th. For example, there are a number of these on Madison. There are some on 52. But the traffic in those areas are not of the same volume, so it is easy to execute these maneuvers. The turns may be out of shopping centers where there are wide, three lanes and one or two turning lanes to execute a u turn. They are also not next to schools and a Boys and Girls Club which generates more pedestrian and bicycle traffic as well as car traffic. 2) There is no way you can allocate only one parking spot for a one bedroom apartment. Yes it might be code, but we are not in a major metropolitan area where you could get away with one car. Two people sharing a one bedroom apartment must have two parking spots. How do they even expect to be able to rent a one bedroom without having two spots. It would be a show stopper for most couples. And there is NO available street parking. Parents have already been told that when they come to the schools they cannot park on 50th. 3) Maybe when code was developed that you only need an elevator for a four story building, the people developing the rule did not live in the desert. I cannot imagine people climbing two or three stories to get to their apartments (carrying groceries, children, etc.) in the heat of our summers. There is code and then there is reality. 4) The staff has said there has been no pedestrian or bicycle count in the area. School starts up in a few weeks. Can we continue the meeting where we can get a real number of cars, pedestrians and bicyclists so we can make true decisions on safety? 5) 1 still feel three stories is too high for this area. The developer's video shows the proposed development with no simulation to include the fact that there are houses and schools right there. It makes me want to put a sign on Jefferson and 111 that says this apartment development is in Indio and not La Quinta! Thanks for your consideration of my issues. I know it will be a long, difficult meeting and thank you for your dedication to our wonderful City. Alena Alena Callimanis 81469 Rustic Canyon Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253 919 606-6164 From: Angela H M Carlson <amcarlson2@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2023 4:00 PM To: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Written Comments: Angela and Tim Carlson, 78775 Grand Traverse Ave, La Quinta Fairways, RE: La Quinta Village Apartments You don't often get email from amcarlson2@comcast.net. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. We moved from the Chicago area to La Quinta Fairways in March, 2020, and now live in La Quinta year round. We would like to comment on the proposed development at Avenue 50 & Washington. To begin, our largest and most pressing concern is the traffic congestion caused by the ingress/egress from the development itself. Perhaps in another area it would be a benefit to a right turn only into, and out of the development. However, this is a highly traveled area with a 50 MPH speed limit. The cars turning into traffic north on Washington from the development will take at least several seconds to get up to speed and those already at speed will have to change lanes or suddenly slowdown to try to avoid the slower vehicles. Add to that dangerous situation illegal U-turns (southbound to northbound) on Washington and Ave 50, the additional of a new bike lane as well as pedestrians crossing and this will result in many traffic problems and future accidents. Second, following the above concerns is the additional drop off and pick up traffic caused by the children at the two schools as well as the Boys and Girls Club at Avenue 50 and Park. If children are our future, how do you plan on protecting them during the snow bird and festival season from the additional at least 1500 trips per day? Third, with only right turn access out of the development, how do you propose the residents to get to Ralph's and CVS at Jefferson and Avenue 50? While we would all like to believe that they will follow the law and drive to Ave 48 in order to make a right turn to make their way to Jefferson, it is a fool's folly to believe that is actually going to happen. There will illegal left turn made onto Avenue 50 in order to save time. This is yet another thing the Sheriff's office will have to handle. 1 Speaking of The Sheriff's Office and Law Enforcement in this area, we have not heard their opinions on and recommendations for this development. Also, what about Fire and EMS? What about the school district? Is there enough capacity in the current staffing/equipment environment to handle these new residents and vehicles while maintaining at least the existing service to current residents? At the last Planning Commission meeting the architect stated that the residents and on site employees would be self policing to ensure the parking would be for just residents and visiting guests. However, there were no more that 15 guest spots for a development of 252 apartments. Where are those guests to park when the existing spots are taken? They will likely park in the established neighborhood north of the development or along a street nearby. We believe this to be not only unsafe with regards to traffic, but also safety of the current residents nearby. Lastly, LaQuinta is know for its beautiful 360 degree views. Mountain and beautiful sky everywhere. The City and City Council have protected those views and skies since its inception. No where in LaQuinta is there a three story building. Why now? Why here? We know that the lots on Avenue 50 and Washington will be developed. This is NOT the development for that corner. Is there nothing that can remain no more that two stories to preserve the integrity of our city? We decided to move to the Coachella Valley after numerous visits and stays in the area. We especially loved LaQuinta. With its wide roads, beautiful views and easy access to everything in the valley we truly believe it is the Gem of the Desert. Approval of this development will begin the process of chipping away at that Gem and turning it into another run of the mill city. We don't want that and don't believe the City Council does either. Please follow the opinion and vote of the Planning Commission and vote NO on this development. Respectfully, Angela & Tim Carlson ra From: Duna La Quinta Board of Directors <dunahoa@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2023 12:28 PM To: Linda Evans; Steve Sanchez; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Deborah McGarrey; City Clerk Mail Cc: Cheri Flores; Tania Flores; Steven Gardner; d cox; David Schuknecht; PAT & JANICE MC COY, TRUSTEES; THOMAS GUNN & RUTHIE MARLENEE; Lawrence Van Pelt; Ron Beeler Subject: Re: Written Comments by Duna La Quinta HOA Regarding the La Quinta Village Revised Site Plan Submittal Attachments: Letter to City Council RE La Quinta Village 7.30.pdf Some people who received this message don't often get email from dunahoa@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Mayor Evans and members of the La Quinta City Council, Please find the attached letter from the Duna La Quinta Homeowners Association regarding the proposed La Quinta Village Apartments, which is the subject of this coming Tuesday's Public Hearing. Keith Meyer President On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:45 AM Ron Beeler <ronbeeler@fpps.us> wrote: Dear Ms Flores and members of the City Council of La Quinta We understand the complexities of balancing the needs of developers and the community and appreciate your efforts to ensure that the interest of both parties is considered. However, we feel that the Village Apartment project will have a negative impact on our community, particularly with regards to traffic congestion and the lack of infrastructure. We hope that you will take our concerns into consideration as you continue to make decisions that affect the future of La Quinta. I have attached a letter from Keith G Meyer, President of the Duna La Quinta, Duna 1 HOA and a letter from Duna Gardens HOA in my name. Thank you for your service to our community. From: Duna La Quinta Board of Directors <dunahoa@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 10:45 AM To: clflores@laquintaca.gov; TFlores@laquintaca.gov Cc: levans@laquintaca.gov; ssanchez@lag uintaca.gov; kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov; ipena@laquintaca.gov; dmcgarrey@laquintaca.gov; Steven Gardner <lstevengardner@gmail.com>; d cox <LUCCAITALY@me.com>; David Schuknecht <david@ppminternet.com>; PAT & JANICE MC COY, TRUSTEES <sausageman4466@yahoo.com>; THOMAS GUNN & RUTHIE MARLENEE <SURFDOG323@gmail.com>; Lawrence Van Pelt <vanpelt lawrence@yahoo.com>; Ron Beeler <ronbeeler@fpps.us> Subject: Written Comments by Duna La Quinta HOA Regarding the La Quinta Village Revised Site Plan Submittal Dear Ms. Flores and Members of the City Council, please find our comments on the subject document attached. Many thanks for your hard work making La Quinta an amazing place to live! Keith Meyer President DUNA LA QUINTA HOA NO. 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS DUNA %(Ji<, Nt(k Homeowners Association No. 1 dunahoa@gmail.com July 30, 2023 Hon. Linda Evans and Members of the La Quinta City Council 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Review of La Quinta Village (formerly Troutdale Village) Site Plan General Plan Amendment to revise the City's Housing Element Specific Plan Amendment to amend the existing La Paloma Specific Plan Site Development Permit APN 646-070-016 Dear Mayor Evans and Members of the City Council; I am the President of Board of Directors for Duna La Quinta HOA No. 1, which is located on the south side of Avenue 50 between Washington Street and Eisenhower Blvd. Duna La Quinta is a medium -high density development and includes three HOAs, totaling 184 single family and condominium units. The Duna La Quinta Homeowners Association is greatly opposed to the La Quinta Village Apartment project as designed, due to project's location, poor site access from Washington Street and Avenue 50, turning traffic and safety impacts, the proposed increase in allowable building height from 22 ft. to 40 ft., and the significant impact to the views along Avenue 50. We urge the La Quinta City Council to reject the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Site Development Permit, General Plan Amendment, and Specific Plan for the La Quinta Village. Our association has reviewed the environmental document, supporting reports and revised site plan for the proposed project and has the following comments on the developer's proposal: 1. ACCESS This site is not a good location for such a large housing project that generates 1,600 trips per day and the access points are too close to the Washington/501" intersection. How does a resident get into this development coming from the north? They can't make a left turn into the development from Washington and they can't make a left turn in from westbound Avenue 50. So, it means that 100% of traffic coming from southbound would need to make a U-turn at Avenue 50, however, this is not possible since U-turns are prohibited in the southbound direction. This lack of adequate access will create great driver frustration and encourage unsafe movements. The Traffic Report estimates that 60% of the traffic would go to/come from Washington Street north. Since no access is available to southbound Washington traffic, all this traffic (50 vph in the PM) would need to divert to either Eisenhower Blvd. or to Jefferson Street. Page 1 of 5 DILINAy. 1i1 C_Homeowners Association No. 1 dunahoa@gmail.com This unavailability of access from the north invalidates one of the main assumptions of the traffic report, thus rendering the traffic report and environmental document inaccurate. It should also be noted that the traffic report does not consider pedestrian safety or signal activations at any study intersection. 2. BUILDING HEIGHT Avenue 50 is a city -designated "Image Corridor", with a maximum allowable height of 22'-0" (LQMC 9.50.020). The developer proposes to increase the allowable height to 28'- 0" within the Image Corridor width, and up to 40'-0" outside the corridor in order to accommodate four 3-story buildings. Changing the La Quinta Municipal Code to increase building height from 22 ft to 40 ft. is unacceptable in this corridor and location. We disagree with the Environmental Document's finding of No Significant Impact to Visual Resources. We implore the City to NOT ALLOW a change in building height. 3. ARCHITECTURE The urban industrial architectural style proposed below is grossly out of place in this area of La Quinta. Page 2 of 5 DUNAy.L Uj4t Homeowners Association No. 1 dunahoa@gmail.com The proposed development is surrounded by single family, single story homes with mostly tile roofs, as seen below: It is imperative that any development in this Image Corridor be consistent with surrounding resort -style neighborhoods. Some of the style themes prevalent around the La Quinta "Village" area are shown below: 4. VIOLATION OF GENERAL PLAN POLICES The proposed development adds nothing to this La Quinta Resort area neighborhoods, except additional traffic and significant visual impacts. Indeed, it would detract greatly from the desirability of living in La Quinta and would be a change in the character of the area forever. We believe the proposed La Quinta Village Apartments also violate the following General Plan policies: Page 3 of 5 DUNAy.U, C_Homeowners Association No. 1 dunahoa@gmail.com • GOAL LU-Z. High quality design that complements and enhances the City. o Policy LU-2.1 Changes and variations from the Zoning Ordinance in a Specific Plan will be offset by high quality design, amenities and mix of land uses. • GOAL LU-3. Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. o Policy LU-3.1 Encourage the preservation of neighborhood character and assure a consistent and compatible land use pattern. o Policy LU-3.3 Maintain residential development standards including setbacks, height, pad elevations and other design and performance standards that assure a high quality of development in the Zoning Ordinance. GOAL LU-4. Maintenance and protection of existing neighborhoods. o Policy LU-4.1 Encourage compatible development adjacent to existing neighborhoods and infrastructure. S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT In addition to the traffic and general plan issues noted above, we note that the Environmental Assessment is no longer valid, as it is out of date with the project description and supporting studies being changed. We don't believe the City Council should approve the General Plan Amendment to revise the City's Housing Element, Specific Plan Amendment to amend the existing La Paloma Specific Plan, nor the Site Development Permit without an approved Environmental Document. DEVELOPMENT SUGGESTIONS Any development in this location should consider the following design features: A. No three-story buildings. These are unacceptable in the resort zone. Be fully compliant with the City's existing height limitations. B. Move any entry point from Washington Street to the furthest point north possible, break the Washington Street median and provide a deceleration lane and left -turn -in pocket so southbound traffic doesn't need to use the Avenue 50 intersection. (this has been done in other locations on Washington Street) C. Maintain Spanish style architecture with tile roofs and stucco finish to better match area style. D. Eliminate any garages on the north property boundary, replace with solar -panel -covered parking and EV charging stations (similar to La Quinta City Hall). E. Plant large Ficus or Italian Cypress trees along the north border residential properties for visual screening. Page 4 of 5 DUNAy.L U,ii4,-Homeowners Association No. 1 dunahoa@gmail.com CLOSING We urge the City of La Quinta to reject this project in its current configuration, and NOT APPROVE the Environmental Document, Site Development Permit, General Plan Amendment, and Specific Plan Amendment for the La Quinta Village apartments. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Sincerely Keith G. Meyer, PE President, Duna La Quinta HOA No.1 78130 Calle Norte, La Quinta CA 92253 cc: Planning Dept., Duna La Quinta HOA Board of Directors, Villa Vista HOA, Duna Gardens HOA Page 5 of 5 Oscar Mojica From: Brandon Faulk <bef1991 @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 3:12 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Opposed to a new apartment complex Some people who received this message don't often get email from bef1991@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. I am a community member in the La Quinta Cove and I oppose the building of a multi story apartment complex for the following reasons: 1. It will block views of the mountains 2. It will increase traffic on Washington Street 3. It will add more noise to the cove 4. It will disrupt the beauty of the La Quinta Cove Brandon Faulk 52085 Avenida Herrera La Quinta, CA 92253 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM MEETING DATE: &/ �-3 Please give this completed form to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. This form is to assure accuracy in preparing the minutes as to spelling of names and addresses, as well as to allow staff to follow-up on requests made by members of the public. Completion of this form is voluntary. Once submitted to the City Clerk, this form becomes a public record, Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.: R Z_ Subject; _ L � ,,ItUl,'{ J 0 Support x'_ Oppose J Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Counciimembers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: ��hS� V � PO.., ` ' L, f P� OL,�T_ POT k.i4 rrT .r_ L-. Speaker Identification: Name 7 IL R- rp Address ; , , � t 01 0t, 6Uo Organ ization/Business W7tg1- Phone L e-mail _ t DD O d „' r+'- L c J YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetings & events, Visit the City's website for more information: vvww.La0ujntaCA,gov From: Joan Foster <joan@westcoastturf.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 11:15 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Development at 50 & Washington [Some people who received this message don't often get email from joan@westcoastturf.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear council, I am strongly opposed to the development planned for the corner of Washington and Ave 50. As a long time resident of La Quinta, I feel this is not the appropriate corner for this density or type of housing. The traffic impact would be substantial. Years ago the council made a decision to only have ONE road as an exit to the cove and lower communities. If there is a disaster where people must leave, it would be impossible to leave quickly and with another 400+ cars using Washington St, it would create more issues. This development is a huge mistake AGAIN. Joan Foster 78-234 Hacienda La Quinta Dr Sent from my iPhone CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM ICI E ETI N G DATE: (D /o j 1 Please give this completed form to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. This form fis to assure accuracy in preparing the minutes as to spelling of names and ' addresses, as well as to allow staff to follow-up on requests made by members of the publk. Cornpletfon of this form is voluntary. Once suhmitMd to the City Clerk, this form becomes a tuba is record. Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.:4A Subject: { r+f-- )v - Q Support ] Oppose 0 Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State taw from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Councilmemhers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: Speaker Identification: Name , I-? Address Org a n ization/Bu si ness Phone e-mail J YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetings & events. Visit the City's website for more information: wwvv.LaQuintaCA.gov CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM MEETING DATE: G016t/23 Please give this completed form to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive, This form is to assure accuracy In prepay-ing the rrainates as to speffing of` raarrFes and addresses, as well as to allow staff to follow-up on requests made by members OF the public. Completion al' this Form is voluntary. Once submitted to the City Clerk, this form becomes a p u b 6C record. L� Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.: Subject: U support Oppose Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed or the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action, MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Councilmernbers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: Speaker Identifi a ion Name Address a Orga n i zation j Busi ness Phone / CZJ ro., e-mail Gl� (-) W u YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetings & events. Visit the City's website for more information: vv vw.LaOuintaCA.gov From: Joe Hager <joehagerl19@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 5:22 PM To: Tania Flores; City Clerk Mail Subject: Proposed apartment complex, LaQunita Village EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. The Honorable Linda Evans, Mayor The Honorable Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tern The Honorable Kathleen Fitzpatrick The Honorable Deborah McGarrey The Honorable John Pena Dear La Quinta Council Members, I am writing to you to express my concerns regarding the apartment complex project proposed at 50th and Washington called La Quinta Village Apartments and our opposition to the project. My name is Joe Hager. My wife and I own a house in Duna La Quinta, which is directly across the intersection for the proposed high density development. We strongly oppose this development for the following reasons: 1. A proven fact: the higher the population density, the higher the crime rate; the higher the single-family land use, the lower the crime rate; and the higher the percentage of multifamily land -use, and the higher the crime rate, including higher rates of robbery, aggravated assault and rape. * From the study, titled "Land Use and Violent Crime," published in the November 2009 issue of the journal Criminology. There are currently numerous school children that walk through that intersection on their way to and from school. They will be at a much higher risk of kidnapping, assaults and rape due to this development. Those children will also have increased risks of serious injury or worse from the increased traffic at that intersection and the entrances/exits of this proposed development. There is also a proven relationship between home ownership and crime. This is true of both violent and property crime. The bottom 25 states in homeownership have violent crime rates that are 17.43 percent higher than in the top 25 states for homeownership. Property crime rates in low homeownership states are 6.31 percent higher than in high homeownership states 2. Higher density areas repel single-family homeowners. Homeowners prefer to be next to single-family homes rather than apartments. Thus, this development, at this location, will decrease the attractiveness of our adjacent single-family neighborhoods, and potentially decrease our property values. • higher crime rates drive down demand, which causes prices to fall in response 3. Increased density decreases neighborhood personal interactions, involvement and changes hPhavinrs_ One of the main reasons we were attracted to this area of Palm Springs was Old Town LaQuinta: it has the intimacy of the small town with its surrounding neighborhoods. As we go for morning walks or walk to dinner in Old Town, we meet numerous other similar, friendly homeowners, which fosters connections. More homeowners in a neighborhood results in more civic engagement and personal investment The proposed development, at this location, will negatively affect the friendliness and social interactions of our neighborhoods, including Old Town LaQuinta. • This will be the result of the increased transience and turnover of residents from the high density development, at that location. 4. A high density development with multi -storied apartment buildings would be out of place and not fit in with the adjacent neighborhoods, even with the latest proposed architectural modifications. This location is surrounded by small neighborhoods of single-family houses and should remain that way. • This intersection and Washington Ave is one of the main entrance points to our quaint Old Town LaQuinta, thus changing the Old Town feeling and historical ambience of our city. I strongly recommend that a different location is selected for this type of high density development to prevent the occurence of the above facts and issues. We do NOT support this development proposal nor the proposed amendments to the general plan, variances to the zoning nor the site development plan as proposed. 1) Please, do not approve the waiver to the current zoning. 2) Please, do not amend the general plan. This process was completed with analysis and community input. 3) Please, do not permit this project. VOTE NO Sincerely, Joe Hager From: Linda Evans Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 6:54 AM To: Jon McMillen; Monika Radeva Subject: Fwd: 50th and Washington Attachments: troutdale.docx Opposed Linda Evans Mayor City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 Cell: 760.899.3279 www.laauintaca.aov www.playinlaguinta.com From: Carol Herrick <clesertcaro12011@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 1:54:19 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov> Subject: 50th and Washington You don't often get email from desertcarol20ll@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. 1 July 26, 2023 Re: Proposed Site of the La Quinta Village Apartments I am writing to plead with the City Council to consider the concerns of their constituents. The name alone, of the proposed site, should raise a red flag. Does their rendering really reflect La Quinta? Does it reflect the "old town" feel? Does it take into consideration the surrounding neighborhood? I think if you really look at it, the answer is NO to all of the questions. When there was the proposal for the Senior rehab center, there was little to no opposition. It did not impair the views, it did not affect the traffic, it did not change the architecture of the La Quinta neighborhood, and they were going to bury the power polls that are on the north part of the property. We have seen the changes that The Irwin Group are going to make from the original plans. Lowering 7 of the 3 story buildings down to 3 %. That is not enough. The change should be to make them all 2 story buildings. Spread the complex out more. Once you approve any 3 story buildings, you set a precedent for more to come. Do we really want that? Do they really need a pickle ball court? The city already has a very nice facility for that. I feel that they can rearrange their plot plan and accommodate our wishes. Traffic is a major concern regardless of the studies that have been performed. The schools and the boys and girls club were not informed of this proposed construction. Don't you think that this would be a concern for them? Traffic will be heavier during the school year, children walking to school and having to circumvent the cars going in and out of the property. U turns being made at the intersection of the school property. The Irwin Group shows that they have 107 ADA apartments, but do you realize they only have 10 ADA assigned parking spaces? They say that this is affordable housing. Normal 1 bedroom apartments in La Quinta are renting from between $1800 t0 $2200 per month, therefore in order to be considered affordable housing, should these not rent for less. These new units, priced at $1900 for a 1 bedroom 600+sq ft apartment would only be affordable if you have 3 working tenants in 1 bedroom. The 2 bedroom even worse. You would need , 3-5 working tenants. I realize that we need affordable, low income housing. Plainly this is not it. They have pointed out that the corner of Fred Waring and Washington would be the site for this Low Income Housing, where is the owner of that property. Is it fair and just to pawn off the problem to them? Finally, I would like to address trust. We had a building on Washington that was going to be a museum, what happened? The Silver Rock area that is set to be developed, what is happening with that? Will this be another eyesore that doesn't finish? Can we trust this company to finish what they start? If due diligence is really performed can you say that this will carry through in the manner that is expected and that this company is trustworthy? I implore you to listen to the People of La Quinta. Thank you for your time, Michael and Carol Herrick 78580 Saguaro Rd La Quinta, Ca 92235 ,I TY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM� MEETING DATE: -1._ Please give this completed form to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Gouncilmembers to receive. mis I rn is to assLim accuracy in prepartny the minutles 2s to spo{ling of names and addresses, as weft as to allow staff to follow -Up on requests made by members of the public. Completion of this farm is voluntary, Once submitted to the City Cfark, this form becomes a public record. D Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.: Subject: ZA,4111r4 61L,4r,,C- AfW.k. 7-IU ors [] Support Oppose 1.1 Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Council mernbers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: Speaker Identification: Name Address O rga r ization/Business Phone e-mail 1.] YES, t wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emalls about rneetings & events. Visit the Cit `s vvebsite for more information. ww ,LaQuintaCA.gov To Vlfhorn It May Concern: I am writing to you to express my concerns regarding the very large and dense housing project proposed at 50th and Washington called La Qulnta Village Apartments and our opposition to the project. It is not that I oppose development and 1 understand the state needs to build more housing, and more affordable housing. I oppose this large and dense development as proposed because of the significant variance from the current zoning, incomplete analyses and further negative impacts, and this does not really include affordable housing. In summary the proposal is OVERBUILT, a BAD PLAN with unacceptable CONGESTION, is UNSAFE and a BAD FIT. While there has been a detailed impact report performed by a consultant hired by the builders, f do not believe they have incorporated observations within the community, nor actual baseline measurements including errors in the report. 1) OVERBUILT: A 252 unit proposal is significantly greater than the general plan allowances as zoned, Medium High Density, when we purchased our property. The intended purpose per Civil Code 9,30.060 is "To provide for the development and preservation of medium -high density neighborhoods (eight (8) to twelve (12) units per acre" and this proposal significantly exceeds that. "Tao many units in too small a space,..", commissioner Dale Tyerman. 2) BAD PLANI am sure the Planning Commission will hear arguments by the applicant that the project can't be built unless the Planning Commission supports the change to the General Plan and to up zone the property. I ask that when our council mambers hear from the apllicant the project "doesn't pencil" without their proposed changes, what they really mean is that they won't receive the same profit margin they desire vs modest changes that would keep the project within our zoning and general plan. 3) CONGESTION,. The number of parking spaces and the traffic impacts identified do not comport. With 520 parking spaces provided. the project would provide "homes" to almost twice as many cars as the proposed number of housing units. with the expectation that thane parking spaces would be occupied and used by the tenants in the building. Titus the trip generation rates used to calculate traffic and the accompanying impacts have have been significantly underestimated. Tenants driving south on Washington will have to make a U-turn at Avenue 50 to enter tyre complex, which will also cause increased congestion. 4) UNSAFE: This development is located near a sports complex, two schools, and a Boys & Girls Club which together create a great deal of traffic congestion in this area. We believe there is also a safety concern adding more cars to an area where parents are parking, delivering/picking-up Children, and children are walking to and from the faculties. 5) BAD FIT: The height and aesthetics match nothing in the nearby neighborhoods. They dramatically and negatively Change the character of the neighborhood. I ask the council to please hear and consider these comments from me and from yaur residents a$ you weigh the plan in total. We do NOT support this development propvsaJ nor the proposed amendments to the general plan, variances to the zoning nor the site development plan as proposed. 1) Please, do not approve the waiver to the current zoning, 2) Please, do not amend the general plan. This process was completed with analysis and community input. 3) Please, do not permit this project, VOTE NO Leroy Halt 49729 Avila Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT MATTER: La Quinta Village Apartments From: Cheri Flores Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 10:48 AM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Tania Flores; Danny Castro Subject: FW: APN 646-070-016 Irwin partners Application NW Corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 Hello Clerks, Forwarding comments for La Quinta Village Apt. I have not responded. Cheri Flores I Planning Manager City of La Quinta / 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph.760-777-7067 CALIFORNIA From: Todd Hopkins <thopkins@hopconsult.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 10:44 AM To: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: APN 646-070-016 Irwin partners Application NW Corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 You don't often get email from thopkins@hopconsult.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Good morning Ms. Flores, My name is Todd Hopkins. My fiancee Gina Calhoun and I are homeowners in La Quinta Country Club (Montero Estates subdivision). As you are likely aware, our home is within a couple hundred yards of the proposed development. We are opposed to the proposed plan amendment, specific plan and site development permit for the proposed project at the Northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in la Quinta. The plans density will bring additional traffic and noise and light pollution to the corner of Washington and Avenue 50 as well as the surrounding community. The traffic and noise from that area is already quite heavy at times. We have also experienced multiple security breaches and crime events in our area. The proposed project will bring additional traffic to the area including old town la quinta, roadways, golfcart access lanes and limited pedestrian throughways. The density of the area already tests the existing infrastructure. It is our position that we are adamantly opposed to the proposed development as planned for this parcel. I believe our neighbors are of the same mindset for the concerns outlined here. We thank you for your consideration and appreciate it, as we love this community and are proud to be part of it. Respectfully. Todd Hopkins and Gina Calhoun From: Linda Evans Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 6:53 AM To: Jon McMillen; Monika Radeva Subject: Fwd: No to La Quinta Village Apartments Oppose Linda Evans Mayor City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 Cell: 760.899.3279 www.laquintaca.gov www.playinlaquinta.com From: PetFlysRocks <tammypetflys@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 2:11:18 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov> Subject: No to La Quinta Village Apartments You don't often get email from tammypetflys@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. July 26, 2023 Re: Proposed Site of the La Quinta Village Apartments I am writing to plead with the City Council to consider the concerns of their constituents. The name alone, of the proposed site, should raise a red flag. Does their rendering really reflect La Quinta? Does it reflect the "old town" feel? Does it take into consideration the surrounding neighborhood? I think if you really look at it, the answer is NO to all of the questions. When there was the proposal for the Senior rehab center, there was little to no opposition. It did not impair the views, it did not affect the traffic, it did not change the architecture of the La Quinta neighborhood, and they were going to bury the power polls that are on the north part of the property. We have seen the changes that The Irwin Group are going to make from the original plans. Lowering 7 of the 3 story buildings down to 3 2. That is not enough. The change should be to make them all 2 story buildings. Spread the complex out more. Once you approve any 3 story buildings, you set a precedent for more to 1 come. Do we really want that? Do they really need a pickle ball court? The city already has a very nice facility for that. I feel that they can rearrange their plot plan and accommodate our wishes. Traffic is a major concern regardless of the studies that have been performed. The schools and the boys and girls club were not informed of this proposed construction. Don't you think that this would be a concern for them? Traffic will be heavier during the school year, children walking to school and having to circumvent the cars going in and out of the property. U turns being made at the intersection of the school property. The Irwin Group shows that they have 107 ADA apartments, but do you realize they only have 10 ADA assigned parking spaces? They say that this is affordable housing. Normal 1 bedroom apartments in La Quinta are renting from between $1800 t0 $2200 per month, therefore in order to be considered affordable housing, should these not rent for less. These new units, priced at $1900 for a 1 bedroom 600+sq ft apartment would only be affordable if you have 3 working tenants in 1 bedroom. The 2 bedroom even worse. You would need , 3-5 working tenants. I realize that we need affordable, low income housing. Plainly this is not it. They have pointed out that the corner of Fred Waring and Washington would be the site for this Low Income Housing, where is the owner of that property. Is it fair and just to pawn off the problem to them? Finally, I would like to address trust. We had a building on Washington that was going to be a museum, what happened? The Silver Rock area that is set to be developed, what is happening with that? Will this be another eyesore that doesn't finish? Can we trust this company to finish what they start? If due diligence is really performed can you say that this will carry through in the manner that is expected and that this company is trustworthy? I implore you to listen to the People of La Quinta. Thank you for your time, Tammy & Jerry Howard 78775 Sagebrush Ave La Quinta, Ca 92235 ra From: joejagent <joejagent@aol.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 4:26 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: FW: 50th and Washington Some people who received this message don't often get email from joejagent@aol.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. -------- Original message -------- From: joejagent <joejagent@aol.com> Date: 7/31/23 4:20 PM (GMT-08:00) To: cityclerk@laquintaca.gov Subject: 50th and Washington If you saw the destruction by the winds early this morning, you would know another reason to oppose 3 story buildings at that location. The area to the north gets strong winds from the south or southeast a few times a year. Tall buildings will work like when you put your thumb on a hose to get the stream to go faster and harder. This puts residents at greater risk of injury and property damage. Please note, as proposed the houses bordering the wall will lose value. This depreciation will ripple its way to all surrounding neighborhoods and then to others in the City. This will lead to loss of property tax revenue slowly but surely. No to three story buildings. No to inadequate parking for tenants. No for requiring permits to park in front of your own house. No to buildings constructed north/south. No to buildings with more than one floor with elevators and multi stair cases so disabled are not confind to one floor and emergency personnel can get people out in case of emergency. Thank you for your consideration, Joe Johnson Saguaro Rd La Quinta Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone From: Tania Flores Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:36 PM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Danny Castro; Cheri Flores Subject: FW: 50th & Washington Housing Project Please see public comment below regarding La Quinta Village Apartments. I have not sent a response. Thank you. Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores@LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Thomas Kenny <tklook585@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:28 PM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: 50th & Washington Housing Project ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I understand the City is meeting tomorrow to discuss this project. I would like to highlight on the record my DISAPPROVAL for the project moving forward. The scale and number of units is NOT consistent with the area. While I understand the need to create lower income housing this location doesn't seem ideal - surely there are other parts of the city where housing could be placed that would not create traffic issues and disrupt the consistency for the type of homes around it (single story units) Thanks Thomas Kenny From: Charlotte Leiss <leiss@sonic.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 10:18 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Vote No Some people who received this message don't often get email from leiss@sonic.net. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. The Honorable Linda Evans, Mayor The Honorable Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tern The Honorable Kathleen Fitzpatrick The Honorable Deborah McGarrey The Honorable John Pena Dear La Quinta Council Members, My name is Charlotte Leiss and my husband Rob and I have been residents of La Quinta at 49605 Avila Drive since 2022. We agree with the following remarks. I am writing to you to express my concerns regarding the very large and dense housing project proposed at 50th and Washington called La Quinta Village Apartments and our opposition to the project. It is not that I oppose development and I understand the state needs to build more housing, and more affordable housing. I oppose this large and dense development as proposed because of the significant variance from the current zoning, incomplete analyses and further negative impacts, and this does not really include affordable housing. In summary the proposal is OVERBUILT, a BAD PLAN with unacceptable CONGESTION, is UNSAFE and a BAD FIT. While there has been a detailed impact report performed by a consultant hired by the builders, I do not believe they have incorporated observations within the community, nor actual baseline measurements including errors in the report. 1) OVERBUILT: A 252 unit proposal is significantly greater than the general plan allowances as zoned, Medium High Density, when we purchased our property. The intended purpose per Civil Code 9.30.060 is "To provide for the development and preservation of medium - high density neighborhoods (eight (8) to twelve (12) units per acre" and this proposal significantly exceeds that. "Too many units in too small a space...", commissioner Dale Tyerman. 2) BAD PLAN: I am sure the Planning Commission will hear arguments by the applicant that the project can't be built unless the Planning Commission supports the change to the General Plan and to up zone the property. I ask that when our council members hear from the applicant the project "doesn't pencil" without their proposed changes, what they really mean is that they won't receive the same profit margin they desire vs modest changes that would keep the project within our zoning and general plan. 3) CONGESTION: The number of parking spaces and the traffic impacts identified do not comport. With 520 parking spaces provided, the project would provide "homes" to almost twice as many cars as the proposed number of housing units, with the expectation that those parking spaces would be occupied and used by the tenants in the building. Thus the trip generation rates used to calculate traffic and the accompanying impacts have have been significantly underestimated. Tenants driving south on Washington will have to make a U-turn at Avenue 50 to enter the complex, which will also cause increased congestion. 4) UNSAFE: This development is located near a sports complex, two schools, and a Boys & Girls Club which together create a great deal of traffic congestion in this area. We believe there is also a safety concern adding more cars to an area where parents are parking, delivering/picking-up children, and children are walking to and from the facilities. 5) BAD FIT: The height and aesthetics match nothing in the nearby neighborhoods. They dramatically and negatively change the character of the neighborhood. I ask the council to please hear and consider these comments from me and from your residents as you weigh the plan in total. We do NOT support this development proposal nor the proposed amendments to the general plan, variances to the zoning nor the site development plan as proposed. 1) Please, do not approve the waiver to the current zoning. 2) Please, do not amend the general plan. This process was completed with analysis and community input. 3) Please, do not permit this project. VOTE NO Charlotte and Rob Leiss 49605 Avila Dr., La Quinta, CA Charlotte Leiss m +1 707-799-1526 Sent from Charlotte's Whone ITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM MEETING DATE: CE�Qi VaL�23 Please give this completed form tot the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmernbers to receive. This form is to assure accuracy is preparing the minutes as to spelling of names and addresses, as well as to allow staff to follow-up on requests made by members of the public. Completion of this form is voluntary. once submr tted to the City Clerk, this form becomes a ou blic record. atters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.: ilcA Subject: A) Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; ;j� your input will be taken under consideration Q Support ose and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Councilmembers or staff or audience) o not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: Speaker Identification Name ✓ E74 Address —7 0 rga n izati ors f Bus i ness Phone 0 1 h�_ 1-0 V" , W,0 — LN, e-mail k<z " 0 L1�7_ v t A�_ L� ?.YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetings & events. Visit the City's website for more information: wwvv.L@QuintaCA.gov CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAKFORM MEETING DATE: - Please give this completed farm to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. This form is to assure accuracy w preparing the minutes as to spelling of naives and addresses, as welt es to affow staff to follow-up or? requests made by members of the public. Completion of this farm 15 voluntary. Dace submitted to the City Oerk, this form becomes a public record. 0 Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.: - Subject: 14 06,rd-[fit 1Ice, E_ AP -,Os Support Oppose F1 Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Councilmembers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: Speaker Identification Name )c 5 - 3 --Z- e 0 r- Address Oz 4-L-: t2 tpc} Organization/ Business Phone � .1- e-mail srC�I�cC J YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetings & events. Visit the City's website for more information: www.La uintaCA. ov August 1, 202 Honorable Members City Council City of La Quinta 75495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA Re: Irwin Partners Application for General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and Site Development Permit for a 252-Unit Apartment Project Dear Council Members: We live in Montero Estates just off Washington very near the above proposed development. The proposed development of this property on the northeast corner of Ave. 50 is not in the best interests of our neighborhood or the City. The plans call for 252 multi -story units which would obstruct the line of sight for the home owners directly to the north... not neighborly. Adding up to 50 parking spaces would create a traffic nightmare on Washington and the surrounding streets. We already have very heavy traffic on Washington from City Hall to Huey.111. The added traffic would be dangerous for children and families going to schools, nearby playgrounds and sports fields, or wralking to Cld Town. We would have no issue with single family homes being developed on this site. The applications from Irwin Partners referenpeclabovp should he rejected by all members of the City Council:- Sincerely, Herbert and Louise McCabe 49611 Avenida Montero, La Quinta, CA 92253 From: Linda Evans Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 6:49 AM To: Jon McMillen; Monika Radeva Subject: Fwd: Comment for the Record: Proposed Apartment Complex Avenue 50 & Washington Linda Evans Mayor City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 Cell: 760.899.3279 www.laquintaca.gov www.playinlaquinta.com From: Mary Montgomery <marye. montgomery@mac.com> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2023 1:06:42 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; kfitzpatrick@laquintca.gov <kfitzpatrick@laquintca.gov>; dmgarrey@laquintaca.gov <dmgarrey@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Comment for the Record: Proposed Apartment Complex Avenue 50 & Washington You don't often get email from marye.montgomery@mac.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Earlier I emailed two petitions with the names and addresses of 360 LaQuinta residents who oppose the apartment project at Washington & 50th. The first of these two petitions was presented to the City on July 7, the second emailed on 7/29. What is important to understand about these petitions is that I emailed 375 LaQuinta residents; 96% (360 residents) wrote in opposition to the project. The two who were not in opposition were both developers. One thing is clear: Residents of LaQuinta DO NOT support this project. These are your constituents. Unlike the developer, they are the people who live in LaQuinta. They cherish the community and want to preserve its peace and natural beauty as our City continues to grow. They are the people who pay taxes here and strongly support the expanding local business community. These concerned citizens have voiced their apprehension over the inevitable increase in traffic, including the required U-turn at Avenue 50 and Moon River Drive, and have called to your attention the safety of the more than 650 children who attend Harry Truman school and after school activities at the Boys & Girls Club. They are also disquieted over the height of the 3 story units (proposed at 27% above code, it is sure to interrupt view corridors) and the density of the 252 units. Of course, we know that growth is inevitable. But we also know that it can and should be growth that enhances the beauty, environment and overall livability of LaQuinta -- something for which we can be proud and that extends the desirability of LaQuinta as a community in which to live, work and grow. Thank you for your consideration and for the opportunity to present the views of the 360 residents whose names appear on the petition. Mary Elizabeth Montgomery 49300 Avenida Fernando La Quinta 760-989-3939 Monika Radeva From: Linda Evans Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 6:10 PM To: Jon McMillen; Monika Radeva Subject: Fwd: Apts at 50th & Washington Oppose Linda Evans Mayor City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 Cell: 760.899.3279 www.laauintaca.aov www.playinlaquinta.com From: Brad Nelson <wbnelson44@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 6:06:59 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Apts at 50th & Washington [You don't often get email from wbnelson44@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear Mayor Evans: I am writing you to request that this proposed apartment project be denied as currently proposed. I live in the Palmilla neighborhood at 50th and Jefferson so I pass the subject site almost every day. My personal background includes an in-depth knowledge of development ( Bachelors and Masters degrees in Urban Planning plus decades in the development industry having planned and developed residential, apartment, office, industrial and resort projects, including with clients such as Ernie Vossler.) The project is an in -fill one which typically should be compatible with its surrounding neighborhood. I reviewed the proposed project and found it lacking suitable findings and justifications for its approval such as - 1. The intensity (density) of the use is not compatible with the surrounding community of low density, mostly one - storey residential use. The intensity creates excessive parking needs and traffic impacts. 2. There is no market demand analysis that supports this apartment use (demand by price, unit type, and absorption rate) at this location, at this time. I have repeatedly asked for a market study for the site, but none is available. 3. The architecture - scale, 3 storey building heights, mixed architectural character and site planning - are not compatible with the surrounding community. 4. The streetscape does not continue the existing character of the surrounding image streets. 5. 1 suggest that a small mixed use project of limited residential and office/commercial uses would be a better neighbor : all one storey buildings, different/better access and reduced parking and traffic impacts, and more landscaping on the site. 6. Also some limited residential (e.g. attached single family) and a pocket park on the corner could be a great asset to the community. Planting trees is the best means of reducing carbon in the air ( sequestration) if that is a city goal. 7. 1 believe the community wants compatible, integrated development on this site regardless of the affordability issues. After the first Planning Commission meeting, I requested that the developer meet with and work with the community in a workshop to create a plan that would achieve community support. No workshop meetings were held, then the developer presented its new plan without community input a fews days before the last commission meeting, The proposed project with revisions does not meet the goals and objectives of the surrounding residents of the community, nor, I believe, the City! Please reject the proposed development. Respectfully, Brad Nelson 50370 Via Puente La Quinta, CA Sent from my !Phone Brad Nelson From: Joe Nemeth <josephj.nemeth@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 1:40 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Written Comments - Joseph Nemeth La Quinta, La Quinta Village Apartments Some people who received this message don't often get email from joseph.j.nemeth@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. The Honorable Linda Evans, Mayor The Honorable Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tern The Honorable Kathleen Fitzpatrick The Honorable Deborah McGarrey The Honorable John Pena Dear La Quinta Council Members, My name is Joseph Nemeth and my wife Stacy and I have been residents of La Quinta at 78144 Hacienda La Quinta Dr since 2019. I am writing to you to express my concerns regarding the very large and dense housing project proposed at 50th and Washington called La Quinta Village Apartments and our opposition to the project. It is not that I oppose development and I understand the state needs to build more housing, and more affordable housing. I oppose this large and dense development as proposed because of the significant variance from the current zoning, incomplete analyses and further negative impacts, and this does not really include affordable housing. In summary the proposal is OVERBUILT, a BAD PLAN with unacceptable CONGESTION, is UNSAFE and a BAD FIT. While there has been a detailed impact report performed by a consultant hired by the builders, I do not believe they have incorporated observations within the community, nor actual baseline measurements including errors in the report. 1) OVERBUILT: A 252 unit proposal is significantly greater than the general plan allowances as zoned, Medium High Density, when we purchased our property. The intended purpose per Civil Code 9.30.060 is "To provide for the development and preservation of medium - high density neighborhoods (eight (8) to twelve (12) units per acre" and this proposal significantly exceeds that. "Too many units in too small a space...", commissioner Dale Tyerman. 2) BAD PLAN: I am sure the Planning Commission will hear arguments by the applicant that the project can't be built unless the Planning Commission supports the change to the General Plan and to up zone the property. I ask that when our council members hear from the applicant the project "doesn't pencil" without their proposed changes, what they really mean is that they won't receive the same profit margin they desire vs modest changes that would keep the project within our zoning and general plan. 3) CONGESTION: The number of parking spaces and the traffic impacts identified do not comport. With 520 parking spaces provided, the project would provide "homes" to almost twice as many cars as the proposed number of housing units, with the expectation that those parking spaces would be occupied and used by the tenants in the building. Thus the trip generation rates used to calculate traffic and the accompanying impacts have have been significantly underestimated. Tenants driving south on Washington will have to make a U-turn at Avenue 50 to enter the complex, which will also cause increased congestion. 4) UNSAFE: This development is located near a sports complex, two schools, and a Boys & Girls Club which together create a great deal of traffic congestion in this area. We believe there is also a safety concern adding more cars to an area where parents are parking, delivering/picking-up children, and children are walking to and from the facilities. 5) BAD FIT: The height and aesthetics match nothing in the nearby neighborhoods. They dramatically and negatively change the character of the neighborhood. 3 stories, overhanging and overbuilt parking, and a facade that matches nothing in the Old La Quinta nor nearby Hacienda style homes. I ask the council to please hear and consider these comments from me and from your residents as you weigh the plan in total. We do NOT support this development proposal nor the proposed amendments to the general plan, variances to the zoning nor the site development plan as proposed. 1) Please, do not approve the waiver to the current zoning. 2) Please, do not amend the general plan. This process was completed with analysis and community input. 3) Please, do not accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration 4) Please, do not permit this project. VOTE NO Joseph and Stacy Nemeth 78144 Hacienda La Quinta Dr, La Quinta, CA Joe Nemeth m +1 408-421-1295 From: Malott Nyhart <mwnyhart@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 1:32 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Proposed housing development Ave. 50/Washington Street Some people who received this message don't often get email from mwnyhart@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. I am a homeowner at 78013 Lago Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253. I am writing to the LQ City Council to reject the current proposed apartment housing proposal recently rejected by the Planning commission. I believe that this corner can support a nice housing project but the proposed 200+ units will create unsafe traffic movement if approved as planned. As a daily pedestrian and bicycle rider I have elected to NEVER ride my bike on Washington St from LQ village to U.S Highway 111 due to the extremely fast vehicles which travel at almost interstate speeds. The police are obviously unable to slow the traffic and therefore any additional traffic turning onto Washington or any access on Washington will very likely create more mishaps. I have witnessed too many racing cars switching lanes above the speed limit to avoid legally driven cars to believe this area can handle more entry into this area. Surely, there is a developer who can build nice enough homes to support the area within the social constraints imposed. Malott Nyhart From: Ben Olson <ben@oe-ca.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:27 PM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: 'Kappy Olson (kaptoby@msn.com)' Subject: Public Comment Attachments: LQ Village Apartments Opposition Letter.docx Some people who received this message don't often get email from ben@oe-ca.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. La Quinta City Clerk's office, Thank you for incorporating the attached public comment letter into the August 1, 2023 City Council meeting public record. The letter is regarding Item #2 under Public Hearing, La Quinta Village Apartment proposal. Respectfully, Ben and Kappy Olson July 31, 2023 The Honorable Linda Evans, Mayor The Honorable Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tern The Honorable Kathleen Fitzpatrick The Honorable Deborah McGarrey The Honorable John Pena Dear La Quinta City Council Members: My name is Ben Olson, my wife is Kappy Olson, my home is located at 49575 Rancho San Francisquito in the Talante development of La Quinta. I am writing regarding Public Hearing Item #2, 252-Unit Apartment Project, La Quinta Village Apartments, on the Tuesday, August 1, 2023, City Council agenda. We have been residents of La Quinta since 1980. We have owned our home and lived in the Talante Community for the past 20 years. We understand that affordable housing is needed in our community. We support genuine efforts to build affordable housing, we just don't believe this project is being proposed in the right location and the rental prices are not affordable to the people who need them most. We OPPOSE this project for the following reasons: Traffic congestion this development will create on Washington Street and Avenue 50 will severely impact everyone in the surrounding area. We understand the traffic study for this proposal was completed during the pandemic and does not accurately calculate the current traffic congestion in this area. Tenants driving south on Washington will have to make a U-turn at Avenue 50 to enter the complex, which will also cause increased congestion. This development is located near a sports complex, two schools, and a Boys & Girls Club which together create a great deal of traffic congestion in this area. There is also a safety concern adding more cars to an area where parents are parking, delivering/picking-up children, and children are walking to and from the facilities. We believe that for people who truly need affordable housing to live in this development there is the possibility more people will live in the complex than is projected, therefore, increasing the number of cars driving in and out and parking in the development. This project is simply too large for this parcel of land. The developer is trying to do too much with 14 acres and the density is too great for this small corner of our community. If we are really going to tackle the affordable housing issue, then we must build truly affordable housing. Thank you for considering our comments and hope you will vote NO on this proposal. Respectfully, Ben and Kappy Olson 49575 Rancho San Francisquito, La Quinta From: Tania Flores Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 10:25 AM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Danny Castro; Cheri Flores Subject: FW: Council meeting Aug 1 Please see public comment regarding La Quinta Village Apartments below. I have not responded. Thank you. Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores@LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov -----Original Message ----- From: christine peck <cmhpeck@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 10:12 AM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Council meeting Aug 1 [You don't often get email from cmhpeck@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Good morning, As an owner/resident of Duna la Quinta neighborhood, I wish to strongly state my objection to the proposed development on Washington St and 52nd Ave, La Quinta. The many reasons have been detailed by our neighborhood leaders and are too numerous to restate here. Yours Sincerely, Christine Peck 78042 Calle Norte, La Quinta, CA 92253 From: Tania Flores Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 7:50 AM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Cheri Flores Subject: FW: For City Council 8/1 meeting: Petitions re Planned Apartments: Avenue 50 & Washington Attachments: July 6 Petition Letter.docx; Petition Letter No. 2.docx Please see public comment below and attached regarding the La Quinta Village Apartments. I have not issued a response. CIA1.11FOESNIA Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores(a_)LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov From: Mary Montgomery <marye. montgomery@mac.com> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 2:31 PM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: For City Council 8/1 meeting: Petitions re Planned Apartments: Avenue 50 & Washington EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Tania, Attached is the petition I dropped off at City Hall on July 7 showing the names and LaQuinta addresses for the 311 individuals who asked that their names be added to those IN OPPOSITION to the Apartment complex planned for Avenue 50 & Washington. Also attached is a second petition showing an additional 49 names and LaQuinta addresses who asked that their names be added to those IN OPPOSITION to the Apartment complex planned for Avenue 50 & Washington. Can you please add these two petitions showing the 360 names of those IN OPPOSITION into the public record comments and confirm to me these 360 names will become part of the public comments. Many thanks for your assistance. Mary E. Montgomery 49300 Avenida Fernando La Quinta 92253 July 7, 2023 TO: LaQuinta City Council Members RE: Proposed Project: NE Corner of Washington & Avenue 50 We urge the City Council NOT to approve this project for the following reasons: • At 252 units, some 3-story (and without elevators), this proposed development is too dense for the surrounding neighborhoods. (Without the so-called "Density Bonus", code for developing this property is limited to 177 units.) • With 522 parking spaces, traffic on Avenue 50 is sure to increase significantly, resulting in less safety and increased noise and light pollution, thus impairing quality of life and, in some cases, interrupting view corridors of existing residents. • The proposed height of the three-story units is 28 feet, six feet or 27% above the 22- foot code. • There are questions about whether the proposed development compromises the safety of children who attend the nearby Middle School and Boys & Girls Club, located at Moon River Drive. Many of these children walk, roller blade or ride their bikes to/from school. The safety situation is exacerbated by the U-turns at Eastbound Avenue 50 and the Park/Moon River intersection that will be required to access the proposed property. • The property is owned by a company in Oregon; the developer is in Costa Mesa, both with little vested interest in preserving the quality of life that we have come to enjoy as LaQuinta residents. We agree that development this vacant property is inevitable and can be a positive for the City. BUT it can and should be developed in a manner that ensures safety, consistency with La Quinta's charm and style, and serves to preserve the peace and view corridors of LaQuinta -- as other developments in or near Old Town have achieved to good effect. Bruce & Daisy Albertson 48-751 San Vincente Cindy Anderson 488-955 El Nido Jim Armatus 49-165 Avenida El Nido Rebecca Backes 78-230 San Timoteo Al & Diana Backman 49-125 Avenida Fernando Phil Backman & Sharon Sledhil 49285 Avenida El Nido James Baldwin & Kathy Moran 78823 Breckenridge Drive Beth & George Barnes 48-711 San Vincente Brad Barrett 48-750 San Lucas Ron & Lynn Beeler 78262 Calle Las Ramblas Susan & Larry Bianchi 79-780 Tangelo Street Elizabeth & Frank Billante 49-815 Rancho San Felipe Shawn & Laura Bitzan 48-135 Hermosa Jeff & Vicky Botsford 49-380 Avenida Fernando Kay & Bob Brehm 80-073 Riviera Ken & Kay Broadie 49-035 Cedros Circle Ted & Liz Broedlow 48-771 San Vincente Nancy Buford 49-931 Coachella Drive Sila van den Bussche 50440 Cypress Point Drive Linda & Dave Campbell 78-269 Hacienda La Quinta Drive John Carnes & Shannon Devlin 49-732 Avila Drive Marilu & Allan Carroll 79-120 Big Horn Trail Deborah Carter & Jessica Ruh 49-434 Avila Drive Marge & Gary Chamberlain 49-506 Avila Drive Richard & Raelene Christie 78-125 Lago Drive Bill & Diane Cornell 50745 Cypress Point Drive Judie & Richard Cothrun 49-335 Avenida Fernando John & Carol Cowden 49-790 Coachella Drive Tom & Janet Curtis 77-935 Lago Drive Debbie Dale 78-007 Lago Drive Dina & Mike Dargis 78-179 Hacienda LaQuinta Charlotte Davis 78186 Calle Norte James & Diane Deckert 49-789 Coachella Drive Romeo & Erika Dela Rosa 48-905 Avenida Fernando Jerry & Joanne Dickey 77-941 Lago Drive Jerry Donahue 49-488 Avila Drive Suzanne & Joe Donnelly 49-644 Avila Drive Laurie & Dan Donohue 49-847 Coachella Drive Jo Downey & Harry Wilson 78-020 Coronados Circle Sue Driscoll 78911 Breckenridge Drive Maureen Dugan 48-770 Via Linda Sandy Dyer 48-800 San Isidro Street Terry & Kevin Eastley 50640 Spyglass Hill Drive Steve Eckinger & Marsha Soday 49-650 Eisenhower Patti & Jim Eddy 49-350 Avenida Anselmo Mary & Mark Engler 57615 Coral Mountain Court Tina Everson 49-680 Coachella Dan & Tammy Fairchild 78-285 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Mark & Lynda Farnen 78835 Grand Traverse Corey & Heidi Farr 49-750 Entrada Circle Deborah Fenn 49-783 Candaleria Julia Fisher 49-825 Lago Drive Eric & Holly Fiskum 45-385 Guijarro Drive Rob & Sera Lynn Florek 48-700 Santa Ursula Street Dr. Wilbert & Glenna Friesen 50720 Cypress Point Drive Jeannie & John Fuller 47-675 Via Montessa Mike & Tracie Furlong 27332 Via Amistoso Marcia Gallagher 77-985 Lago Roger & Jacqueline Garvin 50685 Grand Traverse Avenue Rhonda Gerke 77370 Calle Quintana Jamie Gluck & John Wentworth 77240 Arteaga Renata & Jay Green 77-285 Loma Vista Marta & Rob Griffin 78-270 Hacieda La Quinta Drive Sue & John Hagestad 49-128 Avenida Fernando Fred & Carol Hanley 78-065 Coronados Circle Kathy Hatfield 47-610 Eisenhower Drive Garry Harris & Marcia Wolfe 78875 Grand Traverse Avenue Steve & Erin Hernandez 49575 Avenida Montero Greg & Jennifer Hicks 78540 Bottlebrush Drive Carl & Sheila Highgenboten 78-180 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Todd Hopkins & Gina Calhoun 49537 Avenida Montero Pat Hogan & Ross Johnson 78-017 Lago Drive Greg & Glenna Helm 48-700 San Dimas Street Bob & Ann Hogeboom 78-225 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Skeeter & Suzie Holt 49-729 Avila Drive Moe & Phil Hosp 78-048 San Timoteo Charlie & Kathy Hough 78688 Cabrillo Way Joan Jeffrey 49-749 Entrada Circle Julianne Keil 78-086 Lago Drive Emma Kite 49-614 Avila Drive Jay & Sharon Kleinheinz 78-750 Eisenhower Drive Harry & Bonnie Kloosterman 48-454 Via Palomino John Kramer & Jon McBride 48-900 El Nido Drive Bill & Pam Lane 48-720 Avenida Fernando Rob Lang & Alisa Martin 49-100 Avenida Anselmo Mark & Patricia Langermann 78-995 Del Monte Court Angela Lafferty 50380 Spyglass Hill Steve & Susie Lewis 49-416 Avila Drive Kathy Lester 78-084 San Timoteo Pete Lexus Spyglass Hill Maureen Liebman 48-741 San Vincente Street Joe and Angela Lis 78-182 Calle Las Ramblas Karen & Lou Lister 49-845 Lago Drive Paul & Susie Lyon 49-517 Guijarro Drive Virgil & Patty Macaluso 78-108 Lago Drive Keith & Gail MacLeod 49-829 Adelito Circle Tom & Meg Maloney 77-305 Loma Vista Drive Bert & Louise McCabe 49-600 Avenida Montero Mac & Missy McGee 49-830 Coachella Drive Diane McGonigle 48-800 Santa Ursula Drive Jan & Dave McLintock 49-756 Avila Drive Duncan & Becky McInnis 78-068 San Timoteo Bill & Pat McKamey 50300 Spyglass Hill Drive Kevin & Liz Mechelke 49-786 Coachella Drive Grace & Neal Mehta 53480 Avenida Mendoza Karen & Dave Matheson 78182 Calle Norte Mike & Patti Mergerner 48-685 Via Sierra David & Mirella Mesrobian 787 Castle Pines Drive Robert Millar & Mario Guriso 78-165 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Beau & Nancy Miller 78-002 San Timoteo Eileen Mohler 78-153 San Timoteo Renee Monroe Spyglass Hill Mary & Jim Montgomery 49-300 Avenida Fernando Roper & Kelly Morris 49-800 Coachella Drive Jim & Denise Murphy 77-947 Lago Drive Jennifer Murray 78-015 Coronados Circle Judee Myers 50255 Doral Street Joe & Stacy Nemeth 78-144 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Richard & Sharon Nevins 78-635 Mandarina Jim & Diane Nichols 49-841 Coachella Drive Carol Lynn Noack 77-990 Lago Drive Bob Noack 49-251 Avenida Fernando Malott & Nancy Nyhart 78-013 Lago Drive Dan & Beverly O'Connor 77-490 Loma Vista Matt & Trish O'Connor 49-505 Coachella Drive John & Kathy O'Keefe 78-211 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Morgan & Larry Pfeiffer 49-725 Anacapa Circle Joe Perricone 49-415 Avenida Montero Zsuzsanna & Michael Pheil 48-721 San Isidro Cathleen & Shawn Pierce 49-835 Lago Drive Cheryl & Don Pope 49-705 Coachella Drive Peggy & Tom Pyle 78-126 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Carolyn & Richard Randall 78991 Breckenridge Drive Joel Raven 49-814 Coachella Drive Audrey Reed 50235 Doral Street Steve & Jan Reenders 78-268 Calle Las Rmblas Gus Rendon & Anita Agzarian 50815 Nispero Sandy Robbins 78-570 Bottle Brush Leni Roberts 78-120 San Timoteo Mark & Anita Roberts 78-120 San Timoteo Jim & Betty Robinson 49-700 Coachella Drive George & June Romine 49-398 Avila Drive Marian & Bob Rosenwasser 48-608 Paseo Terazo Mitch Rouse 49-455 Coachella Drive Kay Ruttman 48-761 Coachella Drive Toni Salhus 78-080 Calle Norte Cynthia Pistilli Savage & Paul Fournier 49-885 Lago Drive Joe Scaccia 50855 Grand Traverse Robert & Kelly Scannell 49-495 Avenida Montero Kathy & Bob Schowe 49-407 Guijarro Drive Mary & Morgan Shay 49-823 Adelito Drive Nancy Shuma 78-269 Hacienda La Quinta Drive Sarah & Don Siegmund 49-705 Anacapa Circle Gary & Melanie Singer 78-435 Coyote Canyon Court Bill & Carol Slifer 78-023 San Timoteo Tom & Mary Michael Sterchi 78-096 Coronados George & Jean Stephenson 48-751 San Dimas Street John & Angie Stout 49-685 Anacapa Drive Michael & Betty Terry 78-083 San Timoteo Kelly Trembley 78453 Calle Huerta Dr. Danielle Ulian 78-230 Lago Drive Celeste Varela 49960 Avila Drive OD & Jana Vincent 78745 Avenida La Jarita Carter & Meg Wagner 78-067 San Timoteo Ken & Tracy Wallis 47-800 Eisenhower Drive Linda Weil 49-695 Coachella Susan & Jim Weir 49-578 Avila Drive Helen & Dick Welsh 50505 Grand Traverse Avenue Charles & Penny Wentworth 77-144 Lago Drive Donna Westgate 78800 Castle Pines Drive Kevin & Kimberly White 78815 Grand Traverse Joni & Dave Wilson 77-975 Lago Drive Nancy Winton 49980 Calle Estrada Marian Wood 78-133 Lago Drive Lacey & Ashlyn Wooden 52795 Avenida Navarro Steve & Alice Wright 77965 Grey Wolf Trail Josie & Griffin Yoon 78-083 Calle Norte Carl & Ali Zinn 49-200 Avenida Fernando NOTE: All of the individuals shown above provided their specific request to be added to the petition because they object to the project. These requests were via email, and those emails are available for inspection. In addition, here are some notable quotes, made with attribution: "This project is not acceptable due to the safety for children and congestion at a very busy intersection with high speed traffic!!!!" -John O'Keefe "You absolutely have my permission to add my name to this petition. I am totally against this project as projected . We are already overpopulated! The city needs to do the right thing for their voters and population and turn down this ridiculous proposal." — Leni Roberts "Please add our name. I already sent a letter to the LQ council in opposition but that shouldn't affect its standing. I watched the planning commission hearing last week and I'm pleased that the chairwoman and a majority voted it down. I would think the LQ city council wouldn't vote against a project opposed by their chair but one never knows what special interests lurk behind the curtain." - Malott Nyhart "The planned structure sounds horrific especially as it is higher than the 22 foot code." - Jennifer Murray "Thanks for the work you are doing to curtail a totally inappropriate development. Don't know if you get up near Jefferson and 111, but the development that has sprung out of the ground this past year is unsightly and incredibly dense. It isn't in the middle of town like the one at 50th would be, but still is an abomination!" — Kay Brehm "Please add us to the petition opposing the high density housing complex proposed by out of state developers for the 50th Avenue/Washington intersection in LaQuinta. The increased danger to school children who cross that intersection on a daily basis for school and the Boys & Girls Club is of great concern to us. The density of the project for an already very busy, heavily traveled area is far too much." - Mary Michael Sterchi "You can add my name for sure! This high density development would be a disaster for the community and belongs somewhere else!" - Tom Maloney "We are totally against this project. It would be a nightmare on several levels." - Bert McCabe "We do not think it is an appropriate development in the highly contested area." — Bill McKamey "Absolutely agree and please add our names. Sera -Lynn and I in support of the opposition to this project. We are very adverse to the potential for this and glad to see other friends and neighbors are as well." — Rob Florek "We agree with your petition and ask you to add both our names. We are especially concerned about the height, number of units, and access to 50th Avenue. We don't know of any other structures nearby that are as high as the planned new development. The need for U-turns is particularly dangerous at the intersection of Moon River and 50th where so many children are present." — Patricia Hogan "Count us in! Thank you for taking the time to put together that very cogent letter. I had no idea this would become a real threat. It seems so obvious to be a terrible location, and there are so many lots more suitable." - Suzie Lewis "Thank you so much to you and all of the others pushing back on a project that probably has way too much density compared to the surrounding neighborhoods. Hopefully the zoning they currently have is not compatible with the huge development. They are proposing which would give the city the opportunity to tell them they need to design their project within the zoning jurisdiction. Good Luck trying to get them to lower the density o their project which is completely surrounded by very nice single-family homes." - John Kramer " Please add Julie and I on your list. The project is out of character to our area in La Quinta and is way too high density." - Perry Johnson "Yes, you have my permission to add my name to the petition. It sounds like a terrible plan. Not soundly put together." - Tina Everson "Please add our names. I have been reading about it on the La Quinta news I get each day. We certainly don't want it. I did read where they came back and changed several things that were asked to be changed during the last city council meeting. However, I think we want an apartment complex at all at that corner..." - Marsha Soday "I have been active against this particular development. We also believe the level of traffic, the congestion and safety next to the school and the boys and girls club is just unacceptable." - Joe Nemeth "We also believe the level of traffic, the congestion and safety next to the school and the boys and girls club is just unacceptable." - Stacy Nemeth "We drove by the empty lot yesterday. It's huge! Certainly somebody can develop it into something attractive and appropriate for our community. — Beth Barnes "You have my permission to read my name as being AGAINST approval by the City Council at its upcoming meeting regarding the proposed project at Washington and 50th Streets in La Quinta. I am particularly distressed that it is being proposed by an out-of-state company that has no interest in the community whatsoever, other than its own financial benefit. While I understand the general appeal of developing the property so that it no longer remains a vacant lot, including something that would increase the tax base of the City, there has to be a better approach which is in greater keeping with and benefit to the surrounding area, and which has a lesser impact on an already exceedingly busy intersection plagued by high speed traffic, often too heavy for the community at times." - Joel Raven "You absolutely have my permission to add my name to this petition. I am totally against this project as projected . We are already overpopulated! The city needs to do the right thing for their voters and population and turn down this ridiculous proposal. — Leni Roberts "The density of the project for an already very busy intersection, and the additional dangers the school children will face traveling to and from their schools and the Boys & Girls Club are the primary concerns for us. —Tom Sterchi From: Tania Flores Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 7:50 AM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Cheri Flores Subject: FW: For City Council 8/1 meeting: Petitions re Planned Apartments: Avenue 50 & Washington Attachments: July 6 Petition Letter.docx; Petition Letter No. 2.docx Please see public comment below and attached regarding the La Quinta Village Apartments. I have not issued a response. CIA1.11FOESNIA Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores(a_)LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov From: Mary Montgomery <marye. montgomery@mac.com> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 2:31 PM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: For City Council 8/1 meeting: Petitions re Planned Apartments: Avenue 50 & Washington EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Tania, Attached is the petition I dropped off at City Hall on July 7 showing the names and LaQuinta addresses for the 311 individuals who asked that their names be added to those IN OPPOSITION to the Apartment complex planned for Avenue 50 & Washington. Also attached is a second petition showing an additional 49 names and LaQuinta addresses who asked that their names be added to those IN OPPOSITION to the Apartment complex planned for Avenue 50 & Washington. Can you please add these two petitions showing the 360 names of those IN OPPOSITION into the public record comments and confirm to me these 360 names will become part of the public comments. Many thanks for your assistance. Mary E. Montgomery 49300 Avenida Fernando La Quinta 92253 TO: LaQuinta City Council Members RE: Proposed Project: NE Corner of Washington & Avenue 50 We urge the City Council NOT to approve this project for the following reasons: • At 252 units, some 3-story (and without elevators), this proposed development is too dense for the surrounding neighborhoods. (Without the so-called "Density Bonus", code for developing this property is 177 units.) • With 522 parking spaces, traffic on Avenue 50 is sure to increase significantly, resulting in less safety and increased noise and light pollution, thus impairing quality of life and, in some cases, interrupting view corridors of existing residents. • The proposed height of the three-story units is 28 feet, six feet or 27% above the 22- foot code. • There are questions about the whether the proposed development compromises the safety of children who attend the nearby Middle School and Boys & Girls Club, located at Moon River Drive. Many of these children walk, roller blade or ride their bikes to/from school. The safety situation is exacerbated by the U-turns at Eastbound Avenue 50 and the Park/Moon River intersection that will be required to access the proposed property. • The property is owned by a company in Oregon; the developer is in Costa Mesa with little vested interest in preserving the quality of life that we have come to enjoy as LaQuinta residents. We agree that development this vacant property is inevitable and can be a positive for the City. BUT it can and should be developed in a manner that maintains the charm, style and serves to preserve the peace and view corridors of LaQuinta, as other developments in or near Old Town have achieved to good effect. Chip & Brett Benner 77470 Loma Vista Todd & Michelle Biersack 78490 Calle Remo Sarah Blaisdell 50665 Cypress Point Drive Steve Bock 78983 Breckenridge Drive Tim Carlson 78775 Grand Traverse Ruth Cottingame 50225 Grand Traverse Avenue Diane Crystal & Jack Scott 50857 Cereza Christina & Leo Coulourides 48905 El Nido Kathryn Evenson & Charles Edwards 50565 Grand Traverse Sally Farwell 50505 Spyglass Hill Drive Doug Fascenelli 78971 Indian Wood Ct Larry Garcia 50740 Grand Traverse Holly & Jay Jensen 78074 Lago Kathy Jones 78943 Breckenridge Drive Janet Kennedy 78903 Breckenridge Drive Victoria Lindsey 78999 Breckenridge Drive Grant Maples 78730 Castle Pines Drive Debbie Marquez 50425 Grand Traverse David & Mirella Mesrobian 78785 Castle Pines Cheryl Nelson 50800 Grand Traverse John Peterson 78340 Toronja Jeffrey & Christy Quiggle 78015 Lago Leslie & Shannon Ransdall 49970 Coachella Drive Susan & William Reveal 50245 Grand Traverse Ann & Art Rundle 78835 Castle Pines Barbara Sirna 78044 Calle Norte Mike Sidley Leticia Gonzalez 49400 Avenida Club La Quinta Patricia Sidley 49415 Avenida Club La Quinta Maureen Skeese 50115 Doral Street Doug & Dianna Smith 50440 Spyglass Hill Drive Anne Smith 78740 Castle Pines Drive Tim Wallender 78645 Castle Pines Ruth Waytz 78477 Calle Orense Nancy Weinberger 78680 Castle Pines Nanette & Michael Wobber 78805 Grand Traverse From: Sandy Robbins <sandy@sandyrobbins.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 11:58 AM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Letter for City Council Meeting 8/1 EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Good morning, Ms. Flores, Attached is my letter for the City Council for their review regarding the La Quinta Apartment complex up for discussion at tonight's meeting. This message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information and are only for the use of the intended recipient of this message. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email, and delete or destroy this and all copies of this message and all attachments. Any unauthorized disclosure, use, distribution, or reproduction of this message or any attachments is prohibited and may be unlawful. July 31, 2023 Dear Ms. Flores and Members of the City Council; I am writing to you today regarding the proposed development of La Quinta Village apartments (formerly Troutdale Apartments). I have several significant concerns regarding this project in the proposed location of Washington/50th. 1. The project only has seven guest parking spots. The neighboring homes on Saguaro Road, Bottlebrush Drive, Date Palm, and Sagebrush Avenue will be significantly impacted by visitors visiting their friends and family and potentially overflowing parking from residents. The adjacent homes on Saguaro Road, Bottlebrush Drive, Date Palm, and Sagebrush Avenue should not have to endure the burden of the overflow parking from the proposed La Quinta Village apartments, nor should the neighboring homes have to get a parking permit from the City of La Quinta to be able to park in front of their own home. The project should be designed with adequate guest parking. The Developer should eliminate their outdoor recreational areas or cut back on the number of units being built and provide more guest parking for the development. 2. The ingress and egress off of Washington is an inferior access for the proposed project. Cars traveling south on Washington will have to make a U-turn or go completely around on 48th to Jefferson to 50th then back to Washington since there is a no U-turn sign at Washington/50th. This will cause a tremendous traffic backup during school traffic hours on 50th 3. The Traffic study was completed in April 2023. The traffic study was not conducted during the busiest time of the season. Most snowbirds go home after the winter season is over on April 1 of each year. The new traffic will not reflect the accuracy of how many cars travel Washington and 50th daily. The new traffic study should be made available to the public 72 hours before the Planning or City Counsil meeting tomorrow. As I write this letter to you, the new traffic study is unavailable on the Developer's website. The Developer's website is currently down and not working. 4. Environmental report and assessment - The proposed development is adding approximately over 1500 car daily traffic patterns and the environment. Has a new study and assessment been completed to see the impact of the air and noise on neighboring homes? A new study should be completed since the project has changed. 5. The building project height of the buildings is higher than allowed by the City of La Quinta zoning ordinance. The architecture is different from the surrounding homes in the area. The height of the buildings looks into the neighboring houses and yards on Saguaro Road. 6. The neighboring homes on Saguaro Road have to look at the 1 Oft wall from their backyards. There is nothing aesthetically pleasing about looking at a blank wall of nothing. 7. Water - How does the City of La Quinta plan to handle the new contract between the State of California and the Fed's to reduce the amount of water the State of California receives from the Colorado River with this new development? 8. The current power grid cannot handle the new development and will require an upgrade. At who's expense? This project is adverse development for the surrounding homes and schools, including resale value, traffic, safety for bicyclists and pedestrians, and environmental impacts. This property would be better suited for one-two story senior development, or single-family homes would be a better fit for this property. Thank you for your time in reviewing my letter and concerns. Yours truly, Sandy Robbins 2 CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM MEETING DATE: �( A Please give this completed form to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. This farm is to assure accuracy in prepanng the minutes as to spewing of names and addresses, as well as to allow staff to fallow -up an requests made hg mernbers of the public. Completion of this form is voluntary_ Once submitted to the City Clerk, this form becomes a public record. Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Retry No.: Subject: r L Support �Ppose :] Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcornes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETINIX PROTOCOL.- PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WI L CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Councilmembers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: Speaker Identification: Name JC, �blcC� Address ii c Organization/Business Phone _T 0— k e-mail YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about m etings & events. Visit the City's website for more information: www.LaQ.uintaCA.gov ITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM MEETING DATE: { Please give this completed form to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. This farm is to ass4ire accuracy in preparing the minutes as to speuing of names and addresses, as well a$ to allow staff to tcliow-op on requests made by members of the puhNc. completion of this form is voluntary. Once submitted to the City Clerk, this form becomes a public record. J Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.: Subje t. _ . [.f � u Support Oppose 0 Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (riot Councilmembers or staff or audience) do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: Speaker Idi tification: Name'. Address � 4 Organization/Business Phone e-mail YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive ennails about elletings & events. Visit the City's website for more information: www.La uintaCA. av -----Original Message ----- From: Kelly Scannell <kellyscannell1 @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 2.25 PM To: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: Troutdale Residences written comments [You don't often get email from kellyscannell1 @gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear Cheri, My husband, Bob, and I live in Montero Estates, the neighborhood in La Quinta directly across the street on Washington for the proposed Troutdale project. We listened to the public hearings and have some serious concerns with the project as proposed. We are concerned about the following: 1. Density for that property 2. Traffic with only one lane on 50th Ave and only one entrance on Washington. 3. Noise for the increase in traffic and for the addition of so many homes 4. The design is nothing like anything else on Washington after you cross Hwy 111 5. Where will excess parking be for visitors to the apartments We appreciate that the property will be developed but ask that the city consider the above. In addition, please consider the impact on the Montero community specifically. We exit out the gate on Washington and make a u-turn on Sagebrush. The addition of hundreds of cars will make crossing multiple lanes dangerous. The alternative is to go back down to 50th to make a u-turn which will only add to the potential increased congestion from the new residences. While the developer claimed to have contacted the neighborhoods that would be impacted, no one in our neighborhood has yet been contacted by the developer of the planned project. Thank you for taking our concerns into consideration. Kelly and Bob Scannell 49495 Avenida Monte Sent from my iPad Monika Radeva From: Tania Flores Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:18 PM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Danny Castro; Cheri Flores Subject: FW: Ave 50/Washington Opposition Letter Attachments: I M G_0002.pdf Please see attached public comment letter regarding the La Quinta Village Apartments. I have not sent a response. CIA1.1FOESNIA Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores(a_)LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov From: Jim Schmidt <jim@sunterraonline.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:14 PM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Ave 50/Washington Opposition Letter You don't often get email from jim@sunterraonline.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. 1 To La Quinta City Council RE: Ave 50 and Washington Dear Council, I am writing to day to express my opposition} to the purposed La Quinta Village Apartments on Ave 50 and Washington in La Cluinta. I have been a resident here for over 25 years and do not feel that this is the right project for this location; I attended all the planning committee meetings in person aed was pleased to find out the most on the committee had the sarne cflncerns as myself and many others its the community. As a result, the agreed not to recommend this project to full council. My main objections are the following: Two and Three story apartments to do fit in with this community of mostly single family homes. I am guessing from third floor you could see in other surroundings homes? The architecture does not match the surrounding area. The traffic is bad now and will only get worse with project adding some additional 1500 da0y trips. Car pass at 50 plus mp} now and we have two schools close by. Lots of children walking around this intersection. View obstruction for many longtime residents near Sage Brush, not fair. Increased noise and Ilght. Others and I realize something will eventually he developed on this lot. This is simply not the right project. One site that was discussed was Washington and Fred Waring which is surrounded by 2 story buildings, This is the corridor to South La Quita and should be considered a prime location to celebrate our beautiful city. Sincerely, Z Jim Schmidt —President Casitas 1 HOA, Montero Estates LQ CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM MEETIfG DATE: 1 / Please give this completed form to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. This form fs to assure accuracy in preparing the minutes as to spelling of names arrd addresses, as well as to allow staff to follow-up on requests made by members of the public. Completion of this form is voluntary. Once submitted to the City Clerk, this form becomes a public record. J Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.: Subject: . 1 Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: . The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration Q SupportX--Pppose and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING RROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Councilmembers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: f~ � e r, Speaker Identification: 4 Name Ad d ress Organ ization/Business Phone e-mail Z v �ti YES, I wish to subscribe to the City"s "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetings & events. Visit the City`s website for more information: www.L,aQuintaCA.gov From: Ellen Way <nuts4ag@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 8:34 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Public Comment - La Quinta Village Apartment Proposal Attachments: LQ Village Apartments Opposition Letter.docx EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. La Quinta City Clerk's office, Thank you for incorporating the attached public comment letter into the August 1, 2023 City Council meeting public record. The letter is regarding Item #2 under Public Hearing, La Quinta Village Apartment proposal. Kindest regards, Mike and Ellen Way July 30, 2023 The Honorable Linda Evans, Mayor The Honorable Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tern The Honorable Kathleen Fitzpatrick The Honorable Deborah McGarrey The Honorable John Pena Dear La Quinta City Council Members: My name is Ellen Way, my home is located at 49500 Rancho San Francisquito in the Talante development of La Quinta. I am writing regarding Public Hearing Item #2, 252-Unit Apartment Project, La Quinta Village Apartments, on the Tuesday, August 1, 2023, City Council agenda. My husband and I have been residents of La Quinta since 1992. We have owned our home and raised our two daughters in the Talante Community for the past 20 years. We understand that affordable housing is needed in our community. We moved here as young adults and we experienced first-hand the challenge of finding affordable housing. We support genuine efforts to build affordable housing, we just don't believe this project is being proposed in the right location and the rental prices are not affordable to the people who need them most. We oppose this project for the following reasons: 1. The traffic congestion that this development will create on Washington Street and Avenue 50 will severely impact everyone in the surrounding area. We understand the traffic study for this proposal was completed during the pandemic and does not accurately calculate the current traffic congestion in this area. Tenants driving south on Washington will have to make a U-turn at Avenue 50 to enter the complex, which will also cause increased congestion. 2. This development is located near a sports complex, two schools, and a Boys & Girls Club which together create a great deal of traffic congestion in this area. We believe there is also a safety concern adding more cars to an area where parents are parking, delivering/picking-up children, and children are walking to and from the facilities. 3. We believe that for people who truly need affordable housing to live in this development there is the possibility that more people will live in the complex than is projected, therefore, increasing the number of cars driving in and out and parking in the development. This project is simply too large for this parcel of land. The developer is trying to do too much with 14 acres and the density is too great for this small corner of our community. If we are really going to tackle the affordable housing issue, then we must build truly affordable housing. We thank you for considering our comments and we hope you will vote NO on this proposal. Kindest regards, Mike and Ellen Way 49500 Rancho San Francisquito, La Quinta From: Tania Flores Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 11:01 AM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Cheri Flores Subject: FW: Irwin Partners hearing RE: Washington and Ave 50 (APN 646-070-016 Importance: High Good morning Clerks, Please see public comment received regarding La Quinta Village Apartments. Thank you. CALIFORNIA Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores(a)LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov From: Ruth Waytz <rwaytz@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 5:24 PM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Irwin Partners hearing RE: Washington and Ave 50 (APN 646-070-016 EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello - My name is Ruth Waytz and I live in Montero Estates, across from the proposed apartments at Washington and Avenue 50. 1 have attended the Planning Commission meetings and voiced my opposition to this terrible project. I'm grateful the planning commission decided not to recommend this project go forward. There are so many problems! I'm not sure which I think is the most serious, so this is a random order. Traffic Contrary to what the developer claims, traffic will be dramatically increased at and and near this corner for several reasons. The entry gate can accommodate only three cars, meaning we will frequently see traffic backed up onto the streets. Access will require a massive increase in U-turns, which are already incredibly dangerous. The developer said something like 10 additional U-turns per day. 500 residents and only 10 people leaving the house per day? Wrong. And insulting. Mention was made of widening of Avenue 50 as part of the proposed bridge project. I know you know that project could take six years to complete and hasn't even started. The developer is acting as if Avenue 50 already has that extra lane. It doesn't. Architectural style I know they claim they revised the style and now it's "Mediterranean," but it still looks like glorified storage units or a Residence Inn to me. It's a giant eyesore and it doesn't look like anything else anywhere around it. I'm not sure how that piece of land got rezoned, but everything around it is low density. Everything. I know the developer knocked back their request from high density to medium high, but that is still way more than our neighborhood can tolerate. One of the speakers at one of the planning commission meetings treated us to a lovely history of the historic architectural style of La Quinta. This project does not fit in with our style and theme. It's big, cheap, and ugly. Further, the development still has three-story buildings, inadequate parking, and no elevators. This is a hazard for older or disabled residents, as well as anybody who might want to move a piece of furniture into their apartment. In the last planning commission meeting, the developer flat out admitted the elevators would have been too expensive. What other safety corners are they cutting? Low income/affordable housing Much has been said about this, and the City's mandate to add affordable housing — but this isn't that! This complex will not have low income housing. Its lower priced units are roughly 600 ft.' and about $2000 a month. I don't know where that counts as affordable housing, but those prices are not low and I don't think you could get a roommate in a 600 square -foot apartment. Irwin Partners This developer is already notorious for breaking/ignoring laws. This is a very slippery slope. Dealing with someone whose response to being made aware of the law and still deliberately breaking it is, "so sue me" is less than ideal. Power station Yes, we could use a new Power Station, and this complex absolutely cannot exist on the current grid. But this expansion is no gift, and I'm not willing to let the developer ruin our neighborhood with promises that benefit IID and the city like someone jangling car keys to distract a baby. NIMBY I'm aware of the objections to our objections, stating something is going to be developed on that corner, no matter what, and that anyone opposed is a "Karen" or a crybaby. I'm certain that corner will be developed, but we have an obligation to the city of La Quinta and its residents to maintain our quality of life and aesthetics. This is just the wrong project for this corner. I know you're going to get lots more letters that go into more detail. I never seem to be able to think of everything when I sit down to write, but I want my opinion recorded and counted. I will be attending the meeting on August 1. Thank you for your time and consideration, Ruth (Turns out this phone isn't full of candy after all.) ITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM MEETING CRATE: 2, 1 1 Please give this completed form Ito the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. This form rs to assure accuracy in preparing the minutes as to speinng of narnes and addresses, as well as to allow staff to follow-up on requests made by members of the public. Completion of this form is voluntary. Once submitted to tixe City Clerk, this farm becomes a pbb#c record. [] Matters LISTED on the Agenda _P4 Agenda Item No.: .y - Subject: lid. 4 l D Support 4 Oppose Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda! your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING TIME MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY {not Councilmembers or staff or audience) I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Council to consider: h . f. Clk wAl ++} JJ lJ { i 'y_ * ( 1 Speaker Identifiatioln Name Address v1 Organization/Business _ Phone _ e-mail H YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetings & events. Visit the Cit's website for more information: vaww.La uint CA. ov HAND OUTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 1, 2023 - PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 HANDOUT BY RESIDENT THOMAS EMISON - PHOTOS FROM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOR LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS lid Lot b Lot 18 Lot 8 Lot 24 Lot 20 .IK Lot 14 Lot 15 Lot 23-24 Lot 2' Of i Lot 17 Lot 22 Lot 23 From Lot 22 looking west CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LETTER TO COUNCIL RE: PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OVERFLOW PARKING Now I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S August 1, 2023 City Council City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 RE: La Quinta Village Apartments — Parking Management Plan for Overflow Parking To Whom It May Concern: This letter serves as Parking Management Plan ("PMP") for the proposed La Quinta Village Apartments project ("Project") located at NEC of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta, California. This letter estimates potential parking needs associated with the Project and identifies PMP measures to ensure adequate parking is provided for employees, residents, and guests of the Project. Project Location/Description The La Quinta Village Apartments project is located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50. There are two entrances into the gated community: the primary entry is off Washington Street, while a secondary, resident -only entry is off Avenue 50. The Project consists of 252 units, which includes market -rate and moderate -income affordable units. Parking for the Project is provided per the City's Density Bonus Section, which is consistent with State Housing Law and Government Code Section 65915. The development includes 522 total parking spaces. Although only 295 parking spaces are required for the dwelling units per La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.60.260(K), 515 parking spaces are proposed. The types of parking provided are as follows: 0 7 dedicated parking spaces for the Clubhouse 0 515 total remaining parking spaces: o 166 parking spaces for 1-Bedroom units (1 space per unit) CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LETTER TO COUNCIL RE: PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OVERFLOW PARKING N E� I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 0 172 parking spaces for 2-Bedroom units (2 spaces per unit) 0 119 parking spaces for Guests (0.5 spaces per unit) 0 56 Standard Garage Spaces 0 2 Accessible Garage Spaces The Project will implement a Parking Pass system for its residents, guests, and employees. The Parking Pass system will help regulate parking and visitors. Parking Management Plan The following may be implemented to help ensure the adequacy of on -site parking for the Project: A. Valet Services For special occasions such as major/holiday events, valet services will be provided to manage on -site parking. The property management company will engage a professional valet service company for special event parking. B. Parking Program During Major Holidays and Off -Site Parking The community plans well in advance for major holidays and increased visitors on those days. When needed, the property management company will direct associates and guests to utilize public transportation and nearby parking lots such as those at the La Quinta Sports & Youth Center. Needing this extra parking is not anticipated to occur but it is useful to have for the rare overflow parking occasions. The plans include: o Securing offsite temporary parking in nearby parking lots such as the La Quinta Sports & Youth Center O The community will either shuttle visitors from the parking location to the community and back and/or hire valet service to bring cars to the off -site parking area. Conclusion Based on the above, we conclude that the proposed supply of 522 on -site spaces will be adequate in meeting the Project's total parking needs. CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LETTER TO COUNCIL RE: PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OVERFLOW PARKING PI PA E IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this Parking Management Plan. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call us at (714) 557-2448 Sincerely, Greg I rwy,+ti Greg Irwin, Partner IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS 245 Fischer Ave., Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 CD "4AilPT 3 a 4 yy� �• 1 ...1CIO` IA-1 f i1CAA +. ram, r1 � � . �� 4 .�'. �;>�,� 1Al s ` + q Sa� +Gruff nee ; r • { 4 , r# 9ottl�ushsL7r a■k ; BMW La Duinta Middle 5�ag� asPa k• ' csq `�•:� r i 40 5chbot'5tem�R'cademy • f 11��.r�. y, � •�mily�Ym''Ir.-a � �-_ r D f. of the'i�e er't' sa die ff *c r two ' A orip Google Earth Imagery date: 11/6/22 "" �� � fI'Y 1 700 ft Camera: 5,404 Ft 33"41'14'N 116°17'23''W 51 ft CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. PROJECT DATA SHEET INDEX T1 Tiger NE CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET 6 AVENUE 50 - 6 . F6wR5 PaRLCI NUYaFR — ILVIL 646-01DQ16 _ "' C1 CIVIL SITE PLAN y C2 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN O6sCRIPnDN _ �i�lra ��� C3 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 1364 ACRES MIL IN POR LOT 1 ME 023099 DESERT CLUB MANOR TR 2 Ld 15uediveipn _. C4 HYDROLOGY MAP AND PRELIMINARY WOMP Neme DESERT CLUB MANOR TR 2 Ame 013 Bd MIL LMType LRI Rac M1Wp Type Map Bauk - lid Map PW B B23 Map Plel P 099 Podicn Ld Podion — M R IRA a ARCHITECTURAL SCOPE ton WORK ell L Al Sde Plan PRO POSED 2 AND 3 STORYAPARTMENT BUILDINGS WITH CLUBHOUSE -GARAGES, --- a. _ A2 Frsl Floc Plan CARPORTS POOL, AND COMMUNITY SPACES AND NECESSARY HARDSCAPE AND IANOSLAPE , t A3 Second Flop Plan , A4 Third Floor Plan PgOPOc b ...p .%eN}A A/ARi %Sa , AS Roof Plan •+[ Y~ AS Unif Pang aS�..DAT! EXISTING ZONING RLD1•I,LeI)0111090NDENGTY RESIDENTIAL - Il ■ i - - A7 CMbllolse (9-12UTATSPERACRE) - R- - e �9 - All Bkg 7-EMvaBpXs INCLUDES AFFORGABLE DENT'BONUS OVERUY 1 Z. _ Ali Bog 2-EMva lbrla PROPO$EO S]TIVIG RM-MMEHDNSI'RSIDET '- - ' All) Bldg 3-Elmaaare (b12UNIT5 PERACRE) WIT DENSITY BONUS -SEE PROJECT INFO BELOW r All BMg 3-Etevafions SITE AREA 611,14605E I1403 ACRES 1 .H� Al2 Bldg. 4-Elesations BUILDING FOOTPRINT N,06a SF MAX. LOT COVERAGE 60%OF NETLOTAREA=3666660E SF .� •-3 A13 Bldg 5-EBvalions LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED 036%=205.6155F A14 Bldg. 6-Etevaliens TO TALBUILDINGAREA 2511,199 SF - A Bldg. 7-Ebvatlons TOTAL PROPSED DWELLING UNITS 252 UNITS I212970 SF A16 Bldg. B-Elevations A17 Bldg• 9- Ell.Mcns WI, COMIWN pRENAREAUffO{%Rm. W%OFNETPROJECTAREA=IB].31401SF _�� _ A1B BMg. 10-Eleva,i_ "wNQI OPEN AAE,APAM1190: 346%=2tt,a625F .r -- - ��- A19 Bldg_ 11-Elev lions ACTIVE RECREATION AREA REQUIRED: W% OF COMMON OPEN AREA REQUIRED =550035E ACTIVE RECREATIONAREA PROVIDED: 01.1%= 51,t 10 SF f • 1+ A21 3D Viev+slevalions S A23 Board 3D WBws 6 MRagrals, MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK: 20'-0- '• A23 Lille of Sight Diagrams MINI MUM INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK: A24 Site Sections 61INIMUM EXTERIOR 5IDE YARD SETBACK: lgd MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK' 15'� �+/ IA. _ _ + ' A25 SAa Sections MIN PERIMETER LANDSCAPE SETBACK tv-0- - � > A26 SHe Seclions AVG PERIMETER LANDSCAPE SETBACK.- M IK NO OF STORIESALLOWED PER RMH ZONING: 2 -"SEE SPECIFIC PLAN— y5. _ - J■Z PERU El(HIBR]B: ELECTRICAL l-M CNERALPUN, PsdsSEDONX•IMAGAGE C TOR AVENUV,WuHISo STREET AVENUEFO SECONDARYIMDRSETI ' _ E1 0 Site LWhUng Plan IMAGE CIX3RIOOR SETBACK: 150-0 CK: E1-1 Sile Lighting Plan AI,LOWAOLE BLll0 w ahR'AT IMAGECDit. =V [NinP47Cx1 AT6A'+SIelS sq El2 Site Pholomeldc Plan -"SEE SPECIFIC PUN FORADD INFO"' - - E7 3 Sri, Pholomeldc Plan ETA Light Fixture Gun Sheets CCCUPAUCV R 2 PNO B ON CONSTRUCTION TY TYPE: TYPEV-A E V-A i?NDSGAPE SPRINKLERS: l.£ pd 1ve'>1' Bn WFPA 13I LP-1 Conceptual Landscape Plan ALLONABLE BUILDING HEIGHT PER RMH ZONING: '•SE=_ 32eIUFC 3JYT"• LP-2 Typical Bulldilg Planing Exhibit PR OPOSEDBUILDINGHEIGHTATCLUBHOUSE: 19-(Y LP-3 SMpe PIan91g Exhibit PRO P0SEDBUILDIH3HEIGITTAT2-STORYBLDGS: 27'-6' - LP-0 Pool Area PRPPSEO FpUe_OINO.KEIGHT AT Y 1rCFITBLDCG 3H'E• LP-5 Entry VITTH ffita DaLfFn�Alla a1m_OIR� cave e LP-6 Conceptual Wall & Fame Plan I PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING CALCULATIONS VICINITY MAP PROJECT TEAM UNIT MIX Common Area CakuleUone ParMng Gla Unk Type Unit Name Bone City Am, (SF) Total (SF) Area (SF) CRY 1 N Ee l i1D6 ~ CWVNER t-Bed mr.hent to-ADA 1 29 673 19.517 1, First Floor ADA 6 ADA=P.COSSIBIE STANDARD PA RG5R1[EIFX,)aSNSU PER LQMC 9.(A.260(K)BY-RIGHTPARKINGINCENOVE, THE '. - ' •1 Troutdale Village, LLC 1300 BMnkenship Rd, Suite 325 t-BBtl Apartment to -STD 1 31 673 20,863 CLUBHOUSE RE�DENTACTiUjF1' 97B FOLOWINGPAAKING RATIOSSHAUL—TOTHEENTIRE ADA VAN 2 ADA Von'=AC[iS51ME VAN PAAONG SPACE (9 %19)4FADLL r WBDI Linn, Oregon 9706E 1-Bed Apartment 18-ADA 1 41 755 33,220 Fire Riser MECHANICAL 12 DEVELOPMENT OND-DOING MARKET -RATE UNITS) C Z6 L C IFu.'FP.wr:Ng • 'S IF] T:(503)807A652 1-Bed Apadmed 18-STD 1 62 USES GYM RESOE))T ACT7y1TV 725 • ErLS'X ]-eR UNITS: ]SPACE PE0. UNIT REQUIRED 'Al Jeff Parker 32,640 2-Bed Apanmed 2A•ADA 3: 34 960 32,640 HALL CIRCULATION 166 LC 9 CC=COVFAm COMPACT PAaDHG SVA^�(35'%17.5) 2-&t UNITS: 1.5 SPACES PER MR REQUIRED - 2-Betl Apartment 2A-STD 2 52 960 49,920 HK SERVICE 3fi CP 281 d=COVERED STANDARD PARKING SPACE try % IF) ARCHITECT InMn Parlhars Architects 336 252 202,970 eq It office ADMINISTRATION 290 FEV 50 7'Y4-ppr CJ Mau -'If wpc la "I Earn -++ten --w 245 Fischer Avenua, Sul. B2 POeI RETENTION BASIN 1.343 LE CCVEAEF, STANDARD PARKING SPACES: 9211—2 RV ova) FEVADA 1 FEVADA,=FIIIUPE EVADAP NGSPACE s'%IF) +SABUN Corda Mesa, CA M26 0139$rrr CALCO(_ATTON$ Pod Dad TERRACE ],094 UNCOVERED COMPACT PARKING 5RADE5: 2B 01o1de a T1V e.v1 FEV VAN 1 FEV VAN=FUTURE EV VAN PARKING SPADE l9'X l9)aC AWE T: 714-557-2448 IN: —h,acc corn BASE DENSITY:1003ACREBa 12 UNIT&ACRE=IRS BASE UNITS P-1 Equip MECHANICAL 166 UNCOVERED ACCESSISLE PARKING SPADES: 60,a,If13mee11 G 57 G=GARAGE STANDARD PAAAGNG SPACE X W) Sherry Braun TOTAL UNITS PROPOSED: 252 UNITS RR REBTRODMB 124 CARPORT STANDARD PARKING SPACES: 330IIb'� x ip mKnl Mel 1 MAIL =DESIGNATED MAIL VAN PARKING YADE(9'%19') CARPORT —PACTpA1WNG SPADES: 4Un4ub OfN nml CIVIL SD%DENSITYBONUSIS BEINGPROPOSED maa Shr RESTROOMS 68 PAR ACCESSIBLE P 91 P=SIANDMSDP0uhMGE[FXI9)(9MI7) CARIORT KING SPADES: 411rden RflV e+aasl Egan Civil, Inc 4 03 ACRES. 16 UNIT&ACRE a 252 PROPOSED UNITS Spa RETENTION BASIN 93 GARAGE STANDARD PARKING SPADES: 560N,eIs I TN ARKx) Sp2 42945 Madio Street, Suite A FOR50%DENSITY BDNU644% OF NEED TO BE MODERATE INCOME UNITS BASED ON Slor SERVICE ill D1r" �" `- - I�.wX- -- ndio,CA92201 DE PERCENTAGES LOMC 9 80160 DENSITY BONVS PERCENTAGES Wet Bar CIRCULATION 36 TOTAL SPACESaI 522 (IN,Oe 5] Fv RKnI T: (760) 404-7663 W: egandvil com 44%a 16B= 74 MODERATE INCOME UNITS WH MECHANICAL 12 Staven Egan, Project Designer MARKET -RATE UNITS 176 UNIT MIX AS PERCENTAGES: 11,H4egN NOTE: LQMC 960,IN(K)BY-RIGHT PARMNG INCENTIVE AND PARKING RATIOS APPLY TO THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT MODEPAT£Ir+r_CLE TINT^ ]4 IN 1AED M TS p,5 a7%yr,2 1 '66�A!J]lRaT5fY 1]%dJsz UlRpl (NOT RESTRICTED TO ONLY AFFORDABLE UNITS) PARKING RATIOS PER LQNC 9.60260 ARE USTED ABOVE He"mMnn Desig ARCHITECT Im, TOTALMRS 253 252TOTALUNIIS Ueim0y Cr Me .M lh.'Arfm vnetarl-Fairs:ea"'l. st^^ePr alF arITS1 1161- LINNSa15PKF/UNRREQUIRED :116 77899 Wolf Road, Suite 102 City Anne ton TOM (AFj 622-BR UNITS. 15 SPACEyUNR REWIRED. 93 Paan Dosed, CA 2211 MAPoLEr4bATE UNITS PROVIDED: MODERATE INCOME UNITS PROVDED: 11fi tAE3 UNITS ST%d]4 UNYf5) FMD F40G M(MIFRATF nmc; SO TAR UNRSaI SYACF/U1lIT REQUIRED : 50 T: 760-777-9131 Sp1-BED VNITS (6T 1]_REDlnNIT MLaDU17r1ISI�-y TA IIT_1 Be.loony 29 61 1.769 293-SIR UNITS a 1.5 SPADE&IINIT REQUIREDe 36 LamduHIDLOA IL I PACE PEA 300 EFDF GRASS RDORARSA W: hd g-i-pop Jose Eslmda, VP, Poled Manager 170 TOTAL MARKET RATE UNITS PROVO 74 TOTAL MODERATE INCOME UNITS PROVD Belmlry 34 66 2.244 SYn Yrl t'dAR s Saloon, 44 60 2,640 TOTALSPADESREQUIRED:' 302� ELECTRICAL Oren tJyeall Anse 5r 111W1¢ng Ale. 107 6,653 p'R TOTALSPA6ESPROVIDED: 522 3 249 Leopard Street, 5ugetA-101 PITH {5F] Area.076 Second Floor Palm Dosed, CA 92211 Bldg 01 (2-STIXLT 10,667 l%Jp DS {7•SIT3eX) 14,076 Balcony 29 61 1,]69 NOTE: NOT REQUIRED PER LQMC g.I.(K).-RIGHT PARKING INCENTIVE T:(7r70)983-2007 W: w1WY Yronec mm Bldg O: (3.5rWy1 15,521 Bldg 02 I2 oldi 1P.79a Belcory 34 B6 2,244 UDIL4 PROVIDED: 396 COVERED 115 UNCOVERED P rd4NL: rry rE PxmO��DrrwF£s TI dr Victor Leon, PE, PdndlBl BRIgg3 ()-rr ,Y) 211 5ugl II7 �t[DgY) 3i �t6 Slaty 44 60 2,640 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 29E COVERED + 124 UNCOVERED = 522 TOTAL Bldg 04 [1L]3I0AIZ 21— B3tg Qa I2S}STDRT 36TIN 1D7 6,653 eqK NOTE: ADA AND FEV PARKING IS INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL PARKING COUNT was R•r;Tdi 12.314 'SM005 (R•STOAs) 1BA45 Third Floor a" Go pdT[ 1A.Sw *dBx (!9T(m1') 2.1,ao9 Balcony 2 61 122 eK ruesem nlunM -` BIdpC7 0,STOarl ZI,755 Bldg 07 D-STIXtY) 27.430 B6:_ la SO 1,OB0 035 TOTAL PARKING SPACES 522 TOTAL PARKING SPACES 522 SHIXIT-TERM WHIP I^ OF TOTAL PARKING SPACES 522 Is♦pvls0oa MenG) BWGDa (3-STORy) 27.983 Bldg OB D-STORY) 34,131 Bolmny la 66 1,1BB 2%OFSISASSIGNEDPAAKING SPACES 103 LONG-TERM O-N/A Bldg Ll (3-STOP,) 12,906 OWO09 (2-STOAT 16.114 3S 2,390 eqR TOTAL HC SPACES REQ'D II RRURE EV SPACES REQ'D 53 MR REQ O, No 1. OR I40aETENAVT-OCCUPANTS Bldg 10 (2-ST1RY) 12,664 Bldg 10 (2-STORY) 16.225 752 15,686 sqN FUTURE BY SPACES PROVIDED 53 5% OF 7 UNASSIGNED PARKING SPACES 035 NIN BICYCLE PARKING REQD 2 11 (2-STORY) 13,717 BWg 11 (2-STORY) 17.163 TOTAL HC SPADES RE AD 1 TOTAL nCYC1E PAEUOr4g PROVED 4 Id, bhouse (1-s1oRY) 2,680 Clubhouse p-STORY) 3.226 Fir. Rleen Coun[ ADA CAR SilD 10 9 �my FW%Lq.CUOFSIRT'DEITPFEN71tart Pod Equip (1-STONy) 186 Pod Equip D.STORY) 206 VD/ AM. 15F) T" ISFi ADA VAN SPACES READ 1 RECTRIFAL'+3DRE N o"I" EQLRImaNT 1E3E). TOTAL ADA SPACES PRovIDED 12 lRTErd;%lD TO 00,6,SUATE P2t]xCTS CePAOUST,k 2. '1 eq R 256,196 eq R F R 11 5 66 WACIIY FOR FACILITATTNG FUTURE EV (NARGING a ReF41 GrvAT s111Awu4elNXUltb AeM RIt71e11'A :"'„4 :fFr7aSYwu{sam Y10A5 Fire Riser 1 12 12 uO RFtf111RFMFWFOREVSPACEi TOMCOM1STRUCTE00R AVAIUBLE UNTIL EV CHARGERS AKE INSTALLED FOR USE aM1mXG NOT pnn0m wTTH SVRRWNaING WADS IF WRNTH NOM20NTAL PAmEC11aN p00T0RFLODR Aabh (IXOUSfh pVTM SHAFTS AND [W RATS) 12 100 eq R MCI PA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Title A R c H T E D T B Troutdale Village, LLC. T1 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 245 Fischer Avenue, Sulle B•2 Costa Me60 CA 92626 (714)5572446 Y7 Ipaoccom La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: l26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BE Garages.pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS _ r I I ki=d �� L� � --I LJ O c0'� I " ---•-- I I-�J�.FrY L,�[ i.. JI 15�'La': - . � . ,r :� - �°+SL �=_: y- ' -a ," - oau3�- -- - - �A�Ear - - -=-winMfe - - eawrar- - �AnAx - - -• e�awr _ _ • . y _ rvl�zc i4F - 7 h:r_ •{• • _ - f - �_ - - _ - � _ eAwcr - �.tuae - eaaAar -altaAeE - roadlce� •t • _ L Lj mj- {�..:f-- mourn.:� + _•i {: i R �{ ,, �^TRA6N 1 .I. �s sro r j :'I • 1 1 1 A EI'�1:•."_ '•f. r1E R.xZ+- x. R,�. _ •,'r R•�-i • 7_ f. _� 27.5' I �' • m ; BLDG. 9 / 0 BLDG. 10 PAD=55.0 1 1 a9i N i' 31fi BLDG. 1 r PAD=51.5 _ PAD=53.5 2-BTORY11:UNITS 25TORY/ 16 UNITS-FOOTMNT-i GOMM SF PAQ=51.Q x wraaY l UNr s A iI I T YI,94NITS 10.7' F00TPReO'-1g000t SF _ - rF f - } 1 i�•. /: i99g9 I if I ! som,vnrr.Txa a- u BLDG. 11 - F-- • • - - - - - __ •1 :- PAD=53.0 -��, LL1 t36• MACE CCdiRfA7R iE1LH ..� _ _ .. .. — f - 2STORYI Ie UNRS w _ _ __ FO01➢ReR-e,OWe SF _ ' _ _ f ' 4�: -i a - _ - 6., _ PAD=54-5 T - Q-- - CLUB ... _- • . • . . _ ..- • . • _ • FoaTPaan _I-STORYb uwm sF .-.. .I I��y T/ '•} ,�1, HOUSE _ .. _ • _ _ _ 1 • . f >ti, - •T f� `�r �S -.�1' i a f U I - Ip :-3. _ _{ - - PAD=52.0 _ - - - •- _ . _ . _ _-, r:. �'"� 'g'yl>•: U i. :I BLDG.3 = -=" 1.1 '.ttI •.T•: - PAD=530 _� I' - �� �ey�i�j?� INi: T L,.L+ { LJlI -1_ - SSTORYIe6UNIT5 - 1S.h'• _ ��•J� 7�; %!� �1n LSD' I 1 � .s _ � - .. - FOOTFRP/r-1�,OGM Si - -• � . , i � - � }' ..•.:::: - - - - -i- r .. 1�1 • y1 �� BLDG. 4 1 ' BLDG 4-1 PAD=51.0 BLDG. 7 s '7 PAD=51.0 - PAD=53.0 ?l/ j 2-STORYI 12 UNITS FOOTPRBR-xSWeSF •C �`�' - eSTORY 124 UNITS FOOTGRINT-7.MSF • - tT10iiIWN1 •10 WOt SF - • ` A:.En ` . • :. �_� : i . rtle Rlsl+ oI6TTrU ry I '� •20' ,xi. � - - - ... - ---- :. �- � _�� f • r,.'� r/ � '- � = .. } j I` � ; 14 � • Tnisn' r�•� . =l `' i �� f� � �' i - �- �i i �r /' '` � I � i" •' •urt-.�a. � • _ it �. J � ' r * _. �L_- : :. . . _ •r1reWl.1." 31.Ei'` _ BLDG.6 . • . / % r •-•�. .L•�=-==_-.r:�. I� __ - RRO6T.eAsxl• BLDG. S - Y--' . PAD=52.0 .. m°rm.u.e° - PAD=50.5 i7' :E' 1: ° - 2STORYI ,e IrR,S ]STORY I2A UNITS FOOTPRWT-emSF FOOIVRPR-I1,oODt SF 4 _ - -_ •-. rTrrzl - _ 's'.•: -� � _-�n4t'433•E''" `I�;tiLM€ °_ _.- _ _ - - ��- 5' n- a ^ •car- _ FPaI - E-..r+.y.r..� t- �H- 1 - z. I�.aAlx_�Arrl - __�-.- IFI _----I�'J.----_ � --- _ . - • - c•_: _._.._. r.. - - TRAFF!$ LINE _ _ - •• _ - - .. .. - --- / . __ ...- -- TRAFFICLUE -•-4 __--___-___ _ __ _ _ __ - _-_ _ _�-. .-- - _ _ __-_ _ - ��_-- 77 _ __-- -- -- -77 94 U a0 EO 1E' ABBREVIATIONS C/L CENTERLINE TP TOP OF PAVEMENT SCALE: 1"=40' EG EXISTING GROUND TO TOP OF CURB FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING FS FINISH S.RFACE TW TOP OF WALL 58 WX 5-TAX (XX.XX) EXISTING ELEVATION SWALE PRINTED ON: 06/06/2023 J�� T" o CM amps / D EvanoN n2 v TO / DAI NWDn FT y�WK ohw REVISIONS � p tin4 Easrap APPROWD BY: PLAN cHECREo RY: IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ��11�� DE�IPTIOE TOP OF DM AT , ECR AS S*N ON T� GITY � RA� D RI�A� wO y� oA �r EGA N CIVIL. INC. SHEEN 1 STREET � FOR TIE IL6StIR OFFICE BUILDING, 9 9 OFF 9 ON FILE IN TIE rLA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS OFFICE OF Cm OGINSA OF THE CITY OF RkV 11IR 3E AS RAN NAHA E0600371 ^ y� �' i' �{ g Y 8? IA 1111 Cb 9i24�-1112 CIVIL OF DIAL 4� isaw�es� r,r�w.�o,vlLe�M DAM CIVIL SITE PLAN s�,EE,-S 3 BYOU DIG T•-IE S rR TAI: S,P.{Y AAE LASED a: TiE 0"o4 A "' N0. 7 070 a PRiiAiRC WIDER YME LIRECT 5UKRY9C. OF: '1 ! rnc;yNATE B>'Go 1c.5gj, -: E U.;:o,Tso [?xM As n� cxn NrxdEE v TRAFFIC C115- FILE NUMBER TOLL FREE 1-°J]-=Z-4133 TA, LAMM IRI ET.T: C�TIIi:'-'SL[ wE>DB-RriEWEH ICO 'I 5TATAeE I i .� AT LEAST Tel CA i -WM YOU DIG TAe� /H] Rh, PER RJIr.•u-•I VAESRY TwIm'' if THE ` �+ O'P81T ARa �rE 0f1 CALAF�� DATE: O6/06/202] WASHINGTON2 S7H\TA1Ff,��UE 50�� COMPLEX 92253 A nRl[ oll[E Rr IfGf7�.`12n 570'liE N2Trt rEP4A,Epi ATRA:! CODCk ISAPdL,]: BPi"I NORTH 7e 59• 'JS'41f• %IESE. BEN/r,UlEr OANICL CLAY R.O.E �OiP %EydWi➢ AND RECOMMEND ED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 84G-0TOL1J PUBLIC HE RING I,T�M NO.:? -J iOIVILLAG� APARTM , TS�i-Lj { +Ij{I, — W PIpyJIR L11E ia. - � :;G'St !'N L 1RDPEP" -I'F• � OMUOB- �ARAOe -' - - -tiA1ux - __ - eARAar - �Aetnee - - - To+MABe- - - - - eAroler -OAMOe - - OARAOB- --1;A1uee - - b.R.rr•- _��x_ e.• • -- . � . ��� � IL .DPI BLDG.9 v III 'I _ BLDG.10 PAD=55.0 ] -PA IF. oET,e.sa PAD=51.5 PAD=53.5 - 2.sTORY/1euNrts BLDG. 1 2 2-STORY 122 UNITS 25TORYI I6 UNRS I•••• FOOTPRINT-B OBDt SF - 1< 2STORYII6UNIT5 FOOTPT6M-lO,ao6e $F FOOTPRINT-9.0We SF _ - FOOTPRM-160M SF _- _ _ _ _ _—_ ,v _ _ .• _ - II r,• BLDG. 11 _ ' _ ' . • . � _ _ _ � {;•',••�I I - _ - _ PAD=53.0 - _ _ _.. - •� .i �\ , 2-STORY / 16 UNITS / n FOOTPRINT-B OBBl SF • - _ PAD=54.5 �'• T- - �- - - - - - - - - - Y ~ %.n: K \ - - •- - ,... _ - - - - = - : - - - _ - OSTORY l3T UNITS -. •� By. - - • CLUB � _ _ .s _ .. _ FS701T'!mlT-7,fORA6F HOUSE I 1 } - - �Y` LF O QFOGIPflAT.1�.90Ctff V BLDG.4- I II BLDG. 4-1 PAD -51.0 i _ BLDG. 7 - - PAD=51.0 }STORY/16UNITS� PAD=53.0 2STORY 112 UNITS FOOTPR..... OS SF { - - •_-r_ }STORY 12. UNIT. I i - FooTPRINr-Tsoo:sF - l _ :. . • _ - - - • • - :_• eoomNvn.lo.000isF WTpI BLDG.6 �- PR-DET,BASIN- BLDG. S - - _ ' ' • 1• TDP=d6.6 PAD=50.5 PAD=52NI BTMN2.0 _ ' 2-STORY/2<UNITS 2-STORY 116 UNITS _ _ _ FOOTPRINT-116B6t FOOTPRINT-6MSF 77 - •N51•rE' -_- •---E%. F.:Of••-i11�-- __�- •�cUWai7iil11'-_^ - --- -_. _ -__-__ . _ _ _ le 4 LE _ �. - - - - ----- - ____ -- --_ __ -_� --�--� _ __-----_ - _------ --- I�- :,1 1 [aBTrta`rt -Ilhj- ---r - ..ems-..- f �_ >r ---- - - - - - �uFf1CL~------------------------------ -�, ----- - _ _ -- - --- --- -- -- ----- —. -- --VENJrTl --------' ------ ----- _ _-.._- --- --- _ - - T --� dz LME --- --�_ ---- - _ - - - _ -- - - C � _ - -------_ _ --�`.- -- 4.-----.--- IRAfFI ZJ AD TS aG -ac' i s ABBREVIATIONS.•_ EARTHWOW LYIANTITIES C/L CENTERLINE TP TOP OF PAVEMENT RAW CUT' 5,500 YARDS SCALE: 1"=40' EG EXISTING GROUN7 TO TOP OF CURB RAW FILL: 47,400 YARDS FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING IMPORT: 41,900 YARDS FS FINISH SURFACE TW TOP OF WALL THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE AN ENGINEERS ESTIMATE ONLY AND GB GRADE BREAK (XX,XX) EXISTING ELEVATION ARE PROVIDED FOR GRADING PERMIT PURPOSES- CONTRACTOR CP COVERED PARKING SWALE SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES FOR THIS BID PURPOSES, �J TV A SFr PRINTED ON: 06�06�2023 �� /y-yl g�µ�TOT' OF WM 02M / ELEVATION 252-27 TC / OAi NGVON F REVISIONS �M 1LQFENS' 7 E G A N CIVIL, INC. APPROVED BY: PLAN CHECKED BY: IN THE CI I I OF LA OUIN I A, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 2 f� �• .iI.L DESCRIPTION TW a [Us AT of RCR AS SHIM ON THE CITY a RANCHO MIRAGEMARK BY OAIE APPR. DATE �9 �r1- ------ !f SHEET L STREET PLANE FOR THE KEESS ER OFFICE BUILDING, BEET 9 a 9 ON FILE IN 1 E i . �s LA QUANTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS DIAL (`, OFFICE a Ian EOINER a THE CITY a RAVLtO MIRAGE AS PLAN KIBEP E06OC321. w w Ph BOX 52B2 BOINI4 Cd 9224E-gpBE CIHL OF BEFORE m (1su, 404. W+I'WFE�NCIVILCBIb DAB CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN SHEETS 3 YOU DIG THE BASIS OF BEARII,'GS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA '� NO, �D �^ PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: CDORD:HA SYSTEM (CCS63), 2GNE VI, (201] 50 EPOCH) A5 PER GRID INVERSE 1IT * TRAFFIC CITY FILE NUMBER' TOLL FREE 1-`.:;-;':.-i1:} CucuuDONS 5- EEN CONRNUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (COR-S) STATIONS `"r CrYlt +T 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LEAST M DA 9TCa YOU DIG P491 MD PIN1 PER PU3USHED VALUES PRONGED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBIT AND 'CIF qRA DATE: 06/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST Y AVENUE 50, LA OUINTA, CA 92253 pF CALAR A PJBLIC SERVICE BY UNYFu�OUND SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (SO PAC), BEING: NORTH i� 59' 35.49• WEST. RFN.IAMIN DANIFI FCAN, R f F_ ]lD]fl REVIFWFD AND RFC()IAIAFNDFD RY: AM 646-070-016 PUBLIC1 HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - � VILLAGE APARTM TS P — ; I 1 4 11 ` lull —II �4 1 I — I. J Jl L Ll L LI L - I wRAgE I CARAG6 GARAGE - • GARAGE 6MADE '4/RAG{ GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE WAAf� GARAGE ' =iQLJLMI;_T EA WIN — ^ _ — �G� 1�1m w,N sayEr,A- , _ — — — — — w-. iw'��� � --- — _ ae LF Frt 1r usEx uE�— I CLEwan j I f ,I 41.0 iF F.IxR� G-EA1tl1T rFFEffP. O _ N_ = xl BLDG- 9 BLDG' 10 PAD=55.0 J n Ri5cc�7 ¢a, BLDG.2 Z =I �� }SAD=53.5 2-STORY /+6 UNITS 1 °A$1" 0 _ -' , BLDG, i1 PAD=51-5 BI - PAD=51.0`-� raTORx/22UNITS F _ :-57QRY/,b UNITS. FOOTPRINT -9000x6F JTTI 7 ` FOOTPRINT 10,00036E _ +CdrPls.'T-PDOQ•f:,F'o' i-SiGRY iNN,Tb.. �� y Ill FoamENlf;2,�SP. � N!D �a BLDG 11 PAD=�53-0 GR 2-9., ,� �./ITS LLJ Ld � — - • - . _ � .mil 1 13i � J I r �Y 9. l I ITT¢ ° pr DG. s 1 _r 4 I ns[n x— — I — — Ln��r�' N — — PAD=54-5 "j SGTaRtfk UNITS //, �r+ - `�. 1 r CLUS } rrwrTwwr u.s w - I. I - _ n HOUSE. p — — - i. 11� c,'d PAErSS.a sm WmLt c� sm e i BLDG. L 3. PAD=53.0 r� 1 3-STORY/]S UNITS�- - FOOTPRINT. 140W3 iF y - .. 3 Y0. _ LL k BLDG.4 FigXISG BLDG- 4-1 - PAD=51.0 BLDG, 7 3 bl z.P�D`Su�ISTO--FGOTPANr�Bw SF II ) ~ UNITSLTOFv/PAD7$vr+.0't: • :`I �' ti!'1 �I �� POwPPIMr-f.Soy¢LP TDIE R gT azu tt, - .a . 1--.-. rt� ISd L �uEr>= — — — - — J I 1 =,sFR,r �:1 — —j r lE .'�. MM ) . _. - - ..I ...• .... -.- _- -.. ]EA IC - _"L 1 �Y�.dddYYY / 1 . Gd2 RIE WFF I FI. - OET. W.mw BLDG. $ BLDG. 6 Ire' Tvr.ae.b PAD=50_¢ {� 'PAD-52,0. :.y1 GPT r�¢1n11TA _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ f- - - - ----� I-STGRY 116 UHfTR � 10 - _ - - ��II.. FODTPRMT•B.001 SF - _ - _ _ _ --- _ - - �-L•- - --_ _ - __- - _ . ED '- - P[9Nr-OF-ANT 1SD r - - - —---- - - _ -�5D SD 6-_ - _—_ — -— ---— — --- - ---- ----__-- - _-------_ __---- _ _ _ _�- ---�- _---_--=---------- _ _--_ --_---_-�_-- --=_ !- ` - - --- _. - :aVFCLEtIfA6EEE DROP yw - _ _ -- I T. T iGEFies -AiTjc E%$10 EYRB D%!6iim rw ` - - �0-1.:.'c .. � . � "'"—fIPFFiC Old --'. • - - - TRiFFf C LME _ - - 7&4T — o �P Ij/L/ -. I'-- _e - _ _.__,.--:�_: -__- — _ _• - _--. - --_- .. _ — - - -. -- — _ --._ _- _-._--.---- � _ —IFS -- -_ — — EC LW _ 40 — --0 — ED SCALE: 1"=40' PRINTED ON: 06/06/2023 BENCHMARK �� � e7�xa TOP w aTe ezoofi / DEVAnaE zsz.z7 e / O k NYD29 uARK�-BY - DATEGINEER --- REV9CM5 APPR1DATE QiDTY fESal-N PLAN GHECNED Y. IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _ _ DESCRIPTION: TOP OF - AT THE - AS SHORN a THE C.- OF RANOIO AURAE tia ,W DAAry *r E G A N CIVIL, INC. r■ APPROVED BY: SHEET 3 STREET FLANS FOR THE ESs.w OFFICE BUILDING, BEET 9 OF 9 GH FILE IN nE Q 'a r r LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS Q r CALL f OFFICE OF cltt ENGI Em OF E cm of aAnG MIRAGE As PLAN NIffR Ea600. 71 y w� a pC fli1! 5T82 LA N)lINTA Ed 92P48 SY92 slvu of BEFORE BASS OF �,�T,�: - m _ = haul Ao�•��ss rrxw-Ffakf:lu�LeoN DAB PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN E 3 YOU DIG THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA �- K11 73010 i PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION CIF: • ETS COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE 'A. (2017.50 EPOCH) AS PER GRID INVERSE TRAFFIC CITY FILE NUMBER TOLL FREE ,-;} �;,�s_+ CALCUTATONS BETWEEN CONTNUOSLY OPERATNG REFERENCE (CORS) STATDNS dr sry 1� t 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LEAST TWO DAYS REFS YOU DIG P491 AND PIN1 PER PUBLISHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBIT AND F aF 1144 - DATE: 06/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST k AVENUE 50. LA QUINTA. CA 92253 A PB IC SERVICE BY UDEECRM SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (SO -PAC), BEING: NORTH 76. 59' 35.49• WEST. BENJAMIN DANIEL EGAN, R.C.E• 7 0070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 646-070-016 slda, •. :;- ..h- e mde �. C4TYCOUN�PFI�IT�P'� N'/��T �`uqT�F�Y�YqA{{iDSS��,��66pp,,KLr t �p���INP Ord ARCHITECTS �r -. �m aro a_ an yard yDd Fnr I-/-- 91DI�A61ACIt: AxSiWR3n�s'a"+aY+LTa'°-- �. --- _ _ _ _ N reowi3vs3' :nr=.-rr- - p �y rT{.�.�u�ya :IV.6'M>;1rr .O.DE'�IOLe w,• _ �J// •_! �PUOyL��py+,. �f�T�VE�1i•i t6%�IED1i�f4�fiKL-Fp��F\I� _ - -__F xe:,_.� __- _ - R1, R2 {� t BLOCK WALL L� C C C f F -I e J 1 r� P 7 G G P P ay P P P P I _ PEP P II G G G p O P 0 f �.l P I r a 6 G a P P /,_ / ()221'IR4 `l Y p p C G O 6 p P C 0 6 ry r C C G G '11. ` / fl ._ P rrine!c� !--caa. rcue2 o�ecHFri ♦ of - ....♦ i _ p I - 1 _ I �' � gyp( ♦ b'. 6. SETBACK VN1e�'� CC,S /. SETBAICKiLINE M1 POWER POLE TD P T - RE CARPOTii CAFFLIRT TgAyt L,✓7$URE CAMIORT f♦,IA'rER01$rRICj CANING BE UNDERGROUND, P - - _ t +' - " - - - / C SETBACKFMIN A1UM 101-0" -1 _ _ I PEH 1 I ' TY P. 1 P f i CP Cv CP~I. p.� P 4--w GP +rra.n'�p v a CYCLE RAC REIJ LI p-EII '�' t� 't _ _ -PROPERTY LINE 3US STOP & SHELTER I P ............ ....... ........... - _ . e . " " . > . �__�• - i. C !� ar ' " '-BICYCLE K _ »-i N)F ^I�. J '� P P °-�`'" Lye =•iBICYCLE RACK„•�I DESERTSCPE P Bid P } Bldg.• . Bdg.2 FIN JStPOTiY Bldg. 10 T16 tory 1 r 2 Story ,r , _ 9 • s Total - Bldg. 1 ••I • • 22 Units Total 2 Story'_' p1•` I ( p p 2 StoryEy, i •• 16 Units Total I I PROPERTY LNYE16 Unfits Total a4[r1.n R.AA� P PY - �. y 71F96oT57:-wf rji�lJj l{y. P P Bldg. 11 •"� --� •°!'"%•'• CARPOPIT ']p' t 1 P 25tory V��-•.r` `-'/ _y I I P /// 16 Units Total 1RIAGE DRF11 1 •I CTI DESERTSCAPEIA•Xc,' f IFIy IliY1 PATFE �. i / / sti P P UNE OF IMAGE IP's" OFTMVEL y r P HEN}I4701 RE$TR F TRABr1 f J I 1 A PED 6ATE-.'/ 1•j FLY 'aatl , 1-- 1 • • // �18P. F. P. .I. r•p FIRE PIT �. 11Pgy: Irgt �� • •'! .lrl� i> GATE ` ':-� b Bldg.3 a "; C' T �-jRR .'• :_ r ` 06 f e tN1 HYCRAHT - 3 Story Bldg. B + ',• . ! •gip j' r 4 t p1LSF ( 36 Units TotalI 3 Story 7 INA N N Clubhouse l f r TRASH DESERTSGPE 36 Units Total aP f f e►i �t,! LUa 17-Iv I G.. Y ErE^ PEnrI�E 1 Story I. • Im •� - R - . ............. CP Tl J '�+ �•y�� W Ir. r - .; P •.F !.'-S:uE DWG'S. sR�.• •FIRE PITI_((r of -'I ` -r` /�„h -..I , -• , • 11�TC1Tj 1 P.D' el i• L!',G V I -- I.�- �� fA r ! 4f %Hn1c " s - : J .nr �►+' t ya�rWr..�/��: Z z 1 BOX. lE - DESERTSGPE F �� 1- - Y• _. �' / _� V `L - =!r• f• PED 6J( - cDA.RDti3 1' �`'rt iFer _ PER CV9yQ (� t cL�s1BLE p nR, e n ; - fe - w f• pp 1 W� / t'� $1�►. Z w LIECEL-1j+ SITE SIGN 1'•ER P r1I rSK Fem P Z• y LANE CB 11094 B B S S P F Bldg. 4-1 Bldg. 4-2 g. fA 8 I P 2 Sto 3 Story cyF cP �F r co Q Ir RETEMION F.A.�r P F • ° 12 Units Total 18 Units Total r� _ BIdg.7 �I I 17t / ! [] P (+• I Y cP 3 Story R 1 P P 1 24 Units Total ,I I �}� ••�! p 117 b--�r-�. • p1 I / I 1 1ayl `T 1�4` DESERTSGPE HYDRANT--�. Ir !GP u P EP I:P �cr EP• - ..p.pil,,�. p.. 5t GNnivf ^6ya •, I:•npt. I Er i. u 'Ofr ECLK3RI -.'. - Y =I� ,', CJ• Cp` • ARP.7RT DESERTSCPE J{ TRESTR! ON C! !_' a /• Cp 1 -r'Gy P }iINEOFIMASE RESTRCORRIDOR ♦ cP GP]f. // p �r r ♦ HEIGHT REy'lIUCTI02t ♦ _ / _ /• •• PROPERTY LINE P I TRASH IENC er:RE >ti:�p •' / I t >9 -LINE OF IMAGE CORRIDOR __ [[ �� '•• /" • - �1EiCHT RESTR[CTIOH f 1 r� EP•. cPlp C'j 6r` 4`k rP�p a P.n+yw N�wrl.' +.a G'I c7 cP cP'' crl c! oPl ti .t 1 [ r .p ee rs, r loft '' �} PI - / •, 2: �y - - - v • bLa Fx+c - +-�'d' y ChRP9RTJ / A 1 ......� . ... " -� • CP trnAr 4F - -... IN) HYP.MNT .. DESERTSGPE • 6ERl7SC•4PE - - . - } 1 p L. ....... .. ...... x 4 i 1 I 1 UILDAHG SETBACK .' `1 - •tN1 HY �••'p ET7CLC16URE PER PErpME[ER I Bld 5 4 .. .. •• •" 22Sory PICIKLEEBBALL dP - :,D• I/ I LANDSCAPING SETBACK 2 bud I• 24 Units TataI r 7 .P .7 (E) POWER POLE T AViR 2IItN1N f046Ef6AP'1 • • • • • rY • • • • j114- I�il --{1 p 11 - 7' BE UNDERGROUND, AVBPAfE 2GKC SRrPAuf I 16 Units TO[al ,;' TYP. I y SEE SPE10:lG RAIePaR ( e FPO ll \rlpp5A0x1441�TiRMATAbe WALL - _ Y I• 6 AGCEE G - -,.y, ERIMETFR BLOCK WALL DTIR' LANDSCAPING SETBACK 1. ! !L• YY,� „pA'}y-•3•E TAP 7l �T4 CVWD PROPERTY NOTE.I.IINI1-1-ItO-BACK ACH_ nI AVERAGEIFIC SETBACK --_NBR'S9'03w_ -- _ Yl16N1■I - PROPERTY LIN_ ���� A Pn6'i) "BE SPECIFIC INMRUOR 1xpY371EV 1 ,6. RO ••F F � - - yI � � - n H1t ,{PVIiKW.41NPDRWMN M144'21'OG'1Y N09.5!'(?w. 279'-_` - 3252 L---_--------_---` ---- L-CT70 ---------------- �-`_- - ---_-- ----�---------- EXTERIOR SIDEY PROPERN LIN -' POyyIER POLE TO �(F.}1'ERTICA�.'CREST CCAi'EO Vkii�ICRLCRREST Npo'ae�:V 117787 (Fm6•yQO7TN 112T.p73 ru - -Y--------------------------- (32 srasl CE] '-INTEf110is SIDE YARD SETBACK �� gENy�y 1 - (IMAGE CORRIDOR) SE UNDERGROUND, SIDEYARD SETBACK: A1INIMUAI S'-0" GET PLUS 1'-0" FOR EVERY `RIGHT-OF-WAY PER PARCEL MAP MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 25'-0" TYP FOOT OVER 17'-D- IN BUILDING HEIGHT, MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 10'-0' 1327.W (132760 R2, R3 - AVENUE 50 D 11' 3 Common A- C.I.NI.tloR6 Qw H01 Px ' EiBra PARKrrvG RATIOS are,A 71uIpBnQ AT+r A... (SF) Brit Type Unll Nam. Bads City Arc. (SF) TRlal sF) D!Y PER LQMC 9.E0.210 (K) BY -RIGHT PARKING INCENTIVE, THE 1., Flrsl Floor 1-13ed Ap.Ilmenl 1A-ADA 1 29 673 19517 FOLLOI'NING PARKING RATIOS SHALL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE A1Yg55fj [{III Site Plan ADA 5 ADA = ACCESSIBLE STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9' % 19')+5' AISLE DEVELOPMEM1T (INCLUDING MARKET -RATE UNITS) Bldg 01 (2-ST00.YJ lAp7R 7AN &F Pp iLEr}l \ /B�-'tf� z T••� CLUBHOUSE RESIDENTACTIVITY 978 1-Bed Aparlmenl to -STD 1 31 673 20,563 ADA VAN 2 ADA VAN= ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING SPACE (9'% 19).8' AISLE V t/ Fire Riser MECHANICAL 12 1-Bed ApR-KI,t 1B-ADA 1 44 755 33220 1-BRUNITS: ISPACEPERUNITREQUIRED Bldg 02 (2-SGRY) 14.798 .Rfdtl pPDER 6lWA' C 26 C= COMPACT PARKING SPACE(BS'% 16') 2-BRUNITS: 1.5 SPACES MR UNIT REQUIRED Bldg03 GYM RESIDENT ACTIVITY 725 1-Bed Apartment 1B-STD 1 62 755 46.810 (3-STORY] 37,27E 12 e2fi SF PER FLOOR HALL CIRCULATION 186 2-BedA-dI,t 2A-ADA 2 34 960 12,610 CG CC = COVERED COMPACT PARKING SPACE (BS'%175') Bldg 04 (2&3-STORY 35,3DO 14,007 SF PER FLOOR FLOOR AND SECOND STORY p PARKTNf PROVmED ) )7JB] SF THIRD STORY HK SERVICE 36 2-Bed Apartment 2A-STD 2 52 960 49, 920 CP NJ CP= COVERED STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9'%19') icueirw,,T 9'ALBR CLNSIq rrr EDanlhr Bldg 05 111STORY) 15,443 77225E PER FLOOR OMco ADMINISTRATION 290 338 252 202.970 sq R FEV 5D FEV = FUTURE EV PARKING SPACE (9' % 19) Bldg 06 (2STORY)21,809 10, WS SF PER FLOOR Pool RETENTION BASIN 1.343 FEV ADA 1 FEV ADA = FUTURE EV ADA PARKING SPACE (9' % 19) .5' AISLE 1665PACE5 PE0.1-BED U!IIT (15PACE PER UNIT] Bldg 07 (3 STORY) 27.430 9144 SF PER FLOOR TYRE V"g Pool Ddl TERRACE 7.01 FEV VAN 1 FEV VAN = FUTURE EV VAN PARKING SPACE (9'%19)+B'AISLE 17LSVALGFI9}■S1 WNR r1 GRACE EERUNh1 Bldg08 R-25(1YITHDUT AREA INCREASE) DENSITY CALCUTATONi 295 REQUIRED PARIGr:G SPACES FOR UNITS P-STORY) 34,131 11,377 SF PER FLOOR =70 NCR ALLO'NED Pool Equip MECHANICAL 1B6 BASE OEI:SITY: 1403 ACREBr 12 UNITS ACRE=I6B BASE UNITS G 51 G=GARAGE STANDARD PARKING SPACE (10'%20) 336 PROVIDED PARKING SPACES m0. UNITS Bldg 09 (2-70RY) 16.114 BP57SF PER FLOOR RR RESTROOMS 124 TOTAL UNITS PROPOSED: 252UNITS M. t MAIL= DESIGNATED NAIL VAN PARK114G SPACE (9'%19) YER.N:BL TAVLE eeA..AA[rmaeLE uIdIRPV DP 91 deICe AEHvpEMDE PLAXE Shower RESTROOMS 66 JSGUESTSPACESPERUNIT PROVIDED Bldg 10 (2-STORY) 17,163 :FU11SP.PERYILOR 5A °'. OENSItt BONU515 BEING PROPOSED P 91 P=STArIDA0.D PARKING SPACE(9'%]9')(9'%1)J Bldg ITR-2S('A Spa RETENTION BASIN 93 Up7 A'=1E3.LUhtilv�GRE=252 PpTY« opts S� 1 26TOTAL GUEST SPACES PROVIDED Cl.bh. (2-STORY) 17,163 B$025F PER FLOOR R-] S (li'ITHD'JT AREA INCREASE) Sloe SERVICE 111 Clubhouse (]-STORY) 3126=45TDRIE6 ALLOWED FOR 50'.i DENSITY BONUS,4- OF BASE UNITS NEED TO BE K-ODERATE FA[nTrY■■s.R K SLGAPAGESPACESPRI-DED Pool Equip. (1-STORY) 206 Wet Bar CIRCULATION 36 FGCAmuUt A^.&mm GiLD(rGi W.IEO DENSItY IaNLSPPkL'ETTrvGEs YLRKfxR 2 ACCESSIBLE GARAGE SPACES PROVIDED PER CHC TAPLEHQ.2 ALL61VMlEAREA FALTTAI WITMECHANICAL 12 UK VEREDSTANDA0.DPARKINGSPACES: 92 SPACES INCLUDES 2 FEV SPACES 258,1995gk jyPE l-p 10- 7A=ERATE PICCME uwr. UN COVERED COMPACT PARKING SPACES: 28 SPACES INCLUDES I FEV SPACES R251.10YITHOUT HE INCREASE) 41,T�L P9n UNCOVERED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 6 SPACES INCLUDES 2 FEV SPACES 1-=TCTfJ P'r�AllG2h�+PT�INeO =]IGHT BE PER FLOOR ALL01%ED 1.1ARHET-PATE UNITS 11B CARPORT STANDARD PARKING SPACES: 3J0 SPACES INCLUDES 4B FEV SPACES WNluuu REcurRE�K•7bERaTE Ie.IT2 L NIMI!L1,1 UNITS At --'QED W'1 DENSITY BONUS 252 CARPORTCOMPACT PARNIM1'GSPACES: 4 SPACES INCLUDES 0 FEV SPACES NFPA13 SPRINKLER SYSTEM COMPLYINGWITH CBC SECTION 90331.1 CARPORT ACCE-131-B PARKING SPACES: 4 SPACES INCLUDES 0 FEV SPACES TOTAL PATIOAREA. 0,65]SF GARAGE STANDARD PARKING SPACES: 55 SPACES INCLUDES 1 FEV SPACES T{Tf&l &4LCPIli'FAE� 9,043 &F (N I C STAIR V�NDINGS) GACME'.AT'r.CNas MAdtliIISJ�I'!E y .�fhi5 INCLUDE[ TOTAL SPACES 522 SPACES 53 FEV SPACES ■ IPA IRWIN PARTNERS 1 A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fscher Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa M... CA 92626 1714) 557 2448 w,ip.oc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 Site Plan Al PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages,pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS MAOA {. -, •li .A,ADA ' 1B-A ,a.•AIi.A 1A , AaLDA 7S .' AAA e:l ri � .IVBLCG 2L� _ � TA•A r'rr BLDG1 •y4lL 16.A dIDA 1F � 7D- e.rr 1 - m. •arP rn � r rRr IA ems. ,rl R-y a AD �r a DG; •2 4& f_ �Y BW64 I• iSDA 7A . ADi1 I _ 'T. k IAA' A1RnA 1 a.r -�3 "BLDG 5 % r 1.nr wk 76 r LEGEND PROPOSED ENCLOSURE LOCATION FOR METERS AND SWITCHGEAR EQUIPMENT " MA ty 7B- -AM IB- wr . rs '.7, BLDG s0 ,Ip� •..y 1B, i -ADA 113 _ t� �. F- -. B• rt . bb P - BLDG 6 B. rr A•ADA ?' . r^ g-A S-' it8 1 BLDG 7 r ` �/- AD IX-ADA S 16 - A•Af7A iAJI Aa1DA I r s '• ADA _ .Iq� arr nr h<r - BLDG G 1B- •ADA 'AA -�•ADA to � : i �ArDA rrr .ner <W First Floor Plan scALE:1rJr= r-0• ';��7 TYP. FIRE RISER ENLARGED PLAN SCALE: Itr = 1'-D• '.OIPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments First Floor Plan �J� A R C H I T E C T B Troutdale Village, LLC. A2 245 Flecher Avenue, S.R. B-2 C.M. Mae. CA e2026 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714)5572446 w Ipaoccom La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 e RC,HITECTeaE ELADMINC OONCeLTIHG PLOT DATE: 7126I2023 21014 La Quints SD V2 From BS Garages pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS Ila- AStb $A ; A-SM 6-5 A-STO 8 LD I Zm 2 imp mt Lur 1%. S ROOF BELOW IA,5 A.Sfl1 113- 1— ID 1B IRWIN PARTNERS 01PAE A R C H I T E CT S (714) 557 2448 w ip-C com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING A-SM fs;5 17 RT.. D-ST B.-S BLOG a La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 %a. 11 -STO I ,B-s N 'T' JSL! I -- is 113! <N>Second Floor Plan SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0' Second Floor Plan A3 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quirila SO V2 From as Garages pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS �fy I zr- L L-F EZ f n MA 1 I I J �Y- 'lU ir SLD� t jb Ill �LDSs,4 I 1D 2A � V w 2/I - STG IT A3' 40 6LDG'9 _ AL aNSCALE:ThirL1/37loor Plan 0 •IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Third Floor Plan A R C NI T E C T 9 Troutdale Village, LLC. A4 245 Fischer Avenue, Suile a-2 Cosle Mese CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714) 557 2448 —iPeoo _m La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7126/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From 3S Garages pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS LEGEND F SOLAR READY ZONE HVACCONDENSERS FIRE ACCESS, 4'-0" CLEAR MIN, joI PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fl-her Avenue, Sulle B-2 Coale Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 w 1pepp — ARCfII TCTURE 'a LXNWh6 FDPd4,ULTlu4 ROOF ® BELOW I aLDG4 r dx C7C �m �z BLDG S r1 .SOLAR READY ROO,FF_ NO DIMENSION LESS THAN 5'-0" — i� ■ r NEWl EACH SUBAREA MUST BEAT LEAST 160 SF IF TOTAL ROOF AREA EXCEEDS 10,000 SF SOLAR ZONE ON STEEP SLOPED ROOFS MUST BE ORIENTED BETWEEN 110 AND 270 DEGREES OF TRUE NORTH, ORIENTATION DOES NOT APPLY ON ROOFS SLOPED LESS THAN 2:12 MUST BE FREE OF ROOF PENETRATIONS AND ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT MIN. 15% OF TOTAL ROOF AREA IS REQ'D TO BE SOLAR READY, EXCLUDING ANY SKYLIGHT AREA TOTAL ROOF AREA: 119.225 SF SOLAR READY MINIMUM: 15% OF TOTAL ROOF AREA SOLAR READY MIN. REQUIRED: 17.883.25 SF SOLAR READY PROVIDED: 17.894 SF NOTE: - PER DESERT SAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, PARAPETS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF FIVE FEET TALLTO SCREEN/HIDE HVAC EQUIPMENT - SEE SHEETA21 FOR LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAMS - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN JOINTAPPENDIX JA11 (2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE) -SOLAR READY ZONE MAY ALSO BE LOCATED ON CARPORTS, FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 BLDG 18 I I I s BLDG 9 A& <W Roof Plan SCALE: 1/32"= 1'-0- Roof Plan A5 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages,pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS SECOND & THIRD FLOOR UNITS - STANDARD 2 A2 Bed - Standard sCALE-ire = t-v 2 Bed -ADA 2A-CAIE:1„ p 1 Bed - Standard SCALE: vs• = GROUND FLOOR UNITS - ACCESSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH CBC 11AACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS 1131 Bed - ADA SCALE: 119' = 1'_0' 1 p 1 Bed -Standard 1 i c tpe va , tA.RDA 4 LIN cw-e ua• +•.0. .Ip� IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Unit Plans A e C A t T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A6 245 Flecher Avenue, Suite B-2 Coate Mee. CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714,1112448—Ipe..— La Quints, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 AR�wtT[ee uaP vLnnutnp tuft-u�it.to PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinla SD V2 From BS Garages pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS M LLU!tgU8E L l aW1 Clubhouse SCALE 114' = 14i •IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Ave nuc, Suile B-2 Coda Ltasa CA 92621 (7,4)557244E 'j". 7 RCHITECT U RE PLANNING CONSULTING POOL DECK +,1-2- 0 Rool � FMF-11 01i � � irlioll FLU RISER —; TI I .Cr REGLET EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ, STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE. OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP, DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, 04Clubhouse -North Elevation SCALE ioV - 1'4r - ------------------------ - - SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 - -- - --- DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. � � I r — -- o srucco z DUNN EDWARDS 7� DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ_ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, REGLET rnr E¢u� 03Clubhouse - South' Elevation STUCCO SCALE-ur = 114Y DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. -- SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. r-- STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS . DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. r STUCCO 3 VXTEMOR SHOWERS DUNN EDWARDS ODE6204 /J�Cbhose u -East Elevation (Pool Deck) TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. LSG Ilu — — — „r-'P STUCC04 - — - DUNN EDWARDS — DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ- EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP BROWN TYP 0 1 Clubhouse - West Elevation (Entry) SCALE.-1H' :. 1'-0' AC CENT- ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD Clubhouse A7 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BS Garages pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS •I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 244E—11'aoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING FTER;jRr I.-,.-. 1B1 � zx � ■ ■ l F3 •1T NNW AE[f�sED HIdE STYC W RECLEY 04Bidg 1 - West Elevation sCA E-va- - 1'-0' E TERW 61-R T1'P La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 STUC✓l REOLET �-TUISE 5r,R FkO PAINTED BLACK, TYP VM Yl1i4 -J RECESSED O•�Bldg 1 -South Elevation �i SCA4@ ,F ,zv�• Owl „+zr T n �] TM1IN Floor TQ Fen flwr -TIRPR.SER LDTU REGLET O�B�Idg 61 East Elevation . +zr s' _--- �,z5'S L—Fsaa"OLAs3 FREh"".H D 01 Bldg 1 - North Elevation "M STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ- SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ, ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ- VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM- COLOR:BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD Bldg. 1 - Elevations A8 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quintet SO V2 From BS Garages -pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS I psSTUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. n eLEEFEC� t VIIM1L inracw �PIaER]VS5 FRE4CN DobR 111111101111111011 l illy I(t�llfllhlllfl{II nII IIraI�IIIII Fl�oI�ml II�11�I M I mm' al `NBE `J MLIN P.uNrA t-9. "IF aT'c 1.02 „+2r �. �]mib Floor F b T �4/A Bldg 2 - West Elevation SCALE ue- - 1"� 03Bldg 2 - South Etevation SCALE 11R' = 1'-0' OBldg 2 - East Elevation 25,A4s 1:R• = 1'•9' T—p_p ��3 ThiN Flmr STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ" STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. I _ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ" STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT. OR EQ_ SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ" j - ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS I I - CHOCOLATE PUDDING, .1 Y, rxar OR Q_ EQ_ OR EQ- _ 1_ CO.— _ 9R _ -•-i ,zPt„-°iaev�o 1 'u VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS j COLOR: WHITE F MFIHi RAILINGS _TL__O gE[AMFry'S pFfR[IU 'Mr%wNw e -IF.=STL RAILING 5 HIIAE+ TUBE STEEL, OR SIM" I_Ei EXTERIORLIGHT.TYP. FRENCH DOOR PAINTED BUCK, TYP COLOR: BLACK 2 - Forth Elevation OBldg ROOFING SCALE If = t'•D- TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD •olIPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 2 - Elevations A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A Fischer Avenue, Su ile B-2 Cosle Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 245 (714)ss7244e wjpeoc"com La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BS Garages pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS BUILDING 3-1 BUILDING 3-2 SCHEME16 STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. — _ —�ERE im we �� I,I„ I� � III:I: r,,l __ III Ilul!; 91Ei1 -- -!FIE — :xHs.. s s� �" -- 0Bldg 3 - West Elevation Overall 4s:�E. �� e T-0. 0Bldg 3-'I - West Elevation 3 _ , 0"oa-huA ,..xa Ila L—RE1;E.,maN c I—Srci[OREOLET O L Bldg. 3 - South Elevation `SCALE 1.9- - V-0 STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ- SCHEME2: I� ....�y STUCCO �IIf"1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ- STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ, SCHEMES: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ- STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ- STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, l OR EQ, 1J. ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS 1 Ill.f j _Ij DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, 1 I OR EQ. •- —i E c.�o.war m cE'E I - -.• � � �� CAL-�-; �,114 r � �— , -dl i VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS RBCR dA:•5 :*ll_-Cv R` Twee sn. R�uLINc otcan..tcL :•w•iunK;vx TUBE STEEL, OR SIM frl6Ndlbtil'R w•INT60lLAR. TT•-RIOPUGNT,TYP COLOR: BLACK OBldg 3-2 - West Elevation ROOFING •.Ir r� TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 3 - Elevations A R C IN T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. 245 Fischer Avenue, S,ile 3-2 Cosle Mese CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 1,14I 557 2446 w Ipeoc com La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 712612023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages -ph CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS BUILDING 3-1 I BUILDING 3-2 STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. _■ ■_—■■ � �.� as JIB_ �� � � ■ ■ ■� ��].I�II•�� II; ■■ ■■ IiIIR .IIW !� 1.lillll �� ��. III^ QIIIIIhIIII . �Ir..l CI ,.+ar � a mIm Ploor �2 SamrM Fbor � 1 F,nl Fbor 04Bldg 3 - East Elevation Overall SCALE &'}Ll r 1-4" 03Bldg 3-1- East Elevation SCAj{,5 ,•� O — — m.at �s •+t - ts;pFltslileps RECESSEDNICHE aN OREGLET OM -North Elevation -------------- 33� --'= ,1 1- — TO. ptTR'STAN Arm _ I .l i III STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR ED- STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT. OR EQ, SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ- ACCENT- ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE nm nos RAILINGS *U E a RAILIrr, Si..REGLET `OECOWIVE TUBE STEEL, OR SIM EXTERIOR LIGHT. TYP COLOR: BLACK 01 Bldg 3-2 - East Elevation ROOFING Sl—%Lr' A' - 1•A• TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD ;10I PA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 3 - Elevations A R C H I T E C T B Troutdale Village, LLC. All 245 Fischer Avenue, SUIIe B-2 Cosle Mese CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714).7 2448—ipeuc— La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages.pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS ET C-}LV-a1;.RAILING Note: Bldg. 4 - South Elevation Similar BUILDING 4-1 Note: Bldg 4 - South Elevation Similar --l— - BUILDING 4-2 -RECESSED NICHE �Tlli:•i REC 05Bldg 4 - West Elevation SCFILE: fib' = 1'•B' I ) L 04Bkdg 4 - North Elevation Overall IcgLf•�'• r{r ��EL� T"3 tlru Elm 03MR 4-1 -_North Elevation �Re,l - •T^ "D ryrt Fpp F .1r I1 t IM RECE:SED NICIE • • �f�avE¢-ET 0�Bldg 4 - East Elevation �— .T.O_Pl>� STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ- STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT. OR EQ_ SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ- I_ ji __ ACCENT-ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, r OR EQ. CO:'�SEC &=�Sn'Ar �jj L-Or�FEb - SitE.— VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE Fl� RAILINGS STL?A ,TR'E 9TL1C W REpET TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. PAaE K, TY EITEN PAINED BLACK, ttP E.TERIOR Umrt. M COLOR: BLACK O Bldg 4-2 - North Elevation ROOFING Note: Bldg 4 - South Elevation Similar SCALE- f.m- . 1.C- TPO ROOFING MANUF:TBD COLOR:TBD PARTNERS AIPA La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 4 - Elevations A R C A H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, I-I-C. Al2 245 FiscllerA—ue, Suite B-2 Cost, Me- CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714)5572448 �Ipe,c— La Quinta, California92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7126I202323 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages,pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS •$II PA IRWIN PARTNERS III• A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suile B-2 Cosle Mese CA 12626 (714)5572448—ips—om ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING r i'�m.y `ccr Bldg 5 - West Elevation EATENOR 4GNi, Tri+. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 IEC[Sr LilrsE ST�� IV••: vARrtEP aIA=i: T' ACTAirRLLL15 r•nINT(D ,. +2TE' - -_—_ ,zs� -0F .zr P Ply ]mi— o30Bldg 5 - South Elevation SE2,LE: W = 1'•U' .2vs 0 FVP F4u I gEGEs�l1 NICI♦E 3TUCOOREGLET Bldg 5 -East Elevation 0 ,27'-S' ♦2— ,2Z - -Ln:rLa-3miR., r 1E = 01 Bldg 5 - North Elevation SCALE 1,Y . I'Z' STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO DE6034 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT- ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD Bldg. 5 - Elevations A13 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7126/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages.pin SCHEMEI: CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS •$aI PA IRWIN PARTNERS ■ A R C H I T E C T IS 245 Fischer Avenue, S.R. 8-2 Cosle Mese CA 92626 (7141 557 2448 w ipeac 111 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING I Immiiilll+ii'o<ii I� IIII Kill MA i II I!IIIIIII'I!'! J�,Illll�llllilllliilll_ Ili 'lll+lllllllilll;l. f I�', i,.11l--III' III: _ I• .1 R111111Iililii;Il I:lllll:llilll:lli llllia 'IIIII III —ICI'. IelT I�!' ,.II'll:_ �•,i, Yl� IIIIIII IAIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIII �illil i' II lilui r - EX. Liuxr I Bldg 6 - South Elevation O � scr.Lc1:1 i•-0• - 13 -_-- �■q�s.a,egy I ■ III I LRECESSEDNICHE -C E .EC -Lb, I— FRE:-!S - ._E�Lat O[.�IL Bldg 6 - West Elevation 1^1f/�Bld 6 -East Elevation 1 CALF, ire• = 1'{Y 02ZC:ALE'1/8' = 1-0" La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 -1 L&L STL. H+Iu•,O PAINTED—, 'P MErxTREWJ9 PAWr® ,�+2- 3SCEIIT[Oi.OR- - - - - - - - - +2sa G16 .,+2r __ TO I"L}�]TM1iN Fbor h O 1 Bldg 6 - North Elevation $CALF-1W = 110' t` STUCCO DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. r I — STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ, STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, ■STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME 3: STUCCQ 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ, ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR:BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD Bldg. 6 - Elevations A14 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BS Garages,pin STUCCO 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS ;I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, SUlte B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2440 w ipeoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING n T.O. PL _ ] TTIm Fbp 13 13 n7�A.67 � 1 T�PL_ I ,sgiiE LSTLC'LOfIFOIET 04Bldg 7 - South Elevation SGLE Ve - 1'4r EKTERIOR LIGHT. TYP. !ff[WuTTI,p �.cTEnKiR uoHr mm. 0 —laeluTRlLe nArrTrO _ _ -�ae'ti _ro tL� U . -=[1Zff. - O�Bldg 7 - West Elevation SCALE: iA1 - 1'-0' .a33 T.O_PL vRool —T.O_PL_ .]TllUa tMs. �J iil •r1' � FIrsI PIvr IiE1:k35t�fa-^IE STUCCO REGLET B L //�B€dg 7 - Forth Elevation SCAI.E1,8" = VG' .sat LA,yI I F zz imFlool nr Tj I _ ♦„ Floor I Si First Floor TUBE STL PAILING SCHEME3 PAINTED BUCK. TYP OBldg 7 - East Etevation SCALE: I,L' _ V<i La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta. California 92253 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR ED. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ. SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT -ALL SCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR: BLACK ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD Bldg. 7 - Elevations A15 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages,pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY. OR EQ. 6ambR I,IGNT TYP OT Bldg 8 - South Elevation 5CAL I+n• = r.G' RAILING aLA .'P 0 Bldg 8 - West Elevation •+ram uAx TO PL_ TO PL --'k O L Bldg 8 - North Elevation se.AF-I:e = 1'4- .-7a':a ]]�rALTllews xArnso -•x•:c• rAErcHr CGLGR' �a]eE• T. Pl— STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. I STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ_ SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. 'I ACCENT-ALLSCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS _ DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, 1T OR EQ. 4M: EA ''"'�j li] �,_ VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS 11r3 COLOR: WHITE m I'Imr RAILINGS k- eE�P.A71VE L .-= REGLET TUBE STEEL, OR SIM E%TERIORUGNT.TYP. P PPLACa,TYP COLOR: BLACK 01 Bldg 8 - East Elevation ROOFING SCALE: 119' = 1'-0' TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD millPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 8 - Elevations " R ` " I T E ` T 5 Troutdale Village, LLC. A16 =45 FI..hvAreii.le. M11e R:2 Cn41e NJ— CA aj075 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714)557244a—17"=om La Quinta, California92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 712612023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BS Garages.pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY, OR EQ TUBE ST_ RAILING PAINTED BLACK, TYP Ir 1AL1RELl<] bA+1TEtr q!21- 03Bldg 9 - South Elevation SCALE:,' = V-0" @ram — jazz' �]ThiN Fbor ®® TA. IL �`�_-}� l�-� �L�■ TO_7l_J., 1 I M I 13 �� 11J.. 4 FIRE -ER L RECESSED NICHE YTyC[.p REL4Er Bldg 0Bldg 9 - East Elevation sTUc��REMO RfiESsBD mCHk—HNYIWNDOfI Bldg 9 -West Elevation 04 uIr = 1.,w ELUS PAINTED �.2>'S aaR m .z2• ]] rn STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ, STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ- SCHEME 3: P1STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. Ij I J6" I`0 ` I LLI ACCENT-ALLSCHEMES DUNN EDWARDS C _ DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, 0=01 OR EQ. FEjDI�. TO VINYL DOORS &WINDOWS t 1 Pn.I I� COLOR: WHITE RAILINGS �.•.,. wlNDow SGHRT,IE1 .—FIBERGLASS STUCCO REGLET TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. FRENCH DOOR 9Al BL C- Tl'P EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP COLOR:BLACK 0 Bldg 9 - Norlh Elevation ROOFING SCALE VU' • ".rr TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 9 - Elevations 1111 A R C H I T E D T 5 E101PA Troutdale Village, t-LC. A17 NEC Washington Street& Avenue50 a45FlsaarA:elB S. I-a-ZCn„eM.aCABN.. 1714) 557 2448 w Ip.oc M La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING P 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BS Garages pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY. OR EQ_ EETaupR LI3Nj. TYP. 21 Li — .... - .I I-1 . 11 sl n_rc: �tD,:,_H6 �•- •: r:n •::INrr�+r 1 ram_-.. O4Bldg 10 - West Elevation T SCALL 118' = r-B• - FIRhd P^OP Bldg 10 - South Elevation REGLEr L Ri-_i__ED MCHE L sm•I.'•+'v4J'•V Bldg 10 - East Elevation Z bCikTR[LLIG ,.,xra- �� rnlm Floor — I STUCCO2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ- STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME2: STUCCO 1 ' DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT. OR EQ_ SCHEMES: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ_ STUCCO4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. ACCENT- ALL DUNN EDWARDSHEMES i DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, imp"Lim) 1 t ry' � cr' OR EQ, -Cf L is _COLOR: VINYL DOORS &WINDOWS WHITE RAILINGS "I •,L •�, F ,•'•• .. -, - DECORATIVE-CY"IE' LULL IL I..:ILI,,.: TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. .... .-..I IT RIOR LIGHT 11 PAINrED BLACK TYP FFIEriO, COLOR: BLACK Bldg 10 - North Elevation ROOFING 01 SCALE- 1,8• . rt• TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD •IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 10 - Elevations A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A18 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite a-2 Caste Mese CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 IT 14) 557 2448 A—Ap o 11 La Quinla, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 712612023 21014 La Quinla SO V2 From BS Garages pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6242 WELLS GRAY. OR ED f'ELIET txTaBl°R uDyr. WP 4! . +22 ppp���r __ in ��rnim Floor Y�7 — — pp����I�� TO-5aenlF I w � Fart FPm .RA:HE `Ysl1L14xlDOW 04 Bldg 11 - South Elevation �,25- �r 'lam Nmo LTLoF STL RAILING is WINDOW PAINTED BUCK T P %IaERw-,«5 -ssjw t[ 03Bldg 11 - West Elevation BCALE:118- = T-0" .,21- t� _L¢� Va rnlb Floor �Fsu flNir 13 I j 02Bld 11 - North Elevation SCALE Till" = 1'-0' STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6172 BUNGALOW TAUPE, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ. STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ- STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DET597 SHADOW EFFECT, OR EQ SCHEME 3: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6207 EGYPTIAN SAND, OR EQ. STUCCO 2 DUNN EDWARDS DET674 GUNNYSACK, OR EQ- STUCCO 3 DUNN EDWARDS DE6204 TRITE WHITE, OR EQ. STUCCO 4 DUNN EDWARDS DE6034 RAISIN IN THE SUN, OR EQ. _ ACCENT-ALLSCHEMES EDWARDSNN II' DEN NO TE PUDDING, OR EQ- I 45mid Pfm ! 11 11 I ! J IN YL DOORS 8 WINDOWS V - COLOR: WHITE c r•I� RAILINGS �DECOMTIVE I-.. WINDOW (-- FIBERGLASS S C°REGLET TIRE STL.T pc SCHEME( TUBE STEEL, OR SIM_ EXTERIOR LIGHT, ttP FRENCH DOOR COLOR: BLACK Bldg 11 - East Elevation ROOFING 01 SCALE VS' = 18" TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 11 - Elevations A R C H I T E C T B Troutdale Village, t.l_C. A19 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714) 557 2448 —lpao—om La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BS Garages.pin CITY COU PUBLIC H 14Typical Trash Enclosure Plan FCAI.� 1w • 1'.Q 1 3Typical Trash Enclosure Right Elevation ..CALETW= iar 2 SaroM Floor it 1 Typical Trash Enclosure Left Elevation SCALEYW- 1-0' ECTS 2 SecaM Flwr 2 Srwrtl Fbo, I d1 First Flwr -.S6 L_ DECPWTI'. fi EsTce � LIGHT. n'R Pool Equip. Side Elevation 07Pool Equip. Front Elevation SGALF-SW= 1'-0' SCALE: 3/1 fi"= 1'-0" r uni B HW Cat mh 25emntl Flow it onr,.mu 5FC+r.LLw�r ,R.aH--;` _ szT4ASE' 016NMGE 1 0Typical Trash Enclosure Front Elevation 5GF_E 0l1E ism a ,�i^iiila�rir 6 - 04Typical Carport Side Elevation - - l RFRRTS R � f _ — F W&9, FOR REFERENCE NCE PRLY I - - SiN,IL hR�DyoET.(GN ttil�CdfPiY -- - `�_ _ �_�> - - - - ---- - -- --~_-_- 25ewntl Flwr I LnEEaR�r<+E Er RIpRLPPT,TRP. ATypical Trash Enclosure Rear Elevation CTypical Garage Plan USf�ALE!+16'• 1'-0' REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES 0Typical Garage Left Elevation 6r'VALt u1V-= V-w .,,• 2S-w — , Fku DECORATIVE EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES 05Typical Gara�2ht Elevation GYALE 2 , ,'.- (j Tioaf Carport Plan _ REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES OTypical Garage Rear Elevation S:ALE21,5- 1'4r REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES 01 Typical Garage Front Elevation WALEW16'= 1--T -- •IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Exterior Elevations A R C H I T E G T 5 Troutdale Village, LLC. A20 245 Fischer Man- Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714)557244B www ipaoic.M La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7f26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BS Garages.pin L MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS .ING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS 02 View of Building 1 with Building 2 and putting green in background, 01 View of clubhouse from Washington Street main entry, OBird's-eye view of property. ■IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fm,,hcr Avenue, SUZC B-2 C-Il Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 -pao .— ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 03 View of pool area and shade structure r 7� 'G/ r o• • LEGEND • F7 BUILO:NG NVIABER Key Plan 07 View of Buildings 3 & 4 La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 04 View of garages and carports at north side of property OS View of rear courtyard with shade structure in center and surrounded by buildings 7-11, O6 View of carports near building B. 3D Views A21 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages-pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBI IC HEARING ITEM -NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTSP 10 View on Washington Street with deceleration lane on far left. See location of view on sheet A21 Key Plan. Desert Sage Apartments Paint Schemes Color Board DUNN - EDWARDS PAINTS Scheme 1 Scheme 2 Scheme 3 DE6242 Wells Gray Stucco DE 6341 Vulcan Accent Stucco DE 6172 Bungalow Taupe Stucco DET 597 Shadow Effect Accent Stucco DE 6207 Egyptian Sand Stucco DE 6034 Raisin In The Sun Accent Stucco All Schemes DET 674 Gunnysack Stucco 2 DE 6204 Trite White Accent Stucco 2 n9 View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountains in the background, �' See location of view on sheet A21 Key Plan. i VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS CARPORTS BY OTHERS COLOR: WHITE STEEL SUPPORTS & METAL ROOF, OR SIM. RAILINGS & FENCING PICNIC AREASHADE STRUCTURES BY OTHERS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. TBD COLOR: BLACK DE 6390 TRASH ENCLOSURES POOL AREA CABANAS BY OTHERS Chocolate Pudding 08 View of entry access On Avenue 50_ CMU WALLS METAL ROOF TBD Accent/Trim See location Of view on sheet A21 Key Plan, METAL GATES GARAGES SEE SITE PLAN FOR COLOR SCHEMES IRWIN PARTNERS EA La Quinta Village Apartments 3D Views & Materials Board .OIPA R C H I T E C T s Troutdale Village, LLC. A22 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 245 Fl,,Ie, A� —. sUuo B-2 Costa L1,— CA 92626 La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 (71a)5572aaB wwwlR-1- ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From BS Garages.pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHIT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS - _� - L1FF:HA1R;iLi:�M VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDINGS 1 & 2 �it'�i�',��j Ili•_-.[ M1IEPe�.'21CA1. F4JIFr, crrt VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDING 4 & CLUBHOUSE VIEW FROM AVENUE 50 - BUILDINGS 5 & 6 777 — BUCowo. WASHINGTON STREET SOLID WAIL FENCINGJ-•I•.m•.s- 0 V n4LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET TOWARDS AVENUE 50 `CALC' 1.E' • 1'a WASHINGTON STREET THL �f • amva A'81.� S v,�.>•ar srAc4 �i;'i' � , , RETENTION BASIN NEW DECEL LANE O�LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET SCAq�: VF 1 1-0' MECWNICAL EQUiPM1iEifr �_� . ILd -.... -. —mI6,"o •.QjmMLLFENCING E%ISITING SIDEWALK 1 LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - AVENUE 50 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0' 001IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Line of Sight Diagrams A R C H I T E C T 5 Troutdale Village, LLC. A23 245 Fischer A--, Suite B-2 Coele Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 1 714) 557 2448 ... IPee..eem La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V2 From EIS Garages -pin r CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS O 0 " 31 Feet Wide Uncovered `"" "'y —.— "" " —' I -- Assumes 6' High Fencing from Neighbor's Backyard UTILITY �eI PA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Site Sections A R C H T E CT S Troutdale Village, I-I-C. A24 245 Fischer Avenue, S.H. B-2 C..I. Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714) 55T 2446 www ip-- La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT D 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages.pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS SAGUARO PARK LOT ME Bldg 1 2 story 01 fTT; f UTILITY 'n -•r. ---- — --- f'' I yy rr e�j� Bldg 9 Old.. in 251 ry kmwy I Bldg 11 2 Saary o I FOOL vvluo Less than 2.5 Feet Visible Assumes 6' High Fencing from Neighbors Backyard Property Line — Residence on Saguaro Road 92'-1 V Landscape 33'-Ba o rt Line Average distance at homes with side yard . - _ I I T k I Carport Drive Aisle garage Existing CMU Block Wall Fence 31 Feet Wide Less than 2-5 Feet Visible Assumes 6' High Fencing from Neighbor's Backyard ��IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Site Sections la A B C H I T E C T s Troutdale Village, LLC. A25 245 FlscherAvenue.6uile B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714) 557 244E w ipaoc com La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V2 From BS Garages.pin CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS 0 0 ■LEI PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S �5 Fischer Avenue, Suile 3-2 C-, Mee. CA 12121 (714)557244E w I" "corn ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING Property Line 61-5"� Landscape 33'-8" L Average diS11111 of homes with side yard Carports Drive Aisle I Garage LExlsting CMU Block Wall Fence 31 Feet Wide Less than 2 5 Feet Visible Assumes 6' High Fencing from Neighbors Backyard 31 Feet Wide Uncovered Assumes 6' High Fencing La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 on Saguaro Road UTILITY Site Sections A26 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 7/26/2023 21014 La Ouinla SD V2 From BS Garages.ph CITY COUNCIL MEETING AQGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PAP2TNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS E D C a0 J Q U d s B Qz C z 0 L 4 7 PIXIUR T1WE .i' (hP� �rrTwE rT*E :�fTTr.j TtYTW[ TtpE'Ic IYTA•7 FlXOPIE T.•IPELA (TYP ) + GARAGE - CARASE K IO c71 1O 04. 6 45 6 1w $ 4 —64- -- " � y r -H � -f-c•{ i-FF F6i jot Hai Hsi V.-i R 4 . 7e BLDG - 4 PACI=S BLDG 1 .. T :r =D - PAD=51 0T .-2_Y i UMT- . - J m R?H�"di__v _ -FPT Fty • •lie t' _ sp FR_ CF3 - _ TRASH N '* .Mj: bl' __tommi kH Y+1 FFI JD —1p rf- ITT s �N BLDG 5 - I ter: PAD=50.5 s'Ir�a s sTo7 i 1c w:ITs - 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 5 I 1= �w TYPE IN [Di•.). Fl+TD4 TYRE—(1 _) I -14•Y rw TO, iTxP 1041411K'w.ITYPj .TRf,1 tT ) SRAGE GARAGE _ 1p LA 10 CH It7 0 _6 9 $ 16 0 4 $15 0 4_ I F� Fa-1 FNl-1 FW j•M.. ,Mi.. 1�1 FOi T,O-1 F'e-1 wa >4 1 Y D• 00, r Aj 1•0•1 - FOR FO.1 Y�R �i k•O-1 If E 'oEw -. -y Im Im 1ni `m k L_ g NLLY 9MEIDED k1irt engineering consultants OVOAD Leapa'C Nm.E Sun. A-,., Palm D CA MI Noll. BOP OF FlXNRE Hrrq••Ocblmc m )fD ]AOGWS CLIENT: THE ALTUM GROUP BASE C;rvuB YA< 72140 MAGNESIA CONCPEIE BASE :„l. Flm E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 OF RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 LIGHT POLE DETAIL FOR STAMP NITS LIGHT FlXTUPE TYPE 'SA' M BE MOUNTED TO THE FASCIA OF THE STNUCIIIRAL STEEL 1fjrylFjSII.� SOMO ..• `Y�fi InyPIE :WL '�tl' TO' l � Y BE.WNT03 m THE seL A n.TTpgl - d' SrpuOTUA+I 51F1E BY 5IRCB F - sy5D{NC.PI ixE l'B0PE11rr F1tOM /J119PAS Bw1>A� -vx rAmoirl. JBY BTEQ, Fl[�uNc TOP OF FINISHED f «ALE CARPORT LIGHT DETAIL NTS SYMBOL MANUFACTCNE/ CESCHFFrFON MOVER NUMBER AND NOTES FF'-II IN EXT m WALL MOUNTED AREA UGIT F.. NET LOCATION Y FL�-NI'OOpTRLC FT-IE0-04L-OO LISTED. MOUNT 0+2D'-0• AF,F, L9 INWSTRaS ETrTETpD11 WALL MOUNTED APEA U T FlI(BNIE WET LOCATION ® 4 /%WY-]-lFII-OIL-b LISTED MOUNT O +ZO'-0• A.F.F. ® TEAOH UGH MG E]fTEMpt WALL SCONCE O !'-B• pB,lOIX-Ap4519f1( A.F.F., WET LOCATION USTEO. ® (� 4 LSI INWSTOES SMALL BID SUM WALL PAM Iwn_i-OIL-30 MOUNT AT 12'-0• A.F.F. ® UWAN UGHTNO LED AREA UGIT YWNT AT NIEE-SOOSI-TI FASCIA OF CARPONT. FOi /SVe-AB-LED-BAOK- OIO - Y W' 'JAPFACE Yrt mO" ATTH P0.E ,-, LOJ LS INWSBOES /AAI-HID-OpL-SIL-z- UNTIED TYPE MOUNTED ON. TYPE 2 TOP 00-)OCp TO BE ATI 5 IN FINIS TO BE AT IS'-0• ABDVE FINISH OWE. ® I:I Ls IxousnnEs C"'" AAfA LOHr WNIEB WITH — 4 STRIWTION. TOP OF FlXIURE 7— fD BE AT n'-0• ABOVE FINISH GUOE 01EbGi AREA LIGHT POLE ,-, L61 IS INOUS1RIE5 f -HID-OpL-SL-SW-• MOUNTED MTH TYPE 5 .—BUTION TOP OF FlXTIIHE ]0-)OCRI M BE AT M'-O• ABOVE FINISH dA- CX Olt AREA POLE ®e Cal M INDUSIitlES p -HID-OpL-9L-FT- MOUNTED M1H TYPE FT qEr gSTPoBUTON TOP OF FlXTUPE ](H)WPo-IL M BE AT 25'-0• ABOVE FINISH GRADE 4 /SPBBX-.BW-I£D- LTG. bmim 91 4 HOLY pFRS-Ito-BUD-B2 LANOBCAvmC lR000 LG1 Tu �. �° �w•F,__l-0H I - 14-I.,Fq-1—t4L..1''+i F4-I ., i'!A•r . >•'o-'I. _ t-o-1 � 1-13 BLDG 6 = + PAD=52 0 XTiwE TYPE 51' (TYPJ SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.0 SCALE: 1"=30'-O" NORTH 3 4 5 +Rnvn �rcrW+G°' � 1 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE D APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT NW WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 C — ISSUANCE: B REVISIONS: # I DATE I DESCRIPTION DATE:11.10.2022 PROJECT NUMBER: 21.ALTG.003 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: A GUFR VL SHEET TITLE: SITE LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NO: E1.0 CITY POUNCIL MEETING AYGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PAR2TNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS E D L 3 4 GARAGE : zf•J GARAGE _i .-.-- i• .�, 10 a a 0 04 ra 0.. 10 vl K 6 5 4, 4l 41� �S �5 � � � � �3 �7 ['t �1 �i1 y � YrPE ec (rm J I • Ft -I (oi Mi... FW FW F01 Hrr FM Fhi }rH -Y '. _ -- •�R BLDG 9 BLDG.10 PAD=550 e — PAD=53 5 �� 2-STORY; 1E UNITS -� ; STORY , 1G UNITS - OOTPRINT 9SF FOOTPRINT-90003 cF ,, ye, } L CV - �il(ME TYPEec rlri) INT-904m SF 10 - 41� -1 • pp ASTIR! TWE eY•JrV.; qq Q V i BLDG 1 0 PAD=53 0 0- 3-STORY,24 UNITS 49 POJTPRIn, t0023=5: I � II cV6 Y 1 is �v I: BLDG B PAD=54 5 , ITNIE TYPE 3-STORY / 3E UNITS p} FOOTPRINT-1250� 'G f '� 5= �• 1? p / V � d S Y J 4f 4p PPT[R4 TRE'9! (TYP.) r d V RYu�E mf r [T*•1 rr 5 L 6 f_r t m engineering consultants Palen 0.Mrt, U V]II l A ioln tom I )EO ]CO.000S CLIEN THE ALTUM GROUP 72140 MAGNESIA E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 FOR STAI ED SITE LIGHTING PLAN NORTH LA QUINTA VILLAGE D APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT NW WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 li — ISSUANCE: B REYI"R P. DATE I DESCRIPTION DATE: 11.10.2022 PROJECT NUMBER: 21.ALTG.003 DRAWN BY: CHECKEDBY: A GUFR I VL SHEET TITLE: SITE LIGHTING PLAN 2 3 4 5 SHEET NO: E1.1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AWGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PAR2TNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS d 3 O sB r7 z 0 J� -nxTm P•9 +t (m) I1911 m r1P1: i'.' y31>'-T i iE _ RYNRL )1RL­TIN >>AIL T.rL xL-R1P.1 F'+TiPE 15RE yc{TaP.] Zrpg6 T1.E>s7' f�.1 n.1wt:'1meAn' (TYP) R.7w9,; Tyn I'v V.} nalc rrn- p]R] d A rtl?I'•w .YC At ➢a to Do. at. �-04. 4 � 9 p0 r ] vD " a0 a0 A¢ Aa Ac Oo 00 G.9 0..0 ➢9 P.i - a o.9 C.a ➢9 Rl: 0 L�a ¢¢ s.p Ot Co 7.9 0 A,o ➢A. A-a1�F�N-0..0 P.a--C.7 `P.0 iL� v-9 _ pp AR_am aq pv a.o.. oa.-po: ¢ .¢ p¢ 00;'aa Ro yqf A9 J24 A°. J4tlr¢4 AD AD. A➢_. - L A; az-z r.4. P.4 p.¢"A-v�..AQ'9,.7 i_Aa_A>s_pn_.Em::,p.R FL_ F_tl.F,➢.. �..A1 D..- AI r4 A.. JIA as I . i5,11 PD.ry7 a-Au:.ylx:.A�, po.:pn_ Ff:91�..A.a-An. A.c AID a.C_A.s. �_ IT. P.IY.}m p1.A�.: l.GE Gnn:. GE G:,F�.GE s .2-V p.9 PneAa A ..1 ..2 A. p, JA ..3 .3, r 16 '.dwi7.. J e+. A] J,7 J•a A y.i A] - 7 Gr. GFFl.GE ,a¢•p.➢ 6 ,oi A.Ia.z A.�o,e a. J.. r A As �e QA5 Q,4r, ,+� .'.q.^13 A2 AD i.° At ns a KOr.e 01 ❑ .1loin +�.1 ;Q 1-I . P° g.v:pl 'DI Ax At.. al ,1.8 J. AS ;:3 /:8 A7 .941JE o.390 J.pf T 1A ,1.0,1.¢ 4 LJS J�At 0.i �p Ja ()i� 0- J.. AT J.l Af � 9+'+ FI° .6 .lA J.FJ,u AA- ;-A7 J.e A -"---A A ,a A 1.¢ ;.�y. O.�.SC., A.9 Jr j•2 ; A4 AA AI A pl A.4 97 1.+ J: Av g4 .�.1'.A:a"' :r�-z'-:tea-A.r: 3v:",il� :T:] .Jr.. TI ].: ;A ,ts to l•+ i.2 Al .2.2 fir. Ai'i •-A.rx= i•7 r' -S .Cr'7A-," -7.a-J.¢ X5 14 .t,+-is'.A3 "xrJp W ' . :Ts.-T.e-;x ,- }s -.M Z]o'1:5 1-1 :. IT IT J.e , I � J4 ACA AT pJ A2 AD ,0.5 C9 1] J 'qj-a J.1 ZO 21 Aa 41 .4e ;.. 33 AO 12 .37 4e Jle A9 A6 '. .3.7 As Ji.l 1-1 .5.1 A.2.5.3 1.1 J.t A4 }i p5 .16 .29 4.e �A 3.7 A3 JS AM 4.6 J•4 ]] A8 .2.1 ,1,9 1A1a JA O2 A. � 4.7 ,36 J4 16 1.5 Jt 1.7•: A2A..-6 J: ,1A J. .J.0 X. JA Jo a.go Y Y �1.5.1A 75 AZ All J_4 4A xFA 7, 1i 3?.17. is )2 f.7 Al .71 J° Ac 1e j�1 AD .0-v A %i JA SA 1-.42 J.a;U AI-%2 Z.b'0J.P .1.9 .11 �.1-4 AA -1�-+ �• 7• i-s i- ..: .• y2 493.07 1-1 ,1 p ;.. 1.1 .1.9 J.2 r�r AR Ao p.7 ° 1 t:a-.J.Y :A 1.) r t 3 Rr FS A. po .0 +v I{?=1 1° i?�'`�".'I. ..i�1! '•� ;:�� ..T i'��'�J' 1iF�1 • ___A0 J.I A2 A.¢ 0.7 .1-1 JA .t.5 1.0_2 .11 .2.4 0 1.7 .1. pA A3 A 5 Ai AR..}D 1.1 1.4h.i-hT J "'a'1-8 J-° it ,l.p J.e E,1• 15 + 1 J.[ �.2 }] J-e 1. �qA7 p e p. A a a6 p9 A1 P S 11 J2 A3 1. -y.3 _01 J3 }A J2 J.3 Jae } 1-3 . Pa ,..,8L3 A,3 A.5 .01 a :' ja i2 1.3 .1 JA ZT2,. io.e `;69 1.1 j2 J5 1. J.er'.: ra 1. .] ,ta. _1. Q.. ] "'-pa ar ::2 p4 ,04 A: 4 -4 g1s Al .2.3 pA J-� JA ,1.t .,e°a2 R".Cp I" A°»P2 .0.3.0.4 p5 pe J.6'J2 A3 1.8 .t pf.t�¢ .J• "77 .0 1A JSM.5 pap ,n,1 Y• • ELDG t.o •9.e j 7 A4 AM .o' `��.o r.1 �60 12 Fo 4S p9 Al 2 ,1.{-ps ICE p.c ] O< [ '.19 .12.2.2 .2.5 .r AD-1t. .11 • A J.a•p-7 G .1.3 :i a9 1' of ,] o ,ls Y co PhD J A.R A. A P. a+ .1 p- 1-4a9.4 %1 2.. J.1 _o J.t- A44 1 S JA 04 A4 .07 1� E DG 1 - -_- F.J AM :2Y s1z Jo ;.e}„,e 1a JT AC A.4 �. - J.e Al .1.9 iS , 9 1 e _ P„D=51 O ,ve� . J.q w ; pv pA A.7 �pA A e 3 Zs 7.i 1 3 ,1.4 }e A6 , . � Atl1+ ."•' 07 :: _ •.� 6 AM ' J.e J.e .14 A:3. = A7 J•R . _ A2 �.o Ar Ra .ax-A q. 1.a I. 13 1p7 y e 1-2 AC A• is }' 4�1 Ao A.i .^..I ! . p.3.0.5 pt ,1-' I.e J-0 18 ; 9 , 9 j.5 1.7. ..:_: A3 ,1.4 41 8 I'" J• }.I 1.L­Q, J-' '10 10 J7. r! ag 4i1 A6 A .02 ..2 J.e-•15 ).4[1.7 ;CI 13 .1] .1.7 A. I J.) A¢ } pl of A; ,OS A5 P° :." 7 e..J ,A 0.9 J1 .1 .1.1 po h �} R� �A-7 ]/1+ Al JA. AD 37 Al 1.a iA ;o +SAA! 1.5 ,T.i f.y.� .0 JA ?a .112 / y .1? � .�LJA )5 �1,1 1) .2.4 ,12 ,3 V. A� U J.) pe ELI: S A°,.A•+. A.+ A+ $2 PS Al JV-j 94'JA - /:A 13. 5 i-2 J-3 yu, J34 y„ 3.a�.R ;'b ,1...2.3 .iS7�.7 J].i,a J.. ; . 7a J. �!o). Js IA ,4.1 R ].' a.1 ,"A AT p.i�l2 •9.7 ,1:4 • e� F=1fi ix, i.2Y,4.3 .4.1 y.0 13' Il Aa A74P1 A.1 p.. 0.3 AO £f 1.A�7 ,S 1A }5 b J.r Jy•°-,1�] �i. J.i %L G y4-9r'-2 )1.5 il- 1,4 1_Y J:T i-I As CS :'-: 11 ,1_' ,1.1-l.0 J.0 .t 7 j2 ;Ki 1S, �.l a.9 ,0.9 .tb ;so to y.] 7.... j.2 to .1A JJ A. `111 1i1 11 .. .. t, 02 A:3.0s p� 1] .1,T, „t.5 .14 2M 14 .1 29 /�CJ116 13 J_%Ap�k3,11.9 .1.¢ ,14 A. 'AA pQ 0.9 .1.1 .y$A ,1A ,T . ,IA-J3 ye p.t It 1s ,DA ,oe ,09 1,1 1A Ep.q,•p,1 ji.i P2:R5 P•7 .+7 7! s�r'-1-p t.v 1.3 1 J J•7 1J-Fi ZS y2-J.o y.v:.^J Af At t.o IA ,09 ¢9:yA JA Is ya vA J�_J.. t:+f Ja g.x y.i .t.] to ye •¢, #� PA J•� 7S-'.tay.•'J(, F7 ,a�{s }.a p.i y.11 Js:ja.. J-4.:1. I p.p p.l ,a.I p2 Pi p.7 a 1.A'J•�. J.4+ JA 'to A3 .0.})a i %.2-7 A7' J-. Fe ,iti :;qtp� ,1.2 .3.7 A4 0.. lit •.+5 ) •: :.-�:C P.1" �.+ ;.5'_4-5 ?_1 p9 R. '�1 .3l r.1: Fz P-0.,t.l� yIMN]j.s :i.i -i r.9 2z IA 7.. JM2� o.0.1 •• 2 ] e i,1_1 ,]'i_6 I 1 7 ¢ T1:9' �- A 9.1 A 9 A.. :y J. J• _; •_.:•. 1' 1 J- � j.2 J:i 1.1 pA P+_•=.a_ji�•lo.,is y.i. J.i J�1 An Z.1 }n J.° Ai 33 3..F,a p+ 7-" J2.vJ�i, .7t.t :1 J.o pii }a 1. p-a ;..21.1 IJ as-Jii 3.1 ,ta 4 4ib.11 .t 1 s 1 e,1.11.9 JJ J41z I..Lt- A i),+i p1 Y.4}1, p.1A 4i_2 1 .-- A A' } p+ r-] p• A5 AlFx R° : J� f= J•r . J� ?-� J }�:�-:. . t_ Ali° A. A• AI J. i-5 1- J�1 .0 ,c4 J,s pa J.4 as t.e Ja ,w-;i.5 -}7 Y J5 As At ; ' ',^.2 A) P 5 j e , , ." . i.T JJl .+ "a 4 }-0.1.7 , . '0.1J.. VA.., %%2•A., p5 AD 0.0 p o i;2 1.5 J.' yF __C' j.i: J? xa 'rr yi .'--a 0-; ,I.R .L2 A. i.3 J s JIa yv •i• f.a f,e .IA 15 13 J1 y.SoP s Al A: 3 F: A. 1.1 19 y a A3 A7 At Xa'• a 1.a 5 1.a J.) J.A 1.A J.. 1.a -.1 J 1 1.5 ,.0:�.3 .oA .0.0 am AD 13 fJ IA t.e J.7 1-7 J.i �¢ AD h J.1 J.2 }.t J.] j•1 4.1 Ib KJJ,s y,4"A+i's, th 1, AV - •J.1 1.4 .1.6 ._ _ 1A • Al it; P' A7 ]! J.a 10 p] J.3'.? 5 p3 A- JI ,4i J] :.1.1 J.r 'Js 1_.]�'ix J9 J-7 J. 1.2-"Aa ,Oo A,0 00 ,00 13 1.6 lt'( 1.0 pa J.A J:f As•, 1.) .1.4 .13 1.) ,t a0Z.5 J.p A,4 !. J,1 .] j-i JA jt J6; A9 J.3-T.O 1.1 ,1.4 J.e , 'Fp 4s 1J.0 AA .2-i 3•• is i4 �T V 16 ",1 :.i .1 C :A ;.p 1: ¢ i�4 �: ,.a AE-Aik ° 00 p 1 S. 15 x .>• � 9 �r.4 " r tQLUS A P J J-5 . + . :-1 :3 A.. J.. +. �t �0.e z ff!Fs P.t p.T p.t Al ,o.t Pa F°'. Ja t.o ::+ _yp_�.a p.. sa >•.r 1a ,LS ,1.1 Jr .J.s p.1 ps AA.° . p �y.f. J.t ;4..S• j,A J.s 14 1.. 0 1 7 .1.3 1 _ ..I. J.2 •.. -t J-5 i' '•i) -A P•0 go-. 1d J5 ,V ,1.9 pa .XZ A6 j..e rt j.r J13 J-4 iA WO Do .0.1 .01 ,. 1. At Aa y2 1.1 J.s ,Le A+ .23 A4 -.1.9 J 3 ;A_i. Ill p-2 A7 AD - j•t p.7 A3 A3 P/ J.] J.a 114 AT A.] Al Aa At. .I 10.11 .e :i • 11 J a .: • .1 = J.e J-2' JA AS 1.7�.,Ai _�G o • 9 .1,1 1.e AS -AD J-5 24 A. i= :e J e J-5 .i.s Ja..y.e .1.1 � 1 J: • 1 J J.4 .2.8 Al2.2: 1.7 JA J 1 ,9.e P s A • . � �_... a y� 1� J.3 �f" ,a1 At p2 p, A. J.0 - 3 .+-) 1-7 � J-s .17 1.v _ 5 y4 AD y It ,t.9 p.o A a 1"6 Al J•.4 AA A9 A? A 0.9 .10 "A .1,4 'A p. J.e 1-5 7.. 15 JA 1 9 .1 . J . ,'a .11'_J.o' A? J,7 ELDG T.Z u. 11.6 J.7 22 A7 1s �.n PAD=5 �V0 6{' L. AD pt Al. A1.P3_p.4. Ai IS- Fi_J-5 1"3 J2 ,a. 5 Am-. % P_2 AA .>3 A7 A- J'-I_.?a :ie A-Fid i;l �'v oz 13 J. J,3 ;1S pe i'i ; .�1 A-. to .51 1 ] as J.t " L-i ;6 11i � ,ssl• ".a Ja�{f.l-1-4 13 19 " .`i..t5 Js �I.r,.r .J� J•1 :,T.r 7 Ae°r 5 13 1c'=9Cd.�Y )¢:J-O.ti-¢`1a..7-?'?�J.r ,i i y4 }r g) J.v J.E RP .+Qf�J4 AS ]-3 Jb J- Fipr y,I. 1.: ; s J.3 y5 ,I.e = IQ .ts I.4 z ,1.a ya 1.6 y7 as y.°-J.a'C� p-0 A. p.l PI Ai-ps.,., iA-.AYt 3.? J3 ;.] y.7 a A, j.0 JS t4 iYf.+ J.i J. -,i.E. j.d��n �.) ,t.5 ,tL },5 ,).e �y�3, J. ,ia y1 r�s•.10 }t:.to ` �J] Js ,0 J.9 ,,.1�7L-p� ..5 7.��. .1,s .1.1 1.5 AD A•9 ,�i p.A a AD 9.0 _At. A+"P•Y_Jl➢ya T11 �'�!�' J■.e a5 r3 }n J.h,1te .1.1 �,1 ,Lyt .,.'j .ii, J.R Avlp i.VQ3'K' a%.�-Q .: .J.7' 1,4 1.1 AC il': Y^I 1.• OA qJ..2 ,t.l 1.2 i_1 .1.714 11.7 JA J.!�.1.1 AM Do Pa Az ps AA J.7 ,ia A.+'p+ Ja .1s 1A � }4 J.1 Y� i' e }:, - s J � s 1 XJ p .+•r-J J.3 y.Y ,7.Y ,t.7 ,11 AD pE;p.t Al A3 p,7 JS re'A.•4�JTa-x.¢ .14 .1.1 1 ..9 ..1-2 ELDG 4 iA J-5 A6 ,7-1 Jn J�° yx ,0 1.6 1.4 p4 IS %T F6 10 1.9 'At p0 Do Ji..,AI p3 A51.0 J.IC A. V j5 .1.1 1.4 ,.• AS FAD=51 0 1v a - A. 1a 22 3,o A.v ,tit �.7 A'i 1.p J5 J5 J-0 1+1Tp7 A7 p+ AA ,oIt ®. .0. AD AAA+ .F* A° 1.4 ,�.: la wI:jT i,, ys 1.3 4 J3 .m° .._ p.s J.1 yr 1.r J.e ,,,3,i ya. c yi Al 13 1.1 Am x2 AM pn V ,p. oe a- P.o- Ao A., 0.3 a e 1.2 7 S ,3 R-4 12 1.4 . a U AL Ai J,T J�J.) $ ,La ,t,. 1x .Aq. Ai J;S.A a JJ J,r .11 0 . J-z ,u 1.4 J •41 J p: A5• A.6 ,0.7 n n A 9 ,t 1 A .po IP.e'At•A. p2 X4 A.r .0 A4 17 .2.6 J2 IA , A, J.i ;vA F:] i•R Ap.R4 1s �v ?? �L ',v. }�j77 1A i.. ,i:• ;3 0A 1� Ja ;1.1 JA 11 ;1,0 AA A.'y.z .0 Y.p.9 tJ:.L4 Ad7s J•i i.I 1.7 .4.0 33Al As',°.s ,0.5 A.) p.e J.n J.2.10 Ap •A9 F.I ip.i P.1 p.e 1.l 1 e iA AI AD 1.3 2.1 ' 9i. 2.1 20 .i.1 Aa J.. y.r : J.v ]AS`J X..L7 J-? .t:a. 1.1 1~t "1 .l La � ..Le J.7 J.7 iA J4 J.s ).4 is .12 ,1.2 J.. ,o.e AS D.8 AA ,IL 1.1 .11 1.:. ,i.I JA .J.A 3.0 JA J.4 1.e JA r3..4 r � A. pn f pe a.c A7 p.v Jf 0.- . pA aA AS A+ p.a .0.e 1.6 1.f A,e 2 Ar A4 1.1 RJ-) 1-T 1."+liWF7.4W ;,*-a, . 'F° .7 a 1 AAZs'-SI-11:r 3+Fdi-?.F4:T aFa i�fP�1Af><°-:-x *6;IFT 76lJ.71:AIR J:?HSA J.a W47-TF:�f 3e"A :�"?-v 71 10 J.5 1a'.T.9. Fq Pe .0.7 .07 AJ y .1.3 , • .0-¢..?o.F•i . f+ ?-3 AA JA i f-j-�+'•:7L-a V4 12 ;J AD po P.y: p.2 AS At AA 121 ] 1 .11 .2.1.] .?s d3 -ai It .1.1Ai A. AA AD a-+ ?a A3 A? J o 29 .14 .3.0 .10 _A3 As " A0_3 0 1.1 1.7- A3 Alf�a Aa A3 1.9 1P 4 .1.9 1.. ,�l J 0 Fktif.-yT J-a '-9. AD ,g9'al pr A.3 a.7 1..I.1J J ° )] ,1.7 ,I.e J7 JLr"J3 AM ,IS J.5 J] Ae�S Ao. A3 1,7 1. 32 , je 3. 7 4 AN,3A i.4 p.a:'3 .13 �}a }i j4 m.: A� ],3 W,5 Al 7.5 3rr}a A. r'2.,yr-;1:i •,t9� .1. 1a J.) ,I2 J..- Le it j3 3_0 ;, ➢ . r/j5 �1 J•3 , .Do A Ai..Ai p2 P.S J.➢ .1 d;iw .x8 15 ." i. i� Ji IT a 1:3 11.2 .'.1 J.0 1.I j.l 1.1 JA J.v J.1 y.A ,+, J.5 J.5 j.5 j.9 ,tl d 1t J-1 17a .L7 1-2 J-7 J:6 1.1 1.3 J.1 .IA J•? JJ J.n 1.0 1A J_j 1.1 _.1 .l.o 1.0 j.t 1.4 1.B ?0 JJ _J _2 J.v 4T.2 A2 ;.11aj�1 As 10 JA xI 1 Aa yp.o 3d p, .4O2 ps J' ,tA t:e j0 12.2.1 Z3 J4 2.0 ,1a .7.0 20 y .10 .13 J.e i 12 J.i 1.) , 4 12 15 1.7 ,W 1.9 1.9 1.7 J.8 2-0 1,o j] A) A9 A6 JA JA .1.5 1.11 .42 J2 JA 14 1.5 18 12.2.1 1•) 1? 1.2 3.0 At JS J"¢',15 JR 1.O 44 J.7 -a 13 ,{i9. A7 � :. Aa'p.o p.o AI 0.1. A.z A;4 �r-;a 7:i Ar /.1 :4.i. ,V�,a.1 }4. ,Y9: a.71p2 6,4 A4 Y .AZ.W ,,7 4;_ 1n - _2 •�4.i A.o A . J.t ,t.e 1.9 J.3 A3 e•L. Ar. Ju'�.0 ,a.:p.s: i•° A{ .7 }s.J•5 1.e 5Ad s.>. A. J_i .796 S J-s uA,1 .+. 1A� �.1. 1.4 1:o J.o AO t,1 .:. XQ,%W.o A•°'A1 A+: P2 D. AA AA.J.z .12 A�.a7.�J.5 1e A 02 0.3 2 33 ,.p J3 A3 1A A2 .29 ,32 O.B b.05�2 .1.3 AJ 2.5 J2 .1-9v.9 p,4 "&5 O; .10.2-5yz .2.7.2.7 28 7-7 ,S.o A9 A9 AA J.n 3.1 J1 ,]2 2.5 A2 p7 32 A4 .7.0 �.Ae 3.P5-5 ?J Ja 1 A4 J3 ,.1 J"4 , pa A¢ AM At A Al A2 p5.P7 AN¢. �Le-M?"t._. ...i'3'11..I" �,.O.eH:.e ;.ads-1.1'1.r 3b 'JA'J»TF=�7.. 7- �A*..�F�!t.c �J:1'�i•-, ��'?i ; �I.i. �•i'!tl 1.e ��:'.JS.�,t.r•,'.$'�y1.s !ii yn� V.:,". J2 p_446,7.011}�4 Al A° a�4.3 }L3 .1 2-; 'A"M'PA AD A0 .0.1 .0.1 At A9 Ap 3 A4 p5 .0.0 ...1.2 J.3 y.3 J,. 111 }� .1.4 5 J. .4 J . .3 4 .1.4 j 6 ,-01 Z4 7-5 jT 2:9 :A5 11 As J,r J-5 a 1a k.,I .1 6 e .1.6 isA 1 tyx iv pn R�e A. Y i..0. 1 -. y!.1 0..P...a AA Aa: As RS A.1 A, X.0 .AQ/ l: ,1 - A7�% 1-1 pu;p.o:P.pRAa' Ap A.0 a 0 J., a3 'pa 9.2 p3' P• .A.7 .1 .7 . tLl -0 ,a1.::p.{. 3a A �0•' ] J,�;L4 S .2-11�.9:A5 .21 P:] J.7-J.3 :A .1.1 '1.¢ Qn A ,. '-9 4' 1 s .-.a An v AM �o .0.0 .0.0 .00 A., As ,o., ,02 A. ,00 w, As J_o 4 0 6 e .i A2 � R 3� 1_ A Aa P P P•9 ;J.a J.¢ P4 ;RD pp Av •Aa A-0 Pa ito A.0 ,aa a 0,0 AA, ,o.o 9 .30 4 o TL Lt9 ELDI' J ELDG 5 -iz A A 1• R .J•Y- }¢ .r 'pv ".0 14A° p,o'p.o ,O.o Ap1pn�•p.a o.o ,0.o p.o A. FnD= 0 „ }A jp7 r.r. to v wv x - ps •� '1• 1.2 i- JiA }.t��J.i 1A ,1.11- 1:7' J. ,Y,r"p,6 ; 4 At $O:I n-pA on 0.0 ,O.a pk ?.o .0.0 .0.0 .0.0 p:o ,.,O A.s a.7 y..1, J% j.¢ A-1 F.b F-� .1.7 ," " 1 ,oe 4 - _ . 5 gg1�4'c4 1- St. R : pv p.o pa'pv pa p,o A.o ,00 ,Oo pa ,00 ,o.o p.o p9 J.. i+..::.0 12 T.1 A, � �v yz q p.�.A.s ;2` y7 A.2 02 JI .A] j A° A° A? Ap A4-'A� J+w P? P9 Ao Aa 9 S�•AF A? J-4 J-6 .0 1A J-z :,5 1.a i 5 ,*.�, •A;1 AP.-r:'. '." FCK,opo.s ,A p1 ,o,o a.I`ALS 4 ,a.' AA 0.0•p.➢ tp tm Al -A' -At. A+'P.+' py..1 :, 4 .no AX AM pA S? A-0 Ao Ao AD A•°.." 7.0 � AS A° Pp Aw�] A p•t lv p0 A.n�g7 Pt a.v A.o,AW A� W j-o Jlrye pA to a9 a ps AD F.x�I sm A., pc,p.o pe AD ,00 go 0.0 po AP An. AD AD 1 .. _ ea.00 aA PP ,sv p.0 Aa I4A p.¢ pp P-o po'jtiv'J'-0'pA Fa AD Ac )IV A J:o A.c'A:o: F➢ yd:psp,n A.X'.wljif p. A7 JaA AS A3.-p-Ir P. z AI AD A° R°.A.•°. A° A°•. Fa +'.° Pc p.A SA f-0.AA as AD A.a p,4 PA ; .po An pb .114 A4 AD 12.0 AA 0o AA .oA ,o.o O.D AD V0 A.e A.1 � p,4 A._ _ - Ao 9° A9 A1r A A•P vq Av-Aor Fn A_ gvr A. -AO, D.¢. FL{ Fa " =. - _ _ _ .1. z_ TPE 3r[rP,1 L 8 L I rtm engineering consultants avxev t�a si,00l, sne t,-l0i vmm oo.on, c;, G3211 n�aapro.T 7m.]m s CLIENT: THE ALTUM GROUP 72140 MAGNESIA E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 EDR SiAR'7 QSiR � tyrm 11 „46'FC I.xun9-.4 eu oILC_ A fe2x1 29 (7) SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN -3 NORTH PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT NW WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 - ISSUANCE: REVISIONS: q I DATE DESCRIPTION DATE: 11.10.2022 PROJECT NUMBER: 21 ALTG,003 DRAWN BY: CHECI:EDBY: GUFR VL A SHEET TITLE: SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN NO: oLL7 E1.2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 -1LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS 2 j Fw H - A. p ptr pp po po Rp pA pP Atf p•B 6.0 PO p9 g ne R9 p0 pa an p.�^a.0, n pit. ya.yp Oa. AO pp' R¢ ¢¢ z,¢ -¢ pv nq -¢e n 60 00 pn pp. pn k0 AR Rc ¢A 00 DO p0 _pA. p.q OO Gn en .01 Rti A< A • F� _aJI &7:A)'"T.A:3•II A¢: P1:p-[•` T An ?z An ?7 k7i.FL: � 01:0 ?:Aa 3(tl atr A 7 y�:Ra J:o pm A-c-A�. lA J� sA. Ao A e 1 s r . 1.: i 1 0- �. �j GARAGE �' F• { Ju P•G A J. W, ;1,! .1! AO_p_.Ap -_� ^Lu;pe GARAGE X•�e �..-e__ 1 0 6' Ba ! ] ] 4 �y so, s P P �'� . P •ii :cR F P A A F•1 AD SQ AA Ap jRT " . '� 3 ] lcm .0 0 A�•5,f 'Cb., �P.o PA ,p.o 'p. P.o jid i.r J •. J.e 6.0 • .c: F t A.1 p.c a J �° .y[ �E a[ �r _ _ V' P P. .B jz jt ,I A J. ,12Pj Y jtajw2.]x,1a ,1.0. ,41 ,1.9 }w J-5 A ja J.1 y, jean .A-r ,- A i s � A J,i A As A, A ow.,, - E.I�JW-•jf•l�l�-"f,R _E ec I-) i7.T 41P._?a": c .Fa ;,:Q' J.1 ,,.. 1) J.0 J.9 ,M ,, Jn !•7- J:r'?:,�:1.7 J r yY t-Js 7Y ;;, J- -.[ - J.a J.. .1.1 2.1 J., :' .e'aA 227 A, I A A Y j• ,1. Ja .0.8 P.z .00 A.. .1.5 Ji .17 J e .19 Al ..3 4..- ,. J.7 33 ;A ,. . e AJ 34 J.! :.I J17 •9.7 ..: '17 j] J-i Ju j! AD J.3 A_f 7-7 r] 0:0 J.3 JA }J 0.9 Al AA J:.3 PA fs 2-1 l ,t.e JA " 7J j]. A 0.9 P.3 ,e.0 P•a JD ;.. J J �.: A.7 Y A] 'i3 7 A! L. jr j4T AN je .1.e :+ 3f T • J I : IAA N A¢ :.a }e-.&) ;@.JF1 A' J-i I-� ,s-+.•A,'..�.,ia y� 1�x.i..y. JA'J.. ,t t J 1 J a Ja ja .. ,1.i P-f A= .at' nenax TYPE j -e J• ,1.a J.f P,1s .,1."6 y.�r ..4.r ,}�i1.] 0", .1�.. , '�1.. �yJ3 ,1�St J.e i� Jy F7'7.i J.! P.'j�p.! 4v ¢1 ..J�']>2 Ji" j�1 �t.R .12 ,1.a Ja j5 Al J.a pe p., u J.A 0* 0. "}# J f .19 ;12 • .1 ,1.s :J.r 1. I J.'i J J. ;.e. J.¢ ,: J ) ] ,1.. J-x _1s-J b„J., a,p p5 F4 a i.]:J.y. Pf..+_r. i11 J e .f.7 JA Al J.n 1P.4 P.( St•'__tp'.� ?�.•x �4�`.c R `Y A-0.2% Ja y.e yi J., DA CIA JA A' J3 y.o J� BLDG 9 Js J. 1,6 ; z ,A BLDG 10 J.p PAD=53PAD=55 0 y,e•.Fx As js P.o Js ,m J z AD as WI i5 5 y 7J..I3�� d-z A7 �'FmTaRc;_�-s wsc IF EeOTaP.r.:) e,.;.:' sc J.7-,u ,Rel • 4 J-) Ja J:! Ai ,t" .0 J-i S;e J. a-;L a �� j: _ J.�].1 .J.x �1 J o _}e yp �.,1.a Fa •y}. p .1.0 ;.1 J.3 J.5 ; A ,1 ] J 4 = .1s J5 .13 J.o J i 0 4•I.3 P 1 J_ ,LR i.x J:s All �.S-i•. J] � .1LSr.! y.T :.. j:l '7-S �rWi }1 JS "A 3� eJJ3-AJ Fe J.R y�1 J.. �-✓f 0.0 Q ,A Jx .13 Jz J1 .1.8 ,u P'-¢f •., J.. A' Ar'.�1.J4 2-' �5' -'I Ja N .1A JITWJI.1 J.p. J-v- • pa J.1 •t. , p ,io J.1.Js ,1� R• 7J N, °I J.I T� 4. •®¢ AM:j" 3 J• � A' JL P• J J A.IL: %5 J$. n:1 t! F•. ,1 o J x r J,. b, . i r C' .1 1 ,1.e f j[ rJ J.. y.e J.] J , I ; : ,19 ''.s „ne �J :' ?a AA ,ca.'j.q Ja A' .0 ,n.e pe J.o .'.7 ,e,: J-] A..Ja J.' P3 as Jam.'T. ps J.e J. ) J • a .i 3p - �. J.x J.n A. pn ,n7 AT o.) P.e p7 pt J.+ J] J.a'• w ,T }lY]RBE TYPE BB (TYP) .0,Ae pe ,o.e Ae Ja ,,., .6k :. a.As J•1'A* Y A+ j_ f }> > ;A 7.. J.e P'r Al . q CIL. J- Ae jao:e Fe J•- J11 P.) At J., ; - 1.0 ��,rJ.t,... J_Y J.e" A3 �� P:. ge JA Ja pB Y pa JN L. AJ Jo-r 7 ` J.i J.: J.x Jsf FD .,.Iy p"" Ji b 7-- J.1 !A ' 5 'Z4 3, ya-7.T f.. j. ,1.A y. R. r A• W Jn ,_v �� _ :,I j, ,s.3,+t}: Fa J.f }? l.. 3.a J} ?3 ,Lx J,1 j[ u j.7+_• Ja J; ,4.2 ,1 a,1 7 .e .7.0 'Ar J•] J} At F•r p1 jp A, A7..0 .'A .0 J J.1 :a 1 A. ,1.¢ ,1.e Y Ir J.. J.¢ J-*e .N Ps J41 a BLDG.S �JA J: ' ,] J•+ 'l �1'p.. j. 1. 1a 1 P. - I. Jq Js !e pa 2.4 3A A] p,T AS }a J.r ,r.r ! B .1a J:7 J.1 Js PAD=54 5 y.x 3--J:R-,..JLp.e j.x >a:. PTi J•p J•1 J.�L A�< J.e. i5 A-, Y J.I J.a As AN J.1 j5 5 JA ,1n A, P.1 nYnac )YPE s.'(TrP) P,7...A P.-.yl..,u IA JIA Ae.0h..9 an J LcoiPRIN. i:. E00_'. i F J AlJ J• FT Fe • .I P. .,13 JA jx .Lp',L. ,1a .1�e a J s. o s. a,�•y p:e A. J.< JA J.1 J9 Pa 11 :7 PT A. ,1.1 I Si. .va..5 .'a� s jn 'X. J.J J-z Al F'+ �%; . Al p J.? J.e: P.fxp3 >¢ J•3 .,- .0 AN P-f J 1 J-� ..A.f 'X_ 1 }! ; 9 }.1 T-1 jai .2 It p7 • '- J-rJ,ps .AQ J.1 A.- !.a !: J[ P]AD .�R ;.6 ..]`1Y.! ,1.1 Yjl jJ ¢5 2p'v ! 3 I ; n J.q J , a[[yy. rN yyA ,Le Jx J. j,.p A.1 AJ J.r : a J-f py.1 ] Ad }x .I. j3 J. PA Ai a J.T }� . • A9 y'z `h>t 1.! IF iV }. J.. A. J.]}'c0 /s J2 J1 J•T ?� P-+ T^ 33 A A aja.� Ja Jiy tb. }A,C�,1.3 f iA .1.e �,a . V a .i�•� 35 J.! Jw J.5 jf j) '�0p'0., s J['•;.] T3 ay p:a p► .eu JA s -2p Ae A7 J.4 -A AA ye j+ WC ,u ,x:...1 .Ja ..3 A.: c.L��. % `9`. �' Pv J 1SA-3 ,p JA Jx J;�3+ . ] }7 .1.] )�aP �51 f5 z't.i ja A. }��1. JJ fi• ¢�-..L=�3.0 6' �3II r At . ,o.o 6 y z ya .r ylf xe .v 17.. ul j.a A- X- J t J.3.1r Ae J •.o ,�! ? ] J ] 7. ".P-e J.f J 3 Al Y Aa :-Bt� ] }s !•r J 6 JA p3 p.1 .•� litl J:e ,+.5 I.e j, F1 e ,1f J p• LE J.! > Lz » .1} .+a Ae A 111�y, y i. ra11s. TWr sK (TYP.) Pa 13 5r.1 sf Ae'I.B 7.1 yn je . y.a J-f .3-2 r'-• F• At .B ,t • 3 JA J.Y J.3 .t-a 0A J �� •eA J. J.x J.r Az J)A Jbi, .j. J � J--.9 Y�. J.1 P";: .= .�T LT A3'x J.I J.s Az.1.t s J:5 j.7 AI At AJ , .p j.] px is Ar ,,f ja J:a Ji'J.q JL J.¢ ,L] Fi! j3. Am J.: A' J.e A¢ J¢.L l'. }]J �L' 'I, j., ,1.1�6 A, J.a 3A Js J.J 7.1 T-i JA J� X. As 'A,J"�Y ..: .was Jl.. J:3 } . JA ].e J1 J± yf J.1 i-� .ti ]-A .;) J. ':•-J-• is AN - $+ J1 ,xp ,1A A. jiJa J. pe A+ AA Jo Xds if�. Ja J:] ,1.1 �,.. ,��7, J�. JA A. �Y Ja . F:' p.J A. is 0.e "A .1, ..o Ai ;A ,13 J �.I JA �,x J:4 ; b It j: J.1,-i AI J AP-1 1-] A' P., p•J A.k ,tA Jam' Jd J-p J¢ }:.Js T }a }. ;4 i,3 Js J.9 ,i z J_9 JY r.a Pz JA4tA [ ; 'r j3^3�i1-v. , 0. --":T1rc-owl 'fL'J ', ... J Ja"'11Y:4 j.3 P.? j.1 j2 }A pJ 24 a.s a.s Pe AM 211 Ai AS ,+a J.] J.1¢Y�pz, . ,.- o.e ,ae Pa. j�' Ai Af At y.* j) Ai }I Al AR AI As J.B J.1 P.r As [+z Pa a J 7 ji .2.,.J.) JA : ..: . r".T A-n F.] -AT '�� Az A� F ?x A?. A7 A•4 P4-P?"P� &i'p.a L s L ktur t m engineering consultants 3VlN La d s¢ee1, sure A-101 Polm Dme¢. CA V1111 rh,gvttieln mm I )lO 510 Gp65 CLIENT: THE ALTUM GROUP 72140 MAGNESIA E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 EORSTAMP F4 Qite3 v¢n. rl SITF PHOTOMETRIC PLAN _® E!J SCALE-V=3R'4' NORTH r- PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT NW WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 - ISSUANCE: B RE65L.`1E:: ^.aT! InFt;RtP710N DATE: 11.10.2022 PROJECTNUMBER: 21.ALTG.003 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: GL/FR VL A SHEETTITLE: SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET NO E1.3 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PAR2TNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC w 0 E m F rvC, a Q o ti z E ;3 Z tEo E D C B Le.Wetl 6r ..rr - . Mirada Medium Wall Sconce (XWM) wall Sconce IK08 TEAfUq[s a sv[CIr-iuYlorys anMn•.amn .xt4+:o:••.m.1►.,ti.- .»..w:N:.i:w:+.:A t .. "I.m�e.m hmrNnv cw=:�:►.":er�ae•n _." r:lwar. r..t-.eA >n.ee�.a.: tvX�r`w'ac.e«�a��l'u"m°,r�m,:l;e9.nce ,�r.b. ="•mma w.'iniw. .rr< tw rroee«n •nulUSea wo.�M � ce+stne�unnon xr r Q,p•mrey.r.x..,� •aw>.+�.��rc �.avc `r•[,w«c",a -la,a�`�el.,�.nt�r�c..[:«ao..l w`i;:. M Nran:�nK �e Leo, morrntmbr.e�.IKde wallah. v .r":r-, rt. ae rRt.,.art_ew. ro,m.a im Optlulsntam �'°' -IL l. uLex en e_rlvm vY�ra - �dm_rriprs+c,vv"n-•t r� e w�cal clamber rnl iee `a�� u�rrr[a la e ren..•e mrm. [rT, oa lnmm. e. m1.• apls� z mad. �:ncs<� w �e„atv,•a rp,t o� .i"vroti er• eMc[rkel ` 3 6a IaWIIRUS QN lNhh Trs11.4:.: avr well knrvc. lnl.vrn L_ U,utl ••» LI Tv,o Riw ,l ,rr nhnn.bn. rrre aw.aa Ts wNnr nrn �flr nl r.a m.nrr•a ola ss �.h hpN vor�pn w.{Ir.,aX 11pM lewu un IIN rI _.a eumlrryknMNnM L'T bminrq � `�,.nrre wa.pnr so]LIu Awramtrtn Ida Mrvbrr�dav"� ocy lL- va-,1 aaao NeuY or.�rp„ar h Sb tR 78]937.]0715 InbM1 Optbm • N �ral6v"m • sears a.✓. Slim Wall Pack (WPSLS) Small LED Slim %A,all Pack RoliS `� nra.rna�flrul• QUICK LINKS Zrir=s runmo a sPACIFIGrLQN= Cenrtnu[bn ktilell ea�or onrmla cpwe,rallnp .,a„r-,.ab `� •m ePa.anb� - ..-• ,•..: �� .r.•"tr a.n"yT•.: � . lovv,:.neae a3�y.rs..rreytaaa.3 wK.m ' n.[enetlen a.w•71rm.a"c'"n�rNte re,+e 4'Wr`9'r zp" rnm mrr bvrtnrn •Ww+reNwans a]vvt xlr-aes r.'n[yc 1 c�.v:rsc as waran , rrn.M1elrneie»zre:av •ta..•,..y l .e•�53,G.•,:.r paxw raytcwnvrtowr lm m.reottoe; wcv:m ..a mwtraW 6mm Mro.xell +emIiahe. ��ec`.a nn•. di— 11LcTm •..,. 1.a , ,o,o•a�a' om 1e,:v _ -ae.o.wes. rn �:.•e,[�,. a.:: °, :°� �,� 'c�:nr:,r.n.Ia�l wavr.e tarale.rsnmm "•. xa1r�� 'iheoca' A.srar!«r •Yrr.u. WItC. R.�rbp�a. a�u.-e+vxplv,� rocLt" M.aaMaa wm. .�nmmnz�.pxrpa,a— a .t>..�„n.r.�r,...Ym.>o:r., 5 L 3v. . r .. . dFresco-na t''"r�.as "� :�I-Ihh, ht In1?,G cr5LED !,'1=maluminum RG21'Jc]p3t1c„i;h .. -hnk slstem5 r.r .. .v __:e ID h: 6 holm LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE -BA- AND 'BB' (MOUNT AT 20' A.F.F.) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE -BC- (MOUNT AT 6'-6" A.F.F.) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE'BD' (MOUNT AT 12' A.F.F.) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'SI' (SIGN FLOOD LIGHT) ULEE-30021 AfAAF yos Leeds 6 Large Surface Downlight LIGHTING USA e•dlnp pert•r„unee Mlnimelat roan, n[[ne pewerNl am nvlMe ngmmg too1u � mleen. beeu,Kvl surface well flnum l0or 1, wl .,,,; ryc..enerlry Pmaegeewwaoop wmeneaea at mhmv etnneloRy. R .. - range plsmall, iquart antlrMangula[AM -„-„•, ,, _..,�,� am,d wallmoumetllumlwlres,wmopuansar - upvartl or tlamrwartl 11gh[ dlslrlbuuom. Itlealy to.,Ighale[M1ewad In honor daea ana se11 well antl for llghl a< real surtee using -mn nl4•rry M'J+Tr.t ttn,� It ry. .,a ovbl,nr.rq*.1rm".:aed:..dt.a small web is a.all.ble h 3 drcterem ebeeane in pmbinahons m d-, up or uytlown lyhl didIrl— TM1lsf ure u[Illzes .1—tmhmlogr, meaning meshintyr,mType Lu.m Iv av mM as +...,... •.,. .�......�.. � to sa M1abrrtl tldb ig well az buibuuonz lt lM1e tles9^ers Uslrrg [M1e wcrovos oRlcs allmn fa very vritle ar- °.,,,�•. rti •�•••-...ter lxrlect unRamlry antl code romplianc I-, ng tomaundrg M1ngh[r«bz, wnlle ,P High, i. Y �S The Leeds has been IDS Durk., cenrhed for Ks _ or 30001(a bs.. T E C H N O L O G Y - —n�amtd� a.— p LSVE1 IF-d"...-i Pmduc, D-hpUm T1n tsva. a r,.cw mrnmaro.,o.a..,rm.,,,e w.w lred barnw 1r b M..1 nm:+s-za�Fwrr.s..e.kP� !far var�+r:u•rrrv•b kan mMunnmmw.a �argednwenr Tin Lsva /.t an nlarrrry •sewn nrm_eun,wp evn m ro ss up.e w• - ._.._... Appl1 Imps r sw.R. r.ao.e um eb •rr vEwuww nm asgr . pwy W w« F�..aavrw4 • 9bb•d ,-svA ✓wd•+r mmee tov5 mN k.v ,srw �rvlo-td.lm:1 reawroe opaan. •'tv Tmn.rrol�l emrswvs Opecal srtem a eµ. maw — —errprea n rrq. alnamT•rar Vo.saarMud0ltry Sn.m audeu leas ouwwt M.-frog Omvos� .rsm rmmnNbau.emerbNtrarwrwuxrq awau mwaN gMrmurerN vam a-pn.rr.�awr.rre�vtdrrnawrrpp,usrn ne enrt."wr melr..rre rrq vw Gonawctron �� �-- F1�nah Toss uPaln �rn.ler.aV� } Eledrial I �-^_ 1 J rtrd n tEd�rmd.a..n hSP r�r acne n.•ea a•Kr tkmrrm warranty famrar. w,,.., trn•,.,•[ Approvals 3aarSnmar"--Yryp a[awx-H ecureuutiur. T titio-q�Lpumvwrrc vr..roerr p,.w.e •�• m ABgLd�.j IPfiB rw v.rr.mr,-�0, s.,.o..• -.F �..-.,,m rx+,m VISCOR 1w P vre . r a:.. Slice Medium (SLM) Outdoor LED Area Light Q % a F IP66 -X- Q IK08 mLf V•nw re .-ar... a. ao r rr t. QUICK FalttF aaarp wra. wd•mr.nt. vr.em•rnr.e pun.nuona vuTTnru i uFlJFlGiION! Cvarwldlw: Fl•ctrkel curt MMMylbn eoor, IxetM arse«rr""n �� rrrq ac.�^"��ul "n Jw wnn L51 r wrecno- a mere sue c.,rm ppf.]veneed — gxka ea,v stem zbthe • trn�eedprmxr p1az. er•scie e y br moire War oo..ar.„wtfxnM«o.ae,z Hon v v mrrlonwe 1- 111 rin a... ar,n ootluisM.m omen Im,..,a.m�Arpes ' •w..au��rw�o ��re-a etwmen e wvesl vv.mmr � .arran.ve,n. rva ed pauu [.,•am .� rr "r r"tsm«wr• Ll�llrrpz mm-E •1M qr"'�'a Eroaevo..rnn e+rw•r arwmtnr -tma1 mrrrtsrr.Rn, wm•..«nw t«,vsrhr ra mce sst at,w"cailyn r.�:rr�ar ..aelnr�Marltr.. .uw. - are. r o�Ir.ae:•it.�n'�"r.:�` �•�w enl 1.ar�aul�� �a e°"'e 'a��eef uxxenrnr-lolcl wnKw p^m .br. .rw r•rk,L rrvmun a w„r.r rmreree -m�oval aq �"•••e,ea•. �a tibce.•Mr��•.a .vallar .a.m.b ho,,..w•>nnae �1,«,.er. d dr:o•+. w.vltrn.tyn.«wrx dm bcFkpnt conatmr.":rout vnrl cr ,rq,:.L<t acM1w.n son � a xjran''�- d-o.nwmtmes«wxaror..e•: rar, wnrp w+,• -Iyn.,rr• m r,ym wLmn. u.Fn �"�'""' (Solera TdlFee 9)J165.3)}3�fa 90''57.t151�wwwotxomtom VA A.. W- 5RB8K - Bollard w.m�nee�o',�i wtr '� mvvw.ns•k., r.,.....rteryn me ryr rrbrr�.re„sr n.. r,-[>� l �- LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE'SA' (MOUNT AT CARPORT FASCIA) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE'SB' (MOUNT AT CARPORT) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'SC','SE','SFAND'SG' (MOUNT AT 25' A.F.F.) LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'SH' (BOLLARD) LIGHT FIXTURE CUTSHEETS E1.4 SCALE: NTS k1irtm engineering consultants 3M<p Leapartl Slr aCA S A-101 vlm Do>rd pn1 l CLIENT: THE ALTUM GROUP 72140 MAGNESIA E FALLS DRIVE, SUITE 1 RANCHO MIRANGE, CA 92270 EORSTAMP - onn T tvrr+ 4� p` � PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE D APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT NW WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 C - ISSUANCE: B REVISE L: RATE I DESCRPTrDN DATE: 11.10.2022 PRR ECTrilul: 21_ALTG.003 wawa ar CHEr m sr GLIFR VL A 91aE TILE LIGHT FIXTURE CUTSHEETS I 2 3 4. 5 L SHEET N0: E 1.4 REFER. TO TYP. BUILDNG PLANTING EXHIBff _ �TING A 1 23 - ND Y IRWIN RCF�IITECT - - � 1•-" ! 1 + � �I IT �LI G r AR S ANS u 7 t . -" ;*"-�_ ��rL- +�:" �7� ..�.A 14- • _ -,•i � OARAOE NU�MQ SAGE 641Ud[ dWAGE MPAG� G�� 6Yf.�G[ GRAB. 6�N0s O�%A� - • ; r v. • r BLDG.9. K. BLDG. 2 .. _ •. BLDG. 10 ° 3 PAD=55.0 r • r• i .� :.} PAD=51.5 r PAD=53.5 -- NUORY115MrM BLDG.1 y pr _ ?�PRYfi[VIIfTS ,.. • 2.STORY/1e UNRS _ FOOTGRW-SAOSSSF 'y +• I z-STORY/ euNffS F[iOfPM T.lfil�eF I t .. FOQIRMr-GAODt eF . L• c F001Rnrt4=MSF i BLDG. 11 s o •' -- PAD=53.0 • b } • ! z FOOTPRef-oA013 SF-`� BLDG. 6 r � � ` . -� ��� � • PAD=54.5CLUB � ♦ �� t 'l • MOUSE b r►. b fJ- � BLDG. 3 �•• o ci j PAD=53.0 • '" ;�._ TaolvRvzr-14Aeet SFOW 4t 'iP 1 +� "o • • a { • • BLDG. 4 a BLDG. 7 • it BLDG.1.0 PAD=51"p PAD=53.0 PAD=51.0 rsTwr+1� - - . •• ' - ]STORY 112 UNfTe FO0�ISI.T•T9Ee - 35TORY IN UNRS FOOTPRNT-73Wt 8F _ p 4 FVJIPRfIs-19,�Sa+3 + �i SHADE STRUCTURE WITH PICNIC TABLES � Y .,. i - -. - - � � � r: I � -� � -i.} � 11 I I ': i ,� • ° jI � - . `` �+ „-;� -- - -- - -- - 5�^ - -'.s 1 _ /, =• .h. ZONE 2: Sall ETf r ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED WATER 116E TREE AND SHRUB LOW DRIP / BJBB_ER ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAWU .� � •I` I` -- v r I.- -- ? • / �j11 55.O X .20 X 102,383 X 0b2 / '748 / .90 = 1,093.711 TREE AND SHRUB MODERATE- DRIP / BUBBLER BLDG. BLDG.6 • - I ETC X FF X LA X 0,62 / '745 / IE = EAAWU PAD=0. T a. 50.5 / ! PAD=52.0 / I 1 i 58A X .50 x 68�56 X 0 62 / '745 / .90 = 1,525 1 28TORY 116 MRS J FOOTRWT +1A�t r3 - ' + .'j - 1� - _'.. FaarFlwr-4000t sF illl TURF HIGH- ROTOR +�?-` • - ,maoif q++7f'� _b, Sp SO - ETC X FF X LA X Ob2 / '745 / IE = EAAWU F, so58"0 X .70 X 55,47-1 X 0.62 / '145 / .80 = 1,40591 •SO SO So p`T i JI-- -=- -- --a----"•- ------- - W �,-�-------- TURF HIGH ;.-��___ar• `- , r� - _• ETD X PF X LA X 0.62 / 745 / IE = EAAAU -- - ._ •- - ",.M - �_-----; L �- - - - - �`--------= 55.0 X _-70 X 1,0?0 X 0.62 / '748 / .90 = 40.76 --'k-� TURF HIGH - 5FRAY ETC X PF X LA X 0.62 / 745 / IE = EAAWU - -- - 580 X 0_70 X I,679 x O-b2 / -745 / .75 = -T534 -------_- --i - - -••-••-•---•--�.......w•.... ••••--•••••••-----••-W--••---• --- - MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE F-T REFER TO SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBff ACCENT PAVING P�KL EBAL1 � 55. x "45 x LA x 0 62 / / = MAAWU 58.0 X .45 X 211,482 X Ob2 / 748 = 4r="!5"14 PUTTING GREEN AREA - 3,161 PUTTING GREEN POOL RECREATION AREA POOL AND 51-A AREA - 1,454 ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED WATER U5E TOTAL - 4,441.2 MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4�5T514 ESTIMATED LANDSCAPE 5GUARE FT. TOTAL - 211,462 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LP-1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. m• ao- eo- 170' SUITE 102R T, CA PARKER DEVELOPMENT PALM DESERT, 92211 L1Cq 2754, EXI' 04i30,'22 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA SALE: "=4o' PH (7G0) 777 FAX (760) 777-9137-9132 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS PLANT LIST SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER USE TFEE5 4 PALMS ✓ DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 02 LOW TRASH /f! -� �� "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" r TIPUANA TIF'U 24" BOX 05 MOD "TIPII TREE' OLEA EUROPAEA 36" BOX 02 LOW 'SWAN HILL' MULTI-TRK OF ACACIA STENOPHYLLA 24" BOX O2 LOW 0 M iV F100"FUCPr M I C "SHOESTRING ACACIA" SINGLE TRK 5TND. -- - o q p q y v ACACIA B0.2 � WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRC 5TND, PARKINSONIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRIO STND. { •� ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW `Eli' 'TIULGA" 51NGLE TRK STND- P uFNI 4 5 MOD ®' - ■ - ZAHIDI DATE PALM W A ROBSTA DIAMOND GUT 15' BTH 05 MOD "MEXICAN MEXICAN FAN PALLM" _ ® � DESERT ACCENTS � P � AGAVE SISALANA IS GAL, 02 LOW 'SISAL BLDG. 1 AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" 2-ST AVE MINIF� 5 GAL. 02 LOW _ / "3T1U N FLEOWERI AGAVE" PAD 51 III HE5PERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOU) •O FOOT DESERT FLAMENCO' EGHINOCAGTUS II 5 GAL 02 LOW 2—STORY / 16 UNITS i "GOLDEN BARRELREL CACTUS" ff SHRUBS FOOTPRINT— 7,500± SF i CAES PINTBIR 15 GAL_ 02 LOW OF PARED EA - � a LE5 OSUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW EORPHAYBIUQQUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FI IITESCENS 5 GAL, 02 LOW 'WHITE CLOUD' ® S S NNA"FEATHERY ARTEHERY 5 GAL. 02 LOW AS51A "FEATHERY CASSIA" O TECOMA STANS 5 GAL- 05 MOD _ "YELLOW BELLS" BELLS" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL- 02 LOU) '• LYN5 LEGACY' 1 1 - Y. - - + • © OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW '1{c` LITTLE OLLIE' •.: IFOR'l15 Rl"C 5 GAL. 05 MOD BELLS" CORAL BELLS" "CORAL rO �` LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW CIMARRON' CARISSA MAGROCARPA 5 GAL 05 MOD :- : '" , •• BOXWOOD BEAUTY' ;'t'r, :; �' C'LITLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD TLE OHN CsRASSES �: {,,•' `tda� .� MUHLENBEY3'sIA GAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD z """ .•- _µ,, 'REGAL MIST' f',:• • 71f' ` _ :� LOMANDRM OLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'PLATINUMBEAUTY ).. rt� O DIANELLA 5 GAL. 05 MOD V 'VARIEGATA' ■ D, r ■ GF-OUNDCOVER 4 VINES 1 - '�a DIL I 5 GAL, 02 LOW �++- `-"�- _ INDIGO BUSH" TRAILINGINDIGO • �. �.. .: � - •-�. CAR155A 5 GAL. OB MOD _ _ pr 'GLEN CARPET' EVOLVULU5 GLOMERATUS 5 GAL 02 LOW "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" Q BOUGAINVILLEA 5 GAL. 05 MOD LA JOLLA' DURANTA R-PENS 5 GAL. 5TK 05 MOD "SKY FLOWER" TYP. BUILDING PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OB5TRIICTED FROM ACCE55 BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3-FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. WATER CONSERVATIOK STATEMENT LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302E THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL A DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT E'+' 10' 20, 30, PERrORMANGE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. IT SCALE: 1".10' LP-2 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LICK 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 r,ATE b/b/25 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS 6' HT. WALL SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA PLANT LIST SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER USE TREES a f 4L IS QA) DALBERSIA SISSOO 24" BOX 02 LOW ) "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" TIPUANA TIPU 24" BOX 05 MOD 'TIF'U TREE" • OLEA EUROPAEA 36"BOX 02 LOW ' 'SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRIO ACACIA STETRIN BOX LOW ACACIA "SHOESTRING ACACIA" SIN SINGLE TRfC TN STND. • ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOW "WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TIC STND. PAR'KINSONIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW 4 "PALO BREA" SINGLE TR1C STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW SINGLE TRIO S0.5 PHOENIOENIX DAGTYLIFERA IB' BTH 05 MOD 'ZAHIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WA51-IINGTONIA ROBUSTA 18' BTH 05 MOD "MEXICAN FAN PALM" DESERT ACCENTS AGAVE SISALANA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "515AL" AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" f AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" IHESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'DESERT FLAMENCO' G EGHINOCACTUS GRU50NII 5 GAL, 02 LOW "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" SHRUBS CAESALPINIA PULGHERRIMA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "RED BIRD OF PAR4DI5E" ' a LEUCOPHYLLUM PRUINOSUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'SIERRA BOUQUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESGEN5 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'WHITE -LOUD' ® SIENNA ARTEMISIOIDES 5 GAL. 02 LOW "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® TECOMA STANS 5 GAL, 05 MOD "YELLOW BELLS" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW LYNS LEGACY' OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LITTLE OLLIE' RUSSELIA EQUI5ETIFORMIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD "CORAL BELL5" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOF'HYLLUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'CIMARRON' CARISSA MACROCARPA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'BOXWOOD BEAUTY' CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD LITTLE JOHN' GRASSES Y MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'REGAL MIST' • LOMANDRA LONCIFOLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' @ DIANELLA TASMANICA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'VARIEGATA' GROUNZ)GOVE 4 VIN S DALEA GREGG11 5 GAL. 02 LOW TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARI55A 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATU5 5 GAL. 02 LOW "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" BOUGANVILLEA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'LA JOLLA' DURANTA REF'ENS 5 GAL. 5T1C 05 MOD "5KY FLOWER" NOTE: PI V, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCE55 BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3-FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCIIf-IFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. ATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT LANDSCAPING 15 GON515TENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER T DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1IGNE THE IRRIGATION t?, 1D 20' 30' SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND- POINT I� SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHR11B5 AND TREES, SCALE: I"=10' LP-3 Al HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 77-899 WOLF RD, SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LICK 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 OAT'DAT'= 6/6/2� CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS 14, I - POOL AREA PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA ACCENT PAVING 69 NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATICR. A MINIMUM 3-FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCUMFEFENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. PL4NT LIST SYMBOL 0 Y. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER USE TREF-S 8 PALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 02 LOU) "INDIAN R05EWOOD" TIPUANA TIPJ 24" BOX 05 MOD "TIPU TREE" OLEA EUROPAEA 36" BOX 02 LOW 'SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRIO ACACIA STENOPPTLLA 24" BOX 02 LOW "SHOESTRING ACACIA" SINGLE TRK STND. • ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOW "WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRI- STND. PAWIN50NIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRK STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW "MULGA" SINGLE TRK 5TND. PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA 18' BTH 05 MOD 'ZAHIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA 18' BTH 05 MOD "MEXI CAN FAN PALM" QE5ERT ACCENTS AGAVE SISALANA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "SISAL" AGAVE ANGU5TIFOLIA 15 GAL, 02 LOW "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'DESERT FLAMENCO' p ECHINOCACTU5 GRUSONII 5 GAL. 02 LOW "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" SHRUBS CAE5ALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 15 GAL, 02 LOW "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" 'a LEUGOPHYLLUM PRUINOSUM 5 GAL, O2 LOWLO 'SIERRA BOUQUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCEN5 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'WHITE CLOUD' ® SENNA ARTEMISIOIDE5 5 GAL. 02 LOW "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® TECOMA STANS 5 GAL, 05 MOD "YELLOW BELLS" © LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LYN5 LEGACY' ® OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LITTLE OLLIE' . RUS5ELIA EQUISETIFOFRM15 5 GAL- 0.5 MOD "CORAL BELLS" t� LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'CIMARRON, CARI55A MACROCARPA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'BOXWOOD BEAUTY' ® CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'LITTLE JOHN' GRASSES MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'REGAL MI5T' LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' 0 DIANELLA TA5MANICA 5 GAL. 05 MOD VARIEGATA' 5R0UNC>C-0Vf-R E VINES DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL, 02 LOW TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" . CARI55A 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' r EVOLVLLU5 GLOMERATU5 5 GAL. 02 LOW "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" BOY. ANVILLEA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'LA JOLLA' -�. DURANTA REPEN5 5 GAL. 5TIC 05 MOD "SKY FLOWER" LUATER CONSERVATION STATEi'iENT LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 77-b99 WOLF RD. DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION � 0' I0' 20' 30, SUITE 102 SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PALM DESERT, CA PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE 92211 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. LIC0 2754, EXP 04/30'22 SCALE: P=10' PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS PLANS J ic_ 6 . I BLOCK VEHICULAR GATES jrrCly=l�� r- Q 3 ENTRY PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA — WATER FEATURE NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE 055TR1CTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION A MINIMUM 3-FEET RADW5 AROJND EACH DEVICE GIRCIII"EER=NCE SHALL BE FREE 0= OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE REGUIREMEN75 OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302-I, THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT 0 �O 70 >O PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOJRCE DRIP / BUBBLER 5Y5TEM5 WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE 5HRUB5 AND TREES. PALE: P" 10' LP-5 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 77-899 )A:OLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT,C.A 92211 LIC4 2754, EXP 04i30.'22 PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 CITY COUNCIL MEETING PUBLIC H�ARIN AUGUST 1, 2023 - HANDOUT BY IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS ITEM NO. 2 - LQ VILLAGE. APARTMENTVLANS 00 7S _ GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE � ®• tl oo LAUN ;o 7 11 a - r c BLDG.2 { BLDG. 1 PAD=51 25TGRY/22 UNNITS �^ - PADL=51.0 FLG2PRR�T-10,➢6Qa SF I , 7V 'D YSTiNi'f / 1b UNffS E'OOTPR.NT ice-' SF i I � ; • - � O Q _ . P r I ■.. n fro CLUB J o id.e ROUSE �^ -- - _ N� • i p A11 - •N� • Pan=sx.o kq>rd I . k • . o ` • :. y3 • 9 � D • C MONUMENT -� .; __._ . . ..• .. o �', s 'I SIGN DY, Q BLDG. 4 BLDG. 4-1 PAD=51.0 _ _ PAD=51.0 O TORY/16UNTTS V _r•••+lll' ,' -- 2-STORY/12UNITS FOOTPRINT-7,5 SF - . ! FOOTPRINT-],SOO15F L. ,yam - 0 BLDG.3 - PAD=53.0 _ bSTORY / ]6 UNITS FGGFPRINi•1i,6 EF r BLDG.11 PAD=53.0 2-STORY / 16 UNITS FOOTP11INT-9.1W SF BLDG,? ` PAD=53,0 _ - }STORY 124 UNITS _ � -., +OOTP4HT-10,OWx 5F •Ai L ob got GARAGE GARAGE GA E GARAGE I GARAGE �� I TRA.9N • BLDG.9 BLDG. 10 PAD=55.0 PAD=53.5 2-STORY116 UNITS - _.'1STORY/16UN175 — FOOTPRINT-9,0001 SF V FOOTPRINT-9,00015E{l+ ' V, LEGEND , ICULAR.TUHIl M ST'FEL GATES EX15TING BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN IN PLACE 6' HT. BLOCK WALL WITH STUCCO FIN15W TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE ., ! r •I '�' — � .j + _ - + '� 6' HT, 5PLITFAGE TAN COLOR BLOCK WALL Ad' ` HT. PILASTER WITH STUCCO FINISH WITH DECORATIVE TAN COLOR GAP �_ BLDG. 5PAD=52.0 - -i- I PAD 50 5 - - ' - BLDG. 6 _ _ l �' I . ._ - _ i _� =I = Ii - 1•' • 2-i'- ui . m uNlm yI T~ _ '— _ E E 111 2-STORY/16 UNITS _ F001'PRINT-11,6Wx 5F �'� `�: • — _ SD SD yyyy}}@@qq�� � IC . _.. Yk69�y�� . V. —------------------ '------ ,.. t 7RAfFlC LANE -{-- - - - - s 7UMF -- FT - ----------------------------_�-_--- 1RAFFC LANE-_---.------------------ -- -� 1RMlC LANE CONCEPTUAL WALL AND FENCE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS -- MONUMENT SKA c+gcT,nc TAN Nr. Arm. L6n6R)Yi LP-6 HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-899 WO102 LF RD. 1. am W. 170' SUITE PALM DESERT, CA 92211 L1CN 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: P -4m' PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 'ATE b/b/23